This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्री.सं. डी. एल. ( एन ) 04/ 0007 / 2003-05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003-05 भारत काराजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 15)

No. 15]

नई दिल्ली , अप्रैल 6 अप्रैल 12 , 2008 , शनिवार/चैत्र 17 चैत्र 23 , 1930 NEW DELHI, APRIL 6-APRIL 12, 2008 , SATURDAY/CHAITRA 17-CHAITRA 23, 1930

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part In order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग 11- खण्ड 3-उप-खण्ड ( ii) PART H-Section 3 Sub- section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों (( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं StatutoryOrders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than theMinistry of Defence)

कार्मिक , लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय (कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 24 मार्च , 2008

का. आ. 787.- केंद्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उप- धारः (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए निम्नलिखित अधिवक्ताओं को असम राज्य, गुवाहाटी में विचारण न्यायालयों में दिल्ली विशेष 'पुलिस स्थापना ( के.अ. ब्यूरो ) द्वारा सस्थित और उन्हें केंद्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो द्वारा सौंपे गए मामलों के अभियोजन और विधि द्वारा स्थापित पुनरीक्षण अथवा अपील न्यायालयों में इन मामलों से उदभूत अपीलों/ पुनरीक्षणों अथवा अन्य विषयों का संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती हैं:-

सर्वश्री

1. ए.सी. बुरगोहैन ,

2. श्रीमती डेजी बुरुआ गोगोई ,

3. सुश्री गौरी सिन्हा।

[सं. 225/27/2006- ए. वी. डी. ।॥ ]

चंद्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव 1188 GI /2008

(1605)

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department ofPersonnel and Training) New Delhi , the 24th March, 2008

S.O. 787.-In exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section (8 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974), the Central Govemment herebyappoints the following Advocates as Special Public Prosecutor for conducting prosecution of cases instituted bythe Delhi Special Police Establishment (CBI) in the State ofAssam at Guwahati as entrusted to them by the Central Bureau of Investigation in the trial Courts and appeal/ revisions or other matter arising out of these cases in revisional or appellate courts established by law : / S/Shri

1. A.C. Buragohain ,

2. Smt. Daisy Baruah Gogoi ,

3. Ms. Gauri Sinha,

[No. 225/27/2006-AVD- II] CHANDRA PRAKASH , Under Secy.

1606

[PART 11- SHC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

वित्त मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 27 मार्च , 2008

(राजस्व विभाग )

केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क , पुणे- के आयुक्त का कार्यालय

पुणे, 3 मार्च, 2008

संख्या 01/2008 - केंदीय उत्पाद शुल्क ( नॉन टैरिफ ) का. आ. 788, -केंद्रीय सरकार एतद्‌द्वारा दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 ( 1974का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मुंबई की अधिवक्ता श्रीमती नीलिमा एस. कस्तूरे को मुंबई में प्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम, 1988 के अन्तर्गत नियुक्त विशेष न्यायाधीश के न्यायालय में दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना ( कॅ.अ. ब्यूरो ) द्वारा संस्थित मामलों के संचालन के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है:-

[सं. 225/39/2005- ए, वी. डी.-II ]

चंद्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 27th March, 2008

का. आ. 790.- भारत सरकार, वित्त मंत्रालय, राजस्व विभाग , नई दिल्ली द्वारा दिनांक 01-07-1994 को जारी अधिसूचना संख्या 33/94-सी. शु. ( नॉन टैरिफ ) को दिनांक 25-10-2004 को जारी अधिसूचना संख्या 122/2004-सी. शु. ( नॉन टैरिफ ) द्वारा संशोधित करते हुए मुझे प्रदत्त अधिकारों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैं , श्रीमती आई. डी. मजुमदर , आयुक्त , केंद्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क पुणे -1 आयुक्तालय , पुणे , एत‌द्वारा महाराष्ट्र राज्य में पुणे जिले के, तालुका मुलशी के गांव ' घाकड ' को, ' शतप्रतिशत निर्यातलक्ष्यी यूनिटसॉफ्टवेअर टेक्नॉलॉजी पार्क यूनिट ' स्थापन करने के लिए सीमा शुल्क अधि नियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 52 ) की धारा 9 के अधीन वेअरहाउसिंग स्टेशन घोषित कर रही हूँ ।

[फा. सं. वि जी एन. ( 19 ) 25/ एसटीपी /2008 ] श्रीमती आई.डी. मजुमदर, आयुक्त S.O. 788. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 8) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974 ), the Central Government hereby appoints Mrs. Nilima S. Kasture, Advocate, Mumbai as Special Public Procecutor for conducting prosecution in cases instituted by Delhi Special Police Establishment (CBI) in the Court of Special Judge appointed under prevention ofCorruption Act, 1988 at Mumbai.

MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department ofRevenue)

[No. 225/39/2005-AVD- II ] CHANDRA PRAKASH , UnderSecy.

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE- L

शुद्धिपत्र नई दिल्ली, 28 मार्च , 2008

Pune, the 3rd March , 2008 No.01/2008. C.E. (NT)

A का.आ.789.- इस विभाग की अधिसूचना सख्यां 228/47/2007- एवीडी- दिनांक 6 नवंबर, 2007 के हिंदी रूपांतरपा के आंशिक आशोधन में 7वीं पंक्ति में " के साथ पठित " शब्दों के बाद और 8 वीं पंक्ति में " की धारा 4 " से पहले " आवश्यक वस्तु अधिनियम 1955 ( 1955 के अधिनियम सं. 10 ) " हटा दिया जाए और इसके स्थापन पर " विस्फोटक पदार्थ अधिनियम , 1908 ( 1908 का अधिनियम सं. 6 ) " लिखा जाए ।

[सं. 228/47/2007- ए वी. डी.-11]

चंद्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव

S.O. 790.- In exercise of the powers conferred on me by the Notification No. 33/ 94 - CUS ( NT ) dated 01-07-1994 as amended by Notification No. 122/2004-Cus (NT) dated25-10-2004 of the Government of India , Ministry ofFinance, Department ofRevenue New Delhi , I, Sml . L.D. Majumder Commissioner of Central Excise , Pune- 1 Commissionerate , Pune , hereby declare Village ; Wakad, Taluka: Mulshi, Dist . Pune in the Sate of Maharashtra to be Warehousing Station under Section 9 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962 ) for setting up of 100% Export Oriented Uni/STP unit.

CORRIGENDUM

[F. No. VGN ( 19) 25/STP/2008 ] Smt . 1. D. MAJUMDER, Commissioner, NewDelhi, the 28th March, 2008

कार्यालय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त जयपुर, 18 मार्च, 2008 सं. 18/2007-08

S.O. 789. In partial modification ofEnglish version ofthis Department notification No. 228 /47 /2007-AVD-II dated 6th November , 2007 the words , " Essential Commodities Act , 1955 (Act No. 10 of 1955) " occurring in the 11th line after the words " Sec. 4 of " and in the 12th line before the words " and Section 10 & 13 " , be omitted and in its place the following words shall be substituted "Explosive Substances Act , 1908 (Act No. 6 of 1908 ) " .

[No. 228/47/2007-AVD- [ [ ]

CHANDRA PRAKASH, Under Secy.

का आ. 791, -आयकर अधिनियम, 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 की 43 वां) की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 सी ) की उप- धारा ( vi ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शाक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त , जयपुर एतद्द्वारा निर्धारण वर्ष 2006-07 एवं आगे के लिए कथित धारा के उद्देश्य से " आल इन्डिया सोसायटी फॉर एडवांस एजुकेशन एण्ड रिसर्च, अलवर " कोस्वीकृति देते हैं । 1607

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

बशर्ते कि समिति आयकर नियम , 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 के उपखण्ड (23 सी) की उपधारा ( vi ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप कार्य करे ।

Provided that the Society conforms to and complies with the provisions of Sub-clause (vi ) of clause (23C) of Section 10 ofthe Income- tax Act, 1961 read with rule2CA ofthe Income-tax Rules, 1962.

[क्रमांक: मु.आ.आ./अ.आ. आ. ( समन्दय ) /जय. / 10/ (23 सी ) ( vi )/2007-08/76211

[No. CCIT/JPR/Addl . CIT( Coord .)/ 10( 23C)( vi)/ 2007-08/7766] एस. सी. कपिल , मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

S. C. KAPIL, Chief Commissioner of Income-tax जयपुर , 31 मार्च, 2008 सं. 21 /2007-08

Jaipur, the 18th March , 2008

No. 18/2007-08

का.आ. 793, - आयकर नियम , 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 की 43 वां ) की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 सी ) की उप - धारा (vi ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शाक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, जयपुर एतद्‌द्वारा निर्धारण वर्ष 2007-08 एवं आगे के लिए कथित धारा के उद्देश्य से " अरूण शान्ति एजुकेशन ट्रस्ट, जयपुर " को स्वीकृति देते हैं । S.O. 791. In exercise of the powers conferredby sub-clause ( vi ) ofClause (23C ) of Section 10 of the Income taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) read with rule 2CA of the larme- tax Rules, 1962, the Chief Commissioner of Income - tax . Jaipur hereby approves " All India Society for Advance Education & Research , Alwar " for the purpose of the said Section for the A.Y. 2006-07 and onwards.

बशर्ते कि समिति आयकर नियम, 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 के उपखण्ड (23 सौ) की उपधारा ( vi ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप कार्य करे । Provided that the Society conforms to and complies with the provisions of sub - clause (vi ) of Clause (23C ) of Section 10 ofthe Income- tax Act, 1961 read with rule 2CA ofthe Income- tax Rules 1962 .

[No. CCIT/ JPR/Addl . CIT( Coord .) / 10(23C)(vi )/ 2007-08/7621 ]

[क्रमांक: मु.आ.आ./अ.आ.आ. ( समन्वय ) /जय. / 10/ (23 सी ) ( vi ) 2007-08/7763 ] एस. सी. कपिल , मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त 5. C. KAPIL, Chief Commissioner of Income-tax

Jaipur, the 31st March , 2008 No. 21 /2007-08

जयपुर , 31 मार्च, 2008 सं. 22/2007-08

S.O. 793.In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-clause ( vi ) of Clause ( 23C ) of Section 10 ofthe Income- tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) read with rule 2CA of the Income- tax Rules , 1962 , the Chief Commissioner of Income- tax , Jaipur hereby approves " Arun Shanti Education Trust, Jaipur" for the purpose of the said Section for the A.Y. 2007-08 and onwards.

का.आ. 792 , -आयकर नियम , 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 की 43वां ) की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23सी ) की उपधारा ( vi ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शाक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त , जयपुर एतद्‌द्वारा निर्धारण वर्ष 2006-07 एवं आगे के लिए कथित धारा के उ‌द्देश्य से " श्री भवानी निकेतन शिक्षा समिति , जयपुर" को स्वीकृत्ति देते हैं ।

Provided that the Society conforms to and complies with the provisions of Sub - clause (vi ) of clause ( 23C ) of Section 10 ofthe Income - tax Act, 1961 read with rule 2CA ofthe Income-tax Rules , 1962.

बशर्ते कि समिति आयकर नियम 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 के उपखण्ड (23 सी ) की उपधारा ( vi ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप कार्य करे ।

[क्रमांक: मु.आ.आ./अ.आ.आ. ( समन्वय ) /जय. /10/ (23 सी) ( vi ) 2007-08 /7766 ]

एस. सी. कपिल , मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त

[No. CCIT/ JPR/Addl.C [ T ( Coord. )/ 10( 23C)( vi ) 2007-08/ 77631 S. C. KAPII. , Chief Commissioner of Income - tax जयपुर , 4 अप्रैल , 2008 सं. 01/2008-09

Jaipur, the 31st March , 2008

No. 22/2007-08

का.आ. 794, -आयकर अधिनियम , १५0,2 के नियम 2 सीए कं साथ प्रठनीय आयंकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 की 43㎡ ) की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 सी ) की उप- धारा ( vi ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शाक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त , जयपुर एत‌द्वद्भरा निर्धारण वर्ष 2007-08 एवं आगे के लिए कथित धारा उद्देश्य से "चाचान एंजुकेशनल एण्ड वेलफेयर सोसायटी , त्रिकानी , अलवर " कोस्वीकृति देते हैं ।

Б.О. 792. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - Section ( vi ) of Clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income-taxAct , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) read with rule 2CA of the Income-tax Rules . 1962, the Chief Commissioner of Income- tax , Jaipur hereby approves "Shri Bhawani Niketan Shiksha Sariti , Jaipur " for the purpose of the said Section for the Α.Υ. 2006-07 and onwards .

1608

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

[PART 11- SEC. 3 (ji ))

परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

बशर्ते कि समिति आयकर नियम, 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 को धारा 10 के उपखण्ड (23 सी ) की उपधारा ( vi ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप कार्य करे ।

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन :-

[क्रमांक: मु.आ.आ. /अ.आ.आ. ( समन्वय ) /जय / 10/ (23 सी) (vi) 2008-09/85 ]

(क) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ (iii) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

एस. सी. कपिल , मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त Jaipur, the 4th April , 2008

(ख) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

No. 01 /2008-09

(ग ) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एंव प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा :

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्यकलाप करना बंद कर देगाः अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्यकलाप को जायज नहीं पाया जायेगा; अथवा S.O. 794. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-clause (vi ) ofClause (23C ) ofSection 10 ofthe Income- taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) read with rule 2CA of the Income- tax Rules , 1962, the Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Jaipur hereby approves "Chachan Educational & Welfare Society, Chikani, Alwar " for the purpose ofthe said Section for theA.Y. 2007-08 & onwards.

(ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5 घ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) कं खंड( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा । Provided that the Society conforms to and complies with the provisions of Sub- clause (vi ) of clause (23C) of Section 10 ofthe Income -tax Act , 1961 readwithrule 2CA ofthe Income-tax Rules , 1962 .

[अधिसूचना सं. 38/2008/फा सं. 203/142/2007/आक. नि -11 ] सुरेन्द्र पाल , अवर सचिव [No. CCIT/ JPR/Addl . CIT( Coord.) 10(230) (vi)/ 2008-09/85]

(Central Board of Direct Taxes) NewDelhi , the 14th March , 2008

S. C. KAPIL, Chief Commissioner ofIncome-tax (केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड ) नई दिल्ली , 14 मार्च, 2008

S.O. 795. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Amala Cancer Resaerch Centre, Thrissur (Kerala ) , has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (said Act) read with rules SC and SD of the Income-tax Rules , 1962(saidRules) with effect from 1-4-2006 in the category of 'Scientific research association ' subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(i) The sole objective of the approved ' scientific research association ' shall be to undertake scientific research;

का.आ. 795,-सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 (उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग 5घ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 (उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंद ( ii) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2006 से संगठन आमला कैंसर रिसर्च सेंटर, त्रिसूर ( केरल ) को निम्नलिखित शतों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगी ' वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है, अर्थातः-

(ii) The approved organization shall carry on the scientific research activity by itself;

( i ) अनुमोदित " वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ " का एक मात्र उद्देश्य वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करना होगा;

(ii) अनुमोदित संगठन स्वयं वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान कार्य-कलाप जारी रखेगा;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain books ofaccounts and get such books audited by an accountant as definedin the explanation to sub- section (2) of section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income -tax or the Director of Income - tax having jurisdition over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 139 ofthe said Act ;

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations recieved and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certifiedby the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above .

(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन बही-खाता जारी रखेंगा तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उपधारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखांकार द्वाराः विधिवत सत्यापित एंव हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2. The central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization: -

(iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा [ भाग ।।-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

1609

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12 , 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

(a) fails to maintain books of account referred to in sub -paragraph (iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(ग ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ (iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एंव प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अधवा

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph (iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जायेगा; अथवा (c) fails to furnish its statement ofdonations received and amounts applied for scientific research referred to in sub -paragraph (iv) of paragraph 1 ; or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine ; or

(ड. ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5 ङ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नही करेगा ।

[ अधिसूचना सं. 37/2008/फा. सं. 203/ 144/2007/आ.क.नि.- II] सुरेन्द्र पाल , अवर सचिव (e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions ofclause ( ii ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 35 of the said Act read with rules SC and SD ofthe said Rules .

[Notification No. 38 /2008 /F . No. 203 / 142/2007 /ITA- 11 ]

New Delhi , the 14th March , 2008 SURENDER PAL , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 14 मार्च , 2008

S.O. 796. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Indraprastha Cancer Societyand Resaerch Centre, New Delhi has been approved by the Central Govemment for the purpose ofclause (ii ) ofsub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ( said Act,) read with rules SC and 5E ofthe Income-tax Rules, 1962 ( said Rules) with effect from 1-4-2005 in the category of other Institution partly engaged in research activites subject to the following conditions, namely:--

(i ) The sums paid to the aproved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;

का.आ. 796.- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एत‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयंकर नियमावली, 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5 ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खखंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2005 से संगठन इन्द्रप्रस्थ कैंसर सोसाइटी एंड रिसर्च सेंटर , नई दिल्ली कोनिम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगो 'अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है, नामतः -

(ii ) The approved organization shall carry out the scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students ;

( i) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा ;

(ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामाकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा;

( iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of account in respect of the sums recived by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub-section (2) of section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income -tax or the Director of Income- tax having jurisdiction over the case, by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 139 of the said Act;

( iii) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता- बही रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उपधारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एंव हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement dulycertifiedbythe auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above.

( iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत्त करेगा ।

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization:-

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन :-

(a) fails to maintain separate books of account referred to in sub- paragraph (iii) of paragraph 1 ; or

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii) ofparagraph 1 ; or

( क) पैराग्राफ के उप -पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित पृथक लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(ख) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नही करेगा; अथवा

(c) fails to furnish its statement of donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub- paragraph ( iv ) of paragraph t ; or [PART 11-SEC . 3( i) ) 1610

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008 /CHAITRA 23 , 1930

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine , or

(ड. ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5 ङ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खखंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 36/2008/फा. सं. 203/70/2007/आ.क.नि. - 11 ] (e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause (ii) ofsub-section ( 1 ) ofsection 35 of the saidAct read with rules SC and SE of the said Rules .

सुरेन्द्र पाल, अवर सचिव [Notification No: 37/2008 /F. No.203/144/2007/ITA- [1 ]

New Delhi , the 14th March , 2008

SURENDER PAL , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 14 मार्च , 2008

$.O. 797-It is hereby notified for general information that the organization National Institute of Advanced Studies , Bangalore has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of sub- section I of Section 35 of the Income -tax Act, 1961 ( said Act) read with rules 5C and SE of the Income-tax Rules , 1962(said Rules) with effect from 1-4-2007 in the category of ' other Institution ' partly engaged in research activites subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(i) The sums paid to te approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;

का.आ. 797,-सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एत‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2007 से संगठन नेशनल इंस्टीयूट आफ एडवांस्ड स्टडीज , बंगलौर को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आशिंक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगी, 'अन्य सांख्या' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , नामतः-

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out the scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

( ⅰ ) अनुयोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

(ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा;

( iii ) The approved organization shall maintain separate books ofaccount in rspect of the sums recivedby it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub -section (2 ) of section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income- tax or the Director of Income- tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 139 of the said Act;

( iii) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता -बही रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उपधारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एंव हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ।.

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations recieved and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above .

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approvat if the approved organization:-

(iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण . की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

(a) fails to maintain separate books of account referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or 2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन :-

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph (iii ) ofparagraph 1; or

(क ) पैराग्राफ के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित पृथक लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(c) fails to furnish its statement of donations received and sums applied for scientific research-referred to in sub paragraph (iv ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or (ग ) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एंव प्रयुक्त दान राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause (ii ) of sub -section ( 1 ) of section 35 of the saidAct , read with rules SC and SE ofthe said Rules .

[Notification No. 36/2008/F , No. 203/70/2007/ITA- [ 1 ]

SURENDER PAL, Under Secy.

(घ ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जायेगा; अथवा 1611

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12 , 2008 /चैत्र 23 , 1930

[ भाग 11 खण्ड (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 14 मार्च, 2008

New Delhi, the 14th March , 2008

S.O. 798. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Herbicure HealthcareBio- Herbal Research Foundation, Kolkata has been approved bythe Central Government for the purpose of clause (ji ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income-tax Act , 1961 (saidAct) , read with Rules 5C and SE of the Income-tax Rules,1962 (said Rules ), with effect from 1-4-2007 in the category of Other Institution' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely:-

का.आ. 798. सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एत‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग और 5ड. के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक1-4-2007 से संगठन हर्नीक्योर हेल्थकेयर बायो- हर्बल रिसर्च फाउंडेशन, कोलकाता कोनिम्नलिखित शतोंके अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगी ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , नामतः-

(3) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;.

(i) अनमुोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

(ii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books ofaccounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section (2) of Section 288 ofthe said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioneг of Income - tax or the Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 139 of the said Ac1;

(iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता बही रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उपधारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकर से अपनी खाता -बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

( iv ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate stateinent of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization:.

2 केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(a) failsto maintain separate books ofaccounts referred to in sub -paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 or ( क ) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित पृथक लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii ) ofparagraph 1 ; or ( ख ) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा ; अथवा

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub -paragraph ( iv ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or ( ग) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions ofclause ( ii ) ofsub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 ofthe said Act read with rules 5C and SE ofthe said Rules .

[Notification No. 35/2008/F.No.203 / 135 /2007 /ATA- IIJ

SURENDER PAL, Under Secy.

(ड. ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम ६ ग और 5 ड. के साथ पठित्त उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा।

नई दिल्ली , 17 मार्च , 2008 [अधिसूचना सं. 35/2008/फा.सं. 203/ 135/2007/आ.क.नि- II ]

का.आ. 799.-सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एत‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर

सुरेन्द्र पाल, अवर सचिव

1612

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008 / CHAITRA 23 , 1930

नियमावली, 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम ऽग और उङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2001 से संगठन साईटेक सेंटर , मुम्बई को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगी ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , नाप्रत:-

(i ) अनमुोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग - वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

(iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता बही रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उपधारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकर से अपनी खाता- बहीं की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

( iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्ययुत लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित्त विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन चापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(क) पैराग्राफ के उप -पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित पृथक लेखा यही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(ख) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा (ग) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा (इ. ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5 ड. के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड (ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 42/2008 /फा.सं. 203 /21 /2004/आ.क.नि- II ]

सुरेन्द्र पाल , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 17th March, 2008

S.O. 799. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Scitech Centre , Mumbai has been approved by the Central Government for the

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] purpose ofclause ( ii ) ofsub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 ofthe Income- taxAcı , 1961 ( said Act) , read with Rules SC and 5E ofthe Income-tax Rules , 1962 ( said Rules), with effect from 1-4-2001 in the category of other Institution " , parily engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely: ...

(i) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research:

( ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students :

(ii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books ofaccounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub - section ( 2) ofSection 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income -tax or the Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 139 of the said Act;

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above.

3. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization:

(a) fails to maintain separate books ofaccounts referred 10 in sub -paragraph (iii) of paragraph 1 ; or (b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph (iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sunis applied for scientific research referred to in sub - paragraph ( iv) of paragraph 1 ; or (d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or (e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions ofclause ( ii ) of sub- section ( 1 ) ofSection 35 of the said Act read with rules SC and SE ofthe saidRules.

[Notification No. 42/2008 /F.No.203/21 /2004/ITA - II ]

SURENDER PAL, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 17 मार्च , 2008

का.आ. 800.-सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमवाली ) के नियम 57 और 5ड. के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2004 से संगठन डॉ. प्रशान्त बनर्जी होम्योपौथिक रिसर्च फाउंडेशन, कोलकाता [ भाग 11-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

1613

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 12 , 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

category of' other Institution ' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely:

को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से संलग्न 'अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थात्:-

(1) The sums paid to the approved organization shall beutilized for scientific research;

(i ) अनमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

( ) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

(ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसांधन करेगा;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books ofaccounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research, reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub-section (2) ofsection 288 ofthe saidAct and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income-tax or the Director of Income - tax having jurisdiction over the case,by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 139 of the said Act;

(iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता यही रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान कार्य करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि को दर्शाएगा तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकर से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधि वत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shali accompany the report of audit referred to above .

( iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्यकुत लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2 The Central Government shall withdraw the approval ifthe approved organization:

2 केन्द्र सरकार यहे अनुमोदन वपिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub- paragraph (iii) ofparagraph 1 ; or (क) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित पृथक लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(b) fails to fumish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph (iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(ख) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in subparagraph ( iv ) of paragraph 1 ; or ( ग) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना बिवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or (घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा ; अथवा

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause (ii) ofsub-section ( 1 ) ofsection 35 ofthe said Act read with rules SC and SE ofthe saidRules.

[Notification No.41 /2008/F.No.203/32/2007ATA- II ] SURENDER PAL, Under Secy.

(८.) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5ग और 5ड. के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रवाधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

नई दिल्ली , 17 मार्च, 2008

[अधिसूचना सं. 41 /2008/फा.सं. 203/32/2007/आ.क.नि- ][ ] सुरेन्द्र पाल , अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 17th March , 2008

S.O. 800. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Dr. Prasanta Banerji Homeopathic Resarch Foundation , Kolkata , has been approved by the Central Govemment for the purpose of clause ( ii) ofsub -section ( 1 ) of section 35 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (saidAct), read with Rules SC and SE of the Incor tax Rules, 1962 ( said Rules), with effect from 1-4-2004 in the

का. आ. 801. सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतदुद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमषाली ) के नियम ऽग और ऽद, के साथ पतित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की बारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2005 से संगठन श्री वेंकटेश्वरा इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ मेडिकल साइसेंस , तिरूपति, आंध्र प्रदेश को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगी ' विश्वविद्यालय' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , नाम्पत:-

1188 G1/08--2 1614

[PART I SEC.3 ( i) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;

(i ) अनमुोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

(i ).अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books ofaccounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research, get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanationto sub -section (2 ) of section 288 ofthe said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income-tax or the Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case, by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub -section ( 1 ) of section 139 of the said Act;

(ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता बही रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उपधारा (2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकर से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy ofsuch statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above .

(iv ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेंगा और उपर्यकुत लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2 The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization:

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वर्षिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(क) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित पृथक लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub -paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or (b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub-

paragraph (iii) of paragraph 1 ; or

(ख) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ (iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub -paragraph ( iv) of paragraph 1 ; or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or ( ग) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(e) ceases to conformto and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii) ofsub -section ( 1 ) ofsection 35 ofthe said Act read with rules SC and SE of the saidRules.

[Notification No.40/2008/F.No.203 / 12/2008/TTA- II ] SURENDER PAL, Under Secy.

(ड.) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5ग और 55. के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रधाधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहींकरेगा ।

नई दिल्ली , 17 मार्च , 2008

[अधिसूचना सं. 40/2008/फा.सं.203 / 12/2008/आ.क.पि-11 ] सुरेन्द्रपाल , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 17th March, 2008

का. आ. 802.-सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमवाली ) के नियम 5 ग और ऽड. के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2004 से. संगठन मैसर्स विवेकानंद योग अनुसंधान संस्थान , बंगलौर को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से संलग्न ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थात्ः-

(i ) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

S.O.801. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Triupati , Andhra Pradesh has been approved by theCentral Governme it purpose of clause ( ii) of section ( 1 ) of section 35 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 ( ad Act), read with Rules SC and 5E of the Income-tax Rules , 1962(saidRules), with effect from 1-4-2005 in the category of ' University' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely:-

[भाग -खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता बही रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान कार्य करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि को दर्शाएगा तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उपधारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता-बढ़ी की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप- धारा( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेख्खा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आचकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा

(iv ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्यवुत लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(क) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित पृथक लेखा यही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(ख ) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा (ग ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप - पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(घ ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा (रु. ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5 छ. के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड (ii ) के प्रवाधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[ अधिसूचना सं. 39/2008/फा.सं. 203/96/2007/आ.क.नि- II ] सुरेन्द्र पाल , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 17th March, 2008

S.O. 802.It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Vivekananda Yoga Anusandhana Samsthana, Bangalore , has been approved by the Central Governmentfor the purpose of clause ( ii) of sub- section (1) of section 35 of the Income-tax Act , 1961 (said Act ) , read with Rules SC and SE ofthe Income-tax Rules , 1962 (saidRules), with effect from 1-4-2004 in the category of 'other Institution' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions, namely:-

(1) The suns paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research ;

(it) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

1615

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

(ii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books ofaccounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research, get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub-section (2 ) of section 288 ofthe saidAct and furnish the report ofsuch audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income- tax or the Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case, by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 139 of the said Act;

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such. statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above.

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization:

(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub-paragraph ( iii) of paragraph 1 ; or (b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph (iii ) ofparagraph 1 ; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub- paragraph (iv ) ofparagraph 1; or (d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine ; or (e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions ofclause ( ii) of sub-section ( 1 ) ofsection 35 ofthe said Act read with rules 5C and SE ofthe saidRules.

[NotificationNo.39/2008/F.No.203/96/2007/ITA-11] SURENDER PAL, Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 18 मार्च, 2008

का.आ. 803.--सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 ( उक्त नियमवाली ) के नियम 5ग और 58. के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धाग्र 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( iii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2004 सेसंगठन मैसर्स गुजरात इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ डेवलपमेंट रिसर्च, अहमदाबाद को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुसंधान कार्यकलाप में आंशिक रूप से संलग्न ' अन्य संस्था ' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थात्:-

(i ) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग सामाजिक विज्ञान के अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

(ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से सामाजिक विज्ञान अथवा सांख्यिकीय अनुसंधान में अनुसंधान का कार्य करेगा;

1616

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन बही-खाखा रखेगा तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता-बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत विथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामलें में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

( iv) अनुमोदित संगठन सामाजिक विज्ञान अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्यकुत लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा । 2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वपिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन :-

(क) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ (iii ) में उल्लिखित अलग लेखा यही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(ख ) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा: अथवा (ग) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित सामाजिक विज्ञान अथवा सांख्यिकीय अनुसंधान में अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा (ड. ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5 6. के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रवाधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा ठनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[ अधिसूचना सं. 44/2008 /फा.सं. 203/133/2007/आ.क.नि-11 ]

सुरेन्द्र पाल , अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 18th March, 2008

S.O. 803. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Gujrat Institute of Development Research, Ahmedabad, has been approved bythe Central Government for the purpose of clause ( lii) of sub-section ( 1 ) of section 35 of the Income- tax Act , 1961 (saidAct), read with Rules SC and SE of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (said Rules ) , with effect from 1-4-2004 in the category of ' other Institution ' , partly engaged in research activities subjectto the following conditions , namely:-

The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for research in social sciences;

(i) The approved organization shall carry out research in social science or statistical research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

(ii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books ofaccounts in respect of the sums received

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub - section (2) ofsection 288 ofthe said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income- tax or the Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 139 of the said Act;

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for research in social sciences and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referredto above.

2 The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization :

(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub -paragraph ( iii) of paragraph 1; or (0) fails to fumish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph (iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for research in social sciences or statistical research referred to in sub- paragraph (iv) ofparagraph 1; or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or (e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( iii ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 35 of the said Act, read with rules 5C and SE of the saidRules ,

[Notification No. 44/2008/F No. 203/ 133 /2007 /ATA -11 ] SURENDER PAL, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 18 मार्च , 2008

का. आ. 804.-सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एत‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग और 5घ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2006 से संगठन मैसर्स हरकिसनदास नरोत्तमदास मेडिकल रिसर्च सोसायटी , मुम्बई को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगी ' वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थात्:-

(i ) अनमोदित " वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ " का एकमात्र उद्देश्य वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करना होगा;

( ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन स्वयं वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान कार्य- कलाप जारी रखेगा;

(iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन बही-खाता रखेगा तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप- धास ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकर से अपनी खम्ता- बहीं की लेखा 1617 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( it) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

over the case, by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 139 ofthe saidAct;

परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप-धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy ofsuch statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above.

