This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्री सं. डॉ. एल. ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

REGD. NO . D. L. ( N) 04/ 0007/2003- भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 16]

नई दिल्ली, अप्रैल 13 अप्रैल 19 , 2008 , शनिवार/चैत्र 24-चैत्र 30 , 1930

NEW DELHI , APRIL 13 APRIL 19 , 2008 , SATURDAY/CHAITRA24-CHAITRA30, 1930

No. 161

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

SeparatePaging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग 11-खण्ड 3 - उप-खण्ड (ii ) PART I-Section 3-Sub-section ( l )

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए साविधिक आदेश और अभिसूचनाएं StatutoryOrders and Notifications Issuedby the Ministries of the Government of India fOther than the Ministry of Defence)

स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय (स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण विभाग ) नई दिल्ली , 28 मार्च , 2008

का.आ. 838.-भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 (1956का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में एत‌द्वारा निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्:-

वस्त अनुसूची में " राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय बेंगलूर , कनार्टक " के सामने शीर्षक " मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता" [स्तम्भ ( 2 ) में] के अन्तर्गत तथा शीर्षक ' पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण' [ स्तसम्म ( 3 ) में ) के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित रखा जाएगा अर्थात्:-

(2)

(3)

बैचलर ऑफ मेडिसिन एंड एम.बी.बी.एस.

बैबुलर ऑफ सर्जरी

( यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अहंता होगी यदि यह बसवेश्वर मेडिकल कालेज , चित्रदुर्ग , कर्नाटक में प्रशिक्षित छात्रों के संबंध में राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय ,

बेंगलूर, कर्नाटक द्वारा वर्ष 2006 से प्रदान की गई हां )

[सं. यू-12012/112//1999- एमई (पी- II ) ]

एम. बारिक, अवर सचिव 1284-G1 /08

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (Department ofHealth and Family Welfare) New Delhi , the 28th March , 2008

S.O. 838. In exercise ofthe powers conferredby sub-section (2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said First Schedule against "Rajiv Gandhi University ofHealth Sciences, Bangalore, Kamataka " unsier theheading ' Recognized Medical Qualification ' [ in column (2) ) and under the heading Abbreviation for Registration" [in column (3), the following shall be inserted, namely:

(3)

(2)

M.B.B.S.

Bachelor ofMedicine

and Bachelor ofSurgery (This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by Rajiv Gandhi University ofHealth Sciences, Bangalore, Karnatakawith the effect from the year 2006 in respect of students trained at Barveshwara Medical College, Chitradurga, Karтимака)

[No. U -12012/ 112/1999- ME (F- 1 )] N. BARIK, Under Secy,

(1811) 1812

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19, 2008/CHAITRA 30, 1930

नई दिल्ली, 8 अप्रैल, 2008

25-09-2010 तक भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् सदस्य के रूप में निर्विरोध निर्वाचित किया जाता है :-

का. आ. 839.-भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 (1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में बरहामपुर विश्वविद्यालय की सीनेट द्वारा डा. जी.सी. समल कायचिकित्सा संकाय सदस्य , बरहामपुर विश्वविद्यालय को दिनांक 26-09-2005 से भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् के सदस्य के रूप में निर्वाचित किया गया है।

अतः अब, उक्त अधिनियम, की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में , केन्द्र सरकार एतद्‌द्वारा भारत सरकार के तत्कालीन स्वास्थ्य मंत्रालय की दिनांक 9 जनवरी , 1960 की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 138 में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करतो है अर्थात्:-

उक्त अधिसूचना में " धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड (ख) के अधीन निर्वाचित " शीर्षक के अंतर्गत क्रम संख्या 39 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी , अर्थात्: -

" 39. डा. राधा माधब त्रिपाठी, बरहामपुर विश्वविद्यालय "

सह प्रोफेसर ,

जबकि बरहामपुर विश्वविद्यालय ने सूचित किया है कि डा.. जी.सी. समल जो भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 की धारा 3 ( 1 ) ( ख ) के अन्तर्गत बरहामपुर विश्वविद्यालय का प्रतिनिधित्व कर रहे हैं, की दिनांक 30-4-2006 से बरहामपुर विश्वविद्यालय के चिकित्सा संकाय की सदस्यता समाप्त हो गई है। अतएव , डा. जी.सी. समल की बरहामपुर विश्वविद्यालय का प्रतिनिधित्व करने वाली भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् की सदस्यता समाप्त हो गई है।

सामुदायिक चिकित्सा विभाग , एम के सी जी मेडिकल कालेज बरहामपुर ( उड़ीसा)

[सं. बी -11013/ 1 //2007- एम ई ( नीति-1 ) ] एस. क. गुप्ता , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 8th April , 2008

अतः अब , उक्त अधिनियम , की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में डा. जी.सी. समल द्वारा इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से बरहामपुर विश्वविद्यालय का प्रतिनिधित्व करने वाली भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् की सदस्यता को समाप्त हुआ माना जाए।

[सं. वी. - 11013/1 //2007 -एम ई ( नीति-1 ) ] एस. के. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 8th April , 2008

S.O. 840. Whereas in pursuance of the provision ofsub -section ( 1 ) (b) ofthe Section 3 ofthe Indian Medicat Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) Dr. Radha Madhab Tripathy, Associate Professor, Department ofCommunity Medicine, MKCG Medical College , Berhampur (Orissa), a member of the faculty of Medicine , Berhampur University has been elected unopposed by the Senate of the Berhampur Universityto be a member of the Medical Council of India with effect from date of issue of this notification upto 25-09-2010

S.O. 839. Whereas in pursuance of the provision ofsub -section ( 1 ) (b) of the Section 3 ofthe Indian Medical Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) Dr. G.C. Samal , a member ofthe faculty ofMedicine, Berhampur University has been elected bythe Senate of the Berhampur University to be a member of the Medical Council of India with effect from 26-09-2005.

Now, therefore, in pursuance ofthe provision of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, the Central Govemment hereby makes the following further amendment in the Notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry. ofHealth number $ .O . 138 dated the 9th January , 1960, namely:

Whereas the Berhampur University has informed that Dr. G.C. Samal who is representing Berhampur University under Section 3 ( 1 )(b ) of IMC Act, 1956 has ceased to be a member of medical faculty of Berhampur Universitywith effect from 30-04-2006. Therefore, Dr.G.C. Samal has ceased to be a member of Medical Council of India representing Berhampur University.

In the said Notification, under the heading "Elected under clause (b) of sub- section (1 ) of Section 3 " , against serial number 39 , the following entries shall be substituted, namely:

"39. Dr. Radha Madhab Tripathy Berhampur university"

Associate Professor

Now, therefore, in pursuance ofthe provision of sub- section (3 ) of section 7 ofthe said Act , Dr. G.C. Samal shall be deemed to have ceased to be a member of the Medical Council of India representing Berhampur University, with effect from the date of issue of this notification .

[No. V- 11013/1 /2007-ME ( Policy-1) ] S. K. GUPTA , Under Secy.

Department ofCommunity Medicine MKCG Medical College Berhampur (Orissa)

नई दिल्ली , 8 अप्रैल , 2008

[No. V- 11013/ 1 /2007 -ME (Policy- 1 )]

S. K. GUPTA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 9 अप्रैल , 2008

का.आ. 841.-दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदय शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् के साथ कर.आ. B40.-भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 (1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) ( ख) के अनुसरण में डा. राधा माधव त्रिपाठी , सह प्रोफेसर, सामुदायिक चिकित्सा विभाग , एम के सी जी मेडिकल कालेज बरहामपुर (उड़ीसा ) , कार्यचिकित्सा संकाय सदस्य, बरहामपुर विश्वविद्यालय को बरहामपुर विश्वविद्यालय की सीनेट द्वारा इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से [भाम II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

परामर्श करने के पश्चात, तक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखत संशोधन करती है :-

2. डा. आर.एम.एल. अवध विश्वविद्यालय , फैजाबाद ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) के संबंध में दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16) को अनुसूची के भाग-1 में क्रम संख्या 55 के समक्ष कॉलम 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों के नीचे निम्नलिखत प्रविष्टियां शामिल कीजाएंगी:-

"III . अवध दंत चिकित्सा विज्ञान संस्थान , लखनक

( i ) दत्त सर्जरी में स्नातक बीडीएस , डा. आर. एम. एल, अवध विश्व- विद्यालय , फैजाबाद ( उत्तर प्रदेश)

(यदिशिक्षण संत्र 2000-2001 के दौरान दाखिल हुए विद्यार्थियों को ही प्रदान की जाती है )

[एफ सं. बी-12017/20/ 1997-डीई ]

राज सिंह , अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 9th April , 2008 S.O. 841. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) ofSection 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 (16 of1948), the Central Government, after consultation with Dental Council of India, hereby, makes the following amendments in Part- 1 of the Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

2.Under theexisting entries ofcolumn 2 & 3 against Serial No. 55, in part -I ofthe Schedule to the Dentists Act , 1948 (16 of 1948) pertaining to Dr. RMLAvadh University Faizabad (U.P. ), the following entries shall be inserted thereunder:-

"III . Avadh Institute of Dental

Sciences, Lucknow.

B.D.S. ,Dr. RML (i)Bachelor of Dental Surgery

Avadh University, (Ifgranted to students admitted

Faizabad (U.P.) cduring the academic Session

2000-2001 only)

[F. No. V- 12017/20/ 1997-DE) RAJ SINGH, Under Secy.

मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय

( उच्चतर शिक्षा विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 9 अप्रैल , 2008

का.आ. 842. सार्वजनिक परिसर ( अवैध कब्जे खाली कराना ) अधिनियम , 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का उपयोग करते हुए भारत सरकार , मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय श्री दीपक वत्स , सहायक रजिस्ट्रार ( सम्पदा ) , दिल्ली विश्वविद्यालय जो केन्द्र सरकार के राजपत्रित अधिकारी की रैंक के समतुल्य अधिकारी है , को उपर्युक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनार्थ सम्पदा अधिकारी नियुक्त करती है और वे दिल्ली विश्वविद्यालय के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के तहत और दिल्ली की स्थानीय सीमाओं के अन्दर आने वाले सार्वजनिक परिसरों के संबंध में उपर्युक्त अधिनियम द्वारा अथवा इसके तहत सम्पदा अधिकारी के रूप में प्रदान की गई शक्तियों का उपयोग करेंगे और दायित्वों का निर्वहन करेंगे ।

[संख्या एफ. 4-31/2007 डेस्क(यू~)] प्रेम कुमार, अवर सचिव

1813

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19 , 2008/चैत्र 30 , 1930

MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT. (Department ofHigher Eduction)

NewDelhi, the 9th April , 2008

S.O. 842. In exercise ofthe powers conferred by Section 3 of thePublic Premises (Eviction ofUnauthorised Occupants)Act, 1971 (40 of 1971 ), the Governement of India, Ministry ofHuman Resource Development hereby appoints. Shri Deepak Vats, Assistant Registrar (Estates), Delhi University, being an officer equivalent to the rank of a gazetted officer of Central Government , as Estate Officer for the purpose of the said Act, and he shall exercise the powers conferred, and perform the duties imposed, on the EstateOfficer by or under the said Act in respect ofthe public premises within the local limits ofDelhi and under: the administrative control ofUniversity ofDelhi .

[No. F.4-31 /2007-Desk (U)) PREM KUMAR, Under Secy.

संधार और सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय (दूरसंचार विभाग ) (राजभावा अनुभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 3 अप्रैल , 2008

का.आ. 843. केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों का लिए प्रयोग ) नियम 1976 ( यथा संशोधित 1987 ) के नियम 10 ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में संचार और प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय , दूरसंचार विभाग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालय को, जिसमें 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिंदी कां कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , एतदद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है । मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , लैंड लाइन , महानगर टेलीफोन निगम

लिमिटेड, मुंबई

महाप्रबंधक , ( काल सेंटर ) महानगर टेलीफोन निगम लिमिटेड, मुंबई

[सं. ई 11016/1 /2007 - रा.मा. (पार्ट-1 ) ] कीर्ति कुमार , उप महानिदेशक ( समन्वय एवं प्रशासन) MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

(Department of Telecommunications) New Delhi, the 3rd April ,2008

5.0. 843.-In pursuance ofrule 10 (4) ofthe Official Language (Use for Official Purpose ofthe Union), Rules; 1976(as amended- 1987) , the Central Government hereby notifies the following office under the administrative control of the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, Department of Telecommunications where. more than 80% ofStaffhave acquired working knowledge ofHindi.

ChiefGeneral Manager, Land Line, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited, Mumbai

General Manager (Call Centre) Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited, Mumbai

[No. Ε. 11016/ 1 /2007-0.L (Part -1) KIRTHY KUMAR, Dy. Director General (Coordination & Administration)

Γ 1814

[PART 11 SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19 , 2008 / CHAITRA 30 , 1930

उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 26 फरवरी, 2008

का. आ. 844, -केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 610 ) तथा बाट और माप मानकः (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त पॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अत्तः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 को उपधारा ( 7 ) और (8 ) द्वारा प्रदन शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स डाइटी सकेल्स, साई बिल्डिंग , बलूसेरी - मुक्कू, कालीकट-673623 , केरल द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यःवार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " डीएसपीएफ " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " डाइटी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/131 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसको अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेवतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 2.30 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकन लिए सोलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और पॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री, यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त पॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही पेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 ×10 , 2×10 अथवा 5 × 10 , के हैं. जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फ... सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 58 ) /2007]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1815

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19, 2008 /चैत्र 30, 1930

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ü ) ]

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department ofConsumer Affairs)

New Delhi , the 26th February, 2008

S.O. 844. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of. sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions; :

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of self indicating non - automatic (Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " DSPF " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class- III ) and with brand name " DIETY" (herein referred to as the said model), manufactured by M/s. Deity Scales , Sai Building , Balussery -Mukku , Calicut - 673623 , Kerala and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/131;

The said Model is a strain gauge type. load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 4 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 200 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent sabtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and. 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram , working principle, etc. before or after sale .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferredby sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument ofsame series with maximum capacity above 50 kg. and up to 5000 kg . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10 ; k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (58 )/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC . 3( i)) 1816

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19 , 2008/CHAITRA 30, 1930

नई दिल्ली, 26 फरवरी , 2008

का. आ. 845. - केन्द्रीय सरकार को , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाटऔर माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः, अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स डी एस सिस्टम्स , रूम नं. 3 , प्लाट नं. 15/5168 ( सी ) , श्री कृष्ण भवन , सी टी सी रोड, कल्पना स्क्वेयर , भुवनेश्वर -751006 उड़ीसा द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " वी टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेनिज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " विषाय " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/312 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( येव्रिज प्रकार ) का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) 10 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । द्रव क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विधुत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम, निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शतों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 प्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 200 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और ' ई ' मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 * अथवा 5× 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 156) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूधम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1817

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19 , 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

New Delhi, the 26th February , 2008

S.O. 845. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with theprovisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge type ) with digital indication of " VT" series belonging to medium accuracy (Accuracy class- III ) and with brand name "VISHAY" (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. DS Systems, Room No. 3, Plot No. 15/5168(c), Sri Krishna Bhawan, CTC Road, Kalpana Square , Bhubaneswar- 751006, Orissa and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/07/312;

The saidModel is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing Instrument (weighbridge type) with a maximum capacity of50 tonne and minimum capacity of200 kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 10kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Liquid Crystal Diode (LCD) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design, circuit diagram, working principle, etc.before or after sale.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of same make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 200 tonhe with verification scale foterval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 58. or more andwith 'e' value of 1x10, 2x10 or 5x10%, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model bas been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (156)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1818

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19, 2008/ CHAITRA 30 , 1930

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2008

का. आ. 846, केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ज्योति इलैक्ट्रोनिक सर्विसिज , एस एस 11 , 485 , सैक्टर -6 , कोपरकैरन, न्यू मुंबई, महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग-1 ) वाले " जे वाई जे " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ज्योति" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/355 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का पार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ना. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रप्. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शतप्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्टऔर, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री, यथार्थता , डिजाइन, सर्किट डायग्राम, निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शतों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का विशिष्ट स्कीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और वसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापयान अंतराल ( एम ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. की अधिकत्तम क्षमता वाले हैंऔर ' ई' मान 1× 10 % , 2× 10 * अथवा 5× 10 %, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 201 )/2007 ] आर. माधुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1819

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19 , 2008/चैत्र 30 , 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 5th March , 2008

S.O. 846. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions,

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Ceritral Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type ) with digital indication of " JYJ " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class II ) and with brand name " JYOTHI " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Jyothi Electronic Services, SS - II , 485, Sector -6 , Koparkaime , New Mumbai , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/355;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-authomatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verification scale interval (e) is 2 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

PROTTE

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument ofsimilar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg, and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for 'e' value of 1 mg. to 50 mg , and with number of verificationscale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100 mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10%, 2x10 or 5 × 10%, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufacturedby the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

(F. No. WM- 21 (201 )/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1284G1/2008-2 1820

[PART I -SEC. 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19,2008 /CHAITRA 30, 1930

नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2008

का. आ. 847.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ज्योति इलैक्ट्रोनिक सर्विसिज , एस एस 11 , 485 , सैक्टर -6, कोपरकैरन , न्यू मुंबई, महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " जे वाई टी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरणा ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम "ज्योति" है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/356 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचासित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 बोल्ट और , 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का स्कीम डायग्राम

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन, सर्किट द्वायग्राम , निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शतों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का विशिष्ट स्कीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी बिनिमांता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के ' ई' मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और 'ई' मान 1 ×10*, 2×10 * अथवा 5 × 105 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 201 ) /2007] आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1821 [भाग -खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19 , 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

New Delhi , the 5th March, 2008

S.O. 847. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of. Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rutes, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ; Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with digital indication of " JYT" series of medium accuracy ( ассигису class- III) and with brand name " JYOTHI " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Jyothi Electronic Services, SS- II , 485 , Sector-6 , Koparkairne , New Mumbai , Maharashtra and which is assignell the approval mark IND/09/07/356;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - authomatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with amaximum capacity of 30 kg. and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Fig. 2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Inaddition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design, circuit diagram, working principle, etc. before or after sale . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model is given above.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of same make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg. and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 100 mg. to 2 g . or with verification scale inerval (n) ia the range of500to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10%, 2× 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positivé or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (201 )/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology.

1822

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19, 2008/CHAITRA 30 , 1930

नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2008

का. आ. 848, केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि'उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः, अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ज्योति इलैक्ट्रोनिक सर्विसिज, एस एस II , 485 , सैक्टर-6, कोपरकैरन , न्यूमुबई, महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग-III ) वाले " जे वाई पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ज्योति" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/357 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का स्कीम डायग्राम

स्यम्मिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन, सर्किट डायग्राम , निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का विशिष्ट स्कीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही येक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन तुपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और ' ई ' मान 1× 10*, 2× 10* अधवा 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (201 )/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1823 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19, 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

NewDelhi , the 5th March ,2008

S.O. 848. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfled that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights ind Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periodi of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36. of the smid Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self indicating non-automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of " JYP " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " JYOTHI " (hereinafter referred to as the said model), manufactured by M/s. Jyothi Electronic Secvices , SS- II , 485, Sector - 6, Koparkairne , New Mumbai , Maharashtra and which is assighed the approval mark IND/09/07/357;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - authomatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 2 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 100 g. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Fig. 2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

In addition to sealing the stamping plate , sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design, circuit diagram, working principle , etc. before or after sale . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is glven above.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument ofsame series with maximum capacity above 50 kg. and up to 5000 Kg, and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the pange of500 to 10,000 for'e ' value of 5 g. or more and with ' e' value of 1× 10 , 2x10 or 5x10 , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer with the saine principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (201)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1824

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19, 2008/CHAITRA 30, 1930

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च , 2008

का. आ. 849,-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सीलटेक इंडस्ट्रीज , नं. 162/5 नीयर बस स्टाप , त्रिवेणी नगर ( तलवडे ) , पुणे-412114 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग एक्स ( 1 ) वाले " एस डब्ल्यूपी " श्रृंखला के आटोमेटिक ग्रेविमैट्रिक फिलिंग इंस्ट्रूमेंट ( वे फिलर प्रकार ) के भॉइल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सीलरेक " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/235 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत पेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग ( वे फिलर ) ऑगर एटैचमेंट सहिच उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि.ग्रा. है इसकी अधिकतम फिल दर 20 फिल्स प्रति मिनट है । मशीन को फ्री फ्लोइंग उत्पादों जैसे बिस्कुट, पाउडर, दालें , अनाजों, मसाले , चाय, चीनी , चावल , बीजों आदि की फिलिंग के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और , 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उनकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम, निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शतों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (62) /2007 ]

आर माथुरखूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1825

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19 , 2008/चैत्र 30 , 1930

[भाग खण्ड (i ) ]

NewDelhi, the 5th March,2008

S.O. 849. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with theprovisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferted by sub-sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Atomatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument (Weigh filler ) belonging to accuracy class X ( 1 ) of " SWP " series with brand nanje "SEALTEC (herein referred to as the said model), manufactured by M/s. Sealtec Industries, No. 162/5 Near Bus Stop, Triveni Nagar (Talwade), Pune-412 114, Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/235;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based Authomatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument (Weigh filler) . Its maximum capacity is 10 kg. Its maximum fill rate is 20 fills per minute. The machine is designed for filling the free flowing products like biscuit, powder, pulses , grains , spices , tea , sugar rice, seeds etc. The Light Emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping piste, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagrlim, working principle, etc.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government bereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said mode! shall also cover the weighing instruntent of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with capacity in the range of 10 g. to 10 kg. manufactured bythe same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (62)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1826

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 19 , 2008/ CHAITRA 30 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2008

का. आ. 850,-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित्त प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अत्तः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सीतटेक इंडस्ट्रीज , नं. 162/5 नीयर बस स्टाप , त्रिवेणी नगर ( तलवडे) , पुणे-412114 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग एक्स ( 1 ) वाले " एस डब्ल्यू ए पी "श्रृंखला के आटोमेटिक ग्रेषिमैट्रिक फिलिंग इंस्ट्रूमेंट ( वे फिलर ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सौलटेक " है (जिसे इसधैं इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/07/ 236 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग ( वे फिलर ) ऑगर एटैचमेंट सहित उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि.ग्रा. है इसकी अधिकतम फिल दर 20 फिल्स प्रति मिनट है । मशीन को नॉन- फ्री फ्लोइंग उत्पादों जैसे पाउडर , मैदा, आटा आदि की फिलिंग के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्टऔर, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्यपिग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में इसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम, निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शती पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 62 )/2007 ] आर. माथुरश्रूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1827 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19, 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

NewDelhi , the 5th March, 2008

S.O. 850. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred . by sub- sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument ( Weigh filler ) belonging to accuracy class X ( 1 ) of " SWAP" series with brand name ; "SEALTEC" (herein refferred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Sealtec Industries , No. 162/5 Near Bus Stop, Triveni Nagar (Talwade), Pune -412 114 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 07/236M;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based Authomatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument (Weigh filler) along with auger attachment . Its maximum capacity is 10 kg. Its maximum fill rate is 20 fills per minute. The machine is designed for filling the non - free flowing products Such as powers , maida, atta. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shalt also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material, accuracy, design, circuit diagram, working principle, etc.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with capacity in the range of 10 g. to 10 kg. manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

(F. No. WM-21 (62)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1284Gl/2008-3 1828

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19,2008 /CHAITRA 30, 1930

[PART 1 Sec . 3( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 7 मार्च , 2008

का. आ. 851. - केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स शिवा इंजीनियरिंग कार्पोरेशन, ए-8 , ग्राउंड फ्लोर , लाल बिल्डिंग , शिवाजी मार्ग , राउरकेला-769012 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " पी एस जे " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण (टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एसईसी " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/224 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 प्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेक्तुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदुर्श तोलन परिणाम उपद‌र्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विर्निर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के ' ई' मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि ग्रा. की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और ' ई' मान 1 × 10% , 2 × 10* अथवा 5 × 10 % , के हैं, जो धनात्मक था ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 110 )/2007] आर. माधुरबूथम , निर्देशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1829 [ भाग -खण्ड (11) )

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19 , 2008/चैत्र 30 , 1930

NewDelhi , the 7th March, 2008

S.O. 851.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of.Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with digital indication of " PSJ " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class- II ) and with brand name " SEC " (herein referred to as the said Model) , manufactured by M/s. ShivaEngineering Corporation, A- 8, Ground Floor, Lal Building, Shivaji Marg, Rourkela- 769012, Orissa and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/224;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Table tap type) with a maximum capacity of30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verification scale interval (e) is 2 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and Model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram, working principle , etc. before or after sale.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument ofsimilar make, and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg. and with number ofverification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg. to 50 mg . and with number of verification scale intervat ' n' in the range of 5000 to 50000 for ' e' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e' value of 1x10 , 2 ×10 or 5× 10%, kbeing the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 110)/2007)

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director ofLegal Metrology 1830

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 19 , 2008 / CHAITRA 30, 1930

[PART II-SFC. 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 7 मार्च , 2008

का. आ. 852. - केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स शिवा इंजीनियरिंग कोपर्पोरेशन, ए-8 , ग्राउंड फ्लोर , लाल बिल्डिंग , शिवाजी मार्ग , राउरकेला-769 012 , उडीसा द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता (यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एसटीटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एसईसी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/225 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्यचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शन प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करना है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टार्टिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबन्द किया जाएगा और मॉडल को विक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री, यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उका अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्मित किया गया है , विनिर्माण उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक को रंज में सत्यापन मापभान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और ' ई ' मान 1×10 , 2× 10 * अथवा 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूणर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 1100 )/2007 ]

आर. माधुरबुथम, निर्देशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [83 ] [ भाग ॥ खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19 , 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

New Delhi , the 7thMarch , 2008

S.O. 852. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "STT" series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class- III ) and with brand name " SEC " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Shiva Engineering Corporation , A- 8 , Ground Floor, Lal Building , Shivaji Marg , Rourkela-769 012, Orissa and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/225;

The saidModel is a strain gauge type. load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 100mg to 2g or with verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 , 2x10 or 5x10 ", k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, desigh and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 110)/2007]

R.MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1832

THE GAZETTE OF INDLA : APRIL 19, 2008/CHAITRA 30, 1930

[PART 11-Sec. 3( )]

नई दिल्ली , 7 मार्च , 2008

का. आ. 853. - केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् याह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता यनाए रखेंगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( ४ ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स शिवा इंजीनियरिंग कोपर्पोरेशन , ए , ग्राउंड फ्लोर , लाल विल्डिंग , शिवाजी मार्ग , राउरकेला-769 012 , उडीसा द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एसपीएफ " श्रृंखला के स्वतःसूचक अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एसईसो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/226 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार संल आधारित अस्त्रचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत्त व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शिल करता है । उपकरण 230 बोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम, निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शतों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदछ शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी शृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. प्रा. से 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और ' ई ' मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 * अथवा 5 × 10 % , के हैं , जो धनात्पक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

{ फा. सें डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 110 ) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1833

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 19, 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 7th March, 2008

S.O. 853. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescriberd authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with theprovisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections ( 7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self indicating non-automatic (Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " SPF " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " SEC" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s. Shiva Engineering Corporation, A-8, Ground Floor , Lal Building, Shivaji Marg, Rourkela- 769 012, Orissa and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07 /226;

The sald Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 150kg. and minimum capacity of 400g . The verification scale interval (e) is 20g. It has a tare device with a100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the welghing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate, sealing shall also be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material, accuracy, design, circult diagram , working principle, etc , before or after sale.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the sald Act, the Cential Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument ofsame series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 5000kg and wich number of verification scale interval (1) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10 , 2x10 or 5 × 10 ' , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (110)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1834

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19 , 2008/ CHAITRA 30, 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 14 मार्च, 2008

का. आ. 854, -केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स व्हेट्रेक, एस-3 /ए , गिरनार पैलेस , बोमीखाल , कटक रोड, भुवनेश्वर-751010 , उडीसा द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " डब्ल्यू टी डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( व्हेंब्रिज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " 'लोबल " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/ 153 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।.

