This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

REGD . NO . D. L. (N) 04 /0007/2003-05 रजिस्ट्री सं० डी० एल० ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

नई दिल्ली , अप्रैल 12- अप्रैल 18 , 2009 , शनिवार/चैत्र 22 -चैत्र 28 , 1931 NEW DELHI , APRIL 12- APRIL 18, 2009 , SATURDAY/CHAITRA 22-CHAITRA 28, 1931 सं. 16 ] No. 161

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II- खण्ड 3- उप-खण्ड ( ii) PART II Section 3- Sub- section ( ii )

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Revenue)

वित्त मंत्रालय (राजस्व विभाग )

Office ofthe Chief Commissioner of Central Excise (DZ)

New Delhi , the 17th February , 2009

No. 1/2009 -Cus .

केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क के मुख्य आयुक्त का कार्यालय ( दिल्ली क्षेत्र ) नई दिल्ली , 17 फरवरी, 2009 सं. 1/2009-सी. शु.

S.O. 931. In exercise of the powers conferred on meby Notification No. 33 /94- Cus (NT) , dated 1-7-94 of the Government of India , Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi , I herebydeclare village Nizampur situated on Tauru- Rewari in Tehsil Tauru , Distt . Mewat (Haryana) to be a rehousing Station , under Section 9, ofthe Customs Act, 52 (52 of 1962), for setting up Private Bonded Warchouse .

का.आ. 931-भारत सरकार , वित्त मंत्रालय , राजस्व विभाग , नई दिल्ली, द्वारा दिनांक1-7-94 को जारी अधिसूचना संख्या -33/94 सी. शु. ( एन टी ) द्वारा मुझे प्रदत्त अधिकारों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैं, एतद्वारा तहसील तावरू, जिला मेवात ( हरियाणा ) में ज्ञावरू- रेवाड़ी रोड़ स्थित गांव निजामपुर को सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 52 ) की धारा 9 के अधीन निजी बाँडेड वेअरहाउस स्थापित करने के लिये वेअरहाउसिंग स्टेशन घोषित करती हूँ ।

[F. No. CCU (DZ) CUS/TECH/08 /2009] CHITRA GOURI LAL, Chief Commissioner [फा. सं. सी सी यू ( दि. क्षे ) सी.शु./तक/08/2009 ] चित्रा गौरी लाल, मुख्य आयुक्त

(1737)

1330 Gl/2009 1738

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/ CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] कार्यालय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त जोधपुर, 27 मार्च , 2009 सं. 1/2008/09

SCHOOL'S , SRIGANGANAGAR" for the purpose ofthe said section for the assessment year, 2005-06 onward, subject to the following conditions :-

1. the assessee will apply its income, or accumulate for application wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

का.आ. 932. आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43वां) की धारा 10 ( 23 ग ) के खण्ड ( vi ) के साथ पठित आयकर नियमावली-1962 के नियम 2 गए द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त , जोधपुर एतद्वारा एस. जी. एन . खालसा कॉलेज और स्कूल , श्रीगंगानगर को उक्त धारा के प्रयोजनार्थ निर्धारण वर्ष , 2005-06 तथा निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित करते हैं :

2. the assessee will not invest or deposit its funds (other than voluntary contribution received and maintained in the form ofjewellery , furniture etc.) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub- section (5) of Section 11 ;

1. कर निर्धारिती उसकी आय का प्रयोग अथवा उसकी आय का प्रयोग करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतः तथा अनन्यतः उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई ।

3. this order will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gain of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business;

4. the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the income-tax authority in accordance with the provisions of Income- tax Act, 1961 ;

2. कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उप- धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि (जेवर- जेवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेगा ।

5. that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organization with similar objectives and no part of the same will go to any of the members of the Institution .

6. This notification will remain in force until it is withdrawn .

3. यह आदेश किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगा, जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तकः ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हो ।

[Ref. No. CCIT/ITO (Tech . )/JU /2008-09/3880 ]

B. S. DHILLON, Chief Commissioner of Income Tax 4. कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा ।

रेल मंत्रालय (रेलवे बोर्ड)

नई दिल्ली, 6 अप्रैल , 2009

5. विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियां और परिसंपत्तियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएगी और उसका कोई भी भाग संस्थान के किसी सदस्य को नहीं दिया जाएगा ।

6. यह अधिसूचना तब तक जारी रहेगी जब तक इसे वापस न लिया जाय ।

का.आ. 933.- रेल मंत्रालय ( रेलवे बोर्ड ) , राजभाषा नियम, 1976 ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) के नियम 10 के उपनियम ( 2 ) और ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में दक्षिण- पश्चिम रेलवे के हुबली मंडल के वरिष्ठ मंडल चिकित्सा अधिकारी कार्यालय , वास्को- द - गामा को जहां 80 % से अधिक अधिकारियों/कर्मचारियों ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है ।

[संदर्भ सं.-मु.आ.आ./आ.अ. (तक )/जोध/2008-09/3880 ] . ढिल्लों , मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त

OFFICER OF THE CHEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

[सं. हिंदी-2009/रा.भा. 1/12/2 ] संसार चंद , निदेशक, ( राजभाषा ) Jodhpur, the 27th March , 2009

MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS

No. 2008/09

(Railway Board) New Delhi , the 6th April, 2009

S.O. 932. In exercise of the powers conferredby clause (vi) ofSection 10(23C) ofthe Income- tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) read with rule 2CA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, I, the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax , Jodhpur hereby approve " SGN KHALSA COLLEGE'S AND

S.O. 933. Ministry of Railways ( Railway Board), inpursuance of Sub Rule (2 ) and (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages ( use for official purposes ofthe union ) भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Rules , 1976, hereby, notify the office of Senior Divisional MedicalOfficer, Vasco- D-Gama ofHubli Division ofSouth- Western Railway, where 80 % or more Officers /Employees have acquired the working knowledge ofHindi .

[No.Hindi-2009/O.L. 1/12/2 ] SANSAR CHAND, Director (O. L. ) सूचना और प्रसारण मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 8 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 934.-केंद्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप -नियम (4) के अनुसरण में, दूरदर्शन महानिदेशालय ( सूचना और प्रसारण मंत्रालय ) के निम्नलिखित अधीनस्थ कार्यालयों , जिनके 80 % से अधिक कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, को एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है:-

1. दूरदर्शन अनुरक्षण केंद्र, मथुरा

2 दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर , मथुरा

3. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर, अलीगढ़

4. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर , कोसी कलां

5. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर , अलवर

6. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर , बसवा

7. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर , भरतपुर

8 दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर , डीग

9. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर , हिंडौनसिटि

10. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर , करौली

11. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर , किशनगढ़बास 12. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर, नगर

13. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर , फिरोजपुर झिरका 14. दूरदर्शन अनुरक्षण केंद्र , झांसी

15. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर , झांसी

16. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर, करवी

17. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर , ललितपुर

18. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर , मऊरानीपुर

19. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर , महरोनी

20. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर , महोबा

21. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर , ओरई

22. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर , राठ

23. दूरदर्शन अल्प शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर , तालबेहट

24. दूरदर्शन उच्च शक्ति ट्रांसमीटर , बांदा ।

[सं. ई-11017/6/2007- हिंदी ] प्रियम्वदा, निदेशक ( राजभाषा )

1739

MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING New Delhi , the 8th April, 2009

S.O. 934. In pursuance of Sub -Rule (4) ofRule 10 oftheOfficial Languages (use for Official Purposes ofthe Union) Rules , 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices under Directorate General of Doordarshan (Ministry of Information and Broadcasting), more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge ofHindi :-

1. Doordarshan Maintenance Center , Mathura 2. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter, Mathura 3. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter , Aligarh 4. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter , Kosi Kalan 5. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter, Alwar 6. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter, Baswa 7. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter , Bharatpur 8. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter, Deeg 9. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter , Hindounciti

10. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter , Karoli 11. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter , Kishangarhbas

12. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter , Nagar 13. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter , Firojpur Jhirka

14. Doordarshan Maintenance Center , Jhansi 15. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter , Jhansi 16. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter , Karvi 17. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter , Lalitpur 18. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter , Mauranipur 19. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter , Mahroni 20. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter , Mahoba 21. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter , Orai 22. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter , Rath 23. Doordarshan Low Power Transmitter , Talbehat 24. Doordarshan High Power Transmitter , Banda

[No. E- 11017/6/2007-Hindi ]

PRIYAMVADA, Director (O.L. ) 1740

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii ) ] संस्कृति मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली , 27 फरवरी , 2009

Central Government hereby makes the following nominations on the Governing Board of the Kalakshetra Foundation for a term of five years :-

Members Nominated Under Section 11 (b) का.आ. 935. कलाक्षेत्र प्रतिष्ठान अधिनियम , 1993 के खंड 11 द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का उपयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा कलाक्षेत्र प्रतिष्ठान के शासी बोर्ड में पाँच वर्ष की अवधि के लिए निम्नलिखित सदस्यों को नामित करती है :-

1. Dr. R.V. Vaidyanatha Ayyar , A -202 , Temple Tree Apartments , 29/1 , Jarganhalli , Kanakpura Road , Bangalore-560078

खण्ड 11 ( ख ) के तहत नामित सदस्य

2. Shri Abhijit Sengupta , C- 1 / 21 , Bapa Nagar , New Delhi

1. डॉ. आर.वी. वैद्यनाथ अय्यर , ए-202 , टेंपल ट्री अपार्टमेंट , 29/1, जरगनहल्ली कनकपुरा रोड, बेंगलुरू -560078

2. श्री अभिजीत सेनगुप्त , सी-1 / 21 , बापा नगर , नई दिल्ली

3. Dr. Preetha Reddy , Managing Director . Appollo Hospitals , No. 21 , Greams Road , Greams Lane , Thousand Lights , Chennai - 600006

3. डॉ. प्रीता रेड्डी , प्रबंध निदेशक , अपोलो हॉस्पीटल्स, नं. 21 , ग्रीम्सरोड, ग्रीम्स लेन , थाउजेन्ट्स, लाईट्स ,चेन्नई -600006

4. Ms. Arundhati Nag. Managing Trustee . " Ranga Shankara" 36 Pt-II , 8th Cross , J.P. Nagar , IInd Phase , Bangalore-650078

4. सुश्री अरुन्धती नाग , प्रबंध न्यासी , " रंग शंकर ", 36 भाग- II , 8 क्रॉस , जे.पी. नगर , दूसरा चरण , बेंगलुरू -650078

5. सुश्री माधवी मुद्गल , 164 , गोल्फ लिंक , नई दिल्ली -110004

5. Ms. Madhvi Mudgal , 164 , Golf Link , New Delhi-110004

6. श्री श्रीराम पंचू, नं. 16 , टेंपल ग्लेड , 64 , बीच रोड , कलाक्षेत्र कॉलोनी , चेन्नै-600090

6. Shri Sriram Panchu , No. 16, Temple Glade, 64, Beach Road, Kalakshetra Colony, Chennai - 600090 7. श्री पी.टी. कृष्णन , नं. 1 , सेकेंड स्ट्रीट , वालेस गार्डेन ,. चेन्नै-600006

7. Shri P.T. Krishnan , No. 1 Second Street, Wallace Gardens , Chennai -600006

8. श्री एन. मुरली , प्रबंध निदेशक , दी हिन्दू, कस्तूरी बिल्डिंग , नं. 859 , अन्ना सलाई , चेन्नै-600085

8. Shri N. Murali , Managing Director , The Hindu , Kasturi Buildings , No. 859 , Anna Salai , Chennai -600002

9. डॉ. ए. सी. मुथैया , " अडयार विला " , नं. 4 , गाँधी मंडपम रोड, कोट्टुरपुरम , चेन्नै -600085

खण्ड 11 ( घ ) के तहत नामित पदेन सदस्य

9. Dr. A.C. Muthiah , " Adayar Villa " , No. 4 , Gandhi Mandapam Road, Kotturpuram , Chennai - 600085

Ex-officioMembers nominated under Section 11 (d) 1. सचिव, संस्कृति मंत्रालय या उनके प्रतिनिधि , जो संस्कृति मंत्रालय , भारत सरकार , नई दिल्ली में कम से कम उप - सचिव स्तर के हों ।

1. Secretary, Ministry of Culture or his representative not below the rank of a Deputy Secretary in the Ministry of Culture , Government of India , New Delhi .

2. संस्कृति मंत्रालय के वित्तीय सलाहकार या उनके प्रतिनिधि, जो संस्कृति मंत्रालय , भारत सरकार , नई दिल्ली में कम से कम उप- सचिव स्तर के हों ।

सदस्य सचिव

निदेशक , कलाक्षेत्र प्रतिष्ठान , शासी बोर्ड के पदेन सदस्य सचिव होंगे ।

2. Financial Adviser of Ministry of Culture or his representative not below the rank of a Deputy Secretary in the Ministry of Culture, Government of India , NewDelhi .

[मि. सं. 11-14/2008-अकादमी ]

Member Secretary

वी. टी. जोसेफ , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF CULTURE

Director Kalakshetra Foundation will be the Ex-officio Member Secretary of the Governing Board.

New Delhi , the 27th February, 2009

[ F. No. 11-14/2008 -Akademies ] S.O. 935. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 11 of the Kalakshetra Foundation Act 1993 , the

V.T. JOSEPH , Under Secy.

1741 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 30 जून, 2008

का.आ. 936. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स कानूभाई एंड संस , पेट्रोल पंप के सामने , अमरेली रोड , सावरकुण्डला-364515 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " के एस-1000" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सियाराम " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/ 09/08 / 158 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

MAX:1900 kg 10 : 4 kg : 200g Class:

Slyaram

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

तुला के बायीं और दायीं तरफ के नीचे और ऊपर के कवर में किए गए छेदों के माध्यम से लीड तार को निकाल कर सीलिंग की गई है और इसके बाद तार पर वर्गाकार लीड सील फिक्स की गई है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने का एक प्रारूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1.× 10 के, 2 × 10 के, 5 × 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 82 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1742

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009 /CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II- SEC. 3( ii ) ] MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

New Delhi , the 30th June, 2008.

S.O. 936. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and ( 8) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type) with digital indication of medium accuracy (accuracy class- III ) of Series - KS - 1000 and with brand name " SIYARAM " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s Kanubhai & Sons , Opp . Petrol Pump, Amreli Road, Savarkundla - 364 515 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/ 158 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with digital indication of maximum capacity of 1000kg. and minimum capacity of4kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 200g .It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

MAX:1000 kg MN : 4kg : 200g Class

Figure2: Schematic diagram of sealing arrangement

The sealing is done by passing a leaded wire through the holes made in the bottom and top cover of the indicator at the left and right side , then a square lead seal is fixed on the wire . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

7 Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg. and upto 5000kg. and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5gr . or more and with ' e ' value 1 X 10 , 2X10k or 5x10%, kbeing the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[WM- 21 ( 82)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1743

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 जून , 2008

का.आ. 937.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाढ़ और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स कानूभाई एंड संस , पेट्रोल पंप के सामने , अमरेली रोड ,,सावरकुण्डला-364515 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " के एस टी-030 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सियाराम " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08 / 156 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

MAX : 30 kg MIN . 100 ge.2g Class : II

Slyaram

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

तुला के बायीं और दायीं तरफ के नीचे और ऊपर के कवर में किए गए छेदों के माध्यम से लीड तार को निकाल कर सीलिंग की गई है और इसके बाद तार पर वर्गाकार लीड सील फिक्स की गई है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने का एक प्रारूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी . होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 *, 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 82 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1744

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/ CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 30th June , 2008

S.O. 937. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

Figure 2 : Schematic diagram of sealing arrangement

Thesealing is done by passing a leaded wire through the holes made in the bottom and top cover ofthe balance at the left and right side, then a square lead seal is fixed on the wire . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument ofsimilar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k , 2x 10k , or 5x 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 82)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1745 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 30 जून , 2008

का.आ. 938.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स कानूभाई एंड संस , पेट्रोल पंप के सामने , अमरेली रोड , सावरकुण्डला -364515 गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " के एस टी-030 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सियाराम " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल.कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08/157 समनुदेशित किंया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 बोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

MAX 30 kg MIN : 100 ge: 5g Class : Ili

Siyaram

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

तुला के बायीं और दायीं तरफ के नीचे और ऊपर के कवर में किए गए छेदों के माध्यम से लीड तार को निकाल कर सीलिंग की गई है और इसके बाद तार पर वर्गाकार लीड सील फिक्स की गई है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने का एक प्रारूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक कीअधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10,5 × 10 *, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 82 )/2008 ] आर माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1330 G1/09-2 1746

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18, 2009/CHAITRA28 , 1931

[PART II SEC.3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 30th June, 2008

S.O. 938.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights, and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Figure 2 : Schematic diagram of sealing arrangement

The sealing is done by passing a leaded wire through the holes made in the bottom and top cover of the balance at the left and right side , then a square lead seal is fixed on the wire . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k, or 5x 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (82)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1747

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर, 2008

का.आ. 939.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इंटर नेशनल रोड डायनामिक्स , 702 , 43 वां स्ट्रीट ईस्ट, एस 7 के 3 टी 9 साक्साटून , सास्क्रेचवान , कनाडा द्वारा विनिर्मित साधारण यथार्थता (यथार्थता वर्ग IV ) के ' एस ए डब्ल्यू- 15- सी-2 ' श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित , अंकक सूचन सहित तोलन उपकरण ( स्टेटिक व्हील लोड वेयर ) जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " एस ए डब्ल्यू" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) , और जिसे इंटर नेशनल रोड डायनामिक्स साउथ एशिया प्रा.लि. विला 13 , ग्राउंड फ्लोर , ब्लाक -5 , चार्मवुड विलेज , सूरजकुंड रोड , फरीदाबाद -121009 हरियाणा द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/07/ 272 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उपरोक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( स्टेटिक व्हील लोड व्हीयर ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 15 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 500 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 50 कि. ग्रा. है । भार तोलन का पैड एक उच्च सामर्थ्य इस्पात प्लेट का बना है तथा तल साइड पर दो स्लाट मशीन द्वारा निर्मित हैं । इन स्लाट में विकृत गेज संस्थापित किए गए हैं । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 7.2 वी डीसी से 9 वी डीसी प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति--2 सीलिंग प्रावधान

उपकरण को सील करने के लिए इसमें दो सील की जाएंगी । पहली इलैक्ट्रानिक सर्किट की सुरक्षा के लिए तोलन उपकरण डिस्पले के बायीं ओर तथा दूसरी सील यांत्रिक एसेंबली की सुरक्षा के लिए डिस्प्ले इकाई के दायीं ओर नीचे होगी । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (49 )/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1748

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

NewDelhi, the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 939.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (See the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Static Wheel Load Weigher ) with digital indication of ordinary accuracy ( Accuracy class- IV) of Series -SAW- 15C- II " and with brand name " SAW " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M/s. International Road Dynamics , 702, 43rd Street East, S7K3T9 Saskatoon , Saskatchewan , Canada and Marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale byM/ s . International Road Dynamics South Asia Pvt . Ltd. , Villa 13 , Ground Floor, Block -V , Charmwood Village, Surajkund Road , Faridabad- 121 009 , Haryana and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/272;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Static Wheel Load Weigher) with a maximum capacity of 15 tonne and minimum capacity of500kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 50kg . The weigh pad is made of a high strength steel plate and two slots are milled on the bottom side . The strain gauges are installed in these slots . The Liquid Crystal Diode (LCD ) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 7.2V DC to 9V DC power supply.

Figure-2: Sealing arrangement

The sealing the instrument two seals are applied, one is at the left side of the display of the weighing instrument for safety of electronic circuit and the other seal is at the right side below of the display unit for safety of mechancial assembly . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and upto 100 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 1,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x 10k, or 5x 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (49)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1749 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 940.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स बी-टैक इलैक्ट्रोनिक, 36 , अंकुर इंडि, एस्टेट , आर.एस. नं. 275/1 एंड 276, शापार-360030 , तालुका- कोटदा सांगानी , जिला- राजकोट द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " बीटी- पी- III " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के माडल का , जिसकें ब्राण्ड का नाम " जीनियस डीजी स्केल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) , और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08/497 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त माडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण के दोनों ओर तल प्लेट , शीर्ष कवर और स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के छेदों के जरिये गुथित सील तार को डाला जायेगा और उसके बाद सीसा सील लगाई जाएगी । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . से अधिक और 5,000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10,5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 180 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1750

[PART II- SEC . 3( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18, 2009/ CHAITRA 28 , 1931

New Delhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 940. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication ofmedium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of Series- "BT -P- III " and with brand name "GENIUS DIGI SCALE " (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s B -Tech Electronic, 36, Ankur Ind. Esate , R.S. No. 275/1 , & 276 , Shapar- 360030 , Taluka-Kotda Sangani , District-Rajkot and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/497 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure-2: Sealing provision of the indicator of model

Twisted seal wire passes through the holes of bottom plate, top cover and stamping plate on both of the sides of the indicator of the instrument and then a lead seal is applied. The instrument cannot be opened without tampering the seal . Atypical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 5,000kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10k, or 5x 10 %, wherek is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (180)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1751 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 941.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि .उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (माडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स बी-टैक इलैक्ट्रोनिक , 36 , अंकुर इंडि. एस्टेट , आर.एस. नं. 275/1 एंड 276 , शापार-360030 , तालुका- कोटदा सांगानी , जिला- राजकोट द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " बोटीं- टी- II " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " जीनियस डीजी स्केल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) , और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08/495 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त माडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) । ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है । जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

Genius Digiscale

Genius Digiscale B- Tech Electronic ShaparDist-Rajkot

माडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण के दोनों ओर तल प्लेट , शीर्ष कवर और स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के छेदों के जरिये गुंथित सील तार को डाला जायेगा और उसके बाद सीसा सील लगाई जाएगी । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित माडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2 × 10 के, 5 × 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 180 )/2008 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1752

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009 /CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii)]

NewDelhi , the 30th December, 2008

S.O. 941. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections ( 7) and (8 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II) of Series- " BT- T- II " and with brand name "GENIUS DIGI SCALE" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s B- Tech Electronic , 36, Ankur Ind. Esate, R.S. No. 275/1 , & 276 , Shapar - 360030, Taluka- Kotda Sangani , District-Rajkot and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/495;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 20kg and minimum capacity of 50g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 1g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare efect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Tach Electronic Dist -Rajket

Figure-2: Schematic diagram of the model

Twisted seal wire passes through the holes of bottom plate, top cover and stamping plate on both of the sides of the instrument and then a lead seal is applied . The instrument cannot be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of100 to50,000 for ' e' value of Img to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k , or 5 × 10%, wherek is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured bythe same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 180)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director ofLegal Metrology 1753 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 942.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स बी-टैक इलैक्ट्रोनिक , 36 , अंकुर इंडि. एस्टेट, आर. एस. नं. 275/1 एंड 276, शापार-360030 , तालुका-कोटदा सांगानी , जिला- राजकोट द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " बीटी- पी- III " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के माडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " जीनियस डीजी स्केल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) , और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 08 /496 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है । जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

GeniusDigiecale

ShaparDist-Rajkot

GeniusDigiscale

B-TechElectronic

30K1309

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण के दोनों ओर तल प्लेट , शीर्ष कवर और स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के छेदों के जरिये गूंथित सील तार को डाला जायेगा और उसके बाद सीसा सील लगाई जाएगी । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मानं के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 180 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1330 G1/09-3 1754

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 30th December, 2008

S.O. 942. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferredby sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of " BT- T- III " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " GENIUS DIGI SCALE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . MB- Tech. Electronic, 36, Ankur Ind. Esate, R.S. No. 275/1 , & 276, Shapar - 360030 , Taluka - Kotda Sangani , District-Rajkot and which isassigned the approval mark IND/09/08/496 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minium capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare efect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing results. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Genisa

GeniusDigiscale

B-TechElectronic ShaparDist-Rajkot

Figure-2: Sealing diagram of the Model

Twisted seal wire passes through the holes of bottom plate, top cover and stamping plate on both of the sides of the instrument and then a lead seal is applied. The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate ofapproval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg. with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of100 to10,000 for ' e' value of 100mg . to 2g . and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2x 10k, or 5x 10% , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero . manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 180)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1755 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्रं 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर, 2008

का.आ. 943.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मारेल फूड सिस्टम्स , आस्टर्हराउन 9 , आईएस-210 , गारडाबेर , आइसलैंड द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एम 1100 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप - डाउल रेंज ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " मारेल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) , और जिसे मैसर्स डेनटैक फूड सिस्टम्स प्रा. लि. , केवी 35 , पनमपल्ली नगर, कोचिन-682036 द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08/462 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप - डाउन रेंज ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 6 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 3 कि. ग्रा. तक । ग्रा. और 3 कि.ग्रा. से ऊपर 6 कि.ग्रा. तक 2 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है । जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

1.20.34

MAREL

11003133.3.08

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

इंडीकेटर के दायीं ओर आउटर और इनर कवर को काट कर बनाए गए दो छेदों में लीड वायर बाँध कर स्टाम्प और सील का सत्यापन किया जाता है । सील तोड़े बिना उपकरण को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 162 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1756

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28, 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

New Delhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 943. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Tabletop type - dual range) with digital indication of " M 1100 " series ofmedium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " MAREL" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M/s . Marel Food Systems, Austurhraun 9 , IS-210 , Gardabaer , Iceland and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/ s . Dantech Food Systems Pvt . Ltd. , KV 35, Panampilly Nagar , Cochin - 682036 and which is assigned the approval Mark IND /09/08/462;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Tabletop type -dual range) with a maximum capacity of 6kg . and minium capacity of20g. The verification scale interval (e ) is 1g upto 3kg. and 2g. above 3 kg. and upto 6kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare efect . The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

20.0

204

MAREL

Figure-2: Sealing diagram of theModel

For sealing , on the right side of the indicator two holes are made by cutting the outer and inner cover which are fastened by a leaded wire for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg. to 2g . and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x 10k, or 5x 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 162)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director ofLegal Metrology 1757 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 944.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मारेल फूड सिस्टम्स , आस्टर्हराउन 9 , आईएस -210 , गारडाबेर, आइसलैंड द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एम 2200 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप- डाउल रेंज ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " मारेल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) , और जिसे मैसर्स डेनटैक फूड सिस्टम्स प्रा. लि. , केवी 35 , पनमपल्ली नगर , कोचिन -682036 द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08/461 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप - डाउल रेंज ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 15 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 6 कि. ग्रा. तक 2 ग्रा. और 6 कि.ग्रा. से ऊपर 15 कि.ग्रा. तक 5 ग्राम है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है । जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टिल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के" ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 162 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1758

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii )] New Delhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 944. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights andMeasures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type -dual range) with digital indication of "M2200" series of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " MAREL" (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufacturedby M/s . Marel Food Systems , Austurhraun 9 , IS-210 , Gardabaer , Iceland and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/s . Dantech Food Systems Pvt. Ltd. , KV 35 , Panampilly Nagar, Cochin - 682036 and which is assigned the approval Mark IND/09/08 /461 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Tabletop type - dual range ) with a maximum capacity of 15kg and minimum capacity of 40g . The verification scale interval (e) is 2g upto 6kg and 5g above 6 kg and upto 15kg . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare efect . The Liquid Crystal Diode (LCD) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

ΜΑΣ Η ΝΕ.13 ΚΟ

2.28.38

Figure-2: Sealing diagram of the model

For sealing, on the right side of the indicator two holes are made by cutting the outer and inner cover which are fastened by a leaded wire for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2x 10k , or 5x 10% , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM -21 ( 162 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1759

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 945.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स व्हे स्टार, 10/359/1 , सर्वोदय नगर , इचालकरंजी -416115 , जिला- कोल्हापुर , महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 111 ) वाले "डब्ल्यूएस- पीएफ " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " व्हे स्टार " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08/502 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा . है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 250 वोल्टेज , 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण इंडिकेटर को सीलबंद करने के लिए स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के पास दो छेद किए जायेंगे जिन्हें सीसा और सीसा तार द्वारा सीलबंद किया जाएगा । सूचक की सील को तोड़े बिना खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापभान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 , 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 178 )/2008]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1760

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18, 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the30th December, 2008

S.O. 945. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) of Series " WS - PF " and with brand name " WEIGH- STAR " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Weigh-Star , 10/359/1 , Sarvoday Nagar, Ichalkaranji -416115 , Distt . Kolhapur , M.S. and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08 / 502;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg and minimum capacity of 4kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 200g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure-2: Sealing provision of the indicator of model

For sealing two holes are made near the stamping plate on the indicator of the instrument which are sealed by lead and seal wire . The instrument can not be opened without beaking the seal .A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000 kg.with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 *, where kisa positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 178 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1761

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 946.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स व्हे स्टार , 10/359/1 , सर्वोदय नगर , इचालकरंजी -416115 , जिला-कोल्हापुर , महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " डब्ल्यूएस-टीटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " व्हे स्टार " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09 /08 / 501 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जां 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 *, 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 178 )/2008 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1330 G1/09-4 [PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1762

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18, 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

New Delhi, the 30th December, 2008

S.O. 946. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said repert (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with digital indication of "WS- TT" series of medium accuracy (accuracy class- III ) and with brand name " WEIGH- STAR " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Weigh- Star , 10/359/1 , Sarvpday Nagar , Ichalkaranji -416115 , Distt . Kolhapur, M.S. and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/501;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Tabletop type ) with amaximum capacity of 30kg. and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5g . It has atare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-2: Sealing diagram of the model

For sealing two holes are made near the stamping plate on the instrument which are sealed by lead and seal wire . The instrument can not be opened without breaking the seal. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model isgiven above.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for e value of 100mg . to 2g. and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k, where kis a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 178 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology ::

1763 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर, 2008

का.आ. 947.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहितं प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का.60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स रॉयल इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स एंड इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स , रामपुरा बाजार , कोटी 324006 राजस्थान द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) के " आर टी डब्ल्यूबी-30टी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " रायल टच " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/ 08 /308. समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( वेब्रिज प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

'ROYAL TOUCH ' Max. 30 Tonne . e.5kg Min. 190Kg AC - II

मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

इंडीकेटर में छेदों के माध्यम से सीलिंग की जाती है , तब इन छेदों में तार को निकालकर , तार पर लीड सील लगाई जाती है । सील को तोड़े बिना इंडीकेटर को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का स्कीमवार डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री, से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 , 5× 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (232) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1764

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 18, 2009/CHAITRA 28, 1931

New Delhi , the 30th December, 2008

S.O. 947. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge Type ) with digital indication ofmedium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of Series " RTWB - 30T" and with brand name " ROYAL TOUCH " (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s . Royal Electronics & Instruments, Rampura Bazar , Kota - 324006 , Rajasthan and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /08/308 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge Type ) with a maximum capacity of30tonne and minimum capacity of 100kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 5kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

AC-I

Max.30Tonne.

'ROYALTOUCH' e.5kg Min.100Kg

Figure 2 Sealing arrangement

Sealing is done through the holes made in the indicator , then a wire is passed through these holes and the lead seal is applied on the wire. The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 12) ofSection 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 100 tonne with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where kis a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (232 )/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1765 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 948.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स रुद्राक्ष टेकनोलोजी, मंजरी रोड, पुणे , महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग ( 11 ) वाले " एन बी डब्ल्यूएस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( बेबी वेइंग स्केल ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " नक्षत्र " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात्उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/07/474 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है । उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( बेबी वेइंग स्केल ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 10 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्टेज और , 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद किया जाएगा और मॉडल को उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , कार्य सिद्धांत की शर्तों को बदला नही जाएगा । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्तदिया गया है । सीलिंग प्रावधान स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के पास इंडिकेटर के पीछे दायीं तरफ है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन भापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और "ई" मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णाक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (191 ) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1766

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART 11 SEC. 3(ii) ]

New Delhi , the 30th December,2008

S.O. 948. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( ase the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Babby Weighing Scale) with amaximum capacity of 10kg and minimum capacity of40g. The verification scale interval (e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Figure-2 Schametic arrangement ofsealing arrangement near left side ofthe machine

The sealing has been done at the left side of the indicator near stamping plate by lead and wire to prevent the opening ofthe machine for fraudulent practices . A typical schematic diagram of sealing arrangement of the model has been given above which is at the left side of the machine .

Further , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg to 2g and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of5g or more and with ' e' value of 1x 10k, 2x10 or 5 × 10%, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 191 )/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director ofLegal Metrology 1767 [ भाग 1 ]- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 949.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स रुद्राक्ष टेकनोलोजी, मंजारी रोड , पुणे महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एन के डब्ल्यू एस "श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( किचन स्केल ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " नक्षत्र " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/07/473 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है । उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( किचन स्केल ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपद‌र्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद किया जाएगा और मॉडल को उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , कार्य सिद्धांत की शर्तों को बदला नहीं जाएगा । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है । जो कि इंडिकेटर के तल में है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 *, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 191 ) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथेम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1768

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA APRIL 18,2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi, the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 949. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell-based non-automatic weighing instrument ( Kitchen Scale ) with a maximum capacity of 5kg and minimum capacity of 20g . The verification scale interval (e) is 1g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Figure-2 Schametic arrangement of seating arrangement near lokside of the machine

The sealing has been done at the left side of the indicator near stamping plate by load and wire to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices . A typical schematic diagram of sealing arrangement of the model has been given above which is at the bottom of the machine .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferredby sub-section ( 12 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , aocuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 2g and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of500 to 10.000 for ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (191 )/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1769 [भाग -खाण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 950.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माष मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेमा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स रुद्राक्ष टेकनोलोजी, मंजारी रोड, पुणे , महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एन एच डब्ल्यू एस" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( हैंगिंग स्केल ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " नक्षत्र " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्तः मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/07/472 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है । उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( हैंगिंग टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 120 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता । कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई) 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

Nakshatra

चित्र-2: मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद किया जाएगा और मॉडल को उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता, डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम, कार्य सिद्धांत की शर्तों को बदला नही जाएगा । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्तदिया गया है जो कि इंडीकेटर के शीर्ष पर है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2× 10 के, 5× 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 191 ) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1330Gl/09-5 1770

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] New Delhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 950.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained usę and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub -sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the CentralGovernment hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non -automatic weighing instrument (Hanging type) with digital indication of "NHWS" series ofmedium accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " Nakshatra " (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Rudraksha Technologies , Manjari Road , Pune, Maharashtra andwhich is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/472;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Hanging type ) with a maximum capacity of 120 kg and minimum capacity of 1kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 50g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure -2. Schametic arrangement of sealing at the rear side of the machine

The sealing has been done at the rear side near stamping plate by lead and wire to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices . A typical schematic diagram of sealing arrangement of the model has been given above which is at the rear side of the machine .

Further, in exercise of the power conferredby sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2x10 or 5 × 10 *, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 191 )/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director ofLegal Metrology 1771

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 951.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बांट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स रुद्राक्ष टेकनोलोजी, मंजारी रोड, पुणे महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एन पी डब्ल्यू एस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " नक्षत्र " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/07/471 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है..। उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि.ग्रा . है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 4.8 डी सी वी प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद किया जाएगा और माडल को उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम , कार्य सिद्धांत की शर्तों को बदला नहीं जाएगा । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्तदिया गया है जो कि इंडीकेटर के तल में है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 100 कि.ग्रा. से और 200 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के , 2 × 10 *, 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 191 )/2007 ] आर. माधुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1772

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18, 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SBC.3 (ii) ]

New Delhi, the 30th December, 2008

S.O. 951.-Whereas the Central Goverment, after considering the report semitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model denaribed in the said repart (ase the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards ofWeights and basses Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards ofWeights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules, 1967 and the saidmodel is illy to maintain its accuracy over periods ofsustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -esstions (7) and (8) of sestion 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the antifiente ofapproval of non- automatic weighing instrument (Person Weighing Machine ) with digital indication of " WWE" series ofmedium acuracy ( accuracy olase- HI ) and with brand name "Nakabantza" (herein roformed to as tho said model ), manufactwed by M/s. Rudmkaha Tochnologies, Manjari Road , Pune, Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mask IND/00/07 / 471;

The said model is a stain gauge type load ceil based non-automatic weighing instrument (Person Weighing Machine) with maximum capacity of 150kg and minimum capacity of 2kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 100g . The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing ramalt. The instruments eperates on battery 4.8DC V power supply.

Figure-2 Schematic arrangement of scaling arrangement at the bottom of the machine.

The sealing has been done at the bottom side near stamping plate by lead and wite to prevent the opening of the machine for fraudulent practices . A typical schematic diagram of the sealing arrangement of the model has been given above which is at the bottom of the machine.

Further, in exercise of the powers conformed by sub-section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Centr.. Govomment hensby declares that this certifiestom approval of the mid model skall also cover the weighing instruments of similar.make, encuracy and perfomance of same series with maximuon capacity in the range of 100kg . to 200kg. with sonification andle inte ( ) inthongs.of.100 to 36,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1× 10%, 2 × 10 or 5×10%, where is a positivo orangative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same prinsiple , alasign and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (191)/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director ofLegal Metrology 1773

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 952. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( मीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माम मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एलकॉन डिजिटल सिस्टम्स, बी. नं. 31/370 , बी. वेलकेयर हास्पिटल के सामने, वितिला , कोच्चि 19 , केरल द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " ए जी डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एलकॉन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08/166 सममुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है ( इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 ग्रां. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 10 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलमात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

FECON

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

फ्रंट टॉप कवर और तल प्लेट को काट कर तुला के दायीं ओर पीछे की तरफ दो छेद करके इनमें से लीडिड वायर बाँध कर उस पर स्टाम्प और सील का सत्यापन किया जाता है । सील को तोड़े बिना उपकरण को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा.उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10*, 2 × 10 , 5 × 10%, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (76 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1774

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/ CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 952. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top Type ) with digital indication of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) of series "AGW " and with brand name " ELCON" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufacturedby M/s . Elcon Digital Systems, # B. No. 31/370, B. Opp. Welcare, Hospital , Vyttila, Kochi - 19 , Kerala and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/ 166 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 300g. and minimum capacity of 200mg . The verification scale interval (e) is 10mg . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 V , 50Hz alternative current power supply

ELCON

Figure-2 Schematic diagram of the model

On the rear right side of the balance 2 holes are made by cutting the front top cover and bottom plate which is fastened by a leaded wire for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg. with verificaiton scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 1 mg . to 50 mg. and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of5000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100 mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (76)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1775 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 953.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एलकॉन डिजिटल सिस्टम्स, बी. नं. 31/370 , बी. वेलकेयर हास्पिटल के सामने , वितिला , कोच्चि19 , केरल द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " ए एच डब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( हैंगिंग टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एलकॉन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08/ 165 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( हैंगिंग टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10* , 2 × 10 %, 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 76 ) /2008 ]

आर. माधुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1776

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/ CHAITRA 28, 1931

[PART II SEC. 3( ii) ] New Delhi , the 30th December,2008

S.O. 953. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Messures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods ofsustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing instrument (Hanging Type ) with digital indication of medium securacy (Accuracy class- III ) of series " AHW" and with brand name "ELCON" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model), manufactured by M/s . Elcon Digital Systems , # B. No. 31/370, B. Opp . Weleare, Hospital , Vyttila, Kochi - 19, Kerala and which is assigned the approval mark: IND/09/08/165;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Hanging type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg. andminimum capacity of 100 kg. The verification scale interval (e) is5g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results. The instrument operates on 230 Vots, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply

The Trust boy

Figure-2 Sealing provision of the indicator of model

On the rear right side of the balance 2 holes are made by cutting the front top cover and bottom plate which is fastened by a leaded wire for receiving the verification stamp and seal. The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verificaiton scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of5g. or more and with 'e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10%, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (76)/2008]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1777 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 954.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल बधार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा (8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ए एंड डी कंपनी लिमिटेड , 3-23-14 हिषासी-इकेबुकुरो , तोशिमा-कु, टोक्यो-1700013 , जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) बाले " जी.आर. " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एण्ड" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स जय इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स एंड सिस्टम्स प्रा.लि. , ई-16 , एवरेस्ट बिल्डिंग , तारदेव रोड , मुंबई -400034 , महाराष्ट्र द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08 /221 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो- मेगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पनसेशन प्रिंसीपल का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 120 ग्रा. अधि. ≤ 300 ग्रा. और सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल एन. ≤ 300000 के लिए ई . 21 ग्रा. तथा मापमान अंतराल ई = डी या ई-10 डी या ई 100 डी है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है। लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण को इसके ढांचे में छेद करके इनमें सील वायर डालते हुए सील बन्द किया जाएगा। मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 194)/2007 ]

आर. माधुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1330G1/09-6 1778

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 18, 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

New Delhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 954. Whereas the Central Government; after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy class- I) of series "GR" and with brand name "AND" (hereinafter referred to as the said model), manufactured by M/s . A & D CompanyLimited, 3-23-14 Highasi- Ikebukuro, Toshima-ku, Tokyo- 170 0013 , Japan and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale byM/s .Jay Instruments & Systems Pvt. Ltd. , E- 16, Everest Building, Tardeo Road, Mumbai -400 034, Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/221 ;

The said model is an Electro Magnetic Force Compensation Principle based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 120g Max ≤ 300g in respect of verification scale interval n ≤ 300000 for e ≥1g and scale intervaled or e 10 dore 100 d. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Liquid Crystal Diode (LCD) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done by drilling holes in the body of the instrument and passing a seal wire through the holes . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

[F. No. WM- 21 (194)/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1779

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 955.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा (8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ए एंड डी कंपनी लिमिटेड, 3-23-14 हिघासी- इकेबुकुरो , तोशिमा- कु, टोक्यो-170 0013 , जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग I ) वाले ' जी.एफ. " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एण्ड" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स जय इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स एंड सिस्टम्स प्रा.लि. , ई-16 , एवरेस्ट बिल्डिंग , तारदेव रोड , मुंबई -400034 , महाराष्ट्र द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08/ 225 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो- मेगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पनसेशन प्रिंसीपल का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 210 ग्रा. अधि. 8100 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 ई है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल 0.01 ग्रा. ई ≤ और डी वेल्यूई 10 है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । 2000

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण को इसके ढांचे में छेद करके इनमें सील वायर डालते हुए सील बन्द किया जाएगा माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 194 ) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1780

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART I SEC . 3( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 30th December, 2008

S.O. 955. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said repost ( see the figure given below) is in conformitywith the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Messures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards ofWeights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub -sections (7 ) and (8 ) ofSection 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certifionte of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy class - 1) of series "GF" and with brand name "AND" (hereinafter referred to as the said nedol ) , manufacturedby M/s . A & D Company Limited, 3-23-14 Highasi- Ikebukuro, Toshima-ku, Tokyo- 1700013 , Japan and masketed in India without any alteration before or after sale byM/s Jay Instruments & Systems Pvt. Ltd., E- 16, Everest Building, Tardeo Road, Mumbai -400 034, Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/225;

The saidmodel is anElectro Magnetic Force Compensation Principle based non- automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity 210g≤ Max ≤ 8100g and minimum capacity 20e. The verification scale interval 0.01g≤ e≤ 1g and' d' value is o/10 . It has a tare device witle a 100 por cant subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode (LCD) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply.

Figure-2 Babematindingum ofsealing prevision ofthe model

Sealing is done by drilling beles in the body of the instrument and passing a seal wire through the holes. A typical scheumatic dingrams of sealing provision ofthe model is given above.

[F. No. WM-21 (194)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director ofLegal Metrology 1781 [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 956. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अत , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ए एंड डी कंपनी लिमिटेड , 3-23-14 हिघासी-इकेबुकुरो , तोशिमा- कु, टोक्यो-170 0013 , जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले ' जी.एच. " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एण्ड" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स जय इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स एंड सिस्टम्स प्रा.लि. , ई-16 , एवरेस्ट बिल्डिंग , तारदेव रोड , मुंबई-400034 , महाराष्ट्र द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08/222 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो- मेगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पनेसेशन प्रिंसीपल का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. अधि. ≤ 320 ग्रा. और सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल एन ≤ 320000 के लिए ई 1 ग्रा. तथा मापमान अंतराल डी = 1 / 10 ई या डी = 1/100 ई है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है। लिक्विडक्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण को इसके ढांचे में छेद करके इनमें सील वायर डालते हुए सील बन्द किया जाएगा । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 194 )/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1782

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28, 1931

[PART I-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

NewDelhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 956. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the saiti report (see the figure given below) iş in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- sections ( 7) and (8) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument(Table top type ) with digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy class- 1) ofseries "GH " and with brand name "AND" (hereinafter referred to as the said modol ), manufacturedby M/s . A & D Company Limited, 3-23-14 Highasi- Ikebukuro , Toshima-ku, Tokyo- 170 0013 , Japan and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/s. Jay Instruments & Systems Pvt. Ltd. , E- 16, Everest Building, Tardeo Road, Mumbai-400 034 , Maharashtra and which isassigned the approval mark IND/09/08/222;

The said model is an Electro Magnetic Force Compensaiton Principle based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity 50g. Max 320g. in respect of verification scale interval n≤ 320000 for E ≤ 1 g . and scale interval d = eord = 1 / 10 eord = 1/100 e. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode(LCD) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V , 50Hz alternative current power supply.

Figure-2 Schametic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done by drilling holes in the body of the instrument and passing a seal wire through the holes . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 194)/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1783 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर, 2008

का.आ. 957. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त' रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ए एंड डी कम्पनी लिमिटेड, 3-23-14 हिघासी- इकेबुकुरो , तोशिमा-कु , टोक्यो-1700013 , जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " ईके" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एण्ड" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स जय इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स एंड सिस्टम्स प्रा. लि. , ई-16 , एवरेस्ट बिल्डिंग , तारदेव रोड , मुंबई-400034 , महाराष्ट्र द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/ 09/08/224 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो मैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पेनसेशन प्रिंसीपल पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई) 10 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टिल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण को इसके ढांचे में छेद करके इनमें सील वायर डालते हुए सील बन्द किया आएगा । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अतंराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10के , 2× 10के , 5× 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 194)/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान , 1784

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009 /CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] New Delhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 957.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards ofWeights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Goveriment hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication ofhigh accuracy ( Accuracyclass- II) ofSeries "EK " and with brand name "AND" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufinstured by M/ s . A & D Company Limited, 3-23-14 Highasi- Ikebukuro, Toshima-ku, Tokyo- 1700013, Japan and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/s . Jay Instruments & Systems Pvt. Ltd. , E- 16, Everont Building, Tardeo Road, Mumbai-400034 , Maharashtra and which is assigned theapproval mark IND/09/08/224;

The said model is an Electro Magnetic Force Compensation Principle based non- automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of300g. andminimum capacity of200mg. The verification scale interval ' e ' is 10mg . It has a tare devicewith a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Figure-2 Schermatic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model

Sealing is doneby drilling holes in the body ofthe instrument and passing a seal wire through the holes . Atypical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate ofapproval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance ofsame series with maximum capacity up to 50kg. with verification scale interval (n) inthe range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e' value of ling. to 50mg, andwith verification scale interval (n) in the range of5000 to50,000 for ' e' value of 100mg. or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10% , 2x10 or 5 × 10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the sarne manufacturer in aceerdance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Modél has been manufactured.

[F. No.WM-21 (194)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director ofLegal Metrology 1785 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर, 2008

का.आ. 958.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( माडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि, में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ए एंड डी कम्पनी लिमिटेड , 3-23-14 हिघासी- इकेबुकुरो , तोशिमा- कु , टोक्यो-170 0013 , जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले " एच आर " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के माडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एण्ड" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स जय इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स एंड सिस्टम्स प्रा. लि. , ई -16 , एवरेस्टबिल्डिंग , तारदेव रोड, मुंबई -400034 , महाराष्ट्र द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08 /223 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त माडल एक इलैक्ट्रो- मेगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पेनसेशन प्रिंसीपल का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता ≤ 210 ग्रा. और सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल एन ≤ 210000 के लिए ई ≥1 ग्रा. तथा मापमान अंतराल डी ई या ई = 10 डी है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टिल डायोड ( एल सीं डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

माडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण को इसके ढांचे में छेद करके इनमें सील वायर डालते हुए सील बन्द किया जाएगा । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (194 )/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिकं माप विज्ञान 1330G1 /09-7 1786

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009 /CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

New Delhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 958. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights andMeasures (ApprovalofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy class - I ) of Series " HR " and with brand name "AND" (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufacturedby M/s . A & D Company Limited, 3-23-14 Highasi- Ikebukuro, Toshima- ku , Tokyo- 1700013 , Japan and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/s . Jay Instruments & Systems Pvt . Ltd. , E- 16, Everest Building, Tardeo Road, Mumbai -400 034, Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/223 ;

The said model is an Electro Magnetic Force Compensation Principle based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of Max ≤210g in respect ofverification scale interval n ≤210000 for e≥ 1g and scale interval e=d or e= 10d. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode (LCD) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply.

