This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

REGD. NO . D. L. (N ) 04/0007/200305 रजिस्ट्री सं० डी० एल० ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

नई दिल्ली , नवम्बर 23 नवम्बर 29 , 2008 , शनिवार /अग्रहायण 2- अग्रहायण 8 , 1930 सं. 48]

No. 48 NEW DELHI , NOVEMBER 23- NOVEMBER 29 , 2008, SATURDA YAGRAHAYANA 2- AGRAHAYANA 8. 1930 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके SeparatePaging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग [ 1 - खण्ड 3- उप- खण्ड (ii )

PART II Section 3-Sub- section ( li )

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry ofDefence)

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF कार्यालय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त , जयपुर

INCOME TAX JAIPUR जयपुर , 18 नवम्बर , 2008

Jaipur, the 18th November, 2008 सं. 11 /2008-09

No. 11 /2008-09

S.O. 3108. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause ( vi ) of clause (23C) of Section 10 ofthe Income- taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) read with rule 2CA ofthe Income- taxRules, 1962 the Chief Commissioner of Income- tax , Jaipur hereby approves "Sharda Vidya Mandir Prabandh Samiti, Jaipur" for the purpose of said section for the A.Y. 2005- 06& onwards .

का.आ, 3108.-आयकर नियम , 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 वां ) की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 सी ) की उप- धारा ( vi ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, जयपुर एतद्‌द्वारा निर्धारण वर्ष 2005-06 एवम् आगे के लिए कथित धारा के उद्देश्य से "शारदा विद्या मन्दिर प्रवन्ध समिति , जयपुर " को स्वीकृति देते हैं ।

Providedthat the society conformis to and complies with the provisions of sub-clause (vi) of clause (23C) of Section 10 ofthe Income- tax Act, 1961 read with rule 2CA ofthe Income-tax Rules, 1962 .

बशर्ते कि समिति आयकर नियम 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 के उपखण्ड (23 सी) की उप- धारा ( vi ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप कार्य करे ।

[No. CCIT/JPR/AddI . CIT ( Hars . )/ 10 (23C) ( vi )/2008-091 [क्रमांक: मुआआआआआ ( मुं. ) जय/ 10 (23 सी ) ( vi )/08-09 ]

B. S. DHILLON, Chief Commissioner of Income-tax बी. एस. ढिल्लों, मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त

4585 G1/08

(6199) Pri DIE PAZLIK OF INDIA NOBER 24.2008 AGRAILAYANA ? 19 : 2

:..

العدالة

NewDelhi , 2008

8.12.2110,

का.३४. ३:०० मंत्री दिनांक

152

of the Official Langhel Praposest Color) Reles, 170 The following shoes of Dendarahan (Minisuyot Informerskimmetho of the staff where: harurkeng knowledre ofHindi

1. Docidarshan

Darshan ! ...

3 Dar... 1 .

Doordars

ace. Chhatt

Ooordarsh

Ar nun etter .Badamathra,

Doordan :

red

the Loom coren is

Andheri

के अनुस्वण में

कात्री, 3111 , ni ***** ? શ્રછ સ્વ ? ???? ?? ????? ????? ???? ???? ?????????????*FF *

गायली प्रधकारी काम करता है ।

MINISTRY RAL AFE AIRS

New !

3. 31 日 charse on of ne Sechen 2 ofthe Dipt and tonsalar Officers ( t . ana Res) Act 19 hereby authorize Shin Koc the duties ofAssica Con alar from Labose of todia, Doba.

कार, श्री. 3112.

मुल्कः) आनिनाम के अं [भाः ।- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6201

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

(क) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद् द्वारा भारत का उच्चायोग , विक्टोरिया , माहे में श्री संजय कुमार सहायक को 27-10-2008 से सहायक कौंसलो अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[सं. टी -4330/1 /2006 ] आर के. पेरिदिया , अवर सचिव (कौंसुलर ) New Delhi, the 27th October, 2008

S.O. 3112. In pursuance of the clause ( ii) of time Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officer (Oaths and fees) Act , 1948 (41 of 1948 ), the Central Government hereby authorize Shri Sanjay Kumar Dey . Assistant to perform the duties of Assistant Consular Officer in the High Commission of India, Victoria, Mahe (Seychelles).

[No. Τ. 4330/1/2006] R. K. PERINDIA, Under Secy. (Consular) नई दिल्ली, 12 नवम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 3113.राजनयिक कौंसली अधिकारी ( शपथ एवं शुल्क) अधिनियम 1948 ( 1948 का 41 ) की धारा 2 के अंक ( क ) के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्‌द्वारा भारत का प्रधान कौंसलाबास, जांजीबार में श्री संजय कुमार , उच्च श्रेणी लिपिक से सहायक कौंसली अधिकारी का कार्य करने हेतु प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[सं. टी-4330/ 1/2006 ]

आर. के. पेरिदिया, अवर सचिव (कौन्सुलर ) New Delhi , the 12th November , 2008 S.O. 3113- In pursuance of the clause ( ii) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act , 1948 (41 of 1948 ) , the Central Governinent hereby authorize Shri Sanjay Kumar , UDC to perform the duties of Assistant Consular Officer in the Consulate General of India, Zanzibar .

[No. Τ.4330/1/2006] R. K. PERINDIA, Under Secy. (Consular)

वस्त्र मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 18 नवम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 3114.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों केकेप्रयोग के लिए) राजभाषा नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम 4 के अनुसरण में , वस्त्र मंत्रालय के अंतर्गत आने वाले निम्नलिखित कार्यालय को जिसमें 90 % से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्य- साधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है :

1. केंद्रीय मूगा एरी अनुसंधान एवं प्रशिक्षण संस्थान , केंद्रीय रेशम बोर्ड , वस्त्र मंत्रालय भारत सरकार , लाइदोईगढ़- 785 700 जोरहाट ( असम ) ।

2. बुनियादी बीज प्रगुणन एवं प्रशिक्षण केंद्र , बुनियादी तहर रेशमकीट घीज संगठन, केंद्रीय रेशम बोर्ड , पाल्लहडा- 159 119 जिला-अनगुल ( उड़ीसा ) ।

3. बुनियादी बीज प्रगुणन एवं प्रशिक्षण केंद्र , केंद्रीय रेशम बोर्ड, लक्ष्मी निवास , नौलखा मंदिर के सामने , पो. आश्रम करनीबाद, देवबर-814 112 ( झारखंड ) ।

4 आंचलिक कार्यालय, केंद्रीय रेशम प्रौद्योगिकी अनुसंधान संस्थान , केंद्रीय रेशम बोर्ड, दूसरा तल, सत्यम कामर्शियल कॉम्पलेक्स, लिंक रोड, बिलासपुर -495 001 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) ।

[सं. ई-11016/1 /2005 - हिन्दी] भूपेन्द्र सिंह, संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF TEXTILES NewDelhi , the 18th Novemвет , 2008 S.O. 3114. In pursuance of Sub - rule 4 of Rule 10 oftheOfficial Language (Use for official purposes ofthe Union ) , Rules, 1976 the Central Govemment hereby notifies the following office under the Ministry of Textiles , whereof more than 90% staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi :

1. Central Muga ari Research and Training Instituiç, Central Silk Board , Ministry of Textiles -Govt . of India, Laidoigadh -785 700 Jorhat (Assam) .

2 Basic Seed Multiplication and Training Centre, Basic Tasar Silkworm Seed organization, Pallahada- 759 119, Distt . Angul (Orissa).

3. Basic Seed Multiplication and Training Centre, Central Silk Board, Laxmi Newas, Informi of Naulakha Temple , Post-Assam Karnibaad , Devghar - 814112 ( Jharkhand) .

4. Regional Office, Central Silk Technology Research Institute, Central Silk Board, 2nd floor , Satyam Commercial Complex , Link Road, Bilaspur-495 001 (Chattisgarh).

[No. E-11016/1/2005 -Hinoil BHUPENDRA SINGH , Jt . Secy.

उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय ( उपभोक्ता मामले विभागं )

( भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो )

नई दिल्ली, 14 नवम्बर , 2008

का. आ. 3115.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक 6202

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29, 2008 /AGRAHΑΥΑΝΑ 8 , 1930

ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक (कों) में संशोधन किया गया है :-

अनुसूची

क्रम संशोधित भारतीय मानक संख्या की संख्या और वर्ष

[PART 11 -S

ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचिन करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों) में संशाधन किया गय किये गये हैं :

अनुसूची

संशोधन को संख्या और

संशाधन लागू होने की तिथि क्रम संशोधित भारतीय मानक संख्या (कों) की संख्या वर्ष

संशोधन लागू

होने की तिथि

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

( 1)

(2)

(4)

(3)

31 अक्तूबर .

आई एस 13365 ( भागा ) 1 अक्तूबर ,

1998

2008

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भत्रन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -1100002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा काचालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोत्रम्वतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदरावाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में विक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: सीईडी. राजग्न ए. के. सैनी, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी ) MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs) BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS New Delhi , the 14th November, 2008 S.O. 3115. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendment to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :--

SCHEDULE

Sl. No. and year of the No. Indian Standards

No, and year ofthe amend ment

औरशीर्षक

(3)

( 1)

(2)

(4) 1

।। नवम्बर आई एस 15111 ( भाग 1 ): 3 अक्टूबर ,

2008

2008 2002 सामान्य प्रकाश

व्यवस्थाओं के लिए स्वतः बालास्टकृत्त लैम्प प

सुरक्षा अपेक्षाएँ

इस भारतीय संशोधन को प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जभर नार्ग , नई दिल्ली 1100H ) 2 . क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली , कालकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुबनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , पटना , पूर्ण तथा तिरूश्रनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[ संदर्भ : ईटी-23 /टी -82 ] प्रकाश बचानी, वैज्ञा, ई. निदेशक ( विद्युत तकनीको विभाग ) New Delhi . the 14th November , 2008 ... 316. pursuance of clause ( b ) of sub - ruk ( 1 ) ofRule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rulca, 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby noufies that amendment to the Indian Standard , particulars of which are given in the Schedule herete annexed have been issued

SCHEDULE

St. No. No. and year of the Indían Standards

No , and year of the amend ment

shall have Date from which the amendment effect (1)

(3)

(4) (2)

Date from

which the

amendment

shall have

effect

(2)

(1 )

(3)

(4) 1 IS13365 (Part 1 ) :

31October .

1 October, 2008

1998

2008 Copy of this amendment is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards . Manak Bhavan . 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional ( Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur. Patna , Pune, Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: CED.Gazette] A.K. SAINI , Sc . ' F ' & Head ( Civil Engg. ) नई दिल्ली , 14 नवम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 3116.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप - नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीन्न मानक

3 October. 2008

11 Novembur. 2008 IS 15111 ( Part 1) . 2002 SelfBallasted Lamps for General Lighting Services: Part/Safety Requir

ments

Copies of this amendment are available with the Bureau of Indian Standarsis, Manak Bhavan . 9. Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Olliees NewDelhi , Kolkata Chandigarh . Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices Ahmedabad. Bangalore. Bhopal . Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore. Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna , Pune . Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: FT-23/T -82] PRAKASH BACHANI. Sc . F ( Director ) Electronις Departmem 6203 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 19 नवम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 3117 .--- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम, 1988 के विनियम ( 5 ) के उप - विनियम ( 6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतोय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तारीख से रद्द कर दिया गया है:

अनुसूची

रद्द करने की तिथि लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

लाइसेंस संख्या सीएम एल

लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/ प्रक्रम सम्बद्ध भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

27-8-2008 7486390

एल्युमीनियम कंडक्टर फार ओवरहेड ट्रांसमिशन परपस आईएस 398 पार्ट 4

सुयोग इलैक्ट्रिकल लिमिटेड ए-2, 2205 जी आईडी सी, हलोल, पंचमहल-389350

[संख्या सीएमडी-13:13 ]

पी. के. गम्भीर, उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर )

New Delhi , the 19th November, 2008

S.O. 3117. In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) ofthe regulation 5 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations , 1988 of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which are given below have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each:-

SCHEDULE

Article/Process with relevant Indian

Licences No. CM/L

Date of Cancellation Name and Address of the Licensee

SL No.

Standards covered by the licence cancelled

27-8-2008

Aluminium Conductors for overhead

7486390

transmission purpose IS398 (Part 4)

SuyogElectricals Ltd. A-2, 2205, GIDC, Halol Distt. Panchmahal -389350

[No. CMD/ 13 : 13 ]

P. K., GAMBHIR, Dy. Director General (Marks)

नई दिल्ली, 19 नवम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 3118, भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के नियम 4 के उप- विनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं, वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

अगस्त 2008 में स्वीकृत किये लाइसेंस

फर्म का नाम तथा पत्ता

उत्पाद का नाम तथा आई एस नंबर स्वीकृत करने की तिथि लाइसेंस संख्या

क्रम संख्या

(5)

(4)

(3)

(1 ) (2 )

08-08-2008 पदमावती डैकोर प्रा. लि.

1. 7861794

प्लाईवुड फार जनरल परपस आई एस 303 : 1989

प्लाट नंबर 47/48 , फेस 1 , जी आई डी सी वापी 396195 , वलसाद

22-08-2008 2. 7865705

पदमावती डैकोर प्रा. लि.

वीनस्ड डैकोरेटिव प्लाईवुद्ध

आई एस 1328 : 1996

प्लाट नंबर 47/48 , फेस 1 , जी आई डी सीवापी 396195 , वलसाद 6204

THE GAZETTL OF INDIA . NOVEMBER 29,2008 /AGRAHAYANASU

( PART 11 ---SIC St (3)

(4)

(1) (2)

3. 7860489

04-08-2008

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं क आभूषणों शिल्पकारी शुद्धनः एवं गुहरांकन आई एस 1417 : 1999

श्रीजो कृपा बैंगल वर्क शॉप नंदर 5 , पुनित शॉपिंग सेंटर बान्तजा रोड, सूरत

4. 7860590

אב-אם-04

स्वर्ग तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र अनुके आभूषणों शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहर्गकन आई एम 117 :

ओभज्वैलर्स, 11621 , सोनी की खादकी के सामन एम जी हवेली रोड , मानेक चोक अहमदाबाद

5. 7863293

12-08-200

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धात् आभूषणों शिल्पकारी शुद्धताक आई एस 1417 : 1900

बालकृष्णः ज्वैलर्स , डॉ गांधी रोड , एर तथा पी ओ, ताल्लुका हिम्मतनगर , सावरूबंग

6. 7804804

18-08-200

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्श्र धातुयों अभूत्रणों शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं महराकर आई एस 1417 : 1999

पितृछाया बैंगल वर्षी शाप नन्वर । पुनित शॉपिंग सेंटर, श्रशन्नाजी गर्ल्स स्कूल के सामनें, सूरत

7. 786670 ?

25-08-2008 के भोरचंद‌भाई गोल्ड पैलेस , 37-38 , सिटी वाईट मार्किट, स्टेशन रोड, पाउन भेहसाना

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं भुहरांकन आई एस 1417 : 1900

प्ानेकालान्त वी ज्वेलरम गामडीवाड़ के पास , सर्वोदय के सामन आनंद

स्त्राणं अथा स्वर्ण मित्र धातु वः आभूषणों शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहगकन आई एस 1417 : 1999

24-08-200 9. 7868010

पैकेजचंद पेयजल आई एस 14543 ; 2004

शहन्दीमार हैल्थ केयर इंडस्ट्रीज, बङ्गोगा रोड, लिलेसरा पावर स्टेशन के पीछ ध्ललेसरः , गोधरा, पंचमहन्न

10. 7867810

28-08-2008

स्वाईस फार फ्लोरोसेंट लैम्प आई एस 2215

संगम इलैक्ट्रिकल . ई ५. चिरन अपार्टमेंट , आजाद संघाकनी के सामने , अंबावाडी , अहमदाबाद -1

קסטל-אסאס 11. 786208 )

सवमसिंबल पम्पसैट आई एस 8034: 2002

डनक प्नास्टो टैक्निक प्रा. लिमि एन एच 14 , डीसा हाईने, होटल ग्रीन बृद्ध सागनं बदरापुरा, पाखनपुर नर गुजर

12. 78627k

12 OS 200

सबमर्सिबल पम्पसैट आई एस 8034 : 2002

अमरज्योत इंडस्ट्रीज , सर्व नंबर 2008/2 , एट तथा की आं मानवास , हलोल कलोल हाइवे रोड , कलोल

13. 7864703

18-08 2008

सबमर्सियल पम्पसैर आई एस 8034 : 2002

वर्धमान एम्य 212 , आशीर्वाद , फुट मार्किट नगदः राड, अहमदान्बाद

14. 786610 !

22 08 GUS

43 ग्रेड ओ पी सी आई एस 8112 : 1989

श्रीराम सिमेंट लिमिटेड , 3:15 , तोमरी मंजिल , सम्मान का सत्यप महन्थ के सामने , नाथपुर प्रग 6205 [भाग [1-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

(3)

(1) (2)

(4)

(5) 15. 7865503

21-08-2008

इलैक्ट्रिक मोनोसैट पम्प फार कलीयर कोल्ड वाटर फार एग्रीकलचरल तथा वाटर सप्लाई आई एस 9079 : 2002

साबर पम्प प्रा. लि. यूनिट 2, शिव शक्ति एस्टेट, खेमचंद दयालजी गोडाउन के पीछे , नेशनल हाईवे नंबर 8 , नारोल अहमदाबाद

16. 7864093

14-08-2008 पंकज इलैक्ट्रिकल ,

ओपलबैल सबमर्सिबल पम्पसैट आई एस 14220 : 1994

13/5, संकल्प एस्टेट , पन्ना एस्टेट रोड, बी ओ सी के पीछे , सोनी की चाल के पास , रखियाल अहमदाबाद

17. 7865196

19-08-2008

आई एस 14220: 1994 ओपलवैल सबमर्सिबल पम्पसैट

डिलाईट पम्प, 40 , तिरूपति एस्टेट , अंबर सिनेमा के पीछे , 'बापुनगर अहमदाबाद

18. 7867204

26-08-2008

जी आर पी पाईप जाएंट तथा फिटिंग फार सिवरेज , इंडस्ट्रियल वेस्ट तथा वाटर

बालाजी फाइबर रैनिफोर्स प्रा. लि. सर्वे नंबर 293-1 और 2 , सकारदा , भादरवा रोड, पोचा क्रासिंग के पास गाँव पोचा खंडी आई एस 14402 : 1996

19. 7862695

12-08-2008

पैकेजबंद पेयजल आई एस 14543 : 2004

सकेत बिवरेज , महालक्ष्मी मंदिर के सामने , नाडा रोड, शाहेरा , पंचमहल

20. 786.3394

13-08-2008

पैकेजबंद पेयजल आई एस 14543: 2004

शक्ति बिवरेज , 168, कृष्ण एस्टेट, कोहिनूद फ्लोर मिल के पास में , गोरवा वडोदरा

21. 7866909

26-08-2008

पैकेजबंद पेयजल आई एस 14543 : 2004

एल एस बिवरेज इंडस्ट्रीज 39 महागुजरात इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, रिलायेंस पेट्रोल पम्प के पास , गाँव मोरिया , चांगोदर , ता. सानंद , अहमदाबाद

22. 7867002

26-08-2008

पैकेजबंद पेयजल आई एस 14543 : 2004

भूमिबिवरेज , भाग्योदय होटल बिल्डिंग, सरखेज सानंद हाइवे , अहमदाबाद

23. 7867608

27-08-2008

पैकेजबंद पेयजल आई एस 14543 : 2004

डिलक्सबिवरेज , जलाय मंदिर गामडी रोड के पास , दाहोद-389170

24. 7868105

29-08-2008

पैकेजबंद पेयजल आई एस 14543 2004

फ्रेश पैकेजड ड्रिंकिंग वाटर ब्राह्मण फालिया , गुजराती स्कूल के पीछे , दिनडोली उधना

25. 7868206

29-08-2008

पैकेजबंद पेयजल आई एस 14543 : 2004

पैसिफिक फिनस्टाक लिमिटेड, ५ वीं मंजिल , गालव चैम्बर्स, सरदार स्टैचू के पास , सयाजीगंज , वडोदरा

26. 7868408

पैकेजबंद पेयजल

29-08-2008

आई एस 14543 : 2004

सनराईस बिवरेज तथा फूड , 17-18 , सम्राट इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, रेलवे क्रासिंग के पास , गोदादरा दिनडोली रोड. सूरत

[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ] 6206

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29 , 2008 /AGRAHAYANA 8.1930 [ PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 19th November, 2008

S.O. 3118. In pursuance of sub -regulation ( 5 ) of the regulation 4 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulations 1988 , of the Bureau of indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Granted licences for the month ofAugust 2008 S. No. LicenceNo. Name of the firm and address 1

7861794

Padmavati Decor Pvt Ltd, Plot No 47/48 Phase- 1GIDC Vapi 396195, Valsad

7865705

Padmavati Decor Pvt Ltd. Plot No 47/48 Phase- 1 GIDC Vapi 396195, Valsad

7860489

Shreeji Krupa Bangles Works Shop No 5 Punit Shopping Centre Balaji Road Sural

7860590

Aum Jewellers 1162/1 , Opp Soni Ni Khadki , MG Haveli Road , Manek Chowk, Ahmedabad

7863293

Balkrushna Jewellers Dr. Gandhi Road, At& Po , Taluka Himatnagar Dist Sabarkantha

7864804

Pitruchhaya Bangle Works Shop No.1 , Punit Shopping Centre. Opp . Balaji Girls School Surat 7

7866707

K. Virchandbhai Gold Palace 37-38, City PointMarket , Station Raod, Patun Mehsana

7866808

Maneklal V. Fewels Near Camdivad, Opp . Sarvoday Anand 9

7868610

Shalimar Health Care Industries Baroda Road Behind Lilesra Power Station Lilesra

Godhra Dist Panchmahals 10

7867810

Sangam Electricals E/9, Birju Apartments, Opp . Azad Society . Ambawadi , Ahmedabad 15

Date of Cirant ISNumber & Product

8-8-2008 Plywoodfor General Purposes IS303: 1989

22-8-2008 Veneered Decorative Plywood 1S1328: 1996

4-8-2008 GoldandGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts -Fineness and Marking IS1417:1999

+ 8-2008 Gold and Gold Alloys . Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking IS1417:1999

12-8-2008 Gold and Gold Alloys . Jewellery/ Artefacts -Fineness andMarking IS 1417:1999

18-8-2008 Gold and Gold Alloys . Jewellery/Artefacts -Fineness and Marking IS 1417:1999

25-8-2008 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness andMarking IS 1417:1999

25-8-2008 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery Artefacts-Fineness andMarking IS1417:1999

29-8-2008 Packaged Drinking Water IS14543: 2004

28-8-2008 Starters for Fluorescent Lamps IS2215:2006 6207

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008 /अग्रहायण ४ , 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) )

]

7862089

Duke Plasto Technique Pvt . Ltd. , N. H. 14 Deesa High Way, Opp. Hotel Green Wood, Badarpura , Palanpur (N.Gujarat)

7862796

Amarjyot Industries Survey No. 208/2 , At & PO Madhwas, Halol -Kalot Highway Road, Tal-Kalol

7864703

Vardhman Pumps 212Ashirwad Estate Opp FruitMarket NarodaRoad, Ahmedabad

14 7866101

Shriram Cement Limited 305 Third Floor Samaan Complex, Opp SatyamMall Jodhpur Premchandnagar Raod Satellite, Ahmedabad

7865503

Sabar Pumps Pvt . Ltd. (Unit 2), Shiv Shakti Estate Behind Khemchand Dayaljee S Godown NationalHighway No. 8 Naroi , Ahmedabad

16 7864093

Pankaj Electricals 13/5 Sankalp Estate Panna Estate Road B/HBOLNear Soni Chal Rakhial Ahmedabad

7865196

DelitePumps 40, Tirupati Estate,B /H, Amber Cinema, Bapunagar 7867204

Balaji Fibre Reinforce Pvt . Ltd. SurveyNo. 293-1 &2 , Sakarda Bhadarva Road, Near PoichaCrossing, Village Poicha(Khandi )

7862695

Sanket Beverages Opp Mahalaxmi Temple, NadaRoad, Shahera Panchmahal 20

7863394

Shakti Beverages 168, Krishna Estate, Beside Kohinoor Floor Mill , GorwaVadodara

7866909

LS Beverages Industries 39, MahaGujarat Industrial Estate, NR Relience Petrol Pump, VillageMoriya Changodar, Tal Sanand, Dist Ahmedabad 7867002

Bhoomi Beverages Bhagyoday Hotel Building Sarkhej Sanand Highway, Ta Ahmedabad .

4585 G1/08-2

8-8-2008 Submersible Pumpsets IS8034:2002

12-8-2008 Submersible Pumpsets IS8034:2002

18-8-2008 Submersible Pumpsets IS8034:2002

22-8-2008 43 grade ordinary Portland cement 158112: 1989

21-8-2008 Electric Monoset Pumps for Clear, Cold Water for Agricultural and Water Supply Purposes IS9079:2002

14-8-2008 Openwell Submersible Pumpsets IS14220: 1994

19-8-2008 Openwell Submersible Pumpsets IS 14220:1994

26-8-2008 GRP pipesjoints and fittings for sewerage, industrial waste and water (other than potable) IS 14402:1996

12-8-2008 Packaged Drinking Water IS14543:2004

13-8-200% Packaged Drinking Water IS14543:2004

26-8-2008 Packaged Drinking Water IS14543:2004

26-8-2008 PackagedDrinking Water IS14543,2004 6208

TIO GAZETTE OF INDIA. NOVEMBER 29. 2008 / AGRAHAYANA 8. 1930 [ PART 1E - Stc .3 1

7867608

DeluxBeverages

27-8-2008

Packaged Drinking Water [ S14543:20804

NR Jalai Mandir Gamdi B Dahod 389170

7868105

29-8-2008 Fresh Packaged Drinking Water

Brahmin Fatra Bebund

Packaged DrinkingWater IS14543.20K二

Gujarati School Dindo na

Pacific insch

29-8-2008

Packaged Drinking Water IS 14543:2004

9 Floor Galay Cingu Near Sardar Stam

Sayajigunj Vadodara

7868408

20-8-2008 Sunrise Beverages

Packaged Drinking Water IS 14543 :2001

17-18 Samrat industriitic .

NearRailway Crossing.

Godadara -Dindoli ke

[No.CMD 13:11 ]

P. K. GAMBUk . Dy Director General Marks )

नन् ' दल्ली, 20 नवम्बर , 2008

का, आ. 3119. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो प्रमनियम 1988 के विनियम 5 के उपनि' नयम के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण बाल 26-7-20xx 저 उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तारीख से कर दिया गया है 25-8-200108

अधिसूची

लाइसंसधारी का नाम व पन

रद्द करने की तिथि क्रम संख्या

लाइभस संख्या

लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु प्रक्रम सम्बद्ध भारती मानक पर प्रशीर्षक

और आर विन्डक्स

5-8-2008

भा. मा. 4246 :2002

गाला न. ३ अॅन्ड ए

सिंगल , डबल, त्रिमल

औरफोर बर्नर

त्रॉल, चंदरपाकडी गंड

म्टेनलेस स्टील बांटो

कांदिवली पारेचम, मुंबई

के साथ ब्रास कॅप .

सी आय चर्नर , एल पी जी

के साथ प्रयोग हेतु चरेस

गैस स्टोव

[सोएमडी.13:13 |

पी , जं, गम्भीर , उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर ) No de 20th November, 2008

S.O. 3119. In pursuance of sub-regtomic of regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification ) Regulations 1988. de Bareas of Indian Sandas treey notifies that the licences particulars of which are given in the following schednie have been cancelled wah eftove trom the date indicated against vol .

SCHEDULE.

ene . Na

S. No.

hame and address otteensee

Article/Process with relevant

Date of

Cancellation

Indian Standard covered by the licence cancelied

114048

KR Windals

IS4246: 2002

5-8-2008 Gala No. 3& A- 10. la song

Chenel . Bandarpakadi

Single . Doubie. Triple and

Koad, Dhanukar Wad : vali (W ) Four Burner Stainless

Mumbai -400067

Steel Body with Brass Cap .

GreuerBumli

C[ Burner

Kandivali West

Maharashtra 07

No CMD : 13

PK . GAMBAR. Dr. Director General ( Markst 6209

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 20 नवम्बर , 2008

का,आ, 3120.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो प्रमाणन विनियम 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप - विनियम 5 के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत्तद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे दिए गए हैं, ने स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं:- 26-7-2008 से 25-8-2008

अधिसूची

उत्पाद

भा. मा. सं.

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

लागूतिथि

लाइसेंस संख्या

क्रम संख्या

3 2

18-08-2009 7865095

1 .

वीर इंजिनीयरिंग अॅन्ड अप्लायन्सेस , पहला माला , रोड नं. 3 . सिंग इस्टेट , ठाकुर विलेज, कांदिवली ( १) , मुंबई -400101

17-08-2009 2

7864396

29-07-2011 3.

7860994

कावेरीज्वेलर्स, 7 , साई- धाम निवास, यशोधाम नगर के नजदीक , बस स्थानक , लोकमान्य नगर नं. 2 , ठाणे- 400606

12-08-2011 7863802

प्रकाश जवेरी ए-66 , बिग- स्प्लॅश , सेक्टर 17 , वाशी , नवी मुबई 400705 7863192 3-08-2011 5.

मंगलमणी ज्वेलर्स , शॉप नं. 9, भैरव कृपा बिल्डिंग , लक्ष्मी मार्केट के सामने, एन जी आचार्य मार्ग , स्टेशन रोड, चेंबूर, मुंबई-400071

24-08-2011 7866606

नवकार ज्वेलर्स, शॉप नं. ४ , ठाकुर आर्केड , विवा सुपर मार्केट , वसई विकास बैंक, विरार ( पश्चिम ) , ठाणे401303 7.

10/08/2009 7862392

वेस्टकोएस्ट इनगॉट्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड , प्लॉट नं. । , कुदैम इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, कुदैम, उत्तर गोत्रा 403115

भाग/अनु/वर्ष 4

भा. मा.

4246:2002 एल पी जी के साथ प्रयोग हेतू घरेलू गैस स्टोव

भा. मा.

सामान्य संरचना इस्पात

2830:1992

रुक्मिणीरामा स्टोल रोलिंग्स, (मेल्टिंग डिव्हीजन) , प्लॉट नं. एल -17 , कनकोलिम इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , कनकोलिम, सालसेट , गोवा-403703 ,

में पुनर्वेल्लन के लिए कार्बन ढलवाँ इस्पात , बिलेट , इंगट बिलेट, ब्लूम और स्लैब की विशिष्टी

भा. मा.

स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र

1417:1999 धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन

भा. मा.

स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र

1417:1999 धातुओं के आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धत्ता व मुहरांकन

भा. मा.

1417: 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन

स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र भा. मा.

1417 :1999 धातुओं के

आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन

भा. मा.

सामान्य संरचना

2830: 1992 इस्पात में पुनर्वेल्लन के लिए कार्बन ढलवाँ इस्पात , बिलेट, इंगट बिलेट, ब्यूम और स्लैब की विशिष्टी 6210 FR GAZETTE OF INDIA NOVEMBER 29 , 2008 AGRAJIAYANA 8.1930

24/08/2009

क्र्वाट्न मंलग्न इंडस्ट्रीज , (ए हिविता बैंक बलवीर मेटल्लू अॅन्ट वर प्रा. लि. ) , एस . स्गयलौ गाँव , सिल्वामा, दी और नगर हवेली - 396230

7864295 12/08/2011 9.

शा. ज्वन लुम्बाजी ओसवाल , 1999 ए , बाजारचंड , रत्नागिरी , चिपातुन 1156015

28 :107/2011 10.

ज्वेलरत्रों, 330 , पुरषोतम विला, 339 , पुरषोत्तम विला , सातवाँ रोड, खार, मुंबर-400052

7864497 13/08/2011

इकाल अंडवाईजर लिमिटेड , चौदहवाँ माला, एक्सप्रेस टॉवर , नरीमन पॉइंट, मुंबई -400021

12.

7801188 03 - US/ 2011

आर र्ड बँगल प्रा.लि. , यूनिट नं. 252 ए -जेड इंडिस्ट्रयल इस्टेट , जो के मर्ण नां परेल , मुंबई 40000 762010 10: (08/2009 13.

मादित हरगपयान निमिटेड , प्लॉट नं 14.

24.08-2009

गट नं. 352 अंक भारत फर्टिलायजानंद, बागुल खेरवाडी , तालुका वाडा, दाणं 7850681

15.

31107 2011

अनमोल विमला फूलोर हा नं. आय.आय.टी. नौग्न, मेन गेट, गवई, चई -400076

7861289 03 08:20 : 1

आर्या गरुड़ 20 सवल इस्टेट , मिलकर लोअर परेल .

17 .

7864501

300 2001

बी.? 18 .

[ PART I S. 3 ) ] 4

भा. मा.

2062: 1999 साप्यन्य सरचना प्रयांजनों के लिए इम्यात- विशिष्टि

भा, मा.

1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र श्रानुभों के आभूषण शिल्पकारी शुद्धता व ہادری با بالاسے

भा. मा.

1417: 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र श्रानुओं के आभूषणः शिल्पकारी शुद्धना

भा. मा. 1417 : 1994 स्वतं और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणः शिल्पकारी शुद्धता च मूहरांकन

भा. मा.

वागणं और स्वर्ण मिश्न धातुओं के आभूषण शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन

भा. मा. 2830 : בעין सामान्य संरचन! डाल में पुनर्वल्लन कलये कर्जन ढलना हरमट, भिन्नट , इंगट चिनंद, ब्लग और स्नैच يطلعلية

भा.. मा .

2062 リリ

भा. मा.

1113 : 1990 यान के आभूषणः शिवकाने शद्धना व

गा . भा.

रिना - शुद्धना व

1417 : 1999 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29 , 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[ भाग 1 ] - खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

4 1

10-08-2011

18. 7863091

कोहिनूरज्वेलर्स , 7 , सुकुमार कॉर्नर, दाऊद बाग , 127 जे.पी. रोड , अंधेरी (पश्चिम) , मुंबई-400058

29-07-2011

19. 7859508

एस.जी. बाफना ज्वेलर्स प्रा.लि., 275 , बाजारपेठ पोलिस स्टेशन , भिवंडी, ठाणे 400058 7859104

28-07-2011

डो-निलएक्सपोर्ट अॅन्ड इम्पोर्ट, 502 , रिगल , एस व्ही रोड, सांताक्रुज पश्चिम , मुंबई-400054

12-08-2011

21 .

7864905

एडबेन्चर ज्वेलर्स , सुप्रिय मार्केट , किलवानी रोड, सिल्वासा , दादरा अॅन्ड नगर हवेली-396230

7864602

22.

13-08-2011 ऑल्विनज्वेलर्स , 307 , गोल्डन प्लाजा, 93/95 , धानजी स्ट्रिट, मुंबई-400003 7860691 31-07-2011

23.

जाधव ज्वेलर्स, शॉप नं. जी./37 , नेहरु नगर, बर्वे रोड , कुर्ला पूर्व , मुंबई-400024

21-07-2011

7858708

24.

हितेश ज्वेलर्स , 7/9 , डी डी प्लाजा , तीसरा अगियारी लेन, 103/105 , प्रथम तल , जावेरी बाजार , ग्रेटर बाम्बे , महाराष्ट्र400003

6211

भा. मा.

1417:1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन

भाया.

1417: 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन

भा. मा.

1417: 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन

भा. मा.

1417: 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणः शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन

भा. मा.

1417: 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण। शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन

भा. मा.

1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता व मुहरांकन

भा. मा.

1417 : 1999 स्वर्ण और स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता व मुहरांकन

[सं. सी एम डी/13 : 11 ] पी. के. गम्भीर , उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर )

New Delhi , the 20th November, 2008

S.O. 3120-In pursuance of sub - regulation (5 ) of Regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations, 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given below in the following schedule: (26 July, 2008 to 25 August, 2008)

SCHEDULE Licence

IS No./Part Product

Name and Address (factory)

Validity

No.

Date

No.

ofthe Party

18-8-2009

7865095

Veer Engineering & Appliances , 1stFloor, Road No. 3, Singh Estate, Thakur Village, Kandivali (E) , GreaterBombay, Mumbai , Maharashtra-400101

Sec/Year 5

IS4246:

Domestic Gas Stoves for usewith Liquefied 2002 Petroleum Gases- Specification 6212

[ PAR : 11 Sic. 3fii THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29 , 2008 /AGRAHAYANA 8. 1930

4 2

7864396 17-8-2009

Rukminirama Steel Rollings Pvt. l.td.. (Melting Division. ) Plot No. L- 17 , Cuncolim Indl , Estate . Cunçolim , Salcete . GOA-403703 North Goa SALCETE Goa -403703 .

786091 29-7-2011

Kaveri Jewellers , 7, Sai - Dham Niwas .Near Yashodhan Nagar Bus Stop, Lokmanya Nagar No. 2 , Thane,Maharashtra -400606

7863802 12-8-2011

Prakash Zaveri . A-66.Big- Splasia, Sector 17, Vashi , Navi Mumbai Thane , Navi Mumbai Maharashtra -400705 5

7863192 3-8-2011

Mangal Mani lewellers . Shop No. 9 , Inside Bhairav Kripa Bldg. , Opp . Laxmi Market. , NG Acharya Mary , Station Road , Greater Bombay. Chembur, Maharashtra -400071 6

7866606 24-8-2011

Navkar Jewellers , Shop No. 8 , Thakur Arcade, Viva Super Market , Opp. Vasai Vikas Bank, Thane Virur (W) Manarashtra - 101303 7

7862392 10-08-2009

West Coast Ingots PrivateLimited, Plot No. 1 , Kandaim Industrial Estate, Kundaim , GOA - 403115 North Goa, Kundaim Goa Marking -403115

7866404 24-08-2009

Quartz Metal Industries , (ADivision of Balbir Metals & Power Pvt . 1.tdi. S No 263/2/8 Village Sayli , Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Silvassa Dadra and Nagar Haveli 396230 9.

7864295 12-08-2011

Sha Jawanmal [ umbaji Oswal , 1999 , Bazaepeth Ratnagiri Chiplun Maharashtra 415605

10.

7859306 28-07-2011

Jeweleravi , 339, Purshottam Villa , 7th Road, Greater Bombay Khar ( W) , Maharashtra -400052 IL .

7864497 13-08-2011

ECAI , Advisors Limited, 14th Floor , Express Towers, Nariman Point. Creater Bombay, Mumbai , Maharashtra -400021

IS 2830: 1992 Carbon steel cast billet ingots, billets . blooms and stabs for re-rolling into steel for general structural purposes

Gold and Gold Alloys, IS: 1417 Jewellery Artefacts- 1999 Fineness and Marking- Specification

Gold and Gold Alloys , IS 1417 Jewellery Artefacts- Fineness atal Marking- Specilication 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys, IS: 1417 JewelleryArtefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification 1999 Gold andGold Alloys , IS . 1417 Jewellers Artefacts- Fineness and Marking---Specification 1999

IS: 2830 1992 Carbon steel cast billet ingots , billets , blooms and słabs forre-rolling into steel for general structural purposes

IS:2062

1990 Steel for General, Structural Purposes- Specification

Gold and Gold Alloys. 15 : 1-417 Jewellery Artefacts- 1990 Fineness and Marking- Specilication

Gold and Gold Alloys . IS : 1417 Jewellery Artefacts 1999 Fineness and Marking- Specification

Gold and GoldAlloys . IS : 1417 JewelleryArtefacts 1999 Fineness and Marking- Specification [ भाग 1] - खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

4 2

12.

03-08-2011

7861188

R.G. Bangle Pvt . Ltd. , Unit No. 252, A-Z Industrial Estate, G.K. Marg, Lowerparel ,Greater Bombay , Mumbai,Maharashtra -400013

13. 7862291 10-08-2009

Mohit Ispat Limited , Plot No.339/340 Kundaim Indl . Estate, Kundaim . Ponda , GOA . North Goa, Kundaim , Ponda, Goa-403115 14, 7866303 24-08-2009

Shree Vaishnav Ispat Pvt . Ltd. , gutNo. 352, off Bharat Fertilizer Road, Bagul Kharewali , Thane Tal wada Maharashtra 15. 7859609 31-07-2011

Anmol Jewellers, 3, Vimla Sadan Chawl, Opp . Phulora Hsg. Soc. , IIT Main gate, Powai . Greater Bombay , Mumbai , Maharashtra-400076

03-08-2011

16. 7861289

AryaGold, 209, Parvati Indi. Estate, Sunmill Compound, Lower Parel . Greater Bombay, Mumbai , Maharashtra-400013 17.

7864501 13-08-2011

S.M. Jewellers B/2, Sector 15 , 13/18 , Bldg. No. 8, RoadNo. 4Vashi , Thane Navi Mumbai , Maharashtra-400703 18.

7863091 10-08-2011

Kohinoor Jewellers , 7, Sukumar Corner , Dawood Baug, 127 J.P. Road, Andheri (W) , Greater Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra-400058 19.

29-07-2011

7859508

S.G. Bafna Jewellers Pvt . Ltd. , 275, Bazarpeth, Opp .Bazarpeth Police, Station Thane, Bhiwandi , Maharashtra-421302 7859104 28-07-2011

20.

Do-Nil Export and Insport 502, Regal , S.V. Road, Santacruz (W), Greater Bombay, Maharashtra-400054 21 .

7864905 12-08-2011

Adventure Jewellers SupremeMarket, Kilwani Road , Silvassa Dadra and Nagar Haveli Silvassa, Dadra and Nagar Haveli- 396230 22. 7864602 13-08-2011

Allwin Jewellers, 307, Golden Plaza, 93/95, Dhanji Street, Greater Bombay. Mumbai , Maharashtra -400003

6213

Gold and Gold Alloys, IS: 1417 Jewellery/Artefacts 1999 Fineness and Marking Specification

Carbon steel cast billet ingots, billets , blooms and slabs for re - rolling into steel for general structural pur- poses IS 2830: 1992

Steel for General IS2062: Structural Purposes- 1999 Specification

Gold and Gold Alloys, IS 1417: Jewellery/Artefacts Fineness and Marking- Specification 1999

Gold and Gold Alloys , IS 1417: Jewellery/Artefacts Fineness and Marking Specification 1999

Gold andGold Alloys , IS: 1417 Jewellery/Artefacts Fineness and Marking- Specification 1999

GoldandGold Alloys , IS: 1417 Jewellery/Artefacts Fineness and Marking- Specification 1999

Goldand Gold Alloys , IS: 1417 Jewellery/Artefacts- 1999 Fineness and Marking- Specification

Goldand Gold Alloys . ] S: 1417 Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking- Specification 1999

GoldandGoldAlloys , 15: 1417 . Jewellery /Artefacts- 1999 Fineness and Marking- Specification 6214 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29, 2008 /AGRAHAYANA 8 , 1930

7860691

23 .