उक्त मॉडल भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50,000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन सापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 10 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयत्तुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

इंडीकेटर की दोनों साइडों में छिद्र करके और इन छिद्रों से लीड वायर बांध कर पार करके इन पर लीड सील से सीलिंग की जाती है । उपकरण को सील तोड़े बिना खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का स्कीमवार डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण में होंगे जो 5 प्रा. अथवा उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5000 कि. प्रा. से ऊपर और 150 रन तक की अधिकत्तम क्षमता वाले हैं और ' ई ' मान 1× 10 , 2× 10% अथवा 5 × 10 , के हैं , जहां पर ' के' धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 215 ) /2006 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप सिज्ञान 1835 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19 , 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

NewDelhi , the 14th March, 2008

S.O. 854. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with. the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976),and the Standards of Weights and Medsures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said. Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing instrument (weighbridge type) with digital indication of " WTW" series of medium accuracy (accuracy: class- III) and with brand name " GLOBAL " (herein referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s. Weightrack, S- 3/A , Girmar Palace, Bomikhal , Cuttack Road, Bhubneshwar- 751010, Orissa and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/ 153 ;

ThesaidModel is a load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of50,000kg, and minimum capacity of200kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 10 kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive: retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

The sealing is provided on the indicator by making a hole each on both sides of the indicator and pasaing a leaded wire fastened to these holes and sealing it with leaded seal . The instrument cannot be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (12 ) of the Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing: instruments of similar make and preformance of same series with maximum capacity between 5000 kg and up to 150. tonne and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and ' e' value of form 1 × 10%, 2× 104 or 5x10 , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materiels with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (215)/2006]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1284G1/2008-4 1836

[PART 11-SEC. 3( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19, 2008 /CHAITRA 30, 1930

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली , 4 अप्रैल , 2008

का. आ. 855.- मारतीथ मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम ? के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारत्तीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे रद्द कर दिए गए हैं:-

अनुसूची

टिप्पणी कम रद्द किये गये मानक ( कों) की संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक

सं

भारत के राजपत्र भाग 2, खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) में का. आ. सं. और तिथि प्रकाशित

(4) (2)

(3)

( 1 )

1. आई एस 3642 1978 शल्य चिकित्सा उपकरणों की सामान्य अपेक्षायें ( प्रथम पुनरीक्षण)

2. आई एस : 10546 1984 चिमटी ( फोर्सेप ) यूटरस होल्डिग डारटीजीस हिस्ट्रोलेय पैटर्न

3. आई एस 12418 ( भाग 2 ) 1987 इन्ट्रा यूटरस गर्भनिरोधक युक्तियां भाग 2 बल ज्ञात करना

4. आई एस : 12418 ( भाग 3 ) 1987 इन्ट्रा यूटरस गर्भनिरोधक युक्तियां भाग 3 पैकिंग एवं लेबलिंग

5. आई एस : 4788 : 1986 छुरी नैत्र, कैपसूलरामी, जिगलर पैटर्न की विशिष्टि

6. आई एस : 4789 : 1986 छुरी , मोतियाबिंद , गेफ , पैटर्न की विशिष्टि

7. आई एस : 5234 1989 नैत्र शल्यक्रिया उपकरण- चिमटी (फोर्सेप ) , मैत्र, अतिरिक्त कैपसूल काठपर्स पैटर्न

8. आई एस : 7860: 1975 मास्क, चेडवार्न रूपान्तरणों सहित शिमेल भ्रॉस पैटर्न की विशिष्टि

9. आई एस : 6513 1985 ऑक्सिजन चिकित्सा के लिए ऑक्सिजन सिलिडरों के साथ प्रयुक्त सुक्ष्म समायोजन वाल्व की विशिष्टि

10. आई एस : 10796 1983 फेफडों के लिये वेंटिलेटरों की विशिष्टि

11. आई एस : 12504 ( भाग 3 ) : 1988 ट्रेकियल ट्यूबों की विशिष्टि

12. आई एस : 12504 ( भाग 5 ) : 1988 कफ और टूयूबों की अपेक्षायें और परिक्षण पद्धतियां

13. आई एस : 10578 1983 शल्यक्रिया हेतु स्प्रिंगं टूसिस

[संदर्भ एम एच डी/जी-3.5 ]

राहुल कुमार , वैज्ञाः ' एफ' एवं प्रभुख ( एम एच डी) 1837

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19 , 2008/चैत्र 30 , 1930

[भाग II खण्ड (ii) ]

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

New Delhi , the 4th April , 2008

S.O. 355.In pursuance of clause (b ) ofsub-rule ( 1 ) of Rule ? of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules; 1987, it is hereby notified that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule given hereafter, ! have been cancelled and stand withdrawn .

SCHEDULE

Remarks SL No. No. nd Year ofthe Indian Standards

S.O. & Date published in the Gazette of India, Part -IL, Section 3, Sub-section(ii)

(4)

(3)

(1)

(2)

1. IS3642:1978 General requirements for surgical instruments ( first revision)

2 IS10546:1984 Forceps , uterus, Holdingdartique hysteroleb

3. IS 12418 (Part 2): 1987 Intra uterine contraceptive device Part 2,Determination of breaking force

4 1S12418 (Part 3): 1987 Intra uterine contraceptive device Part 3 Packing and labelling

5. IS4788: 1986Specification for knife , Eye, Capsulotomy, Ziegler's pattern

6. IS4789:1986Specification for knife, Cataract, Graefe'spattern

7. IS 5234: 1989 Eye surgery Instruments- Forceps, eye, extra-capsule, couper's pattern (modified)

8. I57860: 1975 Specification for masksm Scimmelbushe's pattern with Chadborn's modification

9. 18 6513: 1985 Specification for fine adjustment valves for usewith oxygen cylinders for oxygen therapy

10. IS10796: 1983 Specification for lung ventilators

11. IS12504 (Part 3) : 1988 Specification Tracheal Tubes-part 3: Murphy

12. IS12504 (Part5): 1988 Specification Tracheal Tubes-part 5: Requirements and methods of test for cuffs and tubes

13 IS 10578: 1983 Surgical spring trusses.

[Ref. MHD/G-3.5] -

RAHUL KUMAR, Sc. ' F' & Head (MHD)

नई दिल्ली , 7 अप्रैल , 2008

का.आ. 856.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक( कों) में संशोधन किया गया/ किये गये हैं:-

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू- होने की तिथि क्रम संख्या

संशोधित भारतीय मानक ( कों) की संख्या, वर्ष औरशीर्षक

28-03-2008 1.

1 मार्च , 2008

आई एस 12615: 2004 कर्जा दक्ष प्रेरण मोटरें तीन फेजी स्कियेरल केज (पहला पुनरीक्षण) 1838

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19 , 2008/CHAITRA 30 , 1930

इस संशोधन की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहटी , हैदराबाद, जयपत्रु, कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूषनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

(संदर्भ: इंटी 15/टी -41 ]

पी. के. मुखर्जी, वैज्ञा. ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी )

NewDelhi , the 7th April, 2008

S.O. 856. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub rule ( 1 ) of Rule (7) of Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued:

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the Indian Standards No. and year of the amendment

Sl . No.

Date from which the amendment shall have effeci

28-03-2008

1,March2008

IS 12615 :2004Energy efficent induction motors three phase squirrel cage ( first revision)

Copy ofthis amendment is available with the Bureau of Indian Standards . Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai, Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref. ET 15/T -411

P. K. MUKHERJEE , Sc . ' F' & Head (Electrotechnical )

कोयला मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 9 अप्रैल , 2008

का,आ. 857.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा नियम ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजन के लिए प्रयोग ) , 1976 ( यथा संशोधित, 1987 ) के नियम 10 के उपनियम ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में, कोयला मंत्रालय के अधीन कोल इंडिया लि. के दिल्ली कार्यालय को , जिसके 80 % से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है ।

[सं. ई-12019/1 /99- हिंदी ] कैलाश पति, आर्थिक सलाहकार

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi , the 9th April , 2008

S.O. 857. In pursuance of sub- rule (4) of the Rule 10 ofthe Official Language ( Use for official purposes ofthe Union) Rules , 1976 ( as amended , 1987 ) the Central Government , hereby, notifies the CII . , Kolkata under the Ministry of Coal , whereofmore than 80 % staff have acquired working knowledge ofHindi .

[No. E-12019/ 1 /99-Hindi ] KAILASII PATI , Economic Adviser

नई दिल्ली, 10 अप्रैल , 2008

का.आ. 858.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस क्षेत्र में कोयले के लिए पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दंती है;

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. डी.जी. /8670 तारीख 14 नवम्बर , 2007 का निरीक्षण महाप्रबंधक ( गवेषण प्रभाग ) , सेंट्रल माइन प्लानिंग एण्ड डिजाइन इंस्टीच्यूट, गोंदवाना प्लेस , काँकै रोड, रांची या कोयला नियंत्रक , काउंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट , कोलकातां-700001 के कार्यालय में था जिला कलेक्टर , जिला रायगढ़ , छत्तीसगढ़ के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाली भूमि में हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा (7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, 1830 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19, 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

चाटों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से नब्बे दिन के भीतर महाप्रबंधक ( गवेषणा प्रभाग ) , सेंट्रात माझा प्लानिंग एण्ड डिजाइन इंस्टीच्यूट , गोंदवाना प्लेस , काँके रोड, रांची को भेजेंगे । !

अनुसूची

धिरा नार्थ ईस्ट " बी " ब्लाक , मांद रायगढ़ , कोयला क्षेत्र

जिला-रायगढ़ ( छत्तीसगढ़ )

रेखांक सं. डीजी 8670 तारीख 14 नवम्बर , 2007

ग्राम

टिप्पणिर्या

जिला

सं

ग्राम संख्या

हेक्टेयर में क्षेत्र

तहसील

क्षेत्रफल (एकड़ लगभग)

321600

595.5

भाग चोरी

रायगढ़

241.0

धरमजयगढ़

321700

49.0

20.0

भाग धरमजयगढ़

रायगढ़

3. वनक्षेत्र

282.0

697.0

भाग

रायगढ़

सुरक्षित वन क्षेत्र

1341.5 (लगभग)

543.0 (लगभग)

स्सीमा वर्णनः

क -ख रेखा (लाइन ) बोरो गांव के " क " बिन्दु से आंरभ होती है, और जंगल के बिन्दु " ख " पर मिलती है ।

ख -ग रेखा (लाइन ) , बोरो गांव के जंगल से होकर गुजरती हुई तथा वन के दक्षिणी किनारे के " गं " बिन्दु पर मिलती है । ग-ब

रेखा जंगल के पूर्वी हिस्से से गुज़रती हुई वन के ही दक्षिणी पूर्वी भाग के बिंदु " घ " पर मिलती है ।

घ-क रेखा वन से गुजरती हुई बोये गांव के बिंदु " क " पर वापस मिल जाती है ।

(फा. सं 4301.5/4/2008 -पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]

एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिवर्ष

NewDelhi , the 10th April, 2008

S.O. 858. Whereas it appears to the Central Govemment that Coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the locality mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of séation 4 of the Coal Bearing Areai (Acquisitions and Developinent) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Government herebygiven notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein ;

The plan number DG/8670 dated the 14thNovember, 2007 ofthe area covered by this notification can be inspected at the office ofGeneral Manager (Exploration Division ), Central Mine Planning and Design Institute , GondwanaPlace, KankeRoad , Ranchi or at the office ofthe Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street, Calcutta or at the office ofthe District Collector, District Raigarh , Chattisgarh .

All persons interested in the land covered by this notification shall deliver all maps, charts and other documents referred in sub -section (7) of section 13 of the said Act to the General Manager (Exploration Division) , Central Mine Planning andDesign Institute, Gondwana Place , Kanke Road, Ranchi within ninety days from the date ofpublication of this notification in the Official Gazette.

SCHEDULE

Chira NORTH East-B Block, Mand Raigarh Coalfield, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

Planbearingmomber DG/8670 dated the 14th November2007

District

Remarks Village

Thana/ Tehsil

Village No.

SI . No.

Area in (Acres) (Approx)

Area in (Hectares) (Approx)

241.0

321600

595.5

Boro

Raigarh

321700

DharamjaiGarh Dharamjai Garh

Jabga

49.0 697.0

20.0 282.0

R.Forest

Part Part Part

Raigarti Raigarh

Total

1341.5

543.0

(Approximat-

(Approxi- mately) ely) 1840

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19, 2008/CHAITRA 30 , 1930

[PART I-Sec. 3(ii )] BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION

A-B:- The line start at point ' A' in village Boro and meets point 'B ' in forest.

B-C The line passes through Forest village Bora and meets point ' c ' in the southern part ofthe forest.

C-D:- The line passes through eastern side of the forest and meets point ' D ' in the south- eastern part of the forest, D-A:- The line passes through forest and meets point ' A' in village Boro .

[FileNo. 43015/04/2008- PRIW -I ] M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 10 अप्रैल , 2008

का.आ. 859.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चातउक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई । भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्यांक का.आ. 4412 तारीख 13 नवम्बर , 2006 जो भारत के राजपत्र , भाग 11 , खंड 3 उपखंड ( ii ) , तारीख 18 नवम्बर, 2006 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि और अधिकारों का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दीथी;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का पूर्वोक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और मध्य प्रदेश सरकार से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि इससे संलग्नं अनुसूची में यथावर्णित 175.118 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 432.72 एकड़ (लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि अर्जित की जानी चाहिए। अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदच शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घेषणा करती है कि इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में यथावर्णित 175.118 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 432.72 एकड़ ( लगभग ) भाप वाली भूमि अर्जित किया जाता है । इस अधिसूचना के अधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेंखाक संख्यांक एसईसीएल/चीएसपी /जीएम /पीएलजी/ भूमि 314 तारीख 14-09-2007 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर, कोरवा ( छत्तीसगढ़) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कलकत्ता के कार्यालय में या साउथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व अनुभाग ) , सीपत रोड, बिलासपुर 495006 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है । ;

अनुसूची

अमरपुर दक्षिण विस्तार ब्लाक , कोरवा क्षेत्र

जिला कोरबा ( छत्तीसगढ़ )

खनन अधिकार

पटवारी

जिला

टिप्पण

तहसील

क्षेत्र हेक्टर में

संख्या

ग्राम का नाम

क्र. सं

हल्का नंबर

कटघोरा

कोरबा

87.677

1. जवाली

59.542

भाग

कटघोरा

कोरबा

सिपाली 33

कोरबा

भाग

कटघोरा

27.899

अभयपुर 33

योग: - 175.118 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 432.72 एकड़ ( लगभग )

( 1 ) ग्राम जवाली ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या-

11 से 13 , 10 से 129, 133 , 189, 190( भाग ) 191 , 192( भाग ) 193 ( भाग )

(2 ) ग्राम सिंभाली ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या-

1 से 7 , 8/1 ( भाग ) , 270 ( भाग ) , 307 , 310 से 313 , 315 से 323, 325 से 329, 330 (भाग)

(3) ग्राम अभयपुर ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या-

180( भाग ) , 226( भाग ) , 227 ( भाग ) , 228 ( भाग ) , 229, 230(भाग ) , 231 , 233( माग ) , 237( भाग ) , 238( भाग ) , 240( भाग ) , 241 ( भाग ) , 242 से 284

सीमा वर्णनः

क-ख रेखा ग्राम जवाली और बिजयपुर की संयुक्त सीमा पर बिन्दु " क " से आरम्भ होती है और उसी संयुक्त सीमा से गुजरती हुई बिंदु 'ख' पर मिलती है ।

ख-ग रेखा ग्राम जवाली और अभयपुर की भागतः संयुक्त सीमा से होती हुई ग्राम अभयपुर में प्रवेश करती है और प्लाट सं. 180 , 238 , 240 , 241 , 237 , 233 , 230 , 228 , 227 , 226 से गुजरती हुई ग्राम सिंघाली में प्रवेश करती है और प्लाट सं. 8/1 , 270 से गुजरती हुई ' ग ' बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

रेखा ग्राम सिंघाली के प्लाट संख्या 270 , 307 , 311 , 310, 313 , 316, 322 , 323 की दक्षिणी सीमा , बाद में प्लाट सं. 330 से गुजरती हुई ग्राम सिंथाली एवं जवाली की संयुक्त सीमा के ' घ' पर मिलती है ।

घ-क रेखा ग्राम जवाली के प्लाट संख्यांक 192 , 193 , 190 से होकर बाद में प्लाट सं. 116 , 129 , 116 , 133 , 125 , 104 , 12 , 13 , ।। की पश्चिमी सीमा से गुजरती हुई आंरभिक बिंदु ' क ' पर मिलती है ।

[संख्या 43015/3/2005- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू]

एम. शहाबुद्दीन, अवर सचिव 1841

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 19, 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

[भाग -सड 3(ii) ]

NewDelhi , the 10th April,2008

S.O. 859-Whereas by the notification ofGovemment of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O.4412 dated the 13thNovember 2006, under sub-section (i) ofSection 7 of the Coal Bearing Arcas (Acquisition and Development ) Act. 1957 (20 of1957) (bereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in the Gazette of India part II, Section 3, sub-section (ii) dated the 18th November 2006 , the Central Govemment gave notice of its intention to acquire land and rights in the localityspecified in the Schedule appended to that notification;

Andwhereas , the competent authority, in pursuance ofSection 8 ofthe said Act has made his report tothe Central Government;

Andwhereas, the Central Government after considering the aforesaid report and after re- consulting the Government ofChhattisgarh is satisfied that the lands measuring the 175.118 hectares (approximately) or 432.72 acres (approximately) described in the Schedule appended hereto, should be acquired;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (i) of Section 9 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the rights in the lands measuring 175.118 hectares (approximately) or 432.72 acres (approximately) as described in the said Schedule are herebyacquired.

The plan bearing number SECUBSP/GM/ ( PLG )/ LAND/314 dated 14th September , 2007 of the areas covered bythis notificationmaybe inspected in the Office ofthe Collector, Korba, (Chhattisgarh) or in the Office ofthe Coal Controller , I Council House Street, Kolkata or in the Office of the South Eastern Coalfield Limited (Revenue Section) Seepat Read. Bilaspur-495006(Chhattisgarh),

SCHEDULE

Amarpur South ExtensionBlock

KorbaArea

District Korba(Chattisgarh)

MiningRights

Tehsil

Remarks

District

Khewat No.

Patwarl halkaNo.

Area in (Hectares)

No.

Name of Villingt

Jawali

Part 1.

Korba

87.677

Katghora

Korba

59.542

Part

Katghora

Singhali

Korba

27.899

Part 3.

Katghora

Abhaipur

Total :-175.118Hectares (Approximately) or 432.72Acres. (Approximately)

(1) Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Jawali (Part) :-

11 to 13 , 104 to 129,133,189,190 (part), 191,192 (part ). 193 (part).

(2) Plotnumbers to be acquired in Village Singhali (Part ) :- 1 to7,8/1 (part),270 (part ) , 307, 310 to313, 315 to 323,325 to329, 330 (part) ,

( 3) PlotNumbers to be acquired in Village Abhaipur (part):-

180 (part),226 (part), 227(part ), 228 (part ) , 229,230 ( part), 231, 233 (part ), 237 (part ), 238 (part ), 240 (part),241 (part), 242 to284,

Boundary Description:

A-B: Line Starts from point " A" on the common boundary of Villages Jawali & Village Bijaipur and passes along the same common boundary and meets at point "B".

B-C: Line passes along the partly common boundary of Village Jawali & Village Abhaipur, then enters in Village Abbaipur and passes through plot numbers 180, 238, 240, 241 , 237, 233, 230, 228 , 227 , 226 then enters in Village Singhli and passes through plot numbera 8/ 1,270 and meets at point "C".

CD: Linepasses along the southern boundary ofplot numbers 270, 307, 311 , 310, 313 , 316, 322 , 323 ofVillage Singhali, then through plot number 330 and meets point "D " at the common boundary of Village Jawali & Singhali D-A: Line passes through plot numbers 192, 193 , 190 ofVillage Jawali then along western boundary ofplot sumbers 116, 129, 133 , 125, 104, 12, 13 , 1 land meets at the starting point "A".

[No.43015/3/2005-PRIW] M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Sacy.

1842

(PART II-SBC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19, 2008/CHAITRA 30, 1930

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 16 अप्रैल, 2008

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

का.आ. 860. केन्द्रीय सरकार कोलोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में मांगल्या ( इन्दौर ) संस्थापन से हरियाणा राज्य में पियाला तथा दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र में बिजवासन तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक विस्तार पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाचद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public , object in writingto the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying ofthe pipeline under the land to Shrimati Bhagwanti Jathwani , Competent Authority, Mumbai -Mánglya Pipeline Extension Project , Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited , B-105 , Indra Vihar, Talwandi , Kota-324005 (Rajasthan ) .

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

State : Rajasthan

Tehsil : Indargarh District : Bundi

SI. Nameofthe

Arca in Hectare

Survey No.

