रजिस्ट्री सं० डी० एल० ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05
REGD . NO . D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003-05 भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 13]
No. 13
नई दिल्ली, मार्ध 22- मार्च 28 , 2009 , शनिवार/चैत्र 1 चैत्र 7 , 1931 NEW DELHI, MARCH 22- MARCH 28, 2009, SATURDAY/ CHAITRA 1-CHAITRA 7, 1931
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II- खण्ड 3 - उप-खण्ड (ii) PART II Section 3-Sub- section ( ii )
भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)
!
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
वित्त मंत्रालय (वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग )
(Department of Financial Services)
नईदिल्ली, 20 फरवरी , 2009
New Delhi , the 20th February , 2009
का.आ. 736. राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खण्ड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उप - धारा 3 ( ज ) और ( 3 - क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतदूद्वारा , श्री के. बी. आर. नायडु को उनकी नियुक्ति की अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्षों के लिए अथवा अगला आदेश होने तक , जो भी पहले ही, ओरियंटल बैंक ऑफ कामर्स के निदेशक मंडल में अंशकालिक गैर सरकारी निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
S.O. 736. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section 3(h) and ( 3 -A) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub - clause ( 1 ) oficlause 3 ofthe Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme , 1970/1980, the Central Government hereby nominates Shri K.B.R. Naidu as part -time non- official Director on the Board of Directors ofOriental Bank ofCommerce, for a period of three years from the date of notification of his appointment or until further orders , whichever is earlier .
[फा. सं. 9/19/2007-बी ओ -1 ]
जी. बी. सिंह, उप सचिव
[F.No. 9/19/2007 -BO- 1 ] G. B. SINGH, Dy. Secy. 992G1/2009
(1371) [PART II-SBC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
1372
नई दिल्ली, 20 फरवरी , 2009
horobynominates Shri S. Shabbeer Pasha as part -time non- official Director on the Board ofDirectors of CanaraBank, foraperiod ofthree years from the date ofnotification of his appointment-er until further orders , whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 9/21/2008-BO-1 ] G.B. SINGH, Dy. Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 20 मार्च , 2009
का.आ. 737.-राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खण्ड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्थ एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उप- धारा 3 ( ज) और ( 3 - क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा , श्री पंकज गोपालजी ठाकर को उनकी नियुक्ति की अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्षों के लिए अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक, जो भी पहले हो , केनरा बैंक के निदेशक मंडल में अंशकालिक गैर सरकारी निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
[फा. सं. 9/21/2008- बी ओ-1 ] जी. बी. सिंह , उप सचिव
NewDelhi, the 20th February, 2009
का.आ. 739. रूग्ण औद्योगिक कंपनी ( विशेष उपबंध ) अधिनियम, 1985 की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) के साथ पठित भारा 5 की उप धारा ( 1 ) एवं ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्द्वारा , श्री अभय कुमार गोहिल , सेवानिवृत्त न्यायाधीश , मध्य प्रदेश उच्च न्यायालय को उनके पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से, उनके 65 वर्ष की आयु प्राप्त कर लेने तक अधना औधोगिक और वित्तीय पुनर्निर्माण अपीलीय प्राधिकरण (एएआईएफआर ) के उत्पादन तक अथवा जो भी पहले हो, एएआईएफआर के अध्यक्ष के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
[फा. सं. 20(2 ) /2002- आईएफ -11 ] जे. एस. फौगाट, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 20th March, 2009
S.O. 737. In exercise ofthe powers conferredby sub-section 3 (h ) and (3 -A) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub-clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 ofthe Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the Central Government herebynominates Shri Pankaj Gopalji Thacker as part -time non-official Director on the Board ofDirectors ofCanara Bank, for a period of three years from the date of notification of his appointment or until further orders , whichever is earlier .
[F. No. 9/21/2008-BO- 1] GB. SINGH, Dy. Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 20 फरवरी , 2009
S.O. 739. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section( 1 ) and (2) of Section 5 read with sub-section (2)ofSection 6ofthe Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 the Central Government hearby appoints Shri Abbey Kumar Gohil , Retd. Judge, Madhya Pradesh Idigh Court, as Chairman, Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (AAIFR )with effect from the date of assumption of the charge of the post, for a period till he attains the age of65 years or till the abolition of AAIFR, whichever event takes place the earlier.
[F. No. 20(2)/2002- IF -11 ] J. S. PHAUGAT, Under Secy.
(सतर्कता अनुभाग )
शुद्धि-पत्र
नई दिल्ली, 16 मार्च , 2009
का.आ. 738, - राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खण्ड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम, 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उप- धारा 3 ( ज ) और ( 3 - क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्द्वारा , श्री एस. शब्बीर पाझा को उनकी नियुक्ति की अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्षों के लिए अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक , जो भी पहले हो , केनरा बैंक के निदेशक मंडल में अंशकालिक गैर सरकारी निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
[फा. सं. 9/21/2008-जी ओ-1 ] जी. बी. सिंह , उप, सचिव
New Delhi , the 20th February, 2009
का.आ. 740.- भारत के राजपत्र के , भाग II , खंड 3 , उप-खंड ( ii ) में 9-15 नवम्बर , 2008 को प्रकाशित वित्त मंत्रालय , वित्तीय सेवाएँ विभाग की साधारण अभिसूचना सं. का.आ. 3042 दिनांक 7 नवम्बर , 2008 में आंशिक संशोचन करते हुए , पंक्ति आठ और नौ में आने वाले शब्दों " 39,200--67,000 रुपए ( वेतन बैंड-4 ) + 10,000 रुपए ग्रेड बेतन के संशोधित वेतनमान में " को " 37,400- 67,000 रुपए ( वेतन बैंड -4 ) + 12,000 रुपए ग्रेड वेतन के संशोधित वेतनमान में " के रूप में पड़ा जाए ।
[फा. सं. 22/4/2003- सतर्कता (खंड- II) ] जे. एस. फौगाट, अवर सचिव S.O. 738. In exercise ofthe powersvers conferred by sub-section 3 (h) and (3 -A) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub-clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 ofthe Nationalised Banks ( Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980, the Central Government 1373
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
(VIGILANCE SECTION)
CORRIGENDUM
(iv ) निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा;
New Delhi, the 16th March, 2009
(v ) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियां और परिसंपत्तियां समान उद्देश्य वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी;
यह अधिसूचना निर्धारिती की ओर से केवल आय के प्राप्तिकर्ता पर लागू होगी और न कि ऐसे प्राप्तिकर्ता की अन्य आय अथवा प्राप्ति पर । आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार कर योग्य आय अथवा, अन्यथा निर्धारिती की आय पर अलग से विचार किया जाएगा ।
S.O. 740. In partial modification ofMinistry of Finance, Department of Financial Services' Notification No. S.O. (E) 3042 dated 7th November, 2008 published in theGazette ofIndia, Part -II , Section -3 , sub-section ( ii) dated November 9 to 15, 2008, the words appearing in line eight (8)and nine(9), "in the revised scale ofpay ofRs. 39,200- 67,000 (PB-4) plus Grade Pay ofRs. 10,000" may be read as "inthe revised scale ofpay ofRs . 37,400-67,000 (PB -4) plusGrade Pay of Rs . 12,000/- " ,
[क्रमांक-मु.आ.आ./उदयपुर/आ.अ. (तक. )/2008-09/3122] (
मुकेश भान्ती, मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त fF. No. 22/4/2003 -Vig. (Vol - II) ] J. S. PHAUGAT , Under Secy.
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Udaipur, the 29th January, 2009 सं. 09/2008-09
कार्यालय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त उदयपुर , 29 जनवरी , 2009 (आयकर)
No.09/2006-09 (INCOME-TAX)
.. 741, आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43 वां) की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23' ग ) की उप- धारा (IV) के साथ पठित आयकर नियमावली, 1962 के नियम 2 ग द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, उदयपुर एतद्वारा "तिलोनिया शोध एवं विकास संस्थान , किशनगढ़ ( राजस्थान ) " को उक्त उप- धारा के प्रयोजनार्थ निर्धारण वर्ष 2007-08 तथा आगे निम्नलिखित शतों के अधीन अनुमोदित करते हैं: -
S.O. 741. In exercise ofthe powers conferredby sub- Section (IV) ofclause (23C) ofSection 10 ofthe income- tax Act, 1961 (43) of 1961) read with rule 2C ofthe Income TaxRules, 1962, I, the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur hereby notify the " Tilonia Shodh Evam - Vikas Sansthan, Kishangarh (Rajasthan ) " for the purpose of the said Sub-clause for the assessment years 2007-08 and onwards subject to the following conditions namely:
(1) The assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;
(i ) निर्धारिती उसकी आय का प्रयोग अथवा उसकी आय का प्रयोग करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतः तथा अंनन्यतः उन उद्देश्योंके लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;
(ii) The assessee will not invest or deposit its funds (other thanvoluntary contribution received and maintained in the form of jewellery, furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above otherwise than in any one or more ofthe forms or modes specified in sub- section (5) of Section 11;
:
(ii ) निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा (5) में यह विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (आभूषण, फर्नीचर इत्यादि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा इसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा;
(iii) This notification will not apply in relationto any income being profits and gains of business, unless the business is incidental to the attainment ofthe objectives ofthe assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;
( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के सम्बन्ध मेंलागू नहीं होगी , जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो ,. जब तक ऐसा करोबार उक्त निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्तिके लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के सम्बन्ध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हों;
1374
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009 /CHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART 11--SEC . 3 ( ii)]
उप- खण्ड ( 23सी ) की उप- धारा ( vi ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप कार्य करे ।
(iv) The assessee will regularly file its return of income before the income - tax authority in accordance, withthe provisions of Income- tax Act, 1961;
[क्रमांक: मुआआआआआ/(मु.)/जय/ 10(23सी)/(vi )/08-09/4339 ]
बी. एस. ढिल्लों, मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त (v) That in the event of dissolution, its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organization with similar objectives ;
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX Jaipur , the 18th March , 2009
No. 19/2008-09
This notification is applicable only to the recipients of income on behalf of the assessee and not to any other receipt or income ofsuch recipients . Taxability or, otherwise of the income of the assessee would be separately considered as per the provisions of Income Tax Act, 1961 .
[No. CCIT/UDR/ITO (Tech .)/2008-09 /3122]
MUKESH BHANTI , Chief Commissioner of Income - tax
(Department ofRevenue)
S.O. 743. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (vi ) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) read with Rule 2CA ofthe Income Tax Rules, 1962, the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur hereby approve " Sanjay. Shiksha Samiti, Jaipur" for the purpose of said Section for the A. Y. 2005-06 and onwards.
(OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI)
CORRIGENDUM
Provided that the society conforms to and complies with the provisions of sub- clause ( vi ) of clause (23C) of Section 10 ofthe Income- tax Act , 1961 read with rule 2CA ofthe Income-tax rules , 1962.
Guwahati , the 5th March , 2009
[No. CCFT/JPR/Addl . CIT(Hqrs .)/ 10(23C)( vi )/2008-09/4339] B. S. DHILLON, Chief Commissioner of Income-tax
(केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड ) नई दिल्ली , 13 मार्च , 2009
S.O. 742. With reference to this office order dated 13th March, 2008 communicated under this office Memo No.A-9/Part- 15 /CCIT/Ghy/Tech/2004-05/25150-51dated 23-02-2009 regarding approval under Sub- Clause (via ) of Clause (23C) ofSection 10 ofthe Income TaxAct, 1961 , it may be read as the " Approval under Sub- Clause ( iv) of Clause (23C) ofSection 10 ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961 " in the case of " K. P. Bethesda Health Society " ( PAN No. AABTK 0834B), P. R. Hill , Kohima, Nagaland for the asstt . years2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10.
का.आ. 744.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम (4) के अनुसरण में राजस्व विभाग के निम्नलिखित कार्यालय , जिसके 80% से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्य साधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , को अधिसूचित करती है:-
Other parts of the order shall remain unchanged. [No.A-9/Part- 15/CCIT/GHY/Tech/2004-05/25612-13 ]
उप आयकर आयुक्त का कार्यालय , एम बी -210, शादी पुर, अंडमान निकोबार द्वीप समूह,
पोर्ट ब्लेयर -744102 ।
I. JAMIR, Jt. Commissioner of Income-tax (Tech), ForChief Commissioner of Income-tax
[फा. सं. एं-11017/2/2009-हिन्दी-3 ] मधु शर्मा, निदेशक ( राजभाषा ) कार्यालय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त जयपुर, 18 मार्च , 2009
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES ) New Delhi , the 13th March , 2009 सं. 19/2008-09
S.O. 744. In pursuance of Sub - rule (4) of Rule 10 oftheOfficial Language (use for official purposes of the Union) Rules , 1976 the Central Government hereby notifies the following office ofthe Department ofRevenue, whereof more than 80% of the staff have acquired the working knowledge ofHindi:
का.आ. 743.- आयकरअधिनियम; 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 वां) की ध ारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 सी ) की उप - धारा ( vi ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त , जयपुर एतद्वारा निध रिण वर्ष 2005-06 एवं आगे के लिए कथित धारा के उद्देश्य से "संजय शिक्षा समिति, जयपुर " को स्वीकृति देते हैं ।
Office oftheDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax, MB-210, Shadipur , Andman Nicobar Islands , PortBlair-744102.
बशर्ते कि समिति आयकर नियम 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 के
[F. No. A -11017/2/2009-Hindi -III ] MADHU SHARMA, Director (OL) 1375
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली , 16 मार्च , 2009
New Delhi , the 16th March, 2009 No. 27/2009
सं. 27/2009
S.O. 745. It is hereby notified for general informa- tion that the organization Barasat Cancer Research and Welfare Centre , Kolkata has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of Section 35 ofthe Income-tax Act, 1961 (said Act), read with Rules SC and SE of the Income-tax Rules , 1962 (saidRules) with effect from 1-4-2009 in the category of 'other Institution' partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions, namely:-
का.आ. 745. सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962(उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5रा और 5ङ के साथ पठितं आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम) की धारा 35 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक1-4-2009 से संगठन बारासात केन्सर रिसर्च एण्ड वेलफेयर सेन्टर, कोलकाता को निम्नलिखत शतों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में संलग्न ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है, नामतः:-
The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;
( i ) अनुमोदित संगठन को पदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;
(ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty mem- bers or its enrolled students ;
(ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा इसके नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा;
(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research, reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research, get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub-section (2) of Section 288 ofthe saidAct and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income- tax or the Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case, by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 139 ofthe saidAct;
(iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता बही रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से ऐसी खाता-बहीं की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ।
(iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।
(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement ofdonations received and amounts applied for scientific research and'a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above.
2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन
2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval ifthe approved organization :-
(क) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अलग लेखा बही नही रखेगा; अथवा
(a) fails to maintain separate books ofaccounts referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1; or
(ख) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा
(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub-paragraph (iii ) ofparagraph 1; or (ग). पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एवं प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा
(c) fails to furnish its statement ofthe donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub-paragraph ( iv) of paragraph 1; or
(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्यकलाप करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्यकलाप को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा
(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or
(ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5ग और 5छ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के उपबंधों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।
(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions ofclause ( ii) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35-ofthe saidAct, read with Rules 5C and 5E of the Rules .
[फा. सं. 203/97/2008/आ.क.नि. - 11 ]
[F. No. 203/97/2008/TTA- 11 ] PADAM SINGH , Under Secy.
पदम सिंह , अवर सचिव
1376
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART II Sec . 3( ii)] नई दिल्ली, 18 मार्च , 2009
उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5ग और 55 के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उप-धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड (ii ) के उपबंधों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।
[फा. सं. 203/ 111 /2007-आ.क.नि. - 11 ]
पदम सिंह, अवर सचिव का.आ. 746. - सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्दद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग और 55 के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड (ii) के प्रो दिनांक 1-4-2008 से संगठन उपासी टी रिसर्च फाउंडेशन, नूर मिलनाडु को निम्नलिखित शों के अधीन आआंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में संलग्न ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , नामतः
NewDelhi, the 18th March,2009 (1) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;
(i) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा इसके नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा;
S.O. 746. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Upasi Tea Research Foundation, Coeneor, TamilNadu has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause (ii ) of sub-section( 1 ) of Section 35 ofthe Income-tax Act , 1961 (saidAct), read with Rules SC and of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (sakiRules), with effect from 1-4-2008 in the category of' other Institution', partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely:--
The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;
(ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;
(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता बही रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप-कात (2) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से ऐसी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;
(iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सरभाषित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा 1
2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-
(क) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii) में उल्लिखित अलग लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा
(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research, reflect thorpinahe amounts used for carrying ant research, get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub-section (2) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report ofsuch audit duły signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income-tax or the Director of Income -tax having jurisdiction over the case, by the duedate of furnishing the return of income under Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 139 ofthe saidAct;
( ख) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ (iii) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा ; अथवा
(iv) The approved organization shall maintain aseparate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report ofaudit referred to above .
3 (ग ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप -पैराग्राफ (iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एवं प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा
2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization:-
(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or
(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्यकलाप करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्यकलाप को जायज नहीं पाया आएगा; अथवा 1377 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II- सखण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
MINISTRYOF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
(DepartmentofHealth and FamilyWelfare) NewDelhi , the 6th March, 2009.
(b) fails to furnish its audit report referredto in sub-paragraph (iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or
(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub- paragraph (iv) ofparagraph 1 ; or
S.O. 747. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council ofIndia, hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Scheduleto the saidAct, namely:-
(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or
(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions ofclause (ii) of sub-section( 1) ofSection 35 ofthe said Act read with rules 5C and 5E ofthe said Rules .
In the said First Schedule after " Rajiv Gandhi University ofHealth Sciences ,Banglore"under the heading 'RecognizedMedical Qualification' [in column (2) ] and under the heading ' Abbreviation for Registration" [ in column(3) ] , the following shall be inserted, namely: - (2) (3)
[F. N. 203/ 111 /2007-[TA- II ] PADAM SINGH, Under Secy.
Bachelor ofMedicine M.B.B.S. andBachelor of Surgery
स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय (स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण विभाग )
नई दिल्ली , 6 मार्च , 2009
(Thisshall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by Rajiv Gandhi University ofHealth Sciences, Banglore, Karnataka after Feb. 2007 in respect ofstudents of Dr. S.NijalingappaMedical College&Hospital , Bagalkot, Karnataka)
[No.U.12012/72/ 1999-ME(P- II ) N. BARIK, Under Secy.
स्वास्थ्यविभाग
नईदिल्ली, 13 मार्च, 2009 का.आ. 747, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान से परामर्श करने के पश्चात्, भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 (1956का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:-
का. आ. 748. केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद से परामर्श करने के बाद दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उपधारा (2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए एतदद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित में संशोधन करती है ; अर्थात्:
उक्त प्रथम अनुसूची में " राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , बंगलुरू " के सामने शीर्षक ' मान्यताप्राप्त आयुर्विज्ञान अर्हता' [स्तंभ ( 2 ) में ] के अंतर्गत एवं शीर्षक " पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण " [ स्तंभ (3 ) में ] के अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित को अंन्तः स्थापित कियाजाएगा , अर्थात्ः-
(3)
(2)
2. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम संख्या 75 के बाद निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या एवं प्रविष्टियां रखा जाएंगी , अर्थात्:-
एम.बी.बी.एस.
"76. कन्नूर विश्वविद्यालय ,
कन्नूर
आयुर्विज्ञान एवं शल्य विज्ञान स्नातक
II . सेंचुरी इंटरनेशनल इंस्टीच्यूट आफ डेंटल साइसिज एंड रिसर्च सेन्टर, कालीकट, केरल
(i ) दंत शल्य चिकित्सा बौडीएस , कन्नूर विश्व
(जब 11-4-2008 को या इसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो) (यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी यदि यह राजीव गांधी स्वास्थय विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , बंगलुरू , कर्नाटक द्वारा डा. एस. निजलिंगप्पा चिकित्सा महाविद्यालय एवं अस्पताल , बागलकोट , कर्नाटक के छात्रों के संबंध में फरवरी , 2007 के बाद प्रदान की गई हो)
विद्यालंय , कक्रूर" [सं. यू-12012/72/1999- एम ई (पी- II) ]
[सं. वी.--12017/57/2002- डी ई ] राज सिंह , अवर सचिव
एन. बारिक , अवर सचिव
1378
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART II-Sec. 3 (ii)] Department ofHosit New Delhi , the 13 March,2009
NewDelhi , the20thMarch,2009
S. O. 748.-In exercise ofthe powers conferredby sub-section (2) ofSection 10 ofthe Dentists Act , 1948 (16 of1948), the Central Government , after consultation with DentalCouncil ofIndia, hereby, makes the following armend- ments in Part- I ofthe Schedule to the said Act, namely:-
2.Inpart- 1 ofthe Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948, after serial No. 75, the following serial number and entries shall be inserted, namely:-
S.O. 749.-Whereas the Central Government , in pursuance ofclause (a) of sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) and in consultation with the Government of Himachal Pradesh have nomminatedDr (Smt. ) Jaishree Sharma, Director ,Medical Eduontion andResearch, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla to be a meraber of the Medionl Council of India with effect from the date of issue ofthis notification upto 5-12-2009.
"76. Kannur University, Kannur.
II . Century International Institue ofDental Sciences & Research Centre, Calicut, Kerala
Now, therefore , in pursuance of the provision of sub section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendment in the Notification ofthe Government of India in the then Ministry ofHealth number S.O. 138 dated the 9th January , 1960, namely:
BDS, Kannur University, Kannur
(i)Bachelor ofDental Surgery (When granted on or after 11-4-2008)
[No. V- 12017/57/2002-DE] RAJ SINGH, Under Secy.
In the said Notification , under the heading , "Nominated under clause (a) ofsub section ( 1 ) ofSection 3", for scrial number 21 and the entries thereto, the following entries shall be substituted, namely:-
नई दिल्ली, 20 मार्च, 2009
"21.Dr (Smt. ) Jaishree Sharma Director Medical Education and Research
Government of Himachal Pradesh"
Himachal Pradesh
Shimla
[No.V.11013/1 /2009- ME (P-1) ] K.V.S. RAO, Dy. Secy.
मानण संस्कधन विकास मंत्रालय
का. आ. 749.-केन्द्र सरकार ने भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में और हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार से परामर्श करने के बाद डॉ. ( श्रीमती ) जयश्री शर्मा , निदेशक चिकित्सा शिक्षा एवं अनुसंधान , हिमाचल प्रदेश , शिमला को इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने कीतारीख से 5-12-2009 तक के लिए भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् के सदस्य के रूप में मनोनीत किया है ।
(उच्यतर शिक्षा विभाग )
नई दिल्ली, 24, फरवरी, 2009
अतः , अब, उक्त अधिसूचना की धारा 3 की उप- धारा (1 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा भारत सरकार के तत्कालीन स्वास्थ्यमंत्रालय की दिनांक 9 जनवरी, 1960 की अधि- सूचना संख्या का.आ. 138 में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है अर्थात्ः
का. आ. 750, केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाक (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप-नियम 4 के अनुसरण में एतद्द्वारा मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय के अधीन निम्नलिखित केन्द्रीय विद्यालयों को, जिनके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, अधिसूचित करती है:--
उक्त अधिसूचना में शीषर्क " धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड (क) के अधीन मनोनीत " शीर्षक के अंतर्गत क्रम संख्या 21 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी , अर्थात्ः-
1. केन्द्रीय विललय , चित्तौड़गढ़
"21. डॉ. ( श्रीमती) , हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार "
2. केन्द्रीय विद्यालय , डूंगरपुर
जयश्री शर्मा
निदेशक
[सं. 11011-1/2009- रा.भा.ए. ] अनिता भटनागर जैन, संयुक्त सचिव
चिकित्सा शिक्षा एवंअनुसंधान हिमाचल प्रदेश
MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT (Deptt. ofHigher Education)
शिमला
NewDelhi, the 24. February,2009
[सं. वी. - 11013/1 /2009- एम ई (नीति-1 ) ]
के.वी.एस.राव, उप सचिव
S.O. 750.-Inpursuance ofsub rule (4) ofrule 10 of the Official. Language (Use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies 1379
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
the following Kendriya Vidyalayas under the Ministry of Human Resource Development, whose more than 80% members ofthe staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi:-
the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indidan Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
1. Kendriya Vidyalaya, Chitoorgarh
Date from which
No. & year
Sl . No. & Year ofthe
No. Indidan Standard ( s) of the
the amendment shall have effect
amendment
amendment (s)
2.Kendriya Vidyalaya, Dungarpur [No.11011-1 /2009-O.L.U. ] ANITA BHATNAGAR JAIN, Jt. Secy.
(4) उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय
(3)
(1).
(2)
(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )
1 IS 277 :2003
Amendment 4 March , 2009 No. 3 , February,
2009
भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नई दिल्ली, 9 मार्च , 2009
Galvanized steel sheets ( Plain and corrugated) Specification (sixthrevision)
का.आ. 751.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक (कों) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :
अनुसूची
संशोधन की संख्या
क्र.सं.
संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि
और वर्ष
मानक (कों) की
संशोधित भारतीय संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक
Copy ofthisStandard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
संशोधन संख्या 4मार्च, 2009
1 आईएस 277:2003
3, फरवरी , 2009
जस्तीकृत इस्पात
[Ref: MTD 4 /T -22 ] Dr. (Smt .) SNEH BHATLA, Sc . F and Head (MTD) नई दिल्ली , 9 मार्च , 2009
की चद्दरें ( सादी तथा नालीदार) -विशिष्टि
(छठा पुनरीक्षण)
का.आ. 752.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7के उप -नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक (कों) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :
अनुसूची
क्र. सं. संशोधित भारतीय
इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
संशोधन की संख्या संशोधन लागू और वर्ष होने का तिथि
मानक (कों) की
संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक
[संदर्भ: एमटीडी4/टी-22 ] डा. ( श्रीमति ) स्नेह भाटला , वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
4मार्च, 2009
संशोधन संख्या
1
MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
आईएस 14650 :1999
1, फरवरी, 2009
पुनर्वेल्लन के लिए
कार्बन इस्पात ढलवाँ
(Deptt. ofConsumer Affairs) BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS New Delhi , the 9th March, 2009
बिलेट इंगट, बिलेट , ब्लूम और स्लैब-
विशिष्टि
S.O. 751. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) ofRule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987 ,
992G1/09-2 i
1380
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART II SEC. 3 (ii) ]
अनुसूची
क्रम संस्तेषित भारतीय संशोधन की संख्या और वर्ष
मानक (कॉ) की
संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि
संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक
(1) (2)
(3)
(4) इन संशोधनों की प्रतियों भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , भानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
1. आईएस 3024:2006 संशोधन संख्या 4 मार्च, 2009
1 , फरवरी , 2009
[संदर्भ : एमटीडी4/टी-204 ]
डा. ( श्रीमति) स्नेह भाटला, वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी)
दिशात्मक कण विद्युत इस्पात की चदरें और पत्तियाँ विशिष्टि (दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)
NewDelhi, the 9th March , 2009
S.O. 752. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub- rule (1 ) ofRule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:
इन संशोधनों की प्रतियों भारतीय मानक की प्रतियों भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेपई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमादाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुबनेश्वर , कोयम्बूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरून में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं । SCHEDULE
[संदर्भ : एमटीडी 4/टी -69 ]
डा. (श्रीमति ) स्नेह भाटला , वैज्ञानिक एफ एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी) Sl . No. & Year ofthe No. Indian Standard (s) amendment(s)
No.& year ofthe amendment
New Delhi , the 9th, March, 2009 Date from which the amendment shall have effect
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
1 IS 14650: 1999 Amendment 4 March, 2009 No.1 , February,
S.O. 753. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) ofRule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
Carbon steel cast billet ingots, billets, 2009 blooms and slabs for rerolling purposes
Specification
No. & year of the amendment
Sl. No. & Year of the No. Indian Standrad (s) amendment(s)
Date from which the amendment shall have effect
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
IS3024:2006 Grain Amendment 4 March 2009 No. 1 , February,2009
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with rhe Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune. Thiruvananthapuram .
1. oriented electrical steel sheet and strip (second revision)
[Ref: MTD4/T-204]
Dr. ( Smt .) SNEH BHATLA , Sc . Fans Head (MTD)
नई दिल्ली , 9 में 1009
Copy of this Standard is available for sale with rhe Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices; NewDelhi, KolkataChandigarh, Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram .
[Ref: MTD4/T-69] का.आ. 753. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1989 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( खः अनुसरणवरतीय अरुक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक (कों) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये है :
Dr. ( Smt. ) SNEH BHATLA, Sc.-F and Head ( MTD) 1381
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 16 मार्च , 2009
नई दिल्ली, 13 मार्च , 2009
का.आ. 754.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि अनुसूची में दिये गये मालक (कों) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :
का.आ. 755.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड (ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि अनुसूची में गये मानक (कों) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं
अनुसूची
नसूची
क्रम संशोधित भारतीय
क्रम भारताय
संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि
संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि
संख्या मानक की
संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि
संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि
संख्या माजक की
संख्या और वर्ष
संख्या और वर्ष
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
(4)
(3)
(1)
(2)
फरवरी, 2009
1. आईएस 14887:2000
5 फरवरी , 2009 12 मार्च,
1 आईएस 15328 :2003
संशोधन संख्या 2फरवरी , 2009
2009 यह संशोधन प्रति भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , भानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेभई, मुम्बई तथा शशाखा कार्यालयोंः अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
इन संशोधनों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नईदिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयोंः अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।
[संदर्भ: टी एक्स डी/जी -25 ]
[संदर्भ: सीईडी/राजपत्र ] पी. भटनागर, वैज्ञानिक ई एवं प्रमुख ( टीएक्सडी)
ए. के. सैनी , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' पूतं प्रमुख NewDelhi, the13th March, 2009
(सिविल इंजीनियरी )
New Delhi, the 16th March, 2009 S.O. 754. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) ofRule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the amendment to the Indian Standard, particulars of which is given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued:
SCHEDULE
S.O. 755. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) ofRule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the amendment to the Indian Standards , particulars ofwhich is givenin the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :
SCHEDULE
Sl . No. & Year ofthe No. Indian Standards
Date from which the amendment shall have effect
No. & year ofthe amendment
No. & year ofthe
Sl . No. & Year of No. the Indian
(4)
(3)
(1) (2)
amendment
Date from which the amendment shall have effect
Standards
1 IS 14887 :2000
(4)
(3)
(1) (2)
February, 2009
Amendment No. 2
5 February, 2009 12 March, 2009
1 IS 15328:2003
February, 2009
Copy of this standards is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices: NewDelhi , Kolkata Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram .
Copy of this Amendment is available for sale with theBureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .
[Ref: CED/Gazette]
[Ref: TXD/G-25]
A. K. SAINI , Sc . ' F ' & Head (Civil Engg.) [P. BHATNAGAR, Sc.'E' & Head (Textiles ) ]
f 1382
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART IISBC. 3( ii )]
नई दिल्ली , 16 मार्च , 2009
का.आ. 756.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-
अनुसूची
स्थापित तिथि क्रम संख्या
स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कॉ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक
नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मागक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
31मार्च, 2009 1. आई एस/ आईएसओ 7452 : 2002 तप्त बेल्लित संरचना इस्पात की प्लेटें--आयाम एवं आकार हेतु छूटें
इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर भार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयोंः अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं।
[संदर्भः एमटीडी4/टी-217 ]
डा. ( श्रीमति) स्नेह भाटला , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी)
New Delhi , the 16th March , 2009
S.O. 756.-In pursuance of clause (b) ofsub- rule ( 1 ) ofRule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:---
SCHEDULE
DateofEstablished SL. No. & Year of the Indian Standards No. Established
No. & Year of the Indian Standards , ifany, Superseded by the New
Indian Standard
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4) 1 .
31March,2009 IS/ISO 7452: 2002 Hot- rolled structural steel plates-Tolerances on dimensions and shape
Copy ofthis Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolcatta, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .
[Ref: MTD4/T-217]
Dr.(Mrs.) SNEH BHATLA, Scientist ' F' & Head ( Met Engg. )
नई दिल्ली , 16 मार्च , 2009
का.आ. 757.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यरो एतद्द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/ किये गये हैं :
अनुसूची
संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि
क्रम संख्या
संशोधित भारतीय मानक (कों) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक
संशोधम लागू होने कीतिथि (1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
संशोधन संख्या 2 , फरवरी , 2009
12मार्च, 2009 1 . आई एस 15391 : 2003 अतप्त बेल्लित गैर-दिशात्मक विद्युत् इस्पात की चद्दर एवं पत्ती अर्ध- प्रकृमित प्ररूप-विशिष्टि 1383
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाय II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
इन संशोधनों, की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयोंः अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिकी हेतु उपलब्ध हैं।
[संदर्भ: एमटीडी 4/टी-212 ]
डा. ( श्रीमति ) स्नेह भाटला, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख (एमटीड़ी)
NewDelhi , the 16th March, 2009
S.O. 757. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars ofwhich are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:-
SCHEDULE
No. & year of the amendment
SL No.
No. & Year ofthe Indian Standards (s) the amendment (s)
Date from which the amendment shall have effect
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
2009 1
Amendment no . 2 February2009
IS15391 : 2003 Cold -rolled non-oriented electrical steel sheet and strip- Semi-processed type- Specification
Copy of this Standard is availble for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and alsoBranch Offices:Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .
[Ref.: MTD 4/T -212]
DR. (MRS .) SNEH BHATLA, Scientist ' F ' & Head ( Met Engg.)
कोयला मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली , 18 मार्च, 2009
का.आ. 758.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि , इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है ;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस क्षेत्र में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ।
इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. एसईसीएल/बीएसपी /जीएम ( पीएलजी) / भूमि/328 तारीख 24 अक्तूबर , 2008 कानिरीक्षण कलेक्टर , सरगुजा ( छत्तीसगढ ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , कांउसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता 700001 के कार्यालय में या साऊथ ईर्स्टन कोल्फील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व अनुभाग ) , सीपत रोड, बिलासपुर-495006 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है । इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाली भूमि में हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चाटों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से नब्बे दिन के भीतर , भारसाधक अधिकारी या विभागाध्यक्ष ( राजस्व ) साऊथ ईर्स्टन कोल्फील्ड्स लिमिटेड , सीपत रोड , बिलासपुर-495006 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) को भेजेगें ।
अनुसूची
भटगांव ब्लाक, भटगांव क्षेत्र
जिला-सरगुजा ( छत्तीसगढ़ )
रेखांक संख्या- एसईसीएल/बीएसपी/जीएम ( पीएलजी ) /भूमि/328 , तारीख 24 अक्तूबर, 2008
टिष्पणी
क्षेत्र हेक्टर में
जिला
तहसील
ग्राम नम्बर
ग्राम
क्रम संख्या
पटवारी हल्का नम्बर
भाग
27.460
भैयाथान
भाग
70.390
भैयाथान
सरगुजा सरगुजा
14 16
28 28
दुग्गा बरौधी
1. 2
कुल क्षेत्र:-97.850 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 241.790 एकड़ ( लगभग) 1384
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009ACHAITRA 7 , 1931
[PART IISEC . 3( ii)] सीमा वर्णन:-
क-ख रेखा ग्राम दुग्गा में " क " बिन्दु से आरंभ होती है और ग्राम दुग्गा के पूर्वी भाग से होती हुई ग्राम दुग्गा-बरौधी के सम्मिलित सीमा में बिन्दु " ख " परःमिलती है ।
ख-ग रेखा ग्राम बरौधी के उत्तरी भाग से होती हुई " ग " बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।
ग-घ रेखा ग्राम बरौभी के पश्चिमी भाग सेहोती हुई जसी ग्राम में किन्दु " म " पर मिलती है ।
घ-क रेखा ग्राम बरौधी से होती हुई ग्राम दुग्गा में प्रवेश करती है और आरंभिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है ।
[पह. सं. 43015/30/2008-पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]
एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव
MINISTRY OF COAL
New Delhi , the 18th March, 2009
S.O. 758. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that Coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the locality mentioned in the Schedule hereto apnexed.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein.
TheplanbearingNumber. SECL/BSP/GM(PLG)/LAND /328 dated 24th October , 2008 of the area coveredby this notification can be inspected in the office of the Collector , Surguja (Chhattisgarh) or in the Office of the Coal Controller, 1,Council House Street, Kolkata - 700001 or in the Office ofthe South Eastern Coalfields Limited (Revenue Section ), Seepat Road,Bilaspur -495006 (Chhattisgarh).:
All persons interested in the land covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , charts and other documents referred to in sub-section (7) of Section 13 of the said Act to the Officer - in- Charge or Head of the Department (Revenue) , South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur - 495006 (Chhattisgarh), within ninety days from the date of publication ofthis notification in the Official Gazette.
SCHEDULE
Bhatgnon Block,BhatgsonAres
District -Surguja (Chhattisgarh)
PlanNumber: SECL/BSP/GM (PLG ) LAND/328 dated 24th October, 2008
Village
Tahsil
District
Remarks S1 . No.
Village number
Area in hectares
Patwari Halka number
1.
28
14
Dugga
Surguja
2.
28
Baroudhi
16
27.460 70.390
Part Part
Bhaiyatkaa
Bhaiyathen
Total:-97.850hectares (Approximately)
Or241.79 acrpe (Approximately)
BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION :-
A-B Line starts from point ' A' in the villages Dugga and passes through eastern part of the village Dugga and meets at point 'B ' on the common boundary ofvillages Dugga - Baroudhi .
B-C Line passes through northern part of village Baroudhi and meets at point 'C' .
C-D Line passes through western part of village Baroudhi and meets at point ' D' in the same village .
D-A Line passes through village Baroudhi then enter in village Dugga and meets at starting point ' A' .
[No.43015/30/2004- PRIW -1 ]
M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy.
1385 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ].
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
नईदिल्ली , 18 मार्च , 2009
का.आ. 759.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 4 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार ने कोयला मंत्रालय के द्वारा जारी की गई अधिसूचना सं. का. आ. 1927 तारीख 28 जून, 2007 जो भारत सरकार के राजपत्र के भाग II , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) , तारीख 7 जुलाई , 2007 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका माप 86.871 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 214.66 एकड़ ( लगभग ) है , कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना में संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट उक्त भूमि के भाग में कोयला अभिप्राप्त है :
अतः केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 7 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट उक्त भूमि के ऊपर या सभी अधिकारों में वर्णित 70.371 हेक्टर (लगभग ) या 173.89 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप की उस भूमि का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है;
टिप्पण 1 :-इस अधिसूचना के अधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. एसईसीएल/बीएसपी /जीएम/पीआईजी/लैंड/332 तारीख 19 नवम्बर , 2008 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर , जिला शहडोल ( मध्य प्रदेश ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काउंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता-70001 के कार्यालय में या साऊथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व अनुभाग ) , सीपत रोड , बिलासपुर-495001 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।
टिप्पण 2:-कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है , जिसमें निम्नलिखित उपबंध हैं :-
अर्जन के बाबत आपत्तियां :-
" 8 ( 1 ) कोई व्यक्ति जो किसी भूमि में जिसकी बाबत् धारा 7 के अधीन अधिसूचना निकाली गई है, हितबद्ध है , अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्ही अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के बारे में आपत्ति कर सकेगा ।
स्पष्टीकरण :-इस धारा के अतंर्गत यह आपत्ति नहीं मानी जाएगी कि कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन संक्रियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संक्रियाएं केन्द्रीय सरकार या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नहीं करनी चाहिए ।
(2 ) उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन प्रत्येक आपत्ति सक्षम अधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जाएगी और सक्षम अधिकारी , आपत्तिकर्ता को स्वयं सुने जाने , विधि व्यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपत्तियों को सुनने के पश्चात् और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जांच , यदिकोई हो, करने के पश्चात्, जो वह आवश्यक समझता है , वह या तो धारा 7 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि का या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में विभिन्न रिपोटों या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़े या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आपत्तियों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार को उसके विनिश्चय के लिए देगा । (3 ) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबद्ध समझा जाएगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होगा, यदि भूमि या किसी ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर लिए गए थे । "
टिप्पण 3 :-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काऊंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता-700001 को उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 के अधीन अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 905 , तारीख 20 मार्च , 1987 द्वारा सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियुक्त किया है ओ भारत के राजपत्र भाग II , खण्ड-3 , उप-खण्ड( ii ) तारीख 4 अप्रैल , 1987 में प्रकाशित किया गया था ।
अनुसूची
धनपुरी ओपन कास्ट माईन विस्तार, सोहागपुर क्षेत्र जिला- शहडोल , मध्य प्रदेश
(क) सबस्व भूमि:-
जिला क्षेत्र हेक्टर में
तहसील
टिप्पण क्रम संख्या
पटवारी हल्का नम्बर
बंदोबस्त नम्बर
ग्राम का नाम
4.418
शहडोल
1.
बेम्होरी 97
सोहागपुर
भाग भाग
11.489
2
शहडोल
724 987
सिलपरी 98
सोहागपुर
योग क्षेत्र :-15.907 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 39.31 एकड़ ( लगभग ) 1386
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART II Sec. 3 ( ii) (ख) वनः भूमि:
रेंज
क्रम संख्या कम्पार्टमेंट सं.
डिवीजन
क्षेत्र हेक्टर में
टिप्पण
1.