2 The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization :-

(iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्थकुत लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

(a) fails to maintain books of accounts referred to in sub-paragraph ( iii) of parag.. h 1 ; or 2 केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन :

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph ( lii ) of paragraph 1; or

(क ) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा यही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(c) fails to furnish its statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research referred to in sub-paragraph ( iv ) of paragraph 1 ; or (ख) पैराग्राफ । के उप - पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be gemuine; or ( ग ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक

अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एवं प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions ofclause (ii) of sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 35 ofthe said Act, read with rules SC and 5D ofthe saidRules.

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्यकलाप करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्यकलाप को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा

(ड) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5 घ के साथ पठित

[Notification No. 43/2008/F.No. 203/ 125/2007 /TA- II] SURENDER PAL, Under Secy. ( वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 4 अप्रैल , 2008

तक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहींकरेगा ।

[ अधिसूचना सं. 43 /2008/फा.सं.203/ 125/2007/आ.क.नि- II ] सुरेन्द्र पाल , अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 18th March,2008

का.आ. 805, -राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबन्ध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खण्ड 3 के उप - खण्ड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित, बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जुन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उप - धाय 3 (ज ) तथा ( 3 - क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्‌द्वारा श्री सुवर्ण सान्याल , को अधिसूचना की तिथि से तीन वर्षों की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक , जो भी पहले हो, कार्पोरेशन बैंक के निदेशक मण्डल में अंशकालीन गैर- सरकारी निदेशक के रूम में नामित करती है ।

[फा. सं. 9/22/2006-बीओ -1 ] जी. बी. सिंह, उप सचिव 5.O. 804. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Sir Hurkisondas Nurrotundas Medical Research Society, Mumbai has been approvedby the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii) of sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income- taxAct, 1961 (said Act), read with Rules 5C and SD ofthe Income- tax Rules, 1962 (said Rules ) , with effect from 1-4-2006 in the category of 'Scientific ResearchAssociation" subject to the following conditions, namely:-

(Department ofFinancial Services) New Delhi , the 4th April, 2008

The sole objective of the approved ' Scientific Research Association ' shall be to undertake scientific research;

(i) The approved organization shall carry on the scientific research activity by itself,

S.O. 805.In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section 3 (h) and (3-4 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer ofUndertakings ) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub -clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 of the Nationalised Banks ( Management & Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Suvarna Sanyal as part-time non- official Director on the Board ofDirectors of Corporation Bank for a period ofthree years from the date ofnotification oruntil further orders, whichever is earlier .

(i) The approved organization shall maintain books of accounts and get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section (2) ofSection 288 ofthe saidAct and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified bysuch accountant to the Commissioner of Income- taxor theDirector of Income-tax having jurisdiction

[F. No. 9/22/2006-BO-I ] G. B. SINGH, Dy. Secy.

1618

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 ,1930

[PART I-SEC. 3( ii)] नई दिल्ली , 4 अप्रैल , 2008

स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 3 अप्रैल , 2008

का, आ. 808. - केन्द्र सरकार ने भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण में और हरियाणा सरकार से परामर्श करने के बाद डॉ. सिहाग कमलबीर सिंह , सुपुत्र श्री गणपत राम सिहाग, मकान नं. 944, सेक्टर -8 , पंचकुला को दिनांक 21-04-2008 से पांच वर्षों की अवधि के लिए भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद के सदस्य के रूप में मनोनीत किया है:-

का. आ. 806 , -राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबन्ध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम , 1970/1980 के खण्ड 3 के उप- खण्ड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित , बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उप- धारा 3 (ज ) तथा (3 - क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्‌द्वारा श्री शैबल गुप्ता , को अधिसूचना की तिथि से तीन वर्षों की अवधिके लिए अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक, जो भी पहले हो , आन्ध्रा बैंक के निदेशक मण्डल में अंशकालीन गैर - सरकारी निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।

[फा. सं. 9/22/2006-बीओ -1 ] जी. बी. सिंह, उप सचिव

New Delhi , the 4th April, 2008

अतः अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में , केन्द्र सरकार एतद्‌द्वारा भारत सरकार के तरकालीन स्वास्थ्य मंत्रालय की दिनांक 9 जनवरी , 1960 की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आL. 138 में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:-

उक्त अधिसूचना में " धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड (क) के अधीन मनोनीत " शीर्षक के अंतर्गत क्रम संख्या 16 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी; अर्थात्:-

S.O. 806. In exercise ofthe powers conferredby sub-section 3 (h ) and (3 -A) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer ofUndertakings) Act , 1970/1980 read with sub -clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 of the Nationalised Banks (Management & Miscellanous Provisions) Scheme , 1970/1980, the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Shaibal Gupta as part-time поп- official Director on the Board ofDirectors ofAndhra Bank for a period ofthree years from the date of notification or until further orders, whichever is earlier .

" 16. डॉ. सिहाग कमलबीर सिंह , सुपुत्र श्री गणपत राम सिहाग , मकान नं. 944 , सेक्टर-8 , पंचकुला हरियाणा सरकार" [सं. वी-11013/2/2007 - एमई ( नीति-4 ) ] एस. के. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव [F. No.9/22/2006-BO- I ] G. B. SINGH , Dy. Secy.

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE NewDelhi , the 3rd April ,2008

(बीमा प्रभाग) नई दिल्ली, 9 अप्रैल , 2008

S.O. 808.-Whereas the Central Government , in pursuance of clause ( a) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Indian'Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) and in. consultation with the Government of Haryana have nominated Dr. Sihag Kamalveer Singh, S/o Shri Ganpat Ram Sihag, H. No. 944, Sector-8 , Panchkula to be a member oftheMedical Council of India for a period of five years with effect from 21-04-2008.

का.आ. 807.-बीमा विनियामक और विकास प्राधिकरण अधिनियम, 1999 ( 1999 का 41 ) की धारा 4 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्‌द्वारा , श्रीमती सुषमा नाथ , सचिव , व्यय विभाग , वित्त मंत्रालय को श्री प्रदीप कुमार , सचिव, रक्षा उत्पादन विभाग , रक्षा मंत्रालय के स्थान पर बीमा विनियामक और विकास प्राधिकरण ( आईआरडीए ) में तत्काल प्रभाव से अगले आदेशों तक, अंशकालिक सदस्य के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[ फा नं. 11/6/2003- बीमा- [ 11 ] एस. के. जिन्दल , उप सचिव

(InsuranceDivision)

Now,therefore, in pursuance ofthe provision ofsub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, the Central Governmenthereby makes the following further amendment in the Notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry ofHealth number S.O. 138 dated the 9th January, 1960, namely:

New Delhi, the 9th April, 2008

In the said Notification, under the heading, "Nominated under clause ( a) of sub-section ( 1 ) ofSection 3", for serial number 16 and the entries thereto, the following entries shall be substituted , namely:-

Government of Haryana"

"16. Dr. Sihag Kamalveer Singh Sło Shri Ganpat Ram Sihag H.No. 944, Sector-8, Panchkula

S.O. 807.In exercise of the powers conferredby Section 4 of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Act, 1999 (41 of 1999), the Central Goverument hereby appoints Smt . Sushma Nath, Secretary, Department ofExpenditure, Ministry ofFinance as Part-time member of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) vice Shri Pradeep Kumar Secretary, Department of DefenceProduction , Ministry ofDefence with immediate effect and until further orders .

[No. V. 11013/2/2007-ME( P- 1 )]

S. K. GUPTA, Under Secy .

[F. No. 11 /6/2003-Ins. - IIT] S. K. JINDAL, Dy. Šecy.

1619

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12 , 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

[भाग [1-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

पोत परिवहन , सड़क परिवहन और राजमार्ग मंत्रालय ( पोत परिवहन विभाग ) (प्रशासन [ [ अनुभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 7 अप्रैल , 2008

मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय ( उच्चतर शिक्षा वि মান ) (यूनेस्कोयूनिट) नई दिल्ली, 27 मार्च, 2008

का. आ. 810,-फाईल सं. एच-11020/2/2005-स्था. के अंतर्गत जारी दिनांक 11 अक्तूबर, 2005 के का. आ 1484 ( म) में आंशिक संशोधन करते हुए और फाईल सं. आई 35019/3/2006- आर टी. आई. के अंतर्गत जारी दिनांक 5 जनवरी , 2007 के बाद के संशोधन और " सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम , 2005 " ( 2005 का 22 ) की धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में पोत परिवहन विभाग ( मुख्यालय ) , पोत परिवहन , सड़क परिवहन और राजमार्ग मंत्रालय, एत‌द्वारा : :

का. आ. 809.-आरोविले प्रतिष्ठान अधिनियम , 1988 (1988 का 54 ) की धारा 11 , उप - धारा 1 (ii ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए और भारत के राजपत्र के भाग II खण्ड 3 ( ii ) में दिनांक 6 सितम्बर , 2004 को प्रकाशित भारत सरकार , मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय , शिक्षा विभाग की अधिसूचना संख्या 27-50/2002-यूनेस्को यूनिट में आंशिक संशोधन करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से निम्नलिखित व्यक्ति को आयेविले प्रतिष्ठान के शासी निकाये में श्री सी. बालकृष्णन , पूर्व संयुक्त सचिव (योजना प्रभाग ) के स्थान पर शासी बोर्ड के शेष कार्यकाल अर्थात् 5 सितम्बर , 2008 तक सदस्य नियुक्त करती है ।

(1) लेखा और बजट से संबंधित सभी विषयों के लिए, श्री संजय पांडे , जिन्हें स्थानांतरित कर दिया गया है , के स्थान पर श्री बीरी सिंह, लेखा नियंत्रक ( दूरभाष सं 23381410 ) आई डी ए बिल्डिंग , जामनगर हाउस , नई दिल्ली-110011 , को केन्द्रीय लोक सूचना अधिकारी के रूप में नामोद्दिष्ट करता है;

-पदेन सदस्य श्री सुनिल कुमार संयुक्त सचिव ( यूनेस्को प्रभाग ) उच्चतर शिक्षा विभाग मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय शास्त्रीभवन , नई दिल्ली [फा. सं 27-2/2008 - यूयू] एस. के. शर्मा , निदेशक

(ii) पोत परिवहन विभाग से संबंधित विषयों के वित्तीय पक्षों से संबंधित सभी मसलों के लिए, श्री टी. श्रीनिधि, जिन्हें स्थानांतरित कर दिया गया है , के स्थान पर डॉ. ए. आर. गोयल , निदेशक ( वित्त ) ( दूरभाष सं. 23710213 ) ( कमरा सं $23 ) , परिवहन भवन, नई दिल्ली, को केन्द्रीय लोक सूचना अधिकारी के रूप में नामोद्दिष्ट करता है ;

MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT (Department ofHigher Education) (UNESCO Unit) New Delhi , the27th March , 2008

(ii) पोत परिवहन विभाग के परिवहन अनुसंधान स्कंध के संबंधित सभी विषयों के लिए, श्रीमती श्री. मैथली , जिन्हें पदोन्नत कर दिया गया है , के स्थान पर श्री एम. आर . रामचन्दानी , संयुक्त निदेशक (पोत- परिवहन/समन्वय) ( दूरभाष से 23387256 ) आई डी ए बिल्डिंग , जामनगर हाउस , नई दिल्ली-110011 , कोकेन्द्रीय लोक- सूचना अधिकारी के रूप में नामोद्दिष्ट करता है;

[फा. सं. आई-35019/3/2006- आर टी आई ) ए. एम. विजयन , अवर सचिव S.O. 809. In exercise of the powers conferredby Section 11 , sub-section 1 (ii ) of the Auroville Foundation Act, 1988 (54 of 1988 ) and in partial modification of the Government of India, Ministry of Human Resource Development ofEducation Notification No. 27-50/2002- UUdated 6th September , 2004 published in the Gazette of India, Part II , Section 3 ( ii ) , the Central Government hereby nominates with effect from the date of issue of this Notification, the following person as Member on the Governing Board ofthe Auroville Foundation in place of Shri C.Balakrishnan , former Joint Secretary (Pig . Division) for remaining term ofthe Board i.e. upto 5th September, 2008:-

Shri Sunil Kumar Joint secretary (UNESCO Division) -Ex -officio Member

MINISTRY OF SHIPPING , ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS (Department ofShipping) (Estt. II Section) NewDelhi . the 7th April, 2008 Department ofHigher Education Ministry ofHuman Resource Development Shastri Bhawan , NewDelhi [F. No. 27-2/2008-UU ]

S. K. SHARMA , Director

S.O. 810.In Partial modification ofS.O.1484 ( E) dated 11th October , 2005 issud under File No. H - 11020/2/ 2005-Estt and subsequent modification dated 5th January, 2007 issued under File No. 1. 35019/3 /2006-RTI and in pursuance of sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 5 of the Rightto Information Act, 2005 (22 of 2005 ) , the Department of 1620

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

Shipping (Headquarters) , Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways hereby designate:

(1) Shri Biri Singh, controller ofAccounts [Tel No. 23381410 ] IDA Building , Jamnagar House, New Delhi - 110 011 as Central Public Information Officer (CPIO ) for all matters concerning Accounts and Budget of the Department ofShipping in place of Shri Sanjay Pande who has been transferred;

(11) Dr. A. R. Goyal , Director (Finance ) [Tel No. 23710213 ) (Room No. 523 ) , Transport Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 001 as Central Public Information Officer ( CPIO) for all matters concerning financial aspects of proposals relatingto the Department of Shipping inplace of Shri T. Srinidhi who has been transferred; and

(III) Shri M. R. Ramchandani , Joint Director (S/ Coordination ) ( Tel No. 23387256) IDA Building, Jamnagar House , New Delhi-110011 as Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) forall matters concerning Transport Research Wing of the Department of Shipping in place of Smt. G. Mythili who has been promoted.

[FileNo. 1-35019/3 /2006 - RTT] A. M. VIJAYAN, Under Secy.

वस्य मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 31 मार्च , 2008

का. आ. 811 , -केंद्र सरकार एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित करती है कि राज्य सभा ने केंद्रीय रेशम बोर्ड अधिनियम , 1948 की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) के अनुसरण में इस अधिनियम के प्रावधानों के अध्यधीन श्री बी. के. हरीप्रश्शद, सदस्य , राज्य सभा को तीन वर्षों की अवधि के लिए केंद्रीय रेशम बोर्ड के सदस्य के रूप में कार्य करने के लिए 18 मार्च , 2008 को विधिवत चुन लिया है ।

[फा. सं. 25012/1 /2008 -रेशम] भूपेन्द्र सिंह , संयुक्त सचिव :

MINISTRY OF TEXTILES New Delhi , the 31stMarch , 2008 S.O. 811.-The Central Government hereby notifies that the Rajya Sabha has in pursuance of clause ( c) of sub- section (3) ofSection 4 ofthe Central Silk Board Act , 1948, duly elected Shri B. K. Hariprasad , Member, Rajya Sabha , on 18th March, 2008 to serve as a member of the Central Silk Board for a period of three years subject to the provisions of theAct.

[F. No. 25012/1/2008 -Silk] BHUPENDRA SINGH , It. Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 7 अप्रेत्र , 2008

का. आ. 812, केन्द्रीय रेशभ बोर्ड अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 61 ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग

[PART 11-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ]

हुए, केन्द्र सरकार एत‌द्वारा उपर्युक्त अधिनियम के प्रावधानों के अध्यधीन इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए केन्द्रीय रेशम बोर्ड के सदस्यों के रूप में कार्य करने के लिए निम्नलिखित व्यक्तियों का नामांकन अधिसूचित करती है:

1. श्रीमती एम, सत्यवती , सदस्य सचिव, केन्द्रीय रेशम बोर्ड, बेंगलूर

इस अधिनियम की धारा 4(3) ( जी) के तहत केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा नामित इस अधिनियम की धारा 4(3 ) ( एफ ) के तहत केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा नामित

2. वस्त्र आयुक्त , पश्चिमबंगाल सरकार , सूक्ष्म एवं लघु उद्यम तथा वस्त्र विभाग , राइटर्स बिल्डिंग , कोलकाता-700001

इस अधिनियम की धारा 4(3 ) (जी) के तहत्त केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा नामित

3. श्री एल. एन. तामुली , आई. ए. एस. , सचिष , असम सरकार , हथकरघा, वस्त्र एवं रेशम विभाग , दिसपुर, गुवाहाटी-781006 (असम)

[फा. सं. 25012/56/99-रेशम] भूपेन्द्र सिंह, संयुक्त सचिव NewDelhi , the 7thApril , 2008

S.O. 812. In exercise ofpowers conferredby sub- section (3) ofSection 4 ofthe Central Silk Board Act, 1948, the Central Government hereby notifies the nomination of the following persons to serve as members of the Central Silk Board for a period three years from the date of this notification subject to the provisions of the said Act.

Nominated by the Central Government under Section 4(3 )(b) of theAct.

J. Smt. M. Sathiyavathy, Member Secretary, Central Silk Board, Bangalore.

Nominated bythe Central Government under Section 4(3)(1) oftheAct.

2. Commissioner ofTextiles, Government of West Bengal , Department ofMicro& Small Scale Enterprises & Textiles, Writer's Building, Kolkatta-700001 .

Nominated by the Central Government under Section 4( 3 )( g ) ' of the Act .

3. Shri L. N. Tamuly , I.A.S, SecretarytoGovernment of Assam, Handlooms , Textile and Sericulture Dept.. Dispur, Gauwahati - 781006 (Assam)

[F. No. 25012/56/99-Silk ] BHUPENDRA SINGH , Jt. Secy .

विद्युत मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , ।। मार्च , 2008

का. आ. 813.- केंद्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम 4 के [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

अनुसरण में पावरग्रिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया लि. , गुड़गांव , रूरल इलेक्ट्रीफिकेशन कॉरपोरेशन लि. , नई दिल्ली वा नैशनल हाइड्रोइलेक्ट्रिक पावर कारपोरेशन लि. , फरीदाबाद के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन कार्यालयों को, जिनके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारीमुंद ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करती है:-

1. पावरग्रिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया लि. , दक्षोपाप्र -1 , 400 केवी खम्मम उप केन्द्र , यूडिदमपाडु गांव , कोम्मिनेपल्लि (पोस्ट) , खम्मम ( जिला) -507182 (आ.प्र.)

2 पावरग्रिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया लि. , 400/220 के.वी. तप केंद्र , 22 के. एम. अकलकोट रोड, ग्रामः लिंबी सिंचोली, पो. वालसँग , ता. दक्षिण सोलापुर , जिला: सोलापुर-413 228 ( महाराष्ट्र)

3. पावरग्रिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया लि. , प्लाट नं . 217 , वार्ड नं. 7 , नगर परिषद ले आऊट , बस स्टॉप के पीछे , देवली , जिला: वर्धा-442 101 ( महाराष्ट्र)

4. पावरग्रिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया लि. 400/220 के. वी. गैस इन्सुलेटेड उप केंद्र, प्लाट नं. टी-1 ; ग्रामः टेम्पोडे , डाकघरः कलम्बोली, नवी मुंबई-410 218 ( महाराष्ट्र)

5. पावरग्रिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया लि. परली नाका, परली रोड, ग्रामः शेपवाडी, अंबाजोगाई, जिला बीड -431 517 ( महाराष्ट्र) 6 पावरग्रिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया लि. फ्लैट नं. एस-3 , माणिक आर्केड , चेतना नगर , औरंगाबाद -431 005 ( महाराष्ट्र)

7. पावरग्रिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया लि. " ओम हर्षनंदन विल्डिंग " , तीसरा बंगलो, विडला कंपाऊंड, बिहला रोड, अकोला-444 005 (महाराष्ट्र)

8. रूरल इलेक्ट्रीफिकेशन कारपोरेशन लि. 1/5 , अलसूर रोड , बैंगलूर-560 042

9. नैशनल हाइड्रोइलैक्ट्रिक पावर कारपोरेशन लि. लखवाड़ व्यासी परियोजना , ईई-5 , टाँस कालोनी, डाकपत्थर, देहरादून ( उत्तराखंड )

10. नैशनल हाइड्रोइलैक्ट्रिक पावर कारपोरेशन लि. संपर्क कार्यालय , फोरेस्ट व्यू भवन, नव बहार चौक , शिमला ।

[सं 11017/1/2007-हिंदी]

देवेन्द्रसिंह, संयुक्त सचिव 1188 01/06-3

1621

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12 , 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

MINISTRY OF POWER

NewDelhi , the 11th March, 2008

S.O.813. In pursuance ofSub Rule (4) ofRule 10 ofthe Official Language (use for Official Purposes ofthe Union) Rules, 1976 the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices under the administrative control of Powergrid Corporation of India Ltd. , Gurgaon, Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd., New Delhi and National HydroelectricPower Corporation Ltd. , Faridabad, the stalk whereofhave acquired 80 % working knowledge ofHindi :-

1. Powergrid Corporation of IndiaLtd., SRTS-1,400 KV Khammam Sub-Station, Budidampadu Village , Komminepalli (Post); Khammam(Distt.)-507182 (A. P.)

2. Powergrid Corporation of India Ltd. , 400/220 KV Sub-Station , 22nd K.M. Akkalkot Road, Village: Limbi-Chincholi, Post: Walsang, Taluka: South Solapur, Distt. Solapur 413 228 (Maharashtra)

3. PowergridCorporation of India Ltd. , PlotNo. 217, WardNo.7 ,Nagar Parishad Layout , Behind Bus Stop, Deoli, Distt . Wardha-442 101 ( Maharashtra) 4. Powergrid Corporation of India Ltd. , 400/220 KV Gas Insulated Substation, Plot No. T- 1 ,Village: Tembode, P.O. Kalamboli, Navi Mumbai -410218 (Maharashtra)

5. PowergridCorporation of India Ltd., ParliNaka,Parli Road, Village-Shepwadi, Ambajogai , Distt. Beed - 431 517 (Maharashtra) 6. Powergrid Corporation of India Ltd., FlatNo. S-3 , Manik Arcade , Chetna Nagar, Arangabad-431005

7. Powergrid Corporation of India Ltd., "OM Harshnandan Building", 3rd Bangalow, Birla Compound , Birta Road, Akola-444 005 (Maharashtra)

8. Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd. , 1/5, Ulsoor Road, Bangalore-560042

9. National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd., Lakhwar Vyasi Project, EE- 5 , Tons Colony, Dakpathar, Dehradun. (U.K.)

10. National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd. , LiaisonOffice, Forest View Building, Nav Bahar Chowk, Shimla.

[No. 11017/1/2007-Hindi )

DEVENDER SINGH , It. Secy.

1622

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12,-2008 /CHAITRA 23 , 1930

संचार और सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय

क्रम सं.

(दूरसंचार विभाग )

1 (राजमात्रा अनुभाग )

1. गई दिल्ली , 25 मार्च , 2008

7. का, आ. 814,-केंद्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 ( यथासंशोधित 1987 ) के नियम 10 ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में संचार और सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय , दूरसंचार विभाग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को, जिसमें 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , एत‌द्धारा अधिसूचित करती है ।

9. मुख्य महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार , कर्नाटक परिमंडल , भा.सं. मि.लि., बेंगलूर

10. 1. महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार का कार्यालय , मंडभा

11 .

2. मंडल अभियंता ( नगर ) का कार्यालय , मंडधा

12.

13. [सं. ई 11016/1 /2007-रा. भा. (पार्ट-1) ] कीर्ति कुमार , उप महानिदेशक ( समन्वय एवं प्रशासन )

14.

15. MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

16.

17. (Department ofTelecommunications) (O. L. Section)

18. NewDelhi , the 25th March, 2008

19.

20.

21 .

22.

23.

24.

25. S.O. 814. In pursuance ofrule 10(4) ofthe Official Language (Use for Official Purpose of the Union), Rules, 1976(as amended- 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies the following Offices under the administrative control of Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, Department ofTelecommunications whereof more than 80% ofstaff have acquired working knowledge ofHindi.

26.

27. ChiefGeneral Manager (Telecom. ), Karnataka Circle, B.S.N.L. , Bangalore

28. 1.Office ofthe General Manager Telecommunications, Mandya

29.

31.

32. 2. Office ofthe Divisional Engineer (City) , Mandya [No. E.11016/ 1 /2007-0 . L. (Part- 1)] KIRTHY KUMAR, Dy. Director General (Coordination & Admin .)

33.

34. (डाक विभाग)

35. नई दिल्ली , 25 मार्च, 2008

36.

37.

38.

39.

40. का. आ. B15, - राजभाषा नियम ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजन के लिए प्रयोग ) 1976 के नियम-10 के उप नियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्र सरकार , डाक विभाग के अधीनस्थ कार्यालयों को जिसके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारी ( ग्रुप व कर्मचारियों को छोड़कर ) ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, अधिसूचित करती है ।

[PART 1 ]-SEC . 3 ( ii)] कार्यालयों का नाय

पिन कोड डाकघर का नाम

172001 रामपुर बुशहर मुख्य डाकघर

172026 आनी उघडाकघर

172002 अरसू उपडाकघर

172027 बडागांव उपडाकघर

172034 बौन्डा उपडाकघर

172032 चौवाई उपडाकघर

172025 दलाश उपडाकघर

172028 देलठ उपडाकघर

172101 ज्योरी उपडाकघर

172201 झाखडी उपडाकघर

172024 किंगल उपडाकघर

172031 कोटगढ़ उपडाकघर

172029 कुमारसैन उपडाकघर

172021 ननखरी उपडाकघर

172023 निरमण्ड उपडाकघर

172033 निथर उपडाकघर

172103 निचार उपडाकघर

172022 नोगली उपडाकघर

172001 पदमनगर उपडाकघर

172102 सराहन बुशहर उपडाकघर

172030 थानेदार उपडाकघर

172107 रिकागपियों मुख्य डाकघर

172115 भावानगर उपडाकघर

172118 कष्टगांव उपडाकघर

172105 करडम उपडाकघर

172104 टापरी उपडाकघर

172106 सांगला उपडाकघर

कल्या उपडाकघर

172108

172116 रिख्या उपडाकघर

172110 स्पीलो उपडाकघर

172109 मूंरंग उपडाकघर

172111 पूह उपडाकघर

172112 लियो उपडाकघर

172113 ताबो उपडाकघर

172114 काय उपडाकघर

172117 सगनमें उपड़ाकघर

177101 देहरा गोपीपुर मुख्य डाकघर

177106 डाडासीबा उपडाकघर

177103 दलियारा उपडाकघर

177108 गरली उपडाकघर [भाग खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

41.

176028 हरिपुर तपडाकघर

176031 42

ज्वालामुखी उपडाकघर

176030 43.

बुद्धियां उपडाकघर

176036 कोहाला उपडाकघर

44.

177104 45.

नैहरन पुखर उपडाकघर

177107 46.

प्रागपुर उपडाकघर

177034 47.

पीरसलूही उपहाकघर

177043 48.

रक्कड़ उपडाकघर

176501 49.

संसारपुर टैरस उपडाकघर

177105 ठोर उपडाकघर

50.

177112 51.

टिपरी उपडाकघर

176001 52.

कांगडा मुख्यडाकंघर

176054 53.

बडोह उपडाकघर

176021 54

भरमेड उपडाकघर

176025 55.

धमेटा उपडाकघर

176025 56.

फतेहपुर उपडाकघर

गगल उपेडाकघर

176209 57.

ज्वाली उपडाकघर

176023 58.

176047 59.

नगरोटी बगवां उपडाकघर

176047 60.

नगरोटी सुरिया उपहाकघर

176051 61 .

राजा-का-तालाब उपडाकघर

176208 62

रैत उपडाकघर

176029 63.

यनीताल उपडाकघर

176029 64.

रैहन उपडाकघर

176037 65.

सुन्ही उपडाकघर

176056 66.

सुन्हेड़ उपडाकघर

176214 67.

तियारा उपडाकघर

अम्ब उपडाकघर

68.

177203

177205 69.

अम्बोटा उपडाकघर

70.

बंगाना उपडाकघर

174307

174317 71.

पदसाली उपडाकघर

72.

177109 भरवाई उपडाकघर

174316 भैरा उपडाकघर

73.

74.

177110 चिंतपूर्णी उपडाकघर

174314 75.

चौकीमनियार उपडाकघर

174302 76.

धुसाडा उपडाकघर

177204 77.

दौलतपुर चौक उपडाकघर

174306 देहलां उपद्वाकघर

176601 79.

दुलैहड उपडाकघर

गगरेट उपडाकघर

177201 80.

177212 81 .

घनारी उपडाकघर

177213 82.

गोन्दपुर बनैहरा उपडाकघर

1623

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23 , 1930

3 1

83.

177220 हरोली उपडाकघर

84.

लठियानी उपहाकघर

174308 85

174315 मैहतपुर उपंडाकघर

86.

177202 मुबारिकपुर उपडाकघर

174319 87.

मरवाडी उपहाकघर

177210 नैहरी नौरंगा उपडाकभर

77206 ओयल उपडाकघर

89.

177207 90.

पन्डोगा उपडाकघर

177208 पंजाबर उपडाकघर

91 .

174503 92.

पूवोवाल उपाकघर

93.

177031 रायेपुर उपडाकघर

177203 सलोह उपडाकघर

94.

95.

174301 संतोखगढ़ उपडाकघर

177219 सुन्काली उपडाकघर

177039 सोहरी उपडाकघर

97.

174320 तलमेडा उपडाकघर

98.

174321 99.

थानाकलां उपडाकघर

177211 100.

टक्ल उपड़ाकघर

101 .

174303 ऊना मुख्य डाकघर

102.

ऊना डाक मण्डल ऊना

174303

[सं. 11017-1 /2007-रा. भा. ] के. पी. सेठी , उप महानिदेशक ( एमएम एवं राजभाषा) (Department ofPosts) New Delhi , the 25th March ,2008

S.O. 815.-In pursuance of rule 10 (4) of the Official Language (Use for official purposes ofthe Union), rule, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following Subordinate Offices of the Department of Posts where 80 percent staffhas acquired the worlring knowledge ofHindi :

PinCode Name ofPostOffice

Sl .No.

3 1

172001 1.

RampurBSR-HO

Ani-SO

172026 Arsu-SO

172002 3.

172027 Baragaon-SO

172034 5.

Bonda-SO

172632 Chowai-SO

172025 7.

Dalash-SO

172028 &

Dailath-SO

Jeori-SO

172101 Jhakri-SO

172201 10.

172024 11.

Kingal-SO

172031 12.

Kotgarh-SO 1624

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

3 13.

Kumarsain-SO

172029 14,

Nankhari -SO

172021 15.

Nimmand-SO

172023 16.

Nither-SO

172033 17.

Nichar-SO

172103 18.

172022 Nogli-SO

19.

172001 PadamNagar-SO

20.

Sarahan BSR-SO

172102 Thanedbar-SO

21.

172030 22.

172107 Reckong PEO- HO

23.

172115 BhawaNagar-SO

24.

172118 Katgaon-SO

25.

Karcham-SO

172105 26.

172104 Tapri -SO

27.

172106 Sangla-SO

28..

