This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. (एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

REGD. NO . D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003-05

जयते भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 51]

नई दिल्ली, दिसम्बर 16 दिसम्बर 22 , 2007 , शनिवार/अग्रहायण 25 पौष 1 , 1929 NEW DELHI , DECEMBER 16-- DECEMBER 22, 2007 , SATURDAY/AGRAHAYANA 25-PAUSA 1 , 1929 No. 51 ]

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II-खण्ड 3-उप-खण्ड ( ii ) PART II-Section 3--Sub- section ( ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

वित्त मंत्रालय (राजस्व विभाग )

केंद्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क, पुणे I आयुक्तालय के आयुक्त का कार्यालय ,

पुणे, 19 नवम्बर , 2007

संख्या 05/2007-केंद्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क ( नॉन टैरिफ ) का.आ. 3539,- भारत सरकार , वित्त मंत्रालय, राजस्व विभाग , नई दिल्ली द्वारा दिनांक 1-7-1994 को जारी अधिसूचना संख्या 33/94-सी. शु. ( नॉन टैरिफ ) द्वारा मुझे, प्रदत्त अधिकारों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैं, एतद्वारा ) महाराष्ट्र राज्य में पुणे जिले के, तालुका मुलशी के, गांव हिंजवडी को, सीमाशुल्क अधिनियम, 1962( 1962 का 52 ) की धारा 9 के अधीन निजी बॉन्डेड वेअरहाउस स्थापन करने के लिए वेअरहाउसिंग स्टैशन घोषित करता हूँ ।

[फा. सं. VIII/48-74/नि. बॉ. वे. हिंजवडी/सीसीयू/पीजैड/07] आर, शर्मा, मुख्य आयुक्त 4935 GI/ 2008

MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department ofRevenue)

(OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS) Pune, the 19th November , 2007 No. 05/2007 -Cus (NT)

S.O. 3539.- In exercise ofthe power confirmed on me by the Notification No. 33/94-Cus (NT) , dated 1-7-1994 of the Government of India , Ministry of Finance , Department of Revenue , New Delhi , I , hereby decíare Village -Hinjewadi, Taluka - Mulshi , Dist - Pune in the State ofMaharashtra to be a Warehousing Station , under Section 9 ofthe Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) , for setting up Private Bonded Warehouse .

[F. No. VIII/48-74 /PBW- HINJEWADI/CCU /PZ/07] R. SHARMA, Chief Commissioner

(9799) 5800

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

पुणे, 19 नवम्बर, 2007 संख्या 03/2007- केंद्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क ( नॉन टैरिफ ) कर.आर. 3540.- भारत सरकार , वित्त मंत्रालय , राजस्व विभाग , नई दिल्ली द्वारा दिनांक 1-7-1994 को जारी अधिसूचना संख्या 33/94-सी, शु. ( नॉन टैरिफ ) द्वारा मुझे , प्रदत्त अधिकारों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैं एतद्‌द्वारा , गोवा राज्य में, तालुका सालशेत के, गांव ' गया' को सीमाशुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 52 ) की धारा १ निजी ऑत रहाउस स्थापन करने के लिए वेअरहाउसिंग स्टेशन घोषित करता हूँ ।

[फा. सं. Vill/48-177/नि. बॉ. वे. राया/सीसीयू/पीजैड/07 ] आर. शर्मा , मुख्य आयुक्त Pune , the 19th November, 2007 No. 03/2007 Cus (NT)

S.O. 3540.- In exercise of the power confirmed on me by the Notification No. 33/94 - Cus (NT) , dated 1-7-1994 of the Government of India , Ministry of Finance , Department of Revenue , New Delhi , I , hereby declare Village -'Raia', Taluka-Salcete , Goa, in the State of Goa to be a Warehousing Station , under Section 9 of the Customs Act , 1962 (52 of 1962) , for setting up Private Bonded Warehouse .

[ F. No. VIII/48-177 /PBW -RAIA/CCU /PZ/ 07 ] R. SHARMA , Chief Commissioner पुणे , 19 नवम्बर , 2007

संख्या 04/2007-केंद्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क ( नॉन टैरिफ ) का.आ. 3541.-भारत सरकार , वित्त मंत्रालय , राजस्व विभाग , नई दिल्ली द्वारा दिनांक 1-7-1994 को जारी अधिसूचना संख्या 33/94- सी. शु. ( नॉन टैरिफ ) द्वारा मुझे , प्रदत्त अधिकारों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैं एतद्वारा , गोवा राज्य में , उत्तरी गोवा जिले में, तालुका तिसवाडी के , गांव ' नारवा ' को , सीमाशुल्क अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 52 ) की धारा 9 के अधीन निजी बॉन्डेड वेअरहाउस स्थापन करने के लिए वेअरहाउसिंग स्टेशन घोषित करता हूँ ।

[ फा. सं. VIII/48-176/नि. बॉ. वे. नारवा/सीसीयू/पीजैड/07] आर. शर्मा , मुख्य आयुक्त Pune, the 19th November , 2007

No. 04/2007 -Cus (NT)

S.O. 3541. In exercise of the power confirmed on meby the Notification No. 33/ 94- Cus (NT) , dated 1-7-1994 of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department ofRevenue , New Delhi , 1, hereby declare Village -'Naroa ' , Taluka- Tiswadi , Dist- North Goa , in the State of Goa to be a Warehousing Station , under Section 9 of the Customs Act , 1962 (52 of 1962) , for setting up Private Bonded Warehouse .

[F. No. VIII /48-176/PBW- NAROA/ CCU /PZ/ 07 ] R. SHARMA. Chief Commissioner कार्यालय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त

जयपुर , 30 नवम्बर , 2007

संख्या 09 /2007-2008

का.आ. 3542,-आयकर नियम , 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43वां) की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 सी ) की उप- धारा ( vi ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त , जयपुर एतद्वारा निर्धारण वर्ष 2006-07 से 2008-09 के लिए कथित धारा के उद्देश्य से " सात्विक जीवनशाला ट्रस्ट , जयपुर " को स्वीकृति देते हैं । बशर्ते कि समिति आयकर नियम , 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 के उप-खण्ड (23 सी ) की उप - धारा ( vi ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप कार्य करे ।

[कमांकः मुआआआआआ/ (समन्वय )/जय/ 10 (23 सी ) ( vi ) /07-08 /3930 ] एस. सी. कपिल, मुख्य आयुक्त OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF

INCOME TAX

Jaipur, the 30th November, 2007

No. 09/2007-08

S.O. 3542. In exercise of the powers confirmed by sub - clause( vi ) of clause (23C ) of Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) read wirh rule 2CA ofthe Income-tax Rules , 1962 the Chief Commissioner of Income- tax, Jaipur hereby approves " Satwic Jeevanshala Trust , Jaipur" for the purpose of said Section for the A. Y. 2006-07 to 2008-09 .

Provided that the society conforms to and complies with the provisions of sub - clause (vi ) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income - tax Act, 1961 read with rule 2CA ofthe Income- tax Rules , 1962 .

[No. CCIT/ JPR/Add ./CIT( Coord)/ 10( 23C)( vi )/2007-08/

3930]

S. C. KAPIL, Chief Commissioner जयपुर , 11 दिसम्बर , 2007

सं. 04सीमा शुल्क ( एनटी ) 2007 (सीमा शुल्क)

का.आ. 3543, सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 की धारा 152 के खण्ड ( ए) के तहत भारत सरकार , वित्त मंत्रायल , राजस्व विभाग , नई दिल्ली की अधिसूचना संख्या 33/94- सीमा शुल्क ( एन टी) दिनांक 1 जुलाई, 1994 के अन्तर्गत प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैं , बी. एस. वी. मूर्ति, आयुक्त , केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क, जयपुर-द्वितीय एतद्वारा , शतप्रतिशत निर्यात संवर्द्धन ईकाई स्थापित करने के उद्देश्य से सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 की धारा 9 के अन्तर्गत राजस्थान राज्य के जी-14 से जी-17, मेवाड़ औधोगिक क्षेत्र (एम आई ए ) मादरी ( एक्सटेंशन ) आई टी पार्क, उदयपुर को भण्डारण स्टेशन ( वेयर हाउसिंग स्टेशन ) घोषित करता हूँ । [फा. सं. पंचम ( ईओयू) 30 /जे. पी./11 /7/2007 ] बी. एस. वी. मूर्ति, आयुक्त [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Jaipur, the 11th December , 2007 No. 4/2007 - CUS(NT)-2007 (Customs)

S.O. 3543. In exercise of the powers confirmed by Notification No. 33/94 Customs (NT) dated 1st July, 1994 of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance , Department of Revenue , New Delhi , issued under clause (a) of Section 152 of Customs Act 1962 , I , B. S. V. Murthy, Commissioner , Central Excise, Jaipur- II hereby declare place G-14 toG- 17, Mewar Industrial Area ( MIA) , Madri (EXT.) IT Park, Udaipur , Rajasthan to be Warehousing Station under Section 9 of the Customs Act , 1962 for the purpose of setting up 100% export oriented undertaking.

[C. No. V(Custorns )JP-11/7/2007] B. S. V. MURTHY , Commissioner (केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )

नई दिल्ली, 10 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3544.- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एत‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5 ग और 5ड. के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2005 से संगठन चैन्नई मैथमेटिकल इंस्टीटयूट , चैन्नई को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगी 'अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थातः- (i) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

(ii) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा;

(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन बही- खाता रखेगा तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा । ( iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित ऐसे विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुभोदित संगठनः- (क) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नही रखेगा; अथवा

(ख) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

9801

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

(ग) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसकुं अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा (ड. ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5ग और 5ड. के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रवाधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा।

[अधिसूचना सं. 287/2007/फा.सं. 203 /57/2007- आ.क.नि. - 11]

सुरेन्द्र पाल, अवर सचिव (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) New Delhi , the 10th December , 2007 S.O. 3544. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Chennai Mathematical Institute , Chennai has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii) of sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 35.of the income- tax Act , 1961 (said Act), read with Rules 55C and 5E of the Income - tax Rules, 1962 (said Rules) , with effect from 1-4-2005 in the category of' other institution' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(1) The sums paid to the approved organization shall beutilized for scientific research ;

( ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain books of accounts and get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section (2 ) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissoner of Income-tax or the Director of Income- tax having jurisdiction over the case, by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 139 of the said Act;

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above.

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval ifthe approved organization: -

(a) Fails to maintain books of accounts referred to in sub -paragraph ( iii) of paragraph 1; or

(b) Fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub -paragraph ( iii) of paragraph 1 or

(c) Fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub - paragraph ( iv) of paragraph 1 ; or 9802

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/ PAUSA 1 , 1929

(d) Ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or (e) Ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the said Act read with rules 5C and 5 E of the said Rules .

[Notification No. 287/2007/F.No . 203 /67 /2007 /ITA - II ] SURENDER PAL, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 10 दिसम्बर , 2007 (आयकर )

का.आ. 3545.-आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 194क की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( iii ) के उप- खंड ( च ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर फाइनेन्सकम्पनी लिमिटेड , नई दिल्ली , को उक्त उप- खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करती है ।

[सं 288/2007/फा.सं. 275/68/2007- आ.क. ( बजट) ] वी. एन. गाबा , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 10th December , 2007

(IncomeTax)

S.O. 3545.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -clause ( f) of clause ( iii) of sub - section (3 ) of Section 194A ofthe Income Tax Act , 1961 , the Central Government hereby notifies the India Infrastructure Finance Company Limited, New Delhi, for the purpose of said sub -clause.

[No. 288/2007 F.No. 275/68 /2007 - IT(B ) ] V. N. GABA, Under Secy.

(वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग ) नई दिल्ली , 11 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3546.-बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम , 1949 (1949 का 10 ) की धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर, एतद्वारा घोषणा करती है कि बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम , 1949 की धारा 10 ( 1 ) ( ग ) ( i ) के उपबंध श्री योगेश अग्रवाल , अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक , आईडीबीआई पर लागू नहीं होंगे , जहां तक उनका संबंध आईडीबीआई फोर्टिस लाइफ इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड के निदेशक मंडल में उनका नामांकन होने से है ।

[फा. सं. 18/2 /2006- बीओए ] डी. पी. भारद्वाज , अवर सचिव (Department of Financial Services) New Delhi , the 11th December , 2007 S.O. 3546. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 ofthe Banking Regulation Act, 1949 ( 10 of 1949), the Central Government, on the recommendations of Reserve Bank of India, hereby declares that the provisions ofSection 10 ( 1 )( c )( i ) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 shall not apply to Shri Yogesh Agarwal , Chairman and Managing Director , IDBI in so far as they relate to his

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

nomination to the Board of IDBI - Fortis Life Insurance CompanyLtd.

[F. No. 18 /2/2006- BOA] D. P. BHARDWAJ , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 11 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3547. - राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक (प्रबन्ध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम , 1970/1980 के खण्ड 3 के उप - खण्ड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम, 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उप- धारा 3 के खण्ड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा , श्रीमती विनिता कुमार, आर्थिक सलाहकार , वित्त मंत्रालय, वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग , नई दिल्ली को तत्काल प्रभाव से और अगले आदेश होने तक श्री पी.पी. मित्रा के स्थान पर सेन्ट्रल बैंक आफ इंडिया के निदेशक मण्डल में निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. 9/7/2007- बीओ -1 ] जी. बी. सिंह, उप सचिव New Delhi , the 11th December , 2007

S.O. 3547. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of sub - section (3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act , 1970/1980 , read with sub- clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 ofthe Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme , 1970/1980 , the Central Government , hereby nominates Smt. Vinita Kumar, Economic Adviser, Ministry ofFinance, Department of Financial Services , New Delhi as a Director on the Board of Directors of Central Bank of India with immediate effect and until further orders vice Shri P.P. Mitra .

[F.No. 9/7/2007-BO.I] G.B. SINGH , Dy. Secy.

जयपुर , 14 दिसम्बर , 2007

सं. 08/2007-08

का.आ. 3548.-आयकर नियम , 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 वां ) की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 सी ) की उप- धारा ( vi ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त , जयपुर एतद्वारा निर्धारण वर्ष 2002-03 के लिए कथित धारा के उद्देश्य से " श्री मोदी शिक्षण संस्थान , जयपुर " को स्वीकृति देते हैं ।

יל बशर्ते कि समिति आयकर नियम 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 के उम - खण्ड (23सी) की उप- धारा ( vi ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप कार्य करे ।

[क्रमांकः मुआआआआआ/( समन्वय )/जय/10 ( 23सी) (vi )/07-08/4126 ] एस. सी. कपिल , मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त Jaipur , the 14th December, 2007 No. 08/2007-08

S.O. 3548. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- clause (vi ) of clause (23C ) of Section 10 of the [ भाग II--खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Income-taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961) read with rule 2CA ofthe Income-taxRules, 1962 the Chief Commissioner of Inocme- tax, Jaipur hereby approves " Shri Modi Shikshan Sansthan, Jaipur" for the purpose of said Section for the A.Y. 2002-03 . Provided that the society conforms to and complies with the provisions of sub - clause ( vi) of clause (23C) of Section 10 ofthe Income -tax Act , 1961 read with rule 2CA ofthe Income-tax Rules , 1962 .

[No. CCIT/JPR/Addl . CIT( Coord. )/ 10(23C)(vi )/ 2007-08/4126] S. C. KAPIL, Chief Commissioner स्वास्थ्यएवं परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 5 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3549. भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 (1956 का 102 ) की धारा 20 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) और ( 3 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् ने अपने सदस्यों में से डा. नरेन्द्र प्रसाद, डा. एम. एम. डेका और डा. मैशेखर दिलीप गोविन्दराव को भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् की स्नातकोत्तर चिकित्सा शिक्षा समिति के सदस्यों के रूप में निर्वाचित किया है । अतः अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 20 की उप -धारा ( 1 ) और (3 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद की स्नातकोत्तर चिकित्सा शिक्षा समिति के सदस्यों के रूप में निम्नलिखित को इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से पांच वर्षों की अवधि के लिए नियुक्त करती है :-

भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् द्वारा निर्वाचित

1. डा. नरेन्द्र प्रसाद ,

एम एस 6, डॉक्टर कालोनी , कंकड़ बाग , पटना

2. डा. एम.एम. डेका , प्राचार्य, गोवाहटी मेडिकल कॉलेज गोवाहटी

3. डा. मैशेखर दिलीप गोविन्दराव , कैलाश नगर , नांदेड़-431602 महाराष्ट्र

[सं. वी-11013 /5/2001- एम.ई. (पी-1 ) ] के.बी.एस. राव , उप-सचिव MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE New Delhi , the 5th December 2007

S.O. 3549. Whereas in pursuance ofthe provision ofsub-section ( 1 ) and (3 ) ofSection 20 of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956), Dr. Narendra Prasad,Dr. M.M. Deka and Dr. Mhaisekar Deelip Govindrao have been elected by the Medical Council of India from amongst its members to be Members of the Post Graduate Medical Education Committee ofthe Medical Council of Inida.

9803

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

Now, therefore, in pursuance of the provision of sub- section ( 1 ) and (3 ) of Section 20 of the said Act, the Central Governmenthereby appoints following as members of the Post-Graduate Medical Education Committee ofthe Medical Council of India for a period of five years from the date of issue of this notification :- :

ELECTED BY THE MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA 1. Dr. Narendra Prasad MS, 6,DoctorsColony KankerBagh , Patna

2. Dr. M.M. Deka, Principal, Gauhati Medical College , Guwahati

3. Dr. Mhaisekar Deelip Govindrao Kailash Nagar, Nanded-431602 Maharashtra

[No. V. 11013/5/2001 -ME (P- 1 ) ] K.V.S. RAO , Dy. Secy.

विदेश मंत्रालय (सीपी वी डिविजन ) नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर , 2007

का.आ. 3550.-राजनयिक कौंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ एवं शुल्क) अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 41 वां ) की धारा 2 के खंड (क) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा भारत का राजदूतावास , मस्कट ( ओमान ) में श्री पी. हरिदासन , सहायक को 31-10-07 से सहायक कौंसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[फा. सं. टी-4330/01 /2006 ] प्रीतम लाल, अवर सचिव ( कौंसुलर ) MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS (C. P. V. Division) New Delhi , the 31st October , 2007 .

S.O. 3550.-In pursuance of clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers ( Oaths and Fees) Act , 1948, (41 of 1948) the Central Government hereby authorize Shri P. Haridasan, Assistant to perform the duties of Assistant Consular Officer in the Embassy of India, Muscat (Oman) with effect from 31st October, 2007.

[F.No.T. 4330/1/2006] PRITAM LAL, Under Secy. ( Consular) नई दिल्ली , 12 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3551.-राजनयिक कौंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ एवं शुल्क) अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 41 वां ) की धारा 2 के खंड (क) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा भारत का राजदूतावास , 9804

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II---SEC . 3 (ii) ] अदिस अबाबा में सुश्री सुषमा कुमार सहायक को 6-11-2007 से सहायक कौंसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[फा. सं. टी -4330/01 / 2006 ]

Sekar , PA, Shri Umed Singh, UDC and Smt. Meera, UDCto perform the duties of Assistant Consular Officers in the Consulate General of India Dubai with effect from 19th November , 2007 .

प्रीतम लाल , अवर सचिव (कौंसुलर) New Delhi , the 12th November , 2007

[F. No. T. 4330/01/2006] P.M. MEENA , Jt . Secy . (Counsular) नई दिल्ली, 20 नवम्बर , 2007

S.O. 3551. In pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 , (41 of 1948) the Central Government hereby authorize Smt . Sushma Kumar, Assistant to perform the duties of Assistant Consular Officer in the Embassy of India, Addis Ababa with effect from 12th November , 2007 .

[No. Τ. 4330/1/2006]

का.आ. 3554.- राजनयिक कौंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ एवं शुल्क) अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 41 वां ) की धारा 2 के खंड (क) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा भारत का प्रधान कौंसलावास, सान फ्राँसिस्को में श्री आर. के. दुबे , सहायक को 20-11-2007 से सहायक कौंसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[फा. सं. टी-4330/01 /2006 PRITAM LAL , Under Secy . (Consular ) नई दिल्ली , 12 नवम्बर , 2007

पी. एम. मीना, संयुक्त सचिव (कौंसुलर )

New Delhi , the 20th November , 2007

का.आ. 3552. राजनयिक कौंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ एवं शुल्क) अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 41 वां ) की धारा 2 के खंड ( क) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा भारत का राजदूतावास , कुवेत में श्रीमति राधा सुकुमारन , सहायक को 12-11-2007 से सहायक कौंसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है ।

S.O. 3554.-In pursuance of the clause ( a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and fees) Acı , 1948 ( 41 of 1948 ) , the Central Government hereby authorize Shri R. K. Dubey , Assistantto perform: the duties of Assistant Consular Officer in the Consulate General of India San Francsico with effect from 20th November , 2007 .

[फा. सं. टी -4330/01 /2006 ] प्रीतम लाल , अवर सचिव ( कौंसुलर ) New Delhi , the 12th November , 2007

[No. Τ . 4330/01/2006] P.M. MEENA , Jt . Secy. ( Consular)

कोयला मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली , 13 दिसम्बर , 2007

S.O. 3552. In pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948 ), the Central Government hereby authorize Mrs. Radha Sukumaran , Assistant in Embassy of India, Kuwait to perform the duties of Assistant ConsularOfficer with effect from 12-11-2007 .

[F. No. T. 4330/01/2006]

PRITAM LAL , Under Secy. ( Consular) नई दिल्ली, 19 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3555. केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी , भारत के राजपत्र , भाग 11 खंड 3 , उप - खंड ( ii ) , तारीख 22 जुलाई , 2007 को प्रकाशित , भारत सरकार कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का. आ. संख्यांक 2095 , तारीख 20 जुलाई , 2007 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में, जिसका माप 646.23 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 1596.18 एकड़ ( लगभग ) है , कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आक्षय की सूचना दी थी ।

का.आ. 3553. राजनयिक कौंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ एवं शुल्क) अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 41 वां ) की धारा 2 के खंड (क) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा भारत का प्रधान कौंसलाबास , दुबई में श्रीमती रेणु गौतम , सहायक श्री जे.वी.एस. सेकर , वैयक्तिक सहायक, श्री उमेद सिंह, उच्च श्रेणी लिपिक और श्रीमती मीरा , उच्च श्रेणी लिपिक को 19-11-2007 से सहायक कौंसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[फा. सं. टी -4330/01 /2006 ]

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है, कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित उक्त भूमि के भाग में कोयला अभिप्राप्य है ।

पी. एम. मीना , संयुक्त सचिव ( कोंसुलर )

New Delhi , the 19th November 2007

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास) अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शाक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 645.33 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 1593.98 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप की भूमि में सभी अधिकारों का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है । $ .O. 3553. In pursuance of the clause ( a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers ( Oaths and fees) Act , 1948 (41 of 1948) the Central Government hereby authorize Smt . Renu Gautam , Assistant , Shri J. V. S.

9805 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

सं. का.आ. 2307 द्वारा संशोधित किया गया था , सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियुक्त किया गया है ।

अनुसूची

चत्ती बरियातु कोल माइनिंग खंड

उत्तर करनपुरा कोल फील्ड्स

जिला हजारीबाग , झारखंड राज्य सभी अधिकार

(क) राजस्व भूमि

क्रम ग्राम थाना थाना सं. जिला

टिप्पणी

कुल 1. इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक संख्या एन.टी.पी.सी. /सी.एम. /एस ई सी 7 ( 1 )/ चती बरियातु/07/01 तारीख 21-8-2007 का निरीक्षण महाप्रबन्धक , कोयला खनन , एन. टी.पी.सी.लि. , प्रथम तल , पी.डी.आई.एल. बिल्डिंग, सैक्टर -1 , नोएडा, उत्तर प्रदेश या अपर महाप्रबन्धक ( आई/सी ) , चत्ती बरियातु कोल माईनिंग प्रोजेक्ट , एन.टी.पी.सी. लिमिटेड , लक्ष्मी पैट्रोल पम्प के सामने , पुरानी बनारस रोड, नवाबगंज , हजारीबाग-825301 के कार्यालय में या मुख्य महाप्रबन्धक ( गवेषण संभाग ) , सैन्ट्रल माईन प्लानिंग एण्ड डिजाइन इंस्ट्टीयूट , गोदवाना प्लेस , कान्के रोड, रांची के कार्यालय में याकोयला नियंत्रक, 1 , कांउसिंल हाउस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता 700 001 के कार्यालय में या जिला कलक्टर हजारीबाग , झारखण्ड के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

सं का

क्षेत्रफल

नाम

(लगभग) हेक्टर एकड़ 2. उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है जिसमें निम्नलिखित उपबंध है: -

01 चत्ती केरादारी 14 हजारीबाग 185.38 457.89 भाग अर्जन के बाबत आक्षेपः-

बरियातु.

02जोरदाग केरादारी 15 हजारीबाग 161.72 399.45 भाग

03 पगार केरादारी 19 हजारीबाग 236.52 584.20 भाग

583.62 1441.54

कुल

8 ( 1 ) कोई व्यक्ति , जो किसी भूमि में , जिसकी बाबत धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचना निकाली गई है , हितबद्ध है , अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्हीं अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के बारे में आक्षेप कर सकेगा ।

(ख) वन भूमि

थाना सं. जिला

क्रम ग्राम थाना

कुल टिप्पणी

सं. का

क्षेत्रफल

नाम

(लगभग) स्पष्टीकरणः इस धारा के अर्थान्तर्गत यह आक्षेप नहीं माना जाएगा कि कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन संक्रियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संक्रियाएं केन्द्रीय सरकार या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नहीं करनी चाहिए ।

हेक्टर एकड़

01 चत्ती केरादारी 14 हजारीबाग 4.57 11.31 भाग

बरियातु

32.7480.87 भाग

02जोरदाग केसदारी 15 हजारीबाग

24.4060.26 भाग

03पगार केरादारी 19 हजारीबाग

61.71 152.44

कुल

संक्षिप्त विवरण

(क) कुल राजस्व भूमि : 583.62 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) = 1441.54 एकड़ (लगभग )

(2) धारा 8 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन प्रत्येक आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जाएगी और सक्षम प्राधिकारी आक्षेपकर्ता को स्वयं सुने जाने का या विधि व्यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसे सभी आक्षेपों को सुनने के पश्चात् और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जाँच , यदि कोई हो , करने के पश्चात् जो वह आवश्यक समझता है , वह या तो धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि के या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़ों या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आक्षेपों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार को उसके विनिश्चय के लिए देगा ।

(ख) कुल वन भूमि: 61.71 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) = 152.44 एकड़ (लगभग)

(ग) सकल योग ( क+ ख ): 645.33 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) = 1593.98 एकड़ (लगभग )

(3 ) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबद्ध समझा जाएगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होता, यदि भूमि या किसी ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर लिए जाते हैं ।

अर्जित किये जाने वाले राजस्व प्लाटों की सूची:

1. जोरदाग ग्राम से अर्जित किये जाने वाले प्लाटों की संख्या:2 ( भाग ) ,

4(भाग ) , 5 से 11 , 12( भाग ) , 13 से 449 , 450( भाग ) , 451 से

537( भाग ) , 538 ( भाग ) , 539( भाग ) , 540( भाग ) , 541 से 546,

458, 459( भाग ) , 460( भाग) ,462( भाग) , 466( भाग) , 468(भाग ) , 547( भाग ) , 548 से 561 , 562( भाग ) , 563 से 578 , 579( भाग ) , (4) कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काउंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट कोलकाता-700001 को, केन्द्रीय सरकार द्वारा भारत के राजपत्र भाग- II , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) तारीख 9 सिंतबर , 2006 में प्रकाशित अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 3629 , जिसके बाद भारत के राजपत्र भाग- II , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) तारीख 18-08-2007 में प्रकाशित अधिसूचना 9806

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

580 से 583 , 584 ( भाग ) , 585 से 587 , 588 ( भाग ) , 590 ( भाग ) , 591 ( भाग ) , 592( भाग) , 593 , 594( भाग ) , 595( भाग ) , 597( भाग ) , 608 ( भाग) , 609 , 610 , 611 ( भाग ) , 612( भाग ) , 622( भाग ) , 1031 ( भाग ) , 1032, 1033 , 1034, 1035 ( भाग ) , 1036( भाग ) , 1037( भाग) , 1038( भाग) , 1039, 1040, 1041 (भाग ) , 1042 ( भाग ) , 1043( भाग) , 1044( भाग ) , 1045( भाग ) , 1056( भाग ) , 1057( भाग ) , 1058( भाग ) , 1059 ( भाग ) , 1060 से 1282, 1283 ( भाग ) , 1284 से 1286, 1287 ( भाग ) , 1288 , 1289( भाग ) , 1290( भाग) , 1291 ( भाग ) , 1310 (भाग ) , 1665 ( भाग ) , 1682 ( भाग ) , 1685 ( भाग ) , 1686 से 1799, 1800 ( भाग ) , 1801 ( भाग ) , 1802 से 1851 , 1852 ( भाग ) , 1853 ( भाग ) , 1854( भाग ) , 208/1956, 1232/1958 , 1220/1959 , 1243/1960 , 177/2020, 2/2022 ( भाग ) , 4/2024 ( भाग ) । 2. पगार ग्राम में अर्जित किये जाने वाले प्लाटों की संख्याः [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

121( भाग ) , 122 से 1567 , 1568( भाग ) , 1569( भाग ) 1572( भाग ) , 1595 ( भाग ) , 1596( भाग ) , 1597 ( भाग ) , 1598 से 1719 , 1720( भाग ) , 1721 , 1722 , 1723 ( भाग ) , 1724( भाग) , 1725 ( भाग ) , 1909( भाग ) , 1910 ( भाग ) , 1911 ( भाग ) , 1912 से 1921 , 1922( भाग ) , 579/2017 , 561/2018 , 500/2019 , 744/2020 , 126/2069 ( भाग ) , 126/2070 ( भाग ) , 126/2071 ( भाग ) , 126/2072 ( भाग ) , 126/2073 , 126/2074, 126/2075 ( भाग ) , 126/2076 ( भाग ) , 126/2077 ( भाग ) , 126/2078 ( भाग ) , 126/2079 , 126/2080 , 126/2081 , 126/2082 , 126/2083 , 126/2084 , 126/2085 , 422/2086 , 422/2087 , 422/2088 , 422/2089 , 546/2090, 2090/2091 , 371/2092 1

धारा नं. 7 ( 1 ) के अधीन लागू क्षेत्र में वन प्लाटों की सूचीः

1. ग्राम चत्ती बरियातु में अर्जित किये जाने वाले प्लाटों की संख्या : 121

2. ग्राम पगार में अर्जित किये जाने वाले प्लाट की संख्या : 48 , 87, 135 , 136 , 666

3. ग्राम जोरदाग में अर्जित किये जाने वाले प्लाट की संख्या : 2 , 12,13 , 2024 और 2022

ऊपर वर्णित राजस्व प्लाटों में वन प्लाट पहले ही सम्मिलित किये गये हैं ।

धारा 7 ( 1 ) के अधीन क्षेत्र का सीमा वर्णन:-

रेखा क- का- क2-खः

यह रेखा ग्राम चत्ती बरियातु के उत्तरी- पश्चिमी सीमा के बिन्दु ' क' से प्रारम्भ होकर प्लाट सं. -121 से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु का पर पहुंचती है उसके पश्चात् यह रेखा आगे प्लाट सं. 4 से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु क2 तक बढ़ती है । उसके पश्चात् यह रेखा आगे उसी दिशा में बढ़ते हुए प्लाट सं. 2069, 2070 , 2071 , 2072 , 2073 , 2074 , 2075 , 2078 से गुजरती हुई उक्त गांव के उत्तरी- पूर्वी सीमा पर बिन्दु ' ख' पर समाप्त होती है ।

रेखा ख- गः

1 ( भाग ) , 3 ( भाग ) , 4( भाग ) , 5( भाग ) , 6 से 29, 30 ( भाग ) , 31 (भाग ) , 48( भाग ) , 49 से 67 , 68( भाग ) , 69 से 135 , 136( भाग ) , 137 से 277 , 278 ( भाग ) , 279 से 299 , 300 ( भाग ) , 301 से 322 , 324 से 641 , 642( भाग ) , 643 ( भाग ) , 648( भाग ) , 655 ( भाग ) , 662(भाग ) , 663 ( भाग ) , 664 ( भाग ), 666( भाग ) , 667, 668 (भाग ) , 669 ( भाग ) , 670 ( भाग ) , 722( भाग ) , 723 ( भाग ) , 724 ( भाग ) , 725 (भाग) , 726 से 733 , 734( भाग ) , 735, 736( भाग) , 745( भाग ) , 746(भाग ) , 747 , 748 , 749( भाग ) , 750 ( भाग ) , 751,752 ( भाग ) , 753( भाग ) , 755 ( भाग ) ,756 ( भाग ) , 757( भाग ) , 758 , 759( भाग ) , 760से 853 , 854( भाग ) , 855 ( भाग ) , 857 ( भाग ) , 858 , 859 ( भाग ) , 861 ( भाग ) , 862 ( भाग ) , 863 ( भाग ) , 864 , 865 , 866 , 867 , 868( भाग ) , 869 ( भाग ) , 870 ( भाग ) , 889( भाग ) , 890 ( भाग ) , 891 ( भाग ) , 894 ( भाग ) , 895 ( भाग ) , 896( भाग ) , 897 ( भाग ) , 898 ( भाग ) , 899( भाग ) , 900 , 901 ( भाग ) , 902 ( भाग ) , 903 , 904 , 905 ( भाग ) , 906 से 929 , 930 ( भाग ) , 931 ( भाग ) , 932 ( भाग ) , 933 से 1205 , 1206 ( भाग ) , 1207 ( भाग ) , 1208 ( भाग ) , 1209 से 1260 , 1261 ( भाग ) , 1262 , 1263 , 1264 , 1265 ( भाग ) , 1266 से 1273 , 1274( भाग ) , 1275 से 1652 , 1653 ( भाग ) , 1654 ( भाग ) , 1655 , 1656 , 1657 , 1658 ( भाग ) , 1668( भाग ) , 1669 ( भाग ) , 1670 (भाग) , 1671 ( भाग ) , 1715 ( भाग ) , 1716 , 1717 ( भाग ) , 1721 ( भाग ) , 1722 ( भाग ) , 1747 ( भाग ) , 1749( भाग ) , 1905 ( भाग ) , 1909 ( भाग ) , 1910 , 1911 , 1912( भाग ) , 1913 , 1914 ( भाग ) , 1931 ( भाग ) , 1932 , 1933 ( भाग ) , 1934 ( भाग ) , 2187 ( भाग ) , 2203 ( भाग ) , 2204 , 2205 ( भाग ) , 2206 ( भाग ) , 2207 ( भाग ) , 2222( भाग ) , 2223 ( भाग ) , 2226 ( भाग ) , 313/2927 , 396/2928 , 397/2929 , 405/2930 , 681/2931 , 1180/2932 , 1267/2933 , 599/2934 , 11/2981 , 73/2982 , 76/2983 , 76/2984 , 76/2985 , 76/2986 , 76/2987 , 76/2988 , 76/2989 , 76/2990 , 76/2991 , 87/2992, 87/2993 , 87/2994 , 87/2995 , 2994/2996 , 1148/3001 , 3001/3002 , 1101/3003 , 2995/3004 , 87/3005 ,668/3006 1 यह रेखा ग्राम पगार के उत्तरी- पश्चिमी सीमा के बिन्दु ' ख' से प्रारम्भ होकर प्लाट सं. 5 , 4 , 3 , 1 , 6, 30, 68 , 136 , 670 , 669 , 668 , 666, 664, 663 से गुजरती हुई उक्त ग्राम के उत्तरी - पूर्वी सीमा के बिन्दु ' ग ' पर समाप्त होती है।

रेखा ग -ग 1-ग2-ग3 -घः

3. चती बरियातु ग्राम में अर्जित किये जाने वाले प्लाटों की संख्याः

यह रेखा ग्राम पगार के उत्तरी- पूर्वी सीमा के बिन्दु ' ग ' से प्रारम्भ होती है , और दक्षिण की ओर मुड़कर 9807 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

'भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1, 1929

होकर प्लॉट सं. 1852 , 1851 , 1854 , 1853, 1854, 1665 , 1682 , 1801 , 1800, 1799 , 1685 , 1686 , 1291 , 1290 , 1287, 1310, 1056, 1058 , 1059 , 1045 , 1044, 1041 , 1042 , 1039, 1038 , 1037 , 1036 , 1035 , 1031, 450 , 458 , 459,460,462, 547,466, 547 , 540 , 539 , 537 , 538 , 579 , 595 , 594, 593 , 591 , 592, 590 , 584 , 588 , 608 , से उक्तग्राम के दक्षिणी पश्चिमी सीमा के बिन्दु' छ ' पर समाप्त होती है।

रेखा -ज

यह रेखा ग्राम जोरदाग के दक्षिणी- पश्चिमी सीमा के बिन्दु ' छ ' से प्रारंभ होकर उत्तर की ओर मुड़कर प्लाट सं.-612 , 611 , 562 , 622 , 2024, 12 , 2022 , 2 से गुजरती हुई उक्त ग्राम के उत्तरी सीमा में स्थित बिन्दु ' ज' पर समाप्त होती है ।

रेखा ज-क

प्लॉट सं. 662, 300 , 656, 655, 654, 346, 648, 642, 722, 723 , 724, 725, 734, 736, 759 , 757 , 756, 755, 753, 752,750, 745 , 749, 746, से होकर गुजरती हुई ग्राम- पगार में बिन्दु ग । तक बढ़ती है। इसके पश्चात् यह रेखा उक्त ग्राम में पूर्वी सीमा के साथ-साथ बढ़ते हुए प्लॉटः सं. 746, 747, 846, से गुजस्ती हुई किन्दु ग2 तक बढ़ती है। इसके पश्चात् यह रेखा पूर्व की तरफ बढ़ते हुए प्लाट सं. 846, 847, 853 और 855 से गुजरती हुईबिन्दु गः तक बढ़‌ती है। इसके पश्चात् यह रेखा दक्षिण की तरफा बढ़ते हुए ग्राम पगार के प्लाट सं. 856, 857, 859, 861, 862,863 , 869, 870, 868,889, 890, 891 , 894, 895 , 896, 899, 898 , 901 से होकर गुजरती हुई इसी ग्राम के प्लॉट सं. 902 पर बिन्दु ' ब ' पर समाप्त होती है।

यह रेखाःग्राप्तःजोरदाग के उत्तरी- पश्चिमीसीमा के बिन्दु ' ज ' से प्रारंभ होकर ग्राम चत्ती बरियातु के प्लाट सं.- 121 से गुजरती हुई उक्त ग्राम को उत्तरी पश्चिमी सीमा पर स्थित बिन्दु ' क' पर समाप्त होती है। ইঙ্গা ম-ত

[फा.सं. 43015/5/2006/ पी आर आई डब्ल्यू-1 ] एम. शाहबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF COAL

NewDelhi , the 13th December , 2007 बह रेखा ग्राम पगार के प्लॉट सं. 902पर स्थित बिन्दु ' घ ' से आरम्भ होकर प्लाट सं. 2226, 2223 , 2222 , 905, 2207, 2206, 2205 , 2203 , 930, 931 , 932 , 1206, 1207 , 1208,1210 , 1934, 1933, 1931 , 1261, 1914, 1912, 1909, 1905 , 1748, 1274, 1747, 1722 , 1721 , 1717, 1715 , 1671 , 1670 , 1669 , 1668, 1653 , 1654, 1658 , से गुजरती हुई उक्त ग्राम के पश्चिमी सीमा के बिन्दु ' ड़ ' पर समाप्त होती है।

रेखा उ-च

S.O. 3555.-Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry ofCoal & Mines (De- partment ofCoal) vide S.O. No. 2095 dated 20th July, 2007 issuedunder sub-section ( 1 ) of section 4 of the Coal Bear- ingArea (Acquisition & Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and pub- lished inPart II, Section-3 , sub-section (ii) ofthe Gazette of India dated 22-07-2007 at pages 4755 to 4756, the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in646.23 hectares (approximately) or 1596.18 Acres (approximately) , ofthe lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification.

Andwheras the Central Government is satisified that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands described in the schedules appended to this notification.

यह रेखा ग्राम चती बस्थिातु के दक्षिणी- पूर्वी सीमा के बिन्दु ' ङ' से प्रारंभ होकर प्लॉट सं. 1720, 1721, 1725, 1724, 1723 , 1709, 1910, 1910, 1911 , 1921 , 1922, 1597, 1596, 1995, 1266, 1572, 1565, 1569, 1568, से गुजस्ती हुई उक्त ग्राम के दक्षिणी पश्चिमी सीमा के बिन्दु ' च ' पर समाप्त होती है।

रेखा च-छ

Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferredby sub section (i ) of Section- 7 of the said Act, the Central Governmenthesaby gives notice of its intention to acquire the land measuring 645.33 hectares ( approximately) or 1593.98 Acres (approximately) in all rights in the schedule appendedhereto.

यह रेखा ग्राम जोरदाग के दक्षिणी- पूर्वी सीमा के बिन्दु ' च' से प्रारंभ

49:35G1/07-2 9808

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA I , 1929

LAND SCHEDULE

Chatti Bariatu Coal Mining Block North Karanpura Coal Fields District : Hazaribagh , Jharkhand State AllRights

(A) Revenue Land

Sl. Village Thana Thana District

No. No Total Remark Area

( Approx . )

Hectare. Acre.

1.Theplanbearing No. NTPC/CM/SEC7 ( 1 )/ CHATTI BARIATU/07/01 dated 21/08/07 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the office ofthe Gen- eralManager-Coal Mining, NTPC Ltd. ist floor , PDILBuild- ing, Sector- 1 , Noida, Uttar Pradesh or in the office ofAGM(I/ c), Chatti Bariatu Coal Mining Project, NTPC Ltd. Opposite Laxmi Petrol Pump, Old Benaras Road , Nawabganj , Hazaribag- 825301 or at the office of the Chief General Manager(Exploration Division), Central Mine Planning and Design Institute, Gondwana Place , Kanke Road, Ranchi or at the office the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street, Kolkata-700001 or in the office ofDistrict Collector, District Hazaribag, Jharkhand.

01. Chatti Keradari 14 Hazaribagh 185.38 457.89 Part bariatu

2. Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of Section 8 of the aforesaid Act which provides as follows:

15 Hazaribagh 161.72 399.45 Part

02. Jordag Keradari

Objection to Acquisition:

19 Hazaribagh 236.52 584.20 Part

03. Pagar Keradari

583.62 1441.54

Total

(B) ForestLand

8(1) Any person intrested in any land in respect of which a notification under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 7 has been issued may, within thirty days of the issue of the notification, object to the acquistion of the whole or any part ofthe land or of any rights in or over such land.

Sl. Village Thana Thana District No. No. Total Remark Area Explanation:

Hectare. Acre .

01. Chatti Keradari 14 Hazaribagh 4.57 11.31 Part bariatu

(1) It shall notbe an objection within the meaning of the section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operation in the land for the production ofthe coal and those operations should not be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person .

02. Jordag Keradari 15 Hazaribagh 32.74 80.87 Part 03. Pagar Keradari 19 Hazaribagh 24.40 60.26 Part

Total

61.71 152.44

Summary:

(A) Total Revenue Land: 583.62 hectares (Approximately) = 1441.54 acres (Approximately)

(B) Total Forest Land: 61.71 hectares ( Approximately) = 152.44 acres (Approximately)

List of Revenue Plots to be Acquired

1. Plot Nos to be acquired in village Jordag:

(2) Every Objection under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 8 shall be made to the Competent Authority in writing and the CompetentAuthority shall give the objector an oppor- tunity ofbeing heard either in person or by a leagal practi- tioner and shall , after hearing all such objections and after making such further enquiry , ifany, as he thinks necessary, either makes a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub- section ( 1 ) ofSection 7 or of rights in or over such land, or make diffreent reports in respect of different parcels of such lands or of rights in or over such land, tothe Central Government containing his recommen- dation on the objections together with the record of pro- ceedings held by him for the decision of the Government .

(3) For the purpose this Section, a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land where acquired under this Act .

2(Part) , 4 ( Part ) , 5 to 11 , 12( Part ) , 13 to 449, 450 ( Part ) , 451 to 458 , 459 (Part ) , 460 ( Part ) , 462( Part ) , 466( Part ) , 468 ( Part ) , 537 (Part ) , 538 ( Part ) , 539 ( Part ) , 540 ( Part ) , 541 to 546 , 547( Part ) , 548 to561 , 562( Part ) , 563 से 578 , 579( Part ) , 580 to 583 , 584 ( Part ) , 585 to 587 , 588 ( Part ) , 590 ( Part ) , 591 ( Part ) , 592 ( Part ) , 593 , 594 ( Part ) , 595 ( Part ) , 597 ( Part ) , 608 ( Part ) , 609 , 610 , 611 ( Part ) , 612( Part ) , 622 ( Part ) , 1031 ( Part ) , 1032, 1033 , 1034 , 1035( Part) , 1036( Part ), 1037 ( Part ) , 1038 ( Part ) , 1039 , 1040, 1041 (Part ) , 1042 ( Part ), 1043 ( Part ) , 1044 ( Part ) , 1045 ( Part ) , 1056 ( Part ) , 1057 ( Part ) , 1058 ( Part ) , (4) The Coal Controller , I , Council House Street, Kolkata- 700001 , has been appointed by the Central Gov- emment as the Competent Authority under Section 3 of the said Act vide notification number S.O. 3629 , published inpart- II , Section 3, sub- section ( ii ) of the Gazette of India dated the 9th September , 2006, which was subsequently amended vide number S.O 2307 published in part- II Sec- tion 3 , sub-section ( ii) of Gazette of India dated the 18th August, 2007.

9809 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

126/2072 ( Part ) , 126/2073 ( Part) , 126/2074 ( Part ) , 126/2075(Part ) ,126/2076, 126/2077 ( Part ) , 126/2078 (Part ), 126/2079 ( Part ) , 126/2080 , 126/2081 , 126/2082 , 126/2083,126/2084( Part ) , 126/2085, 422/2086, 422/2087 , 422/2088, 422/2089 , 546/2090 2090/2091 , 371/2092. 1059( Part ) , 1060 to 1282, 1283 ( Part) , 1284 to 1286, 1287( Part ) , 1288 , 1289( Part) , 1290( Part ) , 1291 ( Part ) , 1310( Part ) , 1665 ( Part ) , 1682( Part ) , 1685( Part ) , 1686 to1799, 1800( Part ) , 1801 ( Part ) , 1802 to 1851 , 1852(Part ) , 1853( Part) , 1854( Part ) , 208/1956, 1232/1958 , 1220/1959 , 1243/1960, 177/2020, 2/2022( Part) , 4/2024( Part) .

List of Forest Plots in the area applied u/s 7 (1 ) :

2.Plot Nos. to be acquired in village Pagar:

1. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Chattibariatu : 121 . 2. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Pagar: 48, 87, 135,136and666.

3.Plot numberstobe acquired in village Jordag: 2, 12, 13 , 2024 and 2022.

The above forest plots are already inculded in above inentioned revenue plots.

BoundaryDescription of the Block Area to be notifed u/s 7 (1) :

Line A-A1 -A2-B : ..

The line starts from point 'A' atthe north -west corner ofthe village ' Chattibariatu' passing through the Plot Nos. 121 upto point Al , it moves further through plot No.4 upto point A2 and moves further in the same direction through plot Nos . 2069, 2070,2071 , 2072 , 2073, 2074, 2075, 2078 and ends at the points ' B' on the north- east boundary of the said village.

LineB-C:

The line starts from point 'B' atthe north-west boundary of the village Pagar and passing through the plot Nos . 5, 4, 3 , 1 , 6,30,68, 136,670, 669,668,666 , 664, 663 and end at the point 'C' on the north - east of boundary corner of the said village.

LineC-C1 -C2 -C3 -D:

1 ( Part) , 3 ( Part ) , 4(Part ) ; 5( Part ) , 6 to 29 , 30( Part ) , 31 (Part) , 48 ( Part ) , 49 to 67 , 68( Part ) , 69 to 135 , 136( Part ) , 137 to 277 , 278 (Part ) , 279 to299, 300(Part ) , 301 to 322 , 324 to 641 , 642 (Part ) , 643 (Part ) , 648 (Part) , 655( Part ) , 662( Part ) , 663( Part ) , 664( Part ) , 666 ( Part ) , 667, 668 ( Part ) , 669 ( Part ) , 670 ( Part ) , 722 ( Part ) , 7:23( Part ) , 724( Part ) , 725( Part ) , 726 to 733 , 734 (Part ) , 735, 736(Part) , 745( Part) , 746( Part ) , 747 , 748,749 (Part) , 7:50( Part) , 751,752( Part ), 753( Part ) , 755(Part ) , 756(Part) , 757( Part ) , 758 , 759( Part ) , 760 to 853 , 854( Part ) , 855 ( Part ) , 857 ( Part ) , 858 , 859( Part ), 861 ( Part ) , 862(Part ) , 863 (Part ) , 864 , 865 , 866 , 867 , 868 ( Part ) , 869(Part ) , 870 ( Part ) , 889 ( Part ) , 890( Part ) 891 ( Part ) , 894( Part ) , 895 ( Part) , 896( Part ) , 898 ( Part ) , 899 ( Part ) , 900, 901 ( Part ), 902( Part ) , 903 , 904 , 905( Part) 906 to 929 , 930( Part ) , 931 ( Part ) , 932( Part) , 933 to 1205 , 1206( Part ) , 1207 ( Part ) , 1208( Part ) , 1209 to 1260 , 1261 ( Part ) , 1262 , 1263 , 1264, 1265 ( Part ) , 1266 to 1273 , 1274( Part ) , 1275 to1652 , 1653 ( Part ) , 1654( Part ) , 1655 , 1656,1657 , 1658 ( Part ) , 1668 ( Part ) , 1669 ( Part ) , 1670( Part ) , 1671 ( Part ) , 1715 ( Part ) , 1716, 1717 (Part ) , 1721 ( Part ) , 1722( Part ) , 1747 ( Part ) , 1749 ( Part ) , 1905 ( Part ) , 1909 (Part ) , 1910 , 1911 , 1912( Part ) , 1913 , 1914( Part ) , 1931 ( Part ) , 1932, 1933 ( Part) , 1934( Part ) , 2187 ( Part ) , 2203( Part ) , 2204 , 2205 ( Part ) , 2206(Part ) , 2207 ( Part ) , 2222 ( Part ) , 2223 ( Part ) , 2226( Part ) , 313/2927, 396/2928 , 397/2929 , 405/2930 , 681/2931 , 1180/2932 , 1267/2933 , 599/2934 , 11/2981 , 73/2982 , 76/2983 , 76/2984 , 76/2985 , 76/2986 , 76/2987 , 76/2988 , 76/2989 , 76/2990 , 76/2991 , 87/2992, 87/2993 , 87/2994 , 87/2995 , 2994/2996 , 1148/3001 , 3001/3002 , 1101/3003 , 2995/3004 , 87/3005 , 668/3006.

The line starts from point ' C" at the north-east of village Pagar moves southwards through the plots No. 662, 300,656, 655, 654,346,648,642, 722, 723 , 724, 725 , 734 , 736 , 759,757,756,755,753,752,750, 3. Plots. Nos. to be acquired In village Chatti Bariatu:

745, 749, 746, ofvillage Pagar uptopointCl thereafter the line moves along the eastern boundary of the same village through plot Nos . 746, 747 , 846 upto point C2 and then it moves towards East upto point C3 through piot 121 (Part) , 122 to 1567, 1568 (Part ), 1569(Part) 1572 (Part) , 1595 ( Part ) , 1596( Part ) , 1597 ( Part ) , 1598 to 1719 , 1720 ( Part ) , 1721 , 1722 , 1723 ( Part ) , 1724( Part ) , 1725 ( Part ) , 1909 ( Part ) , 1910( Part ) , 1911 ( Part ) , 1912 to1921 , 1922 ( Part ) , 579/2017 , 561/2018 , 500/2019 , 744/2020, 126/2069 ( Part ) , 126/2070 ( Part ) , 126/2071 ( Part ) , 9810

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

nos .846,847,853 and855. The line further moves southward through plot nos . 856,857, 859, 861,862,863,869,870,868,889, 890, 891,894,895,896, 899, 898, 901, ofvillage Pagar and ends atpoint ' D' on the plot no.902 ofthe said village.

LineD-E:

The line starts from point 'D' at the Plot no . 902 of the Village Pagar passing through the plot nos . 2226, 2223 , 2222, 905,2207, 2206,2205,2203,930, 931,932, 1206, 1207, 1208, 1210, 1934, 1933 , 1931 , 1261 , 1914 , 1912, 1909, 1905, 1748, 1274, 1747, 1722 , 1721 , 1717 , 1715 , 1671 , 1670, 1669 , 1668, 1653 , 1654, 1658 and ends at the point ' E ' on the western boudary of said village.

LineE -F:

Theline starts from point 'E' at the south - east boundary of the village Chattibariatu passing through the plot nos. 1720 , 1721 , 1725, 1724, 1723, 1709 , 1910 , 1911 , 1921 , 1922 , 1597, 1596, 1595, 1266, 1572, 1565 , 1569, 1568, and ends at the point ' F' on the South- West ofthe said village.

LineF-G:

The line starts from line ' F'near the south - east

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)]

boundary of village Jordag passing though the plot nos .

1852 , 1851 , 1854, 1853, 1854, 1665, 1682, 1801, 1800, 1799, 1685 , 1686, 1291 , 1290, 1287, 1310, 1056, 1058, 1059, 1045, 1044, 1041 , 1042, 1039, 1038, 1037, 1036, 1035, 1031,450,458, 459,460,462,547,466,547,540, 539,537,538,579,595,594,593, 591 , 592 , 591,590,584, 588 , 608, and ends at point ' G' near the south-west boundary of thevillage Jordag.

LineG-H:

The line starts from ' G' at the south -west corner of the village Jordag moves northwards through the plot nos . 612, 611 , 562, 622, 2024, 12, 2022, 2 of the said village and end at the point'H' on the north corner of the said village.

LineH -A:

The line starts from point 'H' atthe north-westboundary of thevillage Jordag and passing through thePlot no.. 121 ofthe village Chattibariatu ends at the point ' A' on the north- west corner of the village Chattibariatu.

[F. No. 43015/5/2006/PRIW-I ] M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy.

पर्यावरण एवं वन मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 12 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3556.-सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, 2005 की धारा 5 ( 1 ) / धारा 19 ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए पर्यावरण एवं वन मंत्रालय के निम्नलिखित अधिकारियों को उनके नाम के सामने दर्शाए गए विनिर्दिष्ट विषय - वस्तु के संदर्भ में केन्द्रीय लोक सूचना अधिकारियों/अपीलीय प्राधिकरणों आदि के रूप में नामोदिष्ट किया जाता है :-

1. उपरोक्त अधिनियम की धारा 5 ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत केन्द्रीय लोक सूचना अधिकारियों के रूप में नामोदिष्ट किए गए उप वन महानिरीक्षक/निदेशक/ अपर निदेशक/उप सचिव/सहायक वन महानिरीक्षक स्तर के अधिकारी ।

पदनाम

क्र. सं.

दूरभाष सं.

(3) (2)

(1)

श्रीमती रेखा पई उप वन महानिरीक्षक

विषय-वस्तु

(4)

दूरभाष सं. 24362875

[email protected]

इंटरकॉम सं. 515

श्री जे . वी. शर्मा उप वन महानिरीक्षक

वन सुरक्षा विभाग और संयुक्त वन प्रबंध (जे एफ एम) प्रकोष्ठ , जलवायु परिवर्तन पर संयुक्त राष्ट्र फ्रेमवर्क कन्वेंशन (यूएन एफ सीसी सी ) के अंतर्गत एल यू एल यूसी एफ

दूरभाष सं. 24360549

[email protected]

इंटरकॉम सं. 520

वन नीति , एन एफ ए पी , वन अंतरराष्ट्रीय सहयोग ( एफ आई सी ) और राष्ट्रीय वन आयोग (एन एफ सी) [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

9811

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22, 2007/पौच 1 , 1929

(2)

(1)

(3) 3.

श्रीबिपिन बिहारी

दूरभाष सं. 24360704 उप वन महानिरीक्षक

[email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 503 4.

श्री ए. के. जौहरी

दूरभाष सं. 24364624 उप वन

[email protected] महानिरीक्षक( आर टी) इंटरकॉम सं. 513 5.

श्री सीडी सिंह

दूरभाष सं. 24363984 सहायक वन

cdsingh.1987@ महानिरीक्षक

rediffmail.com

इंटरकॉम सं. 523 6.

श्री उमाकांत

दूरभाष सं. 24363974 सहायक वन

ukant [email protected] महानिरीक्षक

इंटरकॉम सं. 517 7.

श्री ए के जोशी

दूरभाष सं. 24363970 सहायक वन

महानिरीक्षक

[email protected] aditya44@ hotmail.com इंटरकॉम सं. 512 8.

दूरभाष सं. 24362416 श्री संजय कुमार

उप-वन महानिरीक्षक

skumar_ifs@ yahoo.co.in

इंटरकॉम सं..705 9.

श्रीडी. जैना

दूरभाष सं. 24362497 सहायक वन

debasisjana2002@

rediffmail.com महानिरीक्षक

इंटरकॉम सं. 706 10.

श्रीडी. जैना

दूरभाष सं. 24362497 सहायक वन

महानिरीक्षक

debasisjana2002@ rediffimail.com इंटरकॉम सं. 706 11.

दूरभाष सं. 24362813 श्री अनमोल कुमार

उप वन

[email protected] महानिरीक्षक

इंटरकॉम सं. 519 (4)

सर्वेक्षण और उपयोग , आई टी टी ओ

वानिकी अनुसंधान और प्रशिक्षण एशिया पेसिफिक फारेस्ट इनवेजन नेटवर्क ( ए पी एफ आई एस एन ) इन्टरनेशनल नेटवर्क फार बैम्बू एण्ड रेटन ( आई एन बी ए आर ) भारतीय वानिकी अनुसंधान और शिक्षा परिषद् ( आई सी एफ आर ई ) देहरादून, भारतीय वन सर्वेक्षण ( एफ एस आई ) देहरादून , इन्दिरा गांधी राष्ट्रीय वन अकादमी ( आई जी एन एफ ए ) देहरादून , वन शिक्षा निदेशालय ( डी एफ ई) देहरादून के प्रशासनिक और वित्तीय मामले तथा भारतीय प्लाईवुड उद्योग अनुसंधान और प्रशिक्षण संस्थान (आई पी आई आर टी आई) , बंगलौर तथा भारतीय वन प्रबंध संस्थान ( आई आई एफ एम) भोपाल के सभी मामले । वन संरक्षण [वन (संरक्षण) अधिनियम, 1980]

वन संरक्षण

: एफ.पी.डी. के मौजूदा काम के अतिरिक्त ई.ए.पी. /एन.ई. प्रकोष्ठ से संबंधित कार्य [चन ( संरक्षण) अधिनियम, 1980 ]

एन ए ई बी , एफ डी ए/एन ए पी ( 12 राज्य) : वनीकरण से संबंधित नीतिगत मामले , 20 सूत्रीय कार्यक्रम , एम एण्ड ई कम्यूनिकेशन एण्ड यूनाईटेड नेशन कन्वेंशन टू काम्बैट डैजरटिफिकेशन (यूएन सी सी डी)

एफ डी ए/एन ए पी ( 10 राज्य ) हरित भारत स्कीम , वम ग्राम स्कीम का विकास , ग्राम वन योजना स्कीम और राष्ट्रीय वनीकरण और पारि-विकास बोर्ड ( एन ए ई बी ) के लिए सहायता अनुदान एम ए ई बी , एफ डी ए/एन ए पी (6 राज्य) एन ए पीफार्म लैंड पर वृक्षारोपण और सी ई एम डी ई से संबंधित नीतिगत मामले

चिड़ियाघर प्राधिकरण , वन्यजीव राष्ट्रीय बोर्ड , वन्यजीव , वन्यजीव क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय विश्व-धरोहर कन्वेंशन , राष्ट्रीय प्राणि-विज्ञान उद्यान , केन्द्रीय अन्तरराष्ट्रीय संरक्षण संघ से संबंधित मामले । प्रवासी प्रजातियों पर कन्वेंशन , यूनेस्को 9812

(1)

(2)

12.

डा. आर हसन निदेशक ( वैज्ञानिक) 13.

श्री प्रमोद कृष्णनन संयुक्तनिदेशक (वन्यजीव)

14.

श्री गंगा सिंह संयुक्तनिदेशक 15.

राव मुरलीधर चाकिलम , निदेशक

16.

श्री सतीश अग्रवाल ,

निदेशक

17.

श्री सुरेन्द्र कुमार, निदेशक

18.

श्रीविजय कुमार, निदेशक ( सतर्कता) 19.

श्री जे एल चुध

निदेशक

20.

श्री संजीव स्वरूप, निदेशक

21.

श्री बी सिक्का, निदेशक ( वैज्ञानिक) 22.

श्री योगेश शर्मा, निदेशक ( वैज्ञानिक)

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

(4)

(3)

वन्यजीव प्रबन्ध मामले

दूरभाष सं. 24360734

[email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 740

दूरभाष सं. 24361795 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 717

वन्यजीव , संकटापन्न प्रजातियों पर अन्तरराष्ट्रीय व्यापार पर कन्वेंशन ( साईटस ) , हाथी परियोजना, राष्ट्रीय उद्यान और अभयारण्य

राष्ट्रीय बाघ संरक्षण प्राधिकरण ( एन टी सी ए ) से संबंधित सभी मामले

दूरभाष सं. 23389883 [email protected]

ए जी एम यू टी संवर्ग को छोड़कर भारतीय वन सेवा संवर्ग प्रबन्धन

दूरभाष सं. 24360772 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 435

प्रशासन और लोक शिकायत निपटान क्षतिपूर्ति प्रकोष्ठ, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों की स्थापना- पदों का सृजन और उन्हें जारी रखना

skagrawalsatish@ yahoo.co.in [email protected] इंटरकॉभ सं. 505

सामान्य प्रशासन और संसद एफ सी मामले/ क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों और सी पी डिवीजन का वित्त दूरभाष सं. 24361613 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 116

सतर्कता मामले

दूरभाष सं. 24366841

[email protected]

इंटरकॉम सं. 535

वन स्थापना

दूरभाष सं. 224364303 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 918

दूरभाष सं. 24368442 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 140

राष्ट्रीय नदी संरक्षण निदेशालय ( एन आर सी डी) प्रशासन, आई सी और प्रशिक्षण बजट का समन्वय , वार्षिक योजना , संसदीय मामलों/ समितियों का समन्वय , एन आर सी ए की समितियां, संसद प्रश्नों सहित एन आर सी/पी/जी ए पी का समन्वय कार्य , सामान्य प्रकृति के मामले जिनमें समन्वय की आवश्यकता है, यमुना कार्य योजना का समन्वय , प्रचार , जन भागीदारी और मीडिया के कार्य

दूरभाष सं. 24365020

[email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 122

उत्तर- प्रदेश , पंजाब , हिमाचल प्रदेश , हरियाणा और राजस्थान के एन आर सी पी कार्य 1. जे आई सी ए अध्ययन का पूर्ण समन्वय II. जम्मूऔर कश्मीर के राष्ट्रीय झील संरक्षण योजना कार्य

केरल , गोवा और उत्तराखंड का राष्ट्रीय नदी संरक्षण कार्य और उत्तराखंड के राष्ट्रीय झील संरक्षण योजना कार्य

दूरभाष सं. 24366008 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 141 9813

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1,1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(2)

(3) (1)

23.

डा. (श्रीमती)

(4)

दूरभाष सं. 24364789

[email protected]

इंटरकॉम सं. 142

आर. दलवानी , निदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

24.

(क) राष्ट्रीय झील संरक्षण योजना समन्वय और जम्मूकाश्मीर उत्तराखंड और पश्चिम बंगाल को छोड़कर अन्य सभी राज्यों के राष्ट्रीय झील संरक्षण योजना कार्य

(ख) अनुसंधान और विकास परियोजनाएं (ग ) सेडीमेन्टस और विश्लेषणात्मक गुणवत्ता नियंत्रण सहित राष्ट्रीय नदी संरक्षण योजना के अंतर्गत नदियों की जल गुणवत्ता मानीटरिंग (घ ) सीवेज शोधन सयंत्रों की कार्यनिष्पादन मानिटरिंग

तमिलनाडु, दिल्ली और पश्चिम बंगाल के राष्ट्रीय नदी संरक्षण कार्य , और पश्चिम बंगाल के राष्ट्रीय झील संरक्षण योजना कार्य

दूरभाष सं. 24368526

Ikapoor [email protected]

इंटरकॉम सं. 143

श्री ललित कपूर, अपर निदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

25.

गुजरात , महाराष्ट्र बिहार झारखंड और आंध्र प्रदेश के राष्ट्रीय नदी संरक्षण कार्य

दूरभाष सं. 24363869

[email protected]

इंटरकॉम सं. 133

श्री राजीव सिन्हा अपरनिदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

26.

उड़ीसा पूर्वोत्तर राज्य, एम आर , छत्तीसगढ़ और कर्नाटक के राष्ट्रीय नदी संरक्षण कार्य

दूरभाष सं. 24363007

[email protected]

इंटरकॉम सं. 118

श्री बी बी बर्मन , अपरनिदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

27.

डा. एसकौल, निदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

रामसर कन्वेशन और राष्ट्रीय नमभूमि संरक्षण कार्यक्रम , एस ए सी ओ एन , उत्कृष्टता केन्द्र के रूप में

दूरभाष सं. 24360492

26178917 (R) kaul52@

yahoo.com

इंटरकॉम सं. 602

28.

श्री विवेक सक्सेना, निदेशक

दूरभाष सं. 24367077 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 431 29.

श्री आर के सेठी, निदेशक

दूरभाष सं. 24362252 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 135 30.

दूरभाष सं. 24367640 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 739 डा. जगराम , निदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

31.

दूरभाष सं. 24363962 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 546 डा. जे आर भट्ट, निदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

-गोविन्द बल्लभ पंत हिमालयी पर्यावरण विकास संस्थान ( जी बी पी एच आई ई डी) और एकीकृत पर्वत विकास के लिए अन्तरराष्ट्रीय केन्द्र (आई सी आई एम ओ डी ) भारतीय वन सेवा का ए जी एम यू टी संवर्ग और भारतीय वन सेवा अधिकारियों की वार्षिक गोपनीय रिपोर्ट प्रकोष्ठ जलवायु परिवर्तन ( सीसी ) ( सी डी एम और यू एन एफ सी सी सी सहित ) ग्लोबल वार्मिंग और क्योटो प्रोटोकोल

प्रदूषण नियंत्रण ( सी पी ) पर्यावरणीय प्राधिकरण पारि-नगर प्रदूषण पुरस्कार

तटीय अधिनियम जोन , ए आई सी ओ पी टी ए के अतिरिक्त प्रवाल भित्तियां और कच्छवनस्पति वर्गिकी में क्षमता निर्माण पर समान्वित परियोजना , मेडिसिनल प्लान फाऊडेंशन फार रिवाइटलाइजेशन आफ लोकल हेल्थ ट्रेडिशन ( एफ आर एल एच टी ) पर सी ई एस और वर्गिकी पर जानकी अमल राष्ट्रीय पुरस्कार 9814

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

(1)

(2)

(3)

32.

दूरभाष सं. 24642176 [email protected] डा. ए दुराईस्वामी, निदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

33.

दूरभाष सं. 24363964

[email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 530 डा. श्री ( श्रीमती ) रंजनी वारियर, निदेशक ( वैज्ञानिक)

34.

श्री जय नारायणं , निदेशक

दूरभाष सं. 24361952 इंटरकॉम सं. 625 35.

डा. जीवी सुब्रहमण्यम, निदेशक ( वैज्ञानिक)

दूरभाष सं. 24364594 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 601 36.

डॉ. एस के अग्रवाल

निदेशक

दूरभाष सं. 24362434 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 545 (वैज्ञानिक)

37.

डॉ. पी एल अहुजाराय दूरभाष सं. 24363973 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 174 निदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

38.

दूरभाष सं. 24360795 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 516 श्री भारत भूषण, निदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

39.

डॉ. टी चांदनी निदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

दूरभाष सं. 24363963 t.chand [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 172 40.

दूरभाष सं. 24360783 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 906 श्री आर.सी. मीना निदेशक (ई ई)

41 .

दूरभाष सं. 24363677 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 927 डॉ. नसीम अहमद , निदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

42.

श्री अशोक भाटिया, निदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

दूरभाष सं. 24367625 forabhatia@yah 00.com इंटरकॉम सं. 552

[PART II-SBC. 3 ( ii) ] (4)

ओजोन सेल और मान्ट्रियल प्रोटोकोल

आनुवंशिक इंजीनियरिंग अनुमोदन समिति (जीईएसी ) और जैव सुरक्षा प्रोटोकोल हिंदी (राजभाषा)

पर्यावरणीय प्रभाव मूल्यांकन अधिसूचना से संबंधित और सभी सामान्य मामले और तेल , गैस और पेट्रोलियम तथा डिस्टीलरी सेक्टर के अलावा सभी औद्योगिक परियोजनाएं

प्रभाव मूल्यांकन ( आई ए) ताप विद्युत परियोजनाएं खनन परियोजनाएं तथा नाभिकीय विद्युत परियोजनाएं

प्रभाव मूल्यांकन ( आई ए) आंध्र प्रदेश , कर्नाटक, केरल , तमिलनाडु, गोवा, चण्डीगढ़ और महाराष्ट्र में गैर कोयला खनन परियोजनाएं और तेल गैस और पेट्रोलियम और डिस्टीलरीज सेक्टर की औद्योगिक परियोजनाएं

प्रभाव मूल्यांकन (आई ए ) महाराष्ट्र और हरियाणा को छोड़कर सभी राज्यों में निर्माण परियोजनाएं प्रभाव मूल्यांकन ( आई ए ) -कोयला खनन परियोजनाएं

राष्ट्रीय हरित दल/पारि- क्लब प्रदर्शनियों/मेलों में मंत्रालय और उसके संबंधित अधिकारियों की भागीदारी अन्य जागरूकता कार्यक्रमों के लिए वित्त सहायता की मंजूरी प्रशिक्षण कार्यक्रमों के आयोजन के लिए वित्त सहायता की मंजूरी

पारि- प्रणाली अनुसंधान कार्यक्रम और पूर्वी तथा पश्चिमी घाट अनुसंधान कार्यक्रम , संरक्षण और प्राकृतिक संसाधनों के सतत् उपयोग और संरक्षण के लिए विशेषज्ञ प्रकरण समूह ( ए और बी ) पर्यावरण अनुसंधान कार्यक्रम ( ई आर पी ) , आर्थिक और सामाजिक पर्यावरणीय मुद्दों से संबंधित अनुसंधान प्रस्ताव , प्रदूषण की रोकथाम, उपशमन और नियंत्रण के लिए विशेषज्ञ प्रकरण समूह , आर्थिक और सामाजिक मुद्दों पर विशेषज्ञ प्रकरण समूह 9815

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष1, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

(3) (1)

(2)

43.

clihanda -c@yahoo. com

डॉ. ( श्रीमती ) चन्दा चौधरी , निर्देशक, (वैज्ञानिक)

44.

डॉ. एम. सुब्बा राव, निदेशक, (वैज्ञानिक)

दूरभाष सं. 24361410 wowsubbarao@yah oo.co.in इंटरकॉम सं. 738 45.

दूरभाष सं. 24360270 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 117 डॉ. ( श्रीमती ) मंजू रैना, अपरनिदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

46.

इंटरकॉम सं. 556 दूरभाष सं. 24366347 [email protected] श्री आर.एन. जिंदल , अपर निदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

47.

डॉ. एस. भौमिक, अपरनिदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

दूरभाष सं. 24362827 [email protected] . nic.in इंटरकॉम सं. 539 48.

दूरभाष सं. 24360789 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 144 डॉ. के. सी. राठौर , अपर निदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

49.

श्री एस. जगन्नाथन , निदेशक

दूरभाष सं. 24360678 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 522 50.

दूरभाष सं. 24360588 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 725 श्री ए. अंदीश्वरन , सुपरीटेंडेट इंजीनियर (सीसीयू)

51.

दूरभाष सं. 24364593 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 558 डॉ. ई.वी. मूले , अपरनिदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

52.

डॉ. आर.के. राय , अपरनिदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

दूरभाष सं. 24367669 ( 0 ) 2625098(R) [email protected] इंटरकाम सं. 612 4935G1/07-3

(4)

अधिकतम दुर्घटना जोखिम ( एम ए एच ) इकाई मेंरासायनिक सुरक्षा

जैव चिकित्सा अपशिष्ट प्रबंधन ( प्रबंधन एवं हथालन ) नियमावली, खतरनाक अपशिष्ट (प्रबंधन एवं हथालन ) नियमावली, बैटरीज (प्रबंधन एवं हथालन ) नियमावली, खतरनाक अपशिष्टों की सीमापार आवाजाही के नियंत्रण पर बेसन कन्वेंशन और खतरनाक अपशिष्टों पर स्थायी समिति

प्रदूषण नियंत्रण (सीपी) जल गुणवत्ता , प्रयोगशालाओं और औद्योगिक प्रदूषण की पहचान

प्रदूषण नियंत्रण (सीपी) वायु प्रदूषण , वाहनीय और ध्वनि प्रदूषण प्रभाव आकलन (आई ए) नदी घाटी क्षेत्र ( सिंचाई और पन विद्युत परियोजना ) पारिस्थितिकी संवेदी क्षेत्र अधिसूचना

प्रभाव आकलम (आई ए) महाराष्ट्र और हरियाणा में निर्माण परियोजनाएं पर्यावरण और एन आर सी डी पर एकीकृत वित्त प्रभाग

कार्यालय भवनों, प्रयोगशालाओं, भवनों , आवासीय क्वार्टरों, वनस्पति संग्रहालयों , संग्रहालयों, मंत्रालय के अधीनस्थ कार्यालयों का भू- दृश्य जैसे योजना और निर्माण कार्य भारतीय वनस्पति सर्वेक्षण ( बी एस आई ) , भारतीय प्राणी सर्वेक्षण (जेड एस आई ) , भारतीय गणतंत्र का वानस्पतिक उद्यान (बी जी आई आर)

-राष्ट्रीय जैव- विविधता प्राधिकरण ( एन बी ए) , मानक और जैव-मंडल कार्यक्रम ( एम ए बी पी ) और अतुलनीय मूल्य विनियमों की सत्ता, यू एन डी पी- सी सी एफ II परियोजना अर्थात् (क) औषधीय पौधे और

(ख) समुदाय सहभागिता के जरिए जैव विविधता संरक्षण , सी ई एस/आई आई एस सी बंगलौर, वानस्पति उद्यानों को सहायता 9816

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/ PAUSA 1 , 1929

(2)

(1)

(3) 53.

दूरभाष सं. 24361601 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 737 डॉ. सुजाता अरोड़ा, अपरनिदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

54.

दूरभाष सं. 24367668 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 550 डॉ. पी.बी. रस्तोगी, अपरनिदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

55.

दूरभाष सं. 24367663 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 914 डॉ. एम. होता, अपर निदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

56.

दूरभाष सं. 24364595 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 743 डॉ. एम. सलाहुद्दीन , अपर निदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

57.

दूरभाष सं. 24360694 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 744 डॉ. सेंथिल वेल , अपर निदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

58.

दूरभाष सं. 24362755 इंटरकॉम सं. 614 श्री. ईश्वर सिंह , वरिष्ठ कानून अधिकारी

59.

डॉ. सरोज , अपरनिदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

दूरभाष सं. 24364067 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 751 60.

श्रीमती सुजाता खापरड़े , अपरनिदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

दूरभाष सं. 24360379 sujata [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 557 61.

श्रीमती रीता खन्ना , अपरनिदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

दूरभाष सं. 24367664 rita_khanna_2000@yahoo . com इंटरकॉम सं. 176/173 62.

दूरभाष सं. 24367670 इंटरकॉम सं. 743 डॉ. ए.के. त्यागी , अपरनिदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ) (4)

जैव विविधता पर कन्वेंशन ( सी बी डी) , और राष्ट्रीय जैव विविधता रणनीति और कार्य योजना ( एन बी एस ए पी ) प्रभाव मूल्यांकन ( उद्योग )

जैव सुरक्षा और पर्यावरणीय स्वास्थ्यपर क्षमता निर्माण परियोजना

स्वच्छ उत्पादन/स्वच्छ प्रौद्योगिकी

तटीय विनियमन जोन ( सी आर जेड) और संरचना परियोजनाएं

विधिक प्रकोष्ठ

विश्व बैंक औद्योगिक विकास क्षमता परियोजना,

रोटर डेम कनवेंशन

पर्यावरण शिक्षा केन्द, अहमदाबाद

सी पी आर पर्यावरणीय शिक्षा केन्द्र , चेन्नई नए उत्कृष्ट केन्द्रों को स्थापित करना राष्ट्रीय पर्यावरणीय जागरूकता अभियान (एन ई एसी)

पर्यावरण कार्यक्रम को लाभान्वित करने के लिएग्लोबल लर्निंग और ओबजरवेशन्स

एम एच आर डी , एन सी ई आर टी और राज्य शिक्षा विभागों के साथ समन्वय सहित औपचारिक पर्यावरण शिक्षा

पर्यावरणीय व्यावसायिक पाठ्यक्रमों में पर्यावरण को मजबूत बनाना

-इग्नूके माध्यम से पर्यावरणीय एप्रिसिएशन पाठ्यक्रम

सेमिनारों/परिसंवादों/कार्यशालाओं के लिए वित्तीय सहायता की मंजूरी

व्यावसायिक सोसायटी/संस्थानों को सहायता अनुदान

पर्यावरण पर प्रकाशनों के लिए वित्तीय सहायता की मंजूरी पुस्तकालय से संबंधित सभी कार्य

पितांबर पंत राष्ट्रीय पर्यावरण फैलोशिप , जैव-विविधता के लिए डॉ. बी.पी. पाल राष्ट्रीय पर्यावरण फैलोशिप , वन्यजीव तथा [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

9817

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1, 1929

(2)

(1)

(3) 63.

दूरभाष सं. 24361668 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 913 डॉ. आर. के. सूरी, अपरनिदेशक (वैज्ञानिक)

64.

श्री अंजनी कुमार, निदेशक ( पशु कल्याण )

दूरभाष सं. 23318553 [email protected] 65.

सुश्री एस . वी. औलक, अपरनिदेशक

दूरभाष सं. 24367685 इंटरकॉम सं. 538 66.

दूरभाष सं. 24361669/752 श्रीमती संचिता जिन्दल, अपरनिदेशक

67.

दूरभाष सं. 24361669/123 डॉ. एच. अहमद, अपरनिदेशक

68.

श्री समीर श्रीवास्तव , उप सचिव ( आई सी- II )

दूरभाष सं. 24362612 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 603 69.

दूरभाष सं. 24366739 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 745 सुश्री प्रतिभा राज, उप सचिव (पीसी और टी एवं ई)

70.

इंटरकॉम सं. 707 श्रीमती एस. घोष राय , उप सचिव

71 .

सुश्री डायस इर्मेलिण्डा मारिया , 'जे, उप सचिव

दूरभाष सं. 24360667 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 610 72.

श्रीके. वी. मैथ्यू, उप सचिव

दूरभाष सं. 24367631 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 527 73.

श्री पी. एस. शर्मा, उप सचिव

दूरभाष सं. 24360659 इंटरकॉम सं. 616 74.

श्री उदय शंकर , उप सचिव (आई एफ डी)

दूरभाष सं. 24362387 drudayshanker@gma il.com इंटरकॉम सं. 914 75.

श्री सी. एल. लांगायन, उप सचिव

दूरभाष सं. 24360769 इंटरकॉम सं. 604 76.

श्री मनोज सेठी, लेखा नियंत्रक

दूरभाष सं. 24361116 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 157 (4)

पशु कल्याण का संरक्षण और प्रबंधन पर विशेषज्ञ प्रकरण समूह एन एन आर एम एस कार्यक्रम

पर्यावरण एवं वन मंत्रालय में पशु कल्याण बोर्ड सहित पशु कल्याण मामले आई.ए. मानीटरी

औद्योगिक क्षेत्र से संबंधित आई.ए. मामले । ई.आई.ए. अधिसूचना नीति । एन.आर.सी.डी. मामले

अंतराष्ट्रीय सहयोग ( आई सी और एस डी- II) योजना समन्वय , व्यापार और पर्यावरण , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय ( मुख्यालय )

पर्यावरण नीति और कानून और सतत विकास तथा अंतर्राष्ट्रीय सहयोग

पारि-विकास बल स्कीम , आई पी वी एम पुरस्कार, एन ई प्रकोष्ठ, ई-शासन , राष्ट्रीय वनीकरण और पारि विकास बोर्ड (एन ए ई बी)

मीडिया और राष्ट्रीय प्राकृतिक विज्ञान का संग्रहालय (एन एम एन एच)

सामान्य समन्वय, सूचना अधिकार का अधिनिय (आर टी आई ) और आंतरिक कार्य अध्ययन एकक

वन, एन.ए.ई.बी. और वन्यजीव से संबंधित आंतरिक वित्त प्रभाग

एन.जी.ओ. प्रकोष्ठ

बजट प्रस्तावों की छानबीन - बजट अनुमानों को तैयार करना - योजनागत बजट के संबंध में योजना समन्वय से विचार- विमर्श करना पूरक अनुदान मांगों में समाविष्ट करने के लिए प्रस्तावों की संवीक्षा 9818

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

(2)

(1)

(3)

77.

इंटरकॉम सं. 925 सुश्री गुर प्यारी ,

अवर सलाहकार ( आर्थिक)

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] (4)

मंत्रालयों की शक्तियों के अंदर और मंत्रालयों की शक्तियों के बाहर , दोनों के संबंध में , प्रस्तावों की पुनर्विनियोजन प्रक्रिया आरंभ करना ।

अनुदान मागें तैयार करना व मुद्रण । प्रारूप/ऑडिट पैरा पर की गई कार्रवाई पर टिप्पण प्रस्तुत करना ।

सरकारी कर्मचारियों को ऋण के अंतर्गत निधियों की संवीक्षा और आबंटन ।

वेतन व अन्य भत्तों का संवितरण ।

सहायता अनुदान का संवितरण ।

आवधिक व्यय विवरण आदि प्राप्त करना । आर्थिक प्रकोष्ठ, सदस्य- सचिव , महिलाओं के विरुद्ध यौन उत्पीड़न प्रकोष्ठ

II . उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 19 ( 1 ) के तहत अपीलीय प्राधिकरण के रूप में नामोर्दिष्ट संयुक्त सचिव/वन महानिरीक्षक/सलाहकार स्तर के अधिकारी ।

पदनाम

क्र. सं.

दूरभाष सं.

(2)

(3) (1)

श्री रघु मेनन,

अपर सचिव एवं वित्तीय सलाहकार

विषय सामग्री

(4)

मंत्रालय के एस एफ सी/ई एफ सी सी सी ई ए प्रस्तावों की जांच करना और उन पर सहमति प्रदान करना ।

दूरभाष फैक्स 24362388

[email protected]

इंटरकॉम सं. 437

दूरभाष सं. 24362551 श्री जी. बालाचन्द्रन , संयुक्त सचिव

[email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 621 3.

श्री जे. एम. माऊसकर , संयुक्तसचिव

विदेशों में प्रतिनियुक्ति ।

सहायता अनुदान जारी करना ।

मंत्रालय के वित्तीय मामले ।

अधिकारियों और कर्मचारियों द्वारा प्राप्त किया गया पारिश्रमिक ।

-अनुदानों मांगें तैयार करना व मुद्रण ।

प्रारूप ऑडिट पैरा पर की गई कार्रवाई , प्रस्तुत करना

राष्ट्रीय जैव - विविधता प्राधिकरण ( एन बी ए ) , मानव और जैव-मंडल कार्यक्रम ( एम ए बी पी ) और अतुलनीय मूल्य विनियामकों की एन्टटीज़ , ई- गर्वनैन्स, जैवीय विविधता कन्वेंशन ( सी बी डी) और राष्ट्रीय जैव- विविधता कार्यनीति और कार्य योजना ( एन बी एस ए पी ) , पशु कल्याण बोर्ड सहित पशु कल्याण ।

जेनेटिक इंजीनियरिंग अनुमोदन समिति (जीईएसी)

दूरभाष सं. 24364687

[email protected]

इंटरकॉम सं. 418

श्री आर. के. वैश , संयुक्त सचिव

जलवायु परिवर्तन ( सीसी ) ( सी डी एम और यूएन एफ सी सी सी सहित ) , वैश्विक उष्णता और क्योटो प्रोटोकॉल

दूरभाष सं. 24360634

[email protected]

इंटरकॉम सं. 415

प्रदूषण नियंत्रण ( सी पी ) , संकटमय पदार्थ प्रबंध प्रभाग ( एच एस एम डी ) , केन्द्रीय प्रदूषण नियंत्रण बोर्ड का प्रशासन [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

9819

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22, 2007/पौष 1, 1929

(1)

(2)

(3) 5.

श्री सुधीर मित्तल , संयुक्त सचिव

दूरभाष सं. 24363956 , 23314932 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 414 6.

डॉ. बी.पी. नीलरत्न , संयुक्तसचिव

दूरभाष सं. 24361712 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 408 7.

श्री ए.के. गोयल , संयुक्तसचिव

दूरभाष सं. 24361774 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 440 8.

श्री एम. सेनगुप्ता , सलाहकार

दूरभाष सं. 9871738714, 24369629 msen 2k@lycos . com manotosh_ [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 548 9.

डॉ सुबोध कुमार शर्मा , सलाहकार

(4)

अंतर्राष्ट्रीय सहयोग ( आई सी एंड एस डी II ) (पर्यावरण स्थिति रिपोटों को छोड़कर) , ग्लोबल पर्यावरण सुविधा ( जी ई एफ ) , सतर्कता, राष्ट्रीय प्राकृतिक विज्ञान संग्रहालय ( एन एम एन एच ) , पर्यावरण नीति और कानून, विधायी प्रकोष्ठ सहित, सतत विकास और अंतर्राष्ट्रीय सहयोग , मरुस्थलीकरण रोकने के लिए यूनाईटेड नेशन कन्वेंशन (यू एन सी सी डी) , मीडिया, आई यू सीएन- विश्व संरक्षण यूनियन

प्रवाल भित्तयां, कच्छ वनहपति , फाउंडेशन ऑफ रिवाईटेलाईजेशन ऑफ लोकल हेल्थ ट्रेडिशन ( एफ आर एल एच टी ) , ओजोन सेल और मॉन्ट्रीयल प्रोटोकॉल , सी ई एस/ आई आई एस सी, बंगलौर , हिन्दी ( राजभाषा )

- भारतीय वन सेवा का प्रशासन, वानिकी स्थापना, उष्णकटिबंधीय वनस्पति उद्यान एवं अनुसंधान संस्थान ( टी बी जी आर आई ) और वर्गिकी में क्षमता निर्माण पर अखिल भारतीय समनिवत परियोजना ( ए आई सी ओ पी टी ए एक्स)

सामान्य प्रशासन और संसद/प्रोटोकॉल प्रशासन और जन शिकायत निवारण प्रकोष्ठ , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों की स्थापना, सामान्य समन्वय , सूचना का अधिकार और आंतरिक कार्य अध्ययन एकक, भारतीय वनस्पति सर्वेक्षण ( बी एस आई ) , बोटनिकल गार्डन ऑफ इंडियन रिपब्लिक (बी जी आई आर ) , भारतीय प्राणि सर्वेक्षण ( जेड एस आई ) , वनस्पति उद्यानों को सहायता प्रदान करना , जी. बी. पन्त हिमालय पर्यावरण विकास संस्थान ( जी बी पी एच आई ई डी ) , सलीम अली पक्षी विज्ञान और प्राकृतिक विज्ञान केन्द्र (एस ए सी.ओ एन ) , जैव- सुरक्षा पर क्षमता निर्माण परियोजना , जैव सुरक्षा प्रोटोकॉल -नमभूमियां और रामसर कनवेंशन -अंतराष्ट्रीय समेकित पर्वतीय विकास केन्द्र (आई सी आई एम ओ डी)

राष्ट्रीय नदी संरक्षण निदेशालय ( एनआरसीडी) , राष्ट्रीय झील संरक्षण योजना ( एन एल सी पी ) -स्वच्छ उत्पादन/स्वच्छ प्रौद्योगिकी

दूरभाष सं. 24360861

[email protected]

इंटरकॉम सं. 112

नेशनल कॉम्यूनीकेशन्स ( एन ए टी सी ओ एम ) आई पी सी सी (जलवायु परिवर्तन पर अंतर-सरकारी पैनल ) , और जलवायु परिवर्तन से संबंधित सभी अन्य वैज्ञानिक/तकनीकी कार्य 9820

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

(1)

(2)

(3)

10.

सलाहकार श्री आर. आन्नदकुमार, दूरभाष सं. 24364592 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 534 11 .

डॉजी. के. पांडे, सलाहकार

दूरभाष सं. 24360467 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 531 12.

श्री आर. मेहता, सलाहकार

दूरभाष सं. 24362840 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 543 13.

श्री आर. एस. अहलावत , आर्थिक सलाहकार

दूरभाष सं. 24362663 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 908 14.

डॉ. एस. पी . शर्मा , सांख्यिकीय सलाहकार

दूरभाष सं. 24363021 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 103 15.

डॉ. नलिनी भट्ट, सलाहकार ( वैज्ञानिक)

दूरभाष सं. 24360478 nalini [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 541 16.

डॉ. इन्द्राणी चन्द्रशेखरन , सलाहकार ( वैज्ञानिक)

दूरभाष सं. 24360662 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 741 17.

डॉ. आर. बी. लाल वन महानिरीक्षक

दूरभाष सं. 24360740 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 106

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] (4)

फ्लाई एश, प्रभाव मूल्यांकन ( आई ए ) , तटीय विनियमन जोन ( सी आर जेड )

पर्यावरणीय स्वास्थ्य, विश्व बैंक औद्योगिक विकास क्षमता निर्माण परियोजना ।

पर्यावरणीय शिक्षा ( पुस्तकालय ) , पर्यावरण , ग्लोबल पब्लिक गुड्स में अनुसंधान

-योजना समन्वय, आर्थिक प्रकोष्ठ , व्यापार और पर्यावरण - बजट प्रस्ताव और बजट अनुमान -बजट प्रस्तावों की संवीक्षा और पूरक अनुदान हेतु बजट प्रस्ताव सहित बजट अनुमानों को तैयार करना।

-मंत्रालय की शक्तियों के अंदर और मंत्रालय की शक्तियों के बाहर दोनो में प्रस्तावों के पुनर्विनियोजन की प्रक्रिया संबंधी कार्य।

वार्षिक रिपोर्ट , ' पर्यावरण स्थिति' रिपोर्ट, पर्यावरणीय सूचना ( इन्दिरा गांधी पर्यावरण पुरस्कार कोछोड़कर) , सांख्यिकीय प्रकोष्ठ, एन जी ओ प्रकोष्ठ

-प्रदूषण नियंत्रण ( सीपी ) सी ई पी एस , पर्यावरण प्रयोगशाला , सी आर ई पी , मानक तैयार करना और ध्वनि प्रदूषण

-खतरनाक पदार्थ प्रबंध प्रभाग ( एच एस एम डी ) -खतरनाक रसायनों के विनिर्माण भण्डारण और आयात सहित रासायनिक सुरक्षा -लोक देयता बीमा अधिनियम -पी ओ पीज पर स्टाक होम कन्वेंशन -नगरीयठोस अपशिष्टों सहित ठोस अपशिष्ट प्रबंध

-पुनःचक्रित प्लास्टिक ( विनिर्माण और उपयोग ) नियमावली -

अन्तरराष्ट्रीय रासायनिक प्रबंध के प्रति रणनीतिक दृष्टिकोण ( एस ए आई सी एम ) वन्यजीव , वन्यजीव क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , साईटेस , राष्ट्रीय उद्यान और अभयारण्य , डब्ल्यूएच सी, राष्ट्रीय प्राणि उद्यान , केन्द्रीय चिड़ियाघर प्राधि- करण , एन बी डब्ल्यू एल एफ , सी एम एस, यूरेस्को, वन्यजीव [भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

(1)

(2)

(3) 18.

श्रीके. बी. थम्पी, वन महानिरीक्षक

दूरभाषसं. 24367404 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 710 19.

9821

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

(4)

रा.व. पारि विकास बोर्ड, एफ डी ए/एन ए पी (28 राज्य) वनीकरण से संबंधित नीतिगत मामले , ग्रीनिंग इंडिया स्कीम हेतु सहायता अनुदान, पारि- विकास स्कीमें , और अन्य रा.व. पारि - विकास स्कीमें एम एण्ड ई और इन्दिरा प्रियदर्शिनी वृक्षमित्र पुरस्कार

दूरभाष सं. 24362698

[email protected]

इंटरकॉम सं. 115

श्री अंसार अहमद, वन महानिरीक्षक (एफ सी)

20.

वन संरक्षण ( एफ सी ) , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय ( आर. ओ. ) वाणिकी अनुसंधान व प्रशिक्षण और वन नीति, बाह्य सहायता प्राप्त परियोजना प्रकोष्ठ और पूर्वोतर राज्य प्रकोष्ठ, वन संरक्षण

दूरभाष सं. 24362698

[email protected]

इंटरकॉम सं. 115

श्री अंसार अहमद , वन महानिरिक्षक (ई एपी)

21.

श्री ए.एन.न. प्रसाद, वन महानिरीक्षक व निदेशक (पी ई)

दूरभाष सं. 24360957 [email protected] इंटरकॉम सं. 113 22.

दूरभाष सं. 23384428 [email protected] श्री राजेश गोपाल , वन महानिरिक्षक और निदेशक (पीटी)

23.

श्री बी. आर. शर्मा, सदस्य सचिव , सी.जेड.ए.

दूरभाष सं. 23381585 [email protected] 24.

श्री ए. के. त्रिवेदी, मुख्य अभियंता ( सी सी यू)

दूरभाष सं. 24360643 फैक्स 24363422 [email protected], इंटरकॉम सं. 728 बाह्य सहायता प्राप्त परियोजना ( ई ए पी ) , सर्वेक्षण और उपयोगिता (एस यू) और वन सुरक्षा प्रभाग (एफ पी डी)

हाथी परियोजना , भारतीय वन्यजीव संस्थान और वन्यजीव अपराध प्रकोष्ठ

राष्ट्रीय बाघ संरक्षण प्राधिकरण ( एन टी सी ए) से संबंधित सभी मामले

केन्द्रीय चिड़ियाघर प्राधिकरण , राष्ट्रीय प्राणि उद्यान सर्वेक्षण और उपयोगिता , वन सुरक्षा प्रभाग और जे एफ एम प्रकोष्ठ , वन नीति, एन एफ ए पी, एफ आई सी , वन अनुसंधान और प्रशिक्षण और एन एफसी

योजना और निर्माण संबंधी कार्य जैसे ऑफिस की इमारतें , प्रयोगशाला की इमारतें , आवासीय परिसर हरबेरियम संग्रहालय , मंत्रालय के अधीनस्थ कार्यालयों की लैंड सकेपिंग

III. ऐसे सभी अधिकारी जिनके पास जानकारी है और जो मामलों का निपटान कर रहे हों, वे वस्तुतः जन सूचना अधिकारी होंगे । IV. मंत्रालय के लिंक अधिकारियों को मामोदिष्ट किये जाने की व्यवस्था, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के तहत मामलों का निपटान कर रहे अपीलीय प्राधिकरणों/केन्द्रीय जन सूचना कार्यालयों को भी लागू होंगी।

V. यह अधिसूचना मंत्रालय की दिनांक 5 सितम्बर, 2007 की पूर्व अधिसूचना संख्या 34011/20/2006- आई.डब्ल्यू.एस.यू. का अधिक्रांत करती है।

[फा. सं. 1/2/2007 - आर. सी. ]

ए. के. गोयल , संयुक्त सचिव

MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS

NewDelhi , the 12th December , 2007

S.O. 3556- in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 5(1 )/Section 19( 1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, the following officers of the Ministry of Environment and Forests are hereby designated as Central Public Information Officers Appellate Authorities etc, in respect of the specific subject matters mentioned against their names .

1.Officers ofthe level of DIGF/Director/Additional Director/Deputy Secretary /AIGF designated as Central Public Information Officers under Section 5 (1) of the Act.

9822

[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

Tele.No.

Subject matter

S.No. Designation

Forest Protection Division & Joint Forest Manage- Smt. Rekha Pai , DIGF

ment (JFM) Cell, LULUCF under United Nation Frame T. No. 24362875 [email protected] Intercom No. 515

2. Shri J. V. Sharma , DIGF

work Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Forest Policy, NFAP, Forest International Cooperation (FIC) & National Forest Commission (NFC)

T. No. 24360549 [email protected] Intercom No. 520

Survey&Utilization , ITTO

Shri BipinBehari , DIGF

T. No. 24360704 [email protected] Intercom No. 503

4 Shri A. K. Johari , DIGF(RT)

T. No. 24364624 [email protected] Intercom No. 513

Forestry Research and Training, Asia-Pacific Forest Invasion Network (APFISN) , International Network for Bamboo and Rattan (INBAR ), Administrative and Financial matters of Indian Council Forestry Research and Education ( ICFRE) , Dehradun, Forest Survey of India (FSI ) Dehradun Indira Gandhi National Forest Academy ( IGNFA) , Dehradun, Directorate of Forest Education (DFE) , Dehradun and all matters of Indian Plywood Industries Research and Training Institute (IPIRTI ), Bangalore and indian Institute of Forest Management ( IIFM) , Bhopal .

5. Shri C.D. Singh , AIGF

Forest Conservation { Forest (Conservation ) Act, 1980}

T. No. 24363984 [email protected] Intercom No. 523

Work related to EAP/NE Cell , in addition to existing work ofFPD

Shri Umakant, AIGF

T. No. 24363974 [email protected] Intercom No. 517

7. Shri A.K. Joshi , AIGF

Forest Conservation {Forest(Conservation) Act , 1980}

T. No. 24363970 [email protected]@ hotmail.com Intercom No. 512

& Shri Sanjay Kumar , DIGF

T. No. 24362416 [email protected] Intercom No. 705

NAEB , FDA/ NAP ( 12 States) , Policy matters related to afforestation, 20 Point Programme , M &E , Communi- cation & united nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD)

9. Shri D. Jana, AIGF

T. No. 24362497 debasisjana2002@ rediffmail.com Intercom No. 706

FDA/NAP (10 States) , Grants - in-aid for Greening India scheme, Development of Forest Villages Schemes , Gram Van Yojana Scheme and National Afforestation and Eco -Development Board (NAEB )

10. Shri D. Jana, AIGF

NAEB , FDAS /NAP (6 states ) , Policy matters related to NAP, tree planting on farm lands and CEMDE T. No. 24362497 debasisjana2002@ rediffmail.com Intercom No. 706

11. Shri Anmol Kumar, DIGF

T. No. 24362813 [email protected] Intercom No. 519

Wildlife, Wildlife Regional Offices , World Heritage Convention, National Zoological park, Central Zoo Authority, National Board of Wildlife , matter relating to International Conservation union , Convention on Migratory Species , UNESCO.

9823

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22, 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

(1)

(2)

(3) 12. Dr. R. Hasan , Director(Scientific)

T. No. 24360734 [email protected] IntercomNo. 740 13.

T. No. 24361795 [email protected] Intercom No. 717 ShriPramod Krishnan, Jt. Director (WL)

14. Shri Ganga Singh , Jt. Director

T. No. 23:389883 [email protected] 15.

T. No. 24360772 Rao Muralidhar Chakilam Director

agmu [email protected] Intercom No.435 16. Shri Satish Agarwal , Director

[email protected] [email protected] Intercom No. 505 17. Shri Surendra Kumar , Director

T. No. 24361613 [email protected] Intercom No. 116 18. Shri Vijay Kumar , Director(Vig)

T. No. 24366841 [email protected] Intercom No. 535 19. Shri J.L. Chugh, Director

T. No. 24364303 [email protected] Intercom No. 918 20. Shri Sanjeev Swaroop, Director

T. No. 24368442 [email protected] Intercom No. 140

T. No. 24365020 21. Shri B. Sikka, Director (Scientific) b [email protected] Intercom No. 122 22. Shri Yogesh Sharma , Director (Scientific)

T. No. 24366008 [email protected] Intercom No. 141 23. Dr. (Mrs.) R. Dalwani Director (Scientific)

T. No. 24364789 [email protected] Intercom No. 142

T. No. 24368526 [email protected] Intercom No. 143 24. Shri . Lalit Kapur, Addl . Director (Scientific)

4935 G1/07-4

(4)

Wildlife Management matters

Wildlife, Convention on International Trade on Endangered Species (CITES) , Project Elephant , National Parks & Sanctuaries

Allmatters relating to National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA)

Indian Forest Service

Cadre Management except AGMUT Cadre

Administration & Public Grievance Redressal Cell , Establishment of Regional Offices -Creation and continuation of posts .

General Administration & Parliament FC Cases/ Finance ofRegional Offices and CP Division

Vigilancematters

Forest Establishment

National River Conservation Directorate (NRCD) Administration Co - ordination of IC & Training Budget,

Annual Plan , Co- ordination of Parliamentary matters/ committees, Committees of NRCA , Coordination work ofNRCP/GAP including parliament Questions, matters of general nature requiring co- ordination , Co- ordination of YAP, Works of oublicity , public partici- pation and Media .

(i ) NRCP Works of U.P. , Punjab , H.P. , Haryana Rajasthan

(ii) Complete coordination of A Study (iii) NLCP works of J & K

NRCP Works of Kerala , Goa & Uttarkhand and NLCP Works of Uttarkhand .

(a) NLCP Coordination and works of NLCP for all State other than J & K Uttarkhand & West Bengal . (b) R& D Projects.

(c) Water Quality Mnitoring of Rivers under NRCP including sediments and Analytical Quality Control. (d) Performance Monitoring of STPS

NRCP works of Tamil Nadu , Delhi & West Bengal, and NLCP works of West Bengal .

9824

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/ PAUSA 1 , 1929

(1) (2)

(3)

(4)

NRCP works ofGujarat Maharashtra , Bihar , Jharkhand and Andhra Pradesh .

T. No. 24363869 [email protected] Intercom No. 133

25. Shri . Rajiv Sinha , Addl . Director (Scientific)

NRCP works of Orissa , North- East State, M.R. , Chattishgarh and Karnataka

T. No. 24363007 [email protected] Intercom No. 118

26. Shri . B.B. Barman , Addl . Director (Scientific)

Ramsar Convention & National Wetlands Conserva- tionProgramme, SACON as Centre ofExcellence 27. Dr. S. Kaul , Director (Scientific)

T. No. 24360492 26178917(R) [email protected] Intercom No. 602

28. Shri . Vivek Saxena , Director

T. No. 24367077 [email protected] Intercom No. 431

-G.B. Pant Himalayan Institute of Environment Development ( GBPHIED) & International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development ( ICIMOD ) Cadre Management of AGMUT Cadre of India Forest Service (IFS) and ACR Cell of IFS Officers

29. Shri . R.K. Sethi , Director

Climate Change (CC) ( including CDM & UNFCCC ) , GlobalWarming & Kyoto Protocol

T. No. 24362252 [email protected] Intercom No. 135

Control of Pollution (CP) - Environmental Authorities - Eco - cities

T. No. 24367640 [email protected] Intercom No. 739

30. Dr. Jag Ram , Director (Scientific)

- Pollution Awards

T. No. 24363962 [email protected] Intercom No. 546

31. Dr. J.R. Bhatt, Director (Scientific)

Coral Reefs & Mangroves except CRZ , AICOPТАХ (All Coordinated Project on Capacity Building in Tax- onomy , CES on Medicinal Plan foundation of Revitali- zation of Local Health Tradition ( FRLHT) and Janaki Amal National Award for Taxonomy

Ozone Cell & Montreal Protocol

T. No. 24642176 [email protected]

32. Dr. A. Duraiswamy, Director (Scientific)

Genetic Engineering Approval Committee ( GEAC ) & Bio- safety Protocol

T. No. 24363964 [email protected] Intercom No. 530

33. Dr. ( Mrs) Ranjini Warrier , Director (Scientific)

Hindi (Official language)

34. Shri . Jai Narayan , Director

T. No. 24361952 (0) Intercom No. 625

T. No. 24364594

gvs [email protected] Intercom No. 601

35. Dr. G.V. Subrahmaniam , Director (Scientific)

Allgeneral issues and issues relating to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification and Industrial Projects except Oil, Gas and Petroleum and Distilleries sector .

T. No. 24362434 [email protected] Intercom No. 545

36. Dr. S.K. Agarwal , Director (Scientific)

Impact Assessment ( IA) -Thermal Power Projects , -Mining Projects &

-Nuclear Power Projects Impact Assessment ( IA)

T. No. 24363973 [email protected] Intercorn No. 174

37. Dr. P.L. Ahujarai , Director (Scientific)

-Non-Coal Mining Projects in AP , Karnataka , Kerala , Tamil Nadu , Goa , Chandigarh and Maharashtra and Industrial Projects of Oil , Gas and Petroleum and Distilleries sector .