31-07-2011

Jadhav Jewellers , Shop No. G.37 , Nehru Nagar , Barve Road, Kurla(F), Greater Bombay, Mumbai Maharashtra - 100024 24. 7858708 21-07-2011

Hitesh Jeweliers

7/9 , DD Plaza . 3rd Agiyari Lane, 103/105 1st Floor. Zaveri Bazar, Greater Bombay , Maharashtra -400003

PART 11-Ser. 3 ( ⅲ)

...

6 Gold and Gold Alloys , IS: 1417 Jewellery/Artefacts- 1999 Fineness and Marking-

Speciticezion

Gold and GoldAoys, IS.1417 Jewellery:Anefacts

Fineness am Mark

Specall

No.CMD P.K. GAM Genc

नई दिल्ली , 20 नवम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 3121. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( १ ) के ईद में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरा एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मागनकों) में संशोधन किया गया किय

अनुमधी

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

क्रम संख्या

संशोधित भारतीय पानक की संख्या और वर्ष

( 1)

(2)

(3) 1 आई एस 4326 :

संशोधन लागू होने

(4)

संशोधन संख्या 4. अक्तूबर, 2008

1993

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो गा नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़, नेन्नई, मुम्बई कथाएगा। जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना, पुणे तथा तिम्

31 अक्तूबर 2008 पुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : पदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदरावाद, रंतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[ संदर्भ : सोईडी राजपत्र ए. के. सैनी , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी )

New Delhi , the 20th November, 2008

$.0, 3121 -In pursuance of clause ( b) of sub-rule ( 1 ) of of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987. the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendment to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the amendment

SL No.

No. and year of the Indian Standards

(1)

(2)

(3) 1

154326 :1993

Date froin which the amendmem shall have effect

(4)

31 October 2008

Amendment No. 4, October2008

Copy of this amendment is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manal Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata Chandigarh. Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad. Bangalore . Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune. Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: CED Gazetel A. K. SAINI . Sc . F & Head ( Civil Engg . ) [ भाग [1- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

6215

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8, 1930

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर,, 2008

का. आ. 3122.- केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी , भारत के राजपत्र, तारीख 08-02-2008 से प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का आ. संख्या 255 तारीख 09-02-2008 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से उपांबद् अनुसूची मंडल- पालसमुद्रम, जिला- चित्तूर, राज्य आन्ध्रप्रदेश मे चेन्नै पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मनाली कि रिफैनेरी से देवनणुट्टि टर्मिनल, बैंगलुर तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रत्तियां ता. 20-05-2008 को जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिर्पोट दे दीहै:

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्द्व अनुसूचि में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्व अनुसूचि मे विनिर्दष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की तारीख से इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड निहित होगा ।

मंडल : पालसमुद्रम

अनुसूची

राज्य: आन्ध्रप्रदेश

जिला : चित्तूर

गाँवकानाम

सर्वेक्षण स- खण्डसं.

111 47, श्रीकावेरिराजुपुरम

111

76 48, पालसमुद्रम

185 49, बैंगलराजुकुप्पम

148

265 50, अमुदला

251

98 51 , अमिदुला पुत्तुर

103 4585 G1/08-3

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड सं .

वर्ग मिटर हेक्टर एयर

83 15

8888

[फा. सं. आर-25011/5/2007 - ओ.आर. - 1 ]

एस. के. चिटकारा, अवर सचिव 6216

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29, 2008 /AGRAHAYANA 8, 1930

[ PAR : II-SC 3 ( ii ) ] Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas

New Delhi , the 11th November, 2008

S. 0. 3122.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India . Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas . S.G.No. 255 dated 09-02-2008 under sub section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 ( 501362 ) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of tiser in the land specified in the schedule relating to Mandal Palasamudram , Dist . hoor , State Andhra pradesh , annexed to that notification for the purpose of layung pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Refinery of Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited , manali to Devanguthi Terminal , Bangalore , by ine Indian Oil Corporation Limited .

And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette Notification were made available to the general public on date of 20-05-2008;

And whereas the Competent Autronty has under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government:

And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquirexi .

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of the section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the Right ofUser in the land specified in !! Schedule annexed to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline

And further in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 4 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby direct that the Right of User in the said land shall instead of vesting of publication of this declaratie: encumbrances . the Central Government , vests from the date the Indian oil corporation limited free from all

SCHEDULE

mandal: Palasamudram

State: Andhra Pradesh

Data: Chittoor

Area

Sub -Division No.

Name of the Village

Are

Hocin

Sq Mtr .

1: 1

47, SRIKAVERIRAJUPURAM

(0)

48, PALASAMUDRAM

196

49, VENGALRAJUKUPPAM

265

50 , AMUDALA

25:

51 , AMIDULA PUTTUR

[F. No. R -25011 / 5 /2007-0.R. - 11

S.K. CHITKARA . Under Secy.

6217

भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर,, 2008

का. आ. 3123.-केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी , भारत के राजपत्र, तारीख 08-02-2008 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का आ. संख्या 256 तारीख 09-02-2008 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्व अनुसूची मंडल कित्तूर, जिला- चित्तूर, राज्य आन्ध्रप्रदेश मे चेन्नै पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरशन लिमिटेड, मनाली कि रिफैनेरी से देवनगुट्टि टर्मिनलं , बैंगलुर तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां ता. 20-05-2008 को जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ,

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिर्पोट दे दीहै;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्व अनुसूचि में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्द्व अनुसूचि मे विनिर्दष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्तहोकर प्रकाशन की तारीख से इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची राज्य: आन्ध्रप्रदेश

जिला: चित्तूर

मंडल: चित्तूर

सर्वक्षण स-

उप-खण्ड सं .

गाँव का नाम

खण्डसं.

212

2A 55, अनंतपुरम

177

112

114

115

5D 57, तालांबेडु

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मिटर एयर

हेक्टर

02 00

00 6218

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVUMBER 29 , 2008 / AGRAHAYAN

[P11-S!

ム

62 57, तालाबड

58, चिंतलगुंटा

257

60 , गारिगापल्लि

153

61. अनुत्पल्ले

[ फा. सं. 25311 / 5 /2007 - ओ.आर.-

एम. के . चिटकारा , अवर सत्रि New Delhi , the 11th November, 2008

S. O. 3123.-Whereas by the notification of the Government of India . Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas . S.O.No. 256 dated 09-02-2008 under sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land specified in the schedule relating to Mandal Chittoor , Dist . Chittoor State Andhra pradesh , annexed to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Productfrom Refinery of Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited , manali to Devanguthi Terminal , Bangalore , by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette Notification were made available to the general public on date of 20-05-2008;

And whereas the Competent Authority has under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government ;

And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that Right of User in the land specified in the Scheduto appended to this notification should be acquired .

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub - section ( 1 ) of the section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule annexed to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline .

And further in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 4 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby direct that the Right of User in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vests from the date of publication of this declaration in the Indian oil corporation limited free from all encumbrances .

6219 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8, 1930

SCHEDULE

State : Andhra Pradesh

District : Chittoor

Mandal : Chittoor

Area

Sub -Division No.

SurveyNo.

Name of the Village

Afe

Hectare

Sq . Mtr.

212

55, ANANTAPURAM

177

112

114

115

81 57, THALAMBEDU

58 , CHINTALAGUNTA

257

60, NARIGAPALLE

153

61 , ANUPPALLE

F. No. R- 25011/5/2007-O.R. -I ]

S. K. CHITKARA, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर,, 2008

का. आ. 3124.-केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी, भारत के राजपत्र , तारीख 08-02-2008 मे प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृक्तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का आ. संख्या 257 तारीख 09-02-2008 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्द्व अनुसूची मंडल- गंगावरम, जिला- कित्तूर, राज्य आन्ध्रप्रदेश मे चेन्नै पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मनाली कि रिफैनेरी से देवनगुद्धि टर्मिनल, बैंगलुर तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरशन लिमिटेड, द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणाकी थी;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां ता. 20-05-2008 को जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा (1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिर्पोट दे दीहै;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूचि में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए:

6220

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA NOVEMBER 29,2008 / AGRAHAYANA 8,192 )

PART II-SLC. 3 ( ii ) ) अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ग अनुसूचि पे विनिर्दष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की तारीख से इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड निहित होगा ।

मंडल : गंगावरम

अनुसूची

राज्य : आन्ध्रप्रदेश

जिला: चित्तूर

गाँव का नाम

सवेक्षण स- खण्ड सं.

2 74, गंगाबरग

751

753

131 75. मारहुल्लि

129 76. इंटपल्ले

300

G01 78 , पाशगु

523

533

41 79, पादिकांडा

621

1 ::

80.कोलायत

117

او

क्षेत्रफल

उप-खण्ड सं .

हेक्टर एयर वर्गमिटर 3

43 3A

32 3

05 7A

81 3

02 18

48 2

62 4

62 1

10 2B

21 3

20 1

48 1A

96 1

62 3

07 4

02 [फा, सं . आर-2501 / 5 /2007 ओ.आर.1 ]

एन्न. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 11th November, 2008

5. 0. 3124. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India . Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas . S.O.No. 257 dated 09-02-2008 tinder sub section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land specified in the schedule relating to Mandal Gangavaram , Dist . Chittoor , State Andhra pradesh , annexed to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Refinery of Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited , manali to Devanguihi Terminal , Bangalore , by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited .

And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette Notification were made available to

2005-2008;

the general public on date of -खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारव का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29 , 2008 / अग्रहायण 8, 1930

6221 And whereas the Competent Authority has under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government;

And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired.

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of the section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule annexed to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline .

And further in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby direct that the Right of User in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vests from the date ofpublication of this declaration in the Indian oil corporation limited free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

State:Andhra Pradesh

District : Chittoor

Mandal :Gangavaram

Sub - Division No.

Survey No.

Name of the Village

761

74, GANGAVARAM

739

769

131

7A 75, MAREDUPALLI

129

806

1B 76, DANDAPALLE

661

2 78, MAMADUGU

661

523

421

3 79, PATHIKONDA

421

312

150

117

3 80 , KEELAPALLI

Area Are Sq. Mtr.

Hectare

1888 00 00

[F. No. R- 25011/5/2007-0.R. - I ) S. K. CHITKARA, Under Secy.

6222

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29, 2008/AGRAHAYANA 8 , 1930

[PART U- STX. 3 ( i ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर,, 2008

का. आ. 3125.-केन्द्रीय सरफार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी, भारत के राजपत्र, तारीख 08-02-2008 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का आ. संख्या 258 तारीख 09-02-2008 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची मंडल विजयपुरम, जिला- चित्तूर, राज्य आन्ध्रप्रदेश मे चेन्नै पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मनाली कि रिफैनेरी से देवनगुट्टि टर्मिनल, बैंगलुर तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्र अभिसूचना की प्रतियां ता. 20-05-2008 को जनता को उपलब्ध करा भी गई थी ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिर्पोट दे दीहै ;

अतः , अक्र, कंन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूचि में विनिर्दष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय सभी विल्लगमों से भुक्तहोकर प्रकाशन की तारीख से इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य : आन्ध्रप्रदेश

जिला: चित्तूर

मंडल : विजयपुरम

क्षेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

उप-खण्ड सं .

वर्ग मिटर

हेक्टर एयर

सर्वेक्षण स- खण्डसं.

15A

136

28. श्रीहरिपुरम

133

124

29. महाराजापुरम

246

32, पाथःअरको ८

101

154

155

[फा, सं. आर-250115/2007- ओ.आर.- 1 ]

एस. के. चिटकारा, अवर सचिव 6223 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 11th November, 2008

S. O. 3125, Whereas by the notification of the Government of India. Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas . S.O.No. 258 dated 09-02-2008 under sub section (1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land specified in the schedule relating to Mandal Vijayapuram , Dist. Chittoor , State Andhra pradesh , annexed to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Refinery of Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited , manali to Devanguthi Terminal , Bangalore, by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited .

And whereas, the copies of the said Gazette Notification were made available to the general public on date of 20-05-2008;

And whereas the Competent Authority has under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government;

And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired.

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of the section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the Right ofUser in the land specified in the Schedule annexed to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline,

And further in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby direct that the Right of User in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vests from the date ofpublication of this declaration in the Indian oil corporation limited, free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

State: Andhra Pradesh

District :Chittoor

Mandal : Vijayapuram

Area

Sub-Division No.

SurveyNo.

Name of the Village

Are Sq. Mtr.

Hectare

15A

136

28, SRIHARIPURAM

133

124

29, MAHARAJAPURAM

246

32, PATHA ARCOD

101

154

155

[F. No. R-25011/5/2007-O.R. - I ] 4585 G1/084

S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secу.

[PART 11-- SEC , 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29 , 2008/ AGRAHAYANA 8, 1930

6224

नई दिल्ली , 11 नवम्बर,, 2008

का. आ. 3126.- केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी , भारत के राजपत्र, तारीख 08-02-2008 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का आ. संख्या 259 तारीख 09-02-2008 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची मंडल बैरेड्डीपल्लि , जिला- चित्तूर , राज्य आ-ध्रप्रदेश में चेन्नै पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मनाली कि रिफैनेरी से देवनगुट्टि टर्मिनल, बैंगलुर तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां वा. 20-05-2008 को जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम को धारा 6 की. उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिर्पोट दे दीहै:

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिर्पोट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्द्र अनुसूचि में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए;

अत्तः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्द्र अनुसूचि मे विनिर्दष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की तारीख से इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरशन लिमिटेड निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य : आन्ध्रप्रदेश मंडल : बैरेड्डीपल्लि

जिला: चित्तूर

क्षेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

उप-खण्ड सं.

सर्वेक्षण से- खण्ड में .

हेक्टर

वर्ग मिटर

एयर

6 1

84,31

[फा. सं . आर 25017/5/2007 ओ.आर. - 1 ]

एस . के. चिटकारा , अत्तर सचिव 6225 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) }

New Delhi , the 11th November, 2008

S. O. 3126.Whereas by the notification of the Government of India . Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas . S.O.No. 259 dated 09-02-2008 under sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) the Central Government declared its Intention to acquire the Right of User in the land specified in the schedule relating to Mandal Baireddypalli , Dist . Chittoor , State Andhra pradesh , annexed to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Refinery of Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited, manali to Devanguthi Terminal , Bangalore , by the indian Oil Corporation Limited .

And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette Notification were made available to the general public on date of 20-05-2008;

And whereas the Competent Authority has under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government ;

And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that Right of User in the land specified in the schedule appended to this notification should be acquired.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conterred by sub -section ( 1 ) of the section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule annexed to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline.

And further in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 4 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby direct that the Right of User in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vests from the date of publication of this declaration in the Indian oil corporation limited free from all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

State:Andhra Pradesh

District: Chittoor-

Mandal : Baireddypalli

Area

Sub- Division No.

Survey No.

Name of the Village

Are Sq. Mtr .

Hectare

83 , GOLLACHEEMANAPALLI

269

84, ALAPALLI

[F. No. R- 25011/5/2007 - O.R. - I ]

S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

6226

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29 , 2008 / AGRAHAYANA 8 , 1930

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर ,, 2008

का. आ. 3127.- केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन अधिनियम 1962 (1982 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी , भारत के राजपत्र, तारीख 08-02-2008 मे प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का आ . संख्या 260 तारीख 09-02-2008 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्व अनुसूची मंडल - बंगारुपालेम, जिला- चित्तूर , राज्य आन्ध्रप्रदेश मे चेन्नै पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मनाली कि रिफैनेरी से देवनगुट्टि टर्मिनल , बैंगलुर तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां ता. 2005-2008 को जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 को उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्व अनुसूचि मे विनिर्दष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।

और केंन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय सभी विल्लगमों से मुक्त होकर प्रकाशन की तारीख से इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची मंडल : बंगारुपालेम

राज्य : आन्ध्रप्रदेश

जिला : चित्तूर

संबंक्षण स-

गाँव का नाम

उप-खण्ड सं .

खण्डसं.

3 69, अंकुरिपल्लि

103

6 70 , गोल्लापल्ले

147

173

2 72, गांगिलि

172

140

4 क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मिटर

हेक्टर एयर

00 6227 भारत की राजपत्र: नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8, 1930

[ भाग - खण्ड 3 ( ⅱ) ]

New Delhi , the 11th November, 2008

S. O. 3127.--Whereas by the notification of the Government of India. Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas . S.O.No. 260 dated 09-02-2008 under sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land specified in the schedule relating to Mandal Bangarupalyam , Dist. Chittoor , State Andhra pradesh , annexed to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Refinery of Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited, manall to Devanguthi Terminal , Bangalore , by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited Andwhereas, the copies of the said Gazette Notification were made available to the general public on date of 20-05-2008;

And whereas the Competent Authority has under sub- section (1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government;

And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired .

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1 ) of the section 6 of the said Act, the Central Govemment hereby declares that the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule annexed to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline.

And further in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby direct that the Right of User in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vests from the date of publication of this declaration in the Indian oil corporation limited free from all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

State: Andhra Pradesh

District: Chittoor

Mandal : Bangarupalem

Area

Sub -Division No.

SurveyNo.

Name of the Village

Are Sq. Mitr .

Hectare

103

69, JAMBUVARIPALLI

70, GOLLAPALLE

681

147

173

72,MOGILI

172

222

146

[F. No. R-25011/5/2007 -O.R.- ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secу.

6228

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA NOVEMBER 29 , 2008 / AGRAHAYANA 8, 1930

[ PART II- SL , 3 ( ii )

नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर,, 2008

का. आ. 3128.- केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी, भारत के राजपत्र, तारीख 08-02-2008 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का आ. संख्या 261 तारीख 09-02-2008 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्द्व अनुसूची मंडल- यादामारि, जिला- चित्तूर, राज्य आन्ध्रप्रदेश मे चेन्नै पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, मनाली कि रिफैनेरी से देवनगुष्टि टर्मिनल, बैंगलुर तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग के अधिकार काअर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां ता 2005-2008 को जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

अत्तः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्द्व अनुसूचि मे विनिर्दष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।

अनुसूची

राज्य: आन्ध्रप्रदेश मंडल : यादिामारि

जिला : चित्तूर

क्षेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

रुप- खण्ड सं .

हेक्टर

वर्ग मिटर

एयर

सर्वेक्षण स - खण्ड सं .

6 1

246

04 64, पेरियांबाडि

246

243

242

237

86 68, बुडिटिंरेडिपल्ले

[फा. से. आर -23011 / 5 /2007 - ओ.आर.- [ ]

एम. के . चिटकारा , अवर सचिव 6229 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8, 1930

New Delhi , the 11th November. 2008

S. O. 3128 -Whereas by the notification of the Government of India . Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas . S.O.No. 261 dated 09-02-2008 under sub section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land specifled in the schedule relating to Manda! Yadamari , Dist . Chittoor , State Andhra pradesh , annexed to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Refinery of Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited, manali to Devanguthi Terminal , Bangalore , by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited .

And whereas , the copies of the said Gazette Notification were made available to the general public on date of 20-05-2008;

And whereas the Competent Authority has under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government;

And whereas , the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of the section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the Right ofUser in the land specified in the Schedule annexed to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline.

And further in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby, direct that the Right of User in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vests from the date of publication of this declaration in the Indian oil corporation limited free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

State:Andhra Pradesh Mandal : Yadamari

District : Chittoor

Sub-Division No

Name of the Village

SurveyNo.

Area Are Sg. Mtr .

Hectare

246

64, PERIYAMBADI

246

243

242

237

66,BUDITIREDDIPALLE

[F. No. R-25011 /5/2007-0.R. -1 ]

S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

6230

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29, 2008/AGRAHAYANA 8. 1930

[ PART II- SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 11 नवम्बर,, 2008

का. आ. 3129.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि तामिलनाडु राज्य में चेन्नै से कर्नाटक राज्य में बेंगलुरु तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और, केंद्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है और जिसमें पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केद्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार काअर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियो का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में नर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्री आर. आर. जन्नु, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन डिवीजन, हाउस नं 142/2 , 2 कास, मुनी रैंडी लेआउट , होरमाव मेन रोड, डोडा बानसवाड़ी , बेंगलुरु-560043 कर्नाटक को लिखित रूप में भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य : कर्नाटक

जिला : कोलार

तालूका: मुलबागल

क्षेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

सर्वेक्षण सं/उप-खण्ड सं.

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर एयर

5 1

48 रामचन्द्रपुरा

69 पडाकास्ति

69/5

23 चित्थेरी

65/3

66/P1

36 बन्डहल्लि

4/1

4/2

1 }

20/5

मिणिजेनहल्लि

82/6

[फा. सं. आर-25011/8/2007-ओ.आर.- 6231 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (1) ]

New Delhi , the 11th November, 2008

S. O. 3129.Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Chennai in the State of Tamilnadu to Bengaluru in the State of Karnataka , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And, whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (i ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri R.R Jannu , Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited , Pipelines Division , House No. 142/2 , 2nd cross , Muni Reddy Layout, Horamavu Main Road, Dodda Banasavadi Bengaluru 560043. ( Karnataka )

SCHEDULE

State: Karnataka

District: Kolar

Taluk: Mulbagal

Area

SurveyNo/Sub -division No

Name of the village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

RAMACHANDRAPURA

69/5

PADAKASTI

CHITTHERI

65/3

66/P1

27 36

4/1

BANDAHALLI

4/2

}

01 83

20/5

MINIJENAHALLI

82/6

[F. No. R-25011 /8/2007 - O.R. - I ] 4585 G1/08-5

S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

6232

HIE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29 , 2008/ AGRAHAYANA 8. 19 .

PAR : I- S . 3 ( 11)

1 नवम्बर,, 2008

का. आ. 3130.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि तामिलनाडु राज्य में चेन्नै से कर्नाटक राज्य में बेंगलुरु तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और, केंद्रीय सरकार को उक्लाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जो इस अभिभकया से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित हैं और जिसमें पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग केकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केंद्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलिया और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का ७० ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियो का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्री आर . आर. जन्तु, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , पाइपलाइन डिवीजन, हाउस नं 142/2 , 2 कास , मुनी रैडी लेआउट, होरमाव मेन रोड , डोडा बानसबाड़ी अंकुरु-560043 कर्नाटक को लिखित रूप में भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य : कर्नाटक

जिला : कोलार

तालुका: बंगारपेट

क्षेत्रफल

सर्वेक्षण संप- खण्ड सं.

गाँव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टर

बादं‌डाहल्लि

58/2

भावहल्लि

57/2

72/4

मुगालाबेले

156/2

[ एन. आर-25011 /8 /2007- ओ.आर. - ।। 6233 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29 , 2008/ अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

New Delhi , the 11th November, 2008

S. 0. 3130.-Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Chennai in the State of Tamilnadu to Bengaluru in the State of Karnataka , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( i ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri R.R Jannu , Competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited , Pipelines Division , House No. 142/2 , 2nd cross , Muni Reddy Layout , Horamavu Main Road , Dodda Banasavadi Bengaluru - 560043. ( Karnataka )

SCHEDULE

State: Kamataka

District: - Kolar

Taluka: -Bangarpet

Area

SurveyNo/Sub -division No

Nameof village

Are Sq.mtr .

Hectare

20 VADANDAHALLI

58/2

MAVAHALLI

04 75

57/2

72/4

10 MUGALBELE

156/2

[F. No. R-25011 /8 /2007 - O.R. -I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

6234

TIL GAZETTE OF INDIA . NOVEMBER 29. 2008/ AGRAHAYANA 8, 1930 [PART 11-SFC 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर,, 2008

का. आ. 3131.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि तामिलनाडु राज्य में चेन्नै से कर्नाटक राज्य में बेंगलुरु तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और, केद्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है और जिसमें पाइपलाइन बिछाए, जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केंद्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियो का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्री आर. आर . जन्तु, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरशन लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन डिवीजन , हाउस नं 142/2 , 2 कास , मुनी रैडी लेआउट , होरमाव मेन रोड , डोडा बानसवाड़ी , बेंगलुरु -560043 कर्नाटक को लिखित रूप में भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य : कर्नाटक

जिला : कोलार

तालुका : मालुर

क्षेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

सर्वेक्ष्य सं/उप- खण्ड सं .

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर एयर 1

00 नाक्कनाहल्लि

15 निधरमंगला

155

कडसनहल्लि

25 पुरमाकनहल्लि

98/1

योशवन्तपुरा

19/6P1

87 धाडाकडथुरु

158

[फा. से. आर-25011/8 /2007-ओ.आर. - 1 ]

एभ, के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव 6235 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ü) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8, 1930

New Delhi , the 11th November, 2008

S. 0. 3131. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Chennai in the State of Tamilnadu to Bengaluru in the State of Karnataka , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And, whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( i) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri R.R Jannu, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited , Pipelines Division , House No. 142/2, 2nd cross , Muni Reddy Layout ,Horamavu Main Road, Dodda Banasavadi Bengaluru - 560043. (Karnataka)

SCHEDULE

State : Karnataka

District: Kolar

Taluka : Malur

Area

SurveyNo/Sub-division No

Nameof village

Are Sq.mtr.

Hectare

NAKKANAHALLI

155

NIDHARAMANGALA

KADASANNAHALLI

PURAMAKANHALLI

98/1

YESHWANTHAPURA

19/6P1

DHADDA KADATHURU

158

[F. No. R-25011 /8/2007-0.R. -11 S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

6236

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 29, 2008/ AGRAHAYANA 8, 19.30

[ PARC U- SEC . 3 ( 1 ) |

नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर,, 2008

का. आ. 3132.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि तामिलनाडु राज्य में चेन्नै से कर्नाटक राज्य में बेंगलुरु तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और, केद्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है और जिसमें पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केंद्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियो का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्री आर . आर. जन्नु, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, पाइपलाइन डिवीजन , हाउस नं 142/2 , 2 कास, मुनी रैडी लेआउट , होरमाव मेन रोड, डोडा बानसवाड़ी , बेंगलुरु -560043 कर्नाटक को लिखित रूप में भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य : कर्नाटक तालूका: होसकोटे

जिला: बेंगलुरु रुरल

क्षेत्रफल गाँव का नाम

सर्वेक्षण सं/उप- खण्ड सं .

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टर

एयर 1

00 कटिंगेनाहल्लि देवरगेल्लहल्ली

[फा. सं. आर-25011/8 /2007- ओ.आर.- [ ]

एस. के. चिटकाए , अवर सचिव 6237 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29 , 2008 /अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

I-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 11th November, 2008

S. 0. 3132-Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Chennai in the State of Tamilnadu to Bengaluru in the State of Karnataka , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( i ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri R.R Jannu , Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Pipelines Division , House No. 142/2 , 2nd cross , Muni Reddy Layout , Horamavu Main Road, Dodda Banasavadi Bengaluru - 560043. ( Karnataka )

SCHEDULE

State : Karnataka Taluka: Hoskote

District: Bengaluru Rural

Area

SurveyNo/Sub-division No

Nameof village

Are Sq.mtr.

Hectare

KATTIGENAHALLI

DEVROGOLLAHALLY

[F. No. R-25011 / 8/2007 - O.R. - I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

6238

[ PARO 11-SB . 3 ( ⅱ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29, 2008/AGRAHAYANA 8, 19.3

नई दिल्ली, 27 नवम्बर,, 2008

का. आ. 3133. - केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1296 तारीख 5 जून , 2008 , जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 7 जून, 2008 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में बीना संस्थापन से राजस्थान राज्य में कोटा तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए बीना- कोटा पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 18 सितम्बर, 2008 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन, केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिये अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता हैं ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, भारत पेट्रोलियम कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य: मध्य प्रदेश तहसील अशोक नगर

जिला: अशोक नगर

क्र.सं.

क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में ग्राम का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

4 1

173

0.1625 1 खजूरिया खुर्द

133

0.0800 बीरपुर

113

0 5495

101

0 3900

0.0585 3

सागर

0.2080

0.0910

110

0.3125 6239

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29 , 2008/अग्रहायण 8, 1930

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

क्र.सं.

ग्राम का नाम

2 1

4 आमसोड़ा तुमेन

5 डंगाही

मैंसरवास

बासश

8 कुरवाय

बहेरीपछार

दमोह

11 मढ़ीकानूनगो

12 विजयपुरा

13 कैथाई

कैलारस

4585 G1 /088

क्षेत्रफल हैक्टेयर में सर्वे नंबर

0.0715

266

0.1755

0.6910

0.1500

257

0.2500

252

0.0150

732

0.1305

614

0.2990

496

0.1655

499

0.1610

475

0.0590

473

0.3000

131

0.4450

133

0.2650

122

0.4665

107

0.0900

117

0.0845

0.3835

0.3185

0.1560

245

0.1400

244

0.1235

110

0.3705

382

0.2600

0.4945

404

0.1300

0.3030

0.0050

180

0.1040

148

0.1885

0.2210

[फा. सं. आर-31015/8/2008 -ओ.आर- || ]

ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव 2

EOSINDA NSR29, 2008/A-GRABIAYANA

New Delle 27th November , 2008

5- וויי of the Government of indie in the Ministry of No 1295, deted the 5th June , 2008cdsal - section fucrals Pipelines (Acquis.tief Rigin of User in (1) the Petroleum a.. Land peterred to as the suk bed in the Gazette of traded the ? Joe the Cemal Coveminent ccted intention to 20q0ecenthe Schedule apperficion fezth smspettaren of petroleum Fotough Bina- inthe date at Madhy Stute of Nabee Bharat Lauted :

sere made toate ea

said Acı ,

the said .:

jane nas Jecided to seeight user

Now

the seid

abbvs - section

of user

erred by s b -section ( acin the sid !

We right of user in dedunt for layin

Coveamem. :,'

* Corporation elem [ भाग - खण्ड ( ii) ]

624]

भारत का राजयत्र : नवम्बर 29 , 2003 /अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

SCHEDULE

TEHSIL ASHOK NAGAR DISTRICT ASHOK NAGAR STATE: MADHYA PRADESH S.Mc.

NAME OF VILLAGE 1

KHAJURIA KHURD 2

BIRPUR き

SAGAR 4

AMEKHEDA TUMEN

DANGAHI 6

BHAISARWAS 7

BASRA 8

KURVAY 9

BAHERI PACHHAR 10

DAMOH SURVEY NO .

AREA IN HECTARE 3

173

0.1625

133

0.0800

113

0.5495

101

0.3900

0.0585

0.2080

0.0910

110

0.3125

266

0.0715

0.1755

0.6910

257

0.1500

252

0.2500

732

0.0150

614

0.1305

496

0.2990

499

0.1655

475

0.1610

473

0.0590

131

0.3000

133

0.4450

122

0.2650

107

0.4665

117

0.0900

0.0845

0.3835

0.3185

245

0.1560

0.1400

244 P1- S300] 6242

TIL CAZETTE OF INDIA: N.BER 29, 2018/ AGRAHAYANAK 100

AREA IN HECTARE

SURVEY NO.

S.No.

NAME OF VILLAGE

له

110

0.1235 11

MADKI KANUNGO

0.3705

382

0.2600

0.49:5

404

0.1300

VIJAYPURA

0 3030

KAITHAI

0.0050

180

01040

148

0.1885

KELARAS

3.2210

[No. R-31015/8/2008-O.R. - I1 ; A. GOSWAMI Under Secy.

नई 25 नवम्बर,, 2008

का. आ. 31.34 पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन (भू उपयोग अधिकार अधिग्रहण ) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 के 50 ) के खंड 2 की धार ( क ) के अनुसरण में , केन्द्र सरकार एतदद्वारा श्री के नागेश्वर राव , स्पेशल डिप्टी कलेक्टर , आंध्र प्रदेश सरकार को आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य की सीमा में हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड की विशाख-विजयवाडा-सिकन्द्राबाद पाइप लाइन में श्री टी अप्पाराव, जिन्हें पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय में भारत सरकार की अधिसूचना संख्या एस.ओ. 3320 के द्वारा दिनांक 16 नवम्बर , 2007 को प्राधिकृत किया गया था, के स्थान पर उक्त अधिनियम के सहत सक्षम प्राधिकारी के रूप में कार्य करने और कांचे निष्पादन करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है।

[फा.सं.२००15/ 11 /2003 - ओ.आर ।। ]

ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव

New De the 25th November, 2008

S. 0. 3134.-- In pursuance of clause (a) of section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby authorizes Shri K. Nageswara Rao, Special Deputy Collector, Government of Andhra Pradesh to perform the functions of competent authority under the said Act within the territory of the State of Andhra Pradesh for Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited's Visakh- Vijayawada- Secunderabad Pipeline in place of Shri T. Appa Rao authorized vide notification of Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , number S.O. 3320 dated the 16th November , 2007

10. R-31015 /11/2003-O.R. -II ] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.

6243 भारत का राजपत्र भवम्बर 29 , 2008/ अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[ भाग 11- खण्ड ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 20 मवम्बर,, 2008

का. आ. 3135.- केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 2 के खण्ड (अ ) अनुसरण में , भारत के राजपत्र , तारीख 27 दिसम्बर, 2007 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का .आ. 3621 तारीख 29 दिसम्बर , 2007 का निम्नलिखित रुप से संशोधन करती है, अर्थात:-

उक्त आधिसूचना की अनुसूची के स्तम्भ 1 में " नं 719 ग्राउंड फ्लोर , 4 कास , 7th मेन रोड , कल्याण नगर , 1 ब्लाक , बेंगलुरु -560043 ( कर्नाटक ) " शब्दों और अंकों के स्थान पर " हाउस नं 142/2 , 2nd क्रास , मुनी रैडी लेआउट होरमाव मेन रोड ,डोडा बानसवाड़ी , बेंगलुरु- 560043 (कर्नाटक ) " शब्द और अंक रखे जाएंगे ।

[फा सं. आर-25011 / 12/2006- ओ. आर. - 11 एस. के. चिटकारा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 20th November , 2008

S. O. 3135.-in pursuance of clause (a) of section 2 of the petroleum and Minerals Pipeline ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government here by makes the following amendments in the notification of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , Government of India number S.O. 3621 dated the 27th December 2007 published in the Gazette of India dated the 29th December ,2007as follows , namely: -

In the said notification , in the schedule , under column 1 , for the words and numbers , " No - 719 , Ground Floor , 4th cross , 7th Main Road, Kalyana nagar , 1st Block, Bangalore - 560043 ( Karnataka ) " the words and numbers , "House No - 142/2 , 2nd Cross , Mani Reddy Layout, Horamavu Main Road, Dodda Banasavadi , Bengaluru- 560043. ( Karnataka) " , shall be substituted.

[ F. No. R- 25011 /12/ 2006 - O.R. - I ] S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

6244

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29, 2008/ AGRAHAYANAS 19

PACT Fi-Sir . 3 ( ii ) j

===

नई दिल्ली , 20 नवम्बर,, 2008

का. आ. 3136.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी, भारत के राजपत्र, तारीख 26 अप्रैल, 2008 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का. आ. संख्या 3 तारीख 24 अप्रैल, 2008 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में , गुजरात राज्य में स्थापित कोयली - दहेज पाइपलाइन की शाखा आमोद से हजीरा तक पेट्रोलियग उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन विछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी,

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 1 मई, 2008 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी.

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दे दी है .

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात यह रामाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचनः से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार अर्जित किया जाए;

अतः अच, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियो का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि पाइपलाइन विघ्शने के लिए इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्त्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में सभी दिल्लगमों से मुक्त घोषणा के प्रकाशन की इस तारीख को निहित होगा । 6245 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8, 1930

[भाग 1]- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

अनुसूची

क्षेत्रफल

गाव

जिला

राज्य

तालुका

सर्वेक्षण सं. रुप - खण्ड सं .

वर्गमीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

210

भरुच आमोद

इटोला

गुजरात

211

212

226

290

289

281

282

283

385

388

384

382

376

375

374

360

369

451

462

480

461

459

489

488

490

491

493

782

कोलवणा

782

781

754

780

772

779

785

776

791

773

792

793

827

828

826

852

851

850

853

1026

1016

1017

101B

00 6246

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29 , 2008/AGRAHAYANA 8, 1930

...

1019

1::25

(नारी)

1024

1020

1023

1021

1022

1011

1010

1099

1114

1128

1115

116

1117

1:18

1123

1207

1208

1223

1224

1225

1251

1252

1253

1256

1250

1287

1285

1327

1329

556

657

1376

1377

1379

1381

1391

648

1409

1408

652

654

682

1404

749

1403

1401

1402

तागरा

पीएं आड

133

136

ZAB 2

142

114

[ PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] R

100

36 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8, 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

A/ 1-1

वीछीआड

A/2-P3

(जारी)

B-P3

121

साचण

120

145

135

150

163

166

169

187

185

189

181

180

211

210

212

214

213

225

682

वागरा

683

728

727

724

723

709

722

711

713

714

720

719

71B

746

752

762

764

765

795

796

पीसाद

P2 4585 G1/08-7

6247

09 AT OF INDIA

JAGRAN

201 ::

نا

に

39 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8, 1930

[ भाग 11- खण्ड ( ii ) ]

410

(जारी)

295

308

293

310

1012

1013

1014

7031

1332

1038

1042

1039

1046

1045

951

052

941

950

942

944

346

340

945

868

891

877

878

875

872

857

861

865

864

778

779

नवेठा

110

111

112

134

136

135

139

146

148

6249 7

2日

00 6250

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA . NOVEMBER 29 , 2008/AGRAHAYANA 8, 1930

149

नवेद।

150

(जारी)

12B

$50

180

192

217

216

214

3'2

311

313

310

300

270

324

274

277

188

(नाड़भुत)

195

187

195

199

180

178

200

201

202

179

252

248

249

246

313

317

316

339

340

311

337

344

376

375

370

37 :

4:3

445

301

अलेग्गर

753

351

3.2

337

[PART li- St . 3 (ii ) ] 19

८०

心

0:0

15 6251 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29 , 2008/ अग्रहायण 8, 1930

[भाग- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

338

314

धंतुरीया (जारी)

330

317

318

316

318

297

298

296

278

280

281

282

283

284

240

175

176

177

178

170

180

133

00 00 88888888888 00

121232

18888 00

509

माटीओड

509

510

507

550

549 6252

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29 , 2008 /AGRAHAYANA & 14,0

गार्टीजेद

635

(जारी)

639

5.35

639

642

657

650

€50

662

609

ら

566

223

2: 9

215

217

214

209

160

190

186

179

161

171

170

155

164

193

हांसोट

मोदिया

ラア

219

583

दीपस

586

609

608

6.08

314

615

643

516

517

642

Eta

519

624

526

[ PAR - SE 3 ( ii ) } B

Dü

نیاز

ου

ومن

00 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8, 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( i ) ]

527

दीगस

532

(जारी)

529

531

605

503

492

473

470

404

450

451

452

453

454

442

440

438

437

416

404

403

401

402

383

316

317

347

352

354

361

360

338

362

अंकलेश्यर मोतवाण

172

173

191

कलम

हांसोट

A/ 2

B / 1

A/2

A+ B

30 00

21 00

04 00

51 00

64 00

83 00

58 00

70 00

81 00

41 00

49 00

78 00

64 00

18 00

27 00

68 00

90 00

24 00

79 00

28 00

32 00

42 00

86 00

28 00

95 00

00 6254

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA ; NOVEMBER 29 , 2008 / AGRAHAYANA 8, 10.30

कलम

हासोट

(जारी)

525

रोहीद

523

194

495

496

521

520

519

4.3

500

201

502

303

393

363

354

305

350

367

388

360

264

28:

200

270

279

265

217

2:58

269

2: 1

256

255

135

કુડ -***?

152

143

*39

:33

137

133

[PART II- Sec. 3 ( i ) ) 7

ون

29 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8, 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

कुखादेश

(जारी)

418

परवद

417

415

413

414

288

286

287

285

319

320

325

324

327

328

333

370

368

364

363

341

342

340

189

188

190

188

197

198

199

200

202

203

212

211

210

152

150

148

149

135

133

183

ओभा

194

185

199

171

169

168

167

217

218

219 4585 G1/088

6255

00 6250.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29, 2008 /AGRAHAYANA 8, 1/0

[PART 11 - S300) -..

227

101

: 59

148

147

141

156

166

126

.. ?

119

11P

4リ

1917

1012

1216

1:42

८०

142

1:21

الان 6257

नवम्बर 29 , 2008 /अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

भारत का राजपत्र

[ भाग 1]- खष्ठ 3( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 20th November, 2008

S. O. 3136.- Whereas by a notification of the Government of India , Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas Number S.O. 893 dated 26-04-2008 under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962), the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the schedule annexed to that notification for the purpose of laying a branch pipeline from existing Koyali - Dahej pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Amod to Hazira in the State of Gujarat by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas , the copies of the said gazette notification were made available to the general public on the 1st May, 2008;

And whereas , the Competent Authority has submitted report to the Central Government;

And whereas , the Central Government has after considering the report and on being satisfied that said land is required for laying pipeline has decided to acquire the right of user their in;

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule annexed to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government vest on this date of publication of this declaration in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .

6258

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29, 2008/ AGRAHAYANA $. 1930

SCHEDULE District Taluka

State

Village

Survey / Block No.

Intola

210

Amad

Gujarat Bharuch

211

212

226

290

269

281

282

283

385

386

384

382

376

375

374

360

369

451

462

460

461

459

489

488

490

491

493

782

Kolwana

782

781

754

780

772

779

785

776

791

773

792

793

827

828

926

852

351

850

853

1026

1016

1017

1018

[PART II-SH

Area

Are Sq.mt Sub -Division No. Hect .

מם

15 1

90 1

51 2

03 3

81 3

15 6259 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[ भाग - खण्ड 3( ⅱ) ]

1019

1025

Kohwana (Contd.)

1024

1020

1023

1021

1022

1011

1010

1099

1114

1128

1115

1116

1117

1118

1123

1207

1208

1223

1224

1225

1251

1252

1253

1256

1250

1287

1286

1327

1329

666

667

1376

1377

1380

1379

1381

1391

648

1409

1408

652

654

682

33313 3

682

1404

749

1403

1401

1402

133

Vichhiad

Vagra

133

136

142

114

00 6260

[PART 11 - Sec. 3 ( tt ) ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29 , 2008 / AGRAHAYANA 8. 1930

A/1.1

A/2- P3

35 Vichhiad (Contd .)

654

B-P3

121

Sachan

120

145

146

135

150

163

168

169

167

185

189

181

180

211

210

212

214

213

225

682

42 Vagra

683

728

727

724

723

709

פס

722

711

713

714

720

719

718

746

752

762

764

765

795

796

34 Pisad

P2 6261

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008 /अग्रहायण 8, 1930

[ মাণ II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Pisad

(Contd.)