No Village

0.0344

180

Laban

[F. No. R-31015/85/2004-OR- 111 A. GOSWAMY , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 16 अप्रैल , 2008

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीत्तर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन चिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में , श्रीपति भगवंती जेठवानी , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुम्बई मांगल्या पाइपलाइन विस्तार परियोजना , भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड. बी 105 , इन्द्र विहार तलवंडी, कोटा-324005 ( राजस्थान ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : बूंदी

तहसील : इन्द्रगढ़

क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में

क्र. सं. ग्राम का नाम सर्वे नंबर

का,आ. 861.- भारत सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि राजस्थान राज्य में मनसारामपुरा - बी.पी.सी.एल. पाइपलाइन परियोजना अंतर्गत गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड के मनसारामपुरा स्टेशन से बी.पी.सी.एल. बोटलिंग प्लांट तक गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा एलपीजी गैस के परिवहन के लिए एक एलपीजी पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

180

0.0344

1 .

लबान

[फा. सं. आर-31015/85/2004- ओआर- I[ ]

ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव

और भारत सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह औवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi , the 16th April , 2008

अतः अब, भाारत सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

S. O. 860. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that forthe transportation of petroleum products from Manglya (Indore) terminal in the State of Madhya Pradesh , an extension popeline to Piyala in the State of Haryana and Bijwasan in the NCT of Delhi should be laid by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना 1841 [भाग -खण्ड 3 (ii ) 1

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19, 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferredby sub-section (1 ) ofsection 3 ofthe Petroleum and Mineralk Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquine the right ofuser therein;

की प्रतियों साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में, श्री एस. सी. जैन , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , चतुर्थ तल , क्रिस्टल मॉल, ए-३ , सवाई जय सिंह राजमार्ग, बनीपार्क, जयपुर-302016 ( राजस्थान ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला तहसील गाँव

सर्वे नं. आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल (हैक्टेयर में)

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the notification issued under sub- section( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as publisdied in the Gazette of India are made available to the general publie , object in writing to the laying ofthe pipeline under the land to Shri S. C. Jain Competent Authority, 4th Floor, Crystal Mall, A-3, Saiwal Jai Singh Highway, Banipark, Jaipur- 302016 (Rajasthan).

: 2

SCHEDULE

0.0228

जयपुर जयपुर मनसारामपुरा 73

Village

District Tehsil

Survey

0.0178

76/382

01270

Area to ba acquired forROU(in Hectare)

01676

योग

0.0450

347

बावड़ी

Mansaram-

Jaipur

0.02285

pura

0.0030

346

0.0178 345

0.0120

76/382

0.1270

0.0300

344

0.1676

Total

340

0,0450

0.0050

347

Bawadi

0.0030

346

0.0450

342

345

0.0120 296

0.0200

344

0.0300

0.0550

0.0050 336

340

0.0450

342

-0.0640

314

296

0.0200

0.0740

311

0.0550

336

0.0770

310

0.0640

314

0.0740

311

0.4300

योग

0.0770

310

[फा. सं. एल -14014/4/07 - जी.पी. ]

0.4300

Total

के. के. शर्मा , अवर सचिव

[F. No. L -14014/4/07-GP.J New Delhi , the 16th April , 2008.

K. K. SHARMA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 16 अप्रैल , 2008

8.0. 861. Whereas it appears to Government of India that it is necessary in the public interest that for transportation of LPG from GAIL's IP Station at Mansarampura to BPCL Bottling Plant at Jaipur through Mansarampura -BPCLpipeline project in State ofRajasthan , a LPG pipeline should be laid by GAIL (India) Limited;

Andwhereas it apears to Government of India that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

का.आ. 862.-भारत सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 2785 तारीख 19 सितम्बर, 2007 द्वारा, उस अधिसूचन से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेखं द्वारा महाराष्ट्र राज्य में कारगौव पुने पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम 1284G1/2008-5 1844

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19, 2008/ CHAITRA 30, 1930

से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाईन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्रित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 28-01-2008 से 30-01-2008 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थीं;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

और पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में जनता से कोई आक्षेप प्राप्त नहीं हुए;

और भारत सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है;

अतः अब, भारत सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाना है;

और , भारत सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 4 ) द्वार प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , निर्देश देती है किपाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार , इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तरीख को , भारत सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए , पाइपलाइनें बिछाने का प्रस्ताव करने वाली गेल ( इण्डिया) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा और तदुपरि, भूमि में ऐसे उपयोग का अधिकार , इस प्रकार अधिरोपित निबंधनों और शतों के अधीन रहते हुए, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

सहसील ग्राम

सर्वे नं.

जिला

आर. ओ.यू. हेतु अवाप्त योग्य रकवा ( डॅक्टर्स में)

153

0.0030 बाड़ी बटेश्वरकला

धौलपुरी

100

0.0300

0.0440

101

0.0040

152

0.0060

151

194

0.0100

195

0.0580

0.0270

112

107

0.0030

0.0250

106

105

0.0330

183/296 0.3590

183/297 0.0250

[PART 1 SBC. 3( ii )]

5 1 2

183/366 0.1080

0.7350

योग

0.0075

कुहावनी

0.0075

0.0400

501

0.0050

योग 0.0600

583

गढ़ी खिराना

0.0150

0.0300

598

0.0150

599

603

0.1050

0.0100

602

0.0132

1018

597

0.0108

0.1990

योग

0.1892 रानपुर

0.0540

02432

170 178 योग

0.0450

596

अलीगढ़

0.0600

883

0.0100

884

0.0900

890

0.0200

891

0.0300

880

0.0398

878

876

0.0370

0.0398

874

0.3616

योग

0.0100 जरारी घेसुआ

0.1210

00100

1040 1032 1031

0.1410 लखखेपुरा

0.0500 0.0278 0.0676

द्योग 70 67 65

0.1454 पुरा उलावटी

0.0162 0.0162

योग 467 योग

0.0248

अनुपूरा

0.0230

0.0450

0.0100

144

0.0125

145

0,0225

146

0.1378

योग

0.0648 कुरी का पूरा 1628/4020

योग 0.0648 1845

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19 , 2008 /चैत्र 30 , 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (li) ]

New Delhi , the 16th April, 2008

2301

0.0418

अफजलपुर

0.0100

2296.

2295

0.0200

0.0486

2245

2240

0.0020

0.00100

2237

0.0204

2238

2230

0:0400

0.0200

2213

0.0082

2206

S.O. 862. Whereas by notification ofGovernment of India in Ministry ofPertoleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 2785 dated 19th Sepetmber , 2007 issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Popelines (Acquisition of Right of Users in Land) Act, 1962(50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), Government of India declared its intention to acquire the right ofuser in the land specified in the Schedulle appended. to that notification for the purpose of laying pilpeline for transport of natural gas through Ibrahimpur -Dholpur pipeline project in the State of Rajasthan by GAL (India) Limited;

0.2210

योग

2215 0.1890

ध्वजपुरा

Andwhereas copies ofthe said Gazette notification were made avaliable to the public from 28-01-2008 to 30-01-2008;

2216

0.0810

0.2700

बोग

And whereas the Competent Authority has, under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted its report toGovernment of India;

0.0140

मरहोली

0.0080

Andwhereas no objections were received from the public to the laying of the pipeline;

0.0478

0.0532

0.0060

Andwhereas Government of India has , after con- sidering the said report , decided to acquire the Right of User in the lands specified in the Schedule;

0.0770

0.0760

0.2820

योग

0.0130

अंतर

Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred bysub-section( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, Government of India bereby declares that the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

400

0.0146

399

0.0276

योग

0.3348

301

धौलपुर पूठपुरा

0.3348

योग

1345 0.1188

सरानी

And, further, in exercise of the povers conferredby sub-section (4) ofSection 6 ofthe said Act , Government of India hereby directs that the Right ofUser in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in Government of India, vest, on this date of the publigation ofthe declaration, in the GAIL (India) Limited, free from aال encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

0.1188

योग

0.0100

405

भिलगांवा

District Tehsil Village Survey No. BlockNo.

0.0100

घोग

0.0700

528

बसई सामंता

Land to be acquired for R.O.Lt in Hectares

0.0584

531

0.0300

573

0.0030

0.0980

584

Dholpur Badi Bateshwarkala 153

0.0040

152

606

0.1584

0.0300

100

605

0.0450

101

0.0440

0.0160

604

0.0060

151

566/2

0.0702

0.0100

194

195

0.5460

योग

0.0180

0.0278

112

248

0:0100

107

0.0000 सुरजपुरा

247

0.0208

0.0150

106

0.000

105

0.0040

312

0.3190

183/296

0.0100

316

0.0250

183/297

0.0448

योग

0.1080

183/366 [फाईल सं. एल-14014/9/07-जी.पी. ]

Total

0.7350

के. के. शर्मा, अवर सचिव

1846

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19 , 2008/CHAITRA 30, 1930

5 2

0.0075

Kuhawni

0.0075

0.0400

0.0050

501

Total

0.0600

583

0.0150 Gadi Khirana

0.0300

598

599

0.0150

603

0.1050

602

0.0100

0.0132

1018

0.0108

597

0.1990

Total

0.1892

170

Ranpur

178

0.0540

0.2432

Total

0.0350

596

Aligarh

0.0600

883

0.0100

884

0,0900

890

0.0200

891

880

0.0300

878

0.0398

0.0370

876

0.0398

874

0.3616

Total

0.0100

1040

Zarari Ghesua

0.1210

1032

0.0100

1031

0.1410

Total

0.0500 Lakhepura

0.0278

0.0676

Total

0.1454

467

0.0162 Pura Ulawati

0.0162

Total

0.0248

Bakhtupura

0.0230

0.0450

144

0.0100

145

0.0125

146

0.0225

0.1378

Total

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

5 2

0.0648

1628/4020

Kuri ka Pura

0.0648

Total

0.0418

2301

Afjalpur

2296

00100

2295

0.0200

0.0486

2245

0.0020

2240

2237

0.0100

0.0204

2238

0.0400

2230

0.0200

2213

2206

0.0082

Total

0.2210

0.1890

2215

Dhwazpura

0.0810

2216

0.2700

Total

0.0140 Marholi

0,0080

0.0478

0.0532

0.0060

0.0770

0.0760

0.2820

Total

400

0.0130 Arrua

0.0146

399

0.0276

Total

03348

301

Dholpur Puthpura

0.3348

Total

0.1188

1345

Srani

Total / 0.1188

0.0100

405

Bhilganwa

0.0100

Total

0.0700

528

Basai Samantha

0.0584

531

0.0300

573

0.0980

584

0.1584

606

0.0450

605

0.0160

604

0.0702

566/2

0.5460

Total

248

00100 Surajpura

0.0208

247

0.0040

312

316

0.0100

0.0448

Total

[F. No. L- 14014/9/07-G.P ]

K. K. SHARMA, Under Secy.

1847 [ भाग - खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19, 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

State: Jharkhand

Idustry: Coal

Dated:Dhanbad , the 10th March, 2008 श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 19 मार्च, 2008

AWARD

The Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment in exercise ofthe powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the 1.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their OrderNo. L- 20012/ 123/95 dated, the 4th April , 1996.

SCHEDULE

का. आ. 863.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17. के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, ( सं. II ) धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 58/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-03-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/123/95- आई आर ( सी- [ ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्कअधिकारी

"Whether the management of Block-II Area of M/ s . BCCL is justified in denying employinent to the dependent of Shri Hussaini, ex-Beldar? Ifnot, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled?" MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 19th March , 2008

5.0.863.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 58/ 96) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court ( No. 2) , Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s , BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19-3-2008 .

[No. L-20012/ 123/95 - IR (C- T) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk, Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2 AT DHANBAD

PRESENT:

Shri Nagendra Kumar. , Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10( 1) ( d) of the I. D. Act , 1947

Reference No. 58 of 1996

Parties

2. The case of the concerned workman Hussain! Beldar as disclosed in the Written Statement is that he worked for long in Block- II Area. Due to long working the concerned workman suffered from several diseases. as a result of which he became unfit to continue in the employment . The management got the concerned workman medically examined that whether he was medicallyunfit or otherwise to continue in employment. After medical examination the concerned workman was foundmedically unfit for continuance in employment and this fact was communicated to the concerned workman vide office order bearing No. CGM/B - I/PD/ 320/91 dated 15-2-91 /19-2-91 . and his services were terminated with imunediate effect. After termination of service the concerned workman submitted all required documents to the management within time for employment of his dependent in accordance with the provision of clause 9.4.3 of NCWA. In spite of submission of all required, valid and genuine document the management avoided to give employment to the dependent of the concerned workman , In para -7 the concerned workman has stated about the record notesof discussion and minute of the meeting of the Central Consultative Committee of the BCCL held on 22-11-92 regarding providing employment to the dependent of medically unfit cases. In this circumstances the dependent of the concerned workman is legally entitled for employment with other relief/relieves . Prayer has been made to pass Award directing the management to provide employment to the dependent of the ex-conceглеб workman.

Employers in relation to the management of Block II Area of M/ s. BCCL and their workman .

Appearances:

Mr. B.N. Singh ,

On behalf of the workman

Representative of the workman

Mr. H. Nath, Advocate

Onbehalf of the employers

3. On the other hand the management has filed W.S. -cum-rejoinder stating therein that this reference is not legally maintainable. The concerned workman Hussaini Beldar declared his age as 42 years on 17-10-71 and the same has been recorded in the Form B Register of the Company maintained under Section 48 of the Mines Act . Accordingto the certified Standing Order applicable to the establishment he was to be 1848

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19 , 2008/CHAITRA 30 , 1930 [PART II--SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

the rejoinder and clarifying the stand of the concerned workman it has been stated that his dependent son is entitled for employment.

6. POINTS TO BE DECIDED :

"Whether the management of Block- II Area of M/ s . BCCL is justified in denying employment to the dependent of Shri Hussaini, ex-Beldar? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled?"*

7. FINDING WITH REASONS :

It may be mentioned that vide order dated 1-6-2004 Sarjan Beldar son of ex - workman Hussaini Beldar was substituted.

superannuated after completion of 60 years of age on 17-10-89. The concerned workman managed to get 71- altered as 73 in the year 1987 at the time of issuance of service excerpts . In his service excerpt clerical mistake was thade and the dealing clerk put figure " 42" years as on 17-10-73 instead of 17-10-71. The concerned workman was sent to the Medical Board for examination of his physical fitness in the year 1991. The Medical Board declared him unfit for his employment . His services were terminated w.e.f. 12-2-91 as he was found medically nofit to perform the original job . As the figure was altered he would have retired in normal course on 17-10-91 whereas his services were terminated 8 months prior to the alleged date of his retirement . The management did not take any action against the concerned workman for manipulation made at the time of issuance of service excerpts to him and all the dues including the gratuity was paid considering his termination w.e.f. 12-2-91 on medical ground. It has also been stated that the clause of NCWA for providing employment to the dependentcould only be constituted on the ground of compassionate ground and not as a matter of right . The demand of the sponsoring union for employment to the dependent of the concerned workman is illegal, unconstitutional , void and unjustified and no relief can be granted for employment to the dependent of Hussaini Beldar.

In support of his claim the dependent of the concerned workman has examined himself as WW- I oп his behalf. The document regarding declaration of medical unfitness is Ext . W- 1 . A copy of Service excerpt of Hussaini Beldar is marked as Ext , W- 2 . The management in order to substantiate its claim has examined MW- 1 K.N. Jha and MW-2 S.P. Dubey. On behalf of the management a letter by which industrial dispute was raised is marked as Ext. M- 1 . The letter of Personnel Manager is marked as Ext . M-2 . The FormB Register has been marked as material Ext 1. The entry regarding Hussaini Beldar at page 282 is marked as Ext . M-3 and entry regarding date of appointment is marked as Ext. M-3 / 1 . The photo copy of the L.P.C. is marked as Ext. M-4 (with objection) .

+. In the rejoinder portion the contents about paras 2.3.4 and 5 of the W.S. of the concerned workman are stated to be not fully correct. The concerned workman served even after crossing the actual age of superannuation with the assistance of dealing clerk by getting the facts entered in his service excerpt altered 71 as 73. As he had already crossed 60 years his continuance in employrment was not justified. The correct fact of manipulation was only detected after his termination of his service when he applied for employment of his dependent . About paras 6 and 7 it has further been said that the same are not fully correct . About paras 5 and 8 of the W.S. of the concerned workman it has been stated that the same are the matters of record. The contents of rest of the paras of W.S. of the workman are incorrect and denied . Prayer has been made to pass Award that the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief.

8. WW- 1 bas stated that his father Hussaini Beldar was a Tyndal and posted at Regional Store Area II. In the year 1991 management declared his father as medically unfit and stopped him from service . His father was in service since 1973 , After stopping the service of his father being advised by the management he applied for employment on compassionate ground as the eldest and dependent son ofhis father. He submitted application along with requisite papers . Along with his father the management stopped service of another workman viz , Agress Kamath on medical ground and provided employment to his son on compassionate ground. In support of the claim the concerned workman has filed office order marked as Ext . W- 1 to show that Hussaini Beldar and Agress Kamath were terminated from the service as they were declared medically unfin. Ext. W-2 has been fited to show that the age ofHussaini Beldar was 42 years as on 17-10-73 and he was appointed on 6-7-64. During cross-examination the witness has said that he cannot say what date of birth of his father was recorded in the Form B Register. He has denied that his claim is not justified and he is not entitled for the reliefs.

9. Ld . Lawyer for the concerned workman has vehemently argued that as per provision of clause 9.4.3 of NCWA a person who is declared medically unfit and terminated from the service his dependent is provided 5. A rejoinder has also been filed by the concerned workman stating that the contents of paras 3 and 4 are denied as the same are devoid of truth in the case of the concerned workman . The statement made in paras 6, 8, 9 have been denied. The contents of para li to the extent that the concerned workman worked after crossing the actual age of superannuation with the assistance of deating clerk by putting facts entered in his service excerpt from 71 to 73 are denied being concocted . mischievous and devoid of reasons. About paras 12, 13 it is said that the same are irrelevant . Giving further explanation in 1849 [ भाग [[-खंड (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 19, 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

concerned workman worked extra for about 2 year's . From his further evidence it appears that due to his reason the prayer for appointment of the dependent was not considered. During cross- examination lie has said that he does not know if Benedhi Colliery handed over copy of L. P. C. to the concerned workman. On receipt of service excerpt the concerned workman raised objection about his wrong recording of date ofbirth and requested the management to send him to Apex Medical Board for assessment ofhis age but the prayer was not considered. When the concerned workman submitted application for medical examination declaring him unfit the management consulted Form B Register which was lying at Benedih Colliery and at that time they came to know that in the service excerpt wrong age was recorded due to clerical mistake.

employment in his place . The concerned ex -workman was in service during which he was declared medically unfit and he was terminated from the job . When his dependent applied for employment furnishing all the requisite papers he was not provided employment whereas inthe similar circumstances another workman viz . Agress Kamath was declared medically unfit and he was terminated from the job and his dependent has been provided employment. He has further submitted that the stand of the management that the concerned workman has served after crossing the date of age ofsuperannuation iswrongwhich is evident from Ext. W- 2 where it has been mentioned 42 years as on 17-10-73 and in the light of the calculation of date of superannuation considering the date of birth as 17-10-73 the concerned workman was very well in service on the date whenhe was terminsted.

10. On the other hand . Ld. Lawyer for the management has vehemently argued that the concerned ex-workman Hussaini Beldar had served more than the actual date ofsuperannuation due to the mistake recorded in the service excerpt . The age "42" years has been recordedas on 17-10-71 in the Statutory Forra B Register ofBenedih Colliery. This fact was noticed when the dependent of the concerned workman had applied for employment on the ground that his father has been terminated from service on the ground of medical unfitness. In fact due to this reason he ought to have retired in the year 1989 but he served the company for more than actual superannuation age due to clerical mistake in some documents like service excerpts . In this circumstances the concerned workman is not entitled for any relief. It has also been submitted that the concerned ex-workman did not disclose the actual date of birth as recorded in Form B Register while he was being examined bythe ApexMedical Board,

12. From the evidence of the aforesaid witness it appears that the concerned ex-workman viz. Hussaini Beldar continued his service extra for about 2 years than the actual date of superannuation due to the mistake in service excerpt. However , this fact was noticed when Hussaini Beldar was sent for medical examination for which he had made prayer. In this context the witness has also referred the age of Hussaini Beldar "42" years as on 17-10-71 as mentioned in the Form B Registeras well as in the L. P. C. From perusal of L. P. C. which is dated 23-7-85 it appears that the age ofHussaini Beldar has been mentioned as 42 years as on 17-10-71 . From perusal of Ext . M- 2 it appears that a reply has been submitted to the ALC ( C) Dhanbad during the conciliation proceeding that the age of the concerned personwas recorded as 42 years on 17-10-71 in the Form BRegister and as per record normal date of retirement was 17-10-89 but due to mistake it was recorded as 42 years as on 17-10-73 . Hence the concerned ex -workınan who was to be superannuated on 17-10-89 continued in employment beyond 60 years . The wrong date of birth was filled up at the time of medical examination which could not be detected and hence the person concerned was examined by the Medical Board. When this fact was noticedby the managemem the matter was examined and the employment ofthe dependent ofHussaini Beldar could not be given. In the aforesaid context, from perusal of evidence ofMW- 2 it appears that a Form.B Register is Toaintained from the date of nationalisation of the colliery and the age as 42 years was recorded as on 17-10-71 of the concerned ex -workman.

This has beenrecorded at page 282 of the matterial exhibit-1 . He has also said about the entries of the date ofbirth ofHussaini Beldar which is Ext . M-3/ 1 . The witness has also said about the receipt of L.P.C. when the concerned person Hussaini Beldar was transferred-to the colliery ofBlock II. This is Ext, M-4, During cross- examination the witness has said that the Form B Register.

11. MW- 1 has stated that he is Personnel Manager posted in Block II Area . He knows the concerned workman who was a Tyndal at Block II Area. The concerned ex-workman joined Block II Area on transfer fromBenedih Colliery. They received the L. P. C. ofthe concerned ex - workman from Benedih Colliery managemem in which his age was recorded as 42 years on 17-10-71 , The Form B Register ofBenedih Colliery also disclosed the same age of the concerned workman, However, in the service excerpt of the concerned workman his age was recorded as 42 years as on 17-10-73 due to clerical mistake . The concerned workinan made prayer for declaration regarding medical unfitness and he was sent to the Apex Medical Board and he was declared medically unfit by the Medical Boerd dt. 12-2-91 and accordingly he was terminated from service w.e.f. 12-2-91. As per date of birth recorded in the Form B Register the due date of superannuation wouldbe 17-10-89 but due to mistake of the management the 1850

PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19, 2008/ CHAITRA 30. 1930

belongs to Bencdih colliery. The register is from 1971 . In cross - examination the witness has said regarding the date of medical unfitness of Hussaini Beldar and agrees Kamath whose dependent has been employed.

more than the actual date of superannuation and then he was declared medically unfit , it does not appear in accordance with law to pass an Award as prayed for by the concerned workman In the result the following Award isrendered :

"The management of Block - II Area of M/ s ; BC'CL is justified in denying employment to the dependent of Shri Hussaini . ex - Beldar . Consequently, the dependent ofHussaini Beldar is not entitled to get any relief."

NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 19 मार्च , 2008 13. While going through the material exhibit- 1 M-3 and M-3 / 1 it appears that the age of Hussaini Beldar has been mentioned as 42 years as on 17-10-71 . This entry has been made in the statutory Form B Register. On behalf of the concerned ex-workman this statutory Form B Register has not been disputed. From Ex . M-2 details of which have already been mentioned, it further appears that the date of birth of the concerned workman hasbeen recorded as 42 years . "42 years as on 17-10-71 recorded in the statutory Form B Register could not be noticed earlier Even Ext, M -4 is on the record. Though objection has been raised no specific reason has been told as to why this should not be considered. This is a copy of L.P.C. which has been issued on 22-7-85 when the concerned ex - workman was transferred. In this document also his age has been mentioned as 42 years as on 17-10-71.