74 IV.
52.750
दक्षिण शहडोल
भाम
बुढ़ार
2
77 XIX
1.714
भाग
दक्षिण शहडोल
पुढ़ार
बोग क्षेत्र :-54.464 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 134.58 एकड़ (लगभग) कुल योग क्षेत्र ( कख) :-70.371 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 173.89 एकड़ (लगभग) 1. ग्राम बेम्होरी ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या :-
36 ( भाग ) , 38 ( भाग ) , 39 से 41 , 528 से 531 , 538 , 539 ( भाग ) , 540 ( भाग ) , 541 ( भाग ) ,
1 2 ग्राम सिलपरी ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या :
314 ( भाग ) , 327 ( भाग ) , 328 ( भाग ) , 329 ( भाग ) , 332 ( भाग ) , 333 से 355 , 356 ( भाग ) , 357 ( भाग ) , 359 ( भाग ) , 360 , 361( भाग ) , 362, 363, 364 ( भाग ) , 365 ( भाग ) , 369 ( भाग) , 376 ( भाग ) , 377
सीमा वर्णन:-
क-ख रेखा ग्राम बेम्होरी के सीमा में बिन्दु " क " से आरंभ होती है और फारेस्ट कम्पार्टमेन्ट संख्या 74, IV एवं ग्राम बेहोरी के प्लाट संख्या 38 से गुजरती है फिर ग्राम सिलपरी के प्लाट संख्या 314 , 327 , 329, 332, 356, 369 से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु "ख " पर मिलती है ।
ख-ग रेखाग्राम सिलपारी के प्लाट संख्या 369, 357 , 359, 361 , 365 , 364, 376 और फारेस्ट कम्पार्टमेन्ट संख्या 77 XIX से गुजरती हुई और बिन्दु " ग " पर मिलती है ।
ग-घ रेखा फारेस्ट कम्पार्टमेन्ट संख्या 77 XIX और ग्राम सिलपारी के प्लाट संख्या 314 से गुजरती है फिर फारेस्ट कम्पार्टमेन्ट संख्या 74 IV और ग्राम बेम्होरी के प्लाट संख्या 538 के पूर्वी सीमा से होती हुई और बिन्दु " घ " पर मिलती है । घ-रु रेखा ग्राम बेम्होरी के प्लाट संख्या 538 के दक्षिणी सीमा और प्लाट संख्या 539 , 540 और 541 से गुजरती है फिर फारेस्ट कम्पार्टमेन्ट संख्या 74 IV दक्षिणी सीमा से होती हुई और बिन्दु " ङ " पर मिलती है ।
कु-क रेखा फारेस्ट कम्पार्टमेन्ट संख्या 74 IV के दक्षिणी सीमा और ग्राम बेम्होरी के प्लाट संख्या 36 फारेस्ट कम्पार्टमेन्ट संख्या 74 IV के दक्षिणी और पश्चिमी सीमा से होती हुई आरंभिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती हैं ।
[फा.सं. 43015/4/2007-पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]
एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 18th March, 2009
S.O. 759. Whereas , by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 1927 dated 28th June, 2007 issued under sub- section (1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal BearingAreas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) and published in the Gazette of India, Part- II , Section 3 , Sub-section ( ii) dated the 7th July , 2007, the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 86.871 hectares (approximately) or 214.66 acres (approximately) ofthe lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification ;
* Andwhereas, the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands specified in the Schedule appended to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the land measuring 70.371 hectares (approximately) or 173.89 acres (approximately) as all rights in or over the said lands specified in the Schedule appended hereto .
Note 1 : The plan bearing number SECL/BSP/GM/PIG/LAND/332 dated the 19th November , 2008 ofthe area coveredby this notification may be inspected at the office ofthe Collector, Shahdol , Madhya Pradesh or at the office ofthe Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata -700001 or at the office ofthe South Eastern Coalfields Limited (Revenue Section) , Seepat Road , Bilaspur -495006, Chhattisgarh .
1387
भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
Note 2:-Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of Section 8 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Develop- ment) Act , 1957 which provides as follows :-
"8(1 ) Any person interested in any land in respect ofwhich a notification under Section 7 has been issued may, within thirty days ofthe issue of the notification, object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over such land .
Explanation:-It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himselfdesires to undertake mining operation in the land for the production of coal and that such operation should not be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person .
(2)Every objection under sub - section ( 1 ) shall be made to the competent authority in writing, and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall, after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry , if any, as he thinks necessary , either makes a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 7 or of rights in or over such land , or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land, to the Central Government, containing his recommendations on the objections , together with the record of the proceedings held by him, for the decision of that Government .
(3 ) For the purposes of this section , a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act. " Note 3 : The Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street, Kolkata- 700001 , has been appointed by the Central Government as the competent authority under Section 3 of the said Act, vide notification number S.O. 905 , dated the 20th March, 1987, published in Part II , Section 3 , Sub- section (ii ) of the Gazette of India, dated the 4th April, 1987.
SCHEDULE
Dhanpuri OCM Extension , SohagpurArea
District Shahdol , Madhya Pradesh
A. Revenue land:
Remarks
District
Tahsil
Bandobast
Patwari
Area in hectares
number
Serial number
Name of village
halka number
4.418
Part
Shahdol
724
Bemohuri
97
Sohagpur
1.
Part
11.489
Shahdol
987
2.
98
Sohagpur
Silpari
Total Area 15.907 hectares (approximately ) or 39.31 acres (approximately) .
B. Forest land:
Remarks
Area in hectares
Division
Range
Compartment number
Serial number
52.750
Part
South Shahdol
Burhar
74IV
1.
Part
1.714
South Shahdol
Burhar
77 XIX
2.
Total Area 54.464 hectares (approximately) or 134.58 acres (approximately).
Grand Total Area (A+ B ) = 70.371 hectares ( approximately)
or 173.89 acres (approximately) 1. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Bemohuri (Part): 36(P), 38 (P) , 39 to41 , 528 to 531 , 538 , 539(P ), 540(P) , 541 (P) .
2. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Silpari (Part) :
314(P), 327(P), 328 (P) , 329(P) , 332(P), 333 to 355 , 356(P), 357(P.), 359(P), 360, 361 (P), 362 , 363, 364(P), 365(P) , 369(P), 376(P), 377.
992G1/09-3 1388
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] Boundarydescription:
A-B: Line starts from point "A" on the village boundary of Bemohuri and passes through forest compartment number 74 IV, plot numbers 38 of village Bemohuri then enter in village Silpari and passes through plot numbers 314, 327, 329, 332, 356, 369 and meets at point "B" .
B-C: Line passes in village Silpari through plot numbers 369 , 357, 359, 361 , 365, 364 , 376, forest compartment number 77XIX and meets at point " C" .
C-D: Line passes through forest compartment number 77 XIX and plot numbers 314 of village Silpari then through forest compartment number 74 1V after that eastern boundary ofplot number 538 of village Bemohuri and meets at point "D".
D-E: Line passes in village Bemohuri along southern boundary ofplot number 538 and through plot numbers 539 , 540 and 541 then southern boundary of forest compartment number 74 IV and meets at point "E " .
E-A: Line passes along the southern boundary offorest compartment number 74 IV and through plot number 36 ofvillage Bemohuri then along the southern and western boundary offorest compartment number 74 IV and meets at starting point "A" .
[F. No. 43015/4/2007 -PRIW - I ]
M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 18 मार्च , 2009
का.आ. 760.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि, इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है ;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तिामों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ;
इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले रेखा संख्यांक सी-1 ( ई ) III/जेजेएमआर/ 768/0908 , तारीख 17 सितम्बर , 2008 का निरीक्षण वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व अनुभाग ) , कोल ईस्टेट, सिविल लाईन्स, नागपुर-440001 ( महाराष्ट्र) के कार्यालय में या मुख्य महाप्रबंधक ( एक्सप्लोरेशन प्रभाग ) , केंद्रीय खान , योजना और डिजाइन संस्थान , गोंडवाना प्लेस , कौंके रोड़ , राँची ( झारखंड ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काऊंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता के कार्यालय में या कलेक्टर और जिला मजिस्ट्रेट , चंद्रपुर ( महाराष्ट्र) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ;
इस अधिसूचना के अतंर्गत आनेवाली भूमि में, हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चारों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से नब्बे दिन के भीतर , विशेष कार्य अधिकारी ( भूमि/राजस्व) , वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड , राजस्व विभाग , कोल इस्टेट , सिविल लाईन्स, नागपुर -440001 ( महाराष्ट्र) को भेजेंगे ।
अनुसूची
देउलवाडा एक्सपान्शन ब्लॉक
माजरी क्षेत्र
जिला चंद्रपुर ( महाराष्ट्र).
[रेखा संख्याक सी-1 ( ई ) III/जेजेएमआर/768-0908 , तारीख 17 सितम्बर , 2008 ]
क्रम संख्या ग्राम का नाम
पटवारी सर्कल तहसील
जिला
क्षेत्रफल (लगभग) टिप्पणी
संख्या
हेक्टर
1.
देउलवाडा
4
भद्रावती
3.59
चंद्रपुर
पूर्ण
कुल क्षेत्र: -3.59 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 8.87 एकड़ ( लगभग )
सीमा वर्णन:-
क-ख रेखा ग्राम देउलवाडा में बिन्दु " क " से आरंभ होती है और प्लॉट संख्या 80 और प्लॉट संख्या 78 की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा' से लगकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु " ख " पर मिलती है । [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1389
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
ख-ग: रेखा प्लॉट संख्या 80 और प्लॉट संख्या 77 की सम्मिलित सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है फिर प्लॉट संख्या 80 और प्लॉट संख्या 81 की सम्मिलित सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु " ग " पर मिलती है ।
ग -घ: रेखा प्लॉट संख्या 80 और प्लॉट संख्या 82 की सम्मिलित सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है फिर प्लॉट संख्या 80 और प्लॉट संख्या 83 की सम्मिलित सीमा से गुजरती है और बिन्दु " छ " पर मिलती है ।
घ-क: रेखा प्लॉट संख्या 80 और प्लॉट संख्या 79 की सम्मिलित सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु आरम्भिक " क " पर मिलती है ।
[फा.सं. 43015/29/2008- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]
एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 18th March, 2009
S.O. 760. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that Coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the localitymentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act; 1957 (20 of 1957 ) , (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein.
The plan bearing Number C- 1 (E) III/ JJMR/ 768-0908 dated the 17th September , 2008 of the area covered by this notification can be inspected in the officeInspected office of the Western Coalfields Limited (Revenue Department ), Coal Estate , Civil Lines , Nagpur-440001 (Maharashtra) or at the office ofthe ChiefGeneral Manager (Exploration Division) , Central Mine Planning and Design Institute , Gondwana Place, Kanke Road, Ranchi or at the office of the Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata or at the office of the District Collector, Chandrapur (Maharashtra) .
All persons interested in the lands covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , charts and otherdocuments referred to in sub -section (7 ) of section 13 of the said Act to the Officer on Special Duty (Land/ Revenue ) , Western Coalfields Limited (Revenue Department ) , Coal Estate , Civil Lines , Nagpur- 440001 ( Maharashtra ) within ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette.
SCHEDULE
Deulwada ExpansionBlock
Majri Area
District Chandrapur ( Maharashtra)
Plan Number C- 1 (E ) III /JJMR/ 768-0908 dated the 17th September , 2008).
Sl . No.
District
Tehsil
NameofVillage
Remarks Patwari circle number
Area (approximately) inhectares
4
1 .
Deulwada
Bhadrawati
3.59
Full
Chandrapur
Total area :-3.59 hectares (Approximately) or 8.87 acres ( Approximately) .
BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION:-
A-B: Line starts from Point ' A' in village Deulwada and passes along the common boundary of Plot number 80 and Plot number 78 and meets at Point ' B ' .
B-C: Line passes along the Plot number 80 and Plot number 77 , then passes along the Plot number 80 and Plot number 81 and meets at point ' C' .
C-D: Line passes along the boundary of Plot number 80 and Plot number 82, then passes along the Plot number 80 and Plot number 83 and meets at point ' D' .
D-A: Line passes along the Plot number 80 and Plot number 79 and meets at starting point ' A' ..
[F. No. 43015/29/2008 - PRIW - I ]
M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy .
नई दिल्ली , 19 मार्च, 2009
का.आ. 761.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है , कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में से कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है ;
अतः अब , कैन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ), अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उपैत अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ;
1390
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009 /CHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले रेखाक संसी-1 ( ई ) 111/जी.आर./769-0908 , तारीख 19 सितम्बर , 2008 का निरीक्षण वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व विभाग ) , कोल ईस्टेट , सिविल लाइन्स, नागपुर 440001 ( महाराष्ट्र ) के कार्यालय में या मुख्य महाप्रबंधक ( एक्सप्लोरेशन डिवीजन ) , केंद्रीय खान, योजना और डिजाइन संस्थान , गोंडवाना पॅलेस , काँके रोड़ , राँची के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काऊंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता के कार्यालय में या जिला कलेक्टर छिन्दवाड़ा ( मध्य प्रदेश ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ;
इस अधिसूचना के अतंर्गतं आने वाली भूमि में, हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों , चारों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन 'की तारीख से 90 दिनों के भीतर , मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, वेस्टर्न कोलफील्डस लिमिटेड , पेंच क्षेत्र, डाकघर- परासिया , तहसील परासिमा , जिला छिन्दवाड़ा ( मध्य प्रदेश ) या वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड (राजस्व विभाग ) , कोल ईस्टेट , सिविल लाइन्स, नागपुर-440001 ( महाराष्ट्र ) को भेजेंगे ।
अनुसूची
मगरई ब्लॉक
पेंच क्षेत्र
जिला छिन्दवाड़ा ( मध्य प्रदेश )
[रेखांक सं. सी-1 ( ई ) III/जी.आर./769-0908 , तारीख 19 सितम्बर , 2009 ]
ग्राम का नाम
क्रम संख्या
पटवारी सर्कल संख्या
सेटलमेंट संख्या
66
1.
24 उर्धन
2.
66
192 जमुनिया
3.
67
बगबरडिया
369 4.
कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या
बर्सड़या आरक्षित वन
ब्लॉक संख्या 39
699, 703(क) , 703(ग)
सीमा वर्णन:-
जिला
तहसील
टिप्पणी
क्षेत्रफल हेक्टर में
परासिया
284.671
भाग छिन्दवाड़ा
भाग परासिया
20.650
छिन्दवाड़ा
परासिया
182.108
भाग छिन्दवाड़ा
परासिया
भाग
113.311
छिन्दवाड़ा
कुल क्षेत्र :-600.740 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 1484,46 एकड़ ( लगभग )
क-ख : रेखा , ग्राम बरड़िया में बिन्दु " क " से आरंभ होती है और ग्राम बरड़िया से होती हुई ग्राम बगरडिया और बरड़िया आरक्षित वन की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा पर बिन्दु " ख " पर मिलती है ।
ख - ग - घ : रेखा , बरड़िया आरक्षित वन से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " ग " के पास से गुजरती है फिर बरड़िया आरक्षित वन और ग्राम जमुनिया की सम्मिलित सीमा को पार करती है और उर्धन ओपन कास्ट प्रोजेक्ट की सीमा पर बिन्दु " घ " पर मिलती है । घ-ङ- च : रेखा, ग्राम जमुनिया में उर्धन ओपन कास्ट प्रोजेक्ट की बाह्य सीमा से गुजरती है फिर ग्राम जमुनिया और ग्राम उर्धन की बाह्य सीमा को बिन्दु " ड " के पास पार करती है फिर उर्धन ओपन कास्ट प्रोजेक्ट की बाह्य सीमा से गुजरती हुई ग्राम उर्धन और ग्राम दुमरी की बाह्य सीमा पर बिन्दु " च " पर मिलती है ।
च-छ : रेखा, ग्राम उर्धन और ग्राम टुभरी की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा से गुजरती हुई ग्रम उर्धन , ग्राम दुमरी और ग्राम झुरे की सम्मिलित तिराही ग्राम सीमा पर सीमा पर बिन्दु " छ " पर. मिलती है ।
छ-ज : रेखा, ग्राम उर्धन और ग्राम झुरे की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा से गुजरती हुई ग्राम उर्धन और ग्राम झुरे और थावनरी आरक्षित वन की तिराही सीमा पर बिन्दु " ज " पर मिलती है ।
अझ: रेखा, ग्राम उर्धन और थावनरी आरक्षित वन की सम्मिलित सीमा से गुजरती हुई ग्राम उर्धन , ग्राम बगबरडिया और थावनरी आरक्षित वन की तिराही सीमा पर बिन्दु " झ " पर मिलती है ।
घ-क : रेखा , ग्राम बगबरडिया और थावनरी आरक्षित वन की सम्मिलित सीमा से गुजरती है और ग्राम बगबरडिया तथा भावनरी आरक्षित वन की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा पर आरंभिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है ।
[सं. 43015/20/2008- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]
एम. शहाबुद्दीन, अवर सचिव 1391
भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
New Delhi , the 19th March, 2009
S.O. 761. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that Coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the locality mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein .
Theplan bearing Number C- 1 (E) III/GR/769-0908 dated 19th September, 2008 ofthe area covered by this notifica- tion can be inspected in the office of the Western Coalfields Limited (Revenue Department) , Coal Estate, Civil Lines , Nagpur-440001 (Maharashtra ) or at the office of the Chief General Manager (Exploration Division), Central Mine Planning andDesign Institute, Gondwana Place , Kanke Road, Ranchi or at the office of the Coal Collector , 1, Council House Street, Kolkata or at the office of the District Collector , Chhindwara (Madhya Pradesh) .
All persons interested in the lands covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , charts and other documents referred to in sub - section (7 ) of section 13 of the said Act to the office of the Chief General Manager , Western Coalfields Limited, Pench Area, Post Parasia, Tahsil Parasia, District Chhindwara (Madhya Pradesh ) or Officer on Special Duty (Land and Revenue ) , Western Coalfields Limited , Revenue Department, Coal Estate, Civil Lines , Nagpur- 440001 (Maharashtra ) within ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette .
SCHEDULE
MagraiBlock
PenchArea
District Chhindwara ( Madhya Pradesh)
(PlanNumber C- 1 ( E ) III/ GR/ 769-0908 dated the 19th September,2008).
Remarks
District
Tahsil
Sl . No. Name ofVillage
Area in hectares
Settlement number
Patwari circle number
Part
284.671
Parasia Chhindwara
24
66
1.
Urdhan
Part
20.650
Chhindwara
Parasia
66
-192
Jamunia
2.
182.108
Part
Chhindwara
Parasia
369
67
3.
Bagbardia
Part
Chhindwara 113.311
Parasia
BlockNo.
Bardia Reserve
4.
Compt.No.
39
Forest
699,703(A),
703(C)
Total area :-600.740 hectares (Approximately ) or 1484.46 acres ( Approximately)
BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION :-
A-B : Line starts from Point ' A' in village Bagbardia and passes through village Bagbardia and meets on common boundary ofvillage Bagbardia and Bardia Reserve Forest at Point ' B ' .
B-C-D: Line passes through Bardia Reserve Forest and passes nearby Point ' B ' in Bardia Reserve Forest and crosses common boundary of Bardia Reserve Forest and village Jumunia and passes through village Jumunia and meets on out boundary of Urdhan Opencast Project at point 'D' .
D-E-F : Line passes along the outer boundary of Urdhan Opencast Project in village Jumunia, then crosses common village boundary of villages Jamunia and Urdhan at Point ' E' . Then passes along the outer boundary of Urdhan Opencast Project in village Urdhan and meets on Common village boundary of villages Urdhan and Tumri at point ' F' .
F-G : Line passes along the common village boundary of villages Urdhan and Tumri and meets on trijunction of villages Urdha , Tumri and Jhurre at point ' G ' .
GH : Line passes along the common village boundary of villages Urdhan and Jhurre and meets on trijunction of village Urdhan , village Jhurre and Thaonari Reserve Forest at point ' H ' .
H-I : Line passes along the common boundary of village Urdhan and Thaonari Reserve Forest and meets ontrijunction ofvillage Urdhan , village Bagbardia and Thaonari Reserve Forest at point ' I' .
I-A : Line passes along the common boundary of villages Bagbardia and Thaonari Reserve Forest and meets on common boundary of villages Bagbardia and Thaonari Reserve Forest at starting point 'A' .
[No. 430 15/20/2008 - PRIW - 1 ]
M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy.
1392
i:
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART II-SEC: 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली, 20 मार्च , 2009
का.आ. 762. केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है, कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लेखित परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में से कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है;
इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले रेखांक सं. सी-1 ( ई ) III /जेजेएमआर/775-0109 , तारीख 24 जनवरी, 2009 का निरीक्षण , वेस्टर्न कोलफीड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व विभाग ) , कोल ईस्टेट, सिविल लाईन्स, नागपुर-440001 ( महाराष्ट्र ) के कार्यालय में या मुख्य महाप्रबंधक ( एक्सप्लोरेशन प्रभाग ) , केन्द्रीय खान , योजना और डिजाइन संस्थान , गोंडवाना पॅलेस , काँके रोड़ , राँची के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 , काऊंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता के कार्यालय में या जिला कलेक्टर , चंद्रपुर ( महाराष्ट्र ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है । इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाली भूमि में, हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चारों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से 90 दिनों के भीतर , मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , माजरी क्षेत्र, पोस्ट कुचना , तहसील वरोरा , जिला चंद्रपुर-442 503 ( महाराष्ट्र) या वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड , राजस्व विभाग , कोल ईस्टेट, सिविल लाईन्स , नागपुर-440 001 ( महाराष्ट्र) को भेजेंगे ।
अनुसूची
तेलवासा एक्सपेन्शन ओपनकास्ट ब्लॉक
माजरी क्षेत्र
जिला चंद्रपुर ( महाराष्ट्र)
( रेखांक सं. सी-1 ( ई ) III /जेजेएमआर/ 775-0109 , तारीख 24 जनवरी , 2009 )
क्र. सं. ग्राम का नाम पटवारी सर्कल संख्या तहसील
जिला
क्षेत्रफल हेक्टर में टिप्पणी 1
तेलवासा
28
भद्रावती
21.00
भाग
चंद्रपुर
कुल क्षेत्र : 21.00 हेक्टर ( लगभग )
या
51.89 एकड़ ( लगभग ) सीमा वर्णन:-
क ख : रेखा, बिन्दु' क' से आरंभ होती है और ग्राम तेलवासा से वर्धा नदी के पूर्वी तट से बढ़ती हुई ग्राम तेलवासा से होती हुई बिन्दु ' ख ' पर मिलती है ।
ख - गः रेखा , ग्राम तेलवासा से होती हुई जाती है और नाले की बाहरी सीमा के साथ गुजरती हुई और नाला पार करके फिर ग्राम तेलवासा खंड की बाहरी सीमा से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु ' ग ' पर मिलती है ।
ग - घः रेखा, ग्राम तेलवासा से होती हुई सड़क की बाहरी सीमा से गुजरती है और बिन्दु ' घ ' पर मिलती है ।
घ - कः रेखा, ग्राम तेलवासा से होकर जाती है और ग्राम तेलवासा की बाइय सीमा और ग्राम सड़क की बाह्रय सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती है और आरंभिक बिन्दु ' क' पर मिलती है ।
[फा. स. 43015/7/2009-पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]
एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 20th March, 2009
S.O. 762. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that Coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the locality mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed;
1393 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquistion and Development) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957) , (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein;
Theplanbearing number C- 1 (E ) III/ JJMR/775-0109 dated the 24th January, 2009 of the area covered by this notification can be inspected in the office of the Western Coalfields Limited ( Revenue Department) , Coal Estate, Civil Lines , Nagpur -440001 ( Maharashtra ) or at the office ofthe Chief General Manager (Exploration Division), Central Mine Planning and Design Institute, Gondwana Place , Kanke Road, Ranchi or at the office of the Coal Collector , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata orat the office of the District Collector Chhindwara (Madhya Pradesh) .
All persons interseted in the lands covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , charts and other documents referred to in sub- section (7) of Section 13 ofthe said Act to the office of the Chief General Manager Western Coalfields Limited, Majri Area, Post Kuchna Tahsil Warora, District Chandrapur- 442503 (Maharashtra ) of Officer on Special Duty (Land and Revenue) , Western Coalfields Limited, Revenue Department, Coal Estate , Civil Lines , Nagpur -440001 (Maharashtra) withinninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette .
SCHEDULE
Telwasa Expansion OC Block Majri Area
District Chandrapur ( Maharashtra )
(Plan number C - 1 (E ) III/ JJMR/775-0109 dated 24th January , 2009)
Tahsil
Remarks
District
Area in Hectares Patwari circle No.
Sl. Name ofVillage
28
1.
Telwasa
Bhadrawati
21.00
Part
Chandrapur
Total area: 21.00 hectares (approximately)
or 51.89 acres ( approximately) Boundary description :
A-B: Line starts from Point ' A' through village Telwasa along the eastern bank of Wardha River ofvillage Telwasa and meets at Point ' B' ,
B-C: Line passes through village Telwasa and proceeds along the outer boundary of Nallah and then crosses Nallah thenproceeds along the outer boundary of Telwasa Block and meets at Point ' C ' ,
C-D: Line passes through village Telwasa along with the outer boundary of village road and meets at Point 'D' , D-A: Line passes through village Telwasa and proceeds along the outer boundary of Telwasa village and outer boundary ofvillage road and meets at starting Point 'A' .
[F. No. 43015/7/2009/PRIW - I ] M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 23 मार्च , 2009
का.आ. 763, केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है , कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जानें की संभावना है ;
अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम 1957 ( 1957 का 20. ) ( जिसे इसमें पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उसमें कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ;
इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले रेखांक सं. एम.सी./एम.पी./08/03 तारीख 11 सितम्बर , 2008 का निरीक्षण प्रखंड भूमि और भूमि सुधार कार्यालय , सालानपुर , थाना सालानपुर , जिला बर्दवान ( पश्चिम बंगाल ) के कार्यालय में या मुख्य महाप्रबंधक ( अन्वेषण खंड ) , सेन्ट्रल माइन प्लानिंग एण्ड डिजाइन इन्स्टीच्यूट लिमिटेड , गोन्दवाना प्लेस, काँके रोड, राँची या कोयला नियंत्रक 1 , काउंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता या कलेक्टर, बर्दवान ( पश्चिम बंगाल ) या ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड का मुख्यालय , संक्टोरिया, डाकघर डिशेरगढ़ , जिला- बर्दवान ( पश्चिम बंगाल ) , पिन-713333 के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ;
इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाली भूमि में , हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शे, चार्ट और अन्य दस्तावेज को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से 90 दिनों के भीतर महाप्रबंधक मुख्य महाप्रबंधक के, सालानपुर क्षेत्र , डाकघर लालगंज , जिला बर्दवान ( पश्चिम बंगाल ) पिन-713359 को भेजेंगे । 1394
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7 , 1931
[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
अनुसूची
मोहनपुर (विस्तार ) ओ. सी. पी. कोयला खनम ब्लाक
जिला-बर्दवान ( पश्चिम बंगाल )
योजना संख्या : एमसी/एसपी /08/03
तारीख 11 सितम्बर , 2008
टिप्पणी
ग्राम संख्याक
जिला
क्र. सं.
मौजा/ग्राम
थाना
क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में)
क्षेत्रफल ( एकड़ में )
61.28
24.80
बर्दवान
1
जे. एल. सं. 64
पहाड़गोड़ा सालानपुर
योग
61.28 एकड़ (लगभग)
24.80 हेक्टेयर (लगभग)
सीमा वर्णन: -
क से ख : रेखा मोहनपुर मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 65 की प्लाट संख्या 123 एवं पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट सं. 604 की संयुक्त परिसीमा से प्रारम्भ होकर एवं पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा, जे . एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 604 , 605, 606 , 446 , 444 , 443 , 440, 438 , 433, 396, 397 , 398 , 390 से होते हुए पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 362 में बिन्दु ख से मिलती है । ख से ग : रेखा पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 362 से प्रारंभ होते हुए पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट सं. 350 को पार करते हुए पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा जे. एल . सं. 64 की प्लाट सं. 351 में बिन्दु ग से मिलती है ।
ग से घ : रेखा पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट सं. 351 से प्रारंभ होकर पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट सं. 253 ( कच्चा रास्ता ) से पार करते हुए पहाड़गोड़ा मौज़ा , जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 254 , 251 , 249 ( परित्यक्त रेलवे लाईन ) , 248 , 497 से होते हुए पहाड़गीड़ा मौजा , जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 497 में बिन्दु घ से मिलती है ।
घ से ङ : रेखा पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लांट संख्या 497 से प्रारंभ होकर पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा , जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 498 में बिन्दु ङ से मिलती है ।
ङ से च : रेखा पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा , जे . एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 498 से प्रारंभ होते हुए पहाड़गांड़ा मौजा , जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 496 ( तालाब ) की उत्तर से गुजरते हुए इसी प्लाट के पूर्व में बिन्दु च से मिलती है ।
च से छ : रेखा पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा , जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 496 से प्रारंभ होते हुए पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा , जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या. 494 के उत्तर - पश्चिम से गुजरते हुए पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 538 , 537 को पार करता हुआ पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा , जे . एल. सं . 64 की प्लाट संख्या 540 की दक्षिण परिसीमा को स्पर्श करता हुआ एवं पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 541 को पार करके पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा , जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 542 में बिन्दु छ से मिलती है ।
छ. से ज: रेखा पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा, जे. एल . सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 542 से प्रारंभ होते हुए पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा , जे . एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या. 543 को पार करके पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 494 के उत्तर - पूर्व में बिन्दु ज से मिलती है ।
जसेझ : रेखा पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा , जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 494 के उत्तर - पूर्व से प्रारंभ होकर पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा , जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 494 और मोहनपुर मौजा जे. एल. सं. 65 की प्लाट सं. 8 के संयुक्त परिसीमा पर बिन्दु झ से मिलती है ।.
झ से ञ : रेखा पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा, जे. एल . सं. 54 की प्लाट संख्या 494 और मोहनपुर मौजा जे. एल. सं. 65 की प्लाट संख्या 8,9 और 10 की संयुक्त परिसीमा से प्रांरभ होकर संयुक्त परिसीमा पर बिन्दु ज से मिलती है ।
ज से ट : रेखा पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा , जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 494 और मोहनपुर मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 65 की प्लाट संख्या 113 के संयुक्त परिसीमा से प्रारम्भ होकर इसी संयुक्त परिसीमा पर बिन्दु ट से मिलती है ।
टसेठ : रेखा पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा , जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 494 और मोहनपुर मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 65 की प्लाट संख्या 113 और 114 के संयुक्त परिसीमा से प्रारंभ होकर इसी संयुक्त परिसीमा पर बिन्दु ठ से मिलती है ।
ठ से ड : रेखा पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 493 ( परित्यक्त रेलवे लाईन ) के उत्तर - पूर्व और मोहनपुर मौजा, जं. एल. सं. 65 की प्लाट संख्या 112 के संयुक्त परिसीमा से प्रारम्भ होकर इसी संयुक्त परिसीमा पर बिन्दु ड से मिलती है । 1395 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931.
डं से ढ : रेखा पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 493 के दक्षिण- पूर्व और मोहनपुर मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 65 की प्लाट संख्या 112 के दक्षिण - पश्चिम से प्रारंभ होकर पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा , जे . एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 580 , 582 और मौहनपुर मौजा , जे. एल. सं. 65 की प्लाट संख्या 119 के संयुक्त परिसीमा पर बिन्दु ढ से मिलती है ।
ढसे ण : रेखा पहाड़गीड़ा मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 581 और मोहनपुर मौजा , जे. एल. सं. 65 की प्लाट संख्या 119 के संयुक्त परिसीमा से प्रारम्भ होकर इसी संयुक्त परिसीमा पर बिन्दु ण से मिलती है ।
ण से त : रेखा पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 581 और मोहनपुर मौजा , जे. एल. सं. 65 की प्लाट संख्या 119 के संयुक्त परिसीमा से प्रारम्भ होकर इसी संयुक्त परिसीमा पर बिन्दु त से मिलती है ।
तसे थ: रेखा पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 603 और मोहनपुर मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 65.की प्लाट संख्या 119 के संयुक्त परिसीमा से प्रारम्भ होकर इसी संयुक्त परिसीमा पर बिन्दु थ से मिलती है ।
थ सेक़: रेखा पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा , जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 603 और मोहनपुर मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 65 की प्लाट संख्या 121 की संयुक्त परिसीमा से प्रारम्भ होते हुए पहाड़गोड़ा मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 64 की प्लाट संख्या 604 और मोहनपुर मौजा, जे. एल. सं. 65 की प्लाट संख्या 123 की संयुक्त परिसीमा पर प्रारंभिक मूल बिन्दु क से मिलती है ।
[फा. सं. 43015/28/2008--पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]
एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 23rd March, 2009
S.O. 763. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the locality mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisitions and Development) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein;
The Plan bearing number MC/ MP/ 08 / 03 dated 11th September , 2008 of the area covered by this notification can be inspected in the office of the Block Land & Land Reforms Office , Salanpur , Police Station Salanpur , District Burdwan (WestBengal) or at the office of Chief General Manager (Exploration Division) , Central Mine Planning and Design Institute, Gondwana Place , Kanke Road, Ranchi or at the office ofthe Coal Controller , I Council House Street, Kolkata or at the office ofthe District Collector , Burdwan ( West Bengal) or at the headquarters of M/ s . Eastern Coalfields Limited , Sanctoria, Post Office Dishergarh, District Burdwan (West Bengal), PIN Code 713333 .
All persons interested in the land covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , charts and other documents referred in sub- section (7) of Section 13 of the said Act to the General Manager/Chief General Managers , Salanpur Area, Post Office Lalganj , District Burdwan ( West Bengal) , PIN Code 713359 within ninety days from the date of. publication ofthis notification in the Official Gazette:
SCHEDULE
MOHANPUR (EXPANSION ) OCP Coal Mining Block
DistrictBurdwan (West Bengal)
Plan number: MC/MP/08/03 dated 11th September, 2008
District
Remarks Thana
Mouja/Village
Village Number
SL No.
Area( in acres approximately)
Area (inhectares approximately )
24.80
61.28
Burdwan
J. L. No.
Salanpur
1. Pahargora
64
Total area 24.80 (hectares approximately)
61.28 (acres approximately)
Boundary Description:
A-B: Line starts from common boundary of plot number 123 of Mohanpur Mouza, J.L. number 65 and plot No. 604 of Pahargora Mouza, J.L. number 64 and crosses through plot number 604, 605, 606, 446, 444, 443, 440, 438 , 433, 396, 397, 398, 390 and meets at point B in Plot number 362.
992G1/09-4 1396
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii) ] B-C: Line starts from plot number 362 of Pahargora Mouza, J.L. number 64 and crosses through plot number 350 of Pahargora Mouza, J.L. number64 and meets at point C in plot number 351 of Pahargora Mouza , J.L. number 64 .
C-D: Line starts from plot number 351 of Pahargora Mouza, J.L. number 64 and passes through plot number 253 (Kacha Road) , 254 , 251 , 249 (Abandoned Railway Line ) , 248, 497 ofPahargora Mouza, J.L. number 64 and meets at point D in north ofplot number 497 of Pahargora Mouza , J.L. number 64 .
D-E: Line starts from plot number 497 of Pahargora Mouza, J.L. number 64 and meets at point E in plot number 498 of Pahargora Mouza, J.L. number 64.
E-F: Line starts from plot number 498 of Pahargora Mouza, J.L. number 64 and meets at point F in North ofplot No. 496 (Pond) Pahargora Mouza, J.L. number64.
F-G: Line starts from plot number 496 of Pahargora Mouza, J.L. number 64 and passes through North- West of plot number 494, 538, 537 of Pahargora Mouza, J.L. number 64 then touching South boundary of plot number 540 of Pahargora Mouza, J.L. number 64 and passes through plot number 541 of Pahargora Mouza, J.L. number 64 and meets at point G in plot number 542 of Pahargora Mouza, J.L. number 64.
G-H: Line starts from plot number 542 of Pahargora Mouza , J.L. number 64 and passes through plot No. 543 and meets atpoint H in North-East of plot number 494 of Pahargora Mouza, J.L. number 64.
H-1: Line starts and passes through North -East of plot number 494 of Pahargora Mouza , J.L. number 64 and meets at point 1 on common boundary between plot number 494 ofPahargora Mouza , J.L. number 64 and plot number 8 of MohanpurMouza, J.L. number 65 .
I-J : Line starts and passes through common boundary between plot number 494 of Pahargora Mouza, J.L. number 64 and plot numbet 8 , 9 and 10 of Mohanpur Mouza, J.L. number 65 and meets at point J.
J-K: Line starts and passes through common boundary between plot number 494 of Pahargora Mouza , J.L. number 64 and plot number 113 of Mohanpur Mouza, J.L. number 65 and meets at point K.
K-L: Line starts andpasses through common boundary of plöt humber 494 of Pahargora Mouza , J.L. number 64 and plot number 113 and 114 of Mohanpur Mouza . J.L. number 65 and meets at point L.
L-M: Line starts from common boundary between East- North ofplot number 493 (Abandoned Railway Line ) and plot number 112 of Mohanpur Mouza, J.L. number 65 and passes through common boundary of plot number 493 ofPahargora Mouza, J.L. number 64 and plot number 112 of Mohanpur Mouza , J.L. number 65 and meets at pointM.
M-N: Line starts form common boundary between South -East of plot number 493 of Pahargora Mouza, J.L. number 64 and South - West of plot number 112 of Mohanpur Mouza, J.L. number 65 and passes through common boundary between plot number 580, 582 of Pahargora Mouza, J.L. number 64 and plot number 119 of Mohanpur Mouza , J.L. number 65 and meets at point N.
N-O: Line starts and passes through common boundary between plot number 581 of Pahargora Mouza , J.L. number 64 and plot number 119 of Mohanpur Mouza, J.L. number 65 and meets a point O.
O-P: Line starts and passes through common boundary between plot number 581 of Pahargora Mouza , J.L. number 64 and piot number 119 of Mohanpur Mouza , J.L. number 65 and meets at point P.
P-Q: Line starts and passes through common boundary between plot number 603 of Pahargora Mouza , J.L. number 64 and 119 of Mohanpur Mouza, J.L. number 65 and meets at point Q.
Q-A: Line starts and passes through common boundary between plot number 603 of Pahargora Mouza, J.L. number 64 and plot number 121 of Mohanpur Mouza, J.L. number 65 and meets at starting point A on common boundary between plot number 604 of Pahargora Mouza , J.L. number 64 and plot number 123 of Mohanpur Mouza, J.L. number 65 . t
[F. No. 43015/28/2008 /PRIW - 1 ]
M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy .
1397 [भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
पेट्रोलिम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 16 मार्च, 2009
का.आ. 764.- भारत सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि राजस्थान राज्य में सेमकोर टर्मिनल ( नया नोहरा ) पाइपलाईन परियोजना के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा , एक पाइपलाईन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;
और भारत सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाईन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाईन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलन अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अतः अब, भारत सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाईन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धास 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध कर दी जाती , हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाईन बिछाएं जाने के संबंध में , श्री एस. सी. जैन , सक्षम प्राधिकारी, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड, गेल विहार , सैक्टर-6 , विद्याधर नगर, जयपुर , राजस्थान को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
तहसील
गांव
सर्वे नं.
जिला
आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल (हैक्टेयर में)
1
2
3
4
5
कोटा
0.0800
नया नोहरा
84
लाडपुरा
84/5
0.0800
84/4
0.1100
0.0280
85/2
85/1
0.0300
85
0.0270
86
0.0060
0.0260
87
77
0.0330
0.4200
[फाईल सं. एल-14014/34/08-जी.पी. ]
के.के. शर्मा , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi , the 16th March, 2009
S.O 764. Whereas it appears to Government of India that it is necessary in the public interest that for transportation of natural gas through Samcore Terminal (Naya Nohra) Pipeline Project in the State of Rajasthan, a pipeline should be laid by GAIL( India) Limited;
And, whereas it appears to Government of India that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 ofthe Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquire the Right of User therein;
Anyperson interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section ( 1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri S.C. Jain , Competent Authority, GAIL ( India) Limited , GAIL Training Institute , Sector - 6 , Vidhyadhar Nagar , Jaipur , Rajasthan .
1398
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/ CHAITRA 7 , 1931
Tehsil
District
Village 1
2
3
Kota
Ladhpura
NayaNohra
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]
SCHEDULE
Survey No.
Area to be acquired for ROU (in Hectares)
4
5
84
0.0800
84/5
0.0800
84/4
0.1100
85/2
0.0280
85/1
0.0300
85
0.0270
86
0.0060
87
0.0260
0.0330
0.4200
[F. No. L- 14014/34/08-G.P. ]
K. K. SHARMA , Under Secy
नई दिल्ली , 16 मार्च, 2009
कां.आ. 765. भारत सरकार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाईन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962का 50 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण में पंजाब राज्य में मैसर्स गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाईन बिछाने के लिये उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन संलग्न सूची के कालम ( 1 ) में वर्णित व्यक्ति को सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का पालन करने के लिये नियुक्त करती है । व्यक्ति का नाम और पता
1
श्री मनदीप सिंह ढिलोन
तहसीलदार
मैसर्स गेल ( इण्डिया) लिमिटेड में, मानदेय के आधार पर
उद्योग भवन , एनेक्स बिल्डिंग , 18 , हिमालया मार्ग , सेक्टर-17 सी, चण्डीगढ़ -160017
अनुसूची
अधिकारिता का क्षेत्र
2
सम्पूर्ण पंजाब राज्य
[फा.सं. एल-14014/3/09-जी.पी. ]
के. के. शर्मा , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 16th March, 2009
S.O. 765.--Whereas, in pursuance of clause ( a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition ofRight ofUser in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ), the Government of India hereby authorizes the person mentioned in column (1 ) ofthe Schedule given below to perform the functions of the Competent Authority in State of Punjab under the said Act for laying pipelines by the said M/s . GAIL ( India) Limited in the area mentioned in column (2 ) ofthe schedule.