172108 Kalpa-SO

29.

Ribba-SO

172116 30.

172110 Speelo-SO

31.

172109 Moorang-SO

Pooh-SO

172111 33.

Leo-SO

172112 34.

Tabo-SO

172113 35.

Kaza-SO

172114 36.

172117 Sagnam-SO

37.

177101 DehraGopipur HO

177106 38

Dadasiba-SO

39.

Dhallara- SO

177103 Garl-SO

40.

177108 41.

176028 Haripur-SO

Jawalamukhi-SO

176031 43.

KhundianSO

176030 Kohala

176036. 44.

45.

Nehra-Pukher-SO

177104 46.

177107 Pragpur-SO

47.

Pirsalubi -SO

177034 48.

Rakkar-SO

177043 49.

S.P. Terrace SO

176501 50.

177105 Thore- SO

51 .

177112 Tipri-SO

176001 Kangra-HO

53 .

Baron-SO

176054

176021 Bharmar-SO

54.

55.

Dhemata-SO

176025 56.

176053 Fatepur-SO

57.

176209 Gaggal-SO

Jawali-SO

176023 58.

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ) 1

3 59.

176047 NagrotaBagwan-SO

60.

176047 Nagrota Surian -SO

61.

176051 Raja-ka-talab-SO

62.

Rait-SO

176208 63.

Ranital-SO

176029 64.

Rehan-SO

176022 Sunhi-SO

65.

176037 66.

Sunehar-SO

177056 67,

Teara-SO

176214 68.

Amb-SO

177203 69.

177205 Ambota-SO

70.

174307 Bangana-SQ

71.

Bhadsali-SO

174317 72.

Bharwain-SO

177109 73.

Bhera-SO

174316 74.

177110 Chintpurni-SO

75.

Chowkimaniar- SO

174314 76.

174302 Dhussara-SO

77.

Daulatpur Chowak-SO 177204 78.

Dehlan -SQ

174306 79.

Dulehar-SO

176601 80.

Gagret-SO

177201 81 .

Ghaneri-SO

177212 82.

177213 GondpurBanehra-SO

83.

Haroli-SO

177220 84.

174307 Lathiani -SO

85.

174315 Mehatpur

86,

177202 Mubarakpur-SO

87.

174319 Marwari-SO

88.

177210 Nehri -Nauranga-SO

89.

Oel-SO

177206 90.

177207 Pandoga-SO

91.

177208 Panjawar-SO

Pubowal-SO

174503 93.

177031 Raipur-SO

94.

Satoh-SO

177209 95.

174301 Santokhgarh-SO

96.

Sumkali -SO

177219 Sohari-SO

97.

177039 98.

Talmera-SO

174320 99.

Thanakalan - SO

175321 100.

Thathal -SO

177211 101.

UnaKPO

174303 102.

Una Postal Dvn .

174303

[No.11017-1 /2007-OL] K. P. SETHY, Dy. Director General (M. M. & OL) 1625 [ भाग II-खब्द 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12 , 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

( उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली, 26 मार्च, 2008

का. आ. 816.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियध 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( को ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं:.

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

क्रम संख्या

संशोधन लागू होने कीतिथि

(2)

( 1)

(3)

(4)

1 . 2685: 1971

31 मार्च 2008

सं. 2, मार्च 2008

2 3950:1979

सं. 1 , मार्च 2008

31 मार्च 2008

इस संशोधन की प्रति भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर भार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयोंः नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयोंः अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्द्रापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं।

[संदर्भ: सीईडी राजपत्र]

ए. के. सैनी, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी) MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department ofConsumerAffairs)

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

NewDelhi , the 26th March , 2008

S.Q. 816. In pursuance of clause (4) ofsub- rule (1 ) ofRule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, theBureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendment to the Indian Standards , particulars ofwhich are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued :

SCHEDULE

Sl . No.

Date from which No. & Year ofthe Indian Standards

No. &Year ofthe

Amendment

the Amendment shall have effect (1) (2)

(3)

(4)

1. 2685: 1971

2, March 2008

31 March,2008 2. 3950:1979

1,March2008

31 March,2008 Copy ofthis Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , ManakBhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and alsoBranch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: CED/Gazette]

A. K. SAINI, Scientist ' F' & Head (Civil Engg.)

नई दिल्ली, 2 अप्रैल , 2008

का. आ. 817. - भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम ? के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख) के अनुसरण में एत‌द्धारा अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे रद्द कर दिए गए हैं और वापस ले लिये गये हैं :-

1626

[PART II-SEC.3 (ii) ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23, 1930

अनुसूची

टिप्पणी

भारत के राजपत्र भाग

क्र.सं. रद्द किये गये मानक की सं. और वर्ष

2, खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) में का.आ. सं और तिथि प्रकाशित

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

31 मई 2000

मानक प्रचलन में नहीं रहा और प्रयोग में नहीं लाया जा रहा है 1. आईएस 3105 : 1980 ऑटोमोबाइल प्रकाश व्यवस्था और सिग्नलिंग उपकरणों की सामान्य अपेक्षाएं ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

-वही-

31मई 2003

2. आईएस 3563 : 1993 स्वचाल वाहन हैडलाइट ( बद‌ले जा सकने वाले लैम्प टाइप ) विशिष्टि ( द्वितीय पुनरीक्षण)

-वही-

31मई 2000

3. आईएस 3628: 1966 ऑटोमोबाइल प्रयोग की साइडलाइट , टेललाइट, पार्किंग लाइट , स्टॉप लाइट और दिशा संकेतक

31मई 2000

-वही-

4 आईएस 4370: 1967 कारों और व्यावसायिक वाहनों में प्रकाश व्यवस्था और सिग्नलिंग उपकरणों की रीति सहिंता

31 दिसम्बर 2006

5. आईएस 4916 : 1968 साइकिल सैडल की परीक्षण पद्धतियां

आईएस 7451 ( भाग 2 ) : 2006 द्वारा अधिक्रमित

31 मई 2004

आईएस 10613: 2004 में काठी की अपेक्षाएं शामिल हैं

आईएस 7451 ( भाग 3 ) : 1974 पश्चगमन आंतरिक दहन इंजिन : भाग 3 दाएं और बाएं हाथ के एकल बैंक इंजिन की परिभाषा

-वही-

31 मई 2004

7. आईएस 7451 ( भाग 4 ) 1974 पश्चगमन आंतरिक दहन इंजिन : भाग 4 धूणर्न दिशा के अभिनाम

-वही-

31 मई 2004

आईएस 7451 ( भाग 5 ) : 1974 पश्चगमन आंतरिक दहन इंजिन : भाग 5 सिलिंडर के अभिनाम

31 मई 2000

मानक प्रचलन में नहीं रहा और प्रयोग में नहीं लाया जा रहा है आईएस 8415: 1977 ऑटोमोबाइल के लिए हैडलाइट के अध्यारोपण के आयाम

-वही-

31मई 2000

10. आईएस 8416: 1977 ऑटोमोबाइल के लिए फॉग लाइट के आरोपण के आयाम

-वही-

31 मई 2000

11. आईएस 9961 : 1981 ऑटोमोबाइल प्रयोग के लिए रिवर्सिंग लाइट की विशिष्टि

-वही-

31 मई 2000

12 आईएस 10256: 1982 ऑटोमोबाइल के लिए स्टॉप , टेल और टर्न सिग्नल लाइट के संस्थापन की रीति संहिता

इस भारतीय मानक को प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों; अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध है ।

[संदर्भ : टीईडी/जी -16]

राकेश कुमार , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख( टी ई डी)

New Delhi , the 2nd April , 2008

S.O. 817-In pursuance of clause (b) ofsub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, it is, hereby notified that the Indian Standards, Particulars of which are mentioned in the Schedule give hereafter, have been cancelled and stand withdrawn.

1627 [ भाग खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

SCHEDULE

Remarks

S.O. No. &Date

No. &Year ofthe Indian Standards Cancelled

St No.

published in the Gazette of India Part- 11 , Section-3, Sub-section (ii)

(4) (1)

(3)

(2)

31May2000

1. IS3105:1980General requirements for automobile lighting and signaling devices (first revision)

Standardbecame obsolete and not in use

-do-

31May2003

2 IS3563: 1993 Automotive vehicles-Headlight (replaceable lamp type) Specification (second revision)

31May2000

-do-

3. IS3628: 1966 Sidelights, tail - light, parking lights, stop lights and direction indicators for automobile use

-do-

31 May2000

4. IS4370:1967 Code ofpractice for the use of lighting and signaling devices on cars and commercial vehicles

31 Dec2006

5. IS4916: 1968 Methods oftest for bicycle saddles

Superseded by IS 7451 (Part 2):2006

31May2004

Requirement of saddles covered in IS10613 :2004 6. IS7451 (Part 3): 1974 Reciprocating internal combustion engines: Part 3Definition of right hand and left hand single bank engines

-do-

31 May2004

7. IS7451 (Part 4) : 1974 Reciprocating internal combustion engines: Part 4Designation of direction ofrotation

-do-

31May2004

IS7451 (Part 5): 1974 Reciprocating internal combustion engines: Part 5 Designation of the cylinders

31May2000

9. IS 8415:1977 Mounting dimensions ofhead lights for automobiles

Standard became obsolete and not in use

-do-

31May2000

10. IS 8416: 1977 Mounting dimensions offog lights for automobile

-do-

31 May2000

11. IS9961: 1981 Specification for reversing lights for Butomobile

31 May2000

-do-

12. 1$10256: 1982 Code ofpractice for installation of stop, tail and turn signal lights for automobiles

Copyofthis Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: TED/G-16]

RAKESH KUMAR, Scientist ' P' & Head (Transport Engg. )

कोयला मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 31 मार्च , 2008

का. आ. 818, केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है ; P

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस क्षेत्र में कोयले के लिए पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ;

1628

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHATTRA 23 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. डी.जी. /8667 तारीख 14 नवम्बर , 2007 का निरीक्षण, महाप्रबंधक ( गवेषण प्रभाग) , सेंट्रल माइन प्लानिंग एण्ड डिजाइन इंस्टीच्यूट, गोंडवाना प्लेस, कॉके रोह , रांची के कार्यालय में कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काउंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता-700001 के कार्यालय में या जिला कलेक्टर, जिला रायगढ़ , छत्तीसगढ़ के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाली भूमि में हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा ( १ ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चारों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से नब्बे दिन के भीतर महाप्रबंधक ( गवेषणा प्रभाग ) , सेंट्रल माइन प्लानिंग एण्डडिजाइन इंस्टीच्यूट, गोंडवाना प्लेस, के रोड , रांची को भेजेंगे ।

अनुसूची

स्थांग ईस्ट "ए" ब्लाक , मांद रायगढ़ कोयला क्षेत्र जिला - रायगढ़ ( छत्तीसगढ़ )

रेखांक सं. डीजी/8667 तारीख 14 नवम्बर , 2007 सभी अधिकार

ग्राम

जिला

टिप्पणी.

क्र. सं

थाना/ तहसील

ग्राम संख्या

क्षेत्रफल (एकड़ में लगभग)

1 2

1. पोरिया

515.0

321200

208.5

भाग

रायगढ़

धमरजयगढ़

2 सिरका

321500

546.0

भाग

221.0

रायगढ़

धमरजयगढ़

525200

सरसा देवा कोरबा

44.0

109.0

भाग

रायगढ़

524000

अमलडीहा कोरवा

39.5

160

भाग

रायगढ़

करवला

530700

5. वनक्षेत्र

भाग

सुरक्षित वन क्षेत्र

1655.5

670.0

रायगढ़

कुल

2665.0( लगभग ) 1159.5( लगभग )

सीमा वर्णन:

क-

ख रेखा सरसा देवा ग्राम के " क " बिन्दु से आरंभ होती है , और अमलडीहा गांव के दक्षिणी छोर से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " ख " पर मिलती है ।

ख-ग रेखा पोरिया ग्राम के दक्षिण - पूर्वी भाग से होकर गुजरती हुई गांव के उत्तर- पूर्वी भाग के पूर्वी भाग में " ग " बिन्दु पर मिलती है । ग-घ रेखा जंगल से टेड़ी-पेड़ी गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " घ " पर मिलती है ।

रेखा " ध " से मुडती हुई सीधी जंगल रेखा पर बिन्दु " ङ " पर मिलती है ।

क-क रेखा वन से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " क " पर सरसा देवा गांव में वापस मिल जाती है ।

[फा सं. 43015/01/2008- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू- । ]

एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF COAL

NewDelhi , the 31st March, 2008

S.O.818.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that Coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the locality mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisitions and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ), the Central Government hereby given notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein;

The plan numberDG /8667 dated the 14th November, 2007 ofthe area covered by this notification can be inspected at the office ofGeneral Manager (Exploration Division ) , Central Mine Planning and Design Institute, Gondwana Place, -KankeRoad, Ranchi or at the office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street, Calcutta or at the office of the District Collector, District Raigarh , Chattisgarh.

[ भाग-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1629

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

All persons interested in the land covered by this notification shall deliver all maps, charts and other documents referred in sub -section (7) of Section 13 of the said Act to the General Manager (Exploration Division) , Central Mine Planning and Design Institute , Gondwana Place, Kanke Road, Ranchi within ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the OfficialGazette.

SCHEDULE

AllRights

Village

Thana/ Tehsil

Village No. SL No.

4 .1

1. Poriya

321200

Dharamjaigarh

2. Strica

321500

Dharamjaigarh

Korba

525200 3. Sarsadeva

4. Amaldiha Korba/ Kartala

524000/ 530700 5. Forest Total

BoundaryDescription

A-B

SYANG EAST-A BLOCK, Mand Raigarh Coalfield, District Raigarh, Chhatisgarh Planbearing number DG/8667 dated 14th November , 2007

Remarlos District

Area in Hectares (Approx)

Area in Acres (Approx)

8 5

208.5

Part 515.0

Raigarh

221.0

546.0

Part Raigarh

44.0

Part 109.0

Raigarh

Part 39.5

16.0

Raigarh

Part 1655.5 670.0

Raigarh

1159.0 (Approxi mately)

2865.0 (Approx) mately)

The line starts at point ' A' in village Sarsadewa and passes through southern part of Amaldiha village mad meets points 'B' .

B-C

The line passes through south -western part of village Poria & meets points 'C'.

C-D The line crossed curvely in the R.F. & meets point 'D ' on the edge of village Sirka.

DE The line turns & meets point ' E ' at the edge of forest boundary.

E-A

The line passes through in the forest & meets points ' A' in Sarsadewa village.

[F.No.43015/01/2008-PRIW- 1) M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy.

आदेश

नई दिल्ली, 31 मार्च , 2008

का.आ. 819.- कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( i ) के अधीन भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की जारी की गई अधिसूचना संख्यांक का.आ. 2577 तारीख 8 अक्तूबर , 2004 जो भारत के राजपत्र, भांग II , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) , तारीख 16 अक्तूबर , 2004 में प्रकाशित होने पर, उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त भूमि कहा गया है ) में खनिजों के खनन, खादान , बोर करने , उनकी खुदाई करने और तलाश करने , उन्हें प्राप्त करने , उन पर कार्य करने और उन्हें ले आने का अधिकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर , आत्यंतिक रूप से केंद्रीय सरकार में निहित हो गए हैं ;

और केंद्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड, नागपुर ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त कंपनी कहा गया है ) ऐसे निबंधनों और शतों का, जो केंद्रीय सरकार इस निमित्त अधिरोपित करना उचित समझे, अनुपालन करने के लिए तैयार है ;

अतः अब, केंद्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है , कि इस प्रकार निहित उक्त भूमि में पूर्वोक्त अधिकार तारीख 16 अक्तूबर , 2004 से केंद्रीय सरकार में इस प्रकार निहित बने रहने के बजाए, निम्नलिखित निबंधनों और शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए, उक्त सरकारी कंपनी में निहित हो जाएंगे , अर्थात्-

1188GI:08-4 1630

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

[PART II-SEC.3(3) ] 1. उक्त कंपनी , तक्त अधिनियम के उपबंधों के अधीन अवधारित प्रतिकर , ब्याज , नुकसानी और वैसी ही मदों की बाबत किए गए सभी संदायों की केंद्रीय सरकार को प्रतिपूर्ति करेगी ।

2. उक्त कंपनी द्वारा शर्त ( 1 ) के अधीन, केंद्रीय सरकार को संदेय रकमों का अवधारण करने के प्रयोजनों के लिए एक अधिकरण का गठन किया जाएगा तथा ऐसे किसी अधिकरण और ऐसे अधिकरण की सहायता के लिए नियुक्त व्यक्तियों के संबंध में उपगत सभी व्यय , सरकारी कंपनी द्वारा वहन किए आएंगे और इसी प्रकार , इस तरह निहित. उक्त भूमि में के अधिकारों के लिए या उनके संबंध में सभी विधिक कार्यवाहियों, जैसे अपील आदि की बाबत उपगत , सभी व्यथ भी सरकारी कंपनी द्वारा वहन किए जाएंगे ।

3. उक्त कंपनी , केंद्रीय सरकार या उसके पदधारियों की , ऐसे किसी अन्य व्यय के संबंध में, ओ इस प्रकार निहित उक्त भूमि में पूर्वोक्त अधिकारों के बारे में , केंद्रीय सरकार या उसके पदधारियों द्वारा या उनके विरुद्ध किन्ही कार्यवाहियों के संबंध में आवश्यक हो, क्षतिपूर्ति करेगी । 4. उक्त कंपनी को, केंद्रीय सरकार के पूर्व अनुमोदन के बिना, इस प्रकार निहित उक्त भूमि में के पूर्वोक्त अधिकार किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को अंतरित करने की शक्ति नहीं होगी ; !

5. उक्त कंपनी , ऐसे निर्देशों और शर्तों का, जो केंद्रीय सरकार द्वारा जब कभी आवश्यक हो , उक्त भूमि के विशिष्ट क्षेत्रों के लिए दिए जाएं या अधिरोपित किए जाएं, पालन करेगी ।

[फा. सं. 43015/3/2001-पीआरआईडब्ल्यू]

एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव

ORDER

New Delhi , the 31st March,2008

S.O. 819. Whereas, on the publication of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry ofCoal, Number S.O. 2577 dated the 8th October , 2004 published in the Gazette of India, Part - II , Section 3 , sub-section ( ii ), dated the16thOctober, 2004, issued under sub-section ( 1 ) ofSection 9 ofthe Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the rights to mine , quarry, bore , dig and search for , win , work and carry away minerals in the lands described in the Schedule appended to the said notification (hereinafter referred to as the said lands) vested absolutely in the Central Government free from all encumbrances under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 10 ofthe saidAct;

And, whereas, the central Government is satisfied that the Western Coalfields Limited, Nagpur (hereinafter referred to as the said Company) is willing to comply with such terms and conditions as the Central Government thinks fit to impose in this behalf;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 11 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the aforesaid rights in the said lands so vested, shall, with effect from the 16th October, 2004 instead of continuing to so vest in the Central Government, vest in the Government Company, subject to the followingterms and conditions, namely :-

1 . the said Company shall reimburse to the Central Government all payments made in respect of compensation , interest, damages and the like, as determined under the provisions of the said Act;

2 a tribunal shall be constituted for the purpose ofdetermining the amounts payable to the Central Government by the said Company under condition ( 1 ) and all expenditure incurred in connection with any such Tribunal and persons appointed to assist the Tribunal shall be bome by the said Company and similarly, all expenditure incurred in respect ofall legal proceedings like appeals, etc, for or in connection with the rights, in or over the said lands, so vesting, shall also be borne by the said Company;

3. the said Company shall indemnify the Central Government or its officials against any other expenditure that may be necessary in connection with any proceedings by or against the Central Government or its officials, regarding the aforesaid rights in the said lands so vesting;

4. the said Company shall have no power to transfer the aforesaid rights in the said lands so vested, to any other person without the previous approval of the Central Government, and

5. the said Company shall abide by such directions and conditions as may be given or imposed by the Central Government for particular areas of the said land, as and when necessary.

[F. No. 43015/3/2001-PRIW]

M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy.

1631 [भाग 1] खण्ड ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12 , 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

नईदिल्ली, 31 मार्च , 2008

का. आ. 820. - केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि इससे उपावद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित अवस्थिति को भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस क्षेत्र में कोयले के लिए पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ;

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के नक्शा रेखांक डी.जी. / 8671 तारीख 14 नवम्बर , 2007 का निरीक्षण महाप्रबंधक ( गवेषण प्रभाग ) , सेंट्रल माइन प्लानिंग एण्ड डिजाइन इंस्टीच्यूट, गोंडवाना प्लेस, कॉके रोड, रांची के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1, फाउंसिल हाकस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता के कार्यालय में या जिला कलेक्टर , जिला रायगढ़ , छतीसगढ़ के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है 1

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाली भूमि में हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चारोंऔर अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकासन की तारीख से नब्बे दिन के भीतर महाप्रबंधक ( गवेषणा प्रभाग ) , सेंट्रल माइन प्लानिंग एण्ड डिजाइन इंस्टीच्यूट , गॉदवाना प्लेस , कॉके रोड, रांची को भेजेंगे 1

अनुसूची

बिरा उत्तर पूर्व " ए" ब्लाक , भांद रायगढ़ कोयला क्षेत्र , जिला - रायगढ़ ( छतीसगढ़ )

सभी अधिकार

रेखांक से डीजी/8671 तारीख 14 नवम्बर , 2007 जिला

क्षेत्रफल

ग्राम थाना ग्राम

टिप्पणी क्र. सं

तहसील से

क्षेत्रफल (एकड़ में लगभग)

(एकड़ में लगभग)

8 1 2

793.0

जयगा

321600

321.0

भाग

रायगढ़

धरमजयगढ़

257.0

104.0

भाग धरमजयगढ़

रायगढ़

जमरगिरी

550.0

भाग वनक्षेत्र

1359.0

रायगढ़

2409.0( लगभग ) 975.0( लगभग ) कुल

सीमा वर्णन:

खा रेखा जंगल में " क " बिन्दु से आरंभ होती है , और उसी जंगल के बिन्दु " ख " पर मिलती है ।

'क-

ख-ग रेखा जबगा गांव से गुजरती हुई और जंगल को पार करने के पश्चात् जमेरी गांव के दक्षिणी भाग के " ग " किनारे पर मिलती है । ग-अ रेखा जमेरी गांव से गुजरती हुई जंगल में बिन्दु " घ " पर मिलती है ।

घ -क रेखा जंगल से गुजरती हुई और बिन्दु " क " पर मिल जाती है ।

[फा नं. 43015 /5/2008- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]

एम. शहाबुद्दीन, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 31stMarch,2008

S.O. 820. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that Coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the locality mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisitions and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957 ) (herein after referred to as the said Act), the Central Govemment hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein;

1632

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12 , 2008/CHAITRA 23, 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] Theplan number DG/ 8671 dated the 14th November, 2007 ofthe area covered by this notification can be inspected at the office ofGeneral Manager (Exploration Division) , Central Mine Planning and Design Institute , Gondwana Place, KankeRoad, Ranchi or at the office ofthe Coal Controller , 1, Council House Street, Calcutta or at the office ofthe District Collector, District Raigarh, Chattisgarh.

All persons interested in the land covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , charts and other documents referred in sub-section (7) of Section 13 of the said Act to the General Manager (Exploration Division) , Central Mine Planning andDesign Institute , Gondwana Place, Kanke Road , Ranchi within ninety days from the date ofpublication of this notification in the official Gazette.

SCHEDULE

CHIRANORTHEASTA BLOCK,

Mand Raigarh Coalfield, District Raigarh , Chhatisgarh

Plan bearing number DG/8671 dated the 14th November, 2007

All Rights

District Village

SL No.

Thana/ Tehsil

Village No.

L Jabga Dharamjaigarh 321700

Raigarh 2 Jamergiri Dharamjaigarh

Raigarh Forest

Raigarh Total

BoundaryDescription

A-B

Remarks Area in Acres (Approx)

Area in Hectares (Approx)

793.0

Part 321.0

104.0

Part 257.0

Part 550.0

1359.0

975.0

2409.0 (Approd- mately)

(Approxi mately)

The line starts at point 'A' in forest and meets points 'B ' in same forest .

B-C The line passes through village Jabga and after crossing in the forest at meets point ' C ' in the southern part ofvillage Jamergiri.

C-D The line passes through village Jamergiri and meets point ' C' in the forest .

D-A The line passes through forest and meets point 'A'.

[F.No.43015 /05/2008 -PRIW -I ] M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 4 अप्रैल , 2008

का.आ. 821 , केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्याक का.आ. 2587 जो भारत के राजपत्र, भाग II , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) , तारीख 12 सितम्बर, 2007 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , को हिंदी रूप का संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्:-

2. उपरोक्त अधिसूचना के सीमा वर्णन में -

i ) रेखा " क - छ " में, प्रविष्टि बिंदु " रुख " पर मिलती है के स्थान पर बिंदु " ख " पर मिलती है " प्रविष्टि रखी जाएगी । ii ) रेखा " ग - घ " में , प्रविष्टि बिंदु " रुम " पर मिलाती है के स्थान पर बिंदु " घ " पर मिलती है " प्रविष्टि रखी जाएगी । iii ) रेखा " घ - क" में, प्रविष्टि बिंदु " रुक " पर मिलती है के स्थान पर बिंदु " क " पर मिलती है " प्रविष्टि रखी जाएगी । [फा सं. 43015/22/2004- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]

एम. शहाबुद्दीन, अवर सचिव 1633

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[ भाग 1]-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

NewDelhi , the 4thApril , 2008

S.O.821-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) ofSection 9 ofthe Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition andDevelopment) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957), the Central Government hereby amends the English version of notification ofthe Government of India, Ministry ofCoal vide number S.O. 2587 dated the 12th September, 2007, nartiely:-

0 In the Schedule for words and figures " (Plan No- C - 1 (E ) IIL/FR/7500-407 dated the 10th April 2006)", the words and figures " (Plan No-C - 1 (E ) JIL/FR/750-407 dated the 10th April 2007 ) " shall be substituted;

Π Inthe Schedule regarding Plot numbers acquired in village Bhanegaon - for figures " 38/ 1A, 38/LB- 38/2A- 38/28-38/2" , the figures "38/1A- 38/ 1B- 38/2A- 38/2B, " shall be substituted;

Inthe Schedule regarding Boundary description

(2) On 'B-C' line, for words and figures "9, 22, 20, 17 , crosses cannel the" , the words and figures "9, 10, 22, 20, 17, 18/1-18/2- , crosses cannel then", shall be substituted;

(b) On 'D-Aline, for words and figures "Plot numbers 48, 49/1-49/2 and", the words and figures " Plot numbers 48, 49/1-49/2, 1 and", shall be substituted.

[F. No. 43015/22/2004- PRIW]

M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 4 अप्रैल , 2008

का. आ . 822, -केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 2071 तारीख 25 मई, 2006, जो भारत के राजपत्र , भाग II , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) , तारीख 27 मई , 2006 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूषि में जिसका माप 183.479 हेक्टर (लगभग ) है , कोयले का सर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी ;

और उक्त भूमि की बाबत उक्त अधिनियम की धारा ? की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन कोई सूचना नहीं दी गई ;

अतः अब , केंद्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा ? की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्त्रियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उपरोक्त अधिसूचना अर्थात् सं. का.आ. 2071 , की विधिमान्यता को, उस अवधि के रूप में 27 मई , 2008 से आरंभ होने वाली एक वर्ष की और अवधि के लिए विस्तारित करता है , जिसके भीतर केंद्रीय सरकार उक्त भूमि को या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किसी अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दे सकेगी ।

[फ. सं. 43015/10/2005-पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]

एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अंवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 4thApril,2008

S.O. 822.-Whereas by the notification of Government of India , in the Ministry of Coal, number S.O. 2071 dated 25thMay, 2006, issued under sub-section (1 ) ofSection ofthe Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development )Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) and published in Gazette of India dated the 27th May, 2006, Part II , Section 3 , Sub-section (ii) , Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in land measuring 183.479 hectares (approximately) or453.38 acres in the locality specified in the Schedule appendedthereto.

Andwhereas in respect of the said lands , no notice under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the said Act has been given.

Now, therefore , in exercise ofthe powers , conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) , the Central Government hereby extend the validity of the above notification i.e. number S.O. 2071 , for a further period of one year commencing from the 27th May, 2008 as the periodwithin which the Central Government may give notice of its intention to acquire the said lands or any rights in or over such lands.

[F. No. 43015/10/2005-PRIW -1)

M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy.

1634

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008 /CHAITRA 23 , 1930

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय,

नई दिल्ली, 7 अप्रैल , 2008

का. आ. 823.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इस में इस के पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गयी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ .2936 तारीख 04 अक्तूबर 2007 द्वारा तामिलनाडु राज्य में चेन्नई पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मनालि कि रिफैनेरी से देवनगुंदि टर्मिनल , बैगंलोर तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा सि. बि. पि. एल पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी । और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 20-12-2007 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ।

और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि ईस अधिसुचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना चाहिए ।

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसुचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ठ उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाता है ।

यहऔर कि केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि के उपयोग का अधिकार इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त से कर इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

"उपाबद्धअनुसूची"

1635

भारत का राजपत्र : मप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[ पग II-खण्प 3 ( ii ) ]

अनुसूची

राज्य : तामिलनाडु

जिला:तिरुषापुर

तालुका: वायुकोटाइ

गाँव का नाम

उप-खण्ड से.

सर्वेक्षण र्स-खण्ड से

237

93, कोष्टाकुप्यम

115

107

2ए

1ए

2बी

2ए

ए

1बी

208

2 94, आनंदनककवक्कम

208

207

उए

207

102

207

101

206

211

1 ए1सी

211

11 ए

199

३ए क्षेत्रफल

डेक्टर

वर्गमिकर

एयर

60 00

07.

15 00

40 00

85 00

67 00

30 00

60 00

44 00

40 00

16 00

39 00

30 00

94 00

00 00

94 00

63 00

00 1636

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930.

218

219

220

222

2प

222

266

2बी

266

2ए

266

272

278

उसी

278

2खी

278

1ए

278

1मी

279

1 95,माडाभिलागम

299

300

305

1बी

305

1ए

303

302

[PART I-SEC. 3 ( i)] 4

32 00

18 00

42 00

24 00

33 00

58 00

40 00

61 00

00 00

56 00

01 00

00 00

58 00

33 00

71 00

37 00

81 00

40 00

28 00

95 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

[पन ][-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) )

-3

290

2ए

290

287

267

206

266

206

266

262

268

269

289

2सी

129

78 , तिरुकांडालाम

129

2वी

129

2ए

129

128

127

111

1188 G1/08-5

1637

04.

78 00

40 00

52.

00:

01.

86 00

41 00

00 *

1638

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA23, 1930

111

110

109

2बी

108

2सी

100

उसी

100

उबी

100

उए

101

102

356

1ए

359

360

3बी1

354

३ए-

354

361

362

2ए

362

1बी

362

1सी

362

1ए2

364

[PART II-SEC. 3( fi )]

6 DO

14 00

32 00

09 00

53 00

40 00

12 00

89 00

72 00

87 00

67 00

05 00

64 00

05 00

68 00

96 00

01 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930 [ भाग II- अष्ठ 3 ( ii ) ]

369

358

5सी

367

7बी

367

371

374

2बी

1बी

374

2ए

374

1 ए

76, पेरुमुडिवक्कम

9ए1

1सी

1बी

1ए

३ए

1बी

1639

89 00

20 00

65 00.

41 00

46 00

06 00

.04

77 00

04.

