रजिस्ट्री सं० डी० एल० ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05
REGD. NO . D. L. ( N) 04/ 0007/2003-05 भारतका राजपत्र The Gazette of India
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 44]
नई दिल्ली, अक्तूबर 26 नवम्बर 1 , 2008 , शनिवार /कार्तिक 4- कार्तिक 10 , 1930
No. 44] NEW DELHI , OCTOBER 26- NOVEMBER 1, 2008, SATURDAY/KARTIKA KARTIKA 10, 1930 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग 11- खण्ड 3 - उप-खखण्ड (ii) PART II-Section 3 Sub -section (ii )
भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
विधि और न्याय मंत्रालय
( विधि कार्य विभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 20 अक्तूबर , 2008
का.आ. 2976, केंद्रीय सरकार दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता , 1973 ( 1974का 2 ) की धारा 24 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , सुश्री पूर्णिमा एच, कंठारिया , अधिवक्ता को, मुंबई स्थित उच्च न्यायालय में भारत संघ या केन्द्रीय सरकार के किसी विभाग या कार्यालय द्वारा या उसके विरूद्ध सभी दांडिक मामलों का जिसके अंर्तगत सभी दांडिक रिट याचिकाएं , दांडिक अपीलें , दांडिकं पुनरीक्षण , दाडिक निर्देश और दांडिक आवेदन भी हैं , संचालन करने के प्रयोजन के लिए इस शर्त के अधीन रहते हुए , कि सुश्री पूर्णिमा एच. कंठारिया , अधिवक्ता अपर लोक अभियोजक के रूप में अपनी पुनःनियुक्तिकी अवधि के दौरान भारत संघ या केन्द्रीय सरकार के किसी विभाग या कार्यालय के विरूद्ध ऊपर निर्देशित किसी दांडिक मामले में मुंबई स्थित उच्च न्यायालय में उपसंजात नहीं होंगी , तुरंत 4026 G1/08
(5981)
प्रभाव से एक वर्ष की अवधि के लिए या अगले आदेश होने तक , इनमें से जो भी पूर्वतर हो , अपर लोक अभियोजक के रूप में पुनःनियुक्त करती है ।
[ फा. सं. 23 ( 2 ) /2008-न्यायिक ] एम. ए. खान यूसुफी, संयुक्त सचिव और विधि सलाहकार MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE (Department of Legal Affairs) New Delhi , the 20th October , 2008
S.O. 2976.-In exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby re- appoints Ms. Poornima H. Kantharia , Advocate as Additional Public Prosecutor , for the purpose of conducting all criminal cases including criminal writ petitions , criminal appeals , criminal revisions, criminal references and criminal applications by or against the Union of India or any Department or Office of the Central Government in the High 5982
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 1 , 2008 /KARTIKA 10, 1930
Court ofJudicature ai Mumbai , with immediate effect , for a period of one-year or until further orders , whichever is earlier , subject to the condition that Ms. Poornima H. Kantharia, Advocate shall not appear against the Unionof India or any Department or Office of the Centrai Government in any criminal case referred to above in the High Court of Judicature at Mumbai during the period of het re-appointment .
[F. No. 23 ( 2 ) リリー M.A KHAN YUSUFI , J1 . Secy . & Legal Advo कार्मिक , लोक शिकायत पेंशन मंत्रालय ( कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 21 अक्तूबर , 2008
[PART H-SEC. 3 ( ii )] 365 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 ( Act No. 45 of 1860) relating to kidnapping abduction of Dr. P.C. Ram , thethenExecutive Director , FCI , N.E. Region , Guwahati , Assam and any other offence or offences , attempts abetments and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with above mentioned offences and any other offence/ offences committed in the course of same transaction arising out of the same facts and simultaneously launching of criminal prosecution against the guilty persons.
[No. 228/47/2007-AVD- II] CHANDRA PRAKASH , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, अवतूबर , 2008
का.आ. 2978 , केंद्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 (1974 का अधिनियम 22 की धारा 24 की उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, निम्नलिखित अधिवक्ताओं को धारवाड़, मंगलौर और गुलन्धर्ग, कर्नाटक राज्य में केंद्रीय अन्वेषण न्यूरो द्वारा उन्हें सौंपे गए परीक्षा न्यायालयों और अपीलों और इनसे उद्भूत अपीली न्यायालयों में दिल्ली विशेष, पुलिस स्थापना ( के.अ. ब्यूरो ) द्वारा संस्थित मामलों का मजानन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती हैं:-
क्रम सं. सर्वश्री
का.आ. 2977, केंद्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा दिल्ली विशष पुलिस स्थापना अडियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अर्धािनथम स. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पनित धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा पदत्त शक्तों का प्रयोग करते हुए, असम राज्य सरकार, राजनैतिक १ ९० दिसपुर की अधिसूचना सं. पीएलए, 486/2007/69 दिनांक 18 जुलाई 2008 द्वारा डाक्टर पी.राम तत्कालीन कार्यपालक निदशक एफसीआई, पूर्वोभर क्षेत्र गुवाहाटी , असम के उपहरण बन्नात अपहरण के संबंध में कामरूप जिले के पल्टन बाजार , पुलिशमें भारतीय दंड संहिता 1860 1860 का अधिनियम संभा 365 और 34 के तहतदनं मामला सं. 2008/2007 और से संबंधित अथवा संभवका प्रयत्नों , दुष्प्रेरणों और उसे संव्यवहार के अनुक्रः पे अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से अपराध अथवा अपधां का अन्वेषण करने के ि पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारि सम्पूर्ण असम राज्यभर करती है ।
[ 1228-47: 25
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIK GREVAMPS AND PENSIONS
(Deparatersonnel and Framing Newth: 21st October, 2008
S.O. 2977. sercase of the powers by sub - section { int Section 5 read with section on tay 1946) , the Central Government with the conser
Government of Assam , Polirical ( A ) Departam 2008 hereby extends the powers and jurisd
sized Delhi Special Ponce i tablishment Act , 19-461 /A vide Notification No Pl . 486/2007 :69 member of the Della Special Police Establishear the whole of the Side Assam for investig 1 offences re
District of
निर्यामल मामला सं. न्यायालय का नाम 1.
विशेष जज, धारवाड़ के. एल. पाटिल आरभी
18/0,102,04 ,
20/03 04/04
2 बी. विठ्ठल राय आरसी 16/21002
न्यायिक मुख्य मजिस्ट्रेट, मंगलौर 7. श्री अनुराधा एम आग्सः ५००2 देसाई प्रधान सिविल जज , गुलबर्ग
225/31/2008 - ए वी डी-- [ I ]
चंद्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव New Delhi, the October , 2008
Investigation in the trial courts and appeals revisions ar
ses in revisional S.O. 2978.--In ext of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 8 ) of Section of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act No 2 : 1974 ), the Central Govemment hereby appoints following; adsocates as Special Pubine Prosecutor for conducting mosecution in following cases instituted by the Delhi Spec al Pulice Establishment ( CBI) in the State of Karnataka an Dharwad , Mangalore an ! Gulbarga as entrusted to thein by the Central Bu her matters arising
petlate couns establis.
[ भाग - खण्ड 3 ( i ) ]
5983
भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 1 , 2008/कार्तिक 10 , 1930
Regular Case Nos. Name ofthe Court St S/Shri No.
1. KL. Patil
Special Judge Dharwad RC 31/01,18/01 02/04,26/03, &04/04.
2. B. Vittal Rai RC. 06/2002
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mangalore RC.25/2002
Principal Civil Judge, Gulbarga 3. Smt. Anuradha M.Desai
[No. 225/31/2008-AVD- IIJ CHANDRA PRAKASH , Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 23 अक्तूबर , 2008
का.अ. 2979.-केंद्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दण्ड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 ( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए श्री नदीम अख्तर खान , अधिवक्ता, कलकत्ता उच्च न्यायालय की बैंच पोर्ट ब्लेयर में केंद्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो के रिटेनर काउंसेल को कलकत्ता उच्च न्यायालय, पोर्ट ब्लेयर की पोर्ट ब्लेयर बैंच में विचारण न्यायालयों में दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना द्वारा संस्थित और केंद्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो द्वारा उन्हें सौपे गए मामलों के अभियोजन और पुनरीक्षण अथवाअपील न्यायालयों में इन मामलों से उद्धृत अन्य विषयों का संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
[सं. 225/32/2008 - एवोडी- II ] चंद्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd October, 2008
S.O. 2979. In exercise of the powers conferred by the provisions of sub -section (8 ) of section 24 of the Code ofCriminal Procedure , 1973 ( Act No. 2 of 1974), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Nadeem Akhtar Khan, Advocate , a Retainer Counsel of Central Bureau of Investigation , in the Port Blair Bench ofCalcutta High Court atPort Blair as Special Public Prosecutor , for conducting prosecution , appeals , revision or other matters arising out of the cases investigated by the Delhi Special Police Establishment in the Port Blair Bench ofCalcutta High Court atPortBlair.
[No. 225/32/2008-AVD- II ] CHANDRA PRAKASH, Under Secy.
वित्त मंत्रालय
( वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग )
नई दिल्ली , 24 अक्तूबर , 2008
का.आ. 2980,- रुग्ण औद्योगिक कंपनी ( विशेष उपबंध ) अधिनियम, 1985 की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 5 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वास , श्रीमती बीनू सेन को बाइफर में वरिष्ठतम सदस्य होने के कारण दिनांक 31-10-2008 से अगले आदेश होने तक बाइफर के अध्यक्ष के रूप में कार्य करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।
(फा. सं. 20( 1 )/2004- आईएफ -11 ] जे. एस. फौगाट, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Financial Services) NewDelhi , the 24th October , 2008
S.O. 2980. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (5) of Section 6 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 , the Central Government hereby authorises Smt . Binoo Sen, being the senior mostMember in BIFR to act as Chairman, BIFR from 31-10-2008 , until further orders.
[F. No. 20( 1 )/2004- IF - II ] J. S. PHAUGAT, Under Secy.
पर्यावरण एवं वन मंत्रालय आदेश नई दिल्ली , 24 अक्तूबर , 2008
" का.आ. 2981.-पर्यावरण ( संरक्षण ) अधिनियम, 1986 ( 1986 का 29 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और ( 3 ) में प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्द्वारा भारत के राजपत्र , असाधारण के भाग II , खण्ड 3 , उपखण्ड ( ii ) में दिनांक 29 मई, 2001 को प्रकाशित भारत सरकार , पर्यावरण एवं वन मंत्रालय के दिनांक 29 मई , 2001 के आदेश संख्या का.अ.583 ( अ ) में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्:-- 'उक्त आदेश के प्रारंभिक पैराग्राफ में-
( 1 ) क्रम सं. 3 और 12 के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित कम संख्याएं प्रतिस्थापित को जाएंगी , अर्थात्:-
"3. सदस्य ( नदी प्रबंधन ) , केन्द्रीय जल आयोग;
12. संयुक्त सचिव , जल संसाधन मंत्रालय । " ( ii ) क्रम सं. 8,9,10,11 , और 12 को क्रम सं. 10,11 , 12 , 13 और 14 के रूप में पुनःक्रमांकित किया जाएगा और क्रम संख्याओं को इस प्रकार पुनःक्रमांकित करने से पूर्व क्रम सं. 7 के पश्चात् निम्नलिखित प्रतिस्थापित जाएगा , अर्थात्ः-
" 8
संयुक्त सचिव ( भूमि संसाधन विभाग ) , ग्रामीण विकास मंत्रालय;
9.
संयुक्त सचिव ( हाइड्रो परियोजनाएं ) , विद्युत मंत्रालयः"
[फा. सं. जे -15011/ 8/2000 - एन आर सी डी- [ I ]
आर. के. वैश, संयुक्त सचिव THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 1,2008 KARTIΚΑ 10, 1931
5984
नोटः- मुख्य आदेश भारत के राजपत्र, असाधारण सं. का.आ.583(अ) . दिनांक 29 मई, 2001 के तहत प्रकाशित किया गया था और जिसे बाद में का.आ.सं. 635 ( अ ) , दिनांक 26 मई, 2004, का.आ. 728 ( अ ) , दिनांक 25 मई, 2005 और का.आ.751 ( अ ) , दिनांक 26 अप्रैल, 2007 के तहत संशोधित किया गया था ।
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS
ORDER
New Delhi , the 24th October, 2008
$.O. 2981 .-- In exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-sections ( 1 ) and (3 ) of section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act , 1986 (29 of 1986 ), Central Govertonent hereby makes the following amendments in the Order of the Government of India in the Ministry of Ervironment and Forests , number S.O. 583 (E ), dated the 29th May, 2 ( H) 1 published in Part II , Section 3, Sub - Section (ii) ofthe Gazette of India, Extraordinary , dated the 22nd June , 2001, namely In the said Order, in the opening paragraph ,- (i) for serial numbers 3 and 12, the following serial numbers shall be substituted, namely:--
"3. Member (River Management ) , Central Water Commission ;
12. Joint Secretary , Ministry of Water Resources" .
(ii) the serial numbers 8 , 9, 10, 11 and 12 shall be renumbered as serial numbers 10, 11 , 12 , 13 and 14 and before the serial numbers are so numbered, the following shall be inserted after serial number 7, namely :-
"8 Joint Secretary (Department ofLand Resources ). Ministry of Rural Development;
9. Joint Secretary (Hydro Projects ) , Ministry of Power;"
[F. No. J- 15011 /8/2000 - NRC ). [ [ ] R.K. VAISH . Jt . Savy.
Note: The Principal Order was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary vide number SO 583 ( E ) , dated the 20th May, 2001 and subsequently amended vide SO 63 ( E) . dated the 26th May , 2004 , S.O.No. 728 (E ), dated the 25t: May, 2005 and S. 751 ( E ) , dated the 26th April , 2017
कोयला मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 22 अक्तूबर, 2008
का.आ. 2982. - केन्द्रीय सरकार, कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) , जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है , की धारा 19 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निदेश देती है कि चूंकि वह कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का कोलागू कर रही है तथा विद्युत मंत्रालय की ओर से यशवर्ती कांयला खनन प्रयोजनों के लिए विद्युत मंत्रालय के अधीन सार्वजनिक क्षेत्र उपक्रम अर्थात् नेशनल थर्मल पावर कारपोरेशन लि. ( एनटीपीसी 'ग्न.) को आबंटित कोयला ब्लाकों की भूमि का अर्जन कर रहांला
PART I-SA: S लि. ( एनटीपीसी लि.) को आर्बन कोदला ब्लाकों के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित भूमि रंतु भृ स्त्रामियों अथवा भू-वौचतों को प्रतिकर की अदायगी के सीत्रण के लिए उक्त अधिनियम को धारा 17 के अधीन उसके द्वारा प्रयोग में लाई जा सकेगी या निर्वहन की गई शक्तियों अथवा का प्रथ का निसंहन निम्नलिखित शर्तों को अधीन विद्युत्त मंत्रालय द्वारा भी किया जाएगा , यदि-
( i ) कोयला ब्लाक कांगण मंत्रालय द्वारा आबंटित है या हैं:
(ii ) कोयला धारक भूमि उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जिन कीजा रही है;
(iii ) विद्युत मंत्रालय राज्यसरकार की पुनर्स्थापन तथा उसके उप - प्रतिनिधि की उपयुक्त नीति का पालन करना होगा ; ( iv) भू- स्वामियों अथवा भनिनों को प्रतिकार की अदायगी केन्द्र सरकार के विद्यमान मानदंड के अनुसार की जाएगी:
(v ) प्रतिकर के सभी विवादों का निपटान उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन गठित अधिकरण द्वारा किया जाएगा । अधिकरण के विनिश्चन्य अंतिम होंगे और विद्युत मंत्रालय पर चाध्यकर होंगे और ( vi ) अधिकरण का राजन्य व्यय विद्युत मंत्रालय द्वारा ममाने अनुपात में साझा किया आएगा ।
[फा. सं. 430.20. 28 : 2007 पीआरआईडब्ल्ল্ম -1 | एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF COAL
New Delhi , the 2nd October , 2008
S.O. 2982. -1n ex . reise of the powers conferred by section 19 ofthe Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisition and Development) Act, 195711957 ) , hereinafter referred to as the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that, since it is administering the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Developrint Act, 1957 ( 20 of 1957 ) atid acquiring the land of coa . blocks allocated to National Thermal Power Corporate Limited ( NTPCLimited . a Public Sector Undertaking subordinate to the Ministry of Power , for captive coat mining purposes on behalf of the Ministry of Power , all or any of the powers or duties which may be exercised or discharged by it under section 17 of the said Act for disbursement of payment of compensation tt) land owners or oustees and acquired under the said Act , in respect of coal blocated to National Themat Power Corporation Led ( NIPC Limited ) , shall be exercised or discharged alw by the Ministry of Power onder the following.condition .
( i) the Coal Blocks orbe allocated by the Ministry ofCoal;
( ii) the coal bearir... is being acquired under the Said Act;
( iii ) the Ministry of Power or its sub -delegate shall adhere to the Resettlement and Rehabilitauon policy of the approriate State Governati
(iv) compensationment to the land owners or stees shall be made asetailing norms of the Central lovemment :
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) )
5985
भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 1 , 2008 कार्तिक 10, 1930
(v) all disputes of compensation shall be settled by the Tribunal set up under the said Act . The decisions of the Tribunal shall be final and binding on the Ministry of Power, and
(vi ) the revenue expenses of the Tribunal shall be shared by the Ministry of Power in equal proportion.
[F.No. 43020/28/2007 -PRJW - 1 ] M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy .
इस्पात मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 27 अक्तूबर, 2008
का.आ. 2983.-केन्द्रीय सरकार पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( क) के अनुसरण में नीचे दी गई अनुसूची के स्तंभ ( 1 ) में उल्लिखित व्यक्तियों को उक्त अनुसूची के स्तंभ ( 2 ) में तत्संबंधी प्रविष्टि में विनिर्दिष्ट क्षेत्रों में उक्त अधिनियम के तहत सक्षम प्राधिकारी के रूप में कार्य करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।
अनुसूची
प्राधिकारी
क्षेत्रीय अधिकारिता (1)
(2)
जिला- क्योंझर, उड़ीसा विशेष भूमि अर्जन अधिकारी , डी. बी. रेल लिंक जिला- क्योंझर , उड़ीसा , पिन- 758001
[सं. 11 (51 )/2007- आई डी डब्ल्यू] यू. पी. सिंह, संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF STEEL New Delhi , the 27th October , 2008
S.O. 2983.- In pursuance of clause (a) ofsection 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1.962 ), the Central Government hereby authorises the authority mentioned in colum ( 1 ) of the Table below to perform the functions of the competent authority under the said Act in the area specified in the corresponding entry in column (2 ) ofthe said table.
TABLE
Territorial jurisdiction Authority
(2)
(1)
Spl. Land Acquisition Keonijhar District in the State ofOrissa.
Officer, D.B. Rail Link Keonijhar District, Orissa, Pin-758001.
[No. 11 (51 )/2007 -IDW]
U. P. SINGH , Jt . Secy.
विद्युत मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 23 अक्तूबर , 2008
का.आ. 2984. केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ( संघ केशासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम (4) के अनुसरण में पावरग्रिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया लि. , गुडगांव तथा रूरल इलेक्ट्रीफिकेशन कारपोरेशन लि. , नई दिल्ली के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन कार्यालयों को, जिनके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारीवृंद ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है:
L. पावरग्रिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया लि. , 400/220 के. वी. उप केंद्र गांव दबोदा खुरड, झझर मार्ग , बहादुरगढ़ , जिला झझर ( हरियाणा ) -124507 2. पावरग्रिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया लि. , एससीओ 259 , द्वितीय तल, सैक्टर-44सी , चंदीगढ़ । 3. पावरग्रिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया लि. , चम्बा पूलिंग स्टेशन, न्यूसंजीवनी हास्पिटल बिल्डिंग , खजियार रोड सुल्तानपुर, चम्बा( हि.प्र. ) -176314 4.