Name and Address of the person
1
Shri Mandip Singh Dhillon ,
Tehsildar ,
Onhonorarium basis to
M/ s . GAIL ( India) Limited, Udyog Bhawan , Annexe Building,
18 , Himalaya Marg, Sector - 17C, Chandigarh - 160017.
SCHEDULE
Area of Jurisdiction
2
The whole State of Punjab.
[F. No. L- 14014/3/09- G.P . ]
K. K. SHARMA, Under Secy.
1399
भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]
नई दिल्ली, 25 मार्च , 2009
का. आ. 766.- केंद्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य के विरमगांम से कांडला तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑईल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , द्वारा विरमगांम -कांडला ब्रांच पाईपलाईन बिछानी जानी चाहिये ।
और, केंद्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी पाईपलाईन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए ऐसी भूमि जिसके भीतर पाईपलाईन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, के उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करना आवश्यक है ।
अतः केंद्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाईन ( भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का उपयोग करते हुए, उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।
कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची मे वर्णित भूमि से हितबद्ध है, उक्त अधिनियम , की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गयी अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलबद्ध करा दिये जाने की तारिख से इक्कीस दिनों के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन या भूमि के अंदर पाईपलाईन बिछाने के संबंध में आक्षेप , लिखित रूप में सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑईल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमीटेड , 3/122 , गुजरात रिफाइनरी टाउनशिप , पो. ऑ. जवाहरनगर , जि. वडोदरा -391 320, गुजरात , को कर सकेगा ।
अनुसूची
जिला : अहमदाबाद
राज्य : गुजसत
क्षेत्रफल
गांव का नाम
सर्वे संख्या
तहसिल का नाम
वर्ग मीटर
हेक्टेयर
एयर
1
3
4
5
6 2
विरमगांम
57
0
00
75 हांसलपुर सेरेश्वर
0
08
32
58
59
0
23
54
64
24
0
77
63
74
0
11
61
0
28
03
62
0
00
30 विरमगांम
1230
0
00
42
1229
0
41
95
1228
0
13
50
1225
0
80
09
1223
0
41
49
रोड
0
04
81 1400
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/ CHAITRA 7 , 1931
1
3
4
1204
0
1206
0
रोड
0
0
1134
1135
0
0
1133
1131
0
0
1130
1124
0
0
1123
1125
0
1122
0
1103
0
1104
0
0
1105
1099
0
1097
0
1096
0
1084
0
0
1085
1081
0
1080
0
1076+1077
0
1078
0
नहर
0
1529
0
1530
0
1074
0
नहर
0
387
0
1073
0
1072
0
वणी
218
1
रोड
0
219
0
203
0
0
रोड(रामा)
233
0
234
0
235
0 [Part II-Sec . 3 (ii )] 5
6
41
93
29
44
03
58
51
85
00
10
01
26
17
45
12
94
26
69
25
05
02
79.
00
24
31
12
35
05
32
43
05
72
37
35
00
10
24
34
17
92
08
05
14
74
15
00
63
40
04
52
07
56
19
27
27
46
-05
39
12
87
47
36
21
83
00
58
06
75
65
32
04
07
04
92
03
99
30
95
16
01 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1401
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र , 1931
1
2
3
4
0
रेल्वेलाईन
236
0
0
237
238
0
0
241
0
240
रोड
0
0
322
299
0
0
298
300
0
0
301
302
0
0
303
292
रोड
0.
382
0
0
383
0
388
0
389
0
391
0
394
0
399
0
395
0
396
0
397
रोड
0
0
कंकरावाली
201
0
200
0
198
0
197
0
194
0
195
रोड
0
वडगास
0
44:
45
0
0
46
0
50
0
56
5
6
26 06
75 05
20
72
87 01
36
38 42
71
76 04
09
21 43
07 00
67 48
39 25
54
86 66
90 25
00
10
65 03
21 02
15 20
10 00
63
38 16
51 17
37 18
81
34 13
27
68
73 19
02
45
41 13
17 04
36 58
19
74 23
99 34
98
68 02
59 .16
00
22
15 15
92 08
62 23 1402
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/ CHAITRA 7 , 1931
1
2
3
4
57
0
36
0
35
0
34
0
रोड
0
73
0
77
0
0
79
80
0
0
81
0
82
0
85
0
83
84
0
रोड
0
131
0
रोड
0
132
0
137
0
0
151
150
0
0
149
147
0
0
148
0
140
0
141
0
321
0
391
392
0
0
409
411
0
0
408
420
0
0
419
0
421
0
424
0
425
रोड
0 [Part II -Sec . 3( ii )] 5
6
00
10 24
86 05
92
20
56
42
04
00
36
01
18
03
38
13
24. 01
90
05
37
10
84
14
43
73 05
01
84
96
08
01
72 17
29 14
27 13
50 00
84
12
16
68 02
14
26 02
17 26
75 02
77
02
39
95 28
13
69 09
68
05 21
07
88 08
34 33
71 14
91 20
96
22 02 1403 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
भाग -खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
5
6
4
3
2
1
33
06
430
0
रोड
0
03
04
01
94
0
516
94
27
515
0
514
00
0 .
98
15
0
87
513
0
02
25
512
नाला
0
22
66 गोरैय्या
10
277
0
00
275
44
55
1
26
0
16
276
63
18
264
0
0
21
89
263
14
33
0
262
रोड
0
02
86
0
01
04
221
07
0
18
220
218
25
03
0
217
0
26
33
01
0
214
03
[फा. सं. आर-25011/4/2009- ओ.आर. - 1 ]
बी.के. दत्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 25th March , 2009
S.O. 766. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products from Viramgam to Kandla in the State of Gujrat, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying said pipeline it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification.
Now, therefore in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of The Petroleum and Mineral Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may within 21 days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub -section ( 1) of the section 3 of said Act , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to The Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, 3/122 , Gujarat Refinery Township , P.O. Jawaharnagar , Dist . Vadodara- 391 320 (Gujarat) .
992G1/09-5 1404
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii ) ]
SCHEDULE
District: Ahmedabad
Name of Tahsil Name ofVillage SurveyNo.
3 1
2
HANSALPUR SERESHWAR
VIRAMGAM
57
58
59
64
63
61
62
VIRAMGAM
1230
1229 /
1228
1225
1223
ROAD
1204
1206
ROAD
1134
1135
1133
1131
1130
1124
1123
1125
1122
1103
1104
1105
State: Gujarat
Area
Are
Hectare
Sq. Mtr.
5
6 4
0
75
00
32 0
08
23
0
54
24
77 0
0
11
74
28
03 0
0
00
30
42 0
00
41
95 0
13
0
50 0
09
80
0
41
49 0
81
04
0
41
93 0
44
29
58 0
03
0
51
85 0
00
10 0
26
01
17
45 0
0
12
94
26
0
69 0
05
25
0
02
79 0
24
00
0
31
12 0
35
05 0
43
32 1405:
भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र7, 1931
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4
5
6
3
2
1
05
72
0
1099
35
0
37
1097,
10
00
0
1096
34
24
0.
1084
17
0
92
1085
05
0
08
1081
74
0
14
1080
00
15
0
1076+1077
63
40
0
1078
0
04
52
CANAL
07
56
0
1529
27
0
1530
19
46
0
27
1074
39
05
0
CANAL
0
12
87
387
0
47
36
1073
21
83
0
1072
VANI
1
58
218
00
75
06
ROAD
0
32
65
219
0
07
0
04
203
92
0
04
ROAD (SH)
99
0
03
233
0
95
30
234
01
16
0
235
06
26
0
RAILWAY LINE
75
0
05
236
72
20
0
237
87
0
01
238
36
38
0
241
0
42
71
240
76
0
04,
ROAD
21
0
322
09 1406
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA:
MARCH 28, 2009/ CHAITRA . 1931
[Part II-Sec . 3(ii) ] 1
2
5
3
4
6
0
299
43
07
0
298
00
67
300
0
48
39
301
0
25
54
302
0
66
86
303
0
25
90
292
0
00
10
0
ROAD
03
65
382
0
02
21.
383
0
20
15
0
388
00
10
0
389
63
38
391
0
16
51
394
0
17
37
0
399
18
81
395
0
13
34
396
0
27
68
397
0
19
73
ROAD
0
02
45 KANKRAWALI
201
0
13
41
200
0
04
17
0
198
58
36
0
197
19
74
194
0
23
99
195
34
0
98 VADGAS
0
ROAD
02
68
44
0
16
59
45
0
00
22
46
0
15
15
50
0
08
92
56
0
23
62
57
0
00
10
0
36
24
86 1407
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
4
3
2
1
0
35
0
34
ROAD
0
73
0
77
0
0
79
0
80
81
0
0
82
0
85
0
83
0
84
0
ROAD
131
0
0
ROAD
0
132
0
137
0
151
0
150
0
149
147
0
0
148
0
140
0
141
0
321
0
391
0
392
0
409
0
411
0
408
0
420
0
419
0
421
6
5
05
92
56
20
42
04
00
36
01
18
38
03
24
13
01
90
05
37
10
84
14
43
73
05
01
84
08
96
01
72
17
29
14
27
50
13
00
84
16
12
02
68
26
14
02
17
75
26
02
77
02
39
28
95
13
69
68
60
21
05
07
88
34
08
33
71 1408
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009 CHAITRA 7, 1931
[Part II Sec . 3(ii) ]
4
5
6 1
2
3
0
14
91
424
0
425
20
96
ROAD
0
02
22
0
06
430
33
ROAD
0
03
04
0
01
516
94
515
0
27
94
0
514
98
00
!
0
513
15
87
02
512
0
25 GORAIYA
NALA
0
22
66
277
00
10
0
1
44
275
55
0
276
16
26
264
0
63
18
0
263
21
89
262
0
14
33
ROAD
0
02
86
221
0
04
01
220
0
18
07
0
218
25
03
217
0
26
33
0
214
03
01
[F. No. R-25011/4/2009- O.R. - 1 ] B.K. DATTA , UnderSecy.
नई दिल्ली, 25 मार्च, 2009
का. आ. 767.- केंद्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य के विरमगांम से कांडला तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑईल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , द्वारा विरमगांम- कांडला ब्रांच पाईपलाईन बिछानी जानी चाहिये ।
और , केंद्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी पाईपलाईन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए ऐसी भूमि जिसके भीतर पाईपलाईन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, के उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करना आवश्यक है ।
अतः केंद्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाईन ( भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का उपयोग करते हुए, उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है । 1409.
भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि से हितबद्ध है, उक्त अधिनियम, की धारा 3 की उपभारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गयी अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलबद्ध करा दिये जाने की तारिख से इक्कीस दिनों के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन या भूमि के अंदर पाईपलाईन बिछाने के संबंध में आक्षेप , लिखित रूप में सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑईल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमीटेड , 3/122 , गुजरात रिफाइनरी टाउनशिप, पो. ऑ. जवाहरनगर, जि. वडोदरा -391 320 , गुजरात , को कर सकेगा ।
अनुसूची जिला : कच्छ
राज्य : गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
सर्वे संख्या
गांव का नाम
तहसिल का नाम
हेक्टेयर
4
3
2
1
1
वर्ग मीटर एयर
6
5
26
36
खुली जगह
भचाऊ
शिकारपूर
0
218
0
110/1
0
106
0
109/2
0
109/1
0
112
0
113
0
114/1
0
114/2
0
111
0
124
0
125/2
0
125/1
0
126/2
0
126/1
0
127/2
0
127/1
0
129
0
130/1
0
130/2
0
131
0
40
41
70.
22
51
01
17
13
05
04
14
25
21
80
95
14.
00
10
74
00
80
41
10
10
60
19
28
60
02
55
40
15
75
16
40
15
26
75
10
00
60
29
25
06
खुली जगह
0
133
0
196
0
195/1
30
05
15
17
61
90 1410
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7 , 1931
1
2
4
3
0
136
0
195/2
0
194
0
187
रोड
0
0
141
0
[Part Il-Sec . 3 (ii )] 5
6
12
00
12
00
41
70
36
30
81
18
00
15
42
85
खुली जगह
0
143/2
रोड
0
0
826
0
827
0
167/3
0
167/2
0
167/1
0
166
रोड
0
0 02
16
06
30
20
35
00
30
13
20
13
90
17
05
19
25
09
64
06
15
खुर्ली जगह
0
153
0
157
0
154/2
0
155
0
158/1
0 15
38
90
95
07
90
00
25
16
20
45
51
खुली जगह
0
835
0
868/52
रेल्वे
0
0
868/96
0 21
30
18
70
09
61
11
03
76
10
खुली जगह
रोड
0
0
3
0
9/1
9/2
0-
0
10
0
868/98
0 04
38
38
98
12
25
20
10
16
75
00
15
00
80
खुली जगह
0
16
0
17
0
13
38
20
01
18
20
00 1411
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
2
4 1
3
0
15
0
14
0
19
0
22/3
0
21/2
0
22/1
0
23/2
0
21/1
0
35/3
रोड
0
0
35/2
0
34/1
0
34/2
0
36
0
32/2
0
31/2
0
31/1
0
29/1
0
28/1
0
27/2
वांधिया
0
410
0
423/2
0
411
0
422/2
0
421/2
0
421/1
0
420
0
428
0
429
0
438/1
0
438/2
0
433
0
432/2
0
435/1
रोड
0 99201/09-6
5
6
32
95
20
19
01
48
90
20
26
90
17
23
16
80
11
75
05
54
07
85
34
80
07
16
18
90
02
17
28
40
17
50
13
50
29
80
07
39
00
10
35
35
03
97
11.
43
17
88
14
05
12
71
16
46
09
51
31
74
00
27
17
96
33
70
10
10
15
51
82
02 1412
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7 , 1931
1
2
4
3
0
572/2
0
572/1
0
571
0
570
0
569/1
0
554
0
556
0
558/6
0
558/4
0
558/5
0
559/2
0
559/1
0
[Part II-Sec. 3(ii)] 5
6
09
23
01
47
25
50
23
15
11
80
16
06
15
63
14
62
07
56
22
30
01
40
31
90
17
30
1336/18
रोड
0
0
515/1
0
515/2
0
514/4
0
513/3
0
513/1
रोड
0
0
511/2
0
511/1
0
510
रोड
0
0
490/2
0
492/2
0
494
0
493
रोड
0
0
709/3
0
710/1
0
710/4
0
710/2
रोड
0
0
712/6 05
01
01
11
17
75
15
49
23
15
10
68
04
03
08
51
14
90
19
80
74
05
03
35
35
19
08
80
27
29
03
84
00
10
32
01
08
22
07
11
03
23
13
13 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1
2
4
3
0
718
0
717/1
0
720
0
723
0
722/4
0
725/2
0
722/3
0
722/2
0
728/2
0
728/1
रोड
0
0
793/1
0
791/3
0
791/4
0
791/1
0
790/2
0
789/2
0
784/1
0
784/2
0
781/3
0
783
0
782/2
रोड
0
0
771
रोड
0
0
जुना कटारिया
940
0
939
0
खुली जगह
0
936
0
937
0
934
0
933
0
932
1413 5
6
10
48
22
38
75
19
13
65
28
60
00
10
05
09
00
10
07
09
12
35
04
69
00
25
16
95
17
20
09
14
14
50
32
40
29
45
04
99
04
52
34
98
23
26
04
08
75
23
03
98
28-
07
39
90
33
20
00
10
08
90
40
18
40
29
30
60 1414
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/CHAITRA 7 , 1931
1
4
2
3
0
925
रोड
0
0
924/2
0
924/1
नवा कटारिया
0
55
0
57/2
0
57/1 .
0
56
0
रोड
0
23
0
22/1
-0
20/2
0
21
0
19
0
18/1
0
17/2
0
17/3
0
17/1
0
15/1
0
12/3
0
12/2
0
12/1
0
159/1
0
160/2
0
160/3
0
14
0
148
0
149/1
0
159/3
0
140/3
0
151
0
152
[Part II Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] 5
6
17
00
60
09
20
25
31
15
30
24
12
56
00
44
31
25
05
19
25
95
34
60
01
72
21
75
41
70
00
16
22
40
91
08
13
45
15
97
02
18
14
70
10
49
63
01
11
31
15
15
19
90
14
90
03
57
10
32
21
95
10
00
44
11 1415
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4
2
3
1
0
ललीयाना
581
0
579/1
0
578
0
615
0
608
0
609
0
610
0、
607
रोड
0
0
15
0
18
0
17
0
57
0
59/2
0
56
0
59/1
0
60
0
61
रोड
0
0
94
0
93
0
91/2
0
92/2
0
89
0
88
रोड
0
0
122
0
121
0
120
0
123
0
124
0
125
6
5
31
95
07
27
31
45
12
09
01
30
54
19
20
26
21
77
63
04
46
38
16
28
35
69
05
30
09
29. 08
42
01
63
74
19
23
24
04
64
35
93
35
26
18
92
21
07
05
26
30
64
02
22
23
47
31
18
10
00
00
10
26
15
10
00 1416
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[Part II-Sec. 3( ii) ] 1
2
4
3
5
6
रोहे
0
04
78
0
27
32
145/1
0
26
01
144
0
24
69
147
रोड
0
06
52
0
52
04
148/1
0
23
57
152/1
0
63
27
153
0
54
46.
165
0
17
59
156
0
25
.89
157
0
14
57
158
समाखियाली
0
03
98
499
0
30
96
498
रोड
0
03
65
0
02
99
496
0
42
43
497
रोड
0
03
13
0
18
95
458
0
67
75
459
0
00
10
456
रोड
0
05
64
0
39
17
407
0
03
11
406
रोड
0
03
88
0
20
05
395/1
0
21
40
394
0
33
45
396
0
02
398
57
0
28
63
397
छडवाडा
0
63
84
299
0
32
20
308
attested filternatemandadi mind witionsrelate test. person deps . thato .. tutt- [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
1417
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
1
2
4
3
0
307
0
306
0
312
0
313
रोड
0
0
362
0
361
0
363
0
364
0
357
0
356
0
354
0
353/3
रोड
0
0
420/1
0
419
0
418
0
423
0
417/1
0
425/1
0
425/2
0
426
0
427
0
6
5
11
63
19
10
24
60
07
32
10
60
20.
80
21
30
23
02
16
04
38
40
12
76
34
40
21
36
02
68
08
27
18
40
26
20
00
10
20
80
27
13
00
51
38
26
14
29
32
27
खुली जगह
0
470.
0
460
रोड
0
0
461
0
516
0
512
0
514
0
513
0
558
84
19
19
84
36
55
37
19
24
77
56
80
49
02
10
20
01
09 1418
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[Part II Sec . 3 (ii)] 1
2
3
5
6
4
0
43
73
557
0
32
25
556
0
43
65
555
00
0
10
566
0
23
52
567
रोड
0.
33
04
0
29
50
826
0 .
56
66
827
[फ्र. सं. आर-25011/6/2009-ओ.आर. - 1 ]
बी.के. दत्ता, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 25th March , 2009
S. O. 767. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products from Viramgam to Kandla in the State of Gujrat, a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying said pipeline it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification.
Now, therefore in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1 ) of section 3 of The Petroleum and Mineral Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may within 21 days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub -section ( 1 ) of the section 3 of said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to The Competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited, 3/122 , Gujarat Refinery Township , P.O. Jawaharnagar , Dist . Vadodara- 391 320 (Gujarat) .
1419
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[ भाग II- अष्ट 3( ii) ]
SCHEDULE
State:Gujarat District :Kuệch
Area
Name ofTahsil Name of Villege SurveyNo.
Are
Sq. fir
Hectare
6 2
4
3
5
1.
SHIKARPUR
SHACHAU
1
26
OPEN LAND
36
0
40
41
218
0
22
70
110/1
01
0.
51
106
0
13
17
109/2
04
0
05
109/1
0
14
25
112
0
21
80
113
14
0
114/1
00
0
10
114/2
0
00
74
111
0
41.
80
124
0
10
10
125/2
0
19
125/1
60
0
28
126/2
60
0
02
55
126/1
0
15
40
127/2
0
16
75
127/1
0
15
40
129
0
26
75
130/1
10
0
00
130/2
29
60
0
131
0
06
25
OPEN LAND
30
0
05
133
0
17
15
198
0
61
90
195/1
00
0
12
136
0
12
00
195/2
99231/09-7 1420
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 200MCHAITRA 7, 1931
1
2
4
0
194
0
187
0
ROAD
0 [Part II Sec . 3( ii )] 5
6
41
70 18
81
16 42
OPEN LAND
1432
0
ROAD
0
836
0
827
0
187/3
0
147/2
0
147/1
0
186
0
ROAD
0
85
02
06
30
20
35 00
30
13
20
13
90
17
05
19
25
09
64
06
OPEN LAND
0
163
0
157
0
154/2
0
166
0
156/1
0
15
15
38
95
90
07
90
00
25
16
20
45
OREN LAND
0
0
80052
0
51
21
30
18
70
09
RAILWAY
0
0
61.
11
03
76
OREN- LAND
0
ROAD
0
0
9/1
0
9/2
0
10.
0
0
10
04
38
38
98
12
25
20
10
16
75
00
15
00
OPENLAND
80 :
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931 [ भाग -3( ii) ]
4
3
2
0
16
0
17
0
13
0
15
0
14
0
19
0
22/3
0
21/2
0
22/1
0
23/2
0
21/1
0
35/3
0
ROAD
0
35/2
0
34/1
0
34/2
0
36
0
32/2
0
31/2
0
31/1
0
29/1
0
28/1
0
27/2
VANDHIYA
0
410
0
423/2
0
411
0
422/2
0
421/2
0
421/1
0
420
0
428
0
429
0
438/1
1421 5
20
38
18 01
20 00
32
95 19
20 01
48
90 20
26
90 17
23
80 16
11
75 05
54
85 07
80 34
07
16 18
90 02
17
40 28
50 17
13
50 29
80
39 07
10 00
35
35
97 03
11
43 17
88
05 14
12
71 16
46 09
51
74 31
27 00 1422
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/ CHAITRA 7, 1931
1
2
3
438/2
0
433
0
432/2
0
435/1
0
ROAD
0
572/2
0
572/1
0
571
0
570
0
500/1
0
554
0
556
0
558/5
0
558/4
0
558/5
0
550/2
0
550/1
0
[Part II Sec.3(ii) 17
96 33
70 10
10 15
51 02
82
23 09
01
47 25
50 23
15 11
80 16
06 15
63 14
62 07
56 22
30 01
40 31
90 : 17
30
1336/18
0
ROAD
0
515/1
0
515/2
0
514/4
0
513/3
0
513/1.
0
ROAD
0
511/2
0
511/1
0
510
0
ROAD
0
490/2
0
492/2
0
494
0
493
05
01
01
11
17
75
15
49
23
15
10
68
04
03
08
51
14
90
19
80
05
74
03
35
19
35
08
80
27
29 [ (ii)]
भारत का राजपत्र: भार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
4
2
3
0
ROAD
0
709/3
0
710/1
0
710/4
0
710/2
0
ROAD
0
712/6
0
718
0
717/1
0.
720
0
723
722/4
0
0
725/2
0
722/3
0
722/2
0
728/2
0
728/1
0
ROAD
0
793/1
0
791/3
0
791/4
0
791/1
0
790/2
0
789/2
0
784/1
0
784/2
0
781/3
0
783
0
782/2
0
ROAD
0
771
0
ROAD JUNA KATARIYA
0
940
1428 03
84
10 00
32
01
22
08
07
11
23 03
13
13 10
48 22
38
75 19
13.
65 28
60
10 00
05
09. 00
10
07 60
35 12
04
69 00
25 16
95 17
20 14
09 14
50 32.
40
45 29
04
99 04
52 34
98 23
26 04
08 23
75 03
98
07 28
10 1424
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA MARCH-2A 2000MCHAITRA 9, 1931
2
4
0
0
OPEN GAND
0
0
0
0
0
0
925
0
ROAD
0
9312
0 NAVA KATARIYA
0
95
0
57/2
0
57/1
0
56
0
ROAD
0
23.
0
22/1
0
2012
0
21
0
19
0
18/1
10
17/2
0
17/0
0
174
0
154
0
12/3
0
12/3
0
12/1
0
160M
0
150/2
0
160/3
0
14
[PartH-8cc. 3661) 5
6
39
90 33
20 00
10 08
90 18
40 29
40. 30
60 00
17 09
80 20
25 15
31
24
30 12
56 00
44
31
25
19
05
25
95 34
60 01
72
21
75
41
70
00
16
22
40
08
91
13
45
15
97
02
18
14
70
10
49
01
63
11
31
15
15
19
90 भारत का समपत्र : भार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
4
3
0
148
0
149/1
0
159/3
0
149/3
0
151
0
152
LALIYANA
0
581
0
579/1
0
578
0
615
0
608
0
600
0
610
0
607
0
ROAD
0
15
0
18
0
17
0
57
0
50/2
0
56
0
59/1
0
60
0
61
0
ROAD
0
94
0
93
0
91/2
0
92/2
0
89
0
68
0
ROAD
0
122
25 5
14
90
03
57
32
10
21
95
00
10
11
44
31
95
07
27.
31
45
12
09
01
30
19
54
20
26
21
77
04
63
46
38
16
28
35 69
30
05
09
29
08
42
63
01
74
19
23
24
04
64
35
93
26
35
18
92
07
21
26
05
30
64
22
02
47
23 1426
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 200MCHAITRA 7, 1931
1
0
121
0
120
0
123
0
124
0
125
0
ROAD
0
145/1
0
144
0
147
0
ROAD
0
148/1
0
158/1
0
188
0
106
0
150
0
187
0
196
SAMAKHIYALI
0
400
0
498
0
ROAD
406
0
0
ROAD
0
458
0
400
0
406
0
ROAD
0
407-
0
406
0
ROAD
0
396/1
0
304
0 [PartH-Sec . 3(ii)] 18
31
10
00 00
10 26
15 00
10
04
78 27
32
26
01
24
69
06
52
52
04
23
57
63
27
54
46
17
59
25
89
14
57
03
96
30
96
03
65
02
99
42
43
03
13
18
95
67
75
00
10
05
64
39
17
03
11.
03
88
20
05
21
40
33
45 [ Ⅱ- 3(ii)]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
4
3
2
0
398
0
397
CHHADWADA
0
299
0
308
0
307
0
306
0
312
0
313
0
ROAD
0
362
0
361
0
363
0
364
0
357
0
356
0
354
0
353/3
0
ROAD
0
420/1
0
419
0
418
0
423
0
417/1
0
425/1
0
425/2
0
426
0
427
0
OPEN LAND
0
470
0
460
0
ROAD
0
481
0
516
9620409-8
142 02
57 28
63
84 63
32
20 11
63
10 19
24
60 07
32 10 60 20
80 21
30 23
02 18
04 38
40
12
76 34
405 21
36 02
27 08
18
40
26
20 00
10 20
80 27
13 00
38
25 14
29 32
27 19
84 19
84 38
55
37 19
24
77 1428
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009 CHAITRA 7 , 1931
[Past, II-Sec . 3( ii)]
2
5
1
6
0
56
80
512
02
0
49
514
0
10
20
513
01
0
09
558
43.
73
0
557
0
32-
25
556
0
43.
65
566
0
10
'00
568
0
23
52
667
0
04
33
ROAD
0
29
50
826
0
56
68
827
[F.No. R-25011 /6/2009-O.R.-1 ] B.K. DATTA, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 25 मार्च, 2009
कर. सह. 768. -- केंद्रीय संस्कार को लोकहित में यह समस्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य के विरमगांम से कांडला तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिणइन के लिए इंडियन ऑईल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , द्वारा विरमगाम -कांडला ब्रांच पाईपलाईन मिलनी जानी चाहिये ।
और , केंद्रीय सरकार को बंह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी पाईपलाईन विकाने के प्रयोजन के लिए ऐसी भूमि जिसके भीतर पाईपलाईन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, के उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करना आवश्यक है ।
अतः केंद्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाईन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जम) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का उपयोग करते हुए, उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।
कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि से शितवद्ध है, उक्त अधिनियम , की धारा 3. की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गयी अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलबद्ध करा दिये जाने की तारिख से इक्कीस दिनों के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन या भूभि के अंदर पाईपलाईन बिछाने के संबंध में आक्षेप , लिखित रूप में सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑईल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमीटेड , 3/122 , गुजरात रिफाइनरी टाउनशिप , पो.ऑ. जवाहरनगर , जि. वढोपरा -391 320 , गुजरात , को कर सकेगा । 1429 [ भाग II- खष्ठ 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र7, 1931
अनुसूची
जिला : राजकोट
राज्य : गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
गांव का नाम
तहसिल का नाम
सर्वे संख्या
हेक्टेयर
वर्ग मीटर
एवर
3
4
5
6 1
2
मालीवा
24
51
0
रोहीशाला
95
रोड
3
16
0
12
75
0
96
0
66
8
58
75
0
32
57
5
11
0
56/1
5
रोड
73
0
0
10
0
59
13
78
रोड
0
खाखरेची
24
0
23
233
0
00
50
234
09
42
0
232
29
82
0
231
0
03
26
217
0
82
44
218
07
41
0
219
0
28
97
220
23
97
221
0
0
18
57
225
87
0
32
224
रोड
0
05
36
28
40
0
183
0
12
41
187
67
48
0
188
0
42
02
189
रोड
0
27
03
0
20
09
178
0
60
41
177
0
13.
91
खुली जगह
1432
¥ 31
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 21, CH
[Part I- Si) 2
3
4
6
5
0
17
05
167
0
13
51
165
0
07
10
105
0
07
07
164
0
14
156
00
0
35
20
151 .
0
01
35
152
0
04
63
148
0
25
95
153
0
11
12
148
0
05
144
46
0
32
08
140$1
0
18
65
23
0
00
10
0
36
31
24 :
0
27
25
00
0
11
60
38
0
29
43
38
0
03
14
39
0
76
52
08
0
10
44
5$
0
11
17
50
0
11
48
66
0
11
48
11
0
05
42
97
0
45
17
39
0
44.
03
34
रोड
0
72
02
0
74
55
22
रोड
0
05
76
0
02
18
0
76
67
26
0
66
25
67
रोड
0
03
87
0
21
65
03 [भाम. सम्म3( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
2
1
4
3
0
वाधरवा
284
0
265
0
261
260
0
253
0
252
0
246
0
245
0
244
0
243
C
रोड
0.
0
271
0
272
0
273
32
रोड
0 A
0
334
0
335
0
333
0
खुली जगह
0
350
C
0
351
0
349
ली जगह
0
0
359
0
389
0
390
0
406
0
405
0
404
0
403/2
0
403/1
0
401
0
400
0
396
:
1433
6
5
27
40
22
26
11
88
07
22
18
76
15
38
17
48
23
13
21
08
00
10
04
75
19
59
14
49
26
22
05
46
07
56
10
00
10
00
05
99
39
93
00
10
33
34
79
16
64
13
44
22
00
10
00
10
29
81
27
60
11
74
17
81
01
95
21
16
00
25 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2008ATHAITRA 7, 1931
1434
1
2
3
397
0
300
0
396
खिराई
रोड
0
0
14/2
0
15
रोड
0
0
100/1
0
106
0
170
0
171/4
0
171/3
0
171/2
0
171/1
0
172
0
173
0
174
0
0..
0
4/1
0
4/2
0
43
0
3
0
2
0
1/1
रोड
0
0
82/2
0
82/1
0
0
84
0 [PartH-Sec.3(ii)] 5
6
19
90
18
07
74
40
00
20
21
42
10
00
07
60
20
49
01
37
19
40
14:
60
15
74
09
01
11
85
01
97
32
30
24
32
04
97
00
45
05
13
08
47
10
95
60
90
33
03
08
99
03
23
39
99
03
17
35
40
12
29
10
63
बुली जगह
0
88
रोड
0 00
10
04
54 1435
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7. 1931
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4
3
2
1
0
मालीया
649
0
647
0
नाला
0
646
0
651
0
652
0
654
0
655
0
रोड
0
665
0
664
0
669
0
नाला
0
816
0
817
0
815
0
814
0
823
0
813
0
812
0
6
5
87
26
09
02
52
16
55
07
76
08
05
30
40
20
10 00
94 01
60 45
10 00
10 00
75 11
88 01
10 00
80 24
30 18
25 00
20 19
10 00
40 25
खुली जगह
0
रोड
0
825
0
837
0
838
0
835
0
840
0
834
0
रोड
0
982
0
983
0
987
0
रोड 992G1/09-9
84 02
95 28
35 24
95 23
14 04
92 28
81 02
86 01
66 07
80 24
20 20
89 01 1436
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
1
2
3
4
0
978
0
988
0
977
0
989
0
1179
0
1178
0
1177
0
1156
0
1164
0
1165
0
1166
0
1167
रोड
0
0
1539
1538
0
1537
0
1536
नाला
0
0
1548
0
1549
0
1532
0
1531
0
1514
हरीपर
नाला
0
0
105
0
101
0
103
0
102
रोड
0
0
72
0
73
0
74
0
70
14
[Part II-So:. 3 (ii ) ] 5
6
10
29.
20
87
13
64
26
25
19
28
15
27
16
71
19
94
14
05
11
87
05
79
20
88
04
49
00
94
05
88
47
97
13
73
51
38
04
05
00
10
00
10
20
81
46
83
20
95
23
75
18
81
02
89
29
00
04
60
14
01
19
90
17
16
05
23 1437 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
6
5
4
3
2
1
24
09
0
68
ン
30
24
0
खुली जगह
82
08
0
36
12
0
89
35
17
29
0
34
12
29
0
खुली जगह
[फा. सं. आर-25011/5/2009- ओ.आर. - 1 ]
बी.के.दत्ता, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 25th March, 2009
S. O. 768.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products from Viramgam to Kandla in the State of Gujrat, apipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying said pipeline it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification. :
Now, therefore in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of The Petroleum and Mineral Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein .
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may within 21 days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of the section 3 of said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to The Competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited, 3/122 , Gujarat Refinery Township , P.O. Jawaharnagar , Dist . Vadodara- 391 320 (Gujarat).
1438
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ]
SCHEDULE
District : Rajkot
State:Gujarat
Area
Name of Tahsil Name of Village SurveyNo.
Hectare
Are
Sq. Mtr.
1
2
3
4
5
6 MALIYA
ROHISHALA
0
24
95
51
0
3
16
ROAD
:
0
12
96
75
0
8
58
66
0
32
57
75
0
5
56/1
11
0
5
ROAD
73
0
0
59
10 KHAKHARECHI
0
13
ROAD
78
0
233
23
24
0
00
234
50
0
09
232
42
0
231
29
82
0
217
03
26
0
218
44
82
0
07
219
41
0
28
220
97
0
221
23
97
0
18
225
57
0
224
32
87
0
ROAD
05
36
0
183
28
40
0
187
12
41
0
188
48.
67
0
189
02
42
0
ROAD
03
27
0
178
23
09
0
177
41
60 1439
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009 /चैत्र7, 1931
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4
3
2
1
0 5
13
91
OPEN LAND
0
73
0
74
0
75
0
79
0
78
0
01
20
29 53
14
00
37
29
24 35
53
89
OPEN LAND
0
36
0
38
0
40.
0
41
0
42
0 02
44 09
'19
92' 13
11
14
28 01
62
85
OPEN LAND
0
37
0
44
0
45
0
ROAD
0
1474
0
1475
0
1476
0
03 04
57 28
45 14
06
47 00
10
71 13
07
88
03 14
OPEN LAND
0
ROAD
0
1484
0
1483
0
ROAD
0
1502
0
1500
0
1501
0
1503
0
1498
0
1504
0
1505
0
1506
0
1507
87 04
17 31:
27
00
74 05
41 14
10 00
46 43
94 26
10 00
40 06
43 12
55 29
13
95 1440
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
1
2
3
4
0 [Part II Sec . 3 (ii ) ] 5
6
08
57
RAILWAY LINE
0
1413
0
1390
0
1401
0
1394
0
1399
0
1398
0
1397
0 27
98 27
50 18
14 24
52 26
91 16
27 29
01
82
70
OPEN LAND
0
1352
0
1351
0
1350
0
1248
0
1247
0
1244
0
1245
0
1246
0
ROAD
0
1150
0
1149
0
1148
0
1146
0
1144
0
1623
0
1143
0
1141
0
1140
0
1139
0
1137
0
1132
0
1131
0
1130
1 07
48 05
87
06
12 13
41
17
90
02
87
16
54
30
73
08
49
00
82
20
43
49
58
37
89
21
40
00
10
00
10
17
35
22
80
01
19 .
34
51
17
14
29
74
00
17
11
05
OPEN LAND
SULTANPUR
0
ROAD
00
43 1441
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]
4
3
2
1
0
170
0
169
0
168
0
167
0
166
0
165
0
164
0
150
0
151
0
152
0
146
153
0
143
0
144
0
145
0
RIVER
MANABA
0
23
0
24
0
25
0
36
0
38
0
39
0
52
0
51
0
50
0
49
0
48
0
42
0
45
0
44
0
ROAD
0
74
0
ROAD
0
68
5
6
34 03
34.
00 13
90
05 17
51 13
07
10 07
07 14
00 35
20 01
35
63 04
25
95
12 11
05
46
32 08
18
65 00
10 36
31
27 00
:
11
60 29
43 03
14 08
76 10
44 11
17
66 11
11
11 05
97 17
39 03
34
72 02
55
22
76 05
02
18 1442
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7 , 1931
1
2
3
4
0
67
0
66
0
ROAD
0
65
WADHARWA
0
264
0
265
0
261
0
260
0
253
0
252
0
246
0
245
0
244
0
243
0
ROAD
0
271
0
272
0
273
0
ROAD
0
334
0
335
0
333
0 [Part II Sec . 3 ( ii ) ) 5
6
26
76 25
67 03
87 21
03 27
40 22
26 11
88 07
22 18
76 15
36 17
48 13
23 08
21
00
10
04
75
19
59
14
49
26
22
05
46
56
07
00
10
00
10
05
OPEN LAND
0
350
0
351
0
349
0
99
39
93
00
10
33
34
79
16
OPEN LAND
0
359
0
389
0
390
0
406
0
405
0
404
0
403/2
64
13
44
22
CO
10
00
10
29
81.
27
09
11
74 1443
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4
3
2
1
0
403/1
0
401
:
0
400
0
396
0
397
0
399
0
398
0
ROAD
KHIRAI
0
14/2
0
15
0
ROAD
0
169/1
0
168
0
170
0
171/4
0
171/3
0
171/2
0
171/1
0
172
0
173
0
174
0
ROAD
0
9
0
4/1
0
4/2
0
4/3
0
3
0
2
0
1/1
0
ROAD
0
82/2
0
82/1
0
6
5
81 17
:
95 01
16 21
25 00
06 19
18 07
74 40
20 00
42 21
10 00
60 07
20 49
37 01
40 19
60 14
74 15
09
01
85 11
97 01
30 32
32 24
97 04
45 00
13. 05
47 08
95 10
90 60
33 03
99 08
23 03
66 39
17 .
03
35
40
OPEN LAND
0
84
992G1/09-10
29 12 1444
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009 /CHAITRA 7, 1931
1
2
3
4
0 [Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii )] 5
6
63
10
OPEN LAND
0
88
0
ROAD
MALIYA
0
649
0
647
0
NALA
0
646
0
651
0
652
0
654
0
655
0
ROAD
0
665
0
664
0
669
0.
NALA
0
816
0
817
0
815
0
814
0
823
0
813
0
812
0 00
10 04
54 26
87 02
09
16
52 07
55
08
76
30
05
20
40
00
10
01
94
45
60
00
10
00
10
11
75
01
88
00
10
24
80
18
30
00
25
19
20
00
10
25
OPEN LAND
0
ROAD
0
825
0
837
0
838
0
835
0
840
0
834
0
ROAD
0
982
0
983
40
02
84
28
95
24
35
23
95
04
14
28
92
02
81
01
86
07
66
24
80 1445
भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
4
3
2
1
0
987
0
ROAD
0
978
988
0
977
0
989
0
1179
0
1178
0
1177
0
1156
0
1164
0
1165
0
1166
0
1167
0
ROAD
0
1539
0
1538
0
1537
0.
