This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. (एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003-05 भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 3]

No. 3 ]

नई दिल्ली , जनवरी 13जनवरी 19 , 2008 , शनिवार पौष 23- पौष 29, 1929 NEW DELHI, JANUARY 13 JANUARY 19, 2008, SATURDAY/PAUSA 23-PAUSA 29, 1929.

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके SeparatePaging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II-खण्ड 3-उप - खण्ड ( ii) PART II-Section 3 Sub- section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issuedby the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

विधि और न्याय मंत्रालय

अवधि के लिए या अगले आदेश होने तक , इनमें से जो भी पूर्वत्तर हो, अपर लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है । (विधि कार्य विभाग )

नई दिल्ली , 19 दिसम्बर, 2007

[फा. सं. 23 ( 2)/2007 -न्यायिक ] एम. ए. खान युसुफी, संयुक्त सचिव और सरकारी काउंसेल

MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE (Department ofLegalAffairs) New Delhi , the 19th December , 2007

का.आ. 85.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 (1974का 2 ) की धारा 24 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , श्रीमती रूमा अनिल नवाले , अधिवक्ता को मुंबई उच्च न्यायालय में भारत संघ या केन्द्रीय सरकार के किसी विभाग या कार्यालय द्वारा या उसके विरुद्ध सभी दांडिक मामलों का , जिनके अंतर्गत दांडिक रिट याचिकाएं, दांडिक अपीलें , दाडिक पुनरीक्षण , दांडिक निर्देश और आपराधिक आवेदन भी हैं, संचालन करने के प्रयोजन के लिए इस शर्त के अधीन रहते हुए कि श्रीमती रूमा अनिल नवाले, अधिवक्ता अपर लोक अभियोजक के रूप में अपनी नियुक्ति की अवधि के दौरान भारत संघ या केन्द्रीय सरकार के किसी विभाग या कार्यालय के विरुद्ध ऊपर निर्दिष्ट किसी आपराधिक मामले में मुंबई उच्च न्यायालय में उपसंजात नहीं होंगी , तत्काल प्रभाव से दो वर्ष की

S.O. 85. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints of Mrs. Ruma Anil Navale , Advocate as Additional Public Prosecutor for the purpose ofconducting all criminal cases including criminal writ petitions, criminal appeals, criminal revisions, criminal references and criminal applications by or against the Union of India or any Department or Office of the Central Government, in the HighCourt ofJudicature at Mumbai , with immediate effect 62G1/2008

(159) 160

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ]

उसके अधीन सम्पदा अधिकारियों को प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करेंगे और उन्हें सौंपे गए कर्तव्यों को पूरा करेंगे : -

सारणी

क्रम अधिकारी का पदनाम

सं.

सरकारी स्थानों की श्रेणियां तथा क्षेत्राधिकार की स्थानीय सीमाएं fon a period of two years or until further orders , whichever is earlier, subject to the condition that Mrs. Ruma Anil Navale, Advocate shall not appear against the Union of India or any Department or Office of the Central Government in any criminal case referred to above in the High Court of Judicature at Mumbai during the period of her appointment.

(2)

(3) [F. No. 23(2)/2007- Judl . ] (1)

M. A. KHAN YUSUFI , Jt . Secy. and G.C.

1. सहायक महाप्रबंधक, यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके (सामान्य प्रशा. ) , द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे यूको. बैंक, 1 , आर.एन. पर लिए गए तथा पश्चिम बंगाल मुखर्जी रोड, कोलकाता राज्य में स्थित स्थान । 700001

विस मंत्रालय (वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 7 जनवरी , 2008

2. अंचल प्रबंधक , अंचल यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके कार्यालय , लखनऊ , द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे स्काईलार्क बिल्डिंग , 28 , पर लिए गए तथा उत्तर प्रदेश नवल किशोर रोड, राज्य में स्थित स्थान ।

लखनऊ -226001

का. आ. 86. - भारतीय निर्यात- आयात बैंक अधिनियम, 1981 (1981 का 28 ) की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ङ ) के उप-खंड ( ) के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा डॉ. के.सी. चक्रवर्ती, अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक, पंजाब नेशनल बैंक को उनके पद ग्रहण करने की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक जो भी पहले हो , भारतीय निर्यात आयात बैंक के निदेशक मंडल में अंशकालिक गैर- सरकारी निदेशक के पद पर नियुक्त करवी है ।

3. अंचल प्रबंधक, अंचल यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके कार्यालय, रायपुर, 97 , द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे आनंद नगर , जी.ई. रोड, पर लिए गए तथा छत्तीसगढ़ राज्य रायपुर-492001 मेंस्थित स्थान ।

[फा. सं. 24/27/2002- आईएफ -1 ] रमन कुमार गौड़ , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Financial Services )

4. अंचल प्रबंधक , अंचल यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके कार्यालय , बरेली , द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे 35/ए/8 , - रामपुर गार्डन , पर लिए गए तथा उत्तराखंड प्रभा सिनेमा के सामने , राज्य में स्थित स्थान । बरेली-243001

5. अंचल प्रबंधक , अंचल कार्यालय , रांची , राजेन्द्र जवान भवन, सह सैनिक यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा झारखंड बाजार , मेन रोड, राज्य में स्थित स्थान । रांची-834001

New Delhi , the 7th January , 2008 S.O. 86. In pursuance of sub -clause ( ii ) of clause (e) of sub- section (1 ) of Section 6 of the Export Import Bank ofIndiaAct, 1981 (28 of 1981 ) , Central Government hereby appoints Dr. K.C. Chakrabarty , Chairman & Man- aging Director , Punjab National Bank as part- time non- officialDirector , on the Board ofDirectors of Exim Bank for a period of three years from the date of taking over charge ofthepost or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 24/27/2002- IF- I ]

अंचल प्रबंधक, अंचल यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके कार्यालय , यूको बैंक, द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे 5 , संसद मार्ग , पर लिए गए तथा राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्रदिल्ली और जम्मूएवं कश्मीर राज्य में स्थित स्थान । नई दिल्ली-110001

RAMAN KUMAR GAUR, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 7 जनवरी , 2008

7. अंचल प्रबंधक , अंचल कार्यालय , यूको बैंक, यूको बैंक बिल्डिंग, यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा तमिलनाडु राज्य तथा पांडचेरी संघ राज्य क्षेत्र में स्थित स्थान । 169, थम्बूचेट्टी स्ट्रीट , चेन्नई-600001

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके

द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे

पर लिए गए तथा महाराष्ट्र

एवं गोवा राज्य तथा दमन एवं

दीव संघ राज्य क्षेत्र में दीव क्षेत्र

8. सहायक प्रबंधक, अंचल कार्यालय , यूको बैंक , मफतलाल सेंटर ( दूसरी मंजिल) , नरीमन प्वाइंट , मुम्बई -400021

मेंस्थित स्थान ।

का.आ. 87.-सरकारी स्थान ( अप्राधिकृत अधिभोगियों की बेदखली ) अधिनियम , 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए और दिनांक 12-2-2001 के भारत सरकार, विच मंत्रालय , आर्थिक कार्य विभाग , ( बैंकिंग प्रभाग ) की अधिसूचना सं. 13-1-2001-बीओए काअधिक्रमण करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार, एतद्द्वारा , सरकार के राजपत्रित अधिकारी के स्तर के समकक्ष अधिकारी होति पर निम्नलिखित सारणी के कालम ( 2 ) में उल्लिखित अधिकारियों को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजन के लिए सम्पदा अधिकारियों के रूप में नियुक्त करती है , जो सारणी के कालम (3 ) में उल्लिखित सरकारी स्थानों के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम द्वारा या 161

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19, 2008/पौष 29, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड. 3(ii) ]

(1)

(2)

(3) 9.

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा बिहार राज्य में स्थित स्थान । अंचल प्रबंधक , अंचल कार्यालय , यूको बैंक, "मार्यलोक", " ए " ब्लाक , चौथी मंजिल , डाक बंगला रोड, पटना-800001

10.

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा उड़ीसा राज्य में स्थित स्थान ।

अंचल प्रबंधक, अंचल कार्यालय , यूको बैंक, यूको बैंक बिल्डिंग , सी-2, अशोक नगर , यूनिट-2, भुवनेश्वर-751009

11. अंचल प्रबंधक, अंचल कार्यालय, यूको बैंक , मणिराम दीवान रोड, सिलपुखुरी, गुवाहाटी -781003

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा असम, मेघालय , त्रिपुरा , मणिपुर , नागालैण्ड, अरुणाचल प्रदेश और मिजोरम राज्यमें स्थित स्थान ।

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा गुजरात राज्य तथा दमन एवं दीव संघ राज्य क्षेत्र में दमन क्षेत्र में स्थित स्थान। 12. अंचल प्रबंधक , अंचल कार्यालय , यूको बैंक, यूको भवन , पो.बा.सं. 4085 , सन्यास आश्रम के निकट, आश्रम रोड , अहमदाबाद-380009

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा पंजाब एवं हरियाणा राज्य तथा चण्डीगढ़ संघ राज्य क्षेत्र में स्थित स्थान । 13. अंचल प्रबंधक , अंचल कार्यालय, यूको बैंक, एससीओ 55-57 , बैंक स्क्वायर , सेक्टर -17बी , चण्डीगढ़ -160017

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा राजस्थान राज्य में स्थित स्थान । 14. अंचल प्रबंधक, अंचल कार्यालय , यूको बैंक , आर्केड इंटरनेशनल , अजमेर रोड सिविल लाइन्स, जयपुर-302016 (राजस्थान)

15. अंचल प्रबंधक , अंचल कार्यालय, यूको बैंक, ई/ 5 , अरेरा कालोनी , भोपाल-462016

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा मध्य प्रदेश राज्यमें स्थित स्थान ।

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा कर्नाटक राज्य में स्थित स्थान । 16. अंचल प्रबंधक , अंचल कार्यालय , यूको बैंकं , यूको बैंक बिल्डिंग , 13/22 , कैंपेगोडा रोड , बेंगलूर-560009

(3)

(2)

(1)

17.

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य में स्थित स्थान । !

अंचल प्रबंधक, अंचल कार्यालय , यूको बैंक , पो.बा.सं. 59 , हिमलैण्ड होटल , सर्कुलर रोड, शिमला-171001

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में स्थित स्थान । 18. अंचल प्रबंधक , अंचल कार्यालय, यूको बैंक , 8-2-64, भूतल, रोड नं. 10 , बंजारा हिल्स, हैदराबाद-500034

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा केरल राज्य में स्थितस्थान ।

19. अंचल प्रबंधक, अंचल कार्यालय , यूको बैंक, टीसी 25/2286 ( 1 ) , यूको बैंक बिल्डिंग , ओवर ब्रिज जंक्शन , तिरुवनंतपुरम -695001.

[फा. सं. 65 (2 ) /2007-बी ओ- II ] एस. गोपाल कृष्ण , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 7th January, 2008

S.O. 87. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971) and in supersession of theNotification ofthe Government of India in the Ministry ofFinance,Department ofEconomic Affairs, No. 13/1/2001- BOA dated 12-02-2001 , the Central Government hereby appoints the officers mentioned in column (2) of the Table below, being officers equivalent to the rank of a Gazetted Officer ofGovernment to be Estate Officers for the purpose ofthe said Act, who shall exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties imposed on the Estate Officer by or under the said Act , in respect of the public premises specified in column (3 ) of the said table.

TABLE

SL. Designation of the No. officer

Categories of Public Premises And Local Limits ofJurisdiction

(2)

(1)

(3)

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of West Bengal .

Asstt. General Manager, (General Adminis- tration) , UCO Bank, 1, R.N. Mukherjee Rd. , Kolkata-700001 .

2 Zonal Manager, ZonalOffice, Lucknow, SkylarkBuilding, 28 , Nawal Kishore Road , Lucknow-226001.

Premisesbelonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Uttar Pradesh .

162

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] (2)

(1)

(3)

(2)

3. Zonal Manager, 1 Zonal Office, Raipur , 97, Anand Nagar , G.E.Road, Raipur-492001

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Chattisgarh .

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Gujarat and Daman area in theUnion Territory of Daman & Diu .

12. Zonal Manager , ZonalOffice, UCO Bank, UCO Bhawan , PB No. 4085 , Near Sanyas Ashram, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad-380009 .

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Uttarakhand .

ZonalManager, Zonal Office,Bareilly 35/A/8-Rampur Garden Opp. Prabha Cinema Bareilly-243001

13. Zonal Manager , Zonal Office, UCO Bank, S.C.O. 55-57, Bank Square , Sector- 17B , Chandigarh- 160017.

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Punjab & Haryana and in the Union Territory of Chandigarh

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Jharkhand.

Zonal Manager , ZonalOffice, Ranchi RajendraJawan Bhawan Cum Sainik Bazar, Main Road, Ranchi-834001.

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Rajasthan.

Zonal Manager , Zonal Office , UCO Bank, 5, Sansad Marg, New Delhi - 110001 .

14. Zonal Manager, ZonalOffice, UCO Bank , Arcade Inter- national , Ajmer Road , Civil Lines, Jaipur- 302016, (Rajasthan).

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the National Capital Territoy of Delhi and State of Jammu & Kashmir .

15. Zonal Manager, ZonalOffice, UCO Bank, E/ 5, Area Colony, Bhopal- 462016.

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Madhya Pradesh .

Zonal Manager, Zonal Office , UCO Bank , UCO Bank Building, 169, Thambu, Chetty Street, Chennai -600001 .

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Tamilnadu and in the Union Territory ofPondicherry.

Premisesbelonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Karnataka.

16. Zonal Manager , Zonal Office, UCO Bank , UCO Bank Building, 13/22, Kem- pegowda Road, Bangalore-560009.

Asstt.GeneralManager Zonal Office, UCO Bank, Mafatlal Centre (2nd floor), Nariman Point, Mumbai -400021 .

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the States of Maharashtra & Goa and Diu area in the Union Territory ofDaman & Diu .

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Himachal Pradesh .

17. Zonal Manager, Zonal Office, UCO Bank , P.B. No. 59, Himland Hotel , CircularRoad, Shimla-171001 .

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Bihar .

Zonal Manager , Zonal Office, UCO Bank, 'Mauryalok' , 'A'Block, 4th floor, Dak Bungalow Road , Patna-800001.

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Andhra Pradesh .

18. Zonal Manager , Zonal Office , UCO Bank, 8-2-64 ,Gr . Floor , Road No. 10, Banjara Hills , Hyderabad- 500034.

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Orissa.

10, Zonal Manager, ZonalOffice , UCO Bank, UCO Bank Building, C- 2 , Ashok Nagar, Unit - II , Bhubaneswar- 751009 .

11.

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Kerala.

19. Zonal Manager , Zonal Office, UCO Bank, TC25/2286( 1 ), UCO Bank Building , OverBridge Junction , Thiruvananthapuram- 695001.

Zonal Manager , ZonalOffice,UCO Bank, Maniram Dewan Road, Silpukhuri , Guwahati -781003.

[F. No. 65 (2)/2007 -BO. II ] Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the States ofAssam, Meghalaya , Tripura, Manipur, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh and Mizoram,

S. GOPAL KRISHNA, Under Secy .

[भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 7 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 88.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबन्ध एवं प्रकीण उपबंध) स्कीम , 1970/1980 के खण्ड 3 के उपखण्ड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित, बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उपधारा 3 ( ज ) और ( 3 - क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एत‌द्वारा , श्री सतीश गोयल को अधिसूचना की तिथि से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा उनके उत्तराधिकारी की नियुक्ति होने तक अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो , कार्पोरेशन बैंक के निदेशक मंडल में. अंशकालिक गैर - सरकारी निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. 9/22/2006-बीओ -1 ] जी. बी. सिंह , उप सचिव New Delhi , the 7th December , 2007 S.O. 88. In exercise of the powers conferred by of sub -clause 3 (h) and (3 -A) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub-clause (1) of clause 3 of the Nationalized Banks (Management & Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme , 1970/1980, the Central Government, hereby nominates Shri Satish Goel , as part time non- official director on the Board of Directors of Corporation Bank for a period of three years from the date of notification or until further orders , whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 9/22/2006-BO- 1 ] G. B. SINGH, Dy. Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 11 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 89.- निक्षेप बीमा और प्रत्यय गारंटी निगम अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 47 ) की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 2 ) के खण्ड ( ii ) के साथ पठित धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( घ ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात्, एतद्वारा , श्री उमेश चन्द्र सारंगी , अध्यक्ष, नाबार्ड को अधिसूचना जारी किए जाने की तारीख से और दिनांक2-12-2010 तक अर्थात् नाबार्ड के अध्यक्ष के रूप में उनके कार्यकाल की समाप्ति तक अथवा अगले आदेशों तक , जो भी पहले हो , श्री वाई.एस.पी. थोराट के स्थान पर निक्षेप बीमा और प्रत्यय गारंटी निगम (डीआईसीजीसी ) के निदेशक मण्डल में निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।

[फा. सं. 7/4/2007-बीओ -1 ]

जी. बी. सिंह, उप सचिव New Delhi , the 11th January , 2008 S.O. 89. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1 ) of Section 6 read with clause (ii) of sub-section 2 of Seotion 6 of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961 (47 of 1961), the Central Government in consultation with Reserve Bank of India, hereby nominates Shri Umesh Chandra Sarangi , Chairman, NABARD as a director on the Board ofDirectors of Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation

163

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29, 1929

(DICGC) from the date of notification and upto 02-12-2010 i.e. the date of expiry of his tenure as Chairman , NABARD or until further orders whichever is earlier vice Shri Y.S.P. Thorat.

[F. No. 7/4/2007 -BO -1 ] G. B. SINGH, Dy . Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 15 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 90.- बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम , 1949 ( 1949 का 10 ) की धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर, एतद्द्वारा घोषणा करती है कि उपरोक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 के उपबंध , इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से पांच वर्षों के लिए बैंक आफ इंडिया पर लागू नहीं होंगे ।

[फा. सं. 11/8/2007- बीओए ] डी. पी. भारद्वाज , उप सचिव New Delhi , the 15th January, 2008 S.O. 90. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section53 ofthe Banking Regulation Act, 1949 ( 10 of 1949), theGovernment of India, on the recommendation of Reserve Bank of India, hereby declares that the provisions of Section 13 of the said Act shall not apply , for a period of five years from the date of this Notification , to Bank of India.

[F. No. 11/8/2007 -BOA] D. P. BHARDWAJ , Dy. Secy .

(राजस्व विभाग)

केन्द्रीय आर्थिक आसूचना ब्यूरो (कोफेपोसा अनुभाग )

आदेश

नई दिल्ली, 8 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 91.-यतः संयुक्त सचिव , भारत सरकार जिन्हें विदेशी मुद्रा संरक्षण और तस्करी निवारण अधिनियम , 1974 ( 1974 का 52) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत विशेष रूप से शक्ति प्रदान की गई है , ने उक्त उप - धारा के अधीन आदेश फाइल सं. 673/06/2007 - सी.यू.एस. - 8 , दिनांक 05-12-2007 को जारी किया और यह निर्देश दिया कि श्री दीपक कुमार , उर्फ दीपक बत्रा, सुपुत्र श्री ओम प्रकाश बत्रा , निवासी -1431 , गोपाल स्ट्रीट, संगत रशन , पहाड़गंज , नई दिल्ली को निरुद्ध कर लिया जाए और केन्द्रीय कारागार , तिहाड़ , नई दिल्ली में अभिरक्षा में रखा जाए ताकि उन्हें भविष्य में चीजों की तस्करी करने से राका जा सके ।

2. अतः केन्द्रीय सरकार के पास यह विश्वास करने का कारण है कि पूर्वोक्त व्यक्ति फरार हो गया है या स्वयं को छिपा रखा है जिससे यह आदेश निष्पादित नहीं किया जा सकता । 3. अतः अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्ति का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा पूर्वोक्त व्यक्ति को यह निर्देश देती है कि वह शासकीय 164

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

राजपत्र में इस आदेश के प्रकाशित होने के 7 दिन के भीतर पुलिस आयुक्त , दिल्ली के सम्मुख उपस्थित हो ।

[फा. सं. 673/06/2007 - सि.यू.एस. VIII ]

वी. के. खन्ना , उप सचिव (Department of Revenue)

(COFEPOSA SECTION)

CENTRAL ECONOMIC INTELLIGENCE BUREAU

ORDER

New Delhi , the 8th January, 2008 S.O. 91. Whereas the Joint Secretary to the Government of India , specially empowered under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act , 1974 (52of1974) issued order F. No. 673/06/2007-Cus . VIII dated 05-12-2007 under the said sub - section directing that Shri Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Batra, S/o Shri Om Prakash Batra, R/ o 1431 , Gopal Street, Sangat Rashan , Pahar Ganj , New Delhi be detained and kept in custody in the Central Jail , Tihar , New Delhi with a view to preventing him from Smuggling goods in future ,

2. Whereas the Central Government has reasons to believe that the aforesaid person has absconded or is concealing himself so that the order cannot be executed .

3. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( b) of sub- section ( 1) of Section 7 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs the aforesaid person to appear before the Commissioner of Police , Delhi within 7days of the publication of this order in the Official Gazette.

[F. No. 673/06/2007 -Cus . VIII] V. K. KHANNA, Dy . Secy.

विदेश मंत्रालय (सी.पी.वी. प्रभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आई. 92.- राजनयिक कौंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ एवं शुल्क) अधिनियम 1948 (1948 का 41 वां ) के खण्ड 2 के अंक ( क) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा भारत का राजदूतावास , वियंशियेन में श्री प्रवीन सी. काला , सहायक को 31-12-2007 से सहायक कौंसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[सं. टी -4330/01/2006 ]

प्रीतम लाल , अवर सचिव ( कौंसुलर ) MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS (C.P.V. Division)

New Delhi , the 31st December , 2007 S.O. 92. In pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers ( Oaths and fees) Act, 1948, the Central Government hereby authorize Shri Praveen C. Kala, Assistant to perform the duties of

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] Assistant Consular Officer in the Embassy of India , Vientiane with effect from 31st December , 2007 .

[No. T. 4330/1/2006] PRITAM LAL, Under Secy .( Consular) स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय नईदिल्ली, 7 जनवरी , 2008

क्ला.आ. 93.- केन्द्र सरकार ने भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण में और अरूणाचल प्रदेश सरकार से परामर्श करने के बाद डा. हेग लेडर , निदेशक , स्वास्थ्य सेवाएं , अरूणाचल प्रदेश, नाहरलगुन को 16-12-2007 से पांच वर्षों के लिए भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद के सदस्य के रूप में मनोनीत किया गया है ।

अतः अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में , केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा भारत सरकार के तत्कालीन स्वास्थ्य मंत्रालय की दिनांक 9 जनवरी , 1960 की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 138 में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:-

उक्त अधिसूचना में " धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड (क) के अधीन मनोनीत " शीर्षक के अंतर्गत क्रम संख्या 24 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी; अर्थात्:-

अरूणाचल प्रदेश सरकार " " 24. डा. हेग लेडर ,

निदेशक , स्वास्थ्यसेवाएं,

अरूणाचल प्रदेश ,

नाहरलगुन

[संख्या वी-11013 /2/2007- एमई ( नीति-1 ) ]

टी. जे. एस. चावला , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE New Delhi , the 7th January, 2008 S.O. 93. Whereas the Central Government , in pursuance of clause (a) of sub - section ( 1) of Section 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956) and in consultation with the Government of Arunachal Pradesh have nominated Dr. Hage Lador , Director of Health Services, Arunachal Pradesh , Naharlagun to be a member of the Medical Council of India for five years with effect from16-12-2007.

Now, therefore, in pursuance of the provision of sub section ( 1) of Section 3 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendment in the Notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry of Health number S.O. 138 dated the 9th January, 1960, namely:-

In the said Notification , under the heading , "Nominated under clause (a) of sub section (1 ) of Section 165

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:

3", for serial number 24 and the entries thereto , the following entries shall be substituted , namely :-

SCHEDULE

"24. Dr. Hage Lador Govt . of Arunachal Pradesh "

Director ofHealth .

Services, Arunachal Pradesh , Naharlagun

No. and year ofthe amendment

Sl. No. & Year of the No. Indian Standards Established

Date from which the amendment shall have effect [No. V. 11013/2/2007- ME(P - I) ] T. J. S. CHAWLA, Under Secy .

(4)

(2)

(3)

(1)

30 November, 2007 उपभोक्ता मामले, खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

Amendment No. 4 November,

(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

2007

IS4736: 1986-Speci- fication for Hot- Dip Zinc Coatings on Mild Steel Tubes (First Revision)

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर , 2007

Copy of this Amendment is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata Chandigarh , Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati, Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

का.आ. 94.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) ,के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( कों) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गए हैं:-

[Ref. MTD24/T-90] अनुसूची

Dr. (Mrs.) SNEH BHATLA, Sc. ' F ' & Head (MTD) क्रम भारतीय मानक(कों)

नई दिल्ली, 4 जनवरी , 2008

सं.

संशोधन की तिथि

की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

संशोधनकी संख्या और तिथि

(2)

(1)

(4)

(3)

का. आ. 95. - भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक(कों) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :-

1. आइएस 4736 : 1986

30 नवम्बर 2007

संशोधन संख्या 4 नवम्बर

अनुसूची

मृदु इस्पात नलिकाओं पर तप्त निमज्जी जस्ता लेपन- 2007

विशिष्टि( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि

क्रम संशोधित भारतीय संख्या, मानक( कों) की 'संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक

(2)

(3)

(4)

(1)

01 नवम्बर , 2007 02-01-2008

1. आईएस 15652 :

इस मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9, बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नईदिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

2006 , विद्युत प्रयोजनों के लिए विद्युतरोधी

[संदर्भ : एम.टी.डी. 24/टी-90 ]

मैट-विशिष्टि

डा. स्नेह भाटला , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी)

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department ofConsumerAffairs)

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS New Delhi , the 24th December, 2007

इस संशोधन की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुरशाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110 002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: ईटी 02/टी-154 ]

पी. के. मुखर्जी , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी) S.O. 94. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub- rule (1) of 7 Rule of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that 166

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 4th January , 2008

S.Q. 95. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued :

SCHEDULE .

No and year of the Indian Standards

Sl . No.

No. and year of the amendment

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

(1)

(3)

(4)

02-01-2008

01November , 2007

IS15652 : 2006 Insulating Matsfor Electrical Purposes-Specification

Copy of this Amendment is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad , Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref. ET 02/T- 154 ]

P. K. MUKHERJEE, Sc . 'F ' & Head (Electrotechnical)

नई दिल्ली , 7 जनवरी , 2008

का आ. 96. - भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं : -

अनुसूची

क्रम संख्या संशोधित भारतीय मानक( कों ) की संख्या और वर्ष

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

आई एस 12634 : 1989

1दिसम्बर , 2007

31दिसम्बर, 2007 2.

आई एस 13047 : 1991

31.दिसम्बर , 2007

1 दिसम्बर , 2007

इन भारतीय संशोधन की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुरशाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110 002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा 'कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना , पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[ संदर्भ: सीईडी/राजपत्र]

ए. के. सैनी , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी )

New Delhi , the 7th January, 2008

S.O. 96. In pursuance of clause ( b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

No and year of the Indian Standards

Sl. No.

No. and year of the

amendment

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

(1)

(3)

(4)

IS12634: 1989

1December , 2007

31 December , 2007

1.: IS13047: 1991

1 December , 2007

31 December ,2007

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref. CED/Gazette]

A. K. SAINI, Sc . 'F' & Head ( Civil Engg.) 167 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

नईदिल्ली, 7 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 97.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

क्रम

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक( कों ) की संख्या , वर्ष

संख्या और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों , यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

(4) (1)

(2)

(3)

30सितम्बर , 2007 1. आईएस/आईएसओ 1925 : 2001 यांत्रिक कंपन- सन्तुलन शब्दावली

आईएस 13274 : 1992/ आईएसओ 1925 : 1990यांत्रिक कंपन-तुलन-शब्दावली

31अक्तूबर , 2007 2. आईएस/आईएसओ 5344 : 2004 विद्युत गतिक कंपन जनित्र प्रणाली कार्यकारिता अभिलक्षण (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

आईएस/आईएसओ 5344 : 1980 विकंपन उत्पन्न करने के लिए विद्युत - गतिकीय परीक्षण उपस्कर- उपस्कर के लक्षण बताने की पद्धतियां

31अक्तूबर , 2007

आईएस 14730 : 2000/आईएसओ 5982 : 1981 कंपन और प्रधात- मनुष्य के यांत्रिक चालन केन्द्र की प्रतिबाधा

3. आईएस/आईएसओ 5982 : 2001 यांत्रिक कंपन और शॉक-उर्ध्वाधर कंपन के अंतर्गत बैठी स्थिति में शरीर अनुक्रिया अभिलक्षणों को अंकित करने हेतु आदर्शकृत भागों की रेंज

30नवम्बर, 2007

आईएस/आईएसओ 5349 : 1986 यांत्रिक कंपन-मानव शरीर में हाथ के माध्यम से हुए विकम्पन के मापन और मूल्यांकन के मार्गदर्शी सिद्धांत

4. आईएस/आईएसओ 5349-1 : 2001 यांत्रिक कंपन- हस्त संचरित कंपन का मानव पर प्रभाव का मापन गैर मूल्यांकन : भाग 1 सामान्य अपेक्षाएं ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

30नवम्बर , 2007

आईएस/आईएसओ 5349 : 1986 यांत्रिक कंपन- मानव शरीर में हाथ के माध्यम से हुए विकम्पन के मापन और मूल्यांकन के मार्गदर्शी सिद्धांत

5. आईएस/ आईएसओ 5349-2 : 2001 यांत्रिक कंपन- हस्त संचरित कंपन का मानव पर प्रभाव का मापन और मूल्यांकन : भाग 2 कार्यस्थलों पर मापन की व्यावहारिक मार्गदर्शिका ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

31अक्तूबर , 2007 6. आईएस/आईएसओ 7475 : 2002 यांत्रिक कंपन- संतुलन मशीनें-मापन स्टेशन के लिए अहाते और अन्यसंरक्षी उपाय

आईएस 14734 : 1999/आईएसओ 7475 : 1984 संतुलन मशीन- आवेष्टन और अन्य सुरक्षा उपाय

31 अक्तूबर , 2007 7. आईएस/आईएसओ 10055 : 1996 यांत्रिक कंपन- शिपबोर्ड के उपस्करों और मशीनरी के घटकों की कंपन परीक्षण अपेक्षाएं

30नवम्बर , 2007

आईएस 3615 : 1967 प्रशीतन और वातानुकूलन संबंधी शब्दावली

8. आईएस 3615 : 2007 प्रशीतन और वातानुकूलन सम्बन्धी शब्दावली ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

31अक्तूबर , 2007 9. आईएस/आईएसओ 7131 : 1997 मिट्टी उठाने की मशीनरी-लोडर- शब्दावली और व्यापारिक विशिष्टियां

आईएस 11114 ( भाग 4 ) : 1993/ आईएसओ 7131 : 1984 मिट्टी उठाने की मशीनरी आयामों और सूचकों की परिभाषाएं; भाग 4 लोडर- शब्दावली और व्यापारिक विशिष्टियां

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना, पुणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : एम.ई.डी./जी-2 : 1 ]

सी. के. वेदा , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख (यांत्रिक इंजीनियरिंग ) 62G1/08-2 168

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 7th January,2008

S.O. 97. In pursuance of clause ( b) of sub- rule ( 1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standard Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars ofwhich are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Sl . No.

Date of Established No. & Year of the Indian Standards Established

No. & year of Indian Standards , ifany, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(1)

(3)

(4)

30September, 2007 1. IS/ISO 1925 : 2001 Mechanical vibration- balancing -Vocabulary

IS 13274 : 1992/ISO 1925 : 1990 Mechanical vibration-balancing- Vocabulary

31October , 2007 2. IS/ISO 5344: 2004 Electrodynamic vibration generating systems- Performance characteri- stics ( First Revision)

IS/ISO 5344 : 1980 Electrodynamic test equipment for generating Vibration-Method of describing equipment characteristics

31October, 2007 3. IS/ISO 5982 : 2001 Mechanical vibration and shock-Range of idealized values to charac- terize seated-body biodynamic response under vertical vibration

IS 14730 : 2000/ISO 5982 : 1981 vibration and shock-Mechanical driving point impedance ofthe human body

30November , 2007 4. IS/ISO 5349-1 : 2001 Mechanical vibration- Measurement and evaluation of human exposure to hand - transmitted vibration; Part 1 General requirements (First revision)

IS/ISO 5349 : 1986 Mechanical vibration-Guidelines for measure- ment and the assessment of human exposure to hand -trans- mitted vibration

30November, 2007

IS/ISO 5349 : 1986 Mechanical vibration Guidelines for measure- ment and the assessment of human exposure to hand -trans- mitted vibration

5. IS/ISO 5349-2: 2001 Mechanical vibration- Measurement and evaluation of human exposure to hand- Transmitted vibration ; Part 2 Practical guidance for measurement at the workplace (First revision)

31October , 2007

IS 14734 : 1999/ISO 7475 : 1984 Balancing machines-Enclosures and other safety measures

6. ISISO 7475 : 2002 Mechanical vibration- Blancing machines- Enclosures and other protective measures for the measuring station

31 October, 2007 7. IS/ISO 10055 : 1996 Mechanical vibration- Vibration testing requirements for ship- board equipment and machinery components

30November, 2007 8. IS3615 : 2007 Glossary of terms used in refrigeration and air conditioning ( First Revision)

IS3615 : 1967 Glossary of terms used in refrigeration and air conditioning

31October , 2007 9. IS/ISO 7131 : 1997 Earth -moving machinery Loaders-Terminology and commercial specifications

IS 11114 (Part 4) : 1993 /ISO7131 : 1984 Earth moving machinery- Definition of dimensions and symbols; Part 4 Loaders- Terminology and commerical specifications (First revision)

Copy of these Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref. MED/G-2: 1 ]

C. K. VEDA, Sc . ' F' & Head ( Mechanical Engineering) 169 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19, 2008/पौष 29, 1929

नई दिल्ली , 9: जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 98.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड (ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है , वह स्थापित हो गया है:-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम संख्या

स्थापित भारतीय मानक( कों ) की संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

31दिसम्बर , 2007 1. आईएस 15800 2007 गुणता प्रबन्ध पद्धतियां- जनता को सेवा देने वाले संगठनों द्वारा गुणता सेवा देने हेतु मार्गनिर्देश

इस संशोधन की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पुणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : एम एस डी/जी-8 अधिसूचना]

पी. भटनागर , वैज्ञानिक ' ई ' एवं प्रमुख ( प्रबन्ध एवं तंत्र)

New Delhi , the 9th January, 2008

S.O. 98. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been established on the date, indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Date of Established

Sl . No. No. and year of the Indian Standard Establsihed

No. and year of Indian Standard, if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(3)

(4)

(1)

31 December , 2007

IS 15800: 2007 Quality Management Systems-Guidelines for Service Qualityby Public Service Organizations

Copyofabove Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 , Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi- 110002 and its Regional Offices at Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices atAhmedabad, Bangaluru , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: MSD/G- 8 Notification]

P. BHATNAGAR, Scientist ' E' & Head (MSD)

नई दिल्ली , 14 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 99.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड (ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा

संशोधित भारतीय मानक (कों) की संख्या, वर्ष

क्रम संख्या और शीर्षक

अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हों , की संख्या और वर्ष

(2)

(3)

(4)

(1)

31दिसम्बर , 2007 आईएस 15791 : 2007 , संग्रहालय प्लाईवुड -विशिष्टि 170

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुरशाह जफर मार्ग , मई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : सीईडी/राजपत्र] ए. के. सैनी , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' व प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी )

New Delhi , the 14th January, 2008 .

$ .O. 99. In pursuance of clause ( b) of sub - rule (1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been established on the date indicated against each :

Sl. No. No. and year of the Indian Standards Established

(1)

(2)

1 IS15791 : 2007 Museum Plywood- Specification

SCHEDULE

Date ofEstablished

No. and year of Indian Standards , if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(3)

(4)

31December, 2007

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002 and its Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: CED/Gazette] A. K. SAINI , Scientist ' F' & Head ( Civil Engineering)

नई दिल्ली , 15 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 100.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के नियम 4 के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं : -

नवम्बर 2007 में स्वीकृत किये गये अनुज्ञप्ति

लाइसेंस संख्या

क्रम सांख्या

लाइसेंसी का नाम तथा पता

(2)

(1)

(3)

7793605

हरिओम ज्वैलर्स,

लिम्बूपोल, रतन पोल, अहमदाबाद-380001 2

7793706

बाबूभाईज्वैलर्स,

जी13 , पुजेर काम्पलैक्स , गोल्डन सिल्वर अपार्टमेंट के सामने , सुभनपुरा , बड़ोदा-390023 3

7793807

मुक्तानंद आर्ट ज्वैलर्स, 12/17/72; अशोक स्तम्भ के सामने , टावर बाजार , आनंद 388001 4

7794001

अरबुडाज्वैलर्स, जावेरी बाज़ार , स्टेशन रोड, मेहसाना-384001

अनुसूची

अनुज्ञप्तिस्वीकृत करने की तिथि उत्पाद का नाम तथा आई एस

(5) (4)

02-11-2007 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहारांकन आई एस 1417 : 1999

02-11-2007 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों /शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहारांकन आई एस 1417 : 1999 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

171

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19, 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

(2)

(1).

7793504

सोनलज्वैलरी प्रा. लि. , 301-303 , पोडर प्लाजा, फायर स्टेशन के सामने, गोड डोड रोड, सूरत-395 001 6

7793908

सोनीदिलीपकुमार , गुणवंतीलाल , 365/1 , चैनलाओल , मानक चौक , अहमदाबाद 7

7792195

श्री धनुषधारी मा बिवरेइज , डी/65/ 5/बी, डायमंड पार्क, जी आई डी सी, नरोडा, अहमदाबाद 8

7794506

शीलाभद्र केबल , 164/बी, साबरमती इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , गुरूकुल स्टोरेज के पास , साबरमती , अहमदाबाद 7795306

सोनी राजेन्द्राकुमार ठाकोरलाल , मोती बाजार चौक , पालनपुर, बंसकांटा 385 001 10

7795407.

नक्षत्रज्वैलर्स, 1 वाईट हाउस , पैलेस रोड, ग्राउंड फ्लोर , पालनपुर , बंनसकाटा 385 001 11

7796106

कन्यादान ज्वैलर्स, कारोडिया पोल कृष्णा , शेरी घडीयाल पोल , एम जी रोड, बडोदा 12

7796914

विनारज्वैलर्स, 21 वृंदावन काम्पलैक्स, सुभाष चौक के पास, गुरूकुल रोड, मेमनगर, अहमदाबाद 13

7797007

शिवमज्वैलर्स , 884 गुजरात हाउसिंग बोर्ड, शिवशक्ति सोसाइटी , सैक्टर 27 , ब्लाक नंबर 884 , गांधीनगर-382 028 7796005

कन्यादानज्वैलर्स, कारोडिया पोल कृष्णा शेरी , घडीयाली पोल, एम जी रोड, बड़ोदा 7794304

लिंबानी इंजिनियरिंग, सर्वे नंबर 313 , शिला आर्ट्स फैक्टरी के पास, राजचन्द्रा मंदिर के सामने , गैलेक्सीसिनेमा रोड, " नरोडा, अहमदाबाद 7795205

पार्थ इंडस्ट्रीज , 17 , साईनाथ एस्टेट , 105/106, जी आई डी सी प्लाट , भगवती फाउंडरी केसामने, ओढ़व , अहमदाबाद 382415

(4) (3)

02-11-2007 चांदी एवं चांदी मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहारांकन आई एस 2112 : 2003

01-11-2007 पैकेजबंद पेयजल 14543:2004

06-11-2007 पी वी सी इंसूलेटिड केबल आई एस 694 : 1990

06-11-2007 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहारांकन आई एस 1417 : 1999

01-11-2007 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 1417 : 1999

12-11-2007 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 1417 : 1999

14-11-2007 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 1417 : 1999

14-11-2007 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 1417 : 1999

12-11-2007 चांदी एवं चांदी मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 2112 : 2003

06-11-2007 सबमर्सिबल पम्पसैट आई एस 8034 : 2002

08-11-2007 पम्प: रिजैनरेटिव ओर क्लीयर , कोल्डवाटर आई एस 8472 : 1998 172

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/ PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5) 17

7794203

06-11-2007

ओपनवैल सबमर्सिबल पम्पसैट आई एस 14220 : 1994

डैनिम पम्प, 9 , नीलकंठ एस्टेट, मधुसूदन टैक्सटाईल मिल के सामने , बापूनगर रोड, अहमदाबाद-380024

18 : 7794405

06-11-2007

ओपनवैल सबमर्सिबल पम्पसैट आई एस 14220 : 1994

अवधदूत इंजीनियरिंग इंडस्ट्रीज , 47/1, जी आई डी सी , विसनगर (उत्तर गुजरात ) मेहसाना-384 315

: 7796712

13-11-2007

पी वी सी इंसूलेटिड केबल आई एस 694 : 1990

मैसर्स यूनीफलैक्स केबल लिमिटेड , 158-162 , जी आई डी सी, अंबर गाँव , वलसाद-396 171

7795913

12-11-2007

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों /शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 1417 : 1999

मैसर्स अनमोल ज्वैलर्स , शॉप नंबर 1 , जी एफ स्वपनिल रिगैंसी, नारायणपुरा चार रस्ता, अहमदाबाद

7797209

15-11-2007 मैसर्स अग्रवाल , ज्वैलर्स मेन बाजार , दंता, बनसकांटा-385 120

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 1417 : 1999

7797310

15-11-2007 लीलावतीज्वैलर्स , 15 , सुपर मार्केट , बस स्टेशन के पीछे, लानावाडा, पंचमहल

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 1417 : 1999

23:

7797714

19-11-2007

पी वी सी इंसूलेटिड ( एच डी ) केबल आई एस 1554( पार्ट 1 ) : 1988

धुमी केबल इंडस्ट्रीज , 26 , कमल को ओप इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, सुखरामनगर के पास , आजोड, डेरी रोड, रखियाल , अहमदाबाद-380 023

$7798211

01-11-2007

ओटोमोटिव विहीकल न्यूमैटिक टायर फार टू तथा श्री वीलड मोटर विहीकल आई 15627

इनोवेटिव टायर तथा टयूब , 42ए, पुरूषोतम नगर , उर्मी चार रस्ता के पास , डाक्टर कदम हास्पिटल के सामने , बी पी सी रोड

25.

7798413

23-11-2007

ओपलवैल सबमर्सिबल पम्पसैट आई 14220 : 1994

उजस इंडस्ट्रीज , 40/41, अंबा एस्टेट , विनजोल पाटिया के पास , महमदाबाद रोड , अहमदाबाद

7799213

28-11-2007 अवधदूत इंजीनियरिंग इंडस्ट्रीज , 47/1, जी आई डी सी, विसनगर (उत्तर गुजरात ) मेहसाना-384 315

पम्प-रीजैनरेटिव ऑर क्लीयर कोल्डवाटर आई एस 8472 : 1998

7799314

28-11-2007

सबमर्सिबल पम्पसेंट आई 80342002

गायत्री इंजीनियरिंग , विश्वकर्मा एस्टेट, गोल्डन ट्रांसपोर्ट के सामने , एन एच नंबर 8 , नरोडा रोड, अहमदाबाद

[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ]

ए. के. तलवार , उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर) 173

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29, 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

New Delhi , the 15th January, 2008

S.O. 100. In pursuance ofsub- regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Licence Granted for the Month of November 2007

Licensee Name

LicenceNo.

S. No.

(2)

(3)

(1)

7793605

Hari Om Jewellers Limbu Pole Ratan Pole, Ahmedabad-380001 2

7793706

Babubhai Jewellers G/13 Pujer Complex, Opp Golden SilverApartment, Subhanpura, Vadodara-390023 3

7793807

Muktanand Art Jewellers 12/17/72 , Opp Ashok Stambha Tower Bazar, Anand-388001 4

7794001

Arbuda Jewellers , Zaveri Bazar, Station Road, Mehsana-384001

7793504

Sonal Jewellery Pvt . Ltd. , 301-303, PoddarPlaza, Opp FireStation, Ghod Dod Road, Surat-395001 6

7793908

Soni Dilipkumar Gunvntilal , 365/1 , Chanllaole, Manek Chowk, Ahmedabad 7792195

Shree Dhanushdhari Maa Beveroges , D/65/5 /B , Diamond Park, GIDC, Naroda, Ahmedabad 8

7794506

Shalibhadra Cables , 164/B , Sabarmati Ind. Estate , Near Gurukul Storage, Sabarmati , Ahmedabad 7795306

Soni Rajendra Kumar Thakorlal, Moti Bazar Chowk, Palanpur , Banaskantha- 385001 7795407

Nakshatra Jewellers , 1, White House Palace Road , Ground Floor, Palanpur , Banaskantha- 385001

DateofGOL Product & IS No.

(5) (4)

02-11-2007 Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts -Fineness andMarking IS 1417: 1999

02-11-2007 Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness andMarking IS 1417 : 1999

02-11-2007 Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts-Fineness andMarking IS 1417: 1999

02-11-2007 Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness andMarking IS 1417 : 1999

02-11-2007 Silver and Silver Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness andMarking IS2112: 2003

02-11-2007 Silver and Silver Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness andMarking IS2112 : 2003

01-11-2007 Packaged Drinking Water IS 14543 : 2004

06-11-2007 PVC Insulated Cables IS694: 1990

06-11-2007 Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts -Fineness andMarking IS 1417: 1999

01-11-2007 Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness andMarking IS 1417: 1999 174

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/ PAUSA 29 , 1929

(1)

(2)

(3)

7796106

Kanyadan Jewellers , Karodia Pole Krishna Sheri Ghadiali Pole , MG Road, Vadodar

7796914

Vinar Jewellers , E- 21 , VrundavanComplex, Near Subhash Chowk, Gurukul Road, Memnagar , Ahmedabad 7797007

Shivam Jewellers , 884, Gujarat Housing Board , Shivshakti Society, Sector -27, Block No- 884 , Gandhinagar - 382028

7796106

Kanyadan Jewellers , Karodia Pole, Krishna Sheri Ghadiali Pole, MG Road, Vadodar

7794304

Limbani Engineering, Survey No. 313 , NR, Shila Ice Factory, Opp . Rajchandra Temple , Galaxy Cinema Road, Naroda, Ahmedabad 16

7795205

Parth Industries , 17 , Sainath Estate, 105/106 , GIDC Plot, Opp . Bhagvati Foundary , Odhav, Ahmedabad- 382415 7794203

Denim Pumps , 9, Nilkanth Estate , Opp . Madhusudan Textille Mills , Bapunagar Road , Ahmedabad- 380024 18

7794405

Avadhoot Engineering Industries, 47/1 , G.I.D.C. Visnagar (Uttar Gujarat) Mehsana, 384315

7796712

M/ sUniflex Cables Limited , 158-162 , GIDC , Umbergaon , Valsad396171

7795912

M/sAnmol Jewels , Shop No 1 , GF , Swapnil Regancy, Near Naranpura Char Rasta , Ahmedabad

7797209

M/s. Agarwal , Jewellers , Main Bazar , Danta , Banaskantha-385120 22

7797310

Lilavati Jewellers , 15, Super Market, B /H Bus Station, Lanawada , Panchmahal i

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] (4)

(5)

12-11-2007 GoldandGoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts - Fineness andMarking IS 1417: 1999

14-11-2007 Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness andMarking IS 1417: 1999

14-11-2007 Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness andMarking IS 1417 : 1999

12-11-2007 Silver and Silver Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness andMarking IS 2112 : 2003

06-11-2007 Submersible Pumpsets IS 8034 : 2002

08-11-2007 Pumps- Regenerative or clear , cold water- Specification IS 8472: 1998

06-11-2007 Openwell Submersible Pumpsets- Specification IS 14220 : 1994

06-11-2007 Openwell Submersible Pump IS 14420 : 1994

13-11-2007 PVC Insulated Cables IS694: 1990

12-11-2007 Gold andGoldAlloys, Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness andMarking IS 1417: 1999

15-11-2007 GoldandGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking IS 1417 : 1999

15-11-2007 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness andMarking IS 1417:1999 175

भारत का राजपत्र : बनवरी 19, 2008/पौष 29, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

(3)

(1)

(2)

7797714

Drumi Cable Industries, 26, Kamal Co.op Industrial Estate, Nr Sukhramnagar, Ajod DairyRoad, Rakhial , - Ahemdabad 380023 24

7798211

Innovative Tyres and Tubes, 42-A, Purshottamnagar, Near Urmi Char Rasta, Opp . Dr. Kadam Hospital , B.P.C. Road 25

7798413

Ujash Industries, 40/41 , Amba EstateNear Vinjol Patiya, Mahemdabad Road, Ahmedabad

7799213

Avadhoot Engineering Industries, 47/1 , G.I.D.C. , Visnagar, (UttarGujarat) Mehsana -384315

7799314

GayatriEngineering , Viswakarma EstateOpp. GoldenTransport, NHNo. 8 , NarodaRoad, Ahmedabad

(5) (4)

19-11-2007 PS Insulated (HD) CablesIS 1554 (Part 1) 1988

01-11-2007 Automotive Vehicles- Pneumatic Tyres for Two and Three-Wheeled Motor Vehicles IS 15627

23/11/2007 Openwell submersible Pumpsets IS14220: 1994

28-11-2007 Pump-Regenerative or clear , coldwater IS 8472: 1998

28-11-2007 Submersible Pumpsets IS8034:2002

[No. CMD/13: 11 ] A. K. TALWAR, Dy. Director General (Marks)

नई दिल्ली , 15 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 101.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम 1988 के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं ( सितम्बर 2007 महीना के लिए )

अनुसूची

भाग अनु. वर्ष

भा.मा. संख्या

भारतीय मानक

काशीर्षक

क्रम लाइसेंस सं सं

स्वीकृत करने की तिथि वर्ष/माह

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

(1)

(2)

(3)

1. 5355062 10-09-07

(5) (4)

1989 455

पोट्रलैंड धातुमल

सीमेंट

मैसर्स मानसरोवर सीमेंट कं. (प्रा. ) लि. कमालपुर , राधानगर रोड, पो.आ. मि. थानि, कुलटी ( पु.स्टे. ) आसानसोल , जिला- वर्धमान-713371 पश्चिम बंगाल 2. 5354565 3-09-07 मैसर्स राधिका ट्रांसमिशन प्रा. लिमि. धुलागड़ इंडस्ट्रियल पार्क सांकराइल , एन एच -6 पो.आ. केन्दुआ, हावड़ा, पश्चिम बंगाल 62G1/08-3

1996

398

शिरोपरि प्रेषणों के लिए एल्यूमीनियम के चालक, जस्तीकृत इस्पात प्रबलित 176

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

(3)

(1)

(2)

3. 5354666 3-09-07 -वही-

4. 5354464 05-09-07 मैसर्स ए.बी. वुडटेक प्रा. लिमिटेड एन टी रोड , वैद्यवाटी, हुगली-712222 पश्चिमबंगाल

10-09-07

5. 5355264

मैसर्स भिनिकैब ( इंडिया ) प्रा.लि. मानिकपुर, हरिनाभी-700148 जिला-24 परगना ( दक्षिण ) , पश्चिम बंगाल

6.. 5355163 10-09-07 मैसर्स चेतक केबिल इंडास्ट्रीज 8 तिलजला रोड , कोलकाता-700046 पश्चिमबंगाल

7. 5356064 27-09-07 मैसर्स सुभीसि पॉलिमार्स 6/3मुसलमानपाड़ा लेन बेलुड़-711202, जिला: हावड़ा,

27-09-07 -वही-

8. 5356165

9. 5357369 20-09-07 मैसर्स जी के प्लास्टिक्स प्राईवेट लिमि. राजहाट दिल्ली रोड, जिला: हुगली-712123 पश्चिमी बंगाल

10. 5357874 05-10-2007

प्रा.लि. 2/3 डॉ आर.एन. टैगोर मैसर्स बालाजी रोटोमोल्डार्स रोड, बेलघरिया , कोलकाता-700076 पश्चिम बंगाल

11. 5357470 01-10-2007 मैसर्स टिमटेक इंडिया प्रा.लि. दिल्लीरोड , बेलु मिल्कि शेउराफुलि जिला- हुगली-712223

12. 5357571

-वही-

01-10-2007

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

(5)

(4)

398

1994

शिरोपरि प्रेषणों के लिए एल्यूमीनियम मिश्रधातु (एल्यूमीनियम-मैग्नीशियम सिलिकॉन टाइप ) के लड़दार चालक

2202

1999

लकड़ीके सपाट दरवाजे के शटर ( ठोस कोर प्रकार) असजाबटी ( बी एन) टाइप बी डब्ल्यूपी ग्रेड

1.990

694

पी बी सी रोधित केबिल 1100 वोल्ट तक कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए

694

1990

पी बी सी रोधित केबिल 1100 वोल्ट तक कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए

2001

14927

वैद्युतीय संस्थापनों के लिए दीवार अथवा सीलिंग पर जड़े जाने हेतु केबिल ट्रॉकिंग व डक्टिंग प्रणाली

1983

9537

बिजली के संस्थापन के लिए नलिकाएं, विद्युत रोधक पदार्थों के सादे दृढ़ नलिकाएं

1992

12818

वेधन/नलकुप के लिए अप्लास्टीकृत पी बी सी के बने स्कीन एवं आवरक पाइप

12701

1996

घूमते हुए साचों में ढले पॉलीएथिलीन के जल संग्रहटेके

1996

भीनियर्ड डेकोरेटिभ प्लाईवुड 1328

2000

5509

अग्निविमंदक प्लाईवुड

[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ] ए. के. तलवार, उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर )

New Delhi , the 15th January, 2008

S.O. 101. In pursuance ofsub -regulation (5) ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule for the month of September 2007.

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii)]

SCHEDULE

Grant Date

Sl. No.

Licences No.

Name & Address oftheparty

I. 5355062 10-09-07 M/s . Mansarovar Cement CompanyPvt . Ltd. Kamalpur , Radhanagar Rd. , P.O. Mithani , Asansol , Bardhawan, West Bengal-713371 3-09-07

2. 5354565

M/s . Radhika Trans- mission Pvt.Ltd. Dhulagarh Industrial Park, Dhulagarh , Sankrail, NH -6, Ρ.Ο. Kendua, Howrah, WestBengal.

3. 5354666

-do-

3-09-07

4. 5354464 5-09-07

M/ s . A.B. Woodtech Pvt.Ltd. N.T. Road, Baidyabati Dist.Hooghly, West Bengal - 712222 10-09-07

5. 5355264

M/s. Vinicab(India) Pvt. Ltd. Manickpur , Harinavi - 700148 Dist. 24 Paragans(South) WestBengal .

10-09-07.

6. 5355163

M/sChetak Cable Industries 8, Tiljala Road, Kolkata-700046, WestBengal .

27-09-07

7. 5356064

M/sSuvishi Polymers 6/3Musalman Para Lane Belur-711202 Dist.Horwah, WestBengal .

-do-

27-09-07

8. 5356165

9. 5357369 20-09-07 M/ s G. K. Plastics Pvt . Ltd. , Rajhat, Delhi Road, Rajhat , Hooghly, WestBengal - 712123

177

Year

Title of the Standard IS No.

Sec.

Part.

1989

Portland Slag Cement 455

1996

Aluminium Conductors 398 galvanized Steel- re- inforced for overhead- transmission purposes .

398

1994

Aluminium alloy (Aluminium- Magnesium-Silicon type) Stranded Conductors for over- head transmission purposes.

2202

1999

Wooden Flush Door Shutters (Solid Core type) Non - decorative (BN) type, BWPgrade

694

1990

PVC Insulated Cables for working voltages upto and including 1100 volts .

694

-do-

1990

14927

2001

Cable Trunking & Ducting Systems intended for Mounting on walls orceiling.

9537

1983

Conduits for electrical installation Rigid Plain Conduits ofinsulating material .

12818

1992

Unplasticized PVC screen and casing pipes forBore/Tubewell .

178

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 2

9 10. 5357874 5-10-07

12701

1996

Rotational moulded Polythylene water storage tanks

M/sBalaji Rotomoulders Pvt. Ltd. 2/3 , Dr. R. N. TagoreRoad, Belghoria Kolkata- 700076 WestBengal .

11. 5357470 1-10-07

1328

1996

Veneered Decorative Plywood

M/sTimtech India Pvt. Ltd. Delhi Road, Belumilki, P. O. Sheoraphully, Distt . Hooghly- 712223 WestBengal .

12. 5357571 1-10-07

5509

2000

FireRetardant

Plywood

M/sTimtech India Pvt. Ltd. Delhi Road , Belumilki, P. O. Sheoraphully, Dist. Hooghly-712223 WestBengal .

[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ]

A. K. TALWAR, Dy. Director General (Marks)

पर्यावरण एवं वन मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 9 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 102. केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम (4) के अनुसरण में पर्यावरण एवं वन मंत्रालय के अधीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों , जिनके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, को अधिसूचित करती है: -

भारतीय वनस्पति सर्वेक्षण , अंडमान निकोबार , परिमण्डल , पोर्ट ब्लेयर ।

2. भारतीय वनस्पति सर्वेक्षण , पश्चिमी परिमण्डल , पुणे ।

[सं. ई-11011 /2/2003 - रा.भा. ( का. ) ]

जय नारायण , निदेशक ( राजभाषा) MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS

New Delhi , the 9th January, 2008

S. O. 102. In pursuance of sub- Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official purpose ofthe union) Rule, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices under the administrative control of the Ministry of Environment & Forests , the 80% staff whereof have acquired a working knowledge ofHindi :-

1. Botanical Survey of India, Andaman & Nicobar Circle , Port Blair .

2 Botanical Survey of India, Western Circle, Pune .

[No. 11011 /2/2003-0 . L. (I) ] JAI NARAIN , Director ( O. L. )

जल संसाधन मंत्रालय

नईदिल्ली , 27 दिसम्बर , 2007

का, आ. 103. केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम (4) के अनुकरण में केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , आर. के. पुरम , नई दिल्ली के निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को , जिसके 80 % कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है: - [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

179

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

1. मध्य महानदी उप -मण्डल- एक, केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , रायपुर ।

2. मुख्य अभियंता, प्रबोधन ( मध्य ) संगठन , केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , नागपुर ।.

3. प्रबोधन निदेशालय , केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , नागपुर ।

4. ऊपरी सीन रिहन्द उपमण्डल , रीवा , केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , मध्य प्रदेश ।

5. मध्य गंगा यमुना उपमण्डल , केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , इलाहाबाद ।

6. मध्य गंगा छोटी सरयू उपमण्डल , केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , वाराणासी ।

7. गोमती निचली शारदा उपमण्डल , केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , लखनऊ ।

8. मध्य गंगा निचली रामगंगा उपमण्डल , केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , बरेली ।

9. मध्य गंगा उपमण्डल , केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , कानपुर ।

10. प्रबोधन एवं मूल्यांकन निदेशालय , केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , शिमला ।

11. प्रबोधन निदेशालय , केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , गांधीनगर ।

12. जल विज्ञानीय प्रेक्षण परिमंडल , केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , गांधीनगर । .

13. प्रबोधन एवं मूल्यांकन निदेशालय , केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , रांची ।

14. निचली राप्ती घाघरा उपमण्डल , केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , गोरखपुर ।

15. अपर शारदा उपमण्डल , केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , उत्तराखंड ।

16. अपर राप्ती उपमण्डल , गोंडा , केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , उत्तर प्रदेश ।

17. ऊपरी गोदावरी मंडल , केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , हैदराबाद ।

18. प्रबोधन एवं मूल्यांकन निदेशालय , केन्द्रीय जल आयोग , लखनऊ ।

[सं 1 /1 /2005-हिन्दी]

राजकुमारी देव , निदेशक ( रा. भा. )

MINISTRY OF WATER RESOURCES

New Delhi , the 27th December , 2007

S. O. 103. In pursuance of sub -Rule (4) of Rule ( 10 ) of the Official Language (use for official purpose ofthe union) The Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of Central Water Commission , the 80 % staffwhereof have aquired working knowledge ofHindi .

1. Middle Mahanadi Sub - Division No.1 , Central Water Commission, Raipur( Chattisgarh).

2. ChiefEngineer , Monitoring (Middle ) Org. , Central Water Commision, Nagpur (Maharashtra) .

3. Monitoring Dte . , Central Water Commission , Nagpur ( Maharashtra).

4. Upper Sone Rihand Sub -Division, Central Water Commisssion , Rewa, Madhya Pradesh.

5. Middle Ganga -Yamuna Sub - Division , Central Water Commission , Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh .

Middle Ganga and Chhoti Saryu Sub - Division, Central Water Commission, Varanasi , Uttar Pradesh .

6. 7. Gomti and Lower Sharda Sub - Division , Central Water Commission , Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh .

8. Middle Ganga and Lower Ram ganga Sub - Division, Centra Water Commission , Bareily; Uttar Pradesh .

9. Middle Ganga Sub - Division , Central Water Commission , Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh.

10.Monitoring and appraisal Directorate, Central Water Commission, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh .

11. Monitoring and appraisal Directorate , Central Water Commission , Gandhi Nagar, Gujarat .

12. Hydrological Observation Sub -Division , Central Water Commission , Gandhi Nagar Gujarat .

13. Monitoring and appraisal Directorate, Central Water Commission, Ranchi , Jharkhand,

14. Lower Rapati Gagra Sub - Divisio , Central Water Commission , Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh.

15. Upper Sharda Sub- Division , Central Water Commission , Haldwani , Uttarkhand .

16. Upper Rapati Sub - Division, Central Water Commission , Gonda, Uttar Pradesh .

17. Upper Godavari Division, Central Water Commission , Hyderabad , Andhra Pradesh .

18. Monitoring and appraisal Directorate , Central Water Commission , Lucknow .

[No. 1/ 1 /2005 -Hindi]

RAJKUMARI DAVE, Director( OL) 180:

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008 /PAUSA 29, 1929

1 पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

गौतम नई दिल्ली, 15 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 104. भारत सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में दादरी - बवाना- नांगल पाइपलाईन परियोजना के माध्ययम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाईन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और भारत सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाईन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता हे कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाईन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , भारत सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाईन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 90 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध कर दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाईन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, श्री रामावतार पाल , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, जी. टी. आई. पी. ए. आर. सी. बिल्डिंग , सेक्टर -16ए , नोएडा, जिला - गौतम बुद्ध नगर-201301 ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेत्र भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

गांव

जिला तहसील

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्र (हेक्टर) 1

गौतम

439

0.0949 'दादरी

सलारपुर

कलान

440

0.2024 बुद्धनगर

0.0079

नाला

0.1777

441

448

0.0154

449

0.1374

451

0.0008

450

0.1510

453

0.0609

454

0.0041

455

0.0054

459

0.1531

458

0.1157

456

0.0114

457

0.1321

529

0.0154

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

0.0155 दादरी सलारपुर 530

कलान

460

0.0189 बुद्धनगर

531

0.1557

532

0.0999

0.0069

533

0.0086

534

0.0540

535

536

0.2495

537

0.0911

0.1578

538

0.0066

539

0.0086

544

0.0166

545

0.0081

551

557

0.1340

556

0.0249

0.0078

558

0.0083

559

0.2362

560

0.0485

553

561

0.1093

562

0.1075

0.0129

563

0.0131

564

0.0011

567

0.2259

568

570

0.0953

3.2083

कुल

पटाडी

0.0339

729

0.1786

734

0.0015

739

0.0036

740

0.0030

741

0.2207

कुल

0.0083 रनोली 32

0.0608 लतिफपुर 35

0.2513

0.0188

मेटल रोड

0.1003

0.0035

0.0504

(कथाना डीस्ट्रीब्यूटर)

मेटल रोड

0.0283

0.1898

गंगा नहर

0.0781

231 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

2 2

दादरी

0.0414

मेटलरोड

गौतम रनोली लतिफपुर

गौतम दादरी

230

0.0358 बुद्धनगर बुद्धनगर

0.0029

0.0264

0.0414

229

228

0.0294

227

0.1191

0.0042

0.0244

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0010

0.0116

0.1229

रेलवे (51)

पक्कारास्ता 0.0297

0.1201

0.3116

0.0086

0.1849

0.1469

0.1313

0.0123

0.0075

2.2032

कुल

0.0171

443

तामोलीपुर

0.8023

433

0.0390

431

0.0067

430

0.0711

375

374

0.1186

373

0.0922

0.0841

372

0.2917

370

0.2286

369

0.0089

368

367

0.2846

366

0.0059

0.0066

358

356

0.0413

0.2064

355

354

0.0066

0.1498

350

0.0923

349

0.1357

348

0.0131

34 कच्चा रास्ता

0.0856

344

343

0.3283

342

0.0065

0.0663

341

0.0620

340

0.0631

339

181 3

337

0.0607 तामोलीपुर

334

0.0220

332

0.0094

333

0.1135

331

0.1642

0.1552

330

0.4334

323

0.0049

324 कच्चा रास्ता

4.2780

कुल

0.0053

912 कच्चा रास्ता

प्यावाली ताजपुर

914

0.2857

911

0.1524

908

0.0082

0.2317

903

902

0.0082

0.1565

901

900

0.1399

899

0.1108

0.0080

898

0.0080

897

896

0.0844

0.2192

892

893

0.0407

894

0.2236

878 (मेटल रोड) 0.0126

0.1292

612

0.0632

613

0.1778

611

0.0202

614

0.1728

610

616

0.1911

617

0.0069

618

0.0069

619

0.2129

0.1105

630

633

0.1804

634

0.0069

635

0.0071

636

0.2080

641

0.2565

646

0.0050

647

0.0048

0.0619

654

655

0,2485

656

0.0117

671

0.0560

670

0.0042

0.0007

675

676

0:0003 182

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

2 1

1 2

669

0.0156

गौतमं दादरी

दादरी

गौतम प्यावाली ताजपुर

668

0.0156

बुद्धनगर

657

0.2022

659

0.1474

660

0.0060

661

0.1992

662

0.1539

663

0.1846.

