ει
रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05
REGD. NO . D. L. (N) 04 /0007 /2003-05 भारत सत्यमेव जयते का राजपत्र The Gazette of India
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY '
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 311
नई दिल्ली, जुलाई 27 अगस्त2 , 2008 , शनिवार / श्रावण 5- श्रावण 11 , 1930
NEW DELHI , JULY 27 - AUGUST 2 , 2008 ; SATURDAY / SRAVANA 5- SRAVANA 11 , 1930 No. 311
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II- खण्ड 3 उप- खण्ड (ii)
PART II Section 3- Sub- section (ii )
भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence )
कार्मिक, लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय
(कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 22 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2020.-केंद्र सरकार दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस. स्थापना अधिनियम 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए हरियाणा सरकार, कार्मिक विभाग की दिनांक 19-3-2008 के शुद्धिपत्र के साथ पठित दिनांक 25-1-2008 की अधिसूचना संख्या 20/27/02एस ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत प्राप्त सहमति से पाठ्य पुस्तकों के मुद्रण और आपूर्ति, जिसके लिए दिनांक 21-7-2000 को निविदाएं खोली गई थी , का ठेका देने में हुई वित्तीय अनियमितताओं के मामले में श्री संजीव कुमार , भा.प्र.से. ( हरियाणा -85 ) पूर्व राज्य परियोजना निदेशक , हरियाणा प्राथमिक शिक्षा परियोजना परिषद् चण्डीगढ़ के विरूद्ध लगे आरोपों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों के अधिकारों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार पूरे हरियाणा राज्य पर करती है।
[ सं. 228/36/2008 - ए.वी.डी.- II }
चंद्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव 2745 G1/2008
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL , PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
(Department of Personnel and Training ) New Delhi , the 22nd July, 2008
S.O. 2020. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act . 1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946) , the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Haryana, Personnel vide Notification No. 20 /27/ 02-2S ( 1 ) dated 25th January, 2008 read with corrigendum dated 19-3-2008 , hereby extends the powers andjurisdiction ofthe members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Haryana for investigation of the charges / allegations against Shri Sanjiv Kumar, IAS ( IIY - 85) , formerly State Project Director Haryana Prathmik Shiksha Pariyojna Parishad. Chandigarh and others in the matter of financial irregularities in award of contract for printing and supply of text books for which tenders were opened on 21-7-2000 .
No. 228 /36/2008 - AVD - II | CHANDRA PRAKASH , Under Secy .
(4053) 4054
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
नई दिल्ली, 24 जुलाई , 2008
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Jaipur, the 23rd July , 2008 No. 10/2008-09
S.O. 2022. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- clause (vi ) ofclause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income TaxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) read with rule 2CA of the Income Tax Rules , 1962 the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax , Jaipur hereby approves " Vidya Bharti Sansthan , Sikar" for thepurpose of said Section for the A. Y. 2008-09 & onwards .
Provided that the society conforms to and complies with the provisions of sub - clause (vi ) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with rule 2CA ofthe Income Tax Rules , 1962 .
[No. CCIT /JPR/ Addl.CIT (Hqrs . )/ 10 ( 23C)( vi )/2008-09 ] B. S. DHILLON , Chief Commissioner of Income Tax का.आ. 2021. - कोद्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केरल राज्य सरकार , गृह ( एम ) विभाग की अधिसूचना सं. 10022/एम -3 /07/होम दिनांक 13 जुलाई , 2007 द्वारा प्राप्त सहमति से तथा डब्ल्यूपी ( सी ) सं. 2141/2008 ( एस) में माननीय केरल उच्च न्यायालय द्वारा पारित दिनांक 10 अप्रैल , 2008 के आदेश के अनुपालन में 13 जनवरी , 2005 को वल्लयार ग्रामीण उद्योग , पल्लाक्कड़ में छापे में चन्दन लकड़ी की जब्ती से संबंधित मरयूर फोरेस्ट रेंज , केरल के ओआर 9/2005 से संबंधित अपराधों के अन्वेषण के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण केरल राज्य पर करती है ।
स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय [सं. 228/49/2007- ए.वी.डी.- II ]
(स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण विभाग )
चंद्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव
नई दिल्ली, 23 जून , 2008
New Delhi , the 24th July, 2008
का. आ. 2023. केंद्रीय सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए और भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सक परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 मे निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है; अर्थात्ः
2. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम संख्या 73 के बाद स्तम्भ 1 , 2 , 3 की वर्तमान प्रविष्टियों के अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या और प्रविष्टियां रखी जाएंगी , अर्थात्ः-- 74. एच एन बी 1. सीमा डेंटल कालेज, ऋषिकेश बी डी एस , गढ़वाल युनिवर्सिटी , ( i ) बेचलर आफ डेंटल एच एन बी श्रीनगर ( गढ़वाल , सर्जरी ( यदि यह 30-8-2007 उतरांचल) प्रदान की गई हो)
( गढ़वाल को अथवा इसके उपरान्त यूनिवर्सिटी , श्रीनगर गढ़वाल उतरांचल) S.O. 2021. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946) , the Central Government with the consent of the StateGovernment of Kerala , Home (M ) Department vide NotificationNo. 10022/ M - 3/07/Home dated 13-7-2007 and in compliance with the order dated 10-4-2008 passed by Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in WP (C) No. 2141 of2008 (S) , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Kerala for the investigation of the offences involved in OR 9/2005 of Marayoor Forest Range, Kerala relating to seizure of Sandal Wood in the raid conducted at Wallayar Rural Industries , Pallakkad on 13-1-2005 .
[सं. वी. 12017/49/2001 -डी ई ] [No. 228/49/ 2007 -AVD - II ]
राज सिंह , अवर सचिव CHANDRA PRAKASH , Under Secy . MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (Department of Health and Family Welfare)
New Delhi , the 23rd June , 2008
कार्यालय, मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त जयपुर , 23 जुलाई , 2008
सं. 10/2008-09
S.O. 2023. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (2 ) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 (16 of 1948 ) , the Central Government , after consultation withDental Council of India , hereby, makes the following amendments in Part - I of the Schedule to the said Act , namely:-
2.Inpart- 1 ofthe Schedule to the Dentists Act , 1948, after serial No. 73 , the following serial number and entries shall be inserted, namely: ---
1. Seema Dental
Garhawal
College
का.आ. 2022.- आयकर नियम , 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 वां ) की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 सी ) की उप - धारा ( vi ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त , जयपुर एतद्वारा निर्धारण वर्ष 2008-09 एवं आगे के लिए कथित धारा के उद्देश्य से " विद्या भारती संस्थान , सीकर " को स्वीकृति देते हैं ।
Rishikesh
University,
" 74.H.N.B.Garhwal University , Srinagar (Garhwal , Uttarnchal )
(i) Bachelor of
(Garhwal.
Dental Surgery
BDS , FL.N.B. Srinagar Uttranchal) बशर्ते कि समिति आयकर नियम, 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 के उप- खण्ड (23सी ) की उप - धारा ( vi ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप कार्य करें ।
(When granted on or after 30-8-2007
[क्रमांक:मुआआआआआ/( मु )/जय/10( 23सी ) ( vi )/08-09 ]
[No.V- 12017 / 49 / 2001 - DE ]
RAJ SINGH , Under Secy.
बी. एस. ढिल्लो , मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
(दंत शिक्षा अनुभाग ) नई दिल्ली , 24 जून , 2008
का. आ. 2024. केंद्रीय सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए और भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद से परामर्श करने के बाद एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है ; अर्थात्ः 2. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में एन.टी.आर. यूनिवर्सिटी आफ हैल्थ सांइसेज , विजयवाड़ा, आ.प्र. द्वारा दी जाने वाली दंत चिकित्सा अर्हता को मान्यता देने के संबंध में क्रम संख्या 50 के सामने स्तम्भ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों के अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टयां रखी जाएंगी , अर्थात्:-
"XII . श्री वेंकट सांई इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ डेंटल सांइसेज , महबूब नगर, आंध्र प्रदेश
बेचलर आफ डेंटल सर्जरी बीडी एस , एन.टी.आर. यूनिवर्सिटी आफ हैल्थ सांइसेज , विजयवाड़ा, आ. प्र.
(यदि 20-11-2007 को अथवा इसके पश्चात् प्रदान कीगई हो)
XIII. श्री सांई डेंटल कालेज , एंड रिर्सच इंस्टीट्यूट , श्रीकाकुलम , आंध्र प्रदेश
बीडी एस , एन.टी.आर. यूनिवर्सिटी ऑफ हैल्थ सांइसेज, विजयवाड़ा, आ. प्र. "
बेचलर आफ डेंटल सर्जरी (यदि 22-03-2008 को अथवा इसके पश्चात प्रदान की गई हो)
[सं. वी -12017/36/2002 -डी ई ] राज सिंह , अवर सचिव (Dental Education Section)
New Delhi , the 24th June , 2008
S.O. 2024. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 (16 of 1948 ) , the Central Government, after consultation withDental Council of India, hereby, makes the following amendments in Part - 1 of the Schedule to the said Act , namely:-
2. Under the excisting entries of column 2 and 3 against Serial No. 50 , in part - I ofthe Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 , ( 16 of 1948) , pertaining to recognition ofDental Qualification awarded by N.T.R. University of Health Sciences , Vijaywada, A.P. , the following entries shall be inserted, thereunder :-
" XII Sri Venkata Sai Institute of Dental Sciences , Mahaboob Nagar, Andhra Pradesh
BDS , N.T.R. University of HeathSciences ,
Vijaywada, A.P. Bachelor of Dental Surgery (whengranted on or after 20-11-2007)
XIII Sree Sai Dental College and Research Institute , Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh
4055
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
Bachelor ofDental Surgery (whengranted on or after 22-03-2008)
BDS , N.T.R. University of Heath Sciences , Vijaywada, A.P. "
[No.V- 12017/36/2002-DE] RAJ SINGH , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 25 जून , 2008
का. आ. 2025.-केंद्रीय सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 मे निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है; अर्थात्ः-
2. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में पश्चिम बंगाल स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , कोलकाता ( पश्चिम बंगाल ) द्वारा दी जाने वाली दंत चिकित्सा अर्हता को मान्यता देने के संबंध में क्रम संख्या 71 के सामने स्तम्भ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों के अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित डेंटल कालेजों के संबंध में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टयां रखी जाएंगी , अर्थात्ः- "II . गुरु नानक इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ डेंटल सांइसेज , एंड रिसर्च, कोलकाता , पश्चिम बंगाल
बी डी एस , पश्चिम बंगाल स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , कोलकाता "
(i ) बेचलर आफ डेंटल सर्जरी (यदि यह 28-2-2007 को अथवा इसके उपरान्त प्रदान की गई हो)
बीडी एस , पश्चिम बंगाल स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , कोलकाता "
" III . नार्थ बंगाल डेंटल कालेज , दार्जीलिंग , पश्चिम बंगाल (i) बेचलर आफ डेंटल सर्जरी (यदि यह6-12-2007 को अथवा इसके उपरान्त प्रदान कीगई हो)
[सं. बी -12017/37/2002 - डी ई ]
राज सिंह, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 25th June , 2008
S.O. 2025. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (2 ) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 (16 of 1948 ) , the Central Government , after consultation with Dental Council of India , hereby , makes the following amendments in Part - I of the Schedule to the said Act , namely:-
2. In the excisting entries of column 2 and 3 against Serial No. 71 , in part - I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) , pertainingto recognition of Dental Qualification awarded by the West Bengal University of Health Sciences , Kolkata ( West Bengal ) the following entries in respect of following dental college shall be inserted, thereunder:-
" II Guru Nanak Institute of Dental Sciences , and Research , Kolkata, West Bengal
BDS , The West Bengal University of Heath Sciences , Kolkata (i) Bachelor of Dental Surgery (ifgranted on or after 28-8-2007) 4056
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
(1) Bachelor ofDental Surgery
III North Bengal Dental College Darjeeling (West Bengal ) (ifgranted on or after 6-12-2007)
BDS, The West Bengal University ofHeath Sciences , Kolkata " [No. V- 2017/ 37 /2002- DE] RAJ SINGH , Under Secy .
नई दिल्ली, 26 जून , 2008
का. आ. 2026, केंद्रीय सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग-1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है ; अर्थात्ः
2. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 की अनुसूची के भाग-1 में क्रम संख्या 72 के बाद निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या और प्रविष्टियां रखी जाएंगी , अर्थात्:--
केरल 73. अमृताविश्व विद्यापीठम ( सम विश्वविद्यालय,
बी डी एस , अमृता विश्व विद्या- पीठम ( सम विश्वविद्यालय , केरल 1. अमृना स्कूल ऑफ डेंटिस्ट्री , कोच्चि ( केरल ) ( i ) बेचलर आफ डेंटल सर्जरी ( यदि यह 20-9-2007 को अथवा इसके उपरान्त प्रदान की गई हो)
[सं. बी -12017/51/2002 -डी ई ] राज सिंह , अवर सचिव New Delhi . the 26th June , 2008
S.0. 2026.- in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act . 1948 (16 of 1948 ) , the Central Government , after consultation with Dental Council of India , hereby , makes the following amendments in Part- 1 of the Schedule to the said Act , namely:-
2. In part- 1 of the Schedule to the Dentists Act , 1948 , Ler Serial No. 72 , the following serial number and entries saai be inserted , namely :---
Vishwa
Amrita I. Amrita School of Dentistry , Kochi (Kerla)
73. (Whengranted on or after 20-9-2007)
Vidyapee- ( i) Bachelor of Dental Surgery tham (Deemed University), Kerala
BDS , Amrita Vishwa Vidyapee- tham (Deemed University) , Kerala
[No.V - 12017 / 51 / 2002 -DE] RAJ SINGH , Under Secy.
[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 2. एस आर एम विज्ञान एवं प्रौद्योगिक संस्थान ( सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , चेन्नई द्वारा प्रदत्त दंत चिकित्सा अर्हता की मान्यता के संबंध में दन्त चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम सं. 65 के सामने मौजूद प्रविष्टियों में एस आर एम डेंटल कालेज , चेन्नई के बारे में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां अन्तः स्थापित की जाएंगी :-
( II ) मास्टर ऑफ डेंटल सर्जरी
(i ) पेरियोडोंटिक्स ( यदि यह 28-3-2008 को अथवा उसके उपरान्त प्रदान की गई हो) एम डी एस ( पेरियोडोंटिक्स ) , एस आर एम विज्ञान एवं प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थान ( सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , चेन्नई
एम डी एस (प्रोस्थोडोंटिक्स ) ,
विज्ञान एवं प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थान
(सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , चेन्नई (ii ) प्रोस्थोडोंटिकल ( यदि यह 26-3-2008 को अथवा उसके उपरान्त प्रदान की गई हो)
( iii ) ओरल एवं मेक्सिल्लो फेसियल सर्जरी ( यदि यह 28-3-2008 को अथवा उसके उपरान्त प्रदान की गई हो ) एम डी एस ( ओरल सर्जरी ) , विज्ञान एवं प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थान ( सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , चेन्नई
( iv ) कन्जरवेटिव डेंटिस्ट्री (यदि यह 28-3-2008 कोअथवा उसके उपरान्त प्रदान की गई हो ) एम डी एस ( कन्जरवेटिव डेंटिस्ट्री ) , विज्ञान एवं प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थान (सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , चेन्नई
[सं. वी. -12017/21 /2003 डी ई । के. वी. एस. रात्र , उप सचिव New Delhi , the 3rd July, 2008
S.O. 2027.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act . 1948 (16 of 1948 ) , the Central Government , after consultation with Dental Council of India , hereby , makes the following amendments in Part-I of the Schedule to the said Act , namely : --
2. In the existing entries of columns 2 & 3 against Serial No. 65 , in part - 1 of the Schedule to the Dentists Act . 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) pertaining to recognition of Dental Qualification awardedby SRM Institute of Sciences & Technology ( Deemed University ) , Chennai , the following entries in respect of SRM Dental College , Chennai shall be inserted thereunder : --
( II ) Master of Dental Surgery
( i) Periodonites
(When granted on
or after 28-3-2008 )
नई दिल्ली, 3 जुलाई , 2008
MDS ( Periodontics ) SRM Insti- tute of Sciences & Technology (Deemed University) , Chennai .
(ii) Prosthodontics
(When granted on
or after 26-3-2008 )
का.आ. 2027.-दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद एतद्द्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है ; अर्थात्:-
MDS ( Prosthodontics ) SRM Institute of Sciences & Technology (Deemed University ) , Chennai .
(iii) Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (When granted on or after 28-3-2008)
MDS ( Oral Surgery ) SRM Institute of Sciences & Techno- logy( Deemed University), Chennai .
4057
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/श्रावण 11 , 1930 '
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
MDS (Con . Dentistry ) SRM Insti- tute of Sciences & Technology ( Deemed University) , Chennai .
(iv) Conservative Denti- stry (When granted on or after 28-3-2008 )
[No. V. 12017/21 /2003 -DE] K. V. S. RAO , Dy. Secy.
उक्त प्रथम अनुसूची में " डा. एन.टी.आर. यूनिवर्सिटी ऑफ हैल्थ सांइसेज , विजयवाड़ा, आंध्र प्रदेश के सामने ' मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता ' [ स्तम्भ ( 2 ) में ] शीर्षक के अतंर्गत और " पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण " [ स्तम्भ ( 3 ) में ] शीर्षक के अतंर्गत निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्ः- नई दिल्ली, 17 जुलाई , 2008
3
2
एम.बी.बी.एस.
बैचलर ऑफ मेडिसन एंड बैचलर ऑफ सर्जरी
का. आ. 2028.-केंद्रीय सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा10 की उपधारा (2 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग-1 मे निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है; अर्थात्ः
यह एक मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी यदि यह डा. एन.टी.आर. यूनिवर्सिटी आफ हैल्थ सांइसेज , विजयवाड़ा, आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा वर्ष 2006 से एमएनआर मेडिकल कालेज एंड हास्पिटल , संगरेड्डी , आंध्र प्रदेश में प्रशिक्षण प्राप्त कर रहे छात्रों के संबंध में प्रदान की गई हो ।
[सं. यू. 12012/82/2000 - एम. ई. ( पी- II ) खंड- II ] 2. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में संतोष डेंटल कालेज एंड हॉस्पीटल , गाजियाबाद के संबंध में चौधरी चरण सिंह विश्वविद्यालय , मेरठ , उत्तर प्रदेश द्वारा प्रदत्त दंत चिकित्सा अर्हता को मान्यता देने के सेबंध में क्रम संख्या 56 के सामने स्तम्भ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों के अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां रखी जाएंगी , अर्थात्ः
एन. बारिक, अवर सचिव संतोष डेंटल कालेज एंड हॉस्पीटल , गाजियाबाद
New Delhi , the 21st July 2008 " II मास्टर आफ डेंटल सर्जरी
एम.डी.एस , ( ओरल सर्जरी चौधरी चरण सिंह विश्वविद्यालय , मेरठ , उत्तर प्रदेश "
( 1 ) ओरल एंड मेक्सिलोफेशियल सर्जरी ) ( यदि यह 19-02-2008 को अथवा इसके उपरान्त प्रदान कीगई हो)
S.O. 2029. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) , the Central Government , after consulting the Medical Council of India , hereby, makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act , namely:-
[सं. वी. 12017/13/2003 -डी ई ] राज सिंह , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 17th July, 2008
In the said First Schedule against " Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences , Vijaywada , Andhra Pradesh " under the heading ' Recognized Medical Qualification ' [ in column (2 ) ] and under the heading "Abbreviation for Registration " [ in column (3 ) ] , the following shall be inserted, namely :---
3
2
S.O. 2028.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) , the Central Government, after consulation with Dental Council of India , hereby , makes the following amendments in Part - I of the Schedule to the said Act, namely: -
M.B.B.S.
Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery
2. In the excisting entries of column 2 and 3 against Serial No. 56 , in part - 1 of the Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 , ( 16 of 1948 ) , pertaining to recognition of Dental Qualification in respect of Santosh Dental College and Hospital , Ghaziabad awarded by Chaudhary Charan Singh University , Meerut , Uttar Pradesh , the following entries shall be inserted , thereunder:-
Santosh Dental College & Hospital , Ghaziabad
"( ii ) Master of Dental Surgery
MDS (Oral Surgery)
(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by Dr. NTR University ofHealth Sciences , Vijaywada , Andhra Pradesh with effect from the year 2006 in respect of students being trained at M.N.R. MedicalCollege & Hospital , Sangareddy , Andhra
Ch . Charan Singh
(1) Oral & Maxillofaical Surgery (When granted on or after
Pradesh)
19-02-2008).
University, Meerut ,
Uttar Pradesh
[No.U - 12012/82/2000- ME ( P - II ) ] N. BARIK, Under Secy.
मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय [No.V- 12017/13 /2003 -DE] RAJ SINGH , Under Secy .
(उच्चतर शिक्षा विभाग )
नई दिल्ली , 21 जुलाई , 2008
नई दिल्ली , 22 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2030. केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप-नियम 4 के अनुसरण में एतद्वारा मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय के अधीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को , जिनके 80 प्रतिशत का. आ. 2029.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है; अर्थात्ः 4058
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 2, 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, अधिसूचित करती है:-
1. विश्वविद्यालय अनुदान आयोग , बहादुरशाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002
2. जवाहर नवोदय विद्यालय , मैसूर, कर्नाटक-570026
[सं. 11011-7/2005 - रा.भा.ए. ]
और, भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय के का.आ. 370 तारीख 19 फरवरी 2008 द्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत भारत के राजपत्र के भाग 2 , खण्ड 3 , उपखण्ड ( ii ) तारीख 23 फरवरी , 2008 को प्रकाशित अधिसूचना द्वारा केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उपरोक्त जमीन के अधिग्रहण या अधिकार प्राप्त करने के लिए अपने मन्तव्य की सूचना देने के लिए 26 फरवरी 2008 से एक वर्ष की और अवधि निर्धारित की है ।
अनिता भटनागर जैन , संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT (Department of Higher Education)
और , केन्द्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न उक्त अनुसूची में विहित उक्त भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्य है ।
New Delhi , the 22nd July 2008
S.O. 2030. In pursuance ofsub rule (4) ofrule 10 ofthe Official Language (Use for Official Purposes ofthe Union ) Rules , 1976 , the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices under the Ministry of Human ResourceDevelopment, whose more than 80 % members of the staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi :-
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 1200.00 हेक्टेयर ( लगभग ) या 2964 एकड़ ( लगभग) माप की उक्त भूमि का अर्जन करने और यहां उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में यथाविहित सभी अधिकारों के अपने आशय की सूचना देती हैं । 1. University Grants Commission , Bahadur Shah Jafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002
2.Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya , Mysore , Karnataka- 570026
[No.11011-7/2005 -O.L.U. ] ANITA BHATNAGAR JAIN , Jt . Secy.
टिप्पण 1 : इस अधिसूचना के अधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र के नक्शेसं. ई.सी.एल. /एस.बी.पी./एस.यू.आर.भी./ 2008 /31 तारीख 15 जनवरी , 2008 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर बर्दवान के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता 700001 के कार्यालय में या निदेशक तकनीकी ( संचालन ) , ईस्टर्न कोलफिल्डस लि. सांकतोडिया , डाकघर-डिसरगढ़ , जिला- बर्दवान ( पिन-713333) (प. बंगाल ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता हैं ।
अन्तरिक्ष विभाग बेंगलूर , 23 जुलाई , 2008
टिप्पण 2 : उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है , जिसमें निम्नलिखित उपबन्ध है
" अर्जन के प्रति आक्षेप-
का. आ. 2031.-केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप- नियम 4 के अनुसरण में एतद्वारा अन्तरिक्ष विभाग के उन्नत ऑकड़ा संसाधन अनुसंधान संस्थान ( अड्रिन ) , सिकन्दराबाद को अधिसूचित करती है , जिसके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है ।
[सं. 8/1/7/2008 -हि. ]
8 ( 1 ) कोई व्यक्ति जो किसी भूमि में जिसकी बाबत धारा 7 के अधीन अधिसूचना निकाली गई हैं, हितबद्ध है अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्ही अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के बारे में आक्षेप कर सकेगा ।
के. एस. रामचन्द्र, उप सचिव
DEPARTMENT OF SPACE
Bangalore , the 23rd July , 2008
स्पष्टीकरण- इस धारा के अर्थातर्गत यह आक्षेप नहीं माना जायेगा कि कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन संक्रियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संक्रियाए केन्द्रीय सरकार या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नहीं करनी चाहिए । S.O. 2031. In pursuance of sub rule (4) ofrule 10 ofthe Official Language ( Use for Official Purposes ofthe Union ) Rules , 1976 , the Central Government hereby notifies Advanced Data Processing Research Institute ( ADRIN) , Secunderabad under Department of Space where more than 80 % staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi:
[No.8 /1 /7/2008 -H]
K. S. RAMACHANDRA , Dy. Secy.
कोयला मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 24 जुलाई , 2008
(2) उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन प्रत्येक आक्षेप सक्षम अधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जायेगी और सक्षम अधिकारी आक्षेपकर्ता को स्वयं सुने जाने का या विधि व्यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसे सभी आक्षेपों को सुनने के पश्चात और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जांच यदि कोई हो , करने के पश्चात जो वह आवश्यक समझता है वह या तो धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि के या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़ों या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आक्षेपों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार को उसके विनिश्चय के लिए देगा ।
(3 ) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबद्ध समझा जायेगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होगा यदि भूमि या किसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर दिए जाते हैं ।
का. आ. 2032. केंद्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जरी और भारत के राजपत्र , भाग 2 , खण्ड-3 , उपखंड ( ii ) तारीख ।। मार्च , 2006 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्यांक का. आ. सं. 958 तारीख 27 फरवरी , 2006 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि, जिसका माप 1211.00 हेक्टेयर ( लगभग ) है , कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी ।
टिप्पण 3 : केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता 700 001 को उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियुक्ति किया है । [भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4059
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008 / श्रावण 11 , 1930
अनुसूची
ब्लाक-सोनपुर , रानीगंज कोयला क्षेत्र
जिला-बर्दवान ( पश्चिमी बंगाल)
सभी अधिकार
नक्शा-Drawing No. ECL/SBP/ Surv /2008 /31 तारीख 15 जनवरी , 08
क्रम मौजा/ग्राम
तहसील/ थाना
ग्राम पटवारी हल्का/ सं. जे. एल. संख्याा
सं. का नाम
पांडवेश्वर
1 अनुकूल नहीं है
1. केन्द्रा खोटाडीही
पांडवेश्वर
2 अनुकूल नहीं है 2. बीलपहाड़ी
पांडवेश्वर
4 अनुकूल नहीं है
3. दालूरबांध
पांडवेश्वर
11
4. चक्राला
अनुकूल नहीं है
पांडवेश्वर
12
5. जोआलभांगा
अनुकूल नहीं है
पांडवेश्वर
13 अनुकूल नहीं है
6. भाटमूरा
पांडवेश्वर
14
7. कोनारडीही
अनुकूल नहीं है
पांडवेश्वर
20
8. नवग्राम
अनुकूल नहीं है
पांडवेश्वर
21 अनुकूल नहीं है
9. भालूका
पांडवेश्वर
22 अनुकूल नहींहै
10. सोनपुर
पांडवेश्वर
11. बाजारी
23 अनुकूल नहीं है
पांडवेश्वर
28 अनुकूल नहीं है
12. शंकरपुर
कुल-1200.00 हेक्टेयर ( लगभग ) या 2964 एकड़ ( लगभग )
राजस्व अभिलेख के अनुसार
( 1 ) मौजा केन्द्रा खोटाडीही , अधिकारिता सूची संख्या । , थाना-पांडवेश्वर , जिला- बर्दवान , ( पश्चिमी बंगाल ) के निम्नलिखित प्लाटों को अधिगृहीत करना है ।
2315 ( भाग ) , 2822 ( भाग ) , 3079 ( भाग ) , 3106 (भाग ) , 3125 ( भाग ) , 3126, 3127 , 3129 ( भाग ) , 3130 , 3131,3132 , 3134, 3135 , 3136 , 3137 ( भाग ) , 3138 , 3139 , 3143 ( भाग ) ,
) , 3150 (भाग ) , 3151 ( भाग ) , 3154 , 3144 (भाग ) , 3149 ( भाग
3155 , 3156 , 3157 , 3158 , 3159 , 3160 , 3161 , 3162, 3163 , 3164 , 3165 , 3166 , 3167 , 3168 , 3169 ( भाग ) , 3170 ( भाग ) , 3183 ( भाग ) , 3187 ( भाग ) , 3190 ( भाग ) , 3191 , 3225 ( भाग ) ,
भाग ) , 3229 ( भाग ) , 3231 , 3232 , 3233 , 3226 , 3227, 3228 (
3234, 3235 ( भाग ) , 3237 ( भाग ) , 3238 , 3239 , 3105/3320 (भाग ) , 3127/3322 , 3127/3323 , 3079/3329 , 3190/3762, 3190/3763 , 3190/3764 , 3190/3765 , 3190/3766 , 3190/3767 , 3190/3768 , 3190/3769 , 3079/3787 , 3079/3788 , 3079/3789 .
( 2 ) मौजा बीलपहाड़ी , अधिकारिता सूची संख्या 2 , थाना-पांडवेश्वर , जिला- बर्दवान , ( पश्चिमी बंगाल ) के निम्नलिखित प्लाटों को अधिगृहीत करना है ।
1150 , 1167 ( भाग ) , 1168 ( भाग ) , 1169 , 1149 ( भाग ) ,
1170 , 1172 , 1173 , 1174 , 1175 , 1176 , 1177 , 1178 , 1179 , 1180 , 1181 , 1182 , 1183 , 1184 , 1185 , 1186 ( भाग ) , 1187 ,
टिप्पणियां
क्षेत्र हेक्टयर
जिला (अनुमानतः)
भाग
30.00
बर्दवान
भाग
39.00
बर्दवान
भाग
199.00
बर्दवान
भाग
3.00
बर्दवान
भाग
77.00
बर्दवान
भाग
68.00
बर्दवान
भाग
57.00
बर्दवान
भाग
167.00
बर्दवान
83.12
बर्दवान
भाग
भाग
365.88
बर्दवान
भाग
70.00
बर्दवान
41.00
भाग बर्दवान
1188 , 1189, 1190 , 1191 , 1192, 1193 , 1194 ( भाग ) , 1195 (भाग) , 1217 ( भाग ) , 1219 ( भाग ) , 1220 , 1221 , 1222 , 1223 , 1224 , 1225 , 1226 , 1227 , 1228 , 1229, 1239, 1240, 1241 (भाग) , 1248 , 1249 .
( 3) मौजा दालूरबाँध , अधिकारिता सूची संख्या 4 , थाना- पांडवेश्वर , जिला- बर्दवान , ( पश्चिमी बंगाल ) के निम्नलिखित प्लाटों कोअधिगृहीत करना है ।
956, 957 ( भाग ) , 958 , 959, 960 , 961 , 962 , 963 , 964 , 965, 966 , 967 , 968 , 969 , 970 , 971 , 972, 973 , 974 , 975 , 976, 977 , 978 , 979 , 980 , 981 , 982 , 983 , 984 , 985 , 986 , 987, 988 , 989 , 990 , 991 , 992 , 993 , 994 , 995 , 996 , 997 , 998 , 999 , 1000 , 1001 , 1002 , 1003 , 1004 , 1005 , 1006, 1007, 1008 , 1009 , 1010 , 1011 , 1012 , 1013 , 1014, 1015 , 1016 , 1017 , 1018 , 1019 , 1020 , 1021 , 1022 , 1023 , 1024, 1025 , 1026 , 1027 , 1028 , 1029 , 1030 , 1031 , 1032 , 1033 , 1034 , 1035 , 1036 , 1037 , 1038 , 1039 , 1040, 1041 , 1042 , 1043 , 1044 , 1045 , 1046 , 1047 , 1048 , 1049 , 1050 ,
1055 , 1056 , 1057 , 1058 , 1059 , 1051 , 1052 , 1053 , 1054 ,
1060, 1061 ( भाग ) , 1062 , 1063, 1064 , 1065 , 1066 , 1067 , 1068 , 1069 , 1070 , 1071 , 1072, 1073 , 1074 , 1075 , 1076 , 1077, 1078 , 1079 ( भाग ) , 1080 , 1081 , 1082 , 1083 , 1084 , 4060
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 1085, 1086 , 1087 , 1088 , 1089 , 1090 , 1091 , 1092 , 1093 , 1420/1676, 1420/1677 , 1420/1678 , 1420/1679 , 1607/1680 , 1569/1681 , 1569/1682 , 1616/1683 , 1611/1684 , 1409/1685 , 1409/1686 , 1409/1687 , 1409/1688 , 1409/1689 , 1089/1725 , 1096/1726 , 1096/1727 , 1172/1728 , 1176/1729 , 1176/1730 , 1180/1731 , 1180/1732 , 1180/1733 , 1187/1734 , 1187/1735 , 1187/1736 , 1187/1737 , 1187/ 1738 , , 1188 / 1739 , 1188/1740 , 1364/1826 , 1346/1840 ( भाग ) , 1346/1841 , 1346/1842, 1561/1843 , 1561/1844 , 1561/1845 , 1365/1846 , 1112/1883 , 1112/1884 , 1112/1885 , 112/1886 , 1112/1887 , 1179/1888 , 957/1889 , 957/1890 , 957/1891 , 957/1892 , 957/1893 , 1179/1894 , 1179/1895 , 1112/1912 , 1214/1913 , 1214/1914, 1214/1915 , 1115/1916 , 1641/1936 , 1641/1937 , 1366/2050 , 957/2051 , 1161/2052 , 1161/2053 , 1161/2054 , 957//2055 , 1161/2056 , 1161 // 2057 , 1161/2058 , 957/2059 , 1446/2087 (भाग ) , 1466/2099 , 1619/2112 , 1619/2113 , 1619/2114.
( 4) मौजा चक्राला , अधिकारिता सूची संख्या 11 , थाना-पांडवेश्वर, जिला- बर्दवान , ( पश्चिमी बंगाल ) के निम्नलिखित प्लाटों को अधिगृहीत करना है ।
90 ( भाग) , 156, 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 ( भाग ) , 161 ( भाग ) , 163 ( भाग ) , 176 , 185 ( भाग ) , 186, 187 , 243 ( भाग ) , 641 , 243/647.
( 5 ) मौजा जोहालभाँगा , अधिकारिता सूची संख्या 12 , थाना-पांडवेश्वर , जिला- बर्दवान , ( पश्चिमी बंगाल ) के निम्नलिखित प्लाटों को अधिगृहीत करना है ।
58, 59 , 29/1216 , 639/1219 , 639/1220 , 639/1221 , 639/1222 ,
639/1393,639/1394 , 639/1395 , 639/1396 , 639/1397 , 639/1398, 1238 , 1239 , 1240 , 1241 1247 , 1248 , 1249 , 1250 1094, 1095 , 1096 , 1097, 1098 , 1099 , 1100 , 1101 , 1102 , 1103 , 1104 , 1105 , 1106 , 1107 , 1108 , 1109 , 1110 , 1111 , 1112 , 1113 , 1114 , 1115 , 1116 , 1117 , 1118 , 1119 , 1120 , 1121 , 1122 , 1123 , 1124 , 1125 , 1126 , 1127 , 1128 , 1129 , 1130 , 1131 , 1132, 1133 , 1134 , 1135 , 1136 , 1137 , 1138 , 1139 , 1140 , 1141 , 1142 , 1143 , 1144 , 1145, 1146, 1147 , 1148 , 1149 , 1150 , 1151 , 1152 , 1153 , 154 , 1155 , 1156 , 1157 , 1158 , 1159 , 1160 , 1161 , 1162 , 1163 , 1164 , 1165 , 1166, 1167 , 1168 , 1169 , 1170 , 1171 , 1172 , 1173 , 1174 , 1175 , 1176 , 1177 , 1178 , 1179 , ( भाग ) , 1180, 1181 , 1182, 1183 , 1184 , 1185 , 1186, 1187 , 1188 , 1189 , 1190 , 1191 , 1192, 1193 , 1194 , 1195 , 1196 , 1197 , 1198 , 1199 , 1200 , 1201 ; 1202 , 1203 , 1204 , 1205 , 1206 , 1207 , 1208 , 1209 , 1210 , 1211 , 1212 , 1213 , 1214 , 1215 , 1216 , 1217 , 1218 , 1219 , 1220 , 1221 , 1223. 1224 , 1225 , 1226 , 1227 , 1228 , 1229 , 1230 , 1231 , 1232 , 1233 , 1234 , 1235 , 1236 , 1237 , 1242 , 1243 , 1244 , 1245 , 1246 , 1251 , 1252 , 1253 , 1254 , 1255 , 1256 , 1257 , 1258 , 1259 1260 , 1261 , 1262 , 1263 , 1264 , 1265 , 1266 , 1267 , 1268 , 1269 , 1270 , 1271 , 1272 , 1273 , 1274, 1275 , ( भाग ) , 1276 , 1277 , 1278 , 1279 , 1280 , 1281 , (भाग) , 1283 , 1284, 1285, ( भाग ) , 1286 , ( भाग ) , 1353 , 1354 , 1355 , ( भाग ) , 1356, 1357 , ( भाग ) , 1358 ( भाग ) , 1359 (भाग) , 1360 , 1361 , 1362, 1363 ( भाग ) , 1364 ( भाग ) , 1365 , 1366 , 1367 , 1368 , 1369 , 1370 , 1371 , 1372 , 1373 , 1374 , 1375 , 1376 , 1377, 1378 , 1379 , 1380, 1381 ( भाग ) , 1382 , 1383 , 1384 , 1385 , 1386 , 1387 , 1388 , 1389 , 1390 , 1391 , 1392, 1393 , 1394 , 1395 , 1396 , 1397 , 1398 , 1399 , 1400 , 1401 , 1402 , 1403 , 1404 , 1405 , 1406 , 1407 , 1408 , 1409 , 1410 , 1411 , 1412 , 1413 , 1415 , 1416 , 1417 , 1418 , 1419 , 1420, 1421 , 1422 , 1423 , 1424 , 1425 , 1426 , 1427 , 1428 , 1429 , 1430 , 1431 , 1432 , 1433 , 1434 , 1435 , 1436 , 1437 , 1438 , 1439, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1443 , ( भाग ) , 1444 , 1445,1446, 1447, 1448 , 1449 , 1450 , 1451 , 1452 , 1453 , 1454, 1455 , 1456, 1457 , 1458 , 1459 , 1460 , 1461 , 1462 , 1463 , 1464 , 1465, 1466, ( भाग ) , 1561 1562, 1563 , 1564 , 1565 , 1566 , 1567 , 1568 , 1569 , 1570 , 1571 , 1572 , 1573 , 1574 , 1475 , 1576 , 1577 , 1578 , 1579 , 1580 , 1581 , 1582 , 1583 , 1584 , 1585 , 1586 , 1587, 1588 , 1589 ( भाग ) , 1590 , 1591 , 1592 , 1593 , 1594 , 1595 , 1596 , 1597 , 1598 , 1599 , 1600 , 1601 , 1602 , 1603 , 1604 , 1605 , 1606 , 1607 , 1608 , 1609 , 1610 , 1611 , 1612 , 1613 , 1614 , 1615 , 1616 , 1617 , 1618 , 1619 , 1620 , 1621 , 1622 , 1623 , 1624 , 1625 , 1626 , 1627 , 1628 , 1629, 1630 , 1631 , 1632 , 1633 , 1634 , 1635 , 1636 , 1637 , 1638 , 1639 , 1640 , 1641 , 1642 , 1643 , 1069/1659 , 980/1669 ,
1148/1670 , 1427/1671 , 141871673 , 1418/1674 , 1418/1675 ,
1 ( भाग ) , 2 ( भाग ) , 3 , 4 ( भाग ) , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9, 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14, 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40, 41 , 42, 43, 44 , 45, 46, 47, 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57, 639/1223 ,639/1224 , 639/1225 , 639/1226 , 639/1227 , 639/1228 , 639/1229,639/1230 , 639/1231 , 639/1232 , 639/1233 , 639/1251 , 10/1261, 639/1361 , 639/1362 , 639/1363 , 639/1364 , 639/1365 , 639/1366, 639/1367 , 639/1368 , 639/1369 , 639/1370 , 639/1371 , 639/1372,639/1373 , 639/1374 , 639/1375 , 639/1376 , 639/1377 , 639/1378, 639/1379 , 639/1380 , 639/1381 , 639/1382 , 639/1383 , 639/1384,639/1385 , 639/1386 , 639/1387 , 639/1388 , 639/1391 , 639/1399,639/1401 , 639/1402 , 639/1403 , 639/1404 , 639/1405 . 639/1406,639/1407 , 639/1408 , 639/1410 , 639/1411 , 639/1412, 639/1414 , 639/1415 , 639/1416 , 639/1417 , 639/1418 , 639/1419, 639/1420,639/1421 , 639/1422 , 639/1423 , 639/1424 , 639/1425, 639/1427,639/1429 , 639/1430 , 639/1431 , 639/1432 , 639/1433, 639/1436,639/1437 , 639/1438 ,639/1439 , 639/1442 , 639/1448 , [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
639/1449,639/1450 , 639/1451 , 639/1452, 639/1453 , 639/1454 , 639/1455, 639/1457 ,639/1458 , 639/1460, 639/1461 , 639/1462 , 639/1463, 639/1464, 639/1465 , 639/1466,639/1469 ,639/1470 , 639/1471,639/1472 ,639/1473 ,639/1474, 639/1476 , 639/1477, 639/1478 ,639/1479 , 639/1480 , 639/1481 , 58/1482 , 58/1483, 58/1485 , 58/1486 , 58/1487 , 58/1489 , 57/1490 , 57/1492 , 57/1493 , 57/1494 , 59/1495 , 59/1497 , 59/1498 , 59/1499 , 59/1500 , 59/1501 , 59/1502 , 59/1503 , 59/1504 , 59/1505 , 59/1506 , 59/1508 , 59/1509 , 59/1510 , 59/1511 , 59/1512 , 59/1513 , 59/1514, 59/1515 , 59/1516 , 59/1517 , 59/1518 , 59/1519 , 59/1520 , 59/1521 , 55/1522 , 28/1573 , 14/1604 , 14/1605 , 639/1612 .
(6 ) मौजा भाटमूरा , अधिकारिता सूची संख्या 13 , थाना- पांडवेश्वर, जिला- बर्दवान , ( पश्चिमी बंगाल ) के निम्नलिखित प्लाटों को अधिगृहीत करना है ।
1 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18, 19, 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 94, 95 , 96, 97, 99 , 100, 101 , 102 , 103 , 104, 105 , 106 , 107, 108 , 109 , 110, 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 26/204 , 26/205 , 26/206 , 134/207 , 25/221 , 25/222 , 25/223 , 25/224 , 25/225 , 25/226 , 25/227 , 25/228 , 13/237 , 13/238, 13/239 , 13/240 , 13/241 , 13/242 , 13/243 , 13/244, 8/245 , 8/246, 8/247 , 8/248 , 8/249 , 8/250 , 8/251 , 8/252 , 8/253 , 8/254 , 8/255 , 7/256 , 6/257 , 6/258 , 27/259, 27/260 , 27/261 , 26/262 , 26/263 , 1/264 , 1/265 , 1/266 , 1/267 , 1/268 , 1/269 , 1/270 , 1/271 , 1/272 , 1/273 , 1/274 , 1/275 , 1/276 , 1/277 , 1/278 , 1/279 , 1/280 , 1/281 , 1/282 , 1/283 , 17284 , 1/285 , 1/286 , 1/287 ; 1/288 , 1/289, 1/290, 1/291 , 1/292 , 1/293 , 1/294 , 1/295 , 1/296 , 1/297 , 1/298 , 1/299 , 1/300 , 1/301 , 1/302 , 1/303, 1/304 , 1/305 , 1/306, 1/307 , 1/308 , 1/309, 81/311 , 81/312 , 81/313 , 81/314 , 81/315 , 81/316 , 81/317 , 81/318 , 81/319 , 81/320 , 81/321 , 81/322 , 81/323 , 81/324 , 81/325 , 81/326 , 81/327 , 81/328 , 79/329 , 79/330 , 84/331 , 81/332, 81/333 , 81/334 , 85/335 , 1/342, 1/343 , 1/344 , 1/345 , 1/346, 1/347 , 1/348 , 1/349 , 1/350 , 1/351 , 1/352, 1/353 , 1/354, 1/355 , 1/356 , 1/357 , 1/358 , 1/359 , 1/360 , 1/361 , 1/362, 1/363 , 1/364, 1/365 , 1/366 , 1/367, 1/368 , 1/369 , 1/370 , 1/371 , 1/372 , 1/373 , 1/374 , 1/375 , 1/376 , 1/377 , 1/378 , 1/379 , 1/380, 1/381 , 1/382 , 1/383 , 1/384 , 1/385 , 1/386 , 1/387 , 1/388 , 1/389 , 1/390, 1/391 , 1/392 , 1/393 , 1/394 , 1/395 , 1/396 , 1/397 , 1/398 , 1/399 , 1/400 , 1/401 , 1/402 , 1/403 , 1/404 , 1/405 , 1/406 , 1/407 , 1/408 , 1/409 , 1/410 , 1/411 , 1/412 , 1/413 , 1/414 , 1/415 , 1/416 , 1/417 , 1/418 , 1/419 , 1/420 , 1/421 , 1/422 , 1/423 , 1/424 , 1/425, 1/426 , 1/427, 1/428 , 1/429 , 1/430, 1/431 , 1/432, 1/433 , 1/434, 1/435 , 2745 G1/08-2
4061
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
1 1/436, 1/437 , 1/438 , 1/439 , 1/440 , 1/441 , 1/442 , 1/443 , 1/444, 1/445 , 1/446 , 1/447.
(7 ) मौजा कोनारडीही , अधिकारिता सूची संख्या 14 , थाना-पांडवेश्वर , जिला- बर्दवान , ( पश्चिमी बंगाल ) के निम्नलिखित प्लाटों को अधिगृहीत करना है ।
17, 18, 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29, 30, 31 , 1 , 2, 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12, 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ,, 32, 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ( भाग ) , 45 , 46 , 47, 48 , 49, 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62, 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82, 83 , 84 , 85 , 86, 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 ( भाग ) , 116, 117, 119 (भाग ) , 135, 136, 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142, 143 , 144 , 145, 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152 , 153 , 154 , 155, 156, 157, 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 167 , 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 178 , 180 , 181 , 238 , 242 ( भाग ) , 243, 244, 245 , 246 , 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 256 ( भाग ) , 257 , 258 , 259 , 261 ( भाग ) , 264 ( भाग ) , 19/2980, 247/2981 , 40/2984 , 40/3009 , 40/3010 , 8/3015 , 1/3021 , 3/3022, 5/3023 , 5/3024 , 38/3025 , 38/3026 , 8/3027 , 8/3028 , 4/3029, 42/3030, 136/3035 , 114/3036, 57/3037 , 71/3038 , 71/3039 , 71/3040 , 70/3052 , 70/3053 , 70/3054 , 71/3055 , 259/3058 , 56/3071 .
(8 ) मौजा नवग्राम, अधिकारिता सूची संख्या 20 , थाना- पांडवेश्वर , जिला-बर्दवान , ( पश्चिमी बंगाल ) के निम्नलिखित प्लाटों को अधिगृहीत करना है ।
48, 49 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142, 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 147, 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 ( भाग ) , 152 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 ( भाग ) , 165 , 166 , 167, 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 181 , 182 , 183 , 184 , 185 , 186 , 187 , 188 , 189 , 190, 191 , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195 , 196 , 197 , 198 , 199, 200 , 201 , 202 , 203 , 204 , 205, 206 , 207 , 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226 , 227, 228 , 229, 230 , 231 , 232 , 233 , 234 , 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240, 241, 242 , 243 , 244 , 245 , 246 , 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253, 254 , 255 , 256, 257 , 258 , 259 , 260, 261 , 262, 263 , 264, 265, 266 , 267, 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274, 275 , 276 , 277, 278 , 279 , 280 , 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285 , 286 , 287 , 288 , 289, 290 , 291 , 292 , 293 , 294 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301, 302 , 303 , 304 , 305 , 306 , 307 , 308 , 309,310 , 311 , 312 , 313 , 314 , 315 , 316, 317 , 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 , 322 , 323 , 324 , 325, 326 , 327 , 328 , 329 , 330 , 331 , 332 , 333 , 334 , 335 , 336 , 4062
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 337, 338 , 339, 340, 341 , 342, 343 , 344, 345 , 346 , 347 , 348 , 478/1620, 534/1621 , 733/1622781/1623 , 980/1625 , 1016/1626 , 349, 350, 351 , 352 , 353 , 354 , 355 , 356 , 357, 358 , 359, 360, 135/1628 , 137/1629 , 249/1630 , 327/1631 , 368/1632 , 722/1633 , 361, 362, 363 , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370 , 371,372, 775/1634,484/1637 , 531/1638 , 554/1639 , 727/1640 , 738/1643 , 373 , 374 , 375 , 376, 377 , 378 , 379 , 380 , 381 , 382, 383 , 384, 320/1644, 297/1646, 475/1647 , 728/1648 , 149/1649, 776/1651 , 385, 386, 387, 388 , 389 , 390 , 391 , 392 , 393 , 394 , 395 , 396, 777/1652, 366/1653 , 367/1654 , 918/1655 , 921/1656, 922/1657 , 397, 398 , 399, 400 , 401 , 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408 , 923/1658 , 924/1659 , 926/1660 , 927/1661 , 359/1673 , 409, 410, 411 , 412, 413 , 414 , 415 , 416 , 417 , 418 , 419 , 420, 450/1674,480/1675 , 551/1676 , 557/1677 , 729/1678 , 786/1679 , 421, 422, 423 , 424, 425 , 426, 427 , 428 , 429 , 430, 431 , 432, 524/1682, 240/1685 , 268/1686 , 308/1687 , 437/1688 , 770/1689 , 433, 434, 435,436 , 437, 438 , 439, 440, 441 , 442 , 443 , 444, 614/1692, 298/1693 , 589/1694 , 590/1695 , 611/1698 , 248/1700 , 445,446,447,448 , 449 , 4.50 , 451 , 452, 453 , 454, 455 , 456, 295/1701, 420/1702 , 439/1703 , 553/1704 , 890/1705 , 216/1711 , 457,458 ,459,460, 461 , 462 , 463 , 464 , 465 , 466, 467 , 368, 530/1712, 209/1713 , 430/1714 , 207/1716 , 279/1717 , 448/1718 , 469, 470, 471 , 472 , 473 , 474 , 475 , 476, 477, 478 , 479, 480, 354/1722,460/1723 , 672/1724 , 208/1725 , 307/1726 , 456/1727 , 481,482, 483 , 484, 485 , 486, 487, 488 , 489 , 490, 491 , 492, 673/1728,852/1729 , 343/1734 , 867/1735 , 245/1738 , 444/1739, 493, 494, 495 , 496 , 497 , 498 , 499, 500 , 501 , 502 , 503 , 504 , 479/1740, 758/1743 , 384/1744 , 739/1747 , 750/1748 , 762/1749 , 505 , 506 , 507 , 508 , 509 , 510 , 511 , 512 , 513 , 514 , 515 , 516 , 205/1753, 253/1754 , 296/1755 , 259/1758 , 210/1760 , 426/1762, 517, 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 , 5:22 , 523 , 524 , 525 , 526 , 527 , 528 , 386/1763, 790/1764 , 721/1766 , 747/1768 , 306/1772, 454/1773 , 529 , 530 , 531 , 532 , 533 , 534 , 535 , 536 , 537 , 538 , 539 , 540 , 787/1774, 796/1775 , 910/1776 , 240/1785 , 241/1786, 323/1787, 541, 542 , 543 , 544 , 545 , 546 , 547 , 548 , 549 , 550, 551 , 552 , 323/1788 , 323/1789 , 374/1790 , 438/1791 , 453/1792 , 455/1793 , 553 , 554 , 555 , 556 , 557 , 5:58 , 559 , 560, 561 , 562 , 563 , 564 , 478/1794,481/1795 , 496/1796 , 507/1797, 507/1798 , 510/1799 , 565, 566 , 567 , 568 , 569 , 570 , 571 , 572, 573 , 574 , 575,576 , 650/1801,653/1802 , 653/1803 , 657/1804 , 686/1805 , 686/1806 , 577,578,579,580 , 581 , 582 , 583 , 584, 585 , 586 , 587 , 588 , 733/1807, 733/1808, 748/1809 , 781/1810 , 781 / 1811,881 / 1817 , 589, 590, 591 , 592 , 593 , 593 , 595 , 596, 597 , 598 , 599 , 600 , 881/1818 , 910/1819 , 49/1844 , 49/1845 , 49/1846, 49/1847 , 601, 602, 603 , 604 , 605, 606, 607 , 608 , 609 , 610 , 611 , 612 , 49/1848 , 49/1849 , 49/1850 , 49/1851 , 49/1852 , 49/1853 , 613 , 614, 615 , 616 , 617, 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , 622 , 623 , 49/1854, 49/1855 , 49/1856 , 49/1857 , 49/1858 , 49/1859 , 624 (5) , 637, 638 , 639 , 640 , 641 , 642, 643 , 644, 645, 646, 49/1860 , 49/1861 , 49/1862, 49/1863 , 49/1864 , 49/1865 , 647, 648 , 649 , 650 , 651 , 652 , 653 , 654 , 655 , 656 , 657 , 658 , 49/1866, 49/1867 , 49/1868 , 49/1869 , 49/1870 , 48/1871 , 659, 660, 661 , 662 , 663 , 664 , 665 , 666 , 667 , 668 , 669 , 670 , 59/1872 , 49/1873 , 59/1874 , 59/1875 , 52/1876 , 52/1877 , 671,672,673, 674 , 675, 676, 677, 678 , 679 , 680 , 681 , 682, 59/1878 , 53/1879 , 53/1880 , 53/1881 , 56/1882 , 56/1883 , 683, 684, 685,686, 687, 688 , 689 , 690 , 691 , 692, 693, 694 , 56/1884, 56/1885 , 56/1886 , 56/1887 , 56/1888 , 56/1889 , 695,696, 697 , 698 , 699 , 700 , 701 , 702 , 703 , 704 , 705 , 706 , 56/1890 , 56/1891 , 56/1892 , 56/1893 , 56/1894 , 56/1895 , 707, 708 , 709 , 10 , 711 , 712 , 713 , 714 , 715 , 716 , 717 , 718 , 56/1896 , 56/1897 , 56/1898 , 56/1899 , 56/1900 , 56/1901 , 719 , 720 , 721 , 722 , 723 , 724 , 725 , 726 , 727 , 728 , 729 , 730 , 56/1902, 56/1903 , 56/1904 , 56/1905 , 56/1906 , 56/1907 , 731, 732, 733 , 734 , 735 , 736 , 737 , 738 , 739 , 740 , 741 , 742 , 56/1908 , 56/1909 , 56/1910 , 56/1911 , 56/1912 , 56/1913 , 743,744, 745,746 , 747 , 743 , 749 , 750 , 751 , 752 , 753 , 754 , 56/1914 , 56/1915 , 56/1916 , 56/1917 , 56/1918 , 56/1919 , 755,756,757,758 , 759 , 760, 761 , 762 , 763 , 764 , 765 , 766, 56/1920 , 56/1921 , 56/1922 , 56/1923 , 56/1924 , 56/1925 , 767, 768 , 769 , 770 , 771 , 772 , 773 , 774 , 775 , 776 , 777 , 778 , 56/1926 , 56/1927 , 56/1928 , 56/1929 , 56/1930 , 56/1931 , 779,780 , 781 , 782 , 783 , 784 , 785 , 786, 787,788 , 789 , 790 , 56/1932 , 56/1933 , 56/1934 , 56/1935 , 56/1936 , 56/1937 , 791, 851,852,853 , 854 , 855 , 856 , 857, 871,872 , 873 , 874 , 56/1938 , 56/1939 , 56/1940 , 56/1941 , 56/1942 , 56/1943 , 875,879,880, 881. , 882, 883 , 884, 885 , 886, 887 , 888 , 889 , 57/1944, 57/1945 , 59/1946 , 59/1947 , 59/1948 , 59/1949 , 890,891 , 892, 893 , 894, 895 , 896 , 897, 898 , 899, 900, 901 , 59/1950 , 59/1951 , 59/1952 , 59/1953 , 59/1954 , 59/1955 , 902, 903 , 904 , 905 , 906, 90 , 908 , 909 , 910 , 911,912,913 , 59/1956 , 59/1957 , 59/1958 , 59/1959 , 59/1960 , 59/1961 , 914, 915 , 916 , 917, 918 , 919 ( भाग ) , 920 , 921 ( भाग ) , 922 , 61/1962, 61/1963 , 61/1964 , 61/1965 , 61/1966 , 61/1967 , 923, 924, 925 ( भाग ) , 926 , 927, 929 , 975 , 976 , 977 , 978 , 61/1968 , 61/1971 , 61/1972 , 61/1973 , 59/1974 , 59/1975 , 979, 980 ( भाग ) , 1014 , 1016, 1017 , 1018 , 1019 , 1020 , 1021 , 59/1976 , 59/1977 , 59/1978 , 59/1979 , 59/1980 , 59/1981 , 1022, 1023 , 1024 , 1025 , 1026, 1027 , 1028 , 1029 , 1030 , 59/1982, 59/1983 , 59/1984 , 59/1985 , 59/1986 , 59/1987 , 1031, 194/1604 , 144/1605 , 449/1606 , 404/1608 , 49/1611 , 59/1988 , 59/1989 , 59/1990 , 59/1991 , 59/1992 , 59/1993 , 49/1612, 49/1613 , 789/1614 , 873/1615 , 313/1618 , 323/1619, 59/1994 , 59/1995 , 59/1996 , 59/1997 , 59/1998 , 59/1999 , [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
59/2000, 59/2001 ( भाग ) , 59/2003, 59/2004, 61/2026 , 61/2032, 61/2033 , ( भाग ) , 180/2277 , 180/2278 , 180/2279 , 180/2280 , 180/2281,180 /2282 ( भाग ) , 59/2287 , 59/2288 , 61/2289 , 8/2291 , 255/2300 , 309/23.1 , 310/2302 , 440/2303 , 490/2304 , 490/2305 , 490/2306 , 586/2307 , 586/2308 , 789/2315 , 789/2316 , 789/2317 , 876/2318 , 59/2324 , 311/2340 , 181/2341 , 181/2342 , 251/22345 , 59/2347 ,
( 9 ) मौजा भालूका , अधिकारिता सूची संख्या 21 , थाना-पांडवेश्वर, जिला- बर्दवान , ( पश्चिमी बंगाल ) के निम्नलिखित प्लाटों को अधिगृहीत करना है ।
1 , 2, 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17, 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32, 33 , 34, 35, 36, 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 85 , 87 , 88 , 89, 90, 91 , 92 , 93 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99, 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104, 105 , 106 , 107, 108 , 109 , 110, 111 , 112, 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117, 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140, 141 , 142 , 143 , 144, 145 , 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152, 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165, 166 , 167, 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 , 182 , 183 , 184 , 185 , 186, 187, 188 , 189 , 190, 191 , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195 , 196 , 197 , 198 , 199, 200 , 201 , 202 , 203 , 204 , 205 , 206 , 207 , 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212, 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226, 227 , 228 , 229 , 230 , 231 , 232, 233 , 234 , 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276 , 283 , 284 , 285 , 286 , 287 , 288 , 289 , 290 , 291, 292 , 293 , 294 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302 , 303 , 304 , 305 , 306 , 307, 308 , 309,310 , 311 , 312 , 313 , 314 , 315 , 316 , 317 , 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 , 322 , 323 , 324 , 325 , 326, 327, 328 , 329 , 330 , 331 , 332 , 333 , 334, 335 , 336, 337 , 338 , '339 , 340 , 341 , 342 , 343 , 344 , 345 , 346 , 347 , 348 , 349 , 350 , 351,352 , 353 , 354, 355 , 356, 357 , 358 , 359 , 360 , 361 , 362, 363 , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372 , 373 , 374 , 375, 376 , 377 , 378 , 379 , 380 , 381 , 382 , 383 , 384, 385 , 386 , 387, 388 , 389 , 390 , 391 , 392 , 393 , 394 , 395 , 396 , 397, 398 , 399, 400 , 401 , 402 , 403 , 404 , 405 , 406 , 407 , 408 , 409 , 410, 411 , 412 , 413 , 414 , 415 , 416 , 417 , 418 , 419 , 420 , 421 , 422 , 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428 , 429 , 430 , 431 , 432 , 433 , 434 , 435, 436, 437 , 438 , 439 , 440, 441 , 443 , 444, 445 , 446, 447, (10 ) मौजा सोनपुर, अधिकारिता सूची संख्या 22 , थाना- पांडवेश्वर , जिला- बर्दवान , ( पश्चिमी बंगाल ) के निम्नलिखित प्लाटों को अधिगृहीत करना है ।
1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16, 17, 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26, 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ,
4063
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
32, 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45, 46, 47, 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56, 57, 58 , 59, 60 , 61 , 62, 63 , 64 , 65 , 66, 67, 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77, 78 , 79, 80, 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85, 86 , 87, 88, 89 , 90 , 91 , 92, 93 , 94, 95 , 96, 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105, 106, 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116, 117, 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129, 130, 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140, 141 , 142, 143 , 144, 145 , 146 , 147, 148 , 149, 150 , 151 , 152, 153 , 154 , 155 , 156, 157, 158 , 159, 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164, 165 , 166, 167, 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180, 181,188 , 196 , 199 , 200, 201 , 202 , 204, 205, 206 , 207, 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216, 217 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226 , 227 , 228 , 229 , 230 , 231 , 232 , 233 , 234 , 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240, 241 , 242 , 243 , 244 , 245 , 246 , 247, 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252, 253 , 254 , 255 , 256 , 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264, 265, 266 , 267 , 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276, 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 , 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285 , 286 , 287 , 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292 , 293 , 294 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300, 301 , 302 , 303 , 304 , 305 , 306, 307 , 308 , 309,310,311 , 312, 313 , 314 , 315 , 316 , 317 , 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 , 322 , 323 , 324, 325 , 326 , 327 , 328 , 329 , 330 , 331 , 332 , 333 , 334 , 335 , 336, 337 , 338 , 339 , 340 , 341 , 342 , 343 , 344 , 345 , 346 , 347 , 348 , 349 , 350 , 351 , 352, 353 , 354 , 355 , 356 , 357 , 358 , 359 , 360, 361 , 362 , 363 , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372,373 , 374 , 375 , 376 , 377 , 378 , 379 , 380 , 381 , 382 , 383 , 384,385,386 , 387, 388 , 389 , 390 , 391 , 392 , 393 , 394 , 395 , 396, 397 , 398 , 399 , 400, 401 , 402 , 403 , 404 , 405 , 406 , 407, 408, 409, 410, 411 , 412 , 413 , 414 , 415 , 416 , 417 , 418 , 419 , 420, 421 , 422 , 423 , 424 , 425 , 426 , 427 , 428 , 429 , 430.431 , 432, 433 , 434 , 435 , 436 , 437 , 438 , 439 , 440, 441 , 442 , 443 , 444,445, 446,447 , 448 , 449 , 450 , 451 , 452 , 453 , 454 , 455 , 456, 457, 458 , 459 , 460 , 461 , 462 , 463 , 464, 465 , 466 , 467, 468, 469, 470 , 471 , 472 , 473 , 474 , 475 , 476 , 477 , 478 , 479 , 480, 481 , 482 , 483 , 484 , 485 , 486 , 487 , 488 , 489, 490, 491 , 492, 493 , 494 , 495 , 496, 497 , 498 , 499 , 500 , 501 , 502 , 503 , 504 , 505 , 506 , 507 , 508 , 509 , 510 , 511 , 512 , 513 , 514 , 515 , 516 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 , 522 , 523 , 524 , 525 , 526 , 527 , 528 , 529 , 530 , 531 , 532 , 533 , 534 , 535 , 536 , 537 , 538 , 539 , 540, 541 , 542 , 543 , 544 , 545 , 546 , 547 , 548 , 549 , 550 , 551 , 552, 553 , 554 , 555 , 556 , 557 , 558 , 559 , 560 , 561,562 , 563 , 564, 565 , 566 , 567 , 568 , 569 , 570 , 571 , 572 , 573 , 574,575 , 576, 577 , 578 , 579 , 580 , 581 , 582 , 583 , 584 , 585 , 586 , 587 , 588 , 589 , 590 , 591 , 592 , 593 , 594 , 595 , 596 , 597 , 598 , 599 , 600, 601 , 602 , 603 , 604 , 605 , 606 , 607 , 608 , 609 , 610 , 611 , 612 , 613,614 , 615 , 616 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , 622 , 623 , 624, 625 , 626 , 627 , 628 , 629 , 630 , 631 , 632 , 633 , 634 , 635 , 4064
[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
1190 , 1191 , 1192 , 1193 , 1194 , 1195 , 1196 , 1197 , 1198 ,
1199, 1200 , 1201 , 1202 , 1203 , 1204 , 1205 , 1206 , 1207 ,
1208 , 1209 , 1210 , 1211 , 1212 , 1213 , 1214 , 1215 , 1216 ,
1217 , 1218 , 1219 , 1220 , 1221 , 1222 , 1223 , 1224 , 1225 ,
1226 , 1227 , 1228 , 1229 , 1230 , 1231 , 1232 , 1233 , 1234 ,
1235 , 1236, 1237 , 1238 , 1239 , 1240 , 1241 , 1242 , 1243 ,
1244, 1245 , 1246 , 1247 , 1248 , 1249 , 1250 , 1251 , 1252 ,
1253 , 1254 , 1255 , 1256 , 1257 , 1258 , 1259 , 1260 , 1261 ,
1262, 1263 , 1264, 1265 , 1266 , 1267 , 1268 , 1269 , 1270 ,
1271 , 1272 , 1273 , 1274 , 1275 , 1276 , 1277 , 1278 , 1279 ,
1280 , 1281 , 1282 , 1283 , 1284 , 1285 , 1286 , 1287 , 1288 ,
1309 , 1310 , 1311 , 1312 , 1313,1314 , 1315 , 1316 , 1317 ,
1318 , 1319 , 1320 , 1321 , 1322 , 1323 , 1324 , 1325 , 1326 ,
1327 , 1331 , 1332 , 1333 , 1334 , 1335 , 1336 , 1337 , 1338 ,
1339 , 1340 , 1341 , 1342 , 1343 , 1344 , 1345 , 1346 , 1347 ,
1348 , 1349 , 1353 ( भाग ) , 1354 , 1355 , 1356 , 1357 , 1358 ,
1289 , 1290 , 1291 , 1292 , 1293 , 1294 , 1295 , 1296 , 1297 , 1298 , 1299 , 1300 , 1301 , 1302 , 1303 , 1304 , 1306 , 1308 , 1359 , 1360 , 1361 , 1362 , 1363 , 1364 , 1365 , 1415 , 1416 , 871/1524, 843/1526 , 748/1528 , 386/1529 , 768/1530 , 768/1531 , 5/1532, 8/1533 , 35/1534 , 662/1535 , 708/1536 , 715/1537 , 740/1538 , 741/1539 , 743/1540 , 747/1541 , 745/1542 , 742/1543 , 808/1544 , 903/1546 , 1128/1547 , 1150/1548 , 1213/1549 , 432/1550 , 844/1558 , 845/1559 , 261/1561 , 261/1562 , 419/1563 , 262/1564 , 262/1565 , 82/1566 , 378/1567, 971/ 1568,976/1569 , 982/1570 , 921/1571 , 1177/1572 , 1402/1578 , 1436/1580 , 1457/1583, 845/1607 , 845/1608 , 845/1609 , 845/1610 , 845/1611 , 1133/1612 , 616/1613 , 1105/1614 , 1105/1615 , 1105/1616 .
( 11 ) मौंजा बाजारी , अधिकारिता सूची संख्या 23 , थाना-पांडवेश्वर, जिला-बर्दवान , ( पश्चिमी बंगाल ) के निम्नलिखित प्लाटों को अधिगृहीत करना है ।
1126 , 1127 , 1128 , 1129 , 1130 , 1131 , 1133 , 1134 , 1135 ,
636,637,68,639 , 640 , 641 , 642 , 643 , 644 , 645 , 646, 647, 548 , 649, 650 , 651 , 652 , 653 , 654 , 655 , 656, 657 , 658 , 659, 660 , 661 , 662, 663 , 664, 665 , 666 , 667 , 668 , 669 , 670, 671 , 672 , 673 , 674, 675 , 676, 677 , 678. 679, 680 , 681,682, 683,684, 685 , 686 , 687, 688 , 689,694,692, 693,694, 695, 696, 697 , 698 , 699 , 700 , 701 , 702 , 703 , 704 , 705 , 706 , 707, 708 , 709 , 710 , 711 , 712 , 713 , 714 , 715 , 710 , 717 , 718 , 719 , 720 , 721 , 722 , 723 , 724 , 725 , 726 , 727 , 728 , 729 , 730 , 731 , 732 , 733 , 734 , 735 , 736, 737 , 738 , 739 , 740 , 141 , 742 , 743, 744 , 745 , 746 , 747 , 748 , 749 , 750 , 751 , 752 , 753 , 754 , 755,756, 757,758 , 759 , 760 , 761 , 762 , 763 , 764 , 765 , 766 , 767, 768 , 769 , 770 , 771 , 772 , 773 , 774 , 775 , 776 , 777 , 778 , 779 , 780, 781 , 782 , 78.3 , 784 , 785 , 786 , 787 , 788 , 789, 790 , 791 , 792, 793 , 794, 79.5 , 796, 797 , 798 , 799 , 800 , 801 , 802, 803 , 804 , 805 , 806 , 807 , 808 , 809 , 810 , 811 , 812,813,844 (भाग) , 845 , 846,847 , 848 , 849 , 850 , 851 , 852 , 853 , 854 , 855 , 856, 857,858 , 859 , 861 , 862, 863 , 864 , 865 , 866, 867 , 868 , 869 , 870 , 871 , 872 , 873 , 874 , 875 , 876 , 877 , 878 , 879,880,881,882 , 883 , 884 , 885, 886 , 887 , 888 , 889 , 890 , 891, 892, 893 , 894, 89.5 , 896, 897 , 898 , 899 , 900 , 901 , 902 , 903, 904, 905, 906 , 907 , 908 , 909, 910 , 911 , 912 , 913 , 914 , 915, 916 , 917 , 918,919 920 , 921 922 , 923 , 924,925 926, 927, 928 , 929 , 930 , 931 , 932 , 933 , 934 , 935, 936 , 937 , 938 , 939, 941 , 942, 943 , 944 , 945 , 946, 947 , 948 , 949 , 950 , 951 , 952, 953 , 954 , 955 , 956 , 957 , 958 , 959 , 960 , 961 , 962 , 963 , 964,965,966 , 967 , 963 , 969 , 970 , 971 , 972, 973 , 974 , 975 , 976,977 , 978 , 979 , 980 , 981 , 982 , 983 , 984 , 985 , 986 , 987 , 988 , 989 , 990 , 991 , 992 , 993 , 994 , 995 , 996 , 997 , 998 , 999 , 1000 , 1001 , 1002 , 1003 , 1004 , 1005 , 1006 , 1007 , 1008 , 1009 , 1010 , 1011 , 1012 , 1013 , 1014 , 1015 , 1016 , 1017 , 1018 , 1019 , 1020 , 1021 , 1022 , 1023 , 1024 , 1025 , 1026 , 027 , 1028 , 1029 , 1030 , 1031 , 1032 , 1033 , 1034 , 1035 , 1035 , 1037 , 1038 , 1039 , 1040 , 1041 , 1042 , 1043 , 1044 , 1045 , 1046 , 1047 , 1048 , 1049 , 1050 , 1051 , 1052 , 1053 , 1054 , 1055 , 1056 , 10:57 , 1058 , 1059 , 1060 , 1061 , 1062 , 1063 , 1064 , 1065 , 1066 , 1067 , 1068 , 1069 , 1070 , 1071 , 1072 , 1073 , 1074 , 1075 , 1076 , 1077 , 1078 , 1079 , 1080 , 1081 , 1082 , 1083 , 1084 , 1085 , 1086 , 1103 , 1104 , 1105 , 1106 , 1107 , 1109 , 1110 , 1111 , 1112 , 1113 , 1114 , 1115 , 1116 , 1117,1118 , 1119 , 1120 , 1121 , 1122 , 1123 , 1124 , 1125 , 1136 , 1137 , 1138 , 1139 , 1140 , 1141 , 1142 , 1143 , 1144 , 1145 , 1146 , 1147 , 1148 , 1149 , 1150 , 1151 , 1152 , 1153 , 1154, 1155 , 1156 , 157 , 1158 , 1159 , 1160 , 1161 , 1162,
1163 , 1164 , 1165 , 1166 , 1167 , 1168 , 1169 , 1170 , 1171 ,
1172 , 1173 , 1174 , 1175 , 1176 , 1177 , 1178 , 1179 , 1180 ,
3 ( भाग ) , 30 ( भाग ) , 31 , 32 ( भाग ) , 33 , 34 ( भाग ) , 35, 36 ( भाग ) , 37 ( भाग ) , 38 ( भाग ) , 39 , 40 ( भाग ) , 41 ( भाग ) , 42 (भाग ) , 43 ( भाग ) , 44, 45 ( भाग ) , 46 , 47 ( भाग ) , 53 ( भाग ) , 64 ( भाग ) , 68 ( भाग ) , 69 , 70 ( भाग ) , 71 ( भांग ) , 72 ( भाग ) , 73 (भाग ) , 74 ( भाग ) , 75 ( भाग ) , 76 ( भाग ) , 77 ( भाग ) , 79 (भाग ) , 156 , 157 ( भाग ) , 167 ( भाग ) , 168, 169 ( भाग ) , 170 (भाग ) , 171 ( भाग ) , 172 ( भाग ) , 174 ( भाग ) , 177 ( भाग ) , 178 , 179, 180 , 385 ( भाग ) , 386 ( भाग ) , 412 , ( भाग) 413 , 414, 415 , 422, 432 , 433 , 434 , ( भाग ) , 435, 436 , 437 ( भाग ) , 438 (भाग ) , 442 ( भाग ) , 443 , 444 ( भाग ) , 445 , 446, 447 , 448 , 449, 450 , 451,452 , 453 , 454 , 455 , 456 , 457 , 458 , 459 , 460 , 461, 462, 463 , 464 , 465 , 466 , 467 , 368 , 469 , 470 , 471 , 472, 473, 474, 475, 476 , 477 , 478 , 479 , 480 , 481 , 482 , 483 , 484 , 485, 486, 487 , 488 , 489 , 490 , 491 , 492 , 493 , 494, 495 , 496 , 497, 498 , 499 , 500 , 501 , 502 , 503 , 504 , 505 , 506 , 507 , 508 , 1181 , 1182 , 1183 , 1184 , 1185 , 1186 , 1187 , 1188 , 1189 , 4065
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
973, 974, 975 , 976, 977 , 978 , 979 , 980 , 981 , 982 , 983 , 984 ,
1049 , 1050 , 1051 , 1052 , 1053 , 1054 , 1055 , 1056 , 1057 ,
1058 , 1059 , 1060 , 1061 , 1062 , 1063 , 1064 , 1065 , 1066 ,
1067 , 1068 , 1069 , 1070 , 1071 , 1072 , 1073 , 1074 , 1075 ,
1076 , 1077 , 1078 , 1079 , 1080 , 1081 , 1082 , 1083 , 1084 ,
1085, 1086 , 11087 , 1088 , 1089 , 1090 , 1091 , 1092, 1093 ,
1094 , 1095 , 1096 , 1206 ( भाग ) , 1213 , 1214 , 1215 , 1216 ,
1217 , 1218 , 1219 , 1220 , 1221 , 1222 , 1223 , 1224 , 1225 ,
1226 , 1227 , 1228 , 1229 , 1230 , 1231 , ( भाग ) , 671/1268 ,
949, 950, 951 , 952, 953 , 954 , 955, 956, 957, 958 , 959, 960 , 961, 962, 963 , 964, 965 , 966 , 967 , 968 , 969 , 970 , 971 , 972 , 985 , 986, 987 , 988 , 989 , 990 , 991 , 992 , 993 , 994 , 995 , 996 , 997 , 998 , 999 , 1000 , 1001 , 1002 , 1003 , 1004 , 1005 , 1006 , 1007 , 1008 , 1009 , 1010, 1011 , 2012 , 1013 , 1014, 1015 , 1016 , 1017 , 1018 , 1019 , 1020 , 1021 , 1025 ( भाग ) , 1029 , 1031 ( भाग ) , 1032 , 1033 , 1034 , 1035 , 1036 , 1037 , 1038 , 1039 , 1040 , 1041 , 1042 , 1043 , 1044 , 1045 , 1046 , 1048 , 673/1269 , 677/1270,681/1271 , 687/1272 , 687/1273 , 936/1274 , 791/1275,874/1277 , 1086/1362 , 1246/1379 ( भाग ).
सीमा विवरण
(अ.सू.- अधिकारिता सूची )
प्लान प्लेट - ए
509, 510 , 511 , 512 , 513 , 514 , 515 , 516, 517 , 518 , 519, 520, 521 , 522 , 523 , 524 , 525 , 526 , 527 , 528 , 529 , 530 , 531 , 532 , 533, 534, 535 , 536 , 537 , 538 , 539 , 540 , 541 , 544 , 545 , 546, 547, 548 , 549 , 550 , 551 , 552, 553 , 554 , 555 , 556, 557 , 558 , 559, 560 , 561 , 562, 563 , 564, 565 , 566, 567 , 568 , 569 , 570, 571, 572 , 573 , 574, 575 , 576 , 577 , 578 , 579, 580 , 581 , 582 (भाग ) , 583 ( भाग ) , 589 ( भाग ) , 590 ( भाग ) , 591 , 592, 593 , 594, 595 , 596 , 597 , 598 , 599 , 600 , 601 , 602 , 603 , 604 , 605, 606, 607 , 608 , 609, 610, 611 , 612 , 613 , 614 , 615 , 616 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , 622 , 623 , 624 , 625 , 626 , 627, 629, 630 , 631, 632, 633 , 634 , 636, 637 , 645, 646 , 664 , 665 , 666, 667 , 669 , 670 , 671 , 672 , 673 , 674 ( भाग ) , 675 , 676, 677,678, 679 , 680 , 681 ( भाग ) , 682 ( भाग ) , 684 ( भाग ) , 685 (भाग ) , 1446, 58/1785 ( भाग ) , 3/1808 , 434/1809 , 434/1810 , 434/1811 , 489/1813 ,489/1814 , 489/1815 , 560/1818 , 639/1819, 639/1820, 639/1821 , 639/1822 , 536/1823 , 536/1824, 536/1825 , 536/1826 , 536/1827, 536/1828 , 536/1829 , 536/1830 , 525/1831 , 524/1832 , 524/1833 , 524/1834 , 524/1835 , 524/1836, 491/1837 , 491/1838 , 491/1839,491/1840 , 492/1841 , 508/1842 , 50871843 , 505/1844, 505/1845, 502/1846 , 502/1847 , 500/1848 , 501/1849 , 501/1850 , 501/1851 , 501/1852 , 501/1853 , 501/1854 , 501/1855 , 501/1856 , 501/1857 , 501/1858 , 501/1859 , 3/1860 , 489/1861 , 3/1863 , 475/1864, 434/21865 , 434/1866 (भाग ) , 578/1874, 501/1875 , 501/1876.
ए 1 - ए 2 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए । , मौजा केन्द्रा खोट्टाडी, अ.सू. सं. । के प्लाट नं. 3320 के उत्तर- पश्चिमी रेखा से शुरू होती है और , प्लाट 3020 के उत्तरी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 3320 , 12 ) मौजा शंकरपुर , अधिकारिता सूची संख्या 28 , थाना-पांडवेश्वर , जिला- बर्दवान , ( पश्चिमी बंगाल ) के निम्नलिखित प्लाटों को अधिगृहीत करना है
645 ,
3106, 3125 के मध्य से, प्लाट नं. 3126 के उत्तरी रेखा प्लाट नं. 3128 , 3122 के मध्य, प्लाट नं. 3139 के उत्तरी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 3137 के मध्य, प्लाट नं. 3152 , 3153 के उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 3153 , 3154 , 3150 के पश्चिमी रेखा प्लाट नं. 3150 , 3149 के मध्य , प्लाट नं. 3158 , 3165 के उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 3143 , 2315 के मध्य,
875,876 ,
887,888 ,
प्लाट नं. 3168 के उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 3169, 3170 , 3187, 3183 , 2822 , 3190 , के मध्य, प्लाट नं. 3225, 3228, 3229 , 3231 के उत्तरी रेखा , मौजा केन्द्रा खोट्टाडी, अ.सू. सं. । के प्लाट नं. 3235 , 3237 के मध्य और मौजा केन्द्रा खोट्टाडी , अ.सू. सं. । एवं मौजा- बिलपहाडी, अ.सू. नं. 2 के साझा सीमा से गुजरती हैं और प्लाट नं. 1149 , 1167 , 1168 , 1195 , 1194 के मध्य , प्लाट नं. 1193 , 1191 , 1190 , 1189 , 1188 के उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 1219 , 1186 के मध्य , प्लाट नं. 1239 के उत्तरी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 1241 , 1186 के मध्य से गुजरती हुई मौजा- बिलपहाडी, अ.सू. सं. 2 के प्लाट नं. 1186 के पूर्वी रेखा के मध्य बिन्दु ए 2 पर मिलती हैं जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है । 489 , 490 , 611 , 612 , 614 , 615 , 616 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620, 621 , 622 , 625 , 626 , 627 , 628 , 629 , 630 , 631 , 632 , 633, 634, 635 , 636 , 637 , 638 , 639 , 640 , 641 , 642 , 643 , 644, 646, 647 , 648 , 649 , 650 , 651 , 652 , 653 , 654 , 655 , 656, 657 , 658, 659 , 660 , 661 , 662, 663 , 664 , 665 , 666 , 667 , 668 , 669 , 670, 671 , 672 , 673 , 674 , 675 , 676 , 677, 678 , 679 , 680 , 681 , 682, 683,684, 685, 686 , 687 , 688 , 689 , 690 , 691 , 692, 693 , 694, 695 , 696 ,697 , 698 , 699 , 700 , 701 , 703 , 709 , 710 , 711 , 712, 713 , 714 , 715 , 716 , 774 , 780 , 781 , 282 , 783 , 784, 785, 786 , 787 , 788 , 789 , 790 , 791 , 792 , 793 , 794 , 795 , 796, 797 , 798 , 799 , 800 , 801 , 802 , 803 , 804 , 805 , 806 , 807 , 808 , 809 , 810 ( भाग ) , 817 , 818 , 819 , 820 , 859 , 860 , 861 , 862 , 863 , 864,865 , 867,868 , 869 , 870 , 871 , 872 , 873 , 874 , 877, 878 , 879 , 880 , 881 , 882 , 883 , 884 , 885 , 886 , 889 , 890,891 , 892 , 893 , 894, 895 , 896 , 897 , 898 , 899 , 900 , 901 , 902, 903 , 904, 905 , 906, 907 , 908 , 909, 910 , 911,912 , 913, 914 , 915 , 916 , 917, 918 , 919, 920 , 921 , 922 , 923 , 924 , 925, 926 , 927 , 928 , 929 , 930 , 931 , 932, 933 , 934 , 935 , 936 , 937, 938 , 939 , 940 , 941 , 942 , 943 , 944 , 945 , 946 , 947 , 948 , 4066
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
ए 2 -ए 3 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 2 , मौजा- बिलपहाडी , अ.सू. सं. 2 के प्लाट नं.1186 के पूर्वी रेखा के मध्य से शुरू होती हुई मौजा-बिलपहाडी, अ.सू. सं. 2 के प्लाट नं.1186 के पूर्वी रेखा से मौजा- दालुरबाँध , अ.सू. सं. 4 के प्लाट नं. 956 के पूर्वी रेखा से गुजरती हुई मौजा - दालुरबाँध , अ.सू. सं. 4 के प्लाट नं. 956 के दक्षिण पूर्व बिन्दु ए 3 पर मिलती है जैसा कि 'प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
ए 3 - ए 4 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 3 , मौजा- दालुरबाँध , अ.सू. सं. 4 के प्लाट नं. 956 के दक्षिण पूर्व से शुरू होती हुई प्लाट नं. 957 के उत्तरी रेखा एवं मध्य से , प्लाट नं. 982 के उत्तरी रेखा से , प्लाट नं. 957 , 1161 , 1179 के मध्य से गुजरती हुई भौजा- दालुरबांध , अ.सू. सं. 4 के प्लाट नं. 1179के उत्तर पूर्व बिन्दु ए 4 ( प्लेट नं. ए और प्लेट नं. बी के सामान्य बिन्दु) पर मिलती है जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
प्लान प्लेट-बी
ए 4 - ए 5 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 4 ( प्लेट नं. ए और प्लेट नं. बी के सामान्य बिन्दु) , मौजा- दालुरबाँध , अ.सू. सं. 4 के प्लाट नं.1179 के उत्तर पूर्व बिन्दु से शुरू होती हुई प्लाट नं. 1182 , 1191 , 1192 , 1193 के उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 1285 , 1286 के मध्य , प्लाट नं. 1286 के पूर्वी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 1283 के उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 1281 , 1353 , 1355 , 1355 , 1358 , 1359 , 1363 , 1364 , 1840 के मध्य से गुजरती हुई मौजा दालुरबाँध , अ.सू. सं. 4 के प्लाट नं. 1840 के उत्तर पूर्व बिन्दु ए 5 पर मिलती है जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] चक्राला , अ.सू. नं. 11 के प्लाट नं. 63 की पश्चिमी रेखा मौजा- चक्राला , अ.सू. नं. 11 और मौजा ज्वालभाँगा , अ. सू. नं. 12 की साझा सीमा , प्लाट नं. 1 , 2 , के मध्य, प्लाट नं. 3 की पूर्वी रेखा से गुजरते हुए मौजा- ज्वालभाँगा , अ. सू. नं. 12 के प्लाट नं. 3 के दक्षिण पूर्वी बिन्दु ए 8 पर मिलती हैं जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
6 ए 8 - ए 9 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 8 , मौजा ज्वालभाँगा , अ. सू. नं. 12 के प्लाट नं. 3 के दक्षिण पूर्वी बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट नं. 4 के मध्य, से गजुरते हुए मौजा ज्वालभांगा , अ. सू. नं. 12 के प्लाट नं. 4 के उत्तर पूर्वी बिन्दु ए 9 पर आकर मिलती हैं , जैसा कि प्लाने में दर्शाया गया है ।
ए 9 - ए 10 यह रेखा बिन्दु 9 , मौजा ज्वालभाँगा , अ.सू. नं. 12 के प्लाट नं. 4 के उत्तर पूर्वी बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट नं. 9 , 1261 , 10 , 22 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 1573 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 1497, 1498 , 1499 , 1500 , 1501 , 1502, 1251 , 1463 , 1219 , 1612 , मौजा ज्वालाभाँगा , अ. सू. नं. 12 के पूर्वी रेखा, और भटमुरा , अ. सू. नं. 13 एवं मौजा- ज्वालाभांगा , की साझी सीमा रेखा, प्लाट नं. 31 , 28 , 259 , 260 , 79 , 80 , 330 , 86 , 87 , 91 , 93 , 95 , 96, 97 , 122 , 126 , 127 , 134 , की पूर्वी रेखा से गुजरते हुए बिन्दु ए 10 , मौजा- भटमुरा अ. सू. नं. 13 के प्लाट नं. 134 के दक्षिण पश्चिमी बिन्दु पर आकर मिलती है जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
ए 10-ए
11
ए 5 - ए 6 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 5 मौजा- दालुरबाँध , अ.सू. सं. 4 के प्लाट नं. 1840 के उत्तर पूर्व बिन्दु से शुरू होती हुई प्लाट नं. 1840 , 1826 के पूर्वी रेखा से गुजरती हुई मौजा-दालुरबाँध , अ.सू. सं. 4 के प्लाट नं. 1826 के दक्षिण पूर्व ब्न्दुि ए 6 पर मिलती हैं जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
ए 6 - ए 7 यह यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 6 मौजा- दालुरबाँध , अ.सू. सं. 4 के प्लाट नं. 1825 के दक्षिण पूर्व बिन्दु से शुरू होती हुई प्लाट नं. 138 , 1466 के मध्य , प्लाट नं. 1444 के उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 1443 के मध्य , प्लाट नं. 1561 , 1844 , 1562 के उत्तरी रेखा , मौजा- दालुरबाँध , अ.सू. सं. 4 के प्लाट नं. 1466 , 2087 , 1466, 1589 के मध्य और मौजा-दालुरबाँध , अ.सू. सं. 4 एवं मौजा चक्राला अ.सू. सं. 11 के साझा सीमा रेखा से होती हुई , मौजा-चक्राला अ.सू. 11 के 'प्लाट नं. 90 के मध्य बिन्दु, प्लाट नं. 90 , 185, 163 , 163 , 161 , 160 के मध्य बिन्दु , प्लाट नं. 157 , 158 के पूर्वी रेखा से गुजरती हुई मौजा चक्राला अ.सू. नं. 11 के प्लाट नं. 158 के उत्तर पूर्व बिन्दु ए 7 पर मिलती हैं जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है । ए 7 - ए 8 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 7 , मौजा चक्राला , अ.सू. नं. 11 के प्लाट नं. 158 के उत्तर पूर्व बिन्दु से शुरू होकर मौजा- यह रेखा बिन्दु 10 , मौजा- भटमुरा अ. सू. नं. 13 के प्लाट नं. 134 के दक्षिण पश्चिमी बिन्दु से शुरू होकर मौजा भटमुरा अ. सू. नं. 13 और मौजा - कोनारडीह अ.सू. नं. 14 की साझी सीमा रेखा, प्लाट नं. 36 , 39 , 3010 , 41 की दक्षिणी रेखा मौजा- कोनारडीह अ.सू. नं. 14 , प्लाट नं. 42 के मध्य, प्लाट नं. 3030 के दक्षिणी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 3030 के पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 46, 45 , 117 के दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 119 , 115 के मध्य रेखा , प्लाट नं. 115 के पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 139 के पूर्वी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 139 , 137 , 135 , 145 , 155 , 156 , के दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 261 के मध्य बिन्दु, प्लाट नं. 161 के पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 3058 , 257 के दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 256, 264 के मध्य बिन्दु, मौजा कोनारडीह अ. सू. नं. 14 और मौजा नवग्रम अ. सू. नं. 20 के साझा सीमा रेखा, मौजा - नवग्रम अ. सू. नं. 20 के प्लाट नं. 898 , 900 के दक्षिणी रेखा से गुजरते हुए मौजा नवग्रम अ. सू. नं. 20 के प्लाट नं. 900 के दक्षिण पश्चिम बिन्दु नं. ए 11 पर मिलती हैं ( प्लान प्लेट बी और प्लान प्लेट- सी का साझा बिन्दु ) जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है । [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
प्लान प्लेट - सी
ए 11 -ए 12 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 11 ( प्लान प्लेट- बी और प्लान प्लेट सी का सांझा बिन्दु) , मौजा नवग्राम अ. सू. नं. 20 के प्लाट नं. 900 के दक्षिण पश्चिम बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट नं. 929 के दक्षिणी रेखा प्लाट नं. 900 के मध्य प्लाट नं. 926 , 927 की दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 925, 921 के मध्य , प्लाट नं. 921 , 917 , 914 , 915 , 977, 978 , 1624 , 979 , 1014 , की दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 1014 की पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 1029 , 1028 , 1027 , 1023 , 978 की पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 685 , 688 , 665 , 664, 663 , 662 , 661 , 654 , 656 , 655 , 653 , 651 की दक्षिणी रेखा, पलाट नं. 651 , 652 , 1802 की पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 649, 647,638, 637 , 510 , की दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 510 की पूर्वी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 517 की दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 517 , 519 , 523 की दक्षिणी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 522 की पश्चिमी रेखा , पलाट नं. 624 के मध्य, प्लाट नं. 624 की दक्षिणी रेखा , मौजा- नवग्राम अ.सू. नं. 20 और मौजा शंकरपुर अ. सू. नं. 28 की साझा सीमा से गुजरते हुए मौजा शंकरपुर अ.सू. नं. 28 के प्लाट नं. 1231 की पूर्वी रेखा पर बिन्दु ए 12 पर मिलती हैं जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है । ए 12-ए 13 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 12 मौजा शंकरपुर अ.सू. नं. 28 के प्लाट नं. 1231 की पूर्वी रेखा के मध्य बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट नं. 1379 के मध्य से, प्लाट नं. 1229 की दक्षिणी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 1379 के मध्य से , प्लाट नं. 1215 की दक्षिणी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 1215 , 1214 , 1213 , 1206 की दक्षिणी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 1206 , 1217 , 1218 , 1219 कीपश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 1093 , 1095 , 1096 , 1091 , 1090 , 1083 , 1065 , 1064 , 1063 , 1062 , 1061 , 1048,1049 , 1043 , 1036 , 1035 की दक्षिणी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 1031 के मध्य , प्लाट नं. 1033 , 1032 की दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 1025 के मध्य, प्लाट नं. 1021,489 , 490 की दक्षिणी रेखा से गुजरते हुए मौजा शंकरपुर अ. सू. नं. 28 के प्लाट नं. 490 के दक्षिण पश्चिम में बिन्दु नं. ए 13 पर मिलती हैं, जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
ए 13 -ए 14 यह रेखा बिन्दु नं. ए 13 शंकरपुर अ. सू. नं. 28 के प्लाट नं. 490 के दक्षिण पश्चिमी भाग से शुरू होकर , प्लाट नं. 490 की पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 490 , 489 , 490 , 489 की उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 628 ,627 , 625 की पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 625 , 635 , 636 , की उत्तरी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 621 , 622 की पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 622, 611 , 614 , 701 , 703 , 709 , 715 , 787 , 774 , 781 , 780 , 795 , 809 , 817 , 819 , 821 , 867 , 863 , 862 , 860 , 859 की उत्तरी रेखा से गुजरते हुए मौजा
4067
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
शंकरपुर अ. सू. नं. 28 के प्लाट नं. 859 के उत्तर पूर्वी बिन्दु ए 14 पर मिलती हैं , जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
ए 14 -ए 15 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 14 मौजा शंकरपुर अ. सू. नं. 28 के प्लाट नं. 859 के उत्तर पूर्वी बिन्दु से शुरू होकर, नवग्राम मौजा अ. सू. नं. 20 प्लाट नं. 271 , 270 , 269 , 1686 की पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 1750 , 205 , 204 , 202, 193 , 192 , 191 की दक्षिणी रेखा से गुजरते हुए मौजा नवग्राम अ. सू. नं. 20 प्लाट नं. 190 के दक्षिणी पश्चिमी बिन्दु ए 15 पर मिलती हैं , जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
ए 15 -ए 16 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 15 मौजा नवग्राम अ. सू. नं. 20 के प्लाट नं. 190 , के दक्षिणी पश्चिमी बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट नं. 190, 189, 183, 182 , 181 के पश्चिमी रेखा से गुजरते हुए मौजा नवग्राम अ. सू. नं. 20 के प्लाट नं. 181 के उत्तरी पश्चिमी बिन्दु ए 16 पर मिलती हैं, जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
ए 16 -ए 17 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 16 मौजा नवग्राम अ. सू. नं. 20 के प्लाट नं. 181 , के उत्तरी पश्चिमी बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट नं. 2341 की उत्तरी रेखा प्लाट नं. 2280, 2281 की पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 2281 , 2278 , 2282 , 175 की उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 164 , 151 , के मध्य प्लाट नं. 133 , 134 , 785 , 791 , 790 , 851 की उत्तरी रेखा से गुजरते हुए मौजा नवग्राम अ. सू. नं. 20 के प्लाट नं. 851 के उत्तरी पूर्वी बिन्दु ए 17 ( प्लेट सी एवं प्लेट एवं बी का साझा बिन्दु ) पर मिलती हैं , जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
प्लान प्लेट-बी
ए 17 -ए 18 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 17 ( प्लेट सी एवं प्लेट बी का साझा बिन्दु) नवग्राम अ. सू. नं. 20 के प्लाट नं. 851 के उत्तरी पूर्वी बिन्दु से शुरू होकर मौजा नवग्राम अ. सू. नं. 20 के प्लाट नं. 856 , 857 , 871 , 875 , 879 , 880 , की उत्तरी रेखा , मौजा नवग्राम अ. सू. नं. 20 के प्लाट नं. 880 की पूर्वी रेखा, मौजा कोनारडीह अ. सू. नं. 14 के प्लाट नं. 238 , 248 की उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 242 के मध्य, मौजा कोनारडीह अ.सू. नं. 14 के प्लाट नं. 244 , 181 , 180 , 168 , 178 , 173 , 172 , 145 , 96 की उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 94 , 92 की पश्चिमी रेखा से गुजरते हुए मौजा कोनारडीह अ.सू. नं. 14 के प्लाट नं. 83 के दक्षिणी पश्चिमी बिन्दु ए 18 पर मिलती है , जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
ए 18- ए 19 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 18 मौजा कोनारडीह अ.सू. नं. 14 के प्लाट नं. 83 के दक्षिणी पश्चिमी बिन्दु से शुरू होकर 4068
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
प्लाट नं. 79 , 73 , 3038 , 3052 , 3054 , 3052 की दक्षिणी रेखा , मौजा कोनारडीह अ.सू. नं. 14 के प्लाट प्लाट नं. 3052 की उत्तरी रेखा , मौजा कोनारडीह अ.सू. नं. 14 एवं मौजा नवग्राम अ. सू. नं. 20 की साझा सीमा , प्लाट नं. 1967 , 1927 की दक्षिणी सीमा , प्लाट नं. 2033 के मध्य, प्लाट नं. 2032 की दक्षिणी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 2032 की पश्चिमी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 2026 , 1987 , 1089 , 1990 , 1993 , 1994 , 1996 , 1997 , 2000 की दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 2000 की पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 2003, 2004 के दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 2242 के मध्य से गुजरते हुए मौजा नवग्राम अ.सू. नं. 20 के प्लाट नं. 2242 की पश्चिमी रेखा के मध्य बिन्दु ए 19 पर मिलती हैं , जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है । ए 19 - ए 20 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 19 मौजा नवग्राम अ. सू. नं. 20 के प्लाट नं. 2242 की पश्चिमी रेखा से शुरू होकर मौजा भालूका अ. सू. नं. 21 के प्लाट नं. 398 , 270 , 272 , 273 की दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 273 , 276 की पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 275 की दक्षिणी रेखा से गुजरते हुए मौजा भालूका अ. सू. नं. 21 के प्लाट नं. 275 के दक्षिणी पश्चिमी बिन्दु ए 20 ( प्लेट ए और प्लेट बी के साझा बिन्दु) पर मिलती हैं, जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
प्लान प्लेट ए
ए 20 - ए 21 यह रेखा बिन्दु र 20 ( प्लेट ए और प्लेट बी के साझा बिन्दु) मौजा भालूका अ. सू. नं. 21 के प्लाट नं. 275 के दक्षिणी पश्चिर्म बिन्दु से शुरू होकर मौजा भालूका अ. सू. नं. 21 के प्लाट नं. 283 , 281 की दक्षिण रेखा, प्लाट नं. 281 की पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 280 , 243 के उत्तरी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 95 की पूर्वी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 95 , 93 , 92 , 85, 86, 35 , 43 की दक्षिणी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 43 , 41 के पश्चिमी रेखा , 'लाट नं. 40 की दक्षिणी रेखा से गुजरते हुए मौजा भालूका अ. सू. नं. 21 के प्लाट नं. 40 के दक्षिणी पश्चिमी बिन्दु ए 2। पर मिलती है , जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
ए 21 - ए 22 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 21 मौजा भालूका अ. सू. नं. 21 के प्लाट नं. 40 के दक्षिणी पश्चिमी बिन्दु से शुरू होकर मौजा सोनपुर अ. सू. नं. 22 के प्लाट नं. 813 , 812 , 1526 की दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 844 की मध्य रेखा प्लाट नं. 945 , 947 की पूर्वी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 947,1415 , 1084, 1085 , 1086 , की दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 1086 , 1081 , 1071 , 1075 , 1074, 1071 , की पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 1104 1103 , 1116 , की दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 1355, 1357 , 1358 , 1359 , 1360 , 1362 , 1361 , 1365 की पूर्वी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 1365 , 1349 की दक्षिणी रेखा, मौजा सोनपुर अ. सू. नं. 22 प्लाट नं. 1349 , 1348
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] की पश्चिमी रेखा से गुजरते हुए मौजा सोनपुर अ. सू. नं. 22के प्लाट नं. 1347 के दक्षिणी पश्चिमी बिन्दु ए 22 पर मिलती है , जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है । ए 22 -ए 23 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 22 मौजा सोनपुर अ. सू. नं. 22 के प्लाट नं. 1347 के दक्षिणी पश्चिमी बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट नं. 1330 , 1329 , 1328 के पूर्वी रेखा से गुजरते हुए मौजा सोनपुर अ. सू. नं. 22 के प्लाट नं. 1257 के दक्षिणी पश्चिमी बिन्दु ए 23 पर मिलती है , जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
ए 23 - ए 24 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 23 मौजा सोनपुर अ. सू. नं. 22 के प्लाट नं. 1257 के दक्षिणी पश्चिमी बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट नं. 1254 के दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 1254 , 1253 के पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 204 , 202 के दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 199 के पूर्वी, दक्षिणी , पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 154 के दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 1564 , 196 के पूर्वी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 196 , 171 के दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 172 , 173 , 181 , 188 के पूर्वी रेखा, मौजा सोनपुर अ. सू. नं. 22 के प्लाट नं. 188 , के दक्षिणी रेखा से गुजरते हुए मौजा सोनपुर अ. सू. नं. 22 के प्लाट नं. 181 के दक्षिणी पूर्वी रेखा के बिन्दु ए 24 पर मिलती है , जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
ए 24 - ए 25 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 24 मौजा सोनपुर अ. सू. नं. 22 के प्लाट नं. 181 के दक्षिणी पूर्वी रेखा बिन्दु से शुरू होकर मौजा बाजारी अ. सू. नं. 23 के प्लाट नं. 1446 के पूर्वी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 1446,636 ,637 के दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 635 के मध्य , प्लाट नं. 645 , 646 के पूर्वी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 646 , 633 , 664 , 665 , 667,666 , 672, 669 के दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 668 , 680 के मध्य से गुजरते हुए मौजा बाजारी अ. सू. नं. 23 के प्लाट नं. 680 के दक्षिणी पूर्वी रेखा के बिन्दु ए 25 पर मिलती है , जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
ए 25 - ए 26 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 25 मौजा बाजारी अ. सू. नं. 23 के प्लाट नं. 680 के दक्षिणी पूर्वी बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट नं. 680 के दक्षिणी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 681 , 682 , 684 , 685 , 674 , 592 , 591 , 590 , 583 , 582 के मध्य , प्लाट नं. 580 के पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 480 के मध्य, प्लाट नं. 480 के पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 444 के दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 444 के मध्य , प्लाट नं. 443 के पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 438 , 437 , 434 के मध्य , प्लाट नं. 432 के पश्चिमी रेखा से गुजरते हुए मौजा बाजारी अ. सू. नं. 23 के प्लाट नं. 1812 के उत्तरी पूर्वी बिन्दु ए 26 पर मिलती है , जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
ए 26 -ए 27 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 26 मौजा बाजारी अ . सू. नं. 2.3 के प्लाट नं. 1812 के उत्तरी पूर्वी बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट 4069
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008 / श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
MINISTRY OF COAL
New Delhi , the 24th July, 2008 नं. 422, 415 , 414, 413 के दक्षिणी रेखा, प्लाट नं. 412, 1785 , 53 के मध्य , से गुजरते हुए मौजा बाजारी अ. सू. नं. 23 के प्लाट नं. 53 के दक्षिणी पंश्चिमी बिन्दु ए27 पर मिलती है, जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
ए 27 - ए 28 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 27 मौजा बाजारी अ. सू. नं. 23 के प्लाट नं. 53 के दक्षिणी पश्चिमी बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट नं. 53 , 36 के पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 36 , 34 के मध्य से गुजरते हुए मौजा बाजारी अ. सू. नं. 23 के प्लाट नं. 31 के दक्षिणी पूर्वी बिन्दु ए 28 पर मिलती है, जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
S.O. 2032. Whereas , by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 958 dated the 27th February, 2006 issued under sub- section (1) ofSection 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957, ( 20 of 1957 ) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in the Gazette of India , in PartII , Section 3 , sub - section ( ii ) dated 11th March , 2006, the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for Coal in 1211 hectares (approximately ) of the lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification ;
And, whereas , the notification on the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O 370 dated 19th February, 2008 under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the said Act and published in the Gazette of India in Part II, Section 3 , sub - section ( ii ) dated the 23rd February , 2008 , the Central Government specified a further period of one year commencing from the 26th February, 2008 as the period within which the Central Government may give notice of its intention to acquire the said Lands or any right in or over such Lands ;
ए 28 -ए 29 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 28 मौजा बाजारी अ. सू. नं. 23 के प्लाट नं. 31 के दक्षिणी पूर्वी बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट नं. 34, 38 , 40 , 42 , 43 , 47 , 46, 45 , 79 , 77 , 76 , 75, 74, 73 , 72 , 71 , 70 ,64 ,68 , 156 , 157 के मध्य रेखा, प्लाट नं. 168 , 167 के पूर्वी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 170, 172, 174 , 177 के मध्य, पलाट नं. 178 , 180 के पूर्वी रेखा से गुजरते हुए मौजा बाजारी अ. सू. नं. 23 के प्लाट नं. 180 के दक्षिणी पूर्वी बिन्दु ए 29 पर मिलती है, जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
And, whereas , the Central Government is satisfied coal is obtainable in the whole of the said lands prescribed in the said Schedule appended to this notification ;
ए 29 - ए 30 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 29 मौजा बाजारी अ. सू. नं. 23 के प्लाट नं. 180 के दक्षिणी पूर्वी बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट नं. 180 , 179 के दक्षिणी रेखा से गुजरते हुए मौजा बाजारी अ. सू. नं. 23 के प्लाट नं. 179 के दक्षिणी पूर्वी बिन्दु ए 30 पर मिलती है , जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
Now, therefore , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957 ) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the lands measuring 1200 hectares ( approximately ) or2964 acres ( approximately) and all rights as described in the Schedule annexed hereto :
ए 30 - ए 31 यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 30 मौजा बाजारी अ. सू. नं. 23 के प्लाट नं. 179 के दक्षिणी पश्चिमी बिन्दु से शुरू होकर प्लाट नं. 174, 171 , 168 , 156 , 169 के प्लाट नं. 179 के पश्चिमी रेखा , 170, 169 के मध्य, प्लाट नं. पश्चिमी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 177 , 179 , 45 , 44 , 43 , 41 , 30 , 32 के मध्य से गुजरते हुए मौजा बाजारी अ. सू. नं. 23 के प्लाट नं. 32 के उत्तरी पूर्वी बिन्दु ए 31 पर मिलती है, जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
Note 1-The plan bearing number ECL/ SBP / SURV/2008 / 31 Dated 15th January , 2008 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the office of the Collector , Burdwan ( West Bengal ) , or in the office of the Coal Controller , 1, Council House Strect , Kolkata 700001 , or in the office of the Director Technical ( Project & Planning ) , Eastern Coalfields Limited, Sanctoria , Post Office Dishergar , District Burdwan ( West Bengal ) Pin Code Number - 713333 :
Note 2-Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of Section 8 of the Said Act which provides as follows :-
Objection to acquisition :
ए 31 -ए । यह रेखा बिन्दु ए 31 मौजा बाजारी अ. सू. नं. 23 के प्लाट नं. 32 के उत्तरी पूर्वी बिन्दु से शुरू होकर मौजा केन्द्रा खोट्टाडीह अ. सू. नं. 1 के प्लाट नं. 3079 के दक्षिणी रेखा , प्लाट नं. 3079 के मध्य से गुजरते हुए मौजा केन्द्रा खोट्टाडीह अ. सू. नं.। के प्लाट नं. 3320 के दक्षिणी पश्चिमी बिन्दु ए । पर मिलती है, जैसा कि प्लान में दर्शाया गया है ।
[ संख्या-43015/9/2005- पी आर आई डब्ल्यू । ( खण्ड- II ) ]
8 ( 1 ) Any person interested in any land in respect of which notification under Section 7 has been issued may, within thirty days of the issue of the notification , object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over such land .
एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव
2745 G1/08-3 4070
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
Explanation:
( 1 ) It shall not be an objection within the meaning ofthis section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operations in the land for the production of the coal and that such operations simulu pot be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person.
(2) Every objection under sub- section ( 1 ) shall be made to the competent authority in writing and the competent authority shall give the objecto: an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall , after hearing all such objections and after making such further enquiry, if any, as he thinks necessary , either make a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 7 or of rights
SCHEDULE
Block- Sonepur , Raniganj Coalfields District Burdwan (West Bengal )
All Rights
(Plan-Drawing No. ECL / SBP/ Surv/2008/ 31 dated 15th January, 2008)
Sl . No.
Village No.
Patwari halka/JL Number* Name of Mouza Village*
1 . Kendra Khottadi
1
Notapplicable
2.
2
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] in or over such land, or make different reports in respect ofdifferent parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land , to the Central Government , containing his recommenda- tions on the objections together with the record of the proceedings held by him , for the decisions of that Government .
(3) For the purposes of this section , a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under thisAct .
Note 3 -The Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata 700001 has been appointed by the Central Government as the competent authority under Section 3 of the Act , vide notification number S.O. 2520 dt . 11th June , 1983 .
Remarks District
Tahsil/ PS *
Area in Hectare
Pandaveswar Burdwan
30.00
Part Burdwan
39.00
Part
Pandaveswar
Bilpahari
Notapplicable
3.
4 Dalurbandh
Notapplicable
4. Chakkarala
11
Notapplicable
5 . Joalbhanga
Notapplicable 12 6. Bhatmura
Notapplicable 13 7.
14 Konardihi
Notapplicable
8.
20 Nabagram
Notapplicable
9. Bhaluka
21
Notapplicable
22 10. Sonepur
Notapplicable
11. Bazari
Notapplicable 23 12. Shankarpur
Notapplicable 28 Burdwan
199.00
Pandaveswar
Part Burdwan
3.00
Pandaveswar
Part
77.00
Burdwan
Part
Pandaveswar
Pandaveswar Burdwan
68.00
Part Burdwan
57.00
Pandaveswar
Part Burdwan
167.00
Pandaveswar
Part
Part
Pandaveswar Burdwan
83.12
Burdwan
Pandaveswar
365.88
Part
Pandaveswar Burdwan
70.00
Part Burdwan
41.00
Pandaveswar
Part
Total : 1200 hectares ( approximately ) or 2964 acres ( approximately) * as per Revenue records .
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
1. Plot numbers to be acquired in village /Mouza-- Kendra Khottadihi , Jurisdiction List No. 1 , Police Station Pandaveswar , District Burdwan ( West Bengal ) 2315 (P), 2822 (P), 3079(P) , 3106( P) , 3125 (P), 3126, 3127, 3129(P), 3130, 3131 , 3132, 3134,3135, 3136, 3137 (P), 3138 , 3139, 3143 (P), 3144 (P) , 3149(P), 3150(P) , 3151 (P), 3154,3155, 3156,3157, 3158,3159, 3160, 3161,3162, 3163 , 3164,3165, 3166,3167,3168,3169 (P), 3170 (P), 3183 (P), 3187(P), 3190(P), 3191,3225 (P), 3226, 3227 , 3228 (P), 3229(P ), 3231 , 3232, 3233 , 3234 , 3235 (P), 3237 (P), 3238 , 3239, 3105/3320(P ), 3127/3322, 3127/3323 , 3079/3329,3190/3762,3190/3763,3190/3764,3190/ 3765, 3190/3766, 3190/3767, 3190/3768 , 3190/3769 , 3079/ 3787,3079/3788 , 3079/3789.
2. Plot numbers to be acquired in village/Mouza- Bilpahari , Jurisdiction List No. 2 , Police Station Pandaveswar, District Burdwan (West Bengal ) 1149(P), 1150, 1167(P), 1168 (P), 1169, 1170, 1171 , 1172, 1173, 1174, 1175, 1176, 1177, 1178 , 1179, 1180, 1181 , 1182, 1183, 1184, 1185, 1186(P), 1187 , 1188, 1189, 1190, 1191, 1192, 1193, 1194(P) , 1195 (P) , 1217(P), 1219 (P), 1220, 1221 , 1222 , 1223, 1224, 1225, 1226, 1227 , 1228 , 1229, 1239, 1240 , 1241 (P), 1248, 1249.
3. Plot numbers to be acquired in village /Mouza- Dalurbandh , Jurisdiction List No. 4 , Police Station Pandaveswar , District Burdwan (West Bengal) 956, 957 (P) , 958 , 959, 960, 961 , 962, 963 , 964, 965, 966, 967,968,969 , 970, 971,972,973,974,975,976,977,978,979, 980, 981 , 982, 983, 984, 985, 986, 987, 988, 989, 990, 991 , 992, 993,994, 995 , 996, 997 , 998 , 999, 1000, 1001 , 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007 , 1008 , 1009, 1010 , 1011 , 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018 , 1019, 1020, 1021 , 1022 , 1023 , 1024, 1025, 1026 , 1027, 1028 , 1029, 1030 , 1031 , 1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1036, 1037 , 1038 , 1039, 1040 , 1041 , 1042, 1043, 1044, 1045, 1046, 1047 , 1048, 1049, 1050 , 1051 , 1052, 1053 , 1054, 1055 , 1056, 1057 , 1058 , 1059, 1060, 1061 (P), 1062, 1063, 1064, 1065, 1066, 1067 , 1068 , 1069, 1070, 1071 , 1072, 1073, 1074, 1075, 1076, 1077, 1078, 1079 (P) , 1080, 1081 , 1082 , 1083 , 1084, 1085, 1086 , 1087, 1088 , 1089, 1090 , 1091 , 1092, 1093 , 1094, 1095, 1096, 1097, 1098 , 1099, 1100, 1101 , 1102, 1103, 1104, 1105, 1106, 1107, 1108, 1109, 1110, 1111 , 1112, 1113, 1114, 1115, 1116, 1117, 1118 , 1119, 1120, 1121 , 1122 , 1123 , 1124, 1125 , 1126, 1127, 1128 , 1129, 1130, 1131 , 1132, 1133 , 1134, 1135, 1136, 1137, 1138 , 1139, 1140, 1141 , 1142, 1143, 1144, 1145, 1146, 1147 , 1148, 1149, 1150, 1151 , 1152, 1153 , 1154, 1155, 1156, 1157, 1158, 1159, 1160, 1161 , 1162, 1163 , 1164, 1165 , 1166 , 1167 , 1168 , 1169 , 1170 , 1171 , 1172, 1173,1174,1175,1176,1177, 1178 , 1179(P), 1180, 1181 , 1182, 1183, 1184,1185, 1186, 1187, 1188 , 1189 , 1190, 1191 , 1192, 1193, 1194, 1195, 1196, 1197, 1198, 1199, 1200, 1201 , 1202, 1203 , 1204 , 1205 , 1206, 1207 , 1208 , 1209, 1210 , 1211 , 1212, 1213 , 1214, 1215, 1216, 1217(P) , 1218 , 1219, 1220 , 1221 , 1222, 1223 , 1224, 1225 , 1226, 1227 , 1228 , 1229 , 1230 , 1231 , 1232 , 1233 , 1234, 1235 , 1236 , 1237, 1238 , 1239, 1240, 1241 , 1242, 1243, 1244, 1245 , 1246 , 1247 , 1248 , 1249 , 1250 , 1251 , 1252 , 1253 , 1254 , 1255 , 1256, 1257 , 1258 , 1259, 1260, 1261 , 1262 , 1263, 1264, 1265 , 1266 , 1267 , 1268 , 1269 , 1270, 1271 , 1272 , 1273, 1274, 1275, 1276, 1277, 1278 , 1279, 1280, 1281 (P) , 1283, 1284 , 1285 (P) , 1286 (P) , 1353 , 1354 , 1355 (P ) , 1356, 1357, 1358 (P) , 1359(P) , 1360, 1361 , 1362, 1363 (P), 1364 (P ) , 1365, 1366, 1367, 1368 , 1369 , 1370 , 1371 , 1372, 1373 , 1374, 1375 , 1376, 1377, 1378 , 1379 , 1380, 1381 (P), 1382, 1383 , 1384, 1385, 1386 , 1387 , 1388 , 1389, 1390, 1391 , 1392, 1393 , 1394, 1395, 1396, 1397, 1398 , 1399, 1400, 1401 , 1402 , 1403, 1404, 1405,
4071
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
1406, 1407, 1408 , 1409, 1410,1411 , 1412 , 1413 , 1414, 1415. 1416, 1417, 1418 , 1419 , 1420, 1421 , 1422, 1423 , 1424 , 1425, 1426, 1427 , 1428 , 1429 , 1430, 1431 , 1432 , 1433 , 1434 , 1435 . 1436, 1437, 1438, 1439, 1440, 1441 , 1442, 1443 (P), 1444, 1445, 1446, 1447 , 1448 , 1449 , 1450 , 1451 , 1452, 1453 , 1454、1455、 1456 , 1457 , 1458 , 1459, 1460 , 1461 , 1462 , 1463 , 1464, 1465, 1466(P), 1561 , 1562 , 1563 , 1564, 1565 , 1566, 1567, 1568 , 1569, 1570 , 1571 , 1572, 1573 , 1574 , 1575 , 1576 , 1577 , 1578 , 1579 、 1580, 1581 , 1582 , 1583 , 1584 , 1585,1586, 1587, 1588. 1589 ( P ) , 1590 , 1591 , 1592 , 1593 , 1594, 1595, 1596 , 1597 , 1598 , 1599 , 1600 , 1601 , 1602, 1603 , 1604, 1605, 1606, 1607, 1608,1609, 1610, 1611 , 1612, 1613 , 1614, 1615 , 1616 , 1617 , 1618 , 1619 , 1620, 1621 , 1622 , 1623 , 1624, 1625, 1626, 1627 , 1628 , 1629 . 1630 , 1631 , 1632 , 1633 , 1634 , 1635, 1636 , 1637 , 1638 , 1639 , 1640, 1641 , 1642, 1643 , 1069/1659 , 980/1669 , 1148/1670, 1427/ 1671 , 1418/1673 , 1418/1674, 1418/1675 , 1420/1676 、 1420/1677 , 1420/1678, 1420/1679, 1607/1680 , 1569/ 1681,1569/ 1682, 1616/1683 , 1611/1684, 1409/1685 , 1409/1686 , 1409/ 1687, 1409/1688 , 1409/1689 , 1089/1725 , 1096/1726, 1096/1727 , 1172/1728 , 1176/1729 , 1176/1730, 1180/ 1.731 , 1180/1732,1180/ 1733, 1187/1734, 1187/1735 , 1187/1736 , 1187/1737,1187/ 1738, 1188/1739 , 1188/1740, 1364/1826 , 1346/1840( P) 1346/ 1841 , 1346/1842, 1561/1843 , 1561/1844 , 1561/1845 , 1365/ 1846, 1112/1883 , 1112/1884 , 1112/1885 , 1112/1886 , 1112/ 1887, 1179/1888,957/ 1889 , 957/1890 , 957/1891 , 957/1892 , 957/1893 , 1179/1894, 1179/1895 , 1112/1912 , 1214/1913 , 1214/ 1914, 1214/1915, 1115/1916 , 1641/1936 , 1641/1937 , 1366/ 2050, 957/2051 , 1161/2052, 1161/2053 , 1161/2054, 957/2055 , 1161/2056, 1161/2057 , 1161/ 2058,957/2059,1446/2087 (P ) . 1466/2099 , 1619/2112 , 1619/2113 , 1619/2114.
4. Plot numbers to be acquired in village/ Mouza - Chakkarala , Jurisdiction List No. 11 , Police Station Pandaveswar , District Burdwan ( West Bengal ) 90(P) , 156, 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 ( P) , 161 ( P) , 163 ( P) . 176. 185(P), 186 , 187, 243 (IP) , 641 , 243/647.
5. Plot numbers to be acquired in village / Mouza - Joalbhanga , Jurisdiction List No. 12 , Police Station Pandaveswar , District Burdwan ( West Bengal ) 1(P), 2 (P), 3 , 4( P) , 6, 7, 8 , 9 , 10, 11 , 12, 13 , 14 , 15 , 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23 , 24, 25 , 26, 27, 28 , 29 , 30, 31 , 32, 33 , 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 , 41 , 42, 43, 44, 45 , 46, 47, 48 , 49, 50, 51 , 52, 53 , 54, 55 , 56,57,58,59, 29/ 1216,639/ 1219 , 639/ 1220,639 / 1221 . 639/1222, 639/1223,639 /1224,639/ 1225,639/ 1226,639/ 1227、 639/1228, 639/1229, 639/ 1231,639/ 1232,639/ 1233,639/1251 . 10/1261 , 639/1361 , 639/1362, 639/1363,639/1364,639/1365 、 639/1366,639/1367,639/ 1368,639/1369,639/1370,639/1371 , 639/1372,639/1373,639/1374,639/1376,639/1377,639/1379, 639/1380,639/1381,639/ 1382,639/ 1383,639/1384,639/1385 , 639/1386,639/1387,639 /1388,639/1391,639/1393,639/1394, 639/1395,639/1396,639/ 1397,639/1398,639/ 1399,639/ 1401 . 639/1402,639/1403,639/1404,639/ 1405,639/ 1406,639/ 1407 、 639/1408,639/1410,639/ 1411,639/ 1412,639/1414,639/1415, 639/1416,639/1417,639/1418 , 639/ 1419,639/1420,639/ 1421,639/1422,639/ 1423 , 639/1424,639/1425 , 639/1427,639/ 1429,639/1430,639/ 1431,639/1432,639/1433,639/1436.639/ 1437,639/1438,639/1439, 639/1442,639/ 1448 , 639/ 1449,639/ 1450,639/1451,639/ 1452,639/1453,639/1454,639/1455,639 1457,639/1458 ,639/1460, 639/1461 , 639/1462, 639/1463,639/ 1464, 639/1465 , 639/1466,639/ 1469,639/1470,639/1471,639/ 1472,639/1473,639/1474,639/1476,639/ 1477.639/ 1478,639/ 1479, 639/1480,639/ 1481 , 58 /1482,58/1483,58/1485,58/1486、 58/1487,58/1489 , 57/1490, 57/1492 , 57/1493 , 57/1494,59/ 1495,59/1497, 59/1498 , 59/1499 , 59/1500 , 59/1501,59/1502 , 4072
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] 59/1503 , 59/1504 , 59/1505 , 59/1506 , 59/1508 , 59/1509 , 59/ 1510 , 59/1511 , 59/1512 , 59/1513 , 59/1514, 59/1515, 59/1516, 59/1517, 59/1518 , 59/1519 , 59/1520 , 59/1521 , 55/1522 , 28/ 1573, 14/1604, 14/1605, 639/1612.
226, 227, 228,229 , 230 , 231 , 232 , 233 , 234 , 235 , 236, 237, 238 ,
239,240,241 , 242 , 243 , 244, 245 , 246, 247, 248 , 249,250,251 , 6. Plot numbers to be acquired in village/Mouza - Bhatmura , Jurisdiction List . No. 13 , Police Station Pandaveswar, District Burdwan (West Bengal)
1,6, 7, 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14, 15, 16 , 17 , 18, 19 , 20 , 21 ,
278,279,280,281 , 282 , 283 , 284, 285 , 286 , 287 , 288 , 289, 290 ,
317,318,319 , 320, 321 , 322 , 323 , 324, 325 , 326 , 327, 328 , 329 ,
356,357,358,359 , 360, 361 , 362, 363 , 364, 365 , 366, 367, 368 ,
395, 396, 397, 398 , 399, 400 , 401 , 402, 403 , 404, 405 , 406, 407,
447,448,449,450 , 451 , 452, 453, 454, 455, 456,457,458,459 ,
486,487,488,489 , 490, 491 , 492, 493 , 494, 495, 496,497, 498, 22, 23 , 24 , 25, 26, 27, 28 , 29, 30, 31 , 79, 80, 81 , 83 , 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91 , 92, 94, 95, 96, 97, 99, 100 , 101 , 102, 103 , 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111 , 112, 113 , 114, 115 , 116, 117 , 118, 119 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126, 127, 128 , 129, 130, 131 , 132, 133 , 134, 26/204,26/205 , 26/206 , 134/207,25 /221,25 /222,25/223 , 25/224,25/225 , 25/226 , 25/227 , 25/228 , 13/237 , 13/238 , 13/ 239, 13/240 , 13/241 , 13/242 , 13/243 , 13/244, 8/245 , 8/246, 8/ 247, 8/248 , 8/249 , 8/250, 8/251 , 8/252 , 8/253 , 8/254,8/255 ,7/ 256 , 6/257 , 6/258,27/259,27/260 , 27/261 , 26/262,26/ 263 , 1/ 264, 1/265 , 1/266 , 1/267, 1/268 , 1/269 , 1/270 , 1/271 , 1/272 , 1 / 273 , 1/274 , 1/275 , 1/276 , 1/277 , 1/278 , 1/279 , 1/280 , 1/281 , 1 / 282, 1/283 , 1/284, 1/285 , 1/286 , 1/287 , 1/288 , 1/289 , 1/290 , 1/ 291 , 1/292 , 1/293 , 1/294 , 1/295 , 1/296 , 1/297, 1/298 , 11/299, 11/300 , 1/301 , 1/302 , 1/303 , 1/304 , 1/305, 1/306, 1/307, 1/308 , 1/309,81/311,81/312 , 81/313 , 81/314,81/315,81/316, 81/317, 81/318 , 81/319 , 81/320 , 81/321 , 81/322 , 81/323 , 81/324 , 80/325 , 81/326, 81/327 , 81/328 , 79/329 , 79/330 , 84/ 331, 81/332, 81/333 , 81/334 , 85/335 , 1/342 , 1/343 , 1/344 , 1 / 345, 1 /346,1 /347, 1/348 , 1/349 , 1/350, 1/351 , 1/352, 1/353 , 1 / 354, 1/355 , 1/356 , 1/357 , 1/358 , 1/359, 1/360 , 1/361 , 1/362 , 1 / 363, 1/364 , 1 /365,1 / 366 , 1/367 , 1/368 , 1/369 , 1/370 , 1/371 , 1 / 372, 1/373 , 1/374 , 1/375 , 1/376 , 1/377 , 1/378 , 1/379, 1/380, 1 / 381 , 1/382 , 1/383 , 1/384 , 1/385 , 1/386 , 1/387, 1/388 , 1/389, 1 / 390, 1/391 , 1/392 , 1/393 , 1/394, 1/395 , 1/396, 1/397 , 1/398 , 1/ 399,1/400 , 1/401 , 1/402 , 1/403 , 1/404 , 1/405 , 1/406 , 1/407 , 1 / 408, 1/409 , 1/410 , 1/411 , 1/412, 1/413 , 1/414, 1/415 , 1/416 , 1/ 417, 1/418 , 1/419 , 1/420 , 1/421 , 1/422 , 1/423 , 1/424 , 1/425 , 1/
426, 1/427 , 1/428 , 1/429 , 1/430 , 1/431 , 1/432 , 1/433, 1/434, 1 /
435, 1/436, 1/437 , 1/438 , 1/439 , 1/440 , 1/441 , 1/442, 1/443 , 1 /
660,661,662,663 , 664, 665 , 666, 667, 668 , 669,670,671,672 , 444, 1/445, 1/446, 1/447 .
7. Plot numbers to be acquired in village /Mouza - Konardihi , Jurisdiction List No. 14 , Police Station Pandaveswar , District Burdwan (West Bengal)
875,879,880 , 881,882, 883,884 , 885 , 886, 887,888,889,890 , 891,892,893,894, 895 , 896 , 897 , 898 , 899 , 900 , 901 , 902, 903 , 1,2,3,4,5,6, 7 , 8 , 9 , 10, 11 , 12 , 13 , 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 , 19, 20, 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26, 27, 28 , 29, 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34, 35 , 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 , 42(P) , 45 , 46, 47, 48 , 49, 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57, 58 , 59 , 60, 61 , 62, 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67, 68 , 69 , 70, 71 , 72 , 73, 79 , 80,81 , 82 , 83 , 84, 85 , 86 , 87, 88 , 89, 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94, 96, 97 , 98, 99, 100 , 101 , 102, 103 , 104 , 105 , 106, 107 , 108 , 109, 110, 111 , 112, 113 , 114 , 115(P) , 116, 117, 119( P ) , 135 , 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141 142, 143 , 144, 145 , 146, 147, 148 , 149 , 150 151 , 152, 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158, 159 , 160, 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171 , 172, 173 , 178, 180, 181,238 , 242(P) , 243, 244 , 245 , 246 , 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252,253,254 , 255 , 256( P) , 257 , 258 , 259 , 261 ( P ) , 264 ( PP) , 19/2980 , 247/2981,40/ 2984, 40/3009 , 40/3010 , 8/3015 , 1/3021 , 3/3022 , 5/3023 , 5 / 3024,38/3025,38 /3026 , 8/3027, 8/3028 , 4/3029, 42/3030, 136/ 3035, 114/3036 , 57/3037, 71/3038 , 71/3039 , 71/3040, 70/3052, 70/3053 , 70/3054 , 71/3055 , 259/3058 , 56/3071 .
8. Plot numbers to be acquired in village /Mouza - Nabagram , Jurisdiction List No. 20 , Police Station Pandaveswar , District Burdwan ( West Bengal )
161 , 162, 163 , 164( P) , 165 , 166, 167, 168 , 169 , 170, 171 , 172 , 173 , 174, 175, 176 , 177 , 178, 181 , 182 , 183 , 184, 185 , 186 , 187, 188 , 189 , 190, 191 , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195 , 196, 197, 198, 199 , 200,201 , 202 , 203 , 204, 205, 206,207, 208 , 209 , 210, 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220, 221 , 222, 223, 224, 225 , 252,253,254,255,256,257,258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262, 263 , 264, 265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277 , 291,292,293 , 294 , 295 , 296, 297, 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302 , 303 , 304, 305, 306, 307, 308 , 309, 310 , 311 , 312 , 313 , 314,315,316, 330,331,332 , 333 , 334 , 335 , 336 , 337,338 , 339, 340, 341 , 342 , 343,344,345,346 , 347 , 348 , 349 , 350 , 351 , 352, 353 , 354,355 , 369,370,371,372,373,374,375 , 376, 377, 378,379,380,381 , 382,383,384 , 385 , 386, 387 , 388, 389, 390 , 391,392, 393 , 394 , 408,409, 410 , 411 , 412, 413 , 414 , 415, 416, 417, 418,419,420, 421,422,423 ,424, 425 , 426, 427 , 428, 429,430,431,432,433 , 434,435,436,437,438,439, 440, 441 , 442, 443 , 444, 445,446, 460,461,462,463,464, 465, 466,467, 468, 469,470,471,472, 473,474,475,476,477,478,479,480,481,482,483,484,485 , 499, 500, 501 , 502 , 503 , 504, 505 , 506 , 507 , 508 , 509 , 510,517 , 518 , 519 , 520, 522 , 523 , 524, 525 , 526 , 527 , 528,529,530,531 , 532, 533,534 , 535, 536 , 537,538 , 539 , 540, 541 , 542 , 543,544, 545, 546, 547, 548 , 549 , 550 , 551 , 552, 553, 554,555,556 , 557, 558,559,560,561,562 , 563 , 564 , 565 , 566 , 567 , 568 , 569,570 , 571,572,573,574,575,576,577 , 578 , 579 , 580 , 581,582 , 583 , 584,585,586,587, 588 , 589, 590 , 591 , 592, 593 , 594, 595, 596 , 597, 598 , 599 , 600 , 601 , 602, 603 , 604 , 605 , 606 , 607, 608 , 609 , 610,611,612,613,614,615,616, 617 , 618,619 , 620, 621 , 622, 623 , 624(P) , 637 , 638 , 639, 640 , 641 , 642, 643 , 644, 645 , 646, 647, 648,649,650,651,652,653 , 654, 655, 656 , 657,658,659, 673,674,675,676,677,678,679 , 680 , 681 , 682,683,684,685 , 686, 687,688,689, 690 , 691 , 692, 693 , 694 , 695 , 696, 697,698 , 699, 700, 701 , 702 , 703 , 704, 705 , 706 , 707, 708 , 709 , 710 , 711 , 712,713,714,715 , 716 , 717,718 , 719 , 720, 721,722 , 723 , 724 , 725,726,727,728 , 729 , 730 , 731 , 732 , 733 , 734,735,736,737 , 738,739,740,741 , 742 , 743 , 744,745,746,747,748,749,750 , 751,752,753,754,755,756,757,758,759,760 , 761 , 762, 763 , 764,765,766,767,768,769,770 , 771,772,773,774,775,776 , 777,778,779,780 , 781,782 , 783 , 784, 785, 786 , 787, 788789, 790,791,851,852,853,854,855,856,857,871,872,873,874, 904, 905,906, 907, 908 , 909 , 910,911,912,913,914,915,916 , 917,918,919(P) , 920 , 921 ( P ) , 922 , 923 , 924 , 925 ( P) , 926 , 927, 929,975,976,977 , 978 , 979 , 980 ( P) , 1014 , 1016 , 1017, 1018, 1019 , 1020, 1021 , 1022 , 1023 , 1024, 1025 , 1026 , 1027 , 1028 , 1029 , 1030 , 1031 , 194/1604 , 144/1605 , 449/1606; 404/1608 , 49/1611,49/ 1612,49/ 1613,789/ 1614,873/ 1615,313/ 1618,323/ 1619,478/ 1620 , 534/ 1621,733 / 1622 , 781 / 1623,980/ 1625 , 1016/ 1626, 135/1628 , 137/1629 , 249/1630 , 327/ 1631,368/1632,722/ 1633,775/1634, 484/1637,531/ 1638,554/ 1639,727/1640 , 738/ 1643;320/ 1644,297/1646 , 475/1647 , 728/1648 , 149/ 1649,776/ 1651,777/ 1652,366/ 1653,367/ 1654,918/ 1655,921 / 1656,922 / 1657,923/ 1658,924/ 1659, 926/ 1660,927/ 1661,359/1673,450/ 1674,480/1675,551/ 1676,557/ 1677,729/ 1678,786/1679,524/ 1682,240/1685, 268/1686, 308 / 1687,437/ 1688,770/ 1689,614/ 1692,298 / 1693 , 589/ 1694,590/ 1695,611 / 1698,248 / 1700,295/ 48 , 49 , 51,52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57, 58 , 59 , 133, 134 , 135, 136, 137 , 138 , 139, 140, 141 , 142 , 143, 144, 145 , 146 , 147, 148 , 149,150, 151 ( P) , 152, 153 , 154, 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 4073
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
339, 340, 341 , 342, 343 , 344, 345 , 346, 347, 348 , 349, 350, 351 , 352,353,354,355,356, 357, 358 , 359, 360, 361 , 362, 363 , 364, 365, 366, 367, 368 , 369, 370, 371,372,373,374,375,376, 377, 378,379,380, 381,382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 390 , 391,392, 393,394, 395 , 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401 , 402, 403 , 404,405,406,407, 408, 409, 410 , 411 , 412, 413 , 414,415,416, 417, 418,419, 420, 421 , 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430,431,432,433,434, 435, 436, 437, 438 , 439, 440, 441 , 443, 444,445,446,447.
10. Plot numbers to be acquired in village/Mouza - Sonepur , Jurisdiction List No. 22, Police Station Pandaveswar , District Burdwan (West Bengal )
1, 2 , 3 , 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 , 9, 10, 11 , 12, 13 , 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 , 1701,420/1702,439/1703,553/1704, 890/1705,216/ 1711,530/ 1712,209/1713,430/1714,207/ 1716,279/1717,448/1718,354/ 1722,460/1723,672/ 1724, 208/1725, 307/ 1726,456/ 1727,673/ 1728,852/ 1729,343/1734,857/1735,245/1738,444/1739,479/ 1740,758/1743,384/1744 , 739/1747,750/1748,762/1749,205/ 1753,253/1754,296/ 1755,259/ 1758,210/1760 , 426/1762,386/ 1763,790/1764,721/ 1766 , 747/1768 , 306/ 1772,454/1773,787/ 1774,796/1775,910/1776,240/ 1785,241 / 1786,323 / 1787,323/ 1788,323/1789 , 374/1790,438/1791,453/ 1792,455/1793,478/ 1794,481/1795,496/ 1796, 507/1797, 507/1798 , 510/ 1799,650/ 1801,653/1802,653/1803 , 657/1804, 686/1805, 686/1806,733/ 07, 733 / 1808,748/1809,781 / 1810, 781 / 1811,881 / 1817,881/ 1818 , 910/1819 , 49/1844, 49/1845 , 49/1846,49 /1847,49/ 1848,49/1849,49/1850,49/ 1851,49/ 1852, 49/1853 , 49/1854,49/ 1855,49/ 1856,49/ 1857,49/ 1858,49 / 1859,49 / 1860, 49/1861 ,49/ 1862,49/1863,49/1864 , 49/1865 , 49/1866,49/ 1867,49/1868,49/ 1869, 49/1870, 48/1871 , 59/1872,49/1873 , 59/1874, 59/1875, 52/1876 , 52/1877 , 59/1878 , 53/1879 , 53/1880 , 53/1881 , 56/ 1882, 56/1883 , 56/1884, 56/1885, 56/1886 , 56/1887 , 56/1888 , 56/1889 , 56/1890, 56/1891 , 56/1892,56 / 1893,56/1894,56/ 1895,56/1896 , 56/1897 , 56/ 1898,56/ 1899 , 56/1900 , 56/1901 , 56/1902, 56/1903 , 56/1904, 56/1905,56/ 1906, 56/1907,56/ 1908, 56/1909 , 56/1910 , 56/1911 , 56/1912, 56/1913 , 56/1914 ,56/ 1915, 56/1916 , 56/1917, 56/1918 , 56/1919 , 56/1920, 56/1921 , 56/1922 , 56/1923 , 56/1924 , 56/1925, 56/1926 , 56/1927 , 56/ 1928,56/ 1929,56/ 1930,56/ 1931,56/ 1932, 56/1933 , 56/1934, 56/ 1935, 56/1936 , 56/1937 , 56/1938 , 56/1939 , 56/1940 , 56/1941 , 56/1942, 56/1943 , 57/1944 , 57/1945 , 59/ 1946,59/ 1947,59/ 1948,59/1949,59/ 1950 , 59/1951 , 59/1952 , 59/1953 , 59/1954 , 59/1955,59/1956,59/ 1957, 59/1958,59/ 1959,59/ 1960, 59/1961 , 61/1962, 61/1963 , 61/1964, 61/1965 , 61/1966, 61/1967, 61 / 1968, 61/1971 , 61/1972 , 61/1973 , 59/1974 , 59/1975 , 59/1976, 59/1977, 59/1978 , 59/1979 , 59/1980, 59/1981 , 59/1982, 59/ 1983 , 59/1984 , 59/1985 , 59/1986 , 59/1987, 59/1988 , 59/1989, 59/1990 , 59/1991 , 59/1992 , 59/1993 , 59/1994 , 59/1995 , 59/ 1996, 59/1997, 59/1998 , 59/1999, 59/2000 , 59/2001 ( P ), 59/2003 , 59/2004, 61/2026, 61/2032, 61/2033 (P), 180/2277 , 180/2278 , 180/2279, 180/2280 , 180/2281 , 180/2282( P) , 59/2287 , 59/2288 , 61 /2289,8 /2291,255 /2300 , 309 /2301,310 /2302,440 /2303,490 2304,490/2305,490 /2306 , 586/2307, 586/2308 , 789 /2315,789/ 2316, 789/2317,876/2318 , 59/2324 , 311/2340, 181/2341 , 181 / 2342,251/2345 , 59/2347 .
9. Plot numbers to be acquired in village/Mouza - Bhaluka , Jurisdiction List No. 21 , Police Station Pandaveswar, District Burdwan (West Bengal)
19, 20, 21 , 22, 23 , 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 , 29, 30, 31 , 32, 33 , 34, 35, 36,37, 38 , 39, 40, 41 , 42, 43 , 44, 45 , 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51 , 52 , 53, 54, 55, 56, 57 , 58, 59 , 60, 61 , 62 , 63, 64 , 65, 66, 67, 68, 69 , 70, 71 , 72, 73 , 74, 75 , 76, 77 , 78 , 79, 80, 81 , 82 , 83, 84, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91 , 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97 , 99, 100, 101 102, 103 , 104, 105, 106, 107 , 108 , 109, 110, 111 , 112, 113 , 114, 115 , 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121 , 122, 123 , 124, 125 , 126 , 127, 128, 129, 130, 13 1 , 132 133 , 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141 , 142, 143 , 144, 145, 146, 147, 148 , 149, 150 151 , 152, 153, 154, 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160, 161 , 162, 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 167, 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 , 172, 173 , 174, 175, 176, 177, 178 , 179, 180 , 181 , 188 , 196, 199 , 200, 201 , 202, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208 , 209 , 210, 211 , 212, 213 , 214, 215, 216, 217218 , 219, 220 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226 , 227, 228 , 229, 230 , 231 , 232, 233 , 234 , 235, 236, 237, 238 , 239, 240, 241 , 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247 , 248 , 249 , 250, 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 256, 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264, 265 , 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271 , 272 , 273 , 274, 275 , 276 , 277, 278 , 279 , 280, 281 , 282 , 283, 284, 285 , 286, 287, 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 292, 293, 294, 295 , 296, 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302, 303 , 304, 305, 306 , 307, 308 , 309 , 310 , 311 , 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317 , 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 , 322 , 323 , 324, 325 , 326 , 3327 , 328 , 329, 330 , 331 , 332, 333 , 334, 335 , 336, 337, 338 , 339, 340, 341 , 342, 343 , 344 , 345 , 346 , 347 , 348, 349, 350 , 351 , 352, 353 , 354 , 355, 356, 357 , 358 , 359 , 360, 361 ,361,362 ,362, 363 364, 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372 , 373, 374 , 375 , 376, 377 , 378,379, 380, 381 , 382, 383 , 384 , 385 , 386,387, 388, 389, 390 , 391 , 392 , 393 , 394 , 395, 396, 397, 398, 399 , 400, 401 , 402, 403 , 404, 405 , 406 , 407, 408 , 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415 ; 416, 417, 418 , 419 , 420, 421 , 422, 423, 424,425, 426,427 , 428, 429 , 430 , 431 , 432, 433 , 434, 435 , 436, 437,438 , 439, 440 , 441 , 442, 443 , 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450 , 451 , 452, 453 , 454 , 455 , 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461 , 462 , 463; 464 , 465, 466, 467, 468 , 469 , 470, 471 , 472,473,474,475 , 476, 477, 478 , 479 , 480, 481 , 482,483 , 484,485,486,487 , 488 , 489, 490, 491 , 492 , 493, 494, 495, 496, 497, 498 , 499 , 500, 501 , 502, 503 , 504 , 505 , 506, 507, 508, 509 , 510 , 511 , 512 , 513 , 514 , 515 , 516 , 517, 518 , 519 , 520, 521 , 522 , 523 , 524 , 525, 526 , 527 , 528, 529 , 530 , 531 , 532, 533 , 534, 535 , 536 , 537 , 538 , 539 , 540 , 541 , 542 , 543 , 544, 545, 546, 547 , 548 , 549 , 550 , 551 , 552, 553 , 554, 555, 556, 557, 558 , 559 , 560 , 561 , 562 , 563 , 564 , 565 , 566, 567, 568 , 569 , 570 , 571 , 572, 573 , 574, 575, 576 , 577, 578, 579, 580, 581 , 582 , 583 , 584 , 585 , 586 , 587, 588 , 589 , 590 , 591 , 592, 593 , 594 , 595 , 596 , 597 , 598 , 599, 600 , 601 , 602, 603 , 604, 605 , 606 ,607, 608 , 609, 610 , 611 , 612, 613 , 614, 615, 616, 617 , 618,619 , 620, 621 , 622 , 623 , 624, 625 , 626, 627, 628, 629, 630 , 631 , 632 , 633, 634, 635, 636, 637, 638,639, 640, 641 , 642, 643, 644, 645, 646, 647, 648 , 649, 650, 651 , 652, 653 , 654, 655, 656, 657, 658 , 659 , 660, 661 , 662 , 663 ,
664, 665, 666 , 667 , 668 , 669 , 670, 671 , 672 , 673 , 674,675 , 1 , 2, 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 9, 10, 11 , 12, 13 , 14, 15, 16, 17 , 18 , 19, 20,21,22, 23 , 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39,40, 41,42,43 , 85, 87 , 88 , 89, 90, 91 , 92, 93 , 95, 96, 97, 98 , 99, 100, 101 , 102, 103 , 104, 105 , 106, 107, 108 , 109, 110, 111 , 112, 113 , 114 115 , 116, 117 , 118 , 119, 120 , 121 , 122, 123 , 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131 , 132, 133 , 134, 135 , 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141 , 142, 143, 144 , 145, 146, 147, 148 , 149, 150 , 151 , 152, 153 , 154, 155 , 156, 157 , 158 , 159, 160 , 161 , 162, 163 , 164, 165 , 166, 167, 168 , 169, 170, 171 , 172 , 173 , 174, 175 , 176, 177, 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 , 182 , 183 , 184 , 185 186, 187, 188 , 189,190, 191,192, 193 , 194, 195 , 196, 197, 198 , 199, 200, 201 , 202, 203 , 204, 205, 206, 207, 208 , 209, 210, 211 , 212 , 213 , 214, 215,216,217 , 218 , 219, 220 , 221 , 222, 223 , 224 , 225, 226 , 227, 228, 229 , 230, 231 , 232, 233 , 234, 235 , 236, 237, 238 , 239, 240, 241 242, 270, 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276, 283 , 284 , 285, 286, 287,288,287, 288 , 289, 290, 291 , 292 , 293 , 294,295 ,294, 295, 296, 297 , 298, 299 , 300, 301 , 302, 303 , 304, 305 , 306, 307, 308, 309, 310 , 311 , 312, 313,314,315,316, 317, 318,319, 320, 321 , 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328 , 329, 330, 331 , 332 , 333, 334, 335, 336, 337 , 338, 4074
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[PART 11- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 676, 677, 678 , 679 , 680 , 681 , 682 , 683 , 684, 685 , 686, 687 ,
688, 689, 690 , 691 , 692, 693 , 694, 695, 696, 697, 698, 699,
700, 701 , 702 , 703 , 704, 705 , 706, 707, 708 , 709, 710, 711 ,
1177/1572 , 1402/1578 , 1436/1580 , 1457/1583 , 845 / 1607,845/ 1608, 845/1609 , 845/1610 , 845/1611 , 1133 / 1612,616/ 1613 , 1105/1614, 1105/1615, 1105/1616 .
712, 713 , 714,715, 716 , 717, 718 , 719 , 720, 721 , 722 , 723 ,
724, 725 , 726, 727 , 728 , 729, 730 , 731 , 732, 733 , 734, 735,
736, 737, 738, 739 , 740, 741 , 742 , 743 , 744, 745 , 746, 747,
11. Plot numbers to be acquired in village /Mouza - Bazari , Jurisdiction List No. 23, Police Station Pandaveswar, District Burdwan ( West Bengal )
748, 749,750 , 751,752, 753,754,755,756 , 757, 758,759 ,
760, 761 , 762, 763 , 764, 765 , 766 , 767, 768 , 769 , 770 , 771 ,
772, 773, 774,775 , 776 , 777, 778, 779 , 780, 781 , 782 , 783 ,
784, 785, 786, 787, 788 , 789 , 790, 791 , 792, 793 , 794, 795,
796, 797, 798 , 799 , 800, 801 , 802, 803, 804, 805 , 806, 807 ,
808,809,810 , 811,812 , 81.3 , 844(P) , 845 , 846, 847 , 848 , 849,
850, 851,852 , 853 , 854, 855, 856, 857, 858 , 859, 861 , 862 ,
863, 864, 865 , 866 , 867, 868, 869, 870, 871 , 872, 873 , 874 ,
875 , 876,877,878 , 879 , 830 , 881,882 , 883 , 884 , 885, 886,
887, 888 , 889 , 890 , 891 , 892 , 893 , 894 , 895 , 896, 897 , 898 ,
899, 900 , 901 , 902, 903 , 904, 905, 906, 907 , 908 , 909, 910,
911,912, 913 , 914 , 915 , 916, 917,918 , 919 , 920 , 921 , 922 ,
923 , 924, 925 , 926, 927, 9:28 , 929 , 930 , 931 , 932 , 933 , 934,
935, 936, 937, 938 , 939, 941 , 942, 943 , 944 , 945 , 946, 947,
948, 949 , 950 , 951 , 952, 9:53 , 954 , 955 , 956, 957, 958, 959 ,
960, 961 , 962 , 963 , 964 , 965, 966, 967, 968 , 969, 970, 971 ,
972, 973 , 974, 975, 976 , 977 , 978 , 979, 980, 981 , 982, 983 ,
984, 985, 986, 987, 988 , 989, 990 , 991 , 992, 993 , 994, 995,
996 , 997, 998 , 999, 1000 , 1001 , 1002 , 1003 , 1004, 1005, 1006 ,
1007, 1008 , 1009, 1010, 1011 , 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015 , 1016,
1017 , 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021 , 1022 , 1023 , 1024, 1025 , 1026 ,
1027 , 1028 , 1029, 1030 , 10:31 , 1032 , 1033, 1034, 1035 , 1036,
1037 , 1038 , 1039 , 1040, 1041 , 1042, 1043 , 1044, 1045, 1046,
1047 , 1048 , 1049 , 1050 , 1051 , 1052 , 1053 , 1054 , 1055 , 1056,
1057, 1058 , 1059 , 1060, 1061 , 1062 , 1063 , 1064, 1065 , 1066,
1067 , 1068 , 1069 , 1070, 1071 , 1072 , 1073 , 1074 , 1075 , 1076 ,
1077 , 1078 , 1079, 1080 , 1081 , 1082 , 1083 , 1084 , 1085, 1086,
1103 , 1104, 1105, 1106, 1107 , 1109 , 1110, 1111 , 1112 , 1113 ,
1114, 1115, 1116, 1117, 118 , 1119 , 1120, 1121 , 1122, 1123 ,
1124, 1125 , 1126, 1127, 1128 , 1129, 1130, 1131 , 1133 , 1134,
1135, 1136 , 1137 , 1138, 1139 , 1140, 1141 , 1142, 1143 , 1144,
1145, 1146, 1147, 1148, 1149, 1150 , 1151 , 1152 , 1153 , 1154 ,
1155 , 1156, 1157, 1158 , 1159 , 1160 , 1161 , 1162, 1163 , 1164,
1165, 1166, 1167 , 1168, 1169, 1170 , 1171 , 1172 , 1173 , 1174,
3(P), 30(P) , 31 , 32( P) 33 , 34 ( P ), 35 , 36 ( P), 37( P), 38 (P) , 39,40(P), 41 (P) , 42(P) , 43 (P) , 44, 45 (P) , 46 , 47 (P), 53 (P), 64( P), 68(P) , 69 , 70(P ), 71 (P ) , 72( P) , 73 ( P ) , 74(P ) , 75( P) , 76( P ), 77(P) , 79(P), 156, 157(P), 167(P) , 168 , 169 (P) , 170(P), 171 (P) , 172(P), 174(P) , 177(P) , 178 , 179 , 180 , 385( P) , 386( P) , 412 (P), 413, 414, 415, 422, 432, 433 , 434( P) , 435 , 436, 437( P) , 438 (P) , 442 ( P) , 443 ,444(P), 445 ,446, 447, 448 , 449, 450, 451,452,453, 454, 455,456,457,458 , 459, 460, 461 , 462, 463, 464, 465 , 466 , 467, 468,469,470,471,472,473,474,475,476,477,478 , 481,482,483,484 , 485 , 486, 487, 488 , 489, 490, 491,492,493 , 494,495,496,497, 498 , 499 , 500, 501 , 502 , 503 , 504 , 505 , 506, 507, 508 , 509 , 510 , 511 , 512, 513 , 514 , 515 , 516 , 517,518,519 , 520,521,522 , 523 , 524 , 525 , 526 , 527 , 528 , 529,530,531,532 , 533, 534, 535, 536, 537 , 538 , 539 , 540 , 541 , 544, 545 , 546, 547, 548, 549,550,551,552,553,554,555,556, 557,558,559,560, 561,562, 563 , 564, 565, 566 , 567 , 568 , 569 , 570 , 571,572 , 573 , 574,575,576,577, 578 , 579 , 580 , 581 , 582(P ) , 583 ( P) , 589 (P), 590 ( P ) , 591 , 592 , 593 , 594, 595 , 596 , 597 , 598 , 599, 600, 601 , 602, 603 , 604 , 605, 606, 607, 608 , 609,610,611,612,613,614, 615,616,617,618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , 622, 623 , 624 , 525 , 626,627, 629,630,631,632 , 633 , 634, 636 , 637, 645 , 646, 664 , 665 , 666, 667,669, 670 , 671 , 672 , 673 , 674 ( P ) , 675,676,677,678,679, 680, 681 (P) , 682( P), 684 ( P), 685 (P) , 1446, 58/1785(P ) , 3/1808 , 434/1809,434/1810,434/ 1811,489/ 1813,489 / 1814,489/1815 , 560/1818 , 639/1819 , 639/1820 , 639/1821 , 639/1822 , 536/1823,536/1824,536/ 1825,536/1826, 536/1827, 536/1828 , 536/1829, 536/1830 , 525/ 1831,524/ 1832 , 524/1833 , 524/1834 , 524/1835, 524/1836 , 491/1837 , 491/1838 , 491/1839,491/1840, 492/1841,508/1842 , 508/1843 , 505/1844 , 505/1845, 502/1846, 502/1847 , 500/1848 , 501/1849 , 501/1850 , 501 /1851,501/ 1852 , 501/1853 , 501 /1854,501/1855,501/1856, 501/1857 , 501/1858 , 501/1859,3/1860, 489/ 1861,3 /1863 , 475/1864,434/1865 ,434/ 1866( P) , 578/1874 , 501/1875 , 501/1876 .
1175, 1176, 1177, 1178 , 1179 , 1180, 1181 , 1182, 1183 , 1184,
1185, 1186, 1187, 1188, 1189, 1190, 1191 , 1192, 1193 , 1194,
1195 , 1196, 1197, 1198, 1199 , 1200, 1201 , 1202, 1203 , 1204,
12.Plot numbers to be acquired in village /Mouza - Sankarpur , Jurisdiction . List No. 28 , Police Station Pandaveswar , District Burdwan ( West Bengal)
1205, 1206 , 1207, 1208 , 1209 , 1210, 1211 , 1212, 1213 , 1214,
1215 , 1216, 1217, 1218 , 1219, 1220 , 1221 , 1222 , 1223 , 1224 ,
1225, 1226, 1227, 1228 , 1229, 1230 , 1231 , 1232, 1233 , 1234 ,
1235 , 1236 , 1237 , 1238, 1239 , 1240 , 1241 , 1242, 1243 , 1244,
1245, 1246 , 1247, 1248, 1249 , 1250, 1251 , 1252 , 1253 , 1254 ,
1255 , 1256, 1257, 1258 , 1259 , 1260 , 1261 , 1262, 1263 , 1264 ,
1265 , 1266, 1267, 1268 , 1269, 1270 , 1271 , 1272 , 1273 , 1274,
1275 , 1276, 1277 , 1278 , 1279 , 1280, 1281 , 1282, 1283 , 1284 ,
イ 1285 , 1286 , 1287, 1288 , 1289 , 1290, 1291 , 1292 , 1293 , 1294,
1295 , 1296 , 1297, 1298, 1299 , 1300, 1301 , 1302 , 1303 , 1304 ,
1306, 1308 , 1309, 1310, 1311 , 1312, 1313 , 1314, 1315, 1316,
1317 , 1318 , 1319, 1320, 1321 , 1322, 1323 , 1324, 1325, 1326,
1327, 1331 , 1332, 1333 , 1334, 1335 , 1336 , 1337 , 1338 , 1339,
1340 , 1341 , 1342 , 1343 , 1344, 1345 , 1346 , 1347 , 1348 , 1349 ,
1353( P) , 1354 , 1355 , 1356 , 1357 , 1358 , 1359 , 1360 , 1361 ,
1362, 1363 , 1364 , 1365 , 1415, 1416, 871/1524 , 843/1526,748/
1528, 386/1529, 768/1530 , 768/1531 , 5/1532, 8/1533 , 35/1534,
662/1535 , 708/1536 , 715/1537 , 740/1538 , 741/1539 , 743/
1540, 747/1541,745/1542 , 742/1543 , 808/1544 , 903/1546,
1558,845/
1128/1547 , 1150/1548 , 1213/1549 , 432/1550 , 844/ 1559, 261/1561 , 261/1562 , 419/1563 , 262/1564, 262/1565,
82/1566 , 378/1567,971 / 1568,976/ 1569,982/ 1570 , 921/1571 ,
489,490,611,612 , 614 , 615,616,617,618,619,620, 621 , 622, 625 , 626, 627, 628 , 629, 630, 631 , 632 , 633 , 634,635, 636 , 637,638,639, 640 , 641 , 642, 643 , 644, 645 , 646,647, 648, 649,650,651,652, 653, 654, 655, 656, 657, 658 , 659 , 660 , 661 , 662, 663 , 664, 665, 666, 667, 668, 669 , 670 , 671,672,673,674 , 675,676,677,678 , 679, 680, 681 , 682, 683 , 684,685,686,687, 688, 689, 690, 691 , 692 , 693 , 694, 695 , 696 , 697,698, 699,700, 701, 703 , 709 , 710, 711 , 712 , 713 , 714,715,716,774,780,781 , 782,783,784,785,786, 787, 788 , 789, 790, 791,792,793,794, 795,796,797, 798 , 799, 800 , 801 , 802 , 803 , 804, 805 , 806, 807 , 808 ,8,809 , 810( P), 817,818 , 819 , 820, 859 , 860 , 861,862,863 , 864, 865 , 867 , 868 , 869 , 870, 871,872, 873,874,875,876,877, 878,879,880,881 , 882 , 883 , 884, 885 , 886 , 887 , 888 , 889,890, 891,892,893,894 , 895 , 896 , 897, 898 , 899 , 900, 901 , 902 , 903 , 904, 905, 906, 907, 908, 909, 910, 911,912,913,914,915,916, 917,918,919,920 ,3,919 , 920, 921 , 922 , 923 , 924 , 925, 926,927,928,929 , 930,931,932, 933 , 934, 935 , 936 , 937, 938, 939, 940, 941,942, 943, 944, 945 , 946, 947, 948 , 949 , 950 , 951 , 952, 953,954, 955, 956, 957,958,959, 960 , 961 , 962, 963, 964, 965 , 966 , 967, 968 , 969,970,971,972,973,974,975,976,977,978,979,980,981 , 982,983,984 , 985 , 986 , 987 , 988 , 989, 990 , 991 , 992, 993 , 994 , [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
995, 996, 997, 998 , 999 , 1000 , 1001 , 1002, 1003 , 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007 , 1008 , 1009 , 1010 , 1011 , 1012, 1013 , 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018 , 1019, 1020, 1021 , 1025 (P) , 1029 , 1031 (P) 1032, 1033 , 1034, 1035, 1036, 1037 , 1038 , 1039, 1040 , 1041 , 1042, 1043, 1044, 1045 , 1046, 1048, 1049, 1050 , 1051 , 1052, 1053 , 1054, 1055 , 1056 , 1057 , 1058 , 1059, 1060 , 1061 , 1062, 1063, 1064, 1065, 1066 , 1067 , 1068 , 1069 , 1070 , 1071 , 1072, 1073 , 1074, 1075 , 1076 , 1077, 1078 , 1079, 1080, 1081 , 1082, 1083 , 1084, 1085 , 1086 , 1087 , 1088 , 1089, 1090 , 1091 , 1092, 1093, 1094, 1095 , 1096, 1206(P) , 1213 , 1214, 1215 , 1216, 1217 , 1218 , 1219, 1220, 1221 , 1222, 1223 , 1224, 1225 , 1226, 1227 , 1228 , 1229, 1230, 1231 (P), 671/1268 , 673/1269, 677/1270 , 681 / 1271,687/ 1272,687/1273,936/ 1274,791 / 1275, 874/1277 , 1086/ 1362, 1246/1379(P) .
BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION ( J. L. Jurisdiction List ) Plan Plate- A
A1 -A2 Line starts from point Al North West point of plot No. 3320 of Mouza Kendra Khottadi J. L. No. 1 and passes along north line of Plot No.3320, middle of plot No. 3320 , 3106, 3125 , northern line of plot No. 3126 , middle of Plot No. 3128 , 3122 , Northern line ofPlot No. 3139 , middle of Plot No. 3137 , Northern line of Plot No. 3152 , 3153 , Westem line ofPlot No. 3153 , 3154, 3150 , middle of Plot No. 3150 , 3149 , Northern line of Plot No. 3158 , 3165 , middle of Plot No. 3143 , 2315 , Northern line of Plot No. 3168 , middle of Plot No. 3169 , 3170 , 3187 , 3183,2822 , 3190 , Northern line ofPlot No. 3225, 3228 , 3229 , 3231 , middle of Plot No. 3235 , 3237 of mouza Kendra Khottadi J. L. No. 1 and passes common boundary of mouza Kendra Khottadi J. L. No. I and mouza Bilpahari J. L. No. 2 and passes along the middle of Plot No. 1149 , 1167 , 1168 , 1195, 1194 , Northern line of Plot No. 1193 , 1191 , 1190, 1189, 1188 , middle of plot No. 1219 , 1186, Northem line ofplot No. 1239, middle ofplot No. 1241 , 1186, and meets atpoint A2 , middle point on eastern line of plotNo. 1186 of mouza Bilpahari J.L. No. 2 as delineated on plan .
A2-A3 Line starts from A2 middle point on eastern line ofplot No. 1186 of Mouza Bilpahari , J. L. No. 2 and passes along the eastern line of plot No. 1186 ofmouza Bilpahari J. L. No. 2, passes along the eastern line of plot No. 956 of mouza Dalurbandh J. L. No. 4 and meet at point A3 south east point of plot No. 956 of mouza Dalurbandh J. L. No. 4 as delineated on plan .
A3-A4 Line starts at point A3 south east point of plot No. 956 of mouza Dalurbandh , J. L. No.4 and passes along the northern line and middle of plotNo. 957 , northern line ofplot No. 982, middle ofplot No. 957 , 1161 , 1179 and meets at point A4north east point ofplot No. 1179 ( common point ofplate No. A and plate No. B ) ofmouza Dalurbandh J. L. No.4 as delineated on plan .
PlanPlate - B
44-A5 Line starts at point A4 north east point of plot No. 1179 ( common point of Plate- A and Plate-
4075
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008 / श्रावण 11 , 1930
B) ofMouza Dalmbandh , J. LL . No. 4 and passes along northern line ofplots No. 1182, 1191 , 1192, 1193 , middle of plot No. 1285 , 1286 , eastern line ofplot No. 1286 , northern line ofplotNo. 1283 , middle ofplot No. 1281 , 1353 , 1355 , 1356, 1358, 1359 , 1363 , 1364 , 1840 and meets at plate A5 north east point of plot No. 1840 of mouza Dalmbandh J. L. No.4 as delineated on plan.
A5-A6 Line starts from point A5 north east point of plotNo. 1840 of mouza Dalmbandh J. L. No. 4 and passes along eastern line ofplot No. 1840 , 1826, and meets at point A6 south east point of 1826 of mouza Dalmbandh J. L. No. 4 as delineated on plan .
A6-A7 Line starts from point A6 South East point of plotNo. 1826 of mouza Dalurbandh J. L... No. 4 and passes along middle point of 1381 , 1466 , northern line of plot No. 1444 , middle of plot No. 1443 , northern line of plot No. 1561 , 1844 , 1562 , middle of plot No. 1466, 2087 , 1466 , 1589 of mouza Dalurband J. L. No. 4 and passes through common boundary of mouza Dalurband J. L. No.4 and mouza Chakkarala J. L. No. 11 and passes through middle point ofplot No. 90 of mouza Chakkarala J. L. No. 11 , middle point ofplot No. 90 , 185 , 163 , 161 , 160 , eastern line of plot No. 157 , 158 and meets at point A 7 north east point of plot No. 158 of mouza Chakkarala J. L. No. 11 as delineated on plan.
A7-A8 Line starts from point A7 North East point of plotNo. 158 of mouza Chakkarala J. L. No. 11 and passes along the west line of plot No. 63 of mouza Chakkarala J. L. No. 11 and again passes common bundary line of mouza Chakkarala J. L. No. 11 and mouza Joalbhanga J. L. No .. 12 and passes through middle of plot No. 1 , 2 eastern line of plot No. 3 and meets at point No. A8 south east plot No. 3 of mouza Joalbbanga J. L. No. 12 as delineated on plan.
A8 -A9 Line starts from point A8 south east point of plot No. 3 of mouza Joalbhanga J. L. No. 12 and passes middle of plot No. 4 and meets at point A9 north east point of plot No. 4 mouza Joalbhanga J. I.. No. 12 as delineated on plan .
A9-A10 Line starts from point A9 north east point of plot No. 4 of mouza Joalbhanga J. L. No. 12 and passes along east line ofplot No. 9 , 1261, 10, 22 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 1573 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 1497, 1498 , 1499 , 1500 , 1501 , 1502, 1251 , 1463, 1219 , 1612 of mouza Joalbhanga J. L. No.12 and passes through common boundary line of mouza Joalbhanga J. L. No. 12 and mouza Bhatmura J. L. No. 13 and passes through the eastern line of plot No. 31 , 28, 259 , 260 , 79 , 80 , 330, 86, 87 , 91 , 93 , 95 , 96, 97, 122 , 126, 127 , 134 , and meets at point A10 south west point of plot No. 134 of mouza Bhatmura J. L. No. 13 and as delineated on plan .
A10-A11 Line starts from point A10 south west of plot No. 134 , ofmouza Bhatmura J. L. No. 13 , and passes through common boundary of mouza Bhatmura J. L. No. 13 and mouza Konardih J. I ..
4076
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
14 and passes through southern line of plot No. 36, 39 , 3010 , 41 , of mouza Konardihi J. L. No. 14 middle of plot No. 42 western line of plot No. 3030 , southern line of plot No. 3030 southern line of plot No. 46 , 45 , 117 , middle line of plot No. 119 , 115, western line of plot No. 115 , eastern line of plot No. 139 , southern line of plot No. 139, 137 , 135 , 145 , 155 , 156 , middle point of plot No. 261 , western line of 261 southern line of plot No. 3058 , 258 , 257 , middle point of 256 , 264 , and passes along common boundary of mouza Konardihi J. L. No. 14 and mouza Nabagram J. L. No. 20 and passes along southern line of plot No. 898 , 900, ofmouza Nabagram J. L. No. 20 and meets atpoint All ( common point of plan plate B and plan plate C) south west point of plot No. 900 of mouza Nabagram J. L. No. 20 as delineated on plan.
PlanPlate - C
A11 - A12 Line starts at point All ( common point ofplan plate B and plan plate C) south west point of plot No. 900 of mouza Nabagram J. L. No.20 and passes along southern line of plot No. 929, middle of 900 , southern line of plotNo. 926, 927, middle of plot No. 925 , 921 , southern line of plot No. 921 , 917 , 914, 915 , 977, 978 , 1625, 979 , 1014 , western line ofplot No. 1014, southern line of 1016 , 1017, 1031 , 1030 , 1029 , western line ofplot No. 1029, 1028 , 1027 , 1023 , 978 , southern line of plot No. 685 , 688 , 665 , 664, 663 , 662,661,654, 656, 655,653 , 651 western line of plot No. 651 , 652 , 1802 , southern line of plot No. 649 , 647, 638 , 637, 510 , eastemline of plot No. 510 , southern line of plot No. 517 , southern line ofplot No. 517, 519 , 523 , western line of plot No. 522 , middle of plot No. 624, southern line ofplot No. 624 and passes along common mouza boundary of Nabagram J. L. No. 20 and Shankarpur J. L. No. 28 and meets pointA12middle point on eastern line of plot No. 1231 of mouza Shankarpur J. L. No. 28 as delineated on plan .
A12- A13 Line starts from point A12 middle point on eastern line of plot No. 1231 of mouza Shankarpur J. L. No. 28 west line of plotNo. 1231 , middle of plot No. 1379 , south line ofplot No. 1229 , middle of plot No. 1379 , southern line of plot No. 1215 , southern line of plot No. 1215, 1214 , 1213 , 1206 , western line ofplotNo. 1206, 1217 , 1218 , 1219 , southern line ofplot No. 1093 , 1095 , 1096, 1091 , 1090, 1083 , 1065 , 1064 , 1063 , 1062 , 1061 , 1048 , 1049, 1043 , 1036, 1035, middle ofplot No. 1031 , southern line of plot No. 1033 , 1032, middle of plot No. 1025, southern line of plot No. 1021 , 489, 490, and meets at point A13 south west of plot No. 490 ofmouza Shankarpur plot No. 28 as delineated on plan.
A13 -A14 Line starts from point A13 South West point ofplot No. 490 of mouza Shankarpur , J. L. No. 28 and passes along the western line of plot No.490, nothern line ofplot No. 490 , 489, 490 ,
[ PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) | 489, western line of plot 628 , 627, 625 , northern line of plot No. 625 , 635 , 636 , western line of plotNo. 621 , 622 , northern line of plot No. 622, 611,614, 701 , 703 , 709 , 715 , 787,774,781,780, 795,809 , 817,819 , 821 , 867 , 863 , 862 , 860, 859 , and meets at point A14 north east point of plot No. 859 of mouza Shankarpur J. L. No. 28 as delineated on plan .
A14- A15 Line starts from point A14 North East point of plot No. 859 of Shankarpur mouza , J. L. No. 28 and passes along the west line of plot No. 271 , 270, 269, 1686 ofmouza Nabagram , J. L. No. 20, south line ofplot No. 1750 , 205, 204, 202 , 193 , 192 , 191 , and meets at point A15 South West point ofplot No. 190 of mouza Nabagram , J. L. No. 20 as delineated on plan .
A15- A16 Line starts from point A15 South West point ofplot No. 190 of mouza Nabagram , J. L. No. 20 and passes along the west line of plot No. 190, 189 , 183 , 182 , 181 and meets the point A16 North West point of plot No. 181 of mouza Nabagram , J. L. No. 20 as delineated on plan .
A16 -A17 Line starts form point A16 North West point ofplot No. 181 of mouza Nabagram J. L. No. 20 and passes along the north line of plot No. 2341 , west line of plot No. 2280 , 2281 , north lineofplot No. 2281 , 2278 , 2282, 175, middle of plot No. 164, 151 , north line of plot No. 133 , 134, 785 , 791,790, 851 and meets the point A17 NorthEast point of plot No. 851 ( common point ofplate - C and plate -B ) of mouza Nabagram , J. L. No. 20 as delineated on plan .
Plan Plate -B
A17-A18 Line starts from point A17 North East point of plot No. 851 (common point of plate C and plate-B ) of mouza Nabagram , J. L. No. 20 and passes along the north line of plot No. 856 , 857, 871,875 , 879 , 880 , of mouza Nabagram , J. L. No. 20 , east line of plot No. 880 ofmouza Nabagram , J. L. No. 20 , north line of plot No. 238 , 248 of mouza Konardihi J. L. No. 14 middle ofplot No. 242, north line of plot No. 244, 181 , 180 , 168 , 178 , 173 , 172 , 145 , 96 of mouza Konardihi , J. L. No. 14, west line ofplot No. 94, 92 and meets at point A 18 south west point of plotNo. 83 of mouza Konardihi , J. L. No. 14 as delineated on plan .
A18 - A19 Line starts from point A18 south west point of plotNo. 83 of mouza Konardihi , J. L. No. 14 and passes along the southern line of plot No. 79,73 , 3038 , 3052 , 3054 , 3052 , north line ofplot No. 3052 of mouza Konardihi , J. L. No. 14 , passes along common mouza bomumy of Konardihi J. L. No. 14 and Nabagram J. L. No. 20, southern line of plot No. 1967 , 1927 , middle ofplot No. 2033 , south line of plot No. 2032, westline of plot No. 2032 , south line of plot No. 2026, 1987, 1989 , 1990 , 1993 , 1994, 1996 , 1997, 2000 , west line of plot No. 2000 , south line ofplot No. 2003 , 2004, middle plot No. 2242 and meets at point A19 middle point of west line of plot No. 2242 of mouza Nabagram , J. I.. No. 20 as delineated on plan .
4077
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
A25 south east point of plot No. 680 of mouza Bazari J. L. No. 23 as delineated on plan .
A19-A20 Line starts from point A19 middle point of West line ofplot No. 2242 of mouza Nabagram , J. L. No. 20 and passes along the south line of plot No. 398 , 270 , 272 , 273 of mouza Bhaluka, J. L. No. 21 , west line ofplot No. 273, 276 , south line of plot No. 275 and meets the point A20 SouthWest point of plot No. 275 ( common pointof plate B and plate A) ofmouza Bhaluka, J. L. No. 21 as delineated on plan.
Plan- Plate A
A25- A26 Line starts from point A25 South east of plot No. 680 of mouza Bazari J. L. No. 23 as passes along the southern line of plot No. 680 , middle ofplot No. 681 , 682, 684, 685, 674, 592, 591,590, 583, 582, western line of plot No. 580, middle of plot No. 480, western line of plot No. 480, southern line of plot No. 444 , middle of plot No. 444, western line of plot No. 443 , middle of plot No. 438 , 437, 434, western line ofplotNo. 432and meets at point A26 , north east point of plotNo. 1812 of mouza Bazari J. L. No. 23 as delineated on plan.
A26- A27 Line starts from point A26 north east point of plot No. 1812 of mouza Bazari J. I .. No. 23 and passes along the southern line ofplot No. 422 , 415, 414, 413 , middle ofplot No. 412, 1785 , 53 and meets at point A27 south west point of plot No. 53 of mouza Bazari J. LL . No. 23 as delineated on plan .
A20 -A21 Line starts from point A20 South West point of plotNo. 275 ( common point of plate B & plate A) of mouza Bhaluka , J. L. No. 21 and passes along the south line ofplot No. 283, 281 ofmouza Bhaluka , J.L. No. 21 , west line of plot No. 281 , north line ofplot No. 280 , 243 , east line ofplot No. 95, south line of plot No. 95 , 93 , 92, 85 , 86 , 35, 43, west line of plot No. 43 , 41 , south line of plotNo.40 and meets the point A21 South West pointofplot No. 40 of mouza Bhaluka , J. L. No. 21 as delineated on plan.
A21 - A22 Line starts from point A21 South West point A27-A28 Line starts from point A27 south west point of plot No. 53 of mouza Bazari J. L. No. 23 and passes along the western line of plot No. 53 , 36, middle ofplot No. 36 , 34 and meets at point A28 south east point of plot No. 31 of mouza Bazari J. L. No. 23 as delineated on plan .
A28- A29 Line starts from point A28 south east point of ofplot No. 40 of mouza Bhaluka , J. L. No. 21 and passes along the south line of plot No. 813 , 812, 1526 of mouza Sonepur , J. L. No. 22, middle line ofplot No. 844, east line ofplot No. 945, 947, south line of plot No. 947, 1415 , 1084, 1085 , 1086 , west line of plot No. 1086, 1081 , 1076 , 1075 , 1074 , 1071 , south line of plöt No.1104, 1103, 1116 , east line ofplot No. 1355, 1357, 1358 , 1359 , 1360, 1362, 1361 , 1365 , south line ofplot No. 1365, 1349 , west line ofplot No. 1349 , 1348 of mouza Sonepur , J. L. No. 22 and meets at point A22 south west point of plot No. 1347 of mouza Sonepur J. L. No. 22 as delineated on plan .
plot No. 31 of mouza Bazari J. L. No. 23 and passes along the middle line of plot No. 34 , 38 , 40,42,43 ,47,46,45,79,77,76,75,74,73,72,71 , 70, 64 , 68 , 156, 157, eastern line ofplot No. 168 , 167, middle of plot No. 170, 172 , 174 , 177; eastern line ofplot No. 178 , 180 , and meetsat point A29 south east point of plot No. 180 of mouza Bazari J. L. No. 23 as delineated on plan.
A22- A23 Line starts from the point A22 South West point ofplot No. 1347 of mouza Sonepur , J. L. No. 22 and passes along the eastern line of plot No. 1330, 1329 , 1328 and meets the point A23 South Westpoint ofplot No. 1257 of mouza Sonepur, J. L. No. 22 as delineated on plan.
A29-A30 Line starts from point A29 south east point of plot No. 180 of mouza Bazari J. L.. No. 23 and passes along southern line of plot No. 180 , 179 and meets at point A30 south west point of plot No. 179 of mouza Bazari J. LL . No. 23 as delineated on plan.
A23 - A24 Line starts from point A23 South West point
A30-A31 Line starts from point A30 south west point plot No. 179 of mouza Bazari J. L. No. 23 and passes along the western line of plot No. 179, middle ofplot No. 174 , 171 , 170 , 169 , western line ofplot No. 168 , 156 , 169 , middle ofplotNo. 170 , 171 , 172, 173 , 174 , 177, 179 , 45, 44 , 43 , 41 , 30, 32, and meets at point A3 I north cast point ofplot No. 32 of mouza Bazari J. L. No. 23 as delineated on plan.
A31 -AI
ofplot No. 1257 of mouza Sonepur , J. L. No. 22 and passes ' along the south line of plot No. 1254, western line of plot No. 1254 , 1253 , southern line of plot No. 204 , 202 , eastern , southern , western line of plot No. 199 , southern line of plot No. 154 , eastern line of plot No. 1564, 196 , southern line of plot No. 196, 171 , eastern line of plot No. 172 , 173 , 181 , 188 , southern line ofplot No. 188 of mouza Sonepur , J. L. No. 22 and meets at point A24 South East pointof plot No. 181 of mouza Sonepur , J. L.. No. 22 as delineated on plan .
Line starts from point A31 north east point of plotNo. 32 of mouza Bazari J. L. No. 23 and passes along the southern line ofplot No. 3079 of mouza Kendra Khottadi J. LL . No. 1 and. passes along middle ofplot No. 3079 , and meets ať original point Al south west point of plot No.3320 of mouza Kendra Khottadi J. L. No.1 as delineated on plan.
[F. No. 43015/9/2005 -PRIW - I ( Vol.II) | M.SI AHABUDEEN, Under Secy .
A24- A25 Line starts from point A24 South east point of plot No. 181 of mouza Sonepur J. L. No. 22 passes along the eastern line of plot No. 1446 ofmouza Bazari J. L. No. 23 , southern line of plotNo. 1446, 636, 637, middle ofplot No. 635, eastern line ofplot No. 645 , 646 , southern line ofplot No. 646, 633 , 664, 665, 667, 666 , 672, 669, middle of plot No. 668 , 680 and meets at point
▼
2745 G1/08-4 4078
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय
( उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 4 जनवरी , 2008
का.आ. 2033.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट तथा माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) और बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स भसीन हेल्थप्रोडक्ट्स प्रा.लि.; 112 - ए, टेगोर गार्डन , जालंधर-144002 , पंजाब द्वारा विनिर्मित सामान्य यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले ' बी आर ' श्रृंखला के एनालॉग सूचक सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( मैकेनिकल व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " सुवर्णा " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/325 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
SUVARN
उक्त मॉडल एक मैकेनिकल स्प्रिंग आधारित एनालॉग सूचक सहित अस्वचालित तोलन है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 130 किलो ग्राम और न्यूनतम क्षमता 10 किलो ग्राम है । इसका सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल । किलो ग्राम है । तोल का परिणाम डायलं द्वारा प्रदर्शित होता है । सीलिंग स्टेम्पिंग प्लेट पर मशीन के तल पर की जाती है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का स्कीमेटिक डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण-पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के 'लए 100 से 1000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 100 किलोग्राम से अधिक और 200 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10% , 2× 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 167 )/2007 ]
आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4079
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
(Department of Consumer Affairs )
New Delhi , the 4th January , 2008
S.O. 2033. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of model of non- automatic weighing instrument with analogue indication (mechanical person weighing machine ) of " BR " series of ordinary accuracy ( Accuracy class III ) belonging to ordinary accuracy class (Accuracy Class - IV ) with brand name " SUVARNA " ( herein after referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Bhaseen Health Products Pvt . Ltd. , 112 - A, Tagore Garden , Jalandhar - 144002 , Punjab andwhich is assigned the aproval mark IND/ 09 /07 /325 ;
The said model is a mechanical spring based non - automatic weighing instrument with analogue indication of maximum capacity of 130kg . and minimum capacity of 10kg. The value of verification scale interval ' e ' is 1 kg. The result of measurement is indicated by a dial .
The sealing is done at the bottom of the machine on the stamping plate itself. A typical schematic digram of sealing provision of the model is given above .
Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 100kg . and upto 200kg . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 1000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' c ' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM - 21 ( 167)/20071
R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4080
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली , 20 मार्च , 2008
का.आ. 2034.--केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट तथा माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स पुलसार टैक्नोलोजिज ( इंडिया ) प्रा.लि. , 147/जी , 10 वां मैन , तीसरा ब्लाक , कोरमंगला , बंगलौर -560034 द्वारा विनिर्मित " 2020 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित टैक्स किराया मीटर के माडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " पुलसार " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 07/ 2008 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
税
MODEL 2020
WAITING TIME
PULSAR FARE METER RUPEES
PAISE
RATE
DISTANCE
Pulsar Techro egestate St No 0610141
FARE
Bangelore-563034
1274 /Km
HIRED
TIME
EXTRAS
FUNC
MADE IN INDIA STATS/ PRINT
उक्त मॉडल अंकक सूचन सहित टैक्सी किराया मीटर है जो समय और दूरी नापने का उपकरण है । यह यात्रा के किसी भी क्षण यात्री द्वारा संदेय प्रभार को निरंतर जोड़ता रहता है और उपदर्शित करता रहता है । यात्रा के दौरान कतिपय विनिर्दिष्ट चाल से ऊपर और विनिर्दिष्ट चाल के नीचे चली गई दूरी के किराए को देय करने का फंक्शन है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) मीटर की रीडिंग उपदर्शित करता है । " के " घटक 1274 पल्स/कि.मी . है ।
स्टांपिंग प्लेट के मुद्र'कन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 94) /2007]
आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4081
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008 / श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 20th March , 2008
S.O. 2034. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of a Taxi Fare Meter with digital indication of ' 2020 ' series with brand name " PULSAR " (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Pulsar Technologies ( India) Pvt . Ltd. , 147/G, 10th Main , 3rd Block , Koramangala , Bangalore - 560 034 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/07/208 .
ATE
PAISI
PULSAR FARE MITER RUPEES
0610141 1274K
The said model is a Taxi Fare Meter with digital indication incorporated with a distance and time measuring device. It totalizes continuously and indicates at any moment of the journey , the charges payable by the passenger . The fare to pay is a function of the distance travelled above a certain specified speed and the time elapsed below a specified speed during the journey . The reading of the meter is indicated by Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) . The ' k ' factor of the instrument is 1274 pulses per kilometer .
In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its materials , accuracy, design , circuit diagram , working principle etc. before or after sale .
[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 94 )/2007 ]
R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4082
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 27 मार्च , 2008
का.आ. 2035.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट तथा माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) और बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सरटोरियस मकेट्रानिक्स प्रा. लि. , 10 , तीसरा फेज , पिन्या इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , बंगलौर -560058 , कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एमआईआरएएस- डी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सरटोरियस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/07/483 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा . है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टिल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सीलिंग उपकरण के तल में और ऊपर के ढक्कन में बायीं और दायीं ओर छेद करके की जाती है और इन छेदों के आर पार एक सील वायर निकाली जाती है । उपकरण के दोनों छोरों पर सीलिंग वायर पर एक चपटी लीड सील लगाई जाती है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का एक विशिष्ट सीमेटिक डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 % या 5 × 10 % , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 248 )/2007]
आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4083
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008 / श्रावण 11 , 1930
II- [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 27th March , 2008
S.O. 2035. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of " MIRAS - D " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " Sartorious " (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Sartorious Mechatronics India Pvt . Ltd. , 10 , 3rd Phase , Peenya Industrial Area, Bangalore - 560058 , Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /07 / 483 ;
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 200kg and minimum capacity of400g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 20g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The liquid crystal display (LCD) indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230V , 50Hz alternative current power supply . The model is also having facility to convert kg to litre through software .
Thesealing isdone by making a hole at the bottom plate and the upper cover of the indicator from the left side and fasten a leaded wire for receiving a verification seal . A typical schematic diagram of the sealing arrangement of the model has been given above .
Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 5000kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' c ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10 or 5× 10% , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM - 21 ( 248 )/ 20071
R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4084
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[PART 11- SEC . 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली , 27 मार्च , 2008
का.आ. 2036.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सरटोरियस मकेट्रानिक्स प्रा. लि. , 10 , तीसरा फेज , पिन्या इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , बंगलौर -560058 , कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " एमआईआरएएस-टीएच " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सरटोरियस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/07/479 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त माडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है , सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 2.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टिल डिस्प्ले ( एल सी डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सीलिंग उपकरण के तल में और ऊपर के ढक्कन में बायीं और दायीं ओर छेद करके की जाती है और इन छेदों के आर पार एक सील वायर निकाली जाती है । उपकरण के दोनों छोरों पर सीलिंग वायर पर एक चपटी लीड सील लगाई जाती है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का एक विशिष्ट सीमेटिक डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में तथा 100 मि.ग्रा. अथवा उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 % , 2 ×10 अथवा 5 × 10 , के हैं, जहां पर ' के' धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।
| फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 248 ) / 2007]
आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4085
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 27th March , 2008
S.O. 2036. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with digital indication of " MIRAS - TH " series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - 11 ) and with brand name "Sartorious " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Sartorious Mechatronics India Pvt . Ltd. , 10 ,, 3rd Phase, Peenya Industrial Area, Bangalore - 560058 , Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /07 /479 ;
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( c) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The liquid crystal display ( LCD ) indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply .
The sealing is done by making a hole at the bottom plate and the upper cover of the indicator from the left side and fasten a leaded wire for receiving a verification seal . A typical schematic diagram of the sealing arrangement of the model has been given above .
Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[ F. No. WM - 21 (248 )/2007 ]
R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 2745 G1/08-5 4086
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) |
नई दिल्ली, 27 मार्च , 2008
का.आ. 2037. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नींचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सरटोरियस मकेट्रानिक्स प्रा. लि. , 10 , तीसरा फेज , पिनया इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , बंगलौर -560058 , द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एमआईआरएएस - टीएम " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सरटोरियस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/07/480 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टिल डिस्प्ले ( एल सी'डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सीलिंग उपकरण के तल में और ऊपर के ढक्कन में बायीं और दायीं ओर छेद करके की जाती है और इन छेदों के आर - पार एक सील वायर निकाली जाती है । उपकरण के दोनों छोरों पर सीलिंग वायर पर एक चपटी लीड सील लगाई जाती है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का एक विशिष्ट सीमेटिक डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्नमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में तथा 5 ग्राम अथवा उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1× 10 , 2 × 10 अथवा 5 × 10% , के हैं , जहां पर ' के ' धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 248 )/2007 |
आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4087 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 27th March, 2008
S.O. 2037. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " MIRAS - TM " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name "Sartorious" (herein referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/ s . Sartorious Mechatronics India Pvt. Ltd. , 10 , 3rd Phase , Peenya Industrial Area , Bangalore - 560058 , Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /07 /480 ;
Thesaid model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The liquid crystal display ( LCD) indicates the weighing result. The instruments operates on 230V , 50Hz alternative current power supply.
The sealing is done by making a hole at the bottom plate and the upper cover of the indicator from the left side and fasten a leaded wire for receiving a verification seal . A typical schematic diagram of the sealing arrangement of the model has been given above .
Further , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10,2 × 10% or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 248 )/2007 |
R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 4088
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 27 मार्च , 2008
का.आ. 2038.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सरटोरियस मेकेट्रानिक्स इंडिया प्रा. लि. , 10 , फेज -3 , पिनया इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, बंगलौर-560058 , कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " एमआईआरएएस-पीएच " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सरटोरियस " है । ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/07/481 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त माडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 600 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2.5 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) का मान 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टिल डिस्प्ले ( एलसीडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
सीलिंग उपकरण के तल में और ऊपर के ढक्कन में बायीं ओर दायीं ओर छेद करके की जाती है और इन छेदों के आर- पार एक सील वायर निकाली जाती है । उपकरण के दोनों छोरों पर सीलिंग वायर पर एक चपटी लीड सील लगाई जाती है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का एक विशिष्ट सीमेटिक डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 * अथवा 5 × 10 % , के हैं, जहां पर ' के ' धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 248 ) /2007 ]
आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4089
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 27th March , 2008
S.O. 2038. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of " MIRAS - PH " series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "Sartorious" (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Sartorious Mechatronics India Pvt . Ltd. , 10, 3rd Phase , Peenya Industrial Area , Bangalore -560058 , Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/481;
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 600kg and minimum capacity of 2.5kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 50g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The liquid crystal display ( LCD ) indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply.
The sealing is done by making a hole at the bottom plate and the upper cover of the indicator from the left side and fasten a leaded wire for receiving a verification seal . A typical schematic diagram of the sealing arrangement of the model has been given above .
Further , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' c ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 248 )/2007 ]
R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4090
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , .1930
[ PART II - SEC. 3 (ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 27 मार्च , 2008
का.आ. 2039.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सरटोरियस मेकेट्रानिक्स इंडिया प्रा. लि. , 10 , फेज -3 , पिन्या इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, बंगलौर -560058 , कर्नाटक द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एमआईआरएएस - पीएम " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन संहितं, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सरटोरियस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आईएनडी/09/07/482 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टिल डायोड ( एलसीडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।.
सीलिंग उपकरण के तल में और ऊपर के ढक्कन में बायीं और दायीं ओर छेद करके की जाती है और इन छेदों के आर- पार एक सील वायर निकाली जाती है । उपकरण के दोनों छोरों पर सीलिंग वायर पर एक चपटी लीड सील लगाई जाती है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का एक विशिष्ट सीमेटिक डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10के अथवा 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 248 )/2007]
आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4091 [ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008 / श्रावण 11 , 1930
New Delhi , the 27th March , 2008
S.O. 2039.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of " MIRAS - PM " series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " Sartorious " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Sartorious Mechatronics India Pvt . Ltd. , 10, 3rd Phase, Peenya Industrial Area , Bangalore - 560058 , Karnataka and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/482;
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform, type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg and minimum capacity of 4kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 200g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The liquid crystal display ( LCD) indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230V , 50Hz alternative current power supply .
The sealing is done by making a hole at the bottom plate and the upper cover of the indicator from the left side and fasten a leaded wire for receiving a verification seal . A typical schematic diagram of the sealing arrangement of the model has been given above .
Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k, 2x10 or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 248 )/2007 ]
R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 4092
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 2, 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
नई दिल्ली , 19 मई , 2008
का.आ. 2040.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी एन डब्ल्यू एम एल , मिडलसैक्स , यूनाइटिड किंगडम द्वारा जारी मॉडल अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र के साथ उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एवरी व्हेट्रोनिक्स लि. , फाउंडरी लेन , स्मीथवीक , वेस्ट मिडललैंड बी 66 2एलपी , यूनाइटिड किंगडम द्वारा विनिर्मित " एवरी बर्कल एम " | श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एवरी व्हे-ट्रोनिक्स " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और भारत में बिना किसी परिवर्तन या परिवर्धन के मैसर्स एवरी इंडिया लि. , प्लाट नं. 50-54, सैक्टर -25 , बल्लभगढ़ -121004 हरियाणा द्वारा बिक्रित और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आईएनडी/ 13 /08 / 61 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।
AVERY WEIGH- TRONIX M² SERIES SCALES - TYPICAL
मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम
उक्त मॉडल भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार का ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता । ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल के साथ अधिकतम क्षमता की रेंज 3 कि.ग्रा. से 30 कि.ग्रा. है और मापमान की संख्या बहु अंतराल के लिए एन ≤ 3000 और सिंगल अंतराल के लिए एन ≤ 6000 है । यह मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) से संबंधित है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धरित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है ।
उपकरण की सीलिंग के लिए , मापमान अंतरालों तक पहुंच के लिए प्लेटफार्म के नीचे पेच दिए गए हैं जैसाकि ऊपर द्विखाया गया है मापमानों के सभी प्रकार की सीलिंग के लिए उपयोग किए गए लीड प्लंग में से स्टील तार को निकाल कर उससे लपेटा जाएगा ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 86 )/2007 |
आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4093
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 19th May , 2008
S.O. 2040. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , along with the model approval certificate issued by the NWML, Middlesex , United Kingdom is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (table top type ) with digital indication of series ' Avery Berkel M² " with brand name ' Avery Weigh- Tronix ' and manufacturedby M/s . Avery Weigh - Tronix Ltd. , Foundary Lane, Smethwick , West Midlands B66 2LP , United Kingdom and sold in India without any alteration or additionsby M /s . Avery India Ltd. , Plot No. 50-54 , Sector - 25 , Ballabhgarh- 121004 , Haryana and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 13 /08 /61 ;
Thesaidmodel is a load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity in the range of 3kg to 30 kg with verification scale interval ( e ) 1g or more and the number of scale interval n ≤6000 for single interval and n ≤ 3000 for multi interval . It belongs to medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect .
AVERY WEIGH -TRONIX M² SERIES SCALES - TYPICAL
Fig. 2- Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model
Screws under the platform provided access to the scale intervals . The steel wire is passed through two screws with holes under the platform and crimped to a lead plug , ensuring that scale can not be opened without tampering the lead seal . Atypical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.
[F. No. WM - 21 ( 86)/2007 ]
R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 2745 GI/08-6
1 [PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 4094
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 2 , 2008/SRAVANA 11 , 1930
नई दिल्ली, 13 जून, 2008
का.आ. 2041.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी एन डब्ल्यू एम एल मिडलसैक्स , यूनाइटिड किंगडम द्वारा जारी मॉडल अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र के साथ उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट तथा माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एवरी व्हे - ट्रोनिक्स लि. , फाउंडरी लेन , समेथवीक , वेस्ट मीडलैंड्स बी 66 2 एलपी , यूनाइटिड किंगडम द्वारा विनिर्मित IX श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एवरी व्हे - ट्रोनिक्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और भारत में बिना किसी परिवर्तन या परिवर्धन के मैसर्स एवरी इंडिया लि. , प्लाट नं. 50-54 , सैक्टर -25 , बल्लभगढ़ -121 001 हरियाणा द्वारा बिक्रित और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आईएनडी/ 13/07/438 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।
IX212
माडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम
उक्त माडल भारः सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार का ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता । ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल के साथ अधिकतम क्षमता की रेंज 6 कि.ग्रा. से 15 कि.ग्रा. तक है और मापमान की संख्या बहु अंतराल के लिए n < 3000 और सिंगल अंतराल के लिए एन 6000 है । यह मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) से संबंधित है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धरित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है ।
मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद किया जाएगा । मॉडल की सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन, सर्किट डायग्राम , कार्यकारी सिद्धांत इत्यादि मे परिवर्तन नहीं किया जाएगा ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 97 ) / 2007|
आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4095 [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
New Delhi , the 13th June , 2008
S.O. 2041. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , along with the model approval certificate issued by the NWML , Middlesex , United Kingdom is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( table top type ) with digital indication of series ' IX' with brand name ' Avery Weigh - Tronix ' and manufactured by M/s . Avery Weigh- Tronix Ltd. , Foundary Lane , Smethwick , West Midlands B66 2LP , United Kingdom and sold in India without any alteration or additions by M / s . Avery India Ltd. , Plot No. 50-54, Sector-25 , Ballabhgarh - 121 004 , Haryana and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 13 /07/438;
Thesaid model is a load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with maximum capacity in the range of 6kg to 15 kg in respect of verification scale interval n ≤ 6000 for value of verification scale interval (e) 1g or more and the verification scale interval n ≤ 3000 with a maximum of two partial weighing range . It belongs to medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect .
IX212
Fig. 2-Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model .
The sealing shall be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram , working principle etc.
[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 97 ) /2007 ]
R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4096
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
नई दिल्ली , 13 जून , 2008
का.आ. 2042.--केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सनराइज टैक्नोलोजी , सी/एस/ 29 , महेश्वरी अपार्टमेंट , पुरुषोत्तम नगर , सुभाष ब्रिज , अहमदाबाद द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एस टी- II " श्रृंखला अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के माडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सनराइज " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आईएनडी/09/07/ 517 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।
SUNRISE SUNRISE IFCHNOLOGY
AIMEDABAD (GUJ)
MAX 30 kg Min 100 g 0.5g
माडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम
उक्त माडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
उपकरण के तल और इसके बायीं तथा दायीं ओर के शीर्ष कवर पर किए गए छेद के द्वारा सील किया जाएगा तथा इन छेदों के दोनों तरफ सील करने के तार को डाला जाएगा । उपकरण के दोनों ओर सील करने के तार पर चौकोर सीसा सील का उपयोग किया जाएगा । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का विशिष्ट स्कीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्राम से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10* , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 250 ) /2007 ]
आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4097
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 13th June , 2008
S.O. 2042 , Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic (Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " ST- II " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name "SUNRISE" (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M /s . Sunrise Technology, C/S/29 , Maheshwari Apartment, Purshotam Nagar , Subhash Bridge , Ahmedabad and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 07 /517 ;
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
SUNRISE SUNRISE TECHNOLOGY
ARMEDABAD( GUI)
Fig . 2- Schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model
The sealing is done through the hole made in the bottom and top cover of the instrument at the left and right side and a seal wire is passed through these holes on both sides . A square lead seal is applied to the sealing wire on both sidesof the instrument . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .
Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval ( n) inthe range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g or with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10% or 5 × 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[F. No. WM- 21 ( 250)/2007 ]
R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4098
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
नई दिल्ली, 13 जून, 2008
का.आ. 2043.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट तथा माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) और बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स हरिओम स्केल कं. , जिनजुदा गेट, डॉ. बी. के. पटेल रेजिडेंट के सामने , सावरकुण्डला , अमरेली जिला-364515 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एच एस सी पी एफ 30 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " दसराम " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आईएनडी/ 09/ 07/ 185 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
2min 2kg 1000
उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित तोलन अस्वचालित तोलन ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 किलो ग्राम और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 किलो ग्राम है । इसका सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल 100 ग्रा. है इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लाईट इमिटिंग डायोड तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री के पूर्व या उपरांत इसके सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , वर्किंग सिद्धान्त आदि के रूप में कोई परिवर्तन न किया जा सके ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम से अधिक और 5,000 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 67 ) /2007 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4099
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 13th June , 2008 .
S.O. 2043. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self indicating , non- automatic (Platform type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " HSC - PF - 30 " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " DASARAM (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Hariom Scale Co. , Zinzuda Gate , Opp . Dr. B.K. Patel Resi . , Savarkundala, Dist . Amreli - 364 515, Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /07/185 ;
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 1000kg . and minimum capacity of 2kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its materials , accuracy, design , circuit diagram , working principle etc. before or after sale .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 5,000kg . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of I × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 67 )/2007|
R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4100
[PART 11- SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
नई दिल्ली , 13 जून , 2008
का.आ. 2044.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट तथा माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) और बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स हरिओम स्केल कं. , जिनजुदा गेट, डॉ बी. के. पटेल रेजिडेंट के सामने , सावरकुण्डला , अमरेली जिला -364515 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " एच एस सी पी एफ -41 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचक सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " दसराम " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/184 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
HSC PF 4111 max1000kg min2.5kg e50g
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित तोलन अस्वचालित तोलन ( ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2.5 किलो.ग्रा. है । इसका सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लाईट इमिटिंग डायोड तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टांपिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री के पूर्व या उपरांत इसके सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , वर्किंग सिद्धान्त आदि के रूप में कोई परिवर्तन न किया जा सके ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. के ' ई ' मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्राम या उससे अधिक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम से अधिक और 5,000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 , के हैं , जहाँ पर ' के ' धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 67 ) /2007 ]
आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4101
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 13th June , 2008
S.O. 2044. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of " HSC -PF - 41 " series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - 11) and with brand name "DASARAM " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Hariom . Scale Co. , ZinZuda Gate, Opp. Dr. B.K. Patel Resi . , Savarkundala, Dist . Amreli -364515 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/ 184;
HSC PF 41 mex 1000kg min 2.5kg 50g
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1,000kg . and minimum capacity of 2.5kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 50g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
Inaddition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy , design , circuit diagram , working principle etc. before or after sale.
Further , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instument , of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity range above 50kg . and up to 5,000 kg . and with nun of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k, 2x10 or 5x10k , k being the positive or nagative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle . design , accuracy and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM -21 ( 67)/2007 ]
R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director, Legal Metrology 4102
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली , 13 जून , 2008
का.आ. 2045.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट तथा माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) और बाट तथा माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स हरिओम स्केल क. , जिनजुदा गेट, डॉ बी.के. पटेल रेजिडेंट के सामने , सावरकुण्डला , अमरेली जिला-364515 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " एच एस-टीटी" श्रृंखला के अंकंक सूचक सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " दसराम " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी /09/07/82 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
दासाराम ScaleCo.