1536
0
NALA
0
1548
0
1549
0
1532
0
1531
0
1514
0
HARIPAR
NALA
0
105
0
101
0
103
0
102
0
ROAD
0
72
0
73
0
74
6
5
20 20
01
89
29 10
87 20
64 13
25 26
28 19
27 15
71 16
94 19
05 14
87 11
79 05
88 20
49 04
94 00
88 05
97 47
73 13
38 51
05 04
10 00
10 00
81 20
46
83
95 20
75 23
81 18
89 02
00 29
60 04
01 14
90 19
16 17 1446
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009 /CHAITRA 7 , 1931
[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] 1
2
3
4
5
6
0
05
23
70
0
24
09
68
0
30
24
OPEN LAND
0
82
36
08
0
12
89
35
0
17
34
29
0
12
29
OPEN LAND
[ F. No. R-25011/5/ 2009- O.R. - I ] B.K. DATTA , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 25 मार्च, 2009
1
का. आ. 769.-केंद्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य के विरमगांम से कांडला तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑईल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , द्वारा विरमगांम -कांडला ब्रांच पाईपलाईन बिछानी जानी चाहिये ।
और , केंद्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी पाईपलाईन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए ऐसी भूमि जिसके भीतर पाईपलाईन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, के उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करना आवश्यक है ।
अतः केंद्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाईन ( भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का उपयोग करते हुए , उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ।
कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि से हितबद्ध है, उक्त अधिनियम , की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गयी अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलबद्ध करा दिये जाने की तारिख से इक्कीस दिनों के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन या भूमि के अंदर पाईपलाईन बिछाने के संबंध में आक्षेप , लिखित रूप में सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑईल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमीटेड , 3/122 , गुजरात रिफाइनरी टाउनशिप , पो.ऑ. जवाहरनगर , जि. वडोदरा -391 320 , गुजरात , को कर सकेगा । 1447
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
अनुसूची जिला : सुरेंद्रनगर
गांव का नाम
राज्य : गुजरात
क्षेत्रफल
सर्वे संख्या
तहसिल का नाम
1
2
3
मोठी मजीठी
दसाडा
613
617
618
638
686
667/1
667/2
668
666
664
662
658
659
654
रोड
691
726
692
690
689
734
735
रोड
5
रोड
55
57
56
रोड
वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर
एयर
4
5
6 0
54
71 0
73
35
0
21
23
37
0
62 0
59
80 0
20
07. 0
00
44
93 0
02
0
16
76
08
33 0
90 0
11
0
11
06
52 0
03:
0
12
38 0
03
40 0
20
37 0
27
54
13
0
50 0
16
34 0
13
23 0
27
42 0
00
17
0
07
22
20
0
15 0
02
82 0
00
10
16
0
58
20
0
08
41 0
02 1448
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7 , 1931
1
2
3
4
0
59
0 [Part II Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] 5
6
17
16
56
00
खुली जगह
0
88
0
87
रोड
0
0
102
0
92
0
96
0
99
0.
98
रोड
0
0
205
0
203
0
204
0
202
0
209
0
197
रोड
0
0
नानी मजीठी
79
0
78
0
77
0
83
0
84
0
85
0
91
0
90
0
100
0
101
0
102
0
103
0
104
0
105
0
111
0
110
0
114
00
10
08
48
02
71
19
54
05
86
10
08
23
83
33
70
04
02
14
37
01
13
27
80
00
10
22
33
51
80
05
75
25
95
11
92
01
22
12
44
13
08
08
78
06
27
17
15
14
02
15
97
18
34
21
08
18
57
14
37
24
22
00
38
00
10 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1449
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
1
2
3
4
0
115
0
116
0
117
रोड
0
0
124
0
119
0
118
0
120
रोड
0
106
नाना गोरैय्या
0
105
0
122
0
104
0
1
99
123
0
77
0
0
76
73
0
72
0
74/1
0
71
0
नाला
0
कछोलिया
440/3
0
440/8
0
रोड
0
214
0
0
215
221
0
220
0
रोड
0
0
440/2
बजाना
6
5
08
11
18
74
11
06
07
62
23
05
19
68
25
10
00
10
71
03
00
10
51
05
61
51:
00
10
29
90
25
56
32
90
30
05
32
33
24
05
18
85
00
10
07
77
54
37
20
51
11
02
39
40
00
98
00
55
57
25
04
09
00
10
खुली जगह
1
520
0
0
512' रोड
0
10
58
00
10
15
06
03
56 1450
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7 , 1931
2
1
3
4
0
510
493
0
494
0
496
0
486
0
485
0
498
0
रोड
0
387
0
386
0
0
389
412
0
रोड
0
394
0
393
0
0
392
[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii )| 5
6
14
44
24
04
19
14
80
33
29
18
24
78
10
34
19
09
38
30
48
25
28
77
30
32
03
33
23
81
15
54
27
52
खुली जगह
0
312
0
रोड
0
207
0
208
0 12
42
51
90
04
24
22
63
18
92
खुली जगह
0
174
0
173
0
172
0
रोड
0
मालवन
28
15
16
49
29
94
00
10
07
49
खुली जगह
0
133
0
393
0
134
0
135
0
136
0
167
0
166
0
163
0 38
31
44
70
48
70
14
19
09
71.
27
20
34
93
31
17
30
15 1451
भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4
3
2
1
0
162
0
161
0
6
5
10
52
18'
16
52
02
खुली जगह
0
197/1
0
205
0
201
0
202
0
203
रोड
0
0
270
0
268
0
266
0
312
रोड
0
0
313
0
314
0
346
0
347
0
348
0
344
रोड
0
0
407
0
413
0
411
0
412
0
634/9
0
50
42
12
14
51
10
32
03
45
38
01
05
04
12
20
51
55
41
47
22
02
03
56
15
90
45
51
28
10
00
65
28
15
19
42
08
38 01
45 25
65 20
25 11
46 12
75. 15
खुली जगह
0
391
0
390
0
76 01
35 16
20 04
खुली जगह
0
नाला
पिपली
0
70 05
05 72
खुली जगह
0
67
0
75
992GI/09-11
22. 37
82 14 1452
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
1
2
3
4
0
74
0
76
0
73
0
78
0
80
0
81
0
82
0
87
0
91
0
92
0
90
0 [Part II- Sec. 3(ii ) ] 5
6
01
10
13
94
12
61
07
10
14
50
02
63
12
67
35
96
17
93
01
15
33
65
22
खुली जगह
0
181
रोड
0
0
136
0
137
0
31
23
56
06
83
37
20
54
03
64
खुली जगह
0
275
0
405
0
403
0
404
0
406
0
408
0
409
0
410
रोड
0
0
427
0
426.
0
424
0
423
रोड
0
0
610
0
619
23
25
37
12
25
00
10
35
65
00
26
13
68
10
12
06
42
04
05
24
96
03
57
57
25,
16
40
06
04
45
25
50
85 1453
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
[ II- 3 (ii) ]
4
3
2
1
0
रोड
0
726
0
742
0
743
0
748
0
749
0
755
0
756
0
765
0
766
0
767
0 5
6
13
78
27
39
15
40
15
38
10
00
82
21
62
31
30
09
90
12
76
11
03
65
82
26
खुली जगह
0
958
0
956
0
955
0 28
95
37
08
99
27
29
24
खुली जगह
0
924
0
925
0
26
17
07
19
17
07
खुली जगह
0
904
0
905
0
907
0
906
0
898
0
897
0
896
0 20
20
23
60
32
02
10
96
26
46
12
80
00
10
40
15
खुली जगह
0
910
0
909
अखीयाना
13
75
10
87
20
खुली जगह
0
0
134
18
19
28
25
खुली जगह
0
0
135
26
14
09 1454
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/ CHAITRA 7 , 1931
1
2
3
4
127
0
0
128
0
129
रोड
धुमत
0
347
0
372
0
373
0
366
0
367
0
365
0
362
0
364
0
363
0
360
0
359
0
386
0
311
0
0
388
0
389
390
0
391
0
0
393
392
-0
0
309
304
0
303
0
रोड
0
431
0
432
0
461
0
462
0
463
0
704
0
483
0
[Part II--Sec . 3 (ii ) ] 5
6
27
10
19
12
14
98
01
65
18
49
13
70
12
15
26
41
17
96
15
16
07
42
00
10
05
40
28
96
13
55
00
40
05
74
01
42
10
10
10
44
49
52
07
36
24
02
00
10
48
79
30
95
03
71
30
90
03
51
10
07
47
22
00
41
53
04
23
30 1455
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
4
3
2
1
0
484
0
486
0
485
0
481
रोड
0
0
496
0
497/2
0
497/1
0
498
0
499
0
564
0
563
0
560
0
561/1
0
561/2
0
558
रोड
0
0
583
0
584
0
585
रोड
0
0
602
0
603
0
604
0
605
0
6
5
42
19
67
04
42
89
47
15
40
07
28
12
81
06
30
28
41
01.
75
13
35
18
25
16
25
01
34
35
64
01
31
12
45
04
65
45
41
00
67
19
09
48
61
05
09
11
03
33
06 04
87
11
खुली जगह
0
607
0
606
0
608
0
609
वसाडवा
0
386
0
400
0
401
96 14
10 00
43 34
48 22
10 00
10 08
80 09 1456
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
1
2
3
4
0
नदी
7
0
6
0
रोड
0
12
0
13
0
0
14
17
0
16
0
15
0
40
0
भराडा
1076/1
0
0 [Part II-Sec. 3( ii)] 5
6
38
30
09
80
24
91
03
91
20
15 05
30
27
02
01
30
07
85
42
72
01
75
20
00
86
25
खुली जगह
0
1076/2
0
1072
0
1071
0
1070
0
1069
0
1037
0
1038
रोड
0
0
1042
0
1040
रोड
0
0
1023
1 02
59
87
08
06
74
60
09
10
07
26
75
44
66
06
98
10
12
21
72
06
08
16
91
71
89
1137/1/16
रोड
0
0
1020
0
1019
0
1018
0
963
रोड
0
0
870/1
05
12
15
91
13
11
07
23
01
46
03
18
41
95 1457-
भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4
3
2
1
0
870/2
0
871
0
872
0
876
0
877
0
869
0
867/1
0
883
1
6
5
35
26
03
08
24
11
74
00
10
12
95
99
52
16
50
19
26
85
खुली जगह
0
828
0
827
0
826
0
825
0
824
0
821
0
रोड
0
795
0
796
0
801
0
802
0
803
0
806
0
807
0
812
0
808
0
809
0
810
0
811
0
रोड
रोड
मालवन
0
0
932
0
931/2
0
930
0
928
03
24
29
20
98
10
91
26
80
26
42
16
53
02
37
01
27
25
95
20
96
14
12
19
78
01
07
09
23
00
12
28
01
19
76
14
10
13
73
00
76
05
49
19
16
07
46
09
87
13 1458
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/ CHAITRA 7 , 1931
2
3
1
4
0
927
926
0
915
0
0
916
914
0
913
0
917
0
रोड
0
906
0
904
0
905/1
0
0
905/2
0
886
0
885
वावडी
0
119
0
192
0
194
0
195
196
0
197
0
200
0
202
0
208
0 [Part II Sec .3 (ii ) ]
6
5
35
54
26
76
00
10
32
08
77
08
19
54
23
99
02
46
83
85
11
46
12
33
08
75
00
10
10
00
14
88
72
42
15
26
07
85
91
24
26
16
10
18
14
57
00
16
खुली जगह
0
नदी
0
210
0
213
0
212
0
0
219
0
220
रोड
0
221
0
0
222
34
38
86
33
00
10
76
46
26
51
00
10
00
10
04
63
18
75
51
45 1459
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]
4
5
6 1
2
3
13
225
0
29
20
59
226
0
0
15
19
233
16
232
0
99
24
70
234
0
0
01
539
27
0
37
45
235
13
39
270
10
0
12
66
272
24
10
273
0
90
0
281
16
94
0
13
282
0
91
18
283
0
85
08
284
17
0
00
285
01
0
14
286
67
30
0
287
रोड
06
11
0
03
0
23
312
21
0
16
313
0
04
33.
314
0
28
25
315
32
0
28
317
29
318
0
09
0
09
37
319
0
43
322
35
10
0
323
00
रोड
0
01
03
01
0
12
321
0
15
57.
343
0
41
344
42
45
0
11
348
0
72
337
24
रोड
45
0
02
992G1/09-12 1460
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2000 CHAITRA 7 , 1931
1
2
3
4
0
349
[Part II Sec. 3 (ii )] 5
6
02
39
खुली जगह
0
जेसडा
0
नाला
0
404
0
400
0
398
0
300
0
309
रोड
0
0
391
0
386
0
385
0
384
0
383
0
381
बिरेंद्रगढ
0
152
0 32
35
06
05
06
71
40
94
16
15
83
04
16
58
02
23
21
46
12
18
20
03
21
29
20
56
66
12
35
88
30
80
खुली जगह
0
163
0
167
0
168
0
169
0
173
0
172
0
195
0
196
0
199
0
196
0 13
72
28
79
17
04
18
13
15
10
25
60
09
19
17
22
30
12
10
00
07
69
खुली जगह
0
214
0
220/1
0
231
0
226
0
228
48
76
05
80
06
32
22
90
13
67 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
4
3
2
1
0
1461
6 5
01
93
खुली जगह
0
229
0
83 00
17 01
खुली जगह
0
279/1
0
278
0
280
0
281
0
282
0
283
0 07
82
87 00
27 09
93 10
65 20
04 05
61 24
खुली जगह
0
295
0
299
0
298
0
रोड
0
326
0
325
0
323
0
324
0
रेल्वे
0
334
0
333
0
347
0
रोड
0
359
0
361
0
362
0
25 34
23 26
11
66 04
70
74 14
37 17
50 04
25 10
07
52
30 31.
78 31
59 39
36 02
48 19
11
40 08
92
06 10
खुली जगह
0
नदी
0 सतापर
14 20
.14 15
खुली जगह
0
168/1/3
रोड
0
0
21
0
29
31 19
83 04:
35
45
64 16 1462
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7 , 1931
1
2
4
3
0
30
रोड
0
0
31
0
31/2
0
68
0
69
0
67
0
66
0
70
0
72
0
73
0
74
0
75
0
76
0
77
0
113
0
112
0
78
0
82
0
83
0
84
0
96
0
85
0
95
0
91
0
89
0
90
0
92
0
जसमतपूर
165
0
164
0
162
0
161
0
158
0
157
[Part II-Sec. 3( ii )]
6
5
18
65
02
00
66
90
00
10
00
10
26
27.
13
05
12
79
28
49
20
82
17
08
46
50
75
37
26
02
35
74
00
10
02
49
11
99
06
74
14
28
40
38
04
25
14
77
18
90
32
80
07
44
17
13
23
98
19
34.
09
26
27
65
08
87
05
63
09
49 1463
भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
4
2
3
1
0
139
0
141
0
142
0
143
0
154
0
153
0
152
1
6
5
22
75
11
09
05
26
04
08
10
00
44
14
21
84
01
00
खुली जगह
0
149
0
251
0
258
0 23
34
00
10
19
28
10
00
: 409/3
0
409/2
0
267
0
268
0
408/1
0
414
0
345/2
0
345/1
0
344
0
343
0
342
रोड
0
0
341
0
340
कंकावटी
0
276
0
275
0
269
0
274
00
10
26
18
10
18
00
10
50
69
46
16
18
04
01
64
13
87
16
64
03
79
72
17
95
15
15
77
18
85
67
14
03
86
खुली जगह
1
0
280
0
273
रोड
0 37
61
16
06
06
16
02
25 1464
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7 , 1931
3
4
2
1
0
399
0
398
0
395
रोड
0
0
507
0
506
0
524
रोड
0
0
547
546
0
0
545
0
542
543
0
0
536
535
0
0
534
रोड
0
0
562
563
0
0 हलवद
रनमलपूर
650
0
651
0
648
0
656
0
657
0 [Part II Sec . 3 ( ii ) ]
6
5
00
48
73
25
47
15
02
23
20
62
87
12
07
16
71
04
41
27
70
55
27
03
10
00
73
18
17
74
20
21
14
36
08
90
41
40
61
00
26
19
11
25
63
10
79
08
32
08
09
88
खुली जगह
0
639
0
638
0
637
0
664
1 22
32
11
63
31
00
10
00
47
95
खुली जगह
0
704
0
705
0
708
12
05
19
96
50
25 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1465
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
1
2
3
4
0
709
0
711
0
714
0
742
0
741
0 5
6
00
10
10
00
24
60
37
40
60
20
36
95
खुली जगह
0
718
719
0
720
0
721
0
722
0
घनाद
07
63
09
63
12
75
08
16
20
55.
65
37
खुली जगह
0
176/2
0 .
176/1
0
175
0
173
0
174
0
183
0
184
0
164
0
163
0
159/1
0
160
रोड
0
0
नदी
0
111
0
110
0
109.
0
108
0
103
0
106
0
104
0
105
मालनीयाद
0
92
15
52
70
13
17
44
60
35
10
00
11
90
25
45.
05
89
55
39
34
30
29
80
02
88
52
00
32
41
16
05
42
80
70
29
01
04
03
42
17
95
15
21
66
54 1466
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7 , 1931
1
2
3
4.
0
91
1
83
रोड
0
0
82
0
71
0
72
0
64
0
65
रोड
0
0
40
रोड
0
0
753
0
752
0
751
0
750
0
749
0
748
0.
757
0
759
0
758
0
701
0
699
0
669
0
670
रोड
0
0
634
0
635
0
636
0
637
[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] 5
6
00
10
02
50
03
31
47
10
04
34
47
25
01
56
25
20
06
21
89
25
03
84
00
10
33
30
10
00
16
68
15
92
19
11
34
80
00
65
34
65
76
70
31
41
34
30
30
18
03
34
15
11
23
80
18
70
13
13
05
.00
खुली जगह
रोड
0
0
608
0
609
60
02
23
90
27
69 1467 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
6
3
4
2
1
0
56
44
610
60
13
0
558
00
10
0
559
39
50
0
557
12
97
0
556
20
0
10
549
41
0
19
550
0
00
35
554
21
70
0
553
78
रोड
0
01
0
05
53
532
0
82
63
533
00
10
0
534
60
0
55
535
वेगडवाव
0
43
52
265
08
22
0
284/1
25
0
09
ईशनपूर
364
56
0
20
खुली जगह
70
0
04
352
15
0
30
353
0
05
25
351
18
60
0
354
0
20
70
355
रोड
0
90
03
80
00
0
337
15
80
0
336
0
00
10.
330
10
00
0
331
20
0
22
335
19
39
0
नवा घनश्यामगढ
253
02
93
0
256
37
58
0
255
01
30
0
254
992G1/09-13 1468
7,1931
[Part II Bec . 3(ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 20
4
5
6 1
2
0
20
59
0
27
22
210
0
21
20
276
0
32
00
275
36
0
40
277
0
03
30
23
0
07
298
0
38
50
297
10
0
85
306
0
13
92
307
21
90
0
308
10
0
00
315
0
10
85
314
0
28
40
309
21
28
0
310
0
63
03
342
0
00
12
311
00
10
0
334
0.
08
84
339
0
12
80
338
0
24
84
335
0
67
19
336
0
33
04
349
0
08
42
344
24
73
0
345
रोड
0
03
27
0
40
55.
382
0
00
53
383
0
: 17
95
464
13
0
77
465
0
29
20
406
0
09
76
470
0
13
33
471
0
38
60
503 1469
भारत का राजमत्र: मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii)]
4
3
2
1
0
504
0
507
0
506/1
0
रोड
0
539
0
537
0
542
0
रोड
0
581/1
0
582
0
583
0
585
0
584
रोड
0
0
611
0
रोड
0
646
0
647
0
648
0
653
0
657
रोड
0
0
719
0
749
0
रोड
0
718
0
754/1
0
754/2
0
754/3
0
755
0
6
5
10
00
30
40
94
02
05
09
70
25
35
03
50
21
68
03
47
24
72
11
70
13
10
00
50
40
64
03
31
60
07
08
84
07
60
42
71
16
40
46
01
04
06
48
60
55
16
00
25
15
11
00
05
14.
00 06
47
11
50 19
90 13
खुली जगह
0
715
0
713
10 00
65 10 1470
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii) ] 1
2
3
4
5
6
0
17
50
756
0
68
06
757
नवा अमरापर
0
29
20
65
0
00
10
06/8
0
10
00
66/7
0
06
02
0
01
96
66/5
रोड
0
50
08
66/3
0
00
10
00
0
52
66/2
0
17
95
66/1
0
08
85
62
0
11
98
63
0
11
65
57/1
0
00
10
57/2
0
09
75
56
0
09
15
55
रोड
0
03
35
0
00
10
53
0
35
90
54
जुना अमरापर
0
40
38
96
0
23
90
94
0
00
10
93
रोड
0
03
66 हलवद
0
11
98
763
0
20
35
764
0
02
59
765
रायसंगपर
0
43
09
285
0
23
93
288
0
12
66
291.
0
28
39
289
0
01
05
290
0
39
40
295 [ भाग-II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1471
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
1
2
3
4
0
310
रोड
0
309
0
314
0
313
0
315
0
316
0
317
0
318
0
319
0
375
0
321
रोड
0
0
322
0
374
0
370
0
369
0
368
0
361
0
362
0
358
0
357
0
356
रोड
0
0
515
0
516
0
517
0
519
रोड
0
0
551
1
0
572
0
573
0
574
0
575
5
6
05
61
16
30
17
85
00
14
18
95. 00
10
00
10
00
75
03
10
04
02
50
28
19
30
13
20
00
10
21
30
39
05
03
26
22.
25
35
50
06
81
22
15
37
90
02
91
06
91
07
01
25
50
12
30
10
25
03
33
06
15
00
10
41
75
13
12
22
25 1472
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/ CHAITRA 7 , 1931
1
2
3
4
रोड
0
0
659
0
660
0
661
0
662
0
663
0 [Part II-Sec . 3(ii) ] 5
6
03
00
06
90
06
94
06
39
07
60
18
59
63.
00
खुली जगह
0
नदी
0 76
70
56
60
खुली जगह
मयुरनगर
0
463
रोड
0
0
462
धनाला
138
0
0
139
0
193
0
205
0
204
0
206
0
203
0
207
रोड
0
0
208
0
189
0
188
0
209
0
210
0
185
0
184
0
212
0
216
0
183
0
446
0
445
18
15.
10
02
01
95
15
00
18
17
59
75
52
05
09
41
03
29
00
20
29
70
25
19
28
79
10
00
00
10
07
32
30
02.
08
77
21
15
00
10
00
10
24
25
10
15
11
22 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 28 , 2009 /चैत्र 7 , 1931 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
4
3
2
1
0
444
0
443
0
रोड
0
439
0
438
0
437
0
436
0
435
0
434
0
433
0
नहर
0
376
0
377
0
375
0
374
0
373
0
372/3
0
372/2
0
372/1
0
371
0
370
0
रोड
0
367
0
253
0
254
0
255
0
256
0
257
0
258
0
259
0
260
0
262
0
261
0
263
1473 5
6
05
49
22
38
50
03
55
26
02
17
89
09
13
08
21
02
09
27
05
28
83
05
13
38
41
00
02
19
43
14
16
16 22
74 22
73
46 19
15
63
74 01
78 08
10 00
00
10
64 04
36 08
10
80
92 12
68 14
14
98
29 15
15 12
33 00
75 44 1474
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7 , 1931
1
2
3
4
0
264
0
266
0
268
0
269
0
270
0
271
0
273
0
272
नहर
0
0
275
0
276
0
279
0
280
0
281
0
283
0
282
रोड
0
रोड
जुना देवलीया
0
0
441
0
442
0
444
0
447
0
448/1
रोड
0
0
454
रोड
0
0
466
0
467
0
468
0
469
0
474
0
471
0
472
[Part II-Sec . 3( ii )] 5
6
22
12
14
52
24
34
29
58
26
17
00
10
00
26
46
48
03
44
23
20
44
02
09
54
08
88
13
95
20
60
34
44
06
51
00
49
00
10
34
60
07
92
41
05
04
16
13
49
46
80
07.
19
10
74
03
14
26
30
09
37
16
43
12
97
15
90 1475
भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4
3
2
1
0
473
0
578
0
रोड
0
577
0
576
0
574
0
573
0
1 571
0
सेड
0
649
0
650
0
629
रोड
0
0
628
1097
686
685
0
689
रोड
::
0
704
0
703
0
709
0
710
0
706
707
0
711
0
844
0
843
0
837
0
838
0
839
0
रोड
0
744
992G1/09-14
6
5
57
14
70- 17
02
65
16
16
90
22
24
54
27
05
95
30
02
72
90
52
37
03
42
40
79
99
70
00
0302
27
10
37
98
96 04:
60 32
12
91
22
13
05 15
45 23
17
64
43 02
70 25 1476
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 200INCHAITRA 7 , 1931
[Part II Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] 1
2
4
3
5
6
0
44
45
743
0
22
35
749
0
22
37
748
0
00
10
756
0
26
66
763
0
07
46
757
0.
23
78
750
0
28
33
758
[ पत्र. सं. जर-25011/7/2009- ओ.आर.- [ ]
बी. के. दत्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 25th March , 2000
S. O. 769. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products from Virangam to Kandla in the State of Gujrat , apipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas , it appears to the Contral Government that for the purpose of laying said pipeline it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification.
Now, therefore in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of The Petroleum and Mineral Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may within 21 days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub-section (1 ) of the section 3 of said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land to The Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, 3/122, Gujarat Refinery Township , P.O. Jawaharnagar, Dist. Vadodara-391 320 (Gujarat) .
1477
भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 28, 2009 चैत्र. 7, 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
SCHEDULE
State: Gujarat District: Surendranagar
Area
SurveyNo.
Name ofTahsil Name of Village
Are
Hectare
Sq.Mtr.
4
5
3
2
1
71
54
0
MOTI MAJITHI
DASADA
613
73
0
35
617
23
21
0
618
62
37
0
638
80
59
0
686
07
0
20
667/1
44
0
00
667/2
93
02
0
668
-76
16
0
666
33
0
08
664
90
0
11
662
11
06
0
658
52
03
0
659
12
0
38
854
0
40
03
ROAD
37
20
0
691
27
0
54
726
13
50
0
692
34
16
0
690
23
0
13
689
27
0
42
734
17
0
00
735
22
07
0
ROAD
15
20
0
5
82
0
02
ROAD
10
00
.0
55
0
16
58
57
08
0
20
56 1478
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NGARCE 26, 200MBHASTRA 7, 1931
[Part II Sec. 3 ( ii )] 1
2
4
5
6
ROAD
0
02
41
0
17
16
59
0
00
56
OPEN LAND
00
10
0
08
48
87
ROAD
0
02
71
0
19
54
102
05
86
92
G
0
10
08
96
0
23
83
$99
0
33
70
98
ROAD
0
04
02
0
14
37
205
0
01
13
203
0
27
80
204
0
00
10
202
0
22
33
209
0
51
80
197
ROAD
0
05
75 NANIMAJITHI
0
95
25
79
0
11
92
78
0
01
22
77
12
0
44
83
0
13
08
84
0
08
78
85
0
27
06
91
0
17
15
90
0
14
02
100
0
15
97
101
0
34
18
102
0
21
08
103
0
18
57
104
0
14
37
105 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4
3
2
0
111
0
110
0
114
0
115
0
116
0
117
0
ROAD
0
124
0
119
:
0
118
0
120
0
ROAD
106
NANA GORAIYA
0
0
105
0
122
0
104
1
99
0
123
0
77
0
76
0
73
0
72
0
74/1
0
71
0
NALA
KACHOLIYA
0
440/3
0
440/8
ROAD
0
0
214
0
215
0
221
0
220
0
ROAD
1479
6 5
22 24
38 00
10 00
11 08
74 18
06 11
62 07
05 23
68 19
10 25
10 00
71 03
10 00
05 51
61 51
10 00
29
90.
56 25
90 32
05 30.
33 32.
24
05
85 18.
10 00
77 07
37 54
51 20
02 11
40 39
00
98
55 00
25 57
09 04 1480
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7 , 1931
[Part II-Sec . 3( ii ) ] 1
2
3
4
6
5
0
440/2
10
00
BAJANA
OPEN LAND
1
58
10
520
0
00
10
512
0
15
06
*ROAD
0
03
56
510
0
14
44
493
0
24
04
494
0
19
14
496
80
33
486
0
18
29
0
485
24
78
498
10
0
34
ROAD
0
19
09
387
0
38
30
386
0
25
48
389
0
77
28
0
412
30
32
ROAD
0
03
33
394
0
23
81
393
0
15
54
392
0
27
52
OPEN LAND
0
42
12
312
0
51
90
ROAD
0
04
24
0
207
22
63
0
208
18
92
OPEN LAND
28
0
15
174.
0
16
49
173
0
29
94
172
0
00
10
ROAD
0
07
49 MALWAN
0
OPEN LAND
38
31
133
0
70
44 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
2
4 1
3
393
0
0
134
0
135
0
136
167
0
0
166
0
163
0
162
161
0
0
OPEN LAND
0
197/1
205
0
201
0
202
0
203
0
ROAD
0
270
0
268
0
0
266
0
312
ROAD
0
313
0
314
0 .
346
0
:
347
0
0
348
344
0
ROAD
0
407
0
413
0
411
0
412
0
634/9
0
1481
6 5
48
70 .
14
19 09
71 27
20 34
93 31
17 30
15 10
52 16
18
52 02
42
50 12
14
51 10
03
32 38、
45 05
01 12
04 51
20 41.
55 22
47 03
02 15
56 45
90 28
51 00
10 28
65 19
15. 08
42 01
38 25
45
65 20
11
25 12
46 1482
[Part II-Sec .3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7 , 1931
6
4
5
3
2
1
75
0
15
OPEN LAND
76
01
0
391
35
16
0
390
20
0
04
OPEN LAND
0
05
70 PIPLI
NALA
72
05
0
OPEN LAND
22
0
37
67
82
0
14
75
10
01
0
74
94
13
0
76
61
12
0
73
10
07
0
78
14
0
50
80
02
63
0
81
12
67
0
82
0
35
96
87
17
0
93
91
15
01
0
92
65
33
0
90
31
22
0
OPEN LAND
23
56
0
181
83
0
06
ROAD
0
37
20
136
54
03
0
137
23
64
0
OPEN LAND
37
0
25
275
25
12
0
405
10
00
0
403
35
65
0
404
26
00
0
406
0
13
68
408
10
12
0
409
06
42
0
410 1483 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
6
4
5
2
3
1
0
04
05
ROAD
0
96
24
427
03
57
0
426
57
0
25
424
0
16
40
423
0
06
04
ROAD
0
25
45
610
0
50
85
619
0
13
78
ROAD
0
27
39
726
40
0
15
742
0
38
743
15
0
00
10
748
0
21-
82
749.
62
0
31
755
30
0
09
756
12
0
90
765
0
11
76
766
65
0
03
767
0
26
82
OPEN LAND
0
28
95
958
37
0
08
956
0
27
99
955
σ
24
29
OPEN LAND
17
26
0
924
0
19
07
925
0
07
17
OPEN LAND
0
20
20
904
0
23
60
905
0
02
32
907
0
10
96
906
0
26
46
898
0
12
80
897
992GI/09-15 1484
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/ CHAFTRA 7 , 1931
[Part II-Sec . 3( ii) ] 2
3
4
5
6
00
10
896
.0
0
40
15
OPEN LAND
13
0
75
910
0
10
87
909
AKHIYANA
OPEN LAND
0
20
18
134
0
28
19
OPEN LAND
0
25
26
135
0
14
09
127
0
27
10
0
128
12
19
129
0
14
98 DHRANGADHRA DHRUMATH
ROAD
0
01
65
347
0
18
49
372
70
0
13
373
0
12
15
366
0
26
41
367
0
17
96
365
0
15
16
362
0
07
42
384
0
10
00
363
0
40
05
360
0
28
96
0
13
359
55
0
396
00
40
0
311
05
74
0
01
388
42
0
389
10
10
390
0
10
44
0.
391
49
52
0
07
393
36
392
0
24
02
0
00
309
10
304
0
48
79 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
1485
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009 /चैत्र 7, 1931
4
3
2
1
303
ROAD
0
0
431
0
432
0
461
0
462
0
463
0
704
0
483
0
484
0
486
0
485
0
481
ROAD
0
0
496
0
497/2
0
497/1
0
498
0
499
0
564
0
563
0
560
0
561/1
0
561/2
0
558
ROAD
0
0
583
0
584
0
585
ROAD
0
0
602
0
603
0
604
6 5
95 30
71 03
30
90 03
51
07 10
22 47
41. 00
04 53
30 23
42 19
67 04
42
89
47 15
40 07
12
28
81 06
30 28
01
41 13
75
35 18
25 16
25 01
34 35.
64 01
31 12
45 04
65:
45
41
00
67 19
09
48,
61 05
09 11
03 33 1488
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAETRA 7, 1931
2
3
4
0
808
0
809
0
810
0
811
0
ROAD
MALWAN
ROAD
0
0
932
0
931/2
0
930
0
928
0
927
0
926
915
0
916
0
0
914
0
913
917
0
ROAD
0
906
904
0
905/1
0
905/2
0
0
886
0
885
WAWDI
0
119
192
0
0
194
195
0
196
0
0
197
0
200
202
0
208-
0 [Part II -Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] 5
6 12
28
01 19
14
76 13
10 00
73 05
76 19
49
16 07
09
46 13
87 35
54 26
76 00
10 32
08 08
77 19
54 23
99
46 02
83
85 11
46 12
33 08
75 00
10 00
10 14
88 42
72 26
15 07
85 24
91 26
16 10
18 57
14 00
16 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
2
3
4
0
OPEN LAND
RIVER
0
210
0
213
0
212
0
219
0
220
0
ROAD
0
221
0
222
0
225
0
226
0
233
0
232
0
234
0
539
0
235
270
0
272
0
273
0
281
0
0
282
283
0
284
0
285
0
286
0
287
0
ROAD
0
0
312
313
0
314
0
315
0
317
0
1489 5
6 38
34 33
86 00
10 46
76 26
51 00
10 00
10 04
63 18
75 45
51 13
29 20
59 15
19 16
99 24
70 01
27 45
37 13
39 12
66 24
10 16
90 13.
94 18
91 08
85 00
17 14
01 30
67 06
11 03
23 21
16 04
33 28
25 28
32 [Part II Sec . 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/ CHAITRA 7, 1931
1490
6
5
4
3
2
1
29
09
0
318
37
09
0
319
35
43
0
322
10
00
0
323
ROAD
01
03
0
01
12
0
321
15
57
0
343
42
41
0
344
45
11
0
348
72
24
0
337
45
02
0
ROAD
02
39
0
349
35
32
0
OPEN LAND
05
0
06
NALA
JESDA
71
0
06
404
94
0
40
400
16
15
0
396
83
04
0
390
0
58
16
389
23
02
0
ROAD
21
46
0
391
18
12
0
386
03
20
0
385
21
29
0
384
56
20
0
383
66
12
0
381
88
35
0
VIRENDRAGADH
152
80
30
0
OPEN LAND
72
0
13
163
79
0
28
167
0
04
17
168
13
18
0
169
10
15
0
173 1491
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4
3
2
1
0
172
0
195
0
196
0
199
0
198
0
6 5
60 25
19 09
17 22
12 30
10 00
69 07
OPEN LAND
0
214
0
220/1
0
231
0
226
0
228
0
76 48
80 05
32 06
90 22
67 13
93 01
OPEN LAND
0
229
0
83 00
17 01
OPEN LAND
0
279/1
0
278
0
280
0
281
0
282
0
283
0
82 07
87 00
27 09
93 10
65 20
04 05
61 24
OPEN LAND
0
295
0
299
0
298
0
ROAD
0
326
0
325
0
323
0
324
0
RAILWAY
0
334
0
333
0
347
992GI/09-16
25 34
23 26
88 11
70 04
74 14
37 17
50 04
25 10
52 07
30 31
76 31
59 39 1492
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009 /CHAITRA 7, 1931 1
2
3
4
ROAD
0
0
359
0
361
0
362
0 [Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii )] 8
6 02
36 19
48 11
40 08
92 10
OPEN LAND
0
RIVER
SATAPAR
0
06 20
14 15
OPEN LAND
0
188/1/3
ROAD
0
0
21
29
0
0
30
ROAD
0
0
31
0
31/2
0
68
0
69
0
67
0
66
0
70
0
72
0
73
0
74
0
75
76
0
77
0
0
113
0
112
0
78
0
82
0
83
0
84
0
96
14 19
31 04
83 35
45 16
64 18
65 02
00 66
90 00
10 00
10 26
27 13
05 12
79 28
49 20
82 17
08 46
50 37
75 26
02 35
74 00
10 02
49 11
99 06
74 14
28 38
40 04
25 1493
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
4
3
2
1
0
85
0
95
0
91
89
0
90
0
92
JASMATPUR
0
165
0
164
0
162
0
161
0
158
0
157
0
139
0
141
0
142
0
143
0
154
0
153
0
152
1
6 5
14
77 18
90 32
80 07
44
17 13
23
98 19
34 09
26 27
65
87 08
05
63
49 09
22
75 11
09 26
05..
04
08
10 00
14
44
84 21
01
00
OPEN LAND
0
149
0
251
0
258
0
409/3
0
409/2
0
267
0
268
0
408/1
0
414
0
345/2
0
345/1
0
344
0
343
23
34
10 00
19 28
00
10 00
10 26
18. 18
10
10 00
50 69
16
46 18
04
64 01
13
87 1494
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009 CHAITRA 7, 1931
[Part II Sec. 3( ii )] 1
2
3
6
4
5
0
16
64
342
ROAD
0
03
79
0
17
72
341
0
15
95
340
KANKAVATI
276
0
15
77
275
0
18
85
269
0
14
67
274
0
03
86
OPEN LAND
1
37
61
280
0
06
16
273
0
16
06
ROAD
0
02
25
399
0
48
00
0
398
25
73
395
0
47
15
ROAD
0
02
23
507
0
20
62
506
0
12
87
524
0
16
07
ROAD
0
04
71
547
0
27
41
546
0
55
70
0
545
03
27
542
0
00
10
543
0
18
73
0
536
17
74
0
535
21
20
534
0
14
36
ROAD
0
08
90
562
0
41
40
563
0
00
61 HALVAD
RANMALPUR
0
19
850
26
0
25
11
651 1495
भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[ भाग II- खण्ड3 ( ii) ]
4
3
2
1
0
648
0
656
0
657
0
6 5
10
63 08
79
32 08
88 09
OPEN LAND
0
639
0
638
0
637
0
664
1
32 22
63 11
00 31
00
10
95 47
OPEN LAND
0
704
0
705
0
708
0
709
0
711
0
714
0
742
0
741
0 12
05 19
96 50
25 00
10
10 00
60 24
40 37
20
60
95 36
OPEN LAND
0
718
0
719
0
720
0
721
0
722
GHANAD
0 07
63
63 09
12
75
: 16 08
20
55 65
37
OPEN LAND
0
176/2
0
176/1
0
175
0
173
0
174
0
183
0
184
0
164
0
163
15
52 13
70
44 17
35
60 00
10
90 1.1
45
25 05
89
55 39 1496
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931 1
3
2
4
0
159/1
0
160
0
ROAD
0
RIVER
0
111
0
110
0
109
0
108
0
103
0
106
0
104
0
105
MALANIAD
0
92
0
91
1
83
0
ROAD
0
82
0
71
0
72
0
64
0
65
0
ROAD
0
40
ROAD
0
0
753
0
752
0
751
0
750
0
749
0
748
0
757
0
759
0
758
[Part II -Sec . 3 ( ii) ]
6 5
34
30 29
80 02
88 52
00 32
41 16
05 42
80 29
70 01
04 03 .
42 17
95 21
15
66 54
00
10 02
50 03
31 47
10 04
34 47
25 01
56
20 25
21 06
89
25 03
84 00
10 33
30 00
10 16
68 15
92 19
11 34
80 00
65 34
65 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
1497 1
2
3
4
5
6
0
76
70
701
0
31
41
699
0
34
30
669
0
18
30
670
ROAD
0
03
34
0
11
15
634
0
23
80
635
0
18
70
636
0
13
13
637
0
05
00
OPEN LAND
0
ROAD
02
60
0
23
90
608
0
27
69
609
0
56
44
610
0
13
60
558
0
00
10
559
0
39
50
557
0
12
97
556
0
10
20
549
0
19
41
550
0
00
35
554
0
21
70
553
ROAD
0
01
78
0
05
53
532
0
63
82
533
0
00
534
10
0
55
60
535
VEGADVAV
265
0
43
52
284/1
0
22
08
ISANPUR
0
09
25
364
0
56
20
OPEN LAND
0
04
70
352
0
15
30
353 1498
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
4
3
2
0
351
0
354
0
355
0
ROAD
0
337
0
336
0
330
0
331
0
335
0. NAVA
253
GHANSHYAMGADH
0
256
0
255
0
254
0
269
0
270
0
276
0
275
0
277
0
ROAD
0
298
0
297
0
306
0
307
0
308
0
315
0
314
0
309
0
310
0
312
0
311
0
334
0
339
0
338
[Part II-Sec. 3( ii ) ) 5
6
25 05
60 18
70 20
03
90
80 00
80 15
10 00
10 00
20 22
39 19
93 02
37
58 01
30 20
59 27
22
20 21
00
32
40 36
30 03
23 07
50 38
10
85
92 13
90 21
10 00
10
85
40 28
21
28 03
63
12 00
10 00
84 08
80 12 भारत का रेजिपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931 [ भांग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4
3
2
0
335
0
336
0
349
0
344
0
345
0
ROAD
0
382
0
383
0
464
0
465
0
406
0
470
0
471
0
503
0
504
0
507
0
506/1
0
ROAD
0
539
0
537
0
542
0
ROAD
0
581/1
0
582
0
583
0
585
0
584
0
ROAD
0
611
0
ROAD
0
646
0
647
0
648
992G1/09-17
1499
6
5
84 24
67 19
04 33
42 08
73 24
27 03
40 55
53 00
95 17
77 13
20 29
76 09
33 13
60 38
10 00
30 40
94 02
09 05.