का. आ. 864.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैं. बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण ( सं. II ) , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 129/1999) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-03-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/180/98- आई आर ( सो [ ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 19th March 2008

5.0. 864. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 129/ 1999) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (No. 2 ) , Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 19-3-2008

[No. L-20012/ 180 /98-1R ( C - 1 ) SNEH LATA JAWAS . Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2 AT DHANBAD PRESENT :

Shri Nagendra Kumar, Presiding Officer

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the 1. D. Act , 1947

Reference No. 129 of 1999

Parties

: Employers in relation to the management of M/ s . BCCL and their workman 14. In fact as per submission made on behalf of the concerned workman much reliance has been placed that his age is 42 years as on 17-10-73 as nientioned in service excerpt. The evidence and materials furnished by the management shows that it has been mentioned due to clerical mistake i.c. 17-10-73 has been mentioned instead of 17-10-71 . The service excerpt is marked as Ext . W-2. From perusal of the same it appears that on the back portion of this document Hussaini Beldar, the concerned ex - workman has mentioned that his age has wronglybeen recorded in all the documents . From perusal of the same it appears that 42 years on 17-10-73 has been mentioned relating to Hussaini Beldar . As mentioned carlier the management has explained that this was due to the clerical mistake . It will be relevant to mention that service excerpt is issued on the basis of the entries made in the statutory Form B Register as well as other records . On consideration of the facts that the Statutory Form B Register shows the age of Hussaini Beldar as 42 years as on 17-10-71 the concerned ex - workman ought to have retired on 17-10-89 but it appears that, he continued in service more than the actual date of superannuation due to wrong entries in service excerpt . Thereafter he was declared medically unfit and thereafter he was terminated from the job. In fact no much dispute has been raised on behalf of the management regarding provision of employment to the dependent who is declared medically unfit. Even from the evidence ofMW- 2it appears that in such circumstances the dependent of another person viz .. Agress Kamath was provided employment by the management ,

Appearances :

On behalf of the workman

: Mr. J. Pandey, Advocate

15. However, in the peculiar facts and Circumstances of the case when the concerned ex -workman Hussaini Beldar continued in service [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]

1851.

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19 , 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

Onbehalf of the

Mr. D.K. Verma , Advocate

employers

directing the managemem to provide employment to Smt. Nageshwari Devi wife of deceased Nagendra Singh State : Jharkhand

Industry: Coal

Dated: Dhanbad, the 4th March , 2008.

AWARD

TheGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the 1.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute 10 this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/ 180/ 98 IR( C- I), dated the 27th January, 1999.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Sendra Bansjora Colliery of M/ s. BCCL in not providing employment to the widow, Smt. Nageshwari Devi , W/o Late Nagendra Singh , Peon who was murdered while in service in the Colliery premises is justified?. Ifnot, to what relief is Smt. Nageshwari Devi w/ o LateNagendra Singh entitled?"

3. The management in the W.S. -cum -rejoinder has stated that Late Nagendra Singh, Ex-Peon of Sendra Bansjora Colliery started absconding from 1-2-1979 and started absenting from duty w.e.f. 2-2-1979 without any information and permission from the Compétent Authority. His name was removed from the rali of the company. Thereafter in the year 1991 the alleged wife of Late Nagendra Singh applied for employment on compassionate ground that her husband died on 11-3-83 as he was murdered . Such application for employment hasbeen made after 8 years without assigning any reason for such delay. At the time of death of Late Nagendra Singh he was not in the roll of the company. As per NCWA Smt . Nageshwari Devi is not entitled for employment. It has mentioned that in view of the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court appointment on compassionate ground cannot be made after long lapse of reasonable period. As Late Nagendra Singh was absenting from 2-2-1979 and died on 11-3-1983 , it cannot be said that he died in harness .

4. In the rejoinder portion it has been stated that the statement made in paras -2 , 3. 4, 7, 8 and 9 are not correct. Statement made in 5 and 6 are the matters of record. It has been prayed that Sint . Nageshwari Devi is not entitled for any relief.

5. On behalf of the concerned workman rejoinder has also been filed in which it has further been submitted that Late Nagendra Singh was permanent employee of Sendra Bansjora Colliery working as Peon since 14-11-73 , It has also been stated that it is not a fact that he absented from his duty w.e.f.. 1-2-79 till his death on 11-3-83 and he was all along on the roll of the company. He was not issued with any chargesheet for absenting from his duty nor any disciplinary proceeding was initiated till his death i.e. 11-3-83. The management never removed his name from the roll of the company and he was in service of the company till his death. There has been some delay but it is not due to the fault of the applicant but due to the callous attitude of the management. With regard to para-8 of W.S. of the management it has been said that Late Nagendra Singh was very much on the roll of the company at the time of his death. About the statement made in paras 15, 16 and 17 and 18 it has been denied and further stated that the stand of the concerned workman is correct. Prayer has been made to pass Award for providing employment to the widow of late Nagendra Singh.

6. POINTS TO BE DECIDED

"Whether the action of the management of Sendra Bansjora Colliery of M/s. BCCL in not providing employment to the widow Smt . Nageshwari Devi , 2. The case of the concerned workman in short is that Late Nagendra Singh was working as Peon in Sendra Bansjora Colliery as a permanent workman, Due to unavoidable circumstances he could not attend his duties for sometimes and the managerment failed to take any legal action in accordance with the provision of the Standing Order. He was on the roll of the company till the date of liis death as a permanent employee . As such he is fully entitled all the benefits and his dependant is also entitled for all the benefits after the death of Nagendra Singh in accordance with the service condition and law. Late Nagendra Singh, Peon, Sendra Bansjora Colliery was murdered during the service in the colliery premises on 11-3-1983 . The post-mortem of his dead body was done by the authority of the management . Al the time of murder of the concerned workman his children were minor and his widow was not in a position to work due to the death of her husband , She has authorised son - in- law for employment in place of his husband and requested the same to the management . The management did not consider the same and in the year 1991 the management communicated this decision to the widow of the deceased employee. The widow of the deceased employee applied to the management for employment for herself which was rejected by the management in July, 1992. Thus the allegation of the management that the widow applied to the management for employment after nine years of the death of her husband is not correct in the aforesaid circumstances. The stand of the management in not providing employment to the widow is not at all justified. The dispute was raised before the conciliation authorities in accordance with the provision of the I.D. Act. 1947 which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication . Prayer has been made to pass Award

1284GI/20086 1852

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19, 2008 /CHAITRA 30 , 1930 PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ) w/o Late Nagendra Singh , Peon who was murdered.

while in service in the Colliery premises is justified? If not , to what relief is Smt . Nageshwari Deví w/ o Late Nagendra Singh entitiled?"

7. FINDING WITH REASONS

To substantiate the claim the concerned workman hasproducedWW- 1 Nageshwari Devi w/ o Late Nagendra Singh and got exhibited Exs . W - 1 and W- 2 . On behalf of the management Mr. B.B. Srivastava , Senior Legal Inspector has been examined as MW- 1 . Two documents have been marked as Ext . M - 1 and Ext . M- 1 / 1.

11. To appreciate the argument ofboth the partics itis necessary to examine the evidence and materials on record . WW-1 has stated that her husband Nagendra Singh was posted as Peon at Sendra Bansjora Colliery who was murdered on 11-3-83 . He died leaving behind her three daughters and one son . Her husband had got appointment under the management on 14-11-1973 . After the death of her husband she submitted representation to the management for her employment on compassionate ground as children were minor at that time . Thereafter her prayer was not considered by the management and then she raised an industrial dispute . During cross- examination she has stated that ber husband remained absent continuously from duty w.e.f. 2-2-79. She does not know that the name of her husband was struck off from. the roll of the company. She has claimed employment on compassionate ground. But management refused to provide her employment by issuing a letter in the year 1991 .

8. Ld . Lawyer for the concerned workman has vehemently submitted that the concerned person viz. Late Nagendra Singh was an employce ofBCCL and he was murdered in the vear 1983. His wife had left Dhanbad out of fear. She is very poor lady having minor children and she is unable to maintain her family. She is an illiterate lady who can only put signature anyhow. She was not aware of the provision of employment of dependent . She was advised by the well wishers and then she approached the management for employment of the dependent but her prayer has been rejected merely on the ground ofdelayed case whereas there is no provision of limitation to file such application for employment on compassionate ground. Hence Award may be passed in favour of the wife of the deceased employee.

9. On the other hand Ld. Lawyer for the management has vehemently submitted that the concerned workınan started to remain absent from 2-2-79. He did not attend his work till 1983 when he was murdered. Thereafter in the year 1991 an application for employment on compassionate ground was filed. Since he was not the employee , in the above circumstances an application was filed with much delay and then the prayer for appointment was rejected and there is nojustification to allow wife of the deceased Nagendra Singh for giving employment on the compassionate ground.

12. So far the management witness is concerned he has also stated that the concerned workman stated remaining absent from duty w.e.f. 2-2-79 and then an information was received that the concerned workman was murdered in the year 1983. None of his relation submitted any application to the management for appointment on compassionate ground after his murder. Then Nageshwari Devi filed an application for - employment on compassionate ground which was not considered in view of the facts that the concerned workman was not on the roll of the company. During cross- examination he has stated that Nagendra Singh was posted at Sendra Bansjora Colliery. He was employed in the year 1971. No chargesheet was issued against Nagendra Singh under the provision of the Certified Standing Order. His name was struck off from the roll of the company for his unauthorised absence . Thercafter on recall he has provided two documents marked as Exts . M- 1 and M-1 / 1 which are orders and communication of orders of the management regarding rejection of the application of Nageshwari Devi .

13. Though the question has been raised that the concerned workman Late Nagendra Singh was absenm from 2-2-79 till his death nothing has been brought on record by the management to show that any enquiry was held in accordance with the provision of Certified Standing Order. There is nothing on record to show that the services of Late Nagendra Singh were terminated on the ground of his being absent . In fact , the provision for starting disciplinary proceeding on account of absence of an employee under the Certified Standing Order has not been disputed . No document has been produced to show that the name of Late Nagendra Singh was struck off before 11-3-83 which is the date on which Nagendra Singh is said to have been murdered which is also cvidetut from Ext . W- 1 . Ext. W- 2 shows that the name of 10. Ld. Lawyer for the concerned workman has pointed out that as per provision contained in certified standing order if a person remains absent a domestic enquiry is held and the disciplinary authority passes order which may include the punishment of dismissal from service. But in the instant case there is no fact on the record to show that the concerned workman was distnissed from the job. Thus he was very well in the service . His name stood on the roll of company. In this context he was referred Ext . W-2 in which it has been mentioned that the name of the concerned workman was struck off from 11-3-83 i.e. the date on which the concerned workman was murdered. As per NCWA - III there is provision relating to the employment of dependents . Since the concerned workman died in the service in the above circumstances his dependent is entitled for employment on compassionate ground.

[ भाग II- खंड 3( ii ) ]

1853

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19, 2008/चैत्र 30 , 1930

Late Nagendra Singh was struck off w.e.f. 11-3-83 from the roll of the colliery. Since there is no any other order ofdismissal ofthe concerned workman it cannot be said thathe was not in the service of the company when he is said to have been murdered ie. on 11-3-83.

14. From submission made on behalf of the management it appears that the prayer for appointracht on compassionate ground was rejected as the depeвбели of the concerned workman had applied with delay. In fact, provision for appointment on compassionate ground has not been disputed by the management. In this context it will be relevant to quote provision relating to the employment of the dependents which are contained In clause 9,4.1 and 9.4.2 . The same reads as follows:

"Provision of Employment te Dependents

Clause 9.4.1 : Employment would be providedto one dependent of workern disabled pennanently and those who meet with death while in service. This provision will be implemented as follows:

Clause 9.4.2 : Employment of one Dependant of the Workerwho dies while in service.

(i ) The dependant for his purpose means the wife/ husband as the case may be , unmarried daughter, son and legally adopted son. If no such direct dependant is available for employment , younger brother, widowed daughter /widowed daughter- in - law residing with the deceased and almost wholly dependant on the earnings of the deceased may be considered to be the dependant ofthe deceased.

( ii ) The dependant to be considered for employment should be physically fit and suitable for employment and agod not more than 35 years provided that the age limit shall not apply in the case ofspouse."

From a bare perusal of the aforesaid provision it does not appear that any time has been fixed for submission of application for appointment on compassionate ground.

15. In this context further provision ofemployment to dependantswho dies in harness has also been referred Which reads as follows :-

"Clause 10,4.1 of NCWA- II

Employment would be provided to one dependant ofworkers disabled permanently and those who meet with death while in service . This provision will be implemented as follows :-

Clause 110.4.2 : Employment of one Dependant of Worker who dles while in service. ofNCWA - II

( 1 ) The dependant for his purpose means the wife/ husband as the case may be ,, unmarried daughter, son and legally adopted son. If no such direct dependant is available for employment , younger brother, widowed daughter/widowed daughter- in -law or son-in- law residing with the deceased and almost. wholly dependant on the earnings of the deceased may be considered to be the dependant of the deceased.

(ii) The dependant to be considered for employment should be physically fit and suitable for employment and aged not more. than35 years provided that the age limit shall not apply in the case of spouse. "

From perusal of the aforesaid provision itdoes not appear that there is any limitation in regard to the submission of application for appointment on . compassionate ground. All it appears that in case of spouse there is no limitation of age .

15. From perusal of Ext . M- 1 / 1 it appears that the prayer ofNageshwari Devi was rejected only on the ground of delayed case of employment . The relevant portion ofM -1 / 1 reads as follows:-

BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED SIJUA AREA Dated: 22/26-6-92 GM: SA: PD: 1235/4434 : 92

The Dy. C.M.E. ,

Sendra Bansjora Colliery.

Sub:-Case of Smt, Nageshwari Devi w/o Late Nagender: Singh. :

Sir,

Please refer to your letter No. SB/ PD/92/32/3310 dated 2-1-92. Enclosing herewith the application for employment of Smt . Nageshwari Devi , widow of Late Nagender Singh, Ex-Peon ofyour Colliery.

We regret that since it is a delayed case of employment the same cannot be considered for employment . The original application is returned herewith with request that Smt . Nageshwari Devi may be informed accordingly from your end.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-Illegible 25-2-92

Dy. C.P.M".

Thus this rejection letter also shows that the prayer of Nageshwari Devi has been rejected only on the ground that she had applied with delay.

16. On being asked repeatedly the Ld . Lawyer for the management has not stated whether there is any 1854

PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19 , 2008/ CHAITRA 30. 1930

नई दिल्ली, 19 मार्च , 2008

limitation or there is time fixed for submission of application for appointment on compassionate ground. No rule, circular or letter has been shown that any time was fixed for submission of application for the said period. Therefore , it appears that at the relevant time there was no limitation or time fixed for submission of application for appointment on compassionate ground .

का. आ. 865.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मैं. जैट एयरवेज के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के योत्र, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय ( सं. ) , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी-2/ 28 /2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-3-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-11012/ 16/ 2004 - आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जबास , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi . the 39th March . 2008 17.. Ld. Lawyer for the management has filed two decisions reported in 2005 SCC ( L & S) 927 and 2007 (11 ) JLIR page 659. However, it appears that the facts and circumstances are different as it appears that in the aforesaid cases there were provision regarding time of submission of application for appointment on compassionate ground whereas in the instant case no provision has been shown regarding time limit for submission of application .

S.O. 865.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. CGIT- 2/28/2004 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court ( No - 2 ) , Mumbai now as shown in the annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s Jet Airways and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 19-3-2008,

No. L- 11012/16/2004 - IR ( C - 101 SNEH LATA JAWAS . Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI

18. From submission made on behalf of the concerned workman as well as from the materials on record it appears that the wife of Late Nagender Singh has left this place of Dhanbad as her husband was murdered . From evidence of wife of Late Nagender Singh it appears that her husband was a Peon , She was having minor children. It further appears that she is not well educated. It has also been submitted that she was not aware of the provision of NCWA for appointment on compassionate ground . When the well wishers advised her that there is provision of employment on compassionate ground then she approached the management for her employment .

PRESENT :

A.A. Lad, Presiding Officer

Reference No. CGIT - 2/ 28 of 2004 EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF JET AIRWAYS 19. As discussed earlier the application of Nageshwari Devi has been rejected on the ground of delayed case but there is no provision of time limitation regarding submission of application at the relevant time. Itappears in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case the wife of the concerned workman is entitled for the relief as prayed for.

20. For the reasons stated above the following Award is rendered:-

M/ s . Jet Airways ( India ) Pvt . Ltd. S.M. Centre , Andheri Kurla Road. Andehri (E) , Mumbai 400 059

AND

THEIR WORKMEN :

"The action ofthe management of Sendra Bansjora Colliery of M/ s . BCCL in not providing employment to the widow , Smt. Nageshwari Devi , w/ o Late Nagendra Singh , Peon who was murdered while in service in the colliery premises is not justified. Consequently, Nageshwari Devi w/o of Late Nagendra Singh, is entitled for employment under the management . "

Mr. Anil M. Chaugule , Senior Security Assistant . Dagdi Building . Chaugule House, Flat No. 13 , Dharavi Cross Road . Mumbai 400 017

APPEARANCES :

For the Employer

21. The management is directed to implement the Award within three months from the date of its publication in the Gazette of India in the light of the above observation

:M / s Abhay Kulkarni and Associates , Advocates NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer For the Workman : Mr. G.1 . Fernandes , Advocate 1855 [ भाग 11-खंड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19, 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

Mumbai , dated 4th February, 2008

AWARD

concerned workman was working with the first party which is dealing with business in airline industry having great responsibility of security of passengers lives and property. When it lost confidence of second party, first partyhas no other option but to terminate such employes So it is submitted that , prayer prayed by the concerned workman on all grounds required to be rejected.

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L- 11012/ 16/ 2004 IR (C - I) dated 28-6-2004 in exercise of the power conferred by clause (d) of sub- section (1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

" क्या मैसर्स जेट एअरवेज ( इं ) प्रा. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र द्वारा श्री अनिल एम. चौगुले वरिष्ठ सुरक्षा सहायक को दिनांक 19-5-2003 से बर्खास्त किया जाना उचित, विधिवत् एवं न्यायसंगत है ? यदि नहीं तो कर्मकार किस राहत के पात्र हैं ? "

5. In view of above pleadings, issues were framed atEx- 18 . Out of those , issue no . 1 of ' Workman' is taken as a-preliminary issue since first party has emphasized that said issue to be decided at an earlier stage . Agreeing with the contention of first party, issue of workman ' is taken for decision which is as follows :

Issues

Findings

1. Whether second party is aworkman ?

No 2. Claimi statement is filed by the concerned workman at Ex-6 making out case that , he joined first party as a Security Assistant on 16-11-94 . His salary was Rs. 14,319 when he was terminated.

REASONS

6. Second party workman claimed that, he joined first party as a Security Assistant in 1994 and was terminated without following due process of law and without holding enquiry. Whereas, case of first party is that, since second party is not a ' workman ' , question of following procedure does not arise.

3. First party gave show cause notice dated 28-3-2002 referring number of documents and events . It was replied by the concerned workman . Said explanation was received by the first party on 1-4-2002. However no enquiry was conducted. No charge was proved against concernedworkman. Hence letters on two different dates were issued . The decision taken was not taken as per the standing orders applicable to first party. So it is submitted that, action taken by first party be set aside with direction to first partyto reinstate him in service with full back wages and continuity of service.

7. To prove that second party place reliance on his affidavit filed in lieu of examination -in -chief Ex- 19 where he made out case that , duties performed by him were of physical checking of passengers travelling by Jet Airways flight. He has to report to Supervisor of Shift Incharge. He has no power to sanction leave or recommend any body for promotion According to him, he was not performing supervisory duties or administrative work. He also claims that , he has no power to sanction voucher or implement judgement or job appraisal . He also clatius that, he has no power to take disciplinary action or any power to take administrative decision . In the cross, he says that , he was providing information to Security Assistants and Traince Security Assistant . He admits that, work of checking passengers and physical checkup of passengers is not simple clerical work . He admits that, he has to report regarding entry of each flight and its details and maintaining luggage register of each flight . He also admits that, he has to attend duty of reponing theft, missing passenger articles and baggage . He was also responsible for maintaining record maintained by TrafficAssistant in respect of passengers .He adruits that. he was BA in Economics and passed Personal Management Diploma, He was also responsible for detecting weapons carriedby passengers. He admits that supervisors are designated on the basis of seniority. Against that, first party has not led any evidence . :

8. Second party filed written arguments at Ex- 21 and first party at Ex -22 .

4. It is disputed by first party by filing replyEx- 15 objecting the claim of the second party by taking basic contention that, second party is not a ' workman ' . He joined first party as a Trainee Security Assistant . Then he was made permanent. He was promoted to post of Sr. Security Assistant on 1-4-1999 drawing salary of Rs. 11.319 . He was responsible for supervision and control ofjob performedby Trainee Security Assistant as well as Security Assistant . He was also responsible for taking decisions under the advice of his superiors while performing his duties . It is stated that , concerned workman is not a ' workman' under Section 2 (s ) of the Industrial Disputes Act . The reimbursement medical bill ofconcerned workman about medicines taken for wife and father were bogus and fraudulent. Besides bilis were bevond date of claim and by making alterations and additions in the said bills , he brought those within the period ofclaim which was verified by first party's officer by visiting concerned medical stores which revealed that, bills were bogus and false , Even he changed the months of the said bills to bring period of the bill within admissible period of reimbursement Management enquired with the concerned medical stores and other machineries and they decided to remove concerned workman which is just and proper. In such an investigation, concerned workman is not entitled to participate as it was a preliminary investigation . Since 1856

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19 , 2008/ CHAITRA 30 , 1930

42. While deciding Civil Appeal No. 1776 (NL) of 1984, Apex court observed:

9. Here, before us we have preliminary point of workman ,According to first party, second party is not a ' workman ' which is denied by second party.

10 So let us first see definition of workman as given under Section 2 ( s ) of Industrial Disputes Act , which reads like this :

[ "workman " means any person ( including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any manual , unskilled , technical, operational, clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward, whether the terms of employment be express or implied, and for the purposes of any proceeding under this Act in relation to an industrial dispute, includes any such person who has been dismissed. discharged or retrenched in connection with or as a consequence of, that dispute , or whose dismissal , discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person:

( i) who is subject to the Air Force Act , 1950 (45 of 1950 ) , or the Army Act , 1950 (46 of 1950) , or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), or

( ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a prison, or

(iii ) who, being employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity, or

(iv) who, being employed in a supervisory capacity, draws wages exceeding one thousand six handed rupees per mensem or exercises , either by the nature ofthe duties attached to the office or by reason of the power vested in him. functions mainly of a managerial nature . " |

A workman ' was then defined as any person employed in any industry to do any skilled or unskilled manual or clerical work for hire or reward. Therefore, doing manual or clerical work was necessary before a person could be called a workman . This definition came for consideration before industrial tribunals and it was consistently held that the designation of the employee was not of great moment and what was of importance was the nature of his duties . If the nature of the duties is manual or clerical , then the person must be held to be a workman . On the other hand , if manual or clerical work is only a small part of the duties of the person concerned and incidental to his main work which is not manual or clerical , then such a person would not be a workman . It has , therefore, tobe seen in each case from the nature of the duties whether a person employed is a workman or not . under the definition of that word as it existed before the amendment of 1956. The nature of the duties ofMukerjee is not in dispute in this case and the only question therefore is whether looking to the nature of the duties it can be said that Mukerjice was workman within the meaning of Section 2 (s ) as it stood assigned to Mukerjee that his main work was that of canvassing and any clerical or manual work that he had to do was incidental to his work of canvassing and could not take more than a small fraction of the time for which he had to work, In the circumstances the Tribunal's conclusion that Mukerjee was a workman is incorrect. The tribunal seems to have been led away by the fact that mukerjee had no supervisory duties and had to work under the directions of his superior officers .That, however would not necessarily mean that Mukerjee's duties were mainly manual or clerical. From what the tribunal itself has found it is clear that Mukerjee's duties were mainly neither clerical nor manual . Therefore , as Mukerjee was not a workman, his case would not be covered by the Industrial Disputes Act and the tribunal would have uo jurisdiction to order his reinstatement. Wc . therefore , set aside the order of the tribunal directing reinstatement of Mukerjee along with other reliefs.

11. As per this, essential condition of person being a workman within terms of this definition is that , he should be employed to do the work . The prime facie test is the existence of the right in the master to supervise and control the work done by the servant not only in the matter directing what servant has to do but also the manner in which he shall do his work . The nature of work will help in deciding whether he is workman or not. To determine the status of such employee , one has to consider the nature of duties ofthe functions assigned to such person . Employee must he held to be employee to do that work which is the main work he is required to do even though he may be having incidental duties . Person working on technical site covers person doing work of skilled work, manual work and it is not necessary to confine to work by application of hands but comprises of work involved physical exertion as distinct from mental or intellectual exertia . If a person is doing mainly supervisory work but incidentally or for fraction of time also does some clerical work it would have been held that he is employed in supervisory capacity.