रूरल इलेक्ट्रीफिकेशन कारपोरेशन लि. , पूर्वोत्तर आंचलिक कार्यालय , एकमार्ड बिल्डिंग, ब्लॉक - 14/2 , सीआईटी स्कीम- VIII ( एम ) , उल्टाडांगा ,कोलकाता -700067
[सं. 11017/1 /2007 - हिंदी ] आई. सी. पी. केशरी, संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF POWER New Delhi , the 23rd October , 2008
S.O. 2984. In pursuance of Sub Rule ( 4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language ( use of official pursposes of the union) Rules, 1976 the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices under the administrative control ofPowergrid Corporation of India Ltd. , Gurgaon and Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd., New Delhi , the staff where of have acquired 80 % working knowledge of Hindi:-
1. Powergrid Corporation of India Ltd., 400/220 KV Sub-Station, Village Daboda Khurd , Jhajhar Marg , Bahadurgarh , Distt. Jhajhar (Haryana) -124507.
2. Powergrid Corporation of India Ltd., SCO 259, 2nd Floor, Sector -44 C, Chandigarh.
3. Powergrid Corporation of India Ltd. , Old Sanjeevani Hospital Building , Khajiar Road, Sultanpur, Chamba (HP ) -176314.
4. Rural Electrification Corporation Lad., Eastem Zonal Office, ICMARD Bulding, Block - 14/2, CIT Scheme-VIII (M) , Ultadanga, Kolkata-700067.
[No. 11017/ 1/2007-Hindi ] I. C. P. KESHARI ,Jt. Secy.
5986
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 1, 2008/KARTIKA 10, 19.31.
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ) उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय
( उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )
भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो
नई दिल्ली, 8 अक्तूबर, 2008
का.आ. 2985.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ख) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( कों) में संशोधन किया गयाः किये गये हैं:-
अनुसूची
संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि
संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि संशोधित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष औरशीर्षक
क्रम संख्या
(2)
(1)
(3)
(4)
07-10-2008
3. मई 2007
ओई एस 7372: 1995 , मोटर वाहनों के लिए सोसा- अम्लकी भंडारण बैटरियों विशिष्टि (पहला पुनरीक्षण)
इस भारतीय संशोधन की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो. भानक भवन, 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर भानं , नई दिल्ली 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भांगल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर पटना , पूर्ण तथा तिरूवनन्तःपुरम में बिकी हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[ संदर्भ ई टो 11 /टी -60]
प्रकाश बचानी , वैज्ञानिदेशक ) विद्युत तकनीकी विभाग MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS . FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
(Department of Consumer Affairs )
BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS
New Delta. the 8 October , 2008
S.O. 2985. In pursuance ofclause (b ) of sub rule ( 1) ofRule 7 of the Bureau of Ini Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standard hereby notifies that amendinent to the Indian Standards , particulars of which is given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued:
MHEDULE
SI . No.
No & year of the Amendment
No. & Year ofthe Indian Standard
Date from which the Amendment shall have effect
(2)
(3)
(4)
( 1)
1
07-10-2008
3. May 2007
IN 7372: 1995, Lead Acid Storage Batteries for Motor Vehicles - Specification (FirstRevision )
Copy ofthisArnendment is available with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9. Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch offices: Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur. Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna , Pune and Thiruvananthapuram,
[Ref: ET11 /1-61 )]
PRAKASII BACHANI , Sc . E ( Director ) Electrotechnical Department [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
5987 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 1 , 2008/कार्तिक 10 , 1930
नई दिल्ली, 10 अक्तूबर , 2008
का.आ. 2986.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मामक ब्यूरो एतद्द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वह स्थापित हो गया है:
अनुसूची
स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों) की संख्या
स्थापित तिथि क्रम संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक
नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
31 अगस्त 2008 । आई एस /आई ई सी 60034-8: 2002 पूर्णी विद्युत मशीनें भाग 8 टर्मिनल चिन्हांकन और पूर्णो की दिशा (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)
इस भारतीय मानक की एक प्रति भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखों कार्यालयों अहमदावाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में विकी हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[संदर्भ : ईटी 15 /टी -18 ]
प्रकाश बचानी , वैज्ञा. - ई ( निदेशक ) विद्युत तकनीकी विभाग
New Delhi , the 10th October , 2008
S.O. 2986.-In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies the Indian Standards to the Indian Standards , particulars ofwhich is given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued:
SCHEDULE
Sl . No.
Date ofEstablished
No. & Year ofthe Indian Standards
No. & year of the Indian Standards , if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard
( 1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
31 August , 2008
JS/IEC 60034-8: 2002 Rotating electrical machines Part 8 Terminal markings and direction ofrotation (Second Revision)
Copy of this standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.
[Ref: ET 15/T- 18]
PRAKASH BACHANI , Sc . E (Director) Electrotechnical Department
पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैम मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली , 31 अक्तूबर , 2008
का. आ. 2987... भारत सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962का 50 ) ( जिसे इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के 5988
[ PART 1 ] -SEC. 3 ( ii )] TIIE GAZETTE OF INDIA NOVEMBER 1 , 2008 /KARTIKA 10. 193
पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना मल्गा का. आ. 67 तारीख 7 जनवरी , 2008 द्वारा एस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि । मैलसं रिलायन्स गैस ट्रान्सपोर्टेशन इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा देश के विभिन्न हिस्सा में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए काकीनाडा-हैदराबाद उरान अहमदाबाद गै गइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यांग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;
और, एक गजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतिया जनताकोख 23 जून, 2008 को अथवा उसगं पहले उलब्ध कर दी गई थीं ;
और पाऊपन्नाइन बिछाने के संबंध में जनता को और से प्राप्त आक्षेपों पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा विचार कर लिया गया है और अननुज्नात कर दिया गया ।
और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धाग की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत मरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है :
और, भारत सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने लिए अपेक्षित है . उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने की पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के विनिश्चय किया है;
अतः अत्र, भारत सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धाग को उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयंगर करते हुए, यह घोषणा करतो है कि इस अधिगृधना में संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में जइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग को अंधकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;
और, भाग्न सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा को उपधारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग कर अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तत्र से भारत सरकार में निहित्त होने के बजाए सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, मैमर्स रिलायन्स गैस ट्रान्सपोर्टशन इन्फ्रान्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड , में निहित हागा ।
अनुसूची
भरूच
तहसील : हांसोट
य : गुजरात
गांव का नाम
सर्वे नम्बर ब्लॉक नं
आर. ओ. बू, जिभ करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल
चौ.मी.
हेक्टेयर
एयर
2
1
3
143/9
1. मांगरोल
20
00
47 2. पर्वत
00
118/31
ㅣ고
00
27.3
00
41
10 3. उत्राज
102
(1)
18
00
400
00
306
$1
00
7)
00
17
(X)
4. शहरा
338
زاد
0
337
וגז
78 327
(1)
88
00
00
05
285
01
00
00
55
00
286
00
57
00
!!
06
00 [ भाग 1 ]- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
5989
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 1, 2008/कार्तिक 10 , 1930
1
2
281
5. ओभा
423/अ
482
6. कलम
204
231/अ
231/ब
223
167/भ
169
216
तहसील : भरूच
जिला : भरूच गांव का नाम
सर्वे नम्बर/ब्लॉक नं
2
1
386
1. भाडभूत
जिला : भरूच तहसील : वागरा
गांव का नाम
सर्वे नम्बर/ब्लॉक नं
2
81
1. आंकोट
3
4
5 00
14
50
76
04
00
37 00
02
14
00
58
15
00
24 00
02
33 00
59
이
00
%
08
00
07
31
70 00
02
राज्य : गुजरात
आर. ओ. यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर
चौ.मी.
एयर
4
3
5 00
07
10
राज्य : गुजरात
आर. ओ. यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल हेक्टेयर
चौ.मी.
एयर
4
3
5 00
23
86
[फा. सं एल- [ 40] 4/54/2004- जी.पी. ] के. के. शर्मा, अवर सचिव
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi , the 31st October , 2008
S.O. 2987. Whereas by notification of Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 67 dated 7th January, 2008, issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 ofthe Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition ofRight ofUser in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , Government of India declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land , specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Kakinada- Hydrabad- Uran - Ahmedabad gas pipeline for transportation of natural gas by M/ s . Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited to Consumers in various parts of the country;
And, whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were, made available to the public on or before 23rd June, 2008; And, whereas , the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the Competent Authority;
And, whereas , the Competent Authority has , under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted reportto Government of India;
And, whereas , Government of India after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the Right of User therein;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, Government of India hereby declares that the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And, further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub - section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act , Government of India herebydirects that the Right ofUser in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in Government of india vest, on the date of publication of the declaration , in Mis. Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited free from all encumbrances .
BOOS KARTIΚΑΤΩ :
0565
::
Metrice Ev
Tehsil :
State:Guj
Name of the
Area to be acquire
octare
1
1. Man
2 Parsa
il
12
12
住!
::
10
אני
4. Shaker
ره
15
00
sri
Si
SOLA
h . Kale.
aj
Tehs:
Arva in
NAT
3
!
(%)
121
?
Arca
TA
100451261
MA 5991 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 1 , 2008/कार्तिक 10 , 1930
श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 30 सितम्बर, 2008
(d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A) of Section Iu ofthe Industrial Disputes. Act, 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
"Whether by the Management of Kustore Area of M/ s. BCCL in dismissing Shri Naval Kishore Azad from service from 18-11-1998 is proper legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
का. आ. 2988, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी. सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण श्रम मंत्रालय संख्या । धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 220/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 30-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-20012/236/2000- आई आर ( सी स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMEN New Delhi , the 30th September, 2008
S.O. 2988.--In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 220 / 2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , No. 1 , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s. BCCL and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 30-9-2008 .
2. The workman has filed written statement stating that Naval Kishore Azad was a permanent workman in Hurriladill Colliery under Kustore Area ofM's . BCCL and he was working as Minor/ Loader and performed his dury satisfactorily and never neglected his duty . He became seriously ill on 24-2-1997 and he was suffering from fatal discase . He had informed the management regarding his illness . The Workman was under medical treatment of Dr. B.K. Singh , the Civil Assistant Surgeon ofKenduadih. Dhanbad from 24-2-1997 to 11-12-1997 . The management served him a charge- sheet on 25-12-1997 during, his treatment. The concerned workman replied to the charge -sheet on 15- 1-1998. When he cured from his disease he requested to the authority concerned to resume his duty but the management denied to resume his dury, and he was dismissed from services w.e.f. 18-11-1998 . The matter was referred to the A.L.C. ( C ) , Dhanbad for reinstatement in his service , but the conciliation proceeding was encled in failure . Thereafter the matter has been referred by the appropriate Authority to this Hon'ble Tribunal for adjudication .
[No. L-201012/236/2000 - IR ( C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALNO - 1 , DHANBAD
Ithas been statect that the ( dismissal from services of the concerned workman is illega 1 , arbitrary . improper and unjustified, so he has played to reinstate him in service with full back wages .
In the matter of a reference U/s . 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947,
Reference No. 220/2000
Rejoinder has been filed by the workman stating the same thing and it has been stated that the copy of enquiry proceeding was not supplied to the workman on 9-10-1998 / 6-11-98 and the concerned workm an was dismissed from service on 18-11-1998 .
Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Hurrıladın Colliery of Kustore Area of M/ s . B.C.C. Ltd.
AND
Their Workmen
Present Shri H M. Singh , Presiding Officer .
APPEARANCES
For the Employers : Shri H.Nath , Advocare .
For the Workman
Shri R.R. Ram, Joint General Secretary, B.M.U.
State : Jharkhand : Industry: Coal
Dated, the 8th September , 2008
AWARD
3.The management has filed wwritten statement stating that the reference is not maintainable on facts and law both . The workman is a permanent employee of the management and was designated as minor /loader . The concerned workman was issued chargesheet for unauthorised absence from duty with effect from 24-2-1997 under Section 26.1.1 . of the Certified Standing Orders of the Company vide letter No. BCCLL/ HRC / 97 / 1336 dated 25-12-1997 oftheAgent Manager , Hurriladih Colliery . The concerned workman submitted his explanation whichwas not found satisfactory and it was decided by the management to conduct a dormestic enquiry and accordingly an Enquiry Officer was appointed and notice of enquiry was served on the concerned workman vide letter No. 1382, dated 7-1-1998 . The concerned workman fully participated in the enquiry was conducted according By Order No. L- 20012 / 236/ 2000- ( C- 1 ) , dated, the 24th July. 2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, has , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by clause 5992
THE GAZETITE OF INDEA
PART II SEC. 3( j
101,2008/KARTIKA 10 , 1
to the rules of normal justice . The Enquiry Officer tod charges levelled against the workman coneri
bmitted bis teport established beverla
enq proceeding d management
red to the wik
enquiry reput
vide letter No. 1251, dated 16-11-1998 arou
the contents within 15 days . The workman
submitted his contents on the repeat , which a indo
the gravity of D
satisfactory. Keepngosi..
to terminate he itwas decided
from the compa and aveordingly he was disannssed t the service vidi No. 1384 , dated 18-11-1098.
concerned wor : itsed an industrial dispute berors A.L.C. ( C) , Dh..shad which was numbered as 19ב ...
The Dy. Chief Pennel Manager , Kustore Arca on r
) . Dhanbad (lated 13-9-1999 vid ofletter from A.
No. BCCI /KA/ Tiscipline 99 explained the facts of the d and prayed for dropping the proceeding . The present reference is outcome of this dispute.
In the rejoinder it has been stated that the concerned workman fully participated in the enquiry proceeding und he was given foll opportunity by the Enquiry Officer to defend himself At no stage he complained to the management or to the Enquiry Ofticer regarding conduct ofthe Enquiry Officer . Keeping in view of gravity of oneние , the concerned workman was rightly dismissed from servi.r . It has been prayed that award he passed in Ente management .
4. The workman was produced W Kishore Azad and he proved Ext . Wot certifie Dr. B.K. Singh and regarding informataas te t management about hus illness , fat . W- 2, W- 21 and joining letter under his signature, Ext . W- 3 The managemem has proved Ext . M - 1 . charge decet , Ext. M- 2 reply to the chargesheet submitted by the concemed workman , Ext. M- 3 paper regarding enquiry . Ext . M -4 enquiry proceeding and Ext. M - 5 enquiry reposм. Ем. M-6 letter regarding proceeding report and list 31-7 dismissal lerter dined 18-11-1998.
5.It has becu argued by representative 1 1 workman that he was formed regarding his illness ... the management . But in cross - examination WW- I stated that he had joined duty in the year 1990. He performed diay lo the year 1995 only for 54 days , in the year 1996ouls Ke days and in the year 1997 he performed dut on! days. 11 shows that the workman is not interested t to the management and he was a habitual absenter 6. The paper liled by the workman, Ext . W-!, urd by Dr. B.K Singh for medical treatment dated 24-2-1997 shows that he got such type of treatmut which is not any serious illness during th wid that he w from 24-2-1997 to 111
!
no x -ray or clinicalt
he was actually ill . The red workman has not given any paper to show that is treatment in the hospital of the management. Paper the workman , certificate Annexure- 1 dated 11-12 Fitness certificate which shows that he was suffer.CUT.I.is not such type ofdisease and it she he was not suffering from any serious illness . Mi erany enquiry proceedings are before this Court , ila
the Doctor under whom ! ! he should have produced bu treatment, Dr. B.K. Singh so that it can be believ was unkler his treatwal
by such Doctor.Wuhout and certificate has beer.
producing and proving:. ...sticate has got no value in the eye of law and on ti the management cannot believe that the concern. at was really ill . The paper filed by the managemmers report , Ext M -4 shows that the concerned workianted his guilt According to his statment he was wi nly 54 days in a year in 1995 .
65 days in the year 1946 days in the year 1997. 11 shows his conduct that was habitual absentee in performing his duty . It circunistances , it shows that after proper enquiry he wa missed on sufficient ground as per Certified Standing Clause 26.1.1
M/ s. B.C.C.L. in dismissi: Nawal Kishore Azad from 7.Accordingly, I red the following Award The action of the massment of Kustore Area service from 18-11-1968 ll justified. Hence , the concemed workman is gitted to any rehet .
M SINGH, PresidingOfficer नई दिगम्बर , 2008
विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 का, आ. 2989.-
अनुकरण में केंन्द्रीय सरकार है. बी. (1947 का 14 ) की धारा !
यात्रकरें और उनके कर्मकानें मी.सी.एल. के प्रर्यधतंत्र को
बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट अत्रिनाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय । धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 116/94) को प्रकाशिता है. जो कंन्द्रीय सरकार को 30-9-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ
[सं. ए 271/92 आई आर ( या । लती जंत्राम, दृस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , Septonber . 2008 S.O. 2989. In suthee of Section 17 ot a
17 ( 14 of 1947 , the tentral Industrial Disputes Act
Government hereby puttine award ( Ret . No 116441
cestral Tribunai - cumabour ofthe Central Governanec
as shown in the Annexure in C'ourt , No. 1 , Dhanbad now the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Si. 4. and their workman , wincli was received by the Cerverament on 301-9-2 ( 108
1-20012-271 92-180-1 JA JAWAS . Desk Oficer [भाग ॥- खण्ड 3 ( ⅱ ) ]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALNO. - 1 , AT DHANBAD
PRESENT
Shri H. M. Singh, Presiding Officer.
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) ofthe I. D. Act , 1947.
Reference No. 116. of 1994
PARTIES : Employers in relation to the management of Govindpur Area No. III of M/ s . B.C.C.L. , P.O. Sonardih , Distt. Dhanbad.
AND Their Workman
APPEARANCES
On behalf of the Workman : Mr. S. N. Goswamy,
Advocate.
Onbehalfof theEmployers Mr. D.K. Verma,
Advocate.
State: Jharkhand
Industry: Coal Dated, the 9th September, 2008 .
AWARD
The Government of India Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under section 10( 1 )(d) ofthe Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 has referred the followingdispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/271 / 1992-1R( C-I ) dated the 6th May , 1994.
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the Management of the General Manager, Govindpur Area ofM /s BCCL . P.O. Sonardih, Distt . Dhanbad in terminating the services of Shri Putul Harin Sweeper w.e.f. January 1989 is justified? If not , to what relief in the concerned workman entitled? "
2. The case of the workman as per W. S. filed by the sponsoring union on behalf of the concerned workinan is that Smt. Putul Aarif, Sweeper was appointed for maintenance and cleaners of Sinidih Officer's colonywhere bunglows of 28 officers and 200 cmployed quarters and Kendriya Vidyalaya situated . It has been stated that the quarters and Vidyalaya used to be controlled and supervision of Govindpur Area No. III of M/s . BCCL and only five sweepers have been appointed in permanent roll and live sweepers were not sufficient for maintaining and cleaning that area . As per case of the workman Smt . Putul Harin, the concerned workman and other person Shri Premlal were appointed at Govindpur Arca in the year 1983 for the purpose of cleaning bunglows , quarters and Kendriya Vidyalaya, on the basis of approval obtained from Koyala Bhawan, the Headquarters of M/s . BCCL on 30-11-1983 and its subsequent renewal on 25-5-1984. The job assigned tothe concerned workman was to maintain cleaning latrines , ash pits, drain of bunglows , quarters sweeping Road and class rooms . She worked continuously and uninterruptedly since January , 1983 to December, 1988 and has put attendancemore than 240 days in each calendar year under direct control and supervision of the management. It has
5993
भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 1 , 2008 / कार्तिक 10, 1930
been further stated that due to her continuous demand for permanent regularisation the management have stopped the work of the concerned workman from January, 1989 suddenly without any notice , show cause or reasons violating the provisions of Section 25F of the I.D. Act , 1947. Thereafter the concerned workman placed several representations and physically aproached before the authority concerned and discussions were also held at various levels between the authority concerned and the representatives of the union on 1-6-1990, 28-6-1990, 1-7-1990, 20/24-12-1990, 21-3-1991 , 19-7-1991 and 14-8-1991 . But inspite ofthe representations made to the managenient the concerned workman has been deprived ofher livelihood. As per the W.S. of the workman the concerned workman has been treated as Badli worker whereas she oughtto have been treated as regular and permanent workman . The workman side also reproduced para 7.5 of the Certified Standing Order of M /s . BCCL . Thereafter the sponsoring union of the concerned workman raised industrial dispute before the ALC( C) Dhanbad which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication . It has been prayed on behalf of the workman 10 pass an Award in favour of the concerned workman Smt . Putul .
