This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्रीसं० डी० एल० ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

REGD . NO . D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003-05 भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 24]

No.24]

नई दिल्ली, जून 7 जून13 , 2009 , शनिवार ज्येष्ठ 17 ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931 NEW DELHI, JUNE 7-JUNE 13, 2009, SATURDAY/ JYAISTHA 17- JYAISTHA 23, 1931

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके SeparatePaging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II खण्ड 3 PART II Section 3 उप-खण्ड (ii ) Sub- section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं StatutoryOrders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Otherthan the Ministry ofDefence)

विधि और न्याय मंत्रालय

(विधि कार्य विभाग )

नई दिल्ली , 6 जून 2009

का.आ. 1606.-राष्ट्रपति, श्री गुलाम ई. वाहनवती वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ता का दिनांक 6 जून , 2009 पूर्वाहन से भारत के महा -सॉलिसिटर के पद से त्यागपत्र स्वीकार करते हैं ।

[फा..सं. 18(2)/2004-न्यायिक] एम. ए. खान यूसुफ़ी, संयुक्त सचिव एवं विधि सलाहकार MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE (Department ofLegalAffairs) New Delhi , the 6th June, 2009

S.O. 1606. The President is pleased to accept the resignation ofShri Goolam E. Vahanvati, Senior Advocate as Solicitor General of India with effect from 06-06-2009 (FN).

[F. No. 18(2)/2004-Judl . ] M. A. KHAN YUSUFI, Jt . Secy. & Legal Adviser

(3215)

2061 GI/2009

विक मंत्रालय

(राजस्वविभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 27 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1607.-केन्द्रीय सरकार राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग नियम 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम 4 के अनुसरण में राजस्व विभाग के अधीन कष्ट्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क एवं सीमाशुल्क बोर्ड के निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को जिनके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है।

1. केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क आयुक्तालय , आई.पी. एस्टेट , नई दिल्ली-110011

2. केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क आयुक्तालय , एफ ब्लाक, ऋषि नगर, लुधियाना

[फा. सं. 11012/1 /2008 - हिन्दी-2 ] निदेशक (राजभाषा) 3216

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(DepartmentofRevenue)

NewDelhi, the 27th April, 2009

S.O. 1607. In pursuance of Sub Rule 4 ofRule 10 of the Official Language ( use of official purpose of the Union) Rules 1976 the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices under the Central Board of Excise & Custom, Department of Revenue , the 80% staffwhere of have acquired the working knowledge ofHindi ;

1. Office ofthe Commissioner ofCentral Excise, IPEstate, NewDelhi- 110011 .

2. Office of the Commissioner ofCentral Excise, F. Block, Rishi Nagar, Ludhiana.

[F. No. 11012/1 /2008-Hindi-2] i

MADHU SHARMA, Director (OL) (वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 5 जून , 2009

का.आ. 1608,- भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक अधिनियम, 1934 की धारा 8 की उपधारा ( 4 ) के साथ पठित , उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड (का) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्द्वारा , डा. के. सी. चक्रवर्ती, अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबन्ध निदेशक , पंजाब नैशनल बैंक , को, उनके कार्यभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अपले आदेशों तक , जो भी पहले हो , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक के उप- गवर्नर के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[पा. सं. 7/5/2008-बीओ. - 1 ] जी. बी. सिंह , उप सचिव (Department of Financial Services) NewDelhi, the 9th June , 2009

S.O. 1608.- In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub- section ( 1) read with sub - section (4) of Section 8 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 , the CentralGovernment, hereby appoints Dr. K. C. Chakraborty, Chairman & Managing Director , Punjab National Bank as DeputyGovernor , Reserve Bank of India for a period of three years from the date ofhis taking charge or until further orders,whichever is earlier.

[F. No. 7/5/2008 -BO. -I ]

G. B. SINGH, Dy. Secy.

स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय (स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 29 मई , 2009

का.आ. 1609.-भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 (1956का 102 ) की धास 11 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्: -

[PART II-SBC. 3 ( ii) ] उक्त प्रथम अनुसूची में शीर्षक " मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अईल" [ स्तम्भ ( 2) में ] के अंतर्गत " पश्चिम बंगाल स्वास्थ्य निशान विश्वविद्यालय , कोलकाता " और सर्पक " पंचीकरण के लिए संयोगन" [ स्तम्भ ( 3 ) में ] के अंतर्गत निम्नशिक्षित अभिष्टियां शामिल की जाएंगी

एम.बी.बी.एस.