70 25
35 03
50 21
68 03
47 24
72 11
70 13
10 00
50 40
64 03
60 31
07 08
84 07
60 42
71 16 1500
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/CHAITRA 7 , 1931 1
2
3
4
0
653
0
657
ROAD
0
0
719
0
749
ROAD
0
718
0
0
754/1
0
754/2
0
754/3
0
755
OPEN LAND
0
715
0
0
713
0
756
0
757
NAVA AMRAPAR
0
65
0
66/8
0
66/7
0
0
66/5
ROAD
0
66/3
0
0
66/2
0
66/1
0
62
63
0
0
57/1
0
57/2
0
56
0
55
ROAD
0
53
0 [Part II-Sec. 3 (ii ) ) 5
6 46
40 04
01 06
48 55
60 00
16 15
25 00
11 14
05 06
00 11
47 19
50 13
90 00
10 10
65 17
50 06
68 29
20 00
10 00
10 06
02 01
96 08
50 00
10 00
52 17
95 08
85 11
98 11
65 00
10 09
75 09
15 03
35 00
10 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
4
3.
2
0
54
0 JUNA AMRAPAR
96
0
94
0
93.
0
ROAD
0 HALVAD
763
0
764
0
765
0 RAISANGPAR
285
0
288
0
291
0
289
0
290
0
295.
0
310
0
ROAD
0
309
0
314
0
313
0
315
0
316
0
317
0
318
0
319
0
375
0
321
0
ROAD.
322
0
0
374
0
370
0
369
0
368
0
361
1501
6 5
35
90 38
40 23
90
10 00
66 03
11
98 20
35
59 02
43
09
93 23
12
66
39 28
01
05 39
40 05
61
30 16
17
85
14 00
18
95
10 00
10 00
00
75
10 03
04
02 28
50
30 19
20 13
00
10
30 21
05 39
26 03
22
25
50 35 1502
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 200MCHAITRA 7,1931
[Part II-Sec. 3( ii )) 1
2
4
3
5
6
0
06
81
382
22
0
15
358
37
90
357
0
02
91
356
0
06
ROAD
91
0
07
01
515
0
50
25
510
0
12
30
517
0
10
25
519
0
03
ROAD
33
0
06
15
551
00
10
572
0
41
573
75
0
19
12
574
0
22
25
675
ROAD
03
0
00
0
06
90
659
0
06
94
660
0
06
661
39
0
07
60
662
0
18
683
59
0
63
OPEN LAND
0
76
70
RIVER
MAYURNAGAR
0
56
60
OPEN LAND
0
18
15
463
ROAD
0
02
10
0
01
462
95 DHANALA
138
0
00
15
0
18
17
130
0
75
50
193
0
05
52
205
0
00
41
204
0
03
29
206 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
1503
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
1
2
3
4
0
203
0
207
ROAD
0
0
208
0
189
0
188
0
209
0
210
0
185
0
184
0
212
0
216
0
183
0
446
0
445
0
444
0
443
ROAD
0
0
439
0
438
0
437
0
436
0
435
0
434
0
433
0
CANAL
0
376
0
377
0
375
0
374
0
373
0
372/3
0
372/2
6 5
00
20
70 29
25
19 28
79 00
10 00
10 07
32 02
30
77 08
21
15 00
10 00
10 24
25 10
15 11
22 49
05
22 38
03
50 26
55 17
02 09
89 08
13 02
21 27
09 28
05 05
83 38
13 00
41 02
19 14
43 16
16 22
74 22
73 1504
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7 , 1931
2
1
3
4
0
372/1
0
37.1
0
370
ROAD
0
367
0
0
253
0
254
0
255
0
256
0
257
0
258
0
259
0
260
0
262
0
261
0
263
0
264
0
266
0
268
0
269
0
270
0
271
0
273
0
272
0
CANAL
0
275
0
276
0
279
0
280
0
281
0
283
0
282
ROAD
0 [Part II- Sec. 3 ( ii) ] 5
6 19
46 15
63 01
74 08
78
10 00
00
10 04
64 08
36 10
80 12
92 14
68 14
98 15
29 12
15
33 00
44
75 22
12 14
52 24
34 29
58 26
17 00
10 00
26 46
48 03
44 23
20 44
02 09
54 08
88 13
95 20
60 34
44 06
51 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
1505
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
3
1
2
4 JUNA DEVALIYA
0
ROAD
441
0
0
442
0
444
0
447
0
448/1
0
ROAD
0
454
ROAD
0
0
466
0
467
0
468
0
469
0
474
0
471
0
472
0
473
0
578
ROAD
0
0
577
0
576
0
574
0
573
0
571
ROAD
0
0
649
0
650
0
629
ROAD
0
0
628
0
1097
0
686
0
685
5
6
49 00
10 00
60 34
92 07
41
05
16 04
49 13
46
80 07
19 10
74
14 03
26
30 09
37 16
43 12
97 15
90 14
57 17
70 02
65 16
16 22
90 24
54 27
05 30
95
72 02
52
90 03
37 42
40 04
79 18
99 31
95 36
70 00
10 1506
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii)]
6
3
4
5
2
1
0
92
43
689
0
03
02
ROAD
0
27
34
704
10
00
0
703
37
0
37
709
98
0
07
710
0
04
96
708
0
90
35
707
60
0
32
711
12
91
0
844
0
22
13
843
05
0
15
837
23
45
0
838
17
64
0
839
0
43
ROAD
02
0
25
70
744
45
0
44
743
0
22
35
749
0
22
37
748
0
00
10
756
26
0
66
763
07
0
46
757
23
0
78
759
0
28
33
758
[ F. No. R-25011/7/2009- O.R. -I ]
B.K. DATTA; Under Secy.
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग -खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
1507 :
Management
श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 25 फरवरी , 2009
का.आ. 770, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैं. कोचिम रिफाइनरिज लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या-1 , एरनाकुलम के पंचाट ( सदर्भ सं. 40/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-2-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -30012/ 111/97-आई आर ( सी-1 ) ]
स्नेह लता अवास , डेस्क अधिकारी MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT New Delhi , the 25th February, 2009 S.O. 770.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No.40/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. I, Ernakulam now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Cochin Refineries Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 25-2-2009.
[No. L-30012/ 111 /97- IR(C-I)] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT,
ERNAKULAM
Present: Shri P.L. Norbert, B.A. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer , (Wednesday the 18th day of February, 2009/29th Magha 1930)
L. D. 40/2006
(I.D. 13/2004 of State Labour Court, Ernakulam) : 1. The General Secretary, Union
Cochin Refineries
Association , "Karuna "
Employees Patutheri Bridge,
Edappally, Cochin
682024.
2 Sri. George Joseph, Badge
No. 1663
Maintenance
Department,
Cochin Refineries Limited,
Ambalamughal, Cochin-
682302.
By Adv. C. S. Ajith Prakash. 992GI/09-18
1. The Chairman & Managing Director, Cochin Refineries Limited. Ambalamoghal , Cochin- 682302.
2.TheGeneral Manager (HRM) , CochinRefineries Limited, Ambalamughal, Cochin-682 302.
ByAdv. M/s Menon and Pai .
The case coming up for final hearing on 18-2-2009, thisTribunal on the same day passed the following Award .
AWARD
This is a reference made under Section 10( 1 ) (d) of Industrial Disputes Act challenging the proposal of management company to curtail privilege leave and postponement ofannual increment in the event ofunauthorised absence or attendance falling short of240 days .
2. Though the parties entered appearance and filed their pleadings when the matter came up for evidence the union is remaining absent continuously and the courtsel for the union is seeking time continuously. It appears that there is a Bipartite Settlement after the proposed change in the sevice conditions . Since the union does not show interest in prosecuting the reference it has to be presumed that there is no existing dispute for adjudication. The referencewas made in 2004. There is no meaning in keeping the Industrial Dispute pending indefinitely . The management has produced 5 documents which are marked asExts . M1 to M5 .
In the result an award is passed finding that the proposal ofthe management to curtail privilege leave and postpone annual increment in the event of unauthorised absence or attendance falling short of 240 days iš legal and justified and the employees are not entitled for any relief.
The award will come into force one month after its publication in the official gazette.
Dictated to the Personal Assistant, transcribed and typed by her, corrected and passed by me on this the 18thday of February, 2009,
P.L. NORBERT, Presiding Officer Appendix
Nil
:
Witness for Workman
Nil Witnesses for Management :
NIL Exhibit for the Workamn :
Exhibits for the Management
MI : Memorandum of Settlement duted 17-11-2003.
M2 : Notice dated31-5-1996.
M3 : Notice dated 18-11-1996.
M4 : Memorandum of Settlement dated 21-06-1996.
M5 : StandingOrder.
1508
THE GAZETTEOF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 25 फरवरी, 2009
sub-section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A) ofSection 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputé for adjudication to this Tribunal :
का.आ. 771.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंचतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय -1 , धनबाद के पंचाट (सदर्भ सं. 83/1994 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-2-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
"Whether the demand ofthe union for regularisation ofthe services of Shri Rajendra Prasad Singh and 173 other (as per attached annexure ) with the management ofBhowra Coke Plant of M/s. B.C.C.L. isjustified? If so , to what relief are the concerned worlensen entitled ?"
[सं. एल-20012/414/1993 - आईआर (सी-1 ) ]
स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी
NewDelhi, the 25th February, 2009
2. The written statement has been filed on behalfof the workman stating therein that the concerned workmen were engaged by the management of Bhowra Coke Plant for doingmiscellaneous job which was directly related for the production ofthe coke and the concerned workmen wereworking there regularly. In the year 1971 the Bhowra Coke Plant was nationalised. The employer of Bhowra CokePlant challenged the Ordinance of the President before the Hon'ble High Court, Calcutta and the Hon'ble High Court appointed a receiver pending the disposal of the writ petition and the receiver was the Retired Justice ofthe Calcutta High Court.
S.O. 771. In pursuance of Section 17 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 83/1994) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, No. I, Dhanbadnow as shown in the Annexure in Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . B.C.C.L. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 25-2-2009.
[No. L-20012/414/1993- IR(C-I )] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1 , DHANBAD
In the matter of a reference:U/s , 10 ( 1 )(d) (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act
REFERENCE No. 83 of1994
Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Bhowra Colliery of M/s . B. C. C. L.
AND
Their workmen
Present: Shri H.M. Singh, Presiding Officer.
APPEARANCIS
Forthe Employers : Shri D.K. Choubey, Advocate.
For the workman
: Shri P.N. Giri, Advocate.
State : Jharkhand.
Industry: Coal
Dated, the 17th February, 2009
Award
By Order No. L-20012/414/ 1993 - IR( C- I ) dated 8-4-94 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of
Inthe year 1983 the Hon'ble Supreme Court declared the Nationalisation of the Coke Oven Plant of Bhowra Coke Plant as valid and legal and since then the Plant is under control ofBhowra Colliery ofM/ s . BCCL. Thereafter the management of BCCL regularised the services of the workmen who were working in Bhowra Coke Plant . The workmen concerned were working as contractor workers inBhowra Coke Plant and in the year 1978 the management ofBhowra Coke Plant issued a letter stating the in that all the contractor workers will be regularised as piece rated workmen and the contract system will be abolished with effect from 27th August, 1978 and since then the workmen concernedworking there as piece rated workers of Bhowra Coke Plant. At the time ofregularisation ofthe workers of Bhowra Coke Plant the management of BCCL constituted a screening committtee and all the concerned workmen were interviewed by the Screening Committee but the concerned workmen were not regularised for the reasons best known to the management . After the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court the receiver handed over the managment ofBhowra Coke Plant to M/s . BCCL alongwith entire records including the list of workers who were working at that time in Bhowra Coke Plant . As per Nationlisation Act all the concerned workmen were entitled tobe regularised in the services of BCCL. The concerned workmen were employed by the management of Bhowra CokePlant through their Contractor and in the year 1978 the Bhowra Coke Plant Management regularised the services ofall contractor workers as the contract system has been abolished . Non -regularisation of the services of the concerned workmen is illegal and illegal retrenchment wheih was challenged by the different unions and the 1509 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
management of BCCL also gave assurance to the Union representative that the matter will be examined and proper action would be taken , but the managerment had not done anything. Seeing no other alternative the union raisedthe present industrial dispute before the A- L . C. (C) for conciliation. The Hon'ble High Court, Patna also directed the office oftheA.L.C. (C) vide their order dated 24-3-93 in C.W.J.C. No. 313 of 1993 (R) for doing needful for adjudication of this dispute . The demand of the union for regularisation ofthe services ofS/Shri Rajendra Prasad Singh and 173 others was examined by the ALC( C), Dhanbad and upon his report the present dispute has been referred to this Tribunal . It has been prayed that the Tribunal bepleased to answer the reference in favour of theworkmen by directing the managment to regularise the service of S/Shri Rajendra Pd . Singh and 173 others after being reinstated with full back wages .
3. Written statement has been filed on behalf ofthe management stating therein that the present reference is not legally maintainable and there is employer -employee relationship between the management and the concerned persons . The management of Bhowra Coke Plant was to taken over by the custodian w.e.f. 17-10-1971 in pursuance of take over of management of Coking Coal Mines Ordinance 1971 which was replaced by Coking Coal Mines Taking over ofManagement Act 1971. The aforesaid Coke Plantwas to be nationalised w.e.f. 1-5-1972 as per Coking CoalMines Nationalisation Act, 1972. The Private owners ofBhowra Coke Plant initiated series oflitigations in which the Central Government as well as the Coustodian were prevented from taking over possession of the said coke. Plant and ultimately the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court appointed a receiver for the purpose of management, control, direction and supervision of the coke plant. A retired Judge of the Hon'ble Caluctta High Court was appointed as a Receiver in this connetion . The litigation continued upto 1983 between erstwhile owners of Bhowra Coke Plant and M/ s BCCL and ultimately in 1983 the Hon'ble Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Coking CoalMines Nationalisation Act, 1972 in respect of nationalisation of Bhowra Coke Plant w.e.f. 1-5-1972 .
as such the concerned persons were not taken on roll of the present management. The concerned workmen through their union, nemely, Akhil Bharatiya Koyla Kamgar Union made a demand before the A.L.C. (C) , Dhanbad on 30-12-92 for their absorption under the present management asserting that they were working as contractor workers at Bhowra Coke Plant for several years in the pastduring the period when the coke plant was under the management of the Receiver appointed by the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court. It has been stated that a contractor worker is not entitled for his absorption under the principal employer under the provisions of Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition ) Act, 1970. The contract labour was also not entitled to claim for employment under the present management after the nationalisation ofthe Coking CoalMines and the Coke Oven Plant under the provision ofSection 17 (1 ) ofthe Coking Coal Mines Nationalisation Act, 1972. It has been submitted that as per the provision ofSec. 17 of the Coking coal Mines Nationalisation Act 1972every person who was a workman within the meaning ofIndustrial Disputes Act, 1947 and / or immediately before the appointed day in the employment ofCoking Coal Mines or Coke Oven Plant was entitled to become , on and from theappointed day, an employee of the Central Government or the Government Company in which the right, tilte and interest of such mine or plant vested under this.Act. He wasto hold office of service in the Coking Coal Mines or Coke Oven Plant, as the case may be , on the same terms. and conditions and with the same rights to Pension , Gratuity and ether matters as would have been admissible to him ifthe right in relation to such Coking Coal Mines or Coke Oven Plant had not been transferred to and vested in the Central Government or Government Company. In pursuance of the aforesaid provision of Sec . 17 of the Coking Coal Mines Nationalisation Act, 1972, the workmen whowere in service immediately before 1-5-1972 as well as on the date oftake over of management of Bhowra Coke Plant in 1983 were allowed to continue in the employment . The workmen, who were working under contractors prior to take over of the management of Coking Coal Mines or. Coke Oven Plants were treated as contractor workers and theywere nottaken over by the management of M/S. BCCL as the service conditions existing before in respect of those workman of contractors continued to be same even after nationalisation. It has been submitted that Coking Coal MinesNationalisation Laws (Amendment) Act 1986 came into force w.e.f. 15-12-1986 on which date the said Amendment Act received the assent of the President of India.As per the provisions ofSection 6 ofthe Coal Mines Nationlisation Laws (Amendment) Act , 1986 the provisions of Sec. 17 of the Act as existed before got retrospectively repealed w.e.f. 1-5-1972 and in its place the new provision was substituted enabling the management to transfer the workmen and the officers from oneplace to another place and declaring that such transfer cannot be challenged in any Court; Tribunal or other After pronouncement of the judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court in 1983 the possession of Bhowra Coke Plant was handed over to the present management. The. present management after taking over of possession of Bhowra Coke Plant constituted a Secreening Committee for screening out workman who were on the permanent roll of the Bhowra Coke Plant and after proper screening the genuine workmen were allowed to continue in the employment of Bhowra Coke Plant under the present management. Rajendra Prasad Singh and 173 others as mentioned in the annexure to the schedule of reference were not on the roll of the Coke Plant on 1-5-1972 or at the time of taking over possession of Coke Plant in 1983 and 1510
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 24, 2009/GMAITRA 7, 1931
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]
service ofM/S .BCCL. Hence, it has been prayed that the award be passed in favour ofthe management.
4. Rejoinder to the written 'statement of the menagsusent has boon filed on behalf of the concerned worlumen stating therein the same and similar fact as has bean stated in their written statement.
5. The conserned workman has produced WW- I D.N. Sidlin, who has proved Exts . W- 1 to W- 1 /4 series, WW- 1 Suresh Singh, concarned workman also examined himselfto suppast their case and WW-3 - Rajendra Prasad Singh, contractor has been produced to substantiate the cate ofthewerkman.
The management has produced MW-1 - B. K. Singh to substantiate the case of the management.
authorities . Inpursuance of the Amendment Act of 1986 referredabove, the workmen who were already taken over under the provisions ofSec. 17 of the Colring Coal Mines NationalisationAct were protected in pursuance of saving clause incorporated at Section 20 ofthe AmendmentAct and all claims of worlanen oferstwhile, employers whe were not taken over by M/S . BCCL got extinguished retrospectively w.e.f. 1-5-1972, In view of the aforesaid amendment , the concerned persons onacnot make any claim for their absorption under the present management even ifthey were genuine worlanes directly employed by the erstwhile employer ofBhowa Coke Plant. The present demand advanced by the comourned persons asserting themselves to be contractor workers of erstwhile employers cannot be maintainable. It has been stated that in a refererice the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.2, Dhanbad passed an Award in Referense No. 189/86holding that the provision of Sec . 17 of the CokingCoalMines Nationallestion Act got repesiodw.e.f. 15-12-1986 and not from 1-5-1972. The Hon'ble High Court of Patna Ranchi Bench heard the matter in CWJC.Ne. 747/88 (R) and held that the provision of Section 17 of CokingCoal Mines Nationalisation Act 1972 and Section 14 of the Coal Mines Nationalisation Act 1973 got repealed retrospectively w.s.f. 1-5-1972 and 1-5-1973 respectively and all rights of the werkmen oferstwhile employers for claiming employment under the management of M/ S . BCCL get extinuished and none can claim employment in future. It has been submitted that the concerned persons were not genuine workman or erstwhile employer or ofany contractor and have rained thepresent dispute in the spirit of gambling in litigation for securing employment for themselves.
In rejoinder filed by the management it has been denied that the concerned workasan wore working in M/s. Bhowra Coke Plant for doing miscellaneous jobs directly related to the production of coke regularly. It has been stated that they were not in the roll ofM/S . BCCL and they cannot be regularised under BCCL. It has also been denied that the concerned persons were working inBhowra Coke Plant as contracter workers or that Bhowra Coke Plant issued any letter for abolition of contract system and regularisation ofcontractor workers on the roll of the managerment . This scheme is based on concoction with the hope of making out a case for demanding absorption of contract workers on the roll of the management existing in 1978. It has been submitted that the Screening Committee was formed to find out the genuine workmen who were on the roll of the Bhowra Coke Plantunder the receivership and under the orstwhile employer before nationalisation and the Screening Committee was not constituted for verification of contractors workers and for their absorption under the management of BCCL . It has been denied that the concerned workmen are entitled to be regularised in the
6. The main argument on behalf ofthe workmen is that Rajendra Prand Singh and 173 others were working at Rhones Coks Plant before nationalisation and they wore wasting regularly. In this respect WW- 1 , Secretary ofAkhilBhartiyn Koyla Kamgar Union stated in cross- examination that there is work order to show that the wark was given to Rajendra Prasad Singh . His name is not included in the worlwomen. It shows that Rajendra Praand Singh's name is not included in workmen for whem, reference has been made for decision and adjudication . WW- 1 in cross -examination at page 2has stated "We have no record to show about the payment made to theworkinen. I have not gone through the Pass Book of the Contractor as to what payinent was made from the Coke Plaut . I have not gone through the bills subezitted by the contractor. I have not worked in the coke plant ever. This statement shows that there is no record for worlunas by the management. In this respect WW-2 stated in cross-examination at page 2-" I have heard that BCCL has gone under B.I.R.R. Number of areas have beca minitmisod to cut the employees also. I have also heard that effects are being made to save the company." He has also stated that no appointment letterwas givento him by Rajendra Prasad Singh under whom they were working and in this respect WW-3- Rajendra Praand Singh,, contractor, who has been produced by the workmon, stated in cross -examination at page 2 that there was no agreement with him and that ofon behalfof S.K. Roy the ex- owner of Bhowra Coke Plant for supply of labour . It shows that ex- owner, S.K.Ray has got no agreement to supply labour. This contructor used to supply the concerned workmen on piece-rated work to Bhowra Coke Plant . This falsifies the sistement of WW-3 made in the written statement of the workmen. Again WW-3 in page 2 stated that there is no letter from Justice P.K. Ghosh stopping contractworkte me nor there is any letter to show that he has assured to regularise me and my workers in the 1511
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
appreciated the evidence adduced by the parties and has not recorded a positive finding with regard to the nature ofthe job being performed by concerned workman.
Forthe aforesaid reason, I allow this writ application, set aside the impugned award passed by the Tribunal and remit the matter back to him for passing fresh award after giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to the parties . Needlessto say that the Tribunal shall record its finding as indicated hereinabove ."
employment of BCCL . This shows that this is again contrary to the statement made as regards what has been stated in written statement . Hence there is no contract for supply of labour. WW-3 again stated at page 2- " I have got no papers to show payments to the labourers . I have deposited those papers to BCCL . Ihave got no receipt to prove that I have deposited the payment sheet receipts . I have got no record to show which labour has worked how many days in a particular year. I am also one of the concerned workmen . I have got no record to show which labour has loaded how manywagons in which date . This statement shows that there is no record for payment to labourers and also he has got no record as to which labourer has worked how many days in a particular year with him at Bhowra Coke Plant, so that it may be presumed that this contractor alongwith 173 other workmen were doing the job ofpermanent nature .
The learned counsel of the workman also referred 2004( 1 ) JLJR 387 in which the Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court laid down-" Labour and Industrial Law- Regulation equal pay for equal work workmen continuously engaged on the job ofremoval ofslurry since 1974 through contractors after prohibition of contract labour, the workmen ought to be deened to be the workmen ofthe principal emplyer-Tribunal rightly held that supply ofcontract labour was a mere ruse/camouflage to evade compliance with various beneficial legislations workmen rightly held to be employees ofthe principal employer and Management directed to regularise their services . " The learned counsel ofthe workmen also referred 2005(4) JLJR 55 in which the Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court laiddown- "Labour and Industrial Law-Absorption/Regularisation- concerned workmen used to work through the contractor , now left redundant as part of a surplus workforce due to change in the nature of mining operation- there was stoppage of work and it was nobody's case that the concerned workmen worked till the date of award as and when BCCL intends to employ regular workmen , it shall give preference to those workmen, if they are otherwise found suitable, by relaxing the conditions of age and academic/technical qualification. "
7. In this respect the management's witness , MW- 1- B . K. Singh, who was working at Bhowra Coke Plant from the year 1967 stated that Bhowra Coke Plant was taken over by the management of M/ S . BCCL on 21-3-1983 . In the meantime litigation was pending in Calcutta High Court regarding takeover of the Coke Plant between BCCL and private owner , S.K. Rai ofBhowra Coke Plant. The concerned persons whose names found place inthe list of 174 persons had not worked at Bhowra Coke Plant on any point of time. During the management of private owner two contractors were engaged, namely, Jhanda Mahato and A.T. Carrying but when the case was pending before calcutta High Court, Sri S.K. Rai was appointed Receiver and at that time all the workers of the contractorwere regularised in the employment of Bhowra CokePlant. Besides the two contractors there was no other contractor in that coke plant. He has denied the fact that the concerned persons were working under the management ofBhowra Coke Plant and he was supervising theirwork.
10. The learned counsel of the management has referred Umadevi's case reported in 2006 (II ) LLJ - 722 in which the Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down the criteria for absorption/regularisation of temporary/casual/daily rated and contractual workers in regular service. But in the present case the criteria has not been fulfiled by the concerned workmen.
8. The documents which have been filed by the concerned workmen do not seems genuine and they cannot be relied on and on these documents it cannot be presumed that they have worked with the management .
Inview of the facts discussed above, I come to the conclusion that the concerned workmen are not entitled forregularisation.
11. Accordingly, I render the following award-The demand of the union for regularisation of the Services of Shri Rajendra Prasad Singh and 173 others , mentioned in the order of reference, with the management ofBhowra CokePlant of M/s . B.C.C. Ltd. is not justified and hence, the concerned workmen are not antitled to any relief.
H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer 9.The learned counsel for the workmen has referred 2003(2) JLJR page 58 in which the Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court laid down- "From perusal of the award it appears that the most crucial and pertinent question for decision before the Tribunal was whether the nature of work done bythe concerned workmen was of perennial nature or not. Without deciding the question the Tribunal proceeded on the basis that since the concerned workmen were engagedby the Contractor and they were paid their wages directly by the contractor, they were not entitled to any relief. In my opini on, the Tribunal has not correctly 1512
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii )] नईदिल्ली , 2 मार्च, 2009
Appearsaces:
FortheEmployer
: M/s. Consulta Juris, -Advocates .
:
For the Workmen
Shri Aboo Talib , Representative.
Date ofreserving the Award: 8-8-2008 .
Dateofpassing the Award : 16-1-2009 का.आ. 772. औधोगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ मौरीसिस के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , मुम्बई नं. 2 के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 105/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
AWARD
[सं. एल-12012/158/2001- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी
The matrix of the facts as culled out from the proceedings are as under :
New Delhi , the 2nd March, 2009
1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No.L-12012/ 158/2001 -IR (B- I ) dated 16th August, 2001 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :
S.O. 772. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 105/ 2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. 2 , Mumbai , as shown in the annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management ofState Bank of Mauritius , Ltd. , and their workmen , received by the Central Govemment on 2-3-2009.
"Whether the action ofthe management of State Bank of Mauritius Limited, Mumbai in terminating the services of Smt. Dimple Wasan w.e.f. 17.3.2000 is justified? If not, what reliefthe workman, Smt . Dimple Wasan, is entitled ?"
[No. L- 12012/ 158/2001 - IR (B- I ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
2. Claim Statement is filed by the Workman at Exhibit 7 making out the case that , she joined as a Junior Officer with the Ist Party on 8-10-1998 . She states that, though she was designated as " Junior Officer " she was performing the duties of Workman . She states that , her probationary period was extended by six months by Bank's letter dated 6-10-1999 which ended on 6th March , 2000 which was not extended thereafter .
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2, MUMBAI
PRESENT:
A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer
Reference No. CGIT-2/105 of2001
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF STATE BANK OF MAURITIUS LTD.
The Executive Vice President,
3. 2nd Party states that, she gave leave application dated 25-2-2000 and requested for maternity leave from 17-3-2000 to 14-6-2000..She states that, she was to resume on duty on 15th June, 2000 but could not do so as on that day Bank was not functioning . So it is submitted by her that, on 16th June, 2000 she reported for duty. However , she was not allowed to resume on duty . She states that she submitted application dated 12-6-2000 for maternity leave wages which was not considered by the 1st Party and she was not paid the maternity leave wages .
State Bank of Mauritius Ltd. , 101 , Raheja Centre , Free Press Journal Road , Nariman Point, Mumbai -421 001 . Mumbai -400093 .
...First Party
AND
Their Workmen
Smt. Dimple Wasan, 61-A, Woden House Road, Opp . Rustom & Co. , Colaba, Mumbai -421005.
...Second Party
4. She states that , she received letter dated 16th June, 2000 informing her that, her services have been terminated with retrospective effect from 17th March, 2000. Said termination was issued without assigning any reason for the termination of her services . She states that , she by her notice dated 8th September , 2000 requested the 1st Partyto reinstate her with full back wages and continuity of service. However, that was not considered by the Bank. She received reply from the Bank dated 30th September, 2000. In the said reply Bank levelled several allegations . According to second Party all the भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
allegations are false and Bank cannot level such allega- tions. No enquiry was conducted on such alleged charges . She states that, the decision taken by the 1st Party of termination is not just, proper and require to interfere.
(5) She further states that, though she was desig- nated as "Junior officer " she was doing the duties which were ofthe clerical nature work viz . she was doing the work ofmaintaining stationery required, maintaining leave record, preparing salary of all the Branches Units as on 2000. She states that, she was attending out door work for purchase, travelling with foreign delegation for shopping as a guide , looking after incoming and outgoing circulars tothe Branches, Developing and sending E-mails . She was taking dictations from her superiors . She was coordinat- ing with branches of the Bank for printing Bank stationary . She was maintaining inward and outward register, managing courier and dispatch . She was ordering tea/coffee for her superiors . She was looking after daily attendance and that, she was attending to the incoming calls and make STD , ISD calls. She was attending visitors . According to her , she is the workman and she is entitled forprotection.
(6) This is disputed by the 1st Party by filing reply atExhibit 8 contending that, the work done by the 2nd Party is not ofthe Workman. She cannot seek protection under the provisions ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. It is contended by the 1st Party that , she was appointed as a Junior Officer . She was initially appointed on probation for a period of 12 months . Said probation was extended as per the terms and conditions of the Bank and the Bank was entitled to terminate the services of the Workman during probation and hence the Bank took a decision to terminate her service before she completes probation since her work was not satisfactory . It is stated that, the work of the concerned workman was not upto the mark. Even initially her probationary period was extended by six months . It is stated that, 2nd Party abandoned her job on her own during the probationary period and remained absent from duty without leave from 13-3-2000 and since she abandoned her job from 13th Marcu , 2000 and since her performance was not found satisfactory. Bank terminated her services from 17-3-2000 and a formal letter informing her that, her services were terminated was communicated to her by letter dated 16th June , 2000. According to Bank the concerned Workman was doing the work of preparation of the staff salary and related reports , looking after petty cash and expenses and she was having custody of petty cash . She was looking after administrative functions like travelling arrangements for Executives from Mauritius to India . She wasmaintaining the confidential records of the staff. She was the custodian of stationery items and placing orders for stationery independently whenever required . She was attending the work of authorization of non- interest expenses e.g. courier charges , electricity charges ,
1513 telephone charges , canteen charges , canteen expenses , books and periodicals maintenance charges of Mumbai Branch . She was also supervising the work of house keeping. She was also in custody of inward and outward mails , and RBI and Corporate office's confidential circulars. It is denied by the 1st Party that, she reported for work on 16th June, 2000 and she was refused to report on duty. According to Bank she abandoned her services on 13-3-2000 hence her services were terminated from 17-3-2000 and she never reported on duty thereafter . It is stated by the 1st Party Bank that, it rece ved 2 letters dated 25-2-2000 and 12-6-2000 together on 16-6-2000. It is stated that, in the said letters she requested for sanction ofmaternity leave from 17th March, 2000 to 14th June , 2000 without any supporting documents . It is further contended by the 1st Party that, by her letter dated 12th June, 2000 she requested for payment of salary for her absence period from 17th March, 2000 which was not considered by the Bank. It is contended that , the Bank by its letter dated 16th June , 2000 , which was a formal and since she did not report on duty from 13-3-2000 , Bank treated that, she abandoned her services from 13th March , 2000. When she abandoned the job now she cannot claim any relief. So it is contended that , the claim made by the concernedworkman be rejected.
(7) Rejoinder was filed by the 2nd Party at Exhibit 16 reiterating the case made out by her in the Statement of Claim and denying the case made out by the 1st Party.
(8) In view ofthe above pleadings my Ld. Predecessor framed Issues at Exhibit 11 which 1 answer as follows :
FINDINGS ISSUES
YES 1. Whether the Management proves that Smt. Wasan is not workman as defined under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act ?
YES 2. Does the Management prove that Smt. Wasan remained absent from dutywithout leave from 13-3-2000 and thereby she abandoned her job ?
YES 3. Does Management prove that Smt . Wasan was terminated as her probationary period was not satisfactory ?
YES 4. Whether the action of the Management of State Bank of Mauritius Limited, Mumbai in terminating the services of Smt. Dimple Wasan w.e.f. 17-3-2000 is legal and justified ?
5. What relief Smt . Wasan is entitled to ?
AsperOrder passedbelow.
1514
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009CHAITRA 7 , 1931
[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii) ) REASONS:
ISSUE NO . 1 :
custody of RBI, Corporate office's confidential circulars and claimed that, she is not the workman . In the cross he states that, he has not soen 2nd Party working with Ist Party. Written arguments were filed by the 2nd Party at Exhibit 42andby the 1st Party at Exhibit43. (9) 2nd Party claims that, she is a workman. It is denied by the 1st Party . According to 1st Party she was looking after clerical work like preparation of the staff salary and work related to reports, looking after petty cash and expenses and she was having custody of petty cash doing administrative functions like travelling ar- rangements for Executives from Mauritius to India, main- taining the confidential records of the staff. She was the custodian of stationery items and was placing orders for stationery independently whenever required. She was attending the work of authorization of non- interest expenses e.g. courier charges, electricity chargentelephone charges , canteen charges , canteen expenses , books and periodicals maintenance charges of Mumbai Branch, She was also supervising the work of house keeping. It is stated that, she was also in custody of inward and out- ward mails , and RBI and Corporate office's confidential circulars and as such she was not the " Workman" .
(11) Here, 1st Party states that, the 2nd Party is not ' the workman whereas 2nd Party claims that, she is the workman. 1st Party has produced appointment letter dated 18-10-1998where she is addressed as ' Junior Officer' , State Bank ofMauritius Ltd., Mumbai . It shows the designation ofthe concerned workman which is shown as Junior Officer'. She claims that , though she is designated as "JuniorOfficer" she was made to work ofmaintenance of stationery, preparation of the staff salary and related reports, looking after petty cash and expenses , petty cash. Maintenance of the confidential records of the staff, authorization ofnon- interest expenses e.g. courier charges, electricity charges, telephone charges, canteen charges , electricity charges , canteen expenses , books and periodicals maintenance charges of Mumbai Branch , supervising the work of house keeping, she was also in custodyof inward and outward mails , and RBI and Corpo- rate office's confidential circulars . But she was not having any financial powers or any independent powers .Against thet, ist Party sueccods in showing that , the 2nd Partywas looking after petty cash and she was in the custody of the petty casli . It is the claim of the 1st Party that, she was talsing care of expenses of electrical charges, telephone changes, canteen charges etc. It is also the case of the 1st Pasty that shewas sthanding the visitors and looking after the expenditure ofthe office. So taking into consideration the designation of the Workman as Junior Officer and the work of handling petty cash and responsibility of custody of patty cash the concernedworkman does not permit her to claim as 'workmen ' and permit her to fall under the category of 'warkan' . Workman cannot handle cash or cannot purchase the stationary and cannot look after the financial coquirerpent ofthe Bank as done by the concerned workomen. Only because she is alleging that, though she was designated as ' Junior Officer' she was doing ' clerical ' work sannet be accepted unless it is proved by her. Case ofthe 1st Party is that, she was looking after petty cash as well as officeexpanses like telephone bills , electricity bills, maintenanec, canteen charges etc. independently and was purchasing stationary independently definitely fortifies theversion of the lat Party and definitely she is falling in the cadre of" Executive' and not in the cadre of the 'work- man' . So the above evidence led by both lead me to con- clude that , the 2nd Party is not the ' workman ' . So I answer this issue accordingly.
ISSUE NO . 2 :
(10) To prove that , 2nd Party placed reliance on her affidavit, filed in lieu of the examination - in - chief filedat Exhibit 34 where she states that , though she was designated as "Junior Officer" her nature of duties was entirely of pure clerical nature as she was maintaining stationery required , maintaining leave record, going for outdoor work for purchase , travelling with foreign delegations for shopping as a guide , looking after incoming and outgoing circulars to the branches , developing and sending E-mails, taking dictations from ExecutiveOfficers, coordinating with branches for printing stationery, maintaining inward and outward registers, managing courier and dispatch , ordering tea and coffee, and looking after attendance attending incoming and outgoing STD/ ISD calls . In the cross she states that, she was doing clerical work though she was designated as "Junior Officer" , She states that, she was attending 13 duties as detailed in her affidavit . As against that, management examined Sanjiv Gurudas Shirvalkar by filing hisaffidavit in lieu of the examination - in-chief at Exhibit 38 who states that, he is working as Head Operations and is familiar with the work of the 2nd Party. He states that, 2nd Party was doing work of preparation of staff salaries and related returns , looking after petty cash expenses and custody of petty cash balance and postage , looking after administrative functions , maintenance of confidential records of staff, custodian of stationery items and placing order independently for the same whenever required , authorization of non - interest expenses e.g. courier charges , electricity charges , telephone charges, canteen expenses , books and periodicals and maintenance chargesetc. of Mumbai Branch , supervising the work of house keeping , custody of inwards and outward mail. He states that , she was also maintaining and was in the
(12) It is the case of the Ist Party that, she remained absent from duty from 13th March , 2000 and hence , she abandoned her job . In fact when she is not the workman, 1515
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
ORDER
Reference is rejected with no order to its costs.
Bombay16-1-2009
A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली , 3 मार्च , 2009
का.आ. 773. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार कैंटोनमेंट बोर्ड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के भीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी-2/ 5 ऑफ 2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 03-03-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -13011/2/2001- आई आर ( डीयू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी
NewDelhi , the 3rd March, 2009 1stParty is not supposed to show all this . However, in the cross of the 1st Party which is referred above, particularly cross ofthe concerned workman reveals that, she has not lead evidence to show that , she applied and leave was granted by the 1st Party. Even she has no evidence to show that, she applied for maternity leave on 25-2-2000. She admits that, she did not produce any medical certificate along with said two leave applications. She states that she submitted medical certificate after she was discharged from the hospital on 25-3-2000. She admits that, employees like her are getting medical facilities like reim- bursement and her letter dated 12-6-2000 was admittedly for reimbursement of medical expenses . She admits that, she has not replied to the letter dated 6-10-99 ofthe Bank. So from this evidence she is unable to show that , she applied for maternity leave/medical leave in time . It does not prove that, she was on sanctioned leave. This evi- dencedoes not prove that, she applied for maternity leave. This evidence does not prove that, she informed the Bank about her maternity leave and it was sanctioned by the Bank. So all this leads me to conclude that, she remained absent voluntarily without permission or without sanc- tioned leavewhich invited Bank to treat her that , she ' aban- doned' thejob . When she has no evidence as burden is on her to show that, she was on sanctioned leave , it leads me toconclude that, she abandoned the job from 13th March , 2000. So I answer this point accordingly.
ISSUE NOS. 3 & 4:
S.O. 773. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/5 of 2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, No. 2, Mumbai, as shown in the annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cantonment Board and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 03-03-2009.
[No. L- 13011 /2/2001 -IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , DeskOfficer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI
Present: A.A. LAD , Presiding Officer
Referenece No. CGIT-2/5 of2002
Employers in Relation to the Management of Cantonment Executive Officer Cantonment Board, Pune
The Contonment Executive Officer Cantonment Board GolibarMaidan Opp . Cantonment General Hospital , Shankar Seth Road, Pune 411001 . AND
(13) It is the case ofthe 1st Party that, since she did not complete the probationary period and she remained absent she was terminated. As far as case of remaining absent without intimation and extension of probationary period ofthe 2nd Party is concerned, it is under dispute. According to her she was on maternity leave and according to Ist Party since she remained absent unauthorisedly and her probationary period which was not extended it invited 1st Party to effect termination which is proper. Here 1st Party after going through her performance during the probationary period decided not to continue her and accordingly 1st Party informed her. The fact that, the 2nd Party is unable to show that, she applied for maternity leave and after getting it sanctioned from 1st Party she proceeded on leave. All this reveals that, she did not take care of the problems ofthe 1st Party and the working of the 1st Party and have not taken care which she ought to have taken while working with 1st Party.On the contrary she did not do it and invite 1st Party to take action of termination which cannot be challenged byher in this form. So I answer this Issue to accordingly.
Their Workmen
(14) In view ofthe above discussions , I conclude that, the reference require to be rejected . Hence I pass the following order:
TheGeneral Secretary Pune Cantonment Karmachari Sangh Store Yard, JanMohammad Street, Babajan Chowk Pune411001 .
01/09-19 1516
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/ CHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART I-SEC. 3( ii )] APPEARANCES
:
Forthe employer
Mr. P.G.Hartalkar Advocate
For the workmen
: Mr. P.V. Sathaye Advocate
Mumbai , dated 27th January, 2009 .
AWARD
mother of Suresh Dadu Netke i.e. Smt. Sona Dadu Netke was declared,medically unfit w.e.f. 7-4-1993 and her name was struck off from the muster roll of establishasent of first party. It is further stated that the condition of her family cannot be called as indigent since Smt . Sona, Dadu Netke is getting monthly pension and the other son is working as Safai Karmachari with the mard and getting monthly salary. Ciscular dated09-10-1998 indicates specific directions for appointinants on compassionate grounds . As per said circular, son of Smt . Sona Dadu Netke is not entitled to gat employment with first party. So it is prayed that, prayer prayedby union be rejected.