41 00

25 00

43 00

00 1640.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008 /CHAITRA23 , 1930

21.

1डी

142

1ए1 ए2

1सी

1बी4

1बी3

1बी2

1बी1

1 75, आलिज्जिवक्कम

1बी

113

5बी

113

5ए

113

4बी

112

1ए2

[PART I-Sec. 3 (11) ] 4

6 00

39 00

98 00

94 00

57 00

91 00

02 00

00 00

75 00

62 00

05 00

44 1

35 00

25 00

50 00

38 00

46 00

05 00

25 00

95 00

05 00

03 00

92 00

32 00

90 00

03 00

66 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[ भाग II- शष्य 3 ( ii ) ]

111

1एफ

111

1ए

1बी

114

74, आअंगिकावानूर

114

1ए

112

8ए

5वी

112

4बी

112

4ए

111

2बी

105

2ए

105

1बी2सी

105

1बी2बी

105

1बी2ए

105

1बी1

2बी2

2बी1

2ए2

2ए1

1बी

1ए

1641

40 00

67 00

50 00

24 DO

43 00

15 00

87 00

40 00.

82 D0

66 00

30 00

05 00

62 00

34 00

03 1642

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA23 , 1930

३ए

2बी

2ए

258

257

256

252

244

2बी.

244

240

239

238

220

222

221

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

6 4

36 00

99 00

38 00

29 00

96 00

23 00

19 00

94 00

80 00

84 00

20 00

48 00

40 00

81 00

00'

08 00

16 00

06 [भाग-खष्य ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23, 1930

221

235

4ए

235

4बी

235

2 73 , पुग्नापक्कम

275

71 , मांबाल्लम

1बी

1ए

2बी

2ए

1सी

1बी

1ए

108

70, कादरभेड

111

112

1643

6 4

-00

04 00

81 00

40 00

12 00

74 00

12 00

40 00

97 00

93 00

68 DO

96 00

20 00

06 00

86 00

00 1644

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/ CHAITRA23 , 1930

4 25, मेमवेड

2बी

2ए

4ए

4मी

1सी

[PART II-SEC. 3 (1 ) ]

6 00

26 00

66 00

17 00

64 00

10 00

48 00

50 00

32 00

60 00

00 00

25 00

40 00

24 00

40 00

70 00

52 00

50 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23 , 1930

[पर II-राम ( il ) ]

110

111

1 .

113

7 .

113

122

2ऐच्

2जी

122

2एफ

122

2डी

122

2इ

122

2सी

122

2ए

122

117

134

1वी

136

1ए

135

1188 G406-B

1645

6 4

14 00

03.

00 1646

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

135

138

1सी

138

1जी

138

1डी 24,मेयुर

2ए

1सी 1

33.

1सी2

1बी1

३ए

2बी

1बी

1ए

2ए1

2बी

145

2खी

134

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 4

6 00

28 00

00 00.

26 00

08 00

68 00

-12 00

89 00

72 00

60 00

00 00

20 00

30 00

62 00

35 00

50 00

40 00

96 00

24 00

00 00

92 00

04 00

20 00

30 00

52 00

70 00

96 00

60 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23 , 1930

[ भाग II- खष्ठ 3 ( ii) ]

134

136

3बी

136

३ए 1

136

2ए2

136

2ए1

136

1ए

143

142

141

1बी2

141

1ए

168

1बी

168

189

171

172

176

177

220

222

221

217

218-

204

205

206

1647

6 4

58. 00

82 00

59 00

00.

40 00

68 00

52 00

11 00

66 00

57 00

16 00

84 00

08 00

14 00

10 00

69 00 1648

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12, 2008/ CHAITRA23, 1930

208

657

2सी

657

1जी

657

2ए

657

1एफ

3 20, कोराक्कांथाडालाम

अडी

उसी

115

21 , देबांडधक्कम

137

138

139

141

142

227

[PART JI-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 4

6 00

12 00

80 00

64 00

02 00

52 00

32 00

35 00

03 00

08.

36 &

22 00

37 00

26 00

38 00

40. 00

36 00

30 00

23 00

90 1649

भारत का राजपत्र अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[ भाग II-वाष्ठ 3 ( ii ) ]

3 1

1वी

229

ए

224

232

2बी

1बी

232

251

19, भोडाम्पाइ

1सी

2बी

2सी

सी

उए

4ए

4मी

2ए 16, आङ्कामवक्कम

1सी

1डी

2ए1 4

08 00

18 00

50 00

56 00

32 00

84 00

20 00

68.

55 00

63 00

61 00

50 00

38 00

00 1650

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008 / CHAITRA23 , 1930

24'

[PART I-SEC.

6 1

42 1डी

86 00

68 1 ए

1बी

2बी

00.

55 00

2ए1

98 00

1बी

54 00

1ए

52 00

37 00

14 5

20 4

04.

20 3

42 1

22 00

65 1ए

32 2

40 1

89 00

4ए2

4बी

90 3

09 00

5बी1

40 00

69 00

2जी

2जे

95 00

2आई

51 00

2ए

77 2

40 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[ पाम II- खष्ठ 3 ( ii ) ]

1इ

1 एफ

4जी

4ए

उबी

उसी

2बी

2ए

1सी

235

1बी

235

1ए

230

2बी

234

1जी2

230

1बी1

230

1ए2

230

231

1बी

231

1ए

229

5बी

229

5ए

1651 4

78 00

20 00

36 00

40 00

00 00

55 00

16 00

30 00

09 00

35 00

20 00

39 00

94 00

BO 00

28 00

52 00

87 00

90 00

01 1652

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/ CHAITRA23 , 1930

229

228

10बी

228

11 ए

223

213

212

201

2सी

201

202

201

2ए1

201

2बी

201

203

1ए

203

1बी

202

208

उसी

151

2सी

151

2डी

151

1 एफ

151

1जी

152

4ए

152

1ए

[PART I-SEC . 3 (ii )] 4

6 00

71 00

60 00

22 00

76 00

40 00

61 00

19 00

40 00

59 00

17 00

90 00

89 00

73 00

40 00

11 00

40 00

49 00

40 00

51 00

40 00

53 00

03 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23, 1930 [भाग 1]-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

153

1सी

173

13 , पामबक्कम

173

1ए

1बी

173

172

170

171

143

142

14मी

142

135

10बी

135

1188 G1/06-7

1653

07-

36 00

90 00

00 1654

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

135

136

127

106

107

20बी

1बी

20ए

[PART II SEC. 3(ii ) ] 4

6 00

73 00

68 00

04 00

40 00

02 00

03 00'

40 00

78 00

34 00

61 00

96 00

20 00

40 00

06 00

15 00

40 00

90 00

27 00

21 00

61 00

66 00

42 00

95 00

64 मारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

15बी

15ए

5बी

5ए

1655

40 00

68 00

00 1656

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA23 ,1930

3 12 , नयाप्पक्कम

1बी

1 ए

4बो

4ए

2ए

1सी

2सी

उसी

2ए

5बी

5ए

6बी

6ए

1बी

1सी

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ) 4

6 00

56 00

66 00

86 00

40 00

80 00

08 00

40 00

65 00

40 00

78 00

60 00

40 00

00 1657

भारत का राजपत्र अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23, 1930

[ भाग [ ]- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1 ए

188

1बी

189

1सी

189

2ए

189

2बी

189

4ए

189

4बी

189

186

223

2बी

224

2इ

224

2डी

224

213

5ए

213

4ए

213

३ए

213

1ए

1बी

213

212

217

1 ए

4सी

217

1बी

85 00

56 00

69 00

08 00

00 1658

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

217

1सी

207

205

296

1 बी

296

1 ए

295

3जी

295

3 एफ

295

उडी

295

३ए

295

258

257

268

267

266

263

261

262

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( i ) ) 4

6 00

51 00

18 00

30 00

50 00

00.

65 00

60 00

16 00

04 00

12 00

60 00

34 00

02-

88 00

32 00

.00

07.

60 00

24 00

92 00

13 00

22 00

56 00

22 00

45 1659

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[भाग II- खग्य 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्य: तामिलनाडु

जिला: तिदुवालुर

तालूका: लिनुवालुर

उप-सखण्ड से.

गाँव का नाम

सर्वेक्षण से-खण्ड़ सं

3 1

425

31 , बेंगल

425

426

11बी

428

11 ए

426

9ए

426

427

428

1ए

429

2डी

240

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मिटर हेक्टर

एयर

84 00

91 00

18 00

58 00

20:

00 1660

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008 /CHAITRA 23 , 1930

2सी1

240

2खी

240

238

237

218

216

2जे

215

205

203

202

199

193

30,सेमणेडु

4बी

4ए

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )) .

6 4

10 00

44 00

40 00

26 00

60 00

83 00

40 00

15 00

40 00

81 00

40 00

60.

80 00

08 00

28 00

00 भारत का राजपत्र अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930 [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

7सी

702

4वी

4ए

6ए

10डी

10सी

10बी

10ए

Bए

सी

हबी

6ए

1188 GUOB-8

1661

12.

'01

60 00

40 00

00 .

00 1662

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008 /CHAITRA 23 , 1930

2ए

9 आई

9 एफ

9३

9डी

सी

1ए

7 बी1 वी

7बी1टी

[PART II SEC.3 (ii)]

6 00

75 00

40 00

96 00

40 00

90 00

50 00

20 00

24 00

18 00

00 00

08 00

54 00

75 00

40 00

50 00

32 00

48 00

94 00

53 00

7 बी1 आर

7बी1 पी

7बी1 ओ 00

22 00

02 00

01 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930 [भाग 1 ] -खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

7बी1 एम

7बी1 के

7बी।डब्लू.

7बी1 आई

7बी1जे

7बी1 एफ

7बी1 जी

7बी1डी

7बी1 बी

7बी1 ए

29बी

290

2ए

169

1663

84 00

76 00

00 1664

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/ CHAITRA 23 , 1930

168

166

3डी

168

3 एफ

168

3सी

168

३३

168

111

110

112

113

106

उएफ

106

3जी

106

[PART IT-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 4

6 00

85 00

62 00

40 00

00 00

28 00

40 00

20 00

00 00

40 00

00 00

15 00

68 00

60 00

96 00

53 .00

60 00

40 00

25 00

20 00

80 00

50 00

40 00

75 00

00 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930 [प्रल -वण ( ii ) ]

106

7ए

106

107

104

४ए

104

4ची

104

4सी

104

4डी

104

4इ

104

101

४ए

101

बी

101

उसी

101

उनी

101

३ए

101

4बी

101

1बी

101

1ए

101

1665

40 00

60 00

20 00

02.

00 1666

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA23 , 1930

2सी 21, एराइयुर

2ए

1ए

1बी

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

04 00

24 00

96 00

46 00

60 00

40 00

10 00

64 00

36 00

68 00

05 00

22 00

69 00

76 00

61 00

80 00

08 00

64 00

19 00

88 00

70 00

14 00

95 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 / चैत्र 23 , 1930 [ I- खण्ड ( ii ) ]

1बी

1 ए

5बी

5ए

1डी

1सी

2बी

1बी

ए

1ए

23, विरुपाक्षर

7, सेड्रामपल्याम

2डी

1बी

1ए

1डी

1667

72 00

95 00

00 1668

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

1सी

1बी

2ए

1ए

281

4एन

281

288

286

9 एफ

286

७ऐच्

286

9 आई

307

5 एफ

307

5जी

307

5 ऐच्

307

308

1ए

304

7बी

304

7ए

304

6ए

304

12ए

304

8सी

304

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 4

6 00

18 00

78 00

29 00

68 00

01 00

02 00

75 00

40 00

65 00

96 00

80 00

87 00

47 00

36 00

60 00

50 00

77 00

01 00

36 00

96 00

50 00

40 00

40 .

40 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930 [भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

293

294

1ए

440

1 बी

440

2ए

440

1ए

441

1बी 2

442

459

३ए

459

2ए

458

1 ए

458

5बी

457

491

490

489

516

515

518

517

1188 31089

1669

06.

00 1670

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/ CHAITRA 23 , 1930

519

510

519

525

526

1जी

526

527

5ए

527

528

115, थोपुर

2पी

2ओ

2 एन

4वी

4ए

2बी

2ए

1जी

1 एफ

1 इ

1डी

1सी

1बी

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 4

55 00

00 00

88 00-

78 00

05.

37 00

48 00

22 00

50 DO

43 00

83 00

68 00

40 00

58 00

67 00

84 00

17 00

81 00

76 00

40 00

52 00

92 00

58 00

10 00

92 00

08 00

17 00

00 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

-15

1ए

1671

00.

40-

67 00

00 1672

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008 / CHAITRA23. 1930

2सी

2डी

2ए

1डी तालूका: तिदुद्यानि

6 00

88 00

32 00

08 CO

90 00

06 राज्य: तामिलनाडु

जिल्ला: तिगुवालुर

गाँव कानाम

उप-खण्ड सं.

सर्वेक्षण सं-खण्डसं

3 43, काञ्छिपाडि

4सी

4ए

क्षेत्रफान

हेक्टर

वर्गमिटर

एयर

22 00

40 00

10 00

47 00

55 00

39 00

65 00

14 00

06 00

69 00

00 00

99 00

98 00

04 00

26 भारत का राक्षपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 13. 1430 [ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( i ) ]

10सी

10बी

10ए

7बी

7ए

4बी

22ए

4ए

1673

.05

00 .

00.

09 .

01.

00 1674

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008 /CHAITRA 23 , 1930

3 42, गुलुर

3 41, पानापक्कम

12.

[PART 11- Sec . 3 (ii ) ] 4

6 00

79 00

01 00

65 00

56 00

85 00

90 00

83 00

00 00

40 00

60 00

05.

51 00

40 00

04 00

02 00

80 00

60 DO

65 00

27 00

94 00

90 00

30 00

82 00

08 00

16 00

94 भारत का राजपत्र अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23, 1930 [ भाग -खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

18ए 40, नेडाम्बरम

8वी

15बी

11सी

11बी

11 ए

1675

70 00

68 00

50-

70 00

05 00

40 00

94 00

92 00

00 1676

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008 /CHAITRA 23 , 1930

23बी

23 ए

6ए

6बी

207

35 , आरुम्बक्कम

207

202

200

7सी

205

7बी

[PART 11--SEL . 3 (

6 4

66 00

00 00

94 00

08 00

74 00

99 00

56 00

40 00

10 00

00 00

80 00

91 00

90 00

24 00

.04

60 00

42 00

18 00

05 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/ चैत्र 23. 1930 [ पाय - खण्ड ( ii ) ]

206

10खी

206

10ए

206

204

203

सी

200

212

1सी3

212

1सी2

212

1सी1

212

1बी2

212

1बी1

212

102

212

1188GI/08-10

1677

03.

00 00

60 00

00 1678

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12, 2008/ CHAITRA 23, 1930

198

36. कुप्पम

371

33, आसंगुलम

13 एफ

371

13इ

371

13डी

371

13सी

371

13बी

371

13ए

370

12बी

370

12ए

370

14सी

370

14बी

370

14ए

370

१ ए

370

बी

370

290

280

290

5ए

290

289

7सी

289

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 4

6 00

40 00

20 00

50 00

38 00

76 00

22 00

40 00

86 00

84 00

48 00

80 00

40 00

20 00

10 00

40 00

66 00

37 00

55 .00

65 00

24 00

50 00

80 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 / चैत्र 23, 1930 [ भाग -खण्ड २( ii ) ]

289

287

7 बी

267

13बी

286

13सी

286

13डी

286

1सी1

286

285

10बी

285

10ए

285

283

1679

48.

DO 1680

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008 /CHAITRA 23 , 1930

283

12ए

283

2सी2

283

2सी1

204

284

254

1 एनए

251

1बी1

251

1ए

250

244

226

223

4सी

223

4बी

223

4ए

223

221

1बी2

221

1बी1

221

1 ए

217

[PAR : Stc. ) 4

6 00

80 00

40 00

50 00

74 00

42 00

60 00

20 00

01.

88 00

00 00

40 00

00 00

80 00

00 00

40 00

.72 00

05 00

70 00

00 00

84 00

07 00

00 00

50 00

96 भारत का राजपत्र अप्रैल 12. 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930 [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2ए

8बी

14'

1सी

381

1681

40 00

36 00

04.

00 1682

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/ CHAITRA 23 , 1930

380

6 25, थालावेडू

262

5 पी

262

263

1बी2

263

1बी3

263

1ए

263

1सी

257

8ए

257

.192

192

7बी

192

7ए

192

3ए

192

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( i )) 4

6 00

50 00

01.

54 00

70 00

36 00

34 00

27 00

00 00

90 00

64 00

88 00

94 00

20 00

38 00

60 00

24 00

22 00

58 00

52 00

30 00

56 00

81 00

48 00

32 00

08 00

20 00

26 00

96 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12. 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930 [भाग - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

191

13 .

191

10डी

191

10सी

191

10बी

191

190

13सी

190

173

1683

65 00

70 00

80 00

00.

40 00

50 00

00 1684

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12, 2008 /CHAITRA 23, 1930

172

३ ए

172

2ए

171

7बी

171

7ए

171

158

1सी

158

1डी

159

3डी

159

उसी

159

1ए

160

३ए

160

10बी

10 ए

2डी3

2डी2

2सी1

2बी

2ए3

[PART 11-Sec. 3(ii ) ] 4

6 00

90 00

60 00

40 00

20 00

40 00

30 00

45 00

00 00

00.

80 00

30 00

80 00

40 00

68 00

16 00

40 00

28 00

04 00

50 00

30 00

90 00

40 00

00 00

80 00

84 00

04 00

01 00

03 भारत का राजपत्र अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[चात [ 1 - सष्ठ 3( 11 ) ]

202

146

1डी5

1डी6

1सी

6ए

4वी

4ए

उए

257

105

1188 G1/06-11

1685

80 00

94 00

00 1686

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL, 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23, 1930

3 26, पोनपाडि

201

202

200

198

199

187

186

166

186

185

184

[PART II-SEC. 3 (10) ] 4

00 00

10 00

BO 00

43 00

82 00

80 00

40 00

44 00

62 00

76 00

29 00

36 00

50 00

60 00

22 00

64 00

51 00

65 00

62 00

20 00

40 00

70 00

48 00

40 00

90 00

54 00

25 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930 [भात 11- खण्ड ( ii ) ]

184

183

161

162

1ए

1सी

162

7ए

2ए

155

17सी

145

14, आलामेलुमांगापुरम

17बी

145

1687

56 00

60 00

01.

00 00

40 00

00 1688

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12 , 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

145

4ए

145

उसी

145

2ए

149

7ए

148

7थी

140

149

148

160

150

[PART IJ-SEC . 3 ( ii) ) 4

6 00

60 00

23 00

40 00

14 00

60 00

80 00

60 00

08 00

36 00

50 00

70 00

40 00

10 00

20 00

40 00

20 00

00 00

30 00

40 00

50 00

70 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23, 1930 [भाग 1 ] - वखण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

150

9बी2

150

9ए3

150

७ए2

150

9ए1

150

274

३ए

182

13बी

188

11 बी

188

11 ए

188

12बी

188

12ए

188

185

184

2ए

1689

52 00

00 1690

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008 /CHAITRA 23 , 1930

250

251

263

259

1ए2

259

1ए1

258

257

उए

257

1सी

257

1बी

257

1 ए

16 15 , मुरुक्काप्याछु

9ए

9बी

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( 0 ) 1 4

6 00

68 00

40 00

70 00

00 00

70 00

20 00

50 00

58 00

24 00

13 00

97 00

46 00

04 00

20 00

00 00

08 00

00 00

02 00

80 00

70 00

92 00

67. 00

34 00

49 00

42 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23 , 1930 [भाग [ ]-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

11 , सुर्यानगरम

5ए

5बी

ए

1691

6 4

83 00

75 00

30 00

88 :

00 .

40 00

66 00

83 00

81 00

62 00

.00

20 00

52. 00

25 00

52 00

40 00 1692

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008 /CHAITRA 23,1930

4बी

2बी2

2ची3

214

12, क्रिष्णासमुद्रम

214

2बी

214

2ए

216

7बी

216

7ए

216

221

4इ

221

222

१ए

222

223

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii )] 4

08 00

90 00

40 00

90 00

68 00

40 00

52 00

26 00

40 00

73 00

40 00

32 00

10 00

11 00

96 00

04 00

22 00

76 00

40 00

00 00

44 00

15 00

62 00

62 भारत का राजषेत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/ 23 , 1930 [ পাল 1- खण्ड ( ii ) ]

223

324

1बी

324

42बी

224

42ए

224

225

उनी

226

225

228

सौ

228

5 एफ

228

5 इ

228

5डी

228

2वी

228

1188 G1/08-12

1695

62 00

01,

00 1694

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA:

APRIL 12, 2008/ CHAITRA 23, 1930

: 228

1 एफ

228

1 जी

228

1 इ

228

बी

228

1सी

229

5सी

229

5बी

229

5ए

229

2ए

201

200

230

199

199.

199

5बी

199

5ए

199

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 4

6 00

32 00

54 00

34 00

70 00

08 00

10 00

52 00

16 00

43 00

70 00

40 00

00 00

40 00

45 00

30 00

40 00

45 00

76. 00

80 00

88 00

24 00

13 00

60 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

11बी

231

11 ए

231

198

4बी2

198

4बी1

198

4ए

198

233

235

236

9एफ

9जी

236

9इं

236

9सी

236

७ए

236

5बी

238

237

6थी

237

1695

86.'

40 00

10 00

01.

24 00

86 00

40 00

00 1696

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA23, 1930

237

हुए

237

4सी

237

बी

237

4ए

237

2वी

237

2ए

237

161

151

बी

151

161

151

142

4बी

142

141

4ए

141

1वी

141

1ए

140

[PART II-SEC. 3 (1 ) ] 4

6 00

55 00

95 00

76 00

04 00

80 00

70 00

62 00

68 00

30 00

90 00

21 00

06 00

86 00

24 00

05.

40 00

50 00

60 00

72 00

07 00

74 00

76 भारत का रामपत्र: अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[ भाग [ 1- खण्ड ( ii ) ]

2बी

2ए

6बी

106

1697

30 00

00.

02.

03.

08 00

00 1698

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

106

105

1बी

105

104

104:

104

103

11बी

103

103'

103

7बी.

8सी

४ए

8बी

[PART -SEC. 3 (il) ] 4

6. 00

12 00

42 00

14 00

20 00

56 00

40 00

92 00

98 00

76 00

50 00

40 00

86 00

12 00

98 00

56 00

40 00

10 00

50 00

10 00

90 00

00 1699

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

उबी

३ए

2 इ

2डी

2सी

2बी

2ए

1 इ

3,सिरुगुमि

1 एफ

1सी

1बी

1ए

217

218

74 00

86 00

.02

राज्य: तामिलनाडु

जिला: तिरुवास्पुर

तालूका: पास्लिपट

उप-खण्ड सं.

सर्वेक्षण में-खण्ड से

गाँव का नाम

19, रामसमुद्द्म

3ए65

3ए64

3063

3ए62

क्षेत्रफल

वर्गमिटर हेक्टर

एघर

00 1700

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

3061

3060

३ए59

3बी

३ए32

३ए31

३ए30

3022

3021

3ए29

3ए23

3020

3ए19

3ए18

306

3ए7

३ए5

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

6 00

90 00

40 00

12 00

80 00

02 00

40 00

52 00

50 00

74 00

72 00

80 00

71 00

62 00

60 00

22 00

32 00

10 00

40 00

48 ]

184

20) क्रिष्णाराजाकुप्पम

182 00

192

188

ог

199

189

182 00

181

8ε

181

188

178

AF8

029

$29

829

129

লি28

1188 GI/DB-13

க

Est

814

art

8 6

00 1702

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23, 1930

128

1बी

128

1 ए

128

1सी

128

1डी

128

123

7ए

123

7बी

123

122

116

16बी

116

7बी

116

7सी

116

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 4

6 00

81 00

00.

60 00

50 00

00 00

40 00

62 00.

40 00

64 00

36 00

40 00

20 00

48 00

90 00

00 00 ..

32 00

51 00

14 00

56 00

44 00

68 00

40 00

70 00

52 00

48 00 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23, 1930 [भाग 1 ]- रु 3 ( ii ) ]

116

110

112

4बी

4ए

1बी

1ए

1703

50 00

00 1704

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008 /CHAITRA 23, 1930

1बी

1ए

2ए

16ए

13डी

13सी

४ए

7ए

7बी

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 4

20 00

62 00

90 00

23 00

56 00

34 00

70 00

00 00

40 00

84 00

70 00

40 00

05 00

15 00

06 00

40 00

74 00

70 00

30 00

15 00

00.

00 1930

..... भारत का राजपत्र अप्रैल 12, 2008 चैत्र 23, [भाग खण्ड 3 (1 ) ]

223

6बी

223

8बी

223

8ए

223

205

206

1705;

00 1706

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008 /CHAITRA 23 , 1930

206

207

213

212

209

12सी

209

12बी

209

12ए

209

11बी

209

11 ए

209

210

1ए

106

18 , नोचिलि

106

100

2ए

101

(PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] 4

6 00

50 00

14 00

86 00

91 00

80 00

40 00

28 00

94 00

60 00

84 00

50 00

08 00

50 00

32 00

06 00

16 00

40 00

62 00

73 00

58 00

00 00

60 00

68 00

13 00

02 00

61 00

60 00

98 1707

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

4बी

02.

10 00

73 00

60 00

50.

00 1708

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12 , 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

92 50

97 00

ΟΣ

છે SO

[PART JSC.3( ii ) ] .

€

6 00

12 00

00 00

90 00

00 00

30 00

55 00

96 00

40 [फा. सं. आर-25011 /11 /2007-ओ.आर. -1 ]

एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव те

Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas

New Delhi , the 7 April , 2008

६० S. O. 8 - Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 2936 dated the 04th October , 2007 issued under sub section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , ( herein after referred to as the said Act , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the chedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the fansportation of petroleum product from Refinery of Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited, Manali in the State of Tamil Nadu to Devanguthi Terminal , Bangalore , pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited, for implementing the Ghennai - Bangalore Pipeline Project.

And whereasocopies of the said notificatice were made available to the public from 20.12.2007;

ล ге

And whereas the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act has submitted his report to the Central Government ;

εε

ε ce And whereas, the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that the Right of User int the Land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification shouldbe acquired ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub -section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said land specifiett in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline; C

08 [ भाग II- 3 ( li ) ]

1709

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2004/ 23, 1930

And further, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section (4) of section 8 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the Right of User in the said Land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest from the date of publication of this declaration , in the Indian Oll Corporation Limited free from al encumbrances .

Schedule

State: Tamilnadu

District : Tiruvallur

Taluk : Uthukottai

Name of the Village Survey No.

Are

Hectare

Square meter

Sub-Division

No

237

93, Kottakuppam

115

107

208

94, Annadanakakavakkam

206

207

1A2

207

1A1

207

206

1A1C

211

1A1A

211

199

34 1188 GLD6-14

67.

40 :

00 1710

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008 /CHAITRA 23, 1930

218

219

220

222

266

28.

266

272

278

279

1 95, Madavilagam

299

300

-305

305

303

302

[PART II-SEC.3 ( ii) ] 4

32.

95 भारत को राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[ भाग 1 ] -खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

290

287

267

266

262

268

269

129

78, Tirukandalam

129

128

127

111

1차]

66 04

50 00

33 11

42 02

45 02

98 03

78 12

40 00

94 05

40 00

42 06

40 00

52 00

96 00

00 1712

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23, 1930

111

110

109

108

100

101

102

356

359

360

354

3B1

354

361

362

1A2

364

[PART [ 1-SEC. 3 ( ii )] 4

101

01 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23 , 1930

[भाग -3 ( ii) ]

3 1

369

368

367

371

374

6 76, Perumudivakkam

9A1

1713

63 00

40 00

06 00

'93 00

77 00

74 03

94 00

09 00

04 00

97 03

81 00

41 00

07 08

25 03

43 00

44 1714

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

1A2

1A1A2

1B4

1B3

1B2

1B1

75, Alinjivakkam

113

112

1A2

[PART II-SEC.3( )) 4

04.

56 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/ चैत्र 23 , 1930

[ भाग 1 ] - खण्ड ( ii) ]

3 1

111

114

74, Athangikavanoor

114

112

112.

112

111

105

1B2C

105

182B

105

1B2A

105

1B1

105

2B2

281

2A2

2A1

1715

{

00 .

66 00

70 00

21 03

30 00

02 07

60 00

-05 02

62 00

34 00 1716

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12, 2008 /CHAITRA 23, 1930

258

257

256

252.

244

240

239

238

220-

222

221

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 4

06 1

1717

পাদে का रामपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23, 1930

[ ग ] -खण्ड ३ ( ii ) ]

221

235

73, Punnapakkam

275

71, Mambailam

108

70, Kadarvedu

111

112

1188 GI08-15

30 06

16 00

97 00

93 00

86 00

00 1718

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12, 2008/ CHAITRA 23, 1930

25, Vembedu

PART I SEC. 3 ( ⅱ) ] 4

50 पारस का राजपत्र अप्रैल 12, 2008/ चैत्र 23, 1930.

[ [[-3( ii ) )

110

111

113

122

117

134

136

135

1719

20 03

52 03

50 00

45 00

91 00

14 04

16 11

00 05

96 00

75 00

00.

45 00

09 1720

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008 /CHAITRA 23, 1930

135

138

2A 24,Meyyur

1C1

102

1B1

2A1

145

134

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4

60 1711

भारत का राजपत्र अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

[भग II-खष्ठ 3 ( ii ) ]

134

136

3A1

136

2A2

136

2A1

136

143

142

141

1B2

141

168

169

171

172

176

177

220

222

221

217

218

204

205

206

04.

11-

69 1722

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23, 1930

208

657

3 20, Korakkanthandalam

115

21, Devandavakkam

137

138

139

141

142

227

[PART SEC. 3 (ii) ] 5

00.

01.

90 [ भाग [ ]-खण्ड

1723

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23, 1930

229

224

232

251

19, Odappai

16, Attrambakkam

2A1

66.

24 1724

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

24'

2A1

4A2

5B1

2.J

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] 4

20 00

20 00-

42 00

22 03

65 00

32 13

40 00

89 00

40 00

90 00

40 00

69 01

48 00

95 00

51 00

77 00

40 1725

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[भाग [ 1- ण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

235

230

234

182

230

181

230

1A2

230

1A1

230

231

229

1188GU08-16

30 03

95 01

89 00

35 01

20 01

39 01

40 00

94 01

83 00

28 05

81 04

00 1726

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

229

228

108

228

11A

223

213

213 .

212

201

2A2

201

2A1

201

203

202

208

151

152

[PART 11-Sec. 3 (ii ) ] 4

21 भारत का रावपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/ चैत्र 23, 1930

153

173

13, Nambakkam

173

172

170

171

143

142

14B

142

14A

142

135

108

135

1727

00:

37,

93 01

40 00

36 09

06 00

56 15

54 01

66 00

00.

88 15

31 00

OB 10

90 09

36 04

40 00

48 00

88 .00

00 1728

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008 /CHAITRA 23 , 1930

135

136

127

106

107

20B

20A

IPART SEC . 3(ii ) 4

64 भारत का राजपत्र अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[भ ][- ] ( ⅱ ) ]

15B

15A

1729

36 00

38 03

40 00

63 00

22 00

23 00

62 00 1730

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008 /CHAITRA 23, 1930

14 12, Nayappakam

[PART 1 ]-SEC . 3 (ji ))

01.