13. In the above case . Apex Court observed that, when duties were neither mainly clerical nor manual , in that case, such employee cannot be called as ' workman . In the present case , workman involved is designated as a "Senior Security Assistant" . His salary was Rs . 14,319 which is beyond the scale of the workman given in the Industrial Disputes Act . Besides in the cross as referred. he admits that, he was checking passengers physically 12. Besides , learned advocate for first party produced copy of citation published in 1988 ( 4 ) SCC page [भाग -खंड 3 ( ii) ]

1857

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19 , 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

नईदिल्ली, 20 मार्च, 2008

का. आ. 866.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1987 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. सी.सी. छैन. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और इनके कर्मकारों के बीफ, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक अधिकरण ( सं. - 1 ) , धनुवाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 18/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-3-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-20012/209/98-आई आर ( सी-1) ] स्नेह संता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi, the 20th March, 2008

5.0. 866.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 18/ 99) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court (No.-1 ) Dhanbad now as shown in the annex in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s CCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 20-3-2008.

[No. L-20012/209/98-IR (C-4)] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD

Inthe matter of a reference under Section 10( 1 ) ( d)( 24) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947

Reference No. 18 of 1999

PARTIES :

Employers in relation to the management of Govindpur project of M/s C.C.L.

which is not a simple clerical work. Even he admits that , hewas filling the form of flight details and maintaining record of luggage and flights. He was also responsible for recording theft , missing passenger articles and missing baggage and noticing weapons possessed by passengers which ate responsible job . He was also responsible for maintaining record of Traffic Assistants workingunder him sufficient to call him as not workman Simply because he was not authorised to sanction leave or sign cash vouchers , or power to take any disciplinary action or power to allot duties , or participate in the decision making, does not allow him to be called as workmen'. On the contrary, work assigned to him and attended by him was more responsible work than all above duties which he had referred in his examination- in -chief totreat him as workman, In my considered view, checking passengers and detecting weapons while entering into aircraft is more responsible job than sanctioning anybody's leave or signing any vouchers or recommending any body for promotion . The place where the employee is working, one has to consider it and one has to give regard to that . In that case , workman worked as per directions . But here, the employee who is involved in reference was not working under anybody's directions while checking the passengers and objecting them to entering in the flight while carrying weapons. It is he, who is the master at his place who can prevent a passenger in entering in to aircraft if such passenger carries any objectionable article. In that place , he is the master and sole person who has the power to take decision at that place. So definitely thejob on which concerned workman was working cannot be compared with workman or definition ofworkman as given under Industrial Disputes Act . Besides Apex Court gave some guidelines while deciding case of Government of Goa Daman and Diu in The Appeal filed by Miss A. Sundarambal ( Supra) where it is observed that , if an employee was neither mainly doing clerical nor manual work cannot be called as a workman'.

AND

Their workman

PRESENT :

14. Affidavit of second party refers some citation Ex-22but did not take pain in submitting copies ofthose tohelp me to take benefit of it to treat him as a workman.

Shri Nagendra Kumar , Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES :

For the Management Shri D.K. Verma. Advocates:

15. So ifwe consider all these coupled with case inade out byboth , I conclude that, the employee involved inthe reference i.e. Anil M. Chaugule is not a workman' as defined under provisions of Industrial Disputes Act. So I answer above issues to that effect .

For the Workman :Shri Shantosh Kumar and Pran Workman at Sl . No. 51 and 67

State: Jharkhand Industry: Coal

16. Since second party is not a ' workman ', he is not entitled for protection under Industrial DisputesAct. So the reference requires to be rejected. Hence the order ; "

ORDER

Dated 11th March, 2008

AWARD

Reference is rejected as second party is not a workman' .

Date : 4-2-2008

A.A. LAD, Presiding Officer

By order No. L-20012/209/98- IR (Coal -I ) dated 29-1-99 the Central government in the Ministry ofLabour has in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of 1858

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19 , 2008/CHAITRA 30, 1930

नई दिल्ली, 20 मार्च, 2008

sub -section ( 1 ) and sub -section (2A) of section 10 of the industrial disputes Act , 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

SCHEDULE

का. आ. 867.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मैं. आई.आई.एस.सी.ओ. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण ( सं. - 11 ) धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 164/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार की 20-3-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the action of the management of Govindpurproject , CCLPO. -Bokaro Thermal Dist . Bokaro in not regularing 92 PR workers ( as per list submitted by the union) to time rated category is justified ? If not, to what relief the worknion arc entitled 10 ?

[सं. एल-20012/53/97- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 20th March, 2008

5.0. 867. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 164/ 98) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court (No. -2) Dhanbad now as shown in the annexure. in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s L.I.S.C.O. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 20-3-2008 .

After having received the Order No. L-20012/209/ 98 - IR ( Coal - I )-dt. 29-1-1999 the aforesaid reference from the Govt. of India . Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute a reference case No. 18 of 99 was registered on 8-2-99 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notice through the registered post to the parties concerned directing them to appear in the Court on the date fixed and fite their written statement along with the relevant document and a list of witnesses in support of their claim . In compliance of the said order notices were issued to the parties concerned . Sri Lakhan Lal Mehto, Area Secretary of United coal workers Union Kathara Arca. P.O. Bokaro Thermal , Dist . Bokaro appeared in the Tribunal .

No. L- 20012/53/ 97 - IR (C - 1 ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL COVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO . 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT ;

From the perusal of the order sheet of the record it transpires that both the parties have filed their written statement and rejoinder in support of their claim From the side of the workmen few Zerox copies of documents as also been filed on 14-6-2002 and the case was placed for filling of documents by the Management as also to adduce evidence by the management .

Shri Nagendra Kumar, Presiding Officer In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10( 1)(d) of the I.D. Act . 1947 Reference No. 164 of 1998 PARTIES :

Employers in relation to the management of IISCO AND

On 10-3-2008 Sri Shantosh Kumar the workman at Sl . No. 51 and Sri Pran workman at Sl . No. 67 found present in the Tribunal and filed their attendance along with a petition signed by Sri Lakhan Lal Mahto President of the sponsoring Union and submitted that Sri Mahto has fallen sick today. And as such he is not present personally but pressing his petition both submit that the workman's demand has already been accepted by the management . They further submitted that they did not want to contest this case and want to withdraw this casc .

Their workтал APPEARANCES : On behalf of the employers Mr. D.K. Verma, Advocates .

Sri D.K. Verma the learned Lawyer of the management has submitted that the management has no objection in withdrawing the case of the workmen .

: None

On behalf of the Workmen State : Jharkhand

Industry: Coal In view of such circumstances stated by theboth the parties the following order is made . ORDERED

Dated, Dhanbad the 10th March , 2008 AWARD

That let a "No Dispute Award be and the same is passed. Send the copies of the Award to the GovI. of India . Ministry of Labour and Employment . New Delhi for information and needful . Reference is accordingly disposed of.

TheGovt. of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) of the I.D. Act. , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/53/97 - IR (Coal - 1 ) , dated, the 20th March , 1998 .

NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer [ भाग II- खंड ( 1 ) ]

1859

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 19, 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

SCHEDULE

"Whether the demand of the union for regularisation of the services of S/ Shri Dhiraj Das andothers ( as per enclosures) with the management of Chasnalla Colliery of Tasra Railway siding of M/ s . IISCO, is justified ? If so to what relief is the concerned workmen entitled to ?"

2. The case of the concerned workmen Sri Dhiraj Das and other concerned workmen as per list is that they had been working at Tasta Railway Biding of Chasnalla Colliery since last 16-17 years continuously. The concerned workmen had been working in the permanent and continuous nature of job in accordarice with the direction and supervision of the management . The concerned workmen had been performing jobs of shale picking, picking of other impurities , coal breaking, wagon levelling, track eleaning etc. These were being done by the concerned workmen under the control and supervision ofthe management within the precincts and premises of the management . The implements for execution of the jobs are supplied by the management. The coficerned workmen are permanent employees of the management for all purposes but they are being paid less wages below the prescribed rate of NCWA in the name of alleged intermediaries. The concerned workmen represented before the management several times for their regularisation and for payment of atleast Cat. I wages butwithout any effect . Accordingly an industrial dispute was raised which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal . The action ofthe management is illegal , invalid and discriminatory. Prayer has been made to direct the management to regularise the concerned workmen with retrospective effect atleast as Cat . 1 Mazdoor with all arrears ofwages and attendant benefits..

3. The case of the management as disclosed from the W.S.-cum-rejoinder is that no employer -employee relationship exists between the management and the concerned persons . The schedule of reference containing 20 persons and the list of contractors workers ofM/s R.B. Traders shows involvement of 21 persons . Some of them are outsiders and have never worked under any capacity under any contractor at Tasta Railway Siding. M/s. R.B. Traders was awarded contract for transporting coal from the washery to the railway siding on the terms and conditions embodied in the work order issued in their favour: From perusal of the W.S. it appears that for the purpose oftransportation the contractor M /s. R.B. Traders have deputed several staff. The contractors select their own workmen, recruited them paid them wages and their jobes were supervised by their men . The management has got no concern with the workmen of the contractor engaged for the jobs for which contract was given. Accordingly the concerned worknten are not entitled to getanyrelief.

1284GI/2008-7

4. In the rejoinder portion statement made in para- 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 , 12, 13 , 14, 15 made in the W.S. of the concerned workmen have been denied and are saidto be incorrect . Prayer has been made on behalf of the management to pass Award holding that the concerned persons are not entitled for any relief.

5. Points to be Decided

"Whether the demand of the union for regularisation of the services of S/Shri Dhiraj Das andothers (as per enclosures ) with the management of Chasnalla Colliery of Tasra Railway Siding of M/s . IISCO is justified ? If so to what relief are the concerned workmen entitled to ?"

6. Finding with Reasons

Inspite of giving several opportunities, the concernedworkmen have not produced any witness and. any document in support of their claim. The burden of proof rests upon the concerned workmen to prove their case. Thus there is no material on record to hold that the concerned persons are entitled for relief as prayed for. In. the result, the following Award is rendered:

"The demand of the union for regularisation ofthe services of S/Shri Dhiraj Das and others (as per enclosures) with the management of Chasnalla Colliery ofTasra Railway Siding of M/ s . lISCO is not justified , Consequently, the concerned workinen are not entitled to get any relief. "

NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer Name

Father'sName

S/Sh.

S/ Sh.

1. Kishore Kumar Manjhi Bhogilal Manjhi

Nirmal Ram Satnani

2. Premcharid Satnani

Agardas Mahant

3. Rajudas Mahant

4. Khik Bad

Dhiraj Das :

5. Lokhi Manjhi

Late Sitau Manjhi

6. Set Kunwar

BhuniaDas

7. Sukhi Mezban

RathulalBaskey

8.. Savitri Bai

Harihar Ram Satmani 9. Indira Bai

Rajudas Mahant

Dukalu Kewat

10. Ashmati

Dasaram Kewat

11. Sukuana Bai

12. Chotelal Sahin

Alha Ram

13. Ballal Sahin

Nirmal Ram Satnani

14. Ram Prasad Satnani

15. Harihar Ram Satnani Late Mehtar Ram

Satnani

16. Alharam

Nathuram

Late Jal Das

17. Bhurua Das

KamalDas

18. Dhiraj Das

19. Dasaram Kewat

Late Antu Ram

Kewat

Dhinn Ram Satnani

20. Bhisam Sainani Total Twenty Workmen 1860

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19 , 2008 /CHAITRA 30, 1930

नई दिल्ली, 24 मार्च, 2008

का. आ. 868.- औद्योगिकक्विाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.- II , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 1182/2005) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-3-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -22012/438/2004- आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 24th March, 2008 S.O. 868. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (No. Ref. 1185/ 2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court No. II , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 24-3-2008.

[No. L-22012/438/ 2004 - IR ( CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT- II , SECTOR 18 - A, CHANDIGARH Shri Kuldip Singh , Presiding Officer Case I.D. No .: 1185/2005

Registered on : 3-10-2005 Date ofDecision : 14-3-2008

Bahadur Singh

C/o Sh. Amarjit Singh Jattan & Sanjeev Kumar Bawa , ARs House No. 2782,

Petitioner Phase 7, Mohali .

Versus

[PART II- SE , 3 ( i ) ) consideration of this Tribunal and if they wish and are entitled under law to prosecute the same . they can approach the Tribunal , But the record of the file shows that the registered cover sent was received back with the report that the addressee is dead. The legal representatives ofthe deceased workman have not approached so far nor there is any other evidence on record to show that the workman has left behind LRs who are entitled to be substitued for him.

Ministry of Labour, Government of India vide their orderNo. L -22012/438/2004 - IR (CM- II ) dated 29-8-2005 referred the dispute in the terms " Whether the action of the Management of Food Corporation of India in terminating the services of Sh. Bahadur Singh , Beldar w.e.f. October, 1992 is legal and justified ? If not to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date ? " for the adjudication of this Tribunal . The Tribunal issued notices of the reference to the parties who appeared and filed the statements of their respective claims . The Management supported their claim with the affidavit of their Arca Manager and with photocopies of a number of documents whereas the workman has failed to file even his affidavit . He has also not produced any other evidence in support of his claim. On record I do not find any evidence to show that the workman was engaged by the Management and they had terminated his services in Oct. , 1992 and that their that action was not legal and justified . Whatever claim the workman made, the Management denied the same in their written statement and supported the same with the affidavit of theit witness and photocopies of the documents . In the circumstances the reference is answered against the workmanholding that he is not entitled to any relief.

Let a copy ofthis award be sent to the appropriate government for necessary action and the file be consigned to records after due completion .

KULDIP SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 24 मार्च , 2008

Respondent

The District Manager, FCI . Sangrur (Punjab ) .

APPEARANCE

For the Workman : Mr. S. K. Bawa, Advocate For the Management : Mr. N. K. Zakhmi , Advocate

AWARD

On 20th ofNov. , 2007 , it was brought to the notice of the Tribunal that the workman has died . Thereupon a noticeunder registered cover was issued to the workman to confirm the statement and also inform his legal representatives that the cause of the workman is pending का. आ. 869.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संबार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरंग/ श्रम न्याय़ालय नं.- II , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 739/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-3-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/395/1999- आई आर ( डो यू) ] सुरेंद्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 24th March , 2008

S.O. 869. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) . the Central Government hereby publishes the Award 1861 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 19, 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

[ भाग II- खंड ३( ii) ]

(Ref. No.739/2005) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No., II Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofDepartment of Telecom and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 24-3-2008.

[No. L-400 2/395/ 1999- IR (DU) ) SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

reference from this Tribunal, the parties appeared and filed their respective claims qua the reference. The workman supported his claim with his affidavit whereas the Management filed the affidavit of their witness. TheParties also placed on record Photocopies of some documents . Part statement of the workman was also recorded,but since the same could not be completed for want ofpresence of the workman, therefore , the same cannot be read. Thus the documents produced by the parties are not proved in accordance with law and the same cannot be read in the case.

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- D, SECTOR 18- A, CHANDIGARH

Shri Kuldip Singh , Presiding Officer

Case LD . No.: 739/2005

Registered on : 2-9-2005.

Date of Decision : 14-3-2008

Paramjit Singh

Sto Jagir Singh

C/ o Shri N. K. Ject,

President,

Telecom Labour Union,

Petitioner

Harinagar , Bhatinda.

Versus

General Manager,

Telecom , Bhatinda.

Respondent

APPEARANCE

For the Workman : Mr. N. K. Jeet, AR

For the Management : Mr.G. C. Babbar , Advocate

AWARD

Onrecord I do not find evidence to show that the workman had served in the office of S.D.O, Telephone, Mansa on a permanent job from Ist of Sept, 1993 to 1-3-1999 on a monthly salary of rupees 2610 per month; and that the Management had terminated his services without notice charge sheet , enquiry and compensation. TheManagement has denied this claim of the workman in their written statement . According to them the workman was neither engaged nor disengaged by the Management as they had contract with Messrs J. S. Choudhary, Hissar for providing labour to the Management during the period in question. They have placed a copy of the contract on record duly attested by D. E Legal of the Management. The workman has failed to produce evidence to support his claim and rebut that the Management. Since there is no evidence on recordto show that the workman was engaged by the Management; and that he had served them from Ist of Sept. , 1993 to Ist ofMarch , 1999; and that it was the Management which hadterminated his services without notice, charge sheet, enquiry and payment of compensation, therefore, he is not entitled to any relief. The reference is answered againsthim.

Let acopy of this award be sent to the appropriate government for necessary action and the file be condigned to records after due completion.

KULDIP SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 27 मार्च, 2008

The workman continues to be absent . He last attended the Tribunal along with his representative on 10th April , 2007. His part statement was recorded on that date but thereafter he stopped appearing in person. On the request of his representative further opportunity ' was given to the workman to produce his evidence . But this is the third date thereafter that he has not appeared to complete his statement nor has produced any evidence. His representative has also stopped appearing for him. The Tribunal had passed a conditional order that in case the workman does not produce his evidence on 2nd of April, 2008 , the same shall be deemed to have been closed. It is in these circumstances the evidence of the workman has been closed.

का. आ . 870.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकम दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके वार्मकमों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिका अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं.- II, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्मा 102/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-3- 2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था। !

(सं. फूल-40032/48/2005 -आई आर ( डी यू) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi, the 27th March, 2008

S.O. 879. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central TheMinistry of Labour, Government of India vide their order No. L -40012/395/ 99/IR(DU) dated 17th Feb. , 2000 desired of this Tribunal to find out "whether the action of the Management of General Manager, Telecom , Bhatinda in terminating the services of Sh . Paramjit Singh s/o Sh . Jagir Singh is legal and justified ? If not,to what relief the workman is entitled and from which date?" On getting the notice of the 1862

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 19 , 2008 / CHAITRA 30, 1930

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 102/ 2005 ) Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court No. II New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 27-3-2008 .

[No. L -40012/ 48/2005- IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT -11 , NEW DELHI

R. N. Rai , Presiding Officer

L D. NO. 102/2005

IN THE MATTER OF :

Sh. Satya Prakash Sharma , Vill & PO: Patai Khalsa .

Distt:Ainroha, Jyoti Ba Phule Nagar U.P. Amroha (UP).

Versus

1. The General Manager , CMTS , Jyoti Palace. Shastradhara Road , Dehradun .

2. D/o . Telecom , Dy. Secretary ( Admn. ) , Sanchar Bhawan, New Delhi - 110001 .

AWARD

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L-40012/ 48/2005 IR ( DU) Central Government Dt . 11-8-2005 has referred the following point for adjudication:

The point runs as hereunder :

"Whether the workman Shri Satya Prakash Sharma was employed continuously w.e.f. 1-3-1997 to 10-3-2003 as a Driver in Bharat Sanchar Nigam (CMTS ) under Chief General Manager, BSNL , Meerut ? If so, his termination/disengagement from the service without any notice and compensation is legal and justified ? If not to what relief the concerned person is entitled ? "

That the workman above named has been employed with the management above named since 1st March, 1997 till the illegal and malafide termination/ retrenchment of his services with effect from 10th May, 2003 as a Driver .

That the workinan during the course of his service has driven various vehicle of the management which were

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] used by the officers of the management above named particularly Car No , UP 25 V 1172 , UP 07 J 9429 and UP 07 J 6612 .

That for Car No. 25 V 1172 , UP 07 9429 and UP 07 6612 the management above named is the registered owner.

That the workman was working under the direct supervision and control of the management for which he was paid his wages through vouchers .

That during the course of his services the workman gave no cause of complaint to the management for any reason whatsoever.

That vacant/ sanctioned posts of a Driver is available with the management and the job of a driver is of and an essential and perennial nature .

That accordingly the workman moved the Hon ble CAT, principal Bench Delhi vide OA No. 236/2002 and the Hon'ble High Court of Uttranchal vide case No. 182 (S/B) of 2003 wherein the management was directed to consider the workman's case for regularization, That on account of the above said cases the management got prejudiced against the workman and decided to teach the workman a lesson by terminating his services.

That accordingly the services of the workman were terminated orally by the management with effect from 10thMay, 2003.

That the workman had been in continuous services of the management since the date of his employment till the date of the terruination of his services . The workman had completed more than 240 days in each year of services and also in the 12 months preceding the date of termination of his services .

That the workman was not paid any money whatsoever or notice wages or retrenchment compensation in terms of Section 25 (f) of the ID Act. 1947.

That also the rule of last come first go was not followed while terminating the workman's services.

That consequent upon the termination of the services of the workman the management has employed fresh hand without offering reemployment to the workman.

That since the illegal termination of his services the workman despite his best efforts has been unable to secure any employment and was on the verge of starvation .

That the present dispute is being raised by the workman under section 2 (A) of the ID Act , 1947 .

The management has filed written statement , in the written statement it has been stated that the applicant 1863 [ भाग 11-खंड 3(ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल19, 2008 /चैत्र 30, 1930

From perusal of the pleadings of the parties the following issues arise for adjudication:-

was employed as a Driver under the respondents we.f. 1-3-1997.It was worthwhile to highlight that in the year 1997 and even as of now there is no sanctioned post of Driver under the opposite parties .

1. Whether the workman has completed 240 days work in a calendar year in between his employment.. w.e.f. 1-3-1997 10 10-3-2003 ?

2. Whether there is employer - employee relationship.. between the management and the workman ? 1

3. Whether the workman is entitled to reinstatement ?

4. To what amount of back wages the workman applicant is entitled to ?. :

5. Whether this Tribunal/Court has jurisdiction to try . this reference ? ..

That the applicant was never employed as a Driver by the respondent to drive the vehicles as alleged in his application. At best the applicant might have been employed by the various contractors who had undertaken to execute works /contracts with the respondent including maintenance and running of company vehicles from time to time. It is relevant to submit that the contracts as per above were not against perennial nature of works but were against particular works/projects which have also came to an end . There is no master and servant relationship between the claimant and the management.

ISSUE NO . 1

11was submitted from the side ofthe workman that he drove the Vehicles ofthe respondentswhich were used by the Officers of the management. Car No. Up 25 V1 1172, Up 07 J 9429 and Up 07 J 6612. He worked under the direct supervision and control of the management.

That since no relationship of employer-employee existed between the opposite parties and the applicant hence the question of termination of his services by the opposite parties does not arise at all . As far as the opposite party management of M /s . BSNL is concerned, neither the procedure of retrenchment was attracted or was required to be followed.

It was further submitted that the workman moved CAT and the Hon'ble High Court of Uttranchal . The management was directed to consider the workman's case.. of regularization . The management got prejudiced on account of the said case and terminated his services illegally and arbitrarily.

That the applicant must be put to strict proof ofhis alleged contentions regarding existence of employer employee relationship between the opposite party and him and having continuously worked for more than 240 days without any break during the preceding 12 calendar months. i

That the provision of Section 25 F of the ID Act, 1947 were neither attracted nor required to be followed as far as the opposite parties were concerned.

That the alleged claim of the applicant regarding regularization under the opposite parties was not only ill-conceived but was illegal too.

Itwas submitted from the side of the management that there was no sanctioned post in 1997 and there is no sanctioned post even today. The workman might have been employed by the various contractors who have undertaken to execute work/contract with the respondent including maintenance and running of company vehicles from time to time. The work is not of perennial nature. There is no master and servant relationship between the management and the workman. So far as the management is concerned there is no procedure of reinstatement . The provisions of ID Act, 1947 are not applicable . The workman has not completed 240 days service in any calendar year or within 12 calendar months preceding the date of his termination .

The management is an Industry and the provisions of the ID Act, 1947 are applicable. It is needless to dilate this matter further.

That the present complaint application is misconceived and not maintainable since the complainant had already moved the Ld. CAT, New Delhi and Hon'ble High Court of Nainital ( Uttranchal) by filing requisite application and writ petition . The orders passed in writ petition stand implemented and a contempt petition filed was also dismissed. Under the circumstances, the present complaint application is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed.

The workman has filed rejoinder. In the rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement. The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement .

Evidence ofboth the parties has been taken .

MW1 has admitted that there is no document of contractor. No document of any contract has been filed. The workman has been directly engaged by the management . Annexure 5 , B -245 is photocopy of the order of SDE. This document has not been denied and the original is presumed to be in the possession of the management. On 26-11-2001 the SDE has written to AGM (ESL) for regularization of this workman. Paper, No. B -249 is also a photocopy document written by Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.

1864

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19 , 2008/ CHAITRA 30, 1930 [PART II- St . 3 ( ii ) | SDE to the AGM ( Est . ) . In this letter also request has been made for regularization of the workman.

My attention was further drawn to AIR 2002 SC 1313. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that daily . wager even if serving for a short period should be reinstated.

Besides these two documents which have not been denied by the management , the workman has filed Log Books. Photocopy of Log Books , B - 27 10 B - 162, These photocopies of Log Books contain the seal of the management . The worknman has filed the receipt of petrol purchased. These documents establish to the hilt that the workman has worked for 240 days in every year.

Itwas submitted from the side of the workman inat in the instant case Section 25 F. G of the ID Act are attracted. In Section 25 of the ID Act it has been provided that if a workman has performed 240 days work and if the work is of continuous and regular nature he should be given pay in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensation.

