This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

REGD . NO . D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003-05 भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 8]

नई दिल्ली, फरवरी 17 फरवरी 23 , 2008 , शनिवार/माघ 28 फाल्गुन 4, 1929

No. 8

] NEW DELHI , FEBRUARY 17- FEBRUARY 23 , 2008, SATURDAY/MAGHA 28- PHALGUNA 4, 1929 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके । Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation .

भाग II-खण्ड उप- खण्ड (ii)

PART II Section 3-Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry ofDefence)

कार्मिक,'लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

( कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग )

(Department of Personnel and Training) नई दिल्ली , 8 फरवरी , 2008

New Delhi, the 8th February, 2008

S.O. 326. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946) , the Central Government hereby specifies that all the offences , including attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection therewith , under the Transplantation of Human Organs Act , 1994 (42 of 1994) shall be investigated by the Delhi SpecialPolice Establishment.

का.आ. 326. केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 काअधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि मानव अंग प्रतिरोपण अधिनियम , 1994 ( 1994 का अधिनियम सं. 42) के तहत सभी अपराधों तथा उपर्युक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्रों का अन्वेषण दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना द्वारा की जाएगी ।

[F. No. 228/ 12/2008-AVD- II] [फा. सं. 228/ 12/2008 -एवीडी- II ]

MANISHA SAXENA , Dy. Secy.

मनीषा सक्सेना , उप सचिव

470 GI /2008

(643) 644

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/ PHALGUNA 4, 1929

नई दिल्ली , 8 फरवरी , 2008

दिल्ली और दिल्ली उच्च न्यायालय में केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो के रिटेनर काउंसिल , को दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना द्वारा अन्वेषित मामलों से उद्भूत अभियोजनों , अपीलों, पुनरीक्षणों अथवा अन्य मामलों का संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है

[सं. 225/12/2007 - ए वी डी- II ] चंद्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th February, 2008 का.आ. 327. केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए हरियाणा राज्य के गृह विभाग की अधिसूचना सं. 20/2/2008-3एचजी -1 , दिनांक 31 जनवरी , 2008 द्वारा प्राप्त सहमति से पुलिस स्टेशन पालम विहार , जिला-पश्चिम गुड़गांव में दर्ज एफ आईआर सं. 27 , दिनांक 25 जनवरी , 2008 से संबंधित मानव अंग प्रतिरोपण अधिनियम, 1994 ( 1994 का अधिनियम सं. 42) की धारा 18 और 19 सहित उपर्युक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए तथा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किन्हीं अन्य अपराध अपराधों तक्षा भारतीय दंड संहिता , 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा420, 342 , 326, 506 और 120-बी के अधीन अपराधों का अम्वेषण करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार हरियाणा राज्य पर करती है ।

[फा. सं. 228/12/2008 -ए वी डी- II ]

S.O. 328. In exercise of the powers conferred by the provision of Sub- section (8 ) of Section 24 of the Code ofCriminal Procedure , 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Ashiesh Kumar , Advocate and Retainer Counsel of Central Bureau of Investigation in the Delhi High Court as Special Public Prosecutor for conducting prosecution , appeals , revision or other matter arising out of the cases investigated by the Delhi Special Police Establishment .

[No. 225/ 12/2007 -AVD- II ] मनीषा सक्सेना , उप सचिव

CHANDRA PRAKASH, Under Secy.

New Delhi , the 8th February, 2008

नई दिल्ली, 18 फरवरी , 2008

S.Q. 327. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of State ofHaryana, Home Department vide No. 20/2/2008-3HG- 1 , dated 31st January , 2008 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the State of Haryana for investigation of offences in connection with FIR No. 27 , dated 25th January, 2008 under Section 18 and 19 of the Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994 (42 of 1994) including attempts , abetments and conspirancies in relation to or in connection therewith or offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts and Sections 420, 342, 326, 506 and 120 -B ofthe Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No.45 of 1860) registered with the Police Station Palam Vihar, District West Gurgaon , Haryana.

का.आ. 329.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मेघालय राज्य सरकार , राजनीतिक विभाग की अधिसूचना सं. पीओएल 211/2007/45 , दिनांक 17 दिसंबर , 2007 द्वारा प्राप्त सहमति से फूलबाडी पुलिस थाना , वेस्ट गारो हिल्स, मेघालय में दर्ज मामला सं. 8 ( 4) 2006 से उद्भूत भारतीय दंड संहिता , 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 365 , के अधीन दण्डनीय अपराध और उक्त अपराध से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त. प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्रों और उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किन्हीं अन्य अपराधों का अन्वेषण करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार संपर्ण मेघालय राज्यं पर करती है ।

[No. 228/ 12/2008-AVD-II ]

[सं. 228/71 /2007- ए वी डी-11 ] MANISHA SAXENA, Dy . Secy .

चंद्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव नई दिल्ली, 14 फरवरी , 2008

New Delhi , the 18th February, 2008

S.O. 329. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 (Act No. 25 का.आ. 328. केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता , 1973( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए श्री आशीष कुमार, एडवोकेट, [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

645

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

of 1946), the Central Government with the consent ofState Government of Meghalaya, Political Department vide Notification No. POL. 211/2007/45, dated 17th December, 2007, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole ofthe State ofMeghalaya for investigation ofoffence punishable under Section 365 of the Indian panel Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) arising out ofcase No. 8 (4)2006 registered at Phulbari Police Station, West Garo Hills , Meghalaya and attempt abetment and conspirancies in relation to or in conneciton with the said offence, and any other offences committed in the course of the same transction or arising out of the same facts .

[No. 228/71 /2007-AVD- II] CHANDRA PRAKASH, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 18 फरवरी, 2008

का.आ. 330. केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य के गृह विभाग की अधिसूचना सं. 1029/6-पी-12-2008-6 ( 7 ) डी/08 दिनांक 10 फरवरी , 2008 द्वारा प्राप्त सहमति से अवैध गुर्दा प्रतिरोपण गिरोह के संबंध में मानव अंग प्रतिरोपण अधिनियम , 1994 ( 1994 का अधिनियम सं. 42) की धारा 18/19 , भारतीय दंड संहिता , 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45) की धारा 342 , 420 , 467 , 468 , 471 , 506 , 326, 120-बीऔर अनुसूचित जातियां और अनुसूचित जनजातियां ( अत्याचार निवारण) अधिनियम, 1989 ( 1989 का अधिनियम सं. 33 ) की धारा 3 ( 1 )( 10) के अधीन पुलिस स्टेशन सिविल लाइन्स, जिला- मुरादाबाद (उत्तर प्रदेश) में दर्ज मामला अपराध सं. 48/2008 तथा उपर्युक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षडयंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध अथवा अपराधों का अन्वेषण करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार संपर्ण उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य पर करती है ।

[सं. 228/16/2008- ए वी डी. 11 ]

चंद्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 18th February, 2008

S.O. 330. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) ofSection 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the State of Uttar Pradesh , Home Department conveyed vide

No. 1029/6-P - 12/2008-6(7) D/08 dated 10th February, 2008, hereby extends the powers andjurisdiction of the members ofthe Delhi Special Police Establishment to the State of Uttar Pradesh for investigation of offences in connection with Case Crime No. 48/2008 registered at P.S. Civil Lines, District Moradabad (U.P. ) under Sections 18/19 of the Transplantation of Human Organs Act , 1994 (42 of 1994) Sections 342, 420, 467,468, 471 , 506, 326, 120-B ofthe Indian PenalCode 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) and 3(1 )(X) of the Indian Penal code , 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) and 3 ( 1 )(X) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (33 of 89) regarding illegal kidney transplant racket and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with the offences mentioned above and any other offence or offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts .

[No.228/16/2008-AVD- II ] CHANDRA PRAKASH, under . Secy.

वित्त मंत्रालय

(राजस्व विभाग )

( केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )

नई दिल्ली, 12 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 331.-सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतंद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ 1-4-2007 से संगठन भारतीय संस्कृति दर्शन ट्रस्ट, पुणे को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से संलग्न ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थात्: -

(i ) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा ;

(ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामंकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा ;

(iii) अनुमेदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग बही खाता रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि को दर्शाएगा तथा, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उपधारा (2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिर्पाट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले 646

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ;

(iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिर्पाट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा । 2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(क) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अलग लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा (ख) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिर्पाट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा ; अथवा

(ग) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा (घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा

(ड. ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा । [ अधिसूचना सं. 24/2008 /फां. सं. 203/10/2007-आ.क.नि.- II ] सुरेन्द्रपाल, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue)

(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES ) NewDelhi, the 12th February, 2008

S.O. 331. It is hereby notified for general information that the orignization Bharatiya Sanskriti Darshan Trust, Pune has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause (ii ) ofsub- section (1) ofSection35 ofthe Income-tax Act, 1961 (said Act) , readwith Rules 5C and SE of the Income -tax Rules , 1962 (saidRules) , with effect from 1-4-2007 in the category of 'other Institution' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(1) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] ( iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountent as defined in the explanation to sub - section (2 ) of Section 288 of the said Act and frunish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income-tax or the Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of incomeunder sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 139 of the said Act;

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above.

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization: -

(a) fails to maintain separate book of accounts referred to in sub - paragraph ( iii) of paragraph 1; or

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub -paragraph ( iii) of paragraph 1 ; or (c) fails tofurnish its statement ofthe donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub- paragraph (iv) ofparagraph 1; or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii) of sub-section ( 1) of Section 35 of the said Act read with rules SC and SE of the said Rules .

[Notification No. 24/2008/F. No. 203 /10/2007/ITA- II ]

SURENDER PAL, Under Secy.

नईदिल्ली, 12 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 332. सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ 1-4-2001 से संगठन बिरला रिसर्च इस्टीट्यूट फार अपलाईड साइसेंस , नागडा (मध्य प्रदेश) को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

647

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

कार्यकलापों में लगी ' अन्य संस्था ' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है, अर्थात्: -

(i) अनुमेदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा ;

(ii ) अनुमेदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा;

( iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता बही रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उपधारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;

( iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेख्खा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा । 2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन :-

(क) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित पृथक लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा (ख ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिर्पाट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा ; अथवा

(ग) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप -पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा (घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा

(ड.) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5ग और 5ङ के साथ 'पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा (1) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 26/2008/फा. सं. 203/24/2004-आ.क.नि. - 11 ] सुरेन्द्र पाल, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 12th February, 2008 S.O. 332. It is hereby notified for general information that the orignization Birla Research Institute forApplied Sciences , Nagda (M.P. ) has been approvedby the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 35 of the Income -tax 1961 (said Act) , read with Rules 5C and 5E of the Income-tax Rules , 1962 (said Rules ) , with effect from 1-4-2001 in the category of ' other Institution ' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions, namely:-

(1) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students ;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research, reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub-section (2) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income- tax or the Director of Income-tax havingjurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 139 of the said Act;

(iv) , The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor, shall accompany the report of audit referred to above.

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval ifthe approved organization:-

(f) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub - paragraph ( iii) of paragraph 1; or

(g) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub-paragraph (iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or (h) fails to furnish its statement ofthe donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub -paragraph (iv) ofparagraph 1 ; or

(i) ceases to carry on its research activities o its research activities are not found to b genuine; or

(1) ceases to conform to and comply with th provisions of clause ( ii ) of sub - section ( 1 648

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

ofsection 35 of the said Act read with rules SC and SE of the said Rules .

[NotificationNo. 26/2008 /F . No. 203 /24/2004/ITA -II ]

SURENDER PAL , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 12 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 333.-सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5 ग और 5 ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ 1-4-2003 से संगठन डालमिया इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ साइंटिफिक एण्ड इंडस्ट्रियल रिसर्च , राजगंगपुर , उड़ीसा को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से संलग्न अन्य सांस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थात्: - (i ) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा ;

(i ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा ;

(iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग बही - खाता रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान कार्य करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि को दर्शाएगा तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उपधारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी दीखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि बैंक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ;

(iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा । : 2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(क) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप - पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अलग लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा (ख ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा ; अथवा

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

(ग ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान काअपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा

(ड. ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5 ङ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 25/2008/फा. सं. 203 /29/2004- आ.का.नि. 11 ]

सुरेन्द्र पाल , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 12th February, 2008

S.O. 333. It is hereby notified for general information that the orignization Dalmia Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research , Rajgangpur, Orissa has beenapprovedby the Central Government for the purpose of clause (ii) of sub - section ( 1 ) of section 35 of the Income -tax 1961 (said Act), read with Rules 5C and 5E of the Income-tax Rules , 1962 (said Rules ), with effect from 1-4-2001 in the category of ' other Institution' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions, namely:-

(i) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students ;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section (2) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income- tax or the Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 139 of the said Act;

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization:---

(a) fails to maintain separate books ofaccounts referred to in sub - paragraph ( iii) of paragraph 1 ; or 649 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub-paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub-paragraph ( iv) ofparagraph 1; or

केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा औद्योगिक और वित्तीय पुनर्निर्माण बोर्ड (बाइफर ) में सदस्य/अध्यक्ष के पद पर श्री ए. के. गोस्वामी का कार्यकाल दिनांक16-3-2008 से 30-10-2008 तक अर्थात् उनकी आयु 65 वर्ष हो जाने तक या बाइफर को बंद किए जाने तक या अगले आदेश होने तक, जो भी पहले हो , बढ़ाने का अनुमोदन करती है ।

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or

[फा. सं. 20( 1 )/2004- आईएफ-II ] खड्ग सिंह , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 18th February, 2008 (e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii ) of sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the said Act read with rules5C and 5E of the said Rules .

[Notification No. 25/2008/F . No. 203/29 /2004/ITA- II ] SURENDER PAL, Under Secy.

(वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 14 फरवरी , 2008

S.O. 335. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (2) of Section 4 read with sub- section (2) of Section 6 of the Sick Industrial Companies ( Special Provisions) Act, 1985, the Central Government hereby approves the extension of the tenure of Shri A.K. Goswami asMember/Chairman in BIFR from 16-3-2008 to 30-10-2008 i.e. upto the age of attaining 65 years or till the abolition of BIFR or until further orders , whichever event occurs the earliest.

[F. No. 20( 1)/2004- IF - II] KHARG SINGH, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 19 फरवरी , 2008

का.आ. 334.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खंड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित् बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उप - धारा 3 ( ज ) और ( 3 - क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा श्रीमती जोगिन्दर कौर को इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक, जो भी पहले हो , इलाहाबाद बैंक के निदेशक मंडल में अंशकालिक गैर-सरकारी निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।

[फा. सं. 9/22/2006-बीओ-I ] जी.बी. सिंह, उप सचिव

(Department of Financial Services) New Delhi , the 14th February, 2008

का.आ. 336. - राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम , 1970/1980 के खंड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उप - धारा 3 ( ज) और ( 3 - क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा श्री अशोक सिंह को अधिसूचना की तिथि से तीन वर्षों की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक , जो भी पहले हो , यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के निदेशक मंडल में अंशकालीन गैर- सरकारी निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. 9/4/2006-बीओ- I ] जी.बी. सिंह , उप सचिव

NewDelhi , the 19th February , 2008 S.O. 334. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section 3 (h ) and ( 3 -A) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer ofUndertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub- clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 of the Nationalised Banks ( Management & Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme , 1970/1980, the Central Government hereby nominates Smt. Joginder Kaur as part -time non- official director on the Board of Directors of Allahabad Bank for a period of three years from the date of notification and/or until further orders , whichever is earlier .

[F. No. 9/22/2006-BO- I ] G.B. SINGH, Dy. Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 18 फरवरी , 2008

S.O. 336. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section 3 ( h) and (3 -A) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer of Undertakings ) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub- clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 of the Nationalised Banks (Management & Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme , 1970/1980, the Central Government hereby nominates Sh. Ashok Singh as part-time non - official director on the Board of Directors of Union Bank of India for a period of three years from the date of notification or until further orders , whichever is earlier .

का.आ. 335. रुग्ण औद्योगिक कंपनी ( विशेष उपबंध ) अधिनियम , 1985 की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) के साथ पठित धारा 4 की उप- धारा (2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए,

[F. No. 9/4/2006-BO-I] G.B. SINGH, Dy. Secy.

650

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/ PHALGUNA 4 , 1929

स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय (स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 27 सितम्बर , 2007

का.आ. 337.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 (1956 का 102) की धारा 12 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम की द्वितीय अनुसूची में एत‌द्वारा निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्:-

उक्त अनुसूची में" नेपाल " शीर्षक के अंतर्गत- (क) त्रिभुवन विश्वविद्यालय " के सामने ( इसके पश्चात् स्तंभ (2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ) डिप्लोमा में यथा उल्लिखित अर्हताओं की प्रकृति [ इसके पश्चात् स्तंभ ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] और ' संक्षेपण' [ इसके पश्चात् स्तंभ ( 4 ) के रूप में संदर्भित] शीर्षकों के अन्तर्गत अंतिम प्रविष्टि और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित जोड़ा जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

(2)

(3)

(4) " मास्टर्स आफ सर्जरी

त्रिभुवन "एम एस

( ई.एन.टी. ) "

(ई.एन.टी. )"

विश्वविद्यालय ( यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा ) अर्हता होगी यदि यह चिकित्सा संस्थान, महाराजगंज , काठमांडू, नेपाल में प्रशिक्षण ले रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में त्रिभुवन विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा प्रदान की गईं हो ) ।

(ख ) शीर्षक " बी.पी. कोईराला स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान संस्थान धरान नेपाल के सामने [ इसके पश्चात् स्तंभ ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] डिप्लोमा में यथा उल्लिखित अर्हताओं की प्रक्रति [इसके पश्चात स्तंभ ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] और ' संक्षेपण' [ इसके पश्चात्स्तंभ ( 4 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] शीर्षकों के अन्तर्गत अंतिम प्रविष्टि और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित जोड़ा जाएगा, अर्थात्:-

(4)

(3)

(2)

" मास्टर्स आफ सर्जरी ( विक्लांग विज्ञान ) " बी.पी.के. आई.एच.एस. , धरान , नेपाल "एम एस (आर्थो. ) "

[फा. सं. वं-1015/8/2003 - एम.ई. ( पी-1 ) ]

टी.जे. एस. चावला , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE (Department of Health & Family Welfare) New Delhi , the 27th September , 2007 S.O. 337. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (2) of the Section 12 of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 (102 of 1956) , the Central Government , after consulting the Medical Council of India , hereby makes the following further amendments in the Second Schedule to the said Act, namely :-

In the said Schedule under the heading "Nepal "- (a) against " Tribhuvan University" , under the headings ' Title ' ( hereinafter referred to as column (2 ) ] , 'Nature of qualifications as stated in diploma' ( hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ) and ' Abbreviation ' ( hereinafter referred to as column (4 ) ) , after the last entry and entry relating thereto the following shall be inserted , namely:-

(4)

(2)

(3)

Tribhuvan " Masters of Surgery (Ε.Ν.Τ. ) "

" MS (E.N.T. ) " University

(Thisshall be recognized medical qualification when granted by Tribhuvan Uni- versity in respect of students being trained at Institute of Medicine, Maharaj Gunj , Kathmandu, Nepal )

(b) Against " B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences , Dharan , Nepal " , under the heading ' Title ' [hereinafter referred to as column (2 ) ] , ' Nature of qualifications as stated in diploma ' ( hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ] and " Abbreviation " ( hereinafter referred to as column (4) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto the following shall be inserted , namely :-

(4)

(3)

(2)

"M.S.

B.P.K.I.H.S. , Dharan,Nepal

(Orhto. ) " ( Orthopaedics ) " "Masters of Surgery

[F. No. V. 11015/8/2003 - Μ.Ε. (P - 1) ]

T.J.S. CHAWLA , Under Secy .

(स्वास्थ्यविभाग) नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी , 2008

A का.आ. 338.-केन्द्रीय सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करके उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है ; अर्थात्:-

2. अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम.सं. 70 के बाद और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के पश्चात् निम्नलिखित क्रमांक और प्रविष्टियां अंतःस्थापित की जाएंगी:-

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

651

भारत का राजपत्र फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4,1929

" 71. मीनाक्षी एकाडेमी ऑफ मीनाक्षी अम्माल डेंटल कालेज हायर एजुकेशन (सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , चैन्नई चैन्नई एंड हास्पिटल ,

1. अर्थोडॉन्टिक्स (यदि 13-2-2007 को या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो)

एमडीएस ( अर्थोडॉन्टिक्स) मीनाक्षी एकाडेमी ऑफ हायर एजूकेशन (सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , चैन्नई II. प्रोस्थोडॉन्टिक्स (यदि 13-2-2007 को या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

एमडीएस (प्रोस्थेडॉन्टिक्स ) मीनाक्षी एकाडेमी ऑफ हायर एजूकेशन (सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , चैन्नई III. कन्जरवेटिव डेन्टिस्ट्री ( यदि 13-2-2007 को या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

एमडीएस ( कन्जरवेटिव डेंटिस्ट्री ) मीनाक्षी एकाडेमी ऑफ हायर एजूकेशन (सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , चैन्नई IV. ओरल सर्जरी (यदि 13-2-2007 को या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

एमडीएस (ओरल सर्जरी ) मीनाक्षी एकाडेमी ऑफ हायर एजूकेशन (सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , चैन्नई V. पेरियोडॉन्टिस (यदि 13-2-2007 को या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

एमडीएस (पेरियोंडॉन्टिस ) मीनाक्षी एकाडेमी ऑफ हायर एजूकेशन (सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , चैन्नई VL ओरल पैथोलोजी (यदि 13-2-2007 को या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

एमडीएस(ओरल पेथोलोजी ) मीनाक्षी एकाडेमी ऑफ हायर एजुकेशन (सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , चैन्नई VII .पेडोडॉन्टिक्स (यदि 13-2-2007 को या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो)

एमडीएस ( पेडोडॉन्टिक्स ) मीनाक्षी एकाडेमी ऑफ हायेंरे एजूकेशन (सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , चैन्नई

[फा. सं. वी-12017/9/2001 -डी.ई. ]

राज सिंह, अवर सचिव (Department ofHealth)

New Delhi , the I 1th January, 2008 S.O. 338. -In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (2) of the Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948) , the Central Government, after consultation with Dental Council of India, hereby, makes the following amendments in Part- I of the Schedule to the said Act, namely :-

470G1/08-2

2. InPart-I ofthe Schedule , after serial No. 70, and the entries relating thereto , the following serial number and entries shall be inserted, namely :-

Meenakshi Ammal Dental College & Hospital , Chennai

" 71. Meenakshi Academy ofHigher Education (Deemed University) , Chennai

(1) Orthodontics (Whengranted on or after 13-2-2007)

MDS (Orthodotics) Meenakshi Academy ofHigher Education (Deemed University) , Chennal

(ii) Prosthodontics (When granted on or after 13-2-2007)

MDS ( Prosthodontics ) Meenakshi Academy ofHigher Education (Deemed University), Chennai

(iii) Conservative Dentistry (When granted on or after13-2-2007)

MDS (Conservative Dentistry) Meenakshi Academy ofHigher Education (Deemed University ) , Chennai

(iv) Oral Surgery (When granted on or after 13-2-2007)

MDS (Oral Surgery) Meenakshi Academy ofHigher Education (Deemed University), Chennai

(v) Periodontics (When granted on or after 13-2-2007)

MDS (Periodontics) Meenakshi Academy ofHigher Education (Deemed University) , Chennai

(vi) Oral Pathology (When granted on or after 13-2-2007)

MDS (OralPathology) Meenakshi Academy ofHigher Education (Deemed University), Chennai

(vii) Pedodonitics (Whengranted on or after 13-2-2007)

MDS (Pedodontics) Meenakshi Academy ofHigher Education (Deemed University) , Chennai

[No. V- 12017/9/2001 -D.E. ]

RAJ SINGH , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 18 जनवरी , 2008

का.आ. 339.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 (1956 का 102 ) के प्रयोजनों के लिए इस्लामिक आजाद यूनिवर्सिटी, ईरान द्वारा प्रदत्त चिकित्सा अर्हता डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन 652

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4 , 1929

उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अन्तर्गत एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है;

भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102) के प्रयोजनों के लिए राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , बंगलौर, भारत द्वारा प्रदत्त चिकित्सा अर्हता डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता है ;

और डा. अजादेह तबताबेई, ईरानी नागरिक जो उक्त अर्हताएं धारण करते हैं , पीजीआईएमईआर , चंडीगढ़ से प्रशिक्षण ना कि व्यक्तिगत लाभ के प्रयोजनार्थ संलग्न हैं;

अतःअब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा विनिर्दिष्ट करती है कि भारत में डा. अजादेह तबताबेई के चिकित्सा व्यवसाय कीअवधि:-

(क) 15-01-2008 से पांच माह की अवधि तक;

(ख) उस अवधि तक जिसके दौरान डा. अजादेह तबतादेई पीत्रीआईएमईआर , चंडीगढ़ में विकृति विज्ञान विभाग से संलग्न हैं , इनमें से जो भी लघुतर हो , परिसीमित होगी ।

[सं वी-11016/01 /2007 - एमई ( नीति-1 ) ( XVII ) पार्ट]

के.वी.एस. राव , उप सचिव New Delhi, the 18th January, 2008 S.O. 339. Whereas medical qualification Doctor ofMedicine granted by Islamic Azad University , Iran is a recognized medical qualification for the purpose of the IndianMedical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) under Section 14 of the said Act ;

Whereas medical qualification Doctor of Medicine granted by Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences , Bangalore, India is a recognized medical qualification for the purpose of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of1956);

And whereas Dr. Azadeh Tabtabaei , Iranian National , who posses the said qualifications is attached to PGIMER, Chandigarh for the purpose oftraining and not for personal gain;

Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause ( c) of sub- section ( 1 ) of the Section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies that the period of practice of medicine by Dr. Azadeh Tabatabaei in India shall be limited to :

(a) a period of five months w.e.f. from 15-01-2008;

: (b) the period during which Dr. Azadeh Tabatabaei is attached to Dept. of Pathology at PGIMER, Chandigarh whichever is shorter .

[No. V- 11016/01/07-ME(Policy -I (XVII) Pt. ]

K.V.S. PAO , Dy. Secy.

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2008

का.आ. 340.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 (1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ग) के अनुसरण में केन्द्र सरकार ने महाराष्ट्र के पंजीकृत चिकित्सा स्नातक चुनाव क्षेत्र से चुनाव करवाया है जिसके तहत डा. पवार वसन्त निवरूती, गौतम , सुश्रुत अस्पताल, न्यू पंडित कालोनी , नासिक को इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् का सदस्य निर्वाचित किया गया है ।

अतः , अब , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में , केन्द्र सरकार तत्कालीन स्वास्थ्य मंत्रालय , भारत सरकार कीदिनांक 9 जनवरी , 1960 की. अधिसूचना , का.आ. संख्या 138 में एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्:-

उक्त अधिसूचना में ' धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) के अंतर्गत निर्वाचित ' शीर्षक के नीचे क्रम संख्या 01 तथा उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी , अर्थात्:-

" 1. डा. पवार बसन्त निवरूती गौतम, सुश्रुत अस्पताल , न्यूपंडित कालोनी, नासिक-422002. "

[सं. वी -11013/07/2006-एम.ई. (नीति-1 ) ]

के.वी.एस. राव , उप सचिव New Delhi , the 15th February, 2008 S.O. 340. -Whereas the Central Government in pursuance of clause (c) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) has conducted the election from the Registered Medical Graduate Constituency of Maharashtra wherefrom Dr. Pawar Vasant Nivruti , Gautam, Sushrut Hospital , New PanditColony, Nasik has been elected to be a member of the Medical Council of India with effect from the date of issue of this notification .

Now, therefore , in pursuance of the provision of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendment in the Notification ofthe Government of India in the then Ministry of Health number S.O. 138 , dated the 9thJanuary, 1960 , namely :-

In the said notification , under the heading ' Elected under clause ( c) of sub -section ( 1) of Section 3 ' , for the serial No. 1 and the entries relating thereto the following serial number and entries shall be substituted, namely :-

" 1. Dr. Pawar Vasant Nivruti

Gautam, Sushrut Hospital , New Pandit Colony,

Nasik -422 002 "

[No. V- 11013 /07/2006- ME(Policy- I) ]

K.V.S. RAO, Dy. Secy.

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

653

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

विदेश मंत्रालय (सी. पी. वी. , खण्ड ) नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2008

का.आ. 341. - राजनयिक कौसली अधिकारी (शपथ एवं शुल्क) अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 41 वां ) के 2 के अंक (क) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा भारत का प्रधान कौंसलावास, ' बर्मिंघम में श्री माम राजबेहामनी , सहायक को 15-2-2008 से सहायक कौंसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करप्ती है ।

[सं. टी-4330/01/2006]

प्रीतम लाल, अवर सचिव (कांउसुलर) MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(C.P.V. Division) NewDelhi , the 15th February, 2008 S.O. 341. In pursuance of the clause ( a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 , the Central Government hereby authorize Shri Mam Raj Behamni , Assistant to perform the duties of Assistant Consular Officer in the Consulate General of India, Birmingham with effect from 15th February,2008.

[No. T. 4330/1/2006] PRITAM LAL, Under Secy. ( Counsular) वाणिज्य और उद्योग मंत्रालय (वाणिज्य विभाग )

आदेश नई दिल्ली, 5 फरवरी , 2008

का.आ. 342. केन्द्रीय सरकार निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम , 1963 ( 1963 का 22 ) की धारा 6 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह राय है कि भारत के निर्यात व्यापार के विकास के लिए ऐसा करना आवश्यक और समीचीन है किहॉपस और हॉप उत्पादों को निर्यात से पूर्व क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण के अधीन लाया जाए;

और, यह आवश्यक है कि आयातित देशों के विहित मानकों को पूरा करने के लिए क्वालिटी के उच्चतम मानकों और अनुबद्ध स्वास्थ्यअपेक्षाओं को बनाया रखा जाए ।

और प्रसंस्करणकर्ता/निर्यातक का प्राथमिक दायित्व है कि वह यह सुनिश्चित करे कि हॉपस और हॉप उत्पाद इस प्रस्ताव में अधिकथित अपेक्षाओं को पूरा करें ।

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार द्वारा नाम निर्दिष्ट सक्षम प्राधिकारी को देश में क्वालिटी मानकों को सुनिश्चित करना चाहिए । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त प्रयोजनों के लिए नीचे विनिर्दिष्ट प्रस्ताव बनाए हैं और उन्हें निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) नियम , 1964 के नियम 11 के उपनियम ( 2 ) की अपेक्षानुसार निर्यात निरीक्षण परिषद् को भेज दिया है ,

जब , निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) नियम, 1964 केनियम 11 के उपनियम ( 2 ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त प्रस्तावों को ऐसे लोगों की जानकारी के लिए प्रकाशित करती है जिनके उनसे प्रभावित होने की संभावना थी और यह सूचना दी जाती है कि कोई भी व्यक्ति प्रस्तावों के संबंध में कोई भी आक्षेप या सुझाव देना चाहता है तो वह उन्हें इस आदेश के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से 30 दिनों के भीतर भारतीय निर्यात निरीक्षण परिषद् तीसरा तल , नई दिल्ली वाईएमसीए कल्चरल सेंटर बिल्डिंग , 1 , जयसिंह रोड, नई दिल्ली-110001 को भेज सकता है ।

प्रस्ताव

( 1 ) यह अधिसूचित करना कि हॉपस और हॉप उत्पाद निर्यात से पूर्व क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण के अधीन होंगे ;

(2) इस आदेश से संलग्न उपाबंध में अधिकथित हॉपस और हॉप उत्पाद निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण , निरीक्षण और मानीटरिंग ) नियम , 2007 के अनुसार क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण के प्रकार को प्ररूपानुसार विनिर्दिष्ट करना;

(3) इस आदेश में संलग्न अनुसूची में यथावर्णित विनिर्देशों को हॉपस और हॉप उत्पादों के लिए मानक विनिर्देश के रूप में मान्यता देना;

(4) यूरोपियन यूनियन ( ईयू) के अनुक्रम में हॉपस और हॉप उत्पाद के निर्यात को उस दशा में प्रतिषिद्ध करना जब वह उसे लागू मान विनिर्देश के अनुरूप हो और उसके साथ निरीक्षण प्रमाणपत्र न हो कि ऐसी इकाई निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम, 1963 की धारा 7 के अधीन स्थापित अभिकरण द्वारा अनुमोदित ओर उसके द्वारा उसकी मानीटरिंग की जाती है, जिसमें उपकार्यालय ज़ो विभिन्न क्षेत्रों में स्थित हैं, सम्मिलित हैं!

अनुसूची

निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम, 1963 की धारा 6 के अनुसार मान्यताप्राप्त हॉपस ओर हॉप उत्पाद के लिए विनिर्देश निम्नलिखित होंगे :-

(क) आयातकर्ता देश के राष्ट्रीय मानक, या

(ख) विदेशी क्रेता और निर्यातकों के बीच करार पाए गए संविदात्मक विनिर्देश और परन्तु यह तब जब वे आयातकर्ता देशों की स्वास्थ्य अपेक्षाओं को पूरा कर रहें हों ,

(ग ) उपरोक्त ( क ) और ( ख ) मदों की अनुपस्थिति में, इस आदेश की इस अनुसूची की परिशिष्ट के अनुसार आदेश में यथाअनुद्ध न्यूनतम विनिर्देश ।

[फा. सं. 3/54/2007/ईआईईपी एण्ड ईपी] वी.के. गाबा, उप सचिव 654

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

अनुबन्ध

हॉपर्स और हाँप उत्पादों के विनिर्देश

( 1) अल्फा एसिड की मात्रा

हॉप उत्पाद (पाउडर , ज्यादा लूपलीन मात्रा वाला पाउडर , हॉपस का संपीडत और मिक्सड हॉपस ) की अल्फा एसिड मात्रा जिनसे हॉपस बनाई गयी है से कम ना हो ।

(2) हॉपस कानस के लिए न्यूनतम अपेक्षाएं

अधिकतम मात्रा

क्र. विशेषताएं

सं.

(वजन का प्रतिशत )

(च) ज्यादा मात्रा वाला लूपलीन हॉप चूर्ण से हॉपस के पत्ते , डंडी, बैक्टस और आक्ष को मशीनों द्वारा निकालने के पश्चात् पिसा हुआ उत्पाद अभिप्रेत हैं ।

(छ) हॉपस का अर्क से हॉप पाउडर या हॉपस चूर्ण पर शोध क्षमता द्वारा की गई क्रिया से संद्रित उत्पाद अभिप्रेत है ;

(ज) मिश्रित हॉपस उत्पाद से खंड ड से खंड छ तक दिए गये हॉप उत्पादों के उच्चतर मात्रा सहित हॉप , हॉप चूर्ण दो या दो से अधिक के मिश्रण अभिप्रेत हैं;

हॉपस बिना

तैयार किए गए

तैयार हॉपस.

(1) (2)

(4)

(3)

14 1. आर्द्रता

2. पत्ते और डंठल

3. हॉपस अपव्यय

4. 1 बीज रहित हॉपस 2

बीज की दशा में

3. निरीक्षण या प्रमाणीकरण का प्रकार :- भारत के निर्यात हॉपस और हॉप उत्पाद की क्वालिटी और सुरक्षा इस आदेश में सुनिश्चित किए जायेगें और इन उत्पादों के व्यापार को सुकर बनाने के लिए , कोई भी एक या दो प्रकार के निरीक्षण/प्रमाणीकरण प्रणाली निम्नलिखित है , का अनुसरण किया जाएगा , अर्थात्

( 1 ) अल्फा एसिड की मात्रा, आर्द्रता , बाहय तत्व ( पत्ते , डंठल, हाप अपव्यय ) और बीज ( बीज रहित हॉपस के मामले में ) और परेषणाघ्रार निरीक्षण को सुनिश्चित करने के लिए और;

(2) प्रसंस्करणषार्ता द्वारा माल विनिर्माण प्रैक्टिस जीएमपी/अच्छी स्वास्थ्यकर प्रैक्टिस जीएचपी के कार्यान्वयन जैसे क्वालिटी उत्पाद की प्रणाली प्रस्ताव सहित;

परिशिष्ट

निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम , 1963 की धारा 17 के अधीन बनाए जाने के लिए प्रस्तावित प्रारूप नियम 1. संक्षिप्त नाम और प्रारम्भ ( 1 ) इन नियमों का संक्षिप्त नाम हॉपस और हॉप उत्पाद निर्यात (क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और मानीटरिंग ) नियम, 2008 है ।

होंगे । (2) यह राजपत्र में उनके प्रकाशन की तारीख को प्रवृत् 2. परिभाषाएं- इन नियमों में, जब तक कि संदर्भ से अन्यथा अपेक्षित न हों;

(क) अधिनियम से निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम, 1963 ( 1963 का 22 ) अभिप्रेत है ।

(ख) अभिकरण से अधिनियम की धारा 7 उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन निर्याति निरीक्षण अभिकरण चैन्नई, दिल्ली , कोलकाता, कोच्ची और मुम्बई में स्थापित में से कोई अभिप्रेत है ;

( ग ) परिषद् से निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम, 1963 की धारा 3 के अधीन स्थापित निर्यात निरीक्षण परिषद् अभिप्रेत है;

(घ) सक्षम प्राधिकारी से निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम , 1963 की धारा 7 के अधीन चैन्नई, दिल्ली , कोच्ची, कोलकता और मुम्बई में स्थापित कोई एक निर्यात निरीक्षण अभिकरण अभिप्रेत है;

(ङ) हॉपस से सुखे पुष्प समूह और मादा हॉप बेल के कॉनस से भी जाने जाते हैं , यह पुष्प समूह दिखने में हरे , पीले और अंडाकार , एक फूल डंडी सहित लबाई 2 से 5 सें.मी. तक अभिप्रेत हैं;

4. अनुपालन का आधार

4.1 निर्यात के लिए हॉपस और हॉप उत्पाद का आशयित परेषण का इस अनुसूची के उपाबंध में अधिसूचित मानकों को पूरा करेंगे ।

4.2 प्रणाली पहुँच के अधीन प्रमाणीकरण (क) उद्योग या प्रसंस्करणकर्ता 'का यह प्राथमिक उत्तरदायित्व होगा कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि निर्यात के लिये आशयित हॉपस और हॉप उत्पाद के उत्पादन , भंडारण और परिवहन के सभी प्रक्रमों में उचित स्वास्थ्यकर दशाओं में संभाले और प्रंसस्कृत किए जाए और यह कि उत्पाद अधिनियम की धारा 6 के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार द्वारा आदेश में दिए गए विनिर्देशों के अनुरूप है ।

(ख) सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियमित रूप से स्थापन की मानीटरिंग करके सुनिश्चित करेगा कि जो हॉपस और हॉप उत्पाद के उत्पादन , भंडारण और परिवहन के सभी प्रक्रमों पर स्थापित द्वारा अच्छी विनिर्माण प्रैक्टिस ( जीएमपी ) और अच्छी स्वास्थ्यकर प्रैक्टिस (जीएचपी ) अपनाई जा रही है । स्कीम की प्रभावी मोदिरी के लिए निर्यात निरीक्षण परिषद् द्वारा इस संबंध में आवश्यक अनुदेश जारी किए जाएंगे ।

(ग) इसका समाधान होने पर कि स्थापन क्रियाकलापों यदि किए जाते उनकी प्रकृति से संबंधित अपेक्षाओं की पूर्ति करता है, सक्षम प्राधिकारी को ऐसे स्थापन को अनुमोदन प्रदान करेगा । परिषद् अनुमोदित स्थापनों की सूची तैयार करेगा , जिसमें प्रत्येक में एक कार्यालय की संख्या होगी ।

5. पैकिंग एवं चिन्ह

(क) निर्यात के लिए हॉपस और हॉप उत्पाद को पैक करने का आशय रखने वाला कोई निर्यातक नियमों के अनुसार परेषण 655 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

8.अपील

तैयार करने के पश्चात्स्वच्छता पूर्वक साफ खाद्यः पैकिंग सामग्री में पैक करेगा।

(ख) प्रत्येक पैकिंग पर आसानी से पढी जा सकने वाली निम्नलिखित सूचनाओं को स्थायी रूप से चिन्हित किए जाए, अर्थात्ः

1. प्रसंस्करणकर्ता या विनिर्माता का नाम और पता

2. निर्यातक का नाम और पता

निर्यात निरीक्षण अभिकरण के विनिश्चय से व्यथित कोई भी आवेदक ऐसे इंकार किए जाने की सूचना की प्राप्ति के 10 दिनों के भीतर अभिकरण द्वारा अपील निदेशक ( निरी. और क्वा. नियंत्रण) को भेजी जाएगी । अपील का निपटान इसकी प्राप्ति के 15 दिनों के भीतर कर दिया जाएगा । इस अपील पर निदेशक ( निरी. और क्या. नियंत्रण) का विनिश्चय अंतिम होगा

3. सामग्री का नाम और श्रेणी अभिधान

MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY 4. बैच और लॉट संख्या

5. प्रसंस्करण या विनिर्माण का वर्ष , मास और तारीख

(DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE) ORDER

New Delhi, the 5th February, 2008

6. कुल दव्यमान और कुल दव्यमानं

7. भारत में उत्पाद

8. पोत चिन्ह

6. यूरोपीय संघ के लिए स्वास्थ्य प्रमाणपत्र जारी करना समतुल्यता का सत्यपान

S.O. 342. Whereas in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 6 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 (22 of 1963 ), the Central Government is of the opinion that it is necessary and expedient so to do for the development of the export trade of India that Hops and Hop products should be subject to quality control and inspection prior to export ;

And, whereas it is necessary to maintain the highest quality standards and stipulated health requirements that would encompass the standards prescribed by the importing countries;

सक्षम प्राधिकारी यूरोपीय संघ के लिए स्वास्थ्य प्रमाणपत्र/समतुल्यता का सत्यापन दो कार्य दिवसों के भीतर जारी करेगा रिपोर्ट का आधार निम्नलिखित प्रपत्र में या किसी अन्य प्रपत्र में जिसमें अतिरिक्त शर्ते प्रमाणित की गयी हैं, यदिकोई है, निम्नलिखित रिपोटों के आधार पर आयातित देशों की अपेक्षाओं पर आधारित होगा, अर्थात

And, whereas, it is the primary responsiblity of the processor or exporter to ensure that Hops and Hop Products should meet the requirements laid down in the proposal:

1. प्रयोगशाला परीक्षण ( णों ) में निर्धारित मापदंडों की पुष्टि सूक्ष्मजैविक परीक्षण सहित मानक ( यदि लागू हों)

And whereas, the Competent Authority nominated by the Central Government should ensure the effective compliance of the quality standards in the country;

2. प्रयोगशाला परीक्षण में अतिरिक्त मापदंडों को दर्शाते हुए स्वास्थ्य प्रमाणपत्र में साफतौर पर आयातित देश की अपेक्षाओं के अनुसार परेषण पर दर्शाते हुए अनुपालन किया जाएगा ।

3. क्षेत्रीय निरीक्षण रिपोर्ट ( एफआईआर ) ( यदि लागू हो )

And whereas , the Central Government has formulated the proposal specified below for the said purpose and has forwarded the same to the Export Inspection Council as required under sub-rule 11 of the Export(Quality Control and Isnpection) Rules , 1964;

4. प्रत्येक जारी स्वास्थ्य प्रमाणपत्र/अन्य प्रमाणपत्र पर 200 रूपए शुल्क प्रभारित किया जाएगा ।

7. प्रमाणीकरण शुल्क

आवेदक द्वारा निर्यात निरीक्षण अभिकरण (ईआईए ) को निम्नलिखित दरों से प्रमाणीकरण शुल्क का भुगतान किया जाएगा, अर्थात:-

परेषण का

(क) परेषणावार प्रमाणीकरणः परेषण

(एफओबी)

Now, therefore, in pursuance of sub-rule (2) of rule 11 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Rules , 1964, the Central Government hereby publishes the proposal for information ofthe general public likely to be affected thereby, and notice is hereby given that any person who desires to make any objection or suggestion with respect to the said proposal may forward the same , withinthirty days from the date of publication of the Order inthe Official Gazette, to the Export Inspection Council of India, 3rd Floor , New Delhi YMCA Cultural Centre Building, 1, Jai Singh Road, New Delhi - 110001 .