Figure2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is doneby drilling holes in the body of the instrument and passing a seal wire through the holes. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

[F.No. WM -21 (194)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director ofLegal Metrology 1787 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 959.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त ' रिपोर्ट में वर्णित माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स संदीप स्केल , 302 , ज्ञान अमृत बिल्डिंग , ईरानी वाड़ी, मधुरदास क्रॉस रोड, कांडीवाली ( पश्चिम ) मुंबई द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " एस यू एम -3 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " SUNTRONICS " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/07/498 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो मैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पेनसेशन प्रिंसीपल पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 0.2 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 0.01 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

0.000

SUNTRONICS

9927

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्केल के तल प्लेट और शीर्ष कवर में किए गए छेद के माध्यम से सील किया जाता है तथा इन छेदों में सील करने की तार डाल कर उस पर सीसा सील लगाई जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमाडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 1,00,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के , 2× 10 के, 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 264)/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1788

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ]

NewDelhi , the 30th December, 2008

S.O. 959. Whereas the Central Goverment, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976( 60 of 1976) and the Standards ofWeights and Measures (ApprovalofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication ofhigh accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) of Series " SUM- 3 " and with brand name " SUNTRONICS" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Sundeep Scale, 302, Gyan Amrit Building, Irani Wadi , Madhurdas Cross Rond, Kandiwali (W) , Mumbai , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/498;

The said model is an Electro Magnetic Force Compensation Principle based non- automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of300g and minimum capacity of0.2g. The velfication scale interval ' e' is 0.01g. It has atare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

9927

Figure 2 Schematic diagram of the model

The sealing is done through the holes made in the bottom plate and top cover of the scale and sealing wire is passed through these holes and the lead seal is fixed on the wire . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 12) ofsection 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby dooleres that this certificate ofapproval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, azuucy and performance of series withmanirruan capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of100 te 50,000 for ' e ' value of langte 50mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 1,00,000 for ' e' value of 100mg or moreand with 'e' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (264)/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1789

भारत काराजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 960.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित माडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स संदीप स्केल , 302 , ज्ञान अमृत बिल्डिंग , ईरानी वाडी, मधुरदास क्रॉस रोड, कांडीवाली ( पश्चिम ) मुंबई द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " एस यू टी-12 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " SUNTRONICS " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/07 /499 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

8523

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्केल के तल प्लेट और शीर्ष कवर में किए गए छेद के माध्यम से सील किया जाता है तथा इन छेदों में सील करने की तार डाल कर उस पर सीसा सील लगाई जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1× 10*, 2× 10*, 5× 10% , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (264 ) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1790

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 18, 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 960. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument(Table top type) with digital indication ofhigh accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) of Series " SUT- 12 " and with brand name "SUNTRONICS" (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufacturedby M/ s . Sundeep Scale , 302 , Gyan Amrit Building, Irani Wadi, Madhurdas Cross Road, Kandiwali ( W) , Mumbai , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/499;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 30kg . and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ' e ' is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

8523 Figure and Figure 2 Schematic diagram of the model

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval (n ) inthe range of 100to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img. to 50mg . and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for' e' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (264)/2007)

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1791 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 961.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा (8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स संदीप स्केल , 302 , ज्ञान अमृत बिल्डिंग , ईरानी वाडी , मधुरदास क्रॉस रोड, कांडीवाली ( पश्चिम ) मुंबई द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एस यूएन टी -11 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " SUNTRONICS " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/07/500 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

8522

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्केल के तल प्लेट और शीर्ष कवर में किए गए छेद के माध्यम से सील किया जाता है तथा इन छेदों में सील करने की तार डाल कर उस पर सीसा सील लगाई जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और "ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10* , 5 × 10* , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (264) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1792

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18, 2009/CHAITRA 28, 1931

[PART II-Sec . 3(ii) NewDelhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 961. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (ase the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approvalof Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods ofsustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " SUNT- 11 " series ofmediuen accuracy (Accuracy class- III ) and with brand name "SUNTRONICS" (hereinafter referred to as the said model), manufactured by M/s . Sundeep Scale, 302, Gyan Amrit Building, Irani Wadi , Madhurdas Cross Road, Kandiwali (W) , Muumbai , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/500;

The saidmodel is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument ( Tabletop type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg. and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ' e' is 5g. It has atare devicewith a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

8522

Figure 2 Sealing diagram ofthe model

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg , with verification scale interval (n) inthe range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 100mg. to 2g. and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of5g. or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10% or 5x10%, where k is apositive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (264)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director ofLegal Metrology 1793 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 962.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स संदीप स्केल , 302 , ज्ञान अमृत बिल्डिंग , ईरानी वाडी, मधुरदास क्रॉस रोड , कांडीवाली ( पश्चिम ) मुंबई द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " एस यू एच-16 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " SUNTRONICS " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/07/501 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदनं प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त एक मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपद्द‌र्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट्स और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

8525

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्केल के तल प्लेट और शीर्ष कवर में किए गए छेद के माध्यम से सील किया जाता है तथा इन छेदों में सील करने की तार डाल कर उस पर सीसा सील लगाई जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से और 5000 कि. ग्राम. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 ×10%, 5× 10% , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णाक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 (264)/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1330GI/09-8 1794

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii ) ] NewDelhi , the 30th December, 2008

S.O. 962. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of high accuracy ( Accuracy class- II ) of Series " SUH- 6 " and with brand name " SUNTRONICS " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufacturedby M/s . Sundeep Scale, 302 , Gyan Amrit Building, Irani Wadi , Madhurdas Gross Road , Kandiwali ( W) , Mumbai , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/501;

The said model is a strain gauge type' load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 300kg and minimum capacity of 1kg . The verification scale interval ' e ' is 20g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) indicates the weighing results. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

8525

Figure-2 Sealing Diagram

The sealing is done through the holes made in the bottom plate and top cover of the indicator of the scale and sealing wire is passed through these holes and the lead seal is fixed on the wire . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k isa positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 (264)/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director ofLegal Metrology [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

1795

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 963. केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स संदीप स्केल, 302 , ज्ञान अमृत बिल्डिंग , ईरानी वाडी , मधुरदास क्रॉस रोड, कांडीवाली ( पश्चिम ) मुंबई द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एस यू पी-7 " श्रृंखला के स्वतः सूचक , अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " SUNTRONICS " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/07/502 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट्स, 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

8526 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्केल के तल प्लेट और शीर्ष कवर में किए गए छेद के माध्यम से सील किया जाता है तथा इन छेदों में सील करने की तार डाल कर उस पर सीसा सील लगाई जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से और 5000 कि. ग्राम. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10* , 2 × 10*, 5× 10 % , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (264 ) /2007 ) आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1796

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

NewDelhi , the30th December, 2008

S.O. 963. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figate given below) is in conformity with the provisions oftheStandards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standerds of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules, 1967 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-ssstions (7) and (8) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certifiente of approval of the Model of non-automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of Medium ascurasy (Accuracy class- III ) of Series "SUH - 7 " and with brand name "SUNTRONICS" (hereinafter refered to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Sundeep Scale, 302, Gyan Amrit Building, Irani Wadi , Madhurdes Cross Road, Kandiwali (W) , Mumbai , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/07/502;

The saidmodel is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg. and minimum capacity of 2 kg. The verifiontion scale interval ( e) is 100g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare elfect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

8526 Figure-2 Sealing provision of the indicator of model

Further, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Governmenthereby declares thatthis certificate.of.approval of the said model shail also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, necuracy and performance ofsame sariae svith maximian capacity above 50kg . and up to 5000kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k isa positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 ( 264)/2007]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1797

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 964.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है. और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इंडो टैक्नौ 10 , फ्रेंड सोसायटी , पोस्ट आफिस सावरकुण्डला , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 11 ) वाले " जे -4 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इंडो टैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्तमॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08 / 578 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है । उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 600 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 50 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरार 250 वोल्टेज , 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

other-side

Selling

100

TROND

Stamping-plat

wits-selling

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

तोलन उपकरण के इंडिकेटर को दो तरफ से सीलबंद किया जाता है पहली सीलिंग में गुंथित इस्पात तार को स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट, केबिनेट ढांचे के छेदों के जरिए तथा बाद में पिछली साइड प्लेट के जरिए तार को डाला जाता है तथा उसके बाद सीलबंद किया जाता है । दूसरी साइड में , गुंधित तार को केबिनेट ढांचे और पिछली साइड प्लेट के जरिए डाला जाता है और बाद में सीलबंद किया जाता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10* , 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 151 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1798

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii ) ]

NewDelhi , the 30th December, 2008

S.O. 964. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards ofWeights and Measures Act, 1976(60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

TheModel is a strain guage type load Cell based non -automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 600g. and minimum capacity of 1g. The verification scale interval (e) is 50mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Stamping-plat wits-selling

Figure-2 Schematic diagram ofthe Model

Sealing is done at the two sides of the weighing instrument. In the first sealing , twisted steel wire is passed through holes ofthe stamping plate, cabinet body and lastly through backside plate and then sealed. In the second side , twisted wire is passed through cabinet body and backside plate and then sealed . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg. to 50mg. and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of5000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10,2 × 10 or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM -21 ( 151 )/2008 )

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1803 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 ,1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ].

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 967.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स केरन एंड सोहन गेम्ब एच , जिगेलइ I , 72336 बलिंगन , जर्मनी द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले " एबीटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " केरन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात्उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स एवन वेइंग सिस्टम लि. , 15 , बी विंग , दूसरा तल , कमल कुंज, मेघा एच एस जी सोसायटी , एस वी रोड , अंधेरी ( वेस्ट ) , मुंबई -400 058 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणित किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/ 08 /553 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो मैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पेनसेशन प्रिंसीपल पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 220 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 मि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई) 1 मि.ग्रा. है और सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( डी) 0.01/0.1 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टिल डायोड ( एल सी डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । भॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण की बाडी और स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट में छेद ड्रिल करके सीलिंग की जाती है तब इन छेदों में सील तार गुजार कर लीड सील से सील किया जाता है । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 या ऊपर की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10*, 2× 10% , 5 × 10*, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 216 )/2008 ]

आर. माधुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1804

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009 /CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

NewDelhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 967. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights andMeasures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub-sections (7) and (8) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy class -1) of series " ABT " and with brand name "KERN" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Kem & Sohn GmbH , Ziegelei 1,72336 Balingen,Germany and marketed in Indiawithout any alteration before or after sale by M/s . Avon Weighing Systems Ltd. , 15, ' B ' Wing, 2nd Floor, Kamal Kunj , S. V. Road, Andheri (W) , Mumbai-400 058 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/553;

The said model is an Electro Magnetic Force Compensation principle based non-automatic weighing instrument with a maximurn capacity of220gund minimum capacity of 100mg. The verification scale interval ( e) is Img and scale interval (d) is 0.01/0.1mg. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Figure 2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done by drilling holes in the body of the instrument and stamping plate then a seal wire is passed through these holes which are sealed by applying lead seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model isgiven above .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- coction ( 12 ) of section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe saidmodel shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, acouracy and parlemmer of sune servieswithoutuum capacity upto 50kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of50,000 orabove for 'e' valkureifing, orwere anal with' c ' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10%, where k is a positive or negative whole number equal to awo factured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (216)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1805 [भाग 1 ] - खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 968.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स केरन एंड सोहन गेम्ब एच, जिगेलड़ 1 , 72336 बलिंगन , जर्मनी द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले " पी एल एस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " केरन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स एवन वेइंग सिस्टम्स लि. , 15 , बी विंग , दूसरा तल , कमल कुंज , मेघा एच एस जी सोसायटी, एस वी रोड, अंधेरी ( वेस्ट) , मुंबई -400 058 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08 / 552 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है । उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो मैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पेनसेशन प्रिंसीपल पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 4000 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 10 मि. ग्रा. है और सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( डी) 10 मि.ग्रा. । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टिल डायोड ( एल सी डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

KERN

FARS

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण की बाडी और स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट में छेद ड्रिल करके सीलिंग की जाती है तब इन छेदों में सील तार गुजार कर लीड सील से सील किया जाता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 या ऊपर की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 *, 5× 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 216 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1806

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]

NewDelhi , the 30th December, 2008

S.O. 968. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non-automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy class - I ) of Series " PLS " and with brand name " KERN" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s . Kern and Sohn GmbH , Ziegelei I , 72336 Balingen, Germany and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/s . Avon Weighing Systems Ltd. , 15, ' B' Wing, 2nd Floor , Kamal Kunj , S. V. Road, Andheri (W), Mumbai -400 058 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/552;

The said model is an Electro Magnetic Force Compensation Principle based non -automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of4000g and minimum capacity of 1g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 10mg . and scale interval (d) is 10mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Liquid Crystal Diode (LCD ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 and Figure - 2 Schematic.diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done by drilling holes in the body of the instument and stamping plate then a seal wire is passed through these holes which are sealed by applying lead seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12) ofSection 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of50,000 or above for ' e ' value of Img or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (216 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1807 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर, 2008

का.आ. 969.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता . बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो मैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पेनसेशन प्रिंसीपल पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 4000 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) 10 मि. ग्रा. और सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( डी ) 10 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टिल डायोड ( एल सी डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

KERN

TARE

CAI

OFF

TARE

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगें क 1 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 या ऊपर की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (216)/2008]

आर माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1808

[PART II SEC. 3( ) ] .

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 18 , 2009/ CHAITRA28 , 1931

NewDelhi , the 30th December,2008

S.O. 969. Whereas the Central Government, aßer considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976(60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections ( 7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non-automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy class-1 ) of Series "PLJ " and with brand name "KERN" (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s . Kern and Sohn Gmb H, Ziegelei I , 72336 Balingen, Germany and marketed in India without any altuation before or aßer sale by M/ s . Avon Weighing Systems Ltd. , 15, ' B' Wing, 2nd Floor, Kamal Kunj , S. V. Road, Andheri (W), Mumbai-400 058, Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/551 ;

The said model is an Electro Magnetic Force Compensation Principle based non-automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of4000g and minimum capacity of 1g. The verification scale interval (e) is 10ng. and scale interval (d) is 10mg. It has atare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Liquid Crystal Diode (LCD) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 and Figure- 2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Further, inexercise ofthe powers conferredby sub- section ( 12) ofSection 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate ofapproval ofthe said model shell also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilarmake, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 30kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range 50,000 or above for ' e' value of Img or more and with ' e' value of 1x 10%, 2 × 10% or 5x10k , where k is a positive ornegative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (216)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1809 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009 /चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 970.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स केरन एंड सोहन गेम्ब एच , जिगेलइ I , 72336 बलिंगन , जर्मनी द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले " ईडब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " केरन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स एवन बेइंग सिस्टम्स लि. , 15 , बी विंग , दूसरा तल , कमल कुंज , मेघा एच एस जी सोसायटी , एस बी रोड , अंधेरी ( वेस्ट) , मुंबई -400 058 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 08 / 550 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रोमैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पेनसेशन प्रिंसीपल पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 120 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 मि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 1 मि. ग्रा. है और सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( डी) 0.2 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टिल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

KERN

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रभाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 या ऊपर की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 ×10 *, 2 × 10 *, 5× 10 *, " के " हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 216 ) / 2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1330 G1/09-10 1810

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] New Delhi , the 30th December, 2008

S.O. 970. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of special accuracy ( Accuracy class - 1 ) of Series " EW " and with brand name "KERN " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/ s . Kern and Sohn Gmb H , Ziegelei 1 , 72336 Balingen, Germany and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/ s . Avon Weighing Systems Ltd. , 15, ' B' Wing, 2nd Floor, Kamal Kunj , S. V. Road , Andheri (W) , Mumbai -400 058 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/550;

The said model is an Electro Magnetic Force Compensation Principle based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 120g and minimum capacity of 100mg . The verification scale interval (e) is Img . and scale interval (d) is 0.2mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Figure 2: Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of50,000 or above for ' e ' value of 1 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10% or 5 × 10 %, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been mactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 216)/2008]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1811

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 971.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स केरन एंड सोहन गेम्ब एच , जिगेलई 1 , 72336 बलिंगन , जर्मनी द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले " पीसीबी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " केरन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स एवन वेइंग सिस्टम्स लि. , 15 , बी विंग , दूसरा तल , कमल कुंज , मेघा एच एस जी सोसायटी , एस वी रोड, अंधेरी ( वेस्ट) , मुंबई-400 058 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08 /549 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है । उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 241 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 मि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 1 मि. ग्रा. है और सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( डी ) 1. मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टिल डायोड ( एल सी डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

KERN

PCB Μαν 2419 Μπ.6.10 d001g Classif

Memory

SET

MODE

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण की बाडी और स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट में छेद ड्रिल करके सीलिंग की जाती है तब इन छेदों में सील तार गुजार कर सील से सील किया जाता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिनसे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " भान के लिए 50,000 या ऊपर की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2 × 10 के, 5× 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 216 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1812

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/ CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]

New Delhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 971. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication ofspecial accuracy (Accuracy class -1 ) of Series " PCB " and with brand name "KERN" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/ s . Kern and Sohn Gmb H, Ziegelei 1 , 72336 Balingen, Germany and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/s . Avon Weighing Systems Ltd. , 15 , 'B ' Wing, 2nd Floor, Kamal Kunj , S. V. Road, Andheri (W) , Mumbai -400 058 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/549;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of241g and minimum capacity of 100mg. The verification scale interval ( e) is Img. and scale interval (d) is Img. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

Schematic diagram of realing provision of the model

Further , in exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section ( 12) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracyand performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of50,000 or above for ' e ' value of Img or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the sane materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (216)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1813

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 972.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स डिजिटा कम्प्यूटर सर्विस , एस सी ओ- 1008-09 , ( प्रथम तल ) , बस स्टेण्ड के सामने , सैक्टर 22 - बी, चण्डीगढ़ -160022 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " डी जी टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " डीजो टोन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08/105 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 बोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

A1369

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

इंडिकेटर की तल प्लेट और उसके सामने छेद करके , इन छेदों में से तार निकाल कर तार पर लीड सील से सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और bela 1× 10 * , 2× 10 *, 5 × 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (41 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक विधिक माप विज्ञान 1814

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/ CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[ PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 972. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type ) with digital indication of " DGT" series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " DIGI TONE" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Digita Computer Sercice , SCO -1008-09, 1st Floor) , Opp . Bus Stand, Sec . 22 - B , Chandigarh - 160022 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/105;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Tabletop type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg . and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e ) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

A1369

Sealing diagram of the model .

Sealing is done through the holes made in the bottom plate and front of the scate , then a wire is passed through these holes and the lead seal is fixed on the wire . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make. accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg. with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg. to 2g . and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2x10 or 5 × 10 * , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM- 21 (41 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1815 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 973.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मैप इक्विपमेंट , 1 नार्थ ब्रिज रोड , 18-01 हाई-स्ट्रीट सेंटर, सिंगापुर -179094 द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग II वाले " स्टील टेप मैजर " के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सनगोल्ड " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स आई एल के इम्पेक्स, डी- 117-ए/ 1 , फेज- V, फोकल प्वांइट, लुधियाना-10 , पंजाब द्वारा बिक्री से पूर्व या बाद में बिना किसी बदलाव के भारत में विपणीत किया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08 / 138 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल स्टील टेप मैजर ( स्टील फीता माप ) है इसकी अधिकतम लम्बाई 3 मीटर है तथा न्यूनतम भाग । मिलीमीटर है जिसका उपयोग लम्बाई को मापने के लिए किया जाता है । इसका आधार पीला तथा मिलीमीटर की मार्किंग काले में और सेंटीमीटर लाल रंग में है । फीते की चौड़ाई 12.6 मिलीमीटर है तथा इसकी मोटाई 0.31 मिलीमीटर है ।

(SUNGOLD)

Super

MEASURING TAPE 3m

PFAD PHINLING

L.L.K IMPEX

mat Point, udhiana

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 70 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1816

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/ CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 30th December, 2008

S.O. 973. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by the third provisoto sub - section (3 ) and sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval ofthe Model of' Steel Tape Measure' , of Accuracy class - II with brand name " SUNGOLD " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/ s . MAP Equipments , I North Bridge Road , 18-01 High Street Centre , Singapore- 179094 and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/s . ILK Impex, D - 117 -A/ 1 , Phase-V, Focal Point , Ludhiana- 10, Punjab and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/ 138 ;

The said model is a steel tape measure of maximum length 3m and smallest division is of 1 mm which is used for measurement of lenght. Its base is yellow and marking of millimeter in black and centimeter in red colour . The width ofthe tape is 12.6 mm and thickness of tape is 0.31 mm.

3號

I.L.K IMPEX

D- 117 /A/1 , Phase V Focal Point, Ludhiana

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Governinent hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the steel tape measure of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series in the range of 0.5m to 5m manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (70)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1817 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 974.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट और इस उद्देश्य के लिए अधिसूचित निकाय , एन एम आई नीदरलैंड मीटिन्सिटट्‌यूट द्वारा अनुमोदित और स्वीकृत परिणामों और पैटर्न मूल्यांकन रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माय मानक अधिनियम , 1976( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की सम्भावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यर्थाथता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की उपधारा ( 3 ) के परन्तुक और धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स Krohne Altometer , Kerkeplaat 12, 3313 LC/ dordrecht , the Nertherlands द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग 0.3 वाले " पानी के अलावा अन्य तरल के लिए मापन प्रणाली " नामतः मापन ट्रांसड्यूसर ( अल्ट्रासोनिक ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ALTOSONIC III " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे भारत में मैसर्स क्रोने मार्शल प्रा. लि. , ए 34/35 , एमआईडीसी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , एच ब्लाक, पिम्परी , पुणे -411 018 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 13/08 /436 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल " पानी के अलावा अन्य तरल के लिए मापन प्रणाली " का घटक है , नामतः मापन ट्रांसड्यूसर ( अल्ट्रासोनिक ) इसको इलैक्ट्रानिक परिकलन और सूचक यंत्र, दबाव और तापमान ट्रांसमीटर आदि से " पानी के अलावा अन्य तरल के लिए मापन प्रणाली " के पूर्ण मॉडल को बनाने के लिए जोड़ा गया है , जिसे अपने मॉडल के लिए अलग से अनुमोदित किया गया है । मापन ट्रांसड्‌यूसर 2 निर्माण एककों से बना है । प्रवाह सेंसर का पहला एकक , जो 3 मापन रास्तों पर विकर्णत लगाया गया एक बेलनाकार पाइप है । प्रत्येक रास्ते पर अल्ट्रासोनिक ध्वनि सिग्नल उत्पन्न करने और मापने के लिए 2 ट्रांसड्‌यूसर लगाए गए हैं । दूसरा एक सिग्नल परिवर्तक है । पानी के अलावा अन्य द्रव्यों के लिए मापन प्रणाली के पूर्ण मॉडल के अनुमोदन के लिए प्रणाली के अन्य घटकों के साथ घटक की उपयुक्तता का परिक्षण किया जाता/मीटर के विभिन्न आकारों (4.5 सें मी. से 40 सें मी. ) पर आधारित इसकी अधिकतम प्रवाह दर 73m³/h से 4670 m³/h की रेंज में है । परिचालन तापमान की रेंज -25 °C से + 180 °C है और अधिकतम प्रचालन दाब +124 बार है ।

मॉडल सीलिंग व्यवस्था का स्कीमवार डायग्राम

मॉडल को उसकी सामग्री , यथार्थता , डिजाइन , सर्किट डायग्राम कार्यकारी सिद्धांत आदि की शर्तों के सम्बन्ध में परिवर्तित नहीं किंवा जाएगा । मॉडल सीलिंग व्यवस्था का स्कीमवार डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 207 ) /2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1330GI /09-11 1818

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)]

New Delhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 974. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, along with the pattern evaluation report and the test results granted and approved by the NMI Netherlands Mettinstituut, a notified body for the purpose in the Netherlands , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to sub - section (3 ) and sub -sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of model ofa component ofthe "Measuring system for the liquids other than water" , namely measurement transducer (ultrasonic) ofaccuracy class 0.3 and with brand name "ALTOSONIC III " (hereinafter referred to as the model ) , manufactured byM/s . KrohneAltometer, Kerkeplaat 12, 3313 LC Dordrecht, the Netherlands and marketed in India by M/s . Krohne Marshall Pvt . Ltd. , A 34/35 , MIDC Industrial Area, H Block, Pimpri , Pune-411018 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/13/08/436;

Thesaid model is a compotent of the " Measuring system for the liquids other than water " namely , measurement transducer (ultrasonic). It is to be connected to an electronic calculating and indicating device , pressure & temperature transmitter etc.to make up a complete model of" Measuring system for liquids other than water " which is to be approved of its model separately and independently. The measurement transducer consists of two constructional units . The first unit is the flow sensor , which mainly a cylindrical pipe with three measurements paths diagonally mounted. Each path is equipped with two transducers for generating and measuring the ultrasonic sound single . The second unit is the signal converter . For approval of the complete model of measuring system for liquids other than water the applicability of the component with the other components in system is to be tested . Its maximum flow rate range 73 m³ /h to 4670 m³h depending on different size (4.5cm to 40cm) of the meters . The operating temperature range is from -25 ° C to + 180 ° C and the maximum operating pressure is + 124 bar .

The model shall not be changed in terms of its material , accuracy, design, circuit diagram , working principle etc.A typical schematic diagram of the sealing arrangement of the model is given above.

[F. No. WM-21 (207)/2007 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1819 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 975.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और भाप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मदूरै मीट्रिक वर्क्स , # 22 - ए, ( 49 ) , तिरूमलाई रायर पाडीथूरै , सिम्मक्कल , मदुरै -625001 तमिल नाडु द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता (यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " आर जे " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटॉप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड कानाम " रंगा " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/ 09/08/521 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

तोलन स्केल के बाई ओर ऊपरी कवर और तल प्लेट को काटते हुए दो छेद किए जायेंगे और सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए इन दो छेदों के जरिए सीसायुक्त तार से कसा जायेगा । सील को तोड़े बिना उपकरण को खोला नहीं जा सकेगा । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 ×10*, 2 × 10*, 5× 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 196 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1820

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 975. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) of series " RJ " and with brand name "RANGA" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured byM/ s. Madurai Metric Works , # 22- A, (49 ) , Thirumalai Rayar padithurai , Simmakkal , Madurai - 625001 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/521 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

ClassIt,Model-RJ30

Max-30kg,Min100gm,e2gm

Figure 2 Schematic diagram of the model

From the left of the weighing scale two holes are made by cutting the upper cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of100 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 *, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured bythe same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 196 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1821

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 976.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मदूरै मीट्रिक वर्क्स, # 22 - ए , ( 49 ) , तिरुमलाई रायर पार्डीथूरै, सिम्मक्कल , मदुरै -625001 तमिल नाडु द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " आर पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " रंगा " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08/ 522 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * , 5× 10* , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 196 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक मापं विज्ञान 1822

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009 /CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II--SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 30th December, 2008

S.O. 976. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument(Platform type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series "RP" and with brand name " RANGA " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s . Madurai Metric Works , # 22-A, (49), Thirumalai Rayar padithurai , Simmakkal , Madurai -625001 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08 / 522;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg and minimum capacity of 4Kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 200g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Figure 2 : Sealing provision of the indicator of model

From the left of the indicator two holes are made by cutting the upper cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The instrument cannot be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 196 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1823 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 977.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मदुरै मीट्रिक वर्क्स, # 22 - ए, ( 49 ) , तिरूमलाई रायर पाडीथुरै , सिम्मक्कल , मदुरै-625001 तमिल नाडु द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " आर एच " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( हैंगिंग प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " रंगा " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08 / 523 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( हैंगिंग प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के , 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 196 )/2008 ] आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1824

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] New Delhi , the 30th December, 2008

S.O. 977. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Hanging type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " RH " and with brand name "RANGA " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Madurai Metric Works , # 22 - A, (49) , Thirumalai Rayar Padithurai , Simmakkal , Madurai - 625001 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08 / 523;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Hanging type ) with a maximum capacity of 100kg and minimum capacity of400g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 20g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

20am Sealing provision of the indicator of model .

From the left ofthe indicator two holes are made by cutting the upper cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The instrument cannot be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10,2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM -21 ( 196)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1825 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 978.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मदुरै मीट्रिक वर्क्स, # 22- ए, ( 49 ) , तिरूमलाई रायर पाडीथुरै , सिम्मक्कल , मदुरै-625001 तमिल नाडु द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " आर टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " रंगा " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/520 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

तोलन स्केल के बाईं ओर ऊपरी कवर और तल प्लेट को काटते हुए दो छेद किए जायेंगे और सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए इन दो छेदों के जरिए सीसायुक्त तार से कसा जायेगा । सील को तोड़े बिना उपकरण को खोला नहीं जा सकेगा । माडल को सीलबंद करने का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और "ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 196 )/2008 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माष विज्ञान 1330 G1/09-12 1826

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18, 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II SEC. 3(ii )]

NewDelhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 978. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with digital indication of " RT " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name "RANGA " (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/ s . Madurai Metric Works , # 22 -A , (49 ), Thirumalai Rayar Padithurai , Simmakkal , Madurai- 625001 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /08/ 520;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Tabletop type) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply.

Figure-2: Sealing diagram of the model .

From the left ofthe weighing scale two holes are made by cutting the upper cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make. accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . to 2g . and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x10 or 5 × 10 % , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 196 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1827 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 979.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मेटलर- टोलेडो ( एलब्सटड ) जीएमबी एच , 12 उन्टर डेम , मोलोस्फेल्सन 34 , डी-72423 एल्बस्टड , जर्मनी द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " बीबीए- II " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " मेटलर टोलेडो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) , जिसे भारत में बिक्री से पहले या बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के मैसर्स मैटलर- टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स, साकी विहार रोड , पोवई , मुंबई-400072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/ 2008 / 152 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त माडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 15 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) । ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयंतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपद‌र्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

स्केल के आगे के निचले हिस्से पर, छेद वाली नीचे की प्लेट पर पेचं लगाया गया है । बांधे गए 2 पेच जो पीछे के पेनल के एनक्लोजर को सुरक्षित रखते हैं, को सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए स्केल के साथ दी गई सीलिंग किट में 2 छेद वाले पेचों के साथ बदला गया है । स्केल को सील तोड़े बिना खोला नहीं जा सकता है । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा . से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 3 कि.ग्रा. से 35 कि.ग्रा. तक की क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 *, 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 78 ) /2008 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1828

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 30th December, 2008

S.O. 979. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of " BBA- II " series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "METTLER TOLEDO" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M/s . Mettler - Toledo (Albstadt ) GmbH, 12, Unter dem, Molosfelsen 34, D- 72423 Albstadt, Germany and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/ s . Mettler Toledo India Pvt . Ltd. , Amar Hills , Saki Vihar Road , Powai , Mumbai -400072 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/152;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 15kg and minimum capacity of 50g. The verification scale intervel (e) is 1g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent substractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hz alternate current power supply .

Figure-2: Schematic diagram of the model .

At the front bottom of the scale , a bored screw is fixed to the bottom plate consisting of a hole. The two fastener screws that secure the rear panel to the enclosure are replaced with the two holes screws in the sealing kit provided with the scale for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The scale can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with capacities comprising of 3kg to 35kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x 10k , or 5x 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 (78 )/2008 )

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1829

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 980.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मेटलर- टोलेडो ( एलब्सटड ) जीएमबी एच , 12 उन्टर डेम , मोलोस्फेल्सन 34 , डी-72423 एल्बस्टड , जर्मनी द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " बीबीके- II " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " मेटलर टोलेडो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) , जिसे भारत में बिक्री से पहले या बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के मैसर्स मैटलर- टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स , साकी विहार रोड , पोवई , मुंबई-400072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /2008 / 151 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त माडल एक इलैक्ट्रोमैग्नेटिक फोर्स कम्पनसेशन सिद्धान्त पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 15 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 25 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 0.5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है । जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

TOLEDO

000 000 000 000

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्केल के आगे के निचले हिस्से पर , छेद वाली नीचे की प्लेट पर पेच लगाया गया है । बांधे गए 2 पेच जो पीछे के पेनल के एनक्लोजर को सुरक्षित रखते हैं , को सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए स्केल के साथ दी गई सीलिंग किट में 2 छेद वाले पेचों के साथ बदला गया है । स्केल को सील तोड़े बिना खोला नहीं जा सकता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 5. ,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 3000 ग्रा. से 35 कि.ग्रा. तक की क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (78 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1830

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009 / CHAITRA 28、1931

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 980. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority. is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with digital indication of " BBK - II " series of high accuracy ( accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " METTLER TOLEDO " (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Mettler - Toledo ( Albstadt) GmbH, 12, Unter dem , Molosfelsen 34, D- 72423 Albstadt , Germany and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/s . Mettler Toledo India Pvt . Ltd. , Amar Hills, Saki Vihar Road , Powai , Mumbai - 400072 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08 / 151 ;

The said model is an Electro Magnetic Force Compensation Principle based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 15kg and minimum capacity of25g . The verification scale intervel ( e) is 0.5g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent substractive retained tare effect. The Liquid Cryst ! Diode ( LCD ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hz alternative current power supply.

Figure-2: Schematic diagram of the model

Atthe front bottom of the scale , a bored screw is fixed to the bottom plate consisting of a hole . The two fastener screws that secure the rear panel to the enclosure are replaced with the two holes screws in the sealing kit provided with the scale for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The scale can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with capacities comprising of 3000g to 35kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to -50,000 for ' e' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10 % , or 5x 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 78 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1831 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 981.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मेटलर- टोलेडो ( एलब्सटड ) जीएमबी एच , 12 उन्टर डेम , मोलोस्फेल्सन 34 , डी-72423 एल्बस्टड, जर्मनी द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " बीबीए- पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " मेटलर टोलेडो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) , जिसे भारत में बिक्री से पहले या बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के मैसर्स मैटलर- टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स, साकी विहार रोड, पोवई , मुंबई-400072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09 / 2008 / 153 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 250 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है । जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्केल के आगे के निचले हिस्से पर , छेद वाली नीचे की प्लेट पर पेच लगाया गया है । बांधे गए 2 पेच जो पीछे के पेनल के एनक्लोजर को सुरक्षित रखते हैं, को सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए स्केल के साथ दी गई सीलिंग किट में 2 छेद वाले पेचों के साथ बदला गया है । स्केल को सील तोड़े बिना खोला नहीं जा सकता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 60 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 ×10,5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 78 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1832

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii)] New Delhi, the 30th December, 2008

S.O. 981. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type) with digital indication of " BBA- P" series of high accuracy (accuracy class - II) and with brand name "METTLER TOLEDO" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model), manufactured by M/ s . Mettler-Toledo (Albstadt) GmbH, 12, Unter dem , Molosfelsen 34 , D- 72423 Albstadt, Germany and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/ s . Mettler Toledo India Pvt. Ltd. , Amar Hills , Saki Vihar Road , Powai , Mumbai -400072, Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/2008/ 153 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Platform Type) with a maximum capacity of60kg . and minimum capacity of250g . The verification scale intervel ( e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a100 percent substractive retained tare effect. The Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure-2: Schematic diagram of the model

Atthe front bottom of the scale , a bored screw is fixed to the bottom plate consisting of a hole . The two fastener screws that secure the rear panel to the enclosure are replaced with the two holes screws in the sealing kit provided with the scale for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The scale can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make, accuracy and performance of same series with capacities 60kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10t, or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (78 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1833 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 982.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल ग्रथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मेटलर- टोलेडो (एलब्सटड ) जीएमबी एच , 12 उन्टर डेम, मोलोस्फेल्सन 34 , डी-72423 एल्बस्टड , जर्मनी द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले " बीबीके- I " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " मेटलर टोलेडो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) , जिसे भारत में बिक्री से पहले या बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के मैसर्स मैटलर- टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स , साकी बिहार रोड, पोवई , मुंबई-400072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/ 2008 / 150 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रोमैग्नेटिक फोर्स कम्पनसेशन सिद्धान्त आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 3000 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 10 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

MonoBloc

600 900

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्केल के आगे के निचले हिस्से पर, छेद वाली नीचे की प्लेट पर पेच लगाया गया है । बांधे गए 2 पेच जो पीछे के पेनल के एनक्लोजर को सुरक्षित रखते हैं , को सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए स्केल के साथ दी गई सीलिंग किट में 2 छेद वाले पेचों के साथ बदला गया है । स्केल को सील तोड़े बिना खोला नहीं जा सकता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 3000 ग्रा. से 35 कि. ग्रा. तक की क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 78 )/2008 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1330G1/09-13 1834

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/ CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) )

New Delhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 982. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy class - I ) of series " BBK - I " and with brand name "METTLER TOLEDO" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Mettler - Toledo (Albstadt) GmbH , 12, Unter dem, Molosfelsen 34, D-72423 Albstadt, Germany and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/ s . Mettler Toledo India Pvt . Ltd. , Amar Hills , Saki Vihar Road, Powai , Mumbai -400072 , Maharashtra andwhich is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /08/150;

The said model is an Electro Magnetic Force Compensation Principle based non- automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 3000g and minimum capacity of 1g . The verification scale intervel (e ) is 10mg . It has a tare device with a 100 percent substractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hz alternative current power supply .

Figure-2: Schematic diagram of the model

At the front bottom of the scale , a bored screw is fixed to the bottom plate consisting of a hole . The two fastener screws that secure the rear panel to the enclosure are replaced with the two holes screws in the sealing kit provided with the scale for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The scale cannot be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with capacities comprising of 3000g , to 35kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of50,000 or above for ' e ' value of Img . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2x 10 % , or 5x 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufacturedby the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 78)/2008)

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1835

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर, 2008

का.आ. 983.--केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित माडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मेटलर - टोलेडो ( च्यांगनु ) स्केल्स एंड सिस्टम्स लि. , 12 , कुनलुन रोड, च्यांगझु , जिआंगसु, चाइना पी आर सी द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " पीटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( पालेट ट्रक स्केल ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " मेटलर टोलेडो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) , जिसे भारत में बिक्री से पहले या बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के मैसर्स मैटलर - टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स , साकी विहार रोड , पोवई , मुंबई -400072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 08 / 149 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त माडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( पालेट ट्रक स्केल ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 2000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है । जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

माडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

इंडीकेटर के दायीं तरफ पीछे के हिस्से में, सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील के लिए लीड तार को बांधने के लिए बाहरी कवर और अंदर की प्लेट को काटकर छेद किए गए हैं । इंडीकेटर को सील तोड़े बिना खोला नहीं जा सकता है । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित माडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उसे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10,5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (78 ) /2008 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1836

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 30th December, 2008

S.O. 983. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and ( 8) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Pallet Truck Scale) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series "PT " and with brand name " METTLER TOLEDO " (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M/s . Mettler -Toledo (Changzhou) Scales & Systems Ltd. , 12 , Kunlun Road, Changzhou , Jiangsu , China P.R.C. and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/ s . Mettler Toledo India Pvt . Ltd. , Amar Hills , Saki Vihar Road , Powai , Mumbai -400072, Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08 / 149;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Pallet Truck Scale ) with amaximum capacity of 2000kg and minimum capacity of20kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 2kg. It has a tare device with a 100 percent substractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-2: Sealing diagram of the model

On the rear right side of the indicator holes are made by cutting the outer cover and the inner plate for fastening a leaded wire to receive the verification stamp and seal . The indicator cannot be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 5000kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2× 10 %, or 5 × 10* , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 78 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1837 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का. आ. 984.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मैटलर - टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स , साकी विहार रोड , पोवई, मुंबई-400072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " INDxxxT ( II ) " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप मल्टी रेंज सुविधा के साथ ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " मेटलर टोलेडो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08 /145 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप मल्टी रेंज सुविधा के साथ ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है । जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड (एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

इंडीकेटर के दायीं तरफ पीछे के हिस्से में , सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील के लिए लीड तार को बांधने के लिए बाहरी कवर और अंदर की प्लेट को काटकर छेद किए गए हैं । इंडीकेटर को सील तोड़े बिना खोला नहीं जा सकता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10,5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 78 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1838

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) )

New Delhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 984.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections ( 7) and (8 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top Type with multi range facility ) with digital indication of " INDxxxT ( II ) " series of high accuracy (accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " METTLER TOLEDO " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/ s . Mettler Toledo India Pvt . Ltd. , Amar Hills , Saki Vihar Road. Powai , Mumbai -400072 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/ 145;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top Type with multi range facility) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale intervel (e) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hz alternative current power supply .

Figure- 2: Sealing diagram of the model

On the rear right side of the indicator holes are made by cutting the outer cover and the inner plate for fastening a leaded wire to receive the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of100mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k, or 5x 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (78 ) /2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1839 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 985.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मैटलर- टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स , साकी विहार रोड, पोवई, मुंबई-400072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " INDxxxT( III ) " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप मल्टी रेंज सुविधा के साथ ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " मेटलर टोलेडो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/08 / 146 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप मल्टी रेंज सुविधा के साथ ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है । जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

इंडीकेटर के दायीं तरफ पीछे के हिस्से में, सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील के लिए लीड तार को बांधने के लिए बाहरी कवर और अंदर की प्लेट को काटकर छेद किए गए हैं । इंडीकेटर को सील तोड़े बिना खोला नहीं जा सकता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान । × 10 , 2 × 10,5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 78 ) /2008 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1840

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi, the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 985. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top Type with multi range facility) with digital indication of " INDxxxT ( III ) " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III) and with brand name " METTLER TOLEDO" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Mettler Toledo India Pvt . Ltd. , Amar Hills , Saki Vihar Road , Powai , Mumbai - 400072 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/146;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Table top Type with multi range facility) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale intervel (e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure- 2: Sealing diagram of the model

On the rear right side of the indicator holes are madeby cutting the outer cover and the inner plate for fastening a leaded wire to receive the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument ofsimilar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k, or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 (78 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1841 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008.

का.आ. 986.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों काअनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मैटलर- टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स , साकी विहार रोड, पोवई, मुंबई-400072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " INDxxxP ( II ) " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप मल्टी रेंज सुविधा के साथ ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " मेटलर टोलेडो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/08/ 147 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप मल्टी रेंज सुविधा के साथ ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 600 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2.5 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है । जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

इंडीकेटर के दायीं तरफ पीछे के हिस्से में , सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील के लिए लीड तार को बांधने के लिए बाहरी कवर और अंदर की प्लेट को काटकर छेद किए गए हैं । इंडीकेटर को सील तोड़े बिना खोला नहीं जा सकता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और कैन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से और 5,000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10,5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक फूलक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

.[ फर्म. सं. डब्ल्यू.एम-21 (78 )/2008]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1330 GI /09-14 1842

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[ PART II SEC. 3 ( ii )]

New Delhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 986. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferredby sub-sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Plateform Type with multi range facility ) with digital indication of " INDxxxP ( II) " series of high accuracy (accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " METTLER TOLEDO " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Mettler Toledo India Pvt . Ltd. , Amar Hills , Saki Vihar Road, Powai , Mumbai -400072 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/147;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Platform Type with multi range facility) with a maximum capacity of 600kg and minimum capacity of 2.5kg . The verification scale intervel (e) is 50g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-2: Sealing diagram of the model

Onthe rear right side of the indicator holes are made by cutting the outer cover and the inner plate for fastening a leaded wire to receive the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers corconferred by sub-section ( 12) ofsection 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval(n) inthe range of 5,000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x 10k, or 5x 10% , where k isa positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (78 )/2008]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1843 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 30 दिसम्बर , 2008

का.आ. 987.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता.... बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मैटलर- टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स, साकी विहार रोड, पोवई, मुंबई -400072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " INDxxxP ( III) " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप मल्टी रेंज सुविधा के साथ ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " मेटलर टोलेडो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08 / 148 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप मल्टी रेंज सुविधा के साथ ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै । जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

इंडीकेटर के दायीं तरफ पीछे के हिस्से में , सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील के लिए लीड तार को बांधने के लिए बाहरी कवर और अंदर की प्लेट को काटकर छेद किए गए हैं । इंडीकेटर को सील तोड़े बिना खोला नहीं जा सकता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से और 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 78 )/2008 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 1844

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC. 3( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 30th December , 2008

S.O. 987.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type with multi range facility) with digital indication of " INDxxxP ( III ) " series of medium accuracy (accuracy class- HI ) and with brand name "METTLER TOLEDO" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Mettler Toledo India Pvt . Ltd. , Amar Hills , Saki Vihar Road, Powai , Mumbai -400072 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/ 148;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type with multi range facility) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg. and minimum capacity of 4kg. The verification scale intervel ( e) is 200g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure-2: Sealing diagram of the model

Onthe rear right side of the indicator holes are made by cutting the outer cover and the inner plate for fastening a leaded wire to receive the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate ofapproval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg. and up to 5000kg . with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10k, or 5x 10 , where k is apositive or nogative whole wiber or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance the same principle, dorign and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 (78)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1845

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली, 31 मार्च, 2009

का.आ. 988.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के नियम 4 के उप विनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए है , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :

अनुसूची

भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

अनु वर्ष

लाईसेन्सधारी का नाम व पता

भामा भाग संख्या

स्वीकृत करने की तिथिवर्ष/माह

लाईसेन्स सं

क्रम सं

( 7 ) (8 ) ( 9 )

(5)

(6)

(4)

(2) (3)

(1)

1994

398 04 4-12-2008

1. 7892001

एलुमिनियम कंडकटर फार ओवरहेड ट्रांसमिशन परपस

सुयोग इलैक्ट्रिकल लिमिटेड 24, अरूणोदय सोसाइटी

पार्ट 4

अलकापुरी , बडोदा

1999

1417

3-12-2008

7891201

पी. एच. आर्ट

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों शिल्पकारी

शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

बी 1 , नीरधवल अपार्टमैंट , सरदार पटेल सेवा समाज हाल के पास , नवरंगपुरा , अहमदाबाद

1999

गायत्री ज्वैलर्स

3-12-2008

1417

3. 7891908

282, वानियाबाड

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों शिल्पकारी

किला पारडी 396 125

शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

1999

1417

शिल्याज्वैलर्स

4. 7892203 5-12-2008

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

शॉप नंबर 1 , रामेश्वरम काम्पलैक्स, शुभलक्ष्मी अपार्टमेंट के सामने , सिटी लाइट रोड, सूरत

1999

पटेल तथा पटेल ज्वैलर्स

15-12-2008

5. 7893508

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं 1417 के आभूषणों शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

सर्वे नंबर 347 , शॉप नंबर 2 , 68 प्रभुकृपा सोसाइटी , स्पिनिंग मिल, पुनागाम सूरत

1999 7895310-24-12-2008

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं 1417

मातृछाया बैंगलस वर्कस

शॉप नंबर 4 , पुनित शॉपिंग के आभूषणों शिल्पकारी

शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

सैंटर, बालाजी रोड सूरत

1999

1417

आई श्री खोडियार ज्वैलर्स

31-12-2008

7897112

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों शिल्पकारी

शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

1 , लक्ष्मी मार्केट , कल्पना सोसाइटी के पास , डी केबिन , साबरमती , अहमदाबाद 380 019

2004

2148

8-12-2008

नीमास्विचगीयर

7892304

फ्लेमप्नुफ एनकलोसर फार इलैक्ट्रिकल एपरेटस

सी 1 2609 , 3 फेस,

जी आई डी सी, वलसाद

8034 2002 3-12-2008

सबमर्सिबल पम्पसैट

7891807

डेल्टा मकैनिकल तथा इलैक्ट्रिकल इंडस्ट्रीज , सी 1 , 201 , जी आई सीअनटालिया , वाया बिलीमोरा ता गणदेवी , नवसारी 1846

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

(2)

(1)

(3)

(4)

10. 7890502 1-12-2008 भावना इंडस्ट्रीज आई टी आई कालेज के सामने खेडा

11. 7892405 8-12-2008

सफायर स्त्रींग वाटर प्रा. लि. 108 , डाक्टर अंबेडकर शॉपिंग सेंटर, रिंग रोड सूरत 12. 7895916 30-12-2008 भागवद धवज मार्केटिंग प्रा . लि. सर्वे नंबर 2/5 , शोला गाम, तलाब किनारे के पास , ता दसकॉय , अहमदाबाद 13. 7896009 30-12-2008 जे पी बिवरेज , प्लाट नंबर 20 , धुमा गाम , ए एम टी एस क्स स्टैंड के सामने धुमा अहमदाबाद

17-12-2008

14. 7894207

क्राम्पटन ग्रीक्स लिमिटेड बडोदा लैम्प वकर्स गाँव कुराल , पादरा जंबूसर रोड, ता पादरा बडोदा

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] (5)

(6) ( 7) ( 8 ) ( 9 ) पैकेजबंद पेयजल

14543

2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल

14543

2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल

14543

2004

2004 पैकेजबंद पेथजल

14543

-2002

15111

सैल्फ बलास्टिड लैम्प फार जनरल लाइटिंग सर्विस पार्ट । तथा पार्ट 2

[सं . सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ] पी. के. गम्भीर, उपमहानिदेशक ( मुहर)

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

NewDelhi, the 31st March, 2009

S.O. 988.-In pursuance of sub- regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars ofwhich are given in the following schedule:

SCMIDULE

SI.No.

Grant Date

Name& Address of the Licences No.

party

(3)

(4)

(1) (2)

1. 7892001 4-12-2008

SuyogElectrical Ltd. 24, Arunoday Society, Alkapuri,Baroda 2. 7891201 3-12-2008

P.H. Art, B - 1 , Nirdhaval Apartment , Near Sardar Patel Seva Samaj Hall , Navrangpura Ahmedabad 3-12-2008

3. 7891908

Gayatri Jewellers , 282,Vaniyawad Killa, Pardi 396125 4. 7892203 5-12-2008

Shilpa Jewellers , Shop Nol , Rameshwaram Complex, Opp. Subhlaxmi Apartment, CityLight Road, Surat

Sec Year Title of the Standard Sl. Part No.

(5)

( 8 ) ( 9 )

(6) ( 7 )

398 IV

1994 Aluminium conductors for overhead transmiss- ion purposes: Part 4 Aluminium alloy stranded

1417 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking

1417 1999 Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking

1417 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

(2)

(3)

(4)

(1)

15-12-2008

5. 7893508

Patel& Patel Jewellers , Survey No.347 Shop No.2 68-Prabhukrupa Society, Behind Spining Mills , Punagam Surat. 24-12-2008

6 78925310

Mathruchhaya Bangles , Works, Shop No.2 , Punit Shopping Centre, Balaji Road, Surat .