Saran

109

108

110

117.

150

149

166

147

167

168

169

195

190

188

240

113

Sayakha

114

115 .

116

140

141

152

154

153

166

167

170

223

409

227

228

229

232

255

256

257

270

269

276

275

277

283

285

284

71 00

92 03

81 00

26 00

02 00

80 16

86 00

78 19

37 37

38 00

35 04

72 00

04 00

01 00

33 00

78 00

14 00

28 00

50 00

16 00

87 00

77 00

68 00

94 00

04 00

97 00

87 00

92 00

50 00

10 00

88 00

36 00

50 00

54 00

91 00

67 00

26 00

59 00

52 THE GAZETIE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 24 , 2008/ AGRAHAYANA 8. 19.30

6262

410

Sayakha

410

(Contd.1

295

308

293

310

1012

Amleshwar

Bharuch

1013

1014

1031

1032

1038

1042

1039

1046

1045

951

952

941

950

942

944

945

940

945

888

891

877

876

875

872

867

861

B65

864

778

779

Shankhwad

110

Navetha

111

112

134

136

135

139

146

148

[PART 11- SPA 3 ( 1 )

23 DO

78 00

35 00

38 P

78 P2

29 P1

31 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8, 1930 [ भाग II- खण्ड ( ii) ]

149

150

Navetha (Contd)

128

150

180

192

217

216

214

312

311

313

310

309

270

324

274

277

188

Mustfabad (Bhedbhut)

186

187

195

199

180

178

200

201

202

179

252

248

249

246

313

318

317

316

339

340

341

337

344

376

369

375

370

371

437

436

445

351

Ankleshwar Dhanturia

383

381

373

372

337

4585 G1/089

9 7

79 00

25 00

52 00

25 00

98 00

86 00

87 00

74 00

55 00

00 00

60 00

06 00

75 00

23 00

04 00

46 00

02 00

38 00

22 00

81 00

54 00

98 00

85 00

83 00

16 00

10 00

24 00

54 00

98 00

28 00

16 CO

09 00

99 00

20 00

32 00

15.

6264

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA , MBER 29, 2008/AGRA

...

Chantur>

338

314

330

317

316

319

297

296

279

280

281

282

283

284

240

175

176

177

17;

178

179

180

133

Mokas

509

609 509

513

510

507

550

549

اين

24 A

21 20

40 i ..

98 ZA

&ε

اتوا

زان ??

3?????

12 23J

0 :

3233

32833

??|

??????

2332

???????????

1 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारद का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29 , 2008/ अग्रहायण 3 , 1930

548

636

Maliad (Contd.)

638

635

639

640

642

657

658

660

661

662

669

667

666

220

219

218

217

214

209

189

190

186

179

180

181

171

170

165

164

163

130

Hansot

Mothia

219

583

Digas

586

609

608

614

615

643

616

617

642

618

619

624

526

92 A

18 ABR A B

33 6266

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBV29.200 / AGRAHAYANA ..

G 2

527

Digzs

532

(Conto )

529

531

505

503

492

473

164

450

451

452

453

454

447

44)

436

457

416

403

401

402

393

9:6

317

347

352

354

361

300

338

362

172

Ankleshwa

173

131

Kalam

Hansat

A/ 2

A/2

2.!

11.

30 7:

CA 00

27 30

25.

98 318 05

51 20

23 30

0 6267

भारत का राजपत्र' नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[ भाग 1]- खण्ड ( ii) ]

Kalam

Hansot

(Contd.)

525

Rohid

523

494

495

496

521

520

519

476

474

500

501

502

503

393

363

364

365

366

367

389

360

264

281

280

278

279

235

277

268

269

271

270

256

무

255

135

Kudadara

153

152

145

144

143

139

138

137

133

A 7

42 00

16 00

47 00

62 00

43 00

40 00

55 00

77 12

03 06

05 00

47 00

52 00

82 00

32 00

41 00

47 00

70 00

08 00

93 00

59 00

05 00

77 00

28 00

92 00

61 00

11 00

33 00

86 00

53 00

12 00

29 6268

סיר

OF INDIA NEKINAGRAHAYANA 8. 11

(Con'd)

Pest

に

تان

アン

یتو

.33

ین

ล

0 :

११

Oons

:08

34 6269 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29 , 2008/ अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

Obha

220

161

22 (Contd.)

160

144

159

146

147

158

141

156

155

126

127

128

119

118

117

112

455

456

458

1249

1203

1248

1247

1246

.00

1204

1207

1208

1211

1212

1215

1216

1143

1142

1141

1129

1133

1130

1131

1132

1123

F. No. R- 25011 / 1 /2008-0.R. -1

S. K. CHITKARA , Under Secy.

6270

THE CATTE OF BONER 29 , 2608/ AGRAHAM

Employees Unionisie Dy General Ma

Syndicate Bank, ad

अम एवं रोजगार महालय नई किन्ननी , 31 अक्टूता, 200818

"Whether !

The Mager

Syndicate Bank

arise the Services Si अनुसरण

(1947 का 14 )

Rain Lal , part tirindestetied सिंडीकेट बैंक के

what refer tわさしく

itsmarknan is that he was

2. In brief.

औद्योगिक न्यायालय को

unter

appointed as part 1 Extension सं. 20.2008 )

Syndicate Ban :

Rs .440 per rent

31-10 200

letter pad tire werkdag

...

chanced te tonee

per menti: which

the scale wages the is working as wh

since then withouwerte no be treated as MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOY

Nen Datta the 1st October , 200 %

appointed on pernes against a permanent pest The workman has pris

the Begum 40 :

hinas permanentis Rank

Industrial

1947144

3. The mone

Governeliste the Aw

wurkman for reg .

2003 ) Tusu

Laborterasboun is the

roles d

appointed in ٢٠١

Industrial Lisage

the

reserved by

of the work apri

Bank and i Govemmerm

purely temporary is wokmim was Bever

service of the Ba work while become ine tren ANWENURE

9. permanent empie wurkm ΓΕΝΕΙΑRMANT INSP

TRIBUNU BORCOORL

de text.of India with resond PRANK PURCET!

Sortere be clea

in the writte regularization as it we canent he seesred ar per guidelines SLU to me filling of vas Daaarperret has not adopted any unfair ianconir .

11 , No. 20/2005

Merkman is not leave

Re: 22005103-1h deeds

40021-2 der knee an

application las

of the werkne

כל חי ריקלי .

The Secor , Bon Parokycus Urtalasie ...

elisag with: an as

Lucknow-

copy of the letter

(In the image of Puri

appointment to

AND

workman has a

the Bus Fe present dispare is

Meer sat ber

regarding regula

olliered regular app

The Dy Zonal Ofisit Road

dated 29-11-2007

The parties .

WARO

amanagement is Jer

200

the vase. The pres.

6-6-2005 theovers: Misu

th workman Sh .....

NewDeiluin Romero

Emooyces Unit

on the

sub-section ( sches

has been moved

Industrial Disintes Act 1947

said uuion . then

industriai die beweente Sc

to withdres ire भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8, 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

6. In the above circumstances it is held that there is no need to decide and reply the reference on merit and the same is disposed off as there is no grievance left with the workman after withdrawal of his case . The matter is resolved as above and the reference is answered accordingly.

N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर , 2008 का.आ. 3138- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब एण्ड सिंध बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विषाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार , औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम मंत्रालय कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 28/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-10-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/ 163 /2001- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] राजिन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st October , 2008

5.0. 3138.- in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 28/ 2001) of the Central Government industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Kanpur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Punjab and Sind Bank and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government ση31-10-2008 .

[No. L-12011/ 163/2001 - IR( B- II ) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI R. G SHUKLA PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT, KANPUR J. D. No. 28 of2001

BETWEEN

Sri Hari Prasad son of L. Laxaman Singh 1217/1550 Ratanpur Colony Panki , Kanpur. AND The Senior Manager , Punjab and Sindh Bank ,

BranchOffice,

Gadarian Purwa K - 622 , Kanpur.

AWARD

1. Central Government , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi vide notification No. L- 12012 / 163/200 ] IR -B - II dated 29-11-2001 has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal.

4585 G1 /08-10

627 ] 2. Whether the action ofthe management of Punjab &Sindh Bank Gadarian Purwa , Kanpur , in terminating the services ofSri Hari Prasad son of late Laxarman Singh w.c.f. 5-10-99 is legal and justified ? If not to what relief is the concerned workman entitled to?

3. It is the own case of the workman that he was engaged as a daily wager by the opposite party bank on 01-01-91 and worked as such till 4-10-99 and when he reported for his duty on 5-10-99 he was not allowed to work by the opposite party in this way his services have been removed by the opposite party bank in breach ofthe provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, inasmuch as at the time of his termination neither he was given notice mor notice pay the retrenchment compensationby tlac opposite party bank. Therefore, his termination falls within the term ofretrenchment which is bad in law and he is liable to be reinstated in the services of the bank.

4.A Part from above it has also been pleaded by the workman that beside performing daily work he was also doing the regular and permanent work entrusted upon him by the bank and he orally as well as in writing requesied the bank 10 absorb him in the service of the bank which annoyed the authorities of the bank as a result of which he was removed from the service in an illegal and arbitrary manner which is against the rules and against the provision ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947, which is liable to be set aside by this tribunal and he be directed to he reinstated in the service of the bank with full back wages and all consequential benefits.

5. On the other hand the claim of the workman have been vehemently denied by the opposite party bank on a number of grounds , inter- alia , that no officer of the opposite banks is empowered to appoint any employee in the bank unless he has been subjected to selection process framed under recruitment rules; that the workman has never been subjected to any sucli process , no appointment letter or termination letter has been issued to him , workman bas never been given regular wages from the approved budget of the bank, mere by way of working on the basis of daily rated workman he cannot lay his claim towards his reinstatement in the service ofthe bank, the disengagement of the workman cannot amount to retrenchment and heing so he cannot be protected under the provisions of L.D. Act. On the basis of above pleadings it has been prayed that the claim of the workman is devoid of marit as the opposit party never breached any of the provisions of the Act, therefore, the claim of the workman is liable to be rejected.

6. After exchange of pleadings between in parties both contesting parties have led oral as well as decume y evidence in support of their respective claims .

7. I have heard the arguments of the parties at and have also perused the evidence and docuus: ... available on record carefully .

8..It is pertinent to mention here that the instant case can be decided only on the basis of admission of facts 6272

ihaz OF INDIA NR 20, 2008 AGRAHAYΑΝΑ8, 930 PAR : SSD ignoting the clann aral evidence of the opposite .

in view setded kgal pession that the labh S

Industrial iribondson,aast supposed to be inseadas

for provudams appemesrat against public empacal

के बीच अनुबन्ध में श्रद्योगिक विवाद में केंन्द्रीय भार औद्योगिक अधिकरण श्रभवाय कानपुर के पंचन्ट संदर्भ सं. 15/2006 ) को कंन्द्रीय सरकार क 31-10-2008 को प्राप्त ।

without folimenistan ruies insieme

case Sint .En les del Mouble Supr ..

of India in starkeeb.i

0005 आईआर जाद कुमार, अधिकारी Court th

NewDelhaber . 2018

temporary cap

S.O. 3139 , fa primece of Section 17 of the to clatom recetaletne

he bas completed days of contirrions seri

Industrial Disputes A. 14 of 1947 , the Central

Government hereby pulesthe award ( Ref No. 15 20051 without under through rechtmerrs

ofthe Central Governaduscial Tribunal - com- tabour Hon'ble Supresenter India is itsks is...

also depresied the according scre

Cours . Kanpm as show the Annexure , in the Industrai Dispute between hement of Punjab and Sunded!

In view of this serid pal poscin , it stic

the own pleased workman that he was..

Bank and their received by the Central Government on 31-1-3

daily rate basi ne officer of the back of the

The opposite : ank in its reply has clearis d that no ofti ... Je bork is empowered to app !!

any perseni ant and all apponsmetus are

No 1-12012 5 2005-813-11 RAMINDER KUMAR, Desk Utiker ANNUNURE

to supervise and wattoi et the Head Offresi

BEFORE THE PRES OFFICER CENTRAL and only such perselis are offered reputar and pet

GOVERNMENT DUAL TRIBU NAL - CU M-

LABOUR COULEURAM BILAWAN ATL and interview :

CAMPUS.UTOVOG NAGAR KANPUR 9. Inverted also in view

the workman bus not whrwered even a singh,

Present Sri R. SHI KILA, KJS. Industrial Dispute No. 15:2005

in his pleadings les evidence about the s

the provisores on the service condition, there .

remams ivardan iced to thecuss further

comesting parues it tize instant case as it awgic cath futile exercise me parethe labour coun ...

provisions et Ti A catonet be read s

absence of pleaday regardingbreach of the

The Zonal Manger

Sai Vishal Kumar Miss Visage Kun So Ghanshyam Das Rio37:87. Nagla Paha Bagh Road. Agra AND Punjab And Sinde Bu

of service rules as the provisivas of the Mur termed to be prag the servi ..

ofthe work ore, in new elabor

8. Iwala Building , falucknow

AWARD

the provisions , Be

case of the uthe workers

entitled ter csshrated under ..

nec sech workm

1 Central Gam Mustry of Labour . Nea Delhi vide notificaier N 120125 2005 [ R- 3-11 Jucd 25-5-2005 . has telee the following dispite fir appointed ongeruilar ras

adjudication to this meal ka djudicaton

그. Whellieren of the management of stathat the workrem laneibs him . entitled ..

Pungah & Sindh Bari terminying the services of led that the workm

Sri Vishal Kumarali Asima Kenia waterbos pena saath

effect from27-2-200fd and legalin

relict is the concernkrais entitled?

beebid for werenefas clanned b ofabove Frerete, the referens be lecká put the pan and

3. In short there sprkman is that he was marngriment nd it is held accordingly.

appointed in the monde 1990 by the opposite poly

without any appointeren: cher agune 4th class guy.

SHUKLA. Presvet

Reference thereture amwered R.G

He performed the work hat post regularly for 8 Boms in

the bank and that he su perdermed the work of pron

which was of a regular permanent nature stili principles

of equal pay or each was tot followed by he :

1947 का

opposite party . All werk fost, the workinar: JUthe

branch where be ansported the opposite party

transferred branch at these emerson 6203

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29 , 2008/ अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[भाग 1 ]- खण्ड 3(ii) )

documentary evidence in support of their respective cases There is also joint inspection report filed by the parties

7. 1 have heard the contesting parties at length and havealso perused the relevant records of the case carefully .

8. It has been argued by the authorized representative for the workman that the workman had worked under the opposite party continuously for years together and has also performed the work of clerical nature apart from performing the job of peon cum water boy and that he was repeatedly given assurance by the concerned officers of the opposite party that he will be soon given appointinent order but by way of adopting unfair labour practice he was removed from the service of the bank even without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act . As against it, it has been argued by the representative for the opposite party that the workman was never appointed by the opposite party and that there never existed any relationship of employer and employee and that the workman was engaged by them as a casual employee as per exigency of work and he was paid accordingly on day to day basis and also that they never taken the work of clerical nature from the workman .

counter branch at Guru ka Tal Gurdwara Mathura Road Agra, in the year 1996. At that extension branch the workman apart from the work of peon had also performed thework ofclerk and when he claimed in this regard he was toldbythe officers of the branch that when he is discharging the work ofclerk he would automatically be deemed to be a clerk ofthe bank but despite repeated request made by the workman in this regard he was not issued any appointment letter in this respect by the opposite party bank . The opposite party denied the workman in marking his attendance at the attendance register but he was assured from time to time by the officers of the opposite party that he will be issued regular and permanent employment by issuing appointment letter . The workman has further pleaded that he made repeated request before the officers ofthe opposite party to declare him a clerk of the banch but they did not pay any heed in this regard. It has also been pleaded by the workman that at the time of terrnination ofhis services on 27-2-2002 , the workman was neither paid any notice , notice pay or retrenchment compensation by the opposite party therefore, the action of the opposite party bank is in gross violation of the provisions of section 25 F, 25 G and 25 H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and lastly that it has been prayed by him that he be reinstated in the service of the opposite party with full back wages , continuity of service and with all consequential benefits .

9. In view above it has become desirable to examine the fact as to what legal right could be derived in favour of the workman in view of his statement of claim and evidence led by him . In his cross examination the workman has categorically admitted the fact that the post against which he was engaged was never advertised by the hank in the newspapers and on the notice board the manager of the branch had informed to that effect . He further stated that on coming about the vacancy through neither notice board he visited at the branch and that no written examination was ever held in this regard , nor any call letter was issued to him by any of the officer of the branch. le categorically admitted the fact that he was never issued any appointment letter or any transfer letter from New Agra Branch to Guru Ka Tal Gurdwara branch of the bank . Workman has also admitted in his evidence having taken loan for opening shop for Parchoon and has also admitted the documents executed by him in this regard 4. The claim of the workman has been refuted by the opposite party on a variety of grounds. It has been pleaded that the applicant has never been appointed by the opposite party bank in any capacity whatsoever. Rather he was a casual employee for undertaking casual job on daytoday basis as per requirement and exigencies ofwork accordingly such casual employment does not create any or vest any right in him to claim any regular tenure in the bank. In view of above question of termination of his services does not arise at all . It is also denied by the opposite party bank that the workman had ever worked about 8 hours on any day . It has also been denied by the opposite party that they ever transferred the workman to its any of the branch . It has also been denied by the opposite party bank that they ever utilized the workman for taking clerical work at the branch or at their extension counter . Lastly the management has denied any relationship of employer and employee between them and the workman and on the above basis it is pleaded that the claim ofthe workman is devoid of merit and is liable tobe rejected as the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947, are not applicable in the case of the workman.

5. The workman has also filed his rejoinder statement in the case but a perusal of the same would reveal that nothing new has been pleaded in it than what has been pleaded in his statement of claim.

10. The attention of the tribunal was also drawn to thejoint inspection report dated 13-2-2007 document no . 18/1 available on the record of the case. A perusal of the same would go to reveal the fact that there are certain entries found mentioned in the hand writing of the workman on certain documents of the bank . But that will not entitle him to be declared as a clerk as possibilities cannot be ruled out that the workman might have performed that job in his own hand writing of his own without orders ofthe seniors in this regard with a view to improve hi claim in future. It is settled legal position that ifany work is performed without the orders of the competent authority by any person under service rules that will not entitle hiw for any kind of service benefits . In the joint inspection 6. Both contesting parties have led oral as well as JO GAZETTE OF INDIA

6274

report it has been found that entries on d date 3-1-1-01 15-1-01 , 18-01-01.01 . 27-01-101 , ( 19-02-01、16-02-01 and 17-02-01 ein the hand writing of the workman and it is als im the joint inspection report that the record fortid 18-01-02 10 28-02-02 was not made available as the same was not table . Certain vouchers have si be ミリ inpected to Cutton period to find out as to winder the worktum hompleted 2-10 days of contunda not . The vouches which have been inspected te for the period an 1 to 26-02-02 which certainly goesto preve the fact tha workinan has worked for now the 240 days of continutes service under the opposite parte bank .

31 the wibunat after giving anxious consideration to thements of the workman in the light of 15 evidence tanishme juint inspection report is of the contizmed opinion that even if it is proved that the worknica Itas completed fer more than 240 days of continuous services as has been established by the joint inspection even then he cannot be gwen any benefit of the same as tiesta will have te ne considered as to whether the pres istons of the Indhusta:: .: Disputes Act , 1947. are applicable in his Cine and as to whether his case falls within the defimmen el retrenchment as has been defined under Section Too ) of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 , ог пот .

12. 1 appreciate the point merels predings. evidence and arguments led by the workman is trot sulfierem without appreciation of the pleadings , evidence and args of the opposite party. The car of the urgument of the management is that the appointment engagement the workman is prima face ils no officer of ti . Matik is entuled to appoint any per bank wider following regular selection prov this argumised in the light of the position de risprudence , the trift. 4. force in the guments of the opposite pa Therefore, when the appointment or the engag the ben leeal the case tarde is no secordance with the service rules, workang ass of the workman even for of 2-10 days mas be not help 10 him for the proses of inviting the pensions of the Industrial Disputes Ac . 1947 Also more to say that it is the specilie case of the opposite party bank But there never esisted any relansso anaster awal sant between the parties the mu concerted cannot be covered under the dut workman as detined under Section 2 ( s ) of the Act. f tire. in this viewof end is held by the tribuna ! ... the prosons of Industrial Disputes Act are not appien thes of the workman , therefore , he cant held सह y rend whatsoever .

Merepasentative for the management. 1. emed send "da, in oppert of their case but all that ail are cypressed above hence is saea the preser

. :

1518 29.2008 / AGRAHAYANS 1930 PART --S . 3

יי

246 days of continues samplesment and it it is found that his initial engagement or employment is void ab- initio he cannot be hell entirical for the relief claimed by him.

14. Pin pomme ? attsammen of the tribunal was drawn towards settlement a ? 6-10-92 . document nos . 143 to 14/5 avilable on the record of the case, arrived at between the managemem of Punjab & Sindh Bank and their workman, by the authorized representative for the workman and it has been argued by hiem that the case of the workman clearly falls within the ambit of the settlement hence he should be granted reiset of remstatement for the grounds mentioned in his stay at claim . Of course , there is neither any pleadings ans evidence on behalf of the workman nor there is any rebuttal by the opposite party bank yet the tribunal after going through the provisions ofthe setterment funds that according to clause of the settlement it is provided . that those employees who have completed 240 days in the preceding 12 months to be reckoned from the date of last served or in any other block of 12 consecutive months commencing from 15-04-80. Their inter- se seniority would be determined, on the basis of day on which they worked first as temporary employee as per banks available record . The settlement further provides thatother employees not falling in the above category hut have at least worked tor 90 days from 01-01-82 . The arguments advanced by the representative cannot be given any favour according to the awn claim of the workman when it is the specific case of the workman that he entered in the services of the hand for the first time in the year 1990 , There is clear cut mention of cut of date 15-04-80 . ирон whom the provisions of the above seulement are applicable and also it has been provided that persons it least have worked for 90 days from 01-01-82 only their cases the provisions of settlement are applicable and not otherwise.

IS. When the case is exanuned on the light of the above provisions it is quate obvious that he for the first time entered in the services of the bank as claimed by him without any appointment letter or without exercise of selection process in the year 1990 lt is true that the candidates falling under the settlement , in their case , the point whether they have been appointed after selection process or not has been redundant. What was required was that they should cuts the condition laid down in the above settlement A. is the own case of the workman that he entered in the wines of the opposite party bank in the year 1990 , therefore , the provisions of the said settlement is not applicable in his case and therefore, he cannot be allowedan: benefit of the same . From this point of view the workmans entitled for any reliefon accoun of the settlement date ! 10-110-92

16. Be that as it is settled provison of law that pleading not pleaded inthe plaint or statement of claim and no evidene on the pois has been given by any party cannot be arguedat sol arguments and courts are not 6275

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

bound to consider those arguments considering the same outside the scope of the case file . In the instant case no such pleadings or evidence on the point of settlement have been raised by the workman in his support , therefore, he cannot be held entitled for any kind of benefit out of settlement dated 16-10-92.

17. Accordingly for the discussions recorded above , it is held that the workman is not entitled for any relief as claimed by him as he has palpably failed to establish the fact that his employment was in accordance with the prescribed recruitments rules , therefore, his working more than 240 days cannot improve his case at all and that the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , are not applicable in his case.

18. Lastly the reference is bound to be answered in favour of the opposite party and against the workman . Ordered accordingly .

R. G. SHUKLA , PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2008

का.आ. 3140,- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार , बैंक ऑफ बड़ौदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बौच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम मंत्रालय , कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 33/2003 एवं 13/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-10-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12011 / 122/2003- आई आर ( बी -11 ) ] और [सं. एल-12011/ 163/2004- आई आर ( बी-11 ) ]

राजिन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st October, 2008

S.O. 3140.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 33/2003 and 13/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour Court , Kanpur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Bank of Baroda and their workmen, received by the Central Government 31-10-2008, оп

[No. 1-1201 1 / 122/2003 - IR( B-1 [) ] and [No. L- 12011/ 163/2004- IR(B - II ) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI RG SHUKLA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT, KANPUR Industrial Dispute No. 13 of 2005 and 33 of2003 In the matter of dispute between-

The Deputy General Secretary

U.P. Bank of Baroda Empls . Union C/ o Bank ofBaroda Block Kidwai Nagar , Kanpur

AND

TheGeneral Manger Bank of Baroda BarodaCorporate Centre C-26, G Block , Bandra Kurla Complex Bandra ( E) Mumbai.

AWARD

1. Central Government , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi vide notification No. L- 12011 / 163/2004 -IR ( B - II ) dated 21-04-2005 ( in 1.D. No. 13 of2005) and also vide notification No. L- 12011 / 122/2003 - IR(B - II ) dated 23-09-2003 has referred the following dispute to this tribunal for its adjudication-

2. In 1.D. No. 13 of 2005 schedule of reference is to the effect that whether the action of the mangement of Bank ofBaroda in not regularizing the services of41 workers mentioned in the Annexure A enclosedby union vide representation dated 01-09-2003 and not allowing them facilities/benefits as per Bipartite Settlement, is justified and legal ? If not to what relief the workmen concerned are entitiledto?

3. In L.D. No. 33 of2003 schedule of reference is to the effectwhether the action ofthe managemnet ofBank of Baroda in not regularizing the services of S/Sh. Ramveer Singh, Raj Mohan Bajpai , Awadhesh Kumar, Hari Kishan , Preadeep Kumar Singh , Prabhakar Tripathi , Ajai Pal Singh , Ram Parkash, Surya Prakash Tiwari , Sinil Kumar Samant, Daya Ram Verma and Ravi Shanker Verma from the date of their appintment is legal and justified ? Ifnot what reliefthe concerned workmen are entitiled to?

4.As common question of law and facts are involved in the above industrial dispute cases , therefore , it is proposed to dispose ofthem by means ofthis common award .

5. It is not necessary to give full details ofthe case as after the exchange of pleadings between the contesting parties when the case was taken up for hearing 19-08-2008 at camp Lucknow, the representative for the union moved an application to the effect that the union do not want to press the above cases as a settlement on absorption of temporary employees has been arrived at between the union and the management of Bank of Baroda. The representative for the union has also filed copy of the settlement before the tribunal . The representative for the management has not objected to it .

6. Therefore, both the I.D. Cases are being disposed off as withdrawn having regard to the request of the representative for the union and in terms of settlement, a copy ofwhich shall form part of this award.

R.G. SHUKLA , PresidingOfficer 6276

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA NOVI MIR 24. 2008 /AGRAHAYANA 8. 1930

बैंक ऑफ बड़ौदा Bank of Baroda

BCC : BR 100

24th March.2008 CIRCULAR LETTER TO ALL BRANCHES OFFICES IN INDIA

Issued By

Baroda Corporate Centre . HRM Dept. , Mumkin Dear Sir,

Re: Tripartite settlemem dated 18-03-2008 Section 12 : 3 ) of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 between the management of Bank of Baroda and All India Bank of Baroda ample.co Federation Recongised Uriong hetore the Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Centah , Muunbai in the matter of absorption of canal temporary Peons Sweepers .

We are pleased to inform you that the issue relatung to absorption of casual temporary Peons Sweepers ligs been resolved by signing a Tripartite Settlement with the All India Bank of Baroda Employees Federation (recognized unioni in presence of Dy . Chiel Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , Mumbai under Section 12t3301 Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 A copy of the said tripsatne Settlement dated 18-03-20008 is enclosed for your information , record and reference.

Detailed operatne guidelines on the modalities of absorption, wherever applicable . would be communicated through concerned Regional Head .

Yours faithfulis .

(DIPANKAR MOOKERJIC General Manager ( FIR & Marketing Enchiara .

pkpn -or circulants settlement makija

Case No. 7(1 )2008.Ε . 1 Memorandum of settlement arrived at between the management of Bank of Baroda and their workmen represented by All India Bank of Baroda Employees ' Federation (Recognised Union) under , Section 12 ( 3 ) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 during the course of conciliation proceedings held on 18th March , 2008 before the Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , Mumbai .

SHORTRECHALOFTHE CASE

TheAll India Bank of Baroda Employees Federation Mumbai , ( hereinafter referred to as "the Federation ) vide its letter dated 28th January . 2008 , raised an Industrial Dispute against the Management of Bank of Baroda . Mumbai , over the issue ot'absorption of casual temporary persons working as Peons Sweepers and requested the Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner ( Central ) , Mum , 10 intervene in the matter for resolution of the dispute . Ehe matter was seized in conciliation by the Deputy (Chief Labour Commissioner ( Central) . Mumbai and conciliation

PART 11 - Sec. 3 ( in proceedings were held on 30th January , 2008 and onwards on different dates .

In course of the discussions conciliation proceedings , ittranspired that :

(a) The branches offices engaged temporary.casual persons during the leave absence vacancies of permanent Peon Sweeper without following prescribed rules gandelines of the Bank Over a period of titne suci temporary casual engagernent of persons continued for longer duration giving rise to deniand by the Federation for their absorption . As it was an industry - wide phenomenon , the Government of India, atter examination.carne out with an "Approach Paper for absorption of sul teamporary casual persons. In terms of the said " Approach Paper " . 647 temporary Peons Sweepers who had worked for 90 or more days between Ot - 01-1982 and 31-12-1989 were absorped in Bank's service im the year 1995,

(b) Even after absorption of such casual: temporary persons , engagement of casual temporary persons as Peon sweeper al various branches offices of the Bank had continued necessitating the Bank to renew the matter for resolving the issue .

(c) The Bank has suced a Tripartite Seulement in 20-02-2008 under Section 12 ( 3 ) of the Industrial Disputes Act.1447 before the Assistant Labour Commissioner Central . Kolkata with Bank gi Baroda Karmachari Sanity . Paschim Banga (affiliated to recognized AlBOBEFJ . Eastern Regional Council of Bank of Baroda Employees' Association (BEFpand Bank of Baroda Eastern States Employees Association (AIBEA ) , in the matter of abolition of Cameen Boy System and absorption of temporary casual persons who are sponsored by Employment Exchange engaged as Full Time/ Part tune Canteen Boy Sweeper .

(d) The All India Bank of Baroda Employees Federation is the recognized majority Union and sole collective hargaining agent for workmen in the Bank . Further . the Tripartite Seulement dated 1st September . 1973 provides that agreement on all India issues , except the wages and service conditions , which are settled at industry level, are to be reached with the All India Bank of Baroda Employees ' Federation.

(e) The issue was discussed threadbare , both bilaterally between the Federation and the Management of the Bank and also in course of the conciliation proceedings held on several dates and after protracted discussions held on 18-03-2008 before the undersigned, hoth the parties agree to settle the dispute on the following Terms of Seulement .

Now. it is hereby agreed and declared by and between the partieshereto as under : - भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29 , 2008/ अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT :

This Settlement will be applicable to all branches/ offices of the Bank in India and shall come into force immediately subject to the terms and conditions mentioned hereunder:

1.The Canteenboy system, wherever in existence in the Bank, is abolished and henceforth , no Canteen Boy will be recruited/ engaged either on permanent basis or on casual /temporary basis.

2. Subjectto Clause 3 , Casual / temporary Peons/ Sweepers shall be absorbed in Bank's service in phased manner as under :

Phase - 1:

The following category of casual/ temporary Peons/ Sweepers willbe absorbed in Phase- I before 30th June , 2008.

(a ) Casual /temporaty Peons /Sweepers who had worked for 90 or more days between 1-1-1982 and 31-12-1989 and are stillworking.

(b) Casual /temporary Peons / Sweepers who had worked for 90 or more days between 1-1-1990 and 31-12-1990 and are still working.

Phase- [ ]:

Casual/temporary Peons/Sweepers who have worked for 240 days or more in consecutive- 12-monthsbetween 1-1-1991 and 29-2-1996 and are still working will be absorbed in Phase- Il during the financial year 2008-09.

Phase-111 :

Casual/temporary Peons/Sweepers who have worked for 240 days or more in consecutive - 12- months between 1-3-1996 and 28-07-2007 and are still working will be absorbed in Phase - ill during the financial year 2009-10.

3. Absorption of casual / temporary Peons/Sweepers willbe in phases , as above and will be subject to the following conditions :

(a) Casual/temporaty Peons/ Sweepers should fulfill the eligibility criteria viz . age and qualification as on the first date of engagement in the Bank.

(b) Found medically fit for recruitment in Bank's service.

(c) Absorption shall be with prospective effect i.e. from the date mentioned in the letter of absorption to be issued by the Competent Authority.

(d) Such casual/temporary Peons/Sweepers will be

6277 absorbed in their respective wage scale and on their absorption shall be fitted in the first stage of full time/part -time scale wages , as the case may be, viz. casual/ temporary persons working as 1/3rd, 1/2, 3/4th and Full -time Sweepers shall be absorbed as 1 / 3rd , 1/2 , 3 /4th and full - time Sweepers , respectively. However, the casuali temporary persons who are presently being engaged as Peon but had earlier worked as Full- time/Part - time Sweepers will be absorbed as "Sweeper- cum-Peon" as per requirement and at the sole discretion of the Bank.

(e) No arrears of wages salary , seniority or any other benefit shall accrue to such casual persons on their absorption and such casual /temporary persons shall not claim any such benefits for their past service/ engagement with the Bank as casual temporary person .

(f) Deployment/ placement of such casual/ temporary Peons/Sweepers on their absorption in Bank's service shall be at the sole discretion of the Management depending upon its requirement, within the State. However, Bank will endeavour to keep such displacement to the minimum as per requirement.

(g) Seniority of such casual/temporary Peons/ Sweepers , on absorption , shall be recknoned in their respective cadre/ scale wage from the date of their absorption in Bank's service.

(h) Absorption is subject to their good conduct and verification of their antecedents .

(i ) The concerned casual /temporary persons and/ or concerned employee's Organizations / Unions / Association shall withdraw all cases pending before the Conciliation Officer/ Labour Court Central Government Industrial Tribunal High Court/Supreme Court or any other Judicial authority.

4.Both the parties agreed that :

(a) The Government guidelines with regard to reservation of posts for SC, ST, OBC. etc. shall be applicable for absorption of casual persons.

(b) It is specifically agreed that all casual /temporary Peons /Sweepers , who are covered under this Settlement for absorption shali submit individual undertaking as per Annexure 'A' to this Settlement agreeing to the terms and conditions stipulated in Clause 3 above, before consideration of their PART 11 -Six: 3 (14) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29 , 2008 / AGRAHAYANA 8. 1930

6278

SIGNATORIES TO THE SETTLEMENT

Representatives ofAll India Bank ofBaroda Employees' Federation.

Representatives of Management of Bank ofBaroda.

Shri A.K.Jain President

Shri Dipankar Mookerjee General Manager ( THR &Marketing)

request for absorption . Any conditional undertaking or undertaking in any other format and/ or refusal to the order of placement deployment shallbe deemed as refusal to absorption by such concerned casualtemporary person wd in such an event their claim For absorption shall not be considered . thercaffer

Shri Mibod Nadkarni Cieneral Secretary

Shri J.D. Khanna Dy . General Manager (HRM& Adm ព .)

Stori Vinit Sasena Deputy General Secretary

Shri C.V. Chandrashekhar Dy. General Manager {HRnes. HRD & 1 [ .)

(c) Casual temporary Peons. Sweepers who are absorbed in Bank's service under this Settlement will be bable to be terminated from Bank's service in case it is found at any tome that he made kaise declaration in the undertaking as per Amevare "A" or be submitted false fake document supp ofhis coscatonal qualification, age, caste , en 、

Shri V.P. Mahajan Depins Cieneral Secretary

Shri Mukesh Gary Asstt . General Manager (HRM)

Shri K.J. Ramanathan Deputy General Secretary

Shri K.C. Pari Asstt . General Manager (11RM & IL)

Shri Pradeep K.G. Niyogi Senior Manager (HRM)

Shri R.G. Raum Deputy General Secretary Sluri Karumesh Shukla Font Secretary ( d) It is clearly understood that this Settlement will not be applicable to the persons engaged !! casual- temporary basis ufier 28-07-2007 or wh has tiot completed 240 days in a period at consecutive 12 months preceding 28-07-2007. Also , die Unies will not claim or file cases in repect of castuzi temporary persons who are working engaged at present and/ or not aberbed under Clause 2 above of this Settlement.

BEFOR! M1. (B.S. Pasa Conciliation Oflicer under Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 & Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner ( Central ) . Mun ประเ (e) The Bank may extend deter the process of absorption of casual temporary persons besond the time limit stipulated under Clause 2 above tur a maximum period of 90 days for cogent reasons and in stuch even the Federation will be consulted.

(1) Casual temporary persons who will be absurd uedet this Settlement will notbe eligible l promotion to Clerical cadre for a period of cars from the date of absorption .

WITNESSES: 1. SıraV.M. Sawant Asstt. Labour Commissioner (Cemral) 2. Shri Ganapati Bhatt Asstt . labour Commissioner ( L'enrah

The followingOffice Bearers of the All India Bank ol'Barwala kimployees Federation Recogimsed Uniondare signatory of this settlement .

5. All past and present claims / cases of casual temporary persons andor Employees Organizations are hereby resolved .

Shri N. B. Dandiwala . I'Twasurer

Shri M. 1. Shah General Secretary . Anand in !

6. Save and except tripartite Settlement da 20-02-2008 . his Settlement supersedes all previous understandingsagreements settlements / practices , f regional , zonal or otherwise and the Umons will not raise any issue /demand in respect of matters covered underthis settlement ,

Shri Shri Dilip Bratumblhau General Secretary , Alumedabad kut

Both the parties shall submit implementative rep

Shri V Ramakrishna,

within 30 days of the phase-wise time limit stipulated

Clause 2 of the Settlement with objection thereto, ilns

tailing which it will be construed that the tentos of this

General Secretary . A. P. I a Shri K. K. Verna General Secretary. Bahar & Harkhand Unit Settlement have been fully implemented .

[भाग -खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Shri Magan Patel. General Secretary, Baroda Unit

Shri Naresh Chaddha, President, Delhi Unit

Shri R. V. Keni , President, Goa Unit

6279

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29 , 2008 /अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

accept the terms and conditions mentioned therein .

I am covered under the said Settlement dated 18th March, 2008 for absorption in Bank's service as Peon/ ScaleWage Sweeper.

I am working as Casual Peon/full -time/part -time Sweeper in the Bank since tails of my casual/ temporary engagement is as under: De-

As Peoni Branch/Office From

Shri K. J. Funga, General Secretary, Karnataka

Shri Suresh Pai, General Secretary . Kerala Unit

Shri R. M Kudale , Secretary , Maharashtra Unit

Shri P.G.M. Panieker, General Secretary, MP & CG Unit

Shri Sudip Sen, General Secretary, Nagaland Unit

Shri Raj Sharma, General Secretary, Punjab Unit

Shri Subir Chatterjee, General Secretary , West Bengal Linit

Shri P. L.. Biswal , General Secretary, Orissa Unit

Shri A. R. Suryanarayanan, General Secretary, 7. N. 1. Unit

Shri John Peter. General Secretary , T. N I ! Unit

Shri Subir Chattcrice , General Secretary. West Bengal Unit

Shri Ashok Varma, Jt. Secretary

Shri K. K. Kotian, Jl . Secretary Shri N. Venugopal , Jt. Secretary

ANNEXURE "A" The Competennı Authority , Bank ofBaroda,

DearSir,

Re: Undertaking in terms of Clause 4(b) of the Settlement dated 18th March , 2008 on Absorp- tion of Casualtemporary persons engaged as Peon/Full- time/Part - time Sweeper

Ihave read and clearly understood the provision of the Settlement dated 18th March , 2008 and do hereby 433562/08-1

To Total no. of days

St.

PTS/ FTS No.

1 .

I am enclosing herewith the following documents. in original , along with 2 attested copies of the same in support of my age , educational qualification , caste , etc.:

I hereby submit undertaking that :

(a) I shall not claim /demand any benefit whether monetary or otherwise from ' the Bank ' relat- ing to my casual/temporary engagement in the Bank for the period prior to the dare of my absorption in Bank's service before any Authority/ Court , in future.

(b) I shall not raise any dispute before any Au- thority/ Court relating to my placememide- ployment on absorption in Bank's service .

(c) En case subsequent to my absorption in Bank's service, if it is found that declaration made with regard to period of engagement is found to be false or any of the documents submitted by me in support of age , qualifica- tion , caste, etc. , is false/ fake forged, I will be líable to be terminated from Bank's service.

I am submitting this irrevocable undertaking after fully understanding the provisions ol the aforesaid Settlement dated 18th March. 2008, and implication thereof.

Yours faithfully, 6280

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA

MHER 29,2008/ AGRAHA 10

reported at the puse doty ( 1 28-09-09 but the then brancin नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2000x

manager didmenischarge inseatics and

verbal instructions that hutcert. then

detentuined with 28-409-99, has also been

satinof alleged by the app det at the time of

his services he want artistice notice

retrenchiment cerclere, the eispensatera

of his service by theary is not ng but an illegal

retrenchment in provisings of Tidustris !

का. . 3141, औद्योगिक विवाद भय 1947 : ( 1947 का 14 ) को धारा के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय एण्ड सिंध बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उन्हे कर्मकारों के बोच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में भी सरकार औद्योगिक अभिकरण श्रम न्यायालय कानपुर के उतार (संदर्भ सं. 91/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय एक को 31-10-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Disputes Act , 19 commit has been pray

he be reinstate

सं. पुल 12012/88/2000- आई -11 ]

full back way

राजिन्द्र कुमार, हवितरी

consequential be...:

New Dellat . the 31st October ,2005

heen vehemently ppesite pains by film,

detailed reply we hasnecapheded by ther.. that ne

cause of action is alleged that the

has been retretmake

is incorreer , that:

of the opposite par

dispensationof

termination d :

S.O. 3141. In pursuance of Sechen 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government bereby publishes the award ( Ref . N... 1.2000 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal Labour Court , Kanpur as shown the Annexure , ir fasteial Dispute between the employers in relatosthe management of Putnab & Sindh Bank and kun which was received by the Cenira ! Goverment on 31-10-2008.

relationship . "..

opposite party 12 .

presumed that

[No 1-12012 : 8-11 ) RAJINDER KUMARINT

ever terminated .. dr allegea co ANNEXURE

the applicant w

peun as claimed lact me appl BEFORE : SRI. RG SIIUKLA. PRESIDIENNAKER

engaged as a cac 15-4-99 by the opposine CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRUI .

party at their Hag Branch at Kompe and the

applicant was poes on the basis of day to d TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT SEM BHAVAN ATI CAMPUS UDYOG NAGAR

work; that it is

1. D. No. 91/2000

ever denied to - the opposite it

is also denied het . patig thu the applica

retareed from the branchina Sri Rajndra Prasad Mashra Son of Sri Surat Prasar! Mistura Through Talsi Pam 116/14 , Rawalpur Village

opposine party that his seviye been And

terminated , tha tules sad regulat

providing requi ן.וויייי

The Semor Manager Punjah & Sindh Batis 1 . Harzendia Nagar . Kanpur

of the opposite the applica ad ane

subjected thro prosess the he ne AWARD

no legal right inf em in the serves ! the

opposite pen Lesof the same this licet

claimed that ...