It has been held by the Hon'ble Apex Court that there is no cessation of service in case provisions of Section 25 F are not complied . In the instant case no compensation has been paid to the workman.

It has not been specifically denied by the management anywhere that the workman has not worked on the Vehicles referred to above . The SDE has twice sent letters to the AGM (Estt . ) recommending regularization of the workman. Thus , it is fully established that the workman has worked for 240 days in each year of his employment . He has served the management from 1-3-1997 10 10-5-2003 as Driver and he has worked 240 days in each of the years of his employment .

This issue is decided accordingly.

ISSUE NO.2

In case a workman has worked for 240 days in a year and the work is of continuous and regular nature he should be paid retrenchment compensation . In case retrenchment compensation is not paid section 25F of the ID Act is attracted. There is no cessation of his service He is deemed continued in service in the eye of law. In case there is breach of Section 25F the service is continued and reinstatement follows as a natural consequence.

It was submitted from the side of the management that there is no relationship of employer-employee . The SDE has written several letters to AGM (Estt. ) for regularization of this workman. These letters sufficiently proves that the workman worked under the control and supervision of the management and he was only Driver 10 drive the vehicles . There is relationship of employer and employee between the management and the workman.

This issue is decided accordingly.

ISSUE NO.3

It was submitted from the side of the bank that reinstatement is not the only relief in all the cases of illegal termination , Section 11 A of the ID Act, 1947 provides for payment of compensation also.

ID Act , 1947 has been enactedto safeguard the interest of the workmen belonging to poor segment of society. It appears that legislature wanted that such workmen should not be harassed un- necessarily so Section 25 F, U, T and Clause 10 of Vth Schedute have boon enacted. The objects and reasons of ID Act , 1947 show that the respondent management should not be permitted to indulge in any unfair labour practice . The workmen should not be engaged for years and then they should be removed all of a sudden . There is provision of retrenchment compensation for his removal . Retrenchment compensation is for compensating him otherwise so that he can survive long interregnum of unemployment . In the instant case no retrenchment compensation has been paid.

It was submitted from the side ofthe workman that compensation is payable in cases where an undertaking has become sick or it has been closed or it is in economic loss. It has not been established that the bank is in economic loss and it is a sick Industry.

Itwas submitted from the side of the management that the Hon'ble Apex Court if 2006 ( 4) Scale has put down a complete ban on regularization and reinstatement. The Hon'ble Apex Court has held that employment can only be made on the basis of procedure established in that behalf envisaged by the Constitution . Equality of opportunity is the hallmark and the Constitution enshrines affirmative action to ensure that unequals are not treated equals. So public employment should be in terms of constitutional scheme .

My attention was drawn by the Ld. Counsel of the workman to 2000 LLR 523 State of UP and Rajender Singh. The Hon'ble Apex Court ordered for reinstatement with full back wages as the services ofthe daily wager cleaner who worked for 4 years was dispensed with without following the procedure for retrenchment, In the instant case also np retrenchment compensation has been paid . This case law squarely covers the instant case.

11was further submitted that the Constitution Bench Judgment has afforded a right according to which the government is not precluded from making temporary appointments or engaging workers on daily wages.

It has been held in 1978 Lab IC 1668 that in case service of a workman is terminated illegally the normal rule is to reinstate him with full back wages .

The Hon'ble Apex Court has not declared the provisions of ID Act un- constitutional . The Government [ भाग - खंड 3(ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19, 2008 /चैन्न 30, 1930

1865

In case the workman is reinstated with back wages the respondents have every right, after payament ofback wages and reinstatement, to retrench him yalidly following the principle of first come last go so that Sections 25 G & H of the ID Act are not violated, has got no licence to make always appointment ofdaily wagers and to continue them for lifetime . Fixed term temure appointments and temporary appointments cannot bethe rule ofpublic employment . Ai the time of making temporary appointments Articles 14, 16, 21 , 23 , 226 & 309 are infringed. There is no constitutional mandate that the government is at liberty to go on giving fixed term appointments for the entire tenure of service of an employee.

In the instant case it has been held while deciding issue no. 1 that the workman has worked continuously from 1-3-1997 to 10-5-2003 as a Driver under the management . It is not the case of the management that the work is not existing . The workman has worked for 7 years continuously and he has discharged 240 days dérties in every year of his employment . He has not been paid retrenchment compensation and one month's pay inlieu ofnotice. Thework is still existing as it has been nowhere stated by the management that the management does not own any Car or Jeep, Where the work is existing feinstatement is the only remedy to undo the illegal termination of the workman by the management. In the instant case the workman is entitled to reinstatement.

This issue is decided accordingly.

ISSUE NO . 4

It was submitted by the management that payrhent offullback wages is not the natural consequence of the order of discharge or dismissal being set aside. It:has been held in (2003 ) 6 SCC 141 that it is incumbent upon the labour court to decide the quantum of back wages.

No such Article ofthe Constitution has been pointed out under which the Government or Public Sector units cancontinue incessantly to give temporary and fixed term appointments again and again. Since fixed term appointments and temporary appointments are not governed by any constitutional scheme , such discrimination will amount to vicious discretion . The Government ofPublic Sector unit will go on resortingto the method ofpick and choose policy and give temporary and ad hoc appointments to their favorites and thus the principles of equality enshrined in the Constitution will begiven a go-bye . Such is not the intent of the Hon'ble Apex Court. However, in this judgement the provisions. ofthe ID Act governing the services of the workman have not been declared unconstitutional Reinstatement is the remedy provided in the ID Act for breach of several provisions enumerated therein or for breach of service rules provided in various labour welfare legislations.

Ithas been further held in this case that payment ofback wages having discretionary element involved it is to be dealt with the facts and circumstances of the case. No definite formula can be evolved.

It has been further held in this case that payment of back wages in its entirety is the statutory sanction. In (2003 ) 4 SCC 27 the Hon'ble Apex Court held that in view of delay in raising the dispute and initiating the proceedings back, wages need not be allowed, In the instant case there is no delay at least on the part of the workman in raising the dispute.

Section 11 A of the ID Act stipulaters that in case the Tribunal is satisfied that the order of discharge or dismissal was not justified, it may, by its award, set aside the order of discharge or dismissal and direct reinstatement of the workman on such terms and conditions, ifany, as it thinks fit or give such other relief to the workman including the award of any lesser punishment in lieu of discharge or dismissal as the circumstance of the case may require . According to this benign provision this Tribunal has the authority to set aside the order of discharge or dismissal and reinstate the workman on the terms and conditions as it thinks fit.

Athree Judges bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court has held in 1993 - II-LLJ that termination of services affects the livelihood of not only of the employeebut also of the dependents. So in case of illegal termination of service the workman should be reinstated.

In 1978 Lab IC 1968-three Judges Bench of the Hon'bleApex Court held that payment of full back wages is the normal rule. In case services have been illegally terminated either by dismissal or discharge, ór retrenchment , in such circumstance the workman is entitled to full back wages except to the extent he was gainfully employed during the enforced idleness . In the instant case the workman was always ready to work but he was not permitted on account of invalid act of the employer.

Reinstatement should not be misconceived as regularization. By the order of reinstatement the status quo ante of the workman is restored. He is given back wages in order to compensate him for his illegal disengagement. This is a special remedy provided in ID Act and it has not been annulled and set aside by any judgement of the Hon'ble Apex Court. The provisions of the ID Act are still constitutional and they are to be given effect to.

In 2005 IV AD SC 39-three Judges Bench ofthe Hon'bleApex Court held that reinstatement with fullback wages is justified. In this case the workman has perfonbed more than 240 days work and he has been retrenched without payment of compensation and pay in lieu of notice.

1866

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19 , 2008/ CHAITRA 30, 1930

with 25% back wages within two months from the date ofthe publication of the award.

The award is given accordingly.

Date: 20-3-2008

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 27 मार्च , 2008

11 was submitted from the side of the management hat reinstatement is not the only remedy. ' In such cases the workman may be given compensation , Section 11A of the ID Act , 1947 provides that in case of dismissal or discharge is found illegal reinstatement should be ordered. It has been held in a catena of cases by the Hon'ble Apex Court that reinstatement with full back wages is the normal rule The statute provides for reinstatemem . In certain exceptional cases where the undertaking has been closed down or it has become sick there may be order for paynment of compensation .

का. आ. 871 ,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूरसंचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरणः श्रम न्यायालय , नं.- II , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 1219/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-3-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

The workman is a Driver. It cannot be presumed that he is sitting all along without doing any duty. He is . a skilled workman he must be doing some sort of work though he has not been cruployed in any establishment . In. the circumstances he is entitled to 25% back wages.

This issue is decided accordingly.

[ सं . एल -40012 /51 / 2005 - आई आर ( डीयू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी ISSUE NO.5

New Delhi, the 27th March, 2008 It was submitted from the side of the management that the provisions of ID Act , 1947 are not applicable so far as the management is concerned . BSNL is an undertaking of the Central Government . Systematic activities are carried on in BSNL. The provisions of ID Act , 1947 arc applicable in the case of management .

S.O. 871.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1219/ 2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court No II , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Departinent ofTelecom and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 27-3-2008 .

[No. L-40012/51 / 2005 - JR (DU ) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

It was further submitted that the workman has moved the Hon'ble CAT and the Hon'ble High Court of Vitranchal and he has got no relief, so the case of the workman is barred by principles of res judicata. It is settled law that in ID cases , the principles of res judicata are tiot applicable The Hon'ble High Court of Uttranchal has directed for his regularization .

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - II,

SECTOR 18 -A, CHANDIGARH

PRESENT :

Shri Kuldip Singh, Presiding Officer

Case I.D. No. 1219/2K5 Registered on : 29-11-2005 Date ofDecision : 14-3-2008

The Central Government Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction to decide the case of the workman working in the Industries under the control of the Central Government . BSNL is run under the authority of the Central Government . It is an Industry . The Hon 'ble High Court of Uttranchal has directed the management to consider his case of regularization . There is no direction for reinstatement . The management may not have found the case ofthe workman fit for regularization but in view of Section 25 -F of the ID Act , 1947 the workman is eligible to raise this industrial dispute and the Court has jurisdiction to decide this reference.

Roop Lal Sío Shri Sant Ram Rio Kaziana, Tehsil Kalka, Panchkula (Haryana) ... Petitoner This issue is decided accordingly.

lerstis

The reference is replied thus :

The. Sub-Division Engineer . Telephone. Kalka . Panchkula (Haryana ) ...Respondent

APPEARANCE

For the Workman : Messrs . Sanjeev Sharma and Gian Chand Goel , Advocates .

The workman Shri Satya Prakash Sharma was employed continuously w.e.f. 1-3-1997 to 10-5-2003 as a Driver in Bharat Sanchar Nigam ( CMTS) under Chief General Manager, BSNL , Meerut . His termination/ disengagement from the service without any notice and compensation is neither legal nor justified . The management is directed to reinstate the workman along

For the Managcinent: Nemo .

1867 [भाग -खंड (ii) ]

भारत का रामपत्र अप्रैल 19, 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

KWARD

Thefollowing reference was received fromMinistry ofLabour, Government of India for adjudication vide their order No. L -40012/51 /2005 - IR (DU) dated 261k of October, 2005:

"Whether the action of the Management ofSub- Divisional Engineer, Kalka , District, Panchkula, in terminating the services of Shti Roop Lai 8/0 Shri Sant Ram , Ex-forty Driver, wef. 1-7-94 without any notice and payment of retrenchment competention is illegal and unjustified ? If so 10 what boliof the concurned workman is entitled to and from which date ?"

Thenoticeofthe reference was given to the Parties The workman appeared alongwith his representative whereas despite repeated notices the Management did not a appear . Finally a notice tinder registered cover was issued to the Management vide postal teceipt No. 678 dated 4-9-2006 . The Management siill did not appear despite expiry of statutory period of thirty days nor the registered cover carrying the notice was received back un-served. The Tribunal still waited for theManagement for aweek, but no body turned up for thein , rather till date theyhave not appeared. It was in these circulislarices that the Management was put ex parte on 12-10-2006. The Tribunal again sent notice to the Managerment vinder registered cuver postal receipt No. 314 on 6-12-2006 Informing them that they have been put ex parte. Still the Management did not appear and their cast is not befure thisTribunal . in support ofhis claim the workman has filedhis affidavit. He has also appeared as witness. He has filed written argument and his counsel also addressed arguments supporting his case.

Int support of his claim the workmen has sworn in an affidavit WW1 . He has also placed on record documents showing the working days he served the Management and exhibited as wwi/l. WW 1/2. The workman has re-iterated the facts given in his statement of claim by his affidavit . The combine reading of affiskavit ofthe workitian WW1 , documents WW1 / land WW1/2 together with the stafetunt of workman recorded in the Tribunal lerve on rooit to doubt that the workmedkone has served theManagement from 21st ofMay, 1992 to 1st of July, 1994. There appear some variations in the docalmente WW1/1 and WW1 /2 which are issued by the officers of the Margement. The Management has πιο come forward to rebut the clains of the workman or to admit or deny the contents of these documents . However, thewordomen in his statement, recorded in the Tribunal, Adinitted that at the time of his engagement , the post on which he was sngaged was not notified. He claimed that he was summoned by the $00 who had checked his driving and engaged him; that he was the alone person calledfor interview and ongaged. This shows that the initist engagement of the workman was not done after an open compctition . The fact however remains that the workman had served the Managensent for 240 days in a year, ifnot immediately, in the year next before the year of termination of his services. It has not also come on fecerd thatbefore terminating his services the Management had given notice to the workanan or paid retrenchment compensation. There is also no evidence on record to show that the Management had jaformed the appropriate government about the proposed. teritination of services of the workman . Thus the termination of services of the workman was in clear violation of Section 25- ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; hence the same is quashed. He is treated to be in service as if there was no order of termination of his services.

Theclaim oftheworkman is that he was appointed as driver on daily wages on 21st of May, 1992 but was relieved on 1st of July, 1994 although his service record was satisfactory. At the time of relieving the SDE had told the workman that he will be given the sante job after some time . The workman attended the office of SDE Kalka and the office of G.M. Telephone, Ambala. He was called forjob alongwith other candidates in the year 1995 among whom the workman was the senior and only experienced driver, but one Bachu Lal , who was working as class IV trelper with CGM, Telephone, Ambala, was appoirited . In response to the demand notice raised by the workman, the Management appeared but did not agree 10 conciliation initiated by the A.L.C. ( C) Chandigarh; hente the reference . The claim of the workman further is that since he had performed his duty sincerely and honestly and was an experienced driver, therefore, he deserved to be given the job of the driver. He has prayed for a direction to the Management to appoint him as driver.

Now the question that arises for consideration is as to what relief the workman is entitled to and from. whichdate. It has been noticed above that the engagement ofthe workman was not after following the due procedure inaccordance with rules and after an open competition. In view ofthe law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and Ors . Versus Umadevi reported as (2006 ) 4 SCC 1 , he cannot be re-instated on the post he had worked even if the said post is_available. He is however, entitled to the compensation as he had served the Management for more 240 days. Considering the length of service rendered by the workman, the suffering he has undergone during this period incontesting his case and maintaining bis family It cannot be accepted that he has remained without work all through this period, otherwise how he could meet hit household expenses . Considering the facts and circumstances I am of the opinion that the ends ofjustice 1284G1/2008-8 1868

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA APRIL 19 , 2008 /CHAITRA 30, 1930 [PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

StateBank of India,

Region IV, Zonal Office,

Bhopal

Management

AWARD

Passed on this 19th day of February, 2008 demand that the workman should be paid a compensation of rupees one lac for illegally terminating his services and I order accrodingly. The Management is directedto pay this compensation to the workman within three midhths from the date they receive the copy of the award. In case of their failure to do it, the workman shall be entitled to interest on the awarded amount @ 9% from 12-10-2006 , the day were put ex parte. Therefore is answered in these terms.

I. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L- 12012/247 /95 -I.R. ( B-1 ) dated 4-3-97 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :-

Let a copy of this award be sent to the appropriate govenument for necessary action and the file be consigned to records after due completion .

KULDIP SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 27 मार्च , 2008

"Whether the action of the management of Asstt . General Manager, State Bank of India , Region - IV, Zonal Office, Bhopal (M.P. ) instead of regularising Shri Dinesh Sharma when he has already completed continuous service for the total period 1220 days between 1978 to 1994 and then kept him as a temporary casual staff in the interrupted interval for a long period from 17-3-88 and then suddenly on verbal instructions stopping him from his duty without complying with the prescribed procedure is justified and legal ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

का. आ. 872.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 59/1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-03-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[ सं. एल-12012/247/ 1995- आई आर ( ची- [ ) ] अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

2. Vide order dated 14-12-07 passed on the ordersheet of this' reference proceeding , the reference proceeded ex parte against the workman/Union . In spite of sufficient service of notice on the workman/Union, πο statement of claim has been filed.

New Delhi . the 27th March, 2008

3. The management also failed to file the Written Statement .

4.On the date fixed for argument , no body appeared for the parties and in this manner, the reference was closed for-award.

S.O. 872.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 59/ 1997) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cuun - Labour Court . Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of State Bank of India and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 27-03-2008.

5. It is a case of no pleadings and no evidence. Therefore the reference deserves to be decided in favour of the management and against the workman/Union without any orders as to costs .

[No. 1-12012/247/ 1995- IR (B- 1) ] AJAY KUMAR. Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT/ LC /R/59/ 97

ㅏ :

Shri C. M. Singh , Presiding Officer

The General Secretary .

State Bank of India Workman Union ,

Bhopal Circle.

6. In view of the above , the reference is decided in favour of the management and against the workman/ Union without any orders as to costs holding that the action of the management of Asstt. General Manager. State Bank of India, Region - IV, Zonal Office , Bhopal (M.P. ) instead of regularising Shri Dinesh Sharma when he has already completed continuous service for the total period 1220 days between 1978 to 1994 and then kept him as a temporary casual staff in the interrupted interval for a long period from 17-3-88 and then suddently on verbal instructions stopping him from his duty without complying with the prescribed procedure is justified and legal. Consequently the workman is not entitled to any relief.

Chhindwara Branch .

Workman/Union

PO Distt . Chhindwara (MP)

Tersus

7. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour and Employment as per rules .

The Astt . General Manager .

C. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer 1869 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19, 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

[ भाग - खंड (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली: 27 मार्च, 2008

का. अप. 173 , औधोगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14.) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केंद्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफा ट्राक्नक्रोर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार मौद्योगिक अधिकरण, इस्माकूलास के मंचाव ( संदर्भ संख्या 328/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27-03-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।....

[सं. एल-12012/116/2002 -आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi, the 27th March, 2008

S.O. 873. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Apt , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Cemral Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 328/ 2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- curn-Labour Court , Ernakulam as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the inanagersent of StateBank ofTravancore , and their workmen , whichwas received by the Central Government on 27-03-2008 .

[No. L-12012/ 116/2002- IR (B -I) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM

PRESENT1

Shri P. 1, Norbert , Presiding Officer, B.A. , LL.B.

LD. 328/2006

(I.D. 14/2002 of Labour Court, Ernakulam)

Workman

Smt. T. M. Jayasree,

"TheNest",

: Pandakkal Road, Pattambi,

Palakkad District

sometime. On health reasons she got a posting in despatch section of the same branch after sometime. While so on 20-10-1998 the Clerk of Savings Bank Section was late to arrive and the worker was asked by her superior officer to attend to Savings Bank Section until the concerned clerk arrived . Accordingly the worker attended the Section at 10 a.m. According to the worker while in S.B. Section one Smt . K. P. Rukkiya approached her with awithdrawal form for Rs . 50,000. As there was no pass book with the customer the withdrawal form was referred 10 concerned officer who authenticated the withdrawal . Theworker then posted the withdrawal in the SB ledger and forwarded it to the concerned officer for passing the instrument. Meanwhile the SB Clerk arrived and the worker returned to her seat in the despatch section. The.. worker was not aware of the subsequent developments. On 24-08-2000 the worker received a memo saspending her from service. Thereafter a chargeshert dited 22-09- 2000 was issued to her. The allegation was that the worker had fraudulently withdrawn the money of the customer and misappropriated the same and destroyed the evidence by removing the voucher. The worker submitted preply. denying the charges. But the management conducted an enquiry. According to the worker the enquiry was conducted violating the principles of natural justice, Documents called for were not produced by the management . Important questions in the cIOSST examination of management witnesses were disallowed by the EnquiryOfficer. There is no legal evidence to prove the charges . The worker has put in, 22 years of unblemished service. Her work was appreciated by the management Disciplinary proceedings against theworker is an act of victimization and an unfair labour practice. Similar officers who dealt with the transaction under dispute were spared by the management . The worker is the mother of two school going daughters . Her aged mother is staying with her. She has no other source of income, The worker is innocent.

By Adv. Sri AshokB. Shenoy

: TheAssistantGeneral Manager

Management

StateBank of Travancore, IV Disciplinary Authority,

Calicu-4

ByAdv. Sri Saji Varghese

This case coming up for hearing on 14-11-2007. this Tribunal-cum- Labour Court on 16-11-2007 passed the following.

AWARD

This is a reference made under Section 10 ( 1 )( d ) of Industrial Disputes Act for adjudicating the correctness of the action of management in dismissing the worker from service..

2. Facts of the case in brief are as follows:-

3. According to the management worker had committed fraud and misappropriated Rs. 50,000 from the account of a customer of the bank of Pattambi Branch The enquiry was conductedby complying with the principles ofnatural justice and giving full opportunity to the worker. Both sides adduced evidence, The management witnesses were cross-examined by the defence.Based on the evidence on record the Enquiry Officer came to the conclusion that the worker was guilty of the charges. A copy of the report was given to the worker and she was heard by the Disciplinary Authority before punishment ofdischarge was imposed. Appeal filad bythe worker was heard and dismissed. The misconduct committed by the worker is very grave in nature. There is no basis for the allegation that real culprits are left scot free. The findings are based on evidence and in the matter ofpunishment a lenient view was in fact taken by the Disciplinary Authority by imposing the punishment Shri T. M. Jayasree was working as Teller in Pattambi Branch of State Bank of Travancore for 1870

PART I-SBC. 3 ( її) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19 , 2008/CHAITRA 30 , 1930

of discharge instead of dismissal . The worker is net entitled for any relief.

4. in the light of the above pleadings the following points arise for consideration:--

1.Are the findings sustainable ?

2. Is the punishmсти горег ?

3. Regarding Retiefs.

The evidence consists ofExt..M1 Enquiry file alone.

5. Point No. : it is an admitted fact that the worker Smt. T. M. Jayasree wous working in Pattambi Branch of StateBank ofTravancore on 20-10-1998 when the alleged incident occurred, that she was posted in the dispatch section and that ske had acted as SB clerk on 20-10- 1998 for some time and that she had posted withdrawal of Rs . 50,000 in the Savings Bank ledger concerning Smt . K. P. Rukkiya on 20-10-1998.

6. The allegation against the worker is that with the fraudulent intention of withdrawing money of a customer the worker had posted withdrawal ofRs . 50,000 in the Savings Bank ledger and received money from the cashier and misappropriated the same . The worker denies and contends that she had only helped the SB Clerk in latter's absence by attending the customers ofSB counter. The withdrawal was authenticated by the concerned officer. The money was not received by her. Much before that the concerned SB Clerk had arrived and she had not further dealtwith the transaction in question.

7. Exts. PEX-2, 10, 11 and 12 of Ext. Ml prove withdrawal of Rs . 50,000 from the SB Account No. 7049 of Snu. K. P. Rukkiya on 20-10-1998. Exts. PEX-2 is ledger sheet concerned (page 9 ), PEX- 10 is cash scroll of Special Assistant (Pg -26) , PEX- 11 is cash payment Register (Pg-30 ) and Ext . PEX- 12 is Savings Bank Subsidiary Register ( page 36) . Smt . Rukkiya came forward and said that she had not been to the bank on 20-10-1998 for withdrawing any amount, much less Rs.50,000 . According to her she had kept the amount in bank for the purpose of her daughter's marriage. At the time ofthe incident her eldest daughter was doing degree course, second year. Ext . PEX-3 is copy of her pass book. It shows that she used to withdraw money only at long intervals and the quantum was not exceeding Rs . 5,000, The last withdrawal was on 17-04-1996. Thereafter for more than 2 years there was no withdrawal. She had no cheque facility. She always used withdrawal form to withdraw money. It is in the background of this statement of Smı . K. P. Rukkiya (PW6 , page 127 of Ext. Ml ) that the version of the worker is to be assessed.