Impact Assessment ( IA)

Tel . No. 24360795 [email protected] Intercom No.516

38. Shri Bharat Bhushan , Director (Scientific)

Construction Projects in all states except Maharashtra and Haryana [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(2)

(1)

T. No. 24363963 [email protected] Intercom No. 172 39. Dr. T. Chandni , Director (Scientific)

40. Shri R.C. Meena , Director (EE)

T. No. 24360783 [email protected] Intercom No. 906

T. No. 24363677 [email protected] Intercom No. 927 41. Dr. Naseem Ahmed, Director (Scientific)

T. No. 24367625 [email protected] Intercom No. 552 42. Shri Ashok Bhatia , Director (Scientific)

[email protected] 43. Dr. (Mrs) Chanda Chaudhary Director (Scientific)

T. No. 24361410 [email protected] Intercom No. 7238 44. Dr. M. Subba Rao , Director (Scientific)

T. No. 24360270 [email protected] Intercom No. 117 45. Dr. (Mrs) Manju Raina, Addl. Director (Scientific)

T. No. 24366347 [email protected] Intercom No. 556 46. Shri R.N. Jindal , Addl . Director (Scientific)

47. Dr. S. Bhowmik , Addl. Director (Scientific)

Tel No. 24362827 bhowmik @menf delhi.nic.in IntercomNo. 539

T. No. 24360789 [email protected] Intercom No. 144 48. Dr. K.C. Rathore , Addl. Director (Scientific)

49. Shri S. Jagannathan , Director

T. No. 24360678 [email protected] Intercom No. 522

T. No. 24360588 seccumef@@nic.in Intercom No. 725 50. Shri A. Aundeeswaran , Supdt.Engineer (CCU)

51. Dr. E.V. Muley, Addl . Director

T. No. 24364593 [email protected]

9825

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

(4)

Impact Assessment ( IA) - CoalMining Projects

-National Green Corps/Eco - clubs Participation of Ministry and its allied officers in Exhibitions /Fairs .

Grant of financial assistance for other awareness Programmes .

Grant of financial assistance for organization of training programmes .

Eco-system Research Programme & Eastern and Western GhatResearch Programme , Thematic Expert group (A &B) on conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Natural Resource .

Environment Research Programme ( ERP) , Research Proposals related to economic and social environmental issues , Thematic Expert Group on Prevention, Abate- mentand Control of Pollution & Thematic Expert Group on Economic and Social Issues .

Chemical Safety in Maximum Accident Hazard ( MAH ) Unit

Biomedical Waste Management (Management & Hand- ling) Rules , Hazardous Waste ( Management & Hand- ling) Rules , Batteries ( Management & Handling Rules , BaselConvention on control of trans -boundary move- ment of hazardous waste & Standing Committee on Hazarodous Waste

Control Pollution ( CP) Water Quality , recognition of laboratories and Indus- trialPollution

Control ofPollution (CP) - Air Pollution, vehicular & noise pollution

Impact Assessment ( IA) RiverValley Sector (Irrigation & Hydro Electric Project) Ecologically Senstive area notifications

Impact Assessment (IA) Construction Projects in Maharashtra and Haryana Integrated Finance Division on Environment & NRCD Planning and construction works like office buildings , 'Laboratory buildings , residential quarters , Herbarium , Museums, Landscaping of subordinate offices of the Ministry.

Botanical Survey of India ( BSI ) , Zoological Survey of India ( ZSI ) , Botanic Garden of Indian Republic (BGIR) 9826

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

(4)

(2)

(3)

(1)

Intercom No. 558

(Scientific)

National Bio -diversity Authority (NBA) , Man and Bio- sphere Programme ( MABP) & Entities of In- comparable Value Regulations

52. Dr. R.K. Rai , Addl . Director (Scientific)

T. No. 24367669 (0) 2625098 (R) [email protected] Intercom No. 612

UNDP_CCF II Orihects ib ( a ) Medicinal Plants and (b) Biodiversity Conservation through Community Participation CES /IISC, Bangalore , Assistance to Botanic Gardens

Convention on Biological Diversity ( CBD ) & National Bio-diversity Strategy & Action Plan (NBSAP) T. No. 24361601 [email protected] Intercom No. 737

53. Dr. Sujata Arora , Addl . Director (Scientific)

Impact Assessment ( Industry)

T. No. 24367668 [email protected] Intercom No. 550

54. Dr. P.B. Rastogi , Addl . Director (Scientific)

Capacity Building Project on Bio- safety & Environ- mental Health

T. No. 24367663 [email protected] Intercom No. 914

55. Dr. M. Hota, Addl . Director (Scientific)

CleanProduction/ Clean Technology

T. No. 24364595 [email protected] Intercom No. 743

56. Dr. M. Salahuddin, Addl . Director (Scientific)

Coastal Regulation Zones (CRZ) and Infrastructure Projects

T. No. 24360694 [email protected] Intercom No. 744

57. Dr. Senthil Vel , Addl . Director (Scientific)

Legal Cell

T. No. 24362755 Intercom No. 614

58. Shri Ishwar Singh , Sr.LegalOfficer

WorldBank Industrial Development Capacity Project - Rotterdam Convention

T. No. 24364067 [email protected] Intercom No. 751

59. Dr. Saroj , Addl . Director (Scientific)

T. No. 24360379 sujata [email protected] Intercom No. 557

60 Mrs. Sujata Khaparde , Addl . Director (Scientific)

- Centre for Environment Education , Ahmedabad - CPR Environmental Education Centre , Cheenai - Setting Up new Centres of Excellence

-National Environment Awareness Campaign (NEAC) -Global Leraning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE) Programme

- Formal Environment Education including Coordina- tion with MHRD, NCERT and State Education Department

Strengthening of Environment in Professional courses -Environmental Appreciation courses through IGNOU .

Grant of financial assistance for Seminars / Symposia/ Workshops

T. No. 24367664 rita khanna [email protected] Intercom No. 176/173

61. Mrs. Rita Khanna , Addl . Director (Scientific)

Grants - in - aid to Professional Societies / Institutions Grants of financial assistance for publications on Environment

-allwork related to Library

Pitamber Pant National Environment Fellowship , T. No. 24367670 Intercoin No. 609

62. Dr. A.K. Tyagi , Addl . Director (Scientific)

Dr. B.P. Pal National Environment Fellowship for Bio -diversity, Thematic Expert Group on Conservation and Management of Wildlife and Animal Welfare NNRMS Programme

T. No. 24361668 rk [email protected] Intercoin No. 913

63. Dr. R.K. Suri , Addl . Director (Scientific) [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(2)

(3)

(1)

64. Shri Anjani Kumar, DS (AW)

Tele No. 23318553 [email protected]

Tele No. 24367685 Intercom No. 538 65. Ms. S.V. Auluck , Addl . Director

Tele No. 24361669/752 66. Mrs. Sanchita Jindal , Addl . Director

Tele No. 24361669/123 67. Dr. H. Ahmed, Addl . Director

68. Shri Sameer Srivastava, DS( IC- II)

Tele No. 24362612 [email protected] Intercom No. 603

Tele No. 24366739 [email protected] Intercom No. 745 69. Ms. Pratibha Raj , Dy. Secretary (PC and T& E)

TeleNo.

70. Smt . S. Ghosh Roy , Dy. Secretary

Tele No. 24360667

Maria. [email protected] Intercom No. 610 71. Ms. Dias Ermelind Maria J , Dy. Secretary

72. Shri K.V. Mathew, Dy. Secretary

Tele No. 24367631 [email protected] Intercom No. 527

Tele No. 24360659 Intercom No. 616 73. Shri P.S. Sharma, Dy. Secretary(GC)

74. Shri Uday Shankar , Dy. Secretary, ( IFD)

TeleNo. 24362387 [email protected] . com.

Intercom No. 914

Tele No. 24360769 Intercom No. 604 75. Shri C.L. Langain, Dy.Secretary

Tele No. 24361116

sirsaborn @ yahoo. Intercom No. 157 76. Shri Manoj Sethi , Controller of Accounts

Tele No. 24368843 Intercom No. 925.

77. Ms. Gur Pyari , Addl .Adviser (Eco)

9827

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

Animal Welfare including Animal Welfare Board matters in the MoEF

IA Monitoring

IA- matter related to industry sector . EIA notification -policy NRCD-matter

International Cooperation ( IC& SD II)

PlanCoordination , Trade and Environment, Regional Offices(HQs)

-Environment Policy and Law & Sustainable Development & International cooperation

Eco-Development Forces Schemes , IPVM Awards , NE Cell , E -governance, National Afforestation and ECO Development Board (NAEB )

Media & National Museum of Natural History (NMNM) -Media

General Coordination , Right to Information Act ( RTI ) & Internal Work Study Unit

Integrated Finance Division on Forests , NAEB & Wildlife

NGOCell

Scrutiny of budget proposals - Preparation of budget estimates

Interaction with Plan Coordination regarding Plan Budget.

- Scrutiny of proposals for inclusion in Supplementary Demands for grants .

- Processing of Re - appropriation proposals both within the Powers of Ministry and beyond the Powers of Ministry.

-Preparation and Printing of Demands for Grants .

Submission of Action Taken Notes on Draft/Audit paras .

Scrutiny and allocation of funds under loans to Government Servants .

- Disbursal of salaries and other allowances

- Disbursal ofGrants - in- aid

- Taking out periodical expenditure statement etc. Economic Cell , Member - Secretary , Cell on Sexual Harassment against Women 9828

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] II . Officers of the level of Joint Secretary/ IGF/ Adviser designated as Appellate Authorities under Section 19 ( 1 ) of the above Act .

Sl . No.

Tele. No.

Designation

Subject Matter

Tele Fax 24362388

-Examination and Concurrence of SFC /EFC / CCEA pro- posals of the Ministry .

1. Shri Raghu Menon , Additional Secretary & FA

[email protected] Intercom No. 437

Deputation abroad.

- Release ofGrants - in- aid

- Financial matters of the Ministry

Remuneration received by Officers and employees .

-Preparation and Printing of Demands for Grants .

Submission of Action Taken Notes on Draft/Audit pars

2. Shri G. Balachandhran , JointSecretary

Tele No. 24362551 [email protected] Intercom No. 621

National Bio -diversity Authority (NBA), Man and Bio- sphere Programme ( MABP ) & Entities of Incompa- rable Value Regulations ,

E-Governance , Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) & National Bio -diversity Strategy & Action Plan (NBSAP) , Animal Welfare including Animal Wel- fare Board , Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC)

3. Shri J.M. Mauskar , JointSecretary

Climate Change (CC) ( including CDM & UNFCCC) , GlobalWarming & Kyoto Protocol

Tele No. 24364687 jm. [email protected] Intercom No. 418

4. Shri R.K. Vaish , Joint Secretary

Control of Pollution ( CP) , Hazardous Substances , Management Division ( HSMD ), CPCB Administration Tele No. 24360634 [email protected] Intercom No. 415

5. Shri Sudhir Mital , JointSecretary

Tele No. 24363956, 23314932 mital sudhir@ nic . in Intercom No. 414

International Cooperation ( IC & SD II ) ( excluding ' State of Environment ' reports ) , Global Environment Facility (GEF) , Vigilance , National Museum of Natural History (NMNH) , Environment Policy and Law , inc. Legal Cell , Sustainable development & International Cooperation , United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Media, IUCN - The world Conservation Union .

6. Dr. B.P. Nilaratna, JointSecretary

Tele No. 24361712 [email protected] Intercom No. 408

Coral Reefs , Mangroves , Foundation of Revitalization ofLocalHealth Tradition ( FRLHT), Ozone Cell & Mont- real Protocol , CES /II Sc , Bangalore , Hindi (Official Language)

- Administration of India Forests Service , Forest Estab- lishment , Tropical Botanical garden and Research In- stitute ( TBGRI) & All India Coordinate project on Capacity Building In Taxonomy ( AICOPTAX)

General Administration & Parliament /Protocol , 7. Shri A.K. Goyal , JointSecretary

Tele No. 24361774 akg@nic. in Intercom No. 440

Administration & Public Grievance Redressal Cell , Establishment Regional Offices , General Coordination , RTI & Internal Work Study Unit, Botanical Survey of India (BSI ) , Botanical Garden of Indian Republic (BGIR) , Zoological Survey of India (ZSI ) , Assistance to Bota- nicalGardens , G.B. Pant Himalayan Institute of Environ- ment Development ( GBPHIED ) Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology & Natural History ( SACON ) , Capacity Building Project on Bio - safety , Bio- safety Protocol - Wetlands and Ramsar Convention [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

8. Shri M. Sengupta , Adviser

T. No. 9871738714/24369629 [email protected] manotosh sengupta@yahoo . com Intercom No. 548 9. Dr. Subodh Kumar Sharma, Adviser

T. No. 2436 0861 subodh.kurnar@nic . Intercom No. 112 10. Shri R. Anandakumar , Adviser

T. No. 24364592 [email protected] Intercom No. 534 11. Dr. G.K. Pandey, Adviser

T.No. 24360467 [email protected] IntercomNo. 531 12. Shri R. Mehta, Adviser

T. No. 24362840 [email protected] Intercom No. 543 13. Shri R.S. Ahlawat, Economic Adviser

T. No. 24362663 [email protected] Intercom No. 908 14. Dr. S.P. Sharma, Statistical Adviser

T. No. 24363021 [email protected] Intercom No. 103

T. No: 24360478 [email protected] Intercom No. 541 15. Dr. Nalini Bhatt, Adviser (Scientific)

T. No. 24360662 [email protected] Intercom No. 741 16. Dr. Indrani Chandrasekharan , Adviser (Scientific)

17. Dr. R.B. Lal IGF

T. No. 24360740 [email protected] Intercom No. 106 18. Shri K.B. Thampi IGF

T.No. 24367404 [email protected] Intercom No. 710

9829

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

International Centre for Integrated Mountain Deve- lopment ( ICIMOD)

National River Conservation Directorate (NRCD), National Lake Conservation Plan (NLCP)

-Clean Production/Cleans Technology

National Communications (NATCOM)

- IPCC ( Inter - Governmental Pane on Climate Change) & all other Scientific/Technical Works related to Climate Change.

Fly ash, Impact Assessment ( IA) , Coastal Regulation Zones(CRZ)

Environmental Health , World Bank Industrial , Deve- lopment Capacity Project

Environmental Education ( Library) , Research in Environment, Global Public Goods

Plan Coordination, Economic Cell, Trade & Environ- ment

Budget proposals & Budget Estimates

Scrutiny of budget proposals & Preparation of budget estimates , including budget proposals for supplementary grants .

Processing of Re - appropriation proposals both with in the Powers of Ministry and beyond the Powers ofMinistry.

Annual Report, ' State of Environment ' Reports , Enviran- mental Information (excluding Indira Gandhi Paryavaran Puraskar) , Statistical Cell , NGO Cell

-Control ofPollution (CP) CEPS , Environment Laboratory, CREP, Formulation of standards & noise pollution Hazardous Substances Management Division (HSMD) Chemical Safety including Manufacture , Storage and Import ofHazardous Chemicals

-Public Liability Insurance Act

Stockholm Convention on POPS

SolidWastes Management including Municipal Solid Wastes

- Recycled Plastics (Manufacture and Useage ) Rules - Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM)

Wildlife , WL ROS , CITES, National Parks & Sanctuaries , WHC, NZP , CZA, NBWLF , CMS, UNESCO , Wildlife NAEB FDAS/NAP (28 states ), Policy matters relatedto afforestation, grants - in -aid for Greening India Scheme , Eco-developments schemes and other NAEB schemes, M&E and IPVM Awards .

9830

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

19. Shri Ansar Ahmed , IGF (FC)

T. No. 24362698 [email protected] Intercom No. 115 20. Shri Ansar Ahmed , IGF (EAP)

T. No. 24362698 [email protected] Intercom No. 115 .

T. No. 24360957 [email protected] Intercom No. 113 21. Shri A.N. Prasad , IGF & Director (PE)

T. No. 23384428 [email protected]

22. Shri Rajesh Gopal , IGF& Director (PT)

T. No. 23382585 [email protected]

23. Shri B.R. Sharma , Member Secretary, CZA

24. Shri A.K. Trivedi , ChiefEngineer (CCU)

T. No. 24360643 Fax 24363422 Email [email protected] Intercom No. 728

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 4

Forest Conservation ( FC) , Regional Officers (ROS ) , Forestry Research and Training & Forest Policy. EAP Cell & NE Cell , Forest Convervation

Externally Aided Projects (EQP ) , Survey and Utilization (SU) & Forest Protection Division ( FPP)

Project Elephat , Wildlife Institute of India and Wildlife CrimeCell

All matters relating to National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA)

Central Zoo Authority , National Zoological Park , Survey & Utilization , Forest Protection Division & JFM Cell , Forest Policy , NFAP, FIC , Forests Research & Training & NFC

Planning and construction works like office buildings , Laboratory buildings , residential quarters , Herbarium Museums , Landscaping of subordinate offices of the Ministry.

III. All Officers in possession of information and dealing with the matters above will be de - facto PIOs .

IV. The arrangement of designating Link Officers in the Ministry will also be applicable to the Appellate Authorities/ CPIOs for dealing with matters under the RTI Act. V. This supersedes the earlier notification No. 34011 /20/2006 - IWSU dated 5th September, 2007 of this Ministry .

उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय (उपभोक्तामामले विभाग )

[F. No. 1 /2 /2007 - RC ] A.K. GOYAL , Jt. Secy .

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3557.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद् द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

क्रम संख्या स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक

(2)

(1)

1 आई. एस 15736: 2007 भू भौतिकीय पद्धति द्वारा भू वैज्ञानिक अन्वेषण (विद्युत प्रतिरोधित)- रीति संहिता

स्थापित तिथि

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हों, की संख्या और वर्ष

(4) (3)

30-6-2007 इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[ संदर्भः डब्लू आर डी 5/टी -26 ] ए. एम. डेविड, वैज्ञा- ई, निदेशक ( जल ससांधन विभाग ) 9831

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department ofConsumer Affairs)

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

New Delhi , the 29th November , 2007

S. O. 3557.- In pursuance of clause (b) ofsub-rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

Sl . No. No. Title and Year of the Indian Standards Established

(1)

(2)

1 IS 15736: 2007 Geological Exploration byGeophysical Method (Electrical Resistivity) Code ofPractice

SCHEDULE

Dateof Establishment

No. and Year of the Indian Standards , if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(3)

(4)

30-6-07 Copy ofthis Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: WRD-5 /T- 26] A. M. DAVID, Sc . -E, Director (Water Resources,Deptt. )

नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3558. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं:-

क्रम संख्या संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

(2)

(1)

आई. एस 2878: 2004

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि

(4) (3)

संशोधन संख्या 4 , अगस्त 2007

1फरवरी , 2008 इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 1 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयोंः नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: सीईडी/राजपत्र ] ए. के. सैनी, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी )

New Delhi , the 7 the December , 2007

S. O. 3558.- In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987 , theBureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:

Sl . No.

SCHEDULE

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

No. and Year of

the amendment

No. and Year of the Indian Standards

(2)

(1)

IS 2878 : 2004

(4)

(3)

1 February, 2008

Amendment No. 4, August 2007

Copy of this amendment is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Officer : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

4935G1/07-5

[Ref: CED/Gazette] A. K. SAINI, Sc . ' F' & Head (Civil Engg . ) 9832

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 / PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3559.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के नियम 4 के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं : -

अनुसूची क्रम सं लाइसेंस संख्या लाइसेंस प्रदान करने की तिथि

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता 1

4 1. 9619090

21-8-2007 मैसर्स टेराकॉम लिमिटेड, प्लॉट नं. 17 से 19 और 52 से 54 , सेक्टर 5 इंटीग्रटिड इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , पंत नगर ,

वस्तु/प्रक्रम सम्बद्ध भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक एवं भामा संख्या

जिला: उधम सिंह नगर , उत्तराखंड

2. 9615082

2-8-2007 मैसर्स टेराकॉम लिमिटेड प्लॉट नं. 17 से 19 और 52 से 54 , सेक्टर 5 इंटीग्रटिड इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , पंत नगर ,

आईएस 398 ( भाग 2 ) : 1996 शिरोपरि प्रेषण कार्यों के लिए एल्युमीनियम के चालक भाग 2 जस्तीकृत इस्पात प्रबलित एल्युमीनियम के चालक

जिला: उधम सिंह नगर , उत्तराखंड

3. 9622180

31-8-2007 मैसर्स बालाजी ग्रामीण विकास संस्थान स्टेट बैंक के पीछे , हरगाँव , सीतापुर-261121 यूपी 4. 9609996

4-7-2007 मैसर्स हर साहाईमल शियामलाल ज्वेलर्स 148 सिविल लाइन्स , जिला : बरेली , यूपी- 243001 5. 9610072

5-7-2007 मैसर्स कृष्णा कुमार सर्राफ , कृष्ण कुमार सर्राफ बाजार गंज मुरादाबाद , जिला मुरादाबाद, उत्तर प्रदेश -244001

2-8-2007

6. 9615183

मैसर्स जुगल किशोर ज्वेलर्स , 31/33 एम जी मार्ग हजरतगंज , लखनऊ, यूपी-226001 7. 9521178

31-8-2007 मैसर्स भगवती प्रसाद अनन्तकुमार सर्राफ 8/549, कानूनगोयन मेन रोड, समीप क्लॉकटॉवर , बाराबंकी , जिला बाराबंकी यूपी 225001 8. 9621582

5-9-2007 मैसर्स सैन दास ज्वेलर्स लखनऊ रोड , जिला हरदोई , यूपी 241001 9. 9622483

7-9-2007

आईएस 398 ( भाग 4 ) : 1994 शिरोपरि प्रेषण कार्यों के लिए एल्युमीनियम के चालक भाग 4 एल्युमीनियम मिश्रधातु के लड़दार चालक एल्युमी-मेग्नी- सिलिकॉन टाइप ,

आईएस 458 :2003 पुर्व ढले कंक्रीट पाइप (प्रबलन सहित और रहित )

आईएस 1417:1999- स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातु , आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

आईएस 1417:1999-स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातु, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

आईएस 1417: 1999- स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातु, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

आईएस 1417 : 1999- स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातु, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

आईएस 1417 : 1999- स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातु , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मैसर्स विनोद सर्राफ

सदर बाजार , जिलाः शाहजहाँपुर ,

यूपी242001

21-9-2007

10. 9626390

मैसर्ससोनागिरि यूजीएफ -17 , हरिओम कॉम्पलैक्स भूतनाथ मार्केट , इंदिरा नगर , जिला लखनऊ यूपी 226016

13-8-2007

11. 9617389

मैसर्स बीएनएसआर इंजीनियर्स( प्रा. ) लि. , सी- 333 निराला नगर , जिला लखनऊ यूपी 226020 आईएस 1417: 1999- स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातु , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

आईएस 1554 ( भाग 1 ) : 1988 पीवीसी इंसुलेटिड हैवी डयूटी इलैक्ट्रिक केबल भाग 1 1100 वो. तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता हेतु 9833

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

12. 9622281

6-9-2007 मैसर्स दि बॉम्बे बर्मा ट्रेडिंग कारपो. लि. , प्लॉट नं. 23 से 26 और 46 से 48 , सेक्टर 5 आईआईई , पंतनगर इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, सिडकल , रूद्रपुरं, जिला उधमसिंह नगर , उत्तराखंड 263153

21-9-2007

13. 9626491

मैसर्ससोनागिरि यूजीएफ -17 , हरिओम कॉम्पलैक्स भूतनाथ मार्केट , इंदिरा नगर , जिला लखनऊ उ.प्र. 226016

22-8-2007

14. 9619696

मैसर्स आर के शाह पॉलीटयूब्स, के-47/344 , विशेश्वरगंज , वाराणासी 221001

13-8-2007

15. 9617288

मैसर्स बीएनएसआर इंजीनियर्स( प्रा)लि. , सी- 333 निराला नगर, जिला लखनऊ उ.प्र. 226020

8-8-2007

16. 9616589

मैसर्स राको एग्रोकेम ( प्रा )लि. , ई 13 , यूपीएसआईडीसी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , चिन्हात , देवा रोड, जिला लखनऊ, उ.प्र. 227105

31-7-2007

17. 9613987

मैसर्स एटीपी सिल्वी (प्रोडक्ट्स) लि. , प्लॉट नं. 7 , सेक्टर 9 सिडकल , पंतनगर , रूद्रपुर, जिला उधमसिंह नगर , उत्तराखंड

9-7-2007

18. 9610577

मैसर्स बिस्लेरी इंटरनेशनल (प्रा)लि. , प्लॉट नं. 65 एवं 55 , सेक्टर 4 , आईआईई पंतनगर , रूद्रपुर , जिला उधम सिंह नगर , उत्तराखंड 263153

9-7-2007

19. $610678

मैसर्स बिस्लेरी इंटरनेशनल ( प्रा) लि. , प्लॉट नं. 65 एवं 55 , सेक्टर 4 , आईआईई पंतनगर, रूद्रपुर , जिला उधमसिंह नगर, उत्तराखंड 263153

9-8-2007

20. 9617187

मैसर्स शिर्डी इंडस्ट्रीज लि. , प्लॉट नं. 1 , सेक्टर नं. 9 आईआईई , पंतनगर, जिला उधमसिंह नगर , उत्तराखंड 263153

आईएस 2046: 1995 डेकोरेटिव थर्मोसेटिंग सिंथेटिक रेजिन बोन्डेड लेमिनेटिड शीट आईएस 2112 :2003 - चाँदी एवं चाँदी मिश्रधातु, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता और मुहरांकन

आईएस 4985 :2000 सुवाह्य जल आपूर्ति के लिए पीवीसी पाइप

आईएस 7098 ( भाग 1 ): 1988 अनुप्रस्थ जुड़े हुए पालीइथाइलीन पीवीसी रोधित खोलदार केबल भाग 11100 वो. तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए

आईएस 8446: 1991 कीटनाशक-कारबेंडाजिम ( एमबीसी) , डब्ल्यूपी

आईएस 12823 : 1990 लकड़ी उत्पाद-प्रिलेमिनेटिड पार्टिकल बोर्ड आईएस 13428 : 2005 बोतलबंद प्राकृतिक खनिज जल

आईएस 13428 : 2005 बोतलबंद पेय जल (बोतलबंद प्राकृनिक खनिज जल के अलावा)

आईएस 14587 :1998 प्रिलेमिनेटिड मध्यम घनत्व फाइबर बोर्ड

[फा. सं. सी एमडी. 13:11 ] ए. के. तलवार , उप महानिदेशक( मुहर )

New Delhi , the 7th December, 2007

S. O. 3559. In pursuance of sub -regulation (6) of regulation 4 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification ) Regulations , 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the licence particulars of which are given below have been granted with effect from the date indicated against each: (Period from 1-7-07 to 30-9-07 )

SCHEDULE

Name & Address of the Licensee

Licences

Sl.

No.

Date of granted ofLicence

CM/L-

4 2

21-08-2007

1. 9619090

M/s . Teracom Limited PlotNos . 17 to 19 & 52 to 54, Sector -5, Integrated Industrial Estate , Pant Nagar , Distt: Udham Singh Nagar , Uttarakhand

Article/Process with relevant Indian Standards covered by the licence cancelled/ suspension

IS 398: Part 2: 1996 Aluminium conductors for overhead transmission purposes: Part 2 Aluminium conductors , galvanized steel reinforced 9834

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA I , 1929

4 1

02-08-2007

2. 9615082

M/ s . Teracom Limited Plot Nos . 17 to 19 & 52 to 54 , Sector -5 , Integrated Industrial Estate, Pant Nagar , U. S. Nagar , Uttarakhand 3. 9622180 31-08-2007 M/s . Balaji Grameen Vikas Sansthan Behind State Bank , Hargaon , Sitapur , U. P- 261121

4. 9609996 04-07-2007 M/s . Har Sahaimal Shiamlal Jewellers U. P. -243001 148 Civil Lines , Distt : Bareilly,

5. 9610072 05-07-2007 M/ s . Krishna Kumar Sarraf, Krishna Kumar Sarraf Bazar Ganj Moradabad , Distt: Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh-244001 6. 9615183 02-08-2007 M/ s . Jugal Kishore Jewellers , 31/33 M.G. Marg Hazratganj , Lucknow, U. P. -226001 7. 9621178 31-08-2007 M/ s . Bhagwati Prasad Anant Kumar Sarraf, 8/549 , Qanoongoyan Main Road, Near Clock Tower , Barabanki , Distt : Bara Banki U. P- 225001

8. 9621582 05-09-2007 M/ s . Sain Das Jewellers Lucknow Road, Distt : Hardoi , U. P. - 241001 9. 9622483

07-09-2007 M/ s . Vinod Sarraf, Sadar Bazar , Distt : Shahjahanpur , U. P. -242001 10. 9626390 21-09-2007 M/s . Sonagiri UGF- 17, Hariom Complex Bhoothnath Market, Indira Nagar Distt: Lucknow U. P -226016 11. 9617389 13-08-2007 M /s . BNSR Engineers ( P) Ltd. , C-333 , Nirala Nagar, Distt : Lucknow, U. P. - 226020

12. 9622281

06-09-2007 M/ s . The Bombay Surmah Trading Corpn. Ltd. Plot Nos - 23 to 26 & 46 to 48 , Sector 5 , IIE , Pant Nagar Industrial Estate , Sidcul , Rudrapur , Distt: Udham Singh Nagar , Uttarakhand - 263153 13. 9626491 21-09-2007 M/ s . Sonagiri UGF- . 17, Hariom Complex , Bhoothnath Market, Indira Nagar , Distt: Lucknow , U. P. -226016

14. 9619696 22-08-2008 M / s . R K Shah Polytubes K-47/(344, Vishwarganj , Varanasi , UP-221001 15. 9617288 13-08-2007 M/ s . BNSR Engineers (P. ) Ltd. C-333 , Nirala Nagar Distt: Lucknow , U. P. - 226020

IS 398 :Part 4: 1994 Aluminium conductors for overhead transmission purposes : Part4Aluminium alloy stranded conductors ( aluminium magnesium silicon type)

IS458: 2003-Precast Concrete Pipes (withand without Reinforcement)

IS: 1417 : 1999-Gold and GoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness andMarking

IS: 1417: 1999-Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking

IS: 1417 : 1999-Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery / Artefacts - Fineness andMarking

IS: 1417: 1999-Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts - Fineness and Marking

IS : 1417 : 1999 -Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts - Fineness and Marking

IS: 1417: 1999-Gold and Gold Alloys, Jewellery/ Artefacts - Fineness and Marking

IS: 1417 : 1999-Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking

IS 1554: Part 1 : 1988 - PVC insulated (heavy duty) electric cables : Part I For working voltages upto and including 1100V

IS2046: 1995 - Decorative Thermosetting Synthetic Resin BondedLaminated Sheets- Specification

IS 2112: 2003 - Silver and Silver Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking - Specification

IS4985 : 2000- Unplasticized PVC Pipes for Potable,Water Supplies - Specification IS 7098: Part 1 : 1988 - Crosslinked polyethylene insulated PVC Sheathed Cables: Part 1 - For working voltage upto and including 1100 V भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ).]

4 1

16 9616589 08-08-2007 M/ s Rako Agrochem (P) Ltd. E- 13 , UPS, IDC Industrial Area, Chinhat , Deva Road, Distt: Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 227105

17 9613987 31-07-2007 M/ s ATP Silvi Products Limited PlotNo.7 , Sector 9 , Sidcul , Pantnagar, Rudrapur Distt : Udham Singh Nagar , Uttaranchal

09-07-2007

18 9610577

M/ s Bisleri International (P) Ltd. Plot No.65& 55 , Sector -4 , II E, Pant Nagar, Rudrapur Distt: Udham Singh Nagar , Uttarakhand - 263153

19 9610678 09-07-2007 M/s Bisleri International (P) Ltd. Plot No.65& 55, Sector -4, II E, Pant Nagar, Rudrapur Distt: Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand -263153

09-08-2007

20 9617187

M/ s Shirdi Industries Ltd. Plot No. 1 , Sector No. 9, II E, Pant Nagar Distt: Udham Singh Nagar Uttarakhand- 263153

9835

IS8446 : 1991-Pesticide - Carbendazim (MBC) WP - Specification

IS 12823 : 1990- Wood Products - Prelaminated Particle Boards- Specification

IS 13428 : 2005- Packaged Natural Mineral Water- Specification

IS 14543 : 2004- Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) - Specification

IS 14587 : 1998- Prelaminated medium density fibre board

[F. No. CMD- 13 : 11 ] A. K. TALWAR, Dy. Director Gen.(Marks)

नई दिल्ली , 7 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3560.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम, 1988 के नियम 5 के उपविनियम (6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तारीख से रद्द/स्थगित कर दिया गया है : -

अनुसूची क्रम सं.

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता लाइसेंस संख्या सी एम एल

1. 9140263

गैस स्टोव

मै. बाबाजी इंडस्ट्रीज गांव कचनल गाजी , काशीपुर जिला एस. नगर , उत्तरांचल 244713 2 9243172 मैसर्स भारत ऑर्गेनिक्स, 1 , सूमेर गार्डन इस्माइलगंज , लखनऊ, यूपी 226016

3 9377193 मैसर्स नार्दर्न प्लौगईवुड प्रॉडक्टस नया गांव चौहान , रामनगर , जिला नैनीताल , उत्तरांचल

4 9377597 मैसर्स हरिओम फर्टिलाइजर्स प्रा.लि. एफ -30, साइट नं. 2 , इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , जिला उन्नाव , उत्तर प्रदेश

5 9464491 मैसर्स प्यूरीस रेफ्रिजरेशन जी-5 , चिन्हात इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , देवा रोड , जिला लखनऊ , यू.पी. 226019 6 9468503 मैसर्स शिवगढ़ पॉलिटेक प्रा. लि. , बी 1 से बी 4 , बछरावन इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , जिला राई बरेली , उत्तर प्रदेश

रद्द/स्थगित करने कीतिथि

लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/प्रक्रम/संबद्ध भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

आईएस 4246 :2002- एलपीजी के साथ प्रयुक्त घरेलू 16-03 2007

आई एस 8960: 1978 - मिथाइल पैराथियॉन भुरकन चूर्ण 01-04-2007

01-5-2007

आईएस 303: 1989 सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

01-05-2007

आईएस 8960 : 1978 - मिथाइल पैराथियॉन भुरकन चूर्ण

01-04-2007

आईएस 1475 ( भाग 1 ) :2001 स्वतः भरने वाला पेयजल कूलर भाग । उर्जा खपत और कार्यकारिता

16-05-2007

आईएस 4985 : 2000 सूवाह्ना जल आपूर्ति के लिए अनम्यकृत पीवीसी पाइप 9836

[PART II- SEC. 3(ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

5 7 9501296

10-01-2007

आईएस 1238: 1996 परतचढ़ी सजावटी प्लाईवुड

मैसर्स पशुपति ऐवरेस्ट प्लाईवुड , के-2/के -3, परसा खेड़ा इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , जिला बरेली , उत्तर प्रदेश

8 9503273

23-01-2007

आईएस 1489 ( भाग 1 ) : 1991 पोर्टलैंड पोजोलाना सीमेंट भाग । फ्लाईश आधारित

मैसर्स वास्तु सीमेंट इंडस्ट्रीज , बी-1/85 सोनीविला अस्सी. , जिला वाराणसी , उत्तर प्रदेश

9 9505580

आईएस 8960: 1978 - मिथाइल पैराथियॉन भुरकन चूर्ण 07-02-2007 मैसर्स एनपीके केमीकल्स एंड इन्सेक्टीसाइडस प्रा. लि, सी-5 , इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , लच्छीपुर जिला गोरखपुर , उत्तर प्रदेश - 273015-

10 1679674

16-04-2007

आईएस 2358: 1984 फार्मूले पर आधारित स्टेबीलाइज्ड मिथोक्सीइथाइल मरकरी क्लोराइड (एमईएमसी ) सांद्र

मैसर्स केमीकल्स एंड इन्सेक्टीसाइडस , सराफ चेम्बर 447 बक्सीपुर जुबीलीचौक , जिला गोरखपुर , उत्तर प्रदेश -273015

[फ. सं. सी एम. डी. 13:13 ] ए. के. तलवार , उपमहानिदेशक( मुहर )

New Delhi , the 7th December , 2007

S. O. 3560. In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certifica- tion) Regulations , 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the licence particulars of which are given below have been cancelled/ suspended with effect from the date indicated against each: ( Period from 1-7-07 to 30-9-07 )

SCHEDULE

Name & Address of the Licensee

SI No.

Licences No. CM/L

Dateof Cancellation/ suspension

Article/ Process with relevant Indian Standards covered by the licence cancelled / suspension

5 12

16-3-07 1 9140263

IS 4246 : 2002 Domestic gas stoves for use withliquefied petroleum gas

M/ s Babaji Industries Vill . Kachnal Gazi , Kashipur, Distt . US Nagar , Uttaranchal , 244713

1-04-07 2 9243172

IS 8960 : 1978-Methyl parathion dusting powders

M/ s Bharat Organics 1, Summer Garden, IsmailGanj Faizabad Road , Lucknow, UP-226016

1-5-07 3 9377193

IS 303: 1989 - Plywood for general purposes

M/ s Northern Plywood Products Naya Gaon Chuhan , Ramnagar , Distt : Natinital , Uttaranchal

49377597

IS 8960: 1978 - Methyl parathion dusting

1-5-07

powders

M/ s Hariom Fertilizers Pvt . Ltd. F- 30, Site No.2 Industrial Estate , Distt. Unnao , Uttar Pradesh

5 9464491

1-4-07 M/ sPurys Refrigerations G-5, Chinhat Industrial Area , Dewa Road Distt . Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh -226019

IS 1475 ( Part1 ) :2001 - Self-contained drinking water coolers- Part1 : energy consumption and performance

6 9468503

16-5-07

IS4985 : 2000 - Unplasticized PVC pipes for potable water supplies

M/ s Shivgarh Polytech Pvt . Ltd. B1 to B4, Bachhrawn Industrial Area , Distt. Rae Barweily, Uttar Pradesh

10-1-07

IS 1328 : 1996- Veneered Decorative Plywood

7 9501269 M/ s Pashupati Everest Plywood K -2/ K - 3 , Parsakhera Industrial Area , Distt. Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh -243002

8 9503273

23-1-07

IS 1489 (Part1 ) : 1991 - Portland pozzoana cement Part I flyash based

M/sVastu Cement Industries B1 /85 Sonivilla , Assi , Distt . Varanasi , Uttar Pradesh भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

9 9505580 M/ s. NPK Chemicals & Insecticides (P) Ltd. C-5 , Industrial Area Lacchipur, Distt. Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh- 273015 10 1679674 M/s . Chemicals & Insecticides SarafChamber447 Buxipur, Jubeeli Chowk, Distt, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh-2730101

9837 4

7-2-07

IS 8960: 1978 - Methyl parathion dusting powders

16-4-07

IS 2358 : 1984 - Formulations based on stabilized methoxy ethyl mercury chloride (memc) concentrate.

[F.No. CMD/13 : 13 ] A. K. TALWAR , Dy. Director Gen. (Marks)

नई दिल्ली , 10 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3561.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के नियम 4 के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-

अनुसूची स्वीकृत दिनांक पार्टी का नाम एवं पता क्रम सं. लाइसेंस नं.

4 2

1. 9589212 03-04-2007 मै . एस पी लैम्प इन्ड. 305ए. माडल टाऊन जानजयाल जम्मू 9589717

03-04-2007 मै. डाटा इन्ड. , 4 , दादा कालोनी, इण्डस्ट्रियल एरिया , जिला जालन्धर , पंजाब 09-04-2007

3. 9566604

मै. शंकर इंड. जिला पार्टी पो. ओ. टारोड, टेक : साम्बा, जम्मू (जे और के) 4. 9590496 09-04-2007 मै . दशमेश प्लाइवुड , पो. ओ. फोर फील्डस , नियर कैनाल जी.टी. रोड , जिला अमृतसर , पंजाब

5. 9593304 09-04-2007 मै. सीपको सीमेंटस , प्रा. लि. सामान , खुनमोह , श्रीनगर-4 जिला जम्मू एण्ड कशमीर 6. 9593405 09-04-2007 मै. सीमको सीमेंटस , प्रा. लि. सामन, खुनमोह , श्रीनगर -4 जिला जम्मू एण्ड कश्मीर 19-04-2007

7. 9591094

मै. बोर्डर इंजी. वर्क्स , 259, फोकलप्वाइंट जिला अमृतसर पंजाब

8. 9591805 19-04-2007 मै. सुप्रीम प्लाईटयूब्स प्रा. लि. ग्राम बारदवाल , बागरानी रोड (धुरी) 1-48024

जिला : संगरूर , मानक का शीर्षक.

आईएस नं. एवं वर्ष

418: 2004 टंगस्टन फिलामेंट सामान्य सेवाविद्युत कैम्प

778 : 1984 जल कार्यों हेतु कापर एलाय गेट, ग्लोब एवं चैक वाल्व

8112 : 1989 43 ग्रेड सामान्य पोर्टलैण्ड सीमेंट

303 : 1989 सामान्य प्रयोजन हेतु प्लाईवुड

269: 1989 साधारण और अल्पता पोर्टलैण्ड सीमेंट की विशिष्टि

12269 : 1987 43 ग्रेड सामान्य पोर्टलैण्ड सीमेंट

779: 1994 वाटर मीटर (घरेलूटाइप )

4985 : 2000 पेय जल आपूर्ति हेतु अनम्यकृत पीवीसी पाइपों की विशिष्टिी 9838

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

1 2

पंजाब

9. 9580594 14-05-2007 मै. लक्ष्मी सीमेंट इन्ड. , गोल्टा खां, बाधपुरण , मोगा , (पंजाब ) जिला-मोगा पजाब

14-05-2007

10. 9581903

मै. वी टी सीमेंट प्रा. लि. मोगा रोड, धर्मकोड, जिला मोगा पंजाब

11. 9595409 14-05-2007 मै. चोपड़ा ब्रदर्स डी-60 , एस एण्ड एसजी , काम्प्लेक्स, कपूरथला रोड , जिला जालन्धर पंजाब-144 021 12. 9596209 14-05-2007 मै. वेस्टर्न केबल्स कार्पोरेशन नियर रेलवे क्रोसिंग स्टेशन रोड सरहिन्द फतेहगढ़ साहिब 13. 9598415 28-05-2007 मै . एस आर इलैक्ट्रिकल कार्पोरेशन, ग्राम-रावाली पठानकोट रोड, जिला-जालन्धर

पंजाब

14. 9598819 29-05-2007 मै. गोल्डन फलोर्स टाइल्स एण्ड कन्सर्ट प्रोडक्टस 124, इन्डस्ट्रियल एरिया फेज -1 , ' चण्डीगढ़

06-06-2007

15. 9599720

मै. भारद्वाज स्टोनवार प्रा.लि. ग्राम-लोहरा रोही, तलवान्दी रोड , तहसील जीरा जिला फिरासेजपुर पंजाब

16. 9601677 11-06-2007

श्रीनगर

मै. चेराग एसोसिएटेस फेस- II खुनंमोह , एसआईडीसीओ इण्डस्ट्रयल इस्टेट जिला- जम्मू एण्ड कश्मीर 11-06-2007

17. 9603479

मै. जी. आर इण्डस्ट्रीज के पास ) जालन्धर , एस-21 इन्ड. एरिया ( पोस्ट ऑफिस जालन्धर सिटी, जिला-जालन्धर पंजाब-144 004

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

5 पोर्टलैण्ड पोजोलोना

1489 भाग: 1 1991 सीमेंट ( पार्ट -1 ) प्लाईएश

1489 -भाग 1 : 1991 पोर्टलैण्ड पोजोलोना सीमेंट ( पार्ट-1 ) प्लाईऐश

13095 : 1991 सामान्य प्रयोजन के लिए वाटरफलाई वाल्व विशिष्टि

694: 1990 1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिये पीवीसी रोधित केबिलों की विशिष्टि

325 : 1996 श्री फेस इण्डक्शन मोटर

चकोर सीमेंट कंकरीट टाइले

13801 : 1993

651 : 1992 लवण से ग्लेज किसे स्टोनवेयर के पाइप और फिटिंग की विशिष्टि

2713 : भाग 1 शिरोपरी पावर लाइनों हेतु नलिकाकार इस्पात के खम्बे

सामान्य प्रयोजन के बाल

9890 : 1981 वाल्व-विशिष्टि भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्डः 3 (ii) ]

20/06/2007

18. 9603984

मै. गुरूनानक इंजी. एण्ड इलैक्ट्रिक वर्क्स

103 , न्यूगोकल का बाग, 100 फीट रोड, जिला अमृतसर पंजाब-143001

25/06/2007

19. 9606586

मै. एस डी वायर एण्ड केबल्स प्लाट नं. 3 बी , फेस III , इन्ड. एरिया, गंगयाल , जम्मू, जिला : जम्मू एण्ड कश्मीर 22/03/2007

20. 9589616

परफेक्ट इण्डस्ट्रीज सी-65 , फेस V, धानदारी कलां, जिला लुधियाना 25/06/2007

21. 9607184

माहाशक्ति कन्डक्टर्स इन्डस्ट्रियल इस्टेट डीजाइना (EXTNAREA ) , सतवारी जम्मू जिला-जम्मू एण्ड कश्मीर

9839

8034 : 2002 निमज्जनीय पम्पसेट-विशिष्टि

694 : 1990 विद्युत रोधक पीवीसी तार

1363 : 2002 काले षटभुज और टेपरी

398 : भाग 2 : 1996

इस्पात प्रचलित शिरोपरि प्रेषण के लिए एल्यूमिनियम चालकों की विशिष्टि- भाग-2 जस्सीकृत एल्यूमिनियम

चालक

[फा. सं. सी एम. डी. 13:11 ]

ए. के. तलवार , उपमहानिदेशक(मुहर )

NewDelhi , the 10th December , 2007

S. O. 3561.- In pursuance of sub -regulation (5 ) of the bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification ) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of which are given in the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

Licence GrantDate

Sl . No. No.

Name& Address of the party

03/04/2007

1. 9589212

M/s . S.P. Lamp Industries 305A , Model Town Gangyal Jammu. 03/04/2007

2. 9589717

M/s. Datta Industries 4, Dada Colony, Industrial area Distt : Jalandhar Punjab

09/04/2007

3. 9566004

M/ s . Shanker Industries , Vill: Patti , P.O .: Tarore , Teh . Samba, Distt; Jammu and Kashmir 09/04/2007

4. 9590496

M/ s . Dasmesh Plywood P.O. Four Fields , near Canal G.T. Road, Distt. Amritsar Punjab 09/04/2007

5. 9593304

M/s . Saifco Cements Private Limited , Saman, Khunmoh, Srinagar -4, Distt : Jammu and Kashmir JK

09/04/2007

6. 9593405

M/s. Saifco Cements Private Limited, Saman, Khunmoh , Srnaghar-4, Distt: Jammu and Kashmir JK

4935 G1/07-6

Title of the Standard

ISNo. PartSec . Year

IS418 : 2004 Tungsten filament general service electric lamps

IS 778: 1984 Globe and Check Valves for CopperAlloy Gate, Waterworks purposes

IS 8112: 1989 43grade ordinary Portland Cement.

IS 303 : 1989 Plywood for general purposes

IS 269 : 1989 33 grade ordinary Portland Cement

IS 12269: 1987 53 grade ordinary Portland Cement 9840

[PART M-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 / PAUSA 1 , 1929

4 2

7. 9591094 19/04/2007 M/ s . Border Engg . Works 259 , Focal Point, Distt . Amritsar Punjab 8.

19/04/2007

9591805

M/ s. Suprem Polytubes Pvt . Ltd. Vllage: Bardwal (out of Octroi ) Bagrian Road , (Dhuri)-148024, Distt . Sangrur Punjab

9. 9580594 14/05/2007 M/s. Luxmi Cement Industries Gholta Kalan , Baghapurana , Moga, (Punjab) Distt.: Moga Punjab 14/05/2007

10. 9581903

M/ s . Vee Tee Cement (P) Ltd. , Moga Road , Dharamkot, Distt: Moga, Punjab 14/05/2007

11. 9595409

M/ s. Chopra Brothers D- 60 , S. & Sg, Complex, Kapurthala Road , Distt.: Jalandhar , Punjab- 144021 14/05/2007

12. 9596209

M/ s. Western Cables , Corporation near Railway Crossing Station Road , Sirhind Fatehgarh Sahib 28/05/2007

13. 9598415

M/s. S. R. Electrical Corporation Vill . Raowali, Pathankot Road, Distt. Jalandhar, Punjab 29/05/2007

14. 9598819

GoldenFloors Tie & Concrete Products , 124 , Ind . Area , Phase I , Chandigarh

06/06/2007

15. 9599720

M/s. Bhardwaj Stoneware (P) Ltd. Vill . Lehra Rohi , Talwandi Road , Teh . Zira , Distt. Firozpur Punjab 16. 9601677 11/06/2007 M/ s. Charag Associates , SIDCO Indl . Estate Phase- II Khunmoh , Srinagar , Distt: Jammu and Kashmir JK .

11/06/2007

17. 9603479

M/s. G.R. Industries , S-21 Industrial Area , (NearPost Office) Jalandhar , Jalandhar City Distt : Jalandhar , Punjab 144004.

18. 9603984 20/06/2007 M/ s . Guru Nanak Engg. & Electric Works , 103 , New Gokal Ka Bagh , 100 Feet Road, Distt. AmritsarPunjab - 143001

25/06/2007

19. 9606586

M/ s . S.D. Wires & Cables , Plot No 3 B Phase III Industrial Area, Gangyal , Jammu Distt: Jammu and Kashmir JK

IS 779: 1994 Watermeters(domestic types)

IS 4985 : 2000 Unplasticized PVC Pipes for Potable Water Supplies

IS 1489 : Part 1:

1991

Portland Pozzolana Cement Part 1 Flyash

Part 1:

IS 1489 : 1991

Portland Pozzolana Cement Part1 Flyash

IS 13095 : 1991 Butterfly valves for general purposes

IS694: 1990 PVC Insulated cables for working voltage upto and including 1100 V.

IS 325 : 1996 Three - phase induction motors

IS 13801: 1993 Chequered cement concentrete tiles

IS 651 : 1992 Saltglazed stoneware pipe and fittings

IS2713 : Parts 1 to3

Tubular Steel Poles for Oerhead Power Lines

IS 9890 : 1981 General Purpose Ball Valves

IS 8034 : 2002 Submersible Pampsets

IS 694: 1994 PVC Insulted cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V.

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

20. 9589616 22/03/2007 Perfect Industries

C-65, Phase V, Dhandari Kalan, Distt . Ludhiana

25/06/2007

21. 9607184

Mahashakti Conductors:

Industrial Estate , Digiana (Extn . Area) Satwari , Jammu

Distt : Jammu and Kashmir , JK

9841

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

IS 1363 : Part 1 HexagonHead Bolts , Screws and Nuts of Product Grade ' C'- 2002

Part 1: Hexagon Head Bolts (SizeRange M 5 to M 64)

IS 398 : Part 2

1996

Aluminium conductors for overhead transmission

purposes : Part 2 Aluminium conductors , galvanized steel reinforced

[F. No. CMD/ 13 : 13 ] A. K. TALWAR,. Dy . Director General (Marks)

नई दिल्ली, 10 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3562.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम, 1988 के विनियम 5 के उपविनियम ( 6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाईसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तारीख से रद्द/स्थगित कर दिया गया है :-

अनुसूची

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पत्ता क्रम सं. लाइसेंस संख्या सीएम/एल-

1. 1175545 मै. इनोक्स एअर प्रोडक्ट लि. , जी. टी. रोड, मण्डी गोविन्दगढ़ , जिला-लुधियाना , पंजाब -147301

2.9059078 मै. राज मोल्डींग एण्ड फाउन्ड्री वर्क्स ज्वाला नगर माक्सयूडन , जिला- जालंधर, पंजाब

3. 9263784 मै. अमर, वाल्वस प्रोडक्ट्स, एस -63 इण्डस्ट्रियल एरिया , जिला जालंधर , पंजाब

4. 9386602 मै. रिसेक्स ( इण्डिया)

62-डी, फोकल पोइन्ट, फेस- V, धनदारी , लुधियाना , जिला-लुधियाना पंजाब -141010

लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/प्रक्रम /संबद्ध भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

रद्द/स्थगित करने कीतिथि

04-06-2007

आईएस 3196 ( भाग -1 ) : 1992

29-05-2007

आईएस 778 : 1984 जल कार्यों हेतु ढलवा तांबा के गेट, ग्लोब एवं चैक वाल्वस

14-05-2007

आईएस 778 : 1984 जल कार्यों हेतु ढलवां तांबा के गेट , ग्लोब एवं चैक वाल्वस

01-05:2007

आईएस 12427 : 2001 ट्रांसमीशन टावर वोल्ट-विशिष्टि

[फा. सं. सी एम. डी. - 13 : 13 ]

ए. के. तलवार, उपमहानिदेशक(मुहर )

NewDelhi , the 10th December , 2007

S. O. 3562. In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certifi- cation) Regulations 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the licences particulars ofwhich are given below have been cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Name & Address of the Licensee Sl. Licences No. No. CM/L-

M/s . Inox Air product Ltd. 1 1175545

G.T. Road , Mandi Gobindgarh , Distt.: Ludhiana Punjab - 147301

Date of

Cancellation

Article/Process with relevant Indian Standards covered by the licence cancelled

IS3196: Part 1 : 1992

04-06-2007

welded low carbon steel cylinders excluding 5 litre water capacity for low pressure liquefiable gases Part 1: cylinders for liquefied petroleum gases ( 1PG) 9842

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 / PAUSA 1 , 1929

IS 778 : 1984

29-05-2007 2. 9059078

copper alloy gate, globe and check valves for waterworks purposes

M/ s Raj Moulding & Foundry Works Jawla Nagar Maqsudan , Distt: Jalandhar, Punjab .

14-05-2007

IS 778 : 1984

3. 9263784 M/ s . Amar Valves Products ,

copper alloy gate , globe and check valves for waterworks purposes

S-63 Industrial Area, Distt: Jalandhar , Punjab .

01-05-2007

IS 12427 : 2001

4. 9386602 M/ s . Remax ( India)

fasteners - threaded steel

Fasteners-hexagon head transmission tower bolts

62-D, Focal Point, Phase -V, Dhandari , Ludhiana , Distt: Ludhiana, Punjab 141010

[F. No. CMD- 13: 13]

A. K. TALWAR , Dy . Director General (Marks )

नई दिल्ली , 12 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3563.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन मानकों के संशोधन के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और वर्ष

क्रम सं. भारतीय मानक ( कों) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक

संशोधन के स्थगित होने कीतिथि

1. आई एस 9939 : 1981 कृषि ट्रैक्टर्स एवं पावर टिलर्स संशोधन संख्या 1 वर्ष

No. & year of

Amendment

No. Indian Standards

the amendment shall have effect

31 October, 2007

Amendment No.1 Year 2007

1. IS 9939: 1981 Glossary of terms relaingto agricultural tractors and power tillers

Amendment No.1

31October , 2007

Year 2007

IS 10282 : 1982 Specification for cage wheel for powertillers 9843

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(1)

(2)

Amendment No.1

31October , 2007

Year2007

IS 13793 : 1993 Agricultural produce milling machinery - Milling of pulses - Flow diagram

Amendment No.4

30September , 2007

Year2007

IS 14543: 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water) - Specification (first revision)

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkatta Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad , Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref. FAD/G- 128 ]

SHRI K. C. S. BISHT, Scientist E & Director ( Food & Agri .)

नई दिल्ली , 12 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3564.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद् द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

(1)

(2)

31अक्टूबर , 2007 .

आई एस/ आई एस ओ 5061 :2002 पशु आहार

1. सामग्री- अरण्डी के बीज की भूसी का

निर्धारण-माइक्रोस्कोप पद्धति

31अक्टूबर , 2007 2. आई एस/ आई एस ओ 5983-1:2005 पशु आहार सामग्री -नाइट्रोजन की निर्धारण एवं क्रूड प्रोटीन की

मात्रा मापन : भाग 1 जैलडाल पद्धति

31 अक्टूबर , 2007 आई एस/ आई एस ओ 5983-2: 2005 पशु आहार सामग्री- नाइट्रोजन की निर्धारण एवं क्रूड प्रोटीन की मात्रा मापन : भाग 2 ब्लॉक पचाव/ भाप स्त्रावण पद्धति

31 अगस्त, 2007

आई एस 6283 ( भाग 2): 1998

आई एस 6283 ( भाग 2 ) :2007/आई एस ओ 3767-2: 1991 कृषि तथा वानिकी के लिए ट्रैक्टर तथा मशीनरी , पावरकृत लॉन बगीचे संबंधी उपस्कर- प्रचालक नियंत्रण तथा प्रदर्शों के लिए संकेत भाग 2 कृषि ट्रैक्टर व मशीनरी के लि संकेत ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण )

31अक्टूबर , 2007 5. आईएस/ आई एस ओ6496: 1999 पशु आहार सामग्री- आर्द्रता एवं वाष्पशील पदार्थ की मात्रा निर्धारण

31अक्टूबर , 2007 6. आईएस/आई एस ओ 6865 :2000 पशु आहार सामग्री - क्रूड फाइबर की मात्रा निर्धारण- मध्यवर्ती फिल्टरेशन पद्धति द्वारा

आई एस 9505:1980

30नवम्बर , 2007 7. आई एस 9505 :2007 मोनोसोडियम एल -ग्लूटामेट, खाद्य ग्रेड- विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

आई एस 10335:2000

30जून, 2007 8. आई एस 10335:2007 तम्बाकू और तम्बाकू उत्पाद की शब्दावली ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण ) 9844

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

आई एस 10508 : 1983

30नवम्बर, 2007 9. आई एस 10508 : 2007 फोस्फोरिक अम्ल, खाद्य ग्रेड-विशिष्टि ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

10.

आई एस 12362 ( भाग 1) : 1993

31 अगस्त , 2007 आई एस 12362( भाग 1 ) :2007/ आई एस ओ 6489-1 :2001 कृषि वाहन- कर्षण वाहनों में यात्रिक संयोजन : भाग 1 कॉटा- टाइप हुकों के आयात (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

31अक्टूबर , 2007 11. आई एस/ आई एस ओ 13904 :2005 पशु आहार सामग्री - ट्रिप्टोफैन की मात्रा निर्धारण

31अक्टूबर , 2007 12. आई एस/आई एस ओ 14718:1998 पशु आहार सामग्री-मिश्रित हार सामग्री में अफलाटाक्सिन बी, की मात्रा निर्धारण-उच्च दक्षता द्रव पद्धति द्वारा

31अक्टूबर , 2007 13. आई एस/ आई एस ओ 14902: 2001 पशु आहार सामग्री-सोया उत्पादों के ट्रिप्सिन निरोधात्मक गतिविधि का निर्धारण

30सितंबर , 2007 14. आई एस 14904:2007 पशुओं का परिवहन- रीति सांहिता ( पहला पुनरीक्षण ).

आई एस 4157 ( भाग 1 ) : 1981 , आई एस 4157 ( भाग 2 ) : 1968 और आई एस 4157 ( भाग 3 ) : 1983

30जून , 2007 15. आई एस 15743 :2007 क्लोरपाइरीफास-मिथाइल ईम्यूलसीफियबल सान्द्र- विशिष्टि

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-1120002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ, चैन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों :अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवन्तापुरम में बिक्रीहेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : एफएडी/जी-128 ]

श्री के. सी. एस. बिष्ट , वैज्ञानिक ई एवं निदेशक ( खाद्य एवं कृषि)

New Delhi , the 12th December , 2007

S.O. 3564. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule (1 ) of Rules ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each: ----

SCHEDULE

No. & Year of the

Sl .

No Indian Standards Established

Dateof Established

No.& year of Indian Standards , ifany , Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

31 October , 2007 1 . IS/ISO 5061 : 2002 Animal feeding stuffs - Determination of castor oil seed husks - Microscope method

31 October, 2007 2. IS/ISO 5983-1 : 2005 Animal feeding stuffs - Determination of nitrogen content and calculation of crude proteincontent : Part 1 Kjeldahl method

31 October, 2007 3. IS/ ISO 5983-2 : 2005 Animal feeding stuffs - Determination of nitrogen content and calculation of crude protein content : Part 2 Block digestion/steam distillation method [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(2)

(1)

9845

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

(4)

(3)

IS 6283 (Part 2): 1998

IS 6283 (Part 2) :2007/ ISO3767- 2: 1991 Tractors and machinery for agriculture and forestry, powered lawn and garden equipment - Symbols for operator controls and other displays : Part 2 Symbols for agricultural tractors and machinery (second revision)

5. IS/ISO 6496: 1999 Animal feeding stuffs - Determination of moisture and other volatile matter content

6. IS/ISO 6865: 2000 Animal feeding stuffs - Determination of crude fibre content - Method with intermediate filtration

31 August, 2007

31October, 2007

31October , 2007 IS9505: 1980

IS 9505 : 2007 Monosodium L- glutamate , food grade - Specification (firstrevision)

30November, 2007 IS10335 :2000

8. OS 10335 : 2007 Glossary ofterms for tobacco and tobacco products ( second revision)

30 June, 2007

IS 10508: 1983

9. IS 10508: 2007 Phosphoric acid , food grade - Specification ( first revision)

30November, 2007

IS 12362(Part 1 ): 1993

10. IS 12362(Part1 ) : 2007/ ISO 6489- 1 :2001 Agricultural vehicles - Mechanical connections between towed and towing vehicles: Part 1 Dimensions of hitch -hooks (second revision)

11. IS/ISO 13904 : 2005Animal feeding stuffs - Determination of tryptophan content

12. IS/ISO 14718 : 1998 Animal feeding stuffs- Determination of aflatoxin B 1 content ofmixed feeding stuffs - Method using high -performance liquid chromatography

13. IS/ISO 14902 : 2001 Animal feeding stuffs - Determination of trypsin inhibitor activity of soya products 14. IS 14904 : 2007 Transport of livestock -Code of practice ( first revision) 15. IS15743 : 2007 Chlorpyrifos -methyl emulsifiable concentrate -Specification

31 August , 2007

31October , 2007

31October, 2007

30 September, 2007

1S4157 (Part 1) : 1981 , IS4157(Part 2) : 1968 and IS4157(Part 3 ): 1983

30 June, 2007

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices :New Delhi , Kolkatta Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref. FAD/G-128] K.C.S. BISHT , Scientist E & Director (Food & Agri . ) 9846

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART I-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 17 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3565.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन विनियम ) , 1988 के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधि सूचित करता है कि जिन लाईसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं, वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं ( अगस्त 2006 से जुलाई 2007 तक ) स्वीकृत करने की लाईसेंसधारी का नाम व पता भारतीय

क्रम संख्या

लाईसेंस संख्या तिथि वर्ष/माह

1 2

1. 6594186

अनुसूची

अगस्त 2006

विभाग

वर्ष वैधता मानक शीर्षक

स्थिति स्टेटस

भा. मा. संख्या

सीइडी परिचालित 07-08-07

हाई स्ट्रेन्थ डीफोमर्ड

01-08-2006

1786 : 85

स्टील बार्स एण्ड

वायर्स फार कानक्रीट

कर्नूल रोड, प्रकाशम

वैजाक प्रोफाइल्स लिमिटेड रेडिपालेम पर्नमिटा, डिस्ट्रिक्ट, ओंगोल ,

आन्ध्र प्रदेश-523002 03-08-2006

2. 6595693

रीइन्फोर्समेन्ट

4984 : 95 सीइडी परिचालित 09-08-07

पानी की आपूर्ति के

लिए उच्च घनत्व वाले

पॉलिएथिलिन पाइप

राम टेलीकाम लिमिटेड भाग बी सर्वे नं. 45 , मल्लापूर से बोडुप्पल रोड , बोडप्पल हैदराबाद डि.

आन्ध्र प्रदेश

पेकेजबंद पेय जल

3. 6594691 04-08-2006

14543: 04 एफएडी परिचालित 08-08-07

(पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक

मिनरल जल के

आर. पी . एसोशिएट्स 12-456/5-2 , श्री रागवेन्द्रा नारसरी रोड, एन.एच. 5 , ताडेपल्ली विलेज एवं मंडल , कुंचनीपल्ली पोस्ट, गुंटूर , आन्ध्र प्रदेश -522507 4. 6593891 07-08-2006

अलावा)

14543 : 04 एफएडी परिचालित 06-08-07

पेकेजबंद पेय जल

(पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक

मिनरल जल के

अलावा)

भगीरथा अक्वा मिनरल वाटर , सर्वे नं. 400 , नारायणारेडीपेटा नेल्लूरु रूरल मंडल , आन्ध्र प्रदेश 08-08-2006

पेकेजबंद पेय जल

5. 6594489

एस. बी. बिवरेजस

प्लाट नं. 98/3 , फेस II , 14543 : 04 एफएडी परिचालित 08-08-07

( पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक

मिनरल जल के

आई डी ए, चेरलापल्ली,

हैदराबाद,

आन्ध्र प्रदेश-500051 6. 6601056 11-08-2006 हर्षा इंजिनीयर्स

प्लाट नं. 83 बी 1 ,

फेस I , आई डी ए,

अलावा)

गहराई से पानी

15500 : 02 एमइडी परिचालित 29-08-07 बाग 6

निकालने वाले हथबरमे

प्रयुक्त होने वाले पुर्जे

और विशेष औजार

जीडीमेटल हैदराबाद ,

आन्ध्र प्रदेश

14-08-2006 मरूथी सिरामिक्स

विशिष्टि

पेकेजबंद पेय जल

7. 6600862

हैच नं. 3-1-94/1 , 14543 04 एफएडी परिचालित 14-08-07

(पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक

मिनरल जल के

वस्वी नगर, सिरीसीला

कारीमनगर ,

आन्ध्र प्रदेश-505301

अलावा) [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

9847

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

1 2

8. 6596695 14-08-2006 स्वर्णा प्रोडक्ट्स 31-1 , के. एन. रोड, पुत्तूरू, चितुरूः डी, आन्ध्रा प्रदेश-517583 6

9 5

14543 : 04 एफएडी परिचालित 16-08-07

पेकेजबंद पेय जल

(पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक

मिनरल जल के

अलावा)

9. 6596897 14-08-2006

परिचालित 17-08-07 14543 04 एफएडी

पेकेजबंद पेय जल

( पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक

मिनरल जल के

अलावा)

श्री स्वर्णमुखी इन्डस्ट्रीज स्वर्णमुखी क्लामी मंगापती नायूड नगर, नायुडुपेट -524126 निल्लरू डी, आन्ध्र प्रदेश

10. 6598093 14-08-2006

13779 : 99 इटीडी परिचालित 22-08-07

ए सी स्थैतिक गंटा

मीटर वर्ग 1 और 2

विशिष्टि

होली मीटार्स इंडिया प्रा. लिमिटेड , 4-7-18/1 , इ सी आई एल रोड , रागावेन्द्रानगर नाचाराम , हैदराबाद, आन्ध प्रदेश -500016 11. 6596493 14-08-2006

सीइडी परिचालित 13-08-07

53 ग्रेड साधारण

12269: 87

पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

पानयम सीमेंट एवं मिनरल इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड बुगानापल्ली कर्नूल , सीमेंट नगर, आन्ध प्रदेश -518206 12. 6597596 17-08-2006

14543 : 04 एफएडी परिचालित 22-08-07

पेकेजबंद पेय जल

(पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक

मिनरल जल के

अलावा)

तुलसी मिनरल वाटर हैच नं. 3-203/ए, एस एन पुरम , तिरूपती -501507 चितूरू, आन्ध प्रदेश 13. 6600458 21-08-2006 श्री तुलसी अक्वा टेक 14543 : 04 एफएडी परिचालित 27-08-07

पेकेजबंद पेय जल

( पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक

मिनरल जल के

अलावा)

सर्वे नं. 4/6 , पोतीरेडीपालेम , कोवुरू मंडल, नेल्लूरूडी , मेदक, आन्ध्र प्रदेश-524137 14. 6600559 21-08-2006 श्री ललिता प्युरिफाइड

एफएडी परिचालित 27-08-07 14543 04

पेकेजबंद पेय जल

(पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक

मिनस्लजल के

अलावा)

ड्रिंकिंग वाटर इन्डस्ट्रीज श्री साई मगर पोस्ट एवं मंडल, वेमुलवाडा, करीमनगर, आन्ध प्रदेश -505302 15. 6601965 25-8-2006

परिचालित 30-08-07 5872 : 90 एमटीडी

अतप्त वेल्लित इस्पात

पत्तियां ( बक्सा बांधने

वाले) विशिष्टि

मिडफिल्ड स्टील्स प्रा. लिमिटेड प्लाट नं. 6 , फेज 4, एक्स्टेन्सन आई डी ए, जीडीमेटला , हैदराबाद , आन्ध्र प्रदेश-55 4935G1/07-7 9848

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 17th December , 2007

S. O. 3565. In pursuance of sub -regulation (5) ofthe regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulations 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule : August 2006 to July 2007 .

SCHEDULE

DATE : 01-08-2007

AUGUST 2006

S. No. CML No.

GOL Date

Status Remarks

Division

Validity

LicenseeName andAddress

IS No & Product

IS 1786 : 1985

01-08-2006

07-08-2007 CED Operative 1. 6594186 Vizag Profiles Limited Reddypalem , Parnamitta, Kurnool Road ,Ongole, Prakasam Dist . Prakasam Ongole Andhra Pradesh -523002

High strength

deformed steel

bars and wires

forconcrete

reinforcement

2. 6595693 Ram Telecom Limited

03-08-2006 IS 4984 : 1995

CED Operative

09-08-2007

High density

polyethylene pipes

for potable water

supplies

Part-B , Sy . No. 45 Mallaput to Boduppal Road Boduppal Rangareddi Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh

R.P. Associates

mineral water)

Ploy No.98/3 Phase II , IDA Cherlapally Hyderabad - 500 051 Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh - 500051

IS 15500 : Part 6 : 200

11-08-2006

6. 6601056 Harsha Engineers

29-08-2007 MED Operative Plot No.83 /B 1 , Phase I IDA, Jeedimetla Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh 500055

Deepwell hand- pumps, components and special tools - brass/ bronze components भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

7. 6600862 Maruthi Ceramics

Mangapathi Naidu Nagar Naydudpet - 524 126 Nellore District Nellore Nayudupet Andhra Pradesh -524126

10. 6598093

14-08-2006 IS 13779 : 1999

22-08-2007 ETD Operative

Ac static watthour

meters , class 1

and 2

Holley Meters India Pvt. Ltd 4-7-18/1 , ECIL Road RagavendraNagar Nacharam Ranga Reddy DistrictRangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh -500076

11. 6596493

14-08-2006 IS 12269 : 1987

CED

13-08-2007

Operative

53 grade ordinary

portland cement

PANYAM CEMENTS ANI MINERAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED Bugganapally Kurnool Cement Nagar Andhra Pradesh -518206

IS 14543 : 2004

17-08-2006 12. 6597596 Tulasi Mineral Water

22-08-2007 FAD Operative

Packageddrinking

water ( other than

packaged natural

mineral water)

H.No.3-203/A S. N. Puram Tirupathi - 517 507 Chittoor District Chittor Tirupathi Andhra Pradesh 517507

21-08-2006 13. 6600458

IS 14543 : 2004 Packageddrinking water (other than packaged natural mineralwater) Sree Tulasi Aqua Tech Sy. No. 4/6 Pothireddypalem Village Kovur Mandal Nellore District-524 137 Medak Pothireddypalem Village Andhra Pradesh 524137

IS 14543 : 2004

21-08-2006 14. 6600559

27-08-2007 FAD Operative

FAD Operative

27-08-2007

Packaged drinking

water(other than

packaged natural

mineral water)

Sri Lalitha Purified DrinkingWater Industries Sri Sai Nagar Post & Manda Vemulawada -505 302 Karimnagar District Karimnagar Vemulawada Andhra Pradesh - 505 302 9850

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

9 15 6601965 Midfield Steels Pvt. Ltd. 25-08-2006 IS 5872 : 1990

30-08-2007 MTD Operative PlotNo.6 Phase Iv

Cold rolled steel

strips(box

strappings)

Extn . , IDA Jeedimetla Hyderabad - 500 055 Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh 500055

सितम्बर , 2006

विभाग

वर्ष वैधता स्वीकृत करने की लाईसेंसधारी का नाम व पता भारतीय मानक शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

लाईसेंस संख्या

भा मा संख्या

तिथि वर्ष/माह

स्थिति स्टेटर्स

1 2

9 20-09-2006

1. 6609981

इटीडी परिचालित 25-09-2007 सुराणा टेलिकाम लिमिटेड शिरोपरि प्रेषण प्रयोजन 398 भाग

प्लाट नं : 214, 215 , के लिए एल्यूमिनियम 2:96

चालक विशिष्टि

212/3 एवं 4 , फेस- II, आइ डी ए , चेरलापल्ली , हैदराबाद , आ. प्र. - 500051

2. 6608575

1100 वाल्ट तक की

694: 90

रागावेन्द्रा इंडस्ट्रीस

परिचालित 20-09-2007 12-09-2006

इटीडी

कार्यकारी वोल्टता के

यूनिट 2 प्लॉट नं.: 34 ,

लिए पी वी सी रोधन

केबल

सर्वे नं : 125 , रोड नं 1 आइ डी ए , माल्लापूर, रंगारेडी, हैदराबाद , आ. प्र. -500076

3. 6603969 05-09-2006 खान महम्मद डाईमेंडस एवं स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण

1417-99 एमटीडी परिचालित 07-09-2009

मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं

मुहरांकन

ज्वेल्लर्स प्रा. लिमिटेड डोर नं.: 5-37-36 , दूसरी मंजिल , श्रीनीवसम 4 लेण , 2 क्रास रोड, ब्राडिपेट, गुटूरू , आ. प्र. 522002

1417-99

4. 6611362 26-09-2006 एम. भजरंग लालसन्स जेम्स स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण

एमटीडी परिचालित 02-10-2007 एवं ज्वेल्लस

मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/

5-9-338 से 341

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं

आपोजीट महबूबीया कालेज मुहरांकन

गनफोन्ड्री, हैदराबाद

आ. प्र. 500 001

5. 6603464 05-09-2006 आर एस ज्वेल्लर्स

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण

1417-99 एमटीडी परिचालित 06-09-2009 4-1-372 से 374, मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/

382, 383 ओपीपी :

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं

जी पी ओ , अबीड

मुहरांकन

हैदराबाद 500001

6. 6603767 05-09-2006 कान्ती ज्वेल्लर्स

1417-99

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण

एमटीडी परिचालित 07-09-2009 7-2-720 पोट मर्केट, मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/

सिकन्दराबाद,

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं

आ. प्र. 500001

मुहरांकन [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

5 7. 6604163 05-09-2006 लक्ष्मी ज्वेल्लर्स सी-4 , मयूर कामप्लेक्स अबिड, हैदराबाद

9851 6

9 1417-99 एमटीडी परिचालित 07-09-2009

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण

मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं

मुहरांकन

/

8. 6604769 05-09-2006

1417-99 एमटीडी परिचालित 07-09-2009

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण

मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं

मुहरांकन

डेक्कन ज्वेल्लर्स प्रा लिमिटेड 27-16-65, के बी एन कॉमप्लेक्सए बेसन्ट रोड, नीयर एल आई सी दफ्तर, विजयवाडा-530002 9. 6603666 04-09-2006

1489: भाग सीइडी परिचालित 06-09-2009 I: 91

पोर्टलैंड पोजोलाना

सीमेंट भाग I प्लाई

एश अधारित

हेमाद्री सीमेंट लिमिटेड वेदाद्री विलेज , ज्गायापेट मंडल , कृष्णा डी, आ. प्र. - 521175 10. 6610764 20-09-2006

1489: भाग सीइडी परिचालित 02-10-2007 I: 91

पोर्टलैंड पोजोलाना

सीमेंट भाग I प्लाई

एश अधारित

किरती इंडस्ट्रीस लि. हैदराबाद फेलेक्सटेक लि. , प्लाट नं : 40 आइ डी ए, बालानगर, हैदराबाद आ. प्र. - 500037 11 .. 6607775 11-09-2006

1489: 89 सीइडी परिचालित 18-09-2007 भाग [

पोर्टलैंड पोजोलाना

सीमेंट भाग I प्लाई

एश अधारित

कोरमन्डल सीमेंट लिमिटेड 6-3-652/सी/ए प्लाट नं : 5ए, कौटिल्या आमृता एस्टेट मेडीनोवा के बगल में, सोभाजीगुडा, हैदराबाद , आ. प्र. - 518206 12. 6610057 20-09-2006

इटीडी परिचालित 25-09-2007

पी वी सी इंन्सुलेटड

प्लाट नं : 214 , 215 , 212/3 सुराणा टेलीकाम लिमिटेड एवं 4 , फेस- II , आइ डी ए , चेरलापल्ली, हैदराबाद आ. प्र. -500001

( हेवी डयूटी) ऐलक्ट्रिक केबुल्स थग वर्किंग वोल्टेज तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टेज के लिए

13. 6603868 05-09-2006

1554: भाग

I : 88

2112: 03 एमटीडी परिचालित 07-09-2009

चाँदी एवं चाँदी

मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

एवं मुहरांकन विशिष्ट

खान महम्मद डाईमेंडस एवं ज्वेल्लर्स प्रा. लिमिटेड डोर नं.: 5-37-36 , दूसरी मंजिल , श्रीनीवसम 4.लेण, 2 क्रास रोड, ब्राडिपेट, गुटूरू , आ. प्र. -522002 2112: 03 एमटीडी परिचालित 26-09-2007

चाँदी एवं चाँदी

20-09-2006

14. 6610158

श्री शुभम ज्वेल्लर्स दूकान नं.: 5-37/ए, तारा नगर , लिगंमपल्ली, हैदराबाद

मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

एवं मुहरांकन विशिष्ट

आ. प्र. - 500019 15. 6604062 05-09-2006

2112: 03

07-09-2009

चाँदी एवं चाँदी

एमटीडी परिचालित

मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

एवं मुहरांकन विशिष्ट

डेक्कन ज्वेल्लर्स प्रा लिमिटेड 27-16-65 , के बी एन कॉमप्लेक्स , बेसन्ट रोड , नीयर एल आई सी दफ्तर, विजयवाडा-522002 9852

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/ PAUSA 1 , 1929

16. 6605771

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 6

9 7098 : 88 इटीडी परिचालित 12-09-2007

क्रास लिंक्डपॉलिइथीलेन

05-09-2006 सुराणा टेलीकाम लिमिटेड

प्लाट नं : 214, 2:15 ,

भाग 1

इसुलेटड पी बी सी

212/3 एवं 4 फेन्स- II , आइ डी ए, चेरल पल्ली , हैदराबाद आ. प्र. - 500051

शीयड केबल्स

1100 वोल्ट तक की

कार्यकारी वोल्टता

भाग

17. 6608070 11-09-2006

43 ग्रेड वो पी सी

पनयम सीमेंट एवं मिनरल इंडस्ट्रीस लिमिटेड भुग्गान्नापल्ली , कर्नूल सीमेंट नगर, आ. प्र. - 518206

18. 6603565 04-09-2006

8112 : 1989 सीइडी परिचालित 19-09-2007

53 ग्रेड साधारण

12269 : 87 सीइडी परिचालित 06-09-2007

पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

हेमाद्री सीमेंट लिमिटेड वेदाद्री विलेज , ज्गायापेट मंडल , कृष्णा डि, आ. प्र. - 5211.75

19. 6608272 14-09-2006

सीइडी परिचालित

12592 : 02

19-09-2007

पूर्व ढलित कंक्रीट

मैनहोल के ढक्कन व

फ्रेम विशिष्टि

इंडस्ट्रीस एस एस वि प्रिकास्ट 4/8-बी , आइडीए , नाचारम उप्पल मंडल , रंगा रेड्डि हैदराबाद , आ . प्र. - 500076 01-09-2006

सौर सपाट पट्रिका

20. 6605064

12933 भाग 1 एमइडी परिचालित 10-09-2007

संग्राहक विशिष्टि

फोटान एनर्जि सिस्टम्स लिमिटेड प्लॉट नं : 46 , अनरिच इन्डस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट, आई डी ए बोलारम, आ. प्र. -502325

21. 6610663 15-09-2006

: 2000

13488 :92 एफएडी परिचालित 02-10-2007

सिंचाई उत्सर्ज की

पाइप पद्धतियाँ

विशिष्टि

कुमार एन्टरप्राइजेस इ-10 , क‌ट्टेडॉन इंडस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट, आर आर जिल्ला, आ. प्र.-500077

13779 : 99

17-10-2007

ए सी स्थैतिक गंटा

22-09-2006 अधूरा मीटर्स प्रा लि.

22. 6615976

इ टी डी परिचालित

मीटर वर्ग 1 और 2

विशिष्टि

हैच नं. , 6-59 59/1 एवं 60, प्लांट नं 3 , 1 एवं 2 फ्लोर आपोजिट आइ डी पी एल फैक्टरी गेट लेण , बालानगर, हैदराबाद , आ. प्र. - 500037

परफेक्ट आग्रो प्राडक्टस 23. 6605367 11-09-2006

पेकेजबंद पेय जल

14543 : 04 एफएडी परिचालित 12-09-2007

[ पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक

मिनरल जल के

प्लाट नं : 4बी , ब्लाक नंः 4 आटो. नगर ,

हैदराबाद -500062

अलावा] 05-09-2006

24. 6605468

पेकेजबंद पेय जल

श्री रेणुका बिवरेजस

इंडस्ट्रीस

14543: 04 एफएडी परिचालित 12-09-2007

[पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक

मिनरल जल के

प्लॉट नं : 3-28 ,

अलावा ]

जमीचेड विलेज गदवाल मंडल , महबूबनगर , आ. प्र.- 509125 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

अलावा ]

इन्द्रकीलागी बिवरेजस डोर नं: 1:5-78 , एम पी रोड, गोल्लापुडी, विजयवाडा, कृष्णा, आ. प्र.- 521225

11-09-2006

30. 6607977

14543: 04

18-09-2007 एफएडी परिचालित

पेकेजबंद पेय जल

[पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक

मिनरल जल के

अलावा]

विनयका बिवरेजस सर्वे नं: 171 , प्लाट नं: 15 एवं 16 , आमीनपूर , पटनचेरूवु, मेदक , आ. प्र.

31. 6607876 05-09-2006 हर्षा इंजनीयर्स प्लाट नं : 83 बी 1 , फेस 1 , आइडीए जीडीमेटला हैदराबाद 500055

गहराई से पानी निकालने वाले हथबरमे प्रयुत्त होने वाले पुर्जे अर विशेष औजार विशिष्टि

SEPTEMBER 2006

GOL Date

IS No& Product LicenseeName and Address

S. No. CML No

Surana Telecom Limited 20-09-2006 1. 6609981

Plot No.214 , 215,212/3 & 4

Phase- II , IDA

Cherlapally

Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh

IS 398 : Part 2 : 1996 Aluminium conduc- tors for overhead transmission purposes: part 2 aluminium conductors , galvanized steel rein- forced 500051

IS 694: 1990

12-09-2006 2. 6603575 Raghavendra Industries -

Unit-II

Plot No.34 , Sy.No.125,

15500: 04 एमइडी परिचालित 18-09-2007 भाग 4

Division Status Remarks Validity

9 15-09-2008 ETD Operative

ETD

20-09-2007

Operative

Pvc insulated cables

forworking voltages

uptoand including

1100 v

Road No.1 , IDA, Mallapur , Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh 500076 9854

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

4 3. 6603969

05-09-2006

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 6

IS 1417 : 1999

Khan Mohammed Diamonds and Jewellers (P) Ltd D.No.5-37-36, 2nd Floor Srinivasam, 4th Lane 2nd Cross Road, Brodipet, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh- 522002

4. 6611362

26-09-2006

MTD

07-09-2009

Operative

Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts - fineness and marking

IS 1417 : 1999

02-10-2009 MTD Operative

Gold and gold alloys ,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking

M. Bajrang Lal Sons Gems & Jewels 5-9-338 to 341 , Opp: MahaboobiaCollege, Hyderabad, Gunfoundry, Andhra Pradesh - 500001

5. 6603464 R. S. Jewellers

05-09-2006 4-1-372 to 374,382,383 Opp: GPO Abids, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh - 500001

6. 6603767 Kanti Jewellers 7-2-720 PotMarket, Hyderabad Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh -500003

7. 6604163 Lakshmi Jewellers

05-09-2006

IS 1417 : 1999

MTD

06-09-2009

Operative

Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts - fineness and marking -

07-09-2009 MTD Operative

05-09-2006 IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts - fineness and marking

IS 1417 : 1999

07-09-2009 MTD Operative

Gold and gold alloys ,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking

C-4, Mayur Kushal Complex, Gunfoundry, AbidsHyderabad Andhra Pradesh

8. 6604769 Deccan Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. 05-09-2006 27-16-65 , KBN Complex

IS 1417 : 1999

07-09-2009 MTD Operative

Gold and gold alloys,

jewellery/ artefacts -

fineness and marking

Besant Road, Near LIC Office, Krishna, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh - 520002

9. 6603666 Hemadri Cements Limited 04-09-2006 Vedadri Village, Jaggayyapet Mandal- 521175 Krishna District Krishna, Jaggayyapet Mandal , Andhra Pradesh - 521175

20-09-2006 10. 6610764 Keerthi Industries Ltd. , C/oHyderabad Flextech Ltd. , Plot NoAO , IDA, Balanagar Hyderabad- 500037 Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh -500082

11. 6607775 Ckoramaandel Cements 11-09-2006 199131-08-2008 CED Operative

IS 1489 : Part 1 : Portland Pozzolana cement part 1 flyash based

30-09-2009 CED Operative

IS 1489 : Part 1 : 1991 Portland Pozzolana cement part 1 flyash based

IS 1489 : Part 1 : 1991 15-09-2008 CED Operative

Portland Pozzolana

cement part 1 flyash

based

Limited 6-3-652/ C/A Flat No. 5A, Koutilya Amritha Estates Beside Medinova Somajiguda Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh -500082 [ 'भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

12. 6610057

9855

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

IS 1554 : Part I : 1988

20-09-2006 Surana Telecom Limited , Plot No.214, 215/212/3 & 4 Phase - II, IDA, Cherlapally Rangareddi , Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh- 500051

05-09-2006 13. 6603868 Khan Mohammed Diamonds and Jewellers (P) Ltd. , D.No.5-37-36 , 2nd Floor, Srinivasam, 4th Lane, 2ndCross Road, Brodipet, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh- 522002

14. 6610158

20-09-2006 Shree Shubham Jewellers Shop No.5-37/A, Tara Nagar, Lingampalli , Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh- 500019

15. 6604062

(05-09-2006 Deccan Jewellers Pvt . Ltd. , 27-16-65 , KBN Complex, BesantRoad, Near LIC Office , Krishna Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh - 520002

16. 6605771

(05-09-2006 Surana Telecom Limited , Plot No.214, 215,212/3 &4 Phase - II , IDA, Cherlapally, Rangareddi , Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh -500051

17. 6608070

11-09-2006 15-09-2008 ETD Operative

PVC insulated (heavy duty) electric cables: part 1 for working voltages upto and including 1100 V

07-09-2009 MTD Operative

IS2112 : 2003 Silver and silver alloys, jewellery/artefacts - fineness and marking

MTD Operative 26-09-2007

IS 2112 : 2003 Silver and silver alloys , jewellery/artefacts - fineness and marking

Operative 07-09-2009 MTD

IS 2112 : 2003 Silver and silver alloys , jewellery/artefacts - fineness and marking -

IS 7098 : Part 1 : 1988 31-08-2008 ETD Operative

Crosslinked polye- thylene insulated PVC sheathed cables: part 1 forworking voltage upto and including 1100 V

15-09-2008 CED Operative

IS 8112 : 1989

43grade ordinary

portland cement

Panyam Cements and Mineral Industries Limited, Bugganapally, Kumool , Cement Nagar , Andhra Pradesh - 518206

18. 6603565

(04-09-2006 31-08-2008 CED Operative

IS 12269 : 1987

53grade ordinary

portland cement

Hemadri Cements Ltd. , Vedadri Village, Jaggayyapet Mandal , Krishna District, Jaggayyapet , Andhra Pradesh

19. 6608272

14-09-2006 SSV Precast Industries 4/8 -B, IDA, Nacharam Uppal Mandal , Rangareddi , Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh -500076

20. 6605064.

(01-09-2006 Photon Energy Systems Limited, Plot No. 46 , Anrich Industrial Estate , IDA, Bollaram , Medak, Bollarum, Andhra Pradesh- 502325

4935 G1/07-8

Operative

CED

15-09-2008

IS 12592 : 2002 Precast concrete manhole cover and frame -

MED Operative 31-08-2008

IS 12933 : Part 1 : 2000 Solar flat plate collector - : part 1 requirement 9856

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

4 1

5 21. 6610663

15-09-2006 IS 13488 : 1992

Kumar Enterprises

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 6

9 .

30-09-2008 FAD Operative

Emitting pipes

system

E- 10 , Kattedan Indl . Estate Rangareddi , R.R. District Andhra Pradesh - 500077

22. 6615976 Adura Meters Pvt . Ltd. 22-09-2006 IS 13779 : 1999 Ac static watthour meters, class 1 and 2 H.No.6-59 , 59/1 &60 PlotNo.3 , 1st & 2nd Floor Opp . IDPL Factory Gate Lane,Balanagar Hyderabad - 500 037 Rangareddi , Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh - 500 037

11-09-2006 IS 14543 : 2004

Perfect Agro Products

23. 6605367

17-10-2007 ETD Operative

12-09-2007 FAD Deferred

Packageddrinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineral water)

PlotNo. 4B, Block No.4 Autonagar Hyderabad - 500 070 Rangareddi , Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh- 500 070

05-09-2006 IS 14543 : 2004

24. 6605468

12-09-2007 FAD Operative

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineral water)

Sree Renuka Beverages Industries Plot No.3-28 Jamiched Village 509 125 Gadwal Mandal Mahaboobnagar District Mahabubnagar Jamiched Village Andhra Pradesh - 509 125

25. 6605872

11-09-2006 IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water) Annamayya Industries C/o Sai Jewellery Near Prakasam Statue Gandhi Road Ongole - 523 001 Prakasam District Prakasam , Ongole Andhra Pradesh - 523001

mineral water)

Sy.No.79/2B Gundlapalli Village Ongole - 523 211 Maddipadu Mandal Prakasam District Prakasam, Ongole Andhra Pradesh - 523 211 9857

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

29. 6608474

11-09-2006 IS 14543 : 2004

20-09-2007 FAD Deferred Indrakiladri Beverages

Packageddrinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water) -

D.No.15-78 , M.P Road Gollapudi Village Vijayawada - 521 225 Krishna, Vijayawada Andhra Pradesh-521 225

30. 6607977

11-09-2006

15-09-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packageddrinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water) -

VinayakaBeverages Sy. No. 171 , Plot No.15 & 16 Ameenpur Village Patancheru Mandal Medak District-Medak AmeenpurVillage Andhra Pradesh

MED Deferred

18-09-2007

05-09-2006 IS 15500 : Part 4: 200

31. 6607876 Harsha Engineers Plot No, 83 /B1 , Phase I IDA , Jeedimetla Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh 500 055

Deepwell handpumps , components and special tools- steel components

अक्तूबर , 2006

वर्ष वैधता विभाग स्थिति स्टेटस लाईसेंस स्वीकृत करने की लाईसेंसधारी का नाम व पता भारतीय मानक शीर्षक भ.ा मा.

संख्या

क्रम संख्या संख्या तिथि वर्ष/माह

9 1

2007-10-08 एफएडी प्रचालित

14543 04

1. 6613568 2006-10-03

पेकेजबंद पेय जल

[पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक

मिनरल जल के

अलावा ]

मिश्बा फुड प्रोडक्ट्स डि. नं. 24/1/1223 , बशीर नगर , कलेक्टर बंगला के सामने, दर्गमिट , नेल्लूर

2. 6613669 2006-10-03

2007-10-10 एफएडी प्रचालित

14543 04

पेकेजबंद पेय जल [ पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक.. मिनरल जल के अलावा ]

तिरुमला मिनरल्स सर्वे नं 220/ 1 ए , प्लाट नं. 12, तिम्मनायुडु पालेंम विलेज तिरुपति अर्बन , चित्तुर डि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश

2007-10-08 ईटीडी प्रचालित

1554 भाग

3. 6613467 2006-10-04

पीवीसी इन्सुलेटड

1: 1998

(हेवी डयूटी इलेक्ट्रिक केबुल्स भांग 1 वर्किंग वोल्टेज तक की कार्य- कारी वोल्टेज के लिए

एस पी एम टेलिकाम प्लाट नं. 136/2 , फेस II आईडीए , चेरलपल्ली आरआरडी -500 051 (आ. प्र. )

प्रचालित

2007-10-04 ईटीडी

4. 6612768 2007-10-04

ऐसी वाट अवर मीटर , 13010 :

क्लास 0.5 , 1 एण्ड 2 2002

होली मीटर्स इंडिया प्रा. लि. 4-7-18/1 ए, ईसीएएल रोड, राधवेन्द्र नगर , नाचाराम रंगारेड्‌डी, हैदराबाद आन्ध्र प्रदेश-500 076

5. 6615673

14543: 04 2007-10-16 एफएडी प्रचालित 2006-10-09

पेकेजबंद पेय जल

[पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक

मिनरल जल के

अलावा]

शोबना आक्वा इंडस्ट्रीस एच नं. 3-99/1 , टेलिफोन एक्सचेंज के सामने मोईनाबाद विलेज एण्ड मंडल, रंगारेड्‌डी तालुक, आन्ध्र प्रदेश 9858

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1,1929

6. 6613770 20-06-1010

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 5

2007-10-10 एफएडी प्रचालित 14543: 04

पेकेजबंद पेय जल

[पेकेजबंद. प्राकृतिक

मिनरल जल के

अलावा]

श्री रोजा प्यूरीफाईड ड्रिंकिंग वाटर हनुमतगिरि, जम्मलमडुगु मंडल , कड़पा डिस्ट्रिक्ट, आन्ध्र प्रदेश

7. 6614469 2006-10-11

प्रचालित 14543: 04 2007-10-11 एफएडी

पेकेजबंद पेय जल

[पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक

मिनरल जल के

अलावा]

आक्वाभवानी प्यूर अंड हेल्ली ड्रिंकिंग वाटर 5-54, बंजारा कालोनी , कर्नूल, आन्ध्र प्रदेश 8. 6617071 2006-10-18 आर एस ज्वेलर्स 6-3-789, पावनी फ्रेस्टेज , अमीरपेट, हैदराबाद , आन्ध्र प्रदेश

1417: 99 2009-10-22 एमटीडी प्रचालित

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण

मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं

मुहरांकन

9. 6616877 2006-10-19 श्री रंका ज्वेलर्स 7/2-763 , पाट मारर्केट , सिकिंदराबाद -500003 आन्ध्र प्रदेश

1417: 99 2009-10-19 एमटीडी प्रचालित

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण

मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं

मुहरांकन

10. 6616978 2006-10-19 बालाजी ज्वेलर्स 5-8-554 एवं 555 आबिद रोड , हैदराबाद , आन्ध्र प्रदेश-500001 1417: 99

एमटीडी प्रचालित

2009-10-19

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण

मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं

मुहरांकन

2006-10-20

li . 6616776

8112: 89

प्रचालित

2007-10-19 सीइडी

43 ग्रेड साधारण

पोर्टलैंड सिमेंट

हेमार्दि सिमेंटस लिमिटेड प्लाट नं. 509, पाँचवी मंजिल पंजागुट्ट , हैदराबाद , आन्ध्र प्रदेश-500082

हर्ष प्लास्टिक्स 12. 6618679 2006-10-23

7231 : 94 2007-10-26 सीइडी प्रचालित

अंग्रेजीटट्रियों तथा

डालयों के लिए

प्लास्टिक की प्रधवना

टंकियों विशिष्टि

सर्वे नं. 182 , गगनपाहाड विलेज , वोल्ड कर्नूल रोड, रेलवे गेट के पास , रंगारेड्डी आन्ध्र प्रदेश-501323 13. 6624069 2006-10-23

जनरल रिक्वैरमेंटस

मानकसिया लिमिटेड पेपर पेकेजिंग विभाग प्लाट नं. 45- सी, फेस I , आईडीए , जिडिमेटला हैदराबाद-500055 अ.प्र.

फार 10212: भाग 2007-11-15 सीएचडी प्रचालित I : 1986

पैकेजस आफ

एक्सप्लोसिव

भाग 1: कमर्शियल हाई

एक्सप्लोसिव

14. 6617879 2006-10-23 जे पी ज्वेलरी 18-19 , बाजार स्ट्रीट , हैदराबाद , आन्ध्र प्रदेश 1417: 99

प्रचालित

2009-10-25 एमटीडी

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण

मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं

मुहरांकन

2006-10-23

15. 6617980

लालचंद हस्तिमल ज्वेलर्स पॉट मार्केट ( मोड के पास ) सिकंदराबाद , हैदराबाद 1417: 99

प्रचालित

एमटीडी

2009-10-25

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण

मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं

मुहरांकन

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

9859

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

9 6

2009-10-25 एमटीडी प्रचालित

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण

66168073 2006-10-23 सुरजभान ज्वेलरी एण्ड 16.

एक्सपोर्टर्स

1417: 99

मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं

मुहरांकन

3-6-2/1 , लिबर्टी रोड, हिमायतनगर, हैदराबाद, आन्ध्र प्रदेश--500029 17. 6618174 2006-10-23

2009-10-25 एमटीडी प्रचालित 1417: 99

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण

तिरुमला ज्वेलर्स 5-8-582 , आबिड रोड, हैदराबाद

मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं

आन्ध्र प्रदेश -500001 18. 6619580 2006-10-23 वैबव ज्वेलर्स

7ए-9-21/ 1 , मेइन बाजार, वेस्टगोदावरी , एलूरु

मुहरांकन

प्रचालित 1417: 99 2009-10-31 एमटीडी

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण .

विशाखापटनम कार्यालय को बदली हो गया ।

मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं

आन्ध्र प्रदेश-534001 2006-10-23 बालाजी वाटर वर्क्स

मुहरांकन

पेकेजबंद पेय जल

19. 6618265

2007-10-25 एफएडी प्रचालित 14543: 04

[पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक

मिनरल जल के

13-94, गोपाल नगर , कोत्तपेट पी ओ चीराला-523155

प्रकासम तालुक आन्ध्र प्रदेश

OCTOBER 2006

Licensee Name

GOL Date S. No. CML No. and Address

Misba Food Products

अलावा ]

IS No. &

Remarks

Division Status

Product

Validity

9 6

08-10-2007 FAD

IS 14543 : 2004

03-10-2006 1. 6613568

D. No. 24/1/1223 ,

BasheerNagar,

Operative

Packageddrinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineral water)

Near Collector Bungalow Nellore , Nellore DargamittaNellore Andhra Pradesh

03-10-2006 Tirumala Minerals

2. 6613669

FAD

IS 14543 : 2004 10-10-2007

Operative

Packaged drinking

Sy . No. 220/1 , Plot No. 12

Timminaidupalem Village

packaged natural

Tirupati Urban

water (other than

mineralwater)

Chittoor District Chittor Timminaidupalem

Village Andhra Pradesh

SPM TELECOM

04-10-2006 3. 6613467

Plot No. 136/2, Phase - II

IDA, Cherlappaly , Rangareddi , Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh, 500051

04-10-2006 4. 6612768 Holley Meters India

Pvt. Ltd.

4-7-18/ 1 , ECIL Road,

Ragavendra Nagar , Nacharam, Rangareddi Hyderabad

Andhra Pradesh, 500076

08-10-2007

IS 1554: Part 1 : 1988

ETD Operative

PVC insulated (heavy

duty) electric cables: Part 1 for working voltages upto and including 1 100 v

ETD

IS 13010 : 2002 04-10-2007

Operative

Ac watthour meters ,

class 0.5 , 1 and 2- 9860

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA.: DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1,1929

4 1

5. 6615673

IS 14543 : 2004

09-10-2006 Shobana Aqua Industries

[PART II-SBC. 3( ii) ] 6

16-10-2007 FAD Operative

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineral water)

H. No.3-99/1 Opp. Telephone Exchange Moinabad Village & Mandal Ranga Reddy District Rangareddi , Moinabad, Andhra Pradesh

6. 6613770

10-10-2006 10-10-2007 FAD

IS 14543 : 2004

Operative

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineral water)

Sri Roja Purified Drinking Water Hanmathgiri Jammalamadugu Mandal Cuddapah District Cuddapah , Jammalamadugu , Andhra Pradesh

7. 6614469

IS 14543 : 2004

11-10-2006 Aqua Bhavani Pure &

11-10-2007 FAD Operative

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineral water)

Healthy Drinking Water #5-54 Banjara Colony , Kurnool , Kurnool Mandal , Kurnool District , Kurnool , Andhra Pradesh

IS 1417 : 1999

18-10-2006 8. 6617071 R.S. Jewellers

6-3-789

22-10-2009 MTD Operative

Gold and gold alloys ,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking

Pavani Prestige Ameerpet, Hyderabad , Andhra Pradesh

IS 1417 : 1999

19-10-2006 9. 6616877 Sri Ranka Jewellers

MTD

19-10-2009

Operative

Gold and gold alloys ,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking

7-2-763 , PotMarket , Hyderabad , Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh -500003

10. 6616978

IS 1417 : 1999

19-10-2006 Balaji Jewellery 5-8-554 & 555 Abid Road, Hyderabad , Andhra Pradesh -500001

11. 6616776

IS 8112 : 1989

Hemadri Cements Ltd. 20-10-2006 ModelHouse

MTD

19-10-2009

Operative

Gold and gold alloys , jewellery /artefacts - fineness and marking

19-10-2007 CED Operative

43grade ordinary

portland cement

Plot No. 509 , 5th Floor , Panjagutta Hyderabad- 500082 Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh -500082

IS 7231 : 1994

12. 6618679 Harsh Plastics

23-10-2006 26-10-2007 CED Operative

Plastic flushing

cisterns for water

closets and urinals

SY. No. 182, Gaganpahad Village , Old Kurnool Road , Near Railway Gate , Rangareddi , Gaganpahad Village , Andhra Pradesh-501323

13. 6624068

23-10-2006 Manaksia Limited Div: Paper Packaging , Plot No. 45 -C , Phase - I , IDA Hyderabad , Jeedimetla, Andhra Pradesh - 500055

19815-11-2007 CHD Operative

IS 10212 : Part 1 : General requirements forpackages of explosives: part 1 commercial high explosives [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

5 1

23-10-2006 146617879 J.P. Jewellery

18-19 , Bazar Street, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh

9861

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

9. 6

25-10-2009 MTD

IS 1417 : 1999

Operative

Goldand gold alloys,

jewellery/artefacts -

fineness and marking

23-10-2006 25-10-2009

IS 1417 : 1999

Transferred Transferred

IS 1417 : 1999

31-10-2007 MTD

Gold and gold alloys ,

jewellery/artefacts

fineness and marking

23-10-2006 Balaji Water Works

19 6618275

IS 14543 : 2004

FAD

25-10-2007

Operative

Packageddrinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineral water)

13-94, Gopal Nagar Kothapet P.O Chirala - 523 155 Prakasam District Prakasam , Chirala Andhra Pradesh -523155

अनुसूची

नवम्बर , 2006

लाईसेंसधारी का नाम व पता भामा संख्या वर्ष संख्या विभाग

भारतीय मानक

काशीर्षक

क्रम लाईसेंस संख्या संख्या

स्वीकृत करने की तिथि वर्ष/माह

1 2

श्री विमला ज्वेलरी मार्ट 1. 6623066 09-11-2006

स्थिति स्टेटस 6

12-11-2009

परिचालित 1417 99

एमटीडी

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र

बाजार स्ट्रीटः चित्तूर , पुत्तूर,

आन्ध्र प्रदेश -517583

धातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

एवं मुहरांकन

डी ओडरैसिंग कम

14-11-2006 स्पेसिफिक लेबोरेटरीस 2. 6630568

प्रा. लिमिटेड

1-20-248, उमजेय कांप्लेक्स, रसूलपुरा , सिकिंदराबाद-500003 आ.प्र.

आर के ज्वेलर्स 3. 6623975 16-11-2006

सीएचडी परिचालित 10758 : 05-12-2007

1983

डिसिफक्टेंट

फूलइड्स

1417 99 15-11-2009 एमटीडी परिचालित

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र

12-2-122 ,

धातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

एवं मुहरांकन

निम्मकायला स्ट्रीट , चित्तूर तिरुपती, आन्ध्र प्रदेश -517501 9862

एवं मुहरांकन

जे आर ज्वेलर्स दुकान नं. 18 , विजया कमरशीयल कामप्लेक्स , जेडी हास्पिटल रोड, गवरनरपेट , विजयवाडा, क्रिष्ण, आ. प्र. - 500002

प्रेमराज शांतीलाल जैन

10. 6625070 17-11-2006

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र 1417 99 19-11-2009 एमटीडी परिचालित ज्वेलर्स

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

धातुएं, आभूषण/

एवं मुहरांकन

7-2-714 अंड 7-2-773/3 जीपाट मारकेट, सिंकिदराबाद , आन्ध्र प्रदेश

11. 6625171 17-11-2006

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र 1417 99 19-11-2009 एमटीडी परिचालित एल बजरंगप्रशाद ज्वेलर्स

धातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

एवं मुहरांकन

दुकान नं 7 , 8 , 9 और 10 बाबूखान एस्टेट बशीरबाग , हैदराबाद -500001 आन्ध्र प्रदेश

प्रिन्सज्वेलर्स

12. 6625272 17-11-2006

5/10 , एम जी स्ट्रीट चित्तूर , श्रीकालहस्थी आन्ध्र प्रदेश -517644

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र 1417 99 19-11-2009 एमटीडी परिचालित धातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन 9863

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22, 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

जे सी ब्रदर्स ज्वेलर्स 13. 6625474 17-11-2006

एमटीडी

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र- 141799

19-11-2009

परिचालित

धातुएं , आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

16-11-515/ए/ 1 अंड 2 मेनरोड, दिलसुकनगर हैदराबाद-500036 एवं मुहरांकन

आन्ध्र प्रदेश

14. 6625575 17-11-2006

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र- 1417 99

19-11-2009 एमटीडी परिचालित

धातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

एवं मुहरांकन

श्री एस के ज्वेलर्स 27-14-17- राजागोपालाचारी स्ट्रीट, गवरनरपेट , विजयवाडा, क्रिष्ण, आ. प्र.-520002

बंबे गोल्ड शापी 15. 6625676 17-11-2006

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र- 1417 : 99 19-11-2009 एमटीडी परिचालित

धातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

एवं मुहरांकन

डि नं. 24-14-70, दत्तार्तेया कामप्लेक्स, राजागोपालाचारी स्ट्रीट गवरनरपेट, विजयवाडा, क्रिष्ण, आ. प्र.-500002 16. 6625373 17-11-2006

परिचालित

रजित एवं रजित मिश्र 2212 : 25-10-2009 एमटीडी

2003

धातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

एवं मुहरांकन

सुरजभान बाबुलाल एण्ड कं. ज्वेलर्स 59-29/12 और 13 , बर

हैदराबाद-500053 अ.प्र.