31-12-2008

7897112

I Shree Khodiyar Jewellers , 1, Laxmi Market, Near Kalpna Society , D Cabin Sabarmati, Ahmedabad 380 019 8.

8-12-2008

7892304

Nema Switch Gear , C-1/2609 , Third Phase , G.I.D.C. Valsad 3-12-2008

9. 7891807

Delta Mechanical & Electrical Industries C- 1 / 201, G.I.D.C. Antalia ViaBilimora Tal, Gandevi , Distt. Navsari 10. 7890502 1-12-2008

Bhavna Industries , Opp. I TI College Kheda

11. 7892405 8-12-2008

Saffire Spring Water Pvt . Ltd. , 108, Dr. Ambedkar Shopping Centre Ring Road, Surat 30-12-2008

12. 7895916

Bhagvad Dhwaj Marketing , Pvt. Ltd. , Survey No. 2/5 SolaGam, Near Talav Kinare , Ta Daskroi Ahmedabad 30-12-2008

13. 7896009

J. P. Beverages , Plot No. 20, Ghuma Gam, Opp. A.M.T.S. Bus Stand, Ghuma, Ahmedabad 17-12-2008

14. 7894207

CromptonGreaves Ltd. , (Baroda Lamp Works) Vill . Kural, Padra Jambusar Road, Tal: Padra, Vadodara

1847

(6) ( 7) (8 ) ( 9 ) (5)

1417

1999 Gold and GoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking

1417 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking

1417 1999 Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking

2148 2004 Flameproof enclosures , forelectrical apparatus

8034 2002 Submersible Pumpsets ,

14543 2004 Packaged Drinking,

Water ( other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) IS 14543:2004

Packaged Drinking 14543 2004 Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) IS 14543:2004

14543 2004 Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) IS 14543:2004

14543 2004 Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) IS 14543: 2004

15111 2002 SelfBallasted Lamps for General Lighting Services (Part - 1 & Part-2)

[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ] P. K. GAMBHIR, Dy Director General (Marks)

नई दिल्ली , 31 मार्च , 2009

का.आ. 989.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम, 1988 के विनियम 5 के उप- विनियम ( 6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तारीख से रद्द/स्थगित कर दिया गया है । 1848

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

लाईसेन्सधारी का नाम और पता क्रम सं

लाईसेन्स सं. सीएम/एल

(3)

(2)

(1)

7359484 स्पीयरहाट वाटर हीटर प्रा. लि. , 6231 , जी आई डी सी इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट अंकलेश्वर 393 002

7533474 एन बी ई मोटर्स प्रा लि 1 से 7 , तिरूपति एस्टेट , बाम्बे हाउसिंग एवरेस्ट मिलन सिनेमा के सामने , सरसपुर , अहमदाबाद

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] अनुसूची

लाईसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/ प्रक्रम संबद्ध भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

रद्द करने कीतिथि (4)

(5)

15-12-2008 धर्मोस्टेट फार मूस विद इलैक्ट्रिक

वाटर हीटर

आई एस 3017: 1985

15-12-2008 फलेमनुक एपकलोलर फार इतेनिट्रकल एमरेटस , आई पड़ा 2148 : 2004

[सं. सी.एम.डी / 13:13 ]

पी. के. गंभीर , उपमहानिदेशक ( मुहर )

New Delhi , the 31st March , 2009

S.O. 889. In pursuance of sub -regulation (6) of regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations, 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which are given below have been cancelled/ suspended with effect from the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Licence No. CM/L

SI No.

Name and Address of the licensee

( 1)

(2)

(3)

1. 7359484 Sphreehet Water Heaters , Pvt . Ltd. , 623-1 , G.I. DC Indl. Estate, Ankleshwar -393 002 2.

7533474 NBE Motors Pvt . Ltd. 1 to7, Tirupati Estate,Opp. Bombay Housing Everest, MilanCinema, Saraspur, Almedabad

Date of Cancellation Article/Process with relevant Indian Standards covered by the licence cancelied

(4)

(5)

15-12-2008 Thermostats for use with electricwater hearters , IS3017:1985

15-12-2008 FlameproofEnclosures , IS2148:2004

[No. CMD/13:13 ] P. K. GAMBHIR, Dy Director General (Marks)

नई दिल्ली, 31 मार्च, 2009

का.आ. 990.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप नियम ( 1 ) के खखंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( कों) में संशोधन किया गया किये गये हैं :-

क्रम सं. संशोषित भारतीय मानक (कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

(1)

(2)

1 आई एस 12360 : 1988 की संशोधन संख्या 3

संसोधन की संख्या और तिथि संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि (3)

(4)

28-2-2009

3, फरवरी 2009

इन भारतीय संसोधनों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली- 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथ्था शिरुकनन्तात्पुरुम में विक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: ईटी 01 /टी-49] प्रकाश बचानी , वैज्ञा. - ई एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी विभाग ) 1849 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 31st March , 2009

S.O. 990.-In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule (1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that amendment to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued :

SCHEDULE

No. & Year ofthe Indian Standards

SI.No.

Date from which the Amendments shall have efefct

No. & Year of the

Amendments

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

28-2-2009

3, February2009

IS 12360 : 1988 Voltage bands for electrical installations including preferred voltages and frequency

Copy of these Amendments are available with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: ET01 /T -49]

PRAKASH BACHANI , Sc - E & Head (Electrotechnical Department)

नई दिल्ली , 1 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 991.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( कों) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं: -

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि क्रम सं. संशोधित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

30-3-2009

संशोधन संख्या 6

जुलाई 2008

आई एस 1239 ( भाग 2 ) : 1992 मृद इस्पात के पाइप नलिकाकार और पिटवां इस्पात की अन्य फिटिंगें भाग 2 मृदु इस्पात साकेट नलिकाकार तथा पिटवां इस्पात की अन्य पाइप फिटिंगें- विशिष्टि (चौथा पुनरीक्षण )

इन भारतीय संशोधनों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: एमटीडी 19/टी-31 ]

डा ( श्रीमति ) स्नेह भाटला , वैज्ञा. एफ एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी )

New Delhi , the 1st April , 2009

S.O. 991. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub- rule ( 1 ) ofRule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each

1330Gi/09-15 1850

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

SCHEDULE

SI.No. No. &Year ofthe Indian Standard(s)

No. & Year of the

Amendments

Amendment (s)

Date from which the Amendment shall have effect (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Amendment No.6

30-3-2009

July2008

IS 1239 (Part 2) : 1992 Specification for Steel tubes, tubulars and other wrought steel fittings Part 2 Mild steel sockets tubular and other wrought steel pipe fittings (fourth revision)

Copy of this Standard is available for sales with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: MTD 19/T-31 ]

Dr. (Mrs.) SNEH BHATLA , Scientist ' F' & Head(Met Engg .)

नई दिल्ली , 2 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 992.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उप नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में एतद्वारा अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे रद्द कर दिए गए हैं और वापस ले लिये गये है :

अनुसूची

क्रम सं. रद्द किये गये मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

टिप्पणी

भास्त के राजपत्र भाग 2 , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) में का. आ. संख्या और तिथि प्रकाशित

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

का.आ. संख्या 1142

तिथि12-4-2003

आई एस 15255 : 2002/आई एस ओ 10044: 1995 बैंकिंग एवं सम्बद्ध वित्तीय सेवाएं- सूचना अन्तर्विनियम - प्रलेखी ऋण फार्म

का.आ. संख्या 2131

तिथि3-9-2003

आई एस 14805 ( भाग 1 ): 2000/ आई एस ओ 7982-1 : 1998 बैंक दूरसंचार - निधि अन्तरण संदेश भाग 1 निधि अन्तरण संदेशों के लिए शब्दाली और आंकडा सेगमेंट व आंकडा घटकों का सार्विक सेट

का.आ. संख्या 3483

तिथि25-8-2009

आई एस 15639:2006 आई एस ओ 10043 :1994 बैंकिंग एवं संबंधित वित्तीय सेवाएं- सूचना विनियम- संग्रह हेतु प्रेषणादेश पत्र

[ संदर्भः एम एस डी/जी-8 अधिसूचना ]

अक्षय कुमार शर्मा, वैज्ञा. ई एवं प्रमुख ( प्रबंध एवं तंत्र ) 1851

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

NewDelhi , the 2nd April , 2009

S.O. 992. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub- rule (1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, it is , hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are mentioned in the Schedule give hereafter, have been cancelled and stand withdrawn :

SCHEDULE

Remarks

Sl . No. No. and Year of the Indian Standards withdrawn

S.O. No. and date published in the Gazette ofIndia Part II , Section 3 , sub-section (ii )

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

1 .

S.O. No.1142

dated 12-4-2003

IS 15255 : 2002/ISO 10044 : 1995 Banking and related financial services- Information interchange -Documenatry creditform

S.O. No.2131

dated 30-9-2000

IS 14805 : (Part 1 ) : 2000/ISO 7982-1 : 1998 Bank telecommunication- Funds transfer messages: Part 1 Vocabulary and universal set of data segments and data elements for electronic funds transfer messages

S.O. No.3483

dated 25-8-2006

IS 15639 : 2006/ISO 10043 : 1944 Banking and related financial services- Information interchange- Collection Orderform

[Ref: MSD/G-8 Notification ] A.K. SHARMA , Scientist ' E ' & Head ( MSD )

नई दिल्ली , 6 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 993.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम ( 5 ) के उपविनियम ( 6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तारीख से रद्द/स्थगित कर दिया गया है :-

अनुसूची

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम और पता

समाप्त करने कीतिथि

लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/ प्रक्रम संबद्ध भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

क्रम सं.

लाइसेंस सं. -सीएम/एल

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

7-1-2009 7115254

कवर्ड इलैक्ट्रोड फार मैनुयल मैटल आर्क, वैलडिंग आफ कार्बन तथा कार्बन मैंगेनीज स्टील ,

आई एस 814: 1991

मैसर्स राजरत्ना इलैक्ट्रोड प्रा. लि. , ब्लाक नंबर 69/1 तथा 70 , गांव बिलेशवारपुरा , अहमदाबाद मेहसाना हाइवे , ता कलोल , गांधीनगर-382 721 1852

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009 /CHAITRA 28 , 1931

(1) (2)

(3)

7357682 मैसर्स रूबी पम्प इंडस्ट्रीज , 5 , कृष्णा गोपाल एस्टेट , नरोडा रोड , फोर्ज तथा ब्लायर कंपाउंड , अहमदाबाद

7514470 मैसर्स शार्प इंजीनियर 552, ए रोड, क्रास रोड 12, जी आई डी सी, काठवाडा, अहमदाबाद 382430

7543275 मैसर्स मार्शल केबल, 58 ए, उदय इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , ओढव पुलिस स्टेशन के सामने , जी आई डी सी , ओढव , अहमदाबाद

7571179 मैसर्स यूनाईटेड फासफोरस लिमिटेड सी-1/29 , जी आई डी सी, इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, कलोल ( उत्तर गुजरात )

7622776 डिलाईट केबल प्रा. लि. पार्थ 2 , कस्तूरबा नगर, नूतन स्कूल के पास , सामा , बडोदरा 390 008

7622877 डिलाईट केबल प्रा. लि. पार्थ 2 , कस्तूरबा नगर, नूतन स्कूल के पास , सामा , बडोदरा 390 008

7747291 डिलाईट केबल प्रा. लि. पार्थ 2 , कस्तूरबा नगर, नूतन स्कूल के पास , सामा, बडोदरा 390 008

7782495 सहजानंद इंडस्ट्रीज , 32 , यमुना एस्टेट, जामफलवाडी रोड , सी टी एम , मिल के पीछे, रेवाभाई एस्टेट रोड , अमराईवाडी अहमदाबाद 380 026

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] (4)

(5)

20-1-2009 सबमर्सिबल पम्पसैट आई एस 8034:2002

20-1-2009 सिंगल स्पीड थ्री फेस इंडक्शन मोटर्स फार ड्राइविंग लिफ्ट आई एस 8151 : 1976

21-1-2009 पी वी इंसूलेटिड केबल आई एस 694:1990

6-1-2009 पैस्टिसाइड फोरेट जी एनकैपसुलेटिड आई एस 9359: 1995

25-1-2009 पी वी इंसूलेटिड केबल आई एस 694: 1990

16-1-2009 पी वी इंसूलेटिड ( एच डी ) केबल आई एस 1554 ( पार्ट 1 ) : 1988

16-1-2009 एरियल बंचड केबल आई एस 14255:1995

12-1-2009 ओपनवैल सबमर्सिबल पम्पसैट आई एस 14220: 1994

[सं. सी.एम.डी./ 13 : 13 ]

पी. के. गंभीर, उपमहानिदेशक ( मुहर )

New Delhi , the 6th April , 2009

S.O. 993.- in pursuance of sub - regulation ( 6 ) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification ) Regulations , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which are given below have been cancelled/ suspended with effect from the date indicated against each:

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

Name and Address of the licensee

Licence No. CM/L

SL. No.

(3)

(1)

(2)

7115254

1..

M/sRajratna Electrodes Pvt.Ltd. Block No.69/ 1 & 70, Village Bileshwarpura, Ahmedabad Mehsana Highway, Tal . Kalol Gandhinagar 382 721

7357682

M/ s Ruby Pump Industries 5, Krishna Gopal Estate , Naroda Road, Forge and Blower Compound , Ahmedabad

7514470

M/sSharp Engineers 552, A Road, Cross Road 12 , GIDC Kathwada, Ahmedabad 382 430

7543275 M/sMarshal Cables 58 / A, Uday Industrial Estate, Opposite Odhav Police Station , GIDC Odhav , Ahmedabad

7571179

1853

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009 /चैत्र 28 , 1931

SCHEDULE

Date of Cancellation Article/Process with relevant Indian Standards covered by the licence expired

(5) (4)

7-1-2009 Covered Electrodes for Manual Metal Arc Welding of Carbon and Carbon Manganese Steel

IS814: 1991

20-1-2009 Submersible Pumpsets IS8034: 2002

20-1-2009 Single Speed three phase induction motors for driving lifts 1S8151: 1976

21-1-2009 PVC Insulated Cables IS 694: 1990

6-1-2009 Pesticide-phorate G encapsulated

IS9359: 1995

M/ sUnited Phosphorus Ltd. C- 1 /29 , GIDC Industrial Estate , Kalol (N.G.) Gujarat

7622776

Delite Cables Pvt . Ltd. Parth2, Kasturbanagar , Near Nutan School , Sama, Vadodara 390 008 7622877

Delite Cables Pvt . Ltd. Parth 2, Kasturbanagar, Near Nutan School , Sama, Vadodara 390 008

7747291 Delite Cables Pvt . Ltd. Parth 2, Kasturbanagar , Near Nutan School , Sama,

Vadodara 390 008

9. 7782495 Sahajanand Industries, 32, Yamuna Estate , Jamfalwadi Road, Behind CTM Mills , Revabhai Estate Road , Amraiwadi , Ahmedabad 380 026

25-1-2009 PVC Insulated Cables IS694:1990

16-1-2009 PVC Insulated (HD) Cables IS 1554 (Part I) : 1988

16-1-2009 Aerial Bunched Cables IS 14255: 1995

12-1-2009 Openwell Submersible Pumpsets IS 14220: 1994

[No. CMD/ 13 : 13 ] P. K. GAMBHIR , Dy, Director General (Marks) 1854

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/ CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii )]

नई दिल्ली , 6 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 994.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 5 के उप विनियम ( 6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि वे लाइसेंस जिनके विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं उनके आगे दर्शाए गई तिथि से समाप्त हो गए हैं :

अनुसूची

लाईसेन्सधारी का नाम और पता

क्रम सं.

लाईसेन्स सं

लाईसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/प्रक्रम संबद्ध भारतीय मानक सहित

समाप्त होने कीतिथि (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5) 1. 7469693 अक्वाफोर

14543:2004

01-01-2009

500 मिली और । लीटर पेंट बोतल और 20 लीटर पेंट जार

185 आर , अल्हाद , पी .के.रोड कोर्पोरेशन बैंक के ऊपर मुलुण्ड ( पश्चिम) मुंबई400080 महाराष्ट्र

[सं. के.प्र.वि. / 13:13 ]

पी. के. गंभीर , उप महानिदेशक

New Delhi , the 6th April , 2009

S.O. 994.- In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) ofregulation 5 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification ) Regulations, 1988, the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

SI No.

Licence No.

Name and Address of the Jicensee

Dateof Cancellation

Article/Process with relevant Indian Standard covered by the licence cancelled

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5) 1.

7469693

IS14543 :2004

01-01-2009 AquaFour

185 R, Alhad P.K. Road,

500 ML & 1 Litre pet bottles

and 20 litre pet Jars

Above corporation Bank Mulund (W) Mumbai 400080 Maharashtra

[No. CMD/ 13 : 13 ]

P. K. GAMBHIR, Dy. Director General

नई दिल्ली , 6 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 995.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के नियम 4 के उप विनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं, वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

भारतीय मानक का शीर्ष

लाईसेन्सधारी का नाम व पता

अनु. वर्ष क्रम सं

लाईसेन्स सं

भा. मा. भाग संख्या

स्वीकृत करने की तिथि, वर्ष/माह

(1) (2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(8 ) ( 9 )

(6) (7)

29-01-2009 जैनम केबल लिमिटेड

1. 7903481

694

1990

पीवी इंसुलेटिड केबल

शैड नंबर 1 , लाल दरबाजा , उपवाडा पारिया रोड , पी ओ

उपवाडा रेलवे स्टेशन , वलसाद 1855

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(4)

(2) (3)

(1)

2. 7896514 01-01-2009 श्री विनायक ज्वैलर्स , 10,12 शीतल चैम्बर, न्याय मंदिर के सामने , डीसा 385 535 डिस्ट्रिक्ट बनसकांटा 01-01-2009

7896615

शुभ लक्ष्मी जवैलर्स 2, राजमंदिर काम्पलैक्स अनिल शोरूम के सामने ,नरोडा अहमदाबाद 382 330 4.

01-01-2009

7896716

शिक्षापत्री गोल्ड पैलेस 10 ,मीठा को ओप हाउसिंग सोसाइटी, मेहता को ओप हाउसिंग सोसाइटी , ए डीसी बैंक रानिप , अहमदाबाद 383480 06-01-2009

7898922

`गुरूकृपा गोल्ड टैस्टिंग , सेंटर 209 , रिलिफ काम्पलैक्स, व्यापारी जिन , एट तथा पोस्ट कलोल , ता कलोल, गांधी नगर 382721 6.

21-01-2009

7902277

गोल्ड रूफ , 206, चित्राराथ काम्पलैक्स , प्रसिडेंट होटल के पास , आफ सी जी रोड, नवरंगपुरा, अहमदाबाद

16-01-2009

7900778

पालको मैटल लिमिटेड खानवाडी के सामने, श्रामोल रोड , अहमदाबाद 29-01-2009

8. 7903582

परमेश्वर स्टील प्रा लिमिटेड 220/ई , जी वी एम एम , डिलक्स होटल के पास , ओढव , अहमदाबाद 27-01-2009

9. 7902984

चंदन केबल , 12-13-14, लीलाभाई एस्टेट मातृ छाया विद्यालय के पास, राबरी कालोनी , अहमदाबाद 29-01-2009

10. 7903683

स्वास्तिक जवैलर्स , 15,16,17 , राजहंस प्वाईंट वराछा रोड, सूरत 13-01-2009

11. 7899621

हैलीप्लास्ट इंडस्ट्रीज 17 , निर्माणइंडस्ट्रियल सटेट , फुलपाडा, ए क रोड, शमशान गृह के सामने , सूरत (5)

(8 ) ( 9 )

(6) (7)

1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं 1417 के आभूषणों, शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं 1417 1999 के आभूषणों, शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं 1417 1999 के आभूषणों , शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं 1417 के आभूषणों, शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन 1999

1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं 1417 के आभूषणों , शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

1554 भाग 1 1988 पीवी इंसूलेटिड (एच डी) केबल

2062 2006 स्टील फार जनरल सटकचरल परपस

1554 भाग 1 1988 पी वी इंसूलेटिड (एच डी) केबल

चांदी तथा चांदी मिश्र धातुओं 2112 के आभूषणों, शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन 2003

7098 भाग । 1988 कास लिंकड पालिथैलिन इंसूलेटिड पी वी सी शीथड केबल 1856

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/ CHAITRA 28 , 1931

(2) (3)

( 1)

(4)

12. 7901378 28-01-2009 मैक्सवैल टैक्नोरेटस , एल-75 , जी आई डीसी , वाटर टैंक के पीछे , ओढव , अहमदाबाद

13. 7900374 13-01-2009 बैस्टबिवरेज , सर्वे नंबर 17 , प्लाट नंबर ई , केयर आफ लिली रिसोर्ट बारेला , टालव , अंबाजी हाइवे , साबरकांटा

14. 7900980 16-01-2009 श्री हरि बिवरेज 290/1 नागरबापा एस्टेट तालव गोटा के पास , अहमदाबाद

15. 7901780 20-01-2009 देवल बिवरेज , प्लाट नंबर बी 15 , शंकरभाई पटेल इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , सावली रोड, मंजूसर, बडोदा 21-01-2009

16. 7902883

भलाला बिवरेज 240 , नेहरूनगर , श्रीधर पेट्रोल पंप के पीछे , लाम्बे हनुमान रोड , सूरत

17. 7903279 28-01-2009 रिलायंस इंडस्ट्रिज लिमिटेड रैलपाईप प्लांट , गांव मोरा , पी. ओ. भाथा , सूरत हजीरा रोड, सूरत

18.

26-11-2008

7889719

मोनी पंप प्रा. लि. , 33 , सूर्योदय एस्टेट, टाटा गोडाउन के पास , चामुंडा ब्रिज के पास , असारवा , अहमदाबाद

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] (5)

(6) ( 7) ( 8 ) ( 9 )

14220

1994 ओपनवैल सबमर्सिवल पम्पसैट

पैकेजबंद पेयजल

14543

2004

14543

पैकेजबंद पेयजल

2004

14543

पैकेजबंद पेयजल

14543

2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल

14885

2001 पैकेजबंद. पेयजल

14220

1994 ओपन वैल सबमर्सिबल पम्पसैट

[सं. सी एम डी / 13:11 ]

पी. के. गंभीर, उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर )

New Delhi , the 6th April , 2009

S.O. 995. In pursuance of sub- regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards

(Certification) Regulations , 1988 , ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule:

SCHEDULE Grant Date

Sec Year

IS No. Part

Title of the Standard

Name & Address of the party

Sl . No.

Licences No.

(3)

(4)

( 1 ) (2)

29-01-2009

1. 7903481

Zenium Cables Ltd Shed No 1 , Lal Darwaja , Udwada-Paria Road, P.O. Udwada Railway Station, Valsad (5)

( 8) ( 9)

(6) (7)

PVC Insulated Cables 694

1990 1857

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

01-01-2009

7896514

Shree Vinayak Jewellers 10, 12, Shital Chambers , Opp NyayMandir, Deesa- 385535 Dist: Banaskantha 01-01-2009

7896615

Shubhlaxmi Jewllers 2, Rammandir Complex, Opp Anil Showroom , Naroda, Ahmedabad- 382330 01-01-2009

7896716

Shikshapatri Gold Palace 10, Mehta Co. Op . Housing Society, Opp A.D.C. Bank, Ranip, Ahmedabad-383480

06-01-2009

7898922

Gurukrupa Gold Testing Center 209, Relife Complex, Vepari Jin, At & Post : Kalol Tal: Kalol, DistGandhinagar - 382721 21-01-2009

7902277

GoldRoof 206, Chitrarath Complex, Near President Hotel, OffC.G. Road, Navrangpura , Ahmedabad 16-01-2009

7900778

Palco Metals Limited Opp Khanwadi , Ramol Road Ahmedabad

Parmeshwar Steels Pvt Ltd 29-01-2009

7903582

220/E , G.V.M.M. , Near Delux Hotel , Odhav Ahmedabad .

27-01-2009

9. 7902984

Chandan Cables 12-13-14 , Lilabhai Estate, Near Matru Chhaya Vidyalay Rabari Colony, Ahmedabad

29-1-2009

7903683

10.

Swastik Jewellers 15,16,17 , Rajhans Point, Varachha Road , Varachha , Surat 13-1-2009

7899621

11.

Helly Plast Industries 17, Nirman Indl . Estate, Fulpada, A. K. Road, Opp. Samshan Gruh Surát 28-1-2009

7903178

12.

Maxwell Technocrates L- 75 , GIDC , B /H Water Tank Odhav , Ahmedabad 13-1-2009

13. 7900374

Best Beverages Survey No. 17 Plot No.E, C/o Lily Resort , Barela Talav, Ambaji Highway Sabarkantha

1330 GI/09-16

(6 (7) (8) (9) (5)

1999

1417

Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts-- Fineness and Marking

1999

1417

Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking

1999

1417

Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking

1417 1999 Gold and GoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking

1999

1417

Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking

1988

1554

PVC Insulated HD Cables

2006

2062

Steel for General Structural Purposes

.1988

1554 i

PVC Insulated HD Cables

2112 2003 Silverand Silver Alloys Jewellery/Artifacts-

1988

7098

Crosslinked Polyethylene insulated PVC sheathed cables Part I

1999

14220

Openwell Submersible Pumpsets

1999 Packaged Drinking Water, 14543 (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) 1858

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/ CHAITRA 28 , 1931

(1) (2) (3)

(4)

14. 7900980 16-1-2009

Shree Hari Beverages 290/1 Nagarbapa Estate ,NR Talav Gota , Ahmedabad 15. 7901780 20-1-2009

Deval Beverages Plot No. B - 15 Shankarbhai Patel Industrial Estate Savli Road Manjusar Baroda

21-1-2009

16. 7902883

Bhalala Beverages 240, Nehrunagar , Behind Shreedhar Petrol Pump Lambe Hanuman Road , Surat

17. 7903279 28-01-2009

Reliance Industries Ltd Relpipe Plant, Village: Mora, PO. Bhatha, Surat-Hazira Road, Surat 26-11-2008

-18. 7889719

Mony Pumps Pvt Ltd 33, Suryoday Estate, NearTataGodown, NearChamundaBridge, Asarwa , Ahmedabad

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii )] (5)

(6) (7) (8) ( 9 )

1999 Packaged Drinking Water , 14543 (other) than Packaged Natural Mineral Water

Packaged Drinking Water, 14543 1999 (other) than Packaged Natural Mineral Water

Packaged Drinking Water , 14543 2004 (other) than Packaged Natural Mineral Water

2001

14885

Polyethylene Pipes for the Supply of Gaseous Fuels

1994

14220

Openwell Submersible Pumpsets

[No. CMD/ 13: 11 ] P. K. GAMBHIR , Dy. Director General(Marks )

नई दिल्ली, 6 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 996.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के नियम 5 के उप विनियम ( 6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिनके विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए है , को लाइसेंस प्रदान किए गए हैं : -

अनुसूची क्रम सं

लाईसेन्स सं.

लाईसेंस मंजूरी कीतिथि

पार्टी का नाम व पता (कारखाना) (2)

(3)

(4)

(1)

03-02-2009

1. 7899015

साई प्रसाद फूडस लि.

क्रम सं. 8 भाग 1 से पाले (शा. ) पोस्ट- कोलवाडी , पनवेल जिला - रायगढ़ 410206

06-02-2009 अष्ट विनायक बेवरेजेज 7901881

प्लाट सं. 10 , सेक्टर 6 , खान्दाकालोनी , नवीन पनवेल (पश्चिम) जिला-रायगढ़ 410206

उत्पाद

आई.एस. सं. /भाग/खण्ड वर्ष

(6)

(5)

भामा 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

भामा 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) 1859

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 ,1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(4) (2) (3)

(1)

05-02-2009

7902378

दादा बाबा मॉली मिनरल वाटर कंपनी प्लॉट सं. 13 , सेक्टर 6 , सानपाडा ( पूर्व) नवीं मुंबई , जिला थाणे

05-02-2009

4. 7905889

वीनस सेफ्टी एण्ड हेल्थ प्रा.लि. पी. बी. नं. 15 प्लॉट र्स.डब्ल्यू-284 एम आईडीसी , रबाले नवीं मुंबई , जिला- थाणे-400701

15-02-2009

7907287

के.जे. अक्वा हाउस सं. 21 , सी. टी.एस.सं. 19/जी, पवार कंपाउण्ड, विलेज परजापुर , एमआईडीसी सिप्ज कंपनी के पीछे, अंधेरी ( पूर्व ) मुंबई-400093

17-02-2009

6 7909291

अशोक केमिकल वर्क्स ई- 61 और 62 , एमआईडीसी अवधान , धुले 424001

(6)

(5)

भामा 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

भामा 15323 : 2003 श्वसन संरक्षा उपस्कर में इस्तेमाल गैस फिल्टर और संयुक्तफिल्टर

भामा 14543 : 2004 पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

भामा 712 : 1984 भवन चूना

[सं. के. प्रे. वि. / 13 : 11 ]

पी. के. गंभीर , उप महानिदेशक

New Delhi , the 6th April, 2009

S.O. 996.-In pursuance of sub- regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule:

Grant Date

Licences No.

Sl . No.

Name & Address (factory) of the party

(4)

(3)

(1) (2)

03-02-2009

7899015

Sai Prasad Foods Limited S.No. 8 , Part1 to 4 , Plate (Br.) Post- Kolwadi ,Panvel DistRaigad410206

06-02-2009

7901881

Ashtvinayak Beverages PlotNo. 10, Sector 6, Khanda Colony, New Panvel(West) DistRaigad 410206

05-02-2009

7902378

Dada Baba Mauli Mineral Water Co , Plot No. 13 , Sector 6, Sanpada (E) NaviMumbai Dist Thane

SCHEDULE

IS No./Part/Sec Product

Year

(6)

(5)

14543:2004 Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

14543:2004 PackagedDrinking Water (other than packagedNatural Mineral Water ) 1860

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

(1) (2)

(3)

(4) 4. 7905889 05-02-2009 Venus Safety & Health

PvtLtd R.B. No. 15 , Plot No.W-284 MIDC, Rabale Navi Mumbai DistThane 400701 7907287 15-02-2009

K.J. Aqua House No. 21 , C.T.S. No. 19/G, PawarCompound, Village Parjapur , Midc , Behind SeepzCompany, Andheri (E) Mumbai 400093 6. 7909291-17-02-2009

Ashoka Chemical Works E-61 &62, Midc Awadhan Dhule424001

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) ] (5)

(6)

15323: 2003 Gas filters and Combined Filters Used in Respiratory Protective Equipment

14543: 2004 Packaged Drinking Water (other than PackagedNatural Mineral Water)

712: 1984

Building limes

[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ] P. K. GAMBHIR, Dy. Director General

नई दिल्ली, 8 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 997. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वह स्थापित हो गया है : - क्रम सं. संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

(1)

(2)

1 आई एस 15851: 2009 वस्त्रादि- सूती , मानव निर्मित रेशों व तन्तुओं एवं उनके मिश्रणं से बनी साड़ियाँ - विशिष्टि

अब यह भारतीय मानक बिक्री के लिये उपलब्ध होगा ।

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों , यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

(3)

(4)

जनवरी 2009 आई एस 11814 :1986 आई एस 13355 : 1992

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो के मुख्यालय मानक भवन, 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002 और इसके क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर , नागपुर पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं । भोषाल, भुवनेश्वर,

[संदर्भ : टीएक्सडी/जी-25 ] पी. भटनागर , वैज्ञानिक ' ई ' एवं प्रमुख ( टीएक्सडी )

NewDelhi, the 8th April, 2009

S.O. 997. In pursuance of clause ( b) of sub-rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , heroby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been sumblished on the date indicated against it:

1861

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Sl.No. No. & Year ofthe Indian Standards Established

(2)

(1)

SCHEDULE

Date of Established No. & Year of Indian Standards , if any, Supersededby the New Indian Standard

(4)

(3)

IS 11814: 1986

January 2009

IS 13355 : 1992

IS 15851 : 2009 Textiles SarisMade of Cotton , Man- Made Fibres/Filaments and theirBlends -Specification Henceforth, this standard will be available for sale .

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with H.Q. at Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and its Regional Offices at : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices at Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: TXD/G -25 ] P. BHATNAGAR, Sc . ' E ' & Head (Textiles)

नई दिल्ली , 9 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 998.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप नियम ( 1 ) के खंड (ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये हैं वे स्थापित हो गए है: -

स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या क्रम सं.

वर्ष और शीर्षक

(2)

(1 )

1 आई एस 16 ( भाग 1 ) : 2008 शल्कलाख - विशिष्टि

भाग 1 हाथ का बना शल्क लाख (चौथा पुनरीक्षण)

2 आई एस 16 ( भाग 2 ) : 2008 शल्क लाख - विशिष्टि भाग 2 मशीन से बना शल्क लाख ( चौथा पुनरीक्षण) अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

31अक्तूबर 2008

31अक्तूबर 2008 इन भारतीय मानकों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , मुवाहाटी, हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : सीएचडी 23 / आई एस 16 ( भाग 1 और भाग 2 ) ]

ई. देवेन्द्र, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' निदेशक ( रसायन )

New Delhi , the 9th April, 2009

S.O. 998. In pursuance ofclause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the Indian Standards particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

Sl . No. No.& Year of the Indian Standard Established

(2)

(1)

1. IS 16 (Part 1 ) : 2008

Shellac -Specification Part 1Hand -Made Shellac (FourthRevision)

SCHEDULE

No. & Year of Indian

Date of Established Standards , if any superseded by the New Indian Standard

(3)

(4)

31October 2008 1862

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

(1)

(2)

2. IS 16(Part2): 2008 Shellac-Specification Part 1Machine- Made Shellac (Fourth Revision)

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (3)

(4)

31 October 2008

Copy ofthese Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: CHD23/IS 16 (Part 1 &2) ] E. DEVENDAR, Sc . ' F ' , Director ( Chemical )

नई दिल्ली, 9 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 999. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे 11 नवम्बर 2008 से रद्द कर दिए गए हैं और वापस ले लिये गये है:-

रद्द किये गये मानक की संख्या और वर्ष क्रम सं.

(2)

(1)

1 आई एस 3972 : 1968 कांच इनेमल माण्ड के। परीक्षण की पद्धतियां अनुसूची

टिप्पणी

भारत के राजपत्र भाग 2 , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) में का.अ. संख्या और तिथिप्रकाशित

(3)

(4)

यह मानक दोहराया जा चुका है और कई भागों और अनुभागों में बांट दिया गया है।

[संदर्भ: सीएचडी 9/ आई एस 3972 ] ई. देवेन्द्र, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' , निदेशक ( रसायन )

New Delhi , the 9th April , 2009

S.O. 999. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub- rule ( 1 ) ofRule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , it is hereby notified that the Indian Standards, particulars of which are mentioned in the Schedule give hereafter , have been cancelled and stand withdrawn w.e.f. 11 November 2008:-

Sl . No. No. & Year of the Indian Standards cancelled

(2)

(1)

IS 3972 : 1968 Methods of test for vitreous enamelware

SCHEDULE

Remarks

S.O.No. & Date published in the Gazette of India, Part - II , Section -3 , Sub -section ( ii )

(4)

(3)

The standard has been revised and split in various parts and sections .

[Ref: CHD 9/IS-3972 ] E. DEVENDAR, Sc . ' F ' , Director ( Chemical ) 1863 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 2009 (चैत्र 28 , 28, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 2 अप्रैल , 2009

का. आ. 1000.- भारत सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि महाराष्ट्र राज्य के तहसील रोहा , जिला रायगड में स्थित नागोथाने मैन्युफैक्चरींग युनिट को उरन से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए मैसर्स रिलायंस इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड , द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और भारत सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि, उस भूमि में , जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , भारत सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्व है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकारक्ने अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री डी. एन. तरे ,सक्षम प्राधिकारी ,रिलायंस इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड , नागोथाने मैन्युफैक्चरींग युनिट , नागोथाने तहसील रोहा , जिला- रायगड, महाराष्ट्र राज्य को लिखितरूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा।

अनुसूची

जिलाः रायगड

तहसीलः उरण

राज्यः महाराष्ट्र

आर.ओ. यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेत्रफल गोव कानाम

सर्वे नं./गट नं.

हेक्टेयर एयर सी .एयर

5 1

48 84/5 (P)

( 1 ) नार्गाव

68 84/3 (P)

84 / 1A (P) , 84 / 1B ( P)

35 76 / A / 3 ( P) , 76 / A / 3 / B ( P)

48 90 74 (P)

7.0

75/1 (P)

87 75/2 (F )

0 05

खाड़ी

23 38 मुंबई पोर्ट ट्रस्ट

65/1 से 5 (P)

64 / 1A ( P) , 64 / 1B (P) 1864

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

(1)

(2) ( 2) चाणजे 408 (P)

22A / 1 / 1 ( P)

20 (P)

19 (P)

18/2(P)

15/2 ( P)

15/1 ( P)

22A / 1 / 2 ( P)

खाड़ी

तहसील: अलिबाग

[Part II Sec .3(ii ) | (3) (4) (5) 0

89 2

10 0

11 0

64 0

58 0

14 00 0

44 08

02 1

17 7 49 68

जिला. रामगड

2 ( 1 ) रांजणखार 39/32 (P)

डावली 57/1 ( P)

56/3 ( P)

56/2 ( P)

56/6 (P)

56/1 ( P)

56/5 (P)

56/4 (P)

55/1 ( P)

55/7/1 ( P) , 55/7/2 ( P)

55/6 (P)

55/5 ( P)

55/12 (P)

55/11 ( P)

55/4 ( P)

55/3 ( P)

55/10 ( P)

55/14(P)

55/9 (P)

55/13 (P)

54/4 (P)

54/3 (P)

54/8 (P)

54/12 ( P)

राज्यः महाराष्ट्र

5 0

94 70 0

37 08

06 96 0

12 04

19 42

71 0

50 0

79 0

99 0

02 37 0

10 31 0

14 93 0

00 01 0

02 05 00

89 0

05 0

88 0

13 0

93 0

00 90 .

38 0

09 06

81 0

17 1865

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28, 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2 1

54/5(P)

54/9 ( P)

54/13 (P)

54/15 (P)

54/18 ( P)

54/19 (P)

54/20 (P)

54/21 (P)

54/22 (P)

54/1 (P)

49 (P)

28 (P)

27 (P)

537 / 1A (P) , 537/1 B (P) (2 ) मिलकतखार

585 (P)

4 ( P)

3 (P)

2 ( P)

1/2 ( P)

11 (P)

12 (P)

13 (P)

14( P)

35(P)

36(P)

34 (P)

17 (P)

16 ( P)

33 (P)

19 (P)

18 (P)

550 ( P)

549 (P)

542(P)

541 (P)

540 ( P)

1330 GI/09-17

5 02 27 0

14 0

24 11

99 06

06 47 0

06 16

-0

39 04

48 01

51 11

73 01

92 80

10 00

25 87 0

25 68

03 03

03 94. 0

81 05

19 31

16 04

00 40 0

9.1

06 60 0

22 57 0

03 51 0

00. 02 0

04 60 0

06 65 0

32 54 0 1866

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : A RIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28, 1931

539 (P)

(2) मिलकतरवार (जारी...)

538 (P)

537/2( P)

524 ( P)

(3)कोप्रोली 206(P)

205 (P)

202(P)

203 (P)

204 ( P)

201 (P)

200 ( P)

193 (P)

194 (P)

189 (P)

188 ( P)

186 (P)

185 ( P)

184(P)

170 ( P)

171(P)

174(P)

(4) मांडवे तर्फे 6/1 (P)

झिराड 6/3(P)

7/3 (P)

7/4(P)

11/3 (P)

11 / 2 / A / 1 ( P) , 11 / 2 / A/ 2 ( P), 11 / 2 / B (P)

10 ( P)

9 / 1 / A/ 2 (P)

9 / 1 / A/ 1 (P)

11/1 ( P)

12/1 से 8 (P)

(5) धोकवडे 266(P)

268 (P)

253 (P)

267/1 ( P) , 267/2 ( P)

270 (P)

(Part II Sec. 3 ( ii )] 4

5 0

33 88 24

50 3

30 0

05 97 0 00 23 0 0.4 91

0 05 21

0 06 61

30 02

96 0

55 0

12 02

00 28 10

53 0

38 12

72 02

0 03 49 0 03 27 0 20 03

32 0

79 06

57 00

87 40 37 0

0 08 74 12

07 0

70 04

17 06

66 0

39 0

25 85 0

05 48

97 0

64 00

0 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

1867 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

Y (5) चाकवड

0 06 98 252(P)

00 04 271 ( P)

रास्ता

0 05 40

77 251 (P)

रास्ता

0 00 05 271 (P)

02 10

243 (P)

244 / 1 / A / 1 ( P) , 244 / 1 / A / 2 ( P) , 244/2

19 77

(P)

03 67

245(P)

10 03

246/1 ( P ) , 246/2 ( P)

6.0 00

खाड़ी

[फा. सं..एल 14014/25/2007 जी.पी. ।

के.के. शर्मा, अवर सचिव Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas

New Delhi , the 2nd April , 2009

S. O. 1000.-Whereas it appears to Government of India that it is necessary in public interest that for transportation of natural gas from Uran to Nagothane Manufacturing Unit , Nagothane in Tehsil Roha , District- Raigad in State of Maharashtra , pipeline should be laid by M / s Reliance Industries Limited;

And whereas , it appears to Government of India that for the " purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which are described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) ofSection 3 of the Petroleum & Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquire the Right of User therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of the notification aspublished in the Gazette of India under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of Right of User therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri D. N. Tare , Competent Authority , M/ s Reliance Industrie's Limited , Nagothane Manufacturing Unit , Division Nagothane , Tehsil - Roha , District- Raigad , Maharashtra State .

1868

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009 /CHAITRA 28 , 1931

District: -R Tehell: Uren

Survey Sub- division No. Village

2 1

84/5 (P)

1) Nagaon

84/3 (P)

84/ 1A ( P) , 84 / 1B (P)

76 / A/ 3 (P) , 76 / A / 3 / B (P)

74(P)

75/1 (P)

75/2 ( P)

Creek

BPT

65/1 to 5 (P)

64/ 1A ( P), 64 / 1B (P) 2) Chanaje 400 (P)

22A/1 / 1P)

20(P)

19(P)

18/2(P)

15/2(P)

15/1 (P)

22A/ 1 / 2 (P)

Creek

Tehsil : Allbag

Part II Scc.3( ii) |

State: - Maharashtra Area requiredfor ROU Acquisition

Are

C-Are Hect.

5 3

68 0

18 0

35 0

90 0

18 0

11 0

64 0

58 0

00 0

44 0

17 1

State: Maharashtra

District : - Rains

Survey Sub-division No. Village

Qut Ne .

39/32(P)

1) Ranjankhar Dawali

57/1 (P)

56/3(P)

56/2(P)

56/6(P)

56/1 (P)

56/5(P)

56/4(P)

55/1(P)

55/7/1 ( ) , 55/7/2 (P)

55/6 (P)

55/5 (P)

55/12(P)

55/11 (P)

55/4 (P)

55/3 ( P)

55/10(P)

55/14 (P)

55/9(P)

55/13 (P)

Aree required for ROU Acquisition

Are

C-Are Hect.

5 0

70 0

19 0

50 0

79 0

99 0

37 0

93 0

01 0

05 0

89 0

05 0

88 0

13 0

93 0

90 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र.28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

54/4(P)

54/3 (P)

54/8(P)

54/12(P)

54/5(P)

54/9 (P)

54/13 (P)

54/15 (P)

54/18 (P)

54/19 (P)

54/20 (P)

54/21 ( P)

54/22(P)

54/1 (P)

49(P)

28(P)

27 (P)

537/1 A ( P) , 537/1 B ( P) 2)Milkatkhar

585(P)

4(P)

3 ( P)

2( P)

1/2(P)

11 ( P)

12(P)

13(P)

14(P)

35 ( P)

36(P)

34(P)

17 ( P)

16( P)

33 (P)

19(P)

18( P)

550(P)

549(P)

542(P)

541 (P)

540(P)

539(P)

538(P)

537/2 ( P)

524(P)

206(P)

(3) Koproli

205 (P)

202(P)

203 (P)

204( P)

201(P)

200(P)

1869

92 3

03 0

40 0

79 0

65 0

50 0

30 3

97 0

91 0

21 0

59 0 1870

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2000/CHAITRA 28, 1931

193(P)

194(P)

189(P)

188(P)

186(P)

185(P)

184(P)

170(P)

171(P)

174(P)

(4) Mandve Tarfe 6/1(P)

Zirad

6/3(P)

7/3 ( P)

7/4(P)

11/3 (P)

11/ 2 / A/ 1 ( P) , 11 / 2 / A/ 2 ( P) , 11 / 2 /

B(P)

10 ( P)

9/ 1 / A/ 2 ( P)

9/1 / A/ 1 (P)

11/1 (P)

12/1 to 8 (P)

(5) Dhokawade 266(P)

268(P)

253 (P)

267/1 (P) , 267/2 ( P)

270(P)

252(P)

271(P)

Road

251(P)

Road

271 (P)

243 (P)

244/ 1 / A / 1 (P ) , 244 / 1 / A / 2 ( P), 244 /

2.(P)

245(P)

246/1 ( P), 246/2 (P)

Creek

[Part II--Sec. 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 0

55 0

12 0

28 0

53 0

27 0

03 0

32 0

71 0

79 0

57 0

87 0

37 0

74 0

07 0

70 0

17 0

66 0

39 0

85 0

48 0

97 0

64 0

98 0

04 0

40 0

77 0

49 0

05 0

10 0

77 0

67 0

03 6

00 [F. No. L-14014/25/2007-G.P.J K.K.SHARMA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 15 अप्रैल, 2009

का. आ. 1001.- क्योंकि, भारत सरकार ने, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 2 के खण्ड (कं) के अनुसरण में, भारत के राजपत्र में 29.10.2005 को प्रकाशित, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का ० आ० 3962 दिनांक 25.10.2005 तथा भारत के राजपत्र में 26.04.2007 को प्रकाशित अधिसूचना संख्या का० ० 653 (अ) दिनांक 25.04.2007 (जिन्हें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिसूचनाएँ कहा गया है) के द्वारा आन्ध्र प्रदेश सरकार से सेवानिवृत्त श्री के० गंगाचलम, डिप्टी कलक्टर तथा श्री एम० ए ० [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1871

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28, 1931

द्वारा गफ्फार, डिप्टी कलक्टर सहित 09 (नौ) व्यक्तियों को आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य के सभी जिलों में मैसर्स रिलायंस गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड (आर.जी.टी.आई.एल. ) काकीनाडा-हैदराबाद- उरान- अहमदाबाद ट्रंक गैस पाइपलाइन के आन्ध्र प्रदेश में विजयवाड़ा स्थित टैप ऑफ प्वाइंट से पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का पालन करने के लिए नियुक्त किया था;

और, क्योंकि, पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय ने आर.जी.टी.आई.एल. को विजयवाड़ा- नैलौर- चैन्नई तथा काकीनाडा- बासुदेवपुर- हावड़ा गैस पाइपलाइन प्रोजेक्ट को उनकी मैसर्स रिलोजिसटिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड (रिलॉग) , नाम से स्पेशल परपज वैहिकल (एस०पी०वी०) , जिसका रजिस्ट्रीकृत कार्यालय भूतल , 'चित्रकूट' , श्रीराम मिल्स परिसर, गणपत राव कदम मार्ग , वोर्ली , मुम्बई-400013 (महाराष्ट्र) में है, के द्वारा परिचालित करने के लिए स्वीकृति दे दी है;

और, क्योंकि, आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य के सभी जिलों में आर० जी ० टी० आई ० एल ० की पाइपलाइन के 'साथ- साथ मेसर्स 'रिलॉग ' की उक्त पाइपलाइन के लिए भी श्री के ० गंगाचलम तथा श्री एम ० ए ० गफ्फार को सक्षम प्राधिकारी के रूप में प्राधिकृत किया जाना आवश्यक है;

अतः, अब, भारत सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 2 के खण्ड (क) के अनुसरण में , भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की उक्त अधिसूचनाओं में आंशिक संशोधन करते हुए , संलग्न सारिणी के स्तम्भ (1 ) में वर्णित व्यक्तियों को, उक्त सारिणी के स्तम्भ (2 ) में वर्णित क्षेत्र में मैसर्स आर०जी०टी०आई ०एल ० की उक्त पाइपलाइन के साथ- साथ मैसर्स रिलॉग के द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का पालन करने के लिये नियुक्त करती है ।

सारिणी

व्यक्तियों के नाम

अधिकारिता के क्षेत्र

(1)

(2)

आन्ध्र प्रदेश के सभी जिले

1. श्री के० गंगाचलम , डिप्टी कलेक्टर (सेवानिवृत्त)

आन्ध्र प्रदेश के सभी जिले

2. श्री एम ०ए ० गफ्फार, डिप्टी कलेक्टर, सेवानिवृत्त)

[ फा. सं . एल 14014/19/2008 जी.पी. (ⅰ) |

के.के. शर्मा , अवर सचिव 1872

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009CHAFFRA 28, 1931

[Part II-- Sec. 3(ii ))

Neer Dethi, the 15th April , 2000

S. O. 1001.-Whereas in pursuance of clause (a) of Section 2 of Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter called the said Act), Government of India vide Notifications in Ministry of Petroleums and /Natural Gas S.O. No.3962 dated 25.10.2005 published in the Gazette of India on 29.10. 2005 and S.O. No. 653(E) dated 25.04.2007 published in the Gazette of India on 26.04.2007 ( hereinafter called the said Notifications ) authorized 09 (mine ) persons , including Shri K. Gangachalam , Deputy Collector (retd. ) , Government of Andhra Pradesh and Shri M.A. Gaffer, Deputy Collector (retd. ) , Government of Andiwa Pradesh, to perform the functions of Competent Authority for all districts of Andhra Pradesh under the said Act for laying pipelines from the tap off point of Kakinada-Hyderabad-Uran - Ahmedabad Trunk Gas Pipeline in Vijayawada, Andhra Pradeshby M/s Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited (RGTIL);

And, whereas , Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas has allowed RGTIL to implement inter alia Vijaywada Nellore-Chennai & Kakinada-Basudebpur- Howrah gas pipeline projects through its Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), namely , M/ s Rełogistics Infrastructure Limited (' Relog' ), having its Registered Office at Ground Floor, ' Chitrakoot ' , Sciram Mills Premises, Ganpat Rao Kadam Marg, Worli, Mumbai-400 013 (Minharashtra);

And, whereas, it would be expedient to give the charge of Competent Authority for the said pipelines to be laid by M /s Relog to Shri K. Gangachalam and Shri M.A. Gaffar in addition to their charge of Competent Authority for the pipelines of RGTIL in all the districts of Andhra Pradesh:

Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause ( a) of Section 2 of the said Act and in partial modification of the said Notifications of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas . Government of India hereby authorizes the persons mentioned in column ( 1 ) of the Table annexed to perform the functions of the Competent Authority under the said Act for laying the said pipelines by M/s ' Relog in addition to the said pipelines of RGTIL in respect of the areas mentioned in column ( 2 ) of the said Table.