3. Management has also filed W.S. in which they have stated that the concerned lady Smt. Putul Harin , worked as Badli Sweeper during the period of leave and sick vacancies of permanent Sweeper deployed at Central School during the period from November , 1983 to May, 1985 . It has been stated by the management that the sponsoring union raised industrial dispute before the ALC ( C ) Dhanbad where the management produced all relevant records and it was found that she had put total number of 234 days of attendance . The Central Government vide notification No. 1.-20012(271 )/ 1992-1R( Coal -1 ) dated 13-9-1993 rejected the dispute as not it for reference on the ground that Smt. Putul Harin worked against leave and sick vacancy intermittently for 234 days from November, 1983 to May, 1985 only. After clousre of the above dispute the present reference has been made behind the back of the management completely on different terms , probably on the basis of some wrong information given by the sponsoring union . It has been asserted by the management that the reference is prima facie illegal and void and cannot be adjudicated . It has been submitted on behalf of the workman that the Certified Standing Order ofthe Company became applicable from 12-10-1990 and the concerned lady is claimingto have been stopped from her duties in January, 1989. Thus her case is not covered within the provisions of the Certified Standing Order of the Company.It has also been stated that a Badli workman does not have any right to continue in employment as her term of employer is for a particular period of leave and sick vacancy existing in place of some permanent workman . They have accordingly submitted to pass an Award holding that the concerned lady is not entitled to get any relief.
4. Management side also filed rejoinder in which they have admitted contents of some of the paras of the W.S. of the Workman . They have denied that the concerned workınan has put 240 days attendance in any calander year as the concerned workman worked on leave and sick 5994
vacancy. Acco
Award rejecim!
de has a
appears that th.
5. The s
case of the
works :
concerned lat
producedMW
6. 11 bas
workman thai !
year and he is er....
theCertified
ompany Pud Se
: 1-4 .
I.D. Act . He h
ihas worked card during the abow
thân 240 day
pied under
violating the p
es has been to
the L.D. Act
to reuistate ti
management ,
workman with
a completen
has argued thai :
and in the co
A1 : 1985. Sab
November . 1
Othe workman
regularised.
115 has been
sisich Howmble Sqr .
laiddown the fi
Industrie
A 147 Sc .
25 -Fam!: mplover has to it .
rendering
service .......
B. this c
retrench :
int !.
fortheun .
retrench:
mmandone !!!....
:
and com ...... as per sec J - Fri
closing d
Ld . Cocokman reter
reported in 2000 in whier Re :.
wing:
Court laiddown the
Act, 1947 Secte
Industri ...
worknu
means a persone causal
working in lac
adl worker i.
agreeme::.
absorbe
mpletes 240 iesa months.has rendered serder
for more than 2
oftempor
to treach
ali for absoрвол
Or compensare 1 :
to be regalaris
workolan has not
In the pre
orkman also referre days in a yea
Page 181 2:
decision reporte
Kerala High Court it down the following .
"Industrie ! 1.es Act, 1947 Suc and 25 achment of Sweepeт, виси
pot justified . Order cre worker, wheed continuously for a held , on
reinstatemenilis back wages and benefits, bel as valid. "
Manages cierred Una De
S.C.C. - 1 , 2006 281
:
7. in this respect WW- Thus stated examination at have any paper with that I was appointed in the year 1983 , and in
!
AAR
krow wiesberd
12
weeding any enqui bmitted or not with a from 1983 to 1985 :
3. Her shadenec
s issued to her. No nas worked only for 231 AIW- 1 stated that the:
selt has s
Leries of Geaщерог Cerda Callery tesof there are sup The absorsed
Cistus of Le
ALM L. So seron takli Sweepers in the ( closed long ago . At pro Area , namely , Dharm :: South Govindpur Colli Collieries ofCGovindpu ! thouwr in every departme 31 Sweeper so that preser ounsel for the танадаг cad arisen and the Gr exter dated30-9-190.31 . and relerence has been . reference cannot be ljudication by this C at the argument on the
Barbas He ! cintons Servic weekly holkias : days Gely wr Goys are comptes period on oll Sti 4 service cice ot the post As post of Sweene reinstatement st als 9. As per law ported in l.ab I.C. THigh Court held that 210 days--He does no paid holidays for devi workman is monthly r . calculating 240 days 1 : Hon'ble Supreme tou ind down regarding Labour Court canni rer evidence of many so this Court cannou oncernedworkmun . li . 2008 page 1739 laid des
1943 S. 251 ak Fr 210dys Prod as fotos for vich capeal ou a part aquarement for ? 1 . Fre by employee Min and his mother 404 to employee Pea employee was o meorrect by [ ribunal Pual that terminador legal and consequrm de.
"Industrial Dis Retrenchment-- Employee was re heworkeddaih staled that emmp basis dependin: hours periodic also being don appointment by employer th:: ! sanctioned post r .. High Court Fan : of employee tre . reinstatement lis :
ghove and land down
Deva's Case there is Kerned workman Bense 10. As per decis : by the Hon'ble Suprer .. no scope to give relie the following Award is
gement on the che M. ROOT 、 P
...::emmating the services Steper we [. Jan 1989 is
workinan is not entitied to justified ? The er
"The action of : Manager , Ciob Sonardıh , Dist. 1. of Sint . Putul i .. get any relief.
CH . Presiding Officer [भाग ।।- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली , 3 अक्तूबर, 2008
का. आ. 2990, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में कंन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबंद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , इरनाकुलम के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 264/2006) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-10-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12012/ 289/ 1993 आई आर( बी- ( 1 ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 3rd October , 2008 S.O. 2990.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 264 2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Ernakulam , as shown in the Annexure . in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indian Bank , and their workman. which was received by the Central Government on 3-10- 2008.
[No. L- 12012/289/ 1993 - IR (B - II ) ] RAJINDER KUMAR , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT , ERNAKULAM Present : Shri . P. L. Norbert , B. A. , LL.B.. Presiding Officer
(Friday the 27th day ofJune 2008/6th Ashada 1930) J.D. No. 264/2006
(I. D. 17/1994 of Industrial Tribunal, Alapuzha ) Workman : Smt.K. R. Valsala, C/o.Sri.H.B.Shenoy , General Secretary, Cochin Labour Union , Vatsal , Krishna Swamy Road, Kochi -682035.
By Adv.Sri.H.B.Shenoy& Adv. Sri , Ashok B.Shenoy.
Management : The Zonal Manager, Indian Bank , Zonal Office , Anandhi , Chittoor Road , Pulleppady , Ernakulam , Kochi - 682 035.
By Adv . Sri . S. Easwaran .
This case coming up for hearing on 28-05-2008, this Tribunal - cum -Labour Court un 27-06-2008 passed the following.
5995
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 1 , 2008 / कार्तिक 10 , 1930
AWARD
This is a reference made under Section 10 ( 1 )( d) of Industrial Disputes Act . The reference is
"Whether the action of the management of Indian Bank , Cochin in terminating the services of Smt.K.R. Valsala , Part -time Sweeper with effect from 16-01-1993 is justified? Ifnot , what relief is the said workman is entitled to? "
2. The case was pending originally before the Industrial Tribunal , Alappuzha. That court passed an award on 17-08-1996 ordering re -instatement of the workman with backwages. This was challenged before the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala by management bank in O.P.No.21984 of 1997 , but was dismissed. The matter was taken up in W.A. No. 2450 of 2005. In appeal the award ofthe Tribunal and Judgment of the Single Bench of the High Court were set aside and the matter was remitted back to the Industrial Tribunal for a de -nova consideration on 03-07-2006 Thereafter I.D. was transferred to this Court by Industrial Tribunal . Alappuzha. Since parties were given opportunity to adduce evidence as per the judgmem in Writ Appeat the documents produced before this court were marked as Exts .X1 toX3.
3. The facts ofthe case in brief are as follows :- Smt. K. R. Valsala was engaged as Casual Part -time Sweeper whenever her mother, permanent part - time sweeper , Sint , Janaki was on leave, from 1981 onwards till the death of Smt .Janaki in 1988. After the death of Smt . Janaki she continued to work as Part - time Sweeper on casual basis . According to the worker however she was replaced by another hand on 15-01-1993 and she was retrenched without giving either notice or compensation . The retrenchment is illegal and in violation of 1.D. Act and she is entitled to be re- instated with consequential benefits of backwages, continuity of service etc.
4. According to the management Smt.K.R.Valsala was working in leave vacancies of her mother from 1981 to May 1988. Sml . Janaki died in May 1988. In accordance with the recruitment norms and guidelines the management called for a panel of candidates from employment exchange on 31-01-1989 for the purpose of selection to the post of Part- time Sweeper. However there was some delay in forwarding the panel of candidates to the management . Hence the management could select a suitable candidate only on 16-11-92 . The successful candidate . Smi.T.R.Rajamma was appointed as Part - time sweeper at Pala Branch on 15-01-1993 . During the interregnum Smt.K.R.Valsala and a few others were engaged as sweepers on causal basis intermittently . However Smt.K. R. Valsala worked only up to 21-07-1992 . Thereafter shewas not engaged even as causal labourer . She was not retrenched by the management. She was only causal worker and her engagement came to an end on 21-07-1992. Snut . Valsala was not a candidate sponsoredby employment 5996
exchange for 1 !
entitled for au
5.The
"Wheth
Before
:
claimant www .
..:
side were ma
side MWI w
Ex.MI. Me
workerwas poい
:
and they wers:.
6. The
Smt . Valsala
Ferti Smt.Janaki (w
Branch ofthe
till May 1988
work as Pa יי-ד *:.
the bank calle :
the post ofl
had not spon
candidate, Snit
on 15-01-19
been a per ...
:
is that she wa
15-01-1993
Thisis challoo
she was not others work .
also conte !
continuously
less precedin
that she had w
21-07-1992
Therefore the the worker hu to her ternsin..
:
continuous any right unids .
quarrel that th 240days is
that burden :
.... Mai calling for d
thereafter the dislodge the
::
admitted ley...
details of varie
on by the lean..
to cite therm !
( 1) M. !
:
(2)
(3) R
PART 11- SC ( ii ) ] R1,2008 / KARTIKA 10, 19.5
(4) Surendranagan Panchayat v . Jethabhai Pithamberbhu18 SC450 .
(5) ONGC Limi
Bhowmik(20337 Shyamal Chandra 7. The learned
or the management alsu submitted that continue
e of 240 days should be
en To substantiate his one preceding the te:
intention he relied on Sons of Hon'ble Supreme
District Panchayat v Court . That is, Surendra
750, R M. Yellatti v Dahyabhai Amarsinh (
Assistant Executive Engi AIR 2006 S.C. 355.
Section 25 - Fread- wwws.
"Conditions preced henchment ofworknie empang industry who has been
for Diot less than one year No workman in continuous ser
under an emple all be retrenched by that employer until-
(a) the workinan a given one month's nolice in writing indicar easons Rer retrenchiment and the period of expired , or the workman has been paid in period ofthe not ach notice, wages for the Continuous ser
is defined in Section 2.5-
He mention in Section 25-1 elevant portion reads:
"S.25-B.
( 1 )
(2) where a world pis Hot in continuous service with in the опе уеат ог ! curse ( 1 ) for a period of ghs, he shall be deemedto b in continuon e under an employer ( a) for a periodar. ifthe workman , during a period of teadar months preceding the date with wice to which calculation is to be made、 actually worked under the employer fir
days in the case of a
helow ground in a mine :
( i) one hundred workman e and
( ii) two hundesu ..
dass, buany other case;" In the wake of the put by the contesting parties that the service was cor
is aperiod of more than 240 days and vice versa cessary to determine whether the worker was in conti ruce of 2-400 days prior to her retrenchment Bul ... the date of termination is in dispute. According to tl .: User she was terminated from service on 15-01-1993 Minnes incumbent asslined charge. But according waagemet she workednever alter 21-07-1992 in any para 18. page 5 of written statement ) . It is also co the sante para that though the management had cn. panel of candidates from the employment exch... ason 31-01-1989 , the panel was received on: member 1992. Hence the ndidate could be set . : 16-11-1992 and the 5997 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 1 , 2008 /कार्तिक 10, 1930
[भाग [ [-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
her termination she had worked 240 days irrespective of the number ofdays of work every month. The number of days the claimant had worked during the period from 14-01-1992 to 15-01-1993 is as follows:-
employment hand took charge as permanent Part -Time Sweeper on 15-01-1993 . During the interregnum the management hadto engage the worker and 7 others on casual basis intermittently for sweeping work. But the worker was engaged only up to 21-07-1992.
Month
Year
Days
27
1992
January
34
February
25
March
10
April
31
May
17
June
30
July
15
August
3
September
39
October
22
November
December
27
270
Total
8. The case of the management does not appear to be correct . Ext .WI is the copy of relevant pages of the ledger concerning the S.B. Account of Smt . K. R.Valsala. Ext.W2 is copies of credit slips (X1 is the original ) . Ext . X2 is the cash book (original ) . Ext. X3 is the register ofwages paidto temporary employees . These documents belie the contention of the management . As per these books of accounts and credit slips she had worked up to the time the employment hand assumed charge on 15-01-1993 . Therefore the date of termination has to be taken as 15-01-1993 and not 21-07-1992 as submitted by the management . Therefore, for the purpose of calculation of continuous service of 240 days a period of 12 calendar months from 15-01-1993 backwards is to be taken into consideration . Hence the period ofone year so far as the worker is concerned would be between 14-01-1992 and 15-01-1993 . The learned counsel forthe management placed much reliance on the application of the worker (Ext . M 1) to argue that she herself has admitted that she has not worked during any year for 240 days . Though the worker denies the signature in the application as subscribed by her , it tallies with the admitted signatures in the claim statement and vakkalath . Ext . MI was submitted on 09-08-1990 to the Zonal Manager requesting for regularisation as Part -Time Sweeper . In the application she has mentioned that she had worked from 12-01-1981 to31-12-1985 for 146 days . Thereafter from 1986 to July 1990 she had worked 504 days . Thus altogether she had worked 650 days from 12-01-1981 to July 1990. The year bar split up is provided in the application . As per that, during no year she has worked for a period of 240 days. But Ext . M I has no relevance to the issue. The period tobe reckoned for the purpose of Section 25 - F of I. D. Act is the periodbetween 14-01-1992 and 15-01-1993 (preceding her termination ) . The learned counsel for the worker has prepared a tabular statement showing the number ofdays the claimant had worked from 09-05-1988 to 20-01-1993. The statement was prepared based on the credit entries in S.B. Account ledger (Ext . WI ) . It is not necessary to examine the credit entries in Ext . Wl and other account books prior to 14-01-1992 which is the crucial cut - off date . Therefore 1 would analyse the records with reference to the period between 14-01-1992 and 15-01-1993 . Wherever credit entries are recorded in different registers and books of accounts, respective columns are filled with " yes " and for no credit entry" nil" .
9. However, the learned counsel for the management argued that all the remittances shown in Ext . WI S.B. Account ledger ofthe worker do not take in wages alone, but personat remittances as well . It is true that in Ext. Wl ledger folio certain remittances are shown as cash payments and others as wages. But on close scrutiny it is not difficult to make out that the cash payments shown in the ledger are nothing but wages. For example in Ext .W1 on 23-05-1992 an amount of Rs.96 is seen credited to the account of the worker by cash. At that time the daily wage rate was Rs . 16. Thus the amount of Rs . 96 consists of 6 days' wages ( 16× 6 ) . Similarly on 19-6-92 there is another cash remittance of Rs . 96. On the same day there is another remittance of Rs.176 as wages . It is11 days ' wages at Rs . 16 per day ( 16 × 11 ) . On 01-07-1992 there is a remittance of Rs . 80 by way ofwages . It represents 5 days ' wages . On 22-07-1992 there is a cash remittance of Rs . 128. It is nothing but 8 days ' wages . On August 5th there is a cash remittance of Rs. 32. It is two days ' wages. The remittances are described in Ext . Wl as cash as well as wages. However, after 21-07-1992 every remittance is shown as cash remittance . But the amounts remitted clearly tally with the number of days of wages @ Rs.16 per day. The management has no case that the worker had a mini deposit account and used to remit small amounts every now and then. The worker hails from a poor family and has no pгорет education. She had no source of income other than the income from the service in the bank as casual worker . I wonder how she was able to deposit amounts within a gap of 3 or 4 days without fail . The contention of the management is amusing and is adopted to deprive a poor lady of her daily bread. The credit slips Ext . XI (copy of Ext . W2 ) shows various remittances to the S. B. Account of the worker . The credit From the records as per the above table the total number ofdays Smt . K. R. Valsala has worked , comes to 270 days within 12 calendar months preceding 15-01-1993 (between 14-01-1992 and 15-01-1993 ) . It is enough for the workerto show that during a period of 12 months preceding 5998
THE GAZETTE OF IND EMBER 1 , 2008 / KARTIΚΑ 10 ,
[PARI I SE ii Date
ch
Runarks
Amount No .::
days
Credit Slip W2
Leger Ettry W!
Register of wages of Temporary employees .
14.01.92 Y
Yes
Yes (No.
117
30.01.92
Yes
78
Yes(Racin :
The name of Valsala tempered and corrected as Kadira in X 1. :
Yes
30.01.92
-:10 .
Yes ( Radta)
156(78-78)
14.02.92 Ye
Yes
176
Yes ( Nona !
! :
Yes
29.02.92
Yes(Kadhs)
208
N and X2 difes
::
YS
11.03.92
176
Yes
Yes (Valsala)
31.03.92 Yu :
Yes
:
721
Yes Radk ...
Xand X 2 - naire dithers 13.04.92 Ye :
Yes
Yes ( Valsala:
04.05.92
Yes
142
i
Ilie nante omn Yes ( Radh ..
Xis 1umpered 23.05.92 Y۰۰۰
Yes
Yes ( Vaisu
208
23.05.92
96
Yes
Yes (Radi
2 - name JiBers Yes
ני
19.06.92 J:
adnanmedia Yes Rad
NS.
19.06.92
Yes
176
Yes (Vari
:
Yes
01.07.92
४०
Yest Valsar .
Yes
22.07 92 1
128
Yes Radh
Dscrepanes in the threes
272
!.
2207.92 1 .
Yes
Yes Ra
2208.92 Ve
Yes
150
Nil (Valsalan
29.08.92
Nil
res
110
47
101.109.97
Yes
! ..
1.10.02
Yes
Nit
Nil
07.10.92
Yes
31.10.92
Yes
Nil
07.11.93
Nil
נא
14.11.92
Yes
Nil
21.11.92 :
けれ
Nil
יים
05
2811
Yes
Yi .
32
01.12.92
Nil
1,
Yes
Nil
80
1.212.92 1.
Yes
Nil
14.12.92 1۰۰۰
96
96
Yes
Nil [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
5999
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 1 , 2008/कार्तिक 10 , 1930
The management is directed to comply with Section 25 - F ofthe I.D.Act within the shortest possible time .
The award will come into force once month after its publication in the Official Gazette.
Dictated to the Personal Assistant , transcribed and typed by her , corrected and passed by me on this the 19th day of June, 2008.
P. L. NORBERT, Presiding Officer
APPENDIX
Witness for workman
15-12-1995
WWI
Smt. K. R. Valsala .
Witness for the Management
MWI - 02-02-1996 Sri .Jose Joseph .
Exhibits for Workman
WI Photostat copy of the Saving Bank Account No.2838 maintained by Pala Branch of Indian Bank in the name of Smt . K. R. Valsala.
W2 Photostat copy of the SB Account No.2838 Credit Slips maintained by Pala Branch of Indian bank for the period from 01-05-1988 to 31-01-1993.
Exhibit for Management
slips are signed by the Manager of the bank. It was impossible foraperson ofthe background of the worker to have remitted amounts on various days within short gaps in her account. The bank was not able to show that the worker had any other source of income . Apart from that the remittances perfectly match and tally with the wage rate of the worker. Ext.X3 register ofwages of temporary employees discloses unethical method of manipulating the accounts with a view to see that the worker does not acquire any right or any kind ofbenefit. The payments made on 30-01-1992 to Valsala for 12days ofwork is changed and corrected as payments made to Radha ( said to be another casual Part-time Sweeper) . However, the credit slips of that day as well as the S.B. ledger of the worker show that those payments were made to Vaisala and not to Radha. On 29-02-1992 as per ledge folio and credit slip an amount ofRs .208 was paid as wages to Valsala . This is also shown in Ext.X2 cash book a payments made to Valsala . But in Ext.X3 it is shown as wages paid to Radha. On 04-05-1992 Rs . 192 was paid towardswages ofValsala as per Ext . WI and 2. But in Ext.X3 thisisshown as wages to Radha. In the cash book Ext.X2 an amount ofRs . 192 is seen remitted to the account of Valsala as per token No.54. However after writing the name of Valsala something is overwritten making it difficult to discern what was originally written . On 23-05-1992 Rs. 96 was remiltedto theaccount ofValsala as per Ext . WI , W2 and X2 . But in the register ofwages Ext .X3 against the remittance Radha's name is mentioned. So also in respect of the remittances made on 19-6-1992 and 26-6-1992 , the same discrepancy is seen.