आयुर्विज्ञान स्नातक और सत्य-विज्ञान (यह एक मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी यदि वह पश्चिम बंगाल स्वास्थ्य विज्ञांन विश्वविद्यालय , कोलकाता द्वारा स्नातकोतर चिकित्सा शिक्षा एवं अनुसंधान संस्थान , कोलकाता, पश्चिम बंगाल में प्रशिक्षण प्राप्त कर रहे छात्रों के संबंध में फरवरी , 2009 में अथवा उसके उपस्ता प्रक्षन की गई हो । ) [फा. सं. यू. 12012/86/2002 - एम.ई ( पी-11 ) ]

एन. बारिक , अवर सचिव- MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (Department ofHealth and Family Welfare) New Delhi , the 29th May, 2009

S.O. 1609.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) , the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely :-

In the said First Schedule against " West Bengal University ofHealth Sciences , Kolkata" under the heading 'RecognizedMedical Qualification' [ in column (2) ] and under the heading "Abbreviation for Registration" [ in column (3 ) ] , the following shall be inserted, namely :-- 2

M.B.B.S.

Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (this shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by West Bengal University ofHealth Sciences , Kolkata, West Bengal on or afterFebruary,2009 in respect of students being trained at Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education & Research, Kolkata, West Bengal) .

[F. No. U. 12012/86/2002 -ME( P- II) ]

N. BARIK, Under Secy.

3217

मायाका पत्रचून 13, 2009 23, 1931

[ পাল II- खण्ड 3( 1h) ]

नई दिल्ली, 29 मई, 2009

नईदिल्ली, 29 मई , 2009

मगर. 1611. केंद्रीय (1996 पर 102)की पारा 11 की उपधारा (2) काप्रयोग करते हुए, उमत अभिनयकी पाली अनुसूची में निम्मलिक्षित और संकोचन करती है

बार.आर. 1670.-पात्रत्ती आधिनियम , 1956 (1956 का 102 ) की मारा 11 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त राषिधनों का प्रथीन करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् से परामर्श करने के परचा उप अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में एतद्‌धारा निम्मलिखिय और संतोचन करती है , अर्थात्

उक्त प्रथम अनुसूची में शीर्षक " रिता महता [सा (2 ) में "[ साम्म (3) में] के निष्टनी , अर्थार

उमस पहली अनुसूची में " कालेज ऑफ कीमत एंड सर्जन, माध्ये , और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि में " कृष्णा इंस्टिट्यूट ऑफ मेडिकल साईकिल यूनिवर्सिटी, कराड, महाराष्ट्र" जोड़ा जाएगा सध्य 'मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सत अईता [ इसके आगे कॉलम (2 ) के रूपमें उरिलखित ] शीर्षक के अंतर्गत तथा " करण के लिए केषण " [इसके आगे कालम ( 3 ) के रूप में उल्लिखित ] शीर्षर्चत कृष्णा ऑफ मेडिकल सिटीसह, महाराष्ट्र" के सामने निम्नलिखित सम्मिलित किया जाएगा , अर्थ :-

(मेर एक मान्यतात्रा नि

स्नातक

संवेदनाहरन में डिप्लोमा

यदि वह कालीकट मिलना द्वारा अमाला आयुर्विधान सं केरल में प्रशिक्षण प्राप भार संबंध में नवम्बर, 2008 में उपरांत प्रदान की गई

स्थ्य में डिप्लोमा

[फा. नं. यू 12012/ 113/20 ई ( कौसा ) ]

डी. सी एच (बन गई, 2008 भो अथवा उसके बाद प्रश्न किया गया हो)

New Delhi , the 29th May, 2009

प्रसूति-विज्ञान एवं स्त्री रोग विज्ञाम में डिप्लोणा

डी.जी. गो. (आर मई , 2008 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान किया गया ↑)

विकलांग विद्या में डिप्लोमा

S.O. 1618 Incruitive of the powers conferredby sub-section (2) affidion Modical CouncilAnt: 1990 (002) of 1996), de Central Government, after оf india, heroby nukes the following funthiramondiments in the First Schedule to the saidAct, nenol

डी. ऑयों. ( अन अपपूबर, 1993 कोअथवा उसके बाद प्रदान किया गयाहो)

रेडियो- डाक्लोरिया में डिप्लोमा डी.एम.आर.डी. ( जब अप्रैल , 1994 कोअथवा उसके बाद प्रदान किया गया हो)

Inthe said FirstSchedule against "Calicut University, Calicut" under the heading 'Recognized Medical Qualification' [ in column (2) ] and under the heading "Abbreviation for Registration" [ in column ( 3 )] , the following shallbe inserted, namely:-

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (संवेदनाहरण विज्ञान)

एम.डी. ( संवेदनाहरण ) (जब मई, 2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान किया गया हो) M.B.B.S.