मूल्य0.4% पोत

PROPOSAL

पर्यन्त भाड़े की

दरसे

(1) To notify that Hops and Hop Products shall be subjected toquality control and inspection prior to export ;

परेषण का

(ख) प्रणाली प्रमाणीकरण

(एफओबी)

मूल्य 0.2% पोत

.पर्यन्त भाड़े की

( 2) To specify the type of quality control and inpection in accordance with the draft Export of Hops and Hop Products ( Quality Control , Isnpection and Monitoring) Rules , 2007 set out in the Annexure appended to this Order;

दरसे 656

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4 , 1929

(3 ) To recognise the specifications as set out in the Schedule as appended to this Order as the standard specification for Hops and Hop Products ; and

(4) To prohibit the export of Hops and Hop Products incase of exports to European Union (EU) unless it conforms to the standard specifications applicable to it and is accompanied by a certificate of inspection or certificate that such unit is approved and monitored by the Export InspectionAgency established under section 7 of the Export (QualityControl and Inspection) Act, 1963 including its sub offices located at various places of the region .

SCHEDULE

Specification for Hops and Hop Products recognised as per section6 ofthe Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 shallbe:-

(a) Of national standards of the importing countries; or

(b) Contractual specifications agreed to between the foreign buyer and the exporters provided the same are satisfying the health requirements of the importing countries ;

(c) In the absence of items (a) and (b ) above , the minimum specifications as stipulated in this Order as Appendix to this Schedule.

[F. No. 3/54/2007 -ΕΙ&ΕΡ ]

V. K. GAUBA , Dy. Secy.

APPENDIX

SPECIFICATIONS OF HOPS AND HOP PRODUCTS 1. Alfa AcidContent:

The alfa acid content of hop products (powder , powder with higher lupulin content, extract of hops and mixed hops) should not be lower than that of hops from which they have been prepared.

2. Minimum Requirements for Hop Cones:

SL Characteristics

No.

Maximum Content (% ofweight)

Prepared Hops

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their final publication in the Official Gazette 2. Definitions . In these rules , unless the context otherwise requires:-

(a) " Act" means the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 (22 of 1963) ;

(b) " Agency " means any one of the Export Inspection Agency at Chennai , Delhi , Kolkata, inspect Kochi , and Mumbai established under sub- section ( 1 ) ofsection 7 of the Act ;

(c) " Council " means the Export Inspection Council established under section 3 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963;

(d) " Competent Authority" means any one ofthe ExportInspection Agencies (EIAs ) established under section 7 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act , 1963 located at Chennai , Delhi , Kochi , Kolkata and Mumbai ;

(e) " Hops" means the dried inflorescences or cones of the (female) climbing hop plants (Humulus Lupulus) which are greenish yellow incolour and ofan ovoid shape having a flower stalk varying from 2 to 5 cm. in length;

(f) " Hop powder with higher lupulin content" means the product obtained by milling the hops after mechanical removal of a part ofthe leaves, stalks, bracts and rachides ;

(g) "Extract of hops " means the concentrated products obtained by the action of a solvent on the hops or on the hop powder ;

(h) "Mixed hop products" means a mixture oftwo or more ofthe Hops , Hop powder with higher Lupulin Content and Extract of hops products referred to in clause ( e) to(g) .

3. Types of Inspection or Certification.- In orderto ensure the safety and quality of Hops and Hop Products exported from India and facilitate smooth trade of these products , any one of the two types of inspection or certification systems shall be followed, namely : --

Unprepared

Hops

(3)

(4) (2)

(1 )

1. Moisture

6 2. Leaves and stalks

4 3. Hops waste

2 4. In case of ' seedless hops' , 2 seeds

ANNEXURE

DRAFT RULES PROPOSED TO BE MADE UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE EXPORT (QUALITY CONTROL AND INSPECTION)

ACT, 1963

1. Short title and commencement.-

These rulesmay be called the Export ofHops andHop Products (Quality Control, Inspection andMonitoring) Rules , 2008 .

(1) Consignment wise inspection for ensuring alfa acid content, moisture , foreign matter (leaves, stocks, hop waste) and seeds (in case of seedless hop) ; and

(2) Systems approach to include end- product quality as well as implementation of Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP ) and Good Hygienic Practices (GHP) by the processor.

4. Basis of compliance .

4.1 Hops and Hop Products consignments intended for exports shall comply with the standards notified in the Appendix to the Schedule .

4.2 Certification under Systems Approach:

(a) It is the primary responsibility of the industry or processor to ensure that Hops and Hop Products intended for exportare processed and 657 [भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

2. laboratory test( s) for the additional parameters to be indicated inthe health certificate clearly indicat- ing about compliance of the consignment as per the requirement of importing country.

3.field inspection report (FIR) ( if applicable).

handled at all stages of production, storage , and transport under proper hygienic and manufacturing conditions and that the products conforms to the specifications given in the Order by the Central Government under section 6 of the Act;

4. A fee of Rs . 200/- per health certificate or other certificate shall be charged.

7. Certification fee.

Certification fee shall be paid by the applicant to the EIA at thefollowing rates namely :-

(a) Consignment- wise Certification: @ 0.4% of Freight on Board (FOB) value of consign- ment.

(b) The Competent Authority shall conduct regular monitoring of the establishments to ensure that good manufacturing practices (GMP) and good hygienic practices (GHP) are adopted by the establishment at all stages of production, storage and transport ofHops and HopProducts. For effective monitoring ofthe Scheme, Export Inspection Council will issue necessary instructions in this regard .

(b) Systems Certification:

@ 0.2% of Freight on Board (FOB ) value of consign- ment

8. Appeal-

(c) Having satisfied itself that the establishments meet the requirements with regard to nature of activities they carry out, the Competent Authority shall accord approval to establish- ments . The Council shali draw up a list of approved establishments , each of which shall have an official number.

5. Packing and marking.-

Any applicant aggrieved by the decision of the Export Inspection Agency, may, within 10 days of the receipt of the communication of such refusal prefer an appeal which willbe referredby the Agency to the Director (I &QC). The appealwiil be disposed of within fifteen days from the date ofits receipt. The decision of the Director ( I &QC) in such anappeal shall be final.

(a) An exporter intending to pack Hops and Hop Products for export after preparing the consignment as per the rules shall pack in hygienically clean food grade packing material.

कृषि मंत्रालय

(कृषि अनुसंधान एवं शिक्षा विभाग )

(b) Each package shall be legibly and indelibly marked with the following information , namely:-

नई दिल्ली, 8 फरवरी , 2008

Name and address of processor or manu- facturer.

(ii) Name and address of the exporter

(iii) Name of the material and grade desig- nation.

(iv) Batch or lot number .

का.आ. 343.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , कृषि अनुसंधान एवं शिक्षा विभाग , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियमावली, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप- नियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय कटाई- उपरान्त अभियांत्रिकी एवं प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थान ( भा.कृ. अ.प. ) लुधियाना, पंजाब को, जिसके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है ।

(v) Year, month and date of processing or manufacturing.

[फा. सं. 13-2/2002- हिंदी] (vi) Gross mass and net mass .

देवेन्द्र कुमार छतवाल, अवर सचिव (vii) Product of India.

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE (viii) Shipping mark.

(Department ofAgricultural Research and Education) New Delhi , the 8th February, 2008

6. Issuance of Health Certificate/ Attestation of Equivalence for European Union (EU).-

The Competent Authority will issue health certificates or attestation ofequivalence for European Union ( EU) within two working days , in a specified or any other format certifying additional condition , if any, based on importing country's requirement on the basis of the following reports , namely:-

S.O. 343. In pursuance ofsub - Rule (4) of Rule 10 ofthe Official Lanugage (Use for Official Purpose of the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, Ministry of Agricuiture , Department of Agricultural Research & Education hereby notifiesotifies Central Institute of Post Harvest Engineering & Technology (ICAR) Ludhiana, Punjab , where more than 80 % of staff have acquired the working knowledge ofHindi .

[No. 13-2/2002-Hindi ]

D.K. CHHATWAL, Under Secy.

1. laboratory test( s) conforming to the parameters described in the standard together with micro- biological tests ( ifapplicable).

658

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 4 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 344.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्टी में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथाथीता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स फिशर इलैक्ट्रानिक सिस्टम्स , 19/123/21 ,ए एमए कम्पलैक्स , पूठोले रोड, त्रिचूर -4 , केरल विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले "ए एक्स जे-12" श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित, तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एक्सेन्ट" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 07/353 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 किग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) का मान 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है.।

आकृति-2 माडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध ड्याग्राम

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा तथा मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम, निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित/ नहीं किया जाएगा । माडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का विशिष्टि स्कीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्राम. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 100 मि. ग्रा 2...या उससे अधिक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* यां 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 200 ) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 659 [भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOODAND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

NewDelhi, the 4th February, 2008

S.O. 344. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of, Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of nort- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of "AXJ - 12 " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "AXENT" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Fisher Electronic Systems , 19/123/21 , Α.Μ.A. Complex, Poothole Road, Thrissur -4 , Kerala and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/353;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verification scale interval (c) in 2 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Fig . 2 Schematatic diagram of sealing provision of the model

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram, working principle, etc. before or after sale. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg to 50mg and with number ofverification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10% ог 5x10k, where k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured ,

[F.No. WM-21 (200)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 470G1/08-3 660

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 4 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 345. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्तरिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स फिशर इलैक्ट्रानिक सिस्टम्स , 19/123/21 ,ए एमए कम्पलैक्स , पूठोले रोड , त्रिचूर -4 , केरल विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले "ए एक्स टी-11 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एक्सेन्ट" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/354 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमाता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यनकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) तोलम परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोस्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सीलिंग व्यवस्थाकी सिमेटिक व्यवस्था

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द किया जाएगा तथा मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम, निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । माडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का विशिष्ट स्कीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्राम से 2 ग्रा. तक के ' ई मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज और सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10* या 5 × 105, के हैं , जहां पर ' के ' धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (200) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

661 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

New Delhi , the

February, 2008

S.O. 345. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby insues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of " AXT- 11 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " AXENT" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Fisher Electronic Systems , 19/ 123/21 , A.M.A. Complex, Poothole Road, Thrissur -4 , Kerala and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/354;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Fig. 2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material, accuracy, design , circuit diagram , working principle, etc. , before or after sale . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision oof the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g or with verification scale interval (n) on the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5 g. or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (200)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 662

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

नई दिल्ली , 4 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 346.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

1 अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एटकाम एंटरप्राइजेज , 10 , जानकी नगर, नेडी नाका के पास , जलगाँव , महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एटीखे -30 के" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम "पटकाम" है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/508 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

माडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द किया जाएगा तथा मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । माडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का विशिष्ट स्कीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 की रेंज में और 100 मि.ग्रा. अथवा उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 * 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10* , के हैं, जहां पर ' के' धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (284 )/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 663 [भाग II खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 23, 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

New Delhi , the 4th February, 2008.

S.O. 346. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with digital indication of "ATJ - 30k " series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " ATCOM" (herein referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s . Atcom Enterprises, 10, Janki Nagar, Near Neri Naka , Jalgaon , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approvat mark IND/09/07/508 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg. and minimum, capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 2 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

The sealing is done by double sealing system . One seal is at one side with stamping plate. The second seal is at the other side of the scale by making two holes one in the bottom plate and other in the side plate , twisted sealing wire is passed through these holes in the side of the scale and both wires are fitted with lead seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg. and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50000 for ' e ' value of 1mg to 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg. or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F.No. WM-21 (284)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 664

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART IISEC. 3 (ii )]

नई दिल्ली , 4 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 347.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः, अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एटकाम इंटरप्राइजेज, 10 , जानकी नगर, नेडी नाका के पास , जलगाँव, महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एटीडब्ल्यू-30 टी " श्रृंखला अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेगब्रिज प्रकार) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एटकाम " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 07 /509 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेगब्रिज प्रकार) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई) 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधैयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वील्ट, और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

डबल सीलिंग प्रणाली द्वारा सीलिंग की जाती है । एक सील स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के साथ एक साइड में लगाई जाती है । दूसरी सील तुला की दूसरी साइड में बाटम प्लेट तथा साइड प्लेट में छिद्र करके की जाती है और तुला की साइड में इन छिद्रों के माध्यम से टिवस्टिड सीलिंग तार पास किया जाता है तथा दोनों तारों को लीड सील के साथ फिट किया जाता है मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान के टाइपिकल सिमेटिक डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गयाहै ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है किउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा.या उससे अधिक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1× 10 , 2× 10 अथवा 5 × 10 , के हैं, जहाँ पर ' के ' धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (248 ) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 665 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4,1929

NewDelhi, the 4th February,2008

S.O. 347. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (weighbridge type) with digital indication of " ATW-30t" series belonging to medium accuracy (Accuracy class-III) and with brand name " ATCOM" (herein referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/ s . Atcom Enterprises , 10, Janki Nagar , Near Neri Naka, Jalgaon , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/509;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (weighbridge type) with a maximum capacity of 30 tonne and minimum capacity of 100 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 5 kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument opérates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Model Mar

ATM 3 Cap. 1304 Cap 1300 ky e -5

Atco

The sealing is done by double sealing system. One seal is at one side with stamping plate . The second seal is at the other side of the indicatorby making two holes one in the bottom plate and other in the side plate, twisted sealing wire is passed through these holes in the side of the scale and both wires are fitted with lead seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 100 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model have been manufactured.

[F.No. WM-21 (284)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 666

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नईदिल्ली, 4 फरवरी , 2008

: का. आ. 348. - केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्तरिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सिआस इंटरप्राइजिज, नं. 321 एम जी रोड, अमुथसुरभी , पांडिचेरी -605 001 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस ई-टी बी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सांसी" है ( बिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 07/ 157 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आर्धेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री, यथार्थता , डिजाइन, सर्किट डायग्राम , निष्पाद्रन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10* या 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यं के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (72 ) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 667 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

NewDelhi, the 4th February,2008

S.O. 348. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and (8) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " SE - TB " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " SANSEE " (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Siara Enterprises , No. 321 , M.G. Road , Opp . Amuthsurabi , Pondicherry -605 001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/157;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design, circuit diagram , working principle etc. before or after sale.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g or with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 ×10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F.No. WM-21 (72)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 470 Gl /08-4 668

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 23, 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

नई दिल्ली, 4 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 349,-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलोंका अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सिआरा इंटरप्राइजिज , नं. 321 एम जी रोड, अमुथसुरभी, पांडिचेरी -605 001 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले "एस ई- पी टी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक सहित , अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सांसी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/07/ 158 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. हैं और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वील्ट, और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री, यथार्थता , डिजाइन, सर्किट डायग्राम , निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 या 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक 'या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (72 )/ 2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 669 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

NewDelhi, the4th February, 2008

S.O. 349. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of self indicating non- automatic (Platfrom type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " SE -PT " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " SANSEE " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Siara Enterprises , No. 321 , M.G. Road, Opp . Amuthsurabi , Pondicherry-605 001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/ 158 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1000kg and minimum capacity of 4kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 200g. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy , design , circuit diagram , working principle etc. before or after sale .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of same series with maximum capacity above to 50kg and upto 5000 kg and with number of verification scale: interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k , 2× 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 (72)/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 670

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

नई दिल्ली, 8 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 350.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सानको इलैक्ट्रानिक्स, सेक्टर -2 , कसौली रोड, परवानू-173 220 , हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एस ए एम एस -30" श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित , तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सानको है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/ 328 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शेत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जेक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 280 वोल्द , और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

e:2g

Max: 30 kg Min : 100 g Ac: I Model: SAMS- 30

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द किया जाएगा तथा मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन, सर्किट डायग्राम , निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का विशिष्ट स्कीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है किउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मिली ग्रा . से 50 मिली ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 100 मिली ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक और 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतय क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1×10 , 2 × 10* अथवा 5 × 10* , के हैं, जहां पर ' के' धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 163 )/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 671 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

NewDelhi , the 8th January, 2008

S.O. 350.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " SAMS - 30 " series of high accuracy (accuracy class- II ) and with brand name " SANCO " (herein referred to as the said Model) , manufactured by M/ s . Sanco Electronics, Sector-2, kasauli Road, Parwanoo- 173 220, H.P. and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /07/328 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 2g. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Max:30 kg

Min:100 g

e: 2g

Ac:1

Model: SAMS- 3

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and Model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram , working principle etc. before or after sale . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with Number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 1mg to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the rangeange of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 163)/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 672

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 351.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सानको इलैक्ट्रानिक्स , सेक्टर -2 , कसौली रोड, परवानू-173 220 , हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एस र पी एस 15 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित , तोलन उपकरण ( व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सानको" है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/330 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि. ग्रा. हैऔर न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । और बैटरी की बैकअप सुविधा भी है ।

MAX: 150 kg

Min2 kg e 100g

Ac . III Model: SAPS 15

SANCO ELECTRONICS

सीलिंग व्यवस्था की सिमेटिक़ व्यवस्था

i स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द किया जाएगा तथा मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का विशिष्ट स्कीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है किउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 100 कि. ग्रा. से 200 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले है और " ई " मान के लिए 1 × 10 , 2× 10 अथवा 5 × 10 , के हैं, जहां पर ' के ' ध नात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 163 ) /2007 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 673 [भाग II खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4,1929

NewDelhi , the 8th February, 2008

S.O. 351. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Models described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of Model of non - automatic weighing instrument with digital indication(Person Weighing Machine) of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III) belonging to 'SAPS - 15 ' series with brand name " SANCO " (herein referred to as the said Model) , manufactured by M/s . Sanco Electronics, Sector- 2, kasauli Road, Parwanoo- 173 220, H.P. and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/330;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 150kg and minimum capacity is 2kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 100g . The display is of Liquid Crystal Diode (LCD) type. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply and also has battery backup facility.

MAX: 150 kg

Min:2 kg

e:100g

AcHI Model SAPS 15

SANCO

Fig . 2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and Model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy , design , circuit diagram , working principle etc. before or after sale . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 100kg to 200kg with . verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1×10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 163)/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 674

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4 , 1929

नई दिल्ली , 8 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 352.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सानको इलैक्ट्रानिक्स, सेक्टर -2 , कसौली रोड , परवानू-173 220 , हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एसएटीटी-30 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित , तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सानकी" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/329 संमनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । उपकरण की पठनीयता 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

Model : SATT - 30

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । माडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का विशिष्ट सकीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तौलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 * या 5× 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 163 )/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 675 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजमंत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

New Delhi , the 8th February, 2008

S.O. 352. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the saidAct, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " SATT- 30 " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III) and with brand name " SANCO" (herein referred to as the said Model) , manufacturedby M/s .. Sanco Electronics , Sector 2, Kasauli Road, Parwanoo- 173 220 , H.P. and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/ 329;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) . with a maximum capacity of 30 kg. and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 5 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Model: SATT-30

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram, working principle, etc. before or after sale . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg with, verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . to 2g . or with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g . or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F.No. WM-21 ( 163 )/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 470G1 /08-5 676

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

नई दिल्ली, 8 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 353.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेंको इलैक्ट्रानिक्स, सेक्टर-2, कसौली रोड , परवानू-173 220 , हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एसएसीओ-150 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित , तोलन उपकरण ( सिक्का डालकर व्यक्ति को तोलने की मशीन ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सेंको " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2007/ 331 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज अप्ररूपण प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । इसमें बैटरी बैकअप की सुविधा भी है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री, यथार्थता , डिजाइन, सर्किट डायग्राम , कार्यकारी सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों के संबंध में परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी बिनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 100 कि.ग्रा. से 200 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 या 5× 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 163 ) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 677 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

New Delhi, the 8th February,2008

S.O. 353.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the models described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions; Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument with digital indication ( Coin Operated Person Weighing Machine) of medium accuracy (Accuracy class- III) belonging to " SACO- 150" series with brand name " SANCO" (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Sanco Electronics , Sector - 2, Kasauli Road, Parwanoo- 173 220 , H.P. and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/331;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 150 kg. and minimum capacity 2 kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 100 g . The display is of Light Emitting Diode (LED) type. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply and also has battery backup facility.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for frauduient practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram, working principle, etc. before or after sale. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the , Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 100 kg to 200 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k 5 × 10% , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F.No. WM-21 ( 163)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 678

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

नई दिल्ली , 8 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 354,-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स प्रेसिशन इलैक्ट्रोनिक इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स कं. , एच-45 , उद्योग नगर , पीरा गढ़ी , नई दिल्ली-41 द्वारा विनिर्मित " जेम-3 डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचिन सहित टैक्सी/आटो किराया मीटर के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " गोल्ड टैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/07 /266 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन, प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है । उक्त मॉडल अंकक सूचन सहित टैक्सी/आटो किराया ,मीटर है जो समय और दूरी नापने का उपकरण है । यह यात्रा के किसी भी क्षण यात्री द्वारा संदेय प्रभार को निरंतर जोड़ता रहता है और उपदर्शित करता रहता है । यात्रा के दौरान कतिपय विनिर्दिष्ट चाल से ऊपर और विनिर्दिष्ट चाल के नीचे चली गई दूरी के किराए को देय करने का फंक्शन है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) मीटर की रीडिंग उपदर्शित करता है । " के " घटक 1390 पल्स/कि.मी. है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम, निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 113) /2007 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 679 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii)]

भारत का राजपत्र फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

NewDelhi, the 8th February,2008

S.O. 354. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with , the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of a Taxi/Auto Fare Meter with digital indication of ' GEM- 3W' series with brand name "GOLD TECH " ( herein referred to as the said model), manufactured by M/s . Precision Electronic Instruments Co. , H-45, Udyog Nagar , Peera Garhi , New Delhi -41 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/266;

The said Model is a Taxi/Auto Fare Meter with digital indication incorporated with a distance and time measuring device . It totalizes continuously and indicates the fare at any moment of journey, the charges payable by the passenger . The fare to pay is a function of the distance travelled above a certain specified speed and the time elapsed below a specified speed during the journey. The reading of the meter is indicated by Light Emitting Diode (LED) . The ' k' factor of the instrument is 1390 pulse per kilometre .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy , design , circuit diagram , working principle , etc. before or after sale .

[F.No. WM-21 ( 113)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 680

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 8 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 355. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्सी मीता इंजीनियरिंग वर्क्स , 15 - ए, सनराइज काम्पलेक्स, सम्राट इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , मेन रोड , लिम्डा लेन , के डी किचन वेयर स्ट्रीट, एस सी वर्कशाप के पीछे , मॉडल रोड, राजकोट द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एसटीटी -03 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , स्वतः सूचक, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सनराइज " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्तमॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2007/366 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदम प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है। उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्पंचालित ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 10 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम, निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का विशिष्ट स्कीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और "ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10%, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 205 )/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 681 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

New Delhi , the 8th February, 2008

S.O. 355. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Tabletop type) with digital indication of ' STT -03 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " SUNRISE " (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Meeta Engineering Works , 15 -A, Sunrise Complex, Samrat Ind. Area, Main Road, Limda Len , K.D. Kitchen Ware's Street, B/h. S.T. Workshop , Gondal Road, Rajkot-360004 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/366;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100 g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 5 g . it has a tare device with 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design, circuit diagram , working principle, etc. before or after sale. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg to 2 g or with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F.No. WM -21 (205)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 682

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 356.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्तरिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स गीता इंजीनियरिंग वर्क्स , 15 - ए, सनराइज काम्पलेक्स , सम्राट इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , मेन रोड, लिम्डा लेम , के. डी. सिंचन- वेयर स्ट्रीट, एस. टी. वर्कशाप के पीछे , मॉडल रोड , राजकोट द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एससीएस-03 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , स्वतः सूचक, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( क्रेन प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सनराइज " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2007/367 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है । उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित ( अस्वचालित ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) का मान 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द किया जाएगा तथा मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का विशिष्ट स्कीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 10,000 कि.ग्रा. तक की क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10* या 5 × 10* , के हैं, जहां पर ' के ' धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (205 ) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 683 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

New Delhi, the 8th February, 2008

S.O. 356. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the self indicating, non- automatic (Crane type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of ' SCS- 03 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class- III ) and with brand name " SUNRISE " (herein referred to as the said Model) , manufactured by M/s . Meeta Engineering Works , 15 -A, Sunrise Complex , Samrat Ind . Area , Main Road, Limda Len , K.D. Kitchen - Ware's Street , B/h . S.T. Workshop , Gondal Road, Rajkot- 360004 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/367;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load celi based non- automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 4 kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 200 g. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing: result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping piate , sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material, accuracy, design, circuit diagram , working principle, etc. before or after sale , A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of same series with maximum capacity upto 10,000 kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F.No. WM-21 (205 )/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 470 G1 /08-6 684

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

नईदिल्ली, 8 फरवरी , 2008

j को. आ. 357. केन्द्रीय सरकार क़ा, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्तरिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमादन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 कीं उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एक्यूरेट स्केल्स , 57/1 , स्नेहलता कुंख, इन्दौर ३ , मध्य प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले, " जेसीसीटी -11 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " थॉमसन्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2007/412 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अंनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आश्रेयतुलन प्रभावः है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम 'उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का विशिष्ट स्कीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

पुनः केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्नी से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 कि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्ग्रम तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 या 5× 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 226 )/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 685

फरवरी 23, 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र

New Delhi , the 8th February, 2008

S.O. 357. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions de p Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non-automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of ' JCCT - 11 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " THOMSANS " (herein, referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Accurate Scales , 57/1 , Snehlata Kunj , Indore - 3 , Madhya Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 07 / 412 ; ייקון,האם

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effert. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instruments operates on 230 V, 50 Hz alternate current power supply:

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material, accuracy , design , circuit diagram , working principle, etc. A typical schematic diagram of sealing arrangement of the model has been given above .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg to 2g . and with veryfication scale interval ' n ' in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , where k ls a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F.No. WM-21 ( 226)/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 686

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 358.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्तरिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः, अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एक्यूरेट स्केल्स , 57/1 , स्नेहलता कुंज , इन्दौर-3 , मध्य प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) बाले " जेसीसीपी -7 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " थॉमसन्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/2007/413 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

| स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द किया जाएगा तथा मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का विशिष्ट स्कीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

पुनः केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 या 5× 10 , के हैं, धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 226 ) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 687 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुक 4, 1929

New Delhi , the 8th February, 2008

S.O. 358. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of ' JCCP - 7 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name "THOMSONS" (herein referred to as the said Model), manufactured by M/s . Accurate Scales , 57/1 , Snehlata Kunj , Indore- 3 , Madhya Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/413 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Tableform type) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 2g . The verification scale interval (e) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 V , 50 Hz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate ,, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy , design , çircuit diagram , working principle , etc. A typical schematic diagram of the sealing arrangement of the model is has been given above.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby deciares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and upto 5000kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for 'e' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F.No. WM - 21 (226)/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 688

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/ PHALGUNA 4 , 1929

[PART II SEC. 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 8 फरवरी , 2008

का, आ. 359.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्तरिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैससी एक्यूरेट स्केल्स, 57/1 , स्नेहलता कुंज, इन्दौर-3 , मध्य प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( घथार्थता वर्ग-III ) वाले " जेसीसीडब्ल्यू-4 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " थॉमसन्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/2007 / 414 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण -पत्र जारी करती है।। T

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( बेब्रिज प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 किं.ग्रा. है । 'सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द किया जाएगा तथा मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का विशिष्ट स्कीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

1 पुनः केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- मन्त्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माणः कियाःगया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. यो उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक तथा 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1× 10* , 2 × 10* अथवा 5 × 10 , के हैं, जहाँ परे ' क ' धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 226 )/2007 ] i

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 689

फरवरी 23, 2008/फाल्गुन 41/1929) ЭТТИКАО ЗНТ

२००१ भारत का राजपत्र

[भाग II खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi, the 8th February, 2008

জাকক miপাথর S.O. 359. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the saiin the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy ever periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditionessay

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non- automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge type) with digital indication of JCCW-A series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class -III ) and with brand name "THOMSONS " (herein, referred to as the said Model ), manufactured by M/s. Accurate Scales, 57/1 , Snoblata, Kunj , Indore - 3 , Madhya Pradesh and which is assigned the approval, mark IND/ 09/07/419 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge type) with a maximum capacity of 30 tonne and minimum capacity of 100kg . The verification scale interval( e) is.5Kg It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 V, 50 Hz alternate current power supply ay mai

** *** *** ********* ? ? ?? ????????************છ છFFFFઃ????? ???????????છે *** -**??? **************** In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms ofof its material , accuracy , design , circuit diagram , working principle , etc. A typical schematic diagram of the sealing arrangement of the model has been given above .

Further , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 100 tonne with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g of more and with.' e' value of 1 × 10 , 2x10 or 5 × 10k , where kis a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F.No. WM-21 (226)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology.

690

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] .

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

नई दिल्ली, 8 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 360.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट तथा माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) और वाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स शिंशको डेंशी कम्पनी लि. 3-9-11 , यूशिमा, कुंक्यो- कू, टोक्यो -110034 , जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित और भारत में बिकी या बिक्री के बाद बिना किसी परिवर्तन के मैसर्स ईसीई- टेशवको लिमिटेड, नं. 377/22 , छठा क्रोस , विल्सन गार्डन , बैंगलौर-560027 द्वारा विपणित विशेष यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग-1 ) ' ए एफ' श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचक सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण के मॉडल का, जिसकै ब्रांड का नाम " शिको डेंशी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/444 सममुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्टो मैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पेसेशन सिद्धांत पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 220 ग्राम और न्यूनतम क्षमता 0.1 ग्रा. है । इसका सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल 1 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लाईट इमिटिंग डायोड तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

AF Series

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता, डिजाइन, सर्किट डायग्राम , वर्किंग सिद्धांत आदि के रूप में कोई परिवर्तन न किया जासके । माडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का विशिष्ट सीमेटिक डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल को अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उत्प्सी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तौलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 से अधिक या समान की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1× 10 , 2 × 10 * या 5× 10* , के हैं, धमात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूणर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 252) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 691 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008 /फाल्गुन 4, 1929

New Delhi , the 8th February, 2008

S.O. 360. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument with digital indication of "AF" series of special accuracy (Accuracy class -I) and with brand name " SHINKO DENSHI " (herein referred to as the said Model) , manufactured by M/ s. Shinko Denshi Co. Ltd. , 3-9-11 , Yushima, Bunkyo -Ku , Tokyo - 110034, Japan and marketed in India without any alternation before or after sale by M/s . Essae-Teraoka Limited , No. 377/22 , 6th Cross , Wilson Garden, Banglore -560 027 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/444 ;

The said Model is an Electro Magnetic Forces Compensation Principle based non- automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 220g . and minimum capacity of 0.1kg . The verification scale interval (e) is Img. The scale interval of the instrument ( d) is 0.1mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 V , 50 Hz alternate current power supply.

AF Series

The sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy , design , circuit diagram , working principle, etc. before or after sale . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg . and with number of verification scale interval (n) equal to or more than 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k , 2x10k or 5 × 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F.No. WM-21 (252)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 692

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4 , 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली, 4 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 361.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( कों) में सशोधन किया गया/ किये गये हैं :-

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि क्रम संख्या

संशोधित भारतीय मानक( कों ) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4) L

2, जनवरी 2008

1जनवरी , 2008 आई एस 2148 :2004 ( तीसरा पुनरीक्षण )

इस भारतीय संशोधन की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुरशाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों,: कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना , पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं.: ईटी22/टी -45 ]

पी. के. मुखर्जी , वैज्ञा. ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी)

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

New Delhi , the 4th February, 2008

S. O. 361. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendment to the Indian Standard, particulars ofwhich are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued:

SCHEDULE

Sl .No.

No. and Year of the Amendment

No. and Year of the Indian Standards

Date from which the Amendment shall have effect

(4)

(2)

(3)

(1)

2, January2008

1January, 2008 1 IS 2148 : 2004 / IEC60079-1 (2001 ) Electrical apparatus for Explosive GasAtmospheres -flameproof Enclosures " d "

Copies of this Amendment are available with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices :, Kolkata , Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[No. ET 22/T -45 ]

P. K. MUKHERJEE, Sc .- ' F ' & Head (Electro-Technical)

नई दिल्ली, 4 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 362.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया हैं वह वे स्थापित हो गया है : - 693 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम संख्या

स्थापित भारतीय मानक(कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदिकोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष

(1)

"(2)

(3)

(4)

31अक्तूबर, 2007 आईएस/आईसी 60947-4-2: 1999 निम्न- वोल्टता के स्विच गियर और नियंत्रण गियर भाग 4 कानटैकटर और मोटर स्टार्टरस खंड 2 एसी अर्द्ध -चालक मोटर निंयत्रक और स्टार्टर

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुरशाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. : ईटी 07/टी-3 ]

पी. के. मुखर्जी , वैज्ञा. एफ एवं प्रमुख (विद्युत तकनीकी )

New Delhi , the 4th February, 2008

S. O. 362. In pursuance of clause (b) ofsub -rule (1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Sl . No. No. and Year ofthe Indian Standards

Dateof Established

No. and Year of the Indian Standards, if any, Superseded bythe New Indian Standard

(I)

(2)

(4)

(3)

10October , 2007 IS/IEC 60947-4-2: 1999 Low voltage switchgear and controlgear Part 4 contactors and motor - starters Section 2 ac semiconductor motor controllers and starter

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg , New Delhi - I 10002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi, Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati, Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[No. ET07/T-3 ]

P. K. MUKHERJEE, Sc . -F & Head (Electro-Technical)

नई दिल्ली, 13 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 363.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम ( 5 ) के उप - विनियम ( 6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तारीख से रद्द/ स्थगित कर दिया गया है :-

अनुसूची

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

रद्द/स्थगित करने कीतिथि

लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/प्रक्रम सम्बद्ध भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

लाइसेंस संख्या सीएम/एल-

(2)

(3)

(4)

(1 )

(5)

7599508

2007-06-28 पनेर सीमेंट कम्पनी,

पोर्टलैंड स्लेग सीमेंट आईएस 455: 1 989

नरे गाँव, पोस्ट ऊचाट, भिवंडी- वाडा रोड, वाडा, जिला- थाणे 421312

[सं. सीएमडी-13: 13 ]

' ए. के. तलवार , उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर ) 694

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23, 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

NewDelhi , the 13th February, 2008

S. O. 363. In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 6) of regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification ) Regulations , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each : -

Sl. No. Licence No. Name and Address of the licensee

(1) (2)

(3)

1 7599508

PanerCementCompany,

Village Nare, P.O. Uchat, Bhiwandi -Wada Road Wada, Dist. Thane 421312

SCHEDULE

Article/Process with relevant Date ofCancellation Indian Standard covered by the licence cancelled

(5)

(4)

20070628

455:1989

[No. CMD/13 : 13 ] A. K. TALWAR, Dy Director General (Marks)

नई दिल्ली , 13 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 364.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के धारा 4 ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( को ) के लिए निम्न लाइसेंस प्रदान किया गया/ किये गये है:

भारतीय मानक की संख्या और

अनुसूची

अनुज्ञप्तिधारक का पता

अनुज्ञप्ति संख्या और

क्रम संख्या वर्ष

लागू होने की तिथि

(3)

(1)

(2)

7784503

भामा 1417: 1999

2007/10/08

7786709

भामा 1417 : 1999

2007/10/16

7786810

भामा 1417: 1999

7783497

भामा 1417 : 1999

2007/10/03

7784095

भामा 1536: 2001

7784402

भामा 12269: 1987

7792704

भामा 1417: 1999

(4)

श्री कृष्णा ज्वैलरज ,

परख चकला एम जी रोड, जावेरी बाजार, पोरबंदर , गुजरात 360575

पटेलज्वैलरऊ ,

गीता चैम्बरज , लोहान महाजन वाडी के सामने, स्टेशम रोड़ , तलाला ( गिर ) जूनागढ़ , गुजरात 362150

आभूषण ज्वैलरज ,

2007/10/16

चांदी बाजार , जामनगर , गुजरात 361001

व्रज ज्वेलरज,

दर्शनी पारेखनी शेरी के पास ,

नानी बाजार , गोंडल , राजकोट , गुजरात

जिंदल सॉ लिमिटेड ,

2007/10/01

समघोघा, मांडवी , परागपुर रोड़ , तालुका मुंद्रा, जिला कच्छ, गुजरात 370415

अर्जुन सीमेंट इंडस्ट्रीज़ ,

2007/10/09

मार्फत अमूल मार्केटिंग , द्वितीय तल , संकल्प कोम्पलेक्स, एस टी रोड, जूनागड़, गुजरात 362001

भाषिकज्वैलरज़,

2007/10/31

सोनी बाजार ( सरफ बाजार ) , नवाकाना रोड़ , राजकोट, गुजरात 360001 695 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र फरवरी 23, 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

(3)

(1) (2)

(4)

(5) 8.

7792603

भामा 1536 : 1999

2007/10/31

श्रीगोकुल ज्वैलरज़ , हवेली रोड, सावरकुंडला , अमरेली , गुजरात 364515

भामा 1417 1999

7792502 2007/10/31

जमनादास मुल्जीभाई संस , बाज़ार, बाबरा , जिला अमरेली , गुजरात 365601

10.

7792397

भामा 1417 : 1999

2007/10/31

माधव ज्वैलरज्ज हवेली स्ट्रीट , तलाला ( गिर ) , जिला जुनागढ़ , गुजरात 360150 11. भामा 1417 : 1999

7792401

श्री हरिज्वैलरज्ज

2007/10/31

प्रभू भुवन , महालक्ष्मी मंदिर के समीप , वोरा बाजार, जिला भावनगर , गुजरात 364001

12.

भामा 1417 2000

सिन्टैक्स इंडस्ट्रीज लि.

7792805 2007/10/31

सर्वे सं. 1231 ए 1211/1 , 1223 , 1224 , राष्ट्रीय राजमार्ग 88 ए, भचाऊ , जिला: कच्छ, गुजरात 470140

[सं सी एम डी-1/ 13 : 11 ]

ए. के. तलवार, उपमहानिदेशक (मुहर )

New Delhi , the 13th February, 2008

S. O. 364. In pursuance ofSection 4(5) ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Certification (Regulations) , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that Licence to use Indian Standard Mark, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :-

SCHEDULE

Sl . No. No. and Year of the Indian Standards

No. and Operative

Date of Licence

Address of Licensee

(2)

(4)

(1)

(3)

1. IS1417:1999

7784503

2007/10/08

Shri Krishna Jawelars , Parakh Chakala M.G. Road, Zaveri Bazar, Porbandar, Gujarat 36057 2. IS1417:1999

7786709 2007/10/16 .