40 00

52 1731

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[ भाग II- खष्ट 3 ( ii ) ]

3 1

188

189

186

223

224

213

212

217

16 00

85 00

31 06

74 04

24 03

100

53 04

83 00

02 07

40 00

30 00

24 03

77 04

40 00

78 12

56 07

00 00

69 00

15 02

08 01

98 00 1732

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008 /CHAITRA 23 , 1930

217

207

205

296

295

258

257

268

267

266

263

261

262

[PART-Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] 4

51 00

92 00

45 1733

भारत का राजपत्र अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23, 1930

[भाम 11 - खण्ड 3 ( li ) ]

State: Tamilnadu

District : Tiruvallur

Taluk: Tiruvallur

SurveyNo.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Squaremeter

Sub-Division

No

3 1

425

31, Vengal

425

426

428

426

11B

11A

426

427

428

429

240

1188 GI08-17

26 00

60 00

40 00

07 00

40 00

58 00

10.

1734

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

240

2C1

240

238

237

216

215

205

203

202

199

193

30, Sembedu

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] 4

02 भारत का राजपत्र : औस 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

[ ग ]- ( ii ) ]

3 1

7A2

10D

10C

10B

10A

1735

32 00

25 02

10 00

'01

60 00

01 04

76 05

42 02

'00

40 00

66 00

12 03

16 00

24 00

31 00

00 1736

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/ CHAITRA 23 , 1930

19-

9B .

7B1V

7B1T

781R

7B1P

7810

[PART 1 ]-SEC. 3(ii ) ] 4

02 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12 , 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[ 1-3 ( ii ) ]

7B1M

7B1K

7B1W

7811

7B1J

7B1F

7B1G

781D

7819

701A

298

29A

169

1737

62 00

40 00

60 00

40 00

90 03

40 00

50 02

85 00

40 00

10 00

04 01

50 07

60 00

00 1738

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

168

111

110

112

113

106

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] 4

00 1739

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23, 1930

[ भाग [ ]-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

3 1

106

107

104

101

20 00

44 08

40 00

68 03

30 05

12 06

26 10

00 02

26 00

40 00

80 00

88 02

64 00

50 00

40 00

84 00 1740

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

94.

2C 21. Erraiyur

[PART I-Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] 4

1.0

00 .

95 1741

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12. 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

3 1

23, Thirupair

38.

7. Sendrayanpalyam

1188 G1/06-18

90 00

85 07

44 00

36 20

95 01

75 04

50 09

73 04

20 04

82 04

00 1742

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008/ CHAITRA 23 , 1930

261

281

291

286

307

308

304

124

304

304-

304

[PART I- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

40 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

[भाग - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

293

294

440

441

162

441

181

442

442.

459

458

457

491

490

489

516

515

518

517

1743

33 03

56 00

70 04

16 02

28 00

08 00

36 09

92 01

73 01

90 00

58 05

30 05

89 00

78 01

91 05

80 00

88 00

38 00

04.

1744

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008/CHAITRA 23, 1930

519

525

526

527

528

3 116. Thomur

62.

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 4

00.

80 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23, 1930

[ भग । खण्ड ( ii ) ]

1745

48 00

90 04

56 00

40 00

02 09

80 00

18 12

34 02

96 03

48 01

35 00

75 00

24 01

05 06

67 15

61 04

86 04

62 00

80 01

00 1746

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008 /CHAITRA 23 , 1930

81.

10. Taluk : Tiruttani

District: Tiruvallur

SurveyNo.

Name of the Village

Sub-Division No.

12 43, Kanchipadi

[PART 11- SEC. 3 ( 1) ,

State: Tamilnadu

Hectare Are Square meter 4

26 1747.

भारत का राजपत्र अप्रैल 12. 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

[ भाग [I- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

3 1

10C

10B

10A

22A

76 06

40 00

82 07

87 00

10 03

82 00

40 00

58 02

74 00

07 01

74 11

00 04

00 1748

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

18 42, Gulur

4. 41, Panapakkam

[PART 11-SEC.3 ( ii) ] 4

00.

12-

94 1749

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( i ) ]

18A 40, Nedambaram

158

110

118

11A

1188GI08-19

40 05

50 09

40 00

94 00

53 10

63 04

11 02

82 01

92 01

39 05

36 04

09 05

75 01

00 1750

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12 , 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

23B

23A

207

35. Arumbakkam

207

206

[PART -SEC.3 ( ii ) ] 5

66 00

70 00

05 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23, 1930

[ पात - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

206

10B

206

10A

206

204

203

200

212.

212

103

212

1C2

212

101

212

182

212

181

212

1A2

212

1751

84 00

04 05

50 04

00 03

75 00

50 01

70 03

05.

00 1752

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL, 12, 2008/CHAITRA23 , 1930

198

36, Kuppam

13F

371

33, Arungulam

371

13E

371

13D

371

13C

371

13B

371

13A

370

12B

370

12A

370

14C

370

14B

14A

370

290

289

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ) 4

50 .

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[ भाग 1 ] - साण्ड 3 ( ii ) )

289

287

13B

286

13C

286

13D

286

101

286

285

10B

285

10A

285

283

1753

15.

40 00

48 06

40 00

30 06

40 00

32 01

70 03

55 03

85 01

.00

00 1754

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/ CHAITRA 23 , 1930

283

124

283

2C2

283

2C1

284

254

1A1A

251

1B1

251

250

244

226

223

1 .

221

182

221

1B1

221

217

[PART 1]-SEC.3 (ii) ]

i 4

80.

96 1755

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

14'

13 .

381

12-

16 5

20.

17.

00 1756

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

380

262

25, Thalavedu

262

263

1B2

263

1B3

263

257

192

[PART I-SEC. 3 (ii)) 5

96 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 चैत्र 23 , 1930

[भाग 1 ] -खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

191

10D

191

10C

191

10B

191

190

13C

190

173

1168 GI-08-20

1757

95. 02

60 01

80 00

32 03

30 06

80 02

76 03

95 00

50 04

00 01

00.

00 1758

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

172

171

158

168

158

159

160

3日

10B

10A

2D3

2D2

201

2A3

[PART II SBC. 3 (ii ) ] 4

00.

72 भारत की राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23, 1930

[भाग 11- अण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2A2

1E'S

1D5

106

4A1A

267

1 .

105

1759

18 03

84 00

80 01

46 08

26 08

82 00

36 03

40 00

06 09

20 00

16 00

45 00

09 1760

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

201

26. Ponpadi

202

200

198

199

187

186

188

186

185

184

[PART I-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 4

00 .

65. 00

25 1761:

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23, 1930

[ भाग ] -खण्ड ( i ) ]

3 1

184

183

161

162

153

154

150

155

17C

145

14, Alamelumangapuram

17B

145

84 00

75 00

70 01

00 00

40 00

68 00

12 01

00 1762

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA23 , 1930

145

149

150

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( 8 ) ].

70 1763

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

[भाग 1 ] -শুপ্ত ( ⅱ ) ]

150

9B2

150

9A3

9A2

150

9A1

150

274

182

13B

188

11B

188

11A

188

12B

188

12A

188

185

184

30 04

40 00

55 01

72 08

10 01

90 00

72 00

52 00

68 00

42 00

80 00

01 1764

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23, 1930

250

251

263

1A2

259

1A1

259

258

257

15, Murukkampattu

: 15

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii) )

70 05

67 00

52 00

34 11

42 00

03 1765

भारत का राजपत्र अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23 , 1930

[भग 11- खण्फ 3 ( ii ) ]

3 1

11, Suryanagaram

4A 1188 GL/06-21

40-

40 00

00 1766

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23, 1930

2B2

2B3

214

12, Krishnasamudram

214

216

221

222

223

[PART -Sec. 3 ( ii )] 4

07-

62 भारत का राजपत्र अप्रैल 12 , 2008 /चैत्र 23 , 1930

[ भाग [ ]-खण्ड ( ii ) ]

223

324

428

224

42A

224

225

228

1767

40 00

50 01

50 00

75 01

62 01

14 04

10 00

06 03

94 05

52 02

94 05

34 02

12 00

92 00

50 00

00 1768

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008 /CHAITRA 23 , 1930

228

229

228

229

201

200

230

199

[PART I-SEC. 3 (ii)] 4

80 1769

भारत का राजपत्र अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[भाग II- सभ्य 3 ( ii) ]

3 1

11B

231

11A

231

198

4B2

198

4B1

198

233

235

5 .

235

236

238

237

00 00

06 00

06 03

40 00

10 00

40 05

80 00

24 03

65 01

40 00

78 03

86 00

14 00

00 09

40 00

82 02 1770

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12,2008/ CHAITRA23 , 1930

237

151

142

141

140

[PART I-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4

76 1771

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

106

00 .

10 03

27 01

90 03

50 01

24 00

80 00

86 02.

40 00

50 04

60 03

78 00

80 02

40 00

50 04

65 00

94 05

12 06

03 04

55 01

08 04

04 00

00 1772

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA23 , 1930

106

105

106

105

104

104;

104

103

11B

103

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 4

10.

20 1773

पारत की एवपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23, 1930

1E 3, Sirugumi

217

218

-00

44 00

60 00

96 15

92 00

63 11

06 03

00 .

State: Tamilnadu

District: Tiruvallur

Taluk : Pallipat

SurveyNo.

Name of the Village

Sub-Division No.

3 19 , Ramasamudram

3465

3A64

3A63

3A62 1188 GW08-22

Are

Hectare

Square meter

20 00

62 00

35 00

10 1774

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

3461

3460

3A59

3A32

3A31

3A30

3422

3A21

3A29

3A23

3A20

3A19

3A18

346

3A7

3A5

[PART II-SBC. 3 (ii ) ] 4

_00

48 1775

परत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

[ भाग ॥- साष्ट 3 ( ii ) ]

182

20, Krishnarajakuppam

182

181

178

129

128

00.

44 00

47 10

40 05

40 00

22 05

94 00

34 01

50 00

26 00

86 13

40 00

65 00

60 03

00 1776

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008 /CHAITRA 23 , 1930

128

123

122

116

168

116

118

116

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ⅱ) ) 4

00.

01.

48 1777

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

[ भाग - वष्ट ( ii ) ]

3 1

116

110

112

40. 00

66 06

14 00

10 00

86 04

26 00

36 12

67 02

05 00

82 00

08 1778

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008 /CHAITRA 23, 1930

16A

13D

13C

[PART IISEC. 3 (ii ) ] 4

47 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[ भाग ॥ धन्य 3 ( ⅱ) ]

3 1

223

205

1779 5

50 01

40 00

50 03

00 1780

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12, 2008 /CHAITRA 23, 1930

205

206

706

207

213

212

209

210

106 16, Nochili

106

100

[PART 1 ]-SEC . 3 ( it) ]

5 00

50.

12C

12B

12A

11B

11A

11 1781

भारंत बम राजपत्र अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

[ भाग II- अष्ठ 3 ( ii ) ]

100

८

100

101

1188 G108-23 1782

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/ CHAITRA23 , 1930

[PART II SEC.3 (ii) ] 4

[F. No. R-25011 /11 /2007-0.R. - 1 S.K. CHITKARA, Under Secy.

1783 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12 , 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

[ भाग ॥ खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :-

SCHEDULE

श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 12 मार्च , 2008

"Whether the action of the management of BCCL Sudamdih Shaft Mine in changing date of birth , originally recorded as 1-7-58 to 24-7-48 without referring the case of Apex Medical Board is justified? If not, to what relief is the workman Srikant Gareri entitled?"

का.आ. 824. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैं. बी. सी. सी. एल . के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय संरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण ( सं.- 1 ) धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 128/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-03-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/8/2001 - आई आर ( सो-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जंबास , डेस्क अधिकारी

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT New Delhi, the 12th March , 2008

After having received the Order No. L-20012/8/2001- IR(Coal - 1) dated 22-05-2001 of the aforesaid reference from the Govt . of India , Ministry of Lobour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute a reference case No. 128 of 2001 was registered on 20-6-2001 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notice through the registered post to the parties concerned directing them to appear in the Court on the date fixed and file their writen statement alongwith the relevant document and a list of witnesses in support of their claim. In compliance of the said order notices were issued to the parties concerned Sri S. N. Goswami , Advocate of the union appeared in the Court to represent the union.

8.О. 824.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 128/ 2001) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, (No - 1 ) Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s B.C.C.L. , and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 12-03-2008.

[No. L-20012/8/2001-4R (C- 1 )] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 1 ) DHANBAD

In the matter ofa reference under section 10( 1 ) (d) (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 .

Reference No. 128 of2001

From the perusal of the order sheet of the record it transpires that both the parties have filed their written statements in support of their claim. It is further clear from the record that the case was fixed for filing of rejoinder& documentby parties but a petition alongwith a Zerox copy ofdeath certificate of workman has been filed in the Court praying there in to pass a NO DISPUTE AWARD. It is obvious from the record and it is also clear from the death certificate granted by the competent authority that . Sri Srikant Gareri the workman concerned died on30-6-07 andthis fact was informed by the petition of the Advocate. The petitioner has mentioned in the application that the family do not want to contest the case further any more since this reference is pending, they have not rceived the retiral benefit . Inthe prevailing facts and circumstances of the case it is not advisable to keep the record pending any more. As such it is hear by

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Sudamdih Shaft Mine of M/s . B.C.C.L.

ORDERED

and

Their workman

Present:- Shri Nagendra Kumar, Presiding Officer

Appearances:-

That let a "NO DISPUTE " Award be made and the same is passed. Send the copies ofthe Award to theGovt. of India, Ministry ofLabour & Employment, New Delhi for information and needful . Reference is accordingly disposed of. NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer For the Management : - None

For the Workman : - Shri S.N. Goswami , Advocate

नई दिल्ली , 17 मार्च , 2008

State: Jharkhand .

Industry: Coal

Dated, 26th February, 2008

AWARD

का.आ. 825. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार फेडरल बैंक लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , इरनाकूलम के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 49/2006) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17-03-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था। By order No. L-20012/8 /2001 - IR ( Coal - 1 ) dated 22-05-2001 the Central Govemment in the Ministry of Labour has in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) ofsub-section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A) ofSection 10 of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , referred the following

[सं. एल-12012/290/2004-आई आर(बी-I ) ] अजय कुमार , देस्क अधिकारी 1784

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

[PART I-SEC. 3 (ii) ] New Delhi , the 17th March , 2008

workman challenged the findings and punishment. According to him he was not given sufficient opportunity todefend .He was not given notice ofenquiry . The enquiry washeld ex parte , The findings are perverse.

S.O. 825. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref, No.49/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -curn -Labour Court, Ernakulam , as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Fedral Bank Ltd. , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 17-3-2008 .

[No. L- 12012/290/2004- IR (B- 1 ) ]

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM

Present: SHRI P.L. NORBERT, BA , LL.B. , Presiding Officer

(Thrusday the30th day ofAugust, 2007/8th Bhadrapada, 1929)

I.D. 49 of2006

(1.D. 1/2005 of Industrial Tribunal Alapuzha)

Workinan : Shri GeorgeThomas Kurisummoottil House Slamepuram, PathanapuramP.O. Kollam District Adv . Shri Ashok B. Shenoy.

Management ; The Dy.GeneralManager Canara Bank, CircleOffice , Staff Section (N) Spencer Junction Thiruvananthapuram

Adv. M/s . B.S. Krishnan Associates

AWARD

3.According to the management , notice of enquiry was given to the workman . He was afforded sufficient opportunity to participate in the enquiry. But he remained absent . Copy ofproceedings ofenquiry held on 9-11-2001 was forwarded to him by the Enquiry Officer. He was offered a chance to cross -examine the management withnesses . That was also not availed by the workman . Again the Enquiry Officer sent a copy of Enquiry Report to the workman. On the basis of the materials collected by the Enquiry Officer he came to the conclusion that the workman was guilty of the charges . The Disciplinary Authority. analyzing the evidence and the report, concured with the findings of Enquiry Officer . The workman was given opportunity for personal hearing and thereafter imposed punishment ofdismisal . No illegality is committed either by Enquiry Officer or by the Disciplinary Authority. The workman remained absent unauthorisedly without intimation from 3-4-2001 to 12-4-2001 and again from 17-4-2001 to 7-8-2001 . Heborrowed money from customers and well -wishers and persuaded customers and others to stand guarantee for him and his family members for loan purpose . He also issued cheques without keeping sufficient balance in the account. The past record of the workman is bad . For similar misconduct disciplinary action was initiated twice and punishment of reduction of basic payby two stages and stoppage of increment for six months were imposed on him . Still he made no improvements . He has violated Leave Rules as well as provisions ofBipartite Settlement. His conduct is prejudicial to the interest ofthe bank and affects the reputation of the bank. The findings are based on materials and the punishment is in proportion to the charges , Therefore no interference in the findings or punistunent is called for,

This is a reference made by Central Govemment under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 for adjudication . The reference is:-

4.Since the validity of enquiry is challenged by the workman that issue was heard as a preliminary issue and an order was passed on 17-8-2007 finding that the enquiry isvalid. What remains to be considered are:-

(1 ) Whether the findings of Enquiry Officer are sustainable?

"Whether the action ofthe management of the Federal Bank Ltd. with headquarters at Alwaye Kerala in dismissing Shri George Thomas, ex -Clerk-Typist of the Koodal Branch vide order No. PIR/ M3 /P/2266/ AW-276/R-242/2002 dated 9-3-2002 is justified? If not, towhat relief Shri George Thomas is entitled?"

(2) Whether the punishment is proper?

2. The facts ofthe case in brief are as follows:-

Theevidence consists of the oral testimony ofMW1 and documentary evidence of Ext . MI on the side of management and WWI and Exts . Wito W14 on the side of theworkman.

5.Point No. (1)

Thereare two charges . The 1st charge is Ext . ME-4 dated 7-8-2001 and the 2nd charge is Ext . ME- 7 dated 1-11-2001. As per the Ist charge the allegation is that the workman remained absent continuously without applying for leave and without intimation from 3-4-2001 to 12-4-2001 The workman , Shri George Thomas was a Typist- Clerk in Federal Bank. Two charge-sheets were issued to him on the allegation of unauthorized absence without intimation , borrowing money from customers of the bank, persuading customers and well -wishers to stand guaranty for him and his family members for availing loans and issuing cheques to several persons without maintaining sufficient balance in the account of the workman . A domestic enquiry was conducted and he was found guilty of. all the charges and was dismissed from service. ,The 1785 [भाग II-खण्ड 3(i) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23, 1930

and again from 17-4-2001 to 7-8-2001 .As per the 2nd charge the allegations are that he borrowed money from customers andwell-wishers . He persuaded customers and well -wishers to stand guranty for him and his family members . He took possession of a cheque book clandestinely from the bank and issued cheques to creditors without keeping sufficient balance in his account .

duty due to some personal matters he wanted leave for another six months. Ext . W- 13( d ) is the postal receipt of having sent Ext. ME- 13 (a) to the bank. Ext . W- 13 (b) is another similar letter dated 25-1-2002 stating that itwas in continuation ofhis letter dated 28-7-2001 that he was writing for extension ofleave for another 3 months from 25-1-2002 onwards , thus it can be seen from Exts . W- 12, 12(a) , 13(a) and 13 (d) that the workman had intimated the bank that her would be absent. However he had not applied for leave except for the period from 3-4-2001 to 12-4-2001 . Therefore theabsence at any date from 17-4-2001 to 7-8-2001 is clearly unauthorized absence as found by the enquiry officer.Bul the finding that it was without intimation to the bank is not correct. To that extent the finding of the Enquiry Officel has to be modified . A mere unauthorized absence is only a minor misconduct as already mentioned.

7. The other charges against the workman are borrowing money from customers and others , persuading customers and well -wishers to stand guaranty for him and issuing cheques without keeping sufficient balance in biş account .

8. As per the charge the workman hadborrowed Rs.50,000 from Smt. Kumjamma Thomas ofPathanapигаси and Rs . 10,000 from Shri K.P. Paulose, a retired Sub- Inspector of Police , Pathanapuram . A loan was taken by Shri Ramakrishnan, Chevayur , Calicut pledging 400 units ofUT1-64 . The loan amount was repaid . But the UTI units were not returned . Shri C. Abraham of Punalur was persuaded to stand as a guarantor for workman . So also, Fr. O. Thomas of Pathanamthitta stood as surety for aloan of Rs. One lakh availed by the workman from bank and salary of Fr. Thomas, who was a High School Teacher, was deducted towards repayment of the loan amount. It was contended by the learned counsel for the workman that none of these persons , except one ( Shri K.P. Paulose, a retired Sub- Inspector ) are customers of the bank. The amount borrowed from him was only Rs. 10.000. Therefore, according to him, the conduct of the workman in borrowing money has neither affected the reputation of the bank nor is it prejudicial to the interest of the bank. It is to be noted that Bank's Bulletin No. 27/97, Part IV dated 2-7-1997 prohibits borrowing money from customers. Enquiry Report refers to the Bulletin (Pg. 3). Even if the workman had borrowed money only from one customer, that was enough violation of the instructions of the bank and hence misconduct . Shri Paulose was examined as MW2. He supported the charge ofhaving borrowed money from him and received a cheque which was dishonoured. Anothar creditor, Smt . Kunjamma Thomas , was also examined as MW3 . She too stated that the workman had borrowed Rs. 50,000 from her and issued a cheque which was dishonoured. Regarding guarantors the Branch Manager ofthe Bank (MW ) ) bad given evidence before Enquiry Officer that theworkman had requested Shri M.C. Abraham to stand as a guarantor . Fr. O. Thomas too stood as 6. So far as the 1st charge is concerned it is contended by the learned counsel for the workman that intimation was given to the bank regarding the absence . Therefore, according to him , if at all the absence is treated as unauthorized it is only a minor misconduct . There is no quarrel that unauthorized absence with intimation is only a minor misconduct and unauthorised absence without intimation , is gross misconduct falling within Clause 7(a) and 5 (p) respectively of the 7th Supplementary Bipartite Seulement dated 10-4-2002 (Ref. page 567 ' Bipartite Settlements ' by H.P.J. Kapoor , 12th Edition) . Therefore the pertinent question is whether intimation was given or not. According to the workman the reason for his long absence is his illness. The workman (WWI ) says that in 1986 he had met with an accident and fractured his leg. A metal rod was implanted in his leg. There was metallic infection. Hence he was unable to attend duty from 17-4-2001 onwards .The absence priorto that is, from 3-4-2001 to 12-4-2001 , for 10 days.Hehadworked thereafter last on 16-4-2001 . According to the management the intimation about his absence from 3-4-2001 to 12-4-2001 alone was given as revealed byExt. ME- 11 to 16 & 18, ME- 11 is a leave application in the prescribed format dated 16-4-2001. The leave applied was for 10 days from 3-4-2001 to 12-4-2001. Thereafter he joined duty.Againfrom 17-4-2001 he was absent . Ext. ME- 12 is a coveringletter forwarding Ext. ME- 11 application to the Asstt. General Manager. Ext . ME- 13 is Fitness Certificate from St. John's Hospital , Pathanapuram stating that he was fit for resuming duty from 13-4-2001 . Ext . ME- 14- isa medical certificate dated 3-4-2001 advising 10 days' rest from 3-4-2001 onwards . Ext . ME- 15 is an intimation letter dated 17-4-2001 regarding absence . Ext . ME - 16 is another medical certificate dated 17-4-2001 stating that the workman requires further treatment. Ext . ME - 18 dated 14-7-2001 is a letter of intimation to the bank stating that the workman had not fully recovered from his illness and the doctor had advised him rest for 3 more weeks as per medical certificate dated 12-6-2001 and hence he was unable to report for duty. The management however does notadmit receipt of medical certificate dated 12-6-2001 . Ext. W12 producedby the workman before this Court is a copy of that medical certificate dated 12-6-2001 . Ext. W- 12 ( a) is postal receipt of having sent Ext . W- 12 medical certificate to the bank. Hence the bank cannot say now that they did not receive medical certificate dated 12-6-2001 . As per that medical certificate theworkman was advised rest for 3 weeks from 11-6-2001 . Ext. W- 13 (a) is a letter of intimation dated 28-7-2001 sent to the bank stating that though he was fit for reporting for 1786

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3( it)]

ofdoing an act prejudicial to the interest ofthe bank, major punishment of dismissal was ordered by the disciplinary authority and for reasons stated above it calls for no interference.

11. In the light ofthe reasons stated above, an award is passed finding that the action of the management of Federal Bank in dismissing Shri George Thomas from service is legal and justified and he is not entitled for any relief. The parties will suffer their respective costs. The award will take effect one month after its publication in the official Gazette.

Dictated to the Personal Assistant , transcribed and typedbyher, corrected and passed by me on this the 30th day ofAugust, 2007,

P. L. NORBERT, Presiding Officer APPENDIX

Witness forthe Workman WW1 -Shri George Thomas 13-3-2007. Witness for theManagement : MW1 -Shri Syriac Joseph - 14-11-2006. Exhibits for the Workman:

guarantor, MWI also stated that the UT! units pledgedby Shri Ramakrishnan for taking a loan from the bank was not returned after repayment of the loan-Besides , documents produced before the Enquiry Officer also support the case of the management . On the basis of the oral and documentary evidence the Enquiry Officer found that the allegation, ofborrowing and securing guarantors for loans availed by workman and his family members , is true . The workonan had also issued cheques to the creditors. The cheque book facility was withdrawn by the bank from the workman due to his indiscriminate borrowing . It was thereafter that the workman had clandestinely took a cheque book from the bank and issued cheques to borrowers. Ext.. ME-9 is copy of a blank cheque signed by the workman . He is not able to explain how he came in possession of the eheque leaf. The cheques when presented by the creditors were dishonoured . It may be true that out of the creditors there is only one customer of the bank. But that will not lighten the gravity of the misconduct. Indiscriminate borrowing by an employee of the bank is bound to tell upon the credibility of the bank. Persuading people by a bank employee to stand as surety and default on his part to repay the loan, affects the reputation of the bank and consequently it is prejudicial to the interest of the bank.

WI series -Electricity bills issued to Consumer No. 741 (7Nos).

W2 -Copy of letter dated 28-5-2002 sent by the workman to the Supdt , Postal Division , Kollam .

W3 -Letter dated4-6-2002 issued by Customer Care Centre, Deptt . of Posts, Kollamto the workman .

W4 -Letter dated 8-6-2002 issued by the management to the workman.

-Letter dated 12-6-2002 issued by Customer Care Centre, Deptt. ofPosts, Pathanaригaт.

W6 -Photostat copy of letter dated 20-6-2002 sent by the workman to the Chief Manager, P & IR Deptt. of the management.

W6(a) -Postal receipt.

9. The workman does not have a past good record. He was in the habit of indiscriminate borrowing , absenteeism and incurring debts beyond his means of repayment . Ext . ME-31 and 32 are records of disciplinary proceedings on two previous occasions for similar misconduct of absenteeism and borrowing . The punishments imposed are reduction of basic pay by two stage and stoppage of increment for six months . However, there appears to be no ray of improvement in the conduct of the workman. Repetition of the same misconduct unmindful of the consequences, has led him to the present disciplinary action. The bank cannot tolerate such persons. he has dug his own grave and has to beat his own breast. Inthe circumstances the employer cannot be expected to clamp a lesser punishment than what is ordered and the same is in no way harsh or hard.

W7 -Copy of letter dated 8-7-2002 sent by the workman to the Chief Manager, P & IR Deptt. ofthe management

W7(a) . -Postal receipt.

W8 -Photostat copy of Medical Certificate dated 3-4-2001 .

W9 -Photostat copy of Medical Certificate dated 1-5-2001.

W9(a) -Postal receipt dated 2-5-2001 in río letter sent under Certificate ofPosting by workman,

₩10 -Photostat copy of Medical Certificate dated 45-2001 .

-Discharge summary issued from St. Joseph's Hospital , Pathanapuram in r/ o Shri George Thomas, the workman .

10. As per the charge, the misconduct ofremaining absent without intimation continuously for a period exceeding 30 days , falls under Clause 5 ( p) of 7th SupplementaryBipartite Settlement , doing an act prejudicial to the interest of the bank under Clause 5 (j ) , absence without leave under Clause 7(a) and incurring debts to an extent considered by the management as excessive under Clause 7 (1 ) . The first two are gross misconduct and the last two are minor misconduct . I have already found that the unauthorized absence is with intimation and therefore it is only a minor misconduct . However, borrowing money from customers and others is an act which is prejudicial to the interest of the bank and it is a major misconduct . Unauthorized absence is also a minor misconduct . These are the charges that are proved . For the gross misconduct 1787

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

[भाग II खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

W12 -Photostat copy of Medical Certificate dated 12-5-2001.

W13 -Postal receipt dated 13-5-2001 in río letter sent Under Certificate of Posting by workman.

W13(a) -Copy of letter dated 28-7-2001 sent by the workman to the Branch Manager, Federal Bank, Koodal Branch .

W13 (b) Copy of letter dated 25-1-2002 sent by the workman to the Branch Manager , Federal Bank, Koodal Branch .

W13 (c)to(c) -Postal receipt of letter sent Under Certificate ofPosting by the workman.

W14 -Copy of letter dated 5-12-2001 sent by the workman to the management .

Exibitforthe Management:

-Enquiry File. M1 नई दिल्ली , 18 मार्च , 2008

का.आ. 826. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण गोदावरीखनी के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 122/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-03-08 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -22013/1 /2008- आई आर ( सी-11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi, the 18th March, 2008

S.O. 826. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 122/ 2005) of the industrial Tribunal, Godavarikhani as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of SCCL and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 18-3-2008.

[No. L-22013/ 1 /2008- IR (C- II)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, DeskOfficer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, GODAVARIKHANI

PRESENT: Sri . M. Shanmugam, B. Com. , B.L., Chairman -cum-PresidingOfficer

Wednesday, the 20th Day ofFebruary, 2008 Industrial Dispute No. 122 of 2005.

Between:

:Petitioner.

K. Rajeshwar Rao, S/o .Chandraiah , Aged about 50 years, E.C.No.0813372, Ex-Coal Cutter, H.No.19-6-340, Laxminagar , PO : Godavarikhani, Dist.Karimnagar-505209(AP). And

:Respondents.

1. The Supdt . , ofMines, GDK. No. 3 Incline, Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd., RG-1 , PO: Godavarikhani, Dist. Karimnagar.

2. The General Manager, Singareni Collieries Co.Ltd. , RG-I, PO: Godavarikhani, Dist. Karimnagar .

3. The Chairman & Managing Director, Singareni Collieries Co.Ltd . , PO: Kothagudem, Dist. Khammam.

This Industrial Dispute petition U/Sec. 2- A (2) of 1.D. , Act, coming on before me for final bearing on21-01- 2008, upon perusing all the documents on record and upen hearing the arguments of Sri K. Sudhakar Reddy, Advocate , for the petitioner and Sri D. Krishna Murthy, Standing Counsel for the respondents , having stood over for consideration till this date, the court passed the following:

AWARD

1. This petition is filed U/Sec . 2 -A(2) of I.D.Act, by the petitioner, the petitioner , Ex-Coal Cutter prays this Court to set aside the dismissal order dt. 14-10-2004 passed by the 2nd respondent and direct the respondents' compаву to reinstate the petitioner into service, with continuity of service, all other consequential benefits and full backwages , to meet the ends ofjustice.