10. For the sake of denying service benefits to a part- time sweeper , the officers of Pala branch have played the trickery . Theloyalty of such officers to the bank by doing jugglery in books of account brings no luster to the institution or laurels to the officials . It is no act of valour to trick and trap a poor , illiterate lady with tampered records . In the face of such records she is unable either to counter the contention of the bank or decipher the deception . It is unfair on the part of the management to have resorted to tampering with the records to achieve their goal . The records clearly indicate that the worker had been in the service of the bank for a continuous period of240 days during 12 calendar months preceding her termination on 15-01-1993 . It follows therefore that she cannot be thrown away from service bare handed . She enjoys the protection of S.25 - F of I.D. Act unmistakably . A violation of a statutory provision cannot be made good by subsequent compliance . It was mandatory to comply with the provision before she was terminated from service. However, taking into consideration the distance of time 15 years after the termination and the age factor of the worker, it may not be appropriate to order re - instatement . However the bank is bound to comply with 8.25 -F of the Act without driving her from pillar to post .
In the result , an award is passed finding that the action of the management in terminating the service of Smt . K. R. Valsala w.e. f. 16-01-1993 is illegal and unjustified.
MI 09-08-1990 Photostat copy of representation submitted by Smt . K. R.Valsala .
Court Exhibits
XI Originals of the credit slips maintained in the management bank in the name of Smt . K. R. Valsala . (Originals of Ext . W2).
X2 Rough Cash Books for the period from 21-6-88 to 11-02-1993.
X3 Register of wages paid to temporary employees from01-05-1988 to31-01-1993.
नई दिल्ली, 3 अक्तूबर , 2008
का. आ. 2991.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सिण्डीकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम ऱ्यायालय , इरनाकुलम के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 172/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-10-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-12012/79/1998- आई आर ( बो -11 ) ]
राजिन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी .
New Delhi , the 3rd October . 2008 2991...ועוד.- n pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 172/ 2006) of the Central Governmenu Industrial Tribunal - cum- 6000
THE, GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 1 , 2008 KARTIKA 10, 19
Labour Court . Ernakulam , as shown in the Annexure . in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Syndicate Bank , and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 3-10-2008.
[No. L- 12012/79/ 1998-1R13-11 ) }
RAJINDER KUMAR . Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT , ERNAKULAM Present : Shri. P. L. Norbert , B. A .. LL.B .. Presiding Officer
(Friday the 23rd day ofMay 2008/2nd Jaishta 1930 ) 1.13 . No. 172/2006 (1.D. 52/1998 of Labour Court, Ernakulam ) Union
: The Assistant Secretary. Syndicate Bank Staff Association, T.D.Road, Kochi - 682035.
By Adv. Sri , S. Nagaresh .
Management : The Divisional Manager , Syndicate Bank, Divisional Office , M.G.Road, Emakulam.
ByAdv . M. P. Ashok Kumar .
This case conning up for hearing on 16-05-2008, this Tribunal- cum - Labour Court on 23-05-2008 passed the following.
AWARD
This is a reference made under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of Industrial Disputes Act . The reference is:
"Whether the action of the management of Syndicate Bank to terminate the services of Sh . R.S.Pai. Clerk vide order dated 16-12-96 is legal and justified , and whether the management is justified in not considering the request of the Smt. Pushpa Pai . W/ o . R.S. Pai terminated employee due to medical ground for compassionate appointment ? If not, what relief theworkman is entitled to? "
2. R.Santharam Pai was a Clerk of Syndicate Bank since01-02-1978. While so, he met with a major accident on 26-08-1993 and sustained serious injuries . He was hospitalized and underwent prolonged treatment for Quadriplegia . He availed leave at his credit till 01-09-1996. Thereafter he applied for extra ordinary leave up to 1-9-1997 . The medical Board examined the workman and certified that he had cent percent disability The managementon 16-12-1996 decided to terminate the service ofthe workman after giving him 3 months ' notice . Since the representation of the workman and the onion to retain the workman in service was not favourably considered the union has raised the industrial dispute.
PARIS 3. According to the unson the ternunation of the service of the workanun's illegal and in violation of provisions of Sasthri Awind and Bipartite Settlement. The workman was discrimined in the matter of dispeщаном of his service while in sartukar instances disabled persons were allowed to remer service on humanitarian and compassionate grounds set of the management wanted to terminate the service of the workman they should have provided an employmen to his dependant on compassionate ground The management waited till the workman crossed the age of 55 years for terminating his service with a view to der : craployment to his dependants on compassionate gronal . Hence the umon prays tinat the workman may be reinstatedin service we 1. 20-03-1947 with all consequential benefits and continudy of service and arrears of wages or alternatively to give employment on compassionate ground to us dependants
4.According to the management the workrman l availed and exhausted ai ! his eligible leave at credit up to 01-09-1996. The managconent in addition had granted extra ordinary additional leave on lass dipay. The workman was absent from duty commusly from 28-08-1993 onwards Since the employee was totally disabled he was unable to discharge his duties . It became timperative for the bank to invoke para 522 ( 1 ) of Sasthri Award and terminate his service after 3 months notice . Since the workman Wis unable to discharge his dunes and was not auendung, his duties continuously from 28-08-1993 the bank was not in a position to consider his representation . Bank has non violated any ofthe provisions of Sasthri Award or partite Settlements . The disability of the workman is incomparable with the disability of other workers . The employment on compassionate ground is given to one of the dependants ofthe employee dying in harness or to a dependant of the employee opting to retire voluntarily on medical ground before attaining 55 years of age Employment on compassionate ground cannot be claimed as a mater el right. The workman was aged 57 years at the time ul termination of his service . Hence employment on compassionate ground could not be considered by the management . The bank has scrupulously followed the relevant provisions of Sasthri Award and Bipanme settlements while terminating the service ofthe workinan The bank has infact granted eligible leave and in addition extra ordinary leave on loss of pay In the circumstances the workınan is not entitled for any relief
5. In the light of the above contentions the following points arise for consideration.
1. Is the termination of service ofworkman legal " 2. Is any of the dependants of the employee eligible to get employment on compassionate ground?
3. Reliefs, if any
The evidence consis of the oral testimony of W' and documentary evidence of Exts W-t to W- 10 on the 6001 [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 1 , 2008 /कार्तिक 10 , 1930
side ofthe workman and MWI and Exts . Ml and M2 series on the side ofthe management .
6. Point No.1:-The workman Shri .R.S.Pai joined the service of the bank on 1-2-1978 as clerk . He met with an accident on 26-8-1993 and was bedridden . He applied for leave and exhausted all the leave at credit and in addition he availed additional extra ordinary leave on loss ofpayup to 1996. The Medical Board which examined the workman certified that he had cent percent disability. These facts are not disputed.
7. Ext . W4 is the order of termination dated 16-12-1996 . The workman had made representation to the management for reconsideration of the termination order and copy of re- representation is Ext . W5 . The union thereafter raised an Industrial dispute regarding the termination of service by Ext . W6 complaint to Assistant Labour Commissioner . Ext.M 1 is the medical certificate of the Medical Board certifying that the worker is suffering from quadriplegia and he has locomotor disability. Ext.M2 series are internal correspondence of the management bank regarding leave applied and sanctioned including a letter addressed to the worker. The termination of the service of the worker is challenged on the ground that it is against S.47 of( The) Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities , Protection ofRights and Full Participation) Act, 1995. S.47 reads:
Itwas held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that S.47 contains a clear direction that the employer shall not dispense with the service of an employee who acquires the disability during his service . The Hon'ble Supreme Court further observed that the Act is a social beneficial enactment dealing with disabled persons and the object of the Act is to protect the rights of a disabled employee and provide him equal opportunities and full participation . The provision should be construed with a view to advance the object of the statute . It is a special enactment and should over-ride the provisions ofa general enactment . In F.A.C.T. V.Gopinatha Panicker 2004 (2 ) KLT 455 , a Division Bench of the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala held that a reading of $.47 inakes it abundantly clear that no establishment shall dispense with or reduce in rank an employee who acquires adisability during his service .. If possible he should be shifted to another post suitable to him or keep him in a supernumerary post until he attains the age of superannuation .It is also held that the provision is mandatory in nature. In the light of S.47 ofthe Act and in view of the observations in the decisions referred supra the management could not have terminated the service of the workman . He had served the management bank 15 years beforehehad met with a major accident and was bed ridden . Hewas not in a position to move or do any work since the date of accident . The management was well aware of that . The special enactment ( Disabilities Act ) was not taken into consideration. But invoking para 522 ( 1 ) of Sasthri Award the termination was effected. Para 522( 1 ) reads :
( 1 ).No establishment shall dispense with or reduce in rank , an employee who acquires a disability during his service:
Provided that, if an employee , after acquiring disability is not suitable for the post he was holding could be shifted to some other post with the same pay scale and service benefits .
"( a) In cases not involving disciplinary action for misconduct, and subject to the provisions of paragraph 4 of Chapter XXXIV , the employment of a permanent employee may be terminated by three months' notice or on payment of three months' pay and allowances in lieu of notice .
(b ) The service of a probationer may be terminated by one month's notice or on payment of one month's pay and allowances in lieu of notice" .
Provided further that if it is not possible to adjust the employee against any post , he maybe kept on a supernumerary post until a suitable post is available or he attains the age of superannuation , whichever is earlier .
(2) No promotion shall be denied to a person merely on the ground of his disability :
9 It was argued by the learned counsel for the management that the workman has to approach first the competentauthority made mention in S.50 or 57 of (The) Persons with Disabilities ( Equal Opportunities Protection of Rights and full participation ) Act , 1995 , for any relief under the provisions of the Act and not a court of law. The submission is not appealing. There is no prohibition or exclusion ofjurisdiction of the court in the Act. Provided that the appropriate Government may, having regardto the type of work catried on in any establishment, by notification and subject to such conditions, ifany, as may be specified in such notification, exempt any establishment from the provisions of this section."
8. In Kunal Singh V. Union of India 2003 (3 ) KL T61 (SC) a Constable in the Special Service Bureau suffered an injury to his left leg and his leg was amputated. He was invalidated from service on the basis of the report ofMedical Board that he was permanently incapacitated for the service. A writ petition filed by the employee was dismissed . The matter came up in appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court .
10. For the purpose of carrying out the provisions of theAct stipulation is made for appointment of officers and committees . S.3 speaks of the constitution of a Central Co-ordination Committee by the Central Government . S.8 relates to functions ofthe Central Co - ordination Committee . li's functions are to evolve apprehensive policy for solving the problems ofdisabled persons , co - ordinate the activities of all Departments of Government as well as Non- 6002
VETE OF INDIA Governmental Opamzaisons , to develop a nation pe to advise Central ( srrament on the formulation ofpol programmes , legislation and projects etc. 5.9 spel Central Executiveromittee . Section 10 refers to ofCentral Executive Committee which has to cart decisions ofCentral Coen dination Committee . S ...
to State Co-ordinarionummittee . $ 18 relates to be ...
ofState Co-ordination Cornmittee . Its functions the same as Central to ordination Comittee . 51 of State Executive Committee and its func mentioned in 8.2050 says that'the State Ciserer shall appoint atis authority as it deems fit to be competent authority for the purpose of the Act S to appointinent of Cuel Commissioner . The ru Chief Commissione comerated in S.58 12 are to Co- ordinate the work of Commnission
utilisation of funds disbursed by the Central C
take steps to sategarnd the rights and facihts available to disabled persons and subitrit reput Central Government on the implementation of the such intervals as the Government prescribe . In $.59 empowers the inci Comu issioner to se complaints with respes to deprivation of rights !
with disabilities Section 60 refers to appo Commissioners for persons with disabilities interes by the State Government . 5.61 refers to the Powersh Commissioners . Thecemomissioner has to ordina work of departinents State Government M utilization of funds debursed by the State Li take steps to suleguard the nights and Edition available to persons with disabilities , submit t
State Government on the implementation of the A intervals as that Cowerment may prescribe and copy thereof to de Chief Commissioner By Se Commissioner is empowered to look into complaints r to deprivation of rights of persons with dischise...
says that the Chiet Commissioner and the Com of the States shall for the purpose of dischaeme :
functions under the Act have the satne powers .
vested in a court ander the Code of Civil Procedime trying a suit . The powers are.
(a) suming and enforcing the attendin witnessc
(b) requtthe discovery and producer:: document .
(c) requisition any public recesse thereof from any court or office.
(d) receiving evidence on affidavits , and (c) issuing cotumissions for the exam witnesses or documents
11. S- 59 , 2 and 63 referred above are televum purpose of this case
2008/KARTIKA 10 , 19 1 .
PART II Sec. 3 ( ) ) 12.If the rights of led persons are denied by any establishment Cimmissioner and the Commissioners in states c... connder the grievances of such disabled persons . Forsidering such applications
are conferred on the Chief certain powers of a civil co ..
by $.63 of the Act .
ommissioner and the Commr stoners
ise power of civil court are It is for the limited purpose that
does not mean that the conferred on the officers.1 14
jurisdiction of court is exed by the provisions of the Act. On the other hand it is clear from 5.72 that the Act is in
ton of any other law S-72 addition to and not in deco
reads:
"The provisions
inereunder shall be in ed .;
Ast, at the rules made and not in derogation of uny other law for the time on force or any rules , order or any instructions issued render , enacted or issued for the benefit of persons Jabulines "
Therefore this couts brisdiction to adjudicate an issue with regard to derights of a disabled person under the provisions of Ils et . S. -17 gives protection to an employee who acquireshty during his service .
Establishment is deed in S.2tke of the Act !ollows:-
" establishment " memporation established hy or under a Centralnced or Stak Act or an authority or a body or controlled on aded by the government orizi authority or a Government company as defined . Section 61 ? ot the Companies Act , 1956 and twindes Departments of t Government " ,
math of the service of the 13. At the time of
head more years In serve workman he was aged 5 ?
before superammation . As er 5.47 even it the workman was totally disabled to discurge any duty still the bank could not have terminalus service, bat should base kept him on a supernumerumul has superantuation.
Therefore the tentanation sl the service of the workmanis illegal and in violation of's of the Act .
14. Point No. 2-16 1993 when the workman mel wab the accident he was el below 55 years . He was terminated from service i March 1997. He had mad representation to the Managemem for getting employme on compassionate ground of his dependants ExtWS is a copy of the represent dated 1-2-1997 Accordine, to the workman the marcat did not consider its representation and waited uli Mach 1997 to terminate hu from service . The family ofthe woken is in difficulty due to lack of income. As per the circular of the bank dated 31-3-83 the Board of Dnectors could have given employment 10 one of the dependants of the workman yan compassionate ground on the other hand it is submuted { भागं II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
6003 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर , 2008 कार्तिक 10 , 1930
W4 16-12-96 Photostat copy of termination order.
WS 01-12-97 Photostat copy of representation submitted by workman to the management.
W6 14-03-97 Photostat copy of representation submitted by Union before the ALC (C) Kochi.
W7 05-05-97 Photostat copy of representation submittedby union before the ALC (C)Kochi,
W8 20-05-97 Photostat copy of representation submittedby Union. Jefore the ALC (C) Kochi .
20-05-97 Photostat copy of minutes of discussion he'l before the ALC W9 (C) Kochi .
by the learned counsel for the management that the workman is not eligible for employment on compassionate ground because the dependent wife of the workman has crossed the age of superannuation now. The scheme formulated for compassionate employment envisages providing a job to one of the dependants of the employee who dies in harness and also to the dependants of an employee orting to retire voluntary on medical grounds before attaining the age of 55 years . In the case of workman none of these factors are present to make a claim for employment on compassionate ground. Moreover he had crossed the age of55 years at the time of termination of his service making him ineligible for compassionate einployment . Moreover at is not a part of service conditions of an employee and cannot be claimed as of right . The union fairly concedes that the workman does not fall under any of the categories made mention in the scheme of the bank for employment on compassionate ground Hence I find that the workman is not eligible for claiming employment on compassionate ground.
Photostat copy of circular No.87/83 / BC/ PER/22/HRDD of the Syndicate W- 10-31-03-83 Bank.
Exhibits for the Management
MI 15-05-96 Photostal copy of medical certificate.
M2 series 5 Nos .
15. Point No. 3 :- Since the termination of the service of the workman is illegal as it is in violation of $.47 of the Acthe is entitled to be treated as continuing in service till the date of superannuation . He is also eligible for all service benefits including continuity of service , arrears of wages etc. from the date he was terminated from service i.e .. from 20-03-1997 till superannuation.
Leave application submitted by workman and orders passed by management on leave applications.
नई दिल्ली , 6 अक्तूबर , 2008 In the result an award is passed finding that the action of the management in terminating the service of Sri R.S. Pai by order dated 16-12-1996 w.e.l. 20-03-1997 is illegal and unjustified . He is entitled to be treated as an employee in service as envisaged in S.47 of Act of 1995 till the date of superannuation with all consequential benefits like back wages , continuity of service ete . However his wife is not entitled for employment on compassionate ground.
का. आ. 2992, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में कंन्द्रीय सरकार जवाहर नवोदय विद्यालय के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण न.1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 115/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-10-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ १ ।
The award will come into force one month after its publication in the Official Gazette .
[सं. एल-420/ 2/279/2002- आई आर ( सीएम -11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी Dictatedto the Personal Assistant , transcribed and typed by her, corrected and passed by me on this the 23rd day ofMay, 2008.
New Delhi , the 6th October , 2008 P. L. NORBERT, Presiding Officer
Appendix Exhibits for the Union
WI Photostat copy of Medical re- imbursement claim of Sri . R. Samharain Pai .
W2
S.O. 2992.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Govemment hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 115/2003 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , No 1. Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya , and their workman, which was received by the Central Governmnent on 6-10-2008 03-10-1996 Sanction order issued by Syndicate Bank in respect of the medical reimbursement claim of Sri.R. Santharam Pai
No. 1-42012279: 2002- IR( CM -II ) ]
AJAY KUMAR GAUR. Desk Officer W3 01-09-1996 Photostar copy , of leave application submittedby workinan .
6004
AZDOOFING 1.2008 KARTIKA 10, 1930
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHIOCYA VENDRA KUMAR SHARONA PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL COVERNME INDUSTRIAL
Case No. ID115
Sh . Rajbir. Se
R/ o Village & F
The Charkhi Dod
The Principal.
Devrala . Disn
ARANCE
For the work
For the mana יוצ :
08-08-20 Central Gent de Notificamon No 279/ 2002- IR
following disputesuis ribunai 150 sa
"Whether the muse
Navodaya Vidthaisanietemezung
of Sh . Rajbir So Samar Singh. Electrician- cum - ifcip we.f. 21-8-2001 jest and legal ? If not, to what rein workınan is entuled ..
2. The preset etence was made is the a Government on the time of conciliation proceedings adjudication ottimater referred in the schedule reisire !
above and the work man prayed for declaring the hon the management as liegeland invalid and for rein in service with ful : isa kanges and ail consequenti Is in the interest fiestar , esanits and hair plas.
The named up a יהוי application.
As per offi meranchem dared
was fixed in pre - seungon 22-8-1-8 ter
a and concristion ne by adopting the
With the eſlur'smal , the sarma withdraw his tres Pork the represa management Sl Pastasia K pracipalarda made a staremerns agreed between the pretres workman will works daily wages as seturfy that the per D.C. rates atot noummal charges will be ded account of foodinding and workman all wildra .
his reference . It propose to dispose out this returenes Lok Adalat . Accgl the reference is returned t Central Govt . as stief in Lok Adalat Centr
be informed. l'ile signed to record
Chandigarh 22-8-08
[PART5 नई दिल्ली अक्टूबर, 2008
का. आ. 2993. औद्यागिक निनाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 की 14 ) की धारा के अनुसरण में कंन्द्रीय मरकार उत्ता रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियऔर उनके कर्मकारों के बीच. अनुबन्ध में निर्वादार औद्योगिक न्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , कानपुर के पंचार : 1997 ) को प्रन्क शिन "ती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार की 2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था .