Patel Jewellers GitaChambers , Opposite Lohan Mahajan Wadi , Station Road, Talala (Gir) Junagadh ,Gujarat 362150

3. IS 1417:1999

7786810 2007/10/16

Abhushan Jewellers Chandi Bazar, Jamnagar, Gujarat361001 696

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] (2)

(1)

(3)

4. IS 1417: 1999

7783497 2007/10/03

Viraj Jewellers Near Dharshi Parekhni Sheri , Nani Bazar , Gondal Rajkot, Gujarat 5. IS1536: 2001

7784095 2007/10/01

Jindal Saw Limited, Samghogha, Mandvi Paragpur Road , Taluka: Mundra Distt: Kachchh , Gujarat370415 6. IS 12269:1987

7784402 2007/10/09

Arjun Cement Industres C/oAmul Marketing, 2nd Floor , Sankalp Complex, S.T. Road Junagadh , Gujarat 362001

7. IS:1417 : 1999

7792704

2007/10/31

M/sBhavik Jewellers Soni Bazar ( Saraf Bazar) , Navakana Road, Distt : Rajkot, Gujarat360001

7792603

B. IS 1417: 1999

2007/10/31

M/sShree Gokul Jewellers Haveli Road, Savarkundla Distt: Amreli , Gujarat 364515 IS1417:1999

7792502 2007/10/31

M/s Jamnadas Muljibhai Sons Bazar , Babra, Distt: Amreli, Gujarat 365601 10. IS 1417: 1999

7792397 2007/10/31

M/ s Madhav Jewellers Haweli Street, Talala (Gir), Distt : Junagadh , Gujarat360150

7792401

11. IS 1417:1999

2007/10/31

M/ s Shree Hari Jewellers Prabhu Bhuvan , Near Mahalaxmi Temple Vora Bazar, Distt: Bhavnagar , Gujarat 364001

IS49845:2000

12.

7792805 2007/10/31

M/s Sintex Industries Ltd. Survey No. 1231,1211 / 1,1223 , 1224, ΝΗ 88A, Bhachau , Distt . Kachchh, Gujarat370140

[No. CMD- 1 / 13 : 11 ]

A. K. TALWAR, Dy . Director General (Marks) [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

697

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008 /फाल्गुन 4,1929

नई दिल्ली, 13 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 365. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो (प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम ( 5 ) के उप- विनियम (6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तारीख से रद्द/स्थगित कर दिया गया हैं : -

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता क्रम संख्या

लाइसेंस संख्या सीएम/एल-

( 1) (2)

(3)

7661281

मै. नवकार बेवरेजीज , सर्वे सं. 10/2 , 10/3 , कुकमा, भुज , जिला कच्छ, गुजरात -370105 2. 7500459 मै. कृष्णा बेवरेजीज , बैजनाथ पार्क हाईवे चाररास्ता, हलवाद , जिला सुरेंद्रनगर , गुजरात 363330

7501764

मै. अजंता इंडिया लिमिटेड, अजंता इंडस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट, रेवापार्क के सामने , मोरबी राजकोट राममार्ग , मोरबी , जिला गुजरात 363641

7554684

मै. रत्नामणि मेटल्ज एवं ट्यूबस लिमिटेड , सर्वे सं. 607 एवं 610. गांव थेबा , कालावड़ के समीप , चोकड़ी- जामनगर रोड , जिला-जामनगर , गुजरात

5. 7284580 मै. ख्याली पोमीमरज , गोंडल रोड़ , डॉ विक्रमभाई साराभाई मार्ग , बैन लेबज के सामने , राजकोट, गुजरात 360004

6. 7332767

मै. मेघदूत फूड कलरज प्रा. लि. प्रथम तल , मेघदूत सिनेमा बिल्डिंगज , महुआ , जिला राजकोट, गुजरात 364290

7. 7389695

मै. सिंघल प्लाईवुड इंडस्ट्रीज , सर्वे सं. 357/1 - ब, नानी चिराई, तालुका- भचाऊ, जिला-कच्छ, गुजरात 370201

अनुसूची

लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/प्रक्रम सम्बद्ध भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

रद्द/स्थगित करने कीतिथि

(5)

(4)

30/10/2007 पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा( विशिष्टि) भामा 14543 : 2004

10/10/2007 पैकेजबन्द पेय जल ( पैकजबन्द प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा( विशिष्टि) भामा 14543 : 2004

10/10/2007 दांत का मंजन भामा 6356 : 2001

11/10/2007 जल , गैस और मलजल के लिए बिजली से बेल्डित इस्पात के पाइप ( 168.3 से 2032 मिमी बाहरी व्यास) आईएस 3589 : 2001

11/10/2007 सिंचाई उपस्कर-स्प्रिंकलर पाइप-विशिष्टि भामा 14151 ( भाग 1 ) : 1999 भाग 1 पोलीएथिलीन पाईप

11/10/2007 संश्लिट खाद्य रंग निर्माण व मिश्रण भामा 5346 : 1994

19/10/2007 सामान्य प्रयोजनों के लिए प्लाईवुड आईएस 303 : 1975

[सं. सीएमडी-13 : 13 ]

ए. के. तलवार , उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर) 698

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23, 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 13th February , 2008

S. O. 365. In pursuance of sub - regulation (6) of regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations, 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which are givenbelow have been cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each :-

SCHEDULE

Sl . Licence No.

No.

Name and Address of the licensee

Article/Process with relevant Indian Standards covered by the licence

Date ofCancellation/ theLicence cancelled/ suspension (1) (2)

(4)

(5)

(3)

1. 7661281

30/10/2007

Packaged Drinking Water (other than natural mineral water) IS 14543: 2004

M/ s. Savkar Beverages , Survey No. 10/2, 10/3 , Kukma, Bhuj , Distt, Kachchh Gujarat 370105

2. 7500459

10/10/2007

Packaged Drinking Water ( other than natural mineral water) IS 14543 : 2004

M/ s. Krishna Beverages , Vaijnagh Park Highway Charrasta, Halvad, Distt . Surendranagar , Gujarat363330

3. 7501764

10/10/2007

Toothpaste

IS 6356 : 2001

M/s.Ajanta India Ltd. , Ajanta Industrial Estate Opprewa Park, Morbi -Rajkot Highway, Morbi , Distt : Rajkot Gujarat 363641

4. 7554684

11/10/2007

Steel Pipes for Water and Sowages (168.3 to 2.540mm outside diameter) IS3589 : 2001

M/s. Ratnamani Metals & Tubes Ltd. , Survey No. 607 and 610, Village Theba, Nr. Kalawad, Chokdi -Jamnagar Road , Distt: Jamnagar, Gujarat

11/10/2007 5. 7284580

Irrigation Equipment--Sprinkler pipes- Part 1 : Polyethylene Pipes IS 145151 : Part 1 : 1999

M/s. Khyati Polymers , Gondal Road, Dr. Vikrambhai Sarabhai Marg, Opp. Ban Labs , Rajkot, Distt. Rajkot, Gujarat360004

11/10/2007 6. 7332767

Synthetic Food Colour- Preparation and mixtures IS 5346: 1994

M/s. Meghdoot Food Colours Pvt. Ltd. , First floor , Meghdoot CinemaBuildings 364290, Mahuva Distt: Rajkot, Gujarat 364290

19/10/2007 7. 7389695

Plywood for General Purposes IS303 : 1999

M/s. Singhal Plywood Industries SurveyNo. 357 / 1 - B, Nani Chirai , Tal . Bhachau, Distt. Kachchh , Gandhidham , Distt . Kachchh , Gujarat370201

[No. CMD/ 13 : 13 ]

A.K. TALWAR, Dy. Director General (Marks) 699 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

नई दिल्ली , 14 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 366.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम ( 5 ) के उप- विनियम (6) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिनके विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गये हैं को उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तिथि से रद्द कर दिया गया हैं :-

अनुसूची

लाइसेंस संख्या लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

रद्द करने कीतिथि क्रम संख्या

लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/प्रक्रम सम्बद्ध भारतीय मानक सहित

(1) (2)

(3)

(5)

(4)

1. 7765293

20-12-2007

155411988

1100 वो तक कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए पीवीसी रोधित ( हैवीड्‌यूटी ) विद्युत केबल

इलैक्ट्रोमॅक्स इण्डस्ट्रीज , प्लॉट सं. 19/20 , एस एन 126पी , श्रीकृष्ण को हा सो लि, आमली गाँव , सिलवासा

(भाग 1)

2.7765192

दादरा और नगर हवेली-396260 इलेक्ट्रोमेक्स इण्डस्ट्रीज ,

694:1990,

20-12-2007

1100 वो तक एवं सहित कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए पीवीसी रोधित केबल

प्लॉट सं. 19/20 , एस एन 126पी , श्रीकृष्ण को हा सो लि, आमली गाँव , सिलवासा, दादरा और नगर हवेली-396260

[सं. के. प्र. वि./ 13: 13 ]

ए, के. तलवार, उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर )

NewDelhi , the 14th February, 2008

S. O. 366. In pursuance of sub- regulation (6) of regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations , 1988, the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Licence No.

Date ofCancellation SL No.

Name and Address of the licensee

Article/Process with relevant Indian Standard covered by the licence cancelled

(1) (2)

(4)

(5)

(3)

1. 7765293

Electromax Industries

20/12/2007

IS 1554: Part 1: 1988.

Plot No. 19/20 S.N. 126P, Shreekrishna CHSSL, Silvasa, Amvi Village, DadraNagar Haveli-396260

PVC insulated (HD) Electric Cables , single/multicore, insulation type-A , copper/aluminium conductors , armoured/unarmoured, Sheathed type ST- 1, Max OD upto and including 75mm excluding cables for mining & lowtemperature conditions for working voltages upto and including 1100V

2. 7765192

IS694: 1990

20/12/2007 Elecxtromax Inustries Plot No. 19/20 S.N. 126P , Shreekrishna Co. Hs.S. Ltd, Silvasa, Amli Village, Dadra Nagar Haveli -396260

PVC insulated Cables , Unarmoured flexible cables and cords of insulation type A with aluminium/ copper conductors , Unsheathed/ Sheathed , single/ multicore , Max. OD upto and including 60 mm and except cables for outdoor & low temprature conditions use for electric power and lightning for voltages upto and including 1100Volts .

[No. CMD/ 13 : 13 ]

A. K. TALWAR, Dy. Director General (Marks)

470G1/08-8 700

[PART I-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4, 1929

नईदिल्ली, 14 फरवरी , 2008

का.आ. 367.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम , 4 के उपविनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिनके विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं को लाइसेंस प्रदान किए गए हैं::-

अनुसूची

वैधतातिथि

क्रम संख्या

लाइसेंस संख्या

उत्पाद

आईएस सं./भाग/खण्ड वर्ष

पार्टी का नाम एवं पता

(कारखाना)

(1) (2)

(3)

(4) 1. 7805885 18-12-2008 बलवीन इंजिनियरिंग प्रा. लि. , डी-3/28 टिविम इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , कारसवाडा , नॉर्थ गोआ , बारडेझ , गोआ 403507 2.

06-12-2008

7802374

दमन वायर्स एण्ड केबल्स 160-डी, ओशीवारा इंडस्ट्रीयल सेंटर, लिंक रोड , गोरेगाँव बस डिपो के सामने , गोरेगांव पश्चिम , मुंबई 400104

3. 7806786 31/12/2008 एम एम इंडस्ट्रीज , प्लॉट सं 21-बी मीरा इंडस्ट्रीयल इस्टेट , एस वी रोड, थाने 400104 4.

19-12-2008

7806382

गोल्ड मेडल इलेक्ट्रीकल्स प्रा. लि. 22/23 , शुभ बिल्डिंग, सागर मंथन इंडस्ट्रीयल इस्टेट , भोईडापाडा, सातीवली, वसई पूर्व , थाने 401208

(6)

(5)

2148:2004 बिजली के उपस्करों के लिए ज्वालासह आवरण

694:1990 1100 वो तक एवं सहित कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए पीवीसी रोधित केबल

1258:2005 बेयोनेट लैम्प होल्डर

3854:1997 घरेलू और समान प्रयोजनों के लिएस्विचें

[संख्या केन्द्रीय प्रमाणन विभाग/ 13 : 11 ] ए. के. तलवार , उपमहानिदेशक ( प्रमाणन )

New Delhi , the 14th February, 2008

$ .O . 367. In pursuance of sub - regulation (5) of regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations, 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the grant of licences particulars of which are given below inthe following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Sl . Licence No. Validity Date

No.

Product

IS No./Part/ Sec. Year

Name and Address ( factory) of

theParty

(3)

(1) (2)

(4) 1.

18-12-2008

7805885

BalvinEngineering Pvt . Ltd. D3/28, Tivim Industrial Estate, Karaswada , North Goa , Bardez, Goa-403507 2. 7802374

06-12-2008 Daman Wires & Cables 160-D, Oshiwara Indi . Centre , Link Road, Opp. Goregaon. BusDepot Goregaon West Mumbai 400104

31-12-2008

3. 7806786

M.M. Industries Plot No. 21 /B , Mira Indi . Estate, S.V. Road, MIRA, Thane -401104

4. 7806382

19-12-2008 Goldmedal Elecitricals Pvt . Ltd. 22/23, Shubh Bldg. , Sagar Manthan Indi. Estate, Bhoidapada, Sativali , Vasai- East , Thane 401208 (5)

(6)

2148: 2004 Flameproof enclosures for electrical apparatus

694: 1990 PVC Insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V.

1258: 2005 Beyonet lamp holders

3854: 1997 Switches for domestic and similar purposes

[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ] A. K. TALWAR, Dy. Director General (Marks) 701 [ भाग II खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

नई दिल्ली , 15 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 368. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड (ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं: -

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम संख्या

स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों , यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

31दिसम्बर, 2007 आई एस 3025 ( भाग 63 ) : 2007 जल और अपशिष्ट जल के नमूने लेने तथा परीक्षण (भौतिक एवं रसायन ) की पद्धतियाँ भाग 63 आक्सीजन चार घंटों में अवशोषित (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नईदिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों :अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैद्राबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[सं. सी एच डी 32/ आई एस 3025 ( भाग 63 ) ] ई. देवेन्द्र, वैज्ञानिक- एफ ( रसायन )

New Delhi, the 15th February, 2008

S.O. 368.-In pursuance of clause (b) of Rules ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

SL No.

Dateof Established No. & Year ofthe Indian Standards Established

No. and year of Indian Standards , if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(1)

(3)

(4)

IS 3025 (Part 63): 2007

31December, 2007

Methods of Sampling and Test ( Physical and Chemical) forwater and waste water Part 63 Oxygen Absorbed in 4 h (First Revision)

Copyofthis Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices :Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[No. CHD 32/IS- 3025 (Part 63 ) ]

E. DEVENDAR, Scientist - ' F ' (Chemical)

नई दिल्ली , 15 फरवरी , 2008

का.आ. 369.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक (कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गए हैं:-

अनुसूची

संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

क्रभ संख्या

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4) , 1.

15फरवरी, 2008

संशोधन संख्या 2 जुलाई 2007

आई एस 1117 : 1975 वन-मार्क पिपेट की विशिष्टि (प्रथम पुनरीक्षण) 702

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4 , 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] इन मानकों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110 002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : सी.एच.डी. 10/टी-1117 ] ई. देवेन्द्र, वैज्ञानिक- एफ ( रसायन )

NewDelhi , the 15th February, 2008

S.O. 369. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule ( 1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been:

SCHEDULE

No. & title of the Indian Standards

No. and year of the amendment

SL No.

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

(2)

(1)

(3)

(4)

15February,2008

Amendment No. 2 , July,2007

IS 1117: 1975 Specification for One-Mark Pipettes (FirstRevision)

Copy tothese standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad,Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.

[No. CHD 10/T - 1117 ] Date: 18-01-2008

E. DEVENDAR, Scientist ' F ' ( Chemicals)

कोयला मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली , 19 फरवरी , 2008

का.आ. 370.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात्उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 958 तारीख 27 फरवरी , 2006 जो भारत के राजपत्र भाग 2 , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) तारीख 11 मार्च , 2006 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका माप 1211.00 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) है , कोयले का सर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी;

और उक्त भूमि की बाबत उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन कोई सूचना नहीं दी गई;

अतः अब केंद्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उपरोक्त अधिसूचना की विधि मान्यता को, उस अवधि के रूप में 26 फरवरी , 2008 से आरंभ होने वाली एक वर्ष की और अवधि के लिए विस्तारित करता है जिसके भीतर केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त भूमि को या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किसी अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दे सकेगी ।

[सं. 43015/9/2005- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]

एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi, the 19th February, 2008

S.O. 370.-Whereas by the notification of Government of India in the Ministry of Coal , number S.O. 958 dated 27thFebruary, 2006, issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 4 ofthe Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in the Gazette of India Part- 11 , Section 3, sub-section ( ii) dated the 11th March, 2006 , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal inlands measuring 1211.00 hectares (approximately) in the locality specified in the Schedule appended thereto.

Andwhereas, in respect of the said lands , no notice under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the said Act, has been given; Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers , conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby extend the validity of the above notification for further period of one year commencing from the 26th February, 2008 as the period within which the Central Government may give notice of its intention to acquire the said lands or any rights in or over such lands.

[No. 43015/9/2005 -PRIW-1 ] M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy.

703 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

0.1386

नई दिल्ली , 21 फरवरी , 2008

खेड़ली (जारी.... )

0.0020

0.3132

0.0900

0.0072

0.0020

का.आ. 371. केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में बीना संस्थापन से राजस्थान राज्य में कोटा तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

0.3096

3. खेड़ी

0.1300

0.1800

0.0288

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

0.0540

0.1080

111

0.0720

0.1050

110

109

02168

0,0252

102

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50) , की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषण करती है ,

103

0.0800

0.0072

107

104

0.2100

0.0216

105

106

0.0432

156

0.0750

157

0.2736

158

0.2592

193

0.1800

177

0.0020 कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमिं में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिये उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्रीमति भगवंती जेठवानी , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , बीना-कोटा पाइपलाइन परियोजना , भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, बी-105 इन्द्रा विहार तलवण्डी, कोटा -324005 (राजस्थान) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

192/285

0.0120

178

0.0740 अनुसूची

191

0.1530

0.1120 जिला : बारां

190

राज्य : राजस्थान

तहसील : छबड़ा

189

0.1800

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टेयर में

क्र. सं. ग्राम का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

188

0.0360

0.0940

186

327

0.0216

4. शेखापुर

135

0.2286

1. खोखई

0.3960

318

0.0150

319

0.0216 185/94

0.3924

317

0.2100 94

0.1620

0.0600

320

0.3060

105

321

0.4300 2. खेड़ली

346

101

0.3636

0.3200

353

0.0936

0.2800 101/130

354

0.0030

0.0936

102

355

0.0500 97

0.1656

356

0.0600

0.0828

0.2550

357

0.1260

361

0.0720

0.2016

0.1296

363

0.1250 92

362

0.1600 90

0.0072

368

0.0500 70

0.1692

411

0.0504

0.0720 69

0.2256

412

0.3384

410

0.2124 75

0.0020

409

0.0300

0.1440 704

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 1

1 2

0.0400

281

408

0.0600

बीलखेड़ा (जारी ... )

शेखापुर (जारी... )

282

0.0140 406

0.1944

285.

0.3600 405

0,1900

-0.0972

284.

0.0330

414

0.1260

294

109

0.0216

5. कछावन

0.3700

295

0.0040

101

0.0288

324

0.0040

105

0.0432

0.2880

106

8. सागोड़ा

0.0648

0.9600

125

0.0360

0.3780

122

0.3434

0.3240

141

0.0720

0.0020

142

0.1424

0.4250

154

0.1332

0.0612

152/176

0.0180

74/2

0.0972

163

0.2360

212/74

0.3366

150

0.1280

0.0080

140

0.0432 62

0.0216

6. दीलोद

0.0576

108

0,1600

0.0288

107

0.1170

116

0.1540

101

0.0576

116/368

0.2360

100

117

0.3190

0.0396

0.3840

119

0.0324

0.6460

120

0.0108

0.4770

121

0.0324

0.3190

123

0.0576

213/77

0.2470

125

0.1320

0.2470

140

0.0144

109

0.4500

137

0.0720

180

0.6600

163

0.0594

0.0072

9. कड़ीखेड़ी

164

0.3096

0.0216

165

0.1224

18/155

0.1296

167/510

0.1728

18/154

0.0648

167/511

18/127

0.1296

0.2972

172/522

0.0040

0.2972

172/520

0.1872

0.2756

172

0.0540

0.3240 7. बीलखेड़ा

8/126

0.0020

[फा. सं. आर. 31015/10/2008- ओ आर- II ]

0.0100

0.3100

ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव

0.3200

101

0.3240

125

0.3240

117

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS New Delhi , the 21st February, 2008

0.2232

118

0.0020

121

0.1296

119

0.0324

120

0.7200

165

0.2340

271

0.2340

270

S.O. 371. Whereas it appears to the Central Gov- ernment that it is necessary in the public interest that for thetransportation ofpetroleum products from Bina termi- nal in the State of Madhya Pradesh, Pipeline to Kota in the State of Rajasthan should be laid by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;

0.2340

280

0.0900

267

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline it is necessary

Hel 705 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23, 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

1 2

0.1080

3. KHEDI

to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;

111

0.0720

110

0.1050

0.2168

109

0.0252

102

103

0.0800 Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) ofSection 3 ofthe Petroleum and Min- erals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

0.0072

107

104

0.2100

0.0216

105

106

0.0432

0.0750

156

157

0.2736

158

0.2592

193

0.1800

177

0.0020

192/285

0.0120 Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object inwrit- ing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying ofthe pipeline under the land to Smt . Bhagwanti Jethwani , CompetentAuthority, Bina-Kota Pipeline Project, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited , B- 105 , Indra Vihar Talwandi , Kota - 324005 ( Rajasthan) .

178

0.0740 SCHEDULE

191

0.1530

190

0.1120 Tehsil : Chhabra District:Baran State : Rajasthan

0.1800

189

188

0.0360 Sl . Name ofVillage No.

Area in Hectare

Survey No.

186

0.0940

327

4. SHEKHAPUR

0.0216 3

1. 2

318

0.3960

0.2286

135

1. KHOKHAI

319

0.0216 96

0.0150

317

0.2100

0.3924

185/94

0.0600

320

0.1620

.94

321

0.4300

0.3060

2 KHEDLI

105

346

0.3200

0.3636

101

353

0.2800

0.0936

101/130

354

0.0030 102

0.0936

355

0.0500 97

0.1656

356

0.0600 98

0.0828

0.2550

357

0.1260

361

0.0720

0.2016

363

0.1250

0.1296

0.1600

362

0.0072

368

0.0500 70

0.1692

411

0.0720

0.0504

412

0.3384

0.2256

410

0.2124 75

0.0020

409

0.0300 67

0.1440

0.0600

408

0.1386

406

0.1944

0.0020

405

0.1900

0.3132

414

0.0330

0.0900

5. KACHHAVAN

109

0.0216

0.0072

0.0040

101.

0.0020

105

0.0040 76

0.3096

106

0.2880

0.1300

0.9600

125

0.1800

122

0.3780

0.0288

141

0.3240 83

0.0540

142

0.0020 706

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

4 11 2

154

0.4250

0.1332 5. KACHHAVAN

8. SAGODA ( contd .)

152/176

0.0612

74/2

0.0180 -(contd.)

0.0972

163

212/74

0.2360

0.3366

0.1280 150

0.0080

140

0.0432

0.0216

0.0576

108

6. DILOD

0.1600

107

0.0288

0.1170

0.1540 116

101

116/368

0.0576

100

0.2360

0.3190

117

0.0396 119

0.3840

0.0324

0.6460

120

0.0108

0.4770

121

0.0324 123

0.3190

0.0576

213/77

0.2470

125

0.1320

0.2470

140

109

0.0144

0.4500

0.0720 137

180

0.6600

163

0.0594

9. KADIKHEDI

0.0072

164

0.3096

0.0216

165

18/155

0.1224

0.1296

167/510

0.1728

18/154

0.0648

18/127

167/511

0.1296

0.2972

0.0040 172/522

172/520

0.2972

0.1872

0.2756

172

0.3240

8/126

0.0540

7. BILKHEDA

0.0020

[F.N. R-31015/10/2008-OR - II ] 96

0.0100

0.3100

A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy .

101

0.3200

0.3240

125

नई दिल्ली, 21 फरवरी , 2008 117

0.3240

0.2232

118

0.0020

121

0.1296

119

120

0.0324

का.आ. 372. केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में बींना संस्थापन से राजस्थान राज्य मेंकोटा तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

165

0.7200

271

0.2340

270

0.2340

280

267

0.0900

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

0.0400

281

0.0140

282

285

0.3600

0.0972

284

294

0.1260

0.3700

295

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार के अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) , की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ,

0.0288

324

0.0432

8. SAGODA

0.0648

0.0360

0.3434

0.0720

0.1424

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियों साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिये उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्रीमति भगवंती जेठवानी , सक्षम 707 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

0.0100

599

माहर-(जारी )

प्राधिकारी , बीना-कोटा पाइपलाइन परियोजना , भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, बी-105 इन्द्रा विहार तलवण्डी, कोटा-324005 (राजस्थान) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

592

0.0390

714

0.0585 अनुसूची

0.2275

713

तहसील : सांगोद

जिला: गुना राज्य: मध्य प्रदेश

0.1625

712/1

711

0.1200

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टेयर में

क्र.सं.

सर्वे नंबर

ग्राम का नाम

0.0520

718

708

0.0080

703/2

0.2200 1.

माहर

0.0390

703/1

0.3200 66

0.2340

0.1300

702

0.0910

701/1

0.0455 65

0.0020

0.2450

701/2

0.1463

0.0350

700

0.0300

719

0.2795 60

0.0585

689

0.0228

0.1235

81/1

697/1

0.0065 81/2

0.0455

706

0.0130 80/1

0.0650

696

0.4500 80/4

0.0845

0.0040

696/ 1ख

80/3

0.0020

677

0.0390

0.0500

95/2

794

0.2665 96

0.0500

0.2925

816

95/1

0.1000

815

0.0130

0.1600

819

0.4500 92

0.0060

0.0325

683

0.0040

960

0.0720

0.0585

0.0080

821

0.0220

0.0040

831

0.1105

0.1000

850

106

0.1105

0.3200

848

0.0520

107

849

0.0130

0.0195

109

847/3

0.0260 110

0.1560

847/2

0.2000

0.0800

111

847/4

0.0650

0.0050-

116

0.0020

847/1 ग

112

0.2300

845

0.0520 114

0.0100

0.1918

970/2

113

0.2100

970/1

0.0813

0.0455

122

971/1

0.0748 416

0.3100

972

0.0130 417

0.0100

0.4550

973

414

0.1170

842

0.0195 413

0.2535

984

0.1170 407

0.1430

0.0715

983

408

0.0020

0.2925

981

0.1203

406

0.3120

979

0.1900

404/2

0.0020

995

405

0.0715

0.0910

978

0.0750

402/1

0.0130

0.1040

2. कींदर

0.2100

593

0.1200

596

0.2275

0.1950

597

1.1625

47/1

0.3380 470G1/08-9 708

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4, 1929

0.0040

कौंदर-(जारी)

5. मावन

0.3120

44/2

0.0585

0.0260

0.1755

0.4225

108

0.2275

107/2/4

0.0950

107/1/3

0.1820

107/2/2

0.1300

0.0080

107/2/3

106

0.0195

105/ 1 /2क

0.1235

105/1/1

0.3055

0.0195

105/ 1 /2ख

0.0358

104/1/25

104/1 /2घ

0.1723

104/2

0.0020

0.0065

104/1/2ग

104/1/2ख

0.1690

104/ 1 /2क

0.0715

182/1

0.0130

182/5

0.0650

0.6200

198/1/2

195

0.0700

0.2405

197

211/1

0.0390

210

0.1040

208

0.1500

207

0.0975

207

0.1300

0.1500

204

205

0.1300

215

0.0800

0.0600

3. सरखड़ी

85/3/3

0.0300

85/2/2

0.0065

85/3/2

0.2405

85/1

0.0100

4. टोरिया

253/2

0.0520

252

0.3450

250

0.0325

251

0.1528

0.3770

248

245

0.0020

247/1

0.1200

247/2

0.0800

0.0020

232/3क

0.0250

232/2

232

0.0250

232/1

0.2000

246

0.0195

[PART II--SEC . 3 (ii)]

4 3

869

0.0195 844

0.1853 845

0.0050

0.2015 843

842

0.1690 841

0.0975 830

0.4095 831

0.3350 824

0.0200 823

0.2730 678

0.1600 269

0.0422

0.1625 274

271

0.0195 263

0.2500

0.2000 277/2

276

0.0040 277/1

0.0040 279

0.1700 295

0.1105

0.2405 297

298

0.0455 299

0.0910 300

0.1550 301

0.0020 304

0.1560

0.2925 303

308

0.6100 320

0.0020

0.0325 147

321

0.3900 146

0.1170

0.3900 145

0.2340 140

139

0.0050 114

0.0228 141

0.0455 93

0.2925 97

0.0650

0.0845 96

0.0250 95

0.3100 100

0.0520 86

0.3835

0.0325 105

0.3100 106

0.0260 14

0.0020 15

0.1820 16

0.0910 18

0.1200

0.2000 17

0.0195 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23, 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929 12

मावन-(जारी)

0.0975

0.1723

0.0910

6. सिंगबासा

0.4700

202

200

0.1200

201

0.0130

129/2

0.1700

0.1365

129/1

130

0.1040

131

0.0130

132

0.0600

133

0.1300

0.0100

156

709

4 3

0.1430

0.0910 37

0.1885 38

0.2275 45

0.0020 39

0.1430 40

0.1625 41

0.1625

0.1170 43

0.8800 2/2

0.2145 3

0.3100 4

0.0200 13

0.0200

9. सकतपुर

134

0.1040

0.1300

135

106

0.0700

0.1700

136

0.0130

137

0.4250

138मि..

138मि.

0.0455

0.1235

143मि.

0.0850

143मि..

144

0.0800

0.7150

0.9100

872

1.7550

7. गुना छावनी

876

1.0010

875

0.0325

873

1.1505

874

0.0400

0.0195

8. पिपरोदा खुर्द

69/17/3/1

0.1170

14/1

0.0520 14/2

0.0020 25

0.1820 24

0.0195 23

0.1170 16

0.1430 20

0.0150 17

0.0585 18

0.0130 19

0.0260 84

0.0130 85

0.1755 92

0.0500 91

0.0680 11

0.0040 93

0.1560 94

0.3515 114

0.1235 11/216

0.0325 149

0.0260

10. चकसकतपुर

69/19ख

0.3000

69/17/2/4

0.1690

69/18/ 1क

0.0040

69/18/2ख

0.1200

0.2600

0.1625

88/382

0.0325

0.2275

0.0150

0.0230

139

0.1000

150

0.3300

146

0.1820

144

0.0020

145

0.2210

160

0.0195

164

0.3575

171

0.0195

0.0585

0.0800

0.3575 62/5

0.0300 63

0.1300 64

0.1430

0.1885 72

0.0650 53

0.0650

0.0650 46

0.0325 47

0.0650 41

0.0780

0.0520 37

0.0130

0.2340 8/1

9/1

0.1528 10

0.2340 11

0.1200 12

0.3600 13

0.0650 2/2

0.0200 710

[PART II-SEC. 3(fi) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

12 12

122

0.0200

11. गनेशपुरा

121

0.1235

120

0.1430

14. विनख्याई

118/1

0.4745

0.0300

118/2

0.1528

117/3

0.2925

117/2

0.0650

117/1

0.0260

4/2

0.1105

0.4420

12. महारामपुरा

0.0650

43/1

0.0100

521

13. पुरापोसर

0.3770

520

0.0150

526/2

0.2350

526/1

0.0150

527/1

518

0.1040

0.0020

517

0.0020

532

535

0.0100

0.3100

533

0.0100

536

0.1100

539/2

0,0520

537

0.0455

502

0.1560

506

0.0455

499

0.3100

500/1/1

0.1105

500/2

0.2405

500/5

0.0100

500/3

0,4500

500मि.

0.0813

500/6

0.2700

500/8

0.0390

0.1560

498

0.0390

465

15. विशोनिया

0.2665

178/1

0.0910

230

0.1105

231

0.0780

227

0.0520

226

0.0130

212

0.0845

235

0.0200

136

0.0325

114/1

0.0130

130

0.0800

129

0.0260

115/2

0.0040

128

0.0800

172

0.1300

116

0.0020

119

0.0130

113

0.9800

111

0.0080

111/1क20

0.2900

111/1ख9

4 3

0.2665 111/2

0.1365 111 / 1क 16

0.1500 121/1 ध

121/2

0.4100

0.0650 121/1 ड

122

0.0200

0.5600 115/3

0.0700 110

0.0520 111

0,0200 114

0.0910 112

0.0500 113-

0.0585 100

0.0350 99

0.0500 95

0.1105 92

0.0600 83/1

0.0900 83/3

0.0850 80

79/301

0.0100 79

0.0500

0.1650 73

0.0100 72

0.0520

0.1300 70

0.1100 69

0.0325 68

0.0130

0.0130 66

0.0390 65

0.0585 64

0.1560 62

0.3510 63

0.3100 13/26

17/1/10/2

0.2015

0.0325 17मि.

17/1/15

0.1885

0.1040 19/229/3

0.2300 19

0.2730 20

0.4700 21/2

0.0650 21/3/1

0.0300 21/3/2

0.0040 21/3/3

0.1105 33/1

0.0455 33/2

0.1000 36/1

0.2600 38/1

0.0020 39/4

0.0040 39/3

0.0065 39/2

0.0325 38/3/1

0.1400 38/3/3 711 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

4 63

वशोनिया-(जारी )

0.0400

0.0650

रिहाना-(जारी)

104

0.0650

0.2860

0.0293

105/1/1

0.2340

0.0520

105/5

0.0650

18. वींदाखेड़ी

0.0260

103

0.0650

103/2

0.1560

1.0075

0.1430

105/4

0.1885 105/1/2

0.0500

0.4615 105/6

0.1000

0.0020 65/1

0.0195

0.0260 1

0.0390

0.1690 156

0.0160

16. किशनगढ़

0.2275 132/1

0.2300

19. धनोरिया

0.0260

0.0050

132/2

0.0100 91/1

0.3055

37/2/1

0.0350

0.0455

0.1400

0.0325

45/1

0.0520 68

0.1300

45/2/2

0.3400

0.5200

45/2

0.0455 70

0.0020

47/5

0.1700 66

0.2275

0.3000 65/3

0.2500

47/4

0.1820 65/2/1

0.1100

47/3

0.0300 65/1

0.0500

0.3800

47/2

0.0325

0.0050

47/6

0.3800

0.0050

47/1/ 1ख

0.0845

0.0130 6

0.1500

34/2

0.2200 3/13/4

0.1300

25/32/1

0.0800 1

2.0736

0.2210 17. रिहाना

1.6500

90मि.

1.4300 18

0.0400

28/8

0.1300 90/1/2

0.3800

28/10

0.1300 91/2/4

0.1500

27/1

0.3200 91/2/3

0.1900

0.0845 19/4

0.0845

0.0520 91/2/2

0.0200

12/1

0.1040 64

0.3705

0.2470 63/2

0.1365

0.0020 63/2/1

0.3510

8/2

0.0715 63/1

0.2300

141

20. सावरामोदी

0.0200

0.1430

298

0.2145

144

0.5400 27

0.1700

148

0.0100 24/1/2

0.1000

0.5100

147/18

24/1/3

0.0910

0.0040

147/15

11/

0.0715

147/5

0.0650

0.2145

11/1/2

147/16

0.2600 10/1

0.1105

132

0.0400 10/2

0.1600

146

0.5000 9

0.0080

126/1 ख

0.1430

0.0040

129

0.3300

0.2210

128

0.6110

0.0020 712

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

0.0325

0.5500

264

66মি.

सुहाया-(जारी)

21. पोरूखेड़ी

262

0.0260

0.2080

0.0900

0.1560 69

263

0.2145

0.7800

258

141/26

0.2600

0.2800

258/9/2

141/1

0.1500

141/36

15/3

0.0390

23. बृजाबमोरी

0.1170

141/35

0.0845

0.0390

24. पथरिया

0.0130 75

0.0845

0.1430

141/12

0.0080

69/2

0.1040

0.2275

0.0715

69/1

0.0260

140

0.2700 130/5

0.0325

0.0260 132/5/5

0.2650

0.1820

0.1690

132/5/2

0.0780 130/5/3

0.1950

65/1

0.1280

0.1560

130/5/1

0.0040

65/2

0.0845

132/2ख

0.0800

132/2क

0.3000

0.2100

141

138

0.0040

0.1625

132/ 1ख

0.0450

140

0.1690

132/1 क

156

0.4100

0.2405

131/1क

0.0050

157

0.1040

131/2

0.0450

131/6/2

0.0325

0.1885

183

25. भूराखेड़ी

131/9

0.3310

0.3770

181

0.0260

0.1235

182/2/3

22. सुहाया

0.4500

0.0130

182/2/4

16/393

0.0130

0.1040

0.0845

0.0030 307/1/7

72/1

0.0650

307/1/6

182/2/3

0.0845

72/2

0.0030 308/1/8

0.1900

297

182

0.1560

0.0065

298/1

0.0650 296

0.3000

0.0650

295

0.1040

97/2

0.0390

0.0975

0.2145 294/1

97/1

0.3835

0.0845

108/2

294/2

291

0.0325

0.0576

111

292

0.1700

0.1365

104

0.0200

0.2535

114

0.2210

0.1365 274

120/1/3

273

0.1040

0.2405

130/1/3

0.0065

0.1235 272

121

270

0.0455

0.1000

122

0.0600

0.0100 271

120/1/1

269/1/5

0.2000

0.0200

118

269मि.

0.0130

0.0110

26. चुरेला

268

0.1300

80/1

0.1200 267

0.1430

0.3200

266

0.0520

0.0550

95/4

265

0.0130

0.0325

100

390

0.0520

0.0325

103 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

713 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

4 96

0.0200

79/4क

0.0520 चुरेला-(जारी)

रामनगर-(जारी)

0.0920

0.9425 117

0.0200

0.1040

79/1 घ

118/2

0.0600

77/2क

0.0650

0.0150

118/1

84/2

0.1100 116

0.1300

84/1

0.2100 120

0.0195

0.0715 124

0.2500

79/ 1 ग

0.0325 122/2

0.0325

0.0130 122/3

0.0455

0.0845 123/1

0.0585

0.0715 134

0.1170

82/1

135

0.0130

0.0195

0.1625

136.

0.2800

43/2

29. टकोदिया

0.1560

0.0780

43/3

0.2405

0.2800 21/2

0.0715

0.0130 62/3ख

0.1700

27. सेमराखेड़ा

45/1

0.0910 62/1

0.2200

0.0130 62

0.0260

69/1

0.3400 62/3क

0.0100

69/2

0.3800 60/5

0.0020

185

0.1885

30. किशनपुरा

60/3

0.1300

174

0.0200 61

0.1300

0.0200

177

0.3900

172

0.1800

176

0.0845

0.0390

77/1

180

0,0520 76/1

0.1300

0.5330

175/2

76/2

0.1300

76/1

0.0325

0.2000 31. भूमराखेड़ी

76/2

0.1755

0.0150 74

0.0260

0.0845

28. रामनगर

123/2

0.0845

0.1690

0.1430 123/1

0.0650 32. चकपारसीखेड़ा

0.0650

124/2

0.0100 124/1

0.0780

0.4600

125/1

0.0325

0.0200 129

0.0130

0.5200

0.1430

127/1

0.4100

0.0910

128

0.1900 131

0.0030

0.0350 132

0.2080

0.2500

133

0.2275

0.3700

135/1

0.0650

0.0050 120/1

0.0845

0.0130

0.0050

0.0845 101

102

0.4745

0.0520

0.3500

103/8

14/3/3

0.0325

14/3/1

0.1950

0.1200

103/1ग

14/2क

0.1755 103/ 1क

0.0200

14/2ख

0.1440

0.0163

44/1

0.2145

0.0250

79/2

0.1100

0.0040

0.0800

0.0165

79/4ख 714

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

2 1

176

0.3445

33. अजरोड़ा

35. पाखर

0.2470

179/201

180

0.1300

181

0.1755

191

0.0390

182/1/2

0.1300

182/2/2

0.1800

182/2/3

0.1820

0.1105

182/2/4

183/1

0.2275

0.1950

183/2/2

148

0.0650

184

0.0040

187

0.0020

185

0.3738

186

0.2925

186

0.0910

34. बनियानी

187

0.2600

188

0.1658

0.0390

190

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

4 3

0.4000 59/1

0.1680 57

0.0130

0.1900 58/2

0.6240 58/1

60/2

0.0500 55

0.0130

0.0130 54

53.

0.0130 34

0.2800

0.4355 33

27/4

0.4225

0.0943 31

0.0195 27/6

0,0040

0.3000 277

0.1625 27/8

0.0325 34/2

0.1500

36. आनापुरा

!