परिचालित

सीईडी

1489 23-11-2007

पोर्टलैंड पोजलोना

पान्यम् सिमेंर्ट एण्ड मिनरल 17. 6627680 22-11-2006

(Pt 1: 91 )

सिमेंट भाग 1

प्लैयाष बेस्ड

इंडस्ट्रीस लिमिटेड बुग्गानापल्ली सिमेंटनगर कर्नूल हैदराबाद-518206 म.प्र.

18. 6627781 27-11-2006

परिचालित 1786 : 1985 26-11-2007 सीईडी

कंक्रीट प्रबलन हेतु

इस्पात को विक्रत

संरिये, उच्च सामध्यौँ

कीविशिष्टि

मै. शालीनी स्टीस प्रा. लि. प्लाट नं. 164, 164/ए, 165 और 166, श्री वेंकटेश्वरा को. अ. इंडस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट मयियापूर, बोल्लासम मेदक डि. -502325 म.प्र.

19. 6630063 30-11-2006 श्री बालाजी ज्वेलर्स सीपी रेड्डी कांप्लेक्स चौरास्ता, वरंगल ,

परिचालित

एमटीडी

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र 1417 : 99 04-12-2009

धातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

एवं मुहरांकन

हनुमकेंडा-506002 अ.प्र.

एम. बजरंगलाल सन्स 20. 6630164 30-11-2006

ज्वेलर्स

परिचालित

एमटीडी

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र- 1417 : 99 04-12-2009

धातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

मकान नं 5-9-279 दुकान नं सी 3 और 5 मयूरकुषाल शापिंग कांप्लेक्स, गनफँड्री

हैदराबाद-500001 अप्र

श्रीरामज्वेलरी 21. 6630265 30-11-2006

4-1-857 , आबिडरोड

एवं मुहरांकन

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र- 1417 : 99 04-12-2009 एमटीडी परिचालित

धातुएं, आभूषण/

हैदराबाद-500001 अ.प्र.

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

एवं मुहरांकन

4935 G1 /07-9 9364

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

22. 6631873 30-11-2006 श्री लक्ष्मीगणापती

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 5

9 12225 :

एमईडी परिचालित

11-12-2007

सेंट्रीप्यूगल जेट पंप

इंजनीरिंग वर्क्स

दूसरी मंजिल , श्री विजयलक्ष्मी हौसिंग कांप्लेक्स, चेंन्चुपेट तेनाली-500002 गुन्दूरडि. ( अ.प्र. ) 30-11-2006

23 603172

1999

12640

परिचालित

11-12-2007 एमईडी

घरेलू एवं समान

प्रयोजनों के लिए

(भाग 1) :

अवशिष्ट करंट

2000

चालित सर्किट

वियोजक

गटस इलेक्ट्रोमेक लिमिटेड प्लाट नं. 163 सी एंड 164 ई आई डी ए, फेज II चेरलापल्ली, हैदराबाद -500051 अ.प्र.

Date: 01-08-2007

November, 06

CML No.

S.No.

GOL Date Licensee Name and Address

Status

IS No & Product

Division

Validity

IS 1417 : 1999

09-11-2006 1. 6623066 Sri Vimala Jewellery

Mart

Bazar Street Chittor Puttur, Andhra Pradesh - 517583

12-11-2009 MTD Operative

Gold and gold

alloys, jewellery/

artefacts - fineness

andmarking

14-11-2006 2. 6630568 Specific Laboratories

05-12-2007 CHD Operative

IS 10758 : 1983

De-odorising-cum-

disinfactant fluids

Pvt. Ltd. 1-20-248 Umajay Coniplex, Rasoolpura , Secunderabad, Hyderabad, Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh- 500003

3 6623975 R. K. Jewellers

12-2-122 , Nimmakayala StreetChittor Tirupati , Andhra Pradesh -517501

16-11-2006 6624169 Suraj Bhan Babulal

& Co. Jewellers 59-29/12 & 13 , Basheerbagh , Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh - 500063

5. 6624573 Om Sai Jewellers

17-11-2006 Konark Theatre Lane , Shop No. 1 , House No. 7-45 , Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh - 500060

15-11-2009 MTD Operative

16-11-2006 IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and gold alloys,jewellery/ artefacts - fineness and marking

16-11-2009 MTD Operative

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and gold alloys, jewellery/ artefacts - fineness and marking

19-11-2009 MTD Operative

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and gold alloys, jewellery/ artefacts -fineness and marking [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) )

9865

भारत' का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1, 1929

1 2

5 6. 6624674 Sri Srinivasa Jewellers 17-11-2006 IS 1417: 1999 6

8 19-11-2009 MTD Operative

Goldandgold

alloys,jewellery/

artefacts-fineness

andmarking

Shop No.5-39, Taranagar, LingampallyPO, Rangareddi SeriLingampally Municipality Andhra Pradesh-500019

IS 1417: 1999 7. 6624775

17-11-2006 19-11-2009 MTD Operative

Goldand gold

allcys,jewellery/

artefacts - fineness

andmarking

Ravi Jewellery Company Shop No. 9 , Rajagopalachari Street, AMCComplex Governorpet Krishna Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh- 520002

8. 6624876

17-11-2006 IS1417: 1999

Goldandgold alloys, jewellery/ artefacts- fineness and marking.

J. C. Brothers Jewellers 6-3-80 , Jainab Commercial Complex MainRoad, Amcerpet Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh

9. 6624977

17-11-2006 IS 1417: 1999 19-11-2009 MTD Operative 19-11-2009 MTD Operative

17-11-2006 15. 6625676 Bombay Gold Shopee D. No. 27-14-70, Dattatreya Complex, Rajagopalachari Street, Governorpet Krishna, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh-520002

17-11-2006 16. 6625373 Suraj Bhan Babulal &Co. Jewellers 59-29/ 12and 13 , Basheerbagh , Hyderabad , Andhra Pradesh- 500063

17. 6627680

22-11-2006 Panyam Cements and Mineral Industries Limited, Bugganapally, Kurnool, CementNagar, Andhra Pradesh -518206

18. 6627781 M/s . Shalini Steels

27-11-2006 Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 164, 164A, 165, 166 , Sri Venkateswara Industrial Co. Op . Industrial Estate, Miyapur, Bollaram , Medak, Andhra Pradesh - 502325

19. 6630063

30-11-2006 Sri Balaji Jewellers C.P. Reddy Complex Chowrastha Warangal , Hanmakonda, Andhra Pradesh -506002

30-11-2006 20. 6630164 Sri M. Bajranglal Sons Jewellers H. No. 5-9-279 Shop No. C-3 and 5, Mayur Kushal Shopping Complex, Gunfoundry , Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh - 500001

30-11-2006 21. 6630265 Sri Ram Jewellery 4-1-857, Abid Road, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh - 500001

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii) ] 5

8 IS 1417: 1999

19-11-2009 MTD Operative

Gold and gold alloys,jewellery/ artefacts - fineness andmarking

IS1417: 1999

19-11-2009 MTD Operative

Gold and gold alloys, jewellery/ artefacts - fineness andmarking

IS2112: 2003

MTD

19-11-2009

Operative Silver and silver alloys, jewellery/ artefacts - fineness andmarking

CED

IS 1489: Part 1 : 1991 23-11-2007

Operative

Portland pozzolana Cement Part 1 flyash based

IS 1786: 1985

26-11-2007 CED Operative

High strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement

IS 1417 : 1999

4-12-2009 MTD Operative

Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts - fineness andmarking

4-12-2009 MTD Operative

IS 1417: 1999 Goldandgold alloys, jewellery/ artefacts - fineness andmarking

4-12-2009 MTD Operative

IS 1417: 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts - fineness and marking 9867

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

8 1 2

11-12-2007 MED

IS12225: 1997

30-11-2006

Operative 22. 6631873

Centrifugal jet pump

Sri Lakshmi Ganpathi Engineering Works 2nd Floor , Sri Vijaya Lakshmi Housing Complex Chenchupet Guntur Tenali , Andhra Pradesh -522202

EID

11-12-2007

30-11-2006 IS12640 : Part 1: 2000

Operative 23. 6631772

Residual current operated circuit- breakers for household and similar uses , part 1 : circuit- breakers without integral over- current protection (rccbs)

Guts Electromech Limited Plot . No. 163C and 164E IDA, Phase-2 , CherlapallyRangareddi Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh - 50005 ]

दिसम्बर , 2006

वर्ष वैधता लाईसेंसधारी का नाम व पता भारतीय मानक शीर्षक भा मा संख्या विभाग स्थिति स्टेटर्स

क्रम लाईसेंस संख्या

संख्या

स्वीकृत करने की तिथि वर्ष/माह

9 2

04-12-2006

1. 6630871

1417 99 एमटीडी परिचालित 05-12-2009

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र

7. 6633271 15-12-2006

[PART II -SEC. 3 (ii)] 5

9 1417 99 एमटीडी परिचालित 14-12-2009

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र

धातुएं , आभूषण/

धनलक्ष्मी ज्वेल्लर्स शाप नं. 179/3 , गणफोंडरी, हैदराबाद डि. आन्ध्रा प्रदेश -50000

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

एवं मुहरांकन

8. 6633473 15-12-2006

651 : 1992 सोइडी परिचालित 17-12-2009

लवन कांताभ

स्टोनवेयर पाइप और

फिटिंग विशिष्ट

सुख सागर सिरामिक्स प्रा. लिमिटेड सर्वे नं. 596 , 593 , लालगडी, मालक्पेट , शमीरपेटमंडल , रंगारेडी , आन्ध्रा प्रदेश -500078 9. 6636782 18-12-2006

14220 94 एफएडी परिचालित 26-12-2007

खुले कुएं लिए

निमज्जय पम्पसेट

विशिष्ट

सुधा इन्डस्ट्रीज नं. 17 , 18 , इन्डस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट, सुलतानाबाद , गुंटूर, तेनाली , आन्ध्रा प्रदेश -522202 10. 6639283 21-12-2006 सावूल्वेर इन्डस्ट्रीज प्लाट नं 8 , 9 , 10 एवं 11 , फेज II , आइ डी ए चेरलापली , रंगारेडी , हैदराबाद, आन्ध्रा प्रदेश-500051 11. 6636984 22-12-2006

694 1990 इटीडी परिचालित 07-01-2008

1100 वॉल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए पी वी सी रोधन केबल ( दो संशोधन सहित )

651 : 1992 सौइडी परिचालित 27-12-2007

लवण कांचाभ

स्टोनवेयर पाइप और

फिटिंग विशिष्ट

वेकट साईं लक्ष्मी सिरामीक्स सर्वे नं. 479 , इन्दाराम , आन्ध्रा प्रदेश-504216 12. 6637077 22-12-2006 सुमागली ज्वेल्लर्स 4-27, बाजार स्ट्रीट , चित्तरू , पत्तरू,

आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

141799 एमटीडी परिचालित 27-12-2007

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र

धातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

एवं मुहरांकन

13. 6637178 22-12-2006

1417 99 एमटीडी परिचालित 27-12-2007

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र

धातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

एवं मुहरांकन

जेय राजेन्द्र ज्वेल प्लेस 2-22-278/8 , शाप नं 4 एवं 5 , लक्ष्मी कमर्शल काम्प्लेक्स, ओपीपी के पी एच बी कालोनी , बम्बई हाइवे , कुकटपल्ली, हैद्राबाद , आन्ध्रा प्रदेश -500072 14. 6631974 22-12-2006

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र

1417 99 एमटीडी परिचालित 26-12-2007

धातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

एवं मुहरांकन

रीधी सीधी ज्वेल्लर्स 4-32-189/भाग मेन मार्केट रोड , शापूर, कूतूबूलापूर मंडल , रंगारेडी, आन्ध्र प्रदेश -500055 15. 6636681 22-12-2006

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र

1417 99 एमटीडी परिचालित 26-12-2007

धातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

एवं मुहरांकन

शारद गोल्ड एवं डाइमेन्ड्स प्रा. लि. , 16-11-741/सी , कालानीकेतन बिल्डिंग , ग्राउन्ड फलोर ,

दिलसुखनगर, हैदराबाद , आ. प्र.

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

9869

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22, 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

16. 6636883 22-12-2006 भोरूगु ब्रास ज्वेल्लर्स 5

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र

141799 एमटीडी परिचालित 26-12-2007

धातुएं, आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी शुद्धता

1-1-92, कलानिकेतन वेडीग माल , आर. पी. रोड , सिकिद्राबाद , आ. प्र.

Date :01-08-2007

एवं मुहरांकन

December 2006

GOL Date S.No. CML No. Licensee Name and Address

4 1. 6630871

04-12-2006 Tirupati Jewellers

5-8-582 , Abid Road, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh- 500001

14-12-2006 2. 6631974 Sri Chitranjali Gems & Jewels 12-5-1 / 1 , Jaya Towers , Opp. Sanghi Vidyanikethan Tarnaka , Hyderabad, Secunderabad Andhra Pradesh -500017

14-12-2006 3. 6632370 Nataraj Jewellery Mart D. No. 7-3-9 (4) , Ganganammapet,. Guntur, Tenali Andhra Pradesh -522202

4. 6632471

14-12-2006 Jitu Jewellers , 8-1-2 , Bazaar Street Chittor, Tirupati Andhra Pradesh -517501

5. 6634374

14-12-2006 M/ s Sunder Ispat Limited , Survey No. 2301/246 , Gaganpahad, Rajendarnagar Mandal, Bangalore Highway , Rangareddi , Gaganpahad, Andhra Pradesh

6. 6633170

15-12-2006 Sri Sarada Jewellery Mart, D. No. 6-1-271 , MainRoad , Guntur, Narsaraopeta, Andhra Pradesh -522601

7. 6633271

15-12-2006 Dhanlaxmi Jewellers , Shop No. 179/2 , Gunfoundry, Hyderabad , Andhra Pradesh - 500001

IS No & Product

Division Status Validity

8 05-12-2009 MTD Operative IS 1417 : 1999 Gold andgold alloys, jewellery/ artefacts - fineness andmarking

13-12-2009 MTD Operative IS 1417: 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts - fineness. andmarking

14-12-2009 MTD Operative

IS 1417: 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts -fineness and marking

14-12-2009 MTD Operative

IS1417: 1999 Gold and gold alloys,jewellery/ artefacts - fineness andmarking-

18-12-2007 CED Operative

IS 1786 : 1985 High strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete . reinforcement

14-12-2009 MTD Operative

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and gold alloys, jewellery/ artefacts - fineness andmarking

14-12-2009 MTD Operative

IS 1417 : 1999 Goldandgold alloys ,jewellery/ artefacts - fineness and marking 9870

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

1 2

15-12-2006 IS 651 : 1992

8. 6633473

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

8 6

CED

17-12-2007

Operative

Salt glazed stoneware

pipeand fittings

Sukh Sagar Ceramics (P) Limited, Sy. No. 596 , 593, Lalgadi Malakpet, Shameerpet Mandal , R. R. District-AP, Rangareddi , Lalgadi Malakpet, Andhra Pradesh -500078

18-12-2006 IS 14220 : 1994

9. 6636782

pumpsets Sudha Industries , No. 17 , 18 , Industrial Estate Sultanabad, Guntur , Tenali , Andhra Pradesh -522202

10. 6639283

21-12-2006 South Wire Industries Plot No. 8 , 9 , 10 and 11 , Phase- 11 (EXT.) , IDA Cherlapally, Rangareddi , Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh - 500051

11. 6636984

, 22-12-2006

Conerative 26-12-2007 MED

Openwell submersible

07-01-2008 FID Operative

IS694 : 1990 Pvc Insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100 V 27-12-2007 CED Operative

IS 651 : 1992

Saltglazed stoneware

pipeand fittings

Venkata Sai Laxmi Ceramic Sy.No. 479 , Indaram Village, Jaipur Mandal, Adilabad , Indaram Village, Andhra Pradesh - 504216

22-12-2006 12. 6637077 Sumangali Jewellers , 4-27 , Bazar Street, Chittor Puttur, Andhra Pradesh -517583

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and gold alloys, jewellery/ artefacts - fineness and marking

13. 6637178

22-12-2006 IS 1417-1999 Gold and goid alloys .jewellery artefacts- fineness and marking

Jai Rajendra Jewel Palace 2-22-278/8 Shop No. 4 and 5, Laxmi Commercial Complex , Opp . ΚΡΗΒ Colony , Bombay Highway, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh -500072

22-12-2006 14. 6636580

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and gold alloys, jewellery/ artefacts -fineness andmarking

Ridhi Sidhi Jewellers , 4-32-189/Part Main Market Road, Shapur Nagar , Qutabullapur Mandal , Rangareddi , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh - 500055

15. 6636681

22-12-2006 IS 1417: 1999

27-12-2009 MTD Operative 27-12-2009 MTD Operative 26-12-2009 MTD Operative 26-12-2009 MTD Operative

Goldandgold

alloys, jewellery/

artefacts - fineness

andmarking

Sharda Gold and Diamonds Pvt . Ltd, 16-11-741 / C Kalaniketan BuildingGround Floor, Dilsukhnagar Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh -500012 9871 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1, 1929

26-12-2009

IS 1417: 1999

MTD. Operative 16. 6636883

22-12-2006

Goldandgold

Boorugu Bros Jewellers, 1-1-92, Kalaniketan Wedding,Mall, R. P. Road, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh-500072

alloys, jewellery/

artefacts-fineness

andmarking

जनवरी , 2007

विभाग स्थिति स्टेटस

वर्ष संख्या

भारतीय मानक का

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता स्वीकृत करने की भा मा संख्या

क्रम संख्या

लाईसेंस संख्या

तिथि वर्ष/माह

शीर्षक

9 1 2

परिचालित

12269 : 1987

53 ग्रेड वी पी सी

सीईडी

02-01-2008

02-01-2007

1. 6638584 विनायका सिमेंट्स 1/14, 1/15 , आई डी ए इन्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट गाजुलमानडयम विलेज रेनिगुटा विलेज , चिततूरु डिस्ट्रिक्ट, तिरुपति, आन्ध्र प्रदेश

2-1-07

2-1-08

14543 :2004

एफ ए डी परिचालित 2. 6638483

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

हेल्तफुल पैकेज्ड ड्रिंकिंग वाटर सर्वे नं. 42/ए बशीराबाद विलेज कम्मरपल्ली मंडल निजामाबाद, आन्ध्रप्रदेश -503308

परिचालित 3 6639384

3-1-07

एम टी डी

7-1-08

2380:1992

पयेनीर टार स्टील मिल्स (प्र) लि. आइ डी ए, बोल्लाराम, जिन्नारम मंडल , मेदक, आन्ध्रप्रदेश

सामान्य संरचना इस्पात में पुनर्वेल्लन के लिए कार्बन ढलवा इस्पात बिलेट इंगट , बिलेट , ब्लूम और स्लैब

परिचालित

एम टी डी 4 6638786

4-1-10

5-1-07 1417:1999

रमणी शंकरय्या ज्वेलर्स 2-2-21 , वोल्ड बीट बाजार वरंगल , जनगाँव , आन्ध्रप्रदेश

स्वर्ण एव स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

संजय ज्वेलर्स

परिचालित

एम टी डी 5 6638887

1417:1999

4-1-10

5-1-07

स्वर्ण एव स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

11-1-767, सोजत कामप्लेक्स चिलकलगुंडा, सिंकद्राबाद , हैदराबाद , आन्ध्रप्रदेश -61

एम टी डी परिचालित

1417:1999

4-1-10

6 6638988

5-1-07

पी सत्यनारायण एंड सन्स ज्वेलर्स 22-6-83,84 , मचलीकमान , हैदराबाद , आन्ध्र प्रदेश -2

स्वर्ण एव स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

14543:2004

9-1-07

9-1-08 एफ ए डी परिचालित 7 6639889

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के

आलावा)

पद्याश्री इन्डस्ट्रीस डि नं. 24-1-4, आपोसिट डिस्ट्रिक्ट कोर्ट आसपताल रोड, वोंगोलु-523001 प्रकाशम डिस्ट्रक्ट, आन्ध्र प्रदेश

4935 G1/07-10 9872

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

4 2

10-1-07 8 6640672 श्री जी बी आर वाटर गायत्री वैन्स, संगम थियेटर के पास , दरबार रोड, चीराला प्रकाशम डिस्ट्रिक्ट, चीराला आन्ध्र प्रदेश

10-1-07 9 6641068 सत्य सूर्या चंद्रा वाटर प्राडक्टस , सर्वे नं. 1904/5 , न्यूचैतन्यानगर, राजीव कालोनी के बगल में अडकि-523201 प्रकाशम डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) ]

14543:2004

एफ ए डी परिचालित

10-1-08

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

11-1-08 एफ ए डी परिचालित

14543:2004 पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

17-1-08 एफ ए डी परिचालित

14151 ( भाग -1 :99 )

10 6643476

10-1-07 कुमार एन्टरप्राईजेस , ई -10 कडान इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट हैदराबाद-500077 रंगा रेड्डी जिला आन्ध्र प्रदेश-77

सिंचाई उपस्कर- स्प्रिंकलर पाइप भाग 2क्विक कपल्ड पालिइथिलिन पाइपस

14151 ( भाग-2:99 )

11 6643577

10-1-07

कुमार एन्टरप्रईजेस ई -10 कडान इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट हैदराबाद-500077 रंगा रेड्डी जिला आन्ध्र प्रदेश -77

11-1-07 12 6641472 मौटेइ ग्लेसियर इंडस्ट्रीस डी-2 , इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट मौला अलि हैदराबाद- 5000402-1-184 रंगा रेड्डी जिला आन्ध्र प्रदेश

13 6643173

11-1-07

साई राम आक्वा मिनरल्स 2-1-184 , साई नगर सूर्यापेट-508213 नलगोंडा डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश

11-1-07 14 6643779 श्री साई फूड्स एण्ड बेवेरेजस 1-9-390/1 , प्रगति इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट कुशाईगुडा, कीसरा मंडल रंगा रेड्डी जिला आन्ध्र प्रदेश

15 6648991

16-1-07

लक्ष्मी गणपती वाटर पम्प इंडस्ट्रीस सर्वे नं. 123/ 1,2 इंडस्ट्रियलएस्टेट, गुंटूरु तेनालि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश-522202

16 6645985

19-1-07

पत्रा ज्वेलर्स 8-3-949/4, 5 पंजागुटटा , अमीरपेट रोड ,पंजागुटटा आन्ध्र प्रदेश-500034

17-1-08 एफ ए डी परिचालित सिंचाई उपस्कर- स्प्रिंकलर पाइप भाग 2 क्विक कपल्ड पालिइथिलिन पाइपस

14543:2004

11-1-08 एफ ए डी परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543:2004

परिचालित

16-1-08 एफ ए डी पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

पैकेजबंद पेय जल

14543:2004

परिचालित

17-1-08 एफ ए डी (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

परिचालित

9079:2002

एफ ए डी

24-1-08

कृषि और जलपूर्ति के लिये साफ और ठंडे पानी के बिजली के मोनोसेट पम्प

परिचालित

एम टी डी

1417:1999

22-1-10

स्वर्ण एव स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन ['माग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

9873

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

4 17 6644175

19-1-07 श्री साई वेंकटेशवरा पैकेज्ड वाटर डि नं. 1-42/6 , कट्टेला अधिथि सेन्टर , गुरजाला मंडल गुंटूरु , आन्ध्र प्रदेश

18 6644276

19-1-07 जील मार्केटिंग हेच नं. 12-3-364/1, श्री सैलम रोड़, माचेरला- 522426 गुंटूरु , डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध प्रदेश

19-1-07 19 6645278 श्री गणपती इंडस्ट्रीस सर्वे नं.72/2, चीराला, प्रकाशम लक्ष्मीपुरम, रामकृष्णापुरम डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध, प्रदेश

23-1-07 6

14543:2004

18-1-08 एफ ए डी परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543:2004

21-1-08 एफ ए डी परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543 :2004

21-1-08 एफ ए डी परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543: 2004

20 6645379 जी वी एस इंडस्ट्रीस 19/1/9 , नरलासेट्टिवारिपालेम रागालयम के पास , बापटला गुंटूरु , डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश 21 6645783

23-1-07 गैंगा बेवेरेजस मुत्यालाचेरुवु, विलेज सर्वे नं.60; कदरी मंडल , अन्तपूर डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश

22 6645884

23-1--07 दनलक्ष्मी आक्वा प्राडक्टस हेच नं. 1-130 दिगुवा कोनकुंटलावारिपल्ले वेंपल्ले, मदनापल्लि मंडल चित्तूरू डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश

23-1-07 23 6649387 साई कृष्णा मिनरल्स डि नं. 8-157/1 बिशिप है स्कुल के पिछे पिडुगुराल्ला-522413 गुटूरु , डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश 24 6646078

23-1-07 निरंतरा बेवेरेजस हेच नं. 8-10-5 जे पी एन रोड़ वरंगल , आन्ध्र प्रदेश

23-1-07 25 6646886 सुरेश बाटलिंग कम्पनी प्लाट नं. 95 आई एल टी डी कालोनी कोत्तापेटा , चीराला, प्रकाशम डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश -523157

23-1-07 26 664708ⅰ) अअत्रपूर्णा इंडस्ट्रोस सर्वे नं. 350/1, आंडवाक रोड दारसी -52324 " प्रकाशम डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश -523247

एफ ए डी परिचालित

22-1-08

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543:2004

एफ ए डी परिचालित

22-1-08

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543:2004

एफ ए डी परिचालित

22-1-08

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543:2004

एफ ए डी परिचालित

28-1-08

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543:2004

एफ ए डी

22-1-08

परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा).

14543:2004

एफ ए डी परिचालित

22-1-08

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543:2004

22-1-03 एस ए डी परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के 9874

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

4 27 6647181

23-1-07 पी वेंकटेशवरलू अंड सन्स जी एन टी रोड़ टंगटूरू विलेज अंड मंडल प्रकाशम डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्रा प्रदेश -523274

28 6647585

23-1-07 श्री वासवि आक्या मिनरल्स सर्वे नं. 358/47 ए कुबादुपुरम , वीरम्मा कालोनि कोन्डमोंड्डु राजुपालेम मंडल गुंटुरू डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्रा प्रदेश-522412

29 6647586

23-1-07 श्री बालाजी आक्वा मिनरल्स डी नं. 9-163/1 वाटर टाँक स्ट्रीट पिडुगुराल्ला गुंटुरू डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश

23-1-07 30 6647989 गंगा ड्रिकिंग वाटर सर्वे नं. 163/2 सोमवरप्पाडु विलेज ताल्लुरू मंडल प्रकाशम डिस्ट्रिक्ट ईस्ट गंगावरम पोस्ट आन्ध्रा प्रदेश-523264

23-1-07 31 6648789 जे बी एन्टरप्राईसेस प्लाट नं. 381, वेकटरेडिडपालेम , काजा मंगलगिरि मंडल गुंटुरू डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

23-1-07 326648183 गुम्मडि इंडस्ट्रीस 42-1-191 (हेच) करुवडि डोंका कम्मपालेम , वोंगोलु-523001 प्रकाशम डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

23-1-07 33 6649993 पेरुमल्ला फूड अंड बेवेरेजस सर्वे नं. 32 तरलुपाडु रोड़ नरसिंहापुरम, मरकापूर-523316 प्रकाशम डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

Date: 01-08-2007

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] 5

14543:2004

22-1-08 एफ ए डी परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543:2004

23-1-08 एफ ए डी परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543:2004

23-1-08 एफ ए डी परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा)

14543:2004

परिचालित

23-1-08 एफ ए डी पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा)

14543:2004

एफ ए डी परिचालित

24-1-08

अलावा) पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के

14543 :2004

23-1-08 एफ ए डी परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543:2004

एफ ए डी परिचालित

23-1-08

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा

January 2007

Licensee Name and

S.No. CML No.

GOL Date Address

4 1 2

1. 6638584

2-1-07

Division Status Remarks Validity

ISNo& Product

9 2-1-08

CED Operative

IS 12269 : 1987

53Grade ordinary

portland cement

Vinayaka Cements 1/14, 1/15 , IDA, Industrial Estate Gajulamandyam Village , Renigunta Village , ChittorTirupati Andhra Pradesh 9875

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22, 2007/पौच1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खष्ठ 3( ii) ]

4 1

2-1-07 2. 6638483 Healthful Packaged DrinkingWater Sy.No. 42/A Basheerabad Village- 503308 Kammarpally Mandal Nizamabad District Nizamabad BasheerabadVillage Andhra Pradesh-503308

3. 6639384

3-1-07 Pioneer Tor Steel Mills (P) Ltd IDA, Bollaram Jinnaram Mandal Medak Andhra Pradesh

5-1-07 4. 6638786 Ramini Shankaraiah Jewellers 2-2-21 OldBeet Bazar Warangal Jangaon Andhra Pradesh

5-1-07 5. 6638387 Sanjay Jewellers 11-1-767Sojat ComplexChilkalguda Hyderabad Secunderabad Andhra Pradesh 500061

5-1-07 6. 6638988 P. Satyanarayan Sons Jewellers 22-6-83,84 Machlikaman Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh 500002

7. 6639889 Padmashree Industries 9-1-07 D. No.24-1-4,Opp. District Court Hospital RoadOngole-523001 Prakasam District PrakasamOngole Andhra Pradesh 523001

10-1-07 8. 6640672 Sri G.B.R. WaterPlant Gayatri WinesNear SangamTheatre DarbarRoadChirala Prakasam District Prakasam Chirala Andhra Pradesh

9 6

FAD

2-1-08

IS14543: 2004

Operative Packaged drinking water(other than packagednatural mineralwater)

MTD

IS2830: 1992 7-1-08

Operative Carbon steel cast billet ingots, billets, blooms and slabs for re- rolling intosteel forgeneral structural purposes

4-1-10

MTD

IS 1417: 1999

Operative Goldandgold alloys,jewellery/ artefacts-fineness andmarking

4-1-10

MTD

IS 1417:1999

Operative Goldandgold ' alloys, jewellery/ artefacts -fineness andmarking

MTD

4-1-10

IS1417:1999

Operative Goldandgold alloys, jewellery/ artefacts -fineness andmarking

9-1-08

FAD

IS14543:2004

Operative Packageddrinking water(other than packaged natural mineral water)

10-1-08 FAD

IS14543:2004

Operative Packageddrinking water(other than packaged natural mineralwater) 9876

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

4 1 2

10-1-07

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 6

9 5

FAD

IS 14543 : 2004

9. 6641068 Satya Surya Chandra Water Products

Sy. No. 1904/5 New ChitanyaNagar Beside Rajiv Colony Addanki -523201 Addanki -523201 Parkasam District Prakasam Addanki Andhra Pradesh- 523201

10-1-07 10. 6643476

11-1-08

Operative Packaged drinking water(other than packaged natural mineralwater)-

17-1-08

FAD

IS 14151:

Operative Part2:199 Irrigation equipment sprinkler pipes-part: polyethylene pipes

Kumar Enterprises E- 10 , Kattedan Indl Estate Rangareddi R.R. District Andhra Pradesh 500077

10-1-07 11. 6643577 Kumar Enterpreses E- 10, Kattedan Indl . Estate Rangareddi R.R. District Andhra Pradesh- 500077

IS 14151 :

17-1-08

FAD Operative Part1: 199

Irrigation equipment

sprinklerpipes -part

polyethylene pipes

quick coupled

11-1-07 12. 6641472

11-1-08

FAD

IS14543:2004

Operative Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineralwater)

Mountain Glacier InustriesD-2 Industrial Estate Moula Ali Hyderabad-500040 RangaReddy District Ranga Reddy Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh -500040

11-1-07 13. 6643173 Sai Ram Aqua Minerals 2-1-184, Sai Nagar Suryapet Nalgonda District Nalgonda Suryapet Andhra Pradesh- 508213

IS14543 : 2004 16-1-08 FAD Operative Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

11-1-07 14. 6643779 Sri Sai Food & Beverages#1-9-390/1 Pragathi Industrial Area Kushaiguda

IS14543 : 2004 17-1-08

FAD Operative Packaged drinking water(other than packaged natural mineralwater)

Keesara Mandal Ranga ReddlyDistrict Ranga Reddly Kushaiguda Andhra Pradesh

16-1-07 15. 6648991

Lakshmi Ganapathi Water Pump Industries S. No. 123/ 1,2, Industrial Estate Guntur Tenali Andhra Pradesh- 522202

19-1-07 16. 6645985

IS9079: 2002 24-1-08

MED

Under Stop Marking Electric monoset pumps for clear , water for agricultural and water supply purposes

IS1417:1999 22-1-10

MTD Operative Gold and gold alloys, jewellery/ artefacts- fineness and marking

Panna Jewellers 8-3-949/4& 5 Punjagutta Ameerpet Road Punjagutta Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh- 500034 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

19-1-07 17. 6644175 Sri Sai Venkateswara Packaged Water D.No.1-42/6, Kateela Adithi Centre , Gurazala, Gurazala Mandal ,Guntur District Guntur, Garazala Andhra Pradesh

19-1-07 18. 6644276 Zeal Marketing , H. No. 12-3-3-364/1, Sri Sailam Road Macherla-522,426 Guntur District, Guntur Macherla, Andhra Pradesh - 522426

19. 6645278

19-1-07 Sri Ganapathi Industries , S.No.72/2 , Lakshmipuram, Ramakrishnapuram, Chirala, Prakasam District, Prakasam Chirala Andhra Pradesh

20. 6645379

23-1-07 G.V.S. Industries # 19-1-9 Narlasetteevaripalem NearRamalayam Bapatla, Guntur District GunturBapatla Andhra Pradesh

23-1-07 21. 6645783 Ganga Beverages , Sy. No. 60 , Muthyalacheruvu Village, Kadiri Mandal, Anantapur District, Anantapur, Muthyalacheruvu , Andhra Pradesh

23-1-07 22. 6645834 Dhanalakshmi Aqua Products, H. No. 1130, Diguva Konakuntlavaripalle, Vempalle, Madanapalli Mandal Chittoor District, Chittoor, Madanapalli , Andhra Pradesh

23-1-2007 23. 6649337 Sai Krishna Minerals , D. No.8-157/ 1 Behind Biship High School, Piduguralla-522413 Guntur District Guntur, Piduguralla Andhra Pradesh -523157

9877

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

FAD

18-1-2008

IS 14543 : 2004

Operative Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineralwater)

IS 14543 :2004 21-1-2008 FAD Operative

Packaged drinking water(otherthan packagednatural mineralwater)

FAD

IS 14543 : 2004 21-1-2008

Operative

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineralwater)

IS14543 :2004 22-1-2008 FAD Operative

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineralwater)

IS14543:2004 22-1-2008 FAD Operative

Packageddrinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

IS14543:2004 22-1-2008 FAD Operative

Packaged drinking water (other than packagednatural mineralwater)

FAD

IS14543:2004 28-1-2008

Operative

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineralwater) 9878

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1,1929

1 2

23-01-2007

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] 6

9 FAD

IS 14543 : 2004

24. 6646078 Nirantara Beverages

H. No. 8-10-5

J.P.N. Road, Warangal Andhra Pradesh

23-1-2007 22-1 2008

Under Stop

marking

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineralwater)-

22-1-2008

IS 14543 : 2004

25. 6646886 Suresh Bottling Co. ,

PlotNo. 95 .

IL TD Colony, Kothapeta, Chirala-523 157 Prakasam District, Prakasam Chirala, Andhra Pradesh -523157

IS 14543:2004

23-1-2007 26. 6647080 Annapurna Industries

S. No.350/ 1 , Addanki Road, Darsi- 523 247 Prakasam District Prakasam,Darsi AndhraPradesh 523247

FAD Operative

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)-

FAD

22-1-2008

Operative

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineral water)

IS14543 :2004

27 6647181 P Venkateswarlu & Sons 23-1-2007 GNTRoad

22-1-2008 FAD Operative

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineral water)

Tangutur Village Mandal Prakasam District, Prakasam Tangutur Andhra Pradesh - 523274

Sri Vasavi Aqua Minerals 23-1-2007 28. 6647585

Sy.No.358/47A Khbhadhuypuram , Veeramma Colony Kondamodu-522412 Rajupalem Mandal Guntur,District Guntur Kondamodu, Andhra Pradesh- 522412

IS 14543 : 2004 23-1-2008 FAD Operative

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)-

FAD

23-1-2008

IS14543: 2004

Sri Balaji Aqua Minerals 23-1-2007 29. 6647686

D. No.9-163/ 1 Water Tank Street Piduguralla Guntur,District Guntur Piduguralla, Andhra Pradesh

23-1-2007

Operative

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)-

FAD

IS 14543 : 2004

30. 6647989 Ganga Drinking Water

Sy. No. 163/2 , Somavarappadu Village Talluru Mandal Prakasam East Gangavaram Post Andhri Pradesh- 523264

23-1-2008

Operative

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural. mineral water)- 9879

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Beverages S.No.32, Tarlupadu Road Narasimhapuram, Markapur-523316 Prakasam District, Prakasam Markapur Andhra Pradesh- 523316

फरवरी , 2007

विभाग

वर्षवैधता

भारतीय मानक शीर्षक

भा मा संख्या

क्रम लाईसेंस लाईसेंसधारी का नाम

स्थिति स्टेटर्स व पता

संख्या संख्या

स्वीकृत करने कीतिथि वर्ष/माह

परिचालित

01-02-2010 एम टी डी

1417 : 1999

01-02-2007

1. 6650978

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण /शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

शर्मा ज्वेलर्स 7-3-272, गंज रोड आपेः । टवुन पुलिस स्टेशन निजामाबाद आँध्र प्रदेश -503 001

परिचालित

01-02-2010 एम टी डी

1417 : 1999

01-02-2007

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं,

2.6651071

आभूषण/शिल्पकारी

शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

श्री रतनराज ज्वेलर्स शाप नं. 6 , लाल बंगला अमिपेट, हैदराबाद आँध्र प्रदेश -500 016

01-02-2010

परिचालित

एम टी डी

1417 : 1999

01-02-2007

3. 6651172

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

अन्नम रतनथ्या एंड संस 1-3-53, जनरल बाजार हैदराबाद सिकंदराबाद आँध्र प्रदेश-500 003

परिचालित

एम टी डी

01-02-2010

1417: 1999

01-02-2007

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं,

4. 6651273

आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मंगत्ताई जेम्स 5-9-29/3 बशीरबाग , हैदराबाद आँध्र प्रदेश-500 029

4935 G1/07-11 9880

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

9 1

02-02-2007 14543: 2004

01-02-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित 5. 6651778

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

कूल किंग इंडस्ट्रिस डोर नं. 8-2-19 , कोत्तापेटा कावेरी होटल के पीछे लायरपेटा, ओंगोल आँध्र प्रदेश-523 001

01-02-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित 6. 6651879

02-02-2007 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

श्राइन बीवेरजेस डोर नं. 40-5/6-10, आपे:मइक्रोवेव टवर एम जी रोड , लब्बीपेट विजयवाडा-520 010 कृष्ण जिला, कृष्ण विजयवाडा, आंध्र प्रदेश

7. 6652780

06-02-2008 सीईडी परिचालित

4984: 1995

05-02-2007

पानी की आपूर्ति के लिए उच्च धनत्व वाले पॉलिएथिलीन पाइप

जैन इरिगेषण सिस्टमस 317- ए, 6-3-650 , तीसरी मंजील महेशवरी चेम्बर्स सोमाजिगुड़ा हैदराबाद आँध्र प्रदेश -500 082

05-02-2007 4985 : 2000

06-02-2008 सीईडी परिचालित 8. 6652679

पेय जल की पूर्ति के लिए असुघद्रियत पी.वी.सी. पाइप

जैन इरिगेषण सिस्टमस सर्वे नं. 587 एंड 588 बिबिनगर मंडल नल्गोंडा कोंडामडुगुविलेज आँध्र प्रदेश -508 126

सीईडी 05-02-2007 14151

परिचालित 9. 6652982

06-02-2008

(भाग 2) : 1999

सिंचाई उपस्कर- स्प्रिंकलर पाइप भाग 2 क्विक कपल्ड पालिइ- थिलिन पाइपस

जैन इरिगेषण सिस्टमस सर्वे नं. 587 एंड 588 बिबिनगर मंडल नल्गोंडा कोंडामडुगुविलेज आँधा प्रदेश -508 126

सीईडी परिचालित 10. 6652578

05-02-2007 13488 : 1992

06-02-2008

सिंचाई उपस्कर - एमिटिंग पाइप सिस्टम

जैन इरिगेषण सिस्टमस सर्वे नं. 587 एंड 588 बिबिनगर मंडल नल्गोंडा कोंडामडुगुविलेज आँध्र प्रदेश -500 126

सी ई डी परिचालित 07-02-2007 14151

11. 6652881

06-02-2008

(भाग 1): 1999

सिंचाई उपस्कर-स्प्रिंकलर पाइप भाग । पालिइथिलिन पाइप साइजेस

जैन इरिगेषण सिस्टमस सर्वे नं. 587 एंड 588 बिबिनगर मंडल नलगोंडा कोंडामडुगुविलेज आँध्र प्रदेश-500 126

1786 : 1985

परिचालित

एस एम डी 12. 6654279

09-02-2007

08-02-2008

कंक्रीट प्रबलन के लिए उच्च सामर्थ्य विकसित इस्पात छड और तार

पयनीर टॉर स्टिल (प्रै. ) लिमिटेड आई डी ए, नाचारम रंगा रेड्डी हैदराबाद आँध्र प्रदेश

परिचालित

एस एम डी 13. 6654582

09-02-2007 1786 : 1985

11-02-2008

कंक्रीट प्रबलन के लिए उच्च सामर्थ्य विकसित इस्पात छड और तार

हरियाना स्टिल सेंटर 8-141 , आई डी ए, रंगा रेड्डी हैदराबाद आँध्र प्रदेश

4246: 2002

परिचालित

11-02-2008

12-02-2017

एम ईडी 14. 6654683

द्र पै गै के साथ प्रयुक्त घरेलु गैस चूल्हा

खेतान मेन्यूफैक्चरेर्स डोर नं. 19-1-915/10 भाग्यनगर कालोनी, बहादुरपुरा , हैदराबाद आँध्र प्रदेश -500 064 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

5 1

नंदी प्लास्टिसैजर्स एंड 13-02-2007 14151 15. 6658287

(भाग 1 ): 1999 पाइपस इंडस्ट्रिज प्लाट नं. 148 और 152 , न्यूइंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, उडमलपुरम ( वी) नंध्याल (एम ) -518 502 कर्नूल जिला ( आँध्र प्रदेश )

नंदी प्लास्टिसैजर्स एंड 13-02-2007 14151 16. 6658388

(भाग 2): 1999 पाइपस इंडस्ट्रिज प्लाट नं. 148 और 152 , न्यूइंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, उडमलपुरम (वी) नंध्याल (एम ) -518 502 कर्नूल जिला ( आँध्र प्रदेश )

17. 663482

13-02-2007 14543 : 2004 वारीयर मिनरल वाटेक डोर नं. 37-1-125 नियर मस्तान दर्गा ट्रंक रोडए, ऑगेल-523 001 आँध्र प्रदेश

14543: 2004 18. 6656384

14-02-2007

साई वेंकटा लक्षमी चेन्ना- केशवा इंडस्ट्रिस सर्वे नं. 1193/ए, ओंगोल प्रकासम, र्माकापूर आँध्र प्रदेश -523 316

14543 : 2004

14-02-2007

19. 6657487 सुजला एन्टरप्रईजेस

सर्वे नं. 419/2 , रामान्जनेया- पुरम कडापा आँध्र प्रदेश -516 002

वेंकटा श्रावणी मिनरल

14543: 2004 20. 6656485

14-02-2007

वाटर प्लांटे

खम्बालापाडु विलेज पोडिलि-523 240 प्रकासम जिला , प्रकासम आँध्र प्रदेश-523 240

14543: 2004 विकास हैजिनिक प्राडक्टस 15-02-2007

21. 6656586

नं. 13-1-17 , विनुकोंडा रोड नार्सारावपेट-522 062 आँध्र प्रदेश

15-02-2007 14543 : 2004 22. 6656788 बालाजी एकस्पोटर्स एंड

पेकेजड ड्रिंकिंग वाटर

20/10/38 , नियर गवर्नमेंट हस्पताल मेइन रोड कोव्बूर नेल्लोर जिला आँध्र प्रदेश -524 137

15-02-2007 14543: 2004 23. 6656990 कावेरी मिनरल वाटर

डोर नं. 2-116-9 ,

आपेः एच पी पेट्रोल पम्प नेल्लोर रोड प्रकासम जिला, प्रकासम पामुरू, आँध्र प्रदेश

9881 6

19-02-2008 सी ई डी परिचालित

सिंचाई उपस्कर- स्प्रिंकलर पाइप भाग । पालिइथिलिन पाइप साइजेस

परिचालित

सी ई डी

19-02-2008

सिंचाई उपस्कर- स्प्रिंकलर पाइप भाग 2 क्विक कपल्ड पालिइ- थिलिन पाइपस

26-02-2008

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज:- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

26-02-2008

परिचालित

एफ ए डी.

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

18-02-2008

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज़- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

18-02-2008

चिन्ह निषेध

एफ ए डी

मेंहैं

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

14-02-2008

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

14-02-2008

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

14-02-2008

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा) 9882

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/ PAUSA 1 , 1929

15-02-2007 14543 : 2004 24. 6657386 ज्वालामुखी इंडस्ट्रिस

सर्वे नं. 205/1 , 207/2

परनामिट्ट्टा

प्रतिभा कालेज के पीछे

संतनूतालापाडु मंडल प्रकासम जिला , प्रकासम

परनामिट्य

25. 6656687 श्रीराम ज्वेर्ल्स

15-02-2007 1417 : 1999 सी-6 एंड 7 , मयूर

कुशल काम्पेक्स

गनफऊन्ड्री

हैदराबाद

आँध्र प्रदेश

19-02-2007

एस पी एम वयरर्स

7098 26. 6658489

एंडकेबल

(भाग 1): 1988 ए-28/1/ 12 , आई डी ए

नाचारम , रंगा रेड्डी

हैदराबाद

आँध्र प्रदेश -500 076

19-02-2007 14543 : 2004 27. 6656889 श्रीलेखा इंडस्ट्रिस 6-552, आजाद नगर अनतपूरं, आँध्र प्रदेश

20-02-2007 14543 : 2004 28. 6658590 एम एम एस बीवेरेजेस डोर नं. 1-38 , सर्वे नं. 108 नियर गर्बनमेंट जूनियर कालेज मुलागुंटापाडु विलेज-523 101 सिंगरायाकोंडामंडल , प्रकासम- आँध्र प्रदेश-523 101

29. 6659289

20-02-2007 14543 : 2004 क्रिस्टल वाटर्स नं. 4/405 , बंगलोर बैपास रोड इरूवरम , चित्तूर

आँध्र प्रदेश -517 001

30. 6660678

20-02-2007 14543: 2004 मधुरा पेकेजड ड्रिंकिंग वाटर सर्वे नं. 618 , लिंगापूर विलेज

मेडचल मंडल

रंगा रेड्डी

आँध्र प्रदेश

20-02-2007 14543 : 2004 31. 6661276 सिरि इंडस्ट्रिस

प्लाट नं 18बी, 3-8-376/ए

मंसूराबाद , एल बी नगर

रंगा रेड्डी , हैदराबाद

आँध्र प्रदेश

32. 6660274 क्वालिटि मिनरलस एंड 20-02-2007 14543 : 2004 बीवेरेजेस , प्लाट नं. 2 ,

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 6

18-02-2008

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

पेकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

14-02-2010 एम टी डी परिचालित

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

19-02-2008

परिचालित

ईटी डी

क्रॉसलिंक्ड पॉलीथीन से रोधित पीवीसी के खोल चढ़ी केबल भाग 1 1100 वो. तक कार्यकारी वोल्टाके लिए

रद्द किया गया 18-02-2008 एफ ए डी

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

18-02-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

18-02-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

22-02-2008

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

22-02-2008

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

21-02-2008

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज-

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल

के अलावा)

न्यूबालाजी कालोनी ,

ए आई आर बैपास रोड

एम आर पल्ली

तिरूपती रूरल

चित्तूरजिला

चित्तूर , आंध्र प्रदेश 9883

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1 2

20-02-2010

परिचालित

एम टी डी 20-02-2007 1417 : 1999

33. 6658893

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

हरप्रित ज्वेलर्स 6-3-853, शाप नं. जी-11 ग्राऊंड फलोर , मेरिडियन प्लाजा , अभिरपेट हैदराबाद आँध्र प्रदेश -500 016

20-02-2010 एम टी डी परिचालित 20-02-2007 1417 : 1999

6658994

34.

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मूसद्दीलाल ज्वेलर्स 5-9-57/2, 3 एंड 4, बशीर बाग हैदराबाद आँध्र प्रदेश -500 063

20-02-2010

परिचालित

एम टी डी 35. 6659087

20-02-2007 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मिस्त्रीलाल 'स ज्वेलर्स 7-1-644, मार्केट स्ट्रिट पार्ट मार्केट , हैदराबाद सिकंदराबाद आँध्र प्रदेश -500 003

20-02-2010

परिचालित

1417: 1999

एमटी डी 36. 6659188

20-02-2007

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

श्री बालाजी ज्वेलरी मार्ट 8-1-12, बाजार स्ट्रिट चित्तूर, तिरूपती आँध्र प्रदेश -517 501

20-02-2010

1417: 1999

परिचालित '20-02-2007

एम टी डी 37. 6662076

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

पी जी ज्वेलर्स 40-421-31, भास्कर नगर नियर ओल्ड अध्थप्पास्वामि टेम्पल कर्नूल आँध्र प्रदेश -518 001

20-02-2010

परिचालित

एम टी डी

2112 : 2003

20-02-2007

38. 6658792

चांदी एवं चांदी मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

श्री बालाजी ज्वेलरी मार्ट 8-1-12 , बाजार स्ट्रिट चित्तूर, तिरूपती आँध्र प्रदेश -517 501

परिचालित

21-02-2008

14543 : 2004

एफ ए डी 21-02-2007

39. 6660577

पेकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

लक्ष्मी इंडस्ट्रिस 1-1/2, है स्कूल रोड गनापावरम पी ओ-522 519 नादेंडला मंडल गुंटूर जिला आँध्र प्रदेश -522 519

22-02-2008

परिचालित

एफ ए डी 40. 6661680

21-02-2007 14543: 2004 पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

श्री मण्खिठा वाटर इंडस्ट्रिस एच नं. 2-23 , यम्नापेट धटकेसर मंडल रंगा रेड्डी , हैदराबाद आंध्र प्रदेश

परिचालित

22-02-2008 एफ ए डी 21-02-2007 14543 : 2004

41. 6661781

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

हिमगिरी आखवा प्रोडक्टस सर्वे नं. 283 पेरिचेर्ला मेडिकोंडुरू मंडल गुंटूर जिला आँध्र प्रदेश

21-02-2008

परिचालित 21-02-2007

एफ ए डी

14543 : 2004

42. 6659592

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

स्वास्तिक मिनवेट सिस्टम्स प्लाट नं . 9 , डोर नं. 5-17 बंजारा कालनी कर्नूल-506 101 आँध्र प्रदेश

21-02-2008

परिचालित

14543 : 2004

एफ ए डी 21-02-2007

43. 6659895

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंदप्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

आर एम आर फूड एंड बीवेरेजेस 7/109- एफ , वी पीसी टवर्स एन जी ओ कालोनी कडापा-516 002 आँध्र प्रदेश 9884

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

1 2

14543: 2004

21-02-2007

44. 6659996

डोर नं. 5-22, भूपती पल्लीविलेज मर्कापूर मंडल प्रकासम जिला , प्रकासम आँध्र प्रदेश विजयश्री इंडस्ट्रिस

14543 : 2004

21-02-2007

45. 6660072 सुधेश आखवा टेख 7-205, राधावंद्रा नगर सत्ययानारायण्पुरम तिरूपती, आँध्र प्रदेश

14543 : 2004

21-02-2007

46. 6662884 श्री विजया इंडस्ट्रिस नं. 6-6-49ए, 6/1 अरूंडालपेट गुंदुर - 2- आँध्र प्रदेश

14543 : 2004

21-02-2007

47. 6664282 यू बी बीवेरेजेस सर्वे नं. 551/2 (डोर नं. 15-18) रामापुरम रोड चिराला, कोत्तापेटा वेटापालेम कमंडल, प्रकासम जिला , प्रकासम आँध्र प्रदेश

22-02-2007 14543 : 2004 48. 6662985 विप्रोस हैजिनिक वाटर सर्वे नं. 183/1 एन एच 5 के. बिट्रागुंटा-523 101 वथ्था सिंगरायाकोंडा जरुगुमल्ली मंडल प्रकासम जिला , प्रकासम आँध्र प्रदेश -523 101

49. 6660173

22-02-2007 14543 : 2004 श्विमणी पेकेजड ड्रिकिंग वाटर एच नं. 4-1 /डी 8 कुरवी रोड, मेहबूबाबाद आँध्र प्रदेश 506101

14543 : 2004

22-02-2007

50. 6660779 वी एस एस के इंडस्ट्रिस डोर नं. 13-1-53 दोवालापालेम ओगोल-523 001 प्रकासम आँध्र प्रदेश

22-02-2007 14543 : 2004 51. 6660880 श्री वेंकटेश्वरा हेल्त केर प्राडक्टस सर्वे नं . 586/1 कोटप्पा नगर विनुकोंडा--522 647

14543 : 2004

22-02-2007

52. 6661074 श्री साई गणेश इंडट्रिस रामुलु बोम्मारोउ अन्नापूर्ण नगर अमरावती रोड गुंटूर आँध्र प्रदेश

53. 6663179

22-02-2007 8034 : 2004 गंगोत्री सबमेसिबल पम्पस 10-43 , विनायक नगर बालानगर हैदराबाद आँध्र प्रदेश -500 042

23-02-2007 14543 : 2004 54. 6661175 श्री साई कृष्ण इंडस्ट्रिस सर्वे नं. 39/1 , के एस पल्ली रोड गिद्दालूर प्रकासम आँध्र प्रदेश -523 357

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] 6

21-02-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

21-02-2008

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

25-02-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

29-02-2008

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

25-02-2008

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

21-02-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

22-02-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

22-02-2008

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

22-02-2008

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

26-02-2008

सबर्मेसिबल पम्प सेटस

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

परिचालित

22-02-2008 एफ ए डी

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा) 9885

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

27-02-2008

परिचालित 23-02-2007 14543: 2004

एफ ए डी श्री अमर साई ड्रिकिंग

55. 6663684

पेकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

वाटर प्लान्ट डोर नं. 335/ए-271ए रेंटाचिंताला गुंटूर जिला , गुंटूर आँध्र प्रदेश

परिचालित

14543: 2004

26-02-2008

56. 6663280

23-02-2007

एफ ए डी

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज-- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

सानिया बीवेरेजेस 10-301, जेंडा स्ट्रिट गूटी-515401 अतंतपूर आँध्र प्रदेश-515401

06-03-2008

14543 : 2004

27-02-2007

परिचालित

एफ ए डी 57. 6668795

पेकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेज बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

लक्ष्मी गणपती इंडस्ट्रिस डोर नं. 9-8-156 अम्बेरकर नगर बेल्लमपल्ली आदिलाबाद आँध्र प्रदेश-504 251

06-03-2008 सी ई डी परिचालित 27-02-2007 12786: 1989

58. 6669090

सिंचाई उपस्कर-पालिइथिलिन पाइपस इरिगेषण लेटरलस केलिए

01-03-2008

59. 6664888

28-02-2007 14543 : 2004

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

श्री साई प्राडक्टस एंड बीवेरेजेस डोर नं. 5-6-98 /ए 3 विवेक नगर निर्माल आदिलाबाद आंध्र प्रदेश -504 106

05-03-2008

28-02-2007 14543 : 2004 पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज-

परिचालित

एफ ए डी 60. 6668492

बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल

केअलावा)

सरयू इंडस्ट्रिस सर्वे नं. 529, हन्मकोंडारोड पैडिपल्ली (वि) हन्मकोंडा, वरंगल , आँध्र प्रदेश

Dated: 01-08-2007

February 2007

Remarks

Status

Division

S. CML Licensee

IS No. & Product

Validity

GOL Date

1-3-53 General Bazar Hyderabad Secunderabad Andhra Pradesh -500 003

01-02-2007 IS 1417 : 1999

01-02-2010 MTD

4. 6651273 Mangatrai Gems

Operative 5-9-29/3

Gold and gold alloys ,

jewellery/artefacts-

fineness and marking

Liberty Cross Road Basheerbagh Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh- 500029

IS 14543 : 2004

01-02-2008 FAD

02-02-2007

5. 6651778 Cool King Industries

Operative

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineral water)

D. No. 8-2-19, Kothapeta, Beside Kaveri Hotel , Lawyerpet, Ongole-523 001 Prakasam Ongole Andhra Pradesh -523 001

IS 14543 : 2004

01-02-2008 FAD

02-02-2007

6. 6651879

Operative

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineralwater)

Shrine Beverages D.No. 40-5/6-10 Opp .Microwave Tower M.G. Road, Labbipet Vijayawada-520010 . Krishna District Krishna, Vijayawada Andhra Pradesh -520010

06-02-2008 CED Operative 7. 6652780 Jain Irrigation Systems 05-02-2007 IS 4984 : 1995

High density poly-

ethylene pipes for

potable water

supplies

Limited 317-A, 6-3-650, 3rd Floor Maheswari Chambers Somajiguda Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh - 500082

06-02-2008 CED Operative 8. 6652679 Jain Irrigation Systems 05-02-2007 IS 4985: 2000

Unplasticized PVC

pipesfor potable

water supplies

Limited S. Nos . 587 & 588 Bibi Nagar Mandal Nalgonda Kondamadugu Village Andhra Pradesh - 508 126

Operative 9. 6652982

05-02-2007 IS 14151 : Part 2 : 1999 06-02-2008 FAD

Irrigation equipment-

sprinkler pipes- Part:

quick coupled poly-

ethylene pipes

Jain Irrigation Systems Limited S. Nos . 587 & 588 Bibinagar Mandal Nalgonda Kondamadugu Village Andhra Pradesh - 508 126 9887 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

1 2

FAD

06-02-2008

Operative 10. 6652578

IS-13488 : 1992

05-02-2007

Emitting pipes system

Jain Irrigation Systems Limited S.Nos. 587 & 588 , Kondamadugu Village Bibinagar Mandal Nalgonda Kondamadugu Village Andhra Pradesh - 508 126

11. 6652881

07-02-2007 IS 14151: Part 1: 1999 06-02-2008 FAD Operative

Irrigation equipment - sprinkler pipes- part: polyethylene pipes

Jain Irrigation Systems Limited Sy. Nos. 587 & 588 , BibinagarMandal Nalgonda Kondamadugu Village Andhra Pradesh- 508 126

IS 1786 : 1985

08-02-2008 CED

09-02-2007

12. 6654279

Operative

High strength deformed

steel bars and wires for

concrete reinforcement

Pioneer Tor Steel Mills(P) Ltd., Jinnaram Mandal Medak Andhra Pradesh IDA, Bollaram

IS 1786 : 1985

09-02-2007

11-02-2008 CED

13. 6654582

Operative

High strength deformed

steel bars and wires for

concrete reinforcement

Hariyana Steel Centre 8-141 , IDA Nacharam Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh

11-02-2008 MED

14. 6654683

12-02-2007 IS4246 : 2002

Operative

Domestic gas stoves

for usewith liquefied

petroleum gases

Khetan Manufacturers D. No. 19-1-915/10 Bhagyanagar Colony Bahadurpura Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh -500 064

15. 6658287 Nandi

IS14151 : Part1 : 1999

19-02-2008 FAD

13-02-2007

Operative

Irrigation equipment-

sprinklerpipes-part:

polyethlene pipes

Plasticisers & Pipes Industries PlotNos . 148 & 152 New Industrial Estate Udumalpuram Village NandyalMandal Kurnool Nandyal Andhra Pradesh- 518 502

16. 6658388

13-02-2007 IS 14151 : Part 2 : 1999 19-02-2008 FAD Opérative

Irrigation equipment-

sprinkler pipes- part :

quick coupled

polyethlene pipes

Nandi Plasticisers & Pipes Industries PlotNos . 148 & 152 New Industrial Estate Udumalpuram Village Nandyal Mandal Kurnool Nandyal Andhra Pradesh- 518 502

4935G1/07-12 9888

Opp . H.P. Petrol Pump Nellore Road Pamuru Prakasam District Prakasam Pamuru Andhra Pradesh 9889

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22, 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1 2

24. 6657386

15-02-2007 6

9 18-02-2008 FAD

IS 14543 : 2004

Operative

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packagednatural

mineralwater)

Jwalamukhi Industries Sy. No. 205/1 , 207/2 , Pernamitta Behind Prathiba College Santhanuthalapadu Mandal Prakasam District Prakasam Pernamitta Andhra Pradesh

Sri Ram Jewellers

25. 6656687

IS 1417 : 1999

15-02-2007 14-02-2010 MTD Operative

Gold and gold alloys ,

jewellery/ artefacts-

fineness and markings

C-6 & 7, Mayur Kushal Complex Gunfoundry Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh- 500 001

26. 6658489

19-02-2007 IS 7098: Part 1 : 1988

SPM Wires & Cables A-28/1 / 12 , IDA-Nacharam Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh- 500 076

27. 6656889

19-02-2008 ETD Operative

Crosslinked polythelene insulated PVC sheathed cables:Part 1 for working voltage upto and includ- ing 1100v

18-02-2008 FAD Cancelled

IS 14543: 2004

19-02-2007 Shreelehka Industries 6-552, Ajad Nagar Anantapur Anantapur Andhra Pradesh

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineralwater)

20-02-2007 19-02-2008 FAD

IS 14543 : 2004

20-02-2007

IS 14543 : 2004

Plot No. 18B , 3-8-376/A

Mansoorabad

FAD

22-02-2008

Operative

Packaged drinking

water ( other than

packaged natural

mineralwater)

L.B. Nagar Hyderabad Ranga Reddy District Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh

20-02-2007 IS 14543 : 2004

32. 6660274 Kwality Minerals &

Plot No. 2, New Balaji

21-02-2008 FAD Operative

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineral water)

Beverages Colony AIR By Pass Road M.R. Palli Tirupati Rural Chittoor District Chittoor Tirupati Rural Andhra Pradesh

20-02-2007 Harpreet Jewellers

33. 6658893

6-3-853 , Shop No. G- 11

IS 1417 : 1999

MTD

20-02-2010

Operative

Gold and gold alloys ,

jewellery/artefacts

fineness and markings

Ground Floor, Meridian, Plaza Ameerpet Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh- 500 016

34. 6658994 Musaddilal & Sons 20-02-2007 5-9-57/2 , 3 & 4

IS 1417 : 1999

20-02-2010 MTD Operative

Gold and gold alloys ,

jewellery/artefacts

fineness and markings

BashirBagh Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh - 500 063

35. 6659087 M/ s . Misrilal's Jewellers 20-02-2007 IS 1417 : 1999

20-02-2010 MTD Operative

Gold and gold alloys ,

jewellery/ artefacts

fineness and markings

7-1-644 , Market Street PotMarket Hyderabad Secunderabad Andhra Pradesh - 500 003

20-02-2010 MTD

IS 1417: 1999

39. 6660577

9891

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

21-02-2008 FAD

IS 14543 : 2004

Operative

Packageddrinking water

(other than packaged

natural mineral water)

1-1/2, High School Road Ganapavaram P.O.-522519 Nadendla Mandal Guntur District GunturGanapavaram Andhra Pradesh -522 519

21-12-2007 40. 6661680 Sri Manikanta Water

IS 14543 : 2004

FAD

22-02-2008

Operative

Packageddrinking water

(other than packaged

natural mineral water)

Industries H. No. 2-23 YamanampetVillage Ghatkesar Mandal Ranga Reddy District Rangareddi Yamnampet Village Andhra Pradesh

21-02-2007 22-02-2008 FAD Operative

IS14543: 2004

41. 6661781

Packaged drinkingwater

(other than packaged

natural mineral water)

Himagiri Aqua Products Sy. No. 283 Perecherla Medikonduru Mandal Guntur District Guntur Perecherla Andhra Pradesh

FAD

21-02-2008

Operative

21-02-2007 45. 6660072 Sudesh Aqua Tech 7-205 Raghavendra

Operative

Packageddrinking water

(other than packaged

natural mineral water)

Nagar Satyanarayanapuram Tirupathi- 517501 Chittoor Tirupathi Andhra Pradesh - 517 501 9892

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

Wipros Hygienic Water Sy. No. 183/1 N.Η. 5 K. Bitragunta-523 101 , ViaSingarayakonda, Zarugumalli Mandal, Prakasam District, Prakasam, K.Bitragunta, Andhra Pradesh - 523 101

22-02-2007 IS 14543 : 2004

21-02-2008 FAD

49. 6660173 Shivamani Packaged

Operative

Packaged drinking water

(other than packaged

9893

9 6

MED

26-02-2008

Operative

IS 8034 : 2002

Submissible

pump. sets

mersible Pumps , 10-43, Vinayak Nagar, Balanagar, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh-500 042

22-02-2008 FAD

IS 14543 : 2004

23-02-2007 54. 6661175

Operative

Packaged drinking water

(other than packaged

natural mineral water)

Sri Sai Krishna Industries Sy. No. 39/1 , KS Palli Road, Giddaluru Prakasam , Andhra Pradesh - 523 357

23-02-2007 55. 6663684

IS 14543 : 2004 Packageddrinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

Sri Amar Sai Drinking Water Plant, D. No. 335/A-271 /A Rentachinthala, Guntur District Guntur, Rentachinthala, Andhra Pradesh

56. 6663280

23-02-2007 IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinkingwater (other than packaged ' natural mineral water)

Sania Beverages 10-301 , Janda Street, Gooty-515401 Ananthapur District , Ananthapur, Gooty, Andhra Pradesh - 515 401

27-02-2008 FAD Under Stop Marking

FAD

26-02-2008

Operative

FAD

06-03-2008

IS 14543 : 2004

27-02-2007 57. 6668795

Operative

Packageddrinking water

(other than packaged

natural mineral water)

Laxmi Ganapathi Industries D. No. 9-8-156, Amberkarnagar , Bellampally, Adilabad, Andhra Pradesh - 504 251

58. 6669090

27-02-2007 06-03-2008 FAD Operative

IS 12786: 1989

Irrigation equipment-

polyethylene pipe for

irrigation laterals

Jain Irrigation Systems Limited Sy. No. 587 & 588 Kondamadugu Village , Bibinagar Mandal , Nalgonda, Kondamadugu Village , Andhra Pradesh- 508 126

01-03-2008 FAD

IS 14543 : 2004

59, 6664888

28-02-2007

Operative

Packageddrinking water

(other than packaged

natural mineral water)

Sri Sai Proudcts & Beverages D. No. 5-6-98/ A3 , VivekNagar, NirmalAdilabad, Andhra Pradesh- 504 106

IS 14543 : 2004

28-02-2007 60. 6668492

05-03-2008 FAD Operative

Packageddrinking water

(other than packaged

natural mineral water)

Sarayu Industries Sy. No. 529, Paidipally(V) , Hanmakonda, Warangal , Andhra Pradesh Hanmakonda Road , 9894

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ]

मार्च , 2007

लाईसेंसधारी का नाम स्वीकृत करने भा मा संख्या भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक वर्ष संख्या विभाग

क्रम लाईसेंस संख्या संख्या व पता

स्थिति स्टेटस की तिथि, वर्ष/माह

1 2

9 1. 6668290

01-03-2007 14543: 2004

05-03-2008. एफ ए डी परिचालित

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा]

श्री साई पार्ता अंड कंपोनि 31/174, के एन रोड, पुत्तुरू, चित्तुरू डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश

01-03-2007 1417: 1999

एम टी डी परिचालित

01-03-2010

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

2. 6666185 मद्दिकेरा विश्वानादन ज्वेलर्स हेच नं. 4-4-39 , सुभाष एक्स रोड, मेदक सिद्दिपेट , आन्ध्र प्रदेश-502 103

3. 6666387

01-03-2007 1417: 1999

एम टी डी परिचालित

01-03-2010

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

महालक्ष्मिज्वेलर्स शाप नं : जी-3 श्रीगिरिकॉमप्लेक्स दिलशुकनगर बस स्टाप के सामने, हैदराबाद आन्ध्र प्रदेश-500660

4. 6666286

02-03-2007 1417 : 1999

एमटी डी परिचालित

01-03-2010

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

वी जी पी ज्वेलर्स 20-2-48 , पामुरू रोड प्रकाशमकंदुकूर आन्ध्र प्रदेश -523 105

02-03-2007 14543 : 2004

5. 6666084

परिचालित

01-03-2008 एफ ए डी

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

यूतिश इंडस्ट्रीस सर्वे नं. 361 बी उटूकोट्टाई से सत्यवेदा मेन रोड , सीतारामपेट विलेज अमबक्कम पंचायत सत्यवेदा मंडल , चित्तूरू डिस्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश -517588

14543: 2004

02-03-2007

एफ ए डी परिचालित 6. 6667591

04-03-2008

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

उमा महेश्वरी प्रोडकट्स डी नं. 593 बी, सत्तुलुरू विलेज नादेनला मंडल, गुंटूरू आन्ध प्रदेश

14543: 2004

02-03-2007

7. 6667692

04-03-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

आक्वा गोल्ड इंडस्ट्रीस शाप नं . 39 एंड 40, केशराजपल्लि, सिरड़ि साई कामप्लेक्सन्यूकलेक्टरेट के के पास नलगोंडा, आन्ध्र प्रदेश -508001

8. 6670075

02-03-2007 14543: 2004

04-03-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

साई राम मिनरल्स डी नं. 8-386 , साई नगर एस एन पुरम, चित्तूरू जीवकोना , आन्ध्र प्रदेश -517 501

14543: 2004

05-03-2007

07-03-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित 9. 6670176

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

चंदमामा वाटर प्रोडकट्स डी नं. 11-49/1, द्ववारकानगर के पास जूबिली हिल्स, चित्तुरू चंद्रगिरी , आन्ध्र प्रदेश-517 101 9895

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II--खण्ड 3( ii) ]

1 2

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

07-03-2008

14543 : 2004

05-03-2007

10. 6670378

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

विदाता मिनरल वाटर सर्वे नं. 79 , पुत्तुरू क्रास रोड एन एच 5 , गुंटूरू , ताडेपल्लि, आन्ध्रप्रदेश-522 501

एफ ए डी परिचालित

07-03-2008

14543 : 2004

11. 6670479

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

सुजकी फुडस एंड बेवेरेजस 05-03-2007 इंडस्ट्रीस सर्वे नं. 810/2 , नदिराजु तोटा गुंटूरू, बापटलामंडल आन्ध्र प्रदेश

एफ ए डी परिचालित

14-03-2008

14543: 2004

05-03-2007

12. 6674285

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

श्री दीरज रम्या इंडस्ट्रीस अवलोक गारडेन्सविद्वया विहार स्कूल के सामने मैल्लूरू रूरल मंडल नेल्लूरू डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश

एफ ए डी परिचालित

06-03-2008

14543: 2004

05-03-2007

13. 6669292

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंदप्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

आर एम इंडस्ट्रीस आर एम पयूरिफैड ड्रिंकिंग वाटर एल आइ जी64, न्यू हौसिंग बोर्ड कोलोनी सवरगाँव , आदिलाबाद , आन्ध्र प्रदेश

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

14543 : 2004

06-03-2008

05-03-2007

14. 6668896

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

बालाजी आक्वा प्रडक्टस अय्यप्पा मंदिर के सामने आर एस नं. 512/2 , वेलवदम मैलवरम मंडल कृष्णा, आन्ध्रप्रदेश -521 230

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

11-03-2008

14543 : 2004

05-03-2007

15. 6671582

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेज- बंदप्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

सहारा आक्वा प्रडक्टस हेच नं. 4/2-20-6-5 इंदिरानगर एक्सटेन्शन मदनापल्लि, चित्तूरू आन्ध्र प्रदेश

परिचालित

14543 : 2004

एफ ए डी

06-03-2008

05-03-2007

16. 6668593

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

वरून वाटर इंडस्ट्रीस प्लाट नं. 26 , कुमारी आईस कंपोनिके सामने सर्वे नं. 6026 मुत्यालाचेरूवु विलेज कदरी मंडल, अंतपूर डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश

3017 : 1985

07-03-2007

तरमोस्टाटस फर यूस वित्त

17. 6678596

20-03-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित इलेक्टिक वाटर हीटर्स

बास्करी इलेक्ट्रिकल सिस्टम्स (प्र) लिमिटेड प्लाट नं. डी98/बी, फेस 1 आइ डी ए, जीड़िमेटला आन्ध्र प्रदेश

एफ ए डी परिचालित

08-03-2008

1008: 2004

07-03-2007

18. 6668694

हाई बाइल्ड सुगर

कनफेक्शनरी

श्री सुधावल्लि फुड प्रोडक्ट्स सर्वे नं. 492 , इन्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट मिदुकुर रोड कोत्तपल्लि पंचायत , कड़पा प्रोदुटूरू आन्ध्रप्रदेश -516 362

एफ ए डी परिचालित

07-03-2008

08-03-2007 14543: 2004

19. 6669999

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

के जे इंडस्ट्रीस आर एस नं. 176 , प्रकाश इंजनियरिंग वर्क्स के सामने , एनिकिपाडु विलेज विजयावाडा रूरल , कृष्णा डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश-521 108

4935 G/07-13 9896

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

14543: 2004

20. 6670984

08-03-2007 ट्रिनिटी बेबेरेजस ( प्रा ) लिमिटेड 6-25, सर्वे नं. 202 पाटि गणपूर, पटानचेरू मेदक आन्ध्र प्रदेश-502 300

14543: 2004

09-03-2007 21. 6671481 श्री साई फुड एंड बेवेरेजस 6-130, पेटागड्डा, नंदलूरू कड़पा आन्ध्र प्रदेश -516 150

09-03-2007 14543: 2004

22. 6671885 विजय इंडस्ट्रीस फेस 3 , शेड नं.4 , जे ए नगर विजयवाडा-520 007 कृष्णाडिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश

09-03-2007 14543: 2004

23.6671986 श्री इन्दुशेकरा बेवेरेजस 14-12/3 , हसनपर्ति सर्वे नं. 179 , वरंगल आन्ध्र प्रदेश

09-03-2007 14543: 2004

24. 6672281 कस्तुरि आक्वा इंडस्ट्रीस आर एस नं.423/ 1 सुल्तानगरम , मचिलिपटनम कृष्णा डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश -521 001

09-03-2007 14543: 2004

25. 6673081 शिवगंगा पयूरिफैड ड्रिकिंग वाटर , 7/84 एंड 85 जयानगर कालोनीचिनना चौक , कड़पा आन्ध्र प्रदेश

09-03-2007 26.6671077

1417: 1999 आर एस ज्वेलर्स 9-36, ललितानगर भेंगा सिनिमा के बगल में दिलशुकनगर , हैदराबाद आन्ध्र प्रदेश-500 660

09-03-2007 1417 : 1999 27. 6671178 आर एस ज्वेलर्स 1-1-76 से 82 यशोदा अस्पताल के बगल में आर पी रोड, सिकिंद्राबाद आन्ध्र प्रदेश

28. 6671279

09-03-2007 1417: 1999 रूबी ज्वेलर्स 11-5-76 से 7 एंड 11-5-603 रेड हिल्स, नामपल्लि हैदराबाद-500 028 आन्ध्र प्रदेश

09-03-2007 1417: 1999 29. 6671380 वेंकटरमणा ज्वेलर्स 20-12-143 , संता बाजार वेजिटेबल मार्केट के पास प्रकाशम, चीराला आन्ध्र प्रदेश-523 155

13-03-2007 14543: 2004

30. 6672786 श्री प्रयास इंडस्ट्रीस एच नं.2-239 नलंदा डिग्री कालेज के पास एन एच नं. 7 दसनापुर विलेज मावला, ग्राम पंचायत आदिलाबाद , आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 6

07-03-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

11-03-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

12-03-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

12-03-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

12-03-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14-03-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

एमटी डी परिचालित

08-03-2010

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

परिचालित

एमटी डी

08-03-2010

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

एमटी डी परिचालित

08-03-2010

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

एम टी डी परिचालित

08-03-2010

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण /शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

एफ ए डी परिचालित

13-03-2008

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा) 9897

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

14543: 2004

एफ ए डी परिचालित 14-03-2007

13-03-2008

31. 6672988

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

श्री वेंकटेश्वरा इंडस्ट्रीस सर्वे नं. 307/आई जी गुडिपल्लिपाडुविलेज अल्लिपुरम पोस्ट नेल्लूरू रूरल मेन नेल्लूरू डि आन्ध्र प्रदेश

एम टी डी परिचालित

14-03-2010

32. 6673485

14-03-2007 1417: 1999 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

जनताज्वेलर्स 14/16, मंडपाला स्ट्रीट, नेल्लूरू, आन्ध्र प्रदेश-524 001

1417: 1999

14-03-2007

14-03-2010 एम टी डी परिचालित 33. 6673586

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

श्री बालाजी ज्वेलर्स 4-1-968/1 , आबिडस रोड संतोश स्वपना थियेटर के सामने, हैदराबाद आन्ध्र प्रदेश- 500'001

परिचालित

एम टी डी

14-03-2010

34. 6673687

14-03-2007 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

शांतिलाल एंड सन्स ज्वेलर्स 12/1267 , चित्रा बाजार , नेल्लूरू, आन्ध्र प्रदेश-524 001

14-03-2007 1417: 1999

परिचालित 35. 6673788

एम टी डी

14-03-2010

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

बाँबे ज्वेलर्स शाप नं.3 , जय हिंद कॉमप्लेक्स राजागोपालचारिस्ट्रीट कृष्णा, विजयवाड़ा आन्ध्र प्रदेश-520 002

1417 : 1999

परिचालित 14-03-2007

14-03-2010 एम टी डी 36: 6671889

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

श्री महावीर ज्वेलरी हाउस 32बाजार स्ट्रीट, चितुरू, तिरूपति आन्धा प्रदेश-517 501

परिचालित

14-03-2010 एम टी डी 14-03-2007 1417 : 1999

37. 6673990

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मुसद्दिलाल सन्स 125 एम जी रोड पार्कलेन , हैदराबाद आन्ध्र प्रदेश-500 003

परिचालित

एम टी डी

14-03-2010

38. 6674083

बाँबे ज्वेलस पैराडाइस 27-23-112 , राजगोपालाचारिस्ट्रीट ए एम सी कॉमप्लेक्स क्रे सामने , कृष्णा, विजयवाड़ा आन्ध्र प्रदेश -520 002

एम टी डी परिचालित

14-03-2010

हर्ष ज्वेलर्स

14-03-2007 1417: 1999

39.6674184

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

8-3-944/12/ 1 एंड 2 अहमद कमर्शल कॉमप्लेक्स अमीरपेट, हैदराबाद आन्ध्र प्रदेश -500 016

2830: 1992

परिचालित 14-03-2007

13-03-2008 एम टी डी 40. 6672887 तिरूपति उद्योग लिमिटेड

कार्बन इस्पात के बिलेट (मानक किस्म)

8-2/629/ 1 /ए/ 3 , दूसरी मंजिल, विष्णु बवन रोड नं. 12 , बंजारा , हिल्स हैद्राबाद , आन्ध्र प्रदेश-500034 9898

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

14-03-2007 12933:

41. 6674386

(भाग-1)

2000 श्री सुंदरम सोलार सोल्यूशन्स 8-2-70 , हर्षवर्दन कालोनी, वोल्ड बोइनपल्लि, हैदराबाद , आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

15-03-2007 694: 1990 42. 6678697 चल्ला केबुल्स ( प्रा. ) लि. , 5-246/9/2 , हेच पी सी रोड़ मूसापेट, रंगारेड्डि , हैदराबाद , आन्ध्रा प्रदेश -500 018

15-03-2007 43. 6675186

14543: 2004 वोम साई बेबेरेजस डी नं. 74-24-30/2 एडुपुगल्लु -521151 ककिपाडुमंडल , कृष्णा एडुपुगल्लु, आन्ध्रा प्रदेश -520 002

15-03-2007 14543: 2004 44. 6676087 टी टी के इंडस्ट्रीस प्लाट नं. 10-144/डी येर्रमरेड्डिपालेम रोड , इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट के बगल में रेनिगुंटा रोड , चित्तुरू , तिरूपति-517 507 आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

45. 6676087

16-03-2007 14543: 2004 श्री साई बालाजी आक्वा इंडस्ट्रीस , सेन्ट्रल स्कूल के सामने नल्लापाडु, गुंटूरू, आन्ध्रा प्रदेश-522 005

20-03-2007 46. 6684490

14543: 2004 सिवानि ट्रेडर्स सर्वे नं. 259/2 , वोगुरू कंदुकूरू मंडल , प्रकाशम डिस्ट्रिकट, आन्ध्रा प्रदेश -523 105

20-03-2007 14543: 2004 47. 6679598 तिरूमला इंडस्ट्रीस हेच नं. 8-52/4 , सर्वे नं. 160/ए , कोटि लिंगाला मंदिर केपास , रेड्डिपालेम , गोर्राकुंटा, वरंगल , आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

14543: 2004 48. 6685896

20-03-2007 आक्वा चाईस्ड पैकेज़ड ड्रिंकिंग वाटर , 5-33ए, माद्वनगर राजीवनगर पंचायत , तिरूपति-517 502, चित्तुरू डिस्ट्रिक्ट, आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

20-03-2007 14543: 2004 49. 6686696 श्री विजयलक्षमि आक्वा प्रोडक्टस , डी नं. 8/62 , नारायणपुरम दाचेपल्लि, गुंटूरूडिस्ट्रिक्ट, आन्ध्रप्रदेश -522414

21-03-2007 14255: 1995 50. 6690687 पवन पावर एंड टेलिकॉम लि. प्लाट नं. 141/1 , आई डी ए बोल्लारम नरसापुर , तालुख, मेडक (एपी) -502 325

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 6

14-03-2008 एम ई डी परिचालित सौर सपाट पट्रिका संग्राहक (भाग-1 ) सोलार प्लेट कलेक्टर

पी वी सी रोधित केबल

ई टी डी परिचालित

20-03-2008

15-03-2008 एफ ए डी चिन्ह निषेध में है पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

एफ ए डी

15-03-2008

चिन्ह निषेध मेंहै पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

एफ ए डी परिचालित

20-03-2008

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

27-03-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

22-01-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

28-03-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

एफ ए डी परिचालित

29-03-2008

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

ई टी डी परिचालित

04-04-2008

एरियल बन्चड केबल फार वर्किंग वोल्टजस 1100 वोल्ट तक और 1100 वोल्ट के साथ 9899

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

5 1 2

1417: 1999

51. 6681787

23-03-2007 चंदना ब्रदर्स टेक्स्टाइल्स एंड ज्वेलर्स (प्रा ) लिमिटेड डोर नं. 1-1-88 से 91 आर पी रोड हेड पोस्ट आफिस के सामने, सिकिंद्राबांद आन्ध्र प्रदेश -500 003

23-03-2007 1417: 1999

52. 6671481 सीता ज्वेलर्स 5-38 , तारानगर लिंगमपल्लि , बी हेच ई एल के पास रंगारेडि , हैदराबाद, आन्ध्रप्रदेश -500 050,

1417: 1999

23-03-2007 53. 6681989 कट्टाज्वेलर्स 8-3-322, मेन बाजार अनंतापूर, हिन्दूपुर आन्ध्रा प्रदेश -515 201

14543: 2004

23-03-2007 54. 6687799 श्री साई फूड़ एंड आक्या प्रडक्टस ड़ी नं 274 , पेरेचेरला मदिकोंडूरू चेरूवु गुंटूरू डिस्ट्रिक्ट, आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

14543 : 2004

55. 6688397

23-03-2007 श्री साई बेवेरेजस 5-45/1 , पर्वतापूर विलेज गटकेसर मंडल , रंगारेड्डि , आन्ध्र प्रदेश

14543: 2004

23-01-2007 56. 6685997 आर के बेवेरेजस प्लाट नं. 52 एंड 54 गरूडाद्रि नगर, नंदयाल रोड कर्नुल, आन्ध्रप्रदेश-518 002

14543: 2004

57. 6679699

23-03-2007 हेल्थ बेवेरेजस ड़ीनं. 4-30-33/6 , ई टी नगर ईतानगर, तेनालि, गुंटूरू डि. आन्ध्र प्रदेश-522 201

23-03-2007 14543: 2004

58. 6080078 एस आर एस मिनरल प्राडक्टस 9-68 , ी बी रोड़ , गुंतकलअनंतापुर, आन्ध्र प्रदेश -515 801

59. 6681282

23-03-2007 14543: 2004

श्री बारगवि बेवेरेजस इड़स्ट्रीस हेच नं. ई डब्लू एस हेच-259, फेस 2 , मौला-अली हाउसिंग बोर्ड रंगारेड्डि डिस्ट्रिक्ट हैदराबाद-500 040 आन्ध्र प्रदेश

23-03-2007 14543: 2004

60. 6681383 ए आर इंडस्ट्रीस प्लाट नं. 10 , ब्लाक नं. 32 , ओटोनगर , हयेत नगर मंडल , रंगारेड्डिडिस्ट्रिक्ट , हैदराबाद -500 070 आन्ध्र प्रदेश

14543: 2004

23-03-2007 61. 6681484 टंकसाला आक्वा मिनरल्स 30-20-4, ऐलूरू रोड , एस इ आर सेन्टर के पास , एन्केपाडु, विजय वाडा रूरल मंडल , कृष्णाडिसट्रिक्ट, आन्ध्र प्रदेश -521 108 .

परिचालित

25-03-2010 एम टी डी स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

25-03-2010 एम टी डी परिचालित स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

02-04-2008

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

02-04-2008

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

एफ ए डी परिचालित

02-04-2008

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

22-03-2008

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

एफ ए डी परिचालित

22-03-2008

पैकेजबंद पेय जल(पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

चिन्ह निषेध

25-03-2008 एफ ए डी

में है पैकेजबंद पेय जल(पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

25-03-2008

पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा )

परिचालित

25-03-2008 एफ ए डी पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा) 9900

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

6 2

14543: 2004

23-03-2007

62.6681585

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) एम एस एस बेवेरेजस नं. 25-28, गोल्लागुडा, सुबाश नगर, तिरूमलगिरि रंगारेड्डि, सिकिंद्राबाद आन्ध्र प्रदेश -500 015

14543: 2004 63. 6685391

23-03-2007

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा) कृष्णा काव्या हैजेनिक प्राडक्टस सर्वे नं. 773 , रेड्डि पाल्ले अटलूरू मंडल, कड़पा डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश

14543: 2004

23-03-2007

64. 6685492

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा) एस एल वी एन्टरप्राईसेस 2-72, अन्नोजीगुड़ा गटकेसर मंडल रंगारेड्डि आन्ध्र प्रदेश

23-03-2007 14543: 2004 65. 6682183

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा) साई किशोर प्यूरिफैयर 4-585 , एस एस आर नगर पोडिलिरोड़, दारसी प्रकाशमडिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश

23-03-2007 14543: 2004 66. 6682284

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा) नयूगंगा पैकेज सर्वेनं. 871 , पोटलादूर्ति ब्रिडज के पास पोटलादूर्ति विलेज एर्रागुंटला मंडल, कड़पा ड़ि आन्ध्र प्रदेश

27-03-2007 1786: 1985 67. 6683791

कंक्रीट पलन के लिए उच्च सामर्थ्य विकास इस्पात छड़ औरतार देवाश्री इस्पात ( प्रा. ) लि. सर्वे नं. 460 , एलिकट्टा विलेज शादनगर तालुक, महबूबनगर, आन्ध्र प्रदेश

68. 6686090

28-03-2007 1417: 1999 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन ललिता ज्वेलर्स शाप नं. 25 , मुनिसिपल कॉमप्लेक्स सुबाश रोड , क्लाक टावर के पास, अनंतपूर, आन्ध्र प्रदेश -515 001

28-03-2007 1417: 1999 69. 6686191

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन एस वी ज्वेलर्स डी नं. 11-49-348 , शिवालयमस्ट्रीट, कृष्णा विजयवाडा, आन्ध्र प्रदेश -520 001

28-03-2007 1417: 1999 70. 6685795

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन विनायका ज्वेलर्स 4-1-293, पोस्ट आफिस रोड करीमनगर , आन्ध्र प्रदेश -505 001

11673: 1992 71. 6685593

28-03-2007

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 7

एफ ए डी परिचालित 25-03-2008

एफ ए डी परिचालित 28-03-2008

एफ ए डी परिचालित 25-03-2008

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

26-03-2008

एफ ए डी परिचालित 26-03-2008

एम टी डी परिचालित 28-03-2010

परिचालित 28-03-2010 एम टी डी

28-03-2008 सी हेच डी परिचालित

सोडियम हैपोक्लोराइट

सोल्यूशन

ए पी वाटर टेस्टिंग एक्विपमेंट कंपोनि प्लाट नं. 43/ ए, एस वी को अपोरेटिव इन्ड. एस्टेट बालानगर , हैदराबाद आन्ध्र प्रदेश-500 037 9901

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

एफ ए डी परिचालित

27-03-2008

14543 : 2004

28-03-2007

साई सिरी इड्स्ट्रीस

72. 6685290

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

प्लाट नं. 139, 146 अंड 147 इन्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट गिद्दलूरू, प्रकाशम डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश

29-03-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित

14543: 2004

30-03-2007

जेट्टि फार्मा इड्स्ट्रीस

73. 6686797

पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेज- बंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल केअलावा)

डी नं. 8-38-3 आर टी सी कालोनी रोड, सर्वे नं 143 , विवेकानंदा नगर कोत्तापेटा, चिराला , प्रकाशम डि. आन्ध्रप्रदेश-523 157

March 2007

Division Status

Validity

GOL Date

Licensee Name &Address

CML No.

IS No & Product

SI. No.

01-03-2007

1. 6668290

05-03-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

Sri Sai Partha & Co. # 31/174, Κ.Ν. Road Puttur Chittoor District Chittoor Puttur Andhra Pradesh

MTD

01-03-2010

2. 6666185

01-03-2007

Operative

IS 1417 1999 Gold and gold alloys, jewellery/artefacts fineness and marking

Maddikera Viswanatham Jewellers H.No.4-4-39, Subhash X Road Medak Siddipet Andhra Pradesh-502103

MTD

01-03-2010

01-03-2007

3. 6666387

Operative

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts fineness and marking

Mahalaxmi Jewellers Shop No.G-3 Sri Giri Complex Opp:Dilsukhnagar Bus Stop Dilsukhnagar Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh -500660

02-03-2007

01-03-2010 MTD

4. 6666286

Operative VPG Jewellers 20-2-48 , Pamur Road Prakasam Kandukur Andhra Pradesh- 523105

IS 1417 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts fineness and marking

02-03-2007

01-03-2008 FAD

Operative 5. 6666084

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

Yuthish Industries Sy. No.361 B Uttukottai to Sathyaveda Main Road Seetharampet Village- 517588 Ambakkam Panchayat , Sathyaveda Mandal Chittoor District Chittoor Seetharampet Village Andhra Pradesh -517588

02-03-2007

04-03-2008 FAD

Operative 6. 6667591

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

Uma Maheshwari Products D.Na.593 /B, Satuluru (V) , Nadendla (M) , Guntur Andhra Pradesh

04-03-2008 FAD

02-03-2007 IS 14543 : 2004

Operative 7. 6667692

Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

AquaGold Industries Shop No.39 & 40, Kesharajpally Shirdi Sai Complex Near New Collectorate Nalgonda- 503001 Nalgonda District Nalgonda Andhra Pradesh- 508001 .

9902

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

4 8. 6670075

02-03-2007 Sai Ram Minerals D.No.8-386 , Sai Nagar , S.N. Puram Chittor Jeevakona Andhra Pradesh-517501

9. 6670176

05-03-2007 Chandamama Water Products D.No. 11-49/ 1 , Near Dwarak Nagar , Jubilee Hills Chittor Chandragiri Andhra Pradesh- 517101

10 . 6670378

05-03-2007 Vidata Mineral Water S.No.79 , Pathuru Cross Road , NH 5, Guntur Tadepali Andra Pradesh -522501

11. 6670479

05-03-2007 Suzuki Foods & Beverages Industries S.No.810/2 , Nandiraju Thota, Guntur Baptla(M) Andhra Pradesh

12. 6674285

05-03-2007 Sri Dheeraj Ramya Industries Navlok Gardens Opp . Vidyavihar School Nellore Rural Mandal Nellore District Nellore Andhra Pradesh

05-03-2007 13. 6669292 R.M. Industries R.M. Purifide Drinking Water LIG 64 , New Housing Board Colony Savargaon Adilabad Andhra Pradesh

14. 6668896

05-03-2007 Balaji Aqua Products Opp: Ayyappaswamy Temple , R.S.No.512/ 2 , Velvadam , Myalavaram Mandal Krishna Andhra Pradesh -521230

15. 6671582

05-03-2007 Sahara Aqua Products H.No.4/2-20-6-5 Indira Nagar Extension Madanapallee Chittor madanapallee Andhra Pradesh

16. 6668593

05-03-2007 Varun Water Industries Plot No.26 , Opp . Kumari Ice Company, Industrial Estate Guntur Narsaropet Andhra Pradesh - 522 601

17 6678596

07-03-2007 Bhaskari Electrical Systems Pvt. Ltd Plot No.D-98/B , Phase- I IDA , Jeedimetla Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh

18. 6668694

07-03-2007

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

8 07-03-2008 FAD

Under stop Marking

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

07-03-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

07-03-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water )

07-03-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

14-03-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

06-03-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

06-03-2008 FAD

Under stop Marking

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water )

11-03-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water )

05-03-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water )

20-03-2008 ETD Operative

IS 3017 : 1985 Thermostats for use with electric water heaters

08-03-2008 FAD Operative

IS 1008

2004

Hard boiled sugar

confectionery

Sri Sudhavalli Food Products S/No.492 Industrial Estate Mydudur Road, Kuthapalli Panchayat , Cuddapah Proddatur Andhra Pradesh- 516362

19. 6669999

08-03-2007 K.J.Industries R.S.No.176 Opp : Prakash Engineering Works Enikepadu Vill . Vijayawada Rural- 521108 Krishna District Krishna Vijayawada Rural Andhra Pradesh - 521108

07-03-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural inineral water ) 9903

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

8 3

09-03-2007

20. 6670984

08-03-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

Trinity Beverages Pvt . Ltd. 6-25, Survey No.202 , Pati Ghanpur, Pathancheru Medak Pathancheru Andhra Pradesh-502300

09-03-2007

11-03-2008 FAD

21. 6671481

Operative Sri Sai Food & Beverages 6-130 , Peta Gadda Nandalur Cuddapah Andhra Pradesh- 516150

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

09-03-2007

Operative

12-03-2008- FAD

22. 6671885

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water )

Vijay Industries Phase III , Shed No.4 J.A. Nagar Vijaywada-520007 Krishna Distt Krishna Vijaywada Andhra Pradesh-520007

12-03-2008 FAD

09-03-2007

23. 6671986

Operative Sri Indushekhara Beverages # 14-12 /3 , Hansanparthy S.No. 179, Warangal Andhra Pradesh

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water )

12-03-2008 FAD

24. 6672281

09-03-2007

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water )

Kasturi Aqua Industries R.S.No.423 / 1 Sulthanagaram Machilipatnam- 521001 Krishna Distt Krishna Machilipatnam Andhra Pradesh-521001

14-03-2008 FAD

09-03-2007

25. 6673081

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

Sivaganga Purified Drinking Water # 7/84 & 85, Jayanagar Colony, Chinna Chowk Cuddapah Kadapa Andhra Pradesh

MTD

08-03-2010

09-03-2007

26. 6671077

Operative

IS 1417 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- fineness and marking

R.S. Jewellers 9-36, Lalitha Nagar Beside Mega Cinema Theatre Dilsukhnagar Hyderabad Andra Pradesh -500660

08-03-2010 MTD

27. 6671178

09-03-2007

Operative

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- fineness and marking

R.S. Jewellers 1-1-76 to 82 Beside Yashoda Hospital R.P. Road, Patny Centre Hyderabad Secunderabad Andra Pradesh

08-03-2010 MTD

09-03-2007

28. 6671279

Operative

IS 1417 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- fineness and marking

Ruby Jewellers 11-5-2 to 7 & 11-5-603 to 60 Red Hills Nampally Hyderabad Andra Pradesh- 500028

MTD

08-03-2010

29. 6671380

09-03-2007

Operative

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- fineness and marking

Venkataramana Jewellers 20-12-143 , Santha Bazaar Near Vegetable Market Prakasam Chirala Andra Pradesh- 523155

13-03-2008 FAD

13-03-2007

30. 6672786

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water )

Sri Prayas Industries H. No.2-239, Near Nalanda Degree College N.H.No.7 , Dasnapoor ( vil ) , Mavala Gram Panchayat Adilabad Andhra Pradesh

13-03-2008 FAD

14-03-2007

Operative 31. 6672988

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water )

Sri Venkateswara Industries Sy.No.307/1GGudipallipadu Village Allipuram Post Nellore Rural Main Nellore Distt Nellore Rural Andhra Pradesh

4935 G1/07-14 9904

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II SEC . 3(ii ) ] 1

32. 6673485

14-03-2007

14-03-2010 MTD Operative Janata Jewellers 14/16 , Mandapala Street Nellore Andra Pradesh- 524001

IS 1417: 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- fineness and marking

33. 6673586

14-03-2007

14-03-2010 MTD Operative

IS 1417: 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- fineness and marking

Sri Balaji Jewellers 4-1-968/ 1 , Abids Road Opp: Santosh Sapna Theatre Hyderabad Andra Pradesh --500001

34. 6673687

14-03-2007

MTD

14-03-2010

Operative Santilal & Sons Jewellers 12/1617 , Chinna Bazaar Nellore Andra Pradesh -524001

IS 1417 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- fineness and marking

35. 6673788

14-03-2007

14-03-2010 MTD Operative

IS 1417 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- fineness and marking

Bombay Jewellers Shop No.3 , Jai Hind Complex Rajagopalachari Street Krishna Vijaywada Andra Pradesh-520002

36. 6673889

14-03-2007

14-03-2010 MTD Operative Sree Mahaveer Jewellery House No. 32. Bazaar Street Chittor Tirupati Andhra Pradesh- 517501

IS 1417 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- fineness and marking

37. 6673990

14-03-2007

14-03-2010 MTD Operative Musaddilal Sons 125 , M.G. Road Parklane Hyderabad, Secunderabad Andhra Pradesh-500003

IS 1417 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- fineness and marking

38. 6674083

14-03-2007

14-03-2010 MTD Operative

IS 1417 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- fineness and marking

Bombay Jewels Paradise 27-23-112 , Rajagopalachari Street Opp: AMC Complex Krishna Vijayawada Andhra Pradesh-520002

39. 6674184

14-03-2007

14-03-2010 MTD Operative i

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- fineness and marking

Harsh Jewellers 8-3-944/ 12/1 & 2 Ahmed Commercial Complex Ameerpet Hyderabad Andra Pradesh- 500016

40. 6672887

14-03-2007

13-03-2008 MTD Operative Tirupati Udyog Ltd. 8-2-629/ 1/ a/3 , 11 Floor Vish Bhavan , Road No. 12 , Banjara Hills , Hyderabad-500034 Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh - 500034

IS 2830 : 1992 Carbon steel cast billet ingots, billets , blooms & slabs for re- rolling into steel for general structural purposes

41. 6674386

14-03-2007

14-03-2008 MED Operative

IS 12933 : Part 1 : 2000 Solar Flat Plate Collector Part 1 requirements

Sri Sundaram Solar Solutions 8-2-70 , Harshavardhan Colony Old Bowenpally Hyderabad, Secunderabad Andra Pradesh

42. 6678697

15-03-2007

20-03-2008 ETD Operativc

IS 694 1990 PVC insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100 V.

Challa Cables Pvt . Limited # 5-246/9/ 2 , H.P.C Road , Moosapet Rangareddi Hyderabad Andra Pradesh - 500018

43. 6675186

15-03-2007

15-03-2008 FAD

Under Stop Marking

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water )

Om Sai Beverages D.No.74-24-30/2 Edupugallu-521151 Kankipadu Mandal Krishna District Krishna Edupugallu Andhra Pradesh - 521151

44. 6675287

15-03-2007

15-03-2008 FAD

Under Stop Marking

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

TTK Industries PlotNo.10-144/D , Yerramareddypalem Road Beside Industrial Estate Renigunta Road Tirupati -517507 Chittor Tirupati Andhra Pradesh -- 517507 9905

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

20-03-2008 FAD

16-03-2007

45. 6676087

Operative

IS 14543: 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

Sri Sai Balaji Aqua Industries Opp: Central School Nallapadu Guntur- 522005 , Guntur District Guntur, Andhra Pradesh-522005

27-03-2008 FAD

20-03-2007

46. 6684490

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

Sivani Traders Sy.No.259/2 Oguru-523105 Kandukur Mandal , Prakasam Distt. Prakasam , Oguru, Andhra Pradesh-523105

22-03-2008 FAD

20-03-2007

47. 6679598

Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

Thirumala Industries H.No. 8-52/4 , S.No. 160/A Near Koti Lingala Temple Reddy Pallem , Gorre Kunta, Warangal , Andhra Pradesh

20-03-2007

48 , 6685896

28-03-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

Aqua Choice Packaged . Drinking Water # 5-33A , Madhava Nagar, Rajiv Nagar Panchayat , Tirupati- 517502 Chittoor District Chittoor , Tirupati Andhra Pradesh-518502

20-03-2007

49. 6686696

29-03-2008 FAD . Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

Sri Vijaya Lakshmi Aqua Products D.No. 8/62, Narayanapuram Dachepally-522414 Guntur Distt Guntur Dachepally Andhra Pradesh - 522414

50. 6690687

21-03-2007

04-04-2008 ETD Operative Pawan Power & Telecom Ltd. Plot No. 141/1 , IDA Bollaram Narasapur Tq. Medak Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh- 502325

IS 14255 1995 Aerial Bunched Cables for working voltages upto and including 1100 volts

MTD

23-03-2007

25-03-2010

Operative 51. 6681787

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- fineness and marking

Chandana Brothers Textiles and Jewellery Pvt . Ltd. D.No.1-1-88 to 91 R.P. Road, Opp:Head Post Office Hyderabad , Secunderabad Andhra Pradesh -500003

23-03-2007

25-03-2010 MTD

52. 6681888

Operative

IS 1417 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- fineness and marking

SitaJewellers 5-38, Tara Nagar , Lingampally, Near BHEL Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh - 500050

25-03-2010 MTD

23-03-2007

53, 6681989

Operative Katta Jewellers 8-3-322 , Main Bazar Anantapur Hindupur Andhra Pradesh - 515201

IS 1417 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- fineness and marking

23-03-2007

02-04-2008 FAD

54. 6687799

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

Sai Sri Food & Aqua Products, D.No.274 Perecherla , Medikonduru Mandal Guntur, Distt. Guntur Perecherla , Andhra Pradesh

02-04-2008 FAD

23-03-2007

Operative 55. 6688397 Sri Sai Beverages , # 5-45/ 1 , Parvatapur Village , Ghatkesar Mandal , Rangareddi , Andhra Pradesh

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water )

28-03-2008 FAD

23-03-2007

Operative 56. 6685997 R K Beverages , Plot Nos . , 52 & 54, Garudadri Nagar , Nandyal Road , Kurnool Andhra Pradesh -518002

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water ) 9906

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

5 57. 6679699

23-03-2007 Health Beverages , D.No.4-30-33/6 , E.T. Colony Itha Nagar, Tenali -522201 Guntur Distt. , Guntur , Tenali Andhra Pradesh -522201

58. 6680078

23-03-2007 SRS Mineral Products 9-68 , T.B. Road, Guntakal-515801 , Ananthapur Distt. , Anantapur , Guntakal Andhra Pradesh -515801

59. 6681282

23-03-2007 Sri Bhargavi Beverages Industries H.No.EWSH - 259 , IInd Phase, Moula Ali Housing Board, Hyderabad-500040 , Ranga Reddy, Distt . Rangareddi Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh-500040

60. 6681383

23-03-2007 A.R Industries Plot No Block 32 , Auto Nagar Hayat Nagar , Mandal , Rangareddi , Andhra Pradesh -500070

23-03-2007 61. 6681484 Tankasala Aqua Minerals #30-20-4, Elura Road , Near SER Centre, Enikepadu , Vijayawada Rular Mandal -521 108 Krishna Distt . Krishna Vijayawada Andhra Pradesh-521108

62. 6681585

23-03-2007 MSS Beverages No.25-88 , Gollaguda Subash Nagar, Tirumalagiry Rangareddi Secunderabad Andhra Pradesh- 500015

63. 6685391

23-03-2007 Krishna Kayva Hygene Products Sy.No.773 , Reddy Palle Atlur ( M.D. ), Kadapa Distt. Cuddapah Kadapa Andhra Pradesh

64. 6685492

23-03-2007 SLV Enterprises , 2-72 , Annojiguda Ghatkesar , Mandal Rangareddi , Andhra Pradesh

65. 6682183

23-03-2007 Sai Kishore Purifiers , 4-585 , S.S. R. Nagar, Podili , Road, Darsi Prakasam Distt. Parkasam Dassi Andhra Pradesh

66. 6682284

23-032007 New Ganga Packege , Sy. No. 871 , Near Potladurthi Bridge, Potladurthi Village , Yeraguntla Mandal , Kadapa , Distt. Cuddapah Potladurthi , Andhra Pradesh

67. 6683791

27-03-2007 Devashree Ispat ( P) Ltd. Survey No.460, Ellikatta (V) Farroq Nagar , Mandal Shadnagar , Tq . Mahbubnagar , Mahaboobnagar, Andhra Pradesh

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

22-03-2008 FAD

Under stop Marking

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

22-03-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

25-03-2008 FAD

Under stop Marking

IS 14543 2004 Package drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

25-03-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

25-03-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Package drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

25-03-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

28-03-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water )

28-03-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

25-03-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Package drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water )

26-03-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 2004 Package drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water )

26-03-2008 CED Operative

IS 1786 1985 High Strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement 9907 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

8 2

MTD

28-03-2010

28-03-2007

Operative 6686090

68.