664

0.0300

665

0.0232

666

0.0105

4.8270

कुल

0.0089

866

जैतवारपुर नवारपुर

803

0.2583

802

0.1786

801

0.2297

799

0.0009

798

0.0972

0.0239

793 (मेटल रोड )

779

0.0471

0.0058

777

776

0.2459

775

0.1169

774

0.1954

0.1374

773

772

0.1380

0.1239

771

770

0.1835

157

0.0982

756

0.0812

755

0.1617

0.0090

754

0.0090

753

752

0.3791

2.7296

कुल

0.2033

अकलपुर जागीर 287

0.0139

286

0.3690

277

274

0.17 53

0.1755

273

0.0108

272

268

0.1404

0.0030

269

267 ( कच्चा रास्ता) 0.0131

0.6272

[ PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

0.2373

75 .

अकलपुर जागीर

0.1657

0.1414

2.2759

कुल

0.2114

654

सादीपुर छिदोली

663

0.0053

664

0.1218

665

0.0880

667

0.1212

0.0073

668

669

0.0062

0.1604

670

672

0.1483

672/742

0.0078

673

0.0006

681

0.0031

682

0.0138

0.0302

683

0.0179

पयावली

माइनोर

0.0135

653

0.0760

605

0.3350

604

0.0247

603

602

0.1127

601

0.0121

0.0019

592

0.0156

588

0.0568

589

590

0.0128

591

0.0030

587

0.1169

586

0.0630

585

0.0575

0.0079

582

0.2595

581

580

0.1739

0.0076

572

570

0.0025

0.0076

571

569

0.3609

0.0054

568

0.0049

567

0.0105

442

0.0498

563 [ भाग II--खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

183

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19, 2008 /पौष 29, 1929

0.0028 गौतम दादरी

SCHEDULE

District Tehsil

सादीपुर छिदोली 562

बुद्धनगर

सिकंदराबाद डिस्ट्रीब्यूटरी

472

0.0339

465

0.0014

468

0.0030

0.0048

442

Village Survey No.

Area tobe acquired for ROU (inHectares) 3

439

0.0949

Gautam Dadri

471

0.0030

Budh-

0.1419

nagar

0.2801

0.0074

0.1176

0.1301

0.0094

0.0102

0.3330

0.0022

0.0105

0.0073

0.0176.

0.3919

4.2435

कुल

[फा. सं. एल-14014/27/07-जी.पी. ]

एस. बी. मंडल, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS New Delhi, the 15th January, 2008

S.O. 104. Whereas it appears to the Government of India that it is necessary in public interest that for trans- portation of natural gas through Dadri - Bawana-Nangal pipeline project in the state of Uttar Pradesh , a pipeline should be laidby GAIL ( India) Limited;

And, whereas it appears to the Government of India that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification .

Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) ofSection 3 ofthe Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines(Acquisition ofRight of User in Land) Act, 1962, (50 of 1962) the Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date ofwhich the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 ofthe said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Ramavtar Pal , Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, GTI , PARC Building, Plot No. 24, Sector - 16A , Noida, Distt. Gautam Budh Nagar-201301 (U.P. )

62G1 /08-4

Salarpur

440

Kalan.

0.2024

Nalla

0.0079

441

0.1777

448

0.01 54

449

0.1374

451

0.0008

450

0.1510

453

0.0609

454

0.0041

0.0054

455

459

0.1531

458

0.1157

456

0.0114

457

Ο. 1321

529

0.0154

530

0.0155

0.0189

460

0.1557

531

0.0999

532

0.0069

533

0.0086

534

0.0540

535

0.2495

536

0.0911

537

0.1578

538

0.0066

539

544

0.0086

0.0166

545

551

0.0081

0.1340

557

556

0.0249

0.0078

558

0.0083

559

0.2362

560

0.0485

553

0.1093

561

562

0.1095

0.0129

563

0.0131

564

0.0011

567

0.2259

568

570

0.0953

Total 3.2083 184

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 1

5 Gautam Dadri Patadi

729

0.0339

367

0.2846

Gautam Dadri

Tamolipur

Budha-

0.1786

734

Budh-

366

0.0059

0.0015

739

nagar

358

0.0066

nagar

740

0.0036

356

0.0413 741

0.0030

0.2064

355

Total

0.2207

354

0.0066

350

0.1498

0.0083

Ranoli Latifpur 32

349

0.0923 35

0.0608

348

0.1357

0.2513

0,0131

347 (Cart

0.0188

Track

(MetalRoad)

344

0.1003

0.0856 40

0.0035

343

0.3283 26

0.0504

342

0.0065

0.0663 (Kathana

341

340

0.0620 Distributory)

0.0283

(MetalRoad)

339

0.0631 46

0.1898

337

0.0607 GANGA

334

0.0220 NAHER

0.0094

332

231

0.0781

333

Ο. 1135

0.0414

(MetalRoad)

331

0.1642 230

0.0358

330

0.1552 47

0.0029

323

0.4334 48

0.0264

0.0049

324(C.T. )

229

0.0414

4.2780 228

0.0294

TOTAL

0.1191

227

Pyawali Tajpur 912 (C.T. ) 0.0053 53

0.0042

914

0.2857

0.0244

(CartTrack)

911

0.1524 49

0.0010

908

0.0082 50

0.0116

903

0.2317

0.1229

Railway(51)

902

0.0082

0.0297

Asphal-

0.1565

901

TedRoad

900

0.1399 23

0.1201

899

0.1108 22

0.3116

898

0.0080 21

0.0086

897

0.0080

0.1849

896

0.0344

0.1469

0.2192

0.1313

892

0.0123

0.0407

893

0.0075

894

0.2236

0.0126

878

Total

2.2032

(MetalRoad)

443

0.0171

Dadri Tamolipur

0.1292

612

433

0.8023

613

0.0632 431

0.0390

611

0.1778 430

0.0067

614

0.0202 375

0.0711

610

0.1728 374

Ο. 1186

616

0.1911 373

0.0922

617

0.0069 372

0.0841

370

618

0.0069

0.2917

619

0.2129 369

0.2286

630

0.1105 368

0.0089 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

185

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19, 2008/पौष 29, 1929

1 1

0.1804 2

0.2033

Gautam Dadri

Gautam Dadri Pyawali Tajpur 633

0.0069 Budh-

634

635

0.0071 nagar

0.2080

636

0.2565

641

0.0050

646

0.0048.

647

0.0619

654

0.2485

655

0.0117

656

0.0560

671

0.0042

670

0.0007

675

0.0003

676

0.0156

669

0.0156

668

657

0.2022

0.1474

659

660

0.0060

661

Ο. 1992

662

Ο. 1539

663

Ο. 1846

664

0.0300

0.0232

665

0.0105

666

4.8270

Total

0.0089 Jaitwapur 866

0.2583

803

Navarpur

802

0.1786

0.2297

801

0.0009

799

0.0972

798

793 Metal0.0239

Road

0.0471

779

0.0058

777

0.2459

776

775

0.1169

0.1954

774

773

0.1374

0.1380

772

771

0.1239

0.1835

770

0.0982

757

0.0812

756

755

0.1617

0.0090

754

753

0.0090

0.3791

752

2.7296

Total

Akalpur Jagir 287

286

0.0139

Budh-

0.3690

277

nagar

274

0.1753

0.1755

273

0.0108

272

0.1404

268

0.0030-

269

0.0131

267

(CartTrack)

0.6272

0.2373

0.1657

0.1414

Total 2.2759

0.2114 Sadipur Chhidoli 654

663

0.0053

664

0.1218

665

0.0880

667

0.1212

668

0.0073

0.0062

669

0.1604

670

0.1483

672

0.0078

672/742

673

0.0006

681

0.0031

682

0.0138

683

0.0302

0.0179 PyawliMinor

653

.0.0135

605

0.0760

0.3350

604

603

0.0247

0.1127

602

601

0.0121

592

0.0019

588

0.0156

589

0.0568

590

0.0128

0.0030

591

587

0.1169

586

0.0630

585

0.0575

582

0.0079

.581

0.2595 186

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/ PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

0.1739

Dadri Sadipur Chhidoli 580

Gautam

572

0.0076

Budh-

570

0.0025

nagar

-0.0076

571

0.3609

569

0.0054

568

567

0.0049

442

0.0105

563

0.0498

0.0028

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध कर दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाईन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में , श्री रामावतार पाल , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, जी.टी. आई. पी.ए.आर.सी, बिल्डिंग , सेक्टर-16ए , नोएडा, जिला-गौतम बुद्ध नगर-201301 ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

562(Sikandara- baddist.)

अनुसूची

472

0.0339

गांव

जिला तहसील

465

0.0014

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्र (हेक्टर) 468

0.0030

442

0.0048

1351 0.0151

हापुर हसनपुर लोढा

गाजियाबाद

0.0030

471

1311 0.1278 44

0.1419

1310 0.3213 43

0.2801

1309 0.4950 40

0.0074

1308 0.0171

0.1176

1306 0.3209 41

0.1301

1305 0.2383

0.0094

Sadipur Chhidoli 32

Dadri

1304 0.1728 33

0.0102

1302 0.011.1 25

0.3330

1301 0.1392 26

0.0022

1298 0.1890

0.0105

0.0227

पक्का

0.0073

रास्ता

0.0176

1194 0.03 10 2

0.3919

1195 0.1185

4.2435

Total

1196 0.1888

1200 0.1167

23.9863

GRAND TOTAL

1201 0.0283

1202 0.1254 [F. No. L- 14014/27/07 -GP] S. B. MANDAL, Under Secy.

1203 0.0509

1207 0.2807 नई दिल्ली, 15 जनवरी , 2008

1208 0.0119

1209 0.3997

1210 0.5728

कच्चा 0.0061 काआ. 105.-भारत सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में दादरी - बवाना- नांगल पाइपलाईन परियोजना के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल (इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाईन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

रास्ता

1211 0.0597

1212 0.0991

1213 0.0674 और भारत सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाईन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

1214 0.1009

1215 0.1138

1216 0.0123 अतः अब , भारत सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाईन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग 187 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

87 0.1844

गाजियाबाद गाजियाबाद दिनानाथपुर

0.1545

गाजियाबाद हापुर हसनपुर लोढा 1217

0.3236

पुथी

1218 0.2108

0.0028

0.2762

1220

0.0405

0.0096

1221

81/ब 0.2144

5.1053

कुल

81/अ 0.1600 47

0.2592

गाजियाबाद अरफिपुर

80 0.3007 घ.भ.

0.0845

0.0444

0.0186 45

0.3596

0.0006

0.1080

0.5225

0.0072

0.0099

14.

0.0239

कुल 3.7015 42

0.0158

0.0515 (सर्विस रोड)

गाजियाबाद रघुनाथपुर

83-A 0.1855

0.0571

0.0007

0.4835

25 0.1371

0.0286

0.0572

0.3747

कुल

28 0.3511

0.1214

307

गाजियाबाद पिपलहेडा...

0.0147

306 0.3872 25

0.2258

305 0.1880 24 0.4120

308 0.0073 23 0.1810

299 0.0890

0.0629

298 0.4801

0.0259

कच्चा

297 0.0316 रास्ता

(कच्चा रास्ता) 4

0.9264

296 0.1301

0.0082

292 0.0179 (कच्चा रास्ता)

0.2019

291

3.6523

कुल

287 0.0653 गाजियाबाद दिनानाथ पुर 403/ब 0.0030

0.0250

286/अ

0.4145

403/अ

पुथी

288 0.0090 402 0.01 10

290 0.3426 401 0.0205

289 0.0516

0.1188

388/अ

274 0.0348 387 0.4117

335 0.2969 386 0.0807

284 0.0244 383 0.0027

(कच्चा रास्ता)

0.0102

382

271 0.1968 378 0.4252

270 0.2675

0.2924

379

269 0.0667 374 0.0198

266 0.0183 (ड्रेन)

265 0.0162 107 0.0285

262 0.1061 (ओडीआर रास्ता)

263 0.0096 188

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

0.0094

264

गाजियाबाद

पिपलहेडा

गाजियाबाद गाजियाबाद

250/ब 0.0003

251/अ 0.2109

252-अ 0.1478

252/ब 0.0063

249 0.0084

248 0.0106

247 0.0291

0.1356

246-ब

0.0241

246-अ

244 0.0159

245 0.0094

0.0572

242-अ

0.5069

243

0.0096

238

236 0.0135

235 0.0180

216 0.0490

0.2056

219

217 0.2539

213 0.1645

214 0.0335

215 0.0085

पक्का 0.0273

रास्ता

5.1405

कुल

2719 0.0163

गाजियाबाद दासना

2720 0.0006

देहात

2730 0.1676

2729 0.0102

2728 0.0030

2731 0.2545

2732 0.0024

2723 0.0045

0.2619

2756

0.0247

2757

2758 0.0078

0.0057

2629

2620 0.0306

2630 0.0095

2631 0:0120

2667 0.3978

0.0092

2650

2649 0.0461

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

2643 0.0557 दासना

गाजियाबाद

0.2369

2641

देहात

2651 0.0182

2652 0.0193

2640 0.1562

2639 0.0073

2654 0.1128

0.0122

2656

2575 0.0299

2576 0.0657

2577 0.4185

2590 0.0073

2589 0.1360

2588 0.0876

2587 0.0785

0.0900

2586

0.4301

2582

2500 0.0556

2331 0.0508

2583 0.0067

2584 0.0070

2506 0.0221

2505 0.0570

2504 0.0360

2503 0.1262

2501 0.0277

2502 0.0051

2503 0.0244

2329 0.0487

2019/ 0.0422

स्टेटहाइवे

2020/ 0.0664

स्टेट हाइवे

2021/ 0.0287

स्टेटहाइवे

1996 0.0465

0.0230

1991

1992 0.0277

1995 0.0826

1994 0.0635

1982 0.0385

1999 0.0053

2000 0.0050

1992 0.0431

2001 0.3064

2003 0.2815 189

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29, 1929 .

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

5 2

0.0217

गाजियाबाद गाजियाबाद दासना देहात 2004

540 0.0578

गाजियाबाद गाजियाबाद मसुरी

2005 0.0256

(जारी)

0.0578

कुल

2006 0.0829

0.3019

1358

कुशालिया

2007 0.0335

1357 0.2367

0.0096

2008

0.0374

1356

2009 0.0092

1355 0.0083 2011 0.3082

1338 0.4652 2013 0.1030

1341 0.0151

0.0179

1833/

1342 0.0124 रेलवे

1350 0.0046

0.0214

1832/

1349 0.1675 रेलवे

1343 0.1911 1831/ 0.0518

1336 0.0024 रेलवे

1335 0.0253 1824 0.1160

1334 0.0170 1823 0.1368

1329 0.2156 1818 0.0292

1330 0.0143 1817 0.0517

1331 0.4100

0.0070

1814

1325 0.0197 1813 0.0105

1324 0.0064 1811 0.0657

1323/1 0.2865 1812 0.0595

1322 0.1125 1810 0.0269

1312 0.0095 1-809 0.1543

0.4123

1311/1

1808 0.1584

1310 0.0130

0.0849

1807

1309 0.1867 1793 0.0225

1308 0.0175 1794 0.0110

1264 0.0120 1795 0.1548

1263 0.2657 नाला 0.0191

1157 0.0530 1792 0.0910

1156 0.0662 1791 0.0110

1154 0.0426 1784 0.0038

(मेटल रोड)

0.0274

रास्ता

0.1234

153

1783 0.0336

1159 0.1972 1782 0.1402

1152 0.0836 1780 0.2752

1151 0.0354 1777 0.0733

1160 0.0636 1776 0.0419

1150 0.1601 1775 0.0211

1147 0.0530

0.0092

1774

0.2292

1148मि

0.0024

1071

1141 0.0338 1072 0.0011

(कच्चा रास्ता)

0.0003

1773

1136 0.1188 1781 0.0301

1135 0.0953

7.3088

कुल 190

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 19, 2008 /PAUSA 29 , 1929

0.0310 गाजियाबाद

कुशालिया

गाजियाबाद

1134

(जारी) (कच्चा रास्ता)

1131 0.1886

1130 0.1382

1129 0.0292

707 0.0307

(ड्रेइन )

706 0.0232

704 0.1947

705 0.0176

703 0.0174

702 01326

701 0.0002

687 0.2947

700 0.0592

699 0.3685

698 0.6351

618 0.1599

616 0.1740

615 0.1342

614 0.0026

604 0.0925

605 0.0482

603 0.1645

602 0.1657

601 0.1042

600 0.0228

599 0.1631

8.3710

कुल

मातियाला 83 0.1670

0.0283

0.1952

कुल

1376 0.8064

कनौजा

1373 0.0336

1374 0.0367

0.2865

1372

1352 0.0136

(कच्चा रास्ता)

1353 0.0160

1344 0.6493

1343 0.2471

1333 0.0136

(कच्चा रास्ता)

1319 0.0030 (कच्चा रास्ता)

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

0.0007 कनौजा

गाजियाबाद गाजियाबाद

(जारी)

1321 (नाली)

1322 0.0022

(कच्चा रास्ता)

1327 0.4092

1326 0.0339

1325 0.0096

(नाली)

1323 0.4763

1324 0.0360

1305 0.0071

(नाली)

0.0082

1304 (कच्चा रास्ता)

1289 0.2476

1285 0.1103

0.2550

1286

1284 0.0241

1283 0.0055

0.3015

1282

940 0.0029

(कच्चा रास्ता)

0.0228

791 (रास्ता)

792 0.2120

757 0.0140

741 0.2011

748 0.0212

747 0.2830

746 0.1171

742 0.0020

735 0.2011

743 0.2800

744 0.0261

0.0105

736 (कच्चा रास्ता)

716 0.0008

734 0.0037

730 0.0044

729 0.2089

728 0.2235

725 0.3733

724 0.0205

609 0.4909

608 0.0303

(कच्चा रास्ता) 191

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

1 1

0.0145

गाजियाबाद मोदीनगर

606 02731 गाजियाबाद गाजियाबाद कनौजा

621 0.0543

(जारी)

(रास्ता)

630 0.5494

(ड्रेइन) 0.0238

624 0.1276

627 0.1384

0.0152

(कोमाल)

625 0.0068

626 0.0097

7.9815

कुल

0.1567 मोदीनगर महिऊदीनपुर 503

हिंसाली 502 0.0153

497 0.0246

498 0.1489

499 0.0218

228 0.0198

कच्चा 0.0110

रास्ता

485 0.2038

483 0.0643

484 0.1582

486 0.6414

479 0.0253

476 0.0250

467 0.1761

466 0.0208

465

0.1279

463 0.0935

460 0.0309

462 0.0526

0.1627

461

452 0.1599

453 0.0004

449 0.1281

450 0.0125

0.0002

445

0.2068

447

448 0.0972

0.2087

441

0.0017

442

439 0.0117

438 0.0091

443 0.0147

(आस्फाल्टेड

रास्ता). 62G1/08-5

महिऊदीनपुर 307

0.0161 हिसाली 308

(जारी) 322/अ 0.1730

0.1242

322/ब

326/ 0.2924

0.0389

326/अ

321 0.1317

327 0.1423

337 0.1935

338 0.0012

0.5148

339

357 0.1077

(रेलवे)

343 0.1384

0.0943

342

341 0.1669

0.0067

344

340 0.0273

(केनाल)

0.0007

5.2160

कुल

0.0110 असलतनगर 324

0.3932

314/

केनाल

312 0.5904

0.0349

311

310 0.0499

309 0.0302

317/अ 0.0009

315 0.0480

259/ 0.0960

रास्ता

255 0.0009

0.0012

248

247 0.0002

0.1042

244

0.0252

169/

केनाल

0.0427

167/ केमाल

164/ 0.0167

केनाल

155/ 0.0291 192

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008 /PAUSA 29 , 1929

मोदीनगर

गाजियाबाद

0.0334

केनाल

असलतनगर 154/ (जारी)

144 0.1159

243 0.0485

245 0.0480

242 0.1115

239 0.1586

232 0.1633

233 0.0567

0.0804

231.

0.0686

201

194 0.1047

195 0.1726

196 0.1673

1970.0308

198 0.0001

189/ 0.0273

रास्ता

0.1116

183/

183/अ 0.3903

0.0137

182/अ

182/ 0.1016

180/ 0.0097

फिल्ड

बेनल

179 0.1951

178 0.0071

175/ 0.0171

फिल्ड

चेनल

0.0075

176

174 0.0729

3.7890

185 0.0354

बसन्तपुर

सैलती

0.4150

184

183. 0.0150

0.4965

5.172

0.0103

170

(रास्ता)

0.0596

148

147 0.2314

1.2631

कुल

150 0.0383

शोभापुर

149 0.2044

79 0.0364

80 0.0550

780.0452

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 2

75 0.2435

गाजियाबाद मोदीनगर

0.0222 शोभापुर (जारी)

73 0.0012

0.0854

0.0439

86/ब 0.1251

88 0.0975

0.2715

0.1070

0.0097

0.0628

0.0412

0.0276

0.1183

107 0.0614

0.0218

100

0.0173

103

0.0341

106

0.0707

105

0.0243

0.0120

0.2620

31 0.1354

0.0010

0.0070

2.2834

कुल

418 0.3120 नबीपुर

417 0.0263

421 0.3615

416 0.0004

495 0.3251

494 0.0740

493 0.0059

(कच्चा

रास्ता)

492/अ 0.1730

0.3069

490

0.0115

484

(आस्काल्टेड

रास्ता)

471 0.0082

(आस्फाल्टेड

रास्ता)

469 0.0001

(रास्ता)

472 0.6531

0.0128

(आडीआर

रास्ता) 193 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29, 1929

5 1

गाजियाबाद मोदीनगर

0.0281 29

0.2095

गाजियाबाद मोदीनगर

414ब 0.1320

सुलतानपुर 4143 (जारी)

0.0365

नबीपुर (जारी)

0.2152

4133

(रास्ता)

0.1012

417 0.0226 28

0.0010

4123 0.1272 22 0.0065

0.0863

4183.

0.0018

4: 0.6057

0.0092

4184

30.0203

201 0.0184

0.0116

(रास्ता)

3.2649

कुल

0.0051

0.3872

370

सुलतानपुर

202 (रास्ता)

365 0.0829

0.0047

187

366 0.0072

194 0.0474 367 0.0061

200 0.1942 369 0.1883

199 0.1577 368 0.0001

0.0300

186अ

0.0238

371

198 0.2281 (रास्ता)

372 0.0239

0.6647

197अ

(टीकरी

02219

195

विशाखा)

193 0.0089 373 0.0136

192अ 0.1678

0.1549

191अ

(टीकरी विशाखा)

375 0.0002

0.0008

1914

376 0.0016

0.2040

190

0:4292

377

190 0.0010 378 0.0084

196 0.0094 381ब 0:1629

0.0246

381अ

5.8091

कुल

383 0.1296

0.3585

किसनचंदपुर

382 0.1312

0.3657 384 0.0092

पट्ठी

385 0.0088

15 0.0061 3864 0.1890

0.0867

18 0.0064 3861 0.4768

16 1.3075 396 0.0104

17 0.0161 397 0.3208

409 0.0156

2.1469

कुल

410 0.0440

मनौली 392 0.0146 423अ. 0.0030

393 0.0069 422 0.0006

398 0.1511

0.0107 .

416

0.0044

397

0.1177

416व

400 0.0174

0.1085

415अ

401 0.0105

0.1334

4154

सुल्तानपुर माइनोर 194

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 1

5 गाजियाबाद मोदीनगर

402 0.0101

0.0110

गाजियाबाद मोदीनगर

सुलतान नगर 378

मनौली (जारी)

0.0697 (सुलतानपुर

छज्जुपुर 377

माइनोर)

376 0.0016

(जारी)

403 0.0128

375 0.0379 404 0.1447

374 0.0002 382(636) 0.0375

360 0.0069 383 0.0111

361 0.0750 381 0.2832

362 0.1174 380 0.0123

363 0.0542

0.0247

378

364 0.1441 379 0.2228

353 0.0513 386 0.0155

366 0.1205

0.9795

कुल

341 0.0097

0.0141

सुलतान नगर 616

(ड्रेइन)

0.1533

छज्जुपुर 618

367 0.0048 617 0.0215

3.0413

कुल

(आस्फाल्टेड

303 0.0001

हुसैनपुर

रास्ता)

305 0.0799 613 0.0091

306 0.0472 612 0.1012

611 0.1287

307 0.0353 608 0.0531

308 0.0367 607 0.1147

309 0.0086 606 0.0139

310 0.0754 595 0.0010

313 0.0543 594 0.0514

311 0.0106 593 0.0711

318 0.0076 592(663) 0.0126

319 0.1154 592 0.1337

ब्रिक 0.0248 618 0.0350

619 0.0191

रास्ता

0.2124

268

320 0.0935 278 0.0202

301 0.0106 285 0.0098

302 0.0051 289 0.3748

321 0.0964 290 0.0109

ब्रिक 0.0148 291 0.0126

रास्ता

295 0.1144

322 0.4486 296 0.1994

323 0.0148 294 0.1457

324 0.2854

0.0290

299

327 0.0114 (कच्चा

328 0.0391 रास्ता)

329 0.0536 301 0.0003

331(723) 0.0094 561 0.0024

331 0.0159 (कच्चा

332 0.3169 रास्ता)

334 0.0163 381 0.1177

(कच्चा

382 0.0081

रास्ता)

380 0.1460 195 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

4 5 2

340 0.0195

हुसैनपुर

गाजियाबाद मोदीनगर

492

मोदीनगर रूहेल्लापुर

0.0170

गाजियाबाद

341 0.1371

491 0.0993 343 0.0049

490 0.0057 342 0.0210

489 0.0716 345 0.1591

488 0.0518

487 0,0301

0.0281

339(707)

339 0.2500

486 0.0164 352 0.0159

485 0.0069

0.4811

354

484 0.0001

0.2424

360

480 0.0175 364 0.0024

477 0.0779 365 0.1551

478 0.0061 366 0.1322

479 0.1274. 363 0.0001

476 0.0062

462 0.0123

3.5768

कुल

0.0085

0.0104

699

रूहेल्लापुर

2.0920

कुल

539 0.0100

बिहंग

681 0.2743

0.0140

562 0.0100 682 0.0355

680 0.0027

563 0.1737 679 0.0023

561 0.0032 678 0.0340

560 0.0089 677 0.0274

562 0.0051 676 0.0198

(कच्चा रास्ता) 675 0.0115

565 0.0128 674 0.0039

566 0.0123 606 0.0204

567 0.0150 553 0.0421

583 0.0093 554 0.0202

(कच्चा रास्ता) 555 0.0386

584 0.0281 557 0.0518

582 0.0083 558 0.1062

568 0.4321 559 0.1030

575 0.2561 580 0.0187

578 0.2579 (कच्चा रास्ता)

579 0.1586 560 0.0062

577 0.2226

0.0058

561

574 0.0111 570 0.0007

532 0.0123 569 0.0804

496 0.0133 568 0.1447

495 0.0085 567 0.0044

0.0079

514

0.0060

572

0.0436

488

573 0.1062

489 0.0637 574 0.1945

490 0.1860 575 0.1547

491 0.0711 576 0.0004

484 0.4367 196

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 19, 2008 /PAUSA 29, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] 2

5 471

1319 0.0072

0.0114

बिहंग

गाजियाबाद मोदीनगर

गाजियाबाद मोदीनगर नेकपुर

472 0.0114

सबितनगर (कच्चा रास्ता)

1327 0.0013

2.5049

कुल

1326 0.1274 1950 0.0084

नेकपुर

1320 0.1333 सबितनगर ( कच्चा रास्ता)

1324 0.0204 1949 0.0591

1321 0.0430 1943 0.0238

1323/ 0.0048 1903 0.3172

2085

1904 0.1418

1322 0.0292 1905 0.1834

1439 0.0183

0.0817

1906/अ

(कच्चा रास्ता) 1907 0.0295

1731/ब 0.2714 1908 0.0003

1730 0.1580 1939 0.6880

1729 0.1989 1938 0.1182

1728 0.0247 1878 0.0120

1724 0.0187 (कच्चा रास्ता)

1721/3 0.4429 1877 0.0195

1722 0.0188

0.2190

1794/ब

1723 0.1038 1793 0.0018

1688 0.0033 1792 0.0846

1687 0.0056 1791 0.2394

1686 0.0156 1720 0.0011

1445 0.0221 (कच्चा रास्ता)

(मेटल रास्ता) 1269 0.0029

1443 0.0221 1270 0.0001

144/ब 0.0214 1295 0.0935

111 0.0466 1296 0.0096

0.0928

144/3

1297 0.0011

145/3 0.0055 1294 0.1377

141 0.0151 1293 0.1360

143/अ 0.1680

0.1597

1292/अ

142/अ 0.2642

0.0674

1291

0: 1650

142/ब

1290/अ 0.0003

188 0.0157 1290/ब 0.0023

189 0.0177 1299 0.0095

182 0.4257 (कच्चा रास्ता)

184 0.2244 1300 0.0206

181 0.0255

0.0145

1314/ब

180 0.0481 1315/3 0.0544

179 0.0390

0.0782

1316/अ

0.0384

307

308 0.0756

0.0181

1316/ब

319 0.1391 1317 0.1846

320 0.0898 1318/3 0.1741 [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

321 0.0931

गाजियाबाद मोदीनगर नेकपुर

0.0056

322.

सबितनगर

323 0.0032

0.0369

346

347 0.0339

344 0.0062

324 0.0036

345 0.1144

197

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty one days from the date ofwhich the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3.of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri Ramavtar Pal , Competent Authority, GAIL ( India) Limited, GTI , PARC Building, Plot No. 24, Sector - 16A, Noida, Distt . Gautam Budh Nagar -201301 (U.P. )

SCHEDULE

District Tehsil

331 0.1628

332 0.0286

335 0.0112

474 0.1347

473 0.1617

472

Village Survey

No.

Area to be acquired for ROU (inHectares) 2

0.0151

Gaziabad. Hapur

0.1697

471 0.0009

470 0.1275

469 0.0001

0.2479

502

0.3062

503

517 0.3627

523 0.2201

0.0821

524

0.0732

522

531 0.0234

532 0.3786

533 0.0048

9.7952

कुल

[फाईल सं. एल-14014/27/07-जी.पी .]

एस. बी. मंडल , अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 15th January, 2008

S.O. 105. Whereas it appears to the Government of India that it is necessary in public interest that for trans- portation of natural gas through Dadri - Bawana-Nangal pipeline project in the state of Uttar Pradesh , a pipeline shouldbe laidby GAIL (India) Limited;

And, whereas it appears to the Government of Indiathat for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification .

Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) ofSection 3 ofthe Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition ofRight ofUser in Land) Act, 1962 , (50 of 1962) the Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.

1351

Hasanpur

0.1278 Lodha 1311

1310 0:3213

0.4950

1309

1308 0.0171

1306 0.3209

1305 0.2383

1304 0.1728

1302 0.0111

1301 0.1392

1298 0.1890

0.0227

Asphat

Road

1194 0.0310

1195 0.1185

1196 0.1888

1200 0.1167

1201 0.0283

0.1254

1202

1203 0.0509

1207 0.2807

1208 0.0119

0.3997

1209

1210 0.5728

Cart 0.0061

Track

1211 0.0597

1212 0.0991

1213 0.0674

1214 0.1009

1215 0.1138

0.0123

1216

1217 0.1545

1218 0.2108 198

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2

0.0405

Gaziabad Dinanath- 85

Gaziabad

1220 0.2762

Gaziabad Hapur Hasanpur

0.2144

81/B

pur Puthi

1221 0.0096

Lodha

0.1600

81/A

5.1053

Total

0.3007

0.0845

0.2592

ArifpurG.B. 47

0.0444

0.0186 45

0.3596

0.0006

0.5225 44

0.1080

0.0099

0.0072

0.0239

3.7015

Total

0.0158

0.0515

Raghunath 79

(Service Road)

0.1855

83-A

pur

0.0571

0.0007

40 0.4835

25 0.1371

0.0286

0.3747

Total

0.0572

Pipleda 307 0.1214 28

0.3511

0.3872

306

0.0147

0.1880

305

0.2258

0.0073

308

24 0.4120

299 0.0890 23

0.1810

0.4801

298

22 0.0629

297 0.0316 Cart 0.0259

(CartTrack) Track

296 0.1301 4

0.9264

292 0.0179 1

0.0082

0.2019

291

(CartTrack)

287 0.0653

3.6523

Total

0.0250

286/A

288 0.0090

0.0030

403/B

Dinanath-

Gaziabad

290 0.3426

0.4145

purPuthi 403 / A

289

402 0.0110

0.0516

274 0.0348 401 0.0205

335 0.2969

0.1188

388/A

284 0.0244 387 0.4117

(CartTrack) 386 0.0807

0.1968

271

383 0.0027

0.2675

270

382 0.0102

0.0667

269

0.4252

378

266 0.0183

0.2924

379

265 0.0162 Drain

262 0.1061

0.0198

(374)

263 0.0096 ODR Road

0.0285

264 0.0094 (107)

0. 1844

0.0003

250/B

0.3236.

0.2109

251/A

0.0028

0.1478

252-A भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1 1

0.0063

252/B

Gaziabad Pipleda

Gaziabad

0.0084

249

248 0.0106

247 0.0291

0.1356

246-B

0.0241

246-A

244 0.0159

245 0.0094

242-A 0.0572

0.5069 .

243

0.0096

238

236 0.0135

0.0180

235

216 0.0490

0.2056

219

0.2539

217

213 0.1645

0.0335

214

215 0.0085

Ashp- 0.0273

haltRoad

Total 5.1405

2719 0.0163

Dasna

Dehat

0.0006

2720

2730 0.1676

2729 0.0102

2728 0.0030

0.2545

2731

2732 0.0024

0.0045

2723

2756 0.2619

2757.0.0247

2758 0.0078

2629 0.0057

2620 0.0306

2630 0.0095

2631 0.0120

2667 0.3978

2650 0.0092

2649 0.0461

2643 0.0557

2641 0.2369

2651 0.0182

2652 0.0193

0.1562

2640

2639 0.0073 62G1/08-6

199 2

2654 0.1128

Gaziabad Gaziabad Dasna

2656 0.0122 Dehat

0.0299

2575

0.0657

2576

0.4185

2577

2590 0.0073

2589 0.1360

2588 0.0876

2587 0.0785

0.0900.

2586

2582 0.4301

0.0556

2500

2331 0.0508

2583 0.0067

2584 0.0070

0.0221

2506.

0.0570

2505

2504 0.0360

2503 0.1262

2501 0.0277

2502 0.0051

2503 0.0244

2329 0.0487

2019-SH 0.0422

2020-SH 0.0664

2021 -SH 0.0287

1996 0.0465

0.0230

1991

0.0277

1992

0.0826

1995

0.0635

1994

1982 0.0385

0.0053

1999

2000 0.0050

1992 0.0431

0.3064

2001

2003 0.2815

0.0217

2004

0.0256

2005

0.0829

2006

0.0335

2007

2008 0.0096

0.0092

2009-

0.3082

2011

0.1030

2013

0.0179

1833-

RLY 200

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008 /PAUSA 29 , 1929

0.0214

1832-

Gaziabad Gaziabad Dasna

RLY

Dehat

0.0518

1831-

RLY

1824 0.1160

1823 0.1368

1818 0.0292

1817 0.0517

1814 0.0070

1813 0.0105

0.0657

1811

1812 0.0595

1810 0.0269

1809 0.1543

0.1584

1808

0.0849

1807

1793 0.0225

1794 0.0110

1.95 0.1548

NALA 0.0191

1792 0.0910

1791 0.0110

1784 0.0038

ROAD 0.0274

1783 0.0336

0.1402

1782

1780 0.2752

1777 0.0733

1776 0.0419

1775 0.0211

1774 0.0092

1071 0.0024

1072 0.0011

1773 0.0003

1781 0.0301

Total 7.3088

0,0578

Masuri 540

0.0578

Total

0.3019

1358

Kushaliya

0.2367

1357

1356 0.0374

1355 0.0083

1338 0.4652

1341 0.0151

1342 0.0124

0.0046

1350

0.1675

1349

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii)] 3

0.1911

Gaziabad Gaziabad Kushaliya 1343

1336 0.0024

1335 0.0253

1334 0.0170

1329 0.2156

0.0143

1330

1331 0.4100

1325 0.0197

1324 0.0064

0.2865

1323/1

1322 0.1125

1312 0.0095

1311/1 0.4123

1310 0.0130

1309 0.1867

1308 0.0175

1264 0.0120

1263 0.2657

1157 0.0530

0.0662

1156

1154 0.0426

(MetalRoad)

0.1234

1153

0.1972

1159

1152 0.0836

0.0354

1151

1160 0.0636

1150 0.1601

1147 0.0530

0.2292

1148Mi .

1141 0.0338

(CartTrack)

1136 0.1188

0.0953

1135

0.0310

1134

(Cart Track)

0.1886

1131

1130 0.1382

0.0292

1129

707 0.0307

(Drain)

706 0.0232

704 0.1947

0.0176

705

703 0.0174

702 0.1326

701 0.0002 201 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

1285 0.1103

0.2947

Gaziabad Gaziabad Kanauja

Gaziabad Gaziabad Kushaliya 687

1286 0.2550 700 0.0592

1284 0.0241 699 0.3685

1283 0.0055 698 0.6351

1282 0.3015 618 0.1599

940 0.0029

0.1740

616

(CartTrack) 615 0.1342

791 0.0228 614 0.0026

(Road)

604 0.0925

792 0.2120

0.0482

605

757 0.0140 603 0.1645

741 0.2011 602 0.1657

0.0212

748

601 0.1042

747 0.2830 600 0.0228

0.1171

746

599 0.1631

742 0.0020 Total 8.3710

735 0.2011 Matiala 83

0.1670

743 0.2800 82

0.0283

744 0.0261

0.1952

Total

736 0.0105 1376

(CartTrack).

0.8064

Kanauja

716 0.0008 1373 0.0336

734 0.0037 1374 0.0367

730 0.0044 1372 0.2865

729 0.2089 1352 0.0136

728 0.2235 (CartTrack)

725 0.3733 1353 0.0160

724 0.0205 1344 0.6493

1343 0.2471

609 0.4909 1333

608 0.0303

0.0136

(CartTrack) (CartTrack)

606 0.2731 1319 0.0030

621 0.0543 (CartTrack)

1321 0.0007

(Road)

630 0.5494 (Nali)

1322 0.0022

0.0238

Drain

(CartTrack)

624 0.1276 1327 0.4092

627 0.1384 1326 0.0339

0.0152

Canal

0.0096

1325

625 0.0068 (Nali)

626 0.0097

0.4763

1323

7.9815

Total

1324 0.0360

0.1567

503

Modinagar Muhiud-

1305 0.0071

0.0153

dinpur 502

(Nali)

Hisauli 497 0.0246 1304 0.0082

498 0.1489 (Cart Track)

499 0.0218 1289 0.2476 202

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008 /PAUSA 29, 1929

0.0198

0.0110

324

Modinagar Muhiud- 228

Gaziabad

Gaziabad Modinagar Asalat-

0.3932 Cart 0.0110

314-

nagar

dinpur

Canal

Track

Hisauli

312 0.5904

485 0.2038

311 0.0349

483 0.0643

484 0.1582

0.0499

310

486 0.6414

309 0.0302

0.0253

479

0.0009

317-A

0.0250

476

315 0.0480

0.1761

467

0.0960

259-

466 0.0208

(Road)

465 0.1279

0.0009

255

463 0.0935

248 0.0012

0.0309

460

247 0.0002

462 0.0526

0.1627

461

0.1042

244

0.1599

452

0.0252

169-

Canal

453 0.0004

449 0.1281

0.0427

167-

450 0.0125

Canal

445 0.0002

164- 0.0167

0.2068

447

Canal

448 0.0972

155- 0.0291

0.2087

Canal

441

0.0017

442

0.0334

154-

0.0117

Canal

439

438 0.0091

0.1159

144

443 0.0147

243 0.0485

(Asphalt Road)

245 0.0480

0.0145

307

242 0.1115

0.0161

308

239 0.1586

0.1730

322/A

232 0.1633

0.1242

322/B

233 0.0567

326/B 0.2924

0.0804

231

0.0389

326/ A

201 0.0686

0.1317

321

194 0.1047

0.1423

327

337

195 0.1726

0.1935

338 0.0012

196 0.1673

0.5148

339

197 0.0308

0.1077

357

198 0.0001

(Railway)

0.0273

189-

343 0.1384

Road

342 0.0943

0.1116

183 -B

0.1669

341

0.3903

183 -A

0.0067

344

182-A 0.0137

0.0273

340

0.1016

182-B

(Canal)

180- FC 0.0097

0.0007

179 0.1951

Total 5.2160

0.0071

178 203

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

5 1

418 0.3120

0.0171

175- FC

Głaziabad Modinagar Asalat-

Gaziabad Modinagar Nabipur

176 0.0075

417 0.0263 nagar

174 0.0729

421 0.3615

416 0.0004

3.7890

Total

495 0.3251

0.0354

185

Modinagar Basant-

494 0.0740

0.4150

184

pur Saitli

493 0.0059.

183 0.0150

(CartTrack)

172 0.4965

0.1730

492/A

170 0.0103

490 0.3069

Road

484 0.0115

0.0596

148

(Asphalted Road)

0.2314

147

0.0082

1.2631

Total

471 (Asphalted Road)

469 0.0001

0.0383

150

Modinagar Sobhapur

(Road)

149 0.2044

472 0.6531 79 0.0364

0.0128

0.0550

30 (ODR Metal Road)

0.0452

29 0.2095

0:2435

0.0365

0.0222

(Road)

21 0.1012

0.0012

0.0010

74 0.0854

0.0065

87 0.0439

0.0018 86/B 0.1251

0.6057 88

0.0975

0.0203

0.2715

0.0116

0.1070

3.2649

Total

0.0097

93 0.0628

0.3872

Modinagar Sultanpur 370

0.0829

0.0412

365A

366 0.0072

0.0276

0.0061

367

95 0.1183

369 0.1883

107 0.0614

368 0.0001

100 0.0218

0.0238

371

0.0173

103

(Road)

106 0.0341

372 0.0239

0.0707

105

(Tikri Dis .)

0.0243

373 0.0136

0.0120

(Tikri Dis.)

0.2620

375 0.0002

0.1354

0.0016

376

0.0010

377 0.4292

378 0.0084

0.0070

0.1629

381B

Total 2.2834 204

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008 /PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii)]

5 2

0.3585 Gaziabad Modinagar Sultanpur 381A 0.0246

Gaziabad Modinagar Kishan- 44

0.3657 383 0.1296

chandpur 46

Patti

0.0061 382 0.1312

0.0867 384 0.0092

0.0064

385 0.0088

1.3075 386B 0.1890

0.0161

0.4768

386A

2.1469

Total

396 0.0104

392 0.0146

Modinagar Manauli

397 0.3208

0.0069

393

409 0.0156

398 0.1511 410 0.0440

0.0044

397

423A 0.0030

400. 0.0174 422 0.0006

401 0.0105 416A 0.0107

(Sultanpur minor) 416B 0.1177

402 0.0101

0.1085

415A

(Sultanpur minor) 415B 0.1334

0.0128

403

414A 0.0281

404 0.1447

0.0375 414B 0.1320

382(636)

383 0.0111 413A 0.2152

381 0.2832 417 0.0226

380 0.0123

0.1272

412A

378 0.0247 418A 0.0863

379 0.2228 418B 0.0092

386 0.0155 201 0.0184

0.9795

Total

(Road)

0.0051

616 0.0141

Modinagar Sultan

618 0.1533 202 (Road)

Nagar

0.0215 187 0.0047

Chhajjupur (617)

Ashpalt Road 194 0.0474

613 0.0091 200 0:1942

612 0.1012 199 0.1577

611 0.1287

0.0300

186A

608 0.0531 198 0.2281

607 0.1147

0.6647

197A

606 0.0139

0.2219

195A

595 0.0010 193 0.0089

594 0.0514

0.1678

192A

593 0.0711

0.1549

191A

592(663) 0.0126

0.0008

191B

592 0.1337

0.2040

190A

618 0.0350

0.0010

0.0191 190B

619

268 0.2124 196 0.0094

278 0.0202

5.8091

Total भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29, 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

285 0.0098

Gaziabad Modinagar Nagar

0.3748

289

Chhajjupur

290 0.0109

291 0.0126

295 0.1144

296 0,1994

0.1457

294

299 0.0290

(Cart Track)

301 0.0003

561 0.0024

(CartTrack)

381 0.1177

382 0.0081

380 0,1460

378 0.0110

0.0697

377

376 0.0016

0.0379

375

374 0.0002

360 0.0069

361 0.0750

0.1174

362

0.0542

363

0.1441

364

353 0.0513

366 0.1205

341 0.0097

(Drain)

367 0.0048

3.0413

Total

0.0001

Husainpur 303

305 0.0799

306 0.0472

0.0353

307

308 0.0367

309 0.0086

310 0.0754

0.0543

313

311 0.0106

318 0.0076

319 0.1154

0.0248

Brick

Road

320 0.0935

301 0.0106

0.0051

302

205

0.0964

Gaziabad Modinagar Husainpur 321

0.0148

Brick Road

322 0.4486

323 0.0148

0.2854

324

327 0.0114

0.0391

328

329 0.0536

0.0094

331(723)

331 0.0159

332 0.3169

334 0.0163

(CartTrack)

340 0.0195

341 0.1371

343 0.0049

342 0.0210

345 0.1591

339(707) 0.0281

339 0.2500

352 0.0159

354 0.4811

360 0.2424

364 0.0024

0.1551

365

366 0.1322

363 0.0001

Total 3.5768

0.0104 Modinagar Ruhellapur 699

539 0.0100

681 0.2743

682 0.0355

680 0.0027

679 0.0023

678 0.0340

677 0.0274

676 0.0198

675 0.0115

674 0.0039

606 0.0204

553 0.0421

554 0.0202

0.0386

555

557 0.0518

558 0.1062- 206

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

0.1030

Gaziabad Modinagar Ruhellapur 559.

580 0.0187

(Cart Track)

560 0.0062

561 0.0058

570 0.0007

569 0.0804

568 0.1447

0.0044

567

572 0.0060

0.1062

573

574 0.1945

575 0.1547

0.0004

576

492 0.0170

491 0.0993

490 0.0057

489 0.0716

488 0.0518

487 0.0301

486 0.0164

485 0,0069

484 0.0001

480 0.0175

477 0.0779

478 0.0061

0.1274

479

476 0.0062

462 0.0123

0.0085

2.0920

Total

0.0140

Modinagar Bihang

562 0.0100

0.1737

563

0.0032

561

0.0089

560

562 0.0051

(CartTrack)

0.0128

565

566 0.0123

567 0.0150

583 0.0093

(CartTrack)

0.0281

584

0.0083

582

0.4321

568

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 2

575 0.2561

Gaziabad Modinagar Bihang

578 0.2579

579 0.1586

577

0.2226

574 0.0111

532 0.0123

496 0.0133

495 0.0085

514 0.0079

488 0.0436

489 0.0637

490 0.1860

0.0711

491

484 0.4367

471 0.0114

0.0114

472

2.5049

Total

0.0084

1950

Modinagar Nekpur

Sabitnagar ( Cart Track)

1949 0.0591

0.0238

1943

03172

1903

0.1418

1904

0.1834

1905

0.0817

1906/A

0.0295

1907

0.0003

1908

0.6880

1939

1938 0.1182

0.0120

1878

(CartTrack)

0.0195

1877

0.2190

1794/B

1793 0.0018

0.0846

1792

1791 0.2394

1720 0.0011

(CartTrack)

1269 0.0029

0.0001

1270

0.0935

1295

1296 0.0096

1297 0.0011

0.1377

1294

0.1360

1293

0.1597

1292/A [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

207

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29, 1929

1 2

Gaziabad

0.0674

1291

Gaziabad Modinagar Nekpur

Sabitnaga 1290/ A 0.0003

1290/B 0.0023

1299 0.0095

(CartTrack)

1300 0.0206

1314/B 0.0145

0.0544

1315/A

1316/A 0.0782

0.0181

1316/B

1317 0.1846

1318/ A 0.1741

1319 0.0072

(Cart Track)

1327 0.0013

0.1274

1326

1320 0.1333

1324 0.0204

1321 0.0430

1323/ 0.0048

2085

1322 0.0292

0.0183

1439

(CartTrack)

1731 /B 0.2714

1730 0.1580

1729 0.1989

0.0247

1728

1724 0.0187

1721 /A 0.4429

1722 0.0188

1723 0.1038

0.0033

1688

1687 0.0056

1686 0.0156

1445 0.0221

(MetalRoad)

1443 0.0221

144/B 0.0214

111 0.0466

144/A 0.0928

0.0055

145/A

141 0.0151

143/A 0.1680

62G1 /08-7

Modinagar Nekpur 142/A 02642

142/B 0.1650 Sabitnaga

188 0.0157

189 0.0177

182 0.4257

0.2244

184

181 0.0255

180 0.0481

179 0.0390

307 0.0384

308 0.0756

319 0.1391

320 0.0898

321 0.0931

322 0.0056

323 0.0032

346 0.0369

347 0.0339.

344 0.0062

0.0036

324

345 0.1144

331 0.1628

332 0.0286

335 0.0112

474 0.1347

473 0.1617

0.1697

472

471 0.0009

470 0.1275

469 0.0001

502 0.2479

503 0.3062

517 0.3627

523 0.2201

0.0821

524

522 0.0732

0.0234

531

532 0.3786

533 0.0048

Total 9.7952 GRAND TOTAL 79.2797

[F. No. L- 14014/27/07-G.P. ] S. B. MANDAL, Under Secy.

208

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/ PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

5 नई दिल्ली , 15 जनवरी , 2008

खेकरा

गौना

0.0152

बागपत

596

594

0.2244

0.2108

593

592

0.0290 का.आ. 106.- भारत सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीप्त होता है कि उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में दादरी - बवांना- नांगल पाइपलाईन परियोजना के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया) लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाईन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

0.0014

591

517

0.1411

0.1806

518

503

0.0100

0.0725

520

और भारत सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाईन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाईन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

521

0.0489

552

0.0574

551

0.1808

528

0.4770

529

0.1128

533

0.0150 अतः अब , भारत सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाईन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

532

0.2021

534

0.0064

531

0.0456

157

0.0678

0.2764

156

155

0.2890

0.0100

102

0.0356

103

104

0.3455 कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध कर दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाईन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में , श्रीः रामावतार पाल , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड , जी.टी. आई. पी.ए.आर.सी. बिल्डिंग , सेक्टर -16ए , नोएडा, जिला-गौतम बुद्ध नगर-201301 ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) को लिखित रूप में आंक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

105

0.0153

0.0275

108

अनुसूची

0.2688

107

क्षेत्र ( हेक्टर )

जिला तहसील गांव

सर्वे नंबर

0.0174

106

0.3446

125

गौना

639

1.6016

बागपत खेकरा

0.0167

17 (कच्चा रास्ता) 640

0.0150

0.2382

0.2662

641

0.2123

642

0.0060

0.1945 622/743

0.0283

0.3842

614

0.4761

0.1319

622

0.0694

0.0067 615

0.2585

0.2079

0.0120

617

0.2158

0.0758

616

0.0077

0.0077 612

0.0057

611

0.0075

9.0008

कुल

610

0.2106

0.6947

205

लहचौडा

605

0.0296

206

0.2191

0.0040

613

0.0063

203

0.2032

598

(फिल्ड चेनल) 606

0.2044

0.0178

202

597

0.1684

(फिल्ड कच्चा रास्ता)

0,0056

595 209

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

0.4669

521

खेकरा खखेला

0.2298 बागपत

खेकरा लहचौडा 135

बागपत

0.0117

489

0.1570

136

0.1595

(फिल्ड चेनल) 138

0.1283

0.1525

483

137

0.0083

484

0.1404 139

485

0.2173 (कच्चा रास्ता)

486

0.1515 123

0.2862

455

0.0059

0.0072

122

(फिल्ड कच्चा रास्ता) (फिल्ड चेनल)

452

0.0070

0.2969

120

(फिल्डचेनल) 121

0.0418

451

0.1668 (कच्चा रास्ता)

0.0308

0.0165

145

449

450

0.3049 (फिल्ड चेनल)

0.0251 116

0.0043

318

(फिल्ड चेनल)

(बिक्र रास्ता)

0.0012

0.0947 146

319

0.0002

151

0.0699

398

(फिल्डचेनल)

0.0710

399

0.1444

0.5971 115

400

0.0194

152

0.0209

402

112

0.0142

(फिल्ड चेनल) (बिक्र रास्ता)

404

0.0253

0.4368

405

0.2023 23

0.2020

407

0.1941

0.0131

0.1070

408

(फिल्डचेनल)

0.0104

396

0.0062

0.1036

391

(कच्चा रास्ता)

390

0.0834

0.1097

0.1138

389

0.0166

0.0944

388

0.0970

0.0975

387

0.1014

381

0.2502

0.0766

0.0063

380

0.1168

(फिल्ड चेनल)

0.0626

0.0297

379

3.6919

कुल

411

0.0380

(आस्फाल्टेड रास्ता) 529

0.0144

खेला

415

0.0113

0.0846 577

414

0.0076

0.1879

538

(फिल्ड चेनल)

0.1158

539

0.2421

537

413

0.3330

0.0165

526

412

0.0470 (बिक्र कच्चा रास्ता)

0.0527

205(रास्ता)

0.0060

525

5.0093

कुल

(फिल्डचेनल) 210

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

5 2

0.0019

386 मि

0.0097 नागला बहेरी 206अ

बागपत खेकरा राबन उर्फ

बागपत खेकरा

205

0.0134

बरागांव

384

0.3239 1

(आस्फल्टेड रास्ता)

0.0667

365

0.3856

0.0093

364

2बा

363

0.1340

0.0489

0.3310

362

0.0049

0.0566

361

0.0795 5

1.0061

0.2692

338

0.0132

337

1.1916

कुल

0.2685

334/1

राबन उर्फ

0.3532

769मि.

333

0.0356

0.8246

बरागांव

768/अ

326

0.0232 768/ब

0.0546

0.2345

314

313

0.3604

0.0199

763मि.

0.0344

312 ब

0.0053

770मि.

740

0.3883

9.5763

कुल

0.0227

762

1729/बा

0.1841

खेकरा रूरल

761

0.0040

0.0615

1729/अ

756

0.0038

1728

0.3504 751

0.0263

0.0019

1732

0.6249

750

0.0011

1734

0.0095

748मि.

1743

0.0519

0.0156

746

0,0083

1725

0.0156

0.0084

1724

(फिल्ड कच्चा रास्ता)

0.1568

1723

0.3840

738

0.1047

1721/अ

0.0078

739

0.3812

1721/ब

728/ब

0.4320

1745

0.0106

0.4920

728/अ

1846

-0.0059 727

0.3960

0.0076

1746

725

0.0067

0.2027

1696/अ

(फिल्ड कच्चा रास्ता)

0.0118

1695

724

0.4406

1693

0.2513 723

0.0085

0.1487

1692/अ

720

0.2292

0.0675

1692/ब

0.1712

721मि

1687

0.2433 717

0.0193

0.4608

1686

507

0.2002

1685

0.0122 506(कच्चा रास्ता) 0.0136

1684

0.1924

0.3358

503

0.0907

1683

170

0.0228

1681/अ

0.1786

0.1100

410/अ

1680

0.2801

0.7650

410/ब

1679

0.0181 402

0.0094

1661

0.1918 387

0.3845 211

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

5 1

1662

0.0060

322/

0.0126 बागपत खेकरा खेकरा रूरल

बागपत खेकरा खेकरा रूरल

1672

0.0061

आस्फाल्टेड रास्ता

0.0165

1669

317

0.1824

0.0099

1671

318

0.0215 1668

0.0121

0.2605

319/रेलवे

1666

0.2049

0.0445

359/रेलवे

1663

0.3331

0.0052

265/रेलवे

1545

0.0339

0.0520

365/रेलवे

0.1998

1573/अ

0.2248

260

1572/अ

0.1960

0.4454

258

1572/ब

0.1560

0.0265

261

0.0101

1570

0.0181

253

0.0176

1569

214

0.0071

0.1958

0.3687

215

1548/अ

217

0.2584 1548/ब

0.0259

0.3240

212/अ

0.3768

1549/अ

0.0067

223

1549/ब

0.0100

0.1755

226/अ

1550

0.1120

0.0419

227/ब

1551

0.0391

0.0817

227/अ

1552

0.1585

0.1240

0.1941 1553

195/ब

0.0385

1528/केनाल

0.0018

195/अ

1487

0.1249

0.0621

194/अ

0.0471

1588

192/अ

0.1669

0.0608

1380

0.1075

192/ब

0.0603

1379

0.0422

193/अ

1381/डेइन 0.1054

0.4126

87/अ

0.0164

1387

0.0417

513

1382/अ

0.3544

0.0098

511

0.4018

1382/ब

0.1189

512/अ

1383

0.2750

512/ब

0.0292 1398

0.0180

0.0760

514

0.0120

1399

0.0069

515

0.2234

1406

0.0441

519/ब

0.2361

1405

0.1793

85/ब

0.0045

1404

0.0045

1403

0.1870

526/अ

0.0107

1410

524

0.0077 355

0.1535

0.0346

525/अ

0.0130

346

0.4290

525/ब

0.4376

345

0.0093

530

0.0040

354

0.0259

574/अ

0.0347

353

0.0572

574/ब

0.1168

347

0.0317

575/ब

0.0136

323/

0.5721 आस्फाल्टेड रास्ता

575/अ 212

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008 /PAUSA 29, 1929

1177

खेकरा

0.0622

खेकरा

572

काठा

0.0829 खेकरा रूरल

1172

0.0506

0.0375

571/अ

1173

0.0479

0.1797

579/अ

0.0442

1174

0.2760

579/ब

0.0368

1175

580

0.0443

0.0277

1311

564

0.0070

1171

0.0155 569

0.0064

0.1088

1312

563

0.2189

0.1200

1410

562/अ

0.0458

0.0453

1313

562/ब

0.4090

0.1848

1409

0.1932

581

1316

0.0731

0.0224

582

0.0504

1317

0.1107

1318

583/अ

0.0252

1407

0.0211

0.0241

583/ब

1320

0.0358 560

0.0096

1323

0.1442

15.4012

कुल

1324

0.1403

1.0529

282/अ

0.0071 आनन्दपुर

1014

274

0.0297

0.1433

1013

1010

0.0021

1.0826

कुल

0.0608

1011

काठा

2520

0.0478

0.0709

1012

2775

0.0448

1039

0.0682 2774

0.4410

0.0709

1040

2773

0.0175

0.0209

1005

2769

0.2851

1004

0.0824

0.0531

2770

0.0436

1003

0.0003

2771

1001

0.0378

0.2690

2765

0.0860

1002

2764

0.1888

0.0589

1068

0.1872

2763

0.2145

1069

2755

Ο. 1432

0.0015

1073

0.1810

2731

1070

0.1376 2730

0.5024

1071

0.1111 2714/ब

0.0821

939

0.1134 2713

0.0087

0.0656

937

0.0837

2712

0.0026

938

2711

0.0219

900

0.0718 2710

0.0289

0.1147

903

0.0213

2709

904

0.0005

0.0150

2708

902

0.0465 2707

0.0016

906

0.1321

0.0031

907

0.1946 2706/ब

908

0.0570 2704

0.0022

0.0004

872

1178

0.0007

1176

0.0020

871

0.0192 213

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

5 काठा

0.0104

खेकरा

869

0.0986

खेकरा मवीकलां बाम्गर 1600

868

0.1012

0.2313

1595/अ

867

0.0113

0.0662

1595/ब

866

0.0518

1539

0.0336

0.0824

865

1538

0.0405

0.0222

864

1537

0.0213 863

0.0443

0.0664

1531

0.0508

862

1536

0.0062 861.

0.1161

0.0965

1532

846

0.0283

1530

0.0106 844

0.1756

843

0.0730

0.0498

1529

1533

0.0319

84/कच्चा रास्ता

0.0418

0.0073

800

1534

0.0264

0.0511

799

1527

0.0054

0.0940

798

1528

0.1385

0.0287

797

1506

0.2340

6.9889

कुल

1470

0.0237

1469

0.0133

0.0538

1692

मवीकलां बाम्गर

1468

0.0081 1691

0.3417

1471

0.1466 1687/ब

0.1293

1473

0.0010

0.1212

1687/अ

0,0061

1472

0.0120

1686

1441

0.0355

0.0120

1685

1440

0.2150

0.2359

1644/ब

0.0484

रास्ता

0.4318

1644/अ

5.2975

0.4257

1643/अ

कुल

0.1845

1642/अ

[फा. सं एल-14014/27/07- जी.पी. ]

एस. बी. मंडल , अवर सचिव 1642/ब

0.0225

1637

0.1242

New Delhi , the 15th January, 2008 1631

0.0056

1630

0.0055

1629/ब

0.0558

0.1110

1629/अ

S.O. 106. Whereas it appears to the Government ofIndia that it is necessary in public interest that for trans- portation of natural gas through Dadri -Bawana - Nangal pipeline project in the state of Uttar Pradesh, a pipeline should be laid by GAIL (India) Limited;

1626/अ

0.1864

1625/अ

0.4270

0.0079

1625/ब

0.1361

1624

1623

0.0380

And, whereas it appears to the Government of India that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which isdescribed in the Schedule annexed to this notification .

0.0362

1622

0.0989

स्टेट हाईवे रास्ता

1602

0.0771

0.1683

1601

0.1839

Now, therefore , in exercise of powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) ofSection 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition ofRight ofUser in Land) Act, 1962, (50 of 1962) the Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein .

1594 214

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

1 Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date ofwhich the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the laying of the pipeliné under the land to Shri Ramavtar Pal , Competent Authority, GAIL ( India) Limited,GTI, PARC Building , Plot No. 24 , Sector- 16A, Noida, Distt . Gautam Budh Nagar-201301 (U.P. )

SCHEDULE

District Tehsil Village Survey No.

Area to be acquired forROU (inHectares) 11

639

1.6016 Gauna

Bagpat Khekra

640

0.0150

0.2662

641

642

0.0060

622/743

0.0283

614

0.4761

622

0.0694

0.2585

615

617

0.0120

616

0.0758

612

0.0057

611

0.0075

0.2106

610

605

0.0296

613

0.0040

0.2032

598

606

0.2044

597

0.1684

0.0056

595

596

0.0152

0.2244

594

593

0.2108

0.0290

592

591

0.0014

517

0.1411

0.1806

518

503

0.0100

520

0.0725

521

0.0489

552

0.0574

551

0.1808

528

0.4770

529

0.1128

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 2

533

0.0150

Bagpat Khekra Gauna

532

0.2021

534

0.0064

531

0.0456

157

0.0678

156

0.2764

155

0.2890

0.0100

102

103

0.0356

104

0.3455

105

0.01 53

108

0.0275

107

0.2688

106

0.0174

125

0.3446

0.0167

17 (Cart Track)

0.2382

0.2123

0.1945

0.3842

0.1319

0.0067

0.2079

0.2158

0.0077

TOTAL

9,0008

0.6947 Lahchauda 205

206

0.2191

0.0063

203

(Field Channel ).

202

0.0178

(Field Cart Track)

0.2298

135

136

0.1570

138

0.1595

137

0.1283

0.0083

139

(CartTrack)

123

0.2862

0.0072

122

(Field Channel)

120

0.2969

121

0.0418

(CartTrack) भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

5 1

145

0.0165 Bagpat

Bagpat Khekra Lahchauda

(Field Channel)

116

0.0043

(FieldChannel)

0.0012

146

0.0002

151

(FieldChannel)

115

Ο.1444

152

0.0194

112

0.0142

(BrickRoad)

0.4368

0.2020

0.0131

(FieldChannel)

0.0062

(Cart Track)

0.1097

0.0166

0.0970

0.1014

0.0766

0.1168

0.0626

TOTAL

3.6919

529

0.0144 Khaila

577

0.0113

538

0.1879

0.1158

539

537

0.2421

526

0.0165

(Brick Cart Track)

525

0.0060

(FieldChannel)

521

0.4669

0.0117

489

(FieldChannel)

0.1525

483

484

0.1404

0.2173

485

486

0.1515

455

0.0059

(FieldCart Track)

452

0.0070

(FieldChannel)

451

0.1668

449

0.0308 82G1/08-8

215 2

450

0.3049 Khekra Khaila

318

0.0251

(BrickRoad)

319

0.0947

0.0699

398

0.0710

399

0.5971

400

402

0.0209

(FieldChannel)

0.0253

404

405

0.2023

0.1941

407

0.1070

408

0.0104

396

0.1036

391

390

0.0834

389

0.1138

388

0.0944

387

0.0975

381

0.2502

380

0.0063

(FieldChannel)

0.0297

379

411

0.0380

(Asphalted Road)

415

0.0846

414

0.0076

(FieldChannel)

413

0.3330

0.0470

412

0.0527

205(Road)

TOTAL 5.0093

0.0019

206A.

NaglaBaheri

205

0.0134

(Asphalted Road)

0.3856

0.1340

0.3310

0.0566

0.2692

TOTAL 1.1916

0.3532

769Mi.

RawanUrf

0.8246

768A

Baragaon

0.0546

768B

763Mi

0.0199

0.0053

770Mi 216

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

0.1841

Khekra Khekra Rural 1729/B

Bagpat

740

0.3883

Bagpat Khekra Rawan Urf

1729/A

0.0615 762

0.0227

Baragaon

1728

0.3504 761

0.0040

1732

0.0019 756

0.0038

1734

0.0011 751

0.0263

1743

0.0519 750

0.6249

1725

0.0083

0.0095

748Mi.