5. Second party filed rejoinder at Ex-31 taking the same stund taken in the claim statement.
TheGovernment of India, Ministry ofLabour by its Under No.L-13011/2/2001 -IR( DU) dated20-11-2001 in exer- cise of the powers conferred be clause (d) of sub-section (1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of etion 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have refer the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
6.Inview ofabove pleadings , issues were framed at
Ex-46.which is answered as follows:
Issues
Findings
(1 ) Whether Shri Suresh
"Whether the demand of the Pune Cantt . Karmachari Sangh , Pune that Sh . Suresh Dadu Netke son ofSmt. SonaDaduNetke being the nort kin of an ex-employee ofthe Cantonment Board , Pune retired/died be given preference in providing employment under clause 7 of the settlement dated 1-10-65 is legal andjusti- fied? If yes , then to what relief the concerned per- son is entitled to and from which date?"
No
Dedu Netke son of Smt. Sona Dadu Netkebeing the next kin of an ex -employee ofCantonmentBoard can claim amployment under Clause 7 of Settlement dated 1-10-1965 with first party?
(li) What order?
As per order
below.
REASONS
IssueNo. 1:
2. To justify the claim in the reference, second party filed claim statement at Ex- 15 -A making out case that, settlement took place in 1965. As per said settlement, one of the heirs of the workman can be accommodated in the employment of first party on compassionate ground. As per said settlement Suresh Dadu Netke son of Smt . Sens Dadu Netke is entitled to get employment with first party . Smt . Sona Dadu Netke was working as Safaiwala with first party and she was discharged from service on 7-4-1993 as declared medically unfit . Accordingly Smt . Sona Dadu Netke submitted application on 15-04-1993to first party and requested to take her son Suresh Dadu Netke in the employment in her place . However he was not considered. So dispute was raised by union by approachingAssistant Labour Commissioner (C) which ended in failure.
3. It is case of the union that, Suresh Dadu Netke son ofSmt. SonaDaduNetke ought to have called for interview and first party ought to have verified his credentials for but he was not considered. So it is prayed that, he be appointed as a Sefalwala with immediateeffect.
7. To justify the demand, second partydid not lead any evidence. Against that, first party has filed affidavit of ope Athe Subast Beglene Ex-65 making out case that, son of ant, Sona Dedu Natke is not entitled for employment with her party. Though mateimatter was kept for cross- exami- nation of the wingas , nobody appeared for second party to take the cross-examination of first party witness. Aver- ments made by flest party in the affidavit remained unchal- langed. Besides no evidence is lead by claiment to justify the claim. No anyword is usteredby second partyby step- ping into witness box. So I conclude that , second party falind to stablish that , Suresh Dadu Netke son of Smt. Sene Dede Netke is entitled for employment with first party. So I enewer this issue in the negative and passss following onder:
ORDER
Reference is rejectedwith no order as to its costs.
Date:27-01-2009
4. This is disputed by first party by filing reply at Ex-20 -A stating that , General Secretary of union has no locus - standi to file claim statement . Said union is not party to the terms of settlement . This Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the claim. It is further stated that, settlement took place as there was no statutory provisions about the recruitment of employees and service conditions with first party . It is stated that
A. A. LAD, PresidingOfficer 1517 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ] .
AWARD
नई दिल्ली , 3 मार्च , 2009
TheGovernment of India in the Ministry ofLabour, in exercise ofPowers conferredby Clause (d) of sub - section (1) and sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 (14 of 1947) have referred the following dispute for adjudication vide their Order No. L-42011 /50/ 2000/IR(DU), dated27-12-2000.
का.आ 774. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आर्चलॉजिकल सर्वे ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 87/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
सं. एल-42011/50/2000- आई आर( डी.यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डैस्क अधिकारी
"Whether the action of the management of Archeological Survey of India , Bhubaneswar, by not giving temporary status to casual workers thosewho have fulfilled the criteria for temporary status is justified ? If not, to what relief the workmen are entitled ?"
New Delhi , the 3rd March, 2009
S.O. 774. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 87/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court, Birabaneshwar as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Archeological Survey of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on3-3-2009.
2. Pursuant to a judgement dated 16-2-1990 of the Central Administrative Tribunal , Principal Bench, New Delhi in the case of Shri Raj Kamal & Others-Versus-Union of India the Government of India, Department of Personnel& Training (DoPT) came up with a scheme for conferment of temporary status and regularization of casual Labour in.. 1993. Under the said scheme the Management conferred temporary status to several casual labourers leaving aside few such senior casual workers . Their Union therefore raised an Industrial Dispute culminating the same in the present reference ..
[No. L-42011 /50/2000- IR (DU)] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
3. It is alleged in short , by the Union that by misinterpreting the provisions of the scheme the Management has deprived several senior labourers from its benefit and thereby has created disparity amongst the workers.
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR
Present: Shri N. K. R. Mohapatra , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute Case No. 87/2001
DateofPassing Award- 16th January , 2009
Between:
The Management of the Superintendent, Archeological , Archeological Survey of India, Bhubaneswar Circle , Old Town , Bhubaneswar - 02.
.....First Party Management
AND
4. The Management on the other hand contended that as per the Scheme and circulars issued by the DoPT casual labourers who were in continuous service of at least one year have already been given temporary status as per the scheme and paid their arrears from the effective dates . But those who were not recruited through employment exchange could not be coriferred with such status , the Government rule/circular being specific on the same . In other words it is contended by the Management that persons recruited not through employment exchange are not entitled for such temporary status and as such no illegality has been committed by the Management is not conferring temporary status to those in respect of whom the dispute was raisedby the Union.
Their Workmen represented through the General Secrotary, Archeological Survey of India , Workers Union , Barabati Fort, Cuttack-753 001 .
5. On the basis of above pleadings of the parties the following issues were framed.
..... 2nd Party- Union
ISSUES
APPEARANCES :
1.Whether the reference is maintainable?
.... For the Ist Party
Shri B. K. Mohapatra
Management.
Administrative Officer.
For the 2nd Party
Shri Ajay Kr . Patthaik,
Union.
2. Wheather the action of the Management of Archeological Survey of India, Bhubaneswar, by not giving temporary status to casual workers those who have fulfilled General Secretary.
1518
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART I-SEC. 3(ii)] the criteria for temporary status isjustified? If not,towhat reliefthe workmen are entitled?
3. To what relief the worlonen are entitled to?
6. The Union examined two witnesses who have been. deprived ofbeing conferred with temporary status . It also produced several documents marked as Ext . - 1 to 6. The Management on the other hand examined one witness and produceddocuments marked as Ext . -A to D.
FINDINGS
ISSUE NO.1
7.No evidence worth any kind having been adduced by either party, this issue is answered affirmatively.
ISSUES NO . 2 AND 3
8. These Issues are taken up together as they are inter-dependant.
Rule-4 of the Scheme ( Ext. - A) prescribes as follows:-
TesaporaryStatus
(Ext. -C) between Union of Indie-Versus-Mohanlal etc. came tohold that the Scheme of 1993 is not an ongoing scheme and temporarystatus can be conferred on casual labourers under that scheme only on fulfilling the conditions incerpented in eleuse 4 of the scheme , namely they should have beon casual labourers in employment as on the date of commencement of the scheme and they should have rendered continuous service of at least one year . In an carlier case between Passport Officer, Trivendrum & Others-Versus-Venugopal C& Others the Hon'ble Supreme Courthave observed that if the Department decides that only such employees who are recruited in normal manner through the employment exchange shall be given temporary status, no fault can be found with the Department. In the above light the DoPT in its Office Memorandum No. 49014/2/93 dated 12-7-1994 has clarified with reference to its earlierO.M. No. 51016/2/90 dated 10-9-1993 that since it is mandatory to engage casual employees through employment exchange , the appointment of casual employees without employinent exchange is irregular. Hence, such casual employees can not be bestowed with temporary status , Since in their evidence the Union witness have categorically admitted that they were not recruited through employment exchange, that itself is sufficient to saythat they have got to no right to claim temporary status under the scheme. Accordingly I find no merit in the claim oftheUnion.
10.The reference is answered accordingly on contest.
N. K. R. MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer Temporary status wouldbe conferred on all casual labourers who are in employment on the date of issues of this O.M. and who have rendered a continuous service ofat-least one year , which means that they musthave boen engaged for a period ofat least 240 days (206 days in the case of offices observing 5 days week) .
LIST OF WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF THE 2ND PARTY-UNION
W.W. -1- Shri Ajaya Kumar Pattnaik.
(ii) Such conferment of temporary status would be without reference to the creation/availability ofregular Group 'D' posts.
W.W.-2- Shri Kanhei Bhoi .
LIST OF DOCUMENTS EXHIBITED ON BEHALF OF THE 2ND PARTY -UNION
Ext. - 1- Copy of DoPT O.M. No. 51016 /2 / 90 - Estt . (C)dated10-9-1993
(m) Conferment of temporary status on a casual labourer would not involve any change in his duties and responsibilities. the engagement will be on daily rates of pay on need basis . He may be deployed any where within the recruitment unit/ territorial circle on the basis of availability ofwork.
Ext.2- Copy of letter No..F.13/24/2002- Admn . II dated 16-8-2002 issued by the Director, ASI , New Delhi .
Ext -3- Copy of the letter issued by the Director, DoPT dated 6-6-2002.
Ext-4- Copy of letter No 77 /2 /XII /03 - CC , dated 31-10-2003 issued by the Suprintending Archaeo- logist, ASI , Bhubaneswar.
(iv) Such casual labourers who acquire temporary status will not however, be brought on to the permanent establishment unless they are selected through regular selection process for Group 'D' Pests .
Ext-5- Copy of Memorandum of Settlement dated 18-10-2004.
9. The above rule no doubt impose ne restriction for conferment of tamsperary status to thosewho had not been recruited through employment exchange . But while interpreting the said rule the Hon'ble Supreme Court in their common Judgement in Civil Appeal No. 3168/2002
Ext-6- Copy of letter No. 35/ CIFA/Estt ./96-3846(21 ), dated 8-11-1996 issuedby the Administrative Officer, CIFA, Bhubaneswar .
1519
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]
AND THEIR WORKMEN LIST OF WITNESSES EXHIBITED ON BEHALF OF THE 1ST PARTY- MANAGEMENT
TheGeneral Secretary
M.W.- 1- Shri Madan Mohan Mishra .
Pune Cantonment Karmachari Sangh Store Yard
JanMohammad Street Babajan Chowk,
Pune-411001 .
LIST OF DOCUMENTS EXHIBITED ON BEHALF OF THE 1ST PARTY - MANAGEMENT
Appearances:
Ext. -A-Circular ofthe Government ofIndia, Archeological Surveyof India.
Mr.P.G. Hartalkar
For the Employer
Ext. -B-Clarification issued by the DoPT.
Advocate
Forthe Workmen
Mr. P.V. Sathaye Ext. -C-Judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India C.A. No. 3168 of2002.
Advocate Ext. -D-Circular ofDoPT.
Mumbai , dated 27th January, 2009.
AWARD
नई दिल्ली , 3 मार्च, 2009
TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour, by its Order No. L- 13011 /5 /2001 /IR( DU ) dated 23-11-2001 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
का.आ 775. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार कैंटोन्मेन्ट बोर्ड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध मेंनिर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम म्यायालय नं. मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीपीआईटी -2/4 ऑफ 2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था। :
[सं. एल-13011/5/2001- आई आर ( डीयू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 3rd March, 2009
"Whether the demand of the Pune Cantt. Karmachari Sangh , Pune that Sh. Prakash Gurayya, son of Shri Rayappa Gurayya being the next kin of an ex-employee of the Cantt. Board, Pune retired/died be given preference inproviding employment under clause 7 ofthe settlement dated 1-10-65 is legal and justified? Ifyes, then to what relief the concerned person is entitled to and from which date ?" S.O. 775. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes,Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.CGIT-2/ 4 of2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, No. II Mumbai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation tothe managernment of Cantonment Board and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 3-3-2009.
[No. L- 13011 /5/2001 - IR (DU)]
SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI
2. To justify the claim in the reference , second party filed claim statement at Ex- 11 -A-making out case that, settlement took place in 1965. As per said settlement, one ofthe heirs of the workman can be accommodated in the employment of first party on compassionate ground. As per said settlement Sh . Prakash Gurayya, son of Shri Rayappa Gurayya is entitled to get employment with first party. Shri Rayappa Gurayya was working as Safai Karmachari with first party and he was discharged from service on 26-11-1991 as declared medically unfit . Accordingly Shri Rayappa Gurayya father of Prakash Gurayya submitted application on 16-12-1991 to first party and requested to take his son in the employment in his.. place. However he was not considered. So dispute was raised by union by approaching ALC. (C) which ended in. failure.
PRESENT : A. A. Lad, Presiding Officer
Reference No. CGIT- 2/4 of 2002
Employers inRelation to The Managementof Cantonment Executive Officer Cantonment Board, Pune
3. It is case ofthe union that, Prakash Gurayya son of Rayappa Gurayya ought to have called for interview and ought to have verified his credentials for but he was not considered. So it is prayed that, he be appointed as a Safaiwalawith immediate effect.
4. This is disputed by first party by filing reply at Ex- 16-A stating that, General Secretary of union has no The Contonment Executive Officer Cantonment Board GolibarMaidan Opp . Cantonment General Hospital Shankar Seth Road, Pune 411001.
1520
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART II SEC. 3 ( i )]
नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2009
का.आ 776 अधिनियम 1947 (1947 का 14 ) द्रीनार एवं बीचमा रीवर बोर्ड, शिपिता के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकेभीत्र में निधिगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक अधिकरण , लखनऊ के पंचाट (रेफरेंस संकथा 21/2003 ) को प्रकासित करती है, को केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-3-2009 को प्रक्रय हुआ था।
[सं. एल-42012/201/2002- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी locan-standi to file claim statement. Suid'union is not party tothe terms ofsettlement. This Court has nojurisdictionto entertainthe claim. It is further stuted thes, settlement took place as there was no statutory provisions about the recruitment of employees and service conditions with first party. It is stated that father of Prakash Gurayya i.e. RayappaGurayya was declared asedically unfit w.e.f. 26-11-1991 and his name was struck off from the muster roll ofestablishment of first party. Since Rayeppa Gurayya retired on medical ground, his eam is not entitledto appointment on compassionate ground. Crouler dated 09-10-1998 indicates specific rules for recruitment and benefits to workers . As per said ciramaten, aan of Rayappa Gurayya isis not entitled to get punhygrant with first party. So it is prayed that , prayer pinyed by ionbe rejected.
New Delhi , the 5thMarch, 2009
5. Second party filed rejoinder at Ex-33 taking the same stand taken in the claim staternent .
6. Inview ofabove pleadings issues were framodat Ex-48 which are annwered as follows:
Issues
Findings
No.
S.O. 776.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Contrat to publikes them . 21/2003 d-cum-Labour Comt, Landarewas dispute between CivilWorks Central danmure in the industrial of thoi den, esived by the 1 Gourmet on 5-3-2009.
[No. L-42012/201 /2002-IR( CM- II )] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer (1) Whether Prakash Gurayya S/o RayappaGurayya being the next kin an ex- employee of Cantonment Board can claim employment under Clause 7 of Settlement dated 1-10-1965with first party?
ANNEXERE
(ii) What order ?
Asperorder below.
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TROVICAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW REASONS
Present : Shri N.K. Purohit, Presiding Officer IssueNo. 1:
I. D. NO. 21/2003
Ref. No. L-43812/201/2002- IR(CM - II) Dinted : 28-1-2003
BETWEEN:
Shri Anmbika Praand, State General Secretary BhartiyaMazdoor Sangh , Uttar Pradesh 2,NaveenMarket Kanpur (U.P. )-208001 (Tiaphuming tube of Shri Arjun Singh)
AND
1.TheChiefEngineer
7. Tojustify the demand, second party did not lead anyevidence.Against that, first party has filed affidavit of oneAsha Subash Baglane Ex-67 making out case that, son of Rayappa Gurayya is not entitled for employment with first party. Though matter was kept for cross-examination ofthis witness , nobody appeared for second partytotake the cross-examination of first party's witness . Averments madeby first party in the affidavit remained unchallenged. Besides no evidence is lead by claimant to justifythe claim. No anyword is uttered by second party by stepping into witness box. So I conclude that , second party failed to establish that, Prakash Gurayya Son of Rayappa Gurayya is entitled for employment with first party. So I answer this issue in the negative and passes following order:
ORDER
Betwa Riumbe Nandanpura Colony Jhansi.
Reference is rejected with no order as to its costs.
Dated: 27-01-2009
2.TheExecutive Engineer
CivilWada Division
Rajghat
Lalitpur(U.P. )
A. A. Lad, Presiding Officer 1521
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
AWARD
19-02-2009
to 23-3-2004, but the management illegally and arbitrarily passed the impugned order dated 25-8-2001 whereby the workman was retired we.f. 30-97001 (4/N) prior to attainment of his age of superammation . Accordingly the workman has prayed that the impugned order dated 29-8- 2001 be quashed and direct the management to treat him in servicewith all consequential benefits .
1. By order No. L-42012 /201 / 2002 - IR( CM - II ) dated: 28-1-2003 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, New Delhi in execise of powers conferred by clausé (d) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub -section (2A) of Section 10ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute between Shri Ambika Prasad, State General Secretary, Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh, Uttar Pradesh; 2, Naveen Market, Kanpur (Espousing case of Shri Arjun Singh ) and the Chief Engineer, Betwa River Board, Nandanpura Colony, Jhansi & the Executive Engineer, Civil Works Division , Rajghat , Lalitpur for adjudication.
2. The reference under adjudication is:
" क्या चीफ इंजीनियर , बेतवा रिवर बोर्ड, झाँसी द्वारा श्री' अर्जुन सिंह पुत्र श्री लघु को दिनांक 30-09-2001 के अपरान्ह से 60 वर्ष की आयु मानकर सेवानिवृत्त कर दिया जाना न्यायोचित् है ? यदि. नहीं, तो संबोधित कर्मकार किस अनुतोष का हकदार है ? "
3. The admitted case of the parties is that the workman Arjun Singh was appointed on the post of Chowkidar with the opposite parties. The workman being illiterate had no documentary proof in support of his age and accordingly submitted his Horoscope to cater the need. Later at the instance of the management the workman appearedbefore Chief Medical Officer for assessment of his age andthe CMO, Lalitpur vide his certificate dated 23-3-1994, assessed workman's age as 48 years on 23-3-1994.
5. The Management of Betwa River Board has disputed the claim of the workman that his age on the basis ofcertificatedated 23-3-1994 ofthe CMO was entered into his service records , as the said examination before CMO was not carried out in presence of any officer of the department. Accordingly when at the time ofretirement his age to be48 years was found on his service book without any counter signature of any Competent Authority then on basis of doubt, the workman was directed to appear beforeMedicalBoard , Jhansi for assessment ofhis age in presence ofaGazetted Officer of the department and the ageofthe workman in the said assessment was declaredto be60 on29-9-2001 vide their certificate dated29-9-2001 .It has been submitted that the management that after assessment of the age of the workman to be 60 years by theMedicalBoard on 29-9-2001 , he was issued retirement notice dated29-9-2001 and accordingly he was retired on 30-9-2001. (A/N ) and there is no illegality in its as the certificate issued by Medical Board, supersedes all other certificates issued by inferior bodies. The management has also pointed out that the age of the workman , in the seniority list, has been mentioned on the basis of certificate issued by CMO which stands cancelled after issuance of certificateby the Medical Board accordingly the workman is not supposed to be entitled for any relaxation for said mention in the seniority list. Accordingly the management has prayed that the claim of the workman be rejected out rightlywithout any reliefwhatsoever.
6.Theworkman has filed rejoinder and has not uttered anything new apart from reiterating the facts already stated by him in the statement of claim.
:
7. The parties have filed documentary evidence in support of their respective claim . The workman has examined himself in support his case and he was cross- examined also; whereas the management ofBetwa River Board examined Mohd. Alam , Assistant Engineer whowas not cross -examined by the workman in spite of giving opportunity although he was cross -examined bythe Court . The management produced another witness viz . Shri K.C. Sharma, Stenographer, CMO Office , Jhanel , who was cross -examinedby the workmen . The parties have forwarded oral arguments apart from written argument.
8.Heard learned representatives ofboth the parties and perused the evidence on record.
9.The learned representative on behalf ofworkamen has contendedthat the impugned order dt. 29-8-2001 has 4. As per averments of the workman the para 10.2.4 ofthe Service Rules/Manual provides that if date of birth ofan employee is incorrect then his age shall be assessed byMedicalOfficer and the age so assessed shall be entered into the service record, accordingly his age was recorded as48years in his service book, duly encircling the previous date of birth , recorded on the basis of Horoscope andhis newly assessed age was used for various purposes l.e. seniority etc. The workman has alleged that before passing the impugned order dated 29-8-2001, the Executive Engineer vide their letter dated24-8-2001 sought clarification from Superintending Enginew, Rajgahat, Bandh Circle over , the ambiguity arising due to two date ofbirth being mentioned in the service book of the workman, but no clarification was forwarded on behalf of Superintending Engineer tili date. The workman has also submitted that he as well as his Union wide their representation dated 29-8-2001 and 1-9-200 trespectively, represented against retirement notice dated 29-8-2001 , without any results . The workınan has further stated that as per assessment of his age by Cмо on 23-3-1994 as 48 years, his date of birth comes to 23-3-1946 and accordingly the date of superannuation in respect oftheworkman on attaining age of 60 years comes 1522
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 28, 2009 CHAITRA 7 , 1931
[PART IISec. 3( i) )
the report, theworkman was directed to appear,before the medical board, Jhansi. After medical examination ofthe workman, the medical board found his age 60 years as on 29-9-2001 . Themingrasant wincas Sh. K. C. Sherina, Steno has bein marmined to prove the said report dt. 29-9-2001.
14. The question thus arises for consideration is as to whether retiring the workman on 30-9-2001 on the basis ofthe repart ofthe medical board dt. 29-9-2001 , isjustified?
been passed by the management filegally and arbitrarily, whereby he was retired on 30-9-2001 peler to attainmentof his age of superannuation . He hue further contended that as per medical report of the CMO dt. 23-3-1994, the ageof the workman on the said date ise been mentioned in his service record as 48 years and on this basis, ofwhich the age oftheworkman was shown as 52years in the seniority list dt. 21-9-1999. Subsequently the managerment directed theworkman to appear before the medical board for re- medical examination for determination ofhis age. The above action of the management is sabitrary and in violation of the relevant rules in this regard. He has also referred an order issued by the U.P. Goverment's it. 20-8-1971 pertaining tothe entries of date of birth and deterraination ofage and U.P.Governmentwarum Gratuity scheme.
15. The relevant servico rules pertaining to recording ofdate ofbists have been refered in the statement ofclaim . Rule 10.2. envinnges thist in case ofilleterate workman, he should be required to produce some documentary evilmos, ifamiletite for example an extract from Municipal birth register,Beptional certificate etc. where no such proof is available, the wesker on entering service, should declare his date ofbirth which should not differ from any declaration enybesond or impliesitnade for any public purpose before entering into service in Board. Similarly, Rule 10.2.4 envienges that whare the person concerned is unable to state his age or the kagje stated by him is obviouslyincorrect, it shouldbe got assessed by the Medical Officer.
10. Per contra, the learned representative on behalf ofthe opposite party has urged that at the time ofmedical examination of the workman on 23-3-1994, none was present on behalfof the department. On perusal of service record oftheworkman, it reveals that there was no counter signature of any competent authority with regard to enteries of age mentioned on the basis ofthe report ofthe CMO as such it created doubt and the worknian was directed to appear before the inedical board, Jhansi for determination of his age in presence ofa gazetted officer ofthe department and on the basis ofthe medical report of theBoard consisting of 5 docters, the impugned order of the retirement has been passed considering his age to be 60years as on29-9-2001 . He has albo urged that there isno illegality in the order as certificate issued by the medical board supercedes the certificateof age issued by the CMO. Hehas also relied on (2000) 8 SCC 696 GM, Bharat Cooking Coal Ltd. vs. Shib Kumar Dushed and others in support of his contention ,
11. I have given my thoughtful consideration on submission given by both sides .
16.A copy oftheU.P. Government EmployeeGratuity Scheme time also been placed on record, which envisages that for the purpose ofdetermining age , the date ofbirth of aworkman shall be the date given in the High School certificate in absence of above as entered in the Provident Fund reoord and in absence of both then as estimated by the Civil Burgeon: Above proviston in the scheme are relevant fie dermistion of age in the metter pertainingto Gratuity. A copy of letterdt. 20-8-1971 issuedby the Commissioner and Secretarty, U.P. Government to all head of the departments is alap on the record which envisages that where the date of birth recorded in service book, which has been attested and stood unchallanged for a number of years, it should not be altered except in very exceptional circumstances .
< 12. The workman has stated that he was appointed asChowkidar on 3-12-1980 and his date ofbirth 5-9-1941 was entered in his service record as per the Horoscope submitted by him. He has further stated that he was directed to appear before the CMO, Lalitpur for determination of his age vide letter dt. 21-3-1994 and ne per the report ofthe CMO his agewas 48 years in the year 1994. He has also stated that his age was shown 52 years in the seniority list dt . 21-9-1999 on the basis of said report. He has alleged that he was to be retired in the year 2006 , whereas he had bean retired in the year 2001 on the basle of report of the medical board dt. 29-9-2001 .
17. In prosent case , admittedly, the workman was illeterate at this date ofbirth 5-9-1941 was mention in his servite robbed on the basis ofhis Horoscope submitted by him. The copter ofthe service book and Horoscope is on the record. Prom the perusal of the above, it appears that as per letter of the CMO dt. 23-3-1994, the age of the workman has been mentioned in his service record as 48 years inciroling the eartier date ofbirth 5-9-1941 mentioned on the bhate ofHerescope . But above endorsement was not counter algned by any competent authority.Moreover, this endorsement has been made after 53 years from the your ofhis onciring in service. It is evident from the record fat theweltman has not challenged his date of birth i.e. 5-9-1942 mettionedion the basis ofhis Horoscope. He had never queuelated the genuineness ofthe Horoscope.After medicalaloriamination of the workman by the medical board nolating of doctors , the report dt . 29-9-2001.has been submitted whole the age of the workman was found tobe 13. In rebuttal , the management witness Mohd .Alam, Assistant Engineer has stated on oath that 5-9-1941 as date ofbirth oftheworlanan , was mentioned in his service record on the basis of his Horoscope, whereas as per the report of the CMO, Lalitpur age of the workman was48 years as on 23-3-1994. Thus , on being not satisfied with 1523
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. C.I.T. 54/96) of the Industrial Tribunal Jaipur now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Hindustan Copper Ltd. and their workman,which was receivedby the Central Government on 5-3-2009.
[No. L-43012/3/1996- IR (M ) ] . KAMAL BAKHRU, Desk Officer 60years inthe2001. It is pertinent to mention that there is no inconsistency in the age mentioned by the workman in his Horoscope and the age mentioned in above report of the medical board. It is not the case of the workman that his Horoscopewas not correct or his age as mentioned on the basis ofHoroscope was not correct. It is also not the case ofthe workman that there was any arithmetical or typographical error on the face of the record mentioning his age in his servicebook.
केन्द्रीय औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण , जयपुर केस नं. सी.आई.टी. 54/96
रैफरेंस : केन्द्र सरकार , श्रम मंत्रालय , नई दिल्ली का आदेश क्र. सं. एल. -43012/3/96- आई. आर. ( विविध ) दि. 13-11-96 श्री विष्णु कुमार शर्मा पुत्र श्री. रामस्वरूप शर्मा, खेतड़ी नगर (मृतक) जरिये श्री कृष्ण कुमार , होता ।
-----प्रार्थी 18.The matter, however, could have been different had the management retired the workman prior to the date of his superannuation on the basis of the date of birth mentioned in his Horoscope . But in instant case, the workman had been retired on 29-8-2001 and the date of birth initially mention in his service record was 5-9-1941 thus, on the basis of his own Horoscope he was to be retired in the year 2001 and as per medical board's report also, he was to be retired in the year 2001. The workman is now estopped from retracting his declaration ofage based onhis Horoscope at the time ofjoining service.
एग्जीक्यूटिव डायरेक्टर , हिन्दुस्तान कॉपर लि. , स्रोतड़ी कॉपर काम्पलैक्स, खेतड़ी नगर , झुंझनू ।
-----भप्रार्थी
उपस्थित
पीठासीन अधिकारी श्री गौतम प्रकाल शर्मा , आर.एच.जे.
19. Since, there was discrepancy of about 6 years in the date of birth mentioned in his service record on the basis ofworkman's Horoscope and the report of the CMO, Lalitpur and entry pertaining to report of the CMO were. not counter-signed by any competent authority, the action oftheopposite party to direct the workman to appear before the medical board for his medical re -examination for determination ofage, cannot said to be unjustified.
एस.
कोई उपस्थित नहीं
प्रार्थी की ओर से:
अप्रार्थी की ओर से:
श्री मनोज कुमार शर्मा 20. In view of the above discussions the impugned order pertainingto retirement ofthe workman Arjun Singh on 30-9-2001 considering his age as 60 years is not unjustified. Thus,the workman is not entitled for any relief.
दिनांक अवार्ड: 7-8-2008
21. The reference under adjudication is answered socordingly.
अवार्ड
22.Award as above.
Lucknow.
N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer
1. केन्द्र सरकार , श्रम मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली में उपरोक्त भाषेत से निम्न अनुसूची का विवाद इस न्यायाधिकरण को अधिनिर्णय हेतु निर्देशित किया है :
नई दिल्ली , 5 मार्च, 2009
औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947
का.आ. 777
का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार हिन्दुस्तान कॉपर लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबंद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विचार में औद्योगिक अधिकरण जयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी. आई.टी.54/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-43012/3/1996-आई आर ( एम ) ]
"Whether the action of the management of Khetri Copper Complex, Hindustan Copper Ltd. , Khetri Nagar, Dist Jhunjhunu is justified, in terminating the services of Shri Vishnu Kumar (workman) w.e.f. 30-8-92, (A/N) after employing him as Casual workonen w.e.f. 20-3-85 to 30-8-92, Intermittentlywithout giving any opportunity of employment before employing workmenjunior to him , in violation of Section 25-H ofthe I.D. Act is justified ? Ifnot, to what reliefthe workman is entitled and from what date ?" कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi , the 5th March, 2009
2. प्रार्थी श्रमिक की ओर से विवाद के समर्थन में निम्न तथ्यों कास्टेटमेंटऑफ क्लेम पेश हुआ कि श्रमिक ने अप्रार्थी नियोजक के यहां आकस्मिक श्रमिक के रूप में दिनांक 28-2-85. से कार्य करना 80.777 In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central
992 GL08-20 1524
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART IISEC. 3 ( ii) ]
गया है। यहां यह भी उल्लेख करना समुचित होगा कि रैफरेंस में प्रार्थी की अत्रार्थी के नहीं कार्य अवधि 20-3-85 से 30-8-92 दर्शाई गई है जबकि स्टेटमैंट ऑफ क्लैम में प्राथों का दिनांक 28-2-85 से 29-8-92 तक अप्रार्थी के यहां काम करना बताया गया है और इस संबंध में रैफरेंस में कोई संशोधन भी नहीं कराया गया है ।
7. प्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि उपस्थित नहीं आये अतः अप्रार्थी की बहस सुमी, पत्रावली का अवलोकन किया । प्रकरण में मेरे समक्ष निम्न बिन्दु तय करने हेतु हैं:
1. क्या प्रार्थी श्रमिक ने विपक्षी संस्थान में दिनांक 20-3-85 से आकस्मिकं श्रमिक के रूप में उसकी सेवा मुक्ति की दिनांक 30-8-92 तक निरन्तर कार्य किया ? '
2. क्या प्रार्थी की सेवा समाप्ति अधिनियम की धारा 25- एफ , जी, एच व औद्योगिक विवाद केन्द्रीय नियम, 1957 के नियम 77-78 का उल्लंघन कर की गई ?
3. क्या प्रार्थी की सेवा मुक्ति छंटनी की परिभाषा में नहीं आती और धारा 2 ( 00 ) ( बी बी ) अधिनियम के अनुसार प्रार्थी का नियोजन आरंभ व समाप्त होना था ?
4. अनुतोष ?