Table

Areas ofjurisdiction

Name and address of persons

(2)

(1)

1. Shri K. Gangachalam Deputy Collector ( Retd. ) All districts of Andhra Pradesh

Alldistricts of Andiıra Pradesh 2. Shri M.A. Gaffar, Deputy Collector (Retd.)

[F. No. L-14014/19/2008-G.P. ( 1 ) ]

K.K.SHARMA , Under Secy.

1873 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 15 अप्रैल, 2009

का. आ. 1002.- क्योंकि, भारत सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 2 के खण्ड (क) के अनुसरण में, भारत के राजपत्र में 26.04.2007 को प्रकाशित, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का० आ० 653(अ) दिनांक 25.04.2007, (जिसे इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिसूचना कहा गया है) के द्वारा आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य की आन्ध्र प्रदेश प्रशासनिक सेवाओं से सेवानिवृत्त श्री के ० नरसिम्हा राव , डिप्टी कलेक्टर, श्री मोहम्मद सिलार, एम. आर. ओ., (विशेष ग्रेड ) और श्री एस० बी० ए ० सितारामराजू, सर्वेक्षण सह आयुक्त को आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य के सभी जिलों में मैसर्स रिलायंस गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड (आर.जी.टी.आई.एल. ) की काकीनाडा- हैदराबाद उरान-अहमदाबाद गैस ट्रंक पाइपलाइन के आन्ध्र प्रदेश में विजयवाड़ा स्थित टैप ऑफ प्वाइन्ट से पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का पालन करने के लिए नियुक्त किया था;

और, क्योंकि, पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय ने आर.जी.टी.आई.एल. को अन्य बातों के साथ-साथ विजयवाड़ा-नैलौर- चैन्नई तथा काकीनाडा- बासुदेवपुर- हावड़ा गैस पाइपलाइन प्रोजेक्ट को उनकी मैसर्स रिलोजिसटिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड (रिलॉग) , नाम से स्पेशल परपज वैहिकल (एस०पी०वी०), जिसका रजिस्ट्रीकृत कार्यालय भूतल, 'चित्रकूट' , श्रीराम मिल्स परिसर, गणपत राव कदम मार्ग , वोर्ली, मुम्बई-400013 (महाराष्ट्र) में है, के द्वारा परिचालित करने के लिए स्वीकृति दे दी है;

अतः, अब , भारत सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 2 के खण्ड (क) के अनुसरण में, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की उक्त अधिसूचना में आंशिक संशोधन करते हुए , संलग्न सारिणी के स्तम्भ (1 ) में वर्णित व्यक्तियों को, उक्त सारिणी के स्तम्भ (2) में वर्णित क्षेत्र में मैसर्स रिलॉग के द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का पालन करने के

सारिणी

लिये नियुक्त करती है ।

अधिकारिता के क्षेत्र

व्यक्तियों के नाम

(2)

(1)

आन्ध्र प्रदेश के सभी जिले

1. श्री के ० नरसिम्हा राव , डिप्टी कलेक्टर (सेवानिवृत्त)

आन्ध्र प्रदेश के सभी जिले

2.श्री मोहम्मद सिलार, एम. आर. ओ. , (विशेष ग्रेड) (सेवानिवृत्त)

आन्ध्र प्रदेश के सभी जिले

श्री एस० बी० ए ० सितारामराजू सर्वेक्षण सह आयुक्त, (सेवानिवृत्त)

[फा. सं. एल-14014/19/ 2008 जी.पी. (ii) | 1330 GI /09-18

के.के. शर्मा , अवर सचिव 1874

[Part II Scc . 3 ( ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

NewDelhi , the 15th April , 2009

S. O. 1002-Whereas in pursuance of clause (a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) (hereinafter called the said Act ), Government of Indía vide Notification in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S.O.No.653 (E) dated 25.04.2007, published in the Gazette of India on 26.04.2007 (hereinafter called the said Notification) authorized Shri K.Narasimha Rao , Deputy Collector (Retd. ) , Government of Andhra Pradesh, Shri Mohammad Silar , MRO (Special Grade) (Retd.), Government of Andhra Pradesh and Shri S.B.A. Sitaramaraju , Assistant Survey Commissioner (Retd. ), Government of Andhra Pradesh to perform the functions of Competent Authority for all the districts of Andhra Pradesh under the said Act for laying pipelines from the Tap Off Point at Vijayawada in Andhra Pradesh of the Kakinada- Hyderabad - Uran -Ahmedabad Trunk Gas Pipeline by M/s Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited (RGTIL);

And, whereas , Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas has allowed RGTIL to implement inter alia Vijaywada- Nellore-Chennai & Kakinada-Basudebpur- Howrah gas pipeline projects through its Special Purpose Vehicle ( SPV) , namely, M/ s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited (' Relog ' ) , having its Registered Office at Ground Floor, ' Chitrakoot ' , Sriram Mills Premises , Ganpat Rao Kadam Marg, Worli, Mumbai -400 013 (Maharashtra) ;

Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause ( a) of Section 2 of the said Act and in partial modification of the said Notification of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India hereby authorizes the persons mentioned in column ( 1 ) of the Table annexed to perform the functions of the Competent Authority under the said Act for laying the said pipelines by M/s ' Relog' in respect of the areas mentioned in column (2) of the said Table.

Table

Name and address of persons

Areas of jurisdiction (2)

(1)

1. Shri K. Narasimha Rao , Deputy Collector (Retd. )

All districts of Andhra Pradesh 2. Shri Mohammad Silar , MRO ( Special Grade ) ( Retd. )

All districts of Andhra Pradesh

All districts of Andhra Pradesh 3. Shri S.B.A. Sitaramaraju , Asstt . Survey Commissioner (Retd.)

[F. No. L -14014/19/2008-G.P. (ii) ]

K.K.SHARMA , Under Secy .

1875

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड3 (ii) ]

नईदिल्ली, 16 अप्रैल, 2009

का. आ. 1003.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग कै अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड (क) के अनुसरण में, तारीख 30, जुलाई , 2005 को भारत के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 2660 तारीख 26 , जुलाई, 2005 में निम्नलिखित रुप से संशोधन करती है, अर्थातः

उक्त अधिसूचना की अनुसूची के, स्तम्भ 1 में , " श्री योगेश कुमार श्रीवास्तव " के स्थान पर " श्री भीम सिंह" शब्द रखे जाऐंगे ।

[फा. सं. आर-25011/8/2009 ओ.आर. [ ]

बी. के. दत्ता , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 16th April , 2009

S. O. 1003. In pursuance of clause ( a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 2660 dated 26th July, 2005 , published in the gazette of India on the 30th , July 2005 namely: -

In the said notification, in the Schedule, in column 1 , for the words " Shri Yogesh Kumar Shrivastava" , the words " Shri Bhim Singh " shall be substituted.

[F. No. R-25011/8/2009-0.R. - 1 ] B. K. DATTA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 16 अप्रैल, 2009

का. आ. 1004.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा (गुजरात) से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुएं , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री एफ. ए. बाबी. सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुन्द्रा - दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड एच.पी.सी.एल. कंडला टर्मिनल -2, बंग्लोझ -1 , खारी रोहर, गांधीधाम -370-240 , कछ, (गुजरात) , को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 1876

Part II-Sec. 3 ( )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 16 , 200MCHAFFRA 28, 1931

तालुका:

सं.

930

1 भवाऊ

901

67 2 लखपत्त

649

69 3 अधोई

614

600

802

[फा. सं. आर-31015/33/2008 ओ.आर. 11 |

ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 10th April , 2009

S. O. 1004. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra (Gujarat) to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub -section (1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962(50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri F. A. Babi Competent Authority, Mundra-Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, HPCL Kandia terminal -2, Bungalow No. -1 , Khari Rober , Gandhidham -370 201 , Kutch (Gujarat ) .

1877

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

State : GUJARAT

District : KUTCH

Taluka : BHACHAU

Ares

Nameof Village

SurveyNo.

Sub-Division No. Hectare Are

Square meter Sr. No.

930

1 BHACHAU

901

2 LAKHPAT

649

3 ADHOI

614

600

602

[F. No. R-31015/33/2008- O.R. -II ]

A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy

नई दिल्ला, 16 अप्रैल, 2009

का. आ. 1005.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुद्धा (गुजरात) से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉपोरशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जन्नत्ता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीत्तर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री एफ. ए. बाबी. सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मुन्द्रा- दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कोपर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड एच.पी.सी.एल. कंडला टर्मिनल -2, कंक्लोझ -1 , खारी रोहर, गांधीधाम -370 240 , कच्छ, (गुजरात), को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 1878

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA APRIL 18 , 2009/ CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[Part II Sec. 3 ( ii ) |

राज्य: गुजरात

तालुका: राधमपुर

माँव का बाम

जजय से.

सं.

क्रम सं.

हेक्टेवर

वर्ग मीटर

क्षेत्रफल एवर

1 सांथली

93 2 चलवाहा

[फा. सं. आर 31015/36/2008 श्री.आर. || |

ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 16th April , 2009

S. O. 1005. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra (Gujarat) to Delhi , a pipeline should be laid by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962(50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein ;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri F. A. Babi Competent Authority, Mundra-Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited , HPCL Kandla tesimat-2, Bungalow No. - 1 , Khari Rohar , Gandhidham -370 201 , Kutch (Gujarat) .

1879 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

Taluka : RADHANPUR

District : PATAN

State : GUJARAT

Area

Name of Village SurveyNo.

Sub-Division No.

Are

Hectare

Sr. No.

Square meter 2

7 1 SANTHALI

2 CHALWADA

[F. No. R -31015/36/2008 - O.R. - II ] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy

नई दिल्ली, 16 अप्रैल, 2009

का. आ. 1006.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मुन्द्रा (गुजरात) से दिल्ली तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इस से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री एफ. ए. बाबी. सक्षम प्राधिकारी, मुन्द्रा-दिल्ली पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद पाइपलाइन, हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कोर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड एच.पी.सी.एल. कंडला टर्मिनल 2, बंग्लोझ 1 , खारी रोहर, गांधीधाम -370 240 , कच्छ, (गुजरात) , को लिखित रुप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 18, 2009 ACHAITRA 28, 1931

[Part II-Sec.3(ii)] सं.

151

1 सचिनपुर

38 2 उनरोट

पी

185

67 14/9

14/7 के चीन

00 00 00 888888 00

885 6

00 .

65 3

246

238

[ फा. सं . आर-31015/35/2008 ओ.आर.1 ]

ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 16thApril, 2000

S. 0. 1006-Whorens it appears to the Central Govemment that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Mundra (Gujarat) to Delhi , a pipeline should be leidby Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that fer the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be leid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1 ) of section3 ofthe Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Apisition of Right ofUser in Land)Act, 1962(50 of1962), the Central Government hereby decieves its intention to acquire theright ofuser therein;

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

1881

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28, 1931

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the public, object , in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri F. A. Babi Competent Authority, Mundra-Delhi Petroleum Product Pipeline , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited , HPCL Kandla terminal- 2, Bungalow No. - 1 , Khari Rohar , Gandhidham -370 201 , Kutch (Gujarat).

SCHEDULE

District: PATAN

Taluka : SANTALPUR

Name of Village

SurveyNo.

Sr. No.

3 1 SANTALPUR

151

165 2 UNROT

In Bet. 14/9 & 14/7 Cart track

246

4 3 ZEKADA

245

238 1330 GI/09-19

State: GUJARAT

Area

Sub- Division No. Hectare Are

Square meter

24 P

67 9

15 6

10 8

99 5

49 [F. No. R-31015/35/2008 - O.R. - II ]

A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy 1882

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 16 मार्च , 2009

का.आ.1007.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट (संदर्भ सं. 90/1994) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/397/93- आई. आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT New Delhi , the 16th March , 2009 S.O. 1007.-- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Contral Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 90/1994) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. I , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . B.C.C. Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 16-3-2009 .

[No. L - 20012/ 397/93 - IR(C- I ) ]

SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . I, DHANBAD In the matter of a reference U/ s . 10 (1 ) ( d) (2A) of 1.D. Act.

Reference No. 90 of 1994

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Hurriladih Colliery of M/ S . BCCI . AND

Their workman

Present : Shri B. M. Singh , Presiding Officer APPEARANCES

For the Employers : Shri S.N. Sinha , Advocate .

For the Workman : Shri R.N. Ganguly, Advocate .

State : Jharkhand . Industry: Coal . Dated, the 3rd Februray, 2009 AWARD

1. By Order No. L - 20012 (397) /93 - IR(C - I ) dated 8-4-94 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

"Whether the action of the management of Hurriladih Colliery of M/ s . BCCL, under Bhalgora Area of M/ s . B.C.C.L. , P.O. Jharia , Distt . Dhanbad in dismissing Shri Rajbali Yadav , underground Trammer/Attendance Clerk from the services ofthe company w.e.f. 3-3-92 is justified ? If not , to what

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii)] relief the workman is entitled ?"

2. The concerned workman has filed written statement stating that he was initially working in permanent post as underground Trammer from 17-4-78 and subsequentlybecame Attendance Clerk in BCCL's Hurriladih Colliery of Bhalgora Area. He was discharged from his serviceby the General Manager ofBhalgora Area byhis letter No. BCCL: BA :GM: SECY : F : 23:92: 2394dated3rd March, 1992 with immediate effect . During the course of his employment Identity Card No. 122991 was issued to him . In the above - mentioned letter of termination of service of Sri Yadav, it was alleged that on 26-2-92, 1-3-92 and 28-2-92 he committed acts of misconduct mantioned therein and keeping in view ofthe gravity ofmisconduct of serious nature he was discharged. BCCL has got Certified Standing Orders . It has specifically been mentioned that no disciplinary action either by way of termination of services or otherwise can be effected lawful without serving the concerned workman a mamo of charge- sheet , giving him an opportunity to submit his explanation , holding domestic enquiry impartiallyand in accordance with the principles of natural justice.The relevant rules ofthe Certified Standing Orders are cited below :-

27.1 Minor penalty : Where a workman is charged with a misconduct which may lead to imposition of a minor penalty , he shall be informed in writing of the allegations made against him and shall be given an opportunity to explain his conduct within 48 hours . His explanatin , if any , shall be considered before imposing a minor penalty by the disciplinary Authority . Provided , however , that where a workman denied the charges alleged against him, no punishment shall be imposed upon unless a domestic enquiry has been conducted .

27.2 Major penalty : Where a workman is charged withamisconduct which may lead to the imposition of a major penalty, he shall be informed in writing. ofthe allegations against him and shall be given an opportunity to explain his conduct within a period of 7 days . On receipt of a workman's explanation , if it is decided to proceed further , an enquiry shall beheld. Such enquiry will be conducted by an officer other than the Officer who either reported the alleged misconduct or issued the charge- sheet . At the enquiry, the employee concerned shall be afforded reasonable opportunity of explaining and defending his conduct with the assistance of the follow workman or office -hearer of the Trade Union of which he is a member if so requested by him . Where such enquiry relates to the alleged misconduct of several workman , the enquiry may beheld for all the workman together.

It has been submitted that by deliberately ignoring the above rules of the Certified Standing Orders , the General Manager has acted arbitrarily , wrongly and 1883 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

illegally as he has not been conferred with the powers under the Standing Orders to terminate the service of the workman without holding enquiry and proving the charge ofalleged misconduct by producing legal evidence during the course ofdomestic enquiry . The order of termination passed by the General Manager , Bhalgore Area is a colourable exercise of the powere of the standing orders for which he had no legal right . Thus the order of termination of Shri Yadav is void, invalid, illegal and the termination of service of Shri Yadav amounts to retrenchment as this is a case of termination simplicitor . It has been submitted that the order of termination of service of the concerned workman with effect from 3-3- 1992 is vitiated due to non- observance of the basic principles of natural justice . It has been prayed that an award be passed holding that the termination of service of the concerned workman is illegal, unjustified and void- ab- initio and the concerned be reinstated in service with full back wages .

of the Indian Companies Act for the purpose of better management ofthe Coal Industry initially under the private hand and later on nationalisation by the Central Government under the provision of Coal Mines Nationalisation Act . A very pecular atmosphere preveil in the colliery area where in each and every workman in order to reign supreme by taking law into their own hand for their own interest and detrimental to the interest of the employer indulging in unlawful and violent activities and keeping in mind that aspect so that its colliery working doesnot suffer . Management has introduced clause 28 in the Standing Order which enable the management to dischargee in the event of their becoming a problem for the safety of the working of the mine as well as of the co- workers . It has been stated that the workman , Rajbali Yadav was anAttendance Clerk at Burriladih colliery before his dismissal from service and his discharge from service is fully justified . The concerned workman although designated as U.G. Trammer but as a matter of fact he was deputed to work as Attendance Clerk in the 2nd.shift of26-2-92 commencing from 4 P.M. and ending 12 hours . Hewas according to work in the attendance cabin situated atthe relevent Burriladih colliery. After expiry of his duty hours the workman was required to hand over the charge to its next man, namely, Suresh Singh , the Attendance Clerk of the end shift. Sri Yadav however did not hand over the charge to Suresh Singh after the expiry of his shift although Sri Singh came for duty in time , instead Sri Yadav collected violent mob of large number of person mostly outsider armed with lethal weapons, like , bows , arrows, hockey sticks , lathis etc. and created violent scene near 18 seam incline mouth . Sri Yadav also assulated the mining sirdar of the coliery, Sri B.D. Singh and the Attendance Clerk, Suresh Singh without any reason but for the purpose of creating penicky situation amongst the supervisory staff and the workman so that the shift was closed resulting complete stoppage production. Such act of Sri Yadav is apparently detrimental to the interest of the company as well as injuries to the safety of the other employees of the colliery. Sri Yadav repeated the same violent attitude by arranging a similar gathering of persons including outsiders having lethal weapons in their hands which admittedly and unlawful assembly on 28-2-92 just when the 2nd shift near the incline south of the 18 seam was to be started . By creating a violent scene due to gatharing of such persons with weapons in unlawful assembly Sri Yadav threatened the workmen of the 2nd shift commanding them not to go down the mine and thereby to stoptop the working of the related incline . Admittedly due to fear of violance most of the workmen did notjoin the duty and the attendance of the workmen's present being very thin and the production of coal in the related incline was seriously hampered and affected . Sri Yadav on 1-3-92 at about 4 P.M. climbed over the head gear of No. 1 pit of the Hurriladih colliery and stopped movement of the winding pulley which the workmen from the pit could not come out till 8 A. M. of the next day and thereby creating a dangerous condition in the mine and such act ofSri Yadav could have resulted in a fatal accident causing loss of life and property of the manpower . Sri Yadav repeated the same fit of stopping the movement of 3. The management has filed written statement stating that preliminary objection regarding maintainability ofthe reference has been raised by the management on the ground that the reference has been made without application of the mind by the appropriate Government and in that view the reference is not maintainable . It has also been stated that there is no dispute inspute in the related matter which is fit for reference under Industrial Disputes Act and thereby the reference is not tenable . The reference has been made by the appropriate Government overlooking the admitted facts that the workman is in the habit of indulged in riotious behaviour and during the course of emplyment which had caused serious endanger to the life and security of the co - employee as well as of the machineries in the colliery. The disorderly behaviour of theconcernedworkman . For repeated disorderly behaviour ofthe workman inspite of several warning the workman rendered himself not fit for continue in service of the company and thereby he has been discharged under Certified Standing Orders of the company which does not call for any interference by the appropriate Government , as such disorderly, riotious , violent behaviour of the workman has become a choronic administrative problem forthe employer and the employer had no other alternative other than to invoke the condition of the Standing Order in discharging the workman. The appropriate Government also failed to take into consideration the appeal made by the workman before the management dated 23-1-93 wherein he has admitted his such violent activities which forced the management to discharge him in terms of the Standing Orders . Even after submission of the representation the violent activities ofthe workman went on unabated, ultimately forcing the management to discharge vide letter dated 3-3-92 . Keeping into consideration the above facts the appropriate Govt . would have rejected the workman's prayer for reference of the dispute to a Tribunal for adjudication . The referred to thisTribunal is not an industrial dispute within the meaning of Sec . 2(k) of the I.D. Act, 1947. Without prejudice to aforementioned preliminary objection the management has submitted that the employer/ management is a public sector Company constituted by the Central Govt . under Sec . 617 1884

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/ CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii )]

6. In spite of several warning the concerned workman committed very serious misconduct and he became riotious and violent behaviour resulting to which the management has to suffer heavy loss and damage to thecompany. Moreover, the concerned workman admitted his guilt by petition dated 27-6-92 that he was not medically fit. Such type ofworkman should not be allowed to remain in the company even a single day because the conduct of the concerned workman was not only one but it continued number of time and number of days and as per StandingOrders Clause-28.0 the C.M.D. has got every power to discharge such person from work ofthe company. There is no illegality in discharging or dismissing the concerned workman from the service of the Company.

7. Accordingly, following award is rendered:-

The action of the management of Burriladih colliery ofM/ s . BCCL under Bhalgora Area of M /s . BCCL , P.O. Jharia , Distt . Dhanbad in dismissing Shri Rajbali Yadav , underground Trammer/Attendance Clerk from the service of the company w.e.f. 3-3- 92 isjustified and the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief.

H. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer . नई दिल्ली, 16 मार्च, 2009

the winding pulley on 2-3-92 at 9 A.M. thereby stopping the entire production work of coal in the colliery. Such unlawful deliberate conduct of the concerned workman management suffered heavily on various grounds inclusive of loss of production to the tune of about 240 tonnes of coal and loss of manpower to the extent of 530 man -shift causing final loss to the company of about Rs . 3 lakhs . Keeping in mind the above serious nature of deliberate conduct of the concerned workman the C.M.D. of the company, the authority vested with the power took the possession todischarge the concerned workman from the service of the company and accordingly the concerned workman was dismissed vide letter dated 3-3-1992 . The continued ,deliberate, malafide action of the workman was reported to the C.M.D. ofthe company and the said C.M.D. of the company in consideration of the merit of the case after being satisfied that it was inexpedient or against the interest of the company to continue to employ the concerned workman, passed an order discharging the concerned workman from service of the company under Clause 28 of the Certified Standing Orders applicable to theworkman. In view of above: discharge from the service of the concerned workman is absolutely just and proper and the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief. Accordingly, it has been prayed that the prayer of the workmanbe rejected.

का. आ. 1008.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. - 1 धनबाद के पंचाट (सदर्भ सं. 165/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/345/97- आई. आर. ( सी. 1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 16th March, 2009 4. Rejoinder has been filed by the concerned workman stating that the preliminary objection of the employer that the reference is bad in law and not legally maintainable and the reasons and grounds given in detail are quite wrong, misconceived and misdirected. The true legal implication and position relating to the exercise of power ofthe appropriate Government for making reference has not been understood and followed by the employer. This is the prerogative and satisfaction of the appropriate Government for making reference on the basis of materials produced before it . The objection is quite frivolous and invalid. Further contentions of the paragraphs are denied bythe workman.

S.O. 1008.-in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 165/ 2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. I, Dhanbad now as shown in the annexure , in Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . BCC Ltd. and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 16-3-2009.

[No. L-20012/345/97 - IR (C - 1 ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1 , DHANBAD .

In the matter of a reference U/ s . 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) ( 2A) of I.D. Act.

Reference No. 165 of 2000

Parties :Employers in relation to the management of Bhowra Area of M/ s . B.C.C. Ltd. 5. The management has produced MW- 1- Suresh Singh-who have proved Exts . M - 1 , M -2 and M-3 . MW-2-Loknath Ram , who was deputed to give charge- sheet and he stated " Since the year 1990 I am working inHurralidih colliery as Peon . I know the concerned workman , Rajbali Yadav. For the service of chargesheet upon the concerned workman with respect to the incident dated 25-2-92 I had been deputed by the management . I met the concerned workman while he was on duty at quarry.He received the copy of the said chargesheet , read out the contents of the same and then he handed back the same to me and refused to receive the same . I had asked him to receive the said chargesheet and to put his signature in the Peon Book which I was carrying with me , in token ofacceptance . Neither he received the said letter or the chargesheet nor he agreed to put down his signature in the PeonBook. I do not know the details about alleged incident for which the concerned workman was chargesheeted. " Management also produced MW- 3-Janak Das Pandey, who was Sr. Personnel Officer . He has proved Exts. M-4, toM-9.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1885

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

AND Their workmen

Present : Shri H. M. Singh, Presiding Officer APPEARANCES

For the Employer : Shri D.K. Verma , Advocate

For the Workman : Shri D. Mukherjee, Secretary, Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union

Industry : Coal State : Jharkhand Dated, the 2nd March, 2009 .

AWARD

1. ByOrder No. L -20012/345/ 97 - IR ( C - I ) dated 26-5-2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial disputes Act, 1947 , referred the followingdispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

union protested and challenged the statement of the management by drawing the attention of the management to adecision of the Hon'ble Tribunal in similar nature of case which was also confirmed by the Hon'ble High Court and Supreme Court but without any effect. So the conciliationproceeding ended in failure . The appropriate Government without appreciating the law rejected the dispute at the instance of the management . The union challenged the decision of the Government before the Hon'bleHigh Court, Patna, Ranchi Bench and the Hon'ble High Court vide order dated 2-11-98 in CWJC No. 3298 (R) directed the Government to refer the dispute for adjudication and thereafter the dispute has been referred to this Hon'ble Tribunal . It has been stated that the action ofthe management of Bhowra Area of M/ s . BCCL in not regularising the services of the concerned workman is neither legal nor proper . The action of the management is discriminatory in nature and against the decision of the Tribunal and the Hon'ble Supreme Court. So , it has been prayed that the Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to answer the reference in favour of the workman by directing the management to regularise the concerned workmen as Linemen and to pay them wages as per NCWA with retrospective effect with all arrear of wages and consequential benefits .

"Whether the action of the management of M/ s. B.C.C.L. , Bhowra Area in not regularising the service of Sri Shatrughan Prajapati , Santosh Gorai , Rambali Pandit and Nirmal Kumar Chakraborty, Linemen is just and proper ? If not, to what relief are the workmen entitled and from what date ?"

2. Written Statement has been filed on behalf of the concerned workmen stating that Shatrughan Prajapati , Santosh Gorai , Rambali Pandit and Nirmal Kumar Chakrabortyhave been working as Linemen in maintaining the telephone of M/ s . BCCL of Bhowra Area since long with unblemished record of service . The concerned workmen have been performing the permanent nature of Job of Linemen at Bhowra Colliery since long the satisfaction of the management and under the direct control and supervision of the management and as such they have put in more than 240 days attendance in each calendar year . The concerned workmen have been rendering services and producing goods for the benefit of the management and all the implements for execution of the job are also being supplied by the management . The management to camouflage the real issue and to deprive the concerned workmen of their proper wages and other attendant benefits has been disbursing their wages in the name of different intermediaries . The concerned workmen represented before the management Several times for their regularisation and wages as per NCWA but without any effect. So seeing no other alternative an industrial dispute was raised before the A.L.C. ( C. ) , Dhanbad demanding regularisation of the workmen . The management appeared and filed its comments wherein and whereby the plea of the management that allegedly the concerned workmen were the employees of M/ s . Premier Udyog, an alleged Contractor Firm and allegedly the alleged Firn had been allotted the work of maintenance of internal telephone line of Bhowra Area. As per management the telephone lines are maintained by the Government employee and private lines are maintained by the Contractor employees . The

4. Written Statement has been filed on behalf of the management stating therein that the present reference is not maintainable either in law or in fact and there exists no employer employees relationship between the management and the concerned workmen . It has been stated that the management awarded contract to M/s. Premier Udyog , Dhanbad for installation telephone for internal use in between the Area and the Units of Bhowra Area for a limited period . The management does not require regular service of Wiremen and Linermen , as the communication system is mainly based on the Government Telephone Department . The persons concerned have been engaged by M/ s . Premier Udyog , the contractor, for installation and maintenance of the telephone lines. The persons concerned are demanding regularisation through sponsoring union in the services of M/ s . BCCL . The management neither selected them nor recruited them nor paid them any wages nor alloted any work to them at any time. The concerned persons were appointed for execution of the job awarded to them . The job entrusted to M/ s . Premier Udyog is not prohibited under Contract Labour Act. The persons concerned through the sponsoring union are trying to make out a case for back door entry in M/ s . BCCL service of the above persons . The management of Bhowra Area, an Unit of M/s . BCCL is a registered Government Company . The recruitment of any person in the services of M/s. BCCL is made in accordance with the provisions of recruitment and rules made thereunder considering the Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India . M/ s . BCCL is under the B.I.F.R. and having huge surplus manpower . The action of the management is legal and justified.

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] 1886

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

In rejoinder it has also been stated the concerned personswere never recruited by the management and the job of installation and maintenance of internal telephone was awarded to M/s . Premier Udyog, a contractor. They never worked under the control and supervision of the management. So , it has been prayed that the action ofthe management in not regularising the concerned workmen isjust and proper .

of the management referred 2001 Lab . I.C. 3656 (Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. National Union Water Front Workers& others) in which the Hon'ble Supreme Court laiddown-"Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act (37 of 1970) S. 10 Prohibition of Contract Labour- Automatic absorption of Contract Labour by principal employer-Not contemplatedby Act Contract labour however to be given preference in employment by principal employer ."

Thelearned counsel of the management also referred 2006 Supreme Court Cases ( L & S) 753 (Secretary, State ofKarnataka and others Vs. Umadevi ( 3 ) and others ) in which the Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down-- 5. The concerned workmen filed written statement denying the facts which have been stated by the management in its written statement. It has also been denied that the management does not require regular service of wiremen and linemen as allegedly communication system mainly based on alleged Government Telephone Department. It has been prayed for answering the reference in favour of the workmen.

6. On behalf of the concerned workman WW- 1 Rambali Pandit has been examined who has proved documents , Exts . W- 1 to W- 5 and the management has examined MW - 1 Asim Kumar Sarkar who has proved Exts. M- 1 to M -3 in a bunch .

7. Main argument on behalf of the concerned workmen is that they are workmen of the management because Gate Passes have been issued to the workmen for performance oftheir duties . In this respect the management argued that the Gate Pass is issued only to enter into the premise to perform job in a particular day . There is no weight in the argument of the workmen because Gate Pass is only issued to enter for a particular day for doing particular job and it does not confirm that the Gate Pass is issued to the workman of the management because the management issues Identity Card to their workmen and not Gate Pass .

8. In this respect another argument which has been advanced by the counsel of the management that WW- 1 stated in cross - examination at page 2 that initially Premier Udyog, Baker Band , Dhanbad, was Contractor for repair oftelephone line . Again says - I do not know ifthere was any contractor . We were not working under the aforesaid contractor . The management has not given us any appointment letter . At page 3 he has stated that none ofus among the concerned workmen were given any appointment letter. For payment of wages we have not received any payment slips . In this respect the workmen have not filed any pay slip to show that they are employees ofthe management . It shows that they are the workmen of contractor for whom contract has been awarded as per Exts . M - 1 , M- 2 , and M - 3 . It shows that the contract was awarded to the Premier Udyog and for which tender was invited and when bill was raised by Premier Udyog , contractor , the payment was made .

"A. Constitution of India-Arts . 32, 136, 141 & 226 and 16 , 14 & 309 and 38 & 39 (a)-Public employment-Absorption , regularisation , or permanent continuance oftemporary, contractual , casual , daily-wage or ad hoc employees appointed/recruited and continued for long in public employment dehors the constitutional scheme ofpublic employment -Issuance of directions for, and for stay of regular recruitment process for the posts concerned- Impermissibility of Need for addressing concerns of equity for all , and not of just the few before the court, byupholding of constitutional scheme of public employment, whose hallmark is equality of opportunity- Held, Supreme Court and High Courts should not issue such directions unless the recruitment itself was made regularly and in terms of the constitutional scheme- Reasons for, discussed extensively-Financial/economic impact of such directions , as a factor-The wide powers under Act , 226 are not intended to be used for issuance of such directions , certain to defeat the concept of social justice, equal opportunity for all and the constitutional scheme of public employment-Supreme Court is bound to insist on the State making regular recruitments and appointments and not to encourage or shut its eyes to the persistent transgression of the rules of regular recruitment-It is erroneous for Supreme Court to merely consider equity for the handful of people who have approached the court with a claim whilst ignoring equity for the teeming millions seeking employment and a fair opportunity for compeling for employment -Further , courts must be careful in ensuring that they do not interfere unduly with the economic/ financial arrangement of the affairs ofthe State or its instrumentalities . Phenomenon of" litigious employment " which had arisen due to issuance of such directions by High Courts , and even Supreme Court, highlighted-Held, merely because an employee had continued under cover of an order of the court , under "litigious employment " or had been continued beyond the term of his appointment by the State or its instrumentalities , he would not be entitled to any right to be absorbed or made permanent in service , merely on the strength of such continuance , if the original appointment was not made by following a due process of selection as envisaged by the relevant rules-It is further not open to the court to prevent regular recruitment at the instance of 9. When there is no appointment letter and there is no any document ofpayment ofwages by the management to the concerned workmen they cannot be treated as employees of the management on which basis they can be regularised in any way. In this respect the learned counsel 1887

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

such employees Unsustainability of claim to permanence on basis of long continuance in irregular or illegal public employment, discussed in detail .

amount to perpetuating an illegality-Hence in doing complete justice under Art. 142, Supereme Court would not normally give a go-by to the procedure established by law in the matter of public employment .

E. Constitution of India-Arts . 226, 32, 236 and 142- Interference in service matters- Interim directions-Scope for-Absorption , regularisation, or permanent continuance of temporary , contractual, casual, daily-wage or ad hoc employees appointed/recruited dehors the constitutional scheme of public employment-- Scope for issuance of interim directions for-Held , in such cases High Court may not be justified in issuing interim direction-Reasons for, discussed--Interim relief.

-Held , decisions of the Supreme Court running counter to or containing directions counter to these principles will stand denuded of their states as precedents-Union and State Governments and their instrumentalities directed to set in motion the process for regular recruitment in cases where temporary or daily- wagers were employed against vacant sanctioned posts , within six months of the date of this judgement-Further, cases of irregular appointments (not illegal appointments) ofduly qualified persons in duly sanctioned vacant posts , who had continued to work for ten years or more , but without the intervention of orders of courts or tribunals , may have to be considered for regularisation on merits in light ofthe principles laid down in this case, as a one-time measure, within six months of the date of this judgement.

F. Constitution of India-Art . 226-Exercise of power under-Relief that may be granted-Role of High Courts under-Held, the wide powers under Art . 226 are not intended to be used for the purpose of perpetuating illegalities , irregularities or improprieties- Role of High Courts as sentinels and as guardians of equal rights protection should not be forgotten.

G. Casual Labour/Temporary Employee-Status andrights of-Unequal bargaining power-Effect-Held, such employees do not have any right to regular or permanent public employment- Further , temporary, contractual , casual , ad hoc or daily - wage public employment must be deemed to be accepted by the employee concerned fully knowing the nature of it and the consequences flowing from it-Reasons for, discussed indetail.

H. Constitution of India-Arts . 136 , 32 and 141- Adverse effect of trying to individualise justice on inconsistent precedents constituting the binding law ofthe land-Jurisprudence-Justice versus law-Equity- Equity versus law.

I. Constitution of India --Arts . 141 and.142- Direction given by constitutional Bench for overruling of all past precedents which ran counter to principles laid down as law herein.

B. Constitution of India-Arts . 142, 32 & 136 and Parts III and IV-Role of Supreme Court-Individualising of justice to suit a given situation-Scope for Assumption re parties before the court being representative of the cause-- Propriety- Need for balancing of rights of the numerous not before the court as against the few who are before the court-Held, We have given unto ourselves a system of governance by rule oflaw-The role of the Supreme Court is to render justice according to law-It is expected to decide questions of law for the country and not to decide individual cases without reference to principles of law in the name of individualising justice it is not possible for the Supreme Court to shut its eyes to the consitutional scheme and the right of the numerous as against the few who are before the court-Directive principles of State policy have also to be reconciled with the rights available to the citizen under Part III and the obligation of the State to one and all and not to a particular group of citizens-Practice and Procedure- Rule of law-Meaning of Implications of a system of governance by rule of law , for Appex Court ofthe land .

J. Appointment-Modes of appointment- Permissible modes-Absorption , regularisation , or permanent continuance oftemporary , contractual , casual , daily-wager or ad hoc employees appointed/recruited dehors the constitutional scheme of public employment on issuance ofdirections by court therefor-Held, issuance of such directions amount to creating another mode of public appointment , which is not permissible . "

Inview of the facts and law, as stated above, the concerned workmen are not entitled for regularisation in the services ofthe management of M/ s . BCCL.

C. Constitution of India-Arts . 141 , 32, 136 and 142-Duty of Supreme Court acting as Constitutions Court-Rule and approach of a Constitutional Bench of Supreme Court-Uncertainty and divergence ofapproach and views in decisions of Supreme Court-Need for firm decision by Supreme Court one way or another , emphasised . Held, in such cases it is necessary to put an end to uncertainty and clarify the legal position emerging from the constitutional scheme, leaving the High Courts to follow necessarily the law thus laid down-A Constitutional Bench has to lay down the law - It has to approach the question as a constitutional court should- Precedents.

10. Accordingly , I render the following award- The action ofthe management of M/s . B.C.C.Ltd. Ehowra Area in not regularising the services of Sri Shatrughan Prajapati , Santosh Gorai , Rambali Pandit and Nirmal Kumar Chakraborty, Linemen, is just and proper and the concerned workmen are not entitled to any relief.

H. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer D. Constitution of India--Art . 142- Exercise of power under-Scope " Complete justice "-Meaning ofHeld, complete justice would be justice according to law, and though it would be open to Supreme Court to mould the relief, it would not grant relief which would 1888

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] नई दिल्ली , 16 मार्च, 2009

sub-section ( 1 ) and sub -section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

SCHEDULE

का.आ. 1009.-औद्योगिक विकद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार है. बी.सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. I धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संखना- 207/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/17/2000 - असई. आर( सी -1 ) ]

" क्या मैसर्स भारत कोकिंग कोल लिमि. के कुस्टोर क्षेत्र के शिमला बहाल खदान में प्रबंधन द्वारा कर्मचारी श्री शंकर सिंह रात्रि प्रहरी को दिनांक 30-6-1999 से सेवानिवृत करना ऐसी परिस्थिति में जबकि प्रबंधन के स्वंय के भिन्न- भिन्न अभिलेखों के कर्मचारी की जन्म तिथि/उम्र भिन्न-भिन्न अंकित है , न्यायिक, विधिक तर्कसंगत एवं उचित है ? यदि नहीं, तो कर्मकार किन लाभों के लिए हकदार है ? " स्नेह लता जकास , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi, the 16th March , 2009

S.O. 1009.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 207/ 2000) ofthe Central Government industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, No. I, Dhanbad, now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relationto the management of M/ s BCC Ltd. and their workman, which wasreceivedby the Central Goversament on 16-3-2009.

[No. L-20012/ 17/2000- IR(C-1 )]

SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALNO. 1, DHANBAD

Inthematter ofa reference U/s . 10( 1)(d) (2A) of I.D. Act .

Reference No. 207 of2000

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Simlabahal Colliery ofM/s . B.C.C. Ltd.

AND

Their workman

Present: Shri B.M. Singh , Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES

For theEmployers

Shri H. Nath , Advocate

For the workman

: Shri Ram Ratan Ram,

JointGeneral Secretary

State: Jharkhand

Industry: Coal

Dated, the 9th March, 2009.

2.The concerned workman has filed written statement stating that the concerned workman , Shankar Singh , Ex-NightGuard was a permanant workman in Simlabahal Colliery under Kustore Area of M/ s . BCCL bearing his C.M.P.F.A/ C No. C/285724 , Form B No. 1845 and Κ.Β.No.152079 . His designation was Night Guard since the date of his appointment . He was first appointed in Ena Colliery on 1-1-1961 under the same area . He was transferred from Ena Colliery to Muraidih Colliery ofM/ s . BCCL. Than he was transferred from Muraidih Collieryto Ena colliery on 21-11-79. The management of Muraidih collierymade service description ( Seva Bivaran ) to the said workman as per the record of Ena Colliery i.e. while transferving from Muraidih to Ena Colliery on 21-1-79, the management ofMuraidih colliery recorded his date ofbirth as35years as on 2-2-78 . The date of birth of the workman isrecorded in Form ' B ' as 31 years as on 1972. The date of birthofthe concerned workman is recorded in his service excerpt as 22 years in 1961. The concerned workman approached the management several times to assess his dateofbirth,but the management never heard his grievance. The management of Simlabahal Colliery wrongly and illegally superannuated to the concerned workman from service on 30-6-99 . The concerned workman raised an industrial dispute on 11-3-99 regarding assessmant of his ofbirth. While recording the date ofbirth ofthe concerned workman , the management never consent to the concerned workman and the said workman does not know how to read or write English . The date of birth of the said workman isrecorded different in different records i.e. 35 years as on 2-2-78 in Seva Bivaran , 31 years as on 1972 in Form ' B ' Register and22years on 1961 in service excerpt . The actual date ofbirth ofthe said workman is 2-2-78 as recorded first in Seva Bivaran by the management , but he was superasted on 30-6-96 from his service which is illegal , improper and unjustified. It has been prayed that an award be passed in favour of the concerned workman with full backwages.

AWARD

By Order No. L -20012/ 17/2000- IR-( C-I ) dated 24-7-2000 theCentral Government in the Ministry ofLabour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of

3. Written statement has been filed on behalf of the management stating therein that the concerned workman was initially appointed as Security Guard at Simlabahal Collieryon 1-1-1961 . On the date ofhis appointment i.e. on भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

1-1-61, his date birth in all the Company's record has been recorded as 22 years . Accordingly his date of birth comes to 1-1-1939 and the concerned workman authenticated his date of birth by putting his signature in all the record of the company including Form ' B ' Register which is a statutory register under the Mines Act. In the, year 1987 service excerpt was issued to all the workers ofthe company with a viewto raise dispute in case of any wrong entry made in their service records. Even then the concerned workman did not raise any dispute , rather accepted the entries in the service excerpt and returned the same to the authorities after putting his signature . The concerned workman was superannuated from service after completing the age of 60 years as per date of birth recorded in the service register. The superannuation of the concerned workman after attaining the age of60 years is fullyjustified and the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief. The concernedworkman was appointed in the year 1961 and raised a dispute about his age after a delay of 38 years makes the demand a stale demand which is not maintanable in view of the decisions of Hon'ble Supreme Court and HighCourts.

In rejoinder it has been stated by the management that the concerned workman was superannuated w.e.f. 30-6-99 rightly on completing the age of60 years . The concerned workman put his signature in all the records regarding his date of birth . It has been prayed that an awardbe passedholding that the concerned workman was rightly retired from service and he is not entitled to any relief.

4.Rejoinder has been filed by the workman denying the written statement filed by the management stating that the concerned workman has not been retired from service legally. It has been prayed that an award be passed in favour ofthe workman .

5.The concernedworkman produced himselfas WW- 1 and proved documents . The management has produced MW- 1 - Satnarain Roy who has proved Exts . M - 1 , M-2, M-3, M-4 and M -4/ 1 . The management has also produced MW-2-Sunil Kumar.

6. The concerned workman's date of birth was mentioned in the company's record when he entered in service on 1-1-61 as 22 years and he has also signed in company's papers when he entered in service and he has stated in his cross-examination page 2 that in Form 'B ' Register of the year 1973 my signature is there which I identify(alreadymarked Ext. M- 1 ). The concerned workman had moved an application as per " Y" (marked for identification) that in Form ' B ' Register issued in the year 1972his date birth of31 years has wrongly been mentioned, which willbe 22years . But this fact has not been available because ofthe fact that when he entered in service on 1-1-61 1330 G1/09-20

1889 his age was 22 years and it cannot be again in 1972 his age was 22 years, because if it will be treated in 1972 he was 22 years of age though he entered in service in 1961 , it shows that in the year 1961 he was miner . As regards Form 'B' Register of the concerned workman which has been prepared in the year 1973 it has been mentioned 22 years as on 1-1-1961which confirms as per age mention when he gotservice in 1961 and he signed in the company's records. 22 years of age on 1-1-1961 shows that when he entered the service his date of birth was 1-1-1939 . Accordingly he should have been superannuated w.e.f.1-1-1999 but he has been superannuated w.e.f. 30-6-1999 by the management.

In view of the facts and circumstances mentioned above, the superannuation of the concerned workman on 30-6-1999 is legal and justified and he is not entitled to any relief.

7. Accordingly, following award is rendered. The action ofthe management of Simlabahal Colliery of Kustore Area of M /s . B.C.C. Ltd. in superannuating Shri Shankar Singh, Night Guard on 30-6-1999 is legal , proper and justified and the concernedworkman is not entitled to any relief.

H. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 16 मार्च, 2009

का.आ. 1010. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. इंडियन ऑयरन एण्ड स्टील कं.लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं.1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 104/1995 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/331 /94- आई.आर (सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता अवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 16th March , 2009

S.O. 1010.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 104/1995) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, No.1 , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Indian Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 16-3-2009 .

[No. L-20012/331/94-IR(C-1 ) ]

SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer 1890

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/ CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1, DHANBAD

Inthe matter of a reference U/s . 10( 1 )(d) (2A) of I.D. Act.

Reference No. 104 of1995

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Noonidih- Jitpur Colliery of M/ s . Indian Iron & Steel Co. Ltd.

AND

Theirworkmen

Present : Shri H.M. Singh , Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES

FortheEmployers : Shri D.K. Verma, Advocate.

For the Workmen : ShriB.B. Pandey,Advocate.

State : Jharkhand

Industry: Coal.

Dated, the 4th March ,2009

AWARD

By Order No. L- 20012/331 / 94- I.R . ( Coal - I ) dated 25-8-1995 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

"Whether the demand of the Union for placement in Technical and Supervisory Grade ' C ' as per the decision approved by the Standardization Committee of JBCCI w.e.f. 29-5-92 in respect of Shri Y.N. Choudhary and 7 others (as per annexure ) D.G. Operators is justified ? If not, to what relief these workmen are entitled to and from which date ? "

ANNEXURE

2.The written statement has been filed on behalf of the concerned workmen stating therein that Y.N. Choudhary and 7 other workmen have been working as D.G. Operators since 1-1-1987 at Noonidih - itpur Colliery ofM/s.Indian Iron & Steel Co. to the entire satisfaction of the management and they are getting Salary of Category- III & IV. The D.G. Sets installed at Noonidih- Jitpur Colliery are of bigger capacity and have the generating power of more electricity than the D.G. Sets of M/ s . BCCL. The concerned workmen have been getting less wages that what is to be paid to them , an industrial dispute was raised before the competent authority and it was demanded that the concerned workmen should be placed in Category -V and should be paid accordingly. The D.G. Operators of BCCL had been paid Category- V wages at the time when the concerned workmen were being paid the wages of Category- III & Category- IV and hence the demand for such categorywas raised in view of the various factors including the scale given for such works in M/S . BCCL . The D.G. Sets installed at Noonidih - Jitpur Colliery are of 1150 KVA to 1265 KVA capacity and while industrial dispute was raised before the Asstt . Labour Commissioner ( Central ), Dhanbad and which was pending for discussion conciliation it was learnt that the scale and grade of D.G. Operators have been finalised by the Standardisation Committee (Sub- Committee of J.B.C.C.I. ) on 29.5.92. As the management had not been implementing the recommendation/ approval of the said Committee, an implementation in struction was issued to all the concerned vide Instruction No. CIL/ JBCCI : IV: 1: 1 : No . 42/734 dated 7th May 1993.Accordingto categorisation made in the said implemention instruction the concerned workman fell in Serial No. 3 which is for D.G. Sets from 1001 KVA to 1500 KVA and they have been put in Technical and Supervisory Grade ' C ' and accordingly the concerned workmen are entitiled to be placed in Technical and Supervisory Grade ' C ' and their such demand isfullyjustified. The mangement should have implemented the said insturction but the said management has failed to implement the said lawful demand of the said workmen. It hasbeenprayed that the Hon'ble Tribunał maybe pleased to hold that the demand for placement in Technical & Supervisory Grade ' C ' as per decision approved by the standardisation committee of JBCCI w.e.f. 29.5.92 in respect of the concerned workmen .