[सं. एल 1300-1096- आई आर( ची -[ ) | अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी
October , 2008 New Delhi , the
S.O. 2993. In purs dustrial Disputes Act sree of Section 17 of the Leveritient hereby publish 1997 of the Central Govent focusmial Tribunal -cum- of 1947 ) . the Central the award ( Ref. No 133 Isbotn Court . Kanpur as .. the Annexure , in the lustrial Dispute betwear the management of Friar Railway , and their work with was received by the ( mrai Government on 06 1
1012130 1996-1R(13-10 WAY KUMAR , Desk Unice !
ANNEMUR
BEFORE SHRIR.G SHUKLA PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT'INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURE SHRAM BHAWAN ATI CAMPUS Udyog Nagar . Kanpur. ID No 13,397
Sri Shyam Lal son of D. K. I
Co India Railway Employers beceration
-46 B. G. T. Road Railwayters . Opposite Ganges Floor Mpur
Divisional Superintending incer. Disional Railway Mana rthern Railway, Allaiad AWARD
1. Central Governa ent . Mimstry of labour vide Notification No. L-41012.130 -ER13-1 ) dated 20-07-97. has referred the following pures for adjudication to this Tribunal---
Kya Mandal Adhikatas Abuyantac Etter Railway Allahabad dwara Sri Saral Ciangman ko Damank 9-11-95 se sewa se mukt karna Nyayochus Hai ? Yasdınabito sambandhit Karmkar kis Vautosh ka haqdar har 2. The case of then is that he was working under PW ] ( 1 ) Northern Rws, Kanpur , and was absorbed s the post of Gangınar in the opposite party. The enposite party issued a cha sheet dated 17-11-19941 6005 भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 1 , 2008 कार्तिक 10 , 1930
[ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3( ii) ]
2. The claim of the workman has been vehemently disputed by the opposite party on the ground that the reference is ambiguous and misconceived too and is liable to be returned ; the disputant parties as given in the reference order, are Shyam Lal son of D. K. Jha and the Railway Administration respecting one Shyam Lal Gangman; said Shyam Lal son of D. K. Jha has no authority to espouse or prosecute or conduct the case as he is neither a registered Trade Union nor has any authority to espouse the claim nor any individual can raise a dispute under section 10( 1 ) ofthe I.D.Act . The reference has been visibly procured on false misrepresentation and is not legally sustainable reference. Even otherwise no Shyam Lal son of any D. K. Jha has ever remained as a gangman under opposite party therefore question of his alleged removal or discharge and or retrenchiment never arises and at any rate the reference is in respecting a non entity and espoused by an entity devoid of any locus standi and is liable to be replied accordingly and lastly it is pleaded that in all events the claim statement on record is a nullity in law and on facts and is worth no consideration therefore reference is also liable to be returned with a no claim award.
3. On behalf of the workman Sri D. K. Jha has filed rejoinder statement in which nothing new has been pleaded except reiteration of the facts already pleaded in the statement of claim.
4. In the present case on behalf of the workman his wife Smt Sushila Devi examined her self as worker witness in support of the claim of the workman . Witness on oath has stated before the tribunal that during the pendency of the case her husband Shyam Lal expired in the year 1998 and that, the original documents connected with the case has been filed in the case . She goes on to state that her husband was working as Gangman under P.W.I and that her husband was removed from service in the year 1995.
5. As is evident from the order sheet the manage- ment was debarred from evidence on 13-08-04 as they failed to adduce any evidence despite availing of a number of opportunities . Thus virtually there is no evidence worth the name in support of their case. Even management also failed to cross examine the workers evidence . Workers evi- dencehas proved the documents which have been marked asExhibit W-1 to Exhibit W- 16.
6. I have heard the arguments of the parties at length and have also gone carefully with the records of the case.
7. Ext. W - 1 is the postal receipt of the telegram dated 16-04-94 , Ext. W-2 is the certificate of Doctor Rajendra Prasad in which it has been certified that Smt. Sushila Devi wife of Sri Shyam Lal remained under his treatment from 13th March , 94 to 20th June 1994. Ext - W.3 is yet another certificate of the same doctor certifying that the Smt . Shushila Devi wife of Shyam Lal was under her treatment rill 22-9-94 , Ext . W-4 is copy of minor punishment order the workman on the allegations that the workman remained on unauthorized absence from duty from 13-03-94 to 22-09-94 . Apart from the above it was also mentioned in the charge sheet that the workman also remained on unauthorized absence from duty for 12 days in the year 1989 , for 20 days in the year1993 and for 25 days in the month ofJune 1995. The workman replied the charges where after disciplinary action under rules were initiated against the workman by the opposite party in which the Assistanı Engineer Northern Railway, Fatehpur , was nominated as enquiry officer. It is also pleaded by the workman thai before initiation of inquiry the workman vide his letter dated 12-04-95made a request before the enquiry officer to provide him copies of documents listed in the charge sheet for making his effective defence, and without providing the same opposite party started departmental inquiry against the workman . It is the further case of the workman that after getting leave sanctioned for the period 2-4-94 to 12-4-94 the workman had gone to his viltage and due to illness ofher wife he could not report for his duty, after expiry of sanctioned teave and he informed about it by sending a telegram to the opposite party with request to extend leave for 20 days and the period of absence mentioned in the charge sheet is incorrect. It is alleged that the workman remained on Flurt on Duty for the period 16-2-94 10 21-3-94 and, also remained on sanctioned leave for the period 2-4-94 to 12-4-94. It has also been pleaded by the workman that he actually remained, absent from his duty from 13-4-94, the reason for which was the illness of her wife and the workman remained busy in her treatment . It has been further pleaded that prior to the present charge sheet the opposite party issued him charge sheet in which charges for his alleged absence in the year 1989, 1993 and 1994 have been settled by the opposite party which is evident from order dated 11-11-94. The workman was issued show cause notice dated 11-8-95 in which it the workman was directed to reply the same within a period of 15 days . Although it was mentioned in the alleged show cause notice that a copy of inquiry report is enclosed with the same but in fact no such copy was ever provided to the workman in respect of which the applicant requested in writing on 1-9-95 and in this way in the absence of the copy of inquiry report , the workman remained handicapped to reply the show cause notice effectively in his defence and ultimately the disciplinary authority without providing him opportunity of his defence passed final orders dated 9-11-95 whereby the services of the workman were removed by the opposite, party. The punishment orders dated 9-11-95 is illegal and void in the eye oflaw and has been passed without proper application ofmindbythe disciplinary authority. The workman preferred an appeal against the final order before the appellate authority on 22-12-95 , which has not been decided till date. On the basis of above it has been prayed that the punishment order dated 9-11-95 being illegal and invalid be set aside and the workman be reinstated in the service of the opposite party with full back wages continuity of service and all consequential benefits .
6006
THE GAZETTE OF INL
MBER 1, 2008 /KARTIKA 10 .
PART --Si
neither provided winijuments mentioned in the dated 11-11-9-4 W - 5 is the copy of charge
17-11-94, Ει Witletter dated 12-4-95 ef de notran charge sheet nor the ... had been provided with the addressed to the inquiry officer dema
copy of inquiry rep in the opposite party which documents in Jis dence Ext . W - 7 and W - 8
according to the settis pieof law have caused seETIOUS of postal receipts . Ext . W9 is the cop
prejudice to the wur making etlective defence proceedings dated 05, Ext. W- 10 is cop
against the charges and under the facts and proceedings in which : statement of workman
circumstances the arti of the vontir opinion thi by the inquiryllisen and cross examination...:
for the reasons disea e. having regard to the witness Sri SMA Siddiqui were recorded
uncontroverted evide... werkers side, the aches o إ
i
witness has admitted the fact that the work
the management can!. beld to be justified and legai onHurt on [Duty during the period 24-2-941
and thus is in breach tled provisions of law that goes on to admit the fact thatthe workmer
NO ONE SHOULD HI DEMNED UNHEARD T sanctioned leave for the period 2.1.94
from the above it is ses that the worknor h Prosecution witness during the course oli
not been providedwar. We opportunity of his detence categorically admitted the fact that period oth
as required by the pr Batural justice and rules regularized
governing the ser !. sans of the workman As imposing punishment of W. [LT for one
discussed above it is. ... that the action of the Assistant Engineer. Fatehpur . Prosecution m
opposite party is of principles of natural expressed his ignorance about receipt ofan
justice and rules pov the service conditions .
the workman Jequesting twenty days leave
sanctioned leaves but the fact that the work
9 Before su the case it may be pointed
out that it has come in vidence where the wite of sent a telegrain extending leave for twond
established trum Ishibit Wal which is a
the workman has evar at dros W.W.1 in support of
the claim of her hus that her husband during receipt oftelegram issued in the inomh of Ap
the course of penden . plescht case expired in the specific question posed to him by the manSOM
year 1998 , therefur:: tremstatenient in the prosecution witness has adinitted that the
instant case is not p
absence from 13-1-94 stands regularized
awarding punishuren of WIT for one yest
10. Having conc ture action of the opposite workman vide order ated 11-11-94 and lisas
party in removing from the service of the admitted that the period of absence stands
railway with effect : nesther just for legalit HOD from 16-23-9410 21-3-94 . Period ofabsen
held that the workour b.entled for enaire bank to12-4-94 as LAP an ! period 13-4-94 0 10
wages tilt the date . death together with othe as absent , Ext . W - J is the copy of show ::.
consequential bented with the post on the Ext.W- 13 is the cops ed letter dated 1-9.05
premises as if the woever been renped lion addressed to the Divisional Railway Marts.
the service of the up:.. Patal , any point 11:16 demanding py inquiry report un tse
Consequently the work! he'd entitled for his fiulitsach although nis mentated in the show ca
wages, continuity of s end all consequential benefits copyof inquins test enclosed with it :
attached with the post
is found enclosed with the show cause notice.
final order dued - 95 by means of which
din above terms
11. Reference !
was imposed panushment of removal from srail
SUKIA, Presiding and lastly Est . W the cope of appenpa
workman hetore the appellate authority
न " או
Ext. W- 16 is tire ces of postal receipt of res
का, आ. 2994.
8. As again the opposite par
नगिक विवाद अधिनियम , १ ९५ photocopies of certain documents in suppar !.
अनुसराय में कंन्द्रीय सरकार (1947 का 14 ) की धारा
but according to the settled provisions ! Les
बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्धकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच of documents is not admissible peace of ex
अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्यान्विाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक proved betime a court of law . Therefore , as isevi.in.t
अधिकरणः श्रम न्यायालय 2. चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं.
the managemen has been debarred from the
597/2KS ) को प्रकाशित करनी है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार की photocopies of desconnents filed by them cannot c
their case for any purpose and is of no help to ter the 06-10-2008 को प्राप्त हुः। थः ।
evidence of UND Side remains um
therefore 1liere is reason to disbelieve
[सं. एल 12168/2000 आई आरची- behalf of the workin by means of which the creati
राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकार worker stands prosed to the effect that the work [ भाग .11- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
=
NewDelhi , the 6th October, 2008
S.O. 2994. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 597: 2KS) of the Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal - curn- Labour Court , No. 2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of UCO Bank and their workman , received by the Central Government on06-10-2008 .
[No. L- 12012/ 168/2000- IR(B- 11 ) |
RAJINDER KUMAR , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-COM- LABOUR COURT- 11 , SECTOR 18- A , CHANDIGARH PresidingOfficer : Shri Kuldip Singh
Case L.D. No 597 /2KS
Registered on : 23-8-2005
DateofDecision : 2-9-2008
Shri R.N. Chopra S/ o Inderjeet Chopra Rio 234 Dada Colony Industrial Area, Jalandhar City, Jalandhar .
..Petitioner
Versus
UCO Bank, Zonal Manager, Zonal Officer , Chandigarh.
6007
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 1. 2008 कार्तिक ( 0 , 1930
10 be fair, therefore , before proceeding further in the matter arguments on the fairness of the domestic enquiry be heard. In these circumstances the parties have argued on the fairness of the enquiry.
Briefly stated the claim of the workman is that he was posted as clerk in Gurmandi , Jalandar branch of the management Bank when he was served with a charge sheet . Before he could reply to the chargesheet the management intitiated the enquiry proceedings against him by violating principles of natural justice , equity and fair play. The enquiry was also conducted with malafide intentions so as to dismiss the workman from service . The enquiry officer did not consider the statement of the defendant. Had anything happened within the premises of the Gurmandi Branch of the Bank, the management would have lodged the FIR. bul nothing such was done . The order dismissing the workman from service is wrong , unjustified and illegal . The order of appellate authority is also wrong and unjustified. Even otherwise the punishment awarded is disproportionate to the charges leveled against the workman . The workman has prayed for his reinstatement in service with full back wages and benefit of continuity of service.
...Respondent
APPEARANCES
For the workman : Mr. O.P. Batra, Advocate , For the management : Mr.N.K. Zakhmi , Advocate
AWARD
Vide their order No. L- 12012/ 168 /2000 - IR( B - II ) dated 16th of Feb , 2001 the Ministry of Labour government of India referred the following dispute for the adjudication of thisTribunal :
"Whether the action ofthe Asstt . General Manager, UCO bank in terminating the services of Shri R.N. Chopra s /o Shri Inderjit Chopra is legal and just ? If not, what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date?
The reference was entered in the concernd register and notices were issued to the parties who appeared through their counsel . They filed their respective claims in the shape of statement of cliam , written statement . replication and supported the same with the affidavit of the workman and of Shri Harwait Singh Saini , Asstt . General Manager of the Management . The Management placed on record the enquiry proceeding file and submitted that since the action against the workman was taken after holding domestic enquiry and which the workman has claimed not The claim of the workınan has been opposed by the Management .It stated by them that the reference is not maintainable , that the petitioner while posted in Gurmandi branch of the management bank committed serious acis of misconduct on 12th of Dec , 1998 for which he was charge shected . The petitioner took a number of opportunities 10 reply the charge sheet but did not file and tried to delay the matter. Sensing the intentions of the workman, the management initiated enquiry against him . During the enquiry proceedings the workman was given full opportunity to defend him . After due consideration of the enquiry report the disciplinary authority again issued notice to the workthan to show cause why the punishment of dismissal from service be not imposed on him . The petitioner replied the notice and also availed the opportunity of personal hearing. The disciplinary authority went through the enquiry report , the reply to notice given by theworkman and the record of the enquiry file. After dispassionate consideration of the matter the disciplinary authority found the charges leveled against the workman proved and imposed the punishment of dismissal from service on the workman. The workman went in appeal . The appellate authority though did not disturb the enquiry findings , yet took a lenient view of the matter and converted the penalty of dismissat from service to that of removal from service with terminal benefits ,
The workman filed replication , reiterated the facts srated in the claim petition and denied the claim made by the management in the written , statement . He however. admitted that he had filed a complaint about the alleged occurrence hetore Judicial Magistrate and the same was dismissed . Thus , lie has admitted the occurrence and the dismissal of the complaint. His plea that no occurrence had taken place otherwise the management would have lodged the FIR , goes away.
6008
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 1. 2008 /KARTIKA 10, 19
From the pleadings of the parties it is clear that the services ofthe workman were dispensed with after holding adomestic enquiry . Domestic Enquiry in industrial cases has acquired great significance and industrial adjudicanon attaches considerable importance to such an enquiry . Accordingto the Hon'ble Supreme Court an enquiry is not an empty formality but an essential condition to the legality ofthe disciplinary order . In other words , before the delinquent workman can be dismissed for misconduct , the employer should bold a fair and regular enquiry into the-misconduct and dismissal without holding a regular enquiry would be illegality .It is also well settled that the disciplinary enquiry has to be quasi -judicial , should be held according to the principles of natural justice and the enquiry officer has a duty to act judicially . The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case C'entral Bank of India Ltd versus Karunamony Banerjee , reported as ( 1967 ) 2LLJ 739. Ikas laiddown the law that the rules of natural justice require that the workman proceeded agamst should be informed clearly ofthe charges leveled against him ; witnesses should be normally examined in his presence in respect of the charges; if statements taken previously and given by the witnesses are rebed on , they should be made available 10 the workman concerned: the workman should be given a fair opportunity to exomine witnesses , including hunself. in support of his defence ; and the inquiry officer shouki record his findings based on the evidence so addused Karnaika High Cogart in the case of GR Venkatesh Reddy versus Karnataka State Road Corporation reported as ( 1995 ) 11.10 1013. bas laid downl following requirementsments of reasonable moceding subject to any special provisions relating to procedure in the relevant rules , regulations , Standing Orders or a shang (a) the employee shall be informed of the vi charges which he is called upon to meet;
(b ) he should be given an opportunity to explain a material relied on by the management to p the charges.
(c) the evulerne of the management witnesses shouk be recorded in the presence of the delinqu employee and he should be given an opportunity to cross exame such witnesses ,
(d) the delinquent employee shall either be furnished with copies of the documents relied on by the management or he pertutted to have adequate inspection of the duguments rehed on by the management;
(e) the delinquent employee should he given the oppurtunity to produce relevant evidence- both documentary and oral which include the right 10
( PAR) Sic. 3 ( ii ) ] examine self and war witnesses : and to call for relevant and matumizi documents in the custody of the employer ;
( 1) Whenever the Furity is different fram disciplinary at shall be furnish delinquent employee copy of the inquiry rep and be permitted to make a presentation to the disciplinary against the findings recorded in this geport .
be seen whether in this In this background
case the management host fait and proper enquiry against the workman or his fairness , the counsel for the workntan admitted iite a proper enquiry was held in the case. He failutut any laxity committed by the Enquiry Officer whionducting the enquiry . He , however, submitted that in misconduct alleged against the workman was his son act and taking that aspect into consideration the pot awarded is very harsh.
He has placed on record of the award passed by CGIT- cum -Labour Conandigarh in the case of V.K.Handa , who was a proceeded against for the misconducthe committed am with the present petitioner in the same occurrence dured for taking a lement view in the matter . He har stigd that the workman ו now dead and that is fot taking
JEST
Compassionate view in 11:
I have considere Mese tapeets and have also gone through the file ca
of the case I arm of the After examining
held a fur and prope opinion thu the manager
wkman was given full enquiry in the matter
opportunity to defend . The misconduct alleged and proved against hin really serious one and the punishment award is not only proper but lenment and considerate . As proved . the conduct of the workman was that ofa madman . He got odsusahed but also threatened and physically manhantled senior officials of the management in the full viess of employees of the branch the martagement bank . The wakence produced in the case show that the workman could not prove that he had ans reasons to insult Shri K. Klanna . Senior Manager and Shri J.B. Bansal , Assistant stanager . He has also atiled to show as to why the witnes made statements !
him . I do not find any reasons to disuch the punishtzient ansarded to the workman . ble Supreme Court of Prod ...
in the case of MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA L.1 [ .
VERSUS N. B. NARAVADE E FC . reported as OOSTER 360 , has enumerated cumstances in which the Industrial Tribunal canine with the фиани punishment awarded by dgement . Thear Lords has said that "Discretionlable only nil chistelead 6009 [भाग ।।- खण्ड 3 (it) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर , 2008 कार्तिक 10 , 1930
Industrial Dispute between the management of Syndicate Bank and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 6-10-2008.
[No. L- 12011 /80/2003 - IR(B- II )]
RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT- II, SECTOR 18A, CHANDIGARH
Presiding Offcier : Shri Kuldip Singh
Case 1. D. No. 1054/2005
Registered on:20-9-2005
Date ofDecision : 17-9-2008
The State Secretary , Syndicate Bank Employees Union , C/o Syndicate Bank, Faridabad - 121001
certain factors like punishment being disproportionate to gravity of misconduct so as to disturb conscience of the Courtor existence of any mitigating circumstances " . In that case the workman was found guilty in the enquiry of having used abusive and filthy language against the superior without provocation. The Labour Court found the punishment ofdismissal from service as harsh and improper and substituted with reinstatement , continuity of service and 2/3rd back wages . The Supreme Court held the order of the Labour Court and that of the High Court upholding the order of the Labour Court unjustified and held that the punishment awarded was well justified and did not need interference with regard to quantum in the circumstances of the case. A similar view was taken by the Apex Court in the case of U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Versus Subhash Chandra Sharma and Ors reported as 2000 Factories Journal Reports Vol . 96 page 441 and in the case of L.K. Verma Versus H.M.T Ltd. & Ors. , reported as 2006( 1 ) Service Cases Today 601. They held that verbal abuses are sufficient for inflict a punishment of dismissal .