2. The averments of the petition filed by the petitioner are as follows:

The petitioner/workman hereby humbly submits that he was appointed as Badli Worker in the respondents ' company in the year 1975. In the year 1977, the petitioner was promoted as Coal Cutter and his services were confirmed. From the year 1986 to till 2000, the respondents' authorities utilized his services as Acting Clerk, Man way Clerk, Magazine Clerk, Welfare Section, stores in the office and also as Chit Issuing clerk in the Area Hospital . In the year 2001 , the petitioner was again posted as coal cutter under the 1st respondent. Ever since his appointment in theyear 1975 , the petitioner discharged his duties to utmost satisfaction ofhis superiors without any kind blemish and 1788

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

[PART II Sec. 3( i) ) has put up250 to 300 musters and above for several years. He served the respondents company for more than29 years i.e. , three decades.

authorities assured their regularization of services and instructed then to withdraw the W.P. before the Hon'ble A. P. High Court . Accordingly, the petitioner withdrew the W.P. , and also appeared for the interviews on 27-5-98 and 4-11-98. But, unjustly he was not regularized as acting clerk though his services were utilized as clerk from 1986 to 2000. In the year 2001 , the petitioner was again posted as coal cutter under the Ist respondent. Thus , the respondents company deliberately suffered the petitioner physically, mentally and financially. This is the roote cause for the entire unfortunate happenings. Even then the petitioner worked hard in the under ground during 2001 ( from June 2001 10 December 2001 ) for 113 days , during 2002 for 159 days and during2003 for 96 days physical musters . Further , he was granted LL TC availment for 8 days during May 2003. Thus , the alleged short of4 musters for the required minimum 100 musters is an utter false.

3. That in the year 2001 i.e. , after 15 years service as clerk, he was again posted a coal cutter under the Ist respondent . The respondents again directed the petitioner to work as coal cutter in the under ground, which is very strenuous in nature. It affected his health very badly and he suffered from serious ill health, chronic back pain and jointpains to his knees etc. Even then, he worked for more than the required minimum 100 musters in 2001 and2002. During the year 2003 , his health further deteriorated and the petitioner was constrained to take treatment frequently. Due to illness, he was not in a position to attend his duties regularly and he was confined to bed . But the 1st respondent issued charge sheetdt.22-2-2004 alleging that he has put in only 96 days of attendance during the year 2003, as under :

5. But the respondents ' company got conducted a farce of domestic enquiry in an eye wash manner . The petitioner was not at all given opportunity to cross examine the management witness . He was denied fair opportunity to defend himself during the alleged domestic enquiry. Even the basic principles of natural justice were not followed. The findings of the enquiry officer are biased and perverse. The enquiry officer not at all considered the true facts.This court may be pleased to declare the domestic enquiry as invalid and vitiated , as a preliminary point . That the 2nd respondent failed to call for the objections and comments of the petitioner on the enquiry report and proceedings , straight away, show cause notice was issued and late dismissed the petitioner from service , vide office order dt . 14-10-2004. It is highly arbitrary , unjust and illegal . It cannot be sustained under law .

"C.S.O.No.25.25 ; Habitual late attendance or habitual absence from duty without cause " . That his explanation to the said charge sheet on 27-05-2004 along with medical certificates . The respondents condoned the absence of the petitioner and took the petitioner into service. The petitioner attended to duties under the Ist respondent in the year 2004 also , duly taking treatment. That the petitioner underwent treatment in the company's hospitals and other private/Govt. hospitals also . The petitioner's old aged ailing parents also suffered from ill health very seriously. Further , his wife also fell seriously ill and suffered from abdomen ulcer in 2003. She under went major surgery and the petitionerwas compelled to take care ofhis wife and parents also. He is the sole member who has to look after them. Thus there is reasonable and sufficient cause for the alleged absence of the petitioner . It is not at all a habitual one nor deliberate . His personal treatment , prolonged treatment to his parents and wife are inevitable and beyond the control of the petitioner. His previous attendance for more than 2½ decades proves the punctually and loyalty of the petitioner to his duties .

4. That the respondents ' authorities granted LL TC to the petitioner to go to Rajura of Chandrapur Dist. , Maharashtra State, which was availed by the petitioner from 18-05-2003 to 25-05-2003 . He was granted leave with pay and was paid LL TC by the company, but surprisingly this entire period was also shown as absent. The total paid National Holidays and weekly holidays of2003 were also unjustly shown as absent. 31st of April , June and November 2003 were shown as absent. All these things clearlyprove the unfair labour practices of the respondents' authorities . That from the year 1986 to till 2000 , the respondents ' authorities utilized his services as Acting Clerk, Man way clerk, Magazine Clerk, Welfare Section, Stores in the office and also as chit issuing clerk in the area hospital . The petitioner requested the respondents to regularize services as acting clerks . The respondents'

6. Further, the extreme and capital punishment of dismissal imposedby the 2nd respondent on the petitioner is highly excessive and shockingly disproportionate to the alleged charge for the short of 4 musters during 2003. It is not at all commensurate and amounts to economic death of the petitioner. He served the company from 1975 to 2004 i.e. , for more than 29 years without any blemish . Nowhe is aged about 50 years and has got only few years of service. He spent huge ammounts for his treatment, treatment of his parents and wife , by obtaining loans. That the petitioner hails from a very poor family and has no other source of income, except thisjob. He is the sole bread winner for his entire large family. He has to feed his ailing old aged parents , wifeand children , due to the unjust dismissal from service by the respondents ' company vide office orderdt.14-10- 2004, they are thrown on the streets . The petitioner is facing lot ofhardship and mental agony. Ever since his dismissal from service, the petitioner remained unemployed and could not get any otherjob inspite of his best efforts . That this court has got every jurisdiction to adjudicate this case andwide powers vested U / s , 11 -A of I.D. Act , to quash the dismissal order. It is prayed that this Court may be pleased 1789

भारत की राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

[भाग 11-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

to set aside the dismissal order dt. 14-10-2004 passed by the 2nd respondent and direct the respondents' company to reinstate the petitioner into service, with sontibulty of service, all other consequential benefits and full backwages, to meet the ends ofjustice.

9. That the petitioner has remained absent on a number of days without leave, sick or without sufficient cause during the year 2003 and he had put in only 96 musters during the year 2003. As such he was issued with a charge sheet No.RG.1 /GDK.3/007 /411 , dt.22-2-2004 under company's standing orders No.25.25 which reads as follows:-

7. The averments of the counter filed by the respondent are as follows:-

"25,25: Habitual late attendance or habitual absence from duty without sufficient cause".

That respondent at the outset denied all the material allegations of the petitioner except those which are specifically admitted herein. That it is a Government Company incorporated under the provisions of Compatties Act, 1956 for carrying out the business of winning attd selling the coal . That since the coal winning industry is a central subject the appropriate Government for this respondent management is Central Government. That as per S.7A( 1 ) of 1.D. Act, the appropriate Government may by notification in the Official Gazette constitute one or more industrial tribunals for the adjudication of industrial disputes relating to any matter whether specified in the 2ndschedule or 3rd schedule and for performing such other functions as may be assigned to them under this Act. That Central Government established an Industrial Tribunal-cum- LabourCourt atHyderabad fruth 29-12-2000 for adjudication of industrial disputes and the petitioner ought to have approached the said tribunal for the redressal of grievance , ifany. But the petitioner conveniently avoided to file his pedition before the tribunal established by the Central Government for the reasons best known to him. That the petition is not maintainable under law and the same may be dismissed on this ground alone.

Hewas advisedto submit explanation within four days of receipt of the charge sheet. He has received the charge sheet butdid not submit any explanation. He did not inform regarding his ill -health to his superior or to the office ofthe GDK.No.3 Incline . The averment of the petitioner that he submitted his explanation to the said charge sheet dt. 27-5-2004 along with medical certificates is denied and the petitioner is put to strict proof of the same. The contention of the petitioner that the respondents condoned the absence ofthe petitioner and took the petitioner into service is not correct. As per regular practice when he reported for duty he was allowed. Allowing for duty does not amount to condoning the absence ofthe petitioner. Regarding his ill-health and his parent's ill-health , the respondent company is carrying a mining operation, which is engaged in exploration, excavation , extraction and winning of coal in the four districts of Andhra Pradesh i.e. , Khammam, Karimnagar , Adilabad and Warangal and has a well established chain of hospitals in all its areas and also in the nearbyto cater to the health requirements of its employees and their family members . It is also mandatory under the Mines Act/Regulations to maintain the hospitals that are manned by the qualified medical practitioners. Also the respondent company has rules and regulations to refer the cases ofcomplicated diseases to hospitals such as Nizams Institute ofMedical Sciences etc. , and the charge are also bome by the respondent company . The petitioner is fully aware of the same but did not avail the facilities.

10. That the petitioner was granted LL TC during the May, 2003. The contention ofthe petitioner that the period of leave was also shown as absent is not correct. That as per the rules, the weekly holidays and National Holidays between the absents were also treated as absents. The contention of the petitioner that 30th of April, Jume and November, 2003 were shown as absents is not correct, That for accuracy the absents were taken from the pay sheet . That the petitioner was monthly rated employee. The payment ofmonthly wages should be on Ist of every month . The procedure of calculation ofmonthly wages are being taken from 21st of December 2002 to 20th January, 2003. Likewise all the absence in the months shows the absents from 21st of previous monthto 20th of current month . As such the 30th of April , June and November, 2003 are to be treated as 31st of March, May, October , 2003 only.

8. That the maintainability of the dispute raised by the petitioner before this court may be decided as preliminary issue before proceeding with the trial. The petitioner failed to exhaust the conciliation procedure as laid down in the I.D. Act and filed the present petition before this Tribunal under S.2A(2) of L.D. Act , 1947 as atmended by A.P. Amendment Act , 1987 (Act No.32 of1987). That as the appropriate Government for coal mining industry is the Central Government the State Amendment Act isnot applicable to the respondent company and the petition filedby the petitioner is not maintainable under law and is liable to be dismissed in Bimine. That the petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler in the respondent company on 4-10-1975 and later he was promoted as Coal Cutter .At the time of dismissal he worked at GDK No.3 Incline as Coal Cutter Grade ' C' (SLU) . As per the company's records his dateofbirth is 01-01-1956. That the services ofthe petitioner were utilized on clerical jobs as relieveras and when required in place of leave vacancy of regular clerks , but not continuously from November , 1988, In accordance with the orders dL17-8-2000 of the Hon'ble High Court in W.P.No.916 of 2000 and batch WPs and in accordance with the orderdt.26-12-2000 in WA. No. 1048/2000 and batch W.As. , the petitioner was sent back to his originaljob as Coal Cutter.

1188 GW06-24 1790

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 12 , 2008 /CHAITRA 23 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

company's standing orders No.25.25 which reads as follows:-

"25.25: Habitual late attendance or habitual absence from duty without sufficient cause",

Hewas advised to submit explanation within four days of receipt of the charge sheet . He has received the charge sheet but did not submit any explanation . As such an enquiry notice d1.31-5-2005 was issued advising him to attend the enquiry on 3-6-2004 along with his witnesses, if any. He has received the enquiry notice, he attended the enquiry on 3-6-2004 . He was given full and fair opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. He was explained the procedure of enquiry . He expressed no objection for recording the enquiry proceedings in English . He was given opportunity to cross examine the management witnesses . That management witness No.1 (MW.I ) has produced management witness No.2 ( MW.2) witness. The MW.2 in support ofhis statement has produced 12 months pay sheet from Januaryto December, 2003 pertaining to the petitioner. The documents produced by the MW.2 during the enquiry have been verified in the presence ofpetitioner and found that the petitioner was marked absents as mentioned in the charge sheet . The petitioner in his statement has admitted the charge levelled against him . He stated that he has remained absent from duty due to ill -health of his family members and himself and personal problerns during the year 2003. During counselling he gave an undertaking and he assured that he will work for not less than 22 musters inamonth in future three months i.e., from 4-6-2004 to 3-9- 2004 and prayed to provide him one more opportunity to improve his work performance.

13. Accordingly he was kept under observation for a period of three months from 4-6-2004 to 3-9-2004. The attendance during the observation period is as follows:-

Attendance

Month/year

June, 2004 (from 4-6-04)

11. That the petitioner was charge sheeted under company's standing orders No. 25.25 for his habitual absenteeism during the calendar year 1st January, 2003 to 31st December, 2003. The petitioner was given full and fair opportunity to submit his explanation and also toparticipate in the domestic enquiry . He did not prefer to submit any explanation to the charge sheet . He has fully participated in the enquiry and voluntarily admitted the charges levelled against him . He did not bring out the fact of availment of LLTC by him, during the enquiry for the reasons best known to him. However after careful examination of his overall attendance during the year from 2001 onwards and also keeping in view ofhis habitual absence the penalty that of dismissal from company's service was imposed on him . The contention ofthe petitioner that he has availed LLTC during the month of May, 2003 is an afterthought and an attempt to misleading this court. The petitioner along with others filed WP . No.4757 of 1991 before the Hon'ble High Court ofA.P., Hyderabad seeking direction to absorb them as clerks . In accordance with the various settlements , the selection committee has conducted interview on various dates between 11-5-1998 to 31-1-1999 . The petitioner has attended for interview. As he has not scored qualified marks he was not promoted as clerk. Again the petitioner along with others filed WP .No.916 of2000 and it was disposed in favour of management vide orderdt.17-8-2000. Subsequently, the petitioner along with others filed W.A.No.1048/2000 and it was also disposed in favour of management vide orderdt.26-12-2000. In accordancewith interim orders in the said WP and WA, the petitioner was allowed to continue on clerical jobs . After disposal ofthe said cases the petitioner was sent back to his original job as coal cutter . That the petitioner's original job is coal cutter . The contention of the petitioner that the respondent's company deliberately suffered the petitioner physically, mentally, and financially is not correct. The following are the attendance particulars of the petitioner from2001:-

July,2004

Year

Actual Attendance

August,2004

September,2004

2001

113

2002

159

2003 (charge sheet period)

2004(uptoMay)

That the petitioner failed to improve his attendance and work performance even during the observation period also . Further, a show cause notice dt.4-7-2004 along with the copy ofthe enquiry report and proceedings by advising him to make representation , ifany was issued on him . He acknowledged the same but he did not submit any representation . As the charge levelled against the petitioner was proved and his attendance in the previous years was verypoor and as he did not improve his work performance during the observation period also , the respondent was constrained to dismiss the petitioner from the services of the company w.e.f. , 18-10-2004 .It is, therefore, prayed that the I.D. , filed by the petitionet may kindly be dismissed with costs.

12. The contention of the petitioner that the required minimum musters are 100 , is not correct . That an underground employee should put in 190 mandatory musters minimum per year . As such the petitioner's shortfall musters are 94. That the petitioner has remained absent on a number of days without leave , sick or without suficient cause during the year 2003 , and he had put in only 96 musters during the year 2003. As such he was issuedwith acharge sheet N.RG.J/GDK.3/007/411 , d.22-2-2004under 1791

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008 /चैत्र 23 , 1930

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( i) )

Heard oral arguments on both sides on 21-1-2008.

14. On behalf of the petitioner side, Ex-W- 1-was marked. Onbehalf of the respondent side , Ex.M-1 to Ex.M-11 were marked . Ex . W- 1 and Ex. W- 10 are one and the same. The documents are marked with the consent of boththe parties. Respondent side one decision filed.

15. On behalf of the respondent side the following citeddecision reported as follows:-

17. Heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel appearing for respective parties, (the petitioner counsel stated arguments treated as heard). Ihave perused the contents ofthe claim statement and counter allegations together with all other documents filed into the court and material available on record. I have also taken into consideration the various points raised by the respondent counsel during the course of the arguments. Having seen the entire material available on record and the facts and circumstances of the case, the following charge framed against the petitioner in this case arises for consideration ,

The petitioner for having habitual late attendance or habitual absence from duty without sufficient cause i.e. , during the year 2003 , the petitioner absented on number of days without leave sick or without sufficient cause and he had put only 96 days attendance , it amounts to misconduct.

No. 1-In the High Court ofjudicature ofAndhra Pradesh atHyderabad in W.P.No. 30036/1995 , dt . 6-12-2001, between Thimmaiah Vrs., Additional Industrial Tribunal- curm-Additional Labour Court , Hyderabad and another, reportedin 2002( 1 ) , ALD- 314 (D.B)-Industrial Disputes Act, 1947-Sections 2(00) (bb ) and 25-F- Termination from service on the ground of continued absence from duty under the standing orders does not amount to retrenchment. When such order of termination was made after giving notice to the employee , it is not liable to be challenged.

18. After issuing the charge sheet to the petitioner under Ex. M- 1 , the same was acknowledged by the petitioner under Ex.M -2 . The petitioner did not give any reply to the charge sheet. The petitioner also failed to file if any charge sheet explanation given as alleged by him . The respondent issued the office order appointing the enquiry officer for conducting the domestic enquiry under Ex.M-3. The respondent also issued notice directing the petitioner to attend the enquiry under Ex.M -4 , The petitioner attended the domestic enquiry . On behalf of the respondent side witness, Sri E.John Samuel is examined as MW- 1 and another witness MW-2 Sri Md.Hashan , Pay Sheet Clerk, examined. The petitioner though availed the opportunity and he has not cross examined anything on their evidence. The petitioner gave the statement stating that he received the charge sheet and he admitted the charge levelled against him under the Company Standing Orders 25.25. Petitioner voluntarily admitted that he remained absent from dutywithout leave sick, permission or information on that dates as mentioned in the charge sheet i.c. , he put 96 musters during the year 2003. Further petitioner statedhe has remained absent due to personal problems and ill -health of himself and his family members. He requested the management to forgive him for this time on bumanitarlan grounds and he assured that he will not repeat the same absenteeism in future , The same is marked as Ex.M-5. Enquiry report sent to the respondent . The charge was found guilty of misconduct as per the evidence ofMW- 1 &MW-2 and the voluntarily admission of the petitioner under Ex.M - 6 . The petitioner gave the undertaking after counseling stating that he may not be absent for a period of3 months to prove the same an opportunity shouldbe given. Accordingly , an opportunity was given i.e. , Ex.M -71 Show cause notice issued whyhe should not be removed for his guilty ofmisconduct under Companies Act No.25.25 under Ex.M - 8. Ex.M-9 is the acknowledgement of the petitioner for receiving the show cause notice. Ex.M- 10 is the office order of dismissal . The respondent filed the 16. Before going into the merits ofthe case, Iwould like to submit how this case was delayed. This petition- claim statement was filed on 7-11-2005 , U/Sec . 2 (A) 2 of the I.D. Act , being aggrieved by the order of removal passed by the respondent-management vide Proc. ,dt. 14- 10-2004, and itwas checked and numbered on 25-11-2005. Itwas posted by issning notice to respondent side through RPAD on 9-12-2005, On behalf of the respondent side, Sri D. KrishnaMurthy, Advocate, filled vakalat on 21-4-2006, R-2filed counter. Memo filed adopting the counter ofR- 2by R- 1 and R-3 . On 5-6-2006, Sri K. Sudhakar Reddy, Advocate filed the vakalat, petition U/ Sec. 36(4) leave granted as other side consented . It was posted for framing on preliminary issues on 9-10-2006 and it was posted for hearing on preliminary issues 6-11-2006. On 20-11-2006 beard arguments on both sides , and posted for orders on 21-11-2006. On that day orders pronounced. In the result, thedomestic enquiry conducted is legal , proper valid and binding on the parties . Posted for arguments on 4-12-2006 . On 8-12-2006, counsel for the petitioner wants to file compromisepetition to refer the matter to the Lok Adalat. On 11-6-2007, 15 adjournments were granted for filing petition to sendto Lok Adalat, the petitioner counsel stated the petitioner is not approaching him . If next date not approached, he will report no instructions . Posted finally. On 17-9-2007, junior counsel requested time the respondent counsel stated ready though the court granted 22 adjournments but the petitioner counsel not cooperated for disposal , the court directed if the next date of adjournment , not get ready, filed adjoumment petition or report no instructions, otherwise it will be decided U/Order 17, Rule-3 of CPC and Rule-24 ofA.P. 1.D. , Rules, asit is in the identified list. On 21-1-2008 heard arguments on both sides . On perusal of the docket step, petitioner appeared only for two times for a period ofthree years , and posted forAward 1792

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/ CHAITRA 23 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 (it)] attendance register Xerox copies of the petitioner's employee compared with the original by the Superintendent found it as correct and it is marked as Ex.M - 11 ,

19. Being aggrieved by the dismissal order issued by the respondent against the petitioner, the petitioner filed this I.D. , U/sec.2-A( 2 ) ofthe 1.D. Act, challenging the dismissal order directing the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service with back wages and other attendant benefits etc. In support of the petitioner, the petitioner workman has filed an affidavit petition , he has narrated all the facts and circumstances that he was forcedto file this petition and requested the court to allow this petition as prayed for.

4days of receipt of the charge sheet though he received the charge sheet but did not submit any explanation and also denied the petitioner submitting his explanation to the charge sheet on 27-5-2004 along with medical certificates and the petitioner is put to strict proof ofthe same. The petitioner though received the show cause notice and acknowledged the same , but he did not submit any explanation, The respondent standing counsel mainly relied on the admission of the petitioner for his absenteeism and only attended096 musters . Once the charge is admitted by thepetitioner at the time ofdomestic enquiry without any dispute, the petitioner stated that he was absented 96 musters rolls nothing to be proved by the respondent when the petitioner admined. What more evidence is required when the petitioner himself admitted without objected or disputed as per the charge sheet allegations at the time of domestic enquiry, Further the respondent standing counsel argumenthe denied the submitting charge sheet explanation along with the medical certificate and the petitioner is to putto strict proof of the same. But the petitioner and his counsel failedto file those documents into the court, they also not taken the steps to send for from the respondent . If really those documents were filedby the petitioner and also nothing is prevented by the petitioner to file the Xerox copies orby examining concerned persons to prove that the petitioner taken the treatment, but in all the aspects the petitioner failed to do so . The next point of the petitioner counsel his availment of LLTC was taken absenteeism during the month ofMay, 2003. For this respondent standing counsel not accepted the contention of the petitioner that the period ofleave was also shown his absent not correct, as per the Ex . M- 11 attendance register Xerox copies filed into the court and also as per the charge sheet Ex.M- 1 which itself clearly go to show that in the month ofMay, 18th to 22nd was not shown as absent. If the days are disputed, the petitioner is nothing prevented to file the documents showing his days not calculated for the LLTC availed. Except the oral contention the petitioner failed to prove LL TC was shown as absent,

20. Onbehalf of the petitioner side the petitioner relied on the claim petition contents as defence plea and also petitioner argued treated as heard. The petitioner submitted his explanation to the charge sheet along with medical certificates . The LLTC granted to the petitioner with pay and allowance, but surprisingly this period was alsoshown as absent. The total paid national holidays and weeklyholidays of2003 were also unjustly shown as absent Le, 31 stApril , June and November, 2003 were shown as absent. There is no shortage of 4 musters for the require minimum of 100 musters is an utter false. The petitioner originallywas appointed as Badli worker, subsequently he was promoted as Coal Cutter and his services were confirmed. The petitioner requested the respondent to regularize the services as Acting Clerk . The petitioner in the year 2001 i.e. , after 15 years service as a Clerk,he was again posted as a Coal Cutter in the under ground which is very strentious in nature, it affected his health very badly and he suffered from serious ill -health chronic back pain andjoint pains to his knees etc. , He worked for more than required minimum 100 musters in 2001 and 2002. The charge sheet was issued alleging that he was put only 96 days of attendance during the year 2003. He served in the respondent company for more than 29 years . The respondent dismissed by unfair labour practice . Hence he prays this court to set aside the dismissal and direct the respondent to reinstate him with all benefits etc. , to meet the ends ofjustice.

21. For this, respondent standing counsel argument on behalf of the respondent side relied the documents charge sheet Ex.M- 1 , enquiry report Ex.M -6 , petitioner's undertaking letter after counseling Ex.M-7 , show cause notice Ex,M -8 , office order of dismissal Ex M -10 and the Xerox copies of the attendance register compared and attested by the Superintendent filed and marked under Ex.M- 11 . The respondent counsel also relied on the enquiry proceedings i.e. , the evidence ofrespondent -management witnesses Sri E. John Samuel , MW- 1 and Sri Md.Hashan, MW-2, The petitioner's admission at the time of domestic enquiry all are marked under EX.M-5.

22. From the respondent standing counsel argument, the petitioner was advised to submit his explanation within

23. From the petitioner's counsel contention the petitioner underwent treatment in the company hospitals and other private hospitals also. The petitioner's old aged ailing parents also suffered from ill-bealth very seriously and his wife also fell seriously ill and suffered from abdomen ulcer in 2003. For that she also underwent major surgery and the petitioner was compelled to take care ofhis wife and parents also, as he is the sole member who has to look after them. Sothere is reasonable sufficient cause for the allegedabsenteeism of the petitioner . It is not at all habitual one or deliberate as it is inevitable and beyond the control of the petitioner. For this respondent standing counsel argument. The respondent maintain the hospitals that are manned by the qualified medical practitioners . As per the respondent company rules and regulations to refer the cases of complicated diseases to hospitals such as Nizam 1293 [ भाग-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

Institute ofMedical Sciences etc. , and the charges are also borned by the respondent company, but the petitioner fully aware ofthe same, he did not avail the facilities. That itself shows ifreally the petitioner suffered ill-health and taken treatment nothing is prevented by him to produce the medical certificates or by examining the doctors who examined him before the court , but the petitioner failed to do so to prove that he suffered ill-health and his parents . So the petitioner's contention is only an afterthought to get over his absence.

remained absent for a number of days without leave, sich or without sufficient cause, but petitioner put only 96 days ofattendance during the year 2003. It is also an admitted position that the said absenteeism is une authorised and there were no prior leave taken. The petitioner's contention that the said absenteeism was suffered ill-health and his parents and also his wife as he is the male member to look after them invariable, so he was absented from duties . But the petitioner nothing is prevented to apply the leave by taking prior permission and sanction of leave, but the petitioner failed to do so .His oral evidence was not supported by the any other cogens reliable oral and documentary evidence particularly non examination ofthe doctor from whom the treatment takes bythe petitioner for his ill-health. The petitioner's except the general allegations, but he failed to prove the genuineness of the allegations made in the petition. It in well settled that a person who approached the court with false explanation is not entitled to any relief. There is no extenuating circumstances to accept the material on recon placedby the petitioner. Having burden on the petitioner toprovehis case, but the petitioner failed to discharge his burden.

24. The petitioner's contention that the respondents condone the absence of the petitioner and took the petitioner into service is not correct . Petitioner allowing for his duty does not amount to condone the absence of the petitioner. The respondent after careful examination ofhis over all attendance during the year 2001 onwards and also keeping in view of his habitual absence , the petitionerwas given the familycounseling though the petitioner gave the undertaking in future he will not be absent, but the petitioner continuing by habitual absenteeism without any improvement . Owing the counseling he gave an undertaking and he assured that he will work for not less than 22 musters in a month in future 3 months and prayed to provide him one more opportunity to improve his work performance.Accordingly, he was kept under observation for a period of 3 months from 4-6-2004 to 3-9-2004, the attendance during the observation period is as follows. In the month ofJune attended 6 days , July, 11 days , August, 22 days and September , 5 days . When there is no improvement on the petitioner's attendance a show cause notice was issued to him, but he did not submit any reply to the show cause notice . As per the enquiry report he found guilty and he was dismissed as per the office order.

27. In this case, the petitioner though allegedhe gavethe charge sheet explanation, but the same was not filed into the court, respondent standing counsel also denied. stating that petitioner not gave any explanation τα the charge sheet . Even then petitioner did not taken steps from the respondent for production of charge sheet explanation, if it was really submitted to the respondent. The non taking ofsteps if really filed an adverse inference can be drawn against the petitioner either not filing the charge sheet explanation or submitting the charge sheat explanation to the respondent. The petitioner also after receipt show cause notice, he did not submit his reply to the show cause notice . When the petitioner failed to submit his charge sheet explanation and reply to the show cause notice itself clearly go to show that the petitioner had no explanation to offer and presumed that he had admitted the proposed punishment of dismissal order passed by the respondent.

1 25. The petitioner counsel contended with regard to regularization of the service of the petitioner ie , the petitioner requested the respondent to regularize his service as acting Clerk . For this respondent standing counsel contended that the petitioner along with others filed the W.P.No.916/2000 and it was disposed in favour of the management vide order dtd.17-8-2000. Against that the petitioner and others filed the W.A. NO. 1048/2000 and it was also disposed in favour of management vide order did. 26-12-2000 . In accordance with interim orders in the said W. P., and W.A. , the petitioner was allowed to continue after disposal of the writ the petitioner was sent back to his originaljob as Coal Cutter.

28. In this case, the petitioner's own admission in his statement at the time of domestic enquiry he stated follows.He received the charge sheet and he admitted the charge levelled against under the companies Standing Orders 25.25 . He voluntarily admitted that he remained absent from duty without leave, sick permission or Information on the dates as mentioned in the charge shoot. The petitioner put only 096 musters during the year 2003. He remained absent due to his personal problems and ill health of himself and his family members . Petitiongr requested the management to forgive him for this time on humanitarian grounds andhe assured he will not repost the same absenteeism in future. Though the same was algo stated after the counselling and also by giving an 26. The petitioner contention that the require minimum muster roils are 100 is not correct, the petitioner an underground employee should put in 190 mandatory musters mininum per year. As such the petitioner's short fall musters are 94. For this respondent standing counsel argument the petitioner contentions are generally vague , ambiguous , contradictory and invented an afterthought and not even prima facle supported by any reliable evidence. It is an admitted fact and position that the petitioner 1794

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]

way. So it is competent to the petitioner to put atleast any question in the cross examination which the petitioner may consider important to test the accuracy veracity of the witness to denythe charge and to prove his defence plea. The effect of non cross examination of the respondent- management witness when a fact is stated about the misconduct of habitual late attendance or habitual absent from duty without sufficient cause stated in their chief examination and there is no cross examination on that point naturally it leads to the inference that the respondent witnesses evidence accepts as the truth of the evidence givenby them. When the petitioner not at all cross examined the respondent witnesses to discredit him his evidence can be believed and accepted as true proved the charge against the petitioner,

undertaking, but the petitioner absented himself without prior permission or sanction of leave . An admission is the statement oral or documentary which suggests any inferenceas to anyfact in issue or relevant facts andwhich is made by the petitioner . Admission is substantive evidence of the fact admitted in the domestic enquiry without objection or disputed for his absence without permission and sanction of leave due to his ill health and familyproblems .The petitioner did not make the admission and not contested the admission . The charge is framed and it is proved on the basis of admission was proper and valid. Once the charge is admitted nothing is to be proved bythe respondent and therefore the I.D. , was not to proceed further with the enquiry and findings of the charge. When the petitioner admitted at the time ofdomestic enquiry what more evidence is required. When it has admittedly observed that the proved act of misconduct in case of absenteeism and habitual absenteeism petitioner's by his actions or inactions causes loss of work to the corporation.

30. The word misconduct should be given wide meaning whether the particular misconduct was severe or otherwise will depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case. No hard and past rule can be laid down to gauge the severity and triviality of the misconduct . The misconduct inthis case habitual late attendance or habitual absent from duty the defence plea of the petitioner, the petitioner under went treatment due to his ill- health and his old aged ailing parents suffered from ill health very seriously and also his wife's went underwent major surgery for abdomen ulcer , he is the sole member who has to look after them . Those are the reasonable and sufficient cause forthe alleged absence of the petitioner and he is not at all habitual one or deliberate one and beyond his control . The misconductwhich may not be considered in certain cases tobe serious can be serious in another set of circumstances . The court must appreciate the nature of misconduct itself effect and attended circumstances under which the misconduct has been committed and other allied factors like whether the misconduct has been done out of the ordinary human weakness . It is done that the question of severity and punishment has to be considered in strict comparison with the misconduct committed by the petitioner. The punishments are two types , first is the dismissal shallbe awarded for the gravest act ofmisconduct where involved in a proved misconduct of grave charges. The 2nd part is the reformable to a misconduct which by itself may not warrant an order of removal, by giving, an opportunity to improve his trustworthiness in a fiduciary capacity.