1. Shri Y.N. Choudhary

2. Shri Gopal Mahato

3. Shr: D.N. Paswan

4. Shri S.C. Mishra

5. Shri Anath Tiwary

6. Shri Jaleshwar Mahato

7. Shri K.D. Mishra

8. Shri S.D. Paswan

3. The management has filed written statement stating that JBCCI issued the Circular No. 42 dated 7.5.1993 prescribing thejob description and qualifications of Diesel Generator Set Operators suggesting their fixation in different categories , namely, Category V and Category VI as well as Technical and Supervisory Grade C and GradeB. The JBCCI prescribed that the DG Set Operatiors should be such persons who are capable of checking the engine, alternator, control penel and compressor and they should checkall those parts as diesel generator set effectively and should be able to maintain them properly. They should [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1891 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

installed in a colliery . The rule is very clear that adequate number of various supervisors and electricians should be deputedwhile electrical energy is being used . The detailed rules required to observe at the time of production of electrical energy and its distribution to different panels . The concerned workmen were in category - I and category- II in the year 1986 when they were placed at D.G. set designating them as operators to perform the duties of attendants . It is Submitted that they were loosely called 'Operators ' as the job description for operators had not been specified by JBCCI and they were given promotion to Category- IV in the year 1990-91 to put them at per with electricians although they do not possess the wiremen's certificate as required for being placed as Electrician . As the concerned persons are not suitable for independently performing the jobs of Electrician having not possessed the necessary wireman certificate , they cannot be promoted to the post ofelectrician in Category- IV or Category - V and as they do not possess Electric Supervisory Certificate, they cannot be promoted to the post ofAssistant Foreman (E) inGrade 'C' or Foreman (E) in Grade 'B ' . The prescribed dutiesfor the operators designated under the cadre scheme cannot be performed by the concerned persons although they were designated as operators , on account of their lack ofqualifications , experience , knowledge and statutory requirement. Therefore , they cannot be placed in Technical Grade ' C' as demanded by them . The demand of the sponsoring union for giving them Grade ' C' which is given to Assistant Foreman ( E) without having any elementary qualifications of wiremanship Certificates , will be illegal andunjustified and it will cause great resentment amongst the workmen working in the entire coal industry if the persons of category I and II will be in Technical and supervisory Grade ' C' . As such , the demand of the sponsoring union has no merit at all and the said workman cannot demand for technical and supervisory Grade 'C' andthey are not entitled to any relief.

In rejoinder, to the management has stated almost same things which have been stated in their written statement .

4.Rejoinder has been filed on behalf ofthe concerned workman stating same thing as has been stated in the written statement filed earlier .

also carry on the duties relating to feeding electricity into different control panels besides performing day- to -day maintenance jobs and starting and stopping all the operating parts of the D.G. Set as and when required. D.G. Sethave been incorporated in the coal industry ofdifferent collieries for bringing into operation at the time of power failure of the main electric supply lines so as to serve as a safeguard for operating the winding engine used for lifting the workmen from underground to surface and operating mechanical ventilators to provide air with sufficient oxygen to keep the mine atmosphere in such a condition so as to make the ventilation adequate . It has been submitted that although the designations to such persons have been given asoperator, they are superior to electrician in Category - IV ofequivalent to Electric Supervisors working as Assistant Froemen (Elec.) or Foreman (Elec. ) in Grade ' C ' or Grade 'B' , as per the provisions of Indian Electricity Rules , no person can be allowed to inspect, examine and check the alternator, control switches and control panels unless he holds Electric Supervisor certificate. For the purpose of regular maintenance and cheking the lubrication of the engine and moving parts as well as for the purpose of checking and maintenance of the engine , alternator , control panel, control switches etc. of the D.G.Set , the management has deputed one person in Grade ' C ' and it is he who is in fact performing all the jobs prescribed under the circular for D.G. Set. Operators . The concerned persons merely serve as attandants just like fan attendant, switch board attendant etc. and they are only required to start and stop the diesel engine used for production of electricity in the alternator . For each shift one attendant is required and for the whole day of three shifts , three attendants should be provided. As the management was having surplus man -power , the management placed eight persons who were working as mazdoors in Category- 1 or Cateogery - II as attendants in the diesel generating sets , two persons in each shift , most ofthe time they had to idle away due to want of sufficient work . The concerned persons whose duties may be equivalent to those of attendants but they were designated as operators, to give them better status . As in the year 1986there was no cadre scheme and the persons equivalent toAssistant Foreman and Foreman could not be designated as operators at that time . The word " Operators " used in the circularNo. 42 had its own special meaning , the specific use for performing the duties of Electric Supervisor working asoperator for the reason Grade' C' and Grade 'B' had been sanctioned for such persons who are capable of repairing and maintenance of the alternators , switch gears , control panels, diesel engine , compressor etc. The aforesaid grades were not fixed for the persons performing the duties of attendants although designated as operators , The Indian Electricity Rules has to be complied with and the provisions ofRule 110 cannot be circumvented by entrusting with the duties of supervision , checking and inspection of alternators , control panels and switch gear besides the

5. The management has produced MW - I -C.N . Chako who deposed in the court to substantiate the written statement filed by the management and he stated in examination - in - chief that " I am posted at Jitpur Colliery as Asstt . Manager ( Personnel ) . I know the concerned workmen of this case . Presently they all are working as Attendants or Khalasie in D.G. Plant . D.G. Plant is meant for alternative power generation in case of power failure in the colliery. These who possess requisite qualification can only operate the power generation system . As per the statute only the electricians and electrical supervisors.can diesel engine and other parts connected with the D.G. Sets 1892

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18, 2000/ CHAITRA28 , 1931

work as D.G. Operators in electrical side and on mochanical sides fitters and foremanhaving requisite qualification and experience look after the maintenance and operatice ofthe system. For electricians requirement is that they should be matriculate having wiremen's Permit ofhigle tension line and for electrical supervisor the requirement is they must posses electrical supervisor Certificate. None of the concerned workmen has the said requisite qualification. The claim ofthe concernedwerkmen for thoir placement in Tech .& supervisory Grade 'C' is not justified. Minimum category as prescribed for electricians as per Coal Wage Agreement is category-IV.

6. On behalf of the workmen WW- 1 - Y.N. Choudhary has been produced to substantiate the workmen's case . The concerned Workman WW- 1 has stated in cross- examination at page-As per settlement dated 4-5-90 wehad agreed that we will be placed in category- III w.e.f. 1-5-90 . The company has already granted us category-III w.e.f. 1-5-90. Some of us are still in category - lf and some of us are at category- IV prior to the settlement . After the settlement dated 4-5-90 there has not been further any settlement or any award regarding categorisation of our service. We are still accepting that settlement . We were not given any notice to repudiate the settlement . We have gotno certificate under Indian ElectricityAct. We are not concerned with maintenance of electrical equipments . In collieryfan attendant operates fan . Similarlypump operator operates pump . Fan Operator or Pump Operator gets category- II fitters are given category IV, V and VI. Asst . foreman gets Grade 'C' and Foreman gets Grade 'B' . The electrical fitter has to possess wireman's Certificates under Electricity Act . Asstt . Foreman is required to possess supervisorship certificate in electric. Whenever there is any fault in the alternator or in any other part of the generator than Asstt . Foreman and Electrician comes for repairing of the same ." At page 3 the concerned woriuman WW- 1 has stated that Mechanical Technician, Fitter etc. are requisitioned for repair of thediesel engine" .

It shows that the concerned workmen have got no essential qualification under Indian Electricity Act for 'doing the job of alternator , electric repairing, D.G. Set operating.

As per documents filed from the side of the concerned workmen , Exts . W- 1 to W- 7 state clearly that D.G. Set Operators from 1001 kv . to 1500 kv . Tech. & supervisory or 'C' and above 1500 kv. Get Technical & SupervisoryGr. 'B' . But there is also qualification for getting grade 'C' and Grade 'B ' for operating D.G. Set for which the concerned workman has stated in cross- examination that they have got no such qualification, so they cannot get Technical & Supervisory Grade ' C ' or Grade 'B'. They are simplyAttendants , but designated as Operators and as they have got no qualification prescribed under Indian Electricity Rules for wiremenship, they cannot be given

[PART II-Sac. 3( ii) ] that very goode and moreover MW- I has accepted that sorae authorisation have been given category- IV and V. So, the management has considered, as per qualification and experience, to place thane in category-FV andV, but not inTochnical & SupervisoryGrade.

Inview of the discussions made above, the concerned wordsmen are not entitled to get any relief.

7.Accordingly, I render following award ...

Thedemand ofthe union for placement in Technical and supervisory Garde ' C' as per the decision approvedby the standardization committee of JBCCI w.e.f. 29-5-92 in respect of Shri Y.N. Choudhary and 7 others D.G. Operators is not justified and so the concerned worlcman are not entitled to any relief.

H. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 16 मार्च , 2009

का.आ. 1011.-औद्योगिक विबाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मैं. बी.सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अभिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं.। धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 24/1999) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-03-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/230/98- आई.आर ( सी.1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 16th March, 2009

S.O. 1011. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) . the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.24/1999) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , No.1 Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s BCCL Ltd. and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 16-03-2009 .

[No. L-20012/230/98- IR(C- 1 ) ]

SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

REPORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. L, AT DHANBAD Present: Shri Hari Mangal Singh, Presiding Officer. In the matter of an Industrial Dispute U/s . 10( 1 )( d ) (2A) of1.D.Act . 1947

Reference No. 24 of 1999 1893 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Angarpathara Colliery of M/s. BCCL and their Workman.

this case does not appear in form Pen -2 . The above certificate from BDO/Mukhiya of the home town of Shri Arjun Bhuia could not be submitted for the following reasons : -

APPEARANCES

Onbehalfof the : Workman Mr.D.Mukherjee , Advocate .

Onbehalf of the

: Mr. R.N. Ganguly, Advocate..

employers

(1 ) Shri Arjun Bhuia was born and brought up at Angarpathra colliery as his deceased father and mother both were the employee of the same colliery and had permanently settled there , having no immovable property at his native village.

State : Jharkhand.

Industry : Coal .

Dated, Dhanbad the 27th February, 2009.

AWARD

(2) the deceased mother of Shri Arjun Bhuia, Late Kaushilwa Bhuini was an emploee of Angarpathra colliery but she was subsequently transferred to west Mudidh colliery under the same Area . She was issued Service excerpts in the year 1987 by the Management for furnishing the details of her son Shri Arjun Bhuia and only married daughter Usha Bhuini .

TheGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour , in exercise of thepowers conferred on them under section 10 ( 1 )( d) of the I.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/230/ 98 - I.R. ( C- I ) , dated, the 29th January, 1999.

Similar family details was not submitted by Late Bhukhal Bhuia as the system of service excerpts under B.C.C.Ltd. was introduced only in the year 1987.

SCHEDULE

(4) The declaration made by the deceased mother of Shri Arjun Bhuia in the service excerpts is a sufficient document with the management to justify that Shri Arjun Bhuia is the son of Late Bhukhal Bhuia .

"Whether the action of the management of Angarpathra Colliery of M/ s . BCCL in not offering employment to Sri Arjun Bhuia, Ex - W/ Loader under para 9.4.2 of HCWA is justified? if not , to what relief the dependent son, Arjun Bhuia, S/o late Bhukhal Bhuia is entitled?"

(5) The Management has full liberty to verify the genuiness of the relationship of Shri Arjun Bhuia with Late Bhukhal Bhuia through District or Police Authority.

(6) Shri Arjun Bhuia has submitted the application for employment under B.C.C.L. as per prescribed norms after obtaining necessary certificate from Mukhiya and M.L.A. There is no reason for rejecting the certificate of Mukhia and M.L.A. in this case particularly when it is acceptable in all other cases by the B.C.C.L

Ithas been stated by the workman side that the action ofthe management of Angarpatha colliery in not offering employment to Shri Arjun Bhuia is not justified and prayer has been made to pass an Award directing the management to provide employment to Shri Arjun Bhuia under clause 9.4.2 ofNCWA within a reasonable /stipulated period avoide further financial loss .

3.Management side also filed its Written Statement stating therein that the present reference is not legally maintainable . It has been stated that the demand for employment of relatives of workers in Public Sector Undertaking is illegal being unconstitutional and no one can have any right to demand for employment of his relatives save and except on compassionate ground . According to the management Bhukhal Bhuia was a casual wagon loader at Angarpathra Colliery and he died on 2. In the Written Statement filed on behalf of the Workman it has been stated on behalf of the workman that Late Bhukhal Bhuia was a taken over employee of Angarpathra Colliery under Katras Area of M/ s B.C.C.L. Ltd. on 17-10-1971 and he was then engaged as wagon Loader at Angarpattra Colliery. Late Bhukhal Bhuia died on14-3-1982 in the colliery for which the death certificate was issued by the colliery doctor . It has been stated that his dependant son Shri Arjun Bhuia could not apply instantaneously for employment as he was a minor and his mother late Kaushilwa Bhuini was also an employee ofthe. same Colliery but subequently transferred to west Mudidh colliery under the same area . It has further been stated that the concerned workman after attaining the age of 18 years in the year 1994 applied for his own employment under B.C.C.L. under clause 9.4.2 of NCWA- II with all relevant documents along with identification certificate from M.L.A. of his constituency but the employer has not respondent tothe legal demand of the workman . However, in course of conciliation proceeding before the A.L.C. ( C), Dhanbad- I the employer through their written statement dated 14-5-96 in I.D. case No. 1/(203 ) /95 -E3 asked for a certificate from Mukhiya/BDO of his home town regarding genuinity of Shri Arjun Bhuia on the ground that the name of Shri Arjun Bhuia who is an applicant for employment in 1894

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]

workman also referred to a decision reported in 2007(4) JLJR page 145 wherein Hon'ble Supreme Court laiddown that there is no time limit for seeking employment under Section 2( p ) , 2( s ) and 18(3 ) of the 1.D. Act regarding compassionate appointment and when no period of limitation was provided in the settlement then the circular issued prescribing a period of limitation for filing application for grant of compassionate appointment has no statutory force. So there is no force in the argument of the Ld. Counsel forthe management because of the fact that the concerned workman had applied very late , his application could not be cosidered for compassionate appointment .

7. Ld. Counsel for the management argued that the concerned workman was not shown as dependant of the deceased employee Bhukal Bhuia so compassionate appointment could not be given because in so records of the company he has been shown as son . In this respect Ld . Counsel for the workman referred to a decision reported in (2008) 2 Supreme Court ( L& J page 238 in which Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down the following :-

14-3-82 . He declared Smt . Kaushilwa Bhuini as his wife andhe nominatedher for getting his provident fund etc. in the event ofhis death . In the Form Pen- Bhukhal Bhuia did not declare any person as his son and , therefore the question of admitting the concerned person Arjun Bhuia as his dependent son did not and-cannot arise . Management have submitted that they consider the cases of employment ofdependents on compassionate ground if the application is filed within reasonable time from the date ofdeath ofthe workman . The raising of the present demand at this late stage several years after the death of Bhukhal Bhuia is obviously not entertainable on account ofdelay and latches apart from being a case of doubtful in nature as his name does not appear in the Form Pen-2 . It has further been stated on behalf of the management that the concerned person Sri Arjun Bhuia has no right to raise any industrial dispute through any union when he was not a workman and late Bhukhal Bhuia cannot raise any dispute after his death , as he was also not member of the sponsoring union during his life time . Under such circumstances , the sponsoring union has no right to raise any dispute on his behalf. It has been submitted on behalfof the management that for providing employment on compassionate ground on the strength of 9.4.2 ofNCWA the eligibility condition must be fulfilled and in the case of the concerned person Sri Arjun Bhuia failed to produced necessary documents from the Mukhiya of the village Panchayet duly accepted by the B.D.O. in support ofhis claim for consideration for his employment under compassionate ground as per provision of NCWA - 2 . They have submitted that management was justified in rejecting the claim of the concerned workman /person and prayer has been madeto pass an Award holding the action of the management in not providing employment to Arjun Bhuia asjustified.

4.Both the sides have filed their respective rejoinders admitting and denying the contents of some of the paras ofeach other's Written Statement.

"A. Employee'sProvident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952- Ss . 6-A 6 and 5 - D -Employees Pension Scheme, 1995-Paras 12 and 17 -A - Pension-Entitlement to-Date of superannuation-Proper evidence regarding date of birth for the purpose of computing the date of superannuation, held, is the entry in the records of the employer company and not the entries in the records ofthe Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ( Commissioner) Hence, a worker who according to the records of the employer company continued to work and contribute to the Fund till her date of superannuation on a date subsequent to the coming into operation of the Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995 on 1-4-1993 and whose contributions were so accepted beyond the alleged superannuation date, held, eligible for pension , notwithstanding that according to the records of the Commissioner her alleged date of superannuation preceded the date of commencement of the Scheme-Further held , pension claim of such a worker onthebasis ofthe entries in the employer's records would not amount to seeking belated correction of the date of birth in the Commissioner's records . "

Thismatter refers regarding Pension .

5. In order to substantiate their case of the workman side has produced and examined Arjun Bhuia, the concerned porson as WW- 1 who has proved document marked as Ext . W - 1 and W - 2 . Management also produced Sachidanand Singh who has been examined as MW- 1 and proved documents marked as Ext . M- 1 and M-2 .

8. Ld . Counsel for the workman referred to a decision . reported in 2005 (3 ) JLJR page 160 in which Hon'ble High Court of Jharkhand laid down the following :-

6. Ld . Counsel for the management argued that the concerned workman Arjun Bhuia applied very late after thedeath ofhis father Dhukhal Bhuia. So at belated stage he could not be considered for compassionate appointment. Inthis respect Ld. Counsel for the workman argued that Arjun Bhuia was minor at the time ofdeath ofhis father so hehad not applied for employment and Ld. Counsel for the

" Service-Law-Compassionate appointment- rejection of application on the ground that petitioner's name was not entered in the service book - in many cases the competent authority do not apply their mind and never 1895

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Kaushilla Bhuini his named has been shown as son and age as 21 years and also as per Ext . W- 2 he has been shown as son of Kaushilla Bhuini . In this respect . Ld. Counsel for the workman argued that Regional Labour Commissioner (C) has issued this letter regarding payment of gratuity of deceasedBhukhal Bhuia to Arjun Bhuia as Legal heir .

realise the difficulties of those dependants who starve because of the death of bread - earner - rejection of application by the competent authority on the ground that her name was not entered in the service book though she was admitted the legally married wife of the deceased is absolutely illegal, arbitrary , capricious and whimsical- respondents directed to immediately take a decision giving compassionate appointment to petitioner ."

In another decision reported in 2005 (3 ) JLJR page 190 their Lordships of the Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court laid down the following: -

11. Ld. Counsel for the management argued that he has not filed any paper showing that he is the son of late Bhukhal Bhuia. In this respect Ld. Counsel for the workman argued that he never resided at his native village and he used to live with his father at Angarpathra Colliery of BCCL, Dhanbad, but he has not filed any paper regarding the certificate ofbirth showing son of Bhukhal Bhuia and also Voter's list, Ration Card have not been filed.

"Labour and Industrial Law- Compassionate appointment- para 9-5-0 N.C.W. A.VI those who are minors at the time when their parents in employment die, should be provided with employment once they attain Majority-Scheme does not indicate that a minor has to apply within six months from the date of the deceased- petitioner's case to be re -considerd. "

Ld. Counsel for the workman also referred to another decision reported in 2005 ( 105) FLR 1067 in which Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down the following: -

"Industrial Disputes Act , 1947-Section 25 F-Effect of-Provisions of-To be complied with If workmen had completed 240 days ofservice-workman in their evidence had to state specifically that they had worked for 240 days- Have to prove it-Pleadings are no substitute for proof.

12. Another argument advance on behalf of the concerned workman is that his name has been found place in the Form Pen-2 of Bhukhal Bhuia because he was not born at that time but it contradicts Service Excerpts filedby the concerned workman of his mother Kaushilla Bhuini which was prepared on 8-6-87 and his date of birth was given as 21 years . It shows that he was very much born whenForm Pen -2 was issued regardig father as per Ext. N- 1 . It shows that ifhe was son of Bhukhal Bhuia his name must have been shown in the Form Pen- 2 of Bhukhal Bhuia . Moreover , there is also another ground for not applying. When he attained majority and his age was shown as 21 years in the Service Excerpt of his mother shows he was not minor at the time of death of his father Bhukhal Bhuia who died on 14-3-82 . But he has applied for employment on compassionate ground in the year 1994. It shows the malafide intention of the workman and he procured certificate from Mukhiya only after the death of his father Bhukhal Bhuia and then applied for compassionate appointment . Moreover , Ext . W- 1 only shows that Bhukhal Bhuia died on 14-3-82 and the concerned workman has not filed any paper regarding the payment of gratuity or P.F. of Bhukhal Bhuia to whom he alleges to be his father.

Pleadings are no substitute for proof. No workman , thus took an oath to state that they had worked for 240 days . No doucument in support of the said plea was produced. It is , therefore not correct to contend that the plea raised by the respondents herein that they have worked continuously for 240 days was deemed to have been admitted by applying the doctrine of non -traverse . In any eventhe contention of the respondents having been denied and disputed, it was obligatory on the part of the respondents to add new evidence. "

13.There is no singal paper regarding his relationship offather withBhukhal Bhuia in the public records i.e. Voter's list, Ration Card, Death and Birth Certificateetc.

14. It shows that the concerned workman has not been able to prove that he was son of Bhukhal Bhuia . Therefore, on the death of Bhukhal Bhuia he could not be given compassionate appointment by the management .

15. In the result , the following Award is rendered: - 9. In this respect concerned workman WW- 1 has stated " I have filed certificate from Local M.L.A. My mother , Koushila Bhuini was working as wagon loader . I have filed service excerpt of my mother in which my name finds place." In this respect Ld. Counsel for the management argued that the concerned workman has applied for appointment onthe ground ofdeath of his father Bhukhal Bhuia. In this respect WW- 1 stated in cross - examination at page - 2 " So far none has received money payble on account of provident fund and pension of my father. " It shows that he has not received money payable on account of provident fund and pension as son of his deceased father so that it can be presumed that he was his son .

"The action of the management of Angarpathra Colliery ofM /s . BCCL in not offering employment to Sri Arjun Bhuia Ex- W/ Loader under para 9-4-2 of NCWA is justified. Consequently, Arjun Bhuia is not entitled to get any relief."

H. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer 10. Ld. Counsel for the workman argued that in the Service Excerpt of the concerned workman's mother 1896

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 18, 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART I SEC. 3 (ii) ) नई दिल्ली , 16 मार्च , 2009

sub-section ( 1 ) and sub -section (2A) of Section 18 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:-

का.आ. 1012, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण्म में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैं. बी.सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधमंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय संख्या-1, नाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. - 135/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/428 /97 - आईधार(श्री-1)

"KyaNational Coal Workers Congress ki mang ki S/Shri Damodar Prasad Saw, Prem Chand PoddarAVM Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar ko Category-IVseCatogory-V mein Padonnat kiya Jai Ukt Pad ke Liye Karmakaron ki Patrta, Yogyata, Cadre Scheme AVM Chayan Vidhi Ityadi ke Anuroop Hain ? Yadi Haan to Karmakaron kis Ranhat ke Patra Hain Tatha kis Tarikh se?"

स्नेह लवा जकास , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 16th March , 2009

S.O. 1012.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Rof. Nó.135/2000) ofthe CentralGovernment Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, No. 1, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute betweon the employers in relation to the management of M/s.B.C.C. Ltd. and their workman, whichwas received by the Central Government on 16-3- 2009.

[No. L-20012/428/97-IR(C-1)] SNEH LATA JAWAS , DeukOfficer

ANNIEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. L, DHANBAD.

Inthe matter ofa reference U/s . 10( 1 ) (d) (2A) of 1.D. Act .

ReferenceNo. 135of2000

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Moonidih Area of M/s . B.C.C. Ltd.

AND

Their workmen

Present: Shri H. M. Singh , Presiding officer.

2. Written statement has been filed on behalf of the concerned workmen stating that S/Shri Damodar Pd . Saw, Prem Chand Podder and Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar have boonwerking since long at Moonidih Project as Mechanical Fitters to the entire satisfaction of their superiors and put in unblemished record of service . Damodar Pd. Saw entered inCat. IV on 12-9-85 , Prem Chand Poddar on 15-11-86 and lshwar Chandra Vidyasagar on 12-8-86. All the three werlumen, apart from marticulates , are I.T.I. basis were offered employment in Mechanical Grade by BCCL . The D.P.C. was held in the year 1995 and the concerned workmen were superseded by their juniors , namely, Janardan Prasad, BhimGorian, Angad Singh and Ram Jatan Saw, who were prometed in Cat .V as Mechanical Fitter on 19-5-95. The concerned workmen were placed higher in promotion in Cat. IV then Janardan Pd . and others in order of seniority. TheCadre Scheme formulated by JBCCI for promotion from Cat. IVto V is on the basis of seniority-cum-merit . The members of D.P.C. formulated their own norms for promotionbye -passing the main cadre scheme, formulated by JBCCI . The concerned workmen were not informed about their poor performance /unfitness by the management , before or after D.P.C. result was declared in May, 1999. The D.P.C. was a farce and only aneye -wash to promote blue eyed boys of the management . The management did not seek clarification from JBCCI to deviate from the well established norms laid down i.e. promotion on the basis of seniority-cum-merit . The management took unilateral decisionby formulating their own norms, thereby, APPEARANCES

Shri H. Nath,

Forthe Employers

Advocate.

For the Workmen :

Shri S. C. Gour, Advocate.

State: Jharkhand.

Industry:Coal.

modified/relaxed criteria for promotion to juniors , when gonoral candidates were to be promoted and were available. The management used offending criteria for promotion thereby using pick and choose policy to suit their convenience in abuse of colourable exercise of powers , resulting in victimisation of the eligible candidates . So, it has been prayed that the concerned workmen are entitledto bepromoted from 1995 and also wages due to each ofthem .

Dated, the 23rd February, 2009

AWARD

3. The management has filed written statement stating that the present is not maintainable both on law and facts of the case . The concerned workmen are permanent employees ofMoonidih project . Damodar Pd. Shaw and Prem Chand Poddar obtained less mark than Janardan Prasad and others in the D.P.C. conducted for 2. By order No. L- 20012/428/97 - IR(C-I ) dated 28-2-2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of 1897

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

एल .के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औधोगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय संख्या -1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं.-178/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/ 153/2001- आईआर ( सी -1 ) ] promotion in category-V . Janardan Prasad and others were promoted as per recommendation of D.P.C. and the concernedworkmen were not promoted as D.P.C. did not recommend their names for promotion . In this connection it is submitted that out of90 candidates eligible for promotion only 28 have been promoted . The concerned workmen are not entitled for promotion in cat . - V as they were not found suitable by D.P.C. and they are not entitled to any relief.

स्नेह लता जवांस , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 16th March, 2009 In rejoinder it has been stated by the management that the D.P.C. did not find the concerned workmen fit for promotion in category- V and such there was no question of supersession as others were promoted on the basis of recommendation of the D.P.C. which recommended the names of 28 candidates out of 90 eligible candidates . So, they are not entitled for any promotion and back wages.

4. Rejoinder to the written statement filed by the management, the concerned workmen have admitted some facts and denied some facts stated in the management's written statement .

S.O. 1013. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 178/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, No. I-Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s.B.C.C. Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 16-3-2009.

[No. L-20012/ 153/2001 - IR(C-1 ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer 5. The concerned workmen have produced WW- 1 who has proved documents Exts . W-1, W- 1 / 1 , W-2 and W-2/ 1.

ANNEXURE

Themanagement has produced MW - 1 -Nand Kishore Jhawho has proved documents as Ext . M - 1 to M-5 .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD

In the matter ofa reference U/s, 10( 1 ) (d) ( 2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Reference No. 178 of2001

Parties:Employers in relation to the management of Kustore Area of M/ s . B.C.C. Ltd.

AND

Theirworkmen Present : Shri H. M. Singh , Presiding officer .

APPEARANCES

For the Employers

Shri H. Nath, Advocate.

Shri S. C. Gour, Advocate .

For the Workmen :

6. The concerned workmen , Damodar Prasad Shaw (WW- 1 ) has stated in cross -examination that markings are made in DPC on the basis ofexperience , confidential report and trade test . It is true that by order dated 30-12-2000 . I have already been promoted in category-V . Likewise the two other concerned workmen have also been promoted in category-V. It shows that they have been promoted in category- V and it has also been admitted in cross- examination at page 2 that D.P.C. marks on the basis of exprience and confidential report and trade test . The documents filed by the management Exts . M- 1 to M- 5 show that the marking has been done by D.P.C. and after considering performance of each person 28 persons have been promoted and there also mark given regarding experience, trade test and confidential report and on that basis promotion was made by the management . It shows that the management has promoted 28 persons, as per cadre scheme after D.P.C. , who were found eligible seeing their confidential report, experience and trade test.

State : Jharkhand .

Industry: Coal .

Dated, the 24th February , 2009 7. In the result, the demand of the concerned workmen isnot justified and they are not entitled to any relief.

AWARD

This is my Award. H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 16 मार्च , 2009

By order No. L- 20012 / 153 /2001 - IR(C - I) dated 10-8-2001 the Central Government in the Ministry ofLabour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d ) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of the का.आ. 1013.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी.सी.सी.

1330 G1/09-21 1898

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 18, 2000/CHAITRA 28, 1931

[PART II-Sec. 3 (ii )] Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following dispatc for adjudication to this Tribunel :

workman and premature superannuation from the service ofthe company 8 years ahead ofactual date of retirement is not only bad in law but also unfair and unjustified. Under the circumstances it has been paid that an award be passed in favour of the workman by directing the management to continue the concerned workman in service till1-7-2009with fall backwages.

"Whether the action of the management of BCCL, KustereArea in not accapting the dutc ofbirth of Sh . Sahadev Dhari , driver as year 1949 as recorded service in his original service records is just, fair & legal ? If not to what relief is theworkman entitled?"

3. Written statement has been filed on behalfofthe management stating that the concerned workman is and employee ofKustore Area and working as Driver . He came on transfer from Burriladih colliery to Auto workshop, Kustore in the year 1996. In Frem ' B' Register ofBerriladih colliery his date ofbirth is recorded as 1941 , i.e. 1-7-1941 , which has been awthenticated by him by putting his signature in the relevant column of Form ' B ' Register , which is a statutory register . The same date of birth is recended in all statutory records. The Members , Central Executive Committee, Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh vide letter dated 23-6-1998 raised an industrial dispute regarding his age for the first time . Vide letter dated 1-8-2000 the Dy. Chief Personnel Manager; Kustore Area explained the feats ofthe case and prayed for its rejection. The present reference is out come of this dispute . It has alsobeen stated that the concerned workman filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble High Court of Jharkhandwhich has been registered as case No. 992/2001 . Before raising the diapute beforethe A.L.C. ( C) , Dhanbad on 23-6-98 the concerned workman never objected to the management nor reised any dispute regarding his age. Since he was appointed in 1972, the raising ofdispute on 23-6-98 after delay of more than 26 years makes the demand a stale demand, which is not maintainable in view of various decisionsoftheHon'ble Supreme Court and High Courts .

In rejoinder the management has stated in Form 'B ' register is daly authenticated by the concerned workman, his date ofbirth bas beas recorded as 1941 and not 1949 as claimed by the union. It has been prayed that the Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to pass the award that the action of the management of Kustore Area in not accepting the date ofbirth ofSahdev Dhari , Driver as year 1949 is just , fair and legal and the concerned workman is not entitled to anyrelief.

Rejoinder has been filed by the concerned workman in which it has been denied that the reference is not maintainable. Other things are repetition of facts which have been stated in written statement. It has been stated that the reference is made as per order of Hon'ble Jharkhand High Courtat Ranchi .

2. The concerned workman has filed written statement stating that, Sahadeo Dhari was appointed on 17-10-1971 and in all the records ofthe establishment his date of birth was recorded as 1949 including Forn 'B' Register ofBurragarh colliery. Identity Card was issued to him inMarch, 1973by BCCL management and in the colaien ofdate ofbirth 1949 is reflected. In the yder 1967 he was issued service excerpt mentioning the same date of birth 1949 and the workman rightly returned one capy of the service excerpt to the employer by sstaining one copy himself, as per guidelines issued in this regard and without raising any dispute in the matter of age etc. The age recorded at the time of employment in the year 1971 was carried over by the management from 1971 to 1998 when date ofbirth was arbitrarily changed by the management ofKustore colliery after transfer ofthe concerned workman fromBurriladih project. Earlier in the yung 1974 the workman was transferred by the management of Burragark to Burriladih project and service excerpt issued by the management ofBurriladih shows date ofbirth as 1949. In the year 1998 when the wrong recording of age of concerned workman, for the finst time came to thenotice of the workman he protested to the management of Murilladih Colliery. Management of Murilladih Colliery wrote a letter to the management ofBurragarh and the manager, Burragarh Colliery informed the Manager , Burilladih on 14-12-98 that age/date of birth as per record ofthecolliery is 1949. Even on receipt of clarification from Burragarh management, the management of burilindi delayed in restoring the matter, on one excuse or the other and also did not settle the matter. Thereater a dispute wasraised before the A.L.C. (C), Dhanbad, only to harass the workman for various reasons . The meangement of Burilladih colliery instead of solving/correcting date of birth on the basis of Form ' B ' of Burragach colliery , transferred his services to another Unit i.e. Kustere colliery toharass the concerned werkenan . The harassment to the concerned workman did not end there only, but the management of Kustore of BCCL superannuated him prematurelly w.e.f. 1-7-2001 instead of allowing him to continue in service upto 1-7-2009 as per date of birth recorded in Form' B ' and other acords ofBurragach colliery at the time ofhis initial appointment. Once age-recorded a the time of initial appointment and reflects in all the othor statutory records of the said colliery cannot be changed by the employer. Changing date ofbirth on the back of the at

4. In this respect the concerned workman has produced WW-1 Sahadeo Dhari who has proved documents Exts . W- 1 to W- 3 . The management has produced MW- 1 Anirudh Jha who has proved Exts . M - 1 and 16-2 and managensent also produced MW -2 Bairam Singh.

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

5. The main argument advanced on behalf of the workman is that date of birth has been recorded in the colliery as 1949 and not 1941. In this respect the concerned workman has stated in cross -examination that " In the year 1976 I was transferred from Burragarh colliery to murralidih colliery. I signed on Form 'B ' Register in which date of birth has been shown as 1941. " He also stated " I have got no paper to show that my date of birth is 1949. " It shows that he has admitted his date ofbirth as 1941and he has signed Form 'B ' Register when he was transferred fromBurragarh to Burralidih colliery.

6. Documents have been filed by the concerned workman. Ext. W- 1 shows that there is manipulation in the figure '9 ' . It shows ' 1941 ' has been made ' 1949 ' . This also corroborates paper which has been filed by Sahadeo Dhari in which his date of birth seems to be done from 1941 to 1949. Moreover , the concerned states that he was driver and he was appointed as driver, but he has not filed any paper i.e. driving licence which shows date of birth . It shows that his date of birth is of the year 1941 and he has knowingly not filed driving licence for getting employment as driver with the management. Moreover, when he has admitted in cross -examination that when he was transferred from Burragarh colliery to Hurralidih colliery his date of birthwas mentioned in Form ' B ' Register as 1941 and he has got no paper to show that his date of birth is 1949. It onlyshows his date of birth as 1941 because not filing of driving licence . The concerned workman signed Form ' B ' Register being a literate person wher. he was transferred from Burragarh colliery to Hurralidih colliery where his date ofbirth has been mentioned as 1941 by manipulating it from 1941 to 1949 because one can easily alter and manipulate ' 9 ' in English .

7. In view of discussions made above I come to the conclusion that the action of the management of BCCL, KustoreArea in not accepting the date of birth of Sahadeo Dhari, Driver, as year 1949, as recorded in his original service records , is justified and the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief.

In the above manner the award is passed. H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 16 मार्च , 2009

का.आ. 1014.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय संख्या-1, धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सं.121/1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/57/96- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

1899 New Delhi , the 16th March , 2009

S.O. 1014.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.121 / 1997) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court No. I , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers inrelation to the management of M/ s . C.C. Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 16-3-2009.

[No. L-20012/57/96- IR(C- I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.0.1,1, DHANBAD.

Inthematter ofa reference U/s . 10( 1 ) ( d) (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act. Reference No. 121 of 1997

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Govindpur Project of M/ s . C.C. Ltd. AND Theirworkmen

Present : Shri H. M. Singh , Presiding officer. APPEARANCES

For the Employers : Shri D. K. Verma, Advocate Forthe Workmen : Shri B. N. Singh , Advocate.. State : Jharkhand.

Industry: Coal Dated, the 26th February, 2009 AWARD

By Order No. L - 20012 / 57 / 96 - IR( C - I ) dated 1-5-97 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d ) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

"Whether the demand by the Union that the management of Govindpur Project of M / s . Central Coalfields Ltd. is required to fix the pay of piece- rated workers , S/Shri Islam Ansari and 262 others (asper Annexure) in time- rated categories only after protecting the piece rated wages and SPRA is legal and justified ?" 1900

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28, 1931

ANNEXURE

TicketNo.

Sl . No. Name ofEmployee

3 1.

2072 Sri Islam Ansari

2071 SriBaiju Ram

2427 3. Sri Bishnu Ganjhu

2014 Sri Babuchand Manjhi

2168 SriButiya

2166 6. Sri AntuGope

2091 Sri Mohan Mahto

2167 8. Sri FaguMahto

2037 Sri Raj Kishore

2190 10. Sri Sannu Mahto

2261 11. SriDaulatGanjhu

12. Sri Immanuddin

2323

2142 13. Sri Ishwar Mahto

2361 14. Sri Esraful Ansari

2507 15. Sri Rahman Mia

2059 16. Sri Manjilal Mahto

2356 17. Sri Bhikhu Mahto

2636 18. Sri HaneefMia

2079 19. Sri Mahesh Rabidas

20. Sri Sakra Mahto

2330 21.

2351 Sri Khakgpat Mahto

2158 22. Sri Radha Kishun

23.

2159 Sri Mohan

24.

2343 Sri Jugal Mahto

25.

2354 Sri Mukhtar Ansari

26.

2161 Sri Jaggu

2068 27. Sri Birbal Manjhi

28. Sri Parmeshwar Mahtu

2045 29.

2309 Sri Kailash Mandal

Sri Satar Mian

2865 30.

Sri Itwari Mahuli

2696 31.

32. Sri Harilal Mahto

2286 33. Sri Bihal Rabidas

2285

2729 34. Sri Ramdhani Mahto

2363 35. Sri Ganesh Singh

36.

2380 Sri Dineshwar Mahto

[PART II-SEC. 3( i) ] 1

3 37.

2381 Sri Sarju Mahto

38. Sri Mamtaz

2699 39. Sri Sukhram Munda

2870 40.

2887 Sri Nikhil Munda

41.

2378 Sri BasudeoBhuiyan

42. SriNasiruddin

2602 43.

2131 Sri Ruplal Mehto

44.

2840 Sri Manjilal Mehto

45.

2613 Sri Mahendra Prasadh

2711 46. SriAliMia

47.

2394 Chandu Singh

48.

2315 Sri Birsa turi

Sri Kartik Hazam

49.

2627 50.

2657 SriDheraj Misr

51 . Sri Mahesh Rabidas

2612 52. Sri Birsahi Chamar

2546

2693 53. Sri Dilchand Teli

2668 54. Jasim Mia

2658 55. SriHariMeshi

2843 56. SriArbind Singh

2938 57. Sri Ritlal Turi

2896 58. RiyasMia

2848 Sri Teleshwar Mehto

59.

2900 Sri Hemlal Mehto

60.

61.

2303 Sri Rajkummar Bouri

2336 62. Sri Ramchandra Prajapati

63.

2901 Sri Parsadi Sao

2899 64. Sri Chhakam Mehto

2340 65. Sri Dhaniram Mehto

66.

2338 Sri Khirodhar Mehto

67.

2358 Sri Somar Mehto

2428 68. Sri Sukar Mallah

2445 69 . Sri Sukar Mehto

70.

2706 Sri Gaisuddin

71.

2332 Sri Rameshwar Prajapati

2234 72. Sri Tahir Hussain

2335 73. Sri Rati Mehto

74.

2429 Sri TulsiGanjhu 1901

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3 1

2461 75. Sri DaseManjhi

2530 76. Sri Sukro Orasen

2039 Sri Lakshman Prasad

77.

2134 78. Sri Sunder Singh

2187 79. Sri Ghanshyam Rajak

2095 80. Sri FalguniMasem

2468 81. Sri Ram Naresh

2169 Sri Nasruddin Ansari

82.

2786 83. Sri Md. Rayuf

2292 84. Sri Motilal Kewat

2283 85. Sri Balgovind Ravidas

2042 86. Sri Raju Prasad

2353 87. Sri Govind Mehto

2357 88. Sri Narayan Mehto

2845 Sri Nasib Mian

89.

2506 90. Sri Bisan Karmali

2136 91. Sri Moti Ram

2593 Sri Janki Mehto

92.

2586 93. Sri Basdeo Mahuli

2571 94. Sri Baleshwar Mahto

2368 95. Sri Lakho Mehto

2694 96. Sri Tuntun Hasan

2770 97. Sri Basdeo Mehto

2771 Sri Aziz Mia

98.

2411 Sri Gantur Munda

99.

2088 100. Sri Rameshwar Mehto

2254 Sri Mathura Rabidas

101.

2415 102. Sri Banshi Singh

2034 Sri Kirat Mehto

103.

2659 Sri Laxman Mehto

104.

2712 105. Sri Alisen Sekh

2141 106. SriMoti Gope

2248 Sri Bendhen Mehto

107.

2183 Sri Ramn Munda

108.

2954 Sri Jainath

109.

2044 Sri Sonaram Mehto

110.

2064 Sri Nanu Mehto

111 .

2350 Sri Khaita Sao

112.

3 1

2274 113. Sri Bigan Manjhi

2284 114. Sri KartikMehto

2715 115. Sri BenjaminAind

2722 116. Sri Jagdish Mehto

2759 117. Surmali Mis

2713 Bhukhan Mehto

118.

2721 Sri Jabir Mia

119.

2732 120. Sri Raghunath Bhuihar

2061 121 . Sri Rameshwar Bhuiya

2384 Sri Amar nath

122.

2041 123. Sri Lakhi Mahto

2700 124. Sri Yusuf Ansari

2397 125. Sri Nirmal Meshi

2034 126. Sri Ramkumar Prajapati

2337 127. Sri SanuGope

2446 128. Sri Sambhu Mahto

2872 129. Sri MajahimMian

2022 Sri Harilal Kumar

130.

2134 131. Sri Ram Das Bhuiyam

2096 132. Sri Lusi Mahto

2836 Sri Madusudan Barhi

133.

2815 134. SriBiharilal Nayak

2417 135. SriRuplal

2888 Sri Rameshwar

136.

2038 137. SriBhagtu Sao

2126 138. Sri Laldeo Singh

2150 139. Sri Chandrika Prasad Mahto

2355 140. Sri Tekaman Mahto

2402 141. Sri Ram Das

2804 142. Sri Rathe

2621 143 . Sri Nakul Mahuli

2452 144. SriAsgar

2734 145. Sri Ram Pyare Khuihar

2697 Sri Alibakash

146.

2594 Sri Asruddin

147.

2731 148. Sri Rameshwar Bhiyan

2203 149. Sri Jagdish

2345 Sri Narilal Sao

150 .

1902

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 18, 2000/CHAITRA 28, 1931

3 151. Sri Anant Mahto

2907 152. Sri SatarMia

2999 153. Sri Azad Akhtar

2388 154. Sri Ram Kishan Dusadh

2276 155. Sri Fulehand Mahto

2999 156.

2144 SriBigan Rabidas

157.

2267 Sri Bholi Mahto

158.

2483 Sri Rajkumar Yadav

159.

2362 Sri Sahban Ansari

160.

2058 Sri Rajesh Bhuiyan

161.

2060 Sri Kisberi Singh

162. Sri Harilal Pandit

2787 163. Sri Mahendra Mahto

2047 164. Sri Jamaluddin

2790 165.

2825 Sri Lakho keiry

2617 166. Sri Chetlal Mahto

167.

2160 Sri Mahabir Manjhi

168.

2449 Sri Dasrath Bhagat

169. Sri Md. Khalil

2181 170. SriPrasuram

2326 171. Sri Shankar Mahto

2140 172. Sri Karu Chamar

2597 173. Sri Khursid Alam

2813 174.

2127 Sri RajuDusadh

175. Sri Pelus Lakara

2040 176.

2063 Sri Dasrath Manjhi

177. Sri Mahabir Mahto

2369 178 . Sri Dildar Mian

2874 179.

2879 Sri Ram Sewak Singh

180. Sri Kamruddin

2724 181 . Sri Sukhen Paul

2321 182. Sri Dasrath Mahto

2367 183. Sri Binod Kumar

2849 Sri Sitaram

184.

2511 185.

2483 Sri Fulchand Tatwa

186.

2656 Sri Dwarika Mistry

187.

2149 Sri Narendra Sharma

188.

2152 Sri Gajendra Mahto

[PART SEC. 3(16)] 1

3 199. Sri Md. Muslim

2164 190.

2322 Sri Ransayan

191. Sri Sakru Mahto

2003 192. Sri Johwar Lal Mahto

2344 193. Sri SahabuddinMia

2690 194.

2963 Sri Rajendra Kumar Das

195.

2607 Sợi ĐinjuManjhi

196.

2148 Sri Jagdish

197.

2478 Sri Awadhesh Mistry

196.

2333 Sri Fulendra Prajapati

199.

2067 Sri Sukhdeo Manjhi

200. Sri Sanichar Munda

2614 201.

2189 SriJyoti Bouri

202. Sri Lukman Mia

2497 203.

2591 SriJamunaGope

2766 204. Sri RaghuModi

205. Sri Etwa Munda

2133 206. Sri Semara- II

2317 297.

2542 Sri Salim Ansari

208.

2850 Sri KathinaBhuiya

209.

2545 Sri Teklal Mahto

210.

2113 SriBishwanath Beldar

211.

2860 Sri Sitaram Singh

212.

2736 Sri Ram Autar Dewar

213. Sri R. Maridas

2033 214.

2180 Sri Tufani Singh

215.

2404 Sri RamjeeNanis

216. Sri Lallu Nomia

2774 217. Sri Suresh Kumar Ram

2789 218. Sri Ali Mohammad

2553 219.

2513 Sri Rajendra Ram

220. Sri Rameshwar

2201 221. Sri Lakhan Ram

2289 222.

2510 Sri Rajendra Rewani

223. Sri Subash Kumar Kahar

2826 224.

2491 SriRajaRam Sao

225 .

2585 SriGoKabiraj

226.

2456 Sri Nageshwar Mahto [ भाग II- खण्ड ( ii) ]

227 . Sri Ashim Mohammad 228. Sri Ram Prakash Singh 229. SriMd. Asad

230. Sri Ram Nandan

231. Sri Amrit Mahto

232. Sri Ganesh Sundhi 233 . Sri AmritMurmu

234. Sri PremGanjan

235. SriMajrulHaque 236. Sri Ishwar Paswan 237. Sri Ram Dhani Ram 238. Sri Kishun Lal Yadav 239. Sri Badruddin

240. SriKrishna

241. Sri RamAutar

242. Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh 243. SriDwarika Singh 244. SriTajuddinMia

245. SriBalgovindNayak 246. SriTileshwar Prajapati 247. SriNisan Singh

248. Sri Prahlad Kumar Chati 249. Sri Churawan Mahto 250. Sri Jhawan Mahto 251. Sri Loknath Mahto 252. Sri Gopinath Manjhi 253. Sri Harbhajan Singh 254. Sri Shyama Mahto 255. Sri Tejlal Mahto

256. Sri Chunilal Mahto 257. Sri Churaman Ganjhu 258. Sri Budhan Chamar 259. Sri Tulshi Gope

260. SriNiyamatMia

261. Sri Mallu Mahto

Sri Alimuddin

262.

263. Sri Salik Mahto

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

1903 3

2379

2035

2499

2469

2342

2385

2153

2450

2611

2138

2410

2282

2501

2453

2463

2505

2466

2387

2401

2457

2634

2479

2769

2001

2007

2. As per written statement of the workmen it has been stated that Islam Ansari and 262 other workinen are time- rated category workmen, working from piece- rate to time- rate ofGovindpur Project of M/ s . C.C. Ltd. They have been converted from piece - rate to time- rate and after conversion into time- rate , they were regularised in time- rate not in proper category as per nature of their work and designation required for the same between 1994 and onwards . It has been stated that the concerried workmen after their conversion into time - rate from the dates of their respective conversion , were placed in time-rated category and the management started them paying initial starting basic pay/wages of Category- 1 prescribed for time- rate . As per NCWA - IV they were legally required to be placed in their respective time -rated categories prescribed for their respective designation as per nature of their work andwere to be paid their respective pay/wages fixing their pay/wages in their respcetive categories after protecting their pay/wages alongwith S.P.R.A. payable to them immediately before their respective conversion in time rate which the management disregarding rule , violating provisions ofpayment of wages Act, 1936 , relevant NCWA and Certified Standing Orders denied to give them. The issue relating to fixation of the pay of the concerned workmen in time- rate in their respective time-rate categories asper nature of their work and designation prescribed for the same by protecting their respective piece - rated pay/ wages including SPRA payable to them immediately before their conversion in time-rate remained under discussion for long but the management did not fix their respective pay/wages including SPRA on some pretext or the other. It has been stated contrary to para 5 in respect of the concerned workmen figuring in the present , case , the management in totally similar nature ofdispute pending in C.G.I.T. No. 2, Dhanbad arising out ofReference No. 209/ 87 entered into settlement with the union ' united Coal Workers Union' on the basis of which an Award was passed by CGIT No. 2, Dhanbad in Reference No. 209/87.

2024

2026

2048

2098

One of the terms of the aforesaid compromise settlement speaks interalia that in general , such cases will be settled in Central Coalfields Ltd. On the basis of the terms of compromise settlement which was submitted in the aforesaid Industrial Tribunal . Other terms of the settlement are enumerated in sub-parás.