IS 1417 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- fineness and marking 1999

Lalitha Jewellers , Shop No.25 , Municipal Complex, Subhash Road , Near Clock Tower , Anantapur , Andhra Pradesh- 515001

MTD

28-03-2010

6686191

28-03-2007

69 .

Operative S. V. Jewellers , D.No. 11-49-348 , Sivalayam Street, Krishna Vijayawada Andhra Pradesh -520001

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- fineness and marking

28-03-2007

28-03-2010 MTD

70. 6685795

Operative Vinayaka Jewellers , 4-1-293 , Post Office Road, Karimnagar , Andhra Pradesh- 505001

IS 1417 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- fineness and marking

28-03-2008 CHD

28-03-2007

Operative 71. 6685593

IS 11673 Sodium Hypochlorite Solution 1992

A.P. Water Testing, Equipment Company , Plot No.43 /A, S.V. Co -Op . Industrial Estate, Hyderabad Balanagar, Andhra Pradesh-500037

28-03-2007

27-03-2008 FAD

72. 6685290

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

Sai Sri Industries , Plot No. , 139 , 146 & 147 Industrial Estate Giddaluru , Prakasam , Distt . Prakasam , Giddaluri , Andhra Pradesh

73. 6686797

30-03-2007

29-03-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water)

Jetty Pharma Industries , D. No.8-38-3 RTC Colony Road , Sy . No.143 , Vivekanand Nagar Kothapeta , Chirala- 523157 Vetapalem Mandal Prakasam Distt . , Prakasam Chirala , Andhra Pradesh - 523157

अप्रैल 2007

वर्ष वैधता विभाग

क्रम लाईसेंस सं. लाईसेंसधारी का नाम स्वीकृत करने भा मा संख्या भारतीय

स्थिति स्टेटर्स व पता

सं.

कीतिथि वर्ष/ माह

मानक शीषर्क

9 3

3-4-08

परिचालित

2-4-2007 14543:2004

एफ ए डी

1. 6688498

पेकेजबंद पेय जल( पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा)

श्री विष्णु एन्टरप्राईजेस, 110/383 , अशोक नगर , नेल्लोर रोड , बडवेल -516227 , आंध्र प्रदेश

8-4-08

14543:2004

परिचालित

2-4-2007

एफ ए डी

2. 6691386

पेकेजबंद पेय जल( पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा)

श्री बालाजी बाटलर्स 6-3187/1/बी , प्लाट नं. 8 जै नगर कालोनी, न्यूबोइगुडा हैदराबाद , सिकंदराबाद-500380

4-4-08

परिचालित

2-4-2007 14543 :2004

एफ ए डी

3. 6690889

पेकेजबंद पेय जल( पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा )

श्री भधिरथा इंडस्ट्रिस एच नं. 1-216/1 , मारूती नगर , आदिलाबाद मंचिरियल आंध्र प्रदेश -504208 9908

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

5-4-2007

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 5

14543:2004

सूर्या तेजा आखवा

4. 6691184

मिनरलस सर्वे नं. 1006 ,

1008,778 तंगेडारोड , दाचेपल्ली पोस्ट एंड मंडल गुंटूर जिला , गुंटूर आंध्र प्रदेश -522414

5-4-2007 पेकेजबंद पेय 8-4-08

एफ ए डी परिचालित जल( पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा)

8-4-08

14543 :2004

गौतमी इंडस्ट्रिस

5. 6691285

प्लाट नं. 50 ,

इलेक्ट्रानिक्स कांमप्लेक्स( एक्सटेन्शन ) कुशईगुडा, हैदराबाद रंगा रेड्डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -500062

5-4-2007 मंजीरा आखवा प्राडक्टस

6. 6690778

पेकेजबंद पेय

एफ ए डी परिचालित जल( पेकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा)

14543:2004

डोर नं. 3-61 , केअर ऑफ

हबिबुल्ला पेदापालाकल्लूरू विलेज गुंटूर , गुंटूर रूरल

आंध्र प्रदेश

7. 6691487 एस एम वी डी आर वो प्रौ 5-4-2007 पेकेजबंद पेय 4-4-08

एफ ए डी परिचालित जल(पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा)

14543 :2004

नं.5--35/234,

दुगर्रशक्तीपीठम कुकटपल्ली, बालानगर मंडल रंगा रेड्डी जिला, कुकटपल्ली,

आंध्र प्रदेश

5-4-2007 पेकेजबंद पेय 8-4-08 एफ ए डी परिचालित जल(पेकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा)

14543 :2004

8. 6691588 सी एम इंडस्ट्रिस

चिलाकुर, चिलाकुर

मंडल गुटूर ,

नेल्लोर जिला, नेल्लोर

5-4-2007 9. 6691891 जी एम अमरेशवरप्पा

पेकेजबंद पेय 8-4-08 एफ ए डी परिचालित जल(पेकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के आलावा)

8-4-08

14543 :2004

आखवा इंडस्ट्रिस

एच नं. 1/1917 ,. गाँधी नगार कर्नूल, एम्मिगानूर-518360

आंध्र प्रदेश

5-4-2007

एफ ए डी परिचालित पेकेजबंद पेय जल(पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा)

9-4-08

14543 :2004

10. 6692287 श्री सुजाला बीवेरेजेस

सर्वे नं. 54, 66

श्रीनिवासापुर, महबूबनगर वनापर्ती,

आंध्र प्रदेश-509103

5-4-2007 पेकेजबंद पेय

एफ ए डी परिचालित जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा)

22-4-08

14543 :2004

11. 6700563 श्री बालाजी इंडस्ट्रिस

एच नं.1-195/1 , चिंताहत्तु

रोड भिमावरम( वि ) , हसनपर्ती ( एम ) वंरंगल , आंध्र प्रदेश-504208

पेकेजबंद पेय

एफ ए डी परिचालित जल( पेकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा) [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

4 1

5-4-2007

9909

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

परिचालित

15-4-08 एफ ए डी

14543:2004

12. 6694695 श्री साई इंडस्ट्रिस

एच.नं.12-8-312, हन्टर रोड कडापा, पुलिकेंडला आंध्र प्रदेश-516390

5-4-2007 पेकेजबंद पेय जल(पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा)

15-4-08

परिचालित

14543:2004

6695394

13.

धरणी एन्टरप्रईजेस 9/20, डिग्री कालेज रोड कडापा, पुलिवेंडला आंध्र प्रदेश -516390

एफ ए डी

पेकेजबंद पेय जल(पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा)

15-4-08

परिचालित पेकेजबंद पेय

एफ ए डी

5-4-2007 14543 :2004

6695495 विराभद्रेशवरा फुड एंड

14.

बीवेरेजेस नं 16-11-16/वी/3/ए आर टी ए कार्यालय के पीछे प्रशांतनगर, हैदराबाद मूसारमबाग , आंध्र प्रदेश

5-4-2007 6695596

15.

भानु इंडस्ट्रिस सर्वे नं. 161/ए, पेछदाकोटाला (जी पी ) कर्नूल , नंध्याल मंडल आंध्र प्रदेश

5-4-2007 जल(पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा)

26-4-08

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

14543:2004 पेकेजबंद पेय जल(पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा)

26-4-08

परिचालित

14543:2004

16. 6702365 जै गणेश वाटर सप्लयर्स

डोर नं. 161/287-सी, अरविंद नगर, पामुरी , अनंतपुर आंध प्रदेश

10-4-2007 17. 6695697 गोदावरी आखवा मिनरलस सर्वे नं. 206, हनुमान नगर आदिलाबाद मंचिरियल आंध्र प्रदेश-504208

10-4-2007 श्री लक्षमी प्रसन्ना इंडस्ट्रिस

18. 6696396

एच नं.28-1-3200/ 1 , काल्टेक्स एरिया बेल्लमपल्ली आदिलाबाद आंध्र प्रदेश-516390

10-4-2007 19.6696497 साई इंडस्ट्रिस पेकेजड ड्रिकिंग वाटर सर्वे नं. 136 , चिंताकुटा करिमनगर , आंध्र प्रदेश

एफ ए डी

पेकेजबंद पेय जल( पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा )

परिचालित

16-4-08 एफ ए डी

14543 :2004 पेकेजबंद पेय जल( पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा )

17-4-08

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

14543 :2004 पेकेजबंद पेय

जल(पेकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के आलावा)

17/4/08

पेकेजबंद पेय

14543 :2004

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

जल( पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा )

परिचालित

9-4-08

14543 :2004

10-4-2007 श्री साई बालाजी इंडस्ट्रिस

20. 6692388

डोर नं.283 , पेरिचेरला मेडिकॊडूरू मंडल गुंटूर जिला, गुंटूर

आंध्र प्रदेश-522009

एफ ए डी

पेकेजबंद पेय जल( पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा)

17-4-08

14543 :2004

11-4-2007 21. 6696598 श्री विजया इंडस्ट्रिस

डोर नं. 10-1-20

बालाजी राव पेट, पहली लेन ओंगोल-523001 प्रकासम आंध्र प्रदेश

पेकेजबंद पेय

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

जल( पेकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा) 9910

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

4 1

22. 6694797 मेसर्स रामनाथ

11-4-2007 ओंकारमाल स्टिल रोलिंग

मिल्स ( प्रा. ) लि. सर्वे नं. 115/2 /ए/ए , तिगापुर विलेज आई डी ए , कोत्तूर मेहबूबनगर,

आंध्र प्रदेश

23. 6697196

16-4-2007 गोल्डेन ज्वेलरी 12/1082, चिन्ना बाजार नेल्लोर , आंध्र प्रदेश-524001

24. 6700268 विज टेक्नालाजीस

16-4-2007 डी-143 , फेज 3 आई डी ए, जिडिमेटला रंगा रेड्डी, हैदराबाद , आंध्र प्रदेश

25. 6700462 गुड एर्त एवेन्यूस ( प्रा. ) लि. 16-4-2007 डोर नं. 26/2/2796, नियर ड्राइवर्स कालनी नेल्लोर पादुरू पल्ली , आंध्र प्रदेश

संगामेश्सवरा पेकेजड

26. 6700159

16-4-2007 ड्रिंकिंग वाटर सर्वे नं. 258/ 45एकोंडामडुगु विलेज आंध्र प्रदेश -508126 राजुपालेम मंडल, गुंटूर , आंध्र प्रदेश

17-4-2007 पुणीता एन्टरप्राइजेस

27. 6697297

डोर नं. 3-16/1 , आपोः आरसीएम स्कूल एफ सी आई गोडाउन के पीछे अटापाका-521333 कैकालूर मंडल , कृष्ण जिला आंध्र प्रदेश-521333

17-4-2007 28. 6701262 वाटर सोल्यूषण कम्पनी

नियर आई सी आई गोदाम

जनापल्ली रोड, अर्सापल्ली निजामाबाद आंध्र प्रदेश -503186

17-4-2007 29. 6700361 हिमानी आखचा मिनरलस

आपोः रामाकृष्ण सिनेमा

थिएटर पेटासन्नेगंडला पी ओ: 522614 कारमपुडी मंडल, गुंटूर आंध्र प्रदेश

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] 5

1786: 1985 कंक्रीट प्रबलन 17-4-08 एस एम डी परिचालित के लिए उच्च सामर्थ्यविकसित इस्पात छड और तार

1417: 1999 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण 17-4-2010 एम टी डी परिचालित मिश्रधातुएं

आभूषण/शिल्पकारी

शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

13340: 1993 पावर केपासिटर 18-4-08 ई टी डी परिचालित ऑफ सेल्फ-

हिलिंग टाइप ए.सी. पावर सिस्टमस 650 वोल्टेज की सीमा तक दर रखते हुए

18-4-08

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

14543 :2004 पेकेजबंद पेय

जल ( पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543 :2004 पेकेजबंद पेय 18-4-08 एफ ए डी परिचालित जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा )

14543 :2004 पेकेजबंद पेय 17-4-08 एफ एडी चिन्ह

निषेध

में है जल(पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543 :2004 पेकेजबंद पेय 23-4-08 एफ ए डी परिचालित जल (पेकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

14543 :2004 पेकेजबंद पेय 18-4-08 एफ ए डी परिचालित जल( पेकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

4 1

17-4-2007 6705169 एम डी इंडस्ट्रिस

30:

सर्वे नं. 806/1 , साईबाबापेटा न्यूहस्पताल रोड नंदीकोत्तूर मंडल कर्नूल, आंध्र प्रदेश

23-4-2007 31. 6703670 एन आर सी इंडस्ट्रिस

संदीपेटा विलेज श्रीसैलम मंडल कर्नूल-518102 आंध्र प्रदेश -518102

23-4-2007 32. 6702971 वंदना इंडस्ट्रिस

एच नं. 5/82/5 , दुलापल्ली विलेज रंगा रेड्डी , हैदराबाद आंध्र प्रदेश

23-4-2007 33. 6700664 रम्या बीवेरजेस एंड

डिसटिलरीस (प्रा. ) लि. एच नं. 7-1-307/14/ जी/सी/ 11 बीके गुडा, लिंगथ्था नगर हैदराबाद, सनतनगर, आंध्र प्रदेश

23-4-2007 34. 6701161 वेंकटेशवर फुड प्राडक्टस

प्लाट नं. 20, स्ट्रीट नं. 4 आई डी ए, मल्लापूर रंगा रेड्डी, हैदराबाद , आंध्र प्रदेश -500076

23-4-2007 35. 6701666 स्वर्णा मिनि ड्रिंकिंग वाटर एम पी डी ओ कार्यालय के पीछे विनुकोंडा टाउन् 504208 गुंटूर जिला , विनुकोंडा आंध्र प्रदेश

श्री लक्षमी नरसिंहा प्यूरिराइड 23-4-2007 36. 6701767

ड्रिंकिंग वाटर सर्वे नं. 64/2, चेन्नुपाडु-523111 पोन्नालुरू मंडल प्रकासम जिला प्रकासम ,

आंध्र प्रदेश -523111

23-4-2007 37. 6702062 एस एम आर बीवेरेजेस

9911

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

9 5

7-5-08

14543 :2004 पेकेजबंद पेय

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

जल(पेकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

3-5-08

परिचालित

14543 :2004 पेकेजबंद पेय

एफ ए डी

जल( पेकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के अलावा)

30-4-08

14543 :2004

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

पेकेजबंद पेय जल(पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

22-4-08

परिचालित

14543 :2004 पेकेजबंद पेय

एफ ए डी

जल (पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543 :2004 पेकेजबंद पेय 23-4-08

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

जल (पेकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के अलावा)

23-4-08

परिचालित

14543 :2004 पेकेज़बंद पेय

एफ ए डी

जल( पेकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के अलावा)

24-4-08

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

14543:2004 पेकेजबंद पेय

जल ( पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के अलावा)

26-4-08

14543 :2004 पेकेजबंद पेय

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

जल(पेकेजबंद

एच नं. 1-10-25 , कुशइगुडा

रंगा रेड्डी, हैदराबाद,

आंध्र प्रदेश -500062

23-4-2007 श्री सूर्या एन्टरप्राइजेस

38. 6702163

डोर नं. 7-136

एन एच 5 , जी टी रोड

र्मातूर-523301

प्रकासम जिला, प्रकासम

आंध्र प्रदेश

4935 GI/07-15

प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

26-4-08

14543 :2004 पेकेजबंद पेय

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

जल(पेकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के अलावा) 9912

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

4 1

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] 5

परिचालित

1417 1999

23-4-2007 39. 6701363 त्रिभूवनदास भिमजी जवेरी 70, ग्रिनलैंड, पंजागुट्टा हैदराबाद आंध्र प्रदेश -500082

6701464 देवी ज्वेलर्स

40.

23-04-2007 7-1-58/3 , आपो: विजय टेक्सटाईल्स सुरेखा चेम्बर्स , नियर लाल बंड्गलो अभिरपेट हैदराबाद आंध्रा प्रदेश -500073

41. 6701565

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण 23/4/2010 एम टी डी

मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्प- कारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

1417 : 1999

परिचालित

एम टी डी

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण 23/4/2010 मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्प- कारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

परिचालित

23/4/2010 एम टी डी

23-04-2007 1417 : 1999

रमेश ज्वेलर्स 7-1-746, मार्केट स्ट्रिट हैदराबाद सिकंदराबाद आंध्रा प्रदेश-500003

42. 6702264

26-04-2007 श्री बालाजी पाइप इंडस्ट्रिस प्लाट नं. 30 , आई डी ए कामा रेड्डी निजामाबाद आंध्रा प्रदेश-503111

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण -मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्प- कारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

सी ई डी परिचालित

4984 : 1995

26/04/2008

पानी की आपूर्ति के लिए उच्च घनत्ववाले पॉलिएथिलीन पाइप

14543 : 2004

30-04-2007 43. 6704167 एस वी इंडस्ट्रिस

-10-340 , 11 बस डिपो के पीछे , न्यालकल रोड, निजामाबाद, आंध्रा प्रदेश

30-04-2007

03/05/2008 एम ए डी परिचालित पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

परिचालित

14543 : 2004

44 6704470 साईबाबा फूडस एंड बीवेरेजेस 1-2-28/डी 4-ए, सोफी नगर, एन एच , आदिलाबाद , निर्मल आंध्रा प्रदेश

एफ ए डी

03/05/2008

पेकेजबंद पेय जल ( पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543:2004

30-04-2007 45 6705674 पोन्नोलु फूड प्राडक्ट्स

सर्वे नं. 598, नियर पंचामुखा आँजानेया टेम्पल चेम्मुनियापेटा कडापा आंध्रा प्रदेश -516001

S. CML

Licensee Name &

GOL No. No.

Address

Date 1

4 1. 6688498 Sri Vishnu Enterprises 02-04-2007 110/383 , Ashok Nagar

NelloreRoad

पेकेजबंद पेय

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

09/05/2008

जल ( पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिकः मिनरल जल के अलावा )

APRIL 2007

Status Remarks

Division

Validity

IS No. & Product

9 5

FAD

03-04-2008

IS 14543 : 2004

Operative

Packaged

drinkingwater

Badvel- 516227

(other than

Kadapa District

Cuddapah Badvel

Andhra Pradesh

packaged

natural mineral

water)

516227 9913

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

08-04-2008 FAD

02-04-2007

Operative

IS14543 : 2004 Packaged drinkingwater (other than packaged natural mineral water)

6691386 Sri Balaji Bottlers 6-3187/ 1B , Plot No. 8 Jai Nagar Colony, NewBoiguda Hyderabad Secunderabad Andhra Pradesh- 500380

IS14543: 2004

04-04-2008 FAD Operative 6690889 Baghiratha Industries 02-04-2007 H. No. 1-216/ 1 , Maruthi Nagar, Adilabad, Mancherial Andhra Pradesh- 504208

Packaged

drinkingwater

(otherthan

packaged

natural mineral

water)

08-04-2008 FAD

05-04-2007

Operative 6691184

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinkingwater (other than packaged natural mineral water)

Surya Teja Aqua Minerals , Sy . No. 1006 , 1008,778 Tangeda Road Dachepalli Post & Mandal Guntur District-522414 GunturDachepalli Andhra Pradesh- 522414

FAD

08-04-2008

05-04-2007 IS 14543 : 2004

5. 6691285

Operative

Packaged

drinkingwater

(otherthan

packaged

natural mineral

water)

Gowtami Industries Plot No. 50 , Electronics Complex(Extn.), Kushaiguda Rangareddi , Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh- 500062

04-04-2008 FAD

05-04-2007 IS 14543 : 2004

Operative 6690788 Manjira Aqua Product, D. No. 3-61 /C/ o Shaik Habibulla Pedapalakaluru Village , Guntur, Guntur Rural , Andhra Pradesh

Packaged

drinkingwater

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

FAD

05-04-2007

08-04-2008

6691487

Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinkingwater (otherthan packaged natural mineral water)

SMVD RO PRO 5-35/234, Durga- shaktipeetan KukatpallyBalanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Rangareddi Kukatpally, Andhra Pradesh

FAD

05-04-2007

08-04-2008

8. 6691588

Operative C.M Industries Chillakur Chillakur Mandal Gudur, Nellore District Nellore Chillakur Andhra Pradesh

IS14543 : 2004

Packaged

drinkingwater

(otherthan

packaged

natural mineral

water)

9914

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

4 1

05-04-2007 6691891 G. M Amareswarappa Aqua Industries H. No. 1/1917, Gandhinagar Kurnool, Yemmiganur Andhra Pradesh 518360

05-04-2007 10. 6692287 Sri Sujala Bevereges Survey No. 54 66 Srinivaspur Mahbubnagar Wanaparthy Andhra Pradesh 509103

05-04-2007 11. 6700563 Sri Balaji Industries H. No. 1-195/ 1 , Chinthahattu Road , Bheemaram(V), Hasanparthy ( M ) Warangal , Andhra Pradesh 504208

05-04-2007 12. 6694695 Sri Sai Industries , H. No. 12-8-312, Hunter Road , Warangal Andhra Pradesh 506002

05-04-2007 13. 6695394 Dharani Enterprises 9/20-1, Degree CollegeRoad, Cuddapah Pulivendula Andhra Pradesh 516390

05-04-2007 14. 6695495 Veerabhadreshwara

Food & Beverages # 16-11-16/V/3/A, Beside RTA Office Prashanth Nagar , Hyderabad Moosarambagh Andhra Pradesh

05-04-2007 15. 6695596 Bhanu Industries S. No. 161 / 1A , Peddakottala (GP) Mandal Kurnool Nandyal Andhra Pradesh

05-04-2007 16. 6702365 Jai Ganesh Water Suppliers, D. No. 11 /287 -C, Aravind Nagar , Pamurai , Anantapur Andhra Pradesh

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 6

FAD

08-04-2008

Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinkingwater (otherthan packaged natural mineral water) FAD

09-04-2008

Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinkingwater (otherthan packaged natural mineral water) FAD

22-04-2008

Operative

IS14543 : 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water) 15-04-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinkingwater (other than packaged natural mineral water) FAD

15-04-2008

Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinkingwater (otherthan packaged natural mineral water) FAD

15-04-2008

Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinking water (otherthan packaged natural mineral water) 17-04-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinkingwater (otherthan packaged natural mineral water) 26-04-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 :2004 Packaged drinkingwater (other than packaged natural mineral water) [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

4 1

10-04-2007 17. 6695697 Godhavari Aqua Minerals Sy . No. 206, Hanuman Nagar Adilabad, Mancherial Andhra Pradesh 504208

9915

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

9 5

FAD

16-04-2008

Operative

IS 14543: 2004

Packaged

drinkingwater

(otherthan

packaged

natural mineral

water)

10-04-2007 18. 6696396 Sri Laxmi Prasanna Industries H. No. 28-1-3200/1 , CaltexArea, Bellampalli Adilabad Andhra Pradesh

19. 6696497

10-04-2007 Sai Industries Packaged DrinkingWater Sy. No. 136, Chinthakunta Karimnagar Andhra Pradesh

10-04-2007 20. 6692388 Sri Balaji Industries D. No. 283 , Perecherla - 522009 Medikonduru Mandal Guntur District Guntur Perecherla, Andhra Pradesh 522009

11-04-2007 21. 6696598 Vijaya Industries D. No. 10-1-20 Balaji Rao Pet, Ist Lane Ongole-523001 Prakasam District PrakasamOngole Andhra Pradesh 523001

22. 6694796

11-04-2007 17-04-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinkingwater (other than packaged natural mineral water)

FAD

17-04-2008

Operative

IS14543 : 2004 Packaged drinkingwater (other than packaged natural mineral water)

FAD

09-04-2008

Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinkingwater (otherthan packaged natural mineral water)

FAD

17-04-2008

Operative

IS 14543: 2004 Packaged drinkingwater (other than packaged natural mineral water)

CED

15-04-2008

IS 1786 : 1985

Operative

High strength

deformed steel

bars and wires

for concrete

reinforcement

M/ s Ramnath Onkarmal SteelRolling Mills Pvt . Ltd , Sy . No. 115 /2 /A/A Teegapur Village IDA, Kothur Mahbubnagar Andhra Pradesh

16-04-2007 6697196

23.

Golden Jewellery 12/1082, Chinna Bazaar Nellore Andhra Pradesh 524001

16-04-2007 24. 6700260 Viz Technologies (P) Ltd. D- 143 , Phase III IDA , Jeedimetla Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh 500055

17-04-2010 MTD Operative

IS 1417: 1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts - fineness and marking

18-04-2008 EID Operative

IS 13340: 1993 Power capacitors ofself-healing type for ac power systems having rated voltage up to650 9916

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

4 25. 6700462

16-04-2007 Good Earth Avenues ( P) Limited D. No. 26/2/2796 , Near DriversColony, Nellore paduru palli Andhra Pradesh

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii )] 5

IS 14543 : 2004 18-04-2008 FAD

Operative

Packaged

drinkingwater

(otherthan

packaged

water)

natural mineral

16-04-2007 26. 6700159 Sangameswara Packaged Drinking Water Sy. No. 258/45 A Kondamandugu Village Rajupalem Mandal Guntur District Guntur Kondamadugu Village Andhra Pradesh

17-04-2007 27. 6697297

Himani Aqua Minerals Opp . Ramakrishna Cinema Theatre Petasannegandla P.O. -522614 Karampudi Mandal Guntur District Guntur Karampudi Andhra Pradesh 522614

30. 6705169

17-04-2007 MD Industries S. No. 806/1 , Saibabapeta , New Hospital Road Nandikottur Mandal Kurnool Andhra Pradesh

23-04-2007 31. 6703670 NRC Industries Sundipeta Village Srisailam Mandal Kurnool Andhra Pradesh- 518102

07-05-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinkingwater (other than packaged natural mineral water)

FAD

03-05-2008

Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinkingwater (other than packaged natural mineral water) [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

4 1

9917

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

9 6

FAD

30-04-2008

IS 14543 : 2004

23-04-2007 32. 6702971 Sri Vandana Industries H.No. 5-82/5 , Doolapally Village Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh

Operative

Packaged

drinkingwater

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

23-04-2007 33. 6700664 Ramya Beverages & Distilleries (P) Limited H. No. 7-1307/14/G/C/ 111 B. K. Guda, Lingaiah Nagar, Hyderabad Sanathnagar Andhra Pradesh

23-04-2007 34. 6701161 Venkateshwara Food Products

22-04-2008 FAD Operative

water) IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinkingwater (other than packaged natural mineral

FAD

23-04-2008

IS14543: 2004

Operative

Packaged

drinkingwater

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

PlotNo. 20 , Street No. 4 IDA, Mallapur Rangareddi , Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh 500076

23-04-2008

IS 14543: 2004

23-04-2007 35. 6701666

FAD Operative

Packaged

drinkingwater

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

Swarna Mini DrinkingWater D. No. 25-6 Behind MPDO Office Vinukonda Town- 504208 Guntur District Guntur. Vinukonda Andhra Pradesh 504208

23-04-2007 36. 6701767 Sri Lakshmi Narasimha PurifiedDrinking Water S. No. 64/2 Chennupadu -523111 Ponnaluru Mandal Prakasam District Prakasam Chennupadu Andhra Pradesh 523111

23-04-2007 SMR Beverages

37. 6702062

H. No. 1-10-25 , Kushaiguda , II Fooor , Rangareddi , Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh 500062

24-04-2008 FAD

IS14543: 2004

Operative

Packaged drinkingwater (other than packaged natural mineral water)-

FAD

26-04-2008

Operative

IS14543: 2004

Packaged

drinkingwater

(otherthan

packaged

natural mineral

water)

23-04-2007 38. 6702163 Sri Surya Enterprises

D. No. 7-136 N. H. 5 , G. T. Road, Martur-523301 Prakasam District Prakasam Martur Andhra Pradesh 523301

FAD

26-04-2008

Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinkingwater (other than packaged natural mineral water) 9918

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

4 39. 6701363

23-04-2007 Thribhovandas Bhimji

Zaveri

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii)] 5

IS 1417 : 1999

MTD

23-04-2010

Operative

Gold and gold

alloys, Jewellery/

artefacts - fineness

and marking

70, Greenland Road Punjagutta Hyderabad Andhra pradesh

500082

23-04-2007 40. 6701464 Devi Jewellers

7-1-58/3 Opp: Vijay Textiles Surekha Chambers , Near LaBunglow Ameerpet Hyderabad Andhra pradesh 500073

41. 6701565 Ramesh Jewellers

23-04-2007 7-1-746, Market Street Hyderabad Secunderabad Andhra pradesh 500003

26-04-2007 42. 6702264 Sri Balaji Pipe

Industries

IS 1417 : 1999 23-04-2010 MTD Operative

Goldandgold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts - fineness and marking-

23-04-2010 MTD Operative

IS 1417 : 1999 Goldandgold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts - fineness and marking-

IS 4984 : 1995 26-04-2008 MTD Operative

High density

polyethylene

pipesfor potable

water supplies

Plot No. 30 , IDA , Kamareddy Nizamabad Andhra pradesh

503111

30-04-2007 43. 6704167 S.V. Industries

3-10-340 Beside II Bus Depot Nyalkal Road Nizamabad Nizamabad Andhra Pradesh

FAD

IS 14543 : 2004 03-05-2008

Operative

Packaged

drinkingwater

(otherthan

packaged

natural mineral

water)

30-04-2007 44. 6704470 Sai Baba Foods &

Beverages 1-2-28/D4- A, Sofi Nagar N.H. Adilabad Nirmal Andhra Pradesh 504106

03-05-2008

IS 14543 : 2004

FAD Operative

Packaged

drinkingwater

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

Ponnolu Food Products 30-04-2007 45. 6705674

Sy. No. 598

IS 14543 : 2004 09-05-2008 FAD

Operative

Packaged

drinkingwater

(other than

water)

packaged

natural mineral

NearPanchamukha Anjaneya Temple Chemmuniyapet Cuddapah Andhra Pradesh 516001 9919

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22, 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

लाईसेंस सं. लाईसेंस धारी का नाम

क्रम सं

व पता

स्वीकृत करने कीतिथि वर्ष/ भाह 2

4 1. 6704571

3-5-2007

सिद्धिविनायाका इंडस्ट्रिस

सर्वे नं. 524/4बी,

एजी नगर

मदानापल्लीरोड रायाचोटी-516269 कडापा जिला , कडापा

आंध्र प्रदेश

मई 2007

वर्ष वैधता विभाग

भा मा सं.

स्थिति स्टेटर्स भारतीय मानक शीषर्क

9 5

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

14543 :2004 पैकेजबंद पेय 3-5-2008

जल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

8-5-2008

14543:2004

2. 6705371

3-5-2007

श्री सत्गुरू आखवा

मिनरलस सर्वे नं. 1-1सी 2

एस एस एस हस्पताल के पीछे

प्रशांतीग्राम, बीडुपल्ली अनंतपूर , पुटापर्ती

आंध्र प्रदेश-515134

3-5-2007 3. 6704268 रूपा आखवा इंडस्ट्रिस

डोर नं. 17/65 ,

गोनेगन्डला रोड

रायाचोटी-516269 एम्मिगानूर कर्नूल

आंध्र प्रदेश

4. 6703569

3-5-2007 पैकेजबंद पेय

जल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिकमिनरल

जल के अलावा)

3-5-2008

14543 :2004 पैकेजबंद पेय

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

जल ( पैकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के अलावा)

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

3-5-2008

14543: 2004

बालाजी आखवा इंडस्ट्रिट्स

पटिगारीस्ट्रिट

चेन्नूर, कडापा

आंध्र प्रदेश.

पैकेजबंद पेय

जल ( पेकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के अलावा)

परिचालित

3-5-2008 एफ ए डी

पैकेजबंद पेय

14543: 2004

4-5-2007 साईश्चिाबीवेरेजेस

5. 6704369

1-5 , धोलारी धनी के पीछे

मालाकुंटा बावी हकिमपेट

के जरिए रंगा रेड्डी

आंध्र प्रदेश-500014

जल (पैकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के अलावा)

3-5-2008

परिचालित पैकेजबंद पेय

14543: 2004

6. 6704066 श्री लक्षमी आखवा फ्रेश 4-5-2007 डोरनं. 5-8-6/6

नागार्जुना नगर

सत्तेनापल्ली विलेज एंड मंडल

गुंटूर जिला, गुंटूर

आंध्र प्रदेश-516269

एफ ए डी

जल ( पैकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के अलावा)

परिचालित

3-5-2008 एफ ए डी

पैकेजबंद पेय

14543 : 2004

7. 6705573

4-5-2007

सुनीता एन्टरप्राईजस

सर्वे नं. 1134

वी पी आर कंछिद्रब्गा

रेलवे , कोडूर कडापा

आंध्र प्रदेश-515134

4935 G1/07-16

जल ( पैकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के अलावा) 9920

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

8. 6705063 आर वी बीवेरेजेस

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] 5

14543: 2004

4-5-2007

प्लाट नं. 2 , ब्लाक नं. 63 अमिनपूर विलेज पटानचेरू मंडल , मेडक आंध्र प्रदेश-502032

9. 6705977 प्रवीण इंजनियरिंग इंडस्ट्रिस 4-5-2007

प्लाट नं. 22,

एच नं. 5-5-252/3 दुर्गशक्तीपीठक कालोनी , कुकटपल्ली, रंगा रेड्डी आंध्र प्रदेश -500037

10.

महर्शी एल्लायस

6706070

7-5-2007

(प्रा. ) लिमिटेड मधुगिरी रोड मोडाविलेज हिन्दुपूर, अनंतपुर आंध्र प्रदेश -515212

11. 6705775

पैकेजबंद पेय 8-5-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित जल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा)

0374: 1979

13-5-2008 ई टी डी परिचालित छत्त के बिजली के पंखे और

रेगुलेटर

1786: 1985 कंक्रीट प्रबलन 13-5-2008 एस एम डी परिचालित के लिए उच्च सामर्थ्य विकसित इस्पात छड़ और तार

14543: 2004

7-5-2007

बन्नारी इंडस्ट्रिस डोर नं. 3-1 पंचायत कार्यालय रोड गुंगूरू,विजयवाड़ा- 521139 , कृष्ण जिला आंध्र प्रदेश

12. 6710566

पैकेजबंद पेय 9-5-2008

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

जल( पेकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543: 2004

7-5-2007

एस जे एन्टरप्राइजेस

न्यूबैपास रोड कुप्पम-517425 चित्तूर जिला आंध्र प्रदेश

विनस आखवा मिनरलस

13. 6711972

पैकेजबंद पेय

एफ ए डी परिचालित

21-5-2008

जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

27-5-2008

14-5-2007 14543: 2004

आर एस नं. 128/9 ,

एन एच 5 मेन रोड, तेलाप्रोलु -521109 उंगुटूर मंडल , कृष्ण जिला आंध्र प्रदेश

14. 6710970

पैकेजबंद पेय

श्री बालाजी एन्टरप्राइजेस 14-5-2007 सर्वे नं. 64/1 ए,

वावीलाला नगर

अच्चमपेट रोड सत्तेनापल्ली-522403 गुंटूर जिला , गुंटूर

आंध्र प्रदेश

18. 6707274

14-5-2007 14543: 2004

साई सुजाला इंडस्ट्रिस

तुम्मूरू मंडल

नायाडुपेटा मंडल

नेल्लोरजिला

आंध्र प्रदेश

पैकेजबंद पेय 14-5-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के अलावा)

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

14-5-2008

पेकेजबंद पेय

जल ( पैकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के अलावा)

14543: 2004

19. 6708680

एंडविलेज

श्री साई बालाजी बीवेरेजेस 14-5-2007 सर्वे नं 229 , कुलाबगूर पोस्ट संगा रेड्डी,

मेडक

आंध्र प्रदेश-518102

14-5-2007 14543: 2004

20. 6708882 आदित्या इंडस्ट्रिस 2007

सर्वे नं 131 , मर्कापूर रोड

एर्रागुंडला पालेम विलेज एंड मंडल-523327 प्रकासम

आंध्र प्रदेश

14-5-2007 14543: 2004

विजाया वाटर प्राडक्टस

21. 6708983

रविपाडु रोड

नरसारावपेटा मंडल

गुंटूर जिला, गुंटूर

आंध्र प्रदेश

22. 6708377

14-5-2007 14543: 2004

कार्तीकेया आखवा इंडस्ट्रीस

नं. 18-6/ 15,गुंडेपेडीवारी

ट्रिट सत्तेनापल्ली-522403

गुंटूर

आंध्र प्रदेश

14-5-2007 14543 : 2004

गंगावाटर्स

23. 6708478

डोर नं. 19/74ए

अम्मावारी तोटा

न्यूजवीड

आंध्र प्रदेश -521201

पैकेजबंद पेय

एफ ए डी परिचालित

17-5-2008

जल ( पैकेजबंद'

प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के आलावा )

पैकेजबंद पेय

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

17-5-2008

जल ( पैकेजबंद

'प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के अलावा)

पैकेजबंद पेय

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

17-5-2008

जल ( पैकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के अलावा)

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

15-5-2008

पैकेजबंद पेय

जल (पैकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के आलावा)

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

16-5-2008

पैकेजबंद पेय

जल (पैकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) 9922

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

प्रसन्नौजनेया पैकेज्ड

24. 6706676

[ PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 5

14-5-2007 14543: 2004

ड्रिकिंग वाटर

सर्वे नं. 670 , कलावाकूरू

विलेज , अद्दन्की मंडल

प्रकासम जिला

आंध्र प्रदेश

25. 6706777 आखवा टेख

पैकेजबंद पेय 13-5-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित जल ( पैकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के अलावा )

14-5-2007 14543: 2004

डोर नं. 22-30,

साईपुरम कालनी

गोल्लापूडी

विजायावाडा रूरल

कृष्णा जिला

आंध्र प्रदेश

26. 6706979 श्री लक्षमी श्रिनिवासा

पैकेजबंद पेय

एफ ए डी परिचालित

13-5-2008

जल ( पैकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के लावा)

14-5-2007 14543 : 2004

इंडस्ट्रीस

डोर नं. 6-99 बी

सत्यानारायणापुरम

पामूर विलेज एंड मंडल

प्रकासम जिला

आंध्र प्रदेश-504208

27. 6708276 श्री बालाजी टी एम टी

पैकेजबंद पेय 14-5-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित जल ( पैकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के अलावा)

14-5-2007 14543: 2004

राडमिल्स

सर्वे नं. 193ए,

लक्षमीपुरम-बी ओ

ए/डब्लूउलिडाकोंडा- एस ओ

अस्वतापुरम ( वी ) कर्नूल

आंध्र प्रदेश-518218

28. 6708579 गोल्ड वरल्ड

पैकेजबंद पेय

एफ ए डी परिचालित

15-5-2008

जल (पैकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के आलावा)

14-5-2007 1417 : 1999

शाप नं. 1-29/1 ,

कौस्तुब टवर्स

सी टी वो कालनी

कोत्तापेटा

रंगा रेड्डी, हैदराबाद ,

आंध्र प्रदेश

29. 6709783 विशाखा इंडस्ट्रिस लिमिटेड स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण 16-5-2008 एम टी डी परिचालित मिश्रधातुएं,

आभूषण/

शिल्पकारी

शुद्धता एवं

मुहरांकन

14-5-2007 0459 : 1992

आजबेस्टास सीमेंट डिविजण

जुज्जूरू विलेज

विरुलापाडु मंडल

कृष्णा जिला

आंध्र प्रदेश

30. 6708175 महाशिव शक्ती स्टिल

एस्बेस्टॉस सीमेंट 20-5-2007 सी ई डी परिचालित की नालीदार और

अर्ध-नालीदार

सीमेंट की चद्दरों

कीविशिष्टि

15-5-2007 1786: 1985

रोलिंग मिल्स ( प्रा. ) लिमिटेड

नं. 22-6-206 , पत्तरधट्टी

हैदराबाद

आंध्र प्रदेश-500002

कंक्रीट प्रबलन 15-5-2008 एस एम डी परिचालित के लिए उच्च

सामर्थ्य विकसित

इस्पात छड़ और

तार [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

4 2

31. 6707072

9923

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

9 5

14-5-2008

परिचालित

12592: 2002

15-5-2007

जीपी आई हैदराबाद 6-6-76 बी कट्टेडान रंगा रेड्डी, हैदराबाद आंध्र प्रदेश-500077

32. 6709985

पूर्व ढलित कंक्रीट

सी ई डी

मैनहोल के ढक्कन व फ्रेम विशिष्टि

20-5-2010 एम टी डी परिचालित

18-5-2007 1417: 1999

राजलक्षमी ज्वेलर्स 4-1-1978, अबिदस हैदराबाद आंध्र प्रदेश

33. 6710061

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्प- कारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

18-5-2007 1417 : 1999

मंगात्राईज्वेलर्स 6-3-883 , अबिदस हैदराबाद आंध्र प्रदेश

34. 6710162

21-5-2010 एम टी डी परिचालित स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्प- कारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

18-5-2007 1417 : 1999

श्री कमालालया ज्वेलर्स शाप नं. 17 , एएम सी कॉम्पलेक्स राजागोपालाचारी स्ट्रिट कृष्ण , विजयावाडा आंध्र प्रदेश

35. 6710667

21-5-2008 एम टी डी परिचालित स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्प- कारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

18-5-2007 1417: 1999

खजानाज्वेलरी प्रैवेट लि. डोर नं. 10-4-575/ए पी एम आर कॉम्पलेक्स मास्करोड चित्तूर, तिरूपती म्यूनिसिपल कार्यालय जंक्शन

आंध्र प्रदेश-517501

36. 6711568

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण 21-5-2008 एम टी डी परिचालित मिश्रधातुएं,. आभूषण/शिल्प- कारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

18-5-2007 1417 : 1999

श्री विजया वेंकटा रमणा ज्वेलरी मार्ट डोर नं. 23-1-343 , गांधी रोड ओंगोल आंध्र प्रदेश-523001

करुणा केबल्स लिमिटेड

37. 6717176

23-5-2010 एम टी डी परिचालित स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्प-

कारी शुद्धता एवं

मुहरांकन

ई टी डी परिचालित

13-6-2008

398 (भाग 4 )

18-5-2007 प्लाट नं. 102-ए श्री वेंकटेशवरा कोआपरेटिव इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट मेडक , आई डी ए, बोल्लारम (वी ) आंध्र प्रदेश-502325

38. 6709884

:1994

एल्युमीनियम मिश्रधातु के चालक ( एल्यू- मीनियममैग्नीशियम सिलिकॉन टाइप

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

20-5-2008

18-5-2007 14543: 2004

श्री वेंकटेश्वरा एन्टरप्राईजेस एनारायणपुरम विलेज अनंतपूर मंडल अनंतपूर आंध्र प्रदेश-515001

पेकेजबंद पेय

जल ( पैकेजबंद

प्राकृतिक मिनरल

जल के आलावा) 9924

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

4 39. 6712267

28-5-2007 1417: 1999

दुर्गाज्वेलरी

2-4-45 एंड 94

एम जी रोड, नियर

अप्पर ग्राउंड फ्लोर रामगोपालपेट पुलिस स्टेशण हैदराबाद, सिकंदराबाद

आंध्र प्रदेश-500003

40. 6712368 वैभव ज्वेलर्स

28-5-2007 1417: 1999

7-2-714, शाप नं. 6

पहला मंजील पॉट मार्केट हैदराबाद , सिकंदराबाद

आंध्र प्रदेश-500003

41. 6712469

28-5-2007 1417: 1999

श्री सुवर्णा मंदिर

तारानगर

शाप नं. 1-27 , रंगा रेड्डी , सेरिलिंगमाल्ली

आंध्र प्रदेश -500019

42. 6712873 भवानी वेंकटा सुब्बय्या शेट्टी 28-5-2007 1417: 1999

एंड भवानी श्री रामा मूर्ती 2/236, कल्पना सेंटर कर्नूल, नंध्याल आंध्र प्रदेश -500019

मिना गोल्ड

43. 6712974

29-5-2007 1417: 1999

7-2-711 , पॉट मार्केट

नियर मोंडा मार्केट हैदराबाद , सिकंदराबाद आंध्र प्रदेश-500003

रूप ज्वेलर्स

44. 6713067

29-5-2007 1417 : 1999

7-2-750 ,

पॉट मार्केट

हैदराबाद, सिकंदराबाद आंध्र प्रदेश-500003

45. 6716073 लॉको इंडस्ट्रिस लिमिटेड

(सीमेंट विभाग)

राचागुन्नेरी -517641 श्रीकाणहस्ति मंडल चित्तूर जिला ( एपी )

46. 6716174

29-5-2007 8112: 1989

लॉको इंडस्ट्सि लिमिटेड

(सीमेंट विभाग)

राचागुन्नेरी -517641 श्रीकाणहस्ति मंडल चित्तूर जिला ( एपी )

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 6

9 5

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण 28-5-2010 एम टी डी परिचालित मिश्रधातुएं,

आभूषण/शिल्प-

कारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण 28-5-2010 एम टी डी परिचालित मिश्रधातुएं,

आभूषण/शिल्प-

कारी शुद्धता एवं

मुहरांकन

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण 27-5-2010 एम टी डी परिचालित मिश्रधातुएं,

आभूषण/शिल्प-

कारी शुद्धता एवं

मुहरांकन

एम टी डी

29-5-2010

परिचालित मिश्रधातुएं,

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण आभूषण/शिल्प- कारी शुद्धता एवं

मुहरांकन

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण 30-5-2010 एम टी डी परिचालित मिश्रधातुएं,

आभूषण/शिल्प-

कारी शुद्धता एवं

मुहरांकन

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण 29-5-2010 एम टी डी परिचालित मिश्रधातुएं,

आभूषण/शिल्प- कारी शुद्धता एवं

मुहरांकन

सल्फेट रेसिस्टिंग 10-6-2008

29-5-2007 12330 : 1988

सी ई डी परिचालित पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

43 ग्रेड के 10-6-2008 सी ई डी परिचालित साधारण पोर्टलैंड

सीमेंट [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

4 1

47. 6720064

29-5-2007

9925

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

14543: 2004

आर एम आखवा इंडस्ट्रिस

51-980-ए, 8-3

सीपी एम कार्यालय के पीछे इंदिरा गाँधी नगर कर्नूल,

आंध्र प्रदेश-515001

48. 6714675

पैकेजबंद पेय 21-6-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित जल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

पैकेजबंद पेय 05-6-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित

14543: 2004

31-5-2007

साई गंगा फुडस एंड

बीवेरेजेस

एच नं.1-7-211/2ए दाची कॉम्पलेक्स ई सी आई एल क्रास रोड रंगा रेड्डी,

आंध्र प्रदेश-500062

49. 6713572

31-5-2007 जल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

परिचालित

14543: 2004

श्री राधावेंद्रा इंडस्ट्रि सर्वे नं. 72/2ए-2 माधावरम रोड मंत्रालयम कर्नूल, आंध्र प्रदेश

DATE : 01-08-2007

CML No.

S. No.

Licensee Name & Address

GOL Date

4 1

03-05-2007 1. 6704571 Ssiddivinayaka

Industries Sy. No. 524/4B , A.G. Nagar Madanapali Road Rayachoty-516269 KadapaDistrict Cuddapah Rayachoty Andhra Pradesh- 516269

03-05-2007 2 . 6705371

पैकेजबंद पेय

एफ ए डी

30-5-2008

जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

May 2007

Status Remarks

Division

Validity

ISNo. & Product

9 5

03-05-2008 FAD

IS 14543 : 2004

Operative

Packaged

drinkingwater (other than packaged natural mineral water)-

FAD

08-05-2008

IS 14543 : 2004

SriSathguru

Aqua Minerals

Operative

Packaged

drinkingwater

S. No 1-1C2, Behind SSS Hospital , Prasanthi Gram, Beedupalli , Anantapur Puttaparthy Andhra Pradesh- 515134

6704268

(otherthan packaged natural mineral water)-

FAD

03-05-2008

IS 14543 : 2004

Rupa Aqua Industries 03-05-2007 D. No. 17/65, Gonegandla Road Yemmiganur Kurnool Andhra Pradesh

Operative

Packaged

drinkingwater

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

9926

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 1

4. 6703569

FAD Operative Balaji Aqua Industries 03-05-2007 Patigari Street Chennur Cuddapah Andhra Pradesh

IS 14543 : 2004 03-05-2008 Packaged drinkingwater (otherthan packaged natural mineral water)

6704369

04-05-2007

FAD

03-05-2008

Operative Sai Shiva Beverages

1-5 , Behind Dholari Dhami Malakunta Bhavi ViaHakimpet, Kompally Rangareddi Andhra Pradesh- 500014

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinkingwater (other than packaged natural mineral water)

PlotNo.2, BlockNo. 63 Ameenpur Village , Patancheru Mandal Medak Andhra Pradesh- 502032

9. 6705977

IS374: 1979

13-05-2008 ETD

PraveenEngineering 04-05-2007

Operative

Electric ceiling

type fans and

regulators

Industries Plot No. 22, H. No. 5-5-252/3 Durga Shakti Peetam Colony Kukatpally Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh- 500037

07-05-2007

10. 6706070 Mahrishi Aloys

13-05-2008 CED Operative

IS 1786 : 1985 High strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement

Pvt. Ltd. Madhugiri Road ModaVillage Hindupur Anantapur Andhra Pradesh- 515212 9927 [भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1, 1929

FAD

11. 6705775

07-05-2007

09-05-2008

1914543 : 2004

Bannari Industries

Operative

Packaged

drinkingwater

(otherthan

packaged

hatural mineral

water)

D. No. 3-1 Panchayat Office Road Ganguru Vijayawada-521139 Krishna District Krishna Ganguru Andhra Pradesh 521139

FAD

21-05-2008

12. 6710566

IS 14543: 2004

07-05-2007

Operative

Packaged

drinkingwater

(otherthan

packaged

natural mineral

water)

FAD

22-05-2008

Operative 16. 6711164

14-05-2007 IS 14543: 2004

Packaged

drinkingwater

(otherthan

packaged

natural mineral

water)

R.K. Industries Sy. No. 81/1 , Mulaguntapadu- 523101 Singarayakonda Prakasam District Prakasam Mulaguntapadu Andhra Pradesh 523101

4935 G1/07-17 9928

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

water)

Sy. No. 131 , Markapur Road , Yerragundapalem Village& Mandal 523327 Prakasam District Prakasam Yerragundapalem Andhra Pradesh- 523327

17-05-2008 FAD

21. 6708983

IS14543 : 2004

Operative

14-05-2007

Vijaya Water Products Ravipadu Road Narsaraopeta Narsaraopeta Mandal Guntur District, Guntur Narsaraopeta Andhra Pradesh

Packaged

drinkingwater

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

14-05-2007

14-05-2008

IS14543: 2004

FAD Operative Aqua Tech DoorNo. 22-30 , Saipuram Colony Gollapudi Vijayawada Rural Krishna District Krishna

Packaged

drinkingwater

(other than

packaged

natural mineral

water)

Gollapudi Andhra Pradesh

26. 6706979

14-05-2008 FAD

14-05-2007 IS 14543 : 2004

Operative

Packaged

drinkingwater

(otherthan

packaged

natural mineral

water)

Sri Lakshmi Srinivasa Industries D. No. 6-99 B Satyanarayanapuram Pamur Village &Mandal- 504208 Prakasam District Prakasam Pamur Andhra Pradesh 504208

27. 6708276

14-05-2007 IS 1786: 1985

SreeBalaji

15-05-2008 CED Operative

High strength

deformed steel

bars and wires

forconcrete

reinforcement

TMT Rod Mills Sy. No. 193 A Lakshmipuram -B.Ο. A/W Ulindakonda - S.O . Aswathapuram (V) Kurnool Andhra Pradesh- 518218

28. 6708579 GoldenWorld

14-05-2007 IS 1417: 1999 16-05-2010 MTD Operative

Gold and gold

alloys, jewellery/

artefacts- fineness

andmarking

Shop No. 1-29/ 1 , Kaustubh Towers CTO Colony, Kothapet Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh 9930

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

20-05-2008 CED

IS459: 1992

14-05-2007

29. 6709783

Operative Limited

Indian Standards

corrugated and

semi-corrugated

asbestos cement

sheets

Visakha Industries Asbestos Cement Division Jujjuru Village VeerulapaduMandal Krishna Jujjuru Village Andhra Pradesh- 502300

30. 6708175

15-05-2007

Mahashiv Shakti

IS1786: 1985

15-05-2008 CED

Operativ

High strength

deformed sheet

bars and wires

for concrete

reinforcement

Steel RollingMills Pvt. Ltd. , #22-6-206 Pathergatti Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh- 500002

31. 6707072

15-05-2007 IS 12592: 2002

GPI Hyderabad

14-05-2008 CED

Operative

Precast concrete manhole cover and frame-

6-6-76B , Ring Road Kattedan Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh- 500077

32. 6709985

IS 1417: 1999 20-05-2010 MTD Operative Rajlakshmi Jewellers 18-05-2007 4-1-1978 , Abids Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh

Goldand gold

Operative

Gold and gold

alloys , jewellery/

artefacts - fineness

andmarking

Khazana Jewellery Private Limited D. No. 10-14-575/A , "PMR Complex" MosqueRoad Municipal Office Junction Chittor Tirupati Andhra Pradesh- 517501 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

18-05-2007 36. 6711568

9931

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

23-05-2010 MTD

IS1417:1999

Sri Vijaya Venkata Ramana JewelleryMart D.No. 23-1-343 , Gandhi Roa Prakasam Ongole Andhra Pradesh 523001

37. 6717176

18-05-2007 Karuna CablesLimited PlotNo. 102-A, Sri Venkateshwara Co-Op. Industrial Estate Medak IDABollaram (V) Andhra Pradesh 502325

18-05-2007 6709884

38.

Sri Venkateswara Enterprises ANarayanapuram Village Ananthapur Mandal Ananthapur Andhra Pradesh 515001

28-05-2007 39. 6712267 Durga Jewellery 2-4-45 & 94, Upper Ground Floor M.G. Road,Near Ramgopalpet Police Station Hyderabad Secunderabad Andhra Pradesh 500003

Operative

Goldandgold alloys, jewellery/ artefacts- fineness and marking-

13-06-2008 EID

IS398 :

Operative

Part4:1994 Aluminium conductors for overhead trans- mission purposes: part4aluminium alloy stranded conductors (aluminium magnesium silicon type)

20-05-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinkingwater (other than packaged naturalmineral water)-

28-05-2010 MTD Operative

IS-1417: 1999 Goldandgold alloys, jewellery/ artefacts- fineness andmarking-

28-05-2010 MTD

IS 1417: 1999

Vaibhav Jewellers

40. 6712368

28-05-2007 7-2-714, Shop No. 6 Ist Floor, Pot Market Hyderabad Secunderabad Andhra Pradesh 500003

Operative

Gold andgold alloys, jewellery/ artefacts - fineness andmarking-

27-05-2010 MTD

IS 1417: 1999

28-05-2007 41. 6712469 Shree Suwarna Mandir Shop No. 1-27, Taranagar Rangareddi SeriLingampally Andhra Pradesh 500019

28-05-2007 6712873

Bhavansi Venkata Subbaiah Shetty & Bhavanasi Sre Rama Murthy 2/326, Kalpana Centre Kurnool Nandyal Andhra Pradesh 508501

Operative

Goldandgold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts - fineness andmarking-

MTD

29-05-2010

Operative

IS 1417: 1999 Goldandgold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts - fineness andmarking- 9932

[PART II--SEC . 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

43. 6712974

29-05-2007

MTD

MeenaGold

IS 1417: 1999 30-05-2010

Operative

7-2-711 , Pot Market

Goldandgold

alloys,jewellery/

artefacts - fineness

andmarking

Near Monda Market Hyderabad Secunderabad Andhra Pradesh 500003

44. 6713067

29-05-2010

29-05-2007 IS 1417: 1999

Roop Jewellers

MTD Operative

Goldandgold

alloys, jewellery /

artefacts - fineness

andmarking

7-2-750 , Pot Market Hyderabad Secunderabad Andhra Pradesh 500003

45. 6716073

10-06-2008

Lanco Industries Ltd. 29-05-2007 IS 12330 : 1988

CED

Operative

Specification for

sulphate resisting

portland cement

Rachagunneri , Sri Kalanasti Mandal Chittor Chittor Andhra Pradesh 517641

46. 6716174

10-06-2010 CED

Lanco Industries Ltd. 29-05-2007

Operative

IS 8112 : 1989

43 grade ordinary

portland cement

Rachagunneri , SriKalanasti Mandal Chittor Chittor Andhra Pradesh 517641

47. 6720064

FAD

IS 14543 : 2004

21-06-2008

R.M. Aqua Industries 29-05-2007

Operative

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineral water)

51-980-A8-3 Besides C.P.M. Office Indira Gandhi Nagar Kurnool -518003 Kurnool Andhra Pradesh 518003

48. 6714675

05-06-2008 FAD

IS 14543 : 2004

31-05-2007

Sai Ganga Foods &

Operative

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineral water)

Beverages H. No. 1-7-211 /2A/4A, DachaComplex ECILX Road Rangareddi Andhra Pradesh 500062

31-05-2007 IS 14543 : 2004 30-05-2008 FAD

49. 6713572 Sri Raghavendra

Operative

Industry

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineral water)

Sy . No. 72/2A-2 , Madhavaram Road Mantralayam Kurnool Andhra Pradesh [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

क्रम लाईसेंस संख्या संख्या

लाईसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

स्वीकृत करने की तिथि/ वर्ष/माह

4 2

01-06-2007 1. 6713774 पयोनीर बेवरेजस 5-52-2, 6/14 , ब्राड़िपेट, गुंटूरू आन्ध्र प्रदेश

01-06-2007 2. 6713976 मारूति वाटर्स ( प्रा. ) लिमिटेड़ येर्रगुन्टारोड़ पोटलादुर्तिविलेज येर्रगुन्टामंडल , कड़पा, आ प्र.

01-06-2007 3. 6714473 श्री बालाजी ड्रिंक्स सर्वे नं: 372-2 , इनमडुगु विलेज कोष्यूरू मंडल, नेल्लरू डिस्ट्रिक्ट, आन्ध्र प्रदेश -137

4. 6716881

01-06-2007 एस एस आर आक्वा प्राडक्टस सर्वे नं: 295/बी, अडिवितक्केलापाडु विलेज गुंटूरू रूरल , गुंटूरू डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश

06-06-2007 1417: 1999

5. 6715576 श्री महॅकालि सिल्वर पैलेस

एंडज्वेलर्स 2-102/2, सेठजी कामप्लेक्स शोबना बस स्टाप के पास बालानगर , हैदराबाद आन्ध्रप्रदेश -500037

2112: 2003

06-06-2007 श्री महॅकालि सिल्वर पैलेस

6 6667591

1417 : 1999

08-06-2007 7. 6716477 पी वेंकटा मुनस्वामी सेट् िएंड सन्स 7-180, ब्राहमिन स्ट्रीट चित्तरू आन्ध्र प्रदेश -517001

1417 : 1999

08-06-2007 पूजा ज्वेलर्स

8. 6716578

7-1-572, सत्यम थियेटर रोड़ अमीरपेट, हैदराबाद आन्ध्र प्रदेश-500016

08-06-2007 1417: 1999

9. 6716679 श्री श्रीकर नवरतना ज्वेलर्स 7-1-58/1 , अमीरपेट लाल बंगलो कामप्लेक्स हैदराबाद आन्ध्र प्रदेश -500016

9933

'भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

जून 2007

विभाग

वर्ष संख्या

भारतीय मानक शीर्षक

भा मा संख्या

स्थिति स्टेटस

14543: 2004

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

31-05-2008

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ]

एफ ए डी परिचालित

31-05-2008

14543: 2004 पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा]

एफ ए डी परिचालित

14543: 2004

05-06-2008

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ]

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

13-06-2008

14543: 2004 पैकेजबंद पेय अल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल .जल के अलावा ]

परिचालित

एम टी डी

07-06-2010

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

एम टी डी परिचालित

07-06-2010

चांदी एवं चांदी मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

एम टी डी परिचालित

11-06-2010

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

परिचालित

एम टी डी

11-06-2010

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

एम टी डी परिचालित

11-06-2010

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन 9934

[PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

1 2

सी ई डी परिचालित

14-06-2008

11-06-2007

10. 6717479

1489( भाग 1 ) 1991

पोर्टलैंड पोजोलाना सीमेंट (फ्लाई ऐश आधारित)

एन सी एल इइंस्ट्रीस लि. सातवी मंजिल रागावारतना टवर्स, चिराग अलि लेन , अबिड़स हैदराबाद आन्ध्रा प्रदेश .500001

सी ई डी परिचालित

11-06-2008

11-06-2007

11. 6716275

1991 1489( भाग 1 ) पोर्टलैंड पोजोलाना सीमेंट (फलाई ऐश आधारित )

पराशक्ति सिमेन्ट इंडस्ट्रीस लिमिटेड़ जेट्टिपालेम विलेज रेन्टाचीतला मंडल गुंटूरूडिस्टिक्ट आन्ध्रा प्रदेश -522421

11-06-2007

14-06-2008 सी ई डी परिचालित 12. 6718178

1489 ( भाग 1 ) 1991

पोर्टलैंड पोजोलाना सीमेंट (फ्लाई ऐश आधारित)

अमरेशवरी सिमेन्ट इड़स्ट्रीस पेद्दवीडूविलेज नलगेन्डा, मट्द्मपल्लि मंड़ल आन्ध्राप्रदेश -508204

12269:1987 53 ग्रेड वो पी सी

11-06-2007

14-06-2008 सी ई डी परिचालित 13. 6717580 एन सी एल इइंस्ट्रीस लि. कादीम पोतारम विलेज पिनापाकापोस्ट कृष्णा, जीकोन्डुरू मंडल आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

11-06-2007 12592:2002

सी ई डी परिचालित

14-06-2008

14. 6717681

प्रीकास्ट कांक्रिट मानहोल कवर्स

किट्टु सीमेन्ट प्रडक्टस 4/8-ए, रोड़ नं: 16 आइ डी ए, नाचारम रंगारेड्डि, हैदराबाद आन्ध्रा प्रदेश -500055

4985:2000

15-06-2007

15. 6718784

18-06-2008 सी ई डी परिचालित

पैथ जल की पूर्ति के लिए असुघद्रियत पी.वी.सी. पाइप

सौधाग्या प्लास्टिक्स (प्रा ) लि. सर्वे नंः 23 , पोल्लम इन्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , जीडिमेटला कुतुबुल्लापुर मंडल रंगारेड्डि मदनापल्लि, चित्तूरू आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

14543 :2004

15-06-2007

एफ ए डी परिचालित

24-06-2008

16. 6720468

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक गिनरल जल के अलावा]

अइश्वर्या इंडस्ट्रीस सर्वे नं: 122-4/सी2 मनसूर विलेज , कावली मंडल नेल्लरू ड़ि, आन्ध्रा प्रदेश-201

15-06-2007 14543:2004

एफ ए डी परिचालित

14-06-2008

17. 6717984

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा]

श्री बालाजी इस्ट्रीस ड़ीनं: 487-16-17 पगोलु विलेज चिल्लपल्लि मंडल कृष्णा डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्राप्रदेश -521126

14543:2004

15-06-2007

एफ ए डी परिचालित 18. 6720266

21-06-2008

श्री लक्ष्मी मिनरल वाटर प्लॉट सर्वे नं 1092 ई ,

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ]

हनुमान नगर, हुनमान मंदिर के पीछे , वेल्लुला रोड मेटपल्लि, करीमनगर आन्ध्रा प्रदेश

श्री मारूति बेवेरेजस

14543 :2004

19. 6722977

15-06-2007

एफ ए डी परिचालित

01-07-2008

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक 'मिनरल जल के अलावा]

प्लाट नं: 251 , सर्वे नं 121-बी तेजा एनक्लेव , इंद्रकरण विलेज संगारेड्डि, मेदक, आन्ध्रा प्रदेश 9935

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1 2

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

24-06-2008

14543 :2004

15-06-2007

20. 6720670

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिगरल जल के अलावा]

रायल वाटर प्रसेसिंग यूनिट सर्वेनं: 561/2 बी अंड़ 2 सी महूरूपाडुविलेज कावली मंडल, नेल्लूरू आन्ध्रप्रदेश-524203

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

24-06-2008

15-06-2007 14543 :2004

21. 6720771

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरलं जल के अलावा]

तिरूमला इड़स्ट्रीस सर्वेनं: 575/1 , कोलुकुला रोड येरागोंडापालेम विलेज एवं मंडल प्रकाशम डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्रप्रदेश

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

24-06-2008

14543 :2004

15-06-2007

22. 6720872

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ]

श्री तीर्ता बेबेरेजस डीनंः 20-118, गाँधि चौक वनपर्ति, महबूबनगर आन्ध्र प्रदेश-509003

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

04-07-2008

14543 :2004

15-06-2007

23. 6724072

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा]

श्री बालाजी बेवेरेजस एंड अलैड़ प्रडक्टस सर्वे नं: 4 , अबदुल्लापुर मेट हयत नगर मंडल रंगारेड्डि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

21-06-2008

14543:2004

19-06-2007

24. 6720367

पैकेजर्जर पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ]

वंदना इंडस्ट्रीस प्लाट नं: 4 अंड 5 , सर्वे नंः 190 , लेक व्यूएनक्लेव ईश्वर डेवेलपर्स के बगल में निजामपेट रोड़ , कुकटपल्लि रंगारेड्डि , आन्ध्र प्रदेश-500072

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

21-06-2008

14543 :2004

19-06-2007

25. 6720165

पैकेजबंद पेयजल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ]

रमादेवि आक्वा इंडस्ट्रीस हेच नंः 27-171 , हमालिवाड़ा आदिलाबाद, मंचिरयाल आन्ध्र प्रदेश-504208

परिचालित

ई टी डी

18-06-2008

19-06-2007 398( भाग 2)

26. 6718481

1996

शिरोपरी प्रेषण कार्यों के लिए जस्तीकृत इस्पात

प्रबलित (भाग-2)

आर ई केबल्स अंड कनडक्टर्स (प्रा. ) लिमिटेड 25/बी , फेस 1 , आई डी ए , रंगारेड्डि, चेर्लापल्लि आन्ध्रप्रदेश -500051

अल्युमिनियम कनडक्टर्स गालवनैस्ड स्टील रिइनफोर्सड

ई टी डी

18-06-2008

19-06-2007 398(भाग 4)

27. 6718582

चिन्ह निषेध में है

1996

आर ई केबल्स अंड कनडक्टर्स (प्रा. ) लिमिटेड 25/बी, फेस 1 , आई डी ए , रंगारेड्डि , चेर्लापल्लि आन्ध्र प्रदेश -500051

शिरोपरी प्रेषण कार्यों के लिए जस्तीकृत इस्पात प्रबलित (भाग-4) मिश्रधातुके चालक अल्यूमिनियम ( मेगनिशियम) सिलिकान टाइप

परिचालित

सी ई डी

18-06-2008

13592 : 1992

19-06-2007

28. 6718683 सौबाग्या प्लास्टिक्स ( प्रा ) लि सर्वे.नं: 123

संवातन और वर्षा के पानी के तन्त्र सहित भवनोंके अन्दर की मिट्टी तथा अपशिष्ट नियवेशन तन्त्र के लिए अनम्यकृत पीवी सी पाइपों

पोल्लम इन्डस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, जीडिमेटला कुतुबुल्लापुर मंडल रंगारेड्डि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश -500055

परिचालित

सी ई डी

26-06-2008

43ग्रेड वो पी सी

8112 : 1989

19-06-2007

29. 6721066 डेक्कन सिमेन्टस लिमिटेड़ डेक्कन चेम्बर्स 6-3-666/बी , सोमाजीगुड़ा हैदराबाद , आन्ध्रा प्रदेश -082

4935 G1/07-18 9936

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/ PAUSA 1 , 1929

1 2

9 30. 6719988

14543 :2004

21-06-2007

एफ ए डी परिचालित

20-06-2008

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ]

पवन बाटलिंग सर्वे नंः 188/ए, सूरारम विलेज कुतुबुल्लापूर मंडल रंगारेड्डिआन्ध्र प्रदेश

31. 6720569

22-06-2007 14543:2004

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

24-06-2008

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ]

श्री महां नंदि बाटलिंग्स सर्वे नं: 217, 218 महूरूपाडुविलेज कावली मंडल, नेल्लूरू आन्ध्र प्रदेश -524 203

14543 :2004

32. 6649993

22-06-2007

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

11-07-2008

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ]

पीवीसी एन्टरप्राईसेस सर्वे नं: 493 तुरकापालेमविलेज गुंटूरू डिस्ट्रिक्ट, आन्ध्र प्रदेश

14543 :2004

25-06-2007

33. 6722674

01-07-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ]

मनिकंटा इंडस्ट्रीस हेच नं: 9/54 -बी, सोफियास्ट्रीट , अनंतपुर गुंटकल आन्ध्र प्रदेश -515801

25-06-2007

34. 6721167

12933:2007

एम ई ड़ी परिचालित

'सौर सपाट पट्किा संग्राहक 26-06-2008

मेसर्स सन- टेक सोलार सिस्टम्स, प्लाट नंः 31-9- 382/13/2 , पहला मंजिल ललिता कॉमप्लेक्स , कुशाईगुड़ा आर आर डि ,आ प्र -500 062

35. 6721874

25-06-2007 1417 : 1999

परिचालित

एम टी डी

28-06-2010

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

श्री गंगा ज्वेलर्स शाप नं: 3 , 7-1-621 /ए, अमीर एस्टेट , अमीरपेट हैदराबाद आन्ध्र प्रदेश-500 038

36. 6721975

25-06-2007 1417: 1999

एप टी डी परिचालित

28-06-2010

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

बाबा ज्वेलर्स 1/112, मेन बाजार कर्नूल . नंदयाल आन्ध्र प्रदेश-518 501

एम टी डो परिचालित 37. 6722068 जीवन लालज्वेलर्स

25-06-2007

28-06-2010

1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

6-2-193 आर जीवन लाल कामप्लेक्स चौ- रास्ता, वरंगल . हन्मकोन्डा आन्ध्र प्रदेश -506011

14543:2004

एफ ए डी परिचालित

08-07-2008

38. 672.5680

27-06-2007

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ]

सुजला प्यूरिफाईड़ ड्रिंकिंग वाटर प्लाट नंः 6 , साहब नगर विलेज हयतनगर , रंगारेड्डिआन्ध्र प्रदेश

परिचालित

एम टी डी

28-06-2010

39. 6722169

29-06-2007 1417: 1999 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

माता ब्वेष्नवी ज्वेलर्स शाप नंः 49,50 सी पी रेड्डिकामप्लेक्स चौ- रास्ता, वरंगल , हन्मकोन्डा आन्ध्र प्रदेश 9937 [ भाग II-खण्डे 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

Date : 01-08-2007

June 2007

S.No. CML No.

GOL Date

IS No & Product

Division

Status

Validity

Licensee Name and Address

8. 1. 6713774

01-06-2007

31-05-2008 FAD Operative Pianeer Beverages 5-52-2, 6/14 Brodipet, Guntur Guntur Andhra Pradesh - 520002

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking Water (Other than packaged natural mineral . water)

2. 6713976

01-06-2007

31-05-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking Water (Other than packaged natural mineral waler)

Maruthi Waters Pvt Ltd Yerraguntla Road Potladuthi Vill, Yerragurntia Mandal Cuddapah Andhra Pradesh

01-06-2007

05-06-2008

3. 6714473

FAD Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinking Water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

SriBalaji Drinks Sy.No. 372-2 Inamadugu Village - 52413 Kovur Mandal Nellore District Nellore Inamadugu Andhra Pradesh - 524137

01-06-2007

4. 6716881

13-06-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking Water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

S.S.R Aqua Products S.No.295/B Adavitakkellapadu Village Guntur Rural Guntur District Guntur Adavitakkellapadu Andhra Pradesh

5. 6715576

07-06-2010 MTD Operative

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold alloys jewellery/artefacts fineness and marking

Sri Mahankali Silver Palace 06-06-2007 & Jewellers 2-102/2 , Setji Complex Near Shobana Bus Stop Balanagar Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh- 500047

07-06-2010

6. 6715677

06-06-2007

MTD Operative

IS 2112 :2003 Silver and Silver alloys jewellery/artefacts fineness and marking

Sri Mahankali Silver Palace & Jeweliers 2-102/2 , Setji Complex Near Shobana Bus Stop Balanagar Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh 500047

08-06-2007

MTD

11-06-2010

7. 6716477

Operative

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold alloys jewellery/artefacts fineness and marking

P. Venkata Munaswamy Chetty & Sons 7-180 , Brahmin Street Chittor, Chittoor Andhra Pradesh-

11-06-2010 . MTD

08-06-2007

8. 6716578

Operative

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold alloys jewellery/artefacts- fineness and marking

Pooja Jewellers 7-1-572 , Satyam Theatre Road Ameerpet Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh- 500016

9. 6716679

08-06-2007

11-06-2010 MTD Operative

IS 1417 :1999

Gold andGold alloys

jewellery/artefacts

fineness and marking

Sri Sreekar Navaratna Jewellers 7-1-58/ 1 , Ameerpet Opp: Lal Bunglow Complex Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh- 500016 9938

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1,1929

8 10. 6717479

CED

11-06-2007

14-06-2008

Operative

IS 1489 :Part 1 : 1991 Portmand pozzolana Cement part 1 flyash based

NCL Industries Limited 7th Floor Raghavaratna Towers , Chirag Ali , Lane, Hyderabad Abids Andhra Pradesh 500001

11. 6716275

11-06-2007

11-06-2008 CED Operative

IS 1489 Part 1 : 1991 Portland pozzolana Cement part 1 flyash based

Parasakti Cement Industries Ltd Jettipalem Village Rentachitala Mandal Guntur District, Guntur Andhra Pradesh 522421

12. 6718178

11-06-2007

14-06-2008 CED

Operative

IS 1489 :Part 1 : 1991 Portland pozzolana Cement part 1 flyash based

Amcreshwari Cements Limited Pedaveedu Village Nalgonda Mattampally Mandal Andhra Pradesh 508204

11-06-2007

14-06-2008

13. 6717580

CED Operative

IS 12269 : 1987

53 grade ordinary

portland Cement

NCL Industries Limited Kadim potaram Village , pinapaka Post, Krishna G Kondur Mandal Andhra Pradesh

14. 6717681

11-06-2007

14-06-2008 CED

Operative

IS 12592 : 2002 Precast Concrete Manhole Cover and frame-

Kittu Cement Products 4/8-A, Road No.16 IDA, Nacharam Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh

15. 6718784

15-06-2007

18-06-2008 CED

Operative

IS 4985 : 2000 Unplasticized pvc pipes for portable water supplies-

Sowbhagya Plastics (P) Limited Sy.No. 123 , Pollam Industria Estate Jeedimetla Qutbullapur (M) Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh 500055

16. 6720468

15-06-2007

24-06-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinking Water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

Aiswarya Industries S.No. 122-4/C2 Musunur Village- 524201 Kavali Mandal Nellore District Nellore Musunar Village Andhra Pradesh 524201

17. 6717984

15-06-2007

14-06-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking Water ( Other than packaged natural mineral water)

Sri Balaji Industries D.No.487-16-17 Pagolu Village Chillapally Mandal Krishna District Krishna Pagolu Andhra Pradesh - 521126

15-06-2007

18. 6720266

21-06-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking Water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

Sri Laxmi Mineral Water Plant Sy. No. 1092 /E Hanuman Nagar, Behind Hanuman Temple , Vellulla Road, Karimnagar Andhra Pradesh

15-06-2007

19. 6722977

01-07-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking Water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

Sri Maruthi Beverages Plot No.251 , Sy . No. 121 -B Teja Enelave Indarakaran Village , Sangareddy Medak Andhra Pradesh [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

4 1

20. 6720670

15-06-2007 Royal Water Processing Unit Sy , No.561 /2B & C Maddurupadu Village-524203 Kavali Mandal Nellore District Nellore Maddurupadu Andhra Pradesh -524203

21. 6720771

15-06-2007

9939

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

24-06-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking Water ( Other than packaged natural mineral water)

24-06-2008 FAD

IS 14543 : 2004

Operative

Packaged drinking

Water (Other than

packaged

natural mineral water)

Thirumalla Industries Sy, No.575/ 1 Kolukula Road Yeragondapalem Village & Mandal Prakasam District Prakasam Yerragondapalem Andhra Pradesh

22. 6720872

15-06-2007 Sree Teertha Beverages Door No. 20-118 , Ghandh Chouck Wanaparthy Mahbubnagar Andhra Pradesh-509003

15-06-2007 23. 6724072 Sri Balaji Beverages & Allied Products Sy.No.4 , Abdullapur met Hayatnagar Mandal Rangareddi Andhra Pradesh

19-06-2007 24. 6720367 Vandana Idustries Plot No.4&5 , Sy . No.190 , Lake View Enclave Beside Eswar Developers , Nizampet Road Kukatpally Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh -500072

25. 6720165

19-06-2007 Ramadevi Aqua Industries H. No.27-171 , Hamaliwada, Adilabad Mancherial Andhra Pradesh- 504208

26. 6718481

19-06-2007 R.E. Cables & Conductors Pvt. Ltd 25/B , Phase No.1 , I.D.A, Rangareddi Cherapally, Andhra Pradesh-500051

19-06-2007 27. 6718582 R.E. Cables & Conductors Pvt. Ltd. 25/B , Phase No.1 , 1.D.A, Rangareddi Chelapally, Andhra Pradesh- 500051

28. 6718683

19-06-2007 Sowbhagya Plastics (P) Limited Sy.No. 123 Pollam industrial Estate Jeedimetla, Qutbullapur (M) Rangareddi Andhra Pradesh- 500055

24-06-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinking Water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

04-07-2008

FAD

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking Water ( Other than packaged natural mineral water)

21-06-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking Water ( Other than packaged natural mineral water)

21-06-2008

FAD Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking Water ( Other than packaged natural mineral water)

18-06-2008 ETD Operative

IS 398 :Part 2 : 1996 Aluminium Condutcors for overhead transmission purposes: part 2 aluminium conductors , galvanized steel reinforced

18-06-2008 ETD

Under Stop Marking

IS 398 :Part 4: 1994 Aluminium Condutors for overhead transmission purposes: part 4 aluminium alloy stranded conductors (aluminium magnesium silicon type)

18-06-2008 CED

Operative

IS 13592 : 1992 Upvc pipes for soil and waste discharge systems inside buildings including ventilation and rain- water system 9940

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

4 29. 6721066

19-06-2007

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 5

26-06-2008 CED Operative

IS 8112 1989

43 grade ordinary

portland Cement

Deccan Cements Limited Deccan Chambers 6-3-666/B Somajiguda Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh- 500082

30. 6719988

21-06-2007 PavanBottling Sy.No.188/A , Suraram Village Qutbullapur Mandal Rangareddi Andhra Pradesh

31 6720569

22-06-2007 Sei Mahanandi Bottlings Sy.No.217,218 Maddurupadu Village -524 203 Kavali Mandal Nellore District Nellore Maddurupadu Village Andhra Pradesh - 524203

32: 6726480

22-06-2007 PVS Enterprises Sy.No.493/ 1 Turkapalem Village Guntur District Guntur Turkapalem Village Andhra Pradesh

33. 6722674

25-06-2007 Manikanta Industries H. No. 9/ 54 -B Sofia Street Anantapur Guntakal Andhra Pradesh- 515801

34. 6721167

25-06-2007 Sun-Tech Solar Systems Plot No. 1-9-382/ 13/2 1st Floor , Lalitha Complex Near Navkiran Industrial Estate Kushaiguda Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh 500062

35 6721874

25-06-2007 Sri Ganga Jewellers Shop No.3 , 7-1-621 / A Ameer Estate Ameerpet Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh- 500038

36. 6721975

25-06-2007 Baba Jewellers 1/112 , Main Bazar Kurnool Nandyal Andhra Pradesh - 518501

25-06-2007 37. 6722068 Jeewan Lal Jewellers 6-2-193 R.Jeevan Lal Complex Chowrasta Warangal Hanmakonda Andhra Pradesh - 506011

27-06-2007 31 6725680 Sujala Purified Drinking Water Plot No.6 , Saheb Nagar ( V) Hayatnagar Rangareddi Andhra Pradesh

20-06-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking Water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

24-06-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking Water (Other than packaged natural mineral water )

11-07-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water )

01-07-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water )

26-06-2008 MED Operative

IS 12933 : Part 1 :200 Solar flat plate collector-: part 1 requirements

MID

28-06-2010

Operative

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts fineness and marking

MTD

28-06-2010

Operative

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold alloys jewellery/ artefacts fineness and marking

28-06-2010 MTD Operative

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold andGold alloys jewellery/ artefacts fineness and marking

08-07-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking Water (Other than packaged natural mineral water) 9941 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 22, 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

29-06-2007

39. 6722169

MTD

IS 1417 : 1999

28-06-2010

Matha Vyshnavi Jewellers

Operative Shop No.49,50

C.P.Reddy Complex

Chowrasta

Gold and Gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts fineness and marking

Warangal Hanmakonda

Andhra Pradesh

जुलाई 2007

विभाग

वर्ष संख्या

भा मा संख्या भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

क्रम लाईसेंस संख्या संख्या

लाईसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

स्थिति स्टेटस

स्वीकृत करने की तिथि/ वर्ष/भाह

1 2

03-07-2007 1417: 1999

एम टी डी परिचालित

03-07-2010

1. 6723676

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवंमुहरांकन

मुसद्दिलाल एंड सन्स ज्वेलर्स 883/2जी/3 ए, टोपाज अमृता हिल्स, पंजागुट्य हैदराबाद आन्ध्र प्रदेश-500082

03-07-2007 1417:1999

एम टी डी परिचालित 2. 6723777

03-07-2010

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

आनन्द पेरल्स एंड ज्वेलर्स ए-8 , मयूर कुशाल कामप्लेक्स आबिडस, हैदराबाद आन्ध्र प्रदेश-500001

14543: 2004

03-07-2007

एफ ए डी परिचालित

08-07-2008

3. 6725781

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ]

आदित्या प्राडक्ट्स डी नं. 19/200 बेतावेलु, गुड़िवाड़ा कृष्णा आन्ध्र प्रदेश -521301

03-07-2007 14543: 2004

4. 6725983

08-07-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा]

के वी एम पैकेजड़ ड्रिंकिंग वाटर सर्वे नं. 775, वोल्डस्टेट बैंकस्ट्रीट , वंजमूर विलेज एंड मंडल, नेल्लूरुडिस्टिक्ट, आन्ध्र प्रदेश

14543: 2004

05-07-2007

परिचालित

एफ ए डी

05-07-2008

5. 6724678

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ]

श्री साईं इंडस्ट्रीस प्लाट नं. 120 , शांति एस्टंट , मंडिगरि विलेज, आदोनिमंडल , कर्नूल आन्ध्र प्रदेश-518301

3854 : 1997

ई टी डी परिचालित

05-07-2007

12-07-2008

6. 672678.3

स्विचेस फर डोमस्टिक एंड सिमिलर परपोसस

प्रशांति इंडस्ट्रीस हेच नं. 5-52/2 , फतेनगर रंगारेड्डि, हैदराबाद आन्ध्र प्रदेश-500018

ई टी डी परिचालित

374 : 1979

15-07-2008

05-07-2007

7. 6727280

छत के बिजली के पंखे और रेगुलेटर्स

मारुति उ‌द्योग 5-35/275 ए/दुर्गा शक्ति- अपीठम कालोनि कुकटपल्लि, रंगारेड्डि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश-500072

05-07-2007

53 ग्रेङ वो पी सी

सी ई डी परिचालित 8. 6726682

12269 : 1987

12-07-2008

मचिरयाल सिमेन्ट को (प्रा.) लि. मंचिरयाल सिमेन्ट वर्क्स आदिलाबाद , आन्ध्र प्रदेश-504209 9942

[PART 11--SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

14543: 2004

9. 6726278

11-07-2007

एफ ए डी परिचालित

11-07-2008

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जलके अलावा]

श्री कैलासा कोना एन्टर प्राइसेस वीवर्स कालोनि , अरनयमगंदरीग पोसट नारायणवनममं, चित्तूरु डिस्ट्रिक्ट आन्ध्र प्रदेश

11-07-2007 14543: 2004

10. 6726985

15-07-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ]

ज्योति फूड एंड बेवेरेजस प्लाटनं . 14, 15 , 18 , 195 इन्ड. एस्टेट , जनगांव वरंगल आन्ध्रप्रदेश

11. 6727886

17-07-2007 1417:1999

17-07-2010 एम टी डी परिचालित

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

हीरालालज्वेलर्स शाप नं. 5 सी पी रेड्डि कामप्लेक्स, चौरास्ता, वरंगल हनमकोन्डा आन्ध्र प्रदेश-506001

17-07-2007 1417:1999

17-07-2010 एम टी डी परिचालित 12. 6727987

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

टंगटूरु सदाशिवय्या सन्स ज्वेलर्स, डी नं. 9/1 , मेन बाजार अनंतपूर, ताडपत्रि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश -515411

13. 6728080

17-07-2007 1417:1999

17-07-2010 एम टी डी परिचालित

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

पदमज्वेलरी 7-54, गोविंद राज मुदली ट्रिट रेणीगूंटा, आन्ध्रा प्रदेश-517520

1417 : 1999

14. 6728181

17-07-2007

19-07-2010 एम टी डी परिचालित

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

मेनाका ज्वेलर्स शाप नं 4 , चौरस्ता वारंगल , हन्माकोंडा , आन्ध्र प्रदेश -506011

17-07-2007 1417 : 1999

17-07-2010 एम टी डी परिचालित 15. 6728282

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

सूरजभान ज्वेलर्स 5-8-623 , अबिद रोड हैदराबाद, आन्ध्रप्रदेश -500001

23-07-2007 14543: 2004

16. 6731978

29-07-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा]

नयागरा आखवा इंडस्ट्रीज सर्वे नं. 9 , मल्कापुर ( वी) , करीमनगर, रामागुंडम मंडल, आन्ध्र प्रदेश

17. 6730572

23-07-2007 14543 : 2004

24-07-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा]

महादेव श्रीगोपाल एंड कम्पनी डोर नं. 5-13/1/2 , सर्वे नं. 176, विश्वानाथपेट , आदिलाबाद , निर्मल , आन्ध्र प्रदेश

24-07-2007 14543 : 2004

24-07-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित 18. 6730673

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ]

एस के मिनरल्स डोर नं. 19-4-279/0/ 77/5/2 निया मिर आलाम टैंक , रंगा रेड्डी, आन्ध्र प्रदेश-500052

25-07-2007 14543: 2004

19. 6730774

24-07-2008 एफ ए डी परिचालित

पैकेजबंद पेय जल [पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ]

भरत इंडस्ट्रीस डोर नं. 9-3-12 वी आर आर टैंकरोड, बालाजीरावपेटा नियर पोलेरम्मा टेम्पल , ओंगोल , प्रकासम जिला आन्ध्र प्रदेश 9943 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

9 1 2

26-07-20107 1417 : 1999

एम टी डी परिचालित 20. 6730976 दिनेश ज्वेलर्स

29-07-2010

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

पं-19 एंड 20 मयूर कुशल कॉम्पलेक्स गनफाउंडी, हैदराबाद, आन्ध्रप्रदेश -506011

चौधरी ज्वेलर्स एंड

1417 : 1999

एम टी डी परिचालित 26-07-2007

26-07-2010

21. 6731069

सिल्वर पैलेस

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आंभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

32-37 , नियर मोंडा मार्केट , शापूर नगर, आई डीए जिडिमेट्ला, रंगा रेड्डी, अन्ध्रि प्रदेश -500055

[फा. सं. सी एम डी-13 : 11 ]

ए. के. तलवार , उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर ) Date : 01-08-2007

July 2007

CIOL Date

IS No & Product

Status

Division

Validity

S.No. CML No. Licensee Name and Address

03-07-2010 MTD

03-07-2007

1. 6723676

Operative

IS 1417 :1999 Gold and Gold alloy, jewellery/ artefacts fineness and marking

Musaddilal & Sons Jewellers 883/20/ 3A , Topaz Amrutha Hills , Punjagutta Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh - 500082

03-07-2010 MTD

03-07-2007

2. 6723777

Operative

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts fineness and marking

Anand Pearls & Jewellers A-8, Mayur Kushal Complex Abids Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh - 500001

08-07-2008

03-07-2007

FAD

3. 6725781

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking Water (Other than packaged nalural mineral water)

Aditya Products D. No. 19/200 Bethavolu , Gudivada 521 301 Krishna Gudivada, Andhra Pradesh- 521301

08-07-2008 FAD Operative 4. 6725983

03-07-2007 IS $4543: 2004 Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

KVM Packaged Drinking Water Sy. No.775 , Old State Bank Street, Vinjamur Village & Mandal Nellore, District Nellore Vinjamur , Andhra Pradesh

FAD

Operative

05-07-2007

05-07-2008

5. 6724678

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking Water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

Sri Sai Industries Plot No.120, Shanti Estate, Mandigeri Village, Adoni Mandal , Kurnool Andhra Pradesh- 518301

12-07-2008 ETD Operative

05-07-2007

6. 6726783

IS 3854 : 1997

Switches for domestic

and similar purposes

Prasanthi , Industries H.No. 5-52/2 , Fathenagar Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh - 500018

4935 GI/07-19 9944

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

05-07-2007 7. 6727280

[PART 11-SEC : 3 ( ii) ] 5

8 15-07-2008 ETD Operative

IS 374 : 1979

Electric ceiling type fans

and regulators

Maruti Udyog 5-35/ 275/A Durga Shakti Peetham Colony, Kukatpally, Rangareddi , Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh - 500072

8. 6726682

05-07-2007 12-07-2008 CED Operative

IS 12269 : 1987

53 grade ordinary

portland cement

Mancherial Cement Company Pvt . Ltd. Mancherial Cement Works , PO -MCW, Mancherial , Adilabad, Mancherial , Andhra Pradesh - 504209

9. 6726278

11-07-2007 Sri Kailasa Kona Enterprises Weavers Colony Aranyamkandriga Post Narayanavanam Mandal Chittoor District Chittor , Puttur Andhra Pradesh

10. 6726985

11-07-2007 Joythi Foods & Beverages Plot No.14,15 & 18,19 Industrial Estate( expansion) Jangaon ( V &M ) , Warangal Andhra Pradesh

17-07-2007 11. 6727886 Hecralat Jewellers Shop No.5 , C.P.Reddy, Complex Chowrastha , Warangal , Hanmakonda , Andhra Pradesh - 506001

17-07-2007 12. 6727987 Tanguturu Sadasivaiah Son Jewellers D.No.9/1 , Main Bazar , Anantapur, Tadipatri , Andhra Pradesh - 515411

17/07/2007 13. 6728080 Padam, Jewellery 4-54, Govindaraj Mudali Street , Renigunta, Chittor Renigunta, Andhra Pradesh -517520

17/07/ 14. 6728181 Menaka Jewellers Shop No. 4 , Chowrastha. Warangal Hanmakonda, Andhra Pradesh - 5060II

15. 6728282

17-07-2007 Suraj Bhan Jewellery 5-8-623 , Abid Road, Hyderabad , Andhra Pradesh - 500001

16. 6731978

23-07-2007 Nayagar Aqua Industries Sy.No. 9 , Malkapur(V) , Karimnagar , Ramagundaın Mandal , Andhra Pradesh

17. 6730572

23-07-2007 Mahadev Srigopal & Company D..No . 5-13/ 1/2, Sy . Nn.176 , Vishwanathpet, Adilabad Nirmal , Andhra Pradesh

18. 6730673

24-07-2007 S.K. Minerals D. No.19-4-279/ Α/77/ 5/2 Near Meeralam Tank , Rangareddi Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh - 500052

11-07-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinking Water ( Other than packaged natural mineral water)

15-07-2008 FAD Operative

IS 14543 : 2004 Packaged drinking Water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

17-07-2010 MTD Operative

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold alloys jewellery/ artefacts fineness and marking

17-07-2010 MTD Operative

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold alloys jewellery/artefacts fineness and marking

17-07-2010 MTD Operative

IS 1417: 1999 Gold and Gold alloys jewellery/artefacts fineness and marking

MTD

19-07-2010

Operative

IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold alloys jewellery/ artefacts fineness and marking

17-07-2010 MTD Operative

IS 1417 1999 Gold and Gold alloys jewellery/ artefacts fineness and marking

29-07-2008 FAD

Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water ( other than packaged natural mineral water)

24-07-2008

FAD Operative

IS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water ( Other than packaged natural mineral water)

24-07-2008 FAD Operative

iS 14543 2004 Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural mineral water) [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

4 2

19. 6730774

25-07-2007 Bharath Industries

9945

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

24-07-2008 FAD

IS 14543: 2004

Operative

Packaged drinking

water (other than

packaged natural

mineral water)

D..No.9-3-12 (B) , R.R. Tank Road, Balajiraopeta, Near Poleramma Temple , Ongole Prakasam District, Prakasam, Ongole Andhra Pradesh

20. 6730976

26-07-2007 Dinesh Jewellers A- 19&20 , Mayur Kushal complex, Gunfoundry, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh -500001

21. 6731069

26-07-2007 Choudhary Jewellers & SilverPalace

32-37, New Market Road, Shapur Nagar, IDA, Jeedimetla, Rangareddi, Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh -500055

29-07-2010

IS 1417 : 1999

MTD Operative

Gold andGold alloys jewellery/artefacts fineness and marking

26-07-2010 MTD

IS 1417 : 1999

Operalive

Goldand Gold alloys jewellery/artefacts fineness and marking

[F. No. CMD- 13 : 11 ] A. K. TALWAR, Dy. Director General (Marks)

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 19 दिसम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3566.- भारत सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मैसर्स रिलायन्स इण्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड की आन्ध्र प्रदेश में संरचनाओं से गुजरात राज्य में नवसारी जिले के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए मैसर्स रिलायन्स गैस ट्रान्सपोर्टेशन इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा काकीनाडा- हैदराबाद- अहमदाबाद गैस पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और भारत सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , भारत सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है; इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री वी.आइ. गोहिल , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मैसर्स रिलायन्स गैस ट्रान्सपोर्टेशन इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड , पाइपलाइन परियोजना, आनन्द महल अपार्टमेंट, आनन्द महल रोड , अडाजन , सूरत-395009 , गुजरात राज्य को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

तहसील: नवसारी

जिला: नवसारी गांव का नाम

सर्वे नम्बर/ब्लॉक नं.

85*

1. ओनची

84*

अनुसूची

राज्य: गुजरात

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल

चो.मी हेक्टेयर

एयर

5 00

41 00

50 *का.आ. 3032 दिनांक 16-11-2004 में 3 ( 1 ) की अधिसूचना का अतिरिक्त क्षेत्रफल । 9946

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

79/ब* 1. ओनची-(जारी )

77*

346* 2. मोलधरा

342*

360*

367*

361*

362

359

363*

450*

451*

460*

565* तहसील : नवसारी

जिला: नवसारी गांव का नाम

सर्वे नम्बर/ब्लॉक नं.

2 1

1. उदाच

1594**

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

5 3

87 00

17 00

01 00

16 00

86 00

00 00

73 00

12 00

राज्य : गुजरात

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल हेक्टेयर

चो.मी

एयर

5 00

67 *का.आ. 3032 दिनांक 16-11-2004 में 3 ( 1 ) की अधिसूचना का अतिरिक्त क्षेत्रफल ।

* *का. आ. 1377 ( अ ) दिनांक 06-08-2007 में 3 ( 1 ) की अधिसूचना का अतिरिक्त क्षेत्रफल ।

[फा. सं. एल-14014/39/2004-जी.पी. ]

के.के. शर्मा, अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi , the 19th December , 2007

S.O. 3566. -Whereas it appears to Government of India that it is necessary in public interest that for transportation ofnatural gas from structures in Andhra Pradesh ofM/ s . Reliance Industries Limited, Kakinada-Hyderabad-Uran -Ahmedabad gas pipeline should be laid by M/ s . Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited, to various consumers of District Navsari in the State of Gujarat ;

Andwhereas it appears to the Government of India that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to Acquire the Right of User in Land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 ofthe Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the Right of User therein ;

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

9947

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22, 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty -one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 ofthe said Act , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the Right of User therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri V. I. Gohil, Competent Authority, M/s , Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited, Pipeline Project, Anand Mahal Apartment, Anand Mahal Road , Adajan , Surat - 395009 , Gujarat.

Tehsil : Navsari

District : Navsarį

Survey No./BlockNo.

Name ofthe Village

85* 1. Onachi

84*

79/B*

77* 2 Moldhara

346*

342*

360*

367*

361*

362

359

363*

450*

451*

460*

565* Tehsil: Gandevi

District: Navsari

Survey No./BlockNo.

Name ofthe Village

2 1

1594* 1. Undach

* Additional Area to 3 ( 1 ) Notification S.O. 3032, Dated 16-11-2004.

** Additional Area to 3 ( 1 ) Notification S.O. 1377 (E), Dated 06-08-2007.

SCHEDULE

State: Gujarat

Area tobe acquired for RoU

Hectare

Are

Sq.m.

State:Gujarat

Area to be acquired for RoU

Are

Hectare

Sq.m.

[F. No. L-14014/39/2004-G.P]

K. K. SHARMA, Under Secy .

9948

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर, 2007

का.आ. 3567.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एन. टी . पी. सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 2 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 96/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/106/2003 - आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ]

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT New Delhi , the 26th November, 2007 S.O. 3567. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. No. 96/2003 ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. 2 , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of M/ s . National Thermal Power Corporation . Ltd. , and their workman , received by the Central Government on 26-11-2007 .

[No. L-42012/106/2003 - IR ( CM- 11 ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

MINISTRY OF LABOUR

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, NEW DELHI

Presiding Officer : R. N. RAI

I.D. No. 96/2003

IN THE MATTER OF :

Shri Jagdish Chander,

S/o Late Shri Deepchand, R/oVill& Post Jharodakalan ,

NewDelhi - 110072 .

VERSUS

The Chairman,

M/s. National Thermal Power Corpn . Ltd. , (Badarpur Division)

New Delhi - 110044.

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 42012/ 106/2003 [ IR (CM - II) ] Central Government Dated 16-6-2003 hasreferredthe following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder:--

"Whether the action of the management of Badarpur Thermal Power Station/National Thermal Power Corpora- tion, NewDelhi in terminating the services of Shri Jagdish Chander, SecurityGuard w.e.f. 23-12-96 is legal and justi- fied? Ifnot, towhat reliefhe is entitled to?"

The workman applicant has filed claim statement. In the claim statement it has been stated that the workman above namedwas working with the management as Secu

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] rity Guard at Badarpur Division having employment No. 51585 since 23-10-1973 . The workman was confirmed and got the status of permanent employee .

That the workman was performing his duties with utmost sincerely, diligently and with dedication and no complaint regarding his work was ever made by the management during his whole tenure of service.

That the workman was stabbed by some miscreant person due to which he had to apply for medical leave w.e.f. 10-11-96 to 23-12-96. 24th & 25th December , being suffix holidays , workman reported duty on 26-12-96 . The workman submitted a medical certificate issued by Govt . dispensary at the time of reporting for duty but he was not allowed to join duties by the management .

That the workman met the senior officers when he was not allowed to join duties , but they also did not allow him tojoin duties . He was asked to come on the following day ; he was again not allowed duties when he reported on the next day.

That the workman was shocked to know that his services have been terminated by the management w.e.f. 23-12-96without assigning sufficient reason . The letter for termination of service was received by the workman under protest on 2-1-97.

That the workman preferred an appeal vide appeal dt. 15-1-97 through UPC before GM , NTPC against the order of termination ofhis services . The appeal ofworkman dt . 15-1-97 still remains undecided and the management has chosen not to dispose of it even after lapse of more than sufficient time required for disposal of such representation . The workman vide letterdt . 14-7-97 requested to dispose of his earlier representation dated . 15-1-97 wherein he had appealed to the GM for revocation oforder of termination of his services .

That subsequently the workman served a legal notice through his counsel Shri Jati Ram wherein the management was called upon to amicably settle the matter and revoke the order of termination of service and to pay the back wages and take the workman on duty with continuity of service within a fortnight from the receipt of the notice . The noticedt . 24-7-2000 was sent through Registered AD which was duly served , but the management did not consider the right and just demand of the workman .

The order of termination is self explanatory and it does not call any repetition here . It is not based on any reasons and principles of natural justice were violated as the workman was not given any proper and reasonable opportunity of being heard . Though its foundation is misconduct, but there was no enquiry about the same .

That the order oftermination is bad in law and cannot stand in ajudicial scrutiny . It is liable to be set aside and the workman is entitled to be reinstated with full backwages and continuity of service. The workman is unemployed since his illegal termination . He could not get alternative [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

gainful employment despite his best efforts and is ready to serve the management . The workman served a legal notice dt . 19-5-2001 which is in continuation of his earlier representations .

That Shri R. K. Sharma, Personnel Officer, who looked after the security section independently was biased against the workman because he had made a complaint against him on 23-4-94 through the union on account of his high handedness , hence the present termination of his revenge.

TheManagement has filed written statement. In the written statement it has been stated that the present reference has been made by the appropriate Government in a route and mechanical manner without application of mind, therefore the present reference is liable to be rejected.

That the reference has been made after long gap of about 7 years . The workman did not make any effort to approach the conciliation officer and has raised the dispute after great delay and the same is tiable to be rejected on this ground. The workman is guilty of latches as such the present staternent of claim is liable to be rejected on this ground itself.

That reference has been made after long gap of about 7 years . The workman did not make any effort to approach the conciliation officer and has raised the dispute after delay and the same is liable to be rejected on this ground. The workman is guilty of latches as such the present statement of claim is liable to be rejected on this ground itself.

9949

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22, 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

management by which the workman was deemed to have abandoned the services of the respondent.

That the workman has not mentioned the fact that the workman had filed a Civil Writ Petition No. 3954/2000 before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi challenging the order ofthe management by which he was deemed to have abandoned the services and the same was dismissed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi. The workman has not disclosed the vital information of the filing of the writ petition before the Hon'ble High Court and its dismissal and as such the present claim ofthe workman is liable to be rejected.

It is submitted that the workman initially joined Central Electricity Authority (CEA) as Security Guard w.e.f. 23-10-73 and was absorbed in NTPC with effect from 1-4-78 on his absorption in NTPC with effect from 1-4-78 the services ofthe workman were governed by the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 initially Model Standing Orders and later on Certified Standing Orders, Leave Rules and other Rules applicable from time to time. Theworkman was deemed to have voluntarily abandoned the services of the respondent corporation without as per clause 12 of Certified Standing Orders and clause 25 of Leave Rules of the Corporation . The order of the management was communicated vide letter dated 23-12-1996 .

That the contents of para No. 2 of the claim petition arewrong and denied. It is denied that the workman was performing his duties sincerely, diligently and with dedication. It is further denied that there were no complains madeby the management regarding his work done during his whole tenure of service . The service record of the workman from the beginning of his service with Central ElectricityAuthority has been full of unauthorized absence and misconduct on various counts; the details ofthe same aregivebelow:

YEAR PERIOD OF UNAUTHORISED ABSENCE 1993 152Days

1994 119 Days

1995

182Days

1996

119 Days till 23-12-96

Thatthe workman initiallyjoined as Security Guard w.e.f. 23-10-73 with Central Electricity Authority and was absorbed in NTPC with effect from 1-4-78 when the inanagement ofBadarpur Thermal Power Station was given byGovernment to N.T.P.C. on his absorption in NTPC with effect from 1-4-78 the services of the workman were governed by the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 initially Model Standing Orders and later on Certified Standing orders , Leave Rules and other Rules applicable from time to time . The workman was deemed to have voluntarily abandoned the services ofthe respondent corporation without notice as per clause 12 of Certified Standing Orders and clause 25 of Leave Rules of the Corporation as applicable to the workman . The relevant clauses of the Certified Standing Orders and Leave Rules are annexed herewith as Annexure I + II resp . The action was taken by the management against the workman for his misconduct ofbeing unauthorized absences from duty w.e.f. 10-11-1996 and not responding to the respondent corporation's letters . After taking into consideration the workman's past record and letters issued to him twice, thereby calling upon him to join the duty iminediately or he shall be treated as unauthorized absent from duty . The order of the management was communicated vide letter dated 23-12-1996 . The workman has miserably failed tomake out any ground for challenging the action of the Theworkmen again unauthorizedly absented himself from duty with effect from 10-11-96 . The workman was issued two letters asking for joining the duty immediately . The workman despite the receipt of the said letters did not respond and failed to join the duty . Therefore the management was left with no other option but to deem that the workman is no more interested in the services and he has continuously absented himself from 10-11-96 and the workman was deemed to have the voluntary abandoned the services of corporation without notice as per clause 12 ofthe certified standing orders and clause 25 of the leave rules ofthe NTPC applicable to the workman . The workman 9950

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

course. The workman after having come to know the order dated 23-12-1996 has cooked up the story ofhis illness .

was intimated about the abandonment of services vide order dated 23-12-96 . And as such at a much belated stage the workman cannot be allowed to raise the grievances which are nothing but afterthought and an attempt to harass the management . The reference order is absolutely bad in law and is liable to be rejected .