178

0.1820

179

0.0650

182

0.0100

180

0.1400

0.4200

175

0.0020

154/4

0.0293

173

170

0.1105

0.2080

171

0.1175 39

0.0360

0.1755 34/2/1

0.1625 35/2/4

35/2/5

0.4160 35/2/3

0.1625

0.1755 35/1/3

0.0195 36

0.0020 19/2

37. बींदाराड़ा

0.0400

161

0.0020

172

0.1000

130

128

0.1170

0.0300

131

129

0.1430

0.0163

132

0.1300

0.1755

38. सेमरा

0.0260

0.5915

0.0195

39. पाठी

0.5200

0.3400

0.0450

0.0250

0.0325

0.0910

0.1700

0.1950

0.3000

0.1900

0.0520

0.0195

0.0130

18/4

0.1300

0.1625 17

0.2925 18/1

0.3775 13

0.3250 12

0.0325

0.0275 11/2

0.0050 70

0.1820-

0.2600 71/2

0.0020 71/1

0.0195 23/1/1

23/2/2

0.2275 {

23/2/1

0.2275 22

0.1105 20

0.0130 19

0.3445 18

0.0050 23/3

0.3600 16/2

0.0400 24

0.0195 15

0.2535 13

0.2275 12

0.2275 9 715 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

पाठी-(जारी )

0.5395

0.2925

0.2990

0.4270

40. हमीरपुर

11/2

0.0390

0.0200

0.0920

0:1300

0.2200

Any person, interested in the land described inthe said Schedule may within twenty one days trom the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Smt. Bhagwanti Jethwani , Competent Authority, Bina-kota Pipeline Project, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, B - 105 Indra Vihar Talwandi, Kota- 324005 ( Rajasthan) .

0.2800

SCHEDULE

0.5000

District: Guna

Tehsil:Guna

0.0325

State: Madhya Pradesh

0.0010

0.0520

NameofVillage

0.0100

SL No.

Survey No.

Area in Hectare 21

0.2470

0.3445

0.0390

MAHAR

1.2700

0.8125

0.2340 66

0.0325

0.0910

1.1400

130

0.0020

0.0300

0.1463 93

0.2900

763

0.0300 91

0.2275

0.0585 90

0.2925

81/1

0.1235

0.0200

81/2

0.0455 89

0.5850

80/1

0.0650 99

0.0020

80/4

0.0845 84

0.0050

0.0020

80/3

0.1320

0.0500

95/2

0.0600

0.0500 87

0.0900

95/1

0.1000

0.5200

0.1600

0.0060 [फा. सं. 31015/11 /2008- ओ आर-11 ]

0.0040 ए, गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव

0.0585

0.0220

0.1105 New Delhi, the 21st February, 2008

106

0.1105

107

0.0520

109

0.0195

110

0.1560

111

0.0800

116

0.0050 S.O. 372. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Bina terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh, Pipeline to Kota in the State of Rajasthan should be laid by Bharat Petroleum CorporationLimited;

112

0.2300

114

0.0100

0.2100

113

122

0.0455

416

0.3100

417

0.0100 Andwhereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

0.1170

414

413

0.2535

407

0.1430 Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land)

470G1/08-10 716

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

1 2 2

408

0.0020

Mahar-(Contd,)

406

0.1203

404/2

0.1900

405

0.0715

402/1

0.0750

0.0130

2 KEENDAR

0.2100

593

0.2275

596

0.1625

597

0.0100

599

0.0390

592

714

0.0585

713

0.2275

712/1

0.1625

711

0.1200

0.0520

718

0.0080

708

0.2200

703/2

703/1

0.3200

702

0.1300

0.0455

701/1

0.2450

701/2

0.0350

700

719

0.2795

0.0228

689

0.0065

697/1

706

0.0130

0.4500

696

696/ 1ख

0.0040

677

0.0390

0.2665

794

0.2925

816

815

0.0130

0.4500

819

0.0325

683

0.0360

820

0.0360

960

0.0080

821

0.0040

831

0.1000

850

0.3200

848

849

0.0130

0.0260

847/3

0.2000

847/2

0.0650

847/4

0.0020

847/1ग

3. SARKHADI

845

0.0520

0.1918

970/2

0.0813

970/1

0.0748

971/1

0.0130

972

4 TORIYA

0.4550

973

842

0.0380

0.1170

984

[PART I-SEC . 3 (ii)]

4 3

0.0715 983

0.2925 981

979

0.3120

0.0020 995

0.0910 978

0.1040

0.1200 9

0.1950 48

47/1

0.3380

0.0040 50

0.3120

0.0585 44/2

0.0260 51

0.1755 61

0.4225 62

0.2275 108

0.0950 107/2/4

107/1/3

0.1820 107/2/2

0.1300

0.0080 107/2/3

0.0195 106

0.1235 105/1 /2क

0.3055 105/1/1

0.0195 105/ 1 /2ख

0.0358 104/1/25

0.1723 104/1 /2ध

0.0020 104/2

0.0065 104/1/2ग

0.1690 104/1/2ख

0.0715 104/ 1 /2क

182/1

0.0130

0.0650 182/5

0.6200 198/1/2

0.0700 195

197

0.2405

0.0390 211/1

0.1040 210

0.1500 208

0.0975 207

0.1300 202

0.1500 204

0.1300 205

0.1000 215

0:0600 86

0.0300 85/3/3

0.0065 85/2/2

0.2405 85/3/2

0.0100 85/1

0.0520 253/2

252

0.3450 250

0.0325 717 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 23, 2008/फाल्गुन 4,1929

0.3835 251

0.1528

TORIYA-(contd.)

0.0325

105

0.3770

248

0.3100

106

245

0.0020

9.0260 247/1

0.1200

0.0020

0.0800

247/2

0.1820 232/3क

0.0020

0.0910

0.0250

232/2

0.1200

0.0250

232

0.2000

232/1

0.0195 246

0.0195

0.0975 869

0.0195

5 MAVAN

0.1723

0.1853

844

0.0910 845

0.0050

6 SINGBASA

202

0.4700 843

0.2015

0.1200

200

842

0.1690

201

0.0130 841

0.0975

129/2

0.1700

0.4095

830

0.1365

129/1

831

0.3350

0.1040

130

0.0200

824

0.0130

131

823

0.2730

132

0.0600

0,1600

678

133

0.1300 269

0.0422

0.0100

156

274

0.1625

0,1040

134

271

0.0195

135

0.1300

0,2500

263

106

0.0700

0.2000

2712

136

0.1700 276

0.0040

137

0.0130

0.0040

277/1

0.4705

138मि.

0.1700

279

0.2085

0.1105

295

143मि

0.2405

144

297

0.0800 298

0.0455

0.7150 299

0.0910

0.9100 300

0.1550

1.7550

7 GUNA CHHAWANI 872

301

0.0020

876

1.0010 304

0.1560

875

0.0325

0.2925

303

873

1.1505 308

0.6100

874

0.0400 320

0.0020

8 PIPRODA KHURD

0.0195

0.0325

147

69/17/3/1

0.1170

0,3900

321

69/19ख

0,3000

0,1170

146

0.1690

69/17/2/4

145

0.3900

69/18/ 1क

0.0040

02340

140

69/18/2ख

0.1200 139

0.0050

0.2600 114

0.0228

88/382

0.1625 141

0.0325

0.0455

0.2275

0.2925

0.0150

0.0650

0.0230

0.0845

139

0.1000

0.0250

150

0.3300 95

03100

146

0.1820

0.0520

100 71B

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23, 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)j

8/1

144

0.0020

0.2340 PIPRODA KHURD

9/1

0.1528 145

0.2210

-(contd.)

160

0.2340

0.0195

0.3575

0.1200

11,

164

0.3600

0.0195

171

0.0650 30

0.0585

2/2

0.0200 28

0.0800

122

0.0200

0.1430

11 GANESHPURA

0.1235

121

0.0910

120

0.1430

0.1885

118/1

0.2275

0.4745 38

118/2

0.0300 45

0.0020

0.1528 39

117/3

0.1430

0.2925

0.1625

117/2

0.0650 41

117/1

0.1625

0.1170

0.0260 43

4/2

0.1105

0.8800

0.4420 2/2

0.2145

12 MAHARAJPURA

43/1

0.0650

0.3100

0.0200

0.0100 4

521

13 PURAPOSAR

520

0.3770 13

0.0200

9 SAKATPUR

0.0150

0.0520

14/1

526/2

526/1

0.2350

0.0020

14/2

0.0150

527/1

0.1820

0.1040

518

0.0195

0.0020

517

0.1170

0.0020

532

0.1430

0.0100

0.0150

535

0.3100

533

0.0585

0.0100

536

0.0130

0.1100

539/2

0.0260

537

0.0520

0.0130

0.0455

502

0.1755

506

0.1560

0.0500

0.0455

499

0.0680

0.3100

500/1/1

0.0040

500/2

0.1105

0.1560

0.2405

500/5

0.3515

0.1235

114

0.2000

500मि.

0.0325

11/216

0.0813

500/6

0.0260

149

0.2700 10 CHAKSAKATPUR

500/8

0.3575

0.0390 62/5

0.0300

498

0.1560

0.1300

0.0390

465

0,1430

0.2665

178/1

0.1885

230

0.0910 .

0.0650

0.1105

231

0.0650

227

0.0780

0.0650

0.0520

226

0.0325

212

0.0130

0.0650

0.0845

235

0.0780

0.0200

136

0.0520

0.0325

114/1

0.0130

130 719 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र फरवरी 23, 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

0.0800

21/3/3

0.0040 129

PURAPOSAR-(contd .)

115/2

0.0260

33/1

0.1105 128

0.0040

33/2

0.0455 127

0.0800

36/1

0.1000 116

0.1300

38/1

0.2600 119

0.0020

39/4

0.0020 113

0.0130

0.0040

39/3

0.9800

39/2

111

0.0065

38/3/1

0.0325

0.0080

111/1 क20

0.1400

38/3/3

111/1 क9

0.2900

0.0400 111/2

0.2665

104

0.0650 111/1क16

0.1365

0.0293

105/1/1

14 VINKHYAI

0.1500

121/1 ष

105/5

0.0520

0.4100

121/2

0.0260

103

121/1 ड

0.0650

0.1560

103/230

122

0.0200

105/3

0.0050

0.5600

115/3

65/2

0.0050 110

0.0700

105/4

0.1430 111

0.0520

0,0500

105/1/2

114

0.0200

105/6

0.1000 112

0.0910

0.0195

65/1

0.0500

113

0.0390 100

0.0585

156

0,0160

16 KISHANGARH :

0.0350

132/1

0.2300 95

0.0500

132/2

0.0050 92

0.1105

0.3055

91/1

83/1

0.0600

0.0455

0.0900

83/3

0.0325 80

0.0850

0.1300

79/301

0.0100

0.5200 79

0.0500

0.0020 73

0.1650

0.2275

0.0100

0.2500

65/3

0.0520

65/2/1

0.1100 70

0.1300

65/1

0.0500

0.1100

0.0325

0.3800

0.0130

0.0845 66

0.0130

0.1500 65

0.0390

3/13/4

0-.1300

0.0585

2.0736

0.1560

17 RIHANA

90मि..

1.6500

0.3510

0.0400 13/26

0.3100

90/1/2

0.3800 15 VISHOΝΙΑ

17/1/10/2

0.2015

91/2/4

0.1500 17मि..

0.0325

91/2/3

0.1900 17/1/15

0.1885

19/4

0.0845 19/229/3

0.1040

0.0200

91/2/2

0.2300

0.3705 20

0.2730

63/2/2

0.1365

0.4700

21/2

63/2/1

0.3510

0.0650

21/3/1

63/1

0.2300

0.0300

21/3/2

0.0200 720

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

4 1

0.2145

0.0020 RIHANE-(contd. )

0.1700

8/2

0.0715 27

24/1/2

0.1000

141

20 SAWRAMODI

0.1430

0.0910

24/1/3

298

0.0715

144

0.5400 11/1/3

0.0100

0.2145

148

11/1/2

147/18

10/1

0.5100

0.1105

147/15

0.0040

0.1600

10/2

0.0650

147/5

0.0080

0.2600

147/16

0.0040

02210

0.0400

132

146

0.0020

0.5000 13

0.0650

126/1 ख

0.1430

0.2860

129

0.3300 2

0.6110 1

0.2340

128

0.5500

0.0650

18 VINDAKHEDI

21 PORUKHEDI

66मि.

0.0260

0.0650

0.0900 49

1.0075

141/26

0.1885

0.2145

0.2600

141/1

0.4615

141/36

0.1500

0.0020

0.1170 20

141/35

0.0260

0.1690

0.0390

0.0845 17

0.2275

0.0080

0.0260

141/12

19 DHANORIYA

0.2275 41

0.0100

0.0260

0.0350

140

37/2/1

130/5

0.0325 38

0.1400

45/1

132/5/5

0.0520

0.2650

0.1690 45/2/2

132/5/2

0.3400

0.1950 45/2

0.0455

130/5/3

0.1560 47/5

0.1700

130/5/1

132/2ख

0.0845

0.3000

132/2क

0.1820

47/4

0.1625 47/3

132/1ख

0.0300

0.1690

0.3800

132/1 क

47/2

0.2405 47/6

0.0050

131/ 1क

0.1040

0.0050

131/2

47/1/ 1 ख

0.0325

0.0130

131/6/2

0.3310

131/9

0.2200

34/2

0.0260 25/32/1

0.0800

22 SUHAYA

0.4500 25

02210

0.0130 28

1.4300

16/393

0.0845 28/8

0.1300

307/1/7

0.0650 28/10

0.1300

307/1/6

0.0845

0.3200

308/1/8

27/1

0.1900

297

0.0845

0.0520

298/1

0.0065 4

0.1040

296

0.3000 12/1

0.1040 6

295

0.2470 721 [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 23; 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

4 3

1 2

97/1

0.2145 294/1

0.0975

SUHAYA-( contd.)

108/2

0.3835

0.0845

294/2

111

0.0325 291

0.0576

0.1700

104-

292

0.1365

114

0.2535 44

0.0200

120/1/3

0.1365 2

274

0.2210

0.1040

130/1/3

273

0.2405

121

0.1235 272

0.0065

122

0.1000 270

0.0455

120/1/1

0.0100 271

0.0600

0.0200

118

269/1/5

0.2000

0.01 10

26, CHURELA

269मि.

0.0130

80/1

0.1200 268

0.1300

0.3200 267

0.1430

95/4

0.0550 266

0.0520

100

0.0325 265

0.0130

103

0.0325 390

0.0520

0.0200 264

0.0325

0.0920 262

0.2080

117

0.0200 263

0.1560

118/2

0.0600 258

0.7800

118/1

0.0150 258/9/2

0.2800

116

0.1300 23 BRIJABAMORI

15/3

0.0390

120

0.0195 1

0.0845

124

0.2500 70

24 PATHARIY A

0.0130

122/2

0.0325 51

0.1430

123/3

0.0455 69/2

0.1040

123/1

0.0585 69/1

0.0715

134

0.1170 68

0.2700

135

0.0130 43

0.0260

136

0.1625

0.1820

0.1560 67

0.0780

0.2405 65/1

0.1280

21/2

0.0715 65/2

0.0040

0.1700

27 SEMRAKHEDA

62/3ख

0.0800

62/1.

0.2200 141

0.2100

0.0260 138

0.0040

62/3क

0.0100

0.0450

140

60/5

0.0020 156

0.4100

60/3

0.1300

0.0050

157

0.1300 95

0.0450

0.3900 25 BHOORAKHEDI

183

0.1885

77/1

0.0390

0.3770

181

76/1

0.1300

0.1235

182/2/3

76/2

0.1300

0.0130

0.2000

0.1040

182/2/4

0.1755

0.0030

72/1

0.0260

0.0845

182/2/3

28 RAMNAGAR

123/2

0.0845

0.0030

7212

123/1

0.0650

0.1560

182

124/2

0.0650 95

0.0650

124/1

0.0780 92

0.0650

125/1

0.0325 97/2

0.0390

129

0.0130

722

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4 , 1929

2 2

0.1430

RAMNAGAR-( contd.) 127/1

0.0910

128

0.0030

131

0.2080

132

0.2275

133

0.0650

135/1

0.0845

120/1

0.0050

101

0.0520

102

0.3500

103/8

0.1200

103/

0.0200

103/1

0.0163

02145

44/1

0.1100

79/2

0.0165

79/4ख

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

4 3

0.4100 38

0.1900 37

0.0350

0.2500 28

0.3700 29

0.0050 26

0.0130 19

0.0845 20

0.4745 14/3/3

0.0325 14/3/1

0.1950 14/2क

0.1755 14/2ख

0.1440 21

0.0250 22

0.0040 1

0.0800 176

0.3445

33 AJRODA

0.0520

79/4क

0.9425

0.1040

79/1 घ

0.0650

77/2क

0.1100

84/2

0.2100

84/1

0.0715

0.0325

79/1ग

0.0130

0.0845

0.0715

0.0050

82/1

0.0195

0.2800

43/2

29 TAKODIYA

0.0780

43/3

0.2800

34 BANIYANI

0.0130

45/1

0.0910

0.0130

0.3400

69/1

0.3800

69/2

0.1885

185

30 KISHANPURA

174

0.0200

177

0.1800

172

176

0.0845

0.0520

180

0.5330

175/2

76/1

0.0325

31 BHUMRAKHEDI

76/2

0.0150

0.0845

0.1690

0.1430

32 CHAKPARSIKHEDA 51

0.0100

0.4600

0.0200

0.5200

179/201

0.2470 180

0.1300 181

0.1755 191

0.0390

0.1300 182/1/2

182/2/2

0.1800

0.1820 182/2/3

182/2/4

0.1105

0.2275 183/1

183/2/2

0.1950 148

0.0650 184

0.0040

0.0020 187

185

0.3738 186

0.2925 186

0.0910 187

0.2600 188

0.1658 190

0.0390 178

0.1820

0.0650 179

0.0100 182

0.1400 180

175

0.4200

0.0020 174/4

173

0.0293 170

0.1105 171

0.2080

0.0400 161

172

0.0020 130

0.1000 128

0.1170 131

0.0300

0.1430 129

132

0.0163 90

0.1300 89

0.1755 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

723

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुम 4, 1929

38SEMRA

0.0260

BANIYANI ( contd. ) 50

0.5915

0.0195

39 PATHI

0.5200

0.3400

0.0450

0.0250

0.0325

0.0910

0.0020

0.1700

0.1950

0.3000

0.1900

0.0520

0.0195

0.0130

35 PAKHAR

0.4000

59/1

0.1680

0.0130

40 HAMIRPUR

58/2

0.1900

0.6240

58/1

60/2

0,0500

0.0130

0.2800

0.4355

0.4225

27/4

0.0943

0.0195

27/16

0.0040

0.3000'

27/7

0.1625

27/8

0.0325

35 AANAPURA

34/2

0.1500

0.1175

0.0360

0.1755

34/2/1

0.1625

35/2/4

0.4160

35/2/5

35/2/3

0.1625

0.1755

35/1/3

0.0195

19/2

0.0020

37 VINDARADA

0.1300

18/4

0.1625

0.2925

0.3775

18/1

0.3250

0.0325

0.0275

11/2

0.0050

470 G1/08-11

4 70

0.1820 71/2

0.2600 71/1

0.0020 23/1/1

0.0195 23/2/2

23/2/1

0.2275 22

0.2275 20

0.1105 19

0.0130 18

0.3445

0.0050 23/3

16/2

0.3600 24

0.0400 15

0.0195 13

0.2535

0.2275 12

0.2275 7

0.5395 35

0.2925 36

0.2990

0.4270 10

11/2

0.0390

0.0200 12

0.0920 23

0.1300 15

0.2200 16

0.2800 22

0.5000 26

0.0325 20

0.0010 30

0.0520

0.01 00 28

0.2470

0.3445 64

1.2700 65

0.8125 83

0.0325

1.1400 130

0.0300 92

0.2900 93

0.2275 91

0.2925 90

0.0200 97

0.5850 89

0.0050 99

0.0020 84

01350 85

0.0600 88

0.900 87

0.5200 [F.N. R- 31015 / 11 /2008 -OR - II] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.

724

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

नई दिल्ली, 18 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 373. केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 2594 दिनांक 5 सितम्बर, 2007 , जो भारत के राजपत्र दिनांक 9 सितम्बर 15 सितम्बर 2007 , में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा तालुक होसकोटे, एवं यलहंका, जिला : बेंगलोर ग्रामीण और बेंगलोर शहरी में उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में कर्नाटक राज्य में देवनगोंदी से बेंगलोर न्यू इंटरनेशनल एयरपोर्ट देवनाहल्ली तक एविएशन टर्बाइन ईन्धन के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ; गई थी; في और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को दिनांक 10 दिसम्बर 2007 , को उपलब्ध करा दी और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार क़ो रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात , इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

! और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य: कर्नाटक

जिला: बेंगलोर रूरल

तालूका: होसकोटे

क्षेत्रफल

सर्वे नंबर हिस्सा नंबर

गॉव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर आर

होब्ली: कसबा दोड्ड हुल्लूर्

राज्य: कनर्नाटक

जिला: बेंगलोर अर्बन

| तालूका: यलहंका

होब्ली: जाला उनसुर

[फा. सं. आर-25011/3/2007- ओ.आर. - 1 ] एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव 725 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23, 2008/फाल्गुन4, 1929

New Delhi , the 18th February, 2008

S. O. 373.- Whereas by the hotification of the Government of India , in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S.O. Number 2594 dated the 5th September , 2007 , issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , ( herein after referred to as the said Act) , published in the Gazette of India dated the 9th September 2007 to 15th September 2007 , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands in "aluk: Hosakote & Yalahanka , District : Bangalore Rural & Bangalore Urban in the State of Karnataka specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Sipeline for the transportation of Aviation Turbine Fuel in the State of Karnataka from Devanagondhi to Bangalore New International Airport , Devanahalli by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette Notification were made available to the public on the 10th day of December , 2007;

And whereas , the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 ofthe said Act submitted his report to the Central Government;

And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of the publication of this declaration in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

Taluk : Hosakote

District: Bangalore Rural

State : Karnataka Area

Name of the Village

Survey no.

Are

Sub-Division no.

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

6 1

Hobli : Kasaba

DODDAHULLURU

State: Karnataka Taluk :Yalahanka

District: Bangalore Urban

0 04 42

Hobli : Jala UNASURU

[ F. No. R-25011/3/2007 -O.R. - I ]

S.K. CHITKARA , Under Secy 726

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA4, 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 21 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 374.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाईन ( भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 571 तारीख क्रमशः 22.02.2007 जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख क्रमशः 24.02.2007 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए मुन्द्रा - दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी।

गई थी । और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 15.05.2007 को उपलब्ध करा दी और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात , और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ।

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना में संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।

| और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए , इस मंत्रालय के सहमति पन्न सं . आर-31015/7/03 ओ. आर- ।। दिनांक 25.11.2004 द्वारा लगाई गई शर्तों के अध्यधीन सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, हिन्दुस्तान पेटोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्यः राजस्थान

तहसीलः कोटपूतली

जिलाः जयपुर

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सं .

क्र.सं. गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

615

1 मंडा

603

1396

876

2 बसई

877

883

[फा. सं. आर-31015/64/2004-ओ.आर. - 11 ]

ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव 727

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 21st February , 2008

S. O. 374.-Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, S.O. Nos . 571 dated 22.02.2007 in the Schedule below issued under Sub-Section (1) of Section 3, Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , published in the Gazette of India dated 24.02.2007 respectively the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline through Mundra Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline for transportation of petroleum products from Mundra in the state of Gujarat to Delhi by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited.

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 15.05.2007;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1 ) of section 6 of the said Actsubmitted report to the Central Government;

And whereas the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1) of section 6 of the said. Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration , in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited , free from all encumbrances , subject to the conditions imposed vide this Ministry's consent letter No. R-31015/ 7 / 03 OR- II dated 25.11.04 .

Schedule

State: RAJASTHAN

Tehsil: KOTPUTLI

District JAIPUR

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Are Sq.Mtr

Hectare

Sr. No.

615

1 MANDA

603

1396

876

2 BASAI

877

883

[F. No. R -31015/64/2004-O.R. -II ] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy .

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] 728

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA4, 1929

नई दिल्ली, 21 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 375.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाईन ( भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का .आ . 623 तारीख क्रमशः 27.02.2007 जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख क्रमशः 03.03.2007 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गुजरात राज्य में मुन्द्रा से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए मुन्द्रा-दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन के माध्यम से हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी।

गई थी । और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 15.05.2007 को उपलब्ध करा दी और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात, और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है ।

अंतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना में संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए , इस मंत्रालय के सहमति पत्र सं . आर-31015/7/03 ओ. आर-।। दिनांक 25.11.2004 द्वारा लगाई गई शर्तों के अध्यधीन सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में विहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्यः राजस्थान

जिलाः सिरोही

तहसीलः आबूरोड़

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सं .

क्र.सं. गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

हेक्टेयर

एयर

1 दानवाव

237

234

239

252मिन01

272/252

[फा. सं. आर-31015/44/2004- ओ.आर.- II ]

ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव 729 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फ. रवरी 23, 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

New Delhi , the 21st February, 2008

S. O. 375. Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas , S.O. Nos . 623 dated 27.02.2007 in the Schedule below issued under Sub-Section (1) of Section 3, Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , published in the Gazette of India dated 03.03.2007 respectively the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline through Mundra - Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline for transportation of petroleum products from Mundra in the state of Gujarat to Delhi by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited.

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on the 15.05.2007;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub- section (1) of section 6 of the said Actsubmitted report to the Central Government;

And whereas the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances , subject to the conditions imposed vide this Ministry's consent letter No. R-31015/ 7/03 OR-II dated 25.11.04 .

Schedule

Tehsil : ABU ROAD

District SIROHI

State : RAJASTHAN

Area

Khasara No.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.Mtr Sr. No.

237

1 DANWAV

234

239

252Min01 272/252

[F: No. R-31015/44/2004-O.R. -II ]

A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.

730

[PART IISEC . 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: FEBRUARY 23, 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

नई दिल्ली, 21 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 376.- भारत सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि, मैसर्स रिलायन्स इन्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटिड , की आन्ध्र प्रदेश में संरचनाओं से देश के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए , मैसर्स रिलायन्स गैस ट्रान्सपोर्टेशन इन्फास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और भारत सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , भारत सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति जी उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के संबंध मे श्री डी . एस . धोत्रे , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मैसर्स रिलायंस गैस ट्रान्सपोर्टेशन इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड, 12 , सिविल लाईन्स, होटल 'सिप्स एन बाईट्स' के नीचे, विकास नगर, सोलापूर-413003, महाराष्ट्र राज्य को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

मंडल/ तहसील तालुका: बार्शी

राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

जिला: सोलापूर

गांव का नाम

सर्वे / हिस्सा नंबर

आर.ओ. यू . अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टर

एर

सि-एर 1

134**

20 1) नारीबाडी

69/3**

110**

16/2**

697**

9**

135**

371**

2)नारी

377/4**

388/2**

428/2**

425/2**

428/3**

393**

64/2/5*

394*

377/3*

396/इ*

43**

354/1**

20 3) गोरमाळे

273**

270**

287/1**

19 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

731

भारत का राजपत्र : फ. रवरी 23, 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

2 1

288/2 3) शोरमालले (निरंतर)

379**

271*

375/4**

377**

370**

369*

371/2"

107** 4) येळंब

31**

201/2

196/1*

203*

175°

96*

173*

108*

109*

110/3*

458** 5) वाणगांव

40**

38**

44/1 /2/

91/2*

91/3*

44/1/

44/3*

241** 6)धोत्रे

242**

272**

286/2*

294/2*

295**

301**

317**

274/2*

315*

316*

142/4" 7) अरणगांव

142/3*

142/2

130**

78**

131/5*

131/4*

131/3*

131/2*

75/2*

74/2*

70/1** 470G1/08-12 :

5 3

90 00

00 00

70 00

60 00

00 00

65 00

00 00

55.

50 00

00 00

90 00

00 :

20-

00 00

60 00

50 00

60 00

00 00

90 00

40 00

00 00

50 00

00 732

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

131** 8)जामगांव

130**

128**

119**

149*

121*

183/4*

179/6*

186/2*

186/3*

78** 9) गीयरे

77/1**

68**

55/1**

81/1/अ**

81/5**

51/1** 10) गाताचीवाडी

49/1**

49/2**

40/1**

20**

19/1**

162/3** 11) ताडसौंदणे

184/अ/2**

267/2*

164/1 / *

164/2*

166/1**

171/2/1**

180**

181**

182/1**

267/1*

76** 12) शेळगाव (हळे)

86**

92**

122**

145/1**

148/1**

149/1**

165/2**

188**

72/2/अ

141*

313** 13) देवगांव

317**

321**

327**

331**

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ]

5 00

10 00

80 00

20 00

30 00

00 00

20 00

00 00

30 00

70 00

80 00

50 00

90 00

80 00

10 00

20 00

30 00

15 00

20 00

50 00

30 00

20 00

00 00

60 00

90 00

60 00

00 00

70 00

20 00

70 00

20 00

70 00

40 00

60 00

80 00

00 00

00 00 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

733

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23, 2008/ फाल्गुन 4, 1929

282/2 13) देवगांब (निश्तर... )

142**

287/2*

289*

247**

281/1**

281/2** मंडल/ तहसील/ तालुकाः परांडा जिला : उस्मानाबाद

325** 1)सिरसाव

447*

148**

340**

495* 2) जवळा

257

96**

121*

120**

117

263**

118*

330** 3) घारगाव

296**

335*

295**

190** 4) राजुरी

184**

174**

173**

130**

98***

89**

37**

25/ब** 5) अंदोरी

124/2** 6) पांचपिंपळे

124/5**

128**

190/3**

183*

49/11*

69**

62/4**

49/5**

49/8*

5 3

00 00

70 00

00 00

30 00

30 राज्य : महाराष्ट्र

00 00

90 00

00 00

40 00

00 00

50 00

00 00

20 00

50 00

64 00

30 00

21 00

90 00

20 00

00 734

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)]

611**

7) कंवारी

451**

454**

486**

69**

8) सोनारी

20/2/अ**

9) कोडगांव

* नई अधिसूचना.

** का.आ. 2790 , दिनांक: 28/10/2004 और का .आ . 1964 दिनांक: 15/05/2006 और का.आ . 261 (अ) दिनांक: 20/02/2007 व्दारा पी.एम.पी. एक्ट, 1962 की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत सूचित किये गये सर्वे नंबर .

[फा. सं. एल-14014/43/2006-जी. पी. ] के. के. शर्मा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 21st February , 2008

S. O. 376.-Whereas it appears to the Government of India that it is necessary in public interest that for transportation ofnatural gas from Structures in Andra Pradesh of M/s. Reliance Industries Limited to various consumers in the country a pipe line should be laid by M/s Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited,

Andwhereas, it appears to Government of India that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which are described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquire the Right of User therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub-section (1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of Right of User therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri D.S. Dhotre, Competent Authority, M / s Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited, 12 , Civil Lines , Below Hotel ' Sips N Bites ' , Vikas Nagar , Solapur-413003 , Maharashtra State .

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

735

भारत का राजपत्र : फ रवरी 23, 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

Schedule

Mandal /Tehsil/Taluka: Barsi

State: Maharashtra

Ditsrict: Solapur

Survey/ Sub-division No.

Viliage

2 1

134 1)Nartwadi

69/3**

110**

16/2**

697**

g**

135**

371** 2)Nari

377/4**

388/2**

428/2**

425/2**

428/3**

393**

64/2/D*

394*

377/3*

396/E*

354/1** 3)Gormale

273**

270**

287/1**

288/2**

379**

271*

375/4*

377**

370**

369*

371/2*

107** 4)Yelamb

31**

201/2*

196/1*

203*

175*

96*

173*

108*

109*

110/3*

458** 5) Khamgaon

40** Area to be acquired for ROU

C-Are Hectare Are

20 00

60 00

20 00

00 00

80 00

00 00

20 00

10 00

90 00

00 00

70 00

60 00

00 00

90 00

Cont'd... 3 736

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA4, 1929

38** 5) Khamgaon (Cont'd)

44/1/2/B*

91/2*

91/3*

44/1/B*

44/3*

241** 6)Dhotre

242**

272**

286/2*

294/2*

295**

301**

317**

274/2*

315*

316*

142/4* 7)Arangaon

142/3*

142/2**

130**

78**

131/5*

131/4*

131/3*

131/2*

75/2*

74/2*

70/1**

131** 8) Jamgaon

130**

128**

119**

149*

121*

183/4*

179/6*

186/2*

186/3*

78** 9)Bhoire

77/1**

68**

55/1*

81/1 /A**

81/5**

51/1** 10)Gatachiwadi

49/1**

49/2**

40/1**

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

5 3

70 00

00 00

50 00

00 00

60 00

10 00

20 00

30 00

60 00

40 00

70 00

00 00

50 00

70 00

50 00

40 00

80 00

20 00

30 00

50 00

00 00

10 00

60 00

20 00

50 00

90 00

Cont'd...4 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फ रवरी 23, 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

20** 10) Gatachiwadi (Cont'd)

19/1**

162/3** 11) Tadsaundane

184/A/2**

267/2*

164/1/B*

164/2*

166/1**

171/2/1**

160**

181**

182/1**

267/1*

76** 12) Shelgaon (Vhale)

86**

92**

122**

145/1**

148/1**

149/1**

165/2**

188**

72/2/A*

141*

313** 13) Devgaon

317**

321**

327**

331**

282/2**

142**

287/2*

289*

247**

281/1**

281/2**

Ditsrict: Osmanabad

Mandal /Tehsil/Taluka: Paranda

325** 1)Sirsav

447*

148**

340**

495* 2) Jawala

257*

96**

121**

120**

117**

263**

118*

737 3

80 00

20 00

30 00

15 00

20 00

50 00

20 00

00 00

50 00

90 00

60 00

00 00

70 00

20 00

70 00

40 00

60 00

80 00

00 00

40 00

00 00

50 00

00 00

70 00

00 00

30 00

30 State: Maharashtra

00 00

90 00

30 00

00 738

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4 , 1929

330** 3)Ghargaon

296**

335*

295**

190** 4)Rajuri

184**

174**

173**

130**

98**

89**

37**

25/B** 5)Andori

124/2** 8) Panchpimple

124/5**

128**

190/3**

183*

49/11*

69**

62/4**

49/5**

49/6*

611** 7)Kandari

451**

454**

486**

69** 8) Sonari

20/2/A** 9)Koudgaon

* Fresh Notification

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] 3

5 00

90 00

50 00

90 00

60 00

20 00

84 00

30 00

00 00

21 00

20 00

00 00

10 00

45 00

40 00

** Survey Nos . Notified vide S.O. 2790 dated 28/10/2004 and S.O. 1964 dated 15/05/2006 and u/s 3( 1 ) S.O. 261 ( E ) dated 20/02/2007 of PMP, Act 1962. Additionai areas .

[ F. No. L-14014/43/2006-G.P. ] K. K. SHARMA , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 21 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 377.- भारत सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि , मैसर्स रिलायन्स इन्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटिड , की आम्ध्र प्रदेश में संरचनाओं से देश के विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए , मैसर्स रिलायन्स गैस ट्रान्सपोर्टेशन इन्फास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और 'भारत सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव हैं और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित हैं , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, भारत सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962(1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोपणा करती है ;

739

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4. 1929

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा (3) की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के संबंध में श्री एल . आर . गोतारणे, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , रिलायन्स गैस ट्रांन्सपोर्टेशन इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड , विशाल आर्केड, दूसरी मंजिल, चिचवंड स्टेशनरोड चिचवंडगांव, पुणे 411033, महाराष्ट्र राज्य को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला: पुणे मंडल/संहसिल/तालुक : शिरूर

गांव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर / गट नंबर 1

795/1 /3* 1) न्हावरा

814

811

807*

780/1*

780/2*

764

765

771

774

775

755/2A/ 1

706*

705*

708*

822

753/2

1258 1) शिक्रापूर

1261*

1190/4*

1658*

1303

1269

1563

1278

1313/2A

1332

1305

1330

1331

1333

1366

1380/1/1

1381 470 G1/08-13

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र आर ओ यु अर्जित करने के लिये क्षेत्रफल

एचर

हेक्टेयर

सी एपर

16 740

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4, 1929

1842/2

2) शिक्रापूर (निरंतर)

1599/2

1654

1050

1056

1057

1671/1*

1274/2

1571

* का. आ . 583 दिनांक 17/02/2005 व्दारा पी. एम. पी . ऐक्ट, 1962 की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत सूचित किये गये सर्वे नंबर इस प्रतिपादन भया निस्तीर्ण के लिए ।

{ फा. सं. एल-14014/48/2004-जी. पी.

के. के. शर्मा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 21st February , 2008

5.O. 377. Whereas it appears to the Government of India that it is necessary in public interest that for transportation of natural gas from Structures in Andra Pradesh of M /s . Reliance Industries Limited to various consunters in the country a pipe line should be laid by M/ s Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited,

And whereas , it appears to Government of India that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Lantu ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Government of India nereby declares its intention to acquire theRight of User therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under subsection ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of Right of User therein for laying the Pipeline under the land to Shri . L. R. Gotarne , Competent Authority, Rellance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited , Vishal Arcade , 2nd Floor Chinchwad Station Road , Chinchwadgaon , Pune 411 033 , Maharashtra State

Schedule

Mandal /Tehsil/Taluk: Shtru

Maharastra

Village

Wave Cal .

CAre

Area to be acquired for Ro Are

755/1/3

20 1) Nhavare

つい

841

807*

780/1

780/2"

764

70 741 [ भाग 1 ] - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

765

1) Nhavtare Conid...

771

774

775

755/2A/1*

706

705*

708*

822

753/2

1256*

2) Shikrapur

1261*

1190/4*

1658*

1303

1269

1563

1278

1313/2A*

1332

1305

1330

1331

1333

1366 *

1380/1/1

1381 *

1842/2

1599/2*

1054

1655

1656

1657

1671/1 *

1274/2

1571

00 *Survey Nos . notified vide S.O. 563 , Dated 17/02/2005 u/s 3( 1 ) of P &MP Act 1962. Present proposal is for additional externt .

[F. No. L-14014/48/2004-G.P . ]

K. K. SHARMA , Under Secy.

742

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDI .: FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

SCHEDULE

श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 24 जनवरी , 2008

"Whether the action of the management in dismissing Shri Baikuntha Das , Ex . U.G. Loader of 3 &4 Pit of Shankarpur Colliery, P.O. Ukhra, Dist. Burdwan(W.B. ) isjustified or not ? Ifnot, what relief the workman is entitled to?"

का/आ. 378. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार शंकरपुर कॉलरी आफैं ई. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , असनसोल के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 69/1995) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-1-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. - 22012/102/1995- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT New Delhi, the24th January, 2008

Afterhaving received the Order No. L-22012/ 102/95- IR(C.II) dated 21-11-1995 ofthe above mentioned reference from the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi , for adjudication of the dispute a reference case No. 69 of 1995 was registered on 5-12-1996 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notice through the registered post to the parties concerned directing them to appear in the Court on the date fixed and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims . In pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned. Sri P.K. Das , Advocate and Sri M. Mukherjee, Advocate appeared in the Court to represent the Management and the Union respectively. The wirtten statement was filed on behalfof both the parties concerned insupport oftheir claims .

S. O. 378. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947( 14 of 1947) , the Central Goverment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 69/1995) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Shankarpur Colliery of ECL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on24-1-2008 .

[No. L-22012/ 102/ 1995 - IR(C- II )] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

REFERENCE NO . 69 OF 1995

Present: Sri Md . Sarfaraz Khan , PresidingOfficer.

Parties: Agent, Shankarpur Colliery, P.O. Ukhra , Burdwan.

From the perusal of the record it transpires that the casewas fixed for hearing on 29-3-07 but none of the parties appeared. The union left taking any stem in its behalf since 29-3-2007 to 19-9-2007 . Repeated adjournments were given to take suitable step by the union but unfortunately neither the learned lawyer nor the union nor the workman concerned appeared in the court. The reference is very old one and the whereabout of the workman is not known as the union or the lawyer concerned has got no instruction from the side of the workman. These all prevailing facts and circumstance ofthe case go to show that the union or the workman has got no interest and does not want to proceed with the case further. In such cirumstance it is not proper and advisable to keep the old reference pending any more as no useful purpose is to be served. As such it is hereby

ORDERED

Vrs.

JointGeneral Secretary, CollieryMazdoor Union, Cinema Road, Ukhra, P.O. Ukhra Burdwan.

that let a "No Dispute Award" be and the same is passed. Send the copies of the order to the Govt . of India , Ministry ofLabour, New Delhi for information and needful . The reference is accordingly disposed of.

Representatives:

MD . SARFARAZ KHAN , Presiding Officer Forthe Applicant : Shri M. Mukherjee , Advocate .

नई दिल्ली, 25 जनवरी , 2008

For the Opposite Party: Shri P. K. Das , Advocate .

State: West Bengal

Industry: Coal

Dated the 31-12-2007

ORDER

का, आ. 379.-औद्योगिक विषाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी. सी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण ( सं. II ) , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 56/93 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-1-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 20012/115/92- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी Inexericse ofpowers conferred by clause (d) of Sub- section( 1 ) and Sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14of 1947 ), Govt . of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter No. L -22012/ 102/95 - IR(C.II) dated 21-11-1995 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal .

743 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

New Delhi , the 25th January, 2008

S. O. 379. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Goverment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 56/93 ) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal (No. II) , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/sBCCL and their workman, which was received bythe Central Government on 25-1-2008 .

[No. L -20012/115/92 - IR(C-I)]

SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUTRIAL

TRIBUNAL (NO.2 ) AT DHANBAD

Present:

! Shri Nagendra Kumar , Presiding Officer

Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10( 1 )

(d) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947.

Reference No. 56 of 1993

PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management of Mahuda Area No. 2 of M/s BCCL and their workmen.

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalfof the workman : Mr. D, Mukherjee, Advocate.

: Mr. D. K. Verma, Advocate .

Onbehalf of the management

State: Jharkhand

Coal.

Industry:

Dated, Dhanbad , the 14th January, 2008

AWARD

on the alleged ground of medical unfitness . No medical test was conducted nor any enquiry was conducted to determine the medical fitness of the concerned workman . After sometime the concerned workmen and the union represented before the management against the illegal and arbitrary termination of service and demanded reinstatement with full back wages . The management appreciating the legal position took positive decision to settle the issue amicably to avoid huge payment of back wages and reinstatement of comparatively old workmen. As per decision it was decided to provide employment to the dependant of the concerned workmen who were stopped from duty on the aileged ground of medical unfitness. The then General Manager had issued order for giving employment to the dependant of the concerned workmen. The dependant of the concerned workman were directed to appear before the Company's Medical Board in compliance of formality required for employment. As per direction of the General Manager the dependant had appeared before the Company's Medical Board and their physical ability and age were determined by the Company's Medical Board. Inspite of the aforesaid fact the management did not provide employment to the dependants of the concerned workmen due to which an Industrial Dispute was raisedbefore the ALC(C) who had submitted F.O.C. in a casual manner without applying his mind. Thereafter the Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour rejected the dispute for reference. The matter was challenged before the Hon'ble High Court and the Hon'ble Court directed the union to raise the dispute afresh before the authority. Accordingly, the dispute was again raised before the ALC(C) , Dhanbad. Inspite ofthe effort ofthe Concilication Officer due to anti- labour attitude ofthe management the matter was not settled and thereafter this reference was made by the Govt. of India. The action ofthe management in denying employment of the dependants of Paru Mia and 74 others who were dsclaredmedically unfit is illegal , arbitrary and against the principle of natural justice.

TheGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1 ) (d) of the I. D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their order No. L-20012/ 115 / 92- IR(Coal- I ) , dated, the 14th May, 1993 .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Mahuda Area No. II of M/ s B.C.C.L, P.O. Mahuda , Dist . Dhanbad in denying employment to the dependants ofS/Shri Paru Mian and 74 others (declared medically unfit illegally) as per annexure is justified? If not , to whatrelief are the concerned workmen entitled ? "

2. The case of the concerned workmen Paru Mia and 74 others in short as disclosed in the Written Statement filed on behalf of the workmen is that Paru Mia and 74 other concerned workmen were working at Mahuda area aspermanent workmen since long with unblemished record of service . During the time of emergency the management illegally and arbitrarily stopped the concerned workmen from service in violation of the principle of natural justice

3.As per the case of the mangement the mangement got surprised to hear the complaint that the concerned persons Paru Mia and 74 others were declared medically unfit during the period of emergency and were stopped from duties . Such complaint was made in the year 1998 with regard to the incident of 1976 for which particulars from the union relating to the concerned workmen was asked to verify the matter . The sponsoring union could not furnish the particulars of the concerned persons and their alleged medical test report declaring them medically unfit for their original job. The sponsoring union also could not furnish the nature of employment of the concerned persons and their particulars relating to identities such I.D. Card No. , Form No. C.M.P.F. No. or any other particular document. Since there was no materials , the management denied the existence of exployer - expioyee relationship between the management and the concerned workmen. In 744

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4, 1929

workman and the General Manager issued the order for employment of the dependants . It has also been denied that the mangement had issued Letters to the dependants of the concerned persons to appear before any medical board for determination of their physical ability , age etc. forjobs on the job of Miner/ Loader , While stating that the statement made in different paras a detailed number ofwhich have been mentioned are incorrect and the same has been denied . It has also been merationed that the concerned persons are not entitled to get any relief or any other relief asprayed for.

5.A further rejoinder in reply to the Written Statement ofthe mangement has been filed by the concerned workman stating the facts and some further details have been mentioned as to how the demand of the union is justified and action of the mangement is arbitrary, illegal and against the principle of naturaljustice .

6. Points to be decided:

"Whether the action of the management of Mohuda AreaNo. II of M/ s . B.C.C.L P.O. Mohuda, Dist . Dhanbad in denying employment to the dependants of S /Shri Paru Mian and 74 others (declard medically unfit illegally) as per annexure is justified? Ifnot , to what reliefare the concerned workmen entitled?"

7. Finding With Reasons :

Insupport ofthe case of the workmen WW - 1 Daulia Mia , WW- 2 Yunus Ansari have been examined by the sponsoring union. Besides this several documents have been brought on record and the same has been marked as Exts. W- 1 series , Ext . W -2 to Ext. W-4/ 1 , Ext . W-5 to Ext. W- 15 . On the other hand the management has produced one witness viz. Dineshwar Kumar Srivastava. However , it appears that no document has been exhibited on behalf of the management.

8. To decide the issue in question the first thing has to be examined whether the concerned persons as clained by the union were in service of the company or not and along with this question it has to be examined whether they were declared medically unfit illegally and further the concerned workmen are the dependants of the concerned persons .

the meantime the request for reference to and Industrial Tribunal for adjudication was rejected by the Ministry on 5-5-1989 . Thereafter the union had filed a Writ Petition before the Hon'ble High Court bearing CWJC No. 163091 ( R) and the Hon'ble Court have been pleased to reject the demand of the union vide order dated 11-9-90 as the sponsoring union awaited for an opportunity and after fabricating some documents concocting some facts made a fresh complaint before the ALC ( C) vide letter No. 10-1-92 . The sponsoring union had claimed that the General Manager ofMohuda Area had agreed to give employment to the dependants of the concerned workman who became medically unfit for their job for some reasons or other could not get his order implemented. Futher case of the managment is that there was no provision in NCWA - I which was in force between the period from 1-1-1975 to31-12-78 for the employment of the dependants ofworkınan who became medically unfit for his job . It was pointed out that the General Manger had thus no authority to provide employment of the dependants of workman as claimed by the union . The documents regarding offering of appointemntby the G.M. was found to be fabricated and this was pointed out before the ALC (C) in the course of conciliation proceeding . It has also been mentioned that in absence of any provision of law no workman can claim for emplyment of his dependant if he becomes medically unfit or retires from his service or he has superannuated on attaining the age of superannuation or dieswhile in service . It has further been mentioned that none of the concerned persons were on the permanent roli of the company and no one's name appear in the Form 13 Register, 1.D.Card Register or C.M.P.F. record . If any person had worked even for 60 days continuously at any period of time he should have been provided with I.D. Card and his name should have appeared in C.M.P.F. records. Ifany one was not eligible for becoming a member of CMPF he had no right to claim for appointment even he had workmen as casual or badli worker . The present dispute relating to the employment of dependants is not a subject- matter of industrial dispute . The concerned persons are not entitledto get their dependants employed even if they were genuine workmen and declared medically unfit legally or illegally and their services were terminated for any reason whatsoever .

9. WW- 1 has stated that he is the Zonal Secretary of Bihar Colliery Mazdoor Sabha. His union had raised the industrial dispute in the instant reference case . The concerned workmen were the members of his union. The concerned workmen got the appointment at different collieries under Mohuda Area. During the period of emergency the concerned workmen were stopped from their work . Then his union took up the matter with the management . In course of discussion the management agreed to provide employment to the dependant son of the workers who were found incapable to work physically. Those workmen examined medically were declared unfit by the Medical Officer.

4. In the rejoinder portion of the Written Statement of the management it has been denied that Shri Paru Mia and14 others were permanent workmen at Mohuda Area. Ithas also been denied that the concerned workmen were in employment of any of the colliery of Mohuda and they werel stopped from their duties on account of medical uniitness for any other reason at all . It has also been denied that the concerned persons were stopped from their duties on ground of medical unfitness or that they raised any dispute for their reinstatment with full back wages . It has also been denied that the mangement took any decision to provide employment to the dependants of the concerned

1 745 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4 , 1929

[ भाग 1 ] - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

show that the managernent discharged his father from service on medical ground . He is not able to say if the other claiment possess any paper to show that their respective father were discharged from the service by the management onthe medical ground . We have (torn) (there appears work ' not' ) submitted any paper to show that our father the einployees of the management . it is not a fact that father was not a workmen of Murulidih Colliery . It is not a fact that the father of other clairnants were not the employees ofthemanagement . It is not a fact that they have submitted a false claim for their employement.

10. During cross - examination the aforesaid witness WW- I has stated that it is fact that the concerned workmen were never employees of the management . From the reference it appears that the mattter has been referred relating to the denial of employent to the dependants of Paru Mia and 74 others . It appears that in the list the first name appears Paru Mia and further names of 74 persons have been given. Frorn his evidence in cross - examination it appears that the concerned workmen were not the employees of the management . If this evidence is taken into consideration this means the concerned persons were not the employees of the management . Then the question of dependant ofthe concerned workmen for ermployment doesnotarise .However , it appears that there may be mistake and it may be due to slip of tongue that the witness wanted to say that the dependants of the concerned workmen were never the employees of the management . However, this aspect of the matter will further be discussed while considering the other evidence and exhibits and materials available on record .

11. It will be relevant to mention that there appears "not" in first para of cross -examination of WW- i which has been cut and there is no signature . However , this witness in his further cross - examination on 29-1-2003 has stated that he has not submitted the medical report to show that some of the workmen were declared medically unfit in course of their medical examination. They have not submitted any 1. D. Card in respect of the workmen who were deciared medical unfit in course ofrnedical examination . Before medical examination of the workmen by the Medical Board no istter was Issued to those workmen by the management for causing their appearance . They have not submitted the C. M. P. F. number of those workmen before this Tribunal who were declared medically unfit . It is not a fact that the concerned workinen were never working under the management . It is not a fact that the claim of the concerned workmen are not justifled.

14. As far as oral evidence is concerned WW - 1 is the son of one Zonal Secretary of the Union, WW- 2 is the son of one alleged employee . However, from the oral evidence of both the witnesses there is nothing to show thatthey were in possession ofdocument like appointment letter, I. D. Card Wage slip /Pay slip , C. M. P. F. No. or any other document of the concerned workmen to show that all the listed 75 workmen were ever employees of the management . Not only this they have also not disclosed the specific detalls as to when the concerned workmen were appointed . It will further be relevant to mention that in the W. S. of the workman it has only been mentioned that during the time of emergency the management illegaliy and arbitrarlly stopped the concerned workman from service . No specific period of emergency has been mentioned and further no specific date of stopping the concerned workmen from service has been mentioned. Thereafter from the oral evidence as well as W. S. It appears that the concerned workmen were msdically examined and were declared medically unfit but no such document is on the record to show that the concerned workmen were ordered to be medically examined and were developed medically unfit. Not a single chit of paperhas been filed or brought on record to show that the concerned workmen were ever examined by the Medical Board/doctor of the company. A part from this even no document regarding stopping frorn service/discharge from service of the concerned workmen has been brought on record or even details have not been furnished in this regard so that a conclusion may be drawn that the concerned workmen were in the employment of the management .

12. From further evidence of cross - examination of WW- 1 it apears that as per his evidence the concerned workmenwere employees of the management were declared medically unfit in course of medical examination . However, at the same time the witness says that there is no docurnent regarding medical examination ofthe concerned employees . Itwill be relevant to mention that this witness WW- 1 has proved a number of documents to support the claim ofthe union which will be discussed after the evidence of WW-2.

13. WW- 2 has stated that Rustam Mian was his father and he was a workman at Murulidih Colliery. All the listed workmen as per reference were employees of BCCL . All the listed workmen as per reference were discharged from service as they were declared medically unfit. He has also stated that their demand is justified . During, cross- examination this witness has said that he has no paper to

15.Much argument has been advanced on behalf of the concerned workmen that there are documents to show that the concerned workmen wera employess of the management . In this regard Ext . W- 2 has been referred which is a letter from Personnel Manager to Mr. U. N. Lal , Dy. P. M. ( IR) which is dated 15/ 17-11-1990 in which there ismention of the fact that out of 70 names of the persons submitted by the Opposite Party before the ALC ( C ) , Dhanbad the names of 31 persons , (Names have not been disclosed) are available in the Form B Register of Murulidih 20/21 Pits . Referring this portion of the aforesaid letter it has been submitted that the name of the concerned workmen finds place in the Form B register which shows 746

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4, 1929

concerned workmen has been produced by the union to show that they were employees of the management.

19.Thus on the question that the concerned workmen were employees of the management there is no specific document, even there is no specific oral evidence to show that the concerned workmen were the employees of the management . There is only oral evidence ofZonal Secretary of the union and son of one concerned workmen to show that Paru Mian and 74 others were the employees of the colliery. It will be further relevant to mention that as per case of the concerned workman the concerned wokrmen were stopped from service on the ground that they were medically unfitbut even no such document is on the record to show that the concerned workmen were ever medically examined.

that they were the employes of the management . So far the rest persons are concerned the letter disclosed that it may be found in other units of the Area. It may be mentioned here that on the first page of Ext . W- 2 in para -2 it has been stated as per record the concerned persons had been working in Mohuda area in diffrent units . If the both portions areused in together it is not clear as to why there is such discrepancy Morever, this is a photocopy of the letter dt. 15-11-1990 It will be relevant to mention that concerned officers have not been examined. So far other papers filed by the union are concerned, particularly Ext. W-4, W-4/1 , W-5, W-6, W-7 and W- 15 , these papers relate regarding the minutes ofdiscussion with the management. But these papersdo not specifically show that the concerned persons were the employees of the management . It will be relevant tomention that during the course of argument it has been submitted by the Ld. Lawyer for the workman that on 20-6-2001 they had made a request for calling for the. document but the same were not submitted by the management . Hence , an adverse inferecne will go against the management . From the record I do not find any such petition filed by the workmen on 20-6-2001 . Even the ordersheet does not show filing ofsuch petition . However , further discussion will be made the later .

20. Insuport ofthe contention ofthe workmen it has been submitted that when it was found that the concerned workmen were medically unfit and were stopped from services the dependants of the concerned workmen were medically examined so that they may be given employment and for this purpose G.M. of the concerned area had assured for giving employment after medical examination ofthe dependants of the concerned workmen . The photo copy of the medical certificate of the dependants have been filed which is Ext . W- 1 series to show that they were foundmedical fit for the purpose of employment under the management of BCCL . Relying on this document it has been vehemently argued that there was no occasion of medical examination of these dependant persons of the concerned workmen unless there was occasion for giving employment and it has not been done by the management in spite of assurance /agreement . From perusal of Ext . W- 1 series it appears that these are photo copies of the document regarding medical examination of the so called dependant of the concerned workmen . Even if it is understood that these persons were examined by the MedicalOfficer this does not mean that on the basis of such medical examination they are entitled for being given employment unless law provides for the same.

16. The witness on behalf of the management i.e. MW- 1 has stated that he was posted as Dy. Chief Personal Manager in West Jaharia Area. It is not a fact that the concerned workmen were declared rnedically unfit by the Medical Board under the management . After consulting the record he says that those workmen had never worked under the management . During cross- examination he has said that he never worked at Mohuda Area. However, he has said as Dy. Chief Personnel Manager he dealt with the matter ofMohuda area. As per mines Act a workman who works in the mine his full particulars are recorded in the Form BRegister. He can produce the Form B Register of Mohuda area ifthe same is avilable . As per discussion he took effort to find medical papers of the guardians of the concerned workmen from Dr. S. Singh , Area Medical Officer. From his further evidence it appears that he tried to ascertain that the concerned workman were examined by theMedical Officer. He also enquired that on the basis of the medical report Manager/Agent stopped the workmen or not . He did not find medical report in respect of Paru Mian and 74 others . He has also stated that it is not a fact that the demand of the concerned workmen is justified.

21. Ld . Lawyer for the management has vehemently argued that as per NCWA during the relevant period there was no provision of employment of any dependant of the concerned workmen who have been discharged/stopped from service on the ground of medical unfitness . So the question does not arise to give employment to the dependant of the concerned persons who are claiming to be the ex - employees of the management though it is not a fact that they were ever employees of the company.

22. It may be relevant to meation here that WW- 2 has stated that they have not submitted any paper to show that they are the sons of the workmen who have been discharged from the services.

17. From the evidence of MW - 1 it appears that there is no record to show that the concerned workmen were the employees of the management . From his further evidence in cross -examination it appears that effect was made to obtaindetails from Dr. S. Singh . However, no medical report relating to the concerned workmen (regarding declaration of medical unfitness of the concerned workmen) was available.

23. On the basis of the evidence , exhibits and materiais available on the record the following facts have been noticed: -

18. It may be relevant to mention that none of the [ 'भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

747

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

(i) There is no document on record to show that the concerned workmen were employees ofthe management . Ext. W- 2 does not show that the concerned persons Paru Mian & 74 others were employee ofthe management .

(ii) Even specific detailed evidence i.e. date of appointment etc. , joining time etc. and discharge date etc. regarding employment ofthe concemed workmen have not been brought on record to show that the concerned workmen were the employees of the management.

(iii) There is no document/record to show that the concerned workmen were examined by the doctor and they were decalred medically unfit.

(iv) There is no document/evidence to show that the concerned workmen were discharged/ stopped from service.

24. Even for the sake of argument it is persumed that the concerned workmen were the employees of the management and were discharged from service on the ground ofmedical unfitness , there appears no provision of providing employment of the dependant of the concerned workmen in such circumstances .

25. A number ofdecisions have been filed by the Ld. Lawyer for the workmen are reported in A.I.R. 1940 Patma 683, 1985 Supreme Court cases (L & S) 975, 1980 Lab I.C. 669, 2005 ( 105) FLR 1065, AIR 1982 Allahabad 385 , 1983 1 SupremeCourt cases 436, 2007 (115) FLR427, 1989 Lab I.C. 1043, 2002(2) LLN 405, 1999(82) FLR 169, 1999 (82) FLR137, 1993 (66) FLR Patna High Court, Ranchi Bench, 2007 AIR SCW 6904 to support that the concerned workmen are entitled for the relief as prayed for . While going through the decisions referred to above I find that the facts and circumstances ofthe case are different and in the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case the same are not applicable. Hence the same are not being discussed in details.

26. In the result, I find no merit in the claim of the concerned workmen . Accordingly following Award is rendered:-

"The action ofthe management of Mahuda Area No. II ofM/ s . R.C.C.L. , P.O. Mohuda, Dist . Dhanbad in denying employment to the dependants of S/Shri Paru Mian and 74 others (declared medically unfit illegally ) as per annexure is justified. Consequently, the concerned workmen are not entitled to get any relief, "

NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer Name ofthe Workmen Name of the Dependants

Sri Jalil Mian

1. Sri Paru Mian

2. Sri Dewa Singh

Sri Dalip Kumar Singh

Sri Dil Mohammed Ansari 3. Sri Babujan Mian

Sri Ramchander Dushadh 4. Sri Narayan Duslhedbirh

470GI/08-14

Name ofthe Workmen Name of the department 5. Sri Nazir Singh

Sri Parasuram Singh

Sri Ram Chander Dhoba 6. Sri Chhotu Dhoba

7. Sri Md. Idris Mian Sri jaynuddin Ansari

Sri Akbar Husain Ansari 8. Sri Kishmat Sah

Sri Mito Mahato 9. Sri Bhagirath Mahato

SriBinod mahato 10. Sri Goda Mahato

11. Sri Jadu Mahato

Sri Kalicharan Mahato 12. Sri Hanif Mian

Sri Akhtar Ansari

Sri Sukhdeo Harijan 13. Sri Munilal Harijan

14. Sri Antu Mahato

SriRupNarayan 15. Sri Biswaram Sonar SriUdayNarayan

Sri M.K. Gosain 16. Sri Ram Tahal Gosain

17. Sri Beru Rawani

Sri Nangru Rawani

Sri Lalmani Mian 18. Sri Imdali Mian

Sri Sadakat Ansari 19. Sri Karamat Ansari

20. Sri Thakur Mahato Sri Rati mahato

Sri Mathur Turi

21. Sri Mangru Turi

22. Sri Sheo Nangal Lohar Sri Sheo Prasad Lohar

Sri Nagina Singh 23. Sri Baba Singh

Sri Rabindra Nath 24. Sri A.K. Mukherjee

Chatterjee

Sri Bindaban Mali 25. Sri Dashrath Mali

Sri Mukhtar Ansari 26. Sri Haji Rahman Sah

Sri Kasbi Nath Mahato 27. Sri Bhukhal Mahato

Sri Fastud Ansari 28. Sri Basir Mian

Sri Aditya Kumar Khawas 29. Gouri Banerjee

30. Sri Niajan Maan

Sri Masrur Hussain Ansari

SriRatilalGope 31. Sri Mahananda Gope

32. Sri Mathur Turi

Sri Shibu Turi

Sri Kamla Pd. Sorak 33. Sri Bidya Dhar Sorrak

Sri Dhiren Mahato 34. Sri Nanku Mahato

Sri Rahmat Ansari 35. Sri Asraf Sah

36. Sri Bacha Singh

Sri Bikram Singh

SriG.K. Chakraborty 37. Sri D , N, Sahaya

38. Sri Nizam Mian

Sri GulamMohammed 39. Sri Hari Gope

SriKishoreGope

Sri Pahu Bhuia

40. Sri Budhu Bhuia

Sri Mahendra Pd . Mahato 41. Sri Arjun Mahato

42. Sri Chandu Rajwar Sri Sajani Rajwar/wife

Sri Shankar Mahato 43. Sri Gulu Mahato

Sri Javed Ansari 44. Sri Sahabali Sah

45. Sri Chuter Gope

SriAssuGope

46. Sri Nawazi Mian

SriPariati Mian

Sri Ashoke Kumar 47. Sri Dharam Das

Chakroborty

48. Sri Chhotu Ram Rawani Sri Ashoke Ram 49. Sri Rustam Mian

Sri Yunus Ansari 50. Sri Panu Muchi

SriPoresh Dhiwar 748

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/ PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Name of the Workmen

New Delhi , the 25th January, 2008 Name of Departments

51. Sri Panchu Teli

SriArjunTeli

52. Sri Baleshwar Mahato Sri Badal Mahato

53. Sri Moti Nonia

Sri Sital Pd. Nonia

Sri Bahadur Mahato

54. Sri Paltu Mahato

55. Sri Bhola Roy

SriAklu Roy

Sri Rabindra Nath

56. Sri Hari Ram Pandey

S. O. 380. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947( 14 of 1947) , the Central Goverment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 64/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal , (No. II) Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 25-1-2008.

Sri Md . Hanif Ansari

57. Sri Sahabuddin Sah

Sri Nami Deshwali

58. Sri Panu Deshwali

[No. L -20012/ 12/2005 - IR(C - I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer 59. Sri Puran Ch . Das

SriNiranjan Das

ANNEXURE

Sri Chandra Kant Kachh

60. Sri Paraga! Dayaram Thakar

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2 ) AT DHANBAD 61. Sri Nandan Singh

Sri Dayanand Singh

Present:

Sri Karib Ansari

62. Sri Hatim Mian

Sri NAGENDRA KUMAR, PresidingOfficer

63. Sri Hari Lal Mahato Sri Sugan Ch . Mahato

Sri IdrisMian

64. Sri Kajam Mian

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10( 1 ) (d) ofthe I.D. Act . , 1947

65. Sri Gafur Sah

Sri Ayub Khan

Reference No. 64 of2005

66. Sri Mahabir Kora

Sri Prahlad Kora

Parties:

67. Sri Moti Mahato

Sri Mantu Mahato

63. Sri Gobind Muchi

SriNepalMuchi

Employers in relation to the management of Govindpur Area- Ill of M/s . B.C.C.L. and their workman.

69. Sri Purni Dushadhin Sri Ram Chander Dushadh

Appearances:

Sri Basir Ansari

70. Sri Kuda Bakas Mian

Onbehalf of the workman : None

Sri Banmali Rai

71. Sri Gopi Rai

Onbehalf of the employers :

Sri Kedar Prasad

72. Sri Kishun Rai

Mr. D.K. Verma, Advocate.

73. Sri Jetha Lal Sethia

Sri Parth Sarathi

State: Jharkhand

Industry: Coal Sri Laxmi Kant Rai

74. Sri Rokha Singh

75. Sri Rahman Mian

Sri Badsah Ansari

Dhanbad, the 8th January, 2008 AWARD

PARTIES TO THE DISPUTE

1. The General Manager , Mahuda Area No. II , ofM/ s. B.C.C. Ltd. P.O. Mahuda Dist . Dhanabad

TheGovt . ofIndia, Ministry of Labour & Employment in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1) (d) of the I.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012 / 12/2005 - I.R. (C- I ) , dated, the 19th July,2005.

SCHEDULE

2. The Zonal Secretary, Bihar CollieryMazdoor Sabha Baghmara Zone , 12 No. Dhaura P.O. Mahuda, Dist . Dhanbad .

JOHN BAGE , Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) Dhanbad- II

"Whether the action of the management of BCCL Govindpur Area - III in not accepting the date ofbirth of Sh . B. N. Ojha , Overman as 9-7-1947 and stopping him from work w.e.f. 13-8-2003 is just , fair and legal? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled ?"

नई दिल्ली , 25 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 380. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी. सी. सी. एल. के प्रबधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , ( सं. II ) धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 64/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-1-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

2. The case of the workman Shri B. N. Ojha in short is that he was in regular employment at Govindpur Colliery under Govindpur Area of M/ s . BCCL and his designation was Senior Overman . In the year 2000 the age dispute of the concerned workman was raised but there was no amicable settlement . Series of discussions were held in this context at the level of ALC ( C ) and there was an agreement regarding verification of the matter .

[सं. एल. 20012/12/2005- आई आर ( सी -1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

3. From the Written Statement it appears that in the matter of age dispute of the concerned workman several 749 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

BAIDYANATH OJHA

steps were taken and the matter was discussed at various level . However, the age dispute was not settled . According to the concerned workman his date ofbirth is 9-7-1947 . The demand of the concerned workman is that his date of birth may be accepted as 9-7-1947 as approved and accepted by the competent authority and communicated to theG.M. The concerned workman be allowed to resume his duty forthwith from the date he has been stopped from duty illegally and maliciously.

ofvillage Kharhater , Thana Semi , District Bhoujpur , State-Bihar born on 24th July , 1942 son of late S. P. Ojha having given satisfactory evidence of his age , medical fitness , good character , literacy and experience in Coal Mining , and having passed an examinationheld at Dhanbad on 30-11-1974 hereby granted overman's certificate under the Coal Mines Regulations , 1957.

Sd/-

Chairman of the Board

Secretary of the

ofMining Examination .

Board ofMining

Examination.

Dated 1st July, 1975 .

It is not clear why the petitioner suppressed the date ofbirth as was recorded in the matriculation certificate and placed other evidence to suggest that his date ofbirth is 24-7-1942 and on the basis of overman's certificate he was taken in the service of the respondent and his date of birth was entered as 24-7-1942 .

Now at the time of retirement the petitioner cannot raise the disputed question of date of birth nor can request the authority to reopen the issue .

There being no merit the writ petition is accordingly dismissed . "

4.Themanagement has also filed W.S. -cum-rejoinder stating that the present reference is not maintainable either in law or in facts . Present reference is hit by the principle of res-judicata. The date ofbirth of the concerned workman is recorded in all the statutory record as 24-7-1942 . As per Form B Register and other documents the concerned workman has attained the age of 60 years on 24-7-2002 and accordingly he was superannuated from the service . Management in the W.S. has given the details as to how the workman concerned had appeared before the DGMS and made admission of the fact of being 60 years of age . The details have been mentioned as to how date of birth 24-7-1942 of the concerned workman has been mentioned while issuing Mining Sirdarship certificate . It has also been stated that the concerned workman has filed a Writ Petition before the Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court vide Writ Petition (S) No. 3860/2003 . After hearing the parties the Hon'ble Court have been pleased to dismiss the Writ Petition vide order dt . 12-8-2003 . The relevant portion of the order ofthe Hon'ble Court have been mentioned which reads as follows:-

5. It has also been mentioned in the W.S. that after considering all the materials Hon'ble High Court had been pleased to dismiss the Writ petition on merit. In the rejoinder portion it has been stated that paras - 3 , 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 and 13 of the W.S. of the Union are not relevant.

"The petitioner who is in service of M/ s . BCCL is to superannuate from his service in the end of September , 2003 just one and halfmonth prior to his retirement, this writ petition has been preferred by him raising the disputed question of date of birth .

According to the petitioner the respondent should treat and correct his date of birth as 9th July, 1947 as recorded in matriculation certificate . The date ofbirth as recorded in service record and overman's certificate as 24-7-1942 was wrongly entered in the case of others . The respondents have accepted the representation to correct date of birth .

From the overman's certificate dated 1-7-1975 granted byBoard ofMining Examination it appears that the petitioner had given satisfactory evidence of his age as 24-7-1942 as quoted hereunder :

6. It further appears that the concerned workman has filed rejoinder to the W.S. of the management in which it has again been stated that actually date of birth of the concerned workman is 9-7-1947 as per admit card of Matriculation Certificate issued in the year 1965. Further statements have been made regarding tripartite settlement made before the ALC ( C) , Dhanbad on 17-7-2001 between themanagement and the union which regarding verification ofthe matter . However it maybe relevant to mention even in the rejoinder nothing has been mentioned by the concerned workman regarding the fact that he had filed a WritPetition before the Hon'ble Court as pointed out in the W.S. of the management .

"BOARD OF MINING EXAMINATION-5158

7. POINTS TO BE DECIDED

Photo

MINES ACT , 1952

"Whether the action of the management of BCCL Govindpur Area - III in not accepting the date ofbirth of Sh . B. N. Ojha, Overman as 9-7-1947 and stopping him from work w.e.f. 13-8-2003 is just, fair and legal ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled?"

Overman's Certificate under Coal Mines Regulations , 1957 .

750

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

8. FINDING WITH REASONS :

merit the order become final and the same matter cannot be reagitated before the Labour Court.

12. In the result, I find that this reference is not maintainable .

It appears from the record that inspite of issuance of registered notices and giving sufficient opportunities the concerned workman /the sponsoring union has not appeared.

NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 25 जनवरी , 2008

का. आ. 381. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. एयर इंडियां के प्रंबधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण ( सं. II ) . मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 2/25/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-1-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 11012/66/1999- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी 9. Beside the fact that in the W.S. of the management it has been mentioned that the concerned workman had filed a Writ Petition before the Hon'ble Court vide Writ Petition No. (S) 3860/2003 and on consideration of all the matters the same was dismissed on merit . The certified copy ofthe order passed by the Hon'ble Court in W.P. (S) No. 3860/2003 on 12-8-2003 has been filed from perusal of which it appears that considering all the matters the Hon'ble Court have been pleased to dismiss the Writ aplication filed by the concerned workman Shri B.N. Ojha. In this Writ application the same matter i.e. the dispute of date of birth was raised and the same has been dismised. The details of the order has already been mentioned in para -4.

New Delhi , the 25th January, 2008

S. O. 381. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Goverment hereby published the award (Ref. No. 2/25/2000) ofCentralGovernment Industrial Tribunal (No. II ) Mumbai asshown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Air India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 25-1-2008 .

[No. L- 11012/66/ 1999 - IR(C- 1) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

9. A Ld. Lawyer for the management has filed a decision reported in 2003 lab I.C. 3709 and has submitted that the concerned workman cannot raise the matter of age dispute again as the same is barred by res -judicata. He has submitted that the Hon'ble Court have been pleased to dismiss the Writ application on merit and for the same matter i.e. the dispute of date of birth cannot be raised for adjudication by this Tribunal . He has submitted that the Hon'ble Apex Court have been pleased to hold that in such circumstances when the matter is reagitated on the same issue the same is barred by the principle of res- judicata. He has also submitted that in the aforesaid circumstances this reference is not maintainable .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. II AT MUMBAI

PRESENT:

A. A. LAD, Presiding Officer Reference No. CGIT-2/25 of2000

Employers in relation to the management of Air India Ltd.

The Managing Director , AirIndia Limited, Air India Building, Nariman Point , Mumbai 400021 . ...First Party

And

Their Workman,

10. Before proceeding further it may be mentioned thattheWrit petition filed by the concerned workman before the Hon'ble Court was dismised on merit on 12-8-2003 . However, after reference was received in the year 2005 on behalf of the concerned workman the sponsoring union has filed Written Statement has not made any statement regarding filing of the Writ Petition before the Hon'ble Court on the same issue . Not only this even when this fact was pointed out in the Written Statement - cum -rejoinder on behalf of the management a rejoinder was filed by the sponsoring union but nothing has been said disputing the fact that such Writ Petition has not been filed by the coricerned workman before the Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court.

Shri Gajanan Sharma,

At & Post: Visapur, Tal . Dapoli , District Ratnagiri (Maharashtra) .... Second Party

Appearance:

Forthe Employer

For the Workman

: Mr. L. L. D'Souza, Representative . : Mr. Jaiprakash Sawant , Advocate ,

Dated of reserving Award : 24th September , 2007 DtateofPassing of Award: 26th November , 2007 11. As per submission of the Ld . Lawyer for the management and after perusal of the order of the Hon'ble Court it appear that the Hon'ble Court has been pleased to dismiss the Writ Petition of the concerned workman Shri B. N. Ojha after considering the matter of age dispute. However, the sponsoring union has raised the same matter i.e. the age dispute through this reference . From perusal of paraa- 10 and 11 of the Judgement referred to by the Ld . Lawyer for the management it appears that the matter which has already been disposed of by the Hon'ble Court on [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

751

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

AWARD

The Matrix of the facts as culled out from the proceedings are as under:

The reference is sent to this Tribunal by the Under Secretary ofCentral Government, The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L- 11012/66/99/(C - I) dated 4th February, 2000 in exercise ofthe powers conferred by Clause (d) of sub- section ( 1) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to decide:

"Whether the action of the management of Air India Ltd. ,Mumbai in removing Mr. Gajanan Sharma Vinherkar, Ex-Casual Labour from service w.e.f. 29-6-1986 is legal and justified ? If not what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

2. To support the subject matter involved in the reference , 2nd Party filed Statement of Claim at Exhibit 6 making out the case that, he joined Ist Party as a " Loader" on casual basis with it from 1980. He was getting all facilities and benefits of the workman as of the permanent employee .

3. On 28-6-1986 he was caught by the Security under the guise that, he was removing articles of the 1st Party without proper sanction . Said attempt of the 2nd Party was treated as a ' theft ' . Concerned Security Guard reported the said fact to the Management who took the 2nd Party to the Sahar Airport Ploice Station where Police case was filed. That theft case was tried before the Metropolitan Magistrate , 22nd Court at Andheri which acquitted him on 25th September , 1998. However, sir, ce 1986 he was not taken in the employment . So he approached the Assisstant labour Commissioner ( Central ) , Mumbai , after acquittal and demanded reinstatement which was not accepted by the 1st Party in conciliation proceedings . The Conciliation Officer submitted his failure report and as a result ofwhich dispute raised by the 2nd Party was sent here for adjudication asking this Tribunal to decide whether decision taken by the 1st Party in removing the 2nd party from its services w.e.f. 29th June, 1986 is just , legal and proper? 2nd Party states that , the decision taken by the Ist Party of removing him from services is not just and proper. No charge sheet was served . No enquiry was conducted and without following the due process of law he was prevented from reporting on duty. It is submitted that, said action be treated as illegal and requested to direct 1st Party to reinstate him with benefits of back wages and continuation of service .

3. This claim of the 2nd Party is disputed by the Ist Party by filing reply at Exhibit 9 making out the case that , the 2nd Party was taken on casual basis. He was not having permanent status . He cannot claim reinstatement . Criminial casewas filed against him . It resulted in acquittal . However, after about 13 years he has raised the dispute . No reason is given as to why he is late in raising the dispute. No excuses are given . Since , he is not a regular employee , the Management is not supposed to follow the procedure of removal which is followed against permanent employees . Besides charge of ' theft ' was very serious . Moreover , 2nd Party did not approach the 1st Party to consider his case and request to take him in the employment . He straight away approached the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central ) , Mumbai . He does not remain in touch with the 1stParty for his demand in those 13 years . So it is submitted that , prayer prayed by the 2nd Party to reinstate him after about 13 years does not require to be considered .

(4) In view of the above pleadings my Ld. Predecessor framed Issues at Exhibit 13 which are answered as follows:

ISSUES

FINDINGS

Yes 1. Whether , the action of the Management ofAirIndia Ltd., Mumbai in removing Mr.Gajanan Sharma Vincherkar, Ex-Casual labour from services . w.e.f. 29-6-86 is legal and justified?

2. What relief Mr. Vincherkar is entitled to?

Does not Survive .

Reasons:-

ISSUE NOS . 1 & 2:-

(5) By this reference 2nd Party Workman made out the case that he worked with the 1st Party from 1986 as a ' Loader' . Though he was taken on casual basis and as a temporary employee , he worked continuously upto 1986. By virtue of that, he acquired permanency and protection as given to the permanent empolyees under Section 25 (b ) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Under the guise of charge sheet served on him by the Magistrate's Court on case ofalleged incident dated 28th June , 1986, he was not permitted to report on duty which is not legal . So it is submitted that, the said act is not proper and requires to be set aside . Besides criminal case which was filed against him which resulted in acquittal , which was the decision of the competent authority in that field. Since he completed 240days , in a calendar , year and acquired permanency and sice he is acquitted he is entitled for reinstatement . Besides it is his case that no charge sheet was served on him . No independent departmental enquiry was conducted. No charges were proved in it . The decision taken by the 1st Party to compel him not to report on duty is not just and proper. It is arbitrary decision of the Ist Party for not allowing him to report on duty . Whereas case of the 1st Party is that, he was casual worker who worked as a ' Loader' . He was never permanent employee . He was involved in a criminal case . Though he was acquired from the Police case, it does not mean , that nothing was against him. He did not approach the 1st Party for reemployment or for any other demand in 13 years . He directly approached the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) who was unalbe to settle the demand of the 2nd Party and was unable to convince the 1st Party to accept the demand of the 2nd Party as 2nd Party raised dispute after about 13 years 752

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4 , 1929

without any explanation and excuses. So it is case of Ist party that prayer of this type being stale one , does not require to be considered.

(6) To prove that, 2nd Party placed reliance on his affidavit, filed in lieu of examination - in-chief, at Exhibit 17. Whereas Ist Party placed its reliance on the affidavit of its witness, Assistant Manager-Personnel Mrs. Stella D'Souza filed at Exhibit 22. 2nd Party submittedwritten argument at Exhibit 33 whereas 1st Party filed it atExhibit 34 with some citations .

Shivalinga) . There also dispute was raised after ten years observing the delay of this nature would render the claim stale. By placing reliance on another citation published in 2002 ( 2 ) LLN 21 ( SC ) ( Nedugadi Bank Ltd. K.P. Madhavankutty & ors . ) where Apex Court observed that , though there is no limit prescribed to make a reference , it does not that, dispute can be referred at any time . However , citation published in 1997 ( 77 ) FLR page 96 where Apex Court observed that , claim after long time would not be entertained. However , said was in respect of prayer prayed under Section 33 ( C) (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 . Besides other citations referred by Ist Party's Advocate about status of 2nd Party where burden is shifted to workman to prove that he worked for more than 240 days . Inmy considered view it cannot be made applicable to this case. Citation referred by him published in 2005 ( 107 ) FLR page 1145 ( SC ) ( Surendernagar Dist . Panchayat Vs S. J. Pitambhar) , citation published in 1997 II CLR p.15 (Hamanshu Vidyarti Vs State of Bihar ) and citation published in 2001 LLN p . 260 ( Telecom District Manager and org . Vs Angali & Ors . ( Karnataka High Court) are of no use, since in the instant case working of 2nd Party with 1st Party from 1980 to 1986 in not denied. It is only the case of the 1st Party that , he worked as a casual Labourer and did not acquire permanency. However, working with 1st Party for more than 240 days by the 2nd Party, is established and even it is admitted by the Ist Party . So in that case , and in my considered view, it is not necessary that, the 2nd Party can be burdened to prove that he completed 240 days to acquired permanency with the 1st Party .

(7) In the evidence 2nd Party narrated his story in whatway he was taken and how many years he worked. However, in the cross he admits that , no appointment order was given to him. He admits that, he was taken as a casual loader . he admits that he worked as a casual liader and was getting salary on daily wages basis . He admits that, he never complained about his status as a casual labourer . He admits that , he was caught by Security on 28th June , 1986 andwas produced before Sahair Air Port Police Station . He admits that, criminal case was filed against him. He states that driminal case ended in acquittal . Even he admits that, he did not sent any letter to the Management after 28th June , 1986 ie . after he was arrested by Sahair Air Port Police Station and requested the Management to take him in the employment . Even he admits that, he did not request the mangement to take him in the employment . Even he has not produced any documents on record to show that, he intimated the result of the criminal case to the Management . Against that , 1st Party's witness in affidavit at Exhibit 22 deny the case of the 2nd Party and admits that, he has not seen the record of the proceedings and is not aware ofthe judgment of the criminal Court .