HS TT9 II Max 22kg min 100g e 2g
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित तोलन अस्वचालित तोलन ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 22 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । इसका सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लाईट इमिटिंग डायोड तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टांपिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिएं भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री के पूर्व या उपरांत इसके सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , वर्किंग सिद्धांत आदि के रूप में कोई परिवर्तन न किया जा सके ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा . से 50 मि. ग्रा. के ' ई ' मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्राम या उससे अधिक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 , 5 × 10% , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (67 ) /2007 ] आर. माधुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4103 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008 / श्रावण 11 , 1930
New Delhi , the 13th June , 2008
S.O. 2045. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use andto rénder accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with digital indication of " HS - TT - 9 " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " DASARAM" ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M /s . Hariom Scale Co. , Zinzuda Gate , Opp. Dr. B.K. Patel Resi . , Savarkundala, Dist . Amreli - 364 515 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /07/ 182 .
बासाराम
Mfg.Hariom ScaleCo.
HS TT9 II Max 22kg min 100g e 2g
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 22kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( c ) is 2g . It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emiting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram, working principle etc. before or after sale.
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e' value of Img to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10% , 2x10 or 5x10 % , k being the positive or nagative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 67)/ 2007 |
R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director, Legal Metrology 4104
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii )]
नई दिल्ली, 13 जून , 2008
का.आ. 2046.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप भानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स हरिओम स्केल क... जिनजुदा गेट, डॉ बी. के. पटेल रेजिडेंट के सामने , सावरकुण्डला, अमरेली जिला-364515 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एच एस सी-टी टी-21 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचक सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल 'का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " दसराम " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी /09/07/183 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
Mig.Hariom ScaleCo.
min100ge5g PCTT21IIImax30kg
उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित तोलन अस्वचालित तोलन ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । इसका सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल 5 ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लाईट इमिटिंग डायोड तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
स्टांपिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री के पूर्व या उपरांत इसके सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट' डायग्राम , वर्किंग सिद्धान्त आदि के रूप में कोई परिवर्तन न किया जा सके ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे "जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. के ' ई' मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक कं' ई ' मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 ×10 ", 2× 10 % , 5× 10 %, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 67 ) /2007 |
आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4105
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
New Delhi , the 13th June , 2008
S.O. 2046. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic ( Tabletop type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " HSC - TT - 21 " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " DASARAM " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Hariom Scale Co. , Zinzuda Gate , Opp . Dr. B.K. Patel Resi . , Savarkundala , Dist . Amreli -364515 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/ 183 ;
बसाराम
ScaleCo.
Mfg.Hariom
HSCTT21IIImax30kgmin100ge5g
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( c) is 5g . It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emiting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy , design , circuit diagram , working principle etc. before or after sale .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instuments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g or with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of ix 10k , 2x10k or 5x10k , k being a positive or nagative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials withwhich , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[ F. No. WM -21 ( 67 )/2007
R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director , Legal Metrology 4106
[ PART 11 Stc . 3 ( ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
नई दिल्ली , 13 जून , 2008
का.आ. 2047.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट और इस उद्देश्य के लिए जर्मनी में अधिसूचित निकाय ( पी टी बी जर्मनी ) द्वारा अनुमोदित और स्वीकृत परिणामों और पैटर्न मूल्यांकन रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की उपधारा ( 3 ) के परन्तुकं और धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एम एम पैट्रो एसपी.जू. ओ. , ऊल. स्पोलजीजेजो 1,44-240 जोरी , पोलेंड द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग 1.0 वाले " पेटू- प्रिमस 1 /पेट्रो - प्रिमस 2 " श्रृंखला के एल पी जी डिस्पेंसर ( पानी के अलावा अन्य द्रव्यों के लिए मीटर ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एम एम पेट्रो एसपी. जू.ओ. " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) जिसे मैसर्स वारी एम एम पेट्रो टेक प्रा.लि. 36 , दामजी श्यामजी इंडस्टियल काम्पलैक्स , महाकाली केव्ज रोड, अंधेरी ( पू. ) मुबंई -400093 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा भारत में विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/ 13 /07/445 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक एल पी जी डिस्पेंसर है जो पिस्टन भराव और इलैक्ट्रानिक्स के सिद्धांत पर कार्य करता है । जिसे मैकेनिकल वाहन कौ पुनः भरने के लिए प्रोपेन ब्यूटेन लिक्विफाइड गैस और अन्य मिश्रण के वितरण के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । इसमें मापन ट्रांसड्यूसर , पल्स सेंसर , गैस सेपरेटर , इलैक्ट्रानिक इंडिकेटर आदि सम्मिलित हैं । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रकार का प्रदर्श है और मूल्य आयत और बेसिक मूल्य के लिए प्रिसैट सुविधा है । इसकी अधिकतम प्रवाह दर रेंज 60 लिटर/मिनट और न्यूनतम प्रवाह दर 6 लीटर/ मिनट है । न्यूनतम माप 5 लिटर है । परिचालन तापमान की रेंज -25 ° से +55 ° सैं. है और अधिकतम प्रचालन दाब +25 बार है ।
स्टांपिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए भी सीलबंद किया जाएगा और मॉडल को उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , कार्यकारी सिद्धान्त आदि की शर्तों के संबंध में परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । मॉडल सीलिंग व्यवस्था का स्कीमवार डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।
| फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 144 ) /2007|
आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]
4107
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008 / श्रावण 11 , 1930
New Delhi , the 13th June , 2008
S.O. 2047. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, along with the pattern evaluation report and also the test report and the test results granted and approved by the PTB, Germany , a notified body for the purpose in the Germany, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by the third provisoi to sub section (3 ) and sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of Model of LPG Dispensar ( Meter for liquids other than water ) of accuracy class 1.0 and with brand name " MM Petro Sp.zo.o. " and series ' PETRO - PREMUS 1 / PETRO - PREMUS 2 ' ( hereinafter reffered to as the model ) , manufactured by M/s. MM Petro Sp.Zo.o. , ul . Spoldzielcza 1 , 44-240 Zory, Poland and marketed in India by M/ s Waaree MM Petro Tech Pvt . Ltd, 36 , Damji Shamji Industrial Complex, Off Mahakali Caves Road , Andheri ( E) , Mumbai -400093 , Maharastra and which is assigried the approval mark IND/ 13/07/445;
The said model is a LPG dispensar working on the principle of piston filling and electronics and is designed to deliver propane - butane liquefied gas and other mixture for refuel the mechanical vehicle . It consist of measurement transducer , pulse sensor , gas separator , electronic indicator etc. The display is of light emitting diode ( LED ) type and is having preset facility for price , volume and basic price. Its maximum flow rate range 60 liter /minute and minimum flow rate is 6 liter/minute. The least measurement is 5 liter . The operating temperature range is from -25 ° C to + 55 ° C and the maximum opu.ating pressure is + 25bar .
The sealing shall be done to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and mode! shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy , design , circuit diagram , working principle etc. A typical schematic diagram of the scaling arrangement of the model has been given above .
[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 144 )/2007 ]
R. MATHURBOOTIAM , Director of Legal Metrology [PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANΝΑ 11 , 1930
4108
नई दिल्ली, 13 जून , 2008
का.आ. 2048.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) और बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स किनाल स्केल मैनुफेक्चरिंग वर्क्स, 9 - देवस्य बँगला , निकोल नरोदा रोड , मनोहर विला के सामने , निकोल , अहमदाबाद , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " के सी के -40" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचक सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज कानवर्सन किट प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " किनाल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी / 09/ 08/ 107 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज कनवर्सन किट प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 40 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 किलो. ग्रा. है । इसका सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल 10 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शतप्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । तरल क्रिस्टल डिस्पले/वेक्यूम फलोरेसेंट डिस्पले तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्य करता है ।
min
lond cell इण्डिकेटर में किए गए छिद्रों से सीलिंग की जाती है और तत्पश्चात् इन छिद्रों से एक तार पास की जाती है और तार पर लीड सील लगाई जाती है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान के टाइपिंकल स्कीमेटिक डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 % , 2× 10 , 5× 10 號 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 35 ) /2008 ]
आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4109
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 13th June, 2008
S.O. 2048. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge conversion kit type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of scries "KCK -40 " and with brand name " KINAL " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Kinal Scale Manufacturing Works , 9- Devasya Bungalows , Nicol Naroda Road, Opp . Manoher Villa , Nicol , Ahmedabad , Gujrat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /08 / 107 ;
Thesaid model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Weight bridge conversion kit type) with a maximum capacity of40 tonne and minimuin capau'ty of 200kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 10kg . It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emiting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .
Sealing is done through the holes made in the indicator, then a wire is passed through these holes and the lead seal isapplied on the wire. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instuments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5tonne and up to 100 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 %, 2x10 or 5x10 %, where k is a positive or nagative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM- 21 ( 35 ) /2008 ]
R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 2745 G1/08-8 4110
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11. 1930
[PART II - SEC . 3 (ii )|
नई दिल्ली , 13 जून , 2008
का.आ. 2049.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स किनाल स्केल मैनुफेक्चरिंग वर्क्स , 9 - देवस्य बंगला , निकोल नरोदा रोड, मनोहर विला के सामने , निकोल , अहमदाबाद , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " के एफ डब्ल्यू-40 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचक सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " किनाल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी /09/08 / 106 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 40 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. है । इसका सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल 10 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित अधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । तरल क्रिस्टल डिस्पले /वेक्यूम फ्लोरेसेंट डिस्पले तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
इण्डिकेटर में किए गए छिद्रों से सीलिंग की जाती है और तत्पश्चात इन छिद्रों से एक तार पास की जाती है और तार पर लीड सील लगाई जाती है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का टाइपिकल स्कीमेटिक डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5× 10% , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 35 ) /2008 ] "आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4111
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
New Delhi , the 13th June , 2008
S.O. 2049. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Weigh bridge type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " KFW - 40 " and with brand name " KINAL " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/s . Kinal Scale Manufacturing Works, 9 - Devasya Bungalows , Nicol Naroda Road , Opp . Manoher Villa, Nicol , Ahmedabad , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/ 106;
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Weigh bridge type ) with a maximum capacity of 40 tonne and minimum capacity of 200kg . The verification scale interval ( c ) is 10kg . It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emiting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
Fully-Weigh Bridges
Sealing is done through the holes made in the indicator , then a wire is passed through these holes and the lead seal isapplied on the wire . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .
Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instuments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5tonne and up to 100 tonne with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 , 2x10 or 5x10%, k isa positive or nagative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .
[F. No. WM- 21 ( 35 )/2008 ]
R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4112
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[ PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 16 जून , 2008
का.आ. 2050.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स श्री गोपाल इंटरनेशनल , 19/2/1 बाबूताला रोड , दमदम, कोलकाता-700074 पश्चिम बंगाल द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) के " एस जी आई टी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एस जी आई " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी /09/07/232 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
पाट स्केल के ढ़ाचे के अंदर है और पाट के समायोजन द्वारा कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के उपयोग के लिए ढ़ाचे पर कोई छेद नहीं दिया गया है । मॉडल के निचले और ऊपरी भाग में , छेद किए गए हैं और इन छेदों में से तार को निकाला गया है जिसे सील किया गया है । माडल को सील बंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्रारूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है किउक्त माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10% , 5 × 10% , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएन -21 ( 2 ) /2007 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4113
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 16th June , 2008
S.O. 2050. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with digital indication of " SGIT " series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " SGI " (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M /s . Shree Gopal International , 19/2/1 , Babutala Road , Dumdum , Kolkata- 700074 , West Bengal and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/07 / 232 ;
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Tabletop type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 2g. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emiting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .
SGI
SGI
The pot is inside the body of the scale and no hole is provided on the body to frequent fraudulent use by adjusting the pot . In the lower and upper part of the model , holes are being made and a wire is passed through these two holes which is sealed . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .
Further , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) ofsection 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number of verification scale inerval (n ) in the range of 100 to 50000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10 or 5x10k , k being the positive or nagative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 2 )/2007 ]
R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4114
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
नई दिल्ली , 16 जून , 2008
का.आ. 2051.-कंन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीच दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब कंन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स श्री गोपाल इंटरनेशनल , 19/2/1 बाबूताला रोड, दमदम , कोलकाता -700 074 पश्चिम बंगाल द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 11 ) वाले " एस जी' आई पी " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एस जी आई " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी /09/07/ 233 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) तेोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 250 ग्रा. है । इसका सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
पॉट स्कल के दावे के अंदर है और पाट के समायोजन द्वारा कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के उपयोग के लिए ढ़ांचे पर कोई छेद नहीं दिया गया है । मॉडल को निचले और ऊपरी भाग में, छेद किए गए हैं और इन छेदों में से तार को निकाला गया है जिसे सील किया गया है । मॉडल को सील बंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्रारूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित रस का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 , के हैं। जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 2 )/2007 ]
आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4115
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008 / श्रावण 11 , 1930
New Delhi , the 16th June , 2008
S.O. 2051. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Plateform type) with digital indication of " SGIP" series of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " SGI " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M /s . Shree Gopal International , 19/2/1 , Babutala Road , Dumdum, Kolkata- 700074 , West Bengal and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 07/233 ;
The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 100kg and minimum capacity of250g. The verification scale interval (c) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emiting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .
SGI
The pot is inside the body of the scale and no hole is provided on the body to frequent fraudulent use by adjusting the pot . In the lower and upper part of the model , holes are being made and a wire is passed through these two holes which is sealed . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .
Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instuments of similar måke and performance of same series with maximum capacity range above 50kg and upto 5000kg and with number of verification scale inerval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 50000 for ' e ' value of 1mg to 50mg and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of5000 to 50000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x 10% , 2x10 or 5x 10% , k being the positive or nagative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[ F. No. WM - 21 (2 )/20071
R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4116
नई दिल्ली, 16 जून , 2008
का.आ. 2052.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाटं और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स श्री गोपाल इंटरनेशनल , 19/2/1 बाबूताला रोड , दमदम, कोलकाता-700074 पश्चिम बंगाल द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) के " एस जी आई पी " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक , अस्वचालित अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एस जी आई " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी 709/07/234 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।
उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा . है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 10 ग्रा. हैं । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।
पॉट स्केल के ढ़ांचे के अंदर है और पॉट के समायोजन द्वारा कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के उपयोग के लिए ढ़ांचे पर कोई छेद नहीं दिया गया है । मॉडल के निचले और ऊपरी भाग में , छेद किए गए हैं और इन छेदों में से तार को निकाला गया है जिसे सील किया गया है । माडल को सील बंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्रारूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 500 से 10000 की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (2)/2007 ]
आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4117 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
New Delhi , the 16th June, 2008
S.O. 2052. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of self indicating non- automatic (Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " SGIP " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III) and with brand name " SGI " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Shree Gopal International , 19/2/1 , Babutala Road, Dumdum , Kolkata - 700074 , West Bengal and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 07/234;
The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 100kg and minimum capacity of200g . The verification scale interval (e) is 10g. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emiting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.
SGI
The pot is inside the body of the scale and no hole is provided on the body to frequent fraudulent use by adjusting the pot. In thelower and upper part of the Model , holes are being made and a wire is passed through these two holes which issealed . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above .
Further,in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12) of section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instuments of of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10k or 5x10 % , k being the positive or nagative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.
[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 2 )/2007 ]
R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 2745 G1/08-9
1 4118
[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
नई दिल्ली, 26 जून , 2008
का.आ. 2053.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स देवीश्री मुद्रण प्रा. लि. , 900 , एमआईई , बहादुरगढ़ , हरियाणा द्वारा विनिर्मित " डीएसएम- ईटी-3 डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित टैक्सी/आटो किराया मीटर के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " डाल्फिन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उचत मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी /09/07/264 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।
DolphinElectronic Fare Meter
CAUTION
Check
"ZERO"
MODEL
उक्त मॉडल अंकक सूचन सहित टैक्सी किराया मीटर है जो समय और दूरी नापने का उपकरण है । यह यात्रा के किसी भी क्षण यात्री द्वारा संदेय प्रभार को निरंतर जोड़ता रहता है और उपदर्शित करता रहता है । यात्रा के दौरान कतिपय विनिर्दिष्ट चाल से ऊपर और विनिर्दिष्ट चाल के नीचे चली गई दूरी के किराए को देय करने का फंक्शन है । प्रकाश उर्त्सजक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) मीटर की रीडिंग उपदर्शित करता है । " के " घटक 1390 पल्स/कि.मी . है ।
स्टांपिग प्लेट के मुंद्राकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।
[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 114)/2007] गर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4119
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ].
New Delhi, the 26th June , 2008
S.O. 2053. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said nmodel is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of a Taxi /Auto Fare Meter with digital indication of DSM -ET - 3Wries with brand name " DOLPHIN " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Devishree Mudran Pvt . Ltd. , 900 , MIE , Bahadurgarh , Haryana and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/264;
Electronic Fare ipter
Dolphin
CAUTION
Check ZERO
MODEL
The said model is a Taxi /Auto Fare Meter with digital indication incorported with a distance and time measuring device. It totalizes continuously and indicates the fare at any moment of the journey , the charges payable by the passenger . The fare to pay is a function of the distance travelled above a certain specified speed and the time clapsed below a specified speed during the journey . The reading of the meter is indicatedby Light Emitting Diode ( LED) . The ' K ' factor of the instrument is 1390 pulse per kilometer.
In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram , working principle etc. before or after sale .
[F. No. WM-21 ( 114 )/2007|
R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4120
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो
नई दिल्ली, 14 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2054.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , एतद्वारा , अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वह स्थापित हो गया है:
अनुसूची
क्रम संख्या स्थापित भारतीय मानक की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक (1)
(2)
1.
आई एस 15781 : 2008 वस्त्रादि कम्बलों की ज्वलनशीलता ज्ञात करने की पद्धति
अब यह भारतीय मानक बिक्री के लिए उपलब्ध होगा ।
स्थापित तिथि नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों , यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष
(3)
(4) नहीं
जून , 2008 इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुरशाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई, तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतुर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[संदर्भ: टीएक्सडी/जी-25 ] एम. एस. वर्मा , निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( टीएक्सडी )
BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS
New Delhi , the 14th July, 2008
S.O.2054 . In pursuance of clause ( b ) of sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rules 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indians Standard , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been established on the date indicated against each :
SCHEDULE
SI No. No. & Year of the Indian Standard Established (1)
(2)
1.
IS 15781 : 2008 Textiles - Method for Determi- nation of Flammability of Blankets
Henceforth , this standard will be available for sale .
Date when Established
No. & year of Indian Standars , if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard
(3)
(4) Nil
June , 2008
[ Ref : TXD/ G - 25 ] M. S. VERMA , Director & Head (Textiles)
नई दिल्ली , 14 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2055.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप - नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , एतद्वारा , अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वह स्थापित हो गया है:
अनुसूची
क्रम संख्या स्थापित भारतीय मानक की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक (1)
(2)
1 . आई एस 15789 : 2008 मत्स्य जाल छिद्र का साइज ज्ञात करने की परीक्षण पद्धति- जाल की लम्बाई
अब यह भारतीय मानक बिक्री के लिए उपलब्ध होगा ।
स्थापित तिथि नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष
(4) (3) नहीं
जून , 2008 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4121
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई, तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतुर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[संदर्भ: टीएक्सडी/जी-25 ]
एम. एस. वर्मा , निदेशक एवं प्रमुख ( टीएक्सडी )
New Delhi , the 14th July, 2008
S.O. 2055. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rules 7of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards herby notifies that the Indian Standard , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been established on the date indicated against each :
SCHEDULE
SI ,No . No. & Year of the Indian Standard Established
Datewhen Established
No. & year of Indian Standars, if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Nil
June , 2008 IS 15789 : 2008 Fishing Nets-Method of Test for the Determination of Mesh Size- Length of Mesh .
Henceforth , this standard will be available for sale .
[Ref: TXD/G - 25 ]
M.S. VERMA , Director & Head ( Textiles)
नई दिल्ली , 21 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2056.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो प्रमाणन विनियम 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप - विनियम 5 के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे दिए गए हैं वे स्वीकृतकर दिए गए हैं:-
अनुसूची
लाइसेंस सं.
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता
लागूतिथि
उत्पाद
क्रम संख्या
भा. मा. सं./भाग/अनु/वर्ष 1 2
3
4
5
6 1. 7753387
19-06-2008
भा. मा.
सुवाहय अग्नि शामक
2171 : 1999
शुष्क पावडर ( काट्रीज टाईप)
विनटेक्स फायर प्रोटेक्शन प्रा. लि. युनिट संख्या 1 , अशोक इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, एल बि एस मार्ग , निर्मल लाइफ स्टाइल के नजदीक, मुलुंड पश्चिम ,
मुंबई-400 080.
2. 7787509
17-10-2010 मुकेशज्वेलर्स
भा. मा.
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं
1417 : 1999
के आभुषण/शिल्पकारी-
465, उमेद चॉल , न्यू मिल रोड , कुर्ला पश्चिम, मुंबई-400 070.
शुद्धताव मुहरांकन
3. 7757702
04-07-2010 मंगलमणी ज्वेलर्स
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
बॉम्बे अनेक्स, दुकान संख्या 8/13 , के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
सेक्टर -17 , वाशी , नवी मुंबई,
शुद्धताव मुहरांकन
जिला: ठाणे-400 705 .
4122
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4
3
1 2
17-10-2010
4. 7787711
श्रद्धा ज्वेलर्स 18 , कावराना बिल्डिंग , गोखले सोसायटी लेन , परेल, मुंबई -400 070.
विरा गोल्ड
04-07-2010
5. 7758094
255 , शिवशक्ति इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , मित्तल इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट के सामने, अंधेरी कुर्ला रोड , अंधेरी पूर्व, मुंबई-400 059.
04-07-2010
6. 7757904
श्री महाविर ज्वेलर्स बसेन कॅथोलिक कॉ- आपरेटिव बैंक , होलि बेजार , वसई , जिला: ठाणे401. 201 .
02-05-2010
7. 7736387
मेट्रो अॅलोइस प्रा. लि. 202 , गायत्री धाम , एम. जी. रोड, घाट-कोपर पूर्व , मुंबई
10-09-2010
8. 7776302
पी व्ही ज्वेलर्स दुकान संख्या 2 और 3 , आयुषि अपार्टमेंट , जे. बि. नगर , अंधेरी पूर्व, मुंबई-400 059 .
रूपेश ज्वेलर्स
28-05-2010
9. 7745994
नटराज मार्केट , दुकान संख्या 33 ( ए) , साईनाथ रोड, मालाड पश्चिम , मुंबई-400 059.
15-07-2010
10. 7761891
सिल्वर एम्पोरियम 2-8 , महाजन गलीं, दुकान संख्या 8 , जवेरी बाजार , मुंबई-400-002.
05-08-2010
11. 7767297
एसबी एण्ड टि इंटरनेशनल लि. पहला माला, प्लॉट संख्या 96 , रोड नं 16 , सनसिटी होटल के सामने , एम आय डी सी, अंधेरी पूर्व, मुंबई-400 093.
03-10-2010 नेशनल ज्वेलर्स 12. 7783602
रेलवे स्टेशन के सामने , मनोरं रोड, पालघर , जिला : ठाणे-401 404
11-07-2008
13. 7760900
शहापूर टिंबर प्रॉडक्टस प्रा.लि. प्लॉटख्या 6 और 7 , सर्वे संख्या 86 , विलेज पृधे, बाम्बे आग्रा रोड , शहापुर जिला : ठाणे -401 404
जैनमज्वेलर्स
21-10-2010
14. 7789109
दुकान संख्या 7 , तेरेसा ट्रिम को-ऑ. हाउसिंग सोसायटी , जे. बी. नगर , पोलिस चौकी , अंधेरी ( पश्चिम ) , मुंबई-400 059.
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
6
5
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभुषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभुषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1786 1985 कंक्रीट प्रबलन के लिए उच्च सान्द्रन इस्पात सरिए और तार की विशिष्टी
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999.
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
2112 : 2003 चांदी एवं चांदी मिश्र धातुएं आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहररांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
सामान्य उद्देश्यों के
303 : 1989 प्लाईवुड
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/श्रावण 11 , 1930
3
4 1 2
15. 7773801
29-08-2010 लक्ष्मीज्वेलर्स 7 , हिराकुंज बिल्डिंग , सानं गुरूजी मार्ग , ताडदेव-400 034.
16. 7782701
02-10-2010 अभिनंदन ज्वेलर्स सी- सेक्टर , ए लाईन , दुकान संख्या 16 और 17 , चिता कॅम्प ट्रॉम्बे , मुंबई-400 088.
17. 7754793
27-06-2010 मधु ज्वेलर्स प्रा. लि. मुंबई -400 002. 147-149 , भेरूमल हाउस , ऑफ नं. 12 , पहली मंजिल , जवेरी बाजार ,
18. 7770387
15-08-2010 राजेश ज्वेलर्स दुकान संख्या 4 , जयंत निवास , नेहरू रोड, भाजी मार्केट , डोंबिवली पूर्व, जिला ठाणे-421 201 7775397
19.
02-09-2010 माधवी ज्वेलर्स 5 अपोलो शॉपिंग सेंटर, सी. एस. रोड, आगाशी रोड, विरार पश्चिम, जिला ठाणे -401303.
20. 7771490
19-08-2010 अंकितज्वेलर्स 309-24 , स्टेशन रोड , अंबरनाथ पश्चिम , जिला: ठाणे -421 501 .
21. 7786305
14-10-2010 केशवलाल दलपदभाई जवेरी एण्ड कं. 17-18 ; कपूर मेन्शन, 51 एन. एस. पांटकर रोड, हयूजेश रोड , मुंबई -400.007...
22. 7738997
13-05-2010 एन. के. डायमंड 3 , 4 , जलराम इस्टेट , एम. जी. मार्ग , मुलुंड पश्चिम , मुंबई -400 080.
23. 7782802
02-10-2010 सूर्या गोल्ड
दुकान सं. 4 , चेतना बिल्डिंग , बोन- बोन के पास , जे . पी. रोड , सेव्हन बंग्लोस , अंधेरी पश्चिम, मुंबई-400 053.
24. 7745388 27-05-2010 पदमश्री ज्वेलर्स दुकान सं. 1 , उद्देकर टॉवर, कोलसेवाडी शिव सेना ऑफिस के सामने , कोलसेवाडी, कल्याण पूर्व, जिला : ठाणे-421 306.
25. 7762893
19-07-2010 कौशल ज्वेलर्स ताबंट अली , महाड , जिला रायगढ़- 402301 .
26. 7765701
26-07-2010 आयव्हिवाय ज्वेलरी प्रा. लि. क्रास रोड, बी -3 , प्लॉट सं. 6 , दूसरा माला, एस. बी. आई. के सामने , एम. आई. डी. सी. पोलिस स्टेशन के नजदीक , अंधेरी पूर्व , मुंबई-400 093.
4123 5
6
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी , स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण /शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4124
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
6
4
5
2
3
1
27. 7747901
04-06-2010
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
शिवम ज्वेलर्स दुकान सं. 3 , आरीवाला बिल्डिंग , छत्रिवाला कंपाउन्ड , माजगाव , मुंबई-400 010.
16-07-2010
भा. मा.
28. 7762085 .
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
शीतल क्रिएशन प्रा. लि. प्लॉट सं. 63 , स्ट्रीट सं. 13 , एम आय डी सी, अंधेरी पूर्व, मुंबई-400 093.
24-05-2010
29. 7744790 *
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
आभूषण आर्टज्वेलर्स 10 , शंतिनाथ अपार्टमेंट, चाफेकर जिमखाना के सामने , सिंमपोली सिग्नल के नजदीक, एस. व्हि. रोड , बोरीवली पश्चिम मुंबई-400 092.
30. 7735587
29-04-2010
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
बिनिस डिजायनर डायमंड ज्वेलरी 14- ए, पहला माला, पेपर बॉक्स महाकाली केवज रोड , अंधेरी पूर्व , मुंबई-400 093.
22-08-2010
31. 7772593
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
के आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
रनुजाज्वेलर्स 161 , जवेरी बाजार , शेख मेमोन स्ट्रिट , तल मंजिल , मुंबई -400 002.
29-04-2010
32. 7735082
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा के आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
पूर्णिमा ज्वेलर्स दुकान सं. 4 , मोतीवाला , फिश मार्केट के बाजू में, ए. जी. जी. रोड , डोंबिवली पश्चिम, जिला : ठाणे -401 202.
23-10-2010
33. 7790393
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
पालक ज्वेलर्स दुकान. सं. 2 , राजेन्द्र कुंज , तांदुलवाडी रोड, पालघर , सफाले पूर्व, जिला : ठाणे-401 102 .
18-10-2010
34. 7788410
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
सिद्धार्थ ज्वेलर्स बैंक आफ बरोदा के पास , गोखले रोड , नौपाडा, ठाणे पश्चिम , जिला : ठाणे-401 602.
15-08-2010
35. 7770892
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
के आभूषण /शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
1.
महावीर ज्वेलर्स 13-बी-3 , जंयत निवास , नेहरू रोड, भाजी मार्केट , डोंबिवली पूर्व, जिला : ठाणे-421 201 .
भा. मा.
बन्द सिरे वाले बडे ड्रम-
27-09-2008
36. 7781897
1783 : भाग । :
विशिष्टि
1993
टाईम मेजर इं ( प्रा. ) लि. सर्वे सं. 169 और 191 , विलेज दमनी , पोस्ट अम्बेघर, पेन , जिला :रायगड-402 107.
भा. मा.
कंक्रीट प्रबलन के लिए उच्च
02-05-2008
37. 7736488
1786 1985
सान्द्रन इस्पात सरिए और तार की विशिष्टि
श्रीतिक रोलिंग ( प्रा. ) लि. प्लॉट सं. 122-127 , इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , बिचोलिम , गोवा-403 504 .
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4
3
2
1
08-05-2010
38. 7737591
बी बी बाथिया ज्वेलर्स 776, एम जी रोड , पनेवल , जिला : रायगड-410 206.
26-07-2010
39. 7765697
ट्रेजर 102 , मोर्या इस्टेट, इनफीनिटी माल के सामने, अंधेरी ओशिवरा , न्यू लिंक रोड, अंधेरी पश्चिम, मुंबई -400 053.
10-04-2010
40. 7729794
श्रद्धा ज्वेलर्स प्रा. लि. प्लाट सं. 4 , बि एम एस इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , साई नगर , कांदिवली पश्चिम , मुंबई-400 067.
23-10-2010
41. 7790191
गजदार प्राइवेट लिमिटेड शाह हाउस , पहला माला , कुलाबा पोलिस स्टेशन के सामने , कुलाबा, मुंबई-400 001.
23-10-2010
42. 7790292
संस्कार ज्वेलर्स लि. 1407 , पंचरत्ना , ओपेरा हाउस , मुंबई-400 004.
10-09-2010
43. 7776807
संघवी कपूरचंद बाभूतमलजी एण्ड सन्स अजी बिल्डिंग , मुरबाड रोड, कल्याण पश्चिम , जिला : ठाणे -421,301 .
08-07-2010
44. 7759807
रायल इटालियन ज्वेलर्स प्रा. लि. यूनिट नं. जि 1 - जि 4 , भारत इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , टि. जे. रोड , शिवडी पश्चिम , मुंबई-400 015.
15-07-2010
45. 7761790
दिप डायमंड इंडिया लिमिटेड 6/बी, प्लानेट इंडस्ट्रीयल इस्टेट , सुभाष रोड, विले पारले पूर्व , मुंबई -400 057.
22-04-2010
46. 7733280
महालक्ष्मी ज्वेलर्स चार देसाई शॉपिंग , तिसरा कॉर्टर रोड, बोरिवली पूर्व मुंबई-400 066.
04-07-2010
47. 7757601
पि आर वैश्यपायन एण्ड सन्स 60 - मेन रोड , चित्रा मंदिर टॉकिज के पास, नाशिक-422 001 .
27-06-2010
48. 7756191
कमलेश ज्वेलर्स दुकान सं. - 10 , गोदावरी इमारत , मंकुंद पाटिल लेन , जे पी रोड , अंधेरी पश्चिम , मुंबई-400 058.
29-04-2010
49. 7735385
पंकज ज्वेलर्स मोहम्मद अली चौक , स्टेशन रोड, कल्याण , जिला ठाणे -421 301
28-05-2010
50. 7746693
संतोष विनायक भडेकर ज्वेलर्स 28 , हेंद्रे मेन्शन , गोखले रोड , दादर पश्चिम , मुंबई-400028.
2745 GI/08-10
4125
6
5
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मां.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन 4126
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
1 2
4
3
51. 7751181
12-06-2010 पि. वालचंद ज्वेलर्स 7 , सुमन पाटील बिल्डिंग , जंक्शन ऑफ एस . व्ही . और जे . पि. रोड , अंधेरी पश्चिम , मुंबई-400 058.
52. 7789412
23-10-2008 द सुप्रीम इंडस्ट्रिस लिमिटेड डी-101 , 102 , एम आय डी सी एरिया, जलगांव-425 003 53. 7744386
23-05-2010 शा कालूराम जोधावत एण्ड कं 29, दागिना बजार , मुंबादेवी रोड , मुंबई-400 002.
54. 7729895
10-04-2010 वैभव गोल्ड दुकान सं. 9 , गुलाब बाग , एम. जी. रोड , रेलवे स्टेशन के सामने , सांताक्रुज पश्चिम , मुंबई -400054.
55. 7745186
27-05-2010 लागू बंधू मोतिवाला प्रा. लि. सी-102 , कोहीनूर अपार्टमेंट , एन. सी. केलकर मार्ग , दादर पश्चिम , मुंबई -400 028.
56. 7769608
12-08-2010 श्री कल्पतरू ज्वेलस ( इं ) प्रा. लि. 109 , गणपत भवन , पहला माला , 68-72 धानजी स्ट्रिट , मुंबई-400 003.
57. 7733381
22-04-2010 आरती ज्वेलर्स 4. हिमालय अपार्टमेंट , देना बैंक के सामने , सांताक्रुज पूर्व, मुंबई-400 055.
58. 7740479
15-05-2010 मयुरा ज्वेलर्स ४ए , विराज विहार शॉपिंग सेंटर , सेक्टर 400 708 . सं. 16, एरोली , नवी मुंबई , जिला ठाणे
59. 7786103 14-10-2010 सत्यमज्वेलर्स माजगांव (टि. टि. ) -400 010 7बी , चिराग बिल्डिंग , मांउट रोड,
60. 7780794
25-09-2010 डीपी जबेरी 281 , जुम्मा मस्जिद , जवेरी बाजार मुंबई -400 002.
61. 7788511 18-10-2010
172 , पुष्पक अपार्टमेन्ट, सतरहवां माला , 31 , अल्टामाउंट रोड , मुंबई -400 026. राजीव एस मोदी 62. 7768303
06-08-2010 महेश ज्वेलर्स प्लॉट सं. 46 , टि लाइन , दुकान नं. 1 , बैंगनवाडी, शिवाजीनगर , गोवंडी, मुंबई -400 043.
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 5
6
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
पेय जल हेतु उच्च घनत्व
4984 : 1995 पॉलिएथलिन पाइप
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417: 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं शुद्धता व मुहरांकन के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
4 1 2
3
63. 7785606
14-10-2010 ओमकार ज्वेलर्स प्रा. लि. दुकान सं. 8 और 9 , सनरेस शॉपिंग मॉल , चारकोप मार्केट, कांदिवली पश्चिम, मुंबई-400 067.
64. 7731882
17-04-2010 व्हिडि ज्वेलर्स 2, पारस सदन , स्टेशन रोड , विक्रोली पश्चिम, मुंबई-400083 .
65. 7768097
06-08-2008 टाईम मेजर इं प्रा. लि. विलेन दग्नी , पोस्ट आम्बेघर , पेन , जिला : रायगड 66. 7787610
17-10-2010 पल्लवी ज्वेलर्स दुकान सं. 6 , रघुकुलदिप बिल्डिंग , बाजी प्रभु चौक , फाडके रोड , डोंबिवली पश्चिम, जिला : ठाणे -421 201 .
67. 7769507
12-08-2008 विक्ट्री एक्सिम प्रा. लि. 29 , शाह इंडस्ट्रियल प्रिमाइसेस दिओनेर , गोवंडी, मुंबई 68. 7769709
12-08-2010 टि अॅण्ड एफ ओरो मॅन्यूफॅक्चरिंग प्रा. लि. , 9 , जनता कम्पाउंड ए 162 , एस.बी. मार्ग , लोअर परेल , मुंबई -400 013.
15-05-2010
69. 7740378
रिचिज्वेलर्स 70. 7767907
06-08-2010
10144- आय , दागिना बजार , मुंबादेवी रोड, मुंबई -400 002.
मिलन ज्वेलर्स
10-04-2010
71. 7730072
आशा कुंज , दुकान सं. 9 , एन. जी. आचार्य मार्ग , गोवंडी रोड, मधुरा कैंक के सामने , चेंबुर, मुंबई-400 071 .
72. 7777708
11-09-2010 गजरी ज्वेलर्स ए-2 , यशो मंगल शॉपिंग सेंटर अचोले , तुंलिज कॉर्नर , नालासोपारा पूर्व , जिला ठाणे -401 209
27-06-2010
73. 7754591
सुबोध ज्वेलर्स
588 - ए, सुबोध दर्शन , जे. एस. एस. रोड, चिरा बाजार , मुंबई-400 002.
4127 5
6
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
बंद सिरें वाले बडे ड्रम भाग 2 श्रेणी बी ड्रग्स
1783 भाग 2 : 1988
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
संवातन और बर्षा के पानी भा. मा.
13592 : 1992 सहित भवनों के अन्दर की मिट्ट तथा अपशिष्अ निरावेंशन तन्त्र के लिए अनाम्यकृत पी. वी. सी. पाइपें-विशिष्टी
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं
1417 : 1999 शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
बुटिक डी इमरलाड इंडिया लि. , 101-106, निलकांत कमर्शियल सेंटर, के आभूषण /शिल्पकारी- सहार रोड, अंधेरी पूर्व, मुंबई-400 099.
भा. मा.
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन 4128
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 2, 2008/ SRAVANA 11 ; 1930
1 2
3
4 74. 7783194 02-10-2010 राजश्री ज्वेलर्स तक्षिला बिल्डिंग सं. 2 के सामने , महाकाली केव्स रोड, अंधेरी पूर्व , मुंबई-400 093.
75. 7752789
17-06-2010 सिल्वर एम्पोरियम 2-8 , महाजन गली , दुकान सं. 8 , जवेरी बाजार , मुंबई -400 002.
76. 7740681
16-05-2010 सोलार एक्सपोर्ट 149 , शेख मेमोन स्ट्रीट, भेरूमल हाउस , पहला माला, मुंबई -400 002.
77. 7775401
02-09-2010 राजूज्वेलर्स दुकान सं. 4 , शांति निकेतन बिल्डिंग , आगासी रोड ( सी. एस. मार्ग ) , विरार पश्चिम, जिला : ठाणे -401 303 .
78. 7763491
23-07-2010 लिजाज ज्वेलस प्रा. लि. 23-25, प्रकाश भुवन , दूसरा माला , दूसरा अजियारी लेन , नाश्ता , गली के सामने , जवेरी बाजार , मुंबई-400 003 .
79. 7770791
15-08-2010 पर्ल एक्सपोर्ट कंपनी 403 , इंपेरीयल प्लाजा , डॉ. के बी. हेडगेवार मार्ग , बांद्रा पश्चिम, मुंबई-400 050.
80. 7767705
05-08-2010 एम आर शंकलेशा
जगनाथ निवास , दुकान , सं. 2 , विष्णु मंदिर के सामने , घेला देवी चौक , बाजार पेठ, कल्याण पश्चिम, जिला : ठाणे- 421 301.
81. 7727083
01-04-2010 शिरोडकर ज्वेलर्स प्रा. लि. 4, हॉटेल सम्राट बिल्डिंग , दादा वैदय रोड , पनजी , गोवा-403 001 .
82. 7772694
22-08-2010 एच व्हि ज्वेलर्स प्रा. लि.
ड्रिमलॅण्ड बिल्डिंग , तीसरा माला , ब्लॉक सं. एा , ओपेरा हाउस , मुंबई-400 004.
83. 7747594 03-06-2010 परीहार ज्वेलर्स
लक्ष्मी हजारी चॉल , दुकान सं. 4, कोलडोंगरी , सहार रोड, अंधेरी पूर्व, मुंबई-400 069.
84. 7752183
17-06-2010 तिरूपती ज्वेलर्स
तेंडुलकर सदन बिल्डिंग , दुकान सं. 1 , उत्तम रोड, दत्त मंदिर के बाजूमें , भाईंदर पश्चिम, जिला : ठाणे -401 101 .
85. 7762590
19-07-2010 डिझायर ज्वेलस प्रा. लि. 419 पंचरत्ना को-ऑ. हाउसिंग सोसायटी , चौथा माला , ओपेरा हाउस , चर्नी रोड, मुंबई -400 007 .
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii )] 5
6
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं
1417 : 1999 के आभूषणं/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं '
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन 4129
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
6
5
4
3
2
1
भा . मा. 14-10-2010
86. 7785909
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
डायज्वेल 106 , श्रीजी दर्शन , टाटा रोड नं 2 , चेंबर्स के सामने , गिरगम , मुंबई-400 004
भा. मा. 24-04-2010
87. 7734585
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
मिलन गोल्ड म्युनिसिपल हॉस्पीटल के सामने , बाजार पेंठ , बसई विलेज पश्चिम , जिला: ठाणे-401 201 .
भा. मा. 12-04-2010
88. 7730880
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
प्रतिज्ञा ज्वेलर्स 105 , विजप्रभा कॉम्प्लेक्स, पाटकर रोड, कामत मेडिकल के बाजू में , डोंबिवली पूर्व , जिला: ठाणे -421 201 .
भा. मा. 24-04-2010
89. 7734484
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
लोकदिप ज्वेलर्स 5 , ज्वेल आरकेड , 123 , वॉटर फिल्ड रोड , बांद्रा पश्चिम , मुंबई-400 050.
भा. मा. 25-09-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं 90. 7780895
1417 : 1999
के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
जानकी ज्वेलर्स अॅण्ड सी.ए. पेंडुरकर अॅण्ड कं. दुकान सं. 46 , श्याम कमल ए.सी.आर. अगरवाल मार्केट , मोंजिभाई रोड , विले पारले पूर्व, मुंबई-400 057.
भा. मा. 30-04-2008
घरेलू प्रेशर कुकर- विशिष्टी 91. 7735789
2347 : 2006
स्टार अप्लासयन्सेस प्रा. लि. 3 , मिरा कॉ. ऑ. इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , मिरागाव , मिरारोड पूर्व , जिला: ठाणे-400 104.
12-07-2010
92. 7761588
भा. मा. 1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
पुनमज्वेलर्स लाल चक्की चौक , वीर सावरकर मार्ग , स्टेशन रोड, भाजी मार्केट , उल्हासनगर पूर्व, जिला : ठाणे-421 004.
भा. मा. 09-04-2010
93. 7729592
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
नील कमल ज्वेलर्स 1 , बसंत निवास , गुप्ते रोड , डोंबिवली पश्चिम , जिला : ठाणे-421 202.
भा. मा. 05-08-2010
94. 7766905
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
माधवी ज्वेलर्स 17-19 , धानजी स्ट्रीट , दूसरा माला , दुकान सं. 15, मुंबई-400 003 .
भा. मा. 28-08-2010 जेट जेम्स
95. 7773393
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
1 , संतोष बिल्डिंग , 28 रोड , आफ लिंकींग रोड, बांद्रा पश्चिम , मुंबई-400 050.
03-04-2010
भा. मा.
96. 7728287
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
ज्वेलरी पेडणेकर दुकान सं. 1 , म्युनिसिपल मार्केट , मापुसा गोवा, गोवा-403 507.
4130
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[ PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 1
2
3
4
5
6
97. 7742483
17-05-2010
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
कुन्दन ज्वेलर्स केनरा बैंक के सामने , जोशी बाग , स्टेशन रोड , कल्याण पश्चिम , जिला ठाणे 421 301 .
98. 7751484 13-06-2008
भा. मा.
3975 : 1999 सिलवासा वूडन ड्रमस् 501 , एक्सप्रेस चेंबर्स , नटराज स्टूडियो के सामने , अंधेरी- कुर्ला रोड, अंधेरी पूर्व, मुंबई -400 069.
केबिलस के कवच के लिए अल्प कार्बन जस्तीकृत इस्पात तारें आकृति तारें और टेप- विशिष्टि
99. 7787408
17-10-2010
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
पटेल ऑरनामेंट्स 24- बी, श्यामकमल- बी विंग , अगरवाल मार्केट , हॉटेल पारले इंटरनेशनल के सामने , विले पारले पूर्व, मुंबई-400 057.
100. 7759197 08-07-2010
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
विश्वास वैदय गाडगिल सराफ 7 -बी 7 , लक्ष्मी निवास , बाम्बे ग्लास वर्क्स , जे. के. सावंत मार्ग , माटुंगा रोड पश्चिम , माहीम , मुंबई -400 016.
101. 7747796
04-06-2010
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 क्रिएटिव्ह जेम्स अॅण्ड ज्वेलरी प्रा. लि. 229 ,योगी इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , राम मंदीर गोरेगांव पश्चिम , मुंबई-400 014.
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
102. 7759096
08-07-2010
सुवाह्य अग्नि
भा. मा. 13849 :
1993
श्यामक शुष्क पाउडर टाइप
विशिष्टि संचित दाब
विनटेक्स फायर प्रोटेक्शन प्रा. लि. यूनिट सं. 1 , अशोक इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , एल बि एस मार्ग , निर्मल लाइफ स्टाइल के नजदीक, मुलुंड पश्चिम , मुंबई-400 080.
103. 7771086 16-08-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
त्रिवेनि ज्वेलर्स दुकान सं. 2 , जयंत निवास , भाजी मार्केट , नेहरू रोड , डोबिंवली पश्चिम , जिला : ठाणे -421 201 .
104. 7752082
17-06-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
हरेश ज्वेलर्स 30 , धानजी स्ट्रीट , दुकान सं. 16 , अबोव पॉप्यूलर आरकेड, दूसरा माला , मुंबई-400 003.
105. 7790494
24-10-2008
भा. मा. 10124 :
पेय जल आपूर्ति के लिए
भाग । 1998 तुलसी एन -99 , एम आय डी सी एरिया , जलगांव-425 003 .
संविरचित पी वी सी फिटिंग भाग । सामान्य अपेक्षाएं
106. 7738896
13-05-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
पंकज ज्वेलर्स जैन भुवन , दुकान सं. 6 , डॉ. बि ए रोड , परेल फ्लोअर के बाद , परेल , मुंबई-400 012.
107. 7785808
14-10-2010
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण /शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
संघवी अॅण्ड सन्स 191 , कालबादेवी रोड , पहला माला , कॉटन एक्सचेंज पास , कालबादेवी, मुंबई-400 002.
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
2
1
3
4
02-05-2008
108. 7736185
सावित्री स्टिल इंडस्ट्रिस डी-12 , मडकेम , इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , मडकेम , पोंडा, गोवा , दक्षिण गोवा-403404.
109. 7777506
11-09-2010 जयंतिलाल ज्वेलर्स 257- बी, तुलसी भवन, जवेरी बजार, मुंबई-400 002.
04-07-2010
110. 7757803
न्यूमहालक्ष्मी ज्वेलर्स दुकान सं. बी/ 12 , एस,जी बर्वे मार्ग , नेहरू नगर , कुर्ला पूर्व , मुंबई-400 024.
05-06-2010
111. 7749396
सिएनसि डाय ज्वेलस प्रा. लि. ' 167/171 , गंभिर भवन, बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के नजदीक , शेख मेमोन स्ट्रिट, जवंरी बजार , मुंबई -400 002 .
19-07-2010
112. 7762691
दालिचंद चुनिलाल ज्वेलर्स दुकान सं. 3 , बालाजी दर्शन , तिलक रोड , सांताक्रुज पश्चिम , मुंबई-400 054.
14-10-2010
113. 7773797
श्री वर्धमान ज्वेलर्स 8 , पहला माला , लादीवाला चेंबर्स, 11/13 शंख मेमोन स्ट्रिट , कालबादेवी , मुंबई-400 002.
114. 7771389
19-08-2010 साईबा ज्वेलरी अंजली बिल्डिंग , 101- ए, फ्रेंच पूल , ओपेरा हाउस , मुंबई -400 007.
115. 7785707
14-10-2010 वासूज्वेलर्स जिला : रायगड-402 103 . 617 , सोनार अली , गोरेगाव , माणगाव ,
116. 7754692 27-06-2010 श्रद्धा ज्वेलर्स दुकान सं. 6 , नर्सेस क्वार्टर्स ( म्युनिसिपल बिल्डिंग सं. 1 ) , भाजी मार्केट के सामने , अंबरनाथ पश्चिम , जिला : ठाणे -421 501 .
02-09-2010
117. 7775296
ओम प्रकाश ज्वेलर्स श्री पंत समर्थ अपार्टमेन्ट, दुकान सं. 12 , छत्रपति शिवाजी रोड , विठ्ठल मंदीर के सामने , विरार पश्चिम , जिला : ठाणे- 401 303 .
28-05-2010
118. 7746390
संगीता आर्ट ज्वेलर्स काशी विश्वेश्वर मंदीर, दुकान सं. 2 , टी. एच. कटारीया रोड , माटुंगा पश्चिम , मुंबई-400602.
4131 5
6
भा. मा.
1786 1985 कंक्रीट प्रबलन के लिए उच्च सान्द्रन इस्पात सरिए और तार की विशिष्टी
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण /शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन 4132
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008 /SRAVANΝΑ 11 , 1930
3
4 1 2
119. 7778306
16-09-2010 इंटर ज्वेलर्स ( मुंबई ) प्रा. लि. प्लॉट सं. 53-1 , रोड सं. 7 , एम आई डी सी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , आकृती ट्रेंड सेंटर , अंधेरी पूर्व , मुंबई-400 093.
120. 7746491
30-05-2010 जी हस्तिमल अॅण्ड ब्रदर्स ज्वेलर्स बालकृष्णा निवास , दूसरा रोड , खार पश्चिम , मुंबई -400 052.
121. 7737793
08-05-2010 वेगा ज्वेलरी 123 , खुराना कंपाउंड , बिल्डींग सं. 2 , दूसरा माला , आई- बी पटेल रोड , मुंबई-400 063.
122. 7789210
21-10-2010 संघवी केशरीमल सतराजी दुकान सं. 3 , गांधी चौक , बाजार पेठ , कल्याण पश्चिम , जिला : ठाणे- 421 301.
30-09-2008
123. 7782192
अंजली अॅग्रो प्लास्ट एम -11 , एम आय डी सी एरिया , जलगाव-425 003 ...
19-08-2010
124. 7771591
अलंकार ज्वेलर्स 211-213 ,कलबादेवी रोड, तिसरा माला , मुंबादेवी, मुंबई -400 002.
125. 7738795
10-05-2010 भारतीज्वेलर्स एस. एम. रोड, अन्टोपहिल , वडाला पूर्व , मुंबई-400 037.
126. 7785404
14-10-2010 महाविर ज्वेलर्स दुकान सं. 3-106 , एस बि एस रोड , फायर बिग्रेड के नजदिक, कुलाबा, मुंबई-400 005.
16-08-2010
127. 7771187
जि इंडस्ट्रिस
गाला -12 , नोबल इडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट सं. 1 , नवघर , वसई पूर्व, जिला : ठाणे- 401 210 .
128. 7731781
17-04-2010 भैरव ज्वेलर्स 10 अनेक्स अपार्टमेंट , कलिना विलेज बस स्टॅप के नजदीक , कुर्ला करीना रोड , सांताक्रुज पूर्व , मुंबई -400 029.
25-07-2010
129. 7765394
मेहता सेसमल जुहारमलजी एण्ड कं. 43 , दागिना बजार, मुंबादेवी रोड, मुंबई-400 002.
दिनेश ज्वेलर्स
24-04-2010
130. 7735486
56 , च्सूम विलेज , डॉ. ओबेडकर रोड , दांडपाडा, खार पश्चिम , मुंबई -400 052
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]
6
5
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
7834 :भाग 1 : 1 1987
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
4246: 2002 एल पी जी के साथ प्रयोग हेतु घरेलू गैस स्टोव
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
2
1
4
3
22-08-2010
131. 7772492
स्टार ज्वेलर्स 109 , वैशाली इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , बालकृष्ण तावडे रोड , म्हात्रे वाडी, दहिसर पश्चिम , मुंबई-400068.
132. 7733179
22-04-2010 पालशेटकर ज्वेलर्स प्रायवेअ लि. मुकुंद मेंशन , एन. सी. केलकर रोड, दादर मुंबई -400 028.
133. 7745085
27-05-2010 एस. एम. म्हाप्रलकर ज्वेलर्स 220-228 , जे. एस. एस. रोड, गिरगांव , मुंबई-400 004.
11-04-2010
134. 7730173
पन्नालाल सी जवेरी 2 , एम्पायर हाउस , एस. व्हि. रोड इर्ला , विले पारले पश्चिम , मुंबई -400 056.
135. 7735890
30-04-2010 शा शेलाजी आसजी एण्ड कं. 47 , साफीया मंजिल , दुकान सं. 3 , डॉ. मेशेरी रोड, डोंगरी , मुंबई -400 009.
136. 7759908
09-07-2010 राजेंद्र ज्वेलर्स बाबुभाई तन्ना बिल्डींग , मोहम्मद अली जिला ठाणे -421 301 . चौक, स्टेशन रोड , कल्याण पश्चिम ,
137. 7739191
14-05-2010 विक्रमज्वेलर्स विक्रम भवन, रानडे रोड , दादर पश्चिम , मुंबई -400.028 .
138. 7731680
17-04-2010 अनिलज्वेलर्स 9ए, धुरूवाडी, रानडे रोड , वामन हरी पेठे के सामने , दादर, मुंबई -400 028.
139. 7773696
29-08-2010 जवेरीस 3 , गोविंदा बिल्डींग , एम. जी. रोड , ऑफ 18 जून रोड , पनजी गोवा-403 001.
140. 7731983
17-04-2010 राजूज्वेलर्स दुकान सं. 4 , बोडके बिल्डींग , एस. व्हि. रोड, मुंलूड पश्चिम , मुंबई -400 080.
141. 7736791
02-05-2010 गोवा इस्पात लि. इ-6 , मडकैम इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , उत्तर गोवा , पोंडा, गोवा-403 404.
142. 7737692
08-05-2010 राज श्री ज्वेलर्स 5 , रघुकूलदीप बिल्डींग , बाजी प्रभु , फाडके रोड , डोंबिवली पूर्वा,
जिला : ठाणे -421 201 .
143. 7788006
17-10-2010 जवेरी कपूचंद दालिचंद दुकान सं. 11 , दागिना बजार , मुंबादेवी रोड, मुंबई -400 002.
2745 G1/08-11
4133
6
5 .
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा . मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण /शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
सामान्य संरचना इस्पात में भा. मा.
2830 : 1992 पुनर्वेल्लन के लिए कार्बन ढलवां इस्पात , बिलेट इंगट बिलेट, ब्लूम और स्लैब की विशिष्टी
भा . मा.
1417 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन 4134
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
2
4
3
1
144. 7788612
18-10-2010 शाह ट्रेडर्स , बिएनएम ज्वेलर्स , 807 , पंचरत्ना , ओपेरा हाउस , मुंबई-400 004.
17-10-2010
145. 778817
महावीर ज्वेलर्स, गोखले रोड , नौपाडा, कैनरा बैंक के नजदीक, ठाणे पश्चिम-400 602.
146. 7754187
24-06-2008 सुविकास अॅलॉइस अॅण्ड स्टिल प्रा. लि. गट सं. 65/2 , गतेश विलेज ( बुडरूक ) , शीरेष पाडा, कांदिवाली रोड , वाडा, जिला : ठाणे-400 602 .
147. 7784604 04-10-2010 सुदर्शन ज्वेलर्स, 7 , मारवाडी बिल्डिंग , देरसाइ लेन के सामने , एम जी रोड, घाटकोपर पूर्व, मुंबई -400 086.
148. 7768606 07-08-2008 डिंपल ड्रग्स अॅण्ड बॅरेल्स प्रा. लि. गलसूंदे विलेज , रसायनी , जिला : रायगड-410 207.
08-05-2010
149. 7737490
विनायक ज्वेलर्स , दुकान सं. 6 , 7 , 8 , गुलाब बाग , साई लक्ष्मी बाजार , एम. जी. रोड , सांताक्रुज पश्चिम, मुंबई -400 054.
150. 7732682
19-04-2010 भाग्यश्री ज्वेलर्स, 81 , धानजी स्ट्रिट , चंद्र दर्शन , पहला माला, मुंबई-400 003.
02-10-2010
151. 7783295
सिल्वरलाईन ज्वेलर्स प्रा. लि. , 5 , जोहार प्लेस , पहला माला , 299 , कालबादेवी रोड , मुंबई-400 002.
152. 7734888
26-04-2010 रिद्धी सिद्धी ज्वेलर्स , । और 3 , जहागिर बिल्डिंग , जहांगीर मेरवाजी स्ट्रीट, ऑफ डॉ. आंबेडकर रोड, परेल टि टि , मुंबई-400 012.
153. 7751585
03-06-2010 रंत्नकला ज्वेलर्स , 2, मुकुंद निवास , मानपाडा रोड, डोंबिवली पूर्व, जिला : ठाणे-421 201 .
154. 7746592
30-05-2010 जी. एम. गोल्ड, दुकान सं. 76 , सिटी सेंटर , एस. व्हि. रोड, गोरेगांव पश्चिम , मुंबई-400 062.
155. 7752688
17-06-2010 शाह रूपाजी जेठाजी एण्ड सन्स , 129 , भंडारी स्ट्रिट , तल माला , गोल दंवल के नजदीक, मुंबई -400 004.
[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
6
5
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
1786 : 1985 कंक्रीट प्रबलन के लिए उच्च. सान्द्रन इस्पात सरिए और तार की विशिष्टि
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा.
बिटुमेन ड्रग्स
3575 : 1993
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4135
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण ।। , 1930
1 2
3
4
5
6 156. 7744588
23-05-2010
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
पि. जे . शेकलेशा ज्वेलर्स , एनएक्स 7-8 , देवीदयाल टॉवर , कालसेवाडी के सामने , पोलिस स्टेशन , कल्याण पूर्व, जिला : ठाणे-400 062.
157. 7730779
12-04-2010
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
पन्नालाल सी जवेरी , बी-36 , श्यामलाल बिल्डिंग , अगरवाल मार्केट, विले पारले पूर्व , मुंबई-400 057.
158. 7770690
15-08-2010
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
पोरशे ज्वेलर्स , अटरी मिलेनियम मॉल , 310 ए , तिसरा माला , डॉ. अॅनि बसंत रोड, वरली , मुंबई-400 018.
159. 7770589
15-08-2010
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
विपुलज्वेलर्स, दुकान सं. ।/युनिक अपार्टमेंट पि पि मार्ग , बस डिपो के सामने , विरार पश्चिम , जिला : ठाणे-401 303 .
160. 7777405
11-09-2010
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
माधुरीज्वेलर्स, साईनाथ अपार्टमेंट , दुकान सं. 7 , सिद्धार्थ हॉस्पिटल के सामने, विरार पश्चिम , जिला ठाणे -401 303 .
02-09-2010
161. 7775094
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भारती ज्वेलर्स, ओम लक्ष्मी शॉपिंग सेंटर , दुकान सं. 2 , तनकी रोड , तुलिंज , नालासोपारा पूर्व, जिला: ठाणे -401 209.
162. 7781796
27-09-2010
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
अनमोल ज्वेलर्स, पंचरत्ना, दुकान सं. 1 , बोलिंज नोका , एम एम हॉटेल के पास , विरार पूर्व, जिला : ठाणे
163. 7766194
30-07-2010
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण शिल्प, 44,46 , धानजी स्ट्रीट, पहला माला , द ज्वेल कॉ- ऑप . हाउसिंग सोसायटी, जवेरी बजार , मुंबई-400 003.
164. 7728388
03-04-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
राजूज्वेलर्स , दुकान सं. 3 , सूरेश पाटील चॉल , एम. पी. लेन, जे. पी. रोड , अंधेरी पश्चिम, मुंबई-400 015.
165. 7760081
09-07-2010
अग्नि श्यामकों के यंत्रों में भा. मा.
प्रयोग के लिए गैस
4947 : 2006
कारतूस
विनंटेक्स फायर प्रोटक्शन प्रा. लि. , यूनिट सं. । , अशोक इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , एल बी एस मार्ग , निर्मल लाइफ स्टाइल के नजदीक , मुलुंड पश्चिम, मुंबई -400 080.
4136
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4
3
05-06-2010
166. 7748293
फाइव्ह स्टार डायमंडस् 4- जी , नवरत्न बेनहम हॉल लेन , 8 -डॉ डीडी साठे मार्ग , मुंबई -400 004.
15-10-2010
167. 7786911
एम शांतिलाल एण्ड कं. ज्वेलर्स , कमल निवास , एनसी केलकर रोड , दादर पश्चिम , मुंबई-400 028.
17-10-2010
168. 7788309
जि व्हि सिंधि एण्ड कं. , 550/52 , जे. एस. एस. रोड , चिरा बजार , मुंबई -400 002 .
23-10-2010
169. 7790595
प्रकाश ज्वेलर्स विमान दर्शन , दुकान सं. 12 , बैल बजार , ओल्ड कुर्ला, मुंबई -400 070.
07-05-2008
170. 7737187
मंदोवी मेटल प्रा. लि. 200 - ए , कुंदेम इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , कुदेम पोंडा, गोवा , उत्तर गोवा
14-10-2010
171. 7785505
सुधाकर बी शिरवाडकर ज्वेलर्स विश्वदीप बिल्डिंग , बाजीप्रभू चौक , डोंबिवली पूर्व, जिला ठाणे-421 201.
29-08-2010
172. 7773494
मिलन ज्वेलर्स 5, मनिष अपार्टमेंट , मथुरादास रोड, कांदिवली पश्चिम , मुंबई-400 067.
जि बॅगल्स
17-10-2010
173. 7788208
148 , एल. के. मार्केट, जवेरी बजार , मुंबई-400 002.
11-07-2008
174. 7761285
राथि रे- रोलर्स ( इं ) लिमिटेड , 151/1/4 कुपवाडा विलेज- सिली, सिल्वासा कट ऑफ दादरा एण्ड नगर हवेली , सिल्वासा, दादरा एण्ड नगर हवेली.
रॉयल चैन्स
04-06-2010
175. 7747695
यूनिट सं. 203-205 , भारती इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , टी. जे. रोड , शिवडी पश्चिम , मुंबई-400 015.
07-08-2010
176. 7768808
न्यूविवेक ज्वेलर्स,
दुकान सं. 7 , पद्मशाली कॉ-ऑप. हाउसिंग सोसायटी लि. , 60 फुट रोड , माटुंगा लेबर कॅम्प, माटुंगा, मुंबई- 400 067.
02-08-2010 संगीता ज्वेलर्स, 177. 7773292
9 , गुलाब महल बिल्डिंग , साने गुरूजी मार्ग , ताडदेव , मुंबई -400 003.
PART 11--SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
6
5
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. शुद्धता व मुहरांकन के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
सामान्य संरचना इस्पात में भा. मा.
2830 : 1992 पुनर्वेल्लन के लिए कार्बन
ढलवा इस्पात, बिलेट , इंगट बिलेट, ब्लूम और स्लैब की विशिष्टि
1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूष्ण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
कंक्रीट प्रबलन के लिए उच्च भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 सान्द्रन इस्पात सरिए और तार की विशिष्टी
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण /शिल्पकारी .
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4137
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
1 2
3
4
5
6 178. 7783396
02-10-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
ट्रान्सज्वेलरी प्रा. लि. कृष्णा निवास , चौथा माला , राजाराम मोहनरॉय रोड , चर्नि रोड पूर्व , मुंबई-400 004.
15-05-2010
179. 7740580
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
नाइस डायिमंडस् ( इं) प्रा. लि. कांचवाला बिल्डिंग , पहला माला, 63 , धानजी स्ट्रिट , मुंबई-400 003.
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
180. 7756292
28-06-2010
भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भारत सन्सज्वेलर्स 5 , पंचशील , 213 वॉटर फिल्ड रोड, ऑफ लिंकींग रोड , बांद्रा पश्चिम, मुंबई-400 050 .
181. 7753488
19-06-2010
भा. मा.
सुवाहय अग्नि शामक जल
940: 2003
किस्म(गैस काट्रीज)
विनटेक्स फायर प्रोडक्शन प्रा . लि. , युनिट सं. 1 , अशोक इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , एल बि एस मार्ग , निर्मल लाइफ स्टाइल के नजदीक , मुलुंड पश्चिम , मुंबई-400 080.
23-07-2010
182. 7763289
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
सुरभीज्वेलर्स दुकान सं. 9 , एम यू कॉर्नर, तिलक रोड , सांताक्रुज पश्चिम , मुंबई -400 054
के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
183. 7765495 26-07-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
ब्रजलाल अॅण्ड कं. सी-3 बी , हेरमेस हाउस , 33-35 , एम पी मार्ग , ओपेरा हाउस , मुंबई -400 004 शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
184. 7788814
18-10-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शा वालचंद लालचंद राका अॅण्ड सन्स 79 , बाजार पेठ , बाजारपेठ पोलिस चौक के सामने, भिवंडी, ठाणे -421 302. शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
185. 7789311
21-10-2008
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
श्री नाकोडा ज्वेलर्स दुकान सं. 2 , मनजेस भवन , हनुमान मंदिर के सामने , माणिकपुर नाका, वसई पश्चिम जिला: ठाणे -421 301
186. 7734989
29-04-2010 राजूज्वेलर्स
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
एवरेस्ट बिल्डींग , दुकान सं. 10 शितल , एम. जी. रोड, विष्णू नगर , डोंबिवली पश्चिम, जिला : ठाणे-421 202 .
187. 7778003
13-09-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999
के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-.
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
दुकान सं. 1 , जलराम नगरं नं. 3 , वल्ल्भ बाग लेन , घाटकोपर पूर्व, मनसुखलाल एच भिमानी मुंबई-400 077.
188. 7742988
20-05-2008
विद्युत संस्थापनों के लिए भा. मा.
14930 भाग 2 :
कन्डयूट प्रणाली भाग-2
विशेष अपेक्षाएं भूमि के नीचे 2001
ड्युरालाइन इंडिया प्रा. लि. प्लॉट सं. 19-22, 37-40 , फेस- III ए, सानकोले इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , जुआरी नगर गोवा-403 726.
गई कन्डयूट प्रणाली 4138
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4
3
2
1
23-10-2008
189. 7789513
दि सुप्रीम इंडस्ट्रिंस लिमिटेड डी-101 , 102 , एम आय डी सी एरिया , जलगाव-425 003 .
17-10-2010
190. 7787812
शभम ज्वेलर्स दुकान सं. 3 , पटेल चेंबर , एन. जि. आचार्य मार्ग , चेंबूर , मुंबई -400 071 .
21-05-2010
191. 7743283
मुनाट ओरनामेन्ट दुकान सं. 34-35 , एल के मार्केट , पहला लेन, जवेरी बजार , मुंबई -400 002.
24-05-2010
192. 7744891
कावेरी ज्वेलर्स प्लॉट सं. 24-टि-1 , दुकान सं. 1 और 2 , शिवाजी नगर , गोंवडी , मुंबई -400 043 .
22-08-2010
193. 7772391
अरिहन्त ज्वेलर्स दुकान सं. 7 , पटेल बिल्डींग ,एम. जी. रोड, मुलूंड पश्चिम, मुंबई-400 080.
महारत्नराज ज्वेलर्स 194. 7731579
17-04-2008
मोहम्मद अली चौक , स्टेशन रोड, कल्याण पश्चिम , जिलाः ठाणे -421 301.
महेंद्रा ज्वेलर्स
29-05-2008
195. 7735284
2, परदेशी बिल्डिंग , लक्ष्मी मार्केट के नजदीक , स्टेशन रोड , कल्याण पश्चिम , जिला : ठाणे-421 301 .
परफेक्ट प्लास्टिकस 196. 7771288
19-08-2008
गाला सं. 4 , विघ्नहर्ता कंपाउंड , पांचवा मैल, ताबोर आश्रम के पास , कल्याण मुरबाड रोड , पोस्ट कांबा जिला : ठाणे-421 301 .
197. 7753589
विनटेक्स फायर प्रोटेक्सन प्रा. लि.
19-06-2008
युनिट सं. 1 , अशोक इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , एल बि एस मार्ग , मुलुंड पश्चिम , मुंबई -400 080.
05-08-2010
198. 7767604
आदय- शक्तिज्वेलर्स प्रा. लि. 36 , सुर्यमुनि सेंटर , तीसरा माला, 65-67 , सुतार चॉल , जवेरी बजार, मुंबई-400 002.
07-08-2010
199. 7768404
व्टिलाइट जेम्स में कं. प्रा. लि. , स्टिल इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , युनिट सं. 13 , बिल्डींग सं. 2 , मरोल मरोशी रोड , अंधेरी पूर्व मुंबई -400 093 .
18-06-2010
200. 7753286
किशोरचंद्र केशवलाल भावसर
94, कसारा चॉल , दूसरा माला , रूम सं. 44, कलबादेवी रोड, कॉटन एक्सचेंज , मुंबई-400 002.
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
6
5
मलक जल व्यवस्था के लिए भा. मा.
घनत्व वाले पॉलथिएलीन पाइप 14333 : 1996 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
विद्युत संस्थापनों के लिए भा. मा.
नलिकांए भाग 3 विद्युतरोधी 9537 : भाग 3 :
सामग्री के दृढ सादी नलिकाऐं 1983
सुवाहय अग्नि शामक यांत्रिक भा. मा.
10204 : 2001 फोम टाइप
कंक्रीट प्रबंलन के लिए उच्च भा. मा.
सान्द्रन इस्पात सरिए और तार 1786 : 1985 की विशिष्टी
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा.
1417 : 1999 के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-
शुद्धता व मुहरांकन [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4139
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
2
1
3
4
5
6 201. 7768707
07-08-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन 1417 : 1999
बाबुभाई ज्वेलर्स दुकान सं. 3 , अमरप्रेम बिल्डींग , खारेगाव , बि. पि. रोड, भाईंदर पूर्व, जिला : ठाणे -401 105.
202. 7786002
14-10-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन 1417 : 1999
मधुरज्वेलर्स साईनाथ अपार्टमेंट , दुकान सं. 8 , देशमुख हॉस्पिटल के सामने , छत्रपति शिवाजी मार्ग , विरार पश्चिम , जिला : ठाणे -401 303.
203. 7734282
23-04-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन 1417 : 1999
उत्सव सी झेड गोल्ड ज्वेल्स 70 , अपोलो इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , ऑफ महाकाली केव्स रोड , अंधेरी पूर्व , मुंबई-400 093 .
204. 7784705
09-10-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन 1417 : 1999
राजेंद्र ज्वेलर्स 6 , नटराज मार्केट , स्तुरबा थिएटर के सामने, मुलूंड पश्चिम , मुंबई- 400 064.
205. 7770286
15-08-2010
सुवाहय अग्नि शामक यांत्रिक भा. मा. फोम टाइप 10204 : 2001
रोनकज्वेलर्स जयंत निवास , नेहरू रोड, भाजी मार्केट , डोंबिवली पूर्व , जिला ठाणे : 421 201 .
206. 7781901
27-09-2008
पेय जल की पूर्ति के लिए भा. मा. असूघटियत पी. वी. सी. पाइप 4985 : 2000 विशिष्टी
विक्ट्री एक्सिम प्रा. लि. प्लॉट सं. 7 , सर्वे सं. 4ए/4 बी , विलेज होनाड , खोपोली अडोशी रोड , सजगाव , गणेश ग्रिंडींग मिल के सामने , खोपोली , जिला रायगड
207. 7783804
04-10-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- 1417 : 1999 शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
व्हि कपूर ज्वेल्स प्रा. लि. 225 , यूनिक इंडस्ट्सि , बॉम्बे दागिना कंपाउंड, प्रभादेवी , मुंबई- 400 025
208. 7767503
05-08-2010
1417 : 1999
कुबेर गोल्ड 6, महावीर शंपिंग सेंटर , आग्रा रोड, कल्याण पश्चिम , जिला : ठाणे
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
209. 7775603
04-09-2010 शाह फूलचंद ज्वेलर्स दुकान सं. 9 , नांरायण वाडी , स्टेशन रोड , कल्याण पश्चिम , जिला : ठाणे
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- 1417 : 1999 शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
210. 7786204
14-10-2010
1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं भा. मा. के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
अंबिका ज्वेलर्स महाजन गली , दुकान सं. 1 , मुंबादेवी मंदीर के नजदीक , जवेरी बजार , मुंबई-400 002.
[ सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 117
पी. के. गम्भीर , उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर ) [PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 4140
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
New Delhi , the 21st July, 2008
S.O. 2056. In pursuance of sub - regulation (5 ) of regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulations , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given below in the following schedule : Period 1-4-07 to 31-10-07
SCHEDULE
Product
Validity Date
Licence No.
Sl No.
Name and Address (factory) of the Party
IS No./Part/Sec Year
(6)
(5)
(4)
(3)
(1) (2)
IS 2171 :
19-6-2008
1. 7753387
1999
Specification for portable fireextinguishers , dry powder(cartridge type)
Vintex fire Protection Pvt . Ltd. Unit No. 1 , Ashok Indl . Estate , L.B.S.Marg , Near Nirmal Life Style, Greater Bombay Mulund (W) Maharashtra -400080
IS 1417:
17-10-2010
2. 7787509
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking -Specification
Mukesh Jewellers , 465 , Umed Chawl , NewMill Road, Greater Bombay Kurla West Maharashtra -400070
IS 1417:
4-7-2010
3. 7757702
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness andMarking -Specification
Mangalmani Jewellers Bombay Annexe , Shop No. 8/13 , Sector - 17 , Vashi Thane Navi Mumbai Maharashtra -400705
IS 1417:
17-10-2010
4. 7787711
1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness andMarking -Specification
Shraddha Jewellers , 18 Kavarana Building , Gokhale Society Lane Greater Bombay Parel Maharashtra -400012
IS 1417 :
4-7-2010
5. 7758094
1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking -Specification
Veera Gold , 255 Shivshakti Indl . Estate, Opp. Mittal Indl . Estate , Andheri - Kurla Road, Greater Bombay , Andheri East Maharashtra -400059
IS 1417 :
4-7-2010
6. 7757904
1999
Gold andGold Alloy's , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness andMarking -Specification
Shree Mahavir Jewellers Near Bassien Catholic Co-Operative Bank , Holi Bazar , Thane , Vasai , Maharashtra - 401201
IS 1786:
2-5-2008
7. 7736387
1985
Specification for high strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement
Metro Alloys Pvt . Ltd. , 202, Gayatri Dham , M.G. Road, Greater Bombay, Ghatkopar (E)Maharashtra
IS 1417:
10-9-2010
8. 7776302
1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness andMarking - Specification
P.V. Jewellers , Shop No.2 & 3 Aayushi Apartment , JB Nagar Greater Bombay, Andheri East Maharashtra -400059
IS 1417:
28-5-2010
9. 7745994
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking - Specification
Rupesh Jewellers , Natraj Market , Shop No.33 (A)0 , Sainath Road , Greater Bombay Malad West , Maharashtra -400064
IS2112 :
15-7-2010
10. 7761891
2003
SilverEmporium 2/8 Mahajan Gali , Shop No.8 Greater Bombay, Zaveri Bazar, Maharashtra- 400002
Silver& Silver Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification *[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
5-8-2010
11. 7767297
SB & T International . Ltd. IstFloor , Plot No.96 , Road No.16 , Opp . Suncity Hotel , MIDE Greater Bombay, Andheri EastMaharashtra -400093
12. 7783602 3-10-2010
National Jewellers Opp . Railway Station , Manor Road , Thane Palghar Maharashtra -401404 13. 7760990 11-7-2008
Shahpur Timber , Products Pvt. Ltd. Plot No.6 &7 , Survey No.86 , Village Pundhe , Bombay, Agra Road Thane, Shahapur Maharashtra-400601 14. 7789109 21-10-2010
Jainam Jewellers Shop No.7, Teresa Triumph Co- op . HSG . Society Ltd. , JB Nagar , PoliceChowky Greater Bombay , Andheri East Maharashtra- 400059 15. 7773801 29-8-2010
Laxmi Jewellers, 7 , Hirakunj Building, Sane Guruji Marg Greater Bombay, Tardeo Maharashtra -400034 16. 7782701 2-10-2010
Abhinandan Jewellers , C-Sector , A Line , Shop No. 16 & 17 , Cheetha Camp Trombay Greater Bombay, Mumbai Maharashtra -400088
17. 7754793 27-6-2010
Madhu Jewellers , Pvt.Ltd . 147/149 , Bherumal House , Off, No. 12 , Ist Floor Greater Bombay, Zaveri Bazar , Maharashtra -400002
15-8-2010
18. 7770387
Rajesh Jewellers , Shop No.4, Jayant Niwas , Nehru Road , Bhaji Market Thane Dombivli East Maharashtra - 421201 19. 7775397 2-9-2010
Madhavi Jewellers , 5 Apollo Shoping Centre , C.S.Road , Agashi Road , Thane Virar West Maharashtra-401303 20. 7771490 19-8-2010
AnkitJewellers 309/24, Station Road, Thane Ambarnath West Maharashtra - 421501-
14-10-2010
21. 7786305
Keshvalal Dalpatbhai Zaveri & Co. 17/18 , Kapur Mansion 51 , N . S.Patkar Road , Hughes Road Greater Bombay Maharashtra - 400007 2745 G1/ 08-12
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008 / श्रावण 11 , 1930
4141 (5)
(6)
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking -Specification
IS 1417:
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS303 : 1989
Specification for plywood for general purpose
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and GoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking-. Specification
IS1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4142
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
13-5-2010
22. 7738997
N.K.Diamond 3,4 , Jalaram Estate , MG Road , Greater Bombay Mulund West Maharashtra -400080 2-10-2010
23. 7782802
Surya Gold, Shop No.4, ChetanaBuilding, Near Bon- Bon , J.P.Road, Seven Bunglows GreaterBombay Andheri West Maharashtra -400053 27-5-2010
24. 7745388
Padamshree Jewellers Shop No. 1 , Utteker Tower , Opp . Kolsewadi , Shiv Sena Office Kolsewadi Thane , Kalyan East Maharashtra- 421306 25. 7762893 19-7-2010
Kaushal Jewellers Tambat Ali Raigarh Mahad Maharashtra
26-7-2010
26. 7765701
IVY Jewellery Pvt.Ltd Cross Road, B - 3 , Plot No.6 , 2nd Floor , Opp . SBI , Near MIDC Police Station Greater Bombay Andheri East , Maharashtra- 400093
4-6-2010
27. 7747901
Shivam jewellers Shop No.3 , Ariwala Bulding, Chatriwala CompoundGreater Bombay Mazgaon Maharashtra - 400010 16-7-2010
28, 7762085
Sheetal Creations Pvt . Ltd. PlotNo. 63 , Street No. 13 , MIDC Greater Bombay Andheri East Maharashtra - 400093 24-5-2010
29. 7744790
Aabhushan Art Jewellers 10, Shantinath Appt . Opp Chafekar Gymnasium , Near Shimpoli Signal , S. V. Road , Greater Bombay Borivli West Maharashtra -400092 29-4-2010
30. 7735587
Binny's Designer , Diamond Jewellery 14 - A, Ist Floor, Paperbox Mahakali caves Road Greater Bombay Andheri West , Maharashtra- 400093
22-8-2010
31. 7772593
Ranuja Jewellers 161 , Zaveri . Bazar, Shaikh Memon Street , Ground Floor Greater Bombay Mumbai Maharashtra -400002 29-4-2010
32. 7735082
Purnima Jewellers , Shop No. 4 , Motimahal , Near Fish Market , G.G. Road Thane Dombivli West , Maharashtra- 421202
33. 7790393 23-10-2010
Palak Jewellers , Shop No.2 Rajendra Kunj , Tandulwadi Road, Palghar Thane Saphale EastMaharashtra - 401102
[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
(6)
(5)
IS 1417 :
1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 :
1999
Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 :
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 GoldandGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 :
1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999 GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999 Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery /Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification 4143
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
(5)
(6) (3)
(4)
(1) (2)
IS 1417:
34. 7788410 18-10-2010
1999
Siddharth Jewellers Near Bank ofBaroda , Gokhale Road , Naupada Thane ,Thane West Maharashtra -400602
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
35. 7770892 15-8-2010
IS 1417: 1999
Mahavir Jewellers , 13 /B/3 , Jayant Niwas , Nehru Road , Bhaji Market Thane Dombivli East, Maharashtra -421201
Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
36. 7781897
IS1783:
27-9-2008
Part 1 : 1993
Drums , Large, Fixed Ends-Specification- Part1 :GradeA Drums
Time Mauser Ind, (P) Ltd. SurveyNo.- 169 & 191 , Village Dhamani , Post-Ambeghar Raigarh Pen Maharashtra -402107
IS 1786:
37. 7736488 2-5-2008
1985
Srithik Rolling Pvt . Ltd. Plot No. 122-127 , Industrial Estate North Goa , Bicholim Goa-403504
Specification for high strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement
8-5-2010
IS 1417 :
38. 7737591
1999
B B Banthia Jewellers 776 , MG Road , Raigarh Panvel Maharashtra -410206
GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 :
26-7-2010
39.. 7765697
1999
GoldandGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Treasure , 102 , Morya Eatate , Opp. Infinity Mall , Andheri- Oshiwara, New Link. Road Greater Bombay Andheri West Maharashtra 400053
IS 1417 :
40. 7729794 10-4-2010
Shraddha Jewels Pvt.Ltd.
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Plot No.4, BMC Industrial Estate , Sai Nagar Greater Bombay Kandiivali West Maharashtra 400067
IS 1417:
23-10-2010
41. 7790191
1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Gazdar Private Limited , Shah House , 1st Floor , Room No. 15, Opp . Colaba Police Station , Greater Bombay Colaba Maharashtra -400001
IS 1417:
42. 7790292 23-10-2010
1999
Sanskar Jewels Ltd. 1407, Panchratna Greater Bombay Opera House , Maharashtra- 400004
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
43: 7776807 10-9-2010
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Sanghavi Kapoor Chand Bhabutmalji & Sons Ajit Building, Murbad Road Thane , Kalyan West Maharashtra - 421301
IS 1417:
44. 7759807 8-7-2010
1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Royal Italian Jewellers Pvt . Ltd. Unit No. G1 -G4 , Bharat Industrial Estate , T.J.Road GreaterBombay, Sewree West Maharashtra -400015
IS 1417 :
15-7-2010
45. 7761790
1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Deep Diamond India Ltd. 6/B , Planet Industrial Estate , Subhash Road , Greater Bombay, Vile Parle East Maharashtra- 400057 4144
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
(3)
(1) (2)
(4)
46. 7733280 22-4-2010
Mahalaxmi Jewellers , 4th Desai Shoping , 3rd Carter Road, Greater Bombay, Borival East , Maharashtra- 400066
4-7-2010
47. 7757601
P.R. Vaishampayan & Sons 60 -Main Road , Near Chitra Mandir Talkies , Nashik Nasnik , Maharashtra- 422001
48. 7756191 27-6-2010
Kamlesh Jewellers , Shop No. 1.0 , Godavari Building , Mukund Patil Lane , J.P.Road Greater Bombay, Andheri West . Maharashtra - 400058 49. 7735385 29-4-2010
Pankaj Jewellers , Mohamad Ali Chowk , Station Road , Thane Kalyan , Maharashtra- 421301
50, 7746693 28-5-2010
Santosh Vinayak Bhadekar Jewellers , 28 , Hendre Mension- Gokhale Road (North) Greater Bombay , Dadar West , Maharashtra - 400028 51. 7751181 12-6-2010
P. Valchand Jewellers 7 , Suman Patil Building, Junction of S.V.And J.P.Road, Greater Bombay , Andheri West , Maharashtra-400058 52. 7789412 23-10-2008
The Supreme Industries Ltd. , D-101 , 102 , MIDC Area, Jalgaon , JALGAON , Maharashtra - 425003 53. 7744386 23-5-2010
Sha Kaluram Jodhavat and Co. 29 , Dagina Bazar , Mumbadevi Road , Greater Bombay , Mumbai Maharashtra 400002 17729895 10-4-2010
Vaibhav Gold Shop No.9, Gulab Baug, M.G. Road, Opp. Railway Station , Greater Bombay , Santacruz West , Maharashtra- 400054 $5. 7745186 27-5-2010
Lagu Bandhu Motiwala Pvt . Ltd. , C - 102 , Kohinoor Apts . , N.C.Kelkar Marg, Greater Bombay , Dadar West , Maharashtra-400028 12-8-2010
56. 7769608
Shree Kalptaru Jewels ( 1) Pvt . Ltd. , 109 ,Ganpat Bhavan , Ist Floor , 68/72 Dhanji Street, GreaterBombay, Mumbai , Maharashtra - 400003
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] (5)
(6)
IS 1417: 1999
GoldandGoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 4984 : 1995
Specification for high density polyethylene Pipes for potable water Supplies
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery / Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Goldand GoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
(1) (2)
(3)
(4) 57. 7733381 22-4-2010
Arati Jewellers , 4th Himalaya Apts , Opp . Dena Bank, Greater Bombay, Santacruz, East Maharashtra -400055
58. 7740479 15-5-2010
Mayura Jewellers , 8A, Vraj Vihar Shoping Centre , Sector No. 16 , Airole Thane , Navi Mumbai , Maharashtra - 400708
59. 7786103 14-10-2010
Satyam Jewellers , 7B, Chirag . Building, Mount Road, Matarpakhadi Road , Greater Bombay Mazgaon ( TT) , Maharashtra -400010
25-9-2010
60. 7780794
D.P Zaveri , 281 , Jumma Masjid, Greater Bombay, Zaveri Bazar , Maharashtra- 400002 61. 7788511 18-10-2010
Rajiv S Modi , 172 Pushpak Apartment, 17th Floor, 31 AltamountRoad , Greater BombayMumbai , Maharashtra -400026 62. 7768303 6-8-2010
Mahesh Jewellers Plot No. 46 , T Line , Shop No.1 , Bainganwadi - Shivajinagar Greater Bombay Govandi Maharashtra -400043
63. 7785606 14-10-2010
Omkar Jewellers Pvt . Ltd. , Shop Nos . 8 & 9 , Sunrays Shopping Mall , Charkop Market, Greater Bombay, Kandivali West , Maharashtra- 400067 64. 7731882 17-4-2010
V.D.Jewellers 2 , Paras Sadan , Station Road, GreaterBombay , Vikhroli , West , Maharashtra -400083
65. 7768097 6-8-2008
TimeMauser Ind . (P) Ltd. VillageDhamani ,Post- Ambeghar , Raigarh , Pen , Maharashtra 66. 7787610 17-10-2010
Pallavi Jewellers , Shop No.6 , Raghukul Deep Building, Baji Prabhu Chowk, Phadke Road, Thane Dombivali East Maharashtra-421201 67. 7769507 12-8-2008
Victory Exim Pvt . Ltd. , 29 , Shsh Industrial Premises Deonar , Govandi , Greater Bombay, Mumbai , Maharashtra 68. 7769709 12-8-2010
T& FORO Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd. 9 , Janata Compound , 162, S.B.Marg, Greater Bombay, Lower Parel , Maharashtra -400013
4145
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
(5)
(6)
IS 1417 :
1999
Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Goldand GoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417: 1999
GoldandGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417: 1999
GoldandGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification.
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and GoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417:
1999
Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417: 1999
GoldandGoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1783 :
Part2 : 1988 Drums , large, fixed ends , Part 2 Grade B drums
IS 1417 :
1999
Goldand GoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 13592 : 1992
Specification for UPVC pipesfor soil and waste discharge systems inside buildings including ventilation and rainwater system
IS1417:
1999
Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4146
(4)
(3)
(1) (2)
15-5-2010
69. 7740378
Boutique De Emerald India Ltd. , 101-106, Neelkanth Commercial Centre , Sahar Road, Greater Bombay , Andheri East , Maharashtra- 400099
6-8-2010
70. 7767907
Richi Jewels , 44/1 , Upper Floor, Dagina Bazar , Mumbadevi Road , Greater Bombay, Mumbai , Maharashtra-400002 10-4-2010
71. 7730072
Milan Jewellers , Ashkunj , Shop No. 9 , N.G. Acharya Marg , Govandi Road, Opp . Madura Bank, Greater Bombay, Chembur, Maharashtra -400071 11-9-2010 :
72. 7777708
Gajari Jewellers , A - 2 , Yasho Mangal Shopping Centre, Achole, Tulinj Corner , Thane, Nallasopara East , Maharashtra -401209 27-6-2010
73. 7754591
Subodh Jewellers , 588 -A, Subodh Darshan , J.S.S. Road, Greater Bombay , Chira Bazar , Maharashtra 400002
2-10-2010
74. 7783194
Rajshree Jewellers , Opp . Takshila Building No. 2, Mahakali Caves Road, Greater Bombay, Andheri , East, Maharashtra -400093 17-6-2010
75. 7752789
SilverEmporium 2/8 , Mahajan Gali , Shop No. 8 , Greater Bombay , Zaveri Bazar , Maharashtra- 400002
16-5-2010
76. 7740681
SolarExports , 149 , Sheikh Menon Street , Bherumal House , 1st Floor Greater Bombay, Mumbai , Maharashtra -400002 2-9-2010
77. 7775401
Raju Jewellers , Shop No. 4, Shanti Niketan Building , Agashi Road (C.S.Marg) Thane , Virar West Maharashtra -401303 23-7-2010
78. 7763491
Leelaz Jewels Pvt . Ltd. , 23/25 , Prakash Bhuwan , 2nd Floor, 2nd Agiyri Lane , Opp .Nasta Galli , Greater Bombay, Zaveri Bazar , Maharashtra -400003
[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
(6)
(5)
IS 1417:
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 14'17:
1999
GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417:
1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery /Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417:
1999
GoldandGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417 :
1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417 :
1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417:
1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
(3)
(1) (2)
(4) 79. 7770791 15-8-2010
PeralExport Company,403 , Imperial Plaza , Dr. K.B. HedgewarMarg, Greater Bombay, Bandra West Maharashtra -400050
5-8-2010
80. 7767705
M.R.Shanklesha Jagannath Niwas , Shop No.2 , Opp . Vishnu Mandir , Ghela Devi Chowk , Bazar Peth , Thane , Kalyan West , Maharashtra- 421301 81. 7727083 1-4-2010
Shirodker Jewellers Pvt . Ltd. , 4, Hotel Samart Building, Dara Vaidya Road, North Goa, Panaji , Goa-403001 82. 7772694 22-8-2010
H.V. Jewels Pvt . Ltd. Dreamland Building, 3rd Floor, Block No. A- 1 , Greater Bombay , Opera House , Maharashtra -400004
83. 7747594 3-6-2010
Parihar Jewellers , Luxmi Hajari Chawl , Shop No. 4, Koldongri , Sahar Road , Greater Bombay, Andheri East, Maharashtra -400069
84. 7752183 17-6-2010
Tirupati Jewellers , Tendulkar SadanBuilding , Shop No. 1 , Uttan Road , Near Datt Mandir Thane , Bhayander West Maharashtra-401101 85. 7762590 19-7-2010
Dezire Jewels Pvt . Ltd. 419 Panchratna Co. Op.HSG Society, 4th Floor , Opera House , Greater Bombay , Charni Road, Maharashtra- 400007 86. 7785909 14-10-2010
Diajewel , 106, Shreeji Darshan , Tata Road No. 2, Opp . Prasad Chamber , GreaterBombay, Girgaum Maharashtra 400004 24-4-2010
87. 7734585
MilanGold, Opp . Municiple Hospital , Bazar Peth , Thane Vasai Village, West Maharashtra 401201
\
88. 7730880 12-4-2010
Pratigya Jewellers , 105 , Vijprabha Coplex , Pathkar Road, Near Kamath Medical Thane , Dombivli East , Maharashtra 421201 89. 7734484 24-4-2010
Lokdeep Jewellers , 5 , Jewel . Arcade, 123 , Water Field Road, Greater Bombay , Bandra West , Maharashtra- 400050
4147
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
(5)
(6)
IS 1417:
1999
Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417: 1999
GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417: 1999
GoldandGoldAlloys, Jewellery/Artefacts- Firneness and Marking Specification
IS 1417: 1999
GoldandGoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking . Specification
IS1417: 1999
Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
GoldandGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification 4148
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
(3)
(4)
(1) (2)
25-9-2010
90. 7780895
Janaki Jewellers , & C.A. Pendurkar& Co. Shop No.46 , Shyamkamal- A, C.R. Agrawal Market, Monghibai Road Greater Bombay , Vile Parle East Maharashtra 400050 91. 7735789 30-4-2008
StarAppliances Pvt . Ltd. 3 , MIRA Co. Op . Ind . Estate, Miragaon Thane Mira Road East Maharashtra 400104 12-7-2010
92. 7761588
Poonam Jewellers , Lal Chakki Chowk , Veer SavarkarMarg . Station Road, Thane Ulhasnagar East Maharashtra 421004
93. 7729592 9-4-2010
Neek Kamal Jewellers , 1 , Basant Niwas , Gupte Road Thane Dombivli West Maharashtra 421202 5-8-2010
94. 7766905
Madhavi Jewellers , 17/19 , Dhanji Street, 2nd Floor , ShopNo. 15, Greater Bombay , Mumbai , Maharashtra -400003 28-8-2010
95. 7773393
JetGems , 1 , Sandesh Building 28thRoad, Off Linking Road, GreaterBombay , Bandra West Maharashtra 400050 96. 7728287 3-4-2010
Jewellery Pednekar, Shop No.1 , MunicipalMarket , South Goa Mapusa Goa, Goa 403507 17-5-2010
97. 7742483
Kundan Jewellers , Opp . Canara Bank, Joshi Bag, Station Road Thane , Kalyan West Maharashtra- 421301 98. 7751484 13-6-2008
Silvassa Wooden Drums 501 , Express Chamber , Opp Natraj Studio , Andheri -Kurla Road, Andher (East ) Greater Bombay, Mumbai - Maharashtra- 400069
99. 7787408 17-10-2010
PatelOrnaments , 24 - B , Shyam Kamal - C Wing, Agarwal Market, Opp . Hotel Parle International Greater Bombay, Vile Parle East- Maharashtra- 400057
8-7-2010
100.7759197
Vishawas Vaidya Gadgil Saraf, 7 - B - 7 , Laxmi Niwas , Bombay Glass Works , J. K. Sawant Marg, Matunga Road West, Greater Bombay , Mahim Maharashtra - 400016
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
(6)
(5)
IS 1417 : 1999
Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 2347 : 2006
Domestic Pressure Cookers- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417: 1999
GoldandGoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery /Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys, Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 3975 : 1999
Mild steel wires , formed wires and tapes for armouring of cables
IS 1417 :
1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 :
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification 4149
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
(4)
(3)
(1) (2)
4-6-2010
101. 7747796
Creative Gems & Jewellery Pvt. Ltd. , New Shivleela Co. Op. Co. , Operative HSG. Society, 2nd Floor , Room No. 204, Alibhai Premji Road Greater Bombay, Grantroad East, Maharashtra -400007
8-7-2008
102. 7759096
Vintex Fire Protection Pvt . Ltd .. UnitNo. 1 , Ashok Indl . Estate L.B.S. Marg, Near Nirmal Life Style, Greater Bombay, Mulund (W), Maharashtra-400080
16-8-2010
103. 7771086
Triveni Jewellers Shop No.2 , Jayant Niwas , Bhaji Market , Nehru Road , Thane, Dombivli , EastMaharashtra , 421201
17-6-2010
104.7752082
Haresh Jewellers 30, Dhanji Street , Shop No. 16, Above PopulerArcade, 2nd Floor ,, Greater Bombay , Mumbai Maharashtra -400003
24-10-2008
105.7790494
Tulsi Extrusions Ltd. N -99 , M.I.D.C. Area, Jalgaon JALGAON Maharashtra- 425003
13-5-2010
106. 7738896
Pankaj Jewellers , Jain Bhuvan , Shop No.6 , Dr. B.A. Road, Next to Parel Flyover Greater Bombay, Parel Maharashtra- 400012
14-10-2010
107.7785808
Sanghavi & Sons , 191 , Kalbadevi Road, Ist Floor, Near Cotton Exchange, Greater Bombay, Kalbadevi , Maharashtra -400002
2-5-2008
108. 7736185
Savitri Steels Industries D- 12, Madkaim Industrial Estate , Madkaim , South Goa, PONDA Goa-403404
11-9-2010
109. 7777506
Jayantilal Jewellers 257 -B, Tulsi BhavanGreater Bombay, Zaveri Bazar , Maharashtra- 400002
4-7-2010
110.7757803
New Mahalaxmi Jewellers Shop No. B/ 12 , S.G. Barve Marg , Neharu Nagar Greater Bombay , Kurla East Maharashtra -400024
5-6-2010
111. 7749396
CNC Dia Jewels Pvt . L 167/171 , Gambhir Bhawan , Near Bank of India , Sheikh Memon Street, Greater Bombay , Zaveri Bazar -Maharashtra 400002 2745 G1 /08-13
(6)
(5)
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 13849:
1993
Specification for Portable fireextinguisher dry powder type (constant pressure)
S1417 : -999
GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999
GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 10124:
Part 1 : 1988 Specification for fabricated PVC fittings for potable watersupplies: Part 1 General requirements
IS 1417:
1999
GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 :
1999 Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1786 :
1985 Specification for high strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement
IS 1417: 1999 Gold andGoldAlloys, Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery//Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification 4150
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
112. 7762691 19-7-2010
Dalichand Chunnilal Jewellers Shop No. 3 , Balaji Darshan , Tilak Road , Greater Bombay , Santacruz West Maharashtra- 400054
113.7773797 29-8-2010
Shree Vardhman Jewellers , 8 , 1st Floor , Ladiwala Cham- bers , 11/13 Shaikh Memon Street, Greater Bombay, Kalbadevi , Maharashtra- 400002
114.7771389 19-8-2010
Saibya Jewellry , Anjali Building , 101 /A , French Bridge, Greater Bombay, Opera House , Maharashtra, 400007
115.7785707 14-10-2010
Vasu Jewellers , 617 , Sonar Ali , Goregaon , Raigarh Mangaon, Maharashtra- 402103
116.7754692 27-6-2010
Sharda Jewellers , Shop No. 6 , Nureses Quarters (Municipal Building No. 1 ) , Opp . Bhaji Market , Thane , Ambarnath West, Maharashtra -421 501 117.7775296 2-9-2010
OmPrakash Jewellers , Shree PantSamarth Apartment , Shop No. 12 , Chatrapati . Shivaji Road, Opp . Vitthal Mandir , Thane , Virar West , Maharashtra -401 303 118.7746390 28-5-2010
Sangeeta Art Jewellers , Kashi Vishveshwar Temple , Shop No. 2 , T. H.Kataria Road , Greater Bombay, Matunga West , Maharashtra - 400 016 119.7778306 16-9-2010
Inter Jewels (Mumbai ) Pvt . Ltd. , Plot No. 53/1 , Road No.7 MIDC Industrial Area , Opp . Akruti Trade Centre , Greater Bombay , Andheri East , Maharashtra -400 093 120.7746491 30-5-2010
G.Hastimal & Bros. Jewellers , Balkrishna Niwas , 2nd Road , Greater Bombay Khar West, Maharashtra - 400 052 121.7737793 8-5-2010
Vega Jewellery, 123 , Khurana Compound, Building No. 2, 2nd Floor , 1 - B Patel Road, Greater Bombay, Gore East, Maharashtra - 4000 122.7789210 21-10-2010
Sanghvi Keshrimal Satraji , Shop No. 3 , Gandhi Chowk Bazar Peth , Thane , Kalyan West, Maharashtra - 421 301
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ) (5)
(6)
IS 1417: 1999
Goldand GoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking , Specification
IS 1417: 1999 Gold and GoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and GoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999 Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness amd Marking Specification
IS 1417 : 1999 Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking , Specification 4151
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
(5)
(3)
(4)
(6) (1) (2)
123. 7782192 30-9-2008
IS 7834
Part 1 : 1987
Anjali Agro Plast, M - 11 , MIDC Area , Jalgaon , JALGAON , Maharashtra- 425 003
Specification for injection moulded PVC fittings with solvent cement joints for water supplies : Part 1 General requirements
19-8-2010
124.7771591
IS 1417 : 1999
Alankar Jewellers , 211/213 , Kalbadevi Road , 3rd Floor, Greater Bombay , Mumbadevi , Maharashtra- 400 002
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 125.7738795 10-5-2010
Bharti Jewellers , S.M. Road , Antop Hill , Greater Bombay, Wadala East , Maharashtra- 400037
Goldand GoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
126. 7785404 14-10-2010
IS 1417: 1999
Mahavir Jewellers , Shop No. 3/106 , S.B.S. Road , Near FireBrigade , Greater Bombay, Colaba, Maharashtra -400 005
GoldandGoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
127.7771187 16-8-2008
IS 4246: 2002
GeeIndustries, Gala- 12, Noble Industrial Estate No. 1 , Navghar, Thane , Vasai East , Maharashtra -401 210
Domestic Gas Stoves for use with Liquefied Petroleum Gases- Specification
128.7731781 17-4-2010
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Bhairav Jewellers , 10 , Annex Apartment , Near Kalina Village Bus Stop , Kurla Kalina Road, Greater Bombay, Santa- cruz East , Maharashtra- 400029
129.7765394 25-7-2010
IS 1417 : 1999
Mehta Sesmal Juharmalji & Co. 43, Dagina Bazar, Mumbadevi Road, Greater Bombay, Mumbai , Maharashtra -400 002
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
130.7735486
IS 1417: 1999 29-4-2010
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Dinesh Jewellers , 56 , Chuim Village , Dr. Ambedkar Road , Dandpada , Greater Bombay , Khar West , Maharashtra- 400052
131.7772492 22-8-2010
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Star Jewels , 109 , Vaishali Ind. Estate, Balkrishna Tawde Road , Mhatre Wadi , Greater Bombay Dahisar West , Maharashtra- 400068
22-4-2010
132.7733179
IS 1417: 1999
Palshetkar Jewellers , Pvt . Ltd. Mukund Mansion , N.C. Kelkor Road , Greater Bombay Dadar Maharashtra 400 028
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness annd Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999 133.7745085 27-5-2010
S.M.Mhapralkar Jewellers , 220/228 , J.S.S.Road Greater Bombay Girgaon Maharashtra 400004
GoldandGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
11-4-2010
IS 1417: 1999 134.7730173
Panalal C. Zaveri 2 , Empire House , S.V. Road , IRLA Greater Bombay Vile Parle West Maharashtra 400 056
GoldandGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification 4152
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
(3)
(1) (2)
(4)
30-4-2010
135.7735890
Sha Shelaji Asaji & Co , 47 , Safiya Manzil , Shop No.3 , Dr. Meisheri Road, Dongri Greater Bombay Mumbai Maharashtra 400009
136.7759908 9-7-2010
Rajendra Jewellers , Babubhai Tanna Building, Mohamedali Chowk, Station Road Thane Kalyan West Maharashtra 421301
137.7739191 14-5-2010
Vikram Jewellers , Vikram Bhavan , Ranade Road Greater Bombay Dadar West Maharashtra 400028 17-4-2010
138.7731680
Anil Jewellers 9A , Dhuruwadi , Ranade Road, Opp . Waman Hari Peth Greater Bombay Dadar Maharashtra 400028 139.7773696 29-8-2010
Javeri's3 , Govinda Building, M.G.Road , Off 18th June Road North Goa Panaji Goa403001
140.7731983 17-4-2010
Raju Jewellers Shop No.4, Bodke Building, S.V.P. Road Greater Bombay Mulund West Maharashtra 400080 2-5-2008
141.7736791
Goa Ispat Ltd. E- 6 , Madkaim Industrial Estate , North Goa Ponda Goa 403404 8-5-2010
142.7737692.