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder . In the rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement . The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement.

Evidence of both the parties has been taken.

Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.

It is denied that the workman was stabbed by somebody and for that he had to remain on medical leave as alleged w.e.f. 10-11-1996 to 23-12-1996 . It is denied that workman reported for duty on 26-12-1996 and was not allowed to join duty by the management . It is submitted that the story cooked up by the workman is false , frivolous and after thought . The workman unauthorizedly absented from duty w.e.f. 10-11-1996 and neither joined the duty nor responded to the management's letters and the workman was deemed to have voluntarily abandoned the services ofthe Corporation . It is submitted that no intimation about the alleged ailment whatsoever was given by the workman till the passing of the order dated 23-12-1996 . The workman after having come to know about the order dated 23-12-1996 cooked up the story ofhis illness .

Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that he was a confirmed employee . He has got the status of permanent employee . He was stabbed by some miscreant person due to which he has to apply for medical leave w.e.f. 10-11-1996 to 23-12-1996 , 24th and 25th being suffix holidays . The workman reported for duty on 26-12-1996 . He submitted a medical certificate issued by Government Dispensary at the time of reporting for duty but he was not allowed to join duty by the management . The services of the workman have been illegally terminated by the managementgement w.e.f. 23-12-1996 without assigning sufficient reasons . The workman was not given any reasonable and proper opportunity of being heard.

It isdenied that the workman met the senior officers and that he was not allowed tojoin the duties as alleged or that he was asked to come on the following day . It is submitted that the allegations are false and cooked up .

Itwas submitted from the side of the management thatreference has been made after a long gap of7 years . It istime barred.

It is denied that the service of the workman was deemed to have voluntary abandoned without assigning sufficlent reasons as alleged . The letter dated 23-12-1996 issued by the Disciplinary Authority gives detailed reasons and the workman has not controverted the reasons given therein . The order was passed on 23-12-1996 by the Disciplinary Authority and the workman was intimated the abandorlment of the services vide letter dated 23-12-96 and the said order was dispatched in due course . The workman after having come to know the order dated 23-12-1996 has cooked up the story ofhis illness .

Itwas further submitted that the workman was deemed to have voluntarily abandoned the services ofthe respondent Corporation without notice as per clause 12 of the Certified Standing Orders and Clause 25 of Leave Rules of the Corporation as applicable to the workman . The workman was unauthorisedly absent w.e.f. 10-11-1996 and he did not respond to the Corporation's letter taking into consideration the workman's past record and letters issued tohim twice calling upon him to join duty immediately the management served a notice but the workman did not turn up. His services were terminated as per clause 12 of the Certified Standing Orders and as per clause 25 ofthe Leave Rules ofthe Corporation as applicable to the workman .

Clause 12 of Certified Standing Orders is regarding a workman who remains absent and does not report for duty within 8 days from the date of expiry of leave granted to him. He shall loose lien of his post and shall be deemed to have voluntarily left the services of the Corporation without notice.

Rule25 ofthe Leave Rules ofthe management is also regarding unauthorized absence of a workman who has proceeded on leave but did not report on duty within 8 dayson expiry of leave granted to him.

It is denied that the management has not complied with the principles of natural justice while the workman was treated to have voluntary abandoned the services of the Corporation . It is also denied that the workman was not given proper hearing before passing the order . It is submitted that there was no need for conducting any enquiry because the workman despite the receipt of the letters of the management did not respond and failed to jointhe duty . Therefore the management was left with no other option but to deem that the workman is no more interested in the services and has continuously absented himself from 10-11-96 . The workman was deemed to have voluntary abandoned the services of the Corporation without notice as per clause 12 of the certified standing orders and clause 25 of the leave rules of the NTPC applicable to the workman . The order was passed on 23-12-1996 by the Disciplinary Authority and the workman was intimated the abandonment of the services vide letter dated 23-12-96 and the said order was dispatched in due

Clause 12 ofthe Certified Standing Orders and Rule 25 of the Leave Rules are applicable in the case of those workmen who proceeded on leave after getting it approved and did not report to duty within 8 days after expiry of the approved leave period .

[ 'माग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

9951

भारत का राजपत्र :दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

In the instant case the workman has not proceeded on sanctioned leave . Leave was not sanctioned to him . He unauthorizedly absented himselffrom 10-11-1996 without any intimation . Clause 12 of the Certified Standing Orders and Rule 25 of the Leave Rules are regarding over stayal of leave. The workman in this case has not over stayed his leave period . No leave was granted to him . He remained absent unauthorizedly.

In the circumstances the workman's case comes up under Clause 21 (7) ofthe Certified Standing Orders which enumerates absence from duty without leave or without sanctioned cause. Under clause 21 (7) of the Certified Standing Orders an inquiry should be held for proving the misconduct of the workman .

Itwas further submitted from the side of the workman that due to sudden stabbing by some miscreant the workman remained absent from 10-11-1996 and afterbeing cured he went to the management with medical certificate and application , so the Leave Rules and Certified Standing Orders regarding over stayal of leave are not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the present case .

It was submitted from the side of the management that the workman was a habitual absconder . He was in a habit of remaining unauthorizedly absent on various occasions and various warnings and other punishments were inflicted on the workman .

The details ofwhich are given below :----

1. Warning issued vide letter dated 1-3-1974 for absence from duty .

2. Warning issued vide letter dated 17-7-1974 for absence from duty.

3. Suspension w.e.f. 22-9-1974 to 23-6-1975 vide letter dated 28-9-1974.

4. Chargesheet vide letter dated 2-1-1975.

5. Suspension revoked vide letter dated 21-6-1975.. No remuneration paid for the period of suspension vide letter dated 14-7-1975.

6. Minor penalty of stoppage of one increment with curnulative effect vide letter dated 27-8-1975 .

7. Warning issued vide letter dated 14-5-1976 .

Termination from service w.e.f. 29-7-1976 vide letter dated 27-7-1976 . 8.

9. Re- employment w.e.f. 21-1-1978 on the same post he was holding before the termination and same level of pay that he was drawing during the intervening period he was not paid any pay vide order dated 21-1-1978 .

10. Warning issued vide letter dated 21-4-1984.

11 . Chargesheet vide letter dated 7-12-1982 ..

12. Inquiry ordered vide letter dated 30-12-1983.

13. Imposed penalty of four days suspension withoutwages w.e.f. 1-5-1985 to 4-5-1985 vide letter dated 30-4-1985 .

4935 G1/07--20

44. Chargesheet vide letter dated 6-5-1985.

Imposed penalty of stoppage of 2 increments vide letterdated 3-5-1985 . 15.

16. Chargesheet vide letter dated 20-11-1989 for unauthorized absence .

17. Chargesheet vide letter dated 13-1-1990 for unauthorized absence .

18. Chargesheet vide, letter dated 15-1-1991 for unauthorized absence .

19. Chargesheet vide letter dated 29-1-1992 for unauthorized absence .

20. Chargesheet vide letter dated 22-1-1993 for unauthorized absence .

21. Chargesheet vide letter dated 12-5-1993 for unauthorized absence .

22. Chargesheet vide letter dated 24-8-1993 for unauthorized absence .

23. Chargesheet vide letter dated 28-12-1993 for unauthorized absence .

24. Show cause for censure issued on 12-10-1996 .

25. Major penalty of reduction in lower stage in time scale on pay by to increments for a period of two years was issued vide letter dated 12/16-10-1996.

It was further submitted from the side of the management that the Leave Rules framed by the management are applicable regarding its workmen, Standing Orders are not applicable.

As per Rule 25 an employee who remains absent for 8 days after the expiry of sanctioned leave shall loose lien onhis post and shall be deemed to have been voluntarily left the services of the Corporation .

This provision if for those employees who have proceeded on sanctioned leave and they have not turned up within 15/8 days after expiry of the sanctioned leave . In the instant case the workman remained absent without any intimation or sanction. He approached all of sudden after the order of termination was passed against him.

It was further submitted that the workman approached the management after almost 15 days while notices have been sent to him twice for appearance.

The workman has filed WW 1 /1A in which he has intimated the management that he was ill from 10-11-1996 and he will approach with medical certificate after being cured. This cannot be treated to be leave application of the workman, it is simply intimation .

The substantial question is whether the workman was so seriously ill that he could not attend his duties . He has not filed any certificate regarding his serious illness . The case of the workman is not covered under Clause 12 of the Standing Orders over stayal of leave .

In the circumstances the management should have held inquiry to ascertain the illness of the workman and his 9952

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

enability to teport to duty . The management should have terminated the services of the workman after holding inquiry . The management has simply issued notice for joining and when the workman did not join; his services were terminated by the management .

My attention was drawn to JT 2002 ( 6) SC 162. It has been held in this case that doctrine of natural justice is an inbuilt requirement of standing orders .

My attention was drawn by the management to 2004 LLR 953. It has been held in this case that in case a workman in each case was without sanctioned leave .... Mere making of application after or even before absence from work was of no avail as the requirement was obtaining leave in advance .

The workman has no doubt been absented on several occasions unauthorisedly. It is not denied by the workman that he was not absent in 1993 for 152 days , 119 days in 1994, 182 days in 1995. 119 days till 23-12-1996. The workman has been absent in all these five years for almost 1/2 in each year . It has not been also denied that the several punishments have not been imposed on the workman. It is no doubt no management will retain such an employee having a habit of remaining unauthorizedly absent on various occasions but the present incident cannot be decided in the light of precedents. The management can take help of previous management unauthorized absence of the workman on various occasions while giving punishment . The certificate filed by the workman does not inspire confidence . However, in such cases a fair inquiry should be held prior to inflicting punishment . The order of termination dated 23-12-1996 is notjustified . It is liable to be set aside and it is set aside .

It is true that the workman was absent for 152 days in 1993, 119 days in the year 1994 , 182 days in 1995 and 119 days in 1996. No management will like to retain such an employee who is in the habit of remaining absent unauthorisedly. It is also true that the workman has been served chargesheets and given warnings on 25 occasions . It appears that the management acted hastily and treated the workman as voluntarily abandonment of his services . Clause 12 of the Certified Standing Orders and Rule 25 of the Leave Rules are for over stayal . The order of voluntarily abandonment of service cannot be passed under Clause 12 of Certified Standing Orders and Rule 25 of Leave Rules . In the circumstances it was necessary for the management to hold an inquiry and pass appropriate order. However, the workman is not entitled to any back wages ; any consequential benefits and continuity of service in view of his previous unauthorized absence . The order dated 23-12-1996 is set aside .

The management should simply reinstate the workman and hold an inquiry as has been observed above and take appropriate action . The order of the management is neither legal nor justified as it is against the provisions

[PART II-Snc . 3 (ii) } of Leave Rules and Certified Standing Orders . The law citedby the management is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the present case .

The reference is replied thus : --

The action of the inanagement of Badarpur Thermal Power Station /National Thermal Power Corporation , New Delhi in terminating the services of Shri Jagdish Chander, Security Guard w.e.f. 23-12-1996 is neither legalnor justified. The management is directed to reinstate the workman without back wages within two months from the date of thepublication of the award . The management is at liberty to hold inquiry regarding the unauthorized absence of the workman and to take appropriate action .

Theaward is given accordingly. Date: 19-11-2007 .

R. N. RAJ , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3568. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. ई. बी. आई. (सेबी) के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 12/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/34/2005- आई आर( सी एम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th November , 2007 S.O. 3568.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. No. 12/2006 of the Central Government industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. 2 , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI ) , and their workman . received by the Central Government on 26-11-2007.

[No. L -42012/ 34/2005 - IR ( CM - 11) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT- II , NEW DELHI Presiding Officer : R. N. RAI

I. D. No. 12/2006

IN THE MATTEROF :

Shri Andand Ballabh & others , C / o Bharat Bhushan , 71/16 , Subhash Nagar , New Dlehi - 1100027 .

Versus 9953 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1, 1929

The Regional Manager, Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) , Rajendra Bhawan, Rajendra Place , NewDelhi .

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L -42012/34/ 2005 -IR(CM- II ) Central Government Dt . 16-2-2006 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The point runs as hereunder :-

ever present on the spot to supervise the work of any of the workmen . There was no control or supervision ofM/ s . Universal Enterprises on the work or conduct of the workmen in any sense of the word whatsoever. The said contractor had only provided the conduct for the employment of the workmen with the management. It may be mentioned here that one Shri P.R. Rajshekhar and one Shri Dhani Ram had also been appointed through the said M/s. Universal Enterprises and they were absorbed in the service of the management directly.

"Whether the demand of Shri Anand Ballabh & others for reinstatement and regularization in the establishment of SEBI is legal and justified? If so , to what reliefthey are entitled? "

The workmen applicants have filed claim statement.

That the fact that the services of two of the workmen appointed through M/s . Universal Enterprises had been regularized speaks itself volumes that the management had a policy to regularize in service , the persons recruited through M /s . Universal Enterprises .

That another fact that one Shri Anand Ballabh though appointed directly by the management was subsequently shown as having been appointed through M/ s. Universal Enterprises also shows that the M/ s . Universal Enterprises was merely a name lender as contractor and not a contractor employer in real sense of the word. Only a semblance was created that M/s . Universal enterprises was a contractor employer , the management was the Principal Employer and theworkmen were contract employees .

In the claim statement it has been stated that the workmen had been engaged initially at different times commencing from 1993 to 1997 through M/ s . Universal Enterprises at Kailash Building , Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi . The workmen had been engaged to carry certain menial jobs like receiving and delivering of DAK, operating and maintaining air conditioning plants , carrying minor electrical repairs, operating on EPABX, Telex, Fax and Xerox Machine besides serving tea , coffee , water to the staff on demand and giving files , stationary etc. to the staff on clemand and carrying the same from one table to the other on the orders ofthe officers or staff of the Respondent Management. It may be mentioned that Shri Anand Ballablı had been appointed without the intervention of aforesaid M/ s . Universal Enterprises .

That the moment the workmen started raising the voice for being regularized, the management which had been keeping the device of employing the workmen artificially as contract employees immediately terminated the contract with M/ s . Universal Enterprises and through thisdevice terminated the service of the workmen without giving any cause , notice , or wages in lieu notice , retrenchment compensation, in violation of Section 25 of Industrial Disputes Act .

That the management is a Government organization and State under Article 12 of the Constitution of India . It ought to have acted as a model employer and could not have acted otherwise . Being State it could not have discriminated between the Claimant workmen and the other twoworkmen regularized by it though they were all similarly , placed.

That the said M/ s . Universal Enterprises at Kailash Building, Kastruba Gandhi Marg , New Delhi was only a name as a contractor but was not actually controlling work or conduct of these workmen . The work of the workmen was being directly controlled by the management . The officers of the management used to allot duties and orders as to what work was being done by which workmen and then control and supervise the work directly . It used to be decided by the officers of the management as to when any workman was to be sent for outside job for collecting some DAK or delivering it and payment for such work was being done by the management directly though the monthly wages were being paid through the M/ s . Universal. Enterprises at Kailash Building, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi . There was a paper arrangement between the said M/s . Universal Enterprises and the management and the M/s . Universal Enterprises was a contractor and the management was the principal employer although as stated above the work of the workmen was being controlled and supervised by the management directly through its officers and staff.

That the workmen were paid much less than the payment they were entitled to even as ordinate employees in terms of their regulation . The Management being State could not have discriminated as far as payment of wages is concerned between whom it recognize as its direct employees and the workmen whom it refused to recognize asdirected employees contrary to the reality. The law requires that even the contract labours were entitled to equal wages . The above may not be treated as an admission on the part of the workmen that they were contract employees .

The workmen submit that they were direct employees of the management as their work and conduct was being directly controlled and supervised by the management and That the so called contract i.e. M/s . Universal Enterprises had no role whatsoever in allocating the work tobe done by the workmen from time to time on day to day basis . No representative of M/ s . Universal Enterprises was 9954

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1,1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

marketing organization. It is submitted that the objects for establishing SEBI and the functions of SEBI which are clear from the provisions of the SEBI Act clearly establish that SEBI is not an industry nor it is carrying any trade or commerce.

the M/ s. Universal Enterprises was merely a name lender as a contractor and had no control over the work of the workmen nor did M/ s . Universal Enterprises do anything to supervise the work and conduct ofthe workmen .Merely because the wages were being disbursed through M/ s . Universal Enterprise , M/ s . Universal Enterprises cannot be termed as a real employer and the workmen as contract employees.

That the workmen are entitled to be treated as direct employees of the management in the facts and circumstances of the case . Even otherwise the management had a policy of regularizing the services of the employees through the contractor and being a State could not have discriminated between one set of the employees and the other when they were similarly placed . From this point of view the workmen are entitled to be regularized in the service of the management.

The workmen are/were not the workmen of the management inasmuch as the workmen were under the employment of and were provided by one M/ s . Universal Enterprises ( Contractor) with whom the management had a contract for providing services maintenance /cleaning/ dusting ofthe office premises of the management situated in Delhi . In terms of the agreement/ contract entered into between the Contractor and the management , the contractor was to provide services for carrying out the above work in the Delhi office of the management , through the persons suppliedby the Contractor . The period of the above services to be rendered by the Contractor was for a period of one year only. After the expiry of the contract period of one year , a fresh contract was entered into between the management and the Contractor for carrying out the above mentioned and/ or allied works again for a period of one year only.

TheManagement has filed written statement . In the written statement it has been stated that, it is submitted that the Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as SEBI ) is a regulatory Agency which has been established under the Securities & Exchange Board of India Act in 1992. SEBI is an independent and autonomous body constituted under the act of the parliament. It is pertinent to mention that SEBI is only a regulatory body and not profit making organization . It runs its activity with the aid of SEBI general fund as provided under Section 14 of the SEBI Act.

The workmen therefore were never employed by the management and hence the wages of the workmen were not being paid by the management to the workmen . The contracts of providing services to the management were between the management and the contractor which contracts were valid in law.

The capital market had been witnessing tremendous growth in the recent times , particularly by increasing participation of the public . Investor's confidence in capital market got sustained largely by ensuring investors protection. With this object and view, the Government decided to vest SEBI with statutory powers , required for dealing effectively with all matters relating to capital market . Therefore, it is submitted that SEBI in order to carry out its functions effectively was given the status of statutory body and, independence requiredto regulate and promote the capital market.

The powers and the functions of the board are described u/ s . 11 of SEBI Act , 1992 , sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 11 provides that subject to the provisions of the Act, it shall be the duty of the board to protect the interest of the investors in securities and to promote the development and to regulate the securities market by such measures as it thinks fit .

The provisions of Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 do not come into play in the present case in view of the fact that even assuming for the sake of arguments though not admitting that the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 applies to the management and consequently the workmen were in fact workmen of the management, the indirect termination of the services of the workmen cannot be termed as retrenchment under the provisions of Section 2( oo ) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 inasmuch as the termination of the services of the workmen was a result of the non - renewal of the contract between the management and the workmen concemed on its expiry . The last contract executedbetween the management and the Contractor which was executed on July 1 , 1998 expired on 30th June, 1999, and the same was not renewed thereafter . The termination of the workmen therefore comes with the purview of the exception created by the legislature in terms of the sub -clause (bb) of Section 2(oo) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 .

The management is not an industry as defined in Section 2 (j ) of the Industrial Disputes Act . A perusal of the Section 11 of the SEBI Act, which enumerates the functions ofthe SEBI in detail clearly reveal that SEBI is an independent and autonomous body constituted under the Act of the Parliament . It is not carrying on any trade , industry or commercial activity neither does it functions under the control of Central Government . It is submitted that SEBI is only a regulatory body and not an approved

It is further denied that Shri Anand Ballabh was appointed without the intervention of afore mentioned M/ s . Universal Enterprises . It has been admitted by Shri Anand Ballabh in the Writ Petition as well complaint filed before the Asstt . Labour Commissioner ( Central ) that all the workmen including the claimant had been engaged through the contractor . It is denied that the claimants had been working under the control and supervision of SEBI . The [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

claimants have themselves admitted in the Writ Petition that they were under the employment of the contractor who used to pay them wages . It is denied that M/ s . Universal Enterprises i.e. Contractor was only name lender but was not actually controlling work or conduct of these workmen. It is further denied that the work ofworkmen was being directly controlled by the management and the duties used to be allotted by the management . It is reiterated that the claimants had been employed by the contractor.

Theywere its employees drawing wages from it and were working under it's supervision and control . A bare perusal of the documents clearly reveals that the persons provided by the contractor were under the direct control and supervision of the contractor.

It is denied that SEBI had any control over the above- mentioned persons in respect of the manner in which the work was performed. The work used to be supervised by the contractor. No attendance register was maintainedby SEBI and they were answerable to the contractor . Besides this SEBI was not even informed about their proposed leave also . It is vehemently denied that the contractor had no role whatsoever in the allotment of duties . It is further denied that SEBI was making arrangement of allocation of their duties and was also changing them . It is vehemently denied that there was no control or supervision of M/s . Universal Enterprises on the work or conduct of the workmen. It is also denied that the contractor had only provided the conduct for the employment of the workmen with the management . It is denied that there was only any policy of SEBI to regularize the services of the persons recruited through M/ s . Universal Enterprises was regularized under the said policy. It is further submitted that appointment of Shri P. R. Rejshekharan and Dhani Ram was in accordance with the mode and procedure adopted by SEBI for recruitment it is merely a co- incidence that they had earlier worked through M/s . Universal Enterprises.

It is submitted that SEBI is independent and autonomous body constituted under the Act of Parliament. It is not carrying on any trade , industry of commercial activity neither does it function under the control of Central Government . It is submitted that SEBI is only a regulatory body and noi an approved marketing organization . It runs its activities with the aid of SEBI General Fund u/s . 14 of the SEBI Act . It is submitted that the objects for establishing SEBI and the functions of SEBI which are clear from the provisions of the SEBI Act clearly establish that SEBI is not an industry nor it is carrying any trade or commerce . It is further submitted that SEBI is neither an industry nor an establishment within the meaning of the Contractor Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act . It therefore is not subject to the provisions of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act , 1970 .

The respondents SEBI had noting to do with the service conditions of the claimants as the claimants had

9955

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

been appointed by the Contractor i.e. M/ s . Universal Enterprises and the service conditions of the employees were a matter between the contractor and the claimants and SEBI was not concerned with it in any manner whatsoever . It is denied that the service contractors were governed by very regulations or law qua the management.

It issubmitted that the claimants were receiving the wages admissible under law from the contractor. Theywere not entitled to claim parity with the pay scales of employees by SEBI . It has already been stated hereinabove , that their service conditions were fixed by their employers i.e. M/s. Universal Enterprises and they could not have claimed any parity with SEBI . It is further stated that SEBI in any manner was not responsible for fixing their pay scales and making the payment to them.

: Theworkmen applicants have filed rejoinder . In the rejoinder they have reiterated the averments of their claim statement and have denied most of the paras of the written statement . The management has also denied most of the paras ofthe claim statement.

Evidence ofboth the parties has been taken.

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.

From perusal of the pleadings of the parties the following issues arise for adjudication :-

1. Whether there is employer -employee relationship between the management and the workmen?

2. Whether the management is an Industry?

3. Whether the workmen have completed 240 days and are entitled to reinstatement/ regularization?

4. To what amount of back wages the workmen are entitled?

5. Relief ifany?

ISSUE No. 1

It was submitted from the side of the workmen that they were engaged through contractor M/s . Universal Enterprises at Kailash Building, K.G. Marg, New Delhi and they worked from 1993 to 1997 under the control and supervision of the management. They were assigned the menial jobs like receiving and delivery of daks , operating and maintaining Air Conditions Plants , carrying minor electrical repairs , operating on EPABX, Telex, Fax and Xerox Machine besides serving tea , coffee, water to the staff on demand and giving files, stationary etc. to the staff on demand and carrying the same from one table to the other on the orders of the officers or staff of the Respondent Management . It may be mentioned that Shri Anand Ballabh had been appointed without the intervention of aforesaid M/s . Universal Enterprises .

Itwas further submitted that the work of the workmen was being directly controlled by the management . The 9956

PART 11-SFC. 3 ( 1) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 1929

and papers ele.by the Officers of their office from time to one ta he debered at the offices of the concerned Ministries of the Government of India . MWI has stated that he did not know whether his Officers were issuing orders for distributing and allocating duties to the workmen . He has further stated that he was not directly handling administration, so he was not aware as to who was getting the work done from the workmen .

officers of the management used to allot duties and orders as to what work was being done by which workmen and then control and supervise the work directly . It used to be decided by the officers of the management as to when any workman was to be sent for outside job for collecting some DAK or delivering it and payment for such work was being done by the management directly though the monthly wages were being paid through the M/ s . Universal Enterprises at Kailash Building , Kasturba Gandhi Marg , New Delhi . There was a paper arrangement between the said M / s . Universal Enterprises and the management and the M/ s . Universal Enterprises was a contractor and the management was the principal employer although as stated above the work of the workmen was being controlled and supervised by the management directly through its officers and staff.

This witness has admitted that the Officers of his office used to give the johs of delivery of letters , papers to be delivered at the offices of the concerned Ministries of Government of India . This witness has expressed his enability in tell as to who controlled the work of the workmen and who allotted the duties to the workmen . He has not stated anywhere that the contractor controlled the work of these workmen . These workmen were working in the premises of the management, so their services are integrated to the management. These workmen worked under the control and guidance of the management as per the admission of MWI .

The workrmen have filed paper No. B - 141 . This document is photocony but this document has not been denied. The workinen annet get the originals of the orders ofthe management. These documents show that the duties to the office boys have been assigned area - wise . The entire officework has been taken by these 4 workmen.

Itwas submitted from the side of the management that the workmen were engaged by the contractor and they worked under the control and supervision of the contractor. Theworkmen were under the employment of M/s . Universal Enterprises with whom the management had contract for providing service of maintenance/cleaning/dusting of the office premises of the management situated in Delhi . The contractor supplied the workmen and the workroen woed under the control and guidance of the contactor. The management has no control over the subsistence , skill and work of the contractor's workmen .

Paper No. B - 143 is on the letter head of the management and Sh . Munna Lal has been assigned the work of collecting the commission cheque . It has been signed by the Sh. R. R. Murari , Officer .

The contractor used to make payment of wages to theworkmen . He was not only name lender hut was actually controlling the work and conduct of these workmen . The duties were also allotted to the workmen by the said contractor .

Paper No. B - 144 is also such a document signed by Sh. Sharad K. Sharma. Paper No. B- 145 is office order by which Sh . Anand Ballabh and Sh . Sarinder have been allotted duties . This photocopy document has been singned by Sh. P. K. Bindlish and this document has been distributed to Admn . Department (All Concerned) .

Ithas been stated by the management witness in his cross -examination that their work included cleaning ofthe office and handling the dak and any other work which office peons can do . Mr. Sharad K. Sharma , Shri R. R. Murari were officers of the management at NRO .

" I agree that for equal work equal pay to be given . I have no knowledge if any pay scales were fixed for office peons or subordinate staff of our organization. I have no knowledge whether our officers were issued orders distributing or allocating duties to the workmen . As I was not directly handling administration I am not aware who was getting work done from the workmen . "

It has been further stated by this management witness that it could be true that these workmen were given the jobs of delivery letters , documents and papers etc. by the officers of our office from time to time to be delivered at the offices of concerned Ministries of the Government of India, RBI Offices of Stock Exchanges , Residence of the Members ofBoards of SEBI , Government Press .

Paper No. B - 146 is also photocopy regarding allotment of duties . It has been signed by Sh . C. R. Unny , Officer (Pers . and TRG. ) . Simitarly Paper Nos . B - 149 , B - 150 , B - 151 , B - 152 , B - 153 , B - 154, B-155 , B - 155 , B - 157 and B-158 are photocopies which relate to the assignment of work to these workmen . These photocopies are on the tetter head of the management and it has been signed by the management . These documents also indicate that the duty chart was prepared by the management . There are several other documents which are photocopies no doubt but are on the letter head of the management and these photocopies have been signed by the management. These photocopies documents and signatures thereon have not been denied by the management . The originals are in the possession of the management . In such circumstances these photocopies are admissible in evidence . MW2 has also admitted in cross-examination that he had no knowledge whether dutiesto these workmen were assigned by the officers of the management .mar This witness has also It becomes quite obvious from perusal of the cross- examination of the witness that he has admitted that the workmen were given the jobs of dak delivery , documents [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

stated that he was not in a position to recognize the signatures on the photocopies of the documents filed by the workmen . The signatures on the documents mentioned above of the Officers of the SEBI has not been denied by any of the manageinent witnesses .

The case of the management is that the workmen are engaged through contractors . In case the work is of perennial and permanent nature , contract labour should not be engaged.

Itwas submitted from the side of the management that in view of Uma Devi 2006 SCC ( L & S) 753 no question of regularization arises . The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the same case has also emphasized that the Courts/Tribunals in their sympathy for the handful adhoc/ casual employees before it cannot ignore the claims for equal opportunity for the teeming millions of the country who are also seeking ermployment. In such case , the Courts /Tribunals should adhere to the Constitutional normis and should not water down constitutional requirement in any way.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in AIR 2001 SC 3527 has held that the industrial adjudicator will have to consider the question whether the contract has been interposed either on the ground of having undertaken to produce any given result for the establishment or supply of contract labour for work of the establishment under the genuine contract or whether it is a mere ruse/camouflage to evade compliance of various beneficial legislations so as to deprive the workers of the benefits there under . If the contract is not genuine the alleged contract labour should be treated as the employees of the principal employer who shall be directed to regularize the services of the contract labour in the concerned establishment . In the instant case itis proven fact that the contractors are mere name givers and job lenders . The workman work under the control and supervision of the management.

It has been held in AIR 1953 SC 404 that if a master employs a servant and authorize him to employ a number of persons to do a particular job and to guarantee their fidelity and efficiency for cash consideration , the employees thus appointed by the servant will be equally with the employer servant of the masters . In the instant case there is no servant to employ a number of persons . The name of the contractor is fake one . The workmen have been retained in the service of the management since 1995-96.2 workmen have been working continuously since 1995-96 and they have become an asset to the management .

It has been held in 1997 AIR SCW Page 430 that the industrial adjudicator should decide whether there is valid contract or it is a mere ruse/camouflage and if it is found that the contractor is only a name lender the management should be directed to regularize the workmen.

Accordingto the criteria there should be control and integration . The management has doubtless control over the alleged contractor's men as they worked in the

9957

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

establishment of the management . They are integrated to the service of the management . There are no terms and conditions of the contract so there is master and servant relationship. The creation of contract labour is only sham and camouflage and the employer cannot be relieved of his liabilities.

In JT 1999 (2) SC 435-the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that if the work is of perennial nature or of sufficient duration , contract workers shall be considered to be the direct employees of the management and they are entitled to be absorbed permanently as employees of the management.

The work in the instant case , no doubt, is of perennial nature as such the workmen have been continuously working since 1993. It is for sufficient duration . So the alleged contractor's men will become the servant of the management .

It was submitted from the side of the management that the workmen are the contractor's men and this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to regularize the workmen. Only the Central Government can abolish the contract labour and direct for regularization of the contractor's men . There is no merit in the argument of the management. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in a Catena of cases has decided that it is the duty of industrial adjudicator to examine and give findings whether contract labour is sham and a mere camouflage to evade the rigours of the labour laws .

In Pollock Law of Torts a servant and an independent contractor has been defined as under :-

The distinction between a servant and a independent contractor has been the subject matter of a large volume of case- law from which the text-book writers on torts have attempted to lay down some general tests . For example, in Pollock's Low of Torts , (Pages 62 and 63 of Pollock on Torts , 15th Edn .) the distinction has thus been brought out:

"A master is one who not only prescribes to the workman the end of his work, but directs or at any moment may direct the means also , or , as it has been put, retains the power of controlling the work , a servant is a person subject to the command of his master as to the manner in which he shall do his work An independent contractor is one who undertakes to produce a given result but so that in the actual execution ofthe work is not under the order or control ofthe person for whom he does it , and may use his own discretion in things not specified before hand .......... "

In Salmond's Treatise on the Law of Torts the distinction between a servant and independent contractor has been indicated as under :-

"What then, is the test of this distinction between a servant and an independent contractor ? The test is the existence ofaright ofcontrol over the agent in respect of the manner inwhich hiswork is to be done. Aservant is an agent who works under the supervision and direction ofhis employer; an independent contractor is one who is his 9958

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

own master . A servant is a person engaged to obey his employer's orders from time to time ; an independent contractor is a person engaged to do certain work , but to exercise his own discretion as to the mode and time of doing it he is bound by his contract, but not by his employer's orders . " The management retains the power of controlling the work so the workmen are the employees of the respondent/ management .

The tests regarding independent contractor and intermediaries have been laid down in Hussainabhai , Calicut V. theAlath Factory Thezhilali Union Kozhikode [ (AIR 1978 SC 1410 (3 Judges ) ] " the true test may , with brevity, be indicated once again . Where a worker or group of workers labours to produce goods or services and these goods or services are for the business of another , that other is , in fact, the employer . He has economic control over the workers subsistence , skill and continued employment . If he, for any reason, chokes off, the worker is , virtually, laid off. The presence of intermediate contractors with whom the workers have immediate or direct relationship as contract is of no consequence when, on lifting the veil or looking at the conspectus of factors governing employment, we discern the naked truth , though draped in different perfect paper arrangement, that the real employer is the management , not the immediate contractor . Myriad devices , half-hidden in fold after fold of legal form depending on the degree of concealment needed , the type ofindustry, the local conditions and the like may be resorted to when labour legislation casts welfare obligations on the real employer , based on Articles 38, 39, 42, 43 and 43 -A of the Constitution . The Court must be astute to avoid the mischief and achieve the purpose of the law and not be misled by the maya of legal appearances ."

My attention was drawn to another Constitution Bench Judgment-Steel Authority of India . It has been held as under :-

"Where a workman is hired in or in connection with the work of an establishment by the principal employer through a contractor , he merely acts as an agent so there will be master and servant relationship between the principal employer and the workmen . But where a workman is hired in or in connection with the work of an establishment by a contractor, either because he has undertaken to produce a given result for the establishment or because he supplies workmen for any work of the establishment , a question arise whether the contract is a mere camouflage as in Hussainabhai Calicut's case ( supra ) and in Indian Petrochemicals Corporation's case (supra) etc .; if the answer is in the affirmative , the workmen will be in fact an employee of the principal employer , but if the answer is in the negative, the workmen will be a contract labourer . " Inthe instant case the workmen have not been hired in connection with the work of a contractor but they have beenhired by the contractor for the work of the respondents .

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)] So in the instant case there is contract of service between the principal employer and the workmen . In view of the judgment the workmen become the employees of the management .

The Constitution Bench Judgment of Steel Authority of India is squarely applicable in the instant case . In JT 2001 (7) SC 268 it has been held that " 121 (5) On issuance ofprohibition notification under Section 10(1) of the CLRA Act prohibiting employment of Contract Labour or otherwise , in an industrial dispute brought IOC before it by any contract labour in regard to conditions of service , the industrial adjudicator will have to consider the question whether the contractor has been interposed either on the ground of having undertaken to produce any given result for the establishment or for supply of contract labour for work of the establishment under a genuine contract or is a mere ruse /camouflage to evade compliance with various beneficial legislations so as to deprive the workers of the benefit thereunder . If the contract is found to be not genuine but a mere camouflage , the so-called contract labour will have to be treated as employees of the principal employer who shall be directed to regularize the services of the contract labour in the establishment concerned ." It has been held in this case that whether there is prohibition of contract labour or otherwise the industrial adjudicator will have to consider the question and in case the contract appears ruse and camouflage to evade compliance with various beneficial legislations the so called contract labour will have to be treated as the employee of the principal employer and he shall be directed to regularize the services of the contract workers .

Accordingto well recognized definition of contract it is an agreement for a given result . The result should be visible. Contract labourers can be engaged for the work of contractor only and not for the work of any establishment . Inthe present case the work is of the establishment and not of the contractor . The term supply of labour by a contractor is against human dignity . No one can be a supplier of human labour to any establishment. It is the duty of the State to give employment to citizen and not of the contractors . Contractors cannot supply labour to any establishment .

In the instant case the workmen have been always working under the control and guidance of the management .

The Hon'ble Apex Court has held that the sole test iswhether or not the hirer controlled the manner of executing the act in question. In the instant case it is amply proved by the admission of the two witnesses of the management and the documents mentioned above that the hirer i.e. the management has authority to control the manner of execution of act in question .

It has been further held by the Hon'ble Apex Court that in case the contract is mere a camouflage the workmen canbe treated as the employees of the Principal Employer .

['भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

The workmen have been hired for the work of the establishment of SEBI and the workmen have worked under the control and supervision and guidance of the management so the contractor is a mere name lender and contract is sham. There is master and servant relationship between the management and the workmen . The workmen are the employees of the Principal Employer .

This issue is decided accordingly.

ISSUE No. 2.

It was submitted from the side of the management that the management ( SEBI ) is a regulatory agency established under the SEBI Act in 1992 .

It was further submitted that SEBI is an independent and autonomous body constituted under the Act of Parliament. It is only a regulatory body. It is not profit making organization . It runs its activities with the aid of SEBI general fund . The SEBI has been given the status of statutory body. It is independent. It is required to regulate and promote the capital market. It is not carrying on any trade, business or commercial activities .

It was submitted from the side of the workmen that the judgment of the Constitution Bench (1978) 3 SCR 207 still holds the field so far as definition of 2 (j ) of ID is concerned. The Hon'ble Apex Court in that judgment has laid down triple tests and in the light of these tests it is to be ascertained whether the respondent/management is an Industry or not .

It has been held in Bangalore Water Supply that in an Industry there should be systematic activity and it should be organized by cooperation between the employer and the employees and it should be for production and/ or distribution of goods and service calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes . It has been held that absence of profit motive or gainful objective is irrelevant. The true focus is functional and the decisive test is the nature of the activity with special emphasis on the employer and employee relations . If an organization is not carrying on trade and business , it is not beyond the purview of Industrial activities .

(1978) 3 SCR-Bangalore Water Supply case is a Constitution Bench judgment. It is still holding the field in the matter of adjudication of this point .

It has been held in this case that Section 2(j ) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 which defines industry contains words of wide import as wide as the legislature could have possibly made them . The problem of what limitations could and should be reasonably read in interpreting the wide words used in Section 2(j ) is far too policy oriented to be satisfactorily settled by judicial decisions . The Parliament must step in and legislate in a manner which will leave no doubt as to its intention . That alone can afford a satisfactory solution to the question which has agitated and perplexed the judiciary at all levels. 4935G1/07-21

9959

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

In this judgment the Hon'ble Apex Court has laid down triple test to ascertain whether a particular unit or undertaking is an industry or not. It has been held in this casethat where there is (i ) systematic activity , (ii) organized bycooperationbetween employer and employee (the direct and substantial element is chimerical ) ( iii ) for the production and/or distribution of goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes (not spiritual or religious , but inclusive of material things or services geared to celestial bliss e.g. inaking on a large scale prasad or food) .

(b)Absence of profit motive or gainful objective is irrelevant be the venture in the public , joint , private or other sector .

(c) The true focus is functional and the decisive test is the nature of the activity with special emphasis on the employer employee relations .

(d) If the organization is a trade or business it does not cease to be one because of philanthropy animating the undertaking.

Although Section 2 (j ) uses words of the widest amplitude in its two limbs , their meaning cannot be magnified to over or each itself.

The Hon'ble Apex Court has laid down further the dominant nature test . It has been held as follow :-

"Where a complex of activities some of which qualify for exemption, others not involves employees on the total undertaking some of whom are not workmen as in the University of Delhi case or some departments are not productive of goods and services if isolated, even then the predominant nature of the services and the integrated nature of the departments as explained in the Corporation ofNagpur will be the true test. The whole undertaking will be industry although those who are not workmen by definition may not benefit by the status .

Notwithstanding the previous clauses , sovereign functions, strictly understood (alone) , qualify for exemption not the welfare activities of economic adventures undertaken by govemment or statutory bodies.

Evenin departments discharging sovereign functions if there are units which are industries and they are substantially severable then they can be considered to comewithin section 2(j ).

Fromperusal ofthe records it becomes quite evident that the respondent/management is engaged in systematic human activities . The respondents are not discharging duties for gains but gainful objective is irrelevant in deciding whether an undertaking is an industry or not .

The function of the respondent is to regulate and promote the capital market . There are systematic activities organized by operation between the employer and the employee . The respondent is not a profit making but gainful objective is irrelevant for holding an establishment to be 9960

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

an Industry . The respondent is functioning with employer- employee relationship and there are systematic activities between the employer and the employees . An undertaking is held an Industry on the nature of work it is performing . The respondents are not engaged in a sovereign function .

In case activities of the respondents are considered in the crucible of the triple tests, the respondent is obviously an industry.

ISSUE No. 3

The workmen have worked from 1993 to 1997. It is not denied that they have not worked regularly . The only case of the management is that they worked as contractor's men. Whiledeciding Issue No.1 it has been held that there is direct relationship of employer and employee between the management and the workmen . The workmen have worked for more than 240 days admittedly. No retrenchment compensation and one month's pay in lieu of notice has been given to the workmen .

The workmen have worked continuously from 1993 to 1997 and it has been held while deciding issue No. 1 that there is master and servant relationship between the employer and employee. The workmen , after master and servant relationship is established, are entitled to the benefits of section 25 F of the ID Act , 1947. They have worked for long 4 years as regular employees under the management .

The workmen applicants are entitled to one month's pay in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensation in view of section 25 F of the ID Act, 1947.

The management has regularized two such contract workers without any regular process of selection . It is not denied by the management that Sh. P.R. Rajesh Kharan and Sh . Dhani Ram ( contract workers ) have not been regularized on their simple application. It is also found proved that the management is still continuing such work with the other contractors . The work is in existence . These workmen have worked for 4 years . In such cases compensation is no remedy. If the work is existing the workmen should be reinstated. Engagement of contract labour for perennial nature of work is illegal in view of section 10 of the CLRA Act , 1970.

This issue is decided accordingly .

ISSUE No. 4

It was submitted by the management that payment of full back wages is not the natural consequence of the order ofdischarge or dismissal being set aside . It has been held in ( 2003 ) 6 SCC 141 that it is incumbent upon the labour court to decide the quantum of back wages .

It has been further held in this case that payment of back wages having discretionary element involved it is to be dealt with the facts and circumstances of the case . No definite formula can be evolved.

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)] In 2005 IV AD SC 39 - three Judges Bench of the Hon'bleApex Court held that reinstatement with full back wages is justified. In this case the workman has performed more than 240 days work and he has been retrenched without payment of compensation and pay in lieu ofnotice.

Services of the workmen were terminated in 1997 but they have raised this dispute in 2006 almost after 7 to 8 years. In view of the delay also they are entitled to get only 10% back wages . The law cited by the management is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the present case .

This issue is decided accordingly .

ISSUE No. 5

From the decision of the above 4 issues it becomes quite obvious that the services of the workmen have be terminated illegally and arbitrarily and the workmen are entitled to reinstatement along with 10 % back wages .

The reference is replied thus :-

The demand of S/Shri Anand Ballabh , Munna Lal , Satish Kumar , Birender & Shri Rattan for reinstatement in the establishment of SEBI is legal and justified . The management should reinstate the workmen along with 10% back wages within two months from the date of the publication of the award.

The award is given accordingly.

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer Date: 21-11-2007

नई दिल्ली , 28 नवम्बर, 2007

का.आ. 3569.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.पी.डब्ल्यू. डी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 96/94) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -42011 / 13/94- आई. आर. (डी.यू.) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 28th November , 2007 S.O. 3569. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 96/94. ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court No. 1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of C.P.W.D. andtheirworkman , received by the Central Government on 28-11-2007.

[No. L-42011/13/94- IR ( DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer 9961 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II .खण्ड 3( ii) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE SANT SINGH BAL, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. I, NEW DELHI

I.D. No. 96/94

In the matter of the dispute between :

Ms. Asha Joshi and Sushil Kumar Bhatt

Through General Secretary ,

1-1-86 upto date they have been getting the wages in the time scale of Rs . 950-1500 ; The Hon'ble Supreme Court vide their order mentioned above had also directed the management and hoped that government will take appro- priate action to regularize the services of those workmen who have been in continuous service/employment for more than6 months and the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the mat- ter of CPWD Karamchari Union Vs. Union of India and others on 25-3-92 have passed the following orders :

CPWD Mazdoor Union ,

E-26 Old Quarter ,

...Workmen

Baba Kharag Singh Marg, New Delhi - 110001.

Versus

Director General Works,

C.P.W.D. Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi .

...Management

APPEARANCES : Workermen in person with

"The learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the respondents states that the 91 workers. except those who have already been regularized will be regularized within a period of four weeks subject to their eligibility and their seniority willbe fixed later on. The regularization will not confer any right to claim seniority from the date of entry . Weare acceptingthe statement of the Learned Addl . Solicitor General and we close this petition . The contempt petition is disposed of accordingly . " Shri B.K. Pd . A.R for the workmen . Shri Bhisham Dev Mound A/R for the Management alongwith Shri S.C. Kapoor .

AWARD

The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-42011 / 13 /94- IR(DU) dated 12/.17th August, 1994 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-

"Whether the action of the management of C.P.W.D. in not regularizing the services of Ms Asha Joshi L.D. C. w.e.f. 1-5-87 and Shri Shshil Kumar Bhatt L.D.C. w.e.f. 26-7-86 is justified If not, what relief they are entitled to? "

That the management has not regularized the services of above mentioned workmen in the time siasle of Rs . 950-1500 even though they are having all essential qualifications and other eligibility conditions and continuously working since 1986 and to deny them the benefits of regular workmen in unfair labour practice adopted by the management . The management have also precribed the minimum qualification for the post of L.D. Cs as matric but the workmen Ms. Asha Josju is a Graduate and Shri Sushil Kumar Bhatt is M.A. That the Hon'ble Tribunal is withinits jurisdiction to regularize the services of workmen as envisaged in 3rd Schedule in Item No. 7 ' classification byGrade' . Thus the workmen Ms. Asha Joshi is entitledto be regularized as L.D.C. w.e.f. 1-5-87 and Shri Sushil Kumar Bhatt w.e.f. 26-7-87 respectively in the pay scasle of Rs. 950-1500. It is , therefore , prayed that the services of Ms. Asha Joshi may be regularized w.e.f. 1-5-87 and that of Shri Shshil Kumar Bhatt may be regularized w.e.f. 26-7-87 in the pay scale of Rs . 950-1500 with increments , bonus, seniority and with all consequental benefits in the grade.

2. Brief facts of this case as culled from record are that the workmen Ms. Asha Joshi and Sushil Kumar Bhatt have been working in J. Division , CPWD under the control of the management and both of them have been doing the work of typing . It is stated that regular L. D. Cs , recruited by the management have also been doing same type of work in the time scale of Rs . 950-1500 with all allowances whereas the workmen herein were only paid less wages and facilities . The workmen have been doing same and similar work as their counter parts in regular time scale have been performing but the management have been exploiting the workmen thereby indulged alsos in unfair labour practice ; The management have been discriminat- ing in the payment of pay and allowances as prescribed in Equal Remuneration Act , 1976. these type of discrimina- tion is not permissible even under the Act and is also violative of natural rights granted by the Consititution of India in Part III . Only to deny the same wages and facilities, the workmen have been engaged on so -called contract basis on the regular job which is unfair labour practice under the 5th Scheduled of Indistrial Disputes Act , 1947 . After the judgement of the Honourable Supreme Court vide their order dated 17-1-86 all the workmen had got arrears of their wages in the old pay scale of Rs . 260-400 and from

3. The case has been contested by the management by filing written statement denying that the workmen are working in J Division an any capacity. They are doing typing work on contract basis and are paid@ Rs. 3/- per latter.Hence the question of regularization and entitlement ofany relief does not arise. It is denied that they are covered under the I.D. Act and under any department recruitment Rules. It is stated that they are working on purely contract basis like the typing work got done from private shop . Thatas per the recruitnment rules for the post of L.D. Cs . in the Government on which these two persons are seeking regularization a candidates should not only be educationally qualified but also he has to come through the compeitive examination being held at present by the StaffSelectionCommission . Therefore , they cannot be even said to be eligible for the post of L.D.C. Both the workmen 9962

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] doing typing work on contract are not covered under the judgement of the Hon'ble Suprement Court dated 17-1-86 and the judgement dated 25-3-1992 is only for C.P.W.D. Workers not for private contract workmen . It is prayed that the workmen are not entitled for regularization as L.D.C. and for any consequential benefits .

4. The workmen filed rejoinder in which they denied the controverted facts of the written statement and reiterated their claim statement as correct .

any complaint which shows that their work is quite satisfactory and that they are competent to do the typing work . They are working with the respodnent and there exists relationship of employer and employee between the workman and the respondent management . It is an admitted fact that they are working as typist and not working in any supervisory post . Hence they are workman under the provisions of I. D. Act. Both of them are workman as defined in the I. D. Act . From the above facts it is apparently clear that both the workman have been working for the last 20 years or so as typist satisfactorily with the management without any complaint which shows that they are quite efficient and competent in performance of their duties as typist . Hence they are entitled to the relief of regularization in view of the above discussions I hold that both the claimants Asha Joshi and Sushil Kumar Bhatt are workman and that they are competent and efficient to act as typist and the respondent is, therefore, directed to regularize Ms. Asha Joshi w.e.f. 1-5-87 and Mr. Sushil Kumar Bhatt w.e.f. 26-7-87 as typist Award is passed accordingly . File be consigned to record room.

Dated 15-11-07 SANT SINGH BAL, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 28 नवम्बर , 2007

5. The management examined Shri Amarjeet Singh Head Clerk of the management who stated that he know nothing about this case as this was last opportunity for management evidence and management failed to bring evidence . Hence management evidence was ordered to be closed on 13-5-97 and for workmen evidence case was adjourned to 22-7-97. workman Ms. Asha Joshi appeared as WW1 and Shri Sushil Kumar Bhatt appeared as WW2 . They were cross examined by the management . WW1 stated that both the workmen used to work and sit in the office whenever they were called for work . The typewriter used by them belong to the department . Payment has been made to them on monthly basis on the basis ofhand receipt. Register in which entries regarding the letters typed by these people nade is in the office . All these shows that workrmen were compeletely under the control of the respondent CPWD and working on hand receipt basis and were in fact workmen -claimant and both the workmen posses higher qualifications then required for the post of

L.D.C/typist . Ms. Asha L.D.C./typist. Ms. Asha Joshi is

का.आ. 3570. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार नवेल डॉकयार्ड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं.- II , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई टी 2/38 ऑफ 2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

B.A. and Mr. Sushil Kumar Bhatt is M.A. as per documents

placed on record .

[सं. एल-14012/ 12/99- आई. आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्रसिंह, डेस्कअधिकारी

New Delhi , the 28th November , 2007 5. Thereafter written arguments were filed by both the parties.

7. I have heard the A/Rs of both the parties at length.

8. I have given my thoughtful consideration to the contentions raised by both the parties.

9. The question which arise for consideration in this case is :-

1. "Whether both the workmen are workmen under provisions of I.D. Act . ?

S.O. 3570. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/38 of 2004) Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court No. II , Mumbai as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the Employers in relation to the management of Naval Dockyard and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 28-11-2007.

2 "Whether the workmen Ms. Asha Joshi and Sushil Kumar Bhatt are entitled to be regularized in service? 3. Relief.

[No. L - 14012/12/99- IR(DU)] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALNO . 2, MUM BAI PRESENT

A. A. Lad, Presiding Officer Reference No. CGIT - 2/38 of2004 Old Ref. CGIT - 2/155 of 1999

Employers in Relation to The Management of

NavalDockyard

TheAdmiral Superintendent

NavalDockyard

10. Mr. Mund has contended that they are working on the typing work since 1-5-87 and 26-7-87 respectively on contract basis and are being paid Rs . 3 per page . As such they are not the workmen . On the other hand Mr. B.K. Pd. has refuted the above contentions stating that they are in fact workmen as they were doing the typing work at the rate of Rs . 3/- per page which goes to show that they are doing work of typing. It is an admitted fact that both the workmenhavebeen working as typist or doing typing work with the respondent from 1-5-87 and 26-7-87 respectively till now as mentioned above i.e. to say they have been working for the las . 20 years with the respondent without [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

Western Naval Command

Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg Fort, Mumbai -400023

And

Their Workmanı Shri M. S. Kadam C/o. Smt. Yashoda Gunaji Shelar Ramnath Gosavi Chawl No.4 JawaharNagar Pipe Line , Khar(E) Mumbai 400051 .

APPEARANCES:

For the Employer : Mr. N. V. Prabhu Representative For the Workmen : Mr. M. B. Anchan, Advocate Mumbai , dated 24th October , 2007

AWARD

Matrix of the facts as culled out from the reference are as under:

1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, by its Order No.L- 14012/ 12/ 99 - IR( DU)] dated 21. -07-1999 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section (1 ) and sub - section 2(A) of Section10 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the Admiral Superintendent, Naval Dockyard , Mumbai in imposing the punishment of compulsory retirement to Mr. M. S. Kadam, ex -unskilled labour w. e.f. 29-09-1997 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"

2.M.S. Kadam was engaged as labour in the office of Superintendent , Naval Dockyard , Mumbai in the year 1982. Vide Statement of Claim (Exhibit-6) Kadam contended that he was chargesheeted by the Naval Dockyard dated 11-7-96 alleging, on 26-9-95 at 9.15 hours , he was found opening DAS office with duplicate keys for stealing the answer sheets for examination to be conducted on that daywhich was witnessed by Cdr . C Soares OICDAS which wasunbecoming ofa Government servant violating Rule 3 (i) ( iii) ofCCS (Conduct ) Rules 1964. He had replied that chargesheet however his reply being not satisfactory inquiry was held on the said chargesheet by the Inquiry Officer appointed by the Disciplinary Authority . It is contended by Kadam that in the inquiry , he was found not guilty. However disagreeing to that , the Disciplinary Authority held him guilty for the charge amounting to misconduct and imposed a penalty of his removal from service on 18-9-97. Against the order of the Disciplinary Authority, the Appellate Authority by the order dated 11-3-98 modifying the order ofDisciplinary Authority imposed the penalty of compulsory retirement from service . It is

9963

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

contended that Kadam raised dispute on the penalty of compulsory retirement with A.L.C. (C), Mumbai but ended in failure . It is contended that , management's action is arbitrary one. It is contended that the punishment imposed isdisproportionate consequently require to set aside with direction to reinstate him with full back wages .

3. Management resisted the claim of Kadam by filing WrittenStatement (Exhibit -7 ) contending that , the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the reference as Kadam is not a ' workman ' and that management Naval Dockyard is not an ' industry' . It is contended that management being not engaged in commercial activity nor a commercial enterprise is not an' industry' and that Kadam being a Civil Servant, is not a ' workman ' . Consequently management contended that, on this sole count, the reference be disposed of. It is further contended that the Inquiry Officer exonerated the delinquent employee . However considering the sufficient direct evidence against him, the Disciplinary Authority held him guilty in terms of Rule - 1,5 ( ii) of CCS (CC andA) Rules 1965. It is contended that on humanitarian grounds the penalty of dismissal was reduced to compulsory retirement by the Appellate Authority . It is contended that Kadam was seen by Soares opening the office with duplicate keys in order to steal the answer sheets, which was grave misconduct in Naval Department, involving in moral turpitude therefore , the punishment of compulsory retirement is proportionate . Consequently prayed to dismiss the claim of Kadam in limine .

4. By rejoinder (Exhibit - 9) Kadam contended since his grievances were not entertained by the A.L.C. (C) and that in that light the Ministry formed the schedule and referred it for adjudication , indicative to show that management is an industry and that he is a workman. He contended that, one sided oral evidance of Cdr . Soares is not sufficient to prove the offences . Consequently reiterating the recitals in the claim he denied the averments in the Written Statement .

5. Inview of above pleadings my Learned Predecessors framed issues at Ex- 12 . Initially my Predecessors allowed reference and directed first partyto reinstate second party workman by passing Award dated 19-08-2002. Said was challenged by first party by Writ PetitionNo. 322 of2003. While deciding said Writ, Hon'ble High Court remanded reference back for adjudication observing that Tribunal has not recorded any findings on perversity of findings and directed to record findings on enquiry whether it was conducted in " violation of prineiples -of natural justice " or by " fairplay " and whether findings are perverse . As a result of that reference was registered on the file of this Court . Parties were invited to attend the reference as per directions given by Hon'ble High Court. Accordingly parties attended and by Ex -36 management informed that it want to argue the matter and indirectly suggested that , he do not want to lead any additional evidence now, which was not objected by the 9964

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1,1929

Issue No. 3:

workman . Then both submitted written arguments i.e. by second party at Ex-37 and at Ex -39 by the first party. On the basis of said , I framed issues and answer as follows:

ISSUES

FINDINGS

Yes.

(1) Whether enquiry is fair and proper and was complied by following the principles ofnatural justice?

No.

(ii) Whether findings perverse ?

No.

(iii) Whether punishment awarded by disciplinary authority is just and proper?

(iv) What order ?

Punishment of compulsory retirement is quashed and set aside directing first party to take second party inthe employment and pay 50% backwages.

REASONS

Issues Nos .1 and 2 :-

6. As far as this issue is concerned , both decided to rely on enquiry proceedings which is filed at Ex -B . Besi.des in Written Argument Ex-37 second party has specifically contended that , he is not challenging the enquiry and findings given by Inquiry Officer . So what ever enquiry is placed on record is admitted by the second party . He has not grievances about the enquiry and even about the findings given by Inquiry Officer . So when Second party workman admits the enquiry vis- a-vis findings of the Inquiry Officer , questioning it again , have no meaning . From the Written arguments I find that , second party is challenging the decision taken by the Disciplinary Author ity who turned down the findings of Inquiry Officer and hold guilty of charges and punished second party . According to me that portion i. e. latter portion of the action taken by first party against second party through Disciplina.ry Authority is under challenge and not enquiry and findings ofthe Inquiry Officer .

8. First party placed reliance on the decision taken by Disciplinary Authority who did not consider the findings ofthe Inquiry Officer and decided that, the charges levelled against workman were proved independently but without any fresh evidence than what was recorded by Inquiry Officer. That incans Disciplinary Authority while passing order of Compulsory retirement based on the evidence before the Inquiry Officer . It is pertinent to note that, on the basis of said the Inquiry Officer concluded second party "not guilty " of charges . In that angle , if we peruse the inquiry proceedings placed on record with Ex-8 we find , main witness namely Mr. Tikam and Mr.Soares does not speak about second party's alleged act of making attempt to open the lock with duplicate key and it is not proved . Both are not referring what act was done by concerned workman . They are not naming the concerned workman saying that, he indulged in making an attempt to open the lock with duplicate key. On the contrary , nobody has stated that, they have found second party workman making an attempt of opening lock with duplicate key. It is matter of record that second party was working there . As a result he was supposed to be present in the office and when withess Soares visited the office he found second party in the office . He did not note any abnormal activities done by second party during the period . Even he took physical search of Mr. Kadam and Mr.Tikam by asking them to remove their clothes . Even he brought this in to the notice ofASD but did not hand over them to Police . He admits that, he did not lodge complaint with police . No any other proceeding admittedly was initiated against them expect this one . As on the basis of this evidence only Disciplinary Authority set aside the findings of Inquiry Officer and observed Second party guilty of the charges . Moreover while assessing like that it is not brought on record that second party was taken in confidence at that stage and was made aware of the stage . It is to be noted that, said Tikam is not examined by first party . It is not shownby first party that on what basis competent authority turned down the findings of the Inquiry Officer and observed second party guilty of the charges. Infact it was the duty of the first party to show that , Disciplinary Authority was having reason to observe second party guilty of the charges . Besides it was expected from the first partyto show, what was ignored by the Inquiry Officer and what was revealed by the Disciplinary Authority while considering the same evidence in the appeal preferred by the manageme " . Besides it is not explained what reason arised for the Disciplinary Authority to reconsider the findings given by Inquiry Officer and reverse it ? All these things are not explained . When all these things are not explained and the evidence which discussed above does not permit to conclude that charges levelled against concerned workman are proved . In my considered view,

ndings given by Disciplinary Authority observing findings 7. The findings of the Inquiry Officer reveal that , second party is not guilty of the charges. We find said finding on page 24, 25 ofEx- B. That is also not disputed by the first party . Hon'ble High Court remanded matter back to decide the point whether enquiry is conducted ir violation of principles of natural justice and whether findings are perverse . As far as that aspect is concerned , second party is not disputing the enquiry or way in which it was conducted vis - a-vis the findings of the Inquiry Officer. Even on that point first party has not contended anything and added any evidence at this stage so I conclude that enquiry is fair and proper and findings of Inquiry Officer are not perverse.

by Inquiry Officer are " not proper " , has no meaning.

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

It is not explained why Disciplinary Authority concluded like that and reversed the findings of the Inquiry Officer ? It ismatter of record that same evidence was before Inquiry Officerandbefore that of Disciplinary Authority and even before me . Then it was expected from Disciplinary Authority to explain and give reason as to why and on what basis he decided differently than the decision given by Inquiry Officer where Inquiry Officer found concerned workman not guilty on the same ? Moreover the case made out by witness Tikam with chargesheeted employee Kadam that, both were there who where trying to search note of Rs.100 lost by witness Tikam. Even witness Tikam made out same story supported by chargesheeted employee , On record it came. When that is the situation , and facts on record, question arises how Mr. Basin who acted as a Disciplinary Authority observed charges proved against second party which were confirmed again by superior authorityMr. Tandon ? No specific reason is given by first party as to how Mr. Tandon and prior to that Mr. Bhasin noted findings against the findings of the Inquiry Officer ? Infact same evidence was before Inquiry Officer . He recorded it . He discussed it and concluded second party "not guilty" . It is pertinent to note that on the same evidence how Mr. Bhasin and Tandon turned down the findings of Inquiry- Officer and maintained the order of removal passed by Bhasin on the same evidence referred by Inquiry Officer? So all these reveals that, farce was made by the first party just to suit its purpose to remove second party from the employment asking him to retire compulsorily. So I conclude that decision taken by the first party on the basis of said findings of Bhasin and Tandon and asking him to retire compulsorily is not just and propег . So I answer this issue to that effect .

Issue no. 4:

9. When first party failed to establish that, second party should be asked to retire compulsorily without any reason , I arn of the view that, he must be reinstated.

10. It is matter of record that from 1997 second party is not in the employment. It is matter of record that, first party is aGovernment undertaking where second party did not work from 29-9-97 . We are at the end of 2007. This matter is pending here for last 10 years initially in the form oforiginal reference and then in the form of retrial or the basis of the decision given by Hon'ble High Court in Writ Petition No. 322 of 2003. It is matter of record that for that second partydid not pray any more monetary benefits and did not make out any specific case about his financial crisis faced by him during this period by stepping in to witness box before this Tribunal . Even he did not pray specifically for backwages by stepping in to witness box and by making any specific case . Considering that first party is a "Government undertaking" and that " no specific case is mada out by both " and looking that decision taken by first party against second party has no sound reasoning , I conclude that , second party mustbe reinstated with 50% backwages . Hence the order:

9965

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

ORDER

(1) Reference is partly allowed .

(2) First Party is directed to reinstate second party workman Shri M.S.Kadam on his original post and permit him to work till his age of superannuation.

(3) First party is_also directed to pay second party workman Shri M.S.Kadam 50% backwages from 29-09-1997 tillhe is reinstated and continue him till he attains age of superannuation in regular salary.

Date: 24-10-2007

A.A. LAD, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3571, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार केन्टोनमेन्ट बोर्ड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 9/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-14012/33/2003- आई. आर. (डी.यू.) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 28th November, 2007 S.O. 3571.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 9/2004) Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court , Kanpur , as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cantonment Board and their workman , which was received bytheCentralGovernment on 28-11-2007.

No. L- 14012/33/2003 - IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI R. G. SHUKLA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, SHRAM BHAWAN , KANPUR

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO.9 OF 2004

Inthe matter of dispute between :- Sh Usuf Khan S/o L. Ali Mohammad VillageAurangabad P.O. Aurangabad District Mathura And

TheExecutive Engineer Cantonment Board . Mathura Cantt. Mathura 9966

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

AWARD

1. Central Government, MOL, New Delhi , vide notification No. L- 14012/33/2003 IR(DU) dated 29-1-04 has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :--

"Whether the action of the management of Executive Officer Cantonment Board Mathura Cantt in terminating the services of Sh . Usuf Khan son of Late Ali Mohammad Chowkidar w.e.f. 28-2-95 is legal just ? If not to what releif the concerned workman is entitled ? "

2. The case of the workman in short is that there were various class- IV employee in the opposite party. After calling the names from Employment Exchange and after conducting interview the applicant was offered appointment as Chowkidar by the Executive Officer , Cantonment Board Mathura vide its order No. 1/15/484 dated 30-11-93 in the prescribed scale ofpay viz 750-12-870-СЕ.В.-- 14-940 plus allowances as admissible from time to itme . It has also been alleged that the vacancy against which the applicant was appointed was caused due to retirement of Sri Misela Chowkidar and as per condition of appointment the applicant was working against the permanent post .

3. It has further been pleaded that he was on probation for a period of one year from the date ofjoining the duties . Workman joined his duties on 1-12-93 and completed probation period satisfactorily . As per the condition of appointment after completing the period of probation he became a regular and permanent workman w.e.f. 1-12-94 . Unfortunately the services of the workman were terminated on 28-2-95 on false ground of surplus on the basis of reduction of staff strength of the post of Chowkidar. It is also pleaded by the workman that the absorption of surplus staff was needed be the taken up with the sister officers for his absorption against the available posts/ vacancies or the name of the applicant was to be referred to the Central Surplus Cell in the Home Ministry which operate the scheme of managing alternate jobs for surplus employees . The opposite party vide letter dated: 28-1-95 changed the applicants designation from Chowkidarto Safaiwala was reversion without following any procedure known to law was lawful and arbitrary and to the disadvantage of the applicant . The opposite party lodged a false FIR against the workman on account of retaliation as he filed a case before ALC( C) , Mathura . The officers of the opposite party also became annoyed and on account of their illegal action the workman had to suffer a lot and ultimately he was exonerated of the charges vide judgment and order dated 4-12-02 passed by Additional Sessions Judge-3 Mathura . It has also been pleaded by the workman that he has worked continuously from 1-12-93 to 28-2-95 and had worked more than 240 days therefore the termination of his service is in breach of provisions of Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act as neither any notice , notice pay nor retrenchment compensation was offered by the employer at the time of his retrenchment . The termination of his service is bad in law

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] and the workman is entitled to be reinstated in service with full back wages and continuity of service.

4. On the other hand the claim of the workman has been opposedby the opposite party vehemently on variety of grounds interalia alleging therein that the employment of the applicant was governed under the provisions of Cantonment Fund Servants Rules , 1937 framed under the provisions of Cantonment Act. , 1924, and that it was specifically mentioned in the appointment offer that the appointment of the applicant as chowkidar is on temporary basis and that the probation period shall be of one year from the date ofjoining. It has been pleaded by the opposite party that applicant joined duties with false foreged and fabricated documents . Applicant has not completed the probationary period as before the completion of the probation period one post of Chowkidar was abolished by the GOC in Chief and as the applicant was the junior most his services were deemed to be terminated from the date the said post was abolished and the applicant was informed accordingly thus his services came to an end on or about 27-8-94 . The applicant was provided with offer for the post Safaikarmchari . It has been pleased that since the appointment of the workman was as Temporary Safaiwala was temporary in nature only till 28-2-95 no question ofhis absorption any where as of right arises at all . Opposite party also pleads that the applicant is stopped to claim reinstatement to the post of Chowkidar and that too w.e.f. 1-3-95 as he had already left the said post much before 28-2-95 and after his consent letter dated 1-9-94 to 28-12-95 he worked as Safaikarmchari . As the post of Chowkidar was abolished much before completion of probation period of the workman as such he cannot be reinstated on the abolished post . The provisions of Section 2(oo) and 25F of the Act do not apply to the case of the workman. On the basis of above , it has been pleaded by the opposite party that the claim of the workman is not mantainable being devoid of merit and is liable to be rejected.

5. It may be pointed out that after exchange of pleadings and documents between the parties the case was posted for evidence of parties . Since management failed to adduce their evidence they were debarred from adducing evidence by order dated 13-7-05 passed by the tribunal . Thus there remains no evidence from the side of the management whereas the workman has adduced his evidence as W.W. 1 and has filed certain documents in support of his claim.

6. The tribunal heard the arguments of the parties at length and have also perused the records of the case carefully.

7. From the record and evidence of the workman it will be examined if the workman has been able to substantiate his claim . In his examination in chief the workman has admitted on oath that he received appointment letterdt. 30-11-93 and on the basis of appointment order he joined duties on 1-12-93 at the post ofChowkidar and continued to work at the said post till [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

28-2-95. He goes on to state that thereafter his services were removed and that removal is not on record . He further deposed tha he was appointed on the retirement of one Masiha Chowkidar and that no notice or retrenchment compensation was ever offered by the opposite party at the time of removal from service . In his cross examination he has admitted the fact that on the basis of letter dated 27-8-94 he worked as Safaikarmachari under the oppposite party on the basis of his consent . He also admitted that the post of Chowkidar was abolished and has also admitted his signature on document paper no . 6. He has also stated that while extending his consent he requested to work at the post of Chowkidar . He also admitted the fact that before removal from the psot of chowkidar he received letter dated 28-1-95 and expressed his ignorance whether he worked on that posttill28-2-95.

9967

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

नई दिल्ली, 28 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ..3572.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बेतवा रिवर बोर्ड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार, औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम् न्यायालय कानपुर के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 156/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/4/98 - आई. आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 28th November , 2007 S.O. 3572.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 156/98 ) Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , Kanpur as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Betwa River Board and their workman, which was received bythe Central Government on 28-11-2007 .

[No. L-42012/4/98 - IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRR.G SHUKLA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, KANPUR Industrial dispute No. 156 of 1998 of dispute between :-

106/371 Heeraganj

ShKamlesh Kumar Jain

through Sri B.P. Pandey

Kanpur

And

ChiefEngineer

Betwa River Board

Nandanpura Colony

8. Thus from the solitary testimony of workman it emerges out and stands proved that the post off Chowkidar was abolished by the opposite party and the workman was offered the post of Safaikarmchari and that he also worked as Safaikarmchari till 28-2-95. It is also clear from his evidence that he raised the present industrial dispute after 28-2-95 claiming that his removal from the post of chowkidar is bad in law . In the schedule of reference order also speaks about the workman's removal as Chowkidar w.e.f. 28-2-95 is legal and just. In the facts and circuntstances and also in the light of evidence of the workman the tribunal isnot readyto believe the case of the workman that he was working as Chowkidar on 28-2-95 specially when it has been admitted by the workman in his cross examination that after the post of chowkidar abolished , he was offered the post of Safaikarmchari and he worked on that very post with that designation . If it is so how the workman can be presumed holding the post of Chowkidar on 28-2-95 and when he was not working as such his claim that he was removed illegally from the post of Chowkidar w.e.f. 28-2-95 stands demolished from his own evidence . As the workman was not working as Chowkidar the action of the management as referred to in the schedule of reference order cannot be said to be either illegal or unjustified.

9. Workman has not whispered even a single word about his working as Safaikarmchari either in his statement of claim or in his examination in chief. Rather he has demolished his case while admitting the fact that he also worked as Safaikarmchari , in his cross examination .

10. As Safaikarmchari he had never completed 240 days therefore, provisions of sections 25F I.D.Act cannot be made applicable in his case nor he can be granted any advantage of it in the absence of pleading and evidence . Hiscase is also not covered within the term retrenchment as defined under Section 2( 00) of I.D. Act , 1947. ۱۰ 11. For the reasons discussed above , it is concluded that the workman has not been able to substantiate his claim and as such he is not entitled for any relief as claimed by him.Accordingly reference is decided against him.

R. G. SHUKLA, Presiding Officer 4935 G1/ 07-22

Jhansi

AWARD

1. Central Government, MOL, New Delhi , vide notification No. L-42012/4/98 IR (DU ) dated 11-8-98 has referred the following disputerfar adjudication to this Tribunal :-

"Whether the action of the Chief Engineer , Betwa River Board Jhansi in refusing to reemploy their workman Sh. Kamlesh Kumar Jain is legal and justified ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled ?

2. After giving anxious consideration to the terms ofschedule of reference order, the tribunal is of the firm opinion, that the same is not covered either under Section 2-Aof the Industrial Disputes Act nor the same is covered under Section 2 (k) of Industrial Disput . Act, 1947, within the meaning of Industrial Dispute as defined in both the 9968

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

above sections of the Act , therefore , on the basis of above reference order the workman cannot be granted any relief. From the terms of reference order it is also not specifically clear as to whether or not the employer has terminated the services of the alleged workman . Refusing to reemploy the alleged workman cannot be termed to be a retrenchment or industrial dispute . Even otherwise no particular date has been mentioned in the reference order , therefore , from this point of view also reference order is held vague and meaning less.

3. For the reasons explained above , it would be completely futile exercise on the part of the tribunal to touch the merit of the case particularly when it has been held that there exist no valid industrial dispute between the parties . Therefore , it is concluded that in the absence of valid industrial dispute , workman cannot be granted relief in his favour has been claimed by him in his statement ofclaim.

4. Lastly it is held that the schedule of reference order is vague and meaning less, and that no industrial dispute exists between the contesting parties as such alleged workman cannot be granted any relief from the tribunal. Reference is answered accordingly against the alleged workman .

R.G. SHUKLA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 28 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3573.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आर्केलोजिकल सर्वे ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 93/2000) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -42012/105/2000-आई. आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 28th November , 2007 S.O. 3573.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 93/2000) Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Archaeological Survey of India and their workman , which was received bythe Central Government on 28-11-2007.

[No. L-42012/ 105/2000- IR ( DU) ]

SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRIR. G SHUKLA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT, KANPURU.P. Industrial Dispute No. 93 of2000

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] BETWEEN:

Dy. Superintending Archaeological Chemist Archaeological Survey of India , Delhi Gate Agra Fort , AgraU.P. And Harender Singh C/o Ashok Kumar Singh 80 Lauris Complex , Namner, AGRA U.P.

AWARD

1. Central Government , MOL, New Delhi vide notification No.L- 42012/ 105 /2000 - IR(DU) dated 29-8-2000, has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

"Whether the action of the management of Dy. Suptd . Archaeological Chemist , Air Pollution Monitoring Laboratory Branch Agra in terminating the services oftheir workman Sh . Harender Singh w. e.f. 31-10- .99 is legal and justified? If not to what relief the workman is entitled ? "

2. The Case in short as set up by the workman in his statement of claim is that he was engaged as daily rated employee by the opposite party on 7th July, 1998, and has completed more than 240 days of (continuous service in one calendar year . It has also been pleaded by him that as daily rated employee the opposite party removed him from the service w.e.f. 31-10-99 in violation of the provisions of Sections 25F, 25G and 25H of I.D. Act, 1947. On the basis ofabove , it has been prayed that the workman be reinstated in the service of the opposite party with full back wages and continubty of service.

3. On the other h and the claim of the workman has been refuted by the opposite party on variety of grounds , which need not to be detailed in the light of the pleadings raised by the workman that he was engaged as a daily rated worker by the opposite party during the period 7-7-98 to 31-10-99 .

3. In support of their respective cases contesting parties has adduced documentary evidence as well as oral evidence .

4. Tribunal heard the respective arguments at length advanced by the contesting parties and have also gone through material available on the file.

5. It is the own case of the workman that he was engagea by the opposite party as daily rated employee and this fact has also been admitted by the workman in his oral testimony when during the course of his cross examination he has categorically admitted the fact that he was engaged as casual labour and that he was never issued any written orders by the opposite party.

9969 [ भाग II---खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007 पौष 1 ,-1929

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRIR. G. SHUKLA, PRESIDING OFFICER

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT, KANPUR

Industrial Dispute No. 75 of2006

Inthematter of dispute between:

SriAshokKumar Singh General Secretary AllIndiaArchaeological Survey of India Mazdoor Union , 43/305/18 Nai Awadi Mishan Church

Sikandara,Agra.

And

The Suptd Horticulturist Archaeological Survey of India Horticulture Division No.1 Taj Mahal , Agra

AWARD

1. Central Government , MOL, New Delhi vide notification No.L - 42011 / 14/2006/IR(DU) dated 7-11-2006, has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

6.Now it is settled legal position that a casual labour, daily rated employee , adhoc employee or temporary ernployee has no right to claim public employment through courts dehoring recruitment rules as it would be opposite to the canstitutional mandate and wauld be also violative ofthe provisions of Article 14 of the Consti tution of India. Further if persons of above categories are allowed to continue inpublic employment that would certainly amount to back door entry. Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a land mark Decision in the case of Uma Devi has finally set at rest the controversy holding that no one should be allowd to be in the employment of the establishment without undergoing through selection process . In the instan case it is the admitted position that the alleged workman had never under sent through selection process as per law therefore, he cannot claim employment as a matter of right as he has no lien against any post- and his status would remain as daily rated employee for all times to come . Workman can also not raise any claim against any post particularywhen he was not appointed at any point of time in the employment of the opposite party as per recruitment rules . If it is so in that event it would be futile exercise to touch other points on merit of the case as his status is not going to be changed at all .

"Whether the action of the management of ASI Agra in terminating the service of Sri Ramesh S/ o Jwala Prasad and 9 others as per Annexure w.e.f. 1-10-2004 is legal and justified? If not to what relief the concernedworkman 10 workman are entitled?

7. Having concluded that the workman was a daily rated employee, he cannot claim employment through the present reference nor he can be granted any relief by the tribunal Reference is therefore decided against the workman and in favour of the opposite party holding that the workman is not entitled for any relief as claimed by him.

R.G. SHUKLA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 28 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3574.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार आर्केलोजिकल सर्वेऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 75/2006) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-42011 / 14/2006- आई. आर. (डी.यू.) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी.

New Delhi , the 28th November , 2007

2.Briefly stated facts set up on behalf of the workers involved in the present dispute is that all the workers remained in the employment of the opposite party as a daily rated employee w.e.f. 1986 and completed 240 days of continuous working in each calendar year as casual employee. It is also pleaded that during the period they remained as casual employee opposite party started regular appointment by direct recruitment . On account of animosity the employer terminated the services of the workers involved in the reference order w.e.f. 1-10-04 in violation of the provisions of Sections 25G , 25F and 25H of the Act . It has also been pleaded by the workers that the opposite party has regularised the services of various casual employee working under them f. 1986. On the basis of above pleadings it has been - prayes that they be directed to be reinstated in the service and further a direction be issued for their absorption in regular service of the opposite party with full back wages continuity of service and other benefits attached with the post.

S.O. 3574.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 75/2006) Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Archaeological Survey of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 28-11-2007.

3. The claim of the workers have been denied by the opposite party in their reply on a number of grounds . But no fruitful purpose would be served if the same are reiterated in view of settled legal position that daily rated employee has no legal right either to claim employment or regularisation of their service .

[No. L-42011/14/2006- IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

4. It has been admitted by the workers in their pleadings that they were working under the opposite party 9970

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

as casual labour. It is also admitted by them that the opposite party adopted recourse of direct recruitment during the period they remained in the employment of the opposite party. It is a matter of common knowledge that no one can be allowed to remain in public employment unless he has undergone through selection process . Casual employee has no right or authority to claim employment as a matter of right as he is not having any lein against any regular post . This position has been made quite clear by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the landmark decision of Uma Devi . The law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India apply with full swingto the facts and circumstances of the present case specially when it is admitted to the workers that they worked as daily rated casual employce with the opposite party.

5. For the reasons discussed ahove , it is held that the workers involved in the reference order are not entitled for any relief as their status will remain as casual employees for all times to come unless they are duly selected through regular recruitment process . Reference is answered against the workers and in favour of opposite party .

R. G SHUKLA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3575.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार साउथ सेन्ट्रल रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , बेंगलौर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 34/1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-41012/ 134/1993- आई आर(बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 29th November , 2007 S.O. 3575. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 34/1997) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of South Central Railway, and their workman , received by the Central Government on 29-11-27 .

[No. L-41012/134/1993 - IR (B - 1 ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE

Dated: 5th November, 2007

PRESENT

Shri A.. Siddiqui , Presiding Officer C. R. No. 34/1997

IIParty

IParty

The Chief Workshop Manager , South Central Railways , Hubli Workshop, Hubli -580020

Shri M. S. Havalad, Girinichanial, Near Gondate House , Karwara Road, Hubli-580029

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub- section 2A of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L- 41012/ 134/93 - IR (B - 1) dated 5th May, 1995 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of South CentralRailway in the dismissal of Shri M. S. Havalad w.e.f. 7-11-1997 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled ? "

2.A charge sheet as well as imputation of statement dated 8/9-11-1978 came to be served upon the first party as per Annexure 1 & II as under :-

Annexure- 1

That the said Shri M. S. Havalad , T. No.4448, Riv (BMP), Boiler Shop of Hubli shops committed serious misconduct in that he was found in unlawful possession of Railway property viz . 7 Iron Angles on 5-7-1978 at about 17.15 hours at North Gate of Hubli workshops and thereby he contravened Rule 3.1.(i) of Railway Services Conduct Rules , 1966.

Annexure- II

Shri M. S. Havalad , T. No.4448 is working as a Riv (BNP) in Boiler Shop of Hubli workshops . On 5-7-1978 at about 17.15 hours he was apprehended by Shri M. R. Mujawar and Shri S. Y. Naduvinakeri RK on duty at North Gate of Hubli Workshop while he was in unlawful possession of 7 Iron Angles . The said Iron angles were packed in paper and rolled in his Rain Coat and secured in the cane basket fixed to his cycle bearing No. 85585 ' D ' , size No. 22 with the name on the handle of the cycle as S. S. Havallada. SIPF Shri K. Doraiswamy seized the property under a panchanama in the presence of two witnesses and arrested Shri Havalad , the accused employee . A case ofcrime No. 6/78 under Section 3(a) of PP(UP) was registered at the workshop post . SIPF Shri S.M. Ganjawale further conducted the enquiries which revealed that the said Shri Havalad the accused employee was guilty of the offence of having been caught at the North Gate with the above said Railway property.

3. The explanation offered by the first party in denying the above said charges of misconduct was not found satisfactory , DE was ordered against him and on the basis of the enquiry findings he was dismissed from service w.e.f. 7-11-1979 .

9971

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

6. On 22-1-1999 framed following Preliminary Issue:

"Whether the Second party conducted DE against the first party in accordance with settled principle of law, Railway Conduct & Disciplinary Rules, 1968 and principles ofnatural justice ?"

7. During the course of trial of the said issue , the management examined one witness as MW1 and got marked 12documents at Ex . M1 to M12. The first party also examined himself by way of rebuttal . This tribunal thereafter by order dated 15-06-1999 recorded a finding on the above said issue in favour of the management holding that the Domestic Enquiry held against the first party is fair and proper . Thereafter, bypassing an award dated 14-7-1999 , my learned Predecessor rejected the reference holding that the second party was justified in dismissing the services of the first party for proved misconduct. Aggrieved by the said award the first party approached the Hon'ble High Court in Writ Petition No. 25522/2000 and his Lordship of our Hon'ble High Court by order dated 08-2-2006 quashed the award passed by this tribunal holding that this tribunal was not justified in rejecting the reference mainly on the ground of delay and remanded the matter back to this tribunal for fresh disposal and consideration on the issue that was before this tribunal with an observation that question of delay does not arise for consideration .

8. Subsequent to the remand, both the parties made appearance through counsels and had no further pleadings or evidence to be produced . Then the matter came to be posted to hear the parties on merits of the case .

9. Learned counsel for the first party filed his written arguments. and whereas , learned counsel for the management argued orally.

4. The first party by way of his Claim statement challenged the enquiry proceedings on the ground that it was conducted in flagrant violation of principles of natural justice in as much as he was not provided with adequate and reasonable opportunity to defend himself much less with any document or material or an opportunity to cross examine the management witnesses . He also challenged the enquiry findings alleging that the enquiry officer submitted his report holding him guilty of the charges as desired by the management and the management having acted upon the said report dismissed him from service by an unjust and illegal order of punishment impugned, which order on its face , itself, is bad in law and is liable to be set aside; that he raised the industrial dispute before the labour authorities and on the submission of the failure report , the Government of India has referred the dispute to this tribunal by reference order dated 05-09-1995 . Therefore , the first party contended that he having joined the services ofthe management on 11-7-1957 as a Khalasi , discharged his duties honestly and having excellent record of service, hewas promoted to the cadre Rivettor keeping in view his unblemished service . However , a false charge sheet came to be issued against him and at the result of the conspiracy of certain persons inimically disposed towards him, thereupon, a farce of enquiry was conducted and on the basis of the findings of the enquiry officer an unjust and illegal , order of dismissal was passed against him . He also contended that the punishment of dismissal is shockingly disproportionate keeping in view of the fact that the alleged theft property of Iron pieces was hardly Rs . 8 to Rs.10. Therefore, he requested this tribunal to pass an award in his favour setting aside the dismissal order along with consequential benefits including the relief of reinstatement and continuity of service.

10. Now, therefore , keeping in view the findings recorded by this tribunal on the aforesaid preliminary issue inthe Affirmative in favour of the management , the only two points to be considered were " Whether the enquiry findings suffered from perversity and if not, whether the punishment of dismissal passed against the first party was proportionate tothe gravity of the misconduct committed by him"

5. The management by its Counter Statement however , contended that the past record of the service of the first party was also not satisfactory, he being involved in some theft case in the year 1971 and having committed the misconduct of remaining absent from duty for a period of 9½ days during the year 1971. The management contended that as on 5-7-1978 once again the first party was found in possession of the theft property namely 7 Iron Angles at North Gate of Railway Workshop , Hubli while going out from workshop. Therefore, the DE was conducted against him affording him reasonable opportunity in tune with the principles of natural justice and in the end of the enquiry, enquiry report was submitted holding him guilty of the charges and therefore, the Disciplinary Authority having taken into consideration the material on record and the enquiry report rightly imposed the punishment of dismissal which order of dismissal was again quite commensurate keeping in view the gravity of the misconduct committed by him . The management therefore , requested this tribunal to reject the reference .

11. Learned counsel for the first party in his written arguments while , attacking theenquiry findings submitted that the enquiry officer is required to give a definite finding of guilt whether charge is proved or not proved and in the instant case the enquiry officer himself was not sure if charges against the first party were proved . He recorded the reasonings by exonerating the workman on all aspects but recorded a finding that the charges were proved and the disciplinary authority without going through the findings and the reasonings of the enquiry authority however, passed the impugned punishment order . Learned counsel to support his argument that as per the very observations and reasonings given by the enquiry authority , charges of misconduct of theft leveled against the first party cannot be said to have been proved, took 9972

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] the court through the following observations and reasonings given by the enquiry officer on page 8 of the enquiry report . They run as under :-

documentary evidence produced during the course of enquiry as that based on the aforesaid evidence discussed bythe enquiry officer at length , the enquiry officer rightly arrived at the conclusion that the aforesaid charges leveled against the first party have been proved .

14. On going though the records, I find substance in the arguments advanced for the first party . In order to fix the first party for the misconduct of theft committed by him , the two vital factors to be established by the prosecution would have been the fact of apprehension of first party while committing theft, if not, the fact of recovery ofthe property from the possession of the first party and thenext important factor which must have been established was the fact to be proved that property in question belonged to the railway department. If we go through the very charge sheet filed against the first party, the charge against him is that he was apprehended with the property in question while he was to leave the premises of the Hubli Workshop at its North Gate . Therefore , the first main ingredient to prove the charge of theft against the first party was that he apprehended while committing the theft , isnot at all proved much less leveled against the first party as per the very charge sheet allegations .

" I strongly feel in the face of the above factors which were working against him even from his own version , he should have exercised all care to check up his cycle while taking the same out of the cycle stand. Therefore , it cannot be denied that Shri Havalad at the time of apprehension was not in possession of Railway property , but when the totality of the case is taken into consideration I have to confess that there are certain vital missing links , for example it was not established that Shri Havalad himself put the subject material into the cane basket of his cycle and (2) it is not understood why Shri Mujawar did not take witnesses from among the passing employees at the time and the site of the incident . From the demonstration I conducted in the presence of Shri Naduvinakeri , one of the prosecution witnesses , the charged employee and the defence counsel it was confirmed that there was every possibility for any employee to enter into the cycle stand and handle any cycle other than his own . Therefore , in the face of the strained relations existed between Shri Mujawar and others with the employee , the possibility of playing mischief with the mal intention ofputting the accused into difficulty cannot be ruled out . This factor also merits consideration while disposing of this case . "

12. He also submitted that the reasonings given by the enquiry officer on the point that the property in question did not belong to the railway department and the statement of the management witness by name Shri Mujawar could not have been relied upon as his relations with the first party were strained . Here again he took the court through the observations made by the enquiry officer on page 7 of the enquiry report running as under :-

15. Now, the first important factor to be established bythe management was whether the property in question was the railway property . As could be read from the observations and reasonings given by the enquiry officer on page 7 of the report , all the prosecution witnesses in no uncertain terms have deposed before the enquiry officer that those Iron angles which have been said to be found in possession of the first party did not contain any marks of identification to say that they belonged to the railways . The enquiry officer further having taken into consideration the certificate issued by the witness , Shri Nair observed that as per the above said certificate also it was not conclusively proved that the materials bore any marks of identification and that such materials of Iron do not bear any identification marks indicative of the Railway's properties . However, as argued for the first party after having held that the above said property was not identified to be railway properties , the enquiry officer in the last sentence of the said paragraph inclined to agree with the deposition of the witness , Shri Duraiswamy vide his answer to Q.No. 217 that the material belonged to the railways . Certainly the enquiry officer was not justified in coming to such a conclusion when he himself observed that neither the certificate issued by the Witness , Nair nor the other Prosecution witnesses identified the said property as

belonging to the railways . Therefore , this important factor as to whether the property belonged to the railways, itself, has not been established .

"With regard to the first aspect , all the prosecution witnesses deposed in unequivocal terms that the iron angles in question did not contain any marks of identification to say that they belong to the Railways . Shri Nair, who has frued a certificate in this case also could not conclusively say that the meterial bore any marks of identification . He however, said that the material is of Iron and that such material is available in shops . Although the material in question did not bear any identification marks indicative of the Railways , since the material was taken possession of in the workshop premises , I am inclined to agree with the deposition of Shri Duraiswamy , SIFF that the material belongs to the railways . "

13. Whereas, the learned counsel for the management vehemently supported the findings of the enquiry officer . Hiscontention was that there was sufficient oral and

16. Now, coming to the question of recovery of the property fromthe possession of the first party. The learned counsel for the first party was once again right in contending that the two Panchas in the presence of whom 9973

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

Mr. Mujawar who was the sole eye witness apprehending the first party while taking away the property in question. Infact in the next passage just before recording his findings on page 8 which was taken help of by the first party while challenging the enquiry findings referred to supra, the enquiry officer in no uncertain terms did not believe the story given by the management that the first party was found in possession of the property in question while was about to go out of the North Gate of Hubli Workshop . The enquiry officer in very clear words has observed that when he conducted the demonstration of the spot along with the prosecution witnesses and the first party it was confirmed that there was every possibility for any employee to enter into the cycle stand and handle any cycle other than his own and therefore , in the face of the strained relations existing between Shri Mujawar and others with the first party, the possibility of playing mischief with the mal intention ofputting the first party into difficulty cannot be ruled out. In the last line he observed this factor also merits consideration while disposing of this case and despite making such observations and giving the reasonings as indicated above , the enquiry officer finally recorded a finding that the charges as leveled against the first party has been proved . This is something wonderful and beyond comprehension for the reader who goes through the findings on hand . As noted above, the enquiry officer has given his findings against the management on all the aforesaid three important factors namely , whether the propertybelonged to the railways , whether it was seized from the possession of the first party and whether he was apprehended along with the theft property by Mr. Mujawar . After having given negative reasonings on all these facts, very strangely , the enquiry officer finally holds the first party guilty of the charges and therefore , it was rightly argued for the first party that the findings of the enquiry officer suffered from perversity as they were not only against the evidence brought on record but also against the very observations and reasonings given by the enquiry officer himself. In the result, there cannot be any hesitation in the mind of this tribunal to quash the findings of the enquiry officer as suffering from perversity . When the findings are not sustainable in the eye of law, it goes without saying that the impugned punishment order dismissing the first party from his services based on those findings cannot be upheld and accordingly it is liable to be set aside.

the property was said to have been seized from the possession of the first party have not supported the case ofthe management with regard to the recovery. Here again the learned counsel takes support of the very observations made by the enquiry officer made on page 7 referredto supra . Wherein the enquiry officer in no uncertain terms observed that both the Panchanama witnesses had to depose to the effect that they came to the spot only after the subject incident and hence the question of their witnessing the incident does not arise . He further observed that the deposition of the two Panchanama witnesses and their version with regard to the possession of the seized property was at variance very much materially in that the Witness, Shri Dwarakanath in reply to Question No. 9 stated that the said material viz . seven Iron Angles were in the hands of RPF and whereas , the other witness Shri Shankarashiva in reply to Question No. 46 stated that the material was in the cane basket attached to the cycle above the rain coat . Therefore , the enquiry officer finally observed that it is conspicuous from these replies that though the replies given by the witnesses does not disclose the exact position of seven Iron Angles , they being at variance, the existence of the said material at the spot was established beyond doubt. He did not give further reasonings as to how the existence of material was established on the sport . As could be read from the findings of the enquiry officer he then relied upon the statement of the Witness , Shri Mujawar who is said to have apprehended the first party but as noted above , the reasonings and observations given by him on page 8 are to the effect that the relations between Shri Mujawar and the first party might have been strained and this can be inferred from the statement given by Shri Mujawar in reply to question No. 110 & 111 , wherein he was not sure whether he checked Shri M. S. Havalad (the first party) in the first and second spells while entering to shops . The enquiry officer also passed remarks on the conduct of Mr. Mujawar saying that it is something extraordinary that Shri Mujawar should remember , single out and identify Shri M.S. Havalad out of such a large. number of employees who pass through the north gate and that he is able to remember and recollect this particular point after a lapse of one year which looks odd in the context of the reply to question No. 142 where he says that some inconsistencies were there in his statements because oftime factor of one year . Therefore , as could be read from the very observation by the enquiry officer , the enquiry officer was very much reluctant to rely upon the testimony ofMr. Mujawar who was the sole eye witness to the incident in question . Therefore , from the aforesaid passages from the enquiry report it becomes crystal clear that the enquiry officer neither believed the testimony of management witnesses on the point of recovery of the theft property in question from the possession of the first party nor he trusted the evidence brought on record by the management toprove the fact that the property in question belonged to

17. In the normal course when the dismissal order has been set aside not being sustainable in the eye of law, the only corollary would have been the reinstatement of the first party into the services of the management. However, in the instant case it appearscars that the first party has attained the age of superannuation long back . When he was examined before this tribunal on the point of enquiry on 15-6-1997 he had given his age as 62 years . Therefore, now he must be around about 70 years . In the result, question of his reinstatement in service does not arise .

the railways . He also did not rely upon the testimony of 9974

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

18.Now the next question would be the reliefs to be granted to the first party by way of back wages and other benefits. It is to be noted that the first party was removed from service w.e.f. 7-11-1979 and his appeal was dismissed on 8-7-1980 . As could be read from the written arguments given on behalf of the first party, his father died of prolonged illness on 14-6-1983 and therefore, the first party raised the dispute before the conciliation officer on 2-9-1993 . Therefore , as per the very case of the first party he raised the dispute for the first time on 2-9-1993 i.e. after a gap of about 13 years from the date of his appeal was rejected against the impugned punishment order . Therefore , in my opinion the first party cannot be granted any back wages for the period of 13 years which elapsed between the dale of the above said appeal and the date on which he raised the dispute before the conciliation officer concerned. However, he can be granted back wages subsequent to 2- 9-1993 till the date he attained the age of superannuation , there being no evidence led on behalf of the management to suggest that the first party has been gainfully employed at any point of time subsequent to his dismissal from service . He can also be given the benefit of continuity of service for the above said period . Hence the following award

AWARD

The management is directed to pay full back wages (last drawn wages by the first party) from 02.09.1993 till the date he attained the age of superannuation with continuity of service and all other consequential benefits . The amounts due under the back wages and other benefits shall be paid to the first party within 6 months from the date of publication of this award failing which it shall carry interest at the rate of10 per cent per annum till its realization . No costs .

( Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me. on 5th November , 2007)

A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3576.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 15/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को29-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/208/2003- आई. आर. ( डी. यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 29th November , 2007 S.O. 3576.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 15/ 2004 )of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -curn- Labour Court , No. II , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure inthe industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and their workman , which was received by the Central Governmenton 29-11-2007.

[No. L-40012/208/2003 - IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- II, NEW DELHI PresidingOfficer : R. N. RAI

ID . No. 15/2004

IN THE MATTER OF : -

Shri Joginder Singh , S/ o Chhote Ram , Vill& Post: Kotra,

Distt: Kaithal , Haryana .

VERSUS

TheGeneral Manager , BSNL, Jind,

Haryana.

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L-40012/208/ 2003 [ IR(DU)] Central Governmentdt. 19-1-2004 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder :-

"Whether the termination of service of Sh . Joginder Singh , S /o Shri Chhote Ram, Driver w.e.f. 12-7-2002 by the management of BSNL, Jind is just and legal ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled ." Theworkman -applicant has filed claim statement . In the claim statement it has been stated that the workman was appointed as a casual worker by the management as typist-cum- Clerk from 1995 & the last drawn wages was Rs . 1,400 . It is subrnitted that Shri Raj Pal Malik who was theHead Clerk in the S.D.E. ( Planning) department took an informal typing test , which the workman passed successfully .

That the workman also used to do the work of the Despatch Clerk. The workman has worked in this departmentfrom 5-10-1995 to 30-6-1998 on regular basis .

That the workman used to sign the receipts for the registry sent from the office of BSNL, Jind . The receipts also bears the stamp of the post office , Jind. Copy of the receipts are annexed herewith and marked as Annexure WW 1/1.

That the workman even worked as a typist during the period from 5-10-1995 to 3-6-1998 and used to type letters in English on the typewriter No. 742108. The workman alsoused to type in Hindi and the Hindi typewriter was issued for the first time to the workman after taking signature in [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

the Stock Register . The list of letter Nos. typed by the workman are annexed herewith and marked as WW1/2 .

That the workman used to sign on the Stock Register along with the permanent employees of BSNL, Jind for receiving materials like typewriter , carbon paper, ribbons, eraser, pens , pencils etc. the photocopies of the Stock Register is enclosed herewith and marked as Annexure WW 1/3 .

That the workman was asked to work in telegram department (Targhar) from 1-7-1998 onwards and worked here till 31-5-2001 under the supervision and control of S.D.O. (P), Mr. K.S. Dul . That the workman used to send telegrams and the receipts envisages the signatures of the workman . Copies of the telegrams sent by the workman are annexed herewith and marked as Annexure WW 1/4 . Photocopies of TM Diary are also annexed & marked as Annexure WW 1/5.

That the workman worked in TDM office computer room under the supervision and control of Mr. M.K. Singh from 1-2-2002 to 12-7-2002. The workman used to make account statement on the computer . The workman was made to work 24 hrs . a day in that department . That the workman used to do various miscellaneous works along with the assigned jobs . The workman also used to operate generator through peon when there was no electricity. That proper ' Engine Register ' was maintained in which the starting and closing time of the generator and duration of operation was mentioned. The copies are annexed herewith and marked as Annexure WW1/ 6 .

That the management adopted unfair labour practice and by changing time and again the place of work and department of the workman with the object of depriving him of status and privileges of permanent employee .

That the workman has performed and discharged his duties sincerely with utmost dedication and honesty for a continuous period of more than 7 years . That there has been no complaint against him from any corner .

That the experience of over 7 years is indicative of the fact that the services of the workman are definitely required on day to day basis and the work performed by the workman is of perennial nature.

That it is a matter of great astonishment that in spite of the constant and ordinate services of the workman , the management terminated the services of the petitioner on 12-7-2002 without any rhyme and reason.

It is respectfully submitted that the said termination order was verbal as no written order was given to the workman by the management.

That the said termination of the services of the workman is illegal, unlawful , unjustified, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice.

That the workman served a demand notice dated 30-9-2002 on the management for reinstatement but the 4935 G1 /07-23

9975

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22, 2007/ पौष 1 , 1929

management opted to remain silent . Copy of the demand / notice is annexed herewith and marked as WW1/7 .

Thereafter an Industrial Dispute was raised before Conciliation Officer. However , on account of an adamant attitude of the management , the Conciliation Proceedings failed, resulting into this reference . Copy of the Conciliation Report is annexed herewith and marked as WW1/8 .

That the workman is covered under the definition of workman as defined under Section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It is respectfully submitted that there exists an employee - employer relationship between the workman and the management . That the workman was working under the direct control and supervision of the management . The work done by the workman was assigned bythe management . That the workman used to work within the premises of the management .

That the workman has completed more than 240 days in each of the calendar year without any kind of break.

That the workman was neither issued a chargesheet nor a show cause notice was given before his illegal termination . It is respectfully submitted that even no enquiry was held against the workman before terminating his services .

That the said termination of the services of the workman amounts to " retrenchment " and management has not followed any mandatory provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947.

That the management has not complied with the mandatory provisions as mentioned under Section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 as neither one month's notice was given or wages in lieu of the notice nor retrenchment compensation was given to the workman.

It is submitted that the management has also violated the provisions of Section 25 G of the Industrial Disputes , Act, 1947 by employing and regularizing the services of the persons who were junior to the workman .

It is submitted that the workman was working against the regular and permanent post . That the work is of perennial nature. It is submitted that the job on which the workman was working still exists and even fresh appointment has been made against the said post.

That the workman was not paid equal pay as compared tothe permanent employees though the workman doing the same kind of work as done by the permanent employees. It is submitted that the workman used to receive his salary from the concerned officials under whom the workman used to work. That the action of the management is violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

That the workman used to mark his attendance in a register on regular basis, which is with the management. The workman has orally and verbally demanded for the appointment letter time and again from the management but the demand was not accepted by the management .

9976

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II--SEC . 3( ii) ]

for which period he was employed in various posts as alleged or otherwise . It is further submitted that admittedly asper Shri Joginder Singh own contentions he never worked at one place and has not completed 240 days of service in any calendar year as such the present statement of claim is liable to be dismissed.

That the present reference is liable to be dismissed as Shri Joginder Singh was never employed by the General Manager as such the present claim is liable to be rejected.

The Management has filed written statement . In the written statement it has been stated that the present reference is without application of mind in as much as the appropriate Government without appreciating the fact that Shri Joginder Singh was never appointed by the Answering Management as such which while referring the dispute the appropriate Government has erred in coming to the conclusion that there has been termination of services of Shri Joginder Singh as such the present reference is liable to be answered in negative .

It is denied that Shri Joginder Singh was appointed as a casual worker by the Management as Typist- cum- Clerk in the year 1995 and his last drawn salary was Rs . 1,400/- . It is submitted that Answering Management has no vacancy for Typist - cum - Clerk and it has a regular typist on his roll as such there is no question of Shri Joginder Singh being appointed as a Typist- cum - Clerk casually or otherwise as alleged in the para under reply. Shri Joginder Singh failed to disclose as to till what date he worked as a Typist- cum- Clerk as admittedly it is his own statement that he started working as and Dispatch Clerk from 5th October , 1995 .

That Shri Joginder Singh has not come with clean hands in as much as Shri Joginder Singh has failed to disclose that he was gainfully franchised and had been allotted a STD PCO Booth bearing telephone No. JD -59903 on 2-1-2000 . As such the statements made in statement of claim are contrary to the record . It is submitted that Shri Joginder Singh himself had admitted during the conciliation proceedings of his having applied and allotted STD PCO Booth on 2-1-2000 . It is submitted that the Answering Management failed to understand and appreciate that how come Shri Joginder Singh be employed with the Answering Management when admittedly Shri Joginder Singh is said fact and making a reference to this Hon'ble Tribunal has resulted in grave miscarriage of justice .

It is denied that Shri Joginder Singh was appointed as a casual worker by the Management as Typist- cum- Clerk in the year 1995 and his last drawn salary was Rs . 1400. It is submitted that Answering Management has no vacancy for Typist- cum- Clerk and it has a regular Typist on his roll as such there is no question of Shri Joginder Singh being appointed as a Typist - cum-Clerk casually or otherwise as alleged in the para under reply . Shri Joginder Singh failed to disclose as to till what date he worked as a Typist - cum- Clerk as admittedly it is his own statement that he started working as an Dispatch clerk from 5th October, 1995.

It is submitted that Shri Joginder Singh may have worked under a Contract when he may have signed the receipts as alleged or otherwise . In any case no reliance can be placed on the said receipts, as theydo not bear signatures of any of the officials of the Answering Management .