1 Central Government MOL., New Delites noulication No 1-17012-88-2000 IR ( B - 11 ) ce -200L has reterred the following dispute for aduudiste this tribunal.

no merit in daily rated emp! ...

5 The 1 new has been alreasts picades. trends in which nothing

sender 2.Whether the action of the thannagens pare & Sindh Bank in terminating the services Prasad Mishra .. 28-9-99.is legal and just what rehet the concerned workman is ert : 1ed

..... الدعامmgs retagen CON

hoth parties have Gesnery evalen.c

as well as

of their respeеса.

adduced oral c

7. 1 have

parties at lengih gese througi tie records

ofthe case carehlis

3. The case in short as set up by the voreran in his claim statement is that he was engaged on the boral instructions of the opposite party to . 2 ( hipeon in the year 1008 at the rate of Rs . 1200 per send that having regard to the work and conduct of tise opposite party enhanced the rate of his wages at R1350 per mouth . It is further alleged by the app at the on the [ भाग ।।- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

6281

भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

8.Now first ofall it will be seen as how far the worionan has been able to establish his claim for his reinstatement . The workman in his evidence has categorically admited the fact that he was neither issued any appointment letter пог any written order by means ofwhich his services stands terminated. It has also come in evidence that he was never paid his wages as was being given by the opposite party to their regular and permanent employee. It has also come in the evidence of the workman that an application was invited from through the branch manager of the branch but at this stage it may be point out that no officer of the bank is empowered to engage any employee without undergoing through regular and permanent selection process and any appointment made by any officer ofthe bank it can safelybe held that such appointments are by way ofback door entry.

9. Workman has also filed certain documents in support of his clairu but a perusal of the same would go to indicate that they are not sufficient to improve the claim of the workman in any manner or to prove that the workman hadever completed 240 days of continuous service within the incaning ofSection 25B ofthe Act. Even the workman in his pleading or in his evidence has not stated anything regarding breach of any of the provisions governing the service conditions of the employees of the bank, therefore , the provisions of the act cannotbe applied as a straight jacket formula for claiming relief under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , by simply stating that the provisions of the Act have been breached in the case of the workman .

10. The position that no one can claim appointment inpublic employment on the strength that he had rendered certain days of service either on casual basis, temporary basis or ad-hoc basis has finally been set at naught in the leading case of Smt . Uma Devi by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, wherein it has clearly held that a casually , daily rated employee , temporary employee or even an ad- hoc employee has not right to claim employment or absorption in service unless he has been selected through regular selection process under recruitment rules .

11. In view of above position when the claim ofthe workman has not been found within the purview of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act ,it cannot be held that the services of the workman had been terminated by the opposite party bank at any point of time and being so when the claim of the workman fails from his own pleadings, evidence there remains hardly any need to discuss the pleadings and of the opposite party bank.

12. Thus from the discussions made above, it is held that the provisions of ID Act are not at all applicable in the case of theworkman and if it is so it cannot be held that the opposite party have flouted any of the provisions of the Act and being so the workman cannot be held entitled for grant ofrelief as claimed by him .

R.G SHUKLA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 3 नवम्बर , 2008

का. आ. 3142.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार आर्मी स्कूल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केंन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. -2 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 1256/2006) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-14012 /12/ 2005- आई आर (डीयू) । अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 3rd November, 2008 S.O. 3142.-10 pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 1256/ 2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , No. II Chandigarh , as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Army School and their workman, which was received by the Central Government 0 3-11-2008. n

[No. 1.-14012/ 12/2005- IR( DU ) ] AJAY KUMAR , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- IL, SECTOR 18- A, CHANDIGARH

SHRI KULDIP SINGH PRESIDING OFFICER: Case 1. D. No. 1256// 2K6 Registered on : 16-2-2006 Date of Decision : 16-10-2008

Shri Sita Ram Son of Shri Chait Singh το House No. 344, Dhiru ki Majri , Patiala. ...Petitioner

Versus

The Principal , Army School , 40 , Baradari , Patiala. ...Respondent

APPEARANCE

FortheWorkman: Messrs K. L.. Behl and Gurdip Singh , Advocates

For the Management : Mr. M. R. Dhiman , A. R. AWARD

The workman is not present. Mr. Gurdip Singh representative of the management is present. He states that the parties have compromised in the case as well as in all matters pending between them at uiffèrent forums . llc has placed on record certified true copies ofthe application of the workanan , his statement and that of the order of Presiding Officer , Labour Court Patiala. The combined reading of these documents show that the parties had litigation in different courts, and that the workman has received Rupees 25,000 compensation as full and final settlement of all his claims against the management. The 6282

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29, 2008/ AGRAHANAN

workman is not present to deny this fact . It is to be present that the workman is absent as his claim has been erk Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide recit Order No. L- 14012/ 12/ 2005 - IR ( DU ) dated the 26an December , 2005 referred the following dispute for the adjudication of this Tribunal:

Whether the action of the management of the A School , Patiala in terminating the services of Suri Sita Ram, Ex-Mali wc.f. 14-9-2004 without complying with the provisions ofSections 25-1 ,G. and the I. D. Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If notwe relief the workman is entitled to and from stat de On a notice of reference , the parties app ! filed thear pleadings and supported the same we we affidavit of workman and of Gurdeep Singh 1.DC the management . They also placed on record photo conce a number of documems , some at their own and see u the application ofthe workman. The matter was to besidd for the evidence of the workman when he presen developinent has taken place . So far there has com evidence on record to suport the claim of the workin which has been denied by the management . Sucethe workman has chosen not to appear in the case and there is nothing to doubt the claim of the management partje! have settled the disputes at their own , Indoo evidence on record to suppon the claim of the workin The fore, there is nothing to show that the tusmager had terminated the services of the workman in v de t provisions efSection 25 -F, Gand Rof the ID Act, 1994 " as is not entitled to any relief. The award is passed hing in these terms .

Let the copy of the award be sent to the Apps, Pate government for necessary action and the file he consid to records after due completion .

KULDIP SINGH . Presiding Bicer नई दिल्ली, 3 नवम्बर, 2008

का. आ. 3143.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1 ( 1947 का 14 ) को धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कथन। व बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्यागिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिस्सा चण्डीगढ़ के पचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 16.02k5 ) को प्रकाशित कर्ण है केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-11 2608 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. गल-22012/304 / 1997- आई अस अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Deltu,the 3rd November . 2008 S.O. 3143. la pursuance of Section 17 the Industrial Dispures Act. 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Conhal Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 13 2k5) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum Labour Coun , Chandigarh , as shown in the Aumexure in the Industrial Dispore between the employers in relacion to the management of FC and their workman , which was receivedby the Central tiovernment on 3-11-24008

No. 1-22012.304 1997 - ik( CI!!! AJAY KUMAR GAUR. Desk inDicer CENTRALGOVERS RODM AM CUM-LABOURETOR B

Gli PRESIDINGOFFICE ! . :

Case 1. D. No. 163:2k

Registered on: 1-8-20

DateofDecision : 16-10-23

Shri Jatinder So of Noi Nogaro Van Garh Det find ...Petitioner District Manager . FCI..

For the Workman

For the Managemen

TheMitustry ofta memorandia , the foilowing disputarit.ne vide their No. 1.-220

"Whether thegioisi Corporation of Rojak in dispensing the services of Shrimanwef5-19in just and legalewhat relief the sirk entitled to ?

The partes also tenderecipersenthey desis The notice of the given to the parties who appeared thronged and fled door respective claims in th .. care of temen saliti d reply of the management placed or photo copies ofa number ofmes in support of their clam to produce in the cases .

did not appear for his sagat tien the day iteas The case was bength the evscience of the workman and the reconstat the sorku given chance to produce heaven before this he did not attend the case perenang say nghe 11-10-2007. Uitumarette was se vide postal receipt No. 28.1.2008 teaber ke noree sem has been met back unsorted noe de workman has appearedne his case. This showe that he has fest interests support of his clam of bis case ad agement buddispois.l with his services w.e.f. sad their action was wys and illegal. the works produced any evides e The managemem had claiau on toto , duly supported by the affidwar wuress therefore , dis workman is not ently rebet. The relereneis answered against humas par set .

Let the copy of netive Approp government for necessary actes and the file be consommed to records after due coupe ..

KUTLAPSENCEI. Presdmg Ollicer भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2003/ अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[ भाग [[-खण्ड 3( ⅱ) ]

नई दिल्ली, नवम्बर , 2008

का. आ. 3144.- औद्योगिक दिचाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में कंन्द्रीय सरकार नाजिम दरगाह ख्वाजा साहिब , अजमेर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय अजमेर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/35/99 -आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 3rd November, 2008 S.O. 3144. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Cerral Governmeat hereby publishes the award of the Industrial Tribunal Labour Court , Ajmer as shown in the Armexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Najim Dargah Khawja Sahab, Ajmer and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 3-11-2008,

[No. L-42012/35/99 - IR ( DU ) ] AJAY KUMAR , Desk Officer

अनुबंध

न्यायालय श्रम एवं औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण , अजमेर( राज. ) पीठासीन अधिकारी श्री मिथिलेश कुमार शर्मा, आरएचजेएस

प्रकरण संख्या-सीआईटीआर 08/01 [रेफरेंस नं. एल-42012/35/99 -आईआर ( डी यू) दिनांक 22-5-01 ]

कैप्टन पो. कालू खां भदार टेकरी , कुंदननगर , अजमेर ( राज. )

...प्राथी

बनाम

नाजिम , दी नाजिम दरगाह ख्वाजा साहिब , अजमेर

... अप्राश्री उपस्थितः श्री पी.डी. खन्ना , अधिवक्ता , प्रार्थी ।

श्री वी.डी. भार्गव , अधिवक्ता, अप्रार्थी ।

6283 retrenchment Compensation is just and valid? ifnot what relict the workman is entiled to?

2- प्राथी पक्ष ने अपने क्लेम के विवरण में अंक्ति किया है कि उसका सेवा समाप्ति आदेश दि. 24-4-95 को निरस्त किया जाकर उसी दिनांक से निरंतर स्थाई कर्मचारी के वतनमान के पद पर नियमित मानते हुए वेतनमान व पिछले वेतन सहित सभी भत्तों तथा कोसीक्वेंशिलय लाभ के साथ। 8 प्रतिशत व्याज सहित रॉस्टेट करने के आदेश को मांग की है . साथ ही समय -समय पर स्थायी वेतनमान में की गयी बढ़ोत्तरी का एरियर सहित तथा व्याज , मुकदमें का खर्चा व अन्य राहत जो उचित हो भी दिलवाने की मांग की है। क्लेम में संशोधन व परिर्वतन के अधिकार को भी सुरक्षित रखने का निवेदन किया है क्योंकि प्रार्थी की नियुक्ति अप्रार्थी के अधीन जमादार के पद पर दि.10-7-93 को जरिये नियुक्ति पत्र हुई थी जिसमें उसे स्थाई वेतन 240 रु. प्रतिमाह देना अंकित किया है । आगे अंकित किया है कि उसने ईमानदारी से लगातार 24-4-95 तक ड्यूरी दी तब दिनांक 21-2-94 को उमका स्थानातंरण रिसेप्शनिस्ट गरट हाऊस के पद पर कादिश। आगे अंकित किया है कि अप्रार्थी ने अचानक्त दि.24-4-95 को बिना किसी काण बिना किसी जांच के अबंध रूप से सेवायें समाप्त कर दी और बकाया तनख्वाह 1775 रु . का चैक प्रार्थी को दे दिध्य। आगे अंकित किया है कि उसने सेवा समाप्ति को अपील अध्यक्ष को की थी किंतु आश्वासन देते रहे और अपील पर आज तक आदेश नहीं करना भी वताया है। आगे अंकित किया है कि प्रार्थी ने अप्रार्थों की पोल खोल रखी थी जो अप्रार्थी को बर्दाश्त नहीं रहो थो इस कारण से उसे सेजा से बर्खास्त करना बताया है । अंद में प्राथर्थी ने स्वयं के संत्रा- मुक्ति आदेश को आई.डी एकट की धारा 25 एफ , जी , का उल्लंघन बताते हुए, कोई वरिष्ठता सूची नहीं निकालने, व बारह माह में 2410 दिन तक कार्य करने के कारण चुनौती देना अंकित किया है । अंत में प्रार्थी ने स्त्रयं को सेवा समाप्ति से बेरोजगार होना भी बताया है।

दिनांक: 23-9-18

अवार्ड

1. केंद्र सरकार द्वारा प्रेषित विवाद निम्न प्रकार है:-

Whether the management ofNajim Dargah Khawja Sabab is an Industry under sec 2 (j ) of the I.D. Act , 1947 If so whether the action of Najım Dargah Khawja Sahab Ajmer in terminating the Services of Capt Mohd Kalu Khan ( Retd) Ex receptionist Guest House and security Incharge without payment of 3. अधार्थी पक्ष ने अपने जवाब में प्रार्थी पक्ष द्वारा क्लंम में उल्लिखित तथ्यों का खंडन करते हुए प्रार्थी के क्लेम को खारिज कर अवार्ड अप्रार्थी के पक्ष में पारित करने का निवेदन किया है क्योंकि प्रार्थों की नियुक्ति बतौर जमादार निश्चित चंतन पर पूर्णतया अस्थाई रूप से की गयी थी, प्रार्थी के खिलाफ कई शिकायतें रिश्वत लेने , काऊंटर पर रिफंड नहीं लौटाने आदि की थी। आगे अंकित किया है कि प्रार्थी को सेनाधुक्ति विधि अनुसार जरिये चैक 1775 रु. भुगतान करके दि.24-4-95 को करना बताया गया है । आगे अंकित किया है कि प्राथों के खिलाफ कई शिकायतों के कारण अप्रार्थी संस्थान की बदनामी हो रही थी। आगे अंकित किया है कि आई.डी. एक्ट के प्रावधान प्रार्थी के भामले में लागू नहीं होते । त्रिशेप कथन में अंकित किया है कि अप्रार्थी संस्थान धार्मिक चेरिटेबल है जो बिना लाभ कं कार्य करती है इसलिए वाणिज्यिक श्रेणी में नहीं आने से आई.डी. एक्ट के प्रावधान लागू नहीं होने से स्वंय को इंडस्ट्री की परिभाषा में नहीं आने के कारण, प्राथी के क्लेम को मय खर्च निरस्त करने की अंत में प्रार्थना की है।

4. उपरोक्त क्लेम तथा जवाच पर दोनों पक्षों को सुना गया. पत्रावली का अवलोकन किया गया। विद्वान अभिभावक प्रार्थी को 6231

3 ) 2005

२२ ऑफ राज :

12725 एफ जिसक

कथा में बहाल उस्ने ::

उसका पदल्याए

सेवायें संबंध

अधिकारों का יין :

*****- છે? ???? છે ઃ

2004 ई है .

25240

यह त्वचा है कि

34 ???? ?????? ???? ડગંજ મેં છછક્ષ

८. विद्वान अभिभाषक

છે? - **

गयी

उद्योग माने

में नहीं है , उस पर

चाती है और इस आधार

समर्थन में नह

છે ???? સ્વ- * , *

किन उसके विरुद्ध विभिन्न

आश्रित कमरों को मंदी

नहीं क

न्यांलयों का दिया गया । ...

पार्थ के द्वारा शिवाक और उप

র্মশন

हुए स्वीकारांकित

का सेवा पृथ्थक्करण आदेश है । आर

अद्यार्थी

4. विद्वान अभिभाषकनिक

सांगिक विवाद अधिनिय

कर्मचारीप

नै उद्योग नहीं है । अप्रार्थी

फरक अपनी

पं वर्णित नहीं किया है तथा प्राथ

और भ्रष्टाचार के कारण

प्रशन कर म

3.THUS14:2444was5-

6. एफ. एल

गगनर सथा पृथक्करण आद

अन्य बनाद , 200 % [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

1. ए.आई. आर. 1956 ( एस.सी. ) पेज नं. 231 जे.के. आयरन और स्टील कं. लि. कानपुर बनाम आयरन एंड स्टील मजदूर यूनियन , कानपुर

2.1974 लैब आई.सी. 166 ग्लैक्सो लेबोरेट्रीज इंडिया लि. अलीगढ़ बनाम ग्लैक्सो स्टाफ एसोसिएशन व अन्य

- जिनमें यह स्पष्ट किया गया है कि श्रम न्यायालयों पर दीवानी न्यायालयों संबंधी तकनीकियां लागू नहीं होती हैं लेकिन फिर भी सामान्य सिद्धांतों को लागू करना चाहिए । 3. 2004 ( 4 ) डब्ल्यू. एल.सी. पेज नं. 357 श्रीमति कृष्णा खंडेलवाल बनाम स्टेट ऑफ राजस्थान

4. 2004 (4 ) डब्ल्यू एल.सी. 241 ए भंवरलाल बनाम गोखाराम व अन्य

जिनमें जो तथ्य अभिवचनों में नहीं हैं उसके संबंध में पेश की गयी साक्ष्य पर विचार नहीं करना चाहिए और न ही उस बिंदु पर बहस की अनुमति देने के संबंध में।

5. ए.आई.आर. 1966 पेज 1861 भगतसिंह व अन्य त्रनाम जसवंत सिंह।

-जो तथ्य बचाव में नहीं उठाया गया हैं , उस बिंदु पर पेश की गयो साक्ष्य निरर्थक माने जाने के संबंध में तथा राज, इंडस्ट्रियल रूल्स 1956 के नियम 10 ( बी ) का भी हवाला दिया है । 10. जबाबी बहस में विद्वान अभिभाषक प्रार्थों की यह भी दलील है कि जो तथ्य वैधानिक है उनकी अभिवचनों में वर्णित करने की आवश्यकता नहीं होती है और तथ्यात्मक बिंदुओं पर ही अभिवचन न्यायालय में प्रस्तुत किये जाते हैं , इस कारण अप्रार्थी उद्योग होने के संबंध में अभिवचनों में प्रार्थी द्वारा वर्णित नहीं किया जाना और इस संबंध में उठायी गयी आपत्ति असंगत माने जाने को दलील दी है 11. उपरोक्त दलीलों के संदर्भ में मैनें पत्रावली का अध्ययन किया तो पाया कि सर्वप्रथम इस न्यायालय द्वारा तय किया जाने बाला बिंदु यह है कि क्या मैनेजमेंट नाजिम ख्वाजा दरगाह साहिब धारा 2 (जे ) आई.डी. एक्ट के अंतर्गत उद्योग की श्रेणी में आता है?

12. इस संदर्भ में प्रार्थी की ओर से जो तथ्य अपने वलम वर्णित किये हैं, उनमें ऐसा कोई भी तथ्य वर्णित नहीं किया है जो यह स्पष्ट होता हो कि किन आधारों पर यह उद्योग की श्रेणी में आती है और इस संबंध में अप्रार्थी की ओर से जो आत्ति उठायी गयी है उसमें मुख्य आधार भी यह लिया गया है कि जो तथ्य प्रार्थी ने अपने क्लेम में वर्णित नहीं किया है , उस तथ्य की वैधानिकता का परीक्षण साक्ष्य के आधार पर नहीं किया जाये।

13. मैंने इस संदर्भ में अप्रार्थी की ओर से प्रस्तुत की गयी नजीर का अध्ययन किया तो यह प्रकट हुआ कि बिचाराधीन प्रकरण में मुख्य बिंदु जो इस न्यायालच के द्वारा तय किये जाने के लिए रेफार किया गया है , वह अप्रार्थी संस्थान उद्योग है या नहीं, ही मुख्य बिंदु है और उसी बिदु के संबंध में प्रार्थी के द्वारा अपने आधार क्लेम के रूप में दर्शाये हैं तथा जो जबाव अप्रार्थी द्वारा पेश किया गया है , वह भी उसी संदर्भ में पेश किया गया है । रेफरेंस में जो बिंदु महत्वपूर्ण है , वह

6285

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29 , 2008 / अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

अभिवचनों का अंग है और उसी के संबंध में तथ्य व साक्ष्य उभवपश्चों की ओर से पत्रावली पर पेश किये गये हैं । अतः मात्र क्लेम में अप्रार्धी संस्था उद्योग होने बाबत तथ्य वर्णित नहीं किये होने से प्रार्थी की ओर से प्रस्तुत साक्ष्य को निरर्थक मानना उचित प्रतीत नहीं होता है। इस संबंध में मेरे समक्ष प्रस्तुत की गयी नजीर का अध्ययन किया तो पायाकि ए, आई.आर. 1978 एस.सी. 548 की नजीर में यह सिद्धांत प्रतिपादित किया गया है कि: -

Industry" as defined in S.2 (1 ) has a wide Impo זו Wherethere is(1) Systematic activity ( in ) organized by Co-operation between employer and employee (the direct and substantial element is chinerical fiti ) for the production and/or distribution ofgoods and services calculated so satisfy human wanting and wishes (not spiritual or religious but inclusive of material things or services geared to celestial bliss e.g. making on a large scale prasad or food ) prima facie there is an Industry in that enterprise.

Absence of profit motive of gainful objective is imelevant be the vemare in the pubhe , jomt private or other sector .

The trac focus is farctional and the decisne test 15 the nature of the activity.

14. इस बिंदु के संबंध में जो साक्ष्य पत्रावली पर आयी है , उस बाबत अध्ययन से प्रकट होता है कि प्राथों कालू खां ने जो अपना शपथ पत्र प्रस्तुत किया है 'उसमें यह वर्णित है कि उसने अनार्थी के जवाब का जदाबुल जवाब प्रस्तुत किया जो प्रदर्श डब 3 है। संयुवन श्रम आयुक्त केंद्रीय ने दोनों पक्षों की वार्ता करवायी जो दि 27-11-98 को असफल हुई जो प्रदर्श डब 2 है और उसके आधार पर अधिमृच्चनः प्रदर्श डबः । इस न्यायालय में प्रस्तुत हुई। मैंने इस संदर्भ में प्रदर्श डन. 2 का अध्ययन किया तो पाया कि उक्त पत्र दि. 2711 98 में जां तथ्य वर्णित किये गये हैं उसमें ग्रार्थी को श्रमिक दर्शाया गया है और उसकी सेवा समाप्ति तथ्यों का विवेचन किया गया है और उक्त पत्र में अप्रार्थी की ओर से जो जवाब में तथ्य वर्णित किये गये थे , उनका विस्तृत त्रिलेञ्चन भी है । यह पत्र रेफरेंस प्रस्तुत करने में एक महत्वपूर्ण जांच का ही याधार है । इसके अलावा जो प्रार्थों की ओर से प्रदर्श डन. 3 प्रार्थना पत्र सहायक श्रम आयुक्त केंद्रांच , सिविल लाईन्स , अजमेर को भेजा गया है उसमें भी इन्हीं तथ्यों का विवेचन है और उका पत्र में प्रस्तुत से स्पष्ट होता है कि प्राधी के द्वारा जो तथ्य सहायक श्रम अ ३ प्रकट किये गये . वह उसको संत्रा शतों के संबंध में थं और अनाथ उतिष्ठान के कार्य को प्रकृति के संबंध में थे। 15. इसी संदर्भ में मैंने उभयपक्षों की ओर में प्रस्तुत की गयी साध्य का अध्ययन किया तो पाया कि अप्रार्थी की ओर से जो गवान पेश किये गये हैं उनमें गुना डब्ल्यू 1 शेर गौहम्मद ने अपने शपथ पत्र में यह कहा है कि दि. 30-7-94 को वह दरमाह गैस्ट हाऊस मं केयर टेकर व रिसेप्शनिस्ट के पद पर कार्यरत था और शंख अहमद निवासी मुंबई ने हमरा परिर्वतन के संबंध में प्रार्थी के विरुद्ध शिकायत की गयी थी उस समय ड्यूटी पर तैनात चतुर्थ श्रेणी कर्मचारियों ने जायरीन का नाम लेकर कहा कि पचास रुपये की रिश्वत लेकर -

:::

शपभ

: .

कि दर

सही के

हाऊस जाते

प्रबंधन नं

है और इस पर ए से जी

और

प्रकृति प्रदर

अप

pp ; છે ???????? ? ? ? ? *

છઃ સ્વઃ સ્વઃ

صلحة علية

गया जना

104

יליךזללה

शिकायत

उसको मकव

चामश्विन लेने

है उसमें

है कि

প্রিয়মে সক - বা সিকা

दि. 310 6287 [ भाग - खण्ड 3 ( ü) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 3, 1930

कि यह बात सही है कि शेर मोहम्मद ने जो मेरे खिलाफ 30-7-94 को शिकायत की थी , जो झूठी है जिसका मैंने जवाब दे दिया । यह सही है कि राधनपुर निवासी जैड. ए. चौहान ने मेरे खिलाफ रिश्वत लेने की शिकायत की थी जिस पर जवाब मैंने लिखित रूप में माजिम को दे दिया था । यह बात सही है कि रिश्वत लेने , पैसा हड़पने से संस्थान की बदनामी होती है । क्लेम के पैरा नं. 10 में ए से बी भाग मैंने सही लिखाया है ।

21. इसी संदर्भ में पैरा नं. 10 के ए से बी भाग का अवलोकन

किया तो उक्त भाग में :-

एम-12 मुस्ताक अहमद हारून का हस्ताक्षरयुक्त बयान है जिसमें यह वर्णित है कि श्री मुश्ताक अहमद हारून बराबर दरगाह शरीफ की जियारत करने अजमेर आया करते है और इसी गेस्ट हाऊस मेंक्याम करते हैं । इस इल्जाम से पहले कभी भी हारून हमाहब ने दरगाह अमले पर किसी तरह का इल्जाम आइद नहीं किया । मैंने जो रिपोर्ट की है बह बिल्कुल सही है किसी से अलन या बदले की भावना से प्रेरित होकर नहीं की गयी है व इसी तथ्य के समर्थन में मुश्ताक इब्राहिम-11 शेख मुकीम , सगीर अहमद , अब्दुल गफ्फार व मौहम्मद नवाल के बयान दर्ज किये गये हैं व एक अन्य शिकायत प्रदर्श एम-17 भी प्रार्थी के द्वारा की गयी अनियमितताओं के संबंध में है , जिस पर कार्यवाही वरिष्ठ अधिकारी द्वारा लेखबद्ध की गयी है । " बल्किप्रार्थी ने तो अप्रार्थी के सानिध्य में हो रही धांधलियों का पर्दाफाश किया था तथा अध्यक्ष, दरगाह कमेटी , अजमेर को लिखित में इनका हवाला दिया । अप्रार्थी ने प्रार्थी की शराफत का नतीजा उसको सेवा से मुक्त करके दिया । क्योंकि प्रार्थी ने अप्रार्थी की पोल खौल रखी थी ओ अप्रार्थी को बर्दाश्त नहीं हो रही थी । इसी कारण से अप्रार्थी ने प्रार्थों को सेवा से बर्खास्त किया । "

25. उपरोक्त तथ्यों से यह स्पष्ट होता है कि प्रार्थी के विरुद्ध जो शिकायत थी वह भ्रष्टाचार , कार्य के प्रति उदासीनता व अनियमितताओं के संबंध में थी, उसके संबंध में नोटिस भी जारी किये गये तथा उसका जवाब भी अप्रार्थी की ओर से दिया गया लेकिन जो तथ्य जिरह में उसने स्वीकार किये हैं, उसके विरुद्ध भ्रष्टाचार की शिकायतें थी और यह तथ्य भी स्वीकृत द्वथ्य है कि वह एक सेवानिवृत्त सैनिक है, जिसे नियमित पैंशन मिलती है , उसे नियत राशि पर कार्य करने के लिए नियुक्त किया गया था और उसके विरुद्ध की गयी शिकायतों के आधार पर जो उसे सेवा से पृथक किया गया है , उस संबंध में उसे एक माह का अग्रिप वेतन भी भुगतान किया गया है । अतः प्रार्थी के विरुद्ध आई भ्रष्टाधार व अनियमितताओं की शिकायतों को दृष्टिगत रखते हुए व इसके लिए उसे नोटिस भी जारी किये गये थे व उपरीक्त तथ्यों के विवेचन के आधार पर उसके सेवा पृथक्करण के आदेश में कोई अवैधानिकता नहीं पायी जाती है ।

26. जहां तक धारा 25 जी का प्रश्न है, प्राथी को ओर से ऐसा 22. इसी संदर्भ में एनएडब्ल्यू 3 मोहम्मद सिद्दीक का शपथ -पत्र पेश हुआ है जिसने अपने शपथ- पत्र के मद नं 2 में यह वर्णित किया है कि मेरे प्रभारी अतिधिगृह होने के समय प्रार्थी के संबंध में गेस्टहाऊस में ठहरने वाले जायरीनों द्वारा उनके दुर्व्यवहार के संबंध में श्री शेर मोहम्मद जो गेस्ट हाऊस में स्वागतकर्ता के पद पर कार्यरत था ने भी नाजिम, दरगाह कमेटी, अजमेर को शिकायतें की थी जिनके विषय में मेरे से भी पूछताछ की गयी थी । प्रार्थी के विरुद्ध श्री इब्राहिम खान , चपरासी ने भी शिकायत मुझे की थी । मैंने सभी शिकायतें नाजिम साहब के पास भेज दी थीं और जब इस गवाह से जिरह की गयी तो जिरह में यह कहता है कि प्रार्थी जमादार के पद पर अस्थाई रूप से नियुक्त हुआ था जहां से उसका स्थानांतरण स्वागतकर्ता के पद पर हुआ था और उस अवधि में वह इंचार्ज के पद पर कार्यरत था । जिरह में यह भी कहा है कि शेर मोहम्मद ने नाजिम को शिकायत किस तारीख को करी , उसकी तारीख तो मुझे याद नहीं है व अन्य शिकायतकर्ता के बारे में भी यह गवाह कहता है ।

कोई स्पष्ट तथ्य प्रामाणित नहीं कराया गया है जिससे यह प्रकट होता हो किकिसी कर्मचारी को उसके सेवा पृथक्करण के बाद लगाया गया हो याजिससे यह स्पष्ट होता हो कि किस कर्मचारी को कब सेवा में लगाया गया , कौन प्रार्थी से कनिष्ठ था तथा कौन वरिष्ठ है, किसकी नियुक्ति कब की गयी । अतः साक्ष्य के अभाव में धारा 25 जी औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम का उल्लंघन भी प्रार्थी पक्ष प्रमाणित नहीं कर पाया है । अंतः प्रार्थी किसी प्रकार का अनुतोष प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी नहीं है ।

आदेश

27. फलतः प्रस्तुत विवाद का उत्तर इस प्रकार से दिया जाता है कि प्रबंधन नाजिम दरगाह ख्वाजा साहिब धारा 2 ( जे ) आई. डी. एक्ट, 1947 के अनुसार उद्योग की श्रेणी में आता है । 23. इसी संदर्भ में मैंने संदर्भित शिकायतों का अध्ययन किया त्तो पाया कि प्रदर्श एम -5 जो प्रार्थी को जारी किया गया उसमें वर्णित हैकि राधनपुर निवासी जैड. ए. चौहान ने दिनांक 13-4-95 को यह शिकायत की कि उनके नाम से आरक्षित कमरे प्रार्थी ने उनको नहीं संभलाये । इसी संदर्भ में प्रदर्श एम -7 रिजर्वेशन रजिस्टर दिनांक 13-4-95 की प्रतिलिपि है जिसमें जैड ए, चौहान के नाम कमरा नं 41, 42 , 43 दर्शायं गये हैं ।

28. नाजिम दरगाह ख्वाजा साहिब , अजमेर द्वारा कैप्टन माहम्मद कालू खां( सेवानिवृत्त ) पूर्व-स्वागतकर्ता, गेस्ट हाऊस एवं सिक्युरिटी इंचार्ज को पूर्ण वेतन भय एक माह के अग्रिम वेतन के भुगतान सहित सेवा पृथक् करना उचित एवं वैध है । अतः प्रार्थी/ श्रमिक कोई राहत पाने का अधिकारी नहीं है ।.

दिनांक 23-9-2008

24. मैंने इस संदर्भ में विद्वान अभिभाषक प्रार्थी की इस आपत्ति पर भी विचार किया कि आरक्षण निरस्त हो चुका था लेकिन न तो इस संबंध में कोई जवाबुल जवाब पेश किया गया है और न ही अप्रार्थी के गवाहान् से ऐसा कोई सवाल जिरह में पूछा गया है , अत: प्रार्थी के अभिभावक की यह दलील मानने योग्य नहीं है । अन्य शिकायत प्रदर्श एम -9 भी प्रार्थी के विरुद्ध शिकायत है और उस पर नोटिस प्रदर्श एम-10 भी प्रार्थी को जारी किया गया है और जांच कार्यवाही प्रदर्श

मिथिलेख कुमार शर्मा , न्यायाधीश 6288

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 29, 2008/AGRAHAYANA 8. 1930

PART I- Sic. 3 ( ii ) ) ---

APPEARANCES:

नई दिल्ली , 4 नवम्बर, 2008

Workman in person ,

Shri Anil Kumar U.D.C. A / R for the management

AWARD

The Central Government Ministry of Labour vide OrderNo. L-42012/230 / 2004 - IR (CM - II ) dated 9-8-2005 has referred the following mdustrial dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication:

का.आ. 3145, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.पी. डब्ल्यू. डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच ,अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 2. नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 88/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 04-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/230/2004- आई आर ( सी एम-1 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 4th November, 2008

"Whether the demand of the Worker's Union for regularization of workman Shri Omkar Singh Sto Shri Bragi Singh in the establishment of CPWD is legal andjustified ? Ifyes, to what relief the workman is entitled and from which date?" S.O. 3145. -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 88/2005 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court , No. 2. New Delhi as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the Management of M/s. CPWD, Central Public Works Department. , and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 04-11-2008.

2. Today during the course of proceedings the workman moved an application praying for closure of his case.According to him he does not want to continue with this case in view of the writ petition filed in the Hon'ble High Court ofDelhi , I le further says that he has nothing to do with any workers' Uniion who may have espoused his case. Heard. In view ofthe prayer made by the workman in the application . No Dispute Award is passed in this case . Filebe consigned to record room ,

[No. L -42012/230/2004-4R ( CM -II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

SATNAM SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली. 4 नवम्बर, 2008 BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT NO. II RAJENDRA BHAWAN , RAJENDRA PLACE NEWDELHI

I.D.No. 8841S

DATE: 23-10-2008

In the matter of dispute between:-

का. आ, 3146, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बोच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 94/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 04-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

(सं. एल-22012/ 158/2006- आई आर ( सी एम -11 ) | अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी Shri Omkar Singh Su Shri Bragi Singh , Through Shri Ravi Shankar, General Secretary Workers Union, 167 , Panchkuan Road, New Delhi - 110001 .

New Delhi , the 4th November, 2008

...Workman

Versus

The Director General, M/s. C.P.W.D. Ninnan Bhawan, New Delhi - 110001 .

S.O. 3146.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government here by publishes the award ( Ref . No. 94/ 2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the Management of M/ s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited. and their workman , received by the Central Government o !: 04-11-2008.

2. Executive Engineer ( Elect) Elect . Constn. Divn . II, Central Public Works Department , A.C.D. , It, U.P.S.C. Dholpur House, New Delhi

[No.1 .-220 12/158/2006- IR ( CM - II)|

AJAY KUMAR GAUR . Desk Officer ...Management [ भाग 11- खण्द 3 (ii) ]

6289

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM -LABOUR COURTAT HYDERABAD

PRESENT: Shri Ved Praksh Gaur, Presiding Officer Dated the 24th day ofSeptember, 2008 Industrial Dispute No. 94/2006

BETWEEN:

TheGeneral Secretary,

(Sri Bandari Satyanarayana),

Singareni Collieries

...Petitioner Employees Council , H.No. 18-3-90/3 , Ganesh Nagar , Markandeya Colony, Godavarikhani , Karimnagar (Andhra Pradesh)-505209.

AND

TheGeneralManager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries

Company Limited, Mandamarri Division , Mandamani .

...Respondents APPEARANCES:

Nil

For the Petitioner :

For the Respondent : M/ s . M.V. Hanumanth Rao & K. Seetarama Rao ,Advocates

AWARD

TheGovernment of India, Ministry ofLabour by its Order No. 1-42012/ 158/2006- IR (CM - II) dated 6-11-2006 referred the following dispute under Section 10( 1 ) (d) of the 1.D. Act , 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management ofSingareni Collieries Company Limited and their workman. The reference is,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Mis . Singareni Collieries Company Limited in dismissing the services of Sri Boggula Chinnaiah w.e.f. 18-8-1999 is legal and justified ? If not, what relief is the workman entitled ? "

2. This reference was received in this office on 4-12-2006 and registered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 94/ 2006 and a copy of the reference order was served to the concerned workman / union and management . Notice was given from this court to both the parties by hand. From the Petitionner side , representative of the union filed an application authorizing Mr. V. Prakash to receive notice, but Mr. V. Prakash neither appeared before this court nor filedthe claim petition on behalf of the concerned workman.

The case is pending for the last two years and no action has been taken either by the workman himself or the union of the workman . As such it appears that neither the concerned workman nor the union to which he is associated is interested in filing the claim statement and any further action in this case . As such the opportunity to fite claim petition was closed by this court on 24-9-2008 . The Respondent side has filed vakalatmama as back as in March, 2007 and they were coming to the coint. As such in the absence of any claim statement or any adjournment application from the side of workman, this court has no other option, but to pass a ' Nil' Award in this case . Transmit, Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 24th day of September,2008.

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer Appendixofevidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL

NIL

Documents marked for thePetitioner NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent NIL

नई दिल्ली, 4 नवम्बर , 2008

का. आ. 3147. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ ५. 93/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 04.11.2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -22012/ 159/2006- आई आर ( सी एम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi ,the 4th November, 2008 S.O. 3147.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Govertament hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.93 /2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the Management of M/ s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 04-11-2008.

No. L- 22012/159/2006- IR ( CM - 11 )} AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer 6290

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 29 , 2008 /AGRAHAYANA 8 , 19.30

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURTAT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri VED PRAKASH GALF

PresidingOfficer

Hyderabad the 24th day of September , 2008 Industrial Dispute No. 93/2006

BETWEEN

The General Secretary , ( Sri Bandari Satyanarayana ), Singareni Colheries Employees Council ,

H.No. 18-3-90.3 , Ganesh Nagar,

Markandeya Colony, Godrvarikham ,

..... Pesiticour Karimnagar ( Andhra Pradesh ) -505209

AND

The General Manager .

M/s . Singareni Collferies Company ilanited,

Mandaniart: Division , Mandamari .

(PART 11- SEC. 3( 1) filed the claim petition on behalf ofthe concerned workman The case is pending for the dust two years and no action has been taken either by je workman himselt or the union of the workman . As vach ! appears that neither the concerned workman not the union to which he is associated isinterested in filing clair : srevenment and any further action in this case. As such the opportunity to file claim petition was closed by this coun un 24-9-2008 . The Respondent side has filed vakalamaruz as hack as in March, 2007 and they were coming to the went . As such in the absence of any claim statement or zay adinurmeni application from the side ofworkman , this coun has no other option, but to pass a 'Nil ' Award in these Frarismit

Dictatedto Smt . P. Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her conected ny me on this the 24th day of September,2008 .

VED PRAKASH CAUR. Presiding Officer Appenditure idence

Witnesses examined Wesses examined

for the Petitioner

de Respondent N

NIL .

Documents to the Petitioner

....Respondents

APPEARANCES:

N !!

For the Petitioner

For the Respostent

M- s M.V. Hanumanth Ra & K Seetarama Rau . Advocates

AWARD

The Government of Fadia. Ministry of Labour byis OrderNo. 1.-22012-139-2006 ( TR CM - 11 ) dated 6-11-2016 referred the following dispite under Section 10; 1 ) ( d ) of the 1.0 Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal betwe the manageriem of Singareni Collieries Company naited and their workmon. The reference is .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Ms. Singareni Collieries Company Limited in disesissing the services of Sri Md . Mohammed Ali wel 4-5-1999 is legal and justified ? Ifnou, to what relie' is the workman entitled ""

2. This reference was received in this office on 4-12-2006 and registered in this Tribunal as 1.D. Na . 93/2006 and a copy of the reference order was served te the concerned workmarmon and management . Netice was given troma thes court to both the parties by hand . From the Petitioner sade , representative of the union filed an application authorizing Mfr. V. Prakash to receive notee but Mr. V. Prakasin neither appeared before this court na Documents marked for the Respondent नई दिन्दर, 2008

का. आ. 3143. अंगिकार अधिनियम 19.4 में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. निजका और उनके कर्मकारों के 1947 का 19 ) की धारा सी. सी.एस. के प्रबंधतंत्र के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औधनका में केन्द्रीय सरकार अंद्यागिक अधिकरण, हैदरावाद के पंचार 2:2006 ) को प्रकाলि करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकारको प्राप्त हुआ था [ सं. एल-22012:10: 20 m आई आर ( सी एक्- ॥ ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi . the hi Noventber, 2008 5.0. 3148. In persuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 114 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publish as the award ( Ref . No 92 :2006 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- i.abom Court . Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure . in the Industrial Dispute between the Management of M .. Singareni Collieries Company Lamated , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 4-11-2008.

No 122012160: 2006 - IR ( CM - 11 ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR . Desk Officer 6291

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/आग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[भाग 1 ]- खण्ड 3(ii) )

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURTAT HYDERABAD

Present :

Shri VED PRAKASH GAUR, PresidingOfficer

Hyderabad the 24th day of September, 2008 Industrial Dispute No. 92/2006

Between:

TheGeneral Secretary,

(Sri Bandari Satyanarayana),

Singareni Collieries

Employees Council,

H.No. 18-3-90/3 , GaneshNagar, Markandeya Colony.

Petitioner Godavanikhani, Karimnagar (Andhra Pradesh)-505209.