1724

0.0084 746

0.0156

1723

0.1568 FieldCT

0.0156

0.1047

1721/A

738

0.3840

0.3812

1721/B

0.0078

739

0.0106

1745

728/B

0.4320

0.0059

1846

1746

728/A

0.0076

0.4920

0.2027

1696/A

0.3960

727

1695

0.0118

0.0067

725 (fieldCT)

0.2513

1693.

724

0.4406

0.1487

1692/A

723

0.0085

1692/B

0.0675 720

0.2292

1687

0.2433

0.1712

721 Mi.

1686

0:2002 717

0.0193

0.0122

1685

507

0.4608

0:1924

1684

)0.0136

506(Cart Track

1683

0.0907 503

0.3358

1681/A

0.1786 170

0.0228

0.2801

1680

410/A

0.1100

0.0181

1679

0.7650

410/B

0.1918

1661

0.0094

402

0.0060

1662

0.3845

387

0.0061

1672

0.0097

386Mi.

0.0165

1669

384

0.3239

0.0099

1671

365

0.0667

0.2605

1668

0.2049 364

0.0093

1666

0.3331

0.0489

1663

363

0.0339

1545

362

0.0049

0.1998

1573 /A

0.0795

361

0.1560

1572/B

338

1.0061

0.1960

1572/A

337

0.0132

0.0101

1570

334/1

0.2685

0.0176

1569

0.0356

333

0.3687

1548 /A

0.0232

326

0.0259

1548/B

0.2345

314

0.3768

1549/A

313

0.3604

0.0100

1549/B

0.0344

312/B

0,1120

1550

TOTAL

9.5763

0.0391

1551 217

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

5 17

0.0817

0.1585

Khekra Rural 227 -A

Bagpat Khekra

Khekra Khekra Rural 1552

Bagpat

1553

0.1240

195-B

0.1941

0.0018

0.0385

1528 -CANAL

195-A

0.1249

0.0621

194-A

1487

0.1669 1588

0.0471

192-A

0.1075

192-B

1380

0.0608

0.0422

193-A

0.0603

1379

0.4126

87-A

0.1054

1381-DRAIN

0.0417

513

1387

0.0164

0.0098

511

0.3544

1382-A

0.1189

512-A

0.4018

1382-B

0.0292

512-B

0.2750

1383

0.0760

514

0.0180

1398

0.0069

515

0.0120

1399

0.0441

519-B

0.2234

1406

0.1793

85-B

0.2361

1405

526-A

0.1870

0.0045

1404

524

0.0077 1403

0.0045

525-A

0.0346

0.0107

1410

525-B

0.4290

0.1535

355

530

0.0093 346

0.0130

0.0259

574-A

345

0.4376

574-B

0.0572 354

0.0040

0.0317

575-B

0.0347

353

0.5721

575-A

347

0.1168

572

0.0622

0.0136

323-ASP

0.0375

571-A

322-ASP

0.0126

579-A

0.1797

0.1824

317

0.2760

579-B

318

0.0215

0.0443

580

0.0121

319-RLY

564

0.0070

0.0445

359-RLY

569

0.0064

0.0052

265-RLY

0.2189

563

0.0520

365-RLY

0.0458

562-A

260

0.2248

0.4090

562-B

0.4454

258

581

0.1932

0.0265

261

0.0224

582

0.0181

253

0.0252

583 -A

0.0071

214

0.0241

583-B

0.1958

215

0.0096

560

0.2584

217

TOTAL 15.4012

0.3240.

212-A

1.0529

282-A

0.0067

223

Anandpur

274

0.0297 226-A

0.1755

0.0419

227 -B

1.0826

TOTAL 218

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

5 2

0.0021

1010

0.0478

2520

Khekra Katha

Bagpat

Bagpat Khekra Katha

0.0608

1011

0.0448

2775

1012

0.0709

0.4410

2774

0.0682

1039

0.0175

2773

0.0709

1040

0.2851

2769 M

0.0209

1005

0.0531

2770

0.0824

1004

0.0003

2771

0.0436

1003

0.2690

2765

0.0378

1001

0.1888

2764

0.0860

1002

0.1872

2763

0.0589

1068

0.1432

2755

0.2145

1069

0.1810

2731

0.0015

1073

0.5024

2730

0.1376

1070

2714/B

0.0821

0.1111

1071

2713

0.0087

939

0.1134

0.0837

2712

0.0656

937

0.0219

2711

0.0026

938

0.0289

2710

900

0.0718 2709

0.0213

0.1147

903

0.0150

2708

904

0.0005

0.0016

2707

902

0.0465

0.0031

2706/B

906

0.1321 2704

0.0022

907

0.1946

0.0007

1178

0.0570

908

0.0020

1176

0.0004

872

0.0829

1177

0.0192

871

0.0506

1172

0.0104

869

0.0479

1173

868

0.1012

0.0442

1174

0.0113

867

0.0368

1175

866

0.0518

0.0277

1311

865

0.0824

0.0155

1171

864

0.0222

0.1088

1312

0.0443

863

0.1200

1410

0.0508

862

0.0453

1313

0.1161

861

0.1848

1409

0.0283

846

0.0731

1316

0.1756

844

0.0504

1317

843

0.0730

0.1107

1318

841-Cart Track 0.0319

0.0211

1407

800

0.0073

0.0358

1320

0.0511

799

0.1442

1323

798

0.0940 1324

0.1403

0.0287

797

0.0071

1014

0.1433

1013

TOTAL

6.9889 219

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

5 1

0.0010

1473

1692

0.0538

Mawikalan

Bagpat Khekra

Bagpat Khekra Mawikalan

0.0061

0.3417

1472

1691

0.0355

0.1293

1441

1687 -B

1440

0.2150

0.1212

1687 -A

0.0484

ROAD

0.0120

1686

0.0120

1685

5.2975

Total

-0.2359

1644-B

Grand Total 57.2402 1644-A

0.4318

[F. No. L- 14014/27/2007 -G.P .]

0.4257

1643-A

0.1845

1642-A

S. B. MANDAL, Under Secy.

0.0225

1642-B

नई दिल्ली, 15 जनवरी , 2008

0.1242

1637

0.0056

1631

0.0055

1630

1629-B

0.0558

1629-A

0.1110

का.आ. 107. भारत सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि हरियाणा राज्य में दादरी - बवाना- नांगल पाइपलाईन परियोजना के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाईन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

0.1864

1626-A

0.4270

1625-A

0.0079

1625-B

0.1361

1624

0.0380

1623

और भारत सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाईन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाईन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

1622

0.0362

0.0989

SH-ROAD

0.0771

1602

0.1683

1601

0.1839

1594

0.0986

1600

अतः अब , भारत सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाईन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का50 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

0.2313

1595 -A

0.0662

1595-B

1539

0.0336

1538

0.0405

1537

0.0213

0.0664

1531

1536

0.0062

0.0965

1532

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध कर दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाईन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में , श्री के. एल. बिशनोई, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड , प्लाट नं. 24 , सेक्टर-16ए, नोएडा, जिला-गौतम बुद्ध नगर-201301 (उत्तर प्रदेश ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 1530

0.0106

अनुसूची

1529

0.0498

जिला तहसील गांव

क्षेत्र ( हेक्टर )

सर्वे नंबर

1533

0.0418

0.0264

1534

0.0054

1527

0.0965

42/7

सोनीपत सोनीपत खुर्ररमपुर

0.1385

1528

41/4

0.0589

0.2340

1506

0.0052

42/8

0.0237

1470

0.1840

41/3

0.0133

1469

0.0240

कच्चा रास्ता

;

0.0081

1468

0.0116

41/2

0.1466

1471

0.0128

कच्चा रास्ता 220

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] 3

5 41/2

130/6/2

सोनीपत सोनीपत

मनोली

0,1404 सोनीपत सोनीपत खुर्ररमपुर

23/23

0.0132

130/5

0.0279 कच्चा रास्ता

0.0020

0.0266

130/7

23/22

0.2053

0.1645

130/4

0.0109

23/21

0.0461

मुरम रास्ता

23/19

130/3

0.1472

0.0371

23/20

0.2129

0.0725

120/23

24/16

0.0118

0.0094

कच्चा रास्ता

23/11

0.0371

0.0018

130/2

24/15

0.2157

120/22

0.1741 24/6

0.0122

कच्चा रास्ता

0.1080

24/7

120/19/1

0.1550

0.0771 24/4

0.0501

120/19/2

0.0158

0.0084

120/20

कच्चा रास्ता

0.1562 24/3

0.2112

120/11

0.1766 24/2

*0.0120

119/15

0.0728

0.0455

120/10

0.0011 19/23

0.2194 19/22

0.2146

119/6

119/7

19/21

0.0928

0.0194 19/19

0.0003

119/5

0.0280

119/4

0.2214 19/20

0.1329

18/16

0.1946

119/3

0.0085

0.0176 18/17

101/24

0.0201

101/23/2

0.0326

0.1533 18/15

0.0477

02129

101/23/1

18/14

ब्रिक रास्ता

0.0230 18/13

0.1156

101/18

0.0629 18/8

0.0981

0.1832

0.2422

18/9

101/19

101/12

0.1264 18/10

0.0253

101/11

0.1019 18/2

0.0250

0.2279

101/10

18/1

0.1900

102/6

0.0646

0.0229 17/5

0.0256

101/1

9/21

0.0039

102/5

0.1854 10/25

0.1735

0.1324 10/24

0.1107

85/25

85/24

0.1030

0.0929 10/17

0.0571 10/18

85/17/1

0.2252

85/17/2

0.0237

0.1499 10/13

0.0193

0.0257

85/18

10/19

85/14

0.0311 10/12

0.0336

85/13/2

0.1359

4.0999

कुल

0.0610

85/13/1

129/13

0.0016

मनोली

85/8/1

0.0037

0.1867

129/12

85/8/2

0.0884 129/11

0.1044

85/9

0.1320

0.1260

129/10

85/2

0.1861

0.0629

130/6/1 221

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 ,1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

5 3

41/7

85/1

0.0553 सोनीपत सोनीपत मनोली

0.1894 सोनीपत सोनीपत मनोली

0.0041

68/22

41/4

0.0988

0.2288

68/21

0.1552

41/3

0.0193

69/25

0.1217

29/23

0.0269

68/20

29/22

0.1162 69/16

0.2372

29/19

0.1754

0.0107

69/17/1

0.0922

29/20

0.0402

68/15

29/12

0.0000 69/14

0.2122

0.2003

29/11

69/13

0.0024

28/15

0.0677 69/7

0.0618

29/10

0.0023

0.1799

69/8

28/6/1

0.0373 69/9

0.0002

0.1582

28/6/2

0.0835

69/3

28/5

0.0031

0.1784

69/2

28/7

0.0570

0.1159

53/22

28/4

0.2125

0.1365

53/21

28/3

0.0278

0.1118

53/20/2

0.0167

22/24

0.0159

52/16/2

0.2322

22/23

0.0162

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0289 53/20/1

0.0202

0.0325

ब्रिक रास्ता

0.0494

52/16/1

22/18

0.0066 52/15

0.0008

22/19

0.1878

0.0263

आस्फाल्ट रास्ता

22/20

0.0051

0.1931

52/15

22/12

0.0516

0.0203

52/16/1

22/11

0.2049 52/14

0.0505

0.0836

22/10

0.0063

52/6/3

0.0004

23/15

0.0679

52/7/2

23/6

0.1809 52/7/3

0.0563

0.0922

23/5

52/7/1

0.0706

0.1639

23/4

0.0008

52/8/2

0.0233

10/24

52/8/1

0.0497

0.0017

कच्चा रास्ता

52/4

0.0058

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0078 52/3

0.2350

0.0975

10/24

40/23

0.0230

23/4

0.0005

0.0220

52/2

0.2290

0.1365

10/23

40/22

40/19

0.0368

0.0784

10/18

40/21

0.0118

11.3916

कुल

0.2181

40/20

26/18

पबसरा

0.0553

0.0074

40/16

0.1063

26/19

0.0452

40/11

26/12

0.1712

0.2048

41/15

26/11

0.0619 41/6

0.0744

0,0028

26/9

0.0130

कच्चा रास्ता

0.2095

26/10

41/14

0.0000

25/6

0,0422 222

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

2 3

26/1

पबसरा

0.0084

[ PART II-SEC . 3( ii )] 3

सोनीपत सोनीपत

25/5

0.2310

0.0511

16/25

25/4

0.0042

16/24

0.1966

16/23

0.1082

16/18

0.1113

16/19

0.2029

0.0089

84-कच्चा रास्ता

0.0069

16/12

83-कच्चा रास्ता 0.0153

16/20

0.0394

0.1946

16/11

0.1427

17/15

17/6

0.0839

17/14

0.0010

177

0.2284

17/4

0.0064

17/8

0.0583

0.1747

17/3

17/2

0.1713

12/22

0.0584

17/1

0.0072

12/21

0.2181

80- कच्चा रास्ता 0.0031

12/20

0.0010

11/25/2

0.0543

0.0232

79-कच्या रास्ता

11/25/1

0.0138

11/16

0.1426

0.1976

11/17

0.0312

11/14

0.0216

11/18

11/13

0.2124

11/12

0.1232

0.1054

11/9

0.0000

0.2237

11/10

0.0138

0.0426

10/6

0.1763

10/5

0.1287

10/4

0.1174

8/24/2

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0494

0.0818

8/23/1

0.0062

8/24/1

0.0876

8/18

4.8352

कुल

जखौली

64/18

0.1073

64/19

0.0307

64/13

0.0163

64/12

0.2113

64/9

0.0205

312

0.0217

64/11

0.0148

0.2190

64/10

64/1

0,0619

63/6

0.0000

63/5

0.1622

0.1343

48/25

48/24

0.1352

48/17

0.1409

371

0.0108

48/18

0.0998

48/13

0.1932

48/12

0.0532

48/8

0.0057

48/9

0.2170

48/10

0.0244

370

0.0123

48/2

0.0146

48/1

0.2182

49/5

0.0046

0.0421

43/21

42/25/2

0.0967

0.1233

42/25/1

42/24

0.0010

42/16

0.0707

0.1728

42/17

0.0215

371/2

42/14

0.1051

42/13

0.0939

42/8/1

0.0496

0.1402

42/8/2

0.0810

42/9

42/3

0.0002

42/2

0.1986

0.0202

42/1

0.0148

371/1

0.0177

27/22

0.2104

27/21

0.0794

27/20

0.0002

28/25

28/16

0.1583

0.1181

28/15/2 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

2 1

1 3

0.0235 सोनीपत सोनीपत सोनीपत सोनीपत जखौली 28/15/1

0.1008

28/14

0.0006

28/8/2

28/7

0.1946

28/4/2

0.0011

0.0353

आस्फाल्ट रास्ता

0.0092

28/8/1

0.0099

28/4/1

28/3

0.2235

0.0051

28/2

0.0360

21/23/3

0.0156

21/23/2

0.1898

21/22

0.0895

21/19/2

21/19/1

0.0208

0.1076

21/20

0.1989

21/11

0.0645

20/15

0.0025

*21/10

0.2094

20/6

0.0167

20/7

0.0305

20/5/2

0.2063

20/4

9/24

0.0925

9/23

0.1457

0.1698

9/18

9/19

0.0672

9/13

0.0020

0.2100

9/12

0.0313

9/11

9/9

0.0157

0.2350

9/10

0.0224

9/1

0.0141

345-कण्वा रास्ता

0.0132

-10/6

0.1660

10/5

0.0121

358- कच्चा रास्ता

0.1156

3/25

0.0977

3/24

3/26

0.0305

0.1770

3/17

0.0368

3/18

3/14

0.0149

0.2096

3/13

0.0136

3/12

0.0518

3/8

0.1850

3/9

0.0711

3/2

7.9379

कुल

62G1/08-9

223

186/1

0.0389 खेबरा

186/2

0.0616

155/22

0.0084

155/22

0.0610

0.1205

304(आस्फाल्ट रास्ता)

0.1701

155/19

155/20

0.0136

155/12

0.1111

155/11

0.0726

155/10

0.1352

155/9

0.0485

0.0580

155/1

0.0949

155/1

0,0285

कच्चा रास्ता

155/2

0.0024

152/21

0.1837

152/20/2

1.52/11

0.1825

151/15

0.0012

151/6

0.0435

152/10

0.1402

152/1

0.0778

151/5

0.1060

122/25

0.1665

121/21

0.0171

122/16/2

0.0594

0.1243

122/16/1

122/15

0.1837

122/6

0.1837

122/5

0.1672

122/4

0.0166

117/24

0.0770

117/25

0.1072

117/17

0.1392

117/16/2

0.0440

117/15

0.0014

117/14

0.1823

117/7

0.1837

117/4

0.1837

88/24

0.1817

88/23

0,0020

88/18

0.0476

88/17

0.1361

88/13

0.1102

88/14

0.0735

0.1695 224

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 3

सोनीपत सोनीपत खेबरा

88/7

0.0142

0.0002

सोनीपत सोनीपत पारली कलां 33/10/2

88/3/1

0.0546

33/1

0.1523

29/21

0.1568 512( कच्चा रास्ता) 0.0518

88/3/2

0.0773

30/25/2

0.0494

29/20/2

81/23/2

0.0947

0.0111

0.0855 81/23/1

0.0890

30/16/1

30/16/2

0.1135 81/18

0.1837

0.1590

30/15/1

81/13

0.1638

30/14

0.0502 81/12

0.0198

30/6

0.0101 81/8

0.1030

30/7

0.1986 81/9/1

0.0300

30/4

0.1532 81/9/2

0.0510

30/3

0.0523 81/2

0.1436

26/24

0.0093 81/3/3

0.0134

0.1824

26/23/2

81/3/2

0.0223

26/23/1

0.0099 81/3/1

0.0042

0.0527

26/18/2

53/23/2

0.0006

0.0930

26/18/1

53/22

0.1841

26/19

0.0620 53/19

0,1832

0.0063

26/13

0.1774

53/12

26/12

0.2080 53/9

0.0426

26/9

0.1444 8/16

0.0053

0.0568

26/10

8/15

0.2096

26/2

0.0086 8/14

0.0001

0.1797

26/1

8/6/1

0.0090

0.0005 8/6/2

0.0744

0.0885

एस एच-11

8/7/1

0.1203

0.0011

25/5/1

8/7/2

0.0615

22/21/1

0.0034 8/4

0.0934

0.2006

23/25

8/3/3

0.0411

22/16

0.1239 8/3/2

0.0411

23/17

0.0868 8/3/1

0.0896

0.0010

23/15/2

6/23

0.1036

0.1938

23/14

0.0205

क्च्चारास्ता

23/7

0.1153 6/22/2

0.1200

0.1099

23/8

6/22/1

0.0210

0.1977

23/3

6/19

0.1138

0.0014

23/2

6/20-

0.1514

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0087 6/11

0.0986

0.0582

10/23

5/15

0.0105

0.2028

10/22

7.5905

0.0610

10/19

कुल

0.0092

कच्चा रास्ता

जज्जाल

72/9

0.1045

सोनीपत सोनीपत

10/21

0.0019 72/10

0.0595

0.1228

10/20

0.0066

72/2

10/11

0.1410 72/1

0.0487

3.9348

कुल

0.2194

कुल 225

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19, 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1 2

0.0253

57/11

सोनीपत सोनीपत दीपालपुर

56/15

0.1307

56/6

0.1341

0.1381

56/7

56/4

.0.1372

56/3

0.1183

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0122

39/23

0.1449

0.0914

39/22

0.0380

आस्फाल्ट रास्ता

0.1347

39/19

0.0111

कच्चा रास्ता

39/20

0.1005

0.1748

39/11

0.0809

40/15

0.1838

40/6

-0.0546

40/7

0.0065

40/5

40/4

0.2212

35/24

0.1219

0.0119

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0008

35/17

0.0777

35/23

35/18

0.2081

0.1045

35/13

0.1056

35/12

0.2089

35/9

0.0815

35/2

0.0012

35/10

0.1287

35/1

0.0174

कच्चा रास्ता

0.1874

21/21

.0.0054

22/25

0.0612

21/20

0.1422

22/16

0.0016

22/15/2

0.0309

कच्चा रास्ता

22/15/1

0.1728

0.0079

22/14

0.0566

22/6

0.1497

22/7

सोनीपत सोनीपत माकीमपुर

0.2002

22/4

0.0061

22/3

0.0620

16/14

16/23

0.1443

16/18

0.2018

5 3

16/19

0.0045

0.0676 16/13

0.1387 16/12

0.2031 16/9

0.0031 16/10

16/2

0.0735 16/1

0.1328

0.1976 11/21

0.0421 कच्चा रास्ता

0.0020 12/25

0.0549 11/20

0.0132 12/16/3

0.0686 12/16/2

0.0341 12/16/1

12/15

0.2051 12/14

0.0011 12/6

0.0860 12/7/2

0.0466

0.0737 12/7/1

12/4/2

0.1304

0.0753 12/4/1

12/3

0.0005 6/24

0.0926 6/23

0.1137 6/18

0.2027

0.0715 6/13

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0313 6/19

0.0001

0.1069 6/12

0.1380 6/9/1

0.0684 6/9/2

0.0000 6/10

6/2/2

0.0960 6/2/1

0.01 04

0,0999 6/1

0.0001 4/22

4/21

0.1704 कच्चा रास्ता

0.0051 4/20

0.0146

7.3133 कुल

0.0168 27/25

0.1178 26/20

27/16

0.0605 26/11

0.0051

0.0093 कच्चा रास्ता

0.1389 27/15/2 226

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008 /PAUSA 29, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 2

5 27/15/1

0.0624

10/3/1

0.0373

सोनीपत सोनीपत

माकीमपुर

सोनीपत सोनीपत माकीमपुर

27/6

0.1361

2/23/2

0.1228

0.0629

2/23/1

277

0.0674

27/5

0.0049

0.0128

2/18

0.1064

27/4/2

0.0528

2/19

0.1226

0.0872

27/4/1

0.0001

24/24/2

4.1590

कुल

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0080

0.0511

89/19

सोनीपत सोनीपत

नन्दनौर

0.1578

24/24/1

0.1742

89/12

24/23

0.0234

0.0167

89/11

0.0066

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0376

89/9

0.0660

24/17

89/10

0.1883 24/18/1

0.1216 .

89/1

0.1890

0.0007

24/18/2

88/5

0.0140 24/14

0.0014

0.0359

79/21

0,1910

24/13

0.0074

कच्चा रास्ता

24/8

0.1816

80/25

0.1557 24/9

0.0020

0.0106

कच्चा रास्ता

0.1228

24/3

80/16

0.1888

0.0670

24/2

80/17

0.0161

0.0259

13/23

80/15

0.0394 13/22

0.1679

80/14

0.1509

0.1792

13/19

80/7

0.1838

0.0082

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0125

80/8

0.1343

13/12/2

0.0419

80/4

0.0427

13/12/1

0.1836

80/3

0.0196

13/11

0.0194

63/23

0.0449

13/9/2

0.0164

993कच्चा रास्ता 13/9/1

0.0073

0.1617

63/23

13/10

0.1440

0.0261

63/22

0.0172

13/1/2

0.0252

63/18

13/1/1

0.1871

63/19

0.1837 14/5

0.0071

63/12

0.1748

0.0593

11/21

63/11

0.0285 10/25/2

0.1184

0.0242

63/9

0.0259

10/25/1

0.1901

63/10

0.1322

10/16

63/1

0.1586

0.0286

आस्फाल्टेड रास्ता

0.0349

62/5

10/17

0.0592

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0104

0.0510

10/15/1

0.0137

56/21

10/14

0.1558

57/25

0.1924

0.1700

10/7

57/16

0.1722

0.0231

10/4

57/17

0.0429

0.0304

कच्चा रास्ता

57/15

0.0131

0.0159

10/8/1

57/14

0.0984

0.1300

10/3/2

3.2842

कुल 227 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii)]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

5 3

0.0096

0.0946 कच्चा रास्ता

सोनीपत सोनीपत मोरथाल खास 184/1

सोनीपत सोनीपत असदपुर

183/6

0.0002 60/14

0.0726

183/5

60/7

0.1161

0.1517

60/8

0.0695

0.1817

146/25

कच्चा रास्ता

60/4

0.0274

0.0029

0.2031

146/16

60/3

0.0890 61/23

0.0009

0.1444

146/24

0.0698

61/22

146/17

0.1202 61/18

0.0032

0.0418

आस्फाल्टेड रास्ता 61/19

0.2020

146/14

0.1798. 61/12

146/13

0.0069

0.1409

146/7

0.0589 61/11

0.0776

61/9

0.0016

146/8

0.0913 61/10

0.0271

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0248

146/3

1.1761

0.2180 कुल

146/2

0.0266 मोरथाल खास 225/11

0.0024

0.0194

137/23

225/10

0.1628

137/22

0.2223

0.1319

225/1

0.0659

137/19

224/5

0.0492

0.0024

137/21

0.0038

188/21

0.1305

137/20

0.0344

कच्चा रास्ता

0.2022

137/11

189/25/1

0.1512

0.0559

136/15

189/25/2

0.0347

0.0072

137/10

0.0140

189/25/3

136/6

0.1785 189/16

0.1301

0.1163

136/5

189/17

0.0557

136/4

0.1408

0.0257

कच्चा. रास्ता

106/24

0.1605

0.0044

189/15

0.0163

106/23/2

189/14

0.1950

106/23/1

0.0475 189/7

0.0980

106/17

0.0019 कच्चा रास्ता

0.0144

106/18/1

0.1206

0.0103

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0410

106/18/2

0.0707

189/8

0.0011

106/19

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0211

0.0283

कच्चा रास्ता

189/4

0.0003

106/13

0.0421 189/3

0.2091

0.1368

106/12

184/23

0.1138

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0321 184/22

0.0944

0.0700

106/9

184/18

0.0005

106/11

0.0020 184/19

0.2061

0.1040

106/10

184/12

0.1091

0.0428

आस्फाल्टेड रास्ता

0.0038

184/20

106/1

0.1314 184/11/1

0.1016

0.0961

107/5

0.0038

184/11/2

0.0317

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0264

102/25

0.1458

0.1785

184/10 228

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

1 सोनीपत सोनीपत मोरथाल खास 102/24

0.1269

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 3

72/15

0.2032

सोनीपत सोनीपत

102/17

0.1485

102/18

0.1173

102/13

0.1643

102/12

0.1039

102/9

0.1671

102/2

0.0003

0.0869

102/10

102/1

0.1816

101/5

0.0856

79/25

0.1685

0.0219

कच्चा रास्ता (353 )

0.0028

79/24/2

79/24/1

0.0718

79/16

0.0007

79/17/1

0.0133

0.0466

79/17/2

79/17/3

0.1477

79/18

0.0411

0.0325

कच्चा रास्ता

79/14/1

0.0088

79/13

0.1261

347

0.0614

(आस्फाल्टेड यस्ता)

79/12

0,0640

79/8

0.0023

79/9/2

0.0390

79/9/1

0.1758

79/2

0.0040

79/10/1

0.0536

79/10/2

0.0021

79/1

0.1969

80/5

0.0333

74/21

0.0065

73/25

0.1599

0.0248

कच्चा यस्ता

73/24

0.1811

73/23

0.0501

0.0514

कच्चा रास्ता

73/17

0.0138

73/18

0.1240

73/19

0.1928

73/12

0.0267

73/11/1

0.0140

0.0793

73/11/2

मोरथाल खास

72/14

0.0443

72/6

0.0406

72/7

0.1397

0.0522

कच्चा रास्ता

72/4

0.0042

72/8/2

0.0633

72/8/1

0.0177

72/3

0.1401

72/2

0.2198

72/1

0.1388

62/21

0.0795

71/5

0.0035

63/25

0.2311

63/16

0.0036

आस्फाल्टेड रास्ता 0.0273

63/24

0.0358

845(कच्चा रास्ता) 0.0152

63/17

0.1506

63/18

0.2093

63/19/1

0.0533

63/18/2

0.0029

63/12

0.1503

845 (कच्चा रास्ता) 0.0131

63/19/2

0.0162

63/11/3

0.0271

63/11/2

0.0469

63/11/1

0.1117

63/10

0.0584

64/15

0.0035

64/6

0.2311

0.0016

647/2

64/7/1

0.0039

64/4/2

0.0823

0.0216

64/5/2

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0275

64/4/1

0.1385

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0283

64/4/3

0.0348

64/3

0.0494

0.0276

कच्चा रास्ता

48/24

0.0013

48/23

0.1567

48/22

0.0398

12.4980

कुल 229 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

5 1

0.1644

0.0613 36/22

25/25

सोनीपत सोनीपत

सोनीपत सोनीपत हस्सनपुर

हस्सनपुर

36/19

0.0812

24/20/2

0.0031 36/21/1

0.0005

25/16

0.1880

25/17

36/20/2

0.0190

0.1526

0.0767

25/14

36/20/1

0.1714

0.0506

25/18

0.0041 36/11

0.0065

कच्चा रास्ता

25/13/2

0.1332

0.0001

37/16

0.0804

25/13/1

0.2035

37/15

0.1345

25/12

37/6/3

0.0507

25/9

0.0925 37/14

0.0053

25/11

0.0018

0.2306

37/7

25/10/2

0.1935 37/8/2

0.0021

25/10/1

0.0267. 37/8/1

0.0280

25/1

0.0000 37/4

0.0141

आस्फाल्टेड रास्ता 0.0235 37/3

0.2221

26/6/2

0.0011 37/2

0.0538

26/6/1

0.0893

0.0200

26/7

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0000 कच्चा रास्ता

0.0202

26/5/2

0.1075 34/23

0.0000

0.0048

26/5/1

34/22

0.1564

26/4

0.2255 34/21

0.1260

26/3/2

0.0247 34/20

0.1147

26/3/1

0.0718

0.0151

कच्चा रास्ता

19/24/1

0.0011 कच्चा रास्ता

0.0151

19/23

0.1229 33/16

0.1529

0.2198

19/22

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0135

0.0025

19/19

0.0015

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0832

19/21

33/15

0.0704

19/20

0.1422 33/14

0.2048

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0066 33/17

0.0003

18/16

0.2083 33/7

0.0463

18/15

0.0097 कच्चा रास्ता

0.0053

0.0584

18/17

33/13

0.0027

18/14

0.1639 33/8

0.2136

18/13/2

0.1097

0.0587

0.1028

18/13/1

33/9

0.0038

18/8

0.0111 33/2

0.2160

फिल्डचेनल

0.0067 33/1

0.0241

18/12

0.0509 फिल्डचेनल

0.0098

18/9

0.1172 24/22

0.0160

18/10

0.1530 24/21/2

0,0653

0.0357 आस्फाल्ट रास्ता 0.0238

लाइन्डकेनाल 0.0302

0.1324

24/21/1

6.3651

कुल 230.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

1 सोनीपत गन्नौर भगान

0.0549

कच्चा रास्ता/100

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii )]

5 भगान

69/25

सोनीपतः गन्नौर

64/15/2

0.0867

64/16/1

0.0925

64/16/2

0.0173

64/17/1

0.0705

64/14/2

0.0035

64/17/2

0.1374

64/18

0.2144

64/19

0.1641

64/22/1

0.0472

64/20

0.2064

64/21

0.0042

65/16/2

0.0304

65/16/1

0.0043

0.1868

NH- 1 (जी.टी. रोड)

65/24

0.1992

0.0983

65/23/2

65/23/1

0.1003

65/22

0.1984

क्च्चारास्ता

0.0101

65/21

0.1916

66/25

0.2111

0.0101

क्च्चारास्ता

66/24

0.1882

66/23

0.1980

66/22

0.1960

66/21

0.2101

67/25

0.1887

0.2089

67/24

मेटल यस्ता

0.0180

67/23

0.1780

67/22

0.2040

0.1919

67/21

67/20

0.0028

68/25

0.1847

68/16

0.0204

68/24

0.1603

68/17

0.0199

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0497

68/18

0.0039

68/23

0.1648

68/22

0.1458

68/19

0.0584

68/21/1

0.1145

68/20

0.0637

कच्चा यस्ता

0.0352

0.1192

69/16/2

0.0740

69/24

0.1162

69/17/3

0.0779

69/23

0.1202

69/18

0.0812

0.0319

69/22

69/19

0.2234

0.0476

69/20

69/12

0,0070

0.2012

69/11

70/15

0.0744

69/10

0.0010

70/6

0.1856

70/7/1

0.0992

70/7/2

0.0010

70/4

0.1652

55/24

0.0000

0.0854

70/3/3

0.1736

55/23

55/22

0.1344

55/19

0.1238

0.0363

55/20/1

0.0367

आस्फाल्टेड रास्ता-110

55/20/2

0.1002

0.0793

55/11

54/16

0.0001

0.2025

54/15

54/6

0.0900

0.0199

54/7/1

54/7/2

0.1668

0,0456

54/4/1

54/8

0.0099

54/3/2

0.0629

0.0165

कच्चा रास्ता

54/3/1

0.1125

54/26

0.0036

54/2

0.2079

48/22/2

0.0080

54/1

0.0823

48/21

0.1322

53/5

0.0000

49/25

0.1992

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0107

49/24/2

0.1606

49/17/1

0.0128 231

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29, 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

0.0280

भगान

49/17/2

सोनीपत गन्नौर सोनीपत गन्नौर

0.0110

49/24/1

49/23

0.0349

49/18

0.1764

0.1996

49/19

0.0110

49/26

0.0005

49/12

0.1215

49/20

0.0825

49/11/2

0.0105

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0062

50/16/1

0.2065

50/15

0.1974

50/14

50/13

0.0702

50/7

0.0144

50/8

0.1338

50/12

0.0000

0.1091

50/9

कुल

10.4985

61/9

0.1055

राजपुर

61/10

0.1620

61/1/2

0.0059

61/1/1

0.0482

62/6/1

0.0242

0.1867

62/5/2

62/4

0.2081

62/3/2

0.0629

62/3/1

0:0410

0.0024

59/24

62/2

0.0068

0.1052

59/23

0.2176

59/22

0.1474

59/21

58/25

0.0092

0.0696

59/20

58/16

0.1878

जे.आर. डीस्टीब्युटरी 0.0639

58/17

0.1297

58/14

0.0434

58/18

0.0506

0.1499-

58/13

58/19

0.0062

0.1960

58/12

0.1982

58/11

0.0112

कच्चा रास्ता

0.1177

57/15/1

62G1/08-10

57/15/2

0.0751 राजपुर

0.0361

57/14/2

57/14/1

0.1657

0.2074

57/13

57/12

0.1588

57/9

0.0106

0.1625

57/11

0.0638

57/10

56/15

0.1003

56/14

0.0135

0.1075

56/6

56/7

0.2070

56/8

0.0398 .

56/3

0.0174

0.0445

आस्फाल्टेड रास्ता

0.0020 46/21

47/25

0.1417

47/16

0.0222

47/24

0.0201

47/17

0.1135

47/18

0.0140

0.0611

आस्फाल्टेड रास्ता

48/5

0.1284 48/4

0.0267

34/25

0.0051

आस्फाल्टेड रास्ता 0.0430

34/24

0.1480

34/23

0.1909

0.0306

34/18

0.0018

डब्ल्यू.बी.

(फिल्डचेनल)

34/22

0.0995

34/19

0.0963

34/21

0.0620

34/20

0.0749

0.1590

बी.जी. रेलवे

33/16/2

0.1084

33/16/1

0.0213

0.2046

33/17 .

33/18

0.1884

0.0511

33/13

0.0077

33/19/1

33/12

0.2272

33/9/2

0.0099

33/11

0.0439

33/10/1

0.0197

33/10/2

0.0513 232

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008 /PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2

5 गन्नौर

सोनीपत

0.1256

33/10/3

सोनीपत गन्नौर

50/19/2

0.1913 राजपुर

राजलु

50/19/1

0.0053 32/6/1

0.1134

50/20

0.1181 32/6/2

0.0027

0.1214

50/11

32/5

0.1287

51/15/2

0.1039 33/1

0.0004

0.0964

51/15/1

32/4

0.2321

50/14/3

0.0152 32/3

0.0373

51/6

0.0325

51/7/1

0.1115 कच्चा रास्ता

0.0519

51/7/2

0.0805 30/24

0.0017

51/8

0.1572 30/23

0.0757

नाला

0.0391 30/22

0.0104

2.1069

कुल

7.1213

कुल

पांची जतन नाला

0.0470 8/7

0.0030

भुरी

73/8

0.0001 8/8/1

0.0212

73/9

0.1743 8/8/2

0.0715

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0304

0.0755

8/3

0.1125

73/10

73/1

8/9

0.1435

0.0007

74/5

0.0987

0.2091

8/2/1

44/25

0.1836 8/2/2

0.0141

44/16

0.0011 8/1

0.0612

44/24

0.0712 6/22/2

0.0048

44/17

0.2014 6/21/1

0.0021

44/18/1

0.0500 6/21/2

0.1119

44/14

0.0062 6/20

0.0031

44/13

0.2201 42

0.0294

44/12

0.0369

44/8

0.0114

0.6075

कुल

44/9

0.2319

0.0407

57/17/2

राजलु

44/10/1

0.0228

0.0394

57/17/1

44/2

0.0225 57/18

0.0775

44/1

0.2071 57/14

0.0278

कच्चा रास्ता .

0.0000

45/5

0.0141 57/13

0.1211

0.0186

41/21

57/12

0.1751

40/25

0.2171 57/9

0.0864

40/16

0.0443 57/11/1

0.0002

फिल्ड कच्च रास्ता 0.0213 57/10/4

0.0102

40/24

0.0023

0.0050

डब्ल्यूबी.

0.1905

40/17

0.0501

57/10/3

40/14

0.0842 57/10/2

0.0736

फिल्ड

0.0210

0.0552

57/10/1

कच्चा रास्ता

57/1

0.0541

40/13

0.1431 58/6

0.0059

40/8

0.1296

40/9/1

0.1265 58/5

0.1204

40/9/2

0.0007 50/23

0.0779

40/2

0.1488 50/18

0.0026

40/1/2

0.1170 50/22

0.0391 233

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

43/22

0.0351

0.0776 सोनीपत

सोनीपत गन्नौर पांची, जतन 13/21/2

गन्नौर उदेसीपुर

0.0244

43/21

0.0004

40/1/1

(जारी)

0.0334

नाला

0.0618

13/21/1

0.1393

27/15

0.0281

14/25/2

0.0363

27/6

0.0052

14/25/1

0.0086

27/14

3.3527.

कुल

0.1775

27/7

62/21

0.0170

0.0041 उदेसीपुर

कच्चा रास्ता

62/25

0.1027

0.0294

27/8

0.0889

61/16/2

0.0181

27/4

0.0537

61/16/1

02197

27/3

0.0004

0.0626

27/2

0.0046

61/17/2

0.0031

25/23

61/17/1

0.0793

0.1895

25/22

0.0321

61/17/3

0.1078

25/21

0.0208

61/14/3

25/20

0.1444

0.1183

61/14/2

24/16

0.1560

0.0263

61/14/1

0.0939

24/15

0.0009

61/13/2

24/14

0.2009

0.0925

61/13/1

0.0056

24/13

61/8

0.1289

0.0534

24/7

0.0503

61/8

0.2233

24/8

61/9

0.0684

0.0236

24/9

0.0113

कच्या रास्ता

0.0232

24/3

0.0010

61/3/2

0.2228

24/2

0.2047

61/2

0.0540

24/1

0.0532

61/1

0.0440

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0048

46/22

0.0010

14/22

0.2168

46/21

0.1525

14/21

46/20/2

0.0114

0.1032

15/25

0.0373

47/25

0.1552

15/16

0.2233

.47/16

0.1451

15/17

47/17

0.0242

0.1070

15/14

0.0209

47/15

0:1901

15/13

0.1086

47/14/2

0.0032

15/12

0.1155

47/14/1

0.0620

15/8

0.0139

47/13

0.2022

15/9

47/7/3

0.0332

ड्रेईन

0.0178 47/8/5

0.0317

0.0289

15/2

0.0318

47/8/4

0.0184

15/10

0.0054

47/8/3

0.2062

15/1

0.0275

47/8/2

0.0026

10/21

0.1230

47/8/1

0.0227

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0065

47/9

0.0477

16/5

47/3

0.0482

0.2064

9/25

0.2088

47/2

0.0862

9/24

0.0018

47/1 234

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 1

9/16

0.0002

गन्नौर भदेत

25/17/2

0.0357 सोनीपत

सोनीपत

गन्नौर उदेसीपुर

9/17

0.1661

25/16

0.2172 9/18

0.1343

25/25

0.0220 9/13

0.1178

आस्फोल्टेड रास्ता 0.0380

0.1810

9/12

24/20/2

0.0138

0.0015

24/21

9/11

0.1449

0.0711

24/22

9/9

0.0164 9/10

0.2147

2.6471

कुल

9/1

0.0413

70/24

0.0649

पुरखास

0.0095

8/6

0.0024

70/23

8/5

0.2195

0.0614

70/17

8/4

-0.0085

70/18

0.1982

0.0435

7/25

70/19

0.0011 7/24

0.1821

70/13/2

0.0661 7/17

0.0005

0.0028

70/13/1

7.9338

कुल

70/12

0.2067 कच्चा रास्ता 0.0251

भदेत

70/11/1

0.0051 16/7

0.0242

70/9

0.0517

0.0031

16/6

70/10

0.1876 कच्चा रास्ता

70/1/2

0.0316

0.0133

0.0159

0.0490

16/15

फिल्डचेनल

0.1224

17/11/2

0.0319

कच्चा रास्ता

71/6

17/20

0,0016

0.1088

0.0193

0.2169

17/19

71/5/2

0.0142

17/22

71/5/1

0.1488

0.0286

64/25

0.0856 17/1 8/2

0.0134

0.0001 17/18/1

71/4

0.1892

0.1719

64/24

17/23

64/17

17/24

0.1608

0.0921 17/25

0.0035

64/18

0.1236

0.0397 26/4/1

0.0448

आस्फाल्टेड रास्ता

0.0255

0.1144 26/4/2

64/13

0.0252

क्च्चारास्ता

0.0171 26/5/1

0.2004

'फिल्डचेनल

0.0164 26/5/2

26/6

0.1268

64/12

0.0033

0.1062

64/9

0.0362

डिस्ट्री

64/10

0.1601

0.0450

25/1

0.1131 25/10

0.1487.

64/1

63/5

0.1541

0.0386

25/9/1

0.1523

25/9/2

0.1208

49/25

0.1432

0.0402

49/24/2

25/12

25/8

0.0153

49/24/1

0.0082

49/17/1

0.0266 25/13

0.2159

49/17/2

0.0824 25/14

0.1116

49/18

0.1639 25/17/1

0.0839 :

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

235

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

5 49/13

0.1112

14/11

सोनीपत गन्नौर

0.0035

सोनीपत गन्नौर

0.1579

49/12

पुरखास (जारी)-

13/16

0.0345

पुरखास (जरी)-

49/11

0.0021

13/15

0.2202 49/9

0.1091

13/14

0.0089 49/10

0.1667

13/6

0.0473 कच्चा रास्ता

0.0085

13/7/1

0.1924 49/1/1

0.0943

13/4

0.1131 50/5

0.1683

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0138 39/25

0.1105

13/3

0.1152 39/24

0.1280

4/23/2

0.1345 39/17

0.1744

4/23/1

0.0400 39/19

0.0660

4/22

0.0617 कच्चा रास्ता

0.0051

4/18/2

0.0031 39/14

0.0015

4/19

0.2014 कच्चा रास्ता

0.0094

4/20

0.0055 39/13

0.1613

4/12/2

0.0480 39/12

0.0515

4/11

0.2179 कच्चा रास्ता

0.0104

4/10/2

0.0729 39/8

0.0031

फिल्डचेनल

0.0057 39/9

0.2385

5/15

0.0002 39/10

0.0027

5/6

0.1681 39/2

0.0632

5/5

0.1467 39/1

0.1818

5/4

0.0999 24/21

0.0977

2/24

0.0459 फिल्डचेनल

0.0178

फिल्ड चेनल

0.0058 25/25

0.1293

8.6492

कुल

25/16/2

0.0987

सोनीपत गन्नौर सींगखेरा

50/24

0.1333 25/16/1

0.0762

50/23

0.0318 25/17/2

0.0191

50/17

0.0202 25/17/1

0.0491

50/18

0.2150 25/15

0.0014

50/19/1

0.0086 25/14

0.2083

50/13

0.0462 25/13

0.0223

50/12/2

0.1225 25/7

0.0234

50/12/1

0.0767 25/8

0.1742

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0080 25/3

0.1167

50/9

0.0945 25/2/1

0.0510

0.0192

कच्चा यस्ता

आस्फाल्टेड रास्ता 0.0303

50/10

0.1053 फिल्डचेनल

0.0120

50/1

0.1916 25/2

0.0706

51/5/2

0.0434 14/22

0.1410

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0091 फिल्डचेनल

0.0049

49/21

0.0066 14/21/2

0.0091

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0040 14/21/1

0.1010

48/25

0.2180 14/20

0.1711

48/24

0.0106 कच्चा रास्ता

0.0288

48/16

0.0342 436

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008 /PAUSA 29 , 1929

5 2

गन्नौर सींगखेरा

0.0154

0.2050

कच्चा रास्ता

48/17

सोनीपत

सोनीपत गन्नौर

0.1562

20/18

48/14/1

0.0916

सींगखेरा (जारी) -

(जारी) -

0.0922

20/19

48/13/2

0.0444

20/12

0.2014 48/13/1

0.1104

0.0355

20/11

48/8

0.1566

0.0131

20/9

0.0857

48/9

0.2090

20/10

0.0000

48/3

0.0302

20/1

0.0440

48/2/2

0.0257

कच्चा रास्ता

48/2/1

0.1631

0.0066

21/6

0.0331

48/1

0.2270

21/5

0.0090

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0013

15/25

0.0125

36/22/1

0.0694

21/4/2

36/21

0.2041

0.0156

21/4/1

36/20

0.0383

0.1691

15/24

0.0243

कच्चा रास्ता

0.1692

15/23

0.0043

37/25/2

0.0263

कच्चा रास्ता

0.1820

37/16

15/22

0.0230

0.0000

37/15/4

0.0178

15/18/2

0.0013

37/15/3

0.0028

कच्चा रास्ता

37/15/2

0.0032

0.0854

15/19/1

37/15/1

0.1263

0.1075

15/19/2

0.1225

37/14/3

0.1474

15/20

0.0118

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0859

15/11

0.1702

37/7

0.0018

14/16

0.0458

37/8/1

0.2176

14/15.

0.0077

37/4

0.0498

14/14/2

37/3/2

0.0143

0.0669

14/14/1

37/3/1

0.2088

0.1225

14/7

0.0107

37/2/2

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0122 32/23

0.0390

0.0485

14/8/2

0.1987

32/22

0.0184

कच्चा रास्ता

32/21

0.0003

14/8/1

0.1481

0.0839

32/19

0.0602

14/9/1

32/20

0.1550

0.0078

14/3

0.1231

32/11/2

0.1533

14/2

0.0016

31/15/2

0.1777

14/1

0.0256

आस्फाल्ट रास्ता

7/21

0.0364

0.0252

32/11/1

0.0137

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0830

31/15/1

0.0162

13/5

31/6

0.1831

8/25/2

0.1578 कच्चा रास्ता

0.0091

0.0480

8/25/1

0.0588

31/5

8/25/26

0.0109

0.1986

31/4

0.1272

8/24

0.0958

20/24

8/17/2

0.0995 कच्चा रास्ता

0.0146

0.0004

8/23

0.1120

20/23 237

भारत का राजपुत्र : जनवरी 19, 2008/पौष 29, 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

5 3

15/7

0.0111 8/18

गन्नौर

ग़नौर मोहम्मद‌पुर

सोनीपत

0.2218 सोनीपत

0.0639

8/19

0.0334 सींगखेरा (जारी)-

-15/13

माजरा ( जारी )

8/13

0.0065

15/8

0.2068 8/12

0.1659

15/3

0.0000

0.1742

15/9

8/11

0.0917

0.0276

कच्चा रास्ता

15/2

0.1563

0.0390

8/10/2

0.1533

15/1

0.0131

9/15

12/21

0.0947.

0.1978

9/6

0.2049

11/25

0.1345

9/7

0.0149

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0299

कच्चा रास्ता

11/24

0.0101

0.0676

9/4

0.0335

11/16

0.0079

9/8

0.2211

11/17

0.0080

0.0401 कच्चा रास्ता

11/18

0.1398

9/3/2

0.0116

11/14

0.0605

0.0241 9/3/1

11/13/2

0.0104

0.1856 कच्चा रास्ता

0.0054

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0002

11/8

0.0026

0.0880 2/23

11/12

0.0847

0.1761 9/2

11/9/2

0.0854

0.0007 2222

11/9/1

0.0540

2/22/1

0.0890

11/10/2

0.2102

2/21

0.0764

0.0241

2/20

0.0549 1/25

0.1558

0.0204

203/कच्चारास्ता

0.0405

1/16

10/5

0.0165 1/24

0.1517

10/6

0.0462

0.3463.

0.0722

दिल्ली ब्रान्च वेस्टर्न सरधाना डिस्ट्रीब्युटरी

0.1266

1/23

यमुनाकेनाल

10/3

0.0078

0.0180

76/कच्चा रास्ता

10.8543

10/8

0.1668 कुल

0.2433

10/9

0.0349

14/23

गन्नौर

सोनीपत

0.0363

10/10

0.0109

28/3

मोहम्मदपुर माजरा

0.1963

10/1

0.0580

28/2

0.0129

10/2

0.1738

14/22

0.0213

235/कच्चा रास्ता

0.1547

14/21

0.0728

6/21

0,0930

14/20

0.1486

7/25

0.1628

15/16/2'

0.1642

7/16

0.0433

15/16/1

0.0661

7/17

0.0047

15/17/1

0.0022

7/15

0.0010

15/17/2

0.2113

7/14

0.0234

15/15/1

0.0069

7/13

0.0075

15/15/2

0.0138

7/8

0.0206

96/डेइन

0.0436

חר

0.2152

15/14

4.8501

0.0144

कच्चा रास्ता

कुल 238

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/ PAUSA 29 , 1929

5 4

0.1887

0.1637

28/8

60/8

सोनीपत गन्नौर तेवडी

0.1472

0.1199

28/3

60/3

(जारी)-

0.0607

28/2/2

60/2

0.1658

19/23

0.0044

0.0042

60/1

0.0021

28/2/1

58/21

0.1067

19/22

0.2044 58/22

0.0673

0.1241

19/19

0.1146

भैनसवाल डिस्ट्रीब्युटरी

0.0006

0.1008

19/12

57/25

57/16

0.1641

0.0865

19/20

0.0015

57/17/2

0.1278

19/11/3

0.0872

57/17/1

0.0558

19/11/2

0.2043

57/14

0.0233

0.0225

57/13

0.0803

19/10

0.0225

57/7

0.0155

कच्चा रास्ता

0.2134

57/8

0.1175

18/6

0.0011

57/9

0.0001

18/4

0.2041

0.0715

18/5

57/3

0.0091

कच्चा रास्ता

57/2

0.1589

0.0623

11/25

0.0093

कच्चा रास्ता

0.1134

11/24

0.1542

44/22

0.0239

आस्फाल्टेड रास्ता

0.0821

44/21/1

11/17

0.2145

0.2037

44/20

0.0109

11/18

0.0210

44/11

0.0529

11/14

0.0311

45/16

0.1390

11/13

0.2158

45/15

0.0143

0.0027.

कच्चारास्ता

45/14

0.1827

11/8

0.0551

45/6

0.1636

11/3

0.1768

45/7

0.0441

0.1431

45/4

ड्रेइन

0.0985

45/3

0.1302

3/23

0.0395

0.0372 115

कच्चा रास्ता

0.1644

0.0163 38/23

3/22

0.0331

38/22

0.0784

3/19

0.0147

38/18

0.0852

3/18

38/19

0.2108

0.0737

3/12

38/12

0:1074

0.0194

3/13

0.1046

38/11

7.6635

कुल

0.1768

38/10

0.0471

101/12

गन्नौर

सोनीपत

पुगथला

0.3594

डोभेटा डिस्ट्रीब्यूटरी

0.0639

101/9/2

0.0844

28/25

0.1185

101/9/1

0.0153

28/24

0.1117

101/2/2

0.0372

28/16

0.0607

101/2/1

0.1817

28/17

0.0093

बच्चारास्ता

28/14

0.1861

0.1991

99/22

28/13

0.0301

0.1533

99/19

0.0204

28/7 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

गन्नौर

99/20

0.0141 सोनीपत सोनीपत गन्नौर पुगथला.

99/12

0.0905

0.0867

99/11

0.1554

99/10

0.0461

99/1

0.1963

99/2

0.0002

80/21

0.1844

80/25

0.0012

80/20

0.1162

80/16/2

0.0132

0.0500

80/16/1

81/15

0.1554

80/11

0.0218

81/16

0.2124

81/5/1

0,1532

81/5/2

0.0003

81/4/1

0.0381

0.0091

76/24/2

0.0150

129

76/25/1

0.0173

0.1557

76/24/1

76/17

0.1589

0.1341

76/14

0.0999

76/13

0.0000

76/7

76/8

0.2090

0.0069

199

0.0027

76/3/2

76/3/1

0.1052

76/2

0.0869

0.0012

57/23/1

0.1983

57/22

0.1374

57/19/2

57/20

0.0218

150

0.0111

0.0332

57/19/1

57/12

0.0186

57/11

0.1679

0.0598

57/10/3

0.0995

57/10/2

0.0248

57/10/1

57/1

0.1728

58/5/1

0.0269

0.0474

52/21

51/25

0.1455

0.1607

51/16/1

51/16/2

0.0242

62GI/ 08-11

239

5 3

51/15

0.1939 पुगथला

0.0043

51/14/2

51/7/1

0.0249

0.0594

51/6/2

0.0271

आस्फाल्टेड रास्ता

0.0638

51/7/2

0.0010

51/6/1

51/4/2/2

0.0963

51/4/2/1/1 . 0.0898

0.0037

51/4/1

34/24/1

0.0296

34/24/2 (आस्फाल्टेड

0.0272

रास्ता)

34/24/3

0.1110

24/25/1

0.0262

34/25/2

0.0219

34/16

34/17

0.2053

0.1099

34/14/1

0,0898

34/13

0.0002

34/7/2

0.1193

34/8/1

34/13/2

0.0341

34/8/2

0.0567

0.1278

34/3

0.0853

34/2/2

25/23

0,0007

25/22

0.2075

0.0211

कण्वा रास्ता

25/19

0.0981

0.0884

25/20

0.0001

25/12

25/11/2

0.1382

0.0674

25/11/1

0.0961

25/10

0.0116

कच्चारास्ता

0.0440

24/6/2

0.0555

24/6/1

0.2088

24/5

0.0010

24/4/2

0.0573

11/25/2

0.0320

11/25/1

0.1195

11/24

11/17

0.0331

7.5401

कुल 240

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

1 सोनीपत सोनीपत मनोली

52/14

0.0641

[PART II-SBC. 3 ( 11) ]

45/11

0.0822

सोनीपत सोनीपत

52/7/3

0.0265

52/13/1

0.1270

52/8/2

0.0793

52/12/1

0.1283

52/9/2

0.0834

52/11/2

0.0288

52/10/2

0.0779

52/11/1

0.0918

0.1416

51/15

51/6

0.0635

51/14/2

0.0955

51/14/1

0.0455

51/7

0.0616

51/13

0.1442

51/8

0.0633

51/12

0.1340

51/9

0.0593

0.1373

51/11

51/10

0.0539

0,1756

50/15

50/6

0.0435

50/14

0.1739

50/7

0.0197

50/13

0.1861

50/8

0.0081

50/12

0.2064

50/9

0.0000

50/11

0.2064

49/15

0.1914

49/14

0.2090

49/13

0,1821

354

0.0150

49/12

0.2039

49/11

0.2013

48/15

0.2053

48/14

0.2006

48/13

0.1989

48/12/2

0.1138

357

0.041 5

48/12/1

0.0672

48/11/2

0.0780

48/11/1

0.1143

47/15/1

0.1863

47/14

0.2112

47/13

0.1987

47/12

0.2048

0.1116

47/11

46/15

0.0005

5.6619

कुल

एबसरा

44/15

0.2093

44/14/2

0.0588

0.0266

66(पक्का रास्ता)

44/14/1

0.1143

44/13/2

0.0812

44/13/1

0.1142

44/12

0.1983

0.1971

44/11

43/15

0.0997

43/14

0.0081

बुल

1.1897

0.0920

115

हंसपुर

3/10

0.0006

2/15

0.0668

2/14

0.1778

2/13

0.1967

2/12

0.0571

0.5910 जखाउली

0.1036

118/12

0.2014

118/11

119/15

0.2206

119/14

0.1639

119/13

0.2315

119/12

0.1760

0.2260

119/11

120/15/2

0.0174

0.1859

120/15/1

120/14

0.1655

120/7/2

0.0061-

0:0008

120/7/1

0.1696

120/13

120/8

0.0388

0.0177

421

0.0805

120/12/2

0.0268

कच्चा रास्ता

120/9

0.0783

120/12/1

0.0332

0.0773

120/11

0.1088

120/10

430

0.0252

0.0171

कच्चा रास्ता

121/6

0.1182

121/15

0.0490

121/14

0.0482 241

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

[भाग II-काण्ड| 3 (ii) ]

5 1

126/5

जखाउली

0.1269

सोनीपत सोनीपत

121 /Π

0.1490

सोनीपत सोनीपत जखाठली

0.0269

320

0.0058

121/13

0.1036

126/7

0.2032

121/8

126/4

0.0302

0.1972

121/9

426

0.1164

0.2002

121/10

0.0004

126/3

122/6

0.2179

0.1757

126/8

122/7/1

0.0951

126/9

0.1695

0.0138

122/7/2

126/10

0.2094

0.0424

717(कच्यारास्ता)

0.0476

127/6

0.0122

122/8/2

122/8/1

0.1326

8.4463

कुल

322

0.0486

0.1419

पटला

13/6

0.0526

122/9/1

0.2046

13/7

0.1576

122/9/2

0.1432

13/8/1

122/10

0.2193

13/8/2

0.0537

0.0018

122/1

0.0153

कच्चा रास्ता

123/6

0.0805

13/9

0.1973 123/5

0.0163

0.1117

13/10/1

123/27

0.1893

0.0485

13/10/2

123/7

0.0920

0.0363

56/( पक्का रास्ता) 123/4/2

0.0380

14/6

0.2052

0.1087

123/8

0.2019

14/7

0.0674

123/3

14/8

0.2075

0.0230

310/ रास्ता

14/9

0.1988

0.0995

123/9

0.2081

14/10

123/2

0.1047

0.1967

15/6

0.0745

123/10

15/7

0.1913 123/1

0.1314

15/14

0.0017 124/6

0.0330

15/13

0.0002 124/5

0.1520

0.1235

52 ( कच्चा रास्ता)

0.0192

कच्या प्रस्ता

0.0072

15/13

124/7

0.0009

0.1723

15/8

0.2072

124/4

0.0245

15/12

0.1969

124/3

15/9

0.1638

0.1955

124/2

0.0324

15/11

0.1993

124/1

0.1394

15/10

0.0983

125/5/2

0.0485

16/15

0.1373

125/5/1

0.1337

16/6

125/4

0.1664

0.0030

16/14/1

0.0022

111/24

0.0018

16/14/2

0.2040

125/3

0.1718

16/7

0.0019

111/23

0.2075

16/8

0.1915

125/2

0.0000

16/3

0.2170

125/1

0.1272

16/9

125/10

0.0083

0.0085

16/10

0.0469

126/6

16/2

0.0845 242

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ) 2

5 पटला

सोनीपत सोनीपत

16/1

0.1963

14/2

0.1982

सोनीपत सोनीपत बुध खालसा

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0085

14/1/2

0.0355 17/5

0.2166

टी.पी. -8

चेनेज-8322.90मी. 7/25

0.0051

17/4

0.0957

चेनेज-9417.62 मी. ROU 7/24

0.1086

17/3

0.0019

1.2365

से रास्ते के साथ कुल

7/23

0.2029

बुध मलक

7/22

0.0501

4.6993

कुल

चेनेज-9417.62मी. in से Road चेनेजे 10301.93 मी. ROU सेउली

76/22

0.1387

कुल

76/19

0.0161

जथाडी

76/20

0.1322

76/21

0.0801

0.0006

75/25

चेनेज-10301.93 मी.) रास्ते से के चेनेज-12730.31 मी . साथ 75/16

0.1986

कुल

0.0108

कच्च रास्ता

75/17

0.1868

अकबरपुर

75/14

बरोठा

0.0240

75/18

0,0592

75/13

0.1516

चेनेज-12730.31 मी. ) रास्ते से के चेनेज-14118.68 मी. साथ कुल

75/12

0.2172

75/11

0.1768

जगदीशपुर

75/10

0.0361

74/15

0.0415

74/6

0.1626

0.0155 74/7

0.2144

चेनेज-14118.68 मी. ) रास्ते से के चेनेज-18645.94मी. 46/11 45/15

0.1124 74/8

0.1595

0.1279

कुल

74/3

0.0512

74/9

0.0259

0.0097

पक्का रास्ता

छतेरा बहादुरपुर

74/2

0.1797

3/15

0.0557 74/1

0.1503

0.0062

पक्कारास्ता

0.0845

केनाल

3/14

0.1953

0.0004

कच्या रास्ता

0.1947

3/13

3/12

0.2055 कच्चा रास्ता

0.0023

3/11

0.1684 73/5

0.1631

0.0696

3/20

73/4

0.2045

0.0426

पक्कारास्ता

73/3

0.1910

4/16

0.2120 73/2

0.0128

0.0004

4/25

4/24/2

0.0123

3.0725

कुल

4/24/1

0.0584

0.0144

15/3

बुध खालसा

4/17

0.1396 15/2

0.1888

0.0028

4/18

0.2079

15/1

4/23

0.1805 14/5

0.1945

6/3

0.0757

6/2

0.1556 14/4

0.1963

6/9

0.0827 14/3

0.2009 243

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

5 1

5/22

0.2091

0.1896 सोनीपत सोनीपत अब्बासपुर :

सोनीपत छतेरा बहादुरपुर 6/10

सोनीपत

0.1888

5/21

0.0002

6/11

6/25

0.0623

0.1990

पक्का रास्ता

6/24

0.2012

0.0269

5/6/1

0.2012

6/23

0.0402

5/6/2

0.2012

6/22

0.0694

5/15

0.2012

6/21

0.2012

5/14

0.2080

7/25

0.0967

5/13

0.0242

7/24

2.5542

कुल

15/5

0.0235

0.1537

20/13

लादपुर

0.2285

15/4

0.1996

20/12/2

0.0016

15/7

0.0082

20/19

0.0744

15/3

0.0208

20/20-

0.1696

15/8

0.1726

20/11/2

15/9

0.1114

0.0006

21/16

15/12

0.1388

0.1601

21/15/2

15/11

0.1939

0.1072

0.2018

15/20

21/14/2

14/16

0.1648

0.1391

21/13/2

0.0196

कच्या रास्ता

21/18

0.0301

0.0915

14/25

0.0119

पक्कारास्ता

0.2039

14/24

पक्कारास्ता 0.0336

0.0038

14/23/2

0.0254

21/21

0.0602

25/4

0.1758

21/19

い

0.2146

25/3

21/20/2

0.1820

0.0185

25/2/2

0.1202

22/16/2

0.0264

25/8

0.0120

22/16/2

0.1391

25/9/1

0.0175

22/25

25/9/2

0.0993

0.0150

0.0250

25/10

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0316

0.0191

25/12/1

0.0190

कच्चा रास्ता

0.2184

25/11

0.0798

पक्कारास्ता

26/15

0.0586

0,0036

0.0588

25/20/1

22/17/1

0.2000

26/16

0.0861

22/24/1

0.0796

26/17/1

0.1940

22/23

0.0105

26/17/2

0.0063

22/18/2

0.0000

26/25

0.0009

22/18/1

26/24/1

0.1316

0.1980

0.0218

26/24/2

0.0584

22/21

0.1354

26/23

पक्का रास्ता

0.0083

0.1320

2.4808

कुल

0.1404

33/2

0.0014

4/22

0.1227 अब्बासपुर

33/9

0.1338

4/21

0.1792

33/10

0.0788

33/11

0.0358

पक्कारास्ता

32/6

0.0004

0.1922

5/25

0.1127

32/15/2

5/24

0.1998

0.0956

32/15/1

0,1863

5/23 244

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

2 1

32/14

0.0060

सोनीपत सोनीपत

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( 11 )] 3

सोनीपत सोनीपत

अब्बासपुर

32/16

0.0494

32/17

0.2160

0.0126

32/18

0.0136

32/23

32/24

0.2013

43/4

0.0531

0.2816

राष्ट्रीय भोरीमार्ग

43/6

0.0585

43/15/1

0.0707

43/15/2

0.0873

42/11

0.0564

42/20

0.1936

43/7

0.0175

43/16

0.0062

42/21

0.1270

42/22/1

0.0704

0.0014

कच्या रास्ता

0.0108

47/1

0.0016

47/2

0.2168

47/9

0.1172

47/8

0.1066

47/13

0.2190

47/14

0.0003

47/18/1

0.0240

0.0153

47/18/2

47/18/3

0.0758

47/17

0.0797

47/24/2

0.0155

47/24/1

0.0306

47/23

0.0066

0.3490

0.0306

51/7/1

0.0551

51/7/2

0.1800

51/4/2

51/5/2

0.1800

51/6

0.0951

0.0034

51/14

51/15

0.1681

0.0173

51/16

9.7008

कुल

2/16

नहरा

0.1526

0.1772

2/25

कच्चा रास्ता

0.0132

0.0690

5/5/3

नहरा

5/5/1

0.0546

5/5/4

0.0280

5/5/2

0.0235

5/6

0.1718

0.1735

5/15

5/16

0.1846

0.1878

5/25

0.0117

0.0125

8/5/2

8/5/1

0.1560

0.0146

कच्या रास्ता

8/6

0.1558

8/7

0.0054

0.0139 8/15/1

8/14/1

0.0011

8/15/2

0.1489

0.0217

8/14/2

8/16

0.1427

8/17

0.0416

0.1250

8/25

8/24

0.0551

12/5

0.1138

12/4

0.0657

12/6

0.0950

12/7

0.0812

12/15/1

0.0294

12/15/2

0.0393

0.1000

12/14/1

12/14/2

0,0101

0.0473

12/16/2

12/17

0.1348

12/25

0.0185

12/25

0.0135

0.1271

12/24/2

0.0081

0.0203

0.0300

18/5

0.0142

18/4/1

0.1302

18/4/2

0.0165

18/6

18/7

0,1606

18/15

0.0010

18/14

0.2088

0,1642

18/7/1

18/7/2

0.0039

18/24

0,1564 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौत्र 29 , 1929

2 1

1 नहरा

30/4

245

74/22/2

सोनीपत सोनीपत

0.1833

30/7

0,1863

30/14

0.1647

30/17

0.1757

30/16

0.0054

30/25

0.0628

30/24

0.0801

नहरी बि शाखा 0.1081

40/5

0.1210

40/4

0.0130

0.1585

40/6.