Raj Shree Jewellers , 5 Raghukuldeep Building, Baji Prabhu Chowk , Phadke Road Thane Dombivli East Maharashtra 421201 43.7788006 17-10-2010
Zaveri Kapoorchand Dali- chand Shop No. 11 , Dagina Bazar , Mumbadevi Road GreaterBombay Mumbai Maharashtra 400002 18-10-2010
144.7788612
Shah Traders , BNM Jewellers 807 , Panch Ratna Greater Bombay Opera House Maharashtra 400004 17-10-2010
145.7788107
Mahavir Jewellers , Gokhle Road, Naupada , Near Canara Bank Greater Bombay Thane West Maharashtra 400602
24-6-2008
146. 7754187
SuvikasAlloys & Steel Pvt . Ltd. Gut No.65/ 2 , Gatesh Village (Budruk) , Shirish Pada , Khaniwali Road Thane Wada Maharashtra 400602
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]
(6)
(5)
IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999 GoldandGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999 Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 GoldandGoldAlloys . Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 2830 : 1999 Carbon steel cast billet ingots , billets , blooms and slabs for re - rolling into steel for general structural purposes
IS 1417 : 1999 Gold andGold Alloys . Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys . Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999 Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1786 : 1985 Specification for high strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement 41.53
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008 / श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
(6)
(4)
(5)
(3)
(1) (2)
IS 1417 : 1999 147.7784604 4-10-2010
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Sudarshan Jewellers ,7 , Marwadi Building, Opp. Derasai Lane , M.G. Road Greater Bombay Ghatkopar EastMaharashtra 400086
IS3575: 1993
Bitumen drums
148.7768606 7-8-2008
Dimple Drums & Barrels Pvt. Ltd. Gulsunde Village Raigarh Rasayani Maharashtra 410207
IS 1417: 1999 8-5-2010
149. 7737490
GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Vinayak Jewellers, Shop No. 6,7,8 , Gulab Baug , Sai Laxmi Bazar , M.G.Road Greater Bombay Santacruz West Maharashtra 400054
IS 1417: 1999 150. 7732682 19-4-2010
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Bhagyashree Jewellers , 81, Dhanji Street , Chandra Darshan , Ist Floor Greater Bombay , Mumbai Maharashtra - 400002
IS 1417 : 1999 151.7783295 2-10-2010
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Silverline Jewellers , Pvt . Ltd. 5 , Johar Palace , Ist Floor , 299 , Kalbadevi Road Greater Bombay, Mumbai Maharashtra - 400002
26-4-2010
IS 1417 : 1999 152. 7734888
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Riddhi Siddhi Jewellers , 1&3 , Jehangir Building , Jehangir Mervanji Street Off. Dr. Ambedkar Road Greater Bombay Parel T.T. Maharashtra 400012
13-6-2010
153.7751585
IS 1417 : 1999
Ratnakala Jewellers , 2, Mukund Niwas , Manpada Road , Thane , Dombivli East , Maharashtra - 421201
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
30-5-2010
IS 1417: 1999 154. 7746592
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
G.M.Gold , Shop No.76, Citi Centre S.V. Road Greater Bombay, Goregaon West , Maharashtra - 400062
IS 1417 : 1999 155.7752688 17-6-2010
Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Sha Rupaji Jethaji & Sons 129 , Bhanadri Street , Ground Floor , Near Gol Deval Greater Bombay , Mumbai Maharashtra- 400004
IS 1417 : 1999 23-5-2010
156. 7744588
:
GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery /Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
P.J Shanklesha Jewellers , nx 7/8 , Devidayal Tower, Opp . Kolsewadi , Police Station Thane , Kalyan East Maharashtra -421306
12-4-2010
IS 1417: 1999 157.7730779
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Panalal C Zaveri , B - 36, Shyamkamal Building, Agarwal Market , Greater Bombay, Vile Parle East Maharashtra - 400057 4154
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
(4)
(1) (2)
(3)
158. 7770690 15-8-2010
Porshe Jewels , Atria Mille- niumMall , 310A , 3rd Floor , Dr. Annie Beasant Road , Greater Bombay, Worli Maharashtra- 400018 159. 7770589 15-8-2010
Vipul Jewellers , Shop No. 1 / UniqueApartment , P.P. Marg , Opp. Bus Depot, Thane , Virar West, Maharashtra -401303 160. 7777405 11-9-2010
Madhuri Jewellers , Sainath Apartment , Shop No.7 , Opp . Siddharth Hospital , Thane VirarWest , Maharashtra- 401303
161. 7775094 2-9-2010
Bharati Jewellers , Om Laxmi Shopping Centre, Shop No. 2, Tanki Road , Tulinj Thane Nallasopara East , Maharashtra- 401209
162. 7781796 27-9-2010
Anmol Jewellers , Panchratna Shop No. 1 , Bolinj Naka, Near M.M. Hotel , Thane , Virar East Maharashtra
163. 7766194 30-7-2010
Swarn Shilp 44,46 , Dhanji Street , Ist Floor , The Jewel Co-Op Housing Society, Greater Bombay, Zaveri Bazar, Maharashtra - 400003 164, 7728388 3-4-2010
Raju Jewellers , Shop No.3 , Suresh Patil Chawl , M.P.Lane , J.P.Road, Greater Bombay , Andheri West , Maharashtra- 400058
165. 7760081 9-7-2008
Vintex fire Protection Pvt. Ltd, Unit No. 1 , Ashok Indl . Estate , L.B.S.Marg , Near Nirmal Life Style , Greater Bombay Mulund ( W) Maharashtra -400080 166. 7748293 5-6-2010
Five Star Diamonds , 4-G, Navratna Benham , Hall Lane , 8 - Dr . DD Sathe Marg Greater , Bombay Mumbai , Maharashtra - 400004 167. 7786911 15-10-2010
M Shantilal Shobhavat & Co. , Jewellers Kamal Niwas , NC Kelkar Road Greater, Bombay Dadar West Maharashtra - 400028 17-10-2010
168. 7788309
G. V. Singhi & Co. , 550/52 , J. S. S. Road , Greater Bombay Chira Bazar , Maharashtra - 400002
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] (5)
(6)
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS4947: 2006
Specification for gas cartridges for use in fire extinguishers ,
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold andGold Alloys . Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417 :
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
(1 ) (2)
(3)
(4) 169. 7790595 23-10-2010 Prakash Jewellers Viman , Darshan, Shop No. 12, Bail Bazar , Old Kurla , Greater Bombay, Mumbai , Maharashtra- 400070 170. 7737187 7-5-2008
Mandovi Metals Pvt . Ltd. 200 -A , Kundaim Industrial Estate , Kundaim Ponda , Goa , North Goa , Kundaim , Ponda , Goa 171. 7785505 14-10-2010
Sudhakar B Shirwadkar , Jewellers Vishwadeep Building, Bajiprabhu Chowk , Greater Bombay, Dombivli East , Maharashtra-421201 172. 7773494 29-8-2010
MilanJewellers 5, Manish Apartment, Mathuradas Road, GreaterBombay, Kandivali West , Maharashtra - 400067 173. 7788208 17-10-2010 Zee Bangles 148 , L. K. Market, Greater Bombay, Zaveri Bazar, Maharashtra -400002 174. 7761285 11-7-2008
RathiRe - Rollers ( 1 ) Limited , 151/1/4 Kuvapada Village - Silli , Silvassa Cut of Dadra & Nagar Haveli Dadra and Nagar Haveli Silvassa Dadra amd Nagar Haveli 175. 7747695 4-6-2010
Royal Chains Unit , No. 203-205, Bharati Industrial , Estate , T. J. Road Greater Bombay Sewree West Maharashtra -400015 176. 7768808 7-8-2010
New Vivek Jewellers , Shop No. 7 , Padmashali Co - Op . Housing Society Ltd. 60 Feet Road, Matunga Labour Camp , Greater Bombay Matunga, Maharashtra -400019 177. 7773292 28-8-2010
Sangeeta Jewellers 9,Gulab Mahal Building, SaneGuruji Marg , Greater Bombay, Tardeo, Maharashtra -400003 178. 7783396 2-10-2010
Trance Jewellery Pvt . Ltd. Krishna Niwas , 4th Floor, Rajaram , Mohanroy Road, GreaterBombay, Charni Road East , Maharashtra-400004
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
4155 (5)
(6)
IS 147:
1999
Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 2830 : 1992
Carbon Steel Cast Billet Ingots, Billets , Blooms and Slabs for re- rolling into steel for general structural purposes
IS 1417:
1999
GoldandGold Alloys, Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
GoldandGoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1786: 1985
Specification for high Strength Deformed Steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and GoldAlloys, Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4156
(4) (3)
(1) (2)
15-5-2010
7740580
179.
Nice Diamonds (1 ) Pvt . Ltd. Kanchwala Building, Ist Floor , 63, Dhanji Street , Greater Bombay, Mumbai Maharashtra -400003
Bharatsons Jewellers 28-6-2010
180. 7756292
5, Panchsheel , 213 , Waterfield Road. off Linking Road , Greater Bombay Bandra West Maharashtra -400050 19-6-2008
7753488
181.
Vintex fire Protection Pvt . Ltd. Unit No. 1 , Ashok Indl . Estate , L.B.S. Marg, Near Nirmal Life Style, Greater Bombay , Mulund (W) Maharashtra -400080 23-7-2010
7763289
182.
Surbhi Jewellers , Shop No. 9 , M. U. Corner , Tilak Road , Greater Bombay, Santacruz West , Maharashtra -400054 26-7-2010
7765495
183.
Vrajlal&Co. C-3 B , Hermes House, 33/35 , M. P. Marg , GreaterBombay Opera House Maharashtra -400004 18-10-2010
7788814
184.
Sha Val Chand Lal Chand , Raka & Sons 79 , Bazar Peth, Opp . Bazar Peth Police Chowk, Thane Bhiwandi , Maharashtra -421302 21-10-2008
185. 7789311
Shree Nakoda Jewellers Shop No. 2 , Manazes Bhavan , Opp.Hanuman Mandir , Manickpur Naka Thane Vasai West Maharashtra -401202
29-4-2010
7734989
186.
Raju Jewellers Everest Building, Shop No. 10 Sheetal , MG Road, Vishnu Nagar Thane Dombivli West Maharashtra - 421202
13-9-2010
7778003
187.
Mansukhlal H. Bhimani Shop No. 1 , Jalaram Nagar No. 3, Vallabh Baug Lane Greater BombayGhatkopar East Maharashtra - 400077
20-5-2008
188. 7742988
Duraline India Pvt . Ltd. Plot Nos . 19-22 , 37-40, Phase IIIA, Sancoale Ind . Estate , Zuarinagar, SouthGoa , Goa-403726
13-10-2008
189.7789513
The Supreme Industries. Limited H-20 , (Unit- 11 ) , MIDC Jalgaon , Jalgaon , Maharashtra -425003
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) |
(6)
(5)
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 940:
2003
PortableFireExtinguisher , Water Type (Gas Cartridge ) Specification
4
IS 1417 :
1999 Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999 Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 :
1999 Gold and Gold Alloys . Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999 Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999 GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 14930:
Part 2: 2001 ConduitSystems for Electrical Installations- Particular Requiements- Conduit Systems Burried Underground
IS 14333:
1996 High density polyethylene Pipe for Sewerage- Specification [ भाग ।। खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
4157
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
(3)
(1) (2)
(5)
(4)
(6) 190. 7787812 17-10-2010
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Shubham Jewellers , Shop No. 3, Patel Chamber , N.G. Aacharya Marg Greater Bombay Chembur Maharashtra - 400071
191. 7743283 21-5-2010
IS 1417: 1990
Munot Ornaments Shop No.34/35, LK Market , Ist Lane GreaterBombay Zaveri Bazar Maharashtra -400002
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
192. 7744891 24-5-2010
IS 1417: 1999
Kaveri Jewellers Plot No. 24/T/ 1 , Shop No. 1 & 2 , Shivaji Nagar Greater Mombay Govandi Maharashtra -400043
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
193. 7772391 22-8-2010
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Arihant Jewellers Shop No. 7, Patel Building , M. G. Road Greater Bombay Mulund West Maharashtra -400080
194. 7731579、17-4-2010
IS1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Maha Ratnaraj Jewellers Mohmmed Ali Chowk , Station Road Thane Kalyan West Maharashtra- 421301
195. 7735284 29-4-2010
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Mahendra Jewellers 2, Pardeshi Building, Near Laxmi Market , Station Road Thane Kalyan West Maharashtra-4421301
196. 7771288 19-8-2008
IS 9537 : 1983
Conduits for Electrical Installations Part 3 Rigid Plain Conduits of Insulating Materials (Superseding IS: 2509 )
Perfect Plastics Gala No. 4 , Vighnaharta Compount , Pachava Mile , Near Tabor Ashram , Kalyan Murbad Road, Post Kamba Thane Maharashtra- 421301
197. 7753589 19-6-2008
IS10204: 2001
Specification for portable fire extinguisher Mechanical Foam Type
Vintex Fire Protection Pvt . Ltd .. Unit No. 1 , Ashok Indl . Estate, L.B.S. Marg , Greater Bombay Mulund (W) Maharashtra - 400080
198. 7767604 5-8-2010
IS 1417 : 6661
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Adya- Shakti Jewellers 36 , Suryamani Centre , 3rd Floor , 65/67 , Sutar Chawl Greater Bombay Zaveri Bazar Maharashtra -400002
199 , 7768404 7-8-2010
IS 1417: 1999
Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Twilight Gems Mfg . Co. Pvt . Ltd. Steel Made Industrial Estate , Unit No : 13 , Building No. 2, Marol Maroshi Road Greater Bombay Andheri East Maharashtra- 400059
2745 G1/08-14 4158
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
(4)
(3)
(1) (2)
200. 7753286 18-6-2010
Kishorchandra Keshavlal Bhavsar 94, Kansara Chawl , 2nd Floor , R. No. 44 , Kalbadevi Raod , Cotton Exchange , Greater Bombay Mumbai Maharashtra -400002 201. 7768707 7-8-2010
Babubhai Jewellers Shop No. 3 , Amarprem Building , Kharigaon , B.P. Raod , Thane , Bhayandar East , Maharashtra - 401105 14-10-2010
202. 7786002
Madhur Jewellers
Sainath Apartment , Shop No. 8 , Opp . Deshmukh Hospital , Chatrapati Shivaji Marg Thane , Virar West , Maharashtra- 401303 203. 7734282 23-4-2011
Utsav CZ Gold Jewels 70 , Apollo Industrial Estate , off Mahakali CavesRoad Greater Bombay , Andheri East , Maharashtra -400093 204. 7784705 9-10-2010
Rajendra Jewellers 6, Natraj Market , Opp . Kasturba Theatre Greater Bombay, Malad West , Maharashtra -400064 205. 7770286 15-8-2010
Ronak Jewellers Javant Niwas , Nehru Road, Bhaji Market, Thane , Dombivli East , Maharashtra - 421201 206. 7781901 27-9-2008
Victory Exim Pvt . Ltd. Plot No. 7 , Survey No. , 4A/4B , Village Honad , Khopoli Adoshi Road, Ganesh Grinding Mill , Raigarh Khopoli , Maharashtra.
4-10-2010
207. 7783804
V. Kapoor Jewels Pvt . Ltd. 225, Unique Industries , Bombay Dying Compound , Prabhadevi , Greater Bombay, Mumbai Maharashtra - 400025 208. 7767503 5-8-2010
Kuber Gold, 61 , Mahavir Shopping Centre , Agra Road, Thane, Kalyan West , Maharashtra- 421301 209. 7775603 4-9-2010
Sha Fulchand Jewellers Shop No. 9 , Narayan Wadi , Station Road , Thane , Kalyan West, Maharashtra -421301
14-10-2010
210. 7786204
Ambika Jewellers , Mahajan Gali Shop No. 1 , NearMumbadevi Temple Greater Bombay Zaveri Bazar Maharashtra - 400002
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]
(6)
(5)
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 4985 : 2000
Unplasticized PVC Pipes for Potable Water Supplics- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Geld and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 | P. K. GAMBHIR , Dy. Director General ( Marks ) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
4159
नई दिल्ली, 21 जुलाई , 2008
का.आ. 2057.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो प्रमाणन विनियम 1988 के विनियम 5 के उपविनियम ( 6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तारीख से रद्द कर दिया गया है : -
अनुसूची
क्रम संख्या लाइसेंस संख्या लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता
रद्द/स्थगित करने कीतिथि
'लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/ प्रक्रम सम्बद्ध भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक
1.
7736185
भा. मा. 1786 : 1985
20-08-2007
सावित्री स्टिलस इंडस्ट्रीज , डी-12 , मडकेम इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , मडकेम , पोंडा, गोवा-403 404.
2.
7328675
भा. मा. 4989 : भाग 3 : 1987 12-07-2007
के व्हि फायर केमिकल ( इंडिया ) प्रा.लि. सर्वे संख्या. 1159 , कमला नगर , पोस्ट- मुंधेगाव नाशिक , इगतपुरी -422 403.
3.
7340564
भा. मा.
13-06-2007
9537 : भाग 3 : 1983
मधु-प्लास्ट मधु कॉम्पेक्स, शिवाजी चौक , उल्हासनगर, जिला:ठाणे -421 301 .
[सं. सी एम डी/ 13:13 ]
पी. के. गम्भीर , उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर )
New Delhi , the 21st July, 2008
S.O. 2057. In pursuance of sub - regulation (6 ) of regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification ) Regulations , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which are given in the following Schedule have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each : Period 1-4-07 to 31-10-07 .
SCHEDULE
Sl . No. LicenceNo.
Name and Address of the
licensee
Date of Cancellation
Article/ Process with relevant Indian Standard covered by the licence cancelled
1 .
7736185
IS 1786 : 1985
20-08-2007
Savitri Steels Industries , D- 12 , Madkaim Industrial Estate , Madkaim South Goa , Ponda Goa-403404
2.
7328675
IS 4989 : Part 3 : 1987
12-07-2007
KV FireChemical ( India) Pvt . Ltd. Survey No. 1159 , Kamala Nagar , Post-Mundhegaon , Nasik , Igatpuri Maharashtra -422403
3.
7340564
IS9537 : Part 3 : 1983
13-06-2007
Madhu - Plast Madhu Complex, Shivaji Chowk, Thane , Ulhasnagar , Maharashtra -421003
[No. CMD/ 13 : 13]
P. K. GAMBHIR, Dy. Director General (Marks )
नई दिल्ली , 24 जुलाई , 2008
का.आ. 2058. - भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम, 1988 के विनियम 5 के उपविनियम ( 6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तारीख से रद्द/ स्थगित कर दिया गया है :-
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4160
अनुसूची
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता क्रम संख्या लाइसेंस संख्या सीएम/एल-
7259278
1 .
रिनाउन इंजीनियरिंग, प्लॉट नं 421-422 , जी आई डी सी इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , ओढव , अहमदाबाद -382410
2.
7708079
क्राम्टन ग्रीवस लि. , लाइटनिंग डिविजन , गाँव कुराल , ताःपादरा , जम्बूसर रोड , वडोदरा -391431 7778609
3.
फोर्ज तथा ब्लावर इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड , प्लाट नं. 233 , मोती प्रोटीन के सामने , सरखेज बावला हाइवे , चांगोदर अहमदाबाद -382210 4.
7783501
स्वागत इंडस्ट्रीज , बी 25 , प्रकाश इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , रीटा नगर , अमराईवाडी, अहमदाबाद-380028
PART 11 SEC. 3 (ii) |
रद्द/स्थगित लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत
करने की तिथि वस्तु/प्रक्रम सम्बद्ध
भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक
5-2-2008 फ्लोरोसेंट लैम्प आईएस 22:15 : 1983
30--4-2008 सैल्फ बलासिटड लैम्प फार जनरल लाइटिंग सर्विस आईएस 1511 , पार्ट 1 : 2002
30-4-2008 होरिजांटल सेंट्रीफयूजल पम्प आईएस 6595 पार्ट । : 2006 फार क्लीयर , कोल्ड वॉटर
30-4-2008 ओपनवैल सबमर्सिबल पम्पसैट
आईएस 14220: 1994
[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 13 ] पी. के. गम्भीर, उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर )
New Delhi , the 24th July, 2008
S.O. 2058. In pursuance of sub- regulation ( 6 ) of regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification ) Regulations . 1988 , ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which are given below have been cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each :
SCHEDULE
Sl . No. Licence No. CM/L-
Name and Address of the licensee
7259278
Renown Engineering, PlotNos . 421-422 , GIDC Industrial Estate, Odhav , Ahmedabad - 382410
7708079
2.
Crompton Greaves Ltd. , Lighting Division , Village Kurai , Tal : Padra , Jumbusar Road, Vadodara - 391431 7778609
3.
Forge and Blower Industries Limited, Plot No. 233 Opp . Moti Proteins , Sarkhej Bavla Highway , Changodar , Ahmedabad - 382002 4.
7783501
Swagat Industries , B - 25 , Pradash Indl . Estate . Near Rita Nagar, Amraiwadi , Ahmedabad- 380028
Date of Cancellation suspension Article /Process with relevant Indian Standards covered by the licence cancelled/ suspension
5-2-2008 Fluorescent Lamps
IS 2215 : 1983
30-4-2008 Selfballasted lamps for general lighting services , IS 1511 : Part 1 : 2002
30-4-2008 Horizontal Centrifugal Pumps for clear, cold water IS 6595 : Part - 1 : 2006
30-4-2008 Openwell submersible pumpsets IS 14220 : 1994
[No. CMD/13: 13] P. K. GAMBHIR, Dy . Director General (Marks) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4161
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008 / श्रावण 11 , 1930
नई दिल्ली , 24 जुलाई , 2008
का.आ. 2059.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम 1988 के नियम 4 के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं, वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :
अधिसूचना
मई 2008 में स्वीकृत किये गये अनुज्ञप्ति
क्रम संख्या
लाइसेंसी का नाम व पता
लाइसेंस संख्या
उत्पाद का नाम तथा आईएस
अनुज्ञप्तिस्वीकृत करने की तिथि (1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5) 1.
7841081
01-05-2008
मिलेनियम लैमिनेट प्रा. लि. , 306 , इस कान माल , तीसरी मंजिल , स्टार बाजार बिल्डिंग , जोधपुर चार रस्ता, सैटेलाइट, अहमदाबाद -380 015
डैकोरेटिव थरमोसैटिंग सिनथैटिक रेसिन बांडिड लैमिनेटिड शीट आई एस 2046: 1995
2.
7841384
05-05-2008
53 ग्रेड ओपी सी आई एस 12269: 1987
श्रीराम सिमेंट लिमिटेड, 305 , तीसरी मंजिल , समान काम्पलैक्स सत्यम माल के सामने , जोधपुर प्रेमचंदनगर रोड , सैटेलाइट , अहमदाबाद
3.
7841990
08-05-2008
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 1417: 1999
पदमावती जवैलर्स , बी60-61 , सरदार पटेल माल , डायमंड मिल के पास , निकोल गाम रोड , बापूनगर , अहमदाबाद
4.
7842083
08-05-2008
राधिकाज्वैलर्स, सी एच 624 , तथा 624/1 , गवारा रोड झंडा चोक , खंभात , डिस्ट्रिक्ट आनंद
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 1417: 1999
5.
7842184
08-05-2008
उत्सवीज्वैलर्स , गोविंद चकला चार रस्ता , श्री गेट के पास , विसनगर-384315
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 1417: 1999
6.
7842487
09-05-2008
जे एम गोल्ड पैलेस , 165 , देदकानी पोल के सामने , मानेक चौक, अहमदाबाद
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों /शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 1417: 1999
7.
7842992
13-05-2008
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 1417: 1999
विजय गोल्ड पैलेस , 1 वृंदावन शॉपिंग सेंटर , राबरी कालोनी के पास, वसतराल रोड, अमराई वाडी, अहमदाबाद
8.
7842891
13-05-2008
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 1417: 1999
शुभमज्वैलर्स, 14 , शिवानी एवेन्यू, एमको बैंक के सामने , जवाहर चौक चार रस्ता, मनीनगर , अहमदाबाद SHUBHAM JEWELLERS
9.
7843085
13-05-2008
उमियाज्वैलर्स, रामजी टैंमपल के पास, बावला-382220
'स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 1417: 1999
10.
7843590
14-05-2008
सबमर्सिबल पम्पसैट आई एस 8034 : 2002
मैसर्स मेधवषपुरा पम्प इंडस्ट्रीज , प्लाट नंबर सी 2/ए-6 , फेस 2 , जी आई डी सी एस्टेट , नरोडा अहमदाबाद
11.
7844491
वंदनाज्वैलर्स ,
19-05-2008
शेवाश काम्पलैक्स, गायत्री मंदिर रोड, महावीर नगर , हिम्मतनगर , साबरकांटा
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 1417 : 1999 4162
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
(2)
(3)
(1
7844592
12.
दागिना, 29 , श्रीराम शॉपिंग सेंटर , रेलवे स्टेशन रोड, धनेरा-385310
7844996
13.
स्वर्ण शिल्पी, पहली मंजिल , 110/111 , कनक चैम्बर्स गांधी रोड , अहमदाबाद 7845089
14.
लूबी सबमर्सिबल लिमिटेड , कल्याण मिलदा के पास , नरोडा रोड, अहमदाबाद
7845190
15.
चोकसी वालचंद प्रतापचंद ज्वैलर्स , एस सी 1 , राधे शॉपिंग माल , खोखरा सर्कल , मणीनगर ईस्ट, अहमदाबाद
7845897
16.
मंडलिया आर्ट ज्वैलर्स, टावर बाजार , आनंद 7846495
17.
डमिया पी वी सी पाईप तथा फिटिंग प्रा. लि. , बी 2 , अयोध्यानगर को ओप. हाउसिंग सोसाइटी , शाहीबाग डफनाला रोड, अहमदाबाद 7846701
18.
दागिना, 33 खुशबु शॉपिंग सेंटर , गार्डन रोड , डीसा बनंसकाटा 7840483
19.
ए एम ज्वैलर्स, ओमकार कामपलैक्स, जानी शेरी गांधी पोल , बडोदा
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
(5) (4)
19-05-2008 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 1417:1999
21-05-2008 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 1417: 1999
22-05-2008 मोटर फार सबमर्सिबल पम्पसैट आई एस 9283 : 1995
23-05-2008 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस 1417: 1999
26-05-2008 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस ! 417: 1999
28-05-2008 अनप्लास्टिसाइसड पी वी सी पाईप फार पो टेबल वाटर सपललाई IS 4985 :2000
29-05-2008 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 1417 : 1999
30-04-2008 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन आई एस 1417 : 1999
[सं. सीएमडी/ 13 : 11 ] पी. के. गम्भीर , उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर )
New Delhi , the 24th July, 2008
S.O. 2059. In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 5 ) ofthe regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulations , 1988, the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
Licences Granted during the Month May , 2008
Sl . No. Licence No.
Name of the Licensee and address
(1)
(2)
(3) 7841081
1 .
306, IScon Mall , Third Millennium Laminates Pvt . Ltd., Floor , Star Bazar Building, Jodhpur Char Rasta , Satelite , Ahmedabad , 380 015 2.
7841384
Shriram Cement Ltd. 305 3rd floor Samaan Complex Opp. Satyam Mall Jodhpur Premchandnagar Road , Stellite Ahmedabad
Date ofGOL Name of the product and IS Number
(4)
(5)
01-05-2008 Decorative Thermosetting Synthetic Resin Bonded Laminated Sheets IS 2046 : 1995
05-05-2008 53 Grade OPC IS 12269 : 1987 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4163
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
(2)
(1)
(3)
(4)
(5) 3.
7841990
08-05-2008
Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking IS 1417: 1999
Padmavati Jewellers , B -60-61 Sardar Patel Mall Near Diamond Mill Nikol Gam Road Bapunagar, Ahmedabad
4.
7842083
08-05-2008
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery / Artefacts- Fineness and Marking IS 1417: 1999
Radhika Jewellers , Ch-624 and 624/1 Gawara Road Zanda Chawk KhambhatDiat , Anand
5.
7842184
08-05-2008
Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking IS 1417 :1999
Utsavi Jewellers , Govind Chakla Char Rasta Near Three Gate Visnagar -384315
6.
7842487
09-05-2008
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking. IS 1417:1999
JMC Gold Palace 165 Opp Dedkani Pole MG Haveli Road Manekchowk , Ahmedabad
7.
7842992
13-05-2008
GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking IS 1417: 1999
VijayGold Palace 1 Vrundavan Shopping Centre , Near Rabari Colony Vastral Road , Amraiwadi , Ahmedabad
8.
7842891
13-05-2008
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking IS 1417: 1999
Shubham Jewellers , 14 Shivani Aveneu Opp Amco Bank Jawahar Chok Char Rasta Maninagar , Ahmedabad
9.
7843085
13-05-2008
UmiyaJewellers ,
Near Ramji Temple Bavla
382220
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking IS 1417 : 1999
7843590
10.
14-05-2008
Submersible Pumpsets IS 8034:2002
1
Meghvarsha Pump Industries , Plot No , C -2/A-6 , Phase- II , GIDC Estate , Naroda , Ahmedabad
11 .
7844491
19-05-2008
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking IS 1417:1999
Vandana Jewellers , Shevash Complex Gayatri Mandir Road MahavirNagar Himatnagar , Sabarkanta
12.
7844592
19-05-2008
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking IS 1417: 1999
Dagina, 29 Shreeram Shopping Centre Railway Station Road Dhanera - 385310
13.
7844996
21-05-2008
Swarna Shilpi First Floor 110/111 Kanak Chambers Gandhi Road , Ahmedabad
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking IS 1417 : 1999 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4164
(3)
(2)
(1)
7845089
14.
Lubi Submersible Ltd. , Near Kalyan Mills , Naroda Road , Ahmedabad
7845190
15.
Choksi Valchand Pratapchand Jewellers C/ 1 Radhe Shopping Mall Khokhra Circle Maninagar, East Ahmedabad
7845897
16.
Mandalia Art . Jewellers , Tower Bazar , Anand
7846495
17.
Umiya PVC Pipes and Fittings Pvt . Ltd. B - 2 Ayodhyanagar Co. op . Housing Society, Shahibaug Dafnala Road, Ahmedabad
7846701
18.
Dagina , 33 Khushbu Shopping Centre Garden Road Deesa Banaskantha
7840483
19.
AM Jewellers , Omkar Complex Jani Sheri Ghandiali Pole Vadodara
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) )
(5) (4)
22-05-2008 Motors for submersible pumpsets IS 9283 : 1995
23-05-2008 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking IS 1417: 1999
26-05-2008 Gold and Gold Alloys . Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking IS 1417: 1999
28-05-2008 Unplastizied PVC Pipes for Potable Water Supply IS4985: 2000
29-05-2008 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery / Artefacts- Fineness and Marking IS 1417 : 1999
30-04-2008 Gold and Gold Alloys . Jewellery / Artefacts- Fineness and Marking IS 1417:1999
[No. CMD/ 13.11 P. K. GAMBHIR . Dy. Director General (Marks)
नई दिल्ली , 25 जुलाई , 2008
का.आ. 2060. - भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम 1988 के विनियम 5 के उपनियम 6 के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तारीख से रद्द कर दिया गया है :
अनुसूची
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता क्रम संख्या लाइसेंस संख्या
(3)
(1)
(2)
1 .
7530569
श्री वूड आर्ट्स, सर्वे नं. 153 , प्लॉट सं. 4 अॅन्ड 5 , मौजे वेहले , ठाणे , ता. भिवंडी, मुंबई- 421-302 7440467
डी. के. इंडस्ट्रीज , प्लॉट नं. 55 , खेमानी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , ओ.टी. सेक्शन, उल्हासनगर, ठाणे -421 002
रद्द करने कीतिथि लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तुः प्रक्रम सम्बद्ध भारतीय मानक काशीर्षक
(5) (4)
28-11-2007 सामान्य उद्देश्यों के प्लाईवुड- विशिष्टि
25-02-2008 भा.मा. 2347 :2006
एल्युमिनियम मिश्रधातु सामग्री 'के धारिता 2 से 8 लिटर आन्तरिक ढक्कन किस्म और धारिता 2 से 12 लिटर बाह्य ढक्कन के घरेलु प्रेशर कुकर-विशिष्टि [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4165
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5) 3.
7695197
06-02-2008
नोबल पॉलिमर्स ,
भा.मा. 14333 : 1996
मल जल व्यवस्था के लिए उच्च घनत्व वाले पालिएथिलीन पाईप-
सर्वे नं. 110/2/6 , नंदिनी इस्टेट के सामने , अमली , दादरा और नगर हवेली , सिलवासा-396230
विशिष्टि: ( 1 ) पीई -80 , पीएन 2.5 , 75 डीएन से 315 डीएन , (2 ) पीई- 80 , पीएन-4 , 63 डीएन से 315डीएन से ( 3 ) पीइई-80 , पीएन--6 , 63डीएन से 315डीएन , (4 ) पीई- 80 , पीएन -10 , 63 डीएन. से 315 डीएन , ( 5 ) पीई-100 , पीएन-6 , 63डीएन से 315 डीएन , ( 6 ) पीई- 100, पीएन -8 , 63 डीएन से 315 डीएन , एन्ड ( 7 ) पीई -100 , पीएन -10 , 63 डीएन से 315 डीएन ।
[सं. सीएमडी/ 13: 13 ]
पी. के. गम्भीर, उपमहानिदेशक ( मुहर )
New Delhi , the 25th July, 2008
S.O. 2060.-In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 6 ) of regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification ) Regulations , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which are given in the following Schedule have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each : 1 November, 2007 to 31 March , 2008.
SCHEDULE
Sl .No. Licence No.
Name and address of the Licensee
Date of Cancellation
Article/Process with relevant Indian Standard covered by the licence cancelled
( 1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5) 1.
7530569
IS 303 : 1989
28-11-2007
Shree Wood Arts
S. No. 153 , Plot No. 4 & 5 , Mauje Vehle Thane Tal . Bhiwandi
Maharashtra - 421302
2.
7440467
IS 2347 : 2006
25-02-2008
D. K. Industries ,
Industrial Area , OT
Plot No. 55 , Khemani Section , Thane Ulhasnagar
Capacities 2 to 8 Litres Inner Ltd. , Type and Capacities 2 to 12 Litres Outer Ltd. , Type of Aluminium Alloy Material
Maharashtra -421002
3.
7695197
06-02-2008
IS 14333 : 1996
Noble Polymers ,
HDPE pipe for sewerage ( 1 )
Survey No. 110/2/6 , Opp. Nandini Estate , Amli , Silvassa , Dadra and Nagar Haveli , Silvassa Dadra and Nagar Haveli - 396230
PE- 880 , PN2.5 , 75DN to 315DN , (2) PE - 80 , PN6 , 63DN to 315DN , (3) PE -80 , PN6 , 63DN to 315DN , (4) PE - 80 , PN10 , 63DN to 315DN, (5) PE- 100, PN6 , 63DN to 315 DN, (6) PE - 100 , PN8 , 63DN to 315DN & (7 ) PE - 100, PN10, 63DN to 315DN .
[No. CMD/13: 13
P. K. GAMBIR, Dy. Director General (Marks) 2745 GI/ 08-15 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4166
[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली , 25 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2061.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो प्रमाणन विनियम 1988 के विनियम 4 के उपविनियम 5 के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे दिए गए हैं वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं: -
अनुसूची
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता लागू तिथि
लाइसेंस सं.
क्रम सं.
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
1. 7807384 23-12-2010 वरा ज्वेलर्स 1804, पंचरत्न, ओपेरा हाउस , मुंबई-400004
2. 7798716 22-11-2010 प्रकाश ज्वेलर्स और कंपनी शॉप संख्या-1 , इलोरा बिल्डिंग , कालिना- कुर्ला रोड , सांताक्रुझ (पूर्व) , मुंबई-400029 3. 7812377 13-01-2011 डिझाईन क्रिएशन 16/17 , रवी इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , 25 महाल इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , महाकाली केव्स रोड के सामने , अंधेरी ( पूर्व ) , मुंबई -400093
वैशाली ज्वेलर्स, 4. 7808386 23-12-2010 6, अब्दुल रेहमान बिल्डिंग , प्लाजा सिनेमा के सामने , शिवाजी मंदिर के नजदीक , एन.सी. केलकर रोड, दादर ( पश्चिम ) , मुंबई -400028 5. 7828594 23-03-2011 श्रीज्वेलर्स 36/37, सिद्धिविनायक अपार्टमेंट, गाला संख्या-3 , भाजी मार्केट , ठाणगेअली , भिवंडी, जिला : ठाणे-421302
23-03-2011
6. 7828796
श्री नेमिनाथ ज्वेलर्स दुकान संख्या-02 , मेहता मनोर, बी. पी. टी. कॉलिनी के सामने , 146 , वरली विलेज , मुंबई -400030
7. 7828695 23-03-2011 रेणुका इम्पेक्स , 104, धरम पेलेस , 100/103 , ह्युजेस रोड, ओपेरा हाउस , मुंबई-400007
8. 7809489 25-12-2010 कानाक्राट्का एक्सिम प्रा. लि. 271/273, मुंबादेवी रोड , मुंबादेवी मंदिर के सामने , तल माला , जवेरी बाजार , मुंबई-400002
9. 7818995 07-02-2011 चंद्रकांत वसंत सैतावडेकर ज्वेलर्स , सिद्धिसरस्वती, सोनारअली , हुतात्मा कान्हेरे चौक, तीनबत्ती नाका , खेड , रतनागिरी -415709 उत्पाद
भा. मा. सं./भाग/अनु/वर्ष
(6)
(5)
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
(1) ( 2)
(3)
(4) 10. 7829903 25-03-2009 मैसर्स अपेक्स इंक, गाला नं. 9 , प्लॉट सं. 29, पी. ऑफ कांजुर गाँव रोड, कांजुर मार्ग ( पूर्व ) , मुंबई -400083
11. 7830985 26-03-2011 कामा ज्वेलरी ( इंडिया ) प्रा. लि. 10 , विष्वेश्वर नगर, कुमसन मिल कंपाउंड, ऑफ आरे रोड , गोरेगांव ( पूर्व ) मुंबई -400063
12. 7811072 06-01-2011 पुजाज्वेलर्स, शॉप नं. 22 , श्री क्रिष्ण शारदा , टॉवर , लालचक्की चौक , उल्हासनगर, जिला ठाणे -421004
13. 7820881 17-02-2011 पलकज्वेलर्स , मुंबई-400002 शॉप नं. 1 , तल माला , अभिनंदन. मार्केट , कालबादेवी रोड,
10-01-2011
14. 7811880
लायनज्वेलर्स, 117, वसंत उद्योग भवन , सेनापती बापट मार्ग , लोअर परेल (पश्चिम) , मुंबई-400013 15. 7805077 12-12-2010 फोरम ज्वेलस्, प्रा. लि. 103/डी , सुखसागर हुजेस रोड , मुंबई-400007
09-03-2011
16, 7825790
मिनटेज 301-शिव शक्ति, एन. एस. रोड -10 , प्लॉट नं. 11 , जेव्हीपिडी स्किम, मुंबई-400049 17. 7812680 13-01-2011 शिल्पाज्वेलर्स , 64- ए, महावीर शॉपिंग सेंटर , आग्रा रोड, कल्याण पश्चिम , जिला ठाणे -421301 18. 7820780 17-02-2011 डाय मॅन एक्सपोर्ट्स प्रा. लि. प्रमोद इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , तीसरी मंजिल , कोहीनूर इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट के पीछे , ऑफ वेस्टर्न एक्सप्रेस हायवे , गोरेगाव पूर्व , मुंबई -400063
19. 7820982 17-02-2011 कॉनस्टार ज्वेलस्प्रा. लि. शॉप नं. 156 , पेहली मंजिल , अर्तिय-दि मिलिनीयम मॉल , डॉ. अॅनी बेसंत रोड , वरली , मुंबई-400018 20. 7816587 23-01-2011 तोहिद ज्वेलर्स शॉप नं. 7 , मुबिन अर्पाटमेंट, साउथ इंडियन बैंक , अमृत नगर मुंब्रा, ठाणे -400612 21. 7796409 12-11-2008 विनटेक्स फायर प्रोटेक्शन प्रा. लि. यूनिट नं. 1 , अशोक इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , एल. बी. एस. मार्ग , मुलूंड ( पश्चिम) , मुंबई -400080
4167
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
(5)
(6)
भा.मा. 2347 : 2006 घरगुती प्रेशर कुकर-विशिष्टि
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण /शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण /शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 10658 : 1999 अग्नि शमन के लिए उच्च धारिता के शुष्क रासायनिक पावडर ( ट्राली माउण्टेड) [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4168
(6)
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 22. 7823079 20-02-2011
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकंन
विष्णु सखाराम ज्वेलर्स , 230/36, आनंद निवास , जे एस. एस. रोड, गिरगाँव , मुंबई
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 23-01-2011
23. 7815989
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
ज्वेलेक्स इंटरनेशनल प्रा. लि. के सी हाउस , तल माला , प्लॉट नं. सीटिएस 15 -डी, सेंट्रल रोड , एम आय डि सी, अंधेरी ( पूर्व) , मुंबई-400093
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 18-11-2010
24. 7797613
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
बी. बी. जेम्स एन्ड ज्वेलस् प्रा. लि. 141 , जे पी रोड , एस पी चॉल , अंधेरी ( पश्चिम ) , मुंबई -400058
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 06-12-2010
25. 7802273
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
पुर्णिमा ज्वेलर्स , बाजार पेठ, महावीर प्रभु चौक, कल्याण ( पश्चिम ) , जिला ठाणे-421301
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 28-11-2010
26. 7800875
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
बी आर अकेरकर एण्ड सन्स ज्वेलर्स , शॉप नं. 180 , भिवंडीवाला बिल्डिंग , दत्ताराम लाड मार्ग , कालाचौकी, मुंबई-400033
भा.मा. 1417 1999 28-11-2010
27. 7800168
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
निरज ओर्नामेंट , शॉप नं. ।। , साईधाम बिल्डिंग , साईबाबा मंदिर रोड , साईबाबा नगर , बोरीवली ( पश्चिम ) , मुंबई-400092
भा.मा. 1417 1999 12-11-2010
28. 7796611
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी -शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
मिलेनियम, शॉप. नं. 5 , तल माला , 93/95 , गोल्डन प्लाजा , धानजी स्ट्रीट , मुंबई-400003
भा.मा. 13386 : 1992 11-02-2009
29. 7819391
50 लिटर धारिता के अग्नि शामक यांत्रिक फोम टाईप
जिओ फायर रेमेडीज प्रा. लि. , प्लॉट नं. एल-94 , एम. आय. डी.सी. , तलोजा, मुंबई -410208
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 30-01-2011
30. 7817690
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
गवरी ज्वेलर्स , 6/7 , रूपा को-ऑपरेटीव हाउसिंग सोसायटी , रिलायन्स वेब वर्ल्ड के सामने , एस.टी. स्टॉड रोड ,नालासो- पारा ( पश्चिम ) , ठाणे-401203
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 17-02-2011
31. 7821176
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भेरव जवेलर्स, जैन प्लाझा शिवाजी चौक, अंबरनाथ ( पूर्व ) , मुंबई-421501
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 32. 7800673 28-11-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
शा कपूरचंद सोनचंदजी एन्ड कम्पनी, 460 , न्यु मिल रोड , कुर्ला (पश्चिम) , मुंबई-400070
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 21-01-2011
33. 7815686
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
मंगलमनी ज्वेलर्स , शॉप नं. 22 , साईप्रसाद शॉपिंग कॉम्प्लेक्स, सेक्टर-8 , फेज-2 , नेरुल , मुंबई-400706 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
(2)
(3)
(4) (1)
34. 7808487 23-12-2010 चारभुजा ज्वेलर्स , शॉप नं. 5 , रेलवे फाटक के सामने , बाजार रोड , विरार (पूर्व) ठाणे-401303 35. 7827693 17-03-2009 मैसर्स असोसिएटैड ट्रांसरेल स्ट्रक्चर्स लि. , सर्वे नं. 178 से 182 , डुंगरीपाडा, अंबोली गाँव , खेर्डि- सुर्नागी रोड , दादरा एन्ड नगर हवेली , सलिवासा-396230 36. 7800471 28-11-2010 दिपा जवेलर्स, शॉप नं. 4/साई छाया सोसायटी , कोकण नगर जे . एम. रोड , हनुमान मंदिर के सामने , भांडुप (पश्चिम) मुंबई-400078 37. 7795508 07-11-2010 पुष्पराज ज्वेलर्स , गुजरात भवन , विष्णु मंदिर के सामने , बाझारपेठ , कल्याण , ( पश्चिम) ठाणे-421301 38. 7798514 22-11-2010 चैन प्लस , 109 , धानजी स्ट्रीट , शॉप नं. 2 , तल माला , मुंबई -400003 39. 7808285 23-12-2010 सिंदुरी ज्वेलर्स, शॉप नं. 9 , लक्ष्मीनारायण शॉपिंग सेंटर, परनाका, भिवंडी, मुंबई-421302 40. 7813884 15-01-2011 सौशिश डायमंडस् लि. (ज्वेलरी डिविजन) , शॉप नं. 3 , गॅलेरिया, हिरानंदिनी गार्डन , पवई , मुंबई -400076
41. 7813985 15-01-2011 संजय दत्तात्रय दांडेकर ज्वेलर्स, सोनार अली , खेड, रतनगिरी -415709 42. 7802576 06-12-2010 कांचन ज्वेलर्स, पेठ , कल्याण ( पश्चिम ) , ठाणे -421301 रतन भुवन , गांधी चौक , बाजार
43. 7808588 23-12-2010 व्हाय जी पेंडुरकर एन्ड कं. , 19-20 , गंगाधर निवास , गोखले रोड नॉर्थ , दादर ( पश्चिम ) , मुंबई-400028 44. 7799415 26-11-2010 नयाब ज्वेलर्स , दुसरा माला, 898-नोटन प्लाजा, टर्नर रोड बांद्रा ( पश्चिम) , मुंबई-400050 45. 7807889 23-12-2010 प्रकाशचंद हिराचंद , बाझारपेठ , गांधी चौक , कल्याण , (पश्चिम) , ठाणे-421301
4169.
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
(5)
(6)
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 398 : 1996 (भाग 2)
शिरोपरि प्रेषण प्रयोजन हेतु अल्यु- मिनियम चालक अल्युमिनियम चालक : भाग 2 जस्तिकृत इस्पात प्रबलित
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन [PART 11 SEC. 3 (ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4170
(6)
(5)
(3)
(4)
( 1) ( 2)
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 46. 7815585 21-01-2011
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
मयुरा ज्वेलर्स , 1 , गाहलोट कॉम्प्लेक्स, सहकार बाजार नजदीक , प्लॉट नं. 28 - ए, सेक्टर -10 , एफ- II , नेरुल ( पश्चिम ) , मुंबई-400706
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 31-01-2011
47. 7818389
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
डॉ. विद्याधर गोपाल ओके ज्वेलर्स प्रा. लि. , शॉप नं. 1 , समर कास्टल , कास्टल मिल नाका , एल.बी.एस. मार्ग , ठाणे ( पश्चिम ) , ठाणे -400601
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 48. 7808689 26-12-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण /शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
अंबुलाल मोतीराम एन्ड सन्स ज्वेलर्स, 2, सुनिता, कोलाबा पोस्ट आफिस के सामने , कोलाबा , मुंबई -400005
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 49. 7808891 26-12-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
नरेन कुमार ज्वेलर्स, 22, उपवन क्विन्स पार्क , रेमंड. शोरूम नजदीक , मिरा - भाईंदर रोड , मिरा रोड ( पूर्व ) , ठाणे -401107
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 50. 7800774 28-11-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
एस.वी. फणसगावकर ज्वेलर्स, 12 , माधव भुवन , जहागीर मेरवानजी स्ट्रीट , परेल, मुंबई-400012
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 06-11-2010
51. 7794910
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
बी. टी. परमार , 546 , कामिनी वाडी, चिरा बाजार , मुंबई -400002
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 20-01-2011
52. 7814987
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
श्री आनंद ज्वेलर्स , शॉप नं. 2 , हरी हरेश्वर देवाली ट्रस्ट, पापडी नाका, बसई (पश्चिम) , ठाणे-401202
53. 7827592 17-03-2009
भा.मा. 398 : भाग । : 1996
शिरोपरि प्रेषण प्रयोजन हेतु अल्युमिनियम चालक अल्युमिनियम चालकः भाग । जस्तिकृत इस्पात प्रबलित
मैसर्स असोसिएटेड ट्रासरेल स्ट्रक्चर्स लि. , सर्व्हे नं. 178 से 182 , डुंगरीपाडा गाँव , अंबोली , खेडी- सुरंगी रोड, दादरा एन्ड नगर हवेली , सिलवासा
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 23-12-2010
54. 7807990
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
संगिता ज्वेलर्स, शॉप नं. 10 , श्यामकमल बिल्डिंग अग्रवाल मार्केट , विले पार्ले ( पूर्व ) , मुंबई-400057
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 26-02-2011
55. 7824081
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
मानसी ज्वेलर्स , शॉप नं. 1 , केशव भवन , शिव सेना कार्यालय के नजदीक , एम. जी. रोड, मुलुंड ( पश्चिम ) मुंबई-400080
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 56. 7802677 06-12-2010 पुनम ज्वेलर्स , बाजार पेठ , महावीर प्रभु चौक, कल्याण ( पश्चिम ) , ठाणे -421301
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 57. 7808184 23-12-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
दिनेश ज्वेलर्स , 3 , दर्शन अर्पाटमेंट , इरानी रोड , डहाणु रोड , ठाणे -401602 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
(1) (2)
(3)
(4) 58. 7815484 21-01-2011 शुभम ज्वेलर्स , शॉप नं. 13 , मिनाक्षी टॉवर , प्लॉट नं. -68, सेक्टर -16 , नेरुल , नवी मुंबई -400706 59. 7799617 26-11-2010 जी. वी. सन्स, शॉप नं . 8 , जलाराम नगर नं. 3 , वल्लभ बाग लेन , घाटकोपर ( पूर्व ) , मुंबई-400077 60. 7796308 12-11-2008 मुकेश मेटल इंडस्ट्रिज , 105 , समयक , सागर प्लाझा इंडस्ट्रियल कॉम्पलेक्स, वसई सावित्री रोड, वसई ( पूर्व ) ठाणे -401208 61. 7795609 07-11-2010 मेघा ज्वेलर्स , शॉप नं. 6 , जलाराम को- ऑ. हा. सो. , जलाराम नगर , एमजी रोड , घटकोपर ( पूर्व ) , मुंबई -400077
62. 7812478 13-01-2011 मुकुंद आत्माराम पालशेटकर अॅन्ड सन्स ज्वेलर्स , 94/96 , डॉ. बी. जे. मार्ग, ठाकुरद्वार , मुंबई -400002
23-01-2011
63. 7816183
आरती ज्वेलर्स प्रा. लि. , होरमुझ मॅनशन , ब्रेक कॅन्डी ,. 72 , भुलाभाई देसाई रोड , मुंबई-400026 64. 7801776 05-12-2010 मेघा ज्वेलर्स , शॉप नं. 6 , झवेर आरकंड , झवेर रोड , मुलूंड ( पश्चिम ) , मुंबई-400080 65. 7812579 13-01-2011 स्वर्ण पॅलेस ज्वेलर्स , शॉप नं. । , खिमजी महाराज बिल्डिंग , एम.जी. रोड , मुलूंड (पश्चिम ) , मुंबई-400080 06-01-2011
66. 7810575
श्री महावीरज्वेलर्स , 2, सपना को-ऑप. हाउंसिंग सोसायटी लि. , एल.बी.एस. मार्ग घटकोपर ( पश्चिम ) , मुंबई -400086
67. 7819492 11-02-2009 जिओ फायर रेमेडीज प्रा. लि. , प्लॉट नं. एल.- 94 , एम. आई. डी.सी. , तलोजा, नवी मुंबई , मुंबई-410208 68. 7813480 16-01-2011 सेन्टीमेन्टस्, 86-87 , अशोका शॉपिंग सेंटर , दूसरा माला , एल.टी. मार्ग , जी. टी. हॉस्पिटल कॉम्प्लेक्स, मुंबई-400001 69. 7825083 03-03-2011 मयुरा ज्वेलर्स , शॉप नं. 3 , डॉ. माथ अपार्टमेंट, आगाशी रोड , विरार ( पश्चिम) , ठाणे -401303
4171
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
(5)
(6)
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 2112 : 2003 चांदी और चांदी मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण /शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा. मा. 7231 : 1994 अंग्रेजी शौचालयों तथा मूत्रालयों के लिए प्लास्टिक की प्रधावन टंकियोंकी विशिष्टी
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 2112 : 2003 चांदी और चांदी मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-शुध्दता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 10658 : 1999 शुष्क पावडर वाले उच्च क्षमता के अग्नि शामक ( ट्रॉली स्थापक) की विशिष्टी
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धतां व मुहरांकन [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 4172
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
(6)
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 17-02-2011
70. 7821075
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
कांती ज्वेलर्स , गीत गंगा बिल्डिंग , शॉप नं. 1 , बी. पी . एल. गॅलेरी के सामने , ठाणे -400602
भा.मा. 2878 : 2004 18-02-2009
71. 7821984
सुवाहय अग्नि शामक कार्बन डाइऑक्साइड टाइप ( सुवाहय व ट्राली माउण्टेड)
जिओ फायर रेमेडीज प्रा. लि. , प्लॉट नं. एल-94 , एम. आई. डी.सी. , तलोजा, नवी मुंबई , मुंबई-410208
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 26-03-2011
72. 7830884
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
कल्पतरू जवेलर्स , 78 , विठ्ठलवाडी, पहला माला, शॉप नं. 10 , नवीनचंद्र बिल्डिंग , कालबादेवी रोड , मुंबई -400002
भा.मा. 4308 : 2003 19-02-2009
73. 7822784
बी और सी क्लास अग्नि शमन के लिए शुष्क रसायनिक पावडर
हेमरत्न सेफ्टी इंडस्ट्रिज, रचना इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , डॉ. पाटिल कंपाउंड , चंदनसर, कोपरी , विरार ( पूर्व ) , मुंबई-401303
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 31-10-2010
74. 7793201
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
बालाजी गोल्ड , 13 , मोरया शॉपिंग सेंटर , ऐरोली, नवी मुंबई -400708
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 12-12-2010
75. 7804984
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
महावीर ज्वेलर्स , 218-ए, एम. एन. नगर , कोक्री आगार , अॅन्टॉप हिल , मुंबई -400037
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 76. 7807788 23-12-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुध्दता व मुहरांकन
पुखराज भगवानजी एन्ड कं. , बाजार पेठ , गांधी चौक , कल्याण (पश्चिम) ठाणे-421301
भा.मा. 1417 1999 09-03-2011
77. 7825689
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
उत्सव ज्वेलर्स , एफ-5/20 , शांतिवन सोसायटी , सेक्टर नं. 6 , सी. बी. डी. , बेलापुर , ठाणे -400614
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 06-01-2011
78. 7810878
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण /शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
दीपक गोल्ड ज्वेलर्स , 514/516 , जे . एस.एस. रोड , चिराबाजार , मुंबई-400002
भा.मा. 3589 : 2001 17-12-208
79. 7805481
पानी और मल जल के लिए इस्पात पाईप , 158.3 से 2540 मिमी , बाहरी व्यास , विशिष्टि
प्रतिभा इंडस्ट्रिज लि. , प्लॉट नं. 215 , विजयपुर , पी.ओ. कॉन , भिवंडी- वाडा रोड , तालुका वाडा, जिला-421303
09-02-2009
80. 7822683
भा.मा. 14927 भाग 2: 2001
विद्युत संस्थापन के लिए केबल तनाव व वाहिनी पद्धती भाग-2 केबल तनाव एवं वाहिनी पद्धती दीवारों पर या सीलींग परं लगाने के लिए वांछित
स्वागतम प्लास्टिक्स, गाला नं. 4 , दमन इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , डेक्कन कॅन्स के नजदीक , जीडीआईडी सी, दाभेल , दमन -396210
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 16-01-2011
81. 7814280
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
क्लासिक डायमंडस् ( इंडिया ) लि. , ई-5 , प्लॉट नं. 15 , वायसेल एफ-11 और एफ-12 , एम. आई. डी. सी. , मरोल , अंधेरी ( पूर्व ) , मुंबई-400093 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
(1) ( 2)
(3)
(4) 82. 7798918 22-11-2010 एम एस एन ज्वेलर्स, 4/बी, मेफेअर , 26 , एस. व्ही. रोड , सिद्धार्थ होटल के सामने , बांद्रा ( पश्चिम ) , मुंबई-400050
83. 7802172 06-12-2010 प्रथमेश ज्वेलर्स, 10 , मुकुंद निवास , मानपाडा रोड, डोबिवली ( पूर्व ) , ठाणे -421201
84. 7808790, 25-12-2010 शुभम ज्वेलर्स , शॉप नं. 65 , गॅलेरिया, हिरानंदनी , पवई , मुंबई -400076 85. 7800067 28-11-2010 गिफ्ट गोल्ड, 187/193 , कपाडिया बिल्डिंग , पहला माला , जवेरी बाजार , मुंबई-400002 86. 7816688 23-01-2011 काचाज्वेलर्स, 97-101, मुंबादेवी चेंबर्स , चौथा माला , शॉप नं. 60 , जवेरी बाजार , मुंबई -400002
87. 7817589 30-01-2011 ट्रेझरर्स, 1 / , धरम पॅलेस , हुजेस रोड, एन. एस. पाटकर मार्ग , मुंबई-400007 88. 7802071 06-12-2010 इनस्टाइल जवेलरी , प्लॉट नं. 15 , फेज- II , स्ट्रीट नं. 10 , होटल तुंगा पेराडाइज के पीछे , एम आई डी सी , अंधेरी ( पूर्व ) , मुंबई-400093
89. 7814078 13-01-2011 जेम इम्पेक्स , 103 , रुप राज , 497 , एस व्ही पीरोड, मुंबई -400004 90. 7803275 09-12-2010 स्वर्णमाला ज्वेलर्स , 7 , गुरुनानक इस्टेट , एम. जी. रोड, मुलुंड ( पश्चिम ) , मुंबई-400080 91. 7827794 17-03-2011 चिंतामणी ज्वेलर्स , 2, सरस्वती अपार्टमेंट , आई हॉस्पिटल के सामने , शंकरराव चौक, कल्याण ( पश्चिम ) , मुंबई-421301 92. 7800572 28-11-2010 मुन जेम्स, 303 , पंचरत्ना , ओपेरा हाउस , मुंबई-400004 93. 7799718 26-11-2010 अरहम डायमंड ज्वेलरी प्रा. लि. , 6 , संभव दर्शन , पहला माला , 226, राजा जाम मोहन रॉय रोड, गिरगाँव चर्च , मुंबई-400004 2745 G1/08-16
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
4173 (5)
(6)
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 आभूषण /शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन 4174
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
(2)
(3)
(1)
(4) 94. 7810474 06-01-2011 कॅलेक्स कॉरर्पोरेशन , बी-107 , धरम पॅलेस , एन एस पाटकर मार्ग , गामदेवी , मुंबई-400007
95. 7836795 14-04-2009 एमआरएफ लि. , पी. बी. नं. 1 , उत्तर गोवा, गोवा-403401
96. 7798009 19-11-2010 एम. जे. ज्वेलर्स, शॉप नं. 4 , चिंतामणीअर्पाटमेंट्स , शंकर लेन गार्डन , एस व्ही पी रोड , कांदिवली ( पश्चिम) , मुंबई-400067
97. 7810777 06-01-2011 मयुर ज्वेलर्स, 571 , जे.एस.एस. रोड, चिराबाझार , मुंबई-400002 10-01-2011
98. 7812175
मनीज्वेलर्स, ए/34, नंदभुवन इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, महाकाली गुफा रोड, अंधेरी ( पूर्व ) , मुंबई -400093 99. 7811173 07-01-2011 ओम श्री गजानन ज्वेलर्स , राम अपार्टमेंट , काटेमानीवली नाका, कल्याण ( पश्चिम ) , मुंबई-421306
100. 7810373 02-01-2011 विजय सेंटर ज्वेलर्स, 312 , गोल्डन प्लाझा , तीसरा माला , 97/99 , धानजी स्ट्रीट , मुंबई-400003
101. 7804782 11-12-2010 मंगल इंटरप्रायझेस , 105- बी , गोकुल आर्केड, स्वामी , नित्यानंद मार्ग , विले पार्ले ( पूर्व ) , मुंबई-400057 .
102. 7813783 15-01-2011 केवलराम घनश्यामदास पोपली अॅन्ड सन्सज्वेलर्स , पंचरत्न बिल्डिंग , 56/57 , तल मांला, ओपेरा हाउस , मुंबई-400004
103. 7807586 23-12-2010 मयुर ज्वेलर्स , 196 , कालु भुवन बिल्डिंग , एल. जे. रोड , माहिम, मुंबई-400016
104. 7801675 04-12-2010 सामा ज्वेलरी प्रा. लि. , 313 , वसन उद्योग भवन , ऑफ सेनापती बापट मार्ग , लोअर परेल , मुंबई-400013
105. 7802475 06-12-2010
बाझारपेठ , गांधी चौक , कल्याण (पश्चिम ) , मुंबई-421301 दलीचंद चिमनजी ज्वेलर्स,
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
(6)
(5)
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 15636 : 2005 स्वचल वाहन - व्यावसायिक वाहनों के लिए वातिल टायर- आडी और रेथ्डयल प्लाई-विशिष्टि
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण /शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण /शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
(1) (2)
(3)
(4) 106. 7798817 22-11-2010 अलंकार सोनी मनीलाल अॅन्ड ब्रोज , शॉप नं. 6 , सावनी अपार्टमेंट्स , राजवाडी , एम.जी. रोड, घाटकोपर (पूर्व ), मुंबई-400077 107. 7803578 09-12-2010 धरमचंद पारसचंद अॅन्ड कंपनी , ए-42 , नंदकिशोर इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , ऑफ. महाकाली गुंफा रोड, पेपर बॉक्स कंपनी नजदीक, अंधेरी (पूर्व) , मुंबई-400093 108. 7799516 26-11-2010 जी. बी. सन्स, शॉप पं. 8 , जलाराम नगर नं. 3 , वल्लभ बौग लाने , घाटकोपर (पूर्व ) , मुंबई -400077 109. 7808992 26-12-2010 किशोर ज्वेलर्स , शिव मार्केट रोउ , डी.एम.सी. रोड, अंबरनाथ ( पश्चिम) , ठाणे-421501
110. 7809186 26-12-2010 एन. भाउ ( ज्वेलर्स ) प्रा. लि. , 436 , डॉ. दादासाहेब भाडकमकर मार्ग , लेमिंगशन रोड, मुंबई-400004
111. 7826893 13-03-2011 फाल्गुनी ज्वेलर्स, गोल्डसिल्वर बुलियन , शॉप नं. 2 , प्रथमेश प्लाझा , नॅचुरल आईसक्रिम नजदीक, आगाशी रोड, विरार ( पश्चिम ) , ठाणे-401303
112. 7824586 02-03-2011 अरून्स मानकामे अॅन्ड सन्स, शिवाजी चौक , कॅनरा बैंक के सामने , जैन प्लाझा , अंबरनाथ (पूर्व) , ठाणे
113. 7817791 30-01-2011 विशाद ज्वेलर्स प्रा. लि. , 13-विकाश पॅराडाइज , भक्ती मार्ग, ऑफ एल. एस. मार्ग , मुलुंड ( पश्चिम ) , मुंबई-400080 114. 7828089 18-03-2009 किश्को लि. प्लॉट नं. E 19/B & C , एम आय डी सी, सिनर इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , सिनर , ठाणे मालेगांव , नासिक -422113 115. 7804479 11-12-2010 पी अॅन्ड एस ज्वेलरी लि. , सकिना मंजिल नं. 2 , चौथा माला , राजा राम मोहन रॉय रोड, न्यु चर्नी रोड, मुंबई -400004 116. 7799819 26-11-2010 देवी ज्वेलर्स , शॉप नं. । , निलयोग अपार्टमेंट , एम. जी. क्रॉस रोड नं. 4 , पटेल नगर , कृष्णा नगर , कांदिवली (पश्चिम) , मुंबई -400067
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
4175 (5)
(6)
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण /शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 2112 : 2003 चॉर्दी और चॉर्दी मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1660 भाग ।: 1982
पिटवां अल्युमिनियम के कुकिंग टेबल , सर्विग , भंडारण व बैकिंग के बर्तन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन [ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4176
(6)
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1 )
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 23-03-2011
117. 7828897
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण /शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
वेर्लेकर ज्वेलर्स, c/ o उल्हास ज्वेलर्स प्रा. लि. मुनसिपालटी के नजदीक , न्यु मार्केट , पोस्ट बॉक्स नं. 73 , उत्तर गोवा, मार्गोवा-403601
09-12-2008
118. 7803073
भा.मा. 9537 भाग 3 : 1983
विद्युत संस्थानों के लिए नलिकाएँ भाग 3 विद्युतरोधी सामग्री के दृढ़ सादी नलिकाएँ
त्रिकाया प्लास्टो इंडस्ट्रिज , 189/(4 ) , पांचाल उद्योग नगर, भिमपोर , दमन-396210
भा.मा. 5504 : 1997
सर्पिल वैल्डित पाइप्स विशिष्टि
17-12-2008
119. 7805582
प्रतिभा इंडस्ट्रिज लि. श्रीकांत चेंबर्स, फेज- II , पांचवा माला , सायन- ट्रॉबे रोड, चेंबुर, मुंबई -400071
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 120. 7807485 26-12-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्पेक्ट्रम ज्वेलरी प्रा. लि. , तल माला, ( भाग ) , प्रिंस आर्केड के पीछे , C - 10 , सेंट्रल रोड , मरोल , एम आय डी सी , अंधेरी ( पूर्व ) , मुंबई-400093
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 11-12-2010
121. 7804883
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
मिराह जेवेल्स , प्लॉट नं. 87 , स्ट्रीट नं. 15 , एम.आय.डी.सी. , अंधेरी ( पूर्व ) , मुंबई-400093
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 122. 7808083 23-12-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
एल. सुंदरदास झवेरी , 4, धरम पैलेस , ह्युजेस रोड, मुंबई-400007
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 123. 7801574 04-12-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
ओम ज्वेलर्स, भिकोबा निवास , गोखले रोड (उत्तर ) , दादर ( पश्चिम ) , मुंबई-400028
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 28-11-2010
124. 7799920
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण /शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
मिलाप गोल्ड , शॉप नं. 4 , मनीष अपार्टमेंट , माथुरदास रोड, कांदिवली (पश्चिम) , मुंबई-400067
भा.मा. 13386 : 1992 12-11-2008
125. 7796510
50 लिटर धारिता के अग्नि शामक यांत्रिक फोम टाईप
विनटेक्स फायर प्रोटेक्शन प्रा. लि. , युनिट नं. । , अशोक इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, एल.बी.एस. मार्ग , मुलूंड ( पश्चिम) , मुंबई-400080
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 16-01-2011
126. 7813581
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
स्टार जेम्स, शॉप नं. 12 , न्यु जलदर्शन , तल माला, 288 चिंबई रोड, पेरीं क्रॉस रोड के सामने , पिंकी वाईन्स नजदीक बांद्रा , मुंबई -400050
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 09-12-2010
127. 7803174
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
प्रशांत ज्वेलर्स , 4, गोविन्द कुंज , जे . एन. रोड , मुलूंड (पश्चिम) , मुंबई-400080
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 06-01-2011
128. 7810676
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
कास डिझाईन , 224 , दुसरा माला , कामा इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, 8 एस बी रोड , लोअर परेल , मुंबई -400013 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
(1) (2)
(3)
(4) 129. 7794708 06-11-2010 एस. के . शाह अॅन्ड सन्स, 500/502 , जे.एस.एस. रोड , चिराबाझार, मुंबई -400002 130. 7801877 06-12-2010 श्रेनुज अॅन्ड कंपनी प्रा. लि. , 21 , पाठे बापुराव मार्ग , डायना टॉकीज लेन , तारदेव , मुंबई-400034 131. 7798615 22-11-2010 सफारी जेम्स ( ज्वेलर्स ) , बॉम्बे बाजार , स्टेशन रोड, चेपल लेन, सांताक्रुज ( पश्चिम) , मुंबई -400054 132. 7826085 11-03-2009 गोयल अलाईड स्टील प्रा. लि. , 58/1 , पी टी वासुरी खुर्द, ता. वाडा, ठाणे-421303 133. 7824283 28-02-2011 दत्तात्रय अॅन्ड सन्स, प्रभु आशीष , राम मंदिर रोड , विले पार्ले ( पूर्व ) , मुंबई-400057 134. 7821378 17-12-2011 कांचन ज्वेलर्स, शॉप नं. 3 , मोती विल्ला, ठाणे ( पूर्व )
135. 7821277 17-02-2011 संजोलीज्वेलर्स, शॉप नं. 9 , तुलसी महाल ( E ) , तलव रोड, भायंदर ( पूर्व) , मुंबई-401105 136. 7797815 18-11-2010 मिथाली गोल्ड, 11 , महावीर भक्ती, डी मार्ट, सेक्टर 15 , कापरखाइ राणे , नवी मुंबई , ठाणे -400709 137. 7791904 31-10-2010 एन. के. जे. जेम्स अॅन्ड ज्वेर्ल्स प्रा. लि. , 1/1705 , चॅलेंजर , ठाकुर विलेज , कांदिवली ( पूर्व ) , मुंबई -400101 138. 7817892 31-01-2009 मोनोटोना टायर्स लि. गेट नं. 279 , 286 , 287 ( P ) , डाकिवली विलेज , भिवंडी वाडा रोड, तानसा नदी के नजदीक , ता. वाडा, ठाणे 139. 7828392 23-03-2009 मैसर्स सावित्री स्टील्स इंडस्ट्रीज , डी-12 , मडकैम इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , मडकैम , उत्तर गोवा-403404 140. 7803679 10-12-2010 ज्वेलर्स शांतिलाल अॅन्ड सन्स , 1/5; रजदा बिल्डिंग , दूसरा माला , खोली नं. 7 , सेंकड एक्स, ओल्ड हनुमान लेन , मुंबई -400002
4177
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
(5)
(6)
भा.मा. 1417 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1786 1985 कंक्रीट प्रबलन के लिए उच्च सान्द्रन इस्पात सरिये और तार कीविशिष्टि
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 15627 : 2005 स्वचल वाहन - मोटर टू और थ्री व्हीलर मोटर वाहनों के लिए वातिल टायर-विशिष्टि
भा.मा. 1786 1985 कंक्रीट प्रबलन के लिए उच्च सान्द्रन इस्पात संरिये और तार कीविशिष्टि
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन 4178
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
(6)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1) ( 2)
09-12-2010
141. 7803477
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
फेशन ज्वेलरी प्रा. लि. 118 , कंसारा चॉल , पहला माला कार्यालय संख्या 13/14 , कॉटन एक्सचेंज बिल्डिंग के नजदीक , कालबादेवी रोड , मुंबई-400002
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 142. 7826792 13-03-2011
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
फाल्गुन ज्वेलर्स , गोल्ड सिल्वर बुलियन , शॉप नं. 2 , प्रथमेश प्लाझा , नॅचुरल आईसक्रीम नजदीक , आगाशी रोड , विहार ( पश्चिम ) , ठाणे-401303
143. 7802778
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 06-12-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
यशवंत पोतदार ज्वेलर्स , शॉप नं. 2 , शिवमती को-ऑप. हाउसिंग सोसायटी , उत्तन रोड , गोपीका टॉकीज के नजदीक, भाईंदर ( पश्चिम ) , ठाणे -401101
16-01-2011
144. 7814179
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
कलश ज्वेलर्स, शॉप नं. 5 अॅन्ड 6 , जलाराम इस्टेट्स, एम.जी. रोड, मुलूंड (पश्चिम) , ठाणे -400080
31-01-2011
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 145. 7818288
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
आदित्य दि ज्वेलरी वर्ल्ड , 7, सुयोजीत अवधूत टॉवर ,. पुराना गंगापुर नाका, गंगापुर रोड, नासिक, मुंबई -422005
146. 7822885
भा.मा. 14609 : 1999 19-02-2009
ए.बी.सी. वर्ग के आग बुझाने के लिए शुष्क रासायनिक पावडर- विशिष्टि
हेमरत्ना सेफ्टी इंडस्ट्रीज , रचना इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , डॉ पाटिल कंपाउंड, चंदनसर कोपरी , विरार ( पूर्व ) , मुंबई-401303
147. 7815383
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 21-01-2011
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
एसएचएल जेम्स ज्वेलरी लि. , 4- ए-12 , सोना उद्योग इंडस्ट्रियल. इस्टेट , पारसी पंचायत रोड, अंधेरी ( पूर्व ) , मुंबई-400069
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 148. 7795104 06-11-2010
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
विधाता ज्वेलर्स , 9 , ग्राम पंचायत रोड , गोरेगॉव. (पश्चिम) , मुंबई -400062
149. 7812781
भा.मा. 12818 : 1992 15-01-2009
बोर- नलकूपों के लिए अनम्यकृत पी.वी.सी. जाली और आवरक पाइप-विशिष्ट
पॉलिसिल पाईप , सर्वे नं. 103/1/2 , राखोली इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , राखोली गाँव , दादरा अॅन्ड नगर हवेली , सिल्व्हासा-396230
150. 7825992 09-03-2011
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन.
आदिनाथ जेम्स अॅन्ड ज्वेलर्स प्रा. लि. , 202/2बी, क्विन्स्डायमंड , ओपेरा हाउस , चर्नी रोड, मुंबई-400004
151. 7812276 13-01-2011
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 नैनराज एंटरप्राइजेज प्रा. लि. , 325 , अंबा. सदन , लिंकिंग रोड,. खार (पश्चिम ) , मुंबई-400052
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
(1 ) ( 2)
(3)
(4) 152. 7795003 06-11-2010 सुषमा ज्वेलरी , 1/ए, रुबी चेबर , 40/42, धानजी स्ट्रीट , मुंबई-400003
153. 7794809 25-11-2010 मंगलम ज्वेलर्स , सर्वे नं. 11 , सेक्टर-1 , सी. बी.. डी. बेलापुर , ठाणे-400614 154. 7809085 25-12-2010 शांतिलाल शोभावत अॅन्ड सन्स, शॉप नं. 3 , कमल निवास, एन सी केलकर रोड , दादर पश्चिम , मुंबई-400028 155. 7816082 23-01-2011 आरती ज्वेलर्स प्रा. लि. , हॉरमुज मॅमशन , ब्रीच कॅन्डी , 72 , भुलाभाई देसाई रोड , मुंबई-400016 156. 7807687 23-01-2011 एम. एम. आर्ट ज्वेलर्स, 8 बी/9 , रुतनमल महाल , प्लॉट नं. 38 , एल. जे. रोड, माहिम , मुंबई-400016 157. 7827087 16-03-2011 ए इ मोतीवाला , सर जे जे रोड , शॉप नं. 2 , फॉरचुन टॉवर , अॅडिशनल कमिशनर ऑफ पोलिस ऑफिस, नर हुमे हाय स्कूल , भायखला मुंबई-400008 158. 7813682 15-01-2011 श्रीनाथ ज्वेलर्स , प्लॉट नं. बी-12 , दुसरा माला, इंद्रपंस्थ शॉपिंग सेंटर, एस व्ही रोड, बोरिवली पश्चिम, मुंबई -400092 159. 7803376 10-12-2010
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
4179 (5)
(6)
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 व मुहरांकन स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता
भा.मा. 1417 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 आभूषण /शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 1999
आर व्ही ज्वेलर्स,
144-शेख मेनन स्ट्रीट ,
मुंबई-400002
160. 7813379 16-01-2011 विरहेम एक्सपोटर्स 5 , स्वीकर 72 , वल्लभभाई रोड, विले पार्ले, मुंबई -400056 161. 7815282 20-01-2011 सैतवडेकर ज्वेलर्स, शॉप नं. 2 , पदमा टॉकिज बिल्डिंग , तल माला , बाजार पेठ, चिपलुन , रत्नागिरी -415605
162. 7810979 06-01-2011
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन
भा.मा. 1417 : 1999
नक्शकलेक्शन,
321 , पंचरत्न , ओपेरा हाउस ,
मुंबई-400004
स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के व मुहरांकन आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता
[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ] पी. के. गम्भीर, उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4180
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) |
New Delhi , the 25th July, 2008
S.O. 2061. In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 6 ) of regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulations , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given below in the following schedule: 1 Nov. 2007 to 31 Mar. 2008
SCHEDULE
Validity Date
Sl No.
Licence No.
Name and Address (factory) of the Party
(4)
(3)
(1) (2)
23-12-2010
1. 7807384
Vara Jewels 1804 , Panchratna, Opera HouseMumbai -400004
22-11-2010
2. 7798716
Prakash Jewellers & Co.Shop No. 1 , Ellora-Building, Kurla Road, Santacruz East Mumbai -400029
13-01-2011
3. 7812377
Design Creation 16/17 , Ravi Indl . Estate, 25 Mahal Indl Estate , Off Mahakali Caves Road , Andheri EastMumbai - 400093 23-12-2010
4. 7808386
Vaishali Jewellers 6 , Abdul Rehman Bulding , Opp . Plaza Cinema . Near Shivaji Mandir . NC Kelkar Road , DadarWest Mumbai -400028
23/03/2011
5. 7828594
ShreeJewellers 36/37, Sidhivinayak Apt., Gali No. 3 Bhazi Market, Thangeali Bhiwandi Dist : Thane- 421302
23-03-2011
6: 7828796
Shree Neminath Jewellers Shop No. 02, Mehta Mandir , Opp.B.P.T. Colony, 146, Worli Village Mumbai -400030 23-03-2011
7. 7828695
Renuka's Impex 104 , Dharam Palace , 100/103 , Hughes Road, Opera House Mumbai -400007
8. 7809489 25-12-2010
Kanakratka Exim Pvt . Ltd. 271/273 , Mumbadevi Road,, Opp . Mumbadevi Temple , Ground Floor , Zaveri Bazar , Mumbai-400002 07-02-2011
9. 7818995
Chandrakant Vasant Saitawadekar Jewellers Sidhi Saraswati , Sonarali Hutatma Kanhere Chowk, Timbatti Naka , Khed Ratnagiri 415709
25-03-2009
10. 7829903
M/s. Apex Inc Gala No. 9 , Plot No. 29 P. Off Kanjur Village Road , Kanjurmarg ( E) Mumbai -400042 26-03-2011
11. 7830985
Kama Jewellery ( India) Pvt . Ltd. 10th Vishweshwar Nagar, Kumson MillCompound, Off Areay Road, Goregaon East Mumbai -400063
06-01-2011
12. 7811072
Pooja Jewellers Shop No. 22, Shree Krishna Sharda Tower , Lalchakki Chowk Ulhasnagar Dist: Thane -421004 Product
IS No./Part/Scc Year
(6)
(5)
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness andMarking - Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts - Fineness andMarking -Specification
IS 1417:
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery /Artefacts - Fineness andMarking -Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness andMarking -Specification
IS 1417:
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking - Specification
IS 1417: 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness 1999 and Marking- Specification
IS2347:
2006 Domestic Pressure Cookers- Specification
IS 1417 :
1999 GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery /Artefacts- Fineness and Marking -Specification
IS 1417:
1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking -Specification [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
(2)
( 1)
(3)
(4) 13. 7820881 17-02-2011
Palak Jewellers Shop No. 1 , GR . Floor , Abhinandan Market , Kalbadevi Road Mumbai 400002
14. 7811880 10-1-2011
Lion Jewellers 117 , Vasant Udyog Bhavan , Senapati Bapat Marg Lower Parel West Mumbai -400013
15. 7805077 12-12-2010
4181
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
(5)
(6)
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Phorum Jewels Pvt . Ltd. 103/D,
Sukhsagar Hughes Road
Mumbai-400007
16. 7825790 09-03-2011
Mintage 301 - Shiv Shakti , N.S. Road- 10 , Plot No. 11 , JVPD Scheme Mumbai -400049 17. 7812680 13-01-2011
Shilpa Jewellers 64 - AMahavir Shopping Centre, Agra Road Kalyan West Dist: Thane- 421301
18. 7820780 17-02-2011
DiaManExports Pvt. Ltd. Pramod Indl . Estate , 3rd Floor , Behind Kohinoor Indl Estate , Off Western Express , Highway Goregaon East , Mumbai-400063 19. 7820982 17-02-2011
Constar Jewels Pvt. Ltd. Shop No. 156 , 1st Floor, Artia-the Milleniun Mall , Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli Mumbai-400018 20. 7816587 23-01-2011
Toheed Jewellers Shop No. 7, MubinApartment, Opp . South Indian Bank, Amrut Nagar Mumbra Dist: Thane -400612
21. 7796409 12-11-2008
Vintex Fire Protection Pvt . Ltd. UnitNo. 1 , Ashok Indl . Estate , L.B.S. Marg , Mulund(W) Mumbai -400080 22. 7823079 20-02-2011
Vishnu Sakharam Jewellers 230/36 , Anand Niwas , J.S. S. Road , Girgaon , Mumbai 23. 7815989 23-01-2011
Jewelex International Pvt . Ltd. KC House ,Ground Floor, Plot CTS , 15 - D Central Road, Midc , Andheri East Mumbai -400093
24. 7797613 18-11-2010
B.B.Gems and Jewels Pvt. Ltd 141 , J.P. Road , S.P. Chawal Andheri West Mumbai -400058
25. 7802273 06-12-2010
Purnima Jewellers Bazar Peth , Mahavir Prabhu Chowk , Kalyan WestDist : Thane - 421301 2745/91/08/17
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and GoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 10658 :
1999
Specification for Higher Capacity Dry Powder Fire Extinguisher (Trolley Mounted)
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys, Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking-. Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4182
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
28-1-2010
26. 7800875
B.R. Akerkar & Sons Jewellers Shop No. 180, Bhiwandiwala Building, Dattaram Lad Marg , Kalachowki , Mumbai-400033
28-11-2010
27. 7800168
Niraj Ornament Shop No. 11 , Saidham Building, Saibaba Mandir Road, Saibaba Nagar, Borivali West , Mumbai-400092
12-11-2010
28. 7796611
Millennium Shop No. 5, Ground Floor , 93/95 , Golden Plaza, Dhanji Street, Mumbai -400003 11-02-2009
29. 7819391
Geo Fire Remedies Pvt . Ltd. Plot No. L94 MIDC . Taloja , Navi Mumbai , Mumbai - 410208 30-01-2011
30. 7817690
Gavri Jewellers , 6/7 , Roopa Co - op . Hsg. Society, Opp . Reliance Web World , S.T. Stand Road Nallasopara (West) Thane 401203
17-02-2011
31. 7821176
Bhairav Jewellers Jain Plaza Shivaji Chowk , Ambernath (E) Mumbai-421501 28-11-2010
32. 7800673
Shakappoor Chand Somchandji & Co., 460 , New Mill Road , Kurla WestMumbai -4000070
21-01-2011
33. 7815686
Mangalmani Jewellers, Shop No. 22, Saiprasad Shopping Complex, Sector - 8 , Phase- 2 , Nerul , Mumbai-400706
23-2-2010
34. 7808487
Charbhuja Jewellers , Shop No. 5, Opp. Railway Phatak, Bazar Road , Virar East , Thane - 401303
17-03-2009
35. 7827693
M/s. Associated Transrail Structures Ltd. , Survey No. 178 , to 182, Dungripada, Village Amboli , Kherdi- Surnagi Road, Dadra and Nagar Haveli , Silvassa 396230
28-11-2010
36. 7800471
Deepa Jewellers Shop No. 4 , Sai Chaya Society, Kokan Nagar , J.M. Road, Opp. Hanuman Mandir , Bandup West, Mumbai -400078
07-11-2010
37. 7795508
Pushparaj Jewellers , Gujrat Bhavan , Opp . Vishnu Mandir , Bazar Peth , Kalyan , West Thane 421301
22-11-2010
38. 7798514
Chain Plus 109 , Dhanji Street, Shop No. 2,Ground floor , Mumbai 400003 39. 7808285 23-12-201.0
Sinduri Jewellers , Shop No. 9, Laxminarayan Shopping Centre , Parnaka Bhiwandi , Mumbai -421302
15-01-2011
40. 7813884
Suashish Diamonds Ltd. (Jewellery Division ) , ShopNo . 3 , Galleria , Hiranandani Garden, Powai , Mumbai - 400076
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]
(6)
(5)
IS 1417:
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 13386 : 1992
Specification for 50 letre capacity fire extinguisher , mechanical foam type
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artfacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artrfacts- Fineness and Marking - Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness Marking - Specification Gold and Gold Alloys ,
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking - Specification
IS 1417: 1999
IS 398:
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness andMarking - Specification Aluminium Conductors for
Part 2:1996 overhead transmission Purposes: Part 2 Aluminium conductors , Galvanized steel reinforced
IS 1417
1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417: 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417: 1999
IS 1417 1999 Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts Fineness andMarking - Specification Gold andGoldAlloys, Jewellery / Artefacts - Fineness and
IS 1417:
1999 Marking - Specification GoldandGoldAlloys , Jewellery Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
(3)
(1) (2)
(4) 41. 7813985 15-01-2011
Sanjay Dattatray Dandekar Jewellers , At Post Taluka Khed , Sonar Ali , Khed Ratnagiri 415709
42. 7802576 06-12-2010
Kanchan Jewellers , Ratan Bhuvan Gandhi Chowk, Bazar Peth, Kallyan, West Thane-421301 43. 7808588 23-12-2010
YG Pendurkar& Co. , 19-20 , Gangadhar Niwas , Gokhale Road(North), Dadar, West Mumbai- 400028
44. 7799415 26-11-2010
Nayaab Jewels , 2nd Floor , 898 , Notan Plaza , Turner Road Bandra , WestMumbai-400050 45. 7807889 23-12-2010
Prakashchnad Hirachand , Bazar Peth, Gandhi Chowk , Kalyan West Thane-421301 46. 7815585 21-01-2011
Mayura Jewellers , I Gahlot Complex, Near Sahakar Bajar, Plot No. 28 -A , Sector - 10 , F - II , Nerul (West) Mumbai -400706
47. 7818389 31-01-2011
Dr.Vidyadhar Gopal Oke jewellers Pvt. Ltd. , Shop No. 1 , Castle Mill Naka, L.B.S. Marg, Thane (W) Thane-400601 48. 7808689 25-12-2010
Ambulal Motiram & Sons Jewellers 2, Sunita, Opp. Colaba P.O. , Colaba, Mumbai-400005 49. 7808891 26-12-2010 NarenKumar Jewellers, 22 Upavan Queens Park , Near Raymond Show Room, Mira -Bhayandar Road, Mira Road East , Thane 401107 50. 7800774 28-11-2010
S. V. Phanasgaonkar Jewellers , 12, Madhav Bhuvan , Jehagir Merwanji Street , Parel , Mumbai 400012 51. 7794910 06-11-2010
B. T. Parmar 546 , Kamani Wadi , Chira Bazar , Mumbai -400002
52. 7814987 20-01-2011
Shree Anand Jewellers , Shop No. 2 Hari Hareshwar Devali Trust , Papdy Naka , Vasai ( West ) Thane401202 53. 7827592 17-03-2009
M/s. Associated Transrail Structures Ltd. , Survey No. 178 to 182, Dungripada Village , Amboli , Kherdi - Surangi Road , Dadra and Nagar Haveli , Silvassa
4183
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
(5)
(6)
IS 1417: 1999
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold andGoldAlloys, Jewellery Artefacts- Fineness and Marking - Specification Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking-
IS 1417 : 1999
Specification Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Goldand GoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery /Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery /Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold andGoldAlloys, Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS398 : Part 1:1996 Aluminium conductors for overhead transmission purposes: Part 1 Aluminium stranded conductors 4184
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/SRAVANA 11 , 1930
(3)
(4) (1) (2)
23-12-2010
54. 7807990
Sangeeta Jewellers, Shop No. 10-B Shyamkamal Building , Agarwal Market, Vile Parle East , Mumbai- 400057 26-02-2011
55. 7824081
Mansi Jewellers , Shop No. 1 , Keshav Bhavan , Near Shiv Sena Office, M.G. Road, Mulund (W), Mumbai-400080 06-02-2011
56. 7802677
Poonam Jewellers , Bazar Peth , Mahavir Prabhu Chowk , Kalyan West, Thane-421301 23-12-2010
57. 7808184
Dinesh Jewellers , 3 Darshan Apartment, Irani Road , Dahanu Road , Thane -401602 21-01-2011
58. 7815484
Shubham Jewellers , Shop No. 13 , Minakshi Tower , Plot No. - 68 , Sector - 16, Nerul , Navi Mumbai -400706 59. 7799617 26-11-2010
G.V. Sons, Shop No. 8 , Jalaram Nagar No.3 , Vallabh Baug Lane Ghatkopar East, Mumbai -400077
12-11-2008
60, 7796308
M/ s . Mukesh Metal Industries 1.05 , Samyak , Sagar Plaza Industrial Complex, Vasai Sativali Road, Vasai (E) , Thane 401208
07-11-2010
61. 7795609
Megha Jewellers , Shop No. 6, Jalaram Co -Op . Housing Society, Jalaram Nagar , M.G. Road, Ghatkopar East, Mumbai -400077
62. 7812478 13-01-2011
Mukund Atmaram Palshetkar & Sons Jewellers , 94/96, Dr. BJ Marg, Thakurdwar, Mumbai -400002
23-01-2011
63. 7816183
Aarti Jewellers , Pvt . Ltd. , Hormuz Mansion , Breach Candy , 72, Bhulabhai Desai Road , Mumbai 400026 05-12-2010
64. 7801776
Megha Jewellers , Shop No.6 , Zaver Arcade , Zaver Road , Mulund West Mumbai -400080
13-01-2011
65. 7812579
Swarna Palace Jewellers , Shop No.1 , Khimji Maharaj Building , MG Road, Mulund West , Mumbai 400080 66. 7810575 06-01-2011
ShreeMahavir Jewellers , 2 Sapana Co-Op Hsg . Society Ltd , LB S Marg , Ghatkopar West, Mumbai 400086
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii )] (5)
(6)
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- -Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- -Specification
JS 1417 : 1999
GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- -Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- -Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 2112: 2003
Silver and Silver Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 7231 : 1994
Specification for Plastic flushing cisterns for waterclosets and urinals
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Goldand Gold Alloys, Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS2112:
2003
Silver and Silver Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
(1) (2)
(3)
(4) 67. 7819492 11-02-2009
Geo Fire Remedies , Pvt . Ltd. , Plot No. L 94 MIDC . Taloja , Navi Mumbai -410208 68. 7813480 16-01-2011
Sentiments , 86/87 , Ashoka Shopping Centre, 2nd Floor , L.T. Marg , G.T. Hospital Complex , Mumbai- 400001 69. 7825083 03-03-2011
Mayura Jewellers , Shop No. 3 , Dr.Matha Apt. Agashi Road , Virar (W) , Thane-401303 70. 7821075 17-02-2011
KantiJewellers , Geet Ganga Building, Shop No. 1 , Opp . B.P.L. GallaryThane-400602 71. 7821984 18-02-2009
Geo Fire Remedies Pvt. Ltd. , Plot No L 94 MIDC. Taloja , Navi Mumbai -410208 72. 7830884 26-03-2011
Kalpataru Jewellers, 78, Vithalwadi , 1stFloor, Shop No. 10, Navinchandra Building Kalbadevi Road , Mumbai -400002 73. 7822784 19-02-2009 Hemratna Safety Industries , Rachna Industrial , Estate, Dr. Patil Compound, Chandasar , Kopri , Virar(E) Mumbai-401303 74. 7793201 31-10-2010 Balaji Gold, 13 , Morya Shopping Centre , Airoli , Navi Mumbai- 400708 75. 7804984 12-12-2010
Mahavir Jewellers , 218 -A, M.Ν. Nagar, Kokri Agar, Antop Hill, Mumbai-400037 76. 7807788 23-12-2010
Pukhraj Bhagwanji & Co. , Bazar peth, Gandhi Chowk Kalyan (West) Thane-421301 77. 7825689 09-03-2011
Utsav Jewellers , F -5 /20, Shantivan Society, Sector No -6, C.B.D. Bellapur Thane 400614 78. 7810878 06-01-2011
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
4185 (5)
(6)
IS 10658 :
1999
Specification for Higher Capacity Dry Powder Fire Extinguisher (Trolley Mounted)
IS 1417:
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999
GoldandGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417
1999
Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS2878 : 2004
Specification for fire Extinguisher , Carbon Dioxide Type (Portable and Trolley Mounted)
IS 1417:
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 4308: 2003
Dry Chemical Powder for Fighting B and C Class Fires- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
DeepakGold Jewellers , 514/516,
JSS Road , Chirabazar Mumbai-
400002
Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification 4186
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
(4)
(3)
(1) (2)
17-12-2008
79. 7805481
Pratibha Industries Limited . , Plot No. 215, Vijaypur , P.O. Kone , Bhivandi- Wada Road, Tal . - Wada , Dist. Thane-421303 19-02-2009
80. 7822683
Swagattam Plastics Gala No. 4 , Daman Industrial Estate , Near Deccan Cans , GDDIDC , Dabhel Daman396210
16-01-2011
81. 7814280
Classic Diamonds (India) Limited E-5 , Sub Plot No. 15 , Wicel F - 11 & F - 12 , Midc, Marol , Andheri East, Mumbai 400093 22-11-2010
82. 7798918
NSN Jewellers , 4/B , Mayfair, 26 , S.V. Road, Opp. Siddharth Hotel Bandra West , Mumbai 400050 06-12-2010
83. 7802172
Prathamesh Jewellers , 10, Mukund Niwas , Manpada Road, Dombivli East, Thane 421201 25-12-2010
84. 7808790
Shubham Jewellers Shop No.65 , Galleria, Hiranandani Powai , Mumbai 400076
28-11-2010
85. 7800067
GiftGold 187/193 , Kapadia Building, 1st Floor Zaveri Bazar , Mumbai 400002
23-01-2011
86. 7816688
Kacha Jewellers 97-101 , Mumbadevi Chambers , 4th Floor , Shop No. 60 , Zaveri Bazar , Mumbai 400002 30-01-2011
87. 7817589
Treasures 1 /A Dharam Palace , Hughes Road, N.S. Patkar Marg , Mumbai 400007 06-12-2010
88. 7802071
Instyle Jewellery Plot No. 15 , Phase II , Street No , 10, Behind Hotel Tunga Paradies , MIDC Andheri , EastMumbai 400093 13-01-2011
89. 7814078
Gem Impex 103 , Roopraj , 497, SVP Road , Mumbai 400004 09-12-2010
90. 7803275
Swarnmala Jewellers 7 , Gurunanak Estate , M.G. Road, Mulund , West Mumbai 400080
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
(6)
(5)
IS 3589 : 2001
Steel Pipes for Water and Sewage (168.3 to 2. 540 mm Outside Diameter) - Specification
IS 14927 :
Cable Trunking and Ducting
Part2: 2001
Systems for Electrical Installations : Part 2 Cable Trunking and Ducting Systems Intended for Mounting on Walls orCeiling
IS 1417 :
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS1417:
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 :
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold andGold Alloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys- Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys- Jewellery /Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
GoldandGold Alloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Goldand Gold Alloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
(1) (2)
(3)
(4) 91. 7827794 17-03-2011
Chintamani Jewellers 2 , Saraswati Apartment , Opp . Eye Hospital , Shankarrao Chowk Kalyan (W) , Thane 421301 92. 7800572 28-11-2010
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
4187 (5)
(6)
IS 1417 :
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
MunGems 303 , Panchratna Opera
House Mumbai 400004
93. 7799718 26-11-2010
94. 7810474 06-01-2011
Arhamm Diamond Jewellery Pvt. Ltd. 6, Sambhav Darshan , 1st Floor 226, Raja Ram Mohan Roy Road , Near,Girgaon Church, Mumbai 400004 Calyx Corporation B- 107 , Dharam Palace, N S Patkar Marg, Gamdevi
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold andGoldAlloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Mumbai 400007
95. 7836795 14-04-2009
Gold andGoldAlloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
MRF Ltd. , P.B.No. 1 , North Goa ,
Goa403401
96. 7798009 19-11-2010
M.J. Jewellers Shop No. 4 , Chintamani Apartments , Opp. Shankar Lane Garden . S.V. P: Road Kandivli West Mumbai 400067
97. 7810777 06-01-2011
IS 15636 : 2005
Automotive Vehicles - PneumaticTyres for Commercial Vehicles- Diagonal and Radial Ply
IS 1417:
1999
GoldandGold Alloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Mayur Jewellers 571 , JSS Road ,
Chirabazar Mumbai 400002
98. 7812175 10-01-2011
Mani Jewel A/34 , Nandbhuvan Indl . Estate, Mahakali Caves Road, Andheri East Mumbai 400093
99. 7811173 07-01-2011
Om Shree Gajanan Jewellers Ram Apartment , Katemanivali Naka Kalyan East Thane 421306 100. 7810373 02-01-2011
Vijay Centre Jewellers 312, GoldenPlaza, 3rd Floor , 97/99 , Dhanji Street , Mumbai 400003
101. 7804782 11-12-2010 Mangal Enterprises 105-B Gokul Arcade, Swami Nityanand Marg VileParle East Mumbai 400057
102. 7813783 15-01-2011
Kevalram Ghanshamdas Popley & Sons Jewellers Panchartna Building, 56/57 ,Ground Floor , Opera House, Mumbai 400004
103. 7807586 23-12-2010 Mayur Jewellers 196, Kalu Bhuvan Building, L. J. Road Mahim Mumbai 400016
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and GoldAlloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold andGoldAlloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys- Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 :. 1999
Gold andGoldAlloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
GoldandGoldAlloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4188
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
04/12/2010
104. 7801675
Sama Jewellers Private Limited 313 VasanUdyog Bhavan, Off. Senapati Bapat Marg Lower Parel, Mumbai
06/12/2010
105. 7802475
Dalichand Chimnaji Jewellers Bazar Peth, Gandhi Chowk Kalyan WestMumbai 421301 22/11/2010
106. 7798817
Alankar Soni Manilal & Bros. Jewellers Shop No. 6 , Savani Apartments , Rajawadi , M. G. Road Ghatkopar East Mumbai 400077
09/12/2010
107. 7803578
Dharamchand Paraschand & Company A- 42, Nandkishor Industrial Estate , Off. Mahakali CavesRoad , Near Paper Box Company Andheri East Mumbai 400093
26/11/2010
108. 7799516
G.V. Sons Shop No. 8 , Jalaram Nagar No. 3 , Vallabh Baug Lane Ghatkopar East Mumbai 400077
26/12/2010
109.7808992
Kishor Jewellers Shiv Market Road , D. M. C. Road Ambarnath West Thane 421501
26/12/2010
110. 7809186
NBhau ( Jewellers ) Pvt . Ltd. 436 , Dr. Dadasaheb Bhadkamkar Marg , (Lamingtion Road ) Mumbai 400004
13/03/2011
111. 7826893
Falguni Jewellers Gold Silver Bullion Shop No. 2, Prathmesh Plaza, Near Natural Icecream Agashi Road Virar , West Thane 401303
02-03-2011
112. 7824586
ArunS. Mankame & Sons Shivaji Chowk, Opp . Canara Bank, Jain Plaza Ambarnath (E ) Thane
30-01-2011
113.7817791
Vishad Jewellers Pvt . Ltd. 13- Vikash Paradise , Bhakti Marg, Off L. B. S. Marg Mulund (W) Mumbai 400080
18-03-2009
114. 7828089
M/s . Kishco Ltd. Plot No. E19/B & C, MIDC , Sinnar Industrial Area , Sinnar Thane Malegaon Nashik 422113
11-12-2010
115. 7804479
P& S Jewellers Ltd. Sakina Manzil No. 2, 4th Floor , Raja Ram Mohan Roy Road New Charni Road 400004
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]
(6)
(5)
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys- Jewellery /Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 :
1999
Gold andGoldAlloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGoldAlloys- Jewellery /Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGoldAlloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 Gold andGold Alloys- Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS2112: 2003 Silver and Silver Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 Gold andGoldAlloys- Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1660
Part I : 1982 Specification for Wrought Aluminium Utensils Part 1: Cooking table , serving storing and baking utensils
IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
(1) (2)
(3) 116. 7799819 26-11-2010 117.7828897 23-03-2011 118. 7803073 09-12-2008
Daman-396210
119. 7805582 17-12-2008 120.7807485 26-12-2010 121. 7804883 11-12-2010 122. 7808083 23-12-2010
4189
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
(5)
(4)
(6)
IS 1417 :
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Devi Jewellers Shop No. 1 , Neelyog Apartment, M.G. Cross Road No. 4, Opp. Patel Nagar, Krishna Nagar Kandivali West Mumbai 400067
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Verlekar Jewellers C/ o Ulhas Jewellers Pvt . Ltd. Near Municipality, New Market, Post Box No. 73 , North Goa , Margao -403601 Trikaya Plasto Industires 189/1 (4) , Panchal Udyog Nagar , Bhimpore
IS9537: Part3 : 1983
Conduits for electrical Installations : Part 3 Rigid Plainconducts of insulating materials (superseding IS :2509)
IS 5504 : 1997
Specification for Spiral Welded Pipes
Pratibha industries Limited . ShrikantChambers , Phase II 5thFloor , Sion-Trombay Road , Chembur, Mumbai . -400071
IS 1417; 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Spectrum Jewellery Pvt . Ltd. Ground Floor (Part) Backside , Prince Arcade , C- 10 , Central Road, Marol MIDC Andheri East , Mumbai-400093
IS 1417 :
1999
Meerah Jewels Plot No. 87, Street No. 15 , MIDC Andheri East, Mumbai -400093
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999
L Sunderdas Zaveri 4, Dharam
Palace, Hughes Road, Mumbai
400007
123. 7801574 04-12-2010 124. 7799920 28-11-2010
12-11-2008 125. 7796510
126. 7813581 16-01-2011 127. 7803174 09-12-2010 2745 G1/08-18
*Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 :
1999
Om Jewellers Bhikoba Niwas , Gokhale Road (N) Dadar West , Mumbai-400028
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Milap Gold Shop No. 4, Manish Apartment, Mathuradas Road , Karidivli West Mumbai 400067
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 13386 : 1992
Specification for 50 letre capacity fire extinguisher, mechanical foam type
Vintex fire Protection Pvt . Ltd. , Unit No. 1 , Ashok Indl . Estate , L.B.S. Marg , Mulund (W) , Mumbai-400080
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Star Gens Shop No. 12, New Jaldarshan , Gr . Floor, 288 Chimbai Road , Opp . Perry Cross Road, Near Pinky Wines , Bandra, Mumbai -400050
IS 1417 : 1999
Prashant Jewellers 4, Govind Kunj , J. N. Road, Mulund West Mumbai- 400080 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery /Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4190
(4)
(3)
(1) (2)
06-12-2011
128. 7810676
CasDesign 224 , 2nd Floor, Kama Indl Estate , 8 S B Road Lower Parel, Mumbai -400013 06-11-2010
7794708
129,
S. K. Shah & Sons 500/502 , J. S. S Road Chira Bazar Mumbai -400002
7801877 06-12-2010
130.