AND

TheGeneral Manager , M/s. Singareni Collieries

Company Limitted, Mandamarri Division , Mandamarri .

Respondents APPEARANCES:

Nil

For the Petitioner :

For the Respondent : M/s. M. V. Hanumanth Rao & K. Seetarama Rao , Advocates

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labourby its Order No. L -22012/ 160/2006 ( IR CM - II) dated 6-11-2006 referred the following dispute under Section 10( 1 ) ( d ) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of Singareni Collieries Company Limited and their workman . The reference is,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of M/ s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited in terminating the services of Sri Durgam Thirupathi w.e.f. 28-2-1998 is legal and justified ? Ifnot, what relief is the workman entitled ? "

2. This reference was received in this office on 4-12-2006 and registered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 92/2006 and a copy of the refererice order was served to the concerned workman /union and management . Notice was given from this court to both the parties by hand. From the Petitioner side , representative of the union filed an application authorizing Mr. V. Prakash to receive notice, but Mr. V. Prakash neither appeared before this court nor filed the claim petition on behalf of the concerned workman . The case is pending for the last two years and no action has been taken either by the workman himself or the union of the workman . As such it appears that neither the concerned workman nor the union to which he is associated is interested in filing the claim statement and any further action in this case . As such the opportunity to file claim petition was closed by this court on 24-9-2008. The Respondent side has filed vakalatnama as back as in March, 2007 and they were coming to the court . As such in the absence of any claim statement or any adjournment application from the side of workman , this court has no other option , but to pass a ' Nil ' Award in this case . Transmit.

Dictatedto Smt. P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 24th day of September, 2008.

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer Appendixofevidence

Witnesses examined Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

for the Respondent

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent NIL

नई दिल्ली , 4 नवम्बर , 2008

का. आ. 3149, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 91/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था [सं. एल-22012/156/2006- आई आर ( सी एम -11 )

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th November, 2008 S.O. 3149.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award (Ref. No :91/2006) 6292

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 29, 2008 / AGRAHAYANA 8, 1930 [PART II-Scc . 3ţii ) | --

-:-

justitied? If not , to what retief is the workman entitled ?"

ofthe CentralGovernmem Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the Management of Mrs. Singareni Collieries Company Lirnited , and their workmen. receivedby the Central Coverummet on 04-11-2008.

No. 1. -22012/156 /2006 -IR ( CM- 11 ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURTAT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

SHRI VELJ PRAKASII GAUR

PRESIDING OFICER

Hyderabad the 24 th day of September , 2008 Industrial Dispute No. 91/2006

BETWEEN

The General Secretary , ( Sri Bandari Satyanarayana).

Singareni Collieries Employees Council ,

2. This reference was received in this office on 4-12-2006 and registered in this Tribunal as ID , No. 91/2006 and a copy of the reference order was served to the concerned workman'union and managernent . Notice was given from this court to both the parties by hand . From the Petitioner side, representative of the union fried an application authorizing Mr V Prakash to receive notice . but Mr. V. Prakash neither appeared before this court nor filed the claim petition on behalf of the concerned workman. The case is pending for the last two years and no action has been taken either by the workman himself or the union of the workman . As such it appears that neither the concerned workman nor the upon to which he is associated isinterested in filing claim statement and any further action In this case . As such the opportunity to file claim petition was closed by this court on 24-9-2008 . The Respondent side has filed vakalatnama as back as in March , 2007 and they were coming to the count As such in the absence of any claim statement or any adjournment application from the side of workman , this court has no other option , but 10 pass a 'Nil ' Award in this case Transmit .

H.No. 18-3-90/3 . Ganesh Nagar. Markandeya Colony , Godavariklumi , Karimnagar ( Andhra Pradesh 505209 .... Petitioner

Dictated to Smt . P.Pharm Gowri , Personal Assistanı transcribed by her corrected by me on this 24th day of September, 2008.

AND

VED PRAKASH GAUR , Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence The General Manager, M/ s. Singareni Collieries Company Limned. Mandamari Division , Mandamarri . .... Respondents

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent APPEARANCES :

NII , For the Petitioner

: Nil

Documents marked for the Petitioner For the Respondent

Mis . M.V. Hanumanth Ra & K. Sectarama Rao, Advocates

AWARD

Documents marked for the Respondent NIL

नई दिल्ली , 4 नवम्बर , 2008 The Government of India Ministry of Labourby its Order No. L- 22012 / 156 2006 IR ( CM - II ) dated 6-11-2006 referred the following dispute under Section 10( 1 )( d ) of the I.D. Act , 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of Singareni Collieries Company Limited and their workman . The reference is:

SCHEDULE

का. आ. 3150, आंद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में कंन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 90: 2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 04-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था। "Whether the action of the management of Mis . Singareni Collieries Company Limited in dismissing Sri Keesaroina Gattaiah w.e. f. 10-2-1998 is legai and

[सं. एल-22012/157/ 2006 आई आर ( सी एम-1 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , इंस्क अधिकारी [भाग ।।-खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 4th November, 2008 5.0. 3150.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.90/ 2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the Management of M/s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited, and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 04-11-2008.

[No. L-22012/ 157/2006- IR(CM- IT)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURTAT HYDERABAD

PRESENT :

Shri VED PRAKASH GAUR, PresidingOfficer Hyderabad the 24th day of September , 2008 Industrial Dispute No. 90/2006

BETWEEN:

TheGeneral Secretary,

(Sri Bandari Satyanarayana) ,

Singareni Collieries

Petitioner Employees Council , Η.Νο. 18-3-90/3 , Ganesh Nagar, Markandeya Colony, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar (Andhra Pradesh)-505209.

AND

TheGeneral Manager,

M/ s. Singareni Collieries

Company Limitted, Mandamarri Division, Mandamarri .

Respondents APPEARANCES :

For the Petitioner : Nil

For the Respondent : M/ s. М.У. Наnumanth Rao & K. Sectarama Rao , Advocates

AWARD

TheGovernment of India, Ministry ofLabour by its Order No. L-22012/ 157/2006 (RI CM - II) dated 6-11-2006

6293

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8, 1930 ..

referred the following dispute under section 10( 1 ) (d) of the 1.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management ofSingareni Collieries Company Limited and their workman . The reference is;

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of M /s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited in dismissing SiJanagam Ramakrishna w.c.f. 26-9-2001 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?"

2. This reference was received in this office on 4-12-2006 and registered in this Tribunal as J.D. No. 90/2006 and a copy of the reference order was served 10 the concerned workman/ umion and management . Notice was given from this court to both the parties by hand. From the Petitioner side , representative of the union filed an application authorizing Mr. V. Prakash to receive notice, but Mr. V. Prakash neither appeared before this court nor filed the claim petition on behalf ofthe concerned workman . The case is pending for the last two years and no action . has been taken either by the workman himself or the union of the workman . As such it appears that neither the concerned workman nor the union to which he is associated is interested in filing the claim statement and any further action in this case. As such the opportunity to file claim petition was closed by this court on 24-9-2008. The Respondent side has filed vakalatnama as back as in March, 2007 and they were coming to the court . As such in the absence of any claim statement or any adjournment application from the side of workman , this court has not other option , but to pass a ' Nil' Award in this case. Transmit,

Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 24th day of September, 200R.

VED PRAKASH GAUR , Presiding Officer Appendix ofevidence

Witnesses :xamined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL

NIL

Decoments marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Decuments marked for the Respondent NIL 6294

[ PART II-S .. 3ti) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29. 2008/ AGRAHAYANA 8 , 1930

नई दिल्ली , 4 नवम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 3151,--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बौच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 89/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को (04-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [ सं. एल -22012/93/2006- आई आर ( सी एम- ! ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th November , 2008 S.O. 3151.la pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Acr , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.89: 2006 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as showr is the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the Management of M / s Singarens Collieries Limited , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 04-11-2008.

[No. 1. -22012/93/2006- IR ( CX - 11 ) AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

Present : Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Dificer Dated the 24th day of September , 2008 Industrial Dispute No. 89/2006

Between:

AWARD

The Governmem of India , Ministry of Labour by ins Order No. L-22012 / 93 / 2006 Ri ( CM - 11) dated 1-11-2006 referred the following dispute under Section 10( 1 )( d) of the J.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between Whe management of Singareni Collieries Company Limited and their workman . The reference is;

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Mrs. Singaren: Collieries Company Limited it terminating the services of Sri Nakka Durga Swamy w.e.f. 24-3-2000 15 legal and justified? Ifnot , what relief is the workman enotled

2. This reference was received in this office on 4-12-2006 and registered in this Tribunal as I.D. No 89/2006 and a copy of the reference order was served to the concerned workman union and management . Notice was given from this court to both the parties by hand. From the Petitioner side , representative of the union filed an application authorizing Mr. V. Prakash to receive notice. bup Mr. V. Prakash neither appeared before this court nor filed the claim petition on behalf of the concerned workman The case is pending for the last two years and no action has been taken either by the workman himself or the union of the workman . As such it appears that neither the concerned workman nur the union to which he is associated is interested in filing the cleim statement and any further action in this case. As auch the opportunity to file claura petition was closed by tus court on 24-9-2008 The Respondent side bas fried akalatriarna as back as in March, 2007 and they were coming to the court . As such in the absence of any clam statement or any adjournment application from the side of workman, this court hats Bot other option , but to pass Nil Award in this case . Transmit.

Dictated to Sin . P Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 24h day of September, 2008 .

Pestioner

The General Secretary . (Sri Bandari Saryanarayana ) , Singareni Collierios Employees Council , H.No. 18-3-90 :3 , Ganesh Nagar, Markandeya Colony. Godavarikhani , Karimnagar (Andhra Pradesh ) -5105209 .

And

The General Manager, M/ s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Mandamari Division, Mandamarri .

VED PRAKASH GAUR . Presiding Oficer Appetatis of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined Petitioner for the Respondend

Respondetits

APPEARANCES

Nit

For the Petitioner:

M's. M.V. Hanumanth Ro & For the Respondent:

K. Seetarama Rue .

Advocates

NIL

Documents or seed for the Petitioner NE

Decuments raarkeed for the Respondent Nil.

[भाग ][- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 4 नवम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 3152, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. सी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विषाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 88/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 04-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22012/91/2006- आई आर ( सी एम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 4th November, 2008 S.O. 3152. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 88/2006) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M/ s. Singareni Collieries Compony Limited, and their workman , received by the Central Government on 04-11-2008 .

[No. L-22012/91/2006 - IR ( CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURTAT HYDERABAD

Present: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer Dated the 24th day of September, 2008 Industrial Dispute No. 88/2006 Between:

TheGeneral Secretary,

(Sri Bandari Satyanarayana) , Singareni Collieries Employees Council , H.No.18-3-90/3, Ganesh Nagar,

Markandeya Colony, Godavarikhani , Karimnagar (Andhra Pradesh ) - 505209 ... Petitioner And

The General Manager,

M/ s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Mandamarri Division , Mandamarті ,

6295

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

the L.D. Act , 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of Singareni Collieries Company Limited and their workman . The reference is ,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of M/ s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited in terminating the services of Sri Dhara Prabhakar w.e.f. 6-11-2001 is legal and justified? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled ?"

2. This reference was received in this office on 4-12-2006 and registered in this Tribunal as 1.D. No. 88/ 2006 and a copy of the reference order was served to the concerned workman / union and management . Notice was given from this court to both the parties by hand . From the Petitioner side , representative of the union filed an application authorizing Mr. V. Prakash to receive notice, but Mr. V. Prakash neither appeared before this court nor filed the claim petition on behalf ofthe concerned workman. The case is pending for the last two years and no action has been taken either by the workman himself or the union of the workman . As such it appears that neither the concerned workman nor the union to which he is associated is interested in filing the claim statement and any further action in this case. As such the opportunity to file claim pelition was closed by this courton 24-9- 2008. The Respondent side has filed vakalatnama as back as in March , 2007 and they were coming to the court . As such in the absence of any claim statement or any adjournment application from the side of workman, this court has no other option , but to pass a ' Nil' Award in this case . Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 24th day of September,2008.

VED PRAKASH GAUR , Presiding ( Micer Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for thePetitioner

Witnesses examined for theRespondent

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NI1 .

...Respondents

APPEARANCES

For the Petitioner : NIL

For the Respondent: M/s . M.V. Hanumanth Rao &

K. Seetarama Rao, Advocates

AWARD

G=108 T

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/91/ 2006 - IR( CM.II ) dated 1-11-2006 reterred the following dispute under Section 10( 1 ) (d) of Documents marked for the Respondent NIL

नई दिल्ली , 4 नवम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 3153 ,-औद्योगिक विवाद् अधिनियम , 1947 का ।4 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. यो भी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों .. अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्यागिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 87/2006 ) को 6296

PAR: St ) OF INDIA 29.2008 AGRAHAYANAS 100

14-12-2000 is legal and justified? If not , to what relict is the workman entitled ? "

प्रकाशित काही सरकार को 4-11-2016. हुआ था ।

नं॥ 32101242.2006 आईआ :

New Ochi du Norge S

S..

Induscial

Govenisgrees bishesin Award ( R ば of the Land Gerent ledestria , Libarsal-. Couil , Hyderas shown Industrial Dsi peteen the tanas ven .

Singareni Collicricompony onl received in the Governton

ALAY KUMAR GAURD

ANNEXURE

BEFORE TAL GOVER

INDUSTRIAL TRIEVA

Present: Star Preda ::

2. This reference was received in this affice on 4-12-2006 and registered in this Iribunal as 1.0 . No. 87 2006 and a copy of the reference order was served to the concerned workmann and management . Notice was given from this cour cotit the parties by hand . From the Petitioner siderne of the ummon filed an application authorizir: Air V. Prakash to receive notice . but Mr. V. Prakash appearedbefore this court wor filed the clainen on behalf ot the cayeernee WOTONER The case . 1 for the last two years and no action has beente her is the wekman sursel or the union of the accher the concerned As such it appears tu man am the union to which he is associated is inte.eced in liling the charm statemen and any further act in this case. As such the apportunity to file claim. painon was closed by this court 24-9-2008. The Reschacht side has filed vakalatmama as hack as in Match and they were coming to the Court . As such in theme of any claim statement or ans adjournmeam p La Bom the sidest workman. this short has the eth Dattopass a Nil Award in this case. Trazsaj .

Fashita Dispats No. 87.2

Dictatedto SzGeeti . Personal Assist1001 transcribed by her , cortedly me on this the 24th dan September. 2008 .

Between :

The General Secrets

VED PRAKAS !! GALIR, Presiding Officer Appendix of Evidence

(Sri Bandart Natyraya

Singarem Colic Festmerci !

H.No. 18-3-910 Gadagur

Witnesses cxamined : thePeintioner

Wesses examined tor the Responderi

Mukandeya CoinCasarikhani .

Karimnagar Anda Prajj 50:20

Documents starfsed for the Petitioner And

The General Magar

Mis. Singareni pania .

Mandamaru

Documents Rize for the Respondent NIL

GRANCTS :

नईनवर 18

For the Pe

For the

AWARD

The Creverness Nudia , Ministr

order No. 1-230120- RCM

referred the following dispate ander Nectam j

the ! ) . djudication turhis L

का. आ. 3754.अधिनियम ? 11947 का 14 जनमें कंन्द्रीय सरकार एम. सी. सी. एल, संदियाजकों क कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुगक विवाद में कन्द्रीन भरकार औद्यागिक 85/2006 ) को प्रकाशनी है जो कंन्द्रीय भार को 4-11-2008 को प्राप्त ।

the managemers of Sigarem Collieries ( on: passi

and then wristor laers is

| सं. एन 0 2006- आईआर ( मी उम li अजय कुमार गौड़, देस्क अधिकारी

...

New Deiko November , 2003 M

SG Page:

S.O. 3154. 1of Section i at the Industrial Disputes 114 of 1947 ) , the Central 6297 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[भाग [ 1- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 85/ 2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M/ s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited, and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 4-11-2008

[No. L-22012/50/2006- IR (CM -11 ) ]

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

Present: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer

was given from this court to both the parties by hand . From the Petitioner side , representative of the union filed an appli- cation authorizing Mr. V. Prakash to receive notice , but Mr. V. Prakash neither appeared before this court nor filed the claim petition on behalf of the concerned work- man . The case is pending for the last two years and no action has been taken either by the workman himselfor the union of the workman,As such it appears that neither the concerned workman nor the union to which he is associated is interested in filing the claim statement and any further action in this case . As such the opportunity to file clain petition was closed by this count on 24-9-2008. The Respondent side has filed vakalatnama as back as in March, 2007 and they were coming to the court . As such in the absence of any claim statement or any adjournument applica- tion from the side of workman , this court has no other option , but to pass a"Nit Award in this case . Transmit .

Dated the 24th day of September, 2008

Industrial Dispute No. 85/2006

Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistanı transcribed by her, corrected by me on this the 24th day of September,2008 .

Between:

VED PRAKASH GAUR, PresidingOfficer TheGeneral Secretary,

(Sri Bandari Satyanarayana),

Appendix ofevidence

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Respondent

NIL

...Petitioner

Singareni Collieries Employees Council, H.No.18-3-90/3 , Ganesh Nagar, Markandeya Colony, Godavarikhani , Karimnagar (Andhra Pradesh ) - 505209

Documents marked for the Petitioner And

The General Manager,

...Respondents

M/ s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Mandamarri Division, Mandamarri .

Documents marked for the Respondent NIL

APPEARANCES

नई दिल्ली, 4 नवम्बर , 2008 NIL

For the Petitioner :

For the Respondent : M/ s . M. V , Hanumanth Rao & K. Seetarama Rao , Advocates

AWARD

का.आ. 3155 , औद्योगिक बिबाद अधिनयम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एसः सो. म्गे. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में कंन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 86/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/51 /2006- आईआर ( सी एम -11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी TheGovernment of India , Ministry ofLabour by its order No. L-22012/50/ 2006 - IR( CM .- II ) dated30-10-2006 referred the following dispute under section 10( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of Singareni Collieries Company Limited and their workman, The reference is :-

New Delhi, the 4th November , 2008 SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited in termi- nating the services of Sri Ellala Laxminarayana w.e.f. 12-2-1998 is legal and justified ? If not, to whal relicl is the workman entitled ? "

S.O. 3155. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 86.2006 ) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M's . Singareni Collieries Company Limited , and their workinen. received bythe Central Government on 4-11-2008 .

[No. L -22012/ 51 /2006 - IR ( CM - 11 ) AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer 2. This reference was received in this office on 4-12-2006 and registered in this Tribunal as 1.10 , No. 85/2006 and a copy of the reference order was served to the concerned workman /union and management . Notice 6248

Y OF INDIA

ANNEXURE

BERE DHE CENTRAL GOVERNME INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR ( )

HYDERABAD

Present : Ved Praka : Gaur . Presiding

the 24th day of Seprenibes ...

Judustrial Dispute No. 86/2006 Between :

The Gener

R 29 , 2008 /AGRAHAYAN 1030 PART II Stc. 300 ) absence of any chain statement or any adjournment application from the sole of workman , this court has no other option , butto pass NT Award in this case . Iraansmit Dictated to Site Plan Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her conted by me on this the 24th day of September,2008.

VED PRAKASH GAUR. Presiding Meer Appendixofevidence

Witnesses examined for the Winmesses examined for the Petitioner

(Sri Baulil

Singare simployees Loomed ,

No.18-5 Nag

Markandavarik lani .

KarinaPradesin - 505209 Pegasar And

The tieneral Water .

M's Singarvo.Coincriest ummpany Limited.

Mandam.n : Mandamurri .

...Respondents

APPEARANCES

NIE

For thePer

For the Resporin Ms.M.V. Hanumanth Rad K Sectarama Rao AdS

AWARD

The Govenda. Ministry of lewe by its order Ne 1-2351 2006 - IRI ( M.11 ) dated 30-06 teterreu the toiling dispute under section The Adjudication to this tobimu , besacen the managemey Sugareni Collieries Compus : Samiked cond their worktor se reference is ,

SCHEDULE.

Wath of the manager: Meries Conspans Lin Sti Nagsasali 4-3-1995d jusutic Intowa 2.1ch was received in this 4-12-2003 rius Tribunal as D 86 2006 andere onder was en 。 concealed on and managem.nr. Notes given zum is at the parties han Petitioner saic testve of the quen applicamos acthow Mr V. Prakashrcive but Mr. V. Prakash neither appeared belveth filed the Claim potitenog belait ofthe concerns . i . The case is pendra lor de last two years and stina has been taken cither is me workenault asella of the settl concertenken to white is is interested like : chair sind actions : cht appear lat nents: the aber tunity t 21-9-20

! casrch .

Respondent

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioneг

NEL

Documents marked for the Respondent नई दिल्ला 4 नवम्गर , 2008

का. आ. 3156, आचक रिवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा के के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध केन्द्रीय सरकार मिलिट्री कॉम और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट ओगिक विवाद में कंन्द्रीय सरकार आंद्यांगि अधिकरणः श्रम न्यायालच । चण्डीगढ़ के पंचार संदर्भ संख्या 1,3,5.7/99 ) को प्रकाश दी है जा केन्द्रीय सरकार को 04-11 2008 को प्राप्न ।

[सं. एल -1401224210-98 आईआर ई..।

अनय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi theth November , 2018

S.O. 3156. In pursuance of Section 17 th Industrial Disputes A 1017114 of 1947 ), the ( entral Government hereby publishes the award (Ref No. 1.3.5.7 99 ) of the Central Goshmem Industrial Tribunal - coin- Labour Court No indigarh . as shown in the Annexure , in the bidusir alDispene hetween the employers in relation to the mansaitient of Militry Form and their workman, which was recedhethe Central Government (3 ) 4-11-2008 .

No125.24, 22.20 98-183 MAY KUMAR. Desk Olicer

ANSENURE

BEFORE SHRIGENENDRA KUMAR SHARMA. PRESIDING OFRECENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBI M - LABOUR COURET

GAREL

Case No LDs . 109,340 , 509 , 7/99 of 1949,

10. Nu . 1.99 of Sh. 15. Nalum

ID.No. 3.99 ofSh . Singh .

ID . No. 5/99 of St is

ID. No. 7.990S S

.... Applicants भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8, 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

Versus

TheOfficer Incharge , Military Farm , Pathankot- 145001.

6299

....Respondent

APPEARANCES

Sh . Anandeshwar Gautam.

For the Workклап :

Sh. K.K. Thakur .

For the Management:

AWARD

Passed on:-21-10-08

Government of India referred the following indus- trial disputes for judicial adjudication to this Tribunal namely , ID 1/99 regarding Sh , Pankaj salaria , Ref. No. L- 14012/25 /98/ IR (DU ) dated 13-11-98 , ID 3/99 regarding Sh . Jaswant Singh, Ref. No.L - 14012/24/98/ IR ( DU) dated 13-11-1998, ID 5/99 regarding Sh . Rajesh Kumar, Ref. No. L-14012/ 22 /98 /IR ( DU ) dated 13-11-1998 , and ID, 7/99 regarding Sh . Somraj , Ref.No. L- 14012/20/98 / IR (DU) dated 13-11-1998. The common question of law and facts are in- volved in all these references . Hence , for convenience and for ends ofjustice all the references are hereby adjudicated by a common award LD. No. 1/99 will be the leading file .

The main question before this Tribunal for judicial adjudication is whether the action ofofficer in charge Mili- tary farm, Pathankot in terminating the services of all the 4 workmen mentioned above whose references are in ques- tion are legal and justified? It not, to what relief all the workmen are entitled?

All the 4 workmen have filed similar statement of ciam that they joined the Military farm Pathankot asa labourer on different dates in the year 1999 as follows;

Sh . Pankaj Salaria joined , on 7-8-94 , Sh . Jaswant Singhjoinedon 1-6-94, Sh. Rajesh Kumar joinedon 6-1-94 and Sh. Somraj joined on 6-5-94. Their services were termi- nated on 1-12-97 by the management of respondent. It is alleged by the workmen that they, all have completed 240 days of work in the preceding year from the date of their termination . Their services were terminated without the notice or retrenchment compensation against the provi- sion of Industrial Disputes Act. On the basis of these aver- ments , the workmen have requested the Tribunal for an order reinstating them in the services along with back wages. Management of respondent appeared in all the cases and raised preliminary objections that this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to dispose of these refernce on two counts.

(A) That the respondent is not an industry and the relationship between respondent and workmen are not that of employer employee relationship.

(B) The Central Administrative Tribunal constituted under the Central Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 has the jurisdiction to redress the griev- ances ofthe workmen .

It has also been stated by the respondent that all the workmen along with few others opted to file a petition No.625/PB /96 against the notice of termination before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Benchwhich was decided vide order dated 20-12-96. After the termination oftheservices of the workmen , all the workmen along with others again filed NDA No.589/PB/97 before the Central Administrative Tribunal , Chandigarh Bench which was dismissed by the Tribunal vide judgement dated 26-3-97. Thereafter, a contempt petition was also moved before the Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench which was dismissed by the Tribunal with the remarks that the applicants should avoid in filing such frivolous petitions in future .

On merits , it has been stated by the management of respondent that all the workmen were engaged as labourer from the date mentioned in their statement of claim . As per the policy of the Government of India all the labourers working on temporary basis were to be regularized as per the terms and conditions of the policy. One of the conditions was that workman should be enrolled in the office of employment officer and his name should be sponsored by the employment officer . Names of wormen were not sponsered by the employment officer, hence , they could not be regularized and as there was no work for the casual labourers, their services were no more required and were accordingly terminated. It has also been alleged by management of respondent that none of the workman has completed 240 days of work in the proceeding year from the date of their termination.

Parties were afforded the opportunity for adducing evidence oral and documentary . An officer of MES filed the affidavit and he was subjected to cross - examination by leamed counsel for the workmen . Evey workman was cross - examined in respective references . Parties also preferred to filed the documentary evidence . Ex.M/xis experience certificate given by Sh . R.C. Sonkar, Farm Officer regarding the work of Sh . Pankaj Salaria. Same certificates have been provided by the respondent of management to rest of the workmen . R1 is the copy of the order dated 20-12-1996 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal , Chandigarh Bench in OA No.625 - P8 of 1996. R2 is also the copyofthe order passed by Central Administrative Tribunal , Chandigarh Bench dated 26-5-97 passed in OA No.589-18 of1997. R3 is also an order dated 20-11-97 passedby Central Administrative Tribunal , Chandigarh Bench in COCP No. 49/97 in OA No.625/ PB/ 96, R4 is the Circular Letter regarding the terms and conditions of service of casual industrial and non- industrial employees. R5 is the minutes ofthe 4th meeting ( 10 term ) ofArmy HO JCH counsel dated 10-5-96. R6 is notice dated 17 , January , 1996 given to all the workmen.

Heard learned counsels for the parties . Perused the materials on record . Learned counsels for the workman have argued that all the workman have worked for more 6300 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29, 2008 / AGRAHAYANA 8. 1930

: -

than 240 days in the calender year proceeding to the date of their termination . As their services were tertiusted without any notice or retrenchment compensation , they are entitledto the relief as preyed in compliance of the provisions of Industral Disputes Act .

Learned counsel for the management has alleged that respondent is not an industry and the dispute between the workmen and respondent is not an industrial dispute There is no relationship of a nature which can be termed as employee- employer relationship and, accordingh, this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to dispose of these references. Learned counsel for the management of responders has also argued that Central Administrative tribunal constituted under the Central Administrative Tribuna! Act , has got jurisdiction to redress the grievances ot the workmen and the same has redressed the grievances in finality and the judgement of Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench will operate as resjudicata in these references .

Learned Counsel for the management of respondent has further argued than as there was no work availabk: for the workmen , their services were rightly terminated as per the policy of Central Clavemment because their names were not sponsoredby the Employment Office as desired by the Central Government policy.

The main issues before this Tribunal for adjudication of these references are: -

1. Whether the respondent is an industry? If yes . affects?

2. Whether this Tribunal has got no jurisdiction tier disposal of these references !!

3. Whether the orders passed by the Georgi Administrative Tribunal . Chandigarh Bench , dated 26-3-1997, will operate as res judicata in all these references ?

4. To what relie!, l'any , the workmen are entitled I am adjudicating all these issues one by one The terrn Industry has been defined in section Zijnor the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , 10 mean any business. trade undertaking, manufacturing or calling upon emplesers and includes any calling . services , employment . hardierali or industrial occupation or avocation of workmen In Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. A. Rajappa and others AIR . 1978 Suprem Court 548.7 Judges Bench of Hon'ble the Apes Court has defined the word Industry . As per the above mentioned law laid down by the Apex Court , industry has defined in Sub - section 21.1 ) as a wide terns and nuport as: -

( a ) Where there is ( 1 ) systematic activity . organized by co - operation between employer and employee ( the direct and substantial element is chiumerical ), and ( iii ) for the production and or

PARI JIST.c. 3 ( ii ) ) distribution of goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes ( not spiritual or religious but inclusive of material things or services geared in celestial bliss ) , prima facie . there is an industry in the enterprise.

(b) Absence ofprofit motive or gainful obejective is irrelevant , be the venture in the public , joint . private or other sector.

(c) The true focus is functional and the decisive test is the nature of the nativity with special emphasis on the cimployer - employee relations .

(d) If the organization is a trade or business it does not cease to be one becaue of philanthropy aniamating the undertaking .

Thus , the test ( specially triple test ) referred by Hon'ble the Apex Court in Banglore Water Supply case (Supra) are neccesary to puality any institution to be call industry,

Regarding the sovereign firmetions , Hon'ble the Apex Court in Bangalore Water Supply Case ( supra las held that sovereign functions strictly understood cannon alone qualify the exemption , nor the welfare activities or economic advantage undertaken by Government or statutory bodies . Even in departments discharging sovereign functions, ifthere are unns which qualifted to he the industry and they are substantially several then , they can be considered to come within Section 21.1 ( נון the definations of Industry .

Thus , the decision wirether the particular organization is industry not has to be taken by the work done and business carried on by it, which absolutely depends on the facts and circumstances of each Case . 1 have gone through the evidence of the management . The officer of military farın . Pathankot in all the references has stated in his affidavit that the rain function of the mihtary are to supply milk and milk products to the armed forces of the union and also to supply Hay of the animals to the armed forces of umon . Big farms are maintained by military form, Pathankot and milk and milk products are produced . Thus the function of tcntaining the tarins and producing the milk and milk products sad the services rendered lin the maintenance of above mentioned working , it cannot be said that the military karm pualified for the sovereign functions. Without dispuung the fact that most of the functions of the organization , whose unit is military farme, maybe the sovereign functions but the unit military farma on the basis of work done and service rendered is industry as held by Hobble the Apex Court in Bangalore Water supply Case ( suprai that even in departments discharging sovereiga lunctions , if there we uhls which are industries and they are substantially sexegral then they canbe considered 10 come within Section2tj ) in the definition of Industry. flat on the basis of above भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008 /अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[ भाग ] [-खण्ड (ii) ]

mentioned observation , I am of the view that respondent is an industry. Paper No. 3 which is a circular letter of the respondent containing terms and conditions of service of casual industrial and non industrial employees also support the above contention that certain groups which are working withthe Military farm are considered as industrial groups and it cannot be said that respondent is not an industry. It is undoubtedly an industry and the dispute in between the workmen and the management of respondent is the industrialdispute. Moreover, in cross -examination , MWI , the witness of management has also stated that retrenchment compensation shall not be given because none of the workman has completed 240 days of work in the calendar year proceeding to their termination . This also provide the reason to believe that respondent Military farm was adopting the procedure laid down in Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, considering the applicants as workmen and itself as industry.

Now the question before this Tribunal is what will be theeffect ofthe orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal , Chandigarh Bench on applications moved by the workmen and whether these orders will operate as res judicata while answering these references.

A notice R- 6 dated 17-1-96 was given to all the workmen with the following language:

"Your services are hereby terminated after one month of issue ofthis notice as you were not sponsoredby Employment Exchange and not completed 240 days of service each in two calender years".

After receiving this notice all the workmen along with others filed the petition before the Central Administrative Tribunal which was decided on 20-11-96. While deciding the application Central Administrative Tribunal passed the following order: -

"We have heard both the parties and it seems that only fair solution to the problem would be that the applicants should get themselves registered with the Employment Exchange , if they have not done so far . The respondents shall place a requisition with the Employment Exchange as and when they have work and shall also issue to the applicants experience certificate of having worked withterm for the period in each case before their termination orders are to be passed for getting weight age if permissible under the rules to get their names sponsored by the Employment Exchange . The interim order , passed earlier is vacated. The original applications stands disposed ofwith these directions . No costs . "

There is no material on record that names of the workmen, as directed by Central Administrative Tribunal in above mentioned order , were sponsored by the Employment Exchange resulting in the termination of services ofthe workmen. Thereafter , all the workmen filed

6301 another application before Central Administrative Tribunal and the Central Administrative Tribunal dismissed the application in liminie being not maintainable . While dismissing the application , Central Administrative Tribunal discussed all the facts and the law laid down by Hon'ble theApex Court in Raj Kumar and others vs. Shakti Raj and others , 1972 (2) SLR Page 130. The cause for dismissing the applications of workmen which is apparent from the order of Central Administrative Tribunal dated 26-5-97 is that temporary status cannot be given to the workmen in view of the policy of the Government. The Tribunal has also held that their reinstatement is not possible because their names were not sponsoredby Employment Exchange as required by the policy ofthe Central Government .

The questionbefore this Tribunal is altogether different . The question before this Tribunal is not whether the temporary status can be given to the workmen or whether order for regularization of the services of the workmen can be passed by this Tribunal ? The question before this Tribunal is whether the workmen are entitled for the reliefon the ground of illegal termination?

As stated earlier that respondent is an industry. So, the dispute between the workmen and the respondent is an industrial dispute . There exists an employer and employee relationship between the workmen and the respondent . It is not the case of the management that the initial appointment of the workmen was illegal . If the workmen have completed 240 days of work in the calender year proceeding to the date oftheir termination , they have a legal right protected by the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 that their services cannot be terminated without notice and retrenchment compensation in compliance of the provisions of the Act . The question before the Central Administrative Tribunal was altogether different and that was legality of the notice given to the workmen regarding their termination of services and temporary status/ regularization of their services.

At the cost of repetition , this Tribunal has got the jurisdiction to adjudicate these references . The notice R- 5 which was given to the workmen clearly shows that it was the notice given under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act and it was not expected from the workmen to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal but to approach the right forum mentioned under the Industrial Disputes Act. Accordingly , the orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal on 20-12-96 and 26-3-97 will not be having any effect while adjudicating these references because this Tribunal has got jurisdiction to adjudicate these references as stated earlier .

It is true that the doctrine of estoppel , res judicata etc. are applicable in the proceedings before the Industrial Tribunal and Labour Courts . But in these references 6302

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA NOVEMBER 29, 2008 / AGRAHAYANA 8. 1930 PAR : 11 - Seri

has also held that every workman has worked for more than 240 days in the preceding year from the date of their termination . I am not taking notice ofthis finding but holding on the basis of the evidence oral and documentary that every workman has worked more than 240 days in the calendar year preceding to the date of their termination and theywere entitled for the benefit of law contained in industrial Disputes Act , that their services should not have heen terminated without notice or retroschment compensation which was illegally done by the management . At the cost of repetition , the question before this Tribunal is not granting oftemporary status or regualrization of their serivees which can only be done subjected to the policy of the Central Goverument . I am confining myselfonly to the procedure of termination adopted by the respondent which are against the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act and the term ofworkmen are illegal . Theirtermination being illegal . they are entitled for the relief.

Now, the question before this Tribunal is what remedy should be provided to the workmen Whenever the termination of any workman is illegal , there are two possible remedies available namely: -

1. Reinstatement of the workmen on the post they were holding and on which they were working at the time of the termination and

2. A reasonable compensation .

position is altogether different. Any order can operate as resjudicata when it is passed by the Court of competent jurisdiction and the question before the court in the previous petition and before this Tribunal are same. The question before this Tribunal is different . The adjudicanen by the Central Administrauve Tribunal , which has taken a view how to give the temporary status regularization the services of the workmen , and while taking this view the Central Administrative Taibunal has suggested mechanian as well that if the names of the workmen are sponsored by the employment exchange , they will be considered for regularization . Linder the Industrial Disputes Act . as a Presiding Officer I have no juridiction to discuss the granting of the temporary status or regularization of the services ofthese workmen , I have to confine myself whether their termination was in terms ofthe provisions of Industrial Disputes Act . There is no bar for temination ofthe services ofthe workmen who have completed 240 days ot work in a calendar year preceding to the date of termination Hus termination should have been strictly as per the pros isiote contained in the Industrial Disputes Act . Meaning thereby before terminating the services of the workmen who have completed the 240 days of work in the calendar vear preceding to the date of termination a notice and retrenchment compensation is mandatory requirement which was not done by the management of military farın Being different issues for adjudication, orders dated 20-12-96 and 26-3-97 will not operate as reajudicata while answering these references .

In the cases like these where the respondent in compliance of the policy of the Central Government has regularized all the casual labourers or granted the tempuray status to them and no work for the casual labourers is lett , their reinstatement into the Services will not be the proper remedy and they should be compensated reasonable in terins of money . What should be a reasonable compen sation is to be decided on the basis of facts and circumstances of the each case . Factors like amoulit of retrenchment compensanon to be guen to the workmen at the time of their termination , depreciation for the value of money and the cost of litigation which the workmen were forced to incur on account of their illegal termination are to be considered while awarding the compensation . Considering all these facis . Iam of the new that Rs.200.000 to each of the workman will be reasonable compensation to be provided to redress their grievances and to adjurticate all these references Accordingly , management of respondent is directed to provide Rs . 20,000 as compensation to each of the workman itotal Rs 80.0001 within a month from the date of publication of this award . All these references are disposed of accordingly. 110194 is the leading file in which ward is passed . Let a copy of this award be kept in files at all other references names ID3-99 , ID5 :99 and ID7-99, Central Government be intermed File be consigned.

G & SHARMA . Presiding Offer Now, I have to discuss whether the workmen Lave completed 240 days of work in a calendar year precedingto date of their termination . It is true that in the notice R - 6 . it is mentioned that the workman has not completed 2410 days ofservice. But R- [ which is the certificate given by the respondents provides that all workmen have worked frum thedate of their appointments till 10-2-1997 as casual labour. All the relevant docuinents which are relating to the work ofworkmen are lying with the management of respondent . It is true that the workmen have to prove that thes have worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year preceding to the date of their terimination by some cogent evidence, Merely mentioning these facts in affidavit and statement of claim will not be sutlicicnt. The workmen have filed the experince certificate which undoubtedly proved that evey workman has worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year preceding to the date of their termination. It is the certificate provided by the respondent and all other document regarding working days of every workman ane lying with the respondent which failed to file the sume before this Tribunal . Thus , on the basis of this certificate. I am accepting the contention of every workman that they have worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year preceding to the date of their termination . Needless to say that Central Administrative Tribunal in both of these orders 6303 [भाग - खण्ड 3 ( ji ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8. 1930

नई दिल्ली, 4 नवम्बर , 2008

Chandigarh , w.e.f. 1-8-90 is justified? If not . what relicthe is entitled to?"

2. The present reference was made by the Central Government on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication of the matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid.

का.आ. 3157. औद्योगिक बिजाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर- संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औधोगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं -1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 103/94 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 4-11-08 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

3. this reference. The management turned up and opposes [सं. एल-40012/ 115/93 - आईआर ( डी.यू. ) ] अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 4th November , 2008

4.As per office memorandum dated 5-9-08 , this case was fixed in pre lok adalat meeting on 17-10-08 for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism . The prescribed authority of the management made a statement that the management has agreed to provide job to Mrs. Salma widow of Habib Mohammad through contractor as per policy of the Government . On this assurance the widow of the workman withdraw reference in Lok Adalat Accordingly the reference is returned to the Central Government as sett lodin Lok Adalat Central Governmentbe informed. File be consigned to record.

S.O. 3157. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 103/ 94) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Departinent of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on4-11-2008 .

Chandigarh

17-10-2008

[No. L-40012/ 115/93 - IR (DU) ] AJAY KUMAR , Desk Officer

G. K. SHARMA. Presiding Officer ANNEXURE

नई दिल्ली, 5 नवम्बर , 24108 BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- L CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D. 103/94

Sh . Itabib Mohamad , H. No. 1251 , Gandhi Nagar, Ropar (Pb.) ...Applicant

Versus

का. आ. 3158.---औद्योगिक विन्ाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार जम्पू एवं कश्मीर बैंक लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संचद्ध नियोजकों और उनकं कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्यागिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक अधिकरण चण्डीगढ़ नं । के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 17/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

(1 ) Divisional Engineer , Phones - F. ( L.O.B. ) , Telepone Bhawan, Sector- 17 . Chandigarh -160017.

[सं. एल-12012/305/2002- आई. आर. ( बी -1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी (2) The General Manager , Telecom , Chandigarh'Telecom District. Chandigarh . ...Respondent

New Delhi, the 5th November , 2008 APPEARANCES

For the workman :

Shri N.P. Mittal

Shri G.C. Babbar

For the Management:

AWARD

Passed on 17-10-2008

Central Government vide notification No. L-40012/ 115.93-IR ( DU ), dated 24-8-94 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

S.O. 3158.--In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 17/ 2003) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of J & K Bank Ltd. , and their workmen , received by the Central Goverrument on 5-11-2008 .

[No. L- 12012/305 /2002 - IR (B - 1 ) ] AJAY KUMAR. Desk Oflicer "Whether the action of the management of Chandigarh Telecoin District in terminating the services of Shri Habib Mohd. , S/ o Mohd. Saddique, ex-daily wage Driver in the office of DEP ( E - IOB ), 5104

DE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 29. 2008/AGRAHAYANAS,

ANNUDE

New Delhi,

$.0. 3159. et Section si the

Goverment hereby put the mand het BEFORE SHRE GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA PRESPUNGFUCER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALUUNAL CUM- LABOUR CONCL CHANDIGARE

CaseNo. 10. 17/2003

Shri Rake

Smi Kesian, ..

Industrial Disputes Act.14 1971 tiral 2004, of The Central Comm. icon- Babur Cont, No Chundarlathorn in the Aver m the Industrial Depire beren Northern Ita imay, undit weedin How

Versus

MATUMAR . Dek (1) SiNAK !

TWDOGE SURGIAN PERAKUMAR SHAKALA FRESIDING OFFICER CE GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNACO : KT-H j

i',:.

haram Pas

Shand . F.O. Go

3052

The Dusiocal R

DRM Comph A.A

!".