31. From the petitioner counsel main argument urged with regard toquantum of punishment the order ofdismissal of the petitioner from the service was harsh shockingly disproportionate and not at all consumerate with the gravity ofalleged charge of misconduct ofhabitual late attendance or habitual absent from duty without sufficient cause the petitioner put in only 96 days of attendance as required 100 musters levelled against the petitioner as discussed above in detail .The capital punishment of dismissal from service inflicted it amounts to economic death on the 29. The next contention ofthe respondent standing counsel argument was that though the respondent gave an opportunity to cross examine the respondent management witnesses i.e. , Sri E. John Samuel and SriMd.Hashan, but the petitioner not at all cross examined anything from them . Veracity of the evidence of the respondent management witness could have been tested ifhis evidence was appreciated on the touch stone of his cross examination . The cross examination is if properly conducted is one ofthe most useful and efficacy means to discover the truth by eliciting the defence plea as the case ofthe respondent witness is false and the defence plea is correct.The purpose of cross examination is two fold, first the cross examination tries to discover ifthe story told by the witness in examination in chief is tainted by exaggeration or false wood, secondly the adverse party can in some cases construct his lime ofdefence from out of the mouth of the witness . It is the rule ofjustice that a petitioner must put the crucial and important point of the case to the respondent witnesses gave evidence that the petitioner was put only 96 days instead of 100 working musters in his cross examination . The defence plea ofthe petitioner if no such questions are put them , the court presume that the witness evidence has been accepted. If it is intended to suggest that a witness was not speaking the truth upon a particular point his attention first be directed to the fact by cross examination, so that he may have an opportunity of giving an explanation . In this case though Ibe opportunity was given to the petitioner but he was not at all cross examined. When there is no cross examination of the respondent management witnesses, his evidence can bebelieved as he was not discredited by the petitioner. In this case in the domestic enquiry the respondent- management witnesses were examined it is marked under Ex.M-5. The statement of respondent witnesses evidence it is right to subject him to impeachment in the appropriate 1795 [भाग 11-खण्ड 3(ii) )

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12 , 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

petitioner amounts to highly arbitrary and not at all warranted to the present facts of the case. The previous service rendered by the petitioner i.e. , petitioner was appointed as Badli Worker in the respondent company in the year, 1975, the petitioner was promoted as Coal Cutter and his services was confirmed in the year 1977. From the year 1986 to till 2000, the respondent authorities utilized his services as acting clerk and also chit issuing clerk in theareahospital. In the year 2001 , the petitioner was again postedas CoalCutter.The petitioner discharged his duties with utmost satisfaction of his superiors without any kind ofblemish and put up 250 to 300 musters for several years. Heservedthe company for more than 29 years i.e, 3 long decades . As per the respondent cited decision is not applicable as it is no way similar on facts and circumstances as in the following case the facts are distinct and distinguishable. Some minor punishment would have been sufficient and it is open to the court to set aside the punishment order and direct the respondent to reinstate thepetitioner into service with all attendant benefits as the punishment is not proportionate for the misconduct of absenteeism.

33. From both the counsel argument with regard to punishment to give appropriate relief in cases ofthe charge ofdismissal ofa workman U/Sec . 11 -A ofthe I.D., Act, the onlyquestion that remains in this case is that whether the punishment isjustified in the circumstances and the nature of allegations in the charge of misconduct as per the respondent company standing orders No. 25.25 Habitual late attendance or habitual absence from duty without sufficient cause . From the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner was that on the question of punishment order of dismissal against the petitioner is excessive and that lesser punishment would meet the ends ofjustice as it was shockingly disproportionate for the misconduct as stated above. It is stated to be one of the grounds on which the petitioner could be removed from service. The petitioner's counsel argument was that for the misconduct done out of ordinary human weakness die extreme punishment of dismissal ought not to have been awarded.The petitioner- workman Coal cutter will be givin a lesser punishment by giving an opportunity to improte his performance of his duties as this is the Ist time in. Nis service for a period of 29 years (for perusal no SR. , is filed intothe court ) .The only fault committed by the petitioner is thathe was not observed the company standing orders without applying prior permission and sanction of leave for his absence period, but in this case, company not objected for his re-joining into duties after his absence to attend the duties for that mistaken committed by the petitioner the punishment given by the respondent is excessive. This court should observe that there may not be any malafidies or willful intention on the part of the petitioner. The court must appreciate the nature of misconduct and its effect and attended circumstances under which the misconduct has been committed and allied factors as the misconduct has been done out of ordinary humun weakness. It is then that the question of severity of punishment has to be considered in strict comparison with the misconduct committed by the petitioner. Such comparison is looked into while considering the question of nature of punishment. The petitioner served in the corporation for nearly 29 years without any remarks suld this is the first absenteeism committed by the petitioner . For the dismissal ofthe petitioner actually the real victim of any such punishment is the family member ofthe petitioner who is the bread winner isjobless as a result, he and Nis family are suffering from food and facing untold financial problems. These are the above mitigating factors which warrant necessity of lesser punishment .

34. From the respondent standing counsel argument thediscretion can be exercised U/Sec . 11 -A ofthe IDAct is available only on the existence of certain parameters like punishment being disproportionate to the gravity of misconduct, so as to disturb the concise ofthe court or the existence of any mitigating circumstances which requirts the reduction of the punishment is past conduct of the 32. From this the respondent standing counsel argument the power of Labour Court Tribunal to interfere with the quantum of punishment under the powers of the ID Act, was limited and when once the charge has been found to be proved the Labour Court Tribunal cannot interfere with the quantum ofpunishment. The misconduct of charge of absenteeism as discussed above serious in nature . In this case the petitioner not submitted the explanation to the charge sheet and also no replyto the show cause notice given . Though the petitioner was family counseled and he gave an undertaking he will not be absented in future without permission and sanction of leave, but the petitioner failed to do so . This court cannot take any lenient view and substitute its own opinion for that of the respondent- management. When there is no improvement in his conduct of attending the duties , finally the management is left with no alternative , as there is no improvement on the part of the petitioner , but to result to the extreme punishment of dismissal from service ofthe petitioner. There is no extenuating circumstances to accept the material on record placed by the petitioner . Having burden on the petitioner to prove his case , but the petitioner failed to discharge his burden . It is well established that this court should not mechanically use the words punishment being disproportionate to the charge . This court is required to give reasons as to why the punishment isgrossly disproportionate to the discretionary powers cannot be equated with the power of veto. When the petitioner is undoubtedly committed the misconduct of absenteeism. In these circumstances. This court cannot take any lenient view by considering the powers U/Sec. 11- Aofthe I.D. Act, and substitute its own opinion for that of the respondent punishment dismissal order.

1796

[PART I-SEC . 3(ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/ CHAITRA 23 , 1930

petitionerwhich may persuade by this Court to reducethe punishment. The court to interfere with the quantum of punishment the discretion has to be used judiciously and not capriciously it should observe that harsh punishment only disproportionate the charge should be criterion for interference, In the absence of any such mitigating factors existing this Court cannot by way of sympathy alone exercisethe powers U/Sec.11 -A ofthe ID Act and reduce the punishment.

having worked his entire service there is no question of getting any alternative employment anywhere as he worked for aperiod of29years in the company without any blemish record. It is well established that this court should not mechanically use the words punishment being disproportionateto the charge. This court is required to give the reasons as to why the punishment is grossly disproportionate . From the above discussed parameters are in myopinion are the mitigating factors in which warned the necessity of recording a finding that the punishment in this case was disproportionate to the misconduct proved. The only fault committed by the petitioner is that without prior permission and sanction of leave he was absented and the company was joined him without any objection . Proportionately involves balancing test and necessity test.

36. This court observes that there may not be any malafidies orwillful intention to commit the misconduct on the part of the petitioner for the only fault committed by the petitioner he was absented without prior permission and sanction of leave. For that the punishment order passed bythe respondent to the petitioner is excessive and I would saythat the punishment is not proportionate . Hence , in my view the petitioner will be given a fresh opportunity to improve his excellence of performance of his duty, some minor punishment would have been sufficient and test uponto set aside the punishment as the punishment is not proportionate.

37. I am of the opinion that the judgment cited by the learned counsel for the respondent year 2002( 1 ) ALD- 314 (D.B.) U/Sec.2(oo)(bb) and Sec.25(F) of I.D. Act, in the case has no application whatsoever on the facts of the present case is no way similar on facts and circumstances and the facts are distinct and distinguishable. It is well settled that a little difference in facts or additional facts may make a lot ofdifference in the presidential value ofthe decision.

38. In my considered opinion this court while exercising its jurisdiction vested in it w/ sec . 11 -A of the I.D. Act, accordingly considered the question of relating to proportionality involves balancing test and necessity test. These are in my opinion from the above discussed mitigating factors in detail which warrant the necessityof regarding a finding that the punishment in this case was not proportionate to the proved misconduct . Thus in the light of my discussions while upholding the findings of the enquiry officer and the respondent order . I am of the opinion that the punishment of dismissal is not consumeratewith the charge ofmisconduct levelled against the petitioner and I would say that punishment is not proportionate. In view of that this court came to the conclusion that the punishment of dismissal order against the petitioner is harsh and not proportionate to the proved charge levelled against him in exercise of the same , I modify the punishment of dismissal order passed by the respondent into the lesser punishment .

35. Further from both the counsel argument the court must taken into consideration all the relevant facts and circumstances and can interfere with the punishment of dismissal order by the respondent only, when it comes to theconclusion that the punishment imposed is extremely harah anddisproportionate to the misconduct proved. The punishments are two types one is the dismissal shall be awarded for the gravest act of misconduct where involved in a serious misconduct of charges against the petitioner. The 2nd part is the reformable to a misconduct which by itself may not warrant an order of dismissal and may be a ground to take lenient view by giving an opportunity to reform by the petitioner. The number of years of service past record ofthe petitioner may not alone be a relevant factor in awarding lesser punishment, but it is one of the factor to be considered. When such powers are being invoked this court is required to examine the connected parameters namely nature of the charge proved i.e. , company standing orders No. 25.25 Habitual late attendance or habitual absence from duty without sufficient cause. The petitioner was appointed as Badli Worker in the respondent's company in the year 1975 and in the year 1977hewas promoted as coal cutter . From 1986 to 2000 his services utilized as acting Clerk. Since from the appointment the petitioner discharged his duties to the utmost satisfaction ofhis superiors without any kind blemish and he has put up 250 to 300 musters for all the years . The petitioner's length of service in the respondent comраnу already worked 29 years andbe is at the fag end ofservice. To show the past record ofthe Petitioner , no S.R. , is filed intothe court.The social background ofthe poor petitioner, consisting of large family and he has not committed any wanton misconduct, of absenteeism not intentional or willful, but due to the ill-health ofthe petitioner, his wife and parents as he is sole member to look after them. At the same time company also not questioned at the time of re- joining after the absence period. It is not a case where the petitioner involved in a prove misconduct of forgery, misappropriation of money and funds of the company and fabrication of materal documents as all these acts attracts grave misconduct. But in this case, the misconduct of absenteeism without prior permis" and sanction of leave, for that punishment of dismissal imposed by the respondent-management is disproportionate to the misconduct by the petitioner, some minor punishment would have been sufficient. At the fag end ofhis service 1797 [भाग 1Ⅱ-खण्ड ( i) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

ExM-11

Attendance register for the months ofJan., 2003, Feb.,2003, April,2003 to December,2003 (X-Copies).

आदेश

नई दिल्ली, 18 मार्च, 2008

का.आ. 827. जबकि केन्द्र सरकार का यह मत है कि भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधन से संबंधित नियोक्ताओं एवं इसके साथ संलग्न अनुसूची के संबंध में उनके कामगारों के मध्य एक औधोगिक विवाद है ; :

और जबकि इस विवाद में राष्ट्रीय महत्व का प्रश्न शामिल है एवं ऐसी प्रकृति का भी है कि इसमें एक राज्य से अधिक में स्थित भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रतिष्ठानों के इसमें रूचि रखने अथवा प्रभावित होने की संभावना है;

और जबकि केन्द्र सरकार का यह मत है कि उक्त विवाद का राष्ट्रीय अधिकरण द्वारा न्यायनिर्णयन किया जाना चाहिए;

39. In the result, the punishment order of dismissal of the petitioner Ex- Coal Cutter from service by the respondent company vide office order dt. 14-10-2004, is set aside and the respondent-management company is directed to appoint the petitioner into service as a fresh Coal Cutter only. On condition subject to production of medical fitness certificate by the petitioner issued by the medical examination by the respondent company as per the procedure laid down in the standing orders, due to the absenteeism for ill-health, the petitioner not filed friness certificate tojoin the duty. Further ifthe petitioner absented himself from duty without leave or prior intimation or sanction of leave on single occasion during the period of two years, his services may be dismissed. The award will come into force after expiry of 30 days from its Gazette publication. Within 30 days after its publication, the petitioner should approach the respondent by appearing inperson or byRegd. Post with Ack. , Due or by means of legal notice with a request to issue an order of fresh appointment as Coal Cutter only. Otherwise, the petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed and the petitioner need not be appointed,

Accordingly, with this above modification, the award is passed . But in the circunstances , no costs.

Typed to my dictation directly by Typist, corrected andpronounced by me in the open court on this, the 20th day ofFebruary,2008.

SRI M. SHANMUGAM, Chairman- cum-PresidingOfficer

Appendix ofEvidence

अतः अब केन्द्र सरकार औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 7ख द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए एतद्वारा एक राष्ट्रीय औद्योगिक अधिकरण का गठन करती है, जिसका मुख्यालय कोलकाता में होगा एवं न्यायमूर्ति श्री सी.पी. मिश्रा, धर्ममान में पीठासीन अधिकारी , सी जी आई टी-सह - श्रम न्यायालय , कोलकाता को इसके पीटासीन अधिकारी के रूप में नियुक्त करती है , और औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 1क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उक्त औद्योगिक विवाद को न्यायनिर्णयन हेतु उक्त राष्ट्रीय अधिकरण के सुपुर्द करती है । उक्त राष्ट्रीय अधिकरण 6 महीनों की अवधि के अन्दर अपना निर्णय देगा । Witnesses Examined

अनुसूधी

For Workman: For Management

-NIL

-NIL-

EXHIBITS

ForWorkman :

Dismisal Order

Ex.W-1 14-10-2004

ForManagement :

" क्या श्रमिक संघ की पारतीय खाद्य निगम के विभागीय कामागारों को कोलकाता बन्दरग्राह के बन्दगाह एवं गोदी कामगारों के समतुल्य 1-6-2000 से सुनिश्चित वेतन उन्न्यन योजना प्रदान करने एवं 1-1-1998 से मकान किराया भत्ता नगर प्रतिकर मत्ता की स्वीकृति की मांग विधिक एवं न्यायसंगत है ? यदि नहीं, तो कामगार किन लाभों के पात्र हैं?"

22-02-2004

Ex.M-1

Charge sheet

[सं. एल-22012/304/2006- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] 24-03-2004

Ex.M-2

Acknowledgement

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी 01-07-2002

ExM-3

Office order (Enquiry nomination letter)

ORDER

31-05-2004

Ex.M-4

Enquiry call letter

03-06-2004

NewDelhi, the 18th March, 2008

Ex. M-5

Domestic enquiry statement ofthe petitioner

03-06-2004

Ex. M-6

Enquiry report

03-06-2004

Ex. M-7

Petitioner undertaking letter

8.0.827. Whereas the Central Govt, is of the opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in relation to the management of FCI and their workmen in respect to the schedule hereto annexed ;

after counselling

04-07-2004

ExM-8

Show cause notice

07-07-2004

ExM-9

Acknowledgement

Office order

14-10-2004

ExM-10

And whereas the dispute involves question of national importance and also is of such nature that the establishments of Food Corporation of India situated in more than one State are likely to be interested in, oraffected; 118846/08-25 1798

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/CHAITRA 23 , 1930

[PART II-SBC, 3 ( 0) ]

Shri M. L. Jain,

And whereas the Central Government is of the opinion that the said disputes should be adjudicated by theNational Tribunal;

.....Workman /Union

ExCommitteeMember, SKMS Near Panchayat Mandir, Shahdol (MP) Versus

SubArea,Manager, Jhagrakhand RO SECL, PO :West Jhagrakhand Colliery, Distt. Surguja

........Management

AWARD

Passed on this 19th day of February 2008 Now, therefore, the Central Government, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by Section 7B ofthe I.D. Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), hereby constitutes a National Industrial Tribunal with the Head Quarters at Kolkata and appoint Justice Shri C.P. Mishra , presently Presiding Officer CGIT- cum-LC, Kolkata as its Presiding Officer and in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub- Section (1A) ofSection 10 of the I.D. Act, hereby refers the said Industrial Dispute to the said National Tribunal for adjudication . The said National Tribunal shall give its award within a period ofsix months .

SCHEDULE

1.TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour vide its notification No. L- 22012/332/97/IR(CM - II ) dated 20-7-1998has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

"Whether the demand of the Union for extendingAssured Career Progression Scheme to Departmentalized workers of FCI w.e.f. 1-6-2000 and grant of HRA /CCA w.e.f. 1-1-1998 at par with Port & Dock Workers at Kolkata Port is legal and justifled? If not, to what relief the workers are entitled?"

"Whether the action of the Dy.GM/Sub Area Manager , Jhagrakhand Sub Area of SECL in dismissing Sh Heeralal S/o Dulare , Loader, South Jhagrakhand Colliery from company services w.e.f. 31-1-92 is legal andjustified ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled ?"

[No. L-22012/304/2006- IR (C- II)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, DeskOfficer

2. Vide order dated 28-11-05 , the reference proceeded exparte against the workman.

नई दिल्ली, 19 मार्च , 2008

का.आ. 828. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का ।4 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.ई.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 141/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-3-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-22012/332/ 1997- आईआर (सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 19th March , 2008

3. The case of the management in briefis as follows . That workman Heeralal was employed as Loader in South Jhagrakhand colliery. He was in the habit of remaining absent from duty without sanctioned leave or without intimation . Therefore a chargesheet was issued to him for his act of misconduct and indiscipline . An enquiry was conducted by the management against him legally and properly. The workman was given full opportunity in the enquiry to defend himself. The charges levelled against the workman were fully proved. As the charges of misconduct were proved against him, he was dismissed from the company's services . The workman is not entitled toany relief.

4. As the case proceeded exparte against the workman, there is no evidence on record on behalf ofthe workman

5. The management in order to prove their case filed affidavit of Shri S.K. Jha, then working as Sr. Personnel Officer, harkhand Sub Area in SECL, Hasdeo Area.

S.O. 828. in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 141 / 1998) ofthe Central Governinent Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SECL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19-3-2008.

6. I have heard Shri A.K. Shashi , Advocate the learned counsel for the management .

[No. L-22012/332/1997 -IR (C- II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

7. I have very carefully gone through the entire evidence on record .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

(No. CGIT/LC/R/ 141 /98)

8. The case of the management is fully established and proved from the uncontroverted and unchallenged affidavit of their witness Shri S.K. Jha . Therefore the reference deserves to be decided in favour of the management and against the workman without any orders as to costs.

Presiding Officer : Shri C.M. Singh, 1799 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

AWARD

Passed on this 5th day of March 2008

1. TheGovernment of India, Ministry ofLabour vide itsNotification No. L-22012/25/95 - IR(C- II) dated29-8-95 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

9. In view of the above , the reference is answered in favour ofthe management and against the workman without any orders as to costs holding that the action of Dy.GM/ Sub Area Manager , Jhagrakhand sub Area of SECL in dismissing Sh . Heeralal S/o Dulare , Loader , South Jhagrakhand Colliery from company services w.e.f. 31-1-92 is legal and justified. Consequently the workman is not entitled to any relief.

10. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Govenument of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment asper rules.

C. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer .

"क्या चचाई एण्ड रूंगट्य सब एरिया एस.ई.सी.एल. पोस्ट अमलई कोलरी , जिला- शहडोल ( म.प्र. ) के प्रबंधकों द्वारा श्रमिक श्री कन्हई , बल्द नगेसर टोनं. 2095/3293 को जनवरी 1981 से मई 1993 तक अंडरग्राउंड अलाउन्स का भुगतान न करना न्यायोचित है ? यदि नहीं, तो संबंधित कर्मकार किस अनुतोष का हकदार है ?" नई दिल्ली , 19 मार्च , 2008

का.आ. 829,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.ई.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 157/1995 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-3-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

2. Workman's case in brief is as follows. Thathe was employed as Trammer, Opium Mines ofBurhar Colliery No. 1. His token No. was 2095/3293 . He contacted tuberculosis and the breathing illness . The Doctor advised him towork on surface and accordingly he was offeredjob to work on surface in 1991. That in May- 1993 , he was transferred to Chachai Mines where he was not givenjob to work on surface, rather he was asked to work underground. That he received underground allownce upto year 1980 but from Jan- 1981 , he was not given underground : allowance . It has been prayed by the workman that the management be directed to pay him underground allowance from January- 1981 to May 1993 .

[र्स एल-22012/25/ 1995- आईआर( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 19th March, 2008

S.O. 829. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 157/ 1995) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SECL and their workmen, which was receivedby the Central Government on 19-3-2008.

[No. L-22012/25/ 1995- IR(C- II)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

3. The case ofthe management in briefis as follows. That the claim of the workman for payment of underground allowance is illegal and unjustified as during the period from 1981 to May 1993 , he had worked on surface in alternativejob on the recommendation ofthe Medical Officer as he was suffering from Tubrculosis and Bronchitis . That the underground allowance is admissible to those workmen who are deployed underground and is not extended to persons/employees working on surface. That as per clause 4.1 of the I.I. No. 5 circulated by JBCCI , underground allowance shall continue to be paid to those employees working underground as defined in the Mines Act and Regulations framed thereunder . Under the above circumstances, the workman is not entitled to underground allowance or any other relief whatsoever.

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT /LC/ R/157/95

4.Vide order dated 28-3-06 passed on the ordersheet ofthis reference, the reference proceeded exparte against theworkman.

PresidingOfficer : Shri C. M. Singh

5.As the reference proceeded exparte against the

workman, there is no oral evidence of workman on record .

Shri Jagdish Singh ,

General Secretary, KoylaMazdoor Sabha (UTUC), Post Dhanpuri,

Workman / Union

6. The management in order to prove their case examined their witness Shri K.A. Sunder, then working as Dy. Personnel Manager in SECL, Amlai and Bangwar Sub Area

Distt. Shahdol (MP)

Versus

The Sub Area Manager,

7. I have heard Shri A.K. Shashi , Advocate learned counsel for the management . I have very carefully gone through the evidence on record.

8. The case of the management is fully established : and proved from the uncontroverted and unchallenged Rungta Chachai Sub Area, SECL, Post Amlai Colliery, Distt. Shahdol

.....Management

1188 04/06-26 1800

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008 / CHAITRA 23 , 1930

affidavit of management's witness Shri K.A. Sunder . Therefore the reference deserves to be decided in favour of the management and against the workman without any orders as to costs .

9. In view of the above, the reference is decided in favour ofthe management and against the workman without any orders as to costs holding as follow :-

"चचाई एण्ड रूंगटा सब एरिया एस.ई.सी.एल. पोस्ट अमलई कोलरी , जिला- शहडोल ( म.प्र. ) के प्राधकों द्वारा श्रमिक श्री कन्हई, बल्द नणेसर दो.नं. 2095/3293 को जनवरी 1981 से मई 1993 तक अंडरग्राउंड अलाउन्स का भुगतान न करना न्यायोचित है । अतः संबंधित कर्मकार किसी अनुतोष का हकदार नहीं हैं ।" 10. Let the copies of the award be sentto the Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules .

C. M. SINGH , PresidingOfficer नईदिल्ली, 19 मार्च , 2008

का.आ. 830,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.ई.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 137/1995 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-3-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [सं एल-22012/16/1995-आईआर (सी-11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 19th March , 2008

S.O. 830. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 137/ 1995) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SECL and their workman, whichwas received by the Central Government on 19-3-2008.

[No. L-22012/16/1995-IR (C- II )] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

(No. CGIT/LC/R/ 137/95)

PRESENT: Presiding Officer : Shri C.M. Singh.

TheArea General Secretary,

M.P.K.M.S. (H.M.S .) , House No. B/57,

VikasNagar,

Kusmunda Colony, Post Kusmunda,

......Workman/Union Distt. Bilaspur

Versus

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( 10) ] TheGeneral Manager,

SECL, KusmundaArea,

PostKusmunda,

Distt .Bilaspur

........Management

AWARD

Passed on this 1st day of February , 2008 1. TheGovernment of India, Ministry ofLabour vide its notification No. L-22012/ 16/95/ IR ( C- 11 ) dated 14-7-1995 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

"Whether the action of SECL, Kusmunda Area in transferring S/Sh . S.P. Singh , Dumper Operator & A.K. Choudhary, Shovel Operator to VTC in their the then existing capacity grade and scale of pay and subsequently redesignating them as Instructor VTC or " A" as well as converting them from daily rated to monthly rated without giving opportunity to S/Sh N.J. Lal, C/o T. Narsinghmul , ShovelOperator RU Singh, Shovel Operator , G.S. Roy, Sr. Mechanic and S.C. Sharma, Sr. Mechanic is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workmen are entitled and from which period ?"

2. The case ofworkman/Union in brief is as follows . That Shri S.P. Singh and Shri A.K. Choudhary prior to their redesignation / placement as instructor in T& S Grade 'A' , were working in Excavation cadre by holding the post of Dumper/Shove ! Operator respectively . They are much junior to Sarva Shri N.J. Lal , Crane Operator , T. Narsingmullu , Shovel Operator, R.U. Singh, Shovel Operator , G.S. Roy, Sr. Mechanic , S.C, Sharna, Sr. Mechanic theworkmen in this case, employees ofexcavation cadre at Kusmunda. That as per cadre scheme of the company, there is no provision of conversion/placement ofexcavation cadre employees i.e. non technical and Supervisory Personnel in monthly rated cadre i.e. in Technical & Supervisory personnel . If there is any such vacancy of instructor in technical and supervisory cadre , that can be done only by a duly constituted Deprtmental Promotional Committee after observing all the formalities . So far the case of above 5 employees of Kusmunda is concerned, ali the employees are working in Excavation Cadre and have been superseded by Shri S.P. Singh and Shri A.K. Choudhary, which has been done by the management at their own interest . That the Area Management violating all procedures of DPC converted the above two daily rated employees directly in monthly cadre in Technical and SupervisoryGrade " A " which is quite illegal and unjustified. That the post of instructor is technical and Supervisory Grade "B" whereas the promotees have been converted and placed in Technical and Supervisory Grade' A' which is illegal . That the above two employees have also been given full payprotection in the post of instructor whereas in the same type of other cases of Kusmunda , other employees have not been given pay protection which also 1801

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12 , 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

6. The management in order to prove their case filed affidavit oftheir witness Shri Jose Mathew, then working as Personnel Manager, Kusmunda Project of SECL.

7. Ihave heard Shri A.K. Shashi, Advocate, learned counsel for the management . I have very carefully gone through the evidence on record. The case of the management is fully proved from the uncontroverted and unchallenged affidavit of management's witness Shri Jose Mathew. Therefore the reference deserves to be answered in favour of the management and against the workmen union without any orders as to costs .

show the step motherly treatment ofthe management . That as per circularNo. 18 of 1966 (Section 58 ) issued by Director General ofMines of Safety, the above two employees are not eligible for the post of instructor. That prior to promotion/conversion of placement of above two employees as VTC Instructor , Shri N.J. Lal , Crane Operator ofKusmundaProject had applied for the above post, but the management had regretted his application and given him in writing that there is no such post lying vacant at Kusmunda whereas the management created such post as VTC Instructor at the same time and promoted to their own employees namely Shrt S.P. Singh and Shri A.K. Choudhary as VTC Instructor which is also a clear violation of the circular mentioned above .It is prayed on behalf of workmen/ union that the above action of the management bedeclared illegal and unjustified and the adequate relief be granted to the workmen Sarva Shri N.J. Lal, Crane Operator, T. Narsingmullu, Shovel Operator, R. U. Singh , Shovel Operator, G.S. Roy Sr. Mechanic & S.C. Sharma Sr. Mechanic so far as the cases of5 employees (workmen) of Kusmunda is concerned.

8. In view ofthe above , the reference is answered in favour ofthe management and against the workmen/union without any orders as to costs holding that the action of SECL, Kusmunda Area in transferring S/ Sh . S.P. Singh , Dumper Operator & A.K. Choudhary, Shovel Operator to VTC in their the then existing capacity grade and scale of pay and subsequently redesignating them as Instructor VTC or " A " as well as converting them from Daily rated to monthly rated without giving opportunity to S/Sh . N.J. Lal , C/ o T. Narsinghmul , Shovel Operator, R.U. Singh, Shovel Operator,G.S. Roy, Sr. Mechanic and S.C. Sharma, Sr. Mechanic is legal and justified and consequently the workmen are not entitled to any relief.

9. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

C. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली, 19 मार्च , 2008

का.आ. 831.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार इलेक्ट्रॉनिक्स रोजनल टेस्ट लैबेराट्री ( ईस्ट) के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , कोलकाता के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 8/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-3-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -42012/322/2003 - आईआर ( सीएम-11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi, the 19th March,2008

3. The case of the management in briefis as follows. That Sarva Shri S.P. Singh and Shri A.K. Choudhary were working as Sr. Dumper Operator Spl . Grade and Shovel OperatorGr. ' A ' at Kusmunda Project since 26-11-86 and 20-6-87 respectively. Shri S.P. Singh was transferred to Kusmunda VTC vide office order dated 13-5-91 . After their transfer to VTC they have been working in VTC and since theyceasedto be in their original cadre of excavation , Shri S.P. Singh and Sliri A.K. Choudhary have been converted to monthly rated cadre as Instructors in the ir present grade i.e. inGr. "A" as per the order of SECL HQ Bilaspur dated 14-7-93. The Union has raised the issue and alleged that both the above workmen have got promotion as VT Instructors by superseding Sarva Shri N.J. Lal Crane Operator, T. Narsingmullu Shovel Operator, R.U. Singh, Shovel Operator,G.S. Roy Sr. Mechanic & S.C. Sharma Sr. Mechanic. The dispute raised by the Union was devoid of any merit, Sarva Shri S.P. Singh and A.K. Choudhary, Sr. Dumper Operator and Shovel Operator respectivelyhave been converted into monthly reated cadre in the same grade i.c. Grade "A" as Instructors . The allegation of the Union that they have been promoted is baseless and mere concoction of facts . In view of the above facts and circumstances, it is submitted that the management has not committed any illegality by re -designated Sarva Shri S.P. Singh and A.K. Choudhary . In view ofthe above , the fiveworkmen are not entitled to any reliefand the action of the management in re- designating Sarva Shri S.P. Singh and A.K. Choudhary be declared as legal and justified.

4. Vide order dated 9-5-04, the case proceeded ex parte against the workman/Union .

S.O. 831.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 8/2005) of the Central Govemment Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court, Kolkata as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between management of Electronics Regional Test Laboratory (East ) and their workmen , received by the Central Goverителя on 19-3-2008.

5. As the case proceeded ex parte against the workman/Union , there is no evidence on record on behalf ofthe workman /Union .