Shrenuj and Company Limited 21 , Pathe Bapurao Marg, Diana Talkies Lane, Tardeo , Mumbai -400034
22-11-2010
131. 7798615
Safari Gems ( Jewellers ) Bombay Bazar , Station Road, Chepal Lane Santacruz West Mumbai -400054
11-03-2009
7826085
132.
M/S. Goyal Allied Steel (P) Ltd. , 58/1 , P.T. Vasuri Khurd , Tal . Wada Thane-421303
28-02-2011
7824283
133.
Dattarraya & Sons Prabhu Ashish , Ram Mandir Road , Vile- Parle (E) Mumbai -400057
17-02-2011
7821378
134.
Kanchan Jewellers Shop No. 3 , Moti Villa Thane (East )
17-02-2011
135. 7821277
Sanjoli Jewellers Shop No. 9, Tulsi Mahal ( E ) Talav Road , Bhayandar (East)-401105
18-11-2010
136. 7797815
Mithali Gold 11 , Mahavir Bhakti , Opp. DMart , Sector 15, Koparkhairane Navi Mumbai , Thane -400709
31-10-2010
7791904
137.
N. K. J. Gems & Jewels Pvt . Ltd. , 1/1705 , Challenger , Thakur Village , Kandivli East, Mumbai -400101
31-01-2009
7817892
138.
Monotona Tyres Ltd. , Gut No. 279 , 286, 287 ( P) , Dakivali Village , Bhiwandi Wada Road , Near Tansa River , Tal . Wada Thane,
23-03-2009
139. 7828392
M/S Savitri Steels Industries D - 12, Madkaim Industrial Estate , Madkaim North Goa 403404
10-12-2010
140. 7803679
Jewellers Shantilal & Sons 1/5 , Rajda, Building , 2nd Floor, Room No. 7 , 2nd X Old Hnuman Lane , Mumbai 400002
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]
(6)
(5)
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999
Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 :
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999
Gold and GoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1786:
1985
Specification for high strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement
IS 1417 :
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Fineness and Marking- Specification Jewellery/Artefacts-
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999 Goldand Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 15627 : 2005 Pneumatic Tyres for Two and Automotive Vehicles , Three- Wheeled Motor Vehicles Specification
IS 1786 : 1985 Specification for high strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement
IS 1417 : 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification 4191
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11, 1930
3 ( ii) ]
[ भाग II- खण्ड
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
09-12-2010
141. 7803477
Fashion jewellery Pvt . Ltd. 118 , Kansara Chawl , 1st Floor , Office No. 13/14, Near Cotton Exchanges Building , Kalbadevi Road, Mumbai 400002 13-03-2011
142. 7826792
Falguni Jewellers Gold Silver Bullion Shop No.2 , Prathmesh Plaza, Near Natural Icecream , Agashi Road virar West Mumbai 401303 06-12-2010
143. 7802778
Yashwant Potdar Jewellers Shop No. 2, Shivmati Co-Op. Housing Society, Uttam Road, Near Gopika Talkies , Bhayandar West , Thane 401101 144 7814179 16-01-2011
Kalash Jewels Shop No.5 & 6, Jalaram Estates , MG Road Mulund West Mumbai 400080
31-01-2011
145. 7818288
Aditya the Jewellery World 7 , SuyojitAvdhoot Tower , Old Gangapur Naka, Gangapur Road Nashik Mumbai 422005
19-02-2009
146. 7822885
Hemratna Safety Industries Rachna Industrial Estate , Dr. Patil Compound, Chandasar , Kopri , Virar(E) Mumbai 401303
21-01-2011
147.7815383
Shl Gems Jewellery Ltd. 4-A- 12, Sona Udyog Industrial Estate , Parsi Panchyat Road , Andhri (East)Mumbai 400069
06-11-2010
148. 7795104
Vidhata Jewellers 9 , Grampanchayat Road Goregaon West Mumbai 400062
15-01-2009
149. 7812781
Polysil Pipes Survey No. 103/1/2
Rakholi Industrial Area , Village; Rakholi Dadra and Nagar Haveli Silvassa Mumbai 396230
09-03-2011
150.7825992
Aadinath Gems & Jewellers Pvt . Ltd. 202/2B, Queens Diamond , Opera House Charni Road Mumbai 400004
13-01-2011
151. 7812276
Nainraj Enterprises Pvt . Ltd. 325 , Amba Sadan , Linking Road Khar West Mumbai 400052
(6)
(5)
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 :
1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 :
1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417:
1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 14609 : 1999
Dry Chemical Powder for Fighting A , B , C Class Fires Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 12818 :
Specification for unplasticized
1992
PVC screen and casing Pipes for bore/tubewell
IS 1417: 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification 4192
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
(1)
(3)
(2)
(4) 152. 7795003 06-11-2010
Sushama Jewellery 1 /A , Ruby Chamber , 40/42 , Dhanji Street Mumbai , Mumbai -400003
153. 7794809 06-11-2010 Mangalam Jewellers Survey No. 11 . Sector - 1 , C. B. D. Belapur Thane- 400614 154. 7809085 25-12-2010 Shantilal Shobhavat & Sons Shop No. 3 Kamal Niwas , NC Kelkar Road Dadar West Mumbai -400028
155. 7816082 23-01-2011 Aarti Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. , Hormuz Mansion , Breach Candy , 72, Bhulabhai Desai Road Mumbai- 400026 23-12-2010
156.7807687
MM Art Jewellers 8 B/9 , Rutanmal Mahal, Plot No.38 , L. J. Road Mahim Mumbai -400016 157. 7827087 16-03-2011
A EMotiwala Sir J J Road , Shop No. 2, Fortune Tower , Opp.Addl Commissioner ofPolice Office , NarHume High School Byculla Mumbai -400008 158. 7813682 15-01-2011
Shreenath Jewellers Plot No. B - 12 , 2nd Floor , Indraprashta Shopping Centre , S V Road Borivali WestMumbai- 400092 159. 7803376 10-12-2010
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] (5)
(6)
IS 1417: 1999
Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold.Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
R. V. Jewellers 144-Sheikh Memon
StreetMumbai - 400002
160. 7813379 16-01-2011
Virhem Exports 5, Sweekar 72 Vallabhbhai Road Vile Parle Mumbai -400056 161. 7815282 20-01-2011
Saitawadekar Jewellers Shop No.2 Padma Takies Building, Ground Floor , Bazarpeth Chiplun Ratnagiri-415605 162. 7810979 06-01-2011
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
IS 1417: 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification
Naqsh Collection 321 , Panchratna ,
Opera HouseMumbai -400004
IS 1417 : 1999
Gold and Gold Alloys, Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- specification
[No. CMD/13 : 11 ] P. K. GAMBHIR, Dy . Director General ( Marks)
नई दिल्ली, 28 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2062.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड (ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-
4193 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
अनुसूची
स्थापित तिथि
स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या , वर्ष और
शीर्षक
क्रम संख्या
नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
30जून , 2008
आई एस 4873 : 1993
1. आई एस 4873 ( भाग 1 ) : 2008 फफूँदी और बेधकों (पाउडर पोस्ट बीटल ) से लकड़ी की सुरक्षा के प्रयोगशाला परीक्षण की पद्धति: भाग 1 फफूंदी से लकड़ी की सुरक्षा के थ्रेशहोल्ड मान ज्ञात करना ( दूसरा पुनरीक्षण )
30अप्रैल , 2008 2.
आई एस 4873 : 1993
आई एस 4973 ( भाग 2 ) : 2008 फफूँदी और बेधकों (पाउडर पोस्ट बीटल ) से लकड़ी की सुरक्षा के प्रयोगशाला परीक्षण की पद्धति: भाग 2 बेधकों ( पाउडर पोस्ट बीटल ) से लकड़ी की सुरक्षा के थ्रेशहोल्ड मान ज्ञात करना (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)
आई एसं 6874 : 1973
30जून , 2008 3. आई एस 6874 : 2008 बाँस के लिए परीक्षण विधि (पहला पुनरीक्षण)
इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[संदर्भ: सीईडी/राजपत्र ]
ए. के. सैनी, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी )
New Delhi , the 28th July, 2008
S.O. 2062.- In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
Date of Established Sl .No.
No. & Year of the Indian Standards Established
No. & Year of Indian Standards , if any, Supersededby the New Indian Standard
(4)
(3)
(2)
( 1)
30June 2008
IS4873 : 1993
1.
IS 4873 ( Part 1) : 2008 Methods of laboratory testing of wood preservatives against fungi and borers (Powderpost beetles) : Part 1 Determination of Threshold values of wood preservatives against fungi (Second revision)
IS4873 : 1993
30April 2008 2.
IS 4873 (Part 2): 2008 Methods of laboratory testing ofwood Preservatives against fungi and borers (Powderpost beetles ): Part 2 Determination of Threshold values of wood Preservatives against borers (Powderpost beetles) ( Second revision )
30Jume , 2008
IS 6874: 1973
3.
IS 6874: 2008 Method of Tests for Bamboo ( First Revision)
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolcatta , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad , Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .
[Ref: CED/Gazette ]
A. K. SAINI , Sc . ' F ' & Head ( Civil Engg .) .4194
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[PART II- SEC . 3(ii )]
पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 22 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2063.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन )अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप-धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी, भारत के राजपत्र, तारीख 09.12.2007 15.12.2007 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का आ. संख्या 3487 तारीख 15.12.2007 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची तालुका-वडोदरा , जिला वडोदरा, राज्य गुजरात कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी.
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां ता. 06/03/2007 से जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिर्पोट दे दी है;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए;
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग, करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में विनिर्दष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरशन लिमिटेड में सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की इस तारीख से निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
जिला: वडोदरा
तालुका: वडोदरा
राज्य : गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
गाँव का नाम
उपखण्ड नं .
एयर
सर्वेक्षण में खण्ड में.
हेक्टर
वर्ग मिटर 1
2
5
3
4
6 आसाज
242
0
03
40
[फा. सं. आर-25011/5/2005-ओ.आर. - 1 ]
एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4195 भारत का राजपत्र: अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas
New Delhi , the 22th July, 2008
S. O. 2063. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India , in the Ministry ofPetroleum and Natural Gas S.O. number 3487 dated the 15.12.2007 , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands in Tehsil : Vadodara , District : Vadodara in the State of Gujarat specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Koyali to Ratlam in the state of Gujarat a Pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas, the copies of the said Gazette Notification were made available to the public on the 06/03/2007;
And whereas , the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act submitted his report to the Central Government
And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of the publication of this declaration in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances.
Schedule
District: -Vadodara
State:-Gujarat Tehsil: -Vadodara
Area
Survey No /Block No
Sub-Division No.
Nameof Village
Hectare Are Centiare
6
4
5
3
2
1
0 03 40
242
Asoj
[ F. No. R-25011/5/2005-0.R. - 1 ]
S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.
4196
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]
नई दिल्ली, 22 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2064. - केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी, भारत के राजपत्र, तारीख 09 12 2007 15.12.2007 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का आ. संख्या 3491 तारीख 15.12.2007 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची तालुका-सावली, जिला- वडोदरा , राज्य गुजरात में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरशन लिमिटेड, द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी.
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां ता. 06/03/2007 से जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिर्पोट दे दी है;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में विनिर्दष्ट भूमि में. उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की इस तारीख से निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
जिला: वडोदरा
तालूका:सावलि
गाँव का नाम
सर्वेक्षण सं खण्ड सं .
1
2
714 पिलोल
1136
131 इंद्रल
1276
1276
1276
775
535
1239 भेमार
539
536
559
610
46
राज्य: गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
उपखण्ड सं.
वर्ग मिटर
एयर
हेक्टर
6
4
5
3
01
54
0
17
14
0
10
80
0
0
06
48 4
80
64
0
4.3
60
0
57
2
73
17
0
71
03
0
P
95
0
06
0
09
93 2
1-9
08
P
0
16
18
0
2
01
81
0
03
0
1
08 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
2
114 बडदला
142+141
140
136
182 आदलबाडा
182
137 लोटना
28
22
188 हरिपुरा
163
164
161
331 मूढेला
4197
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008 / श्रावण 11 , 1930
5
4
6 3
2P
10
0
98
0
P
25
38
12
0
60
03
0
64 6
12
0
24
04
50
0
23
0
10
08
0
00
81
0
31
64
15
0
12
0
18
00
0
18
90
0
15
84
0
09
18 [फा. सं. आर-25011/5/2005- ओ.आर. - 1 ]
एस. के. चिटकारा, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 22th July, 2008
S. O. 2064.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India , in the Ministry ofPetroleum and Natural Gas S.O. number 3491 dated the 15.12.2007. issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50. of 1962 ) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands in Tehsil Savli . District : Vadodara in the State of Gujarat specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Koyali to Ratlam in the state of Gujarat a Pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas, the copies of the said Gazette Notification were made available to the public on the 06/03/2007;
And whereas , the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act submitted his report to the Central Government;
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of the publication of thisdeclaration in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .
2745 G1/ 08-19 4198
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008/SRAVANA 11 , 1930
Tehsil: -Savali District:-Vadodara Nameof Village Survey No/Block No 1
2
Pillol
714
1136
131
Indral
1276
1276
1276
775
535
1239
539
Vemar
536
559
610
46
114
Vadadla
142+141
140
136
182
Adalvada
182
137
Lotna
28
22
188
Haripura
163
164
161
331
Mudhela
[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] Schedule
State: -Gujarat
Area
Sub-Division No.
Hectare Are Centiare
4
6 3
5
0
01
54
0
17
14
10
0
80 4
48
0
06
0
64
80
0
60
57
32-
73
17
0
71
03
0
95
0
06
93
0
09
19
0
08
P.2P7
0
16
18
0
81
01
1
0
08
03 2P
0
10
98
38
25
P
0
0
60
12
64
0
03
12
24 6
0
04
50
0
10
0
23
08
0
00
81
64
0
31
12
0
15
00
0
18
0
18
90
0
84
15
0
18
09
[F. No. R -25011/5/2005 - O.R. - I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 22 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2065.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन )अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी , भारत के राजपत्र, तारीख 09.12 2007 15.12 2007 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का आ. मंख्या 3492 तारीख 15.12.2007 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची तालुका-लिमखेडा , जिला दाहोद, राज्य गुजरात में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी.
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां ता. 06/03/2007 से जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी :
और मक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिर्पोट 4199
भारत का राजपत्र: अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए:
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में विनिर्दष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की इस तारीख से निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
जिला : दाहोद तालूका:लिमखेडा
उपखण्ड सं.
गाँव कानाम
सर्वेक्षण सं खण्ड सं .
3 1
2
12
3 खुदा
12
2
12
1
172
2
3
172
3
18
2
18
1
18
14
1
3
26
5
26
4
26.
4
35
58
P5
58
P19
39
P
1
68
खिरखाई
2P3
68
86
6
87
235
236
1P1
165
P31
165
4
P3 भलुडीं
4
P58
27
58 पलिसमल
P
27
27
P11
47/20
27
राज्य: गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
वर्गमिटर हेक्टर
एयर
4
6
5
03
24 0
0
04
55
64
02
0
12
78 0
02
20 0
26 0
10
06
48 0
0
09
36
01
0
80
78 0
00
60 0
03
0
18
00
0
11
88
60 0
12
44 0
17
16
56 0
0
01
00
14
04 0
39
48
0
48
15
0
04
95 0
15
80 0
42
24
0
10 0
09
30
24
0
42 0
57.
50
04
0
21
06 0
14
28
0
80 0
19 4200
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/SRAVANA 11 , 1930
1
2
3
27
45 पलिसमलः जारी...
27
48
27
P6 कंबई
40
P14/1
40
P40/7
40
P18P/1
40
P7/3
40
P/7 / 1P2
40
56/P1
40
P80P1 + 2
40
P/75P
40
P8P1
P/79
40
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]
5
6 4
25
0
20
23
58 0
09
00 0
0
20
16
0
10
80
21
0
60 0
10
26 0
30
06
0
17
92
69
28
0
90 0
09
00 0
22
07
98 0
[फा. सं. आर-25011/6/2005- ओ.आर. - 1] एस. के. चिटकारा, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 22th July, 2008
S. O. 2065.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India , in the Ministry ofPetroleum and Natural Gas S.O. number 3492 dated the 15.12.2007 . issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands in Tehsil Limekheda . District: Dahod in the State of Gujarat specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Koyali to Ratlam in the state of Gujarat a Pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas, the copies of the said Gazette Notification were made available to the public on the 06/03/2007;
And whereas, the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 ofthe said Act submitted his report to the Central Government;
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired;
Now , therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of the publication of this declaration in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .
4201 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
Schedule
District:-Dahod
Tehsil: -Limekheda
State:-Gujarat
Area
Name of Village
Survey No/Block No Sub-Division No.
Hectare Are Centiare
4
5
6
2
3
1
24
03
3
0
12
Kundha
04
55
12
2
0
02
64
1
0
12
78
12
172
2
0
02
20
172
3
0
10
26
3
0
18
48
06
2
0
18
36
0
09
18
1
01
1
0
80
14
78
0
00
26
3
60
03
5
0
26
18
00
4
0
26
4
0
11
88
35
60
12
0
58
P5
44
17
0
58
P19
56
16
0.
P
39
00
0
01
1
68
Khirkhai
14
04
0
2P3
68
48
39
0
86
15
0
48
6
87
95
04
0
235
0
80
15
236
24
42
0
1P1
165
10
P31
0
09
165
24
30
0
4
P3
Valundi
42
57
0
4
P58
50
0
04
27
58
Polisimal
06
0
P
21
27
14
0
28
P11
27
80
19
47/20
0
27
20
0
25
45
27
58
23
0
48
27
00
09
P6
0
27
20
16
0
P14/1
40
Kamboi
80
10
0
P40/7
40
60
21
0
40
P18P/1
26
10
0
P7 /3
40
30
06
0
P/7 /1P2
40
92
17
0
56/P1
40 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4202.
6
3
4
5
2
1
69
28
0
P80P1+2
40
Kamboi Con ...
90
0
09
P /75P
40
00
22
0
40
P8P1
07
98
0
40
P/79
[F. No. R-25011/6/ 2005- O.R. -1 ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.
नईदिल्ली, 22 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2066.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी, भारत के राजपत्र, तारीख 09.12.2007 15.12.2007 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का आ. संख्या 3494 तारीख 15.12.2007 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची तालुका- दाहोद , जिला दाहोद, राज्य गुजरात में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोग्शन लिमिटेड, द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग कें अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी.
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां ता 06/03/2007 से जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी :
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिर्पोट दे दी है:
और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में विनिदंष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की इस तारीख से निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
जिला : दाहोद
राज्य: गुजरात
तालूका :दाहोद
क्षेत्रफल
उपखण्डसं.
गाँव कानाम
वर्ग मिटर
हेक्टर
एयर
सर्वेक्षण सं- खण्ड सं.
4
5
6
2
3
1
32
85
0
5A3
1
रामपुरा
00
48
0
59
कालितलाई
20
11
0
139
बोरवानि
28
0
08 301
106P
खरोड
14
49
0
104
301
73
35
0
101P
301 भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1
3
2
2
78
खेरडी
P
94
96
120
117
122
123
124
134
133
132
131
203
204
206
208
209
210
211
124
नानिरणापुर
2
131
1
128
-
132
133
3
6
2
6
7
8
1A
26
25
1
24
22
21
20
377
नवगँव
263
284
10
319
9
319
11
319
2
392
2
391
2
399
413
P
432
P
431
4203
5
4
82 0
08
59 0
11
00
59 0
00
92 0
90
18
0
03
11
0
58
25
0
07
14 0
96
18
0
70 0
17
53
26
0
65
14
0
26 0
18
22
15
0
13
30
0
27 0
17
74 0
15
0
15
29 0
10
62 25
86 0
61
73 0
02
37 0
04 14
0
04 02
0
26 0
10
36 18
0
02 05
0
25 20
0
10 0
19
98 09
0
10 0
08
19 13
0
10
98 0
73 0
23
07 28
0
41 02.
0
84 19
0
78 17
0
93 03
0
03 13
0
26 11
0
03 14
0
12 07
0
25 01
0
15 09
0
48 26
0 4204
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008/SRAVANA 11 , 1930
6
4
5
1
2
3
तानचिया
69
01
0
38
40
2P
0
44
64 रार्चदा
266
0
00
67 भाटिवाडा
137
0
47
98
141
0
14
07
142
0
47
24
143
0
10
80
152
0
35
65
0
05
49
153
उदार
15
05
0
19
58
2/14
40
0
08
58
2/13
0
20
06
[फा. सं. आर-25011/6/2005- ओ.आर. - 1 ]
एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 22th July, 2008
S. O. 2066.-Whereas by the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry ofPetroleum and Natural Gas S.O. number 3494 dated the 15.12.2007 , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands in Tehsil : Dahod , District : Dahod in the State of Gujarat specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Koyali to Ratlam in the state of Gujarat a Pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette Notification were made available to the public on the 06/03/2007;
And whereas , the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act submitted his report to the Central Government;
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sectio. (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of the publication of this declaration in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances.
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4205
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
Tehsil:-Dahod
District:-Dahod Nameof Village Survey No/Block No 1
2
1
Rampura
Kalitalai
59 Borwani
139 Kharod
301
301
301 Kheredi
78
94
96
120
117
122
123
124
134
133
132
131
203
204
206
208
209
210
211
124
Naniranapur
131
128
132
133
6
6
7
8
26
25
24
22
21
2745 GI/08-20
Schedule
State:-Gujarat
Area
Sub-Division No.
Hectare Are Centiare 3
4
5
6 5A3
0
85
32
0
48
00
0
11
20 106P
0
28
08 104
0
14
49 101P
0
35
73
0
08
2.
82 P
11
0
59
0
00
59
0
00
92
0
18
90
0
11
03
0
25
58
07
14
0
0
18
96
0
17
70
0
26
53
0
14
65
0
18
26
0
22
15
30
0
13
0
17
27
0
15
74
0
15
29
0
10
62
0
25
86 2
0
61
73 1
0
02
37
14
0
04
02
0
04
0
26
10:
36 0
18
-32
0
05
02 0
20
25 1A
0
10
19
0
09
98 1
0
10
08
0
13
19 0
10
98 4206
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
2 1
20 Naniranapur Con ..
377 Navagam
263
284
319
319
319
392
391
399
413
432
431
69 Tanchiya
40
266 Racharda
137 Bhatiwada
141
142
143
152
153
15 Udar
58
58
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
5
6
4
3
73
23
0
28
: 07
0
41
02
0
84
19
0
78
17
0
10
93
0
03
9
03
13
0
11
26
0
11
2
03
14
0
2
12
0
07
2
25
01
0
15
09
0
P
48
0
26
P
38
01
0
64
44
0
2P
67
0
00
47
98
0
14
07
0
47
24
0
10
80
0
65
35
0
49
05
0
19
0
05
40
08
0
2/14
06
20
0
2/13
[F. No. R- 25011/6/2005 - O.R. - I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 22 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2067.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन )अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी, भारत के राजपत्र , तारीख 09.12.2007 15.12.2007 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का आ . संख्या 3495 तारीख 15.12.2007 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची तालुका-बारिया , जिला दाहोद राज्य गुजरात में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी.
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां ता 06/03/2007 में जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी :
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिर्पोट दे दी है ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाएः
!
4207
भारत का राजपत्र: अगस्त 2, 2008/श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की. उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में विनिर्दष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार कंन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की इस तारीख से निहित होगा ।
तालूका: बारिया
गाँव का नाम
सर्वेक्षण सं खण्ड सं.
2 1
192 मोतीझरी
33
4
4
7
234 पिपलोद
240
582
571
97 पंन्चेला
89
88
88
88
88
7 नाथुडी
अनुसूची
राज्य: गुजरात.
जिला: दाहोद
क्षेत्रफल
उपखण्ड सं.
वर्ग मिटर
हेक्टर
एयर
6
5
4
3
53
17
0
59
0
09
1+2
11
05
0
1
11
28
0
2
40
07
0
2
08
28
0
14
12
0
1
40
23
0
82
20
0
2
26
83
0
P2
08
0
19
5
16
11
0
1
10
80
0
3
61
02
0
5
00
10
0
4
30
33
0
[फा. सं . आर-25011/6/2005- ओ.आर. - 1 ]
एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 22th July, 2008
S. O. 2067.-Whereas by the notification of the Government of India , in the Ministry ofPetroleum and Natural Gas S.O. number 3495 dated the 15.12.2007, issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands in Tehsil Bariya , District : Dahod in the State of Gujarat specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Koyali to Ratlam in the state of Gujarat a Pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette Notification were made available to the public on the 06/03/2007;
And whereas , the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act submitted his report to the Central Government;
4208
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[PART II-SEC , 3 ( ii )) And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of the publication of thisdeclaration in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances ..
District:-Dahod 「ehsil : -Bariya
Name of Village
Survey No Block No 1
2
MotiZari
192
33
4
4
7
Piplod
234
240
582
571
Panchela
97
89
88
88
88
88
Vathudi
7
Schedule
State:-Gujarat
Area
Sub-Division No.
Are
Hectare
Centiare 3
4
5
6
0
17
53 1+2
0
09
59 1
0
11
05
2
0
28
11 2
07
0
40
0
28
08 1
0
12
14
0
40
23
0
2
20
82 P2
26
83
0
5
0
08
19
1
0
11
16 3
0
10
80 5
0
02
61
0
4
10
00 0
33
30 [ F. No. R- 25011/6/2005- O.R. - I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.
नईदिल्ली, 22 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2068.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन )अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी , भारत के राजपत्र, तारीख 09.12.2007 15.12.2007 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का आ. संख्या 3488 तारीख 15.12.2007 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची तालुका-गोधरा , जिला पंचमहल , राज्य गुजरात में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरशन लिमिटेड, द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी.
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां ता 06/03/2007 से जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी :
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
4209 और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिर्पोट दे दी है ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए;
अंतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में विनिर्दष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की इस तारीख से निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
जिला: पंचमहल तालूका:गोधरा
गाँव का नाम
उपखण्ड सं .
सर्वेक्षण सं खण्ड सं.
1
2
3 गोलाब
311
2
310
P
324
2
266
1
265
P8
265
8
265
P8
1
265
270
1
P1
448
1
449
2B
449
P
538
522
P
3
644
644
1
643
P3
643
2P
642
P2
643
635
632
P2
629
628
1
665
राज्य : गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मिटर हेक्टर
एयर
4
6
5
18
93 0
07
20 0
12 0
24
0
10
08
33 0
05
0
15
12
67 0
00
28 0
08
0
04
98
60 0
18
0
64
08
75
10
0
0
11
70
07
0
35
29
97 0
06
0
90
17
46 0
04 0
01
20
06 0.
82 0
08
30
20
0
48
47
0
12 0
15
00 0
36
11
70 0 4210
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 2 , 2008/SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]
5
6
3
1
2
4
01
08
0
Old173P
223
दहिकोट
10
0
29
Old172/3
229
76
23
0
Old162
218
92
0
07
Old156/3
211
70
11
0
Old155
209
22
05
0
Old47P
70P
02
25
0
47/1P
70P
[फा. सं. आर-25011/7/2005- ओ.आर. - 1 ]
एस. के. चिटकारा, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 22th July, 2008
S. O. 2068.-Whereas by the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry ofPetroleum and Natural Gas S.O. number 3488 dated the 15.12.2007 . issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act . 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands in Tehsil Godhra , District : Panchamahal in the State of Gujarat specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Koyali to Ratlam in the state of Gujarat a Pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette Notification were made available to the public on the 06/03/2007;
And whereas , the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act submitted his report to the Central Government:
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of the publication of this declaration in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .
Schedule
State:-Gujarat
District:-Panchamahal
Tehsil:-Godhara
Area
Sub-Division No.
Survey No /Block No
Name of Village
Centiare
Are
Hectare
6
5
4
3
2
1
93
18
0
2
311
Gollav
20
07
0
P
310
12
24
0
2
324
08
10
0
1
266
33
05
0
P8
265 4211
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
3
2
8
265
Gollav contd...
265
P8
1
265
1
270
P1
448
1
449
449
2B
P
538
P
522
3
644
1
644
P3
643
2
643
642
P
P2
643
635
632
P2
629
628
11
665
Old173P
223
Dahikot
Old172/3
229
Old162
218
Old156/3
211
Old155
209
Old47P
70P
47/1P
70P
नई दिल्ली, 22 जुलाई , 2008 4
5
15
12 0
67
00
0
28 0
08
98
04
0
60
18
0
64 0
08
75
10
0.
70 0
11
35
07
0
29
97. 0
90 0
06
46
17
0
01
04 0
06
20
0
82
08
0
30
20
0
48
47
0
12 0
15
36
00 0
70
11
0
08
01
0
10
29
0
76
23
0
92
07
0
70
11
0
22
05
0
02
25
0
[F. No. R- 25011/7/2005 - O.R. - I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.
का. आ. 2069.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन )अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी , भारत के राजपत्र , तारीख 09.12.2007 15.12.2007 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का. आ. संख्या 3489 तारीख 15.12.2007 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची तालुका-कालोल , जिला पंचमहल, राज्य गुजरात में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के
अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी. और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां ता. 06/03/2007 से जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी : और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा (1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार का रिर्पोट दे दी है.
और केंन्द्राय सरकार का उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए;
अतः , अब, कन्द्राय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 का उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तिया का प्रयाग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में विनिर्दष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।
और कंन्द्राय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करत हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरशन लिमिटेड में सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की इस तारीख से निहित होगा । 4212
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
अनुसूची तालुका:कालोल
[PART II-SEC . 3(ii)]
जिला: पंचमहल
गाँव का नाम
उपखण्डसं.
सर्वेक्षण सं खण्ड सं.
1
2
3 माधबास
111
1
166
P
170
1
101
1P
166
1P
166
P2
211
P2
211+191+193
राज्य: गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टर
वर्ग मिटर
एयर
4
5
6
0
03
13
0
01
80
0
07
06
0
07
47
0
02
81
0
10
08
0
76
14
0
28
P1+ P2, P1,1P
212
1+P2
236
P1+ P2
269
P2
313
जेतपुर
313
308
308
308
308
308
294
109
109
109
109
109
108
108
119
125
125
294
129
129
129
129
129
P2
153
2.
143
2
147
2
147
P1
147
1P कंडाच
451
1
294
3
30
0
01
30
0
45
76
06
0.
83
0
04
32
0
01
50
0
15
12
0
11
70
0
04
68
0
64
08
0
64
08
0
06
12
0
15
97
0
00
90
0
11
52
0
13
94
0
01
89
0
05
10
0
00
03
0
10
17
0
13
05
0
08
10
0
13
50
0
14
40
0
09
72
0
03
60
0
00
68
0
14
85
0
00
18
0
07
44
0
12
24
0
04
05
0
05
72
0
07
77
0
01
01 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 2, 2008/श्रावण11 , 1930
2
3 1
1
295
कंडाच निरतंर ..
P2
295
44
उतरडिया
1+2
2+3
45
94
5
102
3
146
1P
136
1
1194
भ्यासडा
1458
69
भुखि
86
116
113
3P334
112
125
87
2
4
26
फयानसि
41
3
5
44
44
3
3
44
6
2
4
7
2
44
3
44
4
44
2
7
330
Plot20 करेलि
1P21/2
330
330
1P21/3
330
1P
1-21/1/7
330
330
1P
330
4213 4
5
6
94 0
05
76 0
05
02
0
88
32 0
38
10
80 0
07
02 0
03
0
08
42
03
0
0
70
11
0
00
95 0
05
58
42
01
0
12
04
0
10
08
0
0
05
49 0
03
78 0
27
40
10
08
0
02
16
0
41
0
03
0
01
15
00
10
0
68
0
04
0
53
07
10
01
0
-0
09
89
01
81
0
10
62
0
96
0
08
14
12
0
79
0
11.
24
00
0
00
77
0
06
0
12
36
0
08
1PPlot164
1P
330
1P
330
1P
330
1P
330
1P
330
1P
330
1P
330
1P1 .
308
1
309
2
313
1P
330
2745 G1/08-21
15
84
0
0
10
98
07
92
0
07
02
0
76
11
0
:
05
0
04
10
0
08
22
86
0
14
94
0
19
88
0
60
22
0 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008/SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4214
6
5
4
3
2
1
44
19
0
1P
330
करेलिनिरतंर ..
99
09
0
3
320
19
10
0
2
321
72
63
0
1P
330
46
26
0
1Plot226
330
40
23
0
1P
330
44
00
0
330
plot12
88
29
0
1P
330
54
00
0
1P
330
86
13
0
1
330
92
07
0
1P
330
64
17
0
2
256
76
05
0
2/1P2
255
12
60
0
22/1
330
40
14
0
23/1
330
30
01
0
P
330
26
10
0
P
330
26
10
0
P
330
84
28
0
7/3
330
72
09
0
5/2
330
86
13
0
P
330
80
10
0
P
330
40
12
0
P
330.
28
08
0
P
330
22
10
0
P
330
54
0
18
P18/2
330
12
06
0
P18/2
330
66
50
0
2
79
गददरा
56
75
0
3
85
50
01
0
1
87
80
10
0
4
59
40
05
0
3
59
29
15
0
1
18
10
02
0
1
835
80
00
0
.2
801
39
24
0
3
801
14
06
0
5
802
[फा. सं. आर-25011/7/2005- ओ.आर. -1 ]
एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 22th July, 2008
S. O. 2069.-Whereas by the notification of the Government of India , in the Ministry ofPetroleum and Natural Gas S.O. number 3489 dated the 15.12.2007, issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) . the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands in Tehsil Kalol , District: Panchamahal in the State ofGujarat specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Koyali to Ratlam in the state of Gujarat a Pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
4215 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette Notification were made available to the public on the 06/03/2007:
And whereas , the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 ofthe said Act submitted his report to the Central Government;
And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of the publication of thisdeclaration in the indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances.
Schedule
Tehsil: -Kalol
District:-Panchamahal
State:-Gujarat
Area
Survey No /Block No Sub- Division No.
Name of Village
Hectare Are Centiare 1
2
3
4
5
6
111
1
0
13
03
Madhvas
166
P
0
01
80
170
1
0
07
06
101
1P
07
47
0
166
02
81
1P
0
166
10
P2
0
08
14
211
P2
0
76
0
30
28
211+191 +193
P1+ P2.P1.1P
212
1+P2
01
30
0
236
0
45
76
P1+P2
269
P2
0
06
83
313
P
04
32
0
Jetpur
313
0
50
01
12
15
308
0
PPP
11
308
0
70
P
308
04
68
0
64
308
P1 /1
0
08
64
308
0
08
12
06
294
0
15
97
0
109
90
00
0
109
52
109
P/1
0
11
109
0
94
1,3
109
0
01
89
10
05
108
0
00
0
03
108
17
10
0
119
13
05
125
0 4216
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008/SRAVANA 11 , 1930
1
2
125
3P Jetpur Cont
2P
294
P
129
129
PP
129
P
129
P2
129
2
153
2
143
2
147
P1
147
1P
147
1
451
Kandach
3
294
1
295
1
P2
295
1+2
44
Utarediya
2+3
45
5
94
3
102
1P
146
1
136
1194
Vyasda
1458
69
Bhukhi
86
116
113
4
112
125
2
87
4
26
Fansi
3
41
44
5
3
44
3
44
2
6
4
7
2
44
3
44
4
44
2
7
Plot20
330
Karoli
1P21/2
330
1P21/3
330
1P
330
1-21/ 1/7
330
1P
330
1PPlot 164
330
1P
330
1P
330
1P
330
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 4
6
5
10
0
08
13
50
0
40
14
0
72
09
0
60
0
03
68
00
0
14
85
0
00
18
0
44
07
0
24
12
0
04
0
05
72
05
0
77
07
0
0
01
94
05
0
76
05
0
02
88
0
32
38
0
80
10
0
02
07
0
08
03
0
42
03
0
70
11
0
95
00
0
58
0
05
42
01
0
12
04
0
10
08
0
49
05
0
78
03
0
40
27
0
10
08
0
02
16
0
41
03
0
01
15
0
10
00
0
68
04
0
53
07
0
10
01
0
89
0
09
81
01
0
62
10
0
96
08
0
14
12
0
79
11
0
24
00
0
77
00
0
06
12
0
36
08
0
84
15
0
98
10
0
92
07
0 भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
2
1
3 ip
330
Karoli Con ..
330
1P
1P
330
330
1P
1P1
308
1
309
2
313
330
1P 1P d
330
3
320
321
2
1P
330
1Plot226
330
1P
330
330
plot12
1P
330
1P
330
1
330
1P
330
2
256
2/1P2
255
22/1
330
23/1
330
P
330
330
P
P
330
7/3
330
5/2
330
330
P
P
330
P
330
330
330
PP
330
P18/2
P18/2
330
2
79
Adadara
3
85
1
87
4
59
3
59
1
18
1
835
2
801
3
801
5
802
4217
6
4
5
02
07
0
76
11
0
04 0
05
10 0
08
22
86 0
14
0
94 0
19
88
60 0
44
19
09
99 0
10
19 0
72
63
0
26
46
0
40
23
0
44
0
00
88
0
29
54
0
00
0
86
13
07
92
0
0
17
64
76
05
0
60
12
0
40
14
0
30
01
0
26
10
0
26
10
0
84
28
0
72
09
0
86
13
0
80
10
0
40
12
0
28
0
08
22
10
0
54
18
0
12
06
0
66
50
0
56
75
0
50
01
0
10
80
0
40
0
05
29
15
0
10
02
0
00
80
0
39
24
0
14
06
0
[F. No. R-25011/7/2005- O.R. - I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.
4218
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008/SRAVANA 11 , 1930
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 22 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2070.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी , भारत के राजपत्र, तारीख 09.12.2007 15.12.2007 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का, आ . संख्या 3490 तारीख 15.12.2007 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची तालुका-हालोल , जिला पंचमहल, राज्य गुजरात में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी.
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां ता. 06/03/2007 से जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिर्पोट दे दी है;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए:
अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपन्नाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में विनिर्दष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की इस तारीख से निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
जिला: पंचमहल तालूका:हालोल
उपखण्ड सं.
गाँव का नाम
सर्वेक्षण सं खण्ड सं.
3
2
1
215/1+2
2354
कंजेरि( चंद्रपुरा )
2344
203P/1
214/1 + 2+ 3 +4
2345
4
209
3P
208
P
2317+2316
P
2316+2317
216/1
2355
2
216
224
2356
P/235/2
2360
242/2
2365
2
225
1495
232
1
233
राज्य: गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
एयर वर्ग मिटर हेक्टर
6
4
5
29
0
88
11
10
0
25
83 0
27 0
1
98 0
10
10 17
0
84 0
15
80 19
0
18
0
18
35
58 0
32 22
0
6
48
0
21
96 0
64 17
0
96
21
0 4219
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण11 , 1930
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
5
6
4
3
५.
03
85
0
P3
78
मुबाला
82
34
P
0
78
10
00
2+ 2
0
106
37
03
0
1+P2
102
00
16
0
2P
111
0
29
88
2+1
108
68
43
0
1+2+3
109
[फा. सं. आर-25011/7/2005- ओ.आर. - 1 ]
एस. के. चिटकारा, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 22th July, 2008
S. O. 2070.-Whereas by the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S.O. number 3490 dated the 15.12.2007 . issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act . 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government declared its intentionto acquire the right of user in the lands in Tehsil Halol , District: Panchamahal in the State ofGujarat specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Koyali to Ratlam in the state of Gujarat a Pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette Notification were made available to the public on the 06/03/2007:
And whereas , the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act submitted his report to the Central Government:
And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired:
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of the publication of this declaration in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances.
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 4220
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008/SRAVANA 11 , 1930
Schedule
State:-Gujarat
District:-Panchamahal
Tehsil:-Halol
Area
Sub-Division No.
Survey No/Block No
Nameof Village
Are Centiare
Hectare
6
4
5
3
2
1
88
0
29
215/1 + 2
2354
Kanjari( Chandrapura)
11
10
0
2344
203P/1
83
25
0
214/1+2+3 +4
2345
27
1
0
4
209
10
98
3P
0
208
10
17
0
P
2317+2316
84
0
15
P
2316+2317
80
0
19
216/1
2355
18
0
18
2
216
58
0
35
224
2356
22
32
0
P/235/2
2360
6
48
0
242/2
2365
96
21
0
2
225
64
17
0
1495
232
96
1
21
233
0
03
85
0
P3
78
Muwala
82
0
34
P
78
10
00
0
2+2
106
37
03
0
1+P2
102
16
0
00
2P
111
29
88
0
2+1
108
68
43
0
1+2+3
109
[ F. No. R- 25011/7/2005 - O.R. - I ]
S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 22 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2071.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी , भारत के राजपत्र, तारीख 09.12.2007 15 12.2007 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का आ . मंख्या 3493 तारीख 15.12.2007 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची तालुका- घोघंबा जिला पंचमहल, राज्य गुजरात में कोयली से रतलाम तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी.
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां ता. 06/03/2007 से जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ; और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिर्पोट दे दी है;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए:
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में विनिर्दष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की इस तारीख से निहित होगा । 4221
भारत का राजपत्र: अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
अनुसूची
जिला: पंचमहल
तालूका :घोघंबा
उपखण्ड सं.
गाँव का नाम
सर्वेक्षण सं खण्ड सं.
3
2
1
1
8
दामबाव
2/1
115
67
1P
1.
118
37
1P
91
1P
8
1P9
91
1P16
91
1 सिमलिया
181
P
699
P
699
699
699
699
699
699
699
699
699
699
699
699
699
699
99
99
88
108
108
108
108
108
83
82
61
61
699
699
699
699
699
2745 G1/08-22
राज्य: मुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मिटर हेक्टर
एयर
6
5
4
40
0
05
25
38
0
03
52
0
18
90
0
32
33
0
94
0
05:
50
0
04
82
17
0
..66
0
15
12
60
0
24
30
0
52
0
20
0
28
20
70
02
0
60
0
03
30
0
15
10
0
26
21
0
01
78
03
0
00
0
09
46
09
0
70
05
0
60
10
0
50
13
0
58
0
05
00
0
09
01
20
0
40
05
0
40
01
0
80
00
0
72
09
0
04
14
0
07
02
0
50
0
13
01
17
0
80
11
0
23
-00
0
90
0
18
00
90
0
20
16
0
30
06
0
29
0
08 4222
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008/SRAVANA 11 , 1930
1
2
3
P
699
सिमलिया निरतंर ..
2
651
652
703
708
702
699
699
699
699
699
699
699
699
699
P35
144
P
1P
140
P2
140
140
P
140
P
P4
100
P4
100
P4
100
100
P5
99
PP P
99
22
खिलेडी
23
3
17
11
1
12.
2
12
159
4
2
159
1
158
2
158
3
158
P
169
4
147
4
146
2
159
4
137
3
137
2
137
1
137
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
6 4
5
03
05
0
74
07
0
01
40 0
09
24 0
00
01
0
10
20
0
08
64 0
37 0
09
52
11
0
00
98 0
92 0
07
60 21
0
22
83 0
0
01
65
18
0
15
0
10
98
28 0
08
20
07
0
0
64
08
62
0
10
03
96
0
12
06
0
66
06
0
20
0
12
06
0
66
0
06
33
0
19
06
84
0
10
85
0
74
25
0
10
35
0
76
23
0
13
50
0
50
05
0
84
24
0
42
12
0
13
86
0
76
14
0
32
58
0
85 0
13
02
0
10
40
0
05
40
0
05
06
08
0
40
05
0
30
0
06 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4223
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
1
2
खिलेडी निरतंर ..
138
138.
3PP-
139
139
140
140
2A
123
122
P2UP.-
121
85
शेरपुरा
85
85
PPP
59
1P2
59
1P
60
P
61
47
P2
47
1P
43
2
4
26
19
1
189
6
189
3 4
6
5
0
06
30 0
09
00 0
18
28 0
00
35
47 0
07
70 0
11
0
23
91 0
19
80 0
44
15
0
12
06
0
14
58 0
09
54 0
01
17 0
21
25 0
12
78 0
00
90
76 0
05
0
03
96
01
0
82
02
00 0
07
47 0
0
24
02
07
0
01 [फा. स. आर-25011/7/2005-ओ.आर. - 1] एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 22th July, 2008
S. O. 2071.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry ofPetroleum and Natural Gas S.O. number 3493 dated the 15.12.2007 , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the lands in Tehsil: Ghoghamba , District : Panchamahal in the State of Gujarat specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Koyali to Ratlam in the state of Gujarat a Pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas, the copies of the said Gazette Notification were made available to the public on the 06/03/2007; And whereas, the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 ofthe said Act submitted his report to the Central Government; And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 4 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of the publication of this declaration in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances.
4224
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
Schedule
State:-Gujarat
Tehsil:-Ghoghamba District: -Panchamahal
Area
Sub- Division No.
Survey No/Block No
Name of Village
Are Centiare
Hectare
6
5
4
3
1
2
40
05
0
8
1
Damvav
38
25
0
2/1
115
52
03
0
1P
67
90
0
18
1
118
33
32
0
37
94
05
0
1P
91
50
04
0
1P
8
82
17
0
1P9
91
66
15
0
1P16
91
60
12
0
1
181
Semaliya
30
24
0
P
699
52
20
0
P
699
28
20
0
P
699
70
02
0
P
699
60
03
P
0
699
30
15
0
P
699
10
26
0
P
699
21
01
P
0
699
78
03
0
P
699
00
09
0
P
699
46
09
0
P
699
70
05
0
P
699
60
10
0
P
699
50
13
0
P
699
58
05
0
P
699
00
09
0
P
99
20
01
0
P
99
40
05
0
P
88
40
01
0
P
108
00
80
0
P
108
72
09
0
108
14
04
0
108
07
02
0
108
50
13
0
83
17
01
0
82
80
11
0
2P
61
00
23
0
61
90
18
0
699
90
00
0
699
20
16
0
699
30
06
0
699
29
08
0
P
699 भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1
2
3P
699
Semaliya Con...
2
651
652
703
708
702
699
699
699
699
699
699
699
699
P35
699
144
P
140
1P
P2
140
140
P
140
P
100
P4
100
P4
100
P4
100
P5
99
P
P
99
22
Khilodi
23
3
17
11
1
12
2
12
4
159
2
159
1
158
2
158
3
158
P
169
4
147
4
146
2
159
4
137
3
137
2
137
1
137
4225
6
4
5
03
05
0
74
07
0
40 01
0
24 0
09
01
00
0
10
20
0
64
08
0
37
0
09
11
52 0
00
98
0
92
0
07
60
21
0
83
0
22
65
01
0
18
15
0
98
10
0
28
08
0
20
0
07
64
0
08
62
10
0
96
0
03
12
06
0
66
0
06
20
07
0
12
06
0
66
06
0
33
19
0
06
84 0
10
85
0
74
25
0
35. 0
10
76
23
0
50
0
13
05
50
0
24
84
0
42
0
12
0
13
86 14
76
0
58
32
0
85
13
0
02
10
0
40
0
05
40
05
0
08
06
0
40
05
0
06
30
0 4226
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
2
1
Khilodi Con ..
138
138
3PP-
139
139
140
140
2A
123
122
121
85
Sherpura
85
85
P2P..PPP
59
1P2
59
1P
60
P
61
47
P2
47
1P
2
43
26
4
19
1
6
189
3
189
[PART II-SEC . 3( ii )]
6 4
5
0
30
06
00 0
09
18
0
28
35 0
00
07
47 0
70
11
0
23
91 0
80 0
19
44 0
15
0
06
12
14
58 0
54 0
09
0
01
17
25 0
21
12
78 0
90
00
0
76
05
0
03
96 0
82 0
01
00
0
02
47
0
07
02
24
0
01
07
0
[F. No. R-25011/7/2005- O.R. -I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 24 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2072.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि लोक हित में यह आवश्यक है कि मथुरा- भरतपुर पैट्रोलियम उत्पाद परिवहन परियोजना के कार्यान्वयन हेतु राजस्थान राज्य के जिला भरतपुर के गुंध रारह गांव से राजस्थान राज्य के जिला भरतपुर के जघीना गांव में स्थित भरतपुर मार्केटिंग टर्मिनल तक पैट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए; :
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उक्त भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है:
: कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको, भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के भीतर पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के लिए , श्री. योगेश कुमार श्रीवास्तव, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ( राजस्थान), इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन्स विभाग, 33 एवं 281 , मुक्तानंद नगर नजदीक, गोपालवुरा बाईपास, जयपुर-302018 , राजस्थान को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 4227
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
अनुसूचि
राज्य- राजस्थान
जिला -भरतपुर
क्षेत्रफल
तहसील
गांव का नाम सर्वे / ब्लाक नं.
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टेयर
एयर
3
1
2
4
6
5
रारह
946
00
07
02
कुम्हेर
947
00
05
04
949
02
60
00
950
'00
02
40
00
04
951
50
00
05
952
00
1046
00
02
80
00
1047
02
60
1053
00
03
69
00
00
1052
24
00
05
20
1098/3737
00
1111
06
00
1100
01
00
60
1110
00
01
60
1101
00
00
10
1108
03
00
00
1103
00
03
90
321
00
03
30 भरतपुर
उंध रारह
317
00
05
60
427
05
20
00
00
426
05
00
00
493
05
10
00
03
78
490
00
491
00
96
489
00
60
02
488
00
04
00
487
02
00
90
486
02
00
00
482
00
01
00
485
00
02
90
02
40
00
505.- सरकारी भूमि
515
00
01
00
516
00
04
80
517
00
01
10
519
00
03
20
518
00
00
20
522
00
05
00
537
00
50
01
538
00
03
36
539
00
04
80
03
542
80
00 4228
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
तहसील
गांव का नाम सर्वे / ब्लाक नं.
हेक्टेयर
4 1
2
3
00
543
भरतपुर
दुध रारह
550
00
(जारी)
00
551
560
00
561
00
562
00
00
563
37
शहनावली
00 भरतपुर
36
00
35
00
143
00
00
138
137
00
147
00
148
00
222
00
223
00
00
241
240
00
236
00
238
00
00
237
317
00
300
00
00
302
301
00
303
00
299
00
305
00
304
00
306
00
312
00
365
00
364
00
361
00
369
00
371
00
405
00
404
00
406
00
407
00
402
00
403
00
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर एयर
5
6
40
05
20
03
03
90
03
10
10
03
04
76
00
80
04
00
05
80
04
20
05
50
04
30
04
00
05
70
05
40
08
30
03
00
60
03
03
00
05
00
15
00
00
15
00
80
04
40
00
28
16
00
00
96
02
88
01
02
02.
16
06
30
06
80
02
16
02
00
05
56
02
30
05
40
03
78
04
50
00
94
00
10
03
60
06
60 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008 / श्रावण 11 , 1930 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
गांव का नाम सर्वे / ब्लाक नं.
तहसील
हेक्टेयर
4
3
1
2
00
400
भरतपुर
00
399
शहनावली (जारी)
00
6
धोरमई
भरतपुर
00
5
00
10
00
18
00
21
00
22
00
4229 क्षेत्रफल
वर्ग मीटर एयर
6
5
70
06
30
03
80
01
80
02
00
03
40
02
40
05
10
04
01
10
57.- सरकारी भूमि
00
58
00
168
00
170
00
162
00
192
00
161
00
193
00
194
00
195
00
200
00
210
00
212
00
219
00
222
00
220
00
221
00
226
00
225
00
320
00
322
00
316
00
323
00
315
00
324
00
314
00
301
00
300
00
302
20
04
20
06
00
06
70
02
00
01
10
00
10
04
20
04
10
00
00
04
60
04
10
04
76
05
20
01
00
01
00
02
60
05
10
02
10
05
00
03
10
00
40
03
10
00
02
52
96
00
34
02
60
00
30
03
60
00
सरकारी भूमि
00
295-
00
276
00
277
00
274
00
278
00
281
2745 G1/08-23
20
06
10
03
00
10
60
04
60
01 4230
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
तहसील
गांव का नाम सर्वे / ब्लाक नं.
1
2
3
282 भरतपुर
283
धोरमई (जारी)
285
जघीना
913 भरतपुर
915
916
917
918
920
919
924
922
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
एयर
वर्ग मीटर 4
5
6 00
06
40 00
05
20 00
05
70 00
03
80 00
00
20 00
02
88 00
00
24 00
60
00
00
GO
56 00
02
32 00
01
05 00
02
60
04
10 00
1424-सा निविय
2481
2480
2483
2479
2474
2475
2461
2462
2450 00
01
30 00
01
20 00
00
72 00
04
40 00
02
80 00
05
20 00
05
00 00
00
48 00
00
24 [फा. सं. आर-25011/2/ 2008 - ओ.आर. - 1 ] एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 24th July, 2008
S. O. 2072.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that " Mathura- Bharatpur Spur Pipeline system " for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Rundh Rarah village in the Bharatpur District of the state of Rajasthan to Bharatpur Marketing Terminal in the Jaghina Village of Bharatpur District in the state of Rajasthan , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And , whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid , and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4231 भारत काराजपत्र : अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Yogesh Kumar Shrivastava , Competent Authority (Rajasthan ) , Indian Oil Corporation Limited ( Pipelines Division ) , 33 & 281 , Muktanand Nagar, Near Gopal Pura Bye Pass, Jaipur -302018 , Rajasthan .
SCHEDULE
State: - Rajasthan
District: - Bharatpur
Area
Tehsil Name of Village Survey/Block/No.
Hectare
Are
Sq .Mtr .
4
3
5
6
1
2
07
02
00
946
Kumher
Rarah
05
04
947
00
60
00
02
949
02
00
40
950
50
04
00
951
00
05
952
00
02
80
00
1046
02
60
00
1047
00
69
1053
03
00
24
00
1052
20
1098/3737
00
05
00
06
00
1111
00
01
60
1100
60
01
00
1110
10
00
00
1101
00
00
03
1108
03
90
00
1103
00
03
30
321
Bharatpur Rundh Rarah
60
00
05
317
20
427
00
05
00
00
05
426
10
493
00
05
00
03
78
490
96
00
00
491
60
489
00
02
00
00
488
04
02
00
90
487
00
02
00
486
00
01
00
482 4232
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008/SRAVANA 11 , 1930
Survey/Block/No.
Tehsil Name of Village
Hectare 1
3
2
00
485
Rundh Rarah
Bharatpur
00
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Area
Are
Sq .Mtr.
5
6
90
02
40
02
505- Govt. Land
(contd.)
00
515
516
00
00
517
00
519
00
518
00
522
00
537
538
00
00
539
542
00
00
543
550
00
00
551
560
00
00
561
00
562
00
563
37
00 Sahnavali
Bharatpur
36
00
00
35
00
143
00
138
00
137
147
00
00
148
222
00
223
00
00
241
00
240
236
00
238
00
00
237
317
00
300
00
302
00
301
00
303
00
299
00
00
01
04
80
10
01
20
03
20
00
00
05
01
50
36
03
04
80
80
03
40
05
20
03
03
90
10
03
10
03
76
04
00
80
00
04
80
05
20
04
50
05
30
04
00
04
70
05
40
05
30
08
03
00
60
03
03
00
05
00
15
00
00
15
00
80
04
40
00
28
00
16
00
96
02
88 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930 Tehsil Name of Village Survey/Block/No .
Hectare 1
2
3
4
305
00 Bharatpur
304
00 Sahnavali (contd.)
306
00
312
00
365
00
00
364
361
00
369
00
371
00
405
00
404
00
406
00
407
00
402
00
403
00
00
400
00
399
6
00 Dhormai
Bharatpur
5
00
10
00
18
00
21
00
00
22
00
4233 Area
Are
Sq. Mtr .
5
01
02 02
02
16
30
06
06
80
02
16
02
00
05
56
02
30
05
40
03
78
04
50
00
94
00
10
60
03
98
88
03
30
80
01
80
02
03
00
02
40
40
05
10
04
01
10
- Gout Land
57
00
58
00
168
170
00
162
00
00
192
00
161
00
193
194
00
195
00
200
00
210
00
212
00
00
219
222
00
220
00
221
00
226
00
225
00
20
04
06
20
00
06
02
70
01
00
10
00
10
04
04
20
00
10
04
00
04
60
10
04
05
76
01
20
00
01
00
02
05
60
02
10 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008/SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4234
Name of Village Survey/Block/No .
Tehsil
Hectare
4 2
1
00
3 320
Bharatpur
00
322
Dhormai (contd.)
00
316
00
323
00
315
00
324
00
314
00
301
300
00
302
00
00
[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Area
Are
Sq .Mtr.
6
5
10
05
03
00
00
10
40
03
10
00
52
02
96
00
34
02
60
00
03
30
60
00
295- Govt, Land
00
276
277
00
274
00
00
278
281
00
282
00
283
00
285
00
913
00 Bharatpur Jaghina
915
00
916
00
00
917
918
00
920
00
919
00
924
00
922
00
P.W.D.
1424
00
2481
00
2480
00
2483
00
2479
00
2474
00
2475
00
2461
00
2462
00
00
2450
20
06
03
10
00
10
60
04
60
01
06
40
05
20
05
70
03
80
00
20
02
88
00
24
00
60
00
56
02
32
01
05
02
60
04
10
01
30
01
20
00
72
04
40
02
80
05
20
05
00
00
48
00
24
[ F. No. R-25011/2/ 2008- O.R. - I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.
4235 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
AWARD
श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई, 2008
TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 37/2007 IR (C- I ) Central Government Dt . 18-2-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action of the management ofModiluft/ Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Rajesh Kumar , Electrician w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ?"
का. आ. 2073.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या -11 ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 95/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -11012/37/2007- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 18-2-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within a period of three months .
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim. Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
It appears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given.
Date : 19-6-2008
S.O. 2073. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 95/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई, 2008
[No. L - 11012/37 / 2007 - IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
का. आ. 2074.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या- II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 96/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
I.D. No. 95/2008
[सं. एल-11012/36/2007- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी IN THE MATTER OF :
New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
Claimant
Sh. Rajesh Kumar , S/o Sh . Krishan Lal Singh , C/ o Sh . P.L. Srivastava , CB - 280 , Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi - 110 028
Versus
S.O. 2074. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 96/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. II, New Delhi now as shown in the annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s Spice JetLtd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/36/2007 - IR ( C - I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
Respondent
The General Manager , M/s . Spice Jet Limited, Plot No. 319, Phase- IV , Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon , Haryana 4236
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai, Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 96/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh . Sanjay Kumar ,
Claimant S/o Sh. Jai Singh, C/ o Sh. P.L. Srivastava, CB-280, Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi - 110 028
Versus
The General Manager,
Respondent M/s. Spice Jet Limited, PlotNo. 319, Phase - IV , Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon, Haryana
AWARD
TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 36/2007 IR (C- I ) Central Government Dt. 18-2-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication:
The point runs as hereunder :
"Whether the action of the management of Modiluft/ Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services ofSh. Sanjay Kumar , Loader w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ?"
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 18-2-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within aperiod of three months.
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim. Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far.
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
It appears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
Nodispute award is given.
Date : 19-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2075. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या- II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 98/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/41/2007- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 2nd July , 2008
S.O. 2075. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref . No. 98/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/41 /2007- IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT- II , NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 98/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Claimant Sh. Satpal Singh , S/o Sh . Hari Charan , C/ o Sh . P.L. Srivastava, CB-280 , Ring Road, Naraina , New Delhi - 110 028
Versus
Respondent The General Manager , M/ s. Spice Jet Limited, Plot No. 319 , Phase - IV , Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon, Haryana
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 41/2007 IR (C- I ) Central Government Dt . 18-2-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
4237
भारत का सजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
The point runs as hereunder:
"Whether the action of the management ofModiluft/ Royal Airways /Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh. Satpal Singh, Loader w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ."
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 18-2-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within a period of three months .
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
Itappears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given .
Date : 19-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2076.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या- II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 97/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -11012/35/2007- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 2nd July , 2008
S.O. 2076. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 97/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s Spice Jet Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/35/2007 - IR ( C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer 2745 G1/08-24
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- II , NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 97/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh. Sudama Kumar ,
Claimant S/o Sh . Raghunath, C/o Sh. P.L. Srivastava , CB-280, Ring Road, Naraina , New Delhi - 110 028
Versus
The General Manager ,
Respondent M/s . Spice Jet Limited , Plot No. 319, Phase- IV, Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon, Haryana
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 35/2007 - IR ( C - I ) Central Government Dt . 18-2-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
The point runs as hereunder :
"Whether the action of the management of Modiluft/ Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh. Sudama Kumar , Loader w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? Ifnot, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ?"
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 18-2-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within a period of three months .
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
Itappears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given.
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer Date : 19-6-2008 4238
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
The point runs as hereunder :
नई दिल्ली , 2 जुलाई, 2008
"Whether the action of the management ofModiluft/ Royal Airways/ Spicejet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Gopal Dutt Gawari , Security Guard w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date. " का. आ. 2077.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . मोदिलुफ्त/रॉयल एयरवेज स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या- II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 87/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ सं . एल-11012/18/2007- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 31-2-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within a period of three months .
New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far.
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
Itappears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
S.O. 2077.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 87/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s Modiluft/ RoyalAirways / Spice Jet Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
No dispute award is given .
Date : 19-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer [No. L- 11012/ 18/2007 - IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
नई दिल्ली , 2 जुलाई , 2008
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 87/2008
का. आ. 2078.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. मोदिलुफ्त रॉयल एयरवेज/स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या- II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 86/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh . Gopal Dutt Gawari ,
[सं. एल-11012/20/2007- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी C/ o Sh . P.L. Srivastava, CB-280 , Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi - 110 028
Claimant
New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008 Versus
The General Manager ,
M/ s . Spice Jet Limited, Plot No. 319 , Phase- IV, Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon, Haryana
.. Respondent
AWARD
S.O. 2078.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 86/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s Modiluft/ Royal Airways/ Spice Jet Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/20/ 2007 - IR ( C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 18/2007 - IR ( C - I ) Central Government Dt . 31-1-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008 / श्रावण 11 , 1930
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 86/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh . Chanchal Singh,
S/ o Sh . Bishan Singh ,
C/ o Sh . P.L. Srivastava , CB- 280 , Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi - 110 028
... Claimant
Versus
The General Manager ,
M/ s . Spice Jet Limited , Plot No. 319 , Phase - IV , Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon , Haryana
Respondent
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 20/2007 - IR (C - I) Central Government Dt . 31-1-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
The point runs as hereunder :
"Whether the action of the management of Modiluft/ Royal Airways / Spicejet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Chanchal Singh , Helperw.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? Ifnot, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ?"
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 31-2-2008. The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within a period of three months .
Noticewas sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
It appears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given.
Date : 18-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2079. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . स्पाइस जेट
4239 लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या- II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 85/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/21/2007- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ]
स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
4 S.O. 2079 .-- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref . No. 85/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M / s Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/21 /2007 - IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT - II ,
NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 85/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh . Babu Sharma ,
S/ o Sh . R.B. Sharma , C/ o Sh . P.L. Srivastava , CB-280 , Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi - 110 028
Claimant Versus
The General Manager, M/ s . Spice Jet Limited, Plot No. 319 , Phase- IV, Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon , Haryana
Respondent AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 21/2007 IR- ( C - I) Central Government Dt . 31-1-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
The point runs as hereunder :
"Whether the action of the manageinent ofModiluft/ Royal Airways/ Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Babu Sharma, Helper w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ?" [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4240
The General Manager ,
Respondent
M/s . Spice Jet Limited, Plot No. 319, Phase- IV , Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon, Haryana,
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 31-1-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within a period of three months .
AWARD
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 13/2007 - IR (C - I ) Central Government Dt . 31-1-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication:
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
The point runs as hereunder :
It appears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given.
Date : 18-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई , 2008
"Whether the action of the management ofModilu Royal Airways / Spicejet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh. Prem Raj Singh , Loader w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ?"
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 31-1-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within a period of three months .
का. आ. 2080.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. मोदिलुफ्त/रॉयल एयरवेज /स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या- II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 84/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , -30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far.
[सं. एल -11012/13/2007- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is onlythree months .
Itappears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case.
No dispute award is given.
Date: 18-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई , 2008
S.O. 2080.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 84/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofM/ s Modiluft/ RoyalAirways / Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/ 13/2007 - IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
का. आ. 2081.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. मोदीलुफ्त/ रॉयल एयरवेज स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 83/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer I.D. No. 84/2008
[सं. एल -11012/10 /2007- आई आर ( सी -1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी IN THE MATTER OF :
New Delhi , the 2nd July , 2008
Claimant
Sh . Prem Raj Singh , C/ o Sh . P.L. Srivastava , CB -280 , Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi - 110 028
Versus
S.O. 2081.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 83/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii) ]
4241
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . Modiluft/Royal Airways /Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L - 11012/ 10/2007 - IR ( C- I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 83/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh . Tulsi Ram Sharma ,
S/ o Sh. Rishi Ram Sharma , C/ o Sh . P.L. Srivastava, CB- 280, Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi- 110028
Claimant
Versus
... Respondent The General Manager , M/s Spice Jet Limited, Plot No. 319 , Phase - IV , Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon , Haryana
AWARD
TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 10/2007 - IR (C - I) Central Government dt. 31-1-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
The point runs as hereunder :--
"Whether the action of the management of Modiluft/ Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Tulsi Ram Sharma , Peon w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ?" Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 31-1-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within a period of three months .
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far.
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months.
Itappears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given .
Date : 18-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2082.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. मोदीलुफ्त/ रॉयल एयरवेज/ स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 82/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-11012/14/2007- आई आर ( सी- I ) ]
स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
S.O. 2082.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 82/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s. Modiluft/Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/14/ 2007 - IR (C -I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 82/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh . Ashok Kumar, S/ o Sh . Man Singh , C/ o Sh . P. L. Srivastava , CB-280, Ring Road, Naraina , New Delhi - 110028
Claimant
Versus
M/ sSpice Jet Limited,
The General Manager , Plot No. 319 , Phase - IV , Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon ,
Respondent Haryana 4242
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 14/2007 - IR ( C - I) Central Government dt . 31-1-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action of the management of Modiluft/ Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Ashok Kumar , Sweeper w.e.f. 31-5-2001 is justified and legal ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ."
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 31-1-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with direction to decide the case with in a period of three months .
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
It appears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given .
Date: 18-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2083.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . मोदीलुफ्त/ रॉयल एयरवेज/स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 80/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/11/2007- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ] ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 80/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh . Muni Lal , S/o Sh . Bhagwandin , CB -280 , Ring Road , Naraina, New Delhi - 110028
Claimant
Versus
The General Manager , M/s Spice Jet Limited, Plot No. 319, Phase- IV , Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon , Haryana. Respondent
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 11/2007 - IR ( C - I ) Central Government dt . 31-1-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication:
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action of the management ofModiluft/ Royal airways / Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Muni Lal , Helper w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ? "
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 31-1-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with direction to decide the case within a period of three months .
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far.
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
It appears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given.
Date : 18-6-2008
S.O. 2083. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 80/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Modiluft/Royal Airways /Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/ 11 / 2007 - IR ( C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2084.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. मोदीलुफ्त/ रॉयल एयरवेज/स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और [ भाग II- खंड 3 (ii ) ]
4243
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 81/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -11012/12/2007- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
S.O. 2084.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 81/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . Modiluft/Royal Airways /Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/ 12/2007 - IR (C - I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT - II, NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer 1.D. No. 81/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Claimant Sh . Net Ram, C/ o Sh . P. L. Srivastava , CB - 280 , Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi - 110028
Versus
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 31-1-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with direction to decide the case within a period ofthree months .
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
It appears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given.
Date : 18-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2085.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. मोदीलुफ्त/ रॉयल एयरवेज/ स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 91/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -11012/ 8/2007- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 2nd July , 2008
S.O. 2085. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 91/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Modiluft/Royal Airways /Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/ 8/ 2007 - IR (C- I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
.. Respondent
The General Manager , M/ sSpice Jet Limited, Plot No. 319 , Phase- IV , Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon, Haryana
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 12/2007 - IR (C - I) Central Government dt. 31-1-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action of the management of Modiluft/ Royal airways/ Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Net Ram , Loader w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ? "
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT- II , NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer I.D. No. 91/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh . Ajit Singh , C/ o Sh . P. L. Srivastava , CB- 280 , Ring Road, Naraina , New Delhi - 110028
Claimant
Versus 4244
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVAΝΑ 11 , 1930
Respondent The General Manager , M/sSpice Jet Limited, Plot No. 319 , Phase - IV, Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon, Haryana
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 8/2007 - IR (C - I) Central Government dt . 31-1-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication:
The point runs as hereunder :--
"Whether the action ofthe management ofModiluft/ Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh. Ajit Singh , Welder w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ?"
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 31-1-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with direction to decide the case with in a period of three months .
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
It appears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given .
Date : 19-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2086.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . मोदीलुफ्त/ रॉयल एयरवेज/स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 93/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-11012/9/2007- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
S.O. 2086. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 93/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s. Modiluft/Royal Airways/ Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/9/2007 - IR ( C - I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 93/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh . Rambir Singh ,
S/o Sh . Prabhu Dayal , C/o Sh . P. L. Srivastava , CB - 280 , Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi - 110028
Claimant
Versus
The General Manager , M/ sSpice Jet Limited , Plot No. 319 , Phase- IV , Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon , Haryana
Respondent
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 9/2007 - IR ( C - I) Central Governmentdt . 31-1-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action of the management of Modiluft/ Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh. Rambir Singh, Driver w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ? "
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 31-1-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within aperiod of three months .
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim. Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
4245
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
It appears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case.
No dispute award is given.
Date : 19-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2087.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . मोदीलुफ्त/ रॉयल एयरवेज/स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 94/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-11012/28/2007- आई आर ( सी-I ) ] स्नेह लता, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
S.O. 2087.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 94/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Modiluft/Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/28 /2007- IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
PRESENT :
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 94/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh . Dev Kumar ,
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 28/2007 - IR ( C - I ) Central Governmentdt . 18-2-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication:
The point runs as hereunder :--
"Whether the action of the management ofModiluft/ Royal Airways /Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Dev Kumar , Peon w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ?"
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 18-2-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within aperiod of three months .
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
It appears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given .
Date : 19-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2088.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. मोदीलुफ्त/ रॉयल एयरवेज/ स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 92/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/16/2007- आई आर ( सी -1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
... Claimant
S/ o Sh . Sohan Lal , C/ o Sh . P. L. Srivastava , CB -280 , Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi - 110028
Versus
The General Manager ,
S.O. 2088. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref . No. 92/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . Modiluft/Royal Airways/Spice Jet Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/16/2007 - IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
Respondent
M/ s Spice Jet Limited , Plot No. 319 , Phase - IV, Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon , Haryana
2745 GI/08-25 4246
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
PRESENT :
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 92/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh. Sanjeev Khanna ,
Claimant S/ o Sh. Krishan Gopal Khanna , C/ o Sh . P. L. Srivastava , CB- 280, Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi - 110028
Versus
The General Manager ,
Respondent M/ s . Spice Jet Limited , Plot No. 319 , Phase - IV , Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon , Haryana
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L - 11012/ 16/2007 - IR ( C - I ) Central Governmentdt . 31-1-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication:
The point runs as hereunder :
"Whether the action of the management of Modiluft/ Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh. Sanjeev Khanna , Field Worker w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ? " Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 31-1-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within a period of three months .
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
It appears that the workman is not interested in contesting the casc .
No dispute award is given .
Date : 19-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2089.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. मोदीलुफ्त/रॉयल एयरवेज/स्पाईस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या II ) , नई दिल्ली केपंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 90/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -11012/15/2007- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ]
स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 2nd July , 2008
S.O. 2089.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref . No. 90/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Modiluft/Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/ 15/ 2007 - IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
PRESENT :
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 90/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh . Rajesh Kumar ,
Claimant C/o Sh . P. L. Srivastava , CB- 280 , Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi- 110028
Versus
Respondent The General Manager , M/s. Spice Jet Limited, Plot No. 319 , Phase - IV , Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon, Haryana
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L - 11012/ 15/2007 - IR ( C - I ) Central Government Dt . 31-1-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication:
4247
अगस्त 2, 2008 / श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र
ANNEXURE
The point runs as hereunder :-
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
"Whether the action of the management ofModiluft/ Royal Airways /Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Rajesh Kumar , Security Guard w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ? "
I.D. No. 89/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh . Sundar ,
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 31-1-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within a period of three months .
C/ o Sh . P.L. Srivastava,
CB-280 , Ring Road , Naraina ,
Claimar
New Delhi - 110028
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 & 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
Versus
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
M/s. Spice Jet Limited ,
The General Manager , Plot No. 319 , Phase- IV ,
Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon ,
Itappears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
Respondent
Haryana
No dispute award is given .
AWARD
Date : 19-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer.
नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई , 2008
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 17/2007 - IR (C - I ) Central Government Dt . 31-1-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action of the management of Modiluft/ Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Sundar, Loader w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ?"
का. आ. 2090.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. मोदीलुफ्त/रॉयल एयरवेज/स्पाईस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या- II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 89/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/17/2007- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 2nd July , 2008
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 31-1-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within aperiod of three months .
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 & 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
Itappears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
S.O. 2090.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 89/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s. Modiluft/Royal Airways/Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
No dispute award is given .
Date : 19-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer [No. L- 11012/ 17 / 2007 - IR ( C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer [PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4248
The point runs as hereunder:-
नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई , 2008
"Whether the action ofthe management of Modiluft/ Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Mohan S. Lal , Security Officer w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ? " का. आ. 2091.-- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. मोदीलुफ्त/राँयल एयरवेज /स्पाईस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 88/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/19/2007- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 31-1-2008. The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within a period of three months .
New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 & 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
It appears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case.
No dispute award is given .
S.O. 2091. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 88/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Modiluft/Royal Airways /Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
Date : 19-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer [No. L- 11012 /19/2007 - IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई, 2008
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 88/2008
का. आ. 2092.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. मोदीलुफ्त रॉयल एयरवेज/स्पाईस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 110/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
IN THE MATTER OF :
[सं. एल -11012/42/2007- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी Sh . Mohan S. Lal ,
New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
Claimant
S/o Sh . Shibu Lal , C/ o Sh . P.L. Srivastava , CB- 280 , Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi- 110028
Versus
Respondent
The General Manager , M/ s . Spice Jet Limited , Plot No. 319 , Phase - IV , Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon , Haryana
AWARD
S.O. 2092. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref . No. 110/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Modiluft/Royal Airways /Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012 /42/2007 - IR ( C - I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 19 /2007- IR (C - I ) Central Government Dt. 31-1-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
भारत का राजपत्र [ भाग II- खंड 3 (ii ) ]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT- II , NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 110/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh. Rajbir,
S/ o Sh . Haricharan ,
Claimant C/ o Sh . P.L. Srivastava , CB-280 , Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi - 110028
Versus
The General Manager ,
Respondent M/s. Spice Jet Limited , Plot No. 319 , Phase - IV, Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon , Haryana
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 42/2007 - IR (C - I) Central Government Dt . 18-2-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication:
The point runs as hereunder:----
"Whether the action ofthe management ofModiluft/ Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh. Rajbir , Sweeper w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? Ifnot, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ?"
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 18-2-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within a period of three months .
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 & 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
Itappears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given .
Date : 19-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2093.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. मोदीलुफ्त/रॉयल
4249
अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
एयरवेज/स्पाईस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 109/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -11012/43/2007- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 2nd July , 2008
S.O. 2093. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 109/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Modiluft/Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L - 11012/ 43/ 2007 - IR ( C - I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 109/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh . Sunil Kumar ,
S/ o Sh . Ramesh ,
Claimant C/ o Sh . P.L. Srivastava , CB- 280 , Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi - 110028
Versus
The General Manager ,
M/s. Spice Jet Limited , Plot No. 319 , Phase - IV , Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon ,
Respondent Haryana
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 43/2007 IR ( C - I ) Central Government Dt . 18-2-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
The point runs as hereunder : -
"Whether the action of the management ofModiluft/ Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Sunil Kumar, Helper w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not , to what 4250
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ?"
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 18-2-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within a period of three months .
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not . filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 & 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
It appears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given .
Date : 19-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2094.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . मोदीलुफ्त/रॉयल एयरवेज/स्पाईस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या- II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 108/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/40/2007- आई आर ( सी -1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
S.O. 2094. In pursuancesuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 108/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Modiluft/ Royal Airways/ Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[ No. L - 11012/40/2007 - IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - II, NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] I.D. No. 108/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh . Rajpal ,
C/ o Sh . P.L. Srivastava ,
CB - 280 , Ring Road , Naraina ,
Claimant New Delhi - 110028
Versus
The General Manager ,
M/ s . Spice Jet Limited, Plot No. 319 , Phase- IV ,
Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon ,
Respondent Haryana
AWARD
TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 40/2007 IR (CM - I ) Central Government Dt . 18-2-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
The point runs as hereunder :--
"Whether the action of the management ofModiluft/ Royal Airways /Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Rajpal , Loader w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ?"
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 18-2-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within a period of three months .
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 & 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far.
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
It appears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given .
Date : 19-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2095.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . स्पाईस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 107/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/34/2007- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी [भाग II- खंड 3 (ii ) ]
4251
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
New Delhi , the 2nd July , 2008
S.O. 2095.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 107/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/34/2007 - IR (C - I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
PRESENT :
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 107/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Claimant Sh. Raghubir, S/ o Sh . Sohan Lal , C/ o Sh . P.L. Srivastava , CB -280 , Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi - 110028
Versus
The General Manager ,
M/s..Spice Jet Limited, Plot No. 319, Phase - IV , Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon, Haryana
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim. Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
It appears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given .
Date : 19-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2096.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. मोदीलुफ्त/रॉयल एयरवेज/स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या- II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 112/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 02-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/39/2007- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 2nd July , 2008
S.O. 2096.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 112/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofM/s. Modiluft/ Royal Airways /Spice Jet Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/ 39/ 2007 - IR ( C- I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
Respondent
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its Letter No. L- 11012/ 34/2007 IR (C - I ) Central Government Dt . 18-2-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action of the management of Modiluft/RoyalAirways / Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi indismissing the services of Sh . Raghubir, Loader w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ? "
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 18-2-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT- II, NEW DELHI
PRESENT :
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 112/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh . Shambu Singh ,
S/ o Sh . Rameshwar Singh ,
C/o Sh . P.L. Srivastava ,
CB -280 , Ring Road , Naraina ,
Claimant New Delhi - 110028
Versus 4252
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
Respondent The General Manager , M/s . Spice Jet Limited, Plot No. 319 , Phase - IV, Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon , Haryana
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 39/2007 - IR ( C - I ) Central Government Dt . 18-2-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
The point runs as hereunder :--
"Whether the action of the management ofModiluft/ Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Shambhu Singh , Engineering Technician w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ? " Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 18-2-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within a period of three months .
Noticewas sent on 05-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 05-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-06-2008 . Ithas not been filed so far.
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
It appears that the workınan is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given.
Date : 19-06-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2097.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . स्पाईस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या- II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 106/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 02-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/47/2007- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ]
स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
S.O. 2097.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 106/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Spice JetLtd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/47/2007 - IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
PRESENT :
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 106/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Claimant Sh. Shahid Galib Patel , S/o Sh . Md. Iqbal Patel , C/ o Sh . P.L. Srivastava , CB -280 , Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi - 110028
Versus
The General Manager , M/ s . Spice Jet Limited, Plot No. 319 , Phase- IV , Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon ,
Respondent Haryana
AWARD
TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 47/2007 - IR ( C - I ) Central Government Dt . 18-2-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action ofthe management ofModiluft/ Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Shahid Galib Patel , Electrician w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ? "
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 18-2-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within a period of three months.
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim. Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
4253
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]
Itappears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given.
Date: 19-06-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2098.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या- II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 105/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 02-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/29/2007- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
S.O. 2098. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref . No. 105/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . Spice JetLtd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/29/2007 - IR (C- I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT - II,
NEW DELHI
PRESENT :
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 105/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh. Satish Kumar Tyagi , S/o Sh. Tek Ram Tyagi , C/ o Sh . P.L. Srivastava , CB-280, Ring Road, Naraina ,
Claimant New Delhi - 110028
!
Versus
The General Manager,
AWARD
TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 29/2007 - IR (C- I) Central Government dtd. 18-2-2008 has referredthe following point for adjudication:
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action of the management ofModiluft/ Royal Airways/ Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Satish Kumar Tyagi, Driverw.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ? "
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 18-2-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within a period of three months .
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far.
The statutory period for disposal of such cases-is only three months .
Itappears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given.
Date : 19-06-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2099.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947(1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. मोदीलुफ्त रॉयल एयरवेज/स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय (संख्या.- II ) , नईदिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 104/2008) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -11012/46/2007- आई. आर (सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
S.O. 2099. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 104/2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . Modiluft/Royal Airways /Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008.
Respondent
M/s . Spice Jet Limited, Plot No. 319 , Phase - IV , Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon, Haryana
2745 G1/08-26
[No. L- 11012/46/2007- IR (C-1) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, DeskOfficer. " 4254
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
PRESENT :
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 104/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Claimant Sh. Jagdev Singh , S/ o Sh. Jimi Singh , C/ o Sh . P.L. Srivastava , CB-280 , Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi - 110028
Versus
The General Manager ,
M/sSpice Jet Limited , PlotNo. 319 , Phase - IV ,
Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon ,
Respondent Haryana
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L - 11012/ 46/2007 - IR (C- I) Central Government dtd . 18-2-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action of the management ofModiluft/ Royal Airways /Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Jagdev Singh , Driver w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ? "
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 18-2-2008. The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within aperiod of three months .
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
Itappears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given.
Date : 19-06-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2100.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. मोदीलुफ्त/ रॉयल एयरवेज /स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या.- II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 103/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -11012/45/2007- आई. आर. ( सी- I ) ]
स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 2nd July , 2008
S.O. 2100.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 103/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . Modiluft/Royal Airways/Spice Jet Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L - 11012/45/ 2007 - IR ( C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
PRESENT :
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 103/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh. Laxmi Narayan ,
S/ o Sh . Raj Singh , C/o Sh . P.L. Srivastava, CB- 280 , Ring Road , Naraina ,
Claimant New Delhi - 110028
Versus
The General Manager ,
M/sSpice Jet Limited, Plot No. 319 , Phase- IV, Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon , Haryana
Respondent
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 45/2007 IR (C - I) Central Government dtd . 18-2-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication:
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action ofthe management ofModiluft/ Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Laxmi Narayan , Security Guard w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii) ]
4255
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
I.D. No. 102/2008
legal ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ? "
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh . Satbir Singh ,
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 18-2-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case within aperiod of three months .
S/ o . Sh . Gulab Singh , C/ o . Sh. P.L. Srivastava, CB -280, Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi - 110028
Claimant
Versus
Noticewas sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim. Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
The General Manager , M/ s. Spice Jet Limited, Plot No. 319 , Phase- IV , Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon ,
Haryana.
Respondent It appears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
AWARD
Nodispute award is given .
Date : 19-06-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer
TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 44/2007 - IR (C -I) Central Government dtd. 18-2-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई, 2008
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action of the management ofModiluft/ Royal Airways/ Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Satbir Singh , Security Guard w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ?"
का. आ. 2101.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. मोदीलुफ्त/रॉयल एयरवेज स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय (संख्या. - II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 102/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 18-2-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with a direction to decide the case with in a period of three months .
[सं. एल -11012/44/2007-आई . आर. ( सी -1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
Itappears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
No dispute award is given.
Date : 19-06-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer S.O. 2101.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 102/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Modiluft/Royal Airways /Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
नई दिल्ली , 2 जुलाई, 2008
[No. L- 11012/44/2007- IR (C- I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
का. आ. 2102.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. मोदीलुफ्त/रॉयल एयरवेज स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या- II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 101/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । PRESENT :
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
[सं. एल-11012/33/2007- आई. आर. ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी 4256
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
S.O. 2102.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 101/2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. II, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Modiluft/Royal Airways/ Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/33/2007- IR (C- I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM -LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
PRESENT :
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 101/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh. Sanjay,
C/ o . Sh . P.L. Srivastava , CB-280 , Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi - 110028
Claimant
Versus
The General Manager , M/ s . Spice Jet Limited , Plot No. 319 , Phase - IV, Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon, Haryana.
Respondent
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 33/2007 - IR ( C- I ) Central Government dtd . 18-2-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action of the management ofModiluft/ Royal Airways/ Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Sanjay , Loader w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal ? If not, to what relief isthe concerned workman entitled and from which date ?"
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 18-2-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman, by registered post with direction to decide the case with in a period of three months .
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim. Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
It appears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case.
No dispute award is given.
Date : 19-06-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2103.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या- II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 100/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/32/2007 - आई. आर. ( सी- I ) ]
स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 2nd July, 2008
S.O. 2103. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 100/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Spice JetLtd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/32/ 2007 - IR ( C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
PRESENT :
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 100/2008
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh. Manoj Kumar,
S/ o Sh . Srichand ,
C/o Sh . P.L. Srivastava,
CB -280 , Ring Road , Naraina , New Delhi - 110028
Claimant
Versus 4257 [भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
TheGeneral Manager,
in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Spice JetLtd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 2-7-2008 .
M/s. Spice Jet Limited, Plot No. 319, Phase - IV , Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon, Haryana
Respondent
AWARD
[No. L- 11012/31 /2007 - IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
The Ministry of Labour by its Letter No. L- 11012/ 32/2007 - IR (C - I ) Central Government Dt. 18-2-2008 has referred the following point for adjudication :
The point runs as hereunder :-
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT - II, NEW DELHI
PRESENT :
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 99/2008
"Whether the action of the management of Modiluft/ Royal Airways/ Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh. Manoj Kumar, Driver w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal? Ifnot, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ?"
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh. Chander Bhan ,
S/o Sh . Kinnu Ram,
C/o Sh . P.L. Srivastava ,
CB -280 , Ring Road, Naraina ,
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 18-2-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with direction to decide the case with in a period of three months .
Claimant
New Delhi - 110028
Versus
The General Manager ,
Noticewas sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008, 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
M/s. Spice Jet Limited, Plot No. 319, Phase- IV , Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon ,
Respondent
Haryana
It appears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case .
AWARD
No dispute award is given.
Date : 19-06-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 31/2007 IR (C- I ) Central Government dt. 18-2-2008 has referredthe following point for adjudication :
नई दिल्ली, 2 जुलाई , 2008
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action of the management of Modiluft/ Royal Airways/Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi in dismissing the services of Sh . Chander Bhan , Sweeper w.e.f. 1-1-2002 is justified and legal? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ?"
का. आ. 2104.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. स्पाइस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या. II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 99/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/31/2007- आई. आर. ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी
Notice through registered post has been sent to the workman on reference dated 18-2-2008 . The Ministry of Labour has also sent intimation to the workman by registered post with direction to decide the case with in a period of three months .
New Delhi , the 2nd July , 2008
Notice was sent on 5-2-2008 for filing claim . Claim was not filed on 5-2-2008 , 30-5-2008 and 13-6-2008 . It has not been filed so far .
The statutory period for disposal of such cases is only three months .
S.O. 2104. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 99/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4258
APPEARANCES :
It appears that the workman is not interested in contesting the case.
Onbehalf of the
: Mr. D.K. Verma ,
Advocate
Employers
No dispute award is given.
Onbehalf of the
Date : 19-06-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer
: Mr. Vijay Paswan, concerned workman
Workmen
नई दिल्ली, 3 जुलाई, 2008
State : Jharkhand
Industry: Coal
Dated: Dhanbad, 9th June , 2008
AWARD
का. आ. 2105.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. आई.आई.एस. सी.ओ. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ( संख्या II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 158/2001/94 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1)(d) of the I.D Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/226/ 99 - IR(C- 1 ) dated the 20th December, 1999.
SCHEDULE
[सं. एल-20012 /226/99- आई . आर. ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 3rd July, 2008
"Whether the action of the management of Jitpur Colliery of IISCO in dismissing Shri Bijay Paswan from the services of the company on the ground of long unauthorized absence is justified? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled ?"
S.O. 2105. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 158/2001/94 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . IISCO Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 3-7-2008 .
The record is put up in the Lok Adalat. Both the parties named above are present and files a settlement petition under their signature . Perused the settlement petition and heard both side . The settlement appears to be fair, proper and in accordance with the principle ofnatural justice.Accordingly the said settlement petition is accepted and an Award is passed in terms therefore which forms part of the Award as annexure .
[No. L- 20012/226/ 99 - IR ( C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDENCY OFFICER LOK ADALAT CGIT NO . 2 DHANBAD
BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT AT THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) , DHANBAD
Ref. No. 158/2001
PRESENT :
Shri Nagendra Kumar, Presiding Officer
Employer in relation to the management of Jitpur Colliery of M/s . IISCO Ltd.
AND
Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947
Reference No. 158 of 2001
PARTIES :
Their workmen The humble petition on behalf of management as well as workman for settlement of dispute through LOK ADALAT
Most respectfully shweth :
Employers in relation to the management Jitpur Colliery ofM/ s . IISCO Ltd.
AND
1. that the workman concern namely Vijay Paswan was dismissed from the service of the company with effect from 16-10-95.
Their workmen 4259 [ भाग II- खंड 3( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
the employers in relation to the management of M/ s : TISCO Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 3-7-2008 .
2. that during the hearing of the above reference, the workman concerned approached the management for settlement of the dispute through Lok Adalat .
3. That both the parties settled their dispute on following terms of settlement.
[No. L- 20012/ 2/2004 - IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer ANNEXURE
Terms of Settlement
A. that the management agreed to reinstate the workman concerned without back wages .
BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT AT THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) , SHRAM BHAWAN , MURLINAGAR, DHANBAD
PRESENT :
B. that the workman concerned will not get any wages from date of dismissal till the date of resumption ofduty.
Shri Nagendra Kumar, Presiding Officer C. the period of idleness i.e. from date of dismissal to the date of resumption of duty will be treated as dies-non.
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D.Act, 1947 Reference No. 54 of 2000
PARTIES:
D. that the management is . agreed to maintain continuityofservice for payment of gratuity only .
Itistherefore prayed that your honour may kindly pass award in terms of above settlement.
AND
Employers in relation to the management M/ s.TISCO Ltd. AND Their workmen .
For this both the parties shall ever pray.
APPEARANCES :
Sd/-
Onbehalfofthe employers : Mr. D. K.Verma , Advocate
Onbehalf of the workmen
Illegible Sr. Mgr . ( P& A) (C &J) SAIL , ISP
: Mr. Anant Saw , Workman Signature of the management representative
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal Sd/- Vijay Paswan
Signature of the workman.
Dated, Dhanbad , the 9th June , 2008 AWARD
नई दिल्ली, 3 जुलाई, 2008
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 (1) (d) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/ 2/2004- IR (C - I ) dated the 26th April , 2004.
SCHEDULE
का. आ. 2106.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. टी.आई.एस.सी.ओ.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. II, धनबाद के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 54/2000/87 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-20012/2/2004- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 3rd July, 2008
" क्या राष्ट्रीय कोलियरी मजदूर संघ की मैसर्स टिस्को के प्रबंधतंत्र से मांग कि कर्मकार श्री अनन्त सॉ ट्रामर को 12-10-99 से11-1-2000 की अवधि के लिए, जब वे दुर्घटनाग्रस्त होकर अवकाश पर थे, पूरा वेतन व भत्ते दिए जाएं उचित एवं न्यायसंगत है ? यदि हाँ तो कर्मकार किस राहत के पात्र हैं ? "
The record is put up in the Lok Adalat. Both the parties named above are present and filed a settlement petition under their signature . Perused the settlement petition and heard both side . The settlement appears to be fair , proper and in accordance with the principle of S.O. 2106.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 54/2000/87) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court No. II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008 / SRAVAΝΑ 11 , 1930
4260
both the parties have agreed to settle the case fully and finally on the following terms and conditions:
natural justice . Accordingly the said settlement petition isaccepted and Award is passed in terms thereof which forms part of the Award as annexure .
TERMS OF SETTLEMENT
NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer
ANNEXURE
FORM 'H '
[Rule 58 of Industrial Disputes (Central ) Rules , 1957]
That Sri Anant Saw will be paid Rs . 20,000 (Rupees Twenty Thousand) only as full and final payment against his claim made in the ID towards the wages for the period he remained on sick arising out of injury sustained by him at the end of the ' B ' shift on 11-10-1999 while going to Sijua Colliery Cap Lamp Cabin for returning the cap lamp.
FORM FOR THE MEMORANDUM OF SETTLEMENT
NAMES OF PARTIES :
Representing Management :
That, the settlement shall be treated as full and final in respect of all claims arising out of the industrial dispute referred above and no other claim shall be made by Sri Anant Saw or any other person/union on his behalf, upon the Management in this regard payment of Rs . 20,000 (Rupees Twenty Thousand) only will be made within 10 days .
1. Sri P. K. Pattanayak, Chief (HR/IR) , M /s . Tata Steel Ltd. , P.O. Jamadoba , Distt . Dhanbad (Jharkhand)
2. Sri Rajpal Sinha, Sr. Manager ( HR/IR) , M/s . Tata Steel Ltd. , P.O. Jamadoba , Distt . Dhanbad , (Jharkhand)
Representing Workman :
That, the parties shall jointly file a copy of this settlement before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2, Dhanbad through Lok Adalat with a prayer to treat the above referred industrial dispute mutually resolved and for giving an award in terms thereof.
1. Sri Anant Saw , Ex . P.No. 205769 , Ex . Trammer , Sijua Colliery .
SHORT RECITAL OF THE CASE
In acceptance of the terms and conditions of this Memorandum of Settlement , both the parties have given their signatures to this Memorandum of Settlement on the 3rd May, 2008 .
Onbehalf of the Workman
Onbehalf of
Tata Steel Limited
Sd/-
Sd/-
(Anant Saw)
(P. K. Pattanayak)
Ex-Trammer,
Ex. P. No. 205769
SijuaColliery
Chief (HR/IR) , M/s. Tata Steel Ltd. P. O. Jamadoba, Dist. Dhanbad (Jharkhand)
Sd/-
(Rajpal Sinha)
Anindustrial dispute was raised under Section 2A ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 before the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central) , Dhanbad - I alleging therein that Sri Anant Saw, Ex. P. No. 205769 , Ex- Trammer of Sijua Colliery was not paid wages for the period he remained sick due to injury sustained by him on 11-10-99 . It was contended that Sri Saw had sustained injury in his right hand wrist, in a road accident on 11-10-99 , while going from 2 Pit Sijua to Sijua Colliery Cap Lamp Cabin to return the cap lamp at the end of his shift. Itwas claimed that he was entitled to get full payment ofwages for the period he remained on sick due to said injury . The matter was seized into conciliation and due to divergent views of both the parties , the conciliation ended into failure .
Sr. Manager (HR/ IR ) ,
P. O. Jamadoba ,
Dist. Dhanbad
M/ s. Tata Steel Ltd. (Jharkhand)
WITNESS
Sd/- Consequent upon failure of conciliation the matter was referred by Government of India , Ministry of Labour, New Delhi vide Order No. L- 20012/2 / 2004 - IR (C - I) dated 26-4-2004 to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2, Dhanbad for adjudication and numbered as Ref . Case No. 54/2004 . While the matter is pending before the Hon ble Tribunal , the concerned Ex - Employee , Sri Anant Saw, approached the management for settling the case .
(Anup Kumar Ghosh)
Sd/-
(Md. Saluddin)
Jamadoba
3rdMay, 2008
The matter was discussed at length on several occasions and finally today i.e. 3rd May 2008 wherein [भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 3 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2107.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै.सी.सी.एल.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. II , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 272/2001/86 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-20012/358/2001- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 3rd July, 2008 S.O. 2107.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 272/2001/86) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court No. II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s CCL Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 3-7-2008 .