40/15

0.1528

0.0521

41/11

0.0434

41/20/1

0.0236

40/16

0,0699

पक्का रास्ता

41/20/2

0.0721

41/21

0.1864

0.1834

50/1

0.1827

50/10

0.1625

50/11

0.0382

50/12

0.0837

50/19

50/20

0.0790

0.1266

50/22

0.0357

50/21

65/2

0.1636

0.0033

65/1

65/9

0,1914

65/12

0.1783

0.0751

65/19/1

65/19/2

0.1173

65/22/2

0.1365

65/22/1

0.0381

0.1677

74/2

74/3

0.0291

0.0962

74/8

74/9

0.1074

74/13/1

0.1249

0.0410

74/12

0.0045

74/13/2

0.17-18

74/18

74/19

0.0030

0.0599

74/23/1

0.0004

74/22/1

(पक्का

0.0663

रास्ता) 120

0.0473

74/23/2

नहरा

0.0061

86/3

0.1753

0.1733

86/8

0,1895

86/13

0.0207

86/26

0.1778

86/18

0.1702

86/23/1

86/23/2

0.0014

0.1927

94/4/3

94/8/1

0.0910

94/8/2

0.0925

0.1718

94/13

0,0061

94/14/1

94/17/2

0.0390

0.1394

94/18

0.0703

94/24/1

94/23

0.1138

0.0277

97/4

97/3

0.0345

10.3989

कुल

0.0373

30/4

हालापुर

0.0777

30/3

0,0568

30/7

0.1135

30/8

0.0271

30/14

30/13

0.1542

30/17

0.0303

30/18

0.1537

30/24

0.0505

30/23

0.1342

0.0600

35/4

0.1231

35/3

35/7

0,0560

0.1227

35/8.

35/14

0,0562

0.1336

35/13

0.0517

35/17/2

35/18

0.1188

0.0486

35/24/1

0.1298

35/23

0.0381

57/4/1

57/3

0.1283

0.0038

57/4/2

57/7

0.0502

0.1451

57/8

57/14

0.1752

0.0024

57/13

57/17/2

0.0448 246

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

57/18

सोनीपत । सोनीपत

0.1189

हालापुर

यस्ता

0.0172

57/24

0.0498

57/23/1

0.0306

0.0437

57/23/2

57/23/3

0.0188

57/23/4

0.0143

57/23/5

0.0161

60/3/1

0.0125

60/3/2

0.0136

60/3/3

0.1121

60/4

0.0493

60/8

0,1399

60/7

0.0372

60/14

0.0199

60/13

0.0694

केमाल

0.0030

113

0.5824

81/3/1

0.0291

81/3/2

0.0150

81/4

0.0023

81/7

0.0153

81/8/1

0.0608

81/8/2

0.0728

0.0473

81/8/3

81/14/1

0,0104

81/14/2

0.0098

81/13/1

0.0815

81/13/2

0.0633

81/17/2

0.0302

81/18

0.1517

0.0374

81/24/1

81/23

0.1398

84/4/1

0.0460

0.1344

84/3

84/7

0.0518

0.1215

84/8

84/14

0.0677

84/13

0.1273

84/18

0.0563

84/17

0.0074

5.1137

कुल

नहरी

97/17

0.0512

97/18

0.0517

97/24/1

0.0331

97/24/2

0.0229

97/23

0.1409

98/4/1

0.0038

98/4/2

0.0118

0.0359

98/3

0.3513

कुल

[PART II-SBC. 3 ( ii ) ] 2

सोनीपत खरखोदा जींजाउली 11/4

0.0790

0.0321

11/3

11/8/1

0.0228

11/7/1

0.0692

0.0759

74(बोनाल)

11/7/3

0.0752

11/8/2

0.0049

0.0025

11/13

0.1129

11/17

0.1729

0.0036

11/24/1

0.1774

11/23

0.0063

28/4

0.1817

28/3

0.0014

28/7/1

0.1319

28/7/2

0.0545

28/14

0.1745

28/17/1

0.0516

28/17/2

0.1283

28/24

0.1793

33/4/1

0.1290

33/4/2

0.0395

0.0176

33/4/3

33/7

0.1776

0.0277

33/14/1

33/14/2

0.1502

33/17

0.1754

33/24

0.1860

49/4

0.1902

49/7

0.1701

49/14

0.1845

49/17

0.1883

49/24

0,1732

52/4

0.1614

52/7

0.1863

52/14

0.1332

52/17

0.0758

52/24

0.0404

64/4

0.0060

वेर्स्टन यमुना केनाल 0.3011

4.4513

कुल

[फाईल सं. एल-14014/ 28 /07-जीपी ]

एस. बी. मंडल , अवर सचिव भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

[ भाग II--खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1 NewDelhi , the 15th January, 2008

247

0.1550

Sonipat Sonipat

S.O. 107. Whereas it appears to the Government of India that it is necessary in public interest that for trans- portation of natural gas through Dadri - Bawana -Nangal pipeline project in the state of Haryana, a pipeline should be laidby GAIL(India) Limited;

And, whereas it appears to the Government of "India that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification.

Now, therefore , in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition ofRight ofUser in Land) Act, 1962, (50 of 1962) the Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein .

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date ofwhich the copies of the notification issued under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writingto the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri K.L. Bisnoi , Competent Authority, GAIL (India) Limited, GTI, PARC Building, Plot No. 24, Sector- 16A, Noida, Distt.Gautam Budh Nagar- 201301 (U.P. )

SCHEDULE

District Tehsil Village

Area to be

Survey No. acquired

forROU

(inHectares) 1

0.0965

42/7

Sonipat Sonipat Khurrampur

0.0589

41/4

42/8

0.0052

0.1840

41/3

CartTrack 0.0240

41/2

0.0116

CartTrack 0.0128

0.0100

41/2

0.0132

23/23

0.0020

CartTrack

23/22

0.2053

23/21

0.0109

0.0371

23/19

23/20

0.2129

24/16

0.0118

23/11

0.0371

0.2157

24/15

24/6

0.1080 62G1/08-12

Khurrampur 24/7

24/4

0.0501

0.0084

CartTrack

24/3

0.2112

24/2

'0,0120

0,0455

19/23

19/22

0.2146

19/21

0.0928

19/19

0.0003

0.1329

19/20

18/16

0.1946

0.0201

18/17

0.0326

18/15

18/14

02129

0.1156

18/13

18/8

0.0981

0.2422

18/9

0,0253

18/10

0.0250

18/2

0.1900

18/1

0.0646

17/5

9/21

0.0039

0.1735

10/25

0.1107

10/24

0.1030

10/17

0.2252

10/18

0.0237

10/13

10/19 :

0.0257

0.0336

10/12

4.0999

TOTAL

0.0016

129/13

Manoli

129/12

0.1867

129/11

0.1044

129/10

0.1260

0.0629

130/6/1

0.1404

130/6/2

0.0279

130/5

0.0266

130/7

0.1645

130/4

0.0461

Murram

Road

0.1472

130/3

0.0725

-120/23

0.0094

CartTrack

0.0018

130/2

0.1741

120/22

0.0122

CartTrack 248

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008 /PAUSA 29, 1929

[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii)] 2

5 120/19/1

69/8

0.0771

0.1799 Sonipat Sonipat

Sonipat Sonipat

0.0158

0.0002 120/19/2

69/9

Manoli (Contd.)

120/20

0.1562

0.0835

69/3

0.1784 120/11

0.1766

69/2

0.0728

53/22

0.1159 119/15

120/10

0.0011

0.1365

$3/21

119/6

0.2194

53/20/2

0.1118 119/7

0.0194

0.0159

52/16/2

119/5

0.0162

0.0280

Cart Track

119/4

0.0202

0.2214

53/20/1

52/16/1

0.0494 119/3

0.0085

0.0008 101/24

0.0176

52/15

101/23/2

0.1533

Asphalt

Road

0.0263

0.0477

101/23/1

0.1931

52/15

BrickRoad 0.0230

0.0203

52/16/1

0.0629

101/18

0.0505

52/14

0.1832

101/19

0.0063

52/6/3

101/12

0,1264

0.0679

52/7/2

101/11

0.1019

52/7/3

0.0563

0.2279

101/10-

0.0706

52/7/1

0.0229

102/6

0.0008

52/8/2

0.0256

101/1

0.0497

$2/8/ 1

102/5

0.1854

52/4

0.0058 85/25

0.1324

0.2350

52/3

85/24

0.0929

40/23

0.0230

0.0571

85/17/1

0.0220

52/2

85/17/2

0.1499

0.2290

40/22

0.0193

85/18

0.0368

40/19

85/14

0.0311

40/21

0.0118 85/13/2

0.1359

0.2181

40/20

85/13/1

0.0610

40/16

0.0074 85/8/1

0.0037

0.0452

40/11

85/8/2

0.0884

0.2048

41/15

85/9

0.1320

0.0744

41/6

85/2

0.1861

0.0130

Cart Track

85/1

0.0553

0.0000

41/14

68/22

0.0041

41/7

0.1894 68/21

0.2288

0.0988

41/4

69/25

0.0193

0.1552

41/3

68/20

0.0269

0.1217

29/23

69/16

0.2372

0.1162

29/22

69/17/1

0.0107

0.1754

29/19

0.0402

68/15

0.0922

29/20

0.2122

69/14

29/12

0.0000

0.0024

69/13

29/11

0.2003 69/7

0.0618

28/15

0.0677 249

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19, 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड ३ (ii) ]

0.0153

0,0023

83-Cart Track 29/10

Sonipat Sonipat

0.0394 28/6/1

16/20

0.0373

Pabsara (Contd.)

Manoli (Contd.)

0.1946

16/11

28/6/2

0.1582

0.1427

17/15

0.0031

28/5

0.0839

17/6

0.0570

28/7

0.0010

0.2125

17/14

28/4

0.2284

177

0.0278

28/3

0.0064

17/4

0.0167

22/24

0.0583

0.2322

17/8

22/23

0.0289

0.1747

17/3

0.0325

0,1713 Brick Road

17/2

0.0584

0.0066

22/18

12/22

0.0072

17/1

0.1878

22/19

0.2181

0.0051

12/21

22/20

22/12

0.0516

0.0031

80-Cart Track

0.2049

22/11

0.0010

12/20

0.0836

22/10

0.0543

11/25/2

0.0004

23/15

0.0232

79-Cart Track

0.0138

0.1809

23/6

11/25/1

0.1426

0.0922

11/16

23/5

23/4

0.1639

0.1976

11/17

10/24

0.0233

11/14

0.0312

0.0017

Cart Track

0.0216

11/18

0.0078

CartTrack

0.2124

11/13

0.0975

10/24

0.1232

11/12

0.0005

23/4

0.1054

11/9

0.1365

10/23

0.0000

0.0784

10/18

0.2237

11/10

0.0138

11.3916

TOTAL

10/6

0.0426

0.0553

26/18

Sonipat Sonipat Pabsara

10/5

0.1763

0.1063

26/19

0.1287

10/4

0.1712

26/12

0.1174

8/24/2

26/11

0.0619

0.0494

CartTrack

0.0028

26/9

0.0818

8/23/1

0.2095

26/10

0.0062

8/24/1

0.0422

25/6

8/18

0.0876

0.0084

26/1

0.2310

25/5

TOTAL

4.8352

0.0511

16/25

0.1073

64/18

Sonipat Sonipat Jakhauli

0.0042

25/4

0.0307

64/19

0.1966

16/24

0.0163

64/13

0.1082

16/23

0.2113

64/12

0.1113

16/18

0.0205

64/9

0.2029

16/19

312

0.0217

0.0089

84-Cart Track

64/11

0.0148

0.0069

16/12

0.2190

64/10 250

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

[PART II-SBC. 3 ( ii) ] 1

64/1

0.0619

0.2235

28/3

Sonipat Sonipat Jakhauli

63/6

0.0000

0.0051

28/2

(Contd.)

63/5

0.1622

0.0360

21/23/3

48/25

0.1343

0.0156

21/23/2

48/24

0.1352

0.1898

21/22

48/17

0.1409

0.0895

21/19/2

371

0.0108

0.0208

21/19/1

0.0998

48/18

0.1076

21/20

48/13

0.1932

21/11

0.1989

0.0645 48/12

0.0532

20/15

0.0057

0.0025 48/8

21/10

0.2170

0.2094 48/9

20/6

0.0167

0.0244

20/7

48/10

370

0.0305

0.0123

20/5/2

0.2063 48/2

0.0146

20/4

0.0925 48/1

0.2182

9/24

0.1457 49/5

9/23

0.0046

0.1698

9/18

0.0421

43/21

9/19

0.0672

0.0967

42/25/2

0.0020

9/13

42/25/1

0.1233

0.2100

9/12

0.0010

42/24

0.0313

9/11

42/16

0.0707

0.0157

9/9

42/17

0.1728

0.2350

9/10

0.0215

371/2

0.0224

9/1

42/14

1051

0.0141

345-Cart Track 42/13

0.0939

0.0132

10/6

0.0496

42/8/1

0.1660

10/5

42/8/2

0.1402

358-Cart Track 0.0121 42/9

0.0810

3/25

0.1156 42/3

0.0002

0.0977

: 3/24

0.1986

42/2

0.0305

3/26

42/1

0.0202

0.1770

3/17

0.0148

371/1

0.0368

3/18

0.0177

27/22

0.0149

3/14

27/21

0.2104

0.2096

3/13

0.0794

27/20

0.0136

3/12

0.0002

28/25

0.0518

3/8

28/16

0.1583

0.1850

3/9

0.1181

28/15/2

0.0711

3/2

0.0235

28/15/1

7.9379

TOTAL

0.1008

28/14

0.0006

0.0389 28/8/2

186/1

Sonipat Sonipat Khewara

0.1946

0.0616 28/7

186/2

0.0084 28/4/2

0.0011

155/22

0.0610

155/22

0.0353

Asphalt Road

0.0092

28/8/1

304(Asphalted

0.1205 28/4/1

0.0099

Road) 251 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29, 1929

0.1701

155/19

81/23/1

0.0890 Sonipat Sonipat Khewara

Sonipat Sonipat Khewara

155/20

0.0136

81/18

0.1837 155/12

0.1111

81/13

0.1638

0.0726

155/11

81/12

0.0198

0.1352

81/8

155/10

0.1030

0.0485

155/9

81/9/1

0.0300

0.0580

155/1

81/9/2

0.0510

0.0949

81/2

0.1436

155/1

0.0285

CartTrack

81/3/3

0.0134 155/2

0.0024

81/3/2

0.0223

0.1837

152/21

81/3/1

0.0042

0.1837

152/20/2

53/23/2

0.0006

152/11

0.1825

53/22

0.1841

0.0012

151/15

53/19

0.1832 151/6

0.0435

53/12

0.1774

152/10

53/9

0.1402

0.0426 152/1

0.0778

8/16

0.0053

0.1060

0.2096

8/15

151/5

0.1665

122/25

8/14

0.0001

0.0171

121/21

8/6/1

0.0090

0.0594

122/16/2

8/6/2

0.0744 122/16/1

8/7/1

0.1243

0.1203

0.1837

0.0615

8/7/2

122/15

122/6

8/4

0.1837

0.0934 122/5

0.1672

8/3/3

0.0411 122/4

0.0166

8/3/2

0.0411

0.0770

117/24

8/3/1

0.0896

0.1072

6/23

117/25

0.1036

0.1392

117/17

Cart Track 0.0205

6/22/2

117/16/2

0.0440

0.1200

6/22/1

117/15

0.0014

0.0210

0.1823

117/14

6/19

0.1138

0.1837

1177

0.1514

6/201

0.1837

117/4

6/11

0.0986

0.1817

88/24

5/15

0.0105

0.0020

88/23

TOTAL

7.5905

0.0476

88/18

72/9

0.1045

Jajjal

0.1361

88/17

72/10

0.0595

0.1102

88/13

72/2

0.0066

0.0735

88/14

72/1

0.0487

0.1695

TOTAL

0.2194

0.0142

88/7

33/10/2

0.0002

Parli Kalan

0.0546

88/3/1

33/1

0.1523 512(Cart Track) 0.0518

29/21

0.1568

0.0773

88/3/2

30/25/2

0.0494 81/23/2

0.0947

29/20/2

0.0111 -252

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] 1

0.0855

56/4

30/16/1

0.1372 Sonipat Sonipat Parli Kalan

Sonipat Sonipat Dipalpur

30/16/2

56/3

0.1135

0.1183 30/15/1

0.1590

CartTrack 0.0122

0.0502

30/14

39/23

0.1449 30/6

39/22

0.0101

0.0914 30/7

0.1986

0.0380

Asphalt Road

-0.1532

30/4

0.1347

39/19

0.0523

30/3

CartTrack 0.0111 26/24

0.0093

39/20

0.1005 26/23/2

0.1824

39/11

0.1748

0.0099

26/23/1

40/15

0.0809 26/18/2

0.0527

40/6

0.1838 26/18/1

0.0930

40/7

0.0546 26/19

0.0620

40/5

0.0065 26/13

40/4

0.2212

0.0063

0.2080

26/12

35/24

0.1219

0.1444

26/9

0.0119

CartTrack

0.0568

26/10

35/17

0.0008

0.0086

26/2

0.0777

35/23

0.1797

26/1

35/18

0.2081

0.0005

35/13

0.1045

0.0885

SH- 11

35/12

0.1056 25/5/1

35/9

0.0011

0.2089

35/2

0.0034

22/21/1

0.0815

0.2006

23/25

35/10

0.0012

0.1239

22/16

35/1

0.1287 23/17

0.0174

0.0868

CartTrack

0.0010

23/15/2

21/21

0.1874

0.1938

23/14

22/25

0.0054

0.1153

0.0612 23/7

21/20

0.1422

22/16

0.1099

23/8

0.1977

0.0016

22/15/2

23/3

0.0014

23/2

CartTrack 0.0309

0.0087

CTR

22/15/1

0.1728

22/14

0.0582

10/23

0.0079

22/6

0.0566

0.2028

10/22

22/7

0:1497

0.0610

10/19

0.2002

0.0092

CTR

22/4

0.0019

0.0061 10/21

22/3

16/14

0.0620

0.1228

10/20

16/23

0.1410

0.1443 10/11

0.2018

16/18

3.9348

TOTAL

16/19

0.0045

0.0253

57/11

Sonipat Sonipat Dipalpur

16/13

0.0676

0.1307

56/15

16/12

0.1387

0.1341

56/6

16/9

0.2031

0.1381

56/7 253

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

0.1064

0.0031

27/4/2

16/10

Sonipat Sonipat Makimpur

Sonipat Sonipat Dipalpur

27/4/1

0.0872 16/2

0.0735

24/24/2

0.0001 16/1

0.1328

0.1976

CartTrack*

11/21

0.0080

0.0421

CartTrack

24/24/1

0.1578,

0.0020

0.0234 12/25

24/23

0.0066 11/20

CartTrack

0.0549

24/17

0.0660

0.0132

12/16/3

0.1216

24/18/1

12/16/2

0.0686

12/16/1

0.0007

0.0341

24/18/2

0.0014 12/15

24/14

0.2051

0.1910

24/13

12/14

0.0011

12/6

24/8

0.1816

0.0860

0.0020

0.0466

24/9

12/7/2

0.1228

0.0737

24/3

12/7/1

24/2

0.0670 12/4/2

0.1304

0.0259

0.0753

13/23

12/4/1

0.1679 12/3

13/22

0.0005

0.1792 6/24

0.0926

13/19

0.0082 6/23

CartTrack

0.1137

0.2027

0.1343

13/12/2

6/18

0.0427

13/12/1

6/13

0.0715

0.0313

13/11

CartTrack

0.0196

0.0449 6/19

0.0001

13/9/2

0.0073 6/12

13/9/1

0.1069

0.1440

13/10

0.1380

6/9/1

6/9/2

0.0172

0.0684

13/1/2

0.0000

0.1871

13/1/1

6/10

6/2/2

14/5

0.0960

0.0071

0.0593 6/2/1

0.0104

11/21 :

0.1184 6/1

10/25/2

0.0999

0.0001

4/22

10/25/1

0.0259

0.1322

10/16

0.1704

4/21

0.0286

0.0051

CartTrack

Asphalted

Road

4/20

0.0146

0.0592

10/17

7.3133

TOTAL

0.0510

10/15/1

0.0168

27/25

Makimpur

10/14

0.1558 26/20

0.1178

10/7

0.1700 27/16

0,0605

10/4

0.0231 26/11

0.0051

CartTrack 0.0304 CartTrack 0.0093

10/8/1

0.0159

0.1389

27/15/2

0.1300

10/3/2

0.0624

27/15/1

10/3/1

0.0373

0.1361

27/6

2/23/2

0.1228

0.0674

27/7

0.0629

2/23/1

27/5

0.0049 254

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008 /PAUSA 29, 1929

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1

0.0128

60/8

0.0695 Sonipat Sonipat Makimpur

Sonipat Sonipat Asadpur

2/18

0.0528

60/4

0.0029 2/19

0.1226

0.2031

60/3

61/23

0.1444 TOTAL

4.1590

61/22

0.0698 89/19

0.0511

Nandnaur

61/18

0.0032 89/12

0.1742

61/19

0.2020 89/11

0.0167

61/12

0.1409 89/9

0.0376

0.0776

61/11

89/10

0.1883

61/9

0.0016 89/1

0.1890

61/10

0.0271 88/5

0.0140

1.1761

TOTAL

79/21

0.0359

0.0074

Cart Track

225/11

0.0024

Morthal Khas

80/25

0.1557

225/10

0.1628 CartTrack 0.0106

0.1319

225/1

80/16

0.1888

224/5

0.0492 80/17

0.0161

0.0038

188/21

80/15

0.0394

CartTrack 0.0344

0.1509

189/25/1

0.1512 80/14

80/7

0.1838

189/25/2

0.0347

0.0125

80/8

189/25/3

0.0140 80/4

189/16

0.0419

0.1301

0.1836

80/3

0.0557

189/17

63/23

0.0194

CartTrack 0.0257

189/15

0.0044

0.0164

(Cart Track) 993

63/23

0.1617

189/14

0.1950 63/22

0.0261

189/7

0.0980 63/18

0.0252

Cart Track 0.0144 63/19

0.1837

CartTrack 0.0103

0.1748

63/12

189/8

0.0707 63/11

0.0285

CartTrack 0.0211 63/9

0.0242

189/4

0.0003 63/10

0.2091

189/3

0.1901

0.1586

184/23

63/1

0.1138 62/5

0.0349

0.0944

184/22

0.0104

184/18

0.0005 Cart Track

56/21

0.0137

184/19

0.2061 57/25

0.1924

184/12

0.1091 57/16

0.1722

0.0038

184/20

57/17

0.0429

0.1016

184/11/1

57/15

0.0131

184/11/2 0.0038 57/14

0.0984

Cart Track 0.0264 TOTAL

3.2842

184/10

0,1785

0.0946

0.0096

184/1

CartTrack

Asadpur

60/14

0.0726

183/6

0.0002 60/7

0.1517

183/5

0.1161 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( 11) ]

1 1

2 2

0.1817

Sonipat Sonipat Morthal Khas 146/25

Sonipat Sonipat Morthal Khas

0.0274

CartTrack

0.0890

146/16

0.0009

146/24

146/17

0.1202

Asphalted

Road

0.0418

146/14

0.1798

146/13

0.0069

146/7

0.0589

146/8

0.0913

0.0248

CartTrack

0.2180

146/3

146/2

0.0266

137/23

0.0194

0.2223

137/22

137/19

0.0659

0.0024

137/21

137/20

0.1305

137/11

0.2022

136/15

0.0559

137/10

0.0072

136/6

0.1785

136/5

0.1163

136/4

0.1408

106/24

0.1605

106/23/2 0.0163

106/23/1

0.0475

106/17

0.0019

106/18/1

0.1206

106/18/2

0.0410

106/19

0.0011

0.0283

CartTrack

106/13

0.0421

106/12

0.1368

CartTrack 0.0321

106/9

0.0700

0.0020

106/11

106/10

0.1040

Asphalted

Road

0.0428

106/1

0.1314

107/5

0.0961

CartTrack 0.0317

102/25

0.1458

102/24

0.1269

62G1 /08-13

255

0.1485 102/17

102/18

0.1173

0.1643 102/13

102/12

0.1039

0.1671 102/9

0.0003 102/2

102/10

0.0869

0.1816 102/1

0.0856 101/5

79/25

0.1685 Cart Track(353 ) 0.0219

0.0028 79/24/2

0.0718 79/24/1

0.0007 79/16

0.0133 79/17/1

0.0466 79/17/2

0.1477 79/17/3

79/18

0.0411

0,0325 CartTrack

0.0088 79/14/1

79/13

0.1261

0.0614 347 (Asphalt Road)

0.0640 79/12

0.0023 79/8

0.0390 79/9/2

0.1758 79/9/1

0.0040 79/2

0.0536 79/10/1

0.0021 79/10/2

0.1969 79/1

80/5

0.0333

0,0065 74/21

0.1599 73/25

0.0248 CartTrack

0.1811 73/24

0.0501 73/23

0.0514 CartTrack

0.0138 73/17

0.1240 73/18

0.1928 73/19

0.0267 73/12

0.0140 73/11/1

0,0793 73/11/2

0.2032 72/15

72/14

0.0443 256

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] 1

0.0406

0.0005 Sonipat Sonipat Morthal Khas 72/6

Sonipat Sonipat

Hassanpur 36/21/1

727

0.1397

36/20/2

0.0190 CartTrack 0.0522

36/20/1

0.1714 72/4

0.0042

0.0506

36/11

72/8/2

0.0633

0.0065

CartTrack

72/8/1

0.0177

0.0001

37/16

72/3

0.1401

37/15

0.2035 72/2

0.2198

0.0507

37/6/3

72/1

0.1388

37/14

0.0053 62/21

0.0795

0.2306

37/7

71/5

0.0035

0.0021

37/8/2

63/25

0.2311

0.0280

37/8/1

63/16

0.0036

37/4

0.0141

0.0273

Asphalted

37/3

0.2221 Road

0.0538

37/2

63/24

0.0358

0.0200

CartTrack

845 (Cart Track) 0.0152

0.0202

CartTrack

63/17

0.1506

34/23

0.0000

0.2093

63/18

34/22

0.1564 63/19/1

0.0533

0.1260

34/21

0.0029

63/18/2

0.1147

34/20

63/12

0.1503

0.0151

CartTrack

845(Cart Track

) 0.0131 .

0.0151

CartTrack

63/19/2

0.0162

0.1529

33/16

0.0271

63/11/3

0.0135

0,0469

63/11/2

CartTrack

0.1117

0.0015 63/11/1

CartTrack

63/10

0.0584

0.0704

33/15

00010

64/15

0.0035

0.2048

33/14

64/6

0.2311

0.0003

33/17

100

647/2

0:0016

0.0463

33/7

64/7/1

0.0039

0.0053

CartTrack

64/4/2

0.0823

0.0027

33/13

0.0216

64/5/2

0.2136

33/8

0.0275

CartTrack

0.0587

10000

64/4/1

0.1385

0.0038

33/9

CartTrack 0.0283

33/2

0.2160 64/4/3

0:0348

0.0241

33/1

64/3

0.0494

0.0098

Field Channel CartTrack 0.0276

0.0160

24/22

0.0013

48/24

0.0653

24/21/2

0.1567

48/23

0.0238

Asphalted

48/22

0.0398

24/21/1

0.1324

Road

TOTAL 12.4980

0.0613

25/25

0.0031 36/22

0.1644

24/20/2

Sonipat Hassanpur

36/19

0,0812

25/16

0.1880 257 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (i ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

5 1

0.1526

0.0705

64/17/1

Sonipat Sonipat-Hassanpur 25/17

25/14

0.0767

64/14/2

0.0035 (Contd.)

Sonipat Gannaur-Bhagan (Contd.)

0.0041

0.1374

64/17/2

25/18

0.2144 25/13/2

64/18

0.1332

0.1641 25/13/1

0.0804

64/19

0.0472 25/12

64/22/1

0.1345

0.2064 25/9

0.0925

64/20

0.0018

0.0042. 25/11

64/21

0.0304

0.1935

25/10/2

65/16/2

0.0043 25/10/1

65/16/1

0.0267

0.0000

0.1868 25/1

NH-1 (G.T.

ROAD)

0.0235

Asphalted

0.1992

65/24

Road

65/23/2

0.0983 26/6/2

0.0011

0,1003

65/23/1

26/6/1

0.0893

0.0000

0.1984 26/7

65/22

0.0101 26/5/2

CartTrack

0.1075

0.0048

0.1916 26/5/1

65/21

26/4

66/25

0.2111

0.2255

0.0101

CartTrack

0.0247

26/3/2

66/24

26/3/1

0.1882

0.0718

0.0011

0.1980

66/23

19/24/1

0.1960

0.1229

19/23

66/22

0.2101

66/21

0.2198

19/22

0.0025

67/25

19/19

0.1887

67/24

0.2089 19/21

0.0832

0.0180 19/20

0.1422

Metal Road

0.1780

67/23

0.0066

CartTrack

0.2040

67/22

0.2083

18/16

67/21

0.1919

0.0097

18/15

0.0028

67/20

0.0584

18/17

0.1847

68/25

0.1639

18/14

0.0204

68/16

0.1097

18/13/2

fans

68/24

0.1603

0.1028

18/13/1

0.0199

68/17

0.0111

18/8

0.0497

CartTrack

0.0067

Field Channel

0.0039

68/18

0.0509

18/12

0.1648 18/9

68/23

0.1172

0.1458

68/22

18/10

0.1530

0.0584

0.0357

68/19

68/21/1

0.1145

0.0302

Lined Canal

0.0637.

68/20

6.3651

TOTAL

0.0352

CartTrack

0.0549

Cart Track- 100

Gannaur Bhagan

0.1192

69/25

0.0867

64/15/2

0.0740

69/16/2

0.0925

64/16/1

0,1162

69/24

0.0173

64/16/2 258

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008 /PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SBC. 3 ( 11 ) ] 1

5 69/17/3

0.0779

49/23

0.0349 Sonipat Gannaur-Bhagan

Sanipat Gannaur

69/23

0.1202

49/18

0.1764 (Contd.)

Bhagan (Contd.)

69/18

0.0812

49/19

0.1996 69/22

0.0319

49/26

0.0110 69/19

0.2234

49/12

0.0005 69/20

0.0476

49/20

0.1215 69/12

0.0070

49/11/2

0.0825 69/11

0.2012

Cart Track 0.0105 70/15

0.0744

50/16/1

0.0062

0.0010

69/10

50/15

0.2065 70/6

0.1856

50/14

0.1974 70/7/1

0.0992

50/13

0.0702 70/7/2

0.0010

50/7

0.0144 70/4

0.1652

50/8

0.1338 55/24

0.0000

50/12

0.0000 70/3/3

0.0854

50/9

0.1091 55/23

0.1736

TOTAL 10.4985 55/22

0.1344

61/9

0.1055

Rajpur

55/19

0.1238

0.1620

61/10

55/20/1

0.0363

61/1/2

0.0059 Asphalted 0.0367

61/1/1

0.0482 Road-110

62/6/1

0.0242 55/20/2

0.1002

0.1867

62/5/2

55/11

0.0793

62/4

0.2081

0.0001

54/16

62/3/2

0.0629 54/15

0.2025

62/3/1

0.0410 54/6

0.0900

59/24

0.0024 54/7/1

0.0199

62/2

0.0068 54/7/2

0.1668

59/23

0,1052 54/4/1

0.0456

59/22

0.2176 54/8

0,0099

59/21

0.1474 54/3/2

0.0629

58/25

0.0092

0.0165

CartTrack

0.0696

59/20

54/3/1

0.1125

58/16

0.1878 54/26

0.0036

J. R. Distri- 54/2

0.2079

0.0639

butary

48/22/2

0.0080

58/17

0.1297 54/1

0.0823

0.0434

58/14

48/21

0.1322

58/18

0.0506 53/5

0.0000

58/13

0.1499 49/25

0.1992

58/19

0.0062 CartTrack 0.0107

58/12

0.1960 49/24/2

0.1606

0.1982

58/11

49/17/1

0.0128

CartTrack 0.0112 49/17/2

0.0280

0.1177

57/15/1

49/24/1

0.0110

57/15/2

0.0751 259

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

0.0439

33/11

0.0361

57/14/2

0.0197

33/10/1

0.1657

57/14/1

Sonipat Gannaur-Raj pur (Contd.)

Sonipat Gannaur-Rajpur (Contd.)

33/10/2

0.0513

0.2074

57/13

33/10/8

0.1256 57/12

0.1588

32/6/1

0.1134

0.0106

57/9

32/6/2

0.1625

0.0027 57/11

32/5

0.1287

0.0638

57/10

33/1

0.0004

0.1003

56/15

0.2321

32/4

0.0135

56/14

0.0373.

32/3

56/6

0.1075

0.0519

0.2070

56/7

CartTrack

30/24

0.0017

0.0398

56/8

30/23

0.0757

0.0174

56/3

30/22

0.0104

0.0445

Asphalted

Road

TOTAL

7.1213

0.0020

46/21

8/7

0.0030

Bhuri

0.1417

47/25

8/8/1

0.0212 47/16

0.0222

8/8/2

0.0715

0.0201

47/24

8/3

0.0755 47/17

0.1135

0.0007

8/9

0.0140

47/18

8/2/1

0.2091 Asphalted

0.0141

8/2/2

0.0611

Road

8/1

0.0612

0.1284

48/5

0.0048

6/22/2

0.0267

48/4

0.0021

6/21/1

34/25

0.0051

0.1119

6/21/2

Asphalted

0.0031

6/20

0.0430

Road

0.0294

0.1480

34/24

0.1909

34/23

0.6075

TOTAL

34/18

0.0306

0.0407

57/17/2

Rajlu

0.0018

WB(Field

0.0394

57/17/1

Channel)

0.0775

57/18

0.0995

34/22

0.0000

57/14

0.0963

34/19

57/13

0.1211

0.0620

34/21

57/12

0.1751

0.0749

34/20

0.0864

57/9

0.1590

B.G.Rail-

0.0002

57/11/1

Way

57/10/4

0.0102

0.1084

33/16/2

0.0050

/ 33/16/1

0.0213

0.0501

57/10/3

33/17

0.2046

0.0736

57/10/2

0.1884

33/18

0.0552

57/10/1

33/13

0.0511

0.0541

57/1

0.0077

33/19/1

58/6

0.0059 33/12

0.2272

0.1204

58/5

33/9/2

0.0099

50/23

0.0779 260

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 1

5 50/18

0.0026

Sonipat Gannaur Rajul

0.1296

Sonipat Gannaur Panchi Jatan 40/8

50/22

0.0391

40/9/1

0.1265 (Contd.)

(Contd.)

50/19/2

0.1913

40/9/2

0.0007 50/19/1

0.0053

40/2

0.1488 50/20

0.1181

40/1/2

0.1170 50/11

0.1214

13/21/2

0.0776 51/15/2

0.1039

40/1/1

0.0004

0.0964

51/15/1

13/21/1

0.0618 50/14/3

0.0152

14/25/2

0.0281 51/6

0.0325

14/25/1

0.0052 51/7/1

0.1115

TOTAL

3.3527 51/7/2

0.0805

62/21

0.0170

Sonipat Gannaur Udesipur

0.1572

51/8

62/25

0.1027 Nala

0.0391

61/16/2

0.0889 TOTAL

2.1069

61/16/1

0.0537

0.0470

Sonipat Gannaur Panchi Jatan Nala

0.0004 73/8

0.0001-

61/17/2

0,0046 73/9

0.1743

61/17/1

0.0793 CartTrack 0.0304

61/17/3

0.0321 73/10

0.1125

61/14/3

0.0208 73/1

0.1435

61/14/2

0.1183 74/5

0.0987

61/14/1

0.0263 44/25

0.1836

61/13/2

0.0009 44/16

0.0011

61/13/1

0.0925 1

44/24.

0.0712

61/8

0.1289 44/17

0.2014

61/8

0.0503 44/18/1

0.0500

61/9

0.0684 44/14

0.0062

CTR

0.0113 44/13

0.2201

61/3/2

0.0010 44/12

0.0369

61/2

0.2047 44/8

0.0114

61/1

0.0532 44/9

0.2319

46/22

0.0048 44/10/1

0.0228

46/21

0.2168 44/2

0.0225

46/20/2

0.0114 44/1

0.2071

47/25

0.0373 CartTrack 0.0278

47/16

0.2233 45/5

0.0141

47/17

0.0242 41/21

0.0186

47/15

0.0209 40/25

0.2171

47/14/2

0.1086 40/16

0.0443

47/14/1

0.1155 Fieldct

0.0213

47/13

0.0139 40/24

0.0023

47/7/3

0.0332 40/17

0.1905

47/8/5

0.0317 40/14

0.0842

47/8/4

0.0318 Field ct

0.0210

47/8/3

0.0054 40/13

0.1431

47/8/2

0.0275 261 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19, 2008/पौष 29,19293 PARINA , L

0.1230

-0.0026

10/218

47/8/1

0.0227

0.0065

CIR

47/9

Sonipat Gannaur Udesipur (Contd.)

Sonipat Gannaur Udesipur (Contd)

0.0477

16/5

0.0482

47/3

9/25

0.2064

0.2088

47/2

9/24

0.0862

0.0018

47/1

9/16

0.0002

0.0351

43/22

9/17

0.1661

0.0244

43/21

0.1343

0.0334

9/18

NALA

0.1178

9/13

0.1393

27/15

0.1810

9/12

0.0363

27/6

9/11

0.0015 27/14

0.0086

0.0711 27/7

0.1775

9/9

0.2147

0.0041

CTR

9/10

0.0413

0.0294

9/1

27/8

0.0095

8/6

0.0181

27/4

:::

8/5

0.2195

0.2197

27/3

8/4

0.0085

0.0626

27/2

0.0435

0.0031

25/23

7/25

1000.0

SENOT

0.1821

7/24

0.1895

25/22

85000

0.0005

7/17

0.1078

25/21

0.1444

25/20

2013

7.9338

TOTAL

1200.0

24/16

0100

0.1560

0.0251

CTR

Sonipat Gannaur Bhader

24/15

0.0939

0.0242

16/7

0181.0

0.2009

24/14

16/6

0120.0

0.0031

0.0056

24/13

0.0133

CTR

0,0534

24/7

0.0490

16/15

0.2233

24/8

0.1224

17/11/2

0100.0

0.0236

24/9

0.1088

17/20

1215

Vered blei i 24/3

0.0232

37100

ИЗАГО

0.2169

17/19

2020

24/2

0.2228

0.0142

0280.0

200 17/22

0.0540

24/1

0.0286

1000.0

17/18/2

00:05

CTR

0.0440

32.193

17/18/1

0.0134

0.0010

14/22

10100

17/23

0.1892

1000.0

0.1525

14/21

0.1608

17/24

0.1032

15/25

0.0035

17/25

boiledqaA

0.1552

15/16

ввоя

0.0448

26/4/1

0.1451

15/17

0.0255

26/4/2

0.1070

15/14

1510.0

0.0252

26/5/1

0.1901

15/13

longed bloit

10:00

0.2004

26/5/2

0.0032

15/12

0.0033

26/6

0.0620

200

15/8

2001.0

DISTRY

0.0362

0.2022

15/9

bortedgaA

1001.0

25/1

0.0450 000

0.0178

DRAIN

١٤١١.٥

0.1487

25/10

0.0289

15/2

14210

25/9/1

0.0386

0.0184

15/10

0.1523

25/9/2

0.2062

15/1

SEFLO

25/12

0.0402 262

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008 /PAUSA 29, 1929

25/8

0.0153

Sonipat Gannaur Bhadet

Sonipat Gannaur Purkhas

25/13

0.2159

(Condt.)

25/14

0.1116

25/17/1

0.0839

25/17/2

0.0357

25/16

0.2172

25/25

0.0220

0.0380

ASP

24/20/2

0.0138

0.1449

24/21

24/22

0.0164

2.6471

TOTAL

70/24

0.0649

Sonipat Gannaur Purkhas

70/23

0.0024

0.0614

70/17

70/18

0.1982

70/19

0.0011

0.0661

70/13/2

70/13/1

0.0028

70/12

0.2067

70/11/1

0.0051

70/9

0.0517

70/10

0.1876

0.0316

70/1/2

0.0159

Field Channel

0.0319

Cart Track

71/6

0.0016

71/5/2

0.0193

71/5/1

0.1488

0.0856

64/25

71/4

0.0001

64/24

0.1719

64/17

0.0921

64/18

0.1236

Asphalted

0.0397

Road

0.1144

64/13

0.0171

CartTrack

0.0164

Field Channel

64/12

0.1268

64/9

0.1062

64/10

0.1601

64/1

0.1131

63/5

0.1541

49/25

0.1208

0.1432

49/24/2

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii )] 3

49/24/1

0.0082

0.0266

49/17/1

(Contd.)

49/17/2

0.0824

49/18

0.1639

49/13

0,1112

49/12

0,1579

49/11

0,0021

49/9

0.1091

49/10

0.1667

Cart Track 0.0085

49/1/1

0.0943

50/5

0.1683

39/25

0.1105

39/24

0.1280

39/17

0.1744

39/19

0.0660

Cart Track 0.0051

39/14

0.0015

CartTrack 0.0094

39/13

0.1613

39/12

0.0515

Cart Track 0.0104

39/8

0.0031

39/9

0.2385

39/10

0.0027

39/2

0.0632

39/1

0.1818

0.0977

24/21

Field Channel 0.0178

25/25

0.1293

25/16/2

0.0987

0.0762

25/16/1

25/17/2

0.0191

25/17/1

0.0491

25/15

0.0014

25/14

0.2083

25/13

0.0223

0.0234

25/7

25/8

0.1742

25/3

0.1167

25/2/1

0.0510

Asphalted

Road

0.0303

Field Channel 0.0120

25/2

0.0706

14/22

0,1410 263 [भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19, 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

5 1

0.0066

0.0049

Field Channel

49/21

Sonipat Gannaur Purkhas

Sonipat Gannaur Singhkhera

CartTrack 0.0040

0.0091

14/21/2

0.2180

48/25

14/21/1

0.1010

48/24

0.0106

0.1711

14/20

48/16

0.0342 CartTrack 0.0288

0.2050

48/17

0.0035

14/11

0.0916

48/14/1

0.0345

13/16

0.2202

0.0444 13/15

48/13/2

48/13/1

0.1104 13/14

0.0089

48/8

0.1566 13/6

0.0473

0.0857

48/9

0.1924

13/7/1

0.0000 13/4

48/3

0.1131

0.0440

48/2/2

CartTrack 0.0138

0.1631

48/2/1

0.1152

13/3

48/1

0.0331

0.1345

4/23/2

0.0090-

CartTrack

0.0400

4/23/1

0.0125 4/22

0.0617

36/22/1

0.2041

36/21

0.0031

4/18/2

0.0383

36/20

0.2014

4/19

0.0243

0.0055

CartTrack

4/20

0.0043

37/25/2

4/12/2

0.0480

0.1820

37/16

4/11

0.2179

0.0000

37/15/4

4/10/2

0.0729

0.0013

37/15/3

0.0057

Field Channel

0.0032

37/15/2

0.0002

5/15

0.1263

37/15/1

5/6

0.1681

0.1225

0.1467

37/14/3

5/5

0.0118

CartTrack

5/4

0.0999

0.1702

37/7

0.0459

2/24

0.0458

37/8/1

0.0058

Field Channel

0.0077

37/4

8.6492

TOTAL

0.0143

37/3/2

0.1333

Sonipat Gannaur Singhkhera 50/24

0.2088

37/3/1

0.0318

50/23

0.010.

37/2/2

50/17

0.0202

0.0390

32/23

0.2150

50/18

32/22

0.1987

0.0086

50/19/1

0.0003

32/21

0.0462

50/13

0.0839

32/19

0.1225

50/12/2

0.1550

32/20

50/12/1

0.0767

0.1231

32/11/2

CartTrack 0.0080

0.0016

31/15/2

0.0945

50/9

0.0256

Asphalt Road

0.0192

CartTrack

0.0252

32/11/1

50/10

0.1053

0.0830

31/15/1

50/1

0.1916

0.1831

31/6

0.0434

51/5/2

0.0091

CartTrack

CartTrack 0.0091

62G1/08-14 264

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 1

0.0588

0.0480 31/5

Sonipat Gannaur Singhkhera

8/25/1

31/4

0.1986

8/25/26

0.0109 (Contd.)

Sonipat Gannaur Singhkhera (Contd.)

20/24

8/24

0.0958

0.1272 Cart Track 0.0146

8/17/2

0.0995 20/23

0.1120

8/23

0.0004 CartTrack 0.0154

8/18

0.2218 20/18

0.1562

8/19

0.0639 20/19

0.0922

8/13

0.0065 20/12

0.2014

8/12

0.1659 20/11

0.0355

8/11

0.1742 20/9

0.0131

0.0276

CartTrack

20/10

0.2090

8/10/2

0.0390 20/1

0.0302

9/15

0.0131 Cart Track 0.0257

9/6

0.1978 21/6

0.0066

9/7

0.1345 21/5

0.2270

0.0299

CartTrack

15/25

0.0676

0.0013

9/4

21/4/2

0.0694

9/8

0.0079 21/4/1

0.0156

0.0080

CartTrack

15/24

0.1691

0.1398

9/3/2

15/23

0.0605

0.1692

9/3/1

Cart Track 0.0263

CartTrack 0.0104 15/22

0.0230

0.0054

CartTrack

15/18/2

0.0178

0.0026

2/23

CartTrack 0.0028

9/2

0.0847 15/19/1

0.0854

0.1075

2/22/1

15/19/2

0.0540

2/21

15/20

0.1474

0.2102 15/11

0.0859

2/20

0.0241 14/16

0.0018

1/25

0.1558 14/15

0.2176

1/16

0.0405 14/14/2

0.0498

1/24

0.1517

0.0669

14/14/1

Sardhana

0.0722 14/7

0.1225

Distributory

1/23

0.1266 CartTrack 0,0122

10/3

0.0078

0.0485

14/8/2

TOTAL 10.8543 CartTrack 0.0184

0.0349

0.1481

14/8/1

0.0109

0.0602

14/9/1

Sonipat Gannaur Mohammadpur 14/23 Majra 28/3

28/2

0.0580 14/3

0.0078

14/22

0.1738 14/2

0.1533

14/21

0.1547

0.1777

14/1

14/20

0.0930

0.0364

7/21

15/16/2

0.1628

0.0137

CartTrack

15/16/1

0.0433

0.0162

13/5

15/17/1

0.0047

0.1578

8/25/2 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

2 1

0.0010

Sonipat Gannaur Mohammadpur 15/17/2

0.0234

15/15/1

Majra

0.0075

15/15/2

0.0206

96/Drain

0.2152

(15/14

CartTrack 0.0144

15/7

0.0111

15/13

0.0334

Sonipat Gannaur Teori

0.2068

15/8

15/3

0.0000

15/9

0.0917

15/2

0.1563

0.1533

15/1

12/21

0.0947

11/25

0.2049

0.0149

CartTrack

11/24

0.0101

11/16

0.0335

11/17

0.2211

11/18

0.0401

11/14

0.0116

0.0241

11/13/2

0.1856

11/8

0.0002

0.0880

11/12

0.1761

11/9/2

0.0007

11/9/1

11/10/2

0.0890

0.0764

0.0549

0.0204

203/Cart Track

0.0165

10/5

10/6

0.0462

Delhi Branch

0.3463

Western

Yamuna Canal

76/Cart Track 0.0180

10/8

0.1668

10/9

0.2433

0.0363

10/10

10/1

0.1963

10/2

0.0129

0.0213

235/Cart Track

0.0728

6/21

7/25

0.1486

7/16

0.1642

265

5 3

0.0661

Sonipat Gannaur Mohammadpur 7/17

0.0022 Majra(Contd. ) 7/15

7/14

02113

7/13

0.0069

7/8

0.0138

0.0436

חר

TOTAL

4.8501

60/8

0.1637

60/3

0.1199

60/2

0.1658

60/1

0.0042

58/21

0.1067

0.0673

58/22

Bhainswal

Distributory 0.1146

57/25

0.1008

57/16

0.1641

57/17/2

0.0015

0.0872

57/17/1

57/14

0.2043

57/13

0.0225

57/7

0.0225

57/8

0.2134

57/9

0.0011

0.0715

57/3

57/2

0.1589

0.0093

CartTrack

44/22

0.1542

44/21/1

0.0821

44/20

0.2037

44/11

0.0210

45/16

0.0311

45/15

0.2158

45/14

0.0027

45/6

0.0551

0.1768

45/7

45/4

0.1431

45/3

0.0985

115

0,0395

38/23

0.1644

38/22

0.0331

38/18

0.0147

38/19

0.2108

38/12

0.1074

38/11

0.1046

38/10

0.1768 266

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

0.0471

101/12

Sonipat Gannaur Pugthala

Teori (Contd.) Dabheta

Sonipat Gannaur

0.3594

101/9/2

0.0639 Distributory

0.0844

28/25

101/9/1

0.1185 28/24

0.0153

0.1117

101/2/2

0.0372

28/16

0.0607

101/2/1

28/17

0.1817

CartTrack 0.0093 28/14

0.1861

0.1991

99/22

28/13

0.0301

99/19

0.1533 28/7

0.0204

99/20

0.0141

0.1887

28/8

99/12

0.0905

0.1472

28/3

0.0867

99/11

28/2/2

0.0607

99/10

0.1554

0.0044

19/23

0.0461 28/2/1

0.0021

0.1963

99/1

19/22

0.2044

99/2

0.0002

0.1241

19/19

80/21

0,1844 19/12

0.0006

80/25

0.0012

0.0865

19/20

80/20

0,1162

0.1278

19/11/3

0.0132

80/16/2

0.0558

19/11/2

0.0500

80/16/1

0.0233

81/15

0.1554

0.0803

19/10

80/11

0.0218

0.0155

CartTrack

81/16

02124

0.1175

18/6

0.1532

81/5/1

18/4

0.0001

81/5/2

0.0003

0.2041

18/5

81/4/1

0.0381

0.0091

CartTrack

76/24/2

0.0091

0.0623

11/25

129

0.0150

0.1134

11/24

0.0173

76/25/1

0.0239

Asphalt Road

0.1557

76/24/1

0.2145

11/17

76/17

0.1589 11/18

0.0109

76/14

0.1341

0.0529

11/14

0.0999

76/13

11/13

0,1390

0.0000

76/7

CartTrack 0.0143

0.2090

76/8

0.1827

11/8

0.0069

199

11/3

0,1636

0.0027

76/3/2

Drain

0.0441

0.1052

76/3/1

3/23

0.1302

0.0869

76/2

0,0372

Cart Track

0.0012

57/23/1

0.0163

3/22

0.1983

57/22

3/19

0.0784

0.1374

57/19/2

0.0852

3/18

0.0218

57/20

3/12

0.0737

0.0111

150

3/13

0.0194

0.0332

57/19/1

7.6635

TOTAL

57/12

0.0186 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

267

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29, 1929

5 57/11

0.1679

0.0116

CartTrack Sonipat Gannaur Pugthala

Sonipat Gannaur Pugthala

0.0598

57/10/3

24/6/2

0.0440

0.0995

57/10/2

24/6/1

0.0555

0.0248

57/10/1

24/5

0.2088 57/1

0.1728

24/4/2

0.0010 58/5/1

0.0269

11/25/2

0.0573 52/21

0.0474

0.0320

11/25/1

0.1455

51/25

11/24

0.1195 51/16/1

0.1607

11/17

0.0331

0.0242

51/16/2

TOTAL

7.5401 51/15

0.1939

0.0641

52/14

Sonipat Sonipat Manoli

0.0043

51/14/2

52/7/3

0.0265 51/7/1

0.0249

52/13/1

0.1270

0.0594

51/6/2

52/8/2

0.0793

0.0271

Asphalt Road

0.1283

52/12/1

51/7/2

0.0638

52/9/2

0,0834

0.0010

51/6/1

52/11/2

0.0288 51/4/2/2

0.0963

52/10/2

0.0779 51/4/2/1/1

0.0898

52/11/1

0,0918 51/4/1

0.0037

51/15

0.1416 34/24/1

0.0296

51/6

0.0635 34/24/2(Asp

0.0955

51/14/2

0.0272

Road)

0.0455

51/14/1

34/24/3

0.1110

51/7

0.0616 24/25/1

0.0262

51/13

0.1442 34/25/2

0.0219

51/8

0.0633

0.0007

34/16

51/12

0.1340

0.2053

34/17

0.0593

51/9

34/14/1

0.1099

51/11

0.1373 34/13

0.0898

51/10 )

0.0539 34/7/2

0.0002

50/15

0.1756 34/8/1

0.1193

50/6

0.0435 34/13/2

0.0341

0.1739

50/14

0.0567

34/8/2

50/7

0.0197 34/3

0.1278

50/13

0.1861 34/2/2

0.0853

50/8

0.0081 25/23

0.0007

0.2064

50/12

25/22

0.2075

0.0000

50/9

CartTrack 0.0211

0.2064

50/11

25/19

0.0981

49/15

0.1914

0.0884

25/20

49/14

0.2090 25/12

0.0001

49/13

0.1821 25/11/2

0.1382

0.0150

354

0.0674

25/11/1

0.2039

49/12

25/10

0.0961 268

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

2 1

0.2013

49/11

Sonipat Sonipat Jakhauli

Sonipat Sonipat Manoli

48/15

0.2053

48/14

0.2006

0.1989

48/13

48/12/2

0.1138

0.0415

357

48/12/1

0.0672

0.0780

48/11/2

0.1143

48/11/1

47/15/1

0.1863

47/14

0.2112

47/13

0.1987

0.2048

47/12

47/11

0.1116

46/15

0.0005

5.6619

TOTAL

45/11

0.0822

Sonipat Sonipat Pabsara

0.2093

44/15

0.0588

44/14/2

0.0266

66(Asphalt

Road)

44/14/1

0.1143

44/13/2

0.0812

44/13/1

0.1142

44/12

0.1983

44/11

0.1971

43/15

0.0997

0.0081

43/14

1.1897

TOTAL

0.0920

115

Sonipat Hansapur

0.0006

3/10

2/15

0.0668

2/14

0.1778

0.1967

2/13

2/12

0.0571

0.5910

TOTAL

118/12

0.1036

Sonipat Jakhauli

0.2014

118/11

0.2206

119/15

0.1639

119/14

0.2315

119/13

0.1760

119/12

0.2260

119/11

0.0174

120/15/2

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

5 3

0.1859 120/15/1

120/14

0.1655

0.0061 120/7/2

120/7/1

0.0008 120/13

0.1696 120/8

0.0388 421

0.0177

0.0805 120/12/2

0.0268 CartTrack

120/9

0.0783 120/12/1

0.0332

0.0773 120/11

120/10

0.1088 430

0.0252 CartTrack 0.0171 121/6

0.1182 121/15

0.0490

0.0482 121/14

0.1490 121/7

0.0058 121/13

0.2032 121/8

0.1972 121/9

0.2002 121/10

0.2179 122/6

122/7/1

0.0951 122/7/2

0.0138 717

0.0424 CartTrack

122/8/2

0.0122

0.1326 122/8/1

322

0.0486 122/9/1

0.0526

0.1576 122/9/2

0.2193 122/10

0.0018 122/1

0.0805 123/6

0.0163 123/5

0.1893 123/27

0.0920 123/7

0.0380 123/4/2

0.1087 123/8

0.0674 123/3

0.0230 310/Road

0.0995 123/9 269 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29, 1929

5 4

123/2

14/9

0.1988

0.1047 Sonipat Sonipat Patla

Sonipat Sonipat Jakhauli

14/10

0.0745

0.2081 123/10

15/6

0.1967

0.1314

123/1

15/7

0.1913

0.0330

124/6

0.0017 124/5

0.1520

15/14

0.0002 CartTrack

0.0192

15/13

0.1235

0.0009

52/CTR

124/7

15/13

0.0072

0.2072

124/4

15/8

0.1969

0.1723 124/3

15/12

0.1955

0.0245 124/2

0.1638

15/9

124/1

0.1993

0.0983

0.0324 125/5/2

15/11

15/10

0.1394 125/5/1

0.1373

0.1664

16/15

0.0485 125/4

16/6

0.0022

0.1337 111/24

16/14/1

0.0030

0.2040

125/3

0.0019

16/14/2

0.0018 111/23

16/7

0.1915

0.1718 125/2

16/8

0.2170

0.2075 125/1

0.0083

16/3

0.0000 125/10

126/6

16/9

0.1272

0.0469

16/10

0.1269

126/5

0.0085 320

0.0269

16/2

0.0845

0.1963

0.1036

126/7

16/1

0.0302

CartTrack 0.0085 126/4

17/5

426

0.2166

0.1164

126/3

0.0004

7/25

0.0051

0.1757

17/4

0.0957 126/8

7/24

126/9

0.1695

0.1086

0.2094

17/3

0.0019 126/10

0.0476

0.2029

7/23

127/6

7/22

0.0501

8.4463

TOTAL

4.6993 13/6

0.1419

Patla

76/22

0.1387

0.2046

13/7

Sonipat Seoli

0.1432

76/19

0.0161 13/8/1

76/20

0.1322 13/8/2

0.0537

0.0801

76/21

0.0153

Cart Track

0.0006

0.1973

75/25

13/9

75/16

0.1117

0.1986 13/10/1

0.0485

CTR

0.0108 13/10/2

75/17

0.1868

0.0363

56/ AS P

75/14

14/6

0.0240

0.2052

75/18

14/7

0.0592

0.2019

75/13

0.1516

0.2075

14/8 270

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

1 1

5 2

0.2172

75/12

Sonipat Sonipat Seoli

0.1768

75/11

0.0361

75/10

0.0415

74/15

74/6

0:1626

74/7

0.2144

0.1595

74/8

0.0512

74/3

0.0259

74/9

0.1797

74/2

0.1503

74/1

CANAL

0.0845

CartTrack 0.0004

CartTrack 0.0023

0.1631

73/5

73/4

0.2045

0.1910

73/3

73/2

0.0128

3.0725

TOTAL

0.0144

15/3

Sonipat Budh Khalsa

15/2

0.1888

0.2079

15/1

14/5

0.1945

0.1963

1474

0.2009

14/3

0.1982

14/2

14/1/2

0.0355 TP-8

Ch.8322.90 m

Road

ROU

Ch. 9417.62 m

TOTAL

1.2365

in Sonipat Badh Malak Ch . 9417.62m

Road

Ch. 10301.93 m ROU

TOTAL

Ch. 10301.93 m Sonipat Jathadi

Road

ROU

Ch. 12730.31 m

TOTAL

Ch. 12730.31 m Sonipat Akbarpur

Road Barotha

ROU

Ch. 14118.68 m

TOTAL

Ch. 14118.68 m

in Sonipat Jagdishpur

Road

Ch. 14645.94m ) ROU

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

5 2

0.0155

46/11

Sonipat Sonipat Jagdishpu

0.1124

45/15

0.1279

TOTAL

0.0097

ASP

Sonipat Chhatera Bahadurpur

0.0557

3/15

ASP

0.0062

0.1953

3/14

0.1947

3/13

0.2055

3/12

0.1684

3/11

0.0696

3/20

0.0426

ASP

0.2120

4/16

0.0004

4/25

0.0123

4/24/2

0.0584

4/24/1

0.1396

4/17

0.0028

4/18

0.1805

4/23

0.0757

6/3

6/2

0.1556

6/9

0.0827

0.1896

6/10

6/11

0.0002

0.0623

ASP

0.0269

5/6/1

0.0402

5/6/2

0.0694

5/15

5/14

0.2012

0.0967

5/13

2.5542

TOTAL

0.1537

20/13

Sonipat Ladpur

20/12/2

0.1996

20/19

0.0082

20/20

0.0208

0.1726

20/11/2

0.0006

21/16

0.1939

21/15/2

0.2018

21/14/2

0.1648

21/13/2

0.0301

21/18

0.0119

Asphalt Road

0.0336

Asphalt Road 7

271

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19, 2008/पौत्र 29, 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

5 1

0.0196

CartTrack

0.0254

21/21

Sonipat Sonipati Ladpur

Sonipat Sonipat Abbaspur

0.0915

0.1758

21/19

14/25

14/24

0.2039 21/20/2

0.1820

14/23/2

0.0038

0.1202

22/16/2

25/4

0.0602

0.0120

22/16/2

0.2146

25/3

0.0175

22/25

25/2/2

0.0185

0.0150

0.0264

25/8

CartTrack 0.0316

0.1391

25/9/1

0.0190

CartTrack

0.0993

25/9/2

0.0798

Asphalt Road

0.0250

25/10.

22/17/1

0.0588

0.0191

25/12/1

0.0861

22/24/1

0.2184

25/11

22/23

0.1940

0.0586

26/15

22/18/2

0.0063

0.0036

25/20/1

22/18/1

0.0009

26/16

0.2000

0.1980

26/17/1

0.0796

0.0584

22/21

0.0105

26/17/2

0.0083

Asphalt Road

26/25

0.0000

2.4808

TOTAL

26/24/1

0.1316

0.0014

4/22

Sonipat Sonipat Abbaspur

26/24/2

0.0218 4/21

0.1338

26/23

0.1354 ASP

0.0358

0.1320

0.1922

5/25

33/2

0.1404. 5/24

0.1998

33/9

0.1227

0.1863

5/23

0.1792

33/10

0.2091

5/22

0.0788

33/11

0.1888

5/21

32/6

0.0004 6/25

0.1990

0.1127

32/15/2

0.2012

6/24

0.0956

32/15/1

6/23

0.2012

0.0060

32/14

0.2012

6/22

0.0494

32/16

6/21

0.2012

0.2160

32/17

7/25

0.2080

32/18

0.0126

0.0242

7/24

0.0136

32/23

0.2013

32/24

0.0235

15/5

43/4

0.0531 15/4

0.2285

Express

0.0016

15/7

0.2816

Highway

0.0744

15/3

0.0585

43/6

0.1696

15/8

0.0707

43/15/1

0.1114

15/9

0.0873.