! 1

rahe Management:

VARD

١٠٠ :

Sea

CentralGovemdrift iz

retit

2772003 IR (B- drree 2016rer the foliowing dispute

calle !

ismaragen P.RV

"Whether the a . im Northern Rail

services of Steel

legal If not, talked

2.None is pres

counsel for the men

: SHARMA

ad on this ad

referred by the Com called several times

have no aption eden

wkqman in reference

reference to the Center:

the reterence filte

Government he inf

Changarh,

21-10 %

कार को 11-28

یا

का. आ. 3160 , (1947 कः ॥५ ) र्याल एवं कश्मीर बैंक लि 6305 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

reference is returned as such. Let the Central Govemment be informed File be consigned. Chandigarh.

8-10-08 GK SHARMA, Presiding Officer कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक अधिकरण नं.- । चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 293/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 05-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर, 2008 [सं. एल-12012/200/2000- आई.आर. ( ची-1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 5th November , 2008

का.आ. 3161 ,--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध निग्ोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औधोगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. -1 चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 72/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 05-11-2005 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।

S.O. 3160. ln pursuance of Section 17 of the Industial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No293 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure . in the industrial Dispute between the managernent of J &K Bank Ltd., and their workmen , received by the Central Govemment on 5-11-2008.

[सं. एल-22012/200/2006 आईआर(सी एम-11 ] अजय कुमार गौड़. डेस्क अभिकारो

New Delhi , the 5th November , 2008 [No. L- 12012/200 /2000-IR (B- 1 ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT-IL, CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D. 293/2000

S.O. 3161. In pursuance of Section 17 of th:: Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.72/2007 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunat- cum- labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 05-11-2008.

Shri Navin Chopra C/o Tek Chand Sharma, 25 Sant Nagar, Civil Lines , Ludhiana

No. L-22012/200/2006 - IR ( CM - 110 ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer ....Applicant

Versus

ANNEXURE

...Respondent

The Chief Manager, Personnel , J & K Bank Ltd. , Central Office, Srinagar .

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT-J , CHANDIGARH

APPEARANCES

None

Case No. I.D. 72/2007 For the workınan:

For the Management. Shri Ashutosh Vajpayee . Sh. Mitha Singh son of Shri Chand Singh, V&PO : Dugat

Applicant

Kalan, Patiala.

AWARD

Versus

Passed on 8-10-2008

(1) The District Manager , Fond Curporation of India. Patiala(Punjab).

Central Govt . vide notification No. L- 12012/200/2000- IR(B - 1 ), dated 16-8-2000 , has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

(2) The Senior Regional Manager , Food Corporation of India, Punjab Region 31 -A, Chandigarh

Respondents

APPEARANCES

For the workman :

Workman in person .

"Whether the action of the management of J &K Bank Led in terminating the services ofShri Navin Chopra Sto Shri Rajinder Chopra without issuing hin any notice/ Charge sheet is legal and just ? If not , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled ? "

Shri Parminder Singh Advocate

For the Management :

AWARD

Passed on 18th of October 2008 at Patiala Camp

Central Government vide notification No. L -22012 200/2006- IR (CM- II ) , dated 23-4-2007. has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

2.None is present on behalf ofthe workman . Learned counsel for the management is present. The reference was referred by the Central Government in the year 2000. Case called several times . It is already 1.15 pm . At this stage, I have no option otherwise then to dismiss the claim of workman in reference for non - prosecution and return the reference to the Central Govt as such . Accordingly, the Per il Se THE GAZETTE OF INDIA NOVEMBER 29 , 2008 AGRAHAYANAS . 19.30

6306

"Whether the action of the mange of Food Coporation of indie in deny ang engadenient of Shri Mitta Singh, contact worker andet Dire Payment System si par with the other is contract workers areas engaged under DPS is legal and jastified ? If not , to what relier is tits wothman entit! . ? "

2. The presetit reference was made by the Central Government on the tailire of conciliation proceedings for adjudication ofthe matter referred in the schedule reterred ahove and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as allegat and invalid.

3 he management turned up and opposes this reference.

4 As per office memorandum: dated 5-9-08,this case was fixed in pre Lok Adalat meeting on 18-10-05 beld in the office premises of Food Corporation si India Mata for its disposal by adopting the mediation and concili מיין mechanism. The workman and the presented shority of the management made a joint statement that rhe management has agreed that as per policy of the its paronent the workman willbe provided with the work as and witch available out of the list of the presem workmen en priority in comptiurice of the florble High Court , New Dethi order dated 15-2-06 . The management has also agreed that while adjusting the workman , it will honour the seaturity list maintained by the department tisell . On this sace the workman willhdraw his reference in luk lat. This statement above was read over and explained te werkiran individually a hadi and he agreed to withdrasa se Lok Adalat . In view of the above , the workman woltaw the presem reference in Lok Adalat . Accordingly, the reference is returned to the Central Government as settled in Lok Adatat . Lemral Governmen be infamned . File be consigned to record.

G. K. SIHARMA. Presiding Officer Chandigarii

13-10-2008 Ganip. Patiala.

नई दिल्ली . 5 नवम्बर , 200

का.आ. 3162. औद्योगिक त्रिबाद आंधन 1947 ( 1947 का ।4 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केोडीयम भारतीय खाद्य निग्रम के प्रवणतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुवंविटि औद्योगिक विवाद में केोभाल सरकार औद्योगिक श्रमिकरण जाण्डीगढ़ संख्या 54-2007 ) কামাল करती है,जो कोन्द्रीय सरकारक11-2008 प्राप्त हुआ ।

[ -22012/191/2006 एम-11 ] अजय कुमार गोदाज अधिकारी New Detka. The 5th November, thus 5.O. 3162. in pursuance of Sectinta 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1447 ) the Central Governmem hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 54/2007 ) of the Cemeal Ciovernment Industial tribunal- cum -1.abour Court 1. t.handigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industural Dispute between the managemem et For Competations of India , and then workman, recents the Central Govern 5-11-2008 .

No.1-22012 2006-12 -iis ΔΙΑΥ KUMAR GAUR.. Dk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRIGYANENDRA KUMARSHARMA. PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOURCOURT- L CHANDIGARH.

Case 1 D. No. 54/2007

Sh . Bhinder Singh So of Shri Gunnial Singh, VAPO .

...Applicant Burado , Patiala. ( Punai

(1 ) The District Manager . Food Corporation of Indi... Patiala (Punja

(2) The Senior Po isual Marager . Food Corporation of India . Punjab kegion . Sector 71 - A . Chandigarh ...Respondenta

APPEARANCES

For the workman :

Workman in person .

Sini Panminder Singh . Advocate For the Management

AWARD

Passed on 18 October , 2008 at Patiala Camp Central Cloversonent vide notification No. 1. - 22012 191/2006-1R ( CM- 111, dated 23-4-2007 has referred the following dispute to is Tribunal for adjudication "Whether the auction of the management of Food Corporation of India in denying engagement of Shti Bhinder Singhs ontract worker under Direc! Payment System at par with the other 105 contract workers already engaged under DPS is legal and justified " if not, to whatrelief is the workanan entitled"?" 2. The present reference was made by the Centa Government on the failure of conciliation proceedings tor adjudication of the matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prased for declaring the action of the management as llegan and invalid

3. The management turned up and opposes this reference .

4.As peroftice memorandum dated 5.998 , this case was fixed in pre 1 ok Adda naceting on 18-10-08 neked in the office premises of Foulkorporation of India. Patiala for its disposal by akluptans; the mediation and conciliation mechanism. The workman and the prescribed authority n the management made a joint statement that the management has agreed that as per policy ofthe di pafreenl the workman will he provided with the work as and when [भाग || खण्ड 3( ii) ]

available out of the list of the present workman on priority in compliance of the Hon'ble High Court, New Delhi order dated 15-2-06. The management has also agreed that while adjusting the workman , it will honour the seniority list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance the workman withdraw his reference in Lok Adalat. This statement above was read over and explained to workman individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdraw his case in Lok Adalat . In view ofthe above, the workman withdraws , the present reference in Lok Adalat. Accordingly, the reference is returned to the Central Government as settled in Lok Adalat . Central Government be informed. File be consigned to record.

G. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer Chandigarh

18-10-2008

Camp Patiala.

नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 3163 , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के चीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. -1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 76/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -22012/196/2006- आई. आर. ( सी एम- II ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 5th November , 2008 5.O. 3163. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 76/2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 5-11-2008.

[No. L-22012/ 196/2006- IR( CM -II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMARSHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT- L,

CHANDIGARH

Case E.D. No. 76/2007

Sh. Pargat Singh son of Shri Chota Singh , V & PO : Shadi Hari Thana, Tehsil Dirba, Sangrur Applicant

Versus

(1 ) The District Manager, Food Corporation of India , Patiala (Punjab).

(2) The Senior Regional Manager , Food Corporation of India, Punjab Region, Sector 31 -A, Chandigarh

Respondents

6307

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8 , 1990

APPEARANCES

None

For the workman :

For theManagement: Shri Parminder Singh, Advocate AWARD

Passed on 18th ofOctober, 2008 at Patiala Camp.

The Central Government vide notification No. L 22012/ 197/2006- IR ( CM - II) , dated 23-4-2007 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in denying engagement of Shri Pargat Singh , contract worker under Direct Payment System at par with the other 105 contact workers already engaged under LIPS is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled ? " 2 Case repeatedly called. Workman is not present . Representative of the management is present . It is informed by representative of the workman that workman has expired. No application has been filed on behalf of the workman for LRs . No claim statement has been filed . Therefore , I have no option but to return the reference as such to the Central Government because the claim, if any has been abated. Central Government be informed. File be consigned to record.

G. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer Chandigarh

18-10-2008

Camp Patiala.

नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 3164,- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. -1, चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 75/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल-22012/ 197/2006- आईआर ( सी एम- [[ ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Dejhi , the 5th November , 2008 S. O. 3164. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 75/2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court No. 1, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workman , received by the Central Government on 5-11-2008 .

[No. L-22012/197/2006- IR (CM- II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer 6308

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29,2008/ AGRAHAYANAS : 930

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SIRIGYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA

reference is icturmeriteatral Government as settled in Lok Adalat. Central Government be informed . File be consigned to record.

6.K. DARMA . Fresiding Oliver PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRALL.GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNALL- COM - LABOUR COURT-1. CHANDIGARH

Chandigarh

18-10-2008

Case I.D. No. 75/2007

Camp Patiala

नई दिल्ली नवम्बर , 2008

Sh . Amrik Singh , Son of Shri Modan Singh , V&PO: Thudar Thana, Tehsil Dirba , Sangrur Applicat

Versus

का.आ. 3165, जिबाद अधिनियम 1447 (1 ) The District Manager, Food Corporation of Indra . Patiala ( Punjab ) .

(2) The Senior Regional Stadaget . Food Corporation India, Punjab Region , Sector 31 -A, Chandigarh Respondents

APPEARANCES

( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा के में कंन्द्रीय सरकार भाद खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र वियों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निविवाद में केंन्द्रीय परकर औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं । नाक चाट ( दर्भ संख्या 70/2007 ) को प्रकाशित की है, जा कल्टीय सवार को को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

For the Workran :

Workman in person .

For theManagement : Shri Parminder Singa , Advocate

[सं. एन-- 2012/ 176/ 2006 - आईआर सीएम अजय कुमार पेड़ , दृस्क अधिकारी AWARD

New Delhi, the Sth November , 2008 Passed on 18th of October , 2008 at Patiala Camp .

Central Government vide notification No.1-20012 191/2006 - IR ( CM - II ) , dated 23-4-2007 . has relersst the following dispute to this Iribunat for adjudication

5. Ο. 3165. Ji pusuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Acl . 1947 114 of 19471 tin: Conical Government hereby publishes the Award Ref . No. 70/2007 ) ofthe Central Cissement Industrial Tribuna !-cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Galigarh ari shown in the Aнпелие. in the Industrial Dispute between the management of lond Corporation of India, and their workman , received by the Central Government 11-2008.

"Whether the action of the management of Feed Corporation of India in denying engagement et Sor Amrik Singh. contract worker under Dorect Payment System at par with the other 105 contract workers already engaged under DPS is legal and justified ? if not , 10 what relief is the workman entitled "? "

No. 1.- 2201262006- IRICM- AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

2. The present reference was made by the Central Government on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication ofthe matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declating the action of the management as illegal and invalid .

BEFORE SHRIGYANENDRAKUMARSHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT-I CHANDIGARH

3. The managemcut turned up and upposes this reference .

Case L.D. No. 70/2007

Sla. Amrika Singh son of Slari Chanan Singh , V & P Shah Hari Thana , Tehsil Dirba , Sangrur ....Applicant

Versus

(1 ) The District Manager , Food Corporation of India. Patiala (Punjah).

(2) The Senior Regional Manager . Food Corporationot India, Punjab Region. Sector 31 -A . Chandigarh ..Respondem

APPEARANCES

For the Workman :

Workman in person .

Suri Parminder Singh . Advocate.

For the Management

AWARD

4.As per aflice memorandum dated 5-9-08 , this case was fixed in Pre Lok Adalat meeting on 18-10-08 held in the office premises of Food Corporation of India , Patiala for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism. The workman and the prescribed authority of the management made a joint statement that the management has agreed that as per policy of the department the workman willbe provided with the work as and winen available out of the list of the present workmen on priority in compliance ofthe Hon'ble High Court , New Delhi order dated 15-2-06 . The management has also agreed that wirile adjusting the workman , it will hopear the seniority list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance the workman withdraw his reference in Lok Adalat This statement above was read over and explained to workman individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdraw his case in Lok Adalat . In view of the above , the workman withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat . Accordingly, the

Passed on 18th of October , 2008 at Patiala Camp. CentralGovt, vide notification No 1-22012/ 176 /2006-1R 6309

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[ भाग [[-खड 3(ii) ]

(CM-11 ), dated 23-4-2007 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in denying engagement of Shri Amrika Singh, contract worker under Direct Payment System at par with the other 105 contract workers already engaged under DPS is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled ? " 2.The present reference was made by the Central Government on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication of the matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid.

3. The management turned up and opposes this reference .

4.As per office memorandum dated 5-9-08, this case was fixed in Pre Lok Adalat meeting on 18-10-08 held in the office premises of Food Corporation of India, Patiala for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism. The worluman and the prescribed authority of the management made a joint statement that the management has agreed that as per policy of the department the workman will be provided with the work as and when available out ofthe list ofthe present workmen on priority in compliance of the Hon'ble High Court, New Delhi order dated 15-2-06.The management has also agreed that while adjusting the workman it will honour the seniority list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance the workman withdraw his reference in Lok Adalal . This statement above was read over and explained to workman individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdraw his case in Lok Adalat. In view ofthe above, the workman withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat. Accordingly , the reference is returned to the Central Govt . as settled in Lok Adalat. Central Govt.he informed , File be consigned to record.

Chandigarh

18-10-2008

GK. SHARMA , Presiding Officer Camp Patiala

नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर , 2008

का. आ. 3166. ओद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.। , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 59/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[भं एल-22012/163/2006 आईआर ( सी एम-0 ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the Sth November , 2008 5. O. 3166,--lin pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 59/ 2007) ofthe Central Government industria] Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 5-11-2008.

[No. L -22012/ 163 /2006- IR(CM - II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM -LABOUR COURT- 1, CHANDIGARH

Case 1.D. No. 59/2007

Sh . Sattu Singh Son of Shri Hari Singh, V & PO: Data Singhwała, Jind. Applicant

Versus

(1 ) The District Manager , Food Corporation of India, Patiala(Punjab)

(2) The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Punjab Region , Sector 31 - A, Chandigarh ...Respondents

APPEARANCES

For theWorkınan:

Workman in person.

Shri Parminder Singh , Advocate. For the Management:

AWARD

Passed on 18th of October 2008 at Patiala Camp .

Central Govt. vide notification No. 1-22012/ 163/2006- IR (CM- 11 ) , dated 23-4-2007 , has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in denying engagement of Shri Sattu Singh , contract worker under Direct Payment System at par with the other 105 contract workers already engaged under DPS is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entided ? " 2.The present reference was made by the Central Government on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication ofthe matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid.

3. The management turned up and opposes this reference.

4.As per office memorandum dated 5-9-08 , this case was fixed in Pre Lok Adalat meeting on 18-10-08 held in the office premises ofFood Corporation of India. Patiala for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism. The workman and the prescribed authority of the management made a joint statement that the managemem has agreed that as per policy ofthe department 6310

PS ( 1 ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA NOVEMBER 29, 2008 AGRAHAYANA 8 , 1930

the workinan will be provided with the work as and when available out of the list of the present werkmen or out in compliance ofthe Hon'ble High courr Nea Delt : 0. dated 15-2-16 , 1 he management hus also agreed that w adjusting the worksman it will honour the seniorny st maintained by the department itself. Con this assurance the workman withdraw his reference in lok Adalat . 11: statement above was read over and explained to wurktne individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdraw his case 11 . Lok Adalat. In view of the above, the workman withd the present reference in I ok Adaiat . Accordingly reference is returned to the Central Govt. as settled in 1 . Adalat , Central Govt . be informed. File be consigned to record

Chandigaris

G.K SHARMA . Presiding Dic 18-10-2008 Camp Pauala

ईदिल्ली 5 नवम्बर , 200008

का.आ. 3167 , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1047 का 14 ) को धात 17 को अनुसरण में कंट्रीथ मस्कार भान्नाग खाद्य निगम के प्रबंध के नियोजकों और उनमें कमरों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक त्रिवाद में कंन्द्रीय सरक औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.। चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सध 63/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करदी है . जा कन्द्रीय सरकारका 05-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एन्न-22012/131-2006 आई आर. सीएम 11.1 अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिका New Delhi, the 5th November, 2008 S.O. 3167. In pursuance of Section 17 of the ndustrial Dispulses Act 1947 ( 14 of 1947. the Centiti Government Feret , pablishes the Award (Ref No. 2007 ) of the Central GovernmentIndustrial Jubunal- com- i.abour Court No. 1. Chandigarh as shown in the Annevare in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India , and their workmen , received by the Cemral Government on ( 15-11-2008.

[No. L- 22012 / 131 /2006-18 ( 1 AJAY KUMAR GAL'R , Desk Offic ANNEXURE

BEFORE STIRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA. PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURTL CHANDIGARH

Case L.10 No. 63/2007

Sh . Balwant Singh Son of Shri Joginder Singh . V& Gurthali, Jind. ....Applicat

Versus

( 1) The District Manager , Food Corporation of hidin Patiala (Punjab)

Respondents APPEARANCES

دون n person . Sha Farrunder Singh .

For theworkman ; For the Management :

AWARD

Passed on 18th ofOcube , 2008 Patiala Camp .

Central CGovt . videnonia 312201213120000 if ( CM - II ) , dated 23-4-2007 a retered the following dispute to this Tribuna for adjudication

"Whether the action at the management vs load Corporation of Inde denyang engagestictit of Shri Balwant Singh.commmmerwoskerunder Direct Payment System ot par with the other 10GS comrart workst aiready engaged under DPS is legal and justified ? !! not , to what relief is the workman enionled " 2. The present releon was made by the Central Government on the failure of concidenon proceedings for adjudication of the matter werd in the schedule referred ehove and the workman prased in delaang the action of the management as illegal sd insplisi

3 The management reference. end up and oppose.1h1 4. As per office mensandan dated 5-9-08 , this cits نا was fixed in Pre Lok Adidat meg on 18-10-08 held in the office premises of Food puration of India, Patiala - disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism . The workin.nams the prescribed authority of the management made joint statement that the management has agreed that as per polies of the department the workman will be provided with the work and when available out of the list of the present workanan da pekorits in compliance of the Hon'ble High Court. New Delhi order dated 15-2-06 . The management has also agreed that wil adjusting the workman it will notour the senority dist maintained by the departmem itsell On this assurance the workman withdraw his reference in Lok Adakan . Th statement above was read and explained to workmar individually in Hindi andthe teed to withdraw his sense in Lok Adalat. In view of love the workogan wehdess the present reference in Adalat Accordingly , the reference is returned to the most, as settled in tok Adalat. C'entral Govt h, intermed the be consigned to record.

Chandigarh 18-10-2008

G.K SHARMA . Trestding Oilbeer Camp Patiala 6311

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[ भाग 1] -खण्ड 3(ii) )

नई दिल्ली, 5 नवम्बर , 2008

Janta Singh, contract worker under Direct Paymment System at par with the other 105 contract workers already engaged under DPS is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entired? "

2. The present reference was made by the Central Government on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication ofthe matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid.

का, आ. 3168, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का ( 4 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में कंन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 41/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

3. The management turned up and opposes this reference.

[सं. एल-22012/129/2006- आईआर ( सीएम-II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 5th November , 2008

S.O. 3168. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 41/2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 5-11-2008.

[No. L-22012/ 129/ 2006 - IR( CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- L, CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D. 41/2007

4. As per office memorandum dated 5-9-2008 this casewas fixed in Pre Lok adalat meeting on 18-10-2008 held in the office premises of Food Corporation of India, Patiala for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism . The workman and the prescribed authority of the management made a joint statement that the management has agreed that as per policy of the department the workman will be provided with the workas and when available out of the list of the present workınan on priority in compliance of the Hon'ble High Court New Delhi order dated 15-2-2006. The management has also agreed that while adjusting the workman , it will honour the seniority list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance the workman withdraw his reference in Lok Adalat. This statement above was read over and explained to workman individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdraw his case in Lok Adalat in view of the above, the workinan withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat . Accordingly the reference is returned to the Central Government as settled in Lok Adalat . Central Government be informed. File be consigned to record.

Sh. Janta Singh Son of Shri Jaggar Singh V & PO: Khadial Thana, Sunam , Sangrur .

Chandigarh

Applicant

18-10-2008

Versus

G. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

Camp Patiala

(1 ) The District Manager , Food Corporation of India, Patiala, (Punjab) .

नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर , 2008 (2) The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Punjab Region , 31 - A, Chandigarh .

...Respondents

APPEARANCES

For the workman

: Workman in person.

For the management : Shri Parminder Singh,

Advocate

का. आ. 3169. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में कंन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.। , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 66/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

AWARD

Passed on 18th ofOctober, 2008 at Patiala Camp.

[सं. एल -22012/ 134/2006 - आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 5th November, 2008 Central Government vide notification No. L- 22012/ 129/2006 ( IR) (CM - II) , dated 23-4-2007 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

0585GG1/0815

S.O. 3169.--In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central "Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in denying engagement of Shri THE GAZETTE OF INDIARRER 29,2008 AGRAHAYANAS 1930

ver S --

hereby publishes the Avant Ri 的

2007atra Government Industria

urt No. 1. Chandigarh as show inwar

in the Pustrial Dispute between the manageri...

Corporationdra, and their workmen , recise

Citra Goveenident on 5-11-2008.

[No. L-22012/ 13406 1

AJAY KUMAR GAVED

ANNEXURE

BFIORE SURE GYANENDRA KUMAR SA PALDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNY

ND NIR TRIBUNAL- CUM LABO

CHANDIGARI

Cast 1. D. No. 66/2007

Saraef Shri Mehar Singh & P

4 As per office memorandun 5.0.2 h case was fixed in Pre Lok Adalet ngon hrin in the office prenties of foedpadd Patiala for its disposal by adopting ze media בינט conciliation mechan'sno. The ama themescribed ority of the management 3 wint site ! the management has agreed that as per put department the workmar will besenuded with the wuikt . and when available out the list of the present workmer priority in empliance of the song i Delhi der dated is The Garagement has a with agreed that while adjusting the work Geniority les maintamed by he apartment iselt : rance the work aan withdraw his reterenci This statens taresrendovertredeniti beworkman individuali Hinduand he murcedhendr hain Lok Adala ir, videalne, the w wathdraw the present Ailalas, AccoImgi.. the retornis remade Central Govern Los Anlat Conchefo

niehe comigned to record.

Verst's

Chandigarh

nager, Food Corporate

CaenPatia

GK . SHARMA, Ph Trevioral Manager, Food C Ind . Regici . , 31-4 . Chandiga

APPEARANCES

का

. आ. 3170 , अधिनिय : Workian its perso

(1947 का 14 ) की धारा 1 काकी

Shri Paminde

Λάνοτοτε

AWARD

बीच, अनुनन्ध में निर्दिश औद्यागिक विवाद में आंवकरण नं । चंडीगढ़ के संदर्भ

Passed ofOctober, 2001

खानिगम के प्रबंधकों और उनक आन है, जो कन्द्रीय कारको

werelem vid, noct

सं एल 1:: 1 this fribumi for j

action of τις παπά

flelia su denying engagemen

New Desh: the 3thNovemise א ntract worker wider

3170 ... Parsance

ged under DPS is legad at relief is the workman e

Goverment hereby puristes Ar

the Ceрсі остbar.c Gent reference was tale bid .

themise of concllistica p

hindus al Dispar

mares referred in the scheue

Corporation of dis

mas prayed for decla int

wwwived by the Cena

danlegul and invalid .

02 :

ne nanagement turned up and

AIM UMAR

reference.

[ भांग [ I-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

6313

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT DUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT , CHANDIGARH

Case L.D. No. 65/2007

Sh . Balbir Singh son of Shri Pal Singh. V & Pr: Kisangarh Charachon , Teh, Samana, Patiala

Applicant

Versus

Delhi order dated 15-2-2006 . The management has also agreed that while adjusting the workman, it will honour the seniority list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance the workman withdraw his reference in Lok Adafat. This statement above was read over and explained toworkman individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdraw his case in Lok Adalat . In view ofthe above, the workman withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat. Accordingly, the reference is returned to the Central Covement as settled in Lok Adalat . Central Government be intorned. File be consigned to record.

Chandigarh

18/10/2008

(1 ) The District Manager , Food Corporation of India, Patiala, (Punjab).

(2)The Senior Kegiatmal Manager . Food Corporation of India ,Punjab Region, 31 -A, Chandigarh.

..Respondents

APPEARANCES

For the workтал : Workman in person.

For the management : Shri Parminder Singh Advocate

AWARD

Passed on 18th of October, 2008 at Patiala Camp.

Central Government vide notification No. L -22012/ 187/2006- IR ( CM - II ), dated 23-4-2007 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in denying engagement of Shri Balbir Singh, contract worker under Direct Payrnment System at par with the other 105 contract workers already engaged under DPS is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled? " 2. The present reference was made by the Central Governraent on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication ofthe matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of themanagement as illegal and invalid.

3. The management turned up and opposes this Teference.

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर , 2008

का. आ. 3171. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औधोगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. ] , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 48/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [ सं. एल-22012/175/2006- आईआर सीएम -11 ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 5th November , 2008 S.O. 3171. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No : 48/ 2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, inthe Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India , and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 5-11-2008 .

[No. L-22012/ 175/2006 - JR( CM - I[ j AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT- I CHANDIGARH

Case I.D. No. 48/2007

Sh. Birbal Singh son of Shri Chanan Singh V & PC): Jhaloor, ThanaSangrur .

Applicant 6314

TIF. GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29 , 2008/AGRAHAYANA 8, 1930

Versus

( 1 ) The District Manager , Food Corporation of India, Patiala, (Punjab ).

(2) The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation ofladia . Punjab Region, 31 -A, Chandigarh

PART I -SEC. 3 (6 ) ] settled in Lok Adalat . Central Loveminent be inforced . File be consigned to record.

Chandigarh 18/10/2008

Camp Patiala

G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, नवम्बर , 2008

Respondents

APPEARANCES

For the workman

Workman in person .

For the management Shri Parninder Singh Advocate

AWARD

Passed on 18th of October, 2008 at Patiala Comp Central Goverment vide notification No. L -22012 175 /2006 - JR ( CAM - th, dated 23-4-2007 bas referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the managemem ol Food Corporation of India in denying engagement of Shri Birbal Singh , contract worker under Direct Payme System at par with the other 105 contract workers already engaged under DPS is legal and justified ! H not, to what relief is the workman entitled ? " 2. The present reference was made by the Central Government on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication of the matice referred in the schedule referei above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid,

3. The manageinent turned up and opposes this reference .

4 As per cifice memoranduin dated 5-9-2008 this case was fixed in P're lok Adalat meeting on 18-10-2008 held in the office premises of Food Corporation ot tudia , Patiala for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism The workman and the presered authority of the management made ajoint statement tha!! the management has agreed that as per policy of the department the workman will be provided with the work as and when available out of the list of the present man on priority in complians ofthe Hon'ble High Court . New Dathi onder dated 15-2-2006. The managemen has also agreed thatwhile acrusting the workman , on will hounurine seniority list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance the workman withdraw his reference un Lok Adalat. This staternent above was read over and explained toworkman individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdraw his case in Lok Adajat in view of the above , the workman withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat . Accordingh the reference is returned to the L'entral Government an का. आ. 3172, आद्योगिक वित्राव अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारिय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संचद्ध नियाजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्यानि विवाद में कन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. । , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 73/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार करे 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-220121942 ( आईआर ( सीएम- II ! अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , ' ise 5th November , 2008 S... 3172.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 73/2007 ) ofthe Central Government hidustrial Tribunat - cam - Labour Court , No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute herseen the management of Food Corporation of India , and their werkman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 5-11-2008

[No. 1.-22012/ 99-2000-1R ( CM - In AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer

ANNEXUREF.

BEFORE SHIRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT- I, CHANDIGARII

Case LD . No. 73/2007

Sh . Balwinder Singh son of Shri Harngek Singh V & PC. Badalgarh, Sangrur

Applikam ( 1) The District Manage Food Corporation ot india , Patiala, (Punjab ) .

( 2 ) The Senior Regionet Manager . Food Corporation of india . Punjab Region . 31 -A . Chandigarh.

...Respondents 6315

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

{ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

APPEARANCES

Forthe workman : Workman in person.

For the management : Shri Parminder Singh Advocate

AWARD

Passed on 18th ofOctober , 2008 at Patiala Comp.

Central Government vide notification No. L- 22012/ 199/2006 ( IR) (CM- II ) , dated 23-4-2007 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in denying engagement of Shri Balwinder Singh , contract worker under Direct Payment Systern at par with the other 105 contract workers already engaged under DPS is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?"

2. The present reference was made by the Central Government on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication ofthe matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid.

3. The management turned up and opposes this reference ,

4. As per office memorandum dated 5-9-2008 this case was fixed in Pre Lok Adalat meeting on 18-10-2008 held in the office premises of Food Corporation of India, Patiala for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism . The workman and the prescribed authority of the management made a joint statement that the management has agreed that as per policy of the department the workman will be provided with the work as and when available out of the list of the present workman on priority in compliance of the Hon'ble High Court New Delhi order dated 15-2-2006 . The management has also agreed that while adjusting the workman , it will honour the seniority list maintained by the department itself. On this ssurance the workornan withdraw his reference in Lok Adalat . This statement above was read over and explained workman individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdraw his case in Lok Adalat in view of the above , the workman withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat . According the reference is returned to the Central Government as Satled in Lek Adalat . Central Government be inforced. File be consigned to record.

GK . SHARMA , PresidingOfficer Chandigarh

18-10-2008

Camp Patiala

नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर , 2008

का, आ, 3173.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निग‌म के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औधोगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदर्भ सं. 40/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/ 128/2006-आईआर ( सोएम-11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 5th November, 2008 5.0. 3173-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 40/ 2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management ofFood Corporation of India , and their workman , which was received bythe Central Government on 5-11-2008.

[No. L-22012/ 128/2006- IR (CM -II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

CaseNo. 1.D.40/2007

Sh . Harbilash Singh son of Shri Harmek Singh V & PO : Badalgarh Sangrur

Applicant

Versus

( 1 ) The District Manager,

FoodCorporation of India, Patiala, (Punjab ) ,

(2) The Senior Regional Manager , Food Corporation of India, Punjab Region , 31 -A, Chandigarh .

Respondents

APPEARANCES

: Workman in person. For the workman

For the management : Shri Parminder Singh Advocate AWARD

Passed on 18th of October, 2008 at Patiala Camp.

Central Government vide notification No. L -22012/ 128/2006 ( IR) (CM - 11) , dated 23-4-2007 has referred the followingdispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .

6316

THE OWLIFE OF INDIA NOVEMBER 29 2008 AGRAHAYANAS

:..

New Dulbi 2001

Givernment hereby publi heward Ref . No. 38

5.0. 3174of Section 17 t Inslustrial Disputes e Veneal 20f the Central Governantral Tribuna

1.ahour Court, No. Chandle Whether the astion of the managetical of lond Corporation of laudes in denying engagnerne ... Shei Hathilovn Singh , contract worker anden Ha... Payrmanent System at par with lite onda 105 cont workers aircady engaged under DPY is legai justified? if not, to mist iglier is Be wore.fi entitled?"

in the Industrial Espeleomentofte Corporation of indused hole

L'entral Loverroenten

2. The present reference was made by the emri Government on tre failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication of the matter refer , ed mihaschedule . above and the werdenar prayed for dechurng the the managerment as illegal and

3. The saanagement rumed alp and eppu ... th.. reference.

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDANG MAI SHARMA PRESIDING OFFICER CABAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUS OUR COURT- L CHANDKLA Case ML. ) 8/2007

Sh. Desa Singh son of Shr: Gara Singh & PO . Jharoor Thana Dirou . Sangrur

.Applica

1) The Dishict Manag... Food Corporation vimus . Patiala, (Punjab ) , Patiala Parati

12; The Senior Reginal Marai . Food Corporation Punjab Region , 31 - Amari .

Respondent .

APPEARANCES

Forthe workmar : marin perbel 4. As per office memorandon dated 5-9-2008 1 case was fixed in Pre Lok Adalar meeting on 16-08 held in the affice premises of Food Corporation Patiala for its disposal by adopting the redisio conciliation mechanism. The workman and the presid authority of the management made a joint stares at the management has agred thai as per policy department theworl.man will be provaded with the w and when available out of the list of the present worl... on priority in compliance or the Hon'ble Eligh Con Vs. Delhi order datxi 15-2-2006 . The management ats agreed that while adjusting the workman , it will los0г seniority list maintained by the department itself. OF . assurance the workman withdraw his referencu in ros Adalat . This statement above was read over and epleted to workman individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdr his cas ir iok Adalat a view of the above, the worknu withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalan Accordiнд the refcrunce is returned to the Central Governmen settled in Lok Adalar. Central Government be alime File be consegned to record .

For the management dader Sangh Adhocal Chandigarh

18-10-2008

AWARD Passed on 18th of October 2008 at Patiala Camp.

C.K. SHARMA, Presiding liker नई दिल्ली, नवम्बर , 2008

Central Governmcolicatoon No. L- 2202 126/2006 ( IR ) ( CM- 11 ) , dat 24-4-2007 has referred the following dispute to this Titan for adjudication:

"Whether the action to the management of Fand Corporation of Inilangagement of Shii Desa Singh. contander Direct Paymen System at par with the 195 cucaract workers already engaged unde silegal and justified , not , to what relief is the workin emitted " का.आ. 3174, औधोगिक विवाद अधिनियम 193 ( 1947 का ( २ ) गाग के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय भारतीय खाद्य निगम प्रबंधन संबद्ध नियोजकों और कर्मकारों के बोच, अनुबन्ध में विदिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में इन् सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण । चंडीग के चाट संदर्भ 35/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को को प्राप्त हुआ था:

[ सं. एल 22012126/2006 आईआर सोभ अभय कुमार गौड़ , इन्क आएकर

2. The present reference was made by the Central Government on the failure of congiisation proceedings lin Sjukheation of the matice tid he schedule referred above and the workaman prasad for declaring the autono The Managerment as illegal and ima [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

6317 भारत का राजमत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

ANNEXURE

3. The management turned up and opposes this reference .

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOURCOURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

CaseNo. I.D. 51/2007

Sh. Raja Singh son of Shri Maru Singh V & PO : Dugal Kalan , Patiala

..Applicant

Versus

( 1) The District Manager, FoodCorporation ofIndia, Patiala, (Punjab).

(2) The Senior Regional Manager . Food Corporation of India, Punjab Region, 31 -A, Chandigarh .

...Respondents

APPEARANCES

For the workman : Workman in person .

4. As per office memorandum dated 5-9-2008 this case was fixed in Pre Lok Adalat meeting on 18-10-2008 held in the office premises of Food Corporation of ludia, Patiala for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism. The workman and the prescribed authority of the management made a joint statement that the management has agreed that as per policy of the department the workman will be provided with the work as and when available out of the list of the present workmen on priority in compliance of the Hon'ble High Court New Delhi order dated 15-2-2006 . The management has also agreed that while adjusting the workman , it will honour the seniority list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance the workman withdraw his reference in Lok Adalat . This statement above was read over and explained to workman individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdraw his case in Lok Adalat, In view ofthe above , the workman withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat . Accordingly the reference is returned to the Central Government as settled in Lok Adalat . Central Government be informed. File be consigned to record.

For the management : Shri Parminder Singh Advocate

AWARD

Chandigarh

18-10-2008

Passed on 18th of October, 2008 at Patiala Camp, G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer

Central Government vide notification No. 1. - 22012/ 190/2006 ( IR ) (CM - II ) , dated 23-4-2007 has reterred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

नई दिल्ली, 5 ननम्बर , 2008

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in denying engagement ot Shri Raja Singh , contract worker under Direct Payment System at par with the other 105 contract workers already engaged under DPS is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled? י का. आ. 3175. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 51/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/190/2006- आईआर ( सीएम-1 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

3.The management turned up and opposes this reference.

New Delhi , the 5th November, 2008

S.O. 3175. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 51 2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management ofFood Corporation of India , and their workman received by the Central Government on 5-11-2008 .

[No. L-22012/ 190/2006 - IR ( CM - I !) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer

PART II SEC. 3 ( ⅱ ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29, 2008 /AGRAHAYANA 8 , 14.30

seniority list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance the workman withdraw his reference m Lok Adalat . This statement above was read over and explained to workman ndividuallyin Hindi and he agreed to witi : di aw his case in Lok Adalat . In view of the above , the workman withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat . Accordingly the reference is returned to the Central Governmetut as settled in Lok Adalat. Central Government be indeaned. Filebe consigard to record.

Chandigarh

18-10-2008

GK . SHARMA , Presiding Cicer नई दिल्ली, 5 नवम्बर, 2008

का, आ. 3176 , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम १ ९ ३ ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय स्टाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों अंग उनक कर्मकारों के बोन, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योशिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अभिनं । चंडीगढ़ के पंचारसं 44/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ 시 72012171/2006 आईआर अजय कुमार गौड़ , डोक भांपक New Delhi , the 5th November, 2008 5.0. 3176.---In pursuance of Sections the industrial Disputes Act , 1947 114 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereny publishes the award (Ref. No. 4420071 ofthe Central Government industrial Tribunal - cum - sour Court , No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annesore , the Industrial Dispete between the miragernent Corporation of ledia, and their workmen , which was received by the Central CGovernetent on 5-11-2008

[ No 1-2002 71-2006- FRLS WAY KUMAR GALUR. Los Detiver

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHANAYA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNE.NE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALCEM - LABOUR CAMR CHANDIGARH

Case No. L.D. 14/2007

Sh. Ajaib Singh son of Shri Bhagwan Singh S Jhaloor hama , SangTer

Versus

( 1) The District Manager,

Food Corporation of India . Patiala, (Punjab ) .

(2) The Senior Regional Manager ,

Food Corporation of india,

Punjab Region , 31 -A. Chandigarh.

Respondents

APPEARANCES

For theworkman : Work.mati in person

For the management Shri Parminder Singh, Advocate

AWARD

Passed on 18th of October. 2008at Patiala Camp Central Governinent vide notification No. 1 ,-22012 171/2006 - IR (CM - II ) , dated 23-4-2007 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudican00 .

"Whether the action of the management of I'nod Corporation of huntia in denying engagement of Shri Ajaib Singh , contract worker under Direct Payment System at par with the other 105 contract workers already engaged under DPS is legal and justified ? [ 1 not, to what reliet is the workman entitled ." 2. The present relerence was made by the Central Government on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication ofthe mazer referred in the schedule refcered above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid

3. The management turned up and opposes this reference.

4. As per office memorandum dated 5-9-2008 this case was fixed in Pre Loi. Adalat meeting on 18-10-2008 held in the office premises of Food Corporation of India , Patiala for its disposa ! by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism the workman and the prescribed authority of the management made a joint statement that the management bas agreed that as per policy of the department the workman will be provided with the work as 7nd when available out of the list of the present workin on priority in compliance of the Hon'ble High Court New Delhi order dated 15-2-2006 . The management hls alsn agreed that while adjusung the workman , it will honour the seniority list maintained by the departament itself. On this assurance the workm wishciraw his reference in tok Adalat . This statement ahve was read over and explained toworkonan individualis find and he agreed 10 wuliass his case in Lok Adalat . 1. view of the above , the workin withdraw the present reference in tok Adalat . Accordingly the reference is returned to the Cemral Government Bettled in Lok Adalai entrat Government be interıned. File be consigned to surd .

Chandigarlt

18-10-2008

CLK SHARMA, Presiding ( Micer 6319

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[भाग 11- खण्ड 3(ii) )

नई दिल्ली, 5 नवम्बर , 2008

referredby the Central Government on the year 2004. Case called several times . It is already 1.15 p.m. At this stage. I have no option otherwise then to dismiss the claim of workman in reference for non - prosecution and return the reference to the Central Government as such . Accordingly, the reference is returned as such . Let the Central Governmentbe informed. File be consigned.

Chandigarh 21-10-2008

GK . SHARMA , Presiding Officer का.आ. 3177, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार शुगरकेन ब्रीडिंग इन्स्टीट्यूट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके दर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. । चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदर्भ सं. 135/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर , 2008 [सं. एल -42012/46/2003-आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 5th November , 2008

का.आ. 3178,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विषाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 60/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो कंन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

चं. एल-22012/ 162/2006- आई आर ( सीएम -1 [ 0 ] S.O. 3177.-in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 135/ 2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure . in the Industrial Dispute between the the management of Sugarcane Breeding Institute, and their workmen, received bythe Central Governmenton 5-11-2008.

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी [No. 1-42012/46/2003-1R(CM- II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer

New Delhi , the 5th November , 2008 ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. I. D. No. 135/2004

S.O. 3178.In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Rel . No. 60/2007 ) ofthe Central Government industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour CourtNo. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India , and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 5-11-2008.

Strí Jaimal, Son of Shri Dharam Singh Village- Samora, Po- Kheri Man Singh, Distt . Karnal . ....Applicant

[No. L-22012 / 162/ 2006- IR ( CM - 11 )| AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Olicer Versus

ANNEXURE

The Head, Sugarcane Breeding Institute , Regional Centre, Agarsain Marg , Karnal 132001 . ...Respondent

APPEARANCES

None

For the Workman:

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. 1. D. No. 60/2007 For the Management : Shri Amit Sharma, Advocate

AWARD

Shri Jarnail Singh , Son of Shri Pilla Singh V & PO: Jhallor The Dirba . Sangrur. ...Applicant Passed on 21-10-2008

Versus

(1 )The District Manager , Food Corporation of India, Patiala . (Punjab).