[No. L- 20012 /358 /2001 - IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) , SHRAM BHAWAN , MURLINAGAR, DHANBAD PRESENT :
Shri Nagendra Kumar , Presiding Officer In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1 ) (d) of the I.D.Act . , 1947 Reference No. 272 of 2001
PARTIES:
Employers in relation to the management M/s. Central Coal Ltd.
AND Their workmen .
APPEARANCES :
On behalf of the employers : Mr. K. K. Singh ,
4261
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008 / श्रावण 11 , 1930
10 (1) (d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/358/ 2001 - IR (C- 1 ) dated the 24th September , 2001.
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action ofthe management of Sarubera colliery of M/ s . CC Ltd. in stopping two annual increment of Sri Dwarika Singh, Clerk Gr . I on the ground ofnegligence of duty is justified ? Ifnot, to what relief is the workman concerned entitled ?" The record is put up in the Lok Adalat . Both the parties named above are present and filed a settlement petition under their signature . Perused the settlement petition and heard both side . The settlement appears to be fair, proper and in accordance with the principle of natural justice . Accordingly the said settlement petition isaccepted and an Award is passed in terms thereof which forms part of the Award as annexure .
NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LOK ADALAT , C. G. I. T. NO . 2, DHANBAD Ref. No. 272/2001
Employer in relation to the Management of Sarubera Colliery of M/ s . CCL .
AND
Their workmen .
The humble petition on behalf of management as well as the workman for settlement of the dispute through Lok Adalat.
Mostrespectfully shweth :
1. That the workman concerned namely Dwarika Singh, Clerk Gr . I was chargesheeted for commission of misconduct and after holding departmental enquiry his two annual increments was stopped with cumulative effect by the management on the proved charges .
PM ( R - L) / HQ
CCL
Onbehalf of the workmen : Sri Dwarika Singh, Workman .
State : Jharkhand
Industry: Coal Dated, Dhanbad, the 9th June , 2008 AWARD
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 2745 G1/08-27
2.That during the hearing the workman concerned approached the management for settlement of the dispute through Lok Adalat .
3. That both the parties settled their dispute on following terms of settlement.
TERMS OF SETTLEMENT
(a) That the management has agreed to reconsider the punishment of the workmen if the workmen submit an appeal to the appellate authority within 30 days from the date of award.
4262
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
(b) That the management will dispose of the appeal within 30 days from the date of receipt of the appeal.
(c) That the management has agreed to take a considerate view over the appeal.
Signature of the Management's Representative
Sd/-
(K. K. SINGH ) /PM ( IR - L) /HQ, CCL
Signature of the workman (DWARIKA SINGH)
Date : 9-6-08 नई दिल्ली, 3 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2108.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. आई. आई. एस. सी. ओ. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. II, धनबाद के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 242/2001/88 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-20012/673/97- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 3rd July, 2008
S.O. 2108. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref . No. 242/2001/88 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. II , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s IISCO Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 3-7-2008 .
[No. L- 20012/673 / 97 - IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
TRIBUNAL ( NO . 2) , SHRAM BHAWAN , MURLINAGAR , DHANBAD
PRESENT :
Shri Nagendra Kumar, Presiding Officer Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1 ) (d) of the I.D.Act, 1947 Reference No. 242 of 2001
PARTIES:
Employers in relation to the management ofJitpur Colliery of M/ s . IISCO
AND
Theirworkmen
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] APPEARANCES :
Onbehalfofthe employers : Mr. D. K. Verma , Advocate
On behalf of the workmen : Sri Kaushal Kishore Singh and Sufal Bauri , workman
State : Jharkhand
Industry: Coal Dated, Dhanbad, the 9th June , 2008
AWARD
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunał for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/673/97- IR (C- 1 ) dated the 25th July, 2001 .
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Jitpur colliery of IISCO in dismissing Sri Sufal Bauri and Sri Kaushal Kishore Singh , from the services ofthe company on the ground of long unauthorised asbence is justified ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled ?"
The record is put up in the Lok Adalat . Both the parties named above are present and filed a settlement petition under their signature . Perused the settlement petition and heard both side . The settlement appears to be fair, proper and in accordance with the principle of natural justice. Accordingly the said settlement petition isaccepted and an Award is passed in terms thereof which forms part of the Award as annexure .
NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDENCY OFFICER, LOK ADALAT, C. G. I. T. NO. 2, DHANBAD Ref. No. 242/2001
Employer in relation to the Management of Jitpur Colliery of M/s . IISCO Ltd.
AND
Their workmen.
The humble petition on behalf of management as well as workmen for settlement of dispute through Lok Adalat.
Mostrespectfully shweth
1. That the workman concerned namely Sri Sufal Bauri and Sri Kaushal Kishore Singh were dismissed from the service of the company with effect from 16-10-95 for long absenteeism .
4263 [भाग II-खंड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रवण 11 , 1930
2. That during the hearing of the above reference, theworkmenconcerned approached the management for settlement of the dispute through Lok Adalat .
Tribunal/Labour Court No. 2 , Dhanbad now as shown in the annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s BCCL Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 3-7-2008 .
3. That both the parties settled their dispute on following terms of settlement .
TERMS OF SETTLEMENT
[No. L- 20012/ 200/2004- IR ( C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
(a) that the management agreed to reinstate the workmen concerned without back wages .
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD
(b) that the workmen concerned will not get any wages from the date of dismissal till the date of resumption ofduty.
PRESENT :
Shri Nagendra Kumar, Presiding Officer (c) theperiod ofidlelness i.e. from date of dismissal to the date of resumption of duty will be treated as dies-non .
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 .
(d) that the management agreed to maintain continuityofservice for payment ofgratuity only.
Reference No. 45 of 2005
PARTIES :
It is therefore prayed that your honour may kindly pass award in terms of above settlement.
AND
Employers in relation of the management of Kusunda Area of M/ s . BCCL and their workman .
For this both the parties shall ever pray .
APPEARANCE :
Sd/-
Onbehalf of the Workman : Mr. S. N. Ghosh , Advocate Signature of the Management's Representative
Sd/-
State : Jharkhand
Onbehalf of the Employers : Mr. U.N. Lal , Advocate Industrial : Coal .
Signature of the workmen
Dated , Dhanbad, the 6th June , 2008
AWARD
Sd/-
(1) सुफल बाउरी
Sd/- (2) Kaushal Kumar Singh
नई दिल्ली, 3 जुलाई , 2008
The Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour and Employment in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947- has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide . their Order No. L-20012/200/2004 - I.R. ( C- 1 ) , dated the 31stMarch , 2005.
SCHEDULE
का. आ. 2109.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी.सी. सी.एल.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय संख्या -2 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 45/2005/81 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
"Whether the demand of the Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union from the management of BCCL, Kusunda Area that the date ofbirth of Sri R.B. Singh , Tracer , may be corrected as 1-6-54 instead of 1-4-1945 is justified ? If so, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled ?"
[सं. एल-20012 /200/2004- आई आर (सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 3rd July, 2008
S.O. 2109.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 45/2005/81 ) of the Central Government Industrial
2. The case of the concerned workman R.B. Singh in short is that he was a permanent employee of Khas Kusunda Colliery in the capacity of Tracer bearing P.N. No. 00670000 and I.D. Card No. 229193. He was issued a Service excerpt in the year 1987 giving details including the date of birth of the concerned workman as 1-6-1954 which was signed by the Manager of the Unit. This shows 4264
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
that the management is fully aware of this date of birth of the concernedworkman as per statutory records . The date ofbirth of the concerned workman is also recorded in the Form B Register as 1-6-54. He was issued I.D. Card No. 229193 on 17-1-1991 by the Dy . P, M , Kusunda area mentioning his date ofbirth, as 1-6-54 . Later he was issued another I.D. Card in which the column of date of birth was blank . Much before retirement vide letter dated 17-10-2000 the concerned workman requested the management to record his date of birth as 1-6-1954 in the Form B Register of Khas Kusunda Colliery in which the date of birth has been recorded as 1-6-1945 but the management did not pay any heed on the request of the concernedworkman . In the C.M.P.F. record of R. B. Singh the date ofbirth is also recorded as 1-6-54 . Due to different entries in the record of the company the case should have been referred to the appropriate Medical Board for assessment of age or to accept the date of birth as indicated by the Company in the year 1987 vide Service Excerpt. Denying the above situation the management has illegally and arbitrarily superannuated the concerned workman w.e.f. 31-5-2005 . The concerned workman has raised an I.D. into the matter of age dispute which was registered on 22-5-03 in the office of the ALC( C)-5 which ended in failure andwhich was ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal. Prayer has been made to pass an Award directing the management to continue the services of R.B. Singh with full back wages for the period which the management forced him to remain out of service with consequential benefits.
3. On behalf of the management W.S.- cum- rejoinder has been filed stating therein that in the Form B Register at Sl . No. 274 the details of the concerned workman is available in which there is date of birth mentioned as 1-6-45 and the date of appointment as 31-1-1973 which has been duly authenticated by the concerned workman R.B. Singh . In the Service Excerpt issued in the year 1987 the date of birth was indicated as 1-6-54 and date of appointment was mentioned as 31-1-73 but there is no basis for the same . This indicates that the above entry does not tally with the entry of the FormB Register of initial place ofposting where the date of birth was clearly mentioned as 1-6-1945 which has beenduly authenticated by the concerned workman. This date ofbirth has to be taken as final which is also available in EDP. The claim of date of birth as 1-6-54 is without any basis or contradictory to the statutory record. The demand of the union is not just, fair and reasonable and supported by the statutory record of the company and as such the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief.
4. In the rejoinder portion it has been stated that the contents ofpara-4 , 7, 8, 11 , 12 , 13 , 16 of the W.S. of the concerned workman is not correct . However , about para- 3 , 5 , 6 , 9 and 10 it has been said that the same is
[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii)] without any basis . The statement made in para - 2 is a matter in record . In the rejoinder portion it has been stated that how the claim of the concerned workman as stated in the W.S. is not correct and misleading . Prayer has been made that the demand of the union for correcting the date ofbirth of he concerned workman as 1-6-54 instead of 1-6-45 is not justified and thus the concerned workman is not entitled for any relief and to pass an Award accordingly.
5. Points to be Decided
"Whether the demand of the Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union from the management of BCCL, Kusunda Areathat the date of birth of Sr. R.B. Singh , Tracer , may be corrected as 1-6-54 instead of 1-4-1945 is justified ? If so , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled ?"
6. On behalf of the concerned workman he has himself examined as WW- 1 . On his behalf copy of I.D. Card, Copy of Service Excerpt have been marked as Ext. W- 1 and W- 2 respectively. Copy of representation of the concerned workman has been marked as Ext . W- 3 with objection. On behalf of the management Rajib Kumar Mishra , MW - 1 has been examined. Photo copy of the L.P.C. is Ext . M - 1 with objection . I.D. Card register has been marked as Ext. M- 2 with objection . New Form B Register prepared on 20-1-90 is Ext . M - 3 with objection . The original Form B Register Ext . M - 4 , notice of retirement Ext . M - 5 have been brought on record on behalf of the management.
7. The concerned workman was an employee ofthe management of BCCL and he joined his service on 31-1-73 has not been disputed . The matter relates only to the dispute of date of birth recorded in different documents.
8. Ld. Lawyer for the concerned workman has submitted that the actual date of birth of the concerned workman is 1-6-54 which has been recorded in different statutory documents though a dispute has been raised with his date of birth as 1-6-54 but the same is wrong and accordingly the date of birth of the concerned workman should be treated as 1-6-54 instead of 1-6-45 .
9. On the other hand Ld . Lawyer for the management has vehemently submitted that the original Form B Register when the concerned workman joined the services contains his date of birth as 1-6-45 and not as 1-6-54. As per law it is this date of birth which has to betaken into consideration and on this basis he was given notice of retirement and the concerned workman has retired from service . He has further submitted that all other documents are prepared at the initial stage on the basis of original . Form B Register when the concerned workman joined the service . If there is any discrepancy in Service Excerpt or in any other document that can not be relied on as all such types of documents are prepared on the [भाग II-खंड 3 (ii) ]
4265
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
denied that all entries in Form B.Register were made and thereafter he had signed in the Form B Register at the initial place of posting at Khas Kusunda Colliery.
basis of entries made in original Form B Register . So far.. as entry of date of birth as 1-6-54 in Service Excerpt is concerned the same is without any basis, He has further submitted that in this view of the matter the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief.
11. From the evidence of this witness it appears that on the basis of the entries made in the I.D. Card entries were made in the original Form B Register. From evidence it further appears that the entries were not complete when he had signed the original Form B Register which was prepared at the initial place of posting . However , from his evidence it appears that in different documents i.e. in I.D. Card Register , I.D. Card Service Excerpt and P.F. document hisdate ofbirth has been recorded as 1-6-54 . From his further evidence it appears that he came to know in 2000 that is date ofbirth has been mentioned as 1-6-45 instead of 1-6- 54 and then he submitted his application for necessary correction by Ext. W-3 though objection has been raised. As far as Ext. W- 1 is concerned, from perusal of the back portion it appears that date of birth has been mentioned as 1-6-54 . Ld. Lawyer for the management has explained that there is difference of ink and this appears to have been issued fromKusunda Area and not from Kusunda Colliery where he was initially appointed. Other submissions will be examined at the stage while scrutinising the evidence of MW.
10. On the question of dispute the evidence ofthe concernedworkman is that he had joined BCCL on 31-1-73 at Khas Kusunda Colliery as Chairman. His I.D. Card register was prepared and his date of birth is recorded as 1-6-54 . The Form B Register was prepared after preparation of I.D. Card Register. In the Form B Register onlythe name was filled up and the employees were asked to put signature and other details were to be filled up from I.D. Card Register. Thereafter he was transferred from Khas Kusunda Colliery to Kusunda Area. In that L.P.C. his date of birth was recorded as 1-6-54. The same was called for but the management has not filed the L.P.C. When he was transferred to Kusunda Area his Form B Register was also filled up there . In that Form B Register his date of birth has been mentioned as 1-6-54 . The management also did not file the Form B Register of Kusunda Area which was called for . In 1987 Service Excerpts of all BCCL employees were prepared including his case also . In his Service Excerpt the date of birth is mentioned as 1-6-54 . The management also did not furnish the Service Excerpt inspite of calling for the same. From Kusunda Area he was transferred to Khas Kusunda Colliery in the year 1990. Before transfer from Kusunda Area to Khas Kusunda Colliery his I.D. Card was prepared. In that I.D. Card his date of birth has been mentioned as 1-6-54 . His first I.D. Card was taken back for issuance of Second I.D. Card . His statement was also sent to the C.M.P.F. Office in which his date of birth was mentioned as 1-6-54 . He has also called for the original document from the management but the management did not file the same . The witness has further said about the check list from E.D.P. Section of Koyala Bhawan in which there is mention of his date of birth as 1-6-54 . In 2000 he came to know that his date of birth has mentioned as 1-6- 45 instead of 1-6-54. He submitted his application for correction of his date of birth . The management did not take any action in the matter . Then he instituted a case before the ALC(C) for correction of date of birth and all consequential benefit with reinstatement in service . During cross-examination the witness has said that in Khas Kusunda Colliery Firstly Form B Register was not prepared. This is not a fact that he put his signature on Form B Register when all entries were made . Some questio.is regarding his time of marriage and age of his son has been put to the witness . He has denied the fact that his entry of date of birth as 1-6-45 is correct and he has been rightly asked to retire from service w.e.f. 1-6- 2005. He has denied the suggestion that no one can get signature in Blank Form B Register and the employee does not sign on Blank Form B Register. He has also
12. MW- 1 in his deposition has stated that at Sl . No. 274 ofthe Form B Register the name and other details ofthe concerned workman has been mentioned . His date ofbirth has been mentioned in Col. 5 as 1-6-45 . This also bears his signature . The witness has further said about. the issuance of L.P.C. of the concerned workman from Khas Kusunda Colliery which is Ext . M- 1 and odjection has been raised. The witness during his further cross- examination has said about the I.D. Card Register ofKhas Kusunda Colliery where the date of appointment of the concerned workman has been mentioned on 31-1-73 and the column ofdate ofbirth is blank. In the Register entries ofmany other employees have not been filled up which relates to page - 10 . He has further stated about the new Form B Register prepared on 20-1-90 when the concerned workman was transferred . He has further said about Sl. No. 1773 at page 95 the name of the concerned workman has been mentioned and his date of birth has been recorded as 1-6-45 . He has also stated that Service Exempt has not been prepared in Khas Kusunda Colliery . During his further examination- in- chief the witness has said about the old FormB Register which is marked as material Ext. 1 . At Sl . No. 274 at page 20 the entries of the concerned workman has been mentioned which is Ext. M-4 andbears the signature of the concerned workman . Further he has said about the issuance of notice of retirement . He has further stated that there is no difference or discrepancy in the record of R.B. Singh when he was initially appointed and he had not raised any objection . When he was transferred from Kusunda Area to Khas Kusunda Colliery a new form B Register was prepared on which the photo 4266
[ PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008 / SRAVANA 1.1 , 1930
the C.M.P.F. Form - A of Khas Kusunda Colliery is not available . He has denied suggestion that in the above document the date of birth of the concerned workman has been recorded as 1-6-54 and due to this the same has not been filed. He denied the suggestion that I.D. Card Register of 1973 and Form B Register of 1973 and Form B of 1990 are forged and fabricated document . He has also denied the suggestion that the document containing date ofbirth as 1-6-54 have been intentionally withheld and not filed.
of the concerned workman has been pasted and he has also put his signature in which his date of birth and date of appointment were the same as in the first Form B Register. He has put his signature in the new Form B Register and he did not raise any objection . There is no document in the colliery regarding justification of the demand of the concerned workmen as his date of birth as 1-6-54. He has also not produced any certificate in this regard In Khas Kusunda Colliery no Service Excerpt was prepared. The demand of the concerned workman is not justified.
13. From the evidence of MW- 1 in examination-
14. From further evidence of MW - 1 in cross- examination it appears that he has supported the version that the date of birth of the concerned workman has been mentioned as 1-6-45 in the initial Form B Register when he was posted at Khas Kusunda Colliery and again in Form B Register prepared in 1980 when the concerned workman was transferred from Khas Kusunda Colliery to Kusunda Area. However, from his evidence it appears that the document like Form B Register maintained at Khusunda Area , C.M.P.F. document has not been filed as the same are not available . From submission made on behalf of the concerned workman it appears that the date of birth as 1-6-54 has been mentioned in the aforesaid document such date of birth mentioned in I.D. Card Register of Khas Kusunda Colliery as in I.D. Card.
15. From perusal of record it appears that several documents including original I.D. Card Register of Khas Kusunda Colliery of 1973 , L.P.C. in original issued by Khas Kusunda Colliery in 1980 on transfer to Kusunda Area Office , original Form B Register of Kusunda Area prepared after the transfer in 1980 , original Service Excerpt prepared in 1987 , I. Card Register of Kusunda Area, original C.M.P.F. record of the concerned workman , original check list of the year 2000 sent by H. Qrs to Khas Kusunda Colliery beside original application of the concerned workman for correction of date of birth were called for by the concerned workman. It appears that the management did not submit the above document. However, during the course of evidence of MW-1 the Form B Register prepared during the year 1973 , copy of L.P.C. issued by Kusunda Area office , I.D. Card Register ofKhas Kusunda Colliery , New Form B Register prepared on 20-1-90 old Form B Register and copy of notice of retirement were produced .
16. From perusal of evidence of MW - 1 as well as from perusal of document Ext . M - 4 ( From B Register opened at the time of initial appointment of the concerned workman) it appears that the date of birth has been mentioned as 1-6-45 . About this document it is said that such document in prepared at the very first initial stage when the workman joins the job . This also bears his signature and no objection has been raised . Therefore the same is the conclusive evidence with regard the date of birth of the concerned workman . Not only this another in- chief it appears that the concerned workman was initially appointed at Khas Kusunda Colliery and thereafter he was transferred to Kusunda Area Office and from Kusunda Area Office to Khas Kusunda Colliery and this fact has not been disputed. Form his further evidence it appears that in Khas Kusunda Colliery on both the occasions i.e. at the time of initial posting as well as when the concerned workman was transferred from Kusunda Area to Khas Kusunda Colliery Form B Register was prepared and in old and new From B Register there is no difference of date of birth and others details . From his evidence it further appears that service Excerpt was not prepared in Khas Kusunda Colliery and the concerned workman has not submitted any certificate regarding his date of birth as 1-6-54 . during cross - examination the witness has said about the procedure of sending L.P.C. on transfer . He has also stated that in the L.P.C. there is column of date of birth . He has also said that he cannot say anything about the L.P.C. of the concerned workman if any prepared during 1980 and he has said that such L.P.C. is not available in the office . He has further said about the availability of service file and that file containing L.P.C. of the concerned workman regarding his transfer from Khas Kusunda Colliery is not available . He has also said about the copy of the L.P.C. or original L.P.C. or his transfer Kusunda Area to Khas Kusunda Colliery . The Service excerpt is prepared on the basis of entries made in the statutory register . The witness has said about the entries 1-6-54 in Ext . W- 2 which is Service Excerpt but he cannot say who has signed as Prabandhak . He cannot say as to how date of birth as 1-6-54 has been recorded . The witness has further said about the joining of the concerned workman in Khas Kusunda Colliery on 20-1-90 on transfer. The Form B Register was prepared on 20-1-90 but the management has signed it and put the date on 13-8-90. He has denied the suggestion that wrong entry has been made in Ext . M- 3 after thought. The witness has also said that the I.D. Register is not prepared yearwise . The witness has further said in Ext. W - 1 I.D. Card there is difference of ink in I.D. Card No. and rest entry as well as designation as Ext . W - 1 and the document marked ' Y' . The original Form B Register of Kusunda Area prepared in 1980 is not available . The office copy of 4267
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II-खंड 3(ii ) ]
which has also been admitted by the MW . Hence it may beheld that the date of birth of the concerned workman is 1-6-54 instead of 1-6-45 .
18. From evidence of MW- 1 it does not appear as to how Ext. W- 1 has been tampered or interpolated or manufactured . In original I.D. Card there is no tampering ofthe date ofbirth . His evidence only shows that there is difference of ink and there is no other I.D. Card of the concerned workman produced by the management to establish that this is not the genuine I.D. Card in which there is entry of date of birth as 1-6-54. Though the concerned workman has not brought any evidence to establish the fact that as to how the date of birth as 1-6-54 has been mentioned in the Service Excerpt but the facts remain that in the Service Excerpt Ext . W- 2 the date of birth has been mentioned as 1-6-54 and this document appears to have been prepared by the management. No satisfactory explanation has been offered by the management as to why the Form B Register of Kusunda Area of the concerned workman and C.M.P.F. document has not been produced in the Court . It has been submitted onbehalf ofthe workman that in these statutory documents date of birth of the concerned workman has been mentioned as 1-6-54. To sum up the following facts have beennoticed:
Form B Register relating to the concerned workman was opened when he was transferred from Kusunda Area to Khas Kusunda Colliery in the year 1990. In this document Ext. M-3 the date of birth of the concerned workman has been mentioned as 1-6-45 . These Form B Registers are statutory document . Therefore there is nothing to doubt that the date ofbirth of the concerned workman is 1-6-45 and both the documents bear the signature of the concerned workman . In Ext . M -3 there is also a photograph of the concerned workman . It has been submitted and also from perusal of Ext . M - 2 it appears that the I.D. Card register relating to the entry of the concerned workman there is no mention of date of birth of the concerned workman . It has been submitted that I.D. Card if any in the hands of the concerned workman does not establish the fact that his date of birth was mentioned as 1-6-54 the I.D. Card Register as there is no such entry in the I.D. Card Register in Ext . M - 2. It has been submitted that the I.D. Card submitted by the concerned workman which is Ext. W- 1 bears different ink relating to the number of the I.D. Card as stated by MW- 1 . Hence the same cannot be relied. About Form B Register of Kusunda Area and copy of C.M.P.F. record relating to the concerned workman is not available. It has been submitted that in this circumstances the date of birth ofthe concerned workman as 1-6-45 has rightly been taken into consideration by the management.
(1) In the Form B Register prepared at the initial stage ofappointment of the concerned workman the date of birth has been mentioned as 1-6-45 Subsequently the concerned workman was transferred to Kusunda Area and again from thatplace he was transferred to Khas Kusunda Colliery where his new Form B Register was prepared and in this Form B Register the date ofbirth has been mentioned as 1-6-45 . In both these Form B Registers there is signature of the concerned workman. It also appears that after these entries the concerned workman had not raised any objection immediately.
(2) The I.D. Card Register does not contain the entry of date of birth of the concerned workman. However the I.D. Card issued to the concerned workman bears his date of birth as 1-6-54 , original I.D. Card does not show tampering of date of birth . The evidence on record does not specifically show that there has beentampering interpolation with the I.D. Card or the same has been manufactured except the use of different ink .
17. On the other hand Ld. Lawyer for the concerned workman has submitted that in fact when the initial Form B Register of the concerned workman was opened only his signature was obtained and was told that other details willbe filledup on the basis ofentries of I.D. Card Register . Therefore , it has been subsequently filled up or managed or false entries have been made regarding date of birth of the concerned workman in Ext. M-4 Form B Register. It has also been submitted that the Form B Register has been prepared and entries have been filled up wrongly or changed which is evident from the fact that the concerned authority has put his signature long after its preparation during the period August, 1990 whereas it is said to be prepared in January , 1990. It has also been submitted that beside this there is entry ofdate ofbirth as 1-6-54 in Form BRegister of Kusunda Area as well as in C.M.P.F. record but these two documents have been intentionally withheld so that the truth may not come out . It has also been submitted that the Service Excerpt clearly indicates that the date of birth of the concerned workman is 1-6-54 . Beside this the I.D. Card issued to the concerned workman shows the entry of date of birth as 1-6-54. The number of the I.D. Card is the same which is entered in the I.D. Card Register Ext . M- 2. So far as the different ink is concerned it is said that it may be due to lack of ink but it isnot the case of the management that there has been any interpolation or tampering in the I.D. Card in question. In this Card date of birth has been mentioned as 1-6-54
(3) A's per pleading and submission the entry in the Form B Register of Kusunda Area and in C.M.P.F. document the date of birth of the concerned workman has been mentioned as 1-6-54 but these documents have not been produced by the management and the 4268
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] explanation offered by the management is not satisfactory. Therefore , an adverse inference has to be drawn against the management for non- production of the document .
recorded in the records of the company, namely, Form B Register , CMPF records and Identity Cards (untampered) will be treated as final . Provided that where is a variation , in the age recorded in the records mentioned above, the matter will be referred to the Age Determination Committee/Medical Board constituted by the Management for determination of age .
19. From perusal of record it appears that the concerned workman had filed an applicationdt. 4-10-02 before the management regarding correction of his date ofbirth on the basis ofentry in C.M.P.F. and Service record vide Ext . W- 3 though objection has been raised regarding this document as the same is photo copy but specifically it has not been stated by the management as to why this document should not be relied on . It will further be relevant to mention that after filing such application no relief was given to the concerned workman and consequently an industrial dispute was raised.
From perusal of the provision referred to above it appears that when the matter cannot be determined in accordance with ( b ) ( i ) ( a) or (b ) ( i ) (b) the date of birth recorded in the Form B Register , C.M.P.F. records and 1. D. Card untampered wili be treated final and in a case there is variation in the above document the matter may be referred to the Age Determination Committee/Medical Board.
20. While going through the provision contained in NCWA Implementation Instruction No. 76 the relevant portion reads as follows :
(B) Review determination of date of birth in respect of existing employees .
21. The aforesaid provision does not say that the Form B Register of initial stage alone has to be taken into consideration .A plain reading of the said provision shows that entries made in Form B Register which also appears to include entries made in Form B Register on transfer of employee.
(i) ( a) In the case of the existing employees Matriculation Certificate or Higher Secondary Certificate issued by the recognised Universities or Board or Middle Pass Certificate issued by the Board of Education and /or Department of Public Instruction and admit cards issued by the aforesaid Bodies should be treated as correct provided they were issued by the said Universities/Boards/ Institution prior to the date ofemployment.
( i ) (b) Similarly, Mining Sirdarship , Winding Engine or similar other statutory certificates where the Manager has to certify the date of birth will be treated as authentic .
22. In the instant case the entry in the I. D. Card shows a different date of birth as 1-6-54 about Form B Register of Kusunda Area and C.M. P.F. record entry of date of birth " 1-6-54" is said to be made but these documents have not been made available by the management . In these circumstances it appears that the age of the concerned workman has to be determined by the Age Determination Committee/ Medical Board constituted by the management for determination of age . Accordingly the best course would be to refer the matter of date of birth of the concerned workman to the Age Determination Committee/Medical Board to be constituted by the management and the decision of the said Committee/Medical Board shall be final .
Provided that where both documents mentioned in ( i) ( a) and ( i) (b ) above are avail-labour , the date of birth recorded in ( i ) ( a) will be treated as authentic .
Accordingly the management is directed to refer the matter of the concerned workman to the Age Determination Committee /Medical Board to be constituted by the management in accordance with the Implementation Instruction No. 76 of the NCWA within 3 months from the date of publication of the Award in the Gazette of India .
( ii ) Wherever there is a no variation in records , such cases will not be reopened unless there is a very glaring and apparent wrong entry brought to the notice of the Management. The Management after being notified on the merits of the case will take appropriate action for correction through Determination Committee/ MedicalBoard,
AnAward is passed accordingly. NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 4 जुलाई, 2008
(C) Age Determination Committee/Medical Board for the above will be constituted by the Management. In the case of employees whose date of birth cannot be determined in accordance with the procedure mentioned in (B) ( i) ( a) or (B) ( i) (b ) above , the date of birth
का. आ. 2110.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मलेरिया रिसर्च सेन्टर, राउरकेला प्रोजेक्ट, राउरकेला के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
4269
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workmen are entitled to ? "
( संदर्भ संख्या 3/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 1-5-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
Asper Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act the [सं. एल-42011 /89/2006- आई आर ( डी यू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 4th July, 2008
S.O. 2110.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 3/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , Bhubaneshwar , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Malaria Research Centre , Rourkela Project , Rourkela and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 1-5-2008 .
[No. L- 42011 / 89/2006 - IR (DU) ] SURRENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT , BHUBANESHWAR
I.D. Case No. 3/2007
The Director, Malaria Research Centre , 22, Sham Nath Marg , Delhi - 110 054
The General Secretary, Malaria Research Project, Employees' Association, Sector-5 , Rourkela- 769002 , Orissa.
Reference No. L- 42011/ 89/ 2006 - IR (DU) , dated 1-2-2007
AWARD
Both the parties are present . Head them on the question of framing issues . At this stage an interesting point came up for consideration as to the maintainability ofthe reference which is in the following terms .
appropriate Government being satisfied about the existence of an Industrial Dispute is to make a reference to the Tribunal for necessary enquiry and while making such reference it is competent to include some other matters appearing to be connected with or relevant to the dispute in question whether it relates to " any matter " specified in the Second Schedule or Third Schedule for adjudication . Under Item- 6 of the Second Schedule the Government is competent to include in the reference all matters other than those specified in the Third schedule and according to Item No. 11 of the Third Schedule " any other matter" that may be prescribed. Harping upon the term " any other matter that may be prescribed" as appearing under Item No. 11 of the Third Schedule it was argued that the Government is competent to include any matters in a reference, whether the same are connected or not with the main reference . It is no doubt true that the discretion of the appropriate Government under Section 10 isvery wide to refer an Industrial Dispute or any matter appearing to be connected with , or relevant to , the dispute , whether it relates to any matter specified in the Second Schedule or Third Schedule to a Tribunal for adjudication . It is also true that " matter appearing to be connected with " or" any other matter that may be prescribed" need not be related to any matter specified in the Second or Third Schedule . But what is needed in a reference is that such matters falling within the category of "any matter appearing to be connected with or relevant to the dispute" or" any other matter that may be prescribed" should have direct nexus with the main reference . If the matter referred is not connected with or relevant to an Industrial Dispute the reference of such matter would be invalid. Besides where the reference is inconsistent with the statutory provisions the same would also be invalid under law . From the terms of reference , as quoted above , it appears that the reference is in two parts . The second part deals with the deduction and non -deposit of C.P.F. contributions collected from the workers while the main reference is in regard to the revision of pay of the workers. Therefore , the 2nd item of the reference can not be considered to be a matter connected with the main reference covered under Item No. 1. Further more , adjudication of matters relating to C.P.F. contributions or its non - deposit being outside the jurisdiction of this Tribunal and more so the said item not being within the purview of Schedule - II and III , the entire reference in its present form appears bad as a whole on the ground of impropriety and lack of jurisdiction on the part of the Tribunal .
Accordingly the reference is disposed of.
( 1 ) "Whether the demand of the Malaria Research CentreProject Employee's Association, Rourkela for revision of pay scales of project employees / temporary employees working as Laboratory Technicians , Assistant Research Scientist/Technical Officer, andHealth Educator at par with the regular employees working in the same posts is legal and justified ? If so , to what relief the workmen are entitled to ? " ( 2) " Whether the action of the Management of Malaria Research Centre , Rourkela Project , Rourkela in not deducting the CPF contribution from the wages of their workmen for the periodfrom 1-4-1998 to March 2001 and in not depositing the employer's share for the above period to the CPF accounts of the concerned workmen is
Sd/- (Illegible) Presiding Officer 2745 GI/08-28 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008/ SRAVAΝΑ 11 , 1930 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4270
2. M/ s . Hi Tek Maintenance ,
नई दिल्ली, 4 जुलाई, 2008
Rep . by its Proprietor ,
No. 17 , Nervannan II Street,
Lakshmipuram ,
Chromepet,
Chennai - 600044
2nd Respondent
APPEARANCE :
For the Petitioner
: K. Sivajothi
का. आ. 2111.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ब्लू डार्ट एविएशन लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 48/2005 ) को. प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
Forthe 1st Party Management : M/s . T. S. Gopalan & Co.
2nd Party Management
[सं. एल-11012/2/2005- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी
:M/ s . Balan Haridas , R. Kamatchi Sundaresan .
New Delhi , the 4th July, 2008
AWARD
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L - 11012 / 2 /2005 - IR( C- I ) dated 2-6-2005 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is :
S.O. 2111.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 48/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s. Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 4-7-2008 .
"Whether the demand of Sri S. Sivakumar for reinstatement by the Management of Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. is justified ? If so , to what relief is the workman entitled ? "
[No. L- 11012/ 2/ 2005 - IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT , CHENNAI
2. The 2nd Party Respondent was impleaded subsequent to the filing of this ID . After the receipt of the Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as 48/ 2005 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statement respectively.
Tuesday , the 25th March , 2008
PRESENT :
3. The allegations in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :
K. Jayaraman , Presiding Officer
Industrial Dispute No. 48/2005
[Inthe matter of dispute for adjudication under clause ( d) of sub -section ( 1 ) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. and their Workman]
BETWEEN
Sri S. Sivakumar ,
S/ o R. Sivanesan ,
No. 28 , Morrison 2nd Street .
Alandur,
Chennai -600016
I Party/Petitioner
Vs.
The petitioner joined the services of the 1st Respondent as a Loader on 8-9-1997 . He was also asked to work as baggage identification at present Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. , which is operating flights from Madras to foreign countries . While so , he was illegallydenied employment w.e.f. 18-11-2004 orally without any notice of termination . The petitioner completed 480 days of continuous service and he is entitled for permanency . While so , 1st Respondent after illegal termination of the petitioner had retained his juniors in service which is in violation ofSection- 25G & H. Further, the 2nd Respondent has not given any notice of termination and violated the mandatory provisions of Section- 25 (F) . Therefore , the petitioner raised the dispute against the Respondents for reinstatement and consequential relief.
1. The Chief Human Resource
Manager ,
4. The 1st Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged as follows :
M/s . Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. ,
88/89 , Old International Terminal ,
Meenambakkam Airport ,
Chennai - 600027
1stRespondent
The Respondent undertakes transportation of cargo by aviation and it has an establishment in Chennai and it is owning 7 Aircrafts . The contract of loading and [भाग II- खंड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावप्प 11 , 1930
4271
from work. The 2nd Respondent came to know that the petitioner has taken better employment and he is gainfully employed and that is why he has not reported for duty. Since he was not terminated, the allegation of the violation of Section - 25G and H of the ID Act does not arise . The allegation of violation of Section 25 - F is also without any substance . Hence for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
6.When the matter was pending before this Tribunal for adjudication , both sides have filed a joint memo of agreement wherein they have stated during the pendency ofthe dispute, the parties had direct negotiations and have arrived at a settlement to the effect that the 2nd Respondent will pay to the petitioner a sum of Rs . 46,500 for full and final settlement of all his claim against both the Respondents including the claim of Gratuity , earned wages, etc. and the petitioner have no claim either against the 1st or the 2nd Respondent on receipt of the amount and further they prayed an award may be passed in terms of this joint memo. The petitioner was present and the Respondent were represented by their Advocates , both parties have signed in the joint memo and the petitioner has admitted that he has received the cheque for the payment of money and an award may be passed in terms ofthe joint memo . The joint memo was recorded .
Point for determination is :
To what relief is the petitioner entitled ?
unloading of cargo at Airport ( on the tarmac ) has to be carried out during night and early morning and apart from flexible of operation and the manpower required would also vary depending on the volume of cargo to be handled. Since 1998 , this Respondent entered into a contract with M/ s . Hitek Maintenance for supply of manpower for attending to loading and unloading work . The Respondent registered itself as principal employer under Contract Labour ( Regulation & Abolition) Act and the certificate of registration bears the date of registration as 24-1-2002. The Contractor viz . the 2nd Respondent also obtained license under the said act . The Contractor is also covered under the ESI and EPF Act having its own code numbers . From the notice issued by the ALC ( C) , the 1st Respondent came to know that the petitioner raised an Industrial Dispute and in that he averred that his services were terminated on 18-11-2004. In that, the petitioner had shown the Contractor M/ s . Hitek Maintenance as a party to the dispute. The petitioner was not employed by this Respondent and he was employed by the Contractor viz . M/ s . Hitek Maintenance and it is the 2nd Respondent who is to answer the claim of the petitioner. In the reply , the 2nd Respondent viz . M/ s . Hitek Maintenance alleged two of its employees who were working in the premises ofthe 1st Respondent were directed to go to the premises of this Respondent in Indian Airlines Stadium and they refused to go and work . Further , they have also prevented the other workmen on that day . Even though , the 2nd Respondent has sent letters to report for duty , the petitioner has never turned up . After considering the merits and demerits , the ALC ( C) submitted his conciliation failure report to the Government that the petitioner was not employed in the services of the 1st Respondent and he was only employed in the 2nd Respondent , hence for all these reasons , the 1st Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
5. The 2nd Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged:
7. As I have already stated that both sides have entered into an agreement and joint memo was filed before this Tribunal and it is also admitted by the petitioner that an award may be passed in terms of joint memo and the petitioner has also stated that he has received the cheque for the amount mentioned in the joint memo and he has no grievance against both the Respondents . I find the compromise is for the benefit of the petitioner . As such, anaward is to be passed in terms ofjoint memo ..The joint memo forms part of the record.
8. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly .
(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 25th March , 2008)
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer
Witness Examined :
: None For the 1st Party/Petitioner
For the 2nd Party/ Management : None
Documents Marked
On the Petitioner's side
Nil
On the Management's side
The 2nd Respondent was awarded contract to supply manpower for certain jobs by the 1st Respondent . The Ist Respondent and the 2nd Respondent have also registered their names under the Contract Labour ( Regulation & Abolition) Act as the principal employer and contractor respectively. For supplying of contract labour, the 2nd Respondent engaged the petitioner and certain other employees . One Venkateswaralu and Sivakumar (the petitioner herein) were deputed on 18-11-2004 to attend to the work in Indian Airlines Airport Stadium . Further , he failed todo the work alongwith certain other employees and further the petitioner had informed that he is no longer interested to work with the 1st Respondent . Even after the letter dated 20-11-2004 calling upon the petitioner to report for work , the petitioner failed to come for work. The 2nd Respondent has not terminated the services of the petitioner , it is the petitioner who has stayed away.
Nil THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4272
नई दिल्ली, 4 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2112.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ब्लूडार्ट एविएसन लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 50/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -11012/4/2005- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th July, 2008
S.O. 2112.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref . No. 50/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . Blue DartAviation Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 4-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/4 /2005 - IR (C - I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT , CHENNAI
Tuesday , the 25th March , 2008
PRESENT :
K. Jayaraman , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 50/2005
[Inthe matter of dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofsub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), between the Management of Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. and their Workman]
BETWEEN
... I Party/Petitioner Sri S. S. Sivakumar 9/4, First Street, Kandan Colony, Alandur ,
Chennai - 600016
Vs.
1. The Chief Human Resource 1stRespondent Manager,
M/s. Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. 88/89 , Old International Terminal , Meenambakkam Airport , Chennai -600027
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]
2nd Respondent 2. M/s . Hi Tek Maintenance
Rep.. by its Proprietor ,
No. 17 , Nervannan II Street ,
Lakshmipuram,
Chromepet,
Chennai -600044
APPEARANCE :
K. Sivajothi For the Petitioner
: For the 1st Party Management : M/s . T. S.
Gopalan & Co. 2nd Party Management
: M/s . Balan Haridas , R. Kamatchi Sundaresan
AWARD
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L - 11012 /4 /2005 - IR( C - I ) dated 2-6-2005 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is :
"Whether the demand of Sri S. S. Sivakumar for reinstatement by the management of Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. is justified ? If so , to what relief is the workman entitled ? "
2. The 2nd Party Respondent was impleaded subsequent to the filing of this ID. After the receipt ofthe Industrial Dispute, this Tribunal has numbered it has 50/2005 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statement respectively .
3. The allegations in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :
The petitoner joined the services of the 1st Respondent as a Loader on 8-9-1997 . He was also asked to work as baggage identification at present Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. , which is operating flights from Madras to foreign countries . While so , he was illegally denied employment w.e.f. 18-11-2004 orally without any notice of termination . The petitioner completed 480 days of continuous service and he is entitled for permanency . While so, 1st Respondent after illegal termination of the petitioner had retained his juniors in service which is in violation of Sections - 25G & H. Further , the 2nd Respondent has not given any notice of termination and violated the mandatory provisions of Section - 25 (F ) . Therefore , the petitioner raised the dispute against the Respondents for reinstatement and consequential relief.
4. The Ist Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged as follows:
TheRespondent undertakes transportation of cargo by aviation and it has an establishment in Chennai and it is owning , 7 Aircrafts . The contract of loading and [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
4273
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
the petitioner has taken better employment and he is gainfully employed and that is why he has not reported for duty. Since he was not terminated, the allegation of the violation of Sections - 25G and H of the ID Act does not arise . The allegation of violation of Section 25 - F is also without any substance . Hence for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
6.Whenthe matter was pending before this Tribunal for adjudication, both sides have filed a joint memo of agreement wherein they have stated during the pendency ofthe dispute , the parties had direct negotiations and have arrived at a settlement to the effect that the 2nd Respondent will pay to the petitioner a sum of Rs . 26,500 for full and final settlement of all his claim against both the Respondent including the claim ofGratuity , earned wages , etc. and the petitioner have no claim either against the 1st or the 2nd Respondent on receipt of the amount and further they prayed an award may be passed in terms of this joint memo . The petitioner was present and the Respondent were represented by their Advocates , both parties have signed in the joint memo and the petitioner has admitted that he has received the cheque for the payment of money and an award may be passed in terms of thejoint memo . The joint memo was recorded.
Point for determination is :
To what relief is the petitioner entitled ?
unloading of cargo at Airport ( on the tarmac ) has to be carried out during night and early morning and apart from flexible of operation and the manpower required would also vary depending on the volume of cargo to be handled. Since 1998 , this Respondent entered into a contract with M/ s . Hitek Maintenance for supply of manpower for attending to loading and unloading work. The Respondent registered itself as principal employer under Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act and the certificate ofregistration bears the date of registration as 24-1-2002. The Contractor viz . the 2nd Respondent also obtained license under the said act. The Contractor is also covered under the ESI and EPF Act having its own code numbers . From the notice issued by the ALC ( C) , the 1st Respondent came to know that the petitoner raised an Industrial Dispute and in that he averred that his services were terminated on 18-11-2004 . In that , the petitioner had shown the Contractor M/s . Hitek Maintenance as a party to the dispute . The petitioner was not employed by this Respondent and he was employed by the Contractor viz . M/ s . Hitek Maintenance and it is the 2nd Respondent who is to answer the claim of the petitioner . In the reply, the 2nd Respondent viz . M/ s . Hitek Maintenance alleged two of its employees who were working in the premises of the 1st Respondent were directed to go to the premises of this Respondent in Indian Airlines Stadium and they refused to go and work. Further , they have also prevented the other workmen on that day . Even though , the 2nd Respondent has sent letters to report for duty , the petitioner has never turned up . After considering the merits and demerits , the ALC( C) submitted his conciliation failure report to the Government that the petitioner was not employed in the services of the 1st Respondent and he was only employed in the 2nd Respondent , hence for all these reasons , the 1st Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
5. The 2nd Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged:
7. As I have already stated that both sides have entered into an agreement and joint memo was filed before this Tribunal and it is also admitted by the petitioner that an award may be passed in terms of joint memo and the petitioner has also stated that he has received the cheque for the amount mentioned in the joint memo and he has no grievance against both the Respondents . I find the compromise is for the benefit of the petitioner. As such, an award is to be passed in terms ofjoint memo . The joint memo forms part of the record.
8. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly . (Dictated to the P.A. transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 25th March , 2008 )
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer
Witness Examined :
For the 1st Party/Petitioner : None Forthe 2nd Party/Management : None
Documents Marked
On the Petitioner's side
On the Management's side
Nil Nil
The 2nd Respondent was awarded contract to supply manpower for certain jobs by the 1st Respondent . The 1st Respondent and the 2nd Respondent have also registered their names under the Contract Labour ( Regulation & Abolition) Act as the principal employer and contractor respectively . For supplying of contract labour, the 2nd Respondent engaged the petitoner and certain other employees . The said workman deputed on 18-11-2004 to attend to the work in Indian Airlines Airport Stadium . Further, he failed to do the work alongwith certain other employees and further the petitoner had informed that he is no longer interested to work with the 1st Respondent . Evenafter the letter dated 20-11-2004 calling upon the petitioner to report for work, the petitioner failed to come for work. The 2nd Respondent has not terminated the services of the petitioner, it is the petitoner who has stayed away from work . The 2nd Respondent came to know that 4274
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVAΝΑ 11 , 1930
नई दिल्ली, 4 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2113.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . ब्लू डार्ट एविएशन लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 52/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं . एल -11012/6/2005- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th July, 2008
S.O. 2113. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref . No. 52/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 4-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/6/2005 - IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT , CHENNAI
Tuesday , the 25th March , 2008
PRESENT :
K. Jayaraman , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 52/2005
[ In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. and their Workman.)
BETWEEN
Sri M. Nagarajan
S/o Munusamy ,
No. 44/1 , Thiruvallur Street, Meenambakkam , Chennai -600016
I Party/ Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Chief Human Resource
Manager
M/s . Blue Dart Aviation Ltd.
88/89 , Old International Terminal ,
Meenambakkam Airport ,
Chennai - 600027
IstRespondent
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 2. M/ s . Hi Tek Maintenance
Rep. by its Proprietor ,
No. 17 , Nervannan II Street ,
Lakshmipuram,
Chromepet,
Chennai - 600044
2nd Respondent APPEARANCE :
For the Petitioner
:K. Sivajothi For the 1st Party Management : M /s T. S. Gopalan& Co.
: M/ sBalan 2nd Party Management
Haridas, R. Kamatchi Sundaresan
AWARD
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L - 11012 / 6/ 2005 - IR( C -I) dated 2-6-2005 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is :
"Whether the demand of Sri M. Nagarajan for reinstatement by the Management of Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. is justified ? If so , to what relief is the workman entitled ?"
2. The 2nd Party Respondent was impleaded subsequent to the filing of this ID . After the receipt of the Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it has 52/2005 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statement respectively.
3. The allegations in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :
The petitioner joined the services of the 1st Respondent as a Loader on 8-9-1997 . He was also asked to work as baggage identification at present Blue DartAviation Ltd. , which is operating flights from Madras to foreign countries . While so , he was illegally denied employment w.e.f. 18-11-2004 orally without any notice of termination . The petitioner completed 480 days of continuous service and he is entitled for permanency . While so, 1st Respondent after illegal termination of the petitioner had retained his juniors in service which is in violation of Section - 25G & H. Further , the 2nd Respondent has not given any notice of termination and violated the mandatory provisions of Section - 25 ( F) . Therefore , the petitioner raised the dispute against the Respondents for reinstatement and consequential relief .
4. The 1st Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged as follows :
The Respondent undertakes transportation of cargo by aviation and it has an establishment in Chennai and it is owning 7 Aircrafts . The contract of loading and [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
4275
the petitioner has taken better employment and he is gainfully employed and that is why he has not reported for duty. Since he was not terminated , the allegation of the violation of Section - 25G and H of the ID Act does not arise . The allegation of violation of Section 25 - F is also without any substance . Hence for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
6.Whenthe matter was pending before this Tribunal for adjudication , both sides have filed a joint memo of agreement wherein they have stated during the pendency ofthe dispute , the parties had direct negotiations and have arrived at a settlement to the effect that the 2nd Respondent will pay to the petitioner a sum of Rs . 22,500 for full and final settlement of all his claim against both the Respondent including the claim of Gratuity , earned wages , etc. and the petitioner have no claim either against the 1st or the 2nd Respondent on receipt of the amount and further they prayed an award may be passed in terms of this joint memo . The petitioner was present and the Respondent were represented by their Advocates , both parties have signed in the joint memo and the petitioner has admitted that he has received the cheque for the payment of money and an award may be passed in terms ofthe joint memo . The joint memo was recorded.
Point for determination is :
To what relief is the petitioner entitled ?
unloading of cargo at Airport (on the tarmac ) has to be carried out during night and early morning and apart from flexible of operation and the manpower required would also vary depending on the volume of cargo to be handled. Since 1998 , this Respondent entered into a contract with M/ s . Hitek Maintenance for supply of manpower for attending to loading and unloading work. The Respondent registered itself as principal employer under Contract Labour ( Regulation & Abolition ) Act and the certificate ofregistration bears the date of registration as 24-1-2002. The Contractor viz . the 2nd Respondent also obtained license under the said Act. The Contractor is also covered under the ESI and EPF Act having its own code numbers . From the notice issued by the ALC (C) , the 1st Respondent came to know that the petitioner raised an Industrial Dispute and in that he averred that his services were terminated on 18-11-2004. In that , the petitioner had shown the Contractor M/ s . Hitek Maintenance as a party to the dispute . The petitioner was not employed by this Respondent and he was employed by the Contractor viz . M/ s . Hitek Maintenance and it is the 2nd Respondent who is to answer the claim of the petitioner. In the reply , the 2nd Respondent viz . M/ s . Hitek Maintenance alleged two of its employees who were working in the premises of the 1st Respondent were directed to go to the premises of this Respondent in Indian Airlines Stadium and they refused to go and work. Further , they have also prevented the other workmen on that day . Even though , the 2nd Respondent has sent letters to report for duty, the petitioner has never turned up . After considering the merits and demerits , the ALC ( C ) submitted his conciliation failure report to the Government that the petitioner was not employed in the service of the 1st Respondent and he was only employed in the 2nd Respondent, hence for all these reasons, the 1st Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
5. The 2nd Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged:
7. As I have already stated that both sides have entered into an agreement and joint memo was filed before this Tribunal and it is also admitted by the petitioner that an award may be passed in terms ofjoint memo and the petitioner has also stated that he has received the cheque for the amount mentioned in the joint memo and he has no grievance against both the Respondents . I find the compromise is for the benefit of the petitioner . As such, an award is to be passed in terms ofjoint memo . The joint memo forms part of the record .
8. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly .
(Dictated to the P.A. transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 25th March , 2008)
K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer
Witness Examined :
On the Petitioner's side
: None Forthe 1st Party/Petitioner For the 2nd Party/ Management : None Documents Marked Nil
On the Management's side
Nil
The 2nd Respondent was awarded contract to supply manpower for certain jobs by the 1st Respondent . The 1st Respondent and the 2nd Respondent have also registered their names under the Contract Labour ( Regulation & Abolition) Act as the principal employer and contractor respectively . For supplying of contract labour, the 2nd Respondent engaged the petitioner and certain other employees . The said workman was deputed on 18-11-2004 to attend to the work in Indian Airlines Airport Stadium . Further , he failed to do the work alongwith certain other emp'oyees and further the petitioner had informed that he isno longer interested to work with the 1st Respondent . Even after the letter dated 20-11-2004 calling upon the petitioner to report for work , the petitioner failed to come for work . The 2nd Respondent has not terminated the services ofthe petitioner , it is the petitioner who has stayed away from work . The 2nd Respondent came to know that 4276
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
नई दिल्ली, 4 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2114.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ब्लू डार्ट एविएशन लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 49/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/3/2005- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th July, 2008
S.O. 2114.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 49/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court Chennai now as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 4-7-2008 .
[No. L - 11012/ 3 /2005 - IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT , CHENNAI
Tuesday, the 25th March , 2008
PRESENT :
K. Jayaraman ,, Presiding Officer
Industrial Dispute No. 49/2005
[Inthe matter of dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofsub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , between the Management of Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. and their Workman]
BETWEEN
Sri J. Venkateshwaralu
S/o Obaiah ,
No. 22 , Maraimalai Adigal Street , MMDA Nagar,
Chitlapakkam, Chennai - 600064
... I Party/Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Chief Human Resource
Manager M/ s . Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. 88/89 , Old International Terminal ,
Meenambakkam Airport,
Chennai -600027 .
... 1st Respondent
[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2. M/ s . Hi Tek Maintencance
Rep. by its Proprietor ,
No. 17, Nervannan II Street ,
Lakshmipuram ,
Chromepet,
Chennai -600044
... 2nd Respondent APPEARANCE :
For the Petitioner
: K. Sivajothi For the 1st Party Management : M/ s . T. S. Gopalan & Co.
: M/ s . Balan 2nd Party Management
Haridas , R.
Kamatchi
Sundaresan
AWARD
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L - 11012/ 3 /2005 - IR( C - I ) dated 2-6-2005 referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is:
"Whether the demand of Sri J. Venkateshwaralu for reinstatement by the Management of Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. is justified ? If so , to what relief is the workman entitled ? "
2. The 2nd Party Respondent was impleaded subsequent to the filing of this ID . After the receipt of the Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as 49/ 2005 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their. Claim and Counter Statement respectively .
3. The allegations in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :
The petitioner joined the services of the 1st Respondent as a Loader on 8-9-1997 . He was also asked to work as baggage identification at present Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. , which is operating flights from Madras to foreign countries . While so , he was illegally denied employment w.e.f. 18-11-2004 orally without any notice of termination . The petitioner completed 480 days of continuous service and he is entitled for permanency . While so , 1st Respondent after illegal termination of the petitioner had retained his juniors in service which is in violation of Section - 25G & H. Further , the 2nd Respondent has not given any notice of termination and violated the mandatory provisions of Section - 25 ( F) . Therefore , the petitioner raised the dispute against the Respondents for reinstatement and consequential relief.
4. The 1st Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged as follows :
The Respondent undertakes transportation of cargo by aviation and it has an establishment in Chennai and it 4277 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008 /श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खंड 3 (ii ) ]
who has stayed away from work . The 2nd Respondent came to know that the petitioner has taken better employment and he is gainfully employed and that is why he has not reported for duty. Since he was not terminated, the allegation of the violation of Section - 25G and H of the ID Act does not arise. The allegation of violation of Section 25 - F is also without any substance . Hence for all these reasons, the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
6.When the matter was pending before this Tribunal for adjudication , both sides have filed a joint memo of agreement wherein they have stated during the pendency ofthe dispute , the parties had direct negotiations and have arrived at a settlement to the effect that the 2nd Respondent will pay to the petitioner a sum of Rs . 41,500 for full and final settlement of all his claims against both the Respondents including the claim of Gratuity , earned wages , etc. and the petitioner have no claim either against the 1st or the 2nd Respondent on receipt of the amount and further they prayed an award may be passed in terms of this joint memo. The petitioner was present and the Respondent were represented by their Advocates , both parties have signed in the joint memo and the petitioner has admitted that he has received the cheque for the payment of money and an award may be passed in terms ofthe joint memo. The joint memo was recorded.
Point for determination is :
To what relief is the petitioner entitled ?
is owning 7 Aircrafts . The contract of loading and unloading of cargo at Airport (on the tarmac) has to be carried out during night and early morning and apart from flexible of operation and the manpower required would also vary depending on the volume of cargo to be handled . Since 1998 , this Respondent entered into a contract with M/s . Hitek Maintenance for supply of manpower for attending to loading and unloading work . The Respondent registered itself as principal employer under Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition ) Act and the certificate ofregistration bears the date of registration as 24-1-2002. The Contractor viz . the 2nd Respondent also obtained license under the said Act . The Contractor is also covered under the ESI and EPF Act having its own code numbers . From the notice issued by the ALC(C ) , the 1st Respondent came to know that the petitioner raised an industrial dispute and in that he averred that his services were terminated on 18-11-2004. In that, the petitioner had shown the Contractor M/s . Hitek Maintenance as a party to the dispute . The petitioner was not employed by this Respondent and he was employed by the Contractor viz . M/s . Hitek Maintenance and it is the 2nd Respondent who is to answer the claim of the petitioner . In the reply, the 2nd Respondent viz . M/s . Hitek Maintenance alleged two of its employees who were working in the premises of the 1st Respondent were directed to go to the premises of this Respondent in Indian Airlines Stadium and they refused to go and work. Further , they have also prevented the ' other workmen on that day . Even though , the 2nd Respondent has sent letters to report for duty, the petitioner has never turned up . After considering the merits and demerits , the ALC (C) submitted his conciliation failure report to the Government that the petitioner was not employed in the services of the 1st Respondent and he was only employed in the 2nd Respondent, hence for all these reasons , the 1st Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
7. As I have already stated that both sides have entered into an agreement and joint memo was filed before this Tribunal and it is also admitted by the petitioner that an award may be passed in terms of joint memo and the petitioner has also stated that he has received the cheque for the amount mentioned in the joint memo and he has no grievance against both the Respondents . I find the compromise is for the benefit of the petitioner . As such , an award is to be passed in terms ofjoint memo . The joint memo forms part of the record.
5. The 2nd Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged:
8. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly.
(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 25th March, 2008 )
K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer .
Witness Examined :
:: None
On the Petitioner's side
For the 1st Party /Petitioner For the 2nd Party/Management : None Documents Marked Nil
On the Management's side
Nil
The 2nd Respondent was awarded contract to supply manpower for certain jobs by the 1st Respondent . The 1st Respondent and the 2nd Respondent have also registered their names under the Contract Labour ( Regulation & Abolition) Act as the principal employer and contractor respectively . For supplying of contract labour, the 2nd Respondent engaged the petitoner and certain other employees . The concerned workman was deputed on 18-11-2004 to attend to the work in Indian Airlines Airport Stadium. Further , he failed to do the work alongwith certain other employees and further the petitioner had informed that he is no longer interested to work with the 1st Respondent . Even after the letter dated 20-11-2004 calling upon the petitioner to report for work, the petitioner failed to come for work. The 2nd Respondent has not terminated the services of the petitioner , it is the petitioner
2745 GI/08-29 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4278
नई दिल्ली, 4 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2115.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . ब्लूडार्ट एविएशन लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 51/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012 / 5/2005- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th July, 2008
S.O. 2115.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 51/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 4-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/5 / 2005 - IR ( C - I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT , CHENNAI
Tuesday, the 25th March, 2008
PRESENT :
K. Jayaraman , Presiding Officer
Industrial Dispute No. 51/2005
[In the matter ofdispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofsub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. and their Workman]
BETWEEN
Sri N. Kanniyappan
S/ o A. Natarajan ,
No. 9/ 10-3 , Arumalai Chavadi
Cantonment, Pallavaram,
Chennai -600045
... I Party/Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Chief Human Resource
Manager,
M/s. Blue Dart Aviation Ltd ,
88/89 , Old International Terminal ,
Meenambakkam Airport, Chennai - 600027 ... 1st Respondent
[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 2. M/ s . Hi Tek Maintenance
Rep. by its Proprietor, No. 17 , Nervanhan II Street , Lakshmipuram , Chromepet, Chennai -600044
... 2nd Respondent APPEARANCE :
For the Petitioner
: K. Sivajothi Forthe 1st Party Management : M/ s . T. S.
Gopalan& Co.
:
2nd Party Management
M/s . Balan Haridas, R. Kamatchi
Sundaresan
AWARD
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 11012/ 5/2005 - IR ( C- I ) dated 2-6-2005 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is:
"Whether the demand of Sri N. Kanniyappan for reinstatement by the Management of Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. is justified ? If so , to what relief is the workman entitled ? "
2. The 2nd Party Respondent was impleaded subsequent to the filing of this ID . After the receipt of the Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it has 51/2005 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their Advocates and filedtheir Claim and Counter Statement respectively .
3. The allegations in the Claim Statement are briefly asfollows :
The petitioner joined the services of the 1st Respondent as a Loader on 8-9-1997 . He was also asked to work as baggage identification at present Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. , which is operating flights from Madras to foreign countries . While so , he was illegally denied employment w.e.f. 18-11-2004 orally without any notice of termination . The petitioner completed 480 days of continuous service and he is entitled for permanency. While so, 1st Respondent after illegal termination of the petitioner had retained his juniors in service which is in violation of Section- 25G & H. Further, the 2nd Respondent has not given any notice of termination and violated the mandatory provisions of Section - 25 ( F) . Therefore , the petitioner raised the dispute against the Respondents for reinstatement and consequential relief.
4. The 1st Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged as follows :
The Respondent undertakes transportation of cargo by aviation and it has an establishment in Chennai and it भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
is owning 7 Aircrafts . The contract of loading and unloading of cargo at Airport (on the tarmac ) has to be carried out during night and early morning and apart from flexible of operation and the manpower required would also vary depending on the volume of cargo to be handled. Since 1998 , this Respondent entered into a contract with M/ s. Hitek Maintenance for supply of manpower for attending to loading and unloading work. The Respondent registered itself as principal employer under the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition ) Act and the certificate ofregistration bears the date of registration as 24-1-2002 . The Contractor viz . the 2nd Respondent also obtained license under the said Act . The Contractor is also covered under the ESI and EPF Act having its own code numbers . From the notice issued by the ALC(C ) , the 1st Respondent came to know that the petitioner raised an Industrial Dispute and in that he averred that his services were terminated on 18-11-2004 . In that , the petitioner had shown the Contractor M/ s . Hitek Maintenance as a party to the dispute. The petitioner was not employed by this Respondent and he was employed by the Contractor viz . M/s .Hitek Maintenance and it is the 2nd Respondent who is to answer the claim of the petitioner. In the reply, the 2ndRespondent viz. M/s. Hitek Maintenance alleged two of its employees who were working in the premises ofthe 1st Respondent were directed to go to the premises of this Respondent in Indian Airlines Stadium and they refused to go and work. Further, they have also prevented the other workmen on that day . Even though , the 2nd Respondent has sent letters to report for duty , the petitioner has never turned up . After considering the merits and demerits , the ALC (C) submitted his conciliation failure report to the Government that the petitioner was not employed in the services of the 1st Respondent and he was only employed in the 2nd Respondent, hence for all these reasons , the 1st Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs.
5. The 2nd Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged:
4279 away from work . The 2nd Respondent came to know that the petitioner has taken better employment and he is gainfully employed and that is why he has not reported for duty. Since he was not terminated , the allegation of the violation of Section - 25G and H of the ID Act does not arise . The allegation of violation of Section 25 - F is also without any substance . Hence for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
6.When the matter was pending before this Tribunal for adjudication, both sides have filed a joint memo of agreement wherein they have stated during the pendency ofthe dispute, the parties had direct negotiations and have arrived at a settlement to the effect that the 2nd Respondent will pay to the petitioner a sum of Rs . 22,500 for full and final settlement of all his claims against both the Respondents including the claim of Gratuity , earned wages , etc. and the petitioner have no claim either against the 1st or the 2nd Respondent on receipt of the amount and further they prayed, an award may be passed in terms ofthis joint memo. The petitioner was present and the Respondents were represented by their Advocates , both parties have signed in the joint memo and the petitioner has admitted that he has received the cheque for the payment of money and an award may be passed in terms ofthe joint memo. The joint memo was recorded .
Pointfor determination is :
To what relief is the petitioner entitled ?
7. As I have already stated that both sides have entered into an agreement and joint memo was filed before this Tribunal and it is also admitted by the petitioner that an award may be passed! in terms of joint memo and the petitioner has also stateck that he has received the cheque for the amount mentioned in the joint memo and he has no grievance against both the Respondents . I find the compromise is for the benefit of the petitioner . As such , an award is to be passed in terms ofjoint memo. The joint memo forms part of the record.
8. Thus, the reference is answered accordingly .
(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , correctedand pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 25th March , 2008 )
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer Witness Examined :
For the 1st Party/Fetitioner : None Forthe 2nd Party/ Management : None Docunnents Marked
On the Petitioner's side
Nil
On the Management's side
The 2nd Respondent was awarded contract to supply manpower for certain jobs by the 1st Respondent. The 1st Respondent and the 2nd Respondent have also registered their names under the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act as the principal employer and contractor respectively. For supplying of contract labour, the 2nd Respondent engaged the petitioner and certain other employees . The said workman was deputed on 18-11-2004 to attend to the work in Indian Airlines Airport Stadium . Further , he failed to do the work alongwith certain other employees and further the petitioner had informed that he is no longer interested to work with the 1st Respondent. Even after the letter dated 20-11-2004 calling upon the petitioner to report for work, the petitioner failed to come for work. The 2nd Respondent has not terminated the services of the petitioner, it is the petitioner who has stayed
Nil 4280
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVAΝΑ 11 , 1930
नई दिल्ली , 8 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2116.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी. सी. सी. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 286/2001/ 99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-20012/398/2000- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 8th July, 2008
S.O. 2116.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 286/2001/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , now Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . BCC Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 8-7-2008.
[No. L- 20012/ 398/ 2000 - IR ( C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO . 2) AT DHANBAD
PRESENT :
Shri Nagendra Kumar, Presiding Officer Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 .
Reference No. 286 of 2001
PARTIES :
Employers in relation to the management ofBararee Colliery of BCCL and their workman .
APPEARANCES :
Onbehalf of the workman : Mr. B. Lal , Advocate
Onbehalf of the employers Mr. U. N. Lal , Advocate
State : Jharkhand
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] ofthe I.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/398/2000- IR (C -I) , dated, the 30th October, 2001 . SCHEDULE
"Whether the stand of the management of Bararee Colliery BCCL's in denial of employment to Sri Israil Khan , S/ o Late Israfil Khan is justified ? If not, to what relief is the said dependant entitled ?" 2. The case of the concerned workman according to Written Statement submitted by the sponsoring union on his behalf in brief is as follows :-
The sponsoring union submitted that the concerned workman was a permanent employee of Bararee Colliery as Bill Clerk . They submitted that said Md . Israil Khan died on 2-9-94 while he was in employment. After his death Smt. Kulsum Nisa applied for her employment in place of her deceased husband. They further submitted that competent authority approved employment of said Kulsum Nisa and accordingly directed her to appear before the Medical Board for her medical test. During medical examination they submitted that age of said Kulsum Nisa. wasassessed as 50 years and for which it was not possible for the management to provide any employment to her . Accordingly under such situation the widow of said Israil Khan i.e. Smt . Kulsum Nisa applied for monetary compensation and to put the name of her son Md. Israfil Khan on live roster under clause 9.5.0 ( iii ) which was duly approved vide GM ( PIR) Koyla Bhawan's letter No. BCCL/PA/8 /3 / 13 /Area/ 11 / 10/ 95 / 5184-87 , dated, 27-2-97 . They submitted that as per clause 9.5.0( iii) of NCWA said Israil Khan son of the deceased worker is entitled for employment in place of his father after attaining the age of 18 years as his name was kept in live roster . They submitted that management illegally and arbitrarily violating the provision as laid down in NCWA-V refused to provide employment to Israfil Khan without assigning any reason in place of his deceased father Israil Khan . Accordingly he raised an industrial dispute for conciliation which ultimately resulted in reference to this Tribunal for adjudication . The sponsoring union accordingly submitted prayer to pass Award directing the management ofBararee Colliery ofM/ s . BCCL to provide employment to Israfil Khan as being dependent son of Israil Khan .
Industry: Coal
Dated, Dhanbad, the 2nd June , 2008
AWARD
The Govt . of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise ofthe powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1) ( d) 3. Management instead of submitting Written Statement filed rejoinder wherein they denied all claims and allegations which the sponsoring union asserted in their Written Statement . Management admitted that Md. Israil Khan was a permanent employee of Bararee Colliery as Bill Clerk and he died on 2-9-94 while he was on employment . They submitted that application submitted by Smt . Kulsum Nisa could not be considered for as it was not in accordance with the provision of NCWA- V . They submitted that as the age of the widow of the deceased employee was more than 45 years management 4281
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[भाग II- खंड 3 (ii ) ]
decided to sanction monetary compensation in lieu of employment as per provision of NCWA . They further submitted that as age of the son of the deceased employee was below 15 years his name could not be kept on live roster. Accordingly question of providing employment beyond the scope of NCWA did not arise . They further submitted that the claim for employment of the son of the deceased worker could not be considered as his age was below 15 years on the date ofdeath ofthe deceased worker . In view of the facts and circumstances management submitted that the son of the deceased worker is not entitled to get any employment as per provision laid down in Clause 9.5.0 (iii ) of NCWA - V and for which the claim made by the sponsoring union is liable to be rejected.
POINTS TO BE DECIDED
"Whether the stand of the management of Bararee Colliery BCCL's in denial of employment to Sri Israil Khan , S/o Late Israfil Khan is justified ? If not, to what relief is the said dependant entitled ?"
FINDING WITH REASONS
4. It transpires from the record that management insupport of their claim examined one witness as MW- 1. The sponsoring union also with a view to substantiate their claim examined one witness as WW- 1 . MW-1 Bipin Bihari Rai during his evidence disclosed that Israil Khan was a Bill Clerk in the office of the Bararee Colliery. He died on 2-9-94. Accordingly widow of the said worker i.e. Kulsum Nisa submitted an application for her employment . As she was more than 45 years old management asked her to apply for monetary compensation as there was no provision to provide employment to any person who is more than 45 years old. Insupport of that claim management relied on the order which during hearing was marked as Ext . W- 3 wherein it has been specifically mentioned that as there was no provision to provide any employment to any dependent who crossed 45 years of age he /she is entitled to get monetary compensation as per clause 9.5.0 ( iii ) as laid down in NCWA- V. By the same order management granted a sum of Rs . 2000 per month as monetary compensationto the widow of the deceased worker subject to the condition that the same will be stopped on attaining the age of 18 years by the son of the deceased worker and employment would be provided to him according to his qualification on attaining his competency. This witness disclosedthat on the basis of that order of the Hqrs . Office of Bararee Colliery issued an order dt . 30-6-97 which during evidence was marked as Ext. M - 1 . According to this office order Smt. Kulsum Nisa will get monetary compensation from March , 1997 till the age of 60 years i.e. upto 5-4-2006 or till her death whichever is earlier . It has been further mentioned that in case her son gets employment after attaining the age of 18 years monetary compensationwill be stopped. According to clause 1 and 2 of the said office order said monetary compensation which management decided to provide to Smt . Kulsum Nisa will be stopped in case her son gets employment after attaining age of 18 years .
Itis admitted fact that widow of the deceased worker in view of the order referred to above received monetary compensation from the management but contention ofthe management is that in spite of receiving said monetary compensation Smt . Kulsum Nisa submitted an application again to the management for employment of her son on compassionate ground. After receipt of the said application the local office forwarded the same to the Headquarters for consideration but Headquarters rejected the prayer of the petitioner Smt . Kulsum Nisa vide letterdt. 1 /2-8-2000 which during evidence was marked as Ext . M - 2 . The letter marked as Ext . M - 2 speaks as follows :-
"BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED (A subsidiary of Coal India Ltd. ) Koyla Bhawan, Dhanbad" .
BCCL/ PL- VI/ 3 ( 13 )/Ar . A/38 /2000
Dt. 1/2-8-2000 To
The Dy. C.P.M. , Lodna Area. Dear Sir,
The case for employment of Sri Md. Ishrafil Khan, S/o Late Md . Israil Khan , ex- Bill Clerk of Bararee Colliery, forwarded vide your note No. 1051dt. 10-4-2000 has been regretted by the competent authority for the reason that the age of claimant son was below 15 years on the date of death of ex- workman and as such the claim is not covered under the provisions of NCWA-V.
However, the payment of monetary compensation in lieu of employment to Smt . Kulsum Nisa , W/o Late Israil Khan may be continued till she reaches 60 years of age, if she is interested.
This is for your information and further necessary action please .
Yours faithfully,
Sd/-
(R. K. SAXENA )
Personnel Manager (MP & R) . " Considering the facts disclosed in the said letter marked as Ext. M - 2 it transpires that claim for compassionate employment of the son of Kulsum Nisa was regretted by the management on the ground that the 4282
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] age of the claimant's son was below 15 years on the date of death of ex -workman Israfil Khan on the ground that his claim was not covered under the provision ofNCWA- V. Clause 9.5.0 of NCWA-V deals with employment/ monetary compensation to female dependants ofworkmen who die while in service and who are declared medically unfit as per clause 9.4.0 above would be regulated as under:
Clause ( ii) :
Incase of death/ total permanent disablement due to causes other than mine accident and medical unfitness under clauses 9.4.0 if the female dependant is below the age of 45 years she will have the option either to accept the monetary compensation of Rs . 2,000 per month or employment.
In case the female dependant is above 45 years of age she will be entitled only to monetary compensation and not to employment.
Clause ( iii) :
in age on the date of death of the deceased worker and if that condition is fulfilled in that case the dependant worker will be entitled to record his name in the live roster . Here it has been established that on the date of death of the deceased worker the claimant/dependant worker was only 13 years old. Accordingly there was no scope at all to record his name in the live roster . Question of consideration of employment from the live roster only will arise according to qualification and competency by the management after the dependant attains the age of 18 years . Here in the instant case the concerned workman on the date of death of his father only was 13 years and accordingly there was no scope at all as per provision laid down in sub - clause iii of clause 9.5.0 of NCWA to record his name in the live roster. A dependant whose name is recorded in the live roster only is eligible to claim hisemployment on attaining the age of 18 years according to his qualification and competency . When the name of the dependant was not recorded in the live roster question of consideration of his employment does not arise . Here ithas been exposed clearly that as the dependant worker was below 15 years of age there was no scope on the part ofthe management to record his name in the live roster forconsideration ofhis name for employment on attaining his age of 18 years .
Incase ofdeath either in mine accident or for other reasons or medical unfitness under clause 9.4.0 if no employment has been offered and the male dependant of the concerned worker is 15 years and above in age he will bekept on a live roster and would be provided employment commensurate with his skill and qualifications when he attains the age of 18 years . During the period the male dependant is on live roster, the female dependant will be paid monetary compensation as per rates at par as ( i ) and (ii).
Therefore , question of recording the name of the dependant of the deceased worker in the live roster only will arise if on the date of death of the deceased worker the said dependant is 15 years and above in age . In view ofclear provision made in sub - clause ( iii) of clause 9.5.0 ofNCWA - V it is a pre - condition for recording the name ofthe dependant in the live roster' and the said condition is that on the date of the death of the deceased workman he is 15 years and above in age .
Therefore , before considering the claim of the dependant it has to be looked into if on the date of death ofthe deceased workman his dependant was 15 years and above in age or not.
Management with a view to substantiate their claim relied on the service excerpt of the deceased worker submitted by the sponsoring union . The said service excerpt was issued in the month of June , 1987. According to the Service excerpt marked as Ext. W- 4 it transpires that Israfil Khan in the month of June , 1987 was only 6 years old . Israil Khan died on 2-9-94 i.e on the date of his death Israfil Khan was approximately 13 years old. As per sub - clause III of 9.5.0 of NCWA - V it should be established that claimant worker should be 15 years above
Onbehalf of the concerned workman a decision reported in 2007 (9) Supreme Court cases has been filed. From perusal of the aforesaid judgement it appears that the facts and circumstances are different than the facts and circumstances of the decision filed in the aforesaid case.Accordingly the same is not being discussed in details as the same is not applicable in this case . However , it maybe mentioned that much argument has been advanced onbehalf of the concerned workmen referring Ext . W-3 that as per clause " Sa " there is mention of the fact by the management that her son who is aged above 15 years his name will be entered in the Live roster and will be provided employment after attaining the age of 18 years and in the mean time the wife of Israfil Khan will be paid compensation @ Rs . 2000 per month . In fact when she was offered job vide Ext . - 1 she had given application vide Ext . W -2 in connection of appointment of her son Md . Israil Khan and thereafter such communication was made by the competent authority. In this situation after receipt ofsuch order contained in Ext . W- 3 she agreed to receive compensation till the appointment of her son . After this the management had no option other than to appoint her son but the management had rejected her prayer for appointment of her son arbitrarily illegally and against the provision of NCWA . It may be mentioned that it is not in dispute regarding provision for appointment on compassionate ground . In the circumstances the employee Israfil Khan died. The only point of dispute is that the sonof Israfil Khan was not 15 years or above at the time ofdeath of the concerned employee and as per provision [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii) ]
the name of the son of the concerned employee can be entered in the live roster only if he is 15 years or above on the death of the concerned employee . From submission and petition vide Ext. W- 2 filed by the wife of the concerned employee it is stated that Md . Israil Khan was aged about 16 years but however, no any document evidence or other evidence has been brought on record by the concerned workman to establish the fact that the son of the deceased employee was 15 years or more on the date ofdeath of the concerned employee . This aspect of thematter has already been discussed and on consideration ofExt . W-4 the age recorded in the Service Excerpt it has been found that the son of the deceased employee was aged about 13 years . In this view of the matter his name could not be entered into Live Roster.
Ext. W-3 is a Cyclostyled and typed copy. Much argument has been advanced on behalf of the concerned workman that when Ext . W- 3 was issued the management was bound to act upon Ext . W- 3 providing employment to the son of the deceased employee. In the situation when the son ofthe deceased employee did not fulfil the criteria of age as required under the provision of NCWA for appointment on compassionate ground the management cannot be forced to give employment merely on the basis of the document Ext. W-3 . It may again be mentioned thatwhen the application was filed before the management after issuance of Ext . W-3 the matter was considered by the competent authority and the prayer for appointment ofthe son of the deceased employee has been rejected by the competent authority considering relevant aspect ofthe matter i.e. the age factor of the son of the deceased employee vide Ext . M - 3 . In this regard the submission made on behalf of the concerned workman does not show thathe is entitled for the relief as prayed for .
In view of the facts and circumstances discussed above I hold that there is no scope to consider employment of the petitioner workman on compassionate ground . In the result, the following Award is rendered :- - "The stand of the management of Bararee Colliery ofBCCL's denial of employment to Sri Israil Khan , S/o Late Israfil Khan is justified. Consequently, the said dependant is not entitled to get any relief. " NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 8 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2117.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ब्लू डार्ट एविएशन लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 54/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/8/ 2005- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी
4283
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
New Delhi , the 8th July, 2008
S.O. 2117. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref . No. 54/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M /s . Blew Dart Aviation Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 8-7-2008.
[No. L- 11012/8/2005 - IR ( C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT , CHENNAI
Wednesday, the 26th March , 2008 PRESENT :
K. Jayaraman, Presiding Officer
Industrial Dispute No. 54/2005
[Inthe matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. and their Workman]
BETWEEN
Sri V. Ramesh S/o K. Veerayyan No. 4 , Pillaiyarkoil Street Thirumalai Nagar Anagaputhur Chennai -600070
.... I Party/ Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Chief Human Resource Manager M/sBlue Dart Aviation Ltd. 88/89 , Old International Terminal , Meenambakkam Airport Chennai -600027
... 1st Respondent 2. M/ s Hi Tek Maintenance Rep. by its Proprietor No. 17, Nervannan II Street Lakshmipuram Chromepet Chennai - 600044
2ndRespondent 4284
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
APPEARANCE :
For the Petitioner
:K. Sivajothi
For the 1st Party Management : M/ s . T. S. Gopalan & Co.
For the 2nd Party Management : M/ s . Balan Haridas , R. Kamatchi Sundaresan .
AWARD
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 11012/ 8 /2005 - IR(C - I ) dated 2-6-2005 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is :
"Whether the demand of Sri V. Ramesh for reinstatement by the Management of Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. is justified ? If so , to what relief is the workman entitled ?"
2. The 2nd Party Respondent was impleaded subsequent to the filing of this ID. After the receipt ofthe Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it has 54/2005 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statement respectively.
3. The allegations in the Claim Statement are briefly asfollows :
attending to loading and unloading work. The Respondent registered itself as principal employer under Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act and the certificate of registration bears the date of registration as 24-1-2002 . The Contractor viz . the 2nd Respondent also obtained license under the said act . The Contractor is also covered under the ESI and EPF Act having its own code numbers . From the notice issued by the ALC( C) , the 1st Respondent came to know that the petitioner raised an Industrial Dispute and in that he averred that his services were terminated on 18-11-2004 . In that, the petitioner had shown the Contractor M/ s . Hitek Maintenance as a party to the dispute . The petitioner was not employed by this Respondent and he was employed by the Contractor viz . M/s.HitekMaintenance and it is the 2nd Respondent who is to answer the claim of the petitioner . In the reply, the 2nd Respondent viz . M/s . Hitek Maintenance alleged two of its employees who were working in the premises of the 1stRespondent were directed to go to the premises of this Respondent in Indian Airlines Stadium and they refused to go and work. Further , they have also prevented the other workmen on that day . Even though , the 2nd Respondent has sent letters to report for duty , the petitioner has never turned up . After considering the merits and demerits , the ALC ( C) submitted his conciliation failure report to the Government that the petitioner was not employed in the service of the 1st Respondent and he was only employed in the 2nd Respondent , hence for all these reasons, the 1st Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
5. The 2nd Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged:
The petitioner joined the services of the 1st Respondent as a Loader on 8-9-1997 . He was also asked to work as baggage identification at present Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. , which is operating flights from Madras to foreign countries . While so, he was illegally denied employment w.e.f. 18-11-2004 orally without any notice of termination . The petitioner completed 480 days of continuous service and he is entitled for permanency . While so , 1st Respondent after illegal termination of the petitioner had retained his juniors in service which is in violation ofSection- 25G & H. Further, the 2nd Respondent has not given any notice of termination and violated the mandatory provisions of Section - 25 (F) . Therefore, the petitioner raisedthe dispute against the Respondents for reinstatement and consequential relief.
4. The 1st Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged as follows:
The 2nd Respondent was awarded contract to supply manpower for certain jobs by the 1st Respondent . The 1st Respondent and the 2nd Respondent have also registered their names under the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act as the principal employer and contractor respectively. For supplying of contract labour, the 2nd Respondent engaged the petitioner and certain other employees . The said workman was deputed on 18-11-2004 to attend to the work in Indian Airlines Airport Stadium. Further, he failed to do the work alongwith certain other employees and further the petitioner had informed that he is no longer interested to work with the 1st Respondent . Even after the letter dated 20-11-2004 calling upon the petitioner to report for work, the petitioner failed to come for work. The 2nd Respondent has not terminated the services of the petitioner , it is the petitioner who has stayed away from work . The 2nd Respondent came to know that the petitioner has taken better employment and he is gainfully employed and that is why he has not reported for duty. Since he was not terminated , the allegation of the violation of Section- 25G and H of the ID Actdoes not arise . The allegation of violation of Section 25 - F is also without any substance . Hence for all these reasons , TheRespondent undertakes transportation of cargo by aviation and it has an establishment in Chennai and it is owning 7 Aircrafts . The contract of loading and unloading of cargo at Airport ( on the tarmac) has to be carried out during night and early morning and apart from flexible of operation and the manpower required would also vary depending on the volume of cargo to be handled. Since 1998 , this Respondent entered into a contract with M/ s . Hitek Maintenance for supply of manpower for भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रवण 11 , 1930
[भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]
the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed withcosts.
6.When the matter was pending before this Tribunal for adjudication, both sides have filed a joint memo of agreement wherein they have stated during the pendency ofthe dispute, the parties had direct negotiations and have arrived at a settlement to the effect that the 2nd Respondent will pay to the petitioner a sum of Rs . 22,500 for full and final settlement of all his claim against both the Respondents including the claim of Gratuity, earned wages , etc. and the petitioner have no claim either against the 1st or the 2nd Respondent on receipt of the amount and further they prayed an award may be passed in terms of this joint memo . The petitioner was present and the Respondent were represented by their Advocates , both parties have signed in the joint memo and the petitioner has admitted that he has received the cheque for the payment ofmoney and an award may be passed in terms ofthe joint memo. The joint memo was recorded.
Point for determination is :
To what relief is the petitioner entitled ?
7. As I have already stated that both sides have entered into an agreement and joint memo was filed before this Tribunal and it is also admitted by the petitioner that an award may be passed in terms of joint memo and the petitioner has also stated that he has received the cheque for the amount mentioned in the joint memo and he has no grievance against both the Respondents . I find the compromise is for the benefit of the petitioner . As such, an award is to be passed in terms ofjoint memo. The joint memo forms part of the record.
8. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly.
4285 लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औधोगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय ( सं.- II ) , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 121/1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/16/1996- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 8th July, 2008
S.O. 2118.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 121/1997 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No - II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofM/s . Air India Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 8-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/16/ 1996- IR (C- I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- II , NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I. D. No. 121/1997 IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh. Ajay Dixit,
H-38 - B, Arjun Apartment, Vikas Puri ,
Claimant NewDelhi
(Dictated to the P.A. transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 26th March, 2008)
K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer Witness Examined :
: None Forthe 1st Party/Petitioner
None For the 2nd Party/Management :
Documents Marked
On the Petitioner's side
Nil
On the Management's side
Nil
नई दिल्ली, 8 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2118.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . एअर इंडिया 2745 GI/08-30
Versus
The Sr. Personnel Manager,,
Air India,
HimalayaHouse,
K.G. Marg,
New Delhi
Respondents
AWARD
TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 11012/ 16/96- IR(C- I) Central Government dtd. 14-8-1997 has referred the following point for adjudication :
The point runs as hereunder:-
"Whether the demand of Shri Ajay Dixit, Ex . Jr. Operator that his services be reinstated by the management of Air India is legal and justified ? If so, to what relief is the workman entitled ?" 4286
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
leavehad been sanctioned to him or not. Despite all this a false and incorrect charge was levelled against him.
That the enquiry conducted against the applicant is inname sake only as the same was ex parte and the enquiry is against the principles of natural justice.
The workman applicants has filed claim statement. In the claim statement it has been stated that the humble applicant was employed as Junior Operator in Airport Service Department of the Respondent as a Jr. Operator (Trainee) w.e.f. 1-3-1980 and after successful completion ofprobation was confirmed on 1-10-1981 .
It had always been the endeavour of the applicant to render the services to the best of the ability and to serve the respondent as a faithful , honest and loyal employee .
That the services of the applicant had also been appreciated and he had also been issued a letter of appreciation dated 22 June , 1983 .
It is stated that the Enquiry Committee had fixed the first date as 15-11-1990 . But the letter/Communication issued by the Enquiry Committee reached the applicant only on 22-11-1990 . The applicant could not therefore have appeared on the said date and the said date is to be regarded for all purposes as non existence as there was no lapse on the part of the applicant . The lapse, if any, was on the part of the officers of the Respondent or the Respondent.
Thatunfortunately the applicant had been suffering from illness diagnosed Lumbar Spondylesis , Osteophyte formation. This was detected first by Dr. O. P. Bhardwaj in the year 1987 .
That it was only on 11-12-1990 that the applicant received intimation of the date next fixed which was 14-12-1990 . The applicant was then at bed rest. The applicant had intimated the Enquiry Committee about his illness alongwith good and relevant medical evidence.
The humble applicant got treatment for this treatment from the doctors on the panel of the Respondent too and had submitted the relevant medical certificates from time to time.
The Enquiry Committee had then fixed 17-1-1991 , the intimation whereof was received by the applicant on 12-1-1991 . This was the first date on which the applicant could have appeared and the applicant did appear on the said date .
That all the authorities concerned with the matter were apprised of the illness and the officers knew that the applicant was suffering. This position is clear from the attendance sheet (and not punch card) .
The applicant submits a copy of the medical certificate issued by Dr. Katria submitted on 5-10-1990 which was duly received by the Respondent.
That the applicant submitted an application for adjournment on genuine and valid reasons but the very first adjournment was refused wrongfully was that the applicant could not arrange defence counsel on that date . The applicant is not a legal man and could not have faced the enquiry without the assistance of a defence counsel as was to be allowed under the Rules .
That thereafter the applicant was referred to Dr. S.P. Mandal by Air India and the applicant remained under histreatment from 15-1-1990 to 5-3-1990 . But even for thatperiod , the applicant was treated as on unauthorized leave.
That even though the applicant was present on that day, the Enquiry Committee wrongfully chose to proceed with the matter ex parte .
That the applicant remained under the treatment of the doctors on the panel upto 23-8-1991 .
That the Enquiry Committee examined two witnesses but did not give an opportunity to the applicant to cross -examine them thereby acting contrary to the very basic principles of natural justice and holding of the enquiry.
Thatthe applicant had also submitted all the medical certificates to the Respondent vide letter dated 21-3-1991 . Therefore factually, as well as per the records available with the Respondent, the applicant remained on medical leave. Hence there was no question of the applicant being guilty of any misconduct . The leave/absence , if any, was not habitual but was owing to illness .
Whenthe applicant recovered , he had been regular in attending to his duties since April , 1991.
That furthermore the Enquiry Committee after recording the statements ofthose two witnesses , for which no opportunity was given to cross - examine , did not give any date for defence evidence . Thus , there was on the while total violation of the basic principles of holding enquiry and natural justice.
That the Enquiry Committee did not at all apply its mind or took into consideration the reasons for obtaining leave and the Respondent too deliberately and malafidely suppressed all those records .
That the applicant did not know whether the leave had been sanctioned to him or not . As per the practice , the only source of information to the humble applicant was the leave card which was not supplied to him since 8-6-1989. It was only in April, 1991 , that the leave card was issued to the applicant on his repeated requests . In absence thereof, the applicant never knew whether the
That besides the above , the officer passing the order of punishment , i.e. , dismissal did not take into 4287 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii) ]
consideration the good conduct/appreciation letters etc. issued to the applicant which was a must .
certificate whenever more than two days sick leave is availed . It is further submitted that the claimant has failed to comply with these provisions and remained absent and failed to regularize the absence .
That the order ofdismissal was passed by an officer who was not authorized under the Rules to pass such an order. It was not passed by the Appointing Authority . The applicant calls upon the Respondent to produce the rules/ Regulations as existing at that time for this purpose .
It is submitted that the claimant was a habitual absentee and his performance was far from satisfactory. The claimant was charge sheeted several times for remaining unauthorisedly absent. It is submitted that the letter of appreciation dated 22-6-1993 was issued to all the employees and the same recorded the progress made by the employees collectively and not individually .
That in any event the punishment imposed is so harsh , so excessive , that the same should not have been imposed in any case . Therefore , without prejudice to the other grounds the order ofdismissal needs to be set aside.
That the applicant had submitted an appeal the decision whereofhas not yet been received. In view ofthe pendency of a writ petition, the Management did apply for approval and no doubt approval has been granted by the National Industrial Tribunal but still this reference needs to be decided as the scope of approval application isquite different .
It is further submitted that as per records the claimant was recommended leave as and when requested by him after sympathetically considering his case . He was recommended leave for 37 days during the period from 7-6-1990 to 13-6-1990 , 10-12-1990 to 2-1-1991 and 20-3-1991 to 26-3-1991 . However , during the period when he had produced the certificates of his family physician the leave could not be granted as the certificates were not acceptable to the management since they were not supported by any supporting documents .
In any event, it is also stated that the charge was baseless and wrong . Furthermore, the expression habitual absence does not cover the cases when the employee becomes unable to attend owing to illness . Habitual absence is a habit and illness is a disease which needs to be medically treated and this is the reason that even the Respondent has a panel of doctors for giving treatment to ailing employees .
Having regard to all the facts and circumstances of the case, it is stated that the demand of the workman to be reinstated is legal and justified and the applicant should be ordered to be reinstated in service with full costs and full wages , allowances , service benefits .
It is further submitted that as per the Air India Service regulations sick leave for a period exeeding 2 days shall be supported by a medical certificate ofthe company's Medical Officer. It is further submitted that the management had as per the circulars had clearly stated that staff in the event of having exhausted the sick leave as admissible under Service Regulations is required to produce Medical Certificate from the authorized Medical Practitioner even for a day's sickness . Further , if staff avails sick leave upto 2/3 days after exhausting sick leave to his/her credit these leave will now be regularized at the Department level on production of Medical Certificate from the authorized Medical Practitioner.
It is further submitted that as per the circular in case an employee avails sick leave beyond 3 days the Medical Certificate is required to be countersigned by the Medical Officer of the Company and no staff would be allowed to join duties without production of fitness certificate whenever more than 2 days sick leave is availed .
Itissubmitted that as and when his request for leave was supported by medical certificate and endorsed by company's Medical Officer , the same was granted to the claimant. However , he remained absent on numerous occasions . It is submitted that the claimant was governed by Air India Employees .
TheManagement has filed written statement. Inthe written statement it has been stated that the services of the management in accordance with the provisions of law. It issubmitted that the claimant was charge sheeted dated 16-5-1990 for his habitual absence for a period of 162 days during the period between March , 1989 to February, 1990. The management had constituted an enquiry committee to enquire into the charges levelled against the claimant . It is submitted that during the enquiry proceeding the claimant was held guilty. The management therefore awarded the punishment of dismissal from service . It is further submitted that the punishment imposed by the management is proportionate to the misconduct committed by him. In view of the above submission , the claim filed by the claimant is liable to be dismissed.
The workman applicant has filed rejoinder. In the rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement . The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement.
Evidence of both the parties has been taken.
It is further submitted that the claimant has violated the provisions of the service regulation. As per the rules in case any employee takes sick leave beyond three days is required to get the medical certificate counter signed by the Medical Officer of Air India. No staff would be allowed to join duties without production of fitness 4288
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008/SRAVANA 11 , 1930 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.
part ofhis service conditions and contract of employment. He was liable to furnish relevant medical certificates after the endorsement of medical officer on panel of the management .
It was submitted from the side of the workman that he was appointed on 1-3-1980 as Trainee, Jr. Operator and his services were confirmed on 1-10-1981 . The workman has been suffering from illness Lumbar Spondylsis , Deteophyte formation . That the workman got treatment from the Drs . On the panel of the Respondent No. 2 and submitted the relevant medical certificates from time to time .
The management did not receive any medical certificate from the workman . The workman did not regularize his absence and his illness was not of such a nature that he was advised bed rest for such long periods. He was a habitual absconder and remained absent un- authorisedly on several occasions .
Itwas further submitted that the claimant was granted adjournment again and again during the course of inquiry on valid and genuine reasons . He has no defence . He sought adjournment only to delay the proceedings . He was given several opportunities to participate in the inquiry . He did not participate in the inquiry proceedings so the inquiry was held ex-parte. The inquiry is fair and valid . Principles of natural justice have been followed. Punishment is proportionate to the mis- conduct of the workman .
The applicant was referred to Dr. S.P. Mondal by Air India and he remained under his treatment from 15-1-1990 to 5-3-1990 but the applicant was treated as onunauthorized leave for that period also. The workman remained under the treatment of Dr. on the panel of Air India upto 31-8-1991 . He has submitted all his medical certificates on 30-1-1991 along with application . The workman as per even the management's record remained on medical leave hence there is no question of un- authorized absence and holding inquiry for the same. He hadbeen regular in attending the duties since April , 1991 . In April, 1991 leave card was issued to the applicant on his repeated request . The applicant did not know whether leave has been sanctioned or not . The workman intimated the inquiry committee about his illness along with relevant medical certificates .
The workman has annexed medical certificates of the Doctors ofthe management as well as Private Doctors . These certificates establish that the workman was suffering from Lumbar Spondylsis , Deteophyte formation. He has submitted certificates of the Medical Officer of the management just as Dr. V. K. Kataria and Dr. Mondal. The Doctors have prescribed him bed rest and the workman has submitted all the medical certificates to the management . He has filed all the certificates on the record also so, it cannot be said that the workman remained absent without any illness .
Itwas further submitted that the applicant was present , but the Inquiry Committee proceeded ex -parte. He was not provided opportunity to cross - examine the witnesses . No date for defence evidence has been given as inquiry was conducted in absolute violation of basic principles of natural justice.
Itwas further submitted that the order of dismissal was passed by the Officer who was not authorized under the Rule to pass such order . It was not passed by the Appointing Authority.
It further becomes quite obvious from perusal of the chargesheet that the workman was absent for 162 days from March , 1989 to February , 1990 and the management treated him as unauthorized absence and chargesheet was issued to him. The workman has filed medical certificates for the period of his medical treatment .
The punishment imposed is harsh. The appeal filed bythe workman has not been decided so far .
The management witness has admitted as under :
"It is correct that leave cards are issued to a workman for obtaining leave by him ....... it is wrong to say that the medical certificates of the workman were ignored by the Inquiry Officer . "
Itwas submitted from the side of the management that the claimant has violated the provisions of the service regulations . Fair inquiry was held to inquire into the charges of unauthorized absence of the workman . The inquiry committee found him guilty of unauthorized absence and the competent authority awarded punishment proportionate to the misconduct committed by the workman.
The witness is shown photocopy of medical certificate of fitness annexure-A filed by - the workman and have been marked as Ann . A- 3 and A-4 and the witness is asked to tell whether the endorsement made on theback of the certificates bearing rubber stamp , he could not tell whether the certificates were received by the department concerned or not.
Itwas further submitted that the workman was a habitual absconder . The workman was sanctioned leave as and when requested for the same along with medical certificate endorsed by the Company's Medical Officer was granted. The services of the workman is governed by AirIndia Employees Services Regulations which formed
The witness states that since he has never been told about the receipt of the certificate by the department concerned. It is wrong to say that the inquiry against the 4289 [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
forunauthorized absence for which he has filed medical certificatesof competent Doctor of Air India itself.
workmanwas held without giving him proper opportunity I am unable to tell whether on the relevant time there was sufficient leave, sick leave , casual leave and personal leave available in the leave account of the workman or not .
From perusal ofthe records it becomes quite obvious that the workman was suffering from acute disease of Lumbago and he was not in a position to stand due to acute pain. The Doctor on panel ofAir India recommended him rest but still the management has illegally removed the workman on the grounds of unauthorized absence .
From perusal of the statement of this witness it becomes quite evident that leave cards were issued to the workman to regularize leave sanctioned to him in April, 1991 .
Itistrue that no leave can be claimed as a matter of right but it is also true that when an employee submits applications supported by duly issued medical certificate ofthe competent Doctor , sick leave cannot be refused.
The management has not filed any document to show that the applications filed by the workman along with medical certificates have been rejected by the management. It appears that the management kept on keeping the medical certificates and applications of the workman and did not try to get either leave sanctioned or refused . No communication to the workman was made whether his medical leave was sanctioned or rejected.
In the circumstances stated hereinabove , the workman did not know that medical leave to him has been sanctioned and after obtaining fitness certificate of the Doctor ofAir India, the workman resumed his duties .
In the instant case the charge-sheet regarding un- authorized served upon the workman is absolutely illegal .
In the instant case the leave cards were not supplied to the workman from 8-6-1989 . It was only in April , 1991 that the leave cards were issued to the applicant on his repeated request. It also becomes quite obvious that the workman was under the treatment of Dr. S. P. Mondal , Dr. on panel of Air India from 15-1-1990 to 5-3-1990 whereas the charge- sheet has been issued to the workman regarding his absence in January and February 1990 whereas this workman admittedly was under treatment ofDr. S. P. Mondal , Doctor on panel of Air India from 15-1-1990 to 5-3-1990. The charges are fabricated in view of the medical certificates of Dr. Mondal . The workman was under medical treatment of, Dr. on panel of Air India from 15-1-1990 to 5-3-1990 and he has applied for medical leave along with medical certificates of Doctors of the management. The management witness has not denied that the application of the workman along with medical certificates were not received by the management . So the charge-sheet issued for absence from January, 1990 to February, 1990 becomes absolutely false as the workman was under the treatment of Dr. on panel of Air India and he has submitted medical certificates of that Doctor .
It also becomes quite obvious from perusal of the records that the workman has submitted all the medical certificates vide his letter dated 21-3-1991 and he joined duty inApril, 1991 and leave cards were issued to him.
It is true that as per the rules of Air India it is the duty ofthe workman to get his leave regularized and to get it entered into leave card. The workman could notdo itas the leave cards were issued to him in April 1991 and the officers ofthe management did not make any mention ofhisapplications for leave along with medical certificates ofthe competent Doctor.
As per the provisions of the service rules , the workman should get his leave regularized but leave cards were not issued to this workman, so he could not get his leave regularized.