43/15/2

0.1388

15/12

0.0564

42/11

0.1936 15/11

0.1601

42/20

0.0062

43/16

15/20

0.1072

0.1270

42/21

14/16

0.1391

62GI/08-15 272

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008 /PAUSA 29, 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1

5 42/22/1

0.0704

18/16

0.1427 Sonipat Sonipat Abbaspur

Sonipat Sonipat Nahsa

0.0014

8/17

0.0416 CartTrack 0.0108

8/25

0.1250 47/1

0.0016

8/24

0.0551 47/2

0.2168

12/5

0.1138 47/9

0.1172

12/4

0.0657 47/8

0.1066

12/6

0.0950 47/13

0.2190

12/7

0.0812 47/14

0.0003

12/15/1

0.0294 47/18/1

0.0240

12/15/2

0.0393 47/18/2

0.0153

0.1000

12/14/1

47/18/3

0.0758

12/14/2

0.0101 47/17

0.0797

12/16/2

0.0473 47/24/2

0.0155

12/17

0.1348 47/24/1

0.0306

0.0185

12/25

47/23

0.0066

12/25

0.0135 Nalla

0.3490

12/24/2

0.1271 51/7/1

0.0306

0.0081

12/24/2

51/7/2

0.0551

Drain

0.0203 51/6

0.0951

18/5

0.0300 51/14

0.0034

0.0142

18/4/1

51/15

0.1681

0.1302

18/4/2

51/16

0.0173

18/6

0.0165 TOTAL

9.3233

18/7

0.1606

0.0010

18/15

2/16

0.1526

Sonipat Sonipat Nahra

18/14

0.2088 2/25

0.1772

0.1642

18/7/1

CartTrack 0.0132

0.0039

18/7/2

5/5/3

0.0690

5/5/1

0.0546

18/24

0.1564 5/5/4

0.0280

30/4

0.1833 5/5/2

0.0235

30/7

0.1863 5/6

0.1718

30/14

0.1647 5/15

0.1735

0.1757

30/17

5/16

0.1846

30/16

0.0054

0.1878

5/25

0.0628

30/25

0.0117

Drain

30/24

0.0801 8/5/2

0.0125

Nahari

8/5/1

0.1560

0.1081

Distributory CartTrack 0.0146

40/5

0.1210 8/6

0.1558

0.0130

40/4

8/7

0.0054

40/6

0.1585

0.0139

8/15/1

40/15

0.1528 8/14/1

0.0011

0.0521

41/11

8/15/2

0.1489

41/20/1

0.0434 8/14/2

0.0217

0.0236

40/16 [भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

273

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19, 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

1 1

Sonipat Sonipat NahsaNahra

94/14/1

0.0061

Sonipat Sonipat

Asphalt Road

0.0699

0.0721

41/20/2

41/21

0.1864

0.1834

50/1

0.1827

50/10

50/11

0.1625

50/12

0.0382

0.0837

50/19

50/20

0.0790 Sonipat Sonipat Halapur

50/22

0.1266

50/21

0.0357

65/2

0.1636

65/1

0.0033

65/9

0.1914

0.1783

65/12

0.0751

65/19/1

65/19/2

0.1173

65/22/2

0.1365

0.0381

65/22/1

74/2

0.1677

0.0291

74/3

74/8

0.0962

74/9

0.1074

74/13/1

0.1249

74/12

0.0410

74/13/2

0.0045

74/18

0.1718

74/19

0.0030

0.0599

74/23/1

0.0004

74/22/1

(Asphalt

0.0663

-Road) 120

74/23/2

0.0473

)

0.0061

74/22/2

0.1753

86/3

86/8

0.1733

0.1895

86/13

0.0207

86/26

86/18

0.1778

0.1702

86/23/1

0.0014

86/23/2

0.1927

94/4/3

0.0910

94/8/1

94/8/2

0.0925

0.1718

94/13

Nabra

94/17/2

0.0390

94/18

0.1394

94/24/1

0.0703

94/23

0.1138

0.0277

97/4

97/3

0.0345

10.3989

TOTAL

30/4

0.0373

30/3

0.0777

30/7

0.0568

30/8

0.1135

30/14

0.0271

30/13

0.1542

30/17

0.0303

30/18

0.1537

30/24

0.0505

0.1342

30/23

35/4

0.0600

0.1231

35/3

35/7

0.0560

35/8

0.1227

0.0562

35/14

35/13

0.1336

0.0517

35/17/2

35/18

0.1188

35/24/1

0.0486

0.1298

35/23

57/4/1

0.0381

57/3/1

0.1283

57/4/2

0.0038

577

0.0502

57/8

0.1451

57/14

0.1752

57/13

0.0024

57/17/2

0.0448

57/18

0.1189

Road

0.0172

57/24

0.0498

0.0306

57/23/1

57/23/2

0.0437

57/23/3

0.0188

57/23/4

0.0143

57/23/5

0.0161

60/3/1

0.0125

60/3/2

0.0136 274

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

60/3/3

0.1121 Sonipat Sonipat Halapur

60/4

0.0493

60/8

0.1399

60/7

0.0372

60/14

0.0199

60/13

0.0694

Canal

0.0030

113

0.5824

81/3/1

0.0291

81/3/2

0.0150

81/4

0.0023

81/7

0.0153

81/8/1

0.0608

81/8/2

0.0728

81/8/3

0.0473

81/14/1

0.0104

81/14/2

0.0098

0.0815

81/13/1

81/13/2

0.0633

81/17/2

0.0302

81/18

0.1517

0.0374

81/24/1

81/23

0.1398

84/4/1

0.0460

84/3

0.1344

84/7

0.0518

84/8

0.1215

84/14

0.0677

84/13

0.1273

84/18

0.0563

84/17

0.0074

TOTAL

5.0517

97/17

Kharkhoda Nahri

0.0512

0.0517

97/18

97/24/1

0.0331

97/24/2

0.0229

97/23

0.1409

98/4/1

0.0038

98/4/2

0.0118

98/3

0.0359

TOTAL

0.3513

0.0790 Kharkhoda Jinjauli 11/4

11/3

0.0321

0.0228

11/8/1

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] 2

11/7/1

0.0692 Kharkhoda Jinjauli

0.0759

74(Canal)

0.0752

11/7/3

0.0049

11/8/2

11/13

0.0025

0.1129

11/17

0.1729

0.0036

0.1774

11/24/1

11/23

0.0063

28/4

0.1817

28/3

0.0014

28/7/1

0.1319

28/7/2

0.0545

28/14

0.1745

28/17/1

0.0516

28/17/2

0.1283

28/24 .

0.1793

33/4/1

0.1290

33/4/2-

0.0395

33/4/3

0.0176

0.1776

33/7

33/14/1

0.0277

33/14/2

0.1502

33/17

0.1754

33/24

0.1860

49/4

0.1902

49/7

0.1701

49/14

0.1845

49/17

0.1883

49/24

0,1732

52/4

0.1614

52/7

0.1863

52/14

0.1332

52/17

0.0758

52/24

0.0404

64/4

0.0060

Western

Yamuna

Canal

0.3011

4.4513

TOTAL

[File No : L- 14014/28/07-G.P. ]

S. B. MANDAL, Under Secy.

[भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

। श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 20 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 108. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . इंडियन एयर लाइन्स के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 2 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 134/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-12-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -11012/ 16/ 2005 - आई आर ( सी-1 ) ]

275

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

relief is the workman entitled and from what date ." The workman applicant has filed claim statement. In the claim statement it has been stated that the applicant/ workman was appointed as a permanent worker in the respondent department on 07-08-1990 as a Loader and was deployed to work at IGI Airport's Terminal - II , New Delhi No appointment letter was given to the applicant/workman by the respondent . No salary slip was given by the respondent and the respondent was also not given any account to the applicant/workman with regard to PF / ESI contribution.

स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT New Delhi , the 20th December , 2007 S.O. 108. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 134/ 2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- labour Court , 2 , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , inthe industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Indian Airlines , and their workmenwhich was , received by the Central Government on 19-12-2007

[No. L. 11012/ 16/2005 - IR (C-I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR. COURT- II, NEW DELHI PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N. RAL.

ID. Nos . 134/2005

In the Matter of:- Shri Prem Parkash Arya , S/o. Shri Murari Lal Arya, M-40 , Mahaluxmi Garden, Near Railway Station , Gurgaon-122006 (Haryana),

VERSUS

TheManaging Director, Indian Airlines , Airlines House (HQ) , Plot No. 113, Gurdwara Rakab Ganj Road, NewDelhi .

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 16/ 2005 IR(C- 1) Central Government Dt. 19-12-2005 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The point runs as hereunder:

"Whether the demand of Shri Prem Prakash Arya, Sweeper from the management of Indian Airlines for reinstatement in service is justified? If so , to what That the respondent was practicing unfair labour practice since beginning . Due to this reason the applicant/ workman who was working as a Loader in the respondent department from 07-08-1990, his designation was changed from 08-11-94. The applicant/workman was in need ofjob and due to fear of losing the same the applicant/workman was forced to work as Sweeper. The applicant/workman had served at various sub -departments of the respondent . The respondent was assigning various types of duties to the applicant/workman such as peon duty , sweeper duty and dispatching and filing work in the office. The applicant/ workman is graduate . But due to poverty the applicant/ workman is forced work as peon / loader/ sweeper .

That the applicant/ workman was issued one gate pass/ daily permit pass by the respondent to enter in the premises of respondent. The respondent on the other hand had shown the applicant/workman on contract basis w.e.f. 08-11-1994 but no alleged contractor was engaged by the respondent under whom the applicant/workman had ever work. This is nothing but camouflage contact which never exist . All the petty cash vouchers are signed by the concerned officer of the respondent . The applicant/ workman was serving from 9.00 AM to 5.30 PM daily but as per record he was shown on duty. from 9.00 AM to 4.30 PM . The applicant/workman was paid Rs . 56/- per day by the respondent but whereas the applicant/workman was. carrying out duty from morning to evening regularly .

That the respondent illegally deducting the salary/ wages ofthe applicant/workman if the used to take leave . The applicant/workman was discharging his duties honestly and with dedication and gave no chance of any misconduct etc. during his service career . The respondent changed the cadre/nature of work of the applicant/workman from 08-11-1994 from loader (who was appointed on regular basis) to sweeper on alleged contract basis . The applicant/ workman had performed duty at booking office at Parliament House for two days i.e. on 25/26-09-1996 .

That the respondent in order to victimize the workman had planned to remove the applicant/workman from service without any cause or reason . In this , the respondent Sh . Savtantra Kumar, Deputy Manager and Shri Y. Shanker , Duty Manager , with malafide intentions on 26-10-1998 shown the name of applicant/ workman from Prem Prakash Arya to Parveen Kumar in the petty cash vouchers . The 276

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

applicant/workman had served at various places namely reservation office of the respondent at PTI Building , Parliament Street, New Delhi . Because applicant/workman was demanding and requesting the respondent to regularize his services on the ground that he had been working since long. The intention of the respondent was malafide while showing the changed name of the applicant/workman in the petty cash vouchers from 26-10-1998 to 31-10-1998 . However, the applicant/workman continued to sign on said vouchers as Prem Parkash Arya which is his original name.

That the respondent while pursuing unfair labour practice, stopped entry of the applicant/workman in the premises of respondent department w.e.f. 09-02-1999 . The applicant/ workman was given no benefits of any retrenchment compensation etc. while illegally terminating his services . The due and earned wages of the applicant/ workmanwas not paid as per the enhanced rates . But on the other hand the respondent was discriminating in paymentof salary /wages to the applicant/workman. On25-01-1991, as per the Govt . order he was to pay Rs . 102 per day and to Rs . 127 per day from 08-05-1996 but was paid only Rs . 56 per day . The copy of the said letter is annexed as Annx. A- I & A-2.

That the applicant/ workman served a legal notice dated 13-11-1999 through is counsel on the respondent but the respondent gave no response . Subsequently , one reminder to this legal notice was also sent on 11-02-2000 to the respondent but respondent gave no response . The applicant /workman submitted various representations to the respondent and other authorities praying for his reinstatement with the respondent but the applicant/ workman could not get any help .

That on the other hand the respondent had not terminated or removed the similary placed the workmen who were working alongwith the applicant/workman the name of some of them are Sh . Vijay Pal , Shri Nem Babu , Shri Mahesh Kumar, Shri Jai Parkash , Shri Hira Lal who were working as casual sweeper at the PTI Building and there were subsequently transferred to the head quarter of the respondent and their services were regularized.

That in the year 2000 , the applicant/workman approached one lawyer , and requested him to pursue his matter. The applicant/workman is no legally trained persón and as per the legal advice he had filed one civil suit praying to issue a decree for mandatory injunction against the defendant/respondent to reinstate him and give all the benefit as are given to the regular employee . However, the said suit was decided against the plaintiff/ applicant/ workman on 21-01-2004 by which the Ld Civil Judge , Delhi directed the applicant/ workman to approach Labour Court cum Industrial Tribunal established as per the appropriate Act by the Government . For no fault of the applicant/ workman and due to wrong advice and guidance by the advocate his case continued in civil court for almost 4-5 years. The copy of the order dated 21-01-2004 is annexed asAnnx . A-3 .

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] Thatthe applicant/workman filed one claim statement before ALC/Conciliation Officer ( CG) , New Delhi on 07-06-2000. The ALC concerned on the basis of wrong submissions of the respondent that the applicant/workman was not the employee of the respondent , the matter cannot be entertainedby the ALC. The ALC unfortunatelydid not appreciate the contention of the applicant/workman and dismissed the claim petition . Subsequently, the applicant/ workman approached the Ministry of Labour & Employment (CG), New Delhi and this matter was referred by the appropriate government before your Honour.

That the applicant/wokman has sufficient evidence to prove the averments made in the claim statement etc. which the applicant/workman shall prove at the time of evidence . The applicant/Workman belongs to Balmiki Community ( Schedule Caste) and , is having poor background . The applicant/workman was expecting that his services are permanent and will also get promotion being educated. But on the other hand the respondent who was pursuing unfair labour practice, terminated the services of the applicant/workman illegally, arbitrarily and without issuance of any show cause notice , without conducting any enquiry , without payment of any compensation and due benefits to the applicant/workman . The applicant/workman who is now 37 years old is not getting any job and is unemployed from the date of termination till today. He is managing to survive by taking loans/help from the relatives in very difficult situation .

TheManagement has filed written statement. In the written statement it has been stated that the statement of claim filedby the claimant is liable to be rejected in view of the fact that the claimant has not come to this Hon 'ble Court with clean hands . The Claimant has concealed material facts which disentitles him from seeking any relief as claimed .

That the claimant was engaged as a part time daily rated casual Safaiwala on day to day basis for only 3 to 4 hours a day as per exigencies of workto clean/ sweep the then booking office of the management located at PTI building premises . The claimant was paid remuneration as per the actual days of the work . The claimant was never engaged on a permanent basis as alleged . On the contrary, he was engaged on a casual daily rated part time basis for a short period of time for the jobs of cleaning/sweeping and his services were disengaged/ discontinued after posting of a permanent employee at the Booking Office . The claimant has no lien against the post .

That the claim is liable to be dismissed as the statement of claim is without any basis and not maintainable . It is submitted that the management has its own statutory Recruitment and Promotion Rules and all permanent appointments are made in accordance with the rules . The management is also required to follow the Govt. instructions with regard to reservations for SC's ST's OBC's and physically Handicapped etc.besides [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

reservations as applicable and admittedly the engagement of the workman was not as per the abovementioned procedure.

It is specifically denied that the claimant was appointed as a permanent worker with the management in the post of loader on 07-08-1990 and was deployed at IGI Airport, Terminal II , New Delhi. It is submitted that the claimantwas enaged as a part time daily rated safaiwala on day to day basis for 3 to 4 hours in a day for cleaning/ sweeping ofthe Booking Office ofthe management located at PTI Building premises . Subsequently , on posting of a permanent safaiwala at the Booking Office of the services ofthe claimant was disengaged/discontinued. It is further submitted that as the claimant was never appointed on permanent basis , therefore , there arises no question of issuing him appointment letter . Further , it is submitted that the claimant was paid wages on day to day basis @ Rs . 42 per day as per the number ofdays he worked and therefore there arises no question of issuing him a salary slip etc. It is denied that the management was practicing unfair labour practice . It is further denied that the designation of the workman was changed from Loader to Sweeper on 8th November, 1994. It is further denied that the workman was ever appointed on permenent basis . It is specifically denied that the management has assigned various types of duties such as peon/sweeper/loader dispatching and filing work in the office to the claimant . It is specifically submitted that the services of the claimant was engaged only ondaily rated part - time basis for sweeping/ cleaning of the Booking Office of the management situated at PTI premises.

It is specifically denied that the claimant had been engaged on contract basis w.e.f. 08-11-94 by the management . It is denied that the claimant was paid Rs . 56 per day and was serving from 9.00 AM to 5:30 PM . The claimant should be put to strict proof of the said averments .

It is denied that the claimant was appointed as loader on permanent basis and the cadre/nature of his job was changed to sweeper w.e.f. 08/11/94 on contract basis . It is further denied that salary/ wages were deducted by the management, whenever the claimant used to be on leave. It is submitted that the claimant was paid remuneration on day to day basis @ Rs . 42 per days as per the actual days ofworking. The claimant was never appointed against any post on regular basis as alleged and the claimant should be put to strict proof the same .

It isdenied that the management of any of its officials have ever triedto victimize the claimant in any manner or changed his name in any of the petty cash vouchers as alleged. The claimant should be put to strict proof regarding the said allegations .

It is submitted that the claimant was engaged as a casual daily rated part - time safaiwala as per the exigencies ofwork and was paid remuneration as per actual days of working. His services were disengaged when there was no

277

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

more work for him . Annexure A- I shows the rate of daily wages paid to casual daily rated workers for full days work and the said annexure is not applicable to casual daily rated part -time worker's like the claimant/workman who was engaged for a few hours in a day and not for full day.

The claimant is not entitled to any retrenchment compensation etc , because he is not fulfilling the statutory requirement of being retrenched from the services . His services have not been terminated illegally by the management . On the other hand , the services of the claimant were disengaged when there was no more work for him after the posting of a permanent employee at the then Booking Office at PTI Building . The claimant has never worked at any other place of the management except the thenBooking Office of the Management.

It is submitted that the claimant was engaged on casual daily rated part -time basis and were disengaged whenwas no more required due to unavailability of work and as such no reply to the legal notice was given .

The claimant should be put the strict proof of the same . The services ofthe claimant have not been terminated illegally by the management . On the other hand , as there was no work available the services of the claimant were disengaged. It is submited that as to the knowledge of the management , the claimant is gainfully employed, It is denied that the management practices unfair labourpractice.

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder. In the rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement . The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement .

Evidence of both the parties has been taken.

Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.

From the pleadings of the parties the following issues arise for adjudication:

1. Whether the workman has completed 240 days work in the years of his employment?

2. Whether the workman is entitled to reinstatement?

3. To what amount ofback bages the workman is entitled?

4. Relief ifany?

ISSUE NO . 1 .

.Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that he was appointed as a permanent Loader in the respondent department on 07-08-1990 as a Loader and was deployed to work at IGI Ariport , Termnal II , New Delhi . His designation was changed on 08-11-1994 and he was forced towork as a sweeper in view ofneed of the job and due fear of losing the same he accepted the change . He served various departments from 07-08-1990 to 09-02-1999 . The 278

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

management stopped entry of the workman illegally and arbitrarily. The workman has not even paid his due wages.

It was submitted from the side of the management that the claimant was engaged as a part time daily rated casual safaiwala on day to day basis only for 3 to 4 hours aday as per exigencies of work to clean and sweep the booking office ofthe management allocated at PTI Building . Payment to him was made as per his actual days ofworking. He was never engaged on permanent basis .

The workman has filed WE- 1 / 557 gate passes issued by the Bureau of Civil Aviation from 07-08-1990 to 06-09-1990 . This discloses the entry of the workman as a Loader.He has annexed with the record other photocopies ofgate passes which show the working of the workman up to the last of 1997. Some gate passes have been issued by Sr. Manager , Security. These gate passes are on the letter head of the management and have been duly signed sometimes Dy . Manager sometimes Sr. Manager . The signatures on these photocopies have not been specifically denied by the management.

The management was requested to file originals of all the documents but the management took the stand that the originals of the photocopy documents filed by the workman have been weeded out , and are not available .

InIDicases the original documents are always in the possession of the management as these are management's documents . The originals passes are taken by the management when new passes are issued , so the workman cannot be said to be in the possession of the original gate passes . These photocopy gate passes bear signature and seal of the management and they are on the letter of the management . It cannot be even presumed that the workman forged the signature of the Dy . Manager and Sr. Manager . Thus , these photocopy gate passes are admissible in evidence. The management has deliberately concealed the original.

The workman has filed documents relating to the engagement of other employees who have been made permanent by the management . These documents also indicate that the version of the workman is correct .

Theworkman has filed 571 vouchers ofpayment made tohim as daily wage of the years 1994, 1995 , 1996, 1997, 1998 & 1999. The management witness has admitted that the workman was paid through petty cash vouchers . Such petty cash vouchers are kept for onty 5 years. The management witness has also stated that he could not recollect the names of the officers who have allegedly signed the documents produced by the workman .

The wrorkman has filed the list of names of 25 officers who have signed several petty cash vouchers and gate passes . This witness has not denied the signature ofthe officers on all the photocopy documents filed by the workman. The management witness has further stated that after checking the names of the officers he could file certificatewhether the officers have signed the photocopies

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] filed by the workman. The management has not filed such certificate.

The management witness has further admitted that except one month when the workman was not working he was working for 4 years on need basis as a casual daily rated part time safaiwala.

It was argued by the management that the workman was engaged as part timer . The management witness has admitted that there was no other part time employee as it was sub - office. In case there was no other part time employee , it becomes obviously true that this workman was working for the whole day . At PTI Building there is booking office of the management. For a booking office there is requirement of a permanent peon . The management witness has admitted that there was no other part time employee in the sub- office. It implies that it was the workman who worked the whole day in that sub -office.

The workman has filed Ex . WE1 /572 . This is Police Verification paper of the workman and it has been mentioned on the back ofthis police verification that there are nothing adverse against Sh . Prem Prakash Arya . This certificate is dated 01-08-1990 . The workman was Initially engaged on this date . WE 1/573 is a photocopy document of 1990 in which the workman has been given the designation of sweeper and number has also been assigned as 225282. In WEI/574 dated 03-08-1990 the workman has been shown as casual Loader . All these photocopy documents show that initially the workman was engaged as Loader after police verification. He was then engaged as sweeper and he was given the sweeper number .

Itis settled law that ifthe management fails to produce the original documents , photocopies become admissible in evidence , if these copies have some nexus to the original documents .

In the instant case all the photocopy documents are onthe letter head of the management and there is seal and signature of the officers of the management . Such documents cannot be said to be manipulated . The workman has filed about 571 documents to establish his working for 240 days in every year of his employment.

Ithas been held in air 1986 SC 458 as under:

"The expression " actually worked under the employer" cannot mean those days only when the workman worked with hammer , sickle or pen , but must necessarily comprehended all those days during which he was in the employment of the employer and for which he had been paid wages either under express or implied contract of service or by compulsion of statute , standing orders etc. Thus , Sundays and other paid holidays should be taken into account for the purpose of reckoning the total number of days on which the workman could be said to have actually worked . " [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

In case Sundays and Holidays are calculated as per vouchers submitted by the workman he has worked for more than 240 days in all the years ofhis employment . The management witness has also admitted that the workman hasworked for 4 years .

That Sundays and Holidays are to be calculated while counting the working days of a workman. It may be that the workman may not have kept all the photocopy documents ofpayment vouchers . The management witness has categorically stated that the workman has worked for 4years . He was the only employee in the sub- office, so it cannot be said that he was a part time employee . The workman has worked for 240 days in all the years of his employment right from 1990 to 1999. He has worked for 10 years as a whole day workman . He has been paid less but this aspect is not being considered here.

From perusal ofthe documents filed by the workman it is substantially found proved that he has worked for 240 days in every year of his employment right from 1990 to1999 .

This issue is decided accordingly.

ISSUE No. 2 .

Itwas submitted from the side of the management thatreinstatement is not the only relief in all the cases of illegal termination. Section 11 A of the IDAct, 1947 provides for payment of compensation also .

Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that compensation is payable in cases where an undertaking has become sick or it has been closed or it is in economic loss. It has not been established that the management is in economic loss and it is a sick Industry . My attention was drawn bythe Ld. Counsel ofthe workman to 2000 LLR 523 State ofUP and Rajender Singh . The Hon'ble Apex Court ordered reinstatement with full back wages as the services of the daily wager cleaner who worked for 4 years was dispensed with without following the procedure for retrenchment . In the instant case also no retrenchment compensation has been paid . This case law squarely covers the above case of th Hon'ble Supreme Court.

It has been held in 1978 Lab IC 1668 that in case service ofa workman is terminated illegally the normal rule is to reinstate him with full back wages .

My attentionwas further drawn to AIR 2002 SC 1313 . The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that daily wager even ifserving for a short period should be reinstated .

Itwas submitted from the side ofthe workman that in the instant case Sections 25 F, G ofthe ID Act are attracted. In Section 25 of the ID Act it has been provided that if a workman has performed 240 days work and if the work is of continuous and regular nature he should be given pay in lieu ofnotice and retrenchment compensation.

It has been held by the Hon'ble Apex Court that there is no cessation of service in case provisions of 62GI /08-16

279

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

Section 25 F are not complied . In the instant case no compensation has been paid to the workman.

In case aworkman has worked for 240 days in a year and the work is of continuous and regular nature he should be paid retrenchment compensation . In case retrenchment compensation is not paid Section 25 F of the ID Act is attracted. There is no cessation of his services . He is deemed continued in service in the eye of law. In case there is breach of Section 25 F the service is continued and reinstatement follows as a natural consequence.

ID Act, 1947 has been enacted to safeguard the interest of the workmen belonging to poor segment of society . It appears that legislature wanted that such workmen should not be harassed unnecessarily so Section 25 F , U, T and Clause 10 of Vth Schedule have been enacted. The objects and reasons . of ID Act, 1947 show that the respondent management should not be permitted to indulge in any unfair labour practice . The workmen should not be engaged for years and then they should be removed all of a sudden . There is provision of retrenchment Retrenchment compensation for his removal . compensation is for compensating him otherwise so that he can survive long interregnum of unemployment. In the instant case no retrenchment compensation has been paid.

Itwas further submitted that the Constitution Bench Judgment has afforded a right according to which the Government is not precluded from making temporary appointments or engaging workers on daily wages .

The Government is at liberty to give temporary appointment no doubt but the mandatory provisions of Section 25 F of the ID Act, 1947 are to be followed and along with retrenchment the management has to pay retrenchment compensation even for temporary employees who have worked continuously for 240 days.

Fixed' term tenure appointments and temporary appointments cannot be the rule of public employment . At the time of making temporary appointments Articles 14 & 16 are infringed . There is no constitutional mandate that the Government is at liberty to go on giving fixed term appointments for the entire tenure of service .

No such Article of the Constitution has been pointed out under which the Government or Public Sector units can continue incessantly to give temporary and fixed term appointments again and again . Since fixed term appointments and temporary appointments are not governed by any constitutional scheme , such discrimination will amount to vicious discretion . The Government of Public Sector unit will go on resorting to themethod ofpick and choose policy and give temporary and adhoc appointments to their favourites and thus the principles of equality enshrined in the constitution will be given a go bye . Such is not the intent of the Hon'ble Apex Court . However, in this judgment the provisions of the ID Act governing the services of the workman have not been 280

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008 /PAUSA 29 , 1929

declared un -constitutional . Reinstatement is the remedy : provided in the ID Act for breach of several provisions enumerated therein or for breach of various labour welfare legislations.

A three Judges bench of the Hob'ble Apex Court hasheld in 1993 - II - LLJ that termination of services affects the livelihood of not only of the employee but also of the dependents . So in case of illegal termination of service the workman should be reinstated. Reinstatement should not be misconceived as regularization . By the order of reinstatement the status quo ante of the workman is restored. He is given back wages in order to compensate him for hisillegal dis - engagement . This is a special remedy provided in ID Act and it has not been annulled and set aside by any judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court . The provisions of the ID Act are still constitutional and they are to be given effect too .

In case the workman is reinstated with back wages the respondents have every right , after payment of back wages andreinstatement, to retrench him validly following the principles of first come last go so that Sections 25 , G& H of the IDAct are not violated . From perusal ofthe records it becomes quite obvious that the workman has rendered 10 years service to the management . He is not employed in any establishment. The work is still existing. In such circumstances there cannot be any order for compensation. In case work is in existing , the workman is to be reinstated.

In view ofthe law cited above and the facts pertaining inthis case, the workman is entitled to reinstatement .

This issue is decided accordingly.

ISSUE No. 3 .

It was submitted by the management that payment of full back wages is not the natural consequence of the orderofdischarge or dismissal being set aside . It has been held in (2003) 6 SCC 141 that it is incumbent upon the labour court to decide the quantum of back wages .

It has been further held in this case that payment of back wages having discretionary element involved it is to be dealt with the facts and circumstances of the case . No definite formula can be evolved.

In 1978 Lab IC 1968-three Judges Bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court held that payment of full back wages is the normal rule . In case services have been illegally terminated either by dismissal or discharge or retrenchment, in such circumstance the workman is entitled to full back wages except to the extent he was gainfully employed during the enforced idleness . In the instant case the workman was always ready to work but he was not permitted on account of invalid act of the employer.

In 2005 IV AD SC 39 - three Judges Bench of the Hon'bleApex Court held that reinstatement with full back wages is justified. In this case the workman has performed more than 240 days work and he has been retrenched without payment of compensation and pay in lieu ofnotice .

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] The workman has rendered continuous service for at least 10 years . He is not employed in any industry or undertaking/ establishment . He may be doing some sort of job off and on thought he is not employed in any industry.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case the workman is entitled to 25% back wages .

This issue is decided accordingly.

ISSUE No. 4.

From the issue Nos . 1 , 2 & 3 decided above the workman applicant is entitled to reinstatement/ regularization along with 25 % backwages.

The reference is replied thus:

The demand of Shri Prem Prakash Arya, Sweeper from the management of Indian Airlines for reinstatement in service is justified. The workman applicant is entitledto reinstatement along with 25 % back wages within two months from the date of the publication of the award .

The award is given accordingly.

Date: 13-12-2007

R. N. RAI, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 24 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 109. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 क़ा 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार केन्द्रीय बकरी अनुसंधान संस्थान के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 261/89 ) को प्रकाशित करत्ती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-12-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[फा. सं. एल -42011/22/ 88 - डी-2 ( बी ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 24th December , 2007 S.O. 109. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 261/89 ) ofCentral Government Industrial Tribunal- Cum -Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employer in relation to the management of Central Institute for Research on Goats and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on24-12-2007.

[F. No. L-42011 /22/88 - D . 2 (B) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI R. G. SHUKLA, PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT, KANPUR Industrial Dispute No. 261 of 1989 In the matter of dispute between:

Uttar Pradesh Khetihar Mazdoor Congress 2/236 Namneir Agra .

281

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

And Central Institute for Research on Goats Makhdoom P.O. Farah District Mathura

AWARD

1. Central Governmeat, MOL, New Delhi vide its notification no . L-42011 /22/ 88 -D , 2 (B) dated 24-10-89 has seferred the following dispute for adjudication to this ribunal:-

have raised the present industrial dispute. In the claim statement it is denied that on 12-10-87 they had assaulted Nand Kishore at all. In any case without holding any enquiry the services could not be brought to an end, and since the services have been dispensed with, without any departmental inquiry , the action of the management is bad in law and all the concerned workmen are entitled for their reinstatement with full back wages continuity of service and all consequential benefits attached with the post.

"Whether the Director, Central Institute for Research Farah (Mathura) wasjustified in dismissing Sri Panna Lal and 17 others as per list enclosed w.e.f. 19-10-87 If not to what relief are the workmen entitled and from what date? "

5. The opposite party has filed reply in which it is alleged that the incident is true . In this regard F.I.R. was lodged and criminal case is pending . It is further alleged that there was no need to hold inquiry since all the employees were daily rated employee and working with the opposite party as casual labours . The action of the managernent was perfect, legal and justified and the workmen involved in the reference order are not entitled for any relief.

2. At the outset it may be pointed out that in the instant my learned predecessor vide award dated 23-10-96 has answered the reference in favour of the workmen involved in the reference order as per list annexed thereto. The opposite party being aggrieved by the said award challenged the same before the Hon'ble High Court by filing Civil Misc . Writ Petition no . 6149 of 97 which was ultimately decided by the Hon'ble Court vide Judgment dated 1-3-2007 , remanding the case to the Industrial Tribunal for deciding the same afresh after providing opportunities of hearing to the contesting parties .

3.On receipt of the certified copy of the order of the Hon'ble High Court, the tribunal issued notices to the contesting parties on 19-4-07 fixing 1-5-07 for hearing, although the representative for the workmen put his appearance before the tribunal on 2-4-07 but since no Presiding Officer was there in the tribunal upon completion of earlier.Presiding Officer w.e.f. 20-1-07 therefore no substantial proceedings in the case could be held under the direction of the Hon'ble High Court on 2-4-07 . The Presiding Officer resumed the charge of the Tribunal on 19-4-07 when the instant file was placed before me and after going through the orders of the Hon'ble High Court 1-5-07 was fixed as date of hearing of the case . Final arguments in the case were heard on 1-12-07.

6. As pointed out above , both contesting parties were given adequate opportunities to adduce their respective evidence , after remand of the case from the Hon'ble High Court, whereas the union has examined its sole witness Sri Pancham Singh who adduced evidence on his behalf as well as other co - employees involved in the case and after his evidence was closed, the authorised representative for the workmen closed his evidence . The authorised representative for the 'opposite Party on 22-6-07 moved an application before the tribunal to the effect that he wants to cross examination ofthe remaining workers involved in the case on which auth. rep . for the union objected on the ground that the evidence of the workmen stands concluded and the management may be directed to produce a list of witnesses to be examined by them. On thesaid application the tribunal vide order dated 22-6-07 directed the management that in case they wantto cross examine the remaining workers they may do so at their own expenses and both contesting parties were directed to produce list of witnesses together with their address before the Tribunal: Thereafter the cross exminantion of the remining witnesses were concluded and the management also adduced their evidence in support of theircase.

7. I have heard the learned reprereentative for both sides and have carefully gone through evidence as led by theparties.

8. As already detailed above initially an award was given by my learned predecessor on 23-10-96 in which it has been held that the dismissal of all the above eighteen persons was bad in law since no disciplinary inquiry was heldby the management before they were dismissed . The management had argued before the learned predecessor that in case there was no enquiry ever held by the management even then the management can prove charges against the delinquent but learned predecessor did not agree because this was not pleaded by the management in their statement of claim. The management feeling aggrieved approached the Hon'ble High Court where it was held that 4.Now comingto the merit and Case of the workmen , before discussing the same it is pertinent to highlight the brief facts of the contesting parties . In short the case ofthe union as set up on behalf of the 18 workmen involved in the case mentioned in the annexure to the schedule of reference order are that they are casual daily rated workers of the opposite party Central Institute for Research on Goats Makhdoom Farah , Mathura District . According to the management on 12-10-87 at about 1 1.50 a.m. all these concernend workmen in furtherance oftheir common object had assauled Nand Kishore , the then Administrative Officer of opposite party who was sitting in his official Jeep No. U. S 07627 and also threatened to kill him. On account of this misconduct the opposite party had dispensed with the services of the concerned workmen by order dated 19-10-87 . Feeling aggrieved these workmen 282

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008 /PAUSA 29, 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

rescued him then why they were not produced and when he says that other persons were also accompanying him then why those were not examined . He could not say as before which ALC the matter was being negotiated . It is also not on record as to how the workers reached at the point time and place at 11.50 a.m. when they were actually performing their duties at a distance of 15-16 kilometre and could not have gone out of premises without the permission of their superiors especially when it could not be established that at the relevant point of time they were having lunch interval , on the contrary it has been established that the lunch hours were at about 1.00 p.m. Under these circumstances the testimony of the sole witness is corroborated by doubts and thus the charges against these workers cannot be said to have been established with the help of this witness .

the management be given opportunity to prove the charges against the delinquents and thus the case was remanded back to this tribunal with the above observations . The management were therefore, given opportunity to prove the charges against the above eighteen persons . The management summoned each worker who had filed affidavit denying the all egations made by the management and learned for the the management cross examine each ofthem atlength except one who died during the pendency of the case. In their cross examination workers statement differed at some places on trival points but remained intact with regard to denying the charges against them on 12-10-87 at about 11.50 a.m. to the effect that they in furtherance of their common object had assaulted Nand Kishore Admini- strativeOfficer of the management when he was in official jeep No. US 07627 and also threatend to kill him.

10. The learned authorised representative for the management has argued that these workers were daily ated casual workers and they could have been dispensed with their services as the do not have any right to their post . The learned authorised representative for the workrnen has relied upon the judgment of the Hon 'ble Suprerne Court in Civil appeal No. 2280 of 2000 arising out of SLP ' C ' No.9648 of 1999 in which the casual labours werecharged and prosecuted for the offence 324, 427 and 504 I.P.C. The criminal court acquitted them but meanwhile the management in that case dispensed with the services of those casual labours and no disciplinary inquiry was heldby the management in that case . The Hon'ble Supreme Court held that those labourers could not be dismissed without holding domestic inqury, Similarly here also since the 18 workers were having worked for more than 240 days with the management it is deemed that they acquired temporary status and therefore,domestic enquiry was condition precedent for passing of order of removal from service of these workers . At any rate this argument that these workers could have been removed from service without conducting any deptt. enquiry being daily rated employees did not find favour before the Hon'ble High Court . The Hon'ble Court while remainding the case had directed this cout to give an opportunity to prove charges against these workers on the basis of which they were removed and not to evaluate the case of management regarding daily rated employee. Since , as held above , the evidence of Nand Kishore lacs confidence , it cannot be held that the charges against the workers have been established before this tribunal . Consequently it is hereby held that the dismissal of the workers was illegal and as such the impugned order of the management is not valid under the law. It follows that each of the worker deserves to be reinstated in the services of the management . I am informed that the management is regularly making payment oftheir wages as per directions of the Hon'ble High Court therefore such payment by the management shall be deemed as back wages and no seperate order is required to be passed with respect to back wages .

9. The management produced Nand Kishore as sole witness to establish the fact that he was beaten by these workers as alleged by the management . Nand Kishore though stated that he was beaten by these workers on 12-10-87 at about 11.50 a.m. when he was sitting in the official jeep and stated that he had sustained injuries and was medically examined but it is strange to note that no medical report has been filed by the management . The medical officer has also not been examined by the management. Nand Kishore in his previous statement on 13-8-96had stated that he was accompanied by two guards of DIG while on this court on 16-11-07 stated that the said guards were ofMathura Refinery . At any rate these guards were independent witnesses but they have not been examined. Thedriver of the jeep was also material witness and has not been examined . Mr. HS Sharma , Asstt. Admn. Officer ofthe management on 29-6-07 had submitted that besides Nand Kishore driver of the jeep security guard and Anil Behari Assistant Administrative Officer shall be examined by the management . These were the material witnesses ofthe occurrance but except Nand Kishore none was examined, The reasons for not examining them have not been given except the management remained taking time to produce them but after having availed sufficient opportunity , they were denied further time . In the absence ofother material witness the alleged occurrance could not be established without corroboration by the independent witness who were available and not examined the presumption can very well be taken that in case these witness would have been examined they would have not supported the case of the management . The acquittal of theworkers by the criminal court, though not biding to this case court nevertheless this is a strong circumstances giving room for doubt about the actual occurrence which is alleged to have taken place . It is true that the degree of proof as required in civil court is lessor than in criminal casebutat the same time the sole testimony ofNand Kishore must inspire confidence when he says that he was beaten and sustained injuries then why the medical report was kept out of record. Again he said that the guards have [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

11. The reference order is therefore , answered accordingly.

R. G. SHUKLA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 24 दिसम्बर , 2007.

का.आ. 110. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एम. टी एन. एल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 140/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-12-2007 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40011/17/98- आई आर (डीयू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 24th December , 2007 S.O. 110.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 140/99 ) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal-Cum Labour Court, No. II , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M.T.N.L. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 24-12-2007.

[No. L-4001 1 /17 /98 - IR(DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOURCOURT- II, NEW DELHI PRESIDING OFFICER : R. N. RAI .

I.D. No. 140/1999

In the Matter of:-

Shri Mahavir Singh & 2 others ,, R.K.Mishra, C/ o Shri B. B. Gupta, X-3A, CI Vilside, Tis Hazari Courts , Delhi - 110054.

VERSUS

TheChiefGeneral Manager , MTNL, Khursheed Lal Bhawan , Janpath, New Delhi - 110001 .

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L-40011 /17/ 98 - IR(DU) Central Governemnt Dt. 26-04-1999 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder :-

"Whether S/Sh. Mahavir Singh, Satbir Singh & R.K. Mishra , employed in MTNL as security guards

283

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

through a contractor have a claim for regularization of their services in view of their having engaged on employment which was a prohibited category under Section 10 ofCL ( R& A) Act , 1970. If so, from what date?"

Theworkman- applicant has filed claim statement . in the claim statement it has been stated that the above named applicants/workmen S/Shri Mahavir Singh, Shri Satbir Singh and Shri R. K. Mishra were working with the aforesaid management at its Divisional Office/Telephone Exchange (FRS), Hari Nagar, New Delhi . The details of the above named workmen are given as under:-

Post

Nameofthe workman

Date of Apptt .

Last Drawn

Guard 2800/- 10-10-95

15-03-97

2600/-

Guard

Sh. Mahavir Singh Sh. Satbir Singh

Sh . R.K. Mishra Guard 2800/- 15-05-95 That the workman Shri Mahavir Singh was appointed as Guard in the Telephone Exchange , Hari Nagar , w.e.f. 10-10-1995 vide office order No. Bl /HN/ 95-96/46 dated 10-10-1995 passed by SDE ( FRS), Delhi and likewise Shri R.K. Mishra was appointed as Guard w.e.f. 15-05-1995 vide officeorderNo. Β1 /HN /95-96/43 dated 15-5-1995 passed by SDE ( FRS) , Delhi .

That the applicants/ workmen are very honest and sincère persons and their work and conduct was quite satisfactory and they never gave any chance of any complaint to the Respondent/Management and their superior.

Thatthe Respondent/Management was not keeping the proper records of the workmen and was also not paying them the wages as fixed by the Delhi Administration and were also not providing other legal benefits and facilities during their service tenure such as weekly offs , festivals holidays , casual leave , earned leave , annunal increments , provident fund, uniform and bonus etc. etc. to which the applicants /workmen were legally entitled to and the workmen were made to serve continuously without any break.

That even the Management was paying the monthly wages to the workmen through cheques through some other agencieswhile the workmen were not in the knowledge of the particulars of the persons/ agencies through whom the wages was being paid to them by the Management as the officials ofthe Respondent/Management used to hand over the said cheque of monthly wages to the workmen directly by the said officials .

That as the workmen had completed 90 days continuously with the Management without any break at all , the workmen requested the Management to take them on permanent basis and to provide all the legal benefits and facilities of a permanent employee and also demanded the difference in the minimum wages and also the wages, in 284

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

lieu ofweekly offs , festivals holidays , carned leaves , annual increment, medical facility , uniform allowances and bonus etc. but the Management instead of providing all the said legal benefits to the workmen to which they were entitled tounder law, terminted the services of Shri Mahavir Singh on24-3-1998 and also terminated the services of Shri Satbir and Shri R.K Mishra on 18-2-1998 illegally, unlawfully and against the provisions of law and without issuing any show cause notice to the workmen and also without holding any enquiry against the workmen.

That the termination of the services of the workmen bytheManagement is absolutely wrong, illegal , unlawful , unjustified and in contravention of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act and the Management neither gave any notice nor any pay in lieu of the notice and as such the same amounts to unfair labour practice on the part ofthe Management.

That even otherwise the post of the guards on which the applicants were employed by the Management are still lying vacant and the Management has illegally , unlawfully and against the principle of natural justice and provisions oflaw have employed new persons juniors to the workmen onthe said posts, while the workmen are still unemployed despite their best efforts . The Management has filed written statement . In the written statement it has been stated that the present petition is misconceived and not maintainable .

That the reference is the result of non - application of mind andwithout taking into consideration the reply ofthe answering respondent as the alleged workmen were never directly employed by the answering respondent . It is submitted that there is no relationship of master and servant between the alleged workmen and the answering respondent . As such the whole proceedings are coram non-judice as held by the Hon'ble High Court in the case ofDTC Vs. Delhi Administration reported in 1973 (2) LLJ 306 and by Hon'ble Supreme Court in AIR 1974 SC2089 , as such the reference is liable to be rejected .

That the present dispute cannot be said to be an industrial dispute as it does not fall within the definition of Section 2( K)which defines the term industrial dispute under the said Act

Thatthe three alleged workmen were never employed by the respondent/ MTNL . In fact , as a matter of fact of public policy and pursuant to the instructions of the Govt . of India that the security persons in the public undertaking should be engaged through the Directorate General Resettlement , R.K. Puram , New Delhi which is an organization for re - settlement/rehabilitation of ex - armymen etc. keeping in view the said instructions the answering respondent approached the Directorate General Resettlement , R.K. Puram , New Delhi and it was through them that the alleged workmen were employed in terms the contract dated 25-3-95 on a consolidated remuneration ofRs . 3556 per month . The answering respondent were paying directly to the said agency (agency of Directorate

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] General of Resettlement) who in turn were paying to the alleged workmen through cheques and the alleged workmen were accepting the said payment without any protest or demur. As such there was no privity of contract or employment between the alleged workmen and theMTNL . It is further relevant to state that pursuant to the inspection of the Labour Enforcement Inspector the objections were taken that the alleged assignment though given through the Directorate General of Resettlement was violative of Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act through which fact was not agreed .

The answering respondent immediately disengaged the services of the said agency i.e. Directorate General of Resettlement . The present reference is liable to be rejected. That the present refrence is bad in law inasmuch as Directorate General Resettlement was the proper and necessary party and as such by not making them a party, the present reference is liable to be rejected on this sole ground.

Thatwithout prejudice to what is stated hereinabove it is submitted that in case the workmen were having any grievance regarding their non -employment it is with respect to the said agency nominee of Directorate General Resettlement and the said agency does not fall within the jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Tribunal as such also the present petition is liable to be dismissed.

It issubmitted that the alleged workmen were never employed by the answering respondent and of at all they had ever worked at Divisional Office /Telephone Exchange itwas never directly under the answering respondent and the alleged workmen are put to strict proof thereof.

The alleged workmen cannot take benefit of any communications which may have been wrongly addressed or written by any person working with the answering respondent . It is specifically denied that Shri Mahavir and Shri Mishra were appointed directly by the answering respondent. It is submitted that admittedly the answering respondent never paid any salary/wages to the alleged workmen as such there was no question of answering respondent employing the alleged workmen .

It is submitted that the answering respondents were not making any payment to the workmen and the answering respondents were bound by the terms and conditions of the agreement entered into between the answering respondent and the said agency. It is submitted that as the alleged workmen were never employed by the answering respondent there was no question of the answering respondent supervising the work of the alleged workmen or giving them any benefits as alleged or otherwise . It is submitted that the payments if any were being paid as per the agreement to the agency provided by the Directorate General of Resettlement and there was no relationship of employer and employee between the answering respondent . andthe alleged workmen and as such there was no question ofproviding any legal benefits as alleged or otherwise.

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

Theworkmen applicants have filed rejoinder . In their rejoinder they have reiterated the averments of their claim statement & have denied most of the paras of the written. statement . The management has aiso denied most of the paras of the claim statement .

Evidence of both the parties has been taken .

Heard arguments from both the sides & perused the papers on the record.

Ittranspires from perusal of the record that claim has beenfiledby Shri Mahavir Singh and Shri Satvir Singh but they have not filed affidavit . Only Shri R.K. Mishra has filed affidavit and is contesting the case .

It was submitted from the side of the workman that Shri R. K. Mishra was appointed as Guard w.e.f. 15-05-1995 vide office order dated 15-05-1995. He discharged his duties sincerely. The management was not keeping proper records of the workman . He was not paid the wages fixed by the Delhi Administration and several others legal benefits and facilities just as holidays , weekly off, increments etc. were not provided to the workman by the management . Payment to the wrkman was made through some agencies whereas the workman was directly engaged . He has performed 90 days of service without any break . He requested the management to take him on permanent basis and to provide him all the facilities . The management was annoyed and terminated the services of the workman on 18-02-1998 illegally, unlawfully and against the provisions of the law. The post is still lying vacant . The workman deserves reinstatement.

It was submitted from the side of the management that the applicant is not a workman under industrial dispute Act, 1947. It was further submitted that the workman was never employed by the management . He was engaged through the Director General , Re -settlement , R.K. Puram , New Delhi which is an organization for resettlement/ rehabilitation of the Ex . Army Men .

It was further submitted that the management approached the Director General of Re - settlement and through the Director the workman was employed as per the contract dated 25-03-1995 on the consolidated remuneration of Rs.3556/ - per month . The management made payment of the entire amount to the Director General of Re settlement and the workman received his wages from the Director General of Re - settlement . There is no cripty of contract of employment between the management and the workman.

The management has fild photocopyB - 60 to B61 . It is contract agreement between the Institute and the Director General ofRe -settlement and the management. It has been mentioned in this agreement that in case the performance of Security Guard is found un -satisfactory, the Institute shall be responsible for the replacement of the Guard . This document establishes the fact that there was contract between the Institute of Industrial management and the Security and the MTNL.

285

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

The management has filed document B - 62 to B 102. These documents relate to the payment made by MTNL to the Institute of Industrial Management and Security. Every time payment has been made over Rs.10, 000/- . These documents disclose that the Guards were engaged by IIMS and payment has been made directly to them . These payments have been made on the letter head. These documents are photocopy but the workman has not denied the same.

There are government orders from B - 55 to 57 which disclose that this system of taking Security Guards through IIMSwas stopped for the reasons of security. The workman was engaged by IIMS . He received payment through IIMS and IIMS was responsible for his satisfactory service . The workman was not directly engaged by the management .

Itisof course true that the workman has worked for 2 to 3 years as Security Guard in the MTNL but he was engaged by IIMS Institute of Security Guard and an agreement has been entered into between the IIMS and the MTNL. The workman is an employee of IIMS and when government directed the MTNL not to take Guards from IIMS the services of the workman have been terminated .

From the above it becomes quite obvious that there is no relation of employer and employee in view of section 2 (k) of the ID Act, 1947. This dispute is not between the employer and the employee . The dispute is not covered under Section 2 (k) of the ID Act, 1947 in view of 1973 (2) LLJ 306 and AIR 1974 SC 2089. The reference is liable to be rejected as there is no industrial dispute for want of relation ofmaster and servant . The workman is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for .

The reference is replied thus:

S/Sh. Mahavir Singh, Satbir Singh & R.K. Mishra , employed in MTNL as Security Guards though a contractor dos not have a claim for regularization of their services in view of their having been engaged on employment which was a prohibited category under section 10 of CL ( R & A) Act 1970. The workmen applicants are not entitled to get any relief as prayed for .

The award is given accordingly.

Date : 13-12-2007

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 24 दिसम्बर, 2007

का.आ. 111.-. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ऐयरोनाटिक्स क्वालिटी एश्यूरेंस के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 159/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-12-07 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-14012/3/98- आईआर( डीयू) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी 286

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008 /PAUSA 29, 1929

New Delhi , the 24th December, 2007 S.O. 111. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 159/98 ) Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court , Kanpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of AeronauticsQuality Assurance and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 24-12-2007 .

[No. L- 14012/3/ 98 - IR(DU) ]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI R G SHUKLA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, KANPUR Industrial Dispute No.159 of 98

In the matter of dispute between:

Ram Chandra son of Sri Jangali

106/371 HeeraGanj

Kanpur,

And

TheDirectorGeneral Aeronautics quality Assurance Kanpur.

AWARD

1. Central Government of India, MOL, New Delhi videNotification No.L - 14012 / 3 / 98 / 1R ( DU ) dated 11-8-98 has referred the following dispute for adjudication tothis tribunal:-

" Whether the action of the management of Director General Aeronautics Quality Assurance , Kanpur, in terminating the services ofthe workman Ram Chandra w.e.f. $ -2-97 is legal andjustified, Ifnot to what relief workman is entitled?

2. The claim ofthe workmen as set up by him in his staterhent of claim is that in order to keep the workmen from attaining the status of regular and permanent employee ofthe opposite party, they appointed him on 21-6-94 against regular and permanent post of class IV daily wages and not only it but his attendance also has been recorded incorrectly by the opposite party . The workman has worked more than 240 days in 12 calender month. The working hours ofthe workman were from 8.30 a.m. to 4.30 p.m. but the workman was required to work much more hours than the prescribed one . The workman further pleads that his work and conduct remained satisfactory during the period ofhisemployment i.e. 21-6-94 to 6-2-97 . The opposite party intentionally avoided to make payment of his wages at the prescribed minimum rate . Beside the above the opposite

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] party removed his services w.e.f. 6-2-97 in breach of provisions of Industrial disputes Act, 1947 which is against the principles of natural justice and as such is liable to be set aside holding that the workman is entitled for his reinstatement with full back wages continuity of service and other benefits attached with the post .

2. The opposite party has vehemently denied the claim of the workman on variety of grounds out of which main ground is that a daily rated employee has no right to claim regular or permanent status in public employment without undergoing through selection process prescribed under service rules . As such the claim of the workman is not maintainable .

3. Inrejoinder filed by the workmen nothing new has been mentioned except reiterating the pleadings already raised in the statement of claim .

4.Both contesting parties have adduced oral as well as documentary evidence in the form of photocopies. It is settled principle of law that photocopies of the documents cannot not read to be as admissible evidence in support of pleadings of a party. From this point of view photocopies of the documents filed by the contesting parties are being ignored by the tribunal .

5. In view of it now there remanis only oral eviedence ofthe workman which appears to be of no help to him as admitted according to his own case he was appointed on daily rate basis by the opposite party. Therefore , there appears no need to appreciate that evidence in the instant case.

6.Having regard to the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in leading case viz ( Himanshu Kumar Vidyarthi versus State of Bihar and another and Secretary state of Karnataka versus Smt. Uma Devi , the controversy as to whether a daily rated casual employee can be given benefit of regular and permanent employment in public employment has now been finally set at rest by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India by laying law that a daily rated worker casual worker temporary of adhoc worker appointed on a post falling under public employment either under the Government Central , state or public sector undertaking cannot claim regularization against such post unless he has undergone through selection process under prescribed service rule . If it is so Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Courts should not be allowed to be used as a measure for providing back door entry to such persons without adhering the prescribed selection process .

7. Therefore, in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, there remains hardly any need to discuss oral as well as documentary evidence of the contesting parties in as much as from the pleadings of the parties it is common ground that the workman was appointed as a daily rated employee without following the prescribed recruitment rules . Even otherwise the claim of the workmen appears to be barred by the provisions of [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

287

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT , JABALPUR

NO . CGIT/LC/R/128/2003

Presiding Officer : SHRI C.M. SINGH The Secretary,

Rashtriya Colliery Workers Federation, GM Complex, Branch, Johilla Area of SECL , PO: Nowrozabad,

Workman/Union Umaria(MP)

Industrial Disputes Act , 1947, as the provisions of the Act would not come into play automatically in the case of- the workmen in the absence ofthe pleadings by the workman to the effect that the opposite party have breached the provisions of service regulations applicable to him for the time being and the said breach of such provisions of services regulation is analagous to any of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, on the ground on which the action of the management has been assailed by the workmen before the Tribunal . A bare perusal of entire statement ofclaim would go to show that no such pleadings has been raised by him in the claim statement, therefore , the action of the opposite party cannot be construed to be a retrenchment as defined under the provision of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947, and when it is not a retrenchment, the workman cannot be given protection of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 .

Versus

TheGeneral Manager,

Johilla Area ofSECL,

PO: Nowrozabad,

Umaria(MP)

8. In any view of the matter the present case cannot be said to be a case of retrenchment or termination of the service under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , therefore , workman cannot be granted any relief as claimed by him in his statement of claims. The claim of the workman fails and it is held that he is not entitled for his reinstatement in the service of the opposite party together with benefits as claimed by him .

9. Reference is , therefore , answered against the workman and in favour of the opposite party.

R. G. SHUKLA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 26 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 112.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.ई.सी.एल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 128/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-12-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012 /389/2002- आईआर ( सी- II ) ]

अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 26th December , 2007 S.O. 112. In pursuancesuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 128/ 2003 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of S.E.C.L and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 26-12-2007 .

[No. L-22012/389/2002- IR(C- II) ]

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer 62G1/08-17

Management

AWARD

Passed on this 29th day of November, 2007 1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No.L- 22012/ 389 /2002 - IR(C - II ) dated 11-7-2003 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :-

"Whether the demand of Sh. K. B. Dwivedi , Machinist Category -V to promote him in the same capacity w.e.f. 01-01-97 i.e. the date when Sh . Manoj Tiwari was promoted is legal andjustified? Ifyes , to what relief he is entitled ?"

2. Vide order dated 26-10-2006 passed on the ordersheet of this reference proceeding the reference proceeded exparte against the workman .

3. The workman has not filed his statement ofclaim .

4.The management has filed their Written Statement. Their case in brief is as follows . Workman has claimed promotion from 1-1-97 whereas the dispute has been raised only in the year 2003. Hence the dispute is highly belated and therefore the same is not maintainble . That the promotion cannot be claimed as a matter of right as it is a managerial function . That the service conditions of the workman are governed by standing orders and the various settlements that have been arrived at between various Unions and the management from time to time and is generally known as NCWA . The said settlement carry Job Nomenclature , Cadre Scheme etc. Cadre Scheme has been formulated under NCWA for each category of workers giving the promotional channel , scale of pay, minimum qualification, eligibility for promotion and mode of promotion. Clause 3.5 of the Cadre Scheme which is relevant in this case is reproduced as under :-

"The promotional zone for filling the vacancy in Category- I to Category-VI will be Unit/Project . As regards 288

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JANUARY 19, 2008 /PAUSA 29, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 26th December, 2007 Technical and Supervisory Grade -C to A. Promotional zone would be area, unless otherwise specifically provided in the scheme itself

S.O. 113. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 70/95 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of S.E.C.L and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 26-12-2007 . ...

NoL- 22012/ 473 / 1994- IR (C- II ) ] 16 AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

PANINEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO . CGIT/LC/R/70/95

With referenceto the above promotions of machinist, Cat- IV and Cat-V were being done unitwise and subject to vacancy in theunit concem as per MP budget in accordance with the cadre scheme . Therefore no similarly situated employee of otherunit can be compared with the employee ofother units . Since the workman was posted in other unit during promotion of Shri Manoj Kumar to the post of machinist Cat - IV & Cat - V, he cannot be promoted either with or before Shri Manoj Kumar was promoted and therefore it is crystal clear that there is neither violation of cadre scheme nor any supersession as alleged . Now as the workman has already been promoted to the post of machinist Cat- V vide order dated 31-98/ 1-4-98 and to the post of machinist Cat- VI vide order dated 26-4-03, the reference becomes infructuous .

Presiding Officer: SHRI C.M. SINGH

The Vice President,

5. As the case proceeded exparte against the workmen , no evidence is on record for proving the case of theworkman.

National Colliery Workers Federation, Camp-72 , Transport Nagar , Korba, Post Korba Colliery, bd

Workman/Union

Distt . Bilaspur

Versus

6. The management in order to prove their case has filed affidavit of their witness Shri S.K. Bhargav, then working as Dy.CPM at Area Headquarter Colliery ofSECL , JohillaArea .

The General Manager ,

S.E.C.L , Gevra Project,

7.1 have heard Shri A.K. Shashi , Advocate , the learned counsel for the management. I have very carefully gone through the evidence on record

: Management

Post Gevra Project Distt.Bilaspur

AWARD

Passed on this 12th day of December 2007 8. The case of the management is fully established from theuncontroverted arid unchallenged affidavit oftheir witness Shri S.K. Bhargav . Therefore the reference deserves to be decided in favour of the management and against the workman without any orders as to costs.

1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No.L - 22012 / 473/94-1R ( C - 11 ) dated 2-5-95 has referred the following dispute för adjudication by this tribunal

9. In view of the above, the reference is decided in favour ofthe management and against the workman without any orders as to costs holding that the demand of Shri K.B. Dwivedi Machinist Category-V to promote him in the same capacityw.e.f. 01/01/97 i.e. the date when Sh. Manoj Tiwari waspromoted is not legal and justified, Consequently, the workman is not entitled to any reljef

MASINGH, Presiding Officer

"Whether the action of the management of SECL , Gevra Project in punishing Shri Sachish Kumar , Shovel Operator for damaging jeep & deducting Rs . 16,000 (500 equal monthly instalments from wages ) is justified? if not , to what relief is the workmen concerned entitled to ? "

नई दिल्ली, 26 दिसम्बर, 2007

2. Vide order dated 15-7-05 passed on the ordersheet of this reference proceeding , the reference proceeded exparte against workman. No statement of claim has been filed on behalf ofworkman.

का.आ. 113. औद्योगिक विवाद् अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.ई.सी.एल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 70/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-12-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-22012/473/1994- आईआर( सी-11) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

3. The management has filed their Written Statement . Their case in brief is as follows . That workman Shri Sachish Kumar was initially appointed as Driver (T) Cat - II on 14-2-91 at Gavera Project .He was subsequently transferred to Dipka Augmentation in the existing capacity w.e.f. 24-10-92. He was deputed on jeep No. MO141 on 30-10-91 toBilaspur along with Shri R. P. Singh , Executive Engineer (Ex.cav. ) to bring certain articles from M/ s . Allied Sales 289 [ भाग 11 खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

२६ भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19,2008/पौष, 29, 1929

New Delhi, the 26th December, 2007.

8.0.114.In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 59/92 ) Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Jabalpuras shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SEC. L. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 26-12-20079hes ) dut

[No.1/ 22012/482 / 1991 - IR (C- II)] ** AY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ơi chưa tình tuột lạANNEXURE od teost

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, Viisa tov ous Vlingat JABALPURZWEIL

NO.CGIT/LC/R / 59 /92Mpaz que mot boar১০ and Services, Bilaspur . While coming from Bilaspur due to negligence of Shri Sachish Kumar the driver, dashed the jeep with a tree near Pali, resulting injury to Shri R.P. Singh, Executive Engineer (Ex.cav. ) who was sitting in the jeep and the jeep was also badly damaged As soon as the message was received by the Gavera Project, Shri R.K Jaiswal SE(Ex.cav .) rushed to the place of accident along with the doctor in the ambulance. By that time , they found that Shri R.P. Singh the injured officer was taken by private jeep to the hospital As such the team returned back to Javera Hospital . Due to said gross negligence in dutyby the workman concerned,he was issued with a chargesheet under clause 26.5, 26.23 ofthe standing order applicable to him. As the reply was found unsatisfactory, adepartmental enquiry was held in the matter. As a consequence thereof, a lenient punishment of recovery of Rs. 16000 was impend on workman for the damages caused to the Goverument property.a pas legal sistemage on ! The Rodin

PRESIDINGOFFICER : SHRIC.M . SINGH

The General Secretary00-0 - no buopaimethansa ink M.P. K.K.M.P (HM Song

4. As the case proceeded exparte against the workman , no evidence has been adduced on behalf of workhan

Workman /Union

Junnardeoswn Distt, Chhindwara, 38-9-01

5. TheThe management inin order to prove theirtheir case , filed affidavit of their witness Shri T.K.Nag, then working as General Manager in Dipka Project of SECL

The General Manager88

6. 1 have heard Shri A.K.Shashi, Advocate for the management, I have very carefully gone through the entire evidence on record.teoremste linne fute sidst

WIC.L , Kanhan Area,

P.O Dungaria,

Distt. Chhindwara

Management

bon Passed on this 3rd day, of December 2007 7 The case of the management is fully established from the uncontroverted and unchallenged affidavit of their witness Shri T.K.Nag Therefore the reference deserves to be decided in favour of the management and against the workmari without any orders as to costs

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour,vide Its Notification No.L-220 12/482/91 +1R(C -II) dated26-3-92 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal: \

Whether the action ofthe management ofGhorawari Colliery ofW.C.Ltd. in dismissing from services to

s /shri Prem Syo Dhonda w.e.f. 16-3-90 , Madu S /o Kriya w.e.f. 7-9-90 and Kunnital S/o Hiralal w.e.f. 8-4-88 is legal and justified? Ifnot, towhat reliefthe disconcerned workmen are entitled to?

8. In view of the above , the reference is decided in favour of the management and against workman without any orders as to costs holding that the action of management of SECL, Gevra Project in punishing Shri Shri Sachis Kumar, Shovel Operator for dantaging jeep & deducting Rs . 16,000 ( 500. equal monthly instalments from wages) is justified and consequently the workman is not entitled to any reliefertation

GMA SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 26 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 114- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. ई. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 59/92 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जहै , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-12-07 को प्राप्त हुआ था OW & bgao ,knouanel a hotel

सं. एल-22012/482/1991 आईआर (सी- II ) ]

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

12- 2. The case of tof the workmen in brief is as follows . Shri Prem (now dead) was employed as General Mazdoor with the management. He was appointed on 10-12-80 . He was chargesheeted vide No.GHC/CS/ 2020 /88 dated 12-8-88 charging him that he was absenting from duty w.e.f. 27-5- 88. The charge sheet was not supplied to him . The workman was illegally stopped from duty without written notice or suspension. The socalled enquiry shown on the papers onlyconducted after aga gap of one year on 13-9-88 and after agap ofone year afone year again the next date was fixed after enquiry i.e. 69-89 which was only shown on the papers and the last date was shown as 23-10-89 of the socalled enquiry. The management had shown two thumb impressions on the enquiry proceedings , one of Prem ( now(now.dead) and the other 151 [PART II-SEC . 3 (11) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008 /PAUSA 29 , 1929

290

of Chhannoolal , co - worker . Both these persons were illiterate and innocent . Four Trade Unions are working -at Ghorawari Colliery and hundreds of workers ofthe Unions are all the times ready for co- worker's duty . Infact no enquirywas conducted by the management and the thumb impression of Shri Prem (now dead) is false on the enquiry record. The workman was dismissed w.e.f. 16-3-90 as a result ofthe socalled enquiry . Workman Shri Madu Adivasi, Tub Loader was appointed on 1-1-1974 . He was chargesheeted vide No. GHC/CS/ 1290/ 87 dated 15-11-87 charging him that he was absenting from duty from 10-8-87 to 24-11-87 . The chargesheet was not supplied to him . After 18 months from the date of chargesheet, the first date in the enquiry was shown on papers as 15-5-89 . Again after one year , the next date of enquiry was shown on papers as 20-5-90 .Workman Shri Madu was illegally and verbally stopped from duty since March 1990. He was enlisted for retrenchment . The Enquiry Officer gave enquiry report undated It was a bogus and false enquiry . The workman ShriMadu was dismissed on 7-9-90 . Thus the retrenchment of the workman is legal . Workman Kunnilal , Tub loader was appointed on 26-9-73. He was chargesheeted vide No.GHC/CS/2321 / 86 dated 30-9-86 . The chargesheet wa's not supplied to him . The charge against him was that he had been absent from 1-8-86. One more chargesheet has beenshown against him on papers i.e. GHC/CS/ 1379/87 dated 28 11-87 that he had been absenting from 14-8-87. He was suspended for unlimited period on papers w.e.f. 30-9-86 and was dismissed after a gap of 3 years . He was not paid suspension allowance to date . He was dismissed on 8-4-88 . This enquiry against him was also bogus and fabricated. It has been prayed on behalf of the workmen thatillegal order of the managementbe set - aside and the workmen be reinstated with all back wages and benefits .

action of the management in not continuing him in the service is legal and proper . Workman Madu was appointed as a Tub loader in Ghorawari in 1-1-1974 . He was also a habitual absentee and he was not attending to his duty properly. On account of his unauthorized absence from duty w.e.f. 10-8-87 a charge sheet dated 15-11-87 was issued to him by the Manager , Ghorawari Colliery . Shri Madu submitted reply to the aforesaid chargesheet denying the charges levelled against him . But the reply was not found satisfactory . Therefore a detailed enquiry was conducted into the charges levelled against him as per rules . Inspite of sufficient service of notice , workman Madu did not participate in the enquiry proceeding. After conducting a proper and legal enquiry, the Enquiry Officer came to the conclusion that the workmarn was guilty of the charges levelled against him . Keeping such an employee on the roll is not at all in the interest of management . As such the action of the management is legal and proper . Workman Sri Kunnilal was appointed in the Ghorawari Colliery w.e.f. 26-9-83 . He was also a habitual absentee . He was unauthorisely absent without any intimation or information w.e.f. 1-8-84 . He was continupusly absent for 2 years . His whereabouts were not known . As such a chargesheet dated 30-9-86 was issued to him for remaining absent for such a long time. A reply was submitted by the workman Shri Kunnilal . But the reply was not found satisfactory. Therefore a detailed enquiry into the charges levelled against Shri Kunnilal was conducted by the management . Since the workman failed to appear even after intimation of the date fixed in the enquiry , therefore the Enquiry Officer had no other option but to conduct an exparte enquiry . The Disciplinary Authority after considering the enquiry report took a proper action against workman because it was not in the interest ofmanagement to permit such worker to continue in the service of the Bank. It is prayed by the management that in view of the above , the workmen are not entitled to any relief.