2097

2101

2298

2021

(a) P. R. Group wages including SPRA ifpaid before 1-1-86 to the concerned workmen figring in Ref. No. 209/ 87will be protected in the daily rated category in which the concernedworkmen figuring in Ref. No. 209/87 placed from the date in Daily rated category.

2032

2050

2023

(b) After fixing the basic pay of the concerned workmen figuring in Ref. No. 209/87 in the manner stated in sub-para (a) above, the basic pay of the concerned workmenwill bedetermined by granting annual increments and fixation under NCWA- IV as on 1-1-90 and the 2089 1904

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :APRIL 18 , 2009/ CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] concerned workmen will be deemed to have been regularised in their respective daily rated category/ pay scale w.e.f. 1-1-90.

workers , S/Shri Islam Ansari and 262 others in time- rated categories onlyafter protecting the piece -rated wages and SPRA is legal and justifed and the concerned workmen are legally entitled to receive arrears on account of their wages and other consequential benefits .

(c) Consequent to the fixation of workmen w.e.f. 1-1-90 as per sub-para (a) and (b) above , the concerned workmen will be paid arrears from 1-1-90 till now i.e. 20-5-92 by granting them annual increments and theywill continue subsequently in such pay scale and with such fixation of pay and consequential benefits of annual increments and allowances as perNCWA- IV.

(d)Arrears as referred in sub -para (c) will bepaidby themanagement to the concerned workmen, 72 in number, within three months from the date ofaccepting ofthe joint compromise petition by the Hon'ble Tribunal.

It has also been stated by the concerned workmen that in this regard the management agreed with the sponsoring union figuring in Ref. No. 209/87 to protect the pay/wages ofpiece- rated workers in their respective categories while fixing their respective pay/wages after their conversion from piece -rate to time -rated categories and in the event of delay the management will grant them arrears of wages by allowing them benefit of annual increments for the delayed period.

3. The management has filed written statement stating that the piece -rated workers remain in Group - I and they are paidwages ofdifferent groups according to nature ofjobs perfonmed by them and the quantity of work load given by them . Thus , the piece- rated wages will become variable dependings upon the deployment of piece - rated workers on different kinds of piece -rated jobs. It has also been submitted that whenever the piece-rated workers are engaged on the jobs like cutting and loading coal, they are paid the highest group wages of Group VA whereas when they perform the jobs ofclay cartrige maker or any other general cutting job like earth cutting, they get the Group- I wages. They get group - III wages while in the opencast workings as overburden remover. They are required to give the minimum work load prescribed for such group so as to enable them to earn group wages . The concerned workmen were initially recruited as piece- rated workers and they are entitled for Group- 1 wages as the management cannot pay them less than that but they may get higher grade wages whenever they are deployed ondifferent kinds ofjobs at different periods of time and they give different work load according to the nature of jobs and facilities available for executing such job . Whenever any piece- rated worker is converted to time rated category, he is to be put as general mazdoor in Category- I which is equivalent to Group- I and he is regularised in a particular time - rated jobs on the basis of the skill possessed by him and on the basis ofhis efficiency in performance of time rated jobs of different kinds . Whenever any time rated worker having put as general mazdoor in Category - 1 , is deployed as helper to the mechanical fitter or to electrician, he gets category- Il wages and on being promoted, he gets category-III wages . If he isregularised as fitter by virtue ofpossessing knowledge and skill and efficiency, he may get category- IV wages as well. Ifhe is capable ofpassing the Wireman certificate, he may be put as electrician and he may get category- IV wages . The concerned workmen were piece- rated workers and as such, they were entitled to Group I wages and, accordingly, they were put as general mazdoor in time rated jobs in Category- I at the time initial stage . After getting certain training and performing certain jobs they acquire skill and were promoted to different categories jobs and, accordingly, they were fixed on different categories according to nature ofjobs performed by them. Ithas been stated that the management has properly fixed the concernedworkmen according to the rules of fixation It has also been stated that when the demand of sponsoring union for fixing wages of the concerned workmen in time rate by protecting their wages paid in piece- rate immediately before their conversion in time-rate was not settled by the management inspite of their long requests, the sponsoring union was left with no other alternative than to raise industrial dispute before A.L.C. (C), Hazaribagh, who tried his best to get the dispute settled asper rule andbased on the joint commpromise filed in Ref. No.209/87 referred to above , but the management didnot settle the dispute in conciliation and on failure of conciliation, the Government ofIndia, Ministry of Labour has referredthedispute for adjudication to this Tribunal . Ithas been stated that the action of the management in notgiving protection ofwages to the concerned workmen figuring in the dispute connected with the above reference while fixing their wages at the time oftheir conversion in time rate as per nature of their work and respective designations prescribed for the same is unjustified besides being illegal and suffers from vice ofdiscrimination with them in as much as that in totally similar nature of case, the management gave benefit of fixation of wages and other consequential benefits after conversion of 72 workmen figuringin Ref. No. 209/87 in time- rate by giving them protection of wages drawn by them in piece-rate before their conversion in time- rate as stated above . Under the facts and circumstances stated above, the demandby the union that the management of Govindpur Project of M/s. E.C. Ltd. is required to fix the pay of piece- rated भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

and the claim ofthe workmen have no merit at all and they are not entitledto any relief.

Inrejoinderthe management has stated more or less same things as have been stated in the written statement. It has been stated that the settlement referred by the sponsoring union was relevant for the Reference No. 209/87 and in the present the said settlement is not relevant and the concerned workmen cannot claim similar right or similar privilege or similar rules of fixation. It has been prayed that the Tribunal be pleased to pass an award holding that the concerned workmen are not entitledto any relief.

4. Rejoinder to the written statement of the management has been filedby the workmen stating almost same facts which have been stated in written statement. It has been denied that the settlement referred by the sponsoringunion in Ref. No. 209/87 is not relevant for the purpose ofthe present case , and the concerned workmen cannot claim similar right or similar privilege or similar rules offixation. It has been prayed that an award be passed in favour of the workmen.

5.The concerned workmen have produced WW-1- U. K. Pandeywho has been proved Ext. W- 1 and W.W. - 2 Badruddin , one of the concerned workmen . The managernent has produced Sudipta Patra as MW - 1 to substantiate its case.

6. The main argument advanced on behalf of the workmen is that in Reference No. 209/87 there was a settlement by the same management and the workmen in which protection was given from piece- rated workers to time- rated category as per the Ext . W- 1 which has been issued on 9-5-90 it has been mentioned that M/ s . Si.C.C. Ltd. , Ranchi Headquarters agreed that piece - rated category workers be given time - rated job and their pay protection be given.

Inthis respect learned counsel of the management argued that WW- 2 , concerned workman , has stated in cross-examination at page 2 that SPRA are admissible only tothose who are working as piece - rated workers . It is true thatpiece-rated workers come within Group- I. Piece- rated workers are not heing promoted . Some of the concerned workmen are placed presently in different categories upto Category-VI. They are getting the wages of their respective categories.They are getting the annual increments also . It only shows that the management gives payment according to categories of workers and it also true that piece- rated workers are not being promoted.

WW- 1 U. K. Pandey stated that it is true that for piece - rated workers there is no promotional avenue available . If the concerned workmen would have remained as piece - rated workers they would have been in piece -rated workers . But ofcourse from time to time they would have been provided annual increments .

1330 GI /09-22

1905 MW-1-Sudipta Patra in cross - examination at page 2 that a case of time - rated workers converted from piece-ratedworkers was referred to Tribunal which was settledbythe management. It seems that the management's witness has admitted the settlement in Reference No. 209/87 inwhich piece- rated workers have been given SPRA pay protection, so the same management cannot deny anddiscriminate their workers in different way. Moreover , when there is a circular issued by M/s . S.C.C.L. Ranchi as per Ext . W- 1 for conversion of piece -rated workers to time-rated workers they should be given SPRA and pay protection and pay protection.

Itshows that the management is discriminating its workmen as it has got settlement with some ofthe workmen giving them SPRA and pay protection from piece- rated to time-rated, but they are denying the same to others.

7.By a Petition dated 31-10-2008 the workman have stated that due to delay having been made after conclusion ofthe evidence of workmen on 19-9-2002 and deleberate delay having been made by the management, a large number of workmen of the above reference are found not interested to persue their cases on account of transfer of many of them to other places or retirement of many of them in normal course or under V.R.S. and on account of death of some of them etc. such workers figure ar serial numbers 3 , 4 , 5, 7 , 13, 15, 17, 18, 20, 22, 27, 29, 30, 31 , 34,40, 42,45, 46, 48 , 49, 50, 51 , 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59, 63, 68, 69, 72, 73, 75, 76, 77, 79, 80, 83, 88, 89, 91 , 93, 94, 95, 96, 98, 99, 100, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 111 , 113, 114, 115, 117 , 118 , 119, 121 , 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 132, 133, 134, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143 , 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151 , 153, 159, 160, 162, 163 , 164, 166, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 174, 178, 179, 180, 182, 183 , 184, 191, 193, 194, 195, 197, 201, 203, 204,205, 206, 207, 208 , 211 , 212, 214, 216, 217, 218 , 219, 220, 221, 222, 223 , 224, 225, 226, 227, 229, 235 , 237, 238 , 240, 241 , 242, 243, 246 , 247 , 248 , 251 , 252, 253 , 260, 263 and they have requested to delete the names of workmen figuring against serial numbers mentioned in Annexure to Schedule ofreference .

8. In view of the above facts and circumstances discussed above, I come to the conclusion that the demand ofthe Union that the management ofGovindpur Project of M/s . Central Coal Fields Ltd. is required to fix the pay of piece- rated workers S / Sri Islam Ansari and 262 others (as per annexure) in time- rated categories only after protecting the piece-rated wages and SPRA is legal and justified. The management is directed to implement the award with retrospective effect within 30 days from the date of publication of the award , deleting the names of workmen figuring against serial numbers mentioned in the award.

This is my award.

H. N. SINGH , Presiding Officer 1906

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 18, 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-Sac. 3(ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 16 मार्च , 2009

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

"Whetherthe action of the management ofBlock- II Area ofM/s.BCCL in not referring Smt. Kaushalya Kamin for determination of her age by the medical board and superannuating her with effect from 15-9-96 is legal and justified? Ifnot, towhat relief the workman comoerned- is entitled to? " का.आ. 1015.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947, (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनसे कर्मचारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्ट औधोगिक विकार में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 290/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/ 140/2000- आई. आर ( सी.1 ) ] स्नेह लता जबास , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 16th March , 2009

S.O. 1015.--In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government herebypublishes theAward (Raf. No.290/2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. I , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 16-03-2009.

[No. L-20012/140/2000-IR(C+ I)] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

ANNEXUR

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. I, DHANBAD

Inthe matter of a reference U/ s . 10 ( 1 ) ( d) (2A) of I.D. Act.

Reference No. 290 of2000.

Parties :Employers in relation to the management of Block- II Area ofM/ s . B.C.C.Ltd.

And Their workman .

Present : Shri H. M. Singh, PresidingOfficer. APPEARANCES

For the Employers : Shri S.N. Sinha, Advocate .

For the Workman : Shri Rajiv Ranjan , Advocate .

State Jharkhand , Industry: Coal .

2. The concerned workman has filed written statement sisting that Kaushalya Kamin was a permanent employee ofBlock II Open Cast Project working there as a Wagon Loader and her date ofbirth was wrongly recorded inthe recorde ofthe management . This fact was not known toher as she is illiterate. The service excerpt which were issuedto all workmen of the Company in the year 1987 was not issued to her and as such she could not put her . objection about her wrong date ofbirth as recorded in the management's record . When she came to know about the wrong entry of her date of birth , the union was informed Mamediatelyand after receiving the information the union made an enquiry and found that the date of birth of the concerned workman has been wrongly recorded in the service record. The union demanded from the management for rectification ofdate of birth ofthe workman concerned after ascertaining the age of the workman concerned through Apex Medical Board under the provisions of Implementation Instruction No. 76 of J.B.C.C.I. The union discussed the issue along with the management in several meetings and the management gave assurance for sscertaining the age of the concerned workman. It has also been stated that the husband of Kaushlya Kamin , namely, Kalia Bhuia is also a permanent workman of M /s . BCCL and the age of her husband is 42 years, but the management superannuated the concerned workman w.e.f. 15-9-96. There is a glaring difference in the appearance of the workman concerned and the age recorded in the register ofthe management . The workman concerned has been superannuated by the management although she has not attained the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years. So the superannuation of the workman concerned is illegal and unjustified. It has been demaned that the action ofthe management in not referring the concerned workman for assessment of the age by the Medical Board and superannuating her w.e.f. 15-6-96 is illegal and unjustified . Ithas also been prayed that the management be directed to assess her age by Medical Board and to allow her to resume duty with retrospective effect with backwages.

Dated, the 26th Februray, 2009 AWARD

1.ByOrder No. L- 20012/ 140/2000- IR(C- I)dated 27-9-2000 the Central Government in the Ministry ofLabour has, in exercise of the powers conferredby clause ( d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 ofthe

3.Written statement has been filed on behalf of the management stating that the concerned workman declared her date of birth as 15-9-1936 as the time of her appointment as wagon loader. She was superannuated after attaining the age of 60 years as per provision of Certified Standing Orders of the company. As such the the action of the management in superannuating the 1907 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

assessment of her age through the Medical Board which islegal andjustified. It has been prayed that the awardbe passed in favour ofthe workman .

4. The concerned workman examined herself as WW- 1 to substantiate her case .

Themanagement has produced MW- 1 - N.L. Pandey who has proveddocuments marked Ext. M- 1 andM-2 .

concerned workman w.e.f. 15-9-96 is legal , valid and justified. It has been submitted that the concerned workman accepted her suprerannuation and after two years ofher superannuation the present dispute has been raised at the instigation of some interested persons. She made a demand for getting her age assessed by the Medical Board and on the basis of age so assessed, she wanted her date ofbirth corrected and to allow her to resume her duties after getting aside the order of superannuation . It has been submitted that the age/date ofbirth recorded in the Form 'B' Register is conclusive for deciding the time of superannuation according to the provisions of Certified Standing Orders as because the Form ' B ' Register is a statutory document maintained u/ s . 48 of the Mines Act, 1952 and the age/date ofbirth recorded in the said register ispresumed to be genuine and conclusive as per provision oflaw . The concerned lady failed to disclose any ground for sending her to the Medical Board for assessment of her age under any provision of law . The sponsoring union made an attempt to take advantage of the JBCCI Cirular No. 76 which is the procedural law to be taken into cosideration at the time of correction of the date ofbirth in case it is considered fit case for getting the age assessed by the Apex Medical Board . It has been stated that the demandmade at the fag end ofretirement for correction of date ofbirth is without any merit and the same is liable to be summarily rejected and the action of the management in refusingto referthe concerned workman to Apex Medical Board for assessment of her age with a view to correct her dateofbirth entered in the Form ' B ' Register is legal and justified.

5. The concemed Workman, WW- 1 , stated in cross- examination at page 2 " I have not filed any proofregarding making representation, one year prior to my retirement . " It only shows that at the fag end of her service , she represented to the management for correction ofher age . Inthis respectthe management has referred 2001 Lab.I.C.28 in which Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down correction of dateofbirth-controversy over , raised by employee long afterjoining service - Birth date determined by employer in accordance with service Rules or General instructions issued- No typographical or arithmetical error -No interference by the High Court in exercise ofextraordinary jurisdiction. Hon'ble Supreme Court also laid down entries made in certificate issued by school authorities and employer-whether conclusive in question of fact and correction in service record long after joining service, particularlywhen employee is on verge of retirement-Not to be accepted generally. The management also referred (2007) (113 ) FLR 104 ( Jharkhand High Court ) in which Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court laid down that the age declared by the petition at the time of appointment and recorded in Form 'B ' which was consequently over written as 21 Single Judge held it as 4-5-1952 on the basis of matriculation certificate--matriculation certificate was in the name of another person - Single Judge has erred in law indirecting to act upon over written Form 'B ' . A disputed question of fact cannot be decided in writ jurisdiction . Learned counsel of the management also referred 2007 (114) FLR 495 ( Allahabad High Court) in which Hon'ble High Court laid down that date of birth was wrongly recorded in service Book and the petitioner was illiterate lady, has not passed Higher School Examination . Her representation for correction of date of birth at the fag end ofher service not maintainable . Date of birth recorded in service book to be treated as authentic .

In rejoinder it has also been stated by the management that the present reference is not arising out ofany industrial dispute . It has been denied that the date ofbirth recorded in the records of the company was incorrect and the concerned lady was not aware of the same as she is illiterate . It has also been denied that the service excerpt was not issued to the concerned lady. It has been stated that regarding superannuation of the concerned lady the age of her husband may be less than her own age and the circumstances under which they married with each other it is not known to the management and the management has no concern to enquire about the family matters of different workman. It has been prayed the awardbe passed holding that the concerned lady is not entitled to any relief.

6. Learned representative of the workman argued that MW- 1 in cross - examination at page 2 stated- " it is true that in the year 1987 Kaushalya Kamin was not issued with service excerpt . There is other document not only service excerpt as per written statement of the workman. Shejoined in the year 1973 and as per company's rule I.D. Card was also issued in which the same date of birth has been mentioned. There are other paper/papers in which date of birth is mentioned , and it has been clearly stated byMW - 1 that as per Ext . M - 1 the date of appointment of the concerned workman is 31-1-73 and the date of birth hasbeen mentioned as 15-9-1936. The Form ' B ' Register The workman has filed rejoinder denying the facts stated in the written statement filed by the management . It has also been stated that the concerned workman demandedto correct her date ofbirth in Form 'B' Register through her union . It has also been mentioned that there is a provision in the JBCCI Circular that for ascertaining actual age of a workman concerned, the workman should be referred to the Medical Board constituted by the company and the concerned workman is also demanding 1908

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009 CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3( )]

Court No. I,Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 16-3-2009.

[No. L-20012/268/94- IR(C-1 ) ]

SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. I , AT DHANBAD

PRESENT : Shri Hari Mangal Singh, Presiding Officer

Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1 (d) ofthe I.D. Act. , 1947.

Reference No. 70 of 1996 .

and ServiceExcerpt show that these ware prepared when the person concerned entered in the service of the company.Morever, the concerned workanan took payment after retirement and she stated in cross-examination at page-2that heworked till September, 1996. Though it has been admitted that she had represented to the management thatheragewas incorrectly mentioned, but no application has been proved before retirement for correction of ver age. Accordingly to her, she has no proof for malaing representation one year prior to her retisement . When she got retirement notice she represented for medical examination as it has been stated in cross-examination that after receipt of notice of superannuation she made representation before the management for modical examination . It only show that when notice of superannuation was received then she moved application for correction of age and as per law laid down correction ofdate ofbirth at the fag end ofservice cannot be allowed.

Parties :Employers in relation to the management of Bhowra (S) Colliery ofM /s . BCCL and their workman.

APPEARANCES

Onbehalfofthe workman : Mr. Kamlesh Singh, Advocate .

Another ground which has been argued by the learned counsel of the workman that as per service except ofher husband, Kalia Bhuia, her age wouldbe 32 years. But this argument has got no force because the date of birth of any workman is accepted which has been mentioned in service excerpt.

Onbehalfofthe employers: Mr. H. Nath, Advocate

State: Jharkhand

: Industry: Coal .

Dated, Dhanbad, the 27th Februray, 2009

AWARD

7. The concerned workman after her retirement represented before the management and got all superannuation benefits , so no question for referring her for assessment ofdate ofbirth/age does not arise and the actionofthe management was justified in not referringher for determination of her age by the Medical Board is justified and the sonowned workman is not entitledto any relief.

In the above manner the award is passed. H. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

TheGovernment of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise ofthe powers conferred on them under Section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following disputeto this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/268/94- IR ( Coal- I) , dated, the 21st June, 1995.

नई दिल्ली , 16 मार्च , 2009

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Bhowra (S) colliery ofM/ s . BCCL is justified in dismissing Sri Saran Bouri ? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?"

का.आ. 1016.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी.सी.सी.एल. के अबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्दिष्त औधोगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. I धनबाद के पंचाट ( सदर्भ सं. 70/1995) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/268 /94- आई आर ( सी-I ) ] स्नेह लता जकास , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 16th March, 2009

2. The case of the workman as per W.S. filed on behalf of the concerned workman is that the workman concerned was working as a Line Mazdoor in 28 No. Khadan, Bhowra (S) Colliery under M/ s . BCCL and he was absent from his duty from 8-6-1984 due to the mental derailment and inspite of the medical treatment provided the concerned workman did not come into his sound mind. On5-6-90 the Medical Board concerning the assessment ofthe mental stability of the concerned workman, his wife AnniBourin took him before the Medical Board in Jealgora Colliery. But the concerned workman due to mental derailment filed away from the hospital, As a result the S.O. 1016. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central overnment hereby publishes theAward (Ref. No.70/1995) of the Central Government Industrial. Tribunal/Labour 1909

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Medical Board could not be held . The wife of the concerned workman again intimated to the management on7-6-90. The wife ofthe workman concerned again and again requested the management for constitution of the medical Board to assess the derailment of the mind ofthe concerned workman but the management failed to do so anddismissed the concerned workman from employment . Ithas been alleged that the concerned workman and his wife was not informed about the dismissal ofthe concerned workman. However , the wife of the concerned workman learnt from the ALC( C) , Dhanbad on 2-9-1993 about the dismissal of the concerned workman. She requested the management again and again to recall the dismissal order and to constitute the Medical Board. But her request was ignored. It has been further submitted on behalf of the workman that the concerned workman was admitted under the treatment of Dr. Shailendra Kumar in Devis Institute ofNeuro Psychiatry , Boreya Road, Kanke, Ranchi for his mental treatment on 24-4-1981 . It has further been stated inthe W.S. that the Agent ofBhowra (S) Colliery wrote a letter to the Superintendent of Mansik Arogyashala , Ranchi vide Reference No. PS/82(S ) , dated 17-2-1982 and referred the concerned workman for his treatment in general bedasper sanction of the competent authority vide letter No. BCCL/ CMD/ 5846 dated 4-2-82. Thereafter the concerned workman got his mental treatment under the Medical Doctor, Dr. Asit Baran Patra in Manasik Arogya Niketan, Kanainatsar , G.T. Road, Burdwan (W.B. ) on 2-4-83, 5-6-83 and 26-5-83. It has been submitted on behalf ofthe concerned workman with a prayer to pass anAward in favour of the concerned workman directing the management to reinstate the concerned workman in his original job with full backwages.

absenting from his duty w.e.f. 18-6-1984 unauthorisedly without any information/permission from the competent authority, he was issed a chargesheet vide letter No. 41 / 479 dated 15-3-1993 for violating clause 26-1-1 of the Certified Standing Order applicable to the employees of M/s . BCCL . As no reply of the said chargesheet was received from the concerned workman , Sri K.K. Singh , Dy . Personnel Manager , Bhowra was appointed as an Enquiry Officer by the Agent, Bhowra ( S ) Colliery. The Enquiry Officer fixed 15-3-1993 at 11.00 A.M. as the date and time ofhearing. Although the concerned workman was informed in writing and letter also was sent to his home address through registered Post with A/D , the concerned workman neither participated in the enquiry proceeding nor sent anywritten information about his inability to appear in the enquiry proceeding . Subsequently, 29-3-1993 was fixed as the date of hearing and the same was published in the local newspaper " AWAZ " informing the concerned workman that if he failed to appear in the enquiry proceeding the enquiry shall proceed ex parte . However , the concerned workman did not appear on 29-3-1993 . The enquiry was conducted ex parte by the Enquiry Officer who after examining the evidence of the management witnesses came to the finding that the concerned workman was absenting from duty without any information or permission of the competent authority which amounted to misconduct under the Certified Standing Order of the Company. Thereafter the Enquiry Officer submitted his report to his superior officer who in turn sent the papers to the General Manager , Bhowra Area who agreed after going through the report of the enquiry that the concerned workman should be dismissed from his service . Accordingly, the concerned workman was dismissed vide letter No. TS/BH ( S)/93-23 / 1211 dated 1-6-1993 with immediate effect . It has been submitted that the Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry fairly , properly and is accordance with the rules of principle of natural justice andthe concerned workman failed to attend intentionally the enquiry proceeding even after the next date ofbearing published in the local newspaper " AWAZ". The charges against the concerned workman were proved and the management had no alternative but to dismiss the concernedworkman in the larger interest ofthe company as such long absence affects the production of the coal which isvital for the Country's industries . The punishment ofdismissal imposed by the employers is neither harsh nor severe .Anypunishment short ofdismissal would have beenanencouragement to other employees ofthe company doing similar misconduct in large number which would have paralised not only production of Coal but also the safety of the mines and the persons employed therein. Accordingly, it has been prayed to pass an Award holding the dismissal of the concerned workman as justified and the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief.

3. As per W.S. filed on behalf of the management thepresent industrial dispute is not maintainable both in law and facts ofthe case . The working President ofBihar Mines Laljhanda Mazdoor Union vide letter, dated 17-4-1993 raised the Industrial Dispute about Suren Bouri which was mumbered as 1/(76)/93-F.5. However, on receipt of letter from the ALC (C) , Dhanbad the Project Officer, Bhowra (S) Colliery vide his letter No. PS/BH (S) -93/07/ 1170 dated 24-7-1993 explained the facts ofthe case and stated that the concerned workman started absenting from his duty from 8-6-1984 for which he was chargesheeted vide letter dated 4-4-88 . The General Manager, Bhowra Area taking a lenient view of the case allowed the concerned workman to resume his duty subject to medical fitness and the concerned workman was advised to appear before the Medical Board for his medical examination but the concerned workman never appeared before the Medical Board and remained asbenting from his duty unauthorisedly. It has been further stated on behalf ofthe management that since the concerned workman Sri Suren Bouri who was an employee of Bhowra (S) Colliery was 1910

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :APRIL 18, 200МСНATRA 28, 1931

4. Both the parties have filed their rejoinder admitting and denying the contents of some of the perss ofeach other's written Statement .

5.Managementhas produced and examinedMW- 1 K.K. Singh who has proved documents marked as Ext. M- 1, M-2, M-3 , M-3/1 , M -4, M-5 , M-5/ 1 and M-6. In the present case itappears that on preliminary point regarding fairness andpropriety of the domestic enquiry orderwas passedbymypredecessor- in- office on 8-10-2002 wherein it has been held that enquiry was not conducted by the EnquiryOfficer fairly and property.

6. Main argument advanced on behalf of the workmanis that the offence committed by the concerned workman is of minor nature and he should not be dismissed. He also argued that charge has not been proved and that only after issuance of chargesheet 48 hourstime hasbeengiven which is not sufficient time to give reply by the concerned workman. Ld . Counsel for the management argued that the concerned workman became insane due to illness for a number ofyears and when notice was sent and chargesheet was given at his address and whenitwas not served, it was published in the newspaper marked as Ext . M -2.

7. As per W.S. filed on behalf of the concerned workman it appears that the concerned workman was absent from duty since 8-6-1984. On 5-6-1990 Medical Board was constituted concerning the assessment of the mental stability of the concerned workman , his wife took him before the Medical Board in Jealgora Hospital but the concerned workman due to mental derailment fled away from the hospital . It only shows that the management tried to get him medically examined for medical derailment and chargesheethas been issued on 4-4-88 when the concerned workman has not been able to perform his duties dueto mental derailment and the said chargesheet has been issued under clause 26.1.1-Habitual late attendance or fulfil or habitual absence from duty without sufficient cause. It is also stipulated therein why disciplinary action shouldnot be instituted against the concerned workman. It only shows that the concerned workman is not able to perform his duties due to mental illness . Therefore, there is no ground to take him back or to keep in the roll of the management.

8. Ld. Counsel for the workman argued that when theenquiry proceeding was not found fair and proper the concerned workman should be taken on roll of the management . But this argument has got no force because the concerned workman is not able to perform his duties as he is mentally disabled. When he is mentally disabled, in such circumstances the Government company/ organisation cannot keep him on the roll and pay salary from Government fund . Though as per Ext . W- 1 management has tried that the concerned workman should be examined by the Medical Board but he fled away and as per papers filed by the concerned workman it shows

[PART II-Sac.3(i )) that he was mentally ill . I have gone through the enquiry report though the enquiry was not held fairly and properly. However, it shows that the concerned workmanwas abeent frem duty for quite a long time as he was mentallydisabled to perform his duties . Under such circumstances , it isnot proper to leesy such persens in the roll ofthe company. So it shows that management was justified in dismissing the concerned workman . I find no merit in the claim of the concemed wordman. Accordingly, the following Award is rendered:-

"The action ofthe management of Bhowra(S) CollieryofM/s: BCCL is justifiod in dismissing Sci Susen Bouri . Consoquently , the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief. "

H. N. SINGH , PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 16 मार्च , 2009

का.आ. 1017. (1947 का 14 ) की भास मैं. की.की. जी. एल. के प्रबंध औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार संबनियोजकोंऔर उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुकन्ध में निर्दिन औद्योगिक विचार में केन्द्रीय सरकार औजोणिक अधिकारण/ श्रम म्बंधिालय सं. 1, धनबाद के पंचाट (सदर्भ सं. 288/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/ 152/2000- आई आर ( सी.Ⅰ ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 16th March,2009 S.O. 1017.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No.288/2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. I, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation. to the management of BCCL and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 16-3-2009.

[No. L-20012/ 152/2000- IR(C-I)] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . I AT DHANBAD PRESENT : Shri H. M. Singh, Presiding Officer.

Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1 )(d) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947

Reference No. 288 of 2000

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Bhowra( S) Colliery ofM/ s . BCCL and their workman.

1911 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

APPEARANCES

Onbehalfofthe workman : Mr. S. Bose , Treasurer ,

R.C.M.S.

Onbehalf of the employers : Mr. D. K. Verma,

Advocate

State

: Jharkhand

Coal.

Industry

Dated, Dhanbad the 24th Februray, 2009

AWARD

TheGovernment of India , Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the povers conferred on them under Section 10(1 )( d) of the I.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L - 20012/152/2000 - I.R. ( Coal - I ) , dated, the 27th September,2000.

up the matter with the parties and held conciliation proceeding which ended in failure and a report was submittedto the Ministry of Labour vide his letter dated 28-3-2000 and hence this reference before this Tribunal for adjudication according to law,. As per service conditions prevailing in BCCL management a workman will superannuate/retire upon attaining the age of sixty (60) years and on that ground the management's action in stopping duty vide letter dated 20/21-8-1999 is violative oftheprinciples of natural justice and the right to work for earning a living for self and family. It has been alleged that the management has caused financial loss and economic difficulties for the family members of the concerned workman.Accordingly it has been prayed on behalfofthe workman to pass an Award in favour of the workman directing the management to allow him in duty till he completes sixty years of age and pay him wages for the idle period enforced upon him by the management vide letter dated 20/21-8-1999 .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Bhowra (S) colliery of M / s . BCCL in superannuating Sri Nizamuddin, Electrical Supervisor from the services of the company vide letter dt . 20/21-8-1999 is justified ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?"

3.Management side has also filed Written Statement stating therein that the present reference is not maintainable either in law or on facts . It has been stated that the concerned workman was appointed on 1-1-1956 and he worked for more than 42 years . According to the Policy and the provisions of the Mines Act, no one can work beyond 42 years taking initial age of entering into employment as 18 years . It has further been stated, onbehalf of the management that as the concerned workman has worked for more than 42 years he has been superannuated fromhis service of the Company vide letter dated 20/21-8- 1999 as per Mines Act . It has been stated that the superannuation of the concerned workman is legal and justified and accordingly he is not entitled for any relief.

4. Both the parties have filed their respective rejoinders admitting and denying the contents of some of theparas ofeach other's Written Statements .

5. Theworkman has produced and examined, himself asWW- I who has proved documents marked as Ext . W- 1 , W-2 and W - 2/ 1 . Management has also produced and examined Shri S.K. Khawas MW - 1 who has proved Ext. M- 1 andM- 2.

6. Main argument advanced on behalf of the workman is that as per Ext . W- 1 which is a certificate of Vihar Vidyalaya Pariksha Samity , the date of birth ofthe concerned workman has been recorded as 3-1-42 and he was wrongly superannuated presuming his age as 60 years. In this respect Ld. Counsel for the management argued that the concerned workman WW- 1 has stated in his cross - examination that " I have in all worked for 42 years and I have passed matriculation examination after coming into service. " It shows that when he has completed 42years ofservice , he was 18 years ofage when he entered in the service because before 18 years of age no question of giving job arises . As regards certificate it has been 2. In the W.S. filed on behalf of the concerned workman it has been stated that the concerned workman Nizamuddin is a permanent employee in the capacity of Electrical Supervisor of Bhowra (South) Colliery under Eastern JhariaArea of M/ s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited. As the concerned workman's father died in harness he was provided employment on humanitarian ground as helping hand in the Colliery Workshop w.e.f. 1-1-1956 which was duly recorded in all the statutory registers and after nationalisation of the collieries with effect from 1-5-1972 the concerned workman was allowed to continue in employment . During the course of his employment the workman passed matriculation examination in the year 1960 and subsequently went through all tests and selections till he was posted as Electrical Supervisor . It has been stated on behalf of the workman that in the form 'B ' Register his date ofbirth was recorded and the management did not question about the genuineness of the same . In fact the management did record his date of birth as 3-1-1942 in all records of the management . Accordingly the concerned workman was to superannuate in the year 2002 being his date of birth as 3-1-1942 but surprisingly the management vide their letter dated 20/21-8-1999 superannuated him for reasons not made known to him about the genuineness of his date of birth. After that the union of the workman took up the matter with the management but when no solution could be found represented the matter before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) Dhanbad vide letter dated 4-10-1999 and the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) , Dhanbad took 1912

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AP . 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28, 1931

[PART II-SBC. 3(ii)]

सत्कार औद्योगिक अधिकरणश्रम यालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट (जर्नली नं. 66/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-29025/1/2009- आई. आर. ( एम ) ] कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 20th March, 2009

S.O. 1018. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Governmenthereby publishes theAward (Ref. No. I.D.L.C. No. 66/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industriai Dispute between the employers inrelation to the management of Hidusthan Zinc Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government-en20-3-2009.

clearly stated by the conowned woilumen that he had passedMatriculation examination after coming inte serviec. So Ext. W-2 which is an I.D. Card and in which date of birth ofthe concerned werinnen has beentioned as 3-1-42 is not reicvant at all bocause it has been innsed on 25-5-73 . It only shows that the concerned workman mentionedwrong date ofbirth in the school examination and on that basis he has got exceed his date of birth in the I.D.Card on 25-5-73 because he has joined in service in 156andhaspassed Higher Secondary examination in 1960. Sothere is no doubt that he has passed Higher Secondary School examination after coming into service. So no question ofdate of birth shown in Higher Secondary certificate canbe entered in his service record in 1956 in Ext. W-2 Ext. M-2. Ext.M - 2 also shows that it has been prepared in 26-6- 87. It shows that it has also been proparod after catering into service and after his passing Higher Secondary Examination as perExt.W- 1 . or

[No. L-29025/1/2009- IR (M)]

KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer

ANNEAURE

MEPONE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT TIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURTAT HYDERABAD

Present: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer Deted, the 11th day ofFebruary, 2009

Industrial Dispute L.C. No. 66/2002

(Old I.T.LD. (C) No . 52/2001 Transferred from Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Visakhapatnam)

BETWEEN

.... Petitioner

Sri P. Raman Babu , LateAppanna, D. No. 5-35, Zinc Rail Gate, MindiPost, Visakhapatnam-530012.

7.Another argument advanced on behalf of the management is that he has passed Higher Secondary examination as per Ext. W- 1 but he has not takan any permission for giving examination .Asper Ext. W- 1 itshows that he was regular student of Vihar Vidyalaya Pariksha Samitybecause it has been mentioned that on the basis of hiswrittenpapers and other developments in the school hasbeen valued in 3rd class for issuing this certificate. It only shows that he has got this certificate manufactured by way of giving wrong date of birth and on that basis claiming correction ofhis date ofbirth as 3-1-42 because ofthefact that when as per his statement he joined service in1956 thenat that time he must have been 18 years ofage and after 4 years he has appeared in the examination in 1960. It means that he must have been atleast minimum 22 years ofage . Ifit is presumed that Ext. W- 1 is correct then in that case it shows that he was 18 yours of age in 1960 whenhe passed examination mentioning his date ofbirth as 3-1-42 . It only shows that he was not of 18 years of age in 1956 which falsifies his statement and certificate filed by the concerned workman.

AND

Ihave considered every aspect of the matter and I find no merit in the claim of the concerned workman.Accordingly the following Award is rendered:-

TheGeneral Manager, Hindusthan Zinc Limited, Zinc Smelter Post , Visakhapatnam- 530015

...Respondent

APPEARANCES

Forthe Petitioner

: M/ s . S. Ramachandra Rao & P. Srinivasa Rao , Advocates "The action ofthe management ofBhowra (S) Colliery ofM/ s . BCCL in superannuating Sri Nizamuddin, Electrical Supervisor from the services of the company vide letter dt . 20/21- 8-99 isjustified. Consequently, the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief."

For the Respondent :

H. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

M/ s . D.V. Subba Rao & D.V.S.S. Somayajulu , Advocates

AWARD

नई दिल्ली , 20 मार्च , 2009

का.आ. 1018.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार हिन्दुस्तान जिंक लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबन्ध में निर्विष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय

This is a case taken under Sec . 2 A (2) of the I.D. Act, 1947 by the Labour Court, Hydeebad in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/s . Cotton Corporation of India 1913 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

examine the Management witnesses on the ground of recovery ofalleged stolen property has vitiated the entire domestic enquiry proceeding and the finding of Enquriy Officer is based on no evidence .

and two others and transferred to this Court in view ofthe Government of India, Ministry of Labour's order No.H- 11026/ 1/2001 - IR(C- II) dated 18-10-2001 bearing I.T.I.D. (C) No. 52/2001 and renumbered in this Court as L.C.I.D. No. 66/2002.

2.The Petitioner Sri P. Raman Babu filed this Petition against the Management of Hindustan Zinc Limited challenging the order ofdismissal dated 22-5-2001 with full service benefits and continuity of service.

4. The Management Respondent has filed counter statement denying the allegation made in claim petition and has stated that the principles of natural justice were not violated during the course of the domestic enquiry proceeding. The workman was caught by CISF personnel atthe main gate of the company while the Petitioner was taking one bag of leitharge wrapped in a duster cloth duly concealed inhis bicycle . The workman participated in the domestic enquiry proceeding and appointed his defence assistant who presented his case before the Enquiry Officer. Management witnesses were examined and cross examined by the Petitioner who stated that the Petitioner was carrying leitharge wrapped in a duster cloth on his bicycle and was caught by the CISF guard on 18-10-1993 at 6 A.M. Stolen property was produced before the Enquiry Officer which was idenified by the co - worker . No violationofprinciples of natural justice was caused and no prejudice has been caused to the Petitioner. Factum of theft and recovery of the stolen property was substantiated by the Management witnesses during course of domestic enquiry and the Enquiry Officer has submitted his report holding that the charges levelled - against the Petitioner are proved. On the basis of the report ofthe Enquiry Officer the services of the Petitioner were terminated. The Petitioner has violated para 19 ( iii ) of the standing order of the company and thus the termination order is legal and valid. The punishment imposed by the Respondent is in proportion to the magnitude of misconduct committed by the workman. The allegation that the punishment is disproportionate to the offence committed by the Petitioner is baseless and petition deserves to be dismissed .

5.The Respondent side has produced the file relating to the domestic enquiry preceedings which runs in 106 pages.

3. It has been submitted that the Petitioner was appointed as helper and was posted as senior labour with E.No. 41862, at Z.E. & M. Plant, Hindustan Zinc Limited and was working since 21-3-1977 . It was alleged that he was found in the possession of company's property on 2-11-1993 by the CISF personnel at the company's gate and the Petitioner was held to be guilty of stealing the company's property, a domestic enquiry was conducted in the matter and Petitioner was terminated from Service vide the order of Respondent Management dated 22-5- 2001. Petitioner filed appeal before the Appellate Authority of the Hindustan Zinc Limited , Udaipur which was dismissed on 6-6-2001 . Thus , the Petitioner approached this court and has requested this court to set aside the dismissal order . It was been alleged that he has not committedany theft . No company property was recovered from this possession . None of the witnesses of the Management examined during the course of enquiry proceeding has stated that the Petitioner was found in possession of company's property and he has stolen company's propery . The alleged stolen property was not producedbefore the Enquiry Officer nor it was shown to the Petitioner nor Petitioner was afforded opportunity to cross examine the witnesses on the question of recovery of alleged stolen property . None of the Management witnesses have stated that the Petitioner was found in possession of the stolen property, the Management witness has stated that the said company's property is of no value , it's value is nil in the market . This also proves thatalleged theory of theft of company's property is a concocted one and the charges levelled aganist the Petitioner is baseless . The Enquiry Officer has given his findings on no evidence . As such, it could not be accepted, the charges were not proved against the workman . His dismissal is baseless . It is not supported with any evidence and hence it is illegal and biased in the eye of law . The Petitioner has also challenged validity and legality of the domestic enquiry alleging therein that the principles of natural justice has been violated. No opportunity was afforded to the Petitioner to cross examine the Management witnesses on the question of alleged recovery of the stolen property . Though several times Petitioner has requested to Enquiry Officer to summon Management witnesses for their cross examination on the question of recovery of alleged stolen property. Thus by not affording opportunity to the Petitioner to cross

6. Preliminary objection was raised regarding validity and legality of the domestic enquiry proceedings , my learned predicessor has heard both the parties on the question of legality and validity of domestic enquiry and byhis detailed order dated 26-6-2006 he has held that the domestic enquiry conducted against the Petitioner is valid Thereafter both parties were heard U/ s 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 by me. It has been argued bythe Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the Enquiry Officer has committed mistake in appreciation of the evidence adduced before him during enquiry proceedings because none of the witnesses of the Management or personnel of CISF examined before the Enquiry Officer identified the alleged stolen property thought it is allered that the stolen property was recoveredby the CISF pers. Butthe Inspector of CISF Mr. M.K. Roy who was examined 1330 G1/09-23 1914

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

sheeted employee to cross examine the witnesses on the question of identification of the alleged stolen property. Thus, the Management has not been able to prove that the workman was guilty of theft of company's property and thereby he has violated standing order 19( 3 ) of the company.

as4th witness of the Management during departmental proceedinghas stated that he cannot produce the material before the EnquiryOfficer. He was asked by the Petitioner's assistant that, who asked to release Mr. Raman Babu , then, the Inspector Mr. M.K. Roy has stated that it may be kept in mind that Mr. Raman Babu was not arrested at all by CISF and he was only detained for getting some clarification from the competent authority because no charge of theft was levelled against him by, concerned departmental land. He has further argued that it has been alleged that alleged stolen material was found by 2nd Management witness, the Head ConstableMr. H.S. Pal of CISF. He has also not identified the material before the Enquiry Officer nor the Management has produced the stolenmaterial at the time of examination ofH.S. Pal . No report was made by CISF Head constable or any CISF personnel . It was the duty of Head constable to take possession of the alleged stolen property and hand over thethiefto theduty officer. But, the first officer ofCISFby whom it is alleged that he recovered the stolen property has neither taken custody of the alleged material nor the material was produced by the Management at the time of statement ofwitness Mr. H.S. Pal or other witnesses . The alleged material was produced before the Enquiry Officer after the close of oral evidence of the Management witnesses and their cross-examination was already finished by co-workers who has assisted the charge-sheeted employee. It is alleged that Sri G. Balaji arrived at the spot at the time ofconfiscation ofthe material, but he was not produced for cross -examination on produced of alleged material . The Management representative has objected to the request of the co-worker of the charge sheeted employee for cross -examination of Sri G. Balaji on the basis ofearlier cross -examination ofwitnesses . Thus it is evidence from the domestic enquiry file that the l stolenproperty was notnot produced at the time ofsteent of witnesses nor it was identified by any of ye witnesses in whose presence the stolen property wsa recovered from the possession of the delinquent employee. Thus in absence of the cross - examination of the Management witnesses great prejudice has been caused to the workman and thus Enquiry Officer has violated the principles ofnatural justice in not conferring reasonable and proper opportunity to the delinquent employee. Thus enquiry procedure adopted by the EnquiryOfficer is violative ofprinciples ofnatural justice and conclusions are based on no evidence. It has been argued by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that although the Learned Counsel Presiding Officer of this court hasheld that the domestic enquiry is legal and valid even then, this court U/s 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is competent to go through the evidence produced before the Enquiry Officer and come to a coachmina whether the charges levelled against the wodswere proved or not. The enquiry files amplyprove that ao properopportunity was afforded to the charge-

7. I have gone through the evidence ofH.S. Pal and M.K. Roy, the CISF personnel by whom the arrest of charge- sheeted employee was alleged to have been made. Sri G. Balaji, Manager (P) is said to be present at thetime CISF personnel arrested and recovered company's property. Sri G. Balaji has stated that on 18-10-93 one , Head plant shift Engineer M.S. Ephrim informed him that one employee Mr. P. Raman Babu was caught by CISF the main gate while carrying leitharge material . He has stated that he along with Ephrim went to CISF Inspector's room and asked CISF Inspector to show the material on basis ofthis statement it cannot be said that G. Balaji was present onthe spot when the alleged recovery was made from the possession ofP. Raman Babu. So far as the statement of H.S. Pal , Head Constable is concerned, he has stated that on 18-10-93 , P. Raman Babu came to the gate on his cycle , he dashed against the flower pot and his cycle got dishalanced. He put his cycle on stand at the same time some material fell down from the bicycle which was wrapped induster piece of cloth, then, he got suspicious and asked him what material was wrapped in the cloth. Mr. Raman Babu replied that it was nothing and he triedto go out with that material . Since he was doubtful about the material and asked him to stop and also threatened that hewouldcall police, then he informed Mr. Madan Mohan Dass, Asst. Sub - Inspector and reported him for severe action . He has stated that he called Madan Mohan Dass , DutyOfficer and came to the spot. M.M. Dass , inspected the material and called Inspector. The inspector came to the gate at 6.10 A.M. and called Plant Manager . When CISF Inspector came, Raman Babu was inside the CISF office room. It has been asked whether Raman Babu was carrying anymaterial along with him when he was allowed to go, it has been replied that he has taken nothing with him.Nowhere in his examination or cross examination the witness has stated that Raman Babu was having any stolen material with him . Mr. H.S. Pal, Head Constable has stated in his cross examination that before checking of Raman Babu , the material was not found. Meaning thereby that the material has not been recovered from the possession of Raman Babu. Not only that, it has been askedto H.S. Pal that whether he put the material inside the CISF room , to this question he has replied that he did not take the material inside CISF room, but one engineer from leadplant had taken the material inside the CISF room . Hehas further stated that while taking the material along with Raman Babu, he was inside CISF room . Thus , it is evident from the evidence of H.S. Pal that he neither recovered the company's property from the possession 1915 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

production of alleged recovered property. Thus , I am in agreement with the argument of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that no reasonable and proper opportunity wasaffordedby the Enquiry Officer to cross examine the witnesses after the production of alleged recovered material . Not only that, none of the witnesses examined by the Respondent Management has idenfied the recovered material during the course of departmental proceeding. Thus , the finding recorded by the Enquiry Officer isbased on no evidence and the argument of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner is acceptable that the finding recorded by the Enquiry Officer holding the chargsheeted employee guilty of the theft and holding him guilty of having possession of the company's stolen property does not find support from the statement of witnesses examined by the Management.

9. Sincethe factum of possession of stolen-property is not proved and the prejudice has been caused to the Petitioner during the course of domestic enquiry, the imposition of punishment on the basis of such a finding is bad in law, the punishment has been imposed on the basis ofwrong finding based on no evidence . Thus this court has come to the conclusion that Respondent has not been able to prove during the course of enquiry that the Petitioner workman was in possession of company's stolen property and any stolen property of the company was recovered from the possession of the Petitioner workman P. Raman Babu and thus the punishment of termination or dismissal from the service imposed on 22-5-2001 is bad in law and deserves to be set aside . The respondent is directed to reinstate the workman within a period ofthree months from the date of this judgement on the post he was already holding on the termination/ retrenchment of his services and they are further directed to pay the petitioner his salary from the date ofhis joining in service . He shall not be entitled for any salary during theperiod ofhis dismissal from the services till the date he will jointhe department on the basis of this judgement.....

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 11th day ofFebruay, 2009.