Petitioner
Versus
TheAssistant General Manager, Syndicate Bank , Sarojini House, 6 Bhagwan Dass Road, New Delhi - 110001
...Respondent
APPEARANCES
For the Workтал : Mr. Dharam Singh A. R.
Mr. Gopal Mahajan , Advocate
For the Management
Deterrent punishment is must to maintain discipline at the workplaces . In the present case the misconouct was committed in a financial institution where the people pose confidence and expect orderly working therein. The conduct of the workman must have shocked the conscious of all those present and in the circumstances the punishment awarded was well justified . In the circumstances the workman is not entitled to any relief. The reference answered against him and the award is passed. Let a copy of it be sent to the appropriate Government for necessary action and the file be consigned to records after due completion.
AWARD
KULDIP SINGH , PresidingOfficer
नई दिल्ली, 6 अक्तूबर , 2008
का. आ. 2995.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सिण्डीकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 1054/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-10-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[ सं. एल-12011 /80/2003- आई आर ( बी-11 ) ]
At the request of representative of the workman, who claims himself to be the Chairman of Syndicate Bank Employees' Union , Chandigarh , the Union which has espoused the cause of the workman , the file has been summoned from records . It is stated by him that the managment has agreed to resolve the dispute between the parties favourably, therefore , the workman has authorized the union to withdraw from the contest of the present dispute . The statement of Shri Dharam Singh has been recorded and he has admitted the contents of letter. In the circumstances I do not feel it necessary to call the management and propose to answer the reference in their absence.
राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 6th October , 2008
TheGovernment of India, Ministry ofLabour vide their letter No. L12011/80/2003 - IR( B - 11 ), dated 11th ofSeptember, 2003 referred the following dispute for the adjudication of this Tribunal:
5.0. 2995. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 1054/2005) ofthe Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , No. 2 Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the
"Whether the action ofthe management of Syndicate Bank represented through the General Manager. New Delhi by imposing the punishment of stoppage 6010
14AZEIL OF INDAKARTIKA 10.1
of one increment with cumulative etles!
withholding wages for the suspension paik.i Sh . N.A Solerk Stinagar Branch of S Bank was ja and legal ? If not, whar rehe workinan and from whtel : dat The notice of the erence was given to the par the managerment appened through counsel . The workout Filed his statement of lam to which the management written statement The parties placed on recordthe effic
brough representative she The workman appeared of their witnesse orkman appeared i whereas the management examined their witnes cross- examined by the workman . The parties i placed on recorda her of documems .
now fised for argomersson 15th of October , 2008 the workman luas for dismissing the tele! < : withdrawn.
The armware sceraugo is the best settle is no doubt about when the wrkme his satisfaction abera de Jaticipated settleme dispute, there is no point to go into the merits of the corre and reply the reference . laking into account the pri the workman made through his union . The reference 1 disposed of as withdrawn and the award is passed holding that the workman is not entitled to any rehet front this Tribunal . Let the copy of the award be sent to the appropriate Government for necessary action and the flie be consigned to record after due completion
KULDIP SING ] 1 . Presiding Office : नई निरन्ती ( अक्तूबर , 2018
का, आ. 2996 , औद्योगिक विवाद अभिगम 10- ( 1947 का 14 ) की धार । के अनुसरण में कंन्द्रीय सरकार द मेन्टेनेन्स सेन्टर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियाजकों और उन्क क्रमा के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में कन्द्रीय म औद्योगिक अधिकरणः श्रभयायालय न. 2 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट संभ सं. 103/2005 ) को प्रकाशिन करती है. जो कंन्द्रीय सरकारको 6-10-2008 को प्राप्न ।
[सं. एल 42101.14.3.2004 आईआरसीएम अजय कुमार गौड़, इंम्क अधिकान New Delhi , the oth October , 2008
S.O. 2996. It pursuance of Section 17 of 11: Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 19471. the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Res . No lis 2005) ofthe Central Gost . Industrial Tribunal - cum - tabs Court No. 2, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Doordarshan Maintenane Centre , and their workmen . which was received by the Central Government on 6-10-2008.
[No. L -42012/143-2004 - IR( CM - 11 AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer
ANN
CENTRAL GOVERNME
GASTROAL TRIBUNAM. CUM- LABOURCO SOCTOR- 18A.
CHANGE Akit.
Presiding Officer : Shri S
Case ID No. 103/2005
Registered on 19-7-2005
Date of Decision : 17-9-2
Kamal Kiahoew Stp Shr:
Dhawan . B. A. LL.B. Leg 小 J. Siiri Subh AR
Colony, No. 1. Sujanpur . 1 .
...Pealama The Incharge St , Gover Mzimenance Centre . Pad:
....Respondent APPEARANCES
For the worknan : Mr. Subst : Dhawan . Advocate .
For the management : Mr.fradent Szagh Sidu , Advocate
AWARD
direction of the Tribunal S. SK Puri , employee of the management appeared akong den 15thot Outobe , 2007, 30th April , 2008 al is present even today , but meither the workman nor his casel appeared on these dates to examine the witness presem along with record 11 is in these circumstancesce under registered cover dated 3rd of May, 2008. 11 notice sent has not been rom his conductit is clear scismore interested to The workman is not present . He was not present on 30th of April , 2008 and not est en previous dates. He last attended this Tribunal on [ Sil, July 2008 and requested for summoning the record the managernem. On the was issuedto the workmar de postal receipt No 5771 received hack unserved me workman has appeared prosecute his claim In the teamstances the witness summoned is discharged .
The Government ofMad . Munistrs et labesur vehe their order No. L -4201214324-11 ) , dated 29tho ! June, 2005 referred the tolewa dispute for the adjudication of this Tribunal
"Whether the action of the management of Doordarshan Maintenance Centre represented through Incharge St: tievt of India. Doordarshan [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
Maintenance Centre , Pathankot in terminating the services of Sh . Kamal Kishore , Water Boy w.e.f. February, 2001 is legal andjustified? If not , to what reliefhe is entitled to and from which date? " The notice of the reference was given to the parties who appeared through their counsel . The workman filed his claim petition and the management filed reply thereto. The workman filed the replication and his affidavit. The management filed the affidavit of Shri Shashi Kant Purí , their Assistant Engineer and also placed on record copies of a number ofdocuments . As stated earlier , on the request of the workman the record as detailed in the application was also summoned , but the workman has failed to examine that record and to appear in the case.
The Claim of the workman is that he was appointed as Water Boyby the management w.e.f. Ist of April , 1996 and his services were terminated in February , 2001 without giving him notice or notice pay and retrenchment compensation , thus his termination from service is illegal . 11 is further his case that after the termination ofhis services, The management engaged Messrs . Shakunta Devi and other fresh hands ignoring the claim of the workman . The management has denied the claim of the workman , It is stated by them that the workman does not fall under the category of a workman since he had not served the management for 240 days , that the workman was engaged on contract and was paid accordingly. On the completion of job awarded his services were discontinued . The management has denied that the workman was getting rupees 1728/ -P.M in February , 2001 when the work allotted to him had come to an end . They have further denied that after the disengagement of the workman any other person was engaged The workman appeared as witness and proved his affidavit WWI and also relied upon annexure 20 , muster rolls for June , 1999 mark- A and B. He claimed that he had worked froin January to September, 1999 for the days as shown in the statements annexed with the written statement. He denied to have worked part time in the months of June , November and December , 2000 on a monthly rate of rupees 1000/- and claimed that he had worked for whole of the months . He admitted that he was getting salary@ 1000/-and 1200/ - P.M but claimed to have worked whole of the day . He admitted the contents of statements exhibits M - 1 to M 26 except M- 19 and stated that it is wrong that he was not getting salary @ 1728/-in February, 2001. Ile denied that his services were terminated on the expiry of period of contract in February, 2001.
It ison record that the workman admitted the contents of documents exhibits M- 1 to M-26 except M-19 . These
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 1, 2008/कार्तिक 10, 1930
6011 very documents clinch the matter in dispute . All these documents read that the engagement of the workman was aspart time contract labour and he was paid on daily wages which varied from time to time . The hours ofworking also were different . Sorne times he was paid @ 52/ - per day and sometimes@ 72/- rupees per day . His hours of working also varied from three to four hours a day . The workman has not placed on record any document nor has produced any witness to show that he had been appointed in the service of management on regular or temporary . The evidence available on record rather shows that the engagement of the workman was on contract . Having been engaged on contract he was not entitled to any notice or notice pay or retrenchment compensation . There is , therefore, no ground to claim that the management violated the provisions of Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 by disengaging him . He is therefore , entitled to no relief. The reference is answered against him and the award is passed. Let the copy of the award be sent to the Appropriate Government for necessary action and the fite be consigned to records after due completion.
KULDIP SINGH, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली , 8 अक्तूबर , 2008
का. आ. 2997.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार डब्ल्यू. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के श्रीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय , नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 24/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-10-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-22012/327/2005- आई आर ( सीएम -1 [ ) ]
अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 8th October , 2008
S.O. 2997.--In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 24/2007 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Western Coalfields Limited, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 8-10-2008.
[No. L-22012/327/2005 -IR(CM - IT ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer 6012
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 1 , 2008 /KARTIKA 10 , 1930
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRIAN.YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM - LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR Case No.CGIT/ NGP/24/07
[PART 11 SEC. 3 (ii ) ]
Date: 29-9-2008
Petitioner/ : The President ,
PartyNo. I Koyla Shramik Sabha, Coal Estate, Civil Lines , Nagpur on behalf of Shri Sarju Prasad & Shri Ramdas Suryawanslai .
Versus
Respondent : PartyNo.2
The Sub -Area Manager , Western Coalfields Limited, Makardhokda Sub - area, Tah . Umrer, Nagpur
AWARD (Dated 29th September, 2008 )
1. The Central Government after satisfying the existence of dispute between The President, Koyla Shratnik Sabha, Coal Estate. Civil Lines . Nagpur on behalf shri Sarju Prasad & Ramdas Suryawanshi , ( Party No. hand the Sub -Area Manager , Western Coalfields Liznited. Makardhokda Sub - area, Tah . Umrer , Nagpur ( Party No 20 referred the same for adjudication to this Tribunal vale its letter No. L-22012-327-2005-1R ( CM- 11 ) dated 12-6-2007 under clause ( d ) of sub - Section ( 1 ) and sub - Section 12A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Acı , 1947 [ 141947 with the following schedule.
2. "Whether the action of the management of Western Coalfields Limited , Makardhokda Sub - area is legal and justified in denying promotion to the workanan Shri Sarju Prasad & Shri Ramdas Suryawanshi to the post of F-P Fitter (Excv. Gr . C we.f. 5-12-2003 ? If not , to what reliet are the workmen entitled ? "
3. The case came up for hearing on 2-4-9-2008 OF which the case was fixed for filing the statement of claim by the workman Nobody appeared and both were absent when called . On perusal of Rojnona Order sheet shows that nobody is appearing for the PPetitioner even from the first date which was fixed after issuing the notices to the parties . In fact , the Petitioner never appeared before the Court right from the beginning of the case there are h reasons to continue to fis it for tiling the statement of clace. Even the workman is not taking any interest and there are no reasons to continue the proceeding . Hence lolistassed it for default and pass the negative award
Date: 29-9-2008
A. N. YADAV. PresidingOfficeT नई दिल्ली, ४ अक्तूबर , 2008
का. आ. 2998, औद्योगिक विवाद अर्थिनवन, (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में कंन्द्रीय सरकार सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबंद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 31/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-10-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
(सं. एल- 22012-292/2001-आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 8th October , 2008
S.O. 2998.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947114 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref . No. 31 2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cut- Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of WOL .. Western Coalfields Limited ( H.Q ) , and their workmen. receivedbythe Central Government an 8-10-2008 .
N1. -22012292-2001 - IR 31-0 AJAY KUMAR GAUR . Desk Olice: ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRIAN.YADAV . PRESIDING OFFICER CGIT-CUM -LABOURTCOURT, NAGPUR
Date: 29-9-20808 CaseNo.CGIT/ NGP/ 31/03
Petitioner! PartyNo. I
: Shri S 0.01sa General Secretary, Rashtriya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Sangh (INTUCC-3. Koyla Vibar . Civil Lomes . Nagpar Versus
Respondent Party No.2
The Chief General Manager, WC1.. Nagpu : Area . Jaripatka . Nagpur . AWARD (Dated 29th September, 2008 )
1. The Central Government atter satisfying the existence of dispute between Shri S Zama, General Secretary. Rashtriya Kesla Kladam Mazdoor Sangh ( INTUC ) C - 3 , Koyla Vihan . Civil mes . Nagpur (PartyNo. 19 and The Chief General Manager. Cl .. Nagpur Arca . Jaripatka, Nagpur . Paty No.2 ) reterred the same to adjudication to this tribunal wide as letter No 1. -22012 292-2001-1R( CM - 11 ) dated 28-01-2003 under clause ( d ) ot sub - Section ( 1 ) and sub - secten ( 2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Act . 1947 1401 1947 ] with the following schedule
2."Whether the actos of the managentient of Ms WCL, Nagpur in relationto Siteswara Area in dismissing the workman Shri Mohammed Lang , Loader Token No 1842 trom service w.e.f. 19-1-2001 segal and justified? If not , to whatrelief the said worknum semitled to [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
3.The reference came up for hearing on 23-9-2008 on which also the Petitioner and his Counsel are absent. They are not attending the case since last two years . He has not even filed a statement of claim. I do not think it proper to continue it on the same stage years together. It seems that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. In the cinumstances, no purpose will be served in continuing the case, hence it dismissed for the default ofthe Petitioner . I pass the negative award that he is not entitled for any relief,
Date: 29-9-2008
A. N. YADAV, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 8 अक्तूबर, 2008
का. आ. 2999. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार इण्डियन ब्यूरो आफ माइन्स के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 231/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को B- 10-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-22012/240/2002-आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 8th October , 2008
S.O. 2999.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 231 / 2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Nagpur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Indian Bureau of Mines , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 8-10-2008.
[No. L-22012/240/2002 - IR ( CM - I [) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI A. N. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM - LABOURTCOURT, NAGPUR
Date: 25-9-2008 Case No.CGIT/ NGP/231 / 03
Petitioner! Party No.1
: Shri Gurusingh Sto Shri Shankar Singh Thakur . Plot No. 132 , Rambhau Mahalgi Nagar. Hudkeshwar Road, Nagpur
Versus
Respondent : PartyNo.2
1. The Controller General, Indian Bureau ofMines, Indira Bhawan. Civil Lines , Nagpur; and
2.The Executive Engineer (Elect ), C.P.W.D. , Bungalow No. A- B , Civil Lines. Nagpur.
6013
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 1 , 2008/कार्तिक 10 , 1930
AWARD
1. The Central Government after satisfying the existence of dispute between Shri Gurusingh S/o Shri Shankar Singh Thakur, Nagpur ( Party No.1) and 1. The Controller General, Indian Bureau ofMines , Indira Bhawan, Civil Lines, Nagpur, and 2. the Executive Engineer (Elect) , C.P.W.D. , Bungalow No. A- B, Civil Lines ,Nagpur ( Party No. 2) referred the same for adjudication to this Tribunal vide its letter No.L-22012/240/2002 - IR(CM - II ) dated 30-9-2003 under clause ( d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A) ofSection 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) with the following schedule.
2. "Whether the action of the management of Indian Bureau ofMines through its Head of Office, Nagpur in terminating the services of Shri Gurusingh Sto Shri Shankar Singh Thakur as a ' Lift Operator ' is proper , legal and justified ? If not, to what relief is the said workman entitled?
3.The reference came up for hearing on 12-9-2005 on which the Respondent was absent. The Petitioner has not filed a statement of claim despite of the application dt. 18-7-2005 submitted for extension oftime to file statement of claim . It seems that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. In the circumstances , no purpose will be served in continuing the case , hence it dismissed forthedefault of the petitioner and I am passing the negative award that he is not entirled for any relief. Date: 25-9-2008
A. N. YADAV , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 8 अक्तूबर, 2008
का.आ. 3000. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सीनियर सुपरिन्टेन्डेन्ट ऑफ पोस्ट ऑफिस के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/एनजीपी/34/05 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-10-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-40012/141 /2004 - आई आर ( डी.यू.) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी- New Delhi, the 8th October , 2008
S.O. 3000.--In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref . No. CGIT/ NGP/ 34 /05 ) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court , Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Sr. Supdt. of Post Office, and their workman , which was received by the C'entral Government on 8-10-2008 .
[No. 1.-40012/ 141 /2004 - IR ( DU AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer 6014
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA. NOSI MBLR 1. 2008 KARTIKA 10. 1930
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI A.N. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER. CGIT -CUM - LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR Case No. CGIT/ NGP/34/05
Date . 30-9-2008 Petitioner/Party No. 1
Shri Pravin Dattugi Junghare, Walani Mine Post Office , Quarter No. 215 , Taluka Sene District:Nagpur
Versus
Respondent Party No. 2 The Senior Superintendent of Post Office. Nagpur Mofussil Dn . , Nagpur .
AWARD (Dated: 30th September , 2008
1. The Central Government after sarisfying the existence of dispute between Shri Pravin Pattugi Junghare . Walani Mine Post Office. Quarter No. 2-15 , Taluka Sooner District Nagpur ( Party No. 1) and the Senior Supermendent ofPostOffice, Nagpur Mofussil Dn. , Nagpur | Party No 2 referred the same tor adjudication to this Tribunal side its letter No. L-401012141-2004 - IR ( DU ) dated 10-3-2005 under clause(d) ofsulb - section ( 1 ) and sub- section ( 2Ayol Section 10of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) with the following schedule .
2."Whether the action of the management of Pantai Dapartment through its Sr. Supdt of Post Orlice. Nagpur Mofussil Dn . Phantoli Nagpur - 12 ( MS ) intermindon ol service of Shn Pravin Dattugi Junghoe , an Fx -IUM Walani Colliery Post Office , Taluka Saoner , Dish Sheper is proper , legal and justified ? If not, to what rehet to the disputant workman is entitled to ?"
2-2018 3. The reterence came up for hearing which also the Pettioner and his counsel creasers On perusal of the Rajnama , it indicates that hePeriere.Mer filing theAffidavit , the case was fixed for czesn ofthe Petitioner . However, he is not attending from 8-1-2007 . His counsel is also not alter shows that he Petitioner has no inter the case . There are no reasons to conn only waiting for Petitioner for years togel reference is dismissed for default of the Perleier ... ! pass this negative award that he is not corked for arm relief.
Date:30-9-2008
ANYADAV. es dine i नई दिल्ली. 10 अक्टूबर , 2lis
का.आ. 3001,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनि का 14 ) की धाच । के अनुसरण में, कंन्द्रीय सर ग्रामीण बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों औ बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में अं
PARS अधिकरण, धनबाद नं. का 281: 2000 : को प्रकाशित करती है , जां कंन्द्रीय नकर को 10-10-2008 को प्रग्न हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -12-179: 2000 - आईआर बी -1 ) अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th October. 2008
S.O. 3001 .-- in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1917 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 281/2000 ) of Central Government industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour Court No. 1 , Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Mithila Kshetriya Gramin Bank, and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 10-10-2008 .
[No. L -12012/ 179/2000-IR (B - 1 ) | AJAY KUMAR . Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO.1 ) AT DHANBAD PRESENT
Shri H. M. Sangh , I'residing Officer In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 30 ( 1 ) (d) and 2 (A) of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 Reference No. 281 of 2000 PARTIES:-
Employers in relation to the management of Mithila Kshetriya Gramin Bank . Darbhanga and their workman APPEARANCES :
On behalf of the workin.us
: Mr. K. Chakravarty .
On behalf of the employers
State : Jharkhand
Advocare. Mr. D. K. Verma , Advocate Industry Bankimg .
Dated, Dhanbad . Ene 22nd September, 2008 . AWARD
The Government India. Ministry of Labour in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) of the 1.1 ) . Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to ties iibunal Kon adjudication their Order No. 11-12012179 2000 JR ( B - 13 dated the 19th September. 2000.