4. On 18-7-95 , my learned predecessor in office framed following issues upon the pleadings of the parties :-

i. Whether the enquiry is just, proper & legal ?

ii . Whether the management is entitled to lead evidence before this tribunal?

iii . Whether the charges of misconduct are proved on the facts of the case ?

iv. Whether the punishment awarded is proper and legal?

V. Relief and costs ?

5.The management in order to prove that the enquiry was conducted against the workman justly, properly and legally examined their witness Shri S.K.Shrivastava, then posted as Personnel Manager in WCL, Kanhan Area .

6. The workman did not examine any witness for proving that the enquiry was not conducted against him properly and legally .

3. The management has filed their Written Statement . Their case in brief is as follows . Workman Shri Prem (now dead) was appointed as General Mazdoor on 10-12-80 . He was working in. Ghorawari Colliery . Ever since his appointment, it was observed that Shri Prem was in the babit of remaining absent unauthorisely . Because of his unauthorized absence from duty without any intimation. and sanction from competent authority w.e.f. 27-5-88 , a chargesheet dated 12-8-88 was issued to him by the Manager , Ghorawari Colliery. A chargesheet was issued to him on the address available with the management as per the service record of the workman . Inspite of issuance ofcharge sheet , the workman did not respond to the same and did not submit any reply to the chargesheet . As no replywas received , a departmental enquiry was conducted intothe charges levelled against him according to the rules . After a fair and proper enquiry , it was established that the workman was guilty of charges levelled against him and it wasproved beyond doubt that Shri Prem (now dead) was a habitual absentee and has committed serious acts of misconduct as alleged in the chargesheet . As such , the 291

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19, 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

FINDINGS

against the workmen without any orders as to costs holding that the action of the management of Ghorawari Colliery of W.C.Ltd . in dismissing from services to S/Shri Prem S/o Dhonda w.e.f. 16-3-90 , Madu S / o Kriya w.e.f. 7-9-90 and Kunnilal S /o Sh. Hiralal w.e.f. 8-4-88 is legal and justified and the workmen are , therefore , not entitled to any relief.

14. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment asper rules.

C.M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer 7. Issues No.1 & 2-My learned predecessor- in- office after having heard the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the evidence on record , gave findings on preliminary issues No.1&2 . It was held by him that the enquiry was properly conducted against the workmen and the management therefore is not required to lead any evidence in this case to prove the alleged misconduct of the workman and answered the preliminary issue No. 1 & 2 accordingly . The findings on Issue No.1 & 2shall form the part of this award.

नई दिल्ली, 26 दिसम्बर , 2007 8. Issue No. 3-In view of findings recorded by my learned predecessor on Issues No.1 & 2, it is hereby held that the charges of misconduct are proved on the facts of the case . Issue No.3 is decided accordingly .

9. Issues No.4 & 5-1 have heard Shri A.K.Shashi , Advocate for the management I could not have an opportunity ofhearing the learned counsel for the workmen as none appeared on behalf of the workmen.

का.आ. 115. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. ई. सी. एल . के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 62/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-12-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-22012/439/1994-आईआर( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 26th December, 2007

S.O. 115. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 62/95 ) CentralGovernment Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of S. E. C. L. and their workman , which was received by the Central Govemment on 26-12-2007 .

[No. L- 22012/439/ 1994- IR(C- II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/ 62/95 PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRI C. M. SINGH 10. Shri A.K.Shashi , Advocate learned counsel for the management submitted that appropriate punishment has been given to the workmen after having considered the acts of their misconduct . He prayed that this tribunal should not interfere with the punishment imposed on the workmen and in this respect, he placed his reliance on 1997 (2) L.L.N . 1019. SC in the case of State of Punjab and others versus Bakhshish Singh & 1998 ( 1 ) L.L.N.710 Madras High Court in the case of Anna Transport Corporation , Salem versus Labour Court, Salem and another . 1 have very carefully gone through the law cited by the learned counsel forthe management. It has been held therein that it is settled legal position that it is for the disciplinary authority to pass appropriate punishment ; the Civil Court cannot substitute its own view to that of the Disciplinary as well as the Appellate Authority on the nature of punishment to be imposed upon the delinquent officer . That in view of the findings ofthe Appellate Court , it is a grave misconduct, theAppellate Court ought not to have interfered with the decree of the trial court . That the High Court dismissed it without application of mind and ignoring the settled legal principle.

Workman/Union 11. It has also been held by the Hon'ble High Court ofMadras that the discretion under Sec - ll A of the I.D. Act is not meant to be equated to charity.

TheSecretary, M.P.K.K.M.U , Post Sonawani Colliery, Distt. Surguja

Versus

Management

The Sub Area Manager , DumanHill Colliery , SECL, Post Sonawani Colliery, Distt. Surguja

AWARD

Passed on this 14th day of December , 2007 12. In view of the law cited above and considering the misconduct of the workmen , I am of the considered opinion that the management has properly punished them and they are not entitled to any relief. But because of, one of the workmen has died and the other two have been terminated from services , it shall be just and proper that the parties should be directed to bear their own costs of thisproceeding . Issues No.4 & 5 are decided accordingly .

1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No.L- 22012(439)/94-IR.C-II dated 24-3-95 13. In view of the findings on Issues No. 1 to 5, the reference is decided in favour of the management and [PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 292

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008 /PAUSA 29 , 1929

has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:

8. In view of the above, the reference is decided in favour ofthe management and against the workman without any orders as to costs holding that the action of Sub Area Manager, Duman Hill Colliery of Chitimiri Area of SECL in penalising Shri Bishram S/o Jaidha, Trammer Cat III vide order dated 19-7-93 and demoting him from Cat. I to Cat III is legal and justified. Consequently the workman is not entitled to any relief.

"Whether the action of Sub Area Manager , Duman Hill Colliery of Chirimiri Area of SECL in penalising Shri Bishram S/o Jaidha, Trammer Cat III vide order dated19-7-93 anddemoting him from Cat I to Cat III is legal and justified? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled to? "

9 Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment asper rules .

2.Vide orderdated 16-3-05 passed on the ordersheet ofthis reference proceeding , the reference proceeded exparte against workman Shri Bishram . No.statement of claim has been filed on behalf ofthe workmam

C. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 26 दिसम्बर, 2007

का.आ. 116. औद्योगिक विवाद, अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एस, ई. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विषाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 63/95) कोप्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-12-07 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-22012/442/ 1994 - आईआर( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 26th December , 2007

S.O.116 In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), of the Central Government hereby publishes the Arward (Ref. No. 63/95) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of S. E. G. L. and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 26-12-2007, 3.The management has filed Written Statement. Their case in brief is as follows . That the workman was initially appointed as General Mazdoor . He was given promotion from timeto time . He was working as Trammer Cat - III at the relevant period . The employees working in the coal industries have been provided with various facilities , such as free accommodation, free fuel , free medical aid etc. Providing residential accommodation is not a service condition of the employees working in the coal industry. The workman unauthorisedly without there being any allotment had encroached and occupied miners quarter Block No. 79, Quarter No.2 (14.Block ) , which was allotted to one Shri Bandel Sai , Dresser Duman Hill Colliery. On receipt ofthe report from the Security Personnel , the , workman was issued with a chargesheet under clause 26.14 of the StandingOrders applicable to him, The reply submitted by the workman was not found satisfactory. Therefore a departmental enquiry was conducted against him into the charges . The enquiry was conducted legally and properly. The Enquiry Officer held that the charges were proved against the workman, The Disciplinary Authority vide order dated 19-7-93 imposed the following punishment on the workman

Suspension period from 28-05-1993 to till date (19-7-93 ) is confirmed,

[No.L- 22012/442/ 1994- IR( C- II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

ii . He was de -graded to Cat- I mazdoor.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

#. As the case proceeded exparte against the workman , no evidence is on record on behalf of the workman.

NO . CGIT/LC/R/63/95

PRESIDING OFFICER : SHRI C. M. SINGH

5. The management filed affidavit of their witness Shri N.R.Das, then working as Personnel Manager at Duman HillColliery, SECL, Chirimiri area for proving their case .

6. I have heard Shri A.K.Shashi , Advocate for the management. I have gone through the evidence on record.

is om hul.Workmen/Union

The Secretary, K.K.S.S. (B.M.S ) , tr Qr.No. B /48 , Govinda, 1 Post Kotma Colliery Distt. Shahdol

Versus

The General Manager , Jamuna & Kotma Area, SECL , Post Jamuna Colliery, Distt. Shahdol ?

Management 7. The case of the management is fully established and proved from the uncontroverted and unchallenged affidavit of their witness, Shri N.R.Das . Therefore the reference deserves to be decided in favour of the management and against the workman without any orders asto costs .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

293

भारत का राजपत्र : जत्वरी 19, 2008/पौत्र 29,1929

AWARD

Passed on this 12th day of December , 2007

of the workmen is not at all proyed. The case of the management is fully established from the uncontroverted and unchallenged affidavit of management's witness Shri R.C.Yadav. The referanee, therefore, deserves to be decided in favour of the management and against the workmen/ Union without any orders as to costs ( ) 1. The Government of India , Ministry ofLabour vide its Notification No.L- 22012 (442 )/94 - IR(C- 11) dated 24-3-95 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal: की

Whether the action of General Manager, SECL Jamuna & Kotma Area in superçeding S/Sh. Mahd Yusuf Sheikh , R.S.Sahu, Gopal Singh, Dayaram Soni & S.M. Srivastava overmen of Govinda colliery by promoting Shri M.Kumar overmen to thethe post of St.overman vide order dated 4-4-91 is legal and justified? Ifnot, to what relief the workmer concerned Fare entitled to? " .

8. In view of the above, the reference is decided in favour ofthe management and against the workmen/Union without any orders as to costs holding that the action of General Manager, SECE Jamuna & Kottma Area in superceding S /Sh.Mohd Yusuf Sheikh , RS Sahu, Gopal Singh, Dayaram Soni & S.M, Srivastava overmen of Govinda colliery by promoting Shri M.Kumaroverman to the post ofSr. overman vide order dated 4-4-91 is legal andjustified and corisequently the workmen are not entitled to any relief.

9. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as Perrules, broju ve suntdow Bolivia

Law gave C. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2007 .

2. Vide order dated 3-1-06 passed on the ordersheet of this reference proceeding , the reference proceeded exparte against the workmen/Union . No statement ofclaim has been filed on behalf ofworkmen/Union . It appears that on behalf ofworkmen /Union, an application dated 11-9-95 has been filed by which certain copies of the paper have been brought on record forms is the fing for

3 The management filed their Written Statement .

का. आ. 117 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 की धारा 17 के अनुसरमा में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट, औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक, अधिकरप्प/ श्रम न्यायालय जोधपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-12-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था

חמישי THR [सं. एल -40012/67/2004- आई आर( डी यू( [

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi, the 27th December , 2007

চাল SIO . 117. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Industrial Tribunal Labour Court, Jodhpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the managentent of Department of Telecom and their workman , which was received by the Central Government Fon27-12-2007

[No : 1-40012/67/2004- IR(DU) ]

free, fear at fyn SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer Their case in brief is as follows. That the workmen Sarya Shri Mohd Yusuf Sheikh , R.S.Sahu , Gopal Singh , Dayaram Soni & S.M. Srivastava were employed as overmen, T &S,Gr.B in Sub area Jamuna & Kotma ofthe management. It has been pleaded in the Written Statement that the case ofthewokmen is that they are senior to Shri M.Kumar who has been promoted to the post of Sr overman and therefore the order of supersession dated 4-4-91 of thehe management isnot legal andand justified. It has been further pleaded by the management that the promotion to the post of Sf overmän is done as per the cadre scheme That the cases of the eligible candidates were considered for promotion to the post of Sr. overman taking into account their merit by the Departmental Promotion Committee wherein the case of workmen was also considered along with several candidates . That the merit of each of the candidate was: considered by the DPC: The DPC had made a report thereof. The promotion of Shri M.Kumar has been done on the principle ofMerit - cum - seniority as per recommendation of DPC . Hence Shri M.Kumar was promoted to the post of Sr.overman and the workmen could not be promoted.

औद्योगिक विवाद अधिकरण एंव श्रम न्यायालय जोधपुर पीठासीन अधिकारी:- श्री पुष्पेन्द्रसिंह हाड़ा और एच. जे. एस.

4. As the case proceeded exparte against the workmen Union , no evidence has been brought on record on behalfof workmen/Union

औद्योगिक बिबाद संख्याः 2/2005

श्री राजेन्द्र प्रसाद जावा पुत्र श्री संतोकलाल जी जावा जाति मेहत्तर निवासी, काजीपुरा मोहल्ला, हरिजन' बस्ती मारवाड़ जंक्शन , जिला 5. Themanagement in order to prove their case filed affidavit of their witness Shri R.G. Yadav, then working as AreaPersonnel Manager in Jamuna & Kotma area of SECL .

6.I have heard, Shri A.K.Shashi, Advocate for the management . I havehave very carefully gone though the évidence ownown record

1. सब डिवीजनल ऑफिसर तार सुमेरपुर, जिला पाली

2. महाप्रबन्धक दूर संचार जिला पाली, मारवाड़।

7. As there is neither any statement ofofclaim of the workmen/Union nor any evidence on their behalf, the case 294

[PART II-SÉC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

रेफरेन्स अन्तर्गत धारा 10 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947

उपस्थितिः-

(1 ) श्री डी. के चौहान , प्रतिनिधि प्रार्थी उप.

(2 ) श्री वासुदेव व्यास , प्रतिनिधि अप्रार्थी उप.

अवार्ड

दिनांक: 27-9-2007

1. भारत सरकार ने अपनी अधिसूचना क्रमॉक एल. 40012/67/2004-(आई. आर (डीयू) दिनांक 4-11-2004 के तहत निम्न विवाद अन्तगर्त धारा 10 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 इस न्यायालय को रेफर किया है :-

"Whether the action of the management of S.D.O. (Tar), Sumerpur O / o- The General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. , Pali , Marwar in terminating the services of their workman Shri Rajinder Prasad Jawa S/o Shri Santok Lal Jawa, Part Times Sweeper w.e.f. 1-4-1997 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled?"

3. अप्रार्थी की ओर से जवाब में कहा गया है कि प्रार्थी को पूर्णतया अस्थाई तौर पर आकस्मिक मजदूर के रूप में पार्ट टाईम दो घण्टे प्रतिदिन के लिए सफाई कार्य करने हेतु 30-3-88 को तारघर सुमेरपुर में रखा गया था । प्रार्थी को कभी भी श्रमिक के रूप में अप्रार्थीगण ने नियुक्ति नहीं दी । यह गलत है कि प्रार्थी ने अप्रार्थी सं. 1 के अधीन 30-3-88 से 1-4-97 तक बिना किसी ब्रेक के कार्य किया हो, यह भी गलत है कि उसे प्रतिमाह 500/- रूपये वेतन दिया जा रहा हो , वास्तव में उसे तारघर सुमेरपुर में सफाई का कार्य हेतु प्रतिदिन दो घण्टे के लिए अंशकालीन आकस्मिक मजदूर के रूप में पूर्णतया अस्थाई तौर पर रखा गया था , जब- जब सफाई के कार्य की आवश्यकता होती थी तब - तब प्रार्थी से सफाई का कार्य करवाया जाता था, 31-12-1990 से 30-6-1991 के पत्र के जरिये प्रार्थी की सेवाओं की आवश्यकता नहीं होने के कारण प्रार्थी को काम पर नहीं आने हेतु सूचित किया गया था तथा उसके पश्चात् कार्य की आवश्यकता होने पर प्रार्थी को पुनः कार्य पर सुखा गया था । प्रार्थी द्वारा किये जाने वाले कार्य की प्रकृति को देखते हुए यह नहीं माना जा सकता कि प्रार्थी ने एक कलेण्डर वर्ष में 240 दिनों से अधिक अवधि तक काम किया हो । प्रार्थी का यह कथन भी गलते है कि उसने 30-3-88 से 1-4-97 तक अप्रार्थीगण के अधीन सफाई कर्मी एंव चौकीदार के पद पर कार्य किया हो । वास्तव में प्रार्थी से 1-6-89 से 8-6-89 तक कुल आठ दिनों की अवधि के लिए प्रति दिन पांच घण्टे के लिए चौकीदारी का कार्य करवाया गया जिसका भुगतान उसे किया गया, प्रार्थी को कभी भी चौकीदार के पद पर नियुक्ति नहीं दी गई । प्रार्थी द्वारा किये जाने वालें कार्य की प्रकृति के अनुसार तथाकथित सेवामुक्ति छंटनी की तारीफ में नहीं आती है न ही प्रार्थी के मामले में आई.डी. एक्ट के प्रावधान लागू होते हैं । अप्रार्थीगण द्वारा प्रार्थी को कभी भी सेवा में पुर्नस्थापित करने कोई आश्वासन नहीं दिया गया प्रार्थी ने कोई लिखित प्रार्थना- पत्र प्रस्तुत नहीं किये । प्रार्थी ने 27-3-2003 को प्रार्थना - पत्र प्रस्तुत कर नियमित नियुक्ति देने की प्रार्थना की थी किन्तु प्रार्थी को नियमानुसार नियमित नियुक्ति नहीं दी जा सकती थी क्योंकि प्रार्थी 1-4-97 के बाद कार्य पर नहीं आया । आकस्मिक मजदूर के रूप में कार्य करने वाले व्यक्ति के संबंध में वरिष्ठता सूची बनाने अथवा प्रकाशन करने की आवश्यकता नहीं रहती । अतिरिक्त कथन में कहा गया है कि भारत संचार निगमः का गठन वर्ष 2000 में हुआ अतः तथाकथित रूप से 1-4-97 को प्रार्थी को सेवा से पृथक करने की तारीख को भारत संचार निगम अस्तित्व में नहीं था । सब डिवीजनल ऑफिसर एवं महाप्रबन्धक नियोक्ता की परिभाषा में नहीं आते । नियमों के अन्तर्गत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के अनुरूप ही किसी व्यक्तिको सफाई कर्मचारी अथवा अन्य किसी पद पर नियुक्ति दी जा सकती है । प्रार्थी ने अपना विवाद अत्यन्त विलम्ब से उठाया है । अतः प्रार्थी किसी अनुतोष का अधिकारी नहीं है । प्रार्थी का मॉग - पत्र सव्यय खारिज किया जाये ।

4. मांग- पत्र के समर्थन में प्रार्थी ने स्वयं का शपथ-पत्र प्रस्तुत किया जिस पर अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि द्वारा जिरह की गई तथा अप्रार्थी की ओर से बस्तीमल परिहार व शम्भूसिंह पेमावत के शपथ - पत्र प्रस्तुत किये गये जिन पर प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि द्वारा जिरह की गई । 2. प्राथी ने अपना मांग- पत्र इस आशय का प्रस्तुत किया है कि प्रार्थी की नियुक्ति अप्रार्थी संख्या 1 ने फरास व सफाई वाले के पद पर दिनांक 23-5-88 को अस्थाई तौर पर की प्रार्थी ने अप्रार्थी सं. 1 के पास दिंनाक 30-3-88 से 1-4-97 तक बिना किसी ब्रेक के प्रत्येक कलेण्डर वर्ष में 240 दिन से अधिक काम किया तथा प्रार्थी को प्रतिमाह 500/- रूपये वेतन दिया जाता था । प्रार्थी से 30-3-88 से 31-5-89 तक फरास/ सफाई वाले का कार्य लिया गया तत्पश्चात् प्रार्थी को उपरोक्त कार्य के अतिरिक्त दिनांक 1-6-89 से कार्यालय में रात्रीकालीन चौकीदार के पद पर भी लगाया गया । इस प्रकार प्रार्थी ने 30-3-88 से-1-4-97 तक लगातार सफाईकर्मी एंव चौकीदार का कार्य किया । दिनांक 1-4-97 को अप्रार्थी सं. 1 ने बिना कोई कारण बताये मौखिक आदेश से प्रार्थी की सेवाएँ समाप्त कर दी , सेवा समाप्ति से पूर्व प्रार्थी को न तो नोटिस दिया न ही नोटिस के एवज में वेतन दिया न ही छंटनी मुआवजा दिया गया । प्रार्थी ने पुनः सेवा में लेने हेतु 29-1-98 तथा 20-2-2000 को अप्रार्थीगण को लिखित में भी प्रार्थना- पन्न दिये लेकिन अप्रार्थीगण द्वारा प्रार्थी को मात्र आश्वासन दिये जाते रहे लेकिन सेवा में पुर्नस्थापित नहीं किया गया । तत्पश्चात् प्रार्थी की पत्नी को मिरगी के दौरे पड़ने शुरू हो गये तथा प्रार्थी अपनी पत्नी के ईलाज में व्यस्त रहा व स्वंय प्रार्थी की मानसिक स्थिति पत्नी कीबिमारी के कारण खराब हो गई । प्रार्थी की पत्नी का ईलाज तीन वर्ष तक चला तब प्रार्थी ने पुनः अप्रार्थी विभाग में जाकर नौकरी हेतु निवेदन किया तथा 27-3-2003 को पुनः प्रार्थाना- पत्र दिया लेकिन अप्रार्थीगण से कोई जवाब नहीं दिया । अप्रार्थी द्वारा प्रार्थी को सेवामुक्त करने से पूर्व कोई वरिष्ठता सूची प्रकाशित नहीं की गई । प्रार्थी कम पढ़ा-लिखा होने के कारण व अपनी पत्नी की बिमारी के कारण व कानून से अनभिज्ञ होने के कारण पूर्व में शिकायत प्रस्तुत नहीं कर सका । अतः प्रार्थी को सेवा समाप्ति की दिनांक से सेवा में बहाल किये जाने तक सेवाऐं लगातार मानी जावे तथा प्रार्थी को समस्तअनुलाभ अप्रार्थीगण से दिलाये जावें । [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

5. दोनों पक्षों के प्रतिनिधीगण की बहस सुनी गई । पत्रावली का अवलोकन किया गया ।

295

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

8. उक्त विवेचन के अनुसार इस रेफरेन्स का उत्तर इस अवार्ड की टर्म्स में निम्न प्रकार दिया जाता है ।

9. प्रार्थी को दिनांक 1-4-1997 से अप्रार्थी द्वारा सेवामुक्त किया जाना अनुचित एवं अवैध नहीं था । प्रार्थी किसी अनुतोष का अधिकारी नहीं होगा ।

10. यह अवार्ड आज दिनांक 27-9-2007 को खुले न्यायालय मेंसुनाया गया ।

पुष्पेन्द्र सिंह हाड़ा, न्यायाधीश नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 118,औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग . के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जोधपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-12-07 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-40011/21/2001- आई आर ( डी यू) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 27th December , 2007 S.O. 118. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court , Jodhpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers inrelation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 27-12-2007 .

[No. L-40011/21 /2001 - IR(DU) ]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

अनुबन्ध

औद्योगिक विवाद अधिकरण एंव श्रम न्यायालय , जोधपुर पीठासीन अधिकारी: - श्री पुष्पेन्द्रसिंह हाड़ा आर. एच. जे. एस.

ओद्यौगिक विवाद संख्या-01 /2002

6. यह सिद्ध करने का भार प्रार्थी पर था कि उसने सेवामुक्ति की रेफरेन्स में बताई दिनांक1-4-1997 से पूर्व के एक वर्ष में 240 दिन अप्रार्थी के अधीन कार्य किया (2006) 3 एल.एल.जे. 320 1 . प्रार्थी ने इस तथ्य को सिद्ध करने के लिए स्वंय की मौखिक साक्ष्य के अलावा प्रदर्श ए- पत्र दिनांक 1-6-89 प्रस्तुत किया है जिसमें प्रार्थी को रात्रि में ऑफिस में किसी भी व्यक्ति को नहीं सोने देने की हिदायत दी गई है । माननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय द्वारा (2006 ) 1 एल. जे. 268 में यह निर्णित किया गया है कि इस तथ्य को सिर्फ शपथ- पत्र के आधार पर सिद्ध होना नहीं माना जा सकता बल्कि इस सम्बन्ध में आवश्यक दस्तावेजी साक्ष्य भी प्रस्तुत की जानी चाहिये । प्रार्थी द्वारा उक्त पत्र के अलावा इस संबंध में कोई दस्तावेजी साक्ष्य न तो प्रस्तुत की गई है न ही तलब करवाई गई है । जब कि प्रार्थी इस तथ्य को उपस्थिति रजिस्टर अथवा वेतन भुगतान रजिस्टर से सिद्ध कर सकता था । प्रार्थी की साक्ष्य के रिबटल में अप्रार्थी विभाग की ओर से जो साक्ष्य प्रस्तुत की गई है उसमें श्री बस्तीमल. परिहार सीनीयर टेलीफोन ऑपरेटिंग एसिटेन्ट ने अपनी साक्ष्य में इस तथ्य को तो स्वीकार किया है कि प्रार्थी को 30-3-88 से प्रतिदिन दो घण्टे सफाई कार्य के लिए अंशकालीन मजदूर के रूप में रखा गया था । प्रार्थी को कोई नियुक्ति नहीं दी गई थी, उसे प्रति घण्टा के हिसाब से पाक्षिक रूप से भुगतान किया जाता था । प्रार्थी ने 30-3-88 से 1-4-97 तक लगातार सफाई कर्मचारी या चौकीदार का कार्य नहीं किया, इस दौरान 1-6-89 से 8-6-89 तक कुल 8 दिन ही प्रतिदिन पांच घण्टे चौकीदारी का कार्य प्रार्थी से लिया गया । जिरह में इस गवाह ने यह स्वीकर किया है कि राजेन्द्र प्रसाद जावा ने 1-4-97 तक कार्य किया परन्तु इसका आशय यह नहीं लिया जा सकता कि प्रार्थी ने 30-3-88 से 1-4-97 तक लगातार कार्य किया हो । चूंकि इस गवाह ने स्पष्ट रूप से वह दिनांक बताई है जब उसने पांच घण्टे कार्य किया व शेष समय में दो घण्टे सफाई कार्य प्रार्थी द्वारा किया जाना बताया व यह भी कहा है कि 30-3-88 से 1-4-97 तक ऐसे पद पर कार्य नहीं किया । इस प्रकार प्रार्थी ऐसी कोई साक्ष्य प्रस्तुत नहीं कर पाया है जिसके आधार पर यह तथ्य सिद्ध होना माना जा सके कि सेवामुक्ति की रेफरेन्स में बताई गई दिनांक 1-4-97 से पूर्व के एक वर्ष में प्रार्थी ने अप्रार्थी विभाग में 240 दिन कार्य किया हो । श्री उम्मेदाराम पुत्र श्री कीरताराम द्वारा अखिल भारतीय तार परियात कर्मचारी संघ , 516 , सुभष नगर ' ए' पाली ( राज. )

बनाम

प्रबन्धक , दूर संचार जिला पाली ( राज. )

………………अप्रार्थी रेफरेन्स अन्तगर्त धारा 10 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम ,

1947

उपस्थिति:-

प्रतिनिधी प्रार्थी ( 1) श्री भागीरथ चन्दौरा

प्रतिनिधी अप्रार्थी (2) श्री बी.पी. बोहरा

7. प्रार्थी स्वीकारतः दैनिक वेतन भोगी कर्मचारी था व माननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय द्वारा 2005 ( 8 ) एस.सी.सी. 750 में यह निर्णित किया गया है कि दैनिक वेतन भोगी कर्मचारियों के लिए सीनीयोरिटी लिस्ट रखा जाना आवश्यक नहीं है । प्रार्थी का केस मुख्यतया धारा 25- एफ आई.डी. एक्ट , 1947 के उल्लंघन पर आधारित है । प्रार्थी ने धारा 25 - जी व 25 - एच आई.डी एक्ट, 1947 के उल्लंघन के कोई तथ्य नहीं बताये हैं । अतः इनका उल्लंघन अप्रार्थी विभाग द्वारा किया जाना नहीं माना जा सकता । इस प्रकार 240 दिन की सेवा प्रार्थी द्वारा पूरी किये जाने का तथ्य सिद्ध नहीं होने से धारा 25 - एफ आई.डी. एक्ट, 1947 का उल्लंघन अप्रार्थी विभाग द्वारा किया गया हो , यह सिद्ध होना नहीं माना जा सकता । इन परिस्थितियों में प्रार्थी की सेवामुक्तिअनुचित या अवैध नहीं माना जा सकती ।

62GI/08-18 296

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] अवार्ड दिनांक 30-8-2007

ओर से राजवीर सिंह का शपथ - पत्र प्रस्तुत किया गया जिस पर प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधी द्वारा जिरह की गई ।

5. दोनों पक्षों के प्रतिनिधीगण की बहस सुनी गई । पत्रावली का अवलोकन किया गया ।

1. भारत सरकार ने अपनी अधिसूचना क्रमांक एल. 40011/21/2001- आई आर ( डीयू) दिनांक 1-11-2001 द्वारा निम्नविवाद अन्र्तगत धारा 10 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 के तहत इस न्यायालय को रेफर किया है:-

Whether the action of General Manager, Telecom Distt. Pali Marwar in not giving overtime wages to Sh . Umedaram S/ o Sh . Kirtaman , Watchman for 12 hoursdutyfor every day w.e.f. 3-10-1987 to till date is legal and justified? If not, what relief the union concern to is entitled to ?

6. प्रार्थी ने यद्यपि अपने मांग पत्र में जिस अवधि का ओवरटाईम उसके द्वारा क्लेम किया गया है उसका विवरण मांग - पत्र के साथ परिशिष्ट में संलग्न करना बताया है परन्तु इस प्रकार का कोई परिशिष्ट मांग - पत्र के साथ या बाद में भी प्रस्तुत नहीं किया गया है । प्रार्थी ने अपनी साक्ष्य में यह कहा है कि दिनांक 3-10-87 को वह अप्रार्थी विभाग में चौकीदार के पद पर कार्यरत है मेरे से 12 घण्टे प्रतिदिन कार्य लिया गया जब कि मेरी ड्यूटी घण्टे प्रतिदिन निर्धारित थी । मैंने ज्यादातर चौकीदारी का कार्य किया है व तारघर का परिसर खुला था उक्त तारघर परिसर के चारों तरफ 2-3 फुट की दीवार थी , जेनरेटर , घड़ियाँ, लॉकर बाहर खुले में रहते थे जहां पर स्टोर , केश जनरेटर का इंजन अन्य सामान रहता था , रात को 12 बजे तक ऑफिस खुला रहता था , मेरे पास कैश की चाबी रहती थी , प्रतिदिन कैशियर से चार्ज लेना व देना होता था । अप्रार्थी को दिये गये विवरण के अनुसार 1,60,620 रुपये उसे ओवरटाईम के दिलवाये जावे । जिरह में इस गवाह ने कहा है कि पूरे बिल्डिंग की चौकीदारी मैं अकेले ही करता था । मैं कैशियर से रात को 12 बजे चार्ज लेता था , सुबह 8 बजे वापस दे देता था ।

2. प्रार्थी ने अपना मांग -पत्र इस आशय का प्रस्तुत किया है कि प्रार्थी उम्मेदाराम चौकीदार के रूप में अप्रार्थी संस्थान में दिनांक 3-10-8 से निरन्तर कार्यरत रहा, प्रार्थी से प्रतिदिन 12 घण्टे कार्य लिया गया जब कि प्रार्थी की ड्यूटी 8 घण्टे प्रतिदिन निर्धारित है , ब्रार्थी ने मई, 1999 से अप्रैल , 2000 की अवधि में जोधपुर में ऑफिस में कार्य किया जहां उससे कोई अधिसमय कार्य नहीं लिया गया, वर्तमान में प्रार्थी पाली में अंप्रार्थी के अधीन ड्राईविंग का कार्य कर रहा है । प्रार्थी ने अधिसमय कार्य के वेतन की राशि अप्रार्थीगण से मांगी लेकिन उसे अदा नहीं की गई जिसके कारण यह औद्योगिक विवाद् उत्पन्न हुआ । प्रार्थी के समान अन्य व्यक्तियों द्वारा कार्य करने पर उन्हें अधिसमय वेतन दिया जाता रहा है । अप्रार्थी द्वारा प्रार्थी को यह कहते हुए अधिसमय कार्य का भुगतान नहीं किया कि प्रार्थी की ड्यूटी 12 घण्टे की है जबकि प्रार्थी के स्थान पर अन्य व्यक्ति के कार्य करने की ड्यूटी 8 घण्टे की है जो अधिनियम के प्रावधानों के विपरीत है । अप्रार्थी संस्थान पर औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम के प्रावधान लागू होते हैं जिसके अनुसार अप्रार्थी किसी भी श्रमिक से प्रति सप्ताह 48 घण्टेसे अधिक कार्य लेने पर अधिसमय वेतन देय होता है । प्रार्थी अल्पवेतन भोगी कर्मचारी है उसकी उक्त राशि अप्रार्थी ने अदा नहीं कर श्रम विरोधी कार्यवाही की है । प्रार्थी तारघर में कार्य करता है जो रात्रि में 12 बजे तक खुला रहता है । इस प्रकार प्रार्थी अधिसमय के वेतन की राशि रुपये 1,60,62 व उक्त राशि पर 12 प्रतिशत ब्याज की राशि की मांग करता है , जो राशि प्रार्थी को अप्रार्थी से दिलाई जावे ।

7. अप्रार्थी की ओर से जो शपथ - पत्र प्रस्तुत हुआ है उसमें श्री राजवीर सिंह एस.डी.ई ( एच.आर.बी. ) जी.एम.टी.डी. ने अपनी साक्ष्य में यह कहा है कि प्रार्थी को वेतन उसके द्वारा किये गये कार्य के अनुरूप दिया गया है । प्रार्थी चौकीदार के पद पर था व रात्रिकालीन चौकीदार तारघर का कार्यकाल विभागीय नियमानुसार 12 घण्टे होने के कारण उसने अधिसमय कार्य नहीं किया है । विभागीय परिपत्र संख्या 24-11/82 टी. ई-11 दिनांक 8-11-83 परिपत्र संख्या 24-17 /71 टी.ई/ पी.ई -1 दिनांक फरवरी , 1972 एवं परिपत्र संख्या ई एस.टी/ 10-/ XXXXV II दिनांक , 24-1-1979 व परिपत्र सं. 24-11 /टी. ई. - 11 दिनांक 18-6-83 से स्पष्ट है कि जहाँ पब्लिक ट्रांजिक्सन नहीं होता एवं रात्रि में ताला लगा रहता है वहाँ चौकीदार का कार्यकाल 12 घण्टे तय किया गया है । तारघर रात्रि में दस बजे बंद हो जाता है एवं अगले दिन प्रातः सात बजे खुलता है , ऐसा तारघरों में चौकीदार का कार्यकाल 12 घण्टे ही निश्चित् किया गया है जब प्रार्थी उम्मेदराम छुट्टी पर रहता है तो इसके स्थान पर दूसरे कर्मचारी को वैकल्पिक व्यवस्था के बतौर लगाया जाता था जो कि चौकीदार पद का न होकर किसी अन्य पद का उम्मीदवार होता था जिससे विभाग कोनियमानुसार 8 घण्टे ही कार्य लिया जा सकता है । 3. अप्रार्थी की ओर से जवाब में कहा गया है कि प्रार्थी, अप्रार्थी विभाग में 3-10-87 से कार्यरत है परन्तु उससे न तो कभी अधिसमय कार्य लिया गया न ही प्रार्थी ने अधिसमय कार्य किया , प्रार्थी से विभागीय नियमानुसार ही कार्य लिया गया है , जब भी प्रार्थी को अतिरिक्त कार्य सौंपा गया उसका भुगतान उसे नियमानुसार कर दिया गयौ । प्रार्थी को विभागीय समयानुसार एवं विभाग द्वारा जारी विभिन्न परिपत्रों अर्थात् परिपत्र नम्बर 24-11 /82 टी.ई.- II दिनांक 18-6-83 के अनुसरण में ही भुगतान किया गया है । अतः प्रार्थी किसी अनुतोष का अधिकारी नहीं है ।

4. मांग- पत्र के समर्थन में प्रार्थी ने स्वयं का शपथ- पत्र प्रस्तुत किया जिस पर अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधी द्वारा जिरह की गई तथा अप्रार्थी की

8. अप्रार्थी विभाग द्वारा प्रदर्श ए-1 व प्रदर्श ए-2 प्रार्थी द्वारा किये गये कार्य दिवसों एवं उसे विंये गये साप्ताहिक अवकाश व उसे किये गये भुगतान का विवरण प्रस्तुत किया गया है जिसे प्रार्थी द्वारा अपनी साक्ष्य में अस्वीकार नहीं किया गया है । अतः उनमें उल्लेखित भुगतान आदि के तथ्य सिद्ध होने माने जा सकते हैं । जिरह में अप्रार्थी के गवाह ने कहा है कि उम्मेदाराम से वीकली रेस्ट के दिन काम नहीं लिया गया व जब कभी उससे काम लिया गया उसका भुगतान कर 297 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

क्लॉज 65 के अनुसार ओवरटाईम एलाउन्स समाप्त करने की सिफारिश की गई है । अतः इससे प्रार्थी को कोई लाभ नहीं मिलता । दिया गया। उससे कभी सार्वजनिक अवकाश के दिन भी काम नहीं लिया गया , तारघर के चारों तरफ बाउन्ड्री बनी हुई थी, लॉकर जेनरेटर आदि ताले में रहते थे , रात्रि में ऑफिस में कैश नहीं रहता था , प्रार्थी से कभी ओवरटाईम नहीं करवाया गया व यदि कभी करवाया गया है तो उसे उसका भुगतान कर दिया गया है । ओवरटाईम के प्रावधान विभाग में लागू होते थे ।

9. जहाँ तक प्रार्थी को ओवरटाईम देय होने का प्रश्न है , इस सम्बन्ध में प्रार्थी द्वारा ओवरटाईम एलाउन्स के सम्बन्ध में ओ.एम. नं. 15012/3/86/ एस्टबलिशमेन्ट ( एलाउन्सेज ) दिनांक 19 मार्च , 1991 द्वारा प्रसारित निर्देशों की प्रति प्रस्तुत की है जिसके द्वारा इससे पूर्व में प्रसारित सभी निर्देशों को सुपरसीड किया गया है । इन निर्देशों के क्लॉज-3 के अनुसार :

"(a) The work in all offices should be so organized as ordinarily to be capable of being done. during the normal office hours . The question of overtime work to be done should arise only in special circumstances and where working beyond the prescribed offices hours is a regular feature , the offices and the officers should so stagger the working hours that the staffworking in the office or attached to officer attend to such work by rotation.

10. उक्त नियमों से स्पष्ट है कि सक्षम अधिकारी के निर्देशानुसार ही ओवरटाईम देय हो सकता है । प्रार्थी के विभाग द्वारा चौकीदारी की ड्यूटी के सम्बन्ध में जो परिपत्र जारी किये गये हैं वे इस प्रश्न के निर्धारण के लिए प्रासंगिक हैं । परिपत्र संख्या ई.एस.टी/ई. 10- ए/ II दिनांक 24-1-1979 के अनुसार यदि चौकीदार विभाग के भवन की चौकीदारी कर रहा है कि जिसके दरवाजे बन्द किये जाने पर वे अपने आप में सैल्फ कन्टेन हो जाते हैं वे चौकीदार उसमें निगरानी करता है तो चौकीदार की ड्यूटी 12 घण्टे की मानी जायेगी । इसके बाद जारी किये गये परिपत्र दिनांक 18-6-83 के अनुसार भी चौकीदारों को भवन व स्टोर की सामान्य देख - रेख के लिए नियुक्त किया जाता है अतः उनकी ड्यूटी 12 घण्टे मानी जायेगी । इन परिपत्रों के अनुसार चौकीदार की ड्यूटी 12 घण्टे की निर्धारित की गई है । ऐसी स्थिति में प्रार्थी का यह तर्क माने जाने योग्य नहीं है कि फैक्ट्री अधिनियम के अनुसार 48 घण्टे से अधिक कार्य लिये जाने की स्थिति में उसे ओवरटाईम देय था । चूंकि प्रार्थी अप्रार्थी विभाग का नियमित कर्मचारी था व वह ओवरटाईम विभागीय नियमों के अनुसार ही प्राप्त कर सकता था । ' प्रार्थी ने 12 घण्टे की ड्यूटी दी इस तथ्य में कोई विवाद नहीं है परन्तु यह उसकी सामान्य कार्य अवधि भी अतः सामान्य कार्य अवधिमें किये गये कार्य के लिए उसे ओवरटाईम देय नहीं था ।

11. प्रार्थी के कार्य की जो प्रकृति प्रार्थी स्वयं द्वारा व अप्रार्थी विभाग के गवाह द्वारा बताई गई है उसे देखते हुए यही माना जा सकता है कि प्राथी को भवन की सामान्य देख - रेख के लिए चौकीदार रखा गया था व जिस सामान की रेख-रेख वह करता था वह ताले में होता था ऐसे भवन की वह चौकीदारी नहीं कर रहा था जिसमें रात्रि में स्टोर के सामान का मुवमेन्ट होता हो । अतः परिपत्र के अनुसार उसकी सामान्य ड्यूटी 12 घण्टे ही मानी जा सकती है ।

(b) where in special circumstances , it becomes necessary to perform overtime work , the competent authority may authorize such overtime work after satisfying himself that the work is of such an urgent nature that it cannot be postponed in the public interest till the next workingday and the competent authority shall as far as possible , specify before hand the time up to which a Government servant may be required to perform overtime work. "

12. प्रार्थी ने इस तर्क के समर्थन में कि 48 घण्टे से ज्यादा काम लेने की स्थिति में ओवरटाईम देय था , 1993 ( 1 ) डब्लु.एल.सी. राज. 698 पर रिलायन्स प्लेस की है परन्तु यह निर्णय फैक्ट्री कामगारों के सम्बन्ध में था जो फैक्ट्री अधिनियम से शासित थे । प्रार्थी फैक्ट्री अधिनियम से शासित हो यह नहीं माना जा सकता। अतः उक्त निर्णय से प्रार्थी को कोई लाभ नही मिलता है ।

.."Cash Compensation in the form of overtime allowance for duty on Sundays/ Weekly or Fortnightly off-day/Second Saturday/Public holidays may is granted only in very exceptional circumstances where an officer not below the rank of Joint Secretary in the Secretariat Offices or the Head of the Department in the case of attached subordinate or other office is satisfied and certifies that it is not possible to grant compensatory leave."

13. अप्रार्थी विभाग की ओर से यह तर्क लिया गया है कि प्रार्थी ने रेफरेन्स में जनरल मैनेजर टेलीकॉम पाली को पक्षकार बनाया है जबकि दूर संचार विभाग , पाली 1-10-2000 से समाप्त हो गया है जो अब बी.एस.एन.एल के रूप मे स्वतंत्र कार्य कर रहा है जब कि इस सम्बन्ध में अप्रार्थी की ओर से पूर्व में प्रार्थना- पत्र दिनांक 8-3-07 भी प्रस्तुत किया गया था । अप्रार्थी विभाग के गवाह राजवीरसिंह द्वारा यह स्वीकार किया गया है कि विभाग की सभी लेनदारियां व देनदारियां बी.एस.एन.एल. में मर्ज हुई , जो कर्मचारी थे उन्हें ऑपशन दिया था कि वे चाहे तो बी.एस.एन.एल में रहें या ना रहे। जो कर्मचारी बी.एस.एन.एल में रहे उनकी पूर्व की सेवायें लगातार मानी गई डी.ओ. टी, के ऐसेस्ट भी बी.एस.एन.एल में वैस्ट हो गये , बी.एस.एन.एल व डी.ओ.टी. की क्या शर्ते रही यह मैं नहीं बता सकता अप्रार्थी की इस उक्त निर्देशों से यह स्पष्ट है कि ओवरटाईम भत्ता तभी दिया जा सकता है जब कि सक्षम अधिकारी द्वारा इस सम्बन्ध में निर्देश जारी किये गये हों । इन्हीं निर्देशों के क्लॉज 5 - जी के अनुसार रेजीडेन्ट ( नाईट ड्यूटी ) कलर्क व चपरासी जो सचिवालय या अन्य कार्यालय में कार्यरत हों उन पर यह निर्देश लागू नहीं होंगे । प्रार्थी चूंकि अप्रार्थी विभाग का नियमित कर्मचारी था अतः उसे वर्कशॉप स्टाफ या नॉन इण्डस्ट्रीयल स्टाफ जो वर्कशॉप में कार्यरत हों की श्रेणी में आना नहीं माना जा सकता । प्रार्थी ने पांचवें केन्द्रीय वेतन आयोग की सिफारिशों की प्रति भी इस सम्बन्ध में प्रस्तुत की है परन्तु इसके 298

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

साक्ष्य से यह स्पष्ट है कि कर्मचारियों को ऑपशन दिये जाने के बाद उनकी सेवाएं नये निगम में भी लगातार रही ऐसी स्थिति में यह नहीं माना जा सकता कि पूर्व में किये गये कार्य के सम्बन्ध में यदि कोई प्रश्न उत्पन्न होता है तो उसके लिए अप्रार्थी निगम उत्तरदायी नहीं हो। सभी लेनदारियां व देनदारियां बी.एस.एन.एल में मर्ज होना अप्रार्थी के गवाह ने स्वीकार किया है । ऐसी स्थिति में कर्मचारियों की पूर्व सेवा से संबंधित उत्तरदायित्व भी बी.एस.एन.एल में समाहित होना माना जा सकता है अतः अप्रार्थी विभाग द्वारा इस संबंध में लिया गया तर्क माने जाने योग्य नहीं है ।

उक्तविवेचन के अनुसार प्रार्थी ऐसा कोई कारण नहीं बता पाया है जिसके आधार पर उसे प्रश्नगत् अवधि का ओवरटाईम एलाउन्स देय होना माना जा सके।

15. अतः इस रेफरेन्स का उत्तर निम्न अवार्ड की टर्म्स में दिया जाता है:

: 16. अप्रार्थी विभाग द्वारा प्रार्थी को 3-10-87 से 1-11-2001 तक ओवरटाईम एलाउन्स नहीं दिया जाना उचित व वैध था । प्रार्थी किसी अनुतोष का अधिकारी नहीं होगा।

17. यह अवार्ड आज दिनांक 30-08-2007 को खुले न्यायालय में सुनाया गया।

पुष्पेन्द्र सिंह हाड़ा, न्यायाधीश नई दिल्ली , 27 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 119. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय जोधपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-12-07 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -40011 / 20/2001- आई आर ( डी यू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 27th December , 2007 S. Q. 119. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court , Jodhpur as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on27-12-2007.

[No. L-40011/20/2001 - IR(DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

अनुबन्ध

औद्योगिक विवाद अधिकरण एंव श्रम न्यायालय , जोधपुर पीठासीन अधिकारी:- श्री पुष्पेन्द्रसिंह हाड़ा आर. एच. जे. एस. औद्योगिक विवाद ( केन्द्रीय ) संख्या: 32/2001

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] उम्मेदाराम पुत्र श्री कीरताराम द्वारा अखिल भारतीय तार परियात कर्मचारी संघ, 516 , सुभाष नगर ' ए ' पाली ( राज. ) .प्रार्थी

बनाम

प्रबन्धक, दूर सचांर जिला पाली ( राज. ) .अप्रार्थी रेफरेन्सअन्तर्गत धारा 10 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 उपस्थितिः- :

( 1 ) श्री भागीरथ चन्दौरा प्रतिनिधी प्रार्थी

(2) श्री बी.पी. बोहरा प्रतिनिधी अप्रार्थी

अवार्ड

दिनांक:- 30-8-2007

1. भारत सरकार ने अपनी अधिसूचना क्रमांक एल. 40011/20/2001 आई. आर. (डीयू) दिनांक 10-04-2001 द्वारा निम्न विवाद अर्न्तगत धारा 10 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 के तहत इस न्यायालय को रेफर किया है। : -

Whether the action of General Manager , Telecom Distt. Pali Marwar in not giving overtime wages to Sh . Umedaram S/o Sh . Kirtaram watchman for working on weekly day of rest w.e.f. 3-10-1987 to till date is legal and justified ? If not what relief the union concern is entitled?

2. प्रार्थी ने अपना मॉग- पत्र इस आशय का प्रस्तुत किया है कि प्रार्थी उम्मेदाराम को चौकीदार के रूप में अप्रार्थी संस्थान में दिनांक 3-10-87 से नियुक्त किया गया प्रार्थी से साप्ताहिक सार्वजनिक अवकाश के दिन 12 घण्टे चौकीदारी का कार्य लिया जाता रहा जब कि प्रार्थी की डयूटी 8 घण्टे प्रतिदिन निर्धारित है , प्रार्थी ने मई 1999 से अप्रैल 2000 की अवधि में जोधपुर में ऑफिस में कार्य किया जहां उससे कोई अधिसमय कार्य साप्ताहिक अवकाश के दिन कार्य नहीं किया। वर्तमान में प्रार्थी पाली में अप्रार्थी के अधीन ड्राईविंग का कार्य कर रहा है । प्रार्थी द्वारा साप्ताहिक अवकाशों में अधिसमय कार्य के वेतन की राशि अप्रार्थीगण से मॉगी लेकिन उसे अदा नहीं की गई जिसके कारण यह औद्यौगिक विवाद उत्पन्न हुआ। प्रार्थी के समान अन्य व्यक्तियों द्वारा कार्य करने पर उन्हें साप्ताहिक अवकाश वेतन दिया जाता रहा है । अप्रार्थी द्वारा प्रार्थी को यह कहते हुए साप्ताहिक अवकाश के कार्य का भुगतान नहीं किया कि प्रार्थी की डयुटी 12 घण्टे की है जबकि प्रार्थी के स्थान पर अन्य व्यक्ति के कार्य करने की डयूटी 8 घण्टे कीहै , जो अधिनियम के प्रावधानों के विपरित है। अप्रार्थी संस्थान पर औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम के प्रावधान लागू होते हैं जिसके अनुसार अप्रार्थी किसी भी श्रमिक से प्रति सप्ताह 48 घण्टे से अधिक कार्य लेने पर अधिसमय कार्य की परिभाषा में आयेगा जिसके लिये अप्रार्थी को विधिनुसार मान्य वेतन श्रमिक को देना होगा । प्रार्थी अल्पवेतन भोगी [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

कर्मचारी है उसकी उक्त राशि अप्रार्थी ने अदा नहीं कर श्रम विरोधी कार्यवाही की है। प्रार्थी तारघर में कार्य करता है जो रात्रि में 12 बजे तक खुला रहता है । इस प्रकार प्रार्थी साप्ताहिक अवकाश के दिन किये गये कार्य की राशि मय ब्याज अप्रार्थी से प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी है, जो राशि प्रार्थी को अप्रार्थी से दिलाई जावे । 3. अप्रार्थी की ओर से जवाब में कहा गया है कि प्रार्थी अप्रार्थी विभाग में 3-10-87 से कार्यरत् है परन्तु उससे न तो कभी अधिसमय कार्य लिया गया त ही प्रार्थी ने अधिसमय कार्य किया प्रार्थी से विभागीय नियमानुसार ही कार्य लिया गया है , जब भी प्रार्थी को अतिरिक्त कार्य सौंपा गया उसका भुगतान उसे नियमानुसार कर दिया गया। प्रार्थी को विभागीय समयानुसार एवं विभाग द्वारा जारी विभिन्न परिपत्रों अर्थात परिपत्र नम्बर 24-11/82 टी.ई. - 11 दिनांक 18-6-83 के अनुसरण में ही भुगतान किया गया है। अतः प्प्रार्थी किसी अनुतोष का अधिकारी नहींहै।

4. माँग- पत्र के समर्थन मे प्रार्थी ने स्वयं का शपथ-पत्र प्रस्तुत किया जिसपर अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधी द्वारा जिरह की गई तथा अप्रार्थी की ओर से राजवीरसिंह का शपथ- पत्र प्रस्तुत किया गया जिसपर प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधी द्वारा जिरह की गई ।

5. दोनो पक्षों के प्रतिनिधीगण की बहस सुनी गई। पत्रावली का अवलोकन किया गया।

6. प्रार्थी ने यद्यपि अपने माँग - पत्र में जिस अवधि की साप्ताहिक अवकाश में अधिसमय कार्य के वेतन की राशि क्लेम की है , उसका विवरण मॉग - पत्र के साथ परिशिष्ठ में संलग्न करना बताया है परन्तु इस प्रकार का कोई परिशिष्ठ माँग - पत्र के साथ या बाद में भी प्रस्तुत नहीं किया गया है । प्रार्थी ने अपनी साक्ष्य में यह कहा है कि दिनांक 3-10-87 को वह अप्रार्थी विभाग मे चौकीदार के पद पर कार्यरत है मेरे से 12 घण्टे प्रतिदिन कार्य लिया गया जब कि मेरी डयुटी 8 घण्टे प्रतिदिन निधारित थी। मैनें ज्यादातर चौकीदारी का कार्य किया है व तारघर का परिसर खुला था, उक्त तारघर परिसर के चारों तरफ 2-3 फीट की दीवार थी , जेनरेटर , घाडियाँ , लॉकर बाहर खुले मे रहते थे जहाँ पर स्टोर , केश जनरेटर का इंजन अन्य सामान रहता था , रात को 12 बजे तक ऑफिस खुला रहता था , मेरे पास कैश की चाबी रहती थी, प्रतिदिन कैशियर से चार्ज लेना व देना होता था । मेरे द्वारा सेवा अवधि मे साप्ताहिक/सार्वजनिक अवकाश के दिन किये गये कार्य की राशि अप्रार्थी में बकाया है जो मय ब्याज अप्रार्थी से दिलवाई जावे । जिरह में इस गवाह ने कहा है कि पूरे बिल्डिंग की चौकीदारी मैं अकेले ही करता था। मैं कैशियर से रात को 12 बजे चार्ज लेता था, सुबह 8 बजे वापस दे देता था ।

7. अप्रार्थी की ओर से जो शपथ- पत्र प्रस्तुत हुआ है उसमें श्री राजवीरसिंह एस.डी.ई. ( एच.आर.डी. ) जी. एम. टी. जी. ने अपने साक्ष्य में यह कहा है कि प्रार्थी को वेतन उसके द्वारा किए गए कार्य के अनुरूप दिया गया है। प्रार्थी चौकीदार के पद पर था व रात्रिकालीन चौकीदार तारघर का कार्यकाल विभागीय नियमानुसार 12 घण्टे होने के कारण उसने अधिसमय कार्य नहीं किया है। विभागीय परिपत्र संख्या 24-11/82 टी हई- 11 दिनांक 8-11-83 परिपत्र संख्या

299

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

24-17 टी.ई/पी.ई-1 दिनांक फरवरी 1972 एवं परिपत्र संख्या ई. एस. टी/ई 10-ए/XXXXV II दिनांक 24-1-1979 व परिपत्र सं. 24-11/टी. ई. - 11 18-6-83 से स्पष्ट है कि जहाँ पब्लिक ट्रांजिक्शन नहीं होता एवं रात्रि में ताला लगा रहता है वहाँ चौकीदार का कार्यकाल 12 घण्टे तय किया गया है। तारघर रात्रि में दस बजे बंद हो जाता है एवं अगले दिन प्रातः सात बजे खुलता है , ऐसे तारघरों मे चौकीदार का कार्यकाल 12 घण्टे ही निश्चित किया गया है , जब प्रार्थी उम्मेदराम छुटटी पर रहता है तो इसके स्थान पर दूसरे कर्मचारी को वैकल्पिक व्यवस्था के बतौर लगाया जाता था जो कि चौकीदार के पद का न होकर किसी अन्य पद का उम्मीदवार होता था जिससे विभाग को नियमानुसार 8 घण्टे ही कार्य लिया जा सकता है । उम्मेदाराम से वीकली रेस्ट में कभी काम नहीं लिया गया व कभी लिया भी गया है तो उसे उसका भुगतान कर दिया गया।

8. जहाँ तक साप्ताहिक अवकाश के बदले में ओवरटाईम दिये जाने का प्रश्न है इस सम्बन्ध में प्रार्थी द्वारा ऑफिस मेमोरेन्डम नम्बर 16/66- एस्टबलिशमेन्ट ( 1 ) दिनांक 10 जनवरी 1968 व ऑफिस मेमोरेन्डम नं 49011 / 1/एस्टबलिशमेन्ट ( सी ) दिनांक 17-7-1976 पर रिलायन्स प्लेस की गई है । प्रार्थी ने 1987 से 10-4-2001 तक के. दौरान सार्वजानिक्र अवकाश या साप्ताहिक अवकाश के दौरान किये गये कार्य का ओवरटाईम क्लेम किया है। अतः इस अवधि के दौरान जो परिपत्र लागू थे उन्ही के आधार पर ओवरटाईम देय होना या नहीं होना निर्णित किया जा सकता है। प्रार्थी ने जो परिपत्र प्रस्तुत किये है उनके अनुसार यह निर्देशित किया गया है कि 15 दिन में एक बार 24 घण्टे का रेस्ट कर्मचारी को दिया जावे । परिपत्र दिनांक 10-1-1968 के अनुसार इस प्रकार का रेस्ट एक महीने में 48 घण्टे का था इसी परिपत्र में कम्पनसेटरी अवकाश की व्यवस्था भी की गई थी । पांचवे वेतन आयोग की सिफारिश के क्लॉज 65 के अनुसार ओवरटाईम समाप्त करने की सिफारिश की गई थी व ओवरटाईम के सम्बन्ध में जोनिर्देश ऑफिस मेमोरेन्डम नं 15012/3/86 एस्टबलिशमेन्ट ( एलाउन्स ) दिनांक 19-3-1991 द्वारा जारी किये गये हैं उनके अनुसार ओवरटाईम तभी दिया जा सकता है जब कि सक्षम अधिकारी द्वारा इस सम्बन्ध में निर्देश जारी किये गये हो व ओवरटाईम अपवाद स्वरूप ही दिया जा सकता है , नकद क्षतिपूर्ति सम्बन्ध में इन निर्देशों के क्लॉज 3 में निम्न व्यवस्थाकी गई है:-

Cash Compensation in the form of overtime allowance for dutyon Sunday/ Weekly or Fortnightly off-days /Second Saturdays /Public holidays may be granted only in very exceptional circumstances where an officer not below the rank of Joint Secretary in the Secretariat Offices or the Head ofthe Department in the case of attached subordinate or other office is satisfied and certifies that it is not possible to grant compensatory leave . "

प्रार्थी द्वारा किये गये कार्य का जो विवरण प्रदर्श ए-2 अप्रार्थी द्वारा प्रस्तुत किया गया है उसके अनुसार प्रार्थी को नियमित रूप से वीकली ऑफ दिया गया है प्रार्थी ने इसके विपरीत ऐसा कोई विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं किया है जिससे यह प्रकट होता हो कि सार्वजनिक अवकाश के 300

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

जाना उचित व वैध था। प्रार्थी किसी अमुतोष का अधिकारी नहीं होगा।

14. यह अवार्ड आज दिनांक 30-08-2007 को खुले न्यायालय मे सुनाया गया।

पुष्पेन्द्र सिंह हाड़ा, न्यायाधीश

नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर , 2007

दिन या उसको admissible weekly- off rest न दिया जाकर उससे काम लिया गया हो व उसका ओवरटाईम नहीं दिया गया हो। प्रार्थी द्वारा ऐसा सिद्ध नहीं किये जाने से यही माना जा सकता है कि प्रदर्श ए-2 में जो विवरण अप्रार्थी विभाग द्वारा दिया गया है उसके अनुसार उसे अवकाश के बदले देय कार्य से weekly - off दिया गया व जब उसे अवकाश व विभागीय परिपत्रों के अनुसार रेस्ट दिया गया है तो यह नहीं माना जा सकता कि वह ओवरटाईम के लिए भी entitled हो। इस प्रकार प्रार्थी यह सिद्ध नहीं कर पाया है कि अप्रार्थी विभाग द्वारा प्रार्थी पर जो नियम लागू थे उनका उल्लंघन किया जाकर उसे सार्वजनिक अवकाश या weekly rest के दिन का कोई देय भुगतान न किया गया हो।

का.आ. 120-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डाक विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबंध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायलाय जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/ एलसी/आर/ 187/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-12-07 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं.एल-40012/ 355/ 2000- आई आर ( डी यू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 27th December , 2007

9. प्रार्थी ने इस तर्क के समर्थन में कि 48 घण्टे से ज्यादा काम लेने की स्थिति में ओवरटाईम देय था , 1993 ( 1 ) डब्ल्यू.एल.सी राज . 698 पर रिलायन्स प्लेस की है परन्तु यह निर्णय फैक्ट्री कामगारों के सम्बन्ध में था जो फैक्ट्री अधिनियम से शासित थे । प्रार्थी फैक्ट्री अधि- नियम से शासित हो यह नहीं माना जा सकता। अतः उक्त निर्णय से प्रार्थी को कोई लाभ नहीं मिलता है।

S.O. 120. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. CGIT/ LC/R/ 187/2000 ) Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Post and their work- man, which was receivedby the Central Government on 27-12-2007.

[No. L-40012/355 /2000 - IR(DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO . CGIT/LC/R/ 187/2000

Workman/Union

Presiding Officer : Shri C.M. Singh Shri Sirajuddin , S/O Shri Gatasuddin , R/ O Empire Talkies Compound , Cantt. , Jabalpur .

Versus

10. अप्रार्थी विभाग की ओर से यह तर्क लिया गया है कि प्रार्थी ने रेफरेन्स में जनरल मैनेजर टेलीकॉम पाली को पक्षकार बनाया है जब कि दूर संचार विभाग , पाली1-10-2000 से समाप्त हो गया है जो अब बी.एस.एम.एल. के रूप मे स्वतंत्र कार्य कर रहा है जब कि इस सम्बन्ध में अप्रार्थी की ओर से पूर्व में प्रार्थना- पत्र दिनांक 8-3-07 भी प्रस्तुत किया गया था। अप्रार्थी विभाग के गवाह राजवीरसिंह द्वारा यह स्वीकार किया गया है कि विभाग की सभी लेनदारियों व देनदारियों बी.एस.एन.एल में मर्ज हुई , जो कर्मचारी थे उन्हे ऑपशन दिया था कि वे चाहे तो बी. एस.एन. एल में रहें या ना रहे । जो कर्मचारी बी.एस.एन.एल में रहे उनकी पूर्व की सेवायें लगातार मानी गई , डी. ओ.टी के ऐसेस्ट भी बी.एस.एन.एल. मे वैस्ट हो गये , बी.एस.एन.एल व डी.ओ.टी की क्या शर्तें रही यह मैं नहीं बता सकता। अप्रार्थी की इस साक्ष्य से यह स्पष्ट है कि कर्मचारियों को ऑपशन दिये जाने के बाद उनकी सेवाएँ नये निगम में भी लगातार रही ऐसी स्थिति में यह नहीं माना जा सकता कि पूर्व में किये गये कार्य के सम्बन्ध में यदि कोई प्रश्न उत्पन्न होता है तो उसके लिए अप्रार्थी निगम उत्तरदायी नहीं हो। सभी लेनदारियों व देनदारियों बी.एस.एन.एल. में मर्ज होना अपार्थी के गवाह ने स्वीकार किया है । ऐसी स्थिति में कर्मचारियों की पूर्व सेवा से संबधित उत्तरदायित्व भी बी.एस.एन.एल. में समाहित् होना माना जा सकता है अतः अप्रार्थी विभाग द्वारा इस संबंध में लिया गया तर्क माने जाने योग्य नहीं है।

ChiefPost Master (S.S.P. ) , MainPost Office , Civil Lines, Jabalpur .

Management

AWARD

11. उक्त विवेचन के अनुसार प्रार्थी ऐसा कोई कारण नहीं बता पाया है जिसके आधार पर उसे प्रश्नगत अवधि का साप्ताहिक अवकाश सार्वजानिक अवकाश का ओवरटाईम एलाउन्स देय होना माना जा सके

Passed on this 8th day of November 2007 जाता है: 12. अतः इस रेफरेन्स का उत्तर निम्न अवार्ड की टर्म्स में दिया

13. अप्रार्थी विभाग द्वारा प्रार्थी को 3-10-87 से साप्ताहिक अवकाश/सार्वजनिक अवकाश का ओवरटाईम एलाउन्स नहीं दिया

1. TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No.L - 40012/ 355/2000/ IR( DU) dated 31-10-2000 has referred the following dispute for adjudica- tion by this tribunal : ----

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

"Whether the action of the Chief Post Master (SSP) , HeadOffice, Jabalpur in not regularizing the services ofSh . Sirajuddin , EDD and subsequently terminating hisservices w.e.f. 1-11-98 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled ?" 2.Vide order dated 12-6-07 passed on the ordersheet ofthis reference proceeding, the reference proceeded exparte against the management . Workman Sirajuddin has filed his statement of claim . His case in brief is as follows . That he was appointed on the post of letter box peon in the year 1990 on the basis of monthly payment . That he was working with the postman Abdul Samad who has been promoted and posted at other place . That workman have 9 years experience of the regular duty of the post of letter box peon . Therefore he is entitled for regularisation , but the management wrongly called the candidate from the employment exchange. The workman also appeared in the interview but the management wrongly appointed Respondent No.4 who has no experience for the post . The action of the management is illegal and against the provisions of law. It is prayed that the order of termination ofthe workman be setaside and the workman be reinstated in service with all back wages and benefits .