10.However, as delay is main hurdle in the way of the 2nd Party and which is admitted by him and which is not explained by him in my considered view it is a main factor in the way of the 2nd Party since after 1986 admittedly the dispute is raised in 1999 i.e. after about 13 years . 2nd Party admits that , he did not approach the 1st Party for work. Even he admits that , he did not wrote to the 1st Party and demanded reemployment . Even he admits that , he did not contact the Ist Party and made a grievance about his reemployment . So all this reveals that, he kept mum allowing to flow water and all of a sudden decided to approach the Assistant Labour Commission (Central ) in 1999 which does not permit him to so, though there is no limit to make a reference.

(8) In the light ofthis evidence Ld Advocate for the 2nd Partytried to make out the case that, no procedure was followedwhile stopping 2nd Party from reporting on duty . When according to him he has completed ' 240' days , he gets protection under Section 25 (b ) and said dismissal is required to taken as retrenchment U/ section 2 (oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. He relied on citation published in 1995 II CLR page 580. However , if we peruse the copy ofthe said citation to see whether the fact of that case permit to utilize the ratio in the instant case. We find said facts of the said case are different than the case at hand. So I am ignoring the citation referred by the 2nd Party's Advocate .

11. It is an admitted position that he was charge sheeted by Sahar Police and prosecuted in the Court . It is anadmitted position that, he was tried in Criminal Court. It may be that, he might have been acquitted because of unsatisfactory evidence before the Magistrate . It does not mean that , it was all OK with him and he was innocent.

12. It is to be noted that, he worked as a ' Loader ' and the charge of theft is leveled against such a person who is giventhe work of loading and unloading . Question arises how this person has moral to claim reemployment, that too after 13 years ?

(9) Against that, Ist Part's Advocate referred number of citations to show that, such a delay which is not explained by the 2nd Party of 13 years , does not permit such an employee to claim the employment . For that he relied on citationpublished in 2006 ( 110) FLR page 803 where Apex Court while deciding the case of Manager (now Regional Director) , RBI vs Gopinath Sharma observed that matter for adjudication nearly after 13 years require to treat as a stale dispute and cannot be the subject matter of the reference.He also relied on citation published in 2002 (2) LLN 19 (SC) (Assistant Executive Engineer , Karnataka vs 753 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

Dated, Dhanbad , the 14th January , 2008

AWARD

13. So ifwe consider all this , coupled with the case made outby both , I conclude that , the 2nd Party is not entitled to reinstatement with back wages . So I answer the above Issue to that effect and passes the following order.

ORDER

Reference is rejected with no Order as to its costs.

Mumbai , A. A. LAD, Presiding Officer

The Govt. of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1) (d) ofthe I. D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 12011 /239/2001 - IR (B -II ) dated , the 16thMay, 2002 .

26thNovember, 2007.

SCHEDULE

नई दिल्ली , 29 जनवरी , 2008

"Whether the action of the management of Bank of India, Jamesdpur Zone is justified in conducting another selection process without exhausting the existingpanel of selected candidates for the post of ComputerOperator ? Ifnot, what reliefthe concerned workmen are entitled to ? "

का. आ. 382.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. -2 , घनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 41/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-1-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. 12011/239/2001- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi,the 29th January, 2008

2. In this case both the parties appeared through their authorised representative and filed their respective W. S. documents etc. The other union i.e. the General Secretary, Bank of India Employees Union which has been impleaded as a party to the reference vide this Tribunal's order dt . 5-11-2004 also appeared and filed their W. S. documents etc. Thereafter the case proceeded along its course. Subsequently at the stage of evidence both the parties including the impleaded union have appeared and filed a Memorandum of settlement under their signature.

S. O. 382. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 41 / 2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. 2, Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure , inthe Industrial dispute between the management ofBank of India and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 29-1-2008 .

[No. L- 12011/239/2001 - IR(B -II) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

Perused the setttlement petition and heard both sides including the impleaded union . I find that the terms of settlement are fair , proper and in accordance with the principle ofnatural justice . Accordingly the said settlement petition is accepted and anAward is passed in terms thereof which forms part of the Award as Annexure .

ANNEXURE

NAGENDRA KUMAR, PresidingOfficer BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD

ANNEXURE

PRESENT:

SHRI NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer

BEFORE THE HON'BLE PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1)( d) of the I. D. Act, 1947

Reference Case No. 41/2002

Reference No. 41 of 2002

Industrial Dispute over alleged irregularities in selection of Computer Terminal Operators

Between

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Bank of India, Jamshedpur Zone and their workmen.

TheManagement of Bank of India, Jamshedpur Zone --Management Appearances:

Onbehalf of the employers

Vs.

: Mr. A. R. Sarkar , Sr.Manager (P)

The Zonal Secretary , Bank of India Employees' Association , Bihar Jharkhand --Workmen Zonal Office , BOI , Jamshedpur .

Onthe behalf of the workmen

Humble Petition on behalf of Parties (Petitioners) to the Dispute

Mostrespectfully sheweth :

Mr. J. K. Khawash , Zonal Secretary, BOIEA Bihar- Jharkhand

(i) that the reference has been pending before this Hon'ble tribunal for adjudication ;

State : Jharkhand

Industry: Banking .

754

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4 , 1929

(ii) that the parties to the dispute have now arrived at a settlement to resolve the issues in the dispute to settle the matter amicably among themselves and the said Settlement mutually agreed upon by all the parties is enclosed for perusal and subject ofthe wisdom of this Hon'ble Tribunal ;

(iii) that the parties humbly pray for adjudication and passing of necessary orders as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper ;

for adjudication vide its Order Ref. No. L- 12011/239/2001- IR-(B- II ) } dated 16-5-2002. In course ofhearing , Bank of India employees Union, Jharkhand State filed a petition for its impleadment , as a party , in the dispute pending for adjudication . The Hon'ble Tribunal was pleased to order for impleadment ofBank of India Station Union, Jharkhand State as a party to the process of adjudication of the said dispute. Therefore, the hearings were conducted in the matter. Now, the parties to the dispute hereby agrees to resolve the subject matter ofdispute amicably and agree as under :

TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT And for such act of grace of your honour , the petitioners , as duty bound shall ever pray.

Dated at Jamshedpur this 11th day of January 2008 .

(Dinesh Jha ' Lallan' )

(J.K. Khawas) (A.R. Sarkar)

1. Bank of India Employees ' Association , Bihar- Jharkhand declares and clarifies that the dispute over the process of preparation of panel , in response to the Notice Ref. No. RO : PERS : PR : 2000-1 : 1596 dated 3rd November, 2000 , no more exists .

General Secretary, BOIEU Jharkhand State for Workmen

Zonal Secretary, Sr. Manager (P) BOIEABihar- Jharkhand for Workmen & Authorised

Zonal Office, BOI , Jamshedpur Officer -for Management

Annexure- 1

2. The Parties to the process of adjudication on the matter agree that the Selection and assignment of duties of Computer Terminal Operator , which remains incomplete and pending for the reason of the matter being pendingbefore the Hon'ble Tribunal , Dhanbad, shall be done in accordance with the provisions of the Settlements dated 9th March, 1994 and 29th September, 1998 and extant instructions relating thereto .

Memorandum of settlement Dated 11th January , 2008 arrived at between the Management of Bank of India, Jamshedpur Zone and Bank of India Employees ' Union , Jharkhand State & Bank of India Employees ' Association, Bihar-Jharkhand .

3. The Management of Bank of India , in Jamshedpur Zone shall now complete the process of Selection and assignment of duties of Computer Terminal Operator accordingly .

The matter relating to the dispute, which arose over the selection and assignment of duties of Computer Terminal Operator in terms ofthe Notice dated 03/11/2000 was discussed in detail among the Parties . The following representatives were present :

This Settlement is signed by the Parties for the purpose of filing before The Presiding Officer , C.G.I.T. - II , Dhanbad ( Camp - Jamshedpur) and praying the Hon'ble Presiding Officer to pass an award in the Ref. No. 41/2002 in terms of this Settlement .

OnBehalf of Bank of India Employees ' Union , Jharkhand State

OnBehalf ofManagement of Bank of India , Jamshedpur Zone

eight. Dated this Eleventh Day of January , Two thousand

Signature of Parties

1. Mr. Dinesh Jha Lallan , General Secretary

1. Mr. A.R. Sarkar , Senior Manager ( P)

2.Mr. S.K. Adak, DeputyGeneral Secretary

On Behalf of Management ofBank of India , Jamshedpur Zone (A.R. Sarkar)

On Behalf of Bank of India Employees' Union, Jharkhand State (Dinesh Jha Lallan) OnBehalf of Bank of IndiaEmployees ' Association , Bihar- Jharkhand

(S. K. Adak) On Behalf of Bank of IndiaEmployees ' Association , Bihar- Jharkhand

1.Mr. Abhijit Mallick ,, General Secretary,

(AbhijitMallick) 2. Mr. J.K. Khawas , Organising Secretary

SHORT RECITAL

(J.K. Khawas)

WITNESSES

(S.R. PILLA)

(K.V. PAI) (MOHAN LAL ARORA) On the dispute raised by Bank of India Employees ' Association, Bihar- Jharkhand over the preparation of panel and assignment of duties of computer Terminal Operator therefrom, the Government of India , Ministry of Labour was pleasedto refer the dispute to the C.G.I.T. - 11 , Dhanbad 755 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नईदिल्ली, 6 फरवरी , 2008

नईदिल्ली , 4 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 383.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण (नं. II ) नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 51/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-2-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.-22012/174/2007- आई आर (सीएम- II ) ]

का. आ. 384, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केंन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( सं. II ) धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 165/1999) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-2-2008 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।

स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी

[सं. एल. - 12012/215/1998- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] NewDelhi , the 4th February, 2008

राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi, the 6th February, 2008

S. O. 383. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby published the award (Ref. No. 51/2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. II New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workmen, receivedby the Central Government on 4-2-2008 ..

[No. L-22012/174/2007- IR(CM- II)]

S. O. 384. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Goverment hereby published the award (Ref. No. 165/1999) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court (No. II) Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in the . Industrial Dispute between the management of Bank of India, and theirworkmen, which was received by the Central Government on 5-2-2008.

SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

[No. L- 12012/215/1998- IR(B-II)] ANNEXURE

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVT. INDUTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT NO. II AT NEW DELHI

ID No. 51/2007

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2) AT DHANBAD

R. N. RAI, Presiding Officer In the matter of:

PRESENT:

Shri Nagendra Kumar, Presiding Officer

Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1 ) (d) ofthe I. D. Act. , 1947

-Claimant

Reference No. 165 of 1999

Shri Jadurai Ram , HandlingWorker, 22-C, Prem Nagar, Nangloi, Delhi-41 Versus

PARTIES: Employers in relation to the management of Bank of India, Regional Office , Palkot Road, Gumla and their workmen .

Their Regional Manager , Food Corporation of India, DistrictOffice: Shakti Nagar Delhi- 110007

-Respondent

Appearances:

AWARD

On behalf oftheworkman None

Onbehalf ofthe employers

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L-22012/174/ 2007 -IR(CM- II ) Central Govcernment Dt. 27-8-2007 has referred the following point for adjudication .

Mr. R. A. Chamaria, Advocate.

The point runs as hereunder :-

State:Jharkhand

Industry: Banking.

Dated, Dhanbad, the 22nd January, 2008

AWARD

"Whether the action of the management of Food Coropration of india in terminating the services of Shri Jadurai Ram w.e.f. 29-8-2006 is legal andjustified? Ifnot, to what relief is the workman entitled. "

TheGovt. ofIndia, Ministry of Labour in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I. D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to thisTribunal for adjustication vide their Order No. L- 12012/ 215/1998 - IR (B - II) dated, the 23rd March, 1999.

Ittranspires from perusal of the order sheet that this reference was received on 5-9-2007 . Three dates were given to the workman for filing claim statement . The workman was not present on any of the dates . No claim statement has been filed despite last opportunity given.

No dispute award is given.

Date: 29-1-2008 .

R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer

"Whether the demand of the union to regularise Sh. Om Prakash Verma, Part - Time Sweeper by the 470 GI/08-15 756

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ] management ofBank of India is justified and proper ? If yes, what reliefthe workman is entitledto?

240 days either in a calendar year or a period of 12 months . The concerned person was never appointed nor was given any letter of appointment.

4. In the rejoinder portion in para- 14 it has been stated that the workman was never appointed by the Bank of India at its Lohardaga branch in the year 1984 or at any other branch or any other date . While referring para 2, 3 , 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 , 9, and 11 to 14 of the W.S. of the workman it has been stated that the statements are not correct and the same are absolutely false and baseless and the same has been denied . It has also been denied that the concerned personwas ever appointed.

5. POINTS TO BE DECIDED

"Whether the demand of the union to regularise Sh . Om Prakash Verma , Part - time Sweeper by the management of Bank of India, justified& Proper ? If yes, what relief the workman is entitles to ?"

6. FINDING WITH REASONS

2. The case of the concerned workman in short as disclosed in the Written Statement is that he (Sri Om Prakash Verma) was originally appointed as part - time Sweeper in the Bank of India, Lohardanga Branch ( Gumla Region) in the year 1984. In fact he has been working as full time Sweeper against permanent vacancy as permanent workman. He has been working regulary since 1984 and continuously having put in more than 240 days attendance in each calendar year . Through the concerned workman is working as Full time Sweeper but the management has not regularised him nor paid him wages with regular pay scale. Themanagement has been paying the concerned workman bonus through S/B Account No. 2935. When he started demanding regularisation and regular pay scale the anti- labour management stopped the payment of Bonus after 1995. He requested the management several times to regularise his services . The action of the management in not regularising the concerned workman as Sweeper and not paying him regular pay scale of sweeper is illegal , arbitrary and unjustified and against the principle ofnatural justice. Prayer has been made to answer the reference in favouroftheworkman.

Itappears that after filing W.S. -cum -rejoinder by the management the concerned workman/sponsoring union did not appear to file any rejoinder. Even no witness has been examined by the concerned workman/ sponsoring union or no document in support of the claim has been filed. The onus lies upon the sponsoring union to prove the claim of the concerned workman.

7. Mr. R. A. Chamaria , Ltd. Lawyer for the management has submitted that the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief as he has not produced any witness or document in support of his claim . He has also filed a decision reported in 2001 Lab 1.C. 64 to show that appointment cannot be made without complying with the provision of rules relating to the appointment. He has submitted that in the instant case the concerned workman was never appointed even as part time Sweeper . He was never appointed against any vacancy. Thus in these circumstances the concerned workman is not entitled to getanyrelief.

Since the concerned workman/ sponsoring union has not filed any document and has not produced any witness , it appears that his case is not established and accordingly on the basis of materiais on record he cannot be granted any relief. In the result, the following Award isrendered :-

"The demand of the Union to regularise Sh . Om Prakash Verma, Part -time Sweeper by the management of Bank of India is not justified and proper . Consequently, the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief. "

NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 6 फरवरी , 2008

3. In this case the management has filed W.S. -cum- rejoinder in which it has been stated that this reference is not maintainable either in law or in facts . The concerned person is not a workman under the I.D. Act, 1947 and no relationship of employer and employee ever existed between the management and the concerned person . The management is required to follow employment procedure atthe time ofrecruitment of employees into the services of the Bank. No officer of the Bank at the branch level has been empowered to select or to recruit any employee whatsoever on the roll of the Bank according to his own chosce making any kind of selection. According to the constitutional provision in the public sector undertakings rules of selection and recruitment of employee has to be followed. The names of eligible candidates are called from the employment exchange . The concerned person was never engaged in the service of the Bank . He was not engaged in accordance with the recruitment procesure by the competent authority. The concerned person was never engaged by the management of Bank of India nor he ever held the status of workman/ employee of the management . The concerned person is not a workman. It has further been stated that the concerned person was never selected as per employment procedure following the procedure/rules ofemployment. The concerned person was intermittently engaged as and when required on daily wages as casual part time Sweeper/Coolie at Getalsud Branch of the Bank to cleanthe premises when regular/parttime employee did not report for his duty. His engagement was purely need based. He was not engaged when he was not required. The concerned person has never worked for a period of

का. आ. 385. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रंबधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , 757 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4 , 1929

अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2 घनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 169/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-2-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. - 12012/219/98- आई आर ( बी-11 ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi, the6th February, 2008

S. O. 385. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 169/ 1999) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court No. 2, Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 5-2-2008 .

[No. L- 12012/219/ 1998 - IR(B- II)] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2) AT DHANBAD

Bank of India at Getaisud Branch on 12-7-93. Actually he was appointed against permanent vacancy in permanent nature ofjob but he was neither designated as part -time Sweeper nor as full time Sweeper. Actually the concerned workman has been working as full time permanent sweeper since the date of appointment continuously and he has put in more than 240 days attendance in each calendar year. He was working regularly and continuously against permanent vacancy as full time permanent sweeper . He was working in place of Raju Ghashi who was transferred toKhelari . He is the only Sweeper working in the Bank in place of Raju Ghashi . The Branch manager had written a letter dt. 4-12-95 to the higher authority to regularise his services.However, again letter was written to the Branch Manager on 14-6-96 to the higher authority pointing out the above mentioned facts to regularise the services ofthe concerned workman . Inspite ofthe above facts due to anti- labour attitude the management did not regularise the services of the concerned workman as Sweeper nor paid the concerned workman regular pay scale of Sweeper . The matter was represented before the higher authority but without any result. Accordingly in the aforesaid facts and circumstances it was prayed to answer the reference in favour ofthe concerned workman .

PRESENT:

Shri Nagendra Kumar , Presiding Officer

Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10( 1)

(d)ofthe I. D.Act. , 1947 .

Reference No. 169 of1999

Parties:Employers in relation to the management ofBank ofIndia, Ranchi Region and their workman.

Appearance:

Onbehalf of the workman : None

Onthe behalf of the employers : Mr. R. A. Chamaria, Advocate.

State : Jharkhand

Industry: Banking .

Dated, Dhanbad, the 22nd February, 2008 .

AWARD

1. TheGovt. of India, Ministry ofLabour , in exercise ofthe powers conferred on them under Section 10(1)(d) of the 1. D. Act. , 1947 has referred the following dispute to thisTribunal for adjudication vide their order No. L - 12012/ 219/98- IR(B- II) dated, the 22/30-3-99.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the refusal of the management ofBank of India, to regularise the services of Sh . Birsa Oraon as Part-time Sweeper is correct and justified ? If not, whatreliefthe concerned workmen entitled is ?"

3. On the other hand in the W. S. -cum-rejoinder on behalf of the employer in relation to the Bank of India, Ranchi it has been stated that the management is required to follow the employment procedure at the time of recruitment of employees into the services ofthe Bank. No officer ofthe Bank at the branch level has been empowered to select or recruit any employee whatsoever on the roll of theBank according to his own choice . Certain procedures are followed in relation to the appointment of employees in the Bank. Names of eligible candidates are called from employment exchange . The concerned person was never engaged in the services of the Bank . He was not engaged in accordance with the recruitment procedure by the competent authority. The management had never engaged the concerned person nor he ever held the status of the workman/employee of the management. The concerned personwas never selected and recruited as per employment procedures and as per rule of employment . Thus the relationship of employer and employee between the management and the concerned person never existed. It has further been stated in the W. S. that the concerned persons was intermittently engaged as and when required on daily wages as casual part time sweeper/coolie at Getalsud Branch of the Bank to clean the premises when regular/part -time employee did not report for duty. His engagement was purely need based. He was not engaged when he was not required . The concerned workman has never worked for a period 240 days either in a calendar year or in a period of 12 months . The concerned person was never appointed nor was given any letter of appointment by the Bank. Hence neither the question of termination at 2. The case ofthe workman as disclosed in the W. S. submitted by the sponsoring union on behalf of the concernedworkman in short is that the concerned workman ShriBirsaOraon was appointed as part time Sweeper inthe 758

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 14/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-2-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

any point of time can arise nor can arise the question of violation ofSection 25F of the I. D. Act. 1947. The entire case is without any merit and the demand of the concerned person for regularisation in service and the pay scale is illegal, unjustified and fit to be rejected. He is not entitled to get any relief as claimed for.

[सं. एल- 12012/06/2007- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ]

अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 6th February, 2008 4. In the rejoinder portion it has been pointed out that the statement made by the concerned person regarding appointment and vacancy for the post of part/full time Sweeper at the concerned branch is not correct and the same has been denied.

5. POINTS TO BE DECIDED .

Whether the refusal of the management ofBank of Indiato regularise the services ofSh . Birsa Oraon as Part-time Sweeper is correct and justified ? If not, what reliefthe workman is entitled ?"

S. O. 386. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 14/ 2007) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court - II , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of india, and their workmen , received by the Central Govemment on 6-2-2008 .

6. FINDING WITH REASONS

[No. L- 12012/06/2007- IR(B- I)] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT-IL, NEW DELHI

ID. No. 14/2007

Presiding Officer: R. N.Rai .

IN THEMATTEROF :-

It appears that after filing of W. S.-cum-rejoinderby themanagementthe concerned workman/sponsoring union did not appear to file any rejoinder. Even no witness has been examined by the concerned workman/ sponsoring union or document in support of the claim has been filed. Burden of proofrests upon the sponsoring union to prove the claim ofthe concerned workman .

Shri Girvar Singh, Claimant

Sr.Assistant Gali No. 19, House No. 3761 , Ragarpura, Karol Bagh , New Delhi -110005.

VERSUS

Respondent TheDy. General Manager ,

StateBank of India,

Personnel Banking Branch , 11, Parliament Street,

New Delhi- 110001.

AWARD

7.Mr. R. A. Chamaria, Ld. Lawyer for the management has submitted that the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief as he has not produced any witness or document in support of his claim . He has also filed a decision reported in 2001 Lab I.C. 64 to show that appointment cannot be made without complying with the provision of rules relating to the appointment . He has submitted that in the instant case the concerned workman was never appointed even as part time Sweeper. He was never appointed against any vacancy. Thus in these circumstances the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief.

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 12012/06/ 2007 IR(B -I) Central Government Dt . 23-5-2007 has referred the following point for adjudication .

The point runs as hereunder:-

Since the concerned workman/sponsoring union has not filed any document has not produced any witness , it appears that his case is not established and accordingly on the basis of materials on record he cannot be granted any relief. In the result, the following Award is rendered:-

"Whether the action of the management of StateBank of India imposing the penalty of removal from services with effect form 13-9-2005 in respect of Shri Girvar Singh is legal and justified ? If not, what reliefthe applicant is entitled to?"

"The refusal of the management ofBank of Indiato regularise the services of Sh. Birsa Oraon as part - time Sweeper is correct and justified. Consequently, the concerned.workman is not entitled to get any relief."

NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer

Theworkman has filed application for withdrawal of the case as a settlement has been reached between the management and the workman . There remains no dispute inview ofthe withdrawal,

नई दिल्ली, 6 फरवरी , 2008

No dispute award is given. Date: 29-1-2008.

R. N. RAI, Presiding Officer का. आ. 386. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टैट [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

759

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

नई दिल्ली, 6 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 387. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार क्षेत्रीय ग्रामीण बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 109/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को6-2-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 12012/124/2004- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 6th February, 2008 S. O. 387. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 109/ 2004) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur, as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Kshetriya Gramin Bank, and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 6-2-2008.

[No. L- 12012/ 124/2004- IR(B-I)] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

Workman/Union No. CGIT/LC/ R/ 109/2004 Presiding Officer Shri C. M. Singh Shri Kashi Prasad Rajak, S/o Sh . Khailadi Pd. Rajak, Villgae-Khodal, PO Sindri , Distt. Shahdol (MP)

Versus

The General Manager , Kshetriya Gramin Bank, BurharRoad, Shahdol (MP)

Management Passed on this 24th day of January, 2008 1. The Government of India, Ministry ofLabour, vide its Notification No. L- 12012/ 124/2004- IR(B- I) dated 8-10-04 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

"Whether the action of the management ofKshetriya Gramin Bank, Shahdol ( MP) in terminating the services of Sh . Kashi Prasad Rajak, S/o Sh . Kheladi Prasad Rajak is legal and justified ? Ifnot, what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

2.Vide order dated 27-8-07 passed on the ordersheet of this reference proceeding the reference proceeded exparte against the workman.

3. The workman has not filed any statement of claim. The management has also not filed any Written Statement.

4. It is a no evidence case . Therefore, the reference deserves to be answered in favour of the management and against the workman without any orders as to costs .

5. In view ofthe above, the reference is answered in favour ofthe management and against the workman without any orders as to costs holding that the action of the management of Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Shahdol (MP ) in terminatingthe services of Sh . Kashi Prasad Rajak, S/o Sh . Kheladi Prasad Rajak is legal and justified and consequently the workman is not entitled to any relief.

6. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry ofLabour and Employment asper rules.

C. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 6 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 388. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार डाक विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट, औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार/औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआई टी/एलसी/आर/31/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-2-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40011/50/2003- आई आर (डी.यू. ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 6th February, 2008

S. O. 388. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/ LC/R/31/04) Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the the management of Department ofPost and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 04-2- 2008.

[No. L-40011/50/2003 - IR(DU) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/31 / 04 Presiding Officer: Shri C. M. Singh Shri Onkarlal Chauhan , C/ o Kaushal Baboo Ramchandra , GardenNo. 19 , PeatRoad , Mhow,. Indore

Workman/Union

Versus

The Supdt. of Post Offices , Deptt . of Posts , Muffasil Division, Indore. Management 760

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/ PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ] AWARD

reference in favour of the management .

Passed on this 9th day of January, 2008

4. Workman Shri Onkarlal Chauhan moved an application for closing the reference wherein he submitted thathehas no objection in treating the case as closed and withdrawn provided that an order of no award is passed in this reference:

1. TheGovernment of India, Ministry ofLabour, vide itsNotification No. L-40011 /50/2003 - IR(DU) dated 9-3-04 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

5. It is very clear from the above that the workman does not want to prosecute this reference as no industrial dispute is left between the parties . In view of the above application , no dispute award is passed in this reference without any ordes as to costs .

"Whether the action of the management of Supdt. PostOffices , Mofussil Division , Indore in not regularizing the services even after completing more than 240 days in a calendar year and not providing compassionate appointment to Sh. Onkarlal Chouhan isjustified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled for ?"

6. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment asper rules .

C.M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 6 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 389. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय जबलपुर के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 83/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को6-2-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 12012/18/2001- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 6th February , 2008

2. The case of workman Shri Onkarlal Chauhan in brief is as follows . That his father Late Shri Hiralal was holding the post of E.D.M.C. at village and post Aahu , District Dhar (MP) , permanently for the last several years . During his illness before his death and after his death, the workman was actually and physically working in the capacity ofa substitute for his father . The Workman was working as E.D.M.C at the post office of Aahu , with the knowledge and permission of the Suptd. of Post Offices , Muffasil Division, Indore . The workman through correspondence with the Suptd . of Post offices , Muffasil Division, Indore prayed for regularisation of the post of E.D.M.C and compassionate appointment in place of his father. When no relief was granted to the workman , he preferred a departmental appeal with the Post Master General, Indore but no relief was granted to him . The workman has already worked as a subsitute for a continuous period of240 days and he is qualified and he is eligible in all respect for holding the post of E.D.M.C. In accordance with the departmental rules and regulations , his son is entitled to get compassionate appointment after thedeath of his father . The workman has prayed that he be declaredas regular on the aforesaid post and may be given compassionate appointment in place of his father .

S. O. 389. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Goverment hereby published the Award ( Ref. 83/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Union Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 06-2-2008 .

[No. L- 12012/ 18/2001 - IR(B- II)] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/ 83/2001

Workman/Union

Presiding Officer ; Shri C. M. Singh Shri Sunil Bhati , S/ o Arjunlal Bhati , R/o House No. 10 , Sairanipura, Ratlam(MP)

Versus

3.The case ofthe management in briefs is as follows . The father ofworkman Shri Onkarlal Chauhan was working in the department as Extra Departmental Mail Carrier in Aahu branch Post Office , Distt. Dhar. He expired on 2-6-96. Applicant Shri Chauhan was never an employee of the department nor he has worked as substitute in place ofhis , father . The applicant produced certificate given by Sarpanch Aahu on 2-10-01 i.e. just before the application ofapplicant filed on 14-10-01 . It is clear that the applicant wants to use this certificate for this case and for his own benefits only.The applicant has no legal document to prove that he worked as a substitute . The applicant has no doubt applied for compassionate appointment . His case was legallyconsidered and rejected . The applicant cannot claim for compassionate appointment on the basis that he worked as a substitute for 240 days . In view of the facts and circumstances mentioned above, the reference is liable to be rejected and the tribunal be pleased to answer the

TheDy. General Manager, Union Bank ofIndia Zonal Office , Ist Floor, Gangotri Complex, Bhadbhada Ist Road, T.T. Nagar , Bhopal(MP)

Management 761 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

AWARD

Passed on this 28th day of January , 2008

1. TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour, vide its Notification No. L - 12012/ 18/2001 - IR( B - II) dated 26-4-2001 has referred the following dispute for adjudication bythis tribunal :- ९

"Whether the action ofthe management of Regional Manager, Union Bank of India, Indore in terminating the service of Shri Sunil Bhati w.e.f. 15-12-1998 and not regularizing him as a full time peon is justified ? Ifnot, what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

terminated the Services of disputant applicant since the applicant still continues to work in 1 /3rd scale of pay at Dakachya Branch. Therefore the terms of reference is bad and liable to be rejected in limine. The applicant was given employment as part- time sweeper on the stipend ofRs.200 permonth videorder dated 10-1-90, This appointment as a stipendiary doesnot confer any right to convert him as regular full time sweeper or peon. Letter dated 13-5-1992 was not a letter of regular appointment as the applicant's appointment as part -time sweeper at Rs.200 per month stipend was taken into regular strength of the Bank. The claim ofthe applicant for engaging him as full time sweeper cannot be considered . The applicant was never made permanent or permitted to work as full time peon in absence ofthe regular peon . Workman Shri Sunil Bhati is not entitled to any reliefand the reference be answered in the negative, against the applicant and in favour of the Bnak.

4.Vide order dated 29-12-05, the reference proceeded exparte against the workman.

5. As the reference proceeded exparte against the workman, there is no evidence on record on behalf of the workman.

6. The management in order to prove their case filed affidavit of their witness Shri G.Y.. Mishra, then working as ChiefManager, Union Bank of India, Regional Office, Indore (MP).

7. I have heard exparte argument advanced by Shri S.K.Rao , Advocate for management and very carefully gone through the evidence on record.

8. The case of the management is fully proved from the uncontroverted and unchallenged affidavit of management's witness Shri G.Y. Mishra . Therefore the reference deserves to be answered in favour of the management and against the workman without any orders as to costs.

9. Inview of the above , the reference is answered in favour ofthe management and against the workman without any orders as to costs holding that the action of the management of Regional Manager, Union Bank of India, Indore in terminating the services of Shri Sunil Bhati w.e.f. 15-12-1998 and not regularising him as a full time peon is justified. Consequently the workman is not entitled to any relief.

10. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment asper rules.

C. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली, 6 फरवरी , 2008

2.The case ofworkmen Shri Sunil Bhati in brief is as follows . That he was appointed by the Branch Manager of Union Bank of India, Namli on the post ofpart time sweeper on 12-3-90 and is still working on the same post . He was selected by the Branch Manager after receiving the name ofthe petitioner through employment exchange . He was given fixed salary of Rs.440 per month . He was given appointment of peon on 7-10-95 because Peon (Daftari ) Shri Harish Joshi was Promoted to the post of clerk so the workman was allowed to work as Peon-cum-Daftari from the above date and he was drawing salary for both the postfrom 7-10-95. He has worked for the Post of part time sweeper/daftari as well as Daftari from 17-8-95 to 31-11-98. He has been working since 10.30 A.M to 5.30 P.M continuouslyfrom 17-8-95 tilldate. He has been exploited by the Branch Managers who have been working in the said branch. The recommendatory and approval letter of the Personnel Department, Regional Office , Indore to Chief Manager, Personnel Anchalik Zonal Office, Bhopal dated 1-11-95 is lucid and manifest and very clear that on the promotion of regular Daftari on the post of clerk the petitioner was appointed in place of regular Daftari and there was no other regular Peon except one who was not able to complete the work. The workman made representation on 15-12-98 for his regular appointment on the post of attender becuase since then the post was laying vacant but it yielded no result . The Branch Manager has also written to the Divisonal Office reminding that after promotion ofShri Harish Joshi from the post of Daftari to clerk, the part time sweeper was working on the post of Daftari and the post of Daftari is still lying vacant in the Barnch Office Namli . The impunged order of terminating the services of the workman is without jurisdiction and arbitrary. It is illegal . The workman has acquired the status of the permanent employee in the Bank because he has already worked for maore than 240 days continuously. Neither he was given retrenchment notice or a month's salary in lieu thereof. The workman comes from Scheduled Caste. His termination order w.e.f. 15-12-98be quashed andhe may be regularised as full time peon.

3. The case of the management in briefis as follows. The reference made to the Hon'ble tribunal is totally vague , untenable and speaks non - application of mind in framing the terms of reference . The management Bank never

का. आ. 380. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. ई. सी. एल. के प्रंबधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 145/2003 ) को प्रकाशित 762

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4, 1929

करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को6-2-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.-22012/260/2002- आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ]

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 6th February, 2008

S. O. 390. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby published the Award (Ref. 145/2003 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Jamuna 1/2 Mines of SouthEastern Coalfields Ltd. and their workmen, received bythe Central Government on 6-2-2008 .

[No. L-22012/260/2002- IR(CM- II) ]

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/ 145/03

PresidingOfficer, Shri C. M. Singh

ThePresident

Samyuktha Koyala Mazdoor Sangh ( AITUC )

C/OSanjay Kumar Mishra Telephone exchange ,

POKotma Colliery,

...Workman/Union

Shahdpl . versus

writer's report in his own hand every day . The workman has also recorded the details of loading done by the individual loader in his own record . Through the workman has been continuously made to work as Tub Munshi w.e.f. 1-1-90 but formal authorization letter was issued to him on 10-8-91 . In view of provisions of clause 3.5 of certified standing order applicable to management the workman became entitled to be regularised on the post of. Clerk Gr- III. In addition to above , as per circulars issued when a workman is made to work on a higher post continuously for a period of 240 days on surface and 190 days in underground in a calendar year , he becomes entitled for regularisation on the said higher post . Though the workman was throughout working as Clerk Gr . III since 1-1-90, but he was not being paid the salary applicable to the post . The management did not regularise the workman on the post of Clerk Gr. III though he had worked on the said post for more than 12 years continuously. The management did not discharge the said obligation . The workman submitted a representationto the General Manager , J. & K Area on 25-8-95 for regularizing him on the post of Tub Munshi w.e.f. 1-1-90 but it yielded no result . It is prayed that the management be directed to regularise the applicant on the post ofTub Munshi tub loader Gr. III w.e.f. 1-1-1990 and make payment of arrears of pay and allowances and all consequential benefits .

Versus

TheManager;

Jamuna 1/2 Mines of South Eastern Coalfilds Ltd. , PO Jamuna Colliery, Distt. Shahdol(MP)

Shahdol .

...Management

AWARD

Passed on this 21st day of January, 2008

1. The Government of India, Ministry ofLabour, vide its Notification No. L-22012/260/2002 - IR(CM - II ) dated 8-8-2003 has referred the following dispute for adjudication bythis tribunal :-

"Whether the demand ofShri Sadhu Ram represented through Samyukta Koyla Mazdoor Sangh (AITUC) to regularise him as clerk Grade- III/Munshi is legal and justified ? If so , to what relief he is entitled ? "

3. The case ofthe management in brief is as follows . That the workman was initially appointed as General Mazdoor, Category- I w.e. f. 26-9-89 . On the recommendation ofthe DPC, various employees including the workman Shri Sadhuram Kewat were promoted and placed to the post and category grade as indicated against their names w.e.f. 14-8-92.Accordingly office order No. 972 dated 12-10-92 was issued . The workman was promoted to the post of Trammer , Category - III and since then he is working in the said capacity . Subsequently he was re - designated as mechanical helper vide letter No. 427 dated 21-1-05 . Accroding to service record , his educational qualification isupto VIIlth standard. All the Area Personnel Manager of SECL Area were given clearcut guidlines that no fresh proposals from time rated to clerk should be entertained. The Hd. of SECL vide circular No. 380 dated 1-10-99 intimated the decision of the functional Directors ( ID ) to the CGM/GMs of all the area of SECL which is as follows:-

(i) No diversion of Manpower to Non - productive jobsand any diversion in any circumstances by CollieryManager, General Manager to be viewed as a misconduct .

(ii) No diversion of Manpower from Underground to surface . The diversion to be viewed as a misconduct.

(iii) No deployment of Time Rate Personnel on monthly rate jobs in Clerical or Surface inOffice or inSecurity jobs .

2. The case of workmen Shri Sadhuram Kewat is as follows . That he was appointed as Mazdoor General Category on 29-9-89 by the management . He was never made to work as a trammer and right from his employment , he was given various works . After about 3 months of, appointment, he was made to work as Tub Munshi w.e.f. 1-1-1990 and since then he has been continuously working asTub Munshi (Clerk Gr - III ) . The workman w.e. f. 1-1-1990 has been continuously made to work as Tub Munshi sometimes in SDL panel and sometimes in Loader panel. Whileworking in the SDL panel , he was required to write thetub book report in his own hand . There are large number oftub book reports which have been recorded by him in his ownhand and which are available with the management . Whileworking in loader panel, he has filled up Form -IV tub 763 भारत का राजपत्र: फरवरी 23, 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

NewDelhi , the 6th February, 2008

S. O. 391. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publisheds the Award (Ref. No. 146/ 2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of RotmaWest Colliery of South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. and their workmen, receivedby the Central Government on 06-02-2008.

[No. L- 22012/261 /2002 - IR(CM - II) ]

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR The ChiefGeneral Manager (P&A) of SECL.,Bilaspur vide circular dated 3-2-2000 issued to all Area Personnel Manager Area Head Quarters that if any time rated employee is deployed in clerical job directly or indirectly the same should be informed immediately to the headquarter and in case any employee's posting from underground to surface should also be inforified. As per various settlements generally known as NCWA and Cadre Scheme, the workman is not entitled to be regularised as clerkGrade- III/ Munshi as he is neither qualified nor can be regularisedto the post of Clerk Gr- III, Munshi as per circulars. It is specifically denied that the workman was working as Tub MunshiGrade- III w.e.f. 1-1-90 . He was never authorisedto work as clerk against any sanctioned vacancy. The claim of the workman is baseless .

NO. CGIT/LC/R/146/03

PresidingOfficer: Shri C. M. SINGH

4. Vide order dated 4-7-06 passed onthe ordersheet of this referencee proceeding , the feference proceeded exparte againstthe workman/Union .

ThePresident,

5. As the reference proceeded exparte against workman, there is no evidence on record on behalf of workman/Union .

...Workman/Union

Samyuktha Koyala Mazdoor Sangh (AITUC), C/o Sanjay Kumar Mishra Telephone Exchange , POKotma Colliery, Shahdol

Versus

6. The management in order to prove their case filed affidavit of their witness Shri R. K. Prusty, Sr. Personnel Officerand posted at Jamuna URGO project of J& KArea. TheManager,

7. I have heard Shri A. K. Shashi , Advocate learned counsel for themanagement and I have very carefully gone through the evidence on record.

KotmaWest Colliery of SouthEastern Coalfields Ltd. , PO Kotma, Distt . Shahdol (MP) Shahdol

...Management

AWARD

Passed on this 28th day of January, 2008

8. The case ofthe management is fully proved from the uncontroverted and unchallenged affidavit of management's witness Shri . R. K. Prusty. Therefore the reference deserves to be decided in favour of the management and against the workman/Union.

1. TheGovernment of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L-22012/261 /2002 - IR(CM - II ) dated 8-8-2003 has referred the following dispute for adjudication bythis tribunal:

9. In view ofthe above , the reference is answered in favour ofthe management and against the workman/Union without any orders as to costs hoiding that the demand of Shri Sadhu Ram represented through Samyukta Koyla Mazdoor Sangh (AITUC) to regularise him as clerk Grade- 111/Munshi is neither legal nor justified and consequently theworkman Is not entitled to any relief.

"Whether the demand of Shri Munshi S/o Basohari , Suit Operator/Tipper Helper represented through Samyukta Koyla Mazdoor Sangh (AITUC ) to regularise/promote him as a Driver is iegal and justified? If so , to what relief he is entitied ?"

10. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

2. Vide order dated 23-2-2006 passed on the ordersheet of this reference, the reference proceeded exparte against the workman/Union .

C. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 6 फरवरी , 2008

3. Neither the workman /Union nor the management filed their statement of claim .

4. I have heard Shri A. K. Shashi , Advocate the learned counsel for the management . It is a no evidence case. Therefore the reference deserves to be answered in favour ofthe management and against the workman/Union without any orders as to costs .

का. आ. 391 , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. ई. ली. एल. के प्रबधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 146/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-2-08 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

5. Inview ofthe above , the reference is answered in favour of the management and against the workman/Union without any orders as to costs holding that the demand of Shri Munshi S/o Basohari , Suit Operator/Tipper Helper [सं. एल.-22012/261/2002 - आई आर ( सी एम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी.

470 G1/08-16 764

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

Dated the 30th December, 2007 .