Fromperusal of the inquiry proceedings it becomes quite obvious that the workman was present on 14-12-1990 and he sought adjournment on reasonable grounds but the inquiry officer held that the reasons are not convencing and he proceeded ex -parte and he concluded the inquiry on 7-1-1991 . Mr. M. C. Gulati , Office Assistant presented attendance records of the workman for the period from March 1989 to 1990. The workman was absent for 162 days . The Inquiry Officer asked Mr. Gulati whether Sh . Ajay Dixit, the workman contacted him at any time for regularizing his absence.
The management witness has not denied that sick leave was not due . It appears that the officers of the management went on keeping all the applications along with medical certificates but did not mention the same in the leave cards . The management found the workman. absent as medical application of the workman have not been entered in his leave cards and medical leaves were not sanctioned to him despite the fact that he remained under the treatment of Doctors , on panel of Air India & Doctors issued him certificate from 15-1-1990 to 5-3-1990.
The charge-sheet dated 16-5-1990 has been issued in disregard of the workman being on medical leave recommended by the Doctor on panel of Air India . The workman was working at that time . He has been charged
Itbecomes quite obvious from perusal of the inquiry proceedings that the entire inquiry was concluded on 7-1-1991 whereas the workman had moved application for adjourning the proceedings . The Inquiry has been conducted hurriedly in the absence of the workman . The workman has not been given any opportunity to adduce his own evidence .
4290
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]
competent authority to award punishment . The management witness has stated as under :-
"I am unable to tell whether Dy. Controller authority was actual competent authority of the workman to initiate disciplinary proceedings . "
Itis settled law that even in ex-parte proceedings , various provisions of the statutory rules prescribing procedural requirement have to be complied with . It was the duty of the Inquiry Officer that after taking the evidence of Mr. Gulati, Office Assistant to issue notice to the workman for adducing evidence in defence . No such opportunity has been given to the workman .
"It is correct that show cause notice to the workman was issued by the Dy. Controller , AAI , competent authority to issue show cause notice ."
It has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 1988 ( 4) SCC 619 that the basic principles that it is for theprosecutionto prove his case does not get whited down even in a case where inquiry is held ex - parte . In such cases the responsibility of the inquiry officer is very much more and he has to take extra caution in drawing the conclusion .
From perusal of the statement of this witness , it becomes quite obvious that the Dy . Controller was not competent authority for awarding punishment to the workman . Air India Service Rules have been annexed with the record. it is admitted that the workman was junior Operator in Ground Handling Department.
From perusal of the Service Rules , it becomes quite obvious that Controller Ground Handling is the competent authority for holding inquiry and awarding punishment to the employees of the workman's category and the Managing Director is the AA .
It cannot be said in the facts and circumstances of the case that delinquent official willfully absented himself. The next date of the inquiry was given 17-1-1991 . The workman was present on 14-12-1990 . He sought adjournment on the illness grounds but the inquiry officer concluded the inquiry proceedings on 7-1-1991 after taking leave card of the workman whereas leave card of the workman has not been supplied to him at the time of inquiry.
In the instant case, punishment has been awarded by the Dy. Director, Controller Ground Handling is the competent authority to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the workman but neither the proceedings have been initiated by the Controller of Ground handling nor punishment has been awarded by the Controller Ground Handling.
Itappears that the Inquiry Officer proceeded hurriedly . He should have granted atleast one more adjournment . He should have atleast sent notice to the workman for adducing evidence in his defence and all hismedical certificates and leave applications should have been considered by the Inquiry Officer .
In the circumstances punishment awarded by the Dy. Director is without jurisdiction , Controller Ground Handling is the competent authority for initiating disciplinary proceedings against the workman .
Ithas been held in AIR 1968 SC 266 that the rules ofnatural justice will have to be observed in the conduct ofa domestic inquiry against a workman. The workman must be given opportunity to examine himself and adduce any other evidence that he might choose in support of his plea but in the instant case no such opportunity to the workman for examining himself or adducing evidence in defence has been given.
It has been held in AIR 1961 AC 1629 that in case the inquiry is not according to the principles of natural justice and reasonable opportunity to defend has not been givento the workman such violation vitiates the inquiry.
In the instant case , the workman sought adjournment for one more date . Adjournment was not granted to him and the inquiry officer has concluded the inquiry on only one date . No opportunity for defence evidence has been given to the workman . Thus , principles of natural justice have not been observed and the inquiry stands vitiated.
The Dy . Director has initiated the disciplinary proceedings . The management witness has stated in his cross -examination that he is unable to tell whether Dy. Controller Authority was actually competent authority of the workman to initiate the disciplinary proceedings as such the disciplinary proceedings have been initiated by an in- competent authority. The workman has annexed Air India Employees Service Regulations . At page 56 two authorities have been mentioned as competent authority for ground handling . Controller Ground Handling & Sr. Dy. ControllerGround Handling . No other authority has been mentioned for initiating departmental proceedings and inflicting punishment . Managing Director and Controller Ground Handling are the Appellate Authority. The appeal has not been disposed of. The proceedings have been initiated and punishment has been inflicted by Dy. Controller authority . There is no such authority in Air India Employees Service Regulation . The Hon'ble Supreme Court in ( 1975) 3 SCR page 6919 has held that the regulation have the force of law and the employees are entitled to the declaration of being in employment with their dismissal or removal in contravention of the It also becomes quite obvious that the punishment has been awarded to the workman by the Dy . Controller and it has been alleged that the Dy . Director was not the [ भाग II-खंड 3(ii) ]
4291
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
New Delhi, the 8th July, 2008 regulation. It has beeh also held in this case that failure toobserve requirement of the regulation by statutory bodies is enforcedby courts by declaring the dismissal in violation ofrules and regulations be void .
S.O. 2119.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 77/2001/96) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . CCL Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 8-7-2008 .
[No. L-26012/ 591 /2000- IR (C- I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
Inthe instant case inquiry has not been initiated by the competent authority and the punishment also has not beeninflictedby competent authority. Air India Employees Service Regulation is 1982 has the force of law. No change in regulation has been brought to my notice . These regulations have force of law as per the judgment ofthe Hon'ble Constitution Bench cited above . The inquiry has been initiated and punishment has been awarded in violation of rules and regulations , so the inquiry proceedings and the punishment imposed consequent to that is void.
The inquiry and the punishment stand vitiated on this ground alone .
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO . 2) AT DHANBAD PRESENT :
Shri Nagendra Kumar , Presiding Officer
Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section10 (1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act, 1947
Reference No. 77 of 2001 It has been held earlier that ex - parte inquiry has been conducted in the absence of the workman and no fair opportunity for adducing defence evidence has been given to the workman . The inquiry stands vitiated as principles of natural justice have not been observed by the in-competent Disciplinary Authority .
PARTIES :
Employers in relation to the management of M/ s . CCL and their workman
APPEARANCES :
The workman has filed affidavit that he has been unemployed all along . The management has filed no proof ofthe employment of the workman elsewhere . In the facts and circumstances of the case the workman is entitled to reinstatement with full back wages .
The reference is replied thus :-
Onbehalf of the Workman
: Mr. D. Mukherjee , Advocate
Onbehalf of the
: Mr. D.K. Verma , Advocate
Employer
State : Jharkhand
Industry: Coal
Dated : Dhanbad, 16th June, 2008
AWARD
The demand of Shri Ajay Dixit, Ex. Jr. Operator that his services be reinstated by the management of Air India is legal and justified . The management should reinstate the workman w.e.f. the date of his termination from services along with 100% back wages and with continuity of service within two months from the date of the publication of the award .
The award is given accordingly.
Date : 25-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 8 जुलाई , 2008
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this.Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L - 26012 /591 / 2000 - IR( C- 1 ) , dated the 16th March, 2001 :
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Sirka Colliery of M/ s . CCL Ltd. , in not providing employment to the dependent of late Balam Oraon is justified? If not, to what relief is the said dependant of the concerned workman entitled ? " का. आ. 2119.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . सी.सी.एल. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 77/2001/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 08-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-26012/591/ 2000- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ]
स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी
2. The case of the concerned workman in short is that late Balram Oraon was working as permanent P.R. Mazdoor since long with unblemished record of service .
4292
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008/SRAVANA 11 , 1930
appointment provided the application is made within 6 months from the death of the concerned workman and the dependent son cannot claim for employment if he is minor at the time of death of his father. The claim for appointment ofJagto Oraon is without any merit and liable summarily rejected and he is not entitled to get any relief.
4. In the rejoinder portion it has been stated that thecontents ofpara 3 , 4 , 5 , 6, 7 , 8 of W.S. ofthe concerned workman are incorrect and the same have been denied . About para 1 , 2, 9 it has been said that the same are not fully correct the further statement have been made to explain the matters . About rest paras it has been said that the same are incorrect and denied . It has also been stated that the allegation levelled against the management are false , baseless imiginary and the same are denied . The concernedperson is not entitled to get any relief.
5. On behalf of the dependent of the deceased workman a rejoinder has been filed. Statement made in para 2, 3 , 4 , 5, 6 , 7, 8 and 9 of the W.S. of the management are said to be false, mis - representation of the facts and the same are denied . It has also been reiterated that the dependent of the concerned workman immediately informed the management about the death demanding employment and the management had directed the dependent to submit application with the certificate of Mukhiya and B.D.O. It has also been stated to allege falsely that the dependent's claim of employment was made for the first time in the year 1998. It is also false to allege that the dependent was minor at the relevant time . It is false to allege that the claim of the dependent is without any merit and liable to the rejected.
6. POINTS TO BE DECIDED
He had reported to his duty on 23-8-95 . While he was returning to his home after completing his duty he was murdered and his dead body was recovered from the Railway Track on 24-8-95 . In these circumstances dependant of the deceased was not only entitled for employment but also workman's compensation. After recovery from grief and shock and poor Adivasi son viz . Jagto Oraon reported before the management for providing employment in accordance with the provision of NCWA and also on humanitarian ground . However , the management instead of providing employment directed him to produce various certificates such as dependent certificates, family relation certificate , character certificate, post- mortum report etc. The concerned Adivasi boy tried his best to obtain the aforesaid certificates at an early date. However , after obtaining the certificates he submitted all his papers before the management for his employment. The management rejected his prayer for employment vide letter dt . 31-3-99 though the concerned dependant was advised to wait for sometime. He also waited for the same . He had preferred an appeal but the management refused to reconisder his appeal vide letter dt. 4-4-2000 . Seeing no other alternative the concerned workman raised an industrial dispute before the ALC( C ) Hazaribagh which ended in failure and ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication . It has further been stated that the action of the management in not providing employment to the dependent son of Balram Oraon is not only justified and illegal but also against the principle of natural justice. Prayer has been made to answer the reference in favour of the workman and to give direction to the management to provide employment to the dependent ofBalram Oraon with retrospective effect with all arrears and wages and consequential benefits .
"Whether the action of the management of Sirka Colliery ofM/ s . C.C.L. Ltd. in not providing employment to the dependent of late Balram Oraon is justified? If not, to what relief is the said dependant of the concerned workman entitled ."
7. FINDING WITH REASONS
In support ofhis claim the dependant of the deceased has examined himself as WW - 1 . He has also filed documents which have been marked Ext. W- 1 to W-5 . The management has examined one witness U.P. Narayan as MW- 1 . Two documents viz . Ext . M- 1 and M- 2 (both with objection) have been brought on record beside this one more document has been filed and marked X for identification.
8. The evidence of the dependent of the deceased workman is that late Balram Oraon was his father . He is 28 years old. His father was minor/ loader at Sirka Colliery. On 23-8-95 his father was murdered. 10/15 days after that incident he reported this fact to the management . He submitted application for employment on compassionate 3.Management has filed W.S. - cum - rejoinder stating therein that in accordance with the principle of law the company has issued guideline for submission of application for compassionate employment in pursuance ofthe provision of NCWA within 6 months from the cause of section i.e. the death of the bread earning member of the family . If any application is made after 6 months from the death of the workman and the matter has to be forwarded to the H.Qrs . for consideration on existence of any special ground . In the instant case the concerned workman Balram Oraon met death on 24-8-95 and the concerned person. Jagto Oraon submitted his application 21-9-98 claiming employment as dependent son of late Balram Oraon . The reason in submission of application was that the dependent son of Balram Oraon was child at the time of his death of his father and he submitted his application when he became adult. There is no provision of reserving right for employment of minor as and when he become major. If any such rule exists the same is ultravires of the Constitutiton and null and void . The management can only consider compassionate case [भाग II-खंड 3 (ii ) ]
ground and for money . He has no paper to show that he submitted the said application to the management. At that time management had asked him to produce death certificate of father and certificate of last residence . He proved the death certificate of his father which is Ext. W- 1 . He has also proved Service Excerpt of his father marked as Ext . W- 1 and family identification certificate issued by B.D.O. Ext. W- 3 . This is the dependent certificate issued by Panchayat Office marked as Ext . W- 4. The caste certificate is marked as Ext. W-5 . He has further submitted that is demand is justified. He had submitted copies of the certificate mentioned above to the management in the year 1997. During cross-examination he has stated that it is not a fact that he submitted application for employment on 21-9-98 along with the document mentioned above . He sworn affidavit on 24-5- 97 and in the said affidavit he disclosed his age as 18 years . He has further denied the suggestion that he did not submit his application within one year from the date of death his father . He submitted all papers to the management in support of his claim within one year from the date of death of his father . He has denied that his claim is not justified and that he did not submit application with other papers within one year from the date of death ofhis father.
9. The evidence of the management as well as the document ofthe management will further be discussed in the light of the submission made on behalf ofboth parties .
10. This is not in dispute that the concerned deceased employee was not the workman of the management . It has also not been disputed that Jogta Oraon is not the dependent son of the deceased employee .
11. The first question has to be decided as to when thedependent son of the deceased employee had filed the application for appointment on compassionate ground.
12. In this context it will be relevant to mentioned that it is not in dispute that Balram Oraon father of the concernedperson had met death in August, 1995. From the evidence of WW- 1 it appears that he had applied for appointment on compassionate ground within time i.e. within one year of the death of his father . He has specifically denied the suggestion that he did not submit hisapplication after one year from the death of his father. However, from his evidence it appears that he had reported that fact of death of his father to the management and applied for appointment on compassionate ground and the management has asked him to produce some certificates mentioned above . At the same time he had stated that he has no paper to show that he had made application to the management . In fact during his evidence WW- 1 has not stated any specific date on which he had submitted application for appointment to the management. Not only this in the W.S. he has not mentioned any specific date on which he had submitted his application to the management . However, MW- 1 has stated that after his 2745 G1/08-31
4293
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
death (it appears concerned workman) his dependant had not applied immediately for appointment . One Jagto Oraon had applied for appointment after 3 years after the death of Balram Oraon . No specific contradictory fact has come during his cross - examination to show that his statement regarding the time of application is incorrect . It will be relevant to mention that the management has not brought the application filed by Jagto Oraon on record to show that the same was filed after three years after the death ofBalram Oraon . But in the facts and circumstances atleast the concerned workman ought to have been given the specific date on which he had made application but neither in the pleading nor in his evidence he has given any specific date as to when the dependent of the deceased workman had made application for appointment . There is no any other document to show that the time of submission of application by the dependant of the deceased employee . From the evidence in cross - examination of the dependant of the deceased employee it appears that he had sworn affidavit on 24-5-97 . Ifall these facts are taken into consideration it appears that the dependant of the deceased had atleast applied for appointment during the year 1998. From the facts and circumstances and evidence on record it appears that the dependent of the deceased employee had not submitted application for appointment within time as per circular/direction of the management which is 6 months from the date ofdeath of the concerned employee as stated by MW- 1 in examination- in - chief.
13. In fact from submission made on behalf of the Ld. Lawyer for the management it appears that the dependant of the deceased employee had not applied for appointment within time and beside this he was minor at the time ofdeath ofBalram Oraon and as per rule/circular/ law Jagto Oraon is not entitled for appointment on compassionate ground.
14. Now question arises what was the age of the dependent ofthe deceased employee at the time of death ofdeceased employee. WW- 1 Jagto Oraon in his evidence in chief has stated his age as 28 years . He has been examined on 1st September , 2005. MW- 1 has not said anything about the age of Jagto Oraon. However, Service excerpt marked as Ext . W- 2 of the deceased employee Balram Oraon shows the age of Jagto Oraon as 8 years and this Service excerpt appears to have been issued in June, 1987. If the age of Jagto Oraon is considered as per this Ext. W-2 it comes about 16 years at the time ofdeath ofhis father i.e. in August, 1995. Ext. W- 3 is the family certificate ofthe deceased employee which has been issued byB.D.O. of concerned block . In this document the age of Jagto Oraon has been shown as 18 years and this has been issued on 31-12-96 . If this age is taken into consideration the age of Jagto comes between 16-17 years atthe time ofdeath of his father . However , during cross- examination WW- 1 has stated that he has sworn an affidavit on 24-5-97 in which he has disclosed his age as 4294
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008 /SRAVAΝΑ 11 , 1930 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 18 years which appears contradictory to Ext. W- 2 and W-3 . However, the said affidavit has not been brought on record. In any case on the basis of age recorded in Ext. W-2 and W- 3 it appears that Jagto Oraon dependent of deceased employee was above 15 years on the date ofdeath ofhis father .
employment. However, Ld . Lawyer for the management has pointed out that there had been circular fixing time limit of 6 months for submitting application for appointment on compassionate ground which has subsequently been raised one year vide Ext . M - 2 . He has submitted that since the dependent of the deceased employee did not apply within one year rather he applied after three years hence in this circumstances he is not entitled for the employment as per Ext . M -2 .
15. Much argument on behalf of the management has been advanced that Jagto Oraon had applied for appointment on compassionate ground after 3 years after the death of his father. It appears that the application of Jagto Oraon was rejected on the ground that he had not applied within 6 months from the date of death of his father. Question arises what is the provision when the dependent of the deceased employee was minor on the date of death of his father .
20. In Reply the Ld. Lawyer for the dependent of the deceased employee has submitted that the aforesaid circular are not legal and have no statutory force as per decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2007 ( 115) FLR 427. He has submitted that since there is no time limit the NCWA, on the basis of this circular appointment on compassionate ground cannot be refused and Jagto Oraon is entitled for the relief as prayed for .
16. Ld. Lawyer for the dependent of the deceased employee has submitted that in the circumstances when the dependent of the deceased employee was more than 15 years and less than 18 years his name is entered in the live register of the management and he has to be provided employment after attaining the age of 18 years .
17. MW- 1 has stated that there is provision in NCWA if the dependent is more than 15 years and less than 18 years his name is entered in the live register on the application of the dependent. In brief Provision contained in clause 9.5.0 of NCWA reads as follows :-
21. The circular in which there is mention of time limited for one year appears to have been issued on 1-1-2002 . This also shows that earlier a circular on 12-12-95 was issued in which the period of 6 months for entertaining application was provided . So far as the instant case is concerned as mentioned above the dependent of the deceased employee appears to be minor at the time of death of his father , and he appears to have become major during the year 1998 when he submitted hisapplication . It appearspears that at the relevant time circular Ext. M -2 providing time limit for one year was not in force . It appears to have been issued on 1-1-2002 . All it appears that at the relevant time i.e. during 1998 the circular dt . 12-12-95 providing 6 months time has been relied on by the management .
"Compassionate appointment - clause 9.3.2 of NCWA- V-delayed appointment - if on the date of death of the deceased employee the male dependant is fifteen years old or above in age then he will be kept on live roster and would be provided employment commensurate with his skill and qualification when he attains the age of eighteen years-during the period the male dependant will be on live roster , the female dependant will be paid monetary compensation. "
18. The above provision shows that if male dependent is 15 years old or above his name will be kept in the live roster and will be provided employment as and when he attains the age of 18 years and the monetary compensation will be paid to the female dependent . This provision has not been disputed by the management.
22. From perusal of the judgement reported in 2007 (15) FLR 427 it appears that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has been pleased to hold that Circulardt . 12-12-95 was not statutory. In para - 17 of the above judgement it has been mentioned that the period of 6 months limitation prescribed in the Circular dt. 12-12-95 was not statutory. It is also not imperative in character . This aspect of the matter has been considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court while considering provision contained in NCWA - V while discussing the matter of appointment on compassionate ground. Further in para - 17 of the said judgement it has been mentioned as follows :-
Para 17
Wehave indicated herein before , that it is necessary for us to go into the question as to whether on the teeth of the provision of NCWA - V the respondent atall had any power to fix a time limit and thereby curtailing the right of the workman concerned . We would assume that even in such a matter , it had a right. But, even for the said purpose , keeping in view ofthe fact that the beneficial provision is made 19. As noticed above the age of Jagto Oraon is more than 15 years and less than 18 years on the date of death ofhis father. His name ought to have been enrolled in the live roster maintained by the manmanagement and he ought to have been given employment when he attains the age of 18 years . Above provision does not show that any application within 6 months has to be filed. The aforesaid provisiondoes not contain any time limit for submission ofapplication for employment. This fact has also been stated by MW- 1 in his cross -examination that in NCWA there is no time limited for submitting application for 4295 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
Court reported in JLJR- 2005 ( 293 ) . The relevant portion of the judgement reads as follows :-
"Compassionate appointment-Clause 9.3.2 of NCWA- V-delayed appointment if on the date of death ofthe deceased employee the male dependent is fifteen years old or above in age then he will be kept on live roster and would be provided employment commensurate with his skill and qualification when he attains the age of eighteen years during the period of the male dependant will be on live roster, the female dependent will be paid monetary compensation ."
25. So far as position of law is concerned the submission made on behalf of the deceased employee finds support from the above two judgement of the Hon'ble Court that in the present facts and circumstances of the case the name of male dependent ought to have been enrolled in the live roster and should have been provided employment on attaining the age of 18 years . It has already been mentioned that in the instant case at the relevant time there was no circular having statutory force limiting time for submission of application . Accordingly the following Award is rendered :
under a settlement, the ' State ' was expected to act reasonably. While so acting , it must provide for a periodof limitation which is reasonably. Apart from the fact that the period of limitation provided for inthe circular letter with a power of relaxation can never be held to be imperative in character , the matter should also be considered from the subsequent conduct of the respondent in so far as it had issued another circular letter in the year 2000 provding for filing of an application for appointment on compassionate ground within a period of one year . It may be that the said circular letter has prospective operation but even in relation thereto we may notice that whereas the said circular letter was issued upon holding discussion with the Unions , the circular letter of the year 1995 was unilateral one . Further more , in its letter dated 2/3-8-2000 it will bear repetition to state , expiry of the period of limitation was not taken as a ground rejecting his application . Underage and non- placement of his name in live roster are stated to be the reasons . It is , therefore , unfair on the part of the respondent to raise such a plea for the first time in itscounter-affidavit to the writ petition if he was under- age , definitely, it was obligatory on the part ofthe respondent to keep his name in the live roster. It was not done . "
"The action of the management of Sirka Colliery of M/s. C.C. Ltd. in not providing employment to the dependent of late Balram Oraon is not justified. Consequently the management is directed to provide employment to the dependent of deceased employee after observing necessary formalities within three months from the date of publication of the Award ."
NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 8 जुलाई, 2008
23. From perusal of the aforesaid judgement it appears that while the matter regarding circular dt . 3-8-2000 has its prospective operation. In the instant case circular relating to one year time, ifany has not been brought on record rather as said earlier one year time circular bearing No. PD/MP/9.3.2.02/01 dt . 1-1-2002 has beenbrought on record (Ext . M -2 ) . As mentioned earlier this circular does not appear to have any application in the present case . Thus the position of this case is that at the relevant time, time limit of 6 months as provided in the circulardt. 12-12-95 is not statutory having force of law and in this situation it appears that there was no time limit at the relevant time for submission of application for appointment on compassionate ground in accordance with the provision of NCWA .
का. आ. 2120.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी. सी.सी.एल. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 27/2000/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-20012/318/99- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 8th July , 2008
24. Ld. Lawyer for the deceased employee filed a decision of the Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court reported in 2005 (3 ) JLJR. From perusal of this judgement it appears that the Hon'ble Court have been pleased to hold that compassionate appointment-para 9.5.0 of NCWA- IV those who are minors at the time when their parents in. employment die , should be provided with employment once they attain majority-Scheme does not indicate that a minor has to apply within six months from the date of the deceased-petitioner case to be re- considered. Ld . Lawyer for the dependent of the deceased employee has filed another decision of the Hon'ble Jharkhand High
S.O. 2120.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 27/2000/97 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the 4296
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] employers in relation to the management of M/ s . BCC Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 8-7-2008 .
[No. L- 20012/ 318/99 - IR ( C- I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO . 2) AT DHANBAD
PRESENT :
Shri Nagendra Kumar , Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947
Reference No. 27 of 2000
PARTIES :
Employers in relation to the management of Bhowra (N) Colliery of M/s . BCCL and their workman
APPEARANCES :
On behalf of the Workman
: Mr. S.N. Goswami , Advocate
any stigma . During the course of employment the concerned workman was seriously ill suffering from Asthma and had undergone treatment from 25-12-1995 to 19-6-1996. As a result due to this situation beyond his control he could not report to his duty. After recovery from illness the doctor found him fit to resume his duty as usual from 20-6-96 and accordingly issued a Medical Certificate in this regard . The concerned workman with the Medical Certificate went to resume his duty on 20-6-96 and submitted the said Medical Certificate to the Management. But the management issued a Chargesheet on the same day which the concerned workman replied, on 21-6-96 . The concerned workman had replied begging apology undertaking not to commit such mistake in future . Thereafter a departmental enquiry was held in haste without giving reasonable opportunity . The sponsoring union raised the dispute before the ALC( C) Dhanbad which ultimately resulted in reference to this Tribunal for adjudication . He had submitted appeal before the management to resume his duty but the same was not considered. Copy of enquiry proceeding prior to imposing ofpunishment of dismissal was not supplied to him. The Project Officer of Bhowra (N) Colliery is not competent to issue dismissal Order . Prayer has been made to pass an Award in favour of the workman directing the managementto reinstate the concerned workman in his job with full back wages and consequential relief.
: Mr. U.N. Lal , Advocate
Onbehalf of the Employers
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated : Dhanbad , 18th June , 2008
AWARD
The Government of India , Ministry of Labour in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1) (d) of the I.D Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/ 318 /99 - IR ( C - I ) , dated the 28th January, 2000.
SCHEDULE
3. The management has also filed a W.S.- cum- rejoinder stating therein that the concerned workman Mariram Manjhi is a habitual absentee . Several charge- sheets were issued to him. The management gave him ample opportunity to improve himself but he did not improve in his attendance and in his performance . His past three years attendance is in 1993-127 days , 38 days in1994 and 153 days in 1995. The chargesheets were issued and the concerned workman was punished 10 days suspension was confirmed , two times warning and the concerned workman was kept on Badli roll . Further details have been given as to when and how the concerned workman was absenting on prior occasion for which he was awarded punishment. He is a habitual absentee and for this misconduct a chargesheet was issued against him and a departmental enquiry was held and thereafter punishment of dismissal was awarded.
"Whether the action of the management of Bhowra (N) U.G. Mines of M/ s . BCC Ltd. in dismissing Sri Mariram Manjhi from the services of the company w.e.f.. 10-9-96 is justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled? "
2. The concerned workman Mariram Manjhi has filed a W.S. stating that he is a permanent workman of Bhowra ( N) U.G. Mines/Colliery of M/ s . BCCL Area No. XI as D.C. Loader. During the long tenure of continuous service the concerned workman was performing his job maintaining his service record without
4. Inthe rejoinder portion further details have been given as to how the concerned workman was in the habit of being absent . Details have been given regarding submission of application to resume duty with medical certificate. Further details have been given as to how the concerned workman deserves the said punishment . Prayer has been made to pass an Award holding that the dismissal ofthe concerned workman w.e.f. 10-9-96 is just, fair and reasonable and the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief.
4297
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खंड 3( ii) ]
5. It appears that no rejoinder has been filed bythe concerned workman.
6. POINTS TO BE DECIDED
"Whether the action of the management of Bhowra (N) U.G. Mines of M/s . BCC Ltd. in dismissing Sri Mariram Manjhi from the services of the company w.e.f. 10-9-96 is justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled?"
7. FINDING WITH REASONS
During proceeding of this case the matter relating to the fairness and propriety of the domestic enquiry was considered. After hearing the matter and considering the enquiry proceeding papers marked as Ext . M- 1 to M - 7 the then Presiding Officer held that the domestic enquiry conducted by the Enquiry Officer against the concerned workman was fair , proper and in accordance with the principle of natural justice and the matter was kept for hearing on merit.
8. Ld. Lawyer for the concerned workman has submitted that the concerned workman absented from duty because he was ill and he was not in a position to resume duties forwhich he has also produced medical Certificate. He also undertakes that in future he will not commit such mistake . So a lenient view may be taken. He has further argued that Chargesheet Ext . M - 2 shows that the concerned workman was asked to submit explanation within 48 hours of the receipt of the chargesheet . In accordance with the Certified Standing Order of M/ s . BCCL for imposing punishment of dismissal 7 days time has to be given to furnish explanation but in the instant case 48 hours time was given to the concerned workman . Dismissal is a major penalty hence the order of dismissal will not stand for violation of the provision of Certified Standing order of M /s . BCCL . In this connection Clauses 27 and 29 of the Certified S.O. has been referred .
9. On the other hand Ld. Lawyer for the management has argued that on the basis of the material available on record it clearly appears that the concerned workman is a habitual absentee . On prior occasion he absented from duty and four times he was chargesheeted and punishment was awarded . This fact itself shows that he was not interested to work . Besides this the domestic enquiry has been held fair, proper and all opportunities were given to the concerned workman to defend himself. Therefore, the order of dismissal is fully justified and no interference is required. Clause 29.0 of the Certified Standing Order of M/ s : BCCL relates to the penalties for misconduct which reads as follows :-
Penalties for Misconduct.
Clause 29.0 Clause 29.1 The following penalties may, for good and sufficient reasons and as hereinafter provided, be imposed on a workman for misconduct , viz .
(i ) Minor penalties-
(a) Censure
(b) Fine in accordance with the P.W. Act , 1936 .
(c) Suspension without wages as substantive punishment for not more than ten days at a time.
(ii) Major penalties-
(a) Stoppage of increment.
(b) Reduction to a lower grade or post or a stage in a time scale.
(c) Dismissal or discharge from service.
10. So far as giving time for submission of explanation clause 27 of the said Certified S.O. reads as follows:-.
"Clause 27.0 Procedure for Dealing with The cases ofMisconduct .
Clause 27.1 Minor Penalty : Where a workman is charged with a misconduct which may lead to imposition of a minor penalty, he shall be informed in writing of the allegations made against him and shall be given an opportunity to explain his conduct within 48 hours . His explanation, if any shall be considered before imposing a minor penalty by the Disciplinary Authority . Provided , however, that where a workman denies the charges alleged against him , no punishment shall be imposed upon unless a domestic enquiry has been conducted.
Clause 27.2 Major Penalty : Where a workman is charged with a misconduct which may lead to the imposition of a major penalty, he shall be informed in writing of the allegations against him and shall be given an opportunity to explain his conduct within a period of 7 days . On receipt of a workman's explanation if it isdecided to proceed further , an enquiry shall be held . Such enquiry will be conducted by an officer other than the Officer who has either reported the alleged misconduct or issued the chargesheet . At the enquiry , the employee concerned shall be afforded reasonable opportunity of explaining 4298
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 8th July , 2008
and defending his conduct with the assistance of the follow workmen or Office bearer of the Trade Union of which he is a member if so requested by him. Where such enquiry relates to the alleged misconduct of several workman, the enquiry may be held for all the workmen together . "
S.O. 2121. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref . No. 56/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . Blue DartAviation Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 8-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/ 20/2005 - IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer ANNEXURE
11. From perusal of the aforesaid provision it appears that dismissal or discharge is a major penalty and for imposing major penalty the employees be given opportunity to explain his conduct within a period of 7 days . But in the instant case only 48 hours time has been given to the concerned workman for giving explanation and thereafter enquiry was held and the concerned workman was dismissed from service .
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Tuesday, the 25th March , 2008
PRESENT :
12. The order of dismissal of the concerned workman is not in accordance with the provision of the Certified Standing Order ofM/s . BCCL . The same cannot stand in the aforesaid circumstances .
K. Jayaraman, Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 56/2005 13. Accordingly the concerned workman is entitled to be reinstated in his original job but without any back wages as the relief has been given on technical ground for violation of the Standing Order.
14. In the result, the following Award is render-
ed:-
[In the matter of dispute for adjudication under clause (d ) ofsub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. and their Workman]
BETWEEN
Sri S. Suresh Kumar
S/o Dásanathan,
No. 1/139 , Mariyamman
Chennai -600074
... I Party/Petitioner
KoilStreet, Polichalur , Vs.
"The action of the management ofBhowra (N) U.G. Mines of M/ s . BCCL in dismissing Sri Mariram Manjhi from the services of the company w.e.f. 10-9-96 is notjustified. Consequently, the concerned workman is entitled to be reinstated in his original job from the date of his dismissal but without any back wages. However, he will be entitled continuity of service from the date of his dismissal to the date of reinstatement . "
1. The Chief Human Resource
Manager
Management is directed to implement the Award within three months from the date of its publication in the Gazette of India in the light of the observation made above.
M/s. Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. 88/89 , Old International Terminal , Meenambakkam Airport ,
Chennai - 600027
1stRespondent
2. M/ s . Hi Tek Maintenance
NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 8 जुलाई, 2008
Rep. by its Proprietor, No. 17 , Nervannan II Street, Lakshmipuram, Chromepet,
Chennai - 600044
2nd Respondent
APPEARANCE :
For the Petitioner : K. Sivajothi
का. आ. 2121.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . ब्लू डार्ट एविएशन लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 56/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
For the 1st Party Management : M/ s . T. S. Gopalan & Co.
2nd Party Management : M/ s . Balan Haridas , R. Kamatchi Sundaresan .
[सं. एल-11012/20/2005- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
AWARD
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 11012/20/2005 - IR( C- I) dated 2-6-2005 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is :
"Whether the demand of Sri S. Suresh Kumar for reinstatement by the management of Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. is justified ? If so , to what relief is the workman entitled ?"
2. The 2nd Party Respondent was impleaded subsequent to the filing of this ID. After the receipt of the Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it has 56/2005 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered through their Advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statement respectively.
3. The allegations in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :
The petitioner joined the services of the 1st Respondent as a Loader on 8-9-1997 . He was also asked to work as baggage identification at present Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. , which is operating flights fromMadras to foreign countries . While so, he was illegally denied employment w.e.f. 18-11-2004 orally without any notice of termination . The petitioner completed 480 days of continuous service and he is entitled for permanency. While so, 1st Respondent after illegal termination of the petitioner had retained his juniors in service which is in violation of Section -25G & H. Further, the 2nd Respondent has not given any notice of termination and violated the mandatory provisions of Section- 25(F) . Therefore, the petitioner raised the dispute against the Respondents for reinstatement and consequential relief.
4. The 1st Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged as follows:
TheRespondent undertakes transportation of cargo by aviation and it has an establishment in Chennai and it is owning 7 Aircrafts . The contract of loading and unloading of cargo at Airport ( on the tarmac) has to be carried out during night and early morning and apart from flexible of operation and the manpower required would also vary depending on thevolume ofcargo to be handled. Since 1998 , this Respondent entered into a contract with M/ s . Hitek Maintenance for supply of manpower for attending to loading and unloading work . The Respondent registered itself as principal employer under Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act and the certificate of registration bears the date of registration as 24-1-2002 . The Contractor viz . the
4299
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
2ndRespondent also obtained license under the said Act. The Contractor is also covered under the ESI and EPF Act having its own code numbers . From the notice issued by the ALC( C) , the 1st Respondent cametoknow that the petitioner raised an Industrial Dispute and in that he averred that his services were terminated on 18-11-2004 . In that, the petitioner had shown the Contractor M/ s . Hitek Maintenance as a party to the dispute . The petitioner was not employed by this Respondent and he was employed by the Contractor viz . M/s . Hitek Maintenance and itisthe 2nd Respondent who is to answer the claim ofthe petitioner. In the reply, the 2nd Respondent viz . M/s . Hitek Maintenance alleged two of its employees who were working in the premises of the 1st Respondent were directed to go to the premises of this Respondent in Indian Airlines Stadium and they refused to go and work. Further, theyhave also prevented the other workmen on that day. Even though , the 2nd Respondent has sent letters to report for duty, the petitioner has never turned up . After considering the merits and demerits, the ALC ( C) submitted his conciliation failure report to the Government that the petitioner was not employed in the services of the 1st Respondent and he was only employed in the 2nd Respondent , hence for all these reasons , the 1st Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
5. The 2nd Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged:
The2nd Respondent was awarded contract to supply manpowerwer for certain jobs by the 1st Respondent . The 1st Respondent and the 2nd Respondent have also registered their names under the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act as the principal employer and contractor respectively. For supplying of contract labour, the 2nd Respondent engagedthe petitioner and certain other employees . The said workman was deputed on 18-11-2004 to attend to the work in Indian Airlines Airport Stadium. Further, he failed to do the work alongwith certain other employees and further the petitioner had informed that he is no longer interested to work with the 1st Respondent . Even after the letter dated 20-11-2004 calling upon the petitioner to report for work, the petitioner failed to come for work . The 2nd Respondent has not terminated the services of the petitioner , it is the petitioner who has stayed away from work. The 2nd Respondent came to know thatthe petitioner has taken better employment and he is gainfully employed and that is why he has not reported for duty . Since he was not terminated, the allegation ofthe violation of Section- 25G and H of the IDAct does not arise. The allegation of violation 4300
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
ofSection 25 - F is also without any substance . There is no ID any adjudication . Hence for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
6.Whenthematter was pending before this Tribunal for adjudication, both sides have filed a joint memo of agreement wherein they have stated during the pendency ofthe dispute, the parties had direct negotiations and have arrived at a settlement to the effect that the 2nd Respondent will pay to the petitioner a sum ofRs . 15,500 for full and final settlement of all his claim against both the Respondent including the claim ofGratuity , earned wages , etc. and the petitioner have no, claim either against the 1st or the 2nd Respondent on receipt of the amount and further they prayed an award may be passed in terms of this joint memo . The petitioner was present and the Respondent were represented by their Advocates , both parties have signed in the joint memo and the petitioner has admitted that he has received the cheque for the payment of money and an award may be passed in terms of the joint memo . The joint memo was recorded.
Point for determination is :
To what relief is the petitioner entitled ?
7. As I have already stated that both sides have entered into an agreement and joint memo was filed before this Tribunal and it is also admitted by the petitioner that an award may be passed in terms of joint memo and the petitioner has also stated that he has received the cheque for the amount mentioned in the joint memo and he has no grievance against both the Respondents . I find the compromise is for the benefit of the petitioner. As such , anaward is to be passed in terms ofjoint memo . The joint memo forms part of the record .
8. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly .
(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day, the 25th March, 2008)
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer Witness Examined :
: None For the 1st Party/Petitioner
For the 2nd Party/Management : None Documents Marked :
On the Petitioner's side
Nil
On the Management's side
Nil
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 8 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2122.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ब्लूडार्ट एविएसन लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 55/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-11012/9/2005- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 8th July, 2008
S.O. 2122. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 55/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 8-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/ 9/2005 - IR (C - I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR, CHENNAI
Tuesday, the 25th March, 2008
PRESENT :
K. Jayaraman , Presiding Officer
Industrial Dispute No. 55/2005
(Inthe matter of dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofsub -section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , between the Management of Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. and their Workman)
BETWEEN
Sri U. Shanmugasundaram
S/o P. Umapathy
No. 13, 14th Street, Nehru Colony, Palavanthangal , Chennai - 600114
... I Party/Petitioner
Versus
1. The Chief Human Resource Manager M/s . Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. 88/89 , Old International Terminal , Meenambakkam Airport ,
Chennai - 600027
1stRespondent 4301 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
2. M/ s . Hi Tek Maintencance
Rep. by its Proprietor,
No. 17, Nervannan II Street ,
Lakshmipuram ,
Chromepet, Chennai -600044
2nd Respondent
APPEARANCE :
For the Petitioner
: K. Sivajothi
For the 1st Party Management : M/ s . T. S. Gopalan & Co.
2nd Party Management : M/s . Balan Haridas , R. Kamatchi Sundaresan
AWARD
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L - 11012 / 9/2005 - IR(C - I ) dated 2-6-2005 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is :
"Whether the demand of Sri U. Shanmughasundaram for reinstatement by the management of Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. is justified ? If so , to what relief is the workman entitled ?"
2. The 2nd Party Respondent was impleaded subsequent to the filing of this ID. After the receipt ofthe Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it has 55/ 2005 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statement respectively.
3. The allegations in the Claim Statement are briefly asfollows:
and it is owning 7 Aircrafts . The contract of loading and unloading of cargo at Airport (on the tarmac) has to be carried out during night and early morning and apart from flexible of operation and the manpower required would also vary depending on the volume of cargo to be handled. Since 1998 , this Respondent entered into a contract with M/s . Hitek Maintenance for supply of manpower for attending to loading and unloading work . The Respondent registered itself as principal employer under Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act and the certificate of registration bears the date of registration as 24-1-2002 . The Contractor viz . the 2nd Respondent also obtained license under the said Act. The Contractor is also covered under the ESI and EPF Act having its own code numbers . From the notice issued by the ALC(C) , the 1st Respondent came to know that the petitioner raised an Industrial Dispute and in that he averred that his services were terminated on 18-11-2004. In that, the petitioner had shown the Contractor M/ s . Hitek Maintenance as a party to the dispute . The petitioner was not employed by this Respondent and he was employed bythe Contractor viz . M/s . Hitek Maintenance and. itisthe 2nd Respondent who is to answer the claim ofthe petitioner. In the reply, the 2nd Respondent viz . M/ s . Hitek Maintenance alleged two of its employees who were working in the premises of the 1st Respondent were directed to go to the premises of this Respondent in Indian Airlines Stadium and they refused to go and work. Further, they have also prevented the other workmen on that day. Even though , the 2nd Respondent has sent letters to report for duty , the petitioner has never turned up . After considering the merits and demerits , the ALC( C) submitted his conciliation failure report to the Government that the petitioner was not employed in the service of the 1st Respondent and he was only employed in the 2nd Respondent, hence for all these reasons , the 1st Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
5. The 2nd Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged:
The petitoner joined the services of the 1st Respondent as a Loader on 8-9-1997. He was also asked to work as baggage identification at present Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. , which is operating flights from Madras to foreign countries . While so , he was illegally denied employment w.e.f. 18-11-2004 orally without any notice of termination . The petitioner completed 480 days of continuous service and he is entitled for permanency. While so, 1st Respondent after illegal termination of the petitioner had retained his juniors in service which is in violation of Section-25G & H. Further , the 2nd Respondent has not given any notice of termination and violated the mandatory provisions of Section- 25( F) . Therefore , the petitioner raised the dispute against the Respondents for reinstatement and consequential relief.
4. The 1st Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged as follows:
The 2nd Respondent was awarded contract to supply manpower for certain jobs by the 1st Respondent. The 1st Respondent and the 2nd Respondent have also registered their names under the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition ) Act as the principal employer and contractor respectively . For supplying of contract labour, the 2nd Respondent engaged the petitioner and certain other employees . The said workman was deputed on 18-11-2004 to attend to the work in Indian Airlines Airport Stadium . Further , he failed to do the work alongwith The Respondent undertakes transportation of cargo by aviation and it has an establishment in Chennai
2745 G1/08-32 4302
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
certain other employees and further the petitioner had informed that he is no longer interested to work with the 1st Respondent . Even after the letter dated 20-11-2004 calling upon the petitioner to report for work, the petitioner failed to come for work . The 2nd Respondent has not terminated the services of the petitioner , it is the petitioner who has stayed away from work . The 2nd Respondent came to know that the petitioner has taken better employment and he is gainfully employed and that is why he has not reported for duty. Since he was not terminated , the allegation of the violation of Section - 25G and H of the IDAct does not arise . The allegation ofviolation ofSection 25 -F is also without any substance. Hence for all these reasons , the Respondent prays thatthe claim may be dismissed with costs .
6.Whenthe matter was pending before this Tribunal for adjudication, both sides have filed a joint memo of agreement wherein they have stated during the pendency ofthe dispute, the parties had direct negotiations and have arrived at a settlement to the effect that the 2nd Respondent will pay to the petitioner a sum of Rs . 14,500 for full and final settlement of all his claim against both the Respondents including the claim of Gratuity , earned wages , etc. and the petitioner have no claim either against the 1st or the 2nd Respondent on receipt of the amount and further they prayed an award may be passed in terms of this joint memo . The petitioner was present and the Respondent were represented by their Advocates , both parties have signed in the joint memo and the petitioner has admitted that he has received the cheque for the payment ofmoney and an award may be passed in terms of the joint memo . The joint memo was recorded.
Point for determination is :
To what relief is the petitioner entitled ?
7. As I have already stated that both sides have entered into an agreement and joint memo was filed before this Tribunal and it is also admitted by the petitioner that an award may be passed in terms of joint memo and the petitioner has also stated that he has received the cheque for the amount mentioned in the joint memo and he has no grievance against both the Respondents . I find the compromise is for the benefit of the petitioner . As such , an award is to be passed in terms ofjoint memo . The joint memo forms part of the record .
8. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly.
(Dictated to the P.A. transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 25th March, 2008 )
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer .
Witness Examined :
For the 1st Party/Petitioner : None For the 2nd Party/Management : None
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ) ;
Documents Marked
On the Petitioner's side
Nil
On the Management's side Nil
नई दिल्ली, 8 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2123.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ब्लू डार्ट एविएशन लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 53/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं . एल -11012/7/2005- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 8th July , 2008
S.O. 2123. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 53/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Blue DartAviation Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 8-7-2008 .
[No. L- 11012/ 7 / 2005 - IR ( C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT , CHENNAI
Tuesday, the 25th March , 2008
PRESENT :
K. Jayaraman , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 53/2005
[In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub-section 2 ( A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , between the Management of Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. and their Workman]
BETWEEN
S/o Veerapathiran , No. 33 , Mariamman Koil Street ,
Kilaikaranai ,
MLL Rajapuram ( PO ) ,
Sri V. Perumal Chengalpattu -602304 ... I Party/ Petitioner Vs.
[भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
4303
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 2, 2008/श्रावण 11 , 1930
1. The Chief Human Resource Manager
M/ s . Blue Dart Aviation Ltd.
25 (F) . Therefore, the petitioner raised the dispute against the Respondents for reinstatement and consequential relief.
88/89 , Old International Terminal , Meenambakkam Airport,
4. The 1st Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged as follows :
Chennai - 600027
1stRespondent
2. M/ s . Hi Tek Maintenance
Rep. by its Proprietor,
No. 17 , Nervannan II Street ,
Lakshmipuram, Chromepet, Chennai -600044
2nd Respondent
APPEARANCE :
For the Petitioner
: K. Sivajothi
For the 1st Party Management : M/s . T. S. Gopalan & Co.
For the 2nd Party Management : M/ s . Balan Haridas , R.
Kamatchi Sundaresan .
AWARD
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 11012/ 7 /2005 - IR( C- I ) dated 2-6-2005 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .
The schedule mentioned in that order is :
"Whether the demand of Sri V. Perumal for reinstatement by the management of Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. is justified ? If so , to what relief is the workman entitled ?"
A 2. The 2nd Party Respondent was impleaded subsequent to the filing of this ID . After the receipt of the Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it has 53/2005 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statement respectively.
3. The allegations in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :
The Respondent undertakes transportation of cargo by aviation and it has an establishment in Chennai and itis owning 7 Aircrafts . The contract of loading and unloading of cargo at Airport (on the tarmac) has tobe carried out during night and early morning and apart from flexible of operation and the manpower required would also vary depending on the volume of cargo to be handled . Since 1998 , this Respondent entered into a contract with M/ s . Hitek Maintenance for supply of manpower for attending to loading and unloading work. The Respondent registered itself as principal employer under Contract Labour ( Regulation & Abolition) Act and the certificate of registration bears the date of registration as 24-1-2002 . The Contractor viz . the 2nd Respondent also obtained license under the said act . The Contractor is also covered under the ESI and EPF Act having its own code numbers . From the notice issued by the ALC(C) , the 1st Respondent came to know that the petitioner raised an Industrial Dispute and in that he averred that his services were terminated on 18-11-2004 . In that , the petitioner had shown the Contractor M/ s . Hitek Maintenance as a party to the dispute . The petitioner was not employed by this Respondent and he was employed by the Contractor viz . M/ s . Hitek Maintenance and itisthe 2nd Respondent who is to answer the claim of the petitioner. In the reply, the 2nd Respondent viz. M/ s . Hitek Maintenance alleged two of its employees who were working in the premises of the 1st Respondent were directed to go to the premises of this Respondent in Indian Airlines Stadium and they refused to go and work . Further , theyhave also prevented the other workmen on that day. Even though , the 2nd Respondent has sent letters to report for duty, the petitioner has never turned up. After considering the merits and demerits , the ALC( C) submitted his conciliation failure report to the Government that the petitioner was not employed in the service of the 1st Respondent and he was only employed in the 2nd Respondent, hence for all these reasons , the 1st Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
5. The 2nd Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged:
The petitioner joined the services of the 1st Respondent as a Loader on 8-9-1997 . He was also asked to work as baggage identification at present Blue Dart Aviation Ltd. , which is operating flights from Madras to foreign countries. While so , he was illegally denied employment w.e.f. 18-11-2004 orally without any notice of termination . The petitioner completed 480 days of continuous service and he is entitled for permanency. While so , 1st Respondent after illegal termination ofthe petitioner had retained his juniors in service which is in violation of Section-25G & H. Further , the 2nd Respondent has not given any notice of termination and violated the mandatory provisions of Section-
The 2nd Respondent was awarded contract to supply manpower for certain jobs by the 1st Respondent . The 1st Respondent and the 2nd Respondent have 4304
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930 [PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ]
8. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly.
(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 25th March , 2008 )
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer
Witness Examined :
: None
For the 1st Party/Petitioner
For the 2nd Party/Management : None
Documents Marked
On the Petitionér's side
Nil
On the Management's side Nil नई दिल्ली, 9 जुलाई , 2008 also registered their names under the Contract Labour ( Regulation & Abolition) Act as the principal employer and contractor respectively. For supplying of contract labour, the 2nd Respondent engaged the petitioner and certain other employees . The saidworkman deputed on 18-11-2004 to attend to the work in Indian Airlines Airport Stadium. Further, he failed to do the work alongwith certain other employees and further the petitioner had informed that he is no longer interested to work with the 1st Respondent . Even after the letter dated 20-11-2004 calling upon the petitioner to report for work, the petitioner failed to come for work . The 2nd Respondent has not terminated the services of the petitioner, it is the petitioner who has stayed away from work. The 2nd Respondent came to know thatthe petitioner has taken better employment and he is gainfully employed and that is why he has not reported for duty. Since he was not terminated , the allegation of the violation of Section-25G and H of the IDAct does not arise . The allegation of violation ofSection 25- F is also without any substance . Hence for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs.
का. आ. 2124.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनाईटेड बैंक ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, कोलकाता के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 31/1985 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12025/3 / 2008- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 9th July, 2008
S.O. 2124. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 31/1985 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Kolkata as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of United Bank of India and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 7-7-2008 .
[No. L - 12025/3/ 2008 - IR ( B - II ) ] RAJINDER KUMAR , Desk Officer 6.When the matter was pending before this Tribunal for adjudication , both sides have filed a joint memo of agreement wherein they have stated during the pendency ofthe dispute, the parties had direct negotiations and have arrived at a settlement to the effect that the 2nd Respondent will pay to the petitioner a sum of Rs . 22,500 for full and final settlement of all his claim against both the Respondents including the claim of Gratuity, earned wages, etc. and the petitioner have no claim either against the 1st or the 2nd Respondent on receipt of the amount and further they prayed an award may be passed in terms of this joint memo . The petitioner was present and the Respondent were represented by their Advocates , both parties have signed in the joint memo and the petitioner has admitted that he has received the cheque for the payment of money and an award may be passed in terms ofthejoint memo . The joint memo was recorded .
Point for determination is :
To what relief is the petitioner entitled ?
ANNEXURE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKΑΤΑ Misc . Application No. 04 of 2007 U/s 33A of the I.D. Act , 1947
(Arising out of Reference No. 31 of 1985)
PARTIES
7. As I have already stated that both sides have entered into an agreement and joint memo was filed before this Tribunal and it is also admitted by the petitioner that an award may be passed in terms ofjoint memo and the petitioner has also stated that he has received the cheque for the amount mentioned in the joint memo and he has no grievance against both the Respondents. I find the compromise is for the benefit of the petitioner. As such , an award is to be passed in terms ofjoint memo . The joint memo forms part of the record.
Siddhartha Chakraborty , C/o Cachar Regional Office, United Bank of India , Central Road, Silchar - 788001 ...Applicant Versus [भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
4305
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
ANNEXURE
United Bank of India,
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT 11 , Hemanta Basu Sarani , Kolkata- 700 001
...Opp. Party
PRESENT :
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT , ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
Mr. Justice C.P. Mishra, Presiding Officer
APPEARANCE :
Shri P. L. Norbert, B.A. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer
(Tuesday, the 22nd day of January 2008 )
:None
Onbehalf of the Applicant
I.D. 52 of 2006
: None
On behalf of the Opp. Party
(I.D. 2/96 of Labour Court , Kozhikode) Dated : 24-6-2008 .
Industry : Banking.
Workman/Union
AWARD
Smt . P. K. Kalyani C/ o The General Secretary, Southern Railway Labour Union , Edapally North P.Ο. , Kochi - 682024 .
Management
This is an application filed by one Shri Siddhartha Chakraborty under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 alleging violation of Section 33 of the said Act during pendency of Reference No. 31 of 1985 .
: The Divisional Personnel Officer , Southern Railway, Palakkad.
This case coming up for hearing on 22-1-2008 , this Tribunal -cum - Labour Court on the same day passed the following:
AWARD
When the case is called out today, none appears for either side. It appears from the record that the Applicant has never appeared before this Tribunal to pursue his case. A letter was however received from the Applicant in the office on 26-3-2008 stating that he wants to withdraw the present application and he has accordingly prayed for appropriate order in this regard.
In the circumstance , the present application under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is dismissed for non-prosecution .
Dated: 24th June, 2008 , Kolkata,
C. M. MISHRA , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 11 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2125.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार साउदर्न रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, एर्नाकुलम के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 52/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -41012/27/1995- आई आर ( बी- I ) ] एन. एस. बोरा, आर्थिक अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 11th July, 2008
This is a reference made under Section 10 ( 1) ( d) of I.D. Act . The matter was pending before Industrial Tribunal, Kozhikode originally . Against an interim order in M.P. 14/99 the worker went up to High Court by filing Ο.Ρ. 10864/2000 . The proceedings before Industrial Tribunal , Kozhikode was stayed . Meanwhile the Hon'ble High Court in another writ petition ordered to transfer all central government references to CGIT- cum- Labour Court, Ernakulam . Thus the file was transferred to this Court by Industrial Tribunal , Kozhikode . Notices were issued to both sides . The worker was reported to be dead as per postal endorsement of 24-6-2006 . The management also did not appear. While so the O.P.was disposed of by Hon'ble High Court on 6-11-2007 with a direction to proceed and dispose of the reference within two months from the date of receipt of the judgment in O.P. After receipt of the judgment notice was issued to the lawyer who appeared for the worker in the High Court as well as to the management. But none have appeared . None of the legal heirs , if any of the worker also has come forwardto continue the proceedings . The reference is of 1996. Since none is interested in the matter it has to be presumed that there is no subsisting dispute for adjudication .
In the result, an award is passed finding that the action of the management in terminating the service of Smt . P.K. Kalyani w.e.f. 31-12-1993 on the ground superannuation is legal and justified and the worker is not entitled for any relief .
Typed, corrected and passed by me on this the 22nd day of January, 2008 .
S.O. 2125. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 52/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ernakulam , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Southern Railway, and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 11-7-2008 .
P. L. NORBERT, Presiding Officer
Appendix: Nil.
[No. L-41012/ 27/ 1995 - IR (B - I) ] N. S. BORA , Economic Officer 4306
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
The point runs as hereunder :
नई दिल्ली, 11 जुलाई, 2008
"Whether the action of the management of Executive Engineer " U" Division , CPWD , R. K. Puram, New Delhi by not regularizing/ confirming the services of S/ Sh . Kali Charan (Welder) , Ramesh Chand (mate) and Siya Ram (Beldar ) w.e.f. 16-8-1988 and not paying them Equal Pay for Equal Work is fair, just and legal ? If not, to what relief the workmen concerned are entitled to ? " का. आ. 2126.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सी. पी. डब्ल्यू. डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 134/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-42011/37/97- आई आर ( डी यू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 11th July , 2008
The case of the workmen is that Sh . Kali Charan has been working as Welder and Sh . Ramesh Chand as Mate since 16-8-1988 . Sh . Kali Charan is performing duties of Beldar of skilled nature and Sh . Ramesh Chand as Mate, skilled supervisor , Sh . Kali Charan has been getting his skilled wages fixed in Minimum Wages Act, 1948 but regular welder were getting more wages .
That the work of Mate is to supervise the work of maintenance order in Civil Site in the time scale of Rs . 950-1500 but Sh . Ramesh Chand is only getting minimum wages fixed for skilled workmen .
S.O. 2126. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 134/98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of C.P.W.D. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 11-7-2008 .
[No. L -42011 /37/ 97 - IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer
That the Jr. Engineer has been marking the attendance and the same has been countersigned by the SDO. The workmen have been discharging their duties regularly and in view of the Surender Singh's case they are entitled to initial wages of regular workmen.
ANNEXURE
The case of the management is that Sh . Kali Charan and Sh . Ramesh Chand were given work on work order in their name for specific work as per the terms of work orders.
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT , NEW DELHI
Monday, the 24th March , 2008
PRESENT :
R. N. Rai , Presiding Officer
ID . No. 134/1998
In the matter of :
They are contractors and are not workers for the department. These workers were engaged on monthly basis to keep watch on the presence which was necessary to mark their attendance daily . They have been given payment under the Minimum Wages Act . They are contractors and not casual labours . They have been working on the basis of being a contractor and not being workmen.
Shri Kali Charan & Ors . , C/ o CPWD Mazdoor Union , E- 26 ( Old Qtr . ) , Raja Bazar , Baba Kharag Singh Marg ,
New Delhi
Claimant
The workmen applicants have filed rejoinder. In the rejoinder they have reiterated the averments of their claim statement and have denied most of the paras of the written statement . The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement.
Versus
Evidence of both the parties has been taken .
The Executive Engineer ,
Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.
From perusal of the pleadings of the parties the following issues arise for adjudication :
CPWD , U -Division , 2nd Floor , East Block- 2 , CGO Complex , Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110003
Respondents
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its Letter No. L-42011 / 37/97 - IR (DU ) Central Government dt . 28-5-1998 has referred the following for adjudication :-
1. Whether the workmen applicants have completed 240 days work during the tenure of their employment and whether there is employer and employee relationship between the management and the workman ?
[ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
4307 भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
2. Whether the claimants are workmen in view of section.2(s) of the ID Act, 1947 ?
management witness has not denied that three workers named above on work order basis have not been regularized.
3. Whether the claimants are entitled to reinstatement/ regularization ?
4. Whether the workmen applicants are entitled to get Equal Pay for Equal Work ?
Issue No. 1 :
The workman has specifically stated in his cross- examination that he was provided work by the JE and Clerk and he was appointed by the SDO , Sh . Vijay Pal Singh . He was used to be paid through cheque as well as in cash by the SDO .
From perusal of the documents it is proved that the workman has worked under the control and supervision of the JE and he has been made payment directly by the management .
Itwas submitted from the side of the workmen that they were engaged by the management on 16-8-1988 . They are not being paid equal pay for equal work . They have been performing duties under the control of the management. Payment to them is made directly by the management .
It is settled law that even the contractual workers engaged through contractors for perennial nature of work , becomes the employees of the Principal Employer . In case contract is sham and ruse and in case it is found that a workman is working under control and supervision of the management and his services are integrated to the management and payment to him is being made by the management.
It was further submitted from the side of the workmen that the workmen were engaged on 16-8-1988 on work order basis . They have been regularly working since then. Payment to them was made on the basis of minimum wages by the management. Duty to the workman was assigned by the Jr. Engineer. The workman Sh . Siya Ram is deceases . Smt . Sumitra Devi along with her two children has filed application for being impleaded as legal heir of Sh . Siya Ram . Sh. Kali Charan has still been performing the duties of Welder of skilled nature . Sh . Ramesh Chand is also skilled supervisor . Sh . Siya Ram was unskilled workman. He is deceased at present .
That the workmen were paid minimum wage whereas they should have been paid equal wages of the regularworkman. The Jr. Engineer has been marking their attendance and made payment them.
It has been held in ( 1992 ) 4 SCC 118 . "Regularization-Ad hoc/Temporary govt . employees- Principles laid down-Those eligible and qualified and continuing in service satisfactory for long period have a right to be considered for regularization- Long continuance in service gives rise to a presumption about need for a regular post-But mere continuance for one year or so does not in every case raise such a presumption-Govt . should consider feasibility of regularization having regard to the particular . circumstances with a positive approach and an empathy for the concerned person ."
It was submitted from the side of the management that all these workmen worked on work order basis. Their work is mentioned in their contract . They are paid minimum per month . There is no relation of employer and employee . The workmen are contractors . They have beenworking under contractor . They are only contractors of the department.
The management witness has admitted that except Late Sh . Siya Ram two workmen are still working on work order basis . Late Sh. Siya Ram has expired. This witness has further admitted that the workmen have been paid month wise directly by the management of CPWD as per the provision . This witness has also stated that I cannot say that Sh . Raju , S/ o Sh. Panna Lal was working on order basis as Sewerman and his services were regularized as per the office order dated 14-1-2008 .
He has made the same statement regarding Dev Karan Sumbhari . This witness has not denied that the workmen working on work order basis have not been regularized.
Ithas been held in 1997 AIR SCW Page 430 that the industrial adjudicator should decide whether there is valid contract or it is a mere ruse/camouflage and if it is found that the contractor is only a name lender the management should be directed to regularize the workman . In JT 2003 ( 1 ) SC 465-the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that industrial adjudication is appropriate remedy for the alleged contract workers . In (2000 ) I SCC 126-the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that there are multiple pragmatic approach/ factors which should be considered in deciding employer and employee relationship. According to the criteria there should be control and integration . The management has doubtless control over the alleged contractor's men as they work in the establishment of the management . They are integrated to the service of the management . There are no terms and conditions of the contract so there is master and servant relationship . The creation of contract labour is only sham and camouflage and the employer cannot be relieved of hisliabilities .
The management has not denied that the workmen are not still working on work order - basis . The [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4308
In Pollock Law of Torts a servant and an independent contractor has been defined as under:
The distinction between a servant and an independent contractor has been the subject matter ofa large volume of case- law from which the text- book writers on torts have attempted to lay down some general tests . For example, in Pollock's Law ofTorts , (Pages 62 and 63 of Pollock on Torts , 15th Edn. ) the distinction has thus been brought out :
indifferent perfect paper arrangement , that the real employer is the management , not the immediate contractor. Myriad devices , half- hidden in fold after fold of legal form depending on the degree of concealment needed, the type of industry, the local conditions and the like may be resorted to when labour legislation casts welfare obligations on the real employer, based on Articles 38 , 39, 42 , 43 and 43 -A of the Constitution . The Court must be astute to avoid the mischief and achieve the purpose of the law and not be misled by the maya of legal appearances ."
This case law has been affirmed by the Constitution Bench Judgment in Steel Authority of India . In case the security job chokes off, the workmen would be laid off. Such contract is prohibited; it is not a contract for a given result.
My attention was drawn to another Constitution Bench Judgment-Steel Authority of India . It has been held as under :
"A master is one who not only prescribes to the workman the end of his work, but directs or at any moment may direct the means also , or, as it has been put, retains the power of controlling the work, a servant is a person subject to the command of his master as to the manner in which he shall do his work.......... An independent contractor is one who undertakes to produce a given result but so that in the actual execution of the work is not under the order or control of the person for whom he does it, and may use his own discretion in things not specified beforehand
In Salmond's Treatise on the Law of Torts the distinction between a servant and independent contractor has been indicated as under:
"Where a workman is hired in or in connection with the work of an establishment by the principal employer through a contractor, he merely acts as an agent so there will be master and servant relationship between the principal employer and the workmen . But where a workman is hired in or in connection with the work of an establishment by a contractor , either because he has undertaken to produce a given result for the establishment or because he supplies workmen for any work of the establishment , a question mig IOC arise whether the contract is a mere camouflage as in Hussainabhai Calicult's case (supra ) and an Indian Petrochemicals Corporation's case ( supra ) etc; if the answer is in the affirmative , the workmen will be in fact an employee ofthe principal employer, but if the answer is in the negative , the workmen will be a contract labourer. "
"What then, is the test of this distinction between a servant and an independent contractor ? The test is the existence of a right of control over the agent in respect of the manner in which his work is to be done. A servant is an agent who works under the supervision and direction of his employer ; an independent contractor is one who is his own master . Aservant is a person engaged to obey his employer's orders from time to time ; an independent contractor is a person engaged to do certain work, but to exercise his own discretion as to the mode and time of doing it -he is bound by his contract , but not by his employer's orders . "
Inthe instant case the workmen have not been hired in connection with the work of a contractor but they have been hired by the contractor for the work of the respondents . So in the instant case there is contract of service between the principal employer and the workmen .
The Constitution Bench Judgment of Steel Authority ofIndia is squarely applicable in the instant case . In JT 2001 (7) SC 268 it has been held that " 121 (5) On issuance of prohibition notification under Section 10 ( 1 ) of the CLRA Act prohibiting employment of Contract Labour orotherwise , in an industrial dispute brought IOC before itby any contract labour in regard to conditions of service, the industrial adjudicator will have to consider the question whether the contractor has been interposed either on the ground ofhaving undertaken to produce any given result for the establishment or for supply of contract labour for The test regarding independent contractor and intermediaries have been laid down in Hussainabhai , Calicut v. the Alath Factory Thezhilali Union Kozhikode {AIR 1978 SC 1410 (3 Judges) } " the true test may , with brevity, be indicated once again . Where a worker or group ofworkers / labours to produce goods or services and these goods or services are for the business of another , that other is , in fact, the employer . He has economic control over the workers subsistence , skill , and continued employment . Ifhe , for any reason , chokes off, the worker is , virtually , laid off. The presence of intermediate contractors with whom the workers have immediate or direct relationship as contract is of no consequence when , on lifting the veil or looking at the conspectus of factors governing employment, we discern the naked truth , though draped 4309 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भांग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
working on work order basis from 16-8-1988 and Sh. Ramesh Chand alsofrom 16-6-1988 . They have completed 10 years on 15-6-1988 . Siya Ram was also working from 16-6-1988 but now he is deceased.
This issue is decided accordingly .
Issue No. 2 :
work of the establishment under a genuine contract or is a mere ruse/camouflage to evade compliance with various beneficial legislations so as to deprive the workers of the benefit thereunder . If the contract is found to be not genuine but a mere camouflage, the so - called contract labour will have to be treated as employees of the principal employer who shall be directed to regularize the services ofthe contract labour in the establishment concerned ."
Itwas submitted from the side of the management that the workmen are independent contractors .
It has been held in this case that whether there is prohibition of contract labour or otherwise the industrial adjudicator will have to consider the question and in case the contract appears ruse and camouflage to evade compliance with various beneficial legislation the so called contract labour will have to be treated as the employee of the principal employer and he shall be directed to regularize the services of the contract workers .
Engagement of contract workers for perennial and regular nature of job is prohibited . The security function is a perennial nature of job . So long as the respondents exists there would be need of security for them , so the work is of existing, continuous and perennial in nature for such work contract workers cannot be employed.
My attention was drawn to the judgment of Hon'ble Delhi High Court WP(C) No. 7032 of 2005. The Hon'ble Court has placed the reliance on order 20-3-1993 . The workmen worked under the direction of the Engineer Incharge. In the above circular the management directed the authorities of CPWD to send the list of such daily ratedmuster roll workers engaged on hand receipt or work order or any other basis defining the existing government instructions ensuring inter alia termination of services of all such workers who have not completed 240 days services in two consecutive years . The probable demand requiring appointment of such workers may also be intimated to thisDirectorate . As such in the circular of 1993 a complete banwas imposed on engagement of workmen on work order or hand receipt and it was also directed that the list ofthose workers who have completed 240 days of services should also be intimated to the directorate . The Hon'ble High Court held that the workers engaged on work order basis shall also be daily rated workers and provisions of Section 25-F of the ID Act , 1947 wouldbe attracted.
The claimant in this case is workman in view of section 2( s) of the ID Act, 1947 .
This issue is decided accordingly .
According to well reorganization definition of contract it is an agreement for a given result . The result should be visible . Contract labourers can be engaged for the work of contractor only and not for the work of any establishment . In the present case the work is of the establishment and not of the contractor . The term supply of labour by a contractor is against human dignity. No one can be a supplier of human labour to any establishment . It is duty of State to give employment to citizen and not of the contractors .
Issue No. 3 :
Contractors cannot supply labour to any establishment .
It isadmitted by the management that the workman was engaged on 4-1-1991 and he has worked continuously up to 2004. During the pendency of the reference the management illegally removed the workman in 2004 violating section 33 of the ID Act, 1947 .
It has been held in Uma Devi's case by the Hon'ble Supreme Courtthat if a workman has worked for 10 years without orders of Court and against sanctioned post, the management should consider the feasibility of regularization. Sh . Kali Charan and Ramesh Chand have been working under the management from 16-6-1988 . The management has not considered their case of regularization for 20 years . The workman Sh . Kali Charan and Sh. Ramesh Chand are entitled to regularization within two months from the publication of the award. Smt. Sumitra Devi , S /o Late Sh. Siya Ram is entitled to compensation of Rs . 1 Lakh as the deceased workman has rendered services for long years . Had he been alive he would have also been regularized .
This issue is decided accordingly .
Issue No. 4 :
Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that in view of 1966 LLJ 134 , AIR 1991 page 173 and in view The management witness has admitted that by Circular letter dated 18-8-1993 the engagement on work order basis, hand receipt basis and contract basis was prohibited by the government. The workmen have worked under the control and supervision of the management . MW1 has not denied the continuous working of the workmen from 16-6-1988 to till date . The workmen are not an independent contractor . They worked as per direction of the management authorities , so there is employer and employee between the management and the workmen and the workmen have completed 240 days in every year oftheir employment. Sh. Kali Charan has been
2745 GI/08-33 4310
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930
ofDirective Principles of State Policy has confirmed in Article 30(d) of the Constitution a casual workman cannot be denied the same salary of Class - IV employees when they performed the same duties on regular basis . There should be equal pay for equal work and it should be treated as a fundamental right in service jurisprudence .
It has been held in ( 2003 ) 6 SCC 123 as under :-
The principle of " equal pay for equal work " is not always easy to apply. There are inherent difficulties in comparing and evaluating the work done by different persons in different organizations , or even in the same organization . It is a concept which requires for its applicability complete and wholesale identity between a group of employees claiming identical pay scales and the other group of employees who have already earned such pay scales . The problem about equal pay cannot always be translated into a mathematical formula .
Itis obvious from the judgment that the principles ofequal pay for equal work cannot be applied everywhere . A daily wager holds no post . Scale of pay is attached to a definite post. This workman was not holding any definite post, so he cannot be compared with the regular and permanent staff for equal pay and allowances .
li nasc
held in (2003) I SCC 250 as under:
"Equal pay for equal work-applicability of the depends not only on the nature pra or volume but also on the qualitative difference in reliability and responsibilities as well .
---Even in case of same functions , responsibilities do make a real and substantial difference- It is for the claimant of parity to substantiate a clear cut ba f equivalence and a resultant hostile discr. ination-In absence of requisite substantiating material , High Court erred in granting the NMR workers/daily wagers /casual workers parity in pay with the regularly employed staffmerely on presumption of equality of the nature ofwork-However, such workers , held , entitled to payment of prescribed minimum wages . "" Ithas been held in this case that equal pay for equal workwould depend upon not only the nature or the volume of work but also on the qualitative difference as regards reliability and responsibilities though the functions may be the same .
The workman was engaged on work order basis . He was not a regular employee , so he is not entitled to Equal Pay for Equal Work.
The reference is replied thus :
The action of the management of Executive Engineer "U " Division, CPWD, R. K. Puram , New Delhi
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] by not regularizing/confirming the services of S/ Sh . Kali Charan (Welder) , Ramesh Chand (Mate) w.e.f. 16-8-1988 is neither just nor fair . They are not entitled to get Equal Pay for Equal Work . The management should regularize the services of Sh. Kali Charan and Sh . Ramesh Chand within two months from the date of the publication ofthe award. The management should pay a sum of Rs . 1,00,000 (Rs . One Lakh ) as compensation to Smt . Sumitra Devi , W/ o of deceased workman Sh . Siya Ram.
The award is given accordingly .
Date : 30-6-2008
R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 11 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2127.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दिल्ली मिल्क स्कीम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 34/98) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-42012/146/89- आई आर ( डी.यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 11th July , 2008
S.O. 2127.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 34/98 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. II , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Delhi Milk Scheme and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 11-7-2008 .
[No. L- 42012/146/ 89 - IR ( D.U. ) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
PRESENT :
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer I.D. No. 34/1998
IN THE MATTER OF :
Shri Madan Lal ,
S/ o Sh . Sonu Ram , 8Mall Road,
-Claimant Delhi Cantt. - 110010
Versus 4311 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
The General Manager ,
Delhi Milk Scheme ,
inquiry . He was not involved in the pilferage of milk. He was outside at the time of pilferage of the milk .
West Patel Nagar ,
New Delhi
-Respondents
AWARD
Itwas submitted from the side of the management that the workman in the first representation denied his involvement but in the later representation he confessed his guilt so he was taken off duty on his confession .
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L - 42012/ 146/89 - IR( DU) Central Government dt. 31-12-1997 has referred the following point for adjudication :
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action of the management of Delhi Milk Scheme , West Patel Nagar , New Delhi in terminating the services of Sh . Madan Lal is legal " and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to ? "
The workman has admitted in his cross - examination that it is correct that in bottle of milk placed by him 9 bottles were found in excess on 9-4-1982 . He has admitted that he asked for pardon vide letter dated 3-5-1983 , copy of which is marked M - 2 . He has further admitted in his cross - examination that he has written confessional letter on assurances of 3-4 officers but he has again stated that he does not know the name of the officers . The original confession letter of the workman is on record in which he has prayed that in view ofhis poverty he should be exenorated from his guilt .
The case of the workman is that he was appointed as daily paid worker on 21-05-1971 and has been performing his duties regularly and punctually. Vide order dated 6-4-1983 the services of the workman were terminated without assigning any reason which is absolutely illegal and against the labour laws .
The workman has concealed the material facts even in his claim statement; he has written nothing regarding his involvement whether rightly or falsely in his claim statement . Concealment of this fact disentitles the workman from any relief .
That the workman was not afforded opportunity to explainhis conduct . No opportunity was afforded to the workman prior to termination of his services .
He has confessed his guilt in categorical terms , the original ofwhich has been filed by the management .He has also admitted in his cross - examination that he wrote that confessional letter. He could not tell the name of the officers who persuaded him to confess his guilt, so the story of assurances being given by the officers that in case he confessed his guilt he may be pardoned is belied by the fact that he could not tell the names of the officers .
The case of the management is that the workman was issued show cause notice vide order dated 16-8-1982 to show cause as to why his name should not be taken off duty due to his involvement in the case of pilferage of 9.5 filledmilk bottle when deployed on milk distribution duty on 9-4-1982 .
The workman is not entitled to any relief in view of his categorical admission in writing as well as his admission ofhis confessional letter written by him in his oral evidence .
The reference is replied thus :-
That the workman submitted representation in which he expressed his non -involvement in the case as he has stated to have gone to the bathroom at the time of loading of the milk which is far from truth .
The action of the management of Delhi Milk Scheme , West Patel Nagar , New Delhi in terminating the services of Sh. Madan Lal is legal and justified. The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.
That he submitted his another representation on 3-5-1983 in which he has confessed his guilt of his involvement in the pilferage of 9.5 filled bottle milk on the day of incident so he was taken off duty in view of his confession .
The award is given accordingly.
Date : 27-6-2008
R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer Thatany employee whose integrity is doubtful can be taken off from duty by the competent authority .
नई दिल्ली, 11 जुलाई , 2008
का. आ. 2128.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 The workman applicant has filed rejoinder . In the rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement . The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement .
Evidence of both the parties has been taken.
का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डाक विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 99/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.
[सं. एल-40012/56/97 - आई आर (डी.यू. ) ]
सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that his services were terminated without holding proper [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4312
New Delhi, the 11th July, 2008
appointment of Stamp Vendor on compassionate grounds . No objection was raised at the time ofher joining regarding her educational qualification and birth certificate. The workman worked for more than 2 years but thereafter the workman was discharged without any rhyme and reason and without any show cause notice . No inquiry was held prior to termination of the services of the workman.
S.O. 2128. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 99/98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. II , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department ofPost and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 11-7-2008 .
[No. L-40012/56/97 - IR (D.U. ) ]
SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer
The case of the management is that the workman was appointed on compassionate grounds under PNB Delhi Circle on 26-12-1979 and she was deployed as Stamp Vendor . It was clearly mentioned in the appointment letter that her appointment is purely on temporary basis and can be terminated under CCS Rules .
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
That the workman submitted educational qualification certificate of 8th pass at the time of her appointment as admitted by the applicant herself. The certificate was issued on 27-2-1979 signed by Sh . S.P. Sharma on 27-2-1979 as Principal of Janta Vidhyapith Junior High School, Nayla Padam , Aligarh.
PRESENT :
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 99/1998
IN THE MATTER OF :
Onverification of the certificate it was found that the School was wound up in 1974 itself. Sh . Hukum Chand Sharma , Hd . Clerk whose signature appearing on the certificate was not made by him . The said official was givenpunishment of removal from service as a result of Rule 14 proceedings adopting the laid down procedure .
-Claimant
Smt . Shanta Sharma , E-58 , Gali No. 30 , Camp Budhari , Delhi.
Versus
The Secretary , M/o of Communication , Union of India , New Delhi .
The Post Master General ; New Delhi
-Respondents
The Post Master ( G ) , Ramesh Nagar Head Office , New Delhi
AWARD
That it was simultaneously ordered that though the penalty already imposed on her may be maintained . She may be re- employed as a fresh recruit against the normal rule of recruitment subject to her being found medically fit. She was asked to get her medically examined and she was directed to submit attestation form and to submit proof of date of birth and educational qualification certificate . She was addressed by letter dated 2-5-1988 and 17-6-1988 . That she was given 7 days time mentioning clearly that in the event no reply is received itwill be presumed that she was not interested in this job and the case will be treated as closed vide order dated 25-8-1988 . Instead of submitting proof of her educational qualification and date of birth the workman moved application before the Labour Commissioner , Curzon Road, New Delhi .
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L - 40012/ 56/97 - IR ( DU) Central Government Dt . 1 / 16-4-1998 has referred the following point for adjudication:
The point runs as hereunder :--
The workman applicant has filed rejoinder . In the rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement. The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement .
Evidence of both the parties has been taken .
Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.
"Whether the action of the management of Deptt . of Post in terminating the services of Smt . Shanta Sharma, Stamp Vendor at Ramesh Nagar Post Office is just , fair and legal ? If not , what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ? "
Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that the management at the time of her initial termination did The case of the workman is that her husband was declared completely invalid and she was given 4313
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खंड 3 (ii ) ]
not held proper inquiry and her services were terminated on the report of the Hd. Clerk of the said School .
educational qualification and date of birth and she did not submit any certificate and she has raised this dispute after a gap of 10 years .
Herservices were terminated admittedly in the year 1983. She was offered reinstatement in 1988 but she did not approach the management along with certificate of educational qualification and date of birth .
Itwas submitted from the side of the management that the original certificates and the original report ofthe Hd . Clerk has been filed on the record. Despite maintaining the punishment imposed on her for filing forged certificate she was again ordered to be re - employed in case she submits certificate regarding educational qualification and date of birth but she did not submit certificate ofher educational qualification and date ofbirth and she raised a case before the Labour Commissioner.
She has concealed these material facts in her claim statement . She has admitted the forged certificate filed by her. There is no other certificate regarding her educational qualification and date of birth even till date except the forged one filed at the time of her initial engagement . The management rightly terminated her services and did not give her re - employment as she could not submit certificate regarding her educational certificate and date ofbirth .
The workman in her cross - examination admitted that Ex. WW1 /MX was submitted by her . She did not re- collect the year in which she passed the examination of 8th class . She has also denied that the School was not closed in the year 1974 and she has submitted the correct certificate .
The reference is replied thus :-
The action of the management of Deptt. of Post in terminating the services of Smt . Shanta Sharma , Stamp Vendor at Ramesh Nagar Post Office is just fair and legal . The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for .
The award is given accordingly.
Date : 27-6-2008
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 11 जुलाई , 2008 The management has annexed with the record the original educational qualification certificate filed by the workman: She was 8th passed in the year 1961-62 . She has endorsed at the back of the certificate that the certificate was submitted by her at the time of her appointment . She has signed at the back of the certificate dated 3-2-1982 as such the certificate has been admittedly filed by the workman according to the endorsement at the back of it . WW1 /MX 1 contains the report of Hukum Chand Sharma, Hd. Clerk of this School. The Principal has reported on 16-10-1981 that the certificate of Shanta had not been issued by him and he was not the Principal in the year 1979 as the School was closed in 1974 itself.
From perusal of these two documents it becomes quite obvious that the certificate was filed by the workman and during the inquiry it was found that the certificate was forged one . The signature of the Principal was forged. The Hd. Clerk has not also signed the certificate.
का. आ. 2129.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल पोटेटो रिसर्च इंस्टिट्यूट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवादे में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. II , नई दिल्ली क्ले पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 46/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-42011/15/94- आई आर ( डी.यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 11th July, 2008 Itwas the duty of the workman to establish that her certificate was not forged . She could have examined the Principal of the School or Hd. Clerk of the School themselves . Original letters have been filed but she had not examined anyone of them. She could have produced the genuine certificate of her educational qualification and date of birth but she has not filed any other certificate regarding her proof of educational qualification and date ofbirth.
The management was ready for her re- employment after imposing the punishment of termination of her services , she still could not produce the certificate regarding her educational qualification and date of birth before the management .
S.O. 2129.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 46/2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. II, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Potato Research Institute and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 11-7-2008 .
[No. L-42011 / 15/94 - IR (D.U. ) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer It also becomes quite vivid from perusal ofthe record that the management has issued letters three times requesting her to submit certificate regarding her 4314
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVAΝΑ 11 , 1930 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] ANNEXURE
That after research on the development of Potato , the entire potato produced by the Sub - station is sold in the market after obtaining tenders by auction .
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
PRESENT :
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 46/2000
IN THE MATTER OF :
That the said sub - station of the Institute at Patna has been also performing the jobs as weeding , harvesting , sowing , thrashing , hoeing , transplanting , spraying of insecticides , irrigation canal preparation and the workmen connected with this dispute and other staff were also doing these duties . Apart form research work , the maintenance of building operation which includes permanent nature of job such as watch and ward , of ploughing by tractors are also carried out by the workmen concerned with this dispute .
Smt. Nagma Mosmat & Others , Bhartiya Krishi Karamchari
Claimant
Sangh (Regd . ) , C/ o Room No. 95 , Barracks No. 1/10 , Jam Nagar House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi - 110011
That after harvesting of potato , for research work, other crops are also cultivated e.g. Moong , Jute , Maze , Arhar, Rice, and Wheat etc. in the sub - station throughout the year and the services of above workmen are also required throughout the year for the work of research and other incidental work mentioned above .
Versus
That more than 100 students are also visiting the Research Station at Patna for learning of development and research work of potato and other related matters .
The Station- in - charge , Central Potato Research Institute, Post : Sahay Nagar , Patna (Bihar)
Respondents
AWARD
That the workmen connected with this dispute had been performing their duties for the development and research work of the management including all incidental matters in the whole of the year upto 2nd April , 1992 continuously as per the definition of continuous service under Section 25B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L - 42011/ 15/94- IR( DU ) Central Government Dt . 13-4-2000 has referred the following point for adjudication:
The point runs as hereunder :-
That the research work of the station cannot be executed without the cooperation of all the categories of staff including Scientists , Technical , supporting staff etc. and the workman connected with this dispute .
"Whether the action of the management of Central Potato Research Institute , Patna in terminating the services ofSmt . Nagma Mosmat and 88 others w.e.f. 2-4-1992 are justified? If not , to what relief the workmen are entitled ?"
That the management with a view to deny them the státus of permanent workmen had not granted them the status of a regular workman and most the workmen had been performing their duties ranging from 25 to 32 years continuously.
That the management has exploited all the connected workmen as the policy of hire and fire was pursued by the management .
The workmen applicants have filed claim statement. In the claim statement it has been stated that the aim and objects of Central Potato Research Institute is for improvement in varieties , agricultural products , manorial requirements , water needs for high yield and better quality potato and the result obtained form the research to better quality of seed of potato and is passed on to the Central Potato Research Institute is created for the purpose of research and development of Potato in India.
That the headquarters of Central Potato Research Institute is situated in Shimla , H.P. , and regional offices are functioning all over India and one of the research stations is located in Patna .
That the workmen had demaned regularization through their trade union i.e. Bhartiya Krishi Karamchari Sangh vide their letter No. BKKS /Rep /CPRS/ 92 dated 11-3-92 ( copy enclosed and marked as Annexure - I) and granting of equal pay for equal work to these daily rated unskilled workmen working at Central Potato Research Station, Patna and complained that the management arbitrarily and unlawfully regularized some junior 4315
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
workmen were recruited for the last 25 to 32 years back in the regular and permanent job .
workmen without observing seniority and principles of natural justice and most the senior workmen were left out, thenthe management illegally terminated the services ofthe workmenwithout observing provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 w.e.f. 2-4-1992 and their livelihood was santched to teach them the lesson for demanding justice from the management .
That all the workmen performed their duties for more than 25 to 32 years and terminated their services and afterwards engaged women on the same work through contractors and also prisoners from the Central Jail located in the area.
That junior workers were regularized and some were retained in the daily rated for the whole year and denied these workmen connected with the dispute the status of regular workmen .
That the workmen are also covered under the provisions of the Plantation Act , 1951 so the provisions as envisaged in Chapter VB under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1974 are also applicable on the workmen.
That the management has also not taken permission under Section 25 (N) in Chapter VB of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 .
That the management had reduced the workforce arbitrarily , unilaterally and also not given notice under Section 9 -A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 and rules made thereunder .
That about 500 workmen/employees in different categories have been working with the management throughout the year .
That the management has also not paid the compensation , gratuity , one month notice etc. before termination/retrenching the services of the workmen.
That the establishment of the management is covered as defined in Clause ( ii ) of Section 2 of the Payment of Wages Act , 1936 so the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders ) Act is automatically covered under the employment of above management and thereby the workmen became permanent workmen after completion of three months of services in the same category under the establishment of above management .
That the management arbitrarily regularised the services of Shri Harnanda Ram , Doman Das , Dakar Shah , Bhittal Paswan , Joginder , Rambabu and Kusumi Rai in the pay scale of Rs . 750-940, who were recruited in the year 1972-75 and the senior workmen to them from serial No. 1 to were left out without observing seniority and principles of natural justice and most of the senior workmen left out without observing seniority and principles of natural justice and most of the senior workmen left out especially female employees which is also violation of the policy of Government and the management also terminated the services of workmen after receiving demand letter from their union and on earlier occasion also , many Junior persons were regularized in the services .
That the workmen except later Shri Lal Babu Das and late Shri Basant Das appearing at Sl . No. 16 and 48 respectively , all the workmen listed in the Annexure - A attached with the terms of reference are entitled to be reinstated with full back wages , continuity in service and all consequential benefits w.e.f. 2-4-92 .
That the management also retained daily rated workmen Smt . Chinta , Fakira Tanti , Vishnu Rai , Ramasis Rai , Shivanandan Paswan and Parvesh Kumar Yadav from the dated of their engagement i.e. 25-10-75 , 4-11-75 , 24-10-77 , 30-11-77 , 3-11-79 and 1-10-89 respectively.
ThatSection 25 (F) prescribes condition of precedent for retrenchment , Section 25 (G ) prescribes procedure of retrenchment but the management violated the said provisions as the retrenchment compensation was not given to the workmen and also ignored the principle of last come first go so the termination of workmen is illegal as well as unjustified .
Thatthe retrenchment was not based in a good faith but in colourable exercise of the employer's right .
The management has filed written statement. In the written statement it has been stated that the management of Potato Research Institute is not running any industry within the meaning of Section 2 (J) of I.D. Act, 1947 and , as such , the employees employed in that institute cannot raise any Industrial Dispute alleging termination of their services . It is submitted that the Central Potato Reseach Institute Shortly described hereinafter as CPRI is a wing ofthe Agricultural Research Institute of the Government of India is a part and parcel of the Central Government for carrying on various researches in agricultural field in furtherence of its constitutional obligation field in furtherance of its constitutional obligation under Part IV ofthe Constitution of India .
That the action of the management in terminating the services of 89 workmen connected with this dispute has not been done by the abolition of work on which the 4316
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
That the Central Government has established the Indian Agricultural Research Council for discharging its sovereign functions under the Constitution in furtherance of directive principles of state policy for carrying on welfare measures in the form of conducting researches and bringing improvement in the agricultural field for providing food to the lives surviving in India .
That it is submitted that the CPRI was established in the year 1949 at Patna for carrying on research work on Potato and in the year 1957 its administrative wing was shifted to Shimla in Himachal Pradesh leaving the scientific researches to be carried on at Patna . The entire finances for running this Institute are being provided by the Central Government from its budgetary fund through its Agricultural Department .
That the CPRI , Patna , carries on researches in all aspects of Potato farming by undertaking various works which are enumerated as follows .
It conducts researches for developing suitable cultivars possessing fair level of field resistance to late blight , common scale and aphid transmitted virus diseases .
Itconducts researches for developing compatible andprofitable potato based cropping system for the region. It carries on researches for evaluation of usefulnes of true potato seeds (TPS technology ) and develop disease free nucleus and breeders seed of various varieties suitable for plantation at different regions of the country . It is also carried on researches for developing technology for increasing the yield of potato per unit cultivable land . It carries on researches on ecology apidemiology and control offungal diseases of potato . It is also carried on soil fertility nutrient management in potato production.
It carries on researches on ecology apidemiology and control of fungal diseases of potato . It is also carried on soil fertility nutrient management in potato production.
It carries on researches on agronomic practices for production ofseeds and potato under different agroclimatic condition.
Itcarries on studies on transfer of technology , human resource development and communication with reference to potato production .
In view of the various research works undertaken by the CPRI for the welfare of the country as a whole , the duties , the functions , the responsibilities etc. of the Institute can be considered as welfare measures of the State in the course of discharge of its sovereign function of welfare activities as enumerated in part IV of the Constitution of India .
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] That it is submitted that the duties and functions of the CPRI cannot be said to be in furtherance of carrying on any business or trade with the motive of earning profit or the same cannot be said to be undertaking for the purpose ofproduction and manufacture of goods required bythe consumers for their day to day use or production of raw materials required to be used in industries engaged inproduction of consumers goods . Therefore , the Institute cannot raise any industrial dispute over any of their grievances and no reference can be made to an Industrial Tribunal or Labour Court for adjudication of their demands under the provisions of I.D. Act 1947 .
That it is submitted that as the present reference is not arising out of any industrial dispute , the same is liable to be summarily rejected as not maintainable and it is humbly prayed that the issue of maintainability of the present reference may kindly be decided as a preliminary issue .
That without prejudice to the contention raised above, it is submitted that the management is already having permanent employees like scientists and their assistants and helpers on the roll of the Institute paid through Govt. fund and they perform research works phasing the programmes of different kinds at different periods . The permanent staffs of all categories have been fixed and they perform permanent and regular nature of jobs. The employees are selected and recruited as per the employment rules after selection by Selection Committees and after their application being routed through Employment Exchange. There is no vacancy on such permanent and regular post and as soon as any vacancy exists , the same has to be filled up as per the recruitment rules prescribed by the Government and there is no short- cutmethod of appointing persons by way of regularization ofcasual and temporary workers . So however, there is no bar for the temporary workers and casual workers to appear before the Selection Committees according to the procedure laid down for recruitment of employees andto be selected for their employment as permanent employees .
That it is submitted that some of the concerned workmen mentioned in the annexure of the schedule of reference were engaged as temporary/casual/contingent workers as and when required in the course of carrying on various research operations and as soon as their requirements were not there , their engagement used to be discontinued . None of the concerned workman was ever selected by any selection committee as per the employment rules being routed through Employment Exchange and no one was engaged as a permanent worker against any permanent vacant post , and the nature of engagement was seasonal in character. Considering the seasonal nature 4317 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
of agricultural activities , their engagements were purely casual as and when required .
regularization through Trade Union on 11-3-1992 and complained that the management arbitrarily and un- lawfully regularized some junior workmen without observing seniority and principles of natural justice and most of the Sr. workmen were left out . The management illegally terminated the services of the workmen without observing the provisions of ID Act, 1947 w.e.f. 2-4-1992 and their livelihood was snatched to teach them lesson for demanding justice from the management .
The management has reduced the work force arbitrarily and also not given any notice u/s 9 - A of the ID Act , 1947. Jr. workmen S/ Sh . Ganga Ram , Doman Das , Dakar Shah , Bhittal Paswan, Joginder, Rambabu and Smt. Kusum Rai were regularized in the pay scale of Rs . 750-940 who were recruited in the 1972-75 .
Considering the nature of their engagements , they cannot make any grievance over the termination of their services whenever jobs were not available for them. The issue referred to the Hon'ble Tribunal over the termination of their services is absolutely vague , indefinite and is liable to be summarily rejected . As none of the workman had any substantive right to continue in their employment as a regular or permanent candidate, there is no ground for them to make any grievances over their termination of services on any reason whatsoever. One can only raise any grievances over his termination of service if he has right to continue in the employment irrespective of the condition of availability of job or not and who holds permanent post maintaining permanent status but a casual and temporary worker not holding any post of permanent status and not being engaged against any permanent vacancy, cannot agitate his claim challenging his termination of service . Therefore the present reference is not arising out of any existing right or over any justifiable demand but is merely a case of demanding employment through litigation .
The management also retained daily rated workmen Smt . Chinta , Fakira Tanti , Vishnu Rai , Ramashis Rai , Shivanandan Paswan and Parvesh Kumar Yadav from the date of their engagement i.e. 25-10-1975 , 4-11-1975 , 24-10-1977 , 30-11-1977 , 3-11-1979 and 1-10-1989 . The management has not followed the provisions of Section 25F of the ID Act , 1947. The workmen have been terminated without paying retrenchment compensation .
That it is submitted that on the very face of the reference and the nature of duties on which some of the concerned persons were engaged , the reference is liable to be summarily rejected not being any industrial dispute and no right subsisting on the part of the concerned workmen to demand for their regular employment as permanent workers .
Itwas submitted from the side of the management that Potato Research Institute is not running any industry within the meaning of Section 2( J) of I.D. Act, 1947 and , as such , the employees employed in that institute cannot raise any Industrial Dispute alleging termination of their services . It is submitted that the Central Potato Research Institute shortly described hereinafter as CPRI is a wing ofthe Agricultural Research Institute of the Government of India is a part and parcel of the Central Government for carrying on various researches in agricultural field in furtherance of its constitutional obligation field in furtherance of its constitutional obligation under part IV ofthe Constitution of India .
That it is submitted that the management is justified in terminating the services of the employees of the Institute who were temporarily engaged on casual basis on some seasonal nature of jobs connected with agricultural operations and the concerned workmen are not entitled to any relief .
The workman applicant has filed rejoinder. In the rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement. The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement .
It was submitted that the Central Government has established the Indian Agricultural Research Council for discharging its sovereign functions under the Constitution in furtherance of directive principles of state policy for carrying on welfare measures in the form of conducting researches and bringing improvement in the agricultural field for providing food to the lives surviving in India.
Evidence of both the parties has been taken.
Both the parties have filed written brief. Perused the written brief and heard the parties .
It was submitted from the side of the workmen that most of the workmen have been performing their duties ranging from 25-30 years . The management has exploited all the connected workmen as the policy of hire and fire was pursued by the management . The workmen demanded
Itwas further submitted that the CPRI was established in the year 1949 at Patna for carrying on research work on Potato and in the year 1957 its administrative wing was shifted to Shimla in Himachal Pradesh leaving the scientific researches to be carried on at Patna . The entire finances for running this Institute are being provided by the Central Government from its budgetary fund through its Agricultural Department .
2745,G1/08-34 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 4318
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
the employer employee relations .
(d) If the organization is a trade or business it does not cease to be one because of philanthropy animating the undertaking.
Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that the judgment of the Constitution Bench ( 1978 ) 3 SCR 207 still holds the field so far as definition of 2J of ID is concerned . The Hon'ble Apex Court in that judgment has laid down triple tests and in the light of these tests it is to be ascertained whether the respondent/ management is an Industry or not.
Although section 2 (j ) uses words of the widest amplitude in its two limbs , their meaning cannot be magnified to over each itself.
The Hon'ble Apex Court has laid down further the dominant nature test . It has been held as follows :----
Ithas been held in Bangalore Water Supply that in an Industry there should be systematic activity and it should be organized by cooperation between the employer and the employees and it should be for production and/ or distribution of goods and service calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes . It has been held that absence of profit motive or gainful objective is irrelevant . The true focus is functional and the decisive test is the nature of the activity with special emphasis on the employer and employee relations . If an organization is not carrying on trade and business , it is not beyond the purview of Industrial activities .
"Where a complex of activities some of which qualify for exemption , others not involves employees on the total undertaking some of whom are not workmen as in the University of Delhi case or some departments are not productive of goods and services if isolated, even then the predominant nature of the services and the integrated nature of the departments as explained in the Corporation of Nagpur will be the true test . The whole undertaking will be industry although those who are not workmen by definition may not benefit by the status ."
(1978 ) 3 SCR-Bangalore Water Supply case is a Constitution Bench Judgment . It is still holding the field in the matter of adjudication of this point .
Ithas been held in this case that Section 2 (j ) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 which defines industry contains words of wide import as wide as the legislature could have possibly made them . The problem of what limitations could and should be reasonably read in interpreting the wide words used in section 2(j ) is far too policy oriented to be satisfactorily settled by judicial decisions . The Parliament must step in and legislate in a manner which will leave no doubt as to its intention . That alone can afford a satisfactory solution to the question which has agitated and perplexed the judiciary at all levels .
The management witness has admitted that Potato isproduced and it is sold in the local market . Casual Labours are required for that work. The management is engaged in complex activities as such some employees may not be the workman as professionals of an institute . There are systematic activities and there is relation of employer and employee . The Hon'ble Apex Court has held thatthe whole undertaking will be industry although those who are not a workman by definition may not benefit by the status . In view of this judgment casual labours of farm agricultural institute are workmen and the management is an industry for that purpose .
The management witness has stated in his cross- examination as under :-
The management witness has admitted that the list of 88 workmen was filed before the Conciliation Officer. So it is admitted that these workers were engaged by the management . They may have been engaged seasonally but they were casual labours working under the management .
In this judgment the Hon'ble Apex Court has laid down triple test to ascertain whether a particular unit or undertaking is an industry or not. It has been held in this case that where ( i ) systematic activity , ( ii ) organized by cooperation between employer and employee (the direct and substantial element is chimercial ) , ( iii ) for the production and/ or distribution of goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes ( not spiritual or religious , but inclusive of material things or services geared to celestial bliss e.g. making on a large scale prasad orfood).
The management witness has admitted as under :-
(b) Absence of profit motive or gainful objective is irrelevant be the venture in the public , joint, private or other sector,
"It is fact that the affidavit produced by us by admitting correctly the status of the workers . It is fact that Annexure - A showing list of the workers numbering 88 was submitted from the side of the management before the Conciliation Officer . I do (c) The true focus is functional and the decisive test is the nature of the activity with special emphasis on 4319
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
circumstances non - examination of the workmen is not verymuch material and no adverse inference can be drawn as argued by the management .
not know if the Institute after terminating the services of the concerned workmen employed contractors and also entrusted the persons to do temporary nature of work. It is fact that the working in the institute though consists of seasonal and permanent but the workers have been going throughout the year . It is fact that we usually pay to the temporary employees once in a month . It is fact thatthe duty hours of daily rated workers and regular workers are identical. "
This witness has admitted that the work still exists and the work is taken by contractor's men and by jail persons . The management has done gross injustice to these workmen. No seniority list has been produced by the management . The management was duty bound to produce seniority list and maintain muster roll in view of the provisions of ID Act , 1947 .
The workmen are casual labours but they must be doing some sort of work off and on for their survival . It is proved that they have been working with the management for long years and when they raised the case of regularization the management terminated their services but the management filed list of these workmen before the conciliation officer .