3. The management failed to file Written Statement .

4. Workman Sirajuddin in order to prove his case filedhisaffidavit.

5. I have heard Shri B.S.Patel , Advocate for the workman and perused the evidence on record.

6. The case ofthe workman is fully established from hisuncontroverted affidavit . ( Annexure - P- 1 ) sworn - in in the affidavit is a register through which the management gave salary to the workman. Annexure P-2 to the affidavit isregistration ofthe name of workman with the Employment Exchange Office. EX.P-3 & P- 4 to the affidavit are the Educational Certificates of the workman . The case of the workman is fully proved by his affidavit and the documents mentioned above . The reference , therefore , deserves to be decided in favour of the workman and against the management with costs . It has not been averred by the workmanthat. after his termination , he has not been gainfully employed . Not only this, no evidence has been given on that point. Therefore the workman is not entitled to back wages and benefits.

7. In view of the above, the reference is decided in favour of the workman and against the management with cost hoiding that the action of the Chief Post Master (SSP), HeadOffice, Jabalpur in not regularizing the services of Sh.Sirajuddin , EDD and subsequently terminating his services w.e.f. 1-11-98 is not iegal and justified. He is entitled to be reinstated but without back wages .

8. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment asper rules.

C. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer

301

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

नई दिल्ली , 27 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 121-.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार नेशनल सेविंगस ऑर्गेनाईजेशन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जबलपुर के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/एलसी/ आर/ 175/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-12-07 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-42012/136/95 - आईआर (डीयू) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्कअधिकारी New Delhi , the 27th December, 2007 S.O. 121. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT / LCAR/ 175 /96) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to themanagement ofNational Savings Organisation and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 27-12-2007.

[No. L-40012/ 136/95 - IR(DU) ]

SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR NO. CGIT/LC/R/175/96

Presiding Officer: Shri C.M. Singh Shri Chhatrapal Singh Kahatri , S/o Shri Chandan Singh Kahatri , Vill& Post Setar,

Workman/Union Distt. Bilaspur (C.G)

Versus

TheRegional Director,

National Saving Organisation,

MPEastern Region , 33 , Anand Nagar, Raipur.

Managements The DeputyRegional Director , Nationai Saving Organisation , TilakNagar, Bilsaspur(C.G)

AWARD

Passed on this 14th day of December , 2007 1. TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No.L -42012/ 136/ 95 - IR( DU ) dated 30-8-96 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :-

302

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008 /PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

TRINDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 361/2007

Date of Passing Award- 7th December, 2007

Between:

"Whether the action ofthe management of Regional Director, National Savings , Raipur in terminating the services ofShri Chhatrapal Singh is justified ? Ifnot, to what relief is the workman is entitled to?"

1. The Management of the Executive Engineer,

C.P.W.D. , Central Electrical Division , Plot No. A/ 3 , Near Governor's House , Bhubaneswar (Orissa) 751001 .

2. The Management of Accountant General (A& E ) , Orissa, Bhubaneswar - 751001

... 1st Party-Managements .

(And)

Their Workman, Shri Surendra Nath Das , 2. Vide order dated 13-6-07 passed on the ordersheet ofthisreference proceeding reveals that inspite of sufficient service ofnotice , no body put in appearance for the parties and6-8-07 was fixed for further orders . On 6-8-07 , no one responded for the parties and the reference was adjourned to12-12-07 for further orders , Again on 12-12-07 no body responded for the parties inspite of sufficient service of notice on the parties . Under the circumstances , this tribunal was left with no option but to close the reference for award and consequently the reference was closed for award .

3. It appears from the above that the parties have no interest in this reference . Therefore no dispuate award without any orders as to costs is passed in this reference .

Ex- Lift Operator, C/ o . Muralidhar Das, Old AG Colony, Qr. No. Type - II -218 , Unit- IV, Bhubaneswar , Orissa -751 001 .

2nd Party-Workman .

4. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment

Appearances:

asper rules.

Shri Sant Lal ,

.. For 1st Party C. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

Management No.1 नई दिल्ली , 27 दिसम्बर , 2007

.... For Management No.2

For himself, the

Executive Engineer None . Shri S.N. Das ,

2nd Party- Workman.

AWARD

का.आ. 122-, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.पी.डब्ल्यू. डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 361/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-12-07 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-42012/ 8/2000- आईआर (डीयू) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour , in exercise ofpowers conferred by Clause (d) of sub- section (1 ) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) have referred the following dispute for adjudication vide their Order No.L 42012/8 /2000/ IR(DU), dated 31-05-2000:

NewDelhi , the 27th December, 2007

"Whether the action of the Management of C.P.W.D. , Bhubaneswar by terminating the services ofShri S.N. Das , Lift Operator after engaging 9 years ofcontinuous service in AG Office, Bhubaneswar is genulne & justified? If not , to what relief the workman/disputant is entitled ?"

S.O. 122.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 361 / 2001 ) Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of C.P. W.D. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 27.12.2007.

[No. L-42012/8 /2000- IR(DU) ]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT,

BHUBANESWAR

Present : Shri N.K.R. Mohapatra ,

PresidingOfficer, C.G.I.T. -cum - Labour Court ,

Bhubaneswar .

2. Undisputedly it is the responsibility of Central Public Works Department (C.P.W.D. ) to maintain the lift points and electrical appliances installed in different office establishment of Central Government . It is alleged by the disputant that for operating the lift point of A.G. Office at Bhubaneswar he was initially engaged after necessary interviewby the Asst. Engineer, C.P.W.D. (Electrical ) for a period from 1-8-1990 to 30-11-1990 on payment of a contractual sum ofRs . 1000/- per month . On completion of the above period he was further engaged with time to time increase in his wages for about 9 years and then the Management by entrusting the said job to a contractor agency terminated him with effect from 1-9-1999 without payment of any retrenchment compensation or terminal benefits . It is alleged by the workman that he was refused 303.

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

employment in the above manner so as to avoid his regularization.

"Work Orders" so as to modulate that he was issued with work orders on the basis of quotation given by him . In view ofthe above stand ofthe workman it has now become necessary to find out the real unlying intention behind those documents .

3. The Management on the other hand averred that the disputant was a contractor and therefore on the basis oftime to time quotations given by him he was engaged up till 31st Dec. , 1998 to operate the lift but after entrustment of the said job to another contractor on tender basis , he was disengaged from 1-9-1999 . In view of the above the workman is not entitled for any relief as claimed by him . / Besides his nature of working contractual , he is also not entitled to be regularized against any vacant post.

4. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties the following issues were framed .

ISSUES

1. Whether the reference is maintainable ?

2. Whether the action of the Management of C.P.W.D. , Bhubaneswar , by terminating the services ofShri S.N. Das , Lift Operator after engaging 9 years of continuous service is genuine and justified?

3. What relief the workman/ disputant is entitled to?

5. Each party have examined one witnesses in support of their respective cases . They have also filed some documents to justify their respective stands .

FINDINGS :

ISSUE NO . 1

6. There being no substantial challenge to the question ofmaintainability of the case by the Management either during trial or in their counter , this Issue is answered affirmatively.

8.Thedocuments Ext . -A to E are the " Work Orders" said to have had been issued to the workman . The workman is found to have signed against the Column meant for the contractor as it appears from the above documents . But that itself is not sufficient to say that, the workman had taken the contract of operating the lift . It rather suggests that the amount payable to the workman was only contractual . This has gained support from the evidence of theManagement Witness when he says that, on the basis ofsingle quotation the workman was asked to operate the lift. Further more had the workman taken the contract he would have engaged some other man to operate the lift. When admittedlythe workman himselfwas operating the lift it suggests that , he was not a contractor at all . Further more the aforesaid document indicates that the workman was paid month- wise and according to the Management Witness he was paid depending upon the rate of minimum wages changed from time to time . Had really the workman taken the contract the payment would have been made on lump-sum basis but not on monthly basis which otherwise suggests that in the garb of "work order " the workman was engaged on monthly paid daily wage basis as claimed by him and the " work orders " have been created by the Management as a substitute of a money voucher . In these premises there appears sufficient force in the saying of the workman that the concept of "work order " as advanced bytheManagement is nothing but a stage managed affair.

ISSUE NOS . 2 & 3

9. It is the settled law that, under the definition of Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act, termination of a workman for any reasons whatsoever tantamounts to retrenchment attracting Section 25 - F of the Industrial Disputes Act . Since the workman was admittedly engaged continuously for about 9 years with superficial break on Sunday, the refusal of employment to him amounts to retrenchment and as such he is entitled to get all the consequential benefits ofsuch retrenchment as prescribed under Section 25 - F of the Industrial Disputes Act .

10. Accordingly it is held that the action of the Management in refusing employment to the workmanwith effect from 1-9-1999 is not justified and proper . As the workman has not been paid any such terminal benefits he is entitled for the same and for this the Management is directed to reinstate the workman against the post of lift Operator , which according to the Management Witness is still lying vacant with 50% back wages calculated in minimum wage rate scale.

11. The reference is answered accordingly.

N. K. R. MOHAPATRA, PresidingOfficer 7. These issues are taken up together as they are interdependent . Admitting that the workman was engaged to operate the lift ofthe A.G. Building from 1-8-1990 till he was disengaged from 1-9-1999, it has been deposedby the Management Witness that the Executive Engineer of C.P.W.D. is competent to issue work order not exceeding one lakh while the Assistant Engineer was competent to issue such work order not exceeding Rs . 1500 . Accordingly on the basis of single quotation the workman was given the contract of operating the lift by the Asst . Engineer and it was extended from time to time on the basis of fresh quotation given by the workman . To justify the same some work orders marked as Ext . -A to Ext . - E havebeen produced by the Management . These read along with the pleadings of the Management show that initially the workman was paid Rs . 1000 per month and thereafter it was raised to Rs . 1500 and then to Rs . 1647 from October 1996 and then @ Rs . 1857 per month . Challenging the above " Work Order " it is stated by the workman ( W.W. - I ) that though he was engaged on monthly basis with time to time increase in the wages , the Management had simply taken his signature on these

62GI/08-19 304

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] LIST OF WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF THEWORKMAN

Ext. -20 -Copy of minutes of the meeting held with CPWD. Mazdoor Union on 22-8-92

Workman Witness No.I

-Shri SurendraNathDas. Ext. -20/1 -Copy of minutes of meeting held with CPWD MazdoorUnion on 25-3-94 .

Ext. -21 -Copy of letter dated 7-12-1995.

LIST OF WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF THE MANAGEMENT

Ext.-21 /1 -Recommendation letter dated 17-12-1996.

Managerment Witness No.1 -Shri Sant Lal .

Ext. -22 -Copy of office memo issued by Govt . of India , CPWD, NewDelhi .

LIST OF EXHIBITS ON BEHALF OF THE 2ND PARTY WORKMAN

Ext- 1 -Copy of representation of workman dated 1-12-1988.

Ext. -23 -Copy ofletter dated 7-12-1995 ofEE (Elect .) BCDD, C.P.W.D. Bhubaneswar to Asstt . Engineer , (Electrical) BCE Sub- Division, CPWD, BBSR .

LIST OF EXHIBITS ON BEHALF OF THE 1st PARTY MANAGEMENT

Ext. -2 -Copy of representation of workman to the AccountantGeneral (A & E) , Orissa to regularize him.

Ext. -A-Copy of work order dated 1-1-1995 .

Ext. -B-Copyof work order dated 1-4-1995.

Ext-3 -Copy of the service order of the OTIS Elevator Company.

Ext.-C-Copy of work order dated 30-3-1996 .

Ext. -D-Copy ofwork order dated 30-9-1996.

Ext.-4--Copy of letter of J.E.dated 4-6-1997 which the workmancarried to the OTIS Office.

Ext. -E-Copy ofwork order dated 31-3-1999.

Ext. -F-Copy ofOffice Memo ofC.P.W.D. , Kolkata

dated24-1-2007.

Ext -5 -Copy of the extract ofthe CPWD Manual in regard tothework charge establishment.

नईदिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर , 2007

Ext -6 -Copy ofthe log book maintained from time to time by the workman in the A.G. Office, Orissa.

Ext -7 -Copy ofthe daily lift checking report submitted to the J.E. ofC.P.W.D.

Ext. -8 -Copy of the experience certificate granted tothe workman by the A.E. and the Accounts Officer of theOffice of the A.G. , Orissa.

का.आ. 123, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विषाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 24/1992 ) को प्रकाशित करती है ,

जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-12-07 को प्राप्त हुआ था । Ext -9 -Copy of the Identity card granted/issued to the workmanby the office of the A.G. , Orissa.

[सं.एल -41011 /46/ 1991 -डी-2( बी ) आईआर( बी-1 ) ]

अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी Ext-10 -Copy of the salary certificate granted to the workmanby the A.E.

New Delhi , the 27th December , 2007 Ext- 11 -Another salary certificate (Xerox copy) granted to the workman by another Asst. Engineer.

Ext -12 -Copy of another salary certificate granted to the workman by another A.E. 1

Ext-13 -Copy of another certificate granted by another A.E. to the workman .

S.O. 123. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 24/1992) ofCentral Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Central Railway and their workman , received by the Central Government on 27-12-2007.

Ext-14-Copy ofthe certificate granted to the workman by theDy. Accountant General in regard to rendering services.

[No. L-41011 /46/1991 -D-2(B) IR( B- 1 ) ]

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer Ext-15 -Copy ofanother certificate granted to the workman bythe D.A.G. in regard to the services renderedby theworkman.

ANNEXURE

Ext. 16 -Copy of representation ofthe workman as a second reminder to the S.E. (Electrical) for regularization of services.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO.CGIT/LC/R/24/92

PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRI C. M. SINGH

Ext+17 -Copy of another representation of the workman made in the form of reminder to the ChiefEngineer in regard to his services .

ThePresident,

Ext-18 -Copyof work order.

Chaturth Shreni Railway Mazdoor Congress , Ext. -18/1 to 18 /24 -Copy of work order.

Central Railway( INTUC),

Ext. 19 -Copy ofoffice letter dated 9-11-2004.

Workman/Union

2/236 , Namner , Agra

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Versus

TheDivisional Engineer(S), Central Railway, Bhopal, The Divisional Railway Manager (S ), Central Railway, Bhopal

Managements

AWARD

Passed on this 14th day of December 2007 1.TheGovernment of India, Ministry ofLabour vide its Notification No.L-41011 /46/91 -D-2(B) dated 20-2-92has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

"Whether the action of Divisional Engineer (S), Central Railway, Bhopal, Asstt . Engineer (M), C.Rly. Itarsi and DRM( P) , C.Rly. , Bhopal in terminating the services of S/ Sh.Nandoo, S/o Sh.Daulat, Mohanlal S/ o Sh.Kishanlal and Philips S/o Sh .Uttamrao is justified? If not, what relief they are entitled to?"

2. Vide order dated 12-12-07, the referencewas closed for award for the reason that none of the parties responded to the call of the case and the tribunal was left with no option but to close the reference for award.

3. It appears from the above that the parties have no interest in the reference proceeding. Perhaps no dispute is left between the parties . Therefore , no dispute award is passed without any orders as to costs .

4. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

C. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 27 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 124.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार नोर्दन रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण जोधपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 14/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-12-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-41012/167/2001- आईआर ( बी-1 ) ]

अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 27th December , 2007 S.O. 124. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 14/2002) of Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Jodhpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Northern Railways and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 27-12-2007.

[No. L-41012/167/2001 -IR (B- 1 )]

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

305

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

अनुबंध

औद्योगिक विवाद अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय , जोधपुर पीठासीन अधिकारी: श्री पुष्पेन्द्रसिंह हाड़ा , आर. एच. जे. एस.

केन्द्रीय श्रम विवाद संख्या : 14/2002

श्री पूनमचन्द जोशी द्वारा ललित शर्मा, संयुक्त महामंत्री, भारतीय मजदूर संघ , एस.बी.बी. जे. मंडिया रोड शाखा , एल.आई.सी.

बिल्डिग , पाली

..प्रार्थी

बनाम

उप मुख्य यांत्रिक इंजीनियर वर्कशॉप , उत्तर रेलवे , जोधपुर

अफ्रर्थीगण रेफरेन्स अर्न्तगत धारा 10 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947

उपस्थिति:-

(1) श्री अनिल मेहता प्रतिनिधी प्रार्थी उप.

(2) अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधी श्री डी. एस. फेडरिक उप.

अवार्ड

दिनांक 20-9-2007

1. भारत सरकार ने अपनी अधिसूचना क्रमांक एल- 41012/167/2001 - आई आर ( बी-1 ) दिनांक 30-4-2002 के तहत निम्न विवाद अन्तर्गत धारा 10 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 इस न्यायालय को रेफर किया है:-

" क्याश्री पूनमचन्द जोशी को लेब सहायक उसके नियोजक ( 1 ) चीफ वर्कस इंजीनियर उत्तर रेलवे बड़ोदा हाऊस, नईदिल्ली ( 2 ) उप मुख्य मैकेनिकल इंजीनियर वर्कशॉप उत्तर रेलवे जोधपुर द्वारा जे.सी.एम.ए. से दिनांक 27-7-94 से लेब सहायक के पद पर पदावनत किया जाना उचित एवं वैध है ? यदि नहीं तो श्रमिक अपने नियोजक से क्या राहत पाने का अधिकारी है ?

2. प्रार्थी यूनियन की ओर से एक मांग - पत्र इस आशय का प्रस्तुत किया गया कि ऋर्थी पूनमचन्द जोशी भारतीय मजदूर संघ का सदस्य है , उसकी नियुक्ति अार्थी संस्थान में लेथ खलासी के पद पर दिनांक 14-3-1975 को हुई , प्रार्थी को 26 जुलाई , 1978 को 260-430 के वेतनमान में लेब असिस्टेन्ट के पद पर पदोन्नत कर डीजल शेड भगत की कोठी, जोधपुर में पदस्थापित किया गया । अप्रार्थी द्वारा 25-2-1983 के पत्र से प्रार्थी को एडहॉक बेसिस पर जे.सी.एम.ए. के पद पर पदोन्नत किया गया जिस पद पर प्रार्थी ने 25-2-1983 को कार्यभार ग्रहण किया व 27-7-1994 तक 11 वर्ष पांच माह 2 दिन तक कार्य किया, प्रार्थी ने उसे उक्त पद पर कन्फर्म करने हेतु निवेदन किया जो अप्रार्थी' ने अपने पत्र दिनांक 26-2-92 द्वारा प्रार्थी को एडहॉक जूनियर केमीकल एण्ड मेटालर्जिकल असिस्टेन्ट के पद से पदानवत कर पुनः लेब असिस्टेन्ट के पद पर पदस्थापित कर दिया , जिसके विरुद्ध प्रार्थी ने केन्द्रीय प्रशासनिक अधिकरण में प्रार्थना-पत्र 306

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008 /PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

किसी अनुतोष का अधिकारी नहीं है । प्रार्थी का क्लेम मय खर्चे खारिज किया जावे ।

4. मांग - पत्र के समर्थन में प्रार्थी ने स्वयं का शपथ- पत्र प्रस्तुत किया जिस पर अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि द्वारा जिरह की गई तथा अप्रार्थी की ओर से एस.आर. वर्षा उप मुख्य बांत्रिक अभियन्ता वर्कशॉप का शपथ-पत्र प्रस्तुत किया गया जिस पर प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि द्वारा जिरह की गई । :

5. दोनों पक्षों के प्रतिनिधिगण की बहस सुनी गई । पत्रावली का अवलोकन किया गया ।

प्रस्तुत किया जिस पर न्यायालय द्वारा 27-1-94 को आदेश पारित किया कि यदि पदोन्नति कोटा उपलब्ध हो तो सीनीयोरिटी के अनुसार प्रार्थी को उक्त पद पर कन्सीडर करते हुए पदोन्नत किया जावे तथ तक पदानवत नहीं किया जावे । प्रार्थी उक्त आदेश के फलस्वरूप पदानवत करने के पश्चात् भी अप्रार्थी संस्थान में जे.सी.एम.ए. के पद पर कार्य करता रहा । अप्रार्थी प्रार्थी से कनिष्ठ कर्मचारी श्री देवीलाल जोलेब असिस्टेन्ट की केडर में कनिष्ठ था को पदोन्नत किया जब कि प्रार्थी ने 1983 से 1994 तक लगातार बिना किसी व्यवधान के जे.सी. एम.ए. के पद पर कार्य किया उक्त पद पर पदोन्नत नहीं किया गया । प्रार्थी को अनुचित एवं अवैधानिक तरीके से जे.सी.एम.ए. के पद से लेब असिस्टेन्ट के पद पर पदानवत किया गया है जब कि अप्रार्थी संस्थान में जे.सी.एम.ए. पद की 50 प्रतिशत पदोन्नति श्रेणी में तीन पद रिक्त थे । प्रार्थी को लिखित परीक्षा के लिए आमंत्रित किया जिसमें प्रार्थी उत्तीणी हुआ , प्रार्थी का नाम परीक्षा परिणाम में उत्तीर्ण कर्मचारियों के क्रमांक -3 पर अंकित है किन्तु अप्रार्थी द्वारा प्रार्थी को किसी प्रकार की प्राथमिकता नहीं दी गई एवं जानबूझकर प्रार्थी से कनिष्ठ कर्मचारी को जे.सी.एम.ए. के पद पर पदोन्नत कर दिया । अतः प्रार्थी को अप्रार्थी द्वारा जे.सी.एम.ए. के पद से लेबर सहायक के पद पर पदानवत किये जाने का आदेश दिनांक 27-7-94 अवैध घोषित किया जाकर प्रार्थी को 27-7-94 से ही जे.सी.एम.ए. बनाये जाने का अवार्ड पारित किया जाये ।

6. यह तथ्य विवादित नहीं है कि प्रार्थी को अप्रार्थी के आदेश दिनांक 25-2-83 से अस्थाई आधार पर जे.सी.एम.ए. के पद पर लगाया गया व आदेश दिनांक 26-12-92 द्वारा उसे इस पद से हटाया जाकर पुनः लेब असिस्टेन्ट के पद पर पदस्थापित किया गया । प्रार्थी द्वारा केन्द्रीय प्रशासनिक अधिकरण द्वारा जारी स्थगन आदेश के कारण प्रार्थी ने इस पद पर 1994 तक कार्य किया । केन्द्रीय प्रशासनिक अधिकरण द्वारा प्रार्थी की याचिका का इस निर्देश के साथ निस्तारण किया गया कि यदि प्रमोशन कोटा में जे.सी.एम.ए. पद रिक्त हो तो प्रार्थी का एडहॉक प्रमोशन किये जाने के लिए प्रार्थी के नाम पर सीनीयोरिटी के अनुसार विचार किया जावे व तब तक प्रार्थी को रिवर्ट नहीं किया जावे । अप्रार्थी के अनुसार नियमानुसार जे.सी.एम.ए. पद के लिए लिखित परीक्षा ली गई जिसमें प्रार्थी भी सम्मिलित हुआ । प्रार्थी मौखिक परीक्षा में फैल हो गया जिससे उसे पैनल पर नहीं रखा गया । प्रार्थी का यह कथन है कि देवीलाल व कैलाश वसन्दानी उससे जूनियर है गलत है बल्कि प्रार्थी देवीलाल व कैलाश वसन्दानी से जूनियर है । अप्रार्थी की ओर से एनेक्सचर -4 पत्र दिनांक 17-8-96 प्रस्तुत किया गया है जिसमें जे.सी.एम.ए. पद के लिए लिखित परीक्षा में उत्तीर्ण विभिन्न कर्मचारियों को साक्षात्कार हेतु उपस्थित होने के निर्देश दिये गये थे । प्रार्थी का नाम भी इसमें था इससे स्पष्ट है कि प्रार्थी ने लिखित परीक्षा में भाग लिया, लिखित परीक्षा व साक्षात्कार के पश्चात् ऋषभराज कल्ला व मदनलाल को जे.सी.एम.ए. के पैनल पर रखा गया अन्य कर्मचारियों को इस पैनल के उपयुक्त नहीं पाया गया । अप्रार्थी के गवाह एस. आर. वर्मा ने भी इन तथ्यों की पुष्टि की है व प्रार्थी ने ऐसा कोई तथ्य प्रस्तुत नहीं किया है जिससे अप्रार्थी द्वारा प्रस्तुत दस्तावेजों से अन्यथा कोई स्थिति बनना मानी जा सके। अप्रार्थी द्वारा एनेक्सचर-6 सौनौयोरिटी लिस्ट भी प्रस्तुत की गई है जिसमें देवीलाल ऋषभराज कल्ला व कैलाश वसन्दानी प्रार्थी से वरिष्ठ हैं । 3. अप्रार्थी की ओर से जवाब में कहा गया है कि प्रार्थी को 27-7-94 के जे.सी.एम.ए. से लेब सहायक के पद पर पदानवत किया जानाबिल्कुल सही और नियमों के अन्तर्गत था । प्रार्थी 14-3-75 को बतौर सबस्टीट्यूट लेब खलासी के पद पर लोको फोरमैन मेड़ता रोड के अधीन नियुक्त हुआ था न कि लेख खलासी के पद पर , प्रार्थी को 28-12-79 के आदेश से लेब सहायक के पद पर पदोन्नत किया न कि26-7-78 को । प्रार्थी को अप्रार्थी के पत्र दिनांक 25-2-1983 के द्वारा तदर्थ आधार पर स्थानीय व्यवस्था पर पदोन्नत कर जे.सी.एम.ए. वेतनमान 38-560 वेतन पर लोको शेड , जोधपुर में लगाया गया तथा उक्त पत्र के अनुसार प्रार्थी को यह साफ तौर पर तथा लिखित रूप में बताया गया कि उक्त पदोन्नति पूर्णतया अस्थाई एवं तदर्थ स्थानीय व्यवस्था पर है और भविष्य में ऐसी पदोन्न्ती के लिए उसे किसी प्रकार का अधिकार प्राप्त नहीं होगा । प्रार्थी को पत्र दिनांक 26-12-92 के अनुसार लेब सहायक के पद पर पदावनत् करने के आदेश जारी किये गये क्योंकि जे.सी.एम.ए. के पद हेतु सीधी भर्ती द्वारा चयनित उम्मीदवार अश्विनी कुमार सी.एम.टी. /लखनऊ के पत्र दिनांक 19-12-1992 के अन्तर्गत जोईन करने हेतु उपस्थित हुआ । प्रार्थी द्वारा सी.ए.टी जोधपुर में प्रकरण दर्ज कर 9-1-1993 को पदावनत् नहीं करने हेतु स्थगन आदेश प्राप्त किया । प्रार्थी 1993 में जारी वरीयता सूचि में देवीलाल , कैलाश वसन्दानी व श्री ऋषभराज कल्ला से जूनियर है, अप्रार्थी द्वारा देवीलाल को नियमानुसार सही तौर परजे. सी.एम.ए. पह पर पदोन्नत किया गया । प्रार्थी लिखित परीक्षा में उत्तीर्ण हुआ परन्तु मौखिक परीक्षा में फेल हो गया इसलिए उसे पैनल पर नहीं रखा गया , प्रार्थी को भारतीय रेल स्थापना नियम 1989 के पैरा 219 में निहित निर्देशों को ध्यान में रखते हुए ही पैनल पर नहीं रखा गया व मे.सी.एम.ए. के पद पर पदोन्नत नहीं किया गया । प्रार्थी

7. प्रार्थी का यह कथन कि देवीलाल को जे.सी.एम.ए. के पद पर पूर्व में नहीं लगाया गया अतः वह उससे कनिष्ठ था , माने जाने योग्य नहीं है क्योंकि सीणीयोरिटी लिस्ट में देवीलाल उससे वरिष्ठ था व प्रार्थीके जे.सी.एम.ए. पद पर एडहॉक कार्य करने से पूर्व की वरिष्ठता परिवर्तित नहीं होती । इस प्रकार प्रार्थी के करीब 10-11 वर्ष जे.सी. एम.ए. के पद पर एडहॉक कार्य करने से उसे न तो अन्य कर्मचारियों से वरिष्ठ माना जा सकता है न ही जे.सी.एम.ए. के पद पर बने रहने का उसका कोई अधिकार बनना माना जा सकता है क्योंकि उसकी नियुक्ति विशुद्ध रूप से एडहॉक व अस्थाई रूप से की गई थी व नियुक्ति आदेश दिनांक 25-2-83 में ही यह स्पष्ट किया गया था [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

307

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

अनुबंध

कि भविष्य में ऐसी पदोन्नति के लिए किसी प्रकार कोई अधिकार प्राप्त नहीं होगा ।

औद्योगिक विवाद अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय , जोधपुर पीठासीन अधिकारी : श्री पुष्पेन्द्रसिंह हाड़ा, आर.एच.जे.एस. औद्योगिक विवाद ( केन्द्रीय ) सं. 25/2002 मोहन सिंह पुत्र श्री सुलतान सिंह द्वारा ललित शर्मा , संयुक्त मंत्री, भारतीय मजदूर संघ , पाली मारबाड़ ( राज. )

...प्रार्थी

बनाम

डिवीजनल रेलवे मैनेजर, उत्तर रेलवे , जोधपुर

...अप्रार्थी

रेफरेन्स अर्न्तगत धारा 10 औ. वि. अधिनियम , 1947 उपस्थिति:-

( 1 ) श्री भुषणसिंह चारण प्रतिनिधी प्रार्थी

(2) श्री गिरीश तोखना प्रतिनिधि अप्रार्थी

अवार्ड

दिनांक 25-8-2007

8. प्रार्थी ने ए.आई.आर. 2000 एस.सी. 2808 के आधार पर यह तर्क लिया है कि इतने लम्बे समय तक कार्य करने से उसकी नियुक्ति एडहॉक नहीं मानी जा सकती । उक्त निर्णय में माननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय द्वारा देहली न्यायिक सेवा के तहत कार्यरत अधिकारियों के सम्बन्ध में उक्त सेवा नियमों का निर्वचन करते समय यह निर्णित किया था कि इस प्रकार की नियुक्तियां एडहॉक , स्टोपगेप नियुक्तियांमानी जा सकती हैं । इस प्रकरण की जो परिस्थिति है वह इस प्रकार की नहीं है कि प्रार्थी की नियुक्ति को एडहॉक नहीं माना जावे प्रार्थी के नियुक्ति आदेश में ही यह स्पष्ट है व प्रार्थी ने उस पर लागूसेवा नियमों का ऐसा कोई प्रावधान नहीं बताया है जिसके तहत इस प्रकार की एडहॉक नियुक्ति से उर्स कोई अधिकार उत्पन्न होता हो । ऐसी परिस्थिति में प्रार्थी की जे.सी.एम.ए. पद पर आदेश दिनांक 25-2-83 द्वारा की गई नियुक्ति विशुद्ध रूप से एडहॉक व अस्थाई मानी जा सकती है एवं सेवा नियमों के तहत परीक्षा व साक्षात्कार के बाद इस पद के लिए चूंकि प्रार्थी चयनित नहीं हुआ अतः यह नहीं माना जा सकता कि प्रार्थी का इस पद पर बने रहने का अधिकार था । ऐसी स्थिति में आदेश दिनांक 27-7-1994 द्वारा प्रार्थी को रिवर्ट किये जाने में कोई अवैधानिकता प्रकट नहीं होती ।

9. उपरोक्त विवेचन के अनुसार इस रेफरेन्स का उत्तर निम्न अवार्ड की टर्म्स में दिया जाता है ।

1. भारत सरकार ने अपनी अधिसूचना क्रमांक एल 41012/4/2002/ आई आर ( बी -1 ) दिनांक 19-6-2002 द्वारा निम्न विवाद अन्तर्गत धारा 10 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 के तहत इस न्यायालय को रेफर किया है :-

10. प्रार्थी को अप्रार्थीगण द्वारा जे.सी.एम.ए. पद से दिनांक 27-7-94 से लेब सहायक के पद पर पदावनत् किया जाना उचित एवं वैध था । प्रार्थी किसी अनुतोष का अधिकारी नहीं होगा ।

11. यह अवार्ड आज दिनांक 20-9-2007 को खुले न्यायालय में सुनाया गया ।

पुष्पेन्द्र सिंह हाड़ा, न्यायाधीश

" क्या मण्डल रेल प्रबन्धक , उत्तर रेलवे , जोधपुर द्वारा कर्मकार श्री मोहन सिंह पुत्र श्री सुलतान सिंह कटिवाला " स " लूनी जंकाम को उसके द्वारा केजूअल लेबर के रूप में की गई सेवाओं के बदले ग्रेडेड स्केल नहीं दिया जाना उचित एवं वैध है ? यदि नहीं तो कर्मकार अपने नियोजक से क्या राहत पाने का अधिकारी है ? י

नई दिल्ली , 27 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 125.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार नोर्दन रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण जोधपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 25/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को27-12-07 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -41012/04/2002- आईआर ( बी-1 ) ]

अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 27th December , 2007

S.O. 125. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 25/2002) of Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Jodhpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Northern Railways and their workmen , receivedby the Central Government on 27-12-2007.

[No. L-41012/04/2002- IR (B -I) ]

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

प्रार्थी ने अपना मांग- पत्र इस आशय का प्रस्तुत किया कि प्रार्थी की प्रारम्भिक नियुक्ति अप्रार्थी के समबड़ी केन्द्र पर पी.डब्ल्यू. आई. एवं ए.ई.एन. के अधीन मेन्टीनेन्स कार्य के लिए केजुअल लेबर के रूप में दिनांक 18-5-1970 को हुई । अप्रार्थी द्वारा प्रार्थी से 18-5-70 से 19-8-74 तक लगातार केजुअल लेबर के रूप में कार्य लिया । प्रार्थी द्वारा कार्य का विवरण भी मांग - पत्र में दिया गया है जिसके अनुसार वर्ष 1970 में 44 दिन , वर्ष 1971 में 47 दिन , वर्ष 1972में 276 दिन व वर्ष 1973 में 142 दिन तथा वर्ष 1974 में 183 दिन कार्य किया । अप्रार्थी के नियमों के अनुसार ग्रेडेड स्कूल प्राप्त करने के लिए केजुअल लेबर की न्यूनतम एवं आवश्यक कार्य करने की अवधि 120 दिन मेन्टीनेन्स वर्क के लिए व 180 दिन कन्सट्रक्शन वर्क के लिए है प्रार्थी ने मैन्टीनैन्स का कार्य किया है । प्रार्थी द्वारा न्यूनतम कार्य अवधि 120 दिन की थी जो प्रार्थी द्वारा वर्ष 1972 , वर्ष 1973 एवं वर्ष 1974 में की है , जिसका इन्द्राज केजुअल लेबर कार्ड एवं सेवा रिकोर्ड में है । अप्रार्थी द्वारा प्रार्थी के साथ कार्य करने वाले अन्य कनिष्ठ कर्मचारियों को नियोजन में स्थायी कर ग्रेडेड स्केल दे दिया है लेकिन प्रार्थी को बावजूद निवेदन के उक्त ग्रेडेड स्केल नहीं 308

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

को 180 दिन पूरे करने पर ग्रेडेड स्केल रेलवे के नियमानुसार देय था जो उसे नहीं दिया गया, प्रार्थी 120 दिन पूरे कर चुका था । दिया है । प्रार्थी अप्रार्थी के अधीन 30 वर्ष से अधिक अवधि की सेवा पूर्ण कर चुका है । अतः प्रार्थी को केजुअल लेबर के रूप में की गई सेवा का लाभ देते हुए ग्रेडेड स्केल दिये जाने का आदेश पारित किया जावे व एरियर राशि ब्याज सहित प्रार्थी को दिलाये जाने का अवार्ड पारित किया जावे ।

8. इसके विपरीत अप्रार्थी नियोजक रेलवे की ओर से यह तर्क लिया गया है कि प्रार्थी ने अपने क्लेम ग्रहण को परिपत्र संख्या 7850 सं. 220ई/ 190- III ई -4 दिनांक 30-6-81 पर आधारित किया है जब कि प्रार्थी को इससे पूर्व 17-10-80 को ही रेगुलर कर दिया गया था अतः यह परिपत्र प्रार्थी के कैस में लागू नहीं किया जा सकता । प्रार्थी का मामला परिपत्र संख्या 1731 दिनांक 31-8-1962 के अन्र्तगत आता है जिसके अनुसार 180 दिन या 6 माह लगातार सेवा करने के उपरान्तकेजुअल लेवर की ग्रेडेड स्केल देय होता है । प्रार्थी द्वारा उक्त अवधि, में लगातार 180 दिन कार्य नहीं किया गया अतः उसे ग्रेडेड स्केल नहींदिया गया । इस प्रकार 180 दिन की उक्त आवश्यकता को मुद्रित परिपत्र संख्या 5949'सर्कुलर नम्बर 220- ई /190 ईआईवी दिनांक 31-7-1973 से 180 दिन कम करते हुए 120 दिन की कार्य सेवा पूर्ण होने पर ग्रेडेड स्केल देय होना माना गया परन्तु प्रार्थी ने 12-7-73 के पश्चात् बिना ब्रेक के सेवा नहीं की थी अतः इस परिपत्र के अनुसार भी प्रार्थी को ग्रेडेड स्केल देय नहीं था ।

9. केजुअल लेबर को रेलवे में ग्रेडेड स्केल देने या टेम्प्रेरी माने जाने के सम्बय में जो परिषत्र अप्रार्थी विभाग द्वारा प्रस्तुत किया गया है उनमें सीरीयल नम्बर 1731 पर प्रकाशित परिपत्र संख्या 220- ई/ 190-1 (ई.आई.वी. ) दिनांक 31-8-1962 / 1-9-1962 द्वारा छः महीने की लगातार सेवा केजुअल लेबर द्वारा किये जाने की स्थिति में टेम्प्रेरी (temporary) माने जाने के निर्देश दिये गये व इन निर्देशों में सीरीयल नम्बर 5949 पर प्रकाशित अन्य परिपत्र संख्या 220 ई/ 190- III ( ई. आई.वी. ) दिनांक 31-7-1973 में रेलवे बोर्ड द्वारा संशोधन किया गया कि 180 दिन के बजाए चार महीने लगातार सेवा पर केजुअल लेबर को टेम्प्रेरी भाना जाएगा । इस प्रकार 120 दिन लगातार कार्य दिवस होने की स्थिति में केजुअल लेबर को टेम्प्रेरी माने जाने का आदेश दिनांक 31-7-73 के परिपत्र से लागू हो चुका था । अतः अप्रार्थी नियोजक का यह तर्क उचित नहीं है कि इसके बाद के परिपत्र दिनांक 30-6-81- द्वारा इस सम्बन्ध में कोई संशोधन किया जाकर नई 3. अप्रार्थी की ओर से जवाब में कहा गया है कि प्रार्थी को रेलवे में नेमेतिक श्रमिक के रूप में 18-5-70 को पी.डब्ल्यू.आई. /ए, ई.एन. समदड़ी के अधीन लगाया गया । प्रार्थी ने जो कार्य दिवस मांग- पंफेत्र में दर्शाये हैं उससे स्पष्ट है कि उसकी कार्य अवधि लगातार नहींहै। प्रार्थी की कोई भी कार्य अवधि 12-7-73 से पूर्व निरन्तर 180 दिन या इससे अधिक नहीं है । प्रार्थी द्वारा 12-7-73 के पश्चात् 120 दिन या इससे अधिक निरन्तर कार्य नहीं किया है ।परिपत्र सं. 7850 जून 1981 में जारी किया गया , सन् 1981 के पूर्व ही प्रार्थी को 17-10-80 से रेगुलर कर दिया गया था अतः उक्त परिपत्र प्रार्थी के मामले में लागू नहीं होता , प्रार्थी का मामला परिपत्र सं. 1731 के अन्तर्गत आता है। जिसके निर्देशानुसार 180 दिन/06 माह लगातार सेवा करने के उपरान्त मेमेतिक श्रमिक को ग्रेडेड स्कूल देय होता है । परिपत्र सं. 5949 रेलवे बोर्ड द्वारा दिनांक 12-7-73 को 180 दिन लगातार कार्य दिवसों को कम करते हुए 120 दिन लगातार कार्य दिवस की सेवा पूर्ण होने पर ग्रेडेड स्कूल देय होता है , प्रार्थी ने चूंकि 12-7-73 के पश्चात् भी 120 दिन लगातार सेवा नहीं की अतः उक्त परिपत्रके अनुसार भी प्रार्थी को ग्रेडेड स्कूल देय नहीं है । प्रार्थी ने किसी श्रमिक का नाम नहीं बताया है जिसे ग्रेडेड स्कूल दिया गया है । प्रार्थी द्वारा ग्रेडेड स्केल की पात्रता पूर्ण नहीं की अतः उसे ग्रेडेड स्कूल प्रदान नहीं किया गया । प्रार्थी को 17-10-80 को नियमित नियुक्ति प्रदान की गई तथा नियमित नियुक्ति तिथि से नियमित स्केल दे दी गई व अगली वार्षिक वेतन वृद्धियाँ भी प्रार्थी को समय समय पर दी गई तथा पदोन्नतियां भी दी गई , वर्तमान में प्रार्थी नियमित उटि वाले पद पर लूनी जेक्शन पर कार्यरत् है । प्रार्थी किसी अनुतोष का अधिकारी नहींहै । प्रार्थी का मांग- पत्र सव्यय खारिज किया जावे ।

कोई व्यवस्था की गई हो बल्कि परिपत्र संख्या 7850 सं. 220ई/ 190- XII ( ई-4 ) दिनांक 30-6-81 द्वारा पूर्व के परिपत्रों को कन्सोलीडेट किया जाकर पूर्व के परिपत्रों में क्या नियम है यही बताया गया।

4. मांग-पत्र के समर्थन में प्रार्थी ने स्वयं को शपथ- पत्र प्रस्तुत किया जिस पर अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधी द्वारा जिरह की गई तथा अप्रार्थी की ओर से पी. सी . व्यास सहायक मंडल इंजीनियर का शपथ -पत्र प्रस्तुत किया जिस पर प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधी द्वारा जिरह की गई ।

5. दोनों पक्षों के प्रतिनिधीगण की बहस सुनी गई । पत्रावली काअवलोकन किया ।

6. प्रार्थी ने अपने मांग- पत्र के पैरा संख्या-4 में उसके द्वारा केजुअल लेवर के रूप में 18-5-70 से 19-8-74 तक किये गये कार्य दिवसों का विवरण दिया है । अप्रार्थी नियोजक द्वारा इसके जवाब में यह स्वीकार किया गया है कि प्रार्थी द्वारा जो कार्य दिवस मांग- पत्र के पैरा संख्या -4 में बताये गये हैं उसमें कोई विवाद नहीं है । इस प्रकार प्रार्थी द्वारा जो कार्य अवधि बताई गई है वह स्वीकृत तथ्य है ।

7. प्रार्थी ने अपनी साक्ष्य में उक्त कार्य अवधि के आधार पर यह कहा है कि ग्रेडेड स्केल प्राप्त करने के लिए मेन्टीनेन्स कार्य करने वाले केजुअल लेवर को 120 दिन व कन्स्ट्रकशन कार्य वाले केजुअल लेवर

10. इस प्रकार प्रार्थी का केस परिपत्र सं. 5948 सर्कुलर नं. 743ई/39 , ( ई.आई.वी ) दिनांक 31-7-1973 से शासित होता है जिसके अनुसार 120 दिन या चार महीने की लगातार सेवा पर केजुअल लेबर को टेम्प्रेरी माने जाने के निर्देश दिये गये थे । प्रार्थी 31-7-73 को केजुअल लेबर के रूप में नियोजित था , जैसा मॉग- पत्र के पैरा -4 में दिये गये विवरण से स्पस्ट है परन्तु 31-7-73 को या इसके बाद 19-8-74 तक उसके द्वारा जो कार्यदिवस बताये गये हैं उसमें सारी सेवा टुकडों में की गई है लगातार 120 दिन की सेवा किया जाना प्रार्थी स्वयं द्वारा दिये गये विवरण से ही प्रकट नहीं होता । रेलवे बोर्ड द्वारा जो परिपत्र जारी किये गये हैं उनमें स्पष्ट रूप से यह बताया गया है कि कौन सा सर्विस ब्रेक, ब्रेक नहीं माना जायेगा ऐसे में बीमारी के कारण अनुपस्थिति या स्वीकृति ली जाकर 20 दिन तक की अनुपस्थिति को ब्रेक नहीं माना गया ( परिपत्र सं. 7850 ) परन्तु प्रार्थी की सेवा में [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) )

ब्रेक इन कारणों से हो न तो ऐसी साक्ष्य है व ब्रेक की जो अवधि है वह उक्त बताई गई अवधि से ज्यादा अवधि की है । ऐसी स्थिति में 120 दिन की लगातार सेवा नहीं होने के कारण उक्त परिपत्रों के तहत प्रार्थी ग्रेडेड स्केल की पात्रता नहीं रखता था । प्रार्थी ने यह तर्क भी लिया है कि उसके साथ कार्य कर रहे अन्य मजदूरों को यह स्केल दे दिया गया परन्तु इसका कोई विवरण प्रार्थी द्वारा नहीं दिया गया है जिससे यह पता नहीं चलता कि अन्य मजदूरों को जिन्हें ऐसा स्केल दिया गया या नहीं व उनके द्वारा किये गये कार्य दिवसों की संख्या या प्रवृति क्या थी। अतः प्रार्थी का यह तर्क माने जाने योग्य है। नहीं है।

309

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO . CGIT/LC/ R/ 165/2000

Presiding Officer : Shri C. M. Singh

Shri Toaran Lal Deshmukh ,

S/o Sh . Babulal Deshmukh ,

Vill: Suregaon , PO : Suregaon ,

Teh: Dondi- Lohara ,

Workman Durg (M.P.)

Versus

The Branch Manager ,

State Bank of India,

SuregaonBranch ,

Suregaon, Tehsil : Dondi - Lohara,

Durg(MP)

11. यहाँयह भी उल्लेखनीय है कि प्रार्थी को यदि ग्रेडेड स्कूल सन् 73 के बाद से ही देय था तो उसे शीघ्रता शीघ्र यह श्रम विवाद उठाना चाहिए था जबकि प्रार्थी द्वारा यह विवाद करीब 27 वर्ष बाद उठाया गया है , इतनी इनओर्डीनिएट देरी के बाद इस प्रकार का विवाद उठाये जाने से रेफरेन्स किये जाते समय श्रम विवाद विद्यमान होना नहीं माना जा सकता। प्रार्थी इस आधार पर भी कोई अनुतोष पाने का अधिकारी नहींहै ।

12. उक्त विवेचन के अनुसार इस रेफरेन्स का उत्तर इस अवार्ड की टर्म्स में निम्न प्रकार दिया जाता है:

13. अप्रार्थी नियोजक द्वारा प्रार्थी को उसके द्वारा केजुअल लेबर के रूप में की गई सेवाओं के बदले ग्रेडेड स्केल नहीं दिया जाना उचित एवं वैध था । प्रार्थी किसी अनुतोष का अधिकारी नहीं होगा । 14. यह अवार्ड आज दिनांक 25-8-2007 को खुले न्यायालय में सुनाया गया ।

पुष्पेन्द्र सिंह हाड़ा , न्यायाधीश नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 126.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 165/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-12-07 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -12012/224/2000- आईआर ( बी-1 ) ]

अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 27th December, 2007 S.O. 126. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 165/ 2000) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur , as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India, and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 27-12-2007

[No. L- 12012/224/2000- IR (B - I ) ]

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

Management

AWARD

Passed on this 12th day of December, 2007 1.TheGovernment of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L- 12012 /224/2000 /IR(B- I) dated 19-20/9/2000 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this Sribunal :

"Whether refusal of employment to Shri Toaran Lal Deshmukh S/o Shri Babulal Deshmukh w.e.f. 11-6-95 bythe management of State Bank of India is justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ? " 2.Videorder dated 9-1-06 passed on the ordersheet of this reference proceeding , the reference proceeded ex parte against the workman Shri Toaran Lal Deshmukh .

3. The case of the workman in brief is as follows :- That the workman was engaged as Messenger on daily wagesw.e.f. 12-2-90 to 31-5-91 by the Management in place ofthe thenMessenger Shri Laxman Prasad Yadav due to hisailment/sickness . Shri Laxman Prasad Yadav took voluntary retirement in the month ofApril 1991. From the month of June 1991 , workman has been employed as canteen boy on monthly wages of Rs . 350 in Suregaon branch of the State Bank of India, Suregaon . Apart from the job of canteen boy , the workman was also performing duties of messenger as no messenger was appointed on retirement ofShri Laxman Prasad Yadav. That from 11-6-95, the workman has been discontinued from service without any reason at all . That from the date of his appointment w.e.f. 12-2-90, the workman has been working regularly andworked for more than 240 days every year. At the time of his retrenchment , the workman was not given one month's notice or salary in lieu thereof and thus the management has violated the mandatory provisions of Sec- 25- F(a) &(b) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Therefore the action of the management in discontinuing the service ofworkman is illegal and void ab initio . The workman is entitled to reinstatement in service with back wages with all consequential benefits .

310

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] THE, GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008 /PAUSA 29 , 1929

दिल्ली, के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई डी सं. 58/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-07 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -30011 / 1/2007- आईआर ( एम.) ] एन .. एस. बोरा , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 31st Deqember, 2007

S.O. 127. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. I.D. No. 58/2007) of Central Government.Industrial Tribunal -Cum- Labour Court II , New Delhi , now as shown in the Annexure inthe industrial dispute between the employers in relation tothe management of IOCL , & Love Castings & Fabricators pvt . Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 31-12-2007;

[No. L-30011/ 1 /2007 - IR(M) ]

N. S. BORA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT - II, NEW DELHI 4. The management filed their Written Statement . Their case inbrief is as follows: In January, 1990, the services ofworkman were taken intermittently for cleaning the bank premises and fetching drinking water . It was a part timejob for which the workman was paid Rs . 5 per day. When the workman was required to fetch water from a distant place , he was paid Rs . 16 per day. This amount was as per the rate agreed by the workman to do the above job . It is wrong to say that the workman was engaged on daily wages continuously . That as a measure of welfare , the management provides canteen , recreation and library facilities to its employees . These facilities are not provided under any legal provision . The facility of canteen is being maintained by the Local Implementation Committee which isformed by the members of the officers as well as employees working in the Branch/office . The management has no control over the affairs of the said cornmittee . The said committee from its own fund pays their remuneration to their employees . The Bank has no right of supervision of the employees of the Committee/Canteen. Thus there existed no employee -employer relationship between the workmen and the Bank and under the above facts and circumstances , the workman is not entitled to any relief.

PRESIDING OFFICER: R. N. Rai

ID . No. 58/2007

In the matter of:

5. As the case proceeded ex parte against the workman, no evidence has been adduced on behalf of workman. The management did not adduce any evidence because the workman failed to adduce any evidence for establishing his case .

6. I have heard Shri Vijay Tripathi , Advocate for the management .

Shri Uma Mandal , C/o ThePresident, Petroleum Mazdoor Union , C/o CPWD Workers ' Union , Sector: IV, R.K. Puram, New Delhi - 110022 .

Versus

7. It is a no evidence case . Thus the workman has failed to prove his case . Under the circumstances , the reference deserves to be decided in favour of management and against workman without any orders as to costs .

1. The Sr. Plant Manager, IOCL , LPG Botteling Plant, Madanpur Khadar , New Delhi - 110076.

2.M/s.Love Castings & Fabricators Pvt . Ltd ; JA/ 12/ 8 , Ashok Vihar , New Delhi - 110052 :

AWARD

8. In view of the above , the reference is decided in favour ofthe management and against the workman without any orders as to costs holding that the refusal of employment to Shri Toaran Lal Deshmuk S /o Shri Babulal Deshmukh w.e.f. 11-6-95 by the management of State Bank of India is justified and consequently the workman is not entitled to any relief.

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L-30011 / 12007 - IR ( M ) Central Government Dt . 11-10-2007 has referred the following point for adjudication .

9. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment asper rules.

The point runs as hereunder :

C. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 31 दिसम्बर , 2007

"Whether the termination of the workman Sh . Uma Mandal on 09-05-2005 by M/s . Luv Castings & Fabricators Private Limited contractor of IOCL , LPG Bottling Plant, Madanpur Khadar, New Delhi is just and legal? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled and from which party (parties) . "

का.आ. 127.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार आई ओ सी एल एवं लव कास्टिंग और फेबरिकेशन प्रा. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय II , नई

It transpires from perusal of the order sheet that the reference was received on 17-10-2007 . The workman was directed to file claim on 20-11-2007 and 04-12-2007 . Last 311 भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29, 1929

[भाग II--खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

_pportunity was given for filing elaim statement but the workman applicant has not filed claim statement.

No dispute award is given .

4.The Chairman/MD, HSIDC, Vanijaya Nikunj, HSIDC Office Complex, Phase -V, Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon, Haryana.

AWARD

Let copies of the Award be sent to the Ministry of Labour, Government of India for necessary action at their end.

Date: 18-12-2007

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L. 29012/5/ 2005-IR(M) Ceneral Government Dt. 27-04-2005 has referred thefollowing point for adjudication .

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer

The point runs as hereunder:

नई दिल्ली , 31 दिसम्बर , 2007

"Whether the action of the management of Haryana Minerals Limited in terminating the services of Sh . S. D. Dubey without paying legal dues simultaneously w.e.f. 03-03-2003 is legal and just ? If not, towhat relief the workman is entitled to?" का.आ. 128. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार हरियाणा मिनरल लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय II , नई दिल्ली ,जोधपुर के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या आई डी सं. 31/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-07 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -29012/5 /2005- आईआर ( एम ) ]

एन. एस. बोरा , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 31st December , 2007

Theworkman applicant has- filed claim statement. In the claim statement it has been stated that workman was working under the respondent No.3 as a Dy . Mining Engineer. However, the nature ofjob which the workman was performing with the respondent no . 3 was of such nature that workman is well covered under the definitionof workman as defined in section 2(s) ofthe ID Act, 1947. The designation of the workman as per the Mines Act, 1952 does not bring the workman into the ambit of Mines Manager. The workman was not carrying on any managerial and administrative functions independently.

S.O. 128. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. I.D. No. 31/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- Cum- Labour Court - II , New Delhi , as shown in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Haryana Minerals Limited , and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on31-12-2007

[F. No. L- 29012/5/2005 - IR(M) ]

N. S. BORA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

That the respondent no.1 , State of Haryana had decided to close down the respondent no. 3 department, which is the entity of state in the year 2002. Most of the staff of the respondent no. 3 department was retrenched andwas paid compensation as per their salary etc. which is thematter ofrecord . However , some of the employees like the present workman were not paid any retrenchment compensation at the time of their retrenchment by the respondent.

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT - IL, NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER: R. N. Rai.

ID. No. 31/2005

IN THE MATTER OF:

Shri S.D. Dubey,

Sainipura, Taoru , Gurgaon (Haryana)

That the respondent no.1 is responsible for all acts and omissions of respondent no 3 because respondent no. 3 is the entity of the state and is well covered under the definition of state as per the Constitution of India . The respondent no. 2 is a Divisional Commissioner ofGurgaon and is also, Chairman of the respondent no . 3/HML. The respondent no . 4 hastaken over all the assets and liabilities ofthe respondent no. 3 is responsible to pay all the dues etc.Which are due to the former employees including the workman.

VERSUS

That on 03-03-2003 respondent no . 3 retrenched the service of the present workman and paid no compensation tothe workman . The HSIDC/respondent no. 4 had taken over all the assets and liabilities of the respondent no. 3 . The respondent no . 4 had released the amount of Rs.1.68 crores to the respondent no.3 to meet out its needs etc. The respondent no. 3 and the other respondents are avoiding to make the appropriate payment to the workman andtheyare practicing and are discriminating between the workman and others. Because the respondent has paid the 1. State ofHaryana, through Chief Secretary, Chandigarh . 2. The Commissioner , Gurgaon Division ( as a Chairman , HML) , Haryana. 3. The Managing Director , HML, Phase - 5 , Udyog Vihar , HSIDC Complex, Gurgaon , Haryana.

62G1/08-20 312

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

compensation on the name of retrenchment etc. to some of theworkman whose names are provided below:

1. Sh . Kuldeep Singh , Asstt . Manager ( Quality Control ) . He was retrenched in December , 2000 and was paidretrenchment compensation.

2. Sh. Ghanshyam Singh , Supervisor.

3. Sh . Narishmanlu - Surveyor

4. Sh . Duli Chand Yadav - Technical Assistant .

That the respondents on the one hand had retrenched the services of most of the workers but had retained many selected workman and had allowed them to work inthedifferent department. The list of such workman isgivenbelow.

(a) Sh . R.D. Sharma (Steno) .

(b ) Sh . Ajit Singh and Katar Singh (Account Assistant) .

These three officials are working in the Mewat DevelopmentAuthority at present.

(c).Sh . Zile, Singh (PA), Sh . Suresh Chand (Driver), Sh. Sukhbir Singh (Driver). These three officials are working at Haryana Bhawan , Delhi, Sh. Jagdish is working in Marketting Department , at Narnaul , Smt. Darshna Devi is working at D.C. Office , Rohtak and Sh . P.K. Saxena (Production Manager ) is working at Statistical Office, Chandigark and Sh. Rajender Phogat (Secretary) is working at MDA, Nuh , Sh . V.S. Chhokar ( Assistant Account Officer)- in the Statistical Office, Gurgaon , Sh. V.S. Dhiloo (Draughtsman), Sh . Katar Singh, Account Assistant is now, working at MDĄ Nuh . This all shows that these officials are provided alternate employment by the respondent in the variousdepartment. But on the other hand applicant is neither paid any due , retrenchment compensation nor being provided any alternate employment by the respondent . This isdiscriminatory practice on the part of the respondent. The copy of the complaint which was filed before theALC on16-07-2004 during the conciliation proceedings with all above details is annexed as Annexure A-1 .

That on one hand the respondent no.1 had closed down the commercial business of respondent no. 3 and retrenched most of the employees but provided alternate job to some selected few workman without taking any prior permission for closure of respondent no . 3 from the appropriate Gevernment i.e. Central Government . There were more than 600 workmen working in the respondent no.3. The present workman was not paid any compensation due tohim underthe ID Act, 1947 at the time of his alleged retrenchment on 03-03-2003. The copy of the said order is annexed as Annexure A - 2.

That the workman filed one demand notice before ALC Centre, Faridabad under the ID Act in August , 2003 . The respondent no. 3 and 4 appeared before the ALCduring the conciliation proceedings and filed the reply. The said respondents denied all the averments made by the workman

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] and filed the false and fabricated reply before the ALC. The respondents stated in the reply the respondents are ready to consider the genuine demands raised by the workman provided the necessary documents are given to the respondents . But it is pertinent to mention here that the workman has provided all the documents to the respondents as notice were issued to them and all the documents were supplied . The copy of the demand notice dated13-08-2003 along with annexure and the reply ofthe respondents are filed hereto as Annex - A - 3 & A -4 .

That the action of the management for non -payment of retrenchment compensation as per the ID Act and as per the other provisions of the law is illegal . On the other hand the discrimination for providing alternate employment to the applicant is also illegal on the part of the respondent . The respondent has afso not paid the 33 days payment in lieu of excess/extra work in lieu of2/4 Saturday and general holidays for the year 1999 to 2000 ( for two years) . It is pertinent to mention here that the Board of respondent no. 3had taken the decision that the workmen were working onthe operation duties like the present workman shall be paid 33 days payment in lieu of extra duties performed by them in lieu of 2/4 Saturdays and general holidays .

That the respondents are not law abiding persons . Because already one order under gratuity act for payment ofRs . 50 , 359/- was passed with the 10% interest by the ALC/RLC on 06-04-2004 but in spite of execution proceedings filed against the respondent by the workman , the respondent are not paying the said due amount to him . Likewise the respondent are also not paid the due amount ofthe CPFto the tune of Rs . 24, 057/- in spite of order passed by APFC , Gurgaon on 28-06-2004.

That the workman is entitled to receive due T A and other permissible dues to the workman in spite of several representation and legal notices served on the respondents time to time. This shows the attitude of respondent no. 3 and 4 is discriminatory. Since the workman is not paid due retrenchment compensation and he is not providing with alternate employment as same is already provided to the similarly placed workmen, the action of respondents of retrenchment is illegal and malafide . The workman is liable to be reinstated with full back wages either in the res- pondent no . 3 or in any other department of respondent no.1 with alternate employment which is provided by the respondent to other persons/ former HML employees .

In the above premises and in the interest of justice , equity and fair play most respectfully it is prayed that as the alleged retrenchment dated 03-03-2003 of the workman isillegal , the respondent may kindly be directed to reinstate the workman in the respondent department/ respondent no . 3 or in any other appropriate department of the respondent no.1 with full back wages and interest @ 9% pa on said amounts from the date of workman's illegal retrenchment till payment of same to him with continuity of service.

313 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

so his services were terminated in terms of appointment letter being surplus and he is not a worker covered under IDAct, 1947. Since the company is facing financial crisis so cannot afford any facility. The apex court has given its findings to this effect in plethora of cases.

The management has filed written statement. In the writtenstatement it has been stated that the petitioner was in supervisory capacity and was performing managerial and administrative functions and was paid for the same hence not covered under the definition of workman , therefore the petition of the above said applicant is to be dismissed.

That the plaintiff has no right to assess the defendants as not law abiding person . The point is strongly objected to . The process of law, which is available to other person is also available to respondents as well. In other words, the plaintiff wants to defame the respondent stating the version which have no relevancy to the present claim. The company has challenged both the issues before the higher statutory authorities and will be finalized in due course oftime..

That the officer was in supervisory capacity as such was carrying managerial and administrative functions .His services are not covered under ID Act, 1947. Since due to shrinkage in business the post of the official fall surplus so hisservices were terminated in terms of his appointment letter by giving 3 months salary in lieu of notice period as such no retrenchment benefit is payable.

Thatbeing an officer in managerial capacity he was paid the dues , payable to him in term of his appointment letter. No due is payable to him at this stage . If there is any dues pending, then specific amount and head be given . The management is always ready to accede the legitimate demand.

Evidence of both the parties has been taken.

Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.

That the defendant company is a incorporated under the companies act having separate legal entity and the liabilities ofthe promoters are limited. No one else in person who so ever he may be is liable to make payment of companies dues . No asset/liability of the company had been taken over by any after agency . Though the company hasstopped all kind ofactivities , yet is handling its residual work itself.

It was submitted from the side ofthe applicant that he is aworkman under Section 2 (s) ofthe ID Act, 1947. The designation of the workman as per the Mining Act, 1952 does not bring the workman into the ambit of Mines Manager. He was not carrying on any managerial or administrative functions .

Itwas submitted from the side of the management that the applicant was performing duty in supervisory capacity.He is not covered u/s 2 (s) ofthe ID Act, 1947. He has been paid dues in view of his appointment letter .

That all the submissions made are wrong , misconceived, misleading and are denied. The plaintiff is neither workman nor any retrenchment benefit is payable to him . He was in supervisory capacity and his services being surplus have been terminated after giving him 3months salary in lieu ofnotice period as per the conditions ofappointment . No other agency have taken over any asset/ liability of the company. The company itself is handling its residual work.

It isthe duty ofthe management to prove by cogent documentary evidence that the workman performed managerial or supervisoty duty. The management should produce documents regarding the managerial and supervisory capacity.

The workman has been issued appointment letter on 20-7-1993. He has been. given the designation of Dy. Mining Engineer and he has appointed in the Pay Scale of Rs . 2000-3200 . His services have been terminated on 03-03-2003 in view of closure of mining operation due to surrender of Alipur Mines , State Government of Haryana as his services were found surplus .

That the company has retrenched all its employees and no one has been retained. If any person have sought other employment some whereelse, then that is form his own efforts and company has nothing to say in this regard . Every person including the plaintiff are at liberty to seek altemate employment . Since he is not a workman so his services were terminated being surplus in view of terms amd condition laid down in appointment documents .

He has been paid 3 months pay in terms of his, appointment letter. It has been mentioned in the appointment letter that even after confirmation; his services. may be terminated with 3 months notice either on other side or pay in lieu thereof.

That since the company has sustained heavy loss and was not in a position to pay even statutory dues , such as royalty, PF dues etc. So the management decided to close down the activities ofthe company . Further Supreme Court has also banned the mining acitivities along with Delhi Mathura highway.

That since the respondent company winded up its operations , so is not in a position to provide altemate employment. Since the plaintiffwas in managerial capacity,

It has not been pointed out as to what managerial duty, the workman performed. No duty chart has been filed assigning to the workman duty in managerial or supervisory capacity . The duty of Dy . Mining Engineer is 314

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

NewDelhi, the 31st December, 2007 operational.He may incidently perform managerial dutles . Inthe MinesAct, the office of the Dy . Mining Engineer has not beendefined as managerial or supervisory.

S.O. 129. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. I.D. No. 59/2003) ofCentral Government Industrial Tribunal -Cum- Labour-Court, II , New Delhi, now as shown in the industrial disputebetweenthe management of IOCL, New Delhi , and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 31-12-2007

[No. L-30011/100/2002 -IR (M)] N. S. BORA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

Themanagement has to prove that the workman was competenttowatch over the work ofthe juniors and submit reports regarding their work in managerial or administrative office. Theremust be some sub -ordinate employees as the administrator has the power to inspect the work of those subordinate and submit confidential reports to the higher authorities. It is for the management to prove that the workmanhas been assigned managerial duty. The workman cannot be saidto be a manager or administrator in view of thenomenclature given to him . The work ofa Engineer is always operational.