'That Shri Joginder Singh has failed to produce any letter of appointment etc. or details of his employment as admittedly is the case of Shri Joginder Singh that he was employed as Typist -cum - Clerk after an informal typingtest had been taken. It is submitted that on the one hand Shri Joginder Singh states that he was appointed as Typist- cum-Clerk later on he states that he was appointed as a Despatch Clerk while after he states that he was appointed as a Hindi Typist and that he has also worked in Telegraph Office and subsequently in the TDM Computer Room and used to make statement of accounts on the computer and he also used to operate generator as such it is apparently clear that Shri Joginder Singh was never employed by the Answering Management as alleged or otherwise . It is submitted that the Answering Management had appointed a Contractor for carrying out various activities both the Contractor as well as Answering Management were duly registered under the provisions of Contract Labour Act (Abolition and Regulation Act ) and as per the knowledge of the Answering Management Shri Joginder Singh was employed by the said contractor from time to time . However, the Answering Managerment is not aware of the time period etc. and in any case Shri Joginder Singh had applied for being allotted for a STD PCO Booth which was duły allotted to him and admittedly Shri Joginder Singh was running the said booth as such the statements made in the statement ofclaim are not only false but are also concocted and vague nd ought to be rejected and the present statement of claim hable to be rejected.

It is specifically denied that Shri Joginder Singh worked as a Typist as alleged in para under reply. It is submitted that on the one hand in para No. 3 Shri Joginder Singh has stated that he worked as a Despatch Clerk from 5-10-1995 to 30-6-1998 while on the other hand in the para. under reply Shri Joginder Singh has stated that he worked as a Typist during that very period. The statements made are contrary to one another . It is further stated that the Answering Management had a Typist on its rolls and as such there was no need for Shri Joginder Singh to do the work of a Typist . It is submitted that during the said period Shri Joginder Singh was employed by a Contractor and he may have carried out some work while , the said work was never assigned to him .

That the statements made in the statement of claim are vague and Shri Joginder Singh has failed to show as to

Itis specifically denied that Shri Joginder Singh worked in the Telegram Department form1-7-1998 till [भाग II--खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

31-5-2001. It is specifically denied that Shri Joginder Singh was authorized or qualified to send the telegrarns as alleged orotherwise . It is submitted that no reliance can be placed onthe said documents, which have been annexed as WW1/ 4 & WW 1/5 . It is submitted that no such documents are available in the records of the Answering Management and as such the said documents are of no consequence whatsoever . It is further submitted that during the said period admittedly Shri Joginder Singh had applied for STD- ISD PCO and was running the said PCO as such the statements made are clearly false and concoced.

The Answering Management failed to understand as to how a person can work 24 hours in a day . The statements made are false and concocted and have been made with the sole purpose of prejudicing the mind of this Hon'ble Tribunal .

It is specifically denied that Shri Joginder Singh used to do various miscellaneous works along with the assigned job . It is specifically denied that he was operating generator etc. as alleged or otherwise admittedly the records annexed for the alleged work is for the period 1998-99 and not for later period. In any case no reliance can be placed on the said documents as no such records available in the records of the Answering Management .

It is specifically denied that the Answering Management adopted any unfair labour practice as alleged or otherwise . In fact, it is Shri Joginder Singh who has not come with clean hands in as much as Shri Joginder Singh applied for STD - ISD PCO in the year 1999 and continued to operate the same till October , 2001 as such the statements made are false .

It is specifically denied that Shri Joginder Singh was ever employed as alleged or otherwise by the Answering Management as such there is no question of his performing and discharging duties sincerely as alleged or otherwise.

It is specifically denied that Shri Joginder Singh was employed by the Answering Management for a period of7 years as alleged or otherwise . Shri Joginder Singh was never employed by the Answering Management as such there is no question of his services having been terminated by the Answering management . It is submitted that Shri Joginder Singh has failed to show or produce any documents to establish that the Answering Management had employed him and that he was being paid salary by the Answering Management .

Itis submitted that there was no termination of services of Shri Joginder Singh since he was never employed by the Answering Management as such there alleged termination cannot be illegal , unfair and unjustified.

It isspecifically denied that Shri Joginder Singh is a workman and covered under the definition of the Workman under Section 2 (S) of Industrial Disputes Act . It is specifically denied that there exists any employee - employer relationship between Shri Joginder Singh and the

9977

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007 /पौष 1 , 1929

Answering Management . It is denied that Shri Joginder Singh was working under a direct control and supervision ofthe Answering management and any work was assigned to him by the Management .

It is submitted that since Shri Joginder Singh was never employed by the Answering Management as such there was no question of issuing any chargesheet or show cause notice as there was no question of terminating the . services of Shri Joginder Singh as he was never employed by the Answering Management .

It is submitted that since Shri Joginder Singh was never employed by the Answering Management as such there was no question of terminating his services or complying with the provisions under Section 25 ( F) of the Industrial Disputes Act .

It is denied that the Answering Management has violated the provisions of Section 25 (G ) of the Industrial Disputes Act as alleged or otherwise.

It is denied that Shri Joginder Singh was working against regular and permanent post and that the work is of perennial nature . It is submitted that Shri Joginder Singh was never employed by the Answering Management as such the statements made are false and concocted .

Itis submitted that since Shri Joginder Singh has filed various documents alleged to be from the record of the Answering Management, the Answering Management fails to understand and appreciate as to how Shri Joginder Singh could not file the copy of the Register in which Shri Joginder Singh allegedly used to mark his attendance . The statements made are false and concocted and had been made with malafide intentions and ulterior motives with the sole purpose of prejudicing the mind of this Hon 'ble Tribunal .

Evidence of both the parties has been taken .

Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.

From the pleadings of the parties the following issues arise for adjudication :

1. Whether the workman has completed 240 days work in the years of his employment?

2. Whether the workman is entitled to reinstatement ?

3. To what amount of back vrages the workman is entitled?

4. Relief if any?

ISSUE No. 1.

The workman has filed WW 1/1 from Page 110 Page-48 . These are photocopy documents regarding receipt of register . These are photocopies and bear seal of the Post Office . All these documents are receipt of register 9978

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1.1929

and have been signed by the workman on behalf of the management. The workman has signed the documents on behalf of the District Engineer , Jind. Most of these receipts are on the letter head of the department of Telecommunication of India. These are photocopies which bear seal on the letter head of the management.

An application has been filed for summoning the originals but the originals have not been filed by the management . These photocopies have not been deniedby the management . This relate to the work of the workman in the year 1997, 1998 and 2001 & 2002 .

The workman has filed photocopy documents of stock register . Number and date of the invoice number has been mentioned and the workman has put his signature on these papers . These photocopy documents have been signed by the regular workman also . The workman has stated in his claim statement that he received materials and he put his signatures on the stock register along with regular employees . These photocopy documents have not been denied by the management .

The workman has filed other photocopy documents relating to his work. These are on the letter head of the management . They relate to 1998 and 1999. These documents bear the seal of the management.

Sh . Harish Chandra Tiwari , an employee of the management has filed affidavit on behalf of the workman . He has been summoned by this Tribunal. He has been cross- examined by the management . In his cross- examination he has specifically stated that he saw the workman Sh . Joginder Singh working while he was posted in Jind . Sh . Joginder Singh signed the salary vouchers . This witness has also admitted that a PCO was allotted to St. Joginder Singh from July 1998 to May , 2001. The name ofthe telecommunication Officer , Sh . Kapur Singh Dul aiso appeared in the register where this witness signed . This witness has further stated that photocopy documents from page 121 to 160 bear the signature of this witness as well as Joginder Singh . The signature of Sh . Mangat Ram and Suraj Mal appears on page 138 to 159 .

The management has filed affidavit of officers of the department and they have stated that Sh . Joginder Singh never worked with them .

The workman filed an application for summoning the original documents after conclusion of the evidence . The application was rejected as it was not filed at the proper stage. However , the management has filed reply to the application . The management has denied the existence of photocopies in the written staternent . The workman is not expected to file originals which are in the possession of the management . In ID cases the photocopies , sometimes , have authenticity of the originaldocuments and reliance can be placed on them wd in such circumstances an adverse inference can als drawn . In the instant case one witness Shri Harish Chavira Tiwari , a regular employee has appeard

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] and he has identified his signature as well the signature of the workman on photocopies . In the circumstances the photocopies become admissible in evidence and they are also reliable . From the photocopies annexed with the record it is amply period that these documents have been maintained by the management in the course of transaction .

The management has filed photocopy of the record of a PCO having been sanctioned in the name of the workman. The workman may have obtained a PCO licence and he may have got it run from some of his relatives or family members . The sanction of PCO in the name of the workman is an instance that he performed his duties in the PCO but in view of the admission of the witnesses and relevant documents the workman has been working all along with the management . The PCO allotted to him may have been run by some other man.

The workman has also put his signatures along with the regular employees and officers on certain documents . Sh . Harish Chandra Tiwari has corroborated this fact .

In ID cases only photocopy documents are available to a workman. The originals are always in the possession of the management . The workman cannot be expected to file the original documents . The management has to file original documents. No management will file original documents against its case . In the circumstances the evidenciary value of photocopy documents are to be considered and an adverse inference can be drawn against the management .

In the instant case the workman has filed almost 70-80 documents which are photocopies pertaining to the year 1997 to 2002. Some of these documents are on the letter head of the management and there is seal of the management . The workman has put his signature over that seal on behalf of the management . Such documents are maintained in due course of running of an institution/ establishment . A regular employee has stated that the workman worked with him and signed the registers with him along with the other regular employees . This evidence iends support to the fact that these documents have been maintained by the management and the workman somehow or the other has obtained photocopies .

Itbecomes quite obvious from perusal of the record that the workınan has performed duties under the management from 1997 to 2002. The workman is not expected to file all the photocopies regarding his duties . From the photocopy documents and statement of Sh. Harish Chandra Tiwari , I find it proved that the workman hasworked regularly at least from 1997 to 2002 and he has worked for more than 240 days in almost all the years of his employment.

This issue is decided accordingly . ISSUE No. 2

Itwas submitted from the side of the management that reinstatement is not the only relief in all the cases of [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

illegal termination . Section 11 Aof the ID Act, 1947 provides for payment of compensation also,

Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that coinpensation is payable in cases where an undertaking has become sick or it has been closed or it is in economic loss. It has not been established that the bank is in economic loss and it is a sick Industry.

My attention was drawn by the Ld. Counsel of the workmanto 2000 LLR 523 State of UP and Rajender Singh. The Hon'ble Apex Court ordered for reinstatement with full back wages as the services of the daily wager cleaner who worked for 4 years was dispensed with without following the procedure for retrenchment . In the instant case also no retrenchment compensation has been paid . This case law squarely covers the instant case .

It has been held in 1978 Lab IC 1668 that in case service of a workman is terminated illegally the normal rule is to reinstate him with full back wages .

My attention was further drawn to AIR 2002 SC 1313 . The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that daily wager even if serving for a short period should be reinstated .

Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that in the instant case Sections 25 F, G of the ID Act are attracted.

In section 25 of the ID Act it has been provided that if a workman has performed 240 days work and if the work is of continuous and regular nature he should be given pay in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensation .

It has been held by the Hon'ble Apex Court that there is no cessation of service in case provisions of Section 25 F are not complied . In the instant case no compensation has been paid to the workman .

In case a workman has worked for 240 clays in a year and the work is of continuous and regular nature he should be paid retrenchment compensation . In case retrenchment compensation is not paid Section 25 F of the ID Act is attracted . There is no cessation of his services . He is deemed continued in service in the eye of law. In case there is breach of Section 25 F the service is continued and reinstatement follows as a natural consequence .

ID Act, 1947 has been enacted to safeguard the interest of the workmen belonging to poor segment of society . It appears that legislature wanted that such workmen should not be harassed un- necessarily so section 25 F, U, T and Clause 10 of Vth Schedule have been enacted. The objects and reasons of ID Act, 1947 show that the respondent management should not be permitted to indulge in any unfair labour practice . The workmen should not be engaged for years and then they should be removed all of a sudden. There is provision of retrenchment compensation for his removal . Retrenchment compensation is for compensating him otherwise so that he can survive long interregnum of unemployment . In the instant case no retrenchment compensation has been paid.

Itwas further submitted that the Constitution Bench Judgment has afforded a right accordingto which the

9979

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

government is not precluded from making temporary appointments or engaging workers on daily wages .

The government is at liberty to give temporary appointment no doubt but the mandatory provisions of Section 25 F of the ID Act, 1947 are to be followed and along with retrenchment the management has to pay retrenchment compensation even for temporary employees who have worked continuously for 240 days .

Fixed term tenure appointments and temporary appointments cannot be the rule of public employment . At the time of making temporary appointments Articles 14 & 16 are infringed. There is no constitutional mandate that the government is at liberty to go on giving fixed term appointments for the entire tenure of service .

No suchArticle of the Constitution has been pointed out under which the Government or Public Sector units cancontinue incessantly to give temporary and fixed term appointments again and again . Since fixed term appointments and temporary appointments are not governed by any constitutionalconsti scheme , such discrimination will amount to vicious discretion . The Government of Public Sector unit will go on resorting to the method of pick and choose policy and give temporary and adhoc appointments to their favorites and thus the principles of equality enshrined in the constitution will be given a go bye . Such is not the intent of the Hon'ble Apex Court. However , in this judgment the provisions of the ID Act governing the services of the workman have not been declared un -constitutional . Reinstatement is the remedy provided in the ID Act for breach of several provisions enumerated therein or for breach of various labour welfare legislations ..

Athree Judges bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court has held in 1993 - II - LW that termination of services affects the livelihood of not only of the employee but also of the dependents . So in case of illegal termination of service the workman should be reinstated .

Reinstatement should not be misconceived as regularization . By the order of reinstatement the status quo ante of the workman is restored . He is given back wages in order to compensate him for his illegal dis - engagement . This is a special remedy provided in ID Act and it has not been annulled and set aside by any judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court . The provisions of the ID Act are still constitutional and they are to be given effect too.

Incase the workman is reinstated with back wages the respondents have every right , after payment of back wages and reinstatement, to retrench him validly following the principles of first come last go so that Section 25 , G & H of the ID Act are not violated.

Fromperusal ofthe records it becomes quite obvious that the workman has rendered 7 year service to the management . He is not employed in any establishment .

9980

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

The work is still existing . In such circumstances there cannot be any order for compensation . In case work is in existing , the workman is to be reinstated .

In view of the law cited above and the facts pertaining in this case , the workman is entitled to reinstatement .

This issue is decided accordingly .

ISSUE NO . 3 .

It was submitted by the management that payment of full back wages is not the natural consequence of the order of discharge or dismissal being set aside . It has been held in (2003 ) 6 SCC 141 that it is incumbent upon the labour court to decide the quantum of back wages .

If has been further held in this case that payment of back wages having discretionary element involved it is to be dealt with the facts and circumstances of the case . No definite formula can be evolved .

In 1978 Lab IC 1968 --three Judges Bench of the Hon 'ble Apex Court held that payment of full back wages is the normal rule . In case services have been illegally terminated either by dismissal or discharge or retrenchment, in such circumstance the workman is entitled to full back wages except to the extent he was gainfully employed during the enforced idleness . In the instant case the workman was always ready to work but he was not permitted on account of invalid act of the employer .

In 2005 IV AD SC 39-three Judges Bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court held that reinstatement with full back wages is justified . In this case the workman has performed nmore than 240 days work and he has been retrenched without payment of compensation and pay in lieu of notice .

The workman has rendered continuous service for at least 7 years . He is not employed in any industry or undertaking/establishment . However , he has notdisclosed the source of his livelihood. He may be doing sorne sort of job off and on though he is not employed in any industry.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case the workman is entitled to 25 % back wages .

This issue is decided accordingly.

ISSUE NO . 4 .

From the issue Nos . 1 , 2 & 3 decided above the workman applicant is entitled to reinstatement along with 25% back wages .

The reference is replied thus:-

The termination of service of Sh. Joginder Singh , S/o . Shri Chhotu Ram , Driver w.e.f. 12-7-2002 by the management of BSNL, Jind is neither just nor legal . The management should reinstate the workman w.e.f. 12-7-2002 along with 25 % back wages within two months from the date of the publication of the award .

The award is given accordingly .

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer Date 23-11-2007

[ PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3577. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 21/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/202/2003- आई . आर. ( डी. यू. ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 29th November , 2007 $ .O. 3577.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 21/2004) Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court , No. II , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and their workman, received by the Central Government on 29-11- 2007.

[No. 1. -40012/202/2003 - IR ( DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, NEW DELHI

Presiding Officer : R. N. RAI

ID . No. 21/2004

IN THE MATTER OF :----

Shri Satya Pal , S/ o Shri Bharat Singh R/ o Vill & Post : Babbalpur Tehsil & Distt : Jind

VERSUS

The General Manager , BSNL , Jind , Distt. Bhiwani , Bhiwani ( Haryana)

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L.- 40012/ 202/ 2003 [ IR ( DU)] Central Governmentdt. 19-1-2004 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The point runs as hereunder :-

Whether the termination of service of Sh . Satya Pal Peon-cum-clerk w.e.f. 1-1-1998by the management to BSNL, Jind is just and legal ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled . "

The workman applicant has filed claim statement . In the claim statement it has been stated that the workman joined BSNL as a casual labour as ' Peon-cum- Clerk ' on [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

1-6-1995 in office . His appointment was done by Mr. B. S. Rawat, Accounts Officer . His last drawn salary was Rs . 1,200

That the workman was also made to work as Dispatcher in the same department. That the workman used to make entries in the Dispatch Register andthen sent the letters . The workman also used to make entries of the letters received and then distribute the same in the office . Photocopies of the Dispatch Register are annexed herewith and marked as Annexure WW 1/1 .

That the workman has performed his duties sincerely and with utmost dedication and honesty for a continuous period of more than 3 years and there was no complaint against him from any corner .

That it is a matter of great astonishment that inspite of the constant and ordinate services of the workman , the management terminated the services of the workman on 1-1-1998 without any rhyme and reason .

It is submitted that the said termination order was verbal as no written other was given to the workman by the management. The said termination of the services of the workman is illegal , unlawful , unjustified , arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice .

That the workman served a demand notice dated 26-12-2002 on the management for reinstatement but the management opted to remain silent . Acopy of the demand notice is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure WW 1/2 .

Thereafter an Industrial dispute was raised before Conciliation Officer . However , on account of an adamant attitude of the management , the Conciliation proceedings failed resulting into this reference . Copy of the Conciliation report is annexed herewith and marked an Annexure WW1/3 .

That the workman is covered under the definition of workman as defined under Section 2 (S) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. It is submitted that their exists an employee employer relationship between the workman and the management. That the workman was working under the direct control and supervision of the management . The work done by the workman was assigned by the management . That the workman used to work within the premises of the management .

That the workman has completed more than 240 days in each of the calendar year without any kind of break. That the workman was neither issued a charge sheet nor a show cause notice was given before his illegal termination. It is respectfully submitted that even no inquiry was held against the workman before terminating his services .

That the said termination of the services of the workınan amounts to ' retrenchment ' and the management has not followed the mandatory provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. The management has not complied with the mandatory provisions as mentioned under Section

9981

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

25F of the Act as neither one month's notice was given or wages in lieu of the notice nor retrenchment compensation was given to the workman .

Itissubmitted that the management has also violated the provisions of Section 25 G of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 by employing and regularizing the services of the persons who were juniors to the workman.

That the workman was working against a regular and permanent post . That the work is of perennial nature . It is respectfully submitted that the job on which the workman was working, still exists and even the fresh appointment has been made against the said post .

That the workman was not paid equal pay as compared to the permanent employees though the workman was doing the same kind of work as done by the permanent employees. It is respectfully submitted that the workman used to receive his salary from the concerned officials under whom the workman used to work . That the action of the management violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India .

That the workman used to mark his attendance in a register on regular basis , which is with the management . The workman has orally and verbally demanded for the appointment letter time and again from the management but the demand was not been accepted by the management .

The Management has filed written statement . In the written statement it has been stated that the present reference is without application of mind in as much as the appropriate Government without appreciating the fact that Shri Satya Pal Lather was never appointed by the Answering Management has referred the dispute for adjudication based on the erroneous conclusion that there has been termination of services of Shri Satya Pal Lather as such the present reference is liable to be answered in negative.

That Shri Satya Pal Lather has failed to produce any letter of appointment etc. or details of his employment to make out a case that he was employed as Peon-cum -Clerk. Itissubmitted that the Answering Management failedto understand as to when and how Shri Satya Pal Lather was appointed as a Peon or a Clerk and more so in view of the fact that Shri Satya Pal Lather has failed to disclose his education qualification as to whether he was entitled for being appointed as Peon or a Clerk. It is submitted that the Answering Management had appointed a Contractor for carrying out various a activities . Both the Contractor as well as the Answering Management were duly registered under the Provisions of Contract Labour ( Abolition and Regulation ) Act, and as per the knowledge of the Answering Management Shri Satya Pal Lather was employed by the said Contractor from time to time as such the statements made in the statement of claim are not only false but are also concocted and vague and ought to be rejected and the present statement of claim is liable to be rejected on this sole ground.

9982

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

That the statements made in the statement of claim are vague and Shri Satyapal Lather has failed to show as to for which period he was employed in various posts as alleged or otherwise . It is further submitted that Shri Satyapal Lather only worked with the Answering Management through Contractor as such the present statement of claim is liable to be dismissed .

That the present reference is liable to be dismissed as Shri . Satyapal Lather was never employed by the General Manager , BSNL as such the present statement of claim is liable tobe rejected.

That Shri Satya Pal Lather's claim is bad for delay and latches and is liable to be rejected as admittedly his services were alleged to have been terminated as far back as on 1-1-98 i.e. more than six years old as such also the present reference is liable to be dismissed .

Thatadmittedly the claim of Shri Satyapal Lather is that his services were alleged to have been terminated on 1-1-98 admittedly the Answering Management was not in existence on 1-1-98 as such the present claim is bad for mis -joinder of parties as no claim is maintainable against the Answering Management , which was not in existence on 1-1-1998 .

Thatadmittedly the claim of Shri Satyapal Lather is that his services were alleged to have been terminated on 1-1-98.Admittedly the Answering Management was not in existence on 1-1-98 as such the present claim is bad for misjoinder of parties as no claim is maintainable against the Answering Management .

The appropriate Government having referred the Industrial Dispute to this Hon'ble Tribunal is a matter of record. However , it is submitted that the said reference has been made without application of mind in as much as Shri Satyapal Lather was never employed by the Answering Management as such there is no question of termination ofhis services .

It is denied that Shri Satyapal denied that Shri Satya Pal Lather was appointed by BSNL as a casual labour as Peon- cum-Clerk on 1-6-1995 in the office . It is submitted that in the year 1995, BSNL was not existing. It is specifically denied that Shri Satyapal Lather's appointment was done by Shri B.S. Rawat , Accounts Officer and his last drawn salary was Rs . 1,200 . The Answering Management failed to appreciate whether Shri Satyapal Lather was worked as a Peori or a Clerk as admittedly there are no designations of Peon-cum-Clerk in the Answering Management . However , the workman might have worked for some period through the Contractor.

It is denied that Shri Satyapal Lather was made to work as a " Dispatcher " in the same department . It is submitted that the statements mere are vague and without any basis in as much as Shri Satyapal Lather has failed to disclose as to when and during which period he worked as a Peon- cum- Clerk or a " Dispatcher " . The documents

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] annexed as WW/ 1 are fabricated while the workman was engaged by the contractor.

It is submitted that on the one hand Shri Satyapal Lather has stated that he was employed w.e.f. 1-6-1995 while on the other hand in para under reply he has stated that he worked continuously for a period of more than three years and there was no complaint against him from any concern .

It is submitted that Shri Satyapal Lather was never employed by the Answering Management as such there was no question of his services being terminated . Shri Satyapal Lather never worked for the Answering Management there is no question of terminating his services by verbal or by any other order .

Itis submitted that the said notice of demand is misconceived and without any basis and does not bear even date as to when it was alleged to have been sent . No such document is available in the records of the Answering Management .

The raising of the Industrial Dispute before the Conciliation Officer is a matter of record . However , it is submitted that since Shri Satyapal Lather never worked with the Answering Management there was no question of any conciliation being arrived in the said proceedings . The report of the conciliation officer is a matter of record.

It is denied that Shri Satyapal Lather is covered under the definition of workman as defined under Section 2(S) of the Industrial Disputes Act . It is denied that there exists any " Employee -Employer " relationship between the Answering Management and Shri Satyapal Lather . It is denied that Shri Satyapal Lather was working under the direct control and supervision of the Management and was doing the work assigned to him by the Management .

It is denied that Shri Satyapal Lather completed more than 240 days in each of the calendar year . It is denied that Shri Satyapal Lather never worked with the Answering Management there was no question of Answering Management issuing him a charge-sheet or show cause notice and the Answering Management craves a reference to what is stated herein above in para under replý.

Itis denied that the monthly provisions as mentioned under Section 25( F ) of the Act are applicable . The Answering Management craves a reference to what is stated herein above in para under reply. It is denied that the Answering Management has violated any of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, including Section 25(G) . The statements made are false and misleading and have been made with mala fide intentions and ulterior motives .

It is denied that Shri Satyapal Lather was ever employed by the Answering Management as such there is no question of making any payment as alleged .

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder. In the rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written 9983

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007 /पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

statement . The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement .

Evidence of both the parties has been taken .

Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.

The workman has failed to prove that he has worked for 240 days even by the photocopies filed by him . The application of the workman regarding summoning of the documents carries no meaning , in case he fails to establish byphotocopy documents that he has worked for 240 days . The workman has not filed any other document .

It is settled law that the initial burden to prove that the workman has worked for 240 days in 12 calendar months or in a calendar year is on the workman . The workman has filed certain photocopies documents of TRA record . From perusal of the photocopies it becomes quite obvious that the workınan has worked for 70 to 80 days in the year 1996 and 4 to 5 days in the year 1997 .

Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that he was engaged as Peon- cum-Clerk on 01-06-1995 in the office by Mr. B.S. Rawat , Accounts Officer. His last drawn salary was Rs . 1200. He used to make entries in the dispatch register and then send the letters . He made entries of the letters received and distributed the same in the office . His services were terminated on 1-1-1998 illegally , arbitrarily and without any justification.

It was submitted from the side of the rnanagement that the management has appointed a contractor for carrying out various activities . The contractor as well as the management were duly registered under the provisions of CLRA Act, 1970. The workman may have been employed by the contractor concerned from time to time .

In ID cases even photocopies are admissible in certain circumstances but they must relate to the documents of the management. I have considered even all the photocopies filed by the workman in regard to his work . These photocopies disclose that he has not worked for 240 days either in the year 1996 or in the year 1997. There is no proof of his working in the year 1995 and 1998. He has failed to prove the averments of his claim statement . He is not entitled to get any relief.

The reference is replied thus :-

It was further submitted that the workman has filed this case after a lapse of 6 years . If his services were really terminated on 1-1-1998 he should have raised the matter earlier.

The termination of service of Shri Satya Pal Peon-cum -Clerk w.e.f. 1-1-1998 by the management to BSNL, Jind isjust and legal. The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for .

The award is given accordingly .

Itwas further submitted that in the year 1995 , BSNL was not existing. Shri B.S. Rawat did not appoint him. The workman was never employed by the management and he has not completed 240 days in any years of his employment even though he was engaged through the contractor .

Date: 26-11-2007: R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3578.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 20/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

The workman has filed Paper No. B- 13 to B- 27 in which duties of the workman have been mentioned but the name of this workman does not appear anywhere on the photocopies. The photocopies are on the blank papers up to 17 and from 18 to 28 on the letter head of the Telecommunication of India but the name of this workman does not appear on these papers so these photocopies do not relate to him . He has filed Paper Nos . 29 to 31, he has signed it but writing is on the blank papers . These have not been initialed and stamped by any of the officials of the management. These photocopies contain letter numbers of alınost 70 to 80 days.

[सं. एल-40012/203/2003- आई आर (डीयू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 29th November, 2007 The workman has filed photocopies from 32 to 35 . He has put his own signature above the seal of the management . These photocopies are not on the letter head of the management . The signatures of the workman are different on different papers and these photocopies are for 4 to 5 days in the year 1997 .

S.O. 3578.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 20/2004) Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court No. II , New Delhi , as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2007.

[No. L-40012/203/2003 - IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer The management has not filed the original documents . The originals of the photocopy documents : filed by the workman are not expected to be available with the management . The photocopy documents filed by the workman do not disclose that he has worked for 240 days . The photocopies of TRA annexed with the record by the workman about his working for 70 to 80 days , if these photocopies are relied upon .

4.935 G1/07--24 9984

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N. RAI. I.D. No. 20/2004 In the Matter of:

Shri Sapnesh Kumar ,

S/ o Shri Nafe Singh ,

R/o Om Nagar ,

H. No. 97/11 , Behind Som Nath Mandir , Jind

Versus

TheGeneral Manager , BSNL, Jind, Distt. Bhiwani , Bhiwani (Haryana)

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 40012/ 203/2003 - IR( DU) Central Government dtd. 19-01-2004 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The point runs as hereunder:

"Whether the termination of service of Shri Sapnesh Kumar S/o . Shri Nafe Singh , Wireman w.e.f. 04-10-2002 by the management to BSNL, Jind is just and legal ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled . "

The workman applicant has filed statement of claim. In the statement of claim it has been stated that the work- manwas appointed as a casual workman as " Gate Man " in the year July , 91 on a monthly salary of Rs . 630 p.m.by the management . That the workman was appointed by S.D.O. , Telecommunication Deptt . BSNL, Jind .

That in the year 1992 the work of the workman was changed and he was directed to discharge his duties in the "Switch Room" under the direct supervision and control ofS.D.D. (P). The monthly salary of the workman was fixed atRs.800 p.m.

That in the year 1993-94 the attendance of the work- man was taken in the duty chart of technician's staff. The services of the workman were again changed to the Truck Room (Exchange) and the workman performed his duties under the control and supervision of S.D.O. (Planning). The salary of the workman was fixed at Rs . 900 p.m. It is submitted that the workman used to make entries in the Engine Register regarding starting and closing time of the generator and the duration of operation of the generator .

That the workman has also worked in the Telegram Deptt . (Targhar) during the year 1996 to 1998 under the control and supervision of S.D.O. ( P) at a monthly salary of Rs . 1200 p.m. that the workman used to send telegrams and sign in the Tar Passenger slip .

Thatthe services of the workman were again changed and he was directed to discharge the duties of Wireman w.e.f. 20-11-1998 under the control and supervision of S.D.E. FRS) at a monthly salary of Rs . 1500 p.m.

That the workman used to make entries and put sig- natures in the Jumper Register after finishing the work assigned to him. Copies are annexed herewith and marked as Annexure WW 1/1 .

Thatthe management adopted unfair labour practice by changing time and again the place of work and depart- ment of the workman with the object of depriving him of status and privileges of permanent employee .

Thatthe workman has performed and discharged his duties sincerely with utmost dedication and honesty for a continuous period of more than 11 years . That there has been no complaint against him from any corner.

That the experience of over 11 years is indicative of the fact that the services of the workman are definitely required on day to day basis and the work performed by the workman is of perennial nature .

Thatit is a matter of great astonishment that in spite ofthe constant and ordinate services of the workman, the management did not allow the workman to mark his presence from 12-06-2002 and finally terminated his services of the workman on 04-10-2002 without any rhyme and reason .

That the said termination order was verbal as no written order was given to the workman by the manage- ment . That the said termination of the services of the work- man is illegal , unlawful, unjustified, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice .

That the workınan served a demand notice dated 02-12-2002 on the management for reinstatement but the management opted to remain silent. Copy of the demand notice is annexed herewith and marked as WW1/ 2 .

Thereafter an industrial dispute was raised before Conciliation Officer . However , on account of an adamant attitude of the management , the Conciliation proceedings failed , resulting into this reference . Copy of the Conciliation report is annexed herewith and marked as WW1/3 .

That the workman is covered under the definition of workman as defined under Section 2(S) of Industrial Dis- putes Act 1947. It is respectfully submitted that there exists and employee employer relationship between the workmanandthe management . That the work was working under the direct control and supervision of the manage- ment . The work done by the workman was assigned by the management . That the workman used to work within the premises of the management .

That theworkman has completed more than 240 days in each of the calendar year without any kind of break . That the workman was neither issued a charge sheet nor a show-cause notice was given before his illegal termina- tion . It is respectfully submitted that even no enquiry was held against the workman before terminating his service .

That the said termination of the services of the work- man of the workman amounts to " retrenchment" and man- agement has not followed any mandatory provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947.

That the management has not complied with the man- datory provisions as mentioned under Section 25F of the [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as neither one- month's no- tice was given in lieu of the notice nor retrenchment com- pensation was given to the workman.

It is submitted that the management has also vio- lated the provisions of 25 G of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 by employing and regularizing the services of the personwho were junior to the workman.

It issubmitted that the workman was working against the regular and permanent post . That the work is of peren- nial nature . It is submitted that the job on which the work- man was working still exists and even fresh appointment has been made against the said post.

That the workman was not paid equal pay as com- pared to the permanent employees though the workman was doing the same kind of work as done by the permanent employees . It is submitted that the workman used to receive his salary from the concemed officials under whom the workman used to work . That the action of the manage- ment is violative of Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution ofIndia.

That the workman used to mark his attendance in a register on regular basis, which is with the management . That the workman has orally and verbally demanded for the appointment letter time and again from the manage- ment but the demand was not accepted by the manage- ment.

The Management has filed written statement. In the written statement it has been stated that the present refer- ence is without application of mind in as much as the ap- propriate Government without appreciating that Shri Sapnesh Kumar was never employed/ appointed by the answering management, as such while referring the dispute has erred in coming to the conclusion that there has been termination of services of Shri Sapnesh Kumar , as such the present reference is liable to be answered in negative.

That Shri Sapnesh Kumar was never employed by the answering management. It is submitted that Shri Sapnesh Kumar may have got himself employed with the contractor . It is submitted that erstwhile Department of Telecommunication had entered into an agreement with the contractor to provide various services to DOT. It is submitted that both the provisions of Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act and as such Shri Sapnesh Kumar has no right to employment with the answering management . It is submitted that on the expiry of the said contract all the employees of the said contractor stopped coming and it seems that thereafter Shri Sapnesh Kumar filed the aforesaid case and appropriate government with- out appreciating the said fact on record had referred the present dispute for adjudication , as such also the present reference to this Tribunal is liable to be answered innegative.

That the present petition is bad for non-joinder/ misjoinder of necessary party , as admittedly it is the case

9985

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22, 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

ofShri Sapnesh Kumar that he was working since the year 1992. It is submitted that in the year 1992 BSNL was not in existence , as such the present reference is misconceived and is liable to be rejected.

That Shri Sapnesh Kumar has not completed 240 days . It is submitted that since Shri Sapnesh Kumar was never employed by the answering management and there was no relationship of employer and employee between Shri Sapnesh Kumar and the answering management . It is specifically denied that Shri Sapnesh Kumar and the answering management . It is specifically denied that Shri Sapnesh Kumar was appointed as casual workman as "Gateman" in July 1991 and in the year 1992 he was dis- charging his duties in "Switch Room " and subsequently in "Trunk Room" (Exchange ) or in the Telegram Department as alleged in the statement of claim. It is submitted that the predecessor in interest had appointed a contractor under the provisions of Contract Labour (Regulation & Aboli- tion) Act and both the contractor and the management were duly registered. It may be possible that Shri Sapnesh Kumar may have done some jobs and may have signed some registers , however , that does not mean that Shri Sapnesh Kumar was employed by the answering man- agement, as such the claim of Shri Sapnesh Kumar is not only false but also concocted and vague and ought to be rejected and the present reference is liable to be answered in negative .

That the statements of claim are vague and Shri Sapnesh Kumar has failed to show as to for what period he was employed as alleged in the statement of claim.

In the statement of claim the appropriate govern- ment having referred the dispute to this Hon'ble Tribunal. ismatter of record . However , it is submitted that the said reference has been made without application of mind in as much Shri Sapnesh Kumar was never employed by the answering management and as such there is no question ofhis services .

Thestatement of claim are wrong and denied. It is spe- cifically denied that Shri Sapnesh Kumar was appointed as a casual workmanas " Gateman" in the year July 1991 on a monthly salary of Rs . 630 p.m. payable by the management. It is also denied that Shri Sapnesh Kumar was appointed by SDO , Telecommunication Department, BSNL, Jind .

The statement of claim are wrong and denied . It is denied that in the year 1992 the work of Shri Sapnesh Kumar was changed and he was directed to discharge his duties in the " Switch Room " under the direct supervision and control of SDO ( P) . It is submitted that since Shri Sapnèsh Kumar was never engaged to work in the Switch Room as such , there was no question of his salary being fixed at Rs. 800 p.m.

It is denied that in the year 1993-94, the attendance ofShri Sapnesh Kumar was taken in the duty charge sheet of technician staff. It is specifically denied that again the 9986

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II -SEC. 3 (ii) ]

Itis submitted that since there was no relationship of"Employer and Employee" as such there is no question oftermination of the services of Shri Sapnesh Kumar being illegal , unlawful , unjustified , arbitrary and against the principie of naturaljustice.

services of b Sapnesh Kumar were changed to Trunk Room (Exchange) and that he was under the control and supervision of SDO ( Planning) . The statements made are false, misleading, concocted and vague . It is submitted chat Shri Sapnesh Kumar has failed to show as to from which period ne was working in the Trunk Rooma . It is specífically denied that his salary was fixed at Rs . 900/- p.m. It is also denied that Shri Sapnesh Kumar used to make entries in the Engine Register regarding starting and closing time of the Generator and the duration of operation of the generator .

The issuance of the notice of demand is a matter of record, however, it is submitted that since the said notice of demand was without any basis whatsoever there was no need to replyto the same. The raising of the Industrial Disputes before the Conciliation Officer is a matter of record . However, it is submitted that since there was no "Employer- Employee " relationship between the Answering Manage- ment and Shri Sapnesh Kumar there was no question of any settlement being arrived at.

It is denied that Shri Sapnesh Kumar also worked in he Telegram Department during the year 1996-98 under he control and supervision of SDO (P) at a monthly salary of Rs . 1,200/- p.m. The statements made are false and eon- soeted and without any basis .

It is subentled that since Shri Sapernsh Kumar was never employed by the Answering Management there is no question of changing the duties to Wireman w.e.f. 2-11-1998 under the control and supervision of SDE ( FRS ) is alleged in para under reply . It is also denied that the monthly salary of Shri Sapnesh Kumar was Rs . 1,500 /- p.m.

It is denied that Shri Sapnesh Kumar is covered under the definition of Workman as defined under Section 2 (S) of the Industrial Disputes Act . It is specifically denied that there exits any "Employee Employer" relationship between the Answering Management and Shri Sapnesh Kumar . It is also denied that Shri Sapnesh Kumar was work- ing under the direct control and supervision of the Management and was doing the work assigned to him by the Answering Management . The Answering Management craves a reference to what is stated herein above in para underreply.

It is subedited that the allege documents annexedto anure-WWL ( Collectively) are false and concocted ami have no relevancy whatsoever . No such documents available in the record of the Answering Management . any case the Answering Management failed to under- Jand their applicability in the present case . It is submitted that thert could beccasions when Shri Sapnesh Kumar may have earked under the Contractor whose services have been in accordance with the provisions of Contract abour (Regaistion and Abolition) Aet .

It is denied that Shri Sapnesh Kumar completed more than 240 days with the Answering Management in each of the calender year without any break . It is denied that since Shri Sapnesh Kumar never worked with the Answering Management there was no question of issuing a charge sheet or show cause notice as the services of Shri Sapnesh Kumar were never terminated by the Answering Manage- ment . It is specifically denied that there has been any termination of services of Shri Sapnesh Kumar by the Answering Management and the Answering Management craves a reference to what is stated herein above in para under reply.

Itis dernisothat the Answering Management adopted da labour practices as alleged or otherwise . It is submit- ted that Shri Sapriesh Kumar was never employed by the Answering Management as such there is no question of adopting any unfair labour practices as alleged or oiharwese

It is submitted that since Shri Sapnesh Kumar was never employed by the Answering Management and his services were never terminatedby the Answering Management there is no question the of complying/non- complying mandatory provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act . The Answering Management craves reference towhat is stated herein above in para under reply .

It is denied the Shri Sapnesh Kuinar ever worked for a continuous pro more than Eleven years as alleged in para under r . ply. It is denied that Shri Sapnesh kumar worked for Elt en years which was indicative of the fact that the services of Shri Sapnesh Kumar were definitely on day to day basis and that the work performed by Shri Sapnesh Kumar was of 2 perennial nature .

It is denied that the Answering Management has violated any of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, including Section 25 (G) . The Answering Management craves a reference to what is stated herein above in para under reply .

It is denied that the Answering Managerment did not allow Shri Sapnesh Kumar to mark his presence from 12-6- 2002 and finally terminated his services on 4-10-2002 as alleged in para ander reply . The statements made ir. para under reply are Faise, nisleading and concocted

It is denied that Shri Sapnesh Kumar was working against a regular and a permanent post or that his work wasof a perennial nature or that the said job still exists . It is specifically denied that any fresh appointment has been made as alleged in para under reply . The Answering Managemen! craves a reference to what is stated herein above in para under reply .

Luis submitted that since Shri Sapresh Kuniar never workedwith the singManagement there is no ques- tion of issuanngition order verbal or otherwise as alleged in naraply.

[ भाग II--खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

It is denied that the action of the Answering Management is violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Con- stitution . The Answering Management craves a reference to what is stated herein above in para under reply .

It is denied that Shri Sapnesh Kumar used to mark his attendance in a register on regular basis . The state- ments made are false and concocted and have been made with malafide intention and ulterior motives .

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder. In the rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim state- ment and has denied most of the paras of the written state- ment . The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement .

Evidence ofboth the parties has been taken.

Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.

From perusal of the pleadings of the parties the following issues arise for adjudication :-

1. Whether the workman has completed 240 days work during the tenure of his employment ?

2. Whether the workman is entitled to reinstate- ment ?

3. To what amount of back wages the workman is entitled ?

4. Relief if any ?

ISSUE NO . 1 .

Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that he was appointed as casual labour as Gate Man in the year July, 1991 on the monthly salary of Rs . 630/ - pm by the SDO, Telecommunication Department , BSNL, Jind . In the year 1992 his duties were changed and he was directedto discharge his duties in the Switch Room under the direct control and supervision of the SDO (P) on the monthly salary was raised to Rs.800 /- . He was asked to discharge the duty of technician staff in the year 1993-1994. He per- formed his duties under the control and supervision of the SDO (P) . His salary was raised to Rs . 900/- pm . He has also worked in Telegram Department from 1996 to 1998 urider the control and supervision of SDO (P) on a monthly salary of Rs . 1200/- pm . He worked w.e.f. 20-11-1998 under the control and supervision of SDE ( FRS ) at the monthly salary of Rs.1500/- pm. He used to make entires and put his signatures in the Jumper Register after finishing the work assigned to him . He has completed 240 days in every year for almost for 11 years and his services were verbally termi- nated illegally on 04-10-2002.

It was submitted from the side of the management that the workrnan was never employed by it . He may have worked through the contractor for some period. The docu- ments filed by the workman are false and concocted and are not relevant . No such documents are available in the records of the management . He may have worked under the contractor , whose services have been taken under the

9987

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

previous contract but there is no employer employee rela- tionship and the workman has not completed 240 days in any of the years of his employment .

The workman has filed photocopy documents from PaperNo. 11 to 33. The documents relate to shifting Jumper in 2001 and 2002. MW4 has admitted in his cross examina- tion that the signatures on page 34 and page 36 and 37 at point Lare his own . MW3 , Shri B.R. Jain has also admitted that page 34 of the WWl / 1 at point H bear signature . MW 4has also admitted that he has not seen any record per- taining to contract awarded by the management for the period as mentioned in Para II of his affidavit . MW 4 has also stated that he has not seen any security contract from June, 1999 to June , 2000. Some of the management wit- nesses have admittd their signatures on the photocopies filed by the workman . There are so many Officers so it is not possible to get the signature of everyone verified . If the signature on one or two documents are admitted and the documents are of the same nature they have force of original documents . The management will always avoid to file the original documents. The witnesses have admitted that they have put their signatures on page 34 and 37. All the documents filed by the workman contain the same matter . The workman has filed such documents from P - 11 to P-87. All these documents are similar in nature and con- tain the same particulars and have been signed by the different Officers . The signatures on 34 and 37 have been admitted by two witnesses .

These documents are maintained for the same pur- pose of Jumper Shifting . The workman has also put his signature. In the circumstances an adverse inference is drawnthat the workman has done the work of Jumper Shift- ing at least in the year 2001 and 2002. All these photo- copies appear to be signed by the JTO, SDO & SDE . There appears.no merit in the contention of the management that such documents are not maintained in the management. If one or two documents are admitted , an adverse inference canbe drawn regarding the other documents .

The photocopies from 11 to 87 are admissible in evidence as they have been maintained for the same job and all the photocopies have been signed by the JTO or SDO or SDE . At least two such photocopies have been admitted by the management witness . The management witnesses have also admitted that there was no contract record. So the case of the management that the workman was a contractor man terms out to be absolutely false . The workman has at least discharged 240 days duties in the year 2001 and 2002 .

It was submitted by the management that BSNLdid not exist in the year 1992. It may not be in existence at that time but the same department was in existence in the year 2001 and 2002 .

In ID cases strict and sophisticated Rules of evidence Act are not applicable . The workman can file only photocopies , the originals are always in the possession of the management. The management invariably denies the originals being in their possession . In such circumstances 9988

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] photocopies are sometimes relied upon if they have nexus with the original documents . If photocopies are on the letter head of the management and they bear seal and sig- nature of the management an adverse inference can be drawn regarding their having the force of the originals .

Incase a workman has worked for 240 days in a year and the work is of continuous and regular nature he should be paid retrenchment compensation . In case retrenchment compensation is not paid section 25 F of the ID Act is attracted . There is no cessation of his services . He is deemed continued in service in the eye of law. In case there is breach of section 25 F the service is continued and reinstatement follows as a natural consequence .

I D Act , 1947 has been enacted to safeguard the interest of the workmen belonging to poor segment of so- ciety . It appears that Legislature wanted that such work- men should not be harassed unnecessarily so Sections 25 F , U , T and Clause 10 of V Schedule have been enacted .

Inthe instant case the photocopies filed by the man- agement have a close nexus to the original documents . The management has deliberately concealed the originals . The case of the workman is that he has been working since July, 1991 and his services were terminated on 4-10-2002 . The workman has not filed documents relatingto his du- ties of his entire tenure . It is not possible for a workman to keep the photocopies of every work performed by him .

The case of the management is that the workman has worked through some contractors . No documents regard- ing contract have been filed . I have carefully perused the documents filed on the record . It becomes quite obvious that the workman has worked for more than 240 days at least in the year 2001 and in the year 2002.

This issue is dedcided accordingly.

ISSUE NO.2

The objects and reasons of ID Act , 1947 show that the respondent management should not be permitted to indulge in any unfair labour practice . The workmen should not be engaged for years and then they should be removed all of a sudden . There is provision of retrenchment com- pensation for his removal . Retrenchment compensation is for compensating him otherwise so that he can survive long interregnum of unemployment. In the instant case no retrenchment compensation has been paid .

Itwas submitted from the side of the bank that rein- statement is not the only relief in all the cases of illegal termination. Section 11 A of the ID Act, 1947 provides for payment of compensation also . It was submitted from the side of the workman that compensation is payable in cases where an undertaking has become sick or it has been closed or it is in economic loss . It has not been established that the management is in economic loss and it is a sick Indus- try.

It was submitted from the side of the management thatthe Hon'ble Apex Court in 2006 (4) Scale has put down a complete ban on regularization and reinstatement . The Hon'ble Apex Court has held that employment can onlybe made on the basis of procedure established in that behalf envisaged by the Constitution . Equality of opportunity is the hallmark and the Constitution enshrines affirmative action to ensure that unequals are not treated equals . So public employment should be in terms of constitutional scheme.

Itwas further submitted that the Constitution Bench Judgment has afforded a right according to which the Gov- ernment is not precluded from making temporary appoint- ments or engaging workers on daily wages .

My attention was drawn by the Ld . Counsel of the workman to 2000 LLR 523 State of UP and Rajender Singh. The Hon'ble Apex Court ordered for reinstatement with full back wages as the services of the daily wager cleaner who worked for 4 years was dispensed with without fol- lowing the procedure for retrenchment . In the instant case also no retrenchment compensation has been paid. This case law squarely covers the instant case .

It has been held in 1978 Lab IC 1668 that in case service of a workman is terminated illegally the normal rule is to reinstate him with full back wages .

My attention was further drawn to AIR 2002 SC 1313 . TheHon'ble Supreme Court has held that daily wager even if serving for a short period should be reinstated .

The Hon'hle Apex Court has not declared the provi- sions of ID Act un- constitutional . The Government has got no license to make always appointment of daily wagers and to continue them for life time . Fixed term tenure ap- pointments and temporary appointments cannot be the rule of public employment . At the time of making tempo- rary appointments Articles 14 & 16 are infringed . There is no constitutional mandate that the Government is at lib- erty to go on giving fixed term appointments for the entire tenure of service of an employee .

Inthe instant case Sections 25 F, G of the ID Act are attracted. In section 25 of the ID Act it has been provided that if a workman has performed 240 days work and if the work is of continuous and regular nature he should be given pay in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensa- tion.

It has been held by the Hon'ble Apex Court that there is no cessation of service in case provisions of section 25 F are not complied . In the instant case no compensation has been paid to the workman .

their favourites and thus the principles of equality en- shrined in the Constitution will be given a go bye . Such is not the intent of the Hon'ble Apex Court . However , in this judgment the provisions of the ID Act governing the ser- vices of the workman have not been declared un-constitu- tional. Reinstatement is the remedy provided in the ID Act for breach of several provisions enumerated therein or for breach of service rules provided in various labour welfare legislations.

Section 11 A of the ID Act stipulates that in case the Tribunal is satisfied that the order of discharge or dis- missal was not justified , it may, by its award, set aside the order of discharge or dismissal and direct reinstatement of the workman on such terms and conditions , if any, as it thinks fit or give such other relief to the workman including the award of any lesser punishment in lieu of discharge or dismissal as the circumstance of the case may require . According to this benign provision, this Tribunal has the authority to set aside the order of discharge or dismissal and reinstate the workman on the terms and conditions as itthinks fit.

The Hon'hle Apex Court in 2006 (4) Scale has not annulled section 25 F of the ID Act. The judgment citedby the management is not applicable in the facts and circum- stances of the case .

Athree Judges Bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court has held in 1993 - II - LLJ that termination of services af- fects the livelihood of not only of the employee but also of the dependents . So in case of illegal termination of service the workman should be reinstated .

Reinstatement should not be misconceived as regu- larization. By the order of reinstatement the status quo arite of the workman is restored . He is given back wages in order to compensate him for his illegal dis -engagement . This is a special remedy provided in ID Act and it has not been annulled and set aside by any judginent of the Hon'ble Apex Court. The provisions of the ID Act are still constitutional and they are to be given effect too .

It is settled law that in case a workman has com- pleted240 days in any calendar year or 12 calendar months he is entitled to retrenchment compensation of 15 days for every completed year and one month's pay in lieu of no- tice. The management has not complied with the postu- lates of Section 25 F of the ID Act, 1947. The workman has been retrenched in violation of Section 25 F of the ID Act , 1947.

It has been held in a catena of cases by the Hon'ble Apex Court that in case retrenchment compensation is not paid there is no cessation of the services of the workman and the services of the workman will be continued in the eye of law. Termination of service of the workman in the instant case has not been effected according to the provi- sions of Section 25 F of the ID Act, 1947, so his services are deemed to be continued in view of Section 25 F of the ID Act , 1947.

9989

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

It is not the case of the management that the work does not exist. In case the work is continued the workman should be reinstated . The work of shifting Jumper still exists with the management .

It is ofcourse true that the workman has not filed documents relating to discharge of his duties from July, 1991. No workman is expected to have documents so old . The workman has specifically mentiond the names under whom he worked. The Officers under whom the workman worked are the Officers of the management . He has named each and every name of the Officer , so the workman has performed 10-12 years service under the management . It is not the case of the management that some other persons have been selected at his place through regular process of selection . It is not the case of the management that some other employee did the job of shifting jumpher . No such name has been disclosed. There is vague statement that he was contractor's employee . No document of contract has been filed. Thus, it is found proved that the workman did the job of Jumper shifting from 1991 till termination of his services . The workman has wasted much of his youth in the services of the management . He has been illegally thrown out without considering his long service rendered to the management.

In case the workman is reinstated with back wages the respondents have every right , after payment of back wages and reinstatement, to retrench him validly following the principles of first come last go so that Sections 25, G & H of the ID Act are not violated .

Inview ofthe law cited above and the facts pertain- ing in this case , the workman is entitled to reinstatement .

This issue is decided accordingly.

ISSUE NO.3.

Itwas submitted by the management that payment of full back wages is not the natural consequence of the order ofdischarge or dismissal being set aside . It has been held in (2003 ) 6 SCC 141 that it is incumbent upon the labour court to decide the quantum of back wages .

It has been further held in this case that payment of back wages having discretionary element involved it isto be dealt with the facts and circumstances of the case . No definite formula can be evolved .

It has been further held in this case that payment of backwages in its entirety is the statutory sanction . In (2003 ) 4 SCC 27 the Hon'ble Apex Court held that in view of delay in raising the dispute and initiating the proceedings back wags need not be allowed . In the instant case there is no delay at least on the part of the workman in raising the dispute.

In 1978 Lab IC 1968 three Judges Bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court held that payment of full back wages is the normal rule . In case services have been illegally ter- minated either by dismissal or discharge or retrenchment, in such circumstance the workman is entitled to full back 9990

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

wages exceptto the extent he was gainfully employed dur- ing the enforced idleness . In the instant case the workman was always ready to work but he was not permitted on account of invalid act of the employer.

In 2005 IV AD SC 39 three Judges Bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court held that reinstatement with full back wages is justified. In this case the workman has performed more than 240 days work and he has been retrenched with- out payment of compensation and pay in lieu of notice .

It was submitted from the side of the management that reinstatement is not the only remedy . In such cases the workman may be given compensation . Section 11 A of the ID Act , 1947 provides that in case of dismissal or dis- charge is found illegal reinstatement should be ordered . It has been held in a catena of cases by the Hon'ble Apex Court that reinstatement with full back wages is the normal rule .'The statute provides for reinstatement . In certain ex- ceptional cases where the undertaking has been closed down or it has become sick there inay be order for payment of compensation.

The workman has been doing jumper for 11-12 years . He is out of employment . His age for employment may have passed . He is a manual worker as no certificate re- garding his technical qualification has been filed . He might be doing some sort ofjob off and on. He is not employed in any establishment . In the facts and circumstances of the case the workman is entitled to 25% back wages.

This issue is decided accordingly.

ISSUE NO . 4.

From the issue nos . 1 , 2 and 3 decided above the workman applicant is entitled to reinstatement along with 25% backwages .

The reference is replied thus:-

The termination of service of Shri Sapnesh Kumar S/ o Shri Nafe Singh , Wireman w.e.f. 4-10-2002 by the man- agement to BSNL , Jind is neither just nor legal . The man- agement should reinstate the workman applicant w.e.f. 4-10-2002 along with 25 % back wages within two months from the date of the publication of the award .

The award is given accordingly .

Date: 23-11-2007 .

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3579. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 17/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -40012/206/2003- आई आर (डीयू) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डैस्क अधिकारी

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] New Delhi , the 29th November , 2007 S.O. 3579. In pursuance of Section17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 17/2004) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court No. 2 , New Delhi , as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the managcinent of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2007.

[No.L-40012/206/2003 - IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT, NEW DELHI PRESIDING OFFICER: R.N.RAI . I.D. No. 17/2004 IN THE MATTER OF :

Shri Anil Kumar, S/o Sh Daya Kishan , Vill : BishanPuri , Distt: Jind , Haryana

Versus

The General Manager , BSNI ., Jind , Haryana .

AWARD

The Ministry of Lahour by its letter No. L - 40012/206/2003- IR(DU) Central Government Dt. 19-1-2004 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder :

"Whether the termination of service of Sh . Anil Kumar , S/ o Daya Kishan , Driver w.e.f..22-7-2001 by the management of BSNL , Jind is just and legal ? If notto what relief the workman is entitled, "

The workman applicant has filed claim statement . In the claim statement it has been stated that the workman joined BSNL as a casual labour as ' Driver ' on 7-11-1998 on monthly salary of Rs . 1,400 and worked with the District Manager , Telecommunication , BSNL, Jind.

Thatthe workman was driving Vehicle No. 495, 1934 & 396 belonging to the management of BSNL , Jind. It is respectfully submitted that the workman was also madeto de ether miscellaneous work like taking vehicles to garage for repair etc. servicing photocopies of work performance registers , logbook, oil/petrol issued slips , repair receipts of Vehicle No. HR -31A - 7465 , Jind and HR31A -3347 , Narwana are annexed and marked as Annexure WW1 / 1 (Colly) .

that the workman has performed his duties sincerely and with utmost dedication and honestly for a continuous period of more than 3 years and there was no complaint against him from any corner .

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

That it is a matter of great astonishment that inspite of the constant and ordinate service of the workman , the management terminated the services of the workman on 22-7-2001 without any rhyme and reason..

It is submitted that the said termination order was verbal as no written order was given to the workman by the management.

That the said termination of the service of the work- man is illegal, unlawful , unjustified , arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice.

That the workman served a demand notice dated 24-01-2002 on the management for reinstatement but the management opted to remain silent. A copy of the demand notice is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure WW- 1/2 .

That thereafter, an industrial disputes was raised before the Conciliation Officer . However , on account of an adamant attitude of the management, the conciliation pro- ceedings failed resulting into this reference . Copy of the and conciliation report is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure WW 1/3 .

That the workman is covered under the definition of workman as defined under section 2 (s) of the ID Act , 1947. It is submitted that their exists an employee -eraployer rela- tionship between the workman and the management . That the workman was working under the direct control and supervision of the management .

That the workman has completed more than 240days in each of the calendar year without any kind of break.

That the workman was neither issued charge sheet nor a show cause notice was given before his illegal termi- nation. It is submitted that even no inquiry was held against the workman before terminating his services .

That the said termination of the services of the work- man amount to retrenchment and the management has not followed the mandatory provisions of the ID Act, 1947.

That the management has not completed with the mandatory provisions as mentioned under Section 25F of the Act as neither one month's notice was given or wages in lieu of no notice or retrenchment compensation was given to the workman .

That the management has also violated the provi- sions of section 25G of the ID Act, 1947 by employing and regularizing the services of the persons who were juniors to the workman .

That the workman was working against a regular and permanent post . That the work is of perennial nature. It is submitted that the job on which the workman was working, still exists and even the fresh appointment has been made against the said post .

4.935 GI /07-25

9991

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

That the workman was not paid equal pay as com- pared to the permanent employees though the workman was doing the same kind of work as done by the permanent employees . It is submitted that the workman used to receive his salary from the concerned officials under whom the workman used to work . That the action of the management violative of Article 14 & 16 of the Constitu- tionof India.

That the workman used to mark his attendance in a register on regular basis , which is with the management .

That the workman has orally and verbally demanded forthe appointment letter time and again from the manage- ment but the demand was not been accepted by the management .

TheManagement has filed written statement. In the written statement it has been stated that the present reference is without application of mind in as much as the appropriate government without appreciating the fact that Shri Anil Kumar was appointed by the Answering Management for a limited period and had not completed even240 days of service in a calendar year as such while referring the dispute the appropriate government has erred in coming to conclusion that there has been termination of services of Shri Anil Kumar . It is submitted that the appropriate government without appreciating the said fact has hade present reference for adjudication which has resulted in grave miscarriage of justice and the said reference is liable to be answered in negative .

That Shri Anil Kumar was engaged on a contract basis for driving vehicle for a period from 12-3-1999 to 30-5-1999 and 7-6-1999 to 17-6-1999 i e . for a approximate period of 100 days and again form 5-4-2000 to 23-9-2000 i.e. for a period of approximately 170 days . It is submitted that Shri Anil Kumar was engaged on contract basis and that too keeping in view the exigencies of business of the Answering Management . Admittedly Shri Anil Kumar has not completed 240 days during any calendar year or a financial year as such Shri Anil Kumar has no claim what- soever against the Answering Management It is further submitted that Shri Anil Kumar was admittedly employed ondaily wages and his contract came to end on the expiry ofeach working day as such Shri Anil Kumar can have no claim against the Answering Management and the present claim is misconceived and is liable to be dismissed.

That the appropriate government while referring the said disputes for adjudication before this Hon'ble Tribu- nal failed to appreciate that the Conciliation Officer has categorically observed that the Answering Management had produced the log book of four vehicles , payment vouchers in original as well as oil receipts issued by Petrol Pumps and repair carried out at the hands of workshop through Shri Anil Kumar. The said documents were duly scrutinized and each and every paper was duly examined in minute details and was satisfied that Shri Anil Kumar had never worked for 240 days during a calendar year 9992

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

admittedly Shri Anil Kumar failed to produce any docu- ment to counter the statements made by the Answering Management and furthermore admittedly all wages for the period Shri Anil Kumar worked with the Answering Management had been cleared and nothing was outstand- ing. Shri Anil Kumar failed to produce any evidence to show that he had worked more than 240 days in a calendar year or from a period contrary to what has been stated by the Answering Management before the Conciliation Of- ficer . By not appreciating the said facts and the appropri- ate government still referring the alleged dispute for adju- dication the said facts and the appropriate government still referring the alleged dispute for adjudication and fram- ing terms of reference without even appreciating the said facts have resulted in grave miscarriage of justice and the said reference is liable to be rejected on this sole ground.

That the present reference liable to be dismissed , Shri Anil Kumar was never employed by General Man- ager , BSNL , as such also the present claim is liable to be rejected.

That Shri Anil Kumar last worked with the Answer- ingManagement till 23-9-2000 and the present claim was raised only in the year 2002 as such the raising of the present claim is also bad for delay and latches and is liable to be rejected on this sole ground.

The appropriate Government having referred the dis- pute to this Hon'ble Tribunal is a matter of record . How- ever , it is submitted that the said reference has been made without application of mind in as much as Shri Anil Kumar had not completed 240 days in any calendar year and ad- mittedly Shri Anil Kumar was employed on a daily wages on temporary basis for a limited period keeping in view the exigencies of the business the appropriate Government without appreciating the said facts has erred in referring the matter and coming to conclusion that as to whether the termination of the service is just and legal , if not, what relief Shri Anil Kumar is entitled .

It is specifically denied that Shri Anil Kumar joined BSNL as a casual labourer as a car driver on 7-11-98 on monthly salary of Rs . 11,00 . It is specifically denied that Shri Anil Kumar joined on 7-11-1998 . It is submitted that Shri Anil Kumar joined only on 12-3-1999 and worked till 30-5-1999 and again from 7-6-1999 to 17.6.1999 for 100 days and again from5-4-2000 to 23-9-2000 for 172 days . Shri Anil Kumar has not completed 240 days during an year starting from any date .

Shri Anil Kumar was driving various vehicle of the Answering Management . It is specifically denied that Shri AnilKumar was driving vehicle Nos . 495, 1934 and 396 as alleged in para under reply . It is submitted that from the perusal of the said numbers. It is clear that there can be no such vehicles with such numbers the said statements have been made with malafide intentions and ulterior motives . It isspecifically denied that Shri Anil Kumar was also made to do other miscellaneous works . It is submitted that

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] when Shri Anil Kumar was employed he was required to do work relating to the said vehicles which included repairs , services of the said vehicles etc. It is further submitted that from the said alleged documents it is clear that some of the documents are forged and can not be relied upon and Shri Anil Kumar is put to strict proof thereof. No reliance whatsoever can be placed on the said documents.

It is specifically denied that Shri Anil Kumar per- formed his duties sincerely and with utmost dedications and continuously for a period of more than 3 years as alleged . It is submitted that Shri Anil Kumar worked only for a limited period as set out herein above .

It is submitted that Shri Anil Kumar worked for limited period as set out herein above . It is specifically denied that the services of Shri Anil Kumar were termi- nated on 22-7-01 as alleged or otherwise .

Itissubmitted that Shri Anil Kumar last worked with the Answering Management on 23-9-2000 and as such there was no question of termination of the services thereafter as alleged or otherwise .

It is specifically denied that termination of the services of Shri Anil Kumar are illegal , unjustified, arbitrary and against the principle of natural justice .

It is submitted that the Answering Management craves a reference to the report of the said Conciliation Officer which clearly shows that Shri Anil Kumar never worked for 240 days in a calendar year and Shri Anil Kumar failed to produce any evidence to establish the said facts .

It is submitted that Shri Anil Kumar is not covered under the definition of workman as defined under the Industrial Disputes Act . It is specifically denied that there exist an employee -employer relationship between Shri Anil Kumar and the Answering Management . It is correct that Shri Anil Kumar worked with the Answering Management during the period when Shri Anil Kumar was employedby the Answering Management .

It isspecifically denied that Shri Anil Kumar com- pleted more than 240 days in each of the calendar year without any kind of break and Shri Anil Kumar is put to proof thereof. Answering Management craves a reference to what is stated herein in reply to para under reply.

It is submitted that since Shri Anil Kumar had worked for a limited period there was no question of terminating his services and issuance of any charge sheet or the no- tice or holding enquiries as alleged in para under reply .

It is submitted that Section 25 (G) of the Industrial Disputes Act has no applicability in the present case as Shri Anil Kumar is not working and is not covered under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act .

It is specifically denied that the Answering Man- agement has violated the provisions of Section 25 (G) of the Industrial Disputes Act. It is specifically denied that the Answering Management has employed and regular- 9993 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II--खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ] .

izes the services of the persons who were juniors to Shri Anil Kumar and Shri Anil Kumar is put to strict proof thereof.

It isspecifically denied that Shri Anil Kumar was working against regular and permanent job and the work was of a perennial nature . It is specifically denied that the job which Shri Anil Kumar was doing in the year 2000 still exist and that even fresh appointment has been made.

The workman has further filed paper No.B - 48 to B - 68photocopies of repair of certain vehicles. These photo- copies also do not bear the name of the workman . He has puthis signature on the back of these photocopies . These photocopies also at best may be proof of his 20 days work- ing. The workman has filed photocopies of attendance sheets which are on blank papers from paper No. 69 to 92. These photocopies are not on the letter head of the man- agement; however , there is seal of the management . The workman has put his signature on approximately 170-180 days .

Evidence of both the parties has been taken.

In ID cases the management always takes the plea that the originals are not available . The workman can be best in the possession of the photocopies , so photo copies in the special circumstances may be relied upon .

Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.

These photocopies disclose that the workman has worked fromApril to September , 2000. If these photocopies are relied upon the workman has worked for 170-180 days in 2000 from April to September . The workman has not annexed with the record any other documents regarding his employment with the management .

It was submitted from the side of the workman that he joined the BSNL as a casual Driver on 17-11-1998 on monthly salary of Rs.1400 and worked with the District Mariager , Telecommunications , BSNL, Jind. He was driv- ing Vehicle No.495 , 314 and 396 belonging to the manage- ment of BSNL , Jind . He was also made to do other miscel- laneous work like taking vehicle to garage for repair , ser- vicing , photocopies of work performance register , Log Book, Oil/Petrol issue slips, repairs receipts of Vehicle No.HR 31 A7495 , BSNL, Jind .

The management has admitted in the written state- ment that the workman has worked for 100 days approxi- mately from March, 1999 to June , 1999 and 170 days from 5thApril, 2000 to 23-09-2000 . In case photocop docu- ments are relied upon the workman has worked for 100 days in 1999 and 170 days from April , 2000 to September , 2000. So the workman has not completed 240 days in 12 caiendar months , even in case the photocopies filed by him are taken to be true .

It was further submitted that the management ille- gally terminated the services of the workman on 22-07-2001 without any rhyme and reason verbally. It is illegal , unlawful, unjustified , arbitrary and against the prin- ciples of natural justice .

It is settled law that the workman has to prove 240 daysworking within 12 calendar months . The workman was engaged up to June , 1999 for 100 days, and from April to September , 2000 for 170 days .

Itwas further submitted that the management vio- lated the provisions of Section 25F and G of the ID Act, 1947. The work still exists and even fresh appointment has been made against the said post . He used to receive his salary from the concerned officer under whom he used to work.

Itwas submitted from the side of the management that the workman was engaged on contract basis for driv- ing vehicle for the period from 12-03-1999 to 30-05-1999 and 07-06-1999 to 17-06-1999 for 100 days and in 2000 ap- proximately for 1.70 days .

He was engaged on contract basis keeping in view the exigencies of business of the management. He has not completed 240 days work during any calendar year or any financial year as such the workman has no claim whatso- ever against the management .

The management has admitted that the workman has worked for 172 days from 05-04-2000 to 23-09-2000 . The workman has been engaged twice , once in 1999 for 100 days and after a gap of 9 months he has been again en- gaged in 2000 for 172 days , so the workman has not com- pleted 240 days either in the year 1999 or in the year 2000 . Hewas previously engaged up to 17-06-1999 and again he was given engagement on 05-04-2000 after a lapse of al- most 9 months , so it cannot be said that he worked con- tinuously for 240 days during the 12 calendar months . There was gap of 6 months in his two engagements, so the work- man has not worked for 240 days either in a calendar year or in 12 calendar months preceding his termination. Provi- sions of Section 25 F of the ID Act , 1947 are not attracted .

The case of the management that the workman was engaged on contract basis for specific periods is correct . The workman has not proved even by photocopies docu- ments 240 days work

In ID cases strict and sophisticated Rules of Evi- dence Act are not applicable . The workman can file only.

The workman has annexed photocopies of credit coupon, B 13 to B 47. The credit coupons bear the signature of the authorities and Sh. Anil Kumar has put his signature overleaf. These credit coupon are for 35 to 40 days and even photocopies cannot be said to be proof of working of the workman as his name does not appear on the front page. He has put his signature on the back of these cradir coupons .

9994

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1, 1929

photocopies, the originals are always in the possession of the management . The management invariably denies the originals being in their possession . In such circumstances photocopies are sometimes relied upon if they have nexus with the original documents . If the photocopies are on the letter head of the management and they bear seal and sig- nature of the management an adverse inference regarding their having the force of original can be drawn .

The workman has worked for 100 days in the year 1999 and after a gap of six months he has worked for 170 days in the year 2000. These working days are admittedby the management . The management has stated that he was engaged on contract basis in view of the exigencies and increase of work . The workman has not worked for 240 Jays either in 1999 or in 2000. He has not worked for 240 days even during 12 calendar months preceding the date of his discharge. He is not entitled to get any relief.

The reference is replied thus:

The termination of service of Sh . Anil Kumar S / o .

Daya Kishan , Driver w.e.f. 22.07.2001 by the management ofBSNL , Jind is just and legal . The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for .

The award is given accordingly.

Date: 26-11-2007 .

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3580.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. II, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 16/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-40012/207/2003- आई आर ( डीयू) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 29th November , 2007 S.O. 3580.-in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref . No. 16/2004) Central Goveransent industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , No. 11 NewDelhi , as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2007.

[No. L - 40012/207/2003 - IR (DU ) ]

SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENTINDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, NEW DELHI

PRESIDIG OFFICER: R. N. RAL.

. D. No. 16/2004

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] IN THE MATTER OF :

Shri Karamveer,

S/ o Shri Soran Ram, Bhiwani Road, Ajmer Basti , H. No. 543 , Ward No. 30,

Jind(Haryana)

VERSUS

The General Manager ,

BSNL, Jind ,

Distt . Bhiwani ,

Bhiwani (Haryana)

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L 40012/207/ 2003 - IR(DU) CENTRAL GOVERNMENT DT. 19-01-2004 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder:

"Whether the termination of service of Shri Karamveer S / o Shri Saran Ram Sweeper , w.e.f. 12/7/2002 by the management to BSNL, Jind is just and legal ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled . "

That the workman was appointed as a casual worker as a " sweeper " with District Manager , Telecommunications, BSNL, Jind during the year, 1992.

That the workman has worked under the supervision ofMr. H.S. Pawar in the year 1995 and Mr. M.K. Singh in the year, 1998.

That the workman used to Sign in the Stock Register along with the permanent employees of BSNL , Jind for receiving materials like broom , duster , soap , phenyl etc. for doing the sweeping/ cleaning work . The photocopies of the Stock Register are annexed and marked as WW1/ 1 (Colly).

That the workman has performed and discharged his duties sincerely with utmost dedication and honesty for a continuous period of 10 years . That there has been no complaint against him from any corner . That the experience of over 10 years is indicative of the fact that the services of the workman are definitely required on day to day basis and the work performed by the workman is of perennial nature .

Thatit is the matter of great astonishment that inspite of the constant and ordinate services of the workman , the services of the workman was terminated on 12-7-2002 by the management .

That the said termination of services of the workman on 1.2-7-2002 was without any rhyme and reason and against the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It is pertinent to mention that the said termination was verbal as no written termination order was given by the management .

That the said termination of the services of the workman is entirely illegal , unlawful , unjustified , arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice .

9995 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

That the workman served a demand notice dated 30-9-2002 on the management for reinstatement but the management opted to remain silent . Copy annexed and marked as WW 1/2 .

That the workman has orally and verbally demanded for the appointment letter time and again from the management but the demand was not accepted by the management .

That the workman has participated in the sports day of the management and has earned many prizes . The copy of the photographs of the workman receiving prices and annexed and marked as WW1/4 .

That thereafter an industrial dispute was raised before Conciliation Officer . However , on account of an adamant attitude of the rnanagement, the conciliation proceedings failed resulting into this Reference . The copy of the Conciliation Report is annexed and marked as WW 1/3 .

That the workman is squarely covered under the definition of workman as defined U/s . 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. That there exists an employer- employees relationship between the workman and the management . The workman used to work under the direct supervision and control of the management . That the work done by the workman was assigned by the management . That the workman used to work within the prernises of the managernent .

That the workman has completed more than 240days in each of the calendar year , without any kind of break .

The Management has filed written statement . In the written statement it has been stated that the present reference is without application of mind as much as the appropriate Government without appreciating the fact that Shri Karamveer was never appointed by the Answering Management as such still referring the dispute has erred in coming to the conclusion that the Answering Management has terminated the service of Shri Karamveer . It is submitted that the appropriate Government erred in referring the dispute for adjudication without appreciating the said fact as such the present reference "Whether the termination of services of Shri Karamveer by the Management of BSNL, Jind is just and legal" is liable to be answered in negative .

That the workman was neither issued a chargesheet nor a show cause notice before the illegal termination . It is pertinent to mention that even no enquiry was held against the workman before terminating the services of the workman.

That Shri Karamveer was never employed by the Answering Management at any stage whatsoever . It is submitted that the sister of Shri Karamveer namely Smt . Rukmani Devi has been working as Sweeper ( now RM ) in the old telephone exchange building Jind . It is submitted that since 1985 new recruitment has been banned in the department during the period when Shri Karamveer is claiming to have worked as a sweeper .

That the said termination of the services of the workman amounts to " retrenchment " and the management has not followed any mandatory provisions of the I. D. Act, 1947 .

It is submitted that there has neither been any vacancy for the post of Sweeper nor there has been any decision on behalf of the BSNL to appoint the Sweeper as such the present statement of claim is misconceived and without any basis .

That the management has not complied with the mandatory provisions as mentioned under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as neither one month's notice was given or wages in lieu if the notice nor retrenchment compensation was given to the workman .

That the management has also violated the provisions ofS. 25 of the I. D. Act by employing and regularizing the services of the person junior to the workman namely Ashok Kumar.

It is submitted that since Shri Karamveer is the brother of Smt . Rukmani Devi , the regular Sweeper in the Department, he used to help his sister in her interest now and then . It is submitted that as per the office records some signatures of Shri , Karamveer are available in the stock register (which is a mistake on behalf of the person for handing over/taking over the goods) for the items issued to his sister Smt . Rukmani Devi .

That the workman was working against a regular and permanent post . That the work is of perennial rature . It is respectfully submitted that job on which the workman was working still exists and even fresh appointment has been made against the said post .

It issubmitted that Shri Karamveer was given the work of washing of office Towels , Bed Sheets , Car seats , covers etc. and payment for which was duly made to Shri Karamveer for his work . Shri Karamveer was never employed by the Answering Management as such there was no question of terminating his services as alleged or otherwise as such also making of the reference to this Tribunal has resulted in grave miscarriage of justice.

That the workman was not paid equal wages / pay as comparedto the permanent employees though the workman was doing the same kind of work as done by the permanent employees . It is respectfully submitted that the workman used to receive his salary from the concerned officers under whom the workınan used to work . That the action of the management is violative of Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India .

That the workman used to mark his attendance in a register on a regular basis which is with the management .

That Shri Karamveer has not come with clean hands in as much as Shri Karamveer is trying to take advantage of some signatures alleged to have been put him during the course of helping his. sister Smt. Rukmani Devi for 9996

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] carrying out the work assigned to her . It is submitted that Shri Karamveer cannot be permitted to take benefits of his alleged illegal and wrongful actions . Shri Karamveer was never employed by the Answering Management and as such the statements made in the Statement of clairn are false and misleading and have been with malafide intentions and ulterior motives with the sole purpose of making illegal and unlawful gains at the cost of the Answering Management as such also the present reference is liableto be answered in negative.

when Shri Karamveer got some items issued for and on behalf of his sister Smt . Rukmani Devi and at the time of getting iterns issued,to his sister Smt. Rukmani Devi and at the time of getting items issued , his signatures were obtained in the stock register. It is submitted that the said act of the concerned person in BSNL was wrong and not as per the rules and regulations. In any case Shri Karamveer was never employed by the Answering Management and he was visiting the office of the Answering Management to assist his sister Smt . Rukmani Devi on and off and during the said visits if he had got some items issued, the same is of no help to Shri Karamveer as he was never employed by the Answering Management and there is no relationship of"Employer and Employee " between Shri Karamveer and the Answering Management . The photocopy of the stock register annexed is matter of record.

That the statement made in the statement of claim are vague and Shri Karamveer has failed to show as to for which period he was employed as alleged in the statement of claim. It is submitted that Shri Karamveer was never employed eve for a single day in any çalendar year and was carrying out some work for and on behalf of his sister Smt . Rurkmani Devi on various occasions as such the claim ofShri Karamveer is misconceived and the same is liable to be dismissed ..

It is submitted that Shri Karamveer was never employed by the Answering Management as such there is no question of his discharging his duties sincerely with dedications and honestly for even a single day what to talk of Ten years . It is submitted that the statements made in para under reply are false and mischievous and have been made with malafide intentions and ulterior motives .

It is submitted that Shri Karamveer was never employed by the Answering Management as such there is no question of his services being terminated as alleged or otherwise.

That there has been complete non - application of mind by the appropriate Government while referring the said dispute for adjudication as there was no relationship of " Employee and Employer " between the Answering Management and Shri Karamveer as Shri Karamveer was never employed by the Answering Management . Without appreciating the said fact and referring the dispute for adjudication has resulted in grave miscarriage of justice and the said reference is liable to be rejected on this sole ground.

Itissubmitted that the said reference has been made without application of mind as much as Shri Karamveer was never employed by the Answering Management às such there is no question of termination of his services and the present reference is liable to be answered in negative .

It is specifically denied that the Answering Management ever terminated the services of Shri Karamveer on 12-7-2002 or any other day as alleged or otherwise . The statements made in para under reply are false , mischievous and have been made with malafide intentions and ulterior motives as Shri Karamveer was never employed by the Answering Managernent therefore , there is no question of terminating his service .

The Answering Management carves a reference to whatis stated hereinabove in reply to Para under reply . It is submitted as Shri Karamveer was never employed by the Answering Management as such there is no question of termination of his services as alleged or otherwise .

It is specifically denied that Shri Karamveer was appointed as a casual worker as a " Sweeper " with District Manager Telecommunication , BSNL, Jind in the year 1992 as alleged or otherwise . It is submitted that in the year 1992, BSNL was not in existence as such it is clear that Shri Karamveer has filed the present statement of claim without applying his mind .

It issubmitted that issuance of the alleged demand notice is without any basis whatsoever as Shri Karamveer was never employed by the Answering Management as such there is no question of his services being terminated and thereafter he being reinstated . Since the notice itself was misconceived and without any basis thereafter , there was no reason to replying for the same .

It is specifically denied that Shri Karamveer has worked under the supervision of Mr. H.S. Pawar in the year 1995 and Mr. M.K. Singh in the year 1998. It is submitted that the said statements are vague and without any basis . Shri Karamveer has failed to disclose for what period he had worked under so - called Mr. H.S. Pawar and Mr. M.Κ. Singh . It is submitted that Shri Karamveer was never employed and had never worked either with the District Manager , Telecommunication BSNL or Shri Pawar or Shri M.K. Singh at any stage .

It isspecifically submitted that Shri Karamveer used to visit the office of the Answering Management to help his sister Smt . Rukmani Devi and there have been occasions

It isspecifically denied that Shri Karamveer is covered under the definition of Workman as defined under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act . Since Shri Karamveer was never employed by the Answering Management . It is specifically denied that Shri Karamveer used to work in the direct supervision and control of the Management and he used to do the work , which was assigned , to him within the [भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

premises ofthe Management . The said statements are false, misleading and mischievous and have been made with malafide intentions and ulterior motives. It is submitted that the Answering Management failed to understand that when Shri Karamveer was never employed by the Answering Management as such on what basis Shri Kararnveer is claiming to have completed 240 days in each calendar without any break or otherwise .

It is submitted that since Shri Karmaveer was never employed by the Answering Management as such there was no question of issuing charge sheet or a show cause notice before or after the alleged termination. It is submitted that Karamveer was never employed by the Answering Management hence there was no question of holding enquires before the alleged termination.

Asalready stated herein above that Shri Karamveer was never employed by the Answering Management and hence his services was never terminated as such compliance/non- compliance of mandatory provisions as contained under Section 25 ( F) of the Industrial Disputes Act has no applicability whatsoever . The statements made are without any basis whatsoever .

Shri Karamveer was never employed by the Answering Management and his services were never terminated therefore , is no question of violating the provisions of Section 25 (G) of the Industrial Disputes Act . It is specifically denied that the person junior to Shri Karamveer namely Shri Ashok Kumar has been employed and regularized as alleged or otherwise . The statements rnade are false and misleading and have been made with rnalafide intentions and ulterior motives . Shri Ashok Kumar was appointed on part time basis and was later on regularized as per the orders receive form DOT/BSNL. It is specifically denied that Shri Karamveer ever worked with the Answering Management and that the work was of a perennial nature and the said job still exists and even fresh appointment have been made against the said post . The said statements are false and misleading and have been nade with malafide intentions and ulterior motives .

It issubmitted that since Shri Karamveer was never employed by the Answering Management and there was no question of paying any wages much less equal wages asalleged.

It isspecifically denied that Shri Karamveer used to mark his attendance in the register on a regular basis as alleged or otherwise . The statements made are false and misleading and the Answering Managernent craves a reference to what is stated hereinabove in reply to para under reply.

It is submitted that the alleged photographs has no relevancy in the present case . In any case admittedly Shri Karamveer is a brother of a regular employee of BSNL as such he may have participated in the sport day and earned prizes however , as already stated herein above the said

9997

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

winning or non - winning has no relevancy in the present case.

Evidence of both the parties has been taken .

Heard argumentfrom both the sides and perused the papers on the record .

The workman has put his signature on Stock Register , WW1 /1 (Colly) at Page 17, 19, 21, 23 and 27. WW 1/1 (Colly ) is photocopy of Stock Register , the workman has put his signature on five days . The workman has again filed photocopy of Stock Register , Page 28 to 51. His signatures appears on page 29, 30 , 32 and overleaf, 33 , 34, 38, 41, 42, 44 and overleaf, 45 and overleaf.

It becomes quite obvious from perusal of the photocopy, page no.30 that the workman has put his signature on 22-05-1999 . He has not put any signature on 17-07-1998 and 29.07.1998 . The signature of the workman appears on 06-09-1998 on page 32. He has not signed on this paper on the other dates . The signatures of the workma appears on overleas of page 32 on 8-7-1999 . He has put his signature on 07-09-1998 and 13-10-1999 on page 33.He has again put his signature on 12-07-1999 at page 38. He has put his signature on 22-05-1998 at page 42 and on 06-08-1999 at page 44 and overleaf of page 44. He has put his signature on page 45 on 03-08-1999 and overleaf. The workman has not annexed with the record any other document regarding his work .

The management has examined Sh . Sube Singh, MW1 and Sh . Jitender , MW2. These witnesses have deposed that the sister (Smt . Rukmani Devi) of the workman was working as sweeper in the old Telephone Exchange Building, Jind. Whenever she was ill and was on leave , the workman , the brother of Smt . Rukmani Devi was called . The BSNL was not in existence in Jind in the year 1992 .

The witness has identified his signature at one place on the photocopy . The management has not filed the originals. In the circumstances an adverse inference is drawn that the documents filed by the workman are photocopies ofthe originals of the management .

It was the duty of the workman to prove that he has worked continuously for 240 days in a calendar year or within 12 calendar months from the date of his retrenchment. The workman has filed photocopies of Stock Register from page 16 to 51. He has filed no other documents. From perusal of the photocopies , it appears that the workman has put his signature only on 18 days . There is no other documentary evidence regarding the working period of the workman. From the documents it is only established that he attended the duty only on 18 days and he was issued sweeping and cleaning materials .

9998

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/ PAUSA 1 , 1929

It may be argued that sweeping and cleaning materials are issued once in a month . The photocopies show that the materials have been issued twice or thrice a week and on different dates , in the same stock register . The premises are cleaned and washed everyday and cleaning and sweeping materials may be issued for 1 or 2 days only.

The management has categorically stated that Smt . Rukmani Devi , sister of the workman was working in the management . When she was absent/ill/ on leave , the workman i.e Sh . Karamveer , brother of Smt . Rukmani Devi resumed her work . Smt . Rukmani Devi has not put her signature on these photocopy documents . It suggests that whenever she was absent, ill or on leave , the workman resumed her work and he was issued washing and cleaning materials arid his signature was obtained on stock register .

The workman has worked at the place of his sister (Rukmani Devi) only for 18 days in the year 1997, 1998 and 1999. The workman has stated that he worked continuously for 10 years from 1995 onwards . There are no documents pertaining to the year 1995. He has filed copy of stock register of 1997, 1998 and 1999 and he has put his signature on 18 days only .

The workman applicant has filed affidavit which is self serving . The averments of claim statement cannot be proved on the basis of affidavit . The workman has not proved that he has worked either for 10 years or w.e.f. 1995 or for 240 days even in any of the years 1997, 1998 & 1999 . he has worked only for 18 days in the year 1997, 1998 & 1999 thus , the management's case he worked at the place of his sister whenever she was ill , absent or on leave appears to be correct .

Thus , the workman has miserably failed to prove his claim statement. He has not filed any documentary evidence pertaining to his work from 1995 onwards. He has put his signatures only on 18 days on the stock register that too at the place of his sister , Smt . Rukmani Devi . So the workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief.

The reference is replied thus:

The termination of services of Shri Karamvir S/o Shri Soran Ram, Sweeper w.e.f.12-7-2002 by the management of BSNL , Jind is just and legal . The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for .

The award is given accordingly.

Date: 28.11.2007

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3581.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एमटीएनएल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 58/2001) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं.. एल -40012/ 129/2001-आई आर (डीयू) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 29th November, 2007 S.O. 3581.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 58/2001) Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, No. II, New Delhi , as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of MTNL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2007.

[No. L-40012/ 129/2001 - IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT- IL, NEW DELHI PRESIDING OFFICER: R. N. RAL. I. D. No. 58/2001

In the Matter of: Shri Hira Bahadur , S/o . Shri Mehar Singh , Through Delhi Labour Union , Aggarwal Bhawan, G.T. Road , Tis Hazari , Delhi - 110054 . Versus

The Chief General Manager , MTNL Delhi Telephones, Khurshid Lal Bhawan , New Delhi .

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L40012/129/ 2001- IR(DU) Central Governemnt dt. 10-04-2001 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The point runs as hereunder :

"Whether Shri Hira Bahadur , Chowkidar- cum- Care Taker is a workman/employee of the MTNL ? If so , whether the action of the management of MTNL not regularizing the services of the said workman is just and legal ? Ifnot what relief the said workman is entitled to and from what date . "

Theworkman applicant has filed claim statement . In the claim statement it has been stated that the applicant is aworkman within the meaning of Section 2 (s) of the 1.D. Act , 1947 and has been in continuous service (as defined under Section 25 B of the said Act) under the management ofMTNI. , New Delhi which is an Industry within the meaning of Section 2 (j ) of the said Act .

[भाग II--खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

That the workman is presently working as Chowkidar- cum-Care Taker in the P & T Community Centre , P & T Colony , R.K. Puram, New Delhi - 110022 under the management.

That the workman was initially appointed as a Chowkidar-cum - Care Taker in the above P & T Community Centreduring the year 1976 as a whole time employee . The said community centre belonged to the erstwhile P & T Department and was placed under the control of the P & T Residents Welfare Association and Recreation Club , Section VI , R. K. Puram, New Delhi by the Department. The workman was paid a consolidated salary of Rs.175 per month through the said Welfare Association .

That the workman was paid the consolidated salary of Rs.175 per month for seven years without any revision . The amount of salary of the workman was however raised from Rs . 175 per month toRs.275 per month during the year 1983 under the orders issued by the General Manager , Delhi Telephones , New Delhi .

That the control of the said community centre was takenover by the General Manager, Delhi Telephones from the aforesaid P & T Residents Welfare Association , Sector VI , R.K. Puram, New Delhi in the year 1984 and thereafter the management of MTNL, New Delhi .

That the aforesaid community centre is being used for the following activities:

1.Arrangement ofMarriages ..

2. Holding of social functions / social gatherings .

3. Tailoring Classes for girls being run by the Mahila Door Sanchar from 11:00 to 14:00 hrs .

4. There is an office of the Residents Welfare Association functiong therein .

5.Holding of Departmental Examinations.

6. There is an MTNL Office functioning therein which attends to the Directory Enquiries of Directory Enquiry Phone - 197.

7. There is a library room also in the community centre for the residents of the P & T Colony.

The above activities are being are carried out in the said community under the instructions and specific sanction/ approval of the competent authority of the management and the appropriate charges as prescribed are being collected and credited to the account of the management after its control was taken over by the management of MTNL.

That the workman was paid very meager salary without payment of any perioidical increments . The amount ofsalary being paid to the workman was even less than the minimum wages fixed by the appropriate Government or casual labours/daily rate Mazdoors . The workman submitted various representations to the concerned authorities from time to time for regularisation of his service 4935Gl/07-26

9999

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

asGovernment servant and in the meantime to raise his salry atleast up to the level of minimum wages rates fixed for daily rated Mazdoors .

That the workman vide his representation dated 26-01-1986 addressed to the management explained his plight and prayed for regularization of his services and till that date to enhance his salary at least to the level of the rates fixed for daily rated Mazdoors . His case was strongly recommended by the then General Secretary of the P & T Residents Welfare Association vide his letter dated 26-01-1986 while forwarding his representation .

That the Asstt. General Manager ( A) of the managemet vide his letter No.STC - II/ 56-4/ 85-86 dated 06-02-1986 while considering the representation dated 26-01-1986 of the workman for regularization of his service informed him that no appointment can be made due to the ban on recruitment for creation of new posts . However , there was no reply with regard to the pray for enhancement of the salary of the workman up to level of the minimum wages fixed for daily rated Mazdoors .

That consequent thereto , the amount of monthly salary of the workman was raised from Rs.325 per monthto Rs.425 per month w.e.f. November , 1987 vide Memo No.GMT/WA -3/24/KW/5/41 dated 19-01-1988 and from Rs.425 per month to Rs . 700 per month w.e.f. 01-01-1989 videMemo No.GMT/WA- 3/24/KW dated 07-02-1989 issued by the Chief General Manager of the management . The monthly salary of the workman is sanctioned from time to time as mentioned above by the competent authority of the management and the payment thereof is made through the General Secretary of the P & T Residents Welfare Association, Sector VI, R.K. Puram , New Delhi the office of which is also located in the community centre .

The management has filed reply to the claim statement . In the reply it has been stated that the present reference is misconceived and has been made without application of mind . The appropriate Government has referred the aforesaid matter for adjudication without appreciating the fact that there is no relationship of employer and employee between Shri Hira Bahadur and the management , as such the present reference is liable to be rejected.

That admittedly Shri Hira Bahadur is allegedly working as Chowkidar - cum- Caretaker in the P & T Community Centre , P & T Colony, R.K. Puram, New Delhi and the said community centre is under the control of P & T Resident Welfare Association and Recreation Club and admittedly Shri Hira Bahadur is getting his salary/ wages from the said welfare association , as such there is no relationship of employer and employee between Shri Hira Bahadur and MTNL. It is submitted that the aforesaid association is an independent distinct and separate entity from the management/MTNL as such the present reference is liable to be dismissed .

10000

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART I SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

It was submitted from the side of the workman that he has been presently working as Chowkidar - cum- Caretaker in the Community Centre , P & T Colony, R.K. Puram , New Delhi. He was engaged as Chowkidar in the year 1976 and he is continuing in the service even today. The activities of the Community Centre are carried on under the instructions and specific sanction/approval of the competent authority of the management.

That Shri Hira Bahadur claims himself to be the employee of the aforesaid association having status and character as aforesaid filed LPA No. 35/99 and CM No.308/ 99 before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi at New Delhi against the order passed in CWP No. 5301/98 which was dismissed in limini and the LPA also met the same fate, for the simple reason that Shri Hira Bahadur could not agitate the matter before the Hon'ble High Court as the management was not his employer either as such the present reference has been made without application of mind.

Itwas submitted from the side of the management that theworkman is doubtless working as Chowkidar-cum- Caretaker in the said Community Centre . The Community Centre is under the control and supervision of the P & T Residents Welfare Association and Recreation Club . He is getting his salary/ wages from the said Welfare Association. There is no relationship of employer - employee between the management and the workman . The aforesaid association is anindependent distinct and separate entity from the MTNL. There is no privity of contract between the MTNL and the workman. There is no relationship of employer and employee betweenthe management and the workman.

That the present reference is bad for non -joinder and misjoinder as Shri Hira Bahadur has intentionally and deliberately concealed the true factum of his being engaged by the aforesaid association and has chosen to raise the present dispute only against the MTNL despite knowing fully well that there is no privity of contract between Shri Hira Bahadur and MTNL and by simply misleading the appropriate government has got the matter referred for adjudication. Admittedly there is no relationship of employer and employee , as such the present reference is liable to be rejected.

The substantial question is whether the workman was employed by the management of MTNL and payment to him was made by the MTNL.

That in order to constitute an industrial dispute there must be a relationship of employer and employee which is conspicuously absent herein . Section 2 (k) of the ID Act reads as under :

As per Section 2(k) of the ID Act, 1947any industrial dispute can be raised between the employers and the employees if there is employer employee relationship . The present dispute is not an industrial dispute in view of the definition of Section 2 (k) of the ID Act, 1947. The workman has not been able to prove that he was employed by the management of MTNL.

" 2(k) . Industrial Dispute means any dispute or difference between employers and employees or between employers and workmen or between workmen and workmen which is connected with the employment and non- employment of the terms of employment or with the conditions of labour of any person ."

That admittedly since there is no relationship of employer and employee between Shri Hira Bahadur and the management as such the present dispute does not constitute an industrial dispute and hence the reference is liable to be rejected .

The workman has admitted in his cross - examination that he was employed in the year 1976 by the Secretary , namely Shri Satpal Chopra of the Residents Welfare Association . He has further admitted that he was an employee of the Association but the community hall is under the supervision of the management of MTNL. He has also admitted that he got his salary from the welfare association .

There is another lady for maintaining the said: commuity centre . She is an employee of the Mahila . Sangathan. That lady is running the sewing classes.

Itisspecifically denied that Shri Hira Bahadur is a workman within the meaning of section 2 (s) of the ID Act , 1947 and has been in continuous service under the management. of the management . The statement is misconceived and contrary to the facts .

It isspecifically denied that Shri Hira Bahadur is working as Chowkidar-cum- Caretaker under the management as alleged in para under reply . Shri Hira Bahadur is trying to mislead this Hon'ble Tribunal by making false and frivolous allegations contrary to the records .

The lady employee has also been examined by the vorkman. She has also admitted that she was employed by the P & T Community Centre and Recreation Club. She has further admitted that welfare association is being conducted by the General Secretary of the association . Her salary is paid by the said association . She has also admitted that she has never been paid salary by the management of MTNL . She has admitted that the entire functions of the Community Centre are conducted by the welfare association .

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder . In the rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement. The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement .

Evidence of both the parties has been taken .

Heard arguments from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.

Itbecomes quite obvious from perusal of the cross- examination of these two witnesses including the workman that they have been engaged by the welfare association and payment to them has been made by the welfare association . The management of MTNL has not made any [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

payment by way of salary at any point of time . Thus, there is no relationship of employer and employee between the management of MTNL and the workman . The said association is an independent entity. The Secretary of the said association is elected by the members and the elected Secretary has overall control over the communities centre. It isrunby the fee received from marriage ceremony, social gatherings and social functions etc. The said community centre is not a department of MTNL. There is no relationship of master and servant . The said dispute is not an industrial dispute.

The reference is replied thus : -

Shri Hira Bahadur , Chowkidar -cum-Care-taker is not a workman/employee of the MTNL. The action of the management of MTNL is not regularizing the services of the said workman is just and legal . The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for .

The award is given accordingly .

Date: 22-11-2007 .

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3582.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार , भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 14/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/209/2003- आई आर ( डीयू) ]

10001

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

VERSUS

TheGeneral Manager ,

BSNL, Jind,

Distt. Bhiwani ,

Bhiwani (Haryana)

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L-40012/209/ 2003 - IR (DU) Central Government 19-01-2004 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder :

"Whether the termination of service of Shri Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Ram Kishan , Peon w.e.f. 12-7-2002 by the management ofBSNL, Jind is just and legal? If not to what relief the workman is entitled. "

Theworkman applicant has filed claim statement . In the claim statement it has been stated that the appropriate Government vide its order dt. Ref. No. L 40012/209/2003 - IR (DU) dated19-01-2004 referred an industrial dispute to this Hon'ble Tribunal- cum- Labour Court for adjudication , existing between the above mentioned parties with the following terms of reference .

That the workman joined BSNL as a casual labour as 'Peon' in January, 1991 and the last drawn salary was Rs. 1800.

That the workman worked as a Peon under the supervision and control of Shri Shyamlal ( JTO) till June , 1996.

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 29th November , 2007 S.O. 3582.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 14/2004) Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, No. II , New Delhi , as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on29-11-2007.

[No. L-40012/209/2003 - IR (DU) ]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT- IL, NEW DELHI PRESIDING OFFICER: R.N.RAI.

I.D. No. 16/2004

IN THE MATTER OF :

Shri Suresh Kumar ,

S/o Shri Ram Kishan, Vill . & Post Pandu Pindara ,

Behind Government School , Distt Jind (Haryana)

Thereafter the workman was made to work under SDO(Phone) from July, 1996 to August , 1998. During the period of 1998-99 the workman worked with SDO (Planning) under the supervision and control of Shri Kapur SinghDul.

Thereafter the department of the workman was changed from SDO ( Phone) / (Planning) to SDO ( Courier ) and there the workman from August, 1999 to July, 2001 under the control and supervision of Shri Kartar Singh Latter(SDO).

Thereafter , the workman was made to work under Sh.Dhashrat Garg, AD (TR) from July , 2001 to July, 2002. The workman used to send correspondence on behalf of the officers . Photocopies of the same are annexed as WW 1/1 (Colly). That the workman used to sign in the Stock Register alongwith the permanent employees of BSNL, Jind for receiving materials like pen , paper , eraser etc. The photocopies of the Stock Register are annexed and marked as WWI/2 (Colly).

That the management adopted unfair labour practices by changing time and again the place of work and department of the workman with the object of depriving him of status and privileges of permanent employées .

That the workman has performed his duties sincerely and with utmost dedication and honesty for a continuous 10002

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

period of more than 11 years and there was no complaint against him from any corner .

Thatit is a matter of great astonishment that in spite ofthe constant and ordinate services of the workman , the management terminated the services of the workman on 12-07-2002 without any rhyme and reason.

It is respectfully submitted that the said termination order was verbal as no written order was given to the workman by the management .

That the said termination of the services of the workman is illegal , unlawful , unjustified , arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice.

That the workman served a demand notice dated 30- 09-2002 on the management for reinstatement but the management opted to remain silent . A copy of the demand notice is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure WW1/3 .

Thereafter an industrial dispute was raised before Conciliation Officer . However , on account of an adamant attitude of the management, the conciliation proceedings failed resulting into this reference . Copy of the conciliation report is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure WW1/4.

That the workman is covered under the definition of workman as defind under Section 2( s) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. It is respectfully submitted that their exists an employee - employer relationship between the workman and the management . That the workman was working under the direct control and supervision of the management . The work done by the workman was assigned by the management . That the workman used to work within the premises of the management.

That the workman has completed more than 240days in each of the calendar year without any kind of break .

That the workman was neither issued a charge sheet nor a show cause notice was given before his illegal termination. It is respectfully submitted that even no inquiry was held against the workman before terminating his services .

That the said termination of the services of the workman amounts to ' retrenchment ' and the management has not followed the mandatory provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 .

It is respectfully submitted that the management has not complied with the mandatory provisions as mentioned under Section 25 F of the Act as neither one month's notice was given or wages in lieu of the notice nor retrenchment compensation was given to the workman .

It isrespectfully submitted that the management has also violated the provisions of Section 25 G of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 by employing and regularizing the services of the persons who were junior , to the workman namely Shri Nirula .

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] That the workman was working against a regular and permanent post. That the work is of perennial nature . It is respectfully submitted that the job on which the workman was working , still exists and even the fresh appointment has been made against the said post .

That the workman was not paid equal pay as compared to the permanent employees though the workman was doing the same kind of work as done by the permanent employees . It is respectfully submitted that the workman used to receive his salary from the concerned officials under whom the workman used to work . That the action of the management violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India .

That the workman used to mark his attendance in a register on regular basis, which is with the management. That the workman has orally and verbally demanded for the appointment letter time and again frorn the management but the demand was not been accepted by the management .

That the workman has participated in the sports day of the management and has earned certificates of appreciation . Copies of the said certificate are annexed and marked as Annexure WW1 / 5 ( cally)

TheManagement has filed written staternent . In the written statement it has been stated that the present reference is without application of mind in as such as the appropriate Government without appreciating the fact that Shri Suresh Kumar was never appointed by the answering management as such while referring the dispute has erred in coming to the conclusion that there has been termination of services of Shri Suresh Kumar as such the present reference is liable to be answered in negative .

That Shri Suresh Kumar was never employed by the answering management . It is submitted that Shri Suresh Kumar was employed through a contractor in terms of the written agreement entered into between the management and the said contractor . Both the management and the contractor were duly registered under the provisions of Contractor Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Aet and as such Shri Suresh Kumar has no right of employment with the answering management . It is submitted that on the expiry of the said contract, all the employee of the said contractor stopped coming and thereafter Shri Suresh Kumar filed the aforesaid case and appropriate Government without appreciating the facts on record have referred the present dispute for adjudication as such also the present reference is liable be answered in negative.

That Shri Suresh Kumar does not have even completed 240 days even during the period when he was employed through contractor and further more no letter of appointment whatsoever was ever issued to Shri Suresh Kumar nor was there any vacancy . It is specifically denied that Shri Suresh Kumar was working as a peon as alleged in the statement of claim . It is submitted that the answering management had appointed a contract or under the provision of Contract Act and both the contractor and [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

answering respondent were duly registered and as per the knowledge of the answering management Shri Suresh Kumar was employed by the said contractor from timeto time and during the course of agreements between the answering management and the contractor the said contractor may have deputed Shri Suresh Kumar for carrying out the job assigned to him in terms of the contract. There could be a possibility that Shri Suresh Kumar may have done some jobs here and there , however that does not mean that Shri Suresh Kumar was employed by the answering management as such the claim of Shri Suresh Kumar is not only false but also concocted and vague and ought to be rejected and present reference is liable to be answered in negative .

That the statement made in statement of claim are vague and Shri Suresh Kumar has failed to show as to for which period he was employed as alleged in the statement ofclaim. It is submitted that Shri Suresh Kumar never worked for 240 days in any calendar year, as such the claim of Shri Suresh Kumar is misconceived and the same is liable to be dismissed .

That the present reference is liable to be dismissed as Shri Suresh Kumar was never employed by General Manager , BSNL as such the present claim is liable to be rejected. Without prejudice to what is stated hereinabove and subject thereto the parawise reply on merits is as under. However , it is submitted that the said reference has beenmade without application of mind in as much as Shri Suresh Kumar was never employed by the answering management and as such there is no question of termination ofhis services.

It is denied that Shri Suresh Kumar joined BSNL as casual labour as peon in Jan. , 1991 as alleged or otherwise. It is further submitted that Shri Suresh Kumar has not stated as to what is his last drawn salary and has left-a-blank space. The answering management craves reference togive detailed reply as and when the said details are furnished. It is submitted that there was no vacancy of peon hence there was no question of appointing Shri Suresh Kumar as Peon as alleged or otherwise .

It isspecifically denied that Shri Suresh Kumar was made to work under SDO (Phone) from July, 1996 to August, 1998 and during 1998 and 1999 Shri Suresh Kumar workedwith SDO (Ping) under the supervision and control of Shri Kapoor Singh Dul . The statements made are false and fabricated.

It isspecifically denied that thereafter Shri Suresh Kumar worked with SDO ( Courier ) and frorn August , 1999 to July, 2001 under the control and supervision of Shri Kartar Sing Lattar (SDO) . It is submitted that the said statement is false and concocted and have been made with malafide intention and ulterior motives .

It is specifically denied that Shri Suresh Kumar worked under Shri Dashrth Garg, AO (TR) from July , 2001

10003

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

to July, 2002. It is submitted that no documents alleged to have been annexed as WW 1/1 are available on the record of the answering management .

It issubmitted that no reliance can be placed on the said documents annexed as WW1/ 2 collectively. As admittedly the said documents are with respect to Stock Register relating to local purchase and it seems that Shri Suresh Kumar has put his signature in the blank column and is now trying to use the same for his own benefit and Shri Suresh Kumar is put to strict proof thereof .