Book. Hence the worker referred the withdrawal to the concerned officer who authenticated the withdrawal by initialling the withdrawal in the SB ledger and issued token to the party. Then the ledger with the withdrawal form were referred to the concerned officer for passing the instrument. It is relevant to note that the worker is definite that the customer Smt . K. P. Rukkiya had approached her. She also remembers that the customer had not brought pass book, but had submitted only a signed withdrawal form for withdrawing Rs . 50,000 from her account. This transaction and its discrepancy in the account of the customer cafae to the notice of the management only in July 2000 while verifying the account of another customer Shri P. Abdul Gafoor who had complained that he had not withdrawn Rs . 30,000 on 27-02-1999 from his account . That means in the case of Smt . K. P. Rukkiya the aleged withdrawal was detected 1 year 9 months after the ancident of withdrawal , Even at this distance of lime the worker could remember that the customer Sint , Rukkiy had approached her on 20-10-1998 with a signed wisdrawal form and without pass book . She may be used for remembering the customer and the transaction pecause she had attended only one customer on 20-10-1548 . But is that the truth ? The pass book ( PEX- 3 , tws that even the last withdrawal admitted by customer was made by producing passbook. According to Smt . Rukkiya she had never withdrawn money without bringing pass book. The money she deposited on different dates is the compensation she received on account of the death of her husband who was working abroad. This is evident from her complaint to the bank, Ext . PEX-4 ( page- 14 ) that while giving evidence before enquiry officer she had stated that she had saved the money for the purpose of marriage of her daughters who were studying and had not yet fledged. The pass book shows that the withdrawals were at long intervals and the amount withdrawn never exceeded Rs. 5,000. The customer had no special needto withdraw a large sum of Rs. 50,000 on 20-10-1998 . The total amount in her account as on 20-10-1998 was only Rs. 54,902 (PEX-2 page - 9) . Therefore unless there was urgent need there was no occasion for withdrawing such a large sum, by an ordinary housewife who has no other source of income other than the earnings of her husband. In the circumstances there is no reason to discredit the testimony of PW6 , Smt. Rukkiya that she had not withdrawn the money. A poor lady and a widow, with ordinary family background and social circumstances would not dare to lie as she does not stand to gain by telling that she has not withdrawn the money. She has no motive to implicate the worker. During cross examination of Smt. Rukkiya no question was put by the worker suggestive of her need for money on 20-10-1998 . The worker has not been able to show what is the motive for the Manager or Deputy Manager or any other Officer 8. Ext . PEX- 5 (page 15 ) is her reply to the memo of charges . Her case is that Smt . K. P. Rukkiya had approached her with a withdrawal form signed by her for withdrawing Rs . 50,000 from her SB Account No. PB-7049/63 and that the customer had come withoutPass of the bank to accuse her. No such instance is pointed 1871 [भाग - खंड ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19, 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

to commute between Thrissur and Pattaribi of Palakkad District everyday. She adunits that the distance is 48 kuj and sometimes she was late to arrive. In such sittiations: some other staff used to attend SB Section. At any rate Attendance Register Ext . PEX - 8 does ' nơi show thu somebody was late on 20-10-1998 . Hotever the possibility ofPW- 9 reaching late on thatday cannot b ruled out especially when Deputy Manger PW- 3 says that he does not remember whether he had asked the worker to attend SB counter. But the only work that was done by the delinquent was that she had posted the withdrawal d Rs .50,000 in the concerned SB- ledger and referred it for authentication of PW3 . After it was anthenticated she issued token. Nothing more was done by ber. Ther paymentwas scrolled by Special Assistant PW- 4- endcash was paidby PW-5 Cashier. The Deputy Manager PW- 1 says that the withdrawal form was not brought to bint and he has not initialed or authorized payment. The withdrawal form is missing from the record roum of the bank and there is no way to verify either the initial PW-3 , if any or the signature of the customer in the withdrawal forin . It is in evidence that dere was heavy rush in the SB Section on 20-10-1998 . Yet the workst attended to only one withdrawal before the arrival of concerned SB Clerk. While the withdrawal form wak referred for authorisation of the Deputy Manager andby the time it returned the worker could have attomed 1 other customers in the SB counter. Strangely enough sht waited for the authorisation and on receipt , issued tokes and forwarded the SB ledger and withdrawal foma to the Special Assistant. A person who attends a cotultoravherk there is heavy rush cannot sit idle until the processing of one transaction is complete. This is yet another circumstances going against the worker.

out . Hesice the management has no reason to compel the customer to lie against the worker nor is the customer (a poor house wife) capable of understanding such sinister motive, ifany, of the management and dance according to the tune of the officers . The management proceeded against the worker as she was the person who had first attended the withdrawal transaction on 20-10-1998 and according to the management none had connived with the worker in the incident. It is the definite case of management that Smt . Rukkiya had not come to bank andwithdrawn the money. Whereas the worker is certain that Smi , Rukkiya had approached her. This version of the worker-can in no way be true in the light of the circumstances aforementioned . The statement of the worker in Ext . PEX- 5 (page 15) cannot be taken as a casual statertient, as it is repeated in the claim statement and no deviation is made . The contention of the worker that complaint from Sot , Rukkiya was obtained by management subsequently with a view to trap ber, has no basis because the detection of the incident was not at the instance of Smt . Rukkiva . She came to know of the incident only from the management . But she had tomake a formal request to the bank to put the money illegally taken away, back in her account. So far as bank is concerned such a request from the account holder was also necessary for proceeding with the enquiry . Smt. Rukkiya had not suspected anyone or suggested as to what could have happened on 20-10-1998 . Ext . P4 request was that on 20-10-1998 she had not withdrawn ans amount from her account and hence the shortage in. the deposit may be made good . Her request (complaint) will not help the management to incriminate anyone. Therefore there is no merit in the contention of the worker that the management was tryingto inake out a case against her by getting a complaint from the customer.

10. The payment was made out of turn. It is an admitted fact that in the 1st page of cash scroll of 20-10-1998 token No. 192 is noted at the top, though i thephotostat copyExt. PEX- 10 that writing isnot seen It is the token issued to the account holder SB Account No. 7049 (Rukkiya ). The Cashier ofthai day Smt. K. S Mini admits that fact . According to ber the purpose of noting token inumber at the top ofcash scroll is for intelkin payment out ofturn . She explains that out oftorn paymen is made in case of emergency and to VIP. customers, But for V.I.P. customers no token is normally issued, but vouchers are presented either by Manager or staf Smi . Rukkiya is not a V.I.P. customer. What was the urgency to pay the amount out ofturn is also not known This is more relevant as Sint . Bukkiva bad not been to bank

11. Ext. PEX-8 is Attendance Register, relevan page. Serial No. 15 is worker. Oni 20-10-1998 she wa present . Attendance is marked both in the morning af well as in the evening. The initial of worker at the time 9.The Enquiry Officer has found that the Ist charge that-the worker had posted withdrawal in the SB ledger with the intention of committing frand stands proved . I have already mentioned that the worker admits that she hadposted the withdrawal in the SB ledger. The disputed part of the charge' is regarding intention to commit fraud. The intention can be gathered only from the circumstances . The prime circumstance is that Smt. Rukkiya, the account holder or anybody authorized by her, had not approached the bank for withdrawal of money on 20-10-1998. But according to the worker, Smt . Rukkiya had approached her. This case of the worker is totally untrue. The next circumstance is that the first and the only transaction that the worker attended in SB counter on 20-10-1998 was that of the customer, Smt . Rukkiya. It has come out in evidence that there were two clerks in the SB section at the relevant time . The worker was. in the despatch section. The SB Clerks are PW-9 Ms. Silaja V. and PW- 11 Ms. Vijayakumari . PW -9 belongs to Ponkimnam of Thrissur District and she used 1872

[PART II-SEC, 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19, 2008/ CHAITRA 30, 1930

There is no evidence regarding receipt of money by the worker as rightly pointed out by Enquiry Officer.

15. The next allegation is that the worker had removed voucher with a view to destroy the evidence against her. Voucher is missing from the record room admittedly. The management has not been able to find out as to how it had happened and who is the culprit . There is a record - keeper in the bank and he is DW1 in Ext . M1 , K. Mohanan. Vouchers and other records are kept in the stationery room . He admits that a bunch of vouchers including the disputed voucher is missing . During working hours the stationery room is open and staff have access . For balancing work of SB ledger different staff take out vouchers for verification . There is a suggestion by the management that balancing work of SB-ledger No. 63 was allotted to worker and she might have removed the voucher in question. But it is found by the Enquiry Officer that the balancing work was done by theworker one year after the incident and there is no convincing evidence against the worker.

16. The customer had suffered a loss of Rs . 50,000 as the amount was withdrawn without her knowledge from her account and the bank is accountable to her. To that extent bank has suffered loss .

of departure on 20-10-1998 is different from the initials at the time of arrival on that day and on subsequent days i.e. 21-10-1998 to 28-10-1998. The Enquiry Officer finds that the worker had a disturbed mind due to guilty conscience and so she could not even put her initial properly. The findings is not without basis. As pointed out the initial of worker on all other days are similar except that of the afternoon of 20-10-1998 . The worker's explanation is that the first part of her initial is blurring and that is the reason why it appears to be different from other initials . But a close look at the initial will show that her version is not true. In the disputed initial she has put the initial in such a way that there is no space within the column of the Attendance Register 10 accommodate the alleged blurring ' head ' of the initial . Her full initial is there in Ext . P8 on 20-10-1998 Α.Ν. and no portion is blurred. This initial of 20-10-1998 A.N. is similar to the initial of Dy . Manager Shri Parameswaran ( PW3 ) who was the officer to authorise withdrawal by putting his initial in the withdrawal form. Therefore management contends that the worker had forget the initial of Deputy Manager in the withdrawal form and straight away sent it to scrolling clerk. Withdrawalform is missing and so it is not possible to verify the truth . Coupled with this , in Ext. PEX -2 SB ledger sheet in the column of withdrawal when balance was struck she bungled and wrote figure 4992 ' instead of 4902 and then corrected. In the next column underneath she wrote the correct figure * 4922 ' and initialled. This again depicts the perturbed state of mind ofthe worker.

12. Another instance is that on the same day the worker had withdrawn Rs . 20,000 from her account . On the next day the same amount was deposited. Ext . PEX- 16 . SB Ledger sheet of the account of worker ( Smt. T. M. Jayasree ) confirms this fact. Her explanation is that she had given this amount to Shri P. T. Velayudhan , Peon for remitting it in the loan account of Velayudhan in Co- operative Society. But on the next day Shri Velayudhan returned the money saying that it was not required . The said Velayudhan is not a witness on the side ofthe worker. If her case were genuine she could have examined him.

13. All the above circumstances lead to the irresistible conclusion that the worker had the intention to commit fraud .

17. The Enquiry Officer has found that the 1st charge isproved, 2nd charge is partly proved and the third charge is not proved. It is contended by the learned counsel for the worker that , since there is no evidence to show that the worker had received the money from the cashier or removed voucher, the allegation of misappropriation of money has no basis. The argument is not sound . The transaction was initiated by the worker and I have found that she had the intention to commit fraud with a view to appropriate the money to herself. Since Smu . Rukkiya had not approached bank or sent anyone to withdraw money the very withdrawal form must have been forged by the worker. If the initial steps were taken by her the remaining part of the procedure is atuomatic. It has not come out in evidence that there is any connivance of any other staff in the transaction. The money is withdrawn from the account at any rate. Once frand is committed with the intention of misappropriating money and as per the account moncy is debited it matters little whether the money was received by the worker from the cashier. To prove misappropriation it is not necessary to show that money was received directly by the worker from the cashier. Once interition to misappropriate moncy is proved, proof of actual receipt of money is not essential and a presumption can be drawn that she has enjoyed the booty. It is an act prejudicial to the interest of the bank falling within clause 19.5 (j ) of Ist Bipartite Settlement . The contention of the learned counsel for the worker. that if at all the worker is found to have committed misconduct , it amounts to only negligence falling either 14. The next allegation is that the worker had produced token and received cash from the cashier. But Cashier ( PWS ) does not remember whether the amount was paid to the worker or not . She says that the worker has not received such amounts of customers at any time from her. She can only say that the person who held the token was given the amount. The cashier had no particular reason to remember the particular payment .

[ भाग 1 ]-खंड 3 (ii) ]

1813 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19, 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

ander clause 19.5 ( d)or 2nd part of (j ) of the settlement, is not acceptable. The intention to commit fraud is writ large and squarely falls within 1st part of sub-clause (j ) of clause 19.5 Lack of evidence regarding removal of voucher by the worker cannot lessen the seriousness of the misconduct. I may also mention that since there is no serious attack on the procedural aspects of the enquiry, unless the findings are perverse adjudicating authority is not justified in deviating from the findings of Enquiry Officer: In other words if the findings are based on materials on record this court is not to go into the reasoning of the Enquiry Officer in reaching the findings . I have carefully considered the evidence on record and I And convincing circumstances and evidence is proof of the guilt of the worker. No interferetice in the findings of Enquiry Officer is called for.

21. Itwas then contended that period of suspension cannot be treated as one without wages.My atterition was drawn to clause 19.4 of the settlement. It speaks of prosecution in criminal trial and the effect of non prosecution în respect ofperiod of suspension. Thougha complaint was lodged with police regarding the incident they referred the matter after investigation. The relevalu portion ofclause 19.4 says that if the authority concerned come to the conclusion that there is no case for prosecution it shall be open to the management to proceed against the employée under clauses 19.11 and 19.12 relating to discharge, but he shall be deemed to have bean on duty during the period of suspension and shall be entitled to full wages and allowances and to all other privileges for such period. According to the management what is applicable in this case is clause 19,12 (b). The relevant portion, reads :

.........and ifsome punishment other than dismissal is inflicted the whole or a part of the period of suspension, may, at the discretion, of the management, be treated as on duty with the right to a corresponding portion of the wages , allowance etc.

18. Point No. 2 :-The punishment according to the learned counsel for the worker is improper. illegal andharsh. The punishment imposed is discharge ( subject 10 the sanction of the superannuation benefius by the competent authority ) without disqualification for future employment and recovery ofRs . 50,000 from theworker. According to the learned counsel for the worker discharge and recovery are double punishments and is against clause 19.9 of the settlement . It reads

"Aworkman found guilty of misconduct, whether gross or minor, shall not be given more than one punishment in respect of any one charge" .

But the provision relates to a case other than dismissal . The punishment here is ' discharge ' which is a milder form of punishment than dismissal. Even as per clause 19.12(6) huspension period is to be treated as on duty. Superannuation benefits are also granted to the worker. In the facts of this case the provision applicable is19.4 and the period of suspension is to be treated as on duty with the right to full wages and allowances and all other privileges for such period of suspension.

19. The learned counsel for the management on the other hand,' relying on the decision in Mahabal S. AminVs. Vijaya Bank 2003-1 - LLJ 394 at 397 para 14. contended that apart from imposing any of the major or minor penalties they can also recover the pecuniary loss caused to the bank . Para 14 reads :-

In the result, an award is passed finding that the action of the managment in imposing the punishment of discharge with superannuation benefits and recovery of an amount of Rs . 50,000 from Smt. T. M. Jayasree is legal and proper. However the period of suspension is to be treated as on duty with the right to full wages and allowances and all other privileges for such period of suspension. The parties will suffer their respective cost.

The award will come into force one month after its publication in the official gazette.

"We are in agreement with the view taken by the Kerala High Court to the extent that if an employee is found to be guilty of causing pecuniary loss to the bank then the disciplinary authority apart from imposing any of the major or minor penalties envisaged under Regulation 4 çan also direct for recovery of pectiniary' loss caused to the institution from delinquent. This is so even in common law, It requires no specific provision under the regulations for the purpose. This is more in the nature tobased ... on charge".

Typed, corrected and passed by me on this the 16thday ofNovember, 2007.

P. L. NORBERT, Presiding Office

Appendix

Nil

Exhibits for the workman

Exhibits for the Management EnquryFile.

20. In the light of the above observation the punishment imposed cannot be said tobe illegal . That apart considering the seriousness of the misconduct the penalty ofdischarge is no way disproportionate . The fact that the worker is the sole bread winner of her family consisting of two daughters and aged mother is no mitigating circunstance in case of misappropriation of money.

1874

[PART 11- SE , 3 ( ii ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA APRIL 19 , 2008/ CHAITRA 30, 1930

नई दिल्ली, 31 मार्च, 2008

January , 1993 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether the action of the management of Oriental Bank of Commerce in dismissing Shri Raj Pal fromı the services of the bank justified ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled to ?"

का. आ. 874.- औधोगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) को धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओरिएण्टल बैंकऑफ कॉमर्स के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय, नं. 2 , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 784/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-3-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -12012/275/92- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi . the 31st March, 2008

It is on record that the workinan did not put his appearance; and that the Tribunal presumed that he is left with no interest to pursue his claim , therefore, vide award dated 1-5-2003 the reference was dismissed and returnedto the Appropriate Govt . However, on a petition by the workinan . Hon'ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana vide their judgement dated 6-5-2005 set aside the said award and directed Tribunal to adjudicateupon the matter in accordance with law. The reference was5 receivedby this Tribunal , on transfer, on 6-9-2005. Hon'ble High Court further directed that the reference be disposed of within a period of one year and restricted the parties to adduce ( licir evidence in two opportunitics ench.

S.O. 874.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Reference No. 784/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court No. 2. Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Oriental Bank of Commerce and their workmen. which was received by the Central Government on 24-3-2008 ,

[No. L - 12012/275/92- IR (B - II ) ] RAJINDER KUMAR , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT- II , SECTOR 18- A, CHANDIGARH

Shri Kuldip Singh. Presiding Officer

Case L.D. No. 784/2005

Registered on-6-9-2005

The claim of the workman is that the managemeщ had terininated his services wrongly and with mala fide intentions on account of his trade union activities on 24-4-1992 . The management did not pay suspension allowarice to the workman. They also violated the provisions of Laws , therefore , the suspension and finally his dismissal was illegal . The management did not hold proper enquiry and also violated the principle of natural justice. He was not provided with the opportunity to represent his case through a co - worker/union member or a legal practitioner . He was beaten up by the manager of Fatehgarh Churian Branch alongwith the accountant and two other persons and had obtained his signatures on blank papers by undue influence . Therefore, bis dismissal from service is bad in law.

Date of Decision 7-3-2008

Raj Pal S/o Sain Dass Rio Harinagar, Pathankote Care of CITU Office, Gandhi Chowk, Pathankote.

...Petitioner

Versus

Assistant General Manager, Oriental Bank of Conumerce. Jalandhar City, Punjab ... Respondent

APPEARANCE :

: Mr. Sunil Kumar

For the Workman

Choudhary, Advocate

: Mr. Ram Chander .

For the Management

Advocate

AWARD

The management filed their written statement and denied the claim made by workman. According to them the workman had committed serious misconduct for which he was chargesheeted on 7th August. 1991. The workman voluntarily admitted the charges during the enquiry proceedings held on 10-9-1991 . Thereupon the disciplinary authority passed the punishment order against him on 24-4-1992 . They have claimed that the workman was paid subsistence allowance during the pendancy of the enquiry proceedings and his suspension . They have further claimed that while posted as clerk/ cashier in Fatehgarh Churian Branch the workman had committed a fraud of Rs . 1,93,500 as detailed in the charge sheet dated 7-8-1991 . He had also pocketed an amount of Rs . 44,000 deposited by the account holders. He deposited an amount of Rs . 45.000 on various dates and admitted his guilt before the enquiry officer on 10-9-1991 and then on 18-9-1991 . They denied the other assertions made by the workman and stated that the The Central Government Ministry of Labour vide Notification No. L- 12012/275/ 92- IR (B - II ) dated 27th

i 1875 [ भाग 11- खंड ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19, 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

as Ex . M3 . The workman also admitted the changes in his own handwriting. he denied that the representative ofthe management was well qualified and stated that he was only an officer of the bank. He further claimed that the workman had deposited the amount swindled by him: and that the workman had received list of witness and documents provided by the management . He farther denied that the enquiry held was not proper and fair.

proper and fair enquiry was conducted against the workman in terms of Bipartite Settlement and full opportunity was given to him to defend himself. Thus the order ofdismissal passed on the basis of enquiry report was legal and inconsonance with the Bipartite Settlement. The punishment awarded was also appropriate in view ofthe charges proved against him . It is further their claim that the workman had also committed similar misconduct . earlier which he admitted before the enquity officer. They denied that the workman ever requested for engaging a co-workers or a lawyer during the enquiry, As the workman had confessed his guilt, there was no question ofworkman engaging a defense representative or a lawyer during the enquiry. They denied other claims made by the workman as false and fabricated.

In support of their respective claims the workman appeared as awitness whereas the managentent examined Shri B. B. Malhotra as their witness. The workman in his statement, recorded on 18-9-1995 admitted that he was charge sheeted for having committed embezzlement of an amount of Rs . 800, and that he was awarded the punishment of stoppage of three annual increments as perEx. M1 . He further admitted that Shri B. B. Malhotra wasappointed as enquiry officer who had intimated him vide Ex, M2 that the enquiry shall be conducted in the branch office of the management at Amritsar on 10-9-1991. He further admitted that the enquiry was conducted on 10-9-1991 in his presence and that the writing on Ex. M3 and M4 is in his hand but claimed that the samewas written by him under duress . He denied that he had received the enquiry report dated 19-9-1991 but admitted that AD (acknowledgement due ) marked as C&D bears his signatures and by those documents enquiry report along with letters was sent to him. He further admitted to have received show cause notice Ex . Mó and M7, the telegram was sent by him. He further admitted that Ex . M8 and M9 were writtento him and admitted that M10 , the telegram was sent by him stating that he will appear before the management on 20-1-1992 . He further admitted to have received the order of his termination Ex. M12 and stated that he had deposited amount out his salary and suspension allowance and that Ex . M13 to M17 are the letters written by him bat claimed thatthose letters were got written by him under duress..

Ihave gone through the file and have considered the submissions made by the parties and their counsels. It is a case in which a domestic enquiry was held about the misconduct of the workman who was alleged to have swindled away an amount of Rs . 1,93,500 from the accounts of the customers of the management bank. On record I find Ex. M - 13 , Ex . M - 14, Ex. M- 15 , admitted by the workman to have been written by him, in his own handwriting. In his statement he only alleged that these letters were got written by him under duress but he has not produced any evidence to show as to who exercised that undue influence and for what purpose. He has also failed to produce any evidence to show that after these letters were got written by him under duress, he spoke about it to any ofhis relations, friends or made complaint about it to higher authorities of the management or of the State which could have proved his ustural conduct . He hasalso not produced any record to show that he had raised this claim before the appellate authority or even before the Hon'ble High Court where he had gone in writ petitionwhen the reference was decided against him. There's absolutely no evidence on record to support the clain ofthe workman made in para No. 6 of his claim petition. The manner he has made statement before this court further suggests that he is a man of slippery character and keeps shifting from his statements. In the beginning of cross -examination, he denied that he was ever chage-sheeted or any enquiry was held against him . But in the next moment he admitted that he was charge- sheeted for having embezzled Rs . 800 for which he was ! punished with the stoppage of three annual increments. On the one hand be denied that he had embezzled an amount ofRs . 93,500 but in the next moment he admitted to have executed letters Ex . M- 13 to M- 17 . He claimed that he had not received the suspension allowance but in the same breath he stated that he had deposited amount out of his salary and suspension alfowance . There are numerous other instances which show that he is a inan of shifting nature and changed his version from timeto time.

I have also gone through the enquiry proceedings along with the statement of the workman and find that the enquiry officer had conducted himself very fairly.He charge- sheeted the workman , provided him the list of the witnesses and documents to be produced. The workman under his own hand admitted that he had committed the fraud alleged and that the charges levelled The management examined Mr. T. R. Arora who tendered his affidavit Ex . M19 . The record shows that he was not cross -examinedby the workman as he was absent on the day the statement of this witness was recorded. The workman however, cross -examined Shri B. B. Malhotra who , by his statement deposed that the workman was given opportunity to engage'a defense representative to defend himself. That the workman had admitted the charges voluntarily at the beginning of the enquiry. That the statement of the workman admitting the charges was recorded by him and the same is exhibited

1284 G1/20089 1876

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19 , 2008/ CHAITRA 30, 1930 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) )

award is passed and reference is answered accordingly.

Let a copy ofthis award be sent to the appropriate government for necessary action and the file be consigned to records after due completion .

KULDIP SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 31 मार्च, 2008

against him are correct . He , however, claimed that he had committed the fraud in connivance with Shri Narinder Singh . Clerk, He further admitted to have paid Rs.45.INK) on different dates. In the end he raised the plea of his being of young age and requested for excuse . He signed the proceedings in English in the presence of Sat Pal Daftri . At no stage he claimed that his confession , recorded by the enquiry officer , was not voluntarily; and that he did not understand the wording of the enquiry proceedings.