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT -II NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER; R. N. RAL. ID . No. 59/2003

IN THE MATTER OF:

Thereal tests for ascertaining the status and function ofemployee are the primary, basic or dominant nature of duties. Thewords managerial or supervisory have to be understood intheir proper connotation and there mere use dannot bedetracted from the truth.

Shri Prakash & & Others, S/o. Shri Ramcharan, R/o . C/B - 328 , Anna Nagar, TilakBridge, New Delhi - 110002 . VERSUS

In (1985) 3 SCC371 it has been held that the nature of the work of a workman is to be ascertained from the dominant nature ofduties performed by him and not by nomenclature. In view ofthisjudgment ofthe Hon'ble Apex Court the claimant is a workman . This point is decided accordingly.

IndianOil Corporation Limited, Through Chairman- cum - Managing Director, Scope Complex, Core - II , Lodhi Road, NewDelhi .

The applicant in the instant case is a workman and he is entitled to get 15 days wages for every completed year.He is not entitled to get any other relief.

AWARD

The reference is replied-thus:

TheMinistry ofLabour by its letter No. L -30011 / 100/ 2002-IR(M) Central GovernmentDt . 07-04-2003 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The point runs as hereunder:

Theaction ofthe management of Haryana Minerals Limited in terminating the services of Sh . S.D. Dubey without paying legal dues simultaneously w.e. f. 03-03-2003 is neither legal norjust. The workman is entitled to 15 days wages( last drawn) for every completed year of service in view ofSection 25 F ofthe ID Act, 1947 within two months fromthe date ofthe publication of the award.

Thaward is given accordingly.

R. N. RAI , PresidingOfficer

"Whether the action of the management of IOCL , New Delhi in not regularizing the services of concerned 16 workmen from the date of their initial appointment is just, fair and legal ? If not, to what reliefthe concerned workmen are entitled and from which date?"

नई दिल्ली , 31 दिसम्बर , 2007

का आ. 129.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 को 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आई. ओ. सी. एल. , नई दिल्ली के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय II , नई दिल्ली,के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आई डी सं. 59/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-07 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[फा. सं. एल-30011/100/2002- आईआर (एम) ]

एन. एस. बोरा , डेस्क अधिकारी

The petitioners have filed claim petition . In the claim petition they have stated that they were engaged and employed as contract labour employees in the office/units ofthe respondent In the category of the Cleaner , Helper , Electrician, Lineman- tele -technician, Supervisor, Plumber and Cook under contractors who changed from time to time. That these persons have been employed by respondent on contract basis through contractors who keep changing and have infast changed many times in past as contract with a particular contractor is for a limited period, but in view of the fact that the nature of the work being rendered by the petitioners are permanent , their services have been continued all through irrespective of the change of the contractor .

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

The detail of the petitioners including their status the initial year of working and the contractors withwhom they were employed lastly are set out hereinbelow: - Name

315

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

Name of contractor

InitialYr. ofEmp. &Nature ofWork

M/s. Cosmo Const .

Sushil Kr . 1988 (Telephone LinemanHelper) Co.

Ramesh

M/ s . Sirohi Engg .

1984 (Safaikaramchari)

Prakash

M/ s . Sirohi Engg .

1987 (Safaikaramchari)

Harcharan 1990 (Safaikaramchari ) M/s . Sirohi Engg .

M/s. Cosmo Const. Co. Rajesh 1990(Helper-Elect.)

Ramesh 1988 (Helper-Elect. ) M/s . Cosmo Con . Co. GulamHussain

Khan

M/s. Cosmo Con . Co. 1988 (Plumber)

Amit

M/s. Sirohi Engg.

1993 (Supervisor- Cleaning)

Arumugam 1988 (Cook)

Mr.VipinAgarwal Itissubmitted that the respondent being the Principal employer has got ultimate control over the employees who were recruited through or at the behest of the labour contractor . It is not the contractor but the principal employers under whose guidelines and supervision the contract labour employees performed their respectivejobs .

That the Central Government vide notification No.S.O.779(E) dated 09-12-1976 has abolished the contract labour for sweeping , cleaning , dusting and watching of buildings owned and occupied by the establishments in respect of which the appropriate government is Central Government.

That the engagement of the petitioners on contract basis for the work of respondent which is of perennial nature is perverse , illegal , malafide and arbitrary and in contravention of the notification dated 09-12-1976 prohibiting engagement of contract labour for sweeping , cleaning and dusting etc. The petitioners shall invite attention ofthis Hon ' ble Tribunal/ Court to the provisions ofSection 10 of the CLRA Act , 1970.

That the petitioners submits that the object of the aforementioned act is to prohibit exploitation of contract labour at the behest of the employer/management by adopting such method and devices to over reach the various provisions of the labour and other related Acts ..

That the respondent by employing the workmen/ petitioner through contractors have deprived the workmen not only the right pay and emoluments which they are legally entitled to, but also the right of security of service . The petitioners employed through contractors have been deprived ofvarious benefits like leave , paid holidays , HRA, Cycle allowance and various other allowances , like loan facilities , promotional avenues , timely payment of salaries etc. It is high time that the contract labour system is completely abolished , prohibited and eliminated and the petitioners employed as contract labourers should be deemed to be regular employees of the respondent with all rights and facilities as is available to their counterpart employees employed directly by the principal employers onpermanent basis .

That the petitioners submit that the work against which they are employed is of permanent nature and is incidental to the day to day main work of the respondent . It is also submitted that the nature of work in which the petitioners are employed is of perennial nature and is available throughout the year . It is also submitted that the work inwhich the petitioners are employed are in existence since the establishments of the respondent and there was no occasion when such work was not required by the respondent. It is submitted that for identical jobs which the petitioners are doing , the respondent have employed directly and are paid regular pay scales with all other facilities admissible to regular employees . There is no justification on the part of the respondent to employ the petitioners as contract labour . By keeping the petitioners as contract labour instead of treating them their regular employees the respondent is perpetuating unfair labour practice.

That a representation was made on behalf of the petitioner by their union to the respondent from 12-09-1997 to abolish the contract labour system in respect ofthejobs in which the petitioners are working and to treat them as regularly employed persons. The respondents have to taken any action on the said representation till date.

That the petitioners submit that the respondent after the petitioners have moved the judicial machinery for their regularization etc. have adopted mala fide tactics to throw the petitioner out ofjob on the account of expiry of some contracts. The petitioners have been kept in dark regarding such expiry of contract . It is submitted that the petitioners were told that they should be prepared to face the consequences of unemployment as they had approached the courts for their regularization .

That the action of the respondent in not regularizing the services of the petitioners , nor in abolishing the employment through the contractors and ultimately dispensing with the services of the petitioners are unconstitutional , arbitrary, illegal , opposed to the public policy and against the public interest, violatíve of Articles 14, 21 , 38 , 41 and 51 A of the Constitution of India, contrary ofthe letters and spirit of CLRA Act , 1970 , amounts to unfair labour practice and bad in law.

That the respondent by not considering the represen- tation ofthe petitioners dated 12-09-1997 for abolition and prohibition of contract labour in the jobs of lineman-tele- technician , supervisor , plumber and cook through contractor is arbitrary , contrary to the scheme of Act .

316

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA .: JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29, 1929

Thatthe respondent is not justified in law in treating the cleaner, helper -electrician , in which job the petitioners were employed as contract labour in view of the notification ofthe appropriate Government dated 09-12-1976 ).

Construction Company deployed claimant Nos.1, 5, 6 & 7 as Electric/Telephone line helpers and plumber and similarly, Contractor Vipin Aggarwal engaged claimant No.9 as Plumber for the prupose of execution of the contract at New Delhi House .

That there is no justification in law in not prohibiting the enaployment of contract labour in the employment of cleaner, helper - electrician , lineman- tele - technician , supervisor, plumer and cook by the responden t.

That as per the terms of the contracts , the above mentioned Maintenance/House Keeping contracts were in operation till October , 2001 after which the contracts have ceased to operate . By October , 2001 , the Corporation shifted its offices from the premises of New Delhi House , to its own building in Noida.

That the respondent has no justification in it's act of termination and in not treating the petitioners as their regularly employed employees and to pay tinem the pay and emoluments and other benefits which are admissible to regularly employed employees in the respective jobs .

That the petitioners have various documents and evidences in their possession to show that they are entitled to be regularized in the services of the respondent.

That the claimants were employees of M/ s . Sirohi Engineering and Contractors , M/ s . Cosmo Construction and Contractor Vipin Aggarwal . The Corporation is not the principal employer of the claimants after October, 2001 and there exists no relationship of any kind whatsoever between the corporation and the claimants.

That the petitioners also would file and reply on the various orders of the courts , authorities in various proceedings suggesting that the petitioriers are entitledto the relief sought in the present proceeclings .

It is submitted that the facts pleaded in the present petition as well as the documents and the evidence , the orders of the court which are being relied and which would be filed during the course of the present proceedings would definitely entitle the petitioner to the relief sought in this proceeding.

That the Contractors M/s . Sirohi Engineering and Contractors Company employed the workmen Nos 2 to 4 & 8. Claimant Nos. 1, 5 to 7 were employed by the Contractor M/s . Cosmo Construction Company. Similarly, claimant No.9 was employed by contractor Vipin Aggarwal . These claimants were engaged by the abovementioned contractors for the purpose of execution of the House Keeping/Maintenance contracts in the premises of New Delhi House occupied by the Corporation till October , 2001. As it was decided to shift the office of IOCL from the rented premises of New Delhi House to the Corporation's own office at Noida , there was no question of renewal of contract or lining up of new contract for maintenance services at New Delhi House .

That there is no reason as to why the petitioner should not be granted the relief as prayed in this application . The respondent would suffer no harı n or prejudice nor it would be contrary to their interest .

Thatthe claimants are contract labour is not disputed but rather has been admitted by the claimants . There being no relationship of employer and employee between the parties and the cause of the labourers not having been espoused by the direct employees , the provisions of ID Act , 1947 be invoked to refer the dispute to the Industrial Tribunal .

The management has filed written statement . In the written statement it has been statted that the IOCL is engaged in core business activity of production distribution and marketing of essential petroleum products in the country and is ais a controlled industry under the ID Act, 1947. The Corporation has mainly three divisions namely Refinaries , Marketing and Pipelines;Division .

The claimants being employees of the contractors enterd into various agreements in the capacity of employees with their employers (contractors) from time to time on terms of employment such as salaries , allowances , bonus , PF and ESI Schemes , Employment Cards , Holidays and Festivals , Uniform, Nature of Duties , Arrears etc. That some of the offices of th e Pipelines Division of the Corporation and the Mainte nance and Inspection. Department of Refiniries Division were located at New Delhi House till October , 2001. During its occupancy at New Delhi House , Pipelines Division of IOCL had lined up contracts for the services of general Maintenance /House Keeping.

That in the light of these legal agreements wherein the terms of employment were expressly settled between the claimants and their respective employers , the contention of the claimants that the claimants have been working under the control and supervision of the management of IOCL is misleading .

That the Corporation ente red into three different legal contracts on specific terms and conclitions with M/s . Sirohi Engineering and Contractors , M/ s . Cosmo Construction Company and Contractor Vipin Aggarwal to provide general Maintenance/House Keeping services which were operative till October , 2001 at New Delhi House .

That as is evident from the above mentioned agreements the rights and liabilities of the employers and service conditions of the employees were mutually agreed between the claimant and their employers (contractors) . The contention that the service condition and the working That the contractor's M/s . Sirohi Engineering and Contractors Company engaged the present claimant Nos . 2, 3 , 4 & 8 as cleaners , Contractors M/ s . Cosmo 317

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

That with this factual position and admitted position of the claimants , it is submitted that IOCL is not the employer of any of these claimants and therefore they cannot raise Industrial Dispute against the corporation under the ID Act , 1947.

The contention that the service condition and the working of the workmen was controlled and supervised by the corporation and the Contractor was only to deprive the workers of their legitimate rights is self contradictory thereforewrong.

It is stated that there is no dispute to fact that the claimants are engaged and employed as contract labour by the respective contractors in. the premises of IOCL . However, it is denied that the contractors change from time totime .

Thatit is sole discretion of the contractors to engage theirworkmen as per their requirement on mutually agreed terms of employment . In this context, it is submitted even if the contract labour were continuously engaged for a number ofyears in the premises of the Corporation , it does not create any right to regularization/absorption in the services of the Corporation . Rather , being the regular employees of the contractors , any legal and valid claim may be raised against the contractors being their employers and not against the Corporation . Therefore , their claim for regularization on the grounds submitted in the statement ofclaim do not sustain against the Corporation .

That the nature of work rendered by the claimants is not permanent in nature . As mentioned in the background, the claimants were engaged by the contractors for the purpose of execution of the House Keeping/Maintenance contracts in the premises ofNew Delhi House for a limited period tillOctober, 2001. Thereafter , no other contracthas been lined up by the corporation for the said services . The list submitted by the claimants is denied as baseless and concocted.

That as per the documents submitted by the claimants themselves during conciliation proceedings and enclosed as above , and as per the rationale of SAIL Judgment, the claimants are under express control and supervision of their respective employers and they were guidedby the mutually agreed terms ofemployment .

It is denied that the respondent being the principal employer has got ultimate control over the employees who were recruited through or at the behest of the labour ccintractor . There is no control by the corporation , either express or implied over the claimants . The claimants were under direct supervision and control of their respective employers/ contractors .

That in view ofthe above admission by the claimants , it issubmitted that engagement of the claimants by various contractors who were their employers cannot give rise to a right to regularization in the employment of the Corporation.

That the claimants also admit that the contractors disbursed the wages of the claimants . In the light of this admission and in accordance with the agreements entered between the claimants and the contractors as to the terms and conditions of services , it is reaffirmed that the Corporation does not control the service conditions ofthe claimants .

Itisdenied that the claimants are deprived ofthe pay and implements which they are legally entitled to . As submitted earlier , the claimants being employees of the contractors entered into various agreements in the capacity ofemployees with their employers (contractors ) fromtime totime on terms of employment such as salaries , allowances , bonus, PF and ESI schemes , Employment Cards, Holidays and festivals , Uniform , Nature of Duties , Arrears etc. and were government by such agreements with their respective employers . The corporation is neither a party to such agreements nor has any say in the terms and conditions of the said agreements .

The contract was not for perennial and permanent nature of work , and the fact is that after the period of contract was over w.e.f. October , 2001 , no other contract has been lined up and the claimants have not been engaged under any similar contract .

That the services provided by the contractor for which the claimants were engaged is not perennial in nature. No other contract was lined up after the expiry of the said contract for which claimants were engaged.

Theworkmen applicants have filed rejoinder. In the rejoinder they have reiterated the averments of their claim statement and have denied most of the paras of the written statement . The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement .

Evidence of both the parties has been taken.

Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.

Itwas submitted from the side of the workmen that the workmen have been employed as contract labour employees in the office/ units of the respondents in the category ofcleaner, helper, electrician, line man, technician, That as is evident from these agreements the terms and conditions such as salaries, allowances , bonus , PF & ESI Schemes , Employment Cards , Holidays and Festivals ,. Uniforms, Nature of Duties , Arrears etc , are settled between the concemed employer and the claimants . Thus it also substantiates the stand of the Corporation that it has no employer and employee relationship with the claimants . This further clarifies that employee relationship with the claimants . This further clarified that employer - employee relationship exists between the contractors and the claimants with whom they have settled the terms and conditions of their employment through collective bargainings .

318

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008 /PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] supervisor, plumber and cook . The contractors changed from time to time but in view ofthe nature of the work the management retained the services of these workmen continuously all through irrespective of the change of the contractor . The respondents being the principal employer got control over the employees who were recruited through at the behest of the labour contractor.

The workmen have filed photocopies documents . The documents B - 13 & B - 14 are on the plain papers . These documents are not on the letter head of the management and there is no seal and signature of the management over these documents . These documents may be get typed by anyone . Document B - 52 is the similar documents but it also does not contain any seal or signature ofthe management .

The workmen have filed photocopies Paper No. B - 111 to B - 113 . these documents also do not bear seal and signature of the management .

The management has filed papers regarding contract agreement and the case of the management is that the workmen may have been engaged through different contractors .

Itwas further submitted that the Central Government has abolished the contract labour system for sweeping, cleaning , dusting and watching of the building owned/ occupied by the establishment in respect of which the appropriate is the Central Government . The work is of perennial nature . Contract Labours cannot be engaged for a work which is of perennial nature and of sufficient duration . The workman is of permanent nature and is incidental to the day to day men work of the respondents.

It was submitted from the side of the management that the IOCL is engaged in core business activity of production distribution and marketing of essential petroleum products in the country and is a controlled industry under the ID Act, 1947. The Corporation has mainly three divisions namely Refiniries , Marketing and PipelinesDivision .

The contract labour will not automatically become the employee ofthe principal employer until he establishes that he worked under the control and supervision of the management . In the instant case there is no document showing the control and supervision of the management. Payment to the workmen have been made by the contractors. The management has entered into agreement for various types ofwork .

The substantial question is whether the workmen worked under the control and supervision of the management and the work is perennial in nature.

It was further submitted that some of the offices of the Pipelines Division of the Corporation and the Maintenance & Inspection Department of Refinary Division ws located at New Delhi House till October , 2001 . During its occupancy at New Delhi House, Pipelines Division of IOCL had lined up contracts for the services of general Maintenance/House Keeping .

The workmen have filed WW1/2 . It is regarding implementation of the judgment of the Hon ' ble Supreme Court dated 17-01-1986 . WWI /3 is a circular dated 05-09-1986 . The workmen have not filed any document to show that they worked under the control and supervision ofthe management . Every contract worker cannot be treated to be the employee of the Principal Employer, in case he is engaged by a contractor .

Itwasfurther submitted that the Corporation entered into three different legal contracts on specific terms and conditions with M/s. Sirohi Engineering and Contractors , M/s. Cosmo Construction Company and Contractor Vipin Aggarwal to provide general Maintenance /House Keeping services which were operative till Qctober , 2001 at New Delhi House.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court has also emphasized that the Courts/Tribunals in their sympathy for the handful adhoc/ casual employees before it cannot ignore the claims for equal opportunity for the teening millions of the country who are also seeking employment . In such case , the Courts/Tribunals should adhere to the Constitutional norms and should not water down constitutional requirement in any way .

InPollock Law of Torts a servant and an independent contractor has been defined as under :-

Itwas further submitted that the contractors were in operation till October, 2001 after which the contractors have ceased to operate by October , 2001. The Corporation shifted its office from the premises ofNew Delhi House to its own building in Noida . The contracts of erstwhile contractors were not renewed as the corporation left the rented premises of New Delhi House and shifted to the Corporation's own office at Noida . No new contractors have been engaged in the owned building at Noida.

The distinction between a servant and a indeperidence contractor has been the subject matter of a large volume of case - law from which the text - book writers on torts have attempted to lay down some general tests . Forexample , in Pollock's Low ofTorts , (Pages 62 & 63 of Pollock on Torts , 15th Edn . ) the distinction has thus been brought out.

A master is one who not only prescribes to the workman the end of his work , but directs or at any moment It was further submitted that the workmen may be contractor's workmen but they worked under the control and supervision of the contractors . The contractors assigned the duties to them and the working of the workmen was controlled and supervised by the contractors . The contract was not for permanent and perennial nature ofwork and after the period of contract w.e.f. October , 2001 the work ceased and no workmen have been engaged under any contractor .

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

319

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

to, when regular vacancies in posts , at a particular point of time, are tobe filled up and the filling up ofthose vacancies cannot be done in a haphazard manner or based on patronage or other considerations . Regular appointment must be the rule .

may direct the means also , or, as it has been put, retains the power ofcontrolling the work, a servant is a person subject to the command of his master as to the manner in which he shall do his work ..... An independent contractor is one who undertakes to produce a given result but so that in the actual execution of the work is not under the order or control of the person for whom he does it, and may use his own discretion in things not specified beforehand ..... "

My attention was drawn to another Constitution Bench Judgment - Steel Authority of India. It has been held as under:

In Salmond's Treatise on the Law of Torts the distinction between a servant and independent contractor has been indicated as under :

"Where a workman is hired in or in connection with the work of an establishment , by the principal employer through a contractor, he merely acts as an agent so there will be master and servant relationship between the principal employer and the workmen . But where a workman is hired in or in connection with the work of an establishment by a contractor , either because he has undertaken to produce a given result for the establishment or because he supplies workmen for any work of the establishment, a question migIOC arise whether the contract is a mere camouflage as in Hussainabhai Calicut's case ( supra) and in Indian Petrochemicals Corporation's case (supra) etc ; ifthe answer isinthe affirmative , the workmen will be in fact an employee ofthe principal employer, but if the answer is in the negative , the workmenwill be a contract labourer ."

"What then , is the test of this distinction between a servant and an independent contractor? The test is the existence of a right of control over the agent in respect of the manner in which his work is to be done . A servant is an agent who works under the supervision and direction of his employer; an independent contractor is one who is his own master. A servant is a person engaged to obey his employer's orders from time to time ; an independent contractor is a person engaged to do certain work, but to exercise his own discretion as to the mode and time of doing it he is bound by his contract, but not by his employer's orders ."

The test regarding independent contractor and intermediaries have been laid down in Hussainabhai , Calicut V.theAlath Factory Thezhilali Union kozhikode [AIR 1978 SC 1410 ( 3 judges ) ] the true test may , with brevity, be indicated once again . Where a worker or group ofworkers labours to produce goods or services and these goods or services are for the business of another , that other is , in fact, the employer. He has economic control over the workers subsistence , skill , and continued employment .

The workmen have been engaged through contractors. The burden of proving that they worked under the control and supervision of the management is on the workmen. They have to discharge the initial burden . They have not filed any cogent documentary evidence to establish that the work was assigned to the workmen by the management and they worked under the control and guidance of the management . They have filed affidavit regarding the fact no doubt but their affidavits are self serving.

My attention was drawn to the Constitution Bench Judgment in Scale (2006) 4 Scale . It has been held in this case as under: ---

The management has denied that they worked under thecontrol and guidance of the management . The workmen in the circumstances have to prove by cogent documentary evidence that the management was their master and the management decided what is to be done and how it is to be done.

The workmen have been engaged by the contractors and the contractors have taken duties from them.

"A. Public employment in a sovereign socialist secular democratic republic has to be as set down by the Constitution and the laws made there under . Our constitutional scheme envisages employment. by the Government and its instrumentalities on the basis of a procedure established in that behalf. Equality of opportunity is the hallmark and the Constitution has provided also for affirmative action to ensure that enequals are not treated equals . Thus , any public employment has to be in terms of the constitutional scheme .

Inview ofthe Constitution Bench Judgment referred to above contractual workmen cannot be regularized. There is no master and servant relationship in view of the criteria laiddown in the judgments referred to above .

Inthe instant case the workmen have been engaged through the various contractors for the work of the contractor that too till October, 2001 in the New Delhi House . When the Corporation shifted its office to Noida , no contract agreement was renewed .

From perusal of the documents on record it also transpires that the work is not of perennial nature. It was submitted from the side of the management that contracts were not in operation after October , 2001 and after that the B. A sovereign government , considering the economic situation in the country and the work to be got done , is not precluded from making temporary appointments or engaging workers on daily wages . Going by a law newly enacted, the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 , the object is to give employment to at least one member of a family for hundred days in an year , on paying wages as fixed under that Act . But, a regular process of recruitment or appointment has to be resorted

62G1/08-21 320

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008 /PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II--SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] rented billding was left by the management and it shifted its office from the premises of New Delhi House to its own building at Noida .

been denied by the management . These photocopies documents bear the signature and seal of the management . The management has not anywhere stated that the signatures ofMr. Prabhakaran , Rakesh Jain etc. are forged. These gate passes establish that the workman has worked for almost 11 years under the control and supervision of the management .

It was also submitted by the management that at present no contractors have been engaged. The work which was performedby the contractor's men in rented building has ceased to be in existence and that is why no contractor has been engaged for discharge of the duties performed by the contractors workmen in their own premises at Noida.

In case the principal employer is the master the workman is to be treated as the servant of the master . The workman Sh . Sushil Kumar has worked under the control and supervision of the management. The management has decided what is to be done and how it is to be done . In the circumstances there is master and servant relationship between the management and Sh . Sushil Kumar.

It has been held in Uma Devi's case that in case a workman works for 10 years without the orders of the court, the management should consider the feasibility of regularization . This workman has worked for 11 to 12 years under the control and supervision of the management . Contract in his case is sham and ruse . The contractors are only name lenders as the workman has worked under the control and supervision of the management .

Ithas been further held in Steel Authority of India's Case of the Hon ' ble , Supreme Court that if a contractor engages workmen for the wark of management such workmanwill become an employee of the principal employer .

The workmen have filed rejoinder but in their rejoinder they have not stated that the contractual workmen are still working in the management's office at its own Noida Building. WWI has stated that he has no knowledge whether contractor's workmen are still engaged . It becomes quite vivid from the statement of the WWI that at present contractor's workmen are not being engaged by the nhanagement as such the work which the contractor's workmen performed in the rented premises , New Delhi House does not exist at present. In case the work is not continuing, there is no meaning of regularization or reinstatement . In view of this fact also there is no question ofreguarization ofthe workmen . The workmen have filed photocapies documents . The originals are in the possession of the management. It is not expected that the workmen will file the originals but all the photocopies filed by the workmen are on blank papers . They do not bear any seal or signature of the management , such type of documents maybe prepared. The workmen have not filed any proof that they have been working since 1988. Even photocopies documents do not establish that the workmen liave been engaged since 1988 .

It was submitted from the side of the management thateven ifit is found proved that the contractor's workmen have worked for a long duration, they are not entitled to regularization. Section 10 of CLRA Act, 1970 provides that contract labours cannot be engage for a work of regular nature or for a work of sufficient duration . As such the engagement of contractor's workmen for regular nature of work and work of sufficient duration will become illegal . The management cannot be permitted to perperrate illegality.

As already discussed it is settled law that the workmen have to prove that they acted under the control and supervision of the management . Economic control and supervision is the sole test for holding contractor's employees to be the employees of the principal employer . In the instant case payment has been made to the workmen by the contractor , so they worked under the economic control of the contractor . All the workmen other than Sh. Sushil Kumar have filed photocopy documents which are not on the letter head of the management and they do not bear any seal and signature of any of the officer of the management . So it cannot be said that these photocopies have nexus to the original documents . The work cannot be said to be continuous and of perennial nature as the management has shifted its office to its own building at Noida and no contract workers have been engage therein. So the workmen other than Sh . Sushil Kumar are not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

However, the workman , Sh . Sushil Kumar has filed gate passes B - 87 to B - 99 . These gate passes have been issued on the letter head of the management. The gate passes bear seal of Sh. M. Prabhakaran, Administrative Officer. These gate passes are from 1990 to 1997. These gate passes have been signed by Sh . Rakesh Jain , SPE also . These gate passes establish that the workman has been assigned duties by the management.

So far as the case of Sh . Sushil Kumar is concerned he has amply proved that he worked under the control and supervision of the management by filing photocopy documents on the letter head of the management and bearing the signature and seal of the management . These photocopy documents have not been denied by the management. In the circumstances the photocopy documents are admissible in evidence . This workman has worked for 11 to 12 years and he deserves to be reinstated and regularized.

In ID cases sometimes photocopy documents become, admissible in evidence . The management will invariably conceal the originals . The workman in the circumstances is constrained to file the photocopies documents only. These photocopies documents have not 321

भारत का राजपत्र : अनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29, 1929

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF MUMBAI PORT TRUST

The Chairman Mumbai Port Trust

Mumbai-400038.

He is out of employment as his services have been illegally terminated by the management but he is a manual worker and he must be doing some sort ofwork offand on, so he is entitled to be reinstated with 25% back wages. The management should consider his case for regularization within two months from the date of the publication of the award.

AND THEIR WORKMAN

TheSecretary

In view ofthe long tenure the management should consider the feasibility of regularization of the workman Sh. Sushil Kumar .

The reference is replied thus:

Mumbai Port Trust Workers Union ShrikantHadkarMarg Near Kalachowki Police Station

Mumbai-400 033 .

APPEARANCE:

FOR THE EMPLOYER

Mr. Umesh Nabar, Advocate.

FOR THE WORKMAN

The action ofthe management of IOCL, New Delhi in not regularizing the services ofconcerned 8 workmen from the date of their initial appointment is just, fair and legal . However, the management should reinstate the workman Sh . Sushil Kumar along with 25 % back wages and consider the feasibility of his regularization within two months from the date of the publication of the award.

Ms. Kunda Samant, Advocate. The award is given accordingly.

Mumbal , the 7th November, 2007

AWARD PART- II

Lt copies of the Award be sent to the Ministry of Labour , Government of India for necessary action at their end.

Date: 17-12-2007

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 31 दिसम्बर , 2007

1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its Order No.L- 31012 /15 / 99/IR ( M) dated 06-08-1999 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Mumbai Port Trust in dismissing the services of Shri Tukarak ShadashivMane is justified ? ifnot, to what reliefthe workman is entitled to?"

का.आ. 130.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मुम्बई पोर्ट ट्रस्टके प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय 11 , मुम्बई , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई टी- 2/166/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-2007 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

! [ सं. एल-31012/15/1999- आईआर (एम) ]

एन. एस. बोरा , डेस्क अधिकारी

2. On the basis of the said reference notices were issued under clause (d) ofsub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 .

New Delhi, the 31st December , 2007

S.O. 130.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/166/1999) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, 11 , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Mumbai Port Trust , and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 31-12-2007 .

3.Toprovethe claim made in the reference, the Union by Statement of claim filed at Exhibit -6, contended that the second party viz. The Mumbai Port Trust Workers ' Union is the oldest registered Trade Union not only in Mumbai PortTrust but also in India. The said union is registered in 1928 and functioning since then for the welfare of the workers of the Mumbai Port Trust. It has considerable members of the employees of the Mumbai Port Trust. It was known as Bombay Port Trust Railway Men's Union till20th February, 1998.

[No. L- 31012/15/ 1999- IR (M)] N. S. BORA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2, AT MUMBAI

PRESENT

A. A. LAD

PRESIDING OFFICE

Reference No. CGIT- 2/166 of1999

4. The Enquiry was conducted by the first party by issuing charge sheet dated 2nd January 1995 alleging that 42wagonswere received at 10.00 a.m. on 13th June 1994 at Station BPT " G " and placement of these wagons for delivery is shown as 16 wagons on 16th June 1994, 19 wagons on 25th June 1994 and 7 wagons on 9th July 1994 . It was alleged that 7 wagons were received at 7.30 hrs . on 9th June 1994 and its placement is shown as 3 wagons on 17th June 1994, 4 wagons on 18-6-1994, 21 wagons were received on 14th June 1994 at 23.00 hs . and their placement 62G1/08-22 322

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] is shown as 5 wagons on 16-6-1994 at 23.00 hrs . , 11 wagons on 17-6-1994 and 5 wagons on 18th June 1994. By all this it is alleged that there is delay in placement of wagons from 3 days to 27 days which caused inconvenience to the Railway authorities and traffic of that area and caused loss of revenue to the Trunk Railways in several lakhs . It was alleged that said placement was not done carefully and taking care to avoid such revenue loss and it was alleged that it is workman T.S. Mane who is responsible for all that. Inthe reply filedby the workman to the charge sheet made out case that he alone is not responsible for the said loss . In fact it was the duty of other staff members for the placement of the wagons . He is overall controlling the placement of the wagons and alone is not responsible for the loss sufferedby the first party. Second party workman was supposed to work 90 % as per the orders received from his superiors and has no discretion to take any independent decision as Station Master . Assistant Station Master works under him to supervise the work of Operative Staff Class III and Class IV and in that capacity he is directly responsible for yard position , receipt of up trains and their sorting and that wagons are not stable at level crossing to heldup vehiculartraffic ofthat area . It is contended that he is the workman and comes under the category of class III and has no individual power to take any decision . He is the member of the union, he is covered under wage- settlements which took place between union and employers . He has no power to write confidential reports or sanction leave of any staff. According to him , he is equivalent to Assistant Superintendents' position working in other departments ofthe first party and comes in the scale of Rs.2,600-100- 120-9940 According to Union , the second partyworkman T.S.Manewasdoing his routine work of operating section and was senior almost amongst the staff. He being the senior workman used to solve the problems in consultation with all in case of any difficulty arises . If any problem arises regarding booking or traffic jam of goods , ASM of the particular shift has to make report of the errant employee and has to recommend action to be taken against such errantworkman . However , T.S.Mane has no power to take decision in that respect. He has no power to pullup any employee or initiate any enquiry against him . Since he is not writing confidential reports of any of the staff and has no power to sanction leave he cannot cross his status from the cadre of the workman to officer though he is called Station Master. Even he has no power to grant earned leave or any other relief. He was getting over time and as such his status, fall under the definition of ' workman ' as defined under Section 2 of Industrial Disputes Act .

5. It is further contended that he was promoted on 24th July 1984 and since then working as Station Master which is ofGrade II . During the period 30-9-1994 he was overall incharge ofthe Ground Department from 24-4-1990 to30-8-1994, used to attend various circulars received from RailwayManager . According to Union , workman T.S.Mane

is not responsible for the delay in the placement of the wagons from 3 to 27 days as alleged and responsible for the alleged loss in lakhs of rupees caused to the first party. According to the union , placement of wagons or rakes are in the Depots which is doneby the Senior Trains Clerk under the direct supervision of Station Master i.e. workman. According to the union , each employee is performing his specific duties . The workman cannot be held responsible for it .As placement of wagons is to be provided by ASM for each shift and for which workman T.S.Mane cannot be held responsible for the alleged delay caused . It is further contended that , holding enquiry is farce by appointing Mr. D.M.Daithankar and advocate as an Enquiry Officer who generally and regularly conducts such departmental enquiries ofthe employees of the Mumbai Port Trust. The workman was represented by the Secretary of the Union by name Mr. Pagare . The evidence brought on record by the first party of Mr. Warelikar , Mendhale, Toreskar and Jaiswal wherein they have stated similar things stereo type against the workman and it does not help actually to the Inquiry Officer to give finding against the workman . Besides first party was represented by law graduate or the practicing advocate and against that the workman was represented by the union representative . It is alleged that, the Inquiry Officer shown favour towards the Management . He allowed the re -examination of the Mehandale , ASM who was supervising Class III and IV staffin the Yard. The said witness is not expected to stable the wagons at level crossing to hold up the vehicular traffic . However , placement was given to the workman and as such for that, workman T.S.Mane cannot be held responsible. According to him, Senior Train Clerk is responsible for the placement ofthe wagons and responsible for the loss caused to the first party. By allowing re - examination of Mr. Mehandale Inquiry Officer supported the first party in concluding like that. In the inquiry, said ASM categorically admitted that, he did not experierice any delay at any time for placement ofthe wagons . The witness examined by the first party did not give any proof for this type of advice from the workman regarding placement of wagons and that he is responsible for it. Even Mr. Warelikar who was examined by the first party says that, wagons were placed by operative staff as per placement shown by them in the respective registers . It isstated that, the placement time is shown by them in the respective demurrage registers and accordingly it is charged. Said Mr. Warelikar clearly bifurcate the duties and responsibilities of 2 Sections i.e. of operational and commercial but it was ignoredby the Inquiry Officer . It is further contended that Mr. R.R.Jaiswal recorded statements ofwitnesses in the presence of Presiding Officer . The said witness fairly admits that he is responsible for the commercial work of staff or the said Railway . In the deposition made before the Inquiry Officer , workman has categorically denied regarding delay in placement of wagons and stated that ASM was responsible for it . He also alleges that , demurrage was charged erroneously and 323 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

Committee, action of dismissal was taken which is just and fair. It is denied that the work of the placement of wagons was of ASM and there is bifurcation between operative and periodical work. As the action was taken after giving full opportunity to the workman and since he is not workman , this Tribunal cannot interfere with the decision taken by the first party in dismissing the second party workman Mr. T.S.Mane. So it is prayed that , the reference be rejected .

7. In view of the above pleadings my learned predecessors framed issues at Ex- 10 . Out of them , issue of workman, issue of fairness of inquiry and perversity of fidings were decided by passing part- I Award dated 7-4-2006 . Now issues framed on the latter part of the case pertaining to punishment and entitlement of the workman remains , which I answer as follows :

Issues

Findings

III . Whether the action of the management in dismissing the services of Shri Tukaram Sadashiv Mane is justified ? Yes .

V. Ifnot , what relief the workman is entitled to ?

Does not survive .

REASONS

Issues 3 & 4:

said work was done by the Commercial Department. He also alleges that placement of wagons was done by the Trunk Clerk under the supervision of ASM. The evidence led by the workman of Mr. Parshoram supports his case . The said witness was not cross examined by the first party. It is alleged that, there is no delay in placement of wagons asalleged. If at all there was any loss it cannot be attributed to the workman. The duties of the ASM are fixed where it is not stated anywhere that, working of workman and that nowhere it is stated regarding the duties of the Station Master. According to him enquiry was farce and report was perverse . Since he was not happy with the finding submitted by the Inquiry Officer , he preferred an appeal on 18th July, 1996 to the Chairman of the Bombay Port Trust . Even he approached the Chairman when his grievances were not considered by the Appellate Authority still decision was taken of termination . According to him he was victimized by the first party with the help of enquiry and its report . So dispute is raised by the Union of workman T.S.Mane who is the member of the Union and pray to declare dismissal order of workman T.S. Mane illegal and unjust and arbitrary and was taken by way of victimization. It is also prayedto declare chargesheet as perverse . It is submitted that 31 years of long service rendered. by the workman T.S.Mane be considered which was unblemished and without any spot and as such it is prayed that the workman T.S.Mane be reinstated with benefits of back wages and continuity of service.

8.On the basis ofenquiry conducted against second partyworkman, and findings obtained from Inquiry Officer , where Inquiry Officer observed concerned workman guilty ofthe charges levelled against him . Even the findings given by Inquiry Officer is observed just proportionate to the facts placed before him. Said part - I award is not challenged by the second party workman. So the findings given while passing Part - I award holding enquiry proper and findings not perverse remains on record undisturbed.

9. On the basis of the said, second party workman was removed from the employment by dismissing from the services . The allegations against second party workman were that , when second party was employed as a Station Master who was overall incharge of the station , supervising all work done by commercial and operating staff at station. Hewas responsible for the events which take place in the station area . He was also entrusted duty to fix the responsibility for careless and slack working among the staff. The charge sheet was issued against second party workman dated 02-01-1995 for non - performance of duties by making delay in placements of wagons from 3 to 27 days . It is also alleged that , due to said delay in placement ofwagons , first party suffered heavy financial loss . The explanation given by second party on it was of failure in performance of duty of Sr. Trains Clerk admits that such a loss occurred and indirectly he was responsible for it. And so action of termination was taken as loss was in lakhs . After holding enquiry in which concerned workman was represented by the representative in reply, has not denied 6. This claim is disputed by the first party by filing written statement at Exhibit- 7 stating and contending that, the second party is not the workman. He was working as Station Master. He was also supervising work of his sub- ordinates . He was overall incharge of the Station . He was also entrusted with the duties and with the responsibilities of careless and slack working amongst the staff. He had power and authority to sanctioned casual leave . According to first party, workman was responsible for the day -to-day working of the staff of the first party working under him and he is not workman as defined under Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act . It is further contended that the charges levelled against the workman were proved before the Enquiry Committee which was appointed. The Enquiry Committee conducted the enquiry fairly and properly and offered full opportunity to the workman and his representative. They enjoyed it and took part in the enquiry. Charges levelled against the workman were regarding placement ofwagons which are proved beyond doubt . It is also proved that the loss was occurred in crores because ofMr. T. S. Mane who was involved in the charges . Considering the findings given by the Enquiry 324

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] .

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008 /PAUSA 29 , 1929

occurrence of loss . Even he did not challenge the charge levelled against workman in the reply . His representative cross examined the witnesses . Documents were made available to him. Even he did not challenge the enquiry during its process and progress . After examining the witnesses , Inquiry Officer observed second party guilty of the charges. It is matter of record that, loss was in lakhs and it occurred in the jurisdiction of the second party . On the basis of the said order of termination was issued as a punishiment.

10. Second party challenged the said order saying that, it is not proportionate to the charges proved against him. Whereas case of the first party is that, punishment awarded on second party of dismissal is just and proper.

vis-a- vis dismissal from service is also regulated in the rules. In my considered view discretion used by first party in penalizing the employee of this type cannot be challenged without any reason . Besides it place reliance on citation published in 2002 (3 ) LLN page 1009 where it is observed that, in a criminal case if employee is acquitted definitely, it will help employee in making out case of lesser punishment but in my considered view facts of that case since are different from the facts of this case, ratio led by Karnataka High Court cannot be made applicable here . Another referred citation published in 2006 III LLJ 133 where Hon'ble Bombay High Court observed that , in case of theft case , entire responsibility cannot be put on workman . In that case lesser punishment can be awarded . But that was a case of theft which cannot be compared with the case of negligence . So I am of the opinion that , even ratio ofBombay High Court cannot be applied here to show lenience to this workman .

11. Charge of receiving loss of Rs . 40 lakhs to the BPT was levelled against concerned workman. However said charge was denied by the second party saying that , that loss cannot be of Rs . 40 lakhs but may be upto Rs . 25 lakhs and that too not to BPT Railway but to Trunk Railway . The arguments advance on this point by the learned Advocate for the second party by submitting it in written at Ex-44 that , said statement cannot be treated as confessional statement but it was opinion of the second party on it which I unable to digest . 1 fail to understand by referring that, what second party workman's advocate want to point out? When case of the first party was that , loss was upto Rs . 40 lakhs which was denied saying that , it was not upto Rs .40 lakhs but it may be upto Rs . 25 lakhs . When that admission is given it is presumed that he admits there was loss of Rs . 25 lakhs and not of Rs . 40 lakhs . In this situation question arises , whether it cannot be confession or it is opinion? There is no separate status in Evidence Act to the meaning of opinion . Evidence Act only recognizes admission , confession. Opinion can be taken from the experts and the case made out by second party about loss occurred to BPT denying loss of Rs . 40 lakhs and saying it may be Rs . 25 lakhs reveals that, there was a loss which may vary in amount . All these reveal that , there was loss . When there was such a loss it is not a meagre one and it was in lakhs and that too in. the year 1995 .

13. Against that learned advocate for first party referred citation published in 1996 I CLR page 389 where it is observed that, judicial review is not an appeal from a decision but review of the manner in which decision is made . It was tried to distinguish what is power of judicial review and meaning of appeal . By this learned Advocate for the first party wants to point out that, Tribunal cannot sit as a appellant court on the decision given by the management on the punishment given by it in case ofproved misconduct . In the instant case charge was proved and when charge is proved first party has liberty to exercise the option of giving punishment and that exactly is done by management . I also agree with this view since charge was proved which was of very serious nature , management exercised option of awarding punishment which has logic behind it. Citation referred published in 2002 ( III ) CLR page 293 reveals, what powers are given to Tribunal under Section 11 A of Industrial Disputes Act . Another referred citation published in 2003 ( 98 ) FLR page 1170 also of the same point regarding power of Tribunal under Section II A of the Industrial Disputes Act . Citation referred published in 1997 1 LLJ page 186 revels that punishment awarded by management was not shockingly disproportionate , which is not required by the Tribunal to interfere in it . Citation published in 2005 I CLR 959 projects on jurisdiction of Tribunal under Section 11 - A of the Industrial Disputes Act .

14. So if we consider all these coupled with case made out by both , I conclude that, punishment awarded to second party workman Mane does not require to interfere since I find it is proportionate to the charges levelled and proved. In the circumstances , second party is not entitled to get any relief. So I answer the above issues to that effect and pass the following order:

ORDER Reference is rejected. No order as to cost .

Date: 7-11-2008

A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer 12. So if we consider this coupled with the charges proved against the second party workman , in my considered view , punishment awarded ofdismissal cannot be observed inadequate or excessive one . Learned Advocate for the second party tried to place reliance on Regulations of BPT Employees and tried to point out that there are two types of penalties one is of " minor " penalties and other is of" major " penalties . Major penalty of dismissal is taken against second party workman . According to second party's advocate , there are lesser types of major penalties also like reduction to a lower stage in a time - scale ofpay for a specified period , or for forever . There is also lesser type of punishment of compulsory retirement and reducing the employee's seniority when charge of such type is proved and punishment of compulsory retirement [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 31 दिसम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 131.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एम. पी. स्टेट माईनिंग का. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय जबल पुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई टी/एलसी/आर/ 199 /1995 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-12-07 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [सं. एल-29011/19/1995- आईआर ( एम ) ]

एन. एस. बोरा , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi, the 31st December, 2007 S.O. 131. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/ LC/R/ 199/ 1995) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure in industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M. P. State Mining Corp. Ltd. and their workman, which was s received by the Central Government on 31-12-2007

[No. L-29011 / 19 / 1995 - IR(M) ] N. S. BORA, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC /R/ 199/95

PRESIDING OFFICER : SHRI C. M. SINGH TheSecretary, Chhattisgarh Mines Shramik Sangh , Baraduar,

Workman/Union Distt.Bilaspur

Versus

The Asstt. General Manager ,

M.P. State Mining Corporation Ltd. , Sub Office: Baraduar ,

Distt. Bilaspur

Management

AWARD

Passed on this 13th day of December , 2007 1.TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No.L-290 11/19/95 - IR(M) dated 3-11-95 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal :-

"Whether the demand of Chhattisgarh Mines Shramik Sangh for payment of full wages to 127 wagon loaders (as per list ) by the management of 62GI/08-23

325

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008 /पौष 29 , 1929

M.P. StateMining Corporation Ltd. , Baraduar, Distt. Bilaspur for the period from 10-4-93 to 26-4 93. is justified? If so , to what relief the concerned workers are entitled to?"

2. Vide order dated 4-1-06 passed on the ordersheet of this reference proceeding, the reference proceeded exparte against the workmen/ Union and the management was provided with an opportunity to file Written Statement on 28-4-06 . On 284-06 the date fixed in the case , no body responded for the parties, therefore, the management was given an opportunity to file exparte Written Statement on 17-8-06. Again on 17-8-06 , no body responded for the parties and the management was provided with another opportunity of filing exparte Written Statement on 27-10-06 . On 27-10-06 , Shri R.C.Shrivastava , Advocate appeared and submitted that he will file his vakalatnama for management on the next date . Therefore 22-1-07 was fixed for filing vakalatnama and exparte Written Statement bythemanagement. Thereafter 23-4-07, 7-8-07 & 12-12-07 were the dates fixed in the case but on the said dates , no body responded for the parties and thus the tribunal was left with no option but to close the reference for award and consequently the reference was closed for award.

3. Itappears from the above that the parties have no interest in the reference . Therefore no dispute award is passed without any orders as to costs.

4. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

C. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 132.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नेशनल बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और, उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 231/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-12-07 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -12012/25/ 1999- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 2nd January , 2008

S.O. 132. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 231 / 1999) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -Cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown iin the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab National Bank and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 24-12-2007 .

[No. L- 12012/25/ 1999 -IR (B- II)] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer 326

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008/PAUSA 29 , 1929

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO . CGIT/LC/R/231 /99

PRESIDING OFFICER : SHRI C. M. SINGH The Secretary,

Punjab National Bank Empls .Assn . ,

CentralOffice,

11 Prince Yeshwant Road ,

Workman/Union Indore.

Versus

TheRegional Manager,

PunjabNational Bank,

Management RegionalOffice, 20, Sneh Nagar, Indore

AWARD

Passed on this 14th day of December , 2007 1.The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No.L- 12012/25 /99 / IR(B - II ) dated 31-5-99/ 11-6-99 has referred the following dispute for adjudication bythis tribunal:

"Whether the action ofthe management of Regional Manager, Punjab National Bank in not absorbing Sh.Gopal Kamle & Sh.Santosh Kalal permanently in Bank'sservice is justified? If not , to what relief the workmen are entitled for ? " .

2. Vide order dated 9-2-07 passed on the ordersheet ofthisproceeding , the reference proceeded exparte against the workmen/Union and the management was given an opportunity to file their statement ofclaim , if any, for which 23rd of April - 07 was fixed. But on this date , no body responded for the parties . The management was given an opportunity to file their statement of claim , if any, on 7-8-07. The ordersheet discloses that on this date , no one responded for the parties and 12-12-07 was fixed for filing statement of claim , if any , by the management . On 12-12-07, no one responded for the parties . Under the above circumstances, this tribunal was left with no option but to close the reference for award and thus the reference was closed for award.

3. It appears from the above that the parties have no interest in this reference proceeding. In view of this fact , no dispute award should be passed.

4. Considering the above , no dispute award is passed without any orders as to costs .

5. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules .

C. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 7 जनवरी , 2008

का, आ. 133. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतदद्वारा 01 फरवरी , 2008 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 ( धारा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध तमिलनाडू राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात ,

"तिरूनेलवेली जिले के पुलियनकुडी नगरपालिका में पुलियनकुडी, टी. एन. पुदुकुडी, सिवगिरी तालुक में चिंतामणी , तेन्कासी तालुक में चोक्कम्पट्टी के अन्तर्गत आने वाले राजस्व गांव"

[सं. एस-38013/01 /2008 - एस. एस.- 1 ] एस. दो. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 7th January, 2008

S. O. 133. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the Ist February, 2008 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter- IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter- V and VI ( except Sub- Section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sec- tions 77, 78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Tamilnadu namely:-

CentreName

Areas comprising the revenue villages of

1. Puliyankudi

2. T. N. Pudukudi Puliyankudi Municipality in Tirunelvelli District

3. Chinthamani in

Sivagiri Taluk

4. Chokkampatti in Tenkási Taluk

[No. S- 38013 /01 /2008 - S.S. -I ]

S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 7 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 134. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा -1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतदद्वारा 01 फरवरी , 2008 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है) अध्याय -5 और 6 ( धारा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध तमिलनाडू राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:---

[भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

केन्द्र

दिन्छुकल जिला में पवनी परिधि के क्षेत्र

1. दिन्दुकल जिला में पषनी के पुलियमपट्टी के अंतर्गत आने वाले राजस्व गांव ।

[सं. एस-38013/03/2008 - एस. एस.1 ] एस. दो. जेवियर, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 7th January , 2008

S. O. 134. In exercise ofthe powers conferred by ub-section (3 ) of Section I of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government ereby appoints the 1st February, 2008 as the date on which se provisions of Chapter - IV ( except Sections44 and45 hich have already been brought into force) and Chapt Vand VI (except sub-section ( 1 ) ofSection 76 and Sections 77, 78,79 and 81 which have already been brought hate force) ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Tamilnadu namely:-

Centre

Peripheral areas of Palani in Dindigul District

Areas comprising the revenue villages of 1. Puliampatti ofPalani Taluk inDindigul District

[No. S-38013/03/2008- S.S. -I ] S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 7 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 135.-कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उपधारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतदद्वारा 01 फरवरी , 2008 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 ( धारा 76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध हरियाणा के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्,

जिला क्र. सं. राजस्व ग्राम हदबस्त संख्या

अंबाला

साहा

अंबाला तेपला

133

अंबाला 3.

मीठापुर

[सं. एस-38013/04/2008- एस. एस. - 1 ]

एस. दो. जेवियर, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 7th January, 2008

S. O. 135. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government

327

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

hereby appoints the Ist February, 2008 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter- Vand VI ( except sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Haryana namely: -

Had BastNo. District S.No. Revenue Village

Saha

Ambala 2.

133

Tepla

Ambala Ambala Mithapur

[No. S-38013/04/2008 -S.S- I] S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 7 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 136.-कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उपधारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 फरवरी , 2008 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 ( धारा 76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध गुजरात राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्,

अहमदाबाद नगर निगम की विस्तारित नगर सीमाओं में निम्नलिखित नगर पालिकाओं एवं ग्राम पंचायतों ( गांव ) की संपूर्ण राजस्व एवं पंचायत सीमाएं जो क्रमांक ( 1 ) एवं ( 2 ) पर अंकित हैं तथा क्रम सं. 3 पर अंकित विनियोजित सर्वेक्षण सं. शामिल हैं । (1) नगर पालिका बोडकदेव , मकरबा , नवा ओढव , वस्त्रापुर, नवानरोडा, थलतेज, वेजलपुर , सरखेज- ओकफ , जोधपुर , मेमनगर , घाटलोडिया, चांदलोडिया , वस्त्राल , निकोल , राणिप , काली एवं रामोल ।

(2) ग्राम पंचायत शाहवाडी, कमोड , ग्यासपुर, त्रागड़ , छारोडी, जगतपुर, चैनपुर , गोता , हेबतपुर, आमली , सैजपुर-गोपाल पुर, पीपलज , लक्ष्मीपुरा , वनजर , फतेवाडी , ओगणज , सोला , सीलज , नयाष्टवा, बाकरोल , बदराबाद (विसलपुर ) भाडज , नयाअसारवा , मकतमपुरा , निर्णयनगर, इन्दिरा नगर , नरिमानपुरा , हंसपुरा , लांभा एवं विंजोल

(3) असलालीः (सर्वे संख्या 154 पार्ट 1626 , 1659 ) रोपडा ( सर्वे संख्या 8 से 16 )

ब्रागे फिरदोश (सर्वे संख्या 271 , से 278 , 297 )

रखियाल (सर्वे संख्या 297 , 362 , 363 , 495 , 515 ) खोखरा-महेमदाबाद(सर्वे संख्या 340 , 341 ) 328

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19, 2008/PAUSA 29; 1929

। मुठिया( ब्लाक संख्या 71 /पी , 90/पी , 222 पार्ट , 223 पार्ट , 227 पार्ट, 228 पार्ट, 230 पार्ट )

हाथिजण ( सर्वे संख्या 256,612 , 615 , 617 , 619 , 620 ) [संख्या एस -38013/05/2008- एस. एस. -1 ]

एस. दो. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 7th January, 2008

S. Q. 136. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (3) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insur- ance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st February , 2008 as the date on which the provisions ofChapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter - V and VI (except sub -section ( 1) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) ofthe saidAct shall come into force in the following areas inthe State ofGujarat namely:-

Extended Municipal Limits of Ahmedabad Munici- palCorporation comprising the Entire Revenue & Panchayat Limits of the following Municipalities and Grampanchayats (Villages) mentioned at ( i ) & (ii ) below as well as at certain surveyNumbers mentioned at ( iii ) :

(i) Municipality- Bodakdev , Makarba, Nava Odhav , Vastrapur , Nava Naroda, Thaltej , Vejalpur, Sarkhej- Okaf, Jodhpur , Memnagar, Ghatlodia, Chandlodia, Vastral , Nikol , Ranip, Kali & Ramol .

(ii) Gram Panchayats- Shahvadi, Kamod, Gyaspur, Tragad, Chharodi , Jagatpur, Chenpur , Gota, Hebatpur , Amli , Saijpur -Gopalpur , Piplaj , Laxmipura, Vanjar , Fatevadi , Ognaj , Sola, Shilaj , Nava Vatva , Bakrol , Badarabad (Visalpur) , Bhadaj , Nava Asarwa , Maktampura , Nirnaynagar , Indiranagar, Narimanpura , Hanspura, Lambha & Vinzol .

(iii) Aslali (Survey Number 154 Part, 1626, 1659) Ropda ( Survey No. 8 to 16)

Bage Firdosh (Survey No. 271 to 278 , 297 ) Rakihal(Survey No. 297, 362, 363,495,515) Khokhra-Mehmedabad (Survey No. 340, 341) Muthiya(Block No. 71 /P, 90 /P, 222 Part, 223 Part, 227 Part, 228 Part, 230 Part) .

Hathijan- (Survey No. 256, 612 , 615 , 617 , 619, 620) .

[No. S- 38013/05/2008 -S- S.I ]

S.D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 8 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 137.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34) की धारा 1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 फरवरी , 2008 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] चुकी है ) अध्याय-5 और 6 ( धारा 76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध तमिलनाडु , राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:-

"तिरूनेलवेली जिला में तेन्कासी तालुक के कडयनल्लूर नगर पालिका परिसीमा के कडंयनल्लूर , कम्बनेरी पुदुकुडी के भाग- I व II के अन्तर्गत आने वाले राजस्व गांव "

[संख्या: एस-38013/02/2008 /एस. एस. -1 ] 'एस. दो. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 8th January, 2008

S. O. 137. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 3) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insur- ance Act, 1948 ( 34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st February, 2008 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter -V and VI (except sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77 , 78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas inthe State ofTamilnadu namely:-

Centre Name

Areas comprising the revenue villages of Kadayanallur Municipal Limits, Tenkasi Taluk in Tirunelvelli District

01. Kadayanallur 02. Kambaneri Pudukudi Part I & II [No. S- 38013/02/2008 -S.S.I ] S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 11 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 138.-कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 फरवरी , 2008 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकीहै ) अध्याय -5 और 6 ( धारा 76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध तमिलनाडू राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:-

केन्द्र का नाम

विरूधनगर जिला के निम्नलिखित राजस्व गाँव के व्याप्त क्षेत्र

विरूधनगर जिला में कारियापट्टी तालुक के कलकुरिच्ची के राजस्व गाँव विरूधनगर जिला में कारियापट्टी कारियापट्टी क्षेत्र

[ संख्या एस-38013/09/2008 - एस. एस. -1 ] एस. दो. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 11th January, 2008

S. O. 138. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State 329

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the Ist February , 2008 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter-V and VI (except sub-Section (1) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Tamilnadu namely:-

Centre

Areas comprising the following area revenue village of

Virudhunagar District.

Kariapatti area in Virudhunagar District

(1) Revenue village of Kalkurichi ofKariapatti Taluk in Virudhunagar District

[No.S-38013/09/2008-S.S.I ] S.D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 139. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34) की धारा -1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतदद्वारा 01 फरवरी , 2008 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 ( धारा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध तमिलनाडू राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात,

केन्द्र

तिरूनेलवेली जिला में तिरूनेलवेली नगरपालिका 1. विजयराघव मुद‌लियार चत्रम

2. पालयमकोट्टै तालुक में पणयंकुलम

3. तिरूणलवेली तालुक में रामायणपट्टी

आदि के अंतर्गत आने वाले राजस्व गाँव.......

[संख्या एस-38013/08/2008- एस. एस. -1 ]

एस. दो. जेवियर , अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 11th January, 2008

S. O. 139. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insur- anceAct, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st February , 2008 as the date on which the provisions ofChapter IV ( except Section 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter -V and VI (except sub - Section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Tamilnadu namely:-

Centre

Areas comprising the revenue villages of

01. Vijayaraghava Mudaliar Chatram Tirunelvelli Municipality inTirunelvelli District

02. Panayankulam in Palayamkottai Taluk

03. Ramayanpatti in Tirunelveli Taluk

[No. S-38013/08/2008- S.S.I ] S.D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 11 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 140.-कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतदद्वारा 01 फरवरी , 2008 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के . अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6( धारा 76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध कर्नाटक के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात,

क्र. राजस्व ग्राम का नाम सं. व नगरपालिका सीमाएँ होबली तालुकं 'जिला 1. मेडेहल्ली , जी. आर. हल्ली इनगलाडालू, कुंचीगनाहालू कसाबा चित्रदुर्गा चित्रदुर्गा

[सं. एस-38013/10/2008- एस. एस. -1 ] एस. दो. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 11th January , 2008

S. O. 140. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insur- anceAct, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st February, 2008 as the date on which the provisions ofChapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter -V and VI (except Sub -Section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Section 77, 78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Karnataka namely:-

District SI. Name of the Revenue Hobli Taluk No. Village or Municipal Limits

1. Medehalli , G. R. Halli , Kasaba Chitradurga Chitradurga Ingaladalu & Kunchiganahalu

[No. S-38013/10/2008-S.S. -I ] S. D. XAVIER , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 11 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 141.-कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा-1 कीउप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतदद्वारा 01 फरवरी , 2008 को 330

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 19 , 2008 /PAUSA 29 , 1929

उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय 4 (44) व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है। ) अध्याय-5 और 6( धारा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध तमिलनाडू राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात ,

* तमिलनाडु राज्य के जिला कोयम्बटूर में अविनासी के आसन्न क्षेत्र में तिरूपुर तालुक में एट्टीवीरमपालयम तथा पेरूमनल्लूर के अधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र । "

[सं. एस -38013/07/2008 -एस . एस. - 1 ]

एस. दो. जेवियर , अवर सचिव NewDelhi, the 11th January, 2008

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] New Delhi , the 11th January, 2008

S. O. 142. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government herebyappoints the 1st February, 2008 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter - IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter- V and VI ( except Sub-Section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Section 77, 78,79 and 81 which have alteady been brought into force) ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Tamilnadu namely:- Centre

Areas comprising the following area revenue village of Sivagangai District 01. Devakottai municipal limits of Devakottai Taluk and

Devakottai area in

Sivagangai District

S. O. 141. In exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st February, 2008 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter - IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brouth into force ) and-Chapter- Vand VI (except Sub- Section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Section 77, 78,79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Tamilnadu namely: -

Centre

Areas comprising the revenue villages of

1. Ettiveerampalayam

2. Perumanallur Avinashi Peripherals , Tirupur Taluk, Coimbatore District

[No. S- 38013/07/2008 -S.S.I ]

S.D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 11 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 142. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34) की धारा-1 कीउप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतदद्वारा 01 फरवरी , 2008 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी हैं ) अध्याय -5 और 6 ( धारा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77,78,79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध तमिलनाडू राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात ,

केद्र का नाम नाम

निम्नलिखित क्षेत्र के व्याप्त क्षेत्र शिवागंगै जिला के राजस्व गाँव शिवागगि जिला में देवाकोट्टई

1. देवाकोट्टई नगरपालिका सीमा के देवाकोट्टई क्षेत्र

2. शिवागंगै जिला के देवाकोट्टई तालुक के मेलेचेमषोनमारी के राजस्व गाँव

[सं. एस-38013/06/2008 - एस. एस.- 1 ] एस. दो. जेवियर , अवर सचिव 02. Revenue village of Melachęmponmari of Devakottai Taluk of Sivagangai District . [No. S-38013/06/2008 - S.S.I ]

S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 15 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 143.-केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट है कि लोकहित में ऐसा अपेक्षित है कि सिक्युरिटी पेपर मिल, होशंगाबाद में सेवाओं को जिसे औद्यौगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टि 21 के अन्तर्गत निर्दिष्ट किया गया है , उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवाएं घोषित किया जाना चाहिए ।

अतः अब , औद्यौगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947, ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप- खण्ड ( 6 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योंग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए तत्काल प्रभाव से छः मास की कालावधी के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।

[फा. संख्या एस-11017/16/97-आई. आर. ( पी. एल. ) ]

एस. कृष्णन , अपर सचिव New Delhi , the 15th January, 2008

S. O. 143. Whether the Central Government is satisfied that the public interest requires that the services inthe Security paper Mill , Hoshangabad which is covered by item 21 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , should be declared to be a Public Utility Service for the puposes of the said Act .

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -clause (vi ) ofclause (n ) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares with immediate effect the said industry to be a Public Utility Service for the purpose of the said Act for a period ofsix months .

[No.S- 11017/16/97 - IR (PL)] S. KRISHNAN , Addl . Secy .

331 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जनवरी 19 , 2008/पौष 29 , 1929

New Delhi , the 15th January, 2008 नई दिल्ली, 15 जनवरी , 2008

S. O. 144. Whereas the Central Government having been satisfied that the public interest so requires that in pursuance of the provisions of sub- clause ( vi ) of the clause(n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14of1947) , declared by the Notification ofthe Government of India in the Ministry of Labour, dated 19-6-2007 the services in Industry engaged in manufacture or production ofmineral oil (crude oil ) motor and aviation spirit, diesel oil , kerosene oil , fuel oil , diverse hydrocarbon oils and their blends including synthetic fuels , Lubricating oils and the likewhich is covered by item 26 of the First Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) to be a Public Utility Service for the purpose of the said Act, for a period ofsix months from the 16th July 2007.

का. आ. 144.-केन्द्रीय सरकार संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि लोकहित में ऐसा करना अपेक्षित था, औद्यौगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़) के उप- खण्ड (vi ) के उपबंधो के अनुसरण में भारत सरकार के श्रम और रोजगार मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. दिनांक 19-6-2007 द्वारा खनिज तेल ( कच्चा तेल ) , मोटर और विमानन स्पिरिट , डीजल तेल, मिट्टी का तेल, ईधन तेल, विविधा हाईड्रोकार्बन तेल और उनके मिश्रण जिनमें सिंथेटिक तेल और इसी प्रकार के तेल शामिल है के निर्माण या उत्पादन में लगे उद्योग में सेवाओं में है, जोकि औद्यौगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की प्रथम अनुसूची की प्रविष्टिः26 में शामिल है, को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 16-7-2007 से छः मास की कालावधि के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित किया था;

And whereas, the Central Government is of opinion that public interest requires the extension of the said period by a further period of six months.

और केन्द्रीय सरकार की राय है कि लोकहित में उक्त कालावधि को छः मास की और कालावधि के लिए बढ़ाया जाना अपेक्षित है;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by proviso to sub- clause (vi ) of clause (n) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , the Central Government hereby declares the said industry to be a public Utility Service for the purpose of the said Act, for a period of six months from the 16th Janaury 2008 .

अतः अब , औद्यौगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 , ( 1947 का 14 ) , की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( ढ़ ) के उप- खण्ड ( vi ) के परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त उद्योग को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों के लिए दिनांक 16-1-2008 से छः मास की कालावधी के लिए लोक उपयोगी सेवा घोषित करती है ।

[F. No. S- 11017/6/97- IR (PL) ]

S. KRISHNAN , Addl . Secy .

[फा. संख्या एस-11017/6/97- आई. आर. ( पी. एल. ) ] एस. कृष्णन , अपर सचिव

Printed by the Manager, Govt. of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi - 110054.