प्रारंभ किया जो कार्य वह 29-8-92 तक करता रहा किन्तु नियोजक ने 30-8-92 से उसे कोई कारण बताये बिना काम पर लेने से इन्कार कर दिया व सेवा से पृथक कर दिया । इस संबंध में श्रमिक ने नियोजक के यहां प्रतिवेदन भी दिया किन्तु उनके द्वारा कोई कार्यवाही नहीं की गई तब विवाद श्रमिक की ओर से सहायक श्रम आयुक्त ( केन्द्रीय ) के वहां प्रस्तुत किया किन्तु उक्त विवाद में भी समझौता नहीं होने पर इस अनुसूची का विवाद अधिनिर्णय हेतु इस अभिकरण में भेजा गया है । आगे कथन रहा है कि श्रमिक की सेवा समाप्ति क्लेम के चरण सं. 5 के पैरा ' 1 ' से वर्णित ' 6 ' के अनुसार अनुचित एवं अवैध है क्योंकि श्रमिक दिनांक 28-2-85 से 29-8-92 तक निरन्तर कार्य कर रहा था लेकिन उसने बिना कोई कारण बताये व बिना कोई जांच किये तथा बिना एक माह का नोटिस या नोटिस वेतन व छंटनी का मुआवजा दिये सेबा पृथक कर दिया जो भारा 25 एफ औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (जिसे निर्णय में आगे मात्र अधिनियम लिखा जायेगा ) का उल्लंघन है । इसी तरह से नियोजक ने प्रार्थी को सेवा से अलग करते समय नियम 77 के अनुसार आकस्मिक श्रमिकों की कोई वरिष्ठता सूची जारी नहीं की जो किया जाना अवाश्यक था । इसी तरह से प्रार्थी से कनिष्ठ श्रमिकों को पदोत्रत व स्थाई कर दिया किन्तु उससे पूर्व प्रार्थी को सेवा का कोई अवसर नहीं दिया । श्रमिक ने एकः वर्ष में 240 बिन कार्य नहीं किया तब भी नियोजक के लिए धारा 25 जी की पालना आवश्यक थी । इस तरह से अधिक की ओर से स्टेटमेंट ऑफ क्लेम रहा है कि श्रमिक की सेवा समाप्ति अधिनियम की धारा 25 एफ , जी व एच के प्रावधानों के उल्लंघन सेव नियम 77 के उल्लंघन से अनुचित व अवैध है ।
नियोजक की ओर से जवाब पेश जिसमें आरंभिक आपत्तियां, लीगई कि श्रमिक को आकस्मिक कार्यों हेतु समय - समय पर लगाया गया था एवं उक्त कार्य के पूर्ण होने पर उसकी सेवाएं स्वतः ही सम्मान करे गई थीं । इस तरह से प्रार्थी की सेवा मुक्ति छंटनी की परिभाषा में नहीं आती है और धारा 2 ( 00 ) ( चीनी ) अधिनियम के प्रावधानों के अनुसार नियोजन को प्रारंभ और समाप्त होगा था । मदवार जवाब देते हुए बताया कि प्रार्थी ने नियोजक के यहां 23-1-85 से 30-8-92 की अवधि में संविदा अनुसार समय - समय पर कार्य किया जो कार्य आकस्मिक व उपलब्ध कार्यों पर किया । प्रार्थी की सेवा समाप्ति के एक वर्ष पूर्व 240 दिन की नहीं रही । इस तरह से प्रार्थी क्योंकि संविदा स्वरूप व समय - समय पर एक निश्चित अवधि व निश्चित वेतन पर आवश्यक कार्य हेतु सेवारत था, अतः प्रार्थी के मागले में धारा -25 एफ , जी व एच अधिनियम के प्रावधानों का उल्लंघन होना महीं पाया जाता है ।
8. अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि में अपनी बहस में बताया कि प्रार्थी स्वयं ने अपने को आकस्मिक श्रमिक होना स्वीकार किया है । इसके अतिरिक्त अप्रतश्रर्थी की ओर से ऐंगेजमेंट आदेश भी पेश हुआ है अतः कार्य साधा होने की उसकी नियुक्ति समाप्त होना माना जाये । प्रार्थी की नियुक्ति ऐंगेजमेंट आर्डर के अनुसार हुई , इस तथ्य को प्रार्थी ने मिख में भी स्वीकार किया है । उनकी आगे बहस है कि प्रार्थी का नियोजन " कान्ट कॉर सर्विस थान कि " कान्टैक्ट ऑफ सर्विस " । उनकी आगे बहस है कि वरिष्ठता सूची प्रदर्श डब्ल्यू -1 को प्राथर्थी ने साबित नहीं किया है । इस तरह से प्रार्थी जो कि आकस्मिक श्रमिक के रूप में नियुक्त हुआ था तथा अप्रार्थी संस्थान में आकस्मिक श्रमिकों की नियुक्ति हेतु स्थापित अभ नियोजन विभाग से प्राप्त सूची के अनुसार अर्थात " बौज्युअल लेबर पूल " में से प्रार्थी की नियुक्ति की गई थी । आकस्मिक नियोजक के मामलों में वरिष्ठता सूची जारी करणा व धारा 25 एफ, जी व एच अधिनियम आदि की पालमा कतई आवश्यक होता नहीं बताया। अतः प्रार्थी का कलेम खारिज होमे योग्य मताथा । झूमने तकों के समर्थन में मिठात प्रतिनिधि ने दृष्टान्त ( 1 ) 2005 एल.एन.आर. ( एस.सी. ) एम.पी. इलैक्ट्रिसिटी बोर्ड बनाम हरीराम व अन्य तथा ( 2 ) ( 2005 ) 8 एस.सी.सी. 750 सुरेका मगर डिस्ट्रिक्ट पंचायत श्राम्याबाई अमरक्षित्र पेश किये ।
9. मैंने बहस पर गौर किया । जो निर्णय किन्तु प्रकरण में बनाये गधे हैं । उनके संबंध में क्रमशः मेरा विनिश्चय इस तरह से हैं : -
निर्णयः विन्दु सं. 1 :
3. साक्ष्य में प्राथी स्वयं का शपथ पत्र पेश हुआ है जिससे अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि में जिरह की तथा अपने शपथ पत्र के समर्थन में प्रदर्श कब्ल्यू से कव्यू-32 दस्तावेज पेश किये। अप्रार्थी की ओर से गवाट श्री जगदीश लात व श्री सतपाल के बयान सपथ पत्र के रूप में कराने जिनसे प्रार्थी की ओर से जिरह की गई एवं प्रदर्श एम -1 से एम- दस्तावेजात पेश किये ।
6. प्रकरण में प्रार्थी विष्णु कुमार की मृत्यु हो चुकी है और श्री कृष्ण कुमार भाई मृतक प्रार्थी अभिक को विधिक मारिस बनाया
10. प्रकरण में प्रार्थी श्रमिक ने अप्रार्थी के यहां जो कार्य किया उसके में कार्य संबंधी मापेश पेश हुए हैं जिनके अनुसार प्रार्थी * मित्र-2 वर्षों में कार्य किया जो अवधि किसी माह में 4 दिन , किसी 1525 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
कर उसकी सेवाएं समाप्त की गई हैं । इसके विपरीत अप्रार्थी की ओर से श्री जगदीश लाल का शपथ पत्र पेश हुआ है जिन्होंने श्रमिक के संबंध में जारी किये गये कार्य आदेश पेश किये हैं तथा उनके कथनों में आया है कि उन्होंने किसी भी कनिष्ठ को नहीं हटाया है तथा यह भी बताया है कि प्रार्थी श्रमिक को एक निश्चित अवधि के लिए लगाया गया था एवं उक्त अवधि समाप्त होने पर उसकी सेवाएं स्वतः ही समाप्त हो गई थी । इस समस्त विवेचन से मेरा निष्कर्ष है कि धारा 25 जी अधिनियम का उल्लंघन भी हस्तगत प्रकरण में नहीं पाया गया है तथा आकस्मिक श्रमिकों के रूप में, जैसा कि उपर विवेचित अनुसार माननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय के दृष्टान्त को देखने से आकस्मिक तौर पर लगाये गये श्रमिकों की वरिष्ठता सूची रखना भी नियोजक के लिए आवश्यक नहीं है । माह में 5 दिन, तथा किसी माह में 10 दिन आदि रही है । कार्य नियुक्ति तिथि से सेवा मुक्ति की दिनांक तक निरंतर किया हो, ऐसा प्रकरण में नहीं पाया गया है । सेवा मुक्ति से पिछले एक वर्ष में लगातार 240 दिन कार्य किया हो , ऐसा भी कोई साक्ष्य पत्रावली पर नहीं है । स्टेटमेंट ऑफ क्लेम तथा प्रार्थी का जो शपथ पत्र पेश हुआ उसमें भी प्रार्थी का यह कथन नहीं है कि उसने सेवा समाप्ति के एक वर्ष पूर्व की अवधि में 240 दिन लगातार कार्य किया हो । प्रार्थी की ओर से जो दृष्टान्त पेश हुए उनमें से अधिकतर मामलों में प्रार्थी की सेवा मुक्ति से पूर्व एक वर्ष की अवधि में 240 दिन लगातार कार्य करने के तथ्य सिद्ध पाये गये हैं किन्तु हस्तगत प्रकरण में ऐसा नहीं पाया गया है । प्रार्थी की नियुक्ति दैनिक वेतन भोगी कर्मचारी के रूप में रही है । दृष्टान्त सुरेन्द्र नगर डिस्ट्रिक्ट पंचायत बनाम धायाबाई अमरसिन के चरण सं. 18 में वर्णित अनुसार माननीय सर्वोच्च न्यायालय ने माना कि कर्मकार के लिए यह बताया जाना आवश्यक है किउसने उसकी सेवा समाप्ति से पहले वर्ष में 240 दिन लगातार कार्य किया हो, जो इस प्रकरण में नहीं पाया गया है । अतः यह निर्णय बिन्दु प्रार्थी की ओर से सिद्ध होना नहीं पाया गया है और उसके विरूद्ध निर्णित किया जाता है ।
निर्णय बिन्दु सं. 2 :
12. निर्देश जो प्रेषित हुआ उसकी भाषा के अनुसार क्या नियोजक ने प्रार्थी को पुनः नियोजन देने का अवसर दिये बिना उससे कनिष्ठ व्यक्तियों को नियोजन में लिया , इस संबंध में जैसा कि उपर विवेचित हुआ है , कोई वरीयता सूची अस्तित्व में भी थी , ऐसा भी नहीं पाया गया है । आकस्मिक श्रमिकों के संबंध में वरिष्ठता सूची का संधारण किया जाना भी नियोजक से अपेक्षित नहीं माना गया है । प्रार्थी ने अपने बयानों में स्वयं से कनिष्ठ किन किम श्रमिकों को काम पर रखा, नहीं बताया गया है । दृष्टान्त सुरेन्द्र नगर डिस्ट्रिक्ट पंचायत विरूद्ध धायाबाई अमरसिन ( उपर वर्णित के अनुसार आकस्मिक श्रमिकों के संबंध में वरिष्ठता सूची की अपेक्षा नियोजक से नहीं की जा सकती तथा ऐसी किसी वरिष्टता सूची के अभाव में धारा 25 - एच का उल्लंघन होना भी नहीं माना गया है । नोट ' एच' के अनुसार जहां नियोजक की ओर से, वरिष्ठता सूची पेश नहीं की गई हो, ऐसे मामले में प्रतिकूल अवधारणा तभी ली जा सकती है जब ऐसी वरिष्ठता सूची अस्तित्व में थी , ऐसा श्रमिक द्वारा सिद्ध कर दिया जावे । हस्तगत प्रकरण में श्रमिक की ओर से ऐसा सिद्ध नहीं हो पाया है । अतः प्रकरण में धारा 25 -एच अधिनियम का उल्लंघन होना भी प्रार्थी श्रमिक की ओर से सिद्ध नहीं हो पाया है ।
निर्णय बिन्दु सं. 3 :
11. इस निर्णय बिन्दु में यह देखना है कि क्या अप्राथी ने प्रार्थी की सेवा समाप्ति की तब धारा 25 - एफ, जी व एच अधिनियम तथा औद्योगिक विवाद ( केन्द्रीय ) नियम 1957 ( जो कि निर्णय में आगे मात्र नियम कहलायेगा ) के नियम 77-78 का उल्लंघन करते हुए की गई है । धारा 25 - एफ अधिनियम के लिए यह आवश्यक है किकिसी कर्मकार की सेवा समाप्ति से पिछले वर्ष यदि उसकी सेवा लगातार 240 दिन या उससे अधिक है तब धारा 25 - एफ अधिनियम की पालना किया जाना आवश्यक है किन्तु हस्तगत प्रकरण में प्रार्थी द्वारा लगातार 240 दिन की सेवा होना नहीं पाया गया है । धारा 25-जी अधिनियम में छंटनी की प्रक्रिया संबंधी प्रावधान है जिसके अनुसार यदि ऐसा कर्मकार जो किसी विशेष श्रेणी का हो, तो नियोजक के लिए आवश्यक है कि सबसे नीचे वाले कर्मकार की छंटनी पहले करे अर्थात नियोजक द्वारा नियोजन में रहे श्रमिकों की वरिष्ठता सूची रखे एवं उक्त वरिष्ठता सूची में जो सबसे नीचे है उनकी सेवा सबसे पहले समाप्त करे । हस्तगत प्रकरण में श्रमिक की ओर से कोई वरीयता सूची पेश नहीं की गई है और न ही ऐसी कोई सूची पेश करवाने का प्रयास किया गया है । ऐसी कोई वरीयता सूची थी , यह भी श्रमिक की ओर से सिद्ध नहीं हो पाया है । इसके अतिरिक्त प्रार्थी दैनिक वेतन भोगी कर्मचारी के रूप में नियुक्त था तथा उसकी नियुक्ति 15 दिन से अधिक के लिए नहीं की गई थी जो विशेष कार्य एवं निश्चित अवधि के लिए थी । दृष्टान्त सुरेन्द्र नगर डिस्ट्रिक्ट पंचायत विरूद्ध धायाबाई अमरसिन में माननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय ने प्रतिपादित किया है कि जहां दैनिक वेतन भोगी/आकस्मिक कर्मचारी नियुक्त किये जाते हैं उन मामलों में नियोजक से यह अपेक्षा नहीं की जाती कि वे ऐसे कर्मचारियों की वरिष्ठता सूची बनावें । प्रार्थी के जो बयान हुए हैं उनको भी मैंने देखा है प्रार्थी के बयानों में यही आया है कि उससे कनिष्ठ की सेवाएं समाप्त नहीं
14. इस बिन्दु को सिद्ध करने का भार अप्रार्थी नियोजक पर था । प्रार्थी के संबंध में जारी कार्यालय आदेश प्रदर्श एम -1 से एम 5 को देखने से प्रार्थी के संबंध में कार्य आदेश 15 दिन से अधिक के लिए कोई जारी नहीं हुए हैं । इस तरह ये कार्य आदेश एक निश्चित अवधि तक के लिए थे तथा अगले कार्य आदेश पहले कार्य के समाप्त होते ही दूसरे दिन दे दिये गये हों , ऐसा भी नहीं पाया गया है । प्रदर्श एम -1 से एम-5 को देखने से प्रार्थी को भित्र-2 विभागों में एवं भिन्न-2 कार्य हेतु तथा आकस्मिक तौर पर लिया गया है । इस तरह से प्रार्थी की नियुक्ति अथात उसके संबंध में कार्यालय आदेश एक निश्चित अवधि के लिए थे, यह बखूबी पाया गया है । अधिनियमकी धारा 2( 00 ) ( बीबी ) के अनुसार श्रमिक जिनकी सेवा समाप्ति कार्य, के संबंध में जारी संविदा की अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद स्वतः ही समाप्त हो जाना पाया गया है । हस्तगत प्रकरण में जो कार्य आदेश (नियुक्ति आदेश ) दिये गये हैं वे स्वतंत्र रूप से दिये गये हैं न किं पूर्व के कार्यालय आदेश को नवीनीकरण करते हुए दिये गये हैं । दृष्टान्त 1526
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
2007 1 एल.फूल.जे. 696 ( एस.सी. ) एम.डी. कर्नाटक हैण्डलूम डेवेलपमेंट कार्पोरेशन विरुद्ध महादेव लक्ष्मण सबल तथा दृष्टान्त 2007 1 एल.एल.जे. पेज 717 (एस.सी. ) गंगाधर पिलई विरुद्ध सीमेन्स स्लिमिलेट में इसी संबंध में प्रतिपादित करते हुए माना कि जहां ऐसे व्यक्ति जिनको आकस्मिक श्रमिक के रूप में कई वर्षों तक किन्तु कुछ कुछ समय के बाद ( इन्टरनीटेंटली ) कार्य पर लिया गया उसकी सेवाः समाप्ति कसे कारा 2 ( ०० ) अधिनियम में वर्णित अनुभधार छंटनी नहीं कहा जा सकता तथा भारा 2 ( बीची ) अधिनियम के अनुसार भी ऐसी सेवा समाप्ति कटनी की परिभाषा में नहीं आती । अतः यह निर्णय बिन्दु अर्थी नियोचक की ओर से सिद्ध होना पायक गया है ।
निर्णय विन्दु सं. 4 :
15. यह निर्णय बिन्दु अनुच्छे से संबंधित है और उपरोक्त विवेचन के आधार पर प्रार्थी किसी अनुशेष का अधिकारी नहीं है अतः निर्देश का उत्तर निम्म प्रकार दिया जाता है :
" खेतड़ी कॉपर काम्पलैक्स विन्दुसमन कॉपर लि. के प्रबन्धम द्वारा श्री किल्णु गुम्मार को दिनांक 20-3-1985 से 30-8-92 तक आंतरामिक रूप से रोम में नियोजित करने के पश्चात् दिनांक 30-8-92 से सेवा मुक्त करना व उससे कनिष्ठ श्रमिकों को नियोषित करने से पहले प्रार्थी को अवसर नहीं देने की कार्यवं है । प्रार्थी कोई राहत पाने का अधिकारी नहीं है । "
16. अवार्ड आज दिनांक 07-08-2006 बजे खुलेग्यापाराव में लिखाया जाकर सुनाया गया जो केन्द्र सार्न निचनानुसार भेजाजावे ।
मौतम प्रकाश सर्मा, न्यायाधीश नई दिल्ली , 5 मार्च , 2009
का.आ. 778 औद्योगिक विकार अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार हिन्दुस्तान कापर लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियमों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विभार में औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संभा सी. आई टी 55/96 ) को प्रकाशित कालती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-03-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [सं. एल-43012/2/1996- आई आर ( एम ) ]
कमल कजरू , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 5thMarch, 2009
S.O. 778 Inpursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( f 1977 the Central Government hereby published No. C.I.T. 55/96) of the Industrial Tribunal Jaipur news alswn- in the Annexure, instBispute between tee employers in relation to the meangement of Hindustan Copper Ltd. and their worksbisk vins received by the CentralGovernment on. 5-3-2009.
[PART I -Sec. 3 ( ii )]
[No. L-43012/2/1996- IR (M) ]
KAMAL BAKHRU, Desk Officer
अनुबंध
केन्द्रीयांचाविकरण जयपुर केस नं. सी.आई.टी. 55/96
रेपोरश्रम मंधालय, नई दिल्ली का आदेश क. एल -43012 /2/96- ( दि. 13-11-96 श्री स्वनी र पुत्र श्री शर्मा, कार्ड नं. 279/85
----प्रार्थी एकीनरेटर , हिन्दुसत्तम कॉपर लि. , सखेतड़ी कॉपर लैक्स, कोतड़ी नगर , झुंझनू ।
-----अप्रार्थी
-उपस्थित
पीरी श्री मौसम प्रकाश शर्मा, आर.एच.जे.
एस.
प्राथी की ओर से:
:: कोई उपस्थित नहीं
अक्रर्थी की ओर से :
श्री मनोज कुमार शर्मा दिनांक अवार्ड 07-08-2008
अवार्ड
1. ककेन्द्र सरकार, श्रम मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली ने उपरोक्त आदेश से निम्न सूची कह विवाद इस न्यायाधिकरण को अधिनिर्णय हेतु निर्देशिय किया है:
"Whether the action of the managensent of Khetri CopperComplex, Kindaitan Copper Ltd. Khetri Nagar, Dist. Jhunjhunu is justified, in terminating the services of Shri Rajnish Kumar Sharma (workman) w.e.f. 30-8-92, (A/N) after employing him as Casual workman w.e.f.23-1-85 to 30-8-92, intermittently without giving any opportunity of employnment before employing workansenjunior to him, in violation ofSection 25 -H of the L.D. Act is justified ? If not,to what relief the workman is entitled and from what date ?"
2. प्रार्थी श्रमिक की ओर से विवाद के समर्थन में निम्न तथ्यों का स्टेटमेंट ऑफ बरप्रेम पेश हुआ कि श्रमिक ने अफ्रर्थी नियोजक के यहां आकस्मिक श्रमिक के रूप में दिनांक 23-1-85 से कार्य करना प्रारंभ किम्भा जो कार्य वह 29-8-92 तक करता रहा किन्तु नियोजक ने 30-8-92.से उसे कोई कारण बहाने बिना काम पर लेग से इन्कार कर दिया व सेवा से पृथक कर दिया । इस संबंध में श्रमिक ने निशेषक के यहां प्रतिवेदन भी दिया किन्तु उनके द्वारा कोई कार्यवाही नहीं की गई तब विकार श्रमिक की ओर से सहायक श्रम आयुक्त (ककेन्द्रीय ) के वहां प्रस्तुत किया किन्तु उक्त विवाद में भी समझौता नहीं होने पर इस अनुसूची का विवाद अभिनिर्णय हेतु इस अधिकरण में भेजा गया है । आगे कथन रहा है कि श्रमिक की सेवा समाप्ति क्लेम के चरण सं. 5 के पैरा ' 1 ' से वर्णित ' 6 ' के अनुसार अनुचित 1527 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4. अनुतोष ?
एवं अवैध है क्योंकि श्रमिक दिनांक 23-1-85 से 29-8-92 तक निरन्तर कार्य कर रहा था लेकिन उसने बिना कोई कारण बताये व बिना कोई जांच किये तथा बिना एक माह का नोटिस या नोटिस वेतन व छंटनी का मुआवजा दिये सेवा पृष्यक कर दिया जो धारा 25 एफ औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 (जिसे निर्णय में आगे मात्र अधिनियम लिखत जायेगा ) का उल्लंघन है । इसी तरह से नियोजक ने प्रार्थी को सेवा से अलग करते समय नियम 77 के अनुसार आकस्मिक श्रमिकों की कोई वरिष्ठता सूची जारी नहीं की जो किया जाना अवाश्यक थाः । इसी तरह से प्रार्थी से कनिष्ठ श्रमिकों को पदोन्नत व स्थाई कर दिया किन्तु उससे पूर्व प्रार्थी को सेवा का कोई अवसर नहीं दिया । श्रमिक ने एक वर्ष में 240 दिन कार्य नहीं किया तब भी नियोजक के लिए धारा 25 -जी की पालना आवश्यक थी । इस तरह से श्रमिक की ओर से स्टेटमेंट ऑफ क्लेम रहा है कि श्रमिक की सेवा समाप्ति अधिनियम की धारा 25 - एफ , जी व एच के प्रावधानों के उल्लंघन से व नियम 77 के उल्लंघन से अनुचित व अवैध है ।
6. अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि ने अपनी बहस में बताया कि प्रार्थी स्वयं ने अपने को आकस्मिक श्रमिक होना स्वीकार किया है । इसके अतिरिक्त अप्रार्थी की ओर से ऐंगेजमेंट आदेश भी पेश हुआ है अतः कार्य समाप्त होते ही उसकी नियुक्ति समाप्त होना माना जाये । प्रार्थी कीनियुक्ति ऐंगेजमेंट आर्डर के अनुसार हुई, इस तथ्य को प्रार्थी ने जिरह में भी स्वीकार किया है । उनकी आगे बहस है कि प्रार्थी का नियोजन " कानटेक्ट फॉर सर्विस " कांन्ट्रैक्ट ऑफ सर्विस " । उनकी आगे बहस है कि वरिष्टता सूची प्रर्दश डब्ल्यू-1 को प्रार्थी ने साथित नहीं किया है । इस तरह से प्रार्थी जो कि आकस्मिक श्रमिक के रूप मेंनियुक्त हुआ था तथा अप्रार्थी संस्थान में आकस्मिक श्रमिकों की नियुक्ति हेतु स्थापित श्रम नियोजन विभाग से प्राप्त सूची के अनुसार अर्थात " कैज्युअल लेबर पूल " में से प्रार्थी की नियुक्ति की गई थी: आकस्मिक नियोजक के मामलों में वरिष्ठता सूची जारी करना व बारा 25-एफ, जी व एच अधिनियम आदि की पालना कतई आवश्यक होना नहीं बताया अतः प्रार्थी का क्लेम खारिज हो योग्य बताया । अपने तर्को के समर्थन में विद्वान प्रतिनिधि ने दृष्टान्त ( 1 ) 2005 एल.एल.आर. ( एस.सी ) एम.पी. इलैक्िट्सटी बोर्ड बनाम हरीराम व अन्य तथा ( 2 ) (2005 ) 8 एस.सी.सी. 750 सुरेन्द्र नगर डिस्ट्रिक्ट पंचायत विरूद्ध धायाबाई अमरसिन पेश किये ।
7. मैंने बहस पर गौर किया । जो निर्णय बिन्दु प्रकरण में बनाये गये हैं, उनके संबंध में क्रमशः मेरा विनिश्चय इस तरह से है:- निर्णय बिन्दु सं. 1:
3. नियोजक की ओर से जवाब पेश हुआ जिसमें आरंभिक आपत्तियां ली गई कि श्रमिक को आकस्मिक कार्यों हेतु समय- समय पर लगाया गया था एवं उक्त कार्य के पूर्ण होने पर उसकी सेवाएं स्वतः ही समाप्त हो गई थी । इस तरह से प्रार्थी की सेवा मुक्ति छंटनी की परिभाषा में नहीं आती है और धारा 2 (00 ) ( बीबी ) अधिनियम के प्रावधानों के अनुसार नियोजन को प्रारंभ और समाप्त होना था । मदवार जवाब देते हुए बताया कि प्रार्थी ने नियोजक के द्वारा 23-1-85 से 30-8-92 की अवधि में संविदा अनुसार समय समय पर कार्य किया जो कार्य आकस्मिक व उपलब्ध कार्यों पर किया । प्रार्थी की सेवा समाप्ति के एक वर्ष पूर्व 240 दिन की नहीं रही । इस तरह से प्रार्थी क्योंकि संविदा स्वरूप व समय समय पर एक निश्चित अवधि व निश्चित वेतन पर आवश्यक कार्य हेतु सेवारत था , अतः प्रार्थी के मामले में धारा 25 एफ , जी व एच अधिनियम के प्रावधानों का उल्लंघन होना नहीं पाया जाता है ।
4. साक्ष्य में प्रार्थी स्वयं का शपथ पत्र पेश हुआ है जिससे अप्रार्थी प्रतिनिधि ने जिरह की तथा अपने शपथ पत्र के समर्थन में प्रदर्श डब्ल्यू.। से डब्ल्यू-52 दस्तावेज पेश किये । अप्रार्थी की ओर से गवाह श्री जगदीश लाल व श्री सतपाल के बयान शपथ पत्र के रूप में कराये जिनसे प्रार्थी की ओर से जिरह की गई ।
5. प्रार्थी की ओर से कोई उपस्थित नहीं आया अत्तः अप्रार्थी के प्रतिनिधि की बहस सुनी , पत्रावली का अवलोकन किया । प्रकरण में मेरे समक्ष निम्न बिन्दु तय करने हेतु है:
1. क्या प्रार्थी श्रमिक ने विपक्षी संस्थान में दिनांक 23-1-85 से आकस्मिक श्रमिक के रूप में उसकी सेवा मुक्ति की दिनांक 30-8-92 तक निरन्तर कार्य किया ?
2. क्या प्रार्थी की सेवा समाप्ति अधिनियम की धारा 25 - एफ, जी, एच व औद्योगिक विवाद केन्द्रीय नियम , 1957 के नियम 77-78 का उल्लंघन कर की गई ?
8. प्रकरण में प्रार्थी श्रमिक ने अप्राथी के यहां जो कार्य कित्या उसके संबंध में कार्य संबंधी आदेश पेश हुए हैं जिनके अनुसार प्रार्थी ने भिन्न -2 वर्षों में कार्य किया जो अवधि किसी माह में 4 दिन , किसी माह में 5 दिन , तथा किसी माह में 9 दिन आदि रही है । कार्य नियुक्तितिथि से सेवा मुक्ति की दिनांक तक निरंतर किया हो , ऐसा प्रकरण में नहीं पाया गया है । सेवा मुक्ति से पिछले एक वर्ष में लगातार 240 दिन कार्य हो , ऐसी भी कोई साक्ष्य पावली पर नहीं है । स्टेटमेंट ऑफ क्लेम तथा प्रार्थी का जो शपथ पत्र पेश हुआ उसमें भी प्रार्थी का यह कथन नहीं है कि उसने सेवा समाप्ति के एक वर्ष पूर्व कीअवधि में 240 दिन लगातार कार्य किया हो । प्रार्थी की ओर से जो दृष्टयन्त पेश हुए उनमें से अधिकतर मामलों में प्रार्थी की सेवा मुक्ति से पूर्व एक वर्ष की अवधि में 240 दिन लगातार कार्य करने के तथ्य सिद्ध पाये गये हैं किन्तु हस्तगत प्रकरण में ऐसा नहीं पाया गया है । प्रार्थी की नियुक्ति दैनिक वेतन भोगी कर्मचारी के रूप में रहीं है । दृष्टान्त सुरेन्द्र नगर डिस्ट्रिक्ट पंचायत बनाम धायाबाई अमरसिन के चरण सं. 18 में वर्णित अनुसार माननीय सर्वोच्च न्यायालय ने माता किकर्मकार के लिए यह बताया जाना आवश्यक है कि उसने उसकी सेवा समाप्ति से पहले वर्ष में 240 दिन लगातार कार्य किया हो, जो इस प्रकरण में नहीं पाया गया है । अतः यह निर्णय बिन्दु प्रार्थी की ओर से सिद्ध होना नहीं पाया गया है और उसके विरूद्ध निर्णित किया जाता है ।
निर्णय बिन्दु सं. 2 :
3. क्याप्रार्थी की सेवा मुक्ति छंटनी की परिभाषा में नहीं आती और धारा 2 ( 00 ) ( बी बी ) अधिनियम के अनुसार प्रार्थी का नियोजन आरंभ व समाप्त होना था ?
9. इस निर्णय बिन्दु में यह देखना है कि क्या अप्रार्थी ने प्रार्थी की सेवा समाप्ति की तब धारा 25 - एफ , जी व एच अधिनियम तथा 1528
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 28 , 2009/ CHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART IISEC. 3(ii ) ]
नियोजक की ओर से वरिष्ठता सूची पेश नहीं की गई हो , ऐसे मामले में प्रतिकूल अवधारमा तभी ली जा सकती है जब ऐसी वरिष्ठता सूची अस्तित्व में थी, ऐका श्रमिक द्वारा सिद्ध कर दिया जाये । हस्तगत प्रकरण में श्रमिक की ओर से ऐसा सिद्ध नहीं हो माया है । अतः प्रकरण में भास 25 - एच अधिनियम का उल्लंघन होना भी प्रार्थी श्रमिक की ओर से सिद्ध नहीं हो पाया है ।
निर्णय विष्णु सं. 3 :
11. इस बिन्दु को सिद्ध करने का भार अप्रार्थी नियोजक पर था । प्राथी के संबंध में जारी कार्यालय आदेश प्रर्दश एम-1 से एम -17 को देखने से प्राथी के संबंध में कार्य आदेश 15 दिन से अधिक के लिए कोई जारी नहीं हुए हैं । इस तरह ये कार्यं आदेश एक निश्चित अवधि तक के लिए थे तथा अगले कार्य आदेश पहले कार्य के समाप्त होते ही दूसरे दिन दे दिये गये हों, ऐसा भी नहीं पाया गया है । प्रदर्श एम-1 से एम-17 को देखने से प्रार्थी को भिन्न-2 विभागों में एवं भिन्न-2 कार्य हेतु तथा आकस्मिक तौर पर लिया गया है । इस तरह से प्रार्थी की नियुक्ति अर्थात उसके संबंध में कार्यालय आदेश एक निश्चित अवधि के लिए थे, यह मखूबी पाया गया है । अधिनियम की धारा 2(00)( बीपी) के अनुसार श्रमिक जिनकी सेवा समाप्ति कार्य के संबंध में बकरी सपिफ की अवधि समाप्त होते के बाद स्वतः ही समाप्त हो जाना पापा गक है । हस्तगत प्रकरण में जो कार्य आदेश (नियुक्ति आदेश ) दिये गये है वे स्वतंत्र रूप से दिये गये हैं न कि पूर्व के कार्यालय आदेश को नवीनीकरण करते हुए दिये गये हैं । दृष्टान्त 2007 1 एल.एम. के. 696 ( एस.सी. ) एम.डी. कर्नाटक हैण्डलूम डेवेलपमेंट कार्पोरेशन विरूद्ध महादेव लक्ष्मण स्थल तथा दृष्टान्त 20071 एल.एल.जे. पेज 717 ( एस.सी. ) गंगाधर फिलई विरूद्ध सीमेन्स लिमिटेड में इसी संबंध में प्रतिपादित करते हुए माना कि जहां ऐसे व्यक्ति जिनको आकस्मिक श्रमिक के रूप में कई वर्षों तक किन्तु कुछ समय के बाद (इम्टरमीटेंटली ) कार्य पर लिया गया उसकी सेवा समाप्ति को धारा 2 (00 ) अधिनियम में वर्णित अनुसार छंटनी नहीं कहा जा सकता तथा थापा 2 ( 00 ) ( बी बी) अधिनियम के अनुसार भी ऐसी सेवा समाप्ति नी की परिभाषा में नहीं आती । अतः यह निर्णय बिन्दु अप्रार्थी नियोजक की ओर से सिद्ध होना पांया गया है ।
निर्णय सिन्धुसं. 4:
औद्योगिक विवाद ( केन्द्रीय ) नियम 1957 ( जो कि निर्णय में आगे मात्र नियम कहलायेगा ) के नियम 77-78 का उल्लंघन करते हुए की गई है । धारा 25 - एफ अधिनियम के लिए यह आवश्यक है किकिसी कर्मकार की सेवा समाप्ति से पिछले वर्ष यदि उसकी सेवा लगातार 240 दिन या उससे अधिक है तब धारा 25 - एफ अधिनियम की पालना किया जाना आवश्यक है किन्तु इस्वगतः प्रकरण में प्रार्थी द्वारा लगातार 240दिन की सेवा होना नहीं पाया गया है । धारा 25 -जी अधिनियम में छंटनी की प्रक्रिया संबंधी प्रावधान है. जिसके अनुसार यदि ऐसा कर्मकार जो किसी विशेष श्रेणी का हो, तो नियोजक के लिए आवश्यक है कि सबसे नीचे बाले कर्मकार की कंटनी पहले करे अर्थात्नियोजक द्वारा नियोजन में रहे श्रमिकों की वरिष्ठता सूची रखो एवं उक्त वरिष्ठता सूची में जो सबसे नीचे है उनकी सेथा सबसे पहले समाप्त करे । हस्तगत प्रकरण में श्रमिक की ओर से कोई वरीयता सूची पेश नहीं की गई है और न ही ऐसी कोई सूची पेश करवाने का प्रयास किया गया है । ऐसी कोई वरीयता सूची भी , यह भी श्रमिक की ओर से सिद्ध नहीं हो पाया है । इसके अशिक्षित. प्राधी दैनिक वेतन भोगी कर्मचारी के रूप में नियुक्त था तथा उसकी नियुक्ति 15 दिन से ज्यादा के लिए नहीं की गई थी जो विशेष कार्य एवं निश्चित अवधि के लिए थी । दृष्टान्त सुरेन्द्र नगर डिस्ट्रिक्ट पंचायत बिरुद्ध धायाबाई अमरसिन में पाननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय के प्रतिपादित किया है कि जहां दैनिक वेतन भोगी/आकस्मिक कर्मचारी नियुक्त किये जाते हैं उन मामलों में नियोजक से यह अपेक्षा नहीं की जाती कि वे ऐसे कर्मचारियों की वरिष्ठता सूची बनावें । प्रार्थी के जो बयान हुए हैं. उनकी भी मैंने देखा है । प्राथी के बयानों में यही आया है कि उससे कनिष्ठ की सेवाएं समाप्त नहीं कर उसकी सेवाएं समाप्त की गई हैं । इसके विपरीत अप्रार्थी की ओर से श्री जगदीश लाल का शपथ पत्र पेश हुआ है जिन्होंने श्रमिक के संबंध में जारी किये गये कार्य आदेश पेश किये हैं तथा उनके कथनों में पाया है कि उन्होंने किसी भी कनिष्ठ को नहीं हटाया है तथा यह भी बताया है कि प्रार्थी श्रमिक को एक निश्चित अवधिके लिए लगाया गया था एवं उक्त अवधि समाप्त होने पर उसकी सेवाएं स्वतः ही समाप्त हो गई थी । इस समस्त विवेचन से मेरा निष्कर्ष है कि धारा 25 जी अधिनियम का उल्लंघन भी हस्तगत प्रकरण में नहीं पाया गया है तथा आकस्मिक श्रमिकों के रूप में, जैसा कि ऊपर विवेचित अनुसार माननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय के दृष्टान्त को देखने से आकस्मिक तौर पर लगाये गये श्रमिकों की वरिष्ठता सूची रखना भी नियोजक के लिए आवश्यक नहीं है । *
12. यह निर्णय बिन्दु अनुतोष से संबंधित है और उपरोक्त विवेचम के आधार परः प्रार्थी किसी अनुतोष का अधिकारी नहीं है अतः निर्देश का उत्तर निम्न प्रकार दिया जाता है :
" खोतड़ी कॉपर काम्पलैक्स हिन्दुस्तान कॉपर लि. के प्रबन्धन
द्वारा श्री रजनीश शर्मा को दिनांक 23-1-85 से 30-8-92 तक आंतरामिक सत्र से आकस्मिक श्रमिक के रूप में नियोजित करने के पश्चात् दिनांक 30-8-92 से सेवा मुक्त करना व उससे कनिष्ठ श्रमिकों को नियोजित करने से पहले प्रार्थी को अवसर नहीं देने की कार्यवाही उचित एवं वैध है । प्रार्थी कोई राहत पाने का अधिकारी नहींहै । "
13. अवार्ड आज दिनांक 7-8-2008 को खुले न्यायालय में लिखाया जाकर सुमाया गया जो केन्द्र सरकार को प्रकाशनार्थ नियमानुसार भेजाजाये ।
10. निर्देश जो प्रेषित हुआ उसकी भाषा के अनुसार क्या नियोजक ने प्रार्थी को पुनः नियोजन देने का अवसर दिये बिना उससे कनिष्ठ व्यक्तियों को नियोजन में लिया , इस संबंध में जैसा कि उपर विवेचित हुआ है कोई वरीयता सूची अस्तित्व में थी, ऐसा भी नहीं पाया गया है । आकस्मिक श्रमिकों के संबंध में वरिष्ठता सूची का संधारण किया जाना भी नियोजक से अपेक्षित नहीं माना गया है । प्रार्थी ने अपने बयानों में स्वयं से कनिष्ठ किन किन श्रमिकों को काम 'पर रखा , नहीं बताया है । दृष्टान्त सुरेन्द्र नगर डिस्ट्रिक्ट पंचायत विरूद्ध धायाबाई अमरसिन ( उपर वर्णित ) के अनुसार आकस्मिक श्रमिकों के संबंध में वरिष्ठता सूची की अपेक्षा नियोजक से नहीं की जा सकती तथा ऐसी किसी वरिष्ठता सूची के अभाव में धारा 25 - एच का उल्लंघन होना भी नहीं माना गया है । नोट ' एच ' के अनुसार जहां
गौतम प्रकाश शर्मा, न्यायाधीश [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
नईदिल्ली, 5 मार्च , 2009
का.आ. 779.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय विमानपत्तन प्राधिकरण के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2 मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी.जी.आई.टी. 2/41 आफ 2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-03-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -11012/ 12 /2003- आईआर ( एम ) ]
कमल बाखरू , डेस्क, अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 5th March, 2009
S.O. 779.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/ 41 of2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. 2 Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Airport Authority of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 5-03-2009.
[No. L- 11012/ 12/2003- IR (M) ]
KAMAL BAKHRU, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2, MUMBAI Present: A. A. Lad, Presiding Officer
Reference No. CGIT-2/41 of2003 Empolyers in relation to the Management of Airport Authority of India
TheAdditional General Manager (P&A) , Airport Authority of India,
.... FirstParty Mumbai Airport, Mumbai-400099
V/s.
Their Workmen
Sh . Rehmatali Fatehmohd Shaikh, RamabaAmbedkar Nagar, D.B.Pawar Chowk , Siddharath Chawl, E.E. Highway R.No. 3246, Ghatkopar (E) , Murnbal -400075. Second Party
Appearance
FortheEmployer: S/Shri Shamrao S. Patil and Mr. Avinash Patil ,
Advocates.
For the Workmen: Mr. Jaiprakash Sawant, Advocate Date ofreserving the Award : 22-7-2008. Date ofpassing the Award : 22-1-2009.
AWARD
The matrix of the facts as culled out from the proceedings are as under:
:
1529
भारत का राजपत्र : भार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labourby itsOrder No. L- 11012/ 12/2003 - IR (M) dated 4thAugust, 2003 in exercise ofthe powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section ( 1) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following disputeto this Tribunal for adjudication:
" Whether the action of the management ofAirport Authority of India, Mumbai in terminating the services of Mr. R.F. Shaikh , ex - safaiwala w.e.f. 25-5-1991 is legal and justified? If not, what relief workman is entitled to?".
2. To support the subject matter involved in the reference2ndParty filed Statement ofClaim atExt. 6 making out the case that, he was employed by the 1st Party at Sahar Airport as a Safaiwala from 1-10-1986 . He states that, he was in continuous service. However, he was shown as a contract worker in the beginning employed through various contractors . He states that, by operation of law his namewas taken on the roll of the Management and hewas paid wages directly by the Management from 1990 or so . He states that, there was direct master and servant relationship between the Management and the concerned workman. He submits that, he was paid wages by the Management directly after doing the work ofcleaning and sweeping. He states that , other employees including Sunil Bapu Kamble and other 183 workmen covered in the Writ Petition No , 1497 of 1989 including these Workmen were treated as employees of the 1st Party by the orders ofthe Hon'ble High Court . He states that, a false complaint was lodgedby theManagement against him and he was handed over to the Police and criminal case was filed against him. He was not allowed to report on duty from 25-51,991 on the guise that criminal case pending against him. He states that, Hon'ble Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade Court,Mumbai acquitted him by his order dated12-8-1997. Then he approched the Management with the order ofthe acquittal with a request to allow him to report on his duty but he was not allowed to report for duty and as such he claims that, hewas illegally terminated from 25-5-1991.
3.He states that, the action of the Management in terminating his services with effect from 25th May , 1991 is illegal and unjustified and against the principles ofnatural justice. He states that , without following provisions of Section 25F of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 and other provisions he was terminated by the Management for no reason. So he claims that , he be reinstated with payment of backwages w.e.f. 25th May, 1991 with consequential benefits.
4.Management disputed the claim ofthe 2nd Party by filing reply at Exhibit 1 Imaking out the case that, 2nd 2nd Party is not its employee . He is employee of the Contractor . It is stated that , on 26-5-1991 he was caught byAirport Security Police and his search resulted in tothe seizure of 3 gold chains weighing about 711 grms . ofgold from him. Seizure was effected bythe Sahar Police Station who carried out the investigations and concerned workman was arrested under Section 41 (D ) ofthe Code of Criminal Procedure. A criminal case was filed against him before the 22nd Magistrate's Court who placed the concerned workman in the custody of the Customs Officer on 1-6-1991 . Then he was arrested by Customs Officer who 1530
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 200MCHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART 11-Sec. 3 ( ii) ]
2nd Partywhich he did not do . As he fails to do so it is stated that, quation does not arise todirect the 1st Party to reliusion de concerned workman by question and satide the temnination order . So it is submitted that, the prayer prayed by the 2nd Party require to be rejected. since Reference kself is not tenable .
#. In view ofthe above pleadings issueswere framed at Exhibit 13 which I answer as under:
took charge of the 3 gold chains cessed from the concerned workman. Then his statement was recorded onlat Juno, 1991 where concerned workanen conceded the fact of possession of gold. Then he was charge shested by the CustomsAuthorities under Sections 7 (35)( 1 ) (a)(i) and other Sections 135 ( 1 )(b) (i ) ofthe Customs Act as well as under Section5 ofthe Imports & Exports (Control)Act , 1947. He was prosecuted before Chief bistropolitan Magistrate at Mumbai by filing Criminal came No. 21 /CW/92.
FINDINGS
No
1. Does sevend party workanan proves that, anting talon agains him under the chellange is illegal and unjustified?
5. 1st Party contended that, after adducing the evidencebyprosecution on the basis ofwhich chargewas framed,the ChiefMetropoliten Kingistrate by his orderdated 12th August, 1997 acquined the enhorned workman.
Does Not
Arise.
2. Does first Pary prove that action of termination isjustifiable and legal ?
2(a) Is referenca tenable in the light of varione grounds taken by first party? No
2(b) Wasther and Party establishes his relations with first party as its
No 6. 1st Party further contended that , then 2nd Party filed Writ Petition being No. 2006 of 1999before the Hon'ble High Courtat Bombay against ist Party and Contractor, No reliefwas granted by the Honble High Court in the said WritPetition to the conearmed worlunen. Even he prayed for reinstatement in the said Wirit Petition which was not consideredby the Hon'ble High Court. The anid Writ Petition was dismissed. Now the concerned Workmen cannot take benefit of the writ Petition.
No
3. IsIs second party entitled for reliefas refured in the Reference?
4. What order?
As per order
passed
below
REASONS:
NORMES NOS. 1,2,3(b) :
9. 2nd Party claims that , he is employee of the Ist Party and he was. Hingally terminated. Whereas facts , as stated by the Int Party, that he is not its employee andthe question of termination and question of reinstatement of 2nd Partywith Int Party does not arise.
7.It is submittedby the ist Party that, the concerned workman approached Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) II, Bombay by his desmaid letter dated 17-2-2000, copy of the said demand was not forwarded to the 1st Party. However, it was addressed to General Manager (P& A) ofAuthority. Since 2nd Party's prayer was not considered in the Writ Petition and since he was not appointedby the 1st Party, 2nd Party cannot claim any relief against Ist Party. It is stated that, the 2nd Party is not the eraployee of the ist Party. It is stated that , he was not on the roll ofthe 1st Party. He has not tonds Contractor as a Party in thisproceeding since he was working through such Contractors . Assistent Commissioner of a Labour/ ConslilationOfficer subuitind hilure without case ofthe First Party since 1st Party was not present before it. It is stated that , Reference filed by the concerned Workman does not fall under Sestion 2(k) or Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It is stated that, merely sending demand to the Canallintion Officer without dispute being raised by his against its amployer as well as against the principal employer regarding suck demand it cannot become industria' industrial dispuse . Huse this dispute dees not exist unless and until demand is raised by the werkman with the 1st Party and it isrejected. So it is submitted that, theorder ofReferencs dated 4th August,2003 made by the Government ofIndia, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi , itself is badin law, invalid and veld ab initio . It is statedthat, the dispute was neither spensared by the Union of its workars.nor by the majority ofthe workmen belongingto hisclass, employed in the establishment ofthe 1st Party. It is submitted that, since redesnes is not maintainable, 2nd Party cannot claim anyth font and Party cannot claim in indevidual capacity. previsions of Industrial DisputesAct, 1947. Since he is not an employes ofthe iss Party and has not proved any relation with Ist Party and demand against it, he ca any relief. It is subesitted that, he should have promoted the Reference against his employer Le. contrastor far greating the prayers prayedby
10. Inthat respectifIfwe go through the evidence led by2nd Party by Bling niidavit at Exhibit 16 in lieu ofthe examination- in- chief,we find he states that, he was employed for cleaning and sweeping by the odierector in the establishment of the Ist Party with effect from 1-10-1966. He agus that, he was paid wages for his work by the management of AAI through the contractors M/s . Deshmuith Associates and thereafter by one Rajan and Farida Madam. He claims that, all these contract arrangements were illegal , sham, bogus and he is on the roll ofthe ist party . He claims that, the so called contrasters were removed and the workmen were directly paid wages by thethe Management in pursuance ofWrit PatitionNo. 1994 of1980. No. 1994 of 1980. He states that , Macagoment refused his emplds employmentwith effect from 26-5-1991 under the gules ofhis about by the Airport Security Police.He states that, though he was soquitted from the Criminal ose still hewas not permitted to resume duties . In the cross be states that, in 1986 he was appointed by Contractor.Then he slains that in 1990 he was taken by Airport Authority as Sweeper. He states that, he cannot point out the order given by Airport Authority of India. No admits that, he was arvested by Airport Security Police. He also admits that, he was produced before Metropolitan
!
1531 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
Magistrate. He admits that, was kept in custody on 1-6-1991 . He unable to state whether Customs Police recorded his statement. He also states that, he is not aware whether, he wasprosecutedby Customs Department . He is also unable to state whether , his said trial was numbered as Crimanal Case i.e. CC No. 21/92. He admits that, he did not complain about role played by the 1st Party in prosecuting him. He states that, he cannot produce copy of any letter addressed to Airport Authority. He admits that, he was in jail for 1-1/2 months in 1999. He states that , he approached Contractor without any application and requested him to allow him to work. Against that, 1st Party led evidence by filing affidavit atExhibit 18 in lieu ofthe Examination - in-chief ofNatesh Panner Selvan who states that, 2nd Party is not workman of the 1st Party and is not concerned with Authority.
was arrested by the Police and sine criminal case was filed against him and though he was acquitted in the said case, and when he reported for duty he was not taken on duty. Thatmeans there is no direct termination order . Besides it reveals that, 1st Party did not refuse 2nd Party to work as Sweeper. Moreover stand taken by the Ist Party that, he was not direct employee of the 1st Party and same is admittedbythe 2nd Party in his affidavit which he has filed ashis evidence at Exhibit 16. In para- 2 ofhis said affidavit he states that, he was paid wages for his work done for the Management of AAI by M/ s Deshmukh Associates and thenby Shri Rajan and thereafter by Farida Madam. When his case is that, he worked with these 2 agencies and when he isunable to point out who is employer of 2nd Party or he is appointed by lst Party as well as he was terminated bylst Party, question of involving 1st Party in the Reference in fact does not arise . Besides as rightly pointed out by 1st Party that, there was no demand nor from the 2nd Party in his individual capacity nor from the Union for the 2nd Partyby the majority of the employees of the 1st Party in support of the demand of the 2nd Party against 1st Party . When there was no such demand and when there was no conciliation with 1st Party question of involving 1st Party doesnot arise.