AWARD

represented through Samukta Koyla Mazdoor Sangh (AITUC) to regularise/promote him as a Driver is not legal and justified. Therefore the workman is not entitled to any relief.

6. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment as pér rules .

Inexercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d) ofSub- section ( 1 ) and Sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , Govt . of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter No. L- 22012/ 320/2000- IR(C - II ) dated 02-08-2001 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal .

C. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

SCHEDULE

नई दिल्ली , 6 फरवरी , 2008

"Whether the action of the management of Jambad Colliery ofM/s . ECL in dismissing Sh. Subhas Bouri , UG Loader from services vide letter dated 23-12-1997 islegal andjustified ? Ifnot, towhat reliefthe workman is entitled to ? "

का. आ. 392. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार ई. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , आसनसोल के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 25/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , ज़ो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-2-08 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.-22012/320/2000- आई आर (सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डैस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 6th February, 2008

S. O. 392. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 25/2001 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour courts , Asansol as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial disputebetween the management of ECL and thier workman , which was received by the Central Government on 06-02-2008.

2. After having received the Order No. L- 22012/320/ 2000- IR(C- 11 ) dated 02-08-2001 ofthe aforesaid reference from theGovt . of India , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute , a reference case No. 25 of 2001 wasregistered on 10-09-2001/19-11-01 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post to the parties concerned directing them to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written statement along with the relevant documents and a list ofwitnesses in support of their claims . In pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned . Sri P. K. Das , Advocate and Sri R. K. Tripathi , Chief Organising Secretary of the Union appeared in the court to represent the management and the union respectively . The written statement on behalf of both the parties were filed in support of their claims .

[No. L- 22012/320/2000- IR(C - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

3. Inbriefcompass the case ofthe union as set forth in its written statement is that Sri Subhas Bouri was permanent employee of Jambad Colliery working as an UnderGround Loader of M/s . Eastern Coalfields Limited.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL.

Present:

Sri MD. SARFARAZ KHAN , Presiding Officer.

Reference No. 25 of 2001 .

Parties:

TheAgent , Jambad Colliery of M/ s . ECL, Parasia, Burdwan.

Vrs.

The Secretary, Koyala Mazdoor Congress , Asansol , Burdwan.

Representatives:

Sri P. K. Das , Advocate .

For the management:

For the union ( Workman ) : Sri R. K. S. K. Tripathi , Chief

Organising Secretary of the

Union .

Industry:

State: West Bengal . Coal

4. The main case of the union is that Sh . Subhas Bouri absented from his duty with effect from 1-2-97 for which hewas charge sheeted. He had replied to the charge sheet and produced the medical certificate granted from S.D. Hospital , Asansol on 15-3-97 in support ofhis illness and fitness in order to resume his duty and prayed for the same. During the course of enquiry the Enquiry Officer had provisionally accepted the said medical certificate and subsequently sent the same to S.D. Hospital Authority for verification which was found to be genuine . Sri Subhas Bouri is claimed to be absent from his duty due to his sickness which was beyond his control and on the ground of relevant medical certificate the workman concerned should have been allowed to resume his duty but surprisingly enough he was not allowed to resume his duty without assigning any reason and subsequetly dismissed on 23-12-97. It is also claimed that the appointment of his P.A. as management representative by the Enquiry Officer is not just and proper as he is not supposed to be linked with the attendance of the underground loader. So he is not competent to depose that Subhas Bouri did not report 765 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23, 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

ofdismissal is totally justified and the workman concerned isnotatall entitled to get any relief what soever prayed for.

for duty after submitting his reply on 15-3-97 as he is not the reporting authority.

9. In view of the pleadings of both the parties and materials available on the record I find certain factswhich are admitted one . So before entering into the discussion of the merit ofthe case I would like to mention those facts which are directly or indirectly admitted by the parties .

5. It is also the case of the union that no second show cause notice was even served upon Subhas Bouri prior to his dismissal which is the violation of the guideline of the Hon'ble Court. The workman was kept forcefully idle for a long period without any payment of subsistence allowance which amounts to the victimization of the workman concerned . The union has sought relief for reinstatement ofthe workman concerned in his service with full back wages together with other consequential benefit.

10. It is further admitted fact that the workman concerned had submitted the explanation to the charge sheet issued against him and at the same time he had requested to the management for the resumption of his duty but he was not allowed to resume his duty.

6. On the other hand the defence case of the management in briefas per the written statement is that the instant dispute as raised by the union over the terms of reference is entirely misconceived one as there is no illegality in dismissing the ex- workman from- his service and accordingly the reference is claimed to be bad in the eye oflaw.

11. It is the admitted fact that the delinquent employee Sh . Subhash Bouri , Underground Loader was a permanent employee of Jambad Colliery of M/ s Eastern Coalfieds Limited who was charge sheeted by the management on 14-3-97 for his absence from duty w.e.f. 1-2-97.

12. It is also admitted fact that the workman concerned was absent from his duty w.e.f. 1-2-97 to 14-3- 97 i.e. about one and half month for which a charge sheet was issued to the workman concerned and the workman concerned had replied to the charge sheet for which a domestic enquiry was held in which the workman concerned guilty for the charges alleged against him.

13. It is also admitted fact that on the basis of the enquiry proceedings along with its report the workman concerned was dismissed from his service w.e. f. 26-12-97. itisfurther clear from the charge sheet that the workman concerned was charge sheeted for an unaothourized absence w.e.f.1-2-97 and there is no charge of habitual absenteeism against the delinquent employee .

7. The main defence case of the management is that the concerned workman remained absent from his duty w.e.f. 1-2-97 without taking any sanctioned leave or permission from the comptent authority which constitutes misconducts under clause 17( 1 ) of the Model Standing Orders applicable to the establishment and as such he was charge sheeted vide charge sheet No. ECL/ JC/C-6/P & IR/ 96-97 dated 13-4-96. The charge sheeted workman submitted his reply to the charge sheet but as the explanation offered by him was found to be totally unsatisfactory and as such adomestic enquiry was held into the said charge sheet by an independent Enquiry Officer . The charge sheeted workman duly participated in the enquiry proceeding in which he was given all reasonable opportunities to defend hiscase in accordance with the principles of naturaljustice .

14. It is also admitted fact that during the course of enquiryproceeding the workman concerned had produced the medical certificate granted from S.D. Hospital , Asansol on 15-3-97 in support of his illness and fitness to resume hisduty and in course of enquiry the enquiry officer sent the same to the authority of S.D. Hospital , Asansol for verification which was found to be genuine .

15. It is the settled principle of law that the facts admitted need not be proved . Since all the aforesiad facts are admitted one so I do not think proper to discuss the same in detail .

16. On perusal of the record it transpires that on 23-8-2005 hearing on the preliminary point was made . The validity and fairness of the enquiry proceeding was not challenged by the side of the union and accordingly the enquiry proceeding was held to be fair and valid and as such the date for final hearing of the reference was fixed whichwas taken up for final hearing on 25-4-2007 and after concluding the hearing the award was kept reserved for order.

8. It is also the defence case of the management that the Enquiry Officer issued due notices of enquiry to the workmen concerned and he conducted the enquiry proceeding in accordance with the principles of natural justice . The enquiry officer after concluding the enquiry proceeding submitted his findings before the appointing authority and the charges of misconduct was duly established in the report submitted by the enquiry officer. The disciplinary authority after careful consideration of the charge sheet, enquiry report along with the enquiry proceeding and other connected papers was placed to award an order of dismissal of the concerned workman from his service considering the gravity of the misconduct and punishment awarded in the instant case is quite befitting and proportionate . Besides this the allegation alleged by the union in its written statement that the statement of the management representative is false , concocted or should not be relied upon. It is also denied thatthe ex- workman was absent from duty due to his alleged sickness which was beyond his control . The management never acceptedthe sickness of the delinquent employee. The management has prayed that it be declared that order

17. In view ofthe averments made in the pleadings of the parties , facts , circumstances and other materials 766

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4, 1929

available on the record the following issues were framed onre -caste for just decision of the case.

(1) Is the reference in hand misconceived one and also bad in the eye of law and beyond the scope ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947?

the act ofthe absence of the workman from his dutyw.e.f. 1-2-97 and accordingly the workman was held guilty by the Enquiry Officer in his report about the unauthorized absence without any sanctioned leave and information to the management. Besides this the union has also not challenged the fairness and validity of the enquiry proceeding and admitted that the workman concerned was unauthorisedly absent from duty during the relevant period .

(ii) Is the charge ofmisconduct of an unauthorized absence as per the provision ofmodel standing order against the delinquent workman proved against him or not?

(iii) Is the punishment of dismissal awarded tothe workman concerned by the just, legal and proportionate to the gravity of misconduct?

Having gone through the entire pervailing facts circumstances , enquriy proceedings and the findings of the enquiry officer I find that the delinquent employee was admittedly guilty for the charges leveled against him and the enquiry officer has rightly held him guilty for the misconduct of an unauthorized absence for the relevant period continuously without any sanction leave , prior permission or information to the management for which the workman concerned deserves some suitable punishment for the alleged proven misconduct as provided inthe medel standing order. As such this issue is decided against the union.

20. Issue No. 3 : Now the only main point in issue for consideration before the court is to see as to how far the punishment awarded to the delinquent employee by the management is just , proper and proportionate to the alleged nature of the proven misconduct.

It was argued by the side of the union that it is a simple case of unauthorized absence for about one and halfmonths and the absence from duty during the relevant period is duly eplained and the reasons of absence from the duty is sickness which is relevant and satisfactory ground of absence during the relevant period.

18. Issue No. 1: This issue has been taken up first for discussion for the sake of convenience and just decision ofthe case. Themanagement has taken the plea in its written statement that the instant reference is bad in the eye of law and the facts as well as the circumstance of the case is misconceived one which do not come under the purview ofthe provision of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. But the aforesaid facts have not been happily pleaded in the written statement nor it has been mentioned to show as to how far the reference is bad in the eye of law and the same is not legally maintainable. Apart from this the record itself shows that the aforesaid issue was neither raised nor pressed by the side of the management even during the copurseoffinal hearing ofthe reference . The management side has neither examined any oral witness nor tendered even a chit ofpaper nor any legal points were placed before the court in support of its plea. As such I do not find any legal defect in the maintainability of the reference and accordingly the facts of the case very well come under the purview of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour has rightly referred the dispute to the Tribunal for adjudication and as such this issue is decided against the management.

Itwas further submitted that the workman concerned has got unblemish record during the service period and at best it is the first offence ofthe workman concerned which has been sufficiently explained and the same go to show the compelling circumstance beyond the control of the workmanconcerned. It was also argued that a simple case of unauthorized absence can not be said to be a gross misconduct and the extreme sorts of penalty can't be imposed upon the workman in such a minor case of alleged misconduct.

The management has also not charge sheeted the workman for habitual absence nor any chit of paper in this regard has been filed in the court nor there is any specific pleading in this respect as well . It was also submitted that the enquiry officer has also not mentioned that the reason of his absence was not satisfactory. The union futher submitted that the workman concerned was suffering from plural iffusion which is a serious type of disease and fatal for life . The medical sertificate of the Sub- Divisional Hospital , Asansol bears out the truth . In such a prevailing facts and circumstance one will have to be absent from his duty speciallywhen the life itself is in danger . I find much force in the argument of the unlon side and I am convinced 19. Issue No. 2: This is an important issue and is the crux ofthe reference in hand-which may decide finallythe fate ofthe case. From the perusal ofthe record it transpires that the workman concerned Subhash Bouri had absented himselffrom his duty w.e.f. 1-2-97 for which he was charge sheeted by the management vide Ref. No. BCL/JC/C- 6/ P& IR/ 96-97/ 513/361 dated 14-3-97 as per the provision of Model Standing Order under clause 17 ( 1 ) n. It is further clear from the the record that the delinquent employee appeared before the enquiry officer and duly participated in the enquiry proceeding . The workman concerned had replied the charge sheet. He had produced the medical certificate from S. D. Hospital , Asansol on 15-3-97 in support of his illness and fitness to resume his duty. The workman during his statement before the Enquiry Officer has clearly admitted that he did not obtain any leave or permission from 1-2-97 to 13-3-97 and he also did not inform the management about his absence . The management representative in this enquiry proceeding has supported 767 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

to hold that the delinquent employee was absent from his duty during the relevant period under the compelling circumstance beyond his control .

power under Section 11 (A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in order to meet the ends ofjustice . And as such the impugned order of dismissal ofthe delinquent employee is hereby set aside and he is directed to be reinstated with the continuity of service and in the light of prevailing facts circumstance and the misconduct for which the punishment ofdismissal was imposed on the workman concerned I think it appropriate that the conceened workman be imposed a punishment of stoppage of two increments without any cumulative effect . It is further directed that the workman concernced will be entitled to get only 30% of the back wages which will serve the ends ofjustice , as such his issue is decided in favour of the union and against the management . Accordingly it is hereby.

ORDERED

that let an " Award be and the sarne is passed on contest in favour of the workman concerned . Send the copies of the award to the Ministry of Labour , Govt. of India, New Delhi for information and needful . The reference isaccordingly disposed of. "

Md . SARFARAZ KHAN , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 6 फरवरी , 2008 20. Perused the provision of the certified standing orderapplicable to the establishment of the company where the extreme punishment prescribed is said to be dismissal as per the gravity of the misconduct and admittedly the misconduct ofan unauthorized absence from the duty under the compelling circumstance can not be said to be a gross misconduct rather it is a minor nature of misconduct . Besides this it has been several times clearly observed by the different Hon'ble High Courts and the Apex Court as well that before imposing a punishment of dismisssal it is necessary for the disciplinary authority to consider the socio-economic back ground of the delinquent employee, his farmily back ground, length of service put in by the employee , his past record and other surrounding cicumstance including the nature of misconduct. Those are the relevant factors which must have to be kept in mind by the authority at the time of imposing the punishment which of course has not been done by the management in thiscase in order to meet the ends ofjustice.

का. आ. 393. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. ई. सी. एल. के प्रबधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 210/1992 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-2-08 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल.- 22012/150/1992- आई आर ( सी-11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 6th February, 2008

S. O. 393. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Goverment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 210/1992) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SECL and thier workman, which was received by the Central Government on 06-02-2008 .

21. The delinquent employee is admittedly an illiterate manofBouri by caste who is the member ofthe Scheduled Casteandhappens to be the member of the weaker section ofthe society. He is no doubt financially weak and poor who has suffered a lot for about eight years and he had never been gainfully employee any where during the period of dismissal as the same has neither been pleaded nor proved by the management . It is clearly provided under clause 27 ( 1 ) (page 15) of the model standing order that various minor punishment are to be awarded to the erring employee according to the nature and gravity of the misconduct . 1 fail to think as to why only maximum punishment available under the said clause should be awarded in the prevailing facts and circumstances of the case. It has also been observed by the Apex court that justicemust be tempered with mercy and that the delinquent employee should be given an opportunity to reform himself and to be loyal and disciplinary employee of the management .

[No. L- 22012/ 150/1992- IR(C-II )] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR NO. CGIT/LC/R/210/92

PresidingOfficer: Shri C. M. Singh 22. However, I am of the considered view that the punishment of dismissal for an unauthorized absence for few months only under the compelling circumstance and without any malafide intention is notjust and proper and it is too harsh a punishment which is totally disproportionate to the alleged nature of proven misconduct . Such a simple case should have been dealt with leniently by the management specially when no second show cause notice has been served upon the concerned workman by the management which is of course a direct violation of the directives of the Apex Court, which amounts to denial of the principles of natural justice.

Workman/Union

Shir Sampat , S/ o Nandan, Ex. Tammer, C/o Shri M. L. Jain, Near Panchayat Mandir , Shahdoi (MP)

Versus

23. In view ofthe matter , I think itjust and proper to modify and substitute the punishment by exercising the 768

[ PART 11- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4, 1929

Dy . General Manager ,

....Management

Sub Area Manager , Bijuri Sub Area of SECL, PO Bijuri Colliery, Distt. Shahdol (MP)

Manager Sub Area Manager , Bijuri Sub - Area of Hasdeo Area of S. E. C. Ltd. in dismissing Shri Sampat S/ o Nandan, Trammer, Behraband Pilot Mines from services . w.e.f. 22-4-1991 is legal and justified and consequently the workman is not entitled to any relief.

AWARD

Passed on this 30th day of January, 2008

9. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Minsitry of Labour & Employment as perrules.

C. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 6 फरवरी , 2008

1. The Government of India, Ministry ofLabour vide its NotificationNo. L- 22012 / 150/92 - IR(C- II ) dated 1-10-92 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

"Whether the action of Dy. General Manager/Sub Area Manager, Bijuri Sub- Area of Hasdeo Area of S.E.C. Ltd. in dismissing Shri Sampat S /o Nandan , Trammer , Behraband Pilot Mines from services w.e.f. 22-4-1991 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to?"

का. आ. 394.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सए. ई . सी. एल. के प्रंबधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 159/1995 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-2-08 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. - 22012/45 / 1995- आई आर ( सी-11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डैस्क अधिकारी : 2. Vide order dated 21-7-05 passed on the ordersheet of this reference proceeding, the reference proceeded exparte against the workman .

New Delhi , the 6th February , 2008 3. No statement of claim has been filed on behalf of workman.

S. O. 394. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14of 1947) , the Central Government hereby published the award (Ref. No. 159/ 1995) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal Cum- LabourCourt , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SECL and thier workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 06-02-2008 .

[No. L- 22012/ 45 / 1995 - IR(C- II ) ]

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO . CGIT/LC/ R/ 59/ 95

4. The case of the management in brief is as follows . Shri Sampat, S / o Nandan Patel was working as Trammer in BPM . It was reported against him that his actual name is Shri Ram Karan (Bhola S/o Dadula Yadav), Village Pachkura . But he got employment in Bijuri Sub Area, SECL, Hasdeo Areaby impersonating himself as Shri Sampat S / o Nandan Patel , Vill . & PO Baherabandh , Distt. Shadhol . Because of the aforesaid, a chargesheet was issued to him and and as his reply to the chargesheet was found unsatisfactory . The Enquiry Officer conducted a departmental enquiry against him legally and properly . The charges were found fully proved against Shri Ramkaran who impersonated bimself as Shri Sampat . In view of seriousness of misconduct committed by him , the action of management in dismissing him from services is legal and justified and consequently he is not entitled to any relief.

Presiding Officer: SHRI C.M. SINGH

The General Secretary,

5. As the case proceeded exparte against the workman, there is no evidence on behalf of workman on record.!

National Colliery Workers Federation , Post South J.K.D. Colliery,

...Workman/Union

Distt. Surguja (MP)

Versus

6. The management in order to prove their case filed affidavit oftheir witness Shri B. K. Mishra, then working as Dy. Personnel Manager and was posted at SECL , Hasdeo Area.

The General Manager ,

Hasdeo Area of SECL ,

7. I have heard Shri A. K. Shashi , Advocate for the management . I have very carefully gone through the evidence on record.

...Management

Post South Jhagrakhand Colliery, Distt . Surguja (MP)

AWARD

Passed on this 28th day of January, 2008 8. The case of the management is fully established and proved from the uncontroverted and unchallenge affidavit of management's witness Shri B. K. Mishra . Therefore the reference is answered in favour of the management and against the workman without any orders as to costs holding that the action of the Dy. General

1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No.L-22012/45 /95-1.R. (C-II) dated 29-8-95 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :

769 भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

workmen/Union.

6. The management in order to prove their case filed affidavit oftheir witness Shri S.K. Mallick, then working as Dy. Personnel Manager , SECL, Hasdeo Area.

"Whether the demand of the General Secretary, National Colliery Workers Federation , Hasdeo Area that the pay disbursement allowance of clerks engaged in pay disbursement at Hasdeo Area should be enhanced from Rs . 18 per day to Rs . 120 per day is reasonable and justified? To what relief the workers are entitled to ? "

7. I have heard Shri A.K. Shashi , Advocate for the management and I have very carefully gone through the evidence on record .

2. Vide order dated 27-12-2006 passed on the ordersheet of this reference , the reference proceeded exparte against the workmen/Union .

8. The case of the management is fully proved from the uncontoverted and unchallenged affidavit of their witness Shri S.K.Mallick .

3. The workmen/Union have failed to file their statement of claim .

9. In view of the above , the reference is decided in favour ofthe management and against the workmen/Union without any orders as to costs holding that the demand of the General Secretary, National Colliery Workers Federation , Hasdeo Area that the pay disbursement allowance of clerks engaged in pay disbursement at Hasdeo Area should be enhanced from Rs.18 per day to Rs.120 per day is not at all reasonable and justified . Consequently the workers are not entitled to any relief.

10. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

C. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 6 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 395. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. ई. सी. एल. के प्रबधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 126/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-2-08 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल. - 22012/259/ 1997- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 6th February, 2008

S. O. 395. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947(14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 126/ 1998 ) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal - Cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SECL and thier workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 06-02-2008.

[No. L-22012/259/ 1997- IR(C- II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

4.The case ofthe management in brief is as follows . That the service conditions of the employees employed in the Coal Industry are covered by National Coal Wages Agreement (NCWA) being executed from time to time . The said NCWA carry the cadre scheme as well as Job Nomenclature. Category, job specification , nature of work etc.aregiyen in the job nomenclature . There is no category called "Pay clerks " in Coal Industry. Cadre Scheme has beenformulated from the Ministerial Staff. The Ministerial staff are classified as General Clerical Cadre, Store Personnel Cadre, Loading/dispatch personnel cadre and Cash Personnel Cadre . The clerks under the General Clerical Cadre prepare the wages of the employees . They were engaged for distribution of wages . During the period the clerks who were engaged in preparing the wages were engaged for distribution payment of wages and other payment because , there is no designation of " pay clerk" in the job nomenclature circulated by JBCCI . The clerks were distributing payment ofwages and other payment to only soine employees . Most of the employees were getting their wages through Banks . No additional work by extending additional time were taken from any ofthe employees. That the distribution of wages were also done during their working hours . The clerks engaged for distribution ofwages -did not work extra time . The management has right to take work from their employees as per mines legislation . There is no provision for payment of allowance in the National Coal Wages Agreement or any other agreement or settlement that the clerks engaged for distribution of wages would be paid extra wages/allowance. The management took work of distribution payment of their employees only during the working hours of those employees and therefore theywere not entitled to claim any extra wages or allowances for the said work. That the process of the disbursement of wages through the department were In force till the year 2000. Thereafter the entire employees are being paid through Banks . As a good justure although there was no obligatory provisions for making extra wages /allowances the management pald the amount of Rs . 18 to the employees who were givenjob of distribution of wages . As the claim made by the Union is not based on any agreement , settlement oraward , the same is not maintainable .

NO . CGIT/LC/R/ 126/98

Presiding Officer : Shri C.M.Singh

5. As the case proceeded exparte against the workmen/Union , there is no evidence on record for the 770

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4, 1929

The Secretary,

M.P.Koyla Mazdoor Sabha ( HMS ) ,

Camp: Rajnagar Colliery,

Distt. Shahdol

Workman/Union

Versus

The Sub Area Manager,

Raj Nagara RO SECL ,

PO:Rajnagar Colliery,

Management

Distt . Shahdol (MP)

AWARD

Passed on this 30th day of January , 2008 1. TheGovernment of India, Ministry ofLabour vide its Notification No.L- 22012/259/97 /IR(CM - II ) dated 15-25/6/ 1998 has referred the following dispute for adjudi- cation by this tribunal :

"Whether the action of the Colliery Manager , Rajnagar R.O.Colliery of SECL in dismissing Sh .Babanram S/o Sr. Ram , Timber Mazdoor, Rajnagar 6 AB incline from company service w.e.f. 4-3-97 is legal and justified ? Ifnot, towhat relief is the workman entitled?"

2. Vide order dated 4-7-07 passed on the ordersheet of this reference proceeding, the reference proceeded exparte against workman/Union .

3. Neither the workman/Union nor the management filed their statement of claim.

4. No evidence has been adduced on behalf of the management as well as workman/Union . Thus it is a no evidence case .

5. I have heard Shri A.K.Shashi , Advocate for the management and perused the record . The reference deserves to be answered in favour of the management and against the workman/Union without any orders as to costs.

6. Inview ofthe above , the reference is answered in favour ofthe management and against the workman/Union without any orders as to costs holding that the action of the Colliery Manager , Rajnagar R.O.Colliery of SECL in dismissing Sh Babanram S / o Sr.Ram, Timber Mazdoor, Rajnagar 6 ABincline from company service w.e. f. 4-3-97 is legal and justified and consequently the workman is not entitled to any relief.

7. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment asper rules.

C. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली , 6 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 396. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.ई.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 114/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 06-02-08 को प्राप्त हुआं था। [सं. एल-22012/72/1997- आई आर ( सी- II ) ]

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 6th February, 2008

S.O. 396. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 114/ 1998) ofthe Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SECL and their workmen , which was receivedby the Central Government on 06-02-2008.

[No. L-22012/72/ 1997- IR (C- II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUS TRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT , JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/114/98

PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRI C.M.SINGH The Secretary, MPKMS , Chirimiri Colliery, Distt . Suguja

(MP)

Workman/Union

Versus

TheGeneral Manager, Chirimiri Area of SECL, PO: Chirimiri Colliery, Distt. Surguja (MP) Management

AWARD

Passed on this 30th day of January, 2008 1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No.L-22012/72/97/IR(CM- II ) dated 11-6-98 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

"Whether the action of the management of SECL, Chirimiri Area Chirimiri , Distt. Surguja, MP is justi- fied in not considering the change in cadre for Sh .Tarun Kumar Mukherjee from ClerkGr . 11 toAc- counts Cadre although vacancy was noticed and application was made . If not, what relief the work- man concerned is entitled? "

2. The case of the workman Shri Tarun Kumar Mukherjee in brief as follows . That he as posted atGM office on 1st February , 1989 as Grade - III Clerk . From 1991 , he began applying for the change ofhis cadre from General Cadreto Accounts Cadre stating that he is a commerce graduate. In this manner, he had applied several times but the management did not pay any heed to his request whereas other juniors to him have been given Accounts cadre. In the year 1995 , the workman raised this issue in IR meeting at CGM level on 11-2-1995. In the said meeting, the 771 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

फरवरी 23, 2008 /फाल्गुन 4, 1929

भारत का राजपत्र :

अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 192/1994 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 06-02-08 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/221/1994- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 6th February, 2008 management expressed their inability mentioning that no vacancy was in existence in Accounts cadre which was actually false . Due to the above false statement ofthe man- agement, the workman has suffered a lot. It is therefore prayed that the action of the management in not changing the cadre of the workman from Clerk Gr- II to Accounts cadre is neither legal nor proper .

S.O. 397. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 192/ 1994 ofthe Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation the management ofSECL and their workmen, which was received by the CentralGovernment on 06-02-2008 .

[No. L- 22012/221 / 1994- IR(C- II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT- INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR NO . CGIT/LC/R/ 192/ 94

PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRIC.M.SINGH

The Vice President,

3. The case of the management in brief is as follows . That the change of cadre cannot be claimed as a matter of right and therefore no industrial dispute regarding the same ismaintainable. The workman was initially appointed as Grade- III Clerk in General Cadre and was posted in GM office w.e.f. 1-2-89 . The workman never worked in Accounts cadre and therefore the question of change of his cadre from General Cadre to Accounts cadre does not arise . No right of the workman exists for applying change of his cadre. The workman has made a vague statement . He has failed to submit particulars of those employees whose cad- res were changed . The employees who were working in Accounts department since long were considered and ob- served in Accounts cadre . It is specifically denied that juniors and persons who were in technical cadre as Dozer operator had been given the opportunity to avail conver- sion to accounts/ clerk cadre and debarred the workman concerned. The workman is not entitled to any reliefwhat- soever.

M.P. Koyla Shramik Sangh ( CITU) , H.O, Surakachar , PostBanki Mongra, Distt.Bilaspur Workman/Union

4. Vide order dated 4-7-07 passed on the ordersheet of this reference proceeding , the reference proceeded ex parte against the workman/Union .

Versus

5. It is a no evidence case .

6. 1 have heard Shri A.K.Shashi , Advocate for the management .

TheGeneralManager , S.E.C.L, Manikpur Colliery, Post Manikpur Colliery, Distt . Bilaspur Management

7. Since it is a no evidence case , the reference de- serves to be answered in favour of the management and against the workman without any orders as to costs .

AWARD Passed on this 25th day of January, 2008

1. TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No.L-22012(221 )/94-IR.C.II dated 4-10-94 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

8. Inview of the above , the reference is answered in favour ofthe management and against the workman/Union without any orders as to costs holding that the action of the management of SECL, Chirimiri Area Chirimiri , Distt. Surguja, MP is justified in not considering the change in cadre for Sh .Tarun Kumar Mukherjee from Clerk Gr.II to Accounts Cadre although vacancy was noticed and appli- cation was made. Consequently the workman is not en- titled toany relief.

"Whether the demand of M.P.Koyla Shramik Sangh (CITU) for effecting promotion to Shri Sheo Bachan Singh in Fitter Gr - I w.e.f. 11-11-83 (the date when juniors S/ Sh Bhag Singh & Mohd Idrish were pro- motedto Fitter Gr I is justified? If not, to what relief Shri Sheo Bachan Singh is entitled to?" 9.Let the copies of the award be sent to the Govern- ment of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

C. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली , 6 फरवरी , 2008

2. The case of workman/Union in brief is as follows . That the workman Shri Sheo Bachan Singh is the senior mostE.P.Fitter Gr.II with the management . The channel of promotion from the post of E.P. Fitter Gr . II to to E.P.Gr. 1 , the criteria is seniority -cum - suitability. The management has constituted a DPC and subsequently 2 juniors of the workman namely Shri Bhag Singh and Shri Mohd.Idrish were promoted by the order dated 17/20-3-90. The work- manhas clean and unblemished record and no ACR has का. आ. 397. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.ई.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक

470 GF/ 08-17 772

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008/PHALGUNA 4 , 1929

been ever communicated to him. Therefore , the action ofthe management in arbitrarily rejecting the claim ofthe workman for promotion is bad in law. The action of management is further illegal because the workman was not promoted on the ground ofhis legitimate trade union activities .

3. The case of the management in brief is as follows : Two resultant vacancies of E.P.Fitter Grade - I were to be filled up at Manikpur Colliery and therefore , a DPC was constituted vide order dated 24-9-1983 by the Additional ChiefMining Engineer, Manikpur to examine and recom- mend the eligible cases of Fitter Gr.II for promotion to the post of E.P. Fitter Gr. I- cum-Mechanic . The list of eligible candidates as per cadre scheme was prepared by the man- agement and it was observed that 19 employees working as E.P.FitterGr.II including Shri Sheo Bachan Singh were eligible for consideration of promotion to the next higher grade. The DPC vide letter dated 3-11-1983 invited all con- cerned employees to appear before the Selection Commit- tee on 7-11-1983 . Out of 19 employees , 7 employees did not turn up before the DPC . As per seniority, Shri Asgar Ali , Shri Dau Ram , Sl.Nos . 1 & 2 could not be promoted as they did n'tappear before the DPC and Sl Nos.3 & 4 could not be considered as they secured below qualifying marks i.e. 11 and 10.5 marks respectively. Sl. Nos . 5 & 6 i.e. Shri Mohd. Idrish and Shri Bhag Singh secured more than qualifying marks and hence these two employees after finding suit- able for job were promoted to the post of E.P.Fitter Gr.l w.e.f.11.11.1983 . Vide order dated 19/21-3-1985 , DPC was constituted for considering the case of eligible E.P. Fitter(Mechanical Gr.II ) and for promotion to the post of E.P. Fitter (Mechanical Gr . I) . A notice was issued to all eligible candidates to appear before the Selection Commit- tae/DPC on 22-3-1985 . The aforesaid committee submitted theirrecommendations . The claim of the Union for promo- tion of Shri Sheo Bachan Singh w.e.f. 11-11-1983 is not justified. The management never deprived the workman from getting his claim of promotion as EP Fitter Gr.I when he become eligible for the same . He was given promotion vide office order No. 735-46 dated 15-4-85 . The action of the management is as per procedure .

4. Vide order dated 3-8-05 passed on the ordersheet ofthis reference, the case proceeded ex parte against the workman/Union .

5.As the case proceeded ex parte against the work- man, there is no evidence on record on behalf of workman/ Union .

6.The management in order to prove their case filed affidavit of their witness Shri A.K.Jain then working.as Dy. ChiefEngineer (Excavation) posted at Eastern Coal Field Limited, S/Bazar Area.

7. 1 have heard Shri A.K.Shashi , Advocate for the management and perused the evidence on record . The case of the management is fully established from the uncontroverted and unchallenged affidavit of management's witness Shri A.K.Jain. Therefore , the refer-

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] ence deserves to be answered in favour of the manage- ment and against the workman/Union out any orders as to costs .

8. In view of the above , the reference is answered in favour ofthe management and against the workman/Union without any orders as to costs holding that the demand of M.P.Koyla Shramik Sangh ( CITU) for effecting promotion to Shri Sheo Bachan Singh in Fitter Gr- I w.e.f. 11-11-83 (the datewhenjuniors S/ Sh . Bhag Singh & Mohd Idrish were promoted to Fitter Gr. 1) is justified and consequently Shri Bachan is not entitled to any relief.

9. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Govern- ment of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment as per rules .

C. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 4 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 398.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार डब्ल्यू.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 82/1994 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 04-02-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [सं. एल-22012/65/1994- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] स्नेह लता जावस , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th February, 2008

S.O. 398. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 82/ 1994) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of WCL and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 04-02-2008 .

[No. L -22012/65/ 1994- IR (C- II) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUS TRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR NO. CGIT/LC/R/82/94

PRESIDING OFFICER: SHRI C.M.SINGH The Secretary, R.K.K.M.S , P.O.Chandametta, Distt. Chhindwara Workman/Union

Versus

Dy.C.M.E./Manager , Ambara Colliery of W.C.L , P.O Ambara, Distt. Chhindwara, Management 773 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4, 1929

AWARD

Passed on this 22nd day of January, 2008

of birth from 1-7-47 is not at all justified. It is prayed that the reference be answered by holding that the action of the management isjust and proper and the workman concerned is not entitled to any relief whatsoever .

1.TheGovernment of Iridia, Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No.L- 22012/65/94- IR(C - II ) dated nil has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal:-

4. Order -sheet dated 20-11-07 reveals that the workman did not turn up for cross examination on his affidavitand, therefore, his affidavit cannot be read in evidence.

5. Shri A.K.Shashi , Advocate for management submittedthat as the workman has not given any evidence to prove his case, therefore no evidence is required to be leadby the management and in this manner, the evidence ofthe management was closed .

"Whether the action of the management ofAmbara colliery ofWCL isjustified in not correcting the date ofbirth from 1-7-47 to 26-12-53 on the basis ofHigher Secondary School Certificate regarding Shri Shiv Kumar , Explosive Carrier of Shastry Incline , Kanhan Area, WCL , Chhindwara (MP) ? If not to whať relief the concerned workman is entitled to?"

6. As mentioned above , the workman's affidavit cannot be legally read in evidence and the management has not adduced any evidence . Thus it is a no evidence case . Therefore , the reference deserves to be decided in favour ofthe management and against the workman without any orders as to costs.

7. In view of the above , the reference is decided in favour ofthe management and against the workman without any orders as to costs holding that the action of the management ofAmbara Colliery ofWCL is justified in not correctingthe date ofbirth from 1-7-47 to 26-12-53 on the basis of Higher Secondary School Certificate regarding Shri Shiv Kumar , Explosive Carrier of Shastry Incline, Kanhan Area, WCL, Chhindwara (MP) and consequently the workman is riot entitled to any relief.

8: Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment asper rules.

C.M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 4 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 399.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार. एस.ई.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 95/1995 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 04-02-08 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-22012/532/1994- आई आर (सी-11 ) ] स्नेह लता जावस , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 4th February, 2008

2. The case of workman Shri Shiv Kumar in brief is as follows: That he entered in the services ofthe management on 25-2-1976 as explosive carrier . Since the management was a government company, there was a restriction for appointment in the company of a person who has crossed the age of25 years . The workman was aged about 24 years and his date of birth according to matriculation certificate was 26-12-1953 . At the time of entering in service, the workman produced the certificate issued by the Board of Higher Secondary Education , Bhopal according to which his date ofbirth is 26-12-1953 and the same was recorded in his service record. But later on without assigning any reason or giving any notice to the workman , his date of birth was altered as 1-4-47. The workman for the first time raised dispute regarding his date of birth with the management informing that his date of birth has been wrongly recorded and the same should be corrected as 26-12-1953 . That in accordance with circular issued on 5-2-81 , it was mandatory on the part ofthe management to review his case in terms ofcircular and also review his date ofbirth from 1-7-47 to 26-12-1953 but the management did not care for his representation . The Union also represented the matter ofthe workman on 5-8-1986 to the management informing that his date of birth is 26-12-1953 and the same becorrected according to the entries ofdate ofbirth inhis Higher Secondary School Certificate Examination marksheet but he did not get fruitful result. The workman had appeared in the Higher Secondary School Certificate Examination in 1975 and entered in services in the year 1976. He produced his date ofbirth certificate but instead of recording his correct age, the management altered his clate ofbirth as 1-7-47 which is highly illegal and is not in accordance with the JBCCI Circulars. It is, therefore, prayed by the workman that the management be directed to correct thedate ofbirth in his service record as 26-12-1953 .

S.O. 399. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 95/ 1995) ofthe Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SECL and their workmen , which was receivedby the Central Government on 4-02-2008 .

[No. L-22012/532/ 1994- IR (C- II ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer 3.The case ofthe management in brief is as follows: Inthe Form-B Register, the date of birth of the workman was entered as 1-7-47 at the time ofhisjoining the services. The entries made in Form -B Register were signed by the workman at the time of his entry into service. There is nothing to hold that the date of birth of Shri Shiv Kumar is not 1-7-47 . The claim of the workman for changing his date

470 GI/08-18 774

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/95/95

PRESIDING OFFICER : SHRI C. M. SINGH

General Secretary,

relating to the workman was pending for consideration . It is illegal and unconstitutional to turn down the medical examination result given by the Medical Board, the chairman of which is a civil surgeon . It is prayed that the medical examination report given by the District Medical Board be accepted, he be declared unfit for work and his dependent be given employment under National Coal WageAgreement .

Koyla Mazdoor Sabha (UTUC) ,

Post Dhanpuri ,

Distt. Shahdol (MP)

Worman/Union

Workman/Union

Versus

GeneralManager,

Sohagpur Area,

SouthEastern Coalfields Limited,

Post Dhanpuri , Distt. Shahdol (MP) Management

AWARD

Passed on this 7th day of January, 2008

1. The Government of India, Ministry ofLabour vide its Notification No.L - 22012/532/94- IR(C- II) dated 25-5-95 has referred the following dispute for adjudication bythis tribunal:-

"क्या प्रबंधतंत्र महाप्रबंधक , सोहागपुर क्षेत्र, साउथ इस्टर्न कोल फील्डस लिमिटेड पो. धनपुरी , जिला- शहडोल (म.प्र. ) के प्रबंधकों द्वारा श्री रामलाल वल्द ठेगई टो.नं. 2357 , पम्प खलासी, बुढ़ार खदान नं. 1 को मेडिकल बोर्ड जिला अस्पताल शहडोल द्वारा अनफिट कर दिये जाने के आधार पर सेवामुक्त न कारने एंव उसके आश्रितों को नौकरी न दिये जाने की कार्यवाही न्यायौचित है । यदि नहीं तो संबंधित कर्मकार किस अनुतौष का हकदार है । "

3.The case ofthe management in brief is as follows. The workman had been periodically examined by PME wherein he was declared medically fit for further services. He was examined by PME under the provisions of Mines Act inNovember, 1991 when he was declared fit. He was again examined by PME in the year 1992 when he was declared medically fit for further service . The workman applied for examining him by the Area Medical Board. Accordingly his case was sent to Medical Board. The Medical Board examined him and issued the medical certificate declaring him fit for duty. The workman again submitted an application for re- medical examination by Medical Board. His application was forwarded to the Medical Board by the Manager, Burhar No.1 Mine. The Dy. Chief Personnel Manager vide his letter dated 26-8-92 fowarded a copy of the application to the Chief Medical Officer , SECL headquarter Bilaspur for re-medical examination bytheAppellate Medical Board. TheAppellate MedicalBoarddeclared him fit for job . On receipt ofthe report oftheAppellate Medical Board dated 10-2-93, the workmanwas advised to report on duty on his original job immediately. The workman submitted an application requesting for declaring him unfit so as to avail the benefit of clause 9.4.3 dependent employment in his place . The workman thus wanted to get himself declared medically unfit with a view to get employment to his son. In view of the above facts and circumstances , the claim made by the workman has no merit hence llable to be rejected.

4.As the case proceeded exparte against the work- man/Union, there is no evidence on record for proving the case ofworkman/Union . The management in order to prove their case have filed affidavit of their witness Shri M.N.Prajapath, then working as Sub Area Manager , SECL , SohagpurArea.

5. I have heard Shri A.K.Shashi , Advocate for the management. I have very carefully gone through the evi- dence on record.

6. The case of the management is fully established and proved from the uncontroverted and unchallenged affidavit oftheir witness Shri M.L. Prajapath . Therefore the reference deserves to be answered in favour of the management and against the workman/Union without any orders as to costs .