From perusal of the cross - examination it becomes quite obvious that the status of the workers have been correctly admitted . It also becomes quite vivid that the list of88 workers was submitted by the management before the conciliation officer . This witness has admitted that seasonal as well as permanent workers worked throughout the year . This witness has stated that he could not say whether the work at present is taken through the contractors or through the jail persons .
It is settled law that the management is bound to adhere the principles of first come last go . The work performed by these workers is being taken from contractor's men and through the jail persons in violation of Section 25F , G & H of the ID Act , 1947. The management violated Section 25F of the ID Act , 1947 also.
From the admission of this witness it becomes quite obvious that these workers worked all the year round. Monthly wages were paid to them . It also becomes quite obvious that the management terminated their services when they raised their case of regularization . These workers were paid monthly wages in view of the admission ofthe management witness . Regular workmen and casual labour were paid monthly.
From the above it becomes quite obvious that these workmen have been working for long years throughout the year and when they demanded regularization these workmen were illegally retrenched and they have been replaced by contractor's men and jail persons .
The management witness has in specific words stated that it is fact that working in the institute though consists of seasonal and permanent but the workers have been going throughout the year . This witness has not anywhere stated that seasonal workers are different and casual workers are different . All the workers worked throughout the year .
The workmen Late Sh. Lal Babu Das and Late Sh . Basant Das appearing at Sl. No. 16 and 48 in the list of the workers submitted by the management are deceased . The management in violation of Section 25 G & H is taking work from contractor's men and through jail persons . This fact has not been denied by the management .
The workmen are casual labours . They must be doing some sort of work off and on so they are entitled to 25% back wages only .
The reference is replied thus :---
In view of the above admission of this witness it is held that the workmen worked throughout the year . The management admits the list of the workmen . The management filed list of 88 workers before the Conciliation Officer . This fact is also admitted to the management, so these 88 workers are workers who have beenworking throughout the year in view of the admission ofMW1 cited above .
The action of the management of Central Potato Research Institute , Patna in terminating the services of Smt . Nagma Mosmat and 86 others w.e.f. 2-4-1992 is not justified. The management should reinstate the workmen along with 25 % back wages within two months from the date of the publication of the award.
The award is given accordingly.
R.N. RAI , Presiding Officer
Date : 25-6-2008
It is correct that the workmen have not examined themselves but no adverse inference can be drawn in view ofthe categorical admission of the management witness though workers consists of seasonal and permanent but the workers have been doing work throughout the year . These workers have been working at that time and they have been working throughout the year . In the 4320
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
AWARD
नई दिल्ली, 11 जुलाई, 2008
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L - 40012/26/ 2005 - IR( DU) dated 11-8-2005 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication .
The schedule mentioned in that order is :
का. आ. 2130.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 75/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
"Whether the action of the Management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. , Vellore in terminating the services of Sri V. Gunalan is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled to ? " [सं. एल-40012/26/ 2005 - आई आर ( डी यू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 11th July , 2008
2. After the receipt of the Industrial Dispute this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 75/2005 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered apprearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statements respectively.
3. The allegations in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows :
S.O. 2130.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 75/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Chennai , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department ofTelecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 11-7-2008 .
[No. L- 40012/26/ 2005 - IR ( DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Monday , the 24th March , 2008
PRESENT :
K. Jayaraman , Presiding Officer
Industrial Dispute No. 75/2005
[ In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d ) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) . of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and their workman] .
BETWEEN
Sri V. Gunalan
: 1st Party/ Petitioner AND
The General Manager
Telecom Vellore SSA
Vellore District
Vellore-632001
: 2nd Party/Respondent
APPEARANCE :
For the Petitioner
: M/ s Sri S. Vaidyanathan, M. Rajendran
For the Management : M/ s P. Arulmudi and P. Srinivasan
The petitioner was employd as a Part - time Delivery Messenger at the Telegraphic Office , Villupuram w.e.f. 8-7-1992. Even though , he would be given work for 6 hours a day, he has worked for more than 6 hours on several days. Thus the petitioner has completed 480 days of continuous service in a period of 24 calendar months and as such he is deemed to have attained the permanent status as per the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act , 1981 . The petitioner has worked 1615.15 hours in 1993 , 1582.14 hours in 1994 and 1753.50 hours in 1995 and 1825.50 hours in 1996 and 1722.50 hours in 1997 , thus , he has worked more than 275 days a year including the holidays and festival days . While so , the petitioner was orally terminated w.e.f. 1-2-1998 without any rhyme or reason. Subsequently , the petitioner was asked to work through the Contractor from 2-2-1998 by stating that the work has been entrusted to the Contractor from 1-1-1998 . Since the work done by the petitioner is of perennial in nature , the petitioner filed an OA in OA No. 346/1998 before the Central Administrative Tribunal ( CAT) , Madras Bench but by an order dated 16-2-2000 , the Administrative Tribunal has dismissed the application . Then the petitioner preferred a Writ Petition in WP No. 5217/2000 in the Division Bench , Madras High Court. Even though the Hon'ble High Court disposing of the writ , the High Court permitted the petitioner to avail alternative remedy in accordance with the law . Though the petitioner joined as Part- time Casual Mazdoor , he was asked to discharge the work of a full time Telegraphic Messenger , therefore , the action of the Respondent Management in terminating the services of the petitioner is violative of principles of natural justice and arbitrary. Since the petitioner had completed 240 days in a continuous period of 12 calendar months and since the Respondent has not complied with Section -25F of the ID Act , the termination is void 4321 [भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
instead of establishing his case has tried to shift the onus on the Respondent. The findings by the Hon'ble High Court is on a question of law and hence the petitioner would not be entitled to any relief claimed by him . It is not correct to say that the petitioner has rendered continuous service . On the other hand, he was engaged as and when required on need basis . Hence , for all these reasons the Respondent Management prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
5. The points for determination are :
(i) Whether the action of the Respondent Management in terminating the services of the concerned employee , Sri V. Gunalan is legal and justified ?
(ii) To what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ?
Point No. 1
ab initio . Even though number of Contractors alleged to have taken the contract , the petitioner was working in the Respondent Management continuously and he was asked to work in different names . The post in which the petitioner was working is a sanctioned post . The work is of perennial in nature , therefore , the action of the Respondent in terminating the services is in violation of Section- 25G and H of the ID Act. The Respondent Management adopted an unfair labour practice and denied employment to the petitioner . The alleged contract or agreement signed by the petitioner cannot overrule the provisions of the ID Act. The action of the Respondent in giving the work to the outsider through tender system and get the work done through the petitioner which the petitioner was originally doing under the Respondent is nothing short of unfair labour practice is sham and nominal . Therefore , the action of the Respondent in not regularizing the services of the petitioner but terminating his services is illegal , arbitrary , mala fide and colourable exercise of power . Hence , for all these reasons , the petitioner prays an award may be passed in his favour for reinstatement with all attendant benefits .
6. In this case , the concerned employee was examind himself as WW1 and marked 17 documents and also examined one Srinivasan , the Treasurer of the Petitioner Union. On the side of the Respondent , one Manoharan , the Divisional Engineer ( Admn. ) in GMT , Vellore was examined as MW1 and through him Ex . M1 to Ex. M12 are marked. The contention of the petitioner is that he was employed as Part - time Delivery Messenger at the Telegraphic Office , Villupuram Division under Ranipet CTO on regular basis and he further contended that even though he was appointed as Part-time Delivery Messenger for 6 hours , he has worked more than 6 hours on several days and thus he has completed 240 days in a continuous period of 12 calendar months and 480 days in a continuous period of 24 calendar months and he further contended as per the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment ofPermanent Status to Workmen) Act , 1981 , he is entitled to the benefits of the Act and deemed to be a regular employee . It is the further contention of the petitioner that the work done by him is perennial in nature and therefore his services is to be regularized in the Respondent Management.
7. As against this , the Respondent contended the concerned employee was not engaged in any permanent or regular work . He was engaged only on contract basis for contingent work for short spells . It is his further contention that the work is not perennial in nature and all along the petitioner was working on need basis in the leave vacancy and after the instructions given by the higher authorities during the year 1998 , all persons like the petitioner were disengaged and the work was assigned on contract basis through tender therefore the engagement of the petitioner on need basis and the petitioner has not worked continuously as alleged by him . Therefore , the burden of proving that the petitioner has worked continuously is upon him . For this , he has filed the copy 4. As against this , the Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged the petitioner was not engaged by the Respondent Management as Part- time Casual Mazdoor butonly on contract basis for contingent work that too for short spells . The petitioner did not perform any regular work as claimed by him nor there was any control exerted by the Respondent over him . As per the orders of the higher-ups all persons like the petitioner were terminated by the Respondent Management and the petitioner was terminated w.e.f. 29-1-1998 . All the work was assigned on contract basis through tender. It cannot be said that the work done by the petitioner is perennial in nature but it is only on need basis . After the termination , the petitioner opted to work with the tenderers . The petitioner's application before the CAT was dismissed on the ground that the action taken by the department is proper. Even before the High Court in the WP, the Hon'ble DivisionBench of the High Court was pleased to dismiss the said WP and therefore the petitioner's claim is not maintainable . In the Respondent Management for the Casual Labout who are engaged on full time basis in the year 1993 , a scheme was framed for grant of temporary status and regularization, since the petitioner was working as Contract Labour , he was excluded from the purview of the scheme . From 1998 , the Respondent Management was not engaging any Casual Labourer and the work had been let out on contract . Therefore , there is no violation of any provisions of law more particularly Section - 25F ofthe ID Act. The Respondent have not engaged any new recruits and there is no violation of Section - 25G or H. The petitioner was engaged only as a Part- time Messenger and there is no regular post as Part-time Messenger , hence the petitioner is not entitled to any relief. The petitioner 4322
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
of the payment of wages from 1993 to 1998 under Ex . W13 and also the payment of DA arrears on wages from 1994 to 1995 under Ex . W14 . The learned counsel for the Petitioner contended from the record produced by the petitioner, it is clear that the petitioner has worked more than 1600 hours and if it is divided by 8 hours a day, the actual working days comes to more than 200-215 days ifthe weekly holidays and national and festival holidays are taken into account , the total number of working days in a year crosses more than 275 days . Therefore , he is entitled to the benefits of the ID Act. He further argued that the Respondent Management without following the mandatory provisions of Section - 25 ( F ) has terminated the services of the petitioner and therefore the termination is void ab initio . As against this , it is the contention of the respondent that the concerned employee cannot be a member of the petitioner union and the petitioner union cannot represent the concerned employee and therefore the dispute raised by the petitioner union is not maintainable . The Respondent Management has also issued several circulars wherein it is clearly stated the non - regular employees cannot be a member of any of the recognized unions and he relied on the circulars dated 24-12-1992 and 25-7-1989 to substantiate his claim which are marked as Exs . M1 and Ex . M3 .
8. But as against this , the petitioner examined the Treasurer of the Petitioner Union who produced the Bye- Laws of the Association and also the resolution passed by the petitioner union to espouse the cause of the concerned employee and others . Further , it is contended on behalf of the petitioner though the concerned employee and other employees were not members of the petitioner union, the case ofthese employees pertaining to regularization under the Respondent Management was raised by the Indian Telecom Employees Union (ITEU) and as per the bye- laws ofthe petitioner union, the petitioner union is entitled to espouse the cause of the employees in general and further the union passed a resolution on 31-10-2001 to espouse the cause of the concerned workman and others and continue to conduct the disputes initially raised by the ITEU. Therefore , this dispute filed by the petitioner union espousing the cause of the concerned employee is maintainable . I find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for Petitioner that the petitioner union is entitled to espouse the cause of the concerned employee. As such , I find this ID is maintainable before this forum .
9. The next thing to be decided in this case is whether the contention of the petitioner for reinstatement is established before this forum . No doubt , the petitioner produced Ex . W13 which are copies of the payment of wages under 80 ( C) -16 where it can be taken into consideration with regard to the fact whether the petitioner has worked more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 months . In this case , admittedly the petitioner has joined as Part -time Casual Labour and the scheme framed
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] by the Respondent Management for regularizing the service of the part - time employees is not applicable to the petitioner . Under such circumstances , it is to be looked into whether the petitioner is establishing the fact that he has worked for more than 240 days in a continuous period of12months preceding his termination to get the benefit underSection- 25 (F) of the ID Act . But, on the other hand the learned counsel for the Respondent contended it is well settled by the Supreme Court and other High Courts "even if a workman has worked for more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 months , he is neither entitled to get regularization or absorption" and therefore the concerned employee is not entitled to any relief in this ID.
10. Further, it is argued on behalf ofthe Respondent that the concerned employee has admittedly filed an application before the CAT in OA 346/1998 in Madras Bench for reinstatement and also for regularization of his service . But , the Tribunal has clearly stated that the concerned employee is not entitled to any relief and dismissed the same. The concerned employee's WPfiled against the order of CAT was also dismissed by the Division Bench of Madras High Court and therefore this petition is not maintainable before this forum .
11. The learned counsel for the Respondent further contended that the case of the concerned employee was one and the same before the CAT and this forum . When the CAT has clearly stated that the petitioner is not entitled to any relief for reinstatement or regularization , the concerned employee cannot approach this forum for the same relief and get a remedy . It is well settled by the Supreme Court in Uma Devi's case "that a temporary employee cannot get an absorption or regularization by claiming that he has worked for more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 months and it also held that an employee with open eye accepts his work is of temporary nature then he cannot seek and claim that he is entitled for regularization or absorption " . In this case , the concerned employee was only appointed as a part - time employee and his job is also not a regular one and he has worked in the Respondent Management on need basis , the work doneby the petitioner cannot be said as perennial in nature , under such circumstances , he is not entitled to claim any reliefmuch less the relief of reinstatement under the Respondent Management .
12. Then again the learned counsel for the Petitioner contended though the concerned employee has approached the CAT for reinstatement and regularization , in this case, he has not asked for relief of regularization and he has only wanted reinstatement in service on the ground that he has worked for more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 months and the action of the termination by the Respondent Management without following the mandatory provisions of Section - 25 (F) is [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
4323
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
Ex. No. Date
Description
Ex.W8 12-11-1993 Letter of appointment
Ex. W9 16-7-1996 Notice regarding regulari- zation of part- time casual mazdoors
Ex.W10 16-9-1999 Conversion ofpart- time casual labours
Ex.W11 22-9-1997 Tender notice
Ex.W12
ab initio void and therefore , the concerned employee is entitled to reinstatement in service with consequential relief. Though , I find much force in this contention that since the concerned employee was entered in the service of the Respondent only as a Part - time Casual Employee and since he cannot claim any relief of reinstatement as alleged by him . Further , no inference can be drawn from the documents produced by the petitioner that he has worked for more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 months , under such circumstances , I am not inclined to accept that the concerned employee is entitled for reinstatement . Therefore , I find this point against the petitioner.
Employment of contract labourers to the telegraph office for the year 1997-98 Point No. 2
Ex.W13
Payment of wages from 1993-1998
The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the concerned employee is entitled ?
Ex.W14
Payment of DA arrears of wages from 1994 & 1995
Ex.W15
Bye-laws of the Union 13. In view ofmy foregoing findings that the action oftheRespondent Management in terminating the services ofthe concerned employee is legal and justified. I find the concerned employee is not entitled to any relief.
Ex . W16 30/31-10-2001 Resolution of the Union 14. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly .
Ex.W17 21-3-2006
(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typedby him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 24th March , 2008) .
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer
Lok Sabha Admitted Provisional Starred Question Dy. No. 10145 for 19-12-2005 by Sri Ganesh Singh regarding regularization of contract workers.
Witnesses Examined :
On the Management's side :
For the I Party/Petitioner : WW1 Sri V. Gunalan
Ex.MI 22-1-1993
WW2 Sri K. Srinivasan
For the II Party /Management : MW1 Sri T. S. Manoharan
Documents Marked :
Copy of eligibility of temporary mazdoors and DRMS for becoming Members/Office bearers of Staff Unions
On the Petitioner's side
Ex . No. Date
Ex.M2 30-3-1985
Description
Ex.W1
Copy of circular regarding casual labour Engagement 6-12-1983 Letter of the G.M. Telecom
Ex.M3 25-7-1989
Ex.W2 7-11-1989
Copy of eligibility of casual . labour tobecome office bearers ofthe Union
Circular of the Telecom regarding regularization of casual labours
Ex.W3
Ex.M4
Copy of preservation period of misc . records issued by the Management
Casual labourers ( grant of temporary status regularization) Scheme
Ex.W4 16-2-2000
Ex.M5
Order of CAT in OA 346 of 1998
Ex.W5 24-4-2000
Copy ofpreservation period of misc . records issud by the Management
Order in WP 5215 to 5218 of 20000
Ex.M6 5-11-2001
Ex.W6
Identity card issued by Asstt . Supervisor i/ c . CTO Ranipet
Ex.W7 8-7-1992 Permission letter to employ petitioner as part - time casual labour
Copy of the letter regarding adoption of the existing appointing/disciplinary / appellate authority contained in P&T Volume III with regard to Group ' C ' & ' D ' staff absorbed in BSNL [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4324
Date
Description
Ex . No.
Ex.M7
Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 11-7-2008.
[No. L -40012/25 / 2005 - IR ( DU ) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
Copy of list of important items to be classified under "Other Contingencies " and list of important articles in common use in P & T Deptt . under Liveries and Uniforms , Operational and Minor Equipment for Post Offices and RMS Offices and Purchase and Repair of Furniture
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
6-8-1991
Ex.M8
Monday, the 24th March , 2008
PRESENT :
K. Jayaraman , Presiding Officer
Industrial Dispute No. 74/2005
of Copy of circular regarding regularization of services of casual workers in Gr . ' D ' posts-Relaxation Employment Exchange procedure and Upper Age Limit
Ex.M9 19-2-2002 Copy ofAgreement of contract period
Ex.M10 25-2-2003
[In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , between the Management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and their workman] .
Between
: 1st Party/Petitioner
Sri J. Thulasi Raman
And
Copy of letter on contract labour ( Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970 and Central Rules , 1971 made thereunder-Grant Certificate of Registration- reg . of
Ex.M11 22-6-1995 Copy of Notification with regarding of Recruitment Rules of Group ' D '
The General Manager Telecom Vellore SSA , Vellore District Vellore- 632001
: 2nd Party/Respondent Ex.M12 3-2-2003
APPEARANCE :
For the Petitioner
Copy of model bills with regard to Security and Maintenance of SSAS
: M/ s Sri S. Vaidyanathan , M. Rajendran
नई दिल्ली, 11 जुलाई, 2008
For the Management : M/s P. Arulmudi & P. Srinivasan
AWARD
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-40012/ 25 /2005 - IR( DU) dated 11-8-2005 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication.
का. आ. 2131 . औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 74/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
The schedule mentioned in that order is:
[सं. एल-40012/25/2005- आई आर ( डी यू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 11th July , 2008
"Whether the action of the Management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. , Vellore in terminating the services of Sri J. Thulasi Raman is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to ?"
2. After the receipt of the Industrial Dispute this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 74/2005 and issued notices toboth sides . Both sides entered apprearance through their S.O. 2131.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central . Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 74/2005 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, Chennai , now as shown in the Annexure, in the [भाग II- खंड 3( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008 / श्रावण 11 , 1930
4325 Advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statements respectively.
petitioner but terminating his services is illegal, arbitrary, malafide and colourable exercise of power . Hence, for all these reasons , the petitioner prays an award may be passed inhis favour for reinstatement with all attendant benefits .
3. The allegations in the Claim Statement are briefly asfollows:
The petitioner was employd as a Part- time Delivery Messenger at the Telegraphic Office, Villupuram from June , 1988 to November , 1989. Even though , he would be given work for 6 hours a day , he has worked for more than 6 hours on several days . Thus , the petitioner has completed 480 days of continuous service in a period of 24 calendar months and as such he is deemed to have attained the permanent status as per the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment ( Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981.
5. As against this , the Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged the petitioner was not engaged by the Respondent Management as Part-time Casual Mazdoor but only on contract basis for contingent work that too for short spells. The petitioner did not perform any regular work as claimed by him nor there was any control exerted by the Respondent over him. As per the orders of the higher-ups all persons like the petitioner were terminated by the Respondent Management and the petitioner was terminated w.e.f. 1-1-1998 . All the work was assignd on contract basis through tender. It cannot be said that the work done by the petitioner is perennial in nature but it is only on need basis . After the termination, the petitioner opted to work with the tenderers . The petitioner's application before the CAT was dismissed on the ground that the action taken by the department is proper. Even before the High Court in the WP, the Hon'ble Division Bench of the High Court was pleased to dismiss the said WP and therefore the petitioner's claim is not maintainable . In the Respondent Management for the Casual Labour who are engaged on full time basis in the year 1993 , a scheme was framed for grant of temporary status and regularization, since the petitioner was working as Contract Labour, he was excluded from the purview of the scheme. From 1998 , the Respondent Management was not engaging any Casual Labourer and the work had been let out on contract . Therefore , there is no violation of any provisions of law more particularly Section - 25F of the ID Act. The Respondent have not engaged any new recruits and there is no violation of Section - 25G or . H. The petitioner was engaged only as a Part-time Messenger and there is no regular post as Part-time Messenger , hence the petitioner is not entitled to any relief. The petitioner instead of establishing his case has tried to shift the onus on the Respondent. The findings by the Hon'ble High Court is on a question of law and hence it would upon the petitioner and therefore the petitioner would not be entitled to any relief claimed by him . It is not correct to say that the petitioner has rendered continuous service . On the other hand , he was engaged as and when required on need basis . Hence , for all these reasons the Respondent Management prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
The points for determination are :
( i) Whether the action of the Respondent Management in terminating the services of the concerned employee , Sri J. Thulasiraman is legal and justified ?
( ii ) To what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ?
4. While so, the petitioner was orally terminated w.e.f. 1-1-1998 without any rhyme or reason . Subsequently , the petitioner was asked to work through the Contractor by stating that the work has been entrusted to the Contractor . Since the work done by the petitioner is of perennial in nature , the petitioner filed an OA in OA No. 347/1998 before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) , Madras Bench but by an order dated 16-2-2000, the Administrative Tribunal has dismissed the application . Then the petitioner preferred a Writ Petition in WP No. 5216/2000 in the Division Bench , Madras High Court . Even though the Hon'ble High Court disposing of the writ , the High Court permitted the petitioner to avail alternative remedy in accordance with the law . Though the petitionerjoined as Part- time Casual Mazdoor, he was asked to discharge the work of a full time Telegraphic Messenger , therefore , the action of the Respondent Management in terminating the services of the petitioner is violative of principles of natural justice and arbitrary. Since the petitioner had completed 240 days in a continuous period of 12 calendar months and since the Respondent has not complied with Section -25F of the ID Act, the termination is void ab initio. Even though number of Contractors alleged to have taken the contract , the petitioner was working in the Respondent Management continuously and he was asked to work in different names. The post in which the petitioner was working is a sanctioned post. The work is of perennial in nature, therefore , the action of the Respondent in terminating the services is in violation of Section - 25G and H of the ID Act . The Respondent Management adopted an unfair labour practice and denied employment to the petitioner . The alleged contract or agreement signed by the petitioner cannot overrule the provisions of the ID Act. The action of the Respondent in giving the work to the outsider through tender system and get the work done through the petitioner which the petitioner was originally doing under the Respondent is nothing short of unfair labour practice is sham and nominal . Therefore , the action of the Respondent in not regularizing the services of the
217561ICE - 35 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4326
Point No. 1
But as against this , the petitioner examined the Treasurer of the Petitioner Union who produced the Bye- Laws of the Association and also the resolution passed by the petitioner union to espouse the cause of the concerned employee and others . Further , it is contended on behalf of the petitioner though the concerned employee and other employees were not members of the petitioner union . the case ofthese employees pertaining to regularization under the Respondent Management was raised by the Indian Telecom Employees Umon ( ITEU ) and as per the bye- laws of the petitioner union , the petitioner union is entitled to espouse the cause of the employees in general and further the union passed a resolution on 31-10-2001 to espouse the cause of the concerned workman and others and continue to conduc the disputes initially raised by the ITEU . Therefo:,this dispute filed by the petitioner union espousing the caure of the concerned employee is maintainable . I find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for Petitioner that the petitioner union is entitled to espouse the cause of the concerned employee . As such, I find this ID is maintamable before this forum.
6. In this case , the concerned employee was examined himself as WW1 and marked 20 documents and also examined one Srinivasan , the Treasurer of the Petitioner Union . On the side of the Respondent , one Manoharan , the Divisional Engineer (Admn . ) in GMT , Vellore was examined as MW1 and through him ĐA MI to i x . M12 are marked . The contention of the petinoner is that he was employed as Part - time Delivery Messger at the Telegraphic Office , Villupuram Division under Ranipet CTO on regular basis and he further contended that even though he was appointed as Part- time Delivery Messenger for 6 hours , he has worked more than 6 hours on several days and thus he has completed 240 days in a continuous period of 12 calendar months and 480 days ir a continuous period of 24 calendar months and he further ontended as per the Tann ! Nadu Industrial Establishment Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen ) Act, 1981, he is entitled to the benefits of the Act and deemed to be a Jalar cmployee. It is the further contention of the Honer that the work done by hum is perenatal in nature merefore his services is tobe regularized in the spondent Management יו
9. The next thing to be decided in this case is whether the contention of the petitioner for reinstatement is established before this forum . No doubt , the petitioner produced Ex. W15 & Ex . W16 which are copies of the payment of wages under 80 ( C ) -16 where it can be taken into consideration with regard to the fact whether the petitioner has worked more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 months . In this case , admittedly the petitioner has joined as Part- time Casual Labour and the scheme framed by the Respondent Management for regularızing the service of the part- time employees is not applicable to the petitioner . Under such circumstances , it is to be looked into whether the petitioner is establishing the fact that he has worked for more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 months preceding his termination to get the benefit under Section - 25 ( F ) of the ID Act. But, on the other hand the learned counsel for the Respondent contended it is well settled by the Supreme Court and other High Courts "even if a workman has worked for more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 months , he is neither entitled to get regularization or absorption " and therefore the concerned employee is not entitled to any relief in this ID.
10. Further, it is argued on behalf of the Respondent that the concerned employee has admittedly filed an application before the CAT in OA 347/1998 in Madras Bench for reinstatement and also for regularization of his service . But, the Tribunal has clearly stated that the concerned employee is not entitled to any relief and dismissed the same . The concerned employee's WP filed against the order of CAT was also dismissed by the Division Bench of Madras High Court and therefore this petition is not maintainable before this forum.
7 As against this , the Respondent contended that the concerned employee was not engaged in any permanent or regular work. He was engaged only on contract basis for contingent work for short spells . It is his further contention that the work is not perennial in nature and all along the petitioner was working on need basis in the leave vacancy and after the instructions given by the higher authorities during the year 1998 all persons like the petitioner were disengaged and the work was assigned on contract basis through tender therefore the engagemem of the petitioner on need basis and the petitioner has not worked ontinuously as alleged by him. Therefore, the burden of proving that the petitioner has worked continuously is upon him. For this , he has filed the copy of the payment of wages at Ranipet from June 1988 to November 1989 under Ex.W15 and also the payment of wages at Vellore from November 1993 to November 1996 under Fx W16 . He further argued that the Respondent Management without following the mandatory provisions of Section - 25 ( F ) has terminated the services of the petitioner and therefore the termination is void ab imtio . As against this , it is the contention of the Respondent that the concerned employee cannot be a member of the petitioner union and the petitioner union cannot represent the concerned employee and therefore the dispute raised by the petitioner union is not maintainable . The Respondent Management has also issued several circulars wherein it is clearly stated the non-regular employees cannot be a member of any ofthe recognized unions and he relied on the circulars dated 24-12-1992 and 25-7-1989 to substantiate his claim which are marked as Ex . Mi and Ex . M3 .
भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii) ]
11. The learned counsel for the Respondent further contended that the case of the concerned employee was one and the same before the CAT and this forum. When the CAT has clearly stated that the petitioner is not entitled to any relief for reinstatement or regularization, the concerned employee cannot approach this forum for the same relief and get a remedy . It is well settled by the Supreme Court in Uma Devi's case " that a temporary employee cannot get an absorption or regularization by claiming that he has worked for more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 months and it also held that an employee with open eye accepts his work is of temporary nature then he cannot seek and claim that he is entitled for regularization or absorption" . In this case , the concerned employee was only appointed as a part- time employee and his job is also not a regular one and he has worked in the Respondent Management on need basis , the work done by the petitioner cannot be said as perennial in nature , under such circumstances , he is not entitled to claim any reliefmuch less the relief of reinstatement under the Respondent Management.
12. Then again the learned counsel for the Petitioner contended though the concerned employee has approached the CAT for reinstatement and regularization , he has not asked for relief of regularization in this ID and he has only wanted reinstatement in service on the ground thathe has worked for more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 months and the action of the termination by the Respondent Management without following the mandatory provisions of Section - 25 ( F) is ab initio void and therefore , the concerned employee is entitled to reinstatement in service with consequential relief. Though , I find much force in this contention that since the concerned employee was entered in the service of the Respondent only as a Part - time Casual Employee and since he cannot claim any relief of reinstatement as alleged by him . Further , no inference can be drawn from the documents produced by the petitioner that he has worked for more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 months , under such circumstances , I am not inclined to accept that the concerned employee is entitled for reinstatement . Therefore , I find this point against the petitioner.
Point No. 2
The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the concerned employee is entitled ?
13. In view of my foregoing findings that the action ofthe Respondent Management in terminating the services of the concerned employee is legal and justified. I find the concerned employee is not entitled to any relief.
14. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly .
(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 24th March , 2008 ).
K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer
4327
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
Witnesses Examined :
WW1 Sri J. Thulasi For the I Party /Petitioner :
Raman
WW2 Sri K. Srinivasan For the II Party/Management : MW1 Sri T. S. Manoharan Documents Marked : On the Petitioner's side
Date
Ex. No.
Description
Ex.W1 6-12-1983 Letter of the G.M. Telecom Ex.W2 7-11-1989 Circular of the Telecom regarding regularization of casual labours
Ex.W3
Casual labourers ( grant of temporary status regularization ) Scheme Ex .W4 16-2-2000 Order of CAT in OA 346 of 1998
Ex.W5 24-4-2000 Order in WP 5215 to 5214 2000
Ex.W6
Identity card issued by Divisional Engineer . Admr Ex.W7
Certificate regarding work at Ranipet
Ex.W8 27-10-1993 Letter of appointment at Vellore
Ex.W9 16-1-1996 Letter referring the increase of work hours from 6 to 8 hrs .
Ex. W10 16-7-1995 Notice regarding regularization of part time casual mazdoors
Ex.W11 20-9-1997 Tender notice
Ex.W12
Employment of contract labourers to the telegraph office for the year 1997-98 Ex .W13 6-1-1998 Representation regarding absorption after termination oral Ex .W14 16-9-1999 Notice regarding conversion of part time casual labours Ex.W15
Payment of wages at Ranipet from June 1988 to November 1989
Ex.W16
Payment of wages at Vellore from November 1993 to November 1996 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008 / SRAVANA 11, 1930
4328
Date
Ex. No.
Description
Ex.W17
Payment of arrears of wages at Vellore January 1995 toMarch 1995
Bye- Laws of the Union Ex.W18
Resolution of the Union 30/31-10-2001
Ex.W19
21-3-2006
Ex .W20
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Date
Ex. No.
Description
6-8-1991
Ex.M8
Copy of circular regarding regularization of services of casual workers in Gr . ' D' posts-Relaxation Employment Exchange of procedure and Upper Age Limit
19-2-2002
Ex.M9
Copy ofAgreement of contract period
Ex.M10 25-2-2003
Lok Sabha Admitted Provisional Starred Question Dy. No. 10145 for 19-12-2005 by Sri Ganesh Singh regarding regularization of contract workers.
On the Management's side :
Date
Description
Ex . No.
22-1-1993
Ex.M1
Copy of eligibility of temporary mazdoors and DRMS for becoming Members/ Office bearers of Staff Unions
30-3-1985
Ex.M2
Copy of circular regarding casual labour engagement 25-7-1989
Ex.M3
Copy of eligibility of casual labour to become office bearers ofthe Union
Ex.M4
Copy ofpreservation period of misc . records issued by the Management
Ex.M5
Copy ofpreservation period of misc . records issued by the Management
5-11-2001
Ex.M6
Copy of the letter regarding adoption of the existing appointing/disciplinary / appellate authority contained in P& T Volume III with regard to Group ' C ' & ' D ' staff absorbed in BSNL Ex.M7
Copy of list of important items to be classified under ' Other Contingencies ' and list of important articles in common use in P & T Deptt . under Liveries and Uniforms , Operational and Minor Equipment for Post Offices and RMS Offices and Purchase and Repair of Furniture
Copy of letter on Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition ) Act , 1970 and Central Rules , 1971 made thereunder-Grant of Certificate of Registration - reg .
22-6-1995
Ex.M11
Copy of Notification with regard to Recruitment Rules of Group 'D'
3-2-2003
Ex.M12
Copy of model bills with regard to Security and Maintenance of SSAS नई दिल्ली, 11 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2132.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 76/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-40012/27/2005 - आई आर ( डी यू) ]
सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 11th July , 2008
S.O. 2132. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 76/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , Chennai , as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department ofTelecom and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 11-7-2008 .
[No. L- 40012/27/2005 - IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI
Monday , the 24th March, 2008
PRESENT :
K. Jayaraman , Presiding Officer [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
4329 Industrial Dispute No. 76/2005
[ In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), between the Management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and their workman] .
BETWEEN
SriK. Bhoopalan
: 1st Party/Petitioner
AND
The General Manager
Telecom Vellore SSA
Vellore District
Vellore-632001
: 2nd Party/Respondent
APPEARANCE :
For the Petitioner
: M/ s Sri S. Vaidyanathan,
M. Rajendran
For the Management : M/ sP. Arulmudi & P. Srinivasan
AWARD
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-40012 / 27 / 2005 - IR( DU) dated 11-8-2005 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is :
"Whether the action of the Management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. , Vellore in terminating the services of Sri K. Bhoopalan is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to ? "
2. After the receipt of the Industrial Dispute this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 76/2005 and issued notices toboth sides . Both sides entered apprearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statements respectively.
3. The allegations in the Claim Statement are briefly asfollows:
year including the holidays and festival days . While so , the petitioner was orally terminated w.e.f. 1-2-1998 without any rhyme or reason . Subsequently , the petitioner was asked to work through the Contractor from 2-2-1998 by stating that the work has been entrusted to the Contractor from 1-1-1998 . Since the work done by the petitioner is of perennial in nature, the petitioner filed an OA in OA No. 345/1998 before the Central Administrative Tribunal ( CAT ) , Madras Bench but by an order dated 16-2-2000, the Administrative Tribunal has dismissed the application . Then the petitioner preferred a Writ Petition inWP No. 5215/2000 in the Division Bench , Madras High Court . Even though the Hon'ble High Court disposing off the writ , the High Court permitted the petitioner to avail alternative remedy in accordance with the law . Though the petitioner joined as Part- time Casual Mazdoor , he was asked to discharge the work of a full time Telegraphic Messenger, therefore , the action of the Respondent Management in terminating the services of the petitioner is violative of principles of natural justice and arbitrary . Since the petitioner had completed 240days in a continuous period of 12 calendar months and since the Respondent has not complied with Section - 25F of the ID Act, the termination is void ab initio . Even though number of Contractors alleged to have taken the contract, the petitioner was working in the Respondent Management continuously and he was asked to work in different names . The post in which the petitioner was working is a sanctioned post . The work is of perennial in nature , therefore , the action of the Respondent in terminating the services is in violation of Section - 25G and H of the ID Act . The Respondent Management adopted an unfair labour practice and denied employment to the petitioner . The alleged contract or agreement signed by the petitioner cannot overrule the provisions of the ID Act. The action of the Respondent in giving the work to the outsider through tender system and get the work done through the petitioner which the petitioner was originally doing under the Respondent is nothing short of unfair labour practice is sham and nominal . Therefore , the action ofthe Respondent in not regularizing the services of the petitioner but terminating his services is illegal , arbitrary , mala fide and colourable exercise ofpower . Hence , for all these reasons , the petitioner prays an award may be passed in his favour for reinstatement with all attendant benefits .
4. As against this , the Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged the petitioner was not engaged by the Respondent Management as Part-time Casual Mazdoor but only on contract basis for contingent work that too for short spells . The petitioner did not perform any regular work as claimed by him nor there was any control exerted by the Respondent over him . As per the orders of the higher-ups all persons like the petitioner were terminated by the Respondent Management and the petitioner was terminated w.e.f. 1-2-1998 . All the work was assigned on The petitioner was employed as a Part- time Delivery Messenger at the Telegraphic Office , Villupuram w.e.f. 12-10-1993 . Even though , he would be given work for 6 hours a day , he has worked for more than 6 hours on several days . Thus the petitioner has completed 480 days of continuous service in a period of 24 calendar months and as such he is deemed to have attained the permanent status as per the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment ofPermanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 . The petitioner has worked 1704.45 hours in 1994 , 1734.00 hours in 1995 and 1815.30 hours in 1996 and 1705.00 hours in 1997, thus , he has worked more than 275 days a 3 ( ii ) ]
[PART II-SEC.
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4330
a continuous period of 24 calendar months and he further contended as per the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen ) Act , 1981 , he is entitledto the benefits of the Act and deemed to be a regular employee . It is the further contention of the petitioner that the work done by him is perennial in nature and therefore his services is to be regularized in the Respondent Management .
contract basis through tender . It cannot be said that the work done by the petitioner is perennial in nature but it is only on need basis . After the termination , the petitioner opted to work with the tenderers . The petitioner's application before the CAT was dismissed on the ground that the action taken by the department is proper . Even before the High Court in the WP, the Hon'ble Division Bench of the High Court was pleased to dismiss the said WP and therefore the petitioner's claim is not maintainable . In the Respondent Management for the Casual Labour who are engaged on full time basis in the year 1993 , a scheme was framed for grant of temporary status and regularization , since the petitioner was working as Contract Labour, he was excluded from the purview of the scheme. From 1998 , the Respondent Management was not engaging any Casual Labourer and the work had been let out on contract . Therefore , there is no violation of any provisions of law more particularly Section - 25F of the ID Act. The Respondent have trot engaged any new recruits and there is no violation of Section - 25G or H. The petitioner was engaged only as a Part - time Messenger and there is no regular post as Part- time Messenger , hence the petitioner is not entitled to any relief. The petitioner mstead of establishing his case has tried to shift the onus on the Respondent . The findings by the Hon'ble High Court is on a question of law and hence the petitioner would not be entitled to any relief claimed by him . It is not correct to say that the petitioner has rendered continuous service . On the other hand , he was engaged as and when required on need basis . Hence , for all these reasons the Respondent Management prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
5. The points for determination are :
(i) Whether the action of the Respondent Management in terminating the services of the concerned employee , Sri K. Bhoopalan is legal and justified ?
( ii ) To what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ?
Point No. 1
7. As against this , the Respondent contended the concerned employee was not engaged in any permanent or regular work . He was engaged only on contract basis for contingent work for short spells . It is his further contention that the work is not perennial in nature and all along the petitioner was working on need basis in the leave vacancy and after the instructions given by the higher authorities during the year 1998 , all persons like the petitioner were disengaged and the work was assigned on contract basis through tender therefore the engagement of the petitioner on need basis and the petitioner has not worked continuously as alleged by him. Therefore , the burden of proving that the petitioner has worked continuously is upon him . For this , he has filed the copy of the payment of wages from 1993 to 1998 under Ex . W12 and also the payment of DA arrears on wages from 1994 to 1995 under Ex . W13 . The learned counsel for the Petitioner contended from the record produced by the petitioner, it is clear that the petitioner has worked more than 1600 hours and if it is divided by 8 hours a day , the actual working days comes to more than 200-215 days if the weekly holidays and national and festival holidays are taken into account, the total number of working days in a year crosses more than 275 days . Therefore , he is entitled to the benefits of the ID Act . He further argued thatThe Respondent Management without following the mandatory provisions of Section - 25 (F) has terminated the services of the petitioner and therefore the termination is void ab initio . As against this , it is the contention of the respondent that the concerned employee cannot be a member of the petitioner union and the petitioner union cannot represent the concerned employee and therefore the dispute raised by the petitioner union is not maintainable . The Respondent Management has also issued several circulars wherein it is clearly stated the non - regular employees cannot be a member of any of the recognized union and he relied on the circulars dated 24-12-1992 and 25-7-1989 to substantiate his claim which are marked as Ex . M1 and Ex . M3 .
8. But as against this , the petitioner examined the Treasurer of the Petitioner Union who produced the Bye- Laws of the Association and also the resolution passed by the petitioner union to espouse the cause of the concerned employee and others . Further , it is contended on behalf of the petitioner though the concerned employee and other employees were not members of the petitioner union , the caseofthese employees pertaining to regularization under 6. In this case , the concerned employee was examined himself as WWI and marked 16 documents and also examined one Srinivasan . the Treasurer of the Petitioner Union . On the side of the Respondent , one Manoharan , the Divisional Engineer ( Admn. ) in GMT, Vellore was examined as MWI and through him Ex. M1 to Ex . M12 are marked. The contention of the petitioner is that he was employed as Part- time Delivery Messenger at the Telegraphic Office , Villupuram Division under Ranipet CTO on regular basis and he further contended that even though he was appointed as Part -time Delivery Messenger for 6 hours , he has worked more than 6 hours on several days and thus he has completed 240 days in a continuous period of 12 calendar months and 480 days in [ भाग II- खंड 3 (ii ) ]
4331
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
the Respondent Management was raised by the Indian Telecom Employees Union ( ITEU ) and as per the bye- laws of the petitioner union , the petitioner union is entitled to espouse the cause of the employees in general and further the union passed a resolution on 31-10-2001 to esposue the cause of the concerned workman and others and continue to conduct the disputes initially raised by the ITEU . Therefore , this dispute filed by the petitioner union espousing the cause of the concerned employee is maintainable . I find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for Petitioner that the petitioner union is entitled to espouse the cause of the concerned employee As such , I find this ID is maintainable before this forum 9. The next thing to be decided in this case is whether the contention of the petitioner for reinstatement is established before this forum . No doubt , the petitioner produced Ex . W12 which are copies of the payment of wages under 80 ( C) -16 where it can be taken into consideration with regard to the fact whether the petitioner has worked more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 months . In this case , admittedly the petitioner has joined as Part - time Casual Labour and the scheme framed by the Respondent Management for regularizing the service of the part - time employees is not applicable to the petitioner. Under such circumstances , it is to be looked into whether the petitioner is establishing the fact that he has worked for more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 months preceding his termination to get the benefit underSection - 25 ( F) of the ID Act . But , on the other hand the learned counsel for the Respondent contended it is well settled by the Supreme Court and other High Courts "even if a workman has worked for more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 months , he is neither entitled to get regularization or absorption " and therefore the concerned employee is not entitled to any relief in this ID.
10. Further , it is argued on behalf of the Respondent that the concerned employee has admittedly filed an application before the CAT in OA 345/1998 in Madras Bench for reinstatement and also for regularization of his service . But , the Tribunal has clearly stated that the concerned employee is not entitled to any relief and dismissed the same . The concerned employee's WP filed against the order of CAT was also dismissed by the Division Bench of Madras High Court and therefore this petition is not maintainable before this forum .
11. The learned counsel for the Respondent further contended that the case of the concerned employee was one and the same before the CAT and this forum . When the CAT has clearly stated that the petitioner is not entitled to any relief for reinstatement or regularization , the concerned employee cannot approach this forum for the same relief and get a remedy . It is well settled by the Supreme Court in Uma Devi's case " that a temporary employee cannot get an absorption or regularization by claiming that he has worked for more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 months and it also held that an employee with open eye accepts his work is of temporary nature then he cannot seek and claim that he is entitled for regularization or absorption" . In this case , the concerned employee was only appointed as a part- time employee and his job is also not a regular one and he has worked in the Respondent Management on need basis , the work done by the petitioner cannot be said as perennial in nature , under such circumstances , he is not entitled to claim any relief much less the relief of reinstatement under the Respondent Management .
12. Then again the learned counsel for the Petitioner contended though the concered employee has approached the CAT for reinstatement and regularization , in this case, he has not asked for relief of regularization and he has only wanted reinstatement in service on the ground that he has worked for more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 months and the action of the termination by the Respondent Management without following the mandatory provisions of Section - 25 ( F ) is ab initio void and therefore , the concerned employee is entitled to reinstatement in service with consequential relief. Though . I find much force in this contention that since the concerned employee was entered in the service ofthe Respondent only as a Part- time Casual Employee and since he cannot claim any relief of reinstatement as alleged by him. Further , no inference can bedrawn from the documents produced by the petitioner that he has worked for more than 240 days in a continuous period of 12 months , under such circumstances , I am not inclined to accept that the concerned employee is entitled for reinstatement. Therefore , I find this point against the petitioner.
Point No. 2
The next point to be decided in this case is to what relief the concerned employee is entitled ?
13. In view ofmy foregoing findings that the action ofthe Respondent Management in terminating the services of the concerned employee is legal and justified. I find the concerned employee is not entitled to any relief.
14. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly .
(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 24th March , 2008 ) .
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined :-
For the I Party/Petitioner : WW1 Sri K. Bhoopalan WW2 Sri K. Srinivasan For the II Party/Management : MW1 Sri T. S.
Manoharan THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4332
Documents Marked :-
On the Petitioner's side
Date
Ex . No.
Description
Letter of the G.M. Telecom 6-12-1983
Ex.W1
7-11-1989
Ex.W2
Circular of the Telecom regarding regularization of casual labours
Ex.W3
Casual labourers (grant of temporary status regularization ) Scheme 16-2-2000
Ex.W4
Order of CAT in OA 345 of 1998
24-4-2000
Ex.W5
Order in WP 5215 to 5218 of 2000
Ex.W6
Identity card issued by Asstt. Supervisor i/ c . CTO Ranipet Ex.W7
Letter of appointment 12-11-1993
16-7-1996
Ex.W8
Notice regarding regularization of part- time casual mazdoors
16-9-1999
Ex.W9
Conversion ofpart-time casual labours
Tender notice
Ex.W10 22-9-1997
Ex.W11
Employment of contract labourers to the telegraph office for the year 1997-98 Ex.W12
Payment of wages from 1993- 1998
Ex.W13
Payment of DA arrears of wages from 1994 & 1995 Ex.W14
...Bye- laws of the Union
Resolution of the Union 30/31-10-2001
Ex.W15
21-3-2006
Ex .W16
Lok Sabha Admitted Pro- visional Starred Question Dy . No. 10145 for 19-12-2005 by Sri Ganesh Singh regarding regularization of contract workers.
On the Management's side :
Date
Ex . No.
Description
22-1-1993
Ex.M1
Copy of eligibility of temporary mazdoors and becoming DRMS for Members /Office bearers of StaffUnions
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] Date
Description
Ex . No.
30-3-1985
Ex.M2
Copy of circular regarding casual labour engagement 25-7-1989
Ex.M3
Copy of eligibility of casual labour to become office bearers ofthe Union
Ex.M4
Copy ofpreservation period of misc . records issued by the Management
Ex.M5
Copyofpreservation period of misc . records issued by the Management
5-11-2001
Ex.M6
Copy of the letter regarding adoption of the existing appointing /disciplinary / appellate authority contained in P&T Volume III with regard to Group ' C ' & ' D ' staff absorbed in BSNL
Ex.M7
Copy of list of important items to be classified under ' Other Contingencies ' and list of important articles in common use in P & T Deptt . under Liveries and Uniforms , Operational and Minor Equipment for Post Offices and RMS Offices and Purchase and Repair of Furniture 6-8-1991
Ex.M8
Copy of circular regarding regularization of services of casual workers in Gr . ' D ' posts-Relaxation of Employment Exchange procedure and Upper Age Limit
19-2-2002
Ex.M9
Copy ofAgreement ofcontract period
25-2-2003
Ex.M10
Copy of letter on Contract Labour ( Regulation & Abolition) Act , 1970 and Central Rules , 1971 made thereunder-Grant of Certi- ficate of Registration-reg .
22-6-1995
Ex.M11
Copy of Notification with regardto Recruitment Rules of Group 'D'
3-2-2003
Ex.M12
Copy of model bills with regard to Security and Maintenance of SSAs [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
4333
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
अधिनिर्णय दिनांक 5-5-08
नई दिल्ली, 11 जुलाई, 2008
अधिनिर्णय
भारत सरकार, श्रम मंत्रालय , नई दिल्ली के आदेश द्वारा निम्न निर्देश/विवाद, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( जिसे तदुपरान्त " अधिनियम " से सम्बोधित किया जायेगा ) की धारा 10( 1 ) ( घ ) के अन्तर्गत का न्यायाधिकरण को अधिनिर्णय सम्प्रेषित किया गया है :
का. आ. 2133.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार वेस्टर्न रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , कोटा के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 27/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं . एल-41012/116/2003- आई आर ( बी- I ) ] एन. एस. बोरा, आर्थिक अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 11th July, 2008
"Whether the workman Shri Kaly Singh S/ o Shri Man Singh , has worked as a Gangmanfrom 2-3-82 to 31-8-99 and whether his removal from service after holding enquiry w.e.f. 16-8-1999 by the management of Western Railway, Kota is legal and justified ? If not , what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ?"
2. निदेश/विवाद, न्यायाधिकरण में प्राप्त होने पर पंजीबद्ध उपरान्त पक्षकारों को सूचना विधिवत रूप में जारी की गयी जिस पर दोनों पक्षों की ओर से अपने-अपने अभ्यावेदन प्रस्तुत किये गये तथा पत्रावली आज साक्ष्य प्रार्थी श्रमिक हेतु नियत रखी ।
S.O. 2133. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 27/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court Kota as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Western Railway, and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 11-7-2008 .
[No. L-41012/116/2003 - IR (B - I) ] N. S. BORA, Economic Officer
अनुबंध
न्यायाधीश , औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण/केन्द्रीय /कोटा/राज.
3. आज प्रार्थी स्वयं अपनी साक्ष्य हेतु न्यायाधिकरण में उपस्थित नहीं हुआ है , ना उसकी ओर से कोई साक्ष्य- पत्र अथवा अन्य प्रलेखीय साक्ष्य प्रस्तुत की गयी है । प्रकरण साक्ष्य प्रार्थी में 7-4-06 से लम्बित चला आ रहा है । प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि ने आज उपस्थित होकर प्रकट कर दिया कि वो अब इस मामले में कोई साक्ष्य पेश नहीं करना चाहते हैं और अपनी साक्ष्य समाप्त करते हैं । अप्रार्थी नियोक्ता की ओर से भी, प्रार्थी द्वारा कोई साक्ष्य उपलब्ध नहीं करवाये जाने के कारण , कोई साक्ष्य प्रस्तुत नहीं किया जाना प्रकट किया गया ।
पीठासीन अधिकारी-वी. बद्रीलाल मीणा , आर. एच. के. एच.
निर्देश प्रकरण क्रमांकः औ.न्या./केन्द्रीय/-27/03 दिनांक स्थापित : 19-7-03
प्रसंग:
भारत सरकार, श्रम मंत्रालय , नई दिल्ली के आदेश सं. एस- 41012/116/2003- आईआर ( बी -1 ) दिनांक 4-7-03
बहस पक्षकारों की सुनी गयी, पत्रावली का अवलोकन किया गया । स्पष्टतः प्रार्थी श्रमिक द्वारा अपने क्लेम समर्थन में किसी प्रकार की कोई साक्ष्य प्रस्तुत नहीं की गयी है जिससे कि उसके कथनों की पुष्टिहो सके । इस प्रकार प्रार्थी श्रमिक अपने क्लेम/प्रकरण. को साबित करने में पूर्णतया असफल रहा है । परिणामतः प्रार्थी श्रमिक, अप्रार्थी नियोजक से, अधिनियमान्तर्गत कोई संरक्षण प्राप्त नहीं होने से किसी प्रकार का कोई अनुतोष प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी नहीं है और सम्प्रेषित निर्देश /विवाद को इसी प्रकार अधिनिर्णित कर उत्तरित किया जाता है ।
:
निदेश/विवाद अन्तर्गत धारा 10( 1 ) ( घ ) औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947
बद्रीलाल मीणा, न्यायाधीश मध्य
नई दिल्ली, 11 जुलाई , 2008
कालूसिंह पुत्र श्री मानसिंह , निवासी ग्राम रुग्गी , गडेमान के पास, तह. वीगीय, जिला कोटा । प्रार्थी श्रमिक
एवं
डिविजनल रेलवे मैनेजर, वेस्टर्न रेलवे , कोटा ।
अप्रार्थी नियोजक
उपस्थित:
का. आ. 2134.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नेशनल बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2, चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 195/99) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
प्रार्थी श्रमिक की ओर से प्रतिनिधि :
श्री अनिल शर्मा
अप्रार्थी नियोजक की ओर से प्रतिनिधि: श्री नरेश शर्मा
[सं. एल-12012/110/1999- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी 274591/08-36 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008 / SRAVAΝΑ 11 , 1930
4334
New Delhi , the 11th July, 2008
of full knowledge of the proceedings of this reference. The reference is as old as referred to this Tribunal in the year 1999. Affidavits yet not have been filed . Rejoinder claim petition has also not filed by the workman . On repeated calls since morning no one is present . Accordingly, the reference is dismissed in default for non- prosecution . Central Government be informed accordingly. File to be consigned .
G.K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer
Chandigarh
30-6-08
S.O. 2134. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 195/99 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of PNB , and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 11-7-2008 .
नई दिल्ली, 11 जुलाई, 2008
[No. L- 12012/ 110/1999- IR (B - II) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA , PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT - I , CHANDIGARH .
का. आ. 2135.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार, इलाहाबाद बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. II, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 10/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
Case No. I.D. 195/1999
[सं. एल-12011/158/1999- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 11th July, 2008
Applicant
Sh. Prabhjit Singh , C/o D.P. Tank , President , NBIEU (NZ) , EG - 810 -A, Jalandhar City
Versus
The Regional Manager,
Respondent
Punjab National Bank , Regional Office, Dhyan Singh Complex , Ludhiana 141008
APPEARANCES :
S.O. 2135. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 10/2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. II , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Allahabad Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 11-7-2008 .
For the workman : None
[No. L- 12011/ 158 / 1999 - IR ( B - II) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer For the management : Sh. Rajesh Gupta
ANNEXURE
AWARD
Passed on 30-6-2008
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT- II , NEW DELHI
Central Govt. vide notification No. L- 12012/ 110/99- IR (B- II ) dated 29th September , 1999 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :
PRESENT :
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 10/2000
IN THE MATTER OF :
"Whether the action of the management of Punjab National Bank in awarding the punishment of Dismissal from service to Sh. Prabhjit Singh is legal and just? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date ?"
Claimant
Sh . Dharmender Kumar , C/o General Secretary, All India Allahabad Bank Employees Association, Baroda House , New Delhi
2.No one is present, on behalf of workman . Learned representative of the management Shri Rajesh Gupta is present. Since morning this reference has been called number of times . At 10.45 a.m. , it was ordered to be placed before this Tribunal once again at 2 p.m. It is 2.30 now and on repeated calls no one is present, in spite of having [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
4335 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
Versus
The Zonal Office , 17 , Parliament Street ,
Allahabad Bank Building, New Delhi - 110001
Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that he has worked continuously from May 1997 to October 1998 and he has completed 240 days . He is entitled to reinstatement as his services were terminated without payment of retrenchment compensation . He was engaged against a permanent post.
Respondent
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 12011/ 158/ 99 - IR ( B - II ) Central Governmentdt. 7-2-2000 has referred the following point for adjudication:
It was submitted from the side of the management that there were regular peons in the bank for discharging regular work . His services were taken on daily wages basis for purchasing water , filling water in the cooler . Payment to him was made on the day he performed his duties.
The point runs as hereunder-
The workman has filed 17 photocopies vouchers . These vouchers relate to a particular date . The worman hasreceived charges for work, so at the best, the workman hasfiled proofof work of 17 days . The workman has filed photocoy of charge book.
"Whether the action of the management of Allahabad Bank , Regional Office , Arya Samaj Road, Karol Bagh , New Delhi and the Sr. Manager , Allahabad Bank , Baroda House , New Delhi in stopping from services/duty to Sh . Dharmender Kumar w.e.f. 9-10-1998 , engaged by the bank as daily wages employee in the Baroda House Branch of the Bank is valid , justified and legal? If not, to what relief the said workman is entitled to ?"
The case of the workman is that he was employed as Class - IVemployee at Baroda House Branch at Allahabad Bank w.e.f.16-5-1997 . He was paid Rs . 40.50 per day and he was assured that he will be confirmed in the employment as he was employed against permanent post .
From perusal of these charges book it appears that the workman has worked for 15 days in June 1997 , 8-10 days in July 1997 , thereafter on some papers his name does not appear . From perusal of these charges book also , the workman can be said to be worked for 3 months counting all his working days . On some of these charges book the name of the workman does not appear. So from the documents it becomes quite obvious that the workman has not performed 240 days work . He has been engaged for specific work as per the exigencies as and when required and payment to him has been made on that date only.
That the services of the workman were illegally terminated on 9-10-1998 . That he made several representation but his case was not considered so he has raised this dispute.
From perusal of the photocopy vouchers it appears that the workman has worked for 17 days and from other vouchers for almost 3 months .
The workman has not filed any document to show thatmonthly payment to him has been made and he was engaged as casual labour. The management has filed Peon Book which indicates that Sh . Rajni Tandon , Mrs. Pilai Rani , Jai Shree were working as Peons .
That his services have been illegally terminated without payment of retrenchment compensation and one month's pay in lieu ofnotice . The case of the management is that , the workman was engaged on contract basis for specific work for purchasing water for cleaning shelves as and when the exigencies of such work arose in the bank and was paid for performance of the specific work onthat day itself. Payment was based on the work .
The management witness has stated that the workman was engaged in view of the exigencies for a particular day and payment to him was made on that day itself. The charges book and the vouchers prove that the workman was engaed for a particular day in a month and he was paid for that day.
Thatthe workman was not engaged as casual labour against any post . He has not completed 240 days service in a calendar year or preceding 12 months from the date of termination of services .He was engaged on daily rate basis and payment to him was made on that date itself.
The workman applicant has filed rejoinder . In the rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement. The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement .
The workman has not filed any proof that payment to him has been made on monthly basis , so he has worked for a few days in a month and he has received the payment for that day . His engagement was occasional . He has not completed 240 days work, so there is no violation of Section 25 F of the ID Act, 1947 and the workman is not entitled to get any relief.
Evidence ofboth the parties has been taken .
The reference is replied thus :
Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.
The action of the management of Allahabad Bank Regional Office , Arya Samaj Road , Karok Bagh , THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4336
New Delhi and the Sr. Manager , Allahabad Bank , Baroda House , New Delhi in stopping from services / duty to Sh . Dharmender Kumar w.e.f. 9-10-1998 , engaged by the bank as daily wages employee in the Baroda House Branch of the Bank is valid , justified and legal . The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.
The award is given accordingly.
Date: 30-6-2008
R.N.RAI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 11 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2136.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नेशनल बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 225/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12012/68/1998- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 11 July , 2008
S.O. 2136. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 225/1998 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Punjab National Bank and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 11-7-2008 .
[No. L- 12012/ 68 / 1998 - IR ( B - II) ] RAJINDER KUMAR , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT- II , NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer I.D. No. 225/1998
IN THE MATTER OF :
Sh . N.S. Chauhan ,
21, Palika Colony,
Bahadurgarh,
Distt: Rohtak ( Haryana)
Versus
The Sr. Regional Manager ,
PNB, R.O. South Delhi Atma Ram House ,
12th Floor , Tolstoy Marg ,
New Delhi
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
AWARD
The Ministry of Labour by its letter No. L- 12012/ 68/98 - IR ( B - II ) Central Governmentdt. 7-12-1998 has referred the following point for adjudication:
The point runs as hereunder :-
"Whether the action of the management of Punjab National Bank in dismissing the services ofSh . N. S. Chauhan w.e.f. 13-2-1997 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the said workman is entitled ?"
The case of the workman is that the following. illegal charges were leveled against him . The charges are as under :-
It isreported that an amount of Rs . 2.00 lacs was withdrawn by you on 10-7-90 by preparing credit cash voucher with the heading "Cash in transit " . The voucher was signed by you and the date of the voucher as well as Sl .No. ofthe same have been found to be tampered with.
The above entry of Rs . 2.00 lacs was adjusted on 13-7-90 by preparing another cash deposit voucher with the heading "Remittance in transit " . This voucher was prepared by you as also the cash was deposited and receipted by you .
As per the procedure when cash is remitted to Currency Chest/branch , the entry is reversed on receipt of TPO Credit advice from the said Currency Chest/ branch.
From the aforesaid, it appears that neither the cash was deposited with the branch nor actually remitted to the currency chest which is in violation of bank's procedures . Thus , it is apprehended that the cash was misutilized by you and after pursuasion , the amount was deposited in cash by you on 12-9-91 and the shortage wasmade good .
That no proper opportunity was given to the workman to adduce his evidence . Original documents were not produced during the course of the inquiry. Only two witnesses were examined. The principles of natural justice have not been observed by the management during the course of inquiry . Inquiry proceedings have not been held as per the provisions of the BPS .
The case of the management is that , that Shri Chauhan while working as Head Cashier at BO : Hari Nagar was served with the chargesheet dated 31-10-91 whereby it was alleged that he had withdrawn sum of Rs . 2 lakh on 10-7-90 by preparing credit voucher with the heading ' Cash in Transit ' . The voucher in question voucher was found to be tampered by him . It was further alleged that the said voucher of Rs. 2 Lakh was adjusted by him on 13-7-90 by preparing another cash debit voucher with the heading ' Remittance in [भाग II- खंड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
4337
Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.
Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that he has not been afforded proper opportunity to adduce his evidence . The Inquiry Officer did not provide him the original slips and vouchers .
Itwas submitted from the side of the management that the management examined two witnesses . The Inquiry Officer gave two occasions to the workman to adduce evidence in defence but neither the workman nor the DR turned up so the Inquiry Officer concluded his findings . The workman himself withdrewfrom the inquiry proceedings . The Inquiry Officer held the charges proved on the basis of evidence of two witnesses and documents filed in the inquiry proceedings . The workman himself has admitted his guist .
Itbecomes quite vivid from perusal of the inquiry proceedings that the Inquiry Officer has given two dates for defence evidence . Neither the workman nor his DR appeared for adducing defence evidence .
The workman has admitted in MEX 10 as under :
That the cash was being withdrawn by him to debit remittance in transit account for sorting of notes . After sorting of notes the same was being deposited by him in Branch/ Currency Chest .He has further admitted that cash during the intervening period was kept by him in the cash safe lying in the bank's premises outside the strong room in his custody. He has further stated in his letter thatit was against the bank procedure. I had no intention to embezzle the money.
I have perused the proceedings of the Inquiry Officer. He has given detailed findings discussing the evidence of Sh . D. S. Katyal , Manager , Audit and Sh . M. L. Sachdeva , Assistant Manager .
Tansit' . It was alleged that neither cash was deposited with the branch nor the same was actually debited to the currency chest in violation of the Bank's procedure and thus he misutilised the said amount which was ultimately deposited by him on 12-9-91 . It was alleged that the said acts constituted gross misconduct within the meaning of Para 19.5 (j ) of the Bipartite Settlement . The reply of Shri Chauhan to the said chargesheet was received on 3-11-91 which was not considered to be satisfactory and the Disciplinary Authority ordered Departmental Enquiry vide order dated 12-11-91 . The Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Bipartite Settlement during which all reasonable opportunities was afforded to Shri Chauhan and the Enquiry Officer submitted his report dated 6-3-95 to the Disciplinary Authority holding allegations as proved. The Disciplinary Authority thereafter vide show cause notice 6-12-96 proposed punishment of ' Dismissal without Notice' and also fixed 14-12-96 for personal hearing against the proposed punishment . Shri Chauhan was againprovided 9-12-96 . The Disciplinary Authority had fixed 14-12-96, 4-1-97 , 25-10-97 did not appear before the Disciplinary Authority for personal hearing without any reasonable basis . Since despite various opportunities , Shri Chauhan did not appear for the personal hearing, the Disciplinary Authority vide order dated 13-3-97 confirmed the punishment of 'Dismissal without Notice' and further directed that Shri Chauhan would not be entitled to any monetary benefit except from the subsistence allowance to any monetary benefit except from the subsistence allowance already paid for the period he remained under suspension, Shri Chauhan preferred an appeal dated 22-3-97 before the Appellate Authority . The Appellate Authority also fixed 15-11-97 , 5-12-97 and6-1-98 for personal hearing . However , Shri Chauhan again did not appear before the Appellate Authority without any due and valid reasons and the Appellate Authority thereafter vide order dated 6-1-98 rejected the appeal filed by Shri Chauhan after taking into consideration the entire material on the record.
The workman has admitted that he withdrew the money by preparing credit cash voucher with the heading cash in transit . So he has admitted the preparation of the voucher. In the circumstances no prejudice can be said to be caused to him in case original vouchers were not placed on records:
Itissubmitted that the disciplinary action has been taken against Shri Chauhan in accordance with the provisions ofthe Bipartite Settlement and the punishment inflicted upon Shri Chauhan is commensurate with the gravity of the allegations established against him . It is further submitted that the orders passed by the Disciplinary Authority as well as Appellate Authority are valid and legal and theydo not suffer from any infirmity whatsoever .
The witnesses have stated that all the credit vouchers were prepared by him and " cash in transit " was written by him , so the preparation of credit cash voucher is admitted to the workman. It is also admitted to the workman that an amount of Rs . 2 lakh was not deposited in the strong room whereas as per the rules it was his duty to deposit cash in strong room .
The workman applicant has filed rejoinder . In the rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement . The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement.
Evidence ofboth the parties has been taken.
The Inquiry Officer has further given the finding that the CSE mis - utilized / mis - appropriated bank's fund to the tune of Rs . 2 Lakh from 10-7-1990 to 12-9-1991 and caused heavy loss to the bank.
[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 /SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4338
it . In a domestic inquiry once a conclusion is deduced from the evidence , it is not permissible to assail that conclusion even though it is possible for some other authority to arrive at a different conclusion on the same evidence.
The workman has admitted that he deposited the cash of Rs . 2 Lakh on 12-9-1991 in the strong room. The workman has prepared several credit vouchers and wrote " cash in transit " on those vouchers but he did not deposit the same in the strong room . There is no force in the contention of the workman that he kept the cash in safe custody.He cannot be the custodian of Rs . 2 Lakh which should be in the strong room of the bank .
Ithas been held in this case that in domestic inquiry evidence of a solitary witness is sufficient to hold the chargesproved.
It has been held in 2001 ( 89 ) FLR 427 as under:
From perusal of the inquiry proceedings and the findings of the Inquiry Officer it becomes quite obvious that the workman prepared cash vouchers on different dates to show that money was taken from strong room and it was infact deposited but he kept the money in his custody.
"Itis well settled that a conclusion or a finding of fact arrived at in a disciplinary inquiry can be interfered with by the court only when there is no material for the said conclusion ; or that on the materials , the conclusion cannot be that of a reasonable man . "
The workman has admitted that he prepared all the credit vouchers . He kept the money with him . The Inquiry Officer has held that the workman misutilized Rs . 2 Lakh for almost one year . He might have floated it in the market .
It cannot be said that this case is of no evidence . Two witnesses have deposed against the workman . The workman has himself admitted the preparation of credit vouchers and keeping cash of Rs . 2 Lakh in his custody .
The punishment imposed on the workman is quite appropriate to the gravity of the mis - conduct . He kept Rs . 2 Lakh of the bank in his own custody illegally. No interference is required.
The reference is replied thus:
The Inquiry Officer has given his findings on the evidence of two witnesses and admission of the workman that he prepared credit vouchers and wrote cash transit and kept the money with him . It is correct that the workman has not adduced any defence evidence but in the circumstances of the case no defence evidence is required . He has admitted preparation of cash credit vouchers and writing " cash in transit" . He has admitted that he did not deposit the money in the strong room.
The action of the management of Punjab National Bank in dismissing the services of Sh. N. S. Chauhan w.e.f. 13-2-1997 is legal and justified. The workman applicant is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for .
The award is given accordingly.
Date : 26-6-2008
R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer He has acted against the rules of the Bank. The findings ofthe Inquiry Officer are quite just , the workman misutilized Rs . 2 Lakh for almost a year .
नई दिल्ली, 11 जुलाई, 2008
का. आ. 2137.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार प्रसार भारती के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 399/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । It has been held that in a domestic inquiry the strict and sophisticated rules of evidence under the Evidence Actmay not apply . All materials which are logically probative for a prudent mind are permissible . There is no allergy to hearsay evidence provided it has reasonable nexus and credibility . The departmental authorities and administrative tribunals must be careful in evaluating such material and should not glibly swallow what is strictly speaking not relevant under the Evidence Act .
[सं. एल-42012/124/2003- आई ओर ( सी एम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गोड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 11th July, 2008
It has been further held that the sufficiency of evidence in proof of the finding by a domestic tribunal is beyond scrutiny . Absence of any evidence in support of a finding is certainly available for the court to look into because it amounts to an error of law apparent on the record.
It has been held in 1972 (25 ) FLR 45 as under :-
S.O. 2137.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 399/2004 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Prasar Bharati and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 11-7-2008 .
[No. L -42012/ 124/2003 - IR (CM - II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer "An Industrial Tribunal would not be justified in characterizing the finding recorded in the domestic inquiry as perverse unless it can be shown that such a finding is not supported by any evidence , or is entirely opposed to the whole body of the evidence adduced before [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
4339 ANNEXURE
through their Advocates and filed their claim and counter statements respectively .
3. The allegations in the claim statement are briefly asfollows:
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT , CHENNAI
Thursday, 27th February , 2008
PRESENT :
K. Jayaraman , Presiding Officer
I.D. No. 399/2004
[ In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 ( A ) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , between the Management of Prasar Bharathi , Broadcasting Corporation of India and their workman]
BETWEEN :
The General Secretary
: I Party/ Petitioner
Broadcasting Engineering
Employees Union
10 , Ayanavaram Road , Ayanavaram, Chennai -600023
Versus
The Administrative Officer
: II Party/
Prasar Bharati
Management
Broadcasting Corporation of India
Doordarshan Kendra , Chennai -600 005
APPEARANCE :
For the Petitioner
: Sri P. Chandrasekaran ,
Advocate
For the Management : Sri M. Venkadeswaran,
ACGSC
AWARD
The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L - 42012/ 124/ 2003 - IR ( CM - II ) dated 29-7-2004 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is :
"Whether the claim by the Broadcasting Engineering Employees Union against the management of Broadcasting Corporation of India, Doordarshan Kendra , Chennai in seeking consequential benefits for Sri R. Ayyasamy , General Secretary of the Union is legal and justified . If so , to what relief the workman is entitled. ?"
2. After the receipt of the Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 399/2004 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance
The Prasar Bharathi Corporation is established on 23-11-1997 under the Prasar Bharathi Act , 1990 . The employees of erstwhile AIR and Doordarshan are on deemed deputation with the Corporation and also the Prasar Bharathi recruited about 1500 employees of its own . The concerned workman in the reference is the General Secretary of the petitioner union and his present designation is Sr. Engineering Assistant . The petitioner union was formed on 5-10-1998 and it has been informed to the Respondent Management on 18-11-1988 . Meanwhile on 24-4-1998, the concerned employee was promoted as Assistant Engineer and transferred to LPT, Belgaum from Doordarshan Kendra ( DDK) , Chennai which was challenged by him in OA No. 1011/2000 before CAT since the order of promotion issued without any Recruitment Rules . The concerned employee received the above said promotion directly from DG , AIR, New Delhiby Regd . Post and on 6-11-1998 , the concerned employee submitted a letter for foregoing the promotion and sought to be retained in Doordarshan Kendra, Madras . But on the same date , the Management despatched the Relieving Order through post with proposed relieving date as 20-11-1998 . On 20-11-1998 , notwithstanding the fact that the concerned employee waive the promotion order resulting in his transfer from DDK , Chennai to LPT , Belgaum , the Management sought to relieve him on the ground that there were surplus posts. But in a strange manner , after relieving the concerned employee and also the President of the Petitioner union on 20-11-1998 on the basis of surplus , the Management accommodated two Sr. Engg . Asstts . Viz . Smt . Mohanambal and Sri Ekambaram in their places on 23-11-1998 . Again on 10-2-1999 , the concerned employee viz . Sri Ayyasamy was transferred from DDK, Chennai to LPT Renebennur ( Karnataka) and on the same day, the Management accommodated another Sr. Engg . Asstt. Sri G. Venkataraman at Doordarshan Kendra , Chennai . The above said transfer order was also challenged in the above OA 1011/2000 filed by the concerned employee before the CAT. The said OA was allowed by the Central Administrative Tribunal ( CAT) on 4-1-2001 with consequential benefits including salary from 21-11-1998 to 4-1-2001 . The President of the petitioner union has filed a Writ Petition in WP No. 3512/1999 and got an interim order for salary and when the concerned employee on 21-4-1999 made a representation seeking payment of salary , it wa [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2, 2008 /SRAVAΝΑ 11 , 1930
4340.
not granted . On 9-1-1999 and 20-6-2000 , the petitioner union raised a dispute before RLC( C) relating to non - payment of salary to the concerned employee and it was pending . Then on 5-1-2001 after the disposal of the OA No. 1011/2000 viz . the concerned employees joined the services . While so on 14-3-2001 , once again the concerned employee was transferred to LPT Renebennur ( Karnataka ) but the said order was not given effect to . In the meantime , the Management has preferred a WP before the Hon'ble High Court against the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in OA 1011/2000 which was also pending before the High Court. While so on 30-1-2002 , once again the concerned employee was issued an order of transfer transferring him as Sr. Engg. Asstt . to LPT Gulbarga (Karnataka) . Again , the concerned employee made a representation on February , 2002 and the petitioner union filed a WP 6961/2002 before the Hon'ble High Court . On 17-9-2002, the High Court allowed the WP filed by the Management holding that the Respondent Management has power to transfer the deemed deputationists and on 8-10-2002 , the concerned employce was issued Relieving Order asking him to join in Gulbarga and on 10-10-2002 he was relieved. Therefore , the petitioner union raised another Industrial Dispute for his salary from 11-10-2002 that has resulted in reference ID 341 / 2004. Therefore , the petitioner union is not seeking the relief for the payment of salary to the concerned employee for the period from 21-11-1998 to 4-1-2001. The Respondent Management acting upon waiver of promotion but still persisting in the transfer was neither reasonable nor fair and is arbitrary and unjust and opposed to Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Further , the Respondent Management relieved the concerned employee from DDK , Chennai on 20-11-1998 in the name of surplus but on the other hand , it has accommodated two Sr. Engg . Asstts . viz . Sri Ekambaram and Smt . Mohanambal at Doordarshan Kendra , Chennai on 23-11-1998 which clearly shows the mala fide intention/ unfair labour practice of the Respondent Management . While claiming salary from 21-11-1998 to 4-1-2001 , the Hon'ble CAT dismissed the same by ex - parte order but the same relief has been allowed in its order dated 4-1-2001 in OA No. 1011/01 . Further , the concerned employee is a protected workman of the petitioner union and therefore the transfer of a protected workman is not legal. Hence , for all these reasons the union prays an award may be passed holding that concerned employee is entitled to full salary and consequential benefits from 21-11-1998 to 4-1-2001 .
4. As against this , the Respondent in his counter statement contended that the Respondent Management has no knowledge about the registration of the petitioner union . The details /particulars regarding the registration number, names of members , bye - law and area of operation have not been communicated to the Respondent till date. It is admittedby the petitioner union that employees working in AIR and Doordarshan are still Govt. servants on deemed deputation to Prasar Bharati and they further alleged that they are governed by CCS Rules , hence this dispute is liable to be dismissed in limini . Though the concerned employee alleged that he is the General Secretary of the Petitioner union , all the letters/ communication sent to his address were returned by him and the postal authorities returned the same with an endorsement "No such person " or " Party out of station" or "Address not known " etc. This itself clearly establish the adamant attitude of the concerned employee not to go on-transfer . Only owing to necessity of leadership at LPT , Belgaum and to comply with Directorate's instructions , the concerned employee was relieved from the Chennai Doordarshan Kendra in the interest of service . Though, it is alleged that the concerned employee has given a representation for his retention, he alleged in that letter for his retention , on domestic/health grounds without any supporting evidence to substantiate his claim . He has not mentioned anything about his status in the alleged union and requested for retention at Chennai . The two Sr. Engg . Asstts . mentioned by the petitioner were accommodated in DDK, Chennai only during December , 1998 and January , 1999 against the vacancies arose consequent to the relief of two other Sr. Engg . Asstts . in December , 1998 and Jan. , 1999 and not as alleged by the petitioner. With regard to transfer order dated 10-2-1999 issued in respect of Sri G. Venkatraman , it is clearly mentioned that he was accommodated against the resultant vacancy of Sri Pedanna who has been promoted from DDK, Chennai . The concerned employee has questioned the Transfer Order before the CAT in his individual capacity and not as an office bearer of the union . After keeping quiet for two years from Nov. , 1998 , he has filed the OA in the year 2000 in his capacity as Govt . servant in September , 2000. No doubt , he has reported for duty at DDK, Chennai on 5-1-2001 viz . after the order passed in OA 1011/2000 and he was permitted to join duty subject to Hon'ble High Court verdict in the appeal being filed against the order passed in OA 1011/2000 and the Hon'ble High Court by its order dated 26-4-2001 granted interim stay ofthe operation of the Tribunal's order , subsequently, in WP in 8502/2001 which was filed against the order passed in OA No.1011 /2000 allowed by Hon'ble High Court dated 17-9-2002 , it is the admitted fact that the concerned employee has neither reported for duty at the transferred place nor submitted any leave application for regularization of his absence period but remained absent from duty from 21-01-1998 to 4-1-2001 . Therefore , the 4341
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008 / श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii ) ]
consequential benefits for Sri R. Ayyasamy, General Secretary of the Union is legal and justified?
(ii ) To what relief the concerned employee is entitled?
Point No. 1
action of the Respondent Mariagement in not paying salary for the unauthorized absence is justified on the principles of "No work No Pay " . Even in the case of Sri Uthandavan , the President of the petitioner union was also revoked by the Hon'ble High Court by its order dated 4-9-2003 and action was taken against him to recover the salary paid to him . But in the case of the concerned employee, he has not been paid salary for the period for which he has not attended anywhere . The memo dated 14-3-2001 is only an intimation about the promotion order dated 20-5-2000 which is neither a Transfer Order hör a Relieving Order and the petitioner unión has misinterpreted deliberately only with a view to gain sympathy. Even in the clarification petition filed by the concerned employee , the Hon'ble High Court on 17-3-2003 has rejected the claim of the petitioner regarding the claim for payment of the salary for the period ofunauthorized absence. The concerned employee cannot refuse transfer when it is an incidence in service and every time he was offered promotion , the concerned employee cannot insist or expect that he should be retained at Chennai itseif on foregoing promotion . On 1-2-1999 a modified order was issued by the DG , DDK , New Delhi and transferring him in the same capacity to TVRC , Ranebennur ( Karnataka ) , however , due to typographical mistake , the word "modified order " was omitted to be mentioned in that order . Hence , for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim is not maintainable before this Tribunal.
8. In this case , the petitioner union alleged the various orders of transfer made by the Respondent Management against Sri R. Ayyasamy, the General Secretary of the petitioner union are not valid and therefore even though he has been relieved on 20-11-1998 , he is deemed to be in service of the Respondent Corporation. As against this , the Respondent namely the DDK, Chennai has stated that the concerned employee filed many litigations against the transfer in various forums which clearly establishes the fact that he has avoided the transfer by some means or other. Though the concerned employee is holding a transferable post, he has avoided the transfer and the allegation that he has been elected member of the petitioner union is only an afterthought and no details of formation of union or particulars viz . the total number of members of the union were intimatedto the Respondent Management . Under such circumstances, the claim of the petitioner union that the concerned employee is a protected workman and the question of transfer are not valid. It is well settled all public servants whether working as office bearers of the union/association or not , are also liable to be transferred. Though, the concerned employee claimed salary from 20-11-1998 to 4-1-2001 , since , the concerned employee has not joined the new station nor submitted any leave application for the period of absence, he is not entitled to salary as claimed by the union on the principle of no work, no pay and they contended that the claim is not maintainable before this Tribunal .
5. Again, the petitioner in his rejoinder alleged that thepresent employees of Prasar Bharati are coming under industry as per the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgement reported in 1998 , 1 , SLJ , Page 377 , it is false to allege that the concerned employee has refused to receive the Transfer Order from the Respondent Management , this statement was made only to assassinate the character of the concerned employee for this case . In the year 1999 itself, the petitioner union submitted its union members andbye- laws of the union to the Respondent Management . After coming to know the existence ofthe Petitioner union , the Management did not want any trade unions , hence they started to victimize the employees who were active persons to form the trade union .
6. With the leave of the Court , the Respondent in his reply to the rejoinder has alleged the petitioner union has failed to furnish the list of the existing members of the petitioner union to the Management . Even in the evidence given by the Vice -President of the petitioner union in ID 28/2005 , she has clearly stated the list of members belonging to union will not be given to the management . Hence , he prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .
7. Points for determination are :
9. But again on behalf of the petitioner union , it is contended that the concerned employee has been transferred and promoted as Asstt. Engineer, Belgaum and he having foregone the promotion, he should have been retained at DDK, Chennai . Further more, in case the Respondent Management was keen that the concerned employee should go on transfer as a matter ofpolicy, they should have made it clear to him that he will have to suffer transfer in which case the concerned employee should have gone in the promoted post . But on the other hand , acting upon the waiver of promotion but still persisting in the transfer was neither reasonable nor fair and it is arbitrary, unjust and opposed to Art . 14 of the Constitution of India . In this case , the submission of the petitioner union was that they informed the Management about the formation of the union and though the Respondent Management has contended that they have not received any communication with regard to the (i ) Whether the claim of the petitioner union against the Respondent Corporation in seeking
374561/08--37 4342
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/ SRAVANA 11 , 1930 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
the salary for the period of his absence but in the case of Uthandavan also the order passed by the CAT was revoked by the Hon'ble High Court and it was clearly stated that Uthandavan cannot be allowed to receive salary without doing any work established that the order of transfer was not stayed. Accordingly, the action was taken against him to recover the salary but further the matter is pending before the Hon'ble High Court in respect of Uthandavan and final order was not passed in that case . Therefore , the petitioner union cannot take advantage of the order passed by the Tribunal in Uthandavan's case . It is well settled by the Supreme Court and also by the High Courts where a public servant is transferred , he must comply with the order but if there be any joining difficulty in proceeding on transfer , it is open to him to make representation to the competent authority for modification or cancellation of transfer order . If the order is not cancelled he must carry out the order of transfer and a public servants has no justification to avoid or evade transfer order merely on the ground of having made a representation on the ground of difficulty in moving from one place to another and if he fails to proceed on transfer in compliance to the Transfer Order , he would expose himself to disciplinary action under relevant rules . The learned counsel for the Respondent further contended in this case though the petitioner union alleged so many things , the concerned employee has not given any representation for the modification or cancellation on valid grounds . Under such circumstances , since he fails to proceed on transfer as per the transfer order passed by the Respondent Management , he is liable for disciplinary action and he cannot claim salary for unauthorized absence by raising this dispute .
formation of the petitioner union , it was established by the letter of correspondence that it was informed to the Respondent Management with regard to the formation of the petitioner union . The Respondent Management who did not like the formation of the union has given pinpricks to the members of the petitioner union and only because of that on 24-4-1998 , the concerned employee who worked as Sr. Engg . Asstt . and who was under deputation promoted as Asstt. Engineer and transferred to LPT Belgaum from DDK, Chennai which was challenged in OA No. 1011/2000 wherein it was alleged that the order of promotion issued by the Respondent Management is not valid without any Recruitment Rules . While so , on 6-11-1998 , the concerned employee submitted a letter for foregoing the promotion and sought to be retained in DDK, Chennai but on the same date on 6-11-1998 , the Respondent Management despatched the Relieving Order through post which proposed the relieving date as 20-11- 1998. Further , notwithstanding the above fact , the Management sought to relieve him on the ground on the date that there are surplus post but in a strange manner after relieving the concerned employee and the President of the petitioner union on 20-11-1998 on the basis of surplus , the Management accommodated two Sr. Engg . Asstts . viz . Smt . Mohanambai and Sri Ekambaram in their place on 23-11-1998 . Again on 10-2-1999 , the concerned employee was transferred from DDK, Chennai to LPT Renebennur ( Karnataka) . On the same date, the Management accommodated another Sr. Engg. Asstt . viz . Sri Venkatraman in his place. Though , the CAT has allowed the submission filed by the concerned employee questioning the transfer and also the salary from 20-11-1998 to 4-1-2001 , the Respondent Management has notpaid the salary thus the workman has become a victim only because he was the General Secretary of the Union and he was treated with arbitrariness for his trade union activities . Therefore , the concerned employee is entitled for the full salary and consequential benefits from 20-11-1998 to 4-1-2001 .
11. I find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent because in this case though the petitioner union alleged so many things , they have not stated that this order of transfer made by the Respondent Manager is not valid in law . Since the concerned employee was holding a transferable post, he has no power to question the transfer order . Though , it is alleged that the concerned employee has been promoted and posted to a place and the subsequent order was passed only inthe same post which is not valid in law, I find here again there is no substance because the concerned employee has neither accepted the promotion nor joined the new station in the promoted post . On the other hand, he has evaded all the letters /correspondences sent by the Respondent Management to him with regard to his transfer and also promotion. Therefore, the grounds raised by the petitioner with regard to the claim of the concerned employee iswithout any substance . As the learned counsel for the Respondent shown that the concerned employee has not given any application for leave and since he has notjoined the transferred post, I find he is not entitled for salary as claimed by the petitioner union on the principles of ' no work , no pay' . Therefore , I find this point against the petitioner union.
10. But the Respondent Management has contended no doubt the CAT has passed an order that the Respondent Management has no power to transfer its employees , it was reversed by the Hon'ble High Court in the WP No. 8502/2001 . Even while he was permitted to join duty, itwas made clear to him the same was subject to Hon'ble High Court's verdict in the appeal being filed against the order of Hon'ble CAT in OA 1011/2000 . It is admitted fact that the concerned employee has neither reported for duty at the transferred place nor submitted any leave application for regularization of his absence period and he was all along remained absent from duty from 21-11-1998 to 4-1-2001 . Therefore , the action taken by the Respondent Management for not paying the salary and for the unauthorized absence is fully justified on the principles of ' no work, no pay' . No doubt, the petitioner union has cited the case of Sri Uthandavan viz . the President of the petitioner union that he has been paid [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii) ]
Point No. 2
The next point to be decided in this case to what relief the concerned employee is entitled ?
12. In view of my foregoing findings that the concerned employee viz . Sri R. Ayyasamy is not entitled to claim the salary from 20-11-1998 to 4-1-2001 since he is not joined the transferred place and since has not given any leave application, I find the concerned employee is not entitled to any relief.
13. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly .
(Dictated to the P.A. transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 27th February , 2008)
K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer
Witnesses Examined :
: WW1 Smt . K. Mymoona Forthe I Party/ Petitioner
: None
For the II Party/ Management
Documents Marked :
On the Petitioner's side
Ex . No. Date
Description
Ex . W1 5-2-1998 Hon'ble Supreme Court declared AIR & Doordarshan as industry.
Ex . W2 24-4-1999 Promotional transfer order from DDK Chennai to Belgaum- challenged the transfer order in O.A. No. 1011/2000 .
Ex . W3 6-11-1998 (a) Mr. R. Iyyasamy submitted a letter to forgo the promotion.
(b) The management issued proposed relieving order and relieving dated fixed on 20-11-1998 .
Ex . W4 20-11-1998 The management confirmed relieving order and forwarded the representation for foregoing on the promotion to higher officials and they had mentioned in the relieving order that the posts are surplus .
10-2-1999.
Ex. W5
Another transfer order issued from DDK Chennai to R. Iyyasamy at LPT Renebennur in the same cadre .
Ex . W6 March 1999 Uthandavan challenged the order in W.P. No. 3512/99 and got interim relief payment of salary (pending).
Ex . W7 26-3-1999 Iyyasamy--G.S . representation to the management for same relief as in W.P. No. 3512/99 .
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2 , 2008/ श्रावण 11 , 1930
4343 Ex . No. Date Description
Ex . W8 21-4-1999 Mr. R. Iyyasamy submitted a representation to management for requesting him to be posted at DDK Chennai , whenever the vacancy arises.
Ex . W9 24-9-1999 Union declared Mr. R. Iyyasamy and President as protected workman.
Ex . W10 9-11-1999 Union submitted letter for
conciliation regarding salary 21-11-1998 onwards .
Ex . W11 12-5-2000 Reply by management that they would not appear before RLC .
Ex . W12 23-6-2000 Reply by management that they would not appear before RLC .
Ex . W13 4-7-2000 Regional Labour Commissioner notice to second party.
Ex . W14 August 2000 O.A. No. 1011 of 2000 before C.A.T. Madras filed by R. Iyyasamy.
Ex . W15 4-1-2001 Judgement pronounced in O.A. No. 1011 of2000 and quashed the transfer order dated 28-4-1998 & 10-2-1998 .
Ex . W16 5-1-2001 R. Iyyasamy joined at DDK , Chennai on basis of the CAT order.
Ex.W17 14-3-2001 Promotional order communicated at DDK , Chennai to LPT Renebennur .
Ex . W18 April 2001 W.P. No. 8502/2001 filed against order in O.A. No.1011 of 2000 .
Ex . W19 20-5-2001 Union submitted to management list of protected workmen.
Ex. W20 30-1-2002 Transfer order from DDK ,
Chennai to DDK , Gulburga (same cadre) .
Ex. W21 18-2-2002 Mr. R. Iyyasamy submitted a representation to cancel the transfer order .
Ex . W22 March 2002. W.P. No. 6961/2002 was filed by petitioner union .
Ex . W23 15-5-2002 Union submitted 3rd letter to the management regarding list of protected workmen.
Ex . W24 17-9-2002 Order of the High Court in W.P. No.8502 of 2001 against O.Α. No. 1011 of 2000 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008/SRAVANA 11 , 1930
4344
Description
New Delhi , the 11th July , 2008
Date
Ex . No.
Ex . W25 8-10-2002 Notice to management about typographical error in W.P. No. 8502 of2001 .
Ex . W26 10-10-2002 Relieved on the basis of wrongly typed order in W.P. No. 802 of 2001.
S.O. 2138.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 09/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court No. II , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indian Institute of Mass Communication and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 11-7-2008 .
Ex. W27 18-12-2002 Order of Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 884 of 2002 regarding payment of salary for the period 21-11-1998 to 4-1-2001 .
[No. L -42012/87 /2001 - IR (CM- II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
Ex. W28 20-1-2003 Notice before RLC . regarding payment of salary/ FOC .
Ex. W29 10-2-2003 Complaint to the conciliation officer. u/ s 33 (A) of I.D. Act is pending.
BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT - II , NEW DELHI
R.N. Rai , Presiding Officer
Ex . W30 17-3-2003 High Court clarified in Writ Petition No. 8502 of 2001 regarding typographical error.
I.D. No. 09/2002
IN THE MATTER OF :
Ex . W31 10-4-2003 Union submitted protected workmen List .
Ex . W32 16-7-2003 High Court dismissed W.P. No. 6961 of 2002 with liberty to approach the Labour Court .
Sh . Ram Karan , S/ o Sh . Surat Singh , R/o Vill & Post : Gaddikheri Tehsil & Distt . Rohtak - 124001 Versus Claimant Ex . W33 24-11-2003 Submissions of documents regarding union and protected workmen and to reinstate Mr. R. Iyyasamy, General Secretary of the first party.
The Chairman/Director , Institute of Mass Communication Aruna Asaf Ali Marg , New Delhi - 110067 Respondent
AWARD
Ex . W34 18-4-2004 Petitioner union submitted document regarding protected workmen.
TheMinistry of Labour by its letter No. L- 42012/ 87/2001 - IR ( CM - II ) Central Governmentdt. 30-1-2002 has referred the following point for adjudication:
Ex . W35 18-11-1998 Letter of management regarding formation of trade union .
The point runs as hereunder :
For the II Party/Management :-
Description
Ex . No. Date
-Nil-
नई दिल्ली, 11 जुलाई , 2008
"Whether the action of the management of Indian Institute of Mass Communication in terminating Sh . Ram Karan , Vill & Post Office Gaddikheri , Tehsil & Distt . , Rohtak, Haryana from services w.e.f. 3-6-1999 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief he is entitled to ?"
The case of the workman is that , the management appointed him as Carpenter on 27-6-1996 . This arrangement of the workman with the management continued till April , 1997. His services were confirmed on 29-4-1997 on monthly wages of Rs . 2500 in continuity ofhis above said appointment . The monthly wages were increased to Rs . 3000 w.e.f. 1-5-1998 .
का. आ. 2138.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंस्टीट्यूट आफ मास कम्युनिकेशन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या II, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 09/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
That the management was not providing facilities underthe labour law, so the workman made representation . The management being annoyed , terminated his services [सं. एल-42012/87/2001 - आई आर ( सी एम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी 4345
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 2, 2008/श्रावण 11 , 1930
[ भाग II- खंड 3 (ii ) ]
orally without paying any retrenchment compensation and one month's pay in lieu of notice . The termination of services of the workman is illegal and he is entitled to reinstatement with full back wages .
documents indicate that the workman was not engaged as casual labour or daily rated worker. His services were hired in view of the wood work ofthe management . There is no evidence that there is post of Carpenter in the management . The workman was paid out of the sanctioned amount for the Institute . The workman worked up to 31-8-1999 on consolidated pay of Rs . 3000 thereafter , his services were not extended.
The case of the management is that the Institute of Mass Communication is not an Industry as per the ID Act, 1947 hence the present proceedings are without jurisdiction and does not apply to the IIMC .
From perusal of the documents it transpires that the workman was engaged when there was wood work and prior sanction was obtained for his engagement . He was not engaged against any post or for the whole year buthis services were extended in view of the wood work of the management .
The further case of the management is that there is no job or post for Carpenter in the management . The workman was never appointed on temporary or permanent basis. As and when construction work was being taken by the IIMC resulting in wood work , contractual labour is hired to complete the job of wood work.
It is true that the workman has worked for three years continuously. His services have been extended from time to time and last he was engaged @ Rs . 2500 and subsequently @ Rs . 3000 .
The alleged claimant was hired on contractual basis to finish the job and after completion of the said job the alleged claimant went away as he was hired for that particular job . Almost in every office when work is required, Carpenter is taken for completion of wooden work and after completion of wooden work, his services are no longer required . The management was not bound to provide such legal facilities to such contractual worker.
Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that the judgment of the Constitution Bench ( 1978 ) 3 SCR 207 still holds the field so far as definition of 2 J of ID is concerned. The Hon'ble Apex Court in that judgment has laid down triple tests and in the light of these tests it is to be ascertained whether the respondent/ management is an Industry or not.
The workman applicant has filed rejoinder. In the rejoinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the claim statement. The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement.
Evidence of both the parties has been taken .
The management has filed written brief. The management did not turn up for argument .
Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that he worked continuously from 1996 to 1999 and his services were terminated without paying him retrenchment compensation and one month's pay in lieu of notice . He is entitled to reinstatement with full back wages .
Ithas been held in Bangalore Water Supply that in an Industry there should be systematic activity and it should be organized by cooperation between the employer and the employees and it should be for production and/or distribution of goods and service calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes . It has been held that absence of profit notice or gainful objective is irrelevant. The true focus is functional and the decisive test is the nature of the activity with special emphasis on the employer and employee relations . If an organization is not carrying on trade and business , it is not beyond the purview of industrial activities .
(1978 ) 3 SCR- Bangalore Water Supply case is a Constitution Bench judgment. It is still holding the field in the matter of adjudication of this point.
Itwas submitted from the side of the management that he was engaged from time to time after obtaining sanction of the competent authority for wood work . His services were no longer required when wood work was completed.
Ithas been held in this case that Section 2 (j ) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 which defines industry contains words of wide import as wide as the legislature could have possibly made them . The problem of what limitations could and should be reasonably read in interpreting the wide words used in Section 2 (j ) is far too policy oriented to be satisfactorily settled by judicial decisions . The Parliament must step in and legislate in a manner which will leave no doubt as to its intention . That alone can afford a satisfactory solution to the question which has agitated and perplexed the judiciary at all levels .
The workman has filed WW1 / 1 , photocopy of the proceedings of his engagement . He was initially engaged for two months @ Rs . 82.10 per day. Sanction was again accorded for hiring the carpenter and the workman was hired up to 26-8-1996. It was further extendedfrom 27-8-1996 to 27-10-1996. After 27-10-1996, it was again extended up to 18-4-1997 and thereafter from 19-4-1997 to 18-7-1997. The workman was engaged at monthly wages of Rs . 2500. Thereafter the services of the workman has thus , been continued from time to time after obtaining sanction of the competent authority.
In this judgment the Hon'ble Apex Court has laid down triple test to ascertain whether a particular unit or undertaking is an industry or not. It has been held in this case that where (i ) systematic activity , ( ii ) organized by The documents filed by the workman shows that this services came to end on 31-10-1998 .It was again extended from 1-11-1998 for three months . These 4346
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 2 , 2008 / SRAVAΝΑ 11 , 1930
cooperation between employer and employee ( the direct and substantial element is chimerical) ( iii ) for the production and/or distribution of goods and services calculatedto satisfy human wants and wishes ( not spiritual or religious , but inclusive of material things or services geared to celestial bliss e.g. making on a large scale prasad orfood).
(b) Absence of profit motive or gainful objective is. irrelevant be the venture in the public , joint, private or other sector .
(c) The true focus is'functional and the decisive test is the nature of the activity with special emphasis on the employer - employee relations .
(d) If the organization is a trade or business it does not cease to be one because of philanthropy animating the undertaking .
Although Section 2 (j ) uses words of the widest amplitude in its two limbs , their meaning cannot be magnified to over each itself.
The Hon'ble Apex Court has laid down further the dominant nature test. It has been held as follows :
"Where a complex of activities some of which qualify for exemption, others not involves employees on the total undertaking some of whom are not workmen as in the University of Delhi case or some departments are not productive of goods and services if isolated, even then the predominant nature of the services and the integrated nature ofthe departments as explained in the Corporation ofNagpur will be the true test . The whole undertaking will be industry although those who are not workmen by definition may not benefit by the status .
Notwithstanding the previous clauses , sovereign functions , strictly understood (alone) , qualify for exemption not the welfare activities of economic adventures undertaken by government or statutory bodies.
Even in departments discharging sovereign functions if there are units which are industries and they are substantially severable then they can be considered to come within Section 2 (j ) .
The respondent's unit is engaged not in a sovereign function . It has been held in the above case that even arsenal or artillery department is an industry . Industry is decided on the nature of work it is performing.
Fromperusal ofthe records it becomes quite evident thatthe respondent/ management is engaged in systematic human activities. The respondents are not discharging duties for gains but gainful objective is irrelevant in deciding whether an undertaking is an industry or not .
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] units which are Industries , the same can be severable and will come within the purview of Section 2 (j ) of the ID Act, 1947 .
In the instant case it is admitted that systematic activities are continued. It may not be for the gains . There is employer - employee relationship and the workman is a manual worker so he comes under the purview of Section 2(j ) of the ID Act , 1947. The management is an Industry in view of the Constitution Bench judgment .
It has been, held in (2007 ) 9 Supreme Court Cases 353 as under:
" Labour Law Industrial Disputes Act, 1947- S.25F-Relief to be given for violation of Grant of compensation instead of reinstatement with full back wages- When warranted-Workman appointed as daily wager , working for only a short period, raising industrial dispute almost six years afterdismissal , and there being question as to the whether his appointment had been made in terms of the statutory rules in the first place- Held , relief of reinstatement with full back wages would not be granted automatically only because it would be lawful to do so Several factors have to be considered , two of them being as to whether appointment in question had been made in terms of the statutory rules , and the delay in raising the industrial dispute-In present case , keeping in view the nature and period of services , and the delay in raising the industrial dispute , award of reinstatement with back wages substituted by compensation of Rs. 75,000 .
The workman has not established that he worked against the substantive vacant post . The work against which the workman worked is not a regular nature of work . The workman was engaged whenever there was requirement of wood work but hehas worked continuously for three years so he is entitled to compensation in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. He is entitled to a compensation of Rs . 50,000.
The reference is replied thus :
The action of the management of Indian Institute of Mass Communication in terminating Sh . Ram Karan, Vill . and Post Office Gaddikheri , Tehsil and Distt . Rohtak, Haryana from services w.e.f. 3-6-1999 is neither legal nor justified. The workman applicant is entitled to get compensation of Rs . 50,000 (Rs. Fifty Thousand only) in view of his continuous work for three years though on extension basis .
The award is given accordingly.
Date: 20-6-2008
It has been held in Bangalore Water Supply that departments discharging sovereign functions , if they are
Printed by the Manager, Govt . of India Press . Ring Road, Maya Puri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications . Delhi- 110054 , 2008
R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer