This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्रीसं. डी. एल. (एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003-05 भारत राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

नई दिल्ली , अगस्त 3 अगस्त 9 , 2008 , शणिकर / आवजा 12- श्रावण 18 , 1930

सं. 32]

No. 32]

NEW DELHI, AUGUST 3 AUGUST 9, 2008 , SATURDAY/SHINANA ED- SRAVANA 18, 1930

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II-खण्ड 3 -उप-खण्ड (ii)

PART II-Section 3-Sub- section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं StatutoryOrders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries ofthe Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

वित्त मंत्रालय

(राजस्वविभाग)

(सीमा एवं उत्पाद शुल्क केंद्रीय बोर्ड ) ( केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क के आयुक्त आर कार्यालय , पुणे -11 ) पुणे, 14 जुलाई, 2008

संख्या: 02/2008-सीमा शुल्क ( एन.टी. ) का. आ. 2139. सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम, 1962 की धारा 152 के खण्ड ( ए ) के अधीन भारत सरकार, वित्त मंत्रालय , राजस्व विभाग , नई दिल्ली द्वारा दिनांक 1-7-1994 को जारी अधिसूचना संख्या 33/94-सीमा शुल्क ( एन.टी. ) के अनुसरण में सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 की धारा 9 के अधीन प्रदत्त अधिकारों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैं, एतद्वारा महाराष्ट्र राज्य के निम्नलिखित स्थान अर्थात् गांव : डोंगरपाल , ताल्लुका : सावंतवाडी जिला , सिंधुदुर्ग को सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 52 ) की धारा 9 के अधीन शत- प्रतिशत निर्यात लक्ष्यी यूनिट स्थापन करने के लिए वेयर हाऊसिंग स्टेशन के रूप में घोषित कर रहा हूँ।

[फा. सं.: वि.जी.एन. (30)21/ई.ओ.

यू/तकनीकी/पुणे- II /2008 ]

बी. एस. वासुदेव , आयुक्त 2823 G1/ 2008

(4347)

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Revenue)

(CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND GUSTOMS) (OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE- II)

Pune, the 14th July, 2008 No.02/2008-CUS . (N.T. )

S.O. 2139. In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 9 of the Customs Act, 1962 asdelegated videNotification No. 33 /94-Cus . (N.T. ) dated 1-7-1994 issued by the Government of India , Ministry of Finance , Department of Revenue , New Delhi under clause ( a) of Section 152 of Customs Act, 1962, I, hereby declare the following place namely Village : Dongarpal , Tal : Sawantwadi Distt . Sindhudurg , in the state of Maharashtra as a Warehousing Station under Section 9 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) for the purpose of setting up of 100%ExportOrientedUnit.

[F. No. VGN (30)21 /EOU /Tech ./P: 11/2008 ] B. S. VASUDEV, Commissioner 4348

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

कार्यालय , मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त

नाशिक , 12 मई, 2008

का.आ. 2140.- आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 2गए के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 ( 23 ग ) ( VI ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैं , मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, नासिक एतद्वारा सेन्ट झेवियर्स शैक्षणिक संस्था, टाऊन सेंटर , सिडको , औरंगाबाद को निर्धारण वर्ष 2007-2008 से आगे की अवधि के लिए एक धार्मिक एवं धर्मादा संस्था के रूप में अनुमोदित करता हूं । 2. यह अनुमोदन निर्धारण वर्ष, 2007-2008 से वैध रहेगा बशर्ते कि:-

( i ) संस्था आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 2 गए के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 की उप - धारा ( 237 ) के खण्ड ( VI ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप हो एवं उनका अनुपालन करें

( ii ) आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार निर्धारिती अपने अधिकार क्षेत्र वाले आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष अपनी आय का रिटर्न नियमित रूप से दाखिल करें।

[सं. ना. मु.आ.आ/तक( 15/59 ) / 10 ( 23 ग) ( VI ) / 2008-09 ]

श्रीराम सिंह , मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Nasik , the 12th May, 2008

S.O. 2140.- In exercise of the powers conferred on me under section 10(23C)( vi ) of the Income Tax Act , 1961 read with Rule 2CA of the IT Rules , 1962 , I , Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik hereby approve St. Xaviers Education Trust , Town Centre , CIDCO , Aurangabad as a Public Religious and Charitable Trust for the period from A.Y. 2007-2008 onwards .

2. The approval shall be valid from A.Y. 2007-2008 providedthat:-

(i) the institution conforms to and complies with the provisions of clause ( vi ) of sub- section (23C) of Section 10 of the I.T. Act, 1961 read with rule 2CA ofthe I.T. Rules , 1962.

(ii) the assessee shall regularly file its return of income beforethe jurisdicational Income -tax authority in accorance with the provisions of the I.T. Act, 1961 .

[No.N/CCIT/Tech . ( 15/59)/ 10 (23C)(vi )/2008-09 ] SRIRAM SINGH , Chief Commissioner of Income Tax नाशिक , 27 मई , 2008

का.आ. 2141.- आयकर नियमावली , 1961 की धारा 10 के खण्ड (23 ) के उप- खण्ड ( VI ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैं मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, नाशिक एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित करता हूं कि नासिक माथाडी तथा अरक्षित रोजगार बोर्ड , नासिक (इसके बाद " बोर्ड " कहा गया ) की ओर से प्राप्त की गई कोई आय निम्नलिखित शर्तों के लिए ऐसे व्यक्ति की सकल आय में कराधेय आय के रूप में शामिल नहीं की जाएगी:-

(i ) बीर्ड अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है तथा उस मामले में जहां इसकी पंद्रह प्रतिशत से अधिक आय अप्रैल , 2002 के पहले दिन में या उसके पश्चात् आय एकत्र की गई है , इसकी आय के संचयन राशि के पन्द्रह दिन में या उसके पश्चात् आय एकत्र की गई है , इसकी आय के संचयन राशि के पन्द्रह प्रतिशत से अधिक होने की अवधि किसी भी स्थिति में पांच वर्ष से अधिक नहीं होनी चाहिए ;

(ii ) बोर्ड उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप - धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकोंसे भिन्न तरीकों से अपनी निधि ( जेवर-जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा ;

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगी , जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार बोर्ड के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;

( iv ) बोर्ड आय कर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगी;

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में बोर्ड अतिरिक्त राशियां और परिसमाप्तियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएगी ।

(vi ) बोर्ड अपने खातों की लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा लेखापरीक्षां करके धारा 288 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) के तहत निश्चित किए गए स्पष्टीकरण एवं आय के रिटर्न के साथ प्रस्तुत करें । ऐसी लेखापरीक्षा रिपोर्ट निर्धारित प्रारूप में लेखा परीक्षक से विधिवत हस्ताक्षरित एवं सत्यापित की जाए एवं निर्धारित किए गए ऐसे विवरणों को सम्मुख रखा जाए । 2. यह अधिसूचना केवल बोर्ड की ओर से आय के प्राप्तकर्ता पर ही लागू होगी न कि इस तरह के प्राप्तकर्ता द्वारा किसी प्राप्ति अथवा आय पर । बोर्ड की आय की कराधेयता अथवा अन्यथा पर , आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के उपबंधों के अनुसार पृथक रूप से विचार किया जाए । 3. यह अधिसूचना नि.व. 2007-08 से आगे के लिए लागू रहेगी ।

4. बाद में यदि यह पाया गया कि बोर्ड की गतिविधियां प्रमाणिक नहीं हैं अथवा उसकी गतिविधियां सभी या किसी एक उन शर्तों के अनुरूप संचालित नहीं की जा रही है जिनके अधीन उसे अधिसूचित किया गया था , तो उपरोक्त अधिसूचना को अधोहस्ताक्षरी द्वारा निरस्त किया जा सकता है ।

[सं. ना/मु.आ.आ./तक ( 5/3 )/10 ( 23 ग) ( VI ) 2008-09 ] श्रीराम सिंह, मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

4349

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

Nashik, the 27th May, 2008

any of the conditions subject to which it was notified.

[No.N/CCIT/Tech./(5/3 )/ 10(23C)(vi)/2008-09] SRIRAM SINGH, Chief Commissioner of Income Tax

नाशिक , 27 मई, 2008

S.O. 2141.-In exercise ofpowers conferred by the sub -clause ( vi) of the Clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 , I Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik hereby notifies that any income received by any person on behalf of Nashik Mathadi and Unprotected LabourBoard, Nashik (hereinafter the ' Board' ) shall not be included in the total income of such person subject to the following conditions , namely:--

का.आ. 2142,-आयकर नियमावली, 1961 के नियम 2गए के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 ( 23 ग ) ( V1 ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैं , मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, नासिक एत‌द्वारा सेन्ट लौन्स एज्युकेशन , द्वारा कैम्बरिज स्कूल, सुन्दरवाडी, झाल्टा सर्कल , जालना रोड , औरंगाबाद को निर्धारण वर्ष 2007-2008 की अवधि से आगे सार्वजनिक धर्मार्थ एवं धार्मिक संस्थाके लिए अनुमोदित करता हूं।

2. यह अनुमोदन निर्धारण वां, 2007-2008 से वैध रहेगा बशर्ते कि:-

(a) the Board will apply its income, or accumulate for application, wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established and in a case where more than fifteen per cent of its income is accumulated on or after the 1st dayofApril, 2002 the period of the accumulation of the amount exceeding fifteen per cent of its income shall in no case exceed five years;

( i ) संस्था आयकर नियमावली, 1962 यो नियम 2 गए के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 की उप- धारा (23 ग ) के खण्ड ( VI ) के प्रावधानों के अनुस्खा हो एवं उनका अनुपालन करें।

(ii) आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार निर्धारिती नियमित रूप से उसके अधिकारक्षेत्र के आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष अपनी आय का रिटर्न दाखिल करें।

(b) the Board will not invest or deposit its fund (other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furniture, etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above otherwise than in any one or more ofthe forms or modes specified in sub- section (5) ofSection 11;

[सं.भा./मु.आ.आ/तक( 13/59 )/10( 23ग ) (VI ) / 2008-09-646]

श्रीराम सिंह, मुख्य आंधकर आयुक्त

Nasik, the 27th May, 2008

(c) this notification will not apply in relation to any incomebeing profits and gains ofbusiness, unless thebusiness is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the Board and separate books of account are maintained in respect of such business;

: (d) the Board will regularly file its return of income beforethe Income tax authority in accordance with theprovisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 .

S.O. 2142. In exercise ofthe povers conferred on me under Section 10(23C) (vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 2CA of the IT Rules, 1962 , 1, Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik herby approve St. LawrenceEducation , C/o Cambridge Schod, Sunderwadi , Zalta Circle, Jalna Road, Aurangabad as a Public Religious and Charitable Trust for the period from A. 2007-2008 onwards.

(e) that in the event of dissolution of the Board, its surplus and the assets will be given to an organization with similar objectives;

2. The approval shall be valid from A.Y.2007-2008 providedthat:

(i) the institution conforms to and complie with the provisions ofclause (vi) of sub- section (23C) of Section 10 ofthe 1.T. Act, 1961 read with rule 2CA of the IT Rules , 1962.

(ii) the assessee shall regularly file its return of income before thejurisdictional Income-tax authority in acordance with the provisions of the 1.T. Act, 1961 .

(f) the Board will get its accounts audited by an accountant as defined in Explanation below sub- section (2) of Section 288 and furnish along with the return of Income. The report of such audit in the prescribed form duly signed and verified by such accountant and setting forth such particulars asmay be prescribed.

[No. N/CCIT/Tech.( 15/59) 10(23C)( vi )/2008-09-646] SRIRAM SINGH, Chief Commissioner ofIncomeTax

(केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )

2. This notification is applicable only to the recipients of income on behalf of the Board and not to any other receipt or income of such recipients. Taxability or otherwise ofthe income of the Board would be separately considered as per the Provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 .

नई दिल्ली, 1 अगस्त, 2008

3. This notification is applicable for A.ys. 2007-08 onwards.

4. This above notification is liable to be rescinded by the undersigned, if it is subsequently found that the activities of the Board are not genuine or iftheyare not carried out in accordance with all or

का. आ. 2143. सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग तथा ऽड़ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( i ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2007 4350

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

1962 (said Rules) with effect from 1-4-2007 in the category of' scientific research association ' subject to the following conditions , namely :---

सेसंगठन एम एसस्वामीनाथन रिसर्च फाउंडेशन , चेन्नई को निम्नलिखित शतों के अधीन " वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ " की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थात्: -

(i ) The sole objective of the approved ' scientific research association ' shall be to undertake scientific research .

(i ) अनुमोदित ' वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ' का एक मात्र उद्देश्य वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करना होगा;

( ii) The approved organization shall carry out the scientific research activity by itself.

(ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन स्व यं ही वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान क्रिया कलाप कीजारी रखेगा;

"

(iii ) The approved organization shall maintain books of accounts and get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section (2) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verifiedby such accountant to the Commissioner ofIncome-tax or the Director of Income -tax having jurisdiction over the case by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 139 of the said Act;

( iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन बही- खाता रखेगा तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत केरगा।

(iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा। रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा।

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above.

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन :-

3. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization :-

(a) fails to maintain books of accounts referred to in sub -paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or (क) पैराग्राफ । के उप - पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा वही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph (iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(ख) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(c) fails to furnish its statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research referred to in sub - paragraph ( iv) of paragraph 1 ; or

(ग) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एवं प्रयुक्तं राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा ; अथवा

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine ; or

(घ ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य कलाप करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य कलाप को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of section 35 of the said Act read with rules 5C and 5D of the said Rules .

(ङ ) हक्त नियमावली के नियम 5ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 कीउप- धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा।

[Notification No. 82 /2008 /F . No. 203/64/2007 /ITA - II ] RENU JAUHRI , Director ( ITA.II )

(वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 28 जुलाई , 2008

[ अधिसूचना सं. 82/2008/फा. सं. 203/64/2007 -आ.क.नि. II ] रेनूजौहरी , निदेशक ( अ.का.नि.- II ) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) NewDelhi , the Ist August , 2008

का. आ. 2144.-केंद्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम (4) के अनुसरण में , संलग्न अनुबंध में निम्नलिखित बैंकों/वित्तीय संस्थाओं के सूचीबद्ध शाखाओं/कार्यालयों को, जिनके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है।

S.O. 2143. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation , Channai has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of sub- section ( 1) ofSection 35 ofthe Income - tax Act, 1961 (said Act), read with rules 5C and 5D of the Income- tax Rules , 4351

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9, 2008/श्रावण 18 , 1930

[भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

क्रम बैंक/बीमा कंपनी का नाम सं.

शाखाओं/

कार्यालयों की

संख्या

10. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद भद्रचलम शाखा, खमंम जिला , भद्रचलम -507111 , खमंम जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

352

1. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

2. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर 19

11. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद भैंसा शाखा, गंज , मुधोल तालूका , भैंसा-504103 , अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

92

3. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला

52

4. सैण्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

14

5. सिंडिकेट बैंक

12. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद भीमारम शाखा , वया- मंचिर्याल , चिन्नूर तालुका, भीमारम-504204 , अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 6. यूनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 46

7. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 47

8. ओरियंटल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स 06

13. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद भूपालपल्ली शाखा , पलकाल मंडल, भूपालपल्ली-506169 , वरंगल जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

02

9. भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक

इण्डियन बैंक

10. 07

11. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 06

14. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद बुधवारपेट शाखा , गवनमेंट जूनियर कॉलेज , निर्मल , बुधवारपेट-504,106 , अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश पंजाब नैशनल बैंक

12. 53

20

13. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कम्पनी लि.

14. नेशनल इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लि. 02

15. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद. बुरगमपहाड़ शाखा ,6-59/1 , पोलीस स्टेशन के सामने , वुरगमपहाड़-507114 , खमंम जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

718

कुल

[फा. सं. 11016/4/2008/हिन्दी] रमेशबाबू अणियेरी , संयुक्त निदेशक ( राजभाषा )

16. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद सीसीआई टाउनशिप शाखा , अदिलाबाद , अदिलाबाद-504003, अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश स्टेट बैंक आफ हैदराबाद

17. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद वेरियाल शाखा , जनगांव , चेरियाल-506223 , वरंगल जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

1. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद एसीसी- मंचिर्याल शाखा, मंचिर्याल , ए.सी.सी. मंचिर्याल- 504208 , अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

18: स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद चिन्नूर शाखा , अदिलाबाद जिला , चिन्नूर -504201 , अदिलाबाद जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

2. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद अब्दुल्लापुर शाखा , बासर पोस्ट, अब्दुल्लापुर -504101 , अदिलाबाद जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

19. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद विट्याल ( अदिलाबाद ) शाखा , ग्राम पंचायत समिति बिल्डिग , चिट्याल -504306 , अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

3. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद अडाशाखा , अशिफाबाद मंडल , अडा-504293 , अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

20. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद चौरस्ता- हनमकोंडा शाखा, जीवनलाल कॉम्लेक्स , हनमकोंडा-506011 , वरंगलं जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश 4. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद अदिलाबाद मुख्य शाखा , मेइन 'रोड , अदिलाबाद -504001 , अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

21. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद चॅर्चरोड-खमंम शाखा , 7-2-286 , विजया कॉम्पलेक्स, खमंम-507003 , खमंम जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 5. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद अशोकनगर शाखा , 6-3-317 , पेद्दपल्ली चौरस्ता, करीमनगर-505001 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

6. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

22. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद कलेक्टरेट कॉप्लेक्स- अदिलाबाद शाखा, अदिलाबाद , अदिलाबाद -504002, अदिलाबाद जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश अशिफाबाद शाखा , अशिफाबाद , अशिफाबाद -504293 अदिलाबाद जिला , आन्ध्र प्रदेश

7. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

23. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद कलेक्टरेट कांप्लेक्स करीमनगर शाखा , करीमनगर , करीमनगर -505001 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

24. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

हेवी वाटर प्लेंट- अश्वापुरम शाखा, अश्वापुरम पोस्ट, मित्तागूडेम , अश्वापुरम -507116 , खामंम जिला आंध्र प्रदेश

8. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

कोर्ट कॉप्लेक्स- करीमनगर शाखा , कोर्ट कॉप्लेक्स , जगित्याल रोड , कोर्ट कॉप्लेक्स करीमनगर-505001 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

अशरावपेट शस्खा, 10-91 , पोलीस स्टेशन के नजदीक अशरावपेट-507301 , खमंम जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

9. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

25. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद धम्मापेट शाखा 3-14/ 1 , एमआरओ कार्यालय के सामने , सत्तुपल्ली-507306 , खमंम जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश वेल्लमपल्ली शाखा , वेल्लमपल्ली बाजार , वेल्लमपल्ली-504251 , अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 4352

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18, 1930

26.: स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

| डोर्नकल शाखा , वरंगल जिला , डोर्नकल -506381 , वरंगल जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

27. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

दुब्बापल्ली ( चेलपुर ) शाखा , कटीपीपी कैम्पस , भूपालपल्ली रोड , हुब्बापल्ली ( चेलपुर) -506169 , वरंगल जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

28. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

एदूरनगरम शाखा , एदूरनगरम-506165 , वरंगल जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

29. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

फर्टिलाइजर सिटी ( गोदाख ) शाखा , पेद्रपल्ली , गोदावरीखनी-505210 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 30. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

गंभीररावपेट शाखा, वरंगल जिला, गंभीररावपेट-505304, करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

31. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

गांधी चौक शाखा, खमंम , खमंम -507003 , खमंम जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

32. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

गंगाधरी शाखा , करीमनगर जिला , गंगाधरा-505445, करीमनगर जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

33. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

गरिमेल्ला शाखा मंचिर्याल मंडल , मरिमेल्ला-504208 , अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

34. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

एरिया अस्पताल-गोदावरीखनी शाखा , राम मंदिर रोड, गोदावरीखनी-505209 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 35. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

सेटनरी कॉलोनी-गोदावरीखनी शाखा , एससीसीएल सेक्टर-4, पन्नूर विलेज-505212 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

36. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

वितलनगर -गोदावरीखनी शाखा , एससीसीएस सैक्टर-2 , इंदिरा कॉलोनी , गोदावरीखनी-505214 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

37. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

घनपुर शाखा , वरंगल जिला, घनपुर-506143 , वरंगल जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

38. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

गोदावरीखनी ( एससीएल ) शाखा , बंग्ला एरिया , राजीव रहदारी, गोदावरीखनी ( एससीएल ) -505209 , करीमनगर जिला, आध्र प्रदेश

39. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

गोलेटी शाखा , रेबन्न मंडल , गोलेटी-504292 , अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

40. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , गुंजपडुगू शाखा , वया- मंथनी/मीदावरीखनी , गुंजपडुगू-505184 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

41. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

हनुमकोड़ा मुख्य शाखा, नक्कलगुट्टा , हनुमकोंडा-506002, वरंगल जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii )] 42. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

हुजूराबाद शाखा , करीमनगर जिाला , हुजूराबाद-505468 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

43. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

इच्छोडा शाखा, बोत तालुका, इच्छोडा-504307 , अदिलाबाद जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

44. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद जगित्याल शाखा , करीमनगर जिला , जगित्याल -505327 , करीमनगर जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

45. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद जयनूर शाखा , जयनूर , जयनूर -504313 , अदिलाबाद जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

46. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद जल्लारम शाखा , 8 , इनक्लाइन कॉलोनी शापिंग कॉप्लेक्स, जल्लारम -505211 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 47. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

जम्मिकुंटा शाखा, हुजूराबाद तालुका, जम्मिकुंटा -505122 , करीमनगर जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

48. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

जनकापुर शाखा , अशिफाबाद मंडल , जनकापुर-504293 , अदिलाबाद जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

49. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद जनगांव शाखा, बैंक रोड, जनगांव 506167 , वरंगलं जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

50. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद जन्नारम शाखा , जन्नारम पोस्ट , जन्नारम मंडल , जन्नारम्र-504205 , अदिलाबाद जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश 51. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद जिल्लेला शाखा, 8-3-86, ओल्ड बस स्टैंड के नजदीक सिरसिल्ला-505301 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 52. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद ज्योति नगर शाखा , करीमनगर जिला , ज्योतिनगर -501215 , करीम नगर जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

53. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद चिनमया विद्यालया शाखा , एफसीआई चौरस्ता, ज्योतीनगर , चिनमया विद्यालय-505215 , करीमनगर जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश 54. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

कलवाश्रीरामपुर शाखा, करीमनगर जिला , कलवाश्री- रामपुर-505153 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 55. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद कल्लूर शाखा , 3-44-2, मेइन रोड , कल्लूर -507209 , खमंम जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

56. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद कल्यानिखनी शाखा , 64-219 , अशोका कॉप्लेक्स , कल्यानिखनी-504231 , अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 57. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद कमानपुर शाखा, पेद्दपल्ली तालूका , कमानपुर-505188 , करीमनगर जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

58. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद कामेपल्ली (उतुकूर ) शाखा, तल्लागूडेम , कारेपल्ली मंडल , कामेपल्ली ( उतुकूर ) -507122 , खमंम जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

59. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

कनुकुला शाका , सुल्तानाबाद मंडल , कनुकुला-505185, करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

60. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

कारेपल्ली शाखा, एल्लंदु तालुका, कारेपल्ली-507122, खमंभ जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

61. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

करीमनगर मुख्य शाखा , 4-1-289 , स्टेट बैंक रोड, करीमनगर-505001 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 62. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

रामपुर- करीमनगर शाखा , 8-6-48, कोटी रामपुर, करीमनगर-505001 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 63. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

काशीबुग्गा शाखा, 11-23-284, पहली मंजिल, आर. एम. कॉप्लेक्स , काशीबुग्गा-506002 , वरंगल जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश 64. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

काजीपेट शाखा , 1-3-111 /115 , पहली मंजिल मेईन रोड , काजीपेट-506003 , वरंगल जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश .

65. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, केसमुद्रम शाखा , वंरंगल जिला , केसमुद्रम-506112, वरंगमल जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश 66. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

खम्मम मुख्य शाखा, जुबिलीपुरा , खम्मम-507003, सागंम जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

67. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

वैयक्तिक एवं वाणिज्यिक खमंम शाखा, संक्षेम भवन (डी आर डी ए ) , बुरहनपुरम वैयक्ति एवं वाणिज्यिक-खमंम-507001 , खर्मम जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 68. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद.

खानापुर शाखा , खानापुर मंडल , खानापुर-504203 , अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

69. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

कोरटला शाखा , करीमनगर जिला , कोरटला-505326, करीमनगर जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

70. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

कोत्तगूडेम शाखा, एम जी रोड, कोत्तगूडेम-507101 , खमंम जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

71. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

कुसुमांची ( जीलाचेरुठ ) शाखा , 2-88 , कुसुमांची , कुसुमांची-507170 खर्मम जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 72. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

लक्ष्मीनगर- जलगांव शाखा , 33-59 , स्वतंत्रा चौक, लक्ष्मीनगर-जनगांव-505209 , करीमनगर जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश 73. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

लक्ष्मीनगरम शाखा, दम्मागूडा मंडल , लक्ष्मीनगरम-507137, खमंम जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 74. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

लिंगापूर शाखा , कद्दम मंडल , खानापुर तालुका, लिंगापुर-504202 , अदिलाबाद जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश 75. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

लक्षिटपेट शाखा , लक्षिटपेट तालुका, लक्षिटपेट-504215, अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

4353

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त , 2008/ आश्रावण 18 , 1930

76. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मधिस शाखा , खमंम जिला, मधिरा-507203 , खमंमजिला , आआंध्र प्रदेश

77. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मंत्रिर्याल शाखा , गंगारेड्‌डी रोड , मंखिर्याल-504208, अदिलाबाद जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

78. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मंदमरी शाखा , मंदमरी शाखा (टांपाल ) , मंदमर्स-504231, अदिलाबाद विश्म, आंध्र प्रदेश

79. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मंकम्मतोटा शाखा , सं. 7-1-256, मंकम्मतोटा-505002, करीमनगर जिला , आध्र प्रदेश

80. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मंधनी ( कृविशा ) शाखा, मंधनी, मंथनी-505184, करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

81. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मणुगूरू शाखा , खमंम जिला , मधुयूरु-507117 , खमंम जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

82. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मेटपल्ली शाखा , करीमनगर जिला, मेटपल्ली -505325, करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

83. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मेटपल्ली ( कृविशा ) शाक्षा, करीमनगर जिला , मेटपल्ली-505225 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 84. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मुधोल शाखा, मुधोल तालुका, मुझेल 504102, अदिलाबाद जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

85. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मुलकनूर शाखा, भीमदेवरपरली मंडल, मुलकनूर-505471, करीमनगर जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

86. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मुत्तारम शाखा , मुत्तारम पोस्ट/मंडल , मुत्तारम-505153, करीमनगर जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

87. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

नरमूर शाखा , नस्नूर , नरनूर-504329 , अदिलाबाद जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

88. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

नरसमपेटशाखा, वरंगल जिला, नरसमपेट-506132, वरंगल जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

89. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

नरसापुर ( अदिलाबाद जि ) , शाखा निर्मल तालुका, नरसापूर (जि)-504104 , अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 90. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

नेलकोंडपल्ली शाखा, ट्रंक रोड, नेलकोंडपल्ली-507160, खमंभ जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

91. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

निर्मल शाखा , होटल तिरुमला प्रिमिसेस , निर्मल-504106, अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

92. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

इनआई टी, वरंगल शाखा, 'वरंगल , वरंगल-506004 , वरंगल जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश 4354

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9, 2008/ SRAVANA 18, 1930

93. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

वै एवं से वै- नसपुर शाखा , क्यू/5 , सी79 , एवं 80 , एससीसीएचसी , नसपुर -504303 , अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

94. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

परकाल शाखा, बैंक स्ट्रीट , परकाल , परकाल-506164, वरंगल जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

95. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

पेद वंगरा शाखा , कोडकंड्ला मंडल , पेद वंगरा -506317 , वरंगल जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

96. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

पेददपल्ली, कृविशा शाखा , भूमनगर , पेददपल्ली -505172, करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

97. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

पेगडालपल्ली शाखा , वया-गोपालपल्ली , मल्लियाल ता पेगडालपल्ली -505532 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 98. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

पेम्बी शाखा , खनापुर तालूका , पेम्बी-504203 , अदिलावाद जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

99. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

पिओ आईटीडीए - भद्राचलम शाखा , आईटीडीए कॉप्लेक्स, : भद्राचलम , पिओ आईटीडीए - भद्राचलम-507111 , खमंम जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

100. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

पोस्टाफीस एरिया शाखा , 9-4-142 , पकाशम स्टेडीयम के सामने, कोव्वागूडेम -507101 , खमंम जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 101. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

रायपर्ती शाखा, रायपर्ती पोस्ट/मंडल , रायपर्ती-506314 ,. | वरंगल जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

102. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

रामगुडम शाखा , करीमनगर जिला, रामगुडम-505208 , करीमनगर जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

103.

रामकृष्णापुरम शाखा , वी ज़ोन सेंटर , राजीव चौक ,.. रामकृष्णापुरम-504301 , अदिलाबाद जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश .. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

104

रेखापल्ली शाखा वी आर पुरम मंडल , रेखापल्ली-507135, खमंम जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

105.. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

रोटरी मगर-खमंम शाखा , वार्ड सं. 7 , डांर सं 5-1-19/1 , खमंम 507002 खमंम जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

106. , स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

। रुद्रमष्बूर शाखा क्यारटर सं बी. चुम्मारी सं. 1 , रुद्ररामपुर-507118 , खमंम जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 107. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

लमउ शाखा- मंचिर्याल शाखा , 8-401 , मेइन रोड , मंचियर्याल-504208 , अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 108. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

सारंगपुर ( अदिलाबाद जि ) शाखा अदिलाबाद जिला, सारंगपुर -504113 , अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

1

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 109. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

सत्तूपल्ली शाखा , सत्तूपल्ली-507303 , खमंम जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

110. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद सत्तूपल्ली ( कृविशा ) शाखा खामंम जिला , सव्तुपल्ली-507303 . खमंम जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश 111. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

सत्यनारायणपुरम शाखा , वॉगूर तालुका , सत्यनारायणपुरम -507140 , खमंम जिला, आध्र प्रदेश 112. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

सेवाशाखा-करीमनगर शाखा 3-5-20 , डॉक्टरस स्ट्रीट सेवा शाखा-करीमनगर -505001 , करीमनगर जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश 113. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

सेवा शाखा खंभम शाखा , जुबिलीपुरा ट्रंक रोड , खमंम -507001 , खमंम जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 114. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद सेवा शाखा वरंगल शाखा , जेपीएन रोड , वरंगल , वरंगल-506001 , वरंगल जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

115. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

एसआईआईएल- पोलोंचा शाखा , सिल काँप्लेक्स, पालोंचा-507154 , खमंम जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

116. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

सिरसिल्ला शाखा , करीमनगर जिला , सिरसिल्ला-505301 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

117. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

सिरिपुरम - खमंम शाखा,1-854 , ओवर ब्रिज के ऊपर , वैरा रोड, मधिरा -507203 , खमंम जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 118. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

सिरिपुर कागजनगर शाखा , सिरिपुर तालुका , सिरिपुर कागजनगर-504296 , अदिलाबाद जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश 119. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद लम उ शाखा-खमंम शाखा सं. 11-2-16 से 19 , वैरा रोड, खमंम-507001 , खमंम जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 120. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

ल म उ शाखा वरंगल शाखा , सं. 16-10-518/ 1 , अंडल ब्रिड्जिरोड, वरंगल -506002 , वारंगल जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 121. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

श्रीरामपुर शाखा मेईन रोड, श्रीरामपुर , श्रीरामपुर-504208 , अदिलाबाद जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

122. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद सुदिमेल्ला शाखा यल्लंदु , सुदिमेल्ला-507123 , अदिलाबाद जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

123. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

सुल्तानाबाद शाखा , मेइन रोड , पेद्दपल्ली ता , सुल्तानाबाद -505185 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 124. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद तल्लाडा शाखा, सं. 7-295 , तल्लाडा-507167 , खमंम जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

125. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

तोरुर शाखा वरंगल जिला, तोर्सर-506163 , वरंगल जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 4355

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9, 2008/श्रावण 18 , 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

126. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद , विम्मापुर शाखा एलएमडी कॉलोनी , तिम्मापुर-505527 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 127. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

ट्रेजरी शाखा-खमंम शाखा , कलेक्टरेट कॉप्लेक्स, खमंम-507002 , खमंम जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

128. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

उटनूर शाखा , वया- लक्षिटपेट , उटनूर तालुका, उंटनूर -504311 , अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 129. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

उटनूर शाखा , मोनाकौंडूर मंडल , उटनूर-505505 , करीमनगर जिला, आध्र प्रदेश

130. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

वीएम बंजार शाखा , पेनुबल्ली पोस्ट, वी एम बंजार-507302, खमंम जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

131. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

वाविलालपल्ली- करीमनगर शाखा , 3-7-324, एपीएसईवी रेस्ट हॉउस, वाविलालपल्ली -करीमनगर-505001 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

132. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

वेलगटूर शाखा , मंडल बेलगटूर , वेलगटूर -505526, करीमनगर जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

133. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

वेमुलावाडा शाखा , करीमनगर, जिला, वेमुलावाडा-505302, करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

134. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

वेंकटापुरम शाखा , खमंम जिला , वेंकटापुरम -507136, खमंम जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

135. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

विलास सागर शाखा , विलास सागर ( पोस्ट) , बोईनपल्ली ता. विलास सागर-505524 , करीमनगर जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 136. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

वांकिडी शाखा अदिलाबाद जिला , वांकिडी-504295, अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

137. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

वरंगल मुख्य शाखा , जेपीएन रोड , वरंगल-506002, वरंगल जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

138. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

वरदन्नपेट शाखा , वरंगल जिला , वरदन्नपेट-506313 , वरंगल जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

139. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

वैरा शाखा , मेईन रोड, वैरा-507165 , खमंभ जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश 140. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

यल्लदू शाखा खमंम जिला, यल्लदू-507123 , खमंम जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

2823 G1/08-2

141. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ़ हैदराबाद

परंमपेट शाखा,, तालुका चिम्नूर मंडल , यरंम्पेट+507126, खमंम जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश

142. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

जिल्लापरिषद्-खमंम शाखा , वेरा रोड, खमंम -507002, खमंम जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

143. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

करीमनगर क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय शाखा , 4-1-289 , स्टेट बैंक रोड, करीमनगर-505001 , करीम नगर जिला, आंध्र प्रदेश 144. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मंचिर्याल क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय शाखा , गंगारेड्डी रोड , मंचिर्याल-504208 , अदिलाबाद जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश 145. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

काचिनपल्ली शाखा , गुंडाला मंडल , काचिनपल्ली-0 , खमंम जिला , आंध्र प्रदेश

146. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

आदिनाथ कमर्शियल कॉम्प्लेक्स , शाप नं. 1 , 2 पुणे सातारा रोड, बिब्बेवाडी, पुणे -411037

147. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

ए-64, गोकुलधाम, गोरेगांव , ( प ) , मुंबई-400063 148. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

प्रणाम को-ऑपरेटिव हाउसिंग , सोसायटी , चीकूवाडी, बोरिवली (प ) , मुंबई -400092

149. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

पावरग्रिड कैम्पस , सम्प्रिति नगरं , नारी रिंग रोड , नागपुर-440026

150. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैद्रराबाद

खारघर शाखा , एकमा एवेन्यु, भूमितल, प्लाट नं. सी-94, सेक्टर-12 , गोखले हाई स्कूल के पीछे , खारघर , नवीमुंबई-410210

151. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

882, भूतल , ईस्ट पार्क रोड , करोल बाग , नई दिल्ली , पिनकोड-110005

152. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

जे-13/4 , पटेल मार्केट , राजौरी गार्डन , नई दिल्ली, पिनकोड -110027

153. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

जी ए 11 , रहेजो स्क्वायर, आई एम टी मानेसर , जिला गुड़गांव, हरियाणा , पिन कोड-120050

154. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

कृष्णा टावर, सेक्टर -12 , द्वारका , नई दिल्ली , पिनकोड-110075

155. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

पी एण्ड एस बी शाखा , के जी मार्ग, नई दिल्ली, पिनकोड-110011

156. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

लखनऊ.शाखा, सप्नु मार्ग , 6 - बी एस ए एस हाउस हजरत गंज , लखनऊ , पिन कोड-226001 4356

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST9 , 2008/SRAVANA 18 , 1930

औरंगाबाद आंधल के नियंत्रणाधीन ऐसी शाखाएं , जो राजभाषा नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 ( 4 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित की जानी हैं :

1517. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद सेवा शाखा , औरंगाबाद , पिन-431001

158. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद औसा रोड , शाखा लातूर , पिन -413351

159. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद एस. आर. टी. मेडिकल कॉलेज शाखा , अम्बाजोगाई , पिन-413517

160. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद येतला शाखा , नांदेड़ जिला, महाराष्ट्र

161. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद वालसावंगी शाखा , जालना जिला , पिन-431132 , महाराष्ट्र 162. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद ए डी बी मेडक, मेडक, आंध्र प्रदेश -502110 168. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद ए पी एच बी कुकटपल्ली , रंगारेड्‌डी , आंध्र प्रदेश-500872 164. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद बुद्धेल , रंगारेड्डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -500030

165. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद वेंगसूर , अल्लेप्पी, केरल-689121

166. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद चेटपुट, चेन्नई , तमिलनाडु-600031

167. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद धारूर रंगारेड्डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -501121

168. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद एयर कार्गो , हैदराबाद , आंध्र प्रदेश-500016

169. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद अरूटला, रंगारेड्डी, आंध्र प्रदेश-501508

170. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद सी है सी चेन्नई , चेन्नई , तमिलनाडु -600001 171. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद चेंगुगल , रंगारेड्डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -501501

172. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद चेवेक्ला, रंगारेड्‌डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -501503

173. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद. दोमा, रंगारेड्‌डी , आंध्र प्रदेश-501502

174. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद अलकापुरी , रंगारेड्‌डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -500035

175. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद बशीराबाद, रंगारेड्‌डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -501143

176. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

सीएसी-(सिकंदराबाद ) , हैदराबाद , आंध्र प्रदेश-500003 171. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद : चेन्नई- मुख्य , चेन्नई, तमिलनाडु -600001

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 178. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद कोयंबटूर , कोयंबटूर, तमिलनाडु -640018

179. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद दुब्बक, मेडक , आंध्र प्रदेश -502208

180. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद आलूर , रंगारेड्डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -501503

181. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद बेगमपेट, रंगारेड्डी , आध्र प्रदेश -500016

182. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद कालीकट , कालीकट , केरल-673004

183. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद चेन्नई - हजार लाइट्स , चेन्नई, तमिलनाडु -600014 184. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद कमर्शियल , हैदराबाद , आंध्र प्रदेश -500003

185. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद एहुमैलराम , मेडक, आंध्र प्रदेश-502205

186. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद गजवेल , मेडक , आंध्र प्रदेश -502278

187. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद हटनूर , मेडक, आंध्र प्रदेश -502296

188. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद आईसीएसए - एग्मोर , चेन्नई, तमिलनाडु-600008 189. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद जे एन टी यूकैम्पस , रंगारेड्डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -500072 190. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद करनकोट- सी सी आई , रंगारेड्डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -501158 191. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद कोवैपुदुर , कोयंबटूर , तमिलनाडु-641042

192. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद गंदेड , रंगारेड्डी, आंध्र प्रदेश-509341

193. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद हिम्मतनगर , हैदराबाद , आंध्र प्रदेश-500264 194. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद आईडीपीएल कॉलोनी , हैदराबाद , आंध्र प्रदेश -500037 195. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद जोगिपेट, मेडक, आंध्र प्रदेश -502270

196. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद कीसरा , रंगारेड्डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -501301

197. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद J कोयम्बेडु , चेन्नई , तमिलनाडु -600107

198. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद जनरल बाजार , हैदराबाद , आंध्र प्रदेश-500003 199. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद आई.ई. मड्चल , रंगारेड्डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -501401 200. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद इंदिरागनर , चेन्नई , तमिलनाडु -600020

201. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद ककतीयनगर , हैदराबाद , आंध्र प्रदेश -500008 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

202. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

काडकंला, मेडक, आंध्र प्रदेश-502312- 203. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

कुलक्चेर्ला, रंगारेड्‌डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -509335 204. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

घटकेसर , रंगारेड्‌डी, आंध्र प्रदेश-501301 205. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

इब्राहिमपटनम, रंगारेड्डी, आंध्र प्रदेश-501506 206. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

इसाइलखानपेट, मेहक , आंध्र प्रदेश-502296 207. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

कंडूकुर, रंगारेड्‌डी, आंध्र प्रदेश-509551 208. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

कोहिर, मेडक, आंध्र प्रदेश-502210 209. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

कुनैगुडा, रंगारेड्‌डी, आंध्रप्रदेश-506062 210. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

एम.सी. कोयम्बहु , चेन्नई, तमिलनाडु-600092 211. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मर्पल्ल्कलन, रंगारेड्‌डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -501202 212. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मोइनाबाद , रंगारेड्‌डी , आंध्र प्रदेश-501518 213. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मैलारंगड्‌डा, हैदराबाद , आंध्र प्रदेश-500025 214. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

न्यूभोइमुडा, हैदराबाद , आंध्र प्रदेश-500003 215. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

पी. एन. पुदुर , कोयंबटूर, तमिलनाडु-641041 216. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मदुरै , मदुरै, तमिलनाडु-625001

217. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मेडक मुख्य, मेडक , आंध्र प्रदेश-502110 218. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मौला-अली, रंगारेड्‌डी, आंध्र प्रदेश-500040 219. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

नागसमुंदर , रंगारेड्‌डी, आंध्र प्रदेश-501107 220. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

एनआईआरडी, रंगारेड्‌डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -500030 221. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

परगी ए डी बी, रंगारेड्‌डी, आंध्र प्रदेश-501501 222. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद महेश्वरम , रंगारेड्डी, आंध्र प्रदेश-509359 223. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मेडचल मुख्य, रंगारेड्‌डी, आंध्र प्रदेश-501401 224. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मोउंट रोड, चेन्नई , तमिलनाडु-600035- 225. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

नारायणखेड, मेडक, आंध्र प्रदेश -502286

4357

भारत का रामपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930 :

226. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

निज़मपेट, रंगारेड्डी, आंध्र प्रदेश-500072

227. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

परगी मुख्य, रंगारेड्‌डी, आंध्र प्रदेश-501501

228. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मलकापुर, रंगारेड्‌डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -501157

229. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद मिमिषेट , रंगारेड्‌डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -501509

230. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद एम पी एस एफ- अं. का. हैदराबाद , आंध्र प्रदेश-500003 231. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद नरसापुर, मेहक, आंध्र प्रदेश-502313

232. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

ओल्डबोइनवल्ली , संगारेड्‌डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -500011 233. स्टेट बैंक, ऑफ हैदराबाद पटलूर रंगारेड्‌डी, आंध्र प्रदेश-501202

234. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद पोरुर, थिसवल्ल, तमिलनाडु-600116

235. स्टेंट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद रायैदुर्ग , रंगारेड्‌डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -500008

236. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

आरएएसईसीसी, चैन्नई, तमिलनाडु-600035 237. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद सरदारनगर , रंगारेड्‌डी , आंध्र प्रदेश-509222

238. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद शंकरम्पेट, मेडक , आंध प्रदेश-502271

239. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद एसएमई-सी सी, सिकंदराबाद, हैदराबाद, आंध्र प्रदेश -500003 240. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

प्रशांतनगर, रंगारेड्‌डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -500040

241. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

राजेन्द्र नगर , रंगारेड्डी, आंध्र प्रदेश-500030

242. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ. हैदराबाद सदाशिवपेट, मेडक, आंध्र प्रदेश-502291

243. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

सरूरनगर, संगारे , आंध्र प्रदेशा-300060

244. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद शंकरपल्ली, रंगारेड्डी, आंध्र प्रदेश

245. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदसबाद सोलुर बेल्लौर, आंध्र प्रदेश-635814

246. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद पुदुर, रंगारेड्डी , आंध्र प्रदेश-501101

247. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

समंतपुर, संगारेड्‌डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -500013

248. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

सेलम , सालेम, तमिलनाड-636001

249. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

सर्विस शाखा, चैन्नई, तमिलनाडु-600014 4358

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 /SRAVANA 18 , 1930

250. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

शिवाम्पल्ली , रंगारेड्‌डी , आंध्रप्रदेश-500252 251. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

एसएसआई- चेलंपल्ली , रंगारेड्‌डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -500051 252. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

आर.सी. पुराम , मेडक, आंध्र प्रदेश-500032 253. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

रामायमपेट, मेडक , आंध्र प्रदेश-502101

254. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

सांगारेड्डी, मेडक , आंध्र प्रदेश -502001

255. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

शाबाद , रंगारेड्‌डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -509217

256. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

सिद्धिपेट, मेडक, आंध्र प्रदेश -502103

257. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

टी, नगर , चैन्नई, तमिलनाडु -600017

258. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

ताडुर मुख्य , रंगारेड्‌डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -501141 259. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

उप्पल , रंगारेड्‌डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -500039

260. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

वेन्नाला , एर्नाकुलम , केरल-682025

261. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

याचारम , रंगारेड्डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -501509

262. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

अमीरपेट, रंगारेड्डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -509325 263. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

बौरमपेट, रंगारेड्डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -500043 264. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

टी एफ सी पी सी, हैदराबाद , आंध्र प्रदेश -500001 265. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

वाल्मीकिनगर , चैन्नई, तमिलनाडु-600041 266. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

विकराबाद , रंगारेड्डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -501101 267. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

यलाल , रंगारेड्डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -501144

268. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद चेण्यिाल, रंगारेड्‌डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -501301 269. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

सीपीसीसी-अं. का., हैदराबाद , आंध्र प्रदेश-500003 270. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

तुमकुटा, रंगारेड्डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -500014 271. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

वनस्थलिपुरम , रंगारेड्डी, आंध्र प्रदेश --500661 272. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

वेस्टमारेडपल्ली , हैदराबाद , आंध्र प्रदेश -500026 273. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

जहीरबाद , मेडक , आंध्र प्रदेश-502220

[PART II -SEC. 3( ii) ] हब्सिगुडा, हैदराबाद, आंध्र प्रदेश -500078 274. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

275. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद इक्रिसैट, मेडक, आंध्र प्रदेश-502319

276. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद तिरुवल्ला , पतनम्थित्त , केरल-689107

277. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद वेलाचेरी , चैन्नई , तमिलनाडु-600042

278. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद वेस्टताम्बरम, चैन्नई, तमिलनाडु-600045

279. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद कंकल, रंगारेड्डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -501509

280. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद कोंगरकलन , रंगारेड्‌डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -501510 281. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद एल. बी. नगर , रंगारेड्डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -500963 282. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

चैतन्यपुरी , रंगारेड्डी, आंध्र प्रदेश -500060

283. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद नवाबपेट , रंगारेड्डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -501111

284. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

ओएसएफ , चेन्नई , चेन्नई , तमिलनाडु -600001 285. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद पॉण्डीचेरी , पॉण्डीचेरी

286. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद तिरुवनंतपुरम , तिरुवनंतपुरम , केरल-695023 287. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद एर्नाकुलम , एर्नाकुलम , तमिलनाडु-682035

288. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद आर. पी. रोड , हैदराबाद , आंध्र प्रदेश -500003 289. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद रंगमपेट, मेडक, आंध्र प्रदेश-502381

290. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, सार्क , अं. का. , हैदराबाद, आंध्र प्रदेश -500001 291. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

शमशाबाद , एस एस आई , रंगारेड्डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -500218 292. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद जिल्लेल्लगुडा, रंगारेड्डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -500079 293. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद वेन्नेचेद, रंगारेड्डो, आंध्र प्रदेश-509339

294. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद, वेस्ट-मल्काजगिरि , रंगारेड्डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -500047 295. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद तांदूर ए डी बी , रंगारेड्डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -501141 296. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद मरिकल , रंगारेड्डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -509340

297. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

मोहम्मदाबाद , रंगारेड्डी , आंध्र प्रदेश -501225 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

298. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद मैलापुर, चेन्नई, तमिलनाडु-600004

299. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद सिर्गापुर, मेडक , आंध्र प्रदेश-502207

विशाखापट्टणम , अंधल

क्षेत्र-1

300. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद एम.वी. पालेम शाखा , विशाखापट्टणम जिला , पिन कोड-530017 , आंध्र प्रदेश

301. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

चूचुकोंडा शाखा , विशाखापट्टणम जिला , पिनकोड-531055 , आंध्र प्रदेश

302. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

आलमंदा शाखा , विशाखाप‌ट्टणम जिला , पिनकोड-531030 , आंध्र प्रदेश

303. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

एम. सी. काम्प्लेक्स शाखा , विशाखापट्टणम जिला , पिनकोड -530020 , आंध्र प्रदेश

304. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

लॉसन्सबे कॉलनी शाखा, विशाखापट्टणम जिला , पिन कोड-530017 , आंध्र प्रदेश

305. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

वैयक्तिक एवं सेवा बैंकिंग शाखा , विशाखापट्टणम जिला , पिन कोड-530013 , आंध्र प्रदेश

306. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

दीपांजलीनगर शाखा , विशाखापट्टणम जिला , पिन कोड -531020 , आंध्र प्रदेश

307. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद पी. एम. पालेम शाखा , विशाखापट्टणम जिला, पिन कोड-530041 , आंध्र प्रदेश

308. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

जिला कोर्ट काम्प्लेक्स शाखा , विशाखापट्टणम जिला , पिनकोड-530002 , आंध्र प्रदेश

309. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

अक्कयपालेम शास्त्रा, विशाखापट्णम जिला, पिन कोड-530016 , आंध्र प्रदेश

310. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

एस.बी.टी. मार्केट शाखा , विजयनगरम जिला पिन कोड-535003 , आंध्र प्रदेश

311. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद पावर्ती पुरम शाखा, विजयनगरम जिला , पिन कोड-535501 , आंध्र प्रदेश

312. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद नरसन्नापेट शाखा , श्रीकाकुलम जिला , पिन कोड-532421 , आंध्र प्रदेश

313. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद बेरहमपुर शाखा, गंजाम जिला , पिन कोड-760005 , क्षेत्र- II

314. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , विजयवाडा , पिन कोड-520003 , आंध्र प्रदेश

4359

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18, 1930

315. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद गांधी नगर शाखा , कृष्णा जिला , पिन कोड-520003 , आंध्र प्रदेश

316. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद सिविल कोर्ट शाखा, कृष्णा जिला , पिन कोड -520002, आंध्र प्रदेश

317. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद पटमटलंका शाखा, कृष्णा जिला, पिन कोड -520001 , आंध्रप्रदेश

318. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद दक्षिण मध्य रेलवे शाखा , विजयवाड़ा , कृष्णा जिला , पिन कोड-520001 , आंध्र प्रदेश

319. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद चिट्टीनगर शाखा , कृष्णा जिला, पिन कोड -520009, आंध्र प्रदेश

320. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद सेवाशाखा , विजयवाड़ा, कृष्णा जिला, पिन कोड-520002, आंध्र प्रदेश

321. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद मोगलराजपुरम शाखा, कृष्णा जिला , पिन कोड -520010, आंध्र प्रदेश

322. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद जग्गय्यापेट शाखा, कृष्णा 'जिला, पिन कोड -521175, आंध्र प्रदेश

323. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद गुडीवाडा, शाखा , कृष्णा जिला , पिन कोड -521301 , आंध्र प्रदेश :

324. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद मछलीपट्टणम शाखा , कृष्णा जिला , पिन कोड -521001 , आंध्र प्रदेश

325. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद मुदुनूरु शाखा, कृष्णा जिला , पिन कोड-521261 , आंध्र प्रदेश

326. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद नुजविड शाखा , कृष्णा जिला , पिन कोड-521201 , आंध्र प्रदेश

327. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद कृष्णलंका शाखा , कृष्णा जिला , पिन कोड-522007 , आंध्र प्रदेश

328. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद चन्द्रमौली नगर शाखा, गुंटूर जिला , पिन कोड -522007 , आंध्र प्रदेश

329. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद रोपीचेरला शाखा , गुंटूर जिला , पिन कोड-522615, आंध्र प्रदेश

330. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

गुम्मनमपाडु शाखा , गुंटूर जिला , पिन कोड -522614, आंध्र प्रदेश

331. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद ओंगोल शाखा , प्रकाशम जिला , पिन मोड-523001 , आंध्र प्रदेश 4360

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

332. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

! कर्नूल रोड शाखा , प्रकाशम जिला , पिन कोड-523002 , आंध्र प्रदेश

333. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

i चीराला शाखा , प्रकाशम जिला, पिन कोड-523155 , आंध्र प्रदेश

334. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

1 इंक्ौल्लूशाखा , प्रकाशम जिला, पिन कोड-523167, आंध्र प्रदेश

335. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद दूपाडु शाखा , प्रकाशम जिला , पिन कोड -523330 , आंध्र प्रदेश

336. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद कंबुंकुरु शाखा , प्रकाशम जिला, पिन कोड-523105 , आंध्र प्रदेश

337. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद टंगुटूरु शाखा , प्रकाशम जिला , पिन कोड -523274 , आंध्र प्रदेश

क्षेत्र-13

338. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

काहीनाडा शाखा , पूर्व गोदावरी जिला, पिन कोड-533001 , आंध्र प्रदेश

339. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

काकीनाडा- तीसरी बटालियन शाखा , पूर्व गोदावरी जिला, पिनकोड-533005 , आंध्र प्रदेश

340. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

! काकीनाडा- सवर्पवरम शाखा , पूर्व गोदावरी जिला , पिन कोड-533005 , आंध्र प्रदेश

341. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद काकीनाडा-जिला परिषद शाखा , पूर्व गोदावरी जिला , पिन कोड-533004, आंध्र प्रदेश

342. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

कीसनाकुर्रु शाखा , पूर्व गोदावरी जिला, पिन कोड -533220 , आंध्र प्रदेश

343. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

माचावरम शाखा , पूर्व गोदावरी जिला , पिन कोड-533214, आंध्र प्रदेश

344. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद राजमंद्री शाखा, पूर्व गोदावरी जिला , पिन कोड -533001 , आंध्र प्रदेश

345. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद राजमंद्री-कोटागुम्मम शाखा , पूर्व गोदावरी जिला , पिन कोड-533001 , आंध्र प्रदेश

346. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद

राजमंद्री - एमजीडब्ल्यूसी एम शाखा , पूर्व गोदावरी जिला , पिनकोड-533103 , आंध्र प्रदेश

347. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद राजंलापालेम शाखा, पूर्व गोदावरी जिला , पिन कोड-533238 , आध्रि प्रदेश

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 348. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद रायवरम शाखा , पूर्व गोदावरी जिला, पिन कोड-533346, आंध्र प्रदेश

349. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद राजोल शाखा, पूर्व गोदावरी जिला , पिन कोड-533242, आंध्र प्रदेश

350. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद मंडापेटा शाखा, पूर्व गोदावरी जिला, पिन कोड-533308 , आंध्र प्रदेश

351. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद एलुरु शाखा , पश्चिम गोदावरी जिला, पिन कोड-534001 , आंध्र प्रदेश

352. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ हैदराबाद जंगारेड्‌डीगुडेम शाखा , पश्चिम गोदावरी जिला , पिन कोड-534447 , आंध्र प्रदेश

स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर नई दिल्ली क्षेत्रीय कार्यायल

353. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय एस. बी. टो हाउस , 18/4 , आर्य समाज रोड , तृतीय तल , करोल बाग , नई दिल्ली-110005 , दूरभाष : 28751648-52, फैक्स : 28751651 ई -मेल[email protected]

354. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर , मारूति उद्योग लिमिटेड , गुड़गाँव , पोस्ट बॉक्स नं. 9 , पालम गुड़गाँव रोड , गुड़‌गाँव , हरियाणा-122015

355. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर ,

डी एल एफ एन्क्लेव एस जी नं. 106 , गलेरिया माल , फेज- IV गुड़गाँव

356. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर , सेक्टर 18 , ग्राउंड फ्लोर , उद्योग मीनार , hside बिल्डिंग, उद्योग विहार , फेज V गुड़गाँव

357. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर ,

सेक्टर 8 , रोहिणी शाखा , पोस्ट बॉक्स नं 10005 , बालाजी प्लाजा , सेक्टर 8 , पॉकेट C- 9 रोहिणी , नई दिल्ली 110085 358. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर,

नोएडाशाखा , पोस्ट बॉक्स नं 53 , सेक्टर 18 , J1 & 2ब्लॉक गौतम बुद्ध नगर , उत्तर प्रदेश 201301

359. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर ,

करोल बाग शाखा , पोस्ट बॉक्स न. 2651 , एस. बी. टी हाउस, 18/4 , आर्य समाज रोड, करोग बाग , नई दिल्ली-110005

360. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर, स्वरूप नगर, कानपुर , 1st फ्लोर, नादरी कॉम्प्लेक्स , स्वरूप नगर , कानपुर , उत्तर प्रदेश 208002 4361

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रवण 18, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

361. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर , जयपुर - एम आई रोड शाखा , पोस्ट बॉक्स न. 354 , पहली मंजिल, श्याम अनुकंपा , अशोक मार्ग , सी- स्कीम , जयपुर- राजस्थान 302 001

362. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर , चंडीगढ़ शाखा, SCO नं. 206-207 , सब सिटो सेन्टर, सेक्टर-34 ए, चंडीगढ़ 160022

363. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर , ए आर एम बी शाख्खा , नई दिल्ली , पोस्ट बॉक्स न. 2658 , एस. बी. टी हाउस , 18/4 , आर्य समाज रोड , करोल बाग , नई दिल्ली -110-005

364. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर, लखनऊ शाखा , सेक्टर एफ, कपूरथला कॉम्पलेक्स, अलीगंज , लखनऊ , उत्तर प्रदेश 226020

365. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर, पार्लियामेंट स्ट्रीट शाखा गेट नं. 4 ए, ग्राउंड फ्लोर , जीवन तारा बिल्डिंग 5 , पार्लियामेंट स्ट्रीट, संसद मार्ग, नई दिल्ली- 110001

366. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर , आर. के. पुरम शाखा , पोस्ट बॉक्स नं. 4 , पहली मंजिल , अंसल चैम्बर्स , भीकाजी कामा प्लेस , नई दिल्ली -110066 367. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर, सरोजनी नगर , नई दिल्ली , पोस्ट बॉक्स नं. 4832 , विनय नगर , बंगाली सीनियर सेकेंडरी स्कूल , सरोजनी नगर , नई दिल्ली -110023

368. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर , सेवा शाखा , एम 127 , 2nd फ्लोर, आउटर सर्किल , कनाट सर्कस,, नई दिल्ली 110001

369. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर, तिलक नगर , नई दिल्ली ws 112 C , मीनाक्षी गार्डन , मेन नजफगढ़ रोड, तिलक नगर , नई दिल्ली 110018 370. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर , कमर्शियल शाखा , त्रावणकोर हाउस , कस्तूरबा गाँधी मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110001

371. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ त्रावणकोर , मयूर विहार शाखा 1st फ्लोर, सचदेवा प्लाजा, मयूर विहार फेज II , दिल्ली 110092

स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला

372. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , एससीओ-431 , सैक्टर -8 , पंचकूला , जिला पंचकूला (हरियाणा) -134109

373. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला ,

एसएसआई विशेष शाखा जी. टी. रोड, पानीपत ( हरियाणा ) 374. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला,

(कपड़ा मार्किट) अम्बाला सिटी , ( हरियाणा ) -134 002 375. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला,

मकान नं. 2128-29 , ब्लॉक नं. 2 सपाटू रोड, अम्बाला सिटी जी. टी. रोड, ( हरियाणा ) - 134 002

376. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, (सदर बाजार ) , अम्बाला कैंट ( हरियाणा ) 134 001 377. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , हाऊसिंग बोर्ड कालोनी 238 , समबाग रोड, अम्बाला कैंट (हरियाणा) -133-001

378. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, एस. ए. जैन कॉलेज, अम्बाला सिटी ( हरियाणा) 379. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , आर्य गर्ल्ड कॉलेज, अम्बाला कैंट ( हरियाणा )

380. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , चंडीगढ़ रोड, धूलकोट , अम्बाला सिटी ( हरियाणा ) 381. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, हुड्‌डा सैक्टर -9 , अम्बाला सिटी ( हरियाणा ) -134-003 382. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , अनाज मण्डी, कलयात , तहसील नरवाना , जिला कैथल ( हरियाणा ) -126117

383. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , एन. जी. एम. नई अनाज मण्डी, कैथल , जिला कैथल ( हरियाणा) -132 027

384. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, रामथली जिला कैथल ( हरियाणा)

385. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, कुरार तहसील नरवाना , जिला कैथल ( हरियाणा ) - 132147 386. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, गुहला चीका डाकघर चीका, जिला कुरूक्षेत्र ( हरियाणा ) -132034

387. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , पिहोवा, डाकघर पिकोना , तहसील पिहोवा , जिला कुरूक्षेत्र (हरियाणा) -132128

388. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, 3 कुरूक्षेत्र , जिला कुरूक्षेत्र ( हरियाणा ) -132118 389. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, शाहबाद मारकण्डा, जिला कुरूक्षेत्र ( हरियाणा ) -132135 390. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियोला, आर्य हाई स्कूल , थानेसर ( कुरूक्षेत्र ) ( हरियाणा ) -132.1.18 391. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, नजदीक सिवल हस्पताल रोड लाडवा , जिला कुरूक्षेत्र (हरियाणा) 136132

392. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , कालका, जिला पंचकूला ( हरियाणा ) 133: 302 393. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, चण्डी मन्दिर , तहसील कालका, जिला पंचकूला ( हरियाणा ) -133 302

394. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , कालका, एन. आर. डब्लयू, जिला पंचकूला ( हरियाणा ) -133 302 4362

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 /SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 395. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , पर्सनल बैंकिंग शाखा , ( सैक्टर-6 ) पंचकूला , जिला पंचकूला ( हरियाणा) - 134 109

413. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , डुमेर खां कलां , तहसील नरवाना , जिला जींद ( हरियाणा ) -126 116

396. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , एस. सी. ओ . 80 सैक्टर -12 , पंचकूला ( हरियाणा )

414. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , करसिंधू तहसील व जिला जींद ( हरियाणा ) 126 015

415. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , डी. आर. डी. ए. जींद ( हरियाणा ) 126 102

397. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , एस. एम. एरिया , शुगर मिल एरिया , पोस्ट बॉक्स नं. 40 , यमुना नंगर , ( हरियाणा ) - 135 001

416. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, रेलवे रोड , करनाल ( मेन ) ( हरियाणा ) 132 001 398. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, यमुनागर ( हरियाणा ) -135 001

399. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, इण्डस्ट्रीयल एरिया युमना नगर ( हरियाणा ) 135 001

417. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , घरौंडा, जी. टी. रोड तहसील व जिला करनाल (हरियाणा ) -132 114

418. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, एन. डी. आर. आई. करनाल ( हरियाणा ) -132 001 400. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , गांव व डाकघर मुसतफाबाद , जिला युमना नगर, (हरियाणा ) -133 102

419. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , असंध , जिला करनाल ( हरियाणा ) -132 009

401. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , ए. डी. बी. जगाधरी , जिला युमना नगर ( हरियाणा ) -135 003

420. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, बवाना , गांव व डाकघर बुआना लख्खू, जिला करनाल (हरियाणा ) -132 141

402. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, कैथल ( ए. डी. बी. ) , जिला कैथल ( हरियाणा ) - 132027

421. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, अर्बन एस्टेट , सैक्टर -13 , करनाल ( हरियाणा) -132 001 403. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, रामगढ़ तहसील कालका , जिला युमना नगर ( हरियाणा ) -140202

422. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , मुहाऊदीनपुर तहसील व जिला करनाल ( हरियाणा ) 404. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , जगाधरी, उत्तरी रेलवे वर्कशाप , जिला युमना नगर (हरियाणा ) -135 002

423. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, दयाल सिंह कॉलेज करनाल , जिला करनाल ( हरियाणा ) -132001

424. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , अर्बन एस्टेट , सैक्टर -6 , करनाल ( हरियाणा ) -132 001 405. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , संत गुखं नानक खालसा हाई स्कूल जगाधरी , जिला युमनागर ( हरियाणा ) -135 002

425. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, जी-40 , स्कूल- कम- कनाल एरिया , नीलोखेड़ी , 132117 जिला करनाल ( हरियाणा )

406. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, यमुना नंगर ( एस. एस. आई ) , जिला युमनागर (हरियाणा ) -135 001

426. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , जी. टी. रोड पानीपत ( हरियाणा ) 132 103

407. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, ( जी. एम. जी. सी. ) संतपुरा , युमना नगर ( हरियाणा ) -135 001

427. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, समालखा, जिला पानीपत ( हरियाणा ) 132 105 408. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , बिलासपुर , जिला युमनागर ( हरियाणा )

428. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, थर्मल प्लांट, पानीपत ( हरियाणा ) 132 105

409. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , (मिनी सैक्ट्रीएंट ) जगाधरी , जिला युमनागर ( हरियाणा ) -135 003

429. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , फर्टिलाइज़र कॉम्पलैक्स, डाकघर खादी आश्रम जी. टी. रोड, पानीपत ( हरियाणा ) -132 104

410. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, तहसील व जिला जींद , ( हरियाणा ) 126 102

411. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , पटियाला चौंक , जींद ( हरियाणा ) - 126 102

430. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , नजदीक पुरानी कचहिरीयां , रोहतक रोड सोनीपत (हरियाणा ) -131001

412. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, मिनी सैक्ट्रीऐट एरिया 10 हाउँसिंग बोर्ड कालोनी , जींद (हरियाणा ) -126 102

431. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, गढ़वाल , गांव व डाकघर गढ़वाल , जिला सोनीपत ( हरियाणा ) -131 030

d [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

432. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , मिनी सैक्ट्रीऐट, सोनीपत ( हरियाणा ) -131 001

433. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला छोटी मण्डी, रेलवे रोड, गन्नौर , जिला सोनीपत (हरियाणा ) 434. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , भिवानी ( रेलवे रोड) तहसील व जिला भिवानी ( हरियाणा ) -125 021

435. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , भिवानी, ( नई अनाज मण्डी) तहसील व जिला भिवानी (हरियाणा ) -125 021

436. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, कुंगर तहसील व जिला भिवानी , ( हरियाणा) -125041 437. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, विकास नगर, भिवानी , तहसील व जिला भिवानी , (हरियाणा ) -125 021

438. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, नेकीपुर-ढिगवा , गांव व डाकघर नेकीपुर , वाया ढिगवा तहसील लुहारू जिला भिवानी ( हरियाणा)

439. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , मिनी सैक्ट्रीऐट , भिवानी , तहसील व जिला भिवानी ( हरियाणा ) -125 021

440. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, (आदर्श कॉलेज ) , जिला- भिवानी ( हरियाणा )

441. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , हिसार ( रेलवे रोड ) तहसील व जिला हिसार ( हरियाणा ) -125001

442. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, मायर गांव व डाकघर मायर तहसील टोहाना, जिला हिसार ( हरियाणा) -125001

443. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , खड़क पुनिया , जिला हिसार , तहसील हांसी

(हरियाणा ) -126 011

444. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला,

हिसार आटोमोबाइल मार्केट 206-207 बरनाला रोड हिसार ( हरियाणा) -125 001

445. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, ( दौलतपुर चौक ) वार्ड नं. - 3 बरवाला जिला हिसार (हरियाणा ) -126 010

446. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला ,

भूना जाखल , भूना रोड , जिला फतेहाबाद ( हरियाणा ) 447. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला,

टोहाना आई.जी. गर्वनमेंट कॉलेज बिल्डिंग , नजदीक एस.ओ. एम. ऑफिस सिवल

448. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला ,

नारनौल ( जिला कोर्टस ) त्तहसील नारनौल , जिला मोहिन्द्रगढ़ (हरियाणा ) -123 001

2823 G1/08-3

4363

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

449. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , बवाना, गांव व डाकघर बवाना , जिला मोहिन्द्रगढ़ (हरियाणा) -123 029

450. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, अटेली मण्डी, जिला मौहिन्द्रगढ़ (हरियाणा ).

451. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , कनीना मण्डी, डाकघर कनीना , जिला मोहिन्द्रगढ , (हरियाणा)-123 027

452. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, रतिया जिला फतेहाबाद , ( हरियाणा )

453. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , खेड़ी सांपला, ( नजदीक रेलवे स्टेशन ), जिला रोहतक (हरियाणा) -124 501

454.. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , रोहतक, जिला रोहतक ( हरियाणा ) - 124 001

455. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , सर्कुलर रोड, डी.एल.एफ. कालोनी , रोहतक , जिला रोहतक ( हरियाणा) -124 001

456. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , काठ मण्डी, रोहतक , जिला रोहतक ( हरियाणा) -124 001 457. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , सिरसा मेन , 203 , न्यूएडीशनल तहसील व जिला सिरसा ( हरियाणा ) -125 055

458. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, नथ्थूश्री चोपता तहसील व जिला सिरसा ( हरियाणा ) -125 055

459. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , रनिया ( नजदीक बस स्टैंड ) जिला सिरसा (हरियाणा ) -125 055

460. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , ऐलनाबाद, मेन बाजार , ममेरा चौक जिला सिरसा ( हरियाणा )

461. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, सैक्टर-15 , एससीओ-11, पंचकूला ( हरियाणा) 462. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला , सैक्टर-20 , एससीओ 236 पंचकूला (हरियाणा)

463. स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला, माता मनसा देवी कम्पलैक्स , सैक्टर -5 , एससीओ 87-88 पंचकूला ( हरियाणा )

सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

464. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, पीएमटी लोणी शाखा , यूटीलिटी कांप्लेक्स, लोणी, बुदुक , ता. राहता , जिला- अहमदनगर , महाराष्ट्र

465. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया ,

सिवनी मालवा शाखा, भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के सामने, बनापुर -सिवनी मालवा रोड , होशंगाबाद ( म.प्र. ) पिनकोड : 461 221 4364

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18, 1930

मोहता नगर शाखा , भागीरथपुरा , इन्दौर -म.प्र. 466. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया ,

467. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , ग्वालियर विकास प्राधिकरण शाखा 1 , रविनगर , ग्वालियर विकास प्राधिकरण ग्वालियर ( मध्य प्रदेश ) पिन : 474 002

468. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , अशोक नगर शाखा , मंडी रोड , अशोका नगर ( म.प्र. )

469. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , शुजालपुर शाखा , 11/259 , महात्मा गांधी मार्ग , शुजालपुर , जिला. शाजापुर , म.प्र पिनकोड : 456333

470. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, गोपालगंज शाखा, गोपालगंज सागर , म.प्र. , पिन : 470 001

471. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, हसनगंज पोस्ट ऑफिस हसनगंज , जिला. कटिहार ( बिहार )

472. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , एंजिल पब्लिक स्कूल शाखा, सहदेव गली , विश्वास नगर , दिल्ली-110 032

473. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , .डी डी ए मंगलापुरी शाखा , डी.डी.ए. प्रोजेक्ट ऑफिस , मंगलापुरी , दिल्ली-110 045

474. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , सेक्टर 18 , रोहिणी शाखा , एच 3/27 , सेक्टर 18 , राहिणी दिल्ली -110 085

475. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , शालीमार बाग शाखा , बी.पी. 56 , शालीमार बाग , :दिल्ली -110088

476. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया,

एयरफोर्स स्टेशन शाखा, 412 , एयरफोर्स स्टेशन , क्लब रोड , नई दिल्ली-110003

477. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, लेडी हार्डिंग मेडिकल कालेज एवं हास्पिटल शाखा , लेडी हार्डिंग मेडिकल कालेज एवं हास्पिटल पंचकुइया रोड के सामने नई दिल्ली -110001 478. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया,

न्यूग्रीन फील्ड पब्लिक स्कूल शाखा , न्यूग्रीन फील्ड पब्लिक स्कूल , साकेत मार्ग नः 22 पोस्ट आफिस- साकेत , नईदिल्ली -110017

479. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , खेड़ा खुर्द शाखा 154 , प्रधान मार्केट होलम्बी रोड, खेड़ा खुर्द खेड़ा कलां , दिल्ली -110082

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 480. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , बरवाला शाखा , खसरा नं. - 87/72 , बवाना रोड , बरवाला-110039

481. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , एसडी स्कूल , शाहदरा शाखा, बड़ा बाजार , सनातन धर्म सीनियर सेकेन्डरी स्कूल , शाहदरा, दिल्ली -110032

482. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , बाढ़मेर शाखा , कामदार कम्पनी के पास , राय कालोनी रोड, बाढ़मेर-344001 ( राज. )

483. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, नाथद्वारा शाखा , गोकुल प्लाजा , भंडारी जी का काम्पलेक्स, नई सड़क, पोस्ट आफिस- नाथद्वारा , जिला-राजसमंद-313301 ( राज. )

484. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , बूंदी शाखा बहादुर सिंह सर्किल के आगे , कैलाश कुंज नैनवां रोड , बूंदी -323001 ( राज. )

485. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, गंगापुर सिटी शाखा , हिण्डौन- करोली रोड, उदई मोड़ , गंगापुर सिटी सवाई माधोपुर , जिला-सवाई माधोपुर -322202 ( राज. )

486. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , धोबीघाट शाखा धोबीघाट , दैनिक भास्कर के पास, इन्दिरा गाँधी मार्ग , रिंग रोड , साऊथ सिविल लाईन्स जबलपुर

487. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, राजाजीपुरम शाखा , ई -2203 , प्रथम तल , राजाजी पुरम , लखनऊ , उत्तर प्रदेश

488. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, राघवनगर शाखा , मकान नं. -291/ 10 , मोहल्ला राघव नगर , देवरिया -274001 उत्तर प्रदेश

489. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , एपीएमसी अमरावती शाखा, न्यू कॉटन मार्केट , सहकार नगर , अमरावती-444604

490. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , प्रताप नगर रिंग रोड शाखा, प्लाट नं. -23 पडोले हॉस्पिटल के पास , प्रताप नगर , रिंग रोड़, नागपुर-440022 .

491. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , बांद्रा कुर्ला कार्यालय , प्लॉट नं. -368 , साई आशिष अपार्टमेन्ट स्वामी विवेकानंद रोड , बान्द्रा ( पश्चिम) मुम्बई -400050

492. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, विक्रोली शाखा , बिल्डिंग सी-1 , फिरोजशाह नगर , हिल साइड , लाल बहादुर शास्त्री मार्ग, विक्रोली ( पश्चिम ) , मुंबई -400079 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

493. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, वरली शाखा , श्री चन्द्र बाबा मंदिर ट्रस्ट बिल्डिग डा. एनी बेसन्ट रोड, वरली नाका, मुंबई-400018 494. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , गरहा चौक शाखा , जिला- मुजफ्फरपुर, बिहार 495. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, हरपुर हरदास शाखा , खोकसा बुजुर्ग , देसरी जिला-वैशाली, बिहार

496. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, अमनौर शाखा, ब्लाक - गढहा चौक, भचहा ब्लाक, जिला-मुजफ्फरपुर

497. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , पटेढी बेलसर शाखा अनिरूद्ध बेलसर, जिला- वैशाली , बिहार-844111 498. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, रूस्तमपुर शाखा , कच्ची दरगाह पटना सिटी , पटना, बिहार 499. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , तेरसिया शाखा , हाजीपुर जिला- वैशाली, बिहार-844101 500. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, भगवानपुर शाखा मीना काम्पलेक्स , रेवा रोड , मुजफ्‌फरपुर, जिला-मुजफ्फरपुर, बिहार

501. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , रहसा शाखा, भगवानपुर , जिला- वैशाली , बिहार-844114 502. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , पहाड़पुर शाखा गजरौल भगवानपुर वैशाली. बिहार-844114

503. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , मेहसौल शाखा , रून्त्रीसैदपुर , जिला-सीतामढ़ी बिहार-843328

504. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, माधोपुर चतुरी शाखा , सौराह नगापुर, जिला-सीतामढी बिहार-843333

505. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , पोहयार शाखा , पोहयार , शिपाली भवन , जिला- वैशाली, बिहार-844507

506. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, डीडीए रोहिणी शाखा डीडीए आफिस काम्पलेक्स, दीपाली चौक, सेक्टर -3 , रोहिणी , दिल्ली -110085 507. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, डीग शाखा , हिन्दी लाइब्रेरी के सामने , पुरानी अनाज मंडी, डीग , जिला- भरतपुर-321203( राज.)

508. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , दौसा शाखा , बोहरा मोटर्स बिल्डिंग आगरा रोड , दौसा पोस्ट आफिस व जिला, दौसा-303303 ; (राजस्थान) 509. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , सुमेरपुर शाखा आयकर आफिस के पास , गणेश मार्ग , सुमेरपुर जिला-पाली-306902 ( राज. )

4365

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

510. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , जलोरा शाखा , राजेन्द्रा काम्पलेक्स , हरदेव जोशी सर्कल जालोरा -343001 (राज. )

511. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , बांद्रा कुर्ला शाखा प्लाट नं.- सी-6 , बी ब्लाक बान्द्राकुर्ला कॉम्पलेक्स बान्द्रा ( पूर्व) मुंबई-400051

512. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, बोरिवली शाखा , गणेश भवन , पै नगर बोरीवली ( पश्चिम) मुंबई-400092

513. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , दहिसर पूर्व शाखा शिवशक्तिकॉप्पलेक्स, एस वी रोड , दहिसर पूर्व, मुंबई-400068

514. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, कालिना शाखा , 168 , डायमंड इस्टेट , महाआटो के पास , सीएसटी रोड, विद्या नगरी , कलीना , मुंबई -400068 515. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया; लोअर परेल शाखा , श्रीनिवास कॉटन मिल्स कम्पाउंड , तुलसी पाइप रोड , लोअर परेल मुंबई -400013

सिंडिकेट बैंक

516. सिंडीकेट बैंक , सोजती गेट, जोधपुर शाखा , होटल गोपालकृष्ण बिल्डिंग सोजती गेट, जोधपुर -342001 राज्य : राजस्थान

517. सिंडीकेट बैंक झालाना डूंगरी जयपुर शाखा , आगरा बाईपास , आर एस बी सी सेतु भवन, झालाना डूंगरी जला जयपुर-302004 राज्य : राजस्थान

518. सिंडीकेट बैंक, मानेसर शाखा , ग्राम और डाक कार्यालय मानेसर कासन रोड, मानेसर, जिला गुड़गांव-1222050 . राज्य : हरियाणा

519. सिंडीकेट बैंक, गुड़गांव अग्रणी जिला कार्यालय 472/11 पुराना रेलवे रोड , गुड़गांव , जिला : गुड़गांव-122001 , राज्य: हरियाणा

520 .. सिंडीकेट बैंक ,

छिन्दवाड़ा शाखा , सैंट जोसफ हाई स्कूल के सामने खजरी रोड, छिन्दवाड़ा-480001 राज्य : मध्य प्रदेश

521. सिंडीकेट बैंक ,

बैतूल शाखा, ब्र‌ह्माकुमारी आश्रम के नजदीक , सदर इटारसी रोड , बैतूल -460001 राज्य : मध्य प्रदेश [PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9, 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

4366

526. सिंडीकेट बैंक , मरसूर शाखा जय ज्योति लेमिनेट्स कंपाउण्ड चंदापुर अनेकल रोड अनेकल तालुक

522. सिंडीकेट बैंक , मंडला शाखा प्लॉट नं. 10/8 रानी अवन्ती बाई वार्ड मंडला रायपुर मेन रोड मंडला -481661 481661 राज्यः मध्य प्रदेश

जिला : बेंगलूर ग्रामीण -562106

राज्य : कर्नाटक

523.. सिंडीकेट बैंक,

इन्दौर अन्नपूर्णा रोड शाखा सं. 21 , चन्देरो कोठी अन्नपूर्णा मेन रोड, सुदामा नगर पी.ओ. इन्दौर-452009

राज्य : मध्य प्रदेश

527. सिंडीकेट बैंक , शंकरनगर एपीएमसी वार्ड शाखा 151 , शंकरनगर मेन रोड, बेंगलूर -560096 राज्य : कर्नाटक

524. सिंडिकेट बैंक , शिकोहाबाद शाखा बस स्टैंड के पास शिकोहाबाद जिला :फिरोजाबाद -205135

राज्य: उत्तर प्रदेश

528. सिंडीकेट बैंक, के.एच.रोड के एस आर टी सी डिपो शाखा के एस आर टी सी डिपो ट्रान्सपोर्ट हाउस कैंगल हनुमंतय्या रोड बेंगलूर शहर -560027 राज्य : कर्नाटक

525. सिंडिकेट बैंक , कोरमंगला जे. ब्लाक शाखा सं. 703 , 111 ब्लॉक बी डी ए शापिंग कॉम्पलेक्स के पीछे कोरमंगला III ब्लॉक

जिला : बेंगलूर शहर -560034

529. सिंडिकेट बैंक, नागसंद्रा शाखा जिला: तुमकूर-572134 राज्य : कर्नाटक

राज्य : कर्नाटक

बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

झारखंड क्षेत्र

पता

बैंक का नाम

शाखा का नाम

क्र. सं.

(3)

(4)

(1 )

(2)

530

अमलाबाद शाखा

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

पो.ऑ. अमलाबाद कोलियरी , जिला धनबाद पिन-828311

531.

बैंक मोड़ शाखा

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

बसिया शाखा

532. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

भौंरा शाखा

533.

पोस्ट बाक्ससं. 2 , बैंक मोड़ , धनबाद-826 001 पो.ऑ. बसिया , जिला: गुमला 835 229 भौंरा , धनबाद-828 302

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

बिरनी शाखा

534,

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

पो.आ. बिरनी , पीएस. पालांजी , गिरिडीह -825 318

535: युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

बिष्टुपुर शाखा

जिला -जमशेदपुर पिन-831 001 " आर रोड " , बिस्टुपुर , जमशेदपुर,

बोकारो स्टील सिटि

530

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

प्लाट सं. ई6 , सिटि सेंटर , बोकारो स्टील सिटि पिन-827 004 , झारखंड

557.

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

बोकारोस्टील सिटि

इंडस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट

चान्हो

बोकारो इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया , पो.आ. बालिडीह बोकारो -827 010 ग्रा. पो. चान्हो, रांची-835214

538. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

चरही

539. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

(पुलिस स्टेशन के सामने ) पो.आ.चरही , जिला-हजारीबाग बिहार-825 336

चास बाजार

540.

चास , धनबाद-827013

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

541 .

डाल्टनगंज

धरमशाला रोड , डाल्टनगंज , पालामू 822 101 युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

देवघर

542.

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

धनवाद

543. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

544,

डुमरी

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

एस.बी.राय रोड , देवघर जिला- देवघर -814112 पोस्ट वाक्स सं. 66 , नयाबाजार , धनबाद-826001 ग्राम-डुमरी , पो.ऑ. हिरंग , वाया- चतरा जिला- हजारीबाग 825 403 , झारखंड [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(2)

(1)

545. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 546. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 547. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 548. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 549. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 550.

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 551. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 552.

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 553. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 554. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 555.

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 556. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 557. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 558.

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 559 .

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 560. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 561 .

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 562.

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 563.

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 564. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 565. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 566. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 567.

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 568.

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 569. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

4367

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

(4)

(3)

घाटशिला

मेन रोड, घाटशिला , सिंहभूम-832 303 गिरिडीह

पोस्टबाक्स सं. 8 , गिरिडीह -815 301 हटिया

ई-115 , एच.ई.सी. टाउनशिप , जगन्नाथनगर धुरवा, रांची-834 004

हजारीबाग

पोस्ट बाक्स सं. 17 , हजारीबाग टाउन हजारीबाग-825 301

साकची, जमशेदपुर-831 001

जमशेदपुर

जरिडीह बाजार

पोस्ट जरिडीह बाजार ( बेरमो )

गिरिडीह-825214

झुमरीतलैया

झुमरीतिलैया, जिला-कोडरमा, पिन-825409

पो.आ.निरशाचटी , जिला- धनबाद , झारखंड कालुबाथान

कमदारा

कांके

कामदारा , जिलाः गुमला-835 227 पो.. कांके, रांची-834 006

केदला

केदला, पो.ऑ. परेज , घाटोतंद

हजारीबाग -825 314

कोलेबीर

कोलेबीरा , जिला:सिमडेगा -835211

कुरू, जिला-लोहरदगा -835213.

कुरू

लरीकालान

पो. ऑ.लरीकालान , जिला- हजारीबाग -829 112 लोहरदगा

मेन रोड, पो.ऑ. लोहरदगा , जिला: लोहरदगा-835 302

मंदार

मंदार , रांची-835 214

मोराबादी

यसादा टावर , टैगोर हिल रोड मोराबादी ,

रांची-838 008

नामकुम , रांची-834 010

नामकुम

नवाटोली

पो.ऑ. कोनबी नवाटोली बसिया जिला: गुमला-835 303

ओझाडीह

पो. ऑ. ओझाडीह-कांटानिया , जिला-धनबाद

झारखंड-828 109

परसाबाद

परसाबाद , जिला : कोडरमा-825 320

पो. ऑ. रामगढ़ , जिला- हजारीबाग -828 122 रामगढ़

रांची

पोस्ट बाक्स सं. 94 , मेन रोड

रांची-834001

1 रनिया

पो.ऑ.- रनिया, वाया- तोरपा जिला : रांची-835 227

सोसो

ब्लाक-रामगढ़ , पो. ऑ.-सोसो

जिला-हजारीबाग-825 101

सेंट कोलंबा कॉलेज

570.

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 571 .

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 572.

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 573.

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 574. युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया 575.

पो. ऑ. कॉलेज मोर, हजारीबाग -825 301 तपकारा

तपकारा , रांची-835 227

तोरपा

तोरपा, रांची-835 227

टुंडी

ग्रा. एवं पो.ऑ.टुंडी, धनबाद

झारखंड-828 142

आर. के. मिशन

विलियम टाउन , देवघर, झारखंड

विद्यापीठ , देवघर

झारखंड क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय

युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

पी पी कम्पाउंड , सलुजा बिल्डिंग , तृतीय तल मेन रोड, पोस्ट बाक्स सं. 172

रांची-834 001 4368

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18, 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , जयपुर , शाखा

586. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , रिटेल असैट शाखा, मेरठ, प्रथम मंजिल , राजकीय इंटर कॉलेज के सामने , बेगमपुल रोड, मेरठ-250 001 जिला मेरठ ( उ.प्र. )

576. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , जगतपुरा , जयपुर शाखा , ई -8 , आनंद विहार, रेलवे कालोनी , जयपुर-302075

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , देहरादून

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , रायपुर

577. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , कांकेर शाखा जनकपुर वार्ड, बस स्टैंड के पास , मेन रोड, कांकेर, जि. कांकेर

587. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , पटेल नगर शाखा पटेल नगर औद्योगिक क्षेत्र मार्ग , पटेलनगर , देहरादून , उत्तराखंड , पिन कोड-248001

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , चंडीगढ़

578. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, पंडरी रायपुर शाखा भाटिया भवन , मेन रोड, पंडरी , रायपुर , जि. रायपुर

588. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , रतिया शाखा मेन टोहाना रोड, रतिया ( हरियाणा)

579. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, महासमुंद शाखा एलआईसी आफिस के पास , मेन रोड , महासमुंद , जि. महासमुंद

589. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, उमरी शाखा, चंडीगढ़ गाँव व डाकखाना उमरी , जिला कुरूक्षेत्र ( हरियाणा )

580. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , गेवरा शाखा प्रगति नगर, सी टाईप काम्पलेक्स दीपका गेवरा, जिला कोरबा ( छ.ग. ) पिनकोड-495452

590. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, भुन्तर शाखा, नैशनल हाईवे 21 , सनबीम होटल के पास मेन बाजार, भुन्तर , जिला कुल्लू

581. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , रिटेल पुटेट शाखा अजीत टावर , रामसागर पारा , रायपुर, जिला रायपुर , (छ.ग.)-492001

591. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , सैक्टर -7 , चंडीगढ़ शाखा , एस.सी.ओ. 33 सैक्टर -7 , चंडीगढ़

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , इंदौर

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , लखनऊ

592. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , आस्ति पुनर्निर्माण शाखा , 29 , एम जी रोड , हजरतगंज , पोस्ट बॉक्स नंबर 101 , लखनऊ-226001

582. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, खजराना शाखा 12/12- ए, जीवन प्रदीप बिल्डींग एलआयसी बिल्डींग , अनूप नगर , ए.बी. रोड, इंदौर , म.प्र. -452011

583. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, रिटेल अॅसेट शाखा आयकेडीसी परिसर , 2 /2 ए ओल्ड पलासिया इंदौर , म.प्र. - 452001

593. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , यूनिटी कॉलेज शाखा , मौलाना कलबे आबिद रोड, हुसैनाबाद चौक , लखनऊ-226003

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , मेरठ

594. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , रिटेल एसेट शाखा , 2/9 ए , विनय खंड, गोमती नगर , लखनऊ -226010

नोडल क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , पटना

584. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , इंदिरापुरम शाखा प्लॉट सं, 6 , एक्सप्रैस मार्केट , विकास खण्ड, इंदिरापुरम गाजियाबाद , जिला गाजियाबाद ( उ.प्र. )

595. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , गोपालगंज शाखा, जनता सिनेमा, कैंपस , स्व. फूलदेव बाबू मार्ग , जिला-गोपालगंज , बिहार , पिन-841428

585. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, रिटेल असैट शाखा , गाजियाबाद 54, मॉडल टाउन , जी.टी. रोड , गाजियाबाद -201 001 जिला गाजियाबाद ( उ.प्र. ) [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नोडल क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , मुंबई ( दक्षिण ) 596. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया ,

लोअर परेल शाखा , यशवंत भवन , तल मंजिल , पांडुरंग बुधकर मार्ग , लोअर परेल , मुंबई-400 013

597. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, लालबाग शाखा, दुकान क्र. 1 , 2 एवं 3 , अनंत अपार्टमेंट , मेघवाडी, डॉ. एस.एस. राव , लालबाग , मुंबई-400 012

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, अहमदाबाद

598. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया ,

झुंडाल शाखा, ए-9 , कल्पतरु पार्क सोसायटी , ग्राम झुंडाल , तालुका-जिला गांधीनगर, पिन-382421

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, नासिक

599. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , जिलाधिकारी कार्यालय , नंदूरबार शाखा , नंदूरबार-425 412

600. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया ,

गारखेडा रोड , औरंगाबाद शाखा, प्लॉट नं. 67 , सेक्टर ए, गारखेडा रोड, औरंगाबाद-431 005

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , उत्तर ठाणे

यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया,

601.

कोपरखैरणे शाखा , कॅसाबेला , तल मंजिल , बी विंग प्लॉट नं. बी-219 , सेक्टर 19 , कोपरखैरणे , नवी मुंबई -410 709 601. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, कामोठे शाखा सह्याद्री , सी -011 , प्लाट नं. 13 , सेक्टर-10 , कामोठे , नवी मुंबई-410 209

603. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, धारावी शाखा, 82/एच , गोल्ड एनक्लेव , सायन बांद्रा लिंक रोड , मुंबई-400017

604. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, महापे शाखा,

पुनीत बिल्डिंग, यूनिट नं. 37 एवं 38 हस्ती इंडस्ट्रीयल प्रिमाईसेस, सीएचएसएल मिलीनियम बिजनेश पार्क के सामने महापे , नवी मुंबई -400 710

\

4369

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930 :

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , हैदराबाद

605. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, हिमायतनगर शाखा, डोर क्र. 3-5-919 से 925 बालाजी आर्केड , मेन रोड, हिमायत नगर , हैदराबाद-500 029

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , विजयचान

606. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, रिटेल असेट शाखा , तल मंजिल , 39-9-2/2 श्री वेंकटेश्वर स्वामी टेंपल स्ट्रिट लंब्बीपेट, विजयवाडा-520 010 जिला कृष्णा ( आन्ध्र प्रदेश)

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , एर्णाकुलम

607. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , मलप्पुरम शाखा, के.पी.एम. बिल्डिंग , मिडल हिल , एच एच 23,23 , मलप्पुरम-676-505 जिला मलप्पुरम ( केरल)

यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया ,

608.

पवरत्ती शाखा, फातिमा बिल्डिंग , बस स्टैण्ड के सामने , पवरत्ती-680507 , जिला त्रिश्शूर ( केरल )

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , सिलीगुड़ी

609. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, बहरामपुर शाखा, 24, राधिका मोहन सेन रोड, डाकखाना, बहरामपुर, जिला मुर्शिदाबाद , पिनकोड-742 101

610. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया,

कूचबिहार शाखा , निरुपमा भवन , सुनीति रोड, हरीशपाल चौपाटी के पास, कूचबिहार-736 101 611. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया ,

मालदा शाखा , 69/2, बी.जी. रोड, पी.एस. इंग्लिश बाज़ार, डाक मोकदूमपुर, जिला मालदा ( प. बंगाल ) , पिन 732 103

612. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया ,

रायगंज शाखा, कूली टावर , परबती स्कूल रोड, रायगंज वेस्ट, दिनाजपुर, पिन कोड-733 134 613. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया ,

सालगुडा मिलीटेरी स्टेशन शाखा , मिलीटेरी स्टेशन , शापिंग काम्प्लेक्स , सालगडहा , जिला जलपाई गुडी, पिन कोड-734 008 4370

[ PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

+

614. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, सेवोक रोड शाखा , रेनबो हाउस , सेवोक रोड, सिलीगुडी, जिला दार्जिलिंग , पिन कोड-734 001

624. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , प्रादेशिक कार्यालय , आलोक भारती टॉवर , शहीद नगर, भुवनेश्वर-751007

नोडल क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , कोलकाता

625.

615. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , टालीगंज करुणामयी शाखा , पहली मंजिल , मरलिन ग्रोव , राजा राम मोहन राय रोड, कोलकाता 008

ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स, प्रादेशिक कार्यालय , गलेरिया मार्किट , दूसरा तल , नचन रोड, बेनाचिटी, दुर्गापुर -713 213

616. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , संतोषपुर सर्वे पार्क शाखा , बी-178 , सर्वे पार्क, संतोषपुर, कोलकाता-700 075

626. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , प्रादेशिक कार्यालय , ओबीसी टॉवर , तीसरा तल , 917-20/0 ए, फर्ग्यूसन कालेज रोड, पुणे -411 004

617. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , सोनारपुर शाखा, सोनार केला , पहली मंजिल , सोनारपुर स्टेशन रोड, जिला 24 परगना दक्षिण , कोलकाता-700 150

618.: यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , रानीहाटी शाखा, ग्रा. पो. नवघर, जिला हावड़ा , प. बंगाल पिन-711 322

627. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , प्रादेशिक कार्यालय , अमन चेम्बर्स , पहला तल , वीर सावरकर मार्ग , न्यूपासपोर्ट कार्यालय के सामने , प्रभादेवी, मुम्बई-400 025

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , दिल्ली ( उत्तर )

628. ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , गंगटोक ( सिक्किम) -737 101 शाखा कार्यालय , पालजोर स्टेडियम,

619. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , दिल्ली ( उत्तर ) , 14-17 , प्रथम तल , स्थानीय विपणन केंद्र , बीक्यूब्लॉक , शालीमार बाग , दिल्ली-110 088

भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , आगरा

629. भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक , बेकरी जंक्शन , पोस्ट बॉक्स सं. 6507 , तिरुवनंतपुरम-695 003

620. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , आगरा , फ्रैंड्स वासन प्लाजा, संजयप्लेस, आगरा , जिला आगरा , 282 003

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , करनाल

630. भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक , रेल हैड कॉम्प्लेक्स , पो . बॉ. सं. 01 , जम्मू-180 012

इंडियन बैंक , तमिलनाडु

621. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , करनाल, माडल टाऊन करनाल कुंजपुरा चौक , करनाल ( हरियाणा )

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , गोवा

इंडियन बैंक, 631. प्रधान कार्यालय , 66 , राजाजी सालै , चेन्नै-600 001 नई दिल्ली

632. इंडियन बैंक,

522. यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , गोवा निझमार सेंटर, पहली मंजिल , आत्माराम बोरकर मार्ग , पणजी , गोवा-403 001

ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स

जसोला शाखा , एशिया पैसिफिक इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ मैनेजमेंट , 3 एवं 4 , इंस्टीट्यूशनल एरिया , जसोला, (सरिता विहार के सामने ) नई दिल्ली -110 002 52

633 . इंडियन बैंक, पंजाबी बाग शाखा , 53 , वेल्ट एवन्यूसेड, पंजाबी बाग ( पश्चिम ) , नई दिल्ली -110026

ओरियन्टल बैंक ऑफ कॉमर्स , प्रादेशिक कार्यालय , दी लौंडमार्क , पहला तल , नम्बर-21/15 , महात्मा गांधी रोड, बंगलौर-560 001 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

634. इंडियन बैंक , माइक्रोसेट शाखा, 2/7 , प्रथम तल , देशबन्धु गुप्ता रोड, पहाड़गंज , नई दिल्ली-110055

शालीमार बाग शाखा , 103-104, यू एण्ड वी मार्केट, शालीमार बाग , नई दिल्ली-110088 635. इंडियन बैंक ,

636. इंडियन बैंक, राजमोहल्ला शाखा , 177 , दक्षिण राजमोहल्ला, वैष्णव बाल मंदिर प्रांगण , इंदौर-452009 (म.प्र.) 637. इंडियन बैंक , सेक्टर 17 , गुडगांव शाखा; 621, सेपदर 17, हाउसिंग बोर्ड कॉलोनी , गुड़गांव 122001 ( हरियाणा ) सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडियाः

638. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, भायंदर शाखा, पहला माला ओसवाल आँनेंट , जैन मंदिर के सामने , जेस्लपार्क रोड , भायंदर ( पूर्व) 401105 , जिला-ठाणे

639. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , न्यूपनवेल शाखा , इंद्र आंगन को.ऑप. सोसा. , पहला माला , प्लॉट नं. 2 , सेक्टर-9 , खादा कॉलोनी चौक , न्यूपनवेल-410206, जिला-रायगढ़

640. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , वसंत विहार शाखा , अग्रवाल आर्केड , इडनवुड कॉम्प्लेक्स के सामने, चितलसर मानपाडा, ठाणे ( पश्चिम ) - 400610

641. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, सावर्डे शाखा, पोस्ट - सावर्डे, तालुका-चिपलून, जिला रत्नागिरी - 415606

642. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया , खेड शाखा , अनिकेत शॉपिंग प्लाझा , एस.टी , स्टैंड के पास, तालुका- खेड , जिला रत्नागिरी- 415709 643. सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया, नकदी प्रबंधन सेवाएं शाखा , दूसरी मंजिल, मुंबई मुख्य कार्यालय , एम. जी. रोड, फोर्ट मुंबई 400023

पंजाब नेशनल बैंक कोषिकोड क्षेत्र के अधीन शाखाएं

644. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शाखा कार्यालय : चेलारी , पी.वी. बिल्डिंग , पी.ओ. वेलिमुक्कु, चेलारी , जिला मलप्पुरम ( केरल )-676317 645. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शाखा कार्यालय : परप्पनंगाडी, 11/1778 , प्रथम तल , एसी कॉमर्शियल कॉमप्लेक्स , परप्पनंगाडी, जिला मलप्पुरम ( केरल ) -676303

646. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय : पोन्नानी , 30/86 डी, पीबी संख्या 17 , सिटी सेंटर , चन्तप्पडी, पोन्नानी, जिला मलप्पुरम ( केरल ) -6795771

:

2823G1/08-4

4371

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्तः 9 , 2008 श्रावण 18 , 1930

647. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय: बैंक रोड, कंण्णूर, प्रथम तल , सुशील टॉवर, कण्णूर, जिला कण्णूर ( केरल ) -670001

648. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय: कुट्टियाडी, कारापारा बिल्डिय , नजदीक सरकारी अस्पताल , कुट्टियाडी, जिला कोषिकोड ( केरल )-673508

649. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय : कालीकाव , वण्डूर रोड, कालीकाव, जिला मलप्पुरम (केरल ) -676525

650. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय : बेन्गरा , मालियक्कल बिल्डिंग , प्रथम तल, वेन्गरा , जिला मलप्पुरम ( केरल ) -676304 651. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शाखा कार्यालय : मेलडी , मेन रोड, मेलडी, जिला कोषिकोड (केरल ) 073522

652. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शाखा कार्यालय नांदापुरम , एन.के. कॉमप्लेक्स, बस अड्‌डे के सामने , नादापुरम , जिला कोषिकोड ( केरल) -673504

653. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक शाखा कार्यालय : टेलीचेरी , टीएमसी 44/4416 , पेरिस बिल्डिंग , लोगंस रोड, टेलीचेरी, जिला कण्णूर ( केरल) -670101

654. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शाखा कार्यालय : वडकरा , पी.बी. संख्या 5 , मेन रोड, वडकरा , जिला कोविकोड ( केरल ) -673101 655. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , क्षेत्रीय वसूली केन्द्र , पी.बी. संख्या 11 , के. पी. केशव मेनन रोड, कोषिकोड, जिला कोषिकोड ( केरल) -673101 656. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय : एरामंगलम, पी. ओ. एरामंगलम, जिला मलप्पुरम ( केरल ) -679587

657. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय : कुन्नमंगलम, मेन रोड, कुन्नमंगलम , जिला कोषिकोड ( केरल ) -673571

पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शाखा कार्यालय : मलप्पुरम , पी. बी. संख्या 203, 17/485/जे, बस स्टेण्ड रोड, पी. एम. आरकेड, मलप्पुरम , जिला मलप्पुरम ( केरल ) -676519 658.

659. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय : नममीण्डा, जिला कोषिकोद्ध ( केरल )-676613

660. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शाखा कार्यालय : पय्यन्नूर , पी.बी. संख्या 22 , सेन्ट्रल बाजार, फष्यन्त्रूर , जिला कण्णूर ( केरल ) -670307 4372:

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9, 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

678. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, 6/133- बी, सिल्वर प्लाजा , किचेरी पडी, मुवादुपुझा-686673 , केरल

661. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शाखा कार्यालय : पेरिन्तलमण्णा , 18 / 1129-21 व 30, सी.जे. टॉवर्स , उटी रोड , पेरिन्सलमण्णा, 'जिला मलप्पुरम (केरल) -679322

679. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , 4/33 , मेन रोड, नेनमारा -678508 , पालक्काड , केरल 662. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय : तिरूर , पी.बी. संख्या 13 , सेन्ट्रल जंक्शन , तिरूर , जिला मलप्पुरम ( केरल ) -676101

680. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, वी/488, पल्लीपुरम -679305 , पालघाट, केरल

681. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , बालामंदिरम्, पेन्नगाटरी , पालघाट-678506 , केरल 663. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय: कोयीलाण्डी, पिषारिकावु मंदिर परिसर , कोल्लम , कोयीलाण्डी, जिला कोषिकोड (केरल) -673035

682. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, पी. बी. 9 , पालक्काड रोड , ओट्‌टापालम -679101 , केरल 664. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , पी.ओ. अंबलपरा , पालक्काड -679512

683. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , पी. बी. 4 , हयात कांपलैक्स , पटांबी-679303 , पालघाट 665. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , 28/29, मुक्कत टावर्ज , बाईपास जंक्शन , आलुवा -683101

684. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , IV/605 , " मीरां " , पेरुंगोटुकुरिसी , पालघाट-678574 666. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, डोर नं. 9/378 , सी बाजार , चित्तूर , पालक्काड-678101

685. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, 8/497 , कैलाश, पुतियंकम, पालक्काड-678545 , केरल 667. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , पंचवदी काम्पलैक्स , पारली पी.ओ. , एडतरा , पालघाट-678612

686. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , कारूकापुत्तुर, चेषियाटरी पी.ओ. , तिरूमिट्टाकोड़ , पालक्काड-679535

687. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , पी. ओ. तिरूवेगापुरा , पालक्काड, केरल -679304 668. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , रास काम्पलैक्स, पी.ओ. काक्यूर , कोडुवायुर (वाया ) , पालक्काड

688. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , मेनका आर्केड , एस. ए. रोड, वैटिंला पी. ओ. , कोचीन-682019

669. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , डोर नं. 1/706, द्वारका, 12 स्ट्रीट , कलपाती- पालघाट; पालघाट-678003

689. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , अलवर ( राजभाषा कक्ष )

670. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, एस. एस. आई. शाखा , टाटा केलट्रान लि. के सामने , राजमार्ग रोड, कांजिकोड़ , पालघाट , केरल -678623

690. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय : सिद्धपुर , जिला: कांगड़ा (हिमाचल प्रदेश ) पिन-176057

671. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , 8/702 बीजू बिल्डिंग , कझानी चुंगम, कावसेरी -678543 , पालघाट , केरल

672. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, पी. ओ किनासेरी , पालघाट-678707, केरल

691. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय : मारण्डा, जिला: कांगड़ा ( हिमाचल प्रदेश ) 176102

673. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , " रोशनी " , कोट्टकोड पी. ओ. पालघाट-678732 , केरल

692. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, शाखा कार्यालय : अनुगुल , आमलापाडा, प्रथम लाइन , कंचन सिनेमा रोड , ओडिशा-759122

पी. बी. 11 , पालघाट रोड , कुल्लापुल्ली , 679122 674. पंजाब सेशनल बैंक, पालघार्द , केरल

693. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय : बारबिल, स्टेशन रोड , मटकमबेडा, जिला : क्योझार , ओडिशा-758035

675. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक, 3/605, वेंकटेशा निवास , कुतनूर , 678721 पालघाद , केरल

694. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय : बारीपदा, केएमबीएम साही , वार्ड नम्बर -5 , डाकखाना- बारीपदा, जिला : मयूर भंज, ओडिशा -757001

676. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , पोस्ट बक्स सं. 4 , एस आर टी काम्पलैक्स , पोल्लाची रोड , कोल्लनगाड़ -678506 पालघाट , केरल

677. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , पादूर रोड , मन्नपरा , पालघाट-678685 , केरल

695. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय : दुबरी , वाया बरगुडिया , डाकखाना-बरगुडिया, जिला : जाजपुर, ओडिशा-755044 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

696. पंजाब नेशनल बैंक , शाखा कार्यालय , एस.डी. पब्लिक स्कूल , जगाधरी , जिला : यमुनानगर (हरियाणा)

युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लि.

697. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड, शाखा कार्यालय- III , अम्बाथाडी , जयपुर

698. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड , मण्डल कार्यालय, एस.बी.बी.जे. के सामने , लोह्मगल रोड, अजमेर

4373

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

714. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड, शाखा कार्यालय , जय शिव चौक, स्टेशन रोड, मकराना-341505

715. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड, डाइरेक्ट ऐजेन्ट ब्रांच , कॉफी हाउस के सामने , खादीधर के ऊपर, एमआई रोड , जयपुर

716. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड, शाखा कार्यालय-प्रथम, जागिड भवन , एमआई,रोड, जयपुर

नेशनल इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड

699. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड , शाखा कार्यालय , गौरी कुंज, राजनगर रोड, कांकरोली 700. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड, शाखा कार्यालय , बडवाली हवेली , सुभाष बाजार, टोंक (राजस्थान)

701. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड, मण्डलीय कार्यालय, II , 24 डी.ई.एफ. , अश्विनी बाजार , उदयपुर

702. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड, शाखा कार्यालय , म.का. मुम्हरे गेट, 1 नुमाईश रोड , भरतपुर

703. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड , शाखा कार्यालय , " यालेचा मेंशन " , स्टेडियम के सामने , सांगानेर (जयपुर) -303902

717. नेशनल इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड , शाखा कार्यालय , गजरौला , अलीपुर चौपला , गजरौला 718. नेशनल इंश्योरेंस कंससी लिमिटेड,

क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , देहरादून , 56 , राजपुर रोड, देहरादून (Department ofFinancial Services) New Delhi , the 28th July, 2008

S.O. 2144.-In pursuane of sub -rule (4) of rule 10 ofthe official Languages (Use of official purposes of the Union) Rules , 1976 the Central Government, hereby, notifies the listed branches/ offices of the following Banks/ financial institutes in the attached armexare , more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.

S.No.

Number ofBranches/ Offices Name ofthe Bank/ Financial Institutes

352 1. StateBank ofHyderabad

2.

19 State Bank of Travancore

92 3. State Bank ofPatiala

704. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड , शाखा कार्यालय , बी-104 ( ए) , गणपति प्लाजा, फूलबाग , भिवाडी-अलवर

52 4. Central Bank of India

14 5. SyndicateBank

705. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड, शाखा कार्यालय , धूलकोट, धौलपुर ( राजस्थान )

47 6. Union Bank of India

7.

United Bank ofIndia

706. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड , शाखा- पंचम, शाखा कार्यालय -5 , जोधपुर

46

06 8. Oriental Bank of Commerce

02 9. Reserve Bank of India

07 10. IndianBank

707. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड , मण्डल कार्यालय , पंचशती सर्किल , शार्दुलगंज , बीकानेर-334003

06 11. Central Bank of India

53 12. Punjab Bank of India

708. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड , सी-97, कल्याण विला, सुभाष मार्ग, सी- स्कीम , जयपुर 709. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड, शाखा कार्यालय- प्रथम , शास्त्री सर्किल के पास , उदयपुर ( राजस्थान)

13 . United India Insurance Co. Ltd. 20

02 14. National Insurance Co. Ltd.

718 Total

[F. No. 11016/4/2008 -Hindi ] REMESH BABU ANIYERY, Jt. Director (OL) State Bank of Hyderabad

710. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड, शाखा कार्यालय, आलोक सिनेमा के पास , चूरु 711. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड, शाखा कार्यालय , कुशल बाग , बांसवाड़ा-327001 1. State Bank ofHyderabad , A.C.C-Mancherial Branch , Mancherial , A.C.C- Mancherial-504206 , AdilabadDistrict,

Andhra Pradesh

712. युनाइटेड इंडिका इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड , शाखा कार्यालय , फोर्ट रोड, नागौर

713. युनाइटेड इंडिया इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लिमिटेड, शाखा कार्यालय, शास्त्री मार्ग , डूंगरपुर (राजस्थान) -314001-

2 State Bank ofblydesabad,

Abdullapur Branch, Post Basar, Abdullapur- 504101 , AdilabadDistrict,

Andhra Pradosh.

4374

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/SRAVANA 18 , 1930

3. State Bank ofHyderabad, ADA Branch, Asifabad Mandal , ADA- 504293 Adilabad District , Andhra Pradesh

19. State Bank of Hyderabad, Chityal (Adilabad ) Branch , Gram Panchayat Samiti , Building Chityal-504306 Adilabad District, Andhra Pradesh .

4. State Bank of Hyderabad , Adilabad- Main Branch , Main Road Adilabad- 504001 , Adilabad District, Anshra Pradesh .

5.

20. State Bank of Hyderabad , Chowrastha -Hanamkondą Branch , Jeevanlal Complex Hanamkonda- 506011 , Warangal District , Andhra Pradesh .

State Bank ofHyderabad, Ashok Nagar Branch 6-3-317 , Peddapally Cross Road, Karimnagar - 505001 , Karimnagar District, Andhra Pradesh .

6.

21. State Bank of Hyderabad , Church Road- Khammam Branch , D.No.7-2-286, Vijaya Complex, Khammam. - 507003, Khammam District , Andhra Pradesh .

State Bank ofHyderabad , Asifabad Branch , Asifabad TQ , Asifabad -504293 Adilabad District, Andhra Pradesh .

7.

22. State Bank of Hyderabad , Collectorate Complex- Adilabad Branch , Adilabad , Adilabad-504002 , Adilabad District, Andhra Pradesh .

State Bank of Hyderabad, Aswapuram-Heavy Water PL Branch , Post Aswapuram, Mittagudem, Aswapurm - 507116 Khammam District , Andhra Pradesh .

8.

23. State Bank of Hyderabad, Collectorate Complex- Karimnagar Branch , Karimnagar , Karimnagar- $ 05001 , Karimnagar District , Andhra Pradesh .

State Bank ofHyderabad, Aswaropet Branch , H.No. 10-91 , Near Police Station , Aswaraopet - 507301 Khamam District , Andhra Pradesh

9

24. State Bank of Hyderabad, CourtComplex - Karimnagar Branch Court Complex. Jagtial Road, Court Complex-Karimnagar - 505001 , Karimnagar District , Andhra Pradesh.

State Bank of Hyderabad , Bellampalli Branch, Bellampally Bazar, Bellampalli- 504251 , Adilabad District, Andhra Pradesh .

25. State Bank of Hyderabad, Dhammapet Branch , 3-14/ 1 , Opp : MRO Office Sathupally -507306, Khammam District , Andhra Pradesh .

10. State Bank of Hyderabad, Bhadrachalam Branch , Khamam District , Bhadrachalam - 507111 , Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh.

26. State Bank of Hyderabad , Dořnakal Branch , Dist . Warangal Dornakal - 506381 Warangal District , Andhra Pradesh.

11. State Bank ofHyderabad , Bhainsa Branch , Gunj , Mudhol Taluq Bhainsa-504103 , Adilabad District, Andhra Pradesh .

27. State Bank of Hyderabad , Dubbapally (Chelpur ) Branch , KTPP Campus, Bhoopalpally Road, Dubbapally ( Chelpur )-506169 Warangal District, Andhra Pradesh .

12. State Bank of Hyderabad , Bhimaraın (Adilabd Dt) Branch Via Mancherial , Chinnoor TQ Bhimram - 504204 Adilabad District , Andhra Pradesh .

28. State Bank of Hyderabad , Eturnagaram Branch , Eturnagaram - 506165 Warangal District Andhra Pradesh .

13. State Bank ofHyderabad Bhoopalpalli Branch , Palkal Mandal , Bhoopalpalli-. 506169, Warangal District , Andhra Pradesh .

14

29. State Bank of Hyderabad, Fertiliser City (GDK) Branch , Peddapalli , Godavarikhani - 505210 , Karimnagar District, Andhra Pradesh .

State Bank ofHyderabad,. Budhwarpet Branch , Govt . Jr. College , Nirmal , Budhwarpet 504 106 Adilabad , District , Andhra Pradesh.

30. StateBank ofHyderabad, Gambhirraopet Branch , Karimnagar District , Gambhirraopet- 505304, Karimnagar District, Andhra pradesh .

15. State Bank of Hyderabad , Burgampahad Branch 6-59 / 1 Opp. Police Station , Burgampahad- 507114 Khammam District , Andhra Pradesh.

31. State Bank ofHyderabad , Gandhi Chowk Branch , Khamrnam , Khammam- 507003 , Khammam District , Andhra Pradesh .

16. State Bank of Hyderabad , CCI Township Branch , Adilabad , Adilabad-504003 , Adilabad District , Andhra Pradesh .

32. State Bank of Hyderabad , Gangadhara Branch , Karimnagar District , Gangadhara- 505445, Karimnagar District , Andhra Pradesh.

17. State Bank of Hyderabad Cheriyal Branch , Jangaon Cheriyal - 506223 , Warangal District Andhra Pardesh .

33. State Bank of Hyderabad , Garimella Branch , Mancherial Mandal , Garimella- 504208 , Adilabad District , Andhra Pradesh .

18. State Bank ofHyderabad, Chinnor Branch , Adilabad District , Chinnor- 504 201 , Adilabad District , Andhra Pradesh .

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

34. State Bank of Hyderabad AreaHospital (SCCL) Branch , Ram Mandir Road, Godavarikhani -505209 , Karimnagar District, Andhra Pradesh .

35. State Bank of Hyderabad CentenaryColony-GDK Branch , SCCL Sector - IV, PannurVillage-505212 , Karimnagar District, Andhra Pradesh .

36. State Bank of Hyderabad GDK-Vittal Nagar Branch, SCCL Sector- II , Indira ColonyGodavarikhani -505214, Karimnagar District, Andhra Pradesh .

37. State Bank of Hyderabad

Ghanpur Branch, Warangal District, Ghanpur- 506143 Warangal District, Andhra Pradesh 38. State Bank of Hyderabad Godavarikhani (SCCL) Branch Bunglow Area, Rajiv Rahadari Godavarikhani (SCCL)-505209 Karimangar District Andhara Pradesh

39. State Bank of Hyderabad Golieti Branch, Rebanna Mandal , Golieti - 504292, Adilabad District, Andhra Pradesh.

40. State Bank ofHyderabad Gunjapaduga Branch, Via Manthani / Godavarikhani , Gunjapadugu- 505184 , Karimnagar District, Andhra Pradesh .

41. State Bank of Hyderabad Hanamakonda -Main Branch , Nakkalagutta, Hanamakonda- 506002, Warangal District, Andhra Pradesh .

42. State Bank of Hyderabad Huzurabad Branch , Karimnagar District, Huzurabad-505468, Karimnagar District, Andhra Pradesh.

43. State Bank of Hyderabad IchodaBranch, Boath TQ. , Ichoda-504307, Adilabad District, Andhra Pradesh.

44. State Bank ofHyderabad

Jagtial Branch , Karimnagar District, Jagtial - 505327 , Karimnagar District , Andhra Pradesh.

45. State Bank of Hyderabad. Jainoor Branch, Utnoor TQ. Jainoor -504313, Adilabad District , Andhra Pradesh .

46. State Bank of Hyderabad

Jallaram Branch, 8, Incline Colony Shopping Copl , Jallaram - 505211 , Karimnagar District Andhra Pradesh ..

47. State Bank of Hyderabad Jammikuntha Branch, Hazurabad TQ Jammikunta- 505122, Karimnagar District, Andhra Pradesh .

48. State Bank of Hyderabad

Janakpur Branch , Asifabad Mandal , Janakpur- 504293 , Adilabad District, Andhra Pradesh .

49. State Bank of Hyderabad Jangoan Branch, Bank Road, Jangoan -506167 , Warangal District, Andhra Pradesh.

4375

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

50. State Bank of Hyderabad Jannaram Branch , Jannaram Post, Jannaram Mandal, Janmaram -504205 , Adilabad District, Andhra Pradesh .

51. State Bank of Hyderabad Jillella Branch, 8-3-86 , Near Old Bus Stand, Sircilla- 505301 Karimnagar District , Andhra Pradesh.

52. State Bank of Hyderabad Jyothinagar Branch , Karimnagar Dist . Jyothinagar- 505215, Karimnagar District, Andhra Pradesh 53. State Bank of Hyderabad Jyothinagar (Chinmaya Vid Branch ), FCI X Road , Jyothinagar, Jyothinagar ( Chinmaya VID- 505215) Karimnagar District Andhra Pradesh.

54. State Bank of Hyderabad Kalavasrirampur Branch , Karimnagar District, Kalavasrirampur-505153 Karimnagar District, Andhra Pradesh .

55. State Bank of Hyderabad KallurBranch; H.No.3-44-2 , Main Road, Kallur, Khammam . 507209, Kallur- 507209 , Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh .

56. State Bank of Hyderabad Kalyani Khani Branch , 64-219 Ashok Complex , Kalyani Khaní - 504231 , Adilabad District , Andhra Pradesh.

57. State Bank of Hyderabad Kamanpur Branch, Peddapalli TQ. , Kamanpur- 505188 , Karimnagar District, Andhra Pradesh .

58. State Bank ofHyderabad Kamepally (Vutukuru ) Branch , Tallagudem , Mandal Kamepally, Kamepally (Vutukuru)-507122 Khammam District , Andhra Pradesh .

59. State Bank of Hyderabad Kanukula Branch , Mandal Sultanabad, Kanukula- 505185 Karimnagar District, Andhra Pradesh .

60. State Bank ofHyderabad Karepally Branch, TQ. Yellandu , Karepally- 507122, Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh .

61. State Bank ofHyderabad Karimnagar-Main Branch, H.No.4-1-289, State Bank Road, Karimnagar- 505001 , Karimnagar District Andhra Pradesh,

62. State Bank ofHyderabad

Karimnagar- Rampur Branch, Kothi 8-6-48 Ram Pur Karimnagar- 505001 , Karimnagar District, Andhra Pradesh

63. State Bank of Hyderabad Kasi Bugga Branch , 11-23-284, 1st Floor, R.M. Complex, Kasi Bugga-506002 , Warangal District, Andhra Pradesh .

64. State Bank ofHyderabad Kazipet Branch 1-3-111 / 115 , Ist , Floor , Main Road, Kazipet- 506003 , Warangal District, Andhra Pradesh.

65. State Bank of Hyderabad Kesamudram Branch , Warangal District , Kesamudram -506,112 Warangal , District, Andhra Pradesh .

4376

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 66. State Bank of Hyderabad

Khammam-Main Branch, Jubileepura, Khammam- 507008 , Khammam District , Andhra Pradesh .

82. State Bank of Hyderabad Metpally Branch , Karimnagar District, Metapally- 505325 , Karimnagar District , Andhra Pradesh .

67. State Bank of Hyderabad

83. State Bank of Hyderabad Metpally - ADB Branch , Karimnagar District , Metpally- 505325 , Karimnagar District , Andhra Pradesh.

Khamam-Pers . & Commercial Branch , Sankshema Bhavan (DRDA) , Buhanpuram, Khammam - 507001 , Khammam District , Andhra Pradesh .

68. State Bank of Hyderabad

84. State Bank of Hyderabad Mudhol Branch , Mudhole TQ, Mudhol- 504102, Adilabad District , Andhra Pradesh.

Khanapur Branch, Khanapur Mandal , Khanapur- 504203 , Adilabad District , Andhra Pradesh.

69. State Bank of Hyderabad

Koratla Branch , Karimnagar District, Koratla- 505326 , Karimnagar District, Andhra Pradesh

85. State Bank of Hyderabad Mulkanoor Branch , Bheemadevarapalli Mandal , Mulkanoor - 505471 , Karimnagar District, Andhra Pradesh .

70. State Bank of Hyderabad

86.

Kothagudem Branch , M.G. Road, Kothagudem- 507101 , Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh .

State Bank of Hyderabad Mutharam Branch , Mutharam P.O./Mandal , Mutharam- 505153 , Karimnagar District, Andhra Pradesh .

71. State Bank of Hyderabad

87. State Bank of Hyderabad Narnoor Branch , Namoor Mandal , Narnoor - 504329 , Adilabad District , Andhra Pradesh .

Kusumanchi ( Jeellacheruvu) Branch , 2-88 , Kusumanchi Mandal , Kusumanchi - 507170, Khammam District , Andhra Pradesh .

72. State Bank of Hyderabad

88. State Bank of Hyderabad Narsampet Branch , Warangal District, Narsampet- 506132 , Warangal District, Andhra Pradesh .

Lakshmi Nagar- Jangaon Branch, H.No.33-59 Swathantra Chowk , Lakshmi Nagar - Jangaon- 505209 , Karimnagar District Andhra Pradesh .

73. State Bank of Hyderabad

89. State Bank of Hyderabad Narsapur (G) (Adilabad Dt) Branch , Nirmal TQ. , Narsapur (G )-504104 , Adilabad District, Andhra Pradesh .

gram Lakshminagram Branch , Dummagudem Mandal , Lakshminagram - 507137 , Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh

74. State Bank of Hyderabad

90. State Bank of Hyderabad Nelakondapalli Branch , Trunk Road , Nelakondapalli - 507160 , Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh.

Lingapoor Branch , Kaddam Mandal , Khanapur TQ, Lingapoor - 504202, Adilabad District Andhra Pradesh.

75. State Bank of Hyderabad

91. State Bank of Hyderabad Nirmal Branch , Hotel Tirumala Premises , Nirmal- 504106 , Adilabad District , Andhra Pradesh .

Luxettipet Branch , Luxettipet Taluka, Luxettipet- 50421 $ , Adilabad District , Andhra Pradesh .

76. State Bank of Hyderabad

92. State Bank of Hyderabad Nit, Warangal Branch , Warangal , Warangal- 506004 , Warangal District , Andhra Pradesh .

Madhira Branch , Khamam District , Madhira- 507203, Khammam District , Andhra Pradesh

93. State Bank of Hyderabad P& SB Naspur Branch , Q/ 5 , C 79 & 80 , SCCHC , Naspur-504303 , Adilabad District, Andhra Pradesh.

77. State Bank of Hyderabad

Mancherial Branch , Gangareddy Road , Mancherial 504208 , Adilabad District , Andhra Pradesh.

94. State Bank of Hyderabad Parkal Branch , Bank Street , Parkal, Parkal-506164 , Warangal District , Andhra Pradesh .

78. State Bank of Hyderabad Mandamarri Branch , Mandamarry Branch ( Yapal) Mandamarri - 504231 , Adilabad District , Andhra Pradesh .

95. State Bank of Hyderabad Pedda Vangara Branch , Mandal Kodadandla, Pedda Vangara- 506317 , Warangal , District Andhra Pradesh .

79. State Bank of Hyderabad

96. State Bank of Hyderabad Peddapalli - ADB Branch , Bhoomnagar , Peddapalli- 505172, Karimnagar District , Andhra Pradesh .

Mankammathota Branch , No.7-1-256, Mankammathota-505002 , Karimnagar District , Andhra Pradesh .

80. State Bank ofHyderabad Manthani -ADB Branch , Manthani , Manthani- 505184, Karimnagar District , Andhra Pradesh .

97. State Bank of Hyderabad Pegadapalli Branch , Via Gollapalli P: O . , Mallial TQ, Pegadapalli - 505532 , Karimnagar District, Andhra Pradesh .

81. State Bank of Hyderabad Manuguru Branch, Khammam District, Manuguru- 507117, Khammam District , Andhra Pradesh .

98. State Bank of Hyderabad Pembi Branch , Khanapur TQ. , Pembi -504203 , Adilabad District , Andhra Pradesh .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

99. State Bank ofHyderabad Poitda-Bhadrachalan Branch , ITDA Complex, Bhadrachalam Po ITDA - Bhadrachalam -507111 Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh

100. State Bank ofHyderabad PostOfficeArea Branch , 9-4-142, Opp: Prakasham Stadium Kothagudem -507101 , Khammam District Andhra Pradesh

101. State Bank ofHyderabad RaiparthyBranch, P.O. Raiparthy/Mandal , Raiparthy- 506314, Warangal District Andhra Pradesh , 102. State Bank ofHyderabad Ramagundam, Branch , Karimnagar District , Ramagundam -505208 , Karim Nagar, DistrictAndhra Pradesh

103. State Bank of Hyderabad Ramakrishanapuram Branch, B. Zone Centre. , Rajiv Chowk, Ramakrishanapuram- 504301 , Adilabad District , Andhra Pradesh

104. State Bank ofHyderabad RekapalliBranch , Mandal V.R. Puram, Rekapalli- 507135 , Khammam District Andhra Pradesh 105. State Bank of Hyderabad

RotaryNagar -Khammam Branch , Ward No. 7, Dr. No. 5-1-19/1 , Khammam -507002 , Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh

106. State Bank ofHyderabad Rudrampur Branch, Qutr No. B. Chummari No: 1, Rudrampur- 507118 , Khammam District Andhra Pradesh

107. State Bank of Hyderabad SME-Mancherial Branch, H. No. 8-401 , Main Road, Mancherial- 504208 , Adilabad District, Andhra Pradesh

108. State Bank ofHyderabad Sarangapur (Adilabad Dt) Branch, Adilabad District, Sarangapur- 504113 , AdilabadDistrict, Andhra Pradesh

109. State Bank ofHyderabad Sathupalli Branch, Main Road, Sathupalli Sathupalli - 507303, Khammam District Andhra Pradesh

110. State Bank ofHyderabad Sathupalli -ADB Branch, Khammam District, Sathupalli -507303 , Khammam District Andhra Pradesh

111. State Bank Of Hyderabad Sathyanarayanapuram Branch , Taluq Wugur , Sathyanarayanapuram- 507140, Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh

112. State Bank OfHyderabad ServiceBr. -Karimnagar Branch , H. No. 3-5-20, Doctor's Street, Service Br. -Karimnagar-505001 Karim Nagar District, Andhra Pradesh

113 State Bank of Hyderabad Service Br. Khammam Branch, Jublipura Trunk Road, Khammam - 507001 , Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh

4377

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

114. State Bank ofHyderabad ServiceBr. Warangal Branch , JPN Road, Warangal -506001 , Warangal District, Andhra Pradesh

115. State Bank ofHyderabad Siil-PalonchaBranch, Sill Campus , Paloncha. 507154, Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh 116. StateBank ofHyderabad SircillaBranch, Karimnagar District Sircilla-505301 , Karimnagar District, Andhra Pradesh

117. State Bank of Hyderabad Siripuram (Khammam Dt) , Branch 1-854, Over Over Bridge, Wyra Road Madhira-507203, Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh

118. State Bank ofHyderabad Sirpur-KagaznagarBranch Sirpur Tq, Sirpur - Kagaznagar - 504296, Adilabad District Andhra Pradesh

119. State Bank ofHyderabad SME Branch- Khammam Branch No.11-2-16 Το 19, Wyra Road, Khammam- 507001 Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh

120. State Bank ofHyderabad SMEBranch -Warangal Branch , No. 16-10-518/ 1 , UnderBridgeRoad, Warangal - 506002 , Wararigal District, Andhra Pradesh

121. State Bank ofHyderabad SrirampurBranch, Main Road, Srirampur, Srirampur-504208, Adilabad District, Andhra Pradesh

122. State Bank of Hyderabad SudimellaBranch , Yellandu, Sudimella-507123, Adllabad District , Andhra Pradesh

123. State Bank ofHyderabad Sultanabad Branch, Main Road, Peddapally Tq, Sultanabad-505185, Karim Nagar District, Andhra Pradesh

124. State Bank ofHyderabad ThalladaBranch , No.7-295, Thallada-507167 , Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh

125. State Bank of Hyderabad Thorrur Branch, Warangal District, Thorrur- 506163, Warangal District, Andhra Pradesh 126. State Bank of Hyderabad Timmapur Branch, L.M.D. Colony, Timmapur- 505527, Karim Nagar District, Andhra Pradesh 127. State Bank of Hyderabad Treasury Br. -Khammam Branch , Collectrate Complex, Khammam -507002, Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh

128. State Bank of Hyderabad Utnoor Branch, Via Luxettipet , Utnoor Tq, Utnoor- 504311 , Adilabad District, Andhra Pradesh 129. State Bank of Hyderabad Utoor Branch, Mona Kondur Mandal , Utoor- 505505 , Karimnagar Dist . , Andhra Pradesh 4378

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 /SRAVANA 18 , 1930

130. $ tate Bank of Hyderabad VM Banjar Branch, Penubally Post , V M Banjar- $07302, Khammam District , Andhra Pradesh

145. State Bank of Hyderabad Kachinapalli Branch, Gundala Mandal , Kachinapalli- 0 , Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh

131. $tate Bank Of Hyderabad

Vavilalapally Branch , 3-7-324 , Near Apseb Rest House, Vavilalapally-505001 , Karim Nagar District, Andhra Pradesh

146. State Bank of Hyderabad Adinath Commercial Complex , Shop Nos . 1,2 Bibvewadi , Pune - 411037

147. State Bank of Hyderabad

A-64, Gokuldham , Goregaon East, Mumbai -400063 132. State Bank of Hyderabad Velgatoor Branch , Mandal Velgatoor, Velgatoor- $05526, Karimnagar District , Andhra Pradesh

148. State Bank ofHyderabad Pranam Co -Operative Hsg. Society, Cheekuwadi , Borivali (W) , Mumbai - 400092

133. State Bank of Hyderabad VemulawadaBranch , Karimnagar District , Vemulawada- 505302 , KarimnagarDistrict, Andhra Pradesh

149. State Bank of Hyderabad Power Grid Campus , Ring Road, Nagpur -440026 134. State Bank of Hyderabad VenkatapuramBranch , Khammam District, Venkatapuram- 507136 , Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh

150. State Bank ofHyderabad Kharghar Branch , Ekta Avenue , Ground Floor , Plot No.C-94, Sector - 12 , Opp . Gokhale High School , Kharghar , New Mumbai - 410210

151. State Bank of Hyderabad 882, Ground Floor , East Park Road , Karol Bagh , New Delhi, Pin Code - 110005

135. State Bank of Hyderabad VilasSagar Branch, Vilasagar (Post ) , Bionpalli Tq , VilasSagar-505524 , Karimnagar District, Andhra Pradesh

152. State Bank ofHyderabad J- 13/4 Patel Market , Rajouri Garden, New Delhi , PinCode- 110027

136. State Bank of Hyderabad Wankidi Branch , Adilabad District , Wankidi- 504295,Adilabad District , Andhra Pradesh

153. State Bank of Hyderabad GA- 11 Raheja Square IMT Manesar , Dist . Gurgaon Haryana, Pin Code - 122050

137. State Bank of Hyderabad Warangal-Main Branch , J.P.N.Road , Warangal- 506002, Warangal District, Andhra Pradesh

154. State Bank of Hyderabad Krishna Tower, Sector - 12 , Dwarka, New Delhi Pin Code - 110075

138. State Bank of Hyderabad Wardhannapet Branch , Warangal District, Wardhannapet - 506313 , Warangal District , Andhra Pradesh

155. State Bank of Hyderabad P & SB Branch, K.G. Marg, New Delhi , PinCode-110011

139. State Bank of Hyderabad Wyra Branch , Main Road , Wyra-507165 , Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh

156. State Bank of Hyderabad Lucknow Branch , Spru Marg , 6- B SAS House , Hajrat Ganj , Lucknow, Pin Code- 226001

140. State Bank of Hyderabad

Aurangabad Branches

Yellandu Branch, Khammam District, Yellandu- 507 123 , Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh

157. State Bank of Hyderabad , Service Branch , Aurangabad Pin- 431001

141. State Bank ofHyderabad Yerrampet Branch, Taluq Chintoor Mandal , Yerrampet-507126 , Khammam District , Andhra Pradesh

158. State Bank ofHyderabad , Ausa Road Branch , Latur, Pin - 413351

159. State Bank of Hyderabad , S. R. T. MedicalCollege Branch , Ambajogai , Pin-413517

14. State Bank of Hyderabad Zilla Parishad -Khammam Branch , Wyra Road, Khammam- 507002, Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh

43. State Bank of Hyderabad

160. State Bank of Hyderabad , Yetala Branch, Nanded District, Maharashtra

Karim Nagar Regional Office, Branch H.No.4-1- 289, State Bank Road, Karimnagar - 505001 Karim Nagar District, Andhra Pradesh

161. State Bank of Hyderabad , Walsavangi Branch , Jalna District , Pin -431112 , Maharashtra

162. State Bank of Hyderabad, ADB Medak , Andhra Pradesh - 502110

144 State Bank of Hyderabad Mancherial Regional Office Branch , Gangareddy Road, Mancherial - 504208 , Adilabad District , Andhra Pradesh 4379

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9, 2008/ श्रवण 18 , 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

163. State Bank ofHyderabad, APHB Kukatpally, Rangareddy Andhra Pradesh -500872 .

164. StateBank ofHyderabad, Budvel , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh -500030 165. State Bank ofHyderabad, Chengannur , Alleppey , Kerala-689124

166. State Bank ofHyderabad , Chetput, Chennai , Tamilnadu-600031

167. State Bank of Hyderabad,

Dharur, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh-501121 168. State Bank of Hyderabad,

AirCargo, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh-500016 169. State Bank of Hyderabad, Arutla, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh -501508 170. State Bank of Hyderabad, CAC-Chennai , Chennai ,Tamilnadu -600001 171. State Bank ofHyderabad, Chengumal, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh-501501 172. State Bank ofHyderabad, Chevella, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh- 501503 173. State Bank of Hyderabad , Doma, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh- 501502 174. State Bank of Hyderabad , Alakapuri , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh- 500035 175. State Bank of Hyderabad,. Basheerabad, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh -501143 176. State Bank of Hyderabad, CAC-(Secbad) Hyderabad , Andhra Pradesh-500003 177. State Bank of Hyderabad, Chennai -Main, Chennai , Tamilnadu -600001 178. State Bank of Hyderabad, Coimbatore, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu-640018 179. State Bank of Hyderabad, Dubbak, Medak, Andhra Pradesh-502208 180. State Bank ofHyderabad, Aloor, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh- 501503 181. State Bank of Hyderabad, Begumpet, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh-500016 182. State Bank of Hyderabad , Calicut, Kerala-673004

183. State Bank ofHyderabad, Chennai , Thousand Lights , Chennai, TamilNadu-600014

184. StateBank ofHyderabad, commercial Branch Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh - 500003

185. State Bank ofHyderabad , Eddumailaram, Medak, Andhra Pradesh-502205 186. State Bank ofHyderabad, Gajwel , Medak, Andhra Pradesh- 502278 187. State Bank ofHyderabad, Hatnoora, Medak, Andhra Pradesh -502296 188. State Bank ofHyderabad,

2823 GI/08-5

ICSA-Egmore ,Chennai , Tamilnadu 600008 189. State Bank of Hyderabad, JNTU, CampusRangareddy, Andhra Pradesh-500072 190. State Bank of Hyderabad, Karankote-CCI, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh-501158

191. State Bank of Hyderabad, Kovaipudur, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu-641042 192. State Bank ofHyderabad, Ganded, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh- 509341 193. State Bank ofHyderabad, Himmatnagar, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh-500264 194. State Bank ofHyderabad, IDPL Colony, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh -500037 195. State Bank of Hyderabad, Jogipet, Medak, Andhra Pradesh- 502270 196. State Bank ofHyderabad, Keesara, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh -501301 197. State Bank of Hyderabad, Koyambedu, Chennai , Tamilnadu-600107 198. StateBank ofHyderabad, General Bazar, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh-500003 199. State Bank of Hyderabad, I.E.Medchal , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh-501401 200. State Bank ofHyderabad , IndiraNagar, Chennai , Tamil Nadu -600020 201. State Bank ofHyderabad, KakatiyaNagar, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh -500008

202. State Bank of Hyderabad, Kodakandla , Medak, Andhra Pradesh-502312 203. State Bank ofHyderabad, Kulakcherla, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh-509335 204. StateBank ofHyderabad, Ghatkesar, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh- 501301 205. State Bank of Hyderabad, Ibrahimpatnam , Rangareddy, b AndhraPradesh-501506

206. State Bank of Hyderabad, Ismailkhanpet, Medak, Andhra Pradesh-502296 207. State Bank of Hyderabad, Kandukur , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh -509351 208. State Bank ofHyderabad, Kohir , Medak, Andhra Pradesh-502210

209. State Bank ofHyderabad , Kushaiguda, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh -500062 210. State Bank of Hyderabad, M.C. Koyambedu , Chennai , Tamil Nadu - 600092 211. State Bank ofHyderabad, Marpallykalan, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh-501202 212. State Bank ofHyderabad, Moinabad, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh-501518 213. State Bank of Hyderabad , Mylargadda, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh-500025 4380

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

238. State Bank of Hyderabad , Shankarampet , Medak, Andhra Pradesh - 502271 214. State Bank of Hyderabad , New Bhoiguda, Hyderabad , AndhraPradesh- 500003

239. State Bank of Hyderabad , SMECCC , Secunderabad , Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh - 500003

215. State Bank ofHyderabad, PIN. Pudur , Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu - 641041

216. State Bank of Hyderabad , Madurai , Tamil Nadu -625001

240. State Bank of Hyderabad , Prashanth Nagar, Rangareddy , Andhra Pradesh - 500040

217. State Bank of Hyderabad , Medak Main, Medak, Andhra Pradesh - 502110

241. State Bank of Hyderabad , Rajendranagar , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh - 500030

218. State Bank ofHyderabad , Moula-Ali , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh - 500040

242. State Bank of Hyderabad, Sadasiupet , Medak, Andhra Pradesh - 502291 219. State Bank ofHyderabad , Nagasamunder, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh -501107.

243. State Bank of Hyderabad , Saroor Nagar , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh - 500060

220. State Bank of Hyderabad , Nird, Rangareddy , Andhra Pradesh -500030

244. State Bank of Hyderabad , Shankarapally , Rangareddy, Tamil Nadu

221. State Bank of Hyderabad, Pargi ADB , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh - 501501

245. State Bank of Hyderabad , Solur, Vellore, Tamil Nadu -635814

222. State Bank ofHyderabad , Maheswaram, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh - 509359

246. State Bank of Hyderabad , Pudur, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh - 501101 223. State Bank of Hyderabad, Medchal Main , Rangareddy , Andhra Pradesh - 501401

247. State Bank of Hyderabad, Ramanthapur , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh -500013

224. State Bank of Hyderabad, MountRoad, Chennai , Tamil Nadu - 600035

248. State Bank of Hyderabad , Salem, Tamil Nadu - 636001

225. State Bank of Hyderabad, Narayankhed , Medak, Andhra Pradesh - 502286

249. State Bank of Hyderabad, Service Branch , Chennai , Tamil Nadu - 600014 226. State Bank of Hyderabad, Nizampet , Rangareddy , Andhra Pradesh- 500072

250. State Bank of Hyderabad , Shivarampally, Rangareddy, Tamil Nadu - 500252 227. State Bank ofHyderabad, Pargi Main , Rangareddy , Andhra Pradesh - 501501 251. State Bank of Hyderabad , SSI - Cherlapally , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh - 500051

228. State Bank ofHyderabad, Malkapur, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh -501157

252. State Bank of Hyderabad , R.C. Puram , Medak , Andhra Pradesh - 500032 229. State Bank of Hyderabad , Miarkhanpet, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh -501509

253. State Bank of Hyderabad , Ramayampet, Medak, Andhra Pradesh- 502101 230. State Bank of Hyderabad , MPSF ZOS, Hyderabad , Andhra Pradesh- 500003

231. State Bank of Hyderabad, Narsapur, Medak , Andhra Pradesh - 502313

254. State Bank of Hyderabad , Sangareddy, Medak , Andhra Pradesh -502001 255. State Bank of Hyderabad , Shabad , Rangareddy , Andhra Pradesh - 509217 232. State Bank ofHyderabad , OldBowenpally, Rangareddy , AndhraPradesh-500011

256. State Bank of Hyderabad , Siddipet, Medak , Andhra Pradesh - 502103

233. State Bank of Hyderabad , Patloor , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh - 501202

257. State Bank of Hyderabad , T. Nagar, Chennai , Tamil Nadu - 600017

234. State Bank of Hyderabad , Porur, Thiruvalla, Kerala-6001 16

258. State Bank of Hyderabad , Tandur Main , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh - 501141

235. State Bank ofHyderabad, Raidurg, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh - 500008

259. State Bank of Hyderabad , Uppal , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh -500039 236. State Bank of Hyderabad, RASECC, Chennai , Tamil Nadu -600035

260. State Bank of Hyderabad , Vennela, Ernakulam , Kerala - 682025

237. State Bank ofHyderabad , SardarNagar, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh - 509222

261. State Bank of Hyderabad , Yacharam , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh -501509 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

4381

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9, 2008/श्रावण 18 , 1930

262. State Bank of Hyderabad, Amirpet, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh -509325 263. State Barnk of Hyderabad Bowrampet, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh -500043 264. State Bank ofHyderabad, TFCPC, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh-500001 265. State Bank of Hyderabad, Valmiki Nagar , Chennai , Tamil Nadu-600041 266. State Bank ofHyderabad, Vikarabad, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh-501-101- 267. State Bank of Hyderabad, Yalal, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh - 501144 268. State Bank of Hyderabad, Cheriyal , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh- 501301 269. State Bank ofHyderabad, CPPC ZOS , Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh - 500003 270. State Bank ofHyderabad, Thumkunta, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh-500014 271. State Bank ofHyderabad, Vanasthalipuram, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh -500661

272. State Bank ofHyderabad, WestMarredpally, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh- 500026

273. State Bank of Hyderabad , Zaheerabad, Medak, Andhra Pradesh- 502220 274. State Bank of Hyderabad, Habsiguda, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh-500078 275. State Bank ofHyderabad , ICRISAT, Medak, Andhra Pradesh- 502319 276. State Bank ofHyderabad, Tiruvalla, Patanamthitta, Kerala-689107 277. State Bank ofHyderabad, Velacherry, Chennai , Tamil Nadu-600042 278. State Bank of Hyderabad, West Tambaram, Chennai , Tamil Nadu-600045 279. State Bank ofHyderabad, Kankal , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh- 501509 280. State Bank of Hyderabad, Kongarakalan, Rangareddy , Tamil Nadu -501510 281. State Bank ofHyderabad ,

L. B. Nagar , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh-500963 282. State Bank ofHyderabad, Chaitanyapuri , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh- 500060

283. State Bank of Hyderabad, Nawabpet, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh-501111 284. State Bank of Hyderabad, OSF-Chennai, Chennai , Tamil Nadu - 600001 285. State Bank ofHyderabad, Pondicherry, Pondicherry, Tamil Nadu -605011 286. State Bank ofHyderabad, Trivananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram , Kerala-695023

287. State Bank of Hyderabad, Ernakulam, Ernakulam, Kerala-682035

288. State Bank of Hyderabad, R.P. Road, Hyderabad , Andhra Pradesh - 500003 289. State Bank ofHyderabad, Rangampet, Medak, Andhra Pradesh -502381 290. State Bank of Hyderabad , SARC-ZOS , Hyderabad , Andhra Pradesh -500001 291. State Bank ofHyderabad, Shamshabad- SSI, Rangareddy, AndhraPradesh-500218

292. State Bank ofHyderabad, Jillellaguda, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh -500079 293. State Bank of Hyderabad, Venneched, Rangareddy, Arndhra Pradesh -509339 294. State Bank of Hyderabad , West-Malkajgiri, Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh-500047

295. State Bank ofHyderabad , Tandur ADB , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh - 501141

296. State Bank of Hyderabad, Marikal , Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh -509340 297. StateBank ofHyderabad, Mohammadabad ; Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh -501225

298. StateBank ofHyderabad; Mylapore, Chennai , Tamilnadu -600004

299. State Bank of Hyderabad, Sirgapur, Medak, Andhra Pradesh -502207

VISAKHAPATNAM ZONE REGION- I

300. State Bank of Hyderabad, M.V. Palem Branch, Dist. Visakhapatnam , Pincode-530019,8 Andhra Pradesh -500001

301. State Bank ofHyderabad, ChuchukondaBranch , Dist . Visakhapatnam, Pin code-531055 , Andhra Pradesh

302. State Bank of Hyderabad , Alamanda Branch , Dist . Visakhapatnam, Pin code-531030 , Andhra Pradeshi

303. State Bank of Hyderabad, M. C. Complex Branch, Dist., Visakhapatnam, Pin code-530020, Andhra Pradesh

304. State Bank ofHyderabad , Lawsonsbay Colony, Branch, Dist . Visakhapatnam , Pincode- 530017 , Andhra Pradesh

305. State Bank ofHyderabad P& SB Branch, Dist . Visakhapatnam , Pincode-530013 , Andhra Pradesh .

306. State Bank of Hyderabad , Deepanjalinagar Branch , Dist . Visakhapatnam , Pincode-531020 , Andhra Pradesh

1 307. State Bank of Hyderabad , P. M. Palem Branch , Dist. Visakhapatnam, Pin code - 530041 , Andhra Pradesh 4382

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/SRAVANA 18 , 1930

308. State Bank of Hyderabad , Dist. Court Complex Branch, Dist. Visakhapatnam , Pin code- 530002, Andhra Pradesh .

309. State Bank ofHyderabad, Akkayapalem Branch , Dist. Visakhapatnam , Pin code-530016 , Andhra Pradesh

310. State Bank of Hyderabad, SBITMarket Branch , Dist . Vizianagaram , Pin code-535003 , Andhra Pradesh

311. State Bank ofHyderabad , Parvathipuram Branch , Dist . Vizianagaram, Pin code-5355001 , Andhra Pradesh

312. State Bank of Hyderabad , NarasamnapetBranch , Dist . Srikakulam , Pincode-532421 , Andhra Pradesh

313. State Bank of Hyderabad, Berhampur Branch , Dist . Ganjam , Pin code-760005 , Orissa

Region- II

314. State Bank of Hyderabad , RegionalOffice, Vijayawada, Pin code-520003 , Andhra Pradesh

315. State Bank of Hyderabad , GandhinagarBranch, Dist . Krishna, Pincode- 520003 , Andhra Pradesh

316. State Bank of Hyderabad , CivilCourts Branch , Dist . Krishna , Pincode - 520002 , Andhra Pradesh

317. State Bank of Hyderabad, Patamatalanka Branch , Dist . Krishna, Pincode-520010, Andhra Pradesh

318. State Bank of Hyderabad , SC Railway Branch , Vijayawada, Dist . Krishna , Pincode-520001 , Andhra Pradesh

319. State Bank of Hyderabad, ; Chittinagar Branch , Dist . Krishna, Pincode- 520009 , Andhra Pradesh

320. State Bank of Hyderabad, Service Branch , Dist. Krishna , Pincode-520002 , Andhra Pradesh

321. State Bank of Hyderabad,. Mogalrajpuram Branch, Dist. Krishna , Pincode-520010 , Andhra Pradesh

322. State Bank of Hyderabad, Jaggayyapet Branch , Dist . Krishna , Pincode- 521175 , Andhra Pradesh

323. State Bank of Hyderabad , Gudivada Branch, Dist . Krishna, Pincode-521301 , Andhra Pradesh

324. State Bank of Hyderabad , Machilipatnam Branch , Dist. Krishna , Pin code-521001 , Andhra Pradesh

325. State Bank of Hyderabad , Mudunuru Branch , Dist. Krishna, Pincode- 521261 , Andhra Pradesh

326. State Bank of Hyderabad , 1 Nuzvid Branch , Dist . Krishna , Pincode- 521201 , Andhra Pradesh

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 327. State Bank of Hyderabad , Krishnalanka Branch , Dist. Krishna, Pin code-520013 , Andhra Pradesh

328. State Bank of Hyderabad , Chandramouli Nagar Branch , Dist . Guntur , Pincode - 522007 , Andhra Pradesh

329. State Bank of Hyderabad, Rompicherla Branch , Dist.Guntur, Pincode - 522615 , Andhra Pradesh

330. State Bank of Hyderabad, Gummanampadu Branch , Dist . Guntur, Pincode-522614 , Andhra Pradesh

331. State Bank of Hyderabad , Ongole Branch, Dist . Prakasam , Pincode- 523001 , Andhra Pradesh

332. State Bank of Hyderabad , Kurnool Road Branch , Dist. Prakasam , Pincode- 523002 , Andhra Pradesh

333. State Bank of Hyderabad, Chirala Branch , Dist . Prakasam , Pincode- 523155 , Andhra Pradesh

334. State Bank of Hyderabad , Inkollu Branch , Dist . Prakasam, Pincode - 523167 , Andhra Pradesh

335. State Bank ofHyderabad , Dhupadu Branch , Dist . Prakasam , Pincode- 523330 , Andhra Pradesh

336. State Bank of Hyderabad , Kandukuru Branch , Dist . Prakasam Pincode-523105 , Andhra Pradesh

337. State Bank of Hyderabad , Tanguturu Branch , Dist . Prakasam , Pincode- 523274, Andhra Pradesh REGION-III

338. State Bank of Hyderabad , Kakinada Branch , Dist . East Godavari , Pin code - 533001 , Andhra Pradesh

339. State Bank of Hyderabad, Kakinada- 3rd Battallion Branch , Dist. East Godavari , Pin code - 533005, Andhra Pradesh

340. State Bank of Hyderabad , Kakinada-Sarpavaram Branch , Dist . East Godavari , Pincode-533005, Andhra Pradesh

341. State Bank of Hyderabad , Kakinada - Zilla Parishad Branch , Dist . East Godavari , Pincode- 533004, Andhra Pradesh 342. State Bank of Hyderabad, Kesanakurru Branch , Dist, East Godavari , Pincode- 533220 , Andhra Pradesh

343. State Bank of Hyderabad, Machavaram Branch , Dist , East Godavari , Pin code- 533214 , Andhra Pradesh

344. State Bank of Hyderabad, Rajahmundry Branch , Dist . East Godavari , Pincode- 533001 , Andhra Pradesh [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

4383

भारत का राजपत्रः अगस्त 9 , 2008/श्रावण 18 , 1930

345. State Bank of Hyderabad, Rajahmundry-Kotagummam Branch, Dist. EastGodavari , Pin code-533001 , Andhra Pradesh

346. StateBank ofHyderabad , Rajahmundry-MGWCM Branch, Dist. EastGodavari , Pin code-533103 , Andhra Pradesh

347. State Bank ofHyderabad , Ravulapalem Branch, Dist . East Godavari, Pin code -533238 , Andhra Pradesh

348. State Bank of Hyderabad, Rayavaram Branch , Dist. East Godavari , Pin code-533346 , Andhra Pradesh

349. State Bank ofHyderabad, Razole Branch, Dist. East Godavari, Pincode-533242, Andhra Pradesh

350. State Bank ofHyderabad, MandapetaBranch , Dist. East Godavari , Pin code-533308 , Andhra Pradesh

351. State Bank of Hyderabad, Eluru Branch, Dist. West Godavari , Pincode -534001 , Andhra Pradesh

352. State Bank ofHyderabad, Jangareddygudem Branch , Dist. West Godavari , Pincode-534447, Andhra Pradesh-

State Bank of Travancore

353. State Bank ofTravancore, Regional Office , S.B.T. House 18/4 , Arya Samaj Road, 3rdFloor, Karol Bagh , New Delhi-05 Phone:28751648-52, Fax: 28751651 E-mail dgmdelhi@sbt. co. in

354. State Bank ofTravancore, Maruti Udyog Ltd. (Gurgaon) , P.B. No. 9, Palam Gurgaon Road,Gurgaon-P.O. Gurgaon, Haryana- 122015

355. State Bank ofTravancore, DLF Phase IV Gurgaon; SG No. 106, Galleria Mall, DLF Phase IV, Gurgaon, Haryana, Gurgaon Haryana - 122009

356. StateBank ofTravancore, Sector- 18 -Gurgaon , Ground Floor, Udyog Minar Income Tax Building, Udyog Vihar , Phase V, Gurgaon, Haryana, Gurgaon Haryana -122016 357. State Bank of Travancore , Sector, 8, Rohini Branch -New Delhi P.B. No. 10005, Balaji Plaza, Sector - 8 , Pocket C-9 , Rohini, NewDelhi - 110085

358. State Bank ofTravancore, Noida. P.B. No. 53 , Sector 18 , J 1 &2 Block, Noida P.O. Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh -201301 359. State Bank of Travancore, Karol Bagh-New Delhi, P.B. No. 2651, SCT House, 18/4, Arya Samaj Road, Karol Bagh P.Q. New Delhi Delhi-110005

360. State Bank ofTravancore, Swaroop Nagar -Kanpur , I Floor , Nadri Complex, Swaroop Nagar P.O. , Kanpur , Uttar Pradesh -208002

361. State Bank of Travancore, Jaipur-MI road, Ist Floor, P.B. No. 354, Shyam Anukampa, Ashok Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur , Rajasthan-302001

362. State Bank of Travancore , Chandigarh, SCO No. 206-207, Sub City Centre, Sector 34-A, Chandigarh , Chandigarh- 160022

363. State Bank ofTravancore , ARMBrancBranch-New Delhi , P. P.B. No. 2658 , 18/4 Arya Samaj Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi, Delhi- 110005 364. State Bank of Travancore , Lucknow-Aliganj , Sector -F Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj , Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh-226020 365. State Bank of Travancore, Parliament Street- New Delhi , Gate No. 4A, ' Jeevan Tara'Building 5, Parliament Street, NewDelhi , Delhi-110070

366. State Bank of Travarnicore, R.K. Puram-New Delhi, P.B. No. 4 , 1st Floor , Ansal Chambers , Bhikaji Cama Place , Ramakrishnapuram main P.O. New Dehli , Delhi - 110066

367. State Bank of Travancore, SarojiniNagar (New Delhi) , P.B. No, 4832, Vinay Nagar, Bengali Senior Sec . School , Sarojini Nagar P.O. New Delhi , Delhi- 110023

368. State Bank of Travancore , ServiceBranch- New Delhi , M- 127, 2nd Floor , Outer Circle, Connaught Circus , New Delhi , Delhi- 110001

369. State Bank ofTravancore, TilakNagar-New Delhi , WZ 112C, Meenakshi Garden, Main Najafgarh Raod, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi-110018

370. State Bank of Travancore , Commercial Branch -New Delhi, Travancore House , Kasturba Gandhi Marg , New Delhi , Delhi - 110001 371. State Bank of Travancore , : Mayur Vihar, 1st Floor , Sachdeva Plaza II , Mayur Vihar Phase II , Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi - 110091 State Bank of Patiala

372. State Bank ofPatiala, Sector-7, Panchkula , Distt . Panchkula, (Haryana)-134109

373. State Bank of Patiala, Panipat SSI . GT Road , Panipat (Haryana) 374. State Bank of Patiala, ClothMarket, Ambala City CM, Ambala (Haryana)- 134002

375. State Bank ofPatiala, AmbalaCityGT Raod, H No. 2128-29, Block No. 2 Sapatu Road (Haryana)-134002

376. State Bank ofPatiala, AmbalaCantt(Sadar Bazar) (Haryana)-133001 377. State Bank ofPatiala, HousingBoard Colony, 238, Rambag Road, Ambala Cantt (Haryana)-133001

378. State Bank ofPatiala, SA Jain College, Amabala (Haryaria) 4384

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

379. State Bank of Patiala, AryaGirls College, Ambala Cantt (Haryana) 380. State Bank of Patiala, Dhulkot, Ambala City, Chandigarh Road , Ambala (Haryana)

381. State Bank of Patiala, Hudda, Sector,-9, Ambala City ( Haryana) 134003 382. State Bank of Patiala , Grain Market Kalyat , Tehsil Narwana, Distt Kaithal (Haryana) 126117

383. State Bank ofPatiala ,

Distt Kaithal (Haryana) 132027

384. State Bank of Patiala ,

Ramthali Distt . , Kaithal ( Haryana)

385. State Bank of Patiala ,

Kurar Teb Narwana, Distt. , Kaithal ( Haryana) 386. State Bank of Patiala ,

Guhla Chika PO Chika, Distt Kurkshetra (Haryana) 132034

387. State Bank of Patiala, Pehowa Tehsil PO Pehowa , Teh . Pehowa Distt. Kurkshetra, (Haryana) 132128

388. State Bank of Patiala , Kurkshetra , Distt Kurkshetra ( Haryana) 132118 389 State Bank of Patiala , Shahbad Markanda, Distt. Kurkshetra (Haryana) 132135

390, State Bank of Patiala , Thanesar (Arya High School ) . Distt . Kurkshetra (Haryana) 132118

391 State Bank of Patiala , Ladwa(Near Civil Hospital Road) , Distt . Kurkshetra (Haryana) 136132

392 State Bank of Patiala ,

Kalka , Distt. Panchkula , ( Haryana)

393 State Bank of Patiala ,

Chandi Mandir, Teh . Kalka , Distt . Panchkula , (Haryana)

394 State Bank of Patiala, Kalka NRW, Distt . Panchkula , (Haryana) 395 State Bank of Patiala, Sec- 6 Panchkula , Personal Banking Branch , Distt. Panchkula (Haryana) 134109

396. State Bank of Patiala ,

Sec - 12 , SCO- 80, Punchkula , Distt . Panchkula , (Haryana)

397. State Bank of Patiala, Sugar Mill Area, PB No. 40 , Yamuna Nagar (Haryana) 135001

398. State Bank of Patiala , Yamuna Nagar (Haryana) 135001

399. State Bank of Patiala , Industrial Area, Yamuna Nagar (Haryana ) 135001 400. State Bank of Patiala , VPO Mustafabad , Distt. Yamuna Nagar , (Haryana) 133102

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)) 401. State Bank of Patiala , ADB Jagadhri , Distt . Yamuna Nagar (Haryana) 135003

402. State Bank of Patiala , ADB Kaithal , Distt . Kaithal , (Haryana)-132027 403. State Bank of Patiala , Ramgarh Teh . Kalka , Distt . Yamuna Nagar (Haryana)-140202

404. State Bank of Patiala , Jagadhri , North Railway Workshop , Distt . Yamuan (Haryana)-135002

405. State Bank of Patiala, Saint Guru Nanak Khalsa High School , Jagadhri , Distt. Yamuna Nagar, (Haryana )-135002 406. State Bank of Patiala , Yamuna Nagar ( SSI ) , Distt. Yamuna Nagar, (Haryana) -135001

407. State Bank of Patiala , GNGC, Sant pura, Yamuna Nagar, ( Haryana) 408. State Bank of Patiala , Bilaspur, Distt. Yamuna Nagar, (Haryana) 409. State Bank of Patiala , Mini Secretariat , Jagadhri , Distt . Yamuna Nagar , (Haryana) -135001

410. State Bank of Patiala ,

Jind , Teh . & Distt . Jind ( Haryana )-126102 411. State Bank of Patiala , Jind (Patiala Chowk) (Haryana)-126102

412. State Bank of Patiala , Mini Secretariat Area, 10 Housing Board Colony, Jind (Haryana )-126102

413. State Bank of Patiala , Dumer Khan Kalan , the Narwana, Distt . Jind (Haryana)-126116

414. State Bank of Patiala ,

Karsindhu , Teh . & Distt. Jind ( Haryana) -126015 415. State Bank of Patiala, DRDA, Jind (Haryana)-126102

416. State Bank of Patiala , Rly Road Karnal (Main) , (Haryana) 132001 417. State Bank of Patiala , Gharonda (GT Road ) , Teh . & Distt . Karnal (Haryana)-132114

418. State Bank of Patiala , NDRI Karnal , Distt. Karnal (Haryana )-132001 419. State Bank of Patiala , Asandh, Distt. Karnal ( Haryana) -132009 420. State Bank of Patiala , Bawana, VPO Buana Lakhu , Distt . Karnal , (Haryana)-132141

421. State Bank of Patiala , UrbanEstate, Sec- 13 Karnal (Haryana)-132001 422. State Bank of Patiala , Mahaudin Pur, Teh . & Distt . , Karnal (Haryana ) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

423. State Bank of Patiala , Daval Singh College, Karnal , Distt. , Karnal (Haryana)-132001

424. State Bank ofPatiala , Urban Estate Sec-6 , Karnal ( Haryana)

425. State Bank of Patiala , G-40, School -cum - Karnal Area, Nilokheri Distt. Kamal (Haryana)-132117

426. State Bank ofPatiala, GT Road, Panipat (Haryana)-132103

427. State Bank ofPatiala, Samallakha, Distt . Panipat (Haryana)-132105 428. State Bank of Patiala, Thermal Plant, Panipat (Haryana)-132015 429. State Bank of Patiala, Fertilizer Complex, PO Khadi AshramGT Raod, Panipat (Haryana)-132104

430. State Bank of Patiala, Near Old Courts , Rohtak Road, Sonipat (Haryana)-131001

431. State Bank of Patiala, Garhwal , VPO Garhwal, Distt. Sonipat (Haryana)131030

4385

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

444. State Bank of Patiala , Auto Mobile Market, Barnala Road , Hissar (Haryana)

445. State Bank of Patiala, (Daulat Pur Chowk) Vard No. 3 , Baarwala Distt, Hissar (Haryana) -126010

446. State Bank of Patiala, Bhuna Jakhal , Bhuna Road , Distt . Fatehabad (Haryana)

447. State Bank ofPatiala, Tohan, I GGovt. College Building (Civil Court) Distt. Tohan , (Near SMO Office) (Haryana) 448. State Bank of Patiala, Narnaul (Distt. Courts) , Teh . Narnaul, Distt . Mohindergarh (Haryana) -123001

449. State Bank of Patiala, Bawana VPO Bawana, Distt, Mohindergarh (Haryana) -123029

450. StateBank ofPatiala, Ateli Mandi , Distt . Mohindergarh (Haryana) 451. State Bank of Patiala , Kanina Mandi PO Kanina, Distt . Mohindergarh , (Haryana)-1232027

452. State Bank of Patiala,

Ratia, Distt. Fatehabad (Haryana)

432. State Bank ofPatiala , 1 Mini Secretariat, Sonipat (Haryana)-131001 433. State Bank ofPatiala , Chhoti Mandi, Rly Road, Ganaur Distt. Sonipat (Haryana)-125021

434. State Bank of Patiala , Bhiwani (Rly Road) ,Ganaur Distt . Sonipat (Haryana)

435. State Bank ofPatiala, Bhiwani (New Grain Market ) , Teh . & Distt . Bhiwani , (Haryana)-125021

436. State Bank ofPatiala, Kunger, Teh . & Distt. Bhiwarți, ( Haryana ) 125041 437. State Bank ofPatiala, Teh.&Distt. Bhiwani, Vikas Nagar, (Haryana) 125021

438. State Bank of Patiala , Neki Pur-Digwa VPO Nekipur , Via DigwaTeh . Luharu, Distt, Bhiwani (Haryana)

439. State Bank of Patiala, Mini Secretariat, Bhiwani , Teh. & Distt . Bhiwani (Haryana)-125021

440. State Bank of Patiala, Adarsh College, Bhiwani , Distt . Bhiwani (Haryana) 441. StateBank ofPatiala, RlyRoad Hissar, Teh & Distt. Hissar (Haryana) 125001

442. State Bank ofPatiala, Mayar VPOMayar , Teh . Tohana Distt. Hissar, (Haryana)-125001

443. State Bank ofPatiala, Kharak Punia Teh, Hansi , Distt . Hissar, (Haryana) 126011

453. State Bank of Patiala, Kheri Sampla (Near Rly Station ), Distt. Rohtak (Haryana)-124501

454. State Bank ofPatiala, Rohtak Distt. Rohtak, (Haryana ) -124001

455. State Bank of Patiala , Circular Road DLF Colony, Rohtak Distt Rohtak, (Haryana)-124001..

456. State Bank ofPatiala, Kath Mandi , Rohtak , Distt. Rohtak ( Haryana) 124001

457. State Bank of Patiala, Sirsa Main , 203 , New Additional , Teh . & Distt. Sirsa (Haryana)-125055

458. State Bank of Patiala, Nathu Shri Chopta, Teh . & Distt . Sirsa (Haryana) 125055

459. State Bank of Patiala , Rania (Near Bus Stand) Distt. Sirsa (Haryana) 125055

460. State Bank ofPatiala, Elnabad, (Main Bazar , Mamera Chowk) Distt . Sirsa (Haryana).

461. State Bank of Patiala , Sec 15, SCO- 11 , Panchkula Distt . Panchkula , (Haryana)

462. State Bank ofPatiala , Sec-20 - SCO- 236, Panckula Distt . , Panchkula (Haryana)

463. StateBank of Patiala, Sec- 5, SCO 87-88 , ( Mansa Devi Complex) , Panchkula Distt. , Panchkula (Haryana) 4386

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

Central Bank of India

464. Central Bank of India

PMT Loni Branch , Utility Complex, Loni Budtuk, Tal: Rabata Dist.: Ahmednagar , Maharashtra .

465. Central Bank of India

Seoni Malwa Branch in front of State Bank of IndiaBanapura- Seoni Malwa Road , Hoshangabad Μ.Ρ. 461221.

466. Central Bank of India

Mohta Nagar Branch Bhagirathpura , Indore , M.P. 467. Central Bank of India

Gwalior Development Authority Branch , 1 , Ravi Nagar, Gwalior Development Authority, Gwalior , Μ.Ρ.474002.

468. Central Bank of India

Ashok Nagar Branch , Mandi Road , Ashok Nagar , Ashok Nagar , M.P.

469. Central Bank of India

Shujalper Branch 11/259 , Mahatmagandhi Marg , Shujalpur, Distt. Shajapur M.P. 456333.

470. Central Bank of India

Central Bank of India, Gopalganj Branch , Gopalganj Sagar, M.P. 470001 .

471. Central Bank of India

Hasangaj , P.O. Hasanganj , Dist .: Katihar (Bihar ) 472. Central Bank of India

Angel Public School Branch , Sehdev Street , Vishwas Nagar, Delhi - 110032

473. Central Bank of India

DDA Manglapuri Branch , DDA Project Office , Manglapuri , Delhi - 110045

474. Central Bank of India

Sector 18 , Rohini Branch, H - 3 /27 , Sector - 18 , Rohini , Delhi - 110089

475. Central Bank of India

Shalimar Bagh Branch , B.P. 56 , Shalimar Bagh , Delhi- 110088

476. Central Bank of India

Airforce Station Branch , 412 , Airforce Station , Club Road, New Delhi - 110003

477. Central Bank of India

Lady Harding Medical College and Hospital Branch, Lady Harding Medical College and Hospital , Opp . Puchkuia Road , New Delhi - 110001 478. Central Bank of India

NewGreen Feild Public School Branch , New Green Feild Public School Saket, Road No. 22 , Post Office-Saket, New Delhi- 110017

479. Central Bank of India

KherakhurdBranch, 154, Pradhan Market , Holambi Road, Kherakhurd , Khera kalan , Delhi - 110082 480. Central Bank of India

Barwala Branch, Khasra No. 87/72 , Bawana Road, Barwala-110039

481. Central Bank of India

$D School , Shahdara , Bara Bazar , Sanatan Dharam Senior Secondary School , Sahadara , Delhi - 110032

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 482. Central Bank of India

Barhmer Branch , Near kamdar Company Rai Colony Road, Barhmer- 344001 (Rajasthan) 483. Central Bank of India

Nathdwara Branch , Gokul Plaza , Bhandari ji ka Complex, Nai Sadak , Post Office- Nathdwara, Distt . Rajsamand-313301 ( Rajasthan)

484. Central Bank of India

Bundi Branch , Near Bahadur Singh Circle , Kailash Kunj Nainwa Road , Bundi - 323001 ( Rajasthan ) 485. Central Bank of India

Gangapur City Branch , Hindone Karoli Road , Udai Mod Gangapur City Sawai Madhopur , Distt . Sawai Madhopur - 322202 ( Rajasthan )

486. Central Bank of India

Dhobighat Branch , Dhobighat , Near Dainik Bhaskar Indira Gandhi Marg , Ring Road , South Civil Lines , Jabalpur

487. Central Bank of India

Rajajipuram Branch , E-2203 , First Floor , Rajaji Puram , Lucknow (UP)

488. Central Bank of India

Raghav Nagar Branch , House No. 291/10 , Mohalla- Raghav Nagar , Deoria -274001 (UP) 489. Central Bank of India

APMC Amrawati Branch , New Cotton Market , Sehkar Nagar , Amrawati -444604

490. Central Bank of India Pratap Nagar Ring Road Branch , Plot No. 23 , Near PadoleHospital , Pratap Nagar, Ring Road , Nagpur-440022

491. Central Bank of India Bandra Kurla Office , Plot No. 368 , Sai Ashish Apartment , Swami Vivekanand Road, Bandra (West) Mumbai -400050

492. Central Bank of India

Vikhroli Branch, Building C- 1 , Ferozsah Nagar, Hill Side, Lal Bahadur Shastri Marg, Vikroli (West ) Mumbai -400079

493. Central Bank of India Worli Branch , Shri Chander Baba Mandir Trust Building, Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli Naka, Mumbai -400018

494. Central Bank of India

Garaha Chowk Branch , Distt . Muzafarpur , Bihar 495. Central Bank of India

Harpur Hardas Branch , Khoksa Bujurg Desari , Distt. Vaishali , Bihar

496. Central Bank of India

Amnaur Branch , Block Garha Chowk , Bhuchoh Block, Distt . Muzaffarpur

497, Central Bank of India

Patedhi Belsar Branch , Anirudh Belsar, Distt . Vaishali , Bihar - 844111 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

4387

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9, 2008/श्रावण 18, 1930

498. Central Bank of India

Rustampur Branch, Kachhi Dargah , Patna City, Patna,Bihar

499. Central Bank of India

TersiaBranch, Hazipur, Distt . Vaishali, Bihar-844101

500. Central Bank of India

Bhagwanpur Branch, Meena Complex, Reva Road, Muzaffarpur, Distt. Muzaffarpur, Bihar

501. Central Bank of India

Rahesa Branch, Bhagwanpur, Distt. Vaishali, Bihar-844144

502, Central Bank of India

Paharpur Branch , Gajraul , Bhagwanpur, Vaishali , Bihar-844114

503: Central Bank of India

Mehsaul Branch , Runni Sedpur , Distt . Sitamarhi , Bihar-843328

504. Central Bank of India

Madhopur Chaturi Branch , Saurah , Nagpur , Distt. Sitamarhi , Bihar-843333

505. Central Bank of India

Pohyar Branch, Pohyar , Shipali Bhawan, Distt. Vaishali , Bihar- 844507

506. Central Bank of India

DDA Rohini Branch, DDA Office Complex, Deepali Chowk, Sector -3 , Rohini , Delhi - 110085 507. Central Bank of India

Dig Branch, Opp . Hindi Library , Old Anajmandi Dig., Distt. Bhartpur- 321203 (Rajasthan) 508. Central Bank of India

Dausa Branch , Bohara Motors Building, Agra Road, Dausa Post Office , Distt . Dausa- 303303 ( Rajasthan)

509. Central Bank of India

Sumerpur Branch, Near Income Tax Office , Ganesh Marg, Sumerpur , Distt. Pali - 306902 (Rajasthan)

510. Central Bank of India

JaloraBranch, Rajendera Complex, Hardev Joshi Circle, Jalora- 343001 (Rajasthan) 511. Central Bank of India

Bandra Kurla Branch , Plot No. C-6 , B Block, Bandra Kurla Complex , Bandra (East) Mumbai -400051

512. Central Bank of India

Boriwali Branch , Ganesh Bhawan , Pai Nagar, Bandra (West) , Mumbai -400092

513. Central Bank of India

Dahisar East Branch, Shivshakti Complex, SV Road, Dahisar East, Mumbai -400068

514. Central Bank of India

Kalina Branch, 168 , Diamond Estate, Near Mahaauto , CST Road, Vidya Nagari , Kalina , Mumbai-400068-

2823G1/08-6

515. Central Bank of India

Lower Parel Branch , Sri Niwas Cotton Mills Compound, Tulsi Pipe Road , Lower Parel , Mumbai-400013

SYNDICATE BANK

516. Syndicate Bank

Sojati Gatęjodhpur Branch , Hotel Gopalakrishna Building, Sojati Gate, Jodhpur-342001 ( Rajasthan) 517. Syndicate Bank

Jhalana Dhoongri Jaipur Branch, Agra By Pass , RSBCC Sethu Bhavan , Jhalana Dhoongri , Distt. Jaipur- 302004 (Rajasthan)

518. Syndicate Bank

Manesar Branch, Village & P.O. Manesar, Kasan Road, Manesar , Dist . Gurgoan- 122050 (Haryana)

519. Syndicate Bank

Gurgaon Lead District Office , 472/11 , Old Railway Road, Gurgaon, Dist . Gurgaon - 122001 Haryana 520. Syndicate Bank

Chhindwara Branch, Opposite Saint Joseph High School, Khajri Road, Chhindwara-480001 Madhyapradesh

521. Syndicate Bank

Betul Branch, Near Brahmaakumari Ashram , Sadar Itarsi Road, Betul -460001 , Madhyapradesh 522. Syndicate Bank

MandlaBranch, Plot No. 10/8 , Rani Awanti Bai Ward, Mandla Raipur Main Road , Mandla-481661 Madhyapradesh

523. Syndicate Bank

Indore Annapoorna Road Branch , No. 21 , Chanderi Kothi , Annapoorna Main Road, Sudama Nagar, P.O. Indore -452009 Madhyapradesh 524. Syndicate Bank

Shikohabad Branch , Near Bus Stand , Shikohabad, Distt. Firozabad- 205135 Uttar Pradesh

525. Syndicate Bank

Koramangala J. Block Branch No. 703 , III Block, Behind BDA Shopping Complex, Koramangala 111 Block, Distt. Bangalore Urban -560034 Karnataka 526. Syndicate Bank

Marsur Branch , Jai Jyothi Laminates Compound Chandapur, Anekal Road , Anekal Taluk, Dist. Bangalore Rural - 562106, Karnataka

527. Syndicate Bank

Shankarnagar APMC Yard Branch, 151 , Shankarnagar Main Road , Bangalore -560096 Karnataka

528. Syndicate Bank

K.H. Road , KSRTC Depot Branch , KSRTC Depot , Transport House , Kengal Hanumanthaiah Road, Bangalore Urban -560027 Karnataka

529 Syndicate Bank

Nagasandra Branch , Dist. Tumkur -572134 Karnataka 4388

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 /SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] UNITED BANKOF INDIA

548. United Bank of India

Jharkhand zone

Hazaribagh Branch , P.B. No. 17, Hazaribagh Town , Hazaribagh - 825301

530. United Bank of India

549. United Bank of India

Jamshur Branch , Sakchi , Jamshedpur - 931001 Amlabad Branch , P.O. Amlabad Colliery, Dist . Dhanbad- 828311

531. United Bank of India

550. United Bank of India Jaridih Bazar Branch , AT & PO Jaridih Bazar (Bermo) , Giridih- 825214

BankMore Branch , Post Box No. 2 , Bank More , Dhanbad -826001

551. United Bank of India

532. United Bank of India

Basia Branch , P.O. Basia, Dist . Gumla- 835229

Jhumritelaiya Branch , Jhumritelaiya, Dist. Kodarma- 815409

533. United Bank of India

552. United Bank of India

Bhowra Branch, Dhanbad- 828302

Kalubathan Branch , P.O. Nirsachati , Dist. Dhanbad , Jharkhand

534. United Bank of India

553. United Bank of India

Birni Branch , P.O. Birni, P. S. Palanji , Giridih-825318

Kamdara Branch , Kamdara , Dist . Gumla, Jharkand 535. United Bank of India

554. United Bank of India Kanke Branch , Kanke , Ranchi - 834006

Bistupur Branch, " R" Road, Bistupur, Jamshedpur, Dist. Jamshedpur - 831001

555. United Bank of India Kedla Branch , P.O. Parej , Ghatotand, Hazaribagh 536. United Bank of India

Bokaro Steel City Branch , Plot No. E6 , City Centre Bokaro Steel City - 827004 Jharkhand

556. United Bank of India Kolebira Branch, Kolebira, Dist. Simdega - 835211 537. United Bank of India

557. United Bank of India Kuru Branch, Dist. Lohardaga- 835213

Bokaro Steel City Industrial Area Branch, Bokaro Ind. Area , P.O. Balidih, Bokaro - 827010

538. United Bank of India

558. United Bank of India Larikalan Branch , P.O. Larikalan , Dist . Hazaribagh Chanho Branch , Vill & P.O. Chanho , Ranchi -835214

559. United Bank of India Lohardanga Branch , Lohardanga Main Road, Dist. Lohardanga - 835302

539. United Bank of India

560. United Bank of India

Charhi Branch , P.O. Charhi , Distt . Hazaribagh , Bihar-825336

MandarBranch . Mandar , Ranchi - 835214

540. United Bank of India

561. United Bank of India

Chas Bazar Branch , Chas , Dhanbad- 827013

Morabadi Branch , Yasada Tower , Tagore Hill Road, Morabadi , Ranchi

541. United Bank of India

562. United Bank of India Namkum Branch , Namkum , Ranchi

DaltonGanj Branch , Dharamshala Road , Daltonganj , Palamau - 822101

542. United Bank of India

563. United Bank of India Nawatoli Branch , P.O. Konbir Nawatoli Basia , Distt. Gumla- 835303

Deoghar Branch , S.B. Roy Road, Deoghar , Distt. Deoghar- 814112

564. United Bank of India

543. United Bank of India

Ojhadih Branch , P.O. Ojhadih Katania , Dist. Dhanbad , Jharkhand - 828109

Dhanbad Branch , P.B. No. 66 , Naya Bazar , Dhanbad -8260101

565. United Bank of India

544. United Bank of India

Parsabad Branch , Parsabad , Dist . Kodarma- 925320 Dhumri Branch , Vill . Dhumri , P.O. Hirang, Via Chatra, Dist . Hazaribagh - 825403

566. United Bank of India Ramgarh Branch , P.O. Ramgarh , Dist . Hazaribagh 545. United Bank of India

Ghatshila Branch , Main Road, Ghat Shila, Singbhumi -832303

567. United Bank of India Ranchi Branch , P.B. No. 94 , Main Road, Dist. Ranchi

546. United Bank of India

Giridih Branch , B.P. No. 08 , Giridih - 815301

568. United Bank of India Rania Branch, P.O. Rania , Via Torpa , Dist . Ranchi 547. United Bank of India.

569. United Bank of India

Hatia Branch , E - 115 , H.E.C. Township , Jagannathnagar , Dhurwa , Ranchi - 834004

Soso Branch , Block Ramgarh , P.O. Soso , Dist .Hazaribagh [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

570. United Bank of India

St. Columbas College Branch , P.O. College More , Hazaribagh

571. United Bank of India

Tapkara Branch, Tapakara, Ranchi - 835227 572. United Bank of India

Torpa Branch, Torpa, Ranchi - 835227

573. United Bank of India

Tundi Branch , Vill . & P.O. Tundi, Dhanbad- 828142 574. United Bank of India

R. K: Mission Vidyapith ( Deoghar) Branch , William Town, Deoghar

575. United Bank of India

Jarkhand Regional Office , Pee Pee Compound, MainRoad, Ranchi- 834001

UNION BANK OF INDIA

Regional Office, Jaipur

576. Union Bank of India

Jagatpura , Jaipur Branch , E- 8 , Anand Vihar , Railway Colony, Jaipur-302075

Regional Office, Raipur

577. Union Bank of India

Kanker Branch , janakpur Ward , Near Bus Stand, MainRoad, Kanker, Distt . Kanker

578. Union Bank of India

Pandri Raipur Branch , Bhatia Bhavan, Main Road, Pandri , Paipur, Distt . Raipur

579. Union Bank of India

Mahasamund Branch , Near LIC Office , Main Road , Mahasamund , Distt . Mahasamund 580. Union Bank of India

Gevra Branch, Pragati Nagar, C Type Complex , Dipka Gevra, Distt . Korba (Chhattisgarh)-495452 581. Union Bank of India

Retail Asset Branch, Ajit Tower, Ramsagarpara , Raipur , Distt . Raipur (C.G . )-492001

Regional Office, Indore

582. Union Bank of India

Khajarana Branch , 12/ 12 -A, Jeevan Pradeep Bldg, LIC Bldg. , Anoop Nagar , A. B. Road, Indore , (Μ.Ρ.)-452011

583. Union Bank of India

RetailAsset Branch , IKDC Campur, 2/2, Old Palasia, Indore , M.P.-452001

Regional Office, Meerut

584. Union Bank of India

Indirapuram Branch , Plot No. 6, Express Market, Vikas Khand, Indirapuram , Ghaziabad , Distt . Ghaziabad, U.P.

4389

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

585. Union Bank of India

Retail Asset Branch , Ghaziabad , 54, Model Town , G.T. Road, Ghaziabad -201001 , Distt . Ghaziabad, U.P.

586. Union Bank of India

Retail Asset Branch , Meerut, First Floor, Opp. Govt. Inter College, Belgum Bridge Road, Meerut-251001 , Distt. Meerut , U.P.

Regional Office, Dehradun

587. Union Bank of India

PatelNagar Branch, Patel Nagar Industrial Area Road, Patel Nagar, Dehradun , Uttarakhand-248001 Regional Office, Chandigarh

588. Union Bank of India

Ratia Branch , Main Tohana Road, Ratia, Haryana 589. Union Bank of India

Umri Branch,Village & Post Umri , Distt . Kurushetra, Haryana

590. Union Bank of India

Bhuntar Branch, National High Way, 21 , Near Sun Beem Hotel , Main Bazar, Bhuntar, Distt . Kullu 591. Union Bank of India .

Sector-7, Branch Chandigarh, S.C.O, 33 , Sector - 7, Chandigarh

Regional Office, Lucknow

592. Union Bank of India

Asset Reconstruction Branch, 29, M.G. Road , Hazartganj , P.B. No, 101 , Lucknow, 226001 Uttar Pradesh

593. Union Bank of India

Unity College Branch , Moulana Kulbey Abid Road,Husainabad Chowk, Lucknow-226003 594. Union Bank of India

Retail Asset Branch , 2/9 A, Vinay Khand, Gomti Nagar , Lucknow-226010

Regional Office, Patna

595. Union Bank of India

Gopalganj Branch, Janta Cinema Campus , Late Phooldeo Babu Marg , Gopalganj , Distt. Gopalganj , Bihar, Pin-841428

Nodal Regional Office , Mumbai (South)

596. Union Bank of India

LowerParel Branch , Yashwant Bhavan , Ground Floor, Pandurang Bhudhakar Marg, Lower parel, Mumbai-400013

597. Union Bank of India

Lalbaug Branch , Shop No. 1 , 2 and 3 , Anant Apartment, Meghwadi , Dr. S.S. Rao , Lalbaug , Mumbai-400012

Regional Office, Ahmedabad

598. Union Bank of India

Zundal Branch, A-9 , Kalptaru Park Society, Village Zundal , Taluka- Distt . Gandhinagar- 382 412 4390

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

Regional Office , Nasik

599. Union Bank of India

Collector Office , Nandurbar Branch ,

Nadurbar-425 412

600. Union Bank of India

Garkheda Road, Aurangabad Branch , Plot No. 67, Sector A, Garkheda Road , Aurangabad - 431005 Regional Office (N) Thane

601. Union Bank of India

Koparkhairne Branch, Cassabela, Ground Floor , B Wing, Plot No. B -219 , Sector - 19 , Koparkhairne , Navi Mumbai -410 709

602. Union Bank of India

Kamote Branch, Sahyadri , C-011 , Plot No. 13 , Sector- 10 , Kamote, Navi Mumbai -410 209 603. Union Bank of India

Dharavi Branch , 82 /H , Goldfield Enclave , Sion Bandra Link Road, Mumbai - 400017

604. Union Bank of India

Mhape Branch, Puneet Bldg. , Unit No. 37 and 38, Hasti Industrial Premises , CHSL , Opp . Millenium Business Park, Mhape , Navi Mumbai -400 710 NodalRegionalOffice, Hyderabad

605, Union Bank of India

Himayat Nagar Branch, Door No. 3-5-919 to 925 , Balaji Arcade , Main Road , Himayat Nagar , Hyderabad-500029

1

Regional Office, Vijaywada

606. Union Bank of India

RetailAsset Branch , Ground Floor, 39-9 2/2 , Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple Street Labbipet , VijayWada-520 010

Dist. Krishna (Andhra Pradesh)

Regional Office, Ernakulam

607. Union Bank of India

Malappuram Brarnich, K.P.M. Building, Middle Hill , NH -23, Malappuram -676505 Distt .Malappuram (Kerala)

608. Union Bank of India

Pavaratti Branch , Fatima Building, Opp . Bus Stand, Pavaratti - 680507

Dist . Thrissur (Kerala)

Regional Office , Siligudi

609. Union Bank of India

Baharampur Branch , 24 , Radhika Mohan Sen Road, P.O. Baharampur , Dist. Murshidabad , Pin-742101

610. Union Bank of India

Cooch Behar , Nirupama Bhawan , Suniti Road , Harish Pal Chowpathy, Cooch Behar - 736101 611. Union Bank of India

!

MaldaBranch , 69/2 , B.G. Road , P.S. English Bazar , PostMokdumpur , Distt. Malda (W. Bengal ) 732103

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 612. Union Bank of India

Raiganj Branch , Cooli Towers, Parbati School Road, Rai Ganj , West Dinajpur, Pin Code - 733134 613. Union Bank of India

Salu Gara Military Station Branch , Military Station , Shopping Complex , Salugaraha , Distt . Jalpaiguri , Pin Code- 734008

614. Union Bank of India

Sevoke Road Branch , Rainbow House , Sevoke Road, Siliguri , Distt . Darjeeling , Pin Code - 734001 Regional Office , Kolkata

615. Union Bank of India

Tollygangue Branch , 1st Floor , Merlin Grove , Raja Ram Mohan Roy Road , Kolkata , Pin Code - 700008 616. Union Bank of India

Santoshpur Survey Park Branch , B - 178 , Survey Park, Santoshpur , Kolkata , Pin Code- 700075 617. Union Bank of India

Sonarpur Branch , Sonar Kela, 1st Floor , Sonapur Station Road, Dist. 24 , Parganas (South ) , Kolkata , Pin Code-700.150

618. Union Bank of India

Ranihati Branch , At & Post Navghar , Dist. Howrah West Bengal , Pin Code- 711322 Regional Office Delhi (North)

619. Union Bank of India

Regional Office, Delhi ( North ) , 14-17, First Floor, local Shopping Complex , BQ - Block , Shalimar Bagh , Delhi - 110088

Regional Office , Agra

620. Union Bank of India

Regional Office , Agra , Friends Wasan Plaza , Sanjay Place, Agra, Distt . Agra - 282003 ( U.P. ) Regional Office , Karnal

621. Union Bank of India

Regional Office , Karnal Model Town , Karnal Kunjupura Chowk , Karnal ( Haryana )

Regional Office , Goa

622. Union Bank of India

Regional Office, Goa , Nizmar Center , Ist Floor, Aatamaram Borkar Marg , Panji , Goa-403001 ORIENTALBANK OF COMMERCE

623. Oriental Bank of Commerce

Regional Office, The Landmark, First Floor , No. 21/15 , Mahatma Gandhi Road , Bangalore - 560001 624. Oriental Bank of Commerce

Regional Office, Alok Bharti Tower , Shahid Nagar , Bhubneshwar - 751007

625. Oriental Bank of Commerce

Regional Office, Galeria Market, lInd Floor , Nachan Road , Benachity , Durgapur - 713213 626. Oriental Bank of Commerce

Regional Office , OBC Tower , 3rd Floor , 917-20- 20A, Fargusson College Road, Pune - 411004 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

627. Oriental Bank of Commerce

Regional Office , Aman Chambers , 1st Floor, Veer Savarkar Marg, Opp. New Passport Office , Prabha Devi, Mumbai-400025

628. Oriental Bank of Commerce

Branch Office, Paljor Stadium, Gangtok. (Sikkim)- 737101

Reserve Bank of India

629. Reserve Bank of India

Bakery Junction, P.B. No. 6507

630. Reserve Bank of India

RailHead Complex, P.B. No. 01 , Jammu - 180012

INDIAN BANK

State/Union Territory-Tamil Nadu 631. Indian Bank

Head Office , 66 , Rajaji Salai , Chennai -600001 State/Union Territory-New Delhi

632. Indian Bank

Jasola Branch , Asia Pesific Institute of Management, 3 & 4, Institutional Area, Jasola (Opposite to Saritha Vihar) , New Delhi - 110025 633. Indian Bank

Punjabi Bagh Branch, 53 , West Avenue Road, Punjabi Bagh (East ), New Delhi- 110026 634. Indian Bank

Microset Branch, 2/7 , First Floor , Desh Bandu GuptaRoad, Pahad Ganj , New Delhi - 110055 635. Indian Bank

ShalimarBaghBranch, 103-104, U and V Market, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi - 110088

636. Indian Bank

Rajmohalla Branch , 177 , Dakshin Rajmohalla, VaishnavBal Mandir Prangan , Indore -452009 (Μ.Ρ.)

637. IndianBank

Sector 17, Gurgaon Branch , 621 , Sector - 17 , Housing Board Colony, Gurgaon - 122001 (Haryana)

Central Bank of India

638. Central Bank of India

Bhayander Branch, 1st Floor, Oswal Ornate , Opp . jainMandir , Jeswal Park Road, Bhayander (East) Dist. Thane

639. Central Bank of India

New Panvel Branch, Indra Aangan CHS, 1st Floor , Plot No. 2, Sector 2 , Khanda Colony Chowk, New Panvel-410206, Dist . -Raigad

4391

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/श्रावण 18 , 1930

640. Central Bank of India

Vasant Vihar Branch, Agrawal Arcade , Opp . Edeenwood Complex , Chitalsar Manpada , Thane (West)-400610

641. Central Bank of India SawardeBranch , Post Sawarde , Taluka Chiplun , Dist. Ratnagiri -415606

642. Central Bank of India

Khed Branch , Aniket Shopping Plaza, Near S.T. Stand, Dist. Ratnagiri -415709

643. Central Bank of India

Cash Management Services Branch , 2nd Floor , Mumbai Main Office , M.G. Road, Fort , Mumbai- 400023

Punjab National Bank

Branches under Kozhikode Region :

644. Punjab National Bank

BranchOffice: Chelari , PV Building, Chelari , P.O. Velimukku , Distt . Malappuram , Kerala-676317 645. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office : Parappanangadi , 11/1178 , Ist Floor, AC Commercial Complex, Parappanangadi , Distt. Malapuram , Kerala- 676303

646. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office : Ponnani 30/86 D, P.B. No. 17 , City Centre Chanthappadi , Ponnani , Distt . Malappuram , Kerala -679577-

647. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office: Bank Road , Kannur Ist Floor , Sushil Tower Bank Road, Kannur , Distt . Kannur , Kerala-670001

648. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office: Kuttiadi Karapara Building,Near Govt. Hospital , Kuttiadi , Distt . Kozhikode , Kerala- 673508.

649. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office: Kalikavu Wandoor Road , Kalikavu , Distt . Malappuram , Kerala - 676525

650. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office: Vengara , Maliyakkal Building, Ist Floor, Vengara, Distt. Malappuram , Kerala- 676304 651. Punjab National Bank Branch Office : Meladi Main Road Meladi , Distt . Kozhikode , Kerala -673522

652. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office: Nadapuram , N.K. Complex Opp . Bus Stand , Nadapuram , Distt. Kozhikode , Kerala- 673504

653. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office : Tellichery TMC 44/4416, Parris Building Logans Road , Tellicherry , Distt . Kannur , Kerala-670101 4392

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

654. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office : Badgara , P.B. No. 5 , Main Road , Badgara , Distt . Kozhikode , Kerala - 673101 655. Punjab National Bank

Regional Collection Centre (R.C.C. ) P.B. No. 11 , K.P. Kesava Menon Road , Kozhikode , Distt . Kozhikode, Kerala- 673001

656. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office : Eramangalam , P.O. Eramangalam, Dist . Malappuram , Kerala - 679587

657. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office : Kunnamangalam , Main Road , Kunnamangalam . Dist . Kozhikode , Kerala - 673571 658. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office : Malappuram, P.B. No. 203 , 17/485/ J, Bus Stand Road, P.M. Arcade , Malappuram , Dist. Malappuram, Kerala- 676519

659. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office : Nanminda , Dist. Kozhikode , Kerala-676613

660. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office : Payyannur P.B. No. 22, Central Bazar, Payyannur , Dist . Kannur , Kerala -670307 661. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office : Perinthalmanna , 18/ 1129-21 & 30 , C.J. Towers Ooty Road, Perinthalmanna, Dist. Malappuram , Kerala- 679322

662. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office: Tirur , P.B. No. 13 , Central Junction, Tirur , Dist. Malappuram , Kerala-676101

663. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office : Quilandy Pisharikavu Temple Premises Kollam , Quilandy, Dist . Kozhikode, Kerala-673035

664. Punjab National Bank

P.O. Ambalapara, Palakkad -679512 Kerala 665. Punjab National Bank

28/29 , Mukkath Towers Bypass Jn . , Aluva - 683101 Kerala

666. Punjab National Bank

Door No. 9/378 , C. Bazar , Chittur , Palakkad - 678101 Kerala

667. Punjab National Bank

Panchavadi Complex P.O. Parali , Edathara , Palakkad - 678612 Kerala

668. Punjab National Bank

Ras Complex , P.O. Kakkayur , Koduvayoor (Via) Palakkad - 678512 Kerala

669. Punjab National Bank

Door No. 1/706 , Dwaraka , 12th Street , Kalpathy, Palakkad-678003 Kerala

670. Punjab National Bank

$S1 Branch , Opp . Tata Keltron Ltd. NH Road, Kanjikode- 678623 , Kerala

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 671. Punjab National Bank

8/702, Biju Building , Kazhani Chungam , Kavassery - 678543 Kerala

672. Punjab National Bank

P.O. Kinassery , Palakkad- 679707 Kerala

673. Punjab National Bank

"Roshni" Kottekad P.O. Palakkad- 678732 Kerala 674. Punjab National Bank

PB No. II , Palakkad Road , Kulappully, Shoranur- 679122 Kerala

675. Punjab National Bank

3/605, Venkatesa Nivas , Kuthnur- 678721 Palghat Kerala

676. Punjab National Bank

PB No. 4, S.R.T. Complex, Pollachi Road, Kollengode-678506 Kerala

677. Punjab National Bank

Padoor Road, Mannapra , Palakkad - 678685 Kerala 678. Punjab National Bank

6/133 -B, Silver Plaza , Keecheripadi , Muvattupuzha -686673

679. Punjab National Bank

4/33, Main Road, Nemmara , Palakkad -- 678508 Kerala

680. Punjab National Bank

V/488, Puliyappatta Bldgs . Pallipuram , Palakkad- 679305

681. Punjab National Bank

Balamandiram , Panangattiri , Palakkad - 678506 Kerala

682. Punjab National Bank

PB No. 9 , Palakkad Road , Ottapalam- 679101 , Kerala

683. Punjab National Bank

PB No. 4 , Hyatt Complex , Pattambi - 679303 , Kerala 684. Punjab National Bank

IV/605 , "Meera " Peringottukurissi , Palakkad- 678574, Kerala

685. Punjab National Bank

8/497, Kailas , Puthiyankam, Palakkad- 678545 , Kerala

686. Punjab National Bank

Karukaputhur Chazhiyattiri P.O. Thirumittacode , Palakkad-679535 , Kerala

687. Punjab National Bank

P.O. Thiruvegappura , Palakkad - 679304 , Kerala 688. Punjab National Bank

Menaka Arcade , S.A. Road, Vyttila P.O. , Kochi- 682019, Kerala [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Regional Office , Alwar

690. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office Sidhpur , District: Kangra (Himachal Pradesh) Pin . 176057 691. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office Maranda, District : Kangra (Himachal Pradesh) Pin . 176102 692. Punjab National Bank

BO Angul , Amalapada, 1st line , Kanchan Talkies Road, Orissa-759122

693. Punjab National Bank

Barbil , Station Road , Matkambeda. Keonjhar , Orissa-758035

694. Punjab National Bank

Baripada, At - K.M.B.M . Sahi , Word No. 5, P.O. Baripada ,Distt .: Mayurbhanj , Orissa - 757001 695. Punjab National Bank

Duburi , At + P.O. Baragodia , Distt .: Jajpur ,. Orissa-755026

696. Punjab National Bank

Branch Office, S. D. Public School , Jagadhari , Distt. Yamunanagar (Haryana)

United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

697. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Branch Office- III , Ambawadi , Jaipur

698. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

DivisionOffice, In front of SBBJ , Lohagad Road , Ajmer

699. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Branch Office,Gauri Kunj , Raj Nagar Road, Kankroli

700. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Branch Office , Badveli Haveli , Subhash Bazar, Tonk(Rajasthan)

701. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Divisional Office , II , 24 DEF , Ashwini Bazar, Udaipur

702. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Branch Office , MK Mumhare Gate , I , Numaish Road,Bharatpur

703. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Branch Office , Yalecha Mansion, In front of Stadium, Sangner (Jaipur)

704. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Branch Office , B- 104A , Ganpati Plaza, Phoolbağ, Bhiwadi , Alwar

705. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Branch Office, Dhoolkot , Dhaulpur ( Rajasthan) 706. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Branch Fifth, Branch Office -5, Jodhpur

4393

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

707. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Division Office, Panchshati Circle , Shardulganj , Bikaner-334003

708. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. C-97, Kalyan Villa, Subhash Marg , C Scheme , Jaipur

709. United India Insurarice Co. Ltd. Branch Office-I , Near Shastri Circle , Udaipur (Rajasthan)

710. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Branch Office, Near Alok Cinema, Churu 711. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Branch Office, Kushal Bagh , Banswada- 327001 712. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Branch Office, Fort Road, Nagaur

713. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Branch Office, Shastri Marg , Dungarpur (Rajasthan)

714. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Branch Office, Jai Shiv Chowk , Station Road , Makrana-341505

715. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. DirectAgent Branch , In front of Coffee House, Upside Khadighar , MI Road , Jaipur

716. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Branch Office-First, Jangid Bhawan , MI Road, Jaipur

National Insurance Co. Ltd.

717. National Insurance Co. Ltd. Branch Office , Gajraula, Alipur Chaupla, Gajraula 718. National Insurance Co. Ltd; Regional Office, Deharadun, 56 , Rajpur Road, Deharadun

नई दिल्ली, 2 अंगस्त, 2008

का.आ. 2145.-राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खंड 3 के उप- खंड ( 1 ) और खंड 8 के उप-खंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम, 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उप- धारा (3 ) के खंड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केंद्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक के परामर्श से, श्री अलबर्ट टोरो ( जन्म तिथि - 11-3-1951 ) , वर्तमान में कार्यकारी निदेशक, सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया को पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से और 31-3-2011 तक, अर्थात् उनकी अधिवर्षिता की तारीख तक अथवा अगला आदेश होने तक , जो भी पहले हो , विजया बैंक के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. 9/1/2008 - बी ओ -1 ]

जी. बी. सिंह , उप सचिव.

4394

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 /SRAVANA 18, 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] New Delhi , the 2nd August, 2008

नई दिल्ली, 2 अगस्त , 2008

का.आ. 2147. राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खंड 3 के उप-खंड ( 1 ) और खंड 8 के उप-खंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केंद्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक के परामर्श से , श्री के. आर. कामत (जन्मतिथि - 19-11-1955 ) , वर्तमान में कार्यकारी निदेशक , बैंक ऑफ इंडिया को पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से पांच वर्षों के लिए अथवा अगला आदेश होने तक , जो भी पहले हो , इलाहाबाद बैंक के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

S.O. 2145. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub- section (3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Aqquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act, 1970/1980, read with sub - clause ( 1 ) of Clause 3 and sub-clause ( 1 ) of Clause 8 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme , 1970/1980, the Central Government , after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India , hereby appoints Shri Albert Tauro , ( DoB : 11-3-1951 ) presently Executive Director , Central Bank of India as Chairman and Managing Director, Vijaya Bank for a period from the date of his taking charge ofthe post and up to 31-3-2011 i.e. date of his superan- nuation or until further orders , whichever is earlier .

[फा. सं. 9/ 1/2008- बी ओ- [ ] जी. बी. सिंह , उप सचिव

New Delhi , the 2nd August , 2008

[F. No. 9 / 1 /2008 -BO - I ] G. B. SINGH, Dy . Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 2 अगस्त, 2008

S.O. 2147. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section ( 3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 , read with sub - clause ( 1 ) of Clause 3 and sub- clause ( 1 ) of Clause 8 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme, 1970/1980 , the Central Government , after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, hereby appoints Shri K. R. Kamath (DoB : 19-11-1955 ) presently Executive Director, Bank of India as Chairman and Managing Director , Allahabad Bank for a period of five years from the date of his taking charge of the post or until further orders, whichever is earlier .

[F. No. 9/ 1/2008 - BO- 1 ] G. B. SINGH , Dy. Secy.

का.आ. 2146.-राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खंड 3 के उप - खंड ( 1 ) और खंड 8 के उप-खंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी (. उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केंद्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक के परामर्श से , श्री आर. एस. रेड्डी (जन्म तिथि 15-8-1950 ) , वर्तमान में कार्यकारी निदेशक, यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया को पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से और 31-8-2010 तक, अर्थात् उनकी अधिवर्षिता की तारीख तक अथवा अगला आदेश होने तक , जो भी पहले हो , आंध्रा बैंक के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक को रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

नई दिल्ली , 2 अगस्त, 2008

[फा. सं. 9/1/2008- बी ओ -1 ] जी. बी. सिंह , उप सचिव

New Delhi , the 2nd August , 2008

का.आ. 2148. राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम , 1970/1980 के खंड 3 के उप- खंड ( 1 ) और खंड 8 के उप- खंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केंद्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक के परामर्श से, श्री जॉर्ज जोसफ ( जन्म तिथि 26-4-1949 ) , वर्तमान में कार्यकारी निदेशक , सिंडीकेट बैंक को पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से 30-4-2009 तक , अर्थात् उनकी अधिवर्षिता की तारीख तक अथवा अगला आदेश होने तक, जो भी पहले हो , सिंडीकेट बैंक के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. 9/1/2008- बी ओ -1 ] जी. बी. सिंह, उप सचिव

NewDelhi , the 2nd August , 2008

S.O. 2146.- In exercise ofthe powers conferred by clause (a ) of sub- section ( 3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act, 1970/1980, read with sub- clause ( 1 ) of Clause 3 and sub - clause ( 1 ) of Clause 8 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme, 1970/1980, the Central Government, after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India , hereby appoints Shri R. S. Reddy (DoB: 15-8-1950 ) presently Executive Director , Union Bank of India as Chairman and Managing Director , Andhra Bank for a period from the date of his taking charge of the post and up to 31-8-2010 i.e. date of his superannuation or until further orders, whichever is earlier .

[F. No. 9/1 / 2008 - BO - 1 ] G. B. SINGH, Dy . Secy.

S.O. 2148. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub- section ( 3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) 4395 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18, 1930

"Body Meetings of the Council held on 18-2-2006, 10-3-2007 and 16-11-2007 without any verbal /written. communication regarding his absence . Therefore , Dr. Prasanta Kumar Mukherjee has ceased to be a member of Medical Council of India representing B. N. Mandal University.

Act, 1970/1980 , read with sub -clause ( 1 ) of Clause and sub - clause ( 1 ) of Clause 8 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980 , the Centrai Government , after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, hereby appoints Shri George Joseph (DoB: 26-4-1949 ) presently Executive Director, Syndicate Bank as Chairman and.. Managing Director, Syndicate Bank for a period from the date of his taking charge of the post and up to 30-4-2009 i.e. date of his superannuation or until further erders, whichever is earlier.

Now, therefore, in pursuance ofthe provision of sub- section (3) ofSection 7 ofthe said Act, Dr. Prasanta Kumar Mukherjee shall be deemed to have ceased to be a member oftheMedical Council of India representing B. N.Mandal University with effect from the date of issue of this notification.

[F. No. 9/1 /2008-BO-I] G. B. SINGH, Dy. Secy.

[No. V. 11013/1 /2007-ME( Policy-1 ) ] S.K. GUPTA, Under Secy.

विदेश मंत्रालय

स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय (स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण विभाग )

(सी. पी. बी. प्रभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 28 जुलाई , 2008

नई दिल्ली , 22 जुलाई, 2008

का.आ. 2150.--राजनयिक कौंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ एवं शुल्क ) अधिनियम, 1948% ( 1948 का 41 वां) की धारा 2 के अंक (क) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एत‌द्वारा भारत का राजदूतावास , ब्रस्सल्स में श्री बी. के. श्रीवास्तव , सहायक को 22-7-2008 से सहायक कौसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है । का.आ. 2149. भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) (ख) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में डा. प्रशांत कुमार मुखर्जी को दिनांक 12-10-2001 से भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् के एक सदस्य के रूप में निर्वाचित किया गया है जी बी. एन. मंडल विश्वविद्यालय का प्रतिनिधित्व करते हैं ।

[सं. टी -4330/01 /2006 ]

प्रीतम लाल , अवर सचिव ( कौंसुलर )

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(C, P.V. Division)

New Delhi , the 22nd July, 2008 भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् ने सूचित किया है कि डा. प्रशांत कुमार मुखर्जी जो भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 की धारा 3 ( 1 ) (ख ) के अधीन बी. एन. मंडल विश्वविद्यालय का प्रतिनिधित्व कर रहे हैं, ने अपनी अनुपस्थिति के बारे में कोई मौखिक लिखित सूचना दिये बगैर दिनांक 18-2-2006, 10-3-2007 और 16-11-2007 को आयोजित परिषद् की लगातार 3 सामान्य निकाय बैठकों में भाग नहीं लिया था। अतः बी. एन. मंडल विश्वविद्यालय का प्रतिनिधित्व करने वाले डा. प्रशांत कुमार मुखर्जी की भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् की सदस्यता समाप्त हो गई है ।

8:0. 2150 - Гарursuance of the clause (ii ) of the Section2 ofthe Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948, the Central Government hereby authorize Shri B. K. Srivastava, Assistant to perform the duties ofAssistant Consular Officer in the Embassy of India, Brusselswith effect from 22nd July, 2008 .

[No. Τ-4330/1 /2006]

PRITAM LAL, Under Secy. ( Consular )

नई दिल्ली, 29 जुलाई , 2008

इसलिए, अब , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उप- धारा ( 3 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में बी. एन. मंडल विश्वविद्यालय का प्रतिनिधित्व करने वाले का. प्रशांत कुमार मुखर्जी की भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् की सदस्यता को इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तम्मीख से समाप्त हुआ समझा जाएगा ।

[सं. वी. 11013/ 1 /2007- एम ई ( नीति+1 ) ]

एस. के. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव

का.आ. 2191 रांजनयिक कौंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ एवं सुल्फ) अधिनिषम, 1948 1948 का 41 वां ) की धारा 2 के. अंक (क) के अनुसरण में बोलदीव सरकार एतद्द्वारा भारत का राजदूतावास , बगदाद में श्री शेर सिंह , निम्न श्रेणी लिपिक को 29-7-2008 से सहायक कौसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[सं. टी-4330/01/2006 ] MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (Department ofHealth and Family Welfare) New Delhi , the 28th July, 2008

प्रीतम लाल, अवर सचिव ( कौसुलर )

New Delhi , the 29th July, 2008 S.O. 2149. Whereas in pursuance ofthe provision ofsub-section. ( 1)(b) of Section 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 , ( 102 of 1956) Dr. Prasanta Kumar Mukherjee was elected as a member ofthe Medical Council ofIndiarepresenting B. N. Mandal University with effect from 12-10-2001 .

S.O. 2151. In pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 ofthe Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees ) Act, 1948 , the Central Government hereby authorize Shri Sher Singh, LDC to perform the duties of Assistant Consular Officer in the Embassy of India , Baghdad with effect from 29th July, 2008

[No.T-4330/1 /2006] Whereas the Medical Council of India has informed that Dr. Prasanta Kumar Mukherjee who is representing B.N. Mandal University under Section 3 ( 1 )(b) ofIMC Act, 1956 had not participated in three consecutive General

PRITAM LAL, Under Secy. (Corisular) 2823G1/08-7 4396

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART 11-SEC. 3( ii) ]

परमाणु ऊर्जा विभाग

आदेश

मुम्बई , 24 जुलाई , 2008

: का.आ. 2152.-केन्द्रीय सिविल सेवा ( वर्गीकरण , नियंत्रण औरअपील ) नियमावली , 1965 के नियम 9 के उप- नियम ( 2 ) , नियम 12 के उप-नियम ( 2 ) के खंड ( ख ) तथा नियम 24 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में राष्ट्रपति एतद्वारा निदेश देते हैं कि भारत के राजपत्र के भाग II , खण्ड 3 , उप- खण्ड ( ii ) में दिनांक 13 अक्तूबर , 2005 के सं. सा.आ. 4017 द्वारा प्रकाशित भारत सरकार, परमाणु ऊर्जा विभाग के आदेश में निम्नलिखित संशोधन किये जाएंगे :

(क) भाग II में क्र. सं. 6 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियां हेतु निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या और प्रविष्टियाँ प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी :-

(क ) भारी पानी बोर्ड ( केन्द्रीय कार्यालय ) में पदों के संबंध में मुख्य प्रशासनिक अधिकारी

" 6. भारी पानी बोर्ड ( केन्द्रीय कार्यालय) एवं उसके अधीन परियोजनाओं अथवा संयंत्रों के पद

(ख) भारी पानी परियोजनाओं अथवा संयंत्रों ( कोटा, बडौदा , तलचर और मणुगुरु ) के क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों में उनके अपने नियंत्रणाधीन पदों के संबंध में मुख्य महाप्रबंधक/ महाप्रबंधक)

(ग) भारी पानी संयंत्र ( तूतीकोरिन ) के पदों के संबंध में भारी पानी बोर्ड (केन्द्रीय कार्यालय ) के सहनिदेशक( ओं )

सभी मुख्य कार्यकारी , भारी पानी बोर्ड भारी पानी बोर्ड के केन्द्रीय कार्यालय में पदों के संबंध में मुख्य प्रशासनिक अधिकारी.

भारी पानी बोर्ड सभी मुख्य कार्यकारी ,

सभी मुख्य कार्यकारी , भारी पानी बोर्ड" भारी पानी परियोजनाओं अथवा संयंत्रों ( कोटा , बडौदा, तलचर और मणुगुरू ) के क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों में उनके अपने नियंत्रणाधीन पदों के संबंध में मुख्य महाप्रबंधक/महाप्रबंधक) भारी पानी संयंत्र ( तूतीकोरिन ) के पदों के संबंध में भारी पानी बोर्ड ( केन्द्रीय कार्यालय ) के सहनिदेशक(ओं )

(ख ) भाग III में क्र. सं. 4 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों हेतु निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या और प्रविष्टियां प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी :-

( क ) भारी पानी बोर्ड ( केन्द्रीय कार्यालय ) के पदों के संबंध में प्रशासनिक अधिकारी- III

"4. भारी पानी बोर्ड (केन्द्रीय कार्यालय) एवं उसके अधीन परियोजनाओं अथवा संयंत्रों के पद

(ख) भारी पानी परियोजनाओं अथवा संयंत्रों ( कोटा , बडौदा , तलचर और मणुगुरू ) के कार्यालयों में उनके अपने नियंत्रणाधीन पदों के संबंध में उनके अपने प्रशासनिक अधिकारी- III

(ग) भारी पानी संयंत्र ( तूतीकोरिन ) के पदों के संबंध में प्रशासनिक अधिकारी- III

सभी मुख्य प्रशासनिक अधिकारी भारी पानी बोर्ड

भारी पानी बोर्ड के (केन्द्रीय कार्यालय ) के पदों के संबंध में प्रशासनिक अधिकारी- III

सभी भारी पानी परियोजनाओं

भारी पानी परियोजनाओं अथवा संयत्रों ( कोटा , बडौदा , तलचर और मणुमुरू ) के कार्यालयों में उनके अपने नियंत्रणाधीन पदों के संबंध में उनके अपने प्रशासनिक अधिकारी- III

अथवा संयंत्रों ( कोटा , बडौदा , तलचर और मणुगुरू) के कार्यालयों में उनके अपने नियंत्रणाधीन पदों के संबंध में उनके अपने मुख्य महाप्रबंधक/ महाप्रबंधक

के पदों के संबंध में प्रशासनिक अधिकारी- III भारी पानी संयंत्र ( तूतीकोरिन ) सभी भारी पानी संयंत्र ( तूतीकोरिन ) के पदों के संबंध में भारी पानी बोर्ड ( केन्द्रीय कार्यालय ) सहनिदेशक( ओ ) " के

[सं. 1/6 ( 1 )/2002- सतर्कता/136]

राधिका रस्तोगी , उप सचिव टिप्पणी:- मूल आदेश दिनांक 13 अक्तूबर , 2005 के सं. का.आ. 4017 द्वारा भारत के राजपत्र के भाग II , खण्ड 3 , उप - खण्ड ( ii ) में प्रकाशित किया गया था । 4397

भारत का राजपत्र : अमस्त 9, 2008/ श्रवण 18, 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

DEPARTMENT OF ATOMIC ENERGY

ORDER

Mumbai, the 24th July, 2008

S.O. 2152. In pursuance ofsub-rule (2) ofrule 9 and clause (b) ofsub-rufe (2)ofmile 12 and sub-rule (1)of rule 24 ofthe Ceritral Civil Services ( Classification, Control and Appeal ) Rules , 1965, the President hereby directs thin the following amendments shall be made in the Order of the Geverament of India, Department ofAtomic Energy, published in the Gazette ofindia, Part II, Section 3, Sub- section (ii ) vide number S.O. 4017 dated the 13th October , 2005, namely :

Inthe saidOrder, In the Schedule-

(a) in Part II , for serial No. 6 and the entries relating thereto, the following serial number and entries shall be substituted , namely:-

"6. Posts in Heavy WaterBoard (CentralOffice) andProjects or Plants thereunder

(a) Chief Administrative Officer in respect ofposts in the Central Office, Heavy Water Board

Chief General Managers/ General Managers in respect of posts under their respective control infield offices ofHeavy Water Projects or Plants (Kota,Baroda, Talcher andMantugturu).

(b) ChiefGeneral Managers/ General Managers in respect of posts unden their respective control in field offices ofHeavy Water Projects or Plants (Kota,Baroda, Talcher andManuguru).

(c) Associate Director (Q), HeavyWater Board (CO) in respect of posts: under HeavyWater Plant (Tuticorin)

Associate Director (0) ; Heavy Water Board (00) inrespect ofposts under HeavyWaterPlant (Tuticorin) Al Chief Executive , Heavy WaterBoard

Chief Administrative Officer in respect ofposts in the Centralor Office, Heavy Water a Board.

All Chief Executive , Heavy WaterBoard

All Chief Executive, Heavy Water Board"

(b) in Part III, for serial No. 4 and the entries relating thereto, the following serial number and entries shall be substituted , namely :-

(a) AdneinistrativeOfficer-48 in respect of pams in theCentral Office, Heavy Water Board.

AdministrativeOfficer- his respect of posts in the Centret Office, Heavy Water Board.

"4. Posts in Heavy WaterBoard (Central Office). andProjetts or Plants thereunder ..

(b) The respective AdministrativeOfficer-III inrespect of posts under theirrespective control in field offices ofHeavy Water Projects or Plants (Kota, Baroda, Tatcher andManuguru).

The respective Administrative Officer-III in respect of posts under theirrespective centrel infieldoffices ofHeavy WaterProjects orPlants (Kota,Baroda, Talcher andManuguru).

Administrative Officer - H in respect of posts under Heavy Water Plants (Tuticorin).

(c) Administrative Officer-III in respect ofposts under Heavy Water Plants (Tuticorin).

All Chief Administrative Officer, Heavy...Water Beard

All Chief General Managers/ General Managers in respect of posts under their respective control in field offices of Heavy Water Projects or Plants (Kota , Barodą , Talcher andManuguru).

Associate Director (0 ).: Heavy Water Board ( CO).... in respect of posts undes . Hoavy Water Plants (Tuticoria)"

F.No. 1/6 ( 1 )/2002- Vig/ 136] RADHIKA RASTOGI, Dy . Secy.

amber S.O. 4017 dated the Note: The Principal Order was published in the Gazette of India, Part II , Section 3, Sub- section ( ii ) vide mumber 13thOctober, 2005.

4398

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9, 2008/SRAVANA 18 , 1930

पर्यावरण एवं वन मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 23 जुलाई , 2008

का.आ. 2153.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप-नियम (4) के अनुसरण में पर्यावरण एवं वन मंत्रालय के नियंत्रणाधीन क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , पश्चिम क्षेत्र , केन्द्रीय पर्यावरण भवन , लिंक रोड नं. 3 , ई-5 , रविशंकर नगर , भोपाल-462016 ( मध्य प्रदेश ) , जिनके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , को अधिसूचित करती है ।

[ सं. ई -11011 /2/2003 - रा.भा. ( का. ) ] जय नारायण , निदेशक ( राजभाषा ) MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS New Delhi , the 23rd July, 2008

S.O. 2153. In pursuance of sub - rule (4) of Rule, 10 of the Official Language ( Use for official purpose of the Union ) Rule, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the Regional Office, Western Region, Kendriya Paryavaran Bhavan , E- 5 , RavishankarNagar , Bhopal -462016 (M.P.) , an office under the administrative control ofthe Ministry ofEnvironment and Forests, whereof80% staff have acquired working knowledge ofHindi .

[No. 11011 /2/2003 - O.L. ( I ) ] JAI NARAIN , Director ( O.L. )

वस्त्रमंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 30 जुलाई, 2008

का.आ. 2154. केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के प्रयोग के लिए ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप- नियम (4) के अनुसरणा में वस्त्र मंत्रालय के अंतर्गत आने वाले निम्नलिखित कार्यालय को जिसमें 90 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का. कार्यसाधक्षक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , को अधिसूचित करती है :

दि जूट कार्पोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया लि. प्रधान कार्यालय , कोलकाता

[सं. ई-11016/1/2005 - हिन्दी] भूपेन्द्र सिंह , संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF TEXTILES New Delhi , the 30th July, 2008

$ .O. 2154.- In pursuance of sub - rule ( 4) of Rule , 10 of the Official Language ( Use for official purpose of the Union) Rule, 1976, the Central Governrnent hereby notifies the following office under the Ministry of Textiles , whereof more than 90% staffhave acquired working knowledge ofHindi:

JuteCorporation of India Ltd. HeadOffice , Kolkata

[No.E - 11016/1 /2005 -Hindi ] BHUPENDRA SINGH , Jt . Secy.

जल संसाधन मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 24 जुलाई , 2008

का.आ. 2155.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप- नियम (4) के अनुसरण में इस मंत्रालय के संगठनों के निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को, जिनके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारीवृन्द के हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है :

राष्ट्रीय जल विकास अभिकरण 1 अन्वेषण वृत्त , भुवनेश्वर राष्ट्रीय जल विज्ञान संस्थान

2 क्षेत्रीय केन्द्र जम्मू, राष्ट्रीय जल विज्ञान संस्थान नेशनल प्रोजेक्ट्स कन्स्ट्रक्शन कारपोरेशन लि.

3. पटना जोन , नेशनल प्रोजेक्ट्स कन्स्ट्रक्शन कारपोरेशन लि. , 15 , आई.ए.एस. कालोनी , द्वितीय तल, किदवईपुरी , पटना-800001 ( बिहार )

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] 4. एनसीआर जोन/यूनिट , नेशनल प्रोजैक्ट्स कन्स्ट्रक्शन कारपोरेशन लि. , बी-7 , सेक्टर-44 , नोएडा-201303 ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) 5. पटेल वेस्ट यूनिट , नेशनल प्रोजेक्ट्स कन्स्ट्रक्शन कारपोरेशन लि. , वल्लभभाई पटेल चेस्ट इंस्टीट्यूट , दिल्ली विश्वविद्यालय , छात्रा मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110007

6. मध्य प्रदेश क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय , प्लाट सं. 9 , नव दूरसंचार कालोनी, भोपाल-462016 ( मध्य प्रदेश )

[सं. 1/1 /2008-हिन्दी ]

राजकुमारी देव , निदेशक ( रा.भा. ) MINISTRY OF WATER RESOURCES New Delhi , the 24th July, 2008

S.O. 2155. In pursuance of sub -rule (4) of Rule 10 of theOfficial Language ( Use for official purposes of the Union) , the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of this ministry the 80% staff whereof have acquired working knowledge ofHindi :

National Water Development Agency 1. Investigation Circle, Bhubneshwar

National Institute of Hydrology 2. Regional Office , Jammu , N.I.Η.

National Project Construction Corporation Ltd.

3. Patna Zone, NPCC Istd . , 15 , 1.A.S. Colony, IInd Floor , Kidwaipuri , Patna- 800001 ( Bihar)

4. N.C.R. Zone/Unit , NPCC Ltd. , B7 , Sector -44, Noida- 201303 ( Uttar Pradesh)

5. Patel Chest Unit , NPCC Ltd. , Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, Delhi University, Chhatra Marg, New Delhi- 110007

6. M.P. Zone , Plot No. 9, Nav Doorsanchar Colony , Bhopal- 462016 ( Μ.Ρ. )

[No. 1/ 1 /2008 -Hindi ] RAJKUMARI DAVE, Director ( O.L. ) कृषि मंत्रालय

( कृषि एवं सहकारिता विभाग ) नई दिल्ली , 21 जुलाई , 2008

का.आ. 2156.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप-नियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में कृषि एवं सहकारिता विभाग , कृषि मंत्रालय के नियंत्रणाधीन दलहन विकास निदेशालय , भोपाल को जिसके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है :

दलहन विकास निदेशालय , छठी मंजिल , विन्ध्याचल भवन , भोपाल-462004 ( मध्य प्रदेश ) [सं. 3-6/2004- हिन्दी नीति] पंकज कुमार , संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE (Department of Agriculture and Cooperation) New Delhi , the 21st July , 2008

S.O. 2156. In pursuance of sub - rule ( 4) ofRule 10 of the Official Language ( Use for official purposes of the Union ) Rule, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the Directorate of PulsesDevelopment , Bhopal under the control of the Department ofAgriculture and Cooperation . Ministry of Agriculture , 80 % staffwhereof have acquired working knowledge ofHindi .

Directorate of Pulses Development , 6th Floor , Vindhyachal Bhawan, Bhopal -462004 (Madhya Pradesh)

[No. 3-6/2004-Hindi Neeti] PANKAJ KUMAR, Jt. Secy .

4399

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9 , 2008/श्रवण 18 , 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

उपभोक्ता मामले , खान और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

( उपभोगायले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली , 14 मार्च, 2008

का.आ. 2157. केप्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित शधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधाने हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें) बाट और माप मामक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) और बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वास प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स विश्वास इण्डस्ट्रियल प्रोडक्टस, जेसर रोड, शिव तेजकिरण अपार्टमेंट, सावरकुण्डल-364515 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता वर्ग ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले ' वी आई पी. पीएफ. 02 ' श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचक सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम ' वी आई पी ' है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन विह आई एन डी/09/07/478 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल एक बिकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित वोलन ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 किलो ग्राम और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 किलो ग्राम है । इसका सत्यापन माफ्मोन अंतराल 50 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेवतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत्त व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लाईट इमिटिंग डायोड तोलन परिणाम 'उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है

PRODUCTS

VISHWANINDUSTE

मॉडल के इंडिकेटर को तल पर बने छिद्र जो इण्डिकेटर के ऊपरी भाग तक जाता है , में से सीलिंग तार डालकर और दूसरी ओर तल के प्लेट पर बने छिद्र से डाली जाती है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का एक विशिष्ट सीमेटिक डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह स्रोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन' उपकरण भी होंगे' जो 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज मेंमैं सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित ५० किलो ग्राम और 5,000 किलो ग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक यात्रापात्मक, पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (266)/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4400

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs )

New Delhi , the 14th March , 2008

S.O 2157.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of " VIP.PF.02 " series of high accuracy (Accuracy Class - 11 ) and with brand name V I P " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Vishwas Industrial Products , Jesar Road , " Shiv " Near Tejkiran Apartment , Savarkundala- 364 515 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approved mark IND/09/07/478 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1,000 kg . and minimum capacity of 1 kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 50 g . It has a tare device with a 100per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

VISHWASINDUSTRIALPRODUCTS

The indicator of the model is sealed through the sealing wire passed from botttom hole run over the top part of the indicator and passed through the other side of the bottom plate . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similarmake, and performance of same series with maximum capacity range above 50 kg and up to 5,000 kg , and with number offverification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2×10k or 5x10 , k being a positive or nagative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 (266 )/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4401 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9 , 2008/श्रावण 18 , 1930

नई दिल्ली, 14 मार्च, 2008

का.आ. 2158. केन्द्रीय सरकार की, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्'यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें) बाट तथा माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) और बाट तथा माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की भास 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदन सक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स विश्वास इण्डस्ट्रियल प्रोडक्टस, जेसर रोड , शिव तेजकिरण अपार्टमेंट, सावरकुण्डल -364515 , मुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्चः यथार्थता (यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले ' वी आई पी. टी. टी. -02 ' श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचक सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपर्करण (टेवलटीप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम ' वी. आई पी. ' है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमीदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/477 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 किलो ग्राम और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्राम है । इसका सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल 2 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लाईट इमिटिंग डायोड सहेलम परिणाम उम्रदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 बोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल की सीलिंग स्वाम्पिंग प्लेट के तल और ब्रॉडी के साईड भाग के सामने की ओर छिद्र करके की जाती है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का एक विशिष्ट सीमेटिक डायग्रामः ऊपर दिशा गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12) द्वारा प्रदस्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा.•सेसे 50 मि. ग्राम के 'ई' मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्राम या उससे अधिक के' ई ' मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में, सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलो ग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 ×40*, 2× 10* या 5× 10" , के हैं , जो धनात्मक सा ऋणात्मक पूपर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 266) /2007 ]

आर. माधुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4402

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii))

New Delhi , the 14th March , 2008

S.Q. 2158. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type ) with digital indication of " VIP.TT.02 " series of high accuracy (Accuracy Class - II ) and with brand name "VIP" ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Vishwas Industrial Products , Jesar Road , "Shiv" Near Tejkiran Apartment, Savarkundala- 364 515 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approved mark IND/09/07/477 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg. and minimum capacity of 100 g. The verification scale interval (e) is 2 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

VISHWASINDUSTRIALPRChalis SAVARKUNDLA

Vi

30Kg100g.2

The model is sealed through the holes made in the opposite side of the stamping plate in the bottom and side part ofthe body. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg. and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg . to 50 mg . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or nagative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (266)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4403 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/श्रावण 18 , 1930

नई दिल्ली , 26 मार्च , 2008

का.आ. 2159.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 को 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मीट्रिक स्केल्स , ( ओल्ड 26 ) 53 , लश्कर स्ट्रीट , रेलवे स्टेशन रोड , अलंदुर, चेत्रई -600 016 तमिलनाडु द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले ' एम एस - टी बी' श्रृंखला के अंकंक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम ' मीट्रिक' है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/454 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ;

i

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इनकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्राम है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयेतुलन युक्ति है जिसको शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता, डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का विशिष्ट स्कीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण-पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा . तक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन 'मापमान अंतराल ( एम ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम तक की अधिकतम क्षमत्ता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 % , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 190 )/2007 ]

आर. माधुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2823 GI /08-8 4404

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)]

NewDelhi , the 26th March, 2008

S.O. 2159.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " MS - TB " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy Class - III ) and with brand name "Metric " (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Metri Scales , (Old 26) 53 , Luscar Street , Railway Station Road, Alandur , Chennai - 600 016 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 07 /454;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

3.000

METRIC

The sealing has been done at the bottom side of the machine to preventrent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy , design , circuit diagram, working principle etc. A typical schematic diagram of the sealing arrangement of the model has been given above .

: Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with verification scale interrval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or nagative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F.'No. WM -21 ( 190)/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4405

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9, 2008/ श्रवण 18 , 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 26 मार्च , 2008

का.आ. 2160.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधाम हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा (7 ) और ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मीट्रिक स्केल्स , ( ओल्ड 26) 53 , लएंकर स्ट्रीट, रेलवे स्टेशन रोड, अलंदुर , चेन्नई-600 016 तमिलनाडु द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यमं यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले ' एम एस पी एफ' श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम ' मीट्रिक' है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/455 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल एक बिकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) तोलम उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि.ग्रा. है । इसका सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव हैं । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

7

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को सील करने के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलबन्द भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता, डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का विशिष्ट स्कीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

!:

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र . के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, 'विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तीलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के ' ई ' मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक तथा 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10* या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जहां पर ' के ' जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (190 )/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4406

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART 11-SEC . 3(ii )]

New Delhi , the 26th March, 2008

S.O. 2160. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the CentralGovernment hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type) with digital indication of " MS- PF " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy Class - III ) and with brand name "Metric " (herein referred to as the said model) , manufacturedby M/ s . Metri Scales , (Old 26) 53 , Luscar Street , Railway Station Road, Alandur, Chennai -600016 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 07 /455 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg and minimum capacity of4kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 200g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

1 The sealing has been done at the Back side of indicator using wire and lead the machine to prevent the opening 01 the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram, working principle etc. A typical schematic diagram of the sealing arrangement of the model has been given above .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval(n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 % or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or nagative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM -21 ( 190)/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4407 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अगस्त 9, 2008/ श्रावण 18, 1930

नई दिल्ली, 4 अप्रैल , 2008

का.आ. 2161.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधाने हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स तोशनीवाल हिवाक प्रा.लि. , 4डी/6 , इंडस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट , अम्बातूर , चैन्नई-600 058 , तमिलनाडु द्वारा विनिर्मित ' ओसीएम ' श्रृंखला के पानी के अलावा अन्य द्रव्यों हेतु प्रयोग में आने वाला मीटर ( मैकेनिकल फ्लो मीटर ) के मॉडल का और जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम ' तोशनीवाल ' है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/59 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है।

मीटर को सील करने के लिए , मीटर के पीछे की ओर चार पेंच होंगे जिनके तल के दो पेंच में छेद होगा जिसमें लीडतार डाली आएगी जो स्टाम्प और सील के सत्यापन हेतु उपलब्ध किए गए अन्य दो पैंचों के साथ लगाई जाएगी । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

मॉडल ' पानी के अलावा अन्य द्रव्यों हेतु प्रयोग में आने वाला मीटर ' जो सूचक के तुल्यदार है । यह । कि.ग्रा. सें.मी. से 25 कि.ग्रा ./सें.मी. तक की दाब रेंज में कार्य करता है । इसका अधिकतम प्रवाह दर 80 लीटर/ घंटा है और न्यूनतम प्रवाह दर 1 लीटर/घंटा है । मापमान के सिद्धांत घनात्मक विस्थापन टाइप है । मीटर 7 अंकों तक आयतन को दर्शाता है तथा लघुतम स्केल अंतराल 10 मि.लीटर है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के मीटर भी होंगे जिसकी अधिकतम प्रवाह दर 80 लीटर/ घंटा से 600 लीटर/घंटा की रेंज में न्यूनतम प्रवाह दर 1 लीटर/ घंटा से 10 लीटर/घंटा की रेंज सहित तथा प्रवाह मीटर की अभिहित साइज 4 मि.मी. , 8 मि.मी. और 15 मि.मी. वाले हैं ।

[फा. सं.' डब्ल्यू एम-21 (273 ) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4408

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[ PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ].

New Delhi , the 4th April, 2008

S.O., 2161. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to renden accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of ( Mechanical Flow Meter) 'Meter for Liquids other than water ' of series " OCM " and with brand name " TOSHNI WAL " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s . Toshniwal Hyvac Pvt . Ltd. , 4D/6 , Industrial Estate , Ambattur, Chennai -600058 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/59;

Toshniwal

OIL CONSUMPTION METER

For sealing there are four screws at the rear side of the meter , out of which two bottom screws have a hole and passes by the leaded wire with another two screws provided for the verificaion of stamp and seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The model is a ' Meter for liquids other than water' with a analogue indicator and working in the pressure range of 1kg/ cm² to 25kg/ cm² with a maximum flow rate of 80 litre /hour and minimum flow rate of 1 litre/ hour . The principle of measurement is positive displacement type . The meter indicates the volume up to 7 digits and smallest scale interval is 10ml .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the other types of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with a maximum flow rate in the range of 80 litre/hour to 600 litre/hour and with a minimum flow rate in the range of 1 litre /hour to 10 litre /hour having the nominal size of the flow meter of 4mm , 8mm and 15min manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials , with which , the said approved model has been inanufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (273 )/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4409

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9, 2008/ श्रावण 18, 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नईदिल्ली, 4 अप्रैल , 2008

का.आ. 2162.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्तमॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सनसुई इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स प्रा.लि. , 89/1 , भवानी पेठ, पुणे, महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " सी एस-01 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( क्रेन प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सनसुई " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एम डी/09/08/43 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है;

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 1 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधैयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

क्रेन स्केल को सीलिंग करने के लिए फ्रन्ट और बैंक बाडी को सीलिंग बोल्ट्स छेद में से निकाल कर जोड़ दिया गया है । इन बोल्टों को टाइट करके इनमें से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर दोनों ओर लीड से सील किया गया है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का स्कीमवार डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. अथवा उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से ऊपर और 25 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 अथवा 5 × 10 , के हैं , जहां पर ' के' धनात्मक वा ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यके समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 263 )/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4410

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 4th April , 2008

S.O. 2162.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self indicating , non-automatic , (Crane type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " CS - 01 " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class-III ) and with brand name " SANSUI " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Sansui Electronics Pvt. Ltd. , 89/1 , Bhawani Peth, Pune , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/08 /43 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of5000 kg. and minimum capacity of 20kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 1kg . It has a tare device with 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

For sealing the crane scale the front and back body is joined by the sealing bolts through the holes . After tightening these bolts a steel wire is passed through these bolts and is sealed by the lead on both the sides . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity from 5 tonne to 25 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k isa positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 263 ) /2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4411 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजयव: अगस्त 9 , 2008/श्रावणा 18, 1930

नई दिल्ली , 4 अप्रैल , 2008

का.आ. 2163.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे(नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 को 60 ) तथा बाटं और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस हाद की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अंब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धास 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- बारा (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स केलकैब्स एंड वोयाज प्रा. लि. , प्रथम तल , पुष्पगिरी, 10वा क्रॉस , 12वां ब्लाक, कुमार पार्क वेस्ट, बंगलौर-560 020 द्वारा विनिर्मित " कोब्बस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित टैक्सी किराया मीटर के मॉडल का, जिसकै ब्रांड का नाम " केलकैब्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एक डी/09/08 /60 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र-पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है;

उक्त मॉडल " अंकक सूचन सहित टैक्सी/मीटर (लग्जरी ) " है जो सम्मय और दूरी मापने का उपकरप्म है । यह यात्रा के किसी भी क्षण यात्री द्वारा संदेय प्रभार को निरंतर जोड़ता रहता है और उपदर्शित करता रहता है । यात्रा के दौरान कतिषय विनिर्दिष्ट चील से ऊपर और विनिर्दिष्ट चाल के नीचे चली गई दूरी के किराए की देय करने का फंक्शन है । उपकरण में आवती मुद्रण सुविधा के साथ व्हीकल ट्रैकिंग और संचार प्रणाली जैसी विशेषताएं भी हैं । मूल्य संरचना को नियंत्रण कक्ष से साफ्टवेयर के माध्यम से रूप दिया जा सकतादिया जा सकता है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल सी डी) मीटर की रीडिंग उपदर्शित करता है और पावर सप्लाई 9 बोल्ट से 24 बोलद डीसी है । के" घटक 1274 प्रल्स, कि.मी. है । मीटर सीलिंग के लिए तल प्लेट और टैक्सी मीटर के अपर कवर में छिद्र करके लीड वायर से बाँध कर सील का सत्यापन किया जाता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 129 )/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2823G1/08-9 4412

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 4th April, 2008

S.O. 2163. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of " Taxi Meter " with digital indication (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) of " COBBS " series with brand name " CELCABS " manufactured by M/s. Celcabs & Voyages Private Limited, # 30 , 1st Floor , Pushpagiri , 10th Cross , 12th Block , Kumara Park West , Bangalore -560 020 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08 /60;

The said model of " Digital Taxi Meter ( Luxury ) " is a measuring instrument which totalizes continuously and indicate the fare , at any moment of journey, the charges payable by the passenger of a public vehicle as function of the distance travelled, and below a certain speed on the length of the time taken ; this being independent of supplementary charges according to the authorized tariffs . The equipment also has features like vehicle tracking and communication systems with receipt printing facility . The pricing structure can be configured only through the software from the control room/over the air . The reading of the meter is indicated by Liquid Crystal Diode Display ( LCD ) and the power supply is 9V to 24V DC. The ' K ' factor of the Taxi meter is 1274 pulses per kilometer .

For sealing the meter body holes are being made at the bottom plate and the upper cover from the rear side of the taxi meter and a leaded wire is fastened for receiving the verification seal . The meter cannot be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

[F. No. WM -21 ( 129)/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4413

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/श्रावण 18 , 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 19 मई , 2008

का.आ. 2164.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी एन डब्ल्यू एम. एल , मिडलसैक्स, यूनाइटिड किंगडम द्वारा जारी माडल अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र के साथ उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा ब्राट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों की' प्रयोग' करते हुए मैसर्स ए एंड डी कम्पनी लिमिटेड , 3-23-14 , हिगासी - इकेबुकुरो , तोशिमा - कू, टोक्यो -170 0013 , जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थती ( यथार्थता वर्ग-1 ) वाले " FX- i " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के माइल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ए एंड डी कम्पनी लिमिटिड" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और भारत में बिना किसी परिवर्तन या परिवर्धन के मैसर्स एवन वेइंग सिस्टम लि. , 15 -' बी ' विंग , कमल कुंज, मेघा एच एस जी सोसायटी, एस वी रोड , अंधेरी ( प ), मुंबई-400 058 द्वारा बिक्रित और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/220 समनुदेशित किया गया है ,

उक्त माडल एक इलेक्ट्रो मेगमेटिक फौर्स कम्प्रेशन सिद्धांत पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 220 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 मि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापनः मापमान अंतसल (ई ) 1 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक अधेमतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलम प्रभाव है । वैक्यूमः फ्लोरेसेंट डिस्पले ( वी एफ डी) प्रदर्श तोलन मरिणामः उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । :

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री, यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम निष्पादन सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की. उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत डिजाइन को अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालम के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन माममीन अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 * अथवा 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 102 )/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4414

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 19th May, 2008

SO . 2164. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said repor figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( ou of 1975 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval the model of non - automatic ( Table top type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " FX - i " series of special accuracy ( accuracy class -I ) and with brand name "A & D Company Limited " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M /s A & D Company Limited , 3-23-14 , Higashi- Ikebukuro , Toshima - ku , Tokyo - 170.0013 , Japan and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/s Avon Weighing Systems Ltd. , 15 , ' B ' Wing , Kamal Kunj , Megha HSG Soc. , S.V. Road , Andheri (W), Mumbai -400 058 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/220;

The said model is an Electro Magnetic Force Compensation based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 220g. and minimum capacity of 100mg. The verification scale interval ( e) is Img. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Vacuum Florescent Display ( VFD) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V, 50 1ız alternative current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material, accuracy, design , circuit diagram , working principle etc. before or after sale.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . and with number of verification scale interval ( n) equal to or more than 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k, 2x10 or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design , accuracy and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 102 )/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4415 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/श्रावण. 18 , 1930

नई दिल्ली, 19 मई, 2008

का.आ. 2165.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखखें ) ब्राट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का. 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावत्ता है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेंको इलेक्ट्रोनिक्स , सेक्टर-2 , कसौली रोड , परवानू-173 220 , हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -11 ) के 'एस ए एम एस-220' श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " सेंको " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/299 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणापत्र जारी करती है ।

COING

Min:0.20g

Model:SAMS-220

MAX:220g

Ac:II

e:0.01g

है । उक्त माडल एक इलेक्ट्रो मेगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पेनसेशन प्रिसिपल पर आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 220 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 0.20 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन माषमान अंतराल ( ई) 0.01 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टिल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तीलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

201 स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन, सर्किट डायग्राम , निष्पादन सिद्धांत आंदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है किउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10* , 2× 10 अथवा 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 148 ) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4416

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 19th May, 2008

S.O. 2165. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of " non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) " with digital indication of " SAMS - 220 " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - 11 ) and with brand name" SANCO " ( herein referred to as the said model) manufactured by M/ s . Sanco Electronics , Sector - 2 , Kasauli Road, Parwanpo - 173 220 , H.P. and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/299 ;

SANCOELECTRONICS

Model:SAMS-220

MAX:220g

Min:0.20g.

Ac:1Ⅱ

e:0.01g

The said model is an Electro Magnetic Force Compensation Principle based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 220g and minimum capacity of 0.20g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 0.01g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its materials , accuracy , design , circuit diagram , working principle etc. before or after sale .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10k or 5x10 % , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model have been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM -21 ( 148 )/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4417

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9 , 2008/श्रवण 18 , 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 19 मई , 2008

का.आ. 2166.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट सर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट औरमाप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेंको इलेक्ट्रोनिक्स , सेक्टर -2 , कसौली रोड, परवानू 173 220 हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता (सथार्थता वर्ग- III ) के ' एस ए के एल -500 ' श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचका, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकारण (प्लेटफार्म प्रकाश कि.ग्रा. /लीटर) जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " सेंको" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/300 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमाडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार कि.ग्रा. /लीटर ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि.ग्रा. हैं और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति हैजिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड़ ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता, डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम, निष्पादन सिद्धान्त आदि की शतों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रगत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान,अंतशल (एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. 'तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मानें 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 या 5× 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 148 ) /2007 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4418

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 /SRAVANA 18 , 1930

New Delhi , the 19th May, 2008

S.O. 2166. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self indicating, non - automatic (Platform Type- kg / litre ) weighing instrument with digital indication of " SAKL- 500 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " SANCO " ( herein referred to as the said model ) manufacturedby M/s. Sanco Electronics , Sector- 2 , Kasauli Road , Parwanoo - 173 220 , H. P. and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/300 ;

LEECTRONICS

SANCO ELECTRONICS

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type - kg/litre) with a maximum capacity of 500 kg and minimum capacity of 1kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 50g. It has a tare device with 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy , design , circuit diagram , working principle etc. before or after sale .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 , for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 %, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 148 )/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 4419 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत ... राजपत्र : अगस्त 9,308/ श्रावण 18 , 1930.

नई दिल्ली , 19 मई , 2008

का.आ. 2167.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिर्पोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट तथा माप मानक अधिनियम,1,19761 ( 1976 को 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बातस. बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- भ्राय ( 7 ) और उप- धारा (8 ) द्वारा सक्तियों को प्रोग्र करते हुए मैसर्स सैंको इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स , सेक्टर-2 , कसौली रोड, परवानू-173 220 हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थ बथार्थता वर्ग -117 ) के' एस ए पी एम -500' श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार) जिसके ग्राण्डका नाम " सेंकी " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) , जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /07/301 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

Model:SAPM

MAX:500kg

Ac

Min1kg

e:50g

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि. ग्रा. है सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई) 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उम्रदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत्त प्रदाय पेर कार्य करता है । 1 स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , निष्पादन सिद्धान्त आदि की शर्तों परर परिवर्ति नहीं किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का श्रेयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मर्क , 'यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मोपमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 किलोग्राम से 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 2 × 105 या 5 × 10% , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 148 ) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2823 G1 /08-10 4420

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 9 , 2008 /SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[ PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 19th May , 2008

S.Q. 2167. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self indicating, non- automatic , ( Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of "SAPM - 500 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III) with brand name " SANCO " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M / s . Sanco Electronics , Sector -2, Kasauli Road, Parwanoo - 173 220 , H.P. and which is assigned the aproval mark IND/09 /07/301 ;

SANCOELECTRO RONICS Model:SAPM

MAX:500kg

Ac:IIIⅢ

Min:1kg

e:50g

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of $ 00kg. and minimum capacity of 1kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 50g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram , working principle etc. before or after sale .

: Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and upto 5000kg . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM -21 ( 148 )/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4421

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 19 मई, 2008

का.आ. 2168.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, यह1.यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्तरिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट तथा बाप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और साप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुस्य है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातर प्रयोग की आगमि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा (7 ) और उप- धारा (४ ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेंकों इलेक्ट्रोनिक्स , सेक्टर-2 , कसौली रोड , परवानू-173 220 हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) के ' एस ए डब्ल्यू बी-30' श्रृंखला के, अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज प्रकार ) जिसके जाप कर माम " सेंको " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है.) जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/302 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रभाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमाडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित (वेब्रिज प्रकार) सोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 टन है और म्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई) 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेवतुलन युक्ति हैं जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा बिद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री, यथार्थता , डिजाइन, सर्किट डायग्राम , निष्पादन सिद्धान्त आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा की उपधारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया। गयगया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखलाश्रृंखला केके वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो. 5 ग्राम या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन माफ्मान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधि क और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10* , 2× 10* या 5 × 10", के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 148 )/2007 ]

आर. माधुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4422

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9, 2008/SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]

New Delhi , the 19th May, 2008

SO. 2168.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic, weighing instrument (weighbridge type ) with digital indication of " SAWB -301 " series belonging to medium accuracy ( Accuracy class- III) and with brand name " SANCO " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Sanco Electronics , Sector- 2, Kasauli Road, Parwanoo- 173 220 , H.P. and which is assigned the aproval mark IND/ 09/07/302;

000

SANCO

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( veighbridge type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 tonne and minimum capacity of 100kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 5kg . It has a tare devicewith a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its materials , accuracy, design , circuit diagram , working principle etc. before or after sale .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and upto 100 tonne with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5x10k, being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model have been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM -21 ( 148 )/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 4423 [ भाग 1 ]-खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगसा 9, 2008/ श्रावण 18, 1930

नई दिल्ली, 19 मई 2008

का.आ. 2169.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसें प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह संमाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट तथा माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) कऔर उप- बारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सैंको इलेक्ट्रॉनिक्स, सेक्टर-2 , कसौली रोड , परवानू-173 220 हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) के ' एस ए डब्ल्यू सी -30 टी' श्रृंखला के हाइब्रिड प्रकार के अस्वचालित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज के लिए कन्वर्सन किट ) जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम" सेंको " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/07/303 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित हाईब्रिड टाइप अस्वचालित ( वेब्रिज के लिए कन्वर्सन किट ) तोलन उपकरणं है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आर्धयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 बोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन की कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री, यथार्थता, डिजाइन, सर्किट डायग्राम, निष्पादम सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

1 और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और, उसी सामुग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यक्षार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,006 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मॉन 1 × 10 , 2× 10* या 5 × 10% , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणोस्त्मक 'पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 148 ) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरखूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञानः 4424

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/SRAVANA 18 , 1930

New Delhi , the 19th May , 2008

S.O.2169 .- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of hybrid type non- automatic , weighing instrument (conversion kit for weighbridge ) with digital indication belonging to medium accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) of "SA WC- 30T" series with brand name " SANCO " (herein referred to as the said model ), manufacturedby M/s. Sanco Electronics , Sector-2 , Kasauli Road, Parwanoo - 173 220 , H.P. and which is assigned the aproval mark IND/09 /07/303;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based hybrid type non - automatic weighing instrument ( conversion kitforfor weighbridge ) with a maximum capacity of 30 tonne and minimum capacity of 100kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 5kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its materials , accuracy , design , circuit diagram, working principle etc , before or after sale .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and upto 100 tonne with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 5kg or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5410k, kibeing the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which . the said approved model have been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 148 )/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4425 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) )

भारत का राषेयंत्र : अगस्त 9, 2008/ श्रवण 13 , 1930

नई दिल्ली, 19 मई , 2008

31 का.आ. 2170.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान ही गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई अकृकि देखें काट तुथा मात्र मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुक्ा है और इस आत की संभावना है कि लमाद्वार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेंकों इलेक्ट्रोनिक्स, सेक्टर-2, कसौली रोड , परवान- 173 220 हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) के ' एस ए एच एस -50 ' श्रृंखला के स्वतः (सूचक अस्त्रासित, अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( हंगिय टाइप) जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " सेंको" है (जिसे इसमें 'इसके पश्चात् उक्तमॉडल कहां गया है) जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 0/7/304 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन साप्रमात अंतराल (ई ) 5.आा, है । इसमें एक अधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक कामोड (एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय गए कार्य करता है

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सौलबंद भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता, डिजाइन, सर्किट डायग्राम, निष्पादने सिद्धांत आदि की शतों पर परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्छ शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत डिकाइत के अनुस्मर और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या. उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 500 किं.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 " , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 % , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 148 )/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4426

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

New Delhi, the 19th May, 2008

S.O. 2170. Whereas , the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of the self indicating , non-automatic (Hanging type ) weighing instrument with digital indication of series ' SAHS - 50 ' of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) with brand name " SANCO " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Sanco Electronics , Sector - 2 , Kasauli Road, Parwanoo - 173 220 , H.P. and which is assigned the aproval mark IND/09/07/304;

C

Min 3001:

MAXCap.50kg

SANCOELECTRONICSPARWANOO

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 50 kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with 100 percent subtractive retained tareeffect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its materials, accuracy , design , circuit diagram , working principle etc. before or after sale .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of same series with maximum capacity up to 500kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model have been manufactured .

[F. No. WM -21 ( 148 )/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 14427

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9,2008/ श्रावण 18, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नईदिल्ली, 19 मई, 2008

का.आ. 2171. केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वास उसे प्रस्तुत्त रिपोर्टपर कारो कोपरा अह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माय मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 तथा बाट और माप मलक | ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सैवा प्रदान करता रहेगा אינווהנ to borng 150 अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (2) और जमलाय (३ ) द्वारा अडत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेंकों इलेक्ट्रोनिक्स , सेक्टर-2 कसौली रोड, मरवा 173 220 हिमाल प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यमभार्थता ( धार्थता वर्ग-3 )"के 'एस ए सी एस-10 टी श्रृंखला को अस्वचालित अकर्क सूचन सहित सोलन उपकारण क्रीम स्कल टाइप ) जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " सेंको" है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) जिसे अनुमोदन चिह आई एवं 89/66/67/305 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक बिकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल प्रिंसिपल आधारित अस्वचालित ( क्रेन टाइप ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 2 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारिंत आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अदिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों को लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद.बाद में उसकी सामग्री, यथार्थता , डिजाइन, सर्किट डायग्राम, निष्पदिम सिद्धति'आदि का शतीपर परिवर्तित नहीं किया _____ - 38 31 ??????? છછછ છ ???* of be जाएगा ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का अयोग करते सुरुःयह घोषणा करती है। किउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत डिलाइत को अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला को वैसे ही ब्रेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक केो रेंज में सस्थापन पापमान अंतराल ( एम ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 50 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 के हैं जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मकऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 148 )/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञांन 2823 GI/08-11 4428

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/SRAVANA 18 , 1930

NewDelhi , the 19th May, 2008

S.O. 2171. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model Is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval ofnon - automatic weighing instrument (Crane Scale Type) with digital indication of ' SACS - 10T' series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name "SANCO" (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Sanco Electronics , Sector- 2 , Kasauli Road , Parwanoo-173 220 , H.P. and which is assigned the aproval mark IND/09/07/305 ;

BANCO ELECTRONICS

Thesaid model is a strain gauge type load cell principle based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Crane type) with a maximum capacity of 10 tonne and minimum capacity of 40kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 2kg. It has a tare device with 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevent opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit diagram , working principle etc. before or after sale .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity Above 50kg and up to 50 tonne and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value 1 ×10 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model have been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM -21 ( 148 )/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology

11 小 4429 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18, 1930

नई दिल्ली, 13 जून, 2008

का.आ. 2172.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर मिररने के समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट तथा माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा चार्ट और माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

ל

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 के तीसरे परन्तुक की उप - भाय ( 7 ) और उप- धारा (8 ) द्वास शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स लार्सन एंड टुब्रो लि. डिपार्टमेंट ईबी जी एस की यू 3 /पी डी की, पोवई वर्स, साकी मिठा रोड , मुंबई-400 072 द्वारा विनिर्मित " स्प्रिंट" श्रृंखला के इलेक्ट्रोनिक डिस्पेंसिंग पम्प अकंक सूचन सहित के माडल का, किसके ब्रॉड का माम एल एड टी " है ( जिले इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) औ जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एम डी/09/08 / 125 सममुर्देशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

कथित माडल एक इलेक्ट्रानिक डिस्पेसिंग पम्प है जो घनात्मक विस्थापण मीटर को सिद्धांत पर कार्य करता है । पम्प में एक, दो अथवा बहु उत्पाद हैं जो दो से दस नोजल तक हैहै और तेल मिक्स स्थि से 130 लीटर प्रति मिनट एकल/डबल मिटरिंग इकाई के लिए है और । इसका अधिकतम प्रवाह दर 90 लीटर प्रति मिनट अधिकतम प्रवाड़ पर 90 प्रति के लिए है और यूनान प्रबंध पर 04 लीटर प्रति मिनट रूपए में 7 अंकों की राशि, 7 अंकों में लीटर की मात्रा, 6 काम करनेवालसेटलाइजर के लिए 12 अंकों का अंकन है .। इन मापनों के अंकनों को द्रष क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी डिस्पले पर परिणाम उप है । उपकरण 220 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज/प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । इसमें फ्यूल के बहुभिस्म को डिस्पेंस करने में सक्षम है अर्थात बिना सौसायुक्त पेट्रोल , डीजल , इथोनल , एच एस डी, बायो-डीजल , केरोसीन , तारपीन का तेल इत्यादि । इस मॉडल मेंहमें कथित पंट्रोलियम उत्पादों की डिलीवरी के लिए पूर्व सेट सुविधा भी है।

पंप को सील करने के लिए एक सौल तार को 2 पेंच में डाली जाएगी जिसका उपयोग सेंसर बाक्स कोको कलेस्त क्ररने के लिए किया जाता है, 2 पेंच जिनका उपयोग टोटलाइजर कवर और टोटलाइजर लोचदार शाफ्ट नट को लगाने के लिए किया जाता है तथा दूसरी सील तार को 2 पेंचों के जरिए प्रत्येक 4 सिलिंडर कवर तथा पहिए , सिलिंग पिन और समायोज्य सिलिंडर कवर को समायोजित करते हुए किया जाएगा । उक्त मांडल में विद्युत यांत्रिक टोटलाइजर है । इसमें इलेक्ट्रानिक अंशांकन सुविधा, कार्ड रीडिंग और मुद्रण सुविधा भी हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 57 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4430

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 13th June , 2008

S.O, 2172. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approvalof Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to sub - section (3 ) and sub - sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby approves , issues and publishes the certificate of approval of model of Electronic Dispensing Pump with digital indication ( hereinafter referred to as said model ) of series ' SPRINT' with brand name " L & T" , manufacturedby M/ s . Larsen & Toubro Limited, Dept .: EBG- SBU 3 / PDD, Powai Works , Saki Vihar Road, Mumbai - 400072 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/08 / 125;:

4

For sealing the pump one seal wire is passed through 2 screws used for clamping sensor box , 2 screws used for mounting totalizer cover and totalizer flexible shaft nut and another seal wire is passed through 2 screws each on 4 cylinder covers and also through adjusting wheel , sealing pin and adjustable cylinder cover. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The said model is consists of electro - mechanical totalizer . It is also having electronic calibration facility , card reading and printing facility.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 57 ) /2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4431:

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9, 2008/ श्रावण 18, 1930 ;

नई दिल्ली, 13 जून , 2008

का.आ. 2173.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहितप्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आंकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों की अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बातबात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माँइल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धास ( ४ ) द्वास शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स तिरूपत्ति बालाजी स्केल्स कॉम; 298, बैंक वाली गली , आजादपुर विलेज , दिल्ली -110033 द्वारा विनिर्मित " टी बी एस " मृखला के कॉउंटर मशीन के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का भाम "महाराजा " है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डौं/09/08/ 127 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक कांउटर मशीन है जो लिवर के सिद्धांत पर कार्य करता है जिसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि.ग्रा. है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण-पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जिनकी क्षमता 1 कि.ग्रा. , से 50 कि. ग्रा. तक है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 31 )/ 2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक मापः विज्ञान 4432

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9, 2008/ SRAVANA 18, 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 13th June , 2008

S.O. 2173. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of counter machine of series "TBS" and with brand name " MAHARAJA" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) manufactured byM/ s .Tirupati Balaji Scales Com. , 298 , Bank Wali Gali , Azadpur Village, Delhi- 110033 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/127;

The said model is a Counter Machine working on the principle of lever with a maximum capacity of 10 kg.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 1 kg to 50 kg manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (31 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4433 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9,2008/ श्रमण 18 , 1930

:

नई दिल्ली, 13 जून , 2008

का.आ. 2174.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा: 1 अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की आरा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा (8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एम सी आर कारपोरेशन , 2651 , सैटेलाइट बोलेबेड , दुलुम , जोर्निया 30096 , यू एस ए द्वारा विभिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) बाले ' रीयलस्येन 7878 ' श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( टेवलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " एन सी आर " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) जिसे मैसर्स एन सी आर कारपोरेशन इंडिया ( प्रा. ) लि., 501 ए, लैंडमार्क सोरन रोड चकला, अंधेरी ( ईस्ट) मुंबई -400 093 को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के भारत में विपणित किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एम डी/ 13 /08 / 114 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित स्केनर कम अस्वचालित तोलम उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 15 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आर्थयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका रात प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक भारित आधेयतुलम प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपवर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्टें और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । 4

सील करने के लिए दो दिन छेद एक स्टील काबर होता है जो अंशांकन पहिया कवर करता है और दूसरा स्थिर प्लैंट पर होता है । इन दोनों छेत्रों में एक तार डाली जायेगी तथा सील की जाएगी ताकि सील कवर को नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सील करने के उपबंध का एक प्रारूपी योजनाबद्ध डायनाम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

- और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है किउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तो उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मिः ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन आपमान अंतराल (एम ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " माम 1 × 10%, 2 × 10* या 5 × 10*, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णौक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 56 )/2008 ]

आर. माधुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4434

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 13th June , 2008

S.O 2174. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approvalof Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render acqurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument(Tabletop type) with digital indication of " Realscan 7878 " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " NCR " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s . NCR Corporation , 2651 , Stalellite Blvd, Duluth, Georgia 30096 , USA and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M /s.NCR Corporation , India ( P) Limited , 501 A, Landmark Soarn Road Chakala , Andheri ( East ) , Mumbai -400 093 Maharashtra and which is assigned the aproval mark IND/ 13/ 08/ 114;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based scanner cum non - automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with a maximum capacity of 15 kg . and minimum capacity of 100 g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 5 g. It has atare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD ) display indicates the weighing result. Apart from normal weighing, the weighing scale can be used for price computing through key board data entry facility. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Forn sealing there are two pin holes one is at the steel cover, covering calibration wheel and the other is on the fixed plate Awire is passed through both of these holes and a seal is applied to it , so that the steel cover can not be opened . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for e ' value of 100 mg. to 2g . and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value I × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the sarne principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model have been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM -21 ( 56) /2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology i

4435 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

नई दिल्ली , 20 जून, 2008

का.आ. 2175.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा ब्राट और माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल 'यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सिटीजन वेगिंग सिस्टम , 4/8 , बड़ौदा इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , गोरवा, बडौदरा , गुजरात द्वारा उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -11 ) . 'के ' सीडब्ल्यूएस ' श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) और जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " स्केल - टेक " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) , जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 08 / 118 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफाम प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

बॉटम प्लेट में किए गए हॉल के माध्यम से और स्केल के सामने सीलिंग की जाती हैं, उसके बाद इन छिद्रों में से एक तार को पास किया जाता है और तार पर लीड सील फ़िक्स की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही भेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलम उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. अथवा उससे अधिक के " ई " माम के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तर्क की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " भान 1 × 10* , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 19 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2823 G1 /08-12 4436

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9, 2008 /SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 20th June , 2008

S.O. 2175.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approvalof Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions :

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument(Platform type) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy Class - II ) of series " CWS" and with brand name " SCALE - TEC" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M / s . Citizen Weighing System , 4/8 , Baroda Industrial Estate, Gorwa, Vadodara , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08 / 118 .

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 300kg . and minimum capacity of 1kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 20g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

A1360 Sealing is done through the hole made in the bottom plate and front of the indicator , then a wire is passed through these poles and the lead seal is fixed in the wire . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and up to 5000 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50000 for ' e ' value of 100mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5× 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model have been manufactured

[F. No. WM-21 ( 19)/2008 ]

R MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4437 [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9, 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

नई दिल्ली, 20 जून , 2008

का.आ. 2176. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा (7 ) और उर्फ धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स चाइना नेशनल एरो - टेक्नोलॉजी, इंपोर्ट एण्ड एक्सपोर्ट कॉपीरेशन , " कैटिक " जुहाल, गांगडिनी , चाइना द्वारा विनिर्मित और मैसर्स सिटीजन वेगिंग सिस्टम , 4/8 , बरौडा इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , गौरवा, वडौदरा , गुजरात द्वारा भारत में बिक्री के पहले अथवा बाद में बिना किसी बदलाव के मार्केटिड विशिष्ट यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -1 ) के ' एसएबी' श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचना सहित , अस्वच्ालिद तोलान उपकरण ( टेबलदाप प्रकार ) और जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " स्केल- टेक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) , जिसे अनुमोदनःचिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/117 सम्रनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती हैं

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रों मैगमेटिक फोर्स कम्पनसेशन प्रिंसिपल पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 ग्रा. हैं और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 मि. ग्रा. है । । मि.ग्रा. ( डी ) मान के साथ सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 1 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा बिद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । A1362

बॉटम प्लेट में किए गए हॉल के माध्यम से और स्केल के सामने सीलिंग की जाती है , उसके बाद इन छिद्रों में से एक तार को पास किया जाता है और तार पर लीड सील फिक्स की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम नीचे दिया गया है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्तअनुमोदितःमॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. अथवा उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 अथवा उससे अधिक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णकि या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 19 )/ 2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4438

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18, 1930

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 20th June, 2008

S.O. 2176.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (tabletop type ) with digital indication of special accuracy ( Accuracy class - I ) of series " SAB " and with brand name " SCALE -TEC" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/ s . China National Aero -Technology , Import and Export Corporation , " Catic" Zhuhal , Gaungdeny, China and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/s . Citizen Weighing System , 4/8 , Baroda Industrial Estate , Gorwa, Vadodara , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08 / 117;

The said model is an electro magnetic force compensation principle based non - automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with a maximum capacity of 300 g . and minimum capacity of 100mg. The verification scale interval ( e) is Img with the value of' d' Img . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alterative current power supply.

Class 1

SCALETEC

Max. 300g Min.0.1g img

A1362

Sealing is done throught the hole made in the bottom plate and front of the scale , then a wire is passed thorugh these holes and the lead seal is fixed on the wire . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above. 1

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 50000 or above for ' e ' value of 1 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model have been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 19) /2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

4439

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

नई दिल्ली , 20 जून , 2008

का.आ. 2177.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधाम हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट तथा माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बार्ट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987087 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बातबात की संभावना है कि लगातारं प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेंगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा (7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स सिटीजन वेगिंग सिस्टम , 4/8 , बडौदा इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , गोरवा, बडौदा, गुजरात द्वारा मध्यमः यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) के" एस टी सी' श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन 'उपकरण ( क्रेन प्रकार) जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " स्केल टेक " है (जिसें इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08 / 119 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती हैं । उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( क्रेन प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 2 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

A1359

बॉटम प्लेट में किए गए हॉल के माध्यम से और स्केल के सामने सीलिंग की जाती है उसके बाद इन छिद्रों में से एक तार को पास किया जाता है और तार पर लीड सील फिक्स की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम नीचे दिया गया है । और, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत 'उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही भेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्राम अथवा उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 500 किलोग्राम से अधिक और 50 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 * , क़े हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मकः पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 19 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4440

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9, 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 20th June , 2008

S.O. 2177. Whereas , the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic, weighing instrument (Crane type) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " STC" and with brand name ' SCALE - TEC" (herein referred to as the said model ), manufacturedby M / s . Citizen Weighing System , 4/8 , Barodda Industrial Estate , Gorwa , Vadodara, Gujarat and which is assigned the aproval mark IND / 09/08/ 119 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Crane type) with a maximum capacity of 10 tonne and minimum capacity of 40 kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 2kg . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing resulı . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

SCALETEC

A1359

Sealing is donethrough the hole made in the bottom plate and front of the indicator, then a wire is passed through these holes and the lead seat is fixed on the wire. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given below.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declare that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and perormance of same series with maximum capacity above 500kg and upto 50 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5× 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 19 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 41 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9, 2008/श्रावण 18, 1930

नई दिल्ली , 20 जून , 2008

कि का.आ. 2178.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लूगात्ग्रह प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा,

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स बेनफिट इंस्ट्रूमेंट, # 46-9-27 , रामालयम स्ट्रीट, डोन्डाप्रार्थी , विशाखापत्तनम-16 आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता , वर्ग- II ) के ' बी एफ -जे पी' श्रृंखला के अंक्‌क सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार) और जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " बेनफिट" है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) , जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/ 168 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त माडल एक विकृत गंज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

तुला के सूचक की बांयी और सामने की तरफ सामने के टॉप कवर और बॉटम प्लेट को काटकर 2 छिद्र किए जाते हैं जिसे सत्यापन स्टम्पऔर सील प्राप्त करने के लिए एक लीडेड बायर द्वारा कस दिया जाता है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का टाइपिकल सिमेटिक डायग्राम नीचे दिया गया है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती हैकि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्राम से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. अथवा उससे अधिक के " ई " के लिए 5000 से 50,000 की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एम ) के साथ 50 कि.ग्र . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान के 1 × 10*, 2× 10* या 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 73 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरखूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4442

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1910

[PART II- SEC. 3( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 20th June , 2008

S.O. 2178.-Whereas , the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Meas :res Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuraen over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions :

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic, weighing instrument (Tabletop type ) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy class - 11 ) of series " BF- JP " and with brand name " BENFIT " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufacturedby M / s . Benefit Instruments # 46-9-27, Ramalayam Street , Dondaparthy, Vishakhapatanam - 16 , A.P and which is assigned the aproval mark . IND/09 /08 / 168 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type band cell based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . the verification scale interval ( e ) is 2g it has a tare device with a 100 per centsubtractive retained tare effect. The Light Eating Diode ( LED ) display indicatesthe weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative ement power supply .

BENFIT

On the front len side of the balance 2 ledes are brade by cotting the front tapaver and bottom plate which is Lastened by a lejaded wire for receiving the veroticarion stamp and seal the instant be opened without tampering the seal , A typical schendatie dagram of seit israon of the model is given abu

of the said Act , the Central the weighing instruments of verification scale interval Further, in excrcise of the powered by sub-sechon ( 11 ) of No Government hereby declares that this certite ale of approval of the said model shall day similarmake , accuracy and peronnance dots with maximumcapacity upto (n) in the range of 100 ta 50,000 for' e ' values fog to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 5000 value of 1 > 10,2-10 ° ors - 10 , e positive or negative whole manufacturer in accordance se principle , design and with del has been manufactinel to 50,000 for' e value of 100mg or more ana vite number or equal to zero , manufactured by the set the same materials with which, the said appa

f. No WM -21 (73 )-20081 Virector ofLegal Metrology

11 4443 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

नई दिल्ली, 20 जून, 2008-

का.. 2179.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् वह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाढ़ और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 कीउप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों कों प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स बेनफिट इंस्टरूमेंट , 46-9-27 , रामालयम स्ट्रीट, डोन्डायाथी , विशाखापतनम-16 आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) के ' बीएफ-टीबी' श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) और जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " बेनफिट" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) , जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन. डी/09/08 / 169 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

BENE

BENFIT

उक्त माडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण (टेबल टाप प्रकार है) । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारिप्त आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

तुला के सूचक की बांयी और सामने की तरफ सामने के टॉप कवर और बॉटम प्लेट को काटकर 2 छिद्र किए जाते हैं जिसे सत्यापन स्टम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए एक लीडेड वायर द्वारा कस दिया जाता है । माडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का टाइपिकल सिमेटिक डायग्राम नीचे दिया गया हैः ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्राम से 2ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. अथवा उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) के साथ 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10के या 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (73 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 2823 G1 /08-13 4444

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9, 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 20th June , 2008

S.O.2179 .- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic , weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of " BF - TB " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name BENIFIT " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Benefit Instruments 46-9-27, Ramalayam Street, Dondaparthy, Vishakhapatnam - 16 , A.P.and which is assigned the aproval mark IND/09 /08 / 169 ;

BENTIT

BENFIT

BENFIT

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrinstrument ( Tabletop type) with amaximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz altemative current power supply .

On the front left side of the balance 2 holes are made by cutting the front top cover and bottom plate which is fastened by a leaded wire for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in acordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 73 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

4445

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

नई दिल्ली , 20 जून , 2008

का.आ. 2180.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नींचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानकं (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा; }

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा (8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स बेनफिट इंस्ट्रूमेंट, # 46-9-27 , रामालयम स्ट्रीट , डोन्डाप्राथी , विशाखापतनम-16 आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) के ' बीएप- पीपी' श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) और जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " बेनफिट" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) , जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/08 / 170 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

BENFIT

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 600 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2.5 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

तुला के सूचक की बांयी और सामने की तरफ सामने के टॉप कवर और बॉटम प्लेट को काटकर 2 छिद्र किए जाते हैं जिसे सत्यापन स्टम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए एक लीडेड वायर द्वारा कस दिया जाता है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का टाइपिकल सिमेटिक डायग्राम नीचे दिया गया है ।

\ और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्राम अथवा उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 50,000 की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) के साथ 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10* , 2× 10* , 5 × 10* , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 73 ) /2008 ].

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4446

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 9 , 2008 /SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 20th June , 2008

SO . 2180.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to tender accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic , weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - 11 ) of series " BF - PP " and with brand name "BENFIT " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Benfit Instruments, # 46-9-27 , Ramalayam Street, Dondaparthy, Vishakhapatnam - 16 , A.P. and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /08 /170;

BENFIT

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Plateform type ) with a maximum capacity of 600kg and minimum capacity of 2.5 kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 50g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effeect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Onthe front left side of the indicator of the balance 2 holes are made by cutting the front top cover and bottom platewhich is fastened by a leaded wire for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The instrument can not be opened withoudt tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 5000 kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with 'e ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10k of 5× 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in acordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 73 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4447 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

नई दिल्ली, 20 जून , 2008

का.आ. 2181.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्तरिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स बेनफिट इंस्ट्रूमेंट , # 46-9-27 , रामालयम स्ट्रीट, डोन्डाप्राथी, विशाखापतनम-16 , आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) के ' बीएफ- पीएफ' श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफॉर्म प्रकार ) और जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " बेनफिट!" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) , जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/08/ 171 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

BENFIT

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्त्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

तुला के सूचक की बांयी और सामने की तरफ सामने के टॉप कवर और बॉटम प्लेट को काटकर 2 छिद्र किए जाते हैं जिसे सत्यापन स्टम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए एक लीडेड वायर द्वारा कस दिया जाता है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का टाइपिकल सिमेटिक डायग्राम नीचे दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री सै , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. अथवा उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) के साथ 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 या 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (73 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] 4448

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

New Delhi , the 20th June , 2008

S.O. 2181. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModel ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic , weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series "BF - PF " and with brand name " BENFIT " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s . Benefit Instruments , # 46-9-27 , Ramalayam Street, Dondaparthy, Vishakhapatanam - 16 , A.P.and which is assigned the aproval mark IND/09 /08 / 171 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 4 kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 200g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

BENFIT

On the front left side of the indicator of the balance 2 holes are made by cutting the front top cover and bottom plate which is fastened by a leaded wire for receiving the verification stamp and seal. The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and perormance of same series with maximum capacity ahove 50kg. and upto 5000 kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5× 10k where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in acordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (73 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4449 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

नई दिल्ली, 26 जून , 2008

का.आ. 2182.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और मापं मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स चावला इंटरप्राइसेस , रामनगर गुरूद्वारे के पास , तोहाना , हरियाणा-125120 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले एम टी टी श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ओरिसन गोल्ड" है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) , और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2007/333 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देंखे ) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित ( अस्वचालित टेबल टांप प्रकार का) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यर्थाथता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , कार्यकारी सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों के संबंध में परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । मॉडल के सीलिंग का विशिष्ट स्कीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से, जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम'क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5× 10* , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 168 )/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4450

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 26th June , 2008

S.O. 2182. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic , weighing instrument (Tabletop type ) with digital indication of " MTT " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " ORISON GOLD" (herein referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s . Chawla Enterprises , Ram Nagar, Near Gurudwara, Tohana , Haryana- 125 120 and which is assigned the aproval mark IND/09/07/333 ;

ORISONGOLO

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with amaximum capacity of 20kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effeect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevant opening of the machine for fraudulent practices and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design , circuit, diagram , working principleetc. before or after sale . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provisin of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg. and with number of verification scale interval (h) in the range of 100 to 50000 for ' e ' value of Img. to 50mg . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in acordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM -21 ( 168 )/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4451 [ भाग II- खण्ड, 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

नई दिल्ली, 26 जून , 2008

का.आ. 2183.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स चावला इंटरप्राइसेस , रामनगर गुरूद्वारे के पास , तोहाना , हरियाणा-125120 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले एम टी टी श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित स्वतः सूचक तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ओरिसन गोल्ड है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 07/334 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी और प्रकाशित करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें) एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अम्वचालित तौलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के मुद्रांकन के अतिरिक्त मशीन को कंपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोलने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद भी किया जाएगा और मॉडल को बिक्री से पहले या बाद में उसकी सामग्री , यथिता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , कार्यकारी सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों के संबंध में परिवर्तित नहीं किया जाएगा । मॉडल के सीलिंग के इडिंकेटर का विशिष्ट स्कीम डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और 'केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से , जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. अधिक और 5000 कि. ग्रा.तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान के 1 × 10 , 2 × 10* या 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 168 )/2007]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 2823 G1/08-14 4452

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9, 2008 /SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 26th June , 2008

S.Q. 2183. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the CentralGovernment hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of self indicating, non -automatic , (Platform type) weighing instrument with digital indication of " MTP " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " ORISON GOLD " ( herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Chawla Enterprises, Ram Nagar, NearGurudwara, Tohana, Haryana- 125 120 and which is assigned the aproval mark IND/ 09 /07/334 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 300kg. and minimum capacity of 1kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 50g . It has a tare device with 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

In addition to sealing the stamping plate sealing shall also be done to prevant opening of the machine for fraudulent practice and model shall not be changed in terms of its material , acc design, ciruit diagram,working principle etc. before or after sale . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision o . ator ofthe model is given above.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and up to 5000 kg . and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with 'e' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negativewhole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (168)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

4453

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली , 31 जुलाई , 2008

का.आ. 2184.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खखंड ( ख) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं: -

स्थापित भारतीय मानकों की संख्या वर्ष

क्रम सं.

औरशीर्षक

औरवर्ष

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों यदि कोई हो की संख्या

आई एस 4716: 1993

1. आई एस/आई एस ओ 7492 : 1992

दंत एकसप्लोरर

जून, 2008

इन भारतीय मानकों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 ,, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों, नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पुणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं:

[संदर्भः एमएचडी/जी-3.5 ] राहुल कुमार, वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( एवं एच डी)

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

NewDelhi , the 31st July, 2008

S.O. 2184. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :-

Sl.No.

No. and Year of the Indian Standard Established

(1)

(2)

(3) 1.

IS4716:1993

IS/ISO 7492 : 1997 Dental Explorers

SCHEDULE

Date of established

No. and year of Indian Standards , if any , superseded by the new Indian Standard

(4)

June, 2008

Copy of these Standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards ; Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Officers: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandirgarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad , Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar , Combatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: MHD/G-3: 5] RAHUL KUMAR, Scientist ' F' and Head (MHD)

नई दिल्ली , 1 अगस्त, 2008

का.आ. 2185.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) नियम , 1988 के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधि सूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं : -

स्वीकृति करने लाईसेंसधारी का नाम व पता क्रम लाइसेंस संख्या संख्या कीतिथि

वर्ष/माह

2

1

3

4

1. 7823685 26-2-2008 दिलीप सोनीगांरा ज्वैलर्स ( एचयूएफ ) गोल्ड क्राफ्ट, क्र.सं. 280 दुकान नं-1 , ग्राउंड फ्लोर , श्रीधर नगर , चिंचवड, पुणे-411033 2.

28-2-2008 बोथरा एग्रो इक्यूपमेंट प्रा. लि.

7823887

प्लॉट नं , बी -16 , एमआईडीसी

नगर - मनमाड रोड , जिला

अहमदनगर-414111

अनुसूची

भाग अनुभाग वर्ष भारतीय मानक का शीर्ष

भा.मा. संख्या

6

8 5

7

9

1417

1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता और चिह्नांकन

4984

1995 पेयजल आपूर्ति के लिए उच्च घनत्व पॉलिथिलीन

पाइप्स 4454

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18, 1930

8

9

4

5

6

7

2

3

1

2000

1417

3. 7824485 3-3-2008

स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी -शुद्धता और चिह्नांकन

चिंतामणी ज्वैलर्स साई लीला अपार्टमेंट्स, दुकान नं. 3 चाफेकर चौक कामथ हास्पिटल के पास , चिंचवडगांव , पुणे -411033

1999 4-3-2008

4. 7824788

स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , 1417 आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता और चिह्नांकन

सोपान निवुत्ति मैद सोनार लेन एट एंड पोस्ट लोनी- बीके तालुका- राहाता, जिला, अहमदनगर-413736

2000

4985

5-3-2008

5. 7825386

पेयजल आपूर्तिम हेतु अप्लास्टिकपीवीसी पाइप्स

जलधारा एग्रो प्लॉस्ट प्रा. लि. ए-19/ 1 , एमआयडीसी चिंचोली तालुका-मोहोल , जिला सोलापुर, 413736

2000

4985

5-3-2008

6. 7825487

पेयजल आपूर्ति हेतु अप्लास्टिक पीवीसी पाइप्स

भदिय एग्रो पाइप्स , गट सं. 81 / 1 ए/ 1 गटचीवाडी, बारसी, तालुका, बारसी जिला सोलापुर-413401

2004

14543

27-2-2008

7. 7819795

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

स्कायटॉस इंडस्ट्रीज , गट सं. 1194/1195 वडकी , तालुका- हवेली, जिला पुणे

14543

2004 12-3-2008

8. 7824687

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

चैतन्य नीर जल प्रा. लि. गट सं.77 , एट फारोला तालुका पैठन , जिला औरंगाबाद-431005

1417

1999 17-3-2008

9. 7827289

पेठ, सातारा -415002 श्रद्धा ज्वेलर्स , 85 , सदाशिव

स्वर्ण और मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण शिल्पकारी-शुद्धता और चिह्नांकन

1999 19-3-2008

10. 7828190

स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , 1417 आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता और चिह्नांकन

यू. के. ज्वैलर्स , दुकान नं. 5,6,7 और 8 सीटीएस नं. 438, स. नं. 2/1 , पीएमटी स्टैंड , कोथरूड, जिला पुणे-411038

185

1786

24-3-2008

7828493

11.

क्रंक्रीट रीइन्फोर्समेंट के लिए उच्च शक्ति विरुपित स्टील की छडें व तारें

रुतुजा इस्पात प्रा. लि. प्लॉट नं. डी-67 , एडीशनल एम आयडीसी जिला जालना-431203

1992

13488

25-3-2008

इमीटिंग पाइप्स सिस्टम

12. 7829192

रामदास इरीगेशन सिस्टम प्रो. लि. गट सं. 465/बी, मालेगांव थाडी तालुका कोपरगांव , जिला अहमदनगर

2004

14543

26-3-2008

13. 7830177

पैकेजबंद पेयलजल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )

फीलफ्रेश एग्रो प्रा. लि. गट सं. 121 /2बी, निर्मलानगर, पोस्टतिलकनगर , तालुका राहाता जिला अहमदनगर-413720

1

2002

6595

28-3-2008

14. 7831482

किर्लोस्कर आइल इंजिन्स लि. तलेरा जंक्शन , 151 , पुणे सासवड रोड गांव फुरसुंगी तालुका हवेली जिला पुणे-412308

क्लीयर , कोल्ड वाटर भाग 1 कृषि एवं ग्रामीण जल आपूर्ति के उद्देश्यों के लिए होरीजोंटल सेंट्रीफ्यूगल पम्पस

2004

14543

31-3-2008

15. 7822986

पैकेजबंद पेयलन (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

विनायक फूड एवं एग्रो इंडस्ट्री क्र. सं. 74/4/बी , भादगांव रोड, गांधीगलाज , जिला कोल्हापुर-416502

[सं. सीएमडी/ 13: 11 ]

पी. के. गम्भीर, उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर )

New Delhi, the Ist August, 2008

4455

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9; 2008/ श्रावणः 18 , 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 1st August , 2008

S.O. 2185. In pursuance ofsub - regulation (5 ) ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification ) Regulations, 1988 , ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule:

Sl . No. Licence No.

Grant Date

Name and Address of the Party

4

3

12

26-2-2008

1. 7823685

Dilip Sonigara Jewellers (HUF) Gold Croft, S. No. 280 Shop No. 1 , Ground Floor Shridhar Nagar , Chinchwad, Pune-411033

28-2-2008

2. 7823887

Bothara Agro Equipments Pvt . Ltd. Plot No. B- 16, MIDC Nagar-Manmdad Road , District Ahmednagar -414111..

3. 7824485 3-3-3008 Chintamani Jewellers , Sai LeelaApartments , Shop No. 3 Chapekar Chowk, Near Kamat Hospital Chinchwadgaon , Pune-411033 4. 7824788 4-3-3008 Sopan Nivrutti Maid Sonar Lane, At & Post Loni - BK , Taluka Rahata District Ahmednagar-413736

5-3-2008

5. 7825386

Jaldhara Agro Plast Pvt . Ltd. A- 19 / 1 , MIDC Chincholi Taluka Mohol District Solapur-413006 6. 7825487 5-3-2008 Bharadiya Agro Pipes Gat No. 81 / 1 / A/ 1 Gatachiwadi , Barshi Taluka Barshi , District Solapur-413401 7. 7819795 27-2-2008 Skytas Industries Gat No. 1194/1195 Wadki Taluka Haveli District Pune 8. 7824687 12-3-2008 Chaitnya Neer Jal Pvt. Ltd. Gut No. 77, At Pharola , Taluka Paithan District Aurangabad-431005 9. 7827289 17-3-3008 Shradha Jewellers 85 , Sadashiv Peth , Satara-415002 10. 7828190 19-3-3008 U.K. Jewellers Shop No. 5, 6 , 7 and 8 CTS No. 438, S. No. 2/1 , PMT Stand, Kothrud, District Pune-411038 11. 7828493 24-3-2008 Rutuja Ispat Pvt . Ltd. Plot No. D- 67, Addl . Midc District Jalna -431202

SCHEDULE

Title of the Standard IS No. Part Section Year

8

9

6

7

5

1999 Gold and gold alloys , 1417 jewellery/artefacts- Fineness and marking

1995

4984

High density poly- ethylene pipes for potable water supplies

1999, Gold and gold alloys , 1417 jewellery/artefacts- Fineness and marking

1999

1417

Gold and gold alloys, jewellery/artefacts- Fineness and marking

2000

4985

Unplasticised PVC pipesforpotable water supplies

4985

2000 Unplasticised PVC pipes for potable water supplies

2004

14543

Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

2004

14543

Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

1999 Gold and gold alloys , 1417 jewellery/artefacts- Fineness and marking

1999 Gold and gold alloys , 1417 jewellery/artefacts- Fineness and marking

185

1786

High strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement 4456

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 /SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] 4

2

6

1

3

5

7

8 9 12 7829192 25-3-2008

1992

Emitting pipes system 13488

Ramdas Irrigation Systems Pvt. Ltd. Gat No. 465/B, Malegaon Thadi , Taluka Kopargaon , District Ahmednagar

13 7830177 26-3-2008

14543

2004

Packaged drinking

Feelfresh Agro Pvt . Ltd. Gut No. 121 /2B , Nirmalnagar , PostTilaknagar, Taluka Rahata

water(Other than packaged natural mineral water)

14, 7831482 28-3-2008

1

2002

6595

Horizontal centrifugal pumps for clear , cold

Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. Talera Junction , 151 Pune Saswad Road , Village Phursungi , Taluka Haveli , District Pune-412308

water Part 1 Agri- cultural and rural water supply purposes

2004 15 7822986 31-3-2008

Package drinking water 14543 (Other than Packaged natural mineral water)

Vinayak Food & Agro Industries S. No. 74/4 /B , Bhadgaon Road, Gadhinglaj District Kolhapur-416502

[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ]

P. K. GAMBHIR, Dy . Director General ( Marks)

नई दिल्ली, 4 अगस्त, 2008

का.आ. 2186.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम, 1988 के विनियम ( 5 ) के उपविनियम ( 6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को इनके आगे दर्शायी गई तारीख से रद्द/स्थापित कर दिया गया है :-

अनुसूची

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

क्रम से

लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत कस्तु/प्रक्रम सम्बद्ध भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

रद्द/स्थागित करने की तिथि

लाइसीस संख्या सीएम/एल

9-6.-2008

1. 7089279

भामा. 6538 : 1971

मंगलम कोइल्स प्रा. लि. प्लांट,

प्रतिस्कंदी सामग्री से बने तीन प्लग

नं. 11 , 16 किलोमीटर स्टोन गेट संख्या-100 गांव फरोला औरंगाबाद, पैठन रोड, जिला औरंगाबाद-431137

24 7697710

भामा 9271 :2004

29-5-2008

कृषि फार्म की मोरी के लिए

प्लास्टिक पाइप

रेक्स पॉलीक्स्टूशन लिमिटेड प्लॉट नं. एच-5/ 1 एवं 2 एल-7 , 8 और 9 एमआयडीसी कुपवाड एरिया, जिला सांगली-416436

भामा 10001 : 1981

4-6-2008

3, 7836290

सामान्य प्रयोजनों के लिए समगत

किर्लोस्कर ऑइल इंजिन्स लिमिटेड डी-1 , स्टार एमआयडीसी कगल जिला कोल्हापुर-413202

संपीडन प्रज्जवलन ( डीजल ) इंजिन की कार्यकारिता अपेक्षाएं ( 20 किवा तक)

[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 13 ]

पी. के. गम्भीर , उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर )

New Delhi , the 4th August , 2008

S.O. 2186.- In pursuance of sub- regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulations 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which are given below have been cancelled/with effect from the date indicated against each .

SCHEDULE

Name and address of the Licensee

Date of cancellation Sl . No , LicenceNo.

Article/Process with relevant Indian Standards covered by the licence cancelled

4

5

12

3

9-6-2008

1S6538: 1971

17089279

Three pin plugs made of

resilient material

Mangalam Coils Pvt . Ltd. , Plant No. 11 , 16 km . Stone Gut No. 100 Village Farola , Aurangabad Paithan Road, District Aurangabad -431137 4457

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

4

5

2

3

1

29-5-2008

IS9271 :2004

2. 7697710

Farm drainage plastic pipes

Rex Polyextrusion Ltd. , Plot No. H-5/ 1 and 2 L-7 , 8 and 9 MIDC Kupwad Area, District Sangli 416436

4-6-2008

IS10001:1981

3. 7836290

Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. , D- 1 , StarMIDC, Kagal , District Kolhapur-413202

Performance requirements for constant speed compression ignition (diesel ) engines for general purposes (up to 20 kW)

[No. CMD/13: 13 ]

P. K. GAMBHIR, Dy. Director General (Marks)

नई दिल्ली, 4 अगस्त, 2008

का.आ. 2187.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खण्ड (ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए है वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम सं. स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

नए भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

30अप्रैल 2008 1. आई एस 3025 ( Part 61 ) :2008 जल और अपशिष्ट जल के नमूने लेने तथा परीक्षण ( भौतिक एवं रसायन) की पद्धतियां भाग 61 सकल ओर मुक्त कार्बन

डाइऑक्साइड ( पहला पनुरीक्षण )

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , पटना , पुणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : सी एच डी 32/आई एस 3025 ( Part61 ) ]

ई. देवेन्द्र, वैज्ञा. एफ , निदेशक ( रसायन )

New Delhi , the 4th August, 2008

S.O. 2187. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub-rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each .

SCHEDULE

Date of Established Sl. No. No. and year of the Indian Standards Established

No. and year of Indian Standards , ifany, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(4)

(3)

(1)

(2)

30thApril , 2008 1. IS 3025 (Part 61 ): 2008 Methods of Sampling and Test (Physical and Chemical) for water and waste water Part61 Total and Free Carbon Dioxide (FirstRevision)

Copy ofthis Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkatta Chandigarh , Chennai Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbator , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Patna , Pune, Thiruvanthapuram.

[Ref. CHD 32/1S 3025 ( Part 61 ) ]

E. DEVENDAR, Sc. F, Director (Chemical) 4458

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 4 अगस्त, 2008

का.आ. 2188.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए है वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :

अनुसूची

क्रम सं.

स्थापित तिथि

स्थापित्त भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

नए भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

1.

30मई 2008

आई एस 14164: 2008-80°सें से अधिक और 750 सें तक तापमानों के लिए तापरोक्षन सामग्रियों के औद्योगिक अनुप्रयोग और फिनिशिंग - रीति संहिता (पहला पुनरीक्षण )

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ , चेन्नइ , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : सी एच डी 27/आई एस 14164 ] ई. देवेन्द्र, वैज्ञा. एफ, निदेशक ( रसायन )

New Delhi , the 4th August , 2008

$.O. 2188. In pursuance of clause ( b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each .

SCHEDULE

Date of Established Sl .No. No. and year of the Indian Standards Established

No. and year of Indian Standards , ifany , Superseded by the New Indian Standard

30thMay, 2008

1. IS 14164: 2008 Industrial application and finishings of thermal insulation materials at temperatures above -80 °C and upto 750 ° C- Code of practice . (FirstRevision)

Copyofthis Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkatta Chandigarh , Chennai Mumbai and also Branch OfficesAhmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbator , Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur, Patna , Pune , Thiruvanthapuram .

[Ref . CHD 27 /IS 14164 ]

E. DEVENDAR , Sc . F,. Director (Chemical )

नई दिल्ली, 4 अगस्त, 2008

का.आ. 2189.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

स्वीकृति क़रने लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पंता

भाग अनुभाग वर्ष क्रम संख्या

लाइसेंस संख्या

भा.मा. संख्या

भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

कीतिथि वर्ष/माह

3

4

12

6

5

8

7

9 1. 7845392 26-5-2008 निर्मल ज्वैलर्स 3 बी , एम. जी. रोड खडकी, जिला पुणे-411 003

1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, 1417 आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता और चिह्नांकन

2. 7845695 27-5-2008

मलाई निकाला हुआ दूध पावडर भाग । मानक श्रेणी 13334 1998 स्वराज इंडिया इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड स. नं. 406/407 , ए/पी निम्भोर, तालुका फलटन , जिला सातारा-415 523

3.7843893 30-5-2008

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) 14543 2004 सिल्वा बॉटलिंग कंपनी , गट संख्या 402 एट पोस्ट कन्हे, तालुका मावल , जिला पुणे-412 106 4459

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9, 2008/श्रावण 18 , 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

4 1 2

3

2-6-2008

4. 7847295

आदिनाथ स्टील री - रोलिंग मिल प्लॉट नं. ए-28/5 , एडीशनल एमआइडीसी, जिला जालना-431 203 5. 7849505 10-6-2008 जयहिंद पॉलीमर्स प्रा. लि. प्लॉट नं बी-1 ( 33 , 34 , 37 , 38 ) , बी-5 एवं बी-6 , जुन्नर को- आपरेटिव इंडस्ट्रीयल इस्टेट ए/पी कांडाली , तालुका जुन्नर , जिला पुणे-412 412 6. 7849606 9-6-2008 फिनोलेक्स इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड (उरसे पाइप डिवीजन ) गट संख्या 399 , गांव उरसे तालुका मावल , जिला पुणे-410506

13-6-2008

7. 7849808

बोरावके फूड्स एंड बेवरेजेज प्लॉट नं. ए-17, एमआयडीसी तलेगांव गांव नवलख उम्बरे , तालुका मावल , जिला, पुणे-410507

16-6-2008

8. 7849909

वर्धमान पॉलीक्सटूशन , ए-24/1 , एमआइडीसी, चिंचोली, तालुका मोहोल, जिला सोलापुर-413 255 17-6-2008

9. 7845594

डावरे फूड्स एण्ड बेवरेजेज प्रा. लि. , गट संख्या 2134/2135 , एट पोस्ट यालवी, तालुका तसगांव , जिला सांगली-416 312 10-6-2008

10. 7841889

के. के. एग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज , 4/11/84 पी , हत्तीसिंगपुरा , केट केट गेट रोड, बाबर कॉलोनी के सामने जिला औरंगाबाद-431 001 11. 7851791 20-6-2008 राजेन्द्र ज्वैलर्स (गोल्ड) 98 , पैलेस स्ट्रीट , मोती चौक, जिला सातारा -415 002 12. 7851892 20-6-2008 नारायण दास लक्ष्मण दास एंड संस 6, सदाशिव पेठ , जिला सातारा

20-6-2008

13. 7851993

नरेन्द्र मल्लाप्पा मजाती , 3572/बी, सोनवार पेठ, मिरज-416410 जिला सांगली

24-6-2008

14. 7852490

दिगम्बर काशीनाथ पालकर ब्रदर्स , " पालकर हाउस " , 157 , गुरूवार पेठ, कासड -415 110 जिला सांतारा

25-6-2008

15. 7853391

सिल्वर पैलेस 172 , " सी" वार्ड, भाउसिंगजी रोड , गोल्डन प्लाजा जिला कोल्हापुर-416.002 16. 7845291 21-5-2008 धनलक्ष्मी री - रोलिंग मिल प्लॉट नं. डी-57, एडीशनल एमआईडीसी, जिला जालना-431 203 282361108-1.5

9

6

8

5

7

1985

1786

कांक्रीट रि इन्फोसेमेंट के लिए उच्च शक्ति विरूपित स्टील की छड़ें व तारें

2000

4985

पेयजल आपूर्ति के लिए पाइप्स अनप्लास्टिसाइज्ड पीवीसी

12818

1992 बोर/ट्यूबवैल के लिए अनप्लास्टिसाइज्ड पीवीसी स्क्रीन एवं केसिंग पाइप

2004

14543

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

1995

4984

पेयजल आपूर्ति के लिए उच्च घनत्व के पालिथिलीन पाइप्स

2004

14543

पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

2004

14543

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

1999

1417

स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता और चिह्नांकन

1999 आभूषण शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता और चिह्नांकन स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , 1417

1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, 1417 आभूषण शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता और चिह्नांकन

1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , 1417 आभूषण शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता और चिह्नांकन

1999 :

1417

स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता और चिह्नांकन

1985

1786

कांक्रीट रि इन्फोर्समेंट के लिए उच्च शक्ति विरूपित स्टील की छड़ें व तारें

[सं. सीएमडी/ 13 : 11 ]

पी. के. गम्भीर, उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर ) 4460

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVAΝΑ 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 4th August , 2008

S.O. 2189. In pursuance of sub -regulation (5) of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulations , 1988, ofthe Bureau ofIndian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule:-

SCHEDULE

Part Sec: Year

Title of the Standard

IS No.

Sl Licence No. No.

Grant Date

Name and Address of theParty

4

6

7 8 9

5

12

3

1999 26-5-2008

1417

1. 7845392

Nirmal Jewellers , 3B, M.G. Road, Khadki District Pune-411003

Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- Fineness and marking

2. 7845695

13334

1998 27-5-2008

01

Skimmed milk powder Part 1 Standard grade

Swaraj India Industries Ltd. , S. No. 406/407 A/P Nimbhore Taluka Phaltan District Satara -415523

.2004

14543

3. 7843893 30-5-2008

Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

SilvaBottling Company , Taluka Maval District Pune-412106 GatNo. 402, At Post Kanhe

1985

1786

4.7847295 2-6-2008

High strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement

Adinath Steel Re -Rolling Mill , PlotNo. A- 28/5 Addi MIDC District Jalna 431203

4985

2000 10-6-2008

5.7849505

Unplasticized PVC pipes for potable water supplies

Jaihind Polymers Pvt . Ltd. , Plot No. B 1 (33,34,37,38), B5 & B6 Junnar Co - Op Indl Estate A/P Kandali , Taluka Junnar District Pune-412412

12818

1992 6. 7849606 9-6-2008

Unplasticized PVC screen and casing pipes forbore/tubewell

Finolex Industries Ltd. , (Urse PipeDivision) GatNo. 399 , Village Urse Taluka Maval District Pune-410506

14543

2004 7.7849808 13-6-2008

Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

Borawake Foods & Beverages , PlotNo. A- 17 MIDC Talegaon Village Navlakh Umbre TalukaMaval District Pune-410507

1995

4984

8 7849909 16-6-2008

High density polyethylene pipes for potable water supplies

Vardhaman Polyextrusion , A-24/ 1 , MIDC Chincholi Taluka Mohol District Solapur-413255

2004 9. 7845594 17-6-2008

14543

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged natural miheral water)

Daware Foods & Beverages Pvt. Ltd. , GatNo. 2134/2135 AtPost Yelavi Taluka Tasgaon District Sangli -416312

2004 10-6-2008

14543

10. 7841889

Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water )

KK Agro Industries , 4/ 11 /84P, Hattisingpura Kat Kat Gate Road Opp Babar Colony District Aurangabad-431001 4461

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008 /श्रावण 18 , 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

6

7 8

9 1

2

3

4

5

1417

1999 20-6-2008

11. 7851791

Rajendra Jewellers (Gold) , 98, Palace Street, Moti Chowk District Satara-415002

Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking

1417

1999 12. 7851892 20-6-2008 Narayandas Laxmandas & Sons , 6, Sadadhiv Peth District Satara

Gold and gold alloys , Jewellery/artefacts- Fineness and marking

1417

20-6-2008

1999 13. 7851993

Gold and gold alloys , Jewellery/artefacts- Fineness and marking

Narendra Mallappa Majati , 3572/B , Somwar Peth Miraj -416410 District Sangli

24-6-2008

1417.

14. 7852490

1999 :

Gold and gold alloys , Jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking

Digambar Kashinath Palkar Bros. , 'Palkar House ' 157, Guruwar Peth Karad-415110 District Satara

1999 15. 7853391 25-6-2008

1417

Gold and gold alloys , Jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking

SilverPalace 172, ' C' Ward Bhausingji Road GoldenPlaza District Kolhapur -416002

1786

1985 16. 7845291 21-5-2008 Dhanlaxmi Re-Rolling Mill Plot No. D-57, Addi MIDC District Jalna -431203

High strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement

[ No. CMD/13 : 11 ]

P. K. GAMBHIR, Dy. Director General (Marks )

वाणिज्य और उद्योग मंत्रालय

(औद्योगिक नीति और संवर्धन विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 4 अगस्त, 2008

का. आ. 2190.-केंद्रीय सरकार, पेटेन्ट अधिनियम , 1970 ( 1970 का 39 ) की धारा 117ख और व्यापार चिह्न अधिनियम, 1999 (1999 का 47 ) की धारा 84 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , चेन्नई, दिल्ली , मुंबई और कोलकाता को , ऐसे स्थानों के रूप में विनिर्दिष्ट करती है , जहां पेटेन्ट मामलों की सुनवाई के लिए बौद्धिक संपदा अपील बोर्ड की न्यायपीठ अधिविष्ट होगी ।

[फा. सं. 7 ( 10 )/2007- आईपीआर 1 ( आईपीएबी )

एम. एस. धाकड, निदेशक MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY (Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion) New Delhi , the 4th August , 2008

S.O. 2190- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 117B of the Patent Act , 1970 (39 of 1970 ) and sub- Section (2) ofSection 84 ofthe Trade Marks Act , 1999 ( 47 of 1999 ), the Central Government hereby specifies Chennai , Delhi , Mumbai and Kolkata as the places at which a Bench ofthe Intellectual Property Appellate Board shall sit to hear patent cases .

[F. No. 7(10)/2007- IPRI ( IPAB) ] M. S. DHAKAD , Director

कोयला मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 31 जुलाई , 2008

का. आ. 2191.-केंद्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार में कोयला मंत्रालय के द्वारा जारी की गई अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 4207 तारीख 16 अक्टूबर , 2006 जो भारत के राजपत्र के भाग 2 , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) , तारीख 28 अक्टूबर, 2006 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका माप 817 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 2018.81 एकड़ (लगभग ) है, कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी । 4462

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] है: और केन्द्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विहित उक्त भूमि के भाग में कोयला अभिप्राप्त अतः केन्द्रीय सरकार कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए : -

(क ) इससे संलग्न अनुसूची " क " में वर्णित 9.258 हेक्टेयर ( लगभग ) या 22.88 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप की उक्त भूमि के सभी अधिकार,

(ख ) इससे संलग्न अनुसूची " ख " में वर्णित 357.735 हेक्टेयर ( लगभग ) या 883.96 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप की भूमि में खनिजों के खनन, खदान , बोर करने , उनकी खुदाई करने और तलाश करने , उन्हें प्राप्त करने , उन पर कार्य करने और उन्हें ले जाने के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ।

टिप्पण 1 : - इस अधिसूचना के अधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. एसईसीएल /बीएसपी/जीएम/पीआईजी /लैंड/317 तारीख 7 अप्रैल, 2008 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर, जिला- सरगुजा ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रण , 1 , काउंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता - 700001 के कार्यालय में या साउथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड , ( राजस्व अनुभाग ) सीपत रोड, बिलासपुर 495006 (छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है।

टिप्पण 2: - उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है , जिसमें निम्नलिखित उपबंध हैं:-

अर्जन के बाबत आपत्तियाँ:-

" 8 ( ३ ) कोई व्यक्ति जो किसी भूमि में जिसकी बाबत धारा 7 के अधीन अधिसूचना निकाली गई है, हितबद्ध है , अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्हीं अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के बारे में आपत्ति कर सकेगा ।

स्पष्टीकरणः इस धारा के अर्थान्तर्गत यह आपत्ति नहीं मानी जाएगी कि कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन संक्रियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संक्रियाएं केन्द्रीय सरकार या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नहीं करनी चाहिए ।

! ( 2 ) उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन प्रत्येक आपत्ति सक्षम प्राधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जाएगी और सक्षम प्राधिकारी , आपत्तिकर्ता को स्वयं सुने जाने , विधि व्यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपत्तियों को सुनने के पश्चात् और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जांच , यदि कोई हो, करने के पश्चात्, जो वह आवश्यक समझता है , वह या तो धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि का या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़ों या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आपत्तियों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार को उसके विनिश्चय के लिए देगा । ( 3 ) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबद्ध समझा जाएगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होता , यदि। भूमि या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर लिए जाते हैं।

टिप्पण 3: -केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काउंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता-700001 को उक्त अधिनियम की धारा ( 3 ) के अधीन अधिसूचना सं. का. आ. 905 , तारीख 20 मार्च , 1987 जो भारत के राजपत्र के भाग ( 2 ) , खंड ( 3 ) उपखंड ( ii ) में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियुक्त किया है ।

अनुसूची " क"

बिनकरा भूमिगत परियोजना , विश्रामपुर क्षेत्र जिला- सरगुजा ( छत्तीसगढ़ )

सभीअधिकार:-

ग्राम का नाम

ग्राम सं.

जिला

तहसील

टिप्पणियां क्रम संख्या

पटवारी हल्का सं

क्षेत्र हेक्टर में

1.

9.258

135

भाग

अम्बिकापुर सरगुजा

गुमगरकला 49

कुल क्षेत्र: - 9.258 हेक्टेयर ( लगभग ) या 22.88 एकड़ ( लगभग )

ग्रामः गुमगरकला ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या: -

654( भाग ) , 665 ( भाग ) , 666( भाग ) , 736( भाग ) , 763 ( भाग ) , 764( भाग ) ,765 ( भाग ) , 768( भाग ) , 769 ( भाग ) से 773 , 774( भाग ) , 775 ( भाग ) , 797 ( भाग ) ,

1 सीमा वर्णन:-

क-ख रेखा ग्राम गुमगरकला में बिन्दु " क " से आरंम्भ होती है और प्लाट संख्या 768,765,764,763 और 666 से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " ख " पर मिलती है । 4463

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

ख-खा - ख2 -ख3 - ख 4-ख5- रेखा ग्राम गुमगरकला में प्लाट संख्या 666 बिन्दु खा , प्लाट संख्या 654 , बिन्दु ख2 , ख3 , और ख4 से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " ख5 " पर मिलती है ।

ख5 - ख6 -क रेखा ग्राम गुमगरकला के प्लाट संख्या 666 , 665 , 774 , 775 , 797, बिन्दु ख 6 और प्लाट संख्या 736 से गुजरती है फिर प्लाट संख्या 768 की पूर्वी सीमा से होती हुई आरंभिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है । :

अनुसूची "ख " बिनकरा भूमिगत परियोजना , विश्रामपुर क्षेत्र जिला-सरगुजा ( छत्तीसगढ़ )

खनन अधिकार:-

टिप्पण

तहसील

जिला

ग्राम का नाम पटवारी हल्का ग्राम सं.

क्षेत्र हेक्टर में

सं.

क्रम संख्या

1.

भाग

327.191

135

सरगुजा

अम्बिकापुर

गुमगरकला 49

2.

39

भाग काटकोना 49

30.544

अम्बिकापुर सरगुजा

कुल क्षेत्र:- 357.735 हेक्टेयर ( लगभग ) या 883.96 एकड़ ( लगभग )

भूमिअनुसूची:-

(1) ग्राम गुमगरकला ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या: -

45( भाग ) , 46 से 49 , 50 ( भाग ) , 51 से 391 , 392 ( भाग ) , 393 से 402, 403 ( भाग ) , 404 , 405 ( भाग ) , 414 ( भाग ) , 415 (भाग) , 416 ( भाग ) , 418 ( भाग ) , 419 ( भाग ) , 420 से 652, 653 ( भाग ) , 654 ( भाग ) , 666( भाग ) , 667 से 726 , 727 ( भाग) , 728 ( भाग ) , 736( भाग ) , 737 ( भाग ) , 740 ( भाग) , 741 से 746,747 (भाग ) , 748 से 755 , 756 ( भाग ) , 757 ( भाग ) , 758 (भाग) , 759 से 762 , 763 ( भाग ) , 764 ( भाग ) ,765 ( भाग ) , 766, 767 ( भाग) , 768 ( भाग ) , 276/790,273/789 , 192/791 (भाग ) , 531/792,151 /793 , 86/801 , 427/802 , 123/822 , 54/823 , 55/824 , 392/829 , 728/830, 648/833 , 648/834,648/835, 648/836,648/837, 648/838 , 667/839, 170/840 , 233/841 ( भाग ) , 244/842, 392/843 ,604/844 ,

ग्राम कटकोना ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या:- (2)

2( भाग ) , 11 , 12( भाग ) , 13 , 14 ( भाग ) , 15( भाग ) , 16 , 17( भाग ) , 18 , 19 , 20( भाग ) , 21 से 33 , 34( भाग ) , 35 ( भाग ) , 36( भाग ) , 37 ( भाग ) , 38 ( भाग ) , 81 ( भाग ) , 95( भाग ) , 96( भाग ) , 249( भाग ) , 250 ( भाग ) , 1243 ( भाग ) ,

सीमा वर्णन:-

क-ख रेखा ग्राम गुमगरकला में बिन्दु " क " से आरंम्भ होती है और उसी ग्राम के प्लाट संख्या 768 , 765 , 764, 763 और 666 से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " ख " पर मिलती है ।

ख- ग- घ-ड. रेखा ग्राम गुमगरकला के प्लाट संख्या 666 बिन्दु ग और घ , प्लाट संख्या 654 , 653 , 418,419,416,415,414,403 और 405 से गुजरती हुई , ग्राम गुमगरकला- गुमगरकला खुर्द की सम्मिलित सीमा पर स्थित बिन्दु " ड. " पर मिलती है ।

ड. -च-झ रेखा ग्राम गुमगरकला और गुमगरकला- खुर्द के सम्मिलित सीमा और बिन्दु " च " से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " झ " पर मिलती है । छ-ज-झ रेखा ग्राम गुमगरकला के प्लाट संख्या 392 से गुजरती हुई प्लाट संख्या 842 , 243 , 242 , 240 और 238 के उत्तरी सीमा से होती हुई प्लाट संख्या 841 , 791 , 45 , 50 , 791 बिन्दु " ज " के साथ गुजरती है बाद में चंदनई नदी की दक्षिणी सीमा से होती हुई ग्राम गुमगरकला और कटकोना की सम्मिलित सीमा पर स्थित बिन्दु " झ " पर मिलती है ।

झ-ञ रेखा ग्राम कटकोना के प्लाट संख्या 2 , 250 ,12 , 249 , 14 , 17 , 96 , 95 , 96 , 95 से गुजरती है और बिन्दु " ज " पर मिलती है । ञ-ट-क रेखा ग्राम कटकोना के प्लाट संख्या 95,20,81,34,35,36,37,38,1243 और 15 से गुजरती हुई ग्राम गुमगरकला में प्रवेश करती है औरप्लाट संख्या 727 , 728,736 , 737,740,747 से होती हुई प्लाट संख्या 748 की दक्षिणी सीमा से होती हुई बाद में प्लाट संख्या 756 , बिन्दु " ट " , प्लाट संख्या 757 , 758; 767 से होती हुई और आरंभिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है ।

[फा.सं. 43015 /3 /2006- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ] एम, शहाबुद्दीनं, अवर सचिव 4464

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi , the 3 I st July, 2008

S. O. 2191. Whereas , by the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal Number S. O. 4207 dated16th October, 2006 issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act, 1957 (20 of 1997) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in the Gazette of India , part II , section 3 , sub- section ( ii ) dated 28th October 2006 , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 817 hectares (approximately) or 2018.81 acres ( approximately ) of the lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification;

And, whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands prescribed in the Schedule (s ) appended to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 7of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957 ) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire:-

(a) The land measuring 9.258 hectares ( approximately) or 22.88 acres (approximately ) as All Rights in or over the said lands described in Schedule " A" appended hereto;

(b) The rights to mine , quarry , bore dig and search for win , work and carry away minerals in the lands measuring 357.735 hectares ( approximately) or 883.96 acres ( approximately) described in the Schedule " B " appended hereto .

Note 1 : The plan bearing No. SECL/BSP / GM/PIG/LAND/317 dated 07th April , 2008 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the office of the Collector , Surguja (Chhattisgarh ) or in the office ofthe Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street, Kolkata, 700001 or in the office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited ( Revenue Section ) , Seepat Road, Bilaspur , 495006 ( Chhattisgarh ) .

Note2 : Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of section 8 of the said Act which provides as follows :-

Objectionto Acquisition:

" 8 ( 1 ) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under section7 ( 1 ) has been issued , may, within thirty days of the issue of the notification , object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or any rights in or over such land .

Explanation,-

(1) It shall not be an objection wiithin the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operation in the land for the production of coal and that such operation should not be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person .

(2) Every objection under sub- section ( 1 ) shall be made to the competent authority in writing and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall , after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry, if any, as he thinks necessary , either makes a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 7 or of rights in or over such land , or inake different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land , to the Central Government , containing his recommendations on the objections, together with the record of the proceedings held by him, for the decision ofthat Government .

(3) For the purposes of this section , a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitledto claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act .

Note 3 : The Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata, 700001 , has been appointed by the Central Government as the competent authority under section 3 of the said Act, vide notification number S.O. 905 , dated the 20th March , 1987, published in part II , section 3 , sub - section ( ii ) of the Gazette of India , dated the 4th April , 1987.

SCHEDULE " A"

Binkara Underground Project , Bishrampur Area

Distt-Surguja (Chhattisgarh )

AllRights:

Tahsil

District

Remark

Sl.No.

Patwari halka Number

Village Number

Arca in Hectares

Name of Village

1

49

9.258

Part

Gumgarakale

135 Ambikapur

Surguja

Total - 9.258 Hectares (Approximately) or 22.88 Acres ( Approximately) .

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Gumgarakala ( Part):

654(P), 665 (P) , 666( P), 736 (P), 763(P), 764 (P), 765 (P), 768( P), 769 to 773 , 774 (P) , 775 ( P) , 797(P) .

Boundary Description:

A-B Line starts from point " A" in village Gumgarakala and passes through plot numbers 768 , 765 , 764, 763 , 666 and meets at point " B" .

4465 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

B-B1 -B2-B3 - B4- B5 Line passes in village Gumgarakala through plot number 666 , point B1 , plot number 654 , points B2, B3 , &B4 and meets at point "B5 " .

B5 - B6 - A Line passes in village Gumgarakala through plot numbers 666, 665, 774,775, 797 , point B6 plot number 736 then along eastern boundary of plot number 768 and meets at starting point " A " .

SCHEDULE " B "

Binkara Underground Project , Bishrampur Area

Distt- Surguja ( Chhattisgarh)

MiningRight:

Remarks

Tahsil

Sl.No.

Areain

District Hectares

Patwari halka Number

Village Number

Name of Village

1

Part

327.191

135

Gumgarakale

Ambikapur

Surguja

2

49 49

39

Part

30.544

Katkona

Surguja

Ambikapur

Total: -

357.735 Hectares (Approximately) or 883.96 Acres (Approximately).

1. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Gumgarakal a (Part) :

45(P), 46 to 50(P), 51 to 391 , 392(P) , 393 to 402, 403(P), 404, 405 (P), 414(P) , 415 (P), 416( P), 418 (P), 419( P), 420 to 652, 653(P) , 654(P) , 666(P) , 667 to 726, 727(P), 728 (P), 736(P), 737 (P) , 740(P), 741 to 746, 747(P), 748 to 755,756 (P), 757 (P), 758 (P), 759 to 762, 763 (P), 764 (P), 765 (P), 766,767 (P) , 768 (P) , 276/ 790,273/789, 192/791 (P) , 531/792 , 151/793, 86/801 , 427/802, 123/822 , 54/823,55/824,392/829, 728/830 , 648/830, 648/ 834,648/835,648/836,648/837,648/838 , 667/839 , 170/840, 233/841 (P), 244/842, 392/843,604/844.

2. Plotnumbers to be acquired in village Katkona (Part):

2(P), 11 , 12(P), 13 , 14(P), 15 (P) , 16, 17 (P) , 18 , 19, 20(P), 21 to 33 , 34( P), 35 (P), 36(P) , 37 (P) , 38 (P), 81 (P) , 95(P) , 96(P) , 249(P) , 250(P) , 1243(P) .

BoundaryDescription :

A-B Line starts from point " A" in village Gumgarakala and passes through plot numbers 768 , 765 , 764, 763 , 666 and meets at point " B " .

B- C-D- E Line passes in village Gumgarakala through plot numbers 666 , point C & D plot numbers 654 , 653,418, 419, 416,415, 414, 403 , 405 and meets at point " E" on the common boundary of village Gumgarakala -Gumgarakalakhurd .

E-F-G Line passes along the common boundary of village Gumgarakala - Gumgarakalakhurd and through point " F " and meets at point "G" .

G-H- I Line passes in village Gumgarakala through plot number 392 then along northern boundary of plot numbers 842 , 243, 242, 240, 238. After that through plot numbers 841 , 791 , 45, 50, 791 , point " H " then along partly southern bank ofChandanai river and meets at point " I " on the common boundary of village Gumgarakala - Katkona ..

I-J Line passes in village Katkona through plot numbers 2, 250, 12, 249 , 14, 17, 96, 95, 96, 95 and meets at point "J ".

J -K-A Line passes in village Katkona through plot numbers 95, 20, 81 , 34, 35 , 36, 37, 38 , 1243 , 15 , then enter in village Gumgarakala and passes through plot numbers 727, 728 , 736, 737, 740 , 747 then along southern boundary ofplot number 748 after that through plot number 756 , point " K " 757 , 758 , 767 and meets at starting point " A" .

[F.No. 43015/3 /2006 -PRIW- I ]

M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 31 जुलाई , 2008

का. आ. 2192.-केंद्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( i ) के अधीनं जारी भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 1045 , तारीख 19 मार्च , 2007 द्वारा , जो भारत के राजपत्र , भाग II , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) तारीख 09 अप्रैल , 2007 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची के विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में या उस पर के सभी अधिकारों के अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी । और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के अनुसरण में केंद्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

और , केंद्रीय सरकार का , पूर्वोक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और ओड़िशा सरकार से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि इससें संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 206.073 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 509.20 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि में या उस पर के सभी अधिकार अर्जित किए जाने चाहिएं ।

अतः अब केंद्रीय सरकार कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है , कि अनुसूची में वर्णित 206.073 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 509.20 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि अर्जित की जाती है ।

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. एमसीएल/एसवीपी/जीएम ( एल/ आर एंड आर) /पद्मा 9 ( 1 ) /2008 /01 तारीख 15 अप्रैल , 2008 का निरीक्षण कलक्टर , अंगुल ( ओडिशा ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता , 4466

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] पिन-700 001 के कार्यालय में या महाप्रबंधक ( एल/ आर एंड आर) , महानदी कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड , जागृति विहार/डाकघर- जागृति विहार, बुर्ला, सौबलपुर , ओड़िशा , पिन-768 020 ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

अनुसूची

पद्माब्लॉक

तालचेर कोलफील्ड्स ( तालचेर क्षेत्र ) जिला अंगुल ( ओड़िसा )

सभी अधिकार

योजना रेखांक सं एमसीएल/एसवीपी/जीएम( एल/आर एडं आर )/पद्मा-9 ( 1 ) /2008/01 तारीख 15 अप्रैल , 2008

क्र. सं. ग्राम का नाम

उपखंड

जिला

टिप्पणी पुलिस स्टेशन और पुलिस स्टेशन सं.

क्षेत्र एकड़ में (लगभग)

1.

तालचेर

52.28

तालचेर-30

भाग प‌द्मावतीपुर

अंगुल

2.

राकस

तालचेर

294.26

भाग

अंगुल

कोलियरी -81 .

3.

नकईपासी

57.01

कोलियरी -23

तालचेर

भाग

अंगुल

4.

तालचेर

कोलियरी-83

105.65

अंगुल

वृंदावनपुर

पूर्ण

योगः 206,073 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 509.20 एकड़ ( लगभग ) 1. पद्मावती ग्राम ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या :

1 से 113 , 114 ( भाग ) , 115 से 121 , 122 ( भाग ) , 123 , 124 , 125 ( भाग ) , 132 ( भाग ) , 139 ( भाग ) , 142 ( भाग ) , 47/1170 , 27/1208 , 3/12/14 , 25/1216 , 24/1217 , 26/1221 , 10/1222 , 10/1225 , 51/1230 , 86/1233 , 85/1234 , 10/1235 , 101/1236 ( भाग ) , 102/1251,57/ 1255 , 112/1262 , 15/1269 , 16/1270 , 17/1271 , 20/1272 , 122/1276, 141/1280 ( भाग ) , 33/1285 , 52/1286 , 60/1287 , 29/1289 , 121/1297 , 39/1334 , 1255/1390 , 18/1434 , 18/1444,18/ 1455 , 33/1463 , 39/1464 , 33/1468 , 33/1469 , 39/1470 , 33/1473 , 38/14744, 39/1475 , 59/1476 , 33/1477 , 33/1480 , 39/1481 , 48/1482 , 119/1483 , 38/1488 , 39/1489 ,

2. राकस ग्राम में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या :

1 से 580 , 581 ( भाग ) , 582 , 645 , 646 ( भाग ) , 647 ( भाग ) , 648( भाग ) , 649( भाग ) , से 722, 723 ( भाग ) , 729( भाग ) , 730( भाग ) , 731 से 798 , 799( भाग ) , 800 से 880 , 903 ( भाग ) ,904 से 906, 907 ( भाग ) , 920 से 925 , 950 से 952 , 960 ( भाग ) , 961 ( भाग ) ,962 ( भाग ) , 1096( भाग ) , 1097, 1098 , 1107 से 1112 , 1113 ( भाग ) , 1114 ( भाग ) , 1164 ( भाग ) , 10/1172 , 605/1173 , 651/1175 , 842/1177,649 / 1178 , 4/ 1180,26/ 1187 , 561/1189 , 648/1179( भाग ) , 179/1181 , 176/1182 , 216/ 1183,15 / 1184 , 99/1185 , 99/1186 , 572/1188 , 880/1193 , 875/1194 , 815/1195 , 851/1196 , 851/1197 , 851/1198 , 273/1199 , 235/1200 , 440/1201 से 440/1209 , 564/1210 , 515/1212 , 99/1213 , 387/1214 , 562/1215 , 240/1216 , 658/1218 , 715/1219 , 641/1220 , 721/1223 , 1108/1224 , 1208/1225 , 732/1226, से 732/1228 , 799/1229( भाग ) , 799/1230, 236/1237 से 236/ 1240,850/ 1241 , 856/1242 से 856/1246 , 850/1250 , 121/1251 से 121/1255 , 25/1256 से 25/1265 , 29/1266 से 29/1286 , 157/1287 से 157/1292 , 156/1293 से 156/1295 , 427/1296 , 367/1297, 367/1298 , 348/1299 , 348/1300 से 348/1303 , 270/1305 , 269/1306 , 260/1307 , 130/1308 , 244/1309 , 10/1311 , 10/1312 , 12/1313, 203/1314 , 11/1315 , 730/1317 , 664/1320 , 562/1321 , 231/1322 , 903/1323 , 6/1324 ,640/1329 , 547/1332 , 515/1333 , 3/1334, 232/1335 , 232/1336 , 648/1337 ( भाग ) , 580/1339 , 579/1340 , 120/1341 , 164/1343 , 163/1344 , 162/1345 , 234/1346 , 273/1347, 237/1348 , 176/ 1350,141 / 1351 , 266/1352 , 205/1357 , 863/1358 , 409/1359 , 468/1360 , 133/1363 से 133/1366 , 285/1267 से 285/1371 , 286/1372 से 286/1375 , 276/1376 से 276/1379 , 480/1392 , 772/1393 , 772/1394 , 39/1422 से 39/1426 , 24/1427 से 24/1442 , 99/1443 से 99/1447 , 179/1448 से 179/1452 , 3/1454 , 211/1455 , 211/1456 , 1175/1458 , 1175/1459 , 99/1463 , 177/1468 , 165/1469 , 517/1471 , 197/1472 , 183/1473 , 358/1474 , 850/1475 , 627/1479 , 197/1480 , 198/ 1481,808/ 1482 , 411/1487 से 411/1490, 3. नकईपासी ग्राम में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या :

194, 201 से 210 , 211 ( भाग ) , 212 से 230, 232, 233 , 234 ( भाग ) , 235 ( भाग ) , 264 से 291 , 295 से 352 , 294( भाग ) , 353 ( भाग ) , 357( भाग ) , 358 से 360 , 361 ( भाग ) , 297/1269 , 303/2870,303 /2871 , 315/2872 , 312/2873 , 305/2874 , 349/2875 , 339/2876 , 296/2877, 286/2888,266/2963 , 290/2966, 334/2972 , 335/2973 , 335/2974 , 231/3146 , 336/3181 , 332/3182 , 347/3183 , 270/3185 , 4. वृंदावनपुर ग्राम में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या :

1 से 96, 31/97 , 6/99 , 6/100 , 6/101 , 59/102 , 49/103 , 48/104 , 28/105 , 19 / 106,19/ 107 , 59/108 , 45/109 , 11/110 , 20/111 , 20/1124 , 18/113 , 18/114 , 96/115 , 94/ 116,11 / 117 , 11/118 , 11/119 , 12/120 , 25/121 , 31/122 , 94/123 , 96/124, से 96/126, 10/127 , 11/128,

सीमा विवरण:

क-खनंग: - रेखा बिन्दु " क " से आरंभ होती है जो ग्राम अल्लाहदनगर और राकस से होते हुए सीमा वृंदावनपुर और अल्लाहदनगर के पूर्व छोर से होते हुए बिन्दु " ग " पर पहुँचती है । 4467 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

ग - घ- ड़ - च- छ- ज : यह रेखा बांगरू नाला के उत्तरी सीमा से होकर गुजरती है ।

ज-झः- रेखा बिन्दु " ज " से आरंभ होकर प्लॉट सं. 0294 से गुजरती हुई प्लॉट सं. 291 के पश्चिमी सीमा से होकर प्लॉट सं. 194 के उत्तरी एवं पश्चिमी सीमा से चलकर प्लॉट सं. 205 के उत्तरी पश्चिमी सीमा के प्लॉट सं. 204 एवं प्लॉट सं. 203 , 202,201 से गुजरती हुई दक्षिणी सीमा के प्लॉट सं. 206 , 207 से होकर पश्चिमी सीमा से गुजरती हुई ग्राम नकईपासी के प्लॉट सं. 210 , 211 , 235 से होकर बिन्दु झ पर पहुँचती है । झ- ञ: - रेखा बिन्दु " झ " से होकर प्लॉट सं. 235 , 2111 से गुजरते हुए दक्षिणी सीमा के प्लॉट सं. 233 , 232 , 231/3146 , 264 , 265 , 266 , 2963 , 268 से होकर पूर्व सीमा के प्लॉट सं. 269 से गुजरती हुए दक्षिणी सीमा के प्लाट संख्या 352 से होकर प्लाट सं. 353 से गुजरती है । फिर रेखा दक्षिणी सीमा से होकर प्लाट से 340 , 339 से होकर ग्राम नकईपासी के प्लॉट सं. 357 , 361 से होकर बिन्दु " अ " पर पहुँचती है । झ-ट:- रेखा बिन्दु " झ " से होकर प्लॉट सं. 353 से होकर गुजरती हुई प्लॉट सं. 122 , 125 , 132 , 114 से गुजरती हुए दक्षिणी सीमा के प्लॉट सं. 112/1262 , 107 , 106 से होकर प्लॉट सं. 139 , 141/1280 , 142, 101/1236 से गुजरती हुए ग्राम प‌द्मावतीपुर और राकस से गुजरती हुए बिन्दु " ट" पर पहुँचती है ।

ट-क: - रेखा बिन्दु " ट " से होकर दक्षिणी सीमा के प्लॉट सं. 857 , 858 , 879 , 880 , 1193 से होकर प्लॉट सं. 903 से गुजरते हुए दक्षिणी सीमा के प्लॉट सं. 905 , 903/1323 से होकर प्लॉट सं. 907 से गुजरती है । फिर रेखा दक्षिणी सीमा से होकर प्लॉट सं. 920 , 925 से होकर प्लॉट सं. 799 से गुजरते हुए दक्षिणी सीमा के प्लॉट सं. 753 , 731 से होकर प्लॉट सं. 730, 729 , 723 , 1096 से गुजरती है । फिर रेखा दक्षिणी सीमा के प्लॉट सं. 1098 , 1107 , 1224 , 1112 से होकर प्लॉट सं. 1113 , 1114 , 1179 , 1337 , 1224 , 1112 , से होकर प्लॉट सं. 1113 , 1114 , 1179 , 1337 , 648 , 647 , 646, 581 , 1164 से गुजरती है और रेखा चलकर प्रारंभिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है ।

[फा.सं. 43015/4/2005- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]

एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 3 I st July, 2008

S.O. 2192. Whereas by the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal , number S.O. 1045 dated 19th March 2007, issued Under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of Coal Bearing Areas (Aequisition and Development) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in the Gazette of India, Part - II , Section 3 , sub- section ( ii ) dated the 9th April 2007 , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to acquire lands and all rights in or over lands in the locality specified in the Schedule appended to that notification ,

Andwhereas, the cornpetent authority in pursuance of Section 8 of the said Act , has made his report of the Cenrral Government;

Andwhereas, the Central Government after considering the report aforesaid and after consulting the Government of Orissa is satisfied that the land measuring 206.073 hectares ( approximately ) or 509.20 acres (approximately) and all rights in or over such land as described in the Schedule appended hereto should be acquired,

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 9 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) , the Central Government hereby declares that the land measuring 206.073 hectares ( approximately) or 509.20 acres ( approximately) described in Schedule are hereby acquired in all rights .

The Plan bearing number MCL/ SBP /GM ( L/R & R )/ PADMA - 9 ( 1 ) /2008/ 01 dated . 15th April , 2008 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the office of the Collector , Angul. (Orissa) or in the office of the Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street, Kolkota , or in the office of the General Manager (LR & R ), Mahanadi Coalfields Limited, Jagriti Vihar , P.O. Jagriti Vihar, Burla, District Sambalpur - 768 020 (Orissa) .

SCHEDULE

PADMA BLOCK TALCHER COALFIELD DISTRICT ANGUL (ORISSA)

ALL RIGHTS

(Planbearing No. MCLSBP /GM ( LR & R )/PADMA - 9( 1 ) /2008 /01 dated 15th April , 2008 )

Tahsil/

Remarks Police Station

District

'Area in Hectares

SL. Village

No.

andNo.

Sub Div .

(Approx.)

Talcher

Part

21.158

Talcher-30

Angul

1 Padmabatipur

Talcher

119.087

Part 2 Rakas

Colliery-81

Angul

Part

Talcher

23.072

Colliery-23

Angul

3 Nakeipasi

42.756

Talcher

Full Colliery-83

Angul

4 Brundabanpur

Total

206.073 hectares (approximately) or 509.20 acres (approximately) 2823 11708-16 4468

[PART 11-SEC . 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF IND : AUGUST 9, 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

PLOT NUMBERS TO BE ACQUIRED IN VILLAGE PADMABATIPUR (PART)

1 to 113, 114(P), 115 to 121 , 122 (P), 123 , 124, 125 (P), 132 (P), 139 (P) , 142(P) , 47/1170, 27/1208 , 3/1214 , 25/1216, 24/1217, 26/1221 , 10/1222 , 10/1225 , 51/1230, 86/1233 , 85/1234 , 10/1235, 101/1236( P ) , 102/1251 , 57/1255 , 112/1262, 15/1269, 16/1270 , 17/1271 , 20/1272 , 122/1276 , 141/1280 ( P) , 33/1285 , 52/1286, 60/1287, 29/1289 , 121/1297 , 39/1334, 1255/1390, 18/1434, 18/1444 , 18/1455, 33/1463 , 39/1464, 33/1468 , 33/1469, 39/1470, 33/1473 , 38/1474 , 39/1475 , 59/1476, 33/1477, 33/1480,39/ 1481,48/ 1482, 119/1483 , 38/1488 , 39/1489 .

PLOT NUMBERS TO BE ACQUIRED IN VILLAGE RAKAS

1 to 580 , 581 (P), 582 to 645 , 646 ( P) , 647( P) , 648( P) , 649 to 722 , 723 (P), 729 (P) , 730( P) , 731 to 798 , 799 ( P), 800 to 880 , 903 (P ), 904 to 906, 907 (P.), 920 to 925, 950 to 952, 960 (P), 961 (P), 962 (P) , 1096 (P), 1097 , 1098 , 1107 to 1112, 1113 (P), 1114(P), 1164 (P) , 10/1172 , 605/1173 , 651/ 1175,842/ 1177,649/ 1178,4/ 1180,26/ 1187, 561/1189 , 648/1179 (P), 179/1181 , 176/ 1182 , 216/1183 , 15/1184, 99/1185 , 99/1186 , 572/1188, 880/1193 , 875/1194 , 815/1195 , 851/1196, 851/1197 , 851/1198 , 273 / 1199, 235/1200, 440/1201 to 440/1209, 564/1210 , 515/1212, 99/1213 , 387/1214, 562/1215 , 240/1216, 658/1218 , 715/1219 , 641 / 1220 , 721/1223 , 1108/1224, 1108/1225, 732/1226 to 732/1228 , 799/1229 (P) , 799/1230 , 236/1237 to 236/1240 , 850/ 1241,856/ 1242 to 856/1246, 850/1250 , 121/1251 to 121/1255 , 25/1256 to 25 / 1265,29/ 1266 to 29/1286 , 157/1287 to 157/1292, 156/1293 to 156/1295, 427/1296, 367/1297, 367/1298 , 348/1299 , 348/1300 to 348/1303 , 270/1305 , 269/1306 , 260/1307 , 130/1308 , 244/ 1309 , 10/13 11 , 10/1312 , 12/1313 , 203/1314 , 11/1315, 730/1317 , 664/1320 , 562/1321 , 231/1322 , 903/1323 , 6/1324, 640/1329, 547/1332, 515/1333 , 3/1334, 232/1335 , 232/1336, 648/1337 (P) , 580/1339 , 579/1340, 120/1341 , 164/1343 , 163/1344, 162/1345 , 234/1346, 273/1347, 237/1348 , 176/1350 , 141 / 1351,266/ 1352 , 205/1357, 863/ 1358,409 / 1359,468/ 1360 , 133/1363 to 133/1366, 285/1267 to 285/1371 , 286/1372 to 286/1375 , 276/1376 to 276/1379 , 480/1392 , 772/1393 , 772/1394 , 39/1422 to 39/1426, 24/ 1427 to 24/1442, 99/1443 to 99/1447, 179/1448 to 179/1452 , 3/1454 , 211 / 1455,211 / 1456 , 1175/1458 , 1175/1459, 99/1463 , 177/ 1468 , 165/1469 , 517/1471 , 197/1472, 183/1473 , 358/1474 , 850/1475 , 627/1479 , 197/1480 , 198/1481 , 808/1482 , 411/1487 to 411/1490.

PLOT NUMBERS TO BE ACQUIRED IN VILLAGE NAKEIPASI

194 , 201 to 210, 211 (P) , 212 to 230 , 232, 233 , 234(P) , 235 (P) , 264 to 291 , 295 to 352, 294 (P) , 353 (P) , 357 (P) , 358 to 360 , 361 ( P ) , 297/1269 , 303/2870, 303/2871 , 315/2872 , 312/2873 , 305/2874, 349/2875, 339/2876, 296/2877, 286/2888 , 266/ 2963 , 290/2966, 334/2972 , 335/2973, 335/2974 , 231/3146 , 336/3181 , 332/3182, 347/3183,270/3185.

PLOT NUMBERS TO BE ACQUIRED IN VILLAGE BRUNDABANPUR

1 to 96 , 31/97 , 6/98, 6/99 , 6/100, 6/101 , 59/102, 49/103 , 48/104, 28/105, 19/106 , 19/107 , 59/108, 45/109 , 11/110 , 20/ 111, 20/112 18/113 , 18/114, 96/ 115,94/ 116, 11/117, 11/118 ; 11/119 , 12/120 , 25/121, 31/122, 94/123 , 96/124 to 96/126, 10/127, 11/128,

BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION

A-B-C: Line starts from point ' A ' and passes partly along the common boundary of villages Ahlladnagar and Rakas and partly along the common boundary of Brundabanpur and Ahlladnagar in the Eastern side and meetsat point 'C' .

C-D-E- F-G - H -1 : This line passes along Bangaru Nalla in the Northern side .

1 -J:! ! Line passes through plot No. 294 , along the Western boundary of plot No. 291 , Northern & Western boundary of plot No. 194 , along Northen boundary of Plot No. 205 , Northern & Western boundary of plot No. 204, along Western boundary of Plot Nos. 203, 202,201 , along Southern boundary of plot Nos . 206 , 207 , along Western boundary of plot Nos . 210 , 211 , 235 of village Nakeipassi and meets at points ' J ' .

J-K: The line starts from point ' J ' and passes through plot Nos . 235 , 211 , along Southern boundary of plot Nos . 233 , 232, 231/3146, 264 , 265, 266, 2963 , 268 , along Eastern boundary ofplot Nos 269 , along Southern boundary of plot No. 351 , along Western & Southern boundary of plot No. 352 , through plot No. 353 , along Southern boundary of plot Nos. 340, 339 , through plot Nos 357 , 361 ofvillage Nakeipasi and meets at point 'K' .

K-L: The line passes through the plot Nos . 122 , 125 , 132, 114 along Southern boundaries of plot Nos. 112/1262, 107, 106, through plot Nos . 139 , 141/1280 , 142, 101/1236 and meets at point ' L' on common boundary of village Padmabatipur and Rakas .

L-A: The line passes along Southern boundaries of plot Nos . 857 , 858 , 879, 880/1193 , through plot No. 903 , along Southern boundaries of plot Nos . 905 , 903/1323 , through plot No. 907 , along Southern boundaries of plot Nos . 920 , 925, through plot No. 799, along Southern boundary ofplot No. 53 , 731 , through plot No. 730, 729 , 723 , 1096 , along Southern boundary of plot Nos . 1098 , 1107, 1224, 1112, through plot Nos. 1113 , 1114, 1179, 1337,648,647,646,581 , 1164, and lastly meets at point 'A' .

[F. No. 43015/4/2005 - PRIW - I ] M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy .

4469 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

Industrial Disputes Act is justified ? If not what relief he is entitled?"

श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 26 जून , 2008

का. आ. 21.93.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947- का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार , औद्योगिक अधिकरण , कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 49/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-06-2008 प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[फा.सं. एल-12012/75/2000- आईआर( बी- I ) ]

2. The case in short as set up by the union raising thepresent industrial dispute on behalf of the workman is that earlier to the present the union had raised an industrial dispute which was referred to this tribunal for adjudication by MOL New Delhi to adjudicate the point as to whether the action ofthe management of State Bank of India , Kanpur , in refusing full wages to Sri Vijay Kumar Sweeper cum Farrash isjust and legal? If not to what relief the workman isentitled to?

एन. एस . बोरा , आर्थिक अधिकारी

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi , the 26th June , 2008

S.O. 2193. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 49/ 2004) of Central Government, Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Kanpur , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India, and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 26-06-2008 .

[F.No. L- 12012/75/2000- IR(B- I) ]

N. S. BORA, Economic Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI R. G. SHUKLA , PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT, KANPUR

Industrial Dispute No.49 of2004

The President

State Bank of India Karamchari Sangh

K-46 Devender Puri Kidwai Nagar Kanpur.

And

The Regional Manager State Bank of India Region III Mall Road Kanpur i

AWARD

1. Central Government , MOL, New Delhi , vide notification No. L- 12012/75 /2000 -IR.B - 1 dated 7-10-2004 , has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal :-

3.TheTribunal recorded its finding in favour of the workman vide its award dated 15-4-97, which was published in the Gazette of India on 17-5-97 and which has become the service conditions between the workman and the management of State Bank of India after expiry 'of thirty days of the date of publication of the award. The opposite party had not challenged the award before any superior court. It is further pleaded that all of sudden the branch manager , Naveen Market branch , Kanpur of the opposite party bank vide letter No. 24 dated 10/ 11--3-96 issued direction to the workman without any legal authority or power to the effect that the workman is directed that with effect from 16-3-98 he shall perform the duty only 18 hours in a week and his appoint shall continue on ½ of the scale wages . It is the further case of the union that full time wages have been awarded by the Tribunal and after the ◆ublication ofthe award the same has become final between the parties after expiry of thirty days in view of the provisions of Section 17 and 17 -A ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It has also been pleaded that neither the branch manager nor does the management of State Bank of India have any right or authority to amend the award of the Tribunal which has become final or attained finality between the parties . On the basis of above it has also been pleaded that the workman has legal and fundamental right of receiving his full wages as awarded to him by the tribunal and no material change can be brought therein unless provisions of Section 9 -A of the Act is complied with by the managementgement of State Bank of India . Thus, the management is guilty of unfair labour practice as defined under section 2- ra of the Act. Lastly it has also been pleaded by the Union that neither the union nor the workman is inclined to give its consent in the present dispute to the opposite party to be represented by the legal practitioner or any other outsider who is not in the employment of the State Bank of India . On the basis of above it has been prayed that the reference be answered in favour of the union and against the management bank granting the workman full time wage scale for which the workman is legally entitled to receive the same.

"Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India, Kanpur in changing the working hours of Sri Vijay Kumar Part Time Sweeper without following the provisions of Section 9-A of the

4. On the contrary the opposite party State Bank of India refuted the claim of the workman union on variety of grounds interalia alleging that the workman is working as parttime sweeper w.e.f. 16-10-81 on ½ scale wage at branch 4470

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 /SRAVANA 18 , 1930

office Naveen Market Kanpur . It is alleged that in view of the award as the bank took the work from the workman 29 hours in a week the workman was paid his full wages by the opposite party w.e.f. 16-3-95 according to the service rules applicable prior to the award , opposite party started taking work from the workman for 18 hours a week on ½ scale . It is also alleged that according to the service condition applicable on the part time sweeper if the Sweeping area falls within 2001 to 3500 sq. ft . and working hours arebetween 13 to 19 hours in a week, such part time employees are entitled to ½ of scale wage. Management further pleaded that the carpet area of its Naveen Market Branch is 2158 sq . fit and workman has been correctly paid his½ of scale wage which is absolutely appropriate having regard to working hours of the workman and sweeping area ofthe branch . Workman is being utilized as part time sweeper for 18 hours on w.e.f. 16-3-98 . The present claim of the workman do not fa'l within the ambit and scope of provisions of Section 9 -A of Industrial Disputes Act and the claim of the union workman is liable to be rejected at the hands of this tribunal .

5. The union workman filed rejoinder statement in the case but nothing new has been pleaded except reiteration of the facts already pleaded by them in their claim statement .

! 6. After exchange a pleadings between the parties whereas opposite party vide list dated 25-4-05 has filed photocopies of 8 documents , the representative for the union vide list dated 13-7-05 has also filed 12 photocopies ofthe documents . The management again vide their list of documents dated 13-7-05 has also filed certain documents in the shape of carbon , copy . Both contesting parties have also adduced oral evidence by examining Sri Har Swarup as M. W. 1 and Sri Vijay Kumar workman concern asW.W.I in support of their claim and counter claim .

7. Tribunal heard arguments of the contesting parties at length and have also perused the evidence and other relative documents available on the record of the case carefully and have also given anxious consideration to the arguments advanced by the contesting parties in support ofclaim and counter claim .

8. Tribunal after going through the reference order is ofthe opinion that a very short question is involved in the case as to whether or not the management of State Bank of India has brought any material change in the service conditions applicable to the workman in view of the award and whether or not before effecting such change in the service conditions applicable to the workman provisions ofSection 9 -A of the Act has been complied with .

9. Itis not atall in dispute that the workman was paid his full wages in terms of award of this tribunal , but it has been forcefully argued by the representative for the management that the carpet area of the branch where the workman is posted is 2158 sqft, therefore , having regard to

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] the carpet area of the branch it was within the competence of the management to reduce the working hours of the workman and if it has been done in his case the same is within the terms of Bipartite Settlement . As such it cannot be said that the management have brought any material change in the service conditions applicable on the workman.

10. On the contrary it has been argued by the authorized representative for the workman that if the award ofthis tribunal has been complied with by the bank without there being any challenge against it , the same has become the service conditions of the workman which could not have been changed without complying with the provisions ofSection 9 -A of the Act and since the opposite party bank has reduced the working hours of the workman without any notice or reason that would amount violation of the above provisions .

11. Before appreciating the controversy in hand , it will be useful to go through the provisions of Section 9 -A oftheAct which goes as under-

Sec . 9 -A - Notice ofChange

No employer, who proposes to effect any change in the conditions of service applicable to any workman in respect of any matter specified in the Fourth Schedule shall affect such change : --

(a) Without giving to the workman likely to be affected by such change notice in the prescribed manner ofthe nature of change proposed to be effected , or (b) Within twenty one days of giving such notice ;

Provided that no notice shall be required for effecting any such change ,

(a) Where the change is effected in pursuance of any (Settlement or Award ) or

12. After going through the above provisions of the Act, the tribunal is of the opinion that the arguments advanced by the authorized representative for the workman has force . The tribunal is unable to accept the arguments ofthemanagement for simple reasons that when the earlier award ofthe tribunal has been complied with by the opposite party bank and the same has not been assailed before any superior court , the contention of the opposite party cannot beaccepted that they were competent to reduce the working hours of the workman taking into consideration the carpet area of the branch. If in the opinion of the opposite party the carpet area of the branch does not attract scavenging work for more than 18 hours a week it was open for them to have transferred the workman from that branch to some other branch where the work from the workman could have been taken for more than 18 hours entitling him for full pay and allowances as sweeper- cum-farrash , but it was not at all open to them to have reduced his working hours without [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

any notice or reasons. The tribunal is further of the opinion that the earlier award of the tribunal has become the service conditions between the workman and the management of StateBank of India, and for all intent and practical purposes , it was obligatory on the management to have given notice to the workman before effecting any material change in service conditions as is provided under Section 9 -A of the Act. The provisions of Bipartite Settlement dated 21.10.66 shall remain silent in the case of the workman and the management cannot be given any benefit thereof in view ofthe earlier award of the tribunal whereunder the workman wasgiven full pay and allowances as sweeper- cum- farrash by the opposite party bank.

13. In view of reasons as disclosed above , the tribunal cannot sustain the action of the opposite party as referred to in the schedule of reference order and it is held thatthe workman is entitled to be posted as full time sweeper cum- farrash in some branch where the services of the workman could be utilized more than 29 hours in a week . It further held that the action of the management is in breach ofthe provisions of Section 9 -A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , and also attracts the provisions of Section 2(ra) of the Act .

14. In the end it is held that the action ofthe management ofState Bank of India Kanpur in changing the working hours ofSri Vijay Kumar, Part time Sweeper without following the provisions of Section 9 - A ofthe Act is neither legal , fair nor justified. As a result of it the decision of the opposite party. bank vide their letter dated 10/11-03-98 is set aside and it is further held that the workman is entitled for his full pay and allowances as Sweeper with effect from 16-03-98 and all other consequential benefits attached with the post . Liberty is open for the bank to place and post the workman in such a branch where sweeping work for more than 29 hours is available.

15. Reference is, therefore , answered in favour of the union/workman and against the opposite party State Bank of India , Kanpur .

: R.G SHUKLA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 10 जुलाई , 2008

का. आ. 2194.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैं. कोच्चि रिफाइनरिस लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , एरनाकुलम के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 171/2006/329 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [फा. सं. एल-30012/19/1997 - आईआर( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

4471

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

New Delhi , the 10th July, 2008 S.O. 2194.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 171 / 2006/329) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Ernakulam , now as shown in the annexure in Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M / s . Kochi Refineries Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 10-7-2008 .

[F. No. L- 30012/19/ 1997 - IR( C - 1 ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT , ERNAKULAM

Present : Shri . P.L. Norbert , B.A. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer (Wednesday, the 14th day of May, 2008 /24th Vaisakha 1930)

I. D. 171/2006

(I.D.20/1998 of Labour Court, Ernakulam) Union

: 1. The General Secretary, Kochi Refineries Workers Association , Ambalamughal , Ernakulam District .

: 2. The General Secretary, Kochi Refineries Employees Association , Ambalamughal , Ernakulam District.

By Adv. Sri . C. S. Ajith Prakash .

Management : The General Manager ( HRM) , Kochi Refineries Ltd. , Ambalamughal, Ernakulam District . By Adv. M/s . Menon & Pai .

This case coming up for hearing on 14.05.2008 , this Tribunal cum - Labour Court on the same day passed the following

AWARD

This is a reference made under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d ) of Industrial Disputes Act. The reference is :

"Whether the action of the management of Cochin Refineries Ltd. , in deducting wages in respect of 44 workmen in Stock & Oil Movement Department during the period September 1995 to March 1996 in connection with certain alleged charges is justified? Ifnot, to what relief the workman are entitled ? " 2. The dispute was originally referred to State Labour Court, Ernakulam and was transferred to this court in June 4472

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO.2) AT DHANBAD

Present

Shri Nagendra Kumar , Presiding Officer

Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10( 1 ) (D) ofthe I. D. Act . , 1947

Reference No. 69 of 2006

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of TISCO . Ltd. and their workman

Appearances:

: None On behalf of the workman

Onbehalf of the employers : Mr. D. K. Verma ,

Advocate .

State

: Jharkhand

2006 as per the order , of Hon'ble High Court of Kerala. After the case was received by this court notice was issued to both sides . They entered appearance and filed claim statement and written statement . However both sides have been taking time on one ground or other for adducing evidence . For the last several postings the unions were seeking adjournment . The case stands posted finally for evidence today . But none of the parties and concerned counsel are present . However representation was made by the union for adjournment . Reference was made in 1998. There is no point in keeping the case pending indefinitely and it benefits none . Hence the request for further adjournment is rejected . The burden is on the union to prove that the action of the management in deducting wages of workers for the periods 1995-96 is illegal. But no evidence is adduced to prove the allegation and the claim, Therefore I hold that the action of the management in deducting wages of 44 workmen in the Stock & Oil Movement Department during the period September 1995 to March 1996 is legal and justified and the workmen are not entitled for any relief.

: Coal.

Industry

The award will come into force one month after its publication in the official gazette .

Dated , Dhanbad , the 18th June , 2008

AWARD

Dictated to the Personal Assistant , transcribed and typed by her, corrected and passed by me on this the 14th day ofMay , 2008.

P. L. NORBERT, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 10 जुलाई , 2008

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1)( d) of the I. D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/52/2006 ( IR ( CM - 1 ) , dated , the 10th November , 2006.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the demand of the Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union from the management of TISCO for providing employment to the dependent son of Smt . Najiban Bibi , workman is justified ? If so, to what relief is the said workman entitled ? "

को. आ. 2195.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैं. टी. आई. एस. सी. ओ . लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या 2 धनबाद के पंचाट ( संसदर्भ सं. 69/2006/100 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार की 10-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[फा.सं. एल-20012/ 52/2006- आईआर( सीएम-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 10th July, 2008

S.O. 2195. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 69/ 2006/100 ) of Central Govemment Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court No. 2 , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure, in Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to management of M /s . TISCO Ltd. , and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 10-7-2008 .

[ F.No. L- 20012/ 52/ 2006 - IR( C - I )]

2. In this case neither the concerned workman nor his representative appeared before this Tribunal . Management side , however, made appearance through their authorised representative . It transpires from the record that Regd. Notice and show cause notice were issued to the workman side consecutively . The concerned workman/ sponsoring union not only failed to comply with Rule 10 (B) of I.D. ( Central ) Rules , 1957 but also did not consider necessary to respond to the notices issued by this Tribunal . Gesture oftheworkman/ sponsoring union if is looked into itwill expose clearly that they are not interested to proceed with this case . Under such circumstances , this Tribunal find no ground to adjourn the case suo moto for days to gether . Hence , a ' No dispute' Award is passed in this reference presuming non- existence of any industrial dispute between the parties.

SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

NAGENDRA KUMAR , Presiding Officer [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 10 जुलाई, 2008

का. आ. 2196.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केंन्द्रीय सरकार मै. सहारा इंडिया एअरलाइंस लि. प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या 2 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 22/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-07-2008 प्राप्त हुआ था ।

| [ फा. सं. एल -11012/79/1999- आई. आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

4473

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

The workman applicant has filed claim statement . In the claim statement it has been stated that the workman joined the aforesaid management as Cleaner on 2-12-1993 in Engineering Section and was confirmed on 1-12-1994 after satisfactory service . His wages was Rs . 3500 per month.

That in the first week of February, 1998 the workman wasill as he was suffering from Jaundice and was on medical leave from 6-2-1998 . He had duly intimated the management about his sickness .

स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 10th July, 2008 S.O. 2196.--In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 22/ 2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court No. 2 , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s Sahara Indian Airlines Ltd. , and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 10-07-2008.

That the workman joined the duty after he was fully recovered on 15-3-1998 , but the management all of sudden on 15-5-1998 terminated his services illegally and unjustifiably without holding any inquiry by a written office order. He was not paid any retrenchment compensation rather his wages for two months were withheld by the management .

That the workman approached the management a number of times but he was not taken back on duty . Even his earned wages for two months were paid to him after he obtained clearance from all the department under duress .

That the said termination of workman's services on 15-5-1998 by management without holding inquiry and without payment of retrenchment compensation is not only illegal , unjustified but also arbitrary and against the principle of natural justice .

[F.No. L- 11012/79 / 1999- IR(C- 1 ) ]

SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- II, NEW DELHI That the workman looked for fresh employment after said illegal termination but could not sücceed and as such he isunemployed and pulling his days in extreme hardship as he has small children and aged parents dependent on him.

1.D.NO.22/2000

PRESIDING OFFICER : R.N. RAI

IN THE MATTER OF :

Sh . Birender Kumar, C/ o . General Mazdoor Trade Union , Chamber No.445 , NewComplex, Patiala House Courts , New Delhi - 110001

The management has filed written statement. It has been stated in the written statement that the applicant did not inform the management about his illness . He also did not place on record with the management either medical certificate or fitness certificate .

That the applicant joined duty on 15-3-1998 is admitted as it is a statement of facts . The applicant was informed time of his unauthorized absence and various show cause notices were issued to him but he never responded to any of these notices .

Claimant

VERSUS

TheChief Controller,

M/ s . Sahara India Airlines Limited , 7- 8th Floor , Akash Deep Building, 14, K.G. Marg,

New Delhi - 110001

.Respondents

AWARD

TheMinistry ofLabour by its letter No.L - 11012/79/ 99 IR(C- I ) Central Governrnnet dt . 4-2-2000 has referredthe following point for adjudication:

The point runs as hereunder :

"Whether the termination of services of Sh . Virender Kumar , workman for un - authorized absence by M/ s Sahara Airlines Limited is justified in the circumstances of the case ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled . "

Thatclearance was obtained by the applicant from various departments with his own will without any fear. He in person obtained clearance from various departments and submitted the same to the Personnel Department for settlement of dues . It was not obtained under duress . Nowhere the applicant has made any written protest in this connection . As it was done all with his free will he never approached the management for reinstatement of services.

That the applicant may be dismissed infact and circumstances as explained above. The conduct of Sh . Virender Kumar was highly objectionable and was hence his services were terminated after giving him ample opportunities to explain reasons for his un- authorized absence .

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder . In the rejoinder he has refterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement . The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement .

4474

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] Evidence ofboth the parties has been taken .

Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.

The management has not filed any other proof of sending these notices by registered post . Even no photocopy of the receipt has been annexed on the record, so it becomes quite obvious that prior to termination of the services of the workman no show cause notice was served onhim.

The case of the workman is that he joined the Engineering Section of the managemtn on 2-12-1993 and wasconfirmed on 1-12-1994 after satisfactory service.

Themanagement witness has further stated as under:

"The workman himself abandoned his hob on the receipt of the settlement amount of Rs . 10,000 as the workman was not interested in doing the job properly and it appears that he had taken the job somewhereelse ." Itwas submitted that the workman was ill from 6-2-1998 and he suffered fromjaurdice and was on medical leave from 6-2-1998 . He intimated the management about hisillness . Hejoined on 15-3-1998 but the management all ofsudden terminated his services illegally and unjustifiably without holding any inquiry by written office orders .

The management witness has taken the case of abandonment of job in the affidavit only . In written statement there is no case of abandonment .

The workman approached the management many times but he was paid two months wages after he got clearance from its departments .

That the termination of his services w.e.f. 15-5-1998 without holding any inquiry is arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice.

Itwas submitted from the side of the management that theworkman absented un - authorisedly . Several notices were sent to him . He joined duty on 15-3-1998 but in view of un authorized absence his services were terminated . He received all his dues from the department without any protest.

Itfurther becomes quite obvious from perusal ofthe record that the workman on 2-5-1998 moved an application for 37 days payment from 6-2-1995 to 14-3-1995 . There is endorsement on this application that the workman was absentfrom 6-2-1998 to 14-3-1998 and he resumed duty from 15-3-1998 . This endorsement is of 30-4-1998 . the workman infact was absent from 2-3-1998 to 14-3-1998 but he has sent application along with medical certificate . Photocopy medical certificate and fitness certificate has been annexed with the records . He was advised rest from 6-2-1998 to 14-3-1998 . The management has received the application of the workman along with medical certificate. The medical certificates have not been denied by the management.

From perusal ofthe record it becomes quite obvious that the workman has filed with the record acknowledgement cards which prove that the workman has sent applications along with medical certificate to the management and he received back the acknowledgement onthe address 25 - A, Civil Lines , Tis Hazari Courts.

The workman was in employment from 15-3-1998 to 15-5-1998. No notice was given to him. It appears that the management with malafide intention issued three notices on incorrect address . The workman was . absent from 6-2-1998 to 14-3-1998 . He was on duty from 15-3-1998 to 15-5-1998 so there is no question of sending notice dated 6-4-1998 .

The management filed photocopy of notices sent to the workman dated 16-2-1998 , MW1/ 5 dated 2-3-1998, MW1/6 dated 6-4-1998 , MW1 / 7. The address mentioned inall the notices is WZ- Tilak Nagar , Harijan Colony , Delhi . The notices have not been sent on correct address . Notice dated 6-4-1998 is a forged document. The workman admittedly joined on 15-3-1998 and his services were terminatedon 15-5-1998 so there is no question of sending notices by registered post on 6-4-1998 . The workman was in employment and he could have been handedover the notice dated 6-4-1998 in person.

The management illegally removed the workman vide order dated 15-5-1998 without serving any notice regarding his unauthorized absence . The workman was in employment from 15-3-1998 to 15-5-1998 so the management should have served notice on him by hand as he was in the employment ofthe management . All the notices are forged and fabricated . These notices have not been sent on the correct address of the workınan .

It appears that these three notices have been prepared after services of the workman have been terminated and these notices have been sent on wrong address . The management witness has admitted as under:

" I do not have any other proof of service of show cause notice placed on record I cannot say if the address givenon Ex.MW1/ 5 is not correct address of the workman itishowever, correct that the address of the workman on the said documents are different. Vol . that the H.No. 440 missing in show cause notice . The correct proof of H.No. musthave been mentioned on the envelope . The envelope returned and it was returned to the sender on account of wrong address . "

From perusal of the above statement of the management witness it becomes quite obvious that the notices MW1 /5 , MW1 /2 & MW1 /3 were sent on wrong address . These notices have been received back .

The management has not taken any definite case in written statement . These notices have not been specifically mentioned in the written statement . The management has takenthe case of termination of service of the workman on account of unauthorized absence in written statement and abandonment of job in the affidavit of the management . The management has not proved that really notices were sent to the workman for unauthorized absence . The management has also failed to prove that the workman has abandoned the job , as it becomes quite obvious from the letterdated 2-5-1998 that the workman demanded his salary. He has been paid only the salary. He has not moved any application for his dues . The management after illegally terminating the services of the workman has cleared his 4475 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008 / श्रावण 18, 1930

Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10( 1 ) (d) ofthe I. D. Act, 1947. i

Reference No. 290 of 1987

Parties:

Employers in relation to the

management of Meghahațuburu

IronOre Project and their workman.

dueshimself. The workman had not made any application for clearance of the dues. Abandonment is not proved in view of V (2004) SLT 435 as the workman has not been confronted with the documents . He has signed the documents of salary sheet while receiving. It cannot be implied that by receiving salary on the salary sheet , the workman has abandoned his services . The management hastaken bogus case after illegal termination of the service oftheworkman.

APPEARANCES :

Mr.B. Mukherjee,

Onbehalfofthe employers :

Dy. Manager , Law.

Onbehalfofthe workman : Mr. Manoranjan Sahu , The workman has filed affidavit that he is out of empioyment all along . This version of his affidavit has not been rebuted by the management , so he is entitled to reinstatement with 100% back wages .

Authorised Representative.

The reference is replied thus:

State : Jharkhand Industry : Iron Ore.

Dated, Dhanbad, the 18th June , 2008

AWARD

The termination of services of Sh , Virender Kumar , workman forun - authorized absence byM/s . Sahara Airlines Limited is not justified in the circumstances of the case . The management should reinstate the workman applicant w.e.f. 15-5-1993 along with 100% back wages and all the consequential benefits within two months from the date of the publication of the award.

The award is given accordingly.

TheGovt . of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 )( d ) of the I.D. Act. , 1947 has referred the following dispute tothis Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 26011 / 18 / 87-D.III (B ) dated, the 6th November, 1987 .

Date: 23-06-2008

SCHEDULE

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 11 जुलाई , 2008

"Whether the management of Meghahatuburu Iron OreProject of M / s . BSL under Sail is justified is not regularising the daily rated workmen viz . Khalasi & Electrician ? If not , to what relief the workmen concerned areentitled?"

का.आ. 2197. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मेघाहातुबुरू आयरन ओर प्रोजेक्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 2, धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 290/1987/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआं था।

[सं. एल-29012/ 17/2005 - आईआर( एम. ) ]

कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 11th July, 2008

S.O. 2197. In pursuance of Section 17 of.the .

Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No: 290/ 1987/98 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. 2, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Meghahatuburu Iron Ore Project and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 11-7-2008 .

[No. L-29012/17/2005 - IR(M . ) ]

KAMAL BAKHRU, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO . 2) AT DHANBAD

PRESENT

2. The case of the concerned workmen in short is that Meghahatuburu Iron Ore Project mine at & Ρ.Ο. Meghahatuburu Dist. Singhbhum started to function since 1974 under the then employerNational Mineral Development Corporation Ltd, a Govt . of India undertaking . It is a highly mechanised mine. Sophisticated equipments for different purposes have been installed and there is also business of carrying iron ore after processing and the ores are sent to the Bokaro Steel Plant or to Durgapur Steel Plant , Since it is abig Iron Ore Mines for commencement of the said project different personnels were deployed in different streams . Different type of workers have been placed on regular, permanent work on standard scales of pay and several other benefits fixed by tripartite settlements between the employers and their workman . Prior to the year 1977daily ratedworkmen of different designations were employed in the adjacent Kiriburu Iron Ore Project Mine of the same employer Company is N.M.D.C. but after 22 days of total and peaceful general strike by the workmen in the whole of KIOM all the daily rated workman were regularised as permanent workmen on standard scales ofpay as monthly rated workmen getting all the benefits of tripartite wage settlements and other statutory benefits as per settlement dated 7-8-77 arrived at between the employer N.M.D.C and their workmen represented by this Union and other Unions under the provisions of Section 12(3 ) of the 1.D. Act, 1947 . On 1-5-78 by virtue of the Public Sector Iron & Steel Companies (Restructing ) and Misc. Provisions Act , 1978 both the Kiriburu Iron Ore Project Mine and SHRI NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer

2823 GI/08-17 4476

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( il) ]

due to the acts of the management an industrial dispute was raised which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal . Prayer has been made that the concerned workman may be considered and adjudicated awarding full benefits to the concerned workman with back wages etc.

The list of workmen were not sent along with the reference. However , it appears that a list of 195 workmen was received in this Tribunal vide Ministry's letter No. FN L-29012/ 17 /205 - IR ( M) dtd . 29-12-2005.

Meghahatuburu Iron ore Project Mine were transferred to SAIL and by virtue of Tripartite Settlement dtd . 6-9-79 and Settlement dtd . 30-6-83 and the Memorandum of agreement dtd.19-6-79 arrived and thereafter details of this meeting and entering into agreement has been mentioned . In view ofthe agreement adopted by the workmen of MIOP mine and the management there is no provision of making employments of daily rated workman on consolidated total wage denying the several benefits of the above said tripartite settlement prevailing at present , other laws , viz . E.L. , H.P.L, free medical treatment to dependants , Housing, L.T.C. etc and subjecting them to hire and fire . The management ofMIOP mine has arbitrarily and unilaterally employed about 250 total number ofso -called Casual Daily Rated Khalasis on different dates during 31-10-1985 to June 1986 on a consolidated total wage of Rs . 37.90 per day of attendance and duty during duty hours without any other benefits . The management of MIOP has also employed since July, 1986 some Junior Electricians , Assistant Light Vehicle Drivers . Time Keeper as daily rated workmen on consolidated daily wages of Rs . 38.30 per day and subsequently to Rs . 39,73 per day. Similarly Assistant Light Vehicle Drivers and Time Keepers were employed at consolidated daily wage of Rs . 38.30 per day and subsequently to Rs . 40.39 per day. Other conditions of service of Daily paid Jr. Electricians , Asstt. LVDS , Time Keepers etc. are the same as to the D.R.Ks stated above. These workman are also entitled to avail the standard designations and standard monthly rated pay at standard scales of pay and all benefits of tripartite settlement . The management has regularised some 109 daily rated Khalasis (DRKS) who have completed two years of service . This is without any settlement with the recognised Trade Union or any other trade Unions functioning at MIOP mine . Thisisbreach of settlement dated 30-6-1983 adopting the NJCSAgreement dated 25th May, 1983 and other statutory provisions . The concerned daily rated workmen have been doing same and identical jobs as their regular counterparts in MIOP Mine are or have been doing on better wage and other service conditions . Also the concerned daily rated aforesaid workman have been employed on sanctioned postand recruited on their names have been sponsored bythe Employement Exchange on requisition of regular workmen. They deserve regularisation w.e.f. the date of joining the service . The management has violated the statutory settlements and other statutes . Daily rated workmen and also those DRKS who have been regularised after two years of service as DRKS are entitled to the benefits of the award that will emerge out of the adjudication ofthis case . The Union had made demand to regularise the daily rated workmen and did not agree to the management's proposal of keeping the daily rated workmen for a period of two years before regularising them as monthly rated on standard scales of pay and all other benefits of settlement dated 30-6-83 adopting NJCS agreement of 25-5-83 and other statutory benefits and other benefits . An Industrial dispute was raised before the ALC( C) Chaibasa because the management started bipartite negotiations on this very dispute during pendency ofthe conciliation with the Bokaro Steel Workers Union Meghahatuburu Branch and it failed . Ultimately

3. Onbehalf of the management W. S. has been filed stating therein that the reference is bad in law and not maintainable . Bokaro Steel Workers Union , Bokaro Steel City isrecognised by the managerment of SAIL , Bokaro Steel Plant and the Bokaro Steel Workers Union functioning among the workmen of Meghahatuburu Iron Ore Project (MIOP) is a branch of the Bokaro Steel Workers Union . The Bokaro Steel Workers Union , MIOP Branch served a strike notice on 6-11-86 on 7 - point charter of demands , including demand for regularisation and confirmation of services of all the daily rated Khalasis and Jr. Electricians . Thereafter a conciliation proceeding started before the ALC( C ) Chaibasa. On 26-12-86 it was stated before the Conciliation Officer that the dispute was under bipartite negotiation between the management and the Bokaro Steel Workers Union and an adjoumment was sought on that ground . On 5-1-87 a tripartite negotiation took place in the office of the management in which amongst others , was attended by the Zonal Secretary of Bokaro Steel Workers Union , MIOP branch . On 5-1-87 it was informed to the union that the daily rated workman of MIOP would be considered for regularisation on completion of two years as per practice followed at Bokaro Steel City and the union representative agreed this in principle . However , no formal minutes of discussion was drawn . The conciliation Officer fixed another date i.e. 27-4-87 for conciliation in this regard . AMemorandum of settlement between the management of SAIL , Bokaro Steel Plant and the representative of Bokaro Steel Workers Union was signed on 26-6-87 in presence of thể DI . Labour Commissioner - cum- Conciliation Officer , Govt . of Bihar wherein it was agreed that the casual workers who are on the rolls of the Company and have completed two years and more of service would be regularised after completing the formalities as per existing rules. In terms of the settlement the workmen posted in the plant at Bokaro Steel City and posted in MIOP have been regularised . 66 Casual Workmen of MIOP have already been regularised w.e.f. 1-11-87 . Three workmen could not be regularised as they were facing departmental enquiry . The approval for regularisation of 40 more Casual employees who have completed two years as on 31-1-88 have also been conveyed . The cases of 7 workmen have already been processed for regularisation and the cases of remaining workmen was on the process in terms of settlement. MIOP being a part of the Bokaro Steel Plant there should not be different criteria for regularisation of casual workmen of MIOP . Prayer has been made to pass an Award holding that in view of settlement dtd . 26-6-87 there is no industrial dispute of the workmen of MIOP .

भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ] [भाग

4. From perusal of record it appears that Bokaro Steel Workers Union did not submit any statment ofclaim and further no action was taken to contest the case and they were keeping silence over the matter . After about 1½ year the NMDC workers union which is not a party to the reference submitted a claim on 24-3-88 . Thereafter as perdirection of this Tribunal management submitted the aforesaid Written Statement and thereafter NMDC Mines Workers Union submitted rejoinder on 10-8-88 . Thereafter thewitnesseswere examined , cross-examined.by NMDC Minces Workers Union . There was further development that the NMDC Mines Workers Union did not take interest in the case and was not appearing but Bokaro Steel Workers Union appeared suddenly and adduced evidence.

Points to be décided

Whether the management of Meghahatuburu Iron Ore Project of M/ s . BSL under Sail is justifed in not regularising the daily rated workmen viz . Khalasi & Electrician? If not, to what relief the workmen concerned are entitled?"

Finding with reasons

The workman side in order to substantiate their claim has examied two witnesses viz . WW- 1 and WW-2 and got the documents marked as Ext . W- 1 , W- 2 , W- 3 , W -4 , W- 5 , W-6 and W-7. On the other hand management side has examined one witness viz . MW- l and has got document marked as Ext . M - 1 , M -2 , M -3 and M-4 .

7.The representative of the concerned workmen has vehemently argued that the names of the concerned workmen were forwarded by theEmployment exchange to the management and the mangement in this response had issued interview letter for the post ofKhalasi Grade - Il and Junior Electricians . As per interview letter the basic pay of Khalasi Grade- II was mentioned as Rs . 550/- and for Junior Electriocian as 565/- per month with other allowances . The concerned workmen had appeared before the interview board in response to the interview letter . The concerned workman were selected by the interview Board and thereafter they were appointed. However , the management arbitrarily started making less wages than the scale ofwages mentioned in the interview letter stating by the management that the workmen were appointed on daily wages basis . In course of argument instances have been placed as to how arbitrarily payments were made to the concerned workmen. It has mainly been argued that when the concerned workmen were selected and appointed as per interview letter they ought to have been placed in the pay scale as mention in the interview letter and not as daily rated employees and payment ought not to have been made on such basis and the concerned workmen should be regulasised from the date of their joining which has not been done in the instant case . Accordingly the concerned workmen should be regularised from the date of appointment i.e. Khalasi Grade - II w.e.f. October , 1985 and Junior Electrician w.e.f. July , 1986 and difference ofback wages and othere consequential benefits with interest thereon be paid. bi

4477

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

8. The representative of the management has vehemently argued that the case of the workmen has no merit at all . All the concerned workmen have been regularised in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties. He has also submitted that when the interview letter was issued and the candidates were interviewed they were not found fit for appoinment for the grade for which they were called for. However, keeping the need of the company the concerned workmen were engaged as daily ratedworkers and payments were made accordingly. It has further been submitted that the settlements were arrived and when the candidates were in position to work with ability then their services have been regularised after two years of their engagement.

9. In this case several points and several arguments have been raisedby the parties . However, as per reference the only question arisen regarding regularisation of the concerned workmen . The fact of regularisation of the concerned workmen has not been disputed by the concerned workmen.All it appears that they are demanding their regularisation from different date since they were engaged/appointed on different dates.

1 10. In this context it will be relevant to mention that from perusal ofrecord and as well as Ext. M- 2which relates to the matter of settlement regarding regularisation in which it was agreed that all the casual workers who were on the rolls of the company and have completed two years or more would be regularised . It appears that settlement was arrived in the presence of the representative of the workmen ofBokaro Steel Workers Union and also in presence of the Dy. Labour Commissioner , Conciliation Officer . There after it further appears that Ext . M-4 series were issued regarding the matter of regularisation of the concerned workmen . It will be relevant to mention that terms ofreference does not show to examine the validity of the settlement arrived at between the parties in dispute . However, no any order has been brought on record to show that the said settlement has been set aside .

11.Now the question arises that what were the terms of interview and how the concerned workmen were provided employment. WW- 1 has stated that his name was forwarded by Employment Exchange to the management for interview . He received interview letter for the post of Junior Electrician . The basic pay of the post was.No. 565. He has proved interview letter Ext . W-3, After selection management did not pay any salary according to his scale as given in the interview letter . Rather he was given appointment on temporary daily wages basis @ Rs . 25.91p . per day . This wage was paid for two years . After confirmation management started to pay his salary according to the scale. As per interview letter instead of regularising his services from the date ofjoining regularised him after rendering two years service on temporary daily wages basis . During cross-examination he has said that accepting the condition as laid down in the appointment letter they joined their services but they want to get relief as per interview letter: He has proved his joining letter Ext . W-5. The other workman also submitted their joining letter before they joined in the service . He has no knowledge 4478

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 /SRAVANA 18 , 1930

about the tripartite settlement . He has denied that his claim isnotjustified.

12. In the same way another WW - 2 has, stated that he is working in Khalasi Grade - I . Employment Exchange had forwarded his name to the management for his appointment as Khalasi Grade- II . From his evidence it appears that in the same was as stated by WW- 1 he was working. Interview letter was issued for the scale ofpay for Rs. 550/- and allowance in Grade - II Khalasi . He appeared for interview and selected and he was appointed on the wages fixing Rs . 22.45 P. per day There is difference in the terms ofcondition in the letter of offer of appointment and in the interview letter. During cross- examination he has stated that accepting the condition laid down in the appointment letter they joined the services but they did not get reljef as per condition laid down in the interview letter.He has no knowledge about the tripartite settlement for regularisation after two years .

13. From the evidence of both the WWs it appears that they were interviewed for different scale and terms and conditions but they were appointed/ engaged as daily rated worker on the basis of payment of daily wages which is much below than the pay scale mentioned in the interview letter .

14. Ext . W-3 is a interview letter in which there is mention ofpost of Junior Electrician in the scale of Rs . 565- 761.From perusal of Ext . W-4 which is offer letter containing the terms and condition that the concerned workman would be placed as Jr. Electrician on casual basis @ 25.91P. showing duration of appointment as 3 months and other conditions mentioned therein . From perusal of Ext . W-5 it appears that after issuance of letter of appointment the concerned workman Digambar Jha reported for duty as daily rated Junior Electrician @ Rs . 25.91 P. Similar is the casewith WW-2 in whose favour interview letter and offer of appointment have been issued. From perusal of Ext. W-8 appears to be the document for medical examination for the purpose of selection of khalasi on casual basis subject to the condition that he is medically fit found by theMedical Board.

15. From the above document and also from the evidence of WW- 1 and WW -2 it appears that they were called for interview giving certain pay scale but after interview the concerned workmen have been appointed as casual employees . There is no document on the record that they had raised any objection in this matter at the time oftheir employment rather the evidence and materials on record specifically show that at the time of giving offer of appointment it was specifically stated that they are going to be appointed on casual basis on daily wages basis on fixed daily wages and thereafter the concerned workmen joined without raising any objection . In this situation nothing has been told that concerned workmen joined the job against their desire rather they agreed to work on casual against t basis on fixedon fixed daily wages .

16. From perusal of evidence of MW - I it appears that he has stated about the facts of regularisation of the employees at different scales of pay. He has also said about the tripartite negotiation on 5-1-87 at Bokaro Steel City in

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] which Zonal Secretary of Bokaro Steel Workers Union , Meghatuburu Branch had participated . He has further stated about the facts relating to the matter of settlement . During cross -examination nothing specific question about the terms and conditions of interview letter and offer of appointment has been put to this witness .

17. Before making further discussion it may be mentioned that nothing specific has been argued on behalf of the concerned workmen that settlement arrived at between the parties is not valid and legal or suffer from illegality. Argument has been advanced that the aforesaid settlement has nothing to do with this case as the demand ofthe concerned workman is for regularisation from the date of their joining the services . It has been submitted that the settlement has nothing to do with the reference.

18. In the above context it will again be relevantto mention the order of reference which speaks as follows : - "Whether the management of Meghahatuburu Iron Ore Project ofM/s . BSL under SAIL is justified in not regularising the daily rated workmen viz. Khalasi & Jr. Electrician. If not , towhat reliefthe workmen concerned are entitled? " 19. A plain reading of order of reference , it appears that the matter relates only to decide the question of not regularising the daily rated workmen . As mentioned earlier it is not in dispute that the concerned workmen have not been regularised after completing of two years of service in view of settlement between the parties . It will be relevant to mention that in the order of reference though no specific date has been mentioned from which the question of regularisation of the concerned workmen have to be decided yet no amendment or corrigendum has been received relating to the order of reference . It appears that this order of reference has been issued on 6-11-87 and settlement between the parties were arrived in the year 1988.

20.As mentioned earlier it is not in dispute that the concerned workmen have been regularised. However, they have been regularised after completion of 2 years of service and the reference relates only to the regularisation of the concerned workmen. Only question has been raised that they ought to have been regularised from the date of interview/ appointment and not after completion of two years of their service .

21. As mentioned above offer of appointment does not state anything that the concerned workman are going to be appointed in a particular scale rather shows that they are appointed on daily wages basis as casual employees and itappears that the concerned workmen had agreed for such appointment and they joined the services . This Court cannot travel beyond the terms of reference . The reference does not speak anything to consider the case of regularisation from the date of initial appointment .

22. In the above circumstances the concerned workmen are not entitled to get any relief.

AnAward is passed accordingly .

NAGENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 11 जुलाई , 2008

का. आ. 2198, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एच. पी. जनरल इन्ड्रस्ट्रीज कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में । केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. आई. डी. सं. 77/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

4479

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18, 1930

for the grievances of workman. The reference which was referred by the Central Government is:

"Whether the action of the management of H.P. General Industries Corporation Ltd. , in not regularizing the services of their employees working ondaily rated basis in their Kogi and Delagh Mines , in Distt. Bilaspur having service of 10 years andmore , isjust and legal , in view ofSupreme Court Judgment and decision of H.P. Government ? If not , to what reliefthese employees are entitled to and from which date?"

[सं. एल-29011 /10/ 1996- आईआर (एम ) ]

कमल बाखरु , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 11th July, 2008 S.O. 2198.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1.D. No. 77/96) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh , as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of H. P. General Industry Corporation Ltd. , and their workmen, which was received bythe CentralGovernment on 11-07-2008 .

[No. L- 29011 / 10/ 1996- IR(M)]

KAMAL BAKHRU, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDERA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. 1.D. No. 77/96

General Secretary,

KogiKaramchari Sangh , Village-Delagh, P.O. Nichili Mether , Tehsil- Sadar,

Distt. -Bilaspur(H.P)

..Applicant

Versus

Managing Director ,

H.P. General Industry Corporation Ltd.

NewHim-RusBuilding,

Shimla- 171001 .

After receiving the reference , the workman Karamchari Sangh through Mr. J.C. Bhardwaj , General Secretary, filed his statement of claim with the prayer that the workinan at Serial No. 1-15, 18, 22-30 be declared to be regularized w.e.f. 1-1-94 . The workman at serial No. 16, 17 , 31, be declaredto be regularized w.e.f. 1-3-94, 1-5-95 and 1-3-97 respectively. Apart from it, mandatory benefits of the pay scales , increments and other service benefits be awarded to the workman through this award. The workman have further prayed that the respondent be penalized with the penal interest at the rate of 18%, as all the actions of the management were illegal, unjustified and without any cogent reasons . The workmen have stated in the statement ofclaim that, Kogi Karamchari Sangh Union , affiliated to All India Trade Union Congress , and is duly authorized by the members to raise and contest the following industrial dispute under reference:

That31 workman mentioned in the statement of claim were entitled for the above mentioned relieves w.e.f. 1-1-94 or subsequent date with the workman completes the tenure of 10 years service on daily wages.

That the contention of the workman is supported by Hon'ble Supreme Court Judgment in writ petition serial no. 787 of 1987 Mool Raj Upadhyaya Vs. State ofHimachal Pradesh .

.Respondent

APPEARANCES

Forthe workmen:

Sri J. C. Bhardwaj

SriV.K.Gupta

For the management :

AWARD

Passed on 20-6-2008

The reference of the Central Government dated 12-8-96 , which was referred vide order L- 29011 / 10/96 (D) , gave an opportunity to this tribunal for judicial adjudication Management filed the written statement with the preliminary objection that on a demand notice dated 10-8-93, the matter was settled between the union and the management in the meeting held on 7-9-93 . Subsequently, the Union backed down for settlement vide their letter dated 30-12-93 , and some fresh demands raised vide letter dated 18-4-96. The workman also resorted to strike w.e.f. 3-5-96. Thereafter , the fresh settlement arrived during the course of conciliation proceedings before the Assistant Labour Commissioner(C) on 18-5-96 . After the said settlement the reference in question referred by Central Government is not maintainable . Furthermore , on merits the management has also categorically stated the reasons for regularization of all the workmen named in the claim petition w.e.f. 1-1-98 . It has also been stated in the written statement that the Apex Court judgment titled as Mool Raj Upadhyaya Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others , was applicable to the workmen employed with PWD, Public Health and Irrigation Department ofthe Himachal Pradesh 4480

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART 11-SEC . 3( ii) ] StateGovernment for their conversion to work charged from daily waged workers . Considering the interest of workers of other various departments , the Government, thereafter, vide its circular No. P.E.R. (AP - 11 ) , B- (2-5/ 86 III) , dated 11-7-95 ordered for regularization of daily waged workers who have completed 10 years or more continuous service with 240 days ( minimum) in a calendar year as on 31-3-95 , w.e.f. 1-4-95 subject to the availability ofpost .

Regularization of Muster Roll /daily wager prepared by the Government of Himachal Pradesh was placed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and was discussed. The Hon'ble Apex Court having regard to the additional financial obligations that may be incurred by the proposed scheme for regularization , modify the scheme with the direction that the State shall not be burdened with the financial obligations arising out of payment of arrears for the period prior to 1-1-94 , and the scheme , as modified , may be brought into operation w.e.f. 1-1-94 . The scheme which was approved by the Hon'ble the Apex Court is as follows: -

( 1) Daily- wage/ muster - roll , whether skilled or unskilled , who have completed 10 years or more of continuous service with a minimum of240 days in a calendar year on 31-12-1993 , shall be appointed as work-charged employees w.e.f. 1-1-1994 and shall be put in the time- scale ofpay applicable to the corresponding lowest grade in the Government .

Since there is no work charge cadre and no regular post were available with the respondent , therefore , the Government instructions dated 11-7-95 could not be implemented. The Government , therefore issued further instructions vide notification No. P.E.R. (AP) -C - B ( II )-11 97, dated 1.1-12-97 whereby, it was ordered that if vacant post are not available , posts be created and workers be regularized as per terms and conditions laid down in the notification self. Accordingly, respondent created the posts and eligible daily waged workers were regularized w.e.f.1-1-98 .

(2) Daily - wage/ muster - roll workers, whether skilled or unskilled , who have not completed 20 years of continuous service with a minimum of240 days in a calendar year on 31-12-1993 , shall be appointed as work- charged employees w.e.f. the date they complete the said period of 10 years of service and on such appointment they shall be putin the time-scale of pay applicable to the lowest grade in the Government .

Ithas also been stated in the written statement that theworkers mentioned at serial No. 5 and 8 of the statement of claims had already been relieved on their request for premature retirement on 11-7-97 and 31-10-97 respectively. The workers mentioned at serial No. 18 , 29 and 30 had already superannuated on 31-12-95. Hence , they were not inemployment on 1-1-98 . The remaining workers had been regularized . The heavy cost of litigation which the management has incurred has been claimed from the Union .

On behalf of the workman Karamchari Sangh , affidavitwas filed by Sri Lekh Ram . In his affidavit he has narrated the similar facts as are mentioned in the petition forclaim.

(3) Daily-wage/ muster - roll workers , whether skilled or unskilled who have not completed 10 years of service with a minimum of 240 days in a calendar year on 31-12-1993 , shall be paid daily wages at the rates prescribed bythe Government of Himachal Pradesh from time to time for daily-wage employees falling in Class III and Class IV till they are appointed as work- charged employees in accordance with paragraph 2 .

Onbehalf of the workmen petitioner Sri Rooplal , Secretary, General Kogi and Dail Bhav Karamchari Sangh has also filed the affidavit.

Onbehalf of the management Sri M. S. Phatanyia , General Manager Kogi and Delagh Mining Projects has filedthe affidavit.

(4) Daily- wage/ muster - roil workers shall be regularized in a phased manner on the basis of seniority- cum -suitability including physical fitness . On regularization they shall be put in the minimum of the time - scale payable to the corresponding lowest grade applicable to the Government and would be entitled to all the other benefits to regular Government servants of the corres- ponding grade .

Para 5, of the judgment once again make clear that the scheme, as modified shall be implemented w.e. f. 1-1-94 and ifany excess amount has been received by the employee on the basis of the interim order passed by this Court , the same shall not be required to be refunded by him.

Thus , after going through the judgment of Hon'ble the Apex Court, it is clear that this judgment was basically for class III and class IV employees of the Irrigation and PublicHealth Wings of the Himachal Pradesh Public Works Department. The workers of Irrigation and Public Health Wings , of the Himachal Pradesh Public Works Department were the parties to the case .

have heard learned counsel for the parties . Parties have also submitted the written arguments . After going through the written arguments of parties , documents filed by the parties, oral evidence adduced by the parties and thejudgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in Mool Raj's case , I am of the view that in the judgment pronounced in Mool Raj Upadhyaya Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and published in 1994 supplementary- (2) Supreme Court cases 316, Hon'ble the Apex Court has directed the Government ofHimachal Pradesh to regularized the class III and class IV employeesof Irrigation and Public Health Wings , ofthe Himachal Pradesh Public Works Department, who were paidtheir daily wages as per the minimum wage prescribed bytheGovernment of Himachal Pradesh from time to time. In this case the Scheme for Betterment (appointment) , 4481 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

the case laws as mentioned above , it is further clear that the Government of Himachal Pradesh was very keen to give the benefit ofregularization scheme to the daily waged workers of other departments then P.W.D. , Public Health and Irrigation Department of Himachal Pradesh . The two Govt. orders ofthe Government of Himachal Pradesh shows the sincerity ofthe Government that in compliance of the directions of Hon'ble Apex Court in Mool Chand's case (supra), the remedy, was extended to the daily waged workers ofother departments and it was ordered that they be regularized w.e.f. 1-1-1998 , after creation ofthe vacancies intheir respective departments . All the workers present in the department on 1-1-1998 were regularized. The management has also shown the reasons for regularizing the daily waged workers of other department then Public Health and Irrigation Department of Himachal Pradesh from 1-1-1998 . No doubt, this is the regularization on the basis of the scheme approved by Hon'ble Apex Court in Mool Chand's case (supra) , but in different context as stated earlier . Accordingly, the management has given the benefit for the regularization of daily waged workers on the basis ofsame scheme as approved by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Mool Raj Uphadaya's case (supra) , but in different possible context . There is no grievance of any of the workman on their regularizationbut the grievance is that they should be given thebenefit of the scheme approved by Hon'ble Apex Court inMool Chand's case ( supra) from 1-1-1994.

Considering the interest of workers of various other departments , theGovernment of Himachal Pradesh vide its circular no . PER(AP - 11 ) . B-(2-5/ 86 III ) dated 11-7-1995 , ordered for regularization of daily waged workers who have completed 10 years or more continuous service with 240 days (minimum) in a calendar year as on 31-3-1995 , w.e.f. 1-4-1995 subject to the availability of post . Thus , after considering the materials on record , it is evident that the benefits of scheme of the Government regarding the regularization of the daily wagers of P.W.D. , Public Health and Irrigation Department. of the Himachal Pradesh State Government, as approved by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Mool Chand's case ( supra) , was extended to other departments as well and vide the Government notification no- PER(AP - 11 ) . B-(2-5/86 III), on the daily waged workers working in other departments . The service ofdaily waged workers who have completed 10 years or more continuous service with 240 days(minimum) in a calendar year , were to be regularized w.e.f. 1-4-1995 subject to the availability of post . Thus , it was an arrangement made by the State Government on the basis of the scheme approved by Hon'ble Apex Court in Mool Chand's case ( supra) , for the workers of P. W.D. , Public Health and Irrigation Department, to the workers of other departments as well . Their regularization as per the said notification dated 11-7-1995 was subject to the availability ofpost . There was no regular post available with the management . Thus, the Government issued another instructions vide notification no . PER(AB) - C-B-(2)-II-97 , dated 11-12-1997 in which it was ordered that ifvacant post are not available post be created and workers be regularized on the basis of terms and conditions laid down in the notification itself. Accordingly , the management created the post and eligible waged workers were regularized w.e.f. 1-1-1998.

This scheme was especially for the employees of P.W.D. , Public Health and Irrigation Deartment ofHimachal Pradesh and not for the other daily waged workers working inother department. The Government of Himachal Pradesh vidę notification No. PER(AP- 11 ) . B-(2-5/ 86 III ), extended this scheme to the daily waged workers of the other departments . Moreover , para 4 , of the scheme of Government ofHimachal Pradesh as approved by Hon'ble Apex Court mentioned that the regularization ofdaily waged workers is to be taken in a phased manner on the bases of seniority- cum -suitability including physical fitness . That was also taken care of.

The principles laid down in Gehar Singh's case (supra) are not applicable because in the said case , question before Hon'bleApex Court was regarding the modified scheme of State Government . By the subsequent notification , Government of Himachal Pradesh, modified the scheme which was approved by Hon'ble Apex Court in Mool Chand's case ( supra) . After going through the entire materials on record and all the three judgments ofHon'ble Apex Court namely Mool Chand's case (supra) , Umadevi's case (supra) , and Gehar Singh's case (supra ) , I am of the viewthat the daily waged workers were rightly regularized from 1-1-1998 .

Onbehalf of the workman, my attention was drawn onanotherjudgment ofthe Hon'ble Apex Court which was download from the Internet, State of Himachal Pradesh and others Vs. Gehar Singh . This judgment is pronounced by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 037 of2007 arising out of SLP No. 5863/2006 on February 27 , 2007. In thisjudgment the norms laid down in Mool Raj Uphadaya's case were discussed by Hon'ble Apex Court and this appeal waskept pending till the disposal ofcivil appeal Nos . 3595 to 3612/1999 , Secretary State of Karnataka and others Vs. Uma Devi and others . After the pronouncement of the judgment inUma Devi's case (supra) this judgment in Gehar Singh'scase (supra) was pronounced by the Apex Court . The dispute in the case was based on the modified policy ofState Government of Himachal Pradesh dated 6-5-2000 onthe regularization of daily waged workers . Hon'ble Apex Court in Gehar Singh's case ( supra) directed the management to give the benefit ofthe Government scheme as approved by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Mool Chand's case w.e.f. 1-4-1998. I have also gone through the principles of law laid down in Uma Devi's case . After going through

On the basis of the above observations , the reference isaccordingly answered in positive that the action of the management of Himachal Pradesh General Industries CorporationLimited, in not regularizing the services of their 4482

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 /SRAVANA 18 , 1930

Thiscase coming up for final hearing on 24-12-2007 , thisTribunal-cum- Labour Court on 28-12-2007 passed the following.

AWARD

This is a reference made under Section 10( 1) (d) of I.D. Act . The reference is " Whether the action of management of Cochin Refineries Ltd. to limit on duty facility to office bearers of the unions to attend conciliation proceedings for issues of collective nature is justified? If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled to ? "

employees working of the daily rates post in their Kogi and Delag mines in District Bilaspur, having services of 10 years and more is just and legal. The other part of the reference is that whether it was just and proper in view of the Apex Court judgment . In the opinion of this Tribunal , it was justified to regularized the services of the daily waged workers of the other departments of Himachal Pradesh Government from 1-1-1998 on the basis of the scheme of Govt. of Himachal Pradesh as approved by Hon'ble Apex Court in Mool Raj's case ( supra) . Central Government be informedaccordingly. File be consigned.

G.K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 11 जुलाई , 2008

का. आ. 2199.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार कोचीन रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय ईर्नाकुलम के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. आई. डी. सं. - 78/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-07-2008 प्राप्त हुआ था ।

2. The facts of the case in brief are as follows:- The union contends that it represents majority of the employees of the company . The service conditions of workmen and trade union activities are governed by statutory settlements . It was the practice and custom that the union office bearers of major trade unions were given ' duty relief for attending conciliation proceedings . That practice is not stopped by the management putting the office bearers of trade union to loss of money and trouble . The privilege is limited to collective and common issues . It is highly arbitrary . Duty relief is a long prevailing custom and it is part of service conditions . It cannot be altered without notice U/ s . 9 - A of 1. D. Act .

[फा. सं. एल-30012/33/1999- आई. आर. ( एम. ) ] कमल बाखरु , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 11th July, 2008

S.O. 2199. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. I.D. 78/2006) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ernakulam, as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cochin Refineries Ltd. , and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 11-07-2008 .

[F.No. L- 30012/ 33 / 1999 - IR( M ) ] KAMAL BAKHRU, Desk Officer

3. According to the management the industrial dispute is not maintainable . Recognized trade unions functioning in the company are allowed to take part in conciliation meetings in industrial disputes of collective nature . The present union is in the habit of raising trivial individual industrial disputes with a view to avail duty off and avoid work . This union has thus raised 40 industrial disputes out of which 33 disputes are individual disputes . Whereas the other union in the company raised only 4 disputes all ofwhich are collective in nature . The present union has 6 office bearers and 17 executive committee members and anyone of the office bearers can attend conciliation meetings . Concession of 'on duty facility ' extended to office bearers of union does not form part of any settlement and it is not a service condition. Hence no notice U/ s.9 - A of 1. D. Act is required to alter it .

ANNEXURE

4. In the light of the above pleadings the following points arise for consideration .

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM

1. Is ' on duty facility' a service condition ?

Present: Shri.P.L.Norbert , B.A. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer (Friday the 28th day of December 2007/ 7th Pousha 1929)

2. Is the action of management in limiting ' on duty facility' to issues of collective nature , correct ?

1.D. No. 78/2006

3. Regarding reliefs .

(I.D. 74/99 of Labour Court, Emakulam)

The evidence consists of the oral testimony of WW 1 and documentary evidence of Exts . W1 and W2 on the side of the union and MW1 on the side of the management.

Union : The General Secretary , Kochi Refineries Employees Association, Ambalamughal . By Adv.Sri.C.S.Ajith Prakash .

Management : The General Manager (HRM ) , Kochi Refineries Ltd. , Ambalamughal. By Adv . M/ s . Menon & Pai .

5. Points No.1 and 2: - It is an admitted fact that ' on duty facility' to attend conciliation proceedings was extended to office bearers of union for quite some time in the past irrespective of the nature of industrial disputes , whether collective or individual . But of late the management 4483 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9, 2008/श्रावण 18 , 1930.

thought it not wise to continue the same facility concerning individual industrial disputes . They felt that the unions weremisusing the facility for avoiding work in the company. Hence they stopped the facility in respect of individual disputes and continued to extent to disputes of collective nature and involving common issues . According to the union the decision of the management is unilateral, and illegal and the facility by long use has assumed the nature of a service condition . It is also contended that it forms part ofBipartite Settlement .

composite settlement of individual claims including the recognition of the Federation as a trade union and service condition ofworkmen and therefore the term of settlement canbe replaced or changed only by another settlement afterdiscussion between the parties . Hence a notice issued to Federation to show cause why it should not be derecognized as it is an unfair labour practice covered by item 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and prevention of unfair Labour Practices Act. Thisdecision stands on a different footing from the facts of the present case, Since recognition of Federation ofunions was part of a Bipartite Settlement the Bombay High Court had held so . But in the instant case the ' on duty facility' is not a part of any Bipartite Settlement . MoreoverMaharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention ofunfair Labour Practices Act was applicable inthe decided case. Hence the ruline does not apply to the facts of this case.

6. Itmaybe noted that the union has not been able to point out any settlement which Contains a clause regarding ' on duty facility' . Therefore the next question iswhether by long practice, has it become a privilege or customary concession within item 8 of 4th schedule of I.D. Act. It is argued by the learned counsel for the management that condition of service made mention in 4th schedule relate to workmen and not union office bearers . Item 8 of 4th schedule is : " withdrawal of any customary concession or privilege or change in usage" .

10. In the light of the above legal position that' on duty facility' is not a service condition of a privilege ofthe workmen fallingwithin item No.8 of4th Schedule to I.D.Act, and that no notice u/s.9- A ofthe Act is required for making analteration in the facility, I find that there is nothing wrong or illegal in the action of the management in limiting the facility to industrial dispute's of collective nature alone. Points are answered accordingly..

11. Point No.3 :-In view of the above findings the union is not entitled for any relief.

7. S.9 -A of the Act speaks of a notice to be given to workmen who are likely to be affected by any change in the service conditions . But that 4th schedule does not refer to any service condition applicable to trade union office bearers . The learned counsel for the management also relied on the following decisions to bring home his contention that the facility given to workmen is not a service condition and no notice u/s . 9-A ofthe Act is required for making a change in the concession.

In the result, an award is passed finding that the action of the management in limiting 'on duty facility' to office bearers ofunions to attend conciliation proceedings indisputes of collective nature alone is legal and justified . The union is not entitled for any relief. The parties will suffer their respective costs .

The award will take effect one month after its publication inofficial gazette.

Typed, corrected and passed by me on this the 28th dayofDecember , 2007.

P. L. NORBERT, PresidingOfficer Appendix

8. In A.S. Union , TNEB V. TNEB & Ors . 1984 - II - LW 478 (para- 10), it is held by Madras High Court that trade unionism is recognized all over the world. But that does not mean that an office bearer or any trade union can claim , as ofright, to do trade union activities during office hours. Aconcession extended by Electricity Beard from time to time, does not however form part of the service conditions and it cannot fall within item 8 of Schedule- IV of I.D.Act . Hence management need not comply with, S.9 -A of the Act for making a change in the concession . The same view istaken by Madras & Bombay High Courts in workmen of Indian Bank Vs. Management of Indian Bank 1994- II -LLJ 497 and Blue Star Ltd. V. Blue Star Workers ' Union & ors . 1996 1 CLR673 .

Witness for the Union

WW1-26-11-2007 Sri.P.N.Surendran Nair.

Witness forManagement

MW1-03-12-2007 Sri.S. Vijayakumar.

Exhibit for Union

WI - 16-03-99 Photostat copy of representation submitted by union the ALC , Ernakulam.

W2-23-04-99 Photostat copy of reply submitted by management before the ALCO, 9.Onthe contrary the learned counsel for the union relied on the decision of Bombay High court in Blue Star workers Union V. B.S. Bhandange 1998 Lab 1 C2880, to say that change of a privilege without notice u ' /s.9- A of. theAct is an unfair labour practice . In the decided case the Federation ofUnions was recognized as the sole bargaining agent of employees. Settlements were arrived at between Federation of Unions and management regarding service matters of employees . After several years , management issued a notice to the federation to show cause as to why the Federation shall not be derecognized. It is held in Para- 2 at page 2886 that the settlement dated 1-11-1985 was a Exhibit for Management -Nil .

2823 GI /08-18 4484

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 9 ; 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

AWARD

नई दिल्ली , 14 जुलाई, 2008

TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L-40012 / 112/2001 / IR( DU) dated 11-07-2001 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section (i) and sub - section 2 ( A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following disputeto this Tribunal for adjudication:

का. आ . 2200.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार महानगर टेलीफोन निगम लिमिटेड , के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. सी जी आई.टी -2/92 ऑफ 2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो कैन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -40012 /112/2001- आईआर ( डी. यू. ) ]

"Whether the action of the management of MTNL , Mumbai by dismissing Shri Arun Sahu Salvi from the services of MTNL, Mumbai is justified and proper? Ifnot, then what reliefthe workman is entitled to?"

सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 14th July , 2008

2. Claim statement is filed by second party workman at Ex- 7 making out case that , he joined first party on 8-4- 1980 as Casual Mazdoor on daily wages ofRs . 7.25 ps . per day.According to him he worked continuously for 9 years and was discharging his duties sincerely.

S.O. 2200. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. CGIT- 2/92 of2001) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court No. II , Mumbai , as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited and their workmen , which was received by theCentral Government on 14-07-2008 .

3.He contends that, he was illegally terminated on 24-06-1989 without following due process of law . He states that, that time he was getting wages Rs . 1,200 p.m. According to him, he worked for more than 240 days in each calendar year in 9 years span of his service . Even identity card was issued by first party.

[No. L-40012/ 112/2001 - IR(DU)]

SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI

PRESENT

A. A. Lad

PresidingOfficer

Reference No. CGIT- 2/92 of 2001

4.He states that he was falsely involved in criminal alleging mis - connection of telephone lines . Even he was arrested and prosecuted before Metropolitan Magistrate . He was acquitted by Metropolitan Magistrate in the said case. After that he approached first party and requested to give hím employment but if was not considered . He states that one Yogesh Sharma was also involved in the case .He was co -accused in the said case, He was also acquitted . ButSharma was reinstated. However second party was not . So he prayed to reinstate in the employment like Sharma and request to cure discrimination made against him by re- appointing him. 1

Employers in Relation to the Management of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. , Mumbai

TheDivisional Engineer (Bldg.)

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. Byculla Telephone Exchange Building Mumbai - II

Mumbai 400 011 .

5.This is disputed by first party by filing reply at Ex- 14 making out case that, action of termination taken against concerned workman dated 24-06-1989 which was followed bythe termination order dated 18-7-1989 is challenged by him by letter dated 31-03-2000 i.e, nearly about after 11 years and on that count alone his prayer cannot be considered.

And

TheinWorkmen

6. He was prosecuted and arrestedby the Police. He was in police custody. He was tried by the Metropolitan Magistrate . Only because he was acquitted , does not mean that he is innocent .

Shri Arun Sahu Salvi Opp. Talao Road No.27

Behind Sion Garage

Wagle Industrial Estate

Thane (W)-400 604 .

APPEARANCES

Fortheemployer : Mr. S.R.Rajguru Advocate

FortheWorkmen : Mr. M.B.Anchan Advocate

Mumbai , dated 13th June, 2008.

7. It isfurther stated that he was appointed as Casual Mazdoor on daily wages . He did not work continuously for 240 days in each calendar year as claimed by him . Work order was issued which was of particular span and to comply that work order he was attending work . It is denied that, he worked continuously for 9 years and that he worked for more than 240 days in each calender year . It is denied thatdiscrimination was shown against him. He was arrested [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

by police on 31-05-1989 and was in police custody till 05-06-1989 . When he attended his duties on 06-06-1989 he did no disclose that fact . However police informed about hisarrest and police custody when he was in employment and so termination order was issued dated 24-06-1989 . According to first party, this workman worked on work permits issued between 19-1-1987 to 24-01-1987 , from 26-07-1987 to 01-08-1987, from 21-9-1987 to 21-10-1987, from 16-11-1987to21-11-1987 , from 14-12-1987 to 19-12-1987, from 20-12-1987 to 26-12-1987 and from 25-01-1988 to 31-01-1988 and for 76days from April 1989 to June 1989 and not240 days in each calendar year to claim permanency. It is denied that he was acquitted because he was falsely involved in the case . Only because there was no evidence, he was acquitted Besides it is stated that, since he was casual labourer and did not work for more that 240 days in each calendar year, cannot claim permanency. Beside CCS Rules and CCA Rules does not permit second party to claim permanency. It is stated that Assistant Labour Commissioner ought not to have sent failure report and ought not to have considered the application of second party aftet 11 years when he was not regular worker and was not having good case to claim permanency . So it is submitted that, prayer prayedbe second party may be rejected .

8. In view of above pleadings , my Learned Predecessors framed issues at Ex- 16 which I answer as follows:

Issues

4485

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

with first partythereafter as and when work was available . He admits that, he produced last work permit for the period from 25-01-1988 to 30-01-1988 . He admits that, he was on duty on04-02-1990 . He admits that each work permittwas not more than 2 months at a time . He also states that , he is not sure whether he worked as a casual labourer . He admits that, in application dated 20-10-2000 he had taken contention that he was working as casual labourer : He admits that he was arrested by Police on 31-05-1989 and bailed out on 5-6-1989 . He admits that, he was attending casual work from 23-06-1989 . He admits that, he has no proof to show that, he worked for 240 days in each year from 1989 to 2000. He admits that he has no proof to show that, he approached Labour Commissioner for his continuous employment from 23-06-1989 to 02-03-2000 . He admits that, one Sharma was regular worker . He admits that, he was getting Rs . 500 to Rs . 600p.m. He admits that he was not having any evidence to show that he was getting Rs. 1,200 p.m. Then, he filed purshis (Ex-45) closing his evidence.Against that first party examined one Nirbhavane by filing affidavit at Ex- 46 . This witness does not know about work done by second party and he never worked at Byculla where second party worked. He stated in , his affidavit, on the basis of record maintained by first party . Then management closed evidence by filing purshis Ex - 50 .

11. Second party filed Written Arguments through advocate at Ex- 51 whereas first party filed at Ex-52: Both have made out their respective cases as stated above,

Findings

No.

(i) Whether Salvi proved that he completed 240 days continuous service in a year ?

Yes.

(ii) Whether the action of the management of MTNL, Mumbai by dismissing Sh.Arun Sahu Salvi from the services ofMTNL , Mumbai isjustified andproper?

Asper order below.

(iii) What relief the workman isentitled to?

REASONS

Issues Nos . 1 & 2:-

9. Second party claim that he became permanent employee by virtue of his service rendered for more than 240 days in each calendar year between 1980 to 1989 . Whereas case of first party is that second party was taken as casual labour on daily wages . He did not work for 240 days in each calendar year to claim permanency .

10. To prove that, second party rely on his evidence whichhe filed in the form ofaffidavit in lieu ofexamination- in- chief at Ex - 26 where he stated the entire above story. In the cross be admits that, he worked with first party from 1980 as per work permit . He admits that first work permit was from08-04-1980 to 31-12-1980. He admits that, he worked 12.As referred in the cross of the second partywhere he admits that he has no evidence to show that he worked for more than 240 days and was getting Rs . 1200 p.m. as stated in his claim statement . Even he admits that there was no work order every time which was for more than 2 months . If that is the case , by that he admits that, he never worked for more than 2 months at a stretch . In that scenario, question arises, how it can be said that, he worked for more that 240 days in each calendar year ? Under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, it requires continuous work of240 days in each calendar year. But here casemade out by first party that he did not work for more than 240 days which is not disputed by second party, does not permit second party to claim that, he passed that test and became eligible to claim permanency as well as protection under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act. 13. Documents were demanded by second party by application dated 20-11-2002. Said was replied by first party saying that, since documents demanded were of more than 10 years old and are not maintained by first party, they unable to produce it. Infact burden is on second partyto prove that, he worked for more than 240 days in each calendar year to claim permanency to get protection under provisions of Industrial Disputes Act . To support that nrst party place reliance on the copy of citation published in (2005 ) 8 SCC page 750. While deciding the case of Surendranagar District Panchayat V/ s . Dahyabhai 4486

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

Amarsingh Apex court observed that burden was on workmento show that he worked for more than 240 days in calendar year when he claim like that but in this case he has failed to discharge the burden . Then first party place reliance on copy of citation published in (2005) 5 SCC page 100 where Apex Court while deciding case of Manager Reserve Bank of India , Bangalore V/s . S. Mani and Ors observed like that.

14. Besides that first party attacked on the claim of the second party on laches saying reference is made after 11 years from the date of alleged termination . It is alleged that between those years , second party did not approach any authority to claim any reinstatement or employment. According to first party, when no reasonable explanation isgiven for such delay , second party cannot claim any relief and for that first party place reliance on citation published in 2001 ( I) Sec . 424. While deciding case of Indian Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. V/s . Prahlad Singh , Apex Court observed that, when no explanation is given for such delay, relief of such type cannot be considered . Even first party place reliance on copy of citation published in 2007 AIR SC3012in case of Dr. Arijit Pasayat and Lokeshwar Singh Panta V/ s . Gurmit Singh as well on copy of citation published in (2006) 6 SCC page 221 in case of Reserve Bank of India V/s . Gopinath Sharma and Another.

15. Besides first party object prayer of the second party saying that, simply because second party was acquitted bythe criminal court it does not mean that he was not guilty ofthe charges leveled against him . According to first party, second partywas arrested by police .He was in police custody and he was tried by the Metropolitan Magistrate .According to first party effect of acquittal in criminal proceedings for misconductlikegiving benefit of doubt , would not per se be binding upon the employer and does not automatically give the employee right to be reinstated as per , Citation published in(2005) 5 SCC page 100 in case ofManager Reserve Bank ofIndia V/s . S. Mani and Ors .

16. First party also place reliance on copy of citation published in (2004) 8 SCC page 246/249 in case ofM.P. ElectricityBoard V/s . Hariram where Apex Court observed thatdasual worker taken on project work for specific period and then not taken in the employment after project work is completed cannot claim any relief as work for which he was taken is completed .

17. So if we consider all these coupled with case made out by both , I am of the opinion that , second party has not completed 240 days . Besides this second party unable to prove that he is entitled to reinstatement . He has not pointed out as to why Sharma was taken in employment by doing discrimination and what discrimination is made against him. When all these things not clear here , in my considered view, second party is not entitled to any relief.

18. Inview of discussions made above , I am of the view that claim of second party needs to be rejected. Hence theorder:

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ]

ORDER

Reference is rejected .

Date: 13-06-2008

A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 14 जुलाई , 2008

का. आ. 2201. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर - संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 119/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[फा.सं. एल -40012/456/2000- आईआर( डी. यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 14th July, 2008 S.O. 2201.In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 119/2001 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court No. I , Chandigarh , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the imployers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 14-07-2008.

[ F.No. L-40012/456/2000- IR(DU ) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1,

CHANDIGARH Case No I. D. 119/2001

Sh . Ranjit Singh S/o Sh . Babu Singh , R/ o H.No. 1585 , Sec. 29 -B . Chd. 160001

....Applicant

Versus

.Respondent ThePrincipal General Manager , Telecom, Sector 18 , Chandigarh .

Appearances

Workmanwith Sh . O. P. Batra Sh . G. C. Babbar

For the workman: For the management :

AWARD

Passed on 4-7-2008

CentralGovt. vide notification No. L- 40012/456/2000- IR(D-U) dated01-02-2001 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Deptt. of Telecom . Chandigarh in terminating the services of

He [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Sh . Ranjit Singh S/o . Sh . Babu Singh w.e.f. 27-02-99 isjust and legal? Ifnot, to what reliefthe workman is entitled and from which date? " :

The present reference was made by the Central Government onthe failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication of the matter referred in the Schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the managerment as illegal and invalid and for reinstatement in service with full back wages and all consequential benefits in the interest ofjustice, equity and fair play..

The management turned up and opposes this reference.

As per office memorandum dated 30-4-08 , this case wasfixed in Pre lokAdalat meeting on 4-7-08 for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism . With the efforts of the Tribunal , the workman agreed to withdraw his reference . The management also agreed to providethework to the workman with the contractor as per the policy of the Government . The prescribed authority of the management and the workman during the hearing of this case in Pre Lok Adalat agreed upon the above mentioned terms and conditions . It is proposed to dispose ofthis reference in Lok Adalat . Accordingly, the reference is returned to the Central Government as settled in Lok Adalat. Central Government be informed. File be consigned.

Announced.

4-7-2008

G. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 14 जुलाई , 2008

का. आ. 2202.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार दूरसंचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. - 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 117/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/454/2000- आई.आर. ( डी. यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 14th July, 2008 S.O. 2202. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 117/ 2001 ) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. I , Chandigarh, as shown in the Annexure, inthe Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 14-07-2008 .

[No. L-40012/454/2000- IR(DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

4487

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 ,

CHANDIGARH

Case No I. D. 117/2001

Sh. Jagat Pal ,

S/o Sh . Bhagat Ram , R/o H. No. 224, Sector 30-A, Chandigarh- 16001

Applicant

Versus

Respondent The Principal General Manager , Telecom, Sector 18 , Chandigarh ..

APPEARANCES

Workmanwith Sh. O. P. Batra For the workman:

Sh . G. C. Babbar

For the management:

AWARD

Passed on 4-7-2008

Central Government vide notification No. L- 40012/ 454/2000 - IR (DU) dated 01-02-2001 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Deptt. of Telecom. Chandigarh in terminating the services of Sh..Jagat Pal S/O Sh . Bhagat Ram we.f. 27-02-99 is justand legal? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled? "

The present reférence was made by the Central Government on the failure ofconciliation proceedings for adjudication of the matter referred in the Schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid and for reinstatement in service with full backwages and all consequential benefits in the interest ofjustice , equity and fair play.

The management turned up and opposes this reference.

As per office memorandum dated 30-4-08, this case was fixed in pre Lok Adalat meeting on, 4-7-08 for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism . With the efforts ofthe Tribunal, the workman agreed to withdraw his reference . The management also agreed to provide the work to the workman with the contractor as per the policy of the Government . The prescribed authority of the management and the workman during the hearing of this case in pre Lok Adalat agreed upon the above mentioned terms and conditions . It is proposed to dispose of this reference in Lok Adaiat. Accordingly, the reference is returned to the Central Government, as settled in LokAdalat . CentralGovernment be informed . File be consigned to record.

Announced.

4-7-2008..

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer 4488

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II--SEC. 3 ( ii)] नई दिल्ली, 14 जुलाई , 2008

Amritsar in terminating the services of Shri Subhash Chander w.e.f. 12-7-90 , is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled and from what date ? "

का. आ. 2203.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल इंस्टिट्यूट, ऑफ प्लास्टिक्स इंजीनियरिंग एण्ड टेक्नोलोजी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. -1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 143/94 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

The present reference was made by the Central Government on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication of the matter referred in the Schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid and for reinstatement in service with full back wages and all consequential benefits .

[सं. एल-42012/57/1991-आई.आर. ( डी. यू. ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी

The management turned up and opposes this reference .

NewDelhi, the 14th July, 2008

S.O. 2203. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 143/ 94) ofCentral Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court No. I, Chandigarh , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to themanagement of Central Institute ofPlastics Engineering and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 14-07-2008 .

[No. L-42012/57/ 1991 - IR( DU) ]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

Asper office memorandum dated 30-4-08 , this case was fixed in pre Lok Adalat meeting on 4-7-08 for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism . With the efforts of the Tribunal , the workman agreed to withdraw his reference. The management also agreed to provide the work to the workman with the contractor as per the policy of the Government . The prescribed authority of the management and the workman during the hearing of this case in pre Lok Adalat agreed upon the above mentioned terms and conditions . It is proposed to dispose of this reference in Lok Adalat . Accordingly, the reference is returned to the Central Government as settled in Lok Adalat . Central Government be informed. File be consigned to record.

Announced

4-7-2008

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA , PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNEMNT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 ,

CHANDIGARH

GK. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 14 जुलाई , 2008

Case No I. D. 143/1994

Sh . Subhash Chander ,

C/oBhartya Mazdoor Sangh , Putlighar, Street No. 2Amritsar (Punjab) Applicant

Versus

Senior Manager ( Project) ,

का. आ. 2204, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल इंस्टिट्यूट , ऑफ प्लास्टिकस इंजीनियरिंग एण्ड टेक्नोलोजी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं.- 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदर्भ सं. 145/94 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Central Institute of Plastics Engineering and Technology ,Polytechnic Road , PostRoyan and Silk Mill ,

Respondent

Amritsar - 143104 (Punjab)

[फा.सं. एल -42012/63/1991- आई.आर. ( डी. यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी APPEARANCES

New Delhi , the 14th July, 2008

Forthe workman:

Sh. S.K. Gupta

Sh . B: S . Bhatia with

For the management:

Shri K.S.Sodhi

AWARD

Passed on 4-7-2008

S.O. 2204.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 145 / 94) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court No. I , Chandigarh , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Institute of Plastics Engineering and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 14-07-2008 .

CentralGovernment vide notification No. L- 42012/ 57/91- IR (DU), dated 1-11-94, has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether action of Senior Manager ( Project) , Central Institute of Plastics Engineering and Technology,

[ F. No. L-42012/ 63 / 1991-1R( DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT-1, CHANDIGARH

Case No I. D. 145/1994

Sh.MadanGopal

Applicant C/o Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh , Putlighar, Street No.2, Amritsar (Punjab)-143104

Versus

Respondent Senior Manager( Project) , Central Institute of Plastics Engineering and Technology, Polytechnic Road, PostRoyan and Silk Mill , Amritsar-143104(Punjab)

APPEARANCES

Forthe workman:

Workman inperson with S. K. Gupta , Advocate For the management: Sh . B.S. Bhatia with Shri K.S.Sodhi

AWARD

Passed on 4-7-2008

Central Govt . vide notification No. L-42012/63/91- IR(DU), dated 1-11-94, has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of Senior Manager ( Project), Central Institute of Plastics and Technology, Amritsar in terminating the services of Shri Madan Gopal we.f. 19-7-90. is legal andjustified? If not to what relief the concerned workman is entitled and from what date " ?..

The present reference was made by the CentralGovt. onthe failure ofconciliation proceedings for adjudication ofthe matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid and for reinstatement in service with full back wages and all consequential benefits in the interest ofjustice , equity and fair play.

The management turned up and opposes this reference.

As per office memorandum dated 30-4-08 , this case was fixed in pre Lok Adalat meeting on 4-7-08 for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism. With the efforts of the Tribunal , the workman agreed to withdraw his reference . The management also agreed to provide the work to the workman with the contractor as per the policy of the Government . The prescribed authority ofthe management and the workman during the hearing of this case in pre Lok Adalat agreed upon the above mentioned terms and conditions . It is proposed to dispose of this reference in Lok Adalat .

14489

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930 .

Accordingly, the reference is returned to the Central Government as settled in Lok Adalit . Central Government be informed. File be consigned to record.

Announced

4-7-2008

GK . SHARMA , Presiding Officer

!

नई दिल्ली, 14 जुलाई , 2008

का. आ. 2205.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947, ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीचं अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 197/89 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[फा.सं. एल -12011 /2 / 1989 - आई.आर. (डी-2 ( ए ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी 1 New Delhi , the 14th July, 2008 S.O. 2205. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 17/89) ofCentral Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court No. I, Chandigarh , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the manage- ment of Central Bank of India and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 14-07-2008.

[F.No. L- 12011 /2/1989-(D-2A) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1, CHANDIGARH

Case No I. D. 197/1989

VicePresident,

Central Bank of India Employees Union , 123 , Afgan Street, Jammu. ...Applicant

Versus

Regional Manager,

Regional Oflicer, Central Bank of India, Eqmas Road, Amritsar ...Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the workman:

Shri B.S. Gilt Shri C.R. Verma For the management:

AWARD

Passed on : 30-6-2008

Government of India vide notification No. 120 11/2/ 89 -D- 2 (A) , dated 10th November , 1989 referred this industrial dispute for judicial adjudication of this Tribunal . The reference is referred as :-

4490

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

(I) that Bishnah is within 8 kms . from the line of actual control , or

" Whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India in denying the payment of special border area allowance to workmen in Bishnah branch is justified ? If not, to what relief are the concerned workmen entitled ? "

( II ) that Bishnah had been declared as a qualified place for border area allowance from time to time by the State Government .

After receiving this reference , the workmen filed the statement for claim by alleging that Bishnah falls within the distance of 8 kms . from the actual line of control and thus, the special area allowance ( border allowance) is payabletothe workmen of the bank in terms of the Bipartite Settlement dated 8-9-93 .

The management denied and stated that the workmen are not entitled for the special area allowance in terms of theBipartite Settlement dated 8-09-93 .

During the arguments . the management showed a document to the Tribunal though copy of the document wasnot filed thereafter , that the aerial distance of the Bishnah from the actual line of control is less than 8 kms . On the basis ofthat document which was a certificate given by Tehsildar concerned, this Tribunal passed a detailed order dated 13-6- 2008 giving one more opportunity to the workmen to produce the certificate of District Administration regarding the distance ofBishnah from line of actual control . Thcreafter , on 30-6-08 . the copy of the certificate was filed by the management which shows that the distance from Bishnah to Indo-Pak International Border is 25 kms. The original copy ofthe certificate given by Tehsildar Bishnah has been filed.

This was the very simple reference for the judicial adjudication which was referred on failure of conciliation proceedings before the Conciliation Officer. This Tribunal has to adjudicate whether the workmen posted in Bishnah branch are entitled for the special area allowance as per the Bipartite Settlement.

Both of the parties were also afforded the opportunity for filing the Afflidavits . Their Affidavits are on record . Bothof the parties also filed certain documents which are also on record . I have heard learned counsels for the parties and perused all the evidence including documentary evidence on record .

Management has filed certain documents along with the Affidavits of Shri . L.S. Gupta, the then Regional Manager , Central Bank of India, Amritsar . There is letter dated 12-4-99 issued by the office of Deputy Commissioner Jammu to the Manager , Central Bank of India regarding border area allowance . In this letter , Additional Deputy Commissioner , Jammu has intimated the Manager , Central Bank of India, Bishnah that Bishnah town has not been included/declared qualifying for border area allowance by the State Government .

Thus , the workmen , as per Clause 7 Schedule III to the Bipartite Settlement dated 8-9-93 has not proved any of the criteria as mentioned above , The distance of Bishnah from actual line of control ( no doubt it has been mentioned as International Border) is 25 kms . As per the letter of Deputy Commissioner Jammu , the State Government has not declared Bishnah as a qualifying place for border area allowance.

On 20-11-01 this reference was dismissed by this Tribunal because no one was present on behalf of the workmen . This order was published in the Central GovernmentGazette on 07-01-02 . Thereafter, workmen moved an application to the Central Government and the Central Government was kind enough to request this Tribunal once again to decide the reference in question afresh after affording the opportunity of being heard. From the order dated 8-12-04, it is clear that this Tribunal issued the notice upon both of the parties to adjudicate the reference afresh after affording the opportunity of being heard .

It is admitted to both of the parties that this special area allowance is to be given to the workmen as per the terms ofBipartite Statement dated 8-9-93 . It is also admitted that this allowance is to be given as per Schedule III of the Bipartite Settlement.

Onbehalf of the workmen , it has also been argued that Jammu and Kashmir Bank of Bhisnah branch is paying the border area allowance to the staff posted at Bishnah branch. The management has provided a copy of the letter dated24-6-08 referred to the Branch Manager , Central Bank of India, Bishnah ( Jammu) by J & K regarding payment of border area allowance to its staff, In its letter the Head of the Bishnah branch of Jammu and Kashmir Bank , it has been stated that J & K Bank is not paying any border area allowance to staff working in Bishnah branch. Accordingly, there is no force in the reference because the workmen have not proved that they are entitled for border area allowance on any of the criteria mentioned in Clause 7 of Schedule III to the Bipartite Settlement arrived at on 8-9-93 . Accordingly, the reference is answered in positive that the action of the management of Central Bank of India in denying the payment of special border area allowance to workmen in Bishnah is justified. Central Government be informed . File be consigned .

I have gone through the relevant Schedule III of the Bipartite Settlement dated 8-9-93 . Clause 7 of this Schedule envisages that the workmen of area which is not included inClause 126 but which are within a distance of 8 kms . from the line ofactual control or is a place declared as qualifying for border area allowance from time to time by the State Government for their own staff are entitled for the special area allowance . Admittedly, the case of workmen falls in Clause 7 of Schedule III to the Bipartite Settlement . For getting the border area allowance , the Union of the workmen was subjected to prove any one of the following two criteria:-

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नईदिल्ली, 14 जुलाई , 2008

का. आ. 2206.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार लाइफ इंश्योरेन्स कोपर्पोरेशन आफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , पूणे के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 271/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[फा.सं. एल-17012/33/1997- आई.आर. (बी- II ) ]

4491

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18, 1930

Second partyjoined the services of the first party as a clerk since 18-04-1958. He has served with the first party formore than40 years . His past service record is clean and unblemished.

3. It is contended that his services were terminated on 17-03-93 by the first party without sufficient cause and conducted the enquiry on 11-9-92 and 8-2-92 by enquiry officer Shri . Kulkarni . Prior to that charge sheet Dated 21st May , 1992 was given to the second party alleging misconduct ofthreatening to Smt. L.A Pradhan, ABM(A) . Second party replied the charge sheet by not admitting the charge.

राजिन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi, the 14th July, 2008 S.O. 2206. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947( 14 of.1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 271 / 1998) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Pune, as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India, and their workmen , receivedby the Central Government on 10-07-2008 .

4.It is contended that enquiry officer has obtained the statements ofShri Bhoier , Shri. Randive, Shri . Deo and Smt. Pradhan and not asked second party whether he desires togiven any representative to conduct the enquiry . The second therefore, enquiry conducted is against the principles ofnatural justice.

[F.No. L- 17012/33/1997-IR(B- II)]

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRLV. M. KAKADE, PRESIDING OFFICER, SECOND LABOUR COURT, PUNE REF. (IDA) NO . 271 OF 1998

.FirstParty BETWEEN Life Insurance Corporation of India, University Road, Pune-5 .

And Shri Pralhad M. Gaikwad, Aundh, Patil Wadi, Railway Police Vasahat, Khadki , Pune-3 .

.SecondParty Coram: Shri V. M. Kakade .

i

APPEARANCES : Shri , Pradhan, Advocate for 1st Party.

5. It is contended that findings of the enquiry officer were submitted the second party . In the enquiry, Smt. Pradhan was examined as a witness and witnesses who have been examined in the enquiry could not properly submit the narrations of Smt . Pradhan and second party. Thewitesses only deposed that there was a quarrel between second party and Smt . Pradhan, It is contended that though Smt. Pradhan was quarrelling with second party, she was not given any memo or charge sheet .

6. It is contended that in the enquiry, it is also mentioned that second party was in drunken state, but there is no medical evidence to support this allegation. Thus , enquiry conducted against second party is not fair and proper and against the principles ofnatural justice.

Shri . Mahadik, Advocate for 2nd Party

PART- I -AWARD Date: 26-2-2008

1.On alleged termination of services, second party approached to the Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation) Pune and on failure of conciliation , Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Pune preferred this reference under Sec.10 (2 ) & Sec.12 (5 ) of Industtial Disputes Act, 1947 ( hereinafter referred to as the Act , 1947) for adjudication in the matter of reinstatement with continuity of service and full back wages of second party.

2. Brief facts which are relevant for deciding present reference in Statement of Claim of second party at Exh.11 are as under :-

2823 G1/08-19

7. This reference is strongly resisted by the first party by filing its Written Statement at Exh. 17, wherein first party admitting status and length of service of the second patty, it is contended that the proceeding dtd . 12-08-92 clearly shows that the enquiry officer has specifically asked the second party as to whether he was in need of any assistance to represent the enquiry. The second party replied in negative . Therefore , the allegations made by the second party are without any substance and without any footing.

8. It is contended that all principles ofnatural justice were observed during the course of the enquiry. The enquiry officer has given his findings on the basis of evidence which was adduced before him by the parties . The disciplinary authority independently applied its mind on the enquiry proceedings and concurred with the findings of the enquiry officer . The punishing authority has also considered that the past record of the second party. The disciplinary authority had no alternative than totaken the action ofremoval as there was no improvement in spite of various punishments and various caution letters given to the second party . Finally it is prayed to reject the reference .

4492

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

party did not object for the recording in English. Second party was given translated version of enquiry proceedings .

9. Inview ofpleading of the parties issues have been frarned at Exh . 53 and in view of pursis at Exh . 52 , issue no . 1 is treated as a preliminary issue . Hence , following preliminary issue.

16. In support of first party has filed original proceedings before me .

Preliminary Issue.

Findings.

...Yes.

1. Does the second party prove that enquiry con- ducted against him is not fair, proper and against the principles ofnaturaljustice ?

2. What order?

As per final order .

10. Second party in support of his contentions examined himselfat Exh.32 and closed evidence by filing pursis at Exh .44. On the other hand, first party filed affidavit in lieu of examination in chief of Shri . Sham Kulkarni at Exh 47 and closed evidence by filing pursis at Exh.47(A) .

17. With this evidence , Ld . Advocate for the second party relied upon the cross examination of the enquiry officer has submitted that this enquiry was allotted to the enquiryofficer to the fag end of his services i . e . 2 years of his retirement . Enquiry officer admitted that this was his first enquiry conducted by him. Not only this enquiry officer in his cross examination without leaving any ambiguity admitted that he does not know the detail procedure of the enquiry. With this it is submitted that admittedly, enquiry is conducted such an enquiry officer who does not know the detail procedure of the enquiry then how it is to be accept that he would have followed every procedural aspect cautiously.

11. With this evidence before me I have discussed my reasons for findings as under :

REASONS

12. ISSUE No. 1 :-Before proceeding reasons in details . I would like to mention that at this stage , I am dealing with issue of fairness of enquiry. Therefore, I have picked up relevant evidence only of the parties for discussion.

18. Further relying on the cross examination of the enquiry officer , it is submitted that admittedly there was management representative to conduct the enquiry and enquiry officer himself represented as management representative and recorded evidence of the witnesses . Though enquiry officer has stated on oath that he had given opportunity to appoint the defense representative, there is no evidence on record to show that even such opportunity was given to the second party by the enquiry officer. First time , enquiry officer stated before the Court that he had given opportunity to the second party to appoint defense representative . Enquiry officer never explained enquiry procedure to the second party and also not asked to the second party whether he was willing to appoint defense representative . Because of such conduct of the enquiry officer all the witnesses examined by the management remained uncrossed and opportunity to defend the charges was deprived to the second party.

13. Second party in his affidavit in lieu of examination inchiefhas stated on oath that in the year 1992 , first party issued charge sheet and initiated enquiry against him . Shri C.V. Kulkarni was enquiry officer . Enquiry was conducted inthe chamber of branch manager of Khadki He has further stated on oath that Shri. Sunil Nikalje, union representative has told him that dispute will be settled hence had not appointed defense representative. Enquiry against him was conducted in two sittings only . Proceeding was not explained to him in Marathi . His signature was not obtained on Marathi translation .

19. It is admitted by the enquiry officer that second party was not acquainted with English even then enquiry proceedings was recorded in English and its translated copy is given at the end of the enquiry . As such enquiry officer has not followed principles of natural justice and denied opportunity to the second party to defend the charges . On this ground alone , enquiry is liable to be vitiated.

14. On the other hand, enquiry officer Shri Kulkarni inhis affidavit in lieu of examination in chief has stated on oath that he was working with the first party for about 38 years He was appointed as an enquiry officer to conduct the enquiry in respect of second party on 21-05-92. The second partydid not appear in the enquiry alone . Second party did not take any of his representative for his defense inspite ofrepeatedly asked by him.

20. Ld. Advocate for the first party in his argument at Exh.48 has submitted that admittedly charge sheet dtd. 21-05-92 was given to the second party . Second party participated in the enquiry proceedings . Though opportunity was given , second party did not appoint any defense representative to defend him in the enquiry . Relying on cross examination of the second party, it is submitted that one Shri . Suni ! Nikalje told him not to appoint any defense representative as matter will be settled afterward . It shows that opportunity was given to second party to appoint defense representative , but he did not avail remedy nor examined Shri . Sunil Nikalje.

15. It is further stated on oath that before starting enquiry, he explained the procedure of the domestic enquiry to the management as well as the delinquent verbally . It is not his practice to record the procedure again in writing unless it is objected by a party. Second party was well aware the procedure of the enquiry as he was charge sheeted 6-7 times earlier and under gone the departmental enquiry. During the course of enquiry second party did gave opportunity to cross examine the witnesses of the manageinent and to examine its own witnesses, however , second party did not avail the same. All the recordings of the enquiry proceeding were provided to the second party. InLICall corespondence is done in English only. Second 4493 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930-

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

it appears that except bear words of the enquiry officer , there is no place of preliminary enquiry conducted by the enquiryofficer.

21. Relying on enquiry proceeding on record, it is submitted that enquiry procedure was explained to the second party. Day to day proceeding was recorded in presence of second party and he signed for the same. Not only this , but first party has also provided copy of proceeding translated into Marathi to the second party.

22. Support of the contentions , first party has examined enquiry officer Shri. S.V. Kulkarni , he has stated on oath that he had explained enquiry proceeding orally to the second party. Second party told him that he was well acquainted with the procedure of the enquiry. Not only this but like defense representative , management representative was also not there, Therefore , enquiry will notvitiate.

26. On perusal ofthe enquiry proceedings , it appears that enquiry officer had directly jumped to record the statements of the witnesses that too without management representative. Enquiry Officer himself chosen witnesses ofthe management and record, there statements in English . Though second party was not acquainted with the English, principles of natural justice requires that at the beginning of the enquiry proceeding enquiry officer should explained procedure ofthe enquiry to the delinquent . In clear words enquiry officer should ask delinquent whether he understood the charges levelled against him and whether delinquent is willing to appoint defense representative and ifwilling then enquiry officer should give opportunity to the delinquent to appoint defense representative ofhis choice and then to proceed with the second party of the enquiry.

23. It is submitted that it is the duty of the second party to show what prejudice caused to him because of unfairness of the enquiry, but second party has not shown at anytime prejudice caused tohim. Therefore, enquirywill not vitiate on that ground . Though , opportunity was given to the second party to appoint defense representative, he did not avail the same remedy and thoroby did not avail remedy of cross- examination of the witnesses of the management . Though opportunity was given to lead evidence, second party declined to lead evidence . It is submitted that fair and proper opportunity was given to the second party. Therefore , enquiry was conducted by following principles of naturaljustice.

27. As stated earlier , there is no evidence on record to show that such preliminary enquiry was conducted by the enquiry officer . It appears that at the first time before the Court, enquiry officer has stated that enquiry proçedure was explained and delinquent was asked whether he is willing to appoint defense representative. In brief, fair and proper opportunity was not given to the second party to appoint defense representative of his choice because of which secondparty did not cross examine witnesses ofthe management whose statement were recorded in English by enquiry officer though second party was not acquainted with English language .

1. It is the case ofthe first party that translated copies inMarathi ofthe proceedings were provided to the second party. Surprisingly on perusal of the enquiry proceedings, it appears that either enquiry officer or management has given translated copies to the second party after conclusion of the enquiry proceedings which is ofno use ofthe second party to defend the charges.

24. On perusal of oral as well as documentary evidence on record in the light of submissions of both the Ld . advocates , it appears that admittedly charge sheet dtd. 21-5-92 was issued to the second party and enquiry was initiated against second party by appointing enquiry officer Shri . S.V. Kulkarni , According to second party , fair and proper opportunity was not given to him and thereby enquiry officer deprived his right to defend the enquiry. Hence. enquiry is liable to be vitiated, On the other hand, first party is with the ease that fair and proper opportunity was given to the second party, Enquiry officer conducted enquiryby following principles of naturaljustice.

25. Both the Ld. Advocates have placed their oral as well as documentary evidence on record. Let us scrutinize oral evidence of both the parties cautiously . Keeping in mind enquiry proceeding on record, at the very beginning, one cannot ignore admissions given by the enquiry officer in his cross examination . Enquiry Officer Shri .Kulkarni in his cross examination without leaving any ambiguity has admitted that it was his first enquiry and he had no experience of conducting enquiry. Not only this , but further he admitted that he does not know detail procedure of the enquiry . Then as submitted by the Ld.' Advocate for the second party how one can expect that enquiry officer should have followed proper procedure of the enquiry. Knowledge of the enquiry officer about enquiry procedure is also reflected in the enquiry proceedings. On perusai of the entire enquiry proceeding ,

2.On perusal of the proceedings , it appears that on concluding enquiry proceeding , enquiry officer submitted his report and findings to the first party, surprisingly, without supplying copy of the report and findings of the enquiry officer , first party issued show cause notice of dismissal to the second party . Here also , first party opportunity even to see report and findings of the enquiry officer so to explain show cause notice issued by the first party.Again opportunity to say on report and findings of the enquiry officer was not given to the second party. Admittedly, all witnesses are examined and enquiry proceedings is recorded in English before second party and enquiry officer at the end of statement of each witnesses just asked second party what he wants to say about this . As the second party was not acquainted with the English naturally he has to keep mum and he did it only. This opportunity to cross- examination witnesseswas denied to the second party .

4494

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

3. Considering the entire evidence on record and the procedure followed by the enquiry officer , it appears to be against the principles of natural justice and without giving proper and fair opportunity of being heard to the second party. Hence, liable to be vitiated. However as asserted by the first party in its written statement still opportunity is with the first party to prove the misconduct before the Court. First party is at liberty to avail such remedy . Hence , Ianswer the issue in the affirmative . In the result, I pass followingOrder.

ORDER

Enquiry conducted against the second party is not fair, proper and against the principles of natural justice and accordingly enquiry stands vitiated .

2.First party iswith at liberty to prove the misconduct against the second party before the Court.

3. In the circumstances , there is no order as to costs .

Place: Pune.

Date:26-2-2008

V. M. KAKADE , Presiding Officer नईदिल्ली, 14 जुलाई , 2008

का. आ. 2207.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार इन्स्टीट्यूट आफ माइक्रोबियल टेक्नोलोजी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं. - 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 23/2002) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-7-2008 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/ 65 /2001-आई.आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi, the 14th July, 2008 S.O. 2207. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 23/ 2002) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. I,I, Chandigarh , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the management of Institute of Microbial Technology and their workmen , receivedby the Central Government on 14-7-2008.

[No. L-42012/65/2001 - IR(CM- II) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 ,

CHANDIGARH

Case No I. D. 23/2002

Sh. Angrej Singh,

S/o Sh . Pal Singh R/o Village, Radyala,

.......Applicant TehKharar, Ropar

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Versus

TheDirector,

Institute ofMicrobial Technology

...... Respondent

Sector 39-A, Chandigarh - 160001

APPEARANCES

For the workman:

Workman in person

Forthe management: Sh . I.S. Sidhu along with S.K Sadana

AWARD

Passed on 4-7-2008

Central Govt. vide notification No.L-42012/ 65 /2001- IR( CM - II) dated 8-1-2002 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Institute ofMicrobial Technology, Chandigarh in terminating the services of Sh . Angrej Singh S/ o Sh . Pal Singh w.e.f. 18-5-99 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

Thepresent reference was made by the Central Govt . onthe failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication of the matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid and for reinstatement in service with full backwages and all consequential benefits in the interest ofjustice, equity and fair play.

The management turned up and opposes this reference .

As per office memorandum dated 30-4-2008 , this case was fixed in pre Lok Adalat meeting on 4-7-2008 for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation techanism . With the efforts of the Tribunal, the workman agreed to withdraw his reference . The management also agreed to provide the work to the workman with the contractor as per the policy of the Govt . The prescribed authority of the management and the workman during the hearing ofthis case in pre lok adalat agreed upon the above mentioned terms and conditions . It is proposed to dispose offthis reference in Lok Adalat . Accordingly the reference is returned to the Central Govt . as settled in Lok Adalat . Central Govt . be informed. File be consigned to record.

Announced 4-7-2008

G.K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 14 जुलाई , 2008

का. आ. 2208.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार इन्स्टीट्यूट आफ माइक्रोबियल टेक्नोलोजी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदर्भ सं. 21/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -42012/64/2001- आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

+ 4495

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9, 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

NewDelhi , the 14th July, 2008

agreed to provide the work to the workman with the contractor as per the policy of the Government the prescribed authority of the management and the workman during the hearing of this case in pre Lok Adalat agreed upon the above Mentioned terms and conditions. It is proposed to dispose of this reference in Lok Adalat . Accordingly the reference is returned to the Central Government as settled in Lok Adalat Central Government be informed. File be consigned to record.

S.O. 2208. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 21/ 2002) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the management of Institute ofMicrobial Technology and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 14-7-2008.

Announced 4-7-2008

[No. L-42012/64/2001 - IR(CM- II)]

GK . SHARMA , Presiding Officer SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer

नई दिल्ली , 14 जुलाई , 2008

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT-1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. I. D. 21/2002

Sh. Sant Ram

S/oGhasiya Lal,

का. आ. 2209,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार इन्स्टीट्यूट आफ माइक्रोबियल टेक्नोलोजी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 35/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

H. No. 2572, Sector 37 -C,

Applicant

Chandigarh

[सं/एल -42012/69/2001- आईआर (सीएम-11 ) ] Versus

स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी TheDirector,

Institute ofMicrobial Technology

New Delhi , the 14th July, 2008

Respondent

Sector 39-A, Chandigarh- 160001

APPEARANCES

Forthe workman:

Workmaninperson

For the management : Sh. I.S. Sidhu alongwith S.K Sadana

AWARD

Passed on 4-7-2008

S.O. 2209. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 35/ 2002) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the manage- ment of Institute of Microbial Technology and their workmen, received bythe Central Government on 14-7-2008.

[No. L-42012/69 /2001 - IR(CM - II ) ]

SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer CentralGovt. vide notification No. L-42012/64/2001- IR(CM- II) dated 08-1-2002 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

ANNEXURE

"Whether the action of the management of Institute ofMicrobial Technology , Chandigarh in terminating the services of Sh. Sant Ram S/o Sh . Ghasiya Lal w.e.f. 18-5-99 is legal and justified ? If not, to what reliefthe workman is entitled to? "

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

CaseNo. I. D. 35/2002

Sh. Trish Pal

S/o Sh. Mittan Lal

H.No. 4406, Maloya Colony,

Applicant

Chandigarh. -160017

Versus

The present reference was made by the Central Government on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication ofthe matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid and for reinstatement in servicewith full backwages and all consequential benefits inthe interest ofjustice , equity and fair play..

TheDirector,

The management turned up and opposes this reference.

Respondent

Institute of Microbial Technology Sector 39 -A, Chandigarh- 160001

APPEARANCES

i

Forthe workman:

Workman in person

Sh . 1. S. Sidhu along with

Forthe management:

Asper office memorandum dated 30-4-08 , this case was fixed in pre Lok Adalat meeting on 4-7-08 for its disposal by adopting the medfation and conciliation mechanism . With the efforts of the Tribunal , the workman agreed to withdraw his reference. The management also

S:K. Sadana.

4496

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii)] AWARD

Passed on 4-7-2008

Industrial dispute between the management of Institute ofMicrobial Technology and their workmen , receivedby the Central Government on 14-7-2008 .

Central Government vide notification No.L -42012/69/ 2001 - IR(CM- II )dated 30-1-2002 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

[No. L-42012/82/2001 - IR(CM - II)] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

"Whether the action of the management of Institute ofMicrobial Technology, Chandigarh in terminating the services ofSh . Trish Pal S/o Sh . Mittan Lal w.e.f. 18-5-99 is legal and justified? Ifnot, to what reliefthe workman is entitled to?"

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH Case No. I. D. 5/2002

Sh . Ravi Kumar, S/o Sh . Dhogru Ram, H.No. 4569 , Maloya Colony, Chandigarh .

Applicant

Thepresent reference was madeby the Central Govt . onthe failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication ofthe matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management asillegal and invalid and for reinstatement in service with full backwages and all consequential benefits inthe interest ofjustice , equity and fair play.

Versus

TheDirector

The management turned up and opposes this reference.

Institute of Microbial Technology Sector 39-A,

Respondent

Chandigarh -160001

APPEARANCES

Forthe workman: Workman in person

For the management : Sh . I. S. Sidhu along with S. K. Sadana

AWARD

Passed on 4-7-08

Central Government vide notification No. L -42012/ 82/2001-1R ( CM - 11) dated 27-12-2001 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

As peroffice memorandum dated 30-4-08 , this case was fixed in pre Lok Adalat meeting an 4-7-08 for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism. With the efforts of the Tribunal, the workman agreed to withdraw his reference . The management also agreed to provide the work to the workman with the contractor as per the policy of the Government the prescribed authority of the management and the workman during the hearing of this case in pre Lok Adalat agreed uponthe above mentioned terms and conditions . It is proposed to dispose of this reference in Lok Adalat . Accordingly the reference is returned to the Central Government as settled in Lok Adalat . Central Government be informed. File be consigned to record .

Announced

4-7-2008

"Whether the action of the management of Institute ofMicrobial Technology, Chandigarh in terminating the services of Sh . Ravi Kumar S/o Sh . Dhogru Ram w.e.f. 18-5-99 is legal and justified? If not , to what relief he is entitled to ?"

GK . SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 14 जुलाई , 2008

Thepresent reference was made by the Central Govt . on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication ofthe matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid and for reinstatement in service with full backwages and all consequential benefits in the interest ofjustice , equity and fair play.

का. आ. 2210. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 11 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार इन्स्टीट्यूट आफ माइक्रोबियल टेक्नोलोजी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं.1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 5/2002) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

The management turned up and opposes this reference.

[से. एल-42012/82/2001- आईआर( सीएम- II ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 14th July, 2008

S.O. 2210.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Govemment hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 5/2002) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court No. 1, Chandigarh , as shown in the Annexure , in the

Asper office memorandum dated 30-4-08, this case was fixed in pre Lok Adalat meeting on 4-7-08 for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism . With the efforts ofthe Tribunal , the workman agreed to withdraw his reference . The management also agreed to provide the work to the workman with the contractor as per the policy of the govt . The prescribed authority of the management and the workman during the hearing of this case in pre Lok Adalat agreed upon the

1 4497

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/श्रावण 18 , 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

above mentioned terms and conditions . It is proposed to dispose off this reference in LokAdalat. Accordingly the reference is returned to the Central Government as settled in Lok Adalat Central Government be informed. File be consigned to record.

Announced

4-7-2008

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 15 जुलाई, 2008

2.The case as set up by the workman in his claim statement is that that he was a confirmed regular employee with clean record of services but on account of his trade union activities he was victimized by the opposite party being suddenlydischarged from service under regulation ofthe Staff Regulations , 1971 ofthe Food Corporation of India with maliciously and with ulterior motive . It is also alleged that several junior to him continued in service . As the entire action ofthe opposite party is against principles ofnatural justice and against Regulations , the workman has prayed that the dismissal order dated 30-04-74be set aside and he be reinstated in the service of the opposite partywith full back wages , continuity of service and all consequential benefits.

का. आ. 2211.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एफ सी आई के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 142/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[फा.सं. एल-22012/220/1997- आई.आर. ( सीएम- II ) ]

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 15th July, 2008

S.O. 2211. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 142/ 1998) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court Kanpur , as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Food Corporation. of India and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 15-7-2008 .

!

[F.No. L-22012/220/1997-IR( CM- II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

3.As against the claim of the workman the opposite party management has filed their reply interalia alleging therein that the claim ofthe claimant is highly misconceived andnotmaintainable as no provision of law has been cited under which, it has been moved. The claimant is a dismissed employee and his dismissal has not been set aside by any court. Even the Hon'ble High Court has recorded its order and the reference by the State of U.P. treating as an Industrial dispute has been set aside and fresh reference hasbeen made by the Central Government. The claiment is not entitled to any relief. According to the order passed by thePresidingOfficer ofLabour Court Agra the management ofFoodCorporation ofIndia has to recover a huge amount of salary already paid to him from 1974 to 1992, as the claimant was dismissed in 1974, hence question ofmaking payment ofsalary any more does not arise . The claimant has not worked at all since 1974 till date , hence on the basis principles of no work no pay, the claimant is not entitled for any salary and lastly it has been prayed that he application ofthe claimant be rejected.

ANNEXURE

4.The claimant has filed rejoinder against thereply filed by the opposite party but therein nothing new has been averred except reiterating the facts already pleaded byhim inhis statement of claim.

BEFORE SHRI RGSHUKLA PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, KANPUR

Industrial Dispute No 142 of 1998

Between

5.After exchange of pleadings between the parties whereas apart from adducing oral evidence, the workman has also filed certain documentary evidence in support of hisclaim.

Ram Prakash Pathak VillageNaglaDevjit PO Yamuna Bridge NearWest Rly Hospital , Agra And

DistrictManager

Food Corporation of India, 2/63 Ram Nagar Colony,Agra .

AWARD

1. Central Government , MOL , New Delhi , vide its notification no.L- 22012/220/97 /IR (CM-II) dated 27-07-98, has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal :

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in terminating the services of Sri Ram Prakash Pathak Chowkidar with effect from 30-04-74 is legal and justified? Ifnot, towhat reliefis the workman entitled ?"

6. It may be pointed out that from the order sheet it is quite evident that the evidence of the workman concluded on08-05-02 , thereafter the case was posted for the evidence ofthe management on 07-08-02 . The tribunal remained in abeyance for want of assumption of charge by new PresidingOfficer and after the charge of Presiding Officer was resumed notices were issued to the parties fixing 19-06-03 for evidence ofthe management. On 24-07-03 , the management instead of adducing evidence in support of theirclaim preferred tomove an application for adjournment on the ground that since the District Manager has recently taken over the charge therefore he could not prepare the case which relate to 1998. On this application it was observed by the tribunal that the ground itself speaks that the management is neither serious nor is willing to adduce evidence and the management therefore is debarred from adducing evidence . Thereafter , repeated applications from the side of the management were moved for recalling the 4498

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVAΝΑ 18, 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 15th July, 2008 order dated 24-07-03 by which the management was debarred from adducing evidence but all such applications were rejected by the tribunal treating grounds as insufficient . Thereafter final arguments in the case were heard.

S.O. 2212. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 86/ 2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court Chennai , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the management of Handicrafts &Handlooms Export Corp. of India Ltd. and their workmen, receivedby the Central Government on 15-7-2008.

[F.No. L-42012/ 149 /2005 - IR(CM - II )] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

7. Therefore from the above it is quite evident that it is a case where management has palpably failed to adduce oral or documentary evidence in support of its claim despite availing of opportunities granted by the tribunal . The evidence oral as well as documentary led by the workman remains uncontroverted. The workman has substantiated his claim by his evidence . Therefore, the tribunal has no hesitation in believing the case of the workman and the tribunal is of the conclusive opinion that the management hasremoved the services ofthe workman in gross violation ofrules of natural justice and rules governing the service conditions applicable to the workman.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT Friday, the 25th April , 2008 Present: K..Jayaraman, Presiding Officer

Industrial Dispute No. 86/2006

[In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofsub-section (I ) and sub-section 2(A) ofSection 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 194.7( 14 of 1947), between the Management of Handicrafts & Handloom Export Corporation of India Ltd. and their workman] BETWEEN

Sri G. Chandrasekhar

:1stParty/Petitioner

AND

The General Manager

Handicraft and Handlooms Export

Corporation of India Ltd. ,

143 , Greams Road

Thousand Lights

Chennai -60006

:2nd Party/Management

APPEARANCE :

8. From the facts and circumstances stated above , it is quite evident that the workman had received certain amountby way of salary under the orders of the Hon'ble High Court , Allahabad, in pursuance ofaward rendered by the Labour Court U.P. Agra, reinstating the workman in the services ofthe opposite party . But subsequently the writ petition filed bythe workman was dismissed by the Hon'ble High Court with liberty to the workman to approach appropriate government under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. Under these circumstances of the case, the tribunal although holds that the action of the opposite party in terminating the services of the workman was neither legal nor justified. As regards matter ofback wages it is hereby held that the workman shall be entitled to the back wages which he has received from the management in accordance with the orders ofthe Hon'ble High Court . He shall not be entitled for further back wages onthe principle ofno work no pay.

For the Petitioner

: M/s, Balan Haridas ,

R. Kamatchi Sundaresan

: Sri R. Parthiban

For the Management

AWARD

9. For the reasons discussed above , it is held that theaction ofthe management of Food Corporation of India in terminating the services of the workman w. e . f. 30-04-74 is neither legal nor justified, and the order of dismissal dated 30-04-74 is therefore set aside . Consequently, the workman is held entitled for his reinstatement .

TheCentral Government , Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L-42012/ 149 /2005 - IR (CM- II ) dated 11-08-2006 has referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

The Schedule mentioned in that order is :

10.Reference is therefore answered in favour of the workman and against the opposite party.

R. G. SHUKLA , Presiding Officer

"Whether the action of the Management of the Handicraft and Handlooms Export Corporation of India Ltd. , in terminating the services of Sri G. Chandrasekhar w.e.f. 04-02-2002 is legal and justified?

नई दिल्ली, 15 जुलाई , 2008

Ifnot, to what relief is the workman entitled ? "

2.After the receipt of Industrial Dispute, this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 86/2006 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appeared through their advocates and filed their claim and counter statement respectively.

3. The allegations mentioned in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows:

का. आ. 2212.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार हेन्डीक्राफट एण्ड हेन्डलुम एक्सपोर्ट कोर्पोरेशन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण चैत्रई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 86/2006) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[फा.सं. एल -42012/ 149/2005 - आई.आर. ( सीएम- II ) ]

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

The petitioner was appointed as Production Coordinator on 22-08-1997 on a consolidated wages of Rs . 7500/- per month . Though , the Respondent termed the appointment to be one on contract for a period of one year , it was extended even after one year and the petitioner 4499 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

mandatory provisions of Section 25F and since the Respondent has not followed the provisions , the termination is void . Hence , for all these reasons , he prays this Tribunal to set aside the order of termination and to reinstate him in service with full backwages , continuity of service and other attendant benefits .

4. As against this, the Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged the Respondent Management is a Government of India Undertaking mainly engaged in exports of fabrics and garments . The Respondent entrusted the work of manufacture of garments in these units to independent contractors . They have already posted some oftheir regular employees in managerial , supervisory and technical cadre to oversee the production activities . Since, their business depends upon the quantum of orders received for execution every year and to cope with the highly fluctuating and seasonal nature of work , the Respondent engaged the petitioner and others on Annual Contract Basis to assist regular supervisory staff already deployed in the factory. The petitioner was engaged on contract basis to coordinate with regular employee in supervising the activities of garment factory. But, now the industry was undergoing recession and the Respondent inparticular was confronted withdwindling orders and it was economically not viable to keep additional manpower and therefore , it has dispensed with the additional manpower. Further, the existing permanent staff strength was found superfluous to handle the limited order received. Therefore, the Respondent undertook economy measures todownsize the organization and there was no recruitment made to fill up the vacancies that so arose on account of VRS. Due to recession and slowing down of economy in USA, especially after 11-09-2001 , there has been a large scale cancellation of new programs/orders and also substantial reduction of orders already placed. The orders on hand were very few and it was not sufficient even to feed 20% of the capacity . As such, the services of the petitioner became redundant . Hence , no such renewal of contract has been given to the petitioner . The order of appointment of the petitioner itself clearly shows that the appointment was on contractual basis and there is no regular post as Production Coordinator sanctioned in respect of Respondent Corporation . Therefore, the petitioner cannot claim any right to remain in the post. Further , the claim ofthe petitioner for regularization is not amatter ofright . Even while sending the termination order , theRespondent enclosed the Retrenchment Compensation including the notice ofpay and the petitioner has received the same without any protest and realized the amount sent by cheque. The petitioner having accepted the terms and conditions of appointment on contractual basis cannot now make a comparison with the permanent employees . The petitioner's services had been terminated by due process oflawand therefore the order oftermination by theRespondent is legal and according to law. It is false to allege the work of Production Coordinator is a permanent one. It is also not correct to say that the petitioner was doing regular work of the Respondent which is perennial innature. Since the petitioner was appointed on contract basis , it is not necessary to obtain permission under Section25 (N) ofthe ID Act. It is not correct to say that the continued the same work. The work done by the petitioner is permanent in nature and he had been doing regular work ofthe Respondent which is perennial in nature. The petitioner's name has been included in the attendance register of the permanent employee . The Respondent's factory consists ofthree units of stitching section and one unit of finishing section and the Respondent has got orders from Japan, USA for clothes . The exporting of garments is a continuous one . The Respondent have more than sufficient orders . The work of coordination in the production isan integral part of the production and it cannot be said that itwas for a fixed period. The petitioner was also given Overtime due to mounting orders which have to be completedwithin time frame . While so, in order to deprive the benefits of a regular employee , the Respondent after terming the petitioner to have been appointed for fixed tenureandtheyhave not absorbed the petitioner for regular vacancy. The petitioner approached Hon'ble High Court byfiling aWrit Petition in 23234/2001 seeking the reliefof regularization and interim order was also issued in that Writ Petition. But, subsequently the interim order was vacatedbyanorder dated 28-01-2002 . Immediately after thatthe Respondent with a sole intention to make the Writ Petition infructuous terminated the services ofthe petitioner by an order dated 04-02-2002 . Though the petitioner preferredaWrit appeal in W.A. 298/2002 on consideration ofthe fact that he had been already terminated from the services, the Writ Appeal was disposed off. Then again thepetitioner filed W.P. 8317/2002 challenging the order of termination. After this , these WPs were tagged together and finallydisposed off by an order dated 11-09-2004, In that,the High Court dismissed the WPs with liberty to the petitioner to approach the machinery under the IDAct. Theactionofthe Respondent Management in terminating the services of the petitioner is illegal and not justified. Though, there was no renewal of so-called contract, the petitioner continued to work till the illegal order of termination. The so-called contract for fixed tenure was not extended after its term will show that the period fixed itself is sham and to over reach law . Thus , the termination is arbitrary, illegal and done with a sole intention to deprive the petitioner of his legitimate rights . Further , the RespondentCorporation engages more than 100 employees. Therefore, without seeking prior permission as required under 25N of the ID Act, the termination is illegal and therefore the petitioner is deemed to be in service and is entitledtowages every month as per Section 25N (6) ofthe IDAct. The order oftermination is issued only to victimize the petitioner for approaching court . The work done by the petitioner is still continuing and the quota system in exports to USA and other countries , there is increase in order position. The Respondent Management after terminating the services ofthe petitioner has engaged new hands. This is inviolation ofSection 2(G) ofthe ID Act . The petitioner had worked more than 480 days within a period of 24 calendar months and therefore , he is deemed to be a permanent employee under Section 3 of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment ( Conferment ofPermanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981. Since , he has worked for more than240 days within a period of 12 calendar months , prior to his termination, the Respondent has to follow the

2823 GI/08--20 4500

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

work done by the petitioner is a continuous one. The Respondent Corporation is an establishment under the CentralGovernment, therefore , the provisions ofTamil Nadu Shops and Establishment Act is not applicable . Therefore, the petitioner cannot seek permanency under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status toWorkmen) Act, 1981. Hence , for all these reasons, the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .

8. As against this , the Respondent contended that the petitioner was appointed only on contract basis as Production Coordinator to coordinate with the regular employees in supervising the activities of garment factory and since the garment industry was undergoing recession and since the garment orders from foreign countries dwindled during that period, the Mariagement has to undertake economy measures and to downsize the organization it has taken the decision to dispense with the contract employees . As such, the petitioner's services were terminated as per the contract and it was further contended on behalf of the Respondent that as per the contract under the termination order dated 04-02-2002, the Management has also enclosed retrenchment compensation including notice pay to the petitioner and the petitioner has received the same and realized the amount sent by chèque and, therefore, the decision taken by the Respondent cannot be questioned by the petitioner and this claim is not maintainable . In this case , the petitioner examined himself as WWI and produced documents Ex . Wi to Ex, W30 and on the side of the Respondent, one Sivaraman , Asstt . Manager of the Respondent Management was examined as MWI and Ex.MI to Ex.M5 were marked

5. Again in his reply statement/rejoinder , the petitioner has stated even today the units of the RespondentManagement is functioning with full capacity. The Respondent after dispensing the work of permanent employees is entrusting the work of permanent nature on contract basis. It is false to allege that only to copyup with highly fluctuating and seasonal nature of business , the petitioner was engaged: The very fact that the petitioner waswas workingworking overtime month after month till the illegal order of termination will clearly show that their orders were more than sufficient . Even the General Manager of the Respondent Corporation by his letter dated 30-03-2001 to its employees as clearly mentioned that the Corporation is making profits and fixed higher production target for the next year . At present , after abolishing the quota system , the Respondent is flooded with order from various countries. The Respondent Management after dispensing with the permanent employees is executing the orders through contract employees . The recession ofUS economy after 11-09-2001 was only a temporary phenomenon and the orders have not been reduced. The petitioner was selected for a regular post but termed to be on contractual basis for one year. The petitioner having discharged regular nature of work and having worked continuously for five years cannot be retrenched without taking prior permission under Section 25(N) . It is well settled, the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status toWorkmen) Act, 1981 will apply toty to the Central Government industries also. Hence , for all these reasons the petitioner prays and award may be passed in his favour .

6.Points for determination are:

(1) Whether the action of the Respondent Management in terminating the services of the petitioner w.e.f. 04-02-2002 is legal andjustified?

(ii) To what relief is the petitioner entitled?

PointNo.1

9. The learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that though the petitioner was initially appointed on contract basis and subsequently no renewal has been made by the Respondent Authorities and he was continuously working as Production Coordinator and all the benefits was given to the petitioner as that of a regular, employee .. He was provided bonus and he has contributed for Provident Fund deduction and the petitioner has also been given medical card tohis person and to his family members but has not been regularized by the Respondent Authorities and therefore the petitioner has taken the decision to approach the Hon'ble High Court for his regularization. This was done only on the apprehension that he may be ousted at any time without assigning any reasons . While the High Court has granted an interim order, it was vacated subsequently and against that order , the petitioner preferred a Writ Appeal but in the meanwhile taking advantage of the interim order has bnen vacated by the High Court, the Respondent has ousted the services of the petitioner on 04-02-2002 when the main Writ Petition was pending before, the Hon'ble High Court , In the termination order they have stated a simple reason that the Respondent Corporation was running under loss and the Management was downsizing the unit and, therefore , he has dispensed with the services of the petitioner who was appointed on contract basis . But the reasons stated in the termination order are untrue. The Corporation is running on a profit evenduring the period from 1999 to 2002 and they have already received orders from USA, Japan and Germany and other European Union countries . Only to terminate the services of the petitioner , they have alleged that the Corporation is running under loss which is vindictive action taken by the Respondent Management only for the simple reason that the petitioner has dragged the Management byapproaching the Hon'ble High Court for regularization ofhis services . The allegation that the orders were dwindled is a false one. Even today the Respondent Corporation has exported garments to the various countries and the work is 7. The case of the petitioner is that he has been appointed as a Production Coordinator on 22-08-1997 on a consolidated pay of Rs . 7,500 by the Respondent Management though at the first instance he was appointed on contract basis . Subsequently, no renewal has been given to him and he has been working for more than 5 years continuously on a consolidated pay of Rs. 7,500 and when heapproached the Hon'ble High Court for regularizing his service by filing a Writ Petition, the Respondent Management has taken a wrong decision to terminate his services just for the season that he had dragged the Management by approaching the Hon'ble High Court seeking regularization of his services. Therefore, he has raised the dispute for reinstatement with consequential benefits.

IM 4501 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत को राजपत्र अगस्त 9, 2008/ श्रावण 18, 1930

consequential benefits in pursuance of such termination cod In our considered view, in the case on hand, the termination d of the services of the Respondent by the order datedoos 18-02-1999 relieving the respondent from 31-03-1999 would/ squarely fall within the definition of retrenchment undergu ? Section 2(ap ) of the Industrial Disputes Act and consequently, non compliance of stipulations contained ag under Section 25 (F ) of the Industrial Disputes Act would render the very order dated 18-02-1999 invalid . Relying on bus this decision , the learned counsel for the Petitiongrua contended in this case also the though the petitioner wahrge initially appointed on contract basis , his period of contractuos has not been extended subsequently and he was working as Quality Controller with the Respondent Managerment A for more than 5 years and therefore, the termination, orderian ? issued by the Respondent Management would not fully ow exemptunder Section 2 (oo) (bb) and , therefore, in violationsla " of the provisions of the ID Actiu ndustani alddinvs in full swing . Further, till thethe date of termination, the petitioner was in regular work and he was also given overtime allowance till the date of termination and, therefore , the..... order of termination is not legal and abinitio void. The learned counsel for the Petitioner further contended that the Respondent Management after dispensing with the services of the petitioner is now entrusting the work of permanent nature on contract basis which is not legal . Thus, the orders are plenty and the work has also increased manifolds. He further contended that the petitioner is also entitled to the provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Canferment of Permanentat $Status toto Workman) Act, 1981 and, therefore action taken by the Respondent Management is not valid and the learned counsel for the Petitioner relied on the ruling reported in 20072 LLN 212 ELA YAPERUMAL VS STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS wherein the Division Bonch of Hon'ble High Court , Madras has beld "as such provision of Section 4( 1 ) ( c ) of Shops Act which exempted the establishments under Central Government would be of no to apply until exemption is obtained from the State Govt, under Section -9 of Permanent Status Act " . The learned counsel for the petitioner argued thatthat in this case, the.... Respondent Management which is a Central Government Undertaking has not obtained exemption under the State Govt. , the provisions of Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment ofPermanentPermanent Status to Workman) Act , 1981 is applicable and in this case since the petitioner has admittedly worked for more than 480 days in a continuous period of 24 months , he cannot be terminated by the Respondent Authorities togas te arrogates touristiska po

11. But as against this , the learned counsel for the sl Respondent contended though the petitioner has taken 2 the stand before this Tribunal that his contract post was not extended for the period on 1997 , he has admitted in bis claim statement and even before the High Court that he was forced to work on contract basis for nearly 4 and half years and so on. Therefore , the allegation that though he was appointed on contract basis initially, hishis period of contract has not been extended is without any substance, p on the other hand, he has worked continuously as a contract employee ofthe Respondent . Purther, the learned counsel for the Respondent relied on number of Supreme Court decisions on the subject arid argued that the claim of the petitioner is not maintamable as such. The first decision relied on by me learned counsel for the Respondent is 1992 2 LLN 863 DIRECTOR, INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT, UTTARUTTAR PRADESH VS. PUSHPA SRIVASTAVA wherein the Respondent was appointed on contract and ad-hoc basis for fixed period and when the Management has taken the decision terminate her services , the Respondent has taken the matter questioning the termination before the High Court , in thất the Supreme Court has held "where the appointment isailsı contractual and by efflux of time , the appointment comes to an end, the Respondent could have ho right to continue.2 Once thisthis conclusion is arrived at what requires to be examined' is in view ofthe services of the Respondent being continued from time to time on ad - hoc basis for more than a year whether she is entitled to regularization ? The answer is negative to ende , porn vil astro So si to nost od of ginge vholo blon 7RS OF ( 0 )

12. The next decision relied on by the learned counself for the Respondent is reported in 1994 1 LLN 606 ZAKIR HUSSAIN MS ENGINEER- IN - CHIER , IRRIGATION L DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS. In that case whileban considering regularization of persons appointed on adenola hoc basis the Supreme court has held " regularization ofobro persons appointed on ad-hoc basis on daily wages cannotni be made as a " Rule of Thumb merely on the basis of blist completion ofcertain years of service and such persons cannot claim to be negularized as a matter of right ! A2 Regularization depends on various facts and it is fonithesta employer to decide as to whether in facts and circumstances 10. The learned counsel for the Petitioner also relied on the ruling reported in 2005,2 LAN 881 MANAGER, OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD YSG RADHAKRISHNAN wherein the Division Bench of the Hon'ble High Court, Madras has held in case ofa Security Supervisor who wawas appointed on contract basis, subsequently employed directly by the Corporation for a fixed period has been continued to serve as a Security Supervisor when no orders for continuation was issued by the Respondent Management and when the matter came up before the High Court on his termination on his attainment of 58 years, the High Court held " even though such an engagement of the Respondent continuously lasted for nearly 11 long years atleast from 1988, we wonder whether there could be an un - ceremonial termination as resorted to at the instance of the Appellant in total violation of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act. In other words , we are obliged to state that the stand of the Appellant that the engagement of the services of the Respondent was for a fixed period which commenced on 13-01-1988 and therefore the disengagemont.from 31-03-1999 should be merely taken as a disengagement in s terms of original order of engagement dated 21-01-1988 and therefore it should be held that the Respondent was vr not entitled for any relief would be in total derogation ofnod and on a misreading of Section 2( 00 )( bb ) of the Industrial Disputes Act. We are afraid that such blindfolded approachnoll cannot be made when the facts involved disclose that the Respondent would atleast be entitled for certain 4502

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] ofthe case, such services of employees appointed on ad- hocbasis should be regularized . " The next decision relied by the learned counsel for the Respondent is reported in 2005 1 SCC 639 MAHINDRA L. JAIN VS. INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS wherein the Supreme Court while considering regularization has held "regularization cannot be claimed as a matter of right . Illegal appointment cannot be regularized by taking recourse to regularization . What can be regularized is an irregularity and not an illegality. A daiiy-wager in the absence of statutory provision in this behalf would not be entitled to regularization" The next decision relied on by the learned counsel forthe Respondent is reported in 2007 7 MLJ 844 STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER VS. KARSANBHAI K. RABARI AND OTHERS . In that the Supreme Court while considering regularization of daily workers appointed on temporary basis has clearly stated "claiming regularization of service and to all benefits available to a regular employees under the Govt . resolution dated 17-10-1998 is not permissible when the appointment ismade in contravention of the rules " . The next decision relied on by the learned counsel for the Respondent is reported in 2007 , 1 , SCC, 408 wherein the Supreme Court hasheld" a daily-rated or casual worker is only a temporary employee and it is well settled that a temporary employee has no right to the post or to be continued in service to get absorption far less ofbeing regularized and getting regular pay.No doubt , there can be occasions when the State or its instrumentalities employ persons on temporary or daily- wage basis in a contingency as additional hands without following the required procedure but this does not confer any right on such persons to continue in service or get regular pay " . The next decision relied on by the learned counsel for theRespondent is reported in 2007 2 SCC 324 ACCOUNTS OFFICER ( A & I ), SPSRTC AND OTHERS VS. K.V. RAMANA AND OTHERS wherein the Supreme Court followed thedecision reported in 2006 4 SCC 1 SECRETARY, STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. UMA DEVI and held "Casual Ad-hoc workers or contract labourers even though they have worked for a long period , they cannot be regularized dehors the rules for selection " . The next decision relied on by the learned counsel for the Respondent is reported in 2007 2 SCC 428 PSEB AND ANOTHER VS. SUDESH KUMAR PURI . In that the Supreme Court has held "though the present case is one of contract labour . On the contrary there was an agreement governing the engagement . The payment was made per meter reading at a fixed rate and there was no regular employment ever offered to any of the Respondents . The provisions of Section- 2(00)(bb ) of the Act clearly apply to the facts of the case. The material on record clearly established that the engagement of the Respondent was for a specific period and conditional . On the engagement of regular meter readers , the engagement was dispensed with. The contract clearly governed the terms of engagement. Therefore, the orders passed by the Labour Court and High Court for reinstatement and back wages are clearly untenable" . The next decision relied on by the learned counsel for the Respondent is reported in 2007 7 SCC 748 GANGA KISAN SAHKARI CHINI MILLS LTD . VS. JAI VEER SINGH where the Supreme Court has held " workman appointed

on seasonal posts for the whole season, the termination of service of, held, does not amount to retrenchment in view ofSection 2 ( oo)(bb ) . Hence direction to reinstate workmen with back wages by courts below set aside" . The learned counsel for the Respondent relied on all these decision and argued the petitioner was appointed as a Production Coordinator and even in the order of appointment itself, it isclearly stated that the appointment was on contract basis and even in that order itself it is stated that the services would be terminated with 1 month's notice on either side . Inthe Respondent Corporation , there is no regular post as Quality Controller and the petitioner was not appointed through open process of selection and therefore cannot claim any right to remain in the post and he has also no right to seek regularization of the service in the Respondent Corporation. Even in the Writ Petition filed by the petitioner , the Hon'ble High Court has observed that the petitioner would not be entitled for regularization of the service based onpast performance of the Corporation . It is also observed that even assuming that the Corporation is in sound financial position , the claim of the petitioner for regularization is not a matter of right . In this case, the Respondent Management while sending the termination order on 04-02-2002 had also enclosed retrenchment compensation including the notice of pay totaling to Rs . 23,365/-. The petitioner received the same without any protest and realized the amount sent by the cheque and, therefore , he cannot be heard to say that his services should be regularized in the Respondent Corporation . Since the garment industry was undergoing recession after 2001 and the Respondent was confronted with dwindling orders , theRespondent Management felt economically not viable to keep additional manpower and, therefore , dispensed with the contract service of the petitioner . The contract service of the petitioner cannot be deployed /utilized elsewhere as the other trade activities of the Respondent did not require the technical expertise of the petitioner for closer monitoring. Further , the Respondent Management has also introduced VRS and in that more than 120 employees were relieved from the services of the Respondent Corporation and thereafter no recruitment was made to fill up the vacancies . After 11-09-2001 , due to recession in and slowdown of economy in US , there has been a large scale of cancellation of new programmes/ orders and also substantial reduction in the orders already placed and the orders on hand with were very few and it was not sufficient even to feed 20% of the capacity. In the circumstances , the existing staff strength of the Respondent organization was required to be further reduced . As such , the services of the petitioner became redundant . Under these circumstances , the Respondent has taken the decision no such renewal of the contract to the petitioner is to be given and therefore the action of the Respondent Management cannot be questioned that too by the petitioner . It is further argued the Respondent has strictly complied with the provisions of Section - 25 ( F ) of the ID Act before terminating the services of the petitioner and the petitioner's services had been terminated by due process of law. Further the issue regarding regularization and the financial position, the Hon'ble High Court has also concluded the issue , hence it is not open to the petitioner to raise the same issue over !

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

and above again. Though, the petitioner alleged that the Respondent Management is running in profit, he has not produced any documents to show that the garment business of the Respondent Management is running in profit. Admittedly, now the Respondent Management is running only one shift since there is no orders of garments , therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to any relief.

4503

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/श्रावण 18 , 1930

Point No. 2

The next pointto be decided in this case is to what reliefthe petitioner is entitled ?

15. In view of my foregoing findings , the action taken bytheRespondent Management in terminating the services ofthe petitioner is legal andjustified, I find the petitioner is not entitled to any relief.

16. Thus, the reference is answered accordingly. (Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this daythe 25thApril, 2008)

K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined:

WWI SriG.Ghandrasekhar Forthe I Party/Petitioner

13. But as against this , the learned counsel for the Petitioner contended though the Respondent Management has stated after 2002 the orders for the garment business has been dwindled, he has not produced any documents to show that the orders have been reduced after 2001. On the other hand, the petitioner has produced document to show that the business of the Respondent Management is running in profit and it is evident from the fact that bonus was given to the regular employees . Further, in this case, most of the case decisions relied on by the learned counsel for the Respondent are related to regularization of the services of the employee, on the other hand , in this case the petitioner only approached this Tribunal for reinstatement with consequential benefits, therefore, the petitioner is entitled to the relief since he has established that the order of termination passed by the Respondent Authorities is not legal . But again , the learned counsel for the Respondent contended though the petitioner has produced a statement that the Respondent Management isrunning in profit, - the Respondent Management has got other business viz. Handloom exports , Jewellery, etc. The profit and loss account produced by the petitioner is only with regard to overall business of the Respondent Management. On the other hand, it is admitted by the petitioner that the Respondent Management has not recruited any new employees after the termination of the petitioner and after the employees has gone on VRS . Under such circumstances , it is not correct to say that the petitioner's termination is illegal and that the Respondent has not followed the mandatory provisions of the ID Act. For the II Party/Management MWI Sri.C. Sivaraman Documents Marked:

On thePetitioner's side

Ex.No. Date

Description

EX.W1 13-08-1997 Interview Call Letter

EX.W2 22-08-1997 Appointment Letter

EX.W3 19-09-1997 OfficeOrder

EX.W4 Sept. 1997 PaySlip

EX.W5 31-03-1998 Statement of P.F.

EX.W6 17-06-1998 Form 16 under 1.T. Act EX.W7

Audited Profit for 1999-2000 EX.W8 31-03-1999 Statement of P.F.

EX.W9 28-04-1999 Form 16 under 1.T. Act EX.W10 03-04-1998 Letter ofRespondent

EX.Wil 03-04-1998 Form 13 under P.F. Act EX.W12 01-03-2000 Family Pension Scheme

Nomination

EX.W13 29-11-2000 P.F. Statement

EX.W14 28-04-1999 Income Tax Statement

Income Tax Statement

EX.W15 April 2000

EX.W16 October 2000 Attendance Register

EX.W17 22-12-2000 OfficeOrder

Overtime Statement

EX.W18 Jan. , 2001

EX.W19 Feb. , 2001 Overtime Statement

EX.W20 30-03-2001 Letter ofG.Μ.

Overtime Statement

EX.W21 Mar. , 2001

toNov. ,2001

EX.W22 19-11-2001 Order Sheet

EX.W23 15-12-2001 Invoice

EX.W24 15-12-2001 Invoice

EX.W25 Dec. , 2001 WageSlip

EX.W26 08-01-2002 Invoice

Invoice

EX.W27 10-01-2002

EX.W28 09-01-2002 Letter ofGM

EX.W29

Performance ofHHEC since 1996- 97 to2004-05

On the Management's side

14. I find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent because in this case even though there is no renewal of contract in writing by the Respondent Management with regard to contract entered into between the petitioner and the Management, it is admitted by the petitioner that all along he has worked as a contract employee on contract basis . Further, in this case it is not established before this Court after the termination of the petitioner any persons has been appointed as a Production Coordinator in the Respondent Management, though , it is alleged that the business is running in profit, there is no specific documents to show that the garment business of the Respondent Management is running in profit. On the other hand, it is established by the Respondent Management that the Respondent has closed 2 units and that too running only in one shift. Therefore , even assuming for argument sake that the engagement of the services of the petitioner was not for a fixed period, since the petitioner is not appointed for a regular post and since the Respondent has followed the mandatory section of the ID Act, I find the petitioner cannot question the order of termination passed by the Respondent Authority dated4-2-2002 and as such I find this point against thepetitioner.

Ex.No. Date

Description

EX.MI 22-08-1997 Offer of Appointment

EX.M2 01-09-1997 Acceptance of appointment EX.M3 19-09-1997 Appointment and period of contract

Ex.M4 02-02-2002 Payment made under Section 25F ofthe ID Act and

04-02-2002 Order oftermination

Ex.M5 26-11-2001 Affidavit filed in W.P. No. 2334 of2001 4504

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

1

him from anybody.

नई दिल्ली , 15 जुलाई , 2008

That the Respondent No.1 also interviewed the workman on 31-7-1989 vide its letter No. 3 /5 /CSM /Canteen/ 89/953 dtd . 13-7-89 alongwith other 42 candidates. It is stated that the workman was the only experienced candidate from thedeptt: already working on the post interviewed for.

का. आ. 2213.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल सोईल एण्ड मेंटेरियल रिसर्च स्टेशन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 11 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 84/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

That it is stated that in addition to the experience , the workman also possessed sufficient academic qualification , i.e. M.A. Degree with Science subject upto Intermediate.

[फा.सं. एल-42012/155/1995- आई.आर. (डी.यू.) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 15th July, 2008

That after the in terview the workman was assured regularization and allowed to work against the said post of coupen clerk till 15-1-90 . However on 15-1-90 the workman was directed to hand over the charge of coupen clerk to one Shri Gulab Singh arbitrarily without assigning any reason.

$.O. 2213. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 84/96) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court No. II , New Delhi , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Soil and Materials Research Station and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 15-7-2008 .

That it is further stated that the said Gulab Singh was employed in place of the workman only because his father is stated to be employed in Central Water Commission under the same Deptt. / Ministry/ Mi and is stated to be posted with some Senior Officer . As such , except undue influence , the said Gulab Singh had not special additional qualification to gain weightage over the workman.

[F.No. L-42012/ 155 / 1995 - IR(D.U. ) ]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL

GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT - II, NEW DELHI

PRESIDING OFFICER: R.N.RALI.D. No. 84/1996

IN THE MATTER OF :

Shri Anil Sharma

That thereafter the workman was assured by Respondent No.l that the workman would be accommodated/ regularized against L.A. Gr. 114 as helper Gr.III , in CSMRS . The workman continued to work even after 15-1-90 under further promise and ultimately his services were terminated w.e.f. 15-4-90 without assigning any reason and/ or service of satutory notice under section 25 F of Industrial Disputes Act and/ or retrenchment compensation therefore despite the fact that the workman has been in continuous employment of the management for more than 240 days in the preceding years.

S/o Shri Gopal Singh , R/o R2Z- 211 , Gali No. 9, Raj Nagar Part -II , Palam Colony, New Delhi -45. C/o Shri Jagdish Sharma ,

WZ-739- A, Palam Village, New Delhi -45 .

VERSUS

TheDirector,

M/s. Central Soil and Materials

Research Station , Hauz Khas , New Delhi - 110016.

AWARD

Itis stated that there has been instances that workman working in the Departmental Canteen under Respondent were regularized in the main organization. For instance , Mrs. Ramani Devi working as coupen clerk like the workman, prior to him was regularized and posted in E- 1 Section. Likewise, the respondent had in past in 79-80 had appointed and regularized the services of Shri Ram Kishan as Lab Helper from Canteen and that of Shri Sukha Singh from Canteen to Store Deptt .

The Ministry of Labour by its letter No , L-42012/ 155/95 - IR(DU) Central Government dt . 27-8-96 has referred the following point for adjudication.

The point runs as hereunder:

"Whether the action of the management ofC.S.M.R.S.

That non - regularisation of the services of the workman as coupen clerk and alternatively as L.A. Gr . III or as helper Gr . III under Respondent and instead termination thereof his services w.e.f. 15-4-90 is illegal , arbitrary and discriminatory and violative of articles 14 , 16 and 21 ofthe Constitution of India and also being violative of Principle ofNatural Justice and against Sec . 25 F of the 1.D.Act .

in terminating the services of Shri Anil Sharma, Daily Wager Coupen Clerk working in the departmenta! canteen w.e.f. 28-2-90 is legal and justified . Ifnot, what reliefthe workman is entitled to and since when ?"

That owing to the illegal termination ofhis services , the workman has been rendered jobless . The workman has all along been representingto the Respondent for consideration of his claim and merit of his services but without any result .

Theworkman applicant has filed claim statement . In the claim statement it has been stated that the workman/ applicant was employed by the Respondent No. 1 as coupen clerk in the Deptt. Canteen and maintained by the management wie.f. [email protected] per day being paid on monthly basis . His duties included preparation of sale register , stock account, sale of coupens to the staff.

That ultimately the workman served upon the Respondent a legal notice of demand vide letter dated 18-5-92 , but the same was also not acted upon and, therefore , the workman filed application before the Labour Commissioner ( Central ) for reconciliation . However, owing Thatthe workman has been discharging his duties withsincerety and devotion without any complaint against 0024505 [ भागभाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

to attitude of the management , the conciliation proceedings tot and, therefore, failed and, therefore,therefo finally the dispute has been referred by thethe competent authority before the Hon'ble Tribunal in terms ofGovt. of India, Mo Labour's letter dtd 27-8-96 .

sized bitis correct that the workman /applicant was employed as a daily rated labourer @ Rs 23.25 per day w.e.ffr23-4- t 1989. There was no such duty assigned to Shri AnihSharma like preparation of sale register i stook account, sale of coupons to the staff sto. He was performing any duty duly assigned by the Manager (Canteen) as per requirerbents of work from time to time .

S JPG w nauhow binh an lisha and 20 It is not correct that there were 42 candidates who appeared before the Selection Committee of the app Departmental Canteen for the post of Coupon Clerk. In all there were 15 candidates who were present and considered 3021by the Selection Committee for the interview. Shri Anil Sharha was also present in the said interview

The selection for the post was made by the duly constituted selection Committee considering the suitability including prior experience of all the candidates who bosappeared fortheianterviewinA iniciomis sa In the written statement the management stated that prior to 1-10-1991 CSMRS Departmental Canteen was.not a Government-controlled canteen. It was being paid 70 per cent subsidies and was run by a management committee comprising of Chairhan, Honorary Secretary, Treasurer and some members . In case of need such as scarcity of staff, casual workers like sweepers , bearers , waiters , wash boys etc.were engaged on purely daily wage basis for a limited period only without giving them any assurance that they would be absorbed on regular basis , In case of regular appointment for any category of post, requisition for suitable candidates was sent to local employment exchange and Directorate of Departmental Canteen as well and appointment waswas made following due procedure.

? Thebio- dara including qualifications and experience of aff the candidates who appeared for the interview was duly considered by the Selection Committee before or selection of the candidate, for the post of Coupon Clerk in misS SMRS cantsanova ali bomotion and drobnijst Shri Anil Sharma was engaged as one such casual worker on daily wage basis in the Departmental Canteen of CSMRS @ Rs . 23.25 per day with effect from May, 1989. In all, he worked in this office, canteen, for a total period of 149 days as per details given below a tad bewoivistai

days:

April 1989

May, 1989

23 dayfon us

June , 1989

anmoo22

hola zai

days

aid ? Ako ពន

du July, 1989man

23 dayşiquit

August, 1989 and

catti It is not correct that the said Shri Gulab Singh Joon arti was employed in place of the workman only because his father was stated to be employed in the Central Water Commission under the same Department/Ministry . As Shri Gulab Singh Joon was selected by the interview committee mentioned above, he was offered the post ofCoupon Clerk and appointed.

beil @ sdays zi

September, 1989 wit

2 days b

October, 1989.vivinow sil

November, 1989

19 daysivon

Statement is deniednoit bonader ави !! Ansio non The Industrial Dispute Act is not applicable to the Departmeritar Canteen nome 10 ha visch vui December, 1989

to 20 days

difa

eoqu 20 daysog ordi

January , 1990s a

a122 days 201

February , 1990gsstoffs

216days

inestabl on (1 ) Shri Sukha Singh was appointed as Store (0 ) Attendant (Group C) on work charged establishment of CSMRS in the pay scale of Rs . 260-400 wie. fi forenoon of 21st September 1979 and was brought on to the regular establishment of CSMRSnt of CSMRS against the post of Store Attendant (Group C) w.e.f. Ist October , 1985. He had worked only for 52 days as a labourer on daily wages basis (w.e.f. 1-8-79 to 21-9-79 ) and was absorbed in CSMBS compassionate ground consequent upon the death of his mothermother whowho waswas a work charged employee in CSMRS then , a Dte . of CWCWC organizationorganization ning et toiseltaisup

Shri Ram Kishan was appointed as Observation Khalast (Group B) of work charged establishment of SMS in the day scate ofRs. 192 232 w.e.fw.e.f. 19th June , 1980. He was wansferred from work charged establishment to the regular establishment of CSMRS against the post of LaboratoryHelper GraHI (Group D)wief IstOctober , 1985 vin & SMRS canteen at any time, quo 25 goiхтом Apost of Coupon Clerk fell vacant on 23-1-1989 in the CSMRS Canteen , As per Directorate of Departmental Canteen Rules, the post was advertised and requisition was also sent to Employment Exchange for sending suitable candidates for the said post as well as to the Directorate of Departinental, Canteen to sponsor the names of suitable persons from amongst the regular eligible staff. As a result, the Department ( Management Committee) received applications from 15, candidates Shri Anil Sharma after knowing that a post ofof coupon, clerk had fallen vacantB-vacant in CSMRS also sent his application, His name we was not sponsored either by the Employment Exchange or by Directorate ofDepartmental, Canteens, The interview for the selection to the post of coupon clerk was held on 31-7-1989 and one Shri Gulab Singh Joon whose name was sponsored by the Chairman of the Irrigation and Power Departmental Canteen and who had worked there for twovo years as Coupon Clerk was selected, Shri Anil Sharma went on working as casual labour up to February , 1990990 when he was removed from the Muster Roll.

dai zs teSmti Ramahi Devi (nw Mrs. Ramani S.Nair ) was a smoregular employee in the CSMRS Departmental Canteen to holding thethe post ofCoupon Clerk ( Group C ) in the pay te-pay seal of Rs. 220338 from 28th April , 1983 to 7th June, 1988 until her accepting the lower post of Laboratory Helper GrⅢ(Group D) in CSMRS on her own request as she was not satisfied working as Coupon Clerk in cartoon, She was later on appointed to the post of Laboratory Helper Gr.III in the regular establishment of CSMRS w.art forenoon of 8th June, 1988 for permanent absorption ontransfer basis.

Shri Anil Sharma has , therefore , no claimclaim for appointment to the post ofCoupon Clerk onon regregular basis . Parawise comments on the statement of claim by Shri Anil Sharma are furnished as belows us ton at f 4506

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9, 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] : The workman was engaged on daily rated basis for some specific period@ Rs . 23.25 per day because there was scarcity of staff in the Departmental Canteen and , therefore , the question of violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and that of Principle ofNatural Justice and Section 25 ( F) of the I.D. Act does not arise .

The said workman was not terminated from his services but it was purely a disengagement being a daily ratedworker.

names of candidates . 15 names were forwarded by the Employment Exchange . Sh . Anil Sharma after knowing that thepost ofCoupon Clerk is vacant in CSMRS also sent his application . His name was not sponsored either by Employment Exchange or Directorate of departmental canteen for the post of Coupon Clerk . Sh . Gulab Singh's name was sponsored by the Chairman of Irrigation and Power who had worked there for two years as Coupon Clerk and was selected . Sh . Anil Sharma went on working ascasual labour up to February, 1990 when he was removed from the muster roll . He has not claimed for the appointment to the post of Coupon Clerk .

Onfiling an application for the said purpose by the workmanbefore the Labour Commissioner, all the facts of the case were filed and submitted by this office before the said office.No undertaking was given by this office to. engage him on regular basis since there is no post lying vacant in this office.

Itwas submitted that Sh . Sukhdev Singh , Ram Kisan and Raman were appointed prior to this workman . They are notjunior to him , so no junior to the workman has been selected.

The claim ofShri Anil Kumar Sharma, the daily rated casual labourer does not hold goodIn view of the Supreme Court Judgement decided on November 21 , 1994 in the case ofCasual Workers of MCD Vs. MCD .

The workman has stated in his cross - examination that he was not selected from the Employment Exchange and he was being appointed on casual labour basis . He used to work on other job also in addition to Coupon Clerk. He has also stated that he has applied for the post of Coupon Clerk when the post was advertised . He was interviewed but he did not receive any selection letter.

The workman applicant has filed rejoinder. In the rejpinder he has reiterated the averments of his claim statement and has denied most of the paras of the written statement . The management has also denied most of the paras of the claim statement .

Hisservices were terminated on 16-04-1990 without any notice or notice pay.

Evidence of both the parties has been taken .

Heard argument from both the sides and perused the papers on the record.

The workman has clearly admitted in his cross- examination that his name was not sponsored from the Employment Exchange . He was working as a casual labour basis . He applied for the post of Coupon Clerk after advertisement . He was not given selection letter after interview.

Itwas submitted from the side of the workman that he was engaged by the respondent No.1 as Coupon Clerk inthedepartment ofCanteen maintained by the management w.e.f. 23-04-1989 @ Rs . 23.25 per day.

That on 15-01-1990 the workman was directed to handover the charge of Coupon Clerk to one Sh. Gulab Singh arbitrarily without assigning any reason .

That Sh . Gulab Singh was employed in the place of the workman only because his father is stated to be employed in Central Water Commission in the same Department/Ministry and he was posted with same officer so under andue influence , Sh . Gulab Singh was given preference. Sh . Gulab Singh had not any additional qualification to gain weightage over the workman .

That services of the workman continued upto 15-04-1990 . His services were terminated illegally without complying with the provisions of Section 25 F of the I.D. Act,1947.

The case of the workman is that he was appointedat the post of Coupon Clerk is belied by his admission in cross examination . He has categorically admitted that he . was engaged as casual labour basis . He has also admitted that he was not sponsored by Employment Exchange . Sh . Gulab Singh's name was recommended by the competent authority and after interview, selection letter was issued to him by the selection committee . Sh . Gulab Singh has been selected by the selection committee. It is up to the discretion of the selection committee to select a candidate who has come through the proper channel . The name of this workman was not forwarded by Employment Exchange whereas the name of Sh . Gulab Singh has been forwarded by the employment exchange . The workman applied for the post of Coupon Clerk on the basis of advertisement. The Employment Exchange forwarded 15 names for posting to the post of Coupon Clerk . The selection Committed selected Sh . Gulab Singh out ofthose 15 candidates .

Itwas further submitted that Mrs. Ramani Devi was working as Coupon Clerk and prior to him she was regularized . Sh . Ram Kisan was regularized in past as Lab . Helper from Canteen and that Sh . Sukhdev Singh from Canteen to Store Department. Termination of services of theworkman is illegal and in violation of Articles 14 , 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

Theworkman was not working as a Coupon Clerk so there is no question of seniority. He was a casual labour . He was not found eligible by Employment Exchange and so his name was not forwarded. Selection Committee has selected Sh . Gulab Singh out of 15 candidates in its discretion.

The three names mentioned by the workman who were regularized were quite senior to him and they have beenregularized prior to his engagement as casual labour . Itisnot the case of the workman that the vacancy of Coupon It was submitted from the side of the management thatdepartmental canteen was not a government controlled canteen. The post of Coupon Clerk fell vacant on 23-01-1989 in CSMRS Canteen . The post was advertised and the Employment Exchange was asked to sponsor the 4507

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9, 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 15-07-2008 .

[F. No. L-40012/ 164/96-IR (DU) ] Clerk is still existing . The selection committee selected Sh . Gulab Singh out of 15 candidates forwarded by Employment Exchange. No discrimination has been made . Howeverthis workman has worked for more than 240 days .

SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer It has been held in (2007) 9. Supreme Court Cases 353 as under:

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT CHENNAI

Tuesday, the Ist July, 2008

Present : K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No.483/2001

(Inthe matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofsub -section ( 1 ) and sub -section 2(A) of Section 10ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), between the Management of Madras Telephones and their Workman)

BETWEEN

IParty/Petitioner

SriR. Seethapathi

Vs.

"Labour Law Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 S. 25F - Relief to be given for violation of Grant of compensation instead of reinstatement with full back wages - When warranted Workman appointed as daily wager , working for only a short period , raising industrial dispute almost six years after dismissal , and there being question as to the whether his appointment had been made in terms of the statutory rules in the first place Held, relief of reinstatement with full back wages would not be granted automatically only because it would be lawful to do so- Several factors have to be considered , two of them being as to whether appointment in question had been made in terms of the statutory rules , and the delay in raising the industrial dispute In present case , keeping in view the nature and period of services , and the delay in raising the industrial dispute , award of reinstatement with back wages substituted by compensation of Rs.75, 000/- " .

II Party/Respondent.

The ChiefGeneral Manager Madras

Telephones , Madras-600001

Inview of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court theworkman is entitled to compensation of Rs.50 , 000/- by way of retrenchment compensation and one month's pay in lieu ofnotice .

APPEARANCE

The reference is replied thus:

Sri J. Muthukumaran .

For the Petitioner

Sri M.Govindaraaj .

For theManagement

AWARD

The action of the management of C.S.M.R.S. in terminating the services of Shri Anil Sharma, DailyWager Coupen Clerk working in the departmental canteen w.e.f. 28-2-90 is neither legal norjustified . The workman applicant is entitled to get compensation of Rs . 50,000/-by way of retrenchment compensation and one month's pay in lieu ofnotice within two months from the date of the publication ofthe award .

TheCentral Govemment, Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L-40012/ 164/96- IR(DU) dated 04-02-1998 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

The award is given accordingly.

The schedule mentioned in that order is :

Date:30-06-2008

R. N. RAI , Presiding Officer

नईदिल्ली , 15 जुलाई , 2008

"Whether the action of the management of Madras Telephones , Madras - I in terminating the services of Shri R. Seethapathi , Casual Labour w.e.f. 14-04-1995 isjustified or not? If not justified to what relief he is entitled?"

का., आ. 2214.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मद्रास टेलीफोन्स के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 483/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

2.After the receipt of the Industrial Dispute , the Tamil Nadu Industrial Tribunal has numbered as I.D. 29/98 and issued notices to both parties . Both parties entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively . After this Constitution of Central Government Industrial Tribunal , the said I.D. was transferred to this Tribunal and renumbered as483/2001.

[फा. सं. एल-40012/ 164/96- आईआर ( डीयू) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

3. The allegations in the Claim Statement are briefly as follows:

NewDelhi , the 15th July, 2008

S.O. 2214. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 483 / 2001) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Chennai , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Madras Telephones and their

The petitioner was employed as a Wash Boy in the Departmental Canteen of the Respondent in its Telephone Exchange at Flower Bazar , NSC Bose Road, Chennai . The petitioner was engaged from 1988 continuously . The Canteen is run round the clock in three shifts and caters to nearly 1,500 employees in the office . There are 21 permanent employees and 8 Casual Labourers including the petitioner . Pursuant to the judgement of the Supreme Court , the Department of Personnel , Public Grievances and Pension 2823 G1 /08-21 4508

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 9 , 2008/SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

this Tribunal . When the inatter was considered by the High Court in Writ Petition , the order passed by this Tribunal has been set aside and the matter was remanded to this Tribunal again to dispose of the matter on merits . After this remand, the Petitioner and Respondent were not appeared for several hearings . After a long lapse of time, the petitioner has filed Proof of Affidavit and the Respondent has never appeared before this Court to cross- examine the petitioner.

Therefore, this Tribunal has no other option except to dispose of the matter ex parte. Again the Respondent has filed an application to set aside the ex parte order in which a conditional order was passed by this Tribunal but evenafter several hearings , the Respondent neither fulfilled the conditions nor appeared before this Court . Therefore , the petition to set aside the ex parte order was dismissed and orders was passed .

6. Points for consideration are :

(1 ) Whether the action of the Respondent Management in terminating the services of the petitioner isjustified?

(2) To what relief the petitioner is entitled?

Point No. 1

issued an OM dated 29-01-1992 stating that the employees of the non - statutory departmental/ cooperative canteen/ Tiffin rooms located in Central Government Office should be treated as Government servants w.e.f. 1-10-1991 . The Casual Labourers recruited prior to 30-03-1985 were regularized in terms of Casual Labourers (Grant of Temporary Status and Regularisations) Scheme , 1989 . While so , the Respondent issued a notice dated 15-03- 1995 under Section 25 (F) ofthe I.D. Act and further proposed to disengage the petitioner from 14-04-1995 on account of being no work in the Canteen. The petitioner challenged the above retrenchment notice before the Central Administrative Tribunal ( CAT) in O.A. No. 445/95 but the CAT has disposed of the matter stating the petitioner should approach the forum available under the I.D. Act . Thereafter, the petitioner raised a dispute before the labour authorities since the conciliation is not feasible, the matter was referred to this Tribunal . The allegation in the retrenchment notice that there is no work in the Canteen is false one . Even today , the Respondent Management is engagingworkers on contract basis for its day to day work . One Smt . K. Rajalakshmi , Smt . S. Ranjini , Sri Selvakumar were employed from 14-04-1995 to 10-08-1996 on contract basis.Therefore, it is false to say that there is no work in this Canteen. The action of the Respondent Management is contraryto Section 25(N) also in as much as no permission was sought from the Government before terminating the service ofthe petitioner. Anyhow, the petitioner has worked more than 480 days in a continuous period of 24 months and is deemed to be a regular workman as per the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Grant of Permanent Status to Workman) Act and, therefore , the order passed by the Respondent Authorities is. illegal and void ab initio . Hence, he prays this Tribunal for reinstatement in service with full backwagses and other consequential relief.

4. As against this , the Respondent in his Counter Statement contended that only due to change in technology and other administrative exigencies the Canteen of the Respondent at present caters to only 700 persons . Therefore , the workload of the Canteen has actually reduced. Due to reduced volume of work , a decision was taken by the authorities to disengage the petitioner and only when there is exigencies like heavy absenteeism and specific extra works to be undertaken , persons were engaged for short duration on payment froin Canteen proceeds on contract basis . As such , now the strength of the Canteen staff is commensurate with the workload. The petitioner was paid only from the Canteen proceeds and Welfare Subsidy . Therefore , the contention that he should be considered as a Casual Labourer is incorrect . Since the petitioner was not engaged on inuster roll and paidfrom thedepartmental funds , the question of treating him on par with Casual Labourer of the department does not arise. It is not correct to say that the petitioner has completed 480 days of continuous work during 24 calender months , hence , theRespondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .

7. The petitioner in his Proof of Affidavit alleged what are all he stated in the Claim Statement. Further , he alleged from the year 1988 to 1994, he served 287 days , 345 days, 339 days , 324 days , 336 days , 290 days and 360days respectively. The Senior Assistant Traffic Superintendent has also given a certificate to that effect . Since he has served from 1988 , he argued that he should have been absorbed as a permanent employee from 01-10-1991 as per theGovernment of India Memorandum dated 29-01-1992 . On the other hand when doing this , the Respondent Management has issued a notice dated 15-03-1995 under Section 25 ( F) of the 1.D. Act and disengaged him . The reason mentioned in the retrenchment notice is that there is no work in the Cameen and , therefore, they have disengaged him . But even after that the Respondent Management has engaged labourers on short-term basis which is illegal . One Mr. Edward was working as a Casual Labourer (Cleaner) frorn 01-01-1991 and his services were terminated from 20-01-1995 . He filed a Claim Petition before theTribunal and the Tribunal has passed an award on 22-05- 2000 in his favour. Similarly , one Rathinam and B. Soundaranan, Casual Labourers have also raised disputes and awards were passed in their favour. In 1.D. 66 and 70/98 , the petitioners filed all the awards passed by the Tamil Nadu Industrial Tribunal to substantiate his claim and he prays a similar award be passed in his favour and he marked the copy of the certificate issue by the first Respondent official as Ex. WI , copy of the letter sent to RLC as Ex . W2 , copy of the letter sent by the Respondent Management to him as Ex.W3 . The order passed by the Respondent Authorities dated 15-03-1995 as Ex .W4, the copy ofthe order passed by the CAT as Ex . W5 and the minutes of joint discussion between the Management and the workman as Ex.W6 and Ex.W8 and the copy of the letter from the Management to the Registrar to the Regional Commissioner of Labour as Ex.W7 and he marked the copy of the award in I.D. 69/99

asEx.W9 .

5.At the first instance since the petitioner remained absent, he was called ex parte and the petition filed by the petitioner to set aside the ex parte order was dismissed by [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

4509

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/श्रावण 18 , 1930

Ex. No. Date

8. As against this , though the Respondent filed a Counter Statement, he has not appeared before this Tribunal to dispute the claim of the petitioner. Since the petitioner has established that he has worked more than 240 days in acontinuous period of 12 months and since the Respondent hasnot established that there is no work in the Canteen as alleged by them in the Counter Statement , I am inclined to accept the contention ofthe petitioner that the retrenchment orderpassedby the Respondent Authorities is notjustified.

Hence, I find the point in favour of the petitioner.

Point No. 2

9. In view of my foregoing findings, I find the petitioner is entitled to the relief of reinstatement and backwages with other consequential benefits .

10. Thus the reference is disposed of accordingly.

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by ma in the open court on this day the 1st July, 2008) .

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer Witness Examined:

None

For the Ist Party/Petitioner:

For the IInd Party/Management : None

Documents Marked:

On the Petitioner's side

Date

Ex. No.

Description

Ex.W1

Certificate issued by the Madras Telephones

Ex.W2

Particular issued by the Management regarding the number ofdays the petitioner had worked during the years 1983-1993

Ex.W3

Letter from the petitioner to the Regional Commissioner ofLabour Ex. W4 18-01-1993 Sanction memo issued by the Madras Telephones

Ex.W5 23-02-1993 Internal Correspondence Ex. W6 13-01-1994 Letter from the petitioner to the Management

Ex. W7 10-02-1994 Letter from the petitioner to the Management

Ex. W8 15-03-1995 Orderunder Section-25F ofthe 1.D. Act, 1947

Ex.W9 31-03-1995 Voucher issued by the Departmental Canteen Ex.W10-26-08-1996 Minutes of Joint Discussion and ConciliationProceedings Ex.W11 25-04-1995 Order of the Central Administrative Tribunal Ex.W12 May, 1996 Letter from the petitioner to the Asstt. Labour Commissioner (C) Ex.W13 24-06-1996 Letter from the Chairman TMX Canteen to the Asstt . Labour Commissioner ( C)-II

Description

Ex.W14 23-08-1996 Letter to the Registrar (Through) RLC Central

Ex.W15 22-05-2000 Award in No. 69/99 Hon'ble Tribunal held that his termination is illegal and no justified and that he is entitled to be reinstated in service with backwages and continuity in service

Ex. W16 23-02-2006 Order in WPNo. 858/2002 set aside the exparte orders in the I.D. No.484/2001

On theManagement's side

Ex. No. Date

Description

Nil

नई दिल्ली, 15 जुलाई , 2008

का. आ. 2215. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मद्रास टेलीफोन्स के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 484/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[फा. सं. एल-40012/ 163/1996- आई.आर. ( डी. यू. ) ]

सुरेन्द्रसिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 15th July, 2008 S.O. 2215.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 484/ 2001) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Channai , as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the management of Madras Telephones and their workmen, which was received by theCentral Government on 15-07-2008 .

[F. No. L-40012/163 / 1996-1R(DU ) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Tuesday, the 1st July, 2008

Present: K. JAYARAMAN, PresidingOfficer Industrial Dispute No. 484/2001

(In the matter ofthe dispute for adjudication under clause(d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub -section 2 (A) of Section 10ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Madras Telephones and their Workman)

BETWEEN

Sri R. Munirathinam

IParty/Petitioner

Vs.

The ChiefGeneral

II Party/Respondent Manager Madras

Telephones , Madras -600001 4510

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Appearance:

Sri J. Muthukumaran

For thePetitioner

FortheManagement

SriM.Govindaraaj

AWARD

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide its OrderNo.L-40012/ 163/96- IR(DU) dated 04-02-1998 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

permission was sought from the Government before terminating the service of the petitioner . Anyhow , the petitioner has worked more than 480 days in a continuous period of 24 Calendar months and is deemed to be a regular workman as per the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (GrantofPermanent Status to Workman) Act and, therefore , the order passed by the Respondent Authorities is illegal and void abinitio . Hence , he prays this Tribunal for reinstatement in service with full backwages and other consequential relief.

The schedule mentioned in that order is :

"Whether the action of the management of Madras Telephones , Madras - 1 in terminating the services of Sri R. Munirathinam Casual Labour w.e.f. 14-04-1995 is justified or not? If not justified to what relief he is entitled?

2.After the receipt of the Industrial Dispute , the Tamil Nadu Industrial Tribunal has numbered as I D 30/98 and issued notices to both parties . Both parties entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement respectively. After this constitution of Central Government Industrial Tribunal , the said ID was transferred to this Tribunal and renumbered as 484/2001.

3.The allegations in the Claim Statement are briefly asfollows

4. As against this , the Respondent in his Counter Statement contended that only due to change in technology and other administrative exigencies the Canteen of the Respondent at present caters to only 700 persons . Therefore , the workload of the Canteen has actually reduced . Due to reduced volume of work , a decision was taken by the authorities to disengage the petitioner and only when there is exigencies like heavy absenteeism and specific extra works to be undertaken , persons were engaged for short duration on payment from Canteen proceeds on contract basis . As such , now the strength of the Canteen staff is commensurate with the workload . The petitioner was paid only from the Canteen proceeds and Welfare Subsidy. Therefore, the contention that he should be considered as a Casual Labourer is incorrect . Since the petitioner was not engaged on muster roll and paid from the departmental funds , the question of treating him on par with Casual Labourer of the department does not arise . It is not correct to say that the petitioner has completed 480 days ofcontinuous work during 24 calendar months , hence , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs .

5.At the first instance since the petitioner remained absent, he was called exparte and the petition filed by the petitioner to set aside the exparte order was dismissed by thisTribunal . When the matter was considered by the High Court in Writ Petition , the order passed by this Tribunal has been set aside and the matter was remanded to this Tribunal again to dispose of the matter on merits . After this remand , the petitioner and Respondent were not appeared for several hearings . After a long lapse oftime, the petitioner has filed Proof of Affidavit and the Respondent has never appeared before this Court to cross- examine the petitioner . Therefore , this Tribunal has no other option except to dispose of the matter exparte . Again the Respondent has filed an application to set aside the exparte order in which a conditional order was passed by this Tribunal but even after several hearings , the Respondent neither fulfilled the conditions nor appeared before this Court. Therefore , the petition to set aside the exparte order wasdismissed and orders was passed .

6. Points for consideration are :

( 1) Whether the action of the Respondent Management in terminating the services of the petitioner isjustified?

(2) To what relief the petitioner is entitled?

Point No. 1

The petitioner was employed as a Wash Boy in the Departmental Canteen ofthe Respondent in its Telephone Exchange at Flower Bazar , NSC Bose Road , Chennai , The petitioner was engaged from 1988 continuously . The Canteen is run round the clock in three shifts and caters to nearly 1,500 employees in the office. There are 21 permanent employees and 8 Casual Labourers including the petitioner . Pursuant to the judgement of the Supreme Court , the Department of Personnel , Public Grievances and Pension issuedan OMdated 29-01-1992 stating that the employees ofthe non -statutory departmental/cooperative canteen/ Tiffinrooms located in Central Governinent Office should be treated as Govt . servants w.e.f. 1-10-1991 , the Casual Labourers recruited prior to 30-03-1985 were regularized in terms ofCasual Labourers ( Grant of Temporary Status and RegulRegularizations) Scheme, 1989. While so , the Respondent issued a notice dated 15-03-1995 under Section - 25 ( F ) of the IDAct and further proposed to disengage the petitioner from 14-04-1995 on account ofbeing no work in the Canteen. The petitioner challenged the above retrenchment notice before the Central Administrative Tribunal ( CAT) in OA No. 446/95 but the CAT has disposed of the matter stating the petitioner should approach the forum available under the IDAct . Thereafter, the petitioner raised a dispute before the labour authorities since the conciliation is not feasible , the matter was referred to this Tribunal . The allegation in the retrenchment notice that there is no work in the Canteen isfalse one. Even today, the Respondent Management is engagingworkers on contract basis for its day to day work. One Smt .K. Rajalakshmi , Smt . S. Ranjini , Sri Selvakumar were employed from 14-04-1995 to 10-08-1996 on contract basis . Therefore , it is false to say that there is no work in this Canteen . The action of the Respondent Management is contrary to Section - 25 ( N) also in as much as no

7. The petitioner in his Proof of Affidavit alleged what are all he stated in the Claim Statement . Further , he alleged

14 [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

from the year 1988 to 1994 , he served 287 days, 345 days , 339 days , 324 days, 336 days , 290 days and 360 days respectively . The Senior Assistant Traffic Superintendent has also given a certificate to that effect . Since he has served from 1988 , he argued that he should have been absorbed as a permanent employee from 01-10-1991 as per the Govt. of India Memorandum dated 29-01-1992 . On the other hand when doing this , the Respondent Management has issued a notice dated 15-03-1995 under Section- 25 ( F) of the ID Act and disengaged him. The reason mentioned in the retrenchment notice is that there is no work in the Canteen and, therefore , they have disengaged him . But. even after that the Respondent Management has engaged labourers on short term basis which is illegal . One Mr. Edward was working as a Casual Labourer (Cleaner) from 01-01-1991 and his services were terminated from 20-01-1995 . He filed a Claim Petition before the Tribunal and the Tribunal has passed an award on 22-05-2000 in his favour . Similarly, one Rathinam and B. Soundaranan , Casual Labourers have also raised disputes and awards were passed in their favour . In ID 66 and 70/98 , the petitioners filed all the awards passed by the Tamil Nadu Industrial Tribunal to substantiate his claim and he prays a similar award be passed in his favour and he marked the copy of the certificate issue by the first Respondent official as Ex.W1 , copy ofthe letter sent to RLC as Ex . W2 , copy ofthe letter sent by the Respondent Management to him as Ex . W3 . The order passed by the Respondent Authorities dated 15-03-1995 as Ex. W4 , the copy of the order passed by the CAT as Ex . W5 and the minutes ofjoint discussion between the Management and the workman as Ex . W6 and Ex.W8 and the copy of the letter from the Management to the Registrar to the Regional Commissioner of Labour as Ex.W7 and he marked the copy ofthe award in ID 69/99 as Ex. W9.

8. As against this , though the Respondent filed a Counter Statement , he has not appeared before this Tribunal to dispute the claim of the petitioner . Since the petitioner has established that he has worked more than 240 days in acontinuous period of 12 months and since the Respondent has not established that there is no work in the Canteen as alleged by them in the Counter Statement, I am inclined to accept the contention of the petitioner that the retrenchment order passed by the Respondent Authorities is not justified. Hence , 1 find the point in favour of the petitioner.

Point No. 2

9. In view of my foregoing findings , I find the petitioner is entitled to the relief of reinstatement and backwages with other consequential benefits .

10. Thus the reference is disposed of accordingly .

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 1st July, 2008 )

K. JAYARAMAN, Presiding Officer Witness Examined:

None

Forthe 1st Party/Petitioner :

None

For the IInd Party/Management :

4511

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

Documents Marked: On the Petitioner's side

Ex. No. Date .

Description

Ex.Wil

Certificate issued by the Madras Telephones

Ex.W2

Ex.W3 13-01-1994

Letter from the petitioner to the Regional Commissioner of Labour Letter from the petitioner to the Management

Ex.W4 15-03-1995 Order proposing the disengagement of the petitioner Order of the Central

Ex.W5 25-04-1995

Ex.W6 28-06-1996

Administrative Tribunal Minutes of Joint discussion between the Management and the workmen

Ex.W7 23-08-1996 Letter from the Management to the Registrar through the Regional Commissioner of Labour Ex, W8 26-08-1996

ExW10 22-05-2000

Minutes of Joint Discussion Award in No. 69/99 Hon'ble Tribunal held that his termination is illegal and not justified and that he is entitled to be reinstated in service with backwages and continuity of service

Ex.W11 23-02-2006 Order in WP No. 858/2002 set aside the exparte orders in the ID No. 483/2001

On the Management's side

Ex. No. Date

Description

Nil

नई दिल्ली, 15 जुलाई , 2008

का. आ. 2216. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार नेशनल शुगर इंस्टिटयूट् के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रमःन्यायालय कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 90/86 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[फा.सं. एल-42011/ 13/ 85 - डी- II (बी ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 15th July, 2008 S.O. 2216. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 90/86) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour Court Kanpur , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of National Sugar Institute and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 15-07-2008.

[F.No. L-42011 /13/ 85 - D- II (B) ]

SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer 4512

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ] ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRIR GSHUKLA PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT, KANPUR

Industrial Dispute No.90 of 1986

Between

The President

Karamchari Sangh , National Sugar Institute, Kalyanpur, Kanpur

And

The Director , National Sugar Institute Kaiyanpur, Kanpur.

AWARD

1. Central Government , MOL, New Delhi , vide its notification no.L-42011 ( 13 ) 85 - D II -B dated 29th May, 1986 , has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal-

Whether the action of the management ofNational Sugar Institute Kalyanpur Kanpur in not giving regular appointment to 78 casual workers listed in the Annexure to the Schedule is legal and justified? Ifnot what reliefthe Workmen concerned are entitled to?"

1947. It is also pleaded that in the year 1985 certain posts of group cadres were vacant as is evident from the circular No.Est. 19( 11 )66-11 /1978-93 dated 29-08-85 and the circular No.Estt. 12(3 )/62/ 1698-703 dated 16-08-85 issued under the signature of Sri PP Guha , Sr. Administrative Officer NSI Kanpur. It has also been alleged that in a meeting held on May 12, 1975, the then Director of National Sugar Institute agreed to issue regular appointment letters to these workmen as regular employees with effect from retrospective dates so as to bring uniformity in pay , service conditions and to provide monitory and non monitory benefits to a workmen similar to other employees working as regular and permanent employees , employed to do identical work on the equivalent posts in according with established laws of the land . Based on above meeting a settlement dated 29-4-77 had been arrived at between the employers representatives and the Trade Union named as Karamchari Sangh , Rashtriya Sarkara Sansthan Kanpur contents of which are self explanatory which has been marked as Annexure F to the claim petition . Union has further pleaded that in view of continuous unfair labour practice on issues in question and breach of trust in not honouring the settlement , the employees of the said industry agitated peacefully to draw the attention of the concerned management which concluded with another settlement on 12-05-83 . Apart from the above facts it has also been pleaded that majority of the workmen in question belong to backward class , schedule caste and scheduled tribes and there are constitutional laws for upliftment of these classes of employed persons . On the basis of above pleadings it has been prayed that 78 workmen be regularized from the date they joined the institute and conformity in the service be awarded with equal pay and allowance at par with regular and permanent employees of the employers of category to which these 78 workmen belongs . They be also granted seniority from the date of entry in the employment of the opposite party.

2. The case in short as set up by the union on behalf ofthe workers mentioned in the reference order is that the employers have been notifying certain vacancies from time to time in Group C and group D posts to which the named 78 workmen belong and also has been calling candidates registered in the Employment Exchange for fresh appointments even during the same period when the already employedworkers were called as casual workers , therefore , the employers have violate Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India which provides the lawful rights of appointment, seniority, regularization , equal pay for equal work and equal service conditions as of other regular and permanent co -employees in similar cadre in the said industry to the 78 named workmen who are guarded by these constitutional provisions . The employers as such have acted Ilegally and unjustified not giving regular appointment to the named 78 workmen in the given circumstances .It is the further case of the union that the named 78 workmen were appointed against permanent vacantposts within daily job requirement respectively and theirrespective work being of permanent nature , which is in existence even today. It was also told to workmen that their regular formal appointment letters would be issued and served in due course . However , the promised formal appointment letter have not been Issued to them because of unfair labour practice indulged in by the concerned management of the industry such actions of the said employers are illegal and bad in the eye of law . It has further pleaded that workmen in question have put in continuous service of over 240 days with aforesaid employers as required under section 25B of the Industrial Disputes Act, '

3. The opposite party contested the claim ofthe union on variety of grounds , inter alia, alleging therein that the opposite party is not an Industry as defined under section 2(j ) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, it has also been pleaded that the Director of the Institute is not an employer inas much as it exercises the delegated authority for and on behalf of the Union of India . It is also pleaded that it is in correctto plead by the union that all the 78 workmen have at any point of time had been engaged and employed for the work ofthe opposite party. Petitioner No.27 to 38 ( inclusively) are employed on daily basis by the students residing in the hostel of the Institute and they have not been paid by the institute. They rendered their services to the hostel according to the choice of the students . None of the petitioners much less petitioner No.27 to 38 were avere appointed against permanent vacant post in the Institute and petitioner No. 1 to 26 and 39 to 78 have been engaged from to time on daily wages as and when the exigencies of work so required . The petitioners who are daily wage employee are not entitled to regular appointments even though they may have completed 240 days of continuous service in one calendar year. It is also pleaded that according to OM dated 11-10-1983 Annexure - 3 to the reply issued by the Department of Personnel does

14 4513 [ भाग 11-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

not envisage the automatic regular appointment of persons engaged on daily wage basis . All the casual employees cannot be straightway appointed on a regular basis . The DepartmentofPersonnel has been issuing instructions from time to time regarding the concessions relating to age limit etc. for absorption of casual employees against Group ' D' posts. Only 66 persons are working as daily rate employees and not 78 persons as alleged by the Union . As per instructions received from the Ministry all group ' D ' posts are required to be filled up only by appointing the eligible daily wage employees within the parameters laid down by the Department ofPersonnel . Management has also denied the fact that any settlement had ever been reached between the Sangh and the opposite party on the ground that only a discussion on various problems were held and that the same would not construed as a settlement as claimed by the Sangh . Management has also denied ofhaving committed any unfair labour practice. Lastly it has been pleaded by the management that the Institute is a subordinate office of the Government ofIndia and is governed by the staffing pattern forGovernment offices and the Institute is maintained from public funds and the staff required for rendering the service is to be sanctioned according to norms prescribed by the Government on the basis of studies conducted by Staff Inspection Unit.

4. The Sangh has also filed rejoinder against the written reply filed by the opposite party but nothing new has been pleaded therein except reiterating the facts already pleaded by them in their claim petition .

1987 be kept stayed in the light of the order of the Hon'ble HighCourt in Civil Misc Writ Petition No. 13555 of 87..The tribunal while disposing of the said application of the management stayed the proceedings of both the industrial dispute cases i.e. Industrial Dispute No. 156 of 1987 and I. D. No. 90 of1986 on the ground that the matter involved in both the cases are substantially the same and similar and cannot be separated from each other in view of the terms ofreference order referred by Government of India in Industrial Dispute No. 90 of 86 , by means of its order dated 21-02-90 . This application of the opposite party dated 18-10-1989 was allowed by my learned predecessor vide order dated 21-02-90 , and the proceedings in both the I.D Case No.153 of 87 and 90 of 1986 were stayed in the light of the orders ofthe Hon'ble High Court . It is also clear from the record of the case that the Hon'ble Court vide its final order has finally disposed of the writ petition No. 13555 of 1988 copy ofwhich was filed by means ofapplication moved on behalf of the Vice President of the Sangh . Thereafter registered notices to the contesting parties were issued by the tribunal on 20-06-2006 , fixing 02-08-2006 as date of hearing in the case . From the proceedings of the case it is quite clear that the opposite party stands debarred from evidence and the case was reserved for arguments . Managements application to recall the order of the tribunal debarring the management from adducing their evidence also stands rejected vide order dated 29-11-06 , and since the tenure of my learned predecessor expired on 20th January , 2007 , proceedings in the case remained in abeyance. After the charge of the post of Presiding Officer was resumed further proceedings took place in the case and final arguments in the case were heard on 30-11-07 , and the case was reserved for its award .

5. After exchange of pleadings between the parties whereas the union has filed documentary evidence marked. as Ext . W- J to Ext. W - 39, per list paper No. 7/1 to 7/44, по documentary evidence has been filed by the opposite party in support of their claim.

9. I have heard the arguments of the contesting parties at length and have also gone through the records and material available of the file carefully.

6. The management has vehemently raised and argued the point that the opposite party is not an industry and ultimately by a detailed order the tribunal vide its order dated30-11-1987 , has answered the issue in favour of the workmen holding that the management is an Industry.

10. At the outset it may be pointed out that after the examination of chief of the management witnesses was over the case was adjourned for their cross examination but before it could be concluded the proceedings of the case were stayed under the orders of the Hon'ble High Court . After the writ petition was finally decided by the Hon'ble High Court, Allahabad, the proceedings of the case were commenced and the case was fixed for evidence of the parties . But on the date of evidence management witnesses did not turn up hence they were debarred and the case was fixed for arguments . Thus it is quite obvious that there is no evidence from the side of the management in support of their assertion, therefore, in view of above, the examination in chief of the witnesses of the management is of no help to them as the witnesses were never put in the witness box for their cross examination from the side ofthe workmen .

7. That after the order dated 30-11-1987 , the workers have filed their respective affidavit in the shape ofevidence insupport ofthe claim and on 04-05-89 two witnesses ofthe union were cross examined at the hands of the opposite party and date 20-06-89 was fixed for the cross examination ofthe remaining workers witnesses when the union only after producing two witnesses for cross examination at the hands of the management closed their evidence on 20-06-89. Thereafter the management on 25-08-89 filed affidavit evidence in the shape of affidavit copy of which was given to the other side and also moved adjournment application which was allowed by the tribunal and a date as 25-08-89 was fixed for further hearing in the case . In the mean time the cross examination of the management witness couldbe concluded they went before the Hon'ble High Court and obtained stay against the proceedings of the case.

11. It has vehemently been argued by the authorized representative for the workmen in the light of reference order that the workers involved were appointed against permanent and vacant post in the category class D since last several years and although they were given assurance several times that they will be absorbed very shortly but in spite of the best efforts made by the workmen either individually or collectively the management as per mal- 8. Record of the case reveals that the opposite party in Industrial Dispute No. 153 of 1987 under section 33 -A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 on 18-10-89 moved an application that the proceedings in I. D. Case No. 153 of 4514

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[ PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

14. Tribunal has given anxious consideration to the respective arguments advanced by the contesting parties on the point in the light of the circular dated 13-10-83 (supra).

practice prevalent failed to absorb all of them on regular basis. It has also been argued that they were recruited during the period 1963 to 1976 , and performed their duties continuously for more than 240 days each year and their work and performance were also more than satisfactory. The representative for the workmen has also argued that various persons inducted in the services of the opposite party after their appointments has been given regular and permanent status and were also given prescribed pay scale togetherwith admissible allowances ignoring the legitimate claim of the workmen of granting them regular and permanent status in their respective posts and pay and allowances of the post which have been occupied bythem.

:

15. It has not been disputed by the management that the workers involved in the reference have not been appointed by them during the period 1963 to 1976 as claimed bythe workmen. I have gone through the provisions ofthe circular dated 13-10-1983 ( supra) , and find that the Government of India . New Delhi , through Department of Personnel and Administrative Reform has communicated its decision on the point that it has been experienced that in certain cases casual employees , although recruited through employment exchanges , had already crossed the upper age limit prescribed for appointment to Group "D " post , with the result , that the facility for regularization cannot be made available to them and in view of the fact thatthey belong to the economically weaker section of the society and with view to avoid undue hardship to them, it has been decided that each of the casual employees as were recruited in various ministries / departments and their attached subordinate offices before 21-3-79 may be considered for regularization in group " D" posts even though they may have crossed the age limit prescribed for the post provided they are otherwise eligible for regularization.

12.On the contrary it has been argued on behalf of themanagement that all the workmen were daily wager on casual basis and there is no regular or permanent post therefore neither they cannot be given regular and permanent status nor can be absorbed and nor can be granted equal pay for equal work. It has also been argued bythe representative for the management that on 11-07-88 a lease deed was entered into between the Ministry of Food and Supply, New Delhi , of which Opposite party is subordinate office and Indian Institute of Puise and Research, a body of Indian Council of Agriculture Research , New Delhi , and according to the term of lease agreement some ofthe land under the use and control of the opposite partywas transferred for research work to Indian Institute ofPulse Research , Kanpur , and workers working over the said land also stood transferred automatically to Indian Institute of Pulse Research , Kanpur , and thereby the opposite party ceased to have any control or supervision against the working of the twenty workers and thereby the opposite party had never terminated the services of the twenty workmen working on the said land which was subsequently transferred to the Indian Institute of Pulse Research , Kanpur .

16. Therefore from the above provisions of the circular dated 13-10-83 , it is quite obvious that the provisions ofthe circular are unilaterally binding upon the ministries/ departments , attached and subordinate offices of the Government of India . It is also clear from the circular that it has been decided by the Government to regularize the services of all such casual employees recruited through employment exchange even though they have crossed the ' maximum age prescribed for the post and lastly that a cutoff date 21-03-79 has been prescribed therein clearly indicating that the provisions ofthe circular shall be applicable only on such casual employees who were appointed before 21-03-79 . The management in its entire written statement has not disputed the respective date of appointment of the workers involved in the case which are admittedly much before 21-03-79 , when all the workers are alleged to have worked with the opposite party in the capacity as claimedby them that is casual basis . In all fairness , equity justice and fair play, the opposite party ipso- facto would have taken steps to ensure regularization of the services of the workers by initiating suitable steps and finding out the eligibility zone of the concern workers for granting them the benefits ofthe circular or the decision of the Government of India having regard to their weaker socio - economic conditions. The opposite party has never denied the existence of the circular (supra) which was of binding nature on them . The fact that the workers have been appointed by the opposite party well established from the oral evidence led by them before the tribunal and against it there is no evidence on record from the side of the management . Therefore, from the sole evidence of the workers and in the light of the fact all of them have been appointed much before the cutoff date i.e. 21-3-79 by the opposite party , it is quite clear that the cases of all the workers involved in the case are covered by the 13. In support of his arguments pin point attention of the tribunal has been drawn by the authorized representative for the workmen towards Office Memorandum No. 49014/7/83 -Estt . (C) dated 13th October , 1983 issued by Ministry of Home Affairs , New Delhi , which is on the subject of Regularization of Casual employee in Group "D" Posts , Annexure - A ( Paper No. 4/11 ) to the written statement filed by the opposite party and this clearly provides method of recruitment , educational qualification , age limit and eligibility criteria . It further indicates that it was brought to the notice of the department that in certain cases casual employees , although recruited through employment exchanges had already crossed the upper age limitprescribed for appointment to group " D " post , with the result that the facility for regularization cannot be made available to them . In view ofthe fact that the casual workers belong to the economically weaker section of the society and with viewto avoid undue hardship to them it has been decided that each ofthe casual einployees as were recruited in various Ministries /departments and their attached subordinate office before 21-3-79 , may be considered for regularization in group "D " posts even though they may have crossed the age limit prescribed for the post provided theyare otherwise eligible for regularization .

[भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

provisions of the circular and they should have been regularized against their respective posts by the opposite party soon after receipt of the circular by initiating suitable steps in this regard in the light of the guidelines given therein . The approach of the opposite party in keeping them as casual employees ignoring the statutory provisions ofthe circular dated 21-03-79 , cannot be appreciated at and can be well covered under the provisions of Unfair Labour Practice as defined under section 2 (ra) of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , and that would also attract the provisions ofArticle 23 of the Constitution of India. Had theseworkers been absorbed in the service ofthe opposite party in the year 1979 or latest by 1980 by invoking the provisions of the circular , question of raising the present dispute by the workers would have never arisen and the future ofthe poor workers could have been securedby the opposite party itself when the poor workers could have taken the taste of the fruits in the shape of circular dated 21-03-79 . But from the facts and circumstances ofthe case it appears that some ego on some point of the competent authorities of the opposite party became as a hurdle in implementing the decision of the Government of India in just and fair manner for the reasons best known with the result that they invited themselves into unnecessarily litigation up to the stage of Hon'ble High Court at the cost ofGovernment exchequer which cannot be appreciated at all under any circumstances whatsoever.

17. There is also no denying about the fact that there is no evidence on record from the side of the management on the point. Therefore it stands established by the evidence of the workmen they are continuously working from the appointed date mentioned against their name in the list enclosed with the reference order.

18. The arguments advanced by the management is neither supported by any documentary evidence nor by any oral evidence , therefore , they simply remains arguments in vain and they are not acceptable to the tribunal for the simple reason that the case oftwenty workers whose services are alleged to have been automatically stood transferred as a resultant effect of the lease deed dated 11-07-88 entered into the Ministry of Home Affairs , New Delhi , and Indian Council of Agriculture Research, New Delhi , by means of which certain land ofthe opposite party over which these twenty workers were working had been transferred squarely falls outside the scope and ambit of theleasedeeddated 11-07-88, in the light of the provisions ofcircular dated 13-10-83 . Further had the opposite party been quite fair in their action the services of these twenty workersalleged to have been transferred to Pulse Research Institute, Kanpur, would have been regularized much before entering into the alleged lease agreement dated 11-07-88 , therefore, the opposite party cannot be allowed to advance arguments that the opposite party had never terminated the services ofthe twenty workers involved in the case as question of termination of their services in the facts and circumstances of the case does not arise at all. Therefore, under these circumstances of the case tribunal is not at all inclined to accept the case of the opposite party management that the twenty workers stood automatically transferred in the light of the lease agreement to Indian Institute of Pulse Research, Kanpur, and that the opposite party had never terminated their services . It is also clear 2823 G1 /08-22

4515

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

that the workers involved in the case have been able to substantiate their claim by adducing overwhelming evidence . Therefore the case of the workers involved in the case are believed and it is held that the opposite party have played unfair labour practice by continuing them to serve as daily/ casual basis for years together ignoring the statutory provisions of the circular dated 13-10-83 for yearstogether.

19.Now in the light ofthe arguments and established fact that the workers involved in the case have continued inthe employment of the opposite parpposite party for years together, itwill be seen ifthe workers involved in the case are entitled for their regularization on their respective posts in Group D and also that as to whether or list attached with the reference order are entitled for the regularization at the post at which they had worked under the opposite party.

21. Tribunal is further fortified with the law laid down bythe Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of U.P. State Electricity Board vs. Pooran Chandra Pandey & others , JT2007 (12) SC 175, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India after distinguishing the law laid down in the leading case of Smt . Uma Devi has categorically held as under:

"Wehave to read Uma Devi's Case ( JT 2006 (4 ) SC 420) in conformity with Article 14 ofthe Constitution , and we cannot read it in a manner which will make it in conflict with Article 14. The Constitution is the supreme law ofthe land and any judgment, not even the Supreme Court can violate Constitution ." 22. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the said decision has further observed

" In the present case many of the writ petitioners have been working from 1985 i.e. they have put in about 22 years service and it will surely not be reasonable if their claim for regularization is denied even after such a long period of service . Hence apart from discrimination Article 14 of the Constitution will also be violated on the grounds of arbitrariness and unreasonableness if employees who have put in such a long service are denied the benefit of regularization................. "

23. The facts and circumstances of the case in hand are pari -materia with the facts and circumstances of the case cited above, hence the law propounded by the Hon'ble Supreme Court apply with full swing , therefore the workers ofthe instant case cannot be denied for their regularization in the service of the opposite party.

24. It is therefore held that for the reasons discussed above, it is held that the action of the management of National Sugar Institute, Kalyanpur , Kanpur , in not giving regular appointment to 78 Casual Workers listed in the Annexure to the schedule is neither legal nor justified. Consequently it is further heid that they are entitled to be regularized in the service of the opposite party .

25. Reference is answered accordingly in favour of the workmen and against the opposite party.

R. G SHUKLA, PresidingOfficer 4516

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9, 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] नई दिल्ली , 15 जुलाई , 2008

1 का. आ. 2217.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल रिसर्च इंस्टीट्यूट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 1 , चण्डीगढ़ , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 46/96) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

his services . The services of the workman have been terminated without notice and compensation in violation of the provisions of Section 25 f and 25 n of the Act of 1947 , without just and reasonable cause as part of unfair labour practices adopted by the management of the respondent institute . The petitioner just after the termination of his services , made number of representations. He made final representation on 27-3-1992 , which was rejected by the Administrative Officer on 3-12- 1992 , which comes to his notice on 4-3-1994 . Left no alternative , he raised a demand notice under Section 2 A of the Act of 1947 , and on failure of conciliation proceedings . the present reference was referred by the Central Government to this tribunal for judicial adjudication .

[सं. एल -42012/ 145/95- आई.आर. (डी. यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 15h July, 2008

The management of respondent has challenged the claim ofthe workman - petitioner on 3 folds :-

(a) That Central Govt . Research Institute is not an industry and the dispute between the petitioner workman and the respondent is not the industrial dispute.

S.Q. 2217. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 46/96) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court No. I Chandigarh , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Research Institute and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 15-07-2008 .

(b) That the workman petitioner has not completed 240 daysofwork continuously , therefore , is not entitled for the protection of the Industrial Disputes Act .

(c) That the services of the petitioner were terminated because he himself abandoned the service .

[ No. L- 42012/ 145 / 95 - IR( DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, -I CHANDIGARH .

Case No. I. D. 46/96

Sri Fakir Chand S / o Sri Mangat Ram , Village Chausan , Post Office-Kasauli ,Distt. - Solan

.Applicant

Itisalso stated in written statement that the petitioner absented himself from duty w.e.f. 5-6-1985 , and was continuous absent for over six months which proved that hewas not willing to serve as casual labour . In addition to the above spell of absence , he had absented himself from 4-2-85 to 16-2-85 , 19-3-85 to 20-3-85 , 20-4-85 to 26-4-85 and on 3-6-85 . The services of petitioner were terininated w.e.f. 15-6-85 , but his first representation for taking him back in sercvice as daily labour was not received immediately but on 9-4-91 after 5 years , 9 months and 24 days , from the date of his termination.

Versus

TheDirector , Central Research Institute , Kasauli , Distt.- Solan.

Respondent

APPEARANCES

: Sri J. C. Bhardwaj

: Sri Sanjeev Sharma

Forthe workman For the Management

AWARD

!

Passed on : 9-7-08

Central Govt . vide notification No. L - 42012/45/95- IR( D.U. ) dated 24-4-1996 , referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for judicial adjudication :-

"Whether the action of the Director , Central Research Institute, Kasauli in terminating the services of Sri Fakir Chand is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

This Tribunal was kind enough to decide this reference vide award dated 1-4-02 . In the award , this Tribunal held that the workman - petitioner has undisputedly worked for more than 240 days , and his services were terminated without any notice against the provisions of Industrial.Disputes Act. He is entitled for the sercice without the benefit of back wages . In the award this Tribunal on page no . 4 , also held that it is not proved by the workmen that he had given representation to the management before the year 1991 and thus , it can be said that he did not report to the management for this long period of 5 years , 9 months and 24 days . This award was challenged by the management of respondent before Hon'ble Himachal Pradesh High Court at Shimla . Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla, vide order , dated April 20 , 2007, set aside the award and directed this Tribunal to dispose of this reference within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order afteraffording adequate opportunities to the parties .

The facts of the case as are clear from the statement of claim and the written statement are that the workman worked with the management - respondent from 19-12-1983 till his termination at the minimum pay scale and was paid monthly. He was appointed on permanent vacancy. His services were illegally terminated on 16-6-1985 by the Accounts Officer who was not competent to terminated

Hon'ble the High Court vide order , dated 20-4-2007 directed this Tribunal to dispose of this reference afresh considering two facts namely whether the workman- petitioner abandoned the service and the management- respondent terminated his services as abandoned ? And 4517 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/श्रावण 18 , 1930

whether the respondent, Central Research Institute, comes within the definition of industry ?

Legislature steps in with a comprehensive bill to clear up the fog and remove the doubts and set at rest once for all the controversywhich crops up from time to time in relation to the meaning ofthe aforesaid term rendering it necessary for larger Benches of this Court to be constituted which are driven to the necessity of evolving a working formula to cover particular cases .

First of all , I am discussing whether the Central Research Institute, the respondent comes within the definition of industry. The term " industry" has been defined in Section 2 (j ), of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to mean any business , trade , undertaking , manufacture or calling or employers and includes any calling , services , employment , handicraft , or industrial occupation or avocation ofworkmen .

In a landmark judgment Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. Rajappa , and others published in (1978), 2 Supreme Court cases 313 , 7 Judges Bench of Hon'ble Apex Court has defined the word " industry ". As per the above mentioned verdict of the Apex Court industry as defined in Sub - section (j ) of Section 2 has a wideimport.

(a) Where there is ( i ) systematic activity, ( ii ) organized by co- operation between employer and employee (the direct and substantial element is chimerical ) , and ( iii ) for the production and/or distribution of goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants andandwishes (not spiritual or religious but inclusive of materials things orservices geared to celestial bliss ) , prima facie , there is an industry in the enterprise.

(b) Absence of profit motive or gainful objective is irrelevant , be the venture in the public, joint, private or other sector .

(c) The true focus is functional and the decisive test is the nature of the activity with special emphasis on the employer-employee relations .

(d) If the organization is a trade or business it does not cease to be one because of philanthropy animating the undertaking.

Thus , no hard and fast rule regarding the definition of industry can be laid down. If any organization fulfilled the triple tests mentioned above they are ineluded in the terms of the industry . Thus , the tribunal has to look into the matter about the activities of the organization , organized cooperation between the employer and the employee and whether there is the production and/ or distribution of goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes? If above mentioned three triple tests are fulfilled the organization is an industry. The mangement of respondent has alleged that Central Research Institute is not an industry . The burden of proof lies on the respondent that the respondent is not fulfilling the triple test . In affidavit of Sri R.B.S Negi filed on behalf of the management, in para no . I it is specifically mentioned that the office of the respondent is the subordinate office of the Government of India and is engaged in the scientific research . The main functions of the respondent office are production of vaccines , Sera and Immunobiologicals and reseach activites in the field . As per the triple tests laid downbyHon'ble the Apex Court in Bangalore Water Supply case (supra) , if there is any production/distribution of goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes and such organization has systematic activity and organized by corporation between employer and employee , the organization will be an industry. All the three tests in the instant case are fulfilled. there is the production of vaccines , Sera and Immunobiologicals to satisfy human wants and wishes . Central Research Institue is having the systematic activities with organized corporation between employer and employee . Thus as per the difinition given by the Hon'ble the Apex Court in Bangalore Water Supply case(supra) , the Central Research institute comes within the definition of industry.

Thus, the test mentioned in para no. 140, of the said judgment is necessary to qualify any institution to be an industy. Regarding the research institutions Hon'ble Apex Court in the vary judgment has held that the professions, clubs , educational institutions , co - operatives , research institutions , charitable projects and other kindred adventures, if they fulfill the triple tests , cannot be exempted from the scope of Section 2(j ) . The representation category of professions, clubs , co- operatives , and even gurukulas and little research laboratories may qualify for exemption , if in simple ventures , substantially and going by dominant nature criteria substantially, no employees are entertained , but in minimal matter , marginal employees are hired without destroying the non-employee character of the unit. It has also held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the said judgment that sovereign functions strictly understood alone qualified exemption, not the welfare activites or economic adventures undertaken by Government or statutory bodies . Even in departments discharging sovereign functions , if there are units which are industries and they are substantially sevegral thenthey can be consider to come within Section 2 (j ) .

The next question for the determination of this Tribunal is whether the services of the workman were terminated as abandoned by the workman himself? There are allegations and counter allegations in the pleadings of the parties .It is too in the evidence ofthe parties . Workman Fakir Chand claimed that his services were terminated on 16-6-85 illegally wheras, the management of the respondent claimed that the petitioner absented himself from the duty w.e.f. 5-6-85 onward till the date of the order of his termination. He was terminated w.e.f. 15-6-85 . It is undisputed that the petitioner workman had worked under the management of respondent. After his termination , he made a representation on 9-4-91, after 5 years , 9 months and 24 daysfrom the date of termination. This gave an opportunity to the management to agitate on the ground that the petitioner - workman absented himself and abandoned the services : The services of any workman can be terminated in compliance of the rules governing him. 1 have asked the management to supply the copy of concern rules which are on- record . Management has filed the copy In the last of the judgment Hon'ble the Apex Court held that in view of the difficulty experienced by all ofus in defining the true denotation of the term " industry " and divergence of opinion in regard thereto -as has been the case with this Bench also - we think , it is high time that the 4518

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 /SRAVANA 18 , 1930

required . The Standing Orders in casual labour in Central Government Undertaking makes a distinction between the misconduct in which the notice is required for the termination of any workman and on his act for which no notice is required .

of Standing Orders for Casual Labour in Central Govt . Undertaking applicable to the workman and management of respondent . I have gone through the entire Standing Orders . S.O. 13 , is relating to the termination ofemployment, which reads as under :-

I have gone through the statement of workman Sri Fakir Chand . He has narrated on oath :-

S.O. (13): - No notice shall be necessary to terminate the employment of a casual workman but the service of a casusal workman shall not be terminated under S.O. 12 ( iii ) unless he has been given an opportunity of explaining the charges of misconduct alleged against him in the manner provided for in S.O. 12 ( iv) .

" I submit written application several times to the management for my re - engagement . I can submit the copy of these application . I have not brought copy today with me. I cannot tell the dates of those applications . I do not remember that in which month or year those applications were submitted by ine . I submitted those application to Administrative Officer . The applications were given by me to him by hand . No engagement was received by me".

The plain reading of this rule made it clear that no notice shall be necessary to terminate the employment of a casual worker. But , no casual labourer shall be terminated under S.O. 12( iii ) unless he has been given an opportunity of explaining the charges of misconduct alleged against him in the manner provided for in S.O. 12( iv) .

It shows that S.O. 13 regarding the termination of employment of casual workman contains two modes of terminating the employment of casual workman . The modes areas under :-

1. Termination without notice .

2. Termination with notice, with an opportunity of explaining the charges of misconduct.

The misconduct has been defined in S.O. 12 (iii ) which reads as under-

12 ( iii ) . The following acts and omissions shall constitute misconduct :-

(a) Wilful insubordination or disobedience , whether alone or in combination with others , to any lawful and reasonable order of a superior,

(b) Theft , fraud or dishonesty in connection with the employer's business or property,

(c) Wilful damage to or loss of employer's goods or property,

(d) Taking or giving bribes or any illegal gratification ,

(e) Habitual breach of any law applicable to the establishment;

(f) Riotous or disorderly behaviour during working hours at the establishment or any act subversive ordiscipline,

On the other hand the management has declined and has stated that no representation before 9-4-91 was received bythe management-respondent . It is the workman to prove that just after the termination order he moved the representations . The workman was examined on 4-6-2001 and thereafter, for 7 years he was having an opportunity to file the copies of those application which he moved or other relevant evidence relating their to as proof, but he failed. Thus , it is clear that the first representation he made to the management for his re -employment was on 9-4-91 after 5 years , 9 months and 24 days from the date of termination of his services . It was on the workman to prove the compelling circumstances to move the representation after 5 years , 9 months and 24 days but , no satisfactory explanation is given by the workman to move the representation abnormally late . The circumstances speak itself. The services of the workman were terminated from 16-6-85 as he absented himself from work . Wilful absent from the work is not included in the act of misconduct as defined in S.O. 12 (iii ) . Thus , the management has rightly terminated the service without notice as per the provisions ofS.O. 13 relating to the termination of employment . If the workman is coming after more than 5 years , of abnormal delay to the organization he must proved the compelling circumstances for coming so late . He has not shown it , even prima facie. Thus, this Tribunal has no hesitation to accept the version ofthe management respondent that the services ofthe workman were terminated as abandoned by himself.

(g) Habitual negligence or neglect ofwork,

(h) Frequent repetition of any act or omission for which a fine may be imposed to a maximum of two per cent ofthe wages in a month ,

May be the workman has compelled 240 days but , as stated earlier that the workman has abandoned his services without any cause . He is not entitled for the protection of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 .

( ) Striking work or inciting others to strike work in contravention of the provisions of any law , of rule having the force of law,

(i) Habitual late attendance ,

(4) Drunkenness ,

Thus, for the reasons mentioned above , I am answering this reference in positive that the action of the Director , Central Research Institute Kasauli in terminating the services of Sri Fakir Chand is legal and justified , and the workman is not entitled for any relief. Central Governmentbe informed. Cosign the record .

G.. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer (1) Distribution or exhibition of any newspaper , : handbills , pamphlet or posters without the previous sarnction of the manager of the establishment .

नई दिल्ली, 15 जुलाई , 2008

का. आ. 2218. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार केन्द्रीय भैंस अनुसंधान संस्थान के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों Long absent from the service is not include in S.O. 12(iii ) . Thus , long absent from service by any workman is an act which is not included as misconduct under S.O. 12 ( iii ) and for his termination on this ground as per S.O. 13 , relating to temination of employment , no notice is [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 1 , चण्डीगढ़, के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 155/93 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-07-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[फा.सं. एल-42012/146/92- आई.आर. (डी. यू. ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 15h July, 2008 S.O. 2218.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 155/ 93) ofCentral Government Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour CourtNo. I Chandigarh , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the management of Central Institute for Research of Buffaloes and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 15-07-2008 .

[F.No. L-42012/146/92- IR(DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT-1 CHANDIGARH .

Case I. D. No. 155/93

Sri Joginder Singh S/o Sh . Tarlok Singh Kaul P.O. Rajgarh .

Teh . Nabha, Patiala

4519

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

The memorandum dated 13-9-93 makes the job of this Tribunal very easy . Thus the first part of the reference that whether the action of the management of Central Institute for research on Buffaloes Nabha , in terminating the services of Shri Joginder Singh w.e.f. 17-8-90 is legal and justified is not to be discussed without any comment . This Tribunal has to discuss and determine to what relief is the workman entitled in view of memorandum dated 13-9-93 . Thus , after this settlement between the workman and the management of respondent , there is no occasion for this Tribunal to discuss the nature of termination and non-implementation of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act . This Tribunal will confine itself for the implementation of the memorandum dated 13-9-93 which is a settlement between the workman and the management of the respondent.

The memorandum reads as under :-

Thedaily paid labourers who had worked at the farm ofthis Institute but did not complete 240 days in the farm as and when there is work available . These persons as per memorandum of settlement under Section 12 (3 ) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 between workmen and the management of CIRB , Hisar before Asstt . Labour Commissioner, Chandigarh and Jammu . These persons shall be given preference to over other open market daily paid worker for casual and seasonal work . The workman shall be engaged for the available work subject to his /her efficiency ofwork . The following is the list as per seniority: - S. No.

Name and Address

Applicant

Versus

Director, Central Institute for Research on Buffalos . Nabha .

1. Shri Nirmal Singh S/ o Shri Pritam Singh Vill . Fategarh Channa, P.O. Gajewas Teh . Samana (Patiala) .

2. Shri Pala Singh. S/ o Shri Dalip Singh Vill . Bhore , P.O. Malewal , Teh . Nabha (Patiala)

Respondent

APPEARANCES

Fortheworkman

: Sri H. S. Bath

: Sri R. K. Sharma

For the Management

AWARD

Passed on: 8th July , 2008

Central Government vide notification no . L -42012 / 146/92- IR( D.U . ) dated 13-12-93 , referred the following dispute for the judicial adjudication :---

"Whether the action of the management of Central Institute for Research on Buffaloes Nabha in terminating the services of Shri Joginder Singh S / o Shri Trilok Singh Kaul w.e.f. 17-8-90 is legal and justified ? Ifnot, what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from what date ? "

Just before the reference, there was a settlement between 8 workmen including Shri Joginder Singh and the Management of the respondent on 13-9-93 . The memorandum of the settlement is on record. This memorandum is admitted to both of the parties . Learned counsel for the management has stated that in view of this memorandum , the reference became infructuous and liable to be returned tothe Central Government as such, whereas, learned counsel for the workmen has agitated it that this Tribunal has got power to adjudicate the matter relating to non- implementation of this memorandum dated 13-9-93.

3. Shri Nandu Ram S/o Shri Ram Jugan , Vill . Saluwal Bhatta , P.O. Rajgarh . Teh . Nabha ( Patiala).

4. Shri Gurmail Singh S/o Shri Ram Partap Singh , V&PO Rajgarh , Teh . Nabha (Patiala ) .

5. Shri Hukam Raj S/o Sh. Balbir Singh . Vill . Kaberi . P.O. Baurpur, Teh. Nabha (Patiala) .

6. Shri Ram Singh S/ o Sh . Jaspal Singh V & P.O . Rajgarh , Teh . Nabha (Patiala) .

7. Shri Joginder Singh S/o Sh: Tarlok Singh . Vill . Kaul , P.O. Rajgarh , Teh. Nabha ( Patiala).

8. Shri Amarjit Singh S/o Sh. Bhan Singh . Vill . Bazidpur, P.O. Rajgarh . Teh . Nabha (Patiala).

As per this memorandum, on the basis of the settlement under Section 12 (3 ) of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 between the workman and the management CRRB , Hisar, before Assistant Labour Commissioner, Chandigarh and Jammu , the persons named in the memorandum were to be given preference over other open market daily paid worker for casual and seasonal work .

Opportunity for adducing the evidence was given to the parties. Evidence is on record. I have heard learned counsels for the parties . Learned counsel for the workman has stated that if in implementation of the memorandum dated 13-9-93, the workman are given the work , they will not claim any back wages whatsoever . On the other hand, 4520

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] learned counsel for the management for respondent has argued that the respondent is not the industry and the dispute is not an industrial dispute and accordingly, this Tribunal has got no powers and jurisdiction to dispose of thispart ofthe reference . In this context , learned counsel has relied upon a judgement of the Apex Court in Physical Research Laboratory vs. K.G. Sharma reported as 1997 (3 ) , the RSJ Phase 215 , I have gone through the judgment relied bythe learned counsel for the management of respondent . In this judgment Hon'ble Apex Court, in Para No. 13 has heldthat-

Thus , the test mentioned in para no . 140 of the said judgment is necessary to qualify any institution to be an industry. Regarding the research institutions , Hon'ble Apex Court in the vary judgment has held that the professions , clubs, educational institutions , co - operatives , research institutions , charitable projects and other kindred adventures if they fulfill the triple tests , cannot be exempted from the scope of Section 2 (j ) . The representation category or professions , clubs , co - operatives , and even gurukulas and little research laboratories may qualify for exemption , if, in simple ventures , substantially and going by dominant nature criteria substantially, no employees are entertained , but in minimal matter, marginal employees are hired without destroying the non-employec character of the unit . It has also held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the said judgment thatsovereign functions strictly understood alone qualified exemption , not the welfare activities or economic adventures undertaken by Government or statutory bodies . Even in departments discharging sovereign functions , if there are units which are industries and they are substantially sevegral then they can be consider to come within Section 2(j) .

It is nobody's case that PRI is engaged in an activity which can be called business trade or manufacture . Neither fromthe nature of its organizations nor from the nature and character ofthe activity carried on by it, it can be said to be an' undertaking' analogous to business or trade . It is not gaged in a commercial industrial activity and it cannot be described as an economic venture or a commerical enterprise as it is not its object to produce and distribute services which would satisfy wants and needs of the consumer community . It is more an institution discharging governmental functions and a domestic enterprise than a commercial enterprise . We are , therefore , of the opinion thatPRL is not an industry even though it is carrying on the activity or research in a systematic manner with the help of its employees as it lacks that element which would make it an organization carrying on an activity which can be said to be analogous to the carrying on of a trade or business because it is not producing and distributing services which are intended or meant for satisfying human wants and needs as ordinarily understood.

In the last of the judgment Hon'ble life Apex Court held that in view of the difficulty experienced by all of us in defining the true denotation of the term " industry" and divergence of opinion in regard thereto as has been the case with this Bench alsowe think, it is high time that the Legislature steps in with a comprehensive bill to clear up the fog and remove the doubts and set at rest once for all the controversy which crops up from time to time in relation to the meaning of the aforesaid term rendering it necessary for larger Benches of this Court to be constituted which are driven to the necessity of evolving a working formula to cover particular cases.

On the basis of the above observation , Hon'ble the Apex Court has held that PRL is not an industry . Learned counsel for the management of respondent has argued thatCIRE is also carrying the research work like PRL and accordingly , is not an industry.

In a landmark judgment , Bangalore Water Supply and SewerageBoard Vs. Rajappa , and others published in (1978) , 2 Supreme Court cases 313 , 7 Judges Bench of Hon'ble Apex Court has defined the word " industry" . As per the above mentioned verdict of the Apex Court industry as defined in Sub - section ( J ) of Section 2 has a vide import .

Thus , no hard and fast rule regarding the definition of industry can be laid down . If any organization fulfills the triple test mentioned above are included in the terms of the industry . Thus , the tribunal has to look into the matter about the activities of the organization , organized corporation between the employer and the employce and whether there is the production and/ or distribution of goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes. If above mentioned three triple tests are fulfilled the organization is an industry .

1 (a) Where there is ( i) systematic activity , (ii ) organized by co - operation between employer and employee ( The direct and substantial element is chimerical ), and ( iii ) for the production and/or distribution of goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes (not spiritual or religious but inclusive of materials things orservices geared to celestial bliss ) , prima facie , there is an industry in the enterprise .

(b) Absence of profit motive or gainfut objective is irrelevant, be the venture in the public joint , private or other sector .

(c) The true focus is functional and the decisive test is the nature of the activity with special emphasis on the employer- employee relations .

From the perusal ofthe Affidavit of the management, it is clear that, the research work of CIRB is for the producing/ distributing of goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes . This fact that the activities of the respondent are not analogous to any trade or industry are to be proved by the respondent management . The respondent management has not clearly mentioned its functioning. Thus , in the absence of the functioning of the respondent , it is open for this Court to hold that management has failed to prove that respondent is not an industry . As per the nomenclature or the respondent , carrying out the research work which can be used as goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants .

Thus , on the basis of the above observation , I am of the view that the respondent is an industry and the dispute (d) If the organization is a trade or business it does not cease to be one because of philanthropy animating the undertaking.

4521 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930 .

in between the workman and respondent is an industrial dispute and this Tribunal has got the jurisdiction to dispose ofthis reference .

some other persons juniors to the workman have been provided work . Accordingly , the second part of the reference is answered in positive that the workman is entitled for the relief. As in compliance of this memorandum, no steps were taken by the management to provide the work to the workman , the workman is entitled for the work by the management without any back wages as alleged by him during arguments . Accordingly , the management of the respondent is directed to provide the work in implementation of the settlement between the management andthe workman dated 13-9-93 within a reasonable time. Let the Central Government be informed . File be consignd. G. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 15 जुलाई , 2008

का. आ. 2219.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947

का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार केन्द्रीय भैंस अनुसंधान संस्थान के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिकः अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 1 , चण्डीगढ़ , के पंचाट (संदर्भ सं. 153/93 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Again this Tribunal has to discuss for the relief part onimplementation of the settlement between the workman and the management of the respondent . Learned counsel forthemanagement has alleged that the workman was given an opportunity vide letter No. dated 3-1-94 and 28-1-94 to report to the respondent for work. The workman failed to report . Hence , it was considered by the respondent that he has abandoned his opportunity. In support of this contention, 2 letters have been filed by the management namely letter No. 18 and 19 dated 3-1-94 and 28-1-94 respectively . Both of these letters are reminders and contained the sentence that the workman has already been informed by the office . But the original letter informing the workman to report to the office for work is not on record. Moreover , as per the official records filed by the management , these reminders were sent upon the workman not by registered but by ordinary post. The management has not proved the circumstances under which these letters were sent to the workman through ordinary post . Whether the management was short of funds or any other reason which can be treated as compelling circumstances to send these reminders through ordinary post have not been proved . In such type of transactions , in general practice , the information should he communicated through Registered A.D. Post but the management has not opted that.

[सं. एल-42012/156/92- आई.आर. (डी. यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 15th July, 2008 Moreover, thisoriginal letter asking the workman to report for the work is not on record. These two letters are just reminders and are said to be sent through ordinary postwhich cannot be treated as the proper communication.

S.O. 2219. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 153/ 93) ofCentral Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court No. I Chandigarh , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the management of Central Institute for Research of Buffaloes and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 15-07-2008 .

[ No. L-42012/ 156/92 - IR( DU ) ]

SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

Moreover, this reference is pending adjudication before this Tribunal from 1993 itself . Management of the respondent appeared in March , 1994. It was open to the management to offer the work in compliance of the memorandum dated 13-9-93 , which came in existence on account of the settlement between the workman and the management before the Tribunal itself. Thus , these two reminders which are said to be sent by ordinary post seems to be just face wash by management .

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA , PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT - 1 , CHANDIGARH .

Case No. 1. D. 153/93

Sri Nandu Ram S/o Sh . Ram Jagun Saluwalia Bhatha, Saluwal P.O. Rajgarh . Teh . Nabha , Patiala

-Applicant

Versus

Director , Central Institute for Research on Buffaloes . Nabha .

Iamunable to restrain myself to write on the abnormal delay in disposal or this reference. Within a reasonable time, this reference should have been disposed of by this Tribunal . Workman and the rnanagement have no concern that this Tribunal was lying vacant for a long period in phases . Likewise, the workman and the management have no concern regarding the infrastructure and any other constraint working conditions faced by this Tribunal . It may be the result of the several reasons that this reference could not be disposed of, but both workman and management have the right to get their grievances redressed withina reasonable time . This reference is being disposed of after 15 years and considering the age of workman. These 15 years were valuable for his entire life span.

-Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the workman

: Sri H. S. Bath

Forthe Management : Sri R. K. Sharma Thus, on the basis of the above discussion , I am of the view that no efforts were taken by the management of the respondent for implication of settlement dated 13-9-93 and no opportunity was given to the workman to work in the management of the respondent, whereas admittedly, 4522

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

AWARD

Passed on : 8-7-08

Central Govt . vide notification No. L - 42012/ 156/92- IR(D.U . ) dated 13-12-93 , referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-

"Whether the action of the management of Central Institute for Research on Buffaloes Nabha in terminating the services of Shri Nandu Ram S /o Shri Ram Jugan w.e.f. 17-8-90 is legal and justified ? If not, what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from what date? "

Just before the reference, there was a settlement between 8 workmen including Shri Nandu Ram and the Management ofthe respondent on 13-9-93 . The memorandum ofthe settlement is on record . This memorandum is admitted toboth ofthe parties . Learned counsel for the management has stated that in view of this memorandum , the reference became infructuous and liable to be returned to the Central Government as such , whereas , learned counsel for the workmenhas agitated it that this Tribunal has got power to adjudicate the matter relating to non - implementation ofthis memorandum dated 13-9-93 .

The memorandum dated 13-9-93 makes the job ofthis Tribunal very easy. Thus the first part of the reference that whether the action of the management of Central Institute for Research onBuffaloes Nabha, in terminating the services ofShri Nandu Ram w.e.f. 17-8-90 is legal and justified is not to be discussed without any comment. This Tribunal has to discuss and determine to what reliefis the workman entitled in view of memorandum dated 13-9-93 . Thus , after this settlement between the workman and the management of respondent, there is no occasion for this Tribunal to discuss the nature of termination and non - implementation of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act . This Tribunal will confine itself for the implementation of the memorandum dated 13-9-93 which is a settlement between the workman and the management of the respondent.

The memorandum reads as under :-

The daily paid labourers who had worked at the farm ofthis Institute but did not complete 240 days in the farm as and when there is work available . These persons as per memorandum of settlement under Section 12 (3 ) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947between workmen and the management of CIRB , Hisar before Asstt . Labour Commissioner , Chandigarh and Jammu . These persons shall be given preference to over other open market daily paid worker for casual and seasonal work . The workman shall be engaged for the available work subject to his /her efficiency ofwork. The following is the list as per seniority:-

S. No.

Name and Address

1. Shri Nirmal Singh S/ o Shri Pritam Singh Vill . Fategarh Channa, P.O. Gajewas Teh . Samana ( Patiala) .

2. Shri Pala Singh S/o Shri Dalip Singh Vill . Bhore , P.O. Malewal , Teh . Nabha ( Patiala)

3. Shri Nandu Ram S/ o Shri Ram Jugan , Vill . Saluwal Bhatta , P.O. Rajgarh . Teh . Nabha (Patiala) .

4. Shri Gurmail Singh S/ o Shri . Ram Partap Singh , V& PO Rajgarh, Teh. Nabha (Patiala) .

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 5. Shri Hukam Raj S /o Sh . Balbir Singh . Vill . Kaberi . P.O. Baurpur, Teh . Nabha ( Patiala) .

6. Shri Ram Singh S/ o Sh . Jaspal Singh V& P.O . Rajgarh , Teh . Nabha (Patiala).

7. Shri Joginder Singh S/ o Sh . Tarlok Singh . Vill . Kaul , P.O. Rajgarh , Teh . Nabha ( Patiala) .

8. ShriAmarjit Singh S/o Sh . Bhan Singh . Vill . Bazidpur, P.O. Rajgarh , Teh . Nabha ( Patiala) .

As per this memorandum , on the basis of the settlement under Section 12 (3 ) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 between workman and the management CIRB , Hisar, Before Assistant Labour Commissioner, Chandigarh and Jammu , the persons named in the memorandum were to be given preference over other open market daily paid worker for casual and seasonal work .

Opportunity for adducing the evidence was given to the parties . Evidence is on record . I have heard learned counsels for the parties . Learned counsel for the workman has stated that if in implementation of the memorandum dated 13-9-93 , the workman are given the work , they will not claim any back wages whatsoever. On the other hand learned counsel for the management for respondent has argued that the respondent is not the industry and the dispute is not an industrial dispute and accordingly, this Tribunal has got no powers and jurisdiction to dispose of this part of the reference. In this context, leamed consel has relied upon a judgment of the Apex Court in Physical Research Laboratory vs. K.G. Sharma reported as 1997(3 ) , the RSJ Phase 215 , I have gone through the judgment relied by the leamed counsel for the management of respondent . Inthis judgment , Hon'ble Apex Court , in Para No. 13 has held that:-

It is nobody's case that PRL is engaged in an activity which can be called business trade or manufacture. Neither from the nature of its organizations nor from the nature and character of the activity carried onby it, it can be said to be an ' undertaking ' analogous to business or trade. It is not engaged in a commercial industrial activity and it cannot be described as an economic venture or a commercial enterprise as it is not its object to produce and distribute services which would satisfy wants and needs ofthe consumer community .It is more an institution discharging governmental functions and a domestic enterprise than a commercial enterprise . We are , therefore , ofthe opinion that PRL is not an industry even though it is carrying on the activity or research in a systematic manner with the help of its employees as it lacks that element which would make it an organization carrying on an activity which can be said to be analogous to the carrying on of a trade or business because it is not producing and distributing sercvies which are intended or meant for satisyfing human wants and needs as ordinarily understood.

On the basis of the above observation , Hon'ble the Apex Court has held that PRL is not an industry . Learned counsel for the management of respondent has argued thatCIRB is also carrying the research work like PRL and accordingly, is not an industry .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

In a landmark judgment, Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. Rajappa , and others published in (1978 ) , 2 Supreme Court cases 313 , 7-Judges Bench of Hon'ble Apex Court has defined the word " industry " . As per the above mentioned verdict of the Apex Court industry as defined in Sub- section ( J ) of Section 2 has a videimport .

(a) Where there is ( i) systematic activity , ( ii ) organized by co-operation between employer and employee (Thedirect and substantial element is chimerical) , and ( iii) for the production and/ or distribution of goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes (not spiritual or religious but inclusive of materials things orservices geared to celestial bliss ) , prima facie, there is an industry in the enterprise .

(b)Absence of profit motive or gainful objective is irrelevant, by the venture in the public joint, private or other sector.

(c) The true focus is functional and the decisive test is the nature of the activity with special emphasis on the employer-employee relations .

(d) If the organization is a trade or business it does not cease to be one because of philanthropy animating the undertaking.

Thus, the test mentioned in para no. 140 of the said judgment is necessary to qualify any institution to be an industry. Regarding the research institutions, Hon'ble Apex Court in the vary judgment has held that the professions , clubs , educational institutions, co - operatives , research institutions , charitable projects and other kindred adventures if they fulfil the triple tests, cannot be exempted from the scope ofSection 2-(j ) . The representation category or professions , clubs , co-operatives , and even gurukulas and little research laboratories may qualify for exemption , if, in simple ventures , substantially and going by dominant nature criteria substantially, no employees are entertained , but in minimal matter , marginal employees are hired without destroying the non- employee character of the unit. It has also held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the said judgment that sovereign functions strictly understood alone qualified exemption, not the welfare activities or economic adventures undertaken by Government or statutory bodies. Even in departments discharging sovereign functions , if there are units which are industries and they are substantially several then they can be considered to come within Section 2 (j ) .

In the last of the judgment Hon'ble the Apex Court held that in view of the difficulty experienced by all ofus in defining the true denotation of the term " industry" and divergence of opinion in regard thereto-as has been the casewith thisBench also we think , it is high time that the Legislature steps in with a comprehensive bill to clear up the fog and remove the doubts and set at rest once for all the controversy which crops up from timetotime in relation to the meaning ofthe aforesaid term rendering it necessary for larger Benches of this Court to be constituted which are driven to the necessity of evolving a working formula to cover particular cases.

Thus, no hard and fast rule regarding the definition ofindustry can be laid down . If any organization fulfils the triple test mentioned above they are included in the terms 2823 GI /08-23

4523

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9 , 2008/श्रावण 18, 1930

of the industry, Thus, the tribunal has to look into the matter about the activities of the organization , organized corporation between the employer and the employee and whether there is the production and/or distribution of goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes. If above mentioned three triple tests are fulfilled the organization is an industry.

Fromthe perusal of the Affidavit of the management, it isclear that, the research work ofCIRB is for the producing/ distributing of goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes . This fact that the activities of the respondent are not analogous to any trade or industry are to be proved by the respondent management . The respondent management has not clearly mentioned its functioning. Thus , in the absence of the functioning of the respondent, it is open for this Court to hold that management has failed to prove that respondent is not an industry. As per the nomenclature of the respondent , respondent carrying out the research work which can be used as goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants.

Thus, on the basis of the above observation , I am of the view that the respondent is an industry and the dispute in between the workman and respondent is an industrial dispute and this Tribunal has got the jurisdiction todispose ofthis reference .

Again this Tribunal has to discuss for the relief part on implementation or the settlement between the workman and the management of the respondent . Learned counsel forthe management has alleged that the workman was given anopportunity vide letter dated 3-1-94 and 28-1-94 to report tothe respondent for work. The workman failed to report. Hence, it was considered by the respondent that he has abandoned his opportunity . In support of this contention, 2letters have been filed by the management namely letter No. 18 and 19 dated 3-1-94 and 28-1-94 respectively. Both of these letters are reminders and contained the sentence that the workman has already been informed by the office . But the original letter informing the workman to report to the office for work is not on record . Moreover , as per the official records filed by the management, these reminders were sent upon the workman not by registered but by ordinary post . The management has not proved the circumstances under which these letters were sent to the workman through ordinary post . Whether the management wasshort of funds or any other reason which can be treated as compelling circumstances to send these reminders through ordinary post have not been proved. In such type oftransactions, in general practice, the information should he communicated through Registered A.D. Post but the management has not opted that.

Moreover, the original letter asking the workman to report for the work is not on record. These two letters are just reminders and are said to be sent through ordinary postwhich cannot be treated as the proper communication . Moreover, this reference is pending edjudication before this Tribunal since 1993 itself. Management of the respondent appeared in March, 1994. It was open to the manageinent to offer the work in compliance of the memorandum dated 13-9-93 , which came in existence on account or the settlement between the workman and the 4524

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

management before the Tribunal itself. Thus , these two reminders which are said to be sent by ordinary post seems to be just facewash by the management .

Iam unable to restrain myselfto write on the abnormal delay in disposal of this reference . Within a reasonable time, this reference should have been disposed or by this Tribunal . Workman and the management have no concern that this Tribunal was lying vacant for a long period in phases. Likewise , the workman and the management have no concern regarding the infrastructure and any other constraint working conditions faced by this Tribunal . It maybe the result of the several reasons that this reference could not be disposed of, but both workman and management havethe right to get their grievances redressed withina reasonable time . This reference is being disposed ofafter 15 years and considering the age of workman . These 15 years were valuable for his entire life span.

Thus , on the basis of the above discussion , I am of the view that no efforts were taken by the management of the respondent for implication of settlement dated 13-9-93 and no opportunity was given to the workman to work in the management of the respondent , whereas admittedly, some other persons juniors to the workman have been provided work. Accordingly , the second part of the reference isis answered in positive that the workman is entitled for the relief. As in compliance of the this memorandum , no steps were taken by the management to provide the work to the workman , the workman is entitled for the work by the management without any back wages as alleged by him during arguments . Accordingly, the management of the respondent is directed to provide the work in implementation of the settlement between the management and the workman dated 13-9-93 within a reasonable time . Let the Central Government be informed. Filebe consigned.

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 16 जुलाई , 2008

का.आ. 2220-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डब्लू. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 273/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [ फा. सं. एल-22015/2/1999- आईआर( सी-11 ) ]

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 16th July, 2008

S.O. 2220.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 273/ 1999) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of WCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 16-7-2008 .

[ F. No. L- 22015/2/ 1999 - IR( C - II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer

[PART 11-SEC . 3( ii) ] ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO . CGIT/ LC/R/ 273/99

Presiding Officer : Shri C. M. Singh

The General Secretary,

Rashtriya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Sangh ,

Civil Lines , PO: Kotma Colliery,

Workman/Union

Distt. Shahdol (MP)

:

Versus

TheAgent,

Bhadra Colliery, Jamuna and Kotma Area of WCL , Distt. Shahdol (MP)

Management

AWARD

Passed on this 30th day ofJune , 2008

1.The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide itsNotification No. L- 22015 /2/99 - IR(C- II ) dated nil has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

"Whether the action of the management of Bhadra Colliery, Western Coalfields Ltd. , Distt. Shahdol (MP) in terminating the services of S / Sh . Chakradhar Mishra, ClerkGr. 3 , Vinay Lal , Trammer Cat. 3, Awadh Sharan Tiwari , Fitter Helper Cat. 2 and Umadatt Shukla , Fitter Helper Cat . 2 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman concerned are entitled?"

2.Videorder dated 18-5-05 passed on the order sheet of this reference proceeding , the reference proceeded exparte against workmen Sarva Shri Chakradhar Mishra , Vinay Lal , Trammer , Awadh Sharan Tiwari and Umadatt Shukla/Union . No statement of claim has been filed on behalfofworkmen /Union .

3. The case of the management in brief is as follows . The services of workmen were dismissed w.e.f 1-7-1984. Workmen S / Shri Chakradhar Mishra, Vinay Lal , Awadh SharanTiwari and Umadatt Shukla were working in Bhadra Colliery of WCL, Distt . Shahdol which is now known as SECL. That on 16-2-84 at about 4PM , one worker named Shri Ramawatar suffered injury in a mine accident . On it workmen S /Shri Chakradhar Mishra and others went to the office of management , misbehraved , abused and assaulted officers of the company named Shri Shivram, Under Manager , Shri M. Kar Sr. Under Manager and Shri B. D. Acharya , Dy. Personnel Manager. That for the gross misconduct committed by them , they were issued with a chargesheet . As the reply submitted by the workmen was found unsatisfactory , a departmental enquiry was conducted against them . The enquiry was conducted legally and properly following the principles of natural justice .On completion of enquiry proceedings , the Enquiry Officer submitted enquiry report holding all the workmen guilty of the charges . The enquiry proceedings including 4525 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9, 2008/श्रावण 18 , 1930

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI R. G. SHUKLA , PRESIDING

OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, SHRAM BHAWAN, A.T.I. CAMPUS , UDYOG NAGAR, KANPUR .

Industrial Dispute No. 118 of 1999

The Assistant General Secretary ( In relation to workman Shri AS Dhankani ) , Union Bank Staff Association ( UP) C/ o Union Bank of India , Parmat Branch , Kanpur And

Union Bank of India,

TheAssistant General Manager , UnionBank of India , Pandu Nagar , Kanpur

AWARD

1. Central Government , MOL, New Delhi , vide notification No. L- 12012/33 /99 - IR.B - 11 dated 7/ 11-6-1999 , has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal-

the enquiry report was placed before the competent authority who after having satisfied decided to terminate the services of workmen from services and accordingly vide order dated 1-7-84 they were dismissed from services. That all the workmen accepted their guilt in writing and asked for pardon and requested for grant of an opportunity to serve the company. A settlement took place between the workmen and the SECL. According to terms of settlement, they were given fresh appointments bythe company and they joined their duties except Shri Chakradhar Mishra. The present dispute is settled by way of settlement (Annexure M -4 ) . In the light of the said settlement , all of them were given appointment orders and all of them except Shri Chakradhar Mishra reported for duty and they are in employment . Shri Chakradhar Mishra has not reported for duty for the reason best known to him . The present dispute stands settled by way of settlement as aforesaid. Hence there is no merit in reference proceeding and the workmen are not entitled to the relief claimed.

Whether the action of the management ofUnion Bank ofIndia, in denying the post of Computer Operator to Shri A.S. Dhankani is just and legal ? If not, what relief is the workman entitled to?

4. Inview ofthe above , the reference is decided in favour ofthe management and against the workmen without any orders as to costs holding that the action of the management of Bhadra Colliery, Western Coalfields Ltd. , Distt . Shahdol (MP) in terminating the services of S/Sh . Chakradhar Mishra, Clerk Gr. 3, Vinay Lal , Trammer Cat. 3, Awadh Sharan Tiwari , Fitter Helper Cat. 2 and Umadatt Shukla, Fitter Helper Cat . 2 is legal and justified and consequently they are not entitled to any relief.

5. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules .

C. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली, 16 जुलाई, 2008

का.आ. 2221.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 118/1999) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

2. The case, in short as set up by the union on behalf of the workman is that the concerned workman is an employee ofUnion Bank of India as Clerk/Cashier at Banks ' Kaushalpuri Branch , Kanpur. It is further pleaded that in the process of computerization of the branches of the bank opposite party needed certain Computer Operators to operate computers and in order to select Computer Operators from Clerical cadre , the opposite party bank invited applications from the eligible candidates for aptitude test. The workman also applied for selection and after test the bank prepared a list of selected candidates which was circulated vide bank's circular No. DP: ZO: LKO: CIR::4869/97 dated 26-9-1997 , which inter- alia provides that the , appointments from the panel will be made in the order of serial number indicated in the list based on the occurrence of the vacancies arising on computer being installed and made operational . It is the further case of workman that his name figured at S. No. 17 inthe selected list and that upto 31-7-1998 candidates upto S. No. 14 were offered posting as Computer Operator . It has also been pleaded that from 01-8-1998 onwards' postings of Computer Operators were to be made from S. No. 15 .

[फा. सं. एल-12012/ 33/1999- आईआर( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 16th July, 2008

S.O. 2221. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 118/ 1999) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Union Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 16-7-2008 .

[F. No. L- 12012/33/ 1999- IR(B- II)]

3. It has further been pleaded that opposite party bank opened its extension counter at Krishna Nagar, Kanpur on 1-8-1998 as computerized branch . The bank also identified two vacancies of Computer Operator at its Service Branch, Kanpur and in this way on 1-8-1998 in all there were three vacancies of Computer Operator with opposite party bankwhich, were to be filled up as per policy circulated by opposite party bank vide their circular dated 26-9-1997 (Supra) . Under these circumstances persons appearing at S. No. 15 , 16 and 17 of the select list prepared by opposite partybank for posting as Computer Operator should have been offered posting, one at Krishna Nagar Extension Counter and two at bank's Service Branch , Kanpur. It is RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer 4526

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008 / SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

assignment for a period of three years from the date of refusal as per policy of the bank and from such a debar Shri Dhankani cannot escape for the simple reason that it has resulted due to his own refusal and in this regard Shri Dhankani has confused with the matter. Lastly it is pleaded that neither there was any illegality nor unjustifiability in the action of the management in case Shri Dhankani was debarred for higher assignment for a period of three years from the date of refusal in accepting higher assignment , therefore the action of the management was in conformity withthe policy of the bank and the claim of Shri Dhankani needs no consideration on merit and he is liable to be rejected.

5. After exchange of pleadings both contesting parties havefiled documentary evidence as well as adduced oral evidence. Whereas management per list dated 20-7-2001 hasfiled nine documents in support oftheir claim , the union vide list dated 18-6-2001 has filed five documents in support ofhis case .

the further case of the workman that he should have been offered his posting as Computer Operator at Bank's Krishna Nagar Extension Counter branch at Kanpur or at its Service Branch, Kanpur . The opposite party bank instead of offering the post of Computer Operator at the aforesaid branches offered him the post of Computer Operator at its IIT Extension Counter Branch vide letter dated 10-8-1998 . It has also been pleaded by the workman that on 1-8-1998 no vacancy ofComputer Operator was in existence at bank's IIT Extension Counter branch , Kanpur . The workman vide hisrepresentation dated 24-8-1998 represented the opposite party bank on the ground that offer of his posting at IIT, Kanpur as Computer Operator is absolutely wrong and omputer that he should be posted at Service Branch . The opposite partyvidetheir letter dated 29-8-1998 advised the workman that he has been given the offer of Computer Operator at Extension Counter IIT. Therefore he should give his refusal / acceptance within two days failing which no further opportunity shall be granted to him . Finding no way out theworkman declined the offer of the opposite party bank for his posting as Computer Operator at IIT, Kanpur and thereafter approached the union for redressal of his grievance . With regard to vacancy at Extension Counter IIT, Kanpur the bank advised that since Shri M.P. Pal , Computer Operator had applied for his transfer to Krishna Nagar Extension Counter , therefore the vacancy was identified at IIT, Kanpur . It has also been alleged that a vacancy is always identified where it is and since no vacancy was at IIT Extension Counter , Kanpur, therefore the workman could not have been offered his posting at IIT, Kanpur . The action of the opposite party bank is malafide , illegal and unjustified and on these grounds the workman is entitled for special allowance for the post of Computer Operator w.e.f. 1-8-1998 .

6. Union has examined its witness Shri A.S. Dhankani as W.W. 1 , witness on oath has stated that he is working asComputer Operator at bank's Parmat Branch , Kanpur . Prior to it he worked as Clerk- cum- Cashier at bank's Kaushalpuri Branch , Kanpur . Witness has expressed his ignorance about the fact as to in which year he applied for hisposting as Computer Operator . Witness has further categorically admitted the fact that his name figured at S. No. 17 in the panel of selected candidates and also that his option was sought for his posting at IIT Branch , Kanpur . Witness has also clarified that as per instructions of circular vide which names of selected candidates were circulated clearly envisages that the vacancies of Computer Operators shall be strictly filled , in order of its serial number. He has further admitted the fact that till 31-7-1998 candidates appearing upto the serial number 14 of the panel of selected candidates had been given their posting as Computer Operator by the opposite party bank and that on 1-8-1998 three vacancies of Computer Operator were identified by the bank of which two were at Service Branch and one at Krishna Nagar Extension Counter Branch , Kanpur. He has further categorically stated that he had not been given any offer/ chance for his posting at the above identified vacancies of Computer Operator . He has also deposed the fact that no vacancy of Computer Operator was identified by the bank for its IIT Extension Counter Branch , Kanpur. Inhiscross examination witness has accepted the fact that he was given offer which was declined by him . Witness has further proved the documents filed by the opposite party bank . Witness has further accepted that for the second time when he was interviewed he was given his posting as Computer Operator. Witness goes on to admit the fact that the offer which was given to him , he was not in position to accept the same which . fact was mentioned in his letter. The management has not given him posting of his choice . Therefore he did not join . Witness has further admitted the fact that an employee who refuses higher assignment is debarred from the same for three years .

4. The opposite party bank has vehemently contested the claim of the workman , on the ground that the vacancy at IIT. Kanpur had arisen due to the fact that one extension counter was to be opened on 1-8-1998 at Krishna Nagar. Kanpur and Shri M.P. Pal, Computer Operator posted at IIT Extension Counter Branch , Kanpur had requested for his posting at Krishna Nagar as he hails from the area . Considering the fact that Shri Pal hails from the same area and his posting at the counter will be in the interest ofthe pank , transfer of the services of Shri Pal from IIT Extension Counter. Kanpur to Krishna Nagar Extension Counter , Kanpur had been issued. Thus the vacancy of Computer Operator at IIT Extension Counter had arisen and to fill up he vacancy ofComputer Operator at IIT Extension Counter n terms of panel circulated by the bank . Workman had been offered the post of higher assignment of Computer Operator at IIT Extension Counter which he had received with thanks . Identification of vacancies at a station , transfer/ posting of staff at the same station in any branch/ office is purely a management function for effective running of its branch/administration in which unions have no right to interfere . It has also been alleged that Shri Dhankani refused to accept the offer of higher assignment vide his letter dated NIL which was sent to the Regional Office by the Branch Manager, Kaushalpuri Branch vide letter dated 4-9-1998 . Therefore Shri Dhankani was debarred for higher

7. On the contrary opposite party bank has examined its witness Shri Anil Pujara . Witness has deposed that 4527.

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9, 2008/ श्रावण 18, 1930

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

videExt.M-5, workman was offered higher assignment for which the workman has extended thanks to the bank . Witness has further deposed that vide Ext . M-4 workman made representation and that vide Ext. M-3 , the workman had refused to accept higher assignment and thereafter as perpolicyofthe bank the workman was debarred for higher assignment for a period of three years as per bank's policy. In his cross examination the witness has expressed his ignorance about the fact as to when . vacancy was identified at bank's Krishna Nagar Branch , Kanpur.

8. I have heard the arguments ofthe parties at length andhave perused the records of the case carefully.

9. There is no dispute about the fact that bank conducted examination process for preparing a penal of Computer Operator. There is also no dispute aboul the fact that the workman undertook the examination process and stood selected . His name figured at S.No. 17. It is also evident fromthe evidence of the workman that till 31-07-1998, 14 selected candidates of the panel list had been given offer ofposting at different branches of the bank as Computer Operator.

operational . From the evidence of the parties it is also established that on 1-9-1998 no vacancy of Computer Operator at IIT Extension Counter Branch , Kanpur was identified.Therefore offer ofposting in favour ofworkman for their IHT Extension Counter Branch as Computer Operator can not be held valid and justified for simple reason that when there was no vacancy at bank's IIT Extension Counter Branch on 01-09-1998, how the opposite party bankwas able to offer posting at that branch . From the records of the case and evidence of the parties it is established that three vacancies of Computer Operator had arisen on 01-09-1998 out of which one at Krishna Nagar Extension Counter Branch of the Bank and two at Service Branch of the Bank . In all fairness Shri Dhankani , the concernedworkman should have been offered the post of ComputerOperator in either ofthe aforesaid branches and in case he had refused to accept his offer as Computer Operator forbank's IIT Extension Counter Branch, Kanpur hewas fullyjustified in doing so as on 01-09-1998 there was novacancy at bank's IIT Extension Counter Branch.. Therefore the Tribunal is totally unable to appreciate the arguments advanced by the representative for the opposite party bank that it was the prerogative of the management to make transfer and posting at their branches of their choice in the interest of administration .

10. It has been strongly argued on behalf ofthe workmanthatwhen after 31-07-1998 , when three vacancies of Computer Operator were identified by the Opposite Party bank, viz. , one at Krishna Nagar Extension Counter and two at Parmat Branch , Kanpur , the workman falling within eligibility zone , should have been offered the posting as Computer Operator at either places or branches, asper guidelines contained in Ext. M -6. On the contrary it has been argued on behalf of the opposite party bank that identification of vacancies at a station , transfer/ posting ofstaff at the same station In any branch/office is a purely management function for effective running of its branch/ administration in which unions have no right to interfere . It has also been argued by the representative oftheoppositeparty bank that the transfer of Shri M. P.Pal, Computer Operator posted at IIT Extension Counter Branch, Kanpur at Extension Counter Krishna Nagar Branch, Kanpur was in Public interest, and therefore it should not be interfered.

12.Transfer of Shri Pal from IIT Extension Counter Branch , Kanpur to Krishna Nagar Extension Counter Branch , Kanpur cannot be held to be valid and justified on the ground as set up by the opposite party bank in their reply that Shri Pal hails from the area. It clearly goes to establish the fact that Shri M.P. Pal had been shown undue favoritism by the opposite party bank in accommodating his request for his transfer in the garb of promotion policy. Under these circumstances it is held that the workman was fullyjustified in refusing his posting for IIT Extension Counter Branch, Kanpur as Computer Operator . This kind of act on the part of the opposite partybank is clearly indicative of the fact that the bank. was not judicious in its decision with regard to concerned workman in the light of Ext . M -6 . In all fairness the workman should have been offered his posting as Computer Operator either at Krishna Nagar. Extension Counter or Service Branch. There is no document or any piece of acceptable evidence on record from the side of management to the effect that they had ever offered the workman his posting as Computer Operator at either of the places referred to above. Therefore the Tribunal is not inclined to accept the arguments of the management. The representative for the workman has substantiated his claim with full swing as such there is no room to disbelieve the claim of the workman .

13. For the reasons given above , it is held that the action ofthemanagement in denying the post ofComputer Operator to Shri A.S.Dhankani is neither legal norjustified. Accordingly the workman is held entitled for Computer Operator allowance w.e.f. 01-09-1998 together with pendent eliteand future interest @ 10% per annus against arrears of wages till the date he had boon placed as Computer Operatorby the bank...

R. G. SHUKLA, PresidingOfficer 11. After considering the rival arguments of the parties in the light of Ext . M -6 which clearly provides that appointments from the panel will be made in the order of serial number indicated in this list based on the occurrence ofthe vacancies arising on Computer being installed and made operational, the arguments advanced by the representative for the management is not acceptable. Of course it is the prerogative of the administration/ management to make transfer and posting of their employees as per exigency of work, but at the same time it is equally correct according to settled principles of law that the administration/ management should discharge their obligations in accordance with policy and instructions issued in that behalf and in accordance with Principles of Natural Justice. Ext . M -6 very much clarifies that the appointment from the panel will be made in order of serial number indicated in the list based on occurrence of vacancies arising on Computer being installed and made

2823 G1/08-24 4928

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] नई दिल्ली, 16 जुलाई, 2008

का.आ. 2222.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947) का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एल आई सी ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधि करण नं. 1 , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 34/1993 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो कान्द्रीय सरकार को 16-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[फा. सं. एल-17012/08/1993- आईआर ( बी- II ) ]:

राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी,

New Delhi , the 16th July, 2008

S.O. 1222.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 34/1993 ) ofthe Industrial Tribunal No. 1 , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the em- ployers in relation to the management of LIC of india and theirworkman , which was received by the Central Govern- ment on 16-7-2008 .

[F. No. L- 17012/08/ 1993 - IR(B - II ) ]

RAJINDER-KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - I HYDERABAD

PRESENT: SIK.M. Nagabhushan Rao, B.A. , B.L. , Chairman Dated the 30thday ofJune , 2008

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO.34 OF 1993- BETWEEN :

K. V. Ramachandra Reddy,

S/ o K. Sudarshan Reddy, age 32 years

-Petitioner

Apprentice.Development Officer as per letter of the Respondentdt . 17-1-1990 . The Petitioner joined the service on 24-1-1990 . The Petitioner is a Post-Graduate in Commerce and he worked hard and served the Respondent without any complaints . He could bring in a new business of Rs. 14,59,500 under 36 proposals and completed business of Rs . 10 , 22,000 under 31 proposals by 23-1-1991 . He also appointed 12 Agents and obtained 36 policies during his short service . However the Branch Manager by his letter dt. 24-1-1999 informed the petitioner that his services were terminated w.e.f. 24-1-1991 alleging that his performance was found to be unsatisfactory. The action of the Respondent is highly arbitrary and unjustified. The Petitioner resided at Talaprolu which is his Headquarters and he had all correspondence from that place . He submitted his tour and periodical reports to the Respondent regularly. The Respondent.continued the service of another employee by name P. Srinivas whose performance was for below to that of the Petitioner . Thus discrimination has beenshowntowards the petitioner . The Petitioner was not given one month's notice pay and also retrenchment compensation before his services were terminated. Thus the termination order is violative of Section 25 - F of the Act and also violated the principles of natural justice as no notice was given and no enquiry was conducted before the termination of the petitioner . The termination order is arbitrary. Further the Branch Manager has no power to terminate the services of the petitioner and in this ground alone , the termination order is liable to be set aside . The petitioner is unemployed and inspite of his beat efforts he is unable to secure any alternative employment. He was getting a salary of Rs . 1,250.00 per month at the time ofhis termination of service . Hence he prays this Tribunal to pass an Award directing the Respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service with full back wages and other attendant benefits .

R/o 10-4/ 1 , Devarkapuram , Dilsuknagar, Hyderabad.

AND

The Life Insurance Corporation of India,

Represented by its Sr. Divisional Manager,

Machilipatnam.

-Respondent

APPEARANCE :

G. Sucha, Advocate for the Respondent .

None appeared for the petitioner (after remand) .

AWARD

TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour, by its OrderNo. L- 17012/08/93-1R ( B - II ), dt. 30-8-1993 made this reference under section 10 ( 1 ) (d) (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( hereinafter called the Act ) for adjudication ofthe dispute annexed in the schedule which reads as follows :

Whether the action of the Management of LIC, Machilipatnam Division in terminating the Services of Sri K.V.R.C. Reddy on completion of Apprenticeship period isjustified? Ifnot, what relief, he isentitled to ?"

This reference has been registered as Industrial DisputeNo.34 of 1993 on the file of this Tribunal .

2. The Petitioner filed his claim statement to the following effect :-The Petitioner was appointed as

3. On behalf of the Respondent, a counter has been filed to the following effect : This reference is not maintainable as the action taken by the L.I.C. of India in respect of the petitioner is under the statutory provisions of L.I.C. of India (Apprentice Development Officer) Recruitment Scheme , 1980 as amended from time to time and the provisions of the 1. D. Act are not applicable to the petitioner . The petitioner was not retrenched within the meaning of Section 2 (oo) of the Adt and not terminated from service within the meaning of Section 2(bb) of the Act nor retrenched under the condition stipulated under Section 25- F of the Act . The petitioner was discharged from service w.e.f. 24-1-1991 as his performance duringthe apprentice period was found not satisfactory and not upt the requirement . This decision taken by the Respondent is within the powers under I. C. (Apprentice Development Officers) Recruitment Scheme, 1980. As such there is no violation ofany of the provisions of the Act. The petitioner K. V. R. Reddy was appointed as Apprentice Development Officer for a period of one year from 24-1-1990 under the provisions ofthe L.1 . C. ( Apprentice Development Officers ) Recruitment Scheme , 1980. The appointment letter stipulated the conditions regarding the Apprenticeship Theoretical Training placing the petitioner on probation, liability of being discharged from sérvice without any notice 4529 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजतन्त्र : अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

The petitioner, workman, got himself, examined as WWI and he deposed toto the averments inin bis claug, statement . The A.O. of thethe respondent corporation deposed to the averiments to the counter . The details of the documents marked on behalf of the petitioner, and the onspondants are appended to, this Award

5. The point that arises for consideration in this refererice are as follows

(1 ) Whether the petitioner KVR.C. Reddy, Apprentice Development Officer is aworkman under Section 2 ( s ) of the LD. Act

(2) Whether the Managemant of Respondant Corporation is justified, in terminating the services of the petitioner K.VR.C. Radden completion of Apprenticeship period ? ...

(3 ) Towhat referthe petitioner is entitled to

6. This case is before this Tribunala second time on the remand by the Hon'ble High Court by its orders in W.P. No. 26268/96 which was initiatedby the Respondent Insurance, Corporation aggrieved by the orders ofofmy learned predecessor.

7. The Hon'ble High Court instead of holding that the petitioner in the I was declared to be not a workman as against the finding, given by my learned predecessor to issue No.1, as it would be a travesty of Justice , in as much as the petitioner in I.D. ( second respondent in W.P.)would not have an opportunity to establish that is entitled to be consider as a workman , remanded the matter setting aside the entire order. It is only for the purpose of enabling .The petitioner in the I.D. to adduce furthefurther evidence or to place other material than " S. K. Verma " case ( 1984 SC 1462) which was scrutinized in H.R. Adyanthaya Vs. Sandoz ( India ) Ltd. AIR 1984SC making the decision ofVerma case as per incuriam.

8.My learned predecessor answered the first,issue purely on the basis of Verma case and held the petitioner wasaworkman. The exact words ofthe Hon'ble High Court in the writ petition as follows

and other conditions of appointment as Apprentice DevelopmentOfficer . During the period ofApprenticeship , he has undergone Theoretical Training at Training Centre for two months, training at a selected branch for one month , and Field training of 9 months . As the performance of the petitioner during the Apprenticeship period was found not satisfactory and not upto the requirement , he was discharged without placing him on probation in terms of the appointment letter dt. 17-1-1990 . The Petitioner was required, among other things , to complete new business of Rs . 15 lakhs during these nine months Field Training in the Apprenticeship period . As against this target, the petitioner was able to secure completed new business of Rs . 10,22 lakhs only in a given period resulting in short fall of new business required to Rs . 4.78 lakhs . The Petitioner also should appoint atleast eight agents during the full training period .He had to procure atleast 10 Jeevan Dhara/Jeevan Akshay Policies. He has to submit promptly a fortnight report ofhis activities in the field in the proforma supplied and also satisfyhis superiors that he had good work habits. Only then he wouldbe considered for being placed on probation at end of the Apprenticeship period . The petitioners performance was found not satisfactory, hewas informed in the letter dated 3-10-90 that he was not seen either by the Branch Manager or Assistant Branch Manager (Sales after 15-9-90) and that he had not promptly submitted the fortnight work reports . He was advised several times to contract the official's atleast once in a week and to report about his plans and performance. Не was not informing his where about and he was found not staying at his given Headquarters . He was not promptly and adequately touring the area enterested to him . On 7-1-1991 the petitloner was informed that is performance was totally disappointing although he had completed 7 months field training period as Apprentice Development Officer. He was also told he was not taking adeqirate, interest for the completion of the business introduced by him. The member of agents appointed and qualified was far below the target fixed. He was also informed that the respondent might not recommend his case for being placed on probation unless there is a marked improvement in his performance in the Ist fortnight of January , 1991 ; a decision was taken by the competent authority to discharge the petitioner w.g.f.24-1-91. Accordingly a telegram was issued on24-1-91 followed by a letter registered by post on same date. The appeal against discharge made by the petitioner was duly considered by the competent authority and the decision to discharge the petitioner was confirmed as the authority did not find any valid reasons for reversing the decision taken earlier . The case ofP. Srinivas referred toby the petitioner is entirely different on facts and is not comparable with that of the petitioner . The discharge of Apprentice or a person on probation does not amount to retrenchment within the meaning of the Section 2(oo) of theAct or Section 2( bb) of the Act or 25 - F ofthe Act . The petition is not entitled for the relief reinstatement and back wages as such is not entitled for any relief under this

reference .

4.Onbehalfofthe petitioner the workman WWI is examined Exs. W 1 to 17 are market. On behalf of the respondent, MWI is examined and Exs . Mi to Memarked.

"Perhaps, the Tribunal did not find it necessary to do so in view of its examination of S.K.Verma's case.Ifonly the judgment of the Constitution Bench in H.R. Adyanthaya scase ( supra ) is brought to the notice ofthe Tribunal , perhaps it would have bad an occasion to allow or let thelet the parties to lead appropriate evidence in the matter and decide the issues raised on consideration of the material that was brought before it . Ifthe answer furnished by the Tribunal on issue No.1 is to be set aside by me and hold that the 2nd Respondent is not a workman, it would be a travesty of justice, inasmuch as the second respondent did not have an opportunity to establish that he is liable to be considered as a workman still, based upon many factorimurtkich make him to be treated ankpensieredjes akman . Similarly, if the 2nd Respondebodyteated as a workman at all , the ladustrial Tribunal cannot usurpethe jurisdiction to examine the pomoctness ofthe orders passed by the writ petitioner"..

4530

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9, 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

9. The basis for the finding given by my learned predecessor being declared incuriam in the light of H.R. Adyanthayalas Verma's case , as it did not refer the previous three decisions namelyMay and Baker (AIR 1967 SC678), WIMCO(AIR 1964- SC472 ) and Burmah Shell cases (AIR 1971 SC 922) , the purpose of remand was for placementof further inaterials in support of Verma's case . But the petitioner in the 1.D. did not bother to adduce evidence nor did he produce any material justifying his status as workman. For that matter he did not bother to appear after the remand nor represented by any advocate . Technically the casewas remanded for this purpose instead of setting aside the answer by the Tribunal issue No. I enabling the partyto show that Adyanthaya case is not applicable to himand that Verma case is alone the law of land , thatbeing not done this Tribunal is not permitted to go beyond the findings givenby the Hon'ble High Court and in the above view ofthe matter I answer the first issue against the workman, that he is not a workman.

10. In the light ofthe finding given in issue No. I no finding is needed to the issue No. 2 and the finding given tothe second issue was also set aside by the Hon'ble High Court.Accordingly the issue No. 2 also is deemed to be negatived.

11. On the aforesaid reasoning the petition and the I.D. isdismissed and in the circumstances , no order as to costs.

Typed to my dictation and transcribed by him and correctedbyme and pronounced in the open Court on this the 30th day ofJune , 2008.

K. M. NAGABHUSHAN RAO , Chairman AppendixofEvidence

Witness examined for the Petitioner

W. W. 1 : K.V. Ramachandra Reddy

Witness examined for Respondent.

M.W.I : MIV.S.R. Anjaneyulu .

Documents marked for the Petitioner Ex.W 1 :Letter ofSelection issued to W. W. 1 dated 11-1-90.

ExW2 : Posting order issued to W.W. i , dated 21-8-90.

Ex W3to W6 : Tour Programmes sheets for 6/90, 7/90, 10/90& 1/91 ofW.W.I.

Ex W7to/W8: Performance Sheets of W.W.1 .

ExW9 : Termination of services of W. W.i , dated 24-1-91.

Ex W10 : Performance Sheet.

ExWII : Representation made to Zonal Manager , Hyderabad, dated 11-5-91 .

Exd W12 :Forwarding letter by the Branch Manager, dated 11-5-91.

Ex.W 13 :Representation to Assistant Labour Commissioner.

Ex.W14 :Xerox copy ofthe reply by the LIC to Ex. W.13, dated6-1-92.

Ex.W 15 Reply toEx . W 14, dated29-4-92.

Ex W 16 : Minutes ofConciliation.

Ex.W 17 : Failurę report,

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] Documents marked for the Respondent

Ex. MI : Appointment order of the Petitioner, dated 17-1-90.

Ex.M2 : Copy of the letter of the Branch Manager ofRespondent Showing the Performance given in the LIC by the Petitioner , dated 3-10-90.

Ex.M3 : Xerox copy of the letter issued by the MarketingManager LIC to the Petitioner , dated 7-1-91 .

Ex.M4 : Copy of LIC Apprentices Development Office Recruitment Scheme, 1980. AFTER REMAND -NIL

नई दिल्ली, 16 जुलाई, 2008

का.आ. 2223. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. । चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 13/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/212 /1998- आईआर ( बी -11 ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 16th July, 2008

S.O. 2223.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 13/2000) oftheCentral Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court (No. 1 ) Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of UCO Bank and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 16-7-2008 .

[No. L- 12012/212/ 1998 - IR (B- II ) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No I.D. 13/2000

Sh. Surinder Singh ,

S/o Sh . Surjit Singh

Village: Jawaharpur,

P. O. Derabassi ,

Tehail Rajpura Patiala

-Applicant

Versus

UCO Bank,

The Zonal Manager,

UCO Bank, Zonal Office S.C.O.

1092-93 , Sector 22-B,

-Respondent Chandigarh- 160022 4531

भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 9, 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

APPEARANCES

None

For the workman:

N. K. Zakhmi

For the management:

AWARD

Passed on 9-7-2008

Central Govt. vide notification No : L- 12012/212/98- IR(B-II) dated28-12-1999 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of Zonal Manager , UCO Bank, Chandigarh and Chief Manager UCO Bank, Chandigarh in terminating the services of Sh. Surinder Singh Driver w.e.f. 10-6-97 and not consideirng him for regularization in accordance with the Bank's policy is just and legal? Whether the action of the management is violative of the provisions of Section 25 H of ID Act ? If so . what relief is the disputant entitled to ?"

2.No one is present , on bebalf of workman , Learned representative of the Management Shri N. K. Zakhmi is present. Since morning this reference has been called mumber of times . At 10.45 am. it was ordered to be placed before this Tribunal once again at 2pm. It is 2.30 now and on repeated calls no one is present in spite of having of full knowledge of the procedings of this reference . The reference is as old as referred to this Tribunal in the year 2000, On repeated calls since morning no one is present. accordingly the reference is dismissed in default for non- prosecution . Cental Government be informed accordingiy File to be consigned .

Chandigarh , 9-7-2008

GK . SHARMA , Presiding Officer नईदिल्ली, 16 जुलाई, 2008

का.आ. 2224. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय चेत्रई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 13/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-7-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [फा. सं. एल-12012/ 109/2006 - आईआर( बी- II ) ]

राजिन्द्रकुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 16th July, 2008

S.O. 2224.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 13/2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -Cum- Labour Court Chennai , is as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indian Bank and their workmen, received bythe Central Government on 16-7-2008.

[F. No. L- 12012/ 109/2006- IR (B - II ) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT CHENNAI

Wednesday, the 25th June , 2008

Present: K. Jayaraman , PresidingOfficer Industrial Dispute No. 13/2007

1 [In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause ( d) ofsub -section ( I ) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 147) , between theManagement of Indian Bank and their workman ]

BETWEEN

SriG.R. Samy

: Ist Party/Petitioner AND

TheDy. General Manager, Indian Bank, Head Office

68, Rajaji Salai

Chennai -600001

: 2nd Party/Management

APPEARANCE

Forthe Petitioner

: M/s . K.M. Ramcsh , Advocates

For the Management : M/s. T. S. Gopalan & Co.

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide Order No. L- 12012/ 109/2006 , IR ( B - II ) dated6-2-2007 has referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

The Schedule mentioned in that order is:

"Whether the action of the Management ofthe Indian Bank in awarding the punishment of Compulsory Retirement with superannuation benefits to Sri G. R. Samy is just and legal ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled ?"

2.After the receipt of Industrial Dispute, this Tribunal hasnumbered it as ID 13/2007 and issued notices to both sides ..Both sides entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement.respectively.

3.The allegations mentioned in the Claim Statement arebriefly as follows:

The petitioner joined the Respondent Bank in the year 1978 as a Sub -staff. Subsequently, he was promoted as a Clerk/ Shroff in the year 1990. He was entrusted with the job ofBPO/DD Section . While so , he was issued with a Charge Memo on 24-10-2002 on the allegation that while he was working in the BPO/DD Issue Section , he had removed BPO No. 004639 from the BPO Book kept in the Officer'stable without his knowledge and handed it over to one Sri Ravindran , an ex - employee of the Respondent Bank. When the non - availability of BPO was noticed by Section Officer on 19-03-2001 and when. he inquired the petitioner about the same , he pleaded ignorance and it was marked as cancelled in the BPO Register . On 02-04-2001 , the said BPO No. 004639 purported to be missing was presented through clearing by Service Branch, Canara Bank, Chennai favouring New Lakshmi Saw Mills , Bangalore for an amount of Rs . 3,50,000 with the endorsement on the 4532

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9, 2008 /SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ] reverse " Payee's A/ c Credited " . But it was found the signature in the BPO was forged and the same was returned . The petitioner was placed under suspension pending enquiry and he challenged the same by filing a Writ Petition inWP No. 21650 of 2002 which was disposed of by the High Cout dated 27-08-2002 . After that the charges were framed against him and a domestic enquiry was ordered to be conducted against him . In respect of same set of charges , the Respondent Bank preferred a complaint before the Central Crime Branch , Egmore which was registered as CrimeNo. 232/201 under Sections 379 and 420 IPC and numbered as CC No. 8960/2002 on the file of Additional ChiefMetropolitan Magistrate , Egmore . The Addl . Chief Metropolitan Magistrate delivered the judgement dated 09-02-2004 acquitting the petitioner from the criminal case . While so , the Respondent Bank in the Departmental Enquiry held that the charges framed against the petitioner were proved and the Enquiry Officer heavily placed reliance on the alleged confession statement given by the petitioner before the Police which has not been accepted by the Criminal Court and acquitted the petitioner from the criminal case. The said confession statement was obtained from thepetitioner out ofcoercion and threat, therefore the same should not have been taken on record in the domestic enquiry. As such , the reliance placed on so called confession statement by the Enquiry Officer is illegal and unwarranted and the whole findings rendered by the Enquiry Officer has to be rejected. Further , the Enquiry Officer instead of acting as a impartial person exhibited his personal bias and prejudice against the petitioner . He has acted more as a prosecutor than as an Enquiry Officer , therefore, the enquiry conducted is neither fair nor proper and the same is vitiated . The Disciplinary Authority without independently going into the case has accepted the report of the Enquiry Officer and imposed the punishment of Compulsory Retirement on the petitioner . Therefore, the punishment of Compulsory Retirement imposed by the DisciplinaryAuthority is illegal , unjustified and is also case ofvictimization and unfair labour practice . The petitioner had been made a scapegoat for no fault of his. When the Criminal Court has acquitted the petitioner, the findings of theEnquiry Officer that the charges were proved against the petitioner is perverse and bad in law. The findings of theEnquiryOfficer is based on presumptions , assumptions , surmises and conjectures and not based on the evidence on legal evidence available on record . The Appellate Authority did not apply his mind in its proper perspective . Now this Tribunal under the ID Act Section - 11A is empowered and competentto re - appreciate the entire evidence available on record and come an independent conclusion and , therefore , the petitioner prays this Tribunal to declare that the punishment imposed on him is illegal andunjustified and pass an award directing the Respondent Bank to reinstate him in service with continuity of service with backwages and all other attendant and consequential benefits.

4. As against this , the Respondent Bank in its

Counter Statement alleged the petitioner was last working

as a Clerk in Chintadripet Branch , Chennai . On 19-03-01 ,

whenSri Ravindran , Asstt . Manager was on leave and one

deputed to Chintadripet branch . He was looking after the Bank Pay Orders ( BPO/DDs ) . The BPOs are serially numbered and they are issued continuously on the basis ofserial order . When BPO after 4638 was to be issued , Sri Rajannoticed that BPO 4639 was missing and he informed the same to Smt. Padmavathy , Asstt . Branch Manager and when enquired the petitioner about the missing BPO , the petitioner pleaded ignorance . After that it was noted as cancelled in the BPO Register . On 2-4-2001 , the above said BPO 4639 for Rs . 3,50,000/- was presented through Canara Bank, Bangalore was received for clearance and it was found to be cancelled and the signatures of the Officers in the BPO were not genuine signatures! The Branch Manager made a complaint to the Addl . Dy. Commissioner of Police , Central Crime Branch , Egmore, Chennai . On 4-4-2001 , the Inspector Central Crime Branch - XIII called the Staff and Officers of Chintadripet Branch for interrogation and he has also obtained statement of all the staff members . In his statement , the petitioner confessed that on 07-03-2001 , Sri M. Ravindran , Clerk of Triplicane Branch of the Respondent Bank who left the service under Voluntary Retirement Scheme called on him at the Chintadripet branch and told him that as he was standing for election , he needs an unfilled BPO form and if the petitioner could get an unfilled BPO form , he will pay Rs . 5,000 . On 10-03-2001 when the Asstt . Manager , Mr. Ranganathan was talking over phone , the petitioner had stolen one BPO form and gave it to Ravindran and collected Rs . 5,000 . In the Police investigation , it is revealed that Ravindran gave the BPP to one Nagaraj who in turn gave it to some party for supply of timber from New Sri Lakshmi Saw Mill , Bangalore . Based on the confession made to the Police on 10-4-2001 , the petitioner was placed under suspension pending enquiry. In the meantime, the petitioner filed a WP before the Hon'ble High Court on 27-08-2002 . After that the Respondent issued Charge Sheet and conducted the enquiry. In the domestic enquiry , the 5thwitness of the prosecution viz . Sri Murthy spoke to the confession statement made by the petitioner to the Police to which he was a witness . Similarly, Sri Kannan , the 6th witness also spoke to the confession statement made by the petitioner before the Police and he has also stated that he had signed as a 2nd witness . One Sri R.M. Subramaniam , the 7th witness in the enquiry also confirmed the confession statement made by the petitioner . Relying on the statement given by the witnesses , the Enquiry Officer had come to the conclusion that the petitioner was guilty of the charges and after following the usual procedure , the Disciplinary Authority imposed a punishment of Compulsory Retirement on the petitioner . The punishment awarded to the petitioner is fullyjustified and valid in law. Though , three witnesses examined in the enquiry had spoken about the confession statement given bythe petitioner to the Police , the petitioner did not object to the same nor did he allege that the confession statement was obtained under threat or coercion . The provisions of Section-24, 25 & 26 of the Indian Evidence Act would not apply to the domestic enquiry proceedings , therefore , merely because the Criminal Court acquitted the petitioner without relying on the confession statement, it does not follow that the Enquiry officer should alsodo the same .

Sri K.L. Rajan, Asstt . Manager of Manali branch was [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

4533

भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 9 , 2008/ श्रावण 18 , 1930

Hence, for all these reasons , the Respondent prays that the claim may be dismissed with costs.

5. Pints for determination are :

( 1 ) Whether the action of the Respondent Management in awarding the punishment of Compulsory Retirement with superannuation benefits to the petitioner is just and legal ?

(2). To what relief is the petitioner entitled?

Act would not apply to the Domestic Eriquiry proceedings , therefore , merely because the Criminal Court acquitted the petitioner without relying on the corffession statement , it does not follow that the Enquiry Officer too should do the same and for this he relied on the rulings reported in 1996 10 SCC 659 KULDIP SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS . In that case, a Head Constable was interrogated during investigation into the murder of a Superintendent , ofPolice, the Head Constable admitting to have links with terrorists and working for thein: In that case, the Supreme . Court held " such admission/confession , although not admissible in a court of law, if found by the Disciplinary Authority to have been made voluntarily can rightly be acted upon by that authority and the court cannot examine the correctness of such opinion of the, Disciplinary Authority" . The Supreme Court further held " it is true that. a confession or admission , of guilt made by a person accused of an offence before oror while in the custody, of a PoliceOfficer is not admissible in a Court of La na Court of Law according to Section- 25 and 26 of the Evidence Act but it is equally well settled that these rules of evidence do not apply, to departmental enquiries wherein the only test is compliance with the principles of natural justice . motin this sense if theAppellant's confession is relevant , the fact that it was made to the Police whilewhile in the pustody of the Police may notbe of much consequence for the reason that strict rules ofEvidence Actdo not apply to Departmental Diselinary enquiries . It would be for the Disciplinary Authority todecide whether it is voluntary confession/admission.or . not. If the DisciplinaryAuthority comes to the conclusion that the statement was got voluntarily and true , he may well be entitled to act upon the said statement" 6. The petitioner questions the imposition of punishment by the Respondent Authorities viz . Compulsory Retirement . On the side of the petitioner no oral evidence was adduced but only one document viz, the copy ofthejudgement in CC No. 8960 of2003 was filed . On the side of the Respondent also no oral evidence was adduced but the enquiry proceedings was marked as Ex . Ml to Ex . M28 . Though , the petitioner has questioned the domestic enquiry as not fair and proper in the Claim Statement, no argument was advanced on the side of the petitioner in the arguments with regard to the domestic enquiry. Therefore , the main point to be decided in this case is whether the imposition of punishment given bythe Respondent Authority is just and proper . The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the Enquiry Officer instead of independently and objectively analyzing the evidence available on record in the light of the infirmities and contradictions emanated from theom the deposition of different witnesses , he simply brushed aside everything arnd held the petitioner guilty of the charges basing his reliance on the alleged confession statement given by the petitioner before the Police which has not been accepted by the Criminal Court and acquitted the petitioner; from the criminal case . He further argued in respect of ssme set of chargms the Respondent Bank preferred a complaint before the Central Crime Branch, Egmore which was numbered as CC No. 8960/2002 on the file ofAdd!. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and after full fledged trial, the Addl . Chief Metropolitan Magistrate delivered the judgement dated 09-02-2004 . The copy of the decision is marked as Ex . W1 in which he has acquitted the petitioner from the criminal case. It is his further argument that the Enquiry Officer failed to appreciate that the so -called confession statement was obtained from the petitioner by the Investigating Officer during the course of investigation out of coercion and threat and the so -called statement should not have been taken on record in the doméstic enquiry in the absence of the recipient examined as a witness . In this case , the Investigating Officer was not examined as witness in the domestic enquiry. Therefore, the reliance placed on the so-called confession statement by the Enquiry Officer is illegal, unwarranted and for this only reason, the whole findings rendered by the Enquiry Officer has to be rejected outright,

7. But as against this , the Respondent Counsel argued the Criminal Court having regard to the provisions ofSections -25 , 26 & 27 of the Indian Evidence Act declined to rely on the confession statement made by the accused to the Police but however such a restriction would not apply for the domestic enquiry . It is well settled the provisions of Sections - 24 , 25 and 26 of Indian Evidence

8. The next ruling relled on by the leamed counsel for the Petitioner is reported in 2006 ( 3 ) LLN 104 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE , NEW DELHI VS. NARENDER SINGH: In that case , the Respondent was enrolled as a Constable in the Delhi Police Station . A FIR was lodged against him for commission of an offence under Section -308 read with Section- 34 ofthe Indian Penal Code . An interrogation was made in which he confessed that whilehewas atCPR Vijay Ghat, he had committed theft of 2 revolvers and pistol and a charge sheet was issued against him for the offence in the Departmental Enquiry. The Enquiry Officer based on the confessional statement imposed a punishment and when the matter came up before the Supreme Court questioning the imposition of punishment, the Supreme Court has held " no question put to the witnesses to show that it was made on coercion and itwas not suggested that the said document was a forged or a fabricated one . So far as the evidentiary value ofthe said confession is concerned, we may notice that Section-25 of the Evidence Act and Section- 162 ofCode of Criminal Procedure provides for an embargo as regard admissibility of confession in criminal trial. The said provisions have per se no application in a departmental proceeding Therefore, the Tribunal as also the High Court were therefore not correct in arriving at the finding that the said confession was not admissible even in a departmental proceeding. " The Supreme Court further held " if the provisions of Evidence Act are not attracted in a departmental proceedings , a fortiori Sections -25 and 26 4534

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 9 , 2008/ SRAVANA 18 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

Ex . No. Date Description

10-12-2002 Proceedings of enquiry

13-12-2002

06-03-2003

21-03-2003

19-06-2003

Ex. M3 March 2001 Attendance Register of Chintadripet Branch for March 2001

shall not apply. Relying on the above two decisions , the learned counsel for the Respondent argued that in this case, three witnesses viz. MW5 to MW7 were examined with regard to the confession statement given by the concerned employee . The concerned employee has not disputed the fact that the confession statement was obtained by coercion or undue influence and put any question regarding to them to these witness and , therefore , the allegation made by the employee in this dispute is only an afterthought and the findings given by the Enquiry Officer cannotbe questioned by the petitioner on the ground that it is not admissible .

13-11-2000 Office Order dated 13-11-2000 Ex. M4 regarding work allocation w.e.f. 16-11-2000

Ex. M5 19-03-2001 B.P.O. Issue Register

Ex .M6 23-03-2001 Bankers Payment Order No. 004639 of Chintadripet Branch favouring "New Sri Lakshmi Vijaya Saw Mill " , Bangalore

Ex. M7 02-04-2001 Cheque Return Memo - Cheque No. 004639 for Rs . 3,50,000 returned fraudulent pay order

Ex. M8 FIRNo. 232/2002

Ex.M9 06-04-2001 Letter from Senior Manager , Chintadripet branch to General Manager, Indian Bank , R.O. , Chennai 9.I find much force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent since the learned counsel for the petitioner questioned the reliance by the Enquiry Officer on the confessional statement given by the concerned employee, I am ofthe opinion that this Tribunal cannot question the reliance placed by the Enquiry Officer on the confessional statement given by the concerned employee because the Enquiry Officer after careful consideration has come to the conclusion that the confessional statement is agenuine one and he has voluntarily admitted the fact in question . Therefore , I am not inclined to accept that the findings of the Enquiry officer is vitiated, as such, I find this point against the petitioner.

Ex.M10 04-04-2001 Statement of Sajjad Hussain PointNo. 2

Ex. M11 05-04-2001 Statement of Ranganathan

The next point to be decided in this case is to what reliefthe petitioner is entitled?

Ex. M12 05-04-2001 Statement of S. Kannan Ex.M13 Statement of RM Subramanyan

Ex. M14 05-04-2001 Statement ofGR. Samy

Ex. M 15 05-04-2001 Statement ofMK. Murthy

Ex.M16 05-04-2001 Statement of K.N. Rajaram Statement ofMrs. R. Padmavathy Ex. M17

10. Inviewofmy foregoing findings that the action of the Respondent Management in awarding the punishment ofcompulsory retirement with superannuation benefits isjustand legal , I find the petitioner is not entitled toanyrelief.

11. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly .

Ex. M18 14-07-2003 Presenting Officer's written submissions .

Ex. M19 26-09,2003 Petitioner's written submissions

Ex. M20 03-11-2003 Findings ofthe Enquiry Officer Dictated ' to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, correctedand pronounced by me in the open court on this daythe 25t June , 2008)

Ex. M21 26-12-2003 Letter of petitioner to the respondent K. JAYARAMAN , Presiding Officer

Ex .M22 18-05-2004 Notice of respondent issued to the Witnesses Examined:

None

Forthe I Party/Petitioner

: None

Forthe II Party/Management

petitioner calling for his explanation proposing punishment of compulsory retirement and fixing personal hearing on 29-05-2004 .

Documents Marked:

Proceedings of personal hearing Ex.M23 07-07-2004

Onthe petitioner's side

Date

Ex.No.

Description

Ex. M24 08-07-2004 Order confirming the punishment of compulsory retirement from service 09-02-2004 Judgement in CC No. 8960/2002

ExW1

Onthe Management's side

Ex. M25 18-08-2004 Appeal of petitioner against the order ofPunishment,

Date

Ex. No.

Description

24-10-2002 Charge Sheet issued to the Petitioner

Ex.Ml

Ex.M26 04-12-2004 Reply of respondent advising the petitioner to appearfor personal hearing on 23-12-2004

30-10-2002

Ex.M2

31-10-2002

Ex. M27 23-12-2004 Proceedings of personal hearing held on 23-12-2004,

13-11-2002

Ex. M28 17-02-2005 Order of the Appellate Authority. 29-11-2002

Printed by the Manager, Govt. of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi - 110054.