7. In view of the above, the reference is decided in favour ofthe management and against the workman/Union without any orders as to costs holding the following :

2.The case ofthe workman in brief is as follows . The workman Shri Ramlal was employed as underground Pump Khalasi T.No.2451 at Burhar Colliery No.1 . He was ap- pointed in the said colliery in the year 1973. Due to working inthe collierymines for a long period of time, the workman suffered fromTuberculosis. The workman moved an appli- cation that he may be examined by the Medical Board as he was suffering from the aforesaid disease . The management directed that the workman be examined by the Medical Board. TheMedical Board after examining certified him fit fordutybecause according to National Coal WageAgree- ment, ifan employee is declared unfit by the Medical Board, it is obligatory on the management to give employment to his dependent . The workman moved application to the Chairman , District Medical Board Shahdol with the prayer that he has been suffering from Tuberculosis and he may be examined by the Medical Board. As a result thereof, he wasexaminedby the Medical Board and the Medical Board deciared him unfit for doing the job . The management did not accept themedical examination report of the workman. On 1-7-95, the workman was retired from services though themanagement had fuli knowledge that industrial dispute

小 775 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23, 2008/फाल्गुन 4,1929

has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

" क्या प्रबंधतंत्र महाप्रबंधक , सोहागपुर क्षेत्र , साउथ इस्टर्न कोल फील्डस लिमिटेड पो. धनपुरी , जिला- शहडोल ( म.प्र. ) के प्रबंधकों द्वारा श्री रामलाल वल्द ठेगई टो.नं. 2357 , पम्प खलासी, बुढ़ार खदान नं. 1 को मेडिकल बोर्ड जिला अस्पताल शहडोल द्वारा अनफिट कर दिये जाने के आधार पर सेवामुक्त न करने एवं उसके आश्रितों को नौकरी न दिये जाने की कार्यवाही न्यायौचित है । अतः संबंधित कर्मकार किसी अनुतोष का हकदार नहीं हैं । "

"Whether the action ofthe Manager , Nandan Colliery No.1 of WCL Kanhan Area, PO Nandan , Distt . Chhindwara (MP) is justified in dismissing from the services to Shri Padam S/o Nokhey, Ex-tub Loader, T.No. 1168 of Nandan Coal Mine No.1 of WCL, Kanhan Area w.e.f. 8-6-90 on the basis of enquiry conducted without giving him an opportunity to re- formisjustified? Ifnot , to what reliefthe concerned workman is entitled to? "

8. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Govern- ment of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

C. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली, 4 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 400.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार डब्ल्यू.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 17/1992 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-2-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/371/1991 - आई आर ( सी- II ) ]

स्नेह लता जवासु , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 4th February, 2008

S.O. 400.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. 17/1992) of the Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of WCL and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 4-2-2008 .

[No. L-22012/371 / 1991 - IR(C- II) ]

SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

2. The case of workman Shri Padam in brief is as follows . That he was working with Nandan CollieryMine No.1 of WCL on the post of tub loader. He is an illiterate person and has no knowledge of the provisions of the standing orders . That while he was working in Nandan Colliery No.1 , he suddenly received a message from his uncle/relative that he is very serious and is admitted inthe hospital . That the workman informed the Mines Manager and after submitting Casual Leave application, proceeded to see his uncle at Betul . After reaching Betul on 17-12-1989 , he fell ill and was under treatment at Govern- ment Main Hospital Betul w.e.f. 17-12-1989 and was con- tinuouslyunder the treatment upto 4-3-90 . He was declared fitby theDoctor on 4-3-90 . When he reached for resuming his duties, he was not allowed to join . During the period of illness , he was served with a chargesheet dated 28-1-90 informing that he was absent unauthorisedly w.e.f. 1-1-90 to 28-1-90. Being an illiterate person and being from tribal community and backward class , he could not reply the charge sheet . A departmental enquiry was conducted against him . But the said enquiry and dismissal order passed is highly illegal and is liable to be set-aside . The enquiry took place in his absence as during the period of enquiry, he was under treatment at Betul . It is prayed that the action ofthe management of Nandan Colliery No. 1 of WCL in dismissing the services of workman Shri Padam' w.e.f. 8-6-90 be held unjustified and illegal and he be reinstated with full back wages and all other consequen- tial benefits .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO.CGIT/LC/R/ 17/92

Presiding Officer : SHRI C. M. SINGH

TheAsstt. Secretary, R.K.K.M.S( INTUC) , Workman/

Union

F.O. Chandametța, Distt. Chhindwara

Versus

TheGeneralManager,

W.C.L, Kanhan Area, P.O. Dungaria,

Distt. Chhindwara

Management

AWARD

Passed on this 21 st day of January, 2008

1.TheGovernment of India, Ministry ofLabour vide its Notification No.L- 22012/371/91 -IR(C- II) dated 15-1-92

3. The case of the management in brief is as follows. That theworkman was n habitual absentee . He remained absent from duty unauthorisedly without intimation, permission and sanctioned leave on various occasions . He had n very poor attendance record for the last several years . The coal Mine workers are given various facilities such as free electricity, free water, supply, free accommodation , free medical facilities, to the employees and their family members . For this, dispensary atcollierylevelandnCentral Hospital at Barkui generally known asBarkui Hospital are functioning. The entire expenditure is borneby the company. Ifan employee fell ill, he has to report tothecollieryhospital from where Sickness Certificate is issued. The employee is granted sick leave till he is declared fit for dutybytheMedical Officer ofthe company. The workman neitherapplied for leave nor any intimation was given to the 776

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4 , 1929

Dispute between the employers in relation to the managment of SECL and their workman, which was received bythe Central Government on 4-2-2008.

[No. L- 22012/38/ 1996- IR(C- II ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

management for he reported sick to the colliery doctor . A departmental enquiry was legally and properly conducted against the workman for his remaining absent from duty unauthorisely. The charges were fully proved against the workman and therefore, he was dismissed from services w.e.f. 18-6-90. The punishment awarded to the workman is justandproper and proportionate to the act of his miscon- duct.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/ R/79/97

14. Videsorder dated 28-6-05 passed on the ordersheet ofthis reference proceeding, the case proceeded exparte against the wokman .

5. There is no evidence on record on behalf of the workman,

Presiding Officer : Shri C. M. Singh ThePresident, M.P. Koyla Shramik Sabha ( CITU ), Chirimiri Area,

Post: Kurasia Colliery,

Workman/Union

Distt. Surguja ( MP)

6. The management in order to prove their case filed affidavit of Shri Parimal Mavawala, then working as Manager in Nandan Mine No. 1 , WCL, Kanhan Area.

Versus

ChiefGeneral Manager , Chirimiri Area of SECL,

7. I have heard Shri A.K.Shashi , Advocate for the management I have very carefully gone through the evidence on record .

PostWest Chirimiri,

Management

Distt . Surguja ( MP)

AWARD

Passed on this 25th day of January, 2008

8. The case of the management is fully proved from the uncontroverted and unchallenged affidavit of management's witness Shri Parimal Mavawala. Therefore the reference deserves to be decided in favour of the man- agement and against the workman .

1. TheGovernment of India, Ministry ofLabour vide its Notification No. L- 22012/38/96-1R(C- II ) dated 10-3-97 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal :-

"Whether the action of the management of Chirimiri Area of SECL in not providing employment to the dependent of late Sh. Srawan Kumar , Casual Worker , NorthChirimiri Colliery who expired on 9-2-83 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the dependent of Sh . Srawan Kumar is entitled ?"

9. In view of the above, the reference is decided in favour ofthe management and against the workman without any orders as to costs holding that the action of the Manager, Nandan Colliery No. 1 ofWCL Kanhan Area, PO Nandan, Distt . Chhindwara (MP) in dismissing the services ofShri Padam S/o Nokhey, Ex-tub Loader, T.No. 1168 of Nandan Coal Mine No.1 of WCL , Kanhan Area w.e.f. 8-6-90 on the basis of enquiry conducted without giving him anopportunity to reform is justified and consequently the workman is not entitled to any relief.

10. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

2. Inspite ofsufficient service ofnotice on workman/ Union, no body put in appearance for workman/Union . Theworkman/Union also failed to file statement of claim . Therefore vide order dated 13-5-2004 , the case, proceeded exparte against workman/Union.

C.M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 4 फरवरी , 2008 का. आ. 401. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की बारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. ई. सी. एल. के प्रंबधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 79/1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-2-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/38/ 1996- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डैस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 4th February, 2008

S. O. 401.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 79/1997) ofCentral Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial

3. The management has filed their Written Statement. The case ofthe management in brief is as follows : That the President, M.P.Koyla Shramik Sabha (CITU) has no locus- tandi to raise the dispute in favour of dependent of late Sh. Srawan Kumar . Sh . Srawan Kumar was engaged in the month ofMarch 1982 as casual mazdoor . He was engaged on as and when required basis . The Union has raised the claim for providing compassionate appointment to Sh. Jagdish who is said to be the younger brother of late Sh . Srawan Kumar . Late Sh . Srawan Kumar was unauthorisely travelling on truck No. MPL- 7504 on 28-1-1983 which was going towards Garghella Incline of NorthChirimiri Colliery at about 7.15 A.M. He fell down from the truck as a result ofwhich he died on 9-2-83 . On the date of accident , he was not on duty . The case of compassionate appointment to the dependent of Late Sh . Srawan Kumar could not be considered as late Sh . Srawan Kumar was a casual employee . He had no dependent as [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

per definition of the dependent. Hence one Sh . Jagdish who is said to be dependent of the deceased Late Sh . Srawan Kumar was not entitled to compassionate appointment. The claimant is not entitled to any reliefwhat- so- ever .

4. As the case proceeded ex -parte against the workman/Union , no evidence is on record on behalf of workman/Union.

5. The management in order to prove their case has filed affidavit oftheir witness Shri N.R. Das , then working as Personnel Manager in DumanHill .

6. I have heard Shri A.K.Shashi , Advocate , leamed counsel for the management and perused the evidence on record.

7. The case of the management is fully established from the uncontroverted and unchallenged affidavit oftheir witness Shri N.R. Das .

8. Inview ofthe above , the reference deserves to be decided in favour of the management and against the workman/Union without any orders as to costs . Therefore the reference is answered in favour of the management and against the workman/Union without any orders as to costs holding that the action of the management Chirimiri Area of SECL in not providing employment to the dependent of late Sh . Srawan Kumar, Casual Worker, North Chirimiri Colliery who expired on 9-2-83 is legal and justified. Consequently the dependent of Sh. Srawan Kumar is not entitled to any relief.

9. Let the coples of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

C. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 4 फरवरी , 2008 का. आ. 402,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , सं. II नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 30/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को4-2-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -22012/133 /2005 - आई आर ( सी- II ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डैस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 4th February, 2008

S. O. 402. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Giovernment hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 30/2005) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, No. II , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Food Corporation of Indla and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on4-2-2008 .

[No. L-22012/ 133/2005 - IR(C- II) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer 470 G1/ 08-19

777

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4 , 1929

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVT. INDUTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT- II, NEW DELHI

ID. No. 30/2005 PresidingOfficer: R. N. Rai .

-Claimant

PRESENT : Sh . W. R. Khan

Sh . Om Prakash -Respondent IntheMatter of:-

Shri Siya Ram Paswan & Ors . Vill& P.O. Kalyanpur , Dakshin Tola, Via: Dalsingsarai ,

-Claimants Distt: Samastipur (Bihar) .

Versus

TheManaging Director , Food Corporation of India, 16-20, Barakhamba Lane , NewDelhi.

-Respondent

AWARD

TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 22012/ 133/ 2005 - IR(C - II ) Central Government Dt . 13-04-2005 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder:

"Whether the action of the management of FCI in not allowing FCI Departmental Workers of Ports ( list enclosed) to exercise option to come over to the PensionScheme as given to the Port and Dock Workers byMinistry of Surface Transport is legal and justified? If not, towhat relief they are entitled ? "

Theworkman- applicants have filed claim. In the claim statement it has been stated that the Food Corporation of India is a statutory body and established by the Food Corporations Act , 1964. The FCl was mainly set up for storage and distribution of food- grains throughout the country. The Corporation is the single largest public sector undertaking dealing with the procurement , storage and distribution of food-grains . There are approximate 1700 depots all over the country. In all the depots the workers are discharging various functions like loading, unloading offood -grains of wagons/ trucks , stacking, de - stacking and re- stacking of food grains bags , delivery and weighment , physical verification , standardization , filling ofGunny bags with loose grains , salvaging of damaged food grains , cieaning/ sweeping, re -packing etc.

That the FCI employs workers at various Port and Dock in the country for the purpose of loading , unloading , stacking, de- stacking, bagging, handling etc. offood -grains from and to ships in ports and dock-yards .

Thatthe above said Industrial Dispute existing between the management of FCI and their departmental Port Workers in relation toexercising the option to come over to the pension scheme has been referred to this Hon'ble Tribunal by the CentralGovemment following the order of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in WP No.4604/2002 wherein the Hon'ble 778

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4 , 1929

option to switch over to the pension scheme .

High Court of Delhi granted liberty to the petitioners/ workmen to approach Industrial Tribunal for adjudication.

That the claimants are CPF beneficiaries (whose names are listed at Annexure - 1 ) , who were port workers of FCI and who have been denied the benefit to exercise option to switch over to pension scheme whereas the rest of the CPF beneficiaries , Port and Dock Workers retired after 01-01-1986 were given the aforesaid option of the pension scheme .

The management has filed written statement . In the written statement it has been stated that the Food Corporation of India was handling import and export work offood grains and import of fertilizer in the major ports on behalf ofGovernment of India . Due to cessation of import and export work of food grains and withdrawal of import work of fertilizer from FCI in the year 1986 a Voluntary Retirement Scheme was introduced with the approval of Government of India for dispensation of FCI labour working in the major ports . The port workers were given their normal terminal benefit apart from the special compensation under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme as full and final settlement .

That the management of FCI on 14-11-1970 signed Memorandum of Settlement under section 12 (3 ) of the ID Act, 1947 with FCI Workers ' Union before ALC (C) , Calcutta and agreed to give the same benefits to the FCI Workers who worked at Ports , as are available to the Port and Dock Workers .Accordingly the FCI gave benefits to its workers onthe pattern prevalent in the Dock Labour Board, Calcutta.

That on 30-08-1986 the workers (claimants Annexure 1) working at Calcutta Port for FCI exercised their Retirement Scheme, 1986 .

That on 20-07-1990 the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of FCI Workers ' Union Vs. FCI & Ors . in WP( C) No. 222 of 1984 ordered that the wages of the employees of FCI shall be equal to the wages of the labourers employed atCalcutta Port on the ground that the departmental Food Corporation of India's labours at Calcutta Port City Godown and FCI Depot in West Bengal are at par with the Port and Dock labourers and have been give revision in their wage structure from time to time whenever such revision has been made for Port and Dock workers .

That FCI Port labours were governed by FCI ( CPF) Scheme framed under Employees Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act. The inembers of the CPF Scheme of FCI are not entitled to the Pensionary benefits at par with the Government employees . The members of the CPF Scheme recruited on or before 01-04-1971 were eligible for Family Pension Scheme, 1971 on optional basis . Apart from this they were eligible for FCI Group Insurance Scheme, 1980 framed with the permission of the authority under Employees Provident Fund Act as replacement to the Employees Deposit Linked Insurance Scheme , 1976 . Under this Scheme the legal heirs of the members who die in harness get insured amount. Whereas in case of optces for the Family Pension Scheme the legal heirs were eligible for pension if the member die in harness subject to fulfillment of certain conditions . It is subrnitted that the workers who retired under Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme were not members of F. P.S. , 1971 .

That on 27-08-1996 the Hon ble High Court of Judicature at Chennai (Madras ) ordered that the workers ofClass - III & IV at the Ports are entitled to claim inclusion of interim relief actually given to them between the period 01-01-1986 and 31-12-1987 for all the purposes including pensionary benefits .

That the Ministry of Surface Transport, Government of India vide their letter No.A -38011/23 /94 -PF - 1 dated 20-12-1996 circulated to the Chairmen of all Port Trusts and all Dock Boards to give option to CPF retirees of Port Trust and Dock labour after 01-01-1986 to come over to the pension scheme.

The Union in the instant case as relied upon the orders of the Government of India applicable to the employees ofthe Port Trust and Dock Labour Board which were not applicable in case of FCI Port Labour . Therefore, there was no question for seeking option from the FCI Port Labour who had retired after full and final settlement of their final dues for the extension of pensionary benefit at par with the Government employees . The similarly placed PortLabour of FCI raised an industrial dispute on this subject . The matter was adjudicatedby the CGIT , Vishakhapatnam and the demand of the worker was rejected. It was held that departmental worker of FCI that there is no parity in the nature of work being performed by the FCI erstwhile Port Labour and the employees of the PortTrust Dock Labour Board.

That on 11-02-1997 the government decided that CPF beneficiaries who were in service on 01-01-1986 but have since retired and in whose case retirement benefits have to be calculated under the pension scheme shall be entitled to exercise the option of pension scheme provided they refund 8.33% of CPF amount and interest thereon drawn bythem at the time of settlement of CPF amount and interest thereon drawn by them at the time of settlement of CPF account. Such option shall be exercised by 31-03-1997 .

That on 28-07-1998 , the Hon ' ble High Court of Judicature at Calcutta allowed the case ofthe writ petitioner who could not exercise his option to come over to the pension scheme on or before the cut off date and directed the respondent to allow the writ petitioner to exercise the

Thatthe retirees of FCI Port Labour have also taken up the matter with Government of India though various forums for extension of penstonary benefit to them at par with Class III & IV employees of the Port Trust. The Ministry has specifically rejected their case . The copies of the relevant orders and reply given by the FC1 in this regard have been filed herewith .

779 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4,1929

That thejudgment dated 28th July , 1998 annexed as Annexure - VIII applicable to the Kolkata Trust Class III & IV employees only. The FCI Port Labour retired under Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme cannot avail the benefit ofthe said judgment.

That the management has been fastened with unnecessary litigation . It is submitted that if the benefit for pension as claimed herein is extended those retired workers then the same will create huge financial loss and liability apart from the administrative difficulty. The management vide its letter dated 11-10-2001 addressed to the counsel of the workman rejected the request of the workman to switch over to the pension scheme .

Theworkmen applicants have filed rejoinder . In the rejoinder they have reiterated the averments of their claim statement and have denied most of the paras of the written statement . The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement .

Thatthe workmen are not eligible and entitled for the benefit to exercise option to switch over to pension scheme as claimed by the workmen .

Evidence of both the parties has been taken .

Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record .

Itwas submitted from the side of the workmen that they were Port Workers of FCI . They have been denied the benefit of exercising option to switch over to pension scheme whereas the rest of the CPF pensionary , Port and Dock Workers retired after 01-01-1986 were given the aforesaid option of pension scheme.

That the agreement dated 14-11-1970 relates to induction of labourers in the depots of FCI . In the said agreement there was no commitment to extend parity in the pensionary benefits with that of Port Labour as claimedby the workmenherein . The agreement dated 14-11-1970 relates to the FCI Departmental Labour working in Inland Godowns. The FCI Port Labour retired under Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme was not covered in the said settlement . Moreover, in the said settlement it was agreed that benefit of annual leave and holidays will be adopted , as applicable to Dock Labour Board, Kolkata. There was no commitment for adoption of pensionary benefits .

Itwas further submitted that the management of FCI on 14-11-1970 signed memorandum of settlement and agreed to give all the benefits to the FCI workers who worked at Ports as are available to the Port and Dock workers.

The Counsel for the workmen placed reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in FCI Workers ' Union Vs. FCI & Anr . in WP ( C ) No. 202/1994 and the judgment of the Hon'ble Madres High Court dated 27-08-1996 .

Itwas further submitted that the Ministry of Surface Transport , Government of India vide order dated 20-12-1996 permitted the CPF retirees to switch over to the pernsion scheme. The workmen retired on 01-01-1986 and they are entitledto exercise the option of pension scheme provided by the Ministry of Surface Transport .

That thejudgment annexed as Annexure - IV related to parity in the wages of departmental labour of FCI working in Bihar , Assam , Orissa , North- West , Uttar Pradesh and Delhi with the departmental labour working in FCI depots in Kolkata. The said judgment has been implemented in toto . The FCI as per the said judgment is not under any legal obligation to extend pensionary benefits to the erstwhile FCI Port Labour, as claimed by the petitioner as the labour of FCI is not comparable with the labour of Port Trust as these labourers are governed with different set of Rules as applicable in Port Trust . The Supreme Court judgment dated 20th July , 1990 was not applicable to FCI Port Labour at Kolkata who retired in the year 1986. It was applicable only to the departmental labour working in the depots of FCI as mentioned herein . The terms and conditions of the employees of Port Trust and Dock Labour Boards and FCI Port Labour were distinct . Therefore , there is no justification to claim the parity in the case of pensionary benefits . The workmen are different and distinct class so far the workmen benefited in the case of pensionary benefits are concerned .

It was submitted from the side of management that due to cessation of import and export work of food grains andwithdrawal of import work of fertilizer from FCI in the year 1986 a Voluntary Retirement Scheme was introduced with the approval of the Government of India for dispensation of FCI labour working in the major ports . The port workers were given their normal terminal benefit apart from the special compensation under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme as full and final settlement .

It was further submitted that FCI Port labours were governed by FCI ( CPF ) Scheme framed under Employees Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act . The members of the CPF Scheme of FCI are not entitled to the Pensionary benefits at par with the Government employees .

That thejudgment of Hon 'ble High Court of Madras related to Class - III & IV employees and workers of major Ports who retired/ expired/resigned during the period from 1-1-1986 to 31-12-1987 . Moreover , in this judgment the Hon'ble High Court has disallowed the demand for treating the interim relief as pay for the purpose of calculation of pensionary and other benefits for Class - III & IV employees . In this judgment the eligibility to exercise option for pensionary benefits has not been determined.

This judgment is not applicable in case of FCI Port labour who retired under Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme in the year 1986 onwards .

Itwas further submitted that the members of the CPF Scheme recruited on or before 01-04-1971 were eligible for Family Pension Scheme , 1971 on optional basis . Apart from this they were eligible for FCI Group Insurance Scheme , 1980 framed with the permission of the authority under Employees Provident Fund Act as replacement to the 780

THE GAZETTE OF IND : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4, 1929

[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

workers perform more hazardous work of lifting foodgrains from the hatch ofthe Ship with the help of Carnes . They handle these articles on the wharf of the Port .

Employees Deposits Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976. Under this Scheme the legal heirs of the members who die in harness get insured amount. Whereas in case of optecs for the Family Pension Scheme the legal heirs were eligible for pension ifthe member die in harness subject to fulfilment of certain conditions . It is submitted that the workers who retired under Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme were not members of F.P.S. , 1971 .

According to the admission of WWI , the duties of the Port and Dock workers and those of FCI workers are quite different and distinct . The duties of Port and Dock workers is more hazardous and arduous in comparison to the duties of the FCI workers in the warehouses . The Port and Dock workers have to lift the bags to the Cranes and to unload iffrom the Ship . They work on the wharf ofthe Port.

WW1 , Sh. Sukhdev Sahani has further admitted in hiscross-examination as udner :-

It was further submitted that there was no question for seeking option from the FCI Port Labour who had retired after full and final settlement of their final dues for the extension ofpensionary benefit at par with the Government emoloyees.

"We used to carry gunny bags of cereals and foodgrains only . It is correct that workers of Port Trust and Dock workers are used to carry and fit hazardous materials and heavy container from Ship to Yard . "

This statement of the witness establsihes the fact that the workmen of FCI carry the bags of cereals and foodgrains whereas the workmen of Trust and Dock Board carried hazardous materials and heavy container from Ship to Yard , In view ofthis different nature of work , the workmen of FCI are not entitled to get the benefits of workmen of PortTrust and Dock Board .

WW1 , Sh . Sukhdev Sahani has further admitted as under:--

" It is correct that FCF Labour were governed by FCI CPF Scheme framed under the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provident Fund . " The workmen seek the right of exercising of option to come over to the pension scheme as was given to the Port and Dock Workers by the Ministry of Surface Transport. The Ministry of Surface Transport has given this option to the workmen in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Chennai High Court . The workmen are not the employees of the Ministry of Surface Transport and the work performed by the workmen is not similar to the work performed by the workers of Port and Dock workers of the Ministry ofSurface Transport. The judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court is not applicable in the instant case . The judgment relates to parity in the wages of departmental labourers of FCI working in Bihar , Assam, Orissa , North East, Uttar Pradesh and Delhi with the departmental labourers working in FC1 depots in Calcutta . There is no mention in the judgment that the workmen are entitled to all the benefits available to the Port and Dock Workers .

Theworkmen have admitted that they were governed by FCI CPF Scheme and so , there is no question ofextension of any pensionary benefits to the workmen .

The witness has further admitted as under :-

The Port and Dock workers and the labourers ofthe Dock Labour Board are governed by different set of Rules and their terms and conditions are governed by the statutory authorities under the supervision and control of Ministry of Surface Transport.

" It is correct that I opted and accepted the Voluntary Retirement Scheme introduced by the FCI management and my name appears at Serial No. 2 at Annexure -3 filed by me along with statement of claim."

The substantial question is whether the duties performed by the FCI workers and those of Port and Dock labourers are similar in nature.

"WW1 , Sh . Sukhdev Sahani has admitted in his cross- examination as under :--

" It is correct that the workmen of Port Trust Dock Labour Board has separate and distinct working settlement from what the workman of FCI has . "

These workmen have filled up the applications for the enrolment under FCI ( CPF Regulation , 1967). This regulation has been framed under the provisions of Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The benefits of CPF accumulation admissible to these workmen were given to these workmen as full and final settlement and acceptance of their voluntary option for the retirement . This fact is supported by the statement oftheworkman, Sh . Sukhdev Sahani (WW1 ) .

Mr. Sahani , WWI has also admitted in his cross- examination as under :--

" It is correct we got the entire pay and admissible payments by cheque under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme dated 30-08-1986 to our satisfaction . " WWI has categorically admitted that the working conditions and work performance of Port and Dock Labourers and FCI workers are not similar in nature . The Port and Dock workers load and unload gunny bags and other articles on Crane Platform and Crane carries the item to the Ship . The Dock workers handle either bulk or Bag Cargo on the hatch of the Ship and they lift foodgrains from the hatch of the Ship with the help of Crane . The FCI workers load and unload the foodgrains bags from and to trucks and wagons and the warehouses . The duties of loading and unloading performed by the FCI workers is limited to the warehouses whereas the Port and Dock

The workmen got themselves enrolled under FCI (CPF Regulation, 1967) and they have received all the benefits under the regulation by which they are governed.

781

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4 , 1929

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

It is quite obvious from perusal of the record that there is no statutory pensionary scheme for the workmen when they joined the services of FCI .

out from the side of the workmen as to what other scheme was available to them . The workmen have voluntarily accepted the Voluntary Retirement Scheme in the year 1986 and they have raised this dispute in 2005 after a lapse of almost 19-20 years . Their claim is delayed and it is not maintainable in view of the extraordinary delay. Delay defeats equity.

Thejudgment of the Hon'ble Chennai High Court is regarding Port and Dock workers . The benefits given by the Hon'ble Chennai High Court to the Port and Dock workers cannot be extended by any stretch of imagaination to the workers of FCI as the duties performed by the Port and Dock workers are more hazardous and it relates to loading and unloading gunny bags on the Cranes and from Cranes to the Ships .

It was submitted from the side of the management that there is no explanation of delay. Not to speak of plausible or satisfactory explanation . There is no explanation at all what prevented the workman to approach thisForum after along a period of 19-20 years . It is settled law that stale claim made after an inordinate and unexplained period could not be entertained .

My attention was drawn to 2005 ( 5) SCC page 91 paras 12 and 13. The Hon'ble Apex Court has held that long delay impedes the maintainance ofthe records . Belated claim should not be considered .

Ithas been held in (2001 ) 6 SCC 222 as under :-

From the above discussion it becomes quite obvious that the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court referred to above is not applicable in the case of the FCI workmen as in that judgment the Hon'ble Supreme Court directed for parity ofwages to the workers of FCI working in different Regions . There is no mention of the duties of that Port and Dock labourers The workmen cannot avail the benefits of thejudgment of the Hon'ble Chennai High Court as their work is not so hazardous as the work performed by the workers ofPort and Dock workers . There is no mention of extending the benefits of Port and Dock workers to the FCI workers even in the settlement dated 14-11-1970 .

The instant workmen are not entitled to the benefits ofPort andDock labourers even in view of the agreement dated 14-11-1970 .

"Law does not prescribe any time limit for the appropriateGovernment to exercise its powers under Section 10 ofthe Act. It is not that this power can be exercised at any point of time and to revive matters which had since been setled . Power is to be exercised reasonably and in a rational manner. There appears to us, to be no rational basis on which the Central Government has exercised powers in this case after a lapse of about seven years of the order dismissing the respondent from service . "

In the instant case reference has been made after a delay of long 19-20 years . Limitation Act is not applicable in ID cases but stale cases should not be considered . Delay in the instant case is inordinate and relief can be rejected on the ground of delay alone .

In the settlement dated 14-11-1970 it has been specially mentioned in Paras -4 and 5 that the workmen will be entitled to only leave and holidays under the scheme of Dock Labour Board Calcutta. They are entitled to the fringe benefits at the pattern prevalent in Dock Labour Board, Calcutta. In the entire agreement there is no mention that all the statutory benefits given to the Port and Dock workers will also be extended to the workmen of the FCI . The settlement is restricted only to fringe benefits and benefits of annual leave and holidays . There is no mention that pensionary benefits will also be available to the FCIworkers .

This settlement does not confer on the workmen any benefit other than leave, holidays and fringe benefits, so it cannot be said that the workmen are entitled to pensionary scheme in view of the settlement dated 14-11-1970 .

The workmen have been enrolled under the CPF Scheme and the entire payments have been made to them along with compensation . They have worked for almost only 16 years . In the Government PSU's or even in the GovernmentDepartment, the pensionary benefit is available at least after 20 years of continuous service before superannuation as per the statutory scheme . There is no statutory scheme for these workmen in the FCI . No benefits can be extended without any statutory provisions . The Tribunal/Court cannot create statutory benefits by their orders.

The workman in his cross - examination at page -2 has admitted that the agreement dated 14-11-1970 relating to the FCI Department labourers working in Inland Godowns is not applicable to the workmen who opted under the VoluntaryRetirement Scheme of 1986 .

The workmen opted for Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 1986 in view of cessation of import and export work of foodgrains and withdrawal of import work of fertilizer from FCI in the year 1986.

Inview of the clear cut admission of this workman the agreementdated 14-11-1970 does not confer any benefit to the workmen who opted under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 1986.

The work which the workmen performed ceased to exist in 1986. Import and Export of foodgrains and import of fertilizerwas withdrawan from the FCI in the year 1986. The FCI introduced the scheme of 1986 in order to give special compensation to the workmen who served the department for almost 16 years and the workmen opted for that scheme Itbecomes quite obvious from perusal ofthe scheme dated 30-8-1986 that the workmen have accepted the Voluntary Retirement as per the FCI Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 1986 and the workmen have obtained all the benefits under this scheme . It has not been pointed 782

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4, 1929

and they received the entire emoluments . There is no statutory pension scheme in the FCI even at present . The workmen were enrolled under the CPF Scheme . The FCI haspid their CPF deposits and compensation in view of cessation of import and export work . The option of the Voluntary Retirement Scheme , 1986 has been exercised by all the workmen willingly . They have admitted it in their claim statement and WWI has also confirmed it that they opted for the scheme voluntarily and they accepted the compensation and CPF amount willingly.

It is beyond my comprehension as to under what circumstances the union has raised this dispute after a long gap of 19-20 years . The dispute itself is frivolous , vexatious and unnecessary. The workmen are not entitled to get pensionary benefits admissible to the Port and Dock workers as they belong to a different category of workmen in the FCI . There is no such departmental scheme in the FCI . They are not entitled to any relief.

The workmen have raised this unnecessary dispute after a lapse of almost 19-20 years. They are not entitled to get pensionary benefits admissible to the Port and Dock workers in view of the above discussion .

The reference is replied thus :-

The action ofthe management of FCI in not allowing FCI Departmental Workers of Ports ( list enclosed) to exercise option to come over to the Pension Scheme as given to the Port and Dock Workers by Ministry of Surface Transport is legal and justified . The workmen applicants are not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

The award is given accordingly.

Date : 28-01-2008.

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 18 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 403. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप धारा-3 धारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 मार्च, 2008 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम , के अध्याय -4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध बिहार के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्ः-

बिहटा

राजस्व ग्राम का नाम

क्र. सं.

राजस्व थाना संख्या जिला

बिहटा 1. खेदलपुरा

बिहटा

2. सिंकदरपुर

बिहटा 3. महादेवपुर , फुलाड़ी

बिहटा 12.

बिगोकुलपुर , ( कोरहर )

बिहटा 5.

देवकुली

[सं. एस-38013/11/08 - एस.एस. - 1 ]

एस. दो. जेवियर , अवर सचिव

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] New Delhi , the 18th February , 2008

S. O. 403. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees' State Insurrance Act , 1948 ( 34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st March , 2008 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter- Vand VI ( except Sub- Section ( I ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) ofthe said Act shall into force in the following areas inthe State ofBihar namely: --

Bihta

S. No. Name of the

Revenue Thana District Number

Revenue Village

Bihta Khedalpura

Bihta Sikandarpur

Bihta Mahadeopur, Phularhi

Bihta Bigokulpur (Korahar )

5. Deokuli

Bihta

[No. S-38013/ 11 /2008- S.S. - I ]

S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 18 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 404.-कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 34) की धारा -1 की उप धारा-3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 मार्च , 2008 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम , के अध्याय-4 (44व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध बिहार के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्ः-

बरौनी बेगुसराय सहित

क्र. सं.

राजस्व थाना संख्या जिला राजस्व ग्राम का नाम

379,382

रजौड़ा

बेगुसराय 2.

380,482

हाजीपुर

बेगुसराय सोकहरा

383

बेगुसराय 4.

472

असुरारी

बेगुसराय 5.

486

गढ़हरा

बेगुसराय 6.

487,491

सलेमपुरवाड़ी

बेगुसराय 7.

488,489,492 बेगुसराय मोहम्मदपुरवारो

सिमरिया

500,501

बेगुसराय

503

9. मल्हीपुर

बेगुसराय बीहट

504

10.

बेगुसराय मालती

505

11.

बेगुसराय पपरौर

507

बेगुसराय

508

13. हवासपुर

बेगुसराय

510

14. सिंगदाहा

बेगुसराय 15.

523,539

मोसादपुर

बेगुसराय 783

भारत का राजपत्र : फरवरी 23 , 2008/फाल्गुन 4,1929

[ भाग 11-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राजस्व थाना संख्या जिला क्र. सं. राजस्व ग्राम का नाम

525

16.

बेगुसराय खुटोन

526

17. तेलर

बेगुसराय

527

18.

बेगुसराय फतेहपुर

528

चकअजीज

19.

बेगुसराय 20.

529

बेगुसराय सैदपुर

21 . देउना

533

बेगुसराय

534

22.

बेगुसराय माकोपुर

23. देवना

535

बेगुसराय जेमरा

24.

536

बेगुसराय

537

25. नूरपुर

बेगुसराय 26.

540

चकबल्ली

बेगुसराय 27.

541

बेगुसराय विशनपुरचांद

28.

महना

542

बेगुसराय 29.

543, 544, 547 बेगुसराय नारायणपुर

30.

545

जमालपुर

बेगुसराय

548

31. भयौर

बेगुसराय सबौरा

550

32.

बेगुसराय मिल्की

33.

551

बेगुसराय 34.

552

गोविंदपुर

बेगुसराय

553

35.

रूपसपुर

बेगुसरा

556

36. अल्मोचक

बेगुसराय केशावे

37.

557

बेगुसराय 38. सिसवा

558

बेगुसराय 39. मकरदही

559

बेगुसराय 40.

219

रजौड़ा

बेगुसराय

220

41. हरदिया

बेगुसराय 42.

342

मिर्जापुर वनद्वार

बेगुसराय 43. चकगोपाल

345

बेगुसराय

346

44. पोखरिया

बेगुसराय 45.

348

मोकिमपुर

बेगुसराय 46.

356

बाघा

बेगुसराय 47.

357

आनंदपुर

बेगुसराय 48.

377

मोहम्मद रघुनाथ

बेगुसराय

380

49. इर्रख

बेगुसराय भीरगंज

383

50.

बेगुसराय नौरंगा

384

51.

बेगुसराय बांध वैरव

52.

385

बेगुसराय

387

53.

बेगुसराय भोहम्मदपुर रघुनाथ , हर्रख

54.

388

मियांचंद

बेगुसराय

390

55.

हरवा

बेगुसराय 27.

हेमरा

400

56.

बेगुसराय

412

उलाव

57.

बेगुसराय 29.

जिला क्र. सं. राजस्व ग्राम का नाम राजस्व थाना संख्या

419

58.

बेगुसराय सलखु तेघड़ा

503

59. मोहनएघ

बेगुसराय

519

60. वइदरपुर

बेगुसराय 61.

520

शाहपुर

बेगुसराय

[संख्या एस-38013/13/08 -एस.एस. - 1 ]

एस. दो. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 18th February, 2008 S. O. 404. In exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurrance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st march, 2008 as the date on which theprovisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter- Vand VI (except Sub- Section ( 1) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Bihar namely :-

Barauni Including Begusarai

District S. No.

Revenue Thana Number

Name of the Revenue Village

379,382 Begusarai Rajaura

380,482 Begusarai Hajipur

383

3. Sokhara

Begusarai 4. Asurari

472

Begusarai

486

Gadhhara

Begusarai 6.

487,491 Begusarai SalempurBarhi

7. Mohammadpurvaro 488,489,492 Begusarai 8. Simaria

500,501 Begusarai

503

Begusarai Mallihpur

10.

504

Beehat

Begusarai

505

11 . Malati

Begusarai

507

12.

Begusarai Papraur

13.

508

Hawaspur

Begusarai

510

14. Sikandaha

Begusarai 15.

523,539

Mosadpur

Begusarai

525

16. Khutone

Begusarai

526

17. Telar

Begusarai 18.

527

Fatehpur

Begusarai

528

19. Chakaziz

Begusarai

529

20. Saidpur

Begusarai

533

21. Deuna

Begusarai

534

22. Makopur

Begusarai

535

23. Deva

Begusarai

536

24. Jemara

Begusarai

537

25. Noorpur

Begusarai

540-

26. Chakballi

Begusarai

541

Bisanpur Chand

Begusarai 28. Mahana

542

Begusarai

543,544,547 Begusarai Narayanpur 784

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : FEBRUARY 23 , 2008 /PHALGUNA 4 , 1929

District S. No.

Revenue Thana Number

Name ofthe Revenue Village

545

30.

Begusarai Jamalpur

548

31.

Begusarai Bhayour

550

32. Saboura

Begusarai

551

33. Milki

Begusarai

552

34.

Begusarai Govindpur

553

35.

Begusarai Rupaspur

556

36.

Begusarai Almochak

557

37.

Begusarai Keshave

558

38. Sisva

Begusarai

559

Makadahi

39.

Begusarai 5.

219

40.

Begusarai Rajaura

220

41. Hardia

Begusarai

342

42.

Begusarai Mirzapur Vandwar

345

43.

Begusarai Chakgopal

346

44. Pokharia

Begusarai

348

45.

Begusarai Mokimpur

356

46.

Begusarai Bagha

357

47.

Begusarai Anandpur

48. Mohammad Raghunath 377

Begusarai

380

49.

Begusarai Irrakh

383

50.

Begusarai Meergunj

384

51.

Begusarai Nauranga

385

52. Bandh Bhairava

Begusarai 53. Mohammad Raghunath

387

Harrakh

Begusarai

388

54. Mianchand

Begusarai Irva

390

55.

Begusarai

400

56. Hemra

Begusarai

412

57. Ulad

Begusarai

419

Begusarai 58. Salkhu Teghara

503

59.

Begusarai Mohanaigha

519

Begusarai 60. Vaidarpur

520

61 .

Begusarai Shahpur

[No. S-38013 /13/2008 -S.S. - I ]

S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 18 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 405. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 34 ) की धारा -1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्‌द्वारा 01 मार्च , 2008 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम , के

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय-5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध बिहार के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्ः-

कहलगाँव

जिला

राजस्व थाना संख्या क्र. सं. राजस्व ग्राम का नाम

पाकरतला

भागलपुर

221

भागलपुर मथुरापुर

251

भागलपुर 3. सलेमपुर

267

भागलपुर काजीपुर

271

भागलपुर सरबदीपुर

298

भागलपुर कुशापुर

304

भागलपुर लक्ष्मीपुर, बनियाकचारी

336

जंगलगोपाली

भागलपुर

[संख्या एस -38013/12/08 - एस.एस. - 1 ] एस. दो. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 18th February, 2008

S. O. 405. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurrance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st March , 2008 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter- Vand VI ( except Sub-Section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into. force) ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Bihar namely : ----

Kahalgaon

District

Revenue Thana Number

S. No. Name of the Revenue Village

1. Pakartala

Bhagalpur

221

Bhagalpur 2. Mathurapur

251

Bhagalpur 3. Salempur

267

Bhagalpur kajipur

271

Bhagalpur 5. Sarbadipur

298

Bhagalpur Kushapur

Bhagalpur Laxmipur, Baniyakachari 304

336

Bhagalpur 8. Jangalgopali

[No. S-38013/ 12/2008 - S.S. - I ] S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

Printedby the Manager , Govt. of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 .