It is specifically denied that the answenng management adopted any unfair labour practice by changing time and again the place of work and Department ofShri Suresh Kumar with the object of depriving him of his status and privilege of permanent employees. The statements made are false and fabricated .

It isspecifically denied that Shri Suresh Kumar work for more than 11 years and there was no complaint against him from any corner . It is submitted that Shri Suresh Kumar was never employed by the answering management and he was employed through a registered contractor and the workman during his employment under the contractor seems to have fabricated the documents and is now trying to take advantage of the same . It is submitted that Shri Suresh Kumar never even completed 240 days of employment as has been informed to the answering management by the contractor , as such also the claim is misconceived and without any basis .

It is submitted that since Shri Suresh Kumar was never employed by the answering management , there was no question of terminating his services as alleged or otherwise.

It is specifically denied that Shri Suresh Kumar is covered under the definition of the workman as defined under Section 2(s ) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It is specifically denied that there existed any employee and employer relationship between Shri Suresh Kumar and the answering management . It is also denied that Shri Suresh Kumar worked under the direct control and supervision of the management and the work done was assigned to me by the answering management .

It isspecifically denied that Shri Suresh Kumar ever completed 240 days in any calendar year without any break orotherwise.

It is submitted that Shri Suresh Kumar was never employed with the answering management; there was no question of terminating his services or issuing chagesheet or show cause notice as alleged or otherwise .

It is submitted that Shri Suresh Kumar was never employment with the answering management as such there is no question of terminating the services of Shri Suresh Kumar.

It isspecifically denied that Shri Suresh Kumar was working against the regular and permanent post and work 10004

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1,1929

was of perennial nature . It is also denied that the job, on which Shri Suresh Kumar was working still exists and that fresh appointment has been made against the said post . It is specifically denied that Shri Suresh Kumar used to receive his salary from the concerned officer under whom he used to work and Shri Suresh Kumar is put to strict proofthereof.

It isspecifically denied that Shri Suresh Kumar used to mark his attendance in a register on regular basis .

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder. In the rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement. The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement .

Evidence of both the parties has been taken .

Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.

Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that he joined BSNL as casual labour in January, 1991. He worked as a Peon under the supervision and control of Sh. Shyam Lal, ITO till June , 1996. Thereafter the workman was made to work under SDO ( Phone) from July, 1996 to August, 1998. During the period of 1998 to 1999 the workman worked with SDO (Planning) under the supervision and control of Sh . Kapoor Singh Dull and he worked from August 1999 to July, 2001 under the control and supervision of sh . Kartar Singh Latter ( SDO) . The workman used to send correspondence on behalf of the Officers . He used to sign the stock register along with permanent employees of the BSNL, Jind for receiving materials like Pen , Papers , Eraser etc. The management has terminated the services of the workman illegally on 17.07.2002 without any rhyme and reasons .

It was submitted from the side of the management that the workman was never appointed by the management . He may have been employed through contractor in terms ofwritten agreement entered into between the management and the contractor . The contractor may have stopped him after the expiry of the contract . He has not completed 240 days work even when he was employed through the contractor .

The workman has filed Paper No. 19 WW 1/1 . This photocopy document is not on the letter head of the management and there is no stamp of the management . However, on these papers the workman has put his signature on 25 days . Even if these papers are admitted in evidence he has worked for 25 days in the year 2001 .

The workman has filed photocopies ofBilling Cycle Detail Hd . Post Office , Jind from 49 to 103 of 2002. He is said to have received these letters from the Post Office , Jind. These receipts are for a particular day . These bills indicate that this workman put his signature as proof of receiving cheque on 54 days .

[PART II -SEC. 3(ii) ] Hehas filed photocopies of attendance register, Paper No.104 & 105. These photocopy shows that the workman has worked for 2 months in May, 2002 and October, 2001 .

The workman has filed photocopies from 106 to 108. The name of the workman does not appear anywhere on these photocopies . In case the photocopies filed by the workman are taken into consideration it is not established that he hasworked for even 100 days in 2001 and 2002. The workman has not filed any document regarding his services renderedby him from 1991 to 2002 .

These are the entire documents which the workman has filed . The management has examined all the SDOs under whom the workman is said to have worked. They have denied the working of this workman with them . The workman has not filed any other documentary evidence in support of his case.

The workman has filed no doubt affidavit regarding his working for the period as alleged but by averments of the affidavit claim statement cannot be said to be proved . Both the parties have filed affidavit in support of their case. The management has denied that the workman ever worked with the department. In the instant case it was the duty of the workman to prove by cogent documentary evidence that he has worked for the period as alleged . All the documents filed by the workman are photocopies . Even ifthe photocopies are considered he has not worked for 240 days even in 2001 or 2002. There is no document regarding his work .

In ID cases strict and sophisticated Rules of Evidence Act are not applicable. The workman can file onlyphotocopies, the originals are always in the possession of the management . The management invariably denies the originals being in their possession . In such circumstances photocopies are sometimes relied upon if they have nexus with the original documents , if the photocopies are on the letter head of the management and they bear seal and signature of the management . An adverse inference regarding their having the force of the originals canbe drawn.

I have given my careful consideration to all the photocopy documents filed by the workman. I have perused and considered every photocopy documents . Fromperusal of the photocopy documents it becomes quite obvious that the workman has worked for 25 days in one year, in one year for 54 days and for 100 days in the year 2001 and 2002. In the circumstances the case of the workman appears to be true that the workman was engaged in exigencies and increase of work. The workman has not completed 240 days either in any calendar year or even in 12 calendar months from the date of discharge. He is not entitled to get any relief.

The reference is replied thus: -

The termination of service of Shri Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Ram Kishan, Peon w.e.f. 12/7/2002 by the management 10005

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II--खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

For the Management :

M/s K.S. Sundar M. Asha Devi BSNL, Jind isjust and legal . The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

AWARD

The award is given accordingly.

Date: 26.11.2007.

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 27 नवम्बर , 2007

TheCentralGovernment, Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 12012/ 141 /2005 - IR(B - I) dated 30.01.2006 . , referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

The schedule mentioned in that order is:

का.आ. 3583, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 6/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

"Whether the action of the imposition of punishment of censure on Sri S. Krishnamurthy, Messenger, State Bank of India is legal and justified? If not , what relief is the workman entitled for ?"

[ सं. एल -12012/ 141/2005- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ]

अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 27th November, 2007

2. After the ' receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 6/2006 and issued notices toboth sides . Both parties are entered appearance through theirAdvocates and filed their claim statement and counter statement respectively.

3. The allegation in the claim statement are briefly as

follows:

S.O. 3583. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 6/2006) Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Chennai, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India, and their workman , received by the Central Government on 27-11-2007.

[No. L-12012/141/2005 -IR (B- 1) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Wednesday, the 22th August, 2007

Present: K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 6/2006

(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub - section (1 ) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947) , between theManagement of State Bank of India and their Workmen)

BETWEEN

State Bank of India Ambedkar

I Party/

Trade Union, (Regn . No. 2329/MDS) Petitioner Union

Rep by its General Secretary No. 635 , Rani Ammaiyar Street

Periyar Nagar , Chennai -600039

Vs.

II Party/

DeputyGeneral Manager

Respondent

StateBank of India Region - II , Zonal Office Mc . Donalds Road Tiruchirapalli -620001

Appearance:

M/sBalan Haridas

For the Petitioner :

The petitioner union espouses the case of one Shri S. Krishnamurthy, working, as Messenger in the Respondent Bank at Thirumayam . The Respondent Bank imposed the punishment of censure on the concerned employee which was also confirmed in the appeal by the AppellatesAuthority . The workman concerned has joined the services of the Respondent Bank as a Messenger at the Tiruthuraipundi branch on 18.04.2003 . Later he was transferred to Tiruvarur . While he was working at Tiruthuraipundi branch, he had borrowed certain amount fromone Mr. Natrajan. After that, he had paid the substantial portion of the loan availed from Sri Natrajan . While avaliling the loan , Sri Natrajan had taken undated signed cheques without being filled with amount. After receiving the substantial portion of the amount, the said Natrajan filled up the cheque for Rs . 35,000/- and presented the same for realization on 6-01-1992 without the permission of the concerned employee . The cheque was returned unpaid , since by then , the Savings Bank Account of the Workman concernedwith Tiruthuraipundi was already closed. The said Natrajan had done this with some ulterior motive to extract more money from the workman concerned . The said Natrajan had also filed a Police Complaint against the workman alleging that the workman cheated him for having issued the cheque without an account . The Police charged the concerned employee under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and a case was admitted under CC 2078 of 1993 in the Court of Judicial Magistrate , Tiruthuraipundi . The Magistrate convicted the workman concerned under Section 420 IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 6 months and also to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- . The appeal filed against the judgement was also dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge , Nagapattinam. ,Thereby, the concerned workman filed a R. Kamatchi Sundaresan 10006

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1,1929

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ]

the Petitioner Union prays an award may be passed holding the punishment awarded to the employee concerned by the Respondent Management is illegal and arbitrary and unjust andto set aside the same .

Criminal Revision Petition before the High Court . The Revision Petition was allowed and the concerned workman was acquitted of the charges framed against him . While so , since the workman concerned was convicted by the Criminal Court, the Management dismissed the concerned employee based on the conviction . But even after the acquittal , the Respondent Bank did not reinstate the concerned employee , therefore, the concerned employee filed Writ Petition before theHigh Court in W.P. No. 22539 of 2001. Subsequent to the order passed by the High Court in the WP , the concerned employee was reinstated in service by an order dated 09-01-2002 . In that order , it is stated that the concerned employee will not be paid any back- wages or any attendant benefits from the date of discharge till the date of reinstatement . The workman joined duty without prejudice to his rights to claim back- wages for the said period . Then again, he filed a Writ Petition in WP No. 24669 of 2002 before the Hon'ble High Court challenging the order of the Respondent dated 09-01-2002 in so far as the denying the back - wages and consequential benefits . The same is still pending before the High Court . While so , the Respondent Management has issued a charge memo dated 02-12-2003 on the allegation that the employee concerned had not returned the unused cheque leaves in respect of a closed Savings Bank account at Tiruthuraipundi Branch .

(ii) When a customer, Sri R. Natrajan wanted to deposit

Rs . 35,000 on 05-12-1991 , the concerned Workman had

stopped him and convinced him to lend the money to him

and ( ili) that by this , the concerned employee resorted to

outside borrowing and issued a cheque dated 06-01-1992

to the said Natrajan without any operative account, that

the cheque when presented for collection got returned and

(iv) that the concerned workman unauthorisedly remained

absent from 18-09-1996 . For this , the concerned employee

has given an explanation but without considering the

explanation submitted by him and after nearly one decade

of the alleged incident the Respondent Bank has imposed

the punishment of censure for the same . This was , taken

only on the ground that the Workman concerned has filed

a Writ Petition against the order passed by the Respondent

Bank passed on 09-01-2002 in so far as the back -wages and

other consequential benefits concerned . The punishment

imposed on the concerned employee is mala fide intention

and for collateral purposes . Since the charge memo was

issued after a long lapse of years had caused considerable

prejudice to Workman concerned and it is in violation of

principles of natural justice . During the personal hearing

ofthe enquiry , a questionnaire was typed and the employee

concerned was made to sign in the same. Since he being

only a rmessenger , the employee concerned could not act

contrary to the wish of the Disciplinary Authority and

therefore the apology was recorded in the proceeding is

not out ofhis free will . Therefore , the punishment of censure

imposed on him is illegal and without any basis and it was

also made in almost arbitrary manner . Even the appeal

preferred by the workman concerned was rejected.Hence

4. As against this , the respondent in his counter statement alleged , as it is proved that it is an individual dispute and not relating to the termination of the Petitioner hence is liable to be rejected and it also suffers from laches and on this score also it is liable to be dismissed . The concerned employee in this case on 05-12-1991 intercepted one Sri R. Natrajan of Korakkai , one of the customer of the Respondent Bank and prevented him from depositing Rs. 35,000/- and borrowed the said Rs . 35,000/- and issued a cheque for Rs . 35,000 on06-01-1992 by using the unused cheque leaves of the Savings Bank account maintained by him inTiruthuraipundi Branch and closed thereafter . Since it was issued after closing the account, the cheque was returned for the reason that the account was closed. The said Natrajan filed a Police Case before the Judicial Magistrate's Court , Tiruthuraipundi . The Judicial Magistrate by his order dated 24-06-1996 convicted the concerned employee and the complainant Sri R. Natrajan has also written a complaint to the Respondent Bank alongwith a copy of the judgment . In view of the bar contained under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( b ) ( 1 ) and Banking Regulation Act , the concerned employee was discharged frorn Bank service w.e.f. 24-06-1996 by the order dated 18-10-1996 . The Hon'ble High Court by its order dated 15-07-1997 permitted the concerned employee to compound the offences and also acquitted the concerned employee. The acquittal order is not on merits and the acquittal is not a honourable one . In view of the order passed in the Writ Petition filed by the concerned employee , the Respondent Bank reinstated , the concerned employee , by its order dated 09-01-2002 without prejudice to its rights to initiate suitable disciplinary action against him. Therefore , the allegation that the disciplinary action was initiated after the delay of 13 years is without any substance . Therefore , the Respondent Bank asked the concerned employee to show cause, why disciplinary action should not be initiated for (i) the non- return of unused cheque leaves in respect of the Savings Bank account maintained by him in Tiruthuraipundi when it was closed , (ii) on 05-12-1991 , he intercepted one Sri R. Natrajan of Korkkai and prevented him from depositing - Rs . 35,000 and borrowed the said sum.( iii) resorted to outside borrowing, ( iv) issued a cheque dated 06-01-1992 for Rs . 35,000 by using the unused cheque leaves of his Savings Bank account maintained in Tiruthuraipundi branch and closed thereafter . ( v) the cheque returned for reason of account closed (vi ) remaining absentfromduty unauthorizedly w.e.f. 18-09-1996 . A charge sheet, was issued to him under Para 3 (iii) of the bi -partite settlement read with clause 12(e) (s) (g) of under Para 3 (iii) ofthe bi -partite settlement read with clause 12(s) (g ) of the settlement dated 10-04-2002 and also indicated that the penalty of censure will be imposed if the charges were 10007

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007 /पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

indicated the punishrnent of censure will be imposed if the carges are proved. Even though the petitioner has given a detailed explanation refuting , the charges and not accepting the same, the Respondent Bank imposed a punishment of censure against the concerned employee. Therefore, the only dispute before this forum is whether the imposition of punishment is legal and justified .

proved. After giving a personal hearing , the punishment of censure was imposed on the concerned employee and even appeal preferred by the concerned employee , it was negatived by the Appellate Authority. The concerned. employee has admitted the charges framed against him. The concerned employee has not offered any explanation that he has not committed the charges . The disciplinary proceedings was held as per bi -partite settlement and it is as per law. Therefore , the concerned employee is not entitled to any relief in this case.

Points for determination are :

(i) Whether the imposition of the punishment of censure on Sri S. Krishnamurthy, the concerned employee by the Respondent Bank is legal and justified?

(ii) To what relief the concerned Workman is entitled to?

Point No. 1

7. The learned counsel of the petitioner contended that the punishment imposed by the Respondent/ Management is with mala fide intention and for collateral purposes . Charge memo has caused suitable prejudice to the workmen concerned and the very charge memo is in violation of the principles of natural justice . He further contended it is only to harass the workman concerned and make him succumb to the pressure tactics the said charge memo was issued and imposed the punishment of censure . It ishis further contention that, during the alleged personal hearing held on 07-06-2004 no doubt a questionnaire was typed and the workmen concerned was made to sign it as if workman was seeking apology of his conduct . Since the employee concerned is working as a messenger , he cannot act contrary to the wish of the disciplinary authority and therefore the alleged apology is not out of his free will . Only on the basis of the alleged apology , the disciplinary authority imposed the punishment . Therefore , the punishment of censure imposed upon the concerned employee is illegal and as without any basis and it was also imposed in a most arbitrary manner . In this case , the order ofthe disciplinary authority viz . Ex. M14 dated 22-06-2004 is not a speaking order. He has not mentioned even one reason as to how the charge leveled against the concerned employee,was proved. Though the employee concerned has preferred an appeal against the order, the Appellate authority by its cryptic order without considering the various grounds raised by the workman concerned in a most arbitrary manner has confirmed the above order of the disciplinary authority. Hence , it is liable to be set aside . But as against this, the Learned Counsel of the Respondent contended since the Criminal Court has imposed a conviction under Section 420 IPC and in view of the bar contained in Section 10( i)(b )( i) of the Banking Regulation Actand since the employee of the bank viz . the workman concerned commits an offence involving moral turpitude, the concerned workman was discharged from the bank service w.e. f. 24-06-1996. No doubt , it is alleged the High Court vide its order dated 15-07-1999 acquitted the concerned workman but it is not a honourable acquittal given to the petitioner , The High Court has permitted the 'concerned employee to compound the offence and acquitted . Therefore , the acquittal order is not on merits and the acquittal is not a honourable one. In view of the order passed by the Hon'ble High Court in the Writ Petition , the Respondent considering the case of the cancerned employee on merits and passed an order on 09-01-2002 and reinstated the concerned employee without prejudice to its right to initiate suitable disciplinary action 6. In this case, the petitioner union espouses the cause of one Sri S. Krishnamurthy who is working as Messenger in the Respondent Bank who was censured by the disciplinary authority of the Respondent Bank. On behalf of the petitioner , Ex . W1 which is a copy of the affidavit and petition in Writ Petition No. 24466 of 2002 was filed and no oral evidence was examined on their side and on the side of the Respondent, Ex. M1 to M16 was marked and no oral evidence was adduced . It is argued on behalf of the petitioner that no doubt the concerned employee viz. S. Krishnamurthy was charged under Section 420 IPC in the Court of Judicial Magistrate , Tiruthuraipundi under CC No. 2078 of 1993 and no doubt he has been convicted by the Judicial Magistrate which was also confirmed by Appellate Court in CA No. 41 of 96. The Hon'ble High Court in Criminal Revision Petition 758 of 1996 has acquitted the concerned employee and therefore the conviction stands nullified . Even after the acquittal , the Respondent Bank has not reinstated the concerned employee in service and therefore he has to file another Writ Petition No. 22539 of 2001 before the High Court and on considering the order passed by the High Court, the Respondent/Management has reinstated the concerned employee in service vide its order dated 09-01-2001 but in that order it is also mentioned that he will not be paid any back-wages or any other attendant benefits for the period from the date of discharge till the date of reinstatement . Afterthat the concerned, employee aggrieved by this order hasfiled another Writ Petition No. 24669 of 2002 before the Hon'ble High Court challenging this order in so far as Para- 6 of the order mentioned above . The said Writ Petition is still pending before the Hon'ble High Court . While this is so, the Respondent without any reason or basis issued a charge memo dated 02-12-2003 against some alleged misconduct which they alleged and has taken recourse under Para -3 ( iii ) of the bi - partite settlement read with clause 12(e)(s)(g) of the settlement dated 10-04-2002 and also

4935 Gl/07-27 10008

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1,1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] againstthe concerned employee . Therefore , it is not correct to allege that the disciplinary action was initiated after a delay of 13 years and only after that the disciplinary authority vide its order 02.12.2003 asked , the concerned employee to show cause asto why disciplinary action should not be taken . against him . No doubt, the concerned employee sent reply dated 31.12.2003 . Since . the bank has not satisfied, framed the charge sheet as per Para ( iii ) of bi -partite settlement read with clause 12( e) (s ) (g) of settlement dated 10.04.2002 and indicated the penalty of censure" in , case if the charges are proved . Though the concerned employee sent a detailed explanation on 28.04.2004 refuting the charges , it is not an acceptable one . Since the charges were borne out of records , the concerned employee was given personal hearing on 07.06.2004 and he has also filed the admission and only after that the punishment of censure was imposed on the concerned employee and the appeal preferred by him was also rejected. Though the concemed employee preferred Writ Petition challenging the non - payment of back- wages , he has not questioned the order passed by the Respondent Bank reserving his rights to initiate disciplinary proceedings against him. The attack made by the concerned employee against the order of imposition of punishment is , that there is a delay of 13 years in initiating disciplinary action , but it is made without any substance because the concerned employee was reinstated vide order dated 09-01-2002 .-Only in that order , it is mentioned that the concerned employee will be subject to disciplinary action . Under such circumstances , it cannotbe said that disciplinary proceedings are malafide and not maintainable . If really the Respondent Bank acted in a malafide intention , the concerned workman would not have been reinstated . The allegation that the concerned employee has been acquitted and hence no disciplinary proceedings can commence is not a correct argument . Further , he has filed a Writ Petition 24669/2002 and the same is also pending before the Hon'ble High Court . It is false to allege that the concerned employee has made an apology in the questionnaire. On the other hand, he has admitted the charges framed against him and he has also admitted that he has committed all those charges. The concerned employee' has not offered any explanation that he has not committed the charged framed against him . The disciplinary proceedings were taken as perthebi -partite settlement and it is as per law and it cannot be said that it is illegal . The Learned Counsel of the Respondent further contended that the claim of the petitioner union is without substance and liable to be dismissed. Then again the learned counsel of the petitioner relied on the ruling reported in 2006 , SUPREME COURT CASES(L&S) 1121 , G.M. TANK VS. STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS wherein the Supreme Court has held " in this case the departmental proceedings and criminal case are based on identical and similar set of facts and the charge in a departmental case against an appellant and charge before the Criminal Court are one and the same and this is

a. case of no evidence . Under this circumstances , it would be unjust and unfair and rather oppressive to allow the findings recorded in the departmental proceedings to stand. Though the findings recorded in the domestic enquiry was found valid by the courts below, when there was an honourable acquittal of the employee during the pendency ofproceedings challenging the dismissal , the same requires to be taken note of and the decision in paul Anthony case , 1999, 3 , SCC, 679 will apply " and hence set aside the order ofdismissal. The next case relied on by the Learned Counsel of the Petitioner is reported in 2005 , 4 , CTC, Page 403 , p.v. Mahadevan Vs. M.D. Tamil Nadu Housing Board . In that case, the Supreme . Court has held the inordinate delay and initiating disciplinary proceedings was held to be prejudiced to the public interest and the interest of the employee . The mental agony and suffering of employee due to protracted disciplinary proceedings was more than punishment hence the Supreme Court quashed the charge memo and the employee to draw retrial benefits . The 3rd judgement relied uponby the Learned Counsel of the Petitioner was 2006, 2 CTC, PAGE 635 OF THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT IN ELANGOVAN VS. TRICHY DISTRICT CENTRAL CO - OP BANK LTD . in which the Hon'ble High Court has held " the inordinate delay in initiating the disciplinary proceedings is not valid and the Petitioner should not be made to suffer due to mistake committed by the department and the High Court further held that the Petitioner is entitled to the benefits from the date of proceedings which are impugned in the Writ Petition" . In a 4th judgement relied upon by the Learned Counsel of the Petitioner is reported in 2006, WRIT L.R. 349 , V. KANAGASABAPATHY VS. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE AND ANOTHER wherein the High Court of Madras has held " both the charges viz . the criminal court and the departmental enquiry arise out of the same incident and same set of facts and in view of the fact that the criminal court has acquitted the Petitioner on merits , it is not desirable on the part of the Respondents to proceed with the disciplinary proceedings and further held that the charge memo is liable to be set aside and allow the Writ Petition " . Relying on all these decisions , the Leamed Counsel for the Petitioner contended that in this case, charge memo was issued after a long lapse of time of the incident and action was initiated by the Respondent/Management only on the allegation that the concerned employee has issued cheque to one Sri Natrajan for the debt due to him and he has also issued the said cheque from unused cheque leaves in respect of an account whrch was closed by him even before the issuance of cheque and so on . But even in the criminal case ' filed against the concerned employce , the same set of facts was alleged and it was acquitted by the Hon'ble High Court and therefore the charge framed againstby the Respondent/ Management is not valid and the punishment imposed is illegal . But even though the learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the same set of facts were alleged in 10009 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

For the II Party/Management:

EX.No. Date Description

EX.M1 24-06-1996 Conviction Order by Magistrate Thiruthuraipund

EX.M2 05-08-1996 Complair)t lette( by Mr. R. Natarajan.

EX.M3 18-10-1996 Discharge Order

EX.M4 16-11-1996 Reply to Discharge Order

EX.M5 15-07-1999 Order of High Court , Madras in Crl .

Case No. 758/96 permitting compoounding and acquittal.

EX.M6 20-12-1999 Demand for re - instatement

EX.M7 21-11-2001 Order of High Court , Mardas to Consider the representation .

EX.M8 09-01-2002 Re - instalment withouty backwages

EX.M9 02-12-2003 Show Cause Notice

EX.M10 31-12-2003 Replyto Show Cause Notice

EX.M11 06-04-2004 Change sheet and show cause notice

EX.M12 28-04-2004 Reply to charge sheet

EX.M13 20-05-2004 Advise about present hearing on 07-06-2004

EX.M14 22-06-2004 Censure order by disciplinary authority

EX.M15 31-06-2004 Appeal Grounds

EX.M16 22-09-2004 Order passed in Appeal rejecting the Appeal.

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर , 2007

the criminal proceedings and also before the domestic enquiry and though it is alleged that the Hon'ble High court has acquitted the concerned employee from the charge under Section 420 IPC, I find the acquittal is not an honourable one . By meaning "honourable one ", it only means that it is not ari acquittal ' which free from anydoubt and when the Hon'ble High Court has perrnitted the concerned employee to compound the offence that means he has settled the issue with the complainant . Therefore , I find though it is alleged on behalf of the petitioner union that the concerned employee was acquitted on qnerits, it is not a honourable acquittal and therefore the decision relied on by the learned counsel of the petitioner is distinguishable . Even though, in this case it is alleged that there is a delay of 13 years after the incident , the charge memo was issued to the concerned employee , the charge menio was issued only after the reinstatement of the concerned employee and even in the order of reinstatement, the Respondent/ Management has reserved their rights to initiate disciplinary action against the concerned employee , the concerned employee has not questioned this reservation made by the Respondent/Management . As such, 1 find the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against the concerned employee cannot be said to be illegal . Though the concerned employee alleged that he has made the admission of the charges in the questionnaire only on the insistence of the disciplinary authority and he has made this admission not out of his free will . He has not disputed this admission even before the Appellate authority . In such circumstances , this dispute made by the concerned employee only as an after thought and it is clear that he has admitted all the charges made against him and only after the punishment was imposedby the Respondent/ Management , he has made this allegation only in the Claim Statement Therefore , I am not inclined to accept this contention, therefore on considering the entire facts and circumstances , I find the imposition of punishment of censure against the concerned employee by the Respondent/Management is legal and justified.

Point No.2

का.आ. 3584.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार तुगंभद्रा बोर्ड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय बैंगलौर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 54/89 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -42011/7/89-डी. II ( बी )/ आई. आर. (डीयू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी 7. The next point to be decided in this case as to what relief the concerned Workman is entitledto? In view of iny foregoing findings , the action taken by the Respondent /Management is legal and justified . I find the concerned employee is not entited to any relief in this case .

New Delhi , the 29th November , 2007 8 Thus , the reference is answered accordingly . (Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 22nd August , 2007)

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined :

None

For the I Party/Petitioner

None

For the II Party/Management :

Documents Marked:

S.O. 3584.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 54/89) Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Tungabhadra Board and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2007.

Ex. No. Date Description

[No. L-42011 /7/89-D . II (B)/IR (DU)] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer W1 30-6-2002 Affidavit and Petition in W.P. No. 244660 of 2002.

10010

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1,1929

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)] ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE

Dated : 12thNovember, 2007

PRESENT

Shri A. R. Siddiqui, Presiding Officer

C. R. No. 54/1989

I PARTY

Shri Mookanna & 21 Others

The General Secretary,

Tungabhadra Board Factory Workers & Civil Employees Union, T.B. Dam Bellary Dist.

IPARTY

1. The Secretary, Tungabhadra Board , BellaryDist. TBDam,

abruptly, without following the mandatory provisions of Section 25F of the ID Act and their request as well as the request of the union representing them made on several occasions with the management has fallen on deaf ears thereby compelling the workers to raise the dispute before the ALC( C) , Bellary on 18-11-1988; that during the course of conciliation proceedings , these workers and their union was able to furnish the details of number of the days worked by each of the worker and it was established that they had put in 240 days of continuous service . However, the management did not attend the conciliation proceedings on the ground that it is not an " Industry " attracting the provisions of ID Act and therefore , no purpose will be served, if participated in the proceedings . Therefore , failure report was sentto the Ministry of Labour , Govt . of India on 31-01-1989 resulting into the present reference . Therefore, the first party workmen requested this Tribunal to set aside the termination/retrenchment orders made by the management w.e.f. 27-07-1988 for the above said 16 workers and w.e.f. 01-07-1986 for rest of the six workers and they may be reinstated in service along with other reliefs.

2. The Executive Engineer , Low Level Cane1 Divison, Cantonment, Bellary .

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub- section 2A of the Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act . , 947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L- 42011/ 7/ 89 - D.II (B ) IR( DU ) dated 2nd August, 1989 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the Tungabhadra Board TB Dam, Bellary District in retrenching S/Shri Mookanna, G. Ravi , K. Venkappa Setty , K. Vonnappa, V.G Yerrappa, D. Nagabhushanam, T. Mallikarjuna, Smt. Laxmi , Eranna, Suryababu , Fakirappa, M. Rajasekar , P. Gadilingappa, Mahanandhu , Madhanna , Chandrasekhar , Veerashan , Ismail , Nailanna , Ramalinga , G. Gangappa and Narasimhulu is justified? If not, to what relief are the workmen entitled to " ?

3. The management by its Counter statement , first of all , resisted the claim of the first party workmen on the ground of jurisdiction interalia contending that the Tungabhadra Board is not an " Industry " in as much as it is not an independent autonomous body having separate legal existence . It contended that the budget of this board is incorporated in the budget of Andhra Pradesh Govt . and the expenditure incurred by it is apportioned by the Govt. ofAndhra Pradesh as well as the Govt . of Karnataka and that the board not being a corporate body has no funds of its own and therefore , the activities of the board did not come under the purview of an Industry as defined under Section 2(j ) of the ID Act and in the result, the dispute raised by the first party workers does not attract the provisions of the ID Act and is not an Industrial dispute. Without prejudice to the above said contention , the management further contended that the casual labourer is engaged in the Irrigation department on works during the specific periods which are not of continuous in nature . The maintenance of Canal for which labourers are engaged requires local labour at intervals depending upon the repair works undertaken from time to time and therefore , the engagement of the labourers depends on the exigencies of work and the board has already got surplus labour. While referring to the decision of their Lordship of Supreme Court reported in AIR 1990 SC Page 883 , the management contended that in pursuance to the aforesaid decision a lot ofcasual and daily rated workmen who had been retrenched inviolation of interim order dated 25-07-1983 , have been directed to be reinstated in serivice and whereas , there has been no direction to the management board for reinstatement of retrenched casual and daily rated workers . The management contended that while disposing of the Writ 2.The case of the first party workmen named above , as made out in the Claim Statement, isto the effect that they were employed by the management for maintenance of low level Canal and they have put in continuous service ofmore than 240 days ; that 16 of the aforesaid workers of LLC No.4 , Sub Division were abruptly stopped from work w.e.f. 27-07-1988 and six workers of Bapuram Section of LLC were stopped from work w.ef. 01-07-1986; that when the managementl /Tungabhadra Board called for list of all the daily wage workers in service in its Irrigation Branch , the names of these 22 workers were omitted to be included by the concerned officers and as such many of their juniors were taken as regular daily wage workers and these 22 workers have been left out and thrown out of their jobs [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Petition NO.17185/87 filed by one Shri S. Mahaboob against the management board for reinstatement and regularisation the High Court of Karnataka passed an order dated 09-10-1990 to consider his case in the light of the aforesaid Supreme Court's decision and therefore , it is clear that the matter pertaining to the casual labourers should be disposed of by applying the above said decision of the Supreme Court. The management lastly, contented that the case on hand is a case of engagement of casual labourers on daily wage basis and not an Industrial Dispute and therefore , on this count also the reference must fail .

4. It is seen from the records that during the first round of litigation before this tribunal after the parties entered into the pleadings, the first party workman , Shri K. Venkappa Setty was examined as WW1 and in his cross examination about 34 documents at Ex.M1 to M34 were marked on behalf of the management (NMR records) . My learned Predecessor however , recording a finding that the first party workmen have not worked continuously for a period of 240 days and that they happened to be only casual workers , rejected the reference by award dated 29-06-2001 . Aggrieved by the aforesaid award , the first partyworkmen took up the matter before the Hon'ble High Court in WP No.37972-988/2001 . His ' Lordship of Hon'ble High Court while disposing of the above said writ petitions set aside the award passed by this tribunal with a direction to this tribunal to re - hear the matter in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Range Forest Officer Vs. State of Karnataka, AIR 2002 SC 1147 and remanded the matter back to this tribunal for fresh disposal

5. During the second round of litigation, it appears that the first party workmen just filed their affidavits in stereo type format and remained absent before this tribunal to adduce any further evidence to suggest that they worked for a period of more than 240 days. In the result, my learned Predecessor by his award dated 28-11-2002, once again rejected the reference . Once again the first party workmen approached the Hon'ble High Court in WF No. 5025/05 challenging the aforesaid award passed by this tribunal and his Lordship of our Hon'ble High Court by order dated 06-06-2007 having quashed the above said award remanded the matter back to this tribunal imposing a cost of Rs.1000 on the first party workmen with a direction to this tribunal to dispose off the matter by giving opportunity to both the parties to adduce evidence .

6. Now, therefore , during the course of this 3rd round of litigation, when the matter was taken up for hearing both the parties made appearance through their counsels . Rest of the 13 workmen examined at WW2 to WW14 and in their evidence documents at Ex.W1 to W29 were marked . Thereupon , the management examined one witness on its behalf as MW1 by filing his affidavit evidence and in his examination chief got marked the documents at Ex. M35 to M44(Ex.M1 toM34 were already marked in the deposition ofWW1) .

10011

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

7. The statement of WW1 in his examination chief in nut shell is just the repetition of the averments in the claim statement . The only addition is to the effect that he started working with the management from the month of December 1984 and worked for the said month and worked for 30 days getting wages of Rs . 405 at the rate of Rs . 13.50 per day and his signature was obtained on revenue stamp on 01-01-1985 and the relevant entry at Ex. M1 . He then stated that he and others had been working with the management continuously and they have been signing the documents like EX.M1 while receiving the wages and they have done soup to July 1988. He stated that it is after July 1988 he was terminated along with 21 other employees without any notice of termination and without payment of terminal benefits . The statements of WW2 to WW14 made in their affidavit evidence is again a stereo type except on the point of actual working days they worked with the management board.All ofthem have relied upon the statement of WW1 already recorded by this tribunal as referred to supra.. 8. The affidavit evidence of the management witness is once again the repetition of the aforesaid contentions taken by the management in its counter statement, mainly, stating that the management board is not an " Industry " and that the first party workmen have not worked with the management continuously for a period of more than 240 days in a calendar year . He denied the various allegations and the statement of WW1 on the aforesaid point . He stated further that there is no appointment and dismissal order in favour of the first party and they are not even on rolls as they simply worked on repairs and maintenance of canal work for a limited period of works on temporary basis till repair works were completed under the special circumstances and therefore , the management did not require to follow any mandatory rules and therefore, their appointments were not in accordance with mandatory rules and regulations against vacant posts to be considered in this case . Coming to the documents filed by the first party, he stated that they are all cooked up without seal and signature so they cannot be looked into. Coming to the copy of the letter dated 12-12-1987 filed by the first party(Ought to have been 22-12-1987), he stated that this may be a letter addressed to the Chief Engineer but this letter did not disclose that the workmen have completed 240 days of service as the remarks column meant for that has been left blank . Coming to the case of the said Mr. Mahaboob , he stated that it is not applicable to the facts of the present case . Then he referred to the Muster Roll already filde before this tribunal (at Ex.M1 to M34) and in the last para of his affidavit he gave details of about 10 documents which were marked in his examination chief at EX.M35 to M44 referredto supra.

9. Iwould like to come to the statements of first party workmen as well as the management witness in their cross examination and the documentary evidence produced by them as and when it is found relevant and necessary.

10012

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1,1929

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)] 10. Learned , counsel for the first party workmen as well as learned counsel for the management have filed their written arguments . The gist of the arguments advanced for the first party is that as per the documents produced by them and the very documents produced by the management at Ex.M1 to M34, the first party workmen have been able to establish the fact that they have worked with the management between the years 1985 to 1988 continuously for a period of 240 days . It is specifically mentioned in the arguments that the original of the confidential report/ letter bearing No. 116 /MC/W - 86 dated 22-12-1987 addressed by Shri CLN Sastry , Superintending Engineer , Irrigation branch , TB Board to the Chief Engineer , Irrigation branch along with the statement showing the list of NMR workers in the LLC Division , Bellary whose names were not included in the seniority list as on 01-09-1987 and the original of the letterbearingNo. 1062 SR/EC2/dated 30-07-1988 of Shri Satyanarayana Murthy, Executive Engineer , Low Canal Division, Bellary addressed to the Superintending Engineer , TB Board and other important documents , production of which have been sought for from the management have been held back by the management despite the orders of this tribunal and therefore , this court can draw an adverse inference against the management for non production of those documents . He then referred to certain decisions to support his arguments that the management board is an " Industry" as held by their Lordship of Supreme Court and ourHon'ble High Court in the aforesaid decisions .

11. Whereas , the learned counsel for the management in his arguments simply repeated the statement of management witness made in his affidavit and cross examination and with regard to the production of the documents he stated that the original muster rolls have already been filed with the court and whereas , the other documents namely , the original cash bill vouchers pertaining to the first party and original service particulars of the workers of Holagunda and Bapuram and original attendance registers are not produced as those records except the original cash bills are not maintained for daily wagers and that cash vouchers have been sent to A.G. Andhra Pradesh , Hyderabad .

13. Now coming to the first question . The management to support its contention filed the documents at Ex.M36 to M41 which are the correspondence between the Govt . of India and Andhra Pradesh Govt. , the budget estimates of Andhra Pradesh Govt . , Govt of Andhra Pradesh Abstract, G.O.Ms. No. 323 and the Govt . of India Gazette dated 14-03-1955 . The management witness in his affidavit except to refer to those documents and to say that the management board does not come under the definition of an Industry has not produced any specific document suggesting that the board is not an " Industry " . Without going to discuss at length what actually these documents are , I would like to straight way go to the three decisions cited onbehalf of the first party to negative the contention ofthe management that it is " not an Industry " . These are the decisions reported in LLJ ( Kar) 1999 page 1014- Tungabhadra Board Vs. Easu and another , AIR 1988 SC 1182- Des Raj etc. Vs. State of Punjab and Others & AIR 1978 SC 548- Bangalore Water Supply Vs. Rajappa . Their Lordship of our Hon'ble High Court in which the management board itself was the party and had raised the contention that it is not an " Industry " . While taking into consideration the principle laid down by their Lordship of Supreme Court in Water Supply case and in Desh Raj and others case in no uncertain terms held that the plea of the management that it was performing sovereign functions and not an Industry and the Irrigation Department of the Government also was not an Industry were found to be devoid of merit. It was further held that the activity of the appellant (management board ) was held to be not a sovereign function but a commercial venture . Their Lordship ofSupreme Court in the aforesaid Des Raj case at Para 13 ofthe decision held that Irrigation department of the Govt . and its functions when subjected to dominant nature test elearly comewithin the ambit of " Industry " . The next ease of course is a very famous case on the point to decide as to whether the activities of the particular establishment or the management would come under the definition of the Industry or not . Their Lordship of Supreme Court in the aforesaid ease while comingto the conclusion that Industry" as defined under Section 2(j ) has a wide import laid down the following principles :

12. Now, therefore, in the light of the pleadings of the parties , the evidence and the arguments advanced on their behalf, the points now fall for consideration are:

(i) "Whether the management board does not come within the meaning of an Industry as defined under Section 2(j ) of the ID Act as contended by it" .

"Where there is (i) systematic activity, ( ii ) organized by cooperation between the employer and employee (the direct and substantial element is chimerical) , ( iii) for the production and/ or distribution of good and services calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes (not spiritual or religious but inclusive of material things or services geared to celestial bliss e.g. Making, on a large scale , Prasad or food prima facie, there is an " industry " in that enterprise.

( ii) "Whether the first party workmen p . ove that they worked under the second party management for more than 240 days continuously preceding the date of their respective alleged termination " and

(iii) " If so , whether the action of the management terminating the services of the first party workmen comes under Section -2 (oo) of the ID Act read with Section 25 F therein. "

Absence of profit motive or gainful objective is irrelevant be the venture in the public , joint , private or other sector . The true focus is functional and the decisive test is the nature of the activity with special emphasis on the employer employee relations . " 10013

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

11. Therefore, the management board in this case since distributes water through canals and it is a systematic activity and that the water comes under the definition of goods , it cannot be said that the board is performing sovereign functions and that its activities do not come under the definition of the commercial activities so as to bring it within the meaning of Industry under Section 2(j ) ofthe ID Act. Infact , as noted above , his Lordship ofHigh Court of Karnataką in no uncertain terms having followed the aforesaid two decisions of their Lordship of Supreme Court , have laid down the principle of law to the effect that the management board comes within the meaning of Section 2(j ) of the ID Act as an Industry . As noted above , the management board itself was a party to the said decision and had raised the above said contention . Therefore , on this point I must Record a finding to the effect that the management board is an " Industry " and in the result the dispute raised by the first party workmen comes under the provisions of ID Act and it is an Industrial Dispute .

the working days of the first party workmen as disclosed at Ex . W1 to W14. The only contention taken by the management that these are the documents cooked up by the first party workmen . They never contended that these are the statements prepared by the first party workmen not based upon the above said NMR register or that the particulars of the working days given by them do not conform to the entries made in the aforesaid register at Ex.M2 to M34. Now , the next important piece of evidence pressed into service on behalf of the first party workmen are the Xerox copies of the letter at Ex . W16 along with the statement of NMR workers working in LLC division, Bellary whose names have not been included in the seniority list as on 1-9-1987 and Ex. W17 once again showing the names ofthe first party as NMR workers whose names were not found in the seniority list . Of course , as contended for the management , these are the two Xerox copies of the documents/letters marked subject to objection and cannot be looked into bearing no seal and signature of the office orofficer concerned but having regard to the fact that the first party workmen did their best in calling upon the management to produce the originals of these documents and the management not producing them despite the orders ofthis court, they can be very well looked into unless the existence of the originals of these documents itself was specifically denied by the management. It is interesting to note that the management witness while referring to the above said letter dated 22-12-1987 in his affidavit at para 3(d) states as under :

"The copy of letter dated 12-12-1987 may be the alleged letter to the Chief Engineer. Without prejudice, the letter does not disclose that the workmen have completed 240 days . The remarks column in the alleged statement in respect of first partyworkmen left as blank. The provisional seniority list as on 30-11-2006 again also does not disclose for having completed 240 days in a calendar year .

14. Therefore, he never denies the existence of the original of the said letter nor he disputes of any such letter being written to the Chief Engineer by the Officer concerned. What he wanted to say is that even as per this letter the remarks column meant to show the working days has been left blank and there is no mention of the fact that the workmen have completed 240 days of service . This statement of MW1 in fact goes against the very contents ofthe said letter . This statement of MW1 is required to be read along with his statement in cross examination , when , confronted with the said letter he was to admit that it is the letter written by Shri CLN Sastry, Superintendent Engineer to the Executive Engineer along with the list of the workers during the period of their working against their respective names . When asked whether the original of this letter was under the signature of Mr. Sastry the witness was to say that he cannot say as during the year 1987 he was not working with the management. Therefore , in substance the 12. Now, coming to the next important point as to whether the first party workmen have worked continuously for a period of 240 days and more with the management. First of all the very documents namely , the NMR register produced by the management and the various entries therein marked on behalf of the management during the cross examination of WWI would make it abundantly clear that the first party workmen have been working with the management in between January 1985 and July 1988. Based on those entries in the aforesaid register the first party workmen in support of their oral testimony have also produced the Xerox copies of the statements for each of these 14 workmen to disclose that all these first party workmen had been working with the management for a periodof240days and more during the 12 calendar months preceding the date of their alleged termination i.e. termination of some of the workmen w.e.f. 27-7-1988 and some of the workmen were w.e.f. 1-7-1986 . The aforesaid statements produced by the first party of course , have beenmarked at Ex . W1 to W14 subject to objection on behalf of the management but it is very much interesting to note that though the management took up the contention in the counter statement as well as in the affidavit of MW1 that some labourers were being engaged for the maintenance and repairs of the canal work but nowhere the management denied that the first party workmen were being engaged as acasual labourer on daily wage basis . The management to disprove the case of the first party and the statements of working days given by them as per Ex . W1 to W14 have taken no pains to prepare their own such statements showing the actual working days of the first party workmen and the services rendered by them during the aforesaid period. In fact, as noted above , the very NMR register and the entries made therein marked at Ex.M1 to M34 by the management itself, in the cross examination of WW1 would support and corroborate the statement of facts showing 10014

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

existence of the above said letter and the fact that it was writtenby one officer to the other officer of the management board remains undisputed . The statement of MW1 that the letter at Ex . W16 did not disclose the fact that the first party workmen worked for 240 days is factually incorrect. While, writing the said letter and noting down the fact that names ofthe present first party workmen were not furnished as NMR workers so as to include their names in the combined seniority list dated 12-11-1987, it was noted that this was the serious default and omission on the part of the Assistant Engineer concerned as the workers are reported to have already worked for more than 240 days and they are become continuous and eligible for inclusion in the seniority list . It was further noted, if their names are not included at least , now, they are likely to go to the court as some of them have already approached the Hon'ble High Court . The statement giving out the names of the NMR workers annexed with the said letter whose names are required to be included in the seniority list as on 1-9-1987 disclosed the names of all the first party workmen . As noted earlier , there is a mention of the fact that the first party workmen have completed continuous service of 240 days and it is in this view of the matter the statement of MW1 that the letter does not disclose the actual working days in the column meant is factually incorrect and false . Now there is another letter dated 13-7-1988 at Ex . W17 written by the Executive Engineer, Low Canal Division , Bellary to the Superintendent Engineer , TB Dam once again reiterating the fact that names of these first party workmen are failed to be included in the seniority list though required to be done . The fact that said letter was written by Mr. Sathyanarayanan during the year 1988 and that Ex . W17 is the copy of the said report of the Executive Engineer has been very much admitted by MW1 in his cross examination . The relevant paras of the said letter / report at paras IV to VIII relevant for the purpose are as under :-

The sub divisional officers , I & III have submitted the list of NM Rs who were working earlier and not included their names in the list by oversight . The names of the personal who have completed 240 days as per the seniority list was prepared (as mentioned in Ex. W17) .

The cases of the personal may be considered for inclusion of their names in the permanent list of NMRs as they are having 240 days continuous service by 7/86 . They were being taken in the Muster Rolls as casual labourers when the NMR personal are required for the work of watch and ward , night patrolling on the canal .

Further 1 submit that while preparing the seniority list of NMRs , the names of sorme personal have not been included in the list, eventhough they were working in LLC4 sub division Halagunda . it is only due to non receipt of the particulars from the Assistant Engineer , No.4 Sub Division, Holagunda .

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] Subsequently representation have been received from the individual NMRs who were working in LLC sub division 4, Holagunda . Their names are also furnished for consideration for inclusion in the list (asshown in Ex.W17) .

As could be seen from the records, that the personal who were mentioned were completed 240 days, and their names may also be considered for inclusion in the list . They were being engaged on casual basis as per the necessity of the work .

The names of the NMR personal who have not completed 240 days by 7/86 are also mentioned (as shown in Ex.W17 ) However the Asst .Engineer No.4 . Sub division , Holagunda has stated that they have completed 240 days of service by 7/87 (as per list mentioned in Ex . W17).

15. Therefore , these two documents at Ex .W16 and 17 being the official correspondence between the officers ofthe management board , it is very difficult to believe that they have been cooked or fabricated by these illiterate workmen to defend their cause . Infact , these are the two documents which were the subject evidence before the Hon'ble High Court in WP No. 18229/91 . This was the writ petition filed by one Mr.S. Mehaboob seeking regularisation of his services by the managementent board undisputedly working under the board as NMR workers . The fact that said Mehaboob was working along with the present first party workmen has been admitted by the management witness at Para 3 of his cross examination . He admitted that the first party workmen were also working on NMR along with Mr. Mehaboob at the time . As noted above , Ex . W16 and W17 were produced before the Hon'ble High Court in the aforesaid Writ Petition marked as Annexure -A and Annexure-G . The management had disputed the authenticity of the documents before the Hon'ble High Court also and his Lordship of our Hon'ble High Court while referring to those documents and allowing the writ petition of said Mehaboob on pages 4& 5 of the order observed as under : --

"Suffice it to say that the documents Annexure A &G which have been produced do support the petitioner's case it would be difficult to hold that these documents are also fabricated or that they represent incorrect facts . However, I do need to take note of the submissions canvassed on behalf of the respts . and to hold that the matter was not entirely free from doubt which was why the entire difficulty has arisen . Even as of today, the petr . who was employed as a casual literate mazdoor cannot be expected to produce anything more than what he has and the court will have to take the difficult decision to hold as to whether on the basis of this material the petitioner qualifies for some relief or not . I am guided as far as this is concerned by the admission of the department that the petr . was in fact working at different periods of time and even on their admission , the commencement of these periods [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

is extremely close to the cut off date . Under these circumstances , to my mind the petr. would qualify for a relief though it would have to be suitably moulded having regard to the scanty record . The petitioner therefore succeeds ."

16. Therefore , when the very same documents have been produced before this tribunal based on which said Mehaboob who was undisputedly working with the first party workmen , has been granted relief of regularisation of his services , the management now cannot raise an objection to place reliance upon those documents with this tribunal . Therefore, as per the documents at Ex . W16 & 17 it is very much evident that the first party workmen have worked for a period of 240 days and more continuously with the management preceding their alleged termination . Based on similar set of evidence and facts between the very management and the NMR workers, the Industrial Tribunal -Cum -Labour Court, Hyderabad has also passed an award in Ex.W28 in favour of the workers setting aside the termination order passed against them with the relief of reinstatement and other benefits. Of course , this tribunal need not follow the above said award passed by the tribunal having the very same jurisdiction but there is no evidence produced on behalf of the management to show that this was the award challenged the management subsequentto May 1994, the date on which the award was juassed and was set aside .

17. Therefore , having regard to the oral testimony and the documentary evidence produced by the first party workmen and taking into consideration the very statement ofMW1 and the documents produced by the management, there cannot be any hesitation in the mind of this tribunal in coming to the conclusion that the 16 first party workmen whose names are found mentioned in the reference schedule and as mentioned in the written arguments submitted by the counsel for the first party workmen must get the relief as per law . There is no denial of the fact that there has been no notice or wages paid in lieu of the notice period or any compensation amount was paid to the first party workmen before their services were terminated. The action of the management therefore , falls within the ambit of the provisions of Section 2(oo) of the ID Act , it being a case of retrenchment . This retrenchment has not been done in compliance of Section 25 F of the ID Act and therefore , it is a case of illegal termination liable to be interfered at the hands of this tribunal .

18. Now, it is well settled principle of law that when the termination held to be illegal , the workmen will be presumed tobe in service all along and therefore , theywill be entitled to the reliefof reinstatement and other benefits .

19. In the instant case though as per the reference schedule, names of 22 workers are mentioned but before this tribunal as could be read from the writtern arguments filedby the first party advocate , he appeared only 14 workers and those 14 workers alone have given evidence before 4935G1/07-28

10015

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22, 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

this tribunal and rest of 8 workers have not turned up . Therefore, the relief will be confined to only those 14 workers whose names are mentioned in the Written Arguments of first party's advocate and who have come up before the court in support of their claims . Hence the following Award :

AWARD

The management is directedto reinstate the first partyworkmen(S/ Shri K. Venkappa Setty, G. Ravi , M. Rajashekar , D. Nagabhushana, Ramalingappa, Suri Babu , Madhanna, Gadhilingappa, Mahanandhi, Chandrashekhar , Veeresha , Ismail, Nallanna , & Narasimhalu ) in its services with full back wages from the date of their termination till the date oftheir reinstatement with all consequential benefits. No cost.

(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 12th November , 2007) A. R. SIDDIQUI, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3585.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मारक्रोवेव प्रोजेक्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय बैंगलौर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 35/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2007 को' प्राप्त हुआ था !

[सं. एल-40012/219/2003/आई. आर. (डीयू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 29th November, 2007 S.O. 3585.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 35/ 2004) Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court , Bangalore as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Microwave Project and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2007.

[No. 40012/219/2003- IR (DU)] SURENDRA SINGH , Deak Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE Dated: 1st November 2007 PRESENT:

Shri A. R. SIDDIQUI, Presiding Officer C. R. No. 35/2004 10016

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1,1929

I PARTY

Shri Gourappa Danappa Kamble ,

At& PO Hattarwad , Taluk Chikkodi ,

Belgaum District

Karnataka State

II Party

The Divisional Engineer ,

Micro Wave Project ,

Beej Bhavan , Market Yard,

Goltekdi , Pune

AWARD

1.The Central Government by exercising the powers conferredby clause (d) of sub - section 2A of the Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No.L- 40012/ 219 /2003 - IR (DU) dated 27th May , 2004 for adjudication on the following Schedule :

SCHEDULE

"Whether the management of Micro Wave Project is justified in terminating the services of Shri Gourappa Danappa Kamble ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ? "

2. The case of the first party workman , as made out in the claim statement, in brief, is that he after having passed 2nd Year PUC was appointed by the management on 01-04- 1987 to work as a Chowkidhar in the Micro Wave Project situated at Hutta Wat Station on temporary basis being paid wages of Rs . 1500 per month. He was working under the guidance and control of Sub Divisional Engineer along with other four to five employees . He worked under the management from01-04-1997 till 31-03-2002 and his services were discontinued on 01-04-2002 without assigning any reasons and therefore the action of the management in refusing work to him amounts to termination which is arbitrary , unjust and illegal particularly when a letter dated 26-12-2001 was sent from Belgaum division to the department for the purpose of regularisation of his services and instead of regularising his services he was refused work w.e.f. 01-04-2002 . Thereafter , the manageinent has been taking work from some one else which work was being carried out by him at the said project which is still running; that the first party worked for several years and has completed continuous service of 240 days and was under the impression that his services will be regularised . Therefore , the action of the management in refusing work to him amounts to termination and is opposed to the mandatory requirements of Section 25F of the ID Act read with Section 2(00) of the said Act . He therefore , requested this tribunal to pass an award in his favour directing the management to reinstate him in service with continuity of service , backwages and other consequential benefits .

3. The management by its counter statement , while, denying the allegations at Para 2 of the claim Statement however, contended that the first party worked under the management intermittently and was paid wages , accordingly . The management while denying, the averments

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] made at paras 4 to 6 of the Claim Statement further contended that the first party is not a workman within the meaning of section 2(s) of the ID Act and there was no question of compliance of Section 25F of the ID Act or the question of retrenchment as defined under section 2(00) of the ID Act. At para 9 of the Counter Statement the management contended that the department of Micro Wave is a project and as per the requirement , services of the first party were taken and he was paid wages as a casual labourer . The management denied the contention that the first party worked continuously between 1-4-1997 and 31-3-2002 and that he worked for a period of 240 days in any particular year . The management also contended that there was no question of holding any D.E. prior to the termination of the services of the first party or prior to discontinuing his services, he being a casual employee that too engaged for a particular project . Therefore , the management requested this tribunal to reject the reference .

4. During the course of the trial , the management examined one witness as MW1 said to have been working as Sub Divisional Engineer , Optical Fibre Division, under Panjim Division, Headquarter , Belgaum and got marked 5 documents at Ex. M1 to M5 . In his affidavit while stating thathe worked in the Micro Wave Proejct under the DET, Microwave Project, Pune till 08-09-1999 and has been authorized to give affidavit before this tribunal . He then just repeated the various contentions taken by the management in its Counter Statement and at para 5 of the affidavit he gave details of the days (212 days) worked by the first party during the months of May, June , July , October and November 1997 and during the months of Feburary & March 1998. The relevant averments in his affidavit at para 6 are to the effect that the first party worked only casually engaged for a particular project and the project cameto be completed in the year 1999 resulting into transfer ofall the permanent employees from Sub Division to work under D.E. Telecom Project , Panjim , Goa as evident from the letter dated 18-11-1998 issued by the Chief General Manager followed by transfer letter dated 26-08-1999 . Не therefore , averred that the first party being a causal worker working for a particular project cannot claim any right to be reinstated him in service particularly when he did not work with the management continuously for a period of 240 days ina year.

5. The first party examined himself as WW1 and got marked 7 documents at Ex. W1 to W7 . His affidavit is again justa replica of the averments made in his claim Statement . 1 would like to come to the statements of MW1 and the first party in their cross examination and the documents produced by them as and when it is relevant and necessary.

6. Learned counsel for the management filed his written arguments and his main contention was that the workman was only a casual labourer engaged in Micro Wave Project work which project came to be closed in the year 1999 itself. He further contended that the workman 10017

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

joined the services as a casual labourer fully knowing that it is a project work to be completed within a specified time. He contended that the abovesaid fact of closure of the project has been proved under documents produced at Ex.M4 & M5 . He nextly contended that the first party did not work for a period of 240 days , continuously .

7. Whereas , the learned counsel for the first party Shri Ramesh for Shri Naik, in his arguments contended that the main points to be determined by this tribunal are whether the first party worked with the management continuously for a period of 240 days and whether the first party was engaged for a particular project or not . He submitted that there is no proof made available to show that there was any project, that too , for a particular period and that the first party was engaged for such a project work . On the question whether the first party worked for a period of 240 days, learned counsel submitted that the particulars given by the management in Para 5 of the affidavit showing that the first party worked only for a period of 212 days taking support of the so called wage payment register at Ex . M3 . The very documentary evidence produced by the first party namely, Ex . W1 series will show that the first party apart from working in the months of February and March 1998 also worked for the month of December 1997. He also contended that the other documents produced by the first party show that the first party was in the service of the management all along up till the year 2001 and in this context he took support of the documents at Ex .W3 series , Ex.W5 & W6.

days if calculated along with the period of 212 days for which the first party admittedly worked with the management it can be very well found that the first party worked for a period of243 days with the management during the years 1997 & 1998 . Now the next question to be considered would be whether the services rendered by the firstparty for the above said period with the management during the years 1997 & 1998 will come to the rescue of the first party in order to show that his termination alleged to have taken place on 1-4-2002 was illegal amounting to retrenchment so as to get the relief of reinstatement and other benefits from the hands of this tribunal . The first party in order to show that he continued with the services of the management beyond March 1998 as well till his services were terminated on 1-4-2002, unfortunately has not produced any direct evidence by way of wage slips or any circumstantial evidence except his self serving statement . The first party in order to show that he was in the service ofthe management beyond the year 1998 till his services were terminated wants to take the help of a letter at Ex. W2 written by the Divisional Engineer , Telecom , M/W project whereunder the request of the first party to grant him temporary status was rejected for not fulfilling the conditions required . This letter certainly cannot be the poof to suggest that he worked with the management subsequent to March 1998. The other documents taken support of by the first party are the two copies testing reports made by KEB dated 25-11-1999 marked at Ex .W3 series and wherein his presence has been recorded and for that he has signed those papers . This evidence as argued for the management cannot be a proof sufficient in the eye of law to suggest that the first party infact was under the employment of the management and continued to be in the empioyment of the management subsequent to the aforesaid date or that he was in the employment of the management earlier to these dates . Merely, because the first party signed those documents showing his presence at the time those documents were prepared cannot be a circumstance sufficient to suggest that he was in the service of the management even as on 25-11-1999 when the documents at Ex .W3 series were prepared . Except the aforesaid two testing reports dated 25-11-1999 , the first party did not produce any other documents to suggest that he was under the employment of the management subsequent to March 1998. Now, it is well settled principle of law that in order to attract the provisions of Section 2(00) read of with Section 25F of the ID Act, the condition precedent to be fulfilled by the first party workman would be to prove that he was in continuous service of 240 days in a particular year , immediately prior to his alleged termination from the services . As noted above , though there is evidence on the part of the first party to show that he worked for a period of 243 days during the years 1997 & 1998 but as seen above , there is no evidence worth credence to establish the fact that after March 1998 he was in the service of the management and continued to be in the service of the 8. After having gone through the oral as well as the documentary evidence produced by the respective parties I find substance in the arguments advanced for the management . The most important question in the cases like one on hand when the first party workmanı comes out with the claim that he has been refused work by the management while he was working as a casual labourer on temporary basis is to determine the fact as to whether he worked for a period of 240 days continuously in a particular calendar year immediately before his services were discontinued . It is the case of the first party that he worked continuously between 1-4-1997 and 31-3-2002 and that he was refused work on 4-1-2002 . Now therefore , a heavy burden is cast upon the first party himself to substantiate the above said fact. The fact that the first party worked for about a period of 212 days in the months of May, June , July, August and November 1997 and in the months of February and March 1998 has been very much admitted by the management itself at para 5 of the Counter Statement taking support of the payment register at Ex . M3 . The fact that the first party also worked for the month of December 1997 and has been paid wages of Rs . 1500 under the receipt dated 12-01-1998 marked at Ex . W1 series has been established by the first party . Therefore , if we take into consideration the maximum period of 31 days of December 1997 for which the first party worked under the management and received the wages of Rs . 15001 , then this period of 31 10018

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] management till 1-4-2002 except the said two testing reports at Ex . W3 series dated 25-11-1999 .

alleged termination. Infact, as noted above , he produced no documents except the above said documents at Ex . W3 series , at least to show that for any period much less for a period of 240 days he was in the service of the management to be terminated from services w.e.f. 1-4-2002. The fact that the project at which his services were engaged has come to be closed in the month of September 1999 itself again is the strong circumstance against the first party to show that he was not in the services of the management immediately prior to his alleged termination on 1-4-2002 . Therefore, as the condition precedent of continuous service of240 days not being fulfilled by the first party , provisions ofsection 2(oo) read with Section 25F of the ID Act cannot be attracted in the present case . That apart, their Lordship ofSupreme Court in a case reported in JT 1997(4) SC 560 laid down the principle of law to the effect that " the daily wager had no right to posts and their disengagement is not arbitrary since they are temporary employees working on daily wages, their disengagement from service cannot be treated under Industrial Disputes Act" . Moreover , as noted above , the very project at which the first party was appointed as a Watchman being closed long back in the year 1999 itself, question of his reinstatement and grant of other service benefits to him never arises . In the result, the reference deserves to be rejected and hence the following award:

AWARD

The reference is dismissed , No costs .

(Dictated to PA, transcribed by her , corrected and signed by me on 1st November 2007)

A. R. SIDDIQUI, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3586. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार टेलीकॉम फैक्ट्री के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई टी 2/43 आफ 2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-40012/32/2000 - आईआर (डीयू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 29th November, 2007

S.O. 3586.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/43 of 2000 ) Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , No. 2 , Mumbai , as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Telecom Factory , and their workman , Which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2007.

9.Now, the next contention taken by the management is the fact admitted by the first party himself in his claim statement that he was appointed as a Chowkidar for the project in question . The management in order to substantiate this fact produced two letters at Ex . M4 &M5 suggesting that the five permanent workers who were working at the said project came to be transferred to different places under the order dated 18-11-1998 and they reported their respective offices on 9-9-1999 with headquarter at Belgaum .Of course , as argued for the first party there is no mention of closure of the project as such in these two documents but if we come to the statement of WW1 in his cross examination and the statement of MW1 before this tribunal , it can be very well gathered that the project work which started somewhere in the month of May 1997 came to be closed in the month of September 1999. When a suggestion was made to WW1 in his cross examination that the project has been closed in the year 1999, the first party neither denied the same nor accepted it giving an evasive answer by saying that he is not aware of the closure ofthe project. MW1 in his examination chief in no uncertain terims has stated that the project was completed in the year 1999 and all the permanent employees working in the project were transferred to work under DE Telecom, Panjim , Goa , which fact as noted above , has been substantiated by the documents at Ex.M4 & M5 . Strangely , enough it was elicited from the mouth of MW1 in his cross examination that the project in question came to an end by Septemper 1999 i.e. on 1st September 1999 itself. Therefore , instead of giving a suggestion to MW1 denying the fact of closure of the project, it was elicited from his mouth that the project cameto an end by September 1999 itself. Therefore , when we proceed on the assumption that the project itself came to an end on 1st September 1999 itself, then the question of the first party being in the employment of the management or at the said project atleast beyond 1st September 1999 will never arise, even assuming for a moment that he was in the employment of the management uptill the above said closure date . Now it is again well settled principle of law that employees engaged with a particular project will have no right to claim their employment with the management afterthe completion of the project. The principle laid down bytheir Lordship of Supreme Court in a decision reported in 2006(7) SC cases 161- Principal Meharchand Polytechnic and Others Vs. Anulama & others may be referred in this context . The fact that the burden of proof in the cases like one on hand will be on the shoulders of the first party and not on the shoulders of the employer , is again a proposition of law settled and the principle laid down by their lordship ofSupremeCourt reported in a decision of (2006) 9 SC cases 124- Chief Engineer Ranjit Sagar Dam Vs. Shamlal . Therefore , in the instant case the first party , first of all has failed to establish the fact that he worked continuously for a period of 240 days in a calendar year immediately prior to his

[No. L-40012/32/2000- IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI

PRESENT

Shri A.A. LAD, Presiding Officer REFERENCE NO . CGIT- 2/43 OF 2000 Employers in Relation to the Management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

The Chief General Manager ,

Telecom Factory,

1stParty

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. , Deonar , Mumbai 400088.

AND

Their Workmen,

The President

Rashtriya Telecom Employees & Workers Union, 63, Sarith Vishwakarma Nagar,

Mulund (West) , Mumbai 400080. (Ashokkumar Hazarilal Jain) ,

10019

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

2nd Party--Union

General Secretary

Appearances :

Forthe Employer

Mr. B.M. Masurkar ,

Advocate

For the Workmen

Mr. M.V. Palkar , Advocate

Date of reserving Award : 23rd July, 2007 Date of Passing of Award : 7th November , 2007

AWARD PART II

The matrix of the facts as culled out from the pro- ceedings are as under:

1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi , by its Order No. L-40012/32/2000/IR ( DU ) dated 30th May, 2000 in exercise of powers conferred by Clause (d) of sub -section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the Management of Telecom Factory, now taken over by the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Deonar , in terminating the services of Sh . A.H. Jain is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

2. By filing the Satatement of Claim, at Exhibit 6, the 2nd Party Workman and General Secretary of the Rashtriya Telecom Employees & Workers Union, Submit that, en- quiry conducted against 2nd Party workman viz . Ashokkumar Hazarilal Jain was not conducted by follow- ing principles of natural justice . No opportunity was given to the 2nd Party workman to attend the enquiry . That , 2nd Partyworkman was drawing salary of Rs . 10,000/-per month and fall under the definition of workman under section 2( s) of the Industrial Disputes Act as he did 70 % of the duties assigned manually and 30 % were clerical . He was having no authority to appoint anybody or to remove anybody . He had no power to sanction anybody's leave and had no authority to initiate any disciplinary action against any of the workman. He had no authority to sign any Bank account on behalf of the 1st Party and had no authorityto withdraw the amount for the 1st party . He was not Consti- tuted Attorney of the 1st Party . His Principle duties were of technical and operational in nature and there was no even a stinct of supervisory duties as far as his duties were concerned. He was working as per the instructions received by him from his superiors . False allegations were levelled against him . Farce of enquiry was made by the 1st Party. Enquiry Officers was bias . Other employee by name Rane , though was served with similar type of charge sheet like 2nd Party workman , Rane , he was never placed under sus- pension like 2nd Party Workman . At that particular time Apex Court treated 1st Party not an Industry . So employee did not attend Inquiry . Later Apex Court decided.other- wise and observed 1st Party as an Industry. The findings givenby the Enquiry Officer are perverse . The punishment of"Compulsory Retirement " of 2nd Party workman is noth- ing. but terminating his employment at the age of 52 years as retirement age in the 1st party is 60 years . So it is submit- ted that action taken by first party in retiring compulsory second party workman by order dated 9th July, 1999 is noth- ingbutterminating him from employment and requestedto set aside with the directions to reinstate him with benefits ofback wages and continuity of service .

3. This prayer is disputed by the First Party by fill- ing exhaustive reply at Exhibit 7 stating and contending that, reference is not tenable as subject matter of the Refer- ence " Compulsory Retirement " does not fall within the purview of Section under which the Competent Authority send the reference for adjudication . It was not the termina- tion. It is further stated that , 2nd Party Workman by name 'Jain' is not the workman and as such on that count also Reference is not tenable . It is also contended that, subject matter of the Reference "Compulsory Retirement " does not fall under the definition of " Termination " . This Tribu- nal has no jurisdiction to give verdict on compulsory re- tirement. Besides this , it is contended that, charge sheet was served on second party workman . Full opportunity was given to 2nd Party Workman . , " Jain " to participate in the enquiry. Enquiry Officer was having foundation to give finding against the 2nd Party Workman . Even the Punish- ment awarded by the Enquiry Officer of termination was reviewed by the Appellate Authority and leniency was shown . In the appeal , the the 2nd Party was permitted to retire by which he got all retirement benefits i.e. grauity, Pension , Provident Fund etc. If at all , he would have been terminated , he could not have got those benefits and as relief was as such relief was given to the Second Party Workman by asking him to retire compulsorily .

4. It is further state that, 20 persons were working under him. He is getting his salary more than Rs . 10,000/- 10020

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

Issue No.3:

8. In fact this Issue is framed on the pleadings of the parties in the reference act of the Management in the termi- nating the services of Shri Jain i.e. of concerned workman is in question inviting to see whether said action is legal and justified ? However , this issue is framed by my Ld . Predecessor taking it from the pleadings of the parties where case of compulsory retirement of Shri A.H. Jain i.e. ofthe concerned workman is taken . So , now the question is whether , he was asked to retire or whether he was termi- nated as mentioned in the Schedule or as mentioned in the Issue respectively?

Hehas control over the 20 workers working under him . He was sigining their muster , attandance and sanctioning their level . He commited serious offence like ' forgery' which is of very serious nature . Such changes were levelled and proved against him . Though opportunity was giving but he did not utilize it and did not participate in the enquiry. As decision to retire 2nd Party Workman , Jain was taken after conducting enquiry, now 2nd Party work- man , Jain, cannot challenge it as subject matter of" com- pulsory retirement" does not fall within the jurisdiction of this Tribunal , reference send presuming that 2nd Party workman is terminated has no meaning .Actually said pun- ishment of termination was reviewed by Appellate Au- thority and he was compulsorily retired. In fact deci- sion of the 1st Party is of compulsory retirement . It ought not to have been challenged by 2nd Party . Since the pun- ishment of 'termination' does not subsists , reference send undet said guise be rejected as Tribunal cannot travel be- yond'subject matter of " Termination " and give verdict on "Compulsory Retirement " .

5. Inveiw of the above pleadings my Ld . Predeces- sor framed Issues Exhibit 12. Out of those Issue Nos . 1 , 2 , 4 and 5 were treated as preliminary Issues which I decided by passing Award Part I on 18th May, 2006 observing enquiry not fair and proper. Besides I observe findings perverse and directed Management to lead evidence to prove the charges levelled against the Second Party Workman and justify its action .

6. The said order was challenged by the 1st Party before the Hon'ble Bombay High Court by filing Writ Peti- tion No. 2543 of 2006 where it was turned down , filed by the Management said decision was then challenged be- fore the Division Bench by filing Appeal No.764 of 2006 where also prayer of the Management was not considered.

7. As a result of that , now further stage is of record- ing evidence on punishment as well as on charges levelled against the concerned workman i.e. to see whether action taken of compulsory retirement is fair or not is now come up before me for which issues have already been framed by my Ld . Predecessor at Exhibit 12 which 1 answer as follows:

Issues

Findings

Yes

3. Whether Sh . A.H. Jain was compulsorily retired by way

of punishment for misconduct?

6. Whether the action of the

Management of Telecom Factory in connection with Sh . A.H. Jain is legal and proper?

He is en-

7. What relief the workman is entitled to?

titledfor rein-

statement

with50%

back wages

9. In the entire Reference pleadings of both is that concerned workman i.e. A.H. Jain initially was terminated and then he was asked to retire compulsorily. Even in the written statement management has made out the case that , initially he was penalized with punishment of removal from services and then said punishment was converted into punishment of " Compulsory retirement " by the Appellate Authority. Besides , case made out by the management that , compulsory retirement is soft punishment than the punishment of removal from services . According to Management removal from services does not give any pensionery benefits to the employee , whereas employee who is compulsorily retired gets all monetary/ pensionery benefits as if he is treated as retired at the age of superan- nuation . As far as this concept put up by the Management isconcerned , it is not disputedby the 2nd Party . However , fact is that , 2nd Party is asked to retire compulsorily. In fact 1st Party ought to have get amended said to that effect but record reveals that , it remained as it is . Moreover , the cor- respondence was made by my Ld . Predecessor about change in name of Management which was changed from "Telecom Factory " to " Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd " . and by corrigendum dated 17th March, 2006 it was corrected . How- ever, no any correspondence on the subject matter of this i.e. whether 2nd Party was compulsorily retired or whether he was removed from services appears made to get clarifi- cation on it . The fact is that , the concerned workman was asked to retire compulsorily as taken by my Ld . Predeces- sor in this Issue and on basis of that, finding is given by the enquiry officer and then by Appellant Authority con- verting the decision of removal to retiring concerned work- man compulsorily from the servies on account of miscon- duct. The enquiry was conducted . Finding was given by the Enquiry officer and punishment of removal was awarded. It schallenged by the 2nd Party before Appel- late Authority , which converted " removal from services " into " compulsory retirement " from services . The charge of misconduct was levelled i.e. of leaving the work place with- out permission and preparing false gate pass to enable the concerned workman to leave the Gate or Work place . So as far as the gravity of Issue is concerned, I conclude that, the concerned workman was compulsorily retired by way of punishment for misconduct . As 1 have to answer that much nothing more than that require to discuss here .

10021

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Issue Nos. 6 & 7 :

Reasons:

10. By these issues question of on quantum of punishment arises . Here we have to decide whether quan- tum of punishment of " compulsory retirement " from ser- vice is just , proper and what relief is to be given to the 2nd Party?

11. At the cost of the repetition we find charge was levelled against 2nd Party workman of leaving work place without permission and change to fabricate the Gate Pass is leveled, charge of forgery is leveled to enable him to leave the Gate . Both these things are denied by the con- cerned workman. 1st Party tried to prove the charge of forgery and charge of leaving the work place without per- mission by the concerned workman by examining number ofwitness viz . by examining Mr. M.Y. Siddiqui, Mr. B.S. Sahu , Mr. G.B. Sable and Mr. A.S. Sonawane . By examin- ing workman himself said is denied making out story that work place was left with due permission. By examining all these 4 witnesses Management tried to point out that , con- cerned workmah with his colleague i.e. Rane he left the Gate on Pass No. 53. Said gate pass is produced before this court which is exhibited at Exhibit 48. It is pertinent to note that, said Gate Pass No.53 bears names of 4 persons . The story of the prosecution is that , initially said pass was prepared for Mr. Saukar and Mr. Gurav. It is alleged by the Management that, this workman i.e. Jain and one Mr. Rane manipulated their staff number on the pass and wrote it on the said gate pass and then left the Gate. As far as leaving gate on 12-2-1997 on Gate Pass No.53 is concerned , it is not disputed by the concerned workman . On the contrary it is the case of the 2nd Party Workman that , as there was major fault in the town , he being Supervisor , went along with Rane , Sahu and Gurav to assess the situation and correct it. So the charge of leaving gate on gate Pass No.53 on 12-2-1997 is concerned , is not disputed by the con- cerned workman . Even it is a matter of record that , Rane was prosecuted. He was also asked to retire compulsorily. Said Mr. Rane challenged the said compulsory retirement action of the Management before Central Government In- dustrial Tribunal & Court No.1 in the I.D. Reference No.7 of2002. In the said reference disputed action taken by the management of compulsory retirement of Rane was up- held. However , in that case CGIT No.1 observed that ,en- quiry was fair , proper and finding not perverse . Against that, I observed enquiry is not fair and proper as far as this workman Jain is concerned. Said order was challeged be- fore Hon'ble Bombay High Court by filing Writ Petition and then by filing an Appeal before Division Bench where Management did not get any success . No doubt Hon'ble High Court observed that 1st Party can challenge entire decision before it if it did not agree with the findings given by this Tribunal on remaining part of the proceedings .

PassNo.53 is concerned , is not disputed to anybody. Ques- tion before us is whether , concerned Workman left the gate with permission or left the gate with false permission? It is a fact that, on 12-2-1997 concerned Workman left the gate on Gate Pass No.53 . It is the case of the 2nd Party that he left the gate with proper permission of the Management as his Staff number was mentioned on gate Pass No.53 . As faras mentioning staff number of concerned workman on gate Pass No.53 is concerned , is also not disputed . We find 4 Staff Numbers were mentioned on gate Pass No.53 . Staff No.8484 , 8655 and Staff Numbers of Savarkar and Guravwere also mentioned on Gate Pass No.53 which per- mit them to leave the gate. The case of the concerned work- man is that his act of leaving the Gate was with permission . Against that , case of the Management is that , Staff No.8484 and 8655 which were underlined were manipulated by Rane . Said fact is denied by Jain. When main charge is denied by Jain i.e. concerned workman then burden shifts on the Man- agement to that how it can be said that Staff Nos . 8484 and 8655 were manipulated by Jain ? As far as this aspect is concerned, management has examined 4 witnesses but nobody has stated that , that it is written by concerned workman i.e. by Jain and that is in his handwriting . Even handwriting on the Gate Pass No.53 about Staff No.8484 and 8655 is not proved written either by Rane or by Jain. When it is not proved , like that in my considered view, that blame cannot be casted on the concerned workman only because he is an employee . In fact burden shifts on the Management to prove that, said numbers were manipu- lated and concerned workman to leave the gate . Even charge was framed of manipulation of numbers on Gate Pass No.53 . Even there was separate enquiry . The wit- nesses examined by the management before this Court are sticking with the evidence recorded by the Enquiry Of- ficer . However , said evidence and the evidence recorded before me does not reveal that, Staff Nos . 8484 and 8655 were written by the concerned workman and he is respon- sible for it . No other efforts are made by the Management by referring said Gate Pass No.53 to Handwriting Expertto obtain opinion on handwriting of the expert. Besides, Crimi- nal case filed by the Management resulted into acquittal. Evenappeal against it was also turned down by the Hon'ble High Court . So all this reveals that, charge of manipulation of Gate Pass No.53 by showing Staff Nos . 8484 and 8655 byMr. Jain or Mr. Rane is not proved. When said manipu- lation is not proved question arises , how concerned Work- man, Jain, can be held responsible ? The Ld. Advocate for the 1st party tried to point out the judgement of Rane given by CGIT - 1 in Reference No. CGIT - 1 /7 of2007 where CGIT/ 1observed enquiry fair and proper . However , in case of Jain observed equiry is not fair and proper. The view taken by me is not yet disturbed by the superior Courts . So I find facts of that case are different than the facts of this case . Here I observed charge of manipulation leveled against Jain i.e. against concerned workman is not proved . So I conclude that, the Management failed to establish charge of manipulation of Gate Pass No.53 against concerned Workman i.e. Jain .

12. So as far as charge of leaving work place or leaving Gate on 12-2-1997 by concerned Workman onGate 10022

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) )

Babu Gupta vs. U.P State Roadways Transport Corpora- tion and Ors ), 2000 LAB I.C. page 2584- Gujarat High Court . (Divisional Controller , S.T. Corporation , Bhuj vs. Virji D. Barot).

( 16). By referring these number of judgments Ld . Advocate for the 2nd Party tried to point out that , the punishment given on such a charge is not proportionate . Instead of burdening the judgment referred I feel not it is necessary simply to I accept the analogy behind it where I find for such alleged charge , punishment of compulsory retirement is harsh one .

(17). So instead of maintaining the punishment given by 1st Party to 2nd Party Jain of compulsory retirement, 1 feel it necessary to interfere in it and to conclude that, 2nd Pary Jain must be reinstated by the 1st Party .

(13) Now, the question of leaving gate on 12-2-1997 is not disputed by the concerned Workman. He admits that he left the gate on 12-2-1997 on Gate Pass No.53 . As observed above it is 1st Party who is unable to prove that, the Gate Pass No. 53 was manipulated by Jain to enable him to leave the gate . It reveals that , there was Staff num- ber of Jain which permit Jain to leave the Gate . Said Gate Pass is the record of the 1st Party. Even enquiry was con- ducted on the basis of it . When Gate pass bear the Staff number of the concerned Workmen and on the basis of it when Jain left the gate and when it is not proved that said was written by concerned Workman I am of the opinion that , there is nothing illegal in leaving the gate . On the contrary it proves that Jain , left the gate with permission of the authority. So charge of leaving gate without permis- sion is also not proved against the concerned Workman . Whencharge of manipulation or forgery of Gate Pass No.53 and charge of leaving gate without permission is not proved against concerned Workman , I conclude that , 1st Party cannot hold Jain guilty of the charges and punish him on that basis.

(14) When 1st Party cannot punish Jain without prov- ing charge of forgery and leaving Gate without permission, I conclude that, 1st Party must treat Jain as its employee till he attain the age of superannuation .

(18) 2nd Party Jain pray for reinstatement with benefit of continuity of service . However, it is a matter of record that, 1st Party is Government , public institution which is providing facility communication to the people of this country . It is also a matter of record that 2nd Party did not work for 1st Party from the date of his compulsory retirement. When he did not work for first Party it means that he did not work for nation . When he did not render his services to the public body like this , which is providing the communication services to the people of India and nation and it does not feel it proper now to give giving directions to the 1st Party to pay full back wages as it is not just and proper. However, punishment of removal at the age of 52 for committing such a meager act of leaving work place and gate without permission appears rather harsh enen if one presume that , the said charge is proved against the concerned Workman . The record and proceedings and discussions made above reveals that, said charge is not proved against the concerned workman . When said charge isnot proved against concerned workman , in my considered view said workman cannot be punished by such a punishment of compulsory retirement as compulsory retirement is nothing but it is " an end " to the services life . Besides no specific case is made out by both about financial position and source of income of 2nd Party workman . So , I conclude that , 2nd Party also must be reinstated with 50 % back wages . Hence , the order :

ORDER

(i) Reference is partly allowed;

(ii) 1st Party is directed to reinstate the 2nd Party workman andgive him benefit of50 % back wages from the date of his complusory retirement till he attains the age of superannuation;

(iii) it is learnt that , 2nd Party might have attained the age of 60 years . So , I direct 1st Party to treat 2nd Party Workman in its employment till he attains the age of 60 years and give him benefits on the basis of 50 % back wages with other monetary benefits attached to it ;

(iv) In the cirumstances there is no order as to its costs.

A. A. LAD, Presiding Officer

Mumbai,

(15) In the written arguments it is pointed out that , age of superannuation in the establishment of 1st Party is 60 years . 2nd Party made out the case that he was sus- pended when he was of 52 years old . He lost his 8 years employment age which was at his credit when he was asked to retire compulsorily. Even 2nd Party's Advocate relied on number of judgements produced at Exhibit 56 to sup- port his case viz . 1982 ( 45 ) FLR SC page 432 ( Between Ramakant Mishra & State of U.P. and Ors .) , 1989 I LLJ SC page 71 (Scooter India Ltd. , Lucknow and Labour Court , Lucknow) , 1999 II CLR SC, page 8 (State Bank of India & Ors. Vs T.J. Paul ), 2005, Page 1092 I LLJ Gujarat High Court (BetweenJagdishcandra Maganlal Trivedi And State Bank of India) , 2000 II LLJ page 1212 Guj High Court ( Between Hindustan Fertiliser Corporation Ltd. and Nakul Chandra Borkakoti ) , 2005 III CLR page 595 Bom . H.C. ( Municipal Corporation for the City of Kalyan and Dombivali vs. R.C. Baania) , 2000 LAB I.C. page 3392 - Karnataka High Court- (N.C. Charati vs. Personnel Manager and Disciplinary Au- thority , Syndicate Bank , Manipal & Ors ), 2000 III CLR page 388 -Allahabad High Court- ( Harpal Singh v . State Public Services Tribunal , Lucknow & Ors . ) , 2005 III CLR Page 466-High Court of Delhi- ( Bhagirath Singh (Ex . Const . Driver vs. Union of India) , 2005 III CLR Page 469 ( Madras High Court) (Hotel Ambasador Pallava vs. Presiding Officer , Jind Additional Labour Court & Anr. ) 2005 III CLR page 978- Karnataka High Court (Management of North-West Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation , Belgaum Division, Belgaum vs. B.R. Gudugatti) , 1995 I CLR page 121-Madras High Court-(M . Bose vs. Director General Central Industrial Security Force, New Delhi & Ors . , 1995 CIR page 851 - Bombay High Court- Gimi Kamgar Sena & Ors vs. S. R. Rane & Ors. ) , 1995 I CLR page 704 - Calcutta High Court-(Arjun Kumar Biswas vs. Union of India & Ors .) 200 LAB I.C. page 2678 -Allahabad High Court ( Ram

7thNovember , 2007

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3587. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार कैण्टोन्मेन्ट बोर्ड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 2, मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई टी 2/98 ऑफ 2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-13012/6/2000- आई. आर. (डी.यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 29th November , 2007 S.O. 3587.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/98 of2000) Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, No. 2, Mumbai, as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cantonment Board and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 29-11-2007 .

[No. L- 13012/6/2000- IR(DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALNO.2

MUMBAI

PRESENT

A.A. Lad, Presiding Officer REFERENCE No. CGIT-2/98 OF 2000 Employers inRelation to the Management of Cantonment Executive Officer, Deolali Cantonment , Deolali -422401

...1stParty

And

Their Workmen

Shri Uttam Gangaram Salve, 26, Hadola, Deolali Camp , 422401, Tal, & District Nashik.

...2nd Party

APPEARANCE:

For theEmployer : M/ sC.R. Naidu & Co. , Advocates .

For the Workman : Mr. P.V. Sathaye, Advocate .

Date of reserving Award: 23rd July, 2007 .

Date of Passing of Award: 2nd November , 2007

AWARD

The matrix of the facts as culled out from the proceedings are as under :

1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour, New Delhi , by its Order No. L- 13012/6/2000- IR(DU) dated 28th 4935G1/07-29

10023

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

September, 2000 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section ( 1) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the Management of Cantonment Board , Deolali in not regularizing and reinstatement in employment of Sh . Uttam Salve , casual labour w.e.f. 31-3-1996 is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the workman concerned is entitled?"

2. To support the subject matter referred in the reference , Second Party filed the Statement of Claim at Exhibit 15 narrating the creation of Cantonment Board, describing its functioning , formation of it and how Government is controlling it . He also referred various disputes raised by workman with the Cantonment Board and then coming to his says that , he was appointed temporarily as a Peon in primary girls school for a period of 60 days between 1st July, 1984 to 29th August, 1984 on daily wages ofRs . 11.05 Ps. he further states that, then he was appointed for 15 days on 10-2-1987 on the same daily rate wages and then was called for interview by letter dated 14th July, 1987 for the post of Safaiwalla. He worked for 90 days . Thereafter letter was issued to him dated 16th May, 1991 asking him to attend for medical examination for the post of Safaiwalla . Though others were also called with the 2nd Party workman , and though formalities of interwiews were completed however those were not worked out and no appointment letter was given to anybody . The grievances made by him are that though he made it with various authorities through Union leaders and political persons but he did not received any benefit of it . So he approached the Labour Commissioner (Central ) with his grievances and request to direct 1st Party to recruit him as per the interview taken with effect from 31st March, 1996 with result of benefits and continuation of service .

3. This is disputed by the 1st Party by filing reply at Exhibit 25 , admitting number of things mentioned by 2nd Partyworkman more percisely regarding formation of Board, functioning of it, cantrol of it and Rules and Regulations under which it is working . It also admits the work done by 2nd party on daily wages in Primary School on 2occasions . However, 1st party denys that , 2nd party is entitled for recruitment and he has right to be recruited in the services ofthe 1st party. It also challenges the right of the 2nd party to call record of recruitment process and request madeto scrutinized by this Court. It also challenges the status of the 2nd Party and his relations with the 1st party.

4. Inviewofthe above pleadings my Ld . Predecessor framed issues at Exhibit 33 which I answer those against it as follows:

Issues

Findings

No (1) Whether Salve proves that he was engaged by management Cantonment Board?

No (2)Whether the reference is maintainable as averred in W.S. Para2 (C) and 5?

10024

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

No (3) Whether Salve proves that he was terminated by management . Cantonment Board?

(4) Whether the action of the Management of Cantonment Board , Deolali in not regularizing Shri Salve Casual Labour w.e.f. 31-3-96 is legal andjustified?

conclude that, 2nd Party was not engaged by the 1st Party. Hence, I answer this Issue in the negative.

ISSUE NO . 2 :

Does not

arise

(5) Whether the action of the Management ofCantonment Board , Deolali in not reinstating in employment to Shri Uttam G. Salve is legal and justified ?

Does not

arise

(6) What relief, he is entitled to ?

As per order below Reasons:

ISSUE NO . 1 :

(5) It is the case of the 2nd Party that , he was engaged by 1st Party. It is denied that 1st party i.e. Cantonment Board . If we peruse the pleadings of the 2nd Party on that point where he referred his appointment as a Peon in primary school for the period of 1-7-1984 to 29-8-1984 and then for 15 days in 1987. We find these are the only two appointments got by the 2nd Party in Primary School and that , too on daily wages . As far later portion of the 2nd Party is concerned which is pertinent to recruitment process followed by the 1st Party and interview call given as well as to 2nd Partyto attend medical examination is concerned , it is a part of the recruitment which 2nd Party cannot challenge . The period admittedly served by the 2nd Party of two month i.e. from 1-7-1984 to 29-8-1984 and then of 15 days w.e.f. 10-2-1987 if read it does not permit us to count it as requisite period to claim the employment with the 1st Party . Admittedly his appointment from 1-7-1984 to 29-8-1984 and 15 days appointment from 10-12-1987 at the mostcomes upto 75 days and it does not fulfil the condition of240 days employment in order to claim employment of the said institution . Besides it is not mentioned who is running that Primary School and whether 1st Party is concerned with it ? Even it is not shown whether 1st Party is runing primary school and whether 2nd Party worked for 60 days in 1984 and 15 days in 1987 ? So , this admitted position does not establish relationship of the 2nd Party with the 1st party to call him as an employce of the 1st party . There is no appointment order to given to 2nd Party and issued by the 1st party to show that, he was engaged by 1st Party. The later part of the pleadings of 2nd Party that he was called for medical examination but did not get the appointment , itself reveals that , he was not engaged after following selection process . All this reveals that , he was not engaged hy the 1st party i.e. Cantonment Board. From the evidence led by 2nd Party by filing affidavit in lieu of examination in chief at Exhibit 41 and other evidence produced does not reveal that , he has evidence about his employment with 1st Party. So all this lead me to (6) 1st party has made out the case that, the reference is not maintainable making out the case that, reference sent by Labour Commissioner ( Central ) was sent mechanically and as such not tenable . As far as sending of reference by Labour Commissioner (Central) is concerned, it cannot be challenged before this Tribunal. At the most subject matter of the reference can be challenged before this Tribunal and not the decision of the Labour Commissioner (Central ) of sending Reference to the Government . At the most 1st Party can made out the case that Reference is not tenable since there is no relationship of employee and employer between the 1st Party and the 2nd Party and the 2nd Party is unable to prove that he worked for 1st Party for more than 240 days to claim employment. Besides , 2nd Party is unable to prove his employment with the 1st party . When these things are not there , 1 conclude that , the Reference is not maintainable means the subject matter of the reference is not maintainable . So , I answer this Issue in the negative. ISSUE NOS . 3 TO 5 :

(7) By these Issues , burden is casted initially on 2nd Party Workman to show that, he was illegally terminated . Whenburden is shifted on first Party to show that , by non- regularising 2nd Party workmen , decision taken by it is legal and justifiable and in not continuing the 2nd Party in the employment is just and proper . So the tone of the subject involved in these issues is one and the same . By these issues we have to decide whether present position of 2nd Party Workman remaining away from 1st Party's employment is justifiable and who is responsible for it ?

(8) As stated above , 2nd Party is unable to show his relations with 1st Party . He is unable to show that , he served for 1st Party . He is unable to show that , he was recruited by following due process of law by 1st party . Besides , he is unable to fulfil the conditions of employment with 1st party ofworking for 240 days .

(9) 2nd Party challeges the decision of the 1st party of not recruiting him in the employment cannot be the subject matter of the dispute as selection , is the discretion orprerogative of the employer which one cannot compel the employersto take decision of selection . When 2nd Party was not selected and recruited said cannot be challenged as an Industrial dispute as it is not defined u/section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 . Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 is specific and the provisions made to the employees ' dispute or employer's dispute which is connected with the employment or non - employment . Said definition does not cover non- recruitment of the employee in the employment . It also does not give right or scope and covers non-selection of the employee for employment . Here 2nd Party has challenged his non- sclection u/ section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. Besides , he was not terminated since hisappointment for two occasions in 1984 and then in 1987 10025 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

Between:

The Management of the

Chairman,

Kalinga Gramya Bank,

H. O. Friends Colony ,

Bajrakabati, Cuttack- 753001..... 1st Party Management

(and)

Their Workmen , represented

through the

CuttackGramya Bank

Karmachari Sangha ,

that too was on daily wages. When he was appointed on daily wages that too in primary school for which relations of 2nd Party did not established with 1st Party , I conclude that , the said employment of the 2nd Party with Primary school does not prove that he is entitled to call as an employee of the 1st Party and establish his relations with 1st Party. Besides that, he cannot claim that , he was terminated thereafter and he can pray for reinstatement. Besides, he cannot claim for recruitment in the employment of the 1st Party . So all this reveals that , 2nd Party fails to establish his clairn, demand and his prayer prayed in the Claim Statement . So I answer this issue in the negative.

P. O. Buxi Bazar Cuttack. ... 2nd Party-Union

Appearances:

(10) In view of the discussions above I conclude that, reference deserves to be rejected . Hence , the order :

Shri B. N. Dwivedy, Forthe 1st Party ORDER

Officer

Management

Reference is rejected

Forthe 2nd Party

Shri Ş . K. Pradhan ,

with no order as to its costs .

Vice President

Union

AtMumbai

A. A. LAD, Presiding Officer

Dated this 2nd November, 2007

नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर , 2007

This reference of the Ministry of Labour , Govern- ment of India vide its letter No. L- 12011 /48/2003 IR (B- I) , dated20-3-2004 for adjudication of different disputes raised by the 2nd Party Union in its charter of demands is as follows:-

का.आ. 3588.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार कलिंगा ग्राम्य बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 22/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12011/48/2003- आई. आर. (बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

"Whether the action of the management of Cuttack GramyaBank in relation to their Head Office at Cuttack and its branches in not conceding the genuine demands of the Union through bipartite or tripartite discussion on the 17- Points of Charter of demand as enclosed in Annexure- A and on the other hand harassing and victimizing the workmen and this way encouraging unfair labour practice in the Establishment is legal and justified? If not, what relief the workmen are entitled to ? " 、

New Delhi , the 29th November , 2007

Charter of Demands

1. Immediate withdrawal of Transfer Policy for the employees of the Bank.

S.O. 3588.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 22/2004 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court , Bhubaneswar , as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the managementment of Kalinga GramyaBank , and their workman , received by the Central Government on 29-11-2007.

[No. L- 12011/48/2003 - IR(B- 1 ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

It has been come to knowledge of the employees that Transfer policy of the organization has been introduced unilaterally with purpose to harass the employees. As per understanding precedent and practice , the policy decision ofthe bank so far as conditions of service of the employees are concerned, should be decided with due consultation withthe recognize union , but without doing so , the transfer policy has been introduced which is against the interest of the employees , hence the said policy should be withdraw immediately.

2. Immediatewithdrawal of Transfer Orders of Office bearers and active members of the Unions .

CENTRAL, GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR

PRESENT

Shri N. K. R. Mohapatra, Presiding Officer C. G. LT. -cum-Labour Court,

Bhubaneswar

Itislearnt that transfer orders have been made to the following. office bearers and active members of the Union with malafide intension to victimize them by introducing the Transfer Policy going against the direction of the Hon'ble Court . Hence such orders of transfer amount punishment and act of unfair labour practice . Therefore such orders of transfer should be cancelled forthwith .

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 22/2004 Date ofPassing Award-6th November, 2007 10026

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1, 1929

1. Shri S. K. Pradhan , Vice President .

2. Shri P. K. Nayak, General Secretary.

3. Shri K. C. Das , Vice president .

4. Shri B. K. Sahoo , Organizing Secretry.

5. Shri Babu Khan , Active Member .

6. Shri I. P. Nanda , Active Member.

3. Restoration of Special Computerization increment and timely payment of annual increment .

The employees of the bank were getting special computer increment which has been subsequently stopped without assigning any reason . Besides the above , the employees are not getting the annual increment on the date of their entitlement . On further enquiry it is ascertained thatillegal deductions from salary has been made from the employees without affording opportunity for such deductions,Hence it is demanded that restoration of special computerization increment should be made and annual increment should be available to the employees on the date of their entitlement and no recovery should be made from the salary of the employees . The recovery which has already been made should be available forthwith .

4. Illegal interference in union affairs .

We strongly condemn the criminal activities of the management for locking the union office and destruction in official records with malafide intention to cripple the union activities . Hence , we demand to allow the Union to function at its office peacefully .

5. Notification of duty chart .

All the employees should be well informed about his duties and responsibilities by notifying the duties and responsibility . Different works are being entrusted intentionally to victimize the concerned employees . So notification should be made indicating clearly the duties and responsibility of each employee , for smooth functioning of the bank .

6. Uriconditional withdrawals of charge sheets .

It has been brought to notice that charge sheets have been issued to the employees those who are also office bearers and active members of the sangha with malafide intention to victimize them . Hence such charge sheets should be withdrawn immediately.

7. Immediate implementation of residual benefits .

In principle it was agreed that the residual benefits i.e. payment of T.A. & D.A, enhanced house building loans , enhanced medical allowances and expenses , and etc. which are given by all scheduled commercial banks to it's employees should be made available as per the direction of Government of India and Ministry of Finance to the employees of the bank .

8. Promotion

The higher posts should be filled up quickly by way of promotion from the post of Messenger- cum-Sweeper

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] (Group -C)to Cashier -cum -Clerk (Group-B) and Cashier-cum- Clerk (Group -B) to Officer (Group - A) as per the seniority.

9. Sanction of leave and release of salary .

The following employees those who are also office bearers /activities of the Union/Sangha have been victimized as their leave has not yet been sanctioned and their salary has not yet been released . Therefore , it is demanded that their leave should be sanctioned immediately and their salary should be released forthwith.

(a) S.K. Pradhan-C.C.-Vice President.

(b) P.K. Nayak-C.C.-General Secretary .

(d) B. Khan-Mes . Activist .

(e) Others office bearers /activists .

10. Immediate sanction ofArrear Diem.

The employees are very often being directed to clear arrearbalancing at their previous branches where they were working previously for the interest of the bank but no payment of Diem to such employees is being made though considerable time have been lapsed . Hence the arrear diem should be made available immediately and henceforth , the advance diem should be paid to meet their day to day expenses. If the employees will be directed to do so .

11. Personal case of Smt . Radha Nair , Steno .

Mrs. Radha Nair , Steno to Chairman has been transferred to other departments by violating the terms of employment and conditions of service . Hence her service should be restored in the original place of posting as per the conditions of appointment .

12.Prevention of sexual harassment to the lady employees .

We strongly condemn the sexual harassment to the lady employees with demand that an independent enquiry should be conducted and the management may be refrained for such activities .

13.Opening of vigilance cell .

Vigilance cell should be opened with one of the representatives of the employees to investigate and prevent corruption committed by the high officials of the Management .

14. Formation of grievance cell and works committee.

The grievance cell and works committee should be formed for quick settlement of the grievance of the employees.

15. Immediate formation of grievance cell for customers .

The grievance cell for the customers should be formed to sort out the problems of the customers . Ajoint coordination committee should be formed to improve the financial conditions of the bank .

16. The following facilities should be extended to the office bearers of the Union .

[ भाग II-- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

(a) All the office bearers should be allowed to avail 30 days special leave in a year for the purpose ofunion work.

(b) The office bearers of the union should not be transferred and deputed during their tenure other than the Head & Branch office of the union .

(c) TADA should be allowed to the office bearers ofthe Union when they are on tour to any branch ofthe bank for the betterment of the organization .

(d) The representative of the union/ employees should be appointed as one of the directors of the board of the bank as per the practice and precedent prevailing in other scheduled commercial banks .

17. Extension of lease deed accommodation.

Some of the staff members of the bank are getting lease deed accommodation facility by discriminating the employees . Hence the lease deed accommodation facility should be extended to all the employees to avoid discrimination .

ORDER/ AWARD

2. Challenging the admissibility and virus of the above reference the Management at the beginning stage of the enquiry submitted with special reference to Section - 10(1 ) read with Section 2(K) of the Industrial Disputes Act, that the present reference in its above form is not maintainable under law in as much as the Central Government have trans graced its limit in making such a reference. On the above submission the representative of the Union was also heard .

3. For better appreciation of the submission made by the parties it is relevant to quote as follows the relevant portion of Section 10( 1 ) of the Industrial Disputes Act under which the present reference has been received .

Section 10 ( 1 )-Where the appropriate Government is of the opinion that any " Industrial Disputes " exists or is apprehended, it may at any time , by order in writing:-

XXX

XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX

(b) refer any matter appearing to be connected with or relevant to the dispute to a Court for enquiry; or

(c) refer the dispute or any matter appearing to be connected with, or relevant to the dispute , if it relates to any matter specified in the Second Schedule , to a Labour Court for adjudication ; or

(d) refer the dispute or any matter appearing tobe connected with, or relevant to, the dispute, whether it relates to any matter specified in the Second Schedule or the Third Schedule, to a Tribunal for adjudication;

XXX XXX jxx XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX

10027

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष, 1 , 1929

4. From the above definition of Section 10( 1 ) it is clear that the Government after being satisfied about the existence of an " Industrial Dispute " or having apprehended any such " Industrial Dispute " is to make a reference to the Tribunal for its adjudication along with "matters" appearing to be connected with such " Industrial Dispute" .

The word " Industrial Dispute " has been defined under Section 2(k) of the Act as follows :-

Section 2( K) : " Industrial Dispute " means any dispute or difference between employers and employers , or between employers and workmen , or between workmen and workmen , which is connected with the employment or non - employment or the terms of employment or with the conditions of labour , of any person;

5. From the reading of the above Sections, it is clear that an " Industrial Dispute " as defined under Section 2(K) of the Act is only entertainable by a Tribunal . According to the said definition it is only that , " dispute or difference" between ' employers and employers " or between "employers and workmen " or between " workmen and workmen " which is connected with the employment or non - employment or the terms of employment or with the conditions of labour of any person which would fall within the ambit of the definition of Industrial Disputes are alone to be adjudicated by the Tribunal . In other words a dispute or difference must relates to either the employment or non- employment or terms of employment or the conditions of labour of any person so as to call it an " Industrial Disputes . " Unless a dispute is connected with these matters itwill not satisfy the requirements of law and will not fall withinthe ambit of an Industrial Disputes . The phrase" any matter " as used in Section -10 of the I.D. Act therefore refers to those of the matters which have " direct nexus " with an " Industrial Dispute" : From the reading of various charter of demands as mentioned earlier it can be gathered that none of these demands fall within the definition of the term " Industrial Disputes " . Even otherwise they are so unrelated with the other that they cannot be treated as matters connected with or relevant to any dispute . It has been held in the case between workmen of Hercules Insurance Co. Ltd. , Versus- Hercules Insurance Co. Limited reported in 1961 - I - LLJ - 249 SC that where the reference is inconsistent with statutory provisions, it would be invalid. Similarly while speaking about the jurisdiction of the adjudicatory authorities mader the Act it has further beenheld in different judicial pronouncement that the word "Jurisdiction" means authority to decide. It is further held that the powers conferred upon the Tribunal have the sancţion of law behind it and are not exercisable by reason ofdiscretion vested in it . Therefore , when from the earlier discussion it is clear that none of the demands of the Union which forms part of the reference is an " Industrial Disputes" within the definition of the term and as none of these demands are matters connected with the other to 10028

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1,1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] form a composite " Industrial Dispute " it is held that this Tribunal lacks the jurisdiction to adjudicate the same and accordingly the reference is held to be not maintainable under the four corners of Section 10( 1) read with Section 2(K) oftheAct.

ANNEXURE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR PRESENT : Shri N. K. R. Mohapatra , Presiding Officer C. G. L. T. - cum -Labour-Court, Bhubaneswar

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO . 57/2004 Date of Passing Award- 29th October , 2007 BETWEEN:

The Management of the Chairman, Baitarani Gramya Bank , Head Office, Baripada , Dist.Mayurbhanj , Orissa-757001.

1stPartyManagement .

(and)

6. It was of course argued by the Union with reference to item - 6 of the Second Schedule and Item - 11 of the Third Schedule of that Act that matters not amounting to " Industrial Disputes " can also be referred by the Government for adjudication and therefore the adjudication of the different demands of the Union as extracted earlier are within the competency of the Tribunal . But it may be mentioned here that the narration " all matters other than those specified in the third schedule " as appearing against item-6 of the 2nd schedule and the narration " Any other matter that may be prescribed" as appearing against item 11 of 3rd the schedule squarely meansto those of the matters which constitute an " Industrial Dispute " but not otherwise . Therefore , I find no force in the submission of the Union.

... 2nd Party-workman.

For the 1st Party

Management

7. Hence, in the result the reference is held to be not maintainable in as much as the Tribunal lacks the jurisdiction to adjudicate the same .

For the 2nd Party

Their Workmen , Thri Bishnu Charan Panda , At. Parade Padia , WardNo. 10, Baripada, Dist. Mayurbhanj , Orissa -757001 APPEARANCES : M/ s . Karunakar Jena Advocate . M/ s . Satyabadi Das , Advocate .

Workman .

8.Accordinglythe reference is answered in the form of an " Award " .

AWARD

N. K. R. MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर , 2007

TheGovernment of India , in the Ministry of Labour , inexercise of Powers conferred by Clause (d) of Sub- sec- tion ( 1) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Indus- trial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) have referred the fol- lowing dispute for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 12012/ 110/2004- IR (B - 1 ) , dated 20-8-2004 :-

का.आ. 3589.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बाईतरानी ग्राम्य बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 57/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the action of the Management of Baitarani Gramya Bank having its Head Office at Baripada in dismissing Sh. Bishnu Charan Panda from services with effect from 21-4-2001 without providing due opportunity and observing the principles of natural justice is legal and justified? If not , what relief the workman is entitled to ? " [सं. एल-12012/110/2004- आई. आर. ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 29th November , 2007

S.O. 3589. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 57/2004 )ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court , Bhubaneswar , as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Baitarani Gramya Bank, and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 29-11-2007 .

[No. L- 12012/110/2004 -IR (B - 1 ) ]

2.The workman Bishnu Ch . Panda was appointed by theManagement- Bank as a Clerk-cum-Cashier on 6-8-1981. While he was working as such in Morada Branch he was charge-sheeted on 11-3-2000 vide Letter No. 1048 of the Management for misappropriation of funds and tampering ofrecords pertaining to the accounts of various customers during 1998 to 1999. During preliminary enquiry it was further found that while working as Clerk -cum- Cashier in another branch at Kuchei he had also misappropriated cash by tampering and manipulating the official records of various customers during his tenure from 1994 to 1998 . Therefore , he was further charge - sheeted vide Letter No. 73 , dated 3-6-2000 and Letter No. 1051 , dated 8-12- 2000 under the signature of the Chairman-cum-Disciplinary Authority. Pending enquiry the workman was placed under AJAY KUMAR , Desk Officer [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii)]

10029

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

challenge the same being in accordance with the provisions of the Employees Service Regulations.

5. On the basis of the above pleadings of the parties the following issues were framed.

ISSUES

1. Whether the reference is maintainable ?

2. Whether the enquiry conducted by the Management was fair and proper ?

3. Whether the order of dismissal from service was legal and justified?

4. Ifnot, what relief the workman is entitled to ?

FINDINGS

PRELIMINARY ISSUE No.2

suspension and one Shri Prafulla KumarMohapatra, Senior Manager (Credit ) was appointed as Enquiry Officer vide order dated 14-3-2001 and one Shri Dibakar Moharana was appointed as Presenting Officer same day in respect of all the three charge-sheets issued to the workman . After necessary notice to the workman , the Enquiry Officer took up the enquiry on 4-4-2001 . The delinquent -workman attended the same and admitted all the charges as he had confessed in his replies to the charge - sheets . The Enquiry Officer therefore submitted his report on 16-4-2001 where- upon the Disciplinary Authority in his letter dated 21-4--2001 dismissed the workman from service without notice . The workman in consequence preferred an appeal before the competent authority but it was of no consequence . Hence he raised an Industrial Disputes culminating the same in the present reference .

3. Challenging the above action of the Management as illegal and devoid of the principles of natural justice it is alleged by the workman in his claim statement that he had never admitted the charges before the Enquiry or at any time before .He being an orthopedically handicapped person his signature was simply obtained by the Management in different papers and it were subsequently utilized against him to show that he had admitted all the charges . During enquiry he was not supplied with necessary documents which were the basis of charges nor he was allowed to defend himself as per the Standing Orders nor the Enquiry Officer had conducted the enquiry as per rules , nor he was supplied with the enquiry report or any letter of proposed punishment nor he was given any chance of personal hearing by the Disciplinary Authority before passing the dismissal order . It is further alleged by the workman that when he asked for relevant papers such as the preliminary enquiry report , the report of the Enquiry Officer and other base level documents for the purpose of filing appeal , he was denied of the preliminary report and few other documents . On preferring appeal , the Appellate Authority also did not act fairly in as much as he was not called upon for personal hearing etc. It is also alleged that the Chairman of the Bank was not competent to issue the orders of dismissal and as such the entire proceeding is vitiated for non-observance of the principles of natural justice .

4. The Management on the other hand contended that the enquiry was conducted in a most perfect manner in accordance with the Service Regulations and that the various allegations of the workman are untenable and unworthy of consideration . The Chairman of the bankbeing the Disciplinary Authority in respect of the delinquent- workman no illegality was committed by him in issuing the orders of dismissal . It is further contended that as the workman admitted all the charges in his show cause reply as also during enquiry there was no scope for the Enquiry Officer either to record his evidence separately or of the Management Witness and therefore the action of the Management and the Appellate Authority is not open to 6. This issue has been taken up at the first instance as preliminary issue on the prayer of the parties .

On this issue the Management has examined the Enquiry Officer and the Presenting Officer as M. W. 1 and 2 respectively besides producing several documents including the enquiry proceedings file . The workman on the other hand adduced no evidence despite being provided with several opportunities. After closure of the . evidence of the Management the workman except taking time did not come ultimately to adduce evidence for which his case was closed . However , he advanced necessary argument limiting it to the evidence elicited from the Management Witness and the documents produced by the Management .

7. Before dealing with the factual aspects , I would like tomake it clear at the first instance for better appreciation of the case that the delinquent was charge- sheeted under the Staff Service Regulations 1980 while the entire domestic enquiry was conducted under the revised Regulations styled as " Officers and Employees Service Regulations 2001 (Revised). The revised Regulations is found to have been passed with a saving clause in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 30 of the Regional Rural Banks Act 1976 (21 of 1976) by the Board of Directors of the Management in consultation with its sponsored Bank (Bank of India) and the National Bank of Agriculture and Rural Development and with the previous sanction of the Central Government . The various guidelines provided by the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development for the procedure to be adopted for Disciplinary Action in Regional Rural Banks, hereinafter referred as " guideline" has been referred and filed by the Management as part of the Regulations being followed by all Gramya Banks (RRBs) including the Management Bank.

8. Admittedly all the three charge-shects were duly servedto the workman. Evidently these charge -sheets were issued without any documents on the basis of which charges were framed. There is also no mention that the workman was offered to take the assistance of any of his co -worker to defend himself in the enquiry proceeding .

10030

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] The Service Regulations both earlier and the amended are also silent wherever mentioning of such fact or supply of documents should form part of the charge- sheet . Rather the guidelines prescribes that it is not necessary to supply copies of documents or preliminary report or statement along with the charge- sheet but it should be supplied on request being made by the charge - sheeted employee . Similarly in regard to the engagement of defence representative the guideline prescribes that it is for the delinquent to write to the disciplinary authority or the Enquiry Officer proposing such representative as his nominee . Since the workman is found to have not availed of the above procedure by writing separately or in any of his three show causes which he had filed much before the commencement of enquiry, it can not be said that the enquiry was not conducted in accordance with the principles of natural justice .

sacred principles of natural justice. The three replies (Ext.- 8, 9 and 10) given by the workman in response to charge- sheets show that by narrating his personal problems the workman having admitted all the charges had prayed for the mercyof the Management . The enquiry file also shows that when the Enquiry Officer questioned the workman on the various charges by reading out the same to him the delinquent-workman had agreed to all these charges leaving no room for the Enquiry Officer to proceed further to record the evidence of the Management Witness . The evidence adduced by the Presenting Officer also confirms the same. The proceedings dated 4-4-2001 (Ext. - 4) which the enquiry officer has recorded on the date of commencement of enquiry shows that the workman had admitted all the charges saying " I am admitting all the 23 charges of irregularities contained in these charge- sheets framed against me. 1 was under mental tension during that period" . The- said Ext. -4 further shows that the same contains the signature of the workman evidencing the above recording. It also shows that a copy of the above recording was supplied to the workman forthwith and it was received by him with an endorsement and signature. Therefore, 1 find nothing irregular in conducting the enquiry.

9. The other allegations of the workman is that he was not supplied with a copy of the report of the enquiry officer . But since such report is given to the disciplinary. authority either for his acceptance or for non -acceptance , the non- supply of such report either along with the dismissal order or some times earlier to that cannot be viewed otherwise in the absence of any rule to that effect in the Regulations of 2001 , to say that the same has resulted inmis-carriage of natural justice .

10. It is further claimed by the workman that before passing the dismissal orders he was neither issued with any letters about the proposed/supposed punishment nor was he asked for a personal hearing before such punishment could be awarded. This claim of the workman is also found not supported by the Employees Regulations. Rather the Regulation is totally silent about such a concept of giving show cause notice or a prior notice for personal hearing. It is the settled law, that second show cause notice is not necessary after 44 amendment of the Constitution . Secondly there is no rule enjoining the Management to furnish a copy of the enquiry report . Therefore , there appears no force in the above contention of the workman.

11. In. a case reported in LLJ - 1988 Patna 222 it has been held that whether adequate opportunity was given to the workman or not depends upon the facts and circumstances of the case . When a charge memo was served upon the workman and he was asked to give his explanation and he actually availed of the opportunity and whenthe explanation amounts to admission of the charges , there is no obligation on the part of the Management to lead evidence in support of the charges . It has further been held that if the totality of the charges satisfies the court that the partyvisited with the adverse order has not suffered fromdenial of the reasonable opportunity, the court should decline tobe punctilious or fanatical as if the rules of natural justice were sacred scriptures .

13. No doubt it is alleged in the claim statement by the Workman that he had neither given any show cause replies (Ext . -8 , 9 and 10) admitting the charges nor had he confessed the charges before the enquiry officer . It is alleged that his signature was taken in different blank papers and it were utilized subsequently to manufacture Ext. -8, 9 and 10 as also the recordings of the enquiry officer marked as Ext. -4 . But such of the plea of the workman does not inspire any confidence in as much as the same appears to have been cooked up at a belated stage for the purpose ofthis case . Ext . - 13 to 13/6 are the correspondences which the workman had with his disciplinary authority after being dismissed from service . But none of these documents whisper a word supporting his above stand. Ext. - 13/10 is his another letter which he had sent to Shri Ananta Chandra Sahu , General Manager - cum- Chairman (Acting) accusing him of taking his signature in several blank papers . But contraryto the same the enquiry officer (M. W. - 1) has been confronted with a suggestion that he had taken the workman's signature on a blank paper and it was subsequently used as his explanation (Ext . - 9) . Except this neither MW.- 1 nor MW. - 2 have been questioned about histwo other explanations marked as Ext. - 8 and 10. Similarly though according to the letter (Ext.- 13/10) of the workman Shri Ananta Chanrda Sahu, the acting Chairman lad taken his signature on various blank papers , the Presenting OfficerM.W. - 2) has been blamed by way of suggestion during trial that he had taken the signature of the workman on a pre -written papers and used it in the enquiry proceedingto show that he had admitted the charges before either enquiry officer . In view of the above varied stand of the workman it can not be believed that he had not admitted 12. From the totality of the discussions made in the foregoing paras it is clear that there was no violation ofthe [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

to the chargesther in the show cause or before the enquiry officer and that these douments Ext. -8, 9, 10 and 4 are all stage -managed documents. Even otherwise a close scrutiny ofthese documents discloses that the same could not have been manufactured by the Management .

14. The confession recorded by the Enquiry Officer has no doubt not been recorded item-wise . But the evidence of the Presenting Officer shows that after the various charges were read out to the workman he had admittedto the same for which the enquiry officer had to record the same in the following words.

Q. -Whether you have gone through all the charges contained therein and understood them?

A.-Yes , I have read the charges contained in these charge- sheets and understood them.

Q.-Whether you are admitting all the charges (23) Nos.) framed against you?

A. Yes, I am admitting all the 23 (Twenty Three) charges of irregularities contained in these charge-sheets framed against me . I was under mental tension during that period .

15. The show cause submitted by the workman in reply to the charge-sheet vide Ext. -8, 9 and 10 are found containing his voluntary admission to the charges with almost similar explanation and therefore , I find that the admission so made was voluntary .

16. It is true that after recording the admission in the above manner the enquiry officer had not recorded the statement of the Management Witness . But as held in the case reported in LLJ - 1988- Patna -2J -1988 - Patna - 222 (Supra), recording of evidence of the Management Witness after the admission oftheworkman is not warranted at all , especially when the Employees Regulations of 2001 by which the workman is guided is silent about such a procedure. Thus in conclusion it is held that there was no infirmity or violation of the principles of natural justice on the part of the enquiry officer and as such the enquiry is held to have been done in accordance with law and the procedures framed there under.

17.Accordingly this issue is answered in favour of the Management and against the workman.

ISSUE No. 1 , 3 & 4

18. It is the settled law that under Section 11 -A of the Act once the domestic enquiry is held to be good the court is to proceed with the materials on record to find out whether the punishment given was proper or not. Therefore , when in the instance case the fairness of the domestic enquiry has already been decided while dealing with preliminary Issue No.2 holding the same to be proper , it is needless to ask the parties to adduce further evidence on Issue No.3 and 4 as the same can be decided independent of the same with the materials available on records as per Section 11 -A 4935 G1/07-30

10031

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

of the Act. However as regards maintainability of the reference (Issue No.1 ) , the status of the workman and of the Management having not been sincerely questioned by the Management and the said issue having been framed basing on a formal objection of the Management, the said issue is answered affirmatively .

19. Now coming to the question of quantum of punishment as given by the Management, it would be proper to repeat here that , the charge-sheets and the report of the enquiry officer as also the evidence adduced by the Management show that on several occasions the workman having resorted to similar kind of irregularities has misappropriated huge sum of money belonging to different customers while working in two different stations during 1994 to 1998. Considering the same I find that the punishment of dismissal as given by the Management under the signature of the Chairman of the Bank is just, proper and above board and as such the workman is not entitled foranyrelief.

20. Reference is answered accordingly .

N. K. R. MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer LIST OF WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF THE 2nd PARTY-WORKMAN.

No witnesses examined on behalf of the 2nd Party- Workman.

LISTOF DOCUMENTS EXHIBITED ON BEHALF OF THE 2nd PARY-WORKMAN.

Nodocuments also exhibited on behalf of the 2nd Party- Workman.

LIST OF WITNESSES ON BEHALF OF THE 1ST PARTY- MANAGEMENT

M.W. No.1 Shri Prafulla Kumar Mohapatra

M.W. No. 2-Shri Dibakar Maharana .

LIST OF DOCUMENTS EXHIBITED ON BEHALF OF THE 1ST PARTY-MANAGEMENT

Ext.-1- Order dated 14-3-2001 of Chairman & DisciplínaryAuthority , Baitarani Gramya Bank, Baripada appointing Enquiry Officer .

Ext -2- Order dated 14-3-2001 of Chairman & Disciplinary Authority, Baitarani Gramya Bank, Baripada appointing Presenting Officer .

Letter of notice dated 24-3-2001 issued to the workman by the Enquiry Officer Shri Prafulla Kumar Mohapatra . Ext.-3-

Ext.-4- Enquiry Proceeding on the Departmental Enquiry against Shri Bishnu Charan Panda.

Ext.-5- Charge Sheet dated 11-3-2000.

Ext.-6- Supplementary charge sheet dated 3-6-2000 .

Ext.-7- Supplementary charge sheet dated 8-12-2000.

10032

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

Ext.-8- Show- cause reply dated 1-5-2000 of the workman to the Chairman and competent authority.

Ext.-9- Show cause reply dated 19-7-2000 of workman to the Chairman & Competent Authority.

Ext. -10- Show cause reply dated 13-1-2001 of workman to the Chairman and Competent Authority.

Ext. - 11-Findings of the Enquiry on the Departmental enquiry on the allegations made against Shri B.C. Panda .

Bxt-12- Final order dated 21-4-2001 of the Chairman & Disciplinary Authority dismissing the workman from service.

Ext.-13 Letter dated 11-6-2001 of the workman Ext-13/1 to 13/10 - Letters dated 25-6-2001, 17-7-2001,10-9-2001,28-8-2001, 10-10-2001 , 21-11-2001,4-3-2002, 5-4-2002, 17-7-2002 and 17-7-2001 of the workman .

Ext -14 Reply letter of the Management dated 10-7-2001.

Ext. -14/1 to 14/8 - Reply letters of the Management dated 10-7-2001, 27-7-2001, 28-8-2001 , 3-10-2001 , 18-2-2002, 5-3-2002, 4-6-2002 , 30-11-2002, 13-12-2002.

Ext. - 14/9 Minutes of Agenda Item No. 9 of Board Meeting held on 21-4-2003 ( 140th) Ext. - 15- Letter dated 14-3-2001 addressed to the Enquiring Officer by the Chairman , Baitarani Gramya Bank, Baripada.

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर , 2007 का.आ. 3590.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार ओरिएण्टल बैंक ऑफ कामर्स के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या66/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकारको29-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -12012/25/2006- आई. आर. ( बी. II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 29th November , 2007 S.O. 3590.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 66/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , No. II , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Oriental Bank ofCommerce and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 29-11-2007 .

[No. L- 12012/25/2006- IR (B -II) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- II, NEW DELHI Presiding Officer : R. N. RAI

ID . No. 66/2006

IN THE MATTER OF :

Shri Anil Kumar Gupta , S/ o Shri S. P. Gupta , R/o109, Krishna Gali , Paharganj , Delhi - 55 .

VERSUS

M/ s . Oriental Bank of Commerce ,

H.O .: Harsha Bhawan ,

"E" Block, Cannought Place ,

NewDelhi -110001 .

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 12012/25/ 2006 (IR(B - II) Central Government dated 20-7-2006 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The point runs as hereunder :-

"Whether the action of the management of Oriental Bank ofCommerce in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service on Shri Anil Kumar Gupta w.e.f. 23-9-2003 is just, fair and legal ? Whether the non - payment of due subsistence allowance is just , fair and legal ? If not , to what relief the workman concerned is entitled and from which date . ?"

The workman applicant has filed claim statement. In the claim statement it has been stated that the workman has been employed as Cashier -cum-Clerk with erstwhile M/ s . Punjab Co - operative Bank Limited since 1983 and after the merger of the bank with M/ s . Oriental Bank of Commerce w.e.f. 1997, the workman became the employee ofM/s .Oriental Bank of Commerce and continued working therein in the Clercial capacity till the date of his illegal dismissalw.e.f. 23-9-2003 .

Thatthe service record of the workman was neat and cleanand during his entire service tenure earlier with M/s . Punjab Co -operative Bank Limited and subsequently with M/s. Oriental Bank of Commerce , the workman never gave any chance of complaint to either of the managements and workedwith utmost sincereity and devotion .

That however the workman had been issued a false and fabricated charge-sheet dated 5-1-1998 for certain misconduct under BPS dated 19-10-1966 whereby the management leveled false , baseless and vague allegations against him with respect to the period as far back as 1990 onwards and he was placed under suspension with immediate effect .

That the workman submitted his detailed explanation dated 7-2-1998 refuting all the charges of misconduct and objected to the issuance of such a vague chargesheet. In 10033 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

any case , the said charge sheet is highly belated , after thought and without jurisdiction and not sustainable / maintainable .

That the Hon'ble Court cannot act as an Appellate Authority over the findings of the Inquiry Officer . The commensurality of the punishment inflicted upon the delinquent employee by the competent authority is outside the purview of the ID Act.

That the issue of non-payment of wages during the period November, 1994 to November , 1997 is hopelessly time barred. The workman is estopped from raising the issues now, being highly belated and extraneious to the terms of reference. In any case , for the period November, 1994 to November, 1997 , he did not perform his duties, thus, was not entitled to wages for the said period on the principles of " No work no Pay" .

That the charges have been alleged to have peen committed by the workman on or about the year 1990, whereas the chargesheet had been issued to the workman in the year 1998 i.e. after a lapse of 8 years . The charge- sheet of the managernent is , therefore , barred by limitation and is not based on equality and principles of natural justice. Serious prejudice has been caused to the workman in defending the charges due to lapse of long period of time i. e. 8 years . Even otherwise , there was no jurisdiction and authority vested with the disciplinary authority after a lapse of reasonable time in issuing the chargesheet , whereas in the present case the delay is of 8 years in issuing the chargesheet, which delay is fatal and the chargesheet is thus bad in law.

That the punishment of dismissal imposed upon the workman was legal, justified and commensurating to the gravityofcharges upheld against him . In case, if the inquiry is held to be defective or vitiated on any ground , the management be given an opportunity to prove the charges inthe court.

That allegation of bias , if any, has to be raised by the workman at the first possible instance .Having participated in the inquiry without raising even his little finger ousts the element of bias against the management .

The said chargesheet is even otherwise not sustainable in respect of alleged charges pertaining to Jayant Fabricators and Khandelwal Textiles . The management had already recovered the amounts due in respect of the said accounts from other officials of the erstwhile management namely Shri I. N. Garg and Shri S.P. Bakshi . The management to protect the said officials foisted a false chargesheet against the workman which is not only highly belated, after thought and without jurisdiction .

It is pertinent to mention here that the chargesheet was issued with a pre -determined and pre -conceived mind as regarding some of the charges the management had already recovered some amounts without the consent of the workman with the allegations that he was guilty as such , the workman could not have been chargsheeted again onthe same charges .

That the act of the management in dismissing the workman from the service of the bank is illegal, unjustified and colourable exercise of power. Not only the charges levelled against the workman were vague , but the inquiry conducted by the management was an empty formality conducted with a view to dispense with the services of the workman who was otherwise having an unblemished service record . As such , the dismissal order dated 23-9-2003 and the order of the Appellate Authority dated 08-7-2004 are not tenable in the eyes of law and besides non -payment of due subsistence allowance of 100 % wages after one year of suspension, is also not just , fair arıd legal .

That admittedly the workman indulged in unauthorized activities of opening and closing different accounts during the period enunciated in the chargesheet , withdrawing amounts from the accounts of different customers, impersonating them, blatantly violating bank norms which is not befitting of an employee of his stature . He was an employee of the respondent bank expected to act strictly within the ambit of powers vested with him. The workman was charged under the BPS by which his services were governed . The inquiry was held in consonance with the principles of natural justice wherein full opportunity was granted to him to put up his defence . His comments on the inquiry report were duly considered and after due application of mind, he was imposed the punishment of "Dismissal without notice from the services of the Bank" . Hisappeal was duly considered and after due applicability of mind , it was dismissed . Admittedly his proved misconduct exposed the bank to peril and caused pecuniary loss to the bank. Financial irregularities by employees in a Banking Institution which stands on the grand norm of public faith, is a serious offence , required to be dealt with a heavy hand.

Recovery in the present case was an administrative process to align the account which had gone bad . Charge sheet was issued to him for misconducts committed by him. The two are independent processes which depend on different causes of action.

Heard argument from both the sides on the point of quantum of punishment.

It was submitted from the side of the workman that all the money unauthorisedly drawan by him has been The manageinent has filed written statement . In the written statement it has been stated that the departmental inquiry was conducted in consonance with the principles of natural justice and as per the rules applicable in the respondent bank, whrein full opportunity was granted to the workman to put up his defence . The evidence adduced in the inquiry by the parties was evaluated by the Disciplinary and Appellate Authority judiciously. The adequacy of the evidence cannot be looked upon in the departmental inquiry .

10034

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

Court cannot substitute penalty imposed by the employer in such cases .

In case of proved misappropriation there is no question of considering past record. It is discretion of the employer to consider the same in appropriate cases , but the Labour Court cannot substitute the penalty imposed by the employer in such cases .

recovered. The bank recovered an amount of Rs . 1,000 said to be drawn fraudulently by the workman in 1996. An amount of Rs . 1 , 000 was recovered from the workman in regard to fraudulently entry in account No.3 . Thus , the workmandeposited the amount of Rs. 3, 800 on 30-10-1996. In 1997 an amount of Rs.11 , 200 was recovered from the workman. It was submitted that the management cannot recover the amount and punish him by way of dismissal .

The bank has realized the money which has been withdrawn fraudulently. The bank is at liberty to recover the money fraudulently drawn by a workman . The management can further hold inquiry and punish the workman, so there is no jeopardy in inflicting the punishments on the workman .

Itwas submitted from the side of the bank that the Tribunal decided the preliminary issue regarding the fairness of the inquiry by order dated 17-9-2007 and the inquiry has been found valid .

It is necessary to mention here that while deciding the fairness of the inquiry, I have dealt with the issues of subsistence allowance and the prejudice caused to the workman. All the points have been discussed and decided regarding fairness of the inquiry. The workman was not paid full wages as he himself lingered the proceedings . These points need not be reiterated again . The workman has made several fraudulent entries and he has withdrawn fraudulently several amounts on several dates from several accounts . Such misconduct exposes the bank to pril and causes pecuniary loss to the bank. The bank is a financial institution . The financial irregularities are serious misconduct by the employees of a bank and the management has rightly dealt him with a heavy hand .

The fairness of the inquiry has been decided as stated by the management as issue No. 1 , that decision will form partiof the award .

In the facts and circumstances of the case the punishment inflicted on the claimant is neither excessive nor dis -proportionate . The claimant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for .

The reference is replied thus

It was submitted from the side of the workman that the punishment is excessive . Seven charges have been framed against the workman and all the charges relate to fraudulently withdrawal of the money from different accounts . In such circumstances the workman has illegally withdrawn the amounts during his employment . The management has framed seven charges and all the charges have been found proved by the Inquiry Officer and the inquiry has been held fair .

The action of the management of Oriental Bank of Commerce in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service of Shri Anil Kumar Gupta w.e.f. 23-9-2003 is just, fair and legal . The non - payment of due subsistence allowance isjust , fair and legal . The workman -applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for .

The award is given accordingly.

Date: 22-11-2007.

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर , 2007

It was further submitted from the side of the bank that the workman has not only misappropriated the money deposited by the customer but also by his acts damaged the fair image of the bank besides exposing the bank's fundis to financial risk and loss . The acts of the workman are highly detrimental to the image , reputation and standing of the bank and it amounts to moral turpitude as such the bank has lost faith and confidence in his integrity, devotion toduty and his honesty, and he has become undependable and reliable for the bank therefore , cannot be continued in the service of the bank .

का.आ. 3591.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन ओवरसीज बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 54/1988 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को28-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/211 / 1988 -डी- II ( ए) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 29th November , 2007 My attention was drawn to 2000 LLK 1271. It has been stated that Section 11 A-Powers of Labour Court of Tribunal to give appropriate relief in case of dismissal or discharge of workmen- Disciplinary action-Quantum of punishment-Discretion of Labour Court-Labour Court giving specific finding that charge of misappropriation and breach of trust established-It , however , setting aside dismissal order and ordering reinstatement with 25 % back wages while imposing penalty of stoppage of 5 increments with cumulative effect--Unsustainable- Once act of misappropriation is proved, may be for a small or a large amount , there is no question of showing uncalled for sympathy and reinstating employee in service-Labour

S.O. 3591.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 54/1988) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court,Bangalore as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial 10035 [भाम II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1, 1929

dispute between the employers in relation to the manage- ment of Indian Overseas Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 28-11-2007.

[No. L-12012/211 /88-D- II (A)]

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

Dated: 8th November , 2007

PRESENT

SHRIA . R. SIDDIQUI, PresidingOfficer

C. R. No. 54/1988

IPARTY

II PARTY

Shri N R Dhananjayan, The Chairman &

Sri Sai Nivas, 9th Cross , 5th Main , Gangenahalli, Banglore-32

ManagingDirector Indian Overseas Bank, Post Box .No.3765, No.762, Anna Salai , Chennai -02

AWARD

1- The Central Government by exercising the powers conferredby clause (d) of sub- section 2A of the Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L- 12012/211 /88 - D- II (A) dated 14th September 1988 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

sincerely and legally to the satisfaction of his superiors. But he was dismissed from service as per letter dated 8-12-1986 in pursuance of charge sheet dated 16-11-1985 and additional charge sheet dated 18-1-1986. After the receipt of the charge sheets the first party sent suitable reply and denied the charges and requested the second party to hold an enquiry. Thereafter, the first party was informed by notice of enquiry dated 26-2-1986 about the place and date of enquiry. The enquiry was started on 17-03-1986. The charge sheets issued had not contained the material particulars and the allegations are totally vague. The charge sheets are not accompanied with list of witnesses and list of documents . The enquiry officer did not conduct the enquiry in accordance with law and principles of natural justice . No presenting officer was appointed to conduct the enquiry. Hence the enquiry officer played the role of a prosecutor as well as a Judge which is contrary to the principle of natural justice. The enquiry was not conducted properly and adequate opportunity was denied. The first party was not examined himself as witness but his statement was recorded by the enquiry officer putting number of questions in favour of the management . Then the enquiry officer had given a finding which is totally perverse ; that the dismissal order was not communicated to the first party; that he had preferred an appeal to the Appellate Authority. But without considering the various grounds urged in the appeal, the Appellate Authority had dismissed the appeal ; that the dismissal of the first party by the second party is a clear case of victimisation and unfair labour practice . Therefore , the first party requested this tribunal to set aside the order of dismissal passed against him and to reinstate him in service with all consequential benefits .

"Whether the action of the management of Indian Overseas Bank in dismissing from service Shri NR Dhananjayan is justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled? "

2. The management issued a charge sheet dated. 16-11-1985 against the first party alleging that he committed the misconduct for having misappropriated a sum of Rs.5190 as indicated in Annexure -A and deposited the various items of the amounts paid to him bythe borrowers belatedly as per Annexure -B. The management then issued additional charge sheet dated 18-1-1986 to the effect that in addition to the aforesaid amount of Rs . 5190 the first party also misappropriated a sum of Rs . 500 as shown in Annexure - A.1 and belatedly deposited the various amounts received from the borrowers as per Annexure-B1 . The first party denied those charges paving the way for Domestic Enquiry resulting into the enquiry findings holding him guilty of the charges and then passed the impugned punishment orderdismissing him from service.

3. The case ofthe first party workman , as made out in his Claim Statement, is that he joined the services of the second party management as Godown Keeper with effect form 10-01-1973 . Though he was due for his promotion during December 1985, the promotion order was not issued on the alleged ground that the disciplinary /proceedings were pending against him . The first party was working

4.The management by way of its Counter Statement among other things contended that it had issued two charge sheets dated16-11-1985 and 18-1-1986 against the first party for misappropriation of a total amount of Rs . 5190. The charge sheets were elaborate and annexures were given to the charge sheet enabling the first party to understand the charges . The first party replied to both the charge sheets as per his letter dated 1-2-1986 denying all the charges . Since the explanation submitted by the first party was not satisfactory, the second party had ordered an enquiry into the charges levelled against the first party . One Mr. Madava Raowas duly appointed as Enquiry Officer as per Bipartite Settlement. He has conducted the enquiry in accordance with law and principles of natural justice . Conducting enquiryby an enquiry officer without any presenting officer iswell meritedunder the Bipartite Settlement. The enquiry officer can act as a Prosecutor . The statement of the first party was properly recorded by the enquiry officer . After the proper enquiry, the enquiry officer has given his finding and found the first party guilty of charges . After considering the evidence on record and written summing up given by the defence representatives , the Disciplinary 10036

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1,1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

are to appear without waiting for any notice on 21-3-2006 before the labour court . The labour court isdirected to complete the proceedings within six months in the light of the age of the case without in anyway being influenced by the earlier award/order ofthe learned Single Judge or this order .

Authority had issued show cause notice including the copy of the findings and sought for explanation from the first party regarding the punishment. The first party neither responded to the show cause notice nor appeared for the show cause hearing dated 8-12-1986 even though the said show cause notice was acknowledged by him on 29-11- 1986. Then the Disciplinary Authority had passed an order dated 8-12-1986 confirmed the punishment proposed in the show cause notice and accordingly awarded the punishment of dismissal without any notice. Therefore , the management requested this tribunal to reject the reference .

5. On the basis of the respective contentions of the parties with regard to the validity and fairness or otherwise of the enquiry proceedings , this tribunal on 13-2-1988 framed the following Preliminary issue:

"Whether the Second party proves that the Domestic Enquiry held by it in accordance with law. "

6. During the course of trial of the said issue , the management examined the enquiry officer as MW1 and got marked 19 documents at Ex.Mlto M19 . The first party also examined himself and got marked in all 11 documents at Ex.W1 to W11 . My learned Predecessor after having head the learned counsels for the respective parties by his order dated 19-06-1989 answered the above said preliminary issue in favour of the management holding that the management has conducted the DE in accordance with law. Thereupon this tribunal by award dated 10-10-1997 rejected the reference with a finding that the action of the management bank in dismissing the first party workman from service is justified and that he is not entitled to any relief.

7. Itwould appear from the records that the first Party approached the Hon'ble High Court in WP No. 2781/98 challenging the orders of this Tribunal on DE as well as the award passed against him rejecting the reference . His Lordship of Hon'ble High Court sitting in single bench by order dated03-11-2000 in WP No. 2781/1998 , after having come to the conclusion that the DE which was conducted against the first party was vitiated and modified the award passed by this tribunal granting 3 years salary to the first party and aggrieved by the said order the management as well as the first party preferred appeals No. 3091/2001 and 1884/2001 . Their Lordship of our Hon'ble High Court in Division Bench while allowing the appeal No. 3091/2001 filed by the first party and dismissing the WA No. 1884/ 2001 filed by the management remitted the matter back to this tribunal allowing the second party management to lead evidence on merits . The operative portion of the aforesaid order at para 12 runs as under :

"The order of the learned single judge in so far as vitiation of enquiry is accepted and the order of the learned single judge in so far it relates to granting three years salary is set aside . Matter is remitted back to labour court for redecision on merits . Parties

8. It would appear from the records that aggrieved by the orders of the Hon'ble High court in the aforesaid WritAppeals remanding the matter back to this tribunal for fresh disposal , the management preferred SLP to SC and that cameto be dismissed by order dated 16-04-2007 . Therefore, the matter was taken up for fresh hearing before this tribunal permitting the second party management to lead fresh evidence on merits . The management then adduced the oral evidence of 3 witnesses as MW2to MW4 and in their evidence afresh got marked documents at Ex.M1 to M138 , M139 series and Ex.M140 Series . Statement of MW2 in his examination chief is relevant to the 3rd charge leveled against the first party wherein he stated that after having visited the said Shri Kuri Boraiah on enquiry it was disclosed that the first party has withdrawn a sum of Rs. 2500 from his SB account without his knowledge as per the withdrawal slip at Ex.M.1 and complaints of said Kuri Boraiah to the above effect at Ex . M2 & M4 and the statement of the first party on that is at Ex.M3 . MW3 Shri P. M. Maragal , Branch Manager who was said to be working atKondlahalli Branch as Agricultural Officer between September 1984 to August 1985 is to the effect that during the course of his inspection regarding a small loan application of Smt . Susheelamma , it was found that her husband , G. Thimmappa had made a payment of Rs .300 as on 31-07-1985 as per the loan card issued in his favour . On comparison of the bank records , it was found that that amount was paid under loan SL 138/84 and remittance was made on 26-06-1985 for Rs . 200 but said remittance was not found mention in the relative ledger folio. He then referred to other loan repayments made in respect of SL 171/84 and vouchers dated 14-03-1985, 31-5-1985, 11-6-1985 and 11-7-1985 all in the handwriting of the first party and those , amounts were actually paid by the custonters on 12-3-1985 , 16-5-1985,10-6-1985 and 10-7-1985 respectively. He then referred to the loan card ofIRDP / SL/ 57/ 84 of one Smt . Palamma wherein there was an entry of Rs . 200 dated 2-7-1985 in loan cared . He then stated that this payment of Rs 200 has no relative entry in the ledger. He further stated that he also noticed the irregularities in respect of other five accounts of loan , details of which he gave at Para 5 of the affidavit stating that all those entries in the loan cards are in the handwriting of the firstparty but the payments made as per those loan cards have not been accounted in the relative ledger ofthe-bank . He then stated about the complaint made by said Kuri Boraiah about the withdrawal of Rs . 1500from his SB account by the first party and referred to another letter of 10037 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1, 1929.

the loans by the borrowers . Then he stated that he made certain entries with regard to the customers whose borrowers card have been produced and they show that along with him the other staff have also made entries on different dates and he also put initials along with other staff and therefore , he did not misappropriate any amount shown in the charge sheet . On page 8 he says that all the amount shown in the borrowers card and the dates mentioned therein have been deposited by the customers and there are corresponding entries to the above effect in the cashier scroll , officer's scroll and loan ladders . He then denied the allegation that he has withdrawn the money of Rs.1500/- belonging to the said Kuri Boraiah from his SB account on 22-07-1985 .

10. I would like to come to the statements ofMW2to MW4 and the first party in their cross examination and the aforesaid documents as and when it is found relevant and necessary .

Kuri Boraiah dated 11-10-1985 at Ex . ME- 4 marked in the enquiry . Then we have got the evidence of MW4 Shri Nagaraja Rao said to have made a detailed investigation into the various irregularities and the alleged misconduct committed by the first party . This witness has given a very detailed statement of facts referring to the rest of the loan cards and the vouchers bearing the entries made in the handwriting of the first party and initialed by him accordingly . In this way the witness has spoken to about 45 such documents which includes , loan cards and vouchers of various customers who had availed the small loan from the bank and had made repayments on different dates bearing testimony by loan cards . He has also spoken to the complaints /letters made by those customers to him during the course of investigation making the complaints that the amounts paid by some of them was not at all remitted with the bank and that the amounts paid by some of the customers was entered and remitted with the bank belatedly. In the further examination chief of MW3 the documents which were marked during the course of enquiry as Ex.ME3 , ME7 to 22 and ME 30 and ME 31 were marked before this tribunal at Ex . M5 to M 23 respectively . In the further examination chief of MW4 the documents which were marked during the course of enquiry at Ex.ME 33 to ME147 have been marked before this tribunal at Ex . M24 to M138 . The aforesaid documents namely, Ex . M5 to M138 include the loan cards issued to the customers in question , the challans prepared by the first party under his handwriting, the complaints given by the customers to the Investigation Officer MW4 and the other documents marked on behalf of the management at Ex.ME 139 series and ME 140 series are some other challans and the various letters/applications including his appeal memo sent to the management subsequent to the dismissal order passed againsthim.

11. Learnedcounsel for the Management Smt. Kasturi submitted that the oral as well as written arguments. Inher Written arguments while giving the gist of the facts leading to the dismissal of the first party and the enquiry, conducted against him before the dismissal order was passed and so also the litigation taken up before the Hon'ble High Court by way of Writ Petition, Writ appeal , the statement made by the first party in his cross examination as well as the statements of MW2 to MW4 made by way of oral testimony as well as affidavit evidence were repeated . At para 14 & 15 of her written arguments she referred to the statement of the first party in his cross examination wherein , he has shown ignorance if certain entries in the loan cards of the customers and the failure on his part to make relevant entries in the concerned bank records though admittedly he worked as a cashier and was responsible for the entries to be made in the loan cards as well as in the relevant bank records . There is also a contention that as per the letter at Ex. M3 written by the first party, he has admitted that an amount of Rs . 1500.was withdrawn for his sake . Therefore, these admissions and the documents produced before the court would go to establish the charges of misconduct committed by the first party and therefore , it is not a case fit for interference under Section 11A of the ID Act . Then the written arguments refer to the following 9 decisions produced by the learned counsel vide list dated 20-09-2007 .

1. 2005(4) LLN Page 1

2. 2003(4) SCC Page 364

3. 1996(2) LLN page 92 .:

4. 2006(3 ) SCC page 150

5. 2003LLR page 164

6. 1994 I LLJ page233 .

7. 1995 ILLJ page 1076

8. 20067 SCC page 212

9. 2005(6) SCC page 321

9. On his behalf the first party filed his affidavit evidence reiterating the various contentions taken by him in his claim statement. On page 5 of his affidavit the first party has given the details as to how the procedure for repayment of the loan is to be made by saying that for the payment a challan has to be filled showing the amount , name of the party, and has to be signed by the party and then there will be a counter foil to the challan in respect of the loan amount , once again showing the above said particulars , it is thereafter the amount will be paid to the cashier for corresponding entries in the Cash Scroll bearing bank seal to be passed to the officer who sits, next to the cashier and then the officer will enter the scroll in the scroll register and then scroll goes to the loan department and it isthereafter the counterfoil will given back to the customer andthen there will be an entry made in the borrower's card (loan card). On page 7 of the affidavit the first party says that the management has not produced before this tribunal the cashier scroll , officer scroll and the ledger entries which are relevant documents to prove the fact of repayment of 10038

[PART I-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

12. Whereas, learned counsel for the first party in his arguments vehemently contended that the charges leveled against the first party as per the charge sheets should have been proved by the management only by way of the documents namely, the Cashier Scroll, Officer's Scroll and the ledgers maintained by the management bank . His argument was that if these documents were produced they could have established the fact as to whether the amount which was received by the first party by way of the entries made in the loan cards , challans etc. and was not deposited with the bank at all or in some cases was deposited it belatedly and since these documents are held back by the management bank, the evidence produced before this tribunal will not help the management to substantiate the above said charges . He submitted that as far as the 3rd Charge leveled against the first party that he had withdrawn a sum ofRs.1500 from the SB account of said Kuriboraiah , theverywithdrawal slip at Ex. M1 will speak to the fact that it was the withdrawal slip signed by the said customer on its face as well as on its back and that it was the amount withdrawn by the customer himself and that to speak to the said fact rather the said charge the only competent and best witness was Mr. Kuriboraiah and since he is not before this court , said charge is to be answered in the negative . His last submission was that there is no charge against the first party that he did not make the entry of the challan in the cashier scroll or that he did not pass the counterfoil . He thensubmitted that the first party is already 59 years old and therefore , even if some of the charges are established against him, a lenient view may be taken exercising the powers under Section 11A of the ID Act .

13. I find substance in the arguments advanced for the management . As far as the two charges of misconduct leveled against him namely his misconduct of misappropriating the amount of Rs . 5190 and Rs . 500 as per the charge sheet- dated 16-11-1985 and 18-01-1986, by not crediting the same with the bank accounts and the charge leveled against him that he deposited various items ofthe amounts received by him from the customers with the bank, belatedly. As far as Charge No.3 that he withdrew a surn of Rs . 1500 on 22-07-1985 from the SB account of said Kuriboraiah is concerned, I must record a finding to the effect that this charge is not established against the first party . As noted above , in order to substantiate the aforesaid charges No.1 & 2 the management examined two important officers of the bank namely, MW3 and MW4 . MW3 was said to be working as Agricultural Officer in Kondlehally branch during the relevant time and as noted above , he has given the details of certain loan cards wherein, the entries have been made in the handwriting of the first party but the amount has not been accounted in the records of the bank namely, the ledger maintained by it . Likewise , MW4 in his affidavit evidence has spoken the various transactions with reference to the loan cards and the entries made therein , the vouchers in the handwriting

of the first party and the complaints made by various customers namely , the borrowers of the loan with the bank giving details of repayment of their loan amount fromtime to time bearing the entries in the handwriting of the first party along with the initials . If we come to the statement of MW3 in his cross examination who has spoken to the documents at Ex . M5 to M23 including the loan cards, challans etc. it is to be noted that not a single suggestion was made to this witness denying his affidavit evidence with reference to the above said documents . In his cross examination it was just elicited from him the procedure to be followed by the bank when certain amount is deposited in the bank. It was elicited that the payments made by the borrower shall be reflecting in the challan in the scroll and in the concerned registers and the cashier cannot make any entry in the card . It was elicited that the loan amount paidby the borrowers whose names are given in the affidavit and entries are found in the aforesaid loan cards must have corresponding entries in the aforesaid records of the bank with respect to the date of payment made by them and in case, one goes through the aforesaid documents namely, the cash scroll , the Officer's scroll and the loan ledger , the payment made as per the loan cards should be found therein. The suggestion made to the witness that the aforesaid records of the bank will disclose the payments made by the borrowers as per the loan cards has been denied . A last suggestion was made to this witness saying that the first party has not signed all the loan cards in question and some of the signatures found on those cards are not his signatures and that was the suggestion denied . During the course of cross examination of MW4 , it was elicited that he did not meet each and every borrower whose names are mentioned in the affidavit and that he has verified the bank records such as Cashier Scroll , Officer's Scroll and the Loan Ledgers with reference to the payments made in the loan cards of the said borrowers . He denied the suggestion once again made to the effect that the payment as shown in the loan cards do find entries in the aforesaid records and those payments have been made in the aforesaid bank records on the very same date they were made as per the loan cards . He denied the suggestion that those records are held back by the bank to suppress the fact. Here again there has been no suggestion made to MW4 denying a single transaction and the statement of the facts narrated by the witness with respect to the various transactions . Therefore , in the statements of cross examination of MW3 & MW4 , the only thing which was brought out was the defence of the first party that the documents maintained by the management bank namely, the cashier scroll , officer's scroll and loan ledger will be disclosing the fact that the payments made by the borrowers as per the loan cards have been reflected in those documents and that those documents have been held back by the bank the suppress the fact . Therefore , without denying and disputing the statements of facts with respect to the various transactions pertaining to the loan cards , challans 10039

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग I] ]--खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

which show the entries of the payments made by the borrowers . Now, with regard to the belated payment, he was to admit that for some of the amount received, he has made the entries in the bank records on the following day and in some cases may be after two to three days of the receipt ofthe amount . The fact that he made the entries in the loan cards of the borrowers putting his initials infact, as noted above, in his affidavit on page 7, he himself made the admission to say that he made certain entries with regard to the customers whose borrower cards are produced before this court . He made this admission with a rider that he made those entries along with other staff of the bank on different dates and put his initials along with them. This admission on the part of the first party once again makes it abundantly clear that he is not disputing the various entries made by him in those loan cards which show the various payments made by the borrowers against the loan taken from the bank. One more important and crucial admission made by the first party during the course ofhis cross examination is that the 10 challans marked at Ex. M41 series when confronted with him he was to admit that those challans are under his handwriting in the name ofvarious customers and that they are all loan repayment challans brought to him by the customers and written by him at their instance . It is not in dispute that the aforesaid challans showing the amounts paid by the borrowers as per the loan cards have not been taken into account of the bank and that they are not supported by cashier scroll or the officer'sscroll . Therefore , the cumulative effect ofthe various admissions made by the first party in his affidavit as well as in his cross examination and in view of the fact that the various averments made in the affidavits of MW3 &4 speaking to the loan cards in questior with reference tothe challans etc. have not been challenged and disputed by the first party, the only conclusion to be drawn by this tribunal would be that the charges of misconduct levelled against the first party under the aforesaid two charge sheets for not crediting the amount of Rs. 5190 and Rs . 500 as shown in the aforesaid two affidavits , details of which are given as per Annexure -Aand Annexure -A 1 respectively have been very much established by the manage- ment. Likewise , the details shown in various transactions as per the Annexure B & B1 with respect to the charge of misconduct committed by the first party for having made the credit entries belatedly have also been proved by the management in the oral testimony of the aforesaid two witnesses and the documents corroborating their evidence coupled with the admissions made by the first party.

and other documents , the first party infact, indirectly, admits those transactions as found in the loan cards as mentioned in the challans and as mentioned in the various complaints filed hy the customers to the above effect. His defence that the documents with the bank namely, the Cashier scroll, officer's scroll and loan ledger infact, will reveal the entries of the payments made by the borrowers as per the entries made in the loan cards must lead to an inference that he received the amount as per the loan cards and then made the relevant entries by passing a cashier scroll followed by officer's scroll and the entries in the loan ledgers . Now, the question arises as to whether the management in not producing those documents has made an attempt to suppress the facts . The plain answer to the said question would be in the negative. Firstly, for the reason that not a single document or the transaction as found mentioned in the affidavits of MW3 & 4 have been denied and disputed by the first party as noted above . The documents to which the first party wants to take help of not being produced by the management will not be the evidence in a positive sense . Infact , these are the documents by way of negative evidence . It just cannot be believed that despite the transactions recorded in the aforesaid documents maintained by the bank with reference to the entries made in the loan cards , the management thought of implicating the first party workman in the charges of misconduct leveled against him . That apart , the first partyhas come up with the present defence only by way of suggestion to the aforesaid two witnesses and by way of his affidavit before this tribunal having not taken such a defence either during the course of enquiry , by way of claim statement before this tribunal or by way of his appeal preferred against the dismissal order by him . Therefore , the defence taken by the first party that those documents will be disclosing the payments made as per the loan cards bearing his signatures (initials) and his handwriting being an after thought and an improved version is liable to be rejected on its face itself particularly, in the light of the admissions made by the first party in respect of certain documents during the course of his cross examination . In his cross examination it is very interesting to note that when a suggestion was made to him that he made certain entries in the loan cards of the customers and failed to make relevant entries in the concerned bank records, he comes with an answer that he did not know if he has done so . When he was confronted with the documents at Ex . M14, the loan card in the name of one customer by name Pallamma he admitted that the entry of name made is under his handwriting but he is not sure about the entries therein under his handwriting while admitting the fact that he was the cashier at the relevant point of time . When confronted with the vouchers at Ex . M 1 to M 135 , the first party admitted that they are under his handwriting but with a rider that the amount mentioned therein has not been paid. Further he admitted that the relevant loan cards as per the aforesaid vouchers are at Ex. M100, 102, 103,109 & Ex.M111

14.Now, coming to the 3rd charge against the first party that he withdrew a sum of Rs.1500 from the SB Account of the said customer Kuriboraiah without his knowledge playing fraud upon him by taking his signature on a bank withdrawal slip , I must say that the management has not proved this charge by sufficient and legal evidence . The withdrawal slip produced before this tribunal at Ex. 4935 G1/07-31 10040

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

(PART II --SEC. 3 (ii) ]

first party should be blamed but also the management bank for not following the correct and legal procedure and the practice followed under the bank rules under normal course .

16. Therefore , in the light of the above facts and taking into account the undisputed fact that the first party is now about 59 years old, it appears to me that ends of justice will be met if the first party is given the punishment ofCompulsory Retirement so that he could get some service benefits under the said scheme . Hence the following award:

AWARD

The first party is ordered to retire from his services compulsorily w.e.f. the date of original punishment of dismissal order passed against him . He shall get his service benefits subsequent to the date of the said punishment order . No orders to cost .

(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 8th November 2007)

M1 not only bears the signature of Shri Kuriboralah on its face but also on its back. Though there some complaints said to have been made by said Kuriboraiah have been marked at Ex. M2 & M4 suggesting to the fact that he did not receive the amount under the said pay slip and that his signature was obtained by the first party on some form but these complaints as such cannot be taken to be the proof of the matter . Having regard to the fact that the said customer signed the withdrawal slip on its face as well on the back as required under the rules of the bank, the only best and trustworthy evidence would have been the very statement of said Kuriboraiah before this tribunal . There is absplutely no explanation offered by the management as to what prevented it in not producing the said witness before this tribunal to testify to the fact of withdrawal of the amount under the said withdrawal slip. Therefore , I must record a finding to the effect that first two charges as noted above , have been proved against the first party and at the same time 3rd charge fails to be established.

A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3592.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 16/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-12012/192/2002- आई आर ( बी-11 ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 29th November , 2007

S.O. 3592.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 16/2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Bangalore as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Syndicate Bank and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 28-11-2007 .

[No. L-12012/ 192/2002 - IR (B - II) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR- COURT, BANGALORE- 560022

Dated : 2nd November , 2007 PRESENT Shri A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer C. R. No. 16/2003

15. Now a question arises as to what punishment the first party deserves for having committed such grave misconduct . The various decisions cited on behalf of the management are to suggest that in the cases like one on hand , where money was deposited by the account holder was not deposited with the bank by the cashier concerned and that he made a false entry in the pass book of the account holder, punishment of dismissal against him will be justified. There are also decisions on the point that in the cases where the misconduct of misappropriation of the fund has been committed by the Clerk or the cashier of the bank in the due course of his business they deserve no punishment lesser than the punishment of dismissal , the bank having lost its confidence in such an employee . However, under the facts of the present case , there emerges a very strong circumstance against the management rather a circumstance mitigating in favour of the first party not to invite the extreme punishment of dismissal against him. The fact that the bank in the present case to recover the loan amounts from the various borrowers has adopted a practice and procedure not known to the rules and regulations of the bank by issuing loan cards to the customersto get entry of the payment in those cards by the cashier concerned , in my opinion is the circumstance giving a long rope and wide scope to the first party indulging in the malpractices as alleged against him . If a proper and established practice as per the rules was to be followed by the bank in receiving the payments from the horrowers under a written challan against the counter foil to be issued by the cashier then there would not have been any scope or temptation for the first party in committing the misconducts now alleged against him . Therefore , for the misconducts/ irregularities committed by the first party not at all taking into credit certain payments trade by the borrowers into the bank accounts and in some cases making the entries in the bank accounts belatedly not only the 10041

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1, 1929

[ भाग II--खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

I PARTY

II PARTY

hearing and thereafter was dismissed from service w.e.f. 29-08-2001 .

M. R. Vemekar ,

TheAssistant General Manager ,

Sathyanarayanapet , Mestri Balappa Complex , Karnpli,

Bellary-583132

SyndicateBank, ZonalOffice, IRC, Gandhinagar , Banglore

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub -section 2A of the Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L- 12012/192/2002, ( IR (B - II) dated 22ndApril 2003 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Syndicate Bank isjustified in dismissing the service Shri M. R. Vernekar, Clerk w.e.f. 29-08-2001 ? If not , what relief he is the workman entitled to ?"

4. The first party by way of his claim statementbe- fore this tribunal challenged the enquiry proceedings on several grounds including the ground that it was conducted behind his back against the principles of natural justice without giving/him an opportunity to engage the services of a lawyer . He also challenged the enquiry findings as suffering from perversity and on the ground that the evi- dence was recorded during the course of enquiry behind his back and that the oral as well as documentary evidence produced during the course of enquiry was not legal and sufficienttohold him guilty of the charges . He also chal- lenged the dismissal order as illegal and unjust and the order of the appellate authority upholding the dismissal order on the ground that it was passed mechanically with- out application of the mind. He requested this tribunal to set aside the dismissal order passed against him and to reinstate him in service along with back wages and conti- nuity of service and all other consequential benefits .

2. A charge sheet dated 30th January 2001 along with the details of the transactions came to be issued against the first party as under :

Charge sheet

That you were functioning as Clerk- 1 emporary special Assistant at our Kampli branch since 3-9-1998 until you were placed under suspension by the Disciplinary Authority vide order No. SUSPN/2000/ 6 dated.6-10-2000 for the reasons stated therein , that while working in your position as such .

1. Between 2-5-2000 and 16-9-2000 you have fraudulently made fictitious credit aggregating to Rs.16,92,180 in 30 SB accounts of Bank's clients/your associates/ relatives and caused withdrawals thereof.

II . You were engaged in canvassing membership/ deposit from bank's clients, public relatives of staff members etc under money multiple/gift scheme of M/ s . Indian Green Glory Services Pvt . Ltd. Bangalore .

5. The management by its counter statement how- ever, asserted and maintained that the enquiry proceed- ings conducted against the first party were in tune with the principles of natural justice and that there was no wrong committed by the enquiry officer in conducting the enquiry exparte after he was afforded sufficient and rea- sonable opportunity to participate and to defend in the enquiry proceedings. The management also contended that the findings of the enquiry officer are very much based on sufficient oral and documentary evidence and supported by cogent and valid reasonings . The management further contended that the disciplinary authority committed no wrong in accepting the enquiry findings and passing the impugned punishment order of dismissal from service keep- ing in view the seriousness and gravity of the misconduct committed by the first party and ultimately requested this tribunal to reject the reference.

III . (a)You got discounted at Kampli branch , 4 self cheques aggregating to Rs.45,000 dmwn on your SB accountNO.19613 at Super Market Branch , Hubli without maintaining sufficient balance and

6.Keeping in view the respective contentions of the parties with regard to the validity and fairness or otherwise of the enquiry proceedings , this tribunal on 24-08-2004 framed the following preliminary issue . "Whether the Domestic Enquiry conducted against the first partyby the second party is fair and proper" .

(b) You have misutilised sundry advance and leave encashment under LTC extended to you during October 1999 and January 2000."

3. The first party in response to the charge sheet, wrote to the management not to hold enquiry as a criminal case is pending against him on the same set of charges in a competent cours of law and any stand taken by him in the DE will affect his defence in the criminal case . Thereafter , he approached the Hon'ble High Court challenging the charge sheet by filing a writ petition and that came tobe dismissed . Thereupon , he faced the enquiry and on the conclusion of the enquiry , enquiry findings were submit- ted holding him guilty of the aforesaid 3 charges leveled in the charge sheet . He was given opportunity of personal

7. During the course of trial of the said issue the management examined the enquiry officer as MW1 and whereas, the first party did not step into the witness box . Then the matter came to be posted for hearing of the argu- ments. On 13-11-2006, when the case was taken up for hearing, learned counsel filed a memo retiring from the case for want of instructions and copy of the ' acknowledgement due' served upon the first party. Therefore, learned coun- sel for the second party was heard in the matter and by order dated 1-12-2006 this court recorded a finding on the above said preliminary issue to the effect that the enquiry held against the first party by the second party is fair and 10042

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1, 1929

proper. On 16-3-2007 learned counsel for the second party washeard on merits and whereas, there was no representa- tion for the first party. However , the matter came to be posted for arguments to be advanced on behalf of the first party from time to time till 30.7.2007 on which date again the first party remained absent without any representation and further arguments of second party were heard . Once again the case was posted for arguments adjourning the matter twice but the first party did not choose to appear nor made any representation and therefore , the matter was posted for award .

8. Keeping in view the finding recorded by this tribunal on the validity and fairness or otherwise of the enquiry proceedings , the only two points to be considered are with regard to the alleged perversity of the findings and the quantum of the punishment . As noted above , learned counsel appearing for the first party retired from the case for want of more instructions and whereas , the first party who was served with the letter of learned coun- sel intimating him his desire to retire from the case did not appear before the court, nor made any efforts much less representation to this tribunal on his behalf. Therefore , as the things stand, there is no arguments on behalf of the first party to point out any legal or factual infirmities in the findings of the enquiry officer so as to term the same as perverse and arbitrary . Even otherwise on the safer side , this court thought itself to go through the findings of the enquiry officer so as to find out any legal or factual defect committed by the first party in recording the findings . A perusal of the enquiry findings and the evidence produced during the course of enquiry would disclose that as many as 536 documents were produced during the course of enquiry and the oral evidence of 3 witnesses as MW1 to MW3 was pressed into service on behalf of the manage- ment . While discussing the oral testimony of MW1 coupled with the documents at Ex.MEX.1 to MEX 344 on pages 32,33 &34 , the learned enquiry officer observed and gave the following reasonings in coming to the conclusion that charge No.1 as framed against the first party that he fraudu- lently made fictitious Credit entries aggregating to Rs.16.92 lakhs in 30 SB accounts of customers /his relatives/associ- ates and caused withdrawals of the same has been proved beyond any reasonable doubt .

"The oral and documentary evidence adducedbe- fore the enquiry forum reveals that Shri M.R. Vernekar , the CSE had financial dealing with the customers/his relatives and associates. Some of them have given letters to this effect . He had heavily borrowed moneys from them. Having failed to repay, the CSE made fictious credit entries intheir accounts , increased the balance and allowed them to withdraw moneys to the tune of Rs.16.92 lacs. In the process and to suppress his fraudulent acts he falsified brarich records by showing the credits as by way of cash, LSC, PD , VCC , DD etc. and also altered the figures in balancing books. He forged the initials of other officials of

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] the branch . His handwriting and initials have been identi- fied by MW2 another staff of the branch . The CSE commit- ted fraud, misled the authorities committed breach of trust and misappropriated bank's money. The CSE had dishon- est intention and was not loyal to the institutions . The evidence adduced by the MWs are not in dispute . When the CSE was supplied with the averments/depositions of MWs , he did not deny his involvement and role play in the above fraudulent transactions . Thus the management side case gone on record unrebutted . The evidence of MW1 &MW2 corroborate with each other . Further the CSE him- self has confessed his involvement and reimbursed a sum of Rs 4.00 lakhs on 9-11-2000 . In the above circumstances, I find that the charge framed against Shri MR Vernekar of having fraudulently made fictitious credit entries aggre- gating to Rs.16.92 lacs in 30 SB accounts of the bank's clients/his relatives/associates and caused withdrawals of the same has been proved beyond doubt . "

9. While discussing the documents from Ex.MEX 382 to 411 , MEX 422 to 430, MEX 437 to 454, MEX455 to 533 and the oral testimony of management witnesses, the learned enquiry officer on page 36 of his findings observed and gave reasonings on Second Charge as under :-

"The above circumstances amply establish the role played by the CSE in the above gift scheme . It is to be observed that Rs.950 being the admission charge for one new member , the CSE has canvassed 12 new members during the above period. It is also observed from MEX 382 to533 that during the period from 6-9-2000 to 29-9-2000 the gift amounts aggregating to Rs.1,42,650 have been sent to various members of the club by the CSE and some of them are clients of the bank . The role played by CSE shows that he was engaged in some business and canvaassed mem- bership/deposits frorn clients of the bank for the benefit of IGS, Bangalore and its members at the cost of the bank . Therefore , charge No. II is conclusively proved".

10. Likewise while discussing the rest of the docu- mentary evidence and the testimony of aforesaid withnesses on Charge No. 3 he assigned the following reasonings on page 38 as under:-

"Theabove evidence clearly establish that the CSE was in the habit of discounting cheque without maintaining sufficient balance and that during the period from January 2000 to June 2000 on 4 occasions, he discounted cheques for Rs 45,000 without sufficient balace . Again the sundry advace of Rs . 25.000 availed by him on 1-10-1999 and leave encashment of Rs . 11,964/- for the purpose of availing LTC was returned by him on 17-12-1999 . Again during February 2000 , he availed sundry advance of Rs.6,000/-and leave encashment of Rs . 12,174/-which he returned to the bank after some time . Once again duringAprill 2000 he availed Rs . 7500 as sundry advance and encashment of PL and submitted LTC bills belatedly on 1-8-2000 . The above conduct of [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

the CSE shows that he was in the habit of misusing bank's money for personal purpose. Further such conduct ofCSE availing sundry advance and leave encashment but not proceeding on LTC and discounting of cheques without sufficient balance amountto misappropriation of bank's money.

Inthese circumstances the third charge of doing acts prejudicial to the interest of the bank is proved beyond doubt ."

11. While summing up the findings, he made the following observations : " From the above analysis of evidence , it is evident that Shri MR Vernekar , the charge sheeted employee was highly financially indisciplined and was living beyond the means of his salary. The available evidence shows that he was highly indebted and to overcome his financial problems by misusing his official position , he made money and derived pecuniary advantage at the cost of the bank in unlawful and fraudulent manner exposing the bank to huge financial loss. The acts committed by the CSE constitute forgery, falsification of records , fabrication of false evidence , cheating, breach of trust , misappropriation and various other offences . Such attitude of CSE is dangerous and detrimental to the interest and survival of the Institution . " 12. Therefore, as could be read from the evidence and the reasonings given by the learned enquiry officer , the aforesaid charges of misconduct leveled against the first party have been proved by way of sufficient oral and documentary evidence infact, the evidence produced by the management during the course of enquiry orally as well as through documents has gone unchallenged and uncontroverted as the first party failed to attend and par- ticipate in the enquiry findings for the reason best known to him. Therefore, the findings of the enquiry officer since are based upon sufficient and legal voluminous evidence in turn supported by valid and cogent reasonings , by no stretch of imagination it can be said that they suffered from perversity in any way so as to be interfered at the hands of this tribunal.

13. Now, coming to the quantum of the punishment. As could be seen from the charges of misconduct leveled against the first party and proved during the course of enquiry they were very serious and grave in nature involv- ing moral turpitude of misappropriation of management bank fund to the tune of Rs.16.92 lakhs . The manner in which the first party made fictitious credit entries in the SB accounts of several bank customers to whom he owed huge debts and then allowed them to withdraw the amount from the bank as if the amount was credited by them, will tell the tale upon the fact that he indulged in these nefari- ous activities fraudulently to hoodwink the management bank working as a cash clerk cum special assistant . He being the custodian of the bank records and went on mak- ing false and fraudulent credit entries in the SB accounts of the several customers by himself and then caused with-

10043

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

drawals of those amounts by the customers thereby caus- ing huge financial loss to the bank, such an employee hav- ing lost his confidence in the management can never be allowed to remain in service any more. Therefore , the pun- ishment of dismissal imposed upon him was quite com- mensurate and proportionate to the gravity of the miscon- duct committed by him and hence the reference deserves tobe rejected hence the following award:

AWARD

The reference is dismissed . No costs .

(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signed by me on 2nd November 2007)

A. R. SIDDIQUI, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3593.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब व सिन्ध बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 15/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/15/2003- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 29th November , 2007

S.O. 3593.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 15/2003) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial. dispute between the management of Punjab and Sind Bank and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 27-11-2007.

[No. L. - 12012/ 15/2003 - IR (B.II)] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRIR.G SHUKLA PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT, KANPUR Industrial Dispute No. 15 of 2003

Inthe Matter of Dispute Between

Suresh Kumar C/o Sri B. P. Saxena, 426W.2 Basant Vihar , Kanpur.

And

TheManager Pujab & Sindh Bank Extension Counter Katariya Complex Sarojini Nagar , Kanpur.

10044

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007 /PAUSA 1 , 1929

AWARD

1. Central Government, MOL, New Delhi , vide notification No. L. - 12012/15/2003 - IR (B. -II) dated 20-5-03, has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :-

"Whether the action of the management of Punjab & Sind Bank, Kanpur in terminating the services of Sri Suresh Kumar w.e.f. 2-1-2002 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the concemed workman is entitled ? " 2. It is common ground that the workman was engaged by the opposite party bank and he was paid his wages at Rs . 45 per day . It is also common ground that the services of the workman were dispensed with by the opposite party bank w.e.f. 2-1-02.

3. It is the case of the workman that despite the fact that he worked as peon in the bank, opposite party bank instead ofmaking payment of wages at full scale rate used to pay the workman on daily rate basis . It is also admitted by the workman that no appointment letter was issued in his favour by the bank . Bank has also violated the provisions of Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , in as much as he has not been offered either notice , notice pay and retrenchment compensation by the bank at the time of dipensation of his service having regard to his admitted working which was more than 240 days of continuous service . It has also been alleged by the workman that after his termination the opposite party bank appointed one other person by name Sri Pradeep Kumar Tiwari .

On the basis of above pleadings it has been claimed by the workman that the action of the opposite party bank is an Unfair Labour Practice and that the action of the management be declared as illegal and unjust and he be directed to be reinstated in the service of the bank with all back wages, continuity of service and other consequential benefits .

4.On the contrary the claim of the workman has been denied vehemently on variety of grounds interalia alleging that for providing regular and permanent ernployment in the bank there is set selection process and no person can be allowed to in the employment of the bank without un- dergoing through selection process. It is admitted by the bank that it may be necessary to engage on a purely tem- porary and adhoc basis some persons from time to time . It has been denied by the bank that it ever terminated the services of the workman and that any termination order was is ued by the bank . The workman was never employed by the bank as a regular employee . His status was as a casual employee for undertaking casual job . It has also been alleged that no officer or manager has any right or authority to appoint any employee therefore there is no question of appointment of the applicant concerned . Ap- plicant is not a workman as defined under Section 2 (s) of the Act being a casual labour . Bank has also disputed the continuous working of the applicant during the period 25-6-98 ta 2-1-02 . On the basis of above pleadings it has

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] been alleged that the claim of the workman is devoid of merit and is therefore , liable to be rejected .

5. Apart from adducing oral evidence , contesting parties have also ' filed certain documents in the shape of evidence.

6. Tribunal has heard the arguments of the contest- ing parties at length and have also gone through the recordcarefully.

7. Workman has examined himself as W.W.J who on oath has stated that he was engaged by the bank at 45 rupees per day . In his cross examination he has admit- ted that he was engaged by the branch manager of the bank without any written orders witness has also admitted the fact that he was never interviewed by the selection committee . He did not receive any amount except weges at daily rate basis. Witness has also admitted that no orders terminating the service were ever issued by the Bank .

8. Inview of evidence of the workman it will be seen ifhis evidence is sufficient to grant him relief as has been claimed by him and as to whether or not he has ever com- pleted 240 days of continuous service prior to termination of his service in a calendar year. Oral testimony of witness is not sufficient to believe this stand that he worked con- tinuously for more than 240 days unless the same is cor- roborated by documentary evidence . There is no docu- ment filed by him to prove that he completed more than240 days of continuous service in one calendar year prior to the date of alleged termination . Heavy burden lies upon the workman to prove his continuous working over 240 days in a calendar year preceding the date of termination .

9. Be that as it may the controversey that whether a daily rated employce , casual employee , adhoc employee or other wise has any right to claim regular and permanent employeent without undergoing through selection process has now been set at rest by the Hon'bl e Supreme Court of India, in the case of Secretary state of Karnataka and others and Uma Devi and others 2006 (109 ) FLR 826 , wherein the Hon'ble supreme Court has held that Scheme ofPublic Employment broadly governed by the constitu- tional mandate contained in these provisions . Constitu- tion does not contemplate any employment outside con- stitutional scheme and without following requirements laid down therein . The law prepounded by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India apply with full swing to the facts and circumstances of the case in hand . Admittedly the workman has never been appointed by the bank after hold- ing selection process, no appointment letter was ever is- sued by the bank in his favour, nor any letter termination the services of the workman was ever issued by the bank, therefore , he has no right to claim employment in the bank which of course is a public employment . The Labour courts/ Industrial Tribunals are not forums to provide back door entry in the garb of violation of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act .

[ 'भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

10. For the reasons discussed above , it is held that the "Workman has no right to claim employment in the bank and it is also held that the action of the managanent is legal and fair as a result of the same the workman is not entitled for the relief claimed by him. Accordingly refer- ence is answered against the "workman and in favour of the bank opposite party. ১

R. G. SHUKLA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर , 2007

का. आ. 3594. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एल. आई. सी. ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , बैंगलोर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 85/1992 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[ सं..एल -17012/34/92- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the29th November, 2007 S.O. 3594. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref . No. 85/1992) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Bangalore as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of LIC of India and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 28-11-2007.

[No. L. -17012/34/92-IR (B. - II)] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT,

BANGALORE

Dated: 13th Novermber , 2007

PRESENT

SHRI A. R. SIDDIQUI, Presiding Officer C. R. No. 85/1992

I PARTY

Shri Nafees Pasha , S/o , Aziz Sahab , H. No. 8-6-145 , Udgir Road, Bidar-585401

II PARTY

The Sr. Divisional Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Divisional Office , PB No. 43 . Amruth Prakaslı Sath Kachari Road , Raichur.

10045

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

AWARD

1.The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub -section 2A of the Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred this dispute vide order No. L.17012/34/92 - IR (B.II) dated 8th December, 1992 for adjudication on the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Life In- surance Corporation of India, Raichur Division, Raichur in terminating the services of Shri Nafees Pasha , S/o Shri Aziz Saheb , Ex. Sweeper- Cum- Messenger is justified? If not what relief the workman is entitled? "

2.The case ofthe first party workman , as made out in the Claim Statement, in brief, is that he being appointed by the management to work at Bidar branch, Raichur Division started working with the management as Sweeper -Cum- Messengerfrom 01-04-1985 till he was refused work w.e.f. 28-11-1987 . He discharged his duties sincerely and hon- estly but for no reasons whatsoever , he was refused work by the management. He contended that while was in ser- vice, he had made several requests to the management to regularize his services and to pay wages on par with the permanent workman and to that management developed hostile and adamant attitude towards him resulting into termination of his services . His several requests to get back the job went in vain . Therefore , the first party con- tended that the action of the management in refusing work to him is illegal and not sustainable in the eye of law , as much as, it tantamounts to retrenchment as defined under Section 2(oo) of the ID Act without compliance of manda- tory provision of Section 25F of the ID Act. Therefore, he raised the dispute before the jurisdictional Labour and Con- ciliation Officer and on account of adamant and hostile attitude of the management conciliation proceedings ended in failure resulting into the present reference ; that after the reference to this tribunal an exparte award was passed and he filed a Miscellaneous Petition bearing No. 2/93 to recall the award and when the said Miscellaneous Petition came to be rejected he approached the Hon'ble High Court and thereafter the matter has been remanded back to this tribu- nal for fresh disposal in accordance with law. Therefore, he requested this tribunal to set aside the termination order and reinstate him in service with all consequential benefits.

3.The management by its counter statement, among other things, contended that the first party was working as a casual labour on daily wage basis at Bidar branch office ofthe management and he was working only for 1½ hours per day andwas being paid wages once in a week . He was sweeping the office premises which were located in two different buildings within a distance of half a Km from one another . He was working on purely temporary basis from 1-4-1985 and his services were to be terminated as another candidate sponsored through employment exchange was posted and the first party did not get his name sponsored 10046

[PART II -SEC. 3( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

witness as MW1 . By way of rebuttal, the first party exam- ined himself and got marked 4 documents at Ex . W1 to W4 . Thereupon , learned counsel for the management filed his written arguments and after hearing the learned counsel for the first party, the matter is posted this day for award.

through Employment Exchange despite being advised by the management ; that the first party was employed purely on adhoc/temporary basis and when the branch office started functioning from one building from November 1987, the services of the first party workman were not consid- ered necessary and were dispensed with ; that the services of the first party were utilized from 01-04-1985 to 31-1-1986, from 1-04-1986 to 31-12-1986 and from 1-01-1987 to 20-11-1987 and at no time he was assured regular em- ployment in either of the cadres ; that for the appointment ofSweeper and peon on regular basis the management is to follow the procedure as per LIC Class III & IV Recruit- ment Instructions, 1979 which are deemed to be rules made by the Central Govt. under Section 48(2) (cc) of LJC Act , 1956 as amended by LIC( Amendment Act , 1981) ; that the case of the first party for regular appointment could have been considered only if he was eligible as per the aforesaid instructions if he competed with eligible candidate at the relevant point of time ; that the first party since was work- ing as a casual labourer on daily wage basis , that too, for 1½ hours a day and was being paid wages once In a week, the question of breach of violation of any provisions of the ID Act does not arises . The management in its counter statement thereafter referred to several decisions on the point that the first party being a casual labourer working on temporary basis could not seek regular employment and that his termination comes under Section 2(00) (bb ) of the ID Act and not under Section 2(00) of the ID Act . Therefore , the management requested this tribunal to dis- miss the reference .

6. The Statement of MW1 in his examination chief by way of his affidavit evidence is just the repetition of the contentions taken by the management to the effect that the first party was working with the management from 1-04-1985 as a casual labourer Sweeping the office pre- mises located in two different buildings . He worked as such from 01-04-1985 to 31-01-1986 , from 1-04-1986to 31-12-1986 and from1-01-1987 to 20-11-1987 . He stated that when the office started working from one building i.e. from November 1987 , the services of the first party were found unnecessary and were dispensed with . He also stated that the first party did not get his name sponsored through the Employment Exchange and therefore, his name could not considered for regular appointment . Then, he referred to the documents already marked at Ex.M1 to M16 in the state- ment of management witness ( recorded by this tribunal before the award was passed and the matter was remanded to this tribunal ) . He referred to those documents at Ex.M1 to M16 as payment vouchers made to the first party. He referred to the documents at Ex.M17,18 &19 namely, the payment of bonus arrears to the first party and the communication made by the management to the ALC, respectively. During the course of cross examination of MW1 , he admitted that the first party joined the services of the management as a Sweeper- Cum- Messenger on 1-04-1985 and worked as such up till 28-11-1987 with a rider that it was on casual basis and was intermittently. He ad- mitted the first party was working for six days a week and the work of Sweeper-cum -Messenger was all along on each day ofthe working . While , admitting the fact that the man- agement regularized the services of other Sweepers - Cum- Messengers , he stated that the names of those workers were sponsored through the Employment Exchange . He did not deny the suggestion that the first party worked for a period of 240 days in each calendar year saying that he is not aware of it .

4. It would appear from the records that after the reference to this tribunal when the matter was taken up for hearing, both the parties made appearance through coun- sels but no claim statement as such was filed on behalf of the first party . On the other hand Counter Statement was filed by the management and evidence on its behalf was adduced by examining one witness as MW1 and getting marked documents at Ex.M1 to M19 . Thereupon , this tri- bunal by award dated 11-10-1993 rejected the reference holding that the action of the management in terminating his services was justified . It would appear from the records that the first party then filed a miscellaneous application No.2/ 1993 before this tribunal to recall the aforesaid award passed exparte . This tribunal rejected the said application and then the first party approached the Hon'ble High Court in WP No.11288/2003 challenging the above said order passed by this tribunal on miscellaneous petition and his Lordship by order dated 22-11-2006 allowed the writ peti- tion setting aside the order of this tribunal on the aforesaid miscellaneous petition . Allowed the Miscellaneous Peti- tion itself and ordered to restore the original reference pro- ceedings on board with a direction to this tribunal to dis- pose off the matter afresh as expeditiously as possible .

7. Now, coming to the statement of the first party againby way of affidavit evidence . It is also the replica of the averments made in the claim statement and therefore , need not be repeated once again . In his cross examination it was elicited that he was doing the job of Sweeper be- tween 9 AM to 10.30 AM and then was being engaged as a Messenger . It was elicited that it is on his approach to the branch Manager , he was taken into the employment . It was elicited that he was working from morning to evening and was being paid wages monthly . He worked for six days a week and he worked in this way uptill 28-11-1987by signing the attendance register . It was further elicited from his mouth that he worked between the year 1985 and 1987 continuously without any break . He denied the sugges- 5.After the remand , both the parties filed their plead- ings and the management examined once again one 10047

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

tion that after he was out of the service of the management , he has been gainfully employed . He denied the suggestion that he was just working for about 1½ hours in a day and not for the full day. He denied the suggestion that he worked with the management during the aforesaid period and did not work with the management during the gap between the said period . As noted above , in his examina- tion chief the first party got marked 4 documents at Ex . W1 to W4. Ex. W1 is the certificate dated 1-07-1989 issued by the Sr.Branch Manager of the management corporation certifying to the effect that the first party worked as a temporary Sweeper for the period from 1-08-1985 to 31-12-1986. Ex .W2 &3 are the receipts for payment of sub- scription towards the membership of the Union and Ex.W4 isthe failure reporť given by the Conciliation Officer .

8. Learned counsel for the management as noted above, filed his written arguments almost reiterating the various contentions taken by the management in its counter statement and relied upon several decisionsin support of hisarguments.

9. Whereas, the learned counsel for the first party in his arguments submitted that there is sufficient material brought on record by way of oral testimony of the first party, in the oral testimony of the management witness himself and the documents produced by the management coupled with the admissions made by the management in its counter statement to suggest that the first party was in the service of the management as a Sweeper -Cum-Mes- senger all along between of the year 1985 & 1987 and that he undisputedly worked for a period of more than 240days in 12 calendar months immediately preceding the date of his terrnination .

10. After having gone through the records , I find substance in the arguments advanced for the first party. Keeping in view the points under reference schedule , the pleadings of the parties and the evidence brought on record, the fact to be established by the first party work- man was whether the first party worked with the manage- ment as a sweeper-cum - messenger for a period of more than 240 days in a 12 calendar months prececling the date of his termination . The fact that the first party worked with the management w.e.f. 01-04-1985 to 31-01-1986,1-04-1986 to 31-12-1986 and 1-01-1987 to 20-11-1987 has been admit- ted by the management in very clear words not only in its Counter Statement but also in the affidavit statement of the management witness as well as by way of suggestion tothe first party in his cross examination as noted above . Leaving aside the services rendered by the first party work- man between 1-04-1985 and 31-12-1986 it is to be noted that he admittedly worked with the management from 1-1-1987 to 20-11-1987 continuously and therefore , there cannot be any doubt in the mind of this tribunal to come to the conclusion that the first party worked with the man- agement during the aforesaid period continuously and thereby fulfilled the requirements of Section 25(B) of the

IDAct read with Section 2(oo) and 25F thereof. In order to meet the case of the first party , the management as could appear from the pleadings as well as the evidence adduced on its behalf has gone on taking self conflicting stands . As noted above , in one place the management took up the contention that the services of the first party workman were terminated there being a selection of regular candi- date as Sweeper - Cum- Messenger and in other place it took upthe contention that when the office of the management started working from one building, it was found unneces- sary to take the services of the first party and therefore , were dispensed with. The management took up the con- tention that since the first party's name was not spon- sored through the Employment Exchange , he was discon- tinued from service . The management then took up a con- tention that the first party was just working as a Sweeper and not as a Messenger . Whereas, the very aforesaid pay- ment vouchers produced by the management at Ex.M1 to M16 will tell the tale upon the fact that the first party has been paid wages not only for having worked as a Sweeper but also for having worked as a Messenger . Infact, as noted above, MW1 in his opening sentence of his cross exami- nation itself admitted that the first party was working as a Sweeper. -Cum-Messenger and as noted above , in the cross examination of the first party also it was elicited from his mouth that he was doing the job of Sweeper between 9 AM & 10.30 AM and then he was in the duty of aMessen- ger.The next contention of the management which again is selfdenying is that its office was working only for 5 days aweek and the services of the first party were taken only for 5 days and that too for 1½ hours . MW1 in his cross examinationwas to admit that their office was working for six days a week and the work of sweeper - cum- messenger was all along on each day of the working. From the perusal ofthe aforesaid payment vouchers , it is to be seen that the first party has been paid a meagre amount of Rs . 1001 and odd for working as a Sweeper but has been paid wages of Rs . 3001 and odd for discharging his duties as a messen- ger . Therefore, the contention of the management that he worked only for 1-1/2 hours a day and that it was only for 5days in a week again must be rejected as false and moti- vated . Now, therefore , as could be seen from the aforesaid records, viz. the documents produced by the management itself, the statement of MW1 , the statement of first party in his cross-examination it is very much established that the claim put forth by the first party is well founded and sup- portedby the material on record and whereas , the various contentions taken by the management to meet the case of the first party are self denying being self conflicting . The only relevant contention for the management taken in this context would be the services of the first party were taken intermittently that contention again is self conflicting when the management by way of counter statement , by way of statement of MW1 and by way of suggestion to WW1 in no uncertain terms came out with the case that the first party worked with the management from 1-1-1987 to 4935G1/07-32 10048

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22 , 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

20-11-1987. It is never the case of the management that in between 1-1-1987 and 20-11-1987 the first party was out of the employment or did not work with the management in the capacity of sweeper - cum- messenger . Infact , the man- agement though produced the aforesaid payment vouch- ers for the period up till 2-1-1986 but very conveniently did not produce any payment voucher subsequentto the afore- said period which conduct of the management itself would speak to the fact that the management has made a deliber- ate attempt consciously , to suppress the material before this tribunal speaking to the fact that the first party was working with the management continuously during the aforesaid three to four spells as indicated in the Counter Statement as well as by way of oral and documentary evi- dence produced before this tribunal . In the result, the only conclusion to be drawn would be that the first party worked with the management continuosly for a period of 240days and more immediately prior to the termination of his ser- vices . Therefore , as argued for the first party , the action of the management comes within the purview of Section 2(00) of the ID Act , amountingto retrenchment and since undisputedly, the management did not comply with the provisions of Section 25F of the ID Act, the retrenchment beccomes illegal amounting to illegal termination to be set aside by this tribunal as illegal and void abinitio .

11. The various citations relied upon by the manage- ment in my humble opinion will not be applicable to the facts of the present case. In the first case reported in AIR 2006 SC 1806, the dispute was with regard to the regularisation of the services of a daily wager and their Lordship held the view that appointment being not under due process of selection under the constitutional scheme no right will be conferred on appointee such as a daily wager. Similar , was the view taken by their Lordship of Supreme Court in the case reported in 2006 AIR SCW 1235 laying down the principle that when the employee was appointed as a daily wager but not against a sanctioned vacant post by the authority concerned, then such an em- ployee cannot be made permanent . Principle laid downby their Lordship of Supreme Court reported in AIR 2006 SC 387will not be applicable to the present case for the reason that the appointment of the first party in the case on hand is not a contractual appointment to bring it under the pur- view of Section 2(oo)(bb) of the ID Act . Similar are the principle laid down by their Lordship of Supreme Court in a case reported in AIR 1994 SC 1343. The principle laid downby their Lordship of Supreme Court in AIR 1989 SC 1958will be of no avail to the facts of the present case . It is the case of enhancing the age of superannuation not in- volving any point of retrenchment or illegal termination oming under the provisions of Section 2(00) read with Section 25F of the IDAct . The principle laid down by their Lordship of Supreme Court reported in AIR 1998 SC 327

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] again in my humble opinion will not be attractive to the facts of the present case as that was the case of an appointment of a regular employee on probation and whereas, we are concerned with the case of a temporary employee working on daily wage basis. Therefore, the vari- ous decisions cited on behalf of the management to sup- port its contention that the case on hand does not come within the purview of retrenchment will not come to its rescue. In the present case we are very much concerned with the provisions of Section 25 (B) read with Section 2(00) and Section 25F of the ID Act . As noted above , the first party has fulfilled the condition of having worked with the management for a period of one year i.e. for a period of 240 days continuously immediately preceding the date of his termination as contemplated under the above said provi- sion . There is therefore , a clear case of retrenchment as defined under Section 2( oo) and since the retrenchment is not precededby compliance of Section 25F of the ID Act , it is a case of illegal retrenchment tantamount to illegal termination . In the result, the action of the management as noted above , is held to be illegal and void abinitio.

12. In the light of the aforesaid finding holding the termination of the first party as illegal , the natural corollary would be the reinstatement of the first party workman into the services of the management with all consequential benefits including the back wages, continuity of service etc.Hence the following award:

AWARD

The management is directed to reinstate the first party workman in its services with full back wages and continuity of service and all other consequential benefits . No costs .

(Dictated to PA, transcribed by her , corrected and signed by me on 13th November 2007)

A. R. SIDDIQUI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 29 नवम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 3595. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एल. आई. सी. ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 16/2006) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-11-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-17012/30/2000- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 29th November , 2007 S.O. 3595. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 16/2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court , Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure in the [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of LIC of India and their workman, whichwas received by the Central Government on 27-11-2007.

10049

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1, 1929

[No. L- 17012/30/2000- IR (B- II)]

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT AT AHMEDABAD

PRESENT

Shri A.A. ' LAD' In Charge/Presiding Officer Reference (CGITA) No. 16 of 2006 Employers in relation to the Management of LifeInsuranceCorporation of India The Divisional Manager

LICof India

Division No. 87

Suraj Plaza-2, Sayajigunj

FirstParty

Vadodara (Gujarat)

AND

TheirWorkman ,

Sh . Sureshchandra Naginbhai Tailor

Kamal Park Society Hami Road, Behind Mangalya Society

Vadodara

2.Second Party has filed statement ofclaim at Ex . 4 in the present case making out case that, second party joined as Typist in the year 1990 and was confirmed by S. R. No.439658 as permanent workman in the first party institution . Charge sheet dated 6th April , 1998 was issued by the first party institution, wherein it was alleged that, in School Leaving Certificate No. 340 GR No. 321 , dated 29-3-1989 in the certicficate ofH. V. Shroff Memorial High School caste was manipulated and on the basis of this , backward cast certificate was obtained on 1st May , 1989 and School Levaing Certificate was manipulated for getting the benefit of backward class to obtain job in first party institution. It was alleged that in view of said charge sheet, first party institution has investigated for the same and thereafter while considering the oral and other evidences into the inquiry proceedings , said charges are proved . Enquiry Officer has given the finding that charges are proved without assigning any reason. In view of said findings second party was issued a show cause notice dated 6th February 1989. Second party had given the reply in writing on 4th March , 1999. Without considering the said reply and evidence, the second party was dismissed fromthe service by letter dated 6th March, 1999. It is alleged by second party that the said order is illegal, erroneous and improper and not sufficient for the purpose of termination . So it is prayed that, the same be quashed.

SecondParty

APPEARANCES

For the Employer

Shra M. J. Sheth

Advocate

For the Workman

Shri P. C. Chaudhary

Advocate

Date of passing award 28th September , 2007

AWARD

1. This reference is referred to this Industrial Tribunal under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 sub- section 2 A ( 1 ) ( D) by Ministry of Labour , New Delhi by Order No. L- 17012/ 30/2000/IR (B- II) dated 2-3-2001 for adjudication for the disputes under the law . The facts as stated in the Schedule according to reference are as under:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the Managerment of Life Insurance Corporation of India, Baroda División Baroda in terminating the services of Shri Suresh N.Tailor w.e.f.6-3-1999 vide order dated 6-3-1999 by way of removal from the services, is legal , proper and justified? If not , what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and what other directions are necessary in the matter ? "

3. In addition , it was submitted that, sub caste of the second party is "Hindu Shoemaker" . The Social Welfare Officer has issued a caste certificate in view of the affidavit made by the father of the second party and also on the basis of school record . So it is contended that, no person can be punished for the caste certificate issued by the competent Officer . It is not proved in the Inquiry proceedings that , second party has obtained the service fraudulently by making some correction in the caste in School Leaving Certificate and thus the order of termination dated 6th March, 1999 issued by the first party institution isillegal, improper and hence , required to be quashed and set aside and second party is entitled for reinstatement with continuation of service along with the back wages .

4.Written reply is given by the first party institution below Ex . 7 wherein it denied statement of demand of the second party and has contended that there is no change in the caste according to affidavit. In the original certificate it is mentioned as " Hindu Tailor" . In addition if on the basis ofSchool Leaving Certificate if competent officer had issued a caste certificate , it cannot be said false but in the case of second party the same is as fraud and forgery is made by him. First party institution is registered under Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 and is a Corporation and doing the business. First party is acting under Article 12 of the Constitution of India, the Staff Regulation , 1960 is applicable to all the labourers . Industrial Disputes Act is not applicable to the first party . Second party has obtained the service by producing false caste certificate and for the 10050

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

said reason second party has violated Article 21 & 23 of staff Regulation 1960 as well as second party has obtained the services illegally and got the benefit of reservation wrongly and hence , for the said reasons first party institution while following under regulation , 1960 in the case of second party, charge sheeted him , conducted inquiry by offering all opportunities under principles of natural justice .After the investigation the Inquiry Officer observed charges were proved against the second party and the order of dismissal was taken on that basis . According to first party, termination is legal , proper and hence the same is required to be confirmed and Rs . 25000 by way of cost be awarded to the first party institution.

5. In the present case , the second party has produced 24 documents alongwith list below Ex.13 , 2 documents alongwith list below Ex . 16 & 6 documents alongwith list below Ex . 77. By consent it is exhibited as Ex. 53 to 69, 70- 71, 72/1 to 72/6 and 94 to 100.

6. The second party has given the deposition in the form of affidavit below Ex . 18, wherein he has stated that , since last 10 years i.e. from 18th February, 1990 he was serving as Typist in LIC. He claims as a member of Hindu family. His father was tailor and therefore this surname is mentioned . The LIC has given him charge sheet on dated 6th April, 1998. He had replied it by Ex. 16/2 . The Inquiry proceedings were initiated in his presence . LIC had issued one show cause notice to him which he has replied . He was terminated on 6th March , 1999. He had tried to get service after termination but did not get the job and at present he is unemployed. He states that , he is staying in joint family with his father , and he is maintaining him . His wife is ayurvedic doctor . Charges as mentioned in the charge sheet are not admitted to him . He received a certificate from social welfare of his caste as " Hindu Mochi " . The same is produced by him in the examination- in-chief. In the cross examination he states that , for getting the service in LIC, he applied for that service , but alongwith said application caste certificates he has produced . He was asked to produce during enquiry proceedings and the Inquiry Officer has told him to produce original School Leaving Certificate which he produced. He remained present in the enquiry proceedings alongwith certificate. The Inquiry Officer after verifying original certificate gave it back to him. Above referred School Leaving Certificate was demanded by InquiryOfficer . He denied he assure to send it by registered. post. He admits that , before obtaining service in LIC, he has applied on 17-10-1989 for the purpose of getting the Job in LIC . The document below Ex.83 is his sub- caste certificate mentioning as " Hindu Mochi " . He admits that, he got it from H. V. Shroff, High School . He admits that, the School Leaving Certificate wherein "Hindu Tailor " was mentioned was corrected as "Hindu Mochi " and he had produced the said school leaving certificate in LIC . He states that , certificate produced below Ex.79 wherein

[PART II-SBC. 3 (ii)] H.V.Shroff High School is mentioned. He states that, the LIC has issued a letter dated 23rd October 1998 for the purpose of production of original School Leaving Certificate which is received by him . Certain note is mentioned at the bottom of letter below Ex . 80 and he admits his signature at the bottom for the same . He states that thereafter another letter dated 6-11-1998 was issued by the LIC which he received . He states that , he had replied the said letter by Ex . 86. He admits that alongwith letter at Ex . 87 he had submitted the letter dated 10th November , 1998. He admits that, other remaining documents alongwith letter dated 10th November , 1998 in respect of Ex. 87 were not produced.He states that , certificate below Ex . 78 was issued to him in viewof School Leaving Certificate (Hindu Mochi) . He states that, this certificate was obtained by him from District B. C. Welfare Baroda Vadodara . He states that , he is not in a position to produce another duplicate School Leaving Certificate from H. V. Shroff School in the present case. He states that , at present he is unemployed and not doing any business .According to him from termination till today, he tried to get the job but did not demand it in writing . He admits that , after termination , he had not tried for job .

7. Below Ex. 9 list total 34 documents are produced bythe first party institutions which are Ex. 19 to 52 .

8. First party examined at Ex. 89 Principal of the School at Ex . 90 Mr. Makwana Clerk of the school at Ex . 91 Inquiry Officer at Ex. 92 .

9. The principal states that, certificate below Ex . 79 is prepared by him and it bears his signature . He admits that , this certificate was prepared as per the instructions of the LIC. He states that , he has prepared this certificate as per the record of the school . He states that , School Leaving Certificate produced at Ex. 82 is of his school , wherein Shri S.N. Tailor of the concemed student is as mentioned with caste "Hindu Cobbler" . He admits his signature on copy at Ex. 82. He states that, said true copy was given to LIC on demand of the LIC taking from the original . Original is produced before the court . (The School Leaving Certificate at Ex. 82 is at page No. 340 and general registration No. 321 is mentioned to it .) As against this, in the cross examination he states , that , when any student is admitted in the school the information which is provided by the guardian regarding sumame and other details , are record inthe record of the school . He has no right or jurisdiction toverify the facts whether it is true or false as submitted by the guardian . The certificate below Ex. 79 is given according toG. R. but same is not at present with him . He states that, the handwriting and signature are similar to that of Ex. 82 and 83. He states that , the certificate below Ex . 79 which is given before that the note is put in the said institution . At that time, he was not in service . He admits that, if original School Leaving Certificate is lost, in that case , duplicate certificate is issued after producing affidavit to that effect . He admits , the certificate below Ex . 82 & 83 are issued by the school .

10051 ['माग II-खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

10. Shri Vinod Dhulabhai Makwana, the witness No. 2Clerk ofH. V. Shroff High School is examined on oath at Ex. No. 90 stated that :

"I am serving in H. V. Shroff Memorial School. My post in the school is junior clerk . Last 15 years I am serving in the school . The School Leaving Certificate below Ex. 82 is prepared by me . My signature appears in the said certificateas preparing clerk. The certificate at Ex. 83,wherein sub-caste "Hindu Mochi" is mentioned is the same is not writtenby me" .

As against this in the cross -examination he has said that:

"Certificates below Ex . 82 are issued by the school . I can not say whether hand writing are similar for the facts stated in the certificate -at Ex . 82 Hindu Tailor Vadodara and Hindu Mochi at Ex . 83 "

11. Shri Ashish Prabhakar Joshi , the witness of the company is examined on oath at Ex . 92. He has said in the examination- in-chief that:

13. Since at Ahmedabad no regular P.O. was appointed the direction given by remanding reference back and to decide it within sex months were not complied. During my sitting at Ahmedabad , in the capacity of additonal charge of Central Government Industrial Tribunal , Ahmedabad, first party's advocate rather in the nature of complaint referred these directions and drew my attention towards it saying that, this Tribunal has to decide whither it has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the reference . Said was accepted by the second party's advocate , Shri Chaudhary . However, both ignored later paragraph no.8 of the judgment of Gujarat High Court where instructions were given to decide entire reference if it hold thisTribunal has jurisdiction over the subject matter involved in the reference the subject matter referred in the reference after hearing both . When both advocates did not press that point, and were eager to dispose of the reference, and did not express that, they want to add any other evidence besides the evidence recorded by Vadodara Tribunal , I presume that, they are relying on the evidence on record and asking me to proceed on it and decide the reference as earlier it .

14. At the time of arguments before me learned Advocate for second party union referred the English translation of the award of Industrial Tribunal (Central), Vadodara taking it from the file of the first party's advocate and referred page 44 more precisely the, bottom portion of it, where it is mentioned like this:

"I was serving as Manager in the first party institution in Vadodara in year 1998. In the case of second party, I was appointed as Inquiry Officer. The registered cover dated 12-11-1998 was issued by second party during the inquiry proceedings . I had opened one letter received in the said cover . The said letter was dated 10-11-1998 . In the said cover there was only one letter and no such School Leaving Certificate of the second party was attached. Relevant note I have made on the said cover . My signature appears against the said note at Ex .86.

As against this in the cross-examination he has said that:

"In the prsent case first party institution LIC of India is doing the procedure systematically. While recovering the premium issuing insurance policy , thus doingbusiness . Therefore , first party is an institution within the definition of industry. Therefore first party isan industry. The first party institution in its reply has mentioned one decision but said decision is not applicable in the present case. The facts of the said decision are all together different than the present case and hence first party institution is " industry" which is proved and Industrial Disputes Act 1947 is applicable".

"The cover was received by me on 12-11-1998. It is true that this cover was received on 12-11-1998 but no such note is made by me in the inquiry proceedings . It is true that, this cover after 6 days on dated 17-11-1998 , I had opened in inquiry. During the proceedings, the objection pertaining to opening the cover, the note to this effect was made , but I have not investigated for the same. I can not say whether second party had attached original school leaving certificate in the cover or not"

12. Heard the arguments of representatives of cencerned parties afresh at this stage. This is rather third round of this litigation. At first round reference was disposed of by Industrial Tribunal ( Central ), Vadodara by passing award dated 31-3-2003 . Said was challenged before : Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat by filing Special Civil Application No. 8540 of 2003 and Hon'ble Gujarat High Court observed that , the contention taken by the first party about "jurisdiction of Tribunal ", appears not considered and decidedby Industrial Tribunal, (Central ) vadodara and remanded reference directing Tribunal to decide first, issue ofjurisdiction and then if Tribunal found it has jurisdiction , shall proceed to decide entire reference on merits within six months fromthe receipt of the writ .

Taking reference of this typed portion from page 44 of the English copy ofAward of Industrial Tribunal (Central) , Vadodara , which is not objected by even first party's advocate, submits that , Industrial Tribunal (Central) Vadodara has decided the point of jurisdiction very well . He submits that , advocate appearing for second party before Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat might have failed to point out that portion . According to second party's Advocate it does not mean that point ofjurisdiction is not considered by Industrial Tribunal (Central) Vadodara, when matter was before Industrial Tribunal (Central) Vadodara . On this , there was no reply from first party's Advocate who is appearing in this reference before me . Even it is to be noted that , Award of Industrial Tribunal (Central) Vadodara is inGujarati and second party's advocate took 10052

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 22, 2007/PAUSA 1 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] copyof the translation of it from the custody of first party's advocate knowing that , Incharge/Presiding Officer , Central Government Industrial Tribunal Ahmedabad does not know Gujarati language and place reliance on bottom portion of page 44 as stated above. So from this it is crystal clear that , Industrial Tribunal ( Central) , Vadodara has decided jurisdiction point and observed it has jurisdiction over the subject matter referred in the reference .

16. One more citation referred by the first party's advocate to oust jurisdiction of this Tribunal regarding LIC employees is the citation published in I LLJ 1994 SC page 597. That was case between M. Venugopla and LIC of India where point regardings regulation relating to terms and conditions were under challenge . As per regulation 14, LIC was empowered to terminate the employment of probationer during probation if work of such probationer found unsatisfactory treating said termination is not retrenchment and Section 2 (oo ) does not apply to such a retrenchment. Under that provision , if any probationer is removed, LIC has right to terminate the employment of such employee during probation period and while doing that, LIC is not supposed to observe the provisions of Industrial disputes Act as observed while retrenching the employees on other grounds . So in that case also , taking reference of amendment carried out in Section 48 (2) (cc) of LIC Act which empowers LIC to terminate the employee during probation if work of such probationer found not satisfactory. As far as termination of the probationary employee is concerned , action taken by LIC in that respect observed can not come under the scrutiny of provisions of Industrial Disputes Act and Industrial Disputes Act is not applicable to such a decision . In this case also except that area . LIC Act regarding other termination , is not protected and it can be challenged under Industrial Disputes Act and Trinunal has jurisdiction over it. As rest of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act are applicable to the rest of the employees of LIC in other area , these two decisions does not debar CGIT to consider the grievances of the LIC employees . In these two cases it is observed that, Special Act i.e , LIC Act has upper hand since it was made by introducing Section 48 (2) (cc) in LIC Act which is treated at par with Industrial Disputes Act observing LIC Act vis -a-vis Industrial Disputes Act are passed by the parliament and both have equal status and sanctity. So according to me , the two case laws more precisely decision givenby Apex Court in Vanugopal and Nanchane does not come in the way of this Tribunal to consider the grievances of this type of the employees involved in the reference since nature of grievance of these cases are quite different to those of case which is at hand . Besides this , learned advocate for second party referred decision of Allahabad High Court published in III LLJ 1995 page 467, 1983 II LLJ page 429 decision of Apex Court, Citation published in 1995 III LLJ page 797 decision of Bombay High Court, citation published in 1982 LAB IC page 1864 ofRajasthan High Court and citation published in 1994 LLR page 573 Allahabad High Court reveals that , dispute between employees of LIC of India and LIC can be very well come under the scrutiny of Industrial Disputes Act, and Tribunal has jurisdiction over it . Besides he referred the Repealing and Amendment Act 1988 which was also passed by Parliament and placed reliance on Schedule 1 page 12 of the said Act , where against the LIC Act of 1981 it is shown that the whole act is " amended" . That means as 15. Besides Ld. Advocate for the first party appearing before me , referred two important decisions of Apex Court published in 1982 I LLJ page 110 it is case of Nachanae and Ors . V/ s. Union of India & ors . In the form of Writ Petition where point bonus and DA of LIC employées of Class III and IV was under scrutiny and in that case (supra) rules were made by LIC under Section 48 (2) ( cc) deprivingClass III and IV employees of the LIC to claim bonus and dearness allowance . Accordingto unión . Section 48 (2) (cc) can not be incorporated and it can not be made applicable to the Class III and IV LIC employees by which right it bonus and DA which they were getting can be taken away. According to employees , Parliament can not pass such a regulation and such a regulation if passed, is against provisions of Industrial Disputes Act and in that case , without following provisions of Industrial disputes Act , such type of " change" can not be made which affect on class of employees . While deciding that , Apex Court observed that , when rules are made by incorporating Section 48 (2) (cc ) in the Life Insurance CorporationAct, depriving the LIC employees of Class III & IV to claim bonus and DA with retrospective effect, in that, case provisions of Industrial dispute Act does not apply and Tribunal has no jurisdiction to decide the sanctity of such an amendment . So according to me, the facts of that case (Supra) i.e, case of Nachane and ors are different to the facts of case at hand involved in the reference . It is no where stated that , Industrial disputes Act is no applicable to the employees of LIC. On the contrary , it is observed that , LIC Act and Industrial Disputes Act both are passed by parliament . Since both are passed by Parliament , both are at part and none of it prevails over other.As far as amendent made in Section 48 (2) ( cc) of LIC Act, is concerned, it is pertaining to bonus and DA regarding LIC Class III and IV employees . It was also discussed in that case since LIC class III and IV employees were already getting higher scale than the scale of its cadre with other employees of other department it was considered that, it is not necessary to protect the right to claim bonus and DA of the LICClass III & IV employees . As per settlement took place on 24-1-1974 and 6-2-1974 said benefits were given to those employees on the basis of above two settlements . Since LIC Class III & Class IV employees were already getting good salary and benefits than other employees of their cadre in other departments, by making charge in Section48 (2) (cc) of LIC Aet, said facility is withdrawn and itisobserved that, in that case Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain grievance of that type of employees.

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

perthe Repealing and Amendment Act 1988 the entire LIC Act is amended on which first party's advocate submits that, it is not like that which is not supported by any of his convincing points to accept his case and discard the case of second party.

17. Considering this position and decision of Apex Court given in Nachane and Venugopal case and various other cases referred by second party's advocate. I conclude that this Tribunal has jurisdiction over the subject matter.

18. As far as relief given to second party is concerned, it was not under scrutiny of Hon'ble High Court ofGujarat . The evidence which I have referred above reveals that, action of the LIC dated 6-3-1999 is unjustified and unfair . The charge of preparing false document about caste is not proved against second party. Even witness of the LIC admits that document was produced by second party obtaining it from the competent authority and relying on that, entry was made in the service record of the second party. The charge levelled against second party for forgery

10053

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 22 , 2007/पौष 1 , 1929

is not proved. When charge is not proved , it cannot be observed that , decision taken by first party in terminating second party was just and proper. When decision taken of the first party was taken on wrong facts and wrong assumptions . I conclude that , decision of the first party must be quashed and set aside with direction to first party totreat second party as its employee and give benefits as given by Industrial Tribunal (Central) Vadodara by its order dated31-3-2003 . Hence the order :

ORDER

Termination under challenge dated 6-3-1999 is quashed and set aside with direction to first party to follow the order of Industrial Tribunal (Central) , Vadodara passed on 31-3-2003 and comply it within 60 days from the knowledge of the order and report.

Date: 28-09-07

Court-Ahmedabad .

A. A. LAD, Presiding Officer

Printedby the Manager , Govt . of India Press, Ring Road , Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054.