का. आ. 875.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय, भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 427/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-03-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12011 /141 / 2001 - आई आर ( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi, the 31st March, 2008

S.O. 875. In pursuancesuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (ReferenceNo. 427/2001 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Union Bank of India and their workmen. which was received by the Central Government on 24-3-2008,

No. L- 12011 / 141 /2001 - IR (B-II ) } RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR

Now coming to the legal side , it is well settled that the domestic enquiry in Industrial cases has great significance . Such an enquiry is not an empty formality but an essential condition to the legality of the disciplinary order. It is required of the disciplinary authority to hold fair and proper enquiry into the conduct of the delinquent official before passing the punishment of dismissal. The nature of such an enquiry is quasi judicial , therefore, it should be conducted by following the principles of natural justice. In substance what is required to be done is that the workman should know the article of charges , the evidence to be produced against him. He should further be given opportunity not only to cross-examine the witnesses of the management but also opportunity to produce evidence in his defence including himself and fair chance to put up his case. From the perusal of the enquiry proceedings, I find that the enquiry officer had given full opportunity to the workman to defend himself. This was also a case where the workman not only in writing but also by his statement before the enquiry officer confessed his guilt and admitted the charges levelled against him without any reservations . In a case where the delinquent official in answer to the charges admits his guilt, there remains nothing more to be enquired into against him and in such a case to hold further enquiry is an empty formality. The misconduct owned and admitted by him therefore. becomes anti thesis of the principles of natural justice and in such cases, the question of prejudice does not arise.

PRESENT :

Shri N. K. R. Mohapatra , Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T. - cum -Labour Court , Bhubaneswar

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO . 427/2001

Date of passing Award-15th February, 2008

BETWEEN

The Management of the Chief Manager, Union Bank of India, UBI Regional Office , 3/ 1 -A, Civic Centre, IRC Village, Nayapalli , Bhubaneswar (Orissa) -751015

...Ist PartyManagement Alûcr examining the record of the file, I am of the opinion that the management had conducted a fair and proper enquiry against the workman and that the punishtnent awarded to him was also proportionate to the misconduct alleged and proved against him. It has come on record that it was not for the first time that the workman had committed fraud in the bank accounts of number of customers but had also committed similar fraud by windling away an amount of Rs . 800 for which he was punished with the stoppage of three annual increments . To retain such an employee in service would prove fatal to the interests of customers who are the backbone of a financial institution . Thus the action of the management to terminate the services of the workman was well justified and he is not entitled to any relief. The 1877 [ भाग -खंड ( i) ]

भारत का रजपत्र : अप्रैल 19, 2008 /चैत्र 30, 1930

AND

Their Workmen, represented through the General Secretary, All Orissa

charges. In view of its above stand, the Union did not adduce any fresh evidence . Rather it wanted to dispose ofthe matter as per Section 11 -A of the Industrial Dispute Act on materials already available on record.

Union Bank Employees Association (BEFI) ,

Regional Office, 3/1 - A, Civic Centre,

IRC Village, Nayapalli

2nd Partion

Bhubaneswar- 751 001

APPEARANCES :

5. The Management on the other hand contended in its written statement that the enquiry was conducted in a fair manner and so much so the punishment given to the workman was neither disproportionate not the same has been based on facts not borne on record.

M/s . S. Das &Associates Advocate

Fer the 1st Party- Management

6. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties the following issues were framed:

For the 2nd Party- Union

M/s . B , C. Bastia & Associates, Advocate

ISSUES

AWARD

1. Whether the reference is maintainable ?

2. Whether the action of the management ofUnion Bank of India by imposing the punishment of dismissal upon Shri Rajendra Kumar Sharma, Clerk/Cashier is justified and legal ?

3. If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?

TheGovernment of India in the Ministry ofLabour, in exerciser of powers conferred by Clause (d ) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Indstrial Disputea Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) have referred the following dispute for adjudication. vide their Order No. L- 12011 /141 /2001 -IR (B- II) , dated 10-10-2001.

FINDINGS

Issue No. 1

"Whether the action of the Management of Union Bank of India by imposing the punishment of dismissal upon Shri Rajendra Kumar Sharma , Clerk/Cashior is justified and legel ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?"

7. Since no evidence worth the name has been adduced by the Union questioning the maintainability of the reference the said issue is answered accordingly in: an affirmative manner.

Isave Nos. 3 & 4

2. During pendency of the case the workman R. K. Sharma died for which his Legal Heirs , such as wife and minor children were added as O.P. -4 , 4 (a) and 4(b).

8. These isues are taken up together as they are inter-linked.

Whileworking as a clerk-cum - cashior under the Management-Bank the deceased -workman was charge. shected for his various prejudicial acts amounting to both gross misconduct and minor misconduct as detailed in the chargesheet marked Ext. -3 which forms part of the record. The charges have been summarized as follows:

Gross Misconduct

(i) Comunitting acts prejudicial to the interest of bank and involving the bank in monetary loss.

( ii) Willful damage to the property of the bank.

Minor Misconduct

(i ) Breach of any rules of the business of the bank or instructions for running to any department.

Before dealing with the various contention of the Union it is profitable to repeat here that by admitting the domestic enquiry to have been conducted fairly in accordance with law, the Union simply confined its argument referring to some of the facts which are available on record in the form of evidence of the witness examined by the enquiry officer. In other words it is submitted that the findings even by the enquiry officer is not supported by evidence and more so the punishment is also disproportionate. In the above premises it is only to be examined whether the Tribunal has got the jurisdiction to scan the evidence on record and whether the punsihment given was proportionate and in accordance with law or not.

3. On completion of above enquiry the Management -Bank issued him with a show cause to explain as to why he shall not be dismissed frum service. Hewas also asked therein to appear for a personal hearing and ultimately he was dismissed from service by the Disciplinary Authority.

9.Relying on the case between the Govt . ofAndhra Pradesh and others Vs. Mohd. Nasrullah Khan reported in 2006-1- LLJ - 1108 , the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State Bank of India and Others Vs. Ramesh Dinakar Punde reported in 2006-10 -LLJ - 563 have observed at Page5 of the said judgement that:

4. Admitting that the departmental proceeding was fairly conducted the Union in its claim statement simply challenged the findings of the Enquiry Officer and the punishment to the perverse and disproportionate to the

"...... the High Court and the Tribunal whila exercising the judicial review do not act as an

;

1878

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19, 2008/CHAITRA 30 , 1930

appellate authority, itsjurisdiction is circumscribed and confined to correct errors of law or procedurat error, if any, resulting in manifest miscarriage of justice or violation of principles of natural justice. Judical review is not akin to adjudication on merit by re-appreciating the evidence as an Appellate Authority,'

10. Similarly in the case of Union of India versus Sardar Bahadur reported in 1972-1- LLJ - 1 it has beenheld by their lordship tha ..

if the aquiry has been properly held the question of adequacy or reliability of the evidence cannot be canvassed before the High Court . A finding can not be characterised as perverse or unsupported by any relevant materials , if it was a reasonable inference from proved facts." 11. From the charge-sheet marked Ext. -3 it appears that the deceased Shri R. K. Sharma was charge -sheeted for mis-conducting himself in violation of the Standing Order by indulging in fraudulent dealing of lorry receipts, cheque purchase and manipulation of figures in his S. B. Account No. 1243 as detailed below.

On 6-1-1996 Jeypore branch received IDBC Nos. 673 and 674 from drawer M/s . Manipal Textile IndustriesLimited drawn on M/ s . Shiva Cloth Centre, Faypore for Rs . 15,930 and Rs . 12,950, respectively. On 12-1-1996 JDBC No. 699 was received by the branch from the drawer M/s , Bharat Vijaya Silk Mills, Surat for Rs . 9,420 . On 12-3-1996, 31 bills including above said.3 bills were handed over to Shri R.K. Sharma by the accountant Shri K.C. Nayak for return due to non -paymentby the party: These bills were entered in the realization Register by Shri R.K. Shartua and also prepared return memo for returning these bills to respective parties by V.P.L. The return/ realization register shows that 3 numbers of bills bearing No. IDBC 699. 673 and 674 were deleted without assigning reason/ remark there against . The V.P.L. register does not show return of I.D.B.C. Nos . 699, 673 and 674. On 23-3-1996 Shri Sharma made an attempt to balance the bills portfolio and shown the figure of Rs . 7.00,355 as balance of I.D.B.C.'s and also put remark " tallied as per physically" . Although Accountant had put his initial just below the above remark , subsequently he wrote three I.D.B.C. numbers will amount and put remark "The CR's of 673 and 674 are missing and 699 initially missing" .

A subsidiary ledger as of 25-3-1996 shows as under:

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] Inland bills collection (IBC)

Rs . 8,446 Localbills for collection (LBC) Rs. 48,295

Rs. 8,31,348 The opening balance of general ledger of IBC (Contra -items ) on 23-3-1996 shows a figure of Rs. 20,46,342. On 25-3-1996 contra-voucher was posted as under :

Debit 1.B.C.

Rs. 14,16,173 CreditI.B.R.

Rs. 14,16,173

AND

Debit 1.B.R.

Rs. 2,01,179 Credry L.B.C.

Rs. 2,01,179 Thus, IBC ( contra-lens) figure as on 23-3-1996 stated at the end et 25-3-1996 as under:

Rs. 20,46.342 I.B.C. opening babe las per general ledger)

Dr. I.B.C.

Rs . 14,16,173 Credit 1.B.C.

Rs. 6,30,169

Rs . 2,01,179

Rs. 8,31,348 The 1.D.B.C. balance shows a difference of Rs . 8 (Rs . 7,00,355-Rs . 7,00,363) . The contra voucher was passed taking the physical bills, cheques in band and the difference in the general ledger to balance the books . While balancing the books on 23-3-1996 the missing bills came to light . The Branch Manager enquired the matter with Transport Company and persued the matter with drawee to get the two bills bearing Nos . 673 and 674 retired on 8-5-1996. On enquiry on 12-10-1996 by the Branch Manager, with the Transport Company M/ s . Lucky Bharat Garrage Private Limited about the fate of Lorry Receipt Nos . 078043 and 078060, the Transport Company provided the original copies of Lorry Receipts . The Lorry Receipt No. 078060 pertains to bill No. I.D.B.C. 673 and Lorry Receipt No. 078043 pertains to bill No. L.D.B.C. 674. The back side of the said Lorry Receipts bear Bank's endorsement , which reads as under:

Rs . 7,00,363

Inland documentary bills of

collection ( I.D.B.C.)

Rs. 74,244

Cheque for collection (CC)

"All our stamp cancelled signed by Shri K.C. Nayak, accountant of the branch," [ भाग II- खंड ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19, 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930

The said wordings was attempted tobe over written with stamp as " please pay/deliver to the order of M/s . Shiva Cloth Centre ." As the said wording didnot give pruper message another stamp was affixed reading as "please pay/deliver to the order of M/s. Shiva Cloth Centre. " The over writings and signature are in the handwriting of Shri R.K. Sharuna. M/s . Shiva Cloth Centre is banking with leypore Branch since 1987 and is having a cash-credit account with the branch . A cash credit limit ofRs. 25,000/- was sanctioned to this party in 1988 which was enhanced byRegional Office, Bhubaneswar and renewed to Rs . 50,000 in March 1996. The operation of the party is not satisfactory.

2. Shri R.K. Sharma is having a joint SB Account No. 3599 in his name and with the name of Shri S.C. Sharma. On 20-3-1994 Shri RK . Sharma applied in standard form for immediate crodit of outstation/local instrument uptoRs . 5,000 for crediting the above said SB account and tenidered a cheque No: 005787 for Rs. 2,000 drawn by Shri S.K. Sharma on United Bank of India, Keonjhar Branch. The said cheque was purchased on 21-3-1994 and was credited in the above said S.B. Account . The cheque was returned unpaidby United Bank of India. However, the outstanding entry in the cheque purchased on 21-3-1994 was adjusted only on 28-6-1994 when Shri Sharma deposited cash of Rs . 2,000 in SB Account No. 3599.

On28-6-1994 Shri Sharma again applied for cheque purchase facility for Rs. 4,500 and tendered the cheque No. 005788 drawn by Shri S.C. Sharma on United Bank of India, Keonjhar, Branch. The said choque was purchased on 29-6-1994 and credited to joint account No. 2919 standing in the name of Shri R.K. Sharma and Shri S.C. Sharma. The said cheque was returned unpaid. The cheque was debited to the account only on 12-12-1994.

On 31-10-1995 and on 12-12-1995 Shri R.K. Sharma tendered 2 choques bearing Nos . 05789 and 05790 for Rs . 4,000 and Rs . 2,500, respectively for purchase. The SB Account No. 2919 was credited with the amount of above said cheques. Both the cheques were drawn on United Bank of India, Keonjhar Branch. Both the cheques were returned umpaid on 18-12-1995 with the remarks "refer to drawer-insufficient balance". As both the above said choques were returned unpaid by UnitedBank of India , Shri R.K. Sharma requested the Branch Managerto collect the cheques on collectingbasis. The Branch Manager permitted Shri Sharina to collect the choques on collection basis and put CC Nos. 450 and 451 on OBC register. The Branch

1879 Manager allowed Shri Sharma to take the cheques against hisproper acknowledgement bot doubting the integrity of Shri Sharma got a mesox copy of OBC register . Subsequently their was an attempt made by Shri Sharma to erase the signature puton OBC register.

3. Shri R. K. Sharma is having SB Accout No. 1243 with Jeypore Branch. As per duty 1st allotted byBranch Manager , Shri J.Shrinivas vtas allotted duty ofposting of saving bank ledger and lie had posted the transaction upto 27th August, 1996 in the lodger in SB Account No. 1243. On 27-8-1996 the balance in SB Account No. 1243 was Rs. 47.47. On 29-8-1996 the balance in $B Account No. 1243 was the SB Account No. 1213 which are as under :-

Credit voucher of Rs . 4,500 (Transfer entry from SBAccount No. 1855)

Debit voucher for Rs . 2,000 (Favouring Tirumala Mutual Benefit Fund) collected through clearning by Andhra Bank, Jeypore Branch,

Debit voucher for Rs . 3,040 ( withdrawal slip ) .

All the above debit and credit vouchers wate posted in ledger by Shri R.K. Sharma. If the delit and credit vouchers are put together alongwith opening balance the following position emerges in the account .

Opening balance as on 27-8-96 Cr.47.47 Credit voucher Rs. 4,500 Cr. 4,547.47 Debit Voucher Rs . 3,040

Cr. 1,507.47 Debitvoucher Rs .2,000

Dr. 507.47 To pass the above cheque it was inceded to enhance the figure of Rs . 47.47 and therefore, an attempt was made by Shri Sharma to make the figure read as Rs. 547.47 by inserting a figure 5 before original balance ofRs. 47.47 . The attempted fraud in respect of above transaction was detected by Shri Praful Chandra Rath, Clerk of Jeypote Branch,

The operation in SB Account No. 1243 of Shri R.K. Sharma also shows that Shri Sharma had depositedRs .70,000 on 20-8-1996 and on the same dayhe had issued cheque for Rs. 70,000 favouring Mis .Konark Vision. The cheque was debited is SB Account No. 1243 and credit was given in the account of Mis . Konark Vision by transfer entry on 20-8-1996 . M/s . Konark Vision has been banking with Jeypore Branch and enjoying CC (Hyp) limited of Rs . I lac. Since Décember 1994.

880

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 19 , 2008/CHAITRA 30, 1930

incoripetent to act as an Enquiry Officer, I would like to refer to Rule 19.14 of the first Bipartite Settlement contained in Kapoor's Service Conditions in Banks as follows:-

The proprietor of this firm is Mr. Mahesh Dhulakia who is an ex-employer of Jeypore Branch . He has resigned in the year 1984. M/s . Konark Vision had applied for, CC ( Hyp ) limit of Rs . I lac . On 24-12-1994. The application, credit information of Firm. Shate Transfer Form, stock statement dated 7-11-1996 were all in the handwriting of Shri R.K. Sharma .

4. it is on record that on 13-11-1996 Shri Sharma had refused to accept the duties assigned to him by the Accountant of the branch . Ou reporting this matter to the Branch Manager a show - cause Memorandum was issued to Shri Sharma by the Branch Manager which Shri Sharma refused 10 accept.

Shri Sharma is informed that above said act ofomission and commission on his part constitute following misconducts and he is hereby charged of the same:

GROSS MISCONDUCTS

1. Doing acts prejudicial to the interest of the bank involving the bank in monetary loss.

2. Wilful damage to the property of the bank .

MINOR MISCONDUCTS

1. Breach of any rule of the business of the bank or instructions for the running of any department.

19.14-The Chief Executive Officer or the principal officer in India , ofa bank , or an alternate officer at the Head Office or principal office appointed by him for the purpose , shall decide which officer( s ) shall be empowered to hold enquiry and take disciplinary action in the case of each office or establishment. He shall also decide which officer or a body higher in status than the officer authorized to take disciplinary action shall be empowered to deal with an dispose of any appeals against orders passed in disciplinary matters . The names of such officers or the body who arc empowered to pass the original orders or hear and dispose of the appeal shall . from time to time . be published on the bank's notice board. Such appellate authority, shall, if the employee concerned is so desirous , in a case of dismissal , hear him or his representatives before disposing of the appeal. In cases where hearings are required to be given and are requested for, such hearings shall commence within one month from the date of receipt of appeal and shall be disposed of within one month from the date of conclusion of such hearings. The period within which an appeal can be preferred shall be 45 days from the date on which the original order has been communicated in writing to the employee concerned.

Shri Sharma is informed that further disciplinary action including holding of departmental inquiry against him will be taken by another Disciplinary Authority, Shri R.R. Mohanty, Deputy Manager ( P) . Zonal Office , East Zone , Calcutta. Shri Sharma , ifhe so desires , may submit his explanation in writing within 7 days from receipt of this memorandum to the Enquiry Officer directly. If he fails to submit the written explanation to the Enquiry Officer within the above stipulated period it will be deemed that he does not wish to avail of the opportunity given to him and Enquiry Officer willbe free to proceed, further with the enquiry.

14. From the above bipartite settlement it is thus clear that the Enquiry Officer is being appointed under certainprinciples and the same is also being published from time to time for general information of the employees. In the appeal memoranduru of the workman there appears no whisper that the Enquiry Officer was either incompetent to hold the enquiry or that he was biased towards him. Furthermore, no evidence worth the name has been adduced to indicate that the enquiry officer had acted in a prejudicial manner in conducting the enquiry or in awarding the punishment . When admittedly the workman has fairly conceded that the enquiry was conducted fairly, his present submission that the Disciplinary Authority should not have acted as the EnquiryOfficerdeserves no merit . So much so under the bipartite settlement no restriction has been imposed for aDisciplinary Authority to act as an Enquiry Officer . Under these premises the first objection of the disputant- workman is found to have no consequential effect at this belated stage.

12. With reference to the above charges and the cvidence collected during the enquiry stage it was argued by the Counsel for the disputant that (i ) that the enquiry was conducted by the Disciplinary Authority himself and as such the entire findings and punishment given to the disputant-workman was bad under law and that (ii ) the findings of the Enquiry Officer was not borne on record in as much as his entire findings is on surmise..

15. As regards the second objection that the findings of the Enquiry Officer was not based on the materials available on record, the counsel appearing for 13. As regards the first contention ofthe disputant- workman that the Disciplinary Authority was totally भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 19 , 2008/चैत्र 30, 1930.

[ भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

1801

has committed an legality in dismissing the workin from service.

16. In view of the above , the action of the Managetnent in dismissing the workman, from servic can not beviewed in ajaundice eye to say the Management has exceeded its limit in passing the above order Accordingly, I find rio merit in the various contention pf the workman and as such the deserve's no relief.

17. The reference is answered accordingly.

N. K. R. MOHAPATRA. Presiding Officer

List of Witnesses examined on behalf of the 2nd Party-Union

No witnesses have been examined on behalf ofthe 2nd. Party-Union

List of Documents Exhibited on behalf of the 2nd Party-Workma

Ext. I Copy of Full Enquiryreport.

Ext. 2 : Copy of letter No. 2629, dated 18-9-1995 to Shri R.K. Sharma .

Ext. 3 : Copy of charge-sheet No. CO - IRD - AS- VIG- 239-97, dated 21-6-1997.

Ext. 4 : Copy ofletter dated 4-9-1997 of Shri R.K. Sharma to the Enquiry Officer, Camp- Jeypore.

Ext. 5 : Copy of order proposing punishment No.EZ- DP-RRM- 1286, dated 10-11-1997.

Ext . 6 Copy of final finding in the departmental enquiry dated 30-10-1997.

Ext. 7 : Copy of Appeal dated 21-1-1998 for review of punishment of dismissal order sent by Shri R.K. Sharma to General Manager (1), UBI , C.O. Appellate Authority, Mumbai .

Ext. 8 : Copy of the order ofthe Appellate Authority on the appeal of Shri R.K. Sharma.

Ext. 9 : Copy of final findings of the Departmental Enquiry into the charges/allegations levelled against Shri R.K. Sharma , Clerk-cum- Cashier(under suspension) , Jeypore Branch .

List of Witnesses on behalf of the ist Party- Management

No witnesses also have examined on behalf of the Ist Party-Management. 5

the disputant drove the Tribunal to the evidence recorded during enquiry stage and submitted that when according to the Management Witness the bank had sustained no loss. it was improper on the part of the Disciplinary Autborityto hold the workman guilty of causing wilful damageto the property of the bank. It is also submitted that when the act of the disputant -workman had not resulted in any monetary loss to the bank the other gross misconduct No. 1 should also be treated as not proved. It is no doubt true that during cross - examination the Management Witness have deposed that none of the charges had resulted in any loss to the bank but it must be remembered that while dealing with a subject of the present nature it is not necessary for the enquiry officer or the Tribunal to look into the exact monetary loss sustained or likely to be sustained by the Bank. As per clause 19.5 ( J ) of the bipartite settlement any act prejudicial to the interest of the bank or gross negligence or negligence involving or likely to involve the bank in serious loss would amount to gross misconduct . From the reply to the show cause as given by the disputant- workman marked Ext .-4 it transpires that he has almost admitted all the charges with some explanation or other. To site some example, one of the proved charges indicate that to accommodate some of his debit voucher on 29-8-1996 the delinquent had manipulated his own S.B. Account by increasing his opening balance, Similarly another proved charge shows that by fraudulently crediting Rs . 70,000 in his own S.B. Account he had issued a cheque of same value in favour of M/ s. Konark Vision . These acts, besides other proved charges, itself speak that the delinquent had indulged in acts prejudicial to the interest of the bank likely to involve the bank in serious losses. It has been held that in a plethora of decisions by the Apex Court that in the banking business absolute devotion, diligence , integrity and honesty needs tobepreserved by every bank employee and in particular the bank officer so that the confidence of the public/ depositors would be impaired. It is for this reason, that when a bank officer commits misconduct as in the present case, for his personal ends and against the interest of the bankand the depositors, he must be dealt with ironhands and he does not deserve to be dealt with leniently. At para 21 ofthe case between State Bank of India &Others Vs. Ramesh Dinkar Punde reported in 2006 -III - LLJ -563 it has been held that the scope ofjudicial review is very limited. Sympathy or generosity as a factor is impermissible . Loss of confidence is the primary factor and not the amount of money misappropriated. Since in the instant case the above referred two instances, besides many others, speak of temporary misappropriation of Bank's fund , there can be no room to say that the bank 1882

[ PART 11- SE , 3 ( it) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 19 , 2008/ CHAITRA 30. 1930

List of Documents Exhibited on behalf of the 1st Party- Management

Ext. D: Copy of letter No. PER/ DS/ 165 / 98 dated 21-1-1998 from Br. Manager. Jeypore ( K) Branch to the Asstt . Manager . R.O. Bhubaneswar.

Ext. A Copy of statement dated 29-11-1987 at the personal hearing submitted at Zonal Office, Calcuta.

Ext . E : Copy of personal hearing granted to Shri R.K. Sharma dated 9-6-1998 .

Ext. 8 : Copy of letter No. EZ - DP- 1225 , dated 5-12-1997 of Deptt . of Personnel , Zonal Office. Calcutta to Shri R.K. Sharma .

Ext . F : The copy of the final order of the Appellate Authority No. CO - IRD - 1123-98 , dated 16-7-1998(in Hindi ).

Ext. C : Copy of staff circular No. 2309 , dated 28-5-1981.

Printed by theManager. Govt of India Press , Ring Road . Mayapurı , New Delhi - 110064 andPublished by the Controller of Publications . Delhi - 110054.2008