[No. L-42012/322/2003 - IR (CM - II)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer 1802

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008/ CHAITRA 23 , 1930

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA

Reference No. 08 of2005

[PART 1 ]-SEC. 3(ii))

Registered with A/D CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA

20B, Abdul Hamid Street Ist Floor, Kolkata-700069 Dated the 12th March,2008 No. MA-2/99/969

Parties :Employers in relation to the managernent of ElectronicRegional Test Laboratory (East) AND Theirworkmen.

Present: Mr. Justice C.P. Mishra , PresidingOfficer Appearance:

On behalf of the Management : Mr. B. Mukherjee,

Advocate Onbehalfof the Workmen : Mr. A. Bhadury,

TradeUnion Representative State:WestBengal

Industry: Electronic Test Laboratory Dated: 10thMarch, 2008

AWARD

ByOrder No. L-42012/322/2003 - IR(CM- II) dated 28-12-2004the Central Government in exercise of its powers under Section 10( 1 ) (d) and (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 roferred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

To The Secretaryto the Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, Shram Shakti Bhavan, NewDelhi- 110001.

Subject: Misc .Application No. 02 of 1999. IndianOil Corporation Ltd. Employees Organisation Haldia Refinery, P.O. Haldia, Dist . PurbaMidnapore

.........Applicant V/s.

M/s, Indian Oil Corporation Limited,

Haldia Refinery , P.O. Haldia, Dist . PurbaMidnapore

.......Opp . Party Sir,

Under Section 15 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 I submit herewith my Award in the above mentioned application which was filed before this Tribunal under Section 33A of the said Act along with a copy thereof for appropriation action-

Kiridly acknowledge receipt.

Encl . as above

"Whether Sri Bidyut Kumar Biswas and seven others, SecurityGuards in the Estt. of Electronics Regional Test laboratory (East) , Deptt. of Information Technology, STQC Directorate, Kolkata are entitled for regularization of their services in the organization? If yes , to what relief they are entitled ? "

2. When the case is called out today, representative oftheworkmen is absent, but all the 8 concerned workmen arepresent and they file a petition praying for disposal of the present reference by passing a "No Dispute " Award. LeamedAdvocate for the management has no objection.

3. Since the concerned workmen at whose instance the present reference has been made is not interested to proceed further in the matter and has prayed for passing a "No Dispute" Award, this Tribunal has no other alternative butto dispose of the present reference by passing a "No Dispute"Award.

4. A "No Dispute" Award is accordingly passed and the present reference is disposedof.

C. P. MISHRA, Presiding Officer Dated Kolkata

The 10th March, 2008.

Yours faithfully,

(C.P. Mishra) PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली , 19 मार्च , 2008

का.आ. 832,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार आर्केलोजिकल सर्वे ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रष न्यायालय जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई टी/ एल सी/आर/ 117/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , 'जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-3-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/63/1997- आई आर (डी. यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi, the 19th March , 2008

S.O. 832. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. CGIT/ LC/R/ 117 /98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers inrelation to the management of Archaeological Survey of India, and theirworkmen, which was received by the Central Government on 19-3-2008.

[No. L-42012/63/ 1997- IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer 1803 [भाग -खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

ANNEKURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL- COM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

(No. COTT/LC/A/117 /98)

SHRI C. M. SINGH: Presiding Officer

Shri Mohan Singh Sto Shri Kishanlal,

Rio . Chandra Nagar ,

Workitian Uniot

Behirid Kali MataMandir, Koteshwar Road, Gwalior.

disengagement is not arbitrary. TheArchaeological Survey of Indiadoes not fall within the definition ofthe " Industry and the petitioner under the category of "worker" and in such situation, his disengagement from service does not fall under Section 2(oo) of the 1.D. Act, 1947. The petitioner in thepresent case was also engagd as and when the repair/ maintenance works were undertaken by the Archaeological Museum, Gwalior for its proper maintenance which is in the area under their jurisdiction and for which there was no sanctioned post. Under the above circumstances, the case ofthe petitioner is liable to be dismissed.

Versus

Asstt. Supdt. Archaeologist, Archaeological survey of India, Archaeological Museum,

4. The workman in support of his case examined himself.He could not be cross -examined by the management as the right of the managemem to cross- examine him was closed.

Gwalior Fort,Gwalior.

Management

AWARD

Passed on this 28th day of February , 2008

5. The management did not examine any witness as no one appeared for the management and, therefore, the management's evidence was closed.

1. TheGovernment ofIndia, Ministry ofLabour vide itsnotification No. L- 42012/ 63 / 97 - JR/DU) dated 11-06-1998 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

6. I have heard Shri B.P. Singh, advocate for theworkman. As no one put in appearance for the management, therefore, I could not have an opportunity ofhearing the management.

"Whether the action of the management of Asstt. Supdi.,Afthaeological Survey ofIndia in terminating Shri Mohan Singh S/ o Kishan Lal w.c.f. Jun . 1997 is justified? Ifnot, to what reliefthe workman is entitled for?"

7. First of all , it is to be considered as towhether Archaeological Survey of India falls within the deflaition of " Industry" as given in Section 2(j ) of the Industrial DisputeAct , 1947 it has been held in 1997 SC cases (L&S) 1079 in the case of Vidhyarthi and others versus State of Bihar & others that every department of the Government cannot be treated as an "Industry" , " Industry" is defined in the Industrial Disputes Acts , 1947 as under:-

*Industry means any business , trade undertaking, manufacture of calling of employers and includes any calling service, employment, handicraft or industrial occupation or avocation of workman".

TheHon'ble Supreme Court in 1978 (2) S.C.C-213 held that " Industry ", as defined in Section-2 (j ) and explained, hasawide import.

(a) Where ( 1 ) Systematic activity, (ii ) Organisedby co-operation between employer and employee (the direct and substantial element is chimerical) ( ili ) for the production and/or distribution of goods and services calculatedto satisfy human wants and wishes (pot spiritual or religious but inclusive of material things or services geared to celestial bliss e. g. making on a large scale Prasad or food), prima facie, there is an " industry" in that enterprise.

2.The case ofworkman Shri Mohan Singh in briefis as follows: That he was appointed in the year 1986 on daily wages. He was given duty of watchman in the Watch and WardSection ofthe Archaeological Museum, Gwalior Fort, Gwalior (MP). He was allowed to work till 29th January, 1997. No appointment order was given to him because according to the practice of the department, dally wagers are not given any appointment order. His services were terminated byverbal order in the last week of January, 1997 without compliance of the mandatory provisions of Section 25-F of the I.D. Act, 1947 and the relevant rules. The workman had been in continuous service for more than 10 years. He has worked for more than 240 days in preceding 12monthsbefore termination ofhis services. He has been illegally retrenched because the Central Goverrunent has decidedto regularise all daily rated employees. It is prayed bythe workman that the action of termination of service of the workmanhe declared as illegal and void and the direction be given to the management to reinstate him with all full backwages, allowances and other benefits .

(b) Absence ofprofit motive or gainful objective is irrelevant , be the venture in the public, joint, private or other sector.

(c)The true focus is functional and the decisive teat is the nature of the activity with special emphasis on the employer -employee relations .

(d) If the organization is a trade or business itdoes not cease to be one because of philanthropy animating the undertaking.

3.The case ofthe management in brief is as follows: That the Hon'ble Supreme Court has given verdict in a case that the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 -Section 2( J), 2(oo) and 25 (F) will not be applicable against every departments ofthe Government as all such departments cannotbetreated to be an Industry. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has alsoheld that since the petitioner is only daily wage employee and has no right to the post, his

1168 G106-27 1804

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12, 2008 / CHAITRA 23 , 1930

[PART I-SEC.3( ii) ]

नईदिल्ली , 19 मार्च, 2008

8.Having considering the definition of " industry" given in theAct 1947 & explained by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, I am of the considered opinion that Archaeological Survey of India does not fall within the definition of " Industry" as defined under Sec-2 (j ) of the Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 and, therefore , there can be no industrial dispute between the petitioner and the management.

का,आ. 833 ,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूरसंचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सस्कार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई टी/एल सी/आर/ 167/90 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-3-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -40012/ 129/1989-डी-2(बी)/ आई. आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 19th March , 2008

S.O. 833. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/ LC/R/ 167/90 ) of the Central Government Industriał Tribunal-cum -Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19-3-2008 .

[No. L-40012/ 129/ 1989- D- 2(B )/IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

(No. CGIT/LC/R/167/90)

9.There is an affidavit of Shri Mohan Singh on record wherein he has stated that he has continuously worked for 10 years with the management. It is also stated therein that in every calendar year, he has worked for more than 240 days. Ithas been submitted on behalf of the workman that he has been retrenched by the verbal order of the managementwhich is illegal and is not in accordance with Section 25 (F ) ofthe Act of 1947. There is a photocopy of certificate also on record purported to be given by Asstt.. Suptd.,Archaeologist(M ) to Shri Mohan Singh . It is dated 17-07-91 . By the said certificate , it has been certified that Shri Mohan Singh has worked in the organizational work ofthe museum on daily wages from time to time . It does not indicate that he worked for more than 240 days in any calendar year. In (2004)8 SC cases 195, it has been held by theHon'ble Supreme Court that the oral evidence adduced bytheworkman for proving that he worked for more than 240days in a calendar year is not enough . That the burden ofproof lies on the workman to show that he has worked continuously for240 days prior to his alleged retrenchment. In the present case, the workman has not filed any documentary evidence to indicate that he has worked for more than 240 days in any calendar year . He did not even examine any other witness in support ofhis case. Therefore, on the basis oforal testimony of the workman , it cannot be held that he worked for more than 240 days with the management in any calendar year.

....Workman/Union

Presiding Officer : SHRI C. M. SINGH Shri L. D. Sharma, Divisional Secretary, Akhil BhartiyaDoor Sanchar Karmachari Sangh , C.T.O. Compound, Jabalpur

Versus

10. Ithas been admitted by the workman Shri Mohan Singh that he was a dailywager. Since he was a dailywager employee, therefore, he has no right to the post and his disengagement is not arbitrary.

......Management

TheGeneral Manager, Telecommunication, Bhopal . The Sub Divisional Officer, Telegraph, Narsinghpur.

AWARD

Passed on this 31st day of January, 2008 11. In view of the above , I am of the considered opinion that the reference should be decided in favour of the Archaeological Survey of India and against the workman Shri Mohan Singh without any orders as to costs. The reference is , therefore , decided in favour of the management and against the workman without any orders as to costs holding that the action of the managenient Asstt. Suptd. , Archaeological Survey of India in terminating Shri Mohan Singh S/ o Kishan Lai . w.e.f. Jan. , 1997 isjustified and consequently he is not entitled to any relief.

1.The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide its notification No. L- 40012/ 129/ 89 -D -2(B ) ) dated 10-07-1990 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :-

12. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment asper rules.

C. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

"क्या टेलिकम्युनिकेशन , भोपाल ( म.प्र. ) के प्रबंधकों द्वारा श्रमिक श्री गोपाल प्रसाद पटेल आत्मज बाबूलाल पटेल, एक्स श्रमिक की सेषाएं दिनांक 30-04-1988 से समाप्त किए जाने की कार्यवाही न्यायोचित है ? यदि नहीं, तो कर्मकार किस अनुतोष का हकदार है ? " [भाग II खण्ड 3 ( 1 ) ]

2. The case of the workman/Union in brief is as follows. Workman Shri Gopal Prasad Patel was appointed on the post of Telegraph Mazdoor w.e.f. 1-4-85 and was continued in the service upto 30-4-88. His services were terminated without any notice or without paying him the retrenchment compensation as required under Sec-25(f) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. He has worked for more than 240 days in 1986, 1987 & 1988. Therefore his services couldnot have been terminated without following the mandatory provisions of Sec-25 ( f) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.It is prayed that the management be directed to reinstate the workman in service with all back wages andbenefits.

3.The case ofthe management in brief is as follows. The workman was not engaged continuously by the management. It is denied that the workman continuously worked from 1-4-85 to 30-4-88 . The workman was engaged at Narsinghpur but he was not engaged on casual basis continuously. He has not been engaged for a period more than 240 days in a calendar year. Infact the workman left the work on his own voluntarily and did not tum up to serve on muster roll . The workman is , therefore, not entitled forthe reliefclaimed.

4.Vide order dated 18-5-05 passed on the ordersheet ofthis reference, the reference proceeded exparte against theworkman.

1805

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 12, 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

नई दिल्ली , 19 मार्च , 2008

का.आ. 834.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डब्ल्यू, सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 139/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-3-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -22012/65/2002- आई. आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi, the 19th March, 2008

S.O. 834.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.139/ 2002) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Western " Coalfields Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 19-3-2008.

[No. L-22012/65/2002- IR (CM -II)) AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

INTHE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALCUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR (No. CGIT/LC/R/139/2002)

5. As the case proceeded exparte against the workman/Union , there is no evidence on record on behalf ofthe workman/Union .

6. The management in order to prove their case filed affidavit oftheir witness Shri G. P. Yadav, then working as SubDivisional Officer (T), Nagpur .

7. 1 have heard Shri K. P. Pathak, Advocate learned counsel for the management. I have very carefully gone through the evidence on record .

8. The case of the management is fully established and proved from the uncontroverted and unchallenged affidavit of their witness Shri G. P. Yadav , Therefore the reference deserves to be decided in favour of the management and against the workman without any orders as to costs.

9. In view ofthe above, the reference is answered in favour ofthe management and against the workman without any orders as to costs in the following manner:-- "क्या टेलिकम्युनिकेशन , भोपाल ( म.प्र. ) के प्रबंधकों द्वारा श्रमिक श्री गोपाल प्रसाद पटेल आत्मज बाबूलाल पटेल, एक्स श्रमिक की सेवाएं दिनांक 30-04-1988 से समाप्त किए जाने की कार्यवाही न्यायोचित है ? अतः कर्मकार किस अनुतोष का हकदार नहीं है ? " 10. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

C. M. SINGH , PresidingOfficer PresidingOfficer : SHRI C. M. SINGH TheGeneral Secretary. Khadan Mazdoor Sangh ( INTUC) , Pathakhera Area, Distt. Betul (MP) Betul. ...Workman/Union Versus

The ChiefGeneral Manager, Western Coalfields Ltd. , PO: Pathakhera Area, Distt. Betul (MP) Betul.

......Management

AWARD

Passed on this 3rd day ofMarch , 2008

1. TheGovernment of India, Ministry ofLabour vide its notification No. L-22012/65/2002- IR (CM- II ) dated 3-10-2002 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

"Whether the action of the management ofGeneral Manager, Western Coalfields Ltd. in dismissing Sh. Mangal Prasad Soni from service w.e.f. 26-9-2000 is justified? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled?"

2.The case ofworkman/Union in brief is as follows. That workman Shri Mangal Prasad Soni, Token No.426 Shobhapur Mines was posted as Electric Fister-Heiper.He was served with chargesheet dated 20-8-99 alleging therein 1806

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL, 12, 2008/ CHAITRA 23 , 1930

[PART 1 SBC. 3 ( )]

patlont was referred to Nagpur where he got special treatment . The entire medical expenditure i.e. an amount of Rs. 87,479 was spent by the management. The management received anonymous complaint dated 20-12-98 by past addressed to Chief General Manager , WCL, Pathakhera Area intimating the fraud committed by the workman . That on receipt of the said anonymous complaint, a preliminary enquiry was conducted to find out the correctness of the complaint. It is revealed that the complaint received by the management is true . Accordingly workman was issued with a charge sheet No. 677 dated 25/28-02-1999 by the Supdt. OfMines Shobhapur under the provisions of Standing Orderapplicable to the said mines. The workman sutritted his replydated 3-3-95. The reply was found unsatisfactory, accordingly a departmental enquiry was conducted against theworkman legally and property, The Enquiry Officer after conducting the enquiry, submitted the report holding the workman guilty of charges. The Enquiry report dated 20-9-99 is on record. The Competent Authority/DA having examined the enquiry report with reference to the relevant documenta on record the disciplinary sutharity agreed with the findings ofthe enquiry officer and hold that the charges framed against the workman stond proved. Accordingly the workman was issued with a show cause notjer dated 10-9-2000, The workinan submitted representation dated 15-9-2000.As the workman did not show any justification orconvincing defence, the Disciplinary Authority decided to impose the punishment of terminating the services of theworkman .The order oftermination dated 26-9-2000 wae passed against the workman . It is submitted that the workmen is not entitled to any relief.

4.Upon the pleadings of the parties, following leeues were framed on 21-11-05 .

that he got his uncle admitted in the hospital run by the WCL and got him medically treated there for which an amount ofRs . 71,997 ( Rupees Seventy One Thousand Nine Hundred Ninty Seven,only) has been incurred by the management. Since the uncle of the workman was not entitled for free treatment , the workman admitted him showing him as his father. It has been further alleged in the charge that the uncle of delinquent emplołyee died in Hospital at Nagpur where he has been shifted on management's expences and thus the employee committed themisconduct enumerated in Clause 26.1 and 26.22 ofthe Certified StandingOrders . That a departmental enquirywas held and the delinquent employee admitted his guilt in writing. Thus the findings ofholding guilty was submitted bythe EnquiryOfficer on the basis ofwhich the employee has been dismissed from services w.e.f. 26-9-2000. It is averred in the statement of claim that the dismissal of the employee from the services is highly disproportionate to the alleged misconduct and the delinquent employee, as has been proved by the Doctor, the condition ofthe patient was so serious that he needed immediate medical help and since only the family members ofthe employee are entitled for such medical facility the delinquent employee was left with no option except to admit him by showing him as father . Thus the delinquent employee has done that act on humanitarian grounds to save life of his uncle. The Disciplinary Authority ought to have considered this aspect while imposing the penalty and such a harsh punishment ought not to have been imposed . That the enquiry was not held in a legal manner as the principles of natural justice were not followed and proper opportunity was not given to the workman to defend his case, therefore the enquiry has been vitiated and deserves to be quashed, It is prayed by the workman that in the interest ofjustice, the reference may be answered in negative and the management be directed to reinstate the delinquent employee in service.

Whether the Departmental enquiry conducted by the management against the workman is legal and proper ? If not no, whether the management has succeeded in proving the misconduct ofthe workman ?

(ii) To what relief , If my is the workman

entitled?

5. The record reveals that the parties did not load any oral evidence.

6. I have heard Shri Arvind Shrivastava, Advocate for the workman and Shri A. K. Shashi , Advocate for the management,

FINDINGS

7. Issue No. 1 :-The findings on this lacus have been recorded on 11-9-06 . It has been held that the Departmental enquiry conducted by the management is legal and proper, Issue No. 1 is decided socordingly in favour ofthe management and against the workman , The findings on this issue shall forn the part of the award .

3. The case ofthe management in briefis as follows . Theworkman Shri Mangal Prasad Soni , Token No. 426was initially appointedby the management ofWCL, Pathakhera Areaw.c.f. 19-4-1979 as Badli time rated/piece ratedworker and posted at Shobhapur mines . Subsequently,he was regularised as General Mazdoor Category- I w.e.f. 1-3-1980. He was re-designated as Electrical Fitter Helper Cat -IIlby giving the benefit under SLU. That the terms and conditions ofthe employee working at Coal Industry are governedby various settlements generally known as NCWA. That the service conditions are also governed by the Cadre Scheme. CoalMineWorkers are given various facilities such as free accommodation, free fuel, free water supply, free medical aid etc. As far as free medical aid is concerned, the same is regulated by medical attendance rules and is available to the family members of the employee . On 18-10-98 at PathakheraArea Hospital , the workman admitted his uncle namelyBisen in the name of his father Shri Gannu . The

8. Issue No. 2 -The loaned counsel for the workman submitted that the punishment of dismissal from 1807 [भाग ॥खण्ड 3 ( i ) )

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12 , 2008/ चैत्र 23 , 1930

against theworkman without any orders as to costs holding that the action of the management of General Manager, Western Coalfields Ltd. in dismissing Sh. Mangal Prasadi. Soni from service w.e.f. 26-9-2000 is justified and consequently the workman is not entitled to any relief.

10. Findings on Issue no. 1 shail form the part of

award.

11. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules .

C. M. SINGH , PresidingOfficer

नईदिल्ली, 19 मार्च , 2008

का, आ. 835, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. ई. सो. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक अधिकरण जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 136/1994 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-3-2008 को प्राप्त हुआा था।

[सं. एल-22012/119/1994- आई. आर. ( सी- ॥ ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi, the 19th March,2008

8.0. $35. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Govemment hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 136/ 1994) of the Central Government industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SECL . and their workman, which was, receivedbythe Contzal Govemment on 19-3-2008.

[No. L-22012/119/ 1994-HR (C- II)] AJAYKUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer !

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

(N CGITALCR/136/ 1994)

PresidingOfficer: Shri C. M. Singh

TheArea General Secretary,

R.K.K.M.S. (INTUC

At: QuatrerNo. C/121 ,

Workman/Union

POKorba, DisttBilaspur.

Subhash Block, SECL, Versus

TheSr. Supdt.,

Central Electrical and Mechanical Workshop,

S.B.C.L. Korba,

PO.Karta Colliery,

Management

Distt.Bilashpur.

services imposed on the workman is shockingly disproportionateto the misconduct of the workman. He requested that powers under Sec- 11 -A ofthe 1.D. Act 1947 be invoked and the worknsan be reinstated in servicewith some lesser punishment . He also submitted that had he not shown his uncle as his father in the Company's hospital, his unele would not have been admitted in the hospital and would have died at that time only . That the workman has tried his best to save the life of his uncle though he did not succeed ultimately. In such circumstances even assuming that the workman committed breach of rules his conduct was not such so as to warrant punishment of dismissal from services . Against the above, the leamed counsel for the management submitted that the workman has committed fraud and dishonesty and such a person is not entitled to be retained in service and therefore the action of the management in terminating the services ofworkman is legal, proper and proportionate to the gravity of misconduct proved against him . The learned counsel for the management also submitted that it is no part of the function of the tribunal to substitute its own decision when enquiry isheld in accordance with rules and punishment is imposed by the authorities considering all the relevant circumstances andwhich it is entitled to impose . In this respect, he placed reliance on 1998-1 - LLJ-431 in the case ofUOI and others verus Shrivastava B.K. I have gone through the law cited above. The submission of the learned counsel for the management that it is no part ofthe function oftribunal to aphstitute its own decision when the enquiry is held in apcordancewith the rules and the punishment is imposed by the authorities considering all the relevant pircumstances and which it is entitled to impose is quite correct . The learned counsel for the management further submitted that appording to lew laid down by the Hon'ble HighCourt of Kerala in the case of Caltex India Ltd. versus Labour Court Quilon and others reported in 1966-11 - LJ -416 the dismissal cannot be set aside by Labour Court unless the court finds that the dismissal was without good faith or aма result of intimidation or unfair labour practice or that the wapodare adopted is against rules of natural justice and matly when on the materials the finding is completely baseless and perverse. I have very carefully gone through the law pitad shore . The submission made by the learned pounsel for the management is according to the law cited shove, Under the acts and circumstances of this case, Am of the considered opinion that there is no need of interferencewith the punishment imposed on the workman by the pranagement. Josue No. 2 is, therefore, decided in favour ofthe management and against the workman holding that the warkman is not entitled to any relief. But sonsidering the facts and circumstances of the case, it would be benh to impose couts on the workman . Therefore there shall be no ordem ad te couts,

AWARD

Passed on this 19th day of February, 2008 9. In view of the findings on Issues No. 1 & 2, the reference is decided in favour of the management and 1808

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 12 , 2008 / CHAITRA 23 , 1930

[PART I-Sec. 3(ii) ) 1. The Government of India, Ministry ofLabour vide its notification No. L-22012/119 /94- IR ( C - II ) dated 18-8-94 has referred the following dispute for adjudication bythis tribunal:

unauthorisely in a plastic bag under the seat of his cycle. The reply ofthe workman to the aforesaid charge was not found satisfactory and hence a departmental enquirywas conducted against him . After having considered the findings of the Enquiry Officer and the other material on record, the Disciplinary Authority imposed the following punishment on the workman .

"Whether the following demands of R.K.K.M.S. (INTUC) union in respect of Shri Manjoor Ali , Ex- Fitter Gr. I of Central E & M Workshop and present Sr. Mech . Group A Gevra Project arejustified? Ifso, towhat reliefs Shri Manjoor Ali is entitled to?

Demand No. 1. Payment of full salary of the period from 14-5-86 to 13-8-86.

2 Restorationof Basic Pay@ Rs . 47.73 per day from 24-8-86

"Revision of Shri Manjoor Ali . Fitter Gr.J. Token No. 58. Autocar-shop, Central Workshop. Korba to-the lower stage in the same grade/ scale of pay i.e. , he is reverted from his existing basic pay of Rs. 47.83 per day in the Excavation Category 'B' pay scale of Rs. 31.99-1 . 76-56.63 per day (NCWA - III ) to the basic pay of Rs . 31,99 per day in the same NCWA - III per scale of Rs . 31.99-1 , 76-56.63 per day w.e.f. 24th August 1986 ".

3. Promotion to the post of Sr. Mech.Group- Aw.e.f.28-2-87

4. Transfer back to Central E & M Workshop from Gevra Project."

4. My learned predecessor in office vide his order dated 12-5-04, recorded his findings on preliminary issues No. 1 & 2. He decided Issue No. I against the worunan holding that enquiry proceedings do not suffer from any infirmity and the same was conducted by observing the principles of natural justice . Regarding Issue No. 2, my learned predecessor in officer held that so far as Issue No. 2 is concerned, the worker has not led any evidence to support his case. He decided Issue No. 2 holding that the enquiry report is not perverse as alleged by the workтал . He specifically held that Issue No. 2 is decided accordingly against the workman . The findings dated 12-5-04 on Issues No. 1 & 2 ofmy leamed predecessor in office shall form the part of this award.

FINDINGS ON ISSUE No. 3

2. The case of the workman /Union in brief is as follows. That Shri Manjoor Ali Sr. Mechanic Group "A" was working in Central E/ M workshop , SECL , Korba .On 14-5-86, he was placed under suspension for the alleged commission of theft of management's property. It' is said thathe had committed theft of 33 rubber ' O' rings forwhich he was issued a chargesheet and a departmental enquiry was conducted against him . The allegation of the workman is that the departmental enquiry was not conducted against him properly and legally as he was not given proper opportunity to defend his case. The charges levelled against the workman were found fully proved by the Enquiry Officer and consequently he recorded his findings holding the workman guilty of all the charges . The Disciplinary Authority after considering the findings recorded, by the EnquiryOfficer and the other material on record vide order dated22-23-8/86 imposed the following punishment on the workman-

5. I have heard Shri A.K. Shashi , Advocate the learned counsel for the management on Issue No. 3. I could not have an opportunity of hearing the counsel for the workman as inspite of sufficient service of notice , no one put in appearance for the workman .

6. After having heard the learned counsel for the management, I have very carefully gone through the record . Issue No. 3 is as follows:-

"To what relief, if any , is the workman entitled to ? " "Revision ofShri Manjoor Ali, FitterGr. I, TokenNo. 58, Autocar- shop , Central Workshop, Korba to the lower stage in the same grade/scale of pay ie. , he is reverted from his existing basic pay of Rs . 47.83 per day in the Excavation Category ' B ' pay scale ofRs . 31.99-1 , 76-56.63 per day (NCWA - III ) to the basic pay of 31.99 per day in the same NCWA - III pay scale of Rs . 31.99-1 , 76-56.63 per day w.e.f. 24th August 1986" .

In view ofthe findings of my learned predecessor in office on Issues No. 1 & 2 , it is concluded that the workman is not entitled to any relief. Issue No. 3 is decided accordingly in favour of the management and against the workman.

The workman has sought the relief as he shouldbe awarded the full salary w.e.f. 14-5-86 to 13-8-86 , restoration ofBasic Pay@Rs. 47.83 per day from 24-8-86 . Promotion to the post ofSr. Mech . Group- A w.e.f. 28-2-87 & transfer back to the Central E & M Workshop from Gevra Project. "

7. In view of findings on Issue Nos. 1 to 3 , the reference is answered in favour of the management and against the workman/Union without any orders as to costs holding the following demands of R.K.K.M.S. ( INTUC) Unionin respect ofShri Manjoor Ali, Ex -Fitter Gr. 1 of Central E& M Workshop and present Sr. Mech. Group A Gevra Project are notjustified.

Demand No. 1. Payment of full salary of the period from 14-5-86 to 13-8-86.

3. Themanagement's case in brief is as follows . That Shri Manjoor Ali was working at Central E & M Workshop, Korba, as Fitter Gr -l . He was issued with a chargesheet. The charges levelled against him was that " it was reported that on 28-4-86, while he was on duty in the general shift , he was found carrying 33 numbers of rubber ' O' rings [भाग II खण्ड 3 (ii) ] .

2. Restoration of Basic Pay @ Rs . 47.73 per day from24-8-86

3. Promotion to the post of Sr. Mech . Group-A w.e.f. 28-2-87

4. Transfer back to Central E & M Workshop fromGevraProject."

Consequently the workman is not entitled to any relief. The findings dated 12-5-04 on issue No. 1 & 2 recorded by my learned predecessor in office shall form the part of this award.

8. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Govertument ofIndia, Ministry ofLabour and Employment asper rules.

C. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 31 मार्च, 2008

का.आ. 836. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 कां 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद‌द्वारा 01 अप्रैल , 2008 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 ( धारा 76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ) के उपबन्ध तमिलनाडू राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात, "करूर जिले के करूर सीमा के अन्तर्गत राजस्व गांव वेल्लियानै - दक्षिणा , वैल्लियानै- उत्तर, पिच्चम्पट्टी के अधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र ।"

[सं. एस-38013/17/2008-एस.एस. -1 ] एस. दो. जेवियर, अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 31st March, 2008

S.O. 836. In exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State

1809

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 12 , 2008/चैत्र 23 , 1930

Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government herebyappoints the 1st April , 2008 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter VandVI ( except sub-section (i) ofSection 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force) ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Tamil Nadu namely:-

"Areas comprising the Revenue Villages ofVelliyanai South, Velliyanai North , Pitchampatty in peripheral areas ofKarur of Karur District .

[No. S- 38013/17/2008-SS.I ] S.D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

शुद्धि-पत्र नई दिल्ली, 4 अप्रैल, 2008

का.आ. 837. भारत के राजपत्र के भाग II , खण्ड-3 ( ii ) में दिनांक 7 दिसम्बर, 2002 को अंग्रेज़ी में प्रकाशित अधिसूचना संख्या सां. आ.सं. 3833 तथा हिन्दी में प्रकाशित अधिसूचना संख्या सां. आ.सं. 3822 में क्रम संख्या 30 पर श्री एस. के. बागची , उप निदेशक , खान सुरक्षा (खनन ) के नाम को ' श्री एस. बागची ' पढ़ा जाए । [सं. एस -29025/5/2002-आई.एस.एच. II (पार्ट फाईल ) ] सुभाष चन्द, अवर सचिव CORRIGENDUM New Delhi, the 4th April , 2008 S.D. 837 ,-In the Notification S.O. No. 3833 in English and S.O. No. 3822 in Hindi published in the Gazette of India Part II , Section 3 ( ii) dated 7th December , 2002, the name of Shri S.K. Bagchi , DDMS (Mining ) of Sl . No. 30 may be read as 'Shri S. Bagchi' .

[No. S-29025/5/2002- ISH . 11 (Pan File)] SUBHASH CHAND, Under Secy.

Printed by the Manager , Govt . of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064

and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi 110054.