SCHEDULE
*Whether the worsman Shri Ramakam Sahu s worked for 240 day sir the Ujjaina Branch of Mitkaa Kshetriya Gramin Bank [ ises , whether the acto the management : Mithila Kshetriya Giramir : Bank in termumating the ervices of Shri Ramakiant Sthu Casual Worker is szal and justified ? I not, what relietthe workman concerned is entole [भाग - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
6015 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 1 , 2008/ कार्तिक 10 , 1930
dt. 21-6-1997 to engage a local person for sweeping the branch office premises and fetch drinking water for the staff . The concerned workman was never taken in Bank's service and his name is not at all on the attendance register ofthe Lijjaina branch . The concerned workman hus obtained some Bank's papers / documents and get their photocopied which does not indicate that he was in Bank's Services . Further it has been stated that the Bank is a loss making Bank and is already having surplus staff in all cadres including messenger cadre due to merger of loss making Branches and conversion of some of our Branches in to satellite centres and hence , here is no vacancy in 4th Grade cadre in this Bank Moreover , there exists only one permanent sanctioned post of Messenger - cum - Sweeper for that village Branch oftice Ujjaina of the Bank and that post already been filled up by a permanent staff of Class IV cadre, the question ofregularising the concerned workman could not and did not arise . It has been further stated that the concerned workman was never appointed and taken in Bank's service, hence there is no question of his working in the Lijjaina Branch of Bank for 230 days in a calendar yeur . Theretve, the question of termination of the services ofthe concerned workman does not and cannot arise The question of compliance of Section 15F violating the principle of natural justice can never arise Accordingly it has been stated by the managemem that an Award he passed in favour of the management rejecting the claim of the concerned workman .
Both sides have filed rejoinder admitting and dens ing the comments of some of the paras of each other's WS.
2. Written Statement has been filed on behalf of the concerned workman stating therein that he has been working as permanent workman in permanent nature ofjob since 30-5-97 to 24-5-99 continuously and regularly with unblemished record of service . He was originally appointed on 30-5-97 against permanent vacancy and since the date of joining he had been working as cleaning/ sweeping mazdoor regularly to the satisfaction ofthe management .It has been alleged that the management was not maintaining statutory and other records about the engagement of the concerned workman in order to camouflage the real issue and to exploit the petitioner taking advantage of his poor financial condition. It has been further asserted that the concerned workman was working regularly under the direct control and supervision of the management and had purtin more than 240 days of attenance in each calendar year. As soon as the concerned workman started demanding regularisation the management orally stopped tite concerned workman from duty. Thereafter the concerned workman represented before the management several times against the illegal and arbitrary termination of service but without any effect . Thereafter the concerned workman raised industrial dispute before the ALC ( C ), Patna which ultimately resulted reference to this Tribunal . It has been further stated by the concerned workman that the management stopped the concerned workınan from duty without complying the provisions of Section 25F of the I.D.Act and without following the principle of natural Justice. Accordingly it has been prayed on behalf of the workman that an Award be passed in favour of the workman directing the management to reinstate the concerned workman to his original job with full back wages and other attendant benefil .
5. The workman side in order to substantiate his claim has examined ' W - 1 Rama Kant Sao and proved Ext.W- 1 . Management examined MW- 1 Ganesh Verma and proved Ext.M - 1.M - 1-1 and M-2,
3. In the W.S. submitted by the management it has been stated, that the present reference is not legally maintainable. This is an individual dispute and as such the same is beyond the scope of adjudication by the Hon'ble Tribunal . It has been submitted that the concerned workman was terminated from his services w.e.f. 25-5-1999 and he did not raise any demand either before the management or before the ALC ( C) for a long period IHe for the first time made his representation before the conciliation officer on 30-11-1999 and the conciliation officer issued notice to the management on 22-12-1999 for attending his office relating to the case of the concerned workman . Therefore , the concerned workınan raised the present demand after a long period of more than six months before the ALC (Central ) Patna and the present reference should not have been made by the appropriate Government . It has been stated further that there is a general instruction to all the branches of the Bank to engage a local coolie on contractual basis for an hour or so for a day on the days of his engagement during temporary absence ofthe permanent messenger to bring drinking water and to fill the same in a pitcher for the staff members and to clean and sweep the Branch office. Accordingly the Head Office of the Bank had instructed the Ujjaina Branch vide letter
6. Ed. Counsel for the workman argued that he has called for two items of documents vide petition dated 29-10-2001 regarding payment vouchers for the period 30-5-97 to25-5-99 and letters dated 23-7-98 and 17-5-99. But the management have failed to file those documents and therefore adverse inference has to be drawn against the management , In this respect as per oral evidence the concemed workman has stated in his cross - examination that he was appointed verbally and no appointment letter was given to him and that he had not filed any application for supplying a copy of this letter. The Branch Manager gave him suo moto . He has further stated in his cross- examination that it is not a fact that there was no mention ofmy name in the original letter dated 17-5-99 . Vide Ext.M - 1 but I have filed the xerox copy of the same by entering my name vide Ext.M - 1/ 1 . " No appointment letter has been filed by the workman . Verbally appointment of any workman cannot be made by any institute . As per photo copy ofthe letter dated 21-6-97 ( M - 121 ) it shows that the said letter has been issued by the Branch manager, Mithila Kshetriya Gramin bank wherein the name ofthe concerned workman PART 11-St . St1 ) | 6016
THI : GAZETTE OF INDIA NOVEMBER 1 , 2008 / KARTIKA 10, 19540
engage the employee continuously amounts to unfair labour practice
1,d. Counsel for the workman also referred to a decision reported in 20611081.K. 213 in which Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down the following :-
Industrial Disputes Act. 1947--- Section 25F Burden of proof-As to the completion of 240 days of continuous work in earls on the clamant to show that he had workeil for 240 days Burden is discharged as a witness However mere atlīdavits or self serving staternents by claimant workman will ποι suffice in discharge of burden .
Daily wages - Statement Should take steps to maintain propecoris of services rendered by dailywagers .
Industrial Disputes 1.. 15447 Section 10 - vidence Act In terms dut apply to proceedings unkler section 10 of the As:
Industrial Disput Act , 1947 Section 25-1 Continuous work for 240 days Since initial burden was not discharged urkman Industrial &Court High Court had erred in ordered reinstatement solely on an adverse inference drawn erroneously .
is mentioned. But in the original ( Ext.M - 1 ) his name does no1 figure anywhere . L.d Counsel for the workman argued that MW- I stated in his deposition that he was not posted in the Branch during the period from 30-5-97 to 25-5-99. This does not affect in any way the case of the management . Managers and officers come and go in course of their employment . MW -1 in his cross - examinarion stated that cleaning job and the job of messenger are continuous in nature and are required to be performed regularly . He has also stated in his deposition that he does not have the personal knowledge in regard to the engagement of the concerned workman and that as to for how long in a moth the concerned workman worked in the said branch of the Bank . He has also stated in his deposition in crosse examination that he knows about those documents which were called for from the management at the tostance of the concerned workomen , and that it is true that the records are maintained in the Bank so far as complete finansal transactions are concerned . He has stated that the records are maintained in the Bank to show as to when and how the reimbursement was made and from the records it can he gathered as to how much amount was made to the workman working on casual hasis and for how many days. It shows that the management has not produced the docuitiems called for by the workman in order to suppress the Thule It also shows that management does not want to come with clean hands .
d. Counsel for them also referred to another decision reported in 20102011 N. 368 in which Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down the following
Industrial Disputes Act 1947 Contrast lahut (Regulation and Abolition Act . 1970. $-10 7. Ld . Coutiset for the workinan based bisugunment on Ext.W- 1 which is a letter written by the Branch Manager . Mithila Kshetriya Grantin Bank to head office of the saist Bank regarding engagement of the concerned workman Rs . 10 per day is dans winges hislettet has been en with a view to enhance his wages front Rs . 10 as this is insufficient . This letter only shows that the congened workman has been engaged on daily wage basts .
Retrenchment denial dispute raised con Retrenchinem Appellant -camploser contending that word itou were not direct comployees contract labourers appreciation of facts holding that works were not contract abингета but were direct crees sod should be deemed t be continuing an service Whether the Irmhungıl traversed beyond the reference Held when the appellant had claimed workmen to be cotidianl workers the name of their employment necessarily to be decided Orderof Tribunal const be seriously assailed " !
8. In this respect the workman side has telened decisions of th : Hon'ble Pains High Court reported m esit Lab 1.0 669 m which Hon'ble Court held Industrial Disputes Act ( 1947 ) Sections 2 ( k ) , 2A badustrial dispute- Seasonal factory Removing a workman from permanent service and allowing him to contimie as seasonal worker . Dispute as to Amounts to an industrial dispute In the present case the workman concerned is not in perinatient service . L.d. Counsel for the workmos also releized l another decision reported in 1.1.1.1 1986 page 1.17 in whis.h Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down the following
9 Ld, counsel tor maagement referred twa decision reported in 2002: 11.38282 ( SC - Secretins State of Karnataka . Appellants & Ors vs. U ma Devi & Ors, respondents in wh Hon'ble Supreme down the following : Laid
wine powe Constitution Irska Amele 220 thereunder - Courts should desist tror assaing oolers for continuance of those who have not regular appoints as perestablished procedure -wide pussers under Ancie 2260e1not intended to be used for the purpose prepetuating illegainies irregularities or nepriesesor for scutthey the whoic scheme of puhi . rotusment High Court is the Industrial Disputes Act - 1917-5%. 2012 1,24 2513, 251 , Schedule V Item No 10 - Name of enplesee who is provided with work whenever avokable Mu off from the list ot Tikka Mazdoor Relusal provide work No written orders of termination on the specious plea that he was disqualified for the post being a Matriculate, based on confidential Circular Action of the Management stosufits t retrenchment and the sathe is in violation of the mandatory provisions The dispare comes seppuately withn S.2 ( A ) of the ID Act Deliberate retusaito [ भाग 1]- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
6017 भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 1 , 2008 /कार्तिक 10 , 1930
the court ( litigious employment ) he would notbe entitled to be absorbed or made permanent. ( Para 34) Courts are not to ignore , encourage or approve appointments made or engagements given outside the constitutional scheme.
2006 (2) SCALE 115 : JT 2006 (2) SC 1 : 2006 (2 ) PLJR (SC) 1 : 2006 (2 ) JLJR ( SC) 80 - Relied upon. AIR 1984 SC 363- Referred 10.
Service Law- Pay equal pay for equal work - while accepting employment , daily wages or casual or temporary, person concerned knows the nature of his empolyment and wages to be paid - daily wagers form a class by themselves they cannot claim discrimination with regular employees - equal work they cannot be treated at par with regular employees -Articles 14 and 16 not attracted ( Paras 36 and 39 ) .
Asper law laiddown by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the Uma Devi's case persons on daily wage casual basis are not entitled to be regularised even though in the present case management has not come with clean hands and has not filed record to this Tribunal to assess the case of the workman. Hence , the following Award is rendered:-
Service Law- Appointments -no employment is envisaged outside the constitutional scheme and without following the requirements set down therein- equality of opportunity is the hallmark -provisions exist for affirmative action to ensure that unequals are not treated equals though the Government is not precluded from making temporary appointments, regular appointments must be the rule - Constitutional scheme of public empolyment flows from Articles 14, 16, 315 , 320 and 335-in absence of any right to a post or to a particular status , appointment cannot be deemed to be valid-directions for re- engagement of such persons in any other work would make judicial process another mode of recruitment de hors the rules.
(Paras 10 , 12 , 22, 24, 27 and 40)
" As the concerned workman Ramakant Sabu has failed to prove that he has worked for 240 days the question of his termination by the management of Mithila Kshetriya Gramin Bank does not arise . Consequently, the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief. "
H. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer. नई दिल्ली , 21 अक्तूबर, 2008 Service-Law- Regularisation only something that is irregular for want of compliance with one of the elements in the process of selection which does not go to the root of the process , can be regularised and that it alone can be regularised granting permanence of employment is a totally different concept-Courts ought not to imose a tinancial burden on the State of directions for regularisation or permanence . ( Paras 14 and 17)
1967 ( 1 ) SCR 128.( 1972 ) 2 SCR 799 ( 1979 ) 3 SCR 937
Relied upon .
1988 ( 1 ) SCR 598 1989 Suppl . ( 2 ) SCR 513- Distinguished.
1990 ( 1 ) SCR 544 - Not binding precedent .
का.आ. 3002.-कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 34 ) की धारा की उपधारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा । नवम्बर, 2008 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधि नियम के अध्याय-4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा-76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा- 77, 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध पश्चिम बंगाल के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्,
1991 Suppl . (3 ) SCR 553 -Relied upon .
" जिला बर्दमान के बामुनारा एवं बॉसकोपा मौजा के क्षेत्रों को शामिल करके । "
[ सं. एस -38013/41/2008 - एस.एस.1 ] एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 21st October , 2008 Service Law- Appointment - equality- rule of equality in public appointments is a basic constitutional feature -unless appointment is in terms of relevant rules and after a proper competition same would not confer any right on the appointees contractual appointment ends with the contract daily wages or casual appointment ends with discontinuation Iemporary appointee cannot claim permaneney on expiry oftheterm-by merely working for a long time one does not acquire a right for regularisation- such persons cannot invoke doctrine of legnimate expectation .
1973 Suppl. SCR 1 : 1999 Suppt ( 5 ) SCR229 : ( 1987 ) 1 SCR 798 (2004 ) 7 SCC 122 - Relied upon .
( 1990 ) | SCR $44 : ( 1992 ) 3 SCR 826 - Discussed .
S.O. 3002. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948 ), the Central Goverment hereby appoints the Ist November, 2008 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter V and VI except sub - section ( i ) of Section 76 and Section 77 , 78. 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of West Bengal namely: --
"Areas comprising Mouzas of Bamunara and Hanskopa in the District of Burdwan" .
[No S - 38013 /41/2008 -S. S.1 ] S.D. XAVIER , Under Secy .
Service Law-Absorption High Court should not U /Art 226. ordinarily issue directions for absorption regularisation or permanent continuance unless the recruitment itselfwas made regularly and in terms of the constitutional scheme merely because an employce had continued under cover or an order of THE GAZETTE OF INDIA NOVEMBER 1 , 2008/ KARTIKA 10, 1930
6018
नई दिल्ली, 30 अक्तूबर , 2008
का. आ. 3003 , कंन्द्रीय सरकार , सिनमा कर्मकार कल्याण निधि अधिनियम , 1981 ( 198 ) का 33 ) की धारा ५ के अनुमरण में, वर्ष 2007-2008 के लिए उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन लेखाओं का विवरण और वित्त पोषित क्रियाकलापों की रिपोर्ट, अनुसूची-1 और अनुसूची-2 के अनुसार क्रमशः निम्न प्रकार से प्रकाशित करती है :
अनुसूची. - 1
वर्ष 2007-2008 के लिए सिनेमा कर्मकार कल्याण निधि के लेखाओं का विवरण आय
1-4-2007 को आंधिक बकाया
[PART II Sic. 3 ) मुख्य शौर्य- 2230
01,110 सिनेमा कर्मकार कल्याण निधि 01,110.03 शिक्षा
व्यय
इकाई
लेखा काशीर्ष
( हजार रुपए में)
1114 03.00.34
छात्रवृांत और वृत्तिन्का
अन्य प्रभार
03.00.50
दांग
315)
ださい
याग सिलमा ( 2231 )
म ।.। करोड़
वर्ष के दौरान अंतरित उपकर
रु. 1.35 कगड़
मुख्य शीर्ष 4250- मिनेमा कर्मकार कल्याण निधि
म. ३.०० कगड़
कुल आय
व्यय
मुख्यशीर्ष 2230
01,110 सिनेमा कर्मकार कल्याण निधि 01,110,02- प्रशासन
इत्काई
लेखा का शीर्ष
(हजार रुपए में। 02.00.11
घरेलू वात्रा व्यय
कार्यालय त्र्यय
02.00.13
21.1 मुख्यशीर्ष 2230
01.110 मिनेमा कर्मकार कल्याण निधि 01,110,04- स्वास्थ्य
लेखा का शीर्ष
(हजार पहा :
वतन
04.00.01
04.00.02
मजदूरी
04.00.6
चिकित्सीय उपचार
125 04.00.11
घरेलू यात्रा व्यय
20
कार्यालय व्यय
04.000.13
04.00.14
किराया , दर और कर
सामग्री और प्रदाय
04.00.21
अन्य प्रभार
04.00.50
यांग
153
मोटर बन
153
यः विसय ( 4750 )
रु. 306 करोड़ कुल आय
रु. १.०८ करोड कुल व्यय
अनुमृची ।।
वर्ष 2007-2008 के दौरान मिनेमा कर्मकार कल्याण निधि के
अधीन वित्त पोषित क्रियाकलाप
इकाट क्रम स
क्रियाकलाप नान
:
2
क. स्वास्थ्य:
1 .
स्थिर- यह चलवंस्थ
आयुर्वेदिक औषधालय
2. औषधात्लय में उपायां
की संख्या
कैंसर रोग का उप-गः
+.
in हृदय रोग का उपचार
5.
किडनी रोग का
i छोटे रोग
चश्मों का क्रय
Χ.
प्रसूति प्रसुविधा काम
ख. सामाजिक सुरक्षा :
1) ग्रुप बीपा म्कोम [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1
2
3 ग. शिक्षा :
1894 10. सिनेमा कर्मकारों के विद्यालय जाने वाले बालकों को छात्रवृत्ति दिया जाना ।
11. सिनेमा कर्मकारों के विद्यालय जाने वालं बालकों को पुस्तक/ युनिर्फाम का प्रदाय 144
[फा. सं. एस-51025/ 1 / 08 डब्ल्यू ।। ] अनिल स्वरूप , महानिदेशक ( श्रम कल्याण ) संयुक्त सचिव NewDelhi , the 30th October, 2008
S.O. 3003.-In pursuance of Section 9 of the Cine Workers Welfare Fund Act, 1981 ( 33 of 1981 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the statement of accounts and the report of the activities financed under the said Act, for the year 2007-2008 as per Schedule- [ and Schedule- II , respectively , as under:
CINE WORKERS WELFARE FUND
SCHEDULE - J
STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS
INCOME
Rs . 1.71 crores Opening Balance as on 1-4-2007
Rs 135 crores Cess tansferred during the year
Total Income
Rs .3.06 crores MajorHead-2230
01.110 -Cine Workers Welfare Fund 01.110.02 -Administration
Units
Expenditure Head ofA/ c
(Rs . in thousand) 02.00.11
120 Domestic Travel Expenses
2.00.13
94 OfficeExpenses
Total
214 MajorHead-2230
01.110-Cine Workers Welfare Fund 01.110,04- Health
Units
Expenditure Head ofA/ c
(Rs . in thousand) 04.00.01
3087 Salaries
04.00.02
8 Wages
04.00.06
33 Medical Treatment
04.00.11
125 DomesticTravel Expenses
04.00.13
230 OfficeExpenses
04.00.14
58 Rents , Rates and Taxes
04.00.21
964 Material and Supply
04.00.50
1656 Other Charges
Total
6161
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 1. 2008/ कार्तिक 10 , 1930
6019 Major Head -22.30
01.110 -Cine Workers Welfare Fund 01,110.03 - Education
Units
Head ofAic
Expenditure (Rs . in thousand) 03.00 34
3114 Scholarships and Stipend
03.00.50
37 Other Charges
Total
3151 Total Cine ( 2230 )
9526 Major Head-4250- Cine Workers Welfare Fund
Health
153 Motor Vehicle
153 Total CINE Health (4250 )
Grand Total
9679 Total Income
3.06 crores
0.97 crores Total Expenditure
SCHEDULE- II
ACTIVITIES FINANCED UNDER THE CINE- WORKERS WELFARE FUND DURING THE YEAR
2007-08
Units Serial Name of the Activity No.
A. Health .
1 . Static-cum-Mobile Static Allopathic and Static Ayurvedic Dispensaries
86038 2. Number ofpatients Treated in dispensaries
2 3. Treatment of cancer
4.
18 Treatment for Heart disea
5. Treatment for Kidney disease
6. Minor Diseases F 7. Purchase of Spectacles
8. MaternityBenefit scheme
B. SOCIAL SECURITY :
||| 68 9. Group Insurance Scheme
C. EDUCATION :
1894 10. Award of Scholarships to the school going children of Cine Workers
11 . Supply of Book? Uniform to the school going children of Cine Workers
[ F. No.S- 51025 108 -W.JI ANIL SWARUP , Director General ( Labour Welfarej
Jt. Secy.
6020
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVI MIBER 1.2008 ΚΑΚΤΙΚΑ 10 , 19.300
i
नई दिल्ली, 30 अक्तूबर , 2008
::
102,00.13
17:
(12.00.14
02 こ?