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for Petitioner Respondent

Nil

Documents marked for the Petitioner Nil Documents marked for the Respondent Nil

of Raman Babu nor he took Raman Babu inside CISF room but Raman Babu was taken inside CISF room by one engineer of plant . No statement of Raman Babu was takenby H.S. Pal nor he has prepared any recovery memo. No material was sealed nor any identification mark was put in by H.S. Pal. Thus , from the statement of this witness it is not proved as to who caught Mr. Raman Babu or in whose presence or by whom the recovery of the stolen propertywas made . Neither the material was taken in his custody nor it was taken by CISF staff in CISF room; Same thing has been stated by Mr. M.K. Roy , Inspector who has arrived at the spot on the information given by the duty officer . Duty Officer also has not stated that in his presence the alleged stolen material was recovered from the possession of P. Raman Babu nor the material wasproduced before H.S. Pal or G. Balaji or M.K. Roy. Thus , the evidence of S.K. Nawab , management witness constable ofCISF is also of no importance . He has stated that he heard some connotation near the gate when he went to the gate , he saw a packed in H.S. Pal's hand. He asked what it was , them H.S. Pal replied that Raman Babu was taking the leitharge and he was caught by H.S. Pal and Raman Babu was taken inside CISF room . This statement of witness S.K. Nawab is in contravention with the statement of H.S. Pal who stated that he did not took the recovered material in possession nor he ' took Mr. Ramana Babu or stolen material in CISF room . Contradictory statement on question of taking inside of the stolen property by H.S. Pal, Head Constable and S.K. Nawab show that the statement of S.K. Nawab is not true and no reliance can be placed on his statement because H.S.Pal has no where stated that he took the material in his custody or caught hold of Raman Babu and took him in CISF room . Thus , the statement of S.K. Nawab and H.S.Pal does not prove the alleged theft of company's property. The Management has examined K. Jyotiprakasham , who was not the witness to the recovery of alleged stolen property. He has stated that he came and stayed in the inspectore room and asked for the material which is said to be recovered fron P. Raman Babu. Then , inspector shown him the material placed on his table . Thus , the evidence of K. Jyotiprakashram is of no help and no credence can be given to his evidence on the question of recovery of stolen property from the possession of P. Raman Babu . He is a person who has arrived in the inspectors room after the alleged recovery has been completed. After the close of the evidence the material was brought before Enquiry Officer and it was shown to the co - worker who was assisting the chargesheeted employee. The co - worker requested Enquriy Officer to produce CISF constable who has recovered this material and caught hold of the chargesheeted employee . The charge- sheeted employee's side has further requested to cross examine H.S. Pal, G. Balaji and M. K. Roy and Ephrim and other witnesses . But no opportunity was given to the co-worker to cross examine these witnesses after 1916

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 20 मार्च, 2009

का.आ 1019. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार न्यू इंडिया एश्यूरेन्स कम्पनी लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औधोगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आईडीएलसी सं. - 123 /2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-17025/1/2009- आई.आर ( एम ) ]

कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 20th March, 2009

S.O. 1019. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.IDLC No. 123/2004 ) of the Central Government Industrial TribunalLabour Court, Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of New India Assurance Company Ltd. and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 20-3-2009.

[No. L- 17025/1/2009- IR(M) ]

KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURTAT HYDERABAD

Present: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur , Presiding Officer Dated the 16th day ofFebruary , 2009 IndustrialDispute L. C. No. 123/2004 :. (Old L.T.LD( C) . No. 45/2002 Transferred from Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court, Visakhapatnam)

BETWEEN

Sri Golagana Satyanarayana ,

S/ o Appa Rao ,

D.No. 10-17-10,

Saranga Dora Street ,

Srikakulam- 532001 .

..Petitioner

AND

1. The Divisional Officer ,

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Opp: Surya Mahal , Srikakulam

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 2. The Regional Officer,

The New India Assurance Company Ltd.

DwarakaNagar,

Respondents Visakhapatnam

APPEARANCES

Forthe Petitioner : Sri K. Bharat Kumar , Advocate For the Respondent : Sri Syed Moinuddin , Advocate

AWARD

This is a case taken under Sec.2A ( (2) of the I.D. Act , 1947 by the Labour Court , Hyderabad in view of the judgement of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated 3.8.1995 between Sri U.Chinnappa and M/ s . Cotton Corporation of India and two others and transferred to this Court in view of the Government of India , Ministry of Labour's order No. H- 11026/ 1 / 2001 - IR (C - II) dated 18.10.2001 bearing I.T.I.D. (C) No. 45/2002 and renumbered in this Court as L.C.L.D. No. 123/2004 .

2.This case has been filed by Sri G. Satyanarayana to declare his dismissal/retrenchment or termination of services order dated 15.3.2002 is illegal and further requested this court to set aside the dismissal order and reinstate the petitioner with full service benefits . It has been alleged that the petitioner was employed by the 2nd respondent on 14.9.2000 on daily wages as messenger cum office boy@Rs . 30/ -. The salary was increased to Rs.50/- perday. The Petitioner worked continuously till 15.3.2002 on which date his services were retrenched / terminated by the oral orders of the Respondent . At the time of retrenchement, Petitioner was getting Respondent 50/- per day. The Respondent did not pay the wages of the Petitioner for 15 days i.e. , from 1.3.2002 to 15.3.2002 . It has been stated by the Petitioner that he worked with utmost satisfaction of the management and during the course of employment no warning etc. , was given to the Petitioner. At the time of retrenchment of the Petitioner no notice was given tohim nor the wages in lieu ofthe notice were paidto the Potitioner, thereby the management has contravened the mandatoryprovisions of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. The Petitioner issued a notice dated 15.6.2002 to the management calling upon the management to reinstate the Petitioner into service with back wages and other benefits . The management gave reply on 20.6.2002 and turned down the Petitioner's request . Thus , the Petitioner has been forced to file this petition to seek relief from this court.

3. The counter statement was filed by the Respondent wherein it has been stated that the Respondent company is a Central Government undertaking and the Petition u.s 2A( 2) of Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 is not applicable , as it is A.P. state amendment . The statement of the Petitioner that he was employed as messenger-cum- office boy is absolutely false . It has been stated by the Respondent that Petitioner was never 1917 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

appointed as messenger - cum- office boy but he was supplying tea and sundry articles in the premises ofthe Respondent and his services were utilized by the Respondent for some time for giving local tapals and for that service he was paid some amount in token. The Petitioner was never paid any amount as salary as claimed by him. It is false to state that Petitioner has worked from 14-9-2000 to 15-3-2002 continuously wtihout any break . Since he was never appointed as alleged by him , there is no relationship of the master and servant . He was rude and irresponsible for petty work and used to enter into arguments with the employees of OP I and is a habitual litigant . He worked as casual worker under RTA, Srikakulam, there also , he raised a similar dispute for regularization , though he was neither employed temporarily orregularly by RTA, Srikakulam . The notice given by the Petitioner was replied by the Respondent . Petitioner was neither appointed by the Respondent nor his services were terminated by the Respondent. As such , the Petitioner is not entitled for any relief claimed by him.

4. The Petitioner has filed rejoinder of the statement and has stated according to his claim petition .

5. Parties were given opportunity to produce their evidence Petitioner G. Satyanarayana filed his affidavit in the form ofexamination- in - chief and he produced himself for cross- examination . He has produced one Sri V. Krishna asworkman witness No.2 who has deposed in favour of the Petitioner . Apart from that oral testimony, the Petitioner has filed EX.W1 registered lawyer's notice to the Respondent dated 15-6-2002 , Ex . W2 reply of the management dated 20-6-2002 Apart from that the Petitioner has summoned Respondent's dispatch register w.e.f. 3-4-2001 to 15-3-2002 . He has further summoned the vouchers of payment made to G. Satyanarayana which runs in 67 pages to prove that he was paid wages according to these vouchers . Management has examined Sri K. Krupa Rao , A.A.O. of the management who has produced his affidavit and has appeared for cross examination . The management has filed copy of the judgment of Hon'ble A.P. Administrative Tribunal in the matter of Mr. G. Satyanarayana and RTA to prove that similar litigation was filedby Sri G. Satyanarayana against RTA .

6. On the date of the argument , management representative did not appear . Therefore , Petitioner's counsel has been heard by this court .

through the affidavit nor in the oral statement of the workman witness Sri G. Satyanarayana or cross- examination has stated that he was authorized to fill in the dispatch register of the management , or dispatch register producedby the management is in handwriting of witness . Thus, in the absence of any proof or any oral testimony of the Petitioner that the Xerox copy of the dispatch register is in his own hand writing, no reliance can be placed nor the argument of Learned Counsel can be accepted that Sri G. Satyanarayana was deputed to fill in the dispatch register of the Respondent management . Thus , the dispatch register summoned by the Petitioner from the office oftheRespondent is of no use . So far as the question ofappointment is concerned, the Petitioner has neither stated in his claim statement nor in his oral statement that he was appointed by any written order by the Respondent management . As against this , the WW1 Sri G. Satyanarayana has stated in the cross -examination that hewas not given any order of appointment. He has further stated that he did not sign either in the salary register or in the attendance register . However, he was stated that his signatures were obtained on the vouchers . He had admitted that he had worked in the office of R T A for some time and filed a case against them . Though he has denied the suggestion of the management that he was not appointed towork as messenger-cum-office boy and he was to a tea supplier to the officials of the Respondent . He has not been able to prove by any cogent documentary or oral evidence that he was appointed by the Respondent management on 14-9-2000 as alleged by him . So far as the vouchers are concerned, the Petitioner's counsel have argued that G. Satyanarayana was paid his salary through these vouchers , to substantiate his argument, the Learned Counsel has drawn the attention of this court towards the voucher dated 8-3-2002 by which Rs . 50 was paid to G. Satyanarayana . The voucher dated 7-3-2002 shows that a sum of Rs . 300. was given to G. Satyanarayana for the work ofoffice cleaning from 4-3-2002 to 8-3-2002 . Again there is voucher dated 7-3-2002 showing payment ofRs . 215 for the work ofoffice cleaning from 11-2-2002 to 15-2-2002, voucher dated 8-3-2002 receipt of Rs. 200 paid to G. Satyanarayana for cleaning of the office from 15-2-2002 to 28-2-2002, voucher dated 17-8-2001 ofRs.15 for bringing tea. Voucher dated 4-9-2002 for Rs . 30 for tea and biscuits . Voucher dated 1-9-2001 ofRs . 20 tea for clients . Voucher dated 3-9-2001 of Rs . 150 tea for clients . Voucher dated 3-9-2001 for Rs.1501 for office up- keeping and maintenance from 1-8-2001 to 3-8-2001 . Voucher dated 2-9-2001 ofRs . 6 for tea to clients . Voucher dated 3-9-2001 ofRs . 15 tea for clients . Voucher dated 5-9-2001 of Rs.30 tea for clients . Voucher dated 20-8-2001 of Rs . 248 for refreshment etc. for clients . Voucher dated 25-8-2001 ofRs . 30 tea for clients and staff. Voucher dated 24-8-2001 ofRs . 30 for tea to the staff . Voucher dated 24-8-2001 for rickshaw charges . Voucher dated 11-7-2001 of tea and snacks for Rs . 65 . Voucher dated 11-7-2001 for bringing cold drinks to the 7. It has been argued by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that from the own record of the management i.e. , Xerox copy of the dispatch register ofthe company or management and payment receipts of the management would prove that the Petitioner has worked with the management as office boy- cum-messenger . It is further argued by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the dispatch register has been filled in by the Petitioner in his handwriting. But nowhere in his examination - in - chief 1918

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] staff for Rs . 43. Voucher dated 11-7-2001 of Rs . 33 for water packets . Voucher dated 12-7-2001 of Rs . 38 for water packets .Voucher dated 23-8-2001 ofRs . 30 tea for clients and staff. Voucher dated 13-7-2001 of Rs . 48 tea and snacks for clients and staff. Voucher dated 16-7-2001 of Rs . 20 tea forclients and staff. Voucher dated 20-8-2001 of Rs . 20 tea for clients and staff. Voucher dated 16-7-2001 for bringing cold drinks and water packets to the staff for Rs.16. Voucher dated 17-7-2001 for Rs . 40 tea and snacks for clients and staff. Voucher dated 17-7-2001 for Rs . 46 tea and meals for staff. Voucher dated 19-7-2001 for Rs . 40 tea and snacks for clients and staff. Voucher dated 26-7-2001 ofRs . 50 tea and snacks for clients and staff. Voucher dated 26-7-2001 of Rs . 25 tea for clients and staff. Voucher dated 19-7-2001 of Rs . 25 tea and snacks for clients and staff. Voucher dated 30-7-2001 of Rs . 105 tea and snacks and cold drinks for clients and staff. Voucher dated 20-7-2001 for Rs. 300 for cleaning ofold records . Vouchers dated 31-7-2001 ofRs . 25 and dated 4-6-2001 of Rs . 30 tea and snacks for clients and staff. Voucher dated 21-2-2002 for verification of DL Number of Rs . 125 , voucher dated 3-9-2001 of Rs . 250 for office cleaning from 20-8-2001 to 24-8-2001. Dated 3-10-2001 voucher ofRs . 250 for cleaning from 3-9-2001 to 7-9-2001 . Dated 3-10-2001 voucher of Rs.250/- for cleaning from 10-9-2001 to 14-9-2001 . Dated3- 10-2001 voucher ofRs . 250 for cleaning from 24-9-2001 to 28-9-2001. Dated 3-10-2001 voucher ofRs . 250 for cleaning from 6-8-2001 to 10-8-2001 . Voucher dated 18-8-2001 of Rs . 100 for tea and snacks . V oucher dated 18-8-2001 of Rs . 60 for tea and snacks . Voucher dated 1-9-2001 of Rs . 73 refreshments to clients Voucher dated 3-9-2001 of Rs . 250 for upkeeping and maintenance . Voucher dated 6-9-2001 of Rs . 15 tea for clients . Voucher dated 26-9-2001 of Rs . 84 for refreshment . Voucher dated 10-9-2001 of Rs . 30 for tea for clients . Voucher dated 10-9-2001 of Rs . 60 for refreshment . Voucher dated 26-9-2001 of Rs . 84 for refreshment . Voucher dated 1-8-2001 of Rs . 179 for puja articles . Voucher dated 20-6-2001 of Rs . 6 for being everyday. Voucher dated 23-10-2001 of Rs . 60 upkeeping of office maintenance. Voucher dated 2-5-2001 of Rs . 50 for tea and snacks . Voucher dated 3-5-2001 of Rs . 40 for tea and snacks to clients and staff. Voucher dated 2-6-2001 of Rs . 15 for water packets . Voucher dated 4-12-2001 of Rs . 250 for office upkeeping and maintenance from 5-11-2001 to 9-11-2001 . Voucher dated 5-7-2001 of Rs . 16 for water packets . Voucher dated 28-5-2001 of Rs . 10 for tea and snacks to staff. Voucher dated 26-7-2001 of Rs . 32 for payment of pooja expenditure . Voucher dated 26-7-2001 ofRs. 58 for tea and snacks to clients and staff. Voucher dated 31-8-2001 of Rs . 30 for tea to staff. Voucher dated 31-7-2001 ofRs . 30 for tree plant . Voucher dated 30-8-2001 of Rs . 42 for refreshment to clients and staff. Voucher dated 9-7-2001 of Rs . 60 for tea etc to staff. Voucher dated 5-7-2001 ofRs . 20 for tea and snacks to clients and staff. Voucher dated 6-7-2001 of Rs . 60 for tea and snacks to

clients and staff. Voucher dated 9-7-2001 of Rs . 33 for water packets to staff. Voucher dated 3.5.2001 ofRs. 40 for tea and snacks to clients and staff . Voucher dated 24-1-2002 of Rs . 100/ - for DL verification . Voncher dated 28-9-2001 of Rs . 36 for tea for clients . Voucher dated 28-9-2001 of Rs . 123 for refreshment . Voucher dated 29-9-2001 of Rs . 199 for refreshment . Voucher dated 6-8-2001 of Rs . 27 for tea and snacks . Voucher dated 2-6-2001 of Rs. 900 for office upkeeping and maintenance for May, 2001. Voucher dated 2-5-2001 of Rs . 900 for expenditure of daily boy. Voucher dated 8-8-2001 of Rs . 30 for tea for clients and staff. Voucher dated 11-4-2001 of Rs . 20 for tea and snacks to clients and staff. Voucher dated 7-8-2001 of Rs . 20 for conveyance . Voucher dated 3-5-2001 of Rs . 40 for tea and snacks to clients and staff. Voucher dated 7-8-2001 of Rs . 20 for tea to clients and staff. Voucher dated 6-8-2001 of Rs . 11 for water packets . Voucher dated 2-11-2001 of Rs.250 for upkeeping of office from 8-10-2001 to 12-10-2001 . Voucher dated 2-11-2001 of Rs.250/- for upkeeping of office from 15-10-2001 to 19-10-2001 . Voucher dated 2-11-2001 of Rs . 200 for upkeeping of office from 1-10-2001 to 3-10-2001 . Voucher dated 2-11-2001 of Rs . 150 for upkeeping of office from 22-10-2001 to 23-10-2001 . Voucher dated 2-11-2001 of Rs . 100 for upkeeping of office from 29-10-2001 to 30-10-2001 . Voucher dated 7-1-2002 of Rs . 150 for verification ofDL . Voucher dated4-12-2001 of Rs . 200 for upkeeping ofoffice from 12-11-2001 to 13-11-2001 and 15th to 16th November, 2001. Voucher dated 4-12-2001 of Rs . 100 for upkeeping of office from 1-11-2001 to 2-11-2001 . Voucher dated 17-5-2001 of Rs . 20 for tea to clients and staff. Voucher dated27-6-2001 ofRs . 30 for conveyance charges. Voucher dated 28-6-2001 of Rs . 50 for tea to clients and staff . Voucher dated 28-6-2001 of Rs . 50 for tea to clients and staff. Voucher dated 29-5-2001 of Rs . 49 for cool drinks to staff. Voucher dated 29-5-2000 of Rs . 8 for conveyance charges . Voucher dated 16-6-2001 of Rs . 30 for tea to staff. Voucher dated 2-7-2001 ofRs . 60 for tea to staff. Voucher dated 2-7-2001 ofRs . 28 for water packets to staff. Voucher dated 2-7-2001 of Rs . 50 for refreshment . Voucher dated 2-7-2001 ofRs. 20 for tea to staff. Voucher dated 3-9-2001. ofRs.155 for refreshment. Voucher dated 29-6-2001 of Rs . 10 for water packets to staff. Voucher dated 28-6-2001 of Rs .25 for water packets to staff. Voucher dated 4-9-2001 ofRs . 30 for tea to clients . Voucher dated 8-5-2001 of Rs . 35 for tea to clients and staff. Voucher dated 27-9-2001 of Rs . 30 for tea to clients . Voucher dated 26-9-2001 of Rs . 30 for tea to clients . Voucher dated 26-9-2001 of Rs . 25 for iron charges of office banners . Voucher dated 24-9-2001 ofRs . 30 tea for clients . Voucher dated 24-9-2001 of Rs . 30 for refreshment . Voucher dated 4-12-2001 of Rs . 250 for upkeeping ofoffice from 26-11-2001 to 30-11-2001 . Voucher dated 4-12-2001 of Rs . 250 for upkeeping of office from 19-11-2001 to 23-11-2001 . Voucher dated 31-5-2001 ofRs . 135 for refreshment. Voucher dated 2-6-2001 ofRs . 20 for tea to clients and staff. Voucher dated 11-6-2001 of Rs . 50 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

1919

tea as is done in the case of the Petitioner himself. The voucher cited above proved that the Petitioner was paid onmost of occasions for supply of the tea and snacks to the office and clients of the Respondent . There is no mention of the name of V. Krishna in any vouchers of the Respondent . Hence , no reliance can be placed on the statement given by V. Krishna .

for tea to clients and staff. Voucher dated 4-5-2001 of Rs .30 for tea to staff. Voucher dated 25-4-2001 of Rs . 10 for tea to clients and staff. Voucher dated 26-5-2001 of Rs. 25 for tea to clients and staff. Voucher dated 6-8-2001 of Rs . 65 for tea and snacks to staff. Voucher dated 11-6-2001 of Rs . 60 for tea and meals to staff . Voucher dated 1-6-2001 ofRs . 300 for snacks and fruit juice . Voucher dated 25-5-2001 ofRs . 300 for repairs of fans and motor. Voucher dated 20-2-2002 of Rs . 125 for verification of driving license . Voucher dated 8-6-2001 of Rs . 20 for tea to clients and staff. Voucher dated 8-6-2001 of Rs . 20 for tea to clients and staff. Voucher dated 11-6-2001 of Rs . 47 for tea and biscuits to staff. Voucher dated 20-6-2001 of Rs . 35 for tea to clients and staff. Voucher dated 18-6-2001 of Rs . 50- for white washing . Voucher dated 20-6-2001 of Rs . 30 for tea and refreshment . Voucher dated 17-6-2001 of Rs . 20 for water packets . Voucher dated 15-6-2001 ofRs . 100 for gunnybags . Voucher dated 11-5-2001 of Rs . 40 for tea to clients and staff . Voucher dated 11-5-2001 of Rs . 20 for tea to clients and staff. Voucher dated 16-5-2001 of Rs . 25 for tea to clients and staff. Voucher dated 18-10-2001 of Rs .48 for refreshment to staff . Voucher dated 18-10-2001 of Rs . 52 for sending registered post. Voucher dated 11-10-2001 ofRs . 48 for postage acknowledgement cards . Voucher dated 4-7-2001 of Rs . 30 for tea and snacks to staff . Voucher dated 12-6-2001 ofRs . 45 for tea clients and staff. Voucher dated 12-6-2001 ofRs . 10 for stamps . Voucher dated 3-6-2001 ofRs . 100 for meals to their staff . Voucher dated 3-10-2001 ofRs . 250 for upkeeping of their office .

9. As against this , the Respondent has alleged that the Petitioner used to supply tea and snacks to the employees of the management Respondent and sometimes the management used to take the work of office cleaning from him as and when it was required by the Respondent . This contention of the Respondent management is proved from the vouchers produced by the Respondent management . Management witnesses MW2 Sri A. V.S. Prasad , A.A.O. , has stated that same thing in his affidavitand in cross examination also that whenever work ofcleaning was extracted from the Petitioner , he was paid Rs . 50. Earlier he used to be paid Rs . 30 only. He has also stated that voucher does not prove that 240 days continuous work was extracted from the Petitioner during any of the years . I am in full agreementwith the statement of the witnesses of the management which is supported with the documentary evidence produced by the management that the Petitioner was neither appointed to work as office boy or messenger nor he was engaged for any work of the Respondent on regular or temporary basis . The Petitioner has not been able to prove that he worked in the office of the Respondent management from 14-9-2000 till 15-3-2002 continuously, as such Petitioner is not entitled for being regularized or to be reinstated in the services , because his services were utilized as and when it was required by the management and when his services were utilized he was paid on daily basis . Thus , the contention of the Petitioner is unfounded based on no evidence. Hence, the Petitioner is not entitled for any relief. Petition deserves to be dismissed with costs .

Award passed accordingly . Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her, corrected by me on this the 16th day ofFebruary, 2009.

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined

for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

WW 1 : Sri G. Satyanarayana

WW2 : Sri V. Krishna MWI : Sri K. Krupa Rao

MW2 : A.V.S. Prasau

Documents marked for the Petitioner .

EX.WI: Copy of legal notice

8. Thesedocumentary evidence summoned by the Petitioner from the office of the respondent management does not prove that but for the month ofApril , andMay , 2001, the Petitioner has received monthly payment from Respondent management . The vouchers prove that whenever there was exigencies of work in any month for upkeeping of the office, the services of the Petitioner has been utilized and for that he was paid Rs . 50 on daily wage basis . These vouchers does not prove that the Petitioner has worked for any full month in any of the years . Thus , the contention of the Petitioner that he worked with the Respondent department from 14-9-2000 to 15-11-2002 is based on no evidence and this contention is not proved either by the own evidence of the Petitioner or the documents summoned from the office of the management . So far as the evidence of 2nd workman witness Sri V. Krishna WW2 , is concerned , he has stated that his tea stall is situated at a distance of 50 feet from the office of the Respondent and this witness used to supply tea to the members of the staff of the Respondent. He has stated that the Petitioner used to work as office boy and used to place order for supply of tea to the staff of the Respondent . He has stated that he used to go to the office of the Respondent to supply tea to their staff but he has not produced a single voucher which may prove that any amount was paid to this witness in token of the supply of

EX.W2 : Reply to Ex: W1

1920

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 18 , 2009/ CHAITRA 28 , 1931

Documents marked for the Respondent EX.MI: Copy of extract of the recruitment procedure EX.M2: Copy of order in OA No. 1594/97 dt. 2-4-97 EX.M3: Copy of extract of the dispatch register dated 14-9-2000 to 15-3-2002

नई दिल्ली, 23 मार्च, 2009

का.आ 1020. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार प्रसार भारती , भागलपुर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण पटना के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -42012/ 1 /2008- आई.आर ( डी.यू.) ]

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Labour, New Delhi in exercise of the powers conferred under clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub -section (2-A) of Section -10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as ' the Act' for brevity) has referred the industrial dispute between the managementmana of Prasar Bharati Corporation of India, Akashvani , Bhagalpur and theirworkman Sandeo Hari to this Tribunal for adjudication onthe following: -

""Whether the action of the management of Prasar Bharati , Bhagalpur in terminating the Services of their workman Shri Sandeo Hari , w.e.f. 31-10-99 is legal andjustified? Ifnot, to what reliefthe workman is entitled to?."

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 23rd March, 2009

S.O. 1020. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Patna as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation tothe management of Prasar Bharati , Bhagalpur and their workman , which was received by the Central Government οι 23-3-2009.

[No. L-42012/ 1/2008- IR (DU) ]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, SHRAM BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA.

Reference Case No. 42( C) of 2008.

Between the Management of Prasar Bharati Corporation of India , Akashvani , Bhagalpur and their workman Shri Sandeo Hari , S/ o Late Sarjug Hari , Resident ofGangdori , P.S. Dhoriaya , Dist. Banka.

For the Management : Sri D.K. Sinha ,

Mgt. Representative

Forthe Workman : Sri N.N.Choudhary , Secretary, PrasarBharati Karamchari Sangh.

Present: Shri Vasudeo Ram , PresidingOfficer Indl .Tribunal , Patna .

AWARD

Patna, Dated the 14th day of March, 2009 By adjudication Order No. L-42012/ 1 / 2008 - IR(DU) dated 27-3-2008 of Government of India , Ministry of 2.Both the parties appeared on notice and filed the written statement and the statement of claim respectively. The contention of the workman is that the post of 'Safaiwala' was vacant in Akashvani Station , Bhagalpur and his name was forwarded for the said post from District Emloyment Exchange , Bhagalpur . The Station Director issued interview letter (Ext . W) dated 20-8-1985 . The workman was appointed and absorbed against the post of ' Safaiwala' in the year , 1985. The workman was absorbed in permanent vacancies vide letter dated 9-8-1991 . The copy of order was sent to National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes andthe Commission vide order dated 30-9-1991 approved the same . The workman claimed regularisation vide application OA No. 412/2002 and OA No. 431/2003 but the management did not consider the same . Further , the contention of the workman is that Prasar Bharati came into existence by Gazette Notification No. 792 (E) dated 23-11-1997 . The management terminated the services of theworkman on 31-10-1999 . He was not given any notice , notice pay or compensation as required under Section 25F of ' the Act. ' The Station Director of Akashwani , Bhagalpur has not been empowered by the Prasar Bharati Broadcasting of India to terminate the services of the workman without misconduct or enquiry . It has been accordingly prayed by the workman that the Award be passed in favour of the workman granting reinstatement with all consequential benefits after setting aside the order ofhis termination.

3. The management does not deny that the post of 'Safaiwala' was vacant in Akashwani , Bhagalpur and the name of the workman was forwarded for the said post from District Employment Exchange and the Station Director issued interview letter and thereafter the workman was engaged. According to the management the workman was engaged purely on casual contract basis to do the cleaning works and the workman was not engaged on sanctioned post'Safaiwala' . In the letter dated 9-8-91 the workman was shown at serial No. 2 in the proposal for appointment to the post of 'Safaiwala' . The person at serial No. 1 has been absorbed and thereafter no post has fallen vacant so that thisworkman may be absorbed . Further, the contention of 1921 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

6. The workman (W.W. 1) has stated that his name was recommended from the Employment Exchange and thereafter he was called for interview and thereafter he was appointed in 1985 and his name was forwarded to Government of India for absorption. He has further stated thatearlier it was called Akashwani, it is being called Prasar Bharati from 1997 and his services went under the Prasar Bharati, Bhagalpur . The said facts have not been denied by the management W.W.2 has supported the statement and the case of the workman and does not require to be discussed in detail .

7. From the documents filed on behalf of the workman (Exts . W, W/ 1 ) it is apparent that the engagement / appointment of the workman was as casual worker. The workman (W.W. 1 ) in his statement before this tribunal has stated that he never worked on contract meaning thereby he was not a contract worker. The management has not challenged or refuted the said statement of the workman . The workman (W.W.1 ) has stated in his statement that he was paid wages monthly through voucher . The vouchers filedby him (Exts . W/ 5 to W/ 17 ) support the said contention and statement of the workman . The workman has stated that he worked more than two hundered and forty days every year and the management terminated his services in 1999 and thus he served the management for about 14 years.

the management is that the workman filed OA No. 412 of 2002, OANo. 431 of 2003 and OA No. 17 of2004 before the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal . The orders passed on 24-2-2003 and 30-10-2003 in the first two OA's by the Hon'ble CAT, Patna Bench were implemented by the department/management by issueing speaking and reasoned orders while the claim made by the workman in OA No. 17 of 2004 was rejected by the Hon'ble CAT. Further, according to the management this workman filed false complaint case before the learned C.J.M. Bhagalpur against the authorities of the department in which cognizance was taken by the learned C.J.M. but the same was quased by the Hon'ble High Court , Patna in Cr . Misc . No. 29660 of 2007. The workman filed contempt petition No. 02 of 2007 before the learned C.J.M. , Bhagalpur against the authorities which was dismissed vide order dated 25-04-2007. Under the circumstances , accordingto the management the re- engagement of the workman in the department would create a sense of fear and confusion among the authorities of All India Radio , Bhagalpur. Further, the contention of the management is that the workman was engaged on contract basis in February, 1991 and was disengaged w.e.f. 1-10-98 from contractual service . The contractual service can not be treated as the casual service . According to the management the claim made by the workman is fit to be denied and the Reference is fit only to be answered in favour of the management .

4. Upon the pleadings of the parties and keeping in view the terms of reference the following points arise out to be decided:-

(i) Whether the action of the management of Prasar Bharati , Bhagalpur in terminating the services of workman Shri Sandeo Hari w.e.f. 31-10-1999 is legal andjustified ?.

8. There can be dispute on the fact that Shri Sandeo Hari was a ' workman ' as defined under Section 2(S) of ' the Act ' . His services was terminated by the management after 14 years of his ' continuous service ' as defined under Section 25 - B of the Act . It is not the case of any party that the services of the workman was terminated by way of punishment or on reaching the age of super- annuation. Section 2( oo ) of' the Act defines ' ' retrechment ' asfollows:

( ii) To what relief, or reliefs if any the workman is entitled?.

FINDINGS

PointNo. (i) :

" retrenchment " means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any reason whatsoever , otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action , but does not include:-

(a) voluntary retirement of the workman ; or

(b) retirement of the workman on reaching the age of superannuation if the contract of employment between the employer and the workman concerned contains a stipulation in that behalf; or

5. The management did not adduce any evidence on its behalf. The workman has examined himself as W.W. 1 besides one Ashok Kumar Jha (W.W. 2) . The workman has got exhibited the photocopy of Interview letter (Ext. W) , photocopy of the Selection made by the Departmental Selection Committee (Ext . W/ 1 ) , photocopy of letter dated 9-8-91 issued by Station Director (Ext. W/2) , photocopy of letter dated 19-10-1991 of Station Engineer showing the work experience of Sandeo Hari (Ext . W/3 ) , photocopy of letter dated 14-1-99 issued by the Director for regularisation of service (Ext . W/4) , photocopy of payment vouchers (Ext . W/5 to W/ 7) and photocopy of Award dated 19th April , 2005 in Reference No. 193 of 1998 (Ext. W/18).

(bb) termination of the service of the workman as a result of the non - renewal of the contract of employment between the employer and the workman concerned on its expiry or of such contract being terminated under a stipulation in thatbehalf contained therein; or

1330 G1/09-24 1922

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: APRIL 18, 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

From the above discussions it is apparently clear that the workman has been retrenched from the service .

Section 25F of ' the Act' lays down certain conditions precedentto retrenchment of a wokman. Section 25F ofthe Actreads as follows :-

"No workman employed in any industry who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched by that employer until:-

(a) the workmanhas been given one month's notice in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment and theperiod of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the period ofthe notice;

(b) the workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment , compensation which shall be equivalent to fifteen days ' average pay (for every completed year of continuous service) or any part thereof in excess of six months ; and

(c) notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate Government ( or such authority as may be specified by the appropriate Government by notification in the Official Gazette.)

Admittedly no notice one month prior to retrenchment has been given to the workman by the management nor one month notice pay has been given nor the compensation according to Section 25F of the Act has been paid. Under the circumstances discussed above the termination of services of the workman by the management is illegal . The workman served continuously for about 14 years and the management all of a sudden threw him out of service in the midstream ofhis life . Under the circumstances the termination of the services of the workman is not only illegal it is unjust . Accordingly I find and hold that the action of the management of Prasar Bharati in terminating the services of the workman is neither legal nor justified. This point is decided accordingly.

Point No. ( ii):

9. It has already been discussed and held above that the action of the management in terminating the services ofthe workman is neither legal nor justified. Under the circumstances I find that the workman is entitled to reinstatement with back wages . This point is decided accordingly.

10. Under the circumstances discussed above and keeping in view the findings arrived at I find and hold that the action of the management of Prasar Bharati , Bhagalpur interminating the services of their workman Shri Sandeo Hari w.e.f. 31-10-99 is illegal and unjustified. The said workman Shri Sandeo Hari deserves to be reinstated on his

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] post with full back wages w.e.f. 31-10-99 within 60 days from thedate of publication of the Award.

11. And that is my Award .

VASUDEO RAM , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 24 मार्च , 2009

का.आ. 1021.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 1/2007) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-22012/ 155/2006- आई. आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 24th March , 2009

S.O. 1021.-In Pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 1/2007 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court- I Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M/s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited , and their workmen, receivedby the Central Government on 24-3-2009.

[No. L -22012/ 155/2006- IR ( CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ATHYDERABAD

PRESENT

Shri Ved Prakash Gaur , Presiding Officer Dated the 6th day of February , 2009 INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 1/2007 BETWEEN

The General Secretary, (Sri Bandari Satyanarayana ) , Singareni Collieries Employees Council , 18-3-90/3 , Ganesh Nagar, Markandeya Colony , Godavarikhani - 505209. ..... Petitioner AND

The General Manager , M/ s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Mandamarri Division , Mandamarri - 504231 .....Respondent भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009 /चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

APPEARANCES

Forthe Petitioner : Nil

Forthe.Respondent : M/ s . P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & P. Vijaya Laxmi , Advocates

AWARD

TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour by its OrderNo. L-22012/ 155 /2006- IR (CM - II ) dated 29-11-2006 referred the following dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 ,for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management ofM/ s . Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , and their workmen . The reference is :

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of M/ s . Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , in dismissing the services of Sri Yacoob w.e.f. 18-11-1997 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief he is entitled ? י

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 1/2007 and notices issued to the parties .

2. On6-2-2009 , case called out for filing ofclaim statement by Petitioner . Petitioner called absent while Respondent counsel is present. Though this case is pending since February , 2007. Petitioner has not filed claim statement . As such , the case is closed for want of claim statement . Hence , a Nil Award is passed. Transmit.

Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 6th day ofFebruary, 2009 .

VED PRAKASH GAUR, PresidingOfficer

Appendix ofevidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner :NIL Witnesses examined for the Respondent : NIL Documents Marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली , 24 मार्च , 2009

का.आ. 1022- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 2/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-220012/161/2006- आई. आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

1923 New Delhi , the 24th March, 2009

S.O. 1022. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 2/2007 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M/ s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 24-3-2009 .

[No. L-22012/ 161 /2006- IR (CM - II )]

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

Present :

SHRI VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer Dated, the 6th day of February, 2009 Industrial Dispute No. 2/2007

BETWEEN

The General Secretary,

.... Petitioner (Sri Bandari Satyanarayana) , Singareni Collieries Employees Council , 18-3-90/3 , Ganesh Nagar , Markandeya Colony , Godavarikhani- 505209 .

AND

The General Manager ,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , .

Mandamarri - 504231 .

Mandamarri Division, .....Respondent APPEARANCES

Forthe Petitioner : Nil

For the Respondent : M/ s . P.A.V.V. S. Sarma & P. Vijaya Laxmi , Advocates

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L- 22012 / 161/ 2006- IR ( CM - II ) dated 29-11-2006 referred the following dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of M/ s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , and their workman . The reference is:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of M/s . Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , in dismissing [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] 1924

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/ CHAITRA 28 , 1931

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT Sri Byrineni Chandraiah w.e.f. 14-12-2000 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

Present

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 2/2007 and notices issued to the parties .

SHRI VED PRAKASH GAUR , Presiding Officer

Dated the 10th day of February , 2009

Industrial Dispute No. 40/2007

BETWEEN

The R. Raja Ram,

2. On 6-2-2009, case called out for filing of claim statement by Petitioner , Petitioner called absent while Respondent counsel is present . Though this case is pending since February, 2007. Petitioner has not filed claim statement . As such , the case is closed for want of claim statement . Hence , a Nil Award is passed. Transmit.

General Sccretary,

Singareni Coal Mines Labour Union, (INTUC) , INTUC Bhavan , Godavarikhani- 505209 . Petitioner Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 6th day of February , 2009.

AND

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer

The General Manager ,

Appendix ofevidence

M/ s . Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. ,

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner NIL

Ramagundam- IV Division,

Godavarikhani - 505209 . .....Respondent Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL

APPEARANCES

Documents Marked for the Petitioner

Forthe Petitioner :

NIL

M/ s . A. Sarojana , & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

For the Respondent: M/s . P.A.V.V.S. Sarma, Advocates

AWARD

नई दिल्ली, 24 मार्च , 2009

TheGovernment of India , Ministry of Labour by its OrderNo. L- 22012/ 115/ 2005 - IR (CM - II) dated 11-7-2006 referred the following dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between themanagement ofM/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. and their workman . The reference is:

SCHEDULE

का.आ. 1023.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्य 40/2006) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/ 115/2005- आई. आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 24th March, 2009

"Whether the action of the ChiefGeneral Manager , M/ s . Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Ramagundam - IV Division , Godavarikhani in imposing penalty of stoppage oftwo increments due on 1-4-1995 and 1-4-1996 without specifying with or without cumulative effect in the order to Sh . Md . Abdul Khader as per Standing Order of the Company is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief he is entitled to ? "

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 40/2006 and notices issued to the parties .

S.O. 1023. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 40/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M/ s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24-3-2009.

[No. L- 22012/ 115/2005 - IR (CM- II)]

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

2. On 10-2-2009 , case called out for filing of claim statement by Petitioner , Petitioner called absent while Respondent's counsel is present . Petitioner has not filed claim statement even after two and half years of receipt of this reference . It appears Petitioner is not interested to भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

pursue this case . As such , a Nil Award is.passed in absence of claim statement . Transmit .

Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant, transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 10th day of February , 2009.

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer Appendixofevidence

NIL Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL Documents Marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली, 24 मार्च , 2009

का.आ. 1024.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मिलिट्री डेयरी फार्मस् के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद मे केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , कोलकत्ता के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 29/2000) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-140012/93/99- आईआर ( डी.यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 24th March, 2009

S.O. 1024. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 29/2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court , Kolkata as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Military Dairy Farms and their workman , receivedby the Central Government on 24-3-2009.

[No. L- 14012/93/99- IR (DU) ]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, AT KOLKATA Reference No. 29 of2000

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Dy. Director , Military Dairy Farms

AND

Their workmen

1925

PRESENT

Mr. Justice C.P. Mishra, Presiding Officer APPEARANCES

Onbehalf of the : Management M/s. D.K. Mukherjee, Advocate

M/ s . J.C. Consul , Advocate Onbehalf of the : Workmen

State: West Bengal Industry: Warehousing.

Dated: 18th March, 2009 .

AWARD

By its order No. L- 14012/93 /99 - IR (DU) date 30-6-2000 theGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of its powers under Section 10( 1 ) (d) and (2A) of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Military Dairy Farms, Kalkata in terminating the services of S/Sh. Prahlad Ram, Sita Ram (now expired) and Bahadur and not paying retrenchment and other financial benefits to Sh. Bahadur and legal heirs of Sh . Prahlad Ram and Sita Ram is legal and justified ? if not , to what relief the concerned workmen are entitled ? "

2. The reference has been made at the instance of the three workmen Prahlad Ram , Sita Ram and Bahadur who all have now expired seeking relief for paying retrenchment and other consequential benefits to them and to their legal heirs . According to all ofthem they had joined the services of Military Dairy Farms , Kolkata on 21st January, 1951 , 1st April , 1962 and 21st December , 1965 respectively . The detail particulars of the concerned workmen regarding their date of birth etc. has been given in paragraph 4 of the written statement in this regard. It is also stated that after their joining the duties there was medical examination in the Command Hospital and services records were also prepared. They were required to work 14 to 16 hours a day without any weekly off and they were not paid any such overtime allowance for working beyond 8 hours and also no such payment was made to them for working on sundays and other holidays . As a token they were marked absent in each on the plea that the work of Dairy Farm is of continous nature and since sanctioned posts were not available they were to be paid legal dues after receiving sanction only. In February , 1972 8. post of farm hands were received , but the concerned workmen were not paid their outstanding dues , nor they were given any such appointment though they had worked continuously for such a long period by that time. In this connection , on their representation made they were informed that since they were over - age , no such benefit could be given to them. The matter was also taken up by them to the concerned authorities for their regular apointment and also 1926

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] for payment oftheir wages under the provisions of payment ofWages Act and also in this connection a case was also filed before the Chief Judge , Small Causes Court , Kolkata and the Appellate Court who had allowed the appeal and held theseworkmen to be entitled to the amount so payable to them in this connection. Against that judgment writ petitions, however, are still pending before the Hon'ble High Court for its final adjudication . The managementhad, however, refused to give them work on one pretext or the other and on their representation the matter was taken up by the Regional Labour Commissioner ( Central ) in conciliation proceedings but without any result. On 12th May, 1989 Prahlad also had died leaving behind him his son and wife who also made a similar request for an early settlement of the dispute . The said refusal made by the management to give work and employment to all the three workmen is quite illegal , erroneous as perverse and no chargesheet or show cause notice had ever been issued against any one of them about any such termination of their services in this regard . Therefore , a relief of reinstatement of all the three aforesaid workmen and after death to their legal heirs by giving appointment on compassionate ground together with compensation , bonus etc. has been prayed on their behalf through this reference .

the Q.M.G. , New Delhi . A case for relaxation was also sponsored to the Director, Military Farms , Head Quarters on 10th February, 1972. Provisional appointment, however, could not be given effect to as the workmen concerned had not complied Clause 3 (b) (c) , 3 ( e) , 3 ( g) and 3 (m) of their appointment letter but only a representation was made bythem. Since there was no rule for relaxation of age which the Q.M.G. could so relax in case of these workmen . The ageprescribed for the post of Farmhand as per rules is 25 years and there being no proof of age of these workmen having been furnished by them, the assesment was made by the medical authorities who found them to be over - age and found them unfit for their appointment as Farmhand/ Butterman as they have so claimed in this regard. It is evident that there exists no provision for relaxation of age as per rules . These workmen had also filed a case under the Payment ofWages Act being 99 of 1972 , 100 of 1972, and 101 of 1972 for difference of wages to be paid to them for the period June , 1972 to September , 1980 that was so allowed in their favour, but against these an appeal was filed by the management and it was allowed by the Appellate Courtto which a writ is pending in the Hon'ble High Court as the said writ petition has been filed by the workmen against that order. But this matter has got no concern to the claim of the workmen so far as the relief claimed by them through this reference for their reinstatement etc. and also that there is no question of any such absorption of these workmen in the regular employment of Military Dairy Farm . It is also evident that all of them while working on daily basis had themselves left the service on their own accord and as such any such claim for retrenchment benefit does not arise in their favour . Besides that the management has also raised a legal plea about non -maintainability of the dispute as the Military Dairy Farm is not and industry, nor all these persons come within the difinition of the workman as defined in the industrial disputes Act, 1947 and also that their dispute has not been so raised by any registered trade union and moreover the cause of action which is said to have arisen in 1972 is also time barred and with the demise of all these three workmen there is no question of giving any such employment either to them or to their legal heirs as so claimed by them through this referenc. It is also been stated by the management that all these workmen were in fact so removed from their services on 11th April, 1977 when they had been asked to go and join their duties at Panagarh , which was another Military Farm but they did not comply with the said order and as such they ceased to work from that date as such and not entitled to get any such relief as claimedbythem .

3. The management has also filed its written statement denying the aforesaid claim and contentions of all the three workmen by saying that they were all engaged offand on in the Military Dairy Farm for their work of labour and there is a denial ofthe details of the work as so given by them to show for the period of their work from 1951 to 1962 as it is so mentioned in their written statement for the same in this connection. They were first engaged as per work requirement from time to time by the management and they never had so worked against any sanctioned post of Butterman in the establishment of Military Dairy Farm, Kolkata as there was no such vacancy in the existing postof Butterman of the establishment at that time . The said employees were only daily rated mazdoors and their names were never so sponsored by the Employment Exchange . As the vacancies arose , daily labourers already inemployment at Military Dairy Farm however were to be given preference for a regular employment provided their names had been so sponsored by the Employment Exchange and also that they fulfilled other conditions of age and health etc in this connection . On 1st February, 1972 Officer - in -charge , Military Dairy Farm , Kolkata no doubt had sponsored the cases of 8 daily labourers for their absorption on regular basis showing the names ofthe three workmen as well at Serial No. 6 , 7 and 9 but, they could not be so employed as they were not eligible being of over - age . They were only issued a provisional appointment letter on the condition that their appointment couldbe void ifrelaxation of age etc was not so granted by

4. The workmen have also filed a rejoinder denying the claim and contentions of the management as it was so made against them in this regard . Regarding the period of 1927 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

work done' be them it is stated in paragraph 12 that they had so worked there upto June , 1977 at different intervals which has been for more than 240 days in a year' and refusal ofemployment to them without any notice and payment of retrenchment compensation by the management is contrary to the provisions of Section 25F of the Act . They have also denied of having received any such order of transfer for going to Panagarh , either orally or in writing by the management so given to them and no question of any such refusal on their part could arise as it was so alleged by the management against them to make such refusal on their part against these workmen .

appointment of the heirs of the dead persons and also consequential benefits . In cross-examination the witness has stated that the other two deceased workmen were older than him but he does not know name of their village . At the time ofhis deposition admittedly he was of 58 years or so.He was born in Rangoon and he fled therefrom in 1965 . He came to know from Prahlad and Sitaram about their period ofworkings as casual daily rated workers . It is his evidence that none of them had got any birth certificates in their favour. He did not know that till 1972 there was no vacancy in the establishment, but he knew that in 1972 five persons were absorbed out of the eight names sent for the purpose and he named them all. He , however has admitted that they continued as casual labourers thereafter and when they were asked to go Panagarh in 1977, they had refused to go as no written order was so given to them in this connection . He has further stated that when he entered the service he was more than 22 years old .

5. Some documents have been exhibited on behalf of the workmen . Ext . W- 1 is a letter dated 8-02-1972 provisionally selecting and offering the temporary post of farm Hand to Shri Prahlad issued by the Deputy Director of Military Farm . Ext . W-2 is also a similar letter of same date issued to Shri Sitaram. Ext . W- 3 is also similar letter dated Februry, 1972 issued to Shri Bahadur. Ext . W-4 is the minutes ofthe meeting dated 25-02-1999 before the ALC (C) kolkata. Ext. W-4 is a letter dated May, 1999 issued to Shri D.K. Mukherjee , Advocate by the Officer incharge , Military Farm ,Kolkata . Ext . W- 6 is the details of attendance of the concerned workmen . Ext . W- 7 is the judgment dated 16-02-1977 passed by the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act, West Bengal in Case No.99, 100 and 101 of 1972. Ext . W- 8 is the signature of Bahadur one of the concerned workmen on the letter dated 10-10-1974 addressed to R.L.C. Ext . W - 9 is the endorsement ofreceipt in the letter dated 20-06-1977 . Ext. W- 10 is the letter dated 6-03-1978 of Mr. J.C. Cousul , Advocate to the Deputy Director, Military Farm. Ext . W- 11 is letter dated 10-04-1978 addressed to R.L.C. and Ext . W- 12 is acknowledgement of the letter dated -2-03-1992 addressed to Officer - in- charge , Military Dairy Farm . Management, however , chose not to exhibit any document on its behalf.

WW-2, Patiram Chamar is the son of late Prahlad one of the concerned workmen in this case who also died on 12-06-1989 . He has deposed on behalf of all the three concerned workmen . He has described his father as Prahlad Ram Chamar . He has stated in his evidence that all of them used to work in the Dairy Farm and used to reside in the quarters built by themselves adjacent to the Dairy Farm. His mother, Fulmati Devi and brother, Rajkumar Ram prayed for employment on compassionate ground as Prahlad had diedwhile in service. All the three persons concerned were retrenched by the Company . Shanti Devi the widow of deceased Sitaram had also prayed for service on compassionate ground . According to him Prahlad joined service in January, 1951 , Sitaram in December, 1962 and Bahadur in 1964. Although 8 posts were sanctioned in 1972 these three persons were not adjusted against those posts and they were ultimately removed from service on 11th April , 1977. They were however asked to go and join at Panagarh , but no letter was given to them ever for this purpose. He has further stated that at the time of their removal neither any retrenchment notice was issued nor any compensation was so paid by the management . He has prayed for back wages for them and also service for the legal heirs ofthe deceased workmen in this connection . In cross - examination he has stated that Prahlad was born in the year 1933 but he could not say about the others . All the three were casual workers and also that they did not have any such document regarding their date of birth and so they were medically examined at that time. He has admitted that in 1972 the medical board had declared the age of Prahlad, Sitaram and Bahadur as 38,30 and 32 years respectively. He also could not say whether any certificate was granted to his sons mentioning them as Chamar by caste .

WW-3 , Smt . Chaya Das has stated in her evidence that they are Chamar by caste and his father who died 19 years due to illness used to work in the Dairy Farm at 6. Four witnesses have been examined on behalf oftheworkinen . WW- 1 , Bahadur has deposed not only for himself but also for the other two deceased concerned workmen . He has stated in his evidence that he had joined service in the Dairy Farm in 1965 as a labour and Prahlad and Sitaram joined in 1951 and 1962 respectively. There were 22/23 persons working in the Dairy Farm and Prahlad was engaged in the manufacturing of butter. They worked continuously , even on holidays and paid salary in each month after deducting one day's pay. He has also stated about the case filed in 1972 under the Payment of Wages Act which was decided in their favour but it is pending before the Hon'ble High Court . He has further stated that after the appeal was allowed in the above referred case, their work ceased and they were asked to go to Panagarh. However, no written order was handedover to them inspite ofdemand . In the year 1972 8 posts were created but those posts were not given to them on the ground that they were overaged . He has prayed for reinstatement and 1928

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/ CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] Remount Road, Kolkata. In cross -examination she has stated that she has married a Bengali whose surname is Das but she does not know his caste . She does not have any paper to show that her caste is Chamar.