Central Government vide notification No. L-42012/ 46/2003 - IR ( CM - II ) , dated 4-03-2004 , has referred the followingdispute to this tribunal for adjudication :

(2) The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Punjab Region , 31 -A Chandigarh ...Respondem

APPEARANCES

For the Workman

Workman in person

For the Management : Shri Parminder Singh. Advocate "Whether the action of the management of Sugarcane Breeding Institute in not granting temporary status and also non - regularising of service of Sh . Jaimal S/o. Sh . Dharam Singh w.e.r. 4-7-1981 is legal and justified? Ifnot , to what relief the workman entitled ton

AWARD

Passed on 8th of October 2008 at Patiala Camp 2.None is presem on behalfofthe workman. Learned counsel for the management is present . The reference was 632

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29, 2008 /AGRAHAYANA 8, 1930

Central Government vide notification No. L- 22012/ 162/2006R CM - 11 ) , dated 23-04-2007 , has reterred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in denying engagement of Shri Jarnail Singh, contract worker under Direct Payment Systera at par with the other 105 contract workers already engaged under DPS is legal and justified ? Ifnot, to what relief the workman entitled to ?

2. The present seference was made by the Central Government on the failure ofconciliation proceedings for adjudication ofthe matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workınan prayed for declaring the action of the manager merit as illegal and invalid.

reference. The management turned up and oppetes this 4. As per office memorandun: dated 5-9-2008, inis case was fixed im pre Lok Aualat meeting or . 160-2008 held in the tice prernises of Food porain of ladis Patiala to disposal by adopting the mediation and cosicilianhanism . The workman and the prescribed ambority of the roanagemen made a joint statement that the management has agreed that as per policy of the department the workman will be provided with the work as and when available out of the list of the post warmen on priority in repliance of the Hon'bie High ourt iNew Delhi order dated 15-2-2006. The managerment la siso agreed at while adjusting the workman it with honour the seniority list maintained by the departen elt this assurance we workman withdraw his reference in Lok Adalal. This statement above was read over and explained to workerar individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdraw his case in Lox nuatat in view of the sowwe , the workman withdraw the present reference in Lok dalat . Accordingly the reference is returned to thelovemment as sertt -d in Loi Adalar. Central Govecat ce informed File ba consign d to react- 1.

Chandiga in 1-1-200

ईमेली , 5 मव-३ ,

३११२ ओद्योगिक वा अधिनियम 1947 कोपरा के अनुसरण में कंन्द्रीत सकार भारती तंत्र के संबद्ध नियाजकों और उनह वार्मकारों के औद्योगिक विवाद में केंद्रीय अद्योगिक अधिक नं. , अण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट संदर्भ ) को शतक है, शेष सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्র :

एल-22012/189: 2006-आई आर ( सीएग-1) ]

अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी

[PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] New Delhi , the 5th November, 2008 8.0. 3179. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 69/ 2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. 1. Chandigarh has shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workanen , received by the Central Government on 5-11-2008.

[No. L-22012/ 189/2006- IR( CM- II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHIKI CYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT-I , CHANDIGARH.

Case No. 1. D. N ... 69/2007

Shri Soma Singh, Son or Muktiar Singh V & PO: Kahangarh Gharachen Patiala, Punjab) plicant

Vusus

( 1) TheDistrict Marager, Food Corporation of India, Patiala, (Punjab). Patiala

(2) The Senior Regions Manager Food Corporation of India, Punjab Region . 31 - A Chandgark Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the Workman: Workman in person,

For the Management : Shri Panminder Singh Advocate . AWARD

Passed on 18th of October 2008 at Patiala Camp Central Cloveminent vide notification No L- 22012/ 189/2006- IR (CM- II ) . dated 23-4-2007 has referred the followingdispute to this Triinunal for adjudication :

"Whether the action of the managemen, of Food Corporation of India in denying engagement of Shri Soma Singh , Contract wise under Unrect Payment System at par with the other 105 contract workers already engage i under OPS is legal and justified? It not, towhat relief's the wurkman entitled?

2. The present reference was made by the t'entral Govt. on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication ofthe matter referred in the schedule tired above and the workman prayed for deciaring the aution of the management as illegal and invalrd .

3. The management uned up opposes this reference.

4. As per office memorandum dated -9-108 , this case was fixed in pre Lok Adalet inceting en 18-10-2003 held in the office premises of d Coperation of India Patiala for 6321

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8, 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mochanism . The workman and the prescribed authority of the management made a joint statement that the management has agreed that as per policy ofthe department the workman will be provided with the work as and when available out of thelist ofthepresent workamen on priority in compliance of theHon'ble High Court New Delhi order dated 15-2-2006. The management has also agreed that while adjusting the worksman itwill honour the seniority list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance the workman withdraw bis reference in Lok Adalat. This statemnt above was rend over and explained to workman individually in Hindi and he agreedto withdraw his case in Lok Adalat. In view of the above, the workman withdraw the present refence in Lok Adalat. Accordingly the reference is retruned to the Central Government as settled in Lok Adalat . Central Government be informed. File be consigned to record.

Chandigarh.

18-10-2008

O.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 5 नवम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 3180, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केंन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.। चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 45/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/172/2006 - आई आर (सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 5th November, 2008 S.O. 3188.In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Governmenthereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 45/ 2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh has shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on5-11-2008.

[No. L-22012/ 172/2006- IR(CM - 11 )] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1 ,

CHANDIGARH

Case No. L. D. 45/2007 .

Shri Parkash Singh , Son of Nek Singh V & PO: Karnail ,

.....Applicant Sangrur.

Versus

(1)The District Manager, Food Corporation ofIndia, Patiala, (Punjab), Patiala (Punjab).

(2) The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Punjab Region, 31 - A Chandigarh ...Respondent APPEARANCES

For the Workman : Workman in person.

For the Management Shri Parminder Singh Advocate.

AWARD

Passed on 18th of October , 2008 at Patiala Camp Central Government vide notification No. L- 22012/ 172/2006 ( IR (CM- II ), dated23-4-2007 has referred the following dispute to his Tribunat for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the mariagerment of Food Corporation of India in denying engagement of Shri Parkash Singh , Contract worker under Direct Payment System at per with the other 105 contract workers already engaged under DPS is legal and justified? It not, towhat reiief is the workman entitled?

2.The present reference was made by the Central Government on the failure of concillation proceedings for adjudication ofthe matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid..

3. The management turned up opposes this reference.

4. As per office memorandum dated 5-9-08, this case was fixed in pre lok adalat meeting on 18-10-2008 held in theoffice premises ofFood Coporation of india Patiala for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism. The workman and the prescribed authority of the management made a joint statement that the management has agreed that as per policy of the department the workman will be provided with the work as and when available out of the list of the present workmen on priority in compliance ofthe Hon'bie High Court New Delhi order dated 15-2-2006. The management hus all agreed that while adjusting the workman it will honour the seniority list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance the workman withdraw his reference in Lok Adalat. This statement above was read over and explained to workman individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdraw his case in Lok Adalat . In view of the above, the workman withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat . Accordingly the reference is returned to the Central Government as settled in Lok Adalat. Central Government be informed. Filebe consigned to record.

Chandigarh.

18-10-2008

G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer 6322

DII GAZETTE OF INDIA NOBER 29 , 2008 / AGRAHAYAN18 , 1950

ईदिल्ली नवम्बर, का.आ. 3151 ,--औद्योगिक क्रियाश्रমিলিয়া ৬ এ ( 1947 की 14 ) की जाए । के अनुसरण में कंन्द्रोवनी खाद्य निगम के प्रबंध संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनका अके आद्यागिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक बीच, अनुबन्ध में विदि अधिकरण नं. । चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट प्रकाशित करती है , जं कन्दीय सरकार को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22-12-13-2006- अजय कष्ार गाँड़, कवकाने New Delhi , the Sth November , 20fis S.O. 3181.-In pursuance of Section : the Industrial Disputes Act. 1917 ( 141 19411e vertel Government ! hereby publishes the Award ( 552 2007 of the Central Cernment industria ! Tribuna ! -- Labour Court No. 1. Chandigarh has show en Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute hemeen the management of Food Corporation of ledis as their workmen , received by the Central Cinvertical 5-11-2018

1.-22012 103.2000-10- AJAY KUMAR GAL R. Desk dicer

ANNEXURE

GEFORE SRIROYANENDRA KUMAR SHADA PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOV INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT-1 、 CHANDIGARIT

Case No. 1. D. No. 52.210

Shri Bala Singi . Somol Shr: Karamchand V & PO Sangrur.

Versus

(1 ) The District Manager, Food Corporation of india l'atela (Punjab)

(2 ) The Senin Regional Manager . Tood Corpакамiоn от India, Punjab Region, 31 - A Chandigarh Respondent APPEARANCES

For the Workm ... : Workinara persor

For the Marks. Shri Parmender Singh Ace WARE

Passedor stroferober. Diis ar Patiala Contrai Gevemineri vide neofication No.1-2 193/ 2006- IRCM - idased 25-4-2007 referredthe tal- lowing dupete this Frobal for adjudication "War the action on the management Comparatuur et landhandenying engagement of shri Bala Sumpir. Centre et worker under Direct Pay

PART il : in Sy stuan at par wat , the other 105 contract workers already engaged under TOPS is legal and justifies!! It not, to what re het is the workntan entiled 2. The present reference was made by the Cent Government on the tailure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication ofthe nettet teterred in the schedule retened above and theç workınan puas ad for declaring the ustion of the management as illegal and invalid.

The management turned ap and opposes tinis reference

As per office memorandum dated 5-9-08 . this case was fixed in pre 1 ok last meeting or: 18-10-2008 keld in theoffice premises ofFund Coporation of India Patiala tor its disposal by adoptin , the mediation and conciliation mechanism. The workosar and the prescribed authori the management made a statement that the management has agreed liat as per policy of the department theworkman willbe presided with the work as an alien available out of the list of presern workmen o готу in compliance ofthe Hun bie Sigh Coun. New Dežu order dated 15-2-2006 . Tik maaginent has also agreed thư while adjusting the wothanan it wili henear the seniorns list maintained by the department melt . On this assurance the workman withdraw ads reference in Lok Adalat. Pais statement above was read over and explained to workmon individually in Binh and he agreed to withdraw his case me Lok Adalat In view of the dove the workman witisitasy the present reference in Adalat . Accordingis the reference is returned si t'eneral Governent as settled in Lek Adalat . Ceniral timeramen be informed. File he consigned to record Chandigarh . 18-10-2008

GK . SHARMA. Presiding Office का.आ. 3182 , अधिनियम 104 ( 1947 का 143 की धारा के अनुकंन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय वादा निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र कंपनियों और नवर्या के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट अधिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. । , चण्डोगड के नंदर्भ सं. 10200 को प्रकाशित करती है. जो कंट्रोल को 5-1: 2008 का पप्न हुआ था ।

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकार New Delhi, the Ft November . 2008

S.O. 3182. In pursuance of Section in of the industrial Disputes Act 1947 11 of 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref . No. 10 20071 ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - 1.abour Court No. 1. Chandigal has shown in the Annexure the Industrial Dispute bergeen the waragemem of Irod 6323

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008 /अग्रहायण 8, 1930

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Corporation of India , and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 5-11-2008.

[No. L-22012/173/2006- JR(CM- II)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. 1. D. No. 46/2007

list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance theworkman withdraw his reference in Lok Adalat . This statement above was read over and explained to worknian individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdraw his case in Lok Adalat. In view of the above, the workman withdraw the present reference in Lek Adalat. Accordingly the reference is returned to the Central Govt. as settled in Lok Adalat . Central Govt . be informed. File be consigned to record.

Chandigarh .

18-10-2008

.....Applicant Shri Dharma Singh , Son of Shri Baldev Singh , V & PO: Jhaloor Thana, Tehsil Dirba, Sangrur .

Versus

(1 ) The District Manager, Food Corporation of India, Patiala, (Punjab),

(2) The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Punjab Region . 31 -A Chandigarh ...Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the Workman : Workman in person .

For the Management : Shri Parminder Singh Advocate.

AWARD

Passed on 18th of October 2008 at Patiala Camp.

Central Govt . vide notification No. L- 22012/ 173/ 2006 - IR (CM - II ), dated 23-4-2007 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corparation of India in denying engagement of Shri Dharma Singh , Contract worker under Direct Payment System at par with the other 105 contract workers already enganged under DPS is legal and justified? It not,to what relief is the workman entiled?" 2. The present reference was made by the Central Govt. on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication of the matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid.

3. The management turned up and opposes this reference.

4. As per office memorandum dated 5-9-08, this case was lixed in pre Lok Adalat meeting on 18-10-2008 held in the office premises of Food Coporation of India Patiala for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanisst . The workman and the prescribed authority of the management made a joint statement that the management has agreed that as per policy ofthe department the workman will be provided with the work as and when available out ofthe list of the present workmen on priority in compliance ofthe Hon'ble High Court , New Delhi order dated 15-2-2006 . The management has also agreed that while adjusting the workman it will honour the seniority

G.K. SHARMA , PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 3183 ,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के वीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 67/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/186/2006- आई आर ( सीएम-1 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 5th November, 2008 S.O. 3183.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 67/2007) ofthe Central Government industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh has shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workmen , receivedby the Central Government on 5-11-2008.

[No. L-22012/ 186/2006-1R(CM -II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR. Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. I. D. No. 67/2007

Shri Lachman Singh , Son of Shri Maghar Singh , V & PO: Shadi Hari Thana, Sangrur . ....Applicant

Versus

( 1) The District Manager, Food Corporation of India, Patiala, (Punjab),

(2) The Senior Regional Manager , Food Corporation of India, Punjab Region , 31 -A Chandigarh ... Respondents

APPEARANCES

For the Workman : Workınan in person .

For theManagement: Shri Parminder Singh Advocate.

6324

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA , NOVEMBER 29, 2008/AGRAHAYANA 8 , 1930

AWARD

Passed on 18th of October 2008 at Patiala Camp.

Central Govt , vide notification No. L- 22012/ 186; 2006- JR (CM - II ) , dated 23-4-2007 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in denying engagement of Shri Lachhman Singh , Contract worker under Direci Payment System at par with the other 105 contract workers already enganged under DPS is Iegal an justified? It not , to what relief is the workman entitled 2. The present reference was made by the Central Govt . on the failure of conciliation proceedings in adjudication of the matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invarid .

3. The management turned up and opposes this reference.

4. As per office memorandum dated 5-9-08 , this cas was fixed in Pre Lok Adalat ineeting on 18-10-2008 held the office premises of Food Corporation of India, Patinia for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliatio ! mechanism . The workman and the prescribed authority of the management made a joint statement that the management has agreed that as per policy of the department the workman will be preovided with the work as and wher! available out of the list of the present workmen on priority in compliance of the Hon'ble High Court , New Delhi order dated 15-2-2006 . The management has also agreed that while adjusting the workman it will honour the seniorny list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance the workman withdraw his reference in Lok Adalat. This statement above was read over and explained to workman individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdraw his caseon Lok Adalat . In view of the above , the workman withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat . Accordingly the reference is returned to the Central Govt , as settled in nik Adalat . Central Govt . be informed . File be consignedto record.

Chandigarh. 18-10-2008

G.K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer Camp Patiala

नई दिल्ली, 5 नवम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 3184.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 19 (1947 का 14) को भारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियांजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं, । , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 77/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2000K को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22012/ 194/2006 - आई आर ( सोएम ॥ ] अजय कभार गौड इंस्क अधिकार

[PART 11-SEC. 3( ii)) New Delhi , the 5th November, 2008 S.O. 3184.-in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Contrat Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 77/2007 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workmen , received bythe Central Government on 5-11-08

L-22012 / 194/2006- IR(CM -11 ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Dusk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case I. D. No. 77/2007

Shri Lal Singh, Son of Shri Ajaib Singh , v & PO: Kahangarh . Gharachon , PO: Patran , Teh Samana, Paríala, Punjab. ....Applicant

Versus

( 1 ) The District Manager, Food Corporation of India, Patiala, (Punjab) .

(2) The Senior Regional Manager , Food Corporation of India, Punjab Region , 31 -A Chandigarh ....Respondents

APPEARANCES

For the Workman : Workman in person . For the Management : Shri Parminder Singh , Advocate. AWARD

Passed on 18th of October 2008 at Patiala Camp .

Central Govt. vide notification No. L- 22012 / 194/2006- IR ( CM - 11 ) , dated 23-4-2007 has referred the following dispute to his Tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in denying engagement of Shri Lal Singh , Contract Worker under Direct Payment System at par with the other 105 contract workers already enganged under OPS is legal and justified? It not, to what relief is the workman entitled? " 2. The present reference was made by the Central Govt . on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication of the matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman praved for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid .

3. The managerne turned up and opposés this reference.

4. As per office memorandum dated 5-9-08 , 1his case was fixed in Pre Lok Adalat meeting on 18-10-2008 held in [ भाग 1]- खाण्ड (ii) ]

6325

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

the officepremises of Food Corporation of India, Patiala for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism. The workman and the prescribed authority of the management made a joint statement that the munagerment has agreed that as per policy ofthe department theworkman will be provided with the work as and when available out of the list ofthe present workmen on priority incompliance ofthe Hon'ble High Court , New Delhi order dated 15-2-2006 . The management has also agreed that while adjusting the workman it will honour the seniority list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance the workman withdraw his reference in Lok Adalat . This statement above was read over and explained to workman individually in Hindi and be agreed to withdraw his case in Lok Adalat. In view of the above, the workman withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat . Accordingly, the reference is returned to the Central Govt, as settled in Lok Adalat. Central Govt. be informed. File be consignedto record.

Chandigarh.

18-10-2008.

CampPatiala

G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 5 नवम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 3185.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीय, अनुकन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 37/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -22012/ 125 /2006- आई आर ( सीएम -11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelbi , the 5th November , 2008 S.O. 3185.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 37/ 2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. I , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management ofFood Corporation of India , and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 5-11-2008.

[No. L-22012/ 125/2006- IR( CM -II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT-1 , CHANDIGARH

Case . D. No. 37/2007

Shri Hans Lal , Son of

Shri Jangir Singh, V& PO: Khadial ,

...Applicant TheSunam, Sangrur.

Versus

(1 ) The District Manager, Food Corporation ofIndia, Patiala, (Punjab).

...Respondents (2) The Senior Regional Manager , Food Corporation of India, Punjab Region ,31 -A, Chandigarh.

APPEARANCES

For theWorkman : Workman in person.

For the Management : Shri Parminder Singh , Advocate.

AWARD

Passed on 18th ofOctober 2008 at Patiala Camp.

Central Govemment vide notification No. L-22012/ 125/2006- IR (CM - II ) , dated 23-4-2007 , has referred the following dispute to this tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in denying engagement of Shri Hans Lal , contract worker under Direct Payment System at par with the other 105 contract workers already engaged under DPS is legal and jusdtified ? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled to ?

2. The present reference was made by the Central Government on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication ofthe matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid.

3. The management turned up and opposes this reference.

4.As per office memorandum dated 5-9-2008 , this case was fixed in Pre Lok Adalat meeting on 18-10-2008 held in the office premises of Food Corporation of India , Patiala for itsdisposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism. The workman and the prescribed authority of the management made a joint statement that the management has agreed that as per policy of the department the workman will be provided with the work as andwhen available out of the list of the present workmen -on priority in compliance of the Hon'ble High Court , New Delhi order dated 15-2-2006 . The management has also agreedthat while adjusting the workman, it will honour the seniority list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance the workman withdraw his reference in Luk Adalat. This statement above was read over and explained toworkman individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdraw his case in Lok Adalat in view of the above, the workman withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat, Accordingly, the reference is returned to the Central Government as settled in Lok Adalat . Central Government be informed . Filebe consigned to record.

Chandigarh . 18-10-2008

Camp Patiala

G.K. SHARMA , PresidingOfficer 6326

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMB ! R 29.2008 AGRAHAYANA K

नई दिल्ली, 5 नवम्बर, 200 %

का.आ. 3136. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम ५५ ( 1947 का 14 ) को धारा 17 के अनुसत्म में केन्द्रीय परख्कार भवान खाद्य निगम के एवंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजका और उनक कर्मत बोच, अनुचन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विदाद में कंन्द्रीय सरकार अधिकरण। नं. चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 2007 ) हो प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2005 को प्रल हुआ था । कि [सं. एल-22012165/ 2006 - आर्ट अनुमएस अजय कुमार गौड़ , डरक अंगा New. Dein , the 5th November,2005 S.O. 318%, In pursuance of Section 1 , Industria ! Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Cen Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 50 20 ) of the Central Clovertanian Industrial Tribunal - cionar Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexuгe,mth. Industrial Dispute between the management of ond Corporation of tadia , and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 5-11-2008

[No L-22012-165.2006-11- AJAY KUMAR GAUK, Decker

ANNEXURE.

BEFORE SITRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CLM - LABOUR COURTI, CHANDIGARH

Case No. I. D. No. 56/2007

Shri Binder Singh , Son el

...Applar :

Shri Chanan Singh , V & PO : Jhaloor, Thana, Sangrur

Versus

( 1 ) The District Manager, lood Corporation of India . Patiala, (Punjab).

"Whether the actemre management | Corparation of Iridan denying cogagstment o Shri Binder Singh net weder uales Direct Payinent Syetem alerth the other 105 contrас workers already enged under DPS is legal and justified? It not . 10 ch.r relief is the workran entiled ?

2. The present scherence was made by the Cen Government on the failure of conciliation proceedings lor adjudication of the matter Terred in the schedule refereed above and the workman piaseal for declaring the action ot the management as illegal and invald

3. The managemen turned up opposes this reference .

1. As per office mundion dated 59-08 , this c was fixed in Pre Lok Adalat meeting of 18-10-2008 heid in the office p . comises of Fondation of India , Paula Fon us disposal by adopting tire mediation and concisation mechanism . The worker and the prescribed authority of the management made amoim shhuent that the man Ises agreed that as per poles the deatment the workm will be preovided with the works and when avatarie ou! ofthe list ofthe present wers nen on priority in complaince of the Hon'ble High , New Delhi onder dates! 15-2-2006 . The mana chrent has also agreed that while adjusting the workrnan , 1 will humour the shioon st manitained by the department itself. On this assurance the workman withdraw his eterence in Los Adelat Fis stateinnt above was lead Art zad explained to workman individually in Hindidhe greed to with draw his case in Lok Adalat . In view of the above the worknum withar the present refence in lok Adalat. Accordingly the refernce is retruned to the catral Giovernment as settled in Lok Adalat . Central Government be informed . Faly be consigned to record.

Chandigarh .

18-10-2008

G.K SHARMA. Presiding Officer नई दिल्चर, 2008

...Respondents

(2 ) The Senior Regional Manager . Food Corporation of india , Punjab Region, 31 -A Chandigarh .

APPEARANCES

Forthe Workman : Workman in person .

For the Management : Shri Parminder Singh Advocale .

AWARD

Passed on 18th of October, 2008 at Parsala Comp .

Central Government vide notfication Nu . [. - 22012 : 165/2006- IR ( CM - 11 ), dated 23-4-200 ? has referred the following dispute to his Tribunal for adjudication का.आ. 3187.-- औद्योगिक বিिকার अधिनियम 194 ? ( 1947 का ( 4 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में कंन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय रखाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के मंत्र नियोजकों और उनक, कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्यागिक विवाद में कंन्द्रीय सम्कए औद्यागिक अधिकरण नं. 1. चण्डीगढ़ के पंचार । पंदर्भ सं. 501: 2007 को प्रकाशिन करती है , जां कंन्द्रीय सरकार को 11 2008 का प्रप्न हुआ था [सं. एल-2202 09 :2006 - आई आम ( सीएम ।। अजय कुमार गौड़, इंस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , he Sth November, 2008 S.O. 3187.In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 147 ( 14 of 19:17 ) , the Central Government hereby publi thes the assard Ret. No. 50 20071 ofthe Central Govertonen Cacustrial Jaibunal - cu -laur 6327

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8, 1930

[भाग - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 5-11-2008

[No. L- 22012/ 169 /2006- IR( CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRHI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA.

PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT-1 , CHANDIGARH.

Case No. 1. D. No. 50/2007

Shri Bhola Singh ,

Son of Shui Narata Singh

V& PO: Data,

Singhwała, Jind.

mechanism . The workman and the prescribed authority of the management made a joint statement than the management has agreed that as per policy of the department the workman will be provided with the work as and when available out of the list ofthe present workmen on priority in compliance ofthe Hon'ble High Court, New Delhi order dated 15-2-2006. The management has also agreed that while adjusting the workman . It will honour the seniority list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance theworkman withdraw his reference in Lok Adalat. This statement above was read over and explained 10 workman individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdraw his case in LokAdalat. In view of the above , the workman withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat . Accordingly the teference is returned to the Central Govt . as settled in Lok Adalan . Central Govt. be informed, File be consigned to record .

Chandigarh.

...Applicant

Versus

(1) The District Manager, Food Corporation of India , Patiala, (Punjab), Patiala.

(2) The Senior Regional Manager, FoodCorporation of India, Punjab Region, 31 -A

18-10-2008

G. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर , 2008

Respondents

Chandigarh.

APPEARANCES

For the Workman: Workman in person .

Forthe Management : Shri Parminder Singh Advocate .

AWARD

Passed on 18th ofOctober 2008 at Patiala Camp.

Central Govt . vide notification No. L- 22012/ 169/ 2006 - JR ( CM- II ) , dated 23-4-2007 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corparation of Inida in denying engagement of Shri Bhola Singh , Contract worker under Direct Payment System at par with the other 105 contract workers already enganged under DPS is legal and justified? Ifnot, to what relief is the workman entitled?

2.The present reference was made by the Central Govt . on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication ofthe matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid.

3. The management turned up and opposes this reference.

4. As per office memorandum dated 5-9-08 , this case was fixed irst Pre Lok Adalat meeting on 18-10-2008 held in the office premises of Food Corporation of India , Patiała for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation का.आ. 3188.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. । , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 49/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 कर प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/ 168/2006-आई आर ( सीएम -11 ) 1 अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 5th November, 2008

S.O. 3188.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Govemment hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 49 :2007 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 5-11-2008 .

[No. 1-22012168-2006-18 M AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk ONeer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 . CHANDIGARIL

Case No. J. D. No. 49/2007

Shri Pamma Singh ,

...Applicant Son of Shri Lai Singh, V& PO: Kamail, Sangrur.

6328

[PART 11-- SEC. 3 (0) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29, 2008/ AGRAHAYANA 8, 1930

Versus

(1) The District Manager , Food Corporation of India , Patiala . (Punjab), Patiala

(2) The Senior Regional Manager , Food Corporation of India, Punjab Region, 31 -А

Chandigarh

...Respondent APPEARANCES

For the Workman: Workman in person.

For the Managemen : Shri Parminder Singh Advocate .

AWARD

Passed on 18th ofOctober , 2008 at Patiala Camp The Central Government vide notification. Νο . L- 22012/ 168/ 2006 - R ( CM -11 ) , dated 23-4-2007 has ret med the following dispute to his Tribunal for adjudication "Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in denying engagement of Shri Pamma Singh , Contract worker under Direct Payment System at par with the other 105 contract workers already enganged under DPS is legal and justified? It rot, to what relief is the workman emathod ?

2. Case repeatedly called. Workman is not present. Representative ofthe management is present. I is anteroned by the rep . of the workman that the workman has expired . No application has been filed on behalf of the workmen for LRs . No claim statement has been filed . Therefore . Thave no option but to return the reference as such to the Central Government because the claim, it any has been abated. Central Govt .be informed. File be consigned to reus r .

G. K. SHARMA. Presiding isSicur Chandigarh. 18-10-2008

नई दिल्ली. 5 नवम्बर, 2008

का. आ. 3189.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 47 (1947 का 14 ) की भाग 17 क अनुसरण में कंन्द्रीय सरकारां खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के सबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मका अं श्रीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में कंन्द्रीय सरवार औद्यागिक अधिकरण नं.। चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ में. 43.200 को प्रकाशित करती है, जो कंन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-200६१४ कई प्राज हुआ था ।

[म. एल-22012/170 /2006 - आई आए ( सीएभ अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 5th November, 2008 S.O. 3189. In pursuance of Section 17of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Cemral Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 43 2007) of the Central Government industrial Tribunal - com- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh has shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on. 5-11-2008 .

No. 1.-22012/170 /2006- [ RICM - I AJAY KUMAR GALUR. Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1, CHANDIGARH

Case No. I. D. 43/2007

Shri Gurmail Singh , Sort of

Shri Moden Singh V & PO: Jhatoor ,

Thana, Sangrur .

...Applicam

Versus

( 1 ) The District Marvwer, lo Corporation of liktia, Patiala, (Punjab)

Respondents (2) The Senior Regional Manager , Food Corporation et India, Punjab Region, 31.A. Chandigarh

APPLAKANCES

For the Workman : Worknian in person .

For the Management Shri Parminder Singh Advocate.

AWARD

Passed on 18th of Doober 2008 at Patiala Camp .

The Central Govt. vide notification No. L- 22012-170 / 2006 IR ( CM - IT ), dated 23-4-2007 las referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in densing engagement ol Shri Gurmail Singh , Contract wurker under Direct Payment Systen it par with the other 105 coner workers aiready ganged under DPS is legal and justified ! It not, to whitt rehet is the workanan empied 2. The present reference was made by the Central Govt. on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication of the matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid .

3. The management turned up opposes this reference.

4. As per office memoranduns dated 5-9-08 . this case was fixed in pre lok adalat meeting on 18-10-2008 held in the office premises of Food Coporation of India Mahala for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism . The workman and the prescribed authority of [भाग 1 ]-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

6329

भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

the management made a joint statement that the management has agreed that as per policy ofthe department the workman will be provided with the work as andwhen available out ofthe list of the present worlanen on priority in compliance of the Hon'ble High Court New Delhi order dated 15-2-2006. The management has also agreed that while adjusting the workman it will honour the seniority list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance the workman withdraw his reference in Lok Adalat. This statement abovewas read over andexplained to workman individually inHindi andhe agreed to withdraw his case in Lok Adalat. In view of the above , the workman withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat. Accordingly the reference is returned to the Central Govt. as settled in Lok Adalat. Central Govt.be informed. File be consigned to record .

G. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer Chandigarh. 18-10-2008

नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर , 2008 का.आ. 3190, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 58/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/164/2006- आई आर (सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 5th November ,2008 S.O. 3190.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 58/ 2007) of the Central Govemment Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court No. 1, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India, and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 5-11-2008.

(No. L-22012/ 164/2006- IR( CM -11) ) AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. I. D. 58/2007

Shri Raj Singh , Son of

Shri Bachan Singh V & PO: Data,

...Applicant Singhwala, Jind.

Versus

(1) The District Manager, Food Corporation ofIndia, Patiala, (Punjab), Patiala

..Respondents (2)The Senior Regional Manager, FoodCorporation ofIndia, Punjab Region , 31 -A Chandigarh

APPEARANCES

Forthe Workman: Workman in person.

For theManagement : Shri Parminder Singh Advocate.

AWARD

Passed on 18th ofOctober 2008 at Patiala Camp.

TheCentralGovt. vide notification No. L- 22012/164/ 2006 /IR ( CM - II), dated 23-4-2007 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in denying engagement of Shri Raj Singh, Contract worker under Direct Payment System at par with the other 105 contract workers already enganged under DPS is legal and justified? Itnot, to what relief is the workman entitled "?

2. The present reference was made by the Central Govt on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication ofthe matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid.

3. The management turned up opposes this reference.

4.Asper office memorandum dated 5-9-08, this case was fixed in pre lok adalat meeting on 18-10-2008 held in the office premises of Food Coporation of India Patiala for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism. The workman and the prescribed authority of the management made a joint statement that the management has agreed that as per policy ofthe department the workman will be provided with the work as and when available out ofthe list of the present workmen on priority in compliance ofthe Hon'ble High Court , New Delhi order dated 15-2-2006. The management has also agreed that while adjusting the workman it will honour the seniority list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance the workman withdraw his reference in Lok Adalat . This statement above was read over and explained to workman individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdraw his case in Lok Adalat . In view of the above, the workman withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat . Accordingly the reference is returned to the Central Government as settled 6330

PART --S3 (1 ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA NOVI MIRIER 29, 2008/ AGRAHΑΥΛΝΑ ...

APOL RANCES

in Lok Adalat. C'eniral Government he informed i consigned to red

For theWorkman : Wederas in person

Gandigarh.

GR SHARMA. Presiding vilicer

For the Management Si Pacninder Singh . Advocate. 18-10-2008

AWARD

Camp Piniata

Passed on 18th octoi er 2008 at Patala Carmp .

दिली नवम्बर , 200

Central Govt , video No L- 22012 /133/2006-

IR ( CM - II ) , dated 23-4-20 has referred the following dis pute to this Tribunaldiculou

(1947 का 143 की के अनुसरण केन्द्रीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधकों और उनके बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्देिष्टवादद्रीय सरक अधिकरण नं.पष्ट संदर्भ नं. 1.200 को प्रकाजिन करती है , जो द्रीय कार को 51 265

"Whether the sction or the management of Food Corparation denying engagement of Shri Piara Singit worker under Direct Pay - ment Systemat p... rs the other 105 contract work- ers already eng DPS 13 legal and jusi: - fied? It not, to what relict is the workman entiled *** De St. Number 2008

2. The present eference was made by the Central Govt . on the failure of coreLation proceedings for adjud: - cation ofthe matter refereschedule referred above and the workman plating the action of the management as illegel atd.

3. The managed op opposes this refer indushid Disp . 174714 of 94

5.0. 3191. in pursuance of Socier Government is publishe - theard Ref. N of the Centralentino strid Tribuna Court No. 1. iis adadosa in Ani Industrial Dis the be Corporation of indit and then wotkanen, received Contral Gos -11-2008. "ייוריי

No L-32012:132000

EN KUMAR GARD

NURE

BEFORE SURE YANENDRA KUMAR SHARE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNWIEN ! INDUSTRIAL TERRENALEEM LABOUR COORD CHANGICARIO

Case No. 1. D. No. 1 / 2m

Shri Piant Succh. Nocof

4. As per office asmorandurn dated 5-9-08 , this case was fixed in pre lokaleeting on 18-10-2008 heid in the office premises of paration of India Patiala lor its disposal hy adopediation and conciliation mechanism. The work the prescribed authority of the management made satemen that the manage- ment has agreed that day of the departiment the workman will be provide the work as and whenavail- able out of the list ofthe workmen on priority in compliance of the Hur Court New Delhi order dated 15-2-2006 . The ansem has also agreed that whik adjusting the wornwall honour the seniority list maintained by the departament itself. On this assurance the workınan withdrawn is Lok Adalan This statemem above was reader and explained to workman individually in Hindi and hugreed to withdraw his case in [Lok Adalat. In view of the the workoman withdraw the present reference inter dias Accordingly the reter ence is returned to the Cons settled in jok Adalu , Central Govt ,be informed the besonsigned to record .

Seri Wekar Soy & PO . Patra . Patiala, :

MARAM.1. Presiding Officer

Chandigart:.

18-10-2008

Camp Patiala

नवम्बर, 2008

का.आ. 3192 , निनाद अधिनियम יגי (2 ) The Senica Benelf mager.

...Real

( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा । अन में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय साद्य निगम के प्रचंधतंत्रजकों और उनके कर्मकाः कः वीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्टनिदाद में कन्द्रीय मरकार यांगवः अधिकरण नं.। , नण्ड /200 को 6331 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[ भाग १]-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/ 192/2006- आई आर ( सीएम- [1 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 5th November, 2008

3. The management turned up and opposes this reference.

S.O. 3192.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 53/2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court No. 1, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 5-11-2008.

[No. L-22012/ 192/2006- IR( CM- II ) J AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL -CUM-LABOUR COURT- 1 ,

CHANDIGARH

Case No. 1. D. No. 53/2007

4. As per oftice memorandum dated 5-9-2008. this case was fixed in pre Lok Adalat meeting on 18-10-2008 held in the office premises of Food Corporation of India Patiala for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism . The workman and the prescribed authority of the management made a joint statement that the management has agreed that as per policy of the department the workman will be provided with the work as and when available out of the list of the present workman on priority in compliance ofthe Hon'ble High Court New Delhi order dated 15-2-2006 . The management has also agreed that white adjusting the workınan it will honour the seniority list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance the workman withdraw his reference in Lok Adalat . This statement above was read over and explained 10 workman individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdraw his case in Lok Adalat in view of the above , the workman withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat. Accordingly the reference is returned to the Central Government as settled in Lok Adalat. Central Government be intorined. Filebe consigned to record.

...Applicant

Shri Gurjant Singh , Son of Shri Chanan Singh V & PO : Jhaloor, Thana, Tehsil-Dibra, Sangrur .

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer Versus

Chandigarh.

18-10-2008

Camp Patiala

नई दिल्ली, 5 नवम्बर , 2008 (1 ) The District Manager, Food Corporation of India, Patiala, (Punjab), Patiala

का.आ. 3193.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (2) The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Punjab Region , 31 -A

...Respondents

Chandigarh

APPEARANCES

Forthe Workman : Workman in person ,

( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. । चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 74/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Shri Parminder Singh , Advocale.

Forthe Management :

AWARD

[सं. एल-22012/ 198/2006- आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 5th November, 2008 Passed on 18th ofOctober , 2008 at Patiala Camp

Central Government vide notification No. L-22012/ 192/2006- IR (CM - II ), dated 23-04-2007 , has referred the following dispute to this tribunal for adjudication:

S.O. 3193.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 74/2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 5-11-2008 .

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in denying engagement of Shri Gurjant Singh, contract worker under Direct Payment System at par with the other 105 contract workers already engaged under DPS is legal and justified ? Ifnot, to what reliefthe workman entitled

[No. L- 22012/198/ 2006- IR( CM -11 ) | AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer 6332

TIH: GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 29, 2008/AGRAHAYANA1030

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA , PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT-I, CHANDIGARH

Case No. 1. D. No. 74.2007

Shri Tersen, Sonof Shri Maghar Singh V. Raj Jharana,

PO: Shadihari , Sangrur.

PARIS0

...Applicant

Versus

( 1 ) The District Manager . Food Corporation of India , Patiala, (Punjab) .

(2) The Senior Regional Manager , Food Corporation of India, Punjab Region, 31 -Α

on priority in compliance ofthe Hon'ble High Court New Delhi order dated 15-2-2006, i he management has also agreed that while adjusting the workman it will honour the seniority list maintained by the depatment itsell. On this assurance the workman withdraw ims reference in Lok Adalat. This staternent abos e was read over and explained toworkman individually in Mardi and he agreed to withdraw his case in Lok Adalat in view of the above , the workman withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat . Accordingly the reference is returned to the Central Government as settled in Lok Adalat . Central Government be informed. File be consigned to recent

Chandigarh. 18-10-2008 Camp Patiala

G.K SHARMA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली

Resprenent

Chandigarh

APPEARANCES

For the Workman . Workman in person .

For the Managernent : Shr,Parminder Singh , Advocie.

AWARD

Passed on 18th of October , 2008 at Patiala Cann Centra! Government vide notification Nu . L -22012 ′ 198/2006 - IR ( CM- II ) , dated 23-04-2007 , has referred the following dispute to this tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether the achon of the management of Food Corporation of India in denying engagement of Shri Tarsem Singh , contract worker under Direct Payment System at par with the other 105 comract workers already engaged under DPS is legal and jusdtified ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled to ?

2. The present reference was made by the Cemral Government on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication of the matter referred in the schedule celerred above and the workınan prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid.

3. The management turned up and opposes this reference.

4. As per office mernorandum dated 5-9-2008. this case was fixed in pre L.ok Adalaat meeting on 18-10-2008 held in the office premises of Food Corporation of India Patiala for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism . The workinan and the prescribed authority of the management made a joint statement that the management has agreed that as per policy of the department the workman will be provided with the work as and when available out of the list of the present workman का.आ. 3194, भद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1937 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 1 ? कके अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संनियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्यागिक अधिकरण नं. । चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 71/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012-2001 2006 आई आर ( सीएम ॥ ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 5th November, 2008 S.O. 3194. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 114 of 1947 ) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award (Ref . No. 71 : 2007 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court No. 1. Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 5 . ] ] - 2008 .

[ N1 .-22012201 /2006 - JR ( CM - 11 )| AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

HEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAI CUM LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. 1. D. No. 71/2007

...Applicant Shri Hans Raj , Son of Shri Gurmail Singh V & PC) Badalgarh . Sangrur.

[ भाग- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6333

भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

Versus

(1 ) The District Manager, Food Corporation of India, Patiala, (Punjab).

...Respondent (2) The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Punjab Region , 31 -A Chandigarh.

APPEARANCES

For the Workman : Workman in person .

For the Management Shri Parminder Singh, Advocate.

AWARD

Passed on 18-10-2008 at Patiala Camp.

Central Govemment vide notification No. L- 22012/ 201/2006 ( IR CM - II ), dated 23-4-2007, has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India in denying engagement of Shri Hans Raj , contract worker under Direct Payment System at par with the other 105 contract workers already engaged under DPS is legal and jusdtified ? Ifnot , to what relief is the workman entitied ? "י 2. The present reference was made by the Central Government on the failure of conciliation proceedings for adjudication of the matter referred in the schedule referred above and the workman prayed for declaring the action of the management as illegal and invalid.

3. The management turned up and opposes this reference.

4.As per office memorandum dated 5-9-2008 , this case was fixed in pre Lok Adalat meeting on 18-10-2008 held in the office premises of Food Corporation of India Patíala for its disposal by adopting the mediation and conciliation mechanism . The workman and the prescribed authority of the management made a joint statement that the management has agreed that as per policy of the department the workman will be provided with the work as and when available out of the list of the present workman on priority in compliance of the Hon'ble High Court New Delhi order dated 15-2-2006. The management has also agreed that while adjusting the workman it will honour the seniority list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance the workman withdraw his reference in Lok Adalat. This statement above was read over and explained toworkman individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdraw his case in Lok Adalat in view of the above, the workman withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat . Accordingly the reference is retumed to the Central Govement as settled in Lok Adalat. Central Government be informed. File be consigned to record .

Chandigarh. 18-10-2008

CampPatiala G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 3195.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विषाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. । चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 64/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/188/2006- आई आर ( सीएम-1 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 5th November, 2008 S.O. 3195.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 64/2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Food Corporation of India , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 5-11-2008 .