13. At the same time when there was no demand from the 2nd Party against first Party and when there was no conciliation at all against 1st Party, question of sending failure report and involving first Party does not arise . So I conclude that, the Reference itself in the present form is not maintainable . So I answer this issue to that effect.
11. So this is the evidence led by the 2nd Party to show that, he is workman of the Ist Party and he was terminated by 1Party. But here 2nd Party is unable to point out appointment order issued by 1st Party. He is unable to point out termination order issued by the 1st Party. When there is no appointment order question of 2nd Party's termination order alleged issued by the 1st Party against 2nd Party in my considered viewdoes not arise . In these premises here case of terminating the services by 1st Party and justifying said termination by 1st Party does not arise. Evidence brought on record shows that 1st party has not terminated the 2nd Party. Even 1st Party did not appoint 2nd Party. When 2nd Party was not appointed by 1st Party then question of justifying termination by the 1st Party does not arise . So I answer this issue to that effect.
ISSUE NO. 3 :
ISSUE NO. 2(a) :
14. 2nd Party claims reinstatement with back wages and continuity of service. However, when 2nd Party unable to show that , he was employed by the 1st Party and terminated by 1st Party in my considered view, question of setting aside termination and directing 1st Party to reinstate 2nd Party does not arise . Besides number ofcase laws are referredby 1st Party's Advocate more precisely in 1992 II LLJ page 782 of Kerala High Court in the case of K.K. Thilakan & Ors vs. FACT Ltd. & Anr. , citation published in 2005 II LLJ pageLLJ page 850 ofGauhati High Court in the case of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs Presiding Officer , Central Government Industrial Tribunal , Guwahati and Ors . and citationpublished in 2001 III CLR page 349 ofApex Court in the case of Steel Authority of India Ltd. and Ors . vs National Union Water Front Workers & Ors . also support the stand of the 1st Party to say that, contract employee cannot claim permanency in the establishment ofprincipal employer. So I conclude that, 2nd Party is not entitled for any relief. Hence I answer this issue in negative.
15. In view of the discussions made above I , conclude that, Reference of 2nd Party deserves to be rejected. Hence , the order .
ORDER Reference is rejected with no order as to its costs . Bombay, 22nd January, 2009.
A.A. LAD, Presiding Officer 12. 1st Party claims that reference is not tenable since it isnot reference under Section 2(k) or Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. These contentions have been takenby 1st Party in paras 6 and 8 ofthe Written Statement atExhibit 11. The case of the 1st Party is that, 2nd Party approached the Conciliation Officer with his demand letter, copies ofwhich were sent to his employer and on the basis of the said demand letter Conciliation Officer initiated proceedings and submitted failure report . It was not filed by the Union, neither any demand was made by the 2nd Partywith the 1st Party. There is no conciliation proceeding conducted with 1st Party and as such failure report submitted by Conciliation Officer on the basis of the demand letter ofthe 2nd Party treating him as an employee ofthe 1st Party has no meaning . The stand of the Ist Party is that, 2nd Party is employee of the Contractor hence dispute under Section 2(k) and Section 2A of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 will come into picture as and when the demand is made by the Union or Workman on the employer which is rejected by the employer . Here there was no demand ofthe employee or by Union against the 1st Party i.e. Authority. Besides there was statement on that point made by the 2nd Party where he say that, at any point of time either 2nd Party or Union did not approached the Ist Party for employment of the 2nd or on the termination of the 2nd Party. Besides it is not the case of the 2nd Party that, he was terminated by issuing termination order by Ist Party. On the contrary it is his case that, because he
9929509-21 1532
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )]
AWARD
नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2009
The matrix of the facts as culled out from the proceedings are as under:
का.आर. 780.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय विमानपत्तन प्राधिकरण के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय , सं. 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या CGIT-2/ 73-2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L- 11012/8 /2000 - IR (M) dated 31st July , 2000 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
[सं. एल-11012/8/2000-आईआर (एम. ] कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी
NewDelhi , the 5th March, 2009
"Whether the action of the Management ofAirports Authority of India, International Airports Div . , Mumbai by recording incorrect date of birth i.e. instead of 15-8-1944 to 13-3-1942 isjustified or not ? If not, what relief the workman, Mr. E.D. Mane , Mechanic is entitled to ? "
S.O. 780.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.CGIT -2/ 73 of 2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- Labour Court, No. 2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Airport Authority of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on5-3-2009.
2. Claim Statement is filed under the signature of the Secretary ofthe Union at Exhibit 8 stating and contending that, Workman involve in the reference i.e. E.D. Mane,which we hereinafter call as " Mane " was ex - service man . Said Manejoined Army on 13-3-1963 after China war of 1962. As there was acute shortage of Military forces Government recruited Jawans at large scale in Army by arranging number of Camps at remote places like Tasgaon where others and Mane were recruited.
[No. L - 11012/8 /2000- IR (M)] KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2, MUMBAI
3. Itis the case of the Union that , in the Army record birth date of Mane was recorded as 13th March , 1942 . However, actually his birth date is 15-8-1944 . Even he submitted his School Leaving Certificate to support that birth date i.e. 15-8-1944 .
Present: A.A. LAD, Presiding Officer
Reference No. CGIT- 2/73 of 2000
Employers in relation to the Management of AirportAuthority of India
The General Manager ( P &A) , Airports Authority of India, International Airports Div. , Mumbai Airport, Mumbai -400099
...First Party
V/s.
Their Workmen
4. When he joined AAI after retirement from Army in 1979 he brought it to the notice of Authorities to enter his birth date as 15-8-1944 but Authority recorded it as 13-3-1942 relying on the military, service record. Actually Mane was not aware of the birth date recorded as 13-3-1942. When he applied for house loan in 1994 he noticed his birth date recorded against his name as birth date 13-3-1942 . Relying on the said birth date he was asked to retire from the Airports Authority of India . Even he tried to bring it to the notice of the authorities that , his birth date is 15-8-1944 and allow him to work on the basis ofthat birth date but he was not permitted to work . Union also submit that , birth date of Mane be recorded as 15-8-1944 instead of 13-3-1942 and benefot of said be given to him.
The Secretary, AAI Mazdoor Sangh , 25/32, Ibrahim Mansion , Dr.B.R. Ambedkar Road, Parel, Mumbai.
... Second Party
Appearances:
Forthe Employer : S/Shri Shamrao S. Patil and A.S. Patil , Advocates .
For the Workmen: Mr. S. Mukherji , Advocate.
Date ofreserving the Award :22-7-2008.
Dateofpassingthe Award : 29-1-2009 .
5. This is disputed by the 1st Party by filing reply at Exhibit 9 making out the case that , Union cannot ask to change the birth date of Mane from 13-3-1942 to 15-8-1944 . Said birth date was recorded relying on the Military record from where Mane retired . Now Mane cannot seek benefit on the basis of birth date as 15th August, 1944. It is further stated that , dispute raised by the Union is not tenable and maintainable under Section 2 (K) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. It is contended that, the dispute is not espoused by sufficient number of members ofthe Union. It is further stated that , after about 14 years , 1533
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
and request todecide said point with the help ofevidence. Said request was not made by Mane and now Union cannot pray for Mane in this fashion .
Union is asking to change the birth date of Mane which Union cannot ask and the benefit of it cannot be given to Mane.Mane did not apply with the Authorities to change his birth date. There was no separate application from Mane requesting Authority to change his birth date instead of 13-3-1942 to 15-8-1944. Besides Mane kept silent for number ofyears and allowed the records to carry his birth datewhichwas enrolled in the Military service record. Even School Leaving Certificate produced by Mane to support his birth date of 15-8-1944 are not consistent and reliable since there are number of discrepancies in those records producedbyMane, it is submitted that, Mane cannot seek reliefon the request of the Union .
6. Rejoinder is filed by the Union at Exhibit 10 stating that, the contentions of the Authorities is not worth to consider and prayer prayed by Union to change the birth date ofMane be considered.
7. In view ofthe above pleadings my Ld. Predecessor framed the Issues at Exhibit 11 which I answer as under:
FINDINGS
ISSUES
No
1. Whether the union proves that workman can change the date ofbirth in service record from 13-3-1942 to 15-8-1944 by submitting School Lesving Certificate afterthe period of 14 years from joining the service ?
No
2. Whether the action of the Manage- ment ofAirports Authority of India, International Airports Div. , Mumbai it'refusing to record the date of birthofworkman as 15-8-1944 in the service book is justified ?
Yes
2(a) Whether the Reference is bad Under Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ?
No
3. Whether the workman is entitled to any relief , if so what relief?
REASONS:
9. To prove that, Union placed reliance on the affidavit in lieu of examiantion- in-chief filed at Exhibit 16 and another affidavit filed at Exhibit 16-A, through General Secretary of the Union who states that , case of Mane require to consider relying on the evidence brouglif on record. In the cross this witness states that , he has no personal knowledge about the subject matter of the reference. He states that, relying on Mane's statement he supports his case . He states that, he has no personal knowledge about the birth date ofMane recorded in Military record. He admits that, Mane submitted Military record with theAuthorities while joining the Ist Party. He states that, he is relying on the School Leaving Certificate and LICdocuments shown by Mane. He states that, in 1994 for the first time Mane asked Authority to change his birth date. He admits that, there is discrepancy in the school leavecertificates produced by Mane. He admits that, Mane is now retiredon 31-3-2002. He also admits that , Mane got all his dues at the time of his retirement. Then Unión relied onthe affidavit ofMane which is filed in lieu ofexamination -in- chief at Exhibit 46 who gave story about his employment and how he entered in the enrolment with theAuthority.He also put a story that, he has applied for change of birth date and necessary documents were produced by him . He states that, documents were producedwhich were not considered to change his birth date from 13-3-1942 to 15-8-1944 . He also made out the case that, in the record of Insurance Policy, his birth date ismentioned as 15-8-1944 . He brought all these documents to the notice of the Authority but his prayer was not considered . In the cross this witness states that , he has not documentary evidence to show that recruitment took place at the time of China War as stated by him in the affidavit. He admits that , person below the age of21 cannot be recruited in the Army . He admits that , he never complained with the Military authorities regarding wrong birth date recorded as 13-3-1942. He admits that, he has not applied separately with the authorities requesting to consider his grievance of birth date and correctit . He admits that , he has not submitted school Leaving Certificate or Birth Certificate when he took up the job with the Authorities .
ISSUE NO . 1 & 2:
10. Against that, Authority examined Maya Lavania by filing her affidavit in lieu of examination -in -chief at Exhibit 55 who stated that, there was no prayer ofMane to change his birth date . Mane did not brought it to the notice of the Authority at any point of time by applying strictly forthe said change . In the cross she admits that, Authority is not claming that , School Leaving Certificate produced byMane is fabricated one.Even this witness admits that, Mane requested Authority to change his birth date . When question was put to the witness as to why Authority did not rely on the School Leaving Certificate towhich this witness states that, Mane was admitted in the school in 1952 and when he left school , in his School leaving certificate, it was stated that, in 1956 still he was in the Ist Standard. Then 1st Party closed evidence by filing Exhibit 8. Union invites that , birth date enrolled ofMane in the records of the Airports Authority of India as 13-3-1942 require to change as 15-8-1944 . According to UnionAuthority recorded his birth date as 13-3-1942, Mane was askingAuthority to change his birth date to 15-8-1944 from 13-3-1942 . However, it was not considered by it . According to Union birth date of Mane 15-8-1944 require to change in the service record of Mane maintained by the Authority. Said is disputedby the Authority stating that Mane cannot pray to change his birth date after such a longperiod. It is the case ofthe Authority that Mane joined Authority after retirement from Military in 1979 and in 1994 heprayed to record his birth date as 15-8-1944 instead of 13-3-1942. Besides Mane did not applied with the Authority
992G1/09-22 1534
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28, 2009/CHAITRA 7 , 1931
[PART 11-Sec. 3 (ii) ] 57 and submittedwritten arguments at Exhibit 59 to reply the oral arguments submitted by Advocate ofthe Union .
11. Here Union is relying on various " School Leaving Certificates " and state that , these School Leaving Certificates are more than suffisient to claim change of birth date from 13-3-1942 to 15-8-1944. Whereas Authorities argued that those certificates have discrepancy and as such are not reliable. Besides recruitment age of 21 in Military does not permit Mane to claim his birth date as 15-8-1944 sincebirth date 15-8-1944 does not permit Mane complete21 years to be recruited in Amy in 1963.
on whichUnion is relying and when it is asking us to rely on it to give benefit to Mane in nty condered view, these School Leaving Cetificames are inconsistent to each other and does not permit us to rely and accept it .No doubt as pointed out by Advocate of Authorities that , with theArmy in 1963 does not permit now Make to claim birth date as 15-8-1944 . When Mane was wirolled in 1903 with the Army at the age of21 when his birth date must be of 13-3-1942 and cannot be 15-8-1944. So if we consider the evidence lead by both logleslly case made by Union does not permit us toaccept its case and accept that birth date of Mane isis 15-8-1944 and which cannot be of 13-3-1942 . So I conclude that, birth date of Mane must be 13-3-1942 and cannot be 15-8-1964 na smimed by the Union. When Union unable to establish birthdate as claimed by Maneas 15-8-1944, must be recorded in the Authority's record has no force and moaning when Authority decided not to change the birth date of Mane after 14 years . As per the date of recruitment with the Authority . I am of the opinion that , Authority was justified in not accepting the case ofthe Union or the case of Mane to treat his birth date as 15-8- 1944 instead of 13-3-1942. So I answer these issues to thateffect.
ISSUE NO. 2(a)
12. Admittedly Mane was recruitedby the Army in 1963. If we calculate the age of Mane in March 1963 considering 2birth dates i.c. oncas 15-8-1944 and the other onewhich is on record i.c. 13-3-1942 we find , birth date claimed by Mane as 15-8-1944 dees not permit Maneto laim that , he was of 21 years when be was taken in Army in 1963. Ifwe count the age of Mane in 1963 at the timeof recruitment in Asmy his birth date as 13-3-1942 which is in the Army record and carried on in the Authority record, pernait Mane to claire that , he was 21 years whenhe was recruited in theArmy/Military. So apparently from the year ofrecruitment in the Army Le. in March, 1963 said event does not permit Mane or Union to say that, birth date of Mane may be 15-8-1944 . On the contrary it take usto conclude that, birth date of Mane ought to have been 13-3-1942 other wise Mens cannotbecome qualified tobe recruited in the Army in the year 1963.
14. Authority contends that, Reference is not maintainable since it does not faff within the definition of2 (K) of Industrial Disputés Act, 1947. Admittedly Union has not produced any resolution or any decision taken in themeeting of the Union to show that the subject matter of Mane was diaguased in the Union and majority ofUnion members gave support to raise the issue. Ronides it is not in dispute under the provisions of Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as benefit of this dispute will go to only Mane and it will not help to any other employee.Besides it is rightly pointed out bytheAuthority that , in case of individual dispute it is duity ofthe Union to establish that, most of the sections of the members ofthe Union have given support to raise such a dispute . when such adispute is espoused by the Union admitedly said dispute is espoused by the union on the basis of the majority of the members of the Union but no evidence is ledby the Union to show that there is support from other members of the Union . Besides if such a, dispute is under Section 2A , and it comes under the said Section , when dispute is pertaining to werkopen and his employer creating with or arising out of dischange , ' , ' retrenchment ' or' tarmination' ofthe services of thethe woskmen . Here it is not the sass of the Union ther , Mane was discharged, dismissed, tomaked or tecmitiated kunt the dispute raised is ofebenge ofbirth date ofMane so definitely it does not within the orphit of Section 24 ofthe Industriel Disputes All Act, 1947.
13. Besides, ist Party's Advocate tried to point out that, there are number of discrepancies in the School leaving Certificate produced by Mane . One school Leaving certificate produped is dated 16-5-1989 at Serial No. 5, page 14with Exhibit 13. Another one is produced at Serial No.1 ofExhibit 12 which is exhibited as 43 dated 12-7-1994, then third one is produced at Serial No. 1, page2 oflist ofdocuments which is dated 6-10-1994. If these are compared with bash others, we find his School Leaving Certificate bears covering letter dated 6-1-1993 at Exhibit 13 , whereas he was recruited with the Authorities in January, 1979. It reveals that Mane did not produce this School Leaving Certificate when he was taken bythe Authority since date of covering letter is dated 6-1-1993 . Another School Leaving Certificate of 1989 as there was no School Leaving Certificate with the concerned workman Mane before 1989, when certificate was not withManebefore 1989 where question arises ofManeto produce it on 1-1-1979when be joined with the Authority? Besides as per School Leaving Certificates ManeAppears tohave been admitted in sahool in 1952. However, School Leaving Certificate reveals that, in 1956 after 4 years he was shown in Ist Standard which is not acceptable to any logic as person will not be in Std. I for four years as mentioned in the School Leaving Certificates on which he is asking us to refer. Bebidas in one certificate in respect of "progress in study" is mentioned as " good " , whereas in other School Leaving Certificate it is shown as " so so" and in third one it is not mentioned anything about his progress. So apparently these School Leaving Certificates
15. Mervover Ld. Advocate for the 1st party placed reliance on the eitition published in 1999 III (Supi .) LLJ page 571 ofour Hon'ble High Court in the case of Iqbal A. Kamaruddin ve P. L. Magonder and unr , where it is observed that, employer can raise the issue that there ladusel lapato' within the meaning ofSection 1535 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]
Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial... Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Warehousing Corporation , and their workman, which was received by the Central Govemment on 5-3-2009 .
[No. L-42012/3 /1997- IR, (M)] KAMAL BAKHUR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Reference No. 22 of 1997 .
Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Central Warehousing Corporation AND
TheirWorkman
Present: Mr. Justice C. P. Mishra, PresidingOfficer...
APPEARANCE:
2(K) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 even before Tribunal . Another citation pulished in 1961 II LLJ page 436 of Apex Court in the case of Bombay Union of Journalists vs The 'Hindu ' , Bombay where it is observed that, Union must have the support of members which is supporting the dispute. He also placed reliance on the citation published in 1970 II LLJ page 132 of Apex Court in the case of Workmen of Indian Express Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. V/ s . The Management of Indian Express Newspapers Pvt . Ltd. , another citation published in 1962 (5) FLR page 144 of Madras High Court in the case of Visalakshi Mills Ltd. vs. Labour Court, Madurai , where it is observed that, " the individual dispute to become Industrial dispute . It must have collective suport from the substantial members of workers of that Union " . He alsoplaced reliance on 19651 LLJ page 95 where Madras High Court in the case ofNellai Cotton Mills vs. Labour Court, Madurai observed that, It is not sufficient that dispute raised is sponsored by Union . It is observed that , in that case most of the employees must support the dispute. He also placed reliance on the copy ofunreported judgment of our Hon'ble High Court, in Writ Petition No. 1133 of 1992, in the case of Joaquis francis F. Tellis vs. The International Airports Authority of India and anr. All these case laws does not permit me to say that, Reference is maintainable in the resent form. So I answer this issue to that effect .
Onbehalf ofthe Mr. S. K. Majumder, Advocate. Management
+
Onbehalf ofthe Mr. G. C. Chakraborty, Advocate. Workmen
16. In view ofthe discussions made above I conclude that, the 2nd Party has neither made out the case to support change ofbirth date nor concerned workman . So I conclude that, Mane is not entitled to any relief . Hence, the order.
ORDER
State: West Bengal Industry: Warehousing Dated: 16th February, 2009 .
AWARD
Reference is rejected with no order as to its costs .
Bombay, 29th January, 2009
A. A. LAD, Presiding Officer
By Order No. L 42012 / 3 / 97 - IR ( Misc. ) dated 30-6-1997 the Government of India, Ministry ofLabour in exercise of its powers under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) and (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च , 2009
"Whether the action of the management of Central Warehousing Corporation , Calcutta in terminating the services of Shri S. S. Saha w.e.f. 23-5-95. is justified? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled?"
का.आ. 781. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल वेयरहाऊसिंग कोरपोरेशन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद मे केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , कोलकत्ता के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 22/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल -42012/3/ 1997- आईआर( एम ) ]
कमल. बाखरु , डेस्क अधिकारी
New Delhi, the 5th March , 2009
2. This reference has been made at the instance of Shri Shyam Sundar Saha the concerned workman in this case. The case of the workman as it appearsfrom his written statement is that he was engaged as a Chowkidar in the Central Warehousing Corporation , hereinafter to be referred as the Corporation at Ghusuri and then hewas promoted as L.D.C. and was later designated as Warehouse Assistant Grade - II and was posted at Central Warehouse at Budge Budge on 1-9-1988 . He was working satisfactorily and by an office order dated 17-7-1989 he was directed to look after the oil godown there under Shri A.R. Majumder, T.A. The Manager ofthe Warehouse was one Shri A. K. Sharma. A survey in respect ofthe S.O. 781.- In pursuanceuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.22/2007 )ofthe CentralGovernment Industrial Tribunal Labour Court, 1536
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 28 , 2009/CHAITRA 7 , 1931
[PART I-SEC . 3( 1 )
further made prayer to the Government ofindia, Ministry ofLabour against his illegal retrenchment and the matter was accordingly referred to this Tribunal . It is stated that termination ofhis service is illegal and he is entitled tobe reinstated in service with all back wages and benefits.
stock of the Refined Rapeseed Oil stored in the godown washeldon two occasions , i.e. , 31-10-1989 and 9-4-1990. It is stated that one Shri G. B. Mukherjee had conducted the survey inspection on 28-3-1990 and Shri A. K. Mukherjee did it on 26-10-1990 . In the meantime a portion of godown under Central Warehouse , Budge Budge was dehired in 1990 which was earlier hired in 1987 for the purpose of storing Refined Rapeseed Oil and other commodities . It is further stated that after the physical verification of stock of the R.R.S. Oil the then Regional Manager of the Corporation sent two persons to the said godown for enquiry and report regarding the alleged unauthorized delivery of 30 barrels of R.R.S. Oil and on thebasis of a complaint dated 5-12-1990 lodged by the SecurityOfficer of the Corporation a case as registered at the Budge Budge Police Station as Case No. 263 dated 6-12-1990 and the workman was placed under suspension by order dated 12-12-1990. In the suspension order his Head Quarters was declared at Aizwał and against this order the workman moved the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta in a writ petition and the writ petition was allowed and the Hon'ble High Court directed the Corporation not totransfer the workman to Aizwal and the Corporation was given liberty to proceed with the workman as per law. It is also stated that the Corporation made a claim from the Insurance Company stating loss of 30 barrels and subsequently it also added loss of20 barrels more. It is also stated that by office memo No. 2047 dated 24-9-1991 a departmental proceeding was ordered to be started against the workman and he as directed to submit a written statement. He accordingly submitted his written statement denying the aliegation and charge against him . However, it is stated that when some mistake was detected in the FIR earlier lodged on behalf of the Corporation , another FIRwas lodged on 5-11-1992 in continuation ofthe earlier FIR dated 6-12-1990 . During 5 years the Budge Budge Police could not collect any material in the case and ultimately the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate discharged the workman from the case, but the departmental proceeding was initiated during which the Corporation produced witnesses and documents toprove the charges against the workman. However, accordingto the workman the management failed in proving the charges against him, but the Corporation held the workman guilty for contravention of Regulation 39( 1 ) read with Regulation 40( 1 ) (V) and (X) ofthe Central Warehousing Corporation (Staff) Regulation , 1986 for committing offence of theft ofRefined Rapeseed Oil and the workman was removed from serviced by office memo dated 23-5-1995 . According to the workman the said termination order is illegal , malafide, vindictive , arbitrary, whimsical and without jurisdiction and , therefore, is void and mounts to unfair labour practice by the Corporation . It is also stated that the workman made representation to the higher authorities ofthe Corporation for consideration of his case, but it did not have any effect . The workman also
3.Awritten statement was also filed on behalf of the management in which the maintainability of the reference was also challenged . However , the management denied the allegations made on behalf of theworkman parawise and it is stated that the workman concerned was initially appointed as Dusting Operator in the Corporation on 28-5-1970 and not as a Chowkidar as mentioned in his written statement . It is also stated that subsequently he was promoted as L.D.C. WA - II andwas posted at the Warehouse at Budge-Budge . It is also stated that it is incorrect to say that the workman was rendering efficient and loyal service to the Corporation .However, it is stated that the workman was found guilty of the charges framed against him in the departmental proceeding in the report of the Enquiry Officer and the punishment has not been awarded on thebasis ofany police report and Court case . It is stated that as the stock in the godown was covered under an insurancepolicy as per normal procedure, the Corporation had claimed the loss from the Insurance Company. It is further stated that the departmental proceeding is entirely different exercise than the police case and the departmental proceeding was initiatedwhen a prima facie case was established against the workman through departmental investigation and not in connection with the FIR or insurance claim . It is further stated that since the stock in the godown are generally covered by insurance policy, for any loss , theft or pilferage , the management had to lodge claim with the insurance company and because Police Case is necessary for the claim, a casewas also lodged with the local Police , but all thesehad nothing to do with the departmental proceeding. It isalso furtherstated that in the departmental proceeding the Corporation produced witnesses and documents to prove the charges against the workman and actually the charges were found substantiated during the enquiry and accordingly the enquiry report was submitted by the EnquiryOfficer. It is also stated that during the enquiry all reasonable opportunities were provided to the delinquent to defend his case and he also availed such opportunities by participating in the enquiry and he failed to prove his innocence . According to the management the enquiry was conducted in free and fair manner according to the principles of natural justice and onthebasis ofthe enquiry report the workman was found guilty and termination order was passed . Therefore , it is stated that neither the termination order is malafide, nor illegal and the enquiry was also properly conducted and the report was based on the materials produced before theEnquiry Officer during enquiry .
1537 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28 , 2009/चैत्र 7 , 1931
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4. It appears that though the workman did not state anything against the enquiry in his written statement, after submission ofthe written statement of the management, a rejoinder was filed by him in which he challenged the fairness of the enquiry by stating that the enquiry was sham, stage-managed and in violation of principles of natural justice and fair play. Management also filed an objection against the same challenging the allegations made in the rejoinder regarding the fairness of the enquiry for the first time in the rejoinder of theworkman.
5. In view of the settled principles of low applicable to this type of case the issue of validity of the enquiry was considered first and after recording evidence ofboth the parties and hearing them in the matter this Tribunal by an order dated 3rd October, 2002 held that the domestic enquiry as held in this case was fair and in view of the provisions of Section 11A of the Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 the parties were given opportunity to make their submission on the point of adequacy or otherwise of the punishment inflicted against the workman concerned in this case and the parties have been so heard.
6.On the perusal ofthe aforesaid facts it is evident that the issus ofvalidity of enquiry was considered by this Tribunal and it was held that the enquiry so conducted by theEnquiryOfficer and the report, Ext . W-4 submittedby him' in this connection did not suffer from any illegality as such and there was no violation of the principles of natural justice in conducting the said enquiry against the workman. It has also been found that in the enquiry report about the charges so framed against the workman that they were so based on facts and evidence led thereon and the report, Ext. W-4 did not suffer from any illegality or said to be perverse so that it could require any Interference by the Tribunal on any such ground as it was so argued on behalf of the workmen in this regard. The matter after this has now been placed for hearing the parties on the point of adequacy or otherwise of the punishment so inflicted against the concerned workman in this regard. Learned Advocates for the parties have accordingly placed their respective argument in this connecton.
Usman & Anr. (1938 Lab I.C. 1739) wheroin it was held that if the Labour Court after evaluating the gravity of misconduct held that the punishment of termination of service is disproportionately heavy in relation to misconduct and exercise its discretion , the Court, in the absence of any important legal principle would mot. undertake to re-examine the question of adequacy or inadequacy ofmaterial for interference as it was so held by Labour Court in this regard. Yet, another docisipe of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Ved Prakash Gupta v. Delton Cable India (P) Ltd. (AIR 1984 SC 914) was alse cited to say that the punishment so awarded to the workman in case is shockingly disproportionate regard being had to the charge framed against him and no responsible. employer would ever impose punishment ofdismissel in like circumtances to the employee , victimization or unfair labour practice could very well be so inferred from the conduct of the management in awarding the extreme : punishment ofdismissal for a flimsy charge of abuse of some worker or officer ofthe management by the workman in this regard. The order of termination ofthe workman's service as such on these facts and ground was held to be invalid and unsustainable and he was also held to be so entitled to a relief of reinstatement with full back wages and also other benefits so available to him including the continuity of service in this connection . In this case, it is evident that conclusion of the Labour Court and the EnquiryOfficer was also found to have not acted properly in conducting the proceedings and the workman had also not been given a full proper opportunity as was SO required by law to enquire into the charges so framed against the workman and also not found to be serious one.Accordingly, the aforesaid observations were made therein for passing the aforesaid order in favour of the workman. Relying on this it has been therefore so argued onbehalf of the workman that in the present case too the alleged charges so framed against the workman are not serious one as the so called unauthorized delivery made by him was so made along with one other workman too and the case against him is not proved by any legal evidence of positive nature . The Police report which was also lodged did not find any such evidence against the workman and so he had been so discharged from the criminal case after its investigation. It is also submitted. that the other co -worker on similar facts was not given any such punishment though he was also se charged on the same set of facts like the present workman who.. however has been so punished by the order of termination .. ofhis service on that very ground.
8. Learned Advocate for the management in this connection has argued that the aforesaid claim and contention of the workman is otherwise on facts and charges so framed against him . He was charged for the unauthorized delivery of 30 barrels of RRS Oil and as the enquiry was so conducted against him during the ..
7. It is submitted on behalf of the workman that the punishment which has been so imposed upon the workman is too harsh shockingly disproportionate to the charges looking at the gravity ofthe misconduct so alleged against him and so the Tribunal has got its power and jurisdiction under Section 11A of the Act to evaluate the severity of misconduct and also to assess whether the punishment imposed bythe employer is commensurate with the gravity of the misconduct or not as this power is specifically conferred upon this Tribunal to do so under Section 11A ofthe Act . In support of it he has also placed reliance on a decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Management of Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd. , Bangalore v . Mohd.
1538
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 24, 20MMCHAITRA 7, 1931
[PART II-Snc. 3(ii) ]
for the prowed anisennduct of theft was not unjustified-as tomerit istutusmesby the Tribunal under Section 11A of the Industriak:Binputtes Act. The offence of theft, which was deditted by the employee cancsnoed, showed that he was diebonent and his suitability and reliability to continuolije nejde might be affected by that ressen and would balio dehanning on kir contract of service and es such) the anideliacsimos angled ground for diamisping the simphippereantsinod from the service. The fact that the workanen hud sonininda keng periodiofumblantisiod service and the property stolen was worth only Rs.150 did not justify on kuponparmishment. Byone attarmpt to steal the cmplayer's plegarty on the part of the workman was a seriturichage and deserved nothing short ofdismissal . If the worlumba wins allowed to get away with a lesser mistusetunior Boatian 11A it would be very difficult for the dumplejon to mwaintain discipline in the organization. Such bring thedichandorkerstbe dirutissal oftheworkasan was perceded by afair and pooper enquiry, there was no justification for interfoconco vitly the onder of dismissal under BestianiAefthwindustrial Disputes Act. It isalso submitted by hish that morely an acquittal from a criminal case does not have the effect of nullifying the decision bakenolu the departinbutal pricoodings as they operate in differentiebreansideration.For this he referred to the decision of the Houlble Supreme Court in Divisional Controllin GSR TVC. v . Dedar Suthar (2007 AIR SCW 1331) Inthia conecktion reliance Has also been placed on the decision of the blon'ble Apex Court' in Mahinda de Mirinda Ladybl. B. Narawade ( (2005) 3 SC6136) to any that the scopo and discution ofthe Tribunal under Sectioned Admeto be exercised in a limitedwayand it is not palintitekand it can only be exercised if the punishment is so diapnopartionate to the gravity of misconduct or there is existpace of any mitigating cirundiness which puquive roduntion ofthe circumstances or pastoundect:ofthewaakmancyhich may persuade the Labour Ospettomeduca punishment otherwise not .
Considering the afensaid facts and legal position departmental proceedings, the Cotporation to prove its charges produced both oral and also the decumentary evidence to prove the said chugre against him for this purpese. The workman in this assstion had also been given all reasonable opstetunity to dedund himmelkand be availed it. After this the enquilyrepuit Ext, W-4 which was so submittedby the Enquiry Officer had fatty considered the entire facts and analysed the evidence in this regard and found the worluyun gality of the churges so framed against him, i.e. , having committed the offence of pilferageby misappropriating the property of the Commapy in this regard.It was found therein that the workman unauthorizedly had respeικά 200 serviceable bamboo mats, also from the wanhouse and also had misappropriated 50 barrels ofRid Oil ofSFC on different period from the oil godown sitthasoby bed caused a financial loss ofRs . 139000 or as spéitvine a clear case of misconduct and dishonesty on his put. Besides that he also did not maintain properly the records like daily transaction and other records and tansby neglooted his duties as well in this connection. He was also found to have falsified the records in his custody , ive., attendance register godown opening/cleoling ricordate, and did not report the matter on his part to the ladyut anthurities when they had so visited the weather the inspection of the godown and to make phyntial Verification on the goods therein . The Enquiry Offer ondasted the enquiry by recording the statements of wuhuber of witotoses and had also gone through the doctanente so produçod before him during the enquiry and gave s positive findings to the charges soprovedagainst the workman-by saying that the workman in collusion with others had misappropriated 500 barrels of RRS Oil and also conducted other number of irregularities as he had been so chuirged: Theworkawan on his part did not produce any sash defence during the enquiry so that his act and bositfide could be so prove otherwise about the unauthorized rawnction that had so taken place during that period. The report, Ext . W-4 submittedby the Enquiry Officer therefore was also so placed before the disciplinary authoritywho are considered the facts in quite detail manner as contained in his order dated 19-5-1995 and then the impugned order dated 23-5-1995 was so passed against the workman of terminating the services of the wovicatan as the alleged misconduct was of committing theft by the workman. In view of that, it is argued by the learned Advecate for the management that the order of dismissal passed is perfectly justified and proper to have been so passed against the workman and this Tribunal has got no power and jurisdiction to make interference to the punishment so awarded against the workman in this regard.
9. Insupport of it he has placed reliance on a decision oftheHon'ble Calcutta High Court in Wimco Sramik Union v. Seventh Industrial Tribunal de Ors . (1987 Lab. I. C. 77) to saythat the order ofdismissal passed against the workman
as it isscorefistvediby the learned Advocates on either side.. it is evident that the Tribunal in exercise of its power of judicial review not normally interfere with the quantum of punishment and also the determination of proportionality to therolunges and piniekment so imposed can be invoked only under certain situation. While exercising such discretionaze jurisdiction , ne daubt, it is open to the Tribunal to stitute one punishmentby another, but as helt i mamber of panes for this the Tribunal has got a limitodjurisdiction in this regard . The Hon'ble Apex Court repeatedly has laiddown for this that such interference at the hands ofthe Tribunal should be interalla on arriving at a finding that no reasonable person could inflict such punishment in the fasts of a particular case . The Tribunal may further mere exercise its jurisdiction when relevant facts are not takom inte consideration by the management 1539 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 28, 2009/चैत्र 7, 1931
which would have a direct bearing on the question of against him . During the enquiry it was found and proved onthebasis of the documents that proper entries were not made in the godown opening and closing register by the concerned workman who was entrusted with the job of Godown Clerk at that time. This mistake was also admitted by the concerned workman in his statement which was marked as P-33 in the enquiry. Besides that cuttings and overwritings in the documents P-8 , P- 10, P-26, P-9 and -2 were also found to be there which was not so controverted by the concerned workman to prove it otherwise in this connection. There has been a positive finding recorded by theEnquiryOfficer that the workman failed to maintain the aforesaid relevant records properly and therefore the charges were found to be so established against him in all respect. It was also found that one gate pass book was used only for unauthorized transaction for a period ofmore than three months , although on such occasion another gate pass book was also in existence for authorized transaction meaning thereby two gate pass books were so maintained in the warehouse by the concerned workman with ulterior motive for committing theft and misappropriation for which he had been so charged and the findings recorded by the Enquiry Officer about the aforesaid factual aspect of the commission of misappropriation and theft is based on both oral and documentary evidence which was so recorded during the departmental proceedings . The disciplinary authority had also considered the aforesaid facts and evidence led by the management and the findings recorded by the Enquiry Officer andfound that the concerned workman had failed to maintain the basic integrity and devotion to duty and thereby contravened the Regulation 39( i) read with Regulation 40( i ) , ( v) and (ix) of the Central Warehousing. Corporation (Staff) Regulations , 1986 in this regard. The charges so framed against him were found to be so proved and in view ofthat the penalty of removal from servicewas so imposed on the concerned workman,
quantum ofpunishment otherwise not. Looking at the facts ofthe present case and the charges so framed against the workman in this connection it is evident that the workman concerned was charged for having committed misappropriation of the various goods belonging to the Corporation and also to have committed fraud, forgery etc. In maintaining the records for which he was so entrusted by the Corporation . The evidence against the concerned workman Shri S. S. Saha was that on the relevant dates 14-11-1990 and 1-12-1990 he was the Godown Clerk ofthe oil godown . It also goes to show that 20 barrels of oil were unauthorizedly delivered on the aforesaid dates and the transaction was made through gate pass . The witness T. K. Dutta, PW- 11 had stated that the word empty was written on these gate passes after taking back the same from the jute mills authorities . This fact was proved otherwise by the statement given by PW- 10 during the enquiry wherein he had confirmed that he did not replace 30 barrels in the morning of 1st December, 1990. It was also stated by him that he never used the Truck No. WB 4207 for transaction. He was an unofficial witness . It was also found that the delivery of30 barrels of oil before office hours was attended bythe concerned workman who also had put his signature onthe gate passes and the other documents that had been produced during the enquiry. Shri Saha had given his statement and he stated that he did not recognize the person who came along with the truck to supply 30 barrels in the morning of 1st December, 1990. The Chowkidar on dutywas also instructed by the concerned workman to remain in the office so as to conceal the unauthorized delivery of30 barrels of oil in the morning of 1st December, 1990 when Shri Das himselfwas the Godown Clerk of the oil godown at that time. It was also found that the concerned workman had colluded with other employees and they had allmisappropriated 50 barrels of STC oil during that period. The persons named by the concerned workman in this connection to rebut the claim of the Corporation had not been so examined so as to prove the aforesaid positive facts to be otherwise. This factual position about commission of theft and misappropriation of the goods as foundbythe Enquiry Officer by considering the statements given by the number of witnesses confirm the act of involvement of the concerned workman and particularly hispresence during the relevant period before the office hourswhen the alleged act had so taken place. No doubt , the FIR had also been lodged in this connection , but it is immaterial whether the charges were so proved or not during criminal proceedings as the departmental proceedings can verywell independently be undertaken and even if the criminal case is not proved or the workman is not held guilty for want of material evidence, still he can be charged for taking action in the departmental proceedings and in casethis collusion or misappropriation are so found on the basis of the oral and documentary evidence so collected during enquiry, he can be charged and action can be taken
11. Considering the aforesaid fact and conduct of the workman it is evident that it is a case of theft, fraud and dishonesty on the part of the workman for which he had been so charged. In industrial law the acts of theft, fraud and dishonesty apart from being exposed to the penal liabilityunder the criminal law have also been treated as acts of misconduct justifying dismissal as it was so held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in 1965. II LLJ 53 (J. K. Cotton and Spinning & Weaving Mills Co. Ltd vs. Its Workmen) . Criminal law makes special provision for dealing with such offence . The aforesaid act committed towards strangers may not make a workman guilty of industrial misconduct , but in a case where such an act is committed by a workman against his employer or his co-employees , the employermay have the justification oftreating it as an act ofmisconduct and discharge or dismiss him from service for loss ofconfidence, The offence of theft committed by an employee shows that he is dishonest and suitability 1540
[PART B-Sac. 3( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 24, 2000MCHAITRA 7, 1931
so that the same could require any interfrance by this Talkumal absich bas also get quite a Hmbed jurisdiction and pavent to make such interference under Section 11A of thai act as the legal position about it is nowwell-settled as referred to above for the same in this connection.
and reliability to continue hins in sunvice may be affected by that reason and will have abaming on the contract of serviceas it has been so laid down in Hew Victoria Mills Co. Ltd. v. Labour Court, 1970.kab. L. C. 428 (Allahabad). One of the basic requicament what an employer would expect tobe satisfied from itsaspingen is loyalty tesweeds him, ie , the employee is expected to promote the employer's interest in connection with which he has been employed and necessary implication will be that the workman undertook to serve his master with good faith.
13. In view of the above , the action of the maningiheit ofCentral Warehousing Corporation, Kolkata the services ofShri S. S. Saha efect from 23-5-1995 is held to be justified. The workman , sccdedlingly, is not entitled to any relief.
This is myAward.
Dated Kalkats, 16th Fabrary,2009
12. In view ofthe aforesaid facts and the act dose by the concemed wordsman for which he has been so changed and feeed guilty, the order passed phout terminating his services cannot be said to be illegal or merally unjustified
C. P. MISHRA, PresidingOfficer Prised by the Manager, Govt. of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi- 110064 and Published by the Controller ofPattentions, Delhi - 110054.