WW-4 , Jagadish Yadav hs also deposed on behalf of the three deceased workmen . He has stated that Prahlad was the first among them to join Military Dairy Farm. Prahlad and Sitaram happened to be of Chamar by caste. Permanent posts were received in 1972 but these three persons did not get those posts on the ground that they were over- aged. They allwere removed on 12-06-1977 without payment of any retrenchment compensation . In cross -examination he has stated that his father Bahadur also had so deposed in this case as WW- 1 and whatever he had deposed here are all correct facts in this regard . He has stated his age to be 39 years as he was born in 1963 in Burma. He came to Kolkata in the year 1966. He has claimed to have seen the caste certificates of the three grandsons of Prahlad . He also has denied that the workmen had so left their work of their own as alleged by the management against them in this connection.

7. MW- 1 , Hrish Chandra Malhotra is the sole witness examined by the management in this case . He has stated in his evidence that joined the Military Dairy Farm on 15-12-1994 as Upper Division Clerk and had so worked there till 31-05-2001 . He , however , does not have any personal knowledge about the present case . He actually has stated nothing which can throw any light in respect of the matter in controversy as it has been so raised by either side in this case regarding allegations made in their respective written statement .

8. Before entering into the merit of the case it is necessary to consider some legal pleas as it has been so raised on behalf of the management regarding the maintainability of this reference and also about the plea of limitation bar to challenge the claim of the workmen in this regard. It has been submitted for this that the matter is highly belated since it relates to the year 1977 and also that all the three workmen have now expired and as suchthere is no question of giving any such relief to them at all after such a long period . It is also submitted that the claim ofthe workmen does not so lie against the Military Dairy Farm which cannot be said to be an industry as defined under Section 2(j ) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act. 1947.

Board v. A. Rajappa, ( 1978) 2 S.C.C.213 : 1978 SCC ( L & S ) 215 by the Hon'ble Apex Court that even departments discharging sovereign functions , if there are units which are industries and they are substantially severable then they can be considered to come within Section 2 (j ) of the Act . Whether a particular function of the State is or is not a sovereign function depends on the nature of the power and manner of its exercise . In the case of Chief Conservator of Forests v. Jagannnath Maruti Kondhare , ( 1996 ) 2SCC 293:1996 SCC ( L & S) 500 the Hon'ble Apex Court in this connection had also so held , i.e. , Pachgaon Parwati Scheme in Pune District and social foresting work in Ahmednagar District undertaken by the Forests dept . of the State Government of Maharashtra which was held to be and industry and not a part of sovereign functions of the state as it was so argued on behalf of the Forest Dept. in this case. So it can be said in the present case where the Military Dairy Farm admittedly also has been doing the work relating to the work of military dairy which cannot be said to be a part ofthe sovereign function of the State so as to exclude itfrom the definition of industry as it is so provided in the provisions of Section 2 (j ) of the Act which is quite wide enough to show it otherwise . So it can be said regarding the plea of limitation as it has been so raised by the management since the concerned workmen all along had been seeking their remedy for payment of wages to them and also for their absorption in the service and in this conciliation proceedings were also so undertaken and at one time they had raised their dispute for the same before the Hon'ble High Court as well in this regard and this reference has been made thereafter for its adjudication by the Central Government to this Tribunal in the year 2000. Therefore, it cannot be said to be time - barred to reject the claims ofthe workmen on this very ground . As regards the right of the legal heirs of the deceased workmen who have now expired, it is evident that the claim has also been preferred on their behalf about challenging termination order so passed against them about termination of their services and whatever relief and amount would be so payable to them or during their life time can very well be paid to their legal heirs as well. Also that a clear provision in Section 10 ( 8) of the Act is also there which provides that no proceedings pending before a Labour Court , Tribunal or National Tribunal in relation to an industrial dispute shall lapse merely by reason of the death of any of the parties to the dispute being a workman , and such Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal shall complete such proceedings and submit its award to the appropriate government accordingly.

10. As regards merits of the claims of these workmen it is evident that the action of the management in terminating the services of these three workmen is being challenged through this reference . Admittedly they all have now expired and it is now being challenged on their behalf by 9. I have considered all these pleas as so raised on behalf of the management but found no force therein as the Military Dairy Farm in no way be said to have been doing any sovereign functions of the state so as to show that itis not covered by the definition of industry as defined in Section 2(j ) of the Act . Sovereign functions , strictly understood, alone qualify for exception but not the welfare activities or ecoomic adventures undertaken by Government or statutory bodies as it was so held in the Full Bench case of Bangalore Water Supply & Sewerage 1929 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

in this connection. There is no order in fact in writing so passedby the management nor there is any such fact or for holding any enquiry as such into the charges framed about it against the said workmen that they did not so comply any such order of transfer by the management so issued to themto join at Panagarh and so that there could have been any such occasion for terminating their services on that very ground as it is so alleged against them by the management at this stage . All these workmen have denied any such refusal ever made by them or any such order was so given to them in writing so that any inference can be drawn that they had really so refused their job of their own and so their services could have been so terminated on that very ground by the management as it has been so alleged against them by the management in this case.

their legal heirs saying that the order of termination which was passed against them on 11-04-1977 was clearly illegal and void for want of compliance ofthe provisions of Section 25F ofthe Act since they all had clearly so completed their services for more than 240 days before the said order of termination was so passed against them by the management in this regard. Neither any notice was so served upon them nor any amount of compensation was paid to them at all and as such they have claimed the relief for their reinstatement and since they are now dead this relief may begranted to their legal heirs for both their appointment in service on compassionate ground and also for paying them required compensation in this coonnection as prayed by them through this reference . The management not in so many words has so challenged the period of their work done by all these three workmen in this regard and particularly to the oral and documentary evidence so led by the workmen for the same in this connection . No doubt initial burden lies on the workmen to prove the facts about the period ofwork so done by them in this connection and it has been done by them in a positive way by the evidence sogiven by them in this regard . WW- 1 , Bahadur one of the concerned workmen who had deposed all these facts about the same saying that he and the other two deceased workmenhadjoined the service as labour in the year 1965 , 1951, 1962 and had so continued to work there till the year 1977 when they had been asked to go to Panagarh without giving anything in writing to them and on the contrary their services were so terminated with effect from 11-04-1977 illegally. So it was stated by the other witnesses WW-2, Patiram Chamar son of other workman Prahlad and WW-3 , Smt. Chaya Das and WW-4 , Jagadish Yadav to state the facts in a similar way. Thus the oral evidence and the document furnished on behalf of the workmen , i.e. , Ext.W-6 wherein the details of attendance etc. was so given bythe own officer ofthe Dairy Farm relating to these three concerned workmen on its own showing go to show and fully substantiate the facts about the period of work so done by them in this connection , i.e. , all of them had so worked in theMilitary Dairy Farm for more than 240 days in a year preceding the date of termination of their services which was so done by the management on 11-04-1977 in thisconnection as it is so alleged on its behalf.

12. Learned Advocate for the management further has also challenged the claim of these workmen by saying that they were only the daily wagers and they had no right to the cost as claimed by them in this regard. There is no question of their absorption or regularization to grant any such relief to their legal heirs as well for their appointment on compassionate ground as all the workmen had been just engaged off and on in the Military Dairy Farm for doing their work of labour for different period as per work requirement and so they had never so worked against any sanctioned vacancy or to a post of Butterman in the establishment of Military Dairy Farm at that time . It is also submitted that their names were also never so sponsored by the Employment Exchange . At one time , no doubt, their names were recommended by the officers of the management, but they could not be appointed since they were found to be not eligible to be so appointed being over-age and for that only a provisional appointment letter was issued to them on the condition that their apointment could be void ifrelaxation of age was not so granted by the higher authorities in this connection. He has referred to the case of Himanshu Kumar Vidyarthi & Ors . V. State of Bihar & Ors . , JT 1997 (4 ) SC 560 in this connection to say that termination of service of temporary employees who were only daily wagers had no right to post and their disengagement from service cannot be treated to be a dispute under the industrial Disputes Act. He also relied upon 2006 (8) Supreme 29 (Surendra Prasad Tewari v. Uttar Pradesh Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad & Ors. ) to say that it wouldbe improper for the Courts to give direction for regularization of services of the person who is working either as daily wager, adhoc employee , probationer , temporary or contractual employee not appointed following the procedure laid down. He further placed reliance on a recent decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Secretary , State of Karnataka & Ors . V. Umadevi (3 ) & Ors ., (2206) 4 S.C.C.1 saying that the Hon'ble Apex Court has clearly observed therein that Courts should not issue such 11. According to the management, however, all the said three workmen had left the job on 11-4-1977 of their own when they had been asked to go to join their duties at Panagarh another Military Farm but they did not go there and as such there could be no fault of the management in passing the order of termination oftheir services thereafter in these circumstances . But for this there is , however, no order in writing as so filed by the management to show that any such direction was really so given to the concerned workmen so that they could have so joined there at Panagarh

1330 GI/09-25 1930

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL, 18, 2009/CHAITRA 28, 1931

[PART I SEC. 3( ii) ] direction unless the recruitment itself was made regularly and in terms of the Constitutional scheme for public employment, absorption, regularization or making them permanent in this regard . Continuance of temporary, contractual , casual , daily wage or ad hoc employees appointed/recruited and continued for long in public employment dehors the Constitutional scheme of public employment and any such employeedo not have any right to regular or permanent public employment in this connection . TheHon'ble Court clearly so observed therein that issuance of such direction amounts to creating another mode of public employment which is not permissible .

follow that if the name ofthe workman is struck offthe rol) that itselfwould constitute retrenchment as for this it was so observed by the Hon'ble Apex Court specifically in the case of Delhi Cloth and General Mill's case (supra) . Admittedly, in this case any such disciplinary proceedings were not so drawn against the workmen and also that there was no such voluntary retirenent soughtby them or refusal madeby the workman so as to attract the provisions ofany such exception given to the Section 2(oo) of the Act as referredto above for making any such order of termination oftheir services as it has been done by the management in this case and as such it is clearly illegal . Since all the above three workmen have now expired and also their date of birth as shown in paragraph 4 of the written statement also go to show that by the time this reference was so made theymust have reached the age of superannuation as well and therefore, the question of giving any such benefit to them for their reinstatement in the service could not arise in this case even if the order of termination is held to be illegal and void for want of compliance ofthe provisions of Section 25F of the Act in this regard . It is also true that they all had been working as daily wager or casual worker and there was no regular selection of them as their names were also so sponsored by the Employment Exchange for any sanctioned vacancy being available there with the management for which they could have been so recruited and so their appointment all along had been that ofa casual worker only. They had worked for number of years and at one time their names were also so recommended for their regular appointment by the management to the higher authorities aßer relaxing their age , but the same could not be legallydone being of over age reasons and therefore , the question of giving them any further benefit of a regular appointment does not arise at all . In view of the above even ifthe order of termination which was so passed against them without compliance ofthe provisions of Section 25F ofthe Act, there is no question of granting any relief of reinstatement in their favour and only relief that couldbe so granted to them is just an amount of compensation in thisregard.

14. All the concerned workmen admittedly have now expired andthe compensation which is the only relief payable to them and their legal heirs and for that it is just and proper that the legal heirs of the concerned workmen may be so awarded an amount of compensation , i.e. , Rs. 25000 (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) to the aforesaid three workmen and since they have expired , to their legal heirs in the given facts and circumstances ofthe caseaccordingly.

This is my Award .

C. P. MISHRA, Presiding Officer 13. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as put by either side it is evident that no notice or compensation was given to all these workmen and as such it clearly amounts to retrenchment of their services as it is so defined under the provisions of Section 2( 00) of the Act and the provisions of Chapter- VA provided in respect of retrenchment of such workman which is so applicable in the case of these workmen who had admittedly so put their services for a period which was more than 240 days in a year preceding the date of their termination, i.e. , 11-04-1977 . It is evident that under Section 25F of the Act one month's notice and retrenchment compensation is a must required to be followed before any such order of termination of their services is so passed against the workmen which admittedly has not been done so by the management in this regard as per allegations made by it that all the workmen had left the job of their own when they had been asked to go tojoin there at Panagarh in this connection. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of StateBank ofIndia v. N. Sundaramony, AIR 1976 SC 1111 ; Robert L.D' Souza v. Executive Engineer, Southern Railway, 1982-1 -LLJ - 330; Delhi Cloth & General Mills v . Shambhu NathMukherjee . AIR 1978 SC 8 and Mohan Lal v. Bharat Electronics Ltd. , 1981 Lab 1.C. 806 (SC) clearly held that Section 2(00) is so clear and unambiguous that no external aid is necessary for its proper construction. The well-settled position in law is that if termination of service of a workanan is brought about for any reason whatsoever, it shouldbe retrenchment except it the case falls within any of the excepted categories i.e. ( i) termination byway of punishment inflicted pursuant to disciplinary action; ( ii ) Voluntary retirement ofthe workman; ( iii ) Retirement ofthe workman on reaching the age of superannuation if the contract of emloyment between the employer and the workman concerned contains a stipulation in that behalf and (iv)Termination of the service on the ground of continued ill- health . Once the case does not fall in any of the excepted categories , the termination of service even if it be automatic discharge from service under agreement would nonetheless be termed retrenchment within the meaning of the expression of Section 2( oo) of the Act . It must as a corollary

Dated, Kolkata The 18th March,2009 1931 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 24 मार्च, 2009

I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of M/ s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , and their workman. The reference is :

SCHEDULE

का.आ. 1025.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं एस.सी.सी. एल, के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीस सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 45/2006) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the action of the Management of M/ s . Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Ramagundam - I Division , Godavarikhani in dismissing of Sri Erukula Rajaiah, General Mazdoor , Godavarikhani- 6N Inc. , Ramagundam -1 Division , from service w.e.f. 10-1-2005 is legal and Justified ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled ? " [सं. एल-22012/246/2005- आई. आर ( सीएम-- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 24th March , 2009

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 45/2006 and notices issued to the parties .

2. On 2-2-2009 , case called out for filing of claim statement by petitioner , Petitioner called absent while Respondent's counsel is present. Petitioner has not filed claim statement even after two years of receipt of this reference, as such, it appears that Petitioner is not interested to pursue this case . Accordingly , a Nil Award is passed in absence of claim statement . Transmit .

S.O. 1025.-In Pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.45/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M/s . Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd, and their workmen , received bythe Central Government on 24-3-2000.

Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 2nd day of February, 2009.

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer Appendix of evidence

[No. 1-22012/246/2005 - IR (CM - II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, DeskOfficer ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

NIL

Present : Shri Ved Prakash Gaur , PresidingOfficer Dated, the 2nd day of February, 2009

Industrial Dispute No.45/2006

Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL

BETWEEN

Sri Mudiganti Karunakar Reddy ,

Godavarikhani - 505209

Petitioner

Branch Secretary, Singareni Coal Mines , Labour Union ( INTUC) , Ramagundam Branch- 1 , ......

Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL Documents marked for the Respondent NIL

AND

The General Manager ,

नई दिल्ली, 26 मार्च , 2009

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Ramagundam -I Division ,

Godavarikhani - 505209

......Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the Petitioner : Nil

For the Respondent : M/s . P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & P. Vijaya Laxmi , Advocates

AWARD

क़ा.आ. 1026. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मिलिट्री फार्म के प्रबंधितंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद मे केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकराम नं. -1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 63/1999 ) को प्रकाशित क्ररती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-14012/40/98- आईआर(डीयू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी The Government of India , Ministry of Labour by its order No.L-22012/246/2005 - IR( CM - II), dated 2-8-2006 referred the following dispute under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) ofthe 1932

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28, 1931

New Delhi , the 26th March, 2009

were terminated against the provisions of Section 25G and Hofthe Industrial Disputes Act. He had worked more than 240 days in every calendar year . He worked with the department but his services were terminated without any notice, one month salary in lieu of the notice and terminal dues. On the basis of the above facts the workman has prayed for setting aside the termination order and for an order of his reinstatement into the services with full back wages.

S.O. 1026.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.63/1999) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court, No. - I , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Military Farm and their workman, whichwas received by the Central Government on 26-3-2009.

[No. L- 14012/40/96- IR(DU)]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1, CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D 63/99

Shri Uma Shankar , C/o Gen. Secy. H.P. AITUC , Saproon , Distt, Solan (Himachal Pradesh) 173211 .

...... Applicant

VERSUS

Management of respondent Military Farm has contested the claim of the prtitioner by filing written statement. It is admitted to the management that after the termination of the services of the workman few fresh hands namely Shri Parmanand, Shri Jagdish and Shri Prem Chand were provided with the job for smooth working of the farm. Itwas further contended by the management that services of the workman Shri Uma Shankar were taken against the leave vacancy. He abandoned the job in Oct. 1997. Prior to providing the job to Shri Parmanand, Shri Jagdish and Shri Prem Chand, he was orally asked to work with the management of Military Farm , but he did not turn up . On his abandonment of the job, the three persons namely Parmanand , Jagdish , Prem Chand were provided with the work. The workman has not completed 240 days in any of the calendar year and he is not entitled for any relief.

(1 ) The Manager/ Officer Incharge , Military Farm , Dagshai , Distt, Solan (Himachal Pradesh ) 173211 .

(2) The Director, Military Farms , H.O. Western Compound

(FarmBr.) Chandimandir 134107.

Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the Workman:

Sri J. C. Bhardwaj

Sri K. K. Thakur

For the Management:

Bothofthe parties were afforded the opportunity for adducing evidence. Both of the parties filed their respective affidavits which were considered as the Chief- examination of the deponents . Shri Uma Shankar , the workman was cross -examined by learned counsel for the management . But the management of Military Frams failed to produce the witnesses whose affidavit was on record . Accordingly , vide order dated 10-10-08 the evidence of the management AWARD

Passed on: 23-2-2009

Government of India vide notification No. L-14012/ 40/ 98 - IR( DU) , dated 16-2-1999 referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :--

"Whether the action of Director, Military Farm , Head Quarter Western Command , Farm Branch , Chandimandir and Manager /Office Incharge , Military Farm, Dagshai in terminating the services ofShri Uma Shankar , Ex-Farm Hand is legal and justified? If not, to what reliefthe workman is entitled? "

was closed and it was further directed that the affidavit filed by the management shall not be relied upon because the deponent was not subjected to cross -examination . Opportunity for arguments was given to both of the parties . Learned Counsels for both of the parties argued the matter and file was reserved for award . Thus , it is unrebutted evidence adduced by the workman. Few facts have been admitted by the management . In Para 2 of written statement at one place it is mentioned that in October 1997 workman was orally advised to report for duty against leave vacancy but he did not report . Whereas, in middle and last para of this paragraph , the management has further alleged that , however on engagement of another person , on 14th October, 1997 the workman approached through written request for his employment and he was advised that as and when any leave vacancy occurs he will be adjusted for employment but thereafter , the applicant did not come for employment . Thiscontrary contention of the management itself proved that the workman has not abandoned his job but was very cautious about his right to get the work . As admitted by On perusal ofthe pleadings ofthe parties, it is evident that workman raised the industrial dispute on the ground that he worked with the management from December 1992 to 8-10-1997. Thereafter, he was not permitted to work with the management without assigning any reasons and without notice or retrenchment compensation . Juniors to him namely Shri Parmanand , Shri Jagdish and Shri Prem Chand were provided with the job whereas , his services 1933 भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

cent per annum from the date of filing the claim petition till the final payment . The reference is, accordingly, answered. Central Government be informed and thereafter , file be consigned.

G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 26 मार्च , 2009

the management that just after 14 days of engagement of Shri Parmanand, Shri Jagdish and Shri Prem Chand, the workman made a written request for getting the job which was refused by the management . Thus , violation of Section 25 H is admitted by the management . Nodoubt, it isfurther contended by the management that after January 1998, all the three workman namely Shri Parmanand, Shri Jagdish and Shri Prem Chand were also disengaged. Inthis regard I am of the view that intention of legislation if otherwise . If any fresh recruit is given the work for a day only that constitute the violation of the right of the workman protected under Section 25 H of the Industrial Disputes Act.

का.आ. 1027. - औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.बी.एम.बी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. - 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 17/94 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/ 126/92- आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi, the 26th March, 2009

S.O. 1027. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 17/94) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court, No. - 1 Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of B.B.M.B. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 26-3-2009 .

The workman has further pleaded that he has worked for 240 days in the preceding year from the date of his termination but he has not filed any evidence regarding the violation of his right protected under Section 25 G of the Act. He has summarily mentioned in his affidavit that he worked for 240 days without providing other evidence and material in corroboration to this contention . Moreover , the workman has also admitted in his cross-examination that he was appointed against a leave vacancy. The work against the leave vacancy was available with the management which was not given to the workman but was provided to the fresh recruits . Thus, even against the leave vacancies it was the right of the workman to get the work at the place of three fresh recruits.

[No. L-42012/ 126/ 92- IR ( DU ) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR, COURT- 1, CHANDIGARH.

Onthe basis of the above observation , I am of the view that the workman has proved the violation ofhis right under Section 25 H of the Act, whereas , he failed to prove the violation of his right under Section 25 G of the Act . There is no evidence on record that workman has completed 240 days ofwork with the management in the preceding year from the date ofhis termination . Moreover, he worked against the leave vacancy as admitted by him.

Case No. I.D. 17/94

Shri R.K. Singh , General Secretary , Nangal , Bhakra Mazdoor Sangh, Head Office , Nangal Township , Distt.- Ropar.

Applicant

VERSUS

The Chief Engineer, BSL Project . BBMB . Sundernagar , Distt, -Mandi . (Himachal Pradesh ) .

Respondent

APPEARANCES

Sri R. K. Singh Sri D. L. Sharma

For the Workman : For theManagement:

AWARD

Passed on: 23-2-2009

Thus, the remedy in this case for violation of the right of the workman under Section 25 H of the Act lies in the compensation to the workman . Whenever Tribunal decides to provide a compensation, the same should be based on a reasonable criteria and in this case the criteria is the wages of the workman which he could have received, if he had given the opportunity to work in place of the fresh recruits .Moreover , the depreciation in money and interest accrued on such amount shall be taken into consideration . In my view, the amount of Rs . 25,000 (twenty five thousand) willbe a reasonable compensation to meet the ends ofjustice. The management of respondent military farm is, accordingly , directed to deposit an amount of Rs . 25000 in the Tribunal within one month from the date of publication ofthis award. If the amount is deposited within one month from the date of publication, the workman will not be entitled for any interest, failing which he will be entitled to the interest on said amount at the rate of 8 per

133091109-24 1934

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii )] Government of India vide notification No.L- 42012/ 126/92- IR(DU) , dated 10-1-94 referred the following industrial dispute for Judicial adjudication to this Tribunal:-

"Whether the action of the management of BSL Project, BBMB , Sundernagar in not regularizing the services of Smt . Ram Pyari W/ o Late Sh . Khushi Ram is legal and justified? If not, to what relief she is entitled to ? "

2. There is no iota of evidence on record that the services of any juniors to the workman were regularized beforethe regularization of her services . The workman is counting the period she served in different phases for regularization of her services . Once any workman is retrenched as per the provisions of law, he /she has only oneright available to get the work on priority under Section 25 H of the Industrial Disputes Act . In the present case this right ofthe workman was protected by the management and she was again and again provided with the work . On perusal ofthe materials on record , it is evident that without violating the seniority list , which was prepared on the direction of Hon'ble the High Court Himachal Pradesh at Shimla, the services of the workman were regularized by thedepartment.

On perusal of the materials on record, it is evidently clear that Smt . Ram Pyari was engaged by the management ondemise of her husband at his place . She was engaged ondailywages in December, 1979 and worked till 31-3-82 . She was again reengaged from 1-8-94 to 13-3-95 in the Hydel Channel and BR Division, Sundernagar , thereafter, from April , 1985to August , 1986 in BBMB Hospital Sundernagar. From 1-9-86 she was working regularly with the management and completed 240 days but his services were not regularized in compliance of the letter of the management no.687-89/BBMB/ 1094/ 80 /P & S/ 34/AOC, dated 30-7-1982 and letter no . 8(Misc .)90-ACH-2 , dated 13-3-1990.

3. It is admitted to the workman that her services were regularized by the management on 4-7-01 and she joined as regular employee with the management vide the said letter. Thus, this petition also become infructious as soon as the workman was appointed as regular employee . Asstated earlier , workman is enable to prove before this Tribunal that any junior to him was benefited with the regularization of services in violation of her right . Accordingly, Smt . Ram Pyari was legally appointed as permanent employee on regularization of her services on 4-7-01 and on her regularization ofher services , this refeence become infructious .

Accordingly, the workman is not entitled to any relief. Central Government be informed, and thereafter, file be consigned.

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 26 मार्च , 2009

The management contested the claim by filing written statement. It was contended by the management that workman has filed writ petitions before Hon'ble High Court ofHimachal Pradesh, Shimla twice on the same and similar cause for regularization of her services and Hon'ble High Court while passing the appropriate orders refused the reliefofregularization . Thus , the present relief regarding regularization of services is barred. It has also been contended by the management that as per the policy of B.B.M.B. the services of Smt. Ram Pyari were regularized vide letter no . 1602-07 dated 4-7-01 . There has been no violation ofany of the letters mentioned by the workman and the services were , as per the seniority list, regularized by the department.

Both ofthe parties were afforded the opportunity of beingheard.

Parties filed their respective affidavits . They were cross -examined by the respective opponents . I have perused entire materials on record and evidence filed/ adduced by the parties oral and documentary.

का.आ. 1028. - औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायलय नं. -1 चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 177/91) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

Iamenableto accept the contention ofthe workman regarding relief sought on the following grounds :-

[सं. एल-40012/87/91- आई.आर. (डी.यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 26th March , 2009 1. Before raising this industrial dispute , Smt . Ram Pyari filed the writ petition before Hon'ble the High Court Himachal Pradesh at Shimla twice for certain relief including the regularization ofher services . Hon'ble the High Court was kind enough to pass the orders for other reliefbut no order on the relief of regularization of her services was passed. Accordingly, Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh had not granted the relief which is again agitated bythe workman in this industrial dispute.

S.O. 1028. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 177/91 ) ofthe CentralGovernment Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, No. - 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their 1935 भारत का राजपत्र: अप्रैल 18, 2009/चैत्र 28, 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

workmen,which was received by the Central Government on26-3-2009.

[No. L-40012/87/91 -IR (DU)]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

send to the parties . In rest of the cases , which were adjourned sine die , parties turned up and the references have been adjudicated/settled. In this reference no one turned up even after the service was sufficient . Thus, this Tribunal vide order dated 12-1-09 and 11-2-09 passed the detailed order regarding adjudication of this reference.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT- I,

CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D. 177/91

Shri Sukhbir Singh S/ o Shri Kirpal Singh , Gandhi Nagar , Anand Bhawan, Charkhi Dadri , Distt . Bhiwani - 123306.

...... Applicant

VERSUS

TheSub-Divisional Officer, Telecom. Department, Bhiwani.

Respondent

APPEARANCES

None

Forthe Workman :.

None

Forthe Management:

AWARD

Passed on: 23-3-2009

It is true that the jurisdiction of this Tribunal is limited and confined to the reference referred by the Central Government but once the actual dispute between the parties has been referred the correction on ancillary issue can be made by the Tribunal . The dispute regarding the termination of service of the workman by the management of respondent has been referred to this tribunal and it is ancillary that services were terminated by SDO, Gurgaon rather SDO, Bhiwani. Notice should have been served upon S.D.O. , Gurgaon to afford him the opportunity of being heard for adjudication of the reference . But it could not be possible . The workman has not turned up even after the service of notice twice . Even after four years no information is given by the Central Government regarding correction of reference . Under such circumstances, where the workman himself opted for correction of reference from Central Government , it will be proper to return the reference to the Central Government with the direction that whenever corrected reference will be received by this Tribunal the same will be adjudicated on priority within the time to be prescribed in the reference. Accordingly, the reference is return to the CentralGovernment as such. Consigned the record.

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 26 मार्च , 2009

Government of India vide notification No. L -40012/ 87/91-1R(DU), dated 13-11-1991 , referred the following industrial dispute for Judicial adjudication to this Tribunal:-

"Whether the action of the management of Telecom Deptt. in relation to their Sub -Divisional Officer , Bhiwani in terminating the services of Shri Sukhbir Singh S/ o Shri Kirpal Singh w.e.f. Sept. 1982 is fair, legal and just ? If not, to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to and from what date ? "

का.आ. 1029.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.बी.एम.बी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 83/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-42011 /3/ 1994- आईआर( सी-11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 26th March, 2009

S.O. 1029. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.83 /95 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. - 1 Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of B.B.M.B. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 26-3-2009.

During the adjudicatory process before this Tribunal , it came to the notice that the services of Shri Sukhbir Singh, the workman, were terminated by the Sub- Divisional Officer, Gurgaon w.e.f. Sept. 1982, whereas, the relief sought bythe workman and the reference referred to this Tribunal by the Central Government was against Sub- Divisional Officer, Bhiwani . It was the objection taken by the management of respondent that it has no concern with this reference. On this objection, this Tribunal adjourn the reference sine die , to get the reference corrected from Central Government . Even after four years no information was given by Central Government about the correction of the reference, nor workman ensured his presence to apprise the Tribunal about the correction of the reference .

[No. L-42011/3/1994 - IR (C - II )] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer.

This Tribunal took the judicial notice in all the references which were adjourned sine die and notice were 1936

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28, 1931

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT-1,

CHANDIGARH

Case No. L.D. 83/95

The President , Nangal , Bhakra Mazdoor Sangh, Nangal Township , Distt . - Ropar(Punjab).

[PART II -SEC. 3 (ii) ] were retrenched according to the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, and all the workmen voluntarily have received the retrenchment compensation . Thereafter , Haryana State Electricity Board and Punjab State ElectricityBoard appointed the workmen in their respective departments and were send to the BBMB as per the policy oftheGovernment . All the workmen have accepted freely fresh appointments on the basis of terms and conditions of appointment letters and they are not entitled for the protection of their pay.

...... Applicant

VERSUS

The Chief Engineer , (Generation ) , Bhakra Beas Management Board, Nangal Township , Distt . - Ropar (Punjab).

Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the Workman :

Sri R. K. Singh

For theManagement: Sri Sukhwinder Singh

AWARD

Passed on: 23-3-2009

Government of India vide notification No. L- 42011/3 /94- IR (DU)/IR( C- II ), dated 19-10-95 referredthe following industrial dispute for Judicial adjudication to this Tribunal :-

"Whether the action of the management of Bhakra Beas Management Board , Nangal Township denying pay protectionto Shri Raja Ram and 22 others is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the concerned workmen are entitled ? "

Onperusal ofthe pleadings ofthe parties , it is evident that main issue before this Tribunal for adjudication is whether the workmen have any right for protection of their wages for the period they worked with BBMB before their regular appointment in Haryana State Electricity Board and Punjab State Electricity Board respectively? There is no controversy on this issue that all the workmen were working as worked incharge workmen with BBMB before their appointment with the Haryana State Electricity Board and Punjab State Electricity Board. It is the contention of the workmen that they continued to work in the same department and in the same capacity even after their appointment with Haryana State Electricity Board and Punjab State Electricity Board; hence , they are entitled for the protection of the salary on fresh appointments . It is also the contention of the workmen that pay of the other similarly placed workmen were protected on regularization oftheir services , whereas , the pay of the present workmen were not protected resulting in violation oftheir fundamental rights enumerated under Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India .

The management contested the above mentioned issue on the contention that the services of the workmen This Tribunal afforded the adequate opportunity for adducing evidence and for hearing to both of the parties. After hearing the parties and perusing all the materials on record including the evidence oral and documentary, I am not inclined to accept the contention of the workmen that they are entitled for pay protection for the period they have worked as work incharge workers with management ofBBMB prior to their apppointment with Haryana State ElectricityBoard and Punjab State Electricity Board . I have reached to the conclusion that the workmen are not entitled for the pay protection on the following grounds :-

(1) All the workmen were retenched from the capacity of work incharge workers by the management of BBMB as per the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, and all the workers voluntarily received the retrenchment compensation .

(2) The appointment letters , which are on record, shows that all the workers were appointed on the basis of their application they moved to the Haryana StateElectricity Board and Punjab State Electricity Board respectively. Their appointments were fresh appointments having no concern with their past services rendered with the management ofBBMB .

(3) There is no force in the contention ofthe workmen that other co-workers were given the pay protection , whereas , they were denied. As soon as the workmeh were retrenched as per the provisions of law and they received the retrenchment compensation , they were no more employees ofBBMB. As stated earlier , they were recruited freshly on their request . Thus , they form the different class for the purpose of Article 14 of the Constitution . It is a reasonable classification between the workmen who have not been retrenched and their services are regularized and the workmen who were retrenched by BBMB and they were freshly recruited on their application bythedifferent organizations . Accordingly, there is no violation of right of equality as claimed by the workmen.

(4) The appointment letters contained the terms and conditions proved that the appointment given to the workmen were fresh altogether . The workmen are bound to abide by the terms and conditions of [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

1937

AWARD

the appointment letters which they have accepted voluntarily.

Passed on 23-3-2009

Government of India vide notification No.L- 22012/ 66/F/95- IR(C- II ) , dated 21-9-1995 referred the following industrial dispute for Judicial adjudication to this Tribunal:---

Accordingly, the reference is disposed off with the direction that the workmen are not entitled for the pay protection for which they have raised the industrial dispute . Let the Central Government be informed and thereafter, file be consigned.

G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 26 मार्च , 2009

"Whether the action of the management of F.C.I to terminate the services of Shri Hakam Singh Sud Peon-cum-Chowkidar w.e.f. 31-10-93 is justified or not? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to?"

The only controversy between the workman and the management of Food Corporation of India is whether the workman has rendered his services directly under the controlofmanagement of FCI or his services were provided through a contractor M/ s . Associates Security and Services.

का.आ. 1030.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं एफ.सी.आई. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. , 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 81/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26-3-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-22012/66/एफ/1995- आईआर(सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

The position of law in this regard is very clear . To establish the relationship of employer and employee, the following conditions should be fulfilled:---

New Delhi , the 26th March , 2009

( 1 ) That the employee was directly appointed/ recruited/ engaged by the manmanagement of FCI .

(2) That the workman was paid the wages directly by the management of Food Corporation of India .

(3) That the workman was under the administrative control of the management of Food Corporation of India.

S.O. 1030.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 81/95) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court No. 1 Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of FCI and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on -26-3-2009 .

(4) The services of the workman were terminated/ disengaged by the management of Food Corporation of India.

[No. L-22012/66/F/ 1995 - IR (C- II)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

In this regard, I have gone through the evidence adduced/ filed by the parties oral and documentary which is available on record . I have heard learned counsels for both of the parties on their respective contentions .

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- I, CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D. 81/95

Shri Hakam Singh S/ o Shri Bachan Singh , C/o 1731 , Phase -7, Mohali - 160051 Distt . Ropar.

No appointment letter or evidence is available on record to show that workman was directly engaged/ appointed by the management of Food Corporation of India. In his cross- examination , it is denied by the workman that no appointment letter was issued to him . But he was enable to prove even prima facie by positive assertion that appointment letter by the Food Corporation of India was issued to him .

......Applicant

VERSUS

The Regional Manager , F.C.I. Punjab Region, Sec . 34, Chandigarh , SCO No. 359,

Respondent

APPEARANCES

Sri D. R. Sharma

For the Workman:

Sri N. K. Zakhmi

For the Management:

Thedocuments filed by the management proved that the wages were not directly paid by the Food Corporation of India, but the same were paid by M/ s Associates Security and Services to the workman and M/ s Associates Security and Services were paid by the management of Food Corporation of India for providing the services ofthe workman . The workman in his cross - examination recorded on 31-5-05 has admitted his signature on payment sheet mark A. Thus , the payment through M/ s . Associate 1938

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] Securities , a contractor , has been admitted by the workman.

transfer, he was disengaged by the contractor and not by Food Corporation of India .

Accordingly, no employee - employer relationship existed between the workman and the management of Food Corporation of India and workman is not entitled to any relief. The reference is accordingly answered. Central Governmentbe informed and , thereafter, filebe consigned .

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 31 मार्च , 2009

का.आ. 1031.-जबकि मैसर्स टी . एम. इंटरनेशनल लाजिस्टिक्स [कोड संख्या डब्ल्यू बी/40094 कोलकाता क्षेत्र में ] ( एतदुपरान्त प्रतिष्ठान के रूप में संदर्भित ) ने कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध अधिनियम , 1952 ( 1952 का 19 ) ( एतदुपरान्त अधिनियम के रूप में संदर्भित ) की धारा 17 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अंतर्गत छूट के लिए आवेदन दिया है ।

The management has also failed to prove that he was under the administrative control of the management ofFood Corporation of India . To prove these facts , the workman has produced the evidence of other employees of Food Corporation of India, they on their part have deposed before this Court that they have seen Shri Hakam Singh working with the Food Corporation of India. They have also deposed that Shri Hakam Singh was working with them in Food Corporation of India. No other facts were narrated by these witnesses in their evidence . When the services of any workman are provided through a contractor certainly the workman has to work with the other employees of the Food Corporation of India. It was the duty of the workman to prove the issue of administrative control of Food Corporation of India on him by some cogent evidence such as any disciplinary action taken by the management , sanction of leaves etc. Such type of evidence is not available on record.

2. और जबकि, केन्द्र सरकार के विचार में अंशदान दर के मामले में उक्त प्रतिष्ठान के भविष्य निधि के नियम उसके कर्मचारियों के लिए उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 में विनिर्दिष्ट नियमों की तुलना में कम हितकर नहीं है और कर्मचारी भी समान प्रकृति के किसी अन्य प्रतिष्ठान के कर्मचारियों के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम या कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि योजना , 1952 ( एतदुपरान्त योजना के रूप में संदर्भित ) के अंतर्गत अन्य भविष्य निधि लाभ भी प्राप्त कर रहे हैं ।

3. अतः केन्द्र सरकार एतद्‌द्वारा , अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 17 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए तथा इस संबंध में समय - समय पर विनिर्दिष्ट शर्तों को ध्यान में रखते हुए , उक्त प्रतिष्ठान को उक्त योजना के समस्त उपबंधों के प्रचालन से 30-03-2009 से अगली अधिसूचना तक के लिए छूट प्रदान करती है ।

[सं. एस-35015/39/2008- एस.एस. - 11 ]

एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 31st March , 2009

The workman has further summoned the attendance register of few employees from 1985 to 1988, and has asserted that his name is included in the attendance register . The management has rebutted it with the contentionthat this register was available to every workman at entry point of the Food Corporation of India and Sri Hakam Singh has misused by marking his presence in the register . It was further contended by the management that there are certain overlapping in writing in the name of Shri Hakam Singh which proved the fraud committed by the workman in this register . Without going to the controversy whether any fraud has been committed in marking the presence in this register by the workman , I am of the view that even if this register is considered to be genuine it cannot alone prove the contention of the workman that he has been directly working with the management, whereas , the management has proved that he was working through the contractor and was paid wages accordingly.

S.O. 1031. Whereas M/s T.M. International Logistics [under Code No. WB/40094 in Kolkata Region ] ( hereinafter referred to as the establishment) has applied for exemption under clause ( a) of sub - section ( 1 ) of section 17 of the Employees' Prevident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 ( 19 of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) .

Thus, on the basis of the above , I am of the view that services of the workman were provided to the Food Corporation of India by M/ s Associates Security and Services , a contractor and workman. was not directly appointed/ recruited/engaged by the management of Food Corporation of India. He was paid the wages through the contractor and was under the administrative control ofthe management. Certainly there was no occasion for the management of Food Corporation of India to retrenched the services of the workman .

2. And whereas in the opinion of the Central Government, the rules of the provident fund of the said establishment with respect to the rates of contribution are not less favourable to employees therein than those specified in section 6 of the said Act and the employees are also in enjoyment of other provident fund benefits provided under the said Act or under the Employees ' Provident Funds Scheme , 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Scheme) in relation to the employees in any other establishment ofsimilar character .

Moreover, the management has also filed certain documents relating to M/s Associate Securities which proved that the M/ s Associates Security artd Services transferred the services of the workman from Patiala to Chandigarh and on non - compliance of the order of [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3.Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in this regard from time to time, the Central Government , hereby, exempts the said establishment from the operation of all the provisions ofthe said Scheme with effect from 30-03-2009 until further notification.

[No. S- 35015/39/2008 - SS- II ] S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy . नई दिल्ली, 31 मार्च , 2009

का.आ. 1032.-जबकि मैसर्स ठाकुर वैद्यनाथ अय्यर एण्ड के. ( दिल्ली ( उत्तर ) क्षेत्र में कोड संख्या डी एल/2091 के अधीन} (एतदुपरान्त प्रतिष्ठान के रूप में संदर्भित ) ने कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध अधिनियम , 1952 ( 1952 का 19 ) ( एतदुपरान्त अधिनियम के रूप में संदर्भित ) की धारा 17 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अंतर्गत छूट के लिए आवेदन दिया है । 2. और जबकि, केन्द्र सरकार के विचार में अंशदान दर के मामले में उक्त प्रतिष्ठान के भविष्य निधि के नियम उसके कर्मचारियों के लिए उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 में विनिर्दिष्ट नियमों की तुलना में कम हितकर नहीं है और कर्मचारी भी समान प्रकृति के किसी अन्य प्रतिष्ठान के कर्मचारियों के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम या कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि योजना , 1952 ( एतदुपरान्त योजना के रूप में संदर्भित ) के अंतर्गत अन्य भविष्य निधि लाभ भी प्राप्त कर रहे हैं । 3. अतः केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा , अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 17 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए तथा इस संबंध में समय समय पर विनिर्दिष्ट शतों को ध्यान में रखते हुए, उक्त प्रतिष्ठान को उक्त योजना के समस्त उपबंधों के प्रचालन से 01-07-1971 से अगली अधिसूचना तक के लिए छूट प्रदान करती है ।

[सं. एस-35015/20/2009- एस.एस.- II ] ए. के. गुप्ता , अवर सचिव New Delhi, the 31st March , 2009

S.O. 1032. Whereas M/ s. Thakur Vaidyanath Aiyer & Col. [ under Code No. DL/2091 in Delhi (North) Region] (hereinafter referred to as the establishment) has applied for exemption under clause (a) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the Employees ' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 ( 19 of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) .

2. And whereas in the opinion of the Central Government, the rules of the provident fund of the said establishment with respect to the rates of contribution are not less favourable to employees therein than those specified in Section 6 of the said Act and the employees are also in enjoyment of other provident fund benefits provided under the said Act or under the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme , 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Scheme) in relation to the employees in any other establishment of similar character .

1939

भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 18 , 2009/चैत्र 28 , 1931

3.Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by clause ( a) of sub -section ( 1) of Section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in this regard from timeto time, the Central Government, hereby, exempts the said establishment from the operation of all the provisions ofthe said Scheme with effect from 01-07-1971 until further notification .

[No. S- 35015/20 /2009 - SS- II ] A.K. GUPTA , Under Secy . नई दिल्ली, 31 मार्च , 2009

का.आ. 1033.- जबकि मैसर्स गुजरात स्टेट फर्टिलाइजर्स एण्ड कैमिकल्स लि. [ बडोदरा क्षेत्र में कोड संख्या जी के 5238- बी के अधीन ] ( एतदुपरान्त प्रतिष्ठान के रूप में संदर्भित ) ने कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध अधिनियम , 1952 ( 1952 का 19 ) (एतदुपरान्त अधिनियम के रूप में संदर्भित ) की धारा 17 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अंतर्गत छूट के लिए आवेदन दिया है । 2. और जबकि , केन्द्र सरकार के विचार में अंशदान दर के मामले में उक्त प्रतिष्ठान के भविष्य निधि के नियम उसके कर्मचारियों के लिए उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 में विनिर्दिष्ट नियमों की तुलना में कम हितकर नहीं हैं और कर्मचारी भी समान प्रकृति के किसी अन्य प्रतिष्ठान के कर्मचारियों के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम या कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि योजना , 1952 ( एतदुपरान्त योजना के रूप में संदर्भित ) के अंतर्गत अन्य भविष्य निधि लाभ भी प्राप्त कर रहे हैं । 3. अतः केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा , अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 17 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए तथा इस संबंध में समय - समय पर विनिर्दिष्ट शर्तों को ध्यान में रखते हुए , उक्त प्रतिष्ठान को उक्त योजना के समस्त उपबंधों के प्रचालन से 1-06-1991 से अगली अधिसूचना तक के लिए छूट प्रदान करती है ।

[सं. एस-35015/24/2009- एस.एस. - 11 ] ए. के. गुप्ता, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 31st March, 2009

S.O. 1033. Whereas M/ s. Gujarat State Fertilizers &Chemicals Ltd. (under Code No. GJ/5238 -B in Vadodara Region) (hereinafter referred to as the establishment) has applied for exemption under clause (a) ofsub - section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the Employees ' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 ( 19 of 1952) ( hereinafter referred to as the Act) .

2. And whereas in the opinion of the Central Government, the rules of the provident fund of the said establishment with respect to the rates of contribution are not less favourable to employees therein than those specified in Section 6 of the said Act and the employees are also in enjoyment of other provident fund benefits provided under the said Act or under the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme , 1952 ( hereinafter referred to as the Scheme) in relation to the employees in any other establishment of similar character .

1940

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : APRIL 18 , 2009/CHAITRA 28 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]

समय- समय पर लिखित रूप में दिए गए निर्देशों से आबद्ध होंगे ।

[फाईल सं. 5/22/08-ईआई. एंड ईपी ]

किरण पुरी , निदेशक

MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY 3. Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub- section ( 1) of Section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in this regard from time to time, the Central Government, hereby, exempts the said establishment from the operation of all the provisions of the said Scheme with effect from 1-06-1991 until further notification .

(Department of Commerce)

[No. S-35015/24/2009-SS- II A. K. GUPTA, Under Secy.

New Delhi , the 16th April , 2009

वाणिज्य और उद्योग मंत्रलय

(वाणिज्य विभाग)

नई दिल्ली , 16 अप्रैल , 2009

S.O. 1034. In exercise ofthe powers conferredby sub-section( 1 ) of Section 7 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 (22of 1963 ) , read with sub- rule (2)ofrule 12 ofthe Export ( Quality Control and Inspection) Rules , 1964, the Central Government hereby recognises M/s. R. V. Briggs and Company Private Limited , Barbil , Keonjhar, Orissa- 758035 as an agency for a period ofthree years with effect from the date of publication of this notification, for inspection of minerals and ores (Group- 1 ), namely, IronOre and Manganese Ore excluding Mangaese dioxide, as specified in the Schedule to the notification of the Government of India in the erstwhile Ministry of Commerce published in the official gazette vide number S.O. 3975, datedthe 20th December , 1965, prior to the export of the said minerals and ores at Barbil , subject to the following conditions , namely: -

का.आ. 1034,-केन्द्रीय सरकार , निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम , 1964 के नियम 12 के उपनियम ( 2 ) के साथ पठित, निर्यात ( क्वालिटी नियंत्रण और निरीक्षण ) अधिनियम , 1963 ( 1963 का 22) की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स आर. वी. ब्रिग्स एंड कम्पनी प्राइवेट लिमिटेड , बारबिल , क्योंझार , उड़ीसा -758035 , को इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशन की उस तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए भारत सरकार के तत्कालीन वाणिज्य मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 3975 तारीख 20 दिसम्बर , 1965 द्वारा राजपत्र में प्रकाशित अधिसूचना की अनुसूची में यथाविनिर्दिष्ट खनिज और अयस्क (समूह-1 ) अर्थात लौह अयस्क और मैंगनीज अयस्कजिसमें मैंगनीज डाईआक्साईड वर्जित है , के निरीक्षण के लिए उक्त खनिज और अयस्कका निर्यात से पूर्व बारबिल में निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन एक अभिकरण के रूप में मान्यता प्रदान करती है , अर्थात:-

(i) that M/s . R.V. Briggs and Company Private Limited, Barbil shall give adequate facilities to the officers nominated by the Export Inspection Council in this behalf to examine the method of inspection followedby them in sending the report of inspection under rule 4 ofthe Export ofMinerals and Ores , Group - 1 ( Inspection) Rules , 1965; and

( i ) कि मैसर्स आर.वी. ब्रिग्स एंड कम्पनी प्राइवेट लिमिटेड बारबिल खनिज और अयस्क समूह- का निर्यात ( निरीक्षण ) नियम, 1965 के नियम 4 के अधीन निरीक्षण की रिपोर्ट देने के लिए उनके द्वारा अपनाई गई पद्धति की जांच करने के लिए इस संबंध में निर्यात निरीक्षण परिषद् द्वारा नामित अधिकारियों को पर्याप्त सुविधाएं देगी ; और

(ii) that M/ s . R.V. Briggs and Company Private Limited, Barbil in the performance of their function under this notification shall be bound by such directives as the Director( Inspection and Quality Control ) , Export Inspection Council may give in writing from time to time .

[F.No. 5/22/08- ΕΙ & ΕΡ ]

KIRAN PURI, Director ( ii ) कि मैसर्स आर.वी. ब्रिग्स एंड कम्पनी प्राइवेट लिमिटेड बारबिल इस अधिसूचना के अधीन अपने कृत्यों के पालन में निदेशक ( निरीक्षण और क्वालिटी नियंत्रण ) निर्यात निरीक्षण द्वारा

Printed by the Manager , Govt . of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 .