[No. L-22012/ 188/2006- IR(CM -II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. I. D. No. 64/2007

...Applicant Shri Darshan Singh , Son of Shơi Budh Singh V & PO : Jhaloor Thana, The Dirba, Sangrur.

Versus

( 1 ) The District Manager, Food Cor. ofIndia, Patiala , (P )

(2) The Sen Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India , Punjab Region, 31 - A Chandigarh .

...Respondents APPEARANCES

For the Workman : Workman in person.

For the Management Shri Parminder Singh, Advocate.

6336

COACE OF INDIA NOVEMBER 29,2008/ AGRAHAYANAX

AWARD

Passed o. of Detcher et Pstiala Can Central Governeut vide notification No. 1.2.1.27 188 / 2006-18 ( C31 111, dated 23-4-2007 , inus refond the following dispuribus for adjudichun :

"Wherkesees of thebegemote r Cospel of redes in denying engagement of Shat san sangh codaci sorker made. Lu Payment Sysenal par lite after us workers heegee! DPS is led justified ? na , to what relictos ne work.nam called" "

2. K Мерк продовce was read , bs tikai Governense the failure of conciliation proccesor adjachcocoe refting sites referred in the schedalen eral above and thesed for deckering the List of the manayisland invalid

3. Tent formed us and opere is reference

diet meerug va 18

aording the meani

wordman and the p Delhi order is 06. The mange١٣

Adalatias renover word expi Patiala For conciliation achority of the st the management aged the perpos deparnnent emosided withth and whes as he list of the pres pa priority in confenes st the knigh Cou agr..ed that white drag the worsanitsell seniority list and ני assurance the wo the deparunen. Uwi . to work samadtamike agreed his case in withdrawst , prechocinek Adaka ... is the retain to die Com Go

Lettral Governmcat b settled in Loss

Fue be cons :.

Chandak

18-10-2000

1 . K. SHARMA, Presi

Caine Catia

दिनी नहर

(1947 कोथ खाद्य निगमका के बीच, अनुदय मेंगिक विवाद में कंन्द्रीय सरकारचागक अधिकरण नं, । , चण्डीगढ़ प्रकाशित करती है , जो संदर्भ सं. 39/2007 को 8-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एन- : 221006 आई आर (सीएम- !!! अजय कुमार गौड़, हेस्क अधिकारी New Delht . the November, 2008 S.O. 3196.instince of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act 17 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Governinent hereby the Award ( Ref. No. 39. 2007) of the Central Guvent ladustial Tribunal Labour Court No. 1. gai : as shown in the Annexure. in the Industrial Dispute sween the management of Ford Corporation of India, and then werkitten , received by the Central Government on 5-11-2008.

120-127-2006-11k ( CM- AJN KUMAR CAUR . Desk Otticer ANNUGRE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFENTRAL GOVERNMENM INDUSTRIALTRINH-LABOUR COURT- 1 . TANDIGARH

Case 1. 11. No. 39/201

Shri Gulzara Singh

Shri Deep Singh , V & P Satipur.

Applicam Kamalpur, Sangruz.

The District Ma

Corporation of ind (Punjah).

( 21 The Senior Regger .

[-ood Corporal

Punjab Region . 3 .

Chandigarh.

Respondeors

APKAMES

For the Workman : Warren ili per

For the Manageation. Spideruminder Singh, Vol

MARD

Passedon 18th at Patiala Camp Central Govern 127 /2006- IR ( CM - 11 ) following dispute to Us irans for adjudication: de sfication Ne 23-4-2007 , has referred the "Whether the act the management of Food Corporation of dia in denying engagement st Shri Gulzarna Siwaker onder Direct Payner Systemat par witht ! esher lus contract workersaln ads engaged under Dslegal and justified ? 11 not to what relief is the workremate ?" 6335

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8, 1930

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (i)]

Tribunal -cum - Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BBMB and their workman , which was received by the Central Governmenton 5-11-2008.

[No. L-42012/ 1 / 1993 - IR (DU )/ ( C - 11 ) ] 3. The management turned up and opposes this reference.

[No. L-42012/5/ 1993 - IR ( DU ) ( C -11) }

[No. L-42012/3/ 1993 - IR ( DU )/( C - II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR, SHARMA PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM -LABOUR COURT- 1. CHANDIGARH

Case I.D. Nas. 95/94, 97/94, 99/94

(1) Shri Dayanand S/o Shri Guljari Rio Luhari Jattu, Tehsil Bhawanikhera, Distt .-Bhiwani

(2) Shri Jai Bhagwan Rio Mandana, Tehsil Bhawanikhera, Distt . Bhiwani .

(3) Shri Suresh S/o Shri Muni Lal , H.No. 105 , Labour Colony, Bhiwani , Distt . Bhiwani .

Applicants

Versus

4.As per office memorandum dated 5-9-2008 , this casewas fixed in pre Lok Adalat meeting on 18-10-2008 held in the office premises of Food Corporation of India Patiala for its disposal by adoptingthe mediation and conciliation mechanism . The workman and the prescribed authority ofthe management made a joint statement that the management has agreed that as per policy of the department the workman will be provided with the work as and when available out of the list of the present workmen on priority in compliance ofthe Hon'ble High Court , New Delhi order dated 15-2-2006 . The management has also agreed that while adjusting the workman it will honour the seniority list maintained by the department itself. On this assurance the workman withdraw his reference in Lok Adalat. This statement above was read over and explained to workman individually in Hindi and he agreed to withdraw his case in Lok Adalat . In view of the above , the workman withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat. Accordingly the reference is returned 10 the Central Government as settled in Lok Adalat . Central Government be informed. Fife be consigned to record.

Chandigarh.

The Executive Engineer , Stores and Arrears Division B.B.M.B. , Bhiwani , Haryana . Respundent

APPEARANCES G. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

18-10-2008 Camp Patiala

For the workman :

Sri. Hardayal Singh नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर, 2008

Sri. Jyoti Kaushal

For the management:

AWARD

Passed on 14-10-2008 का.आ. 3197.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.बी.एम.बी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक चिवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. - 1, चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 95/1994, 97/1994, 99/1994 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो कंन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2008 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -42012/1 / 1993- आई आर ( डो. यू. )/( सो- [1 ]

[सं. एल-42012/3 / 1993- आई आर ( डो. यू.) /(सी-11 ]

[ सं. एल-42012/5/1993 आई आर (डो. यू. ) (सी- II ]

अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 5th November, 2008

These three references namely L.D. No. 95/94 , Ref. No. L-42012/ 1 /93 - IR ( DU )/ ( C - II ) , dated 24-8-94 . Shri Dayanand Vs. Bias Project , I.D. No. 97/94. Ref. No. L-42012 3.'93 - IR(DU )/ ( C- II ) , dated 24-8-94, Shri Jai Bhagwan Vs. Bias Project and I.D. No. 99/94 , Ref. No. L -42012/5 / 93-1R ( DUY (C- II), dated -24-8-94, Shri Suresh Vs. Bias Project are similar in nature. Common question of facts and law are involved in all these references and the question to be adjudicated is also the same whether the termination of each of the workman by the Bias Project . Bhiwani w.e.f. 28-2-90 are just, fair and legal ? and whether each workmen are entitled for any relief? Accordingly, all the references are answered by singleAward.

LD. No. 95/94will be leading file and a copy of the awardwill be placed in the files of I.D. No , 97/94 and 1.D. No.99/94.

S.O. 3197. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 95/ 1994,97/1994,99/1994) of the Central Government Industrial 6336

паттE OF INDIA. NOVEMBER 29 , 2008/AGRAHAYANAS BE

have gone thing the pleadings of parties which are in form of scitement of claim filed by the workınan and written statement filed by on behalf of the management of respendent. It is claimed by the workman that they were appointe- longiiferent dates in the year 1987 an the post-of Malis daily caged workers. They have completed 2-10 days it work preceding to the date of their termination from services without any notice or retronenment compensation . Accordingly their termination was had in Law and illegal . As the juniorsto them were retained it service and few new hands were recruited by the Rias Project , they are entitled for reinstalement into the servires.

The management of respondent Bias Project denied the facts raised by the workman and alleged that on completion of the Project services of all the daily waged workers were terminated as per the provisions of industrial Disputes Act. Notice was given to them which they refuse to receive and all the three workmen alos refused to receive the retrenchmetit compensation . The Bias Project is that in existence. There is no work BCB nor any worker/employee physically in position under BCB . Only some notional posts are continued in BCB which are being managed by the Officers of BBMH in dual capacity . It has also been alleged by the management of respondent that none of the workmen has completed 240 days of work preceding to the late of their termination , hence , they were not entitled for any retrenchment compensation . Instead of that , they were afforded the opportunity for getting one month advance salary and the retrenchment compensation as desired by Industrial Disputes Act, which they refused . Both of the parties adduced the swal evidence and filed the documentary evidence as well .

I have heard learned counsels for the parties and pursued all the materials on record.

Learned contist ! for the workmen has argued that as per evidence of management it was the part completion of the Project on which the services of the workmen were terminated which is against the provisions of industrial Disputes Act li has also been alleged by learned counsel for the workmen that few new hands were recruited alter the Icamination of the services of the workmen which entitles the workmen for their reinstatement into the services 1.earned counsel for the management of Bhas Project has argued that as the work of the Project was over, no work was left for the work men their set vices were ordered tobe terminated under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, and no new recruitment were made after the termination oftheir services .

In the statement ofclaim, all the workmen have alieged that no notice was given nor retrenchment compensation paiki , but in the cross - examination every workmen has admitted that the notice was served upon them but they refused to accept the same . It shows that intention of the management was conveyed to them that their services were

[PARIS 300 regarding the retrench of enty wager is red which also shows an of the marcтет по retrenched the daily ared workers including the three no more required . The tik dated 27-2-9it is na recond which shows that series of sy workmen were זיותית required w.c.f. 28-2-90 . Vide ibis notice the management also asked every work.men to wceive one month salans in lieu of notice and retomach sont compensation from the SDO C/ W S /D IL BB, B. Services of this notice is admitted by all the work aes. Order no . 293 med 8-3-90 workmen whose claim is tis Question in these references . As on completion of the work . The management shows its intention to give one moreth salary in lieu of one toith notice and retrenchment compensation in compliance f the provisions of Insustrial Disputes Act , the termination of the workmen cannot fresaid to be illegal under the provisions of Industrial risques Act .

Another issue le de answered by this Tribunal is whether the management has violated the policy of last come first go and appoint any new hamis atter the termination of the services of the wurkmen ? The workmen have to prove before this Fribunal that new hands were recruited after the tennitation of their services . There is a causal statement made by all the workmen in their cross- examination that Ram Parstad had beer appointed after their termination . Witnesse of the management in his cross-examination have denied this contention . It was a casual statement made by each workmen without narrating and disclosing the post and place of posting on which the worker so recruited was working and recording the addresses . The documents which have been filed by the management proved that there was no violation of the rufe of last come first go anual no new hands were recruited . As per the documents filed by the management . it is evident that all the workmen working in a particulan wing were retrenched as per the provisoris of Industrial Disputes Act as their services were no more reqttired . Accordingly, all these references are answered in positive that the action of the management of Bias Project Bhiwani in tennisetting the services of all the three workmen were just . fair sand legal?

So far as the next pout of the reference is concerned which is 10what relief' are the workmen entitled , I am of the view that asthe workmen have yet not received one month salary in lieu ofthe notice and retrens larunt compensation , they are entitled to receive the same with 99. interest from 28-2-90 till the date of payment. The non - payment of one month salary in iteu of notice and retrerelment compensation was on ground of the conduct of the workmen , so , no other relier compensation can be awarded to any of the workman . Accordingly , the management of respondent is directed to provide to the workmen of deposited the same in the Tribunal one month salary in lieu ofthe notice which was due at the time of the termination of the services of the workmen and retrenchment [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii ) )

6337 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

01.106- लौह अयस्क खान, मैग्नीज अयस्क खान और क्रीय अयस्क

श्रम कल्याण निधि 01.106.04-स्वास्थ्य

लेखा का शीर्ष इकाई

(हजार रुपए में) compensation along with 9 % interest thereon form 28-2-90 till the date of payment within one inonth from the publication of the award. Central Governmentbe informed . File be consigned.

वेतन

04.00.01

29212 GK. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

04.00.02

215 नई दिल्ली, 11 नवम्बर , 2008

मजदूरी

04.00.03

अतिकाल भत्ता

04.00.06

259

चिकित्सीय उपचार

04.00.11

375

घरेलू यात्रा त्र्यश्य

04.00.13

2706

कार्यालय व्यय

04.00.14 किराया दर और कर

608 का.आ. 31.08.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , लौह अयस्क खान, मैग्नीज अयस्कखान और क्रोम अयस्क खान श्रम कल्याण निधि अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 61 ) की धारा 10 के अनुसरण में, वर्ष 2007-2008 के लिए उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन लेखाओं का विवरण और वित्त पोषित क्रियाकलापों की रिपोर्ट अनुसूची । और अनुसूची-2 के अनुसार क्रमशः निम्न प्रकार से प्रकाशित करती है :

04.00.16

प्रकाशन

04.00.21

4100

सामग्री और प्रदाय

वर्ष 2007-2008 के लिए लौह अयस्क खान , मैग्नीज्ज अयस्कखान और क्रोम अयस्क खान श्रम कल्याण निधि के लेखाओं का विवरण

04.00.31

7357

सहायता अनुदान

04.00.50

अनुसूची-1

अन्य प्रभार

1405 आय

योग

46273 01-04-2007 को आरंभिक बकाया

रु. 139.05 करोड़ 03.106- लौह अयस्क खान , मैग्नीज्त अयस्क खान और क्रोम अयस्क

श्रम कल्याण निधि 01.106.06 -शिक्षा

वर्ष 2007-2008 के दौरान अंतरित उपकर रु. 21.52 करोड़

लेखा का शीर्ष इकाई

( हजार रुपए में) कुल आय

रु. 160.57 करोड़

06.00.01

वेतन

4406 व्यय

06.00.06

चिकित्सीय उपचार

मुख्यशीर्ष-2230

06.00-11

घरेलूयात्रा व्यय

06.00.13 कार्यालय व्यय

85 01-106-लौह अयस्कखान , मैग्नीस अयस्क खान और क्रोम अयस्क खान श्रम कल्याण निधि 01.106.03- प्रशासन

06.00.14

किराया , दर और कर

लेखा का शौर्ष इकाई

(हजार रुपए में )

06.00.21

119

सामग्री और प्रदाय

वेतन

03.01.01

9050

06.00.34

15706

छात्रवृत्ति और वृत्तिका

03.01.02

109

मजदूरी

06.00.50

1701

अन्य प्रभार

03.01.03

अतिकाल मत्ता

योग

22168 03.01.06

289

चिकित्सीय उपचार

01.106- लौह अयस्क खान , मैग्नीज अयस्क खान और क्रोम अयस्क 03.01.11

459 श्रम कल्याण मिধि 01.106.07 -मनोरंजन घरेलूयात्रा व्यय

03.01.13 कार्यालय व्यय

1980 लेखा का शीर्ष इकाई

( हजार रुपए में) 03.01.14

497

किराया दरें और कर

वेतन

07.00.01

919 03.01.16

प्रकाशन

12 07.00.06

चिकित्सीय उपचार

07.00.11

20 03.01.21

घरेलू मात्रा व्यब

सामग्री और प्रदाय

07.00.13

कार्यालय व्यथ

03.01.26

विज्ञापन और प्रचार

07.00.14

किराया , दर और कर

03.01.27

लघु कार्य

07.00.21 सामग्री और प्रदाय

03.01.28

वृत्तिक सेवाएं

07.00.31

सहायता अनुदान

03.01.50

अन्य प्रभार

07.00.50

अन्य प्रभार

221

1384

योग

12648 [PART 11 --SFC 3 ( 0 ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 29 , 2008 /AGRAHAYANA 8 , 1930

6338

इकाई

क्रम सं. क्रियाकलाप का नाम

01.106- लौह अयस्क खान , मैग्नीज अयस्कखान और क्रोम अयस्क खान श्रम कल्याण निधि 01.106.05- आवास

5. हृदय रोग का उपचार

लेखा का शीर्ष इकाई (हजार रुपए में)

6. गुर्दा रोग का उपचार

516

वेतन

04.01.01

चिकित्सीय उपचार

04.01.06

7. खान कर्मकारों की नसबंदी के लिए धन ] संबंधी प्रतिकर का संदाय

04.01.42 एकमुश्त उपबंध 65

04.02.31 निम्न लागत गृह निर्माण स्कीम

8. विधवा विधुर की पुत्री के विवाह में व्यय के लिए वित्तीय सहायता 3 04.03.31

9. अंत्येष्टि के लिए विनीय सहायता 1 अपना स्व गृह निर्माण करो स्कीम सहायता अनुदान

ख. आवास

कुल आवास 2348 योग (2230) 84821

10. अपना स्वगृह निमार्ण कगे स्कीम , सामूहिक गृह निर्माण स्कीम, टाईप 1 और 2 गृह निर्माण स्कीम के अधीन स्वीकृत गृहों की संख्या लौह अयस्क खान , मैग्नीज अयस्क खान और क्रोम अयस्क खान श्रम कल्याण निधि स्वास्थ्य

ग. शिक्षा

11. लौह अयस्क खान, मैग्नीज अयस्क स्त्रान और 13851 भोटर यान मशीनरी और उपस्कर 172 12

184

कुल स्वास्थ्य( 4250 )

क्रोम अयस्क खान कर्मकारों के स्कूल जाने वाले बालकों को छात्रवृत्ति और अन्य वित्तीय सहायता प्रदान करना

लौह अयस्क खान , मैग्नीज़ अयस्क खान और क्रोम अयस्क खात्र अम कल्याण निधि मनोरजन

12. वहाँ पाठ्यपुस्दकों का प्रदाय

मोटर यान

घ. मनोरंजन

4고

योग मनोरंजन (4250 )

13. टोबी सेंट

225

योग (4250 )

יב

85047

कुल योग

रु. 160.57 करोड़

कुल आय

कुल व्यय रु. 8.50 करोड़

14. लौह अयस्क खान, संग्नीज अयस्क खान और क्रोम अयस्क खान कर्मकारों के लिए क्रिड़ाओं , खेलकूद , सामाजिक और सांस्कृतिक क्रियाकलापोंका आयोजन

अनुसूची-2

15 . खेलकूद के सामान की खरीद 2

16 . कर्मकार यात्रा विश्रामगृह

जल प्रदाय

17. बड़ी खानों को सहायता

इकाई

[फा. स. एस-23025/ 1 /08 -डब्ल्यू [ [. ] i वर्ष 2007-2008 के दौरान लौह अयस्क खान , मैग्नीज्ज अयम्त खान और क्रोम अयस्क खान कल्याण निधि के अधीन बिनपषित क्रियाकलाप क्रन सं. क्रियाकलाप का नाम क. स्वास्थ्थ:

अनिल स्वरूप , महानिदेशक ( श्रम कल्याण ) संयुक्त सचिन 1. स्थिर- सह- गतिशीत्न/स्थिर एलोपैथिक और स्थिर आयुर्वेदिक औषधालय 16

New Delhi , the i 1th November , 2008 2. लौह अयस्क खान , मौनोज अयस्क खान और 113 क्रोम अयस्क खान कर्मकारों के लिए अस्पताल

3. औषधालय/ अस्पतालों में उपचार किए गए रोगियों की संख्या 255403

S.O. 3198.-In pursuance of Section 10 ofthe Ito ) Ore Mines, Manganese Ore Mines and Chrome Ore Mines Labour Welfare Fund Act , 1976 (61 of 1976) , the Central Government hereby publishes the statement of accounts and the report ofthe activities financed under the saidAct. the year 2007-2008 as per Schedule-t and Schedule-1 . respectively, as under:

4. कैंसर से पीड़ित लौह अयस्क खान, मैग्नीज अयस्कखान और क्रोम अयस्क खान कर्मकारों का उपचार [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS OF IRON ORE MINES, MANGANESE ORE MINES AND CHROME ORE MINES LABOUR WELFARE FUND FOR THE YEAR 2007-2008

SCHEDULE-

INCOME

6339

भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 29, 2008/ अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

3 1

375 04.00.11 Domestic Travel Expenses

2706 04.00.13 OfficeExpenses

608 04.00.14 Rents, Rates and Taxes

30 Publication

04.00.16

4100

Rs 139.05 crores

OpeningBalance as on 1-4-2007

04.0021 Material and Supply

Rs . 21.52 crores

Cess transferred during the year

2007-2008

7357 Grants- in-aid

04.00.31

1405 04.00.50 OtherCharges

Rs. 160.57 crores

Total Income

EXPENDITURE MajorHead2230

01.106 Iron Ore Mines , Manganese Ore Mines and Chrome Ore Mines Labour Welfare Fund 01.106.03-Administration

Units

Headof Account

46273 Total

01.106-Iron Ore Mines , Manganese Ore Mines and Chrome Ore Mines Labour Welfare Fund 01.106.06-Education

Units

Headof Accounts

(Rs. in thousand)

(Rs. in

thousand)

3 2

9050 03.01.01 Salaries

109 03.01.02 Wages

24 Overtine Allowance

03.01.03

289 03.01.06 Medical Treatment

459 03.01.11 Domestic Travel Expenses

1980 03.01.13 OfficeExpenses

497 03.01.14 Rents, Rates and Taxes

12 Publication

03.01.16

94 03.01.21 Supply and Material

21 03.01.26 Advertisement and Publicity

67 03.01.27 Minor Work

40 03.01.28 Professional Services

6 03.01.50 Other Charges

12648 Total

01.106-Iron Ore Mines , Manganese Ore Mines and Chrome Ore Mines Labour Welfare Fund

01.106.04-- Health

(Rs. in Units

Head of Accounts

440 06-00-01 Salaries

53 06-00-06 Medical Treatment

77 06-00-11 Domestic Travel Expenses

85 06-00-13 OfficeExpenses

21 Rents , Rates and Taxes

06-00-14

119 06-00-21 Material and Supply

15706 06-00-34 Scholarships and Stipend

1701 06-00-50 Other Charges

22168 Total

01,106-Iron Ore Mines , Manganese Ore Mines and ChromeOre Mines Labour Welfare Fund 01.106.03-Recreation

Units

(Rs. in thousand) Headof Accounts

919 Salaries

07-00-01

45 Medical Treatment

07-00-06

30 Domestic Travel Expenses

07-00-11

5 07-00-13 OfficeExpenses

53 07-00-14 Rents , Rates and Taxes

thousand)

29212 04.00.01 Salaries

215 04.00.02 Wages

6 04.00.03 Overtime Allowance

259 04.00.06 Medical Treatmetit

46 07-00-21 Material and Supply

75 Grants- ir-aid

07-00-31

221 07-00-50 Other Charges

1384 Total 6340

[PART II---SFC. 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 29 , 2008 /AGRAHAYANA 8 , 1930

01.106 Iron Ore Mines , Manganese Ore Mines and ChromeOre Mines Labour Welfare Fund 01.106.05 Housing

Unit-

Head of Accounts

6 4. Treatment of Iron Ore Mines, Manganese OreMines and Chrome Ore Mines Workers suffering from Cancer.

10 5. Treatment for Heart Disease

(Rs. in

thousand)

07-01-01 Salaries

516 07-01-06

19 Medical Treatment

07-01-42

65 Lumpsum Provision

07-02-31

1080 Low Cost Housing Scheme

07-403-31 BYONS Grants - in -aid

668

2348 Total Housing

84821 Total(22,30)

Major Head 1250

Iron Ore Mines . Manganese Ore Mines and Chrome Ore Mines Labour Welfare Fund

Health

Motor Vehicle

172

12 Machinery and Equipments

184 Total Health (4250 )

IronOre Mines. Manganese Ore Mines and Chrome Ore Mines Labour Welfare Fund

Recreation

42 Motor Vehicle

Total Recreation (4250 )

726 Total (1250 )

GrandTotal

8507 Total Income

Rs. 160.57 LOVES

Rs . 8.50 crores Total Expenditure

SCHEDULE- T

Activities Financed under the Iron Ore Mines .

ManganeseOre Mines and Chrome Ore Mines Labour Welfare Fondduring the Year 2007-08

Units S. No. Name of the activity

3 A.HEALTH :

16 1. Stabc- cunt- Mobune Statue Allopathic and Static Ayurvedic Dispensaries .

03 2. Hospitals for the fron Ore Mines, Manganes . Ore Mines and Chrome Ore Mines workerずら、

255903 3. Numplier of patients treated in dispensaries/hospitals.

6. Treatment for Kidney Disease

7. Payment of Monetary Compensation for sterilization to Mines workers .

& Financial assistance for wedding expenses to widow's/widower's daughter .

9. Financial assistance for funeral expenses B. HOUSING:

9 10. Number of houses sanctioned under Build YourOwn House Scheme, Group Housing Scheme, Type- ! and II Housing Scheme.

C. EDUCATKON :

13851 11. Award of scholarship and other financial assistance to the school going children of Iron Ore Mines , Manganese Ore Mines and Chrome Ore Mines Workers

12. Supply of uniform text books

6957 D. RECREATION :

13. Television Set

1 14. Organising sports , games , social and cultural activities for Iron Ore Mines. Manganese Ore Mines and Chrome Ore Mines Workers .

2 15. Purchase of sports material

1252 16. Workers visiting holiday homes

E. WATER SUPPLY

17. Assistance to big mines

[F.No. S -23025/ 1/08 -W.11 ] ANIL SWARUP , Director General ( Labour Welfare JI. Seey.

नई दिल्ली , ।। नत्रम्बर, 2008

का.आ. 3199,- केन्द्रीय सरकार , चौड़ी कर्मकार कल्याण निधि अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1971 का 62 ) की धारा 10 के अनुसरण में, वर्ष 2007-2008 के लिए उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन लेखाओं का विवरण और वित्तपोषित क्रियाकलापों की रिपोर्ट, अनुसूची । और अनुसूची-2 के अनुसार क्रमशः निम्न प्रकार से प्रकाशित करती है :

6341 भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) )

वर्ष 2007-2008 के लिए बीड़ी कर्मकार कल्याण

निधि के लेखाओं का विवरण

प्रकाशन

04-00-16

अनुसूची-1

57563

04-00-21 सामग्री और प्रदाय

आय

154

04-00-26 विज्ञापन और प्रकाशन

01-04-2007 को आरंभिक बकाया

रु. 24.24 करोड़

1995

04-00-27 लघुकार्य

34114

अन्य प्रभार

04-00-50

वर्ष 2007-2008 के दौरान अंतरित उपकर रु. 184.62 करोड़

346989

योग

रु. 208.86 करोड़

कुल आय

व्यव

01.109 बीड़ी कर्मकार कल्याण निधि

मुख्य शीर्ष-2230

01.109.03- शिक्षा

01.109 बीड़ी कर्मकार कल्याण निधि

(हजार रुपए में)

लेखा का शीर्ष इकाई

01.109.04 प्रशासन

413

03-00-26 विज्ञापन और प्रकाशन

(हजार रुपए में )

लेखा का शीर्ष इकाई

789996

03-00-34 छात्रवृत्ति और वृत्तिका

वेतन

26931

05-00-01

अन्य प्रभार

43482

03-00-50

220

05-00-02 मजदूरी

133891

योग

05-00-03 अतिकाल भत्ता

01.109 बोड़ी कर्मकार कल्याण निधि

05-00-06 चिकित्सीय उपचार

972

01.109.05 - शिक्षा

1932

05-00-11 घरेलू यात्रा व्यय

( हजार रुपए में )

लेखा का शीर्ष इकाई

05-00-13

7053

कार्यालय व्यय

502

चेतन

02-00-01

1409

05-00-14 किराया, दरें और कर

अतिकाल भत्ता

02-00-03

प्रकाशन

118

05-00-16

02-00-06 चिकित्सीय उपचार

05-00-27 लघुकार्य

02-00-11 घरेलू यात्रा व्यय

05-00-28 वृत्तिक सेवाएं

कार्यालय व्यय

02-00-13

05-00-50 अन्य प्रभार

02-00-21 सामग्री और आपूर्ति

38897

योग

154

02-00-26 विज्ञापन और प्रकाशन

01,109 बीड़ी कर्मकार कल्याण निधि

02-00-27 लघु कार्य

01.109.04 स्वास्थ्य

605

02-00-50 अन्य प्रभार

(हजार रुपए में)

लेखा की शीर्ष इकाई

1282

योग

01.109 बीड़ी कर्मकार कल्याण निधि

वेतन

228186

04-00-01

01.109.01 आयास

1905

मजदूरी

लेखा का शीर्ष इकाई

(हजार रुपए में) 04-00-02

04-00-03 अतिकाल भत्ता

1607

चिकित्सीय उपचार

वंतन

112

01-03-01

04-00-06

3403

घरेलू यात्रा व्यय

93038

01-01-31 अपना स्वगृह निर्माण करो स्कीम 04-00-11

10121

कार्यालय व्यय

04-00-13

सहायता अनुदान

16000

7880 01-02-33

04-00-14 किराया , दरें और कर

सामूहिक गृह निर्माण सहायकी 6342

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29 , 2008 :AGRAM LAYA

Siter 1

06-00-33 ग्रहायको

!! . बोड़ी कर्मनाश्रमवधी प्रतिकार का नं :

कुल सवाल 22.30

2105832

12. हृदय रोगों के बाद कलाका उपचार

भू७ शर्षि (2230 ) के अधीन कुल व्यव

13. गुर्दा प्रत्यारोपणका कर्मकारों कर मुख्यशीर्ष 01.00.31- सहायता अनुदान

14. अत्येष्टि के लिए 1342 मुख्य शीर्ष 360 ! ) के अशीत कुल न्यय

15. लघु बीयारिक 5 मुख्य शीर्ष 4250 बोडी कर्मकार कल्याण निधि स्वास्थ्य

16. स्त्री रोग का उपजा

मोटर छान

3380

17.

मशीनरी और जमकर

1243

योग (4250)

18. विधवा दिधुराका का : " विवाह त्र्यय

कुल यांग

ख. समाजिदः ال

2088 号

कुल आय

19. समूह बीमा यो

कुल व्यव

ग. आबास

अनुसूची-2

20. एकीकृत गृदा स्लोकांत गृहों को संख्नः

वर्ष 2007-2008 के दौरान बीड़ी कर्मकार कल्याण विधि के अधीन वित्तयांवित क्रियाकलाप

घ. शिक्षा

क्रम सं.

क्रियाकलाप का नाम

21. बीडी कर्मकालक 2

क. स्वासाः ;

22. गीड़ो कर्मकार बालकवरे पुस्तको गणनाः

ङ मनोरंजन

1. स्थिर सहचाल. स्थिर एलोपेथिक और स्थिर आयुर्वेदिक औवधालय

リ

2. बोडी कर्मकार के लिए अस्पताल

कर्मकारों केकशन 23. श्रव्य दृश्य रोम से बीडी 3. दिर्माणाधीन अन्पताल ( पूरा होने के निकट)

4. औषधाजदः अम्पताल में उपचारित मरीज

24. बीड़ी कर्नकामन सामाजिक और क्रियाकलाप आयोजित

5. दीनी अम्पत्वल में अभिभोग औसत सैय्या

25. विश्राम गृह में

० तपेदिक में पडित बीड़ो कर्मकारों का आवासीय उपचार

1725 "बीड़ी कर्मकारों के सभी इसके अंतर्गत आत हैं। ? जैसर में दम बोड़ी कर्मकारों का उपन्या

וי

४. मानसिंगों में तब्येड़ी कर्मकारों का आवायोग उपचार

अनिल स्वरूपल्या संयुक्त सचिव New Delhi.hein Sveinber, 2008 ५. मेने के लिए बीड़ी कर्मकारों का वित्तीय साधना

10. मांडला गडी कारों के लिए प्रसूति प्रसुविधा

5.O. 3199.-- of Section 10 ofthe Reedi Workers Welled Act 14762 of 10 bili Central Government nestes the sMvement oi accounts and the repe the activities financed ander 6343

भारत का राजपत्र: नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

the said Act , the year 2007-2008 as per Schedule- 1 and Schedule- 11, respectively, as under :-

STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS OF BEEDI WORKERS WELFARE FUND FOR THE YEAR

2007-2008

SCHEDULE

INCOME

Rs24.24 crores Opening Balance as on 1-4-2007

Rs. 184.62 crores Cess transferred during the year

2007-2008

Rs . 208,86 crores Total Income

EXPENDITURE

MajorHead2230

01.109 Beedi Workers Welfare Fund 1,109.05--Administration

Units

Headof Accounts

(Rs. in thousand)

26931 05-00-01 Salaries

220 05-00-02 Wages

69 OvertimeAllowance

05-00-03

972 Medical Treatment

05-00-06

1932 Domestic Travel Expenses

05-00-11

7053 05-00-13 OfficeExpenses

1409 Rents, Rates and Taxes

05-00-14

118 Publication

05-00-16

27 MinorWork

05-00-27

Professional Services

05-00-28

75 Other Charges

05-00-50

38897 Total

01.109-Beedi Workers Welfare Fund

1.109.04 Health

Units

(Rs . in thousand) Headof Account

3 2

228186 Salaries

04-00-01

1905 Wages

04-00-02

13 Overtime Allowance

04-00-03

1607 Medical Treatment

04-00-06

3403 Domestic Travel Expenses

04-00-11

10121 04-00-13 OfficeExpenses

7880 Rents , Rates and Taxes

04-00-14

3 2

Publication

04-00-16

龙

57563 04-00-21 Material and Supply

154 04-00-26 Advertisement and Publicity

1995 04-00-27 MinorWork

34114 Other Charges

04-00-50

346989 Total

01.109-Beedi Workers Welfare Fund 1.109.03-Education

Units

(Rs. in thousand) Head of Account

413 Advertisement and Publicity

03-00-26

789996 Scholarship and Stipend

03-00-34

43482 03-00-50 OtherCharges

833891 Total

01.109 Beedi Workers Welfare Fund 1.109.02-Recreation

Units

(Rs. in thousand) Headof Account

502 02-00-01 Salaries

10 02-00-03 Overtime Allowance

21 Medical Treatment

02-00-06

40 02-00-11 DomesticTravel Expenses

34 02-00-13 OfficeExpenses

10 02-00-21 Material and Supply

60 MinorWork

02-00-27

605 Other Charges

02-00-50

1282 Total

01.109-Beedi Workers Welfare Fund

1.109.01-Housing

Units

(Rs. in thousand) Head of Account

3 2

112 Salaries

01-03-01

93038 BYOHS-Grants-in-aid

01-01-31

16000 01-02-33 GHS-Subsidies

775623 Subsidies

06-00-33

1071573 Total Housing 2230

2105832 Total expenditure underMajor Head(2230) 6344

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29 , 2008 AGRAHAYANA 8 , 1930

Major Ifead-3601 , EWS- 01.00.31 - Grants - in -aid 186800 Total expenditure under Major 18680 Head (3601)

Major Head-4250

Beedi Workers Welfure Fund

Health

Motor Vehicle

8380

1293 Machinery and Equipments

9673 Total (1250 )

GrandTotal

2302305 Total Incine

Rs .208.86 crores

Rs. 230.23 crores Total Expenditure

SCHEDULE

Activities Financed Under the Beedi Workers Welfare FundDuring the Year 2007-08

Sl . No. Name of the activity

A. HEALTH :

1. Static- cum-Mobile Static Allopathic and 301 Static Ayurvedic Dispensaries .

2. Hospitals for Beedi Workers

3. Hospitals under construction ( nearly completion)

[PART ISC. 3( 1 ) ]

3 15. Treatment of Minor Diseases 75 16. Treatment ofGyanecological diseases 18 17. Treatment ofAppendectomy 5

412 18. Wedding Expendititre of daughter of Widow/Widower becdi workers

B. SOCIAL SECURITY :

1051361 19. Group Insurance Scheme *

C.HOUSING:

20. Number of houses sanctioned under 39133 Integrated Housing Schome.

D. EDUCATION :

21. Award of Scholarship to the school going children of Beedi Workers 628658

216561 22. Supply of Books Uniforms to the school going children of Beedi Workers

E.RECREATION :

23. Exhibition of films for Beedi Workers 6 through Audio - Visual Sets/ Cinema Vans 24. Organizing sports , games , social and cultural activities for Beedi Workers 5

1725 25. Workers visited holiday homes

*All Identity Card holders of Beedi workers are covered.

[F.No. S -24025/27/08-W.II !

ANIL SWARUP, Director General (Labour Welfare ) Jt Secy, नई दिल्ली , 12 नवम्बर, 2008

7772986

4. Patients treated in dispensarius hospitals.

12884 5. Average Bed Occupation in TB Hospitals.

6. Domiciliary Treatment of Boedi Workers suffering from Tuberculosis

7. Treatment of Beeri Workers suffering from Cancer

21 8. Treatment of Beedi Workers suffering from Mental Diseases

5083 9. Financial Assistance to Beedi Workers for purchase of Spectacles

9480 10. Maternity Benelit Scheme for Female Beedi Workers

113 11. Payment of Monetary Compensation for Sterilization

178 12. Treatment of Beeds Workers in respect of Heart Diseases

31 13. Treatment of Beedi Workers in respect of Kidney Transplantation

14. Financial assistance for funeral

1342 का,आ. 3200.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा-1 की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्‌द्वारा । दिसम्बर , 2008 , को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करतो है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय-5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77, 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध उत्तर प्रदेश के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत होंगे , अर्थात्:

राजस्व ग्राम

जिला

राजस्थ परगना

राजस्व तहसील

झांसी

1. लहरगिर्द

झांसो

झांसी

2. भगवन्त पुरा

झांसी

झांसी 3. कोल्छा भावर

झांसी

4. करारो

झांसी

झांसो

5. पिछोर

झांसी 6. करगवां

झांसी

[सं. एस. 38013/43/2008 - एस.एस. 11

एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव 6345

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 29, 2008/अग्रहायण 8 , 1930

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 12th November , 2008 S.O. 3200.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (3 ) of Section I of the Employee ' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints the Ist December , 2008 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter V and VI [ except sub - section (i ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Uttar Pradesh namely:-

District

Tehsil

Revenue Pargana

Revenue Village

Jhansi Jhansi Jhansi 1. LeharGird

Jhansi

2. Bhagwantpura Jhansi

Jhansi Jhansi 3. Kochha Bhawar Jhansi

Jhansi

4. Karai

Jhansi

Jhansi Jhansi

5. Pichhor

Jhansi

Jhansi Jhansi

6. Kargawan

[No. S-38013/43/2008 -SS.I ] S. D. XAVIER , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 19 नवम्बर, 2008

का.आ. 3201.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा की उप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतदद्वारा । दिसम्बर , 2008 , को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है, जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय-4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत की जा चुकी है ] के उपबन्ध उड़ीसा राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत होंगे , अर्थात्:-

" अधिनियम के उक्त प्रावधान जिन क्षेत्रों में पहले ही लागू किए जा चुके हैं उनको छोड़कर गंजाम जिले में बरहमपुर की म्युनिसिपल सीमाओं के क्षेत्र इसमें शामिल हैं, तथा

1. गंजाम जिले में बरहमपुर तहसील के अंतर्गत रत्नपुर, शंकरपुर, मर्दराजपुर सुंदरराजपुर , अंकुशपुर , सानकुशस्थली के राजस्व 2. गंजाम जिले में छत्रपुर तहसील के अंतर्गत रघुनाथपुर , नरेन्द्रपुर के राजस्व गांव

3. गंजाम जिले में कोणिषी तहसील के अंतर्गत हलदी आपदर , रलभा, कोणिषी , हिन्जलापल्ली के राजस्व गांव शामिल हैं । "

[सं. एस. 38013/44/2008- एस.एस. 1 ]

एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 19th November, 2008 S.O. 3201. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948 ), the Central Government hereby appoints the Ist December, 2008 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force) and Chapter V andVI (except sub- section (i) ofSection 76 and Sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force ] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State ofOrissa namely:-

"The areas comprising of the Municipal limits of Behrampur in the district of Ganjam except the areas in which the said provisions of the Act have already been brought into force " and

1. The revenue villages of Ratanpur, Sankarpur, Mardarajpur, Sundararajpur , Ankushpur, Sanakusastali under the Tehsil Behrampur in the District ofGanjam .

2 The revenue villages of Raghunathpur, Narendrapur under Tehsil Chatrapur in the District ofGanjam, and 3. The revenue villages ofHaladiapodar, Ralava, Konisi , Hinjalapalli under Tehsil of Konisi in the District of Ganjam.

[No. S-38013/44/2008 -SS.I ] S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 19 नवम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 3202,-कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धारा 1 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदस शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद‌द्वारा 1 दिसम्बर , 2008 , को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के [अध्याय-4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत हो चुकी है ) अध्याय-3 और 6 धारा 76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और घारा 77 , 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत की जा चुकी है ] के उपयन्ध तमिलनाडु राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत होंगे , अर्थात् केन्द्र

2 J

1. वीरपाण्डौ-गापी टाउन गोपिचेटिटना दम तालुक,

2. परियूर

ईरोड जिला चं गोपिचंटिटपालयम क्षेत्र

3. चोषमादेविवकरै

4. आल्लुक्कुलै ( क )

5. आलुक्कुले ( ख)

6 मोडचूर

7. कुल्लम्पालयम

४. कलंजियम ( क) 6346

PS THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 29, 2008/ AGRAHAYANAY

::: ...

Centre Name

a.Comprising the reverate 9. कलंजियम (ख:

Veerapandı -hop. Tran

Gupichettipalayam area

10. लक्कम्पटटो

Peer

(inpichettipalavan Talak.

आदि के अंतर्गत

वाले राजस्व गांव

Erodedistrict

Bolamadevikkarai [सं. एस. 38013/ 45 /2008 - एस ए

Alukkubi एस. डी. जेवियर, अत्रान

5. Alokkulai ( 13 ) New Delhi, the 19th November.2008

2. Keliamplas

8. Kalangiuot

KalawnB)

Lak kamperis

No. S- 3803 45 S.O. 3202. In exercise of the powers Comkred by sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 1 of the Employee State Insurance Act , 1948 ( 34 of 1948 ) , the Central Govern cal hereby appoints the 1st December. 2008 as the dere en which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Seeneng 11 and 45 which have already been brought into foretard Chapter V and VI [ except sub - section ( i ) of Section 36 Sections 77. 78. 79 and 81 which have already been b into force] of the said Act shali coone into forge in Si following areas in the State of Tamil Nadu namely

SD NOVIR akyS Primed the the Manager, Ciovt. of dress . Ring Road. Mayapure , New

and Published boller of Publicatkins , Delhi - 11054