का. आ. 3004, कंन्द्रीय सरकार , चूना पत्थर र इलाम खान श्रम कल्याण निधि अधिनियम, 1972 ( 1972 का 62 ) जया 10 के अनुसरण में वर्ष 2007-2008 के लिए उक्त आंनियम के अधीन लेखाओं का विवरण और वित पोषित क्रियाकलापों की अनुसूची-1 और अनुसूची-2 के अनुसार क्रमशः निम्न प्रकार से प्रकाशित करती है: -
02.00.31
महण अनुदन अनुसूची- 1
02.00.50
चूना पत्थर और डोलोमाइट खान श्रम कल्याण निधि के लेखाओं का विवरण आय
रु. 53.6 करंड
1-4-2007 को आंभिक बकाया
मुख्य शीर्ष 2230 वर्ष के दौरान अंतरित उपकर
रु. 22.56 करोड़
01,107 चूना पत्थर और डोलोमाइट खान श्रम कल्याण निधि
रु. 70.17 करोड
कुल आय
01.107.06 शिक्षा
लेखा का शीर्ष
व्यय 2230 मुख्य शीषं
हजार रुपए में 01.107 चूना पत्थर और डोलोमाइट खान श्रप कल्याण निश्चि
01,107.01- प्रशासन
155
(16.02.01
इकाई
लेखा का शीर्ष
002.11
हजार रुपा ご
1142
समई और प्रदाय
42.21
117
वेतन
01.00.01
विज्ञापन और प्रचार
06.02.26
142
मजदूरी
01.00.02
45
小心!
अतिकाल भत्ता
01.00.03
06.02.31
महाश्यन अनुदान
US
चिकित्सीय उपचार
01.00.06
11212
106.02.34
सात्रवृति और वृनिका OL.00.11
घरेलू यात्रा व्यव
प्रभार
06.02.50
कार्यालय व्यन
01.00.13
리기
42:
01.00.14
किराया , दर और कर
मुख्य शीर्ष 2230 प्रकाशन
01.00.16
01.00.28
01.107 चूना पत्थर और डोलोमाइट खान अप कल्याण निधि वृत्तिक सेवाएं
01.107.03- मनोरंजन योग
लंखा का शीर्ष
मुख्य शीर्ष 2230
01,107 चूना पत्थर और डोलोमाइट खान श्रम कल्याण निधि
01,107.02- स्वास्थ्य
1
लेखा का शीर्ष
इकाई
03.00.01
हजार में:
03.00.03
3
]
03.00.06
02.00.01
03.00.11
02.00.02
मजदूरी
03.00.13
अतिकाल भन्ना
02.00.03
05.00.14
चिकित्सीय अपनाः
02.00.06
13.00.11
02.00.11
घरेलू यात्रा व्यव 6021 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 1 , 2008/कार्तिक 10 , 1930
2
2
1
3
3
2
50
405795 03.00.27
लघु कार्य
औषधालयों/अस्पतालों में उपचार किए गएरोगी
1425
03.00.31
सहायता अनुदान
1
3.
अन्य प्रभार
365
03.00.50
तपेदिक से पीड़ित चूना पत्थर और डॉलोमाइट खान कर्मकारों का आवासीय उपचार योग
5009
4.
मुख्य शीर्ष - 2230
कैंसर पीड़ित चूना पत्थर और डोलोमाइट खान कर्मकारों का उपचार
5. मानसिक रोगों का उपचार
1 01.107 चूना पत्थर और डोलोमाइट खान श्रम कल्याण निधि 01,107,04- आवास
6
चश्मों का क्रय
286 इकाई
लेखा का शीर्ष
7.
L
व्यय (हजार रुपए में )
महिला चूना पत्थर और डोलोमाइट खान कर्मकारों के लिए प्रसूति प्रसुविधा स्कीम वेतन
932
04.01.01
8.
1
200
04.02.31
चूना पत्थर और डोलोमाइट खान कर्मकारों की नसबंदी के लिए धन संबंधी प्रतिकर का संशय निम्न लागत गृह निर्माण स्कीम
9.
1
एंबुलेंस क्षेन का उपापन
04.03.31
2005
7
10. हृदय रोग का उपचार
बीवाईओएचएस- सहायता अनुदान
11. गुर्दा रोग का उपचार
योग
3137
12 . अंतयेष्टि के लिए वित्तीय सहायता
81262
योग(2230 )
ख. आवास
13.
262 मुख्य शीर्ष 4250- चूना पत्थर और डोलोमाइट खान श्रम कल्याण निधि-स्वास्थ्य
मोटर यान
744
मशीनरी और उपस्कर
5
अपना स्वगृह निर्माण करो स्कीम, सामूहिक गृह निर्माण स्कीम , आर्थिक रूप से कमजोर वर्ग स्कीम , टाईप 1 और 2 गृह निर्माण स्कीम के अधीन स्वीकृत गृहों की संख्या
749
कुल योग
ग. शिक्षा
14.
708452 मुख्य शीर्ष- 4250- चूना पत्थर और डोलोमाइट खान श्रम कल्याण निधि-मनोरंजन
चूना पत्थर और डोलोमाइट खान कर्मकारों के स्कूल जाने बाल बालकों को छात्रवृति और अन्य वित्तीय सहायता प्रदान करना ।
21
मोटर यान
[5.
6113
वर्दीः पाठ्यपुस्तकों का प्रदाय
योग
21
16.
5
770
स्कूल बस के लिए अनुदान
योग (4250)
17. पुस्तकालयों के लिए अनुदान
82032
कुल योग
घ. मनोरंजन :
76. 17 करोड़
कुल आय
18
24
8. 20 करोड़
कुल व्यय
अनुसूची -I।
श्रव्य दृश्य सेटों/सिनेमा वेनों के माध्यम से चूना पत्थर और डोलोमाइट खान कर्मकारों के लिए फिल्मों का प्रदर्शन
19.
41 वर्ष 2007-2008 के दौरान चूना पत्थर और डोलोमाइट खान श्रम कल्याण निधि के अधीन वितपोषित क्रियाकलाप
क्रम सं.
क्रियाकलाप का नाम
इकाई
चूना पत्थर और डोलोमाइट खान कर्मकारों के लिए क्रीड़ाओं, खेलकूद , सामाजिक और सांस्कृतिक क्रियाकलापों का आयोजन ।
20.
3 1 2 3
यातायात के लिए बस
क. स्वास्थ्य:
2
21. टीवीसेंट
32
1.
22. खेलकूद के सामान की खरीद
स्थिर-सह- गतिशील /स्थिर एलोपैथिक और स्थिर आयुर्वेदिक औषधालय
4026 G1/08-6 6022
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA . NOVEMBER 1,2008/ KARTIKA 10 , 1930
3 छु जलप्रदाय
23. लघु ग्वानों को सहायता
24. बड़ी खार्ता की सहायता
Head of ' c
[फा. सं. एस-50025/4/08 11 | अनिल स्वरूप , महानिदेशक ( श्रम कल्याण ) संयुक्त सचिव New Delhi , the 30th October , 2008
S.O. 3004. In pursuance of Section 10 of the Limestone and Dulomine Mines Labour Welfare Fund Act , 1972 (62 of 1972 , the t'entral Government hereby publishes the statement of accounts and the report of the activites financed under the said Act, for the year 2007-08 as per Schedule -I and Schedule II , respectively , as ander :
SCHEDULE - 1
STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS OF THE LIMESTONI : AND DOLOMITE MINES LABOUR WELFARE
FUND
INCOME
Rs . 53.01 co Opening Balance as on 1-4-2007
Rs . 22.50 SOLES Cess tansferred during the year
Rs. 76.17 mores Total Incomes
EXPENDITURE
Major Head-2230
01,107-Limestone and Dolomite Mines Labour Welfare
Fund
01.107.01 - Administration
Head
ofAc
Expendirare (Rs . in thousa 3
3 1
11:30 01.00.01 Salaries
01.00.02 Wages
Overtime Allowance
01.00.03
01.00.06 Medical Treatment
01.00,11 Domestic Travel Expenses
Head
01.00.13 Office Expenses
421 01.00.14 Rents. Rates and taxes
-11 01.00.16 Publication
01.00.28 Professional Services
15801 Total
[PART 11 SEC. 3 ( 11) ] Major Head- 2230
01.107 -Limestone and Dolomite Mines Labour Welfare Fund
01,107.02 - Health
Units
Expenditure (Rs . in thousand)
23547
02.00.01 Salaries
365
02.00.02 Wages
Overtime Altowance
02.00.03
02.00.06
188 Medical Treatment
380
02.00.11 Domestic Travel Expenses
1172
02.00.13 OfficeExpenses
470
02.00.14 Rents. Rates and Taxes
02.00.21 Material and Supply
Minor Work
02.0027
11351
02.00.31 Grants- in - ail
02.00.50
553 Other Charges
43359 Total
Major Head -2230
01.107-Limestone and Dolomite Mines Lahour Welfare Final
01.10.06 - Education
Units
Head ofA/ c
Expenditure (Ren thousand
158
06.02.01 Salaries
5
06.02.11 Domestic re ! Fspenses
1142
06.02 21 Material and Supply
7
06.02.26 Advertisement and Publicity
191
06.12.31 Grants- in-aud
06.02.34 Scholarships and Stipend
171
06.02.50 Other Charges
1-1846 Total
Major lead - 22300
01.107 -Limestone and Dolomite Mines Labour Welfare Fund
01.107.03- Recreation
Units
Espenditure
(Rs . in thousand 2
2570 Salaries
03.00.01
Ovetime Allowance
03.00.03
34 Medical Treaument
03.00.06 [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3(ii ) ]
6023 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 1 , 2008 /कार्तिक 10 , 1930
3
SCHEDULE- II
03.00.11 DomesticTravel Expenses 114
03.00.13
95
OfficeExpenses
ACTIVITIES FINANCED UNDER THE LIMESTONE AND DOLOMITE MINES LABOUR WELFARE FUND DURING THE YEAR 2007-08 03.00.14
161
Rents, Rates and Taxes
Linits
Name of the Activity
03.00.21
184
Material and Supply
Serial No.
03.00.27 Minor Work
L
2 3 03.00.31 Grants-in-aid
1425
A. HEALTH ;
03.00.50 Other Charges 365
L.
32 Total
5009
Static-cum-Mobile/Static Allopathic and Statice Ayurvedic Dispensaries
2
405795
Patients treated in Dispensaries/ Hospitals
MajorHead-2230
3.
1 01.107- Limestone and Dolomite Mines Labour Welfare Fund
Domiciliary Treatment of Limestone and Dolomite Mines workers suffering from Tuberculosis
01.107.04- Housing
4.
Treatment of Limestone and Dolomite Mines Workers suffering from Cancer.
Units
Expenditure
Head of Accounts
5. Treatment for mental discuses (Rs. in thousand)
6.
286
Purchase of Spectacles
04.01.01 Salaries
932
7.
04.02.31 Low Cost Housing Scheme 300
Maternity Benefit Scheme for Female Limestone and Dolomite Mines Workers.
04.03.31 BYOHS-Grants - in-aid 2005
Total 3137
Payment of Monetary Compensation for Sterilisation to Limestone and DolomiteMines Workers .
81262
Total (2230)
9. Procurement of ambulance van Major Head -4250- Limestone and Dolomite Mines Labour Welfare Fund
3
10. Treatmentfor Heart Disease
Health
11 . Treatment for Kidney Disease Motor Vehicle
744
12.
8
Finanial assistance for Funeral
B. Housing:
Machinery and Equipment 5
13.
262 Total
749
Major Head-4250- Limestone and Dolomite Mines Labour Welfare Fund
Number of houses sanctioned under Build Your Own House Scheme ,Group Housing Scheme. Economically Weaker Section Scheme Type- I and II Ilousing Scheine.
Recreation
C. Education :
21
MotorVehicle
14.
708452 Total
21
770
Total(4250)
Award of Scholarship and other financial assistance to the schoul going children of Limestone and DolomiteMines Workers
15.
6113 Grand Total
82032
Supply of uniform/text books
16.
5
Grant for school bus
Total Income
Rs . 76.17 crores
17. Grant for libraries
Rs. 8.20 crores
Total Expenditure 6024
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 1 , 2008 /KARTIKA 10, 1930
3
2
D.Recreation;
01.00.11
24
01.00.13
01.00.27
18. Exhibition of films for Limestone and Dolomite Mines workers through Audio- visual Sets/Cinema Vans .
41
01.00.28
01.00.50
19. Organizing sports , games , social and cultural activities for Limestone and Dolomite Mines Warkers,
3 20. Bus for transportation
2 21. TV Sets
8 22. Purchase of Sports Goods E.Water Supply
1 23. Assistance to small mines
[ PART 11-SEC. 30
2
3
it घरेलू यात्रा व्यय
50 कार्यालय व्यय
लघु कार्य
0 वृतिक संषाएं
अन्य प्रभार
याग
2260 मुख्य शीर्ष 2230
01,105 अभ्रक खान श्रम कल्याण निधि 01.105.02- स्वास्थ्य
व्यय
लेखा काशीर्ष
t 24. Assistance to big mines
[F. No. S-50025/4/08 - W.II ]
1 ANIL SWARUP , Director General ( Labour Welfare)/
02.00.01
J. Secy.
02.00.02
नई दिल्ली, 30 अक्तूबर, 2008
02.00.06
02.00.11
02.00.13
02.00.14
02.00.21
का, आ. 3005.- केन्द्रीय सरकार , अभ्रक खान श्रम कल्याण निधि अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का 22 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में वर्ष 2007-2008 के लिए उक्त अधि निमम कसे अधीन लेखाओं का विवरण और वित्त पोषित क्रियाकलापों श्री रिपोर्ट, अनुसूची -1 और अनुसूची-2 के अनुसार क्रमशः निम्न प्रकार से प्रकाशित करती है : -
अनुसूची -1
अभ्रक स्वान श्रम कल्याण निधि के लेखाओं का विवरण आए
रु. 3.70करोड़ 1-4-2007 को आरंभिक बकाया
इकाई
(हजार रुपए में)
3 2
वेतन
5712
25 मजदूरी
139 चिकित्सीय उपचार
52 घरेलू यात्रा व्यय
कार्यालय व्यच
( i किराया , दर और कर
सामग्री और प्रदाय
833
6858 मुख्य शीर्ष 2230
01.105 अश्वक खान श्रम कल्याण निधि 01,105.03- शिक्षा
इकाई
लेखा का शीर्ष
रु. 3.51 करोड़ वर्ग के दौरान अंतरित उपकर
है. 7.21 करोड़ कुल भात्र
03.00.01
03.00.02
मुख्य शीर्ष- 2230
03.00.06
03.00.11
01.105 अधुक खाम अम कल्याण विधि 01.105.01- प्रशासन
03.00.13
लेखा का शौर्य
इकाई
03.00.21
(हजार रुपए में)
03.00.27
2
3
03.00.31
2098
वेतन
01.00.01
03.00.34
41 01.00.02
मजदूरी
03.00.50
20
चिकित्सीय उपचार
01.00.06
( हजार रुपए में ) बेतन
201 मजदूरो
चिकित्सीय उपनार
75 घरेलू यात्रा व्यय
?
कार्यालय उपय
सामग्री और प्रदाय
लघु कार्य
!i सहायता अनुदान
छात्रवृत्ति और वृत्तिका
अन्य प्रभार
2568 योग [भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर , 2008 कार्तिक 10 , 1930
मुख्य शीर्ष - 2230 .
01.105 अभ्रक खान श्रम कल्याण निधि 01,105,04- मनोरंजन
1946 ( 22 of 1946 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the statement of accounts and the report of the activites financed under the said Act , for the year 2007-08 as per Schedule -I and Schedule - II , respectively , as under :
SCHEDULE - I
लेखा का शीर्ष
इकाई
व्यय
( हजार रुपए में )
STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS OF THE MICA MINIES LABOUR WELFARE FUND 04.00.01
वेतन
455
INCOME
04.00.06
चिकित्सीय उपचार
11
Rs 3.70 crores
Opening Balance as on 1-4-2007
04.00.11
4
Rs 3.50 crores घरेलू यात्रा व्यय
Cess transferred during the year
Total Income
Rs . ? 21 crores 04.00.21
सामग्री और प्रदाय
EXPENDITURE
04.00.50
अन्य प्रभार
2
Major Head-2230
470
योग मनोरंजन
12156
कुल योग अभ्रक
01.105- Mica Mines Labour Welfare Fund 01.105.01 - Administration कुल आय
रु. 7.21 करोड़
Linits
Head of Ac
Expenditure (Rs . in thousand ) कुल व्यय
रु. 1. 22करोड़
01.00.01 Salaries
2098 अनुसूघी - 11
01.00.02
41
Wages
01.00.06 Medical Treatment
20 वर्ष 2007-2008 के दौरान अभ्रक खान श्रम कल्याण निधि के अधीन वित्तपोषित क्रियाकलाप
01.00.11
+1
Domestic Travel Expenses क्रम सं. क्रियाकलाप का नाम
इकाइया
01.00.13 Office Expenses
1
2
01.00.27 MinorWork
3
0
01.00.28
0
Professional services
क, स्वास्थ्य:
01.00.50
1
Other Charges
1 .
08
2260 स्थिर-सह- चल/स्थिर एलोपैधिक और स्थिर आयुर्वेदिक औषधालय
Major Head- 22.30
2.
अभ्रक खान कर्मकारों के लिए अस्पताल
10
3
3886-4
01.105 -Mica Mines Labour Welfare Fund 01.105.02 - Health
रोगी जिनका अस्पतालों औषधालायों में उपचार किया गया
Limits
ख शिक्षा :
Head ofAt
Expenditure (Rs . in thousand ) 4.
2
3 अभ्रक खान कर्मकारों के विद्यालय जाने वाले बालकों को छात्रवृत्ति दिया जाना
02.00 아
5712
Salaries
5.
3 02.0002 Wages
अभ्रक खान कर्मकारों के विद्यालय जाने वाले बालकों को किताब वर्दी को आपूर्ति
02.00.06
139
Medical Treatment
02.00.11
[फा. सं. एस-22025/ 1 / 08 - डब्ल्यू. ][ ]
Domestic Travel Expenses
02.00.13 Office Expenses
अनिल स्वरूप, महानिदेशक ( श्रम कल्याण ) संयुक्त सचिव
02.00.14
10
Rents , Rates and Taxes
New Delhi , the 30th October. 2008
02.00.21
833
Material and Supply
$.O. 3005.-In pursuance of sub- Section 4 of Section 3 of the Mica Mines Labour Welfare Fund Acı .
Total
6858 [ PARI 11 -SC30m ) 6026
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA NOVEMBER 1 , 2008 / KARTIKA 10 , 1930
3
2
Major Head-2230
+ 01.105-Mica Mines Labour Welfare Fund
04,00.11 Domestic Travel Expenses
01.105.03- Education
04.00.21 Material and Supply
2
04.00.50 OtherCharges
Units
Head ofA/ c
Expenditure (Rs . in thousand )
470
Total Recreation
12156
3
Grand Total MICA
1
2
Rs . 7.21 crores
Total Income
03.00.01 Salaries
Rs . 1.22 crores
Totat Expenditure
03.00.02 Wages
SCHEDULE- LL
03.00.06 Medical Treatment
75
03.00.11 Doniestic Travel Expenses
03.00.13 Office Expenses
ACTIVITIES FINANCEDI NDER THE MICA MINES LABOUR WELFARE FUND DURING THE YEAR 2017-08
03.00.21 Material and Supply
Name of the Activily
Minor Work
03.00.27
Serial No.
Grants- in - aid
03.00.31
A. HEALTH :
84
08 03.00.34 Scholarships and Stipend
1.
Static-cum-Mobile Static Allopathic and Static Ayurvedic Dispensaries
03.00.50 Other Charges
2.
7568
Hospitals for the Mica Mines workers .
Total
3886-4
3
MajorHead- 2230
Patients treated in Hospitals Dispensaries
01.105-Mica Mines Labour Welfare Fund
B. Education :
01.105.04 - Recreation
] (4
1 Award of Scholarship to the school going children of Mica Mines Workers Units
3
Expenditure (Rs . in thousand)
Head ofA /c
5. Supply of Book Liniform to the school going children of Mica Mines Workers 1
2
( F. No. S-220251 08-4111
455
04.00.01 Salaries
ANIL SWARUP , Director General ( Labour Welfares 04.00.06
h. Secy Medical I reatment
Mayapuri New
Phened by the Manager, frost of India Press. Ring Road, and Published by the Coursiteto Pubticahves . Delhi - 1101