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (जनरल मेडिसिन)

Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery

एम.डी. (जनरल मेडिसिन ) (जब मई, 2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान किया गया हो)

एन.डी. ( सूक्ष्म जीव विज्ञान ) (जब मई, 2009 को अथवा उसके

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (सूक्ष्म जीव विज्ञान)

बाद प्रदान किया गया हो) (This shall be a moognized medical qualification when granted by Calicut University, Calicut on or after November , 2008 in respect ofstudents being trained at Ambala Institute of Medical Sciences , Thrissur, Kerala).

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन

ए.डी. ( आर.डी. ) (जब अप्रैल , [F. No. U. 12012/113/2002-ME(P - II)] (रेडियो डायग्नोस्टिक/रेडियोलॉजी ) 1994 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान किया गया हो) N. BARIK, UnderSecy.

3218

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

डाक्टर आफ मेडिसिन (समाजिक एवं निवारक मेडिसिन/सामुदायिक मेडिसिन

एम.डी. ( एस.पी.एम/सामुदायिक मेडि. ) (जब दिसम्बर , 1993 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान किया गया हो)

मास्टर आफ सर्जरी (शरीर रचना विज्ञान )

एम.एस. (शरीर रचना विज्ञान ) (जब मई, 2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान किया गया हो ) मास्टर आफ सर्जरी (प्रसूति विज्ञान एवं स्त्री रोग विज्ञान)

एम.एस. (प्रसूति विज्ञान एवं स्त्री रोग विज्ञान ) ( जब मई , 2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान किया गया हो)

मास्टर आफ सर्जरी (जनरल सर्जरी)

एम.एस. ( जनरल सर्जरी ) ( जब मई , 2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान किया गया हो ) मास्टर आफ सर्जरी (विकलांग विद्या)

एम.एस. (आर्थो ) (जब अक्तूबर , 1993 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान किया गया हो ) [फा. सं. यू. 12012/907/2008 - एम ई ( नीति- II ) ] एन. बारिक , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th May , 2009

S.O. 1611. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956), the Contral Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely :-

In the said First Schedule after " College of Physicians and Surgeons , Bombay" and entries relating thereto "Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences University, Karad, Maharashtra " shall be added and against " Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Karad, Maharashtra " under the heading ' Recognized Medical Qualification ' [hereinafter referred to as column (2) ] , and under the heading 'Abbreviation for Registration " [ hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ] , the following shall be inserted namely:-

Abbreviation for Registration RecognizedMedical Qualification

(2)

(3)

Diploma in Anesthesia D.A. (when granted on or after May2008)

Diploma in Child Health D.C.H. (when granted on or afterMay2008)

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] (2)

(3)

D.G.O. (when granted on or afterMay 2008)

Diploma in Obstetrics &Gynaecology

Diploma in Orthopaedics D.Ortho (when granted on or after October 1993)

Diploma in Radio- Diagnosis

D.M.R.D. (when granted on or afterApril 1994)

Doctor ofMedicine (Anaesthesiology)

M.D. (Anaesth) (when granted onor afterMay2009)

M.D. (Gen. Med . ) ( when granted on or after May2009)

Doctor ofMedicine (GeneralMedicine) Doctor ofMedicine (Microbiology)

M.D. (Mic. Bio.) (when granted onor afterMay2009)

M.D. (R.D. ) (when granted on orafterApril 1994)

Doctor ofMedicine (RadioDiagnosis/ Radiology)

M.D. (S.P.M./Comm. Med.) (when granted on or after Dec.1993)

Doctor ofMedicine (Social& Preventive Medicine/Community Medicine)

Master of Surgery (Anatomy)

M.S. (Anat.) (when granted on orafterMay2009)

M.S. (Obst . &Gynae) (when granted on or after May 2009)

Master of Surgery (Obstetrics& Gynaecology)

Master of Surgery (General Surgery) Master of Surgery (Orthopaedics)

M.S. (Gen. Surg.) (when granted on or after May 2009) M.S. (Ortho.) (when granted on or after Oct. 1993) [F. No. U. 12012/907/2008-ME(P- II )] N. BARIK, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 29 मई , 2009

का.आ. 1612. भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद्अधिनियम, 1956 (1956 का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उप- रा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:-

उक्त प्रथम अनुसूची में शीर्षक " मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता" [स्तम्भ ( 2 ) में ] के अंतर्गत " पश्चिम बंगाल स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , कोलकाता " और शीर्षक " पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण " [ स्तम्भ ( 3 ) में ] के अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां शामिल की जाएंगी अर्थात्:

एम.बी.बी.एस.

आयुर्विज्ञान स्नातक और शल्य-विज्ञान स्नातक

(यह एक मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी यदि यह पश्चिम बंगाल स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3219

भारत काराजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

कोलकाता द्वारा मिदनापुर मेडिकल कॉलेज , मिदनापुर , पश्चिम बंगाल में प्रशिक्षण प्राप्त कर रहे छात्रों के संबंध में फरवरी, 2009 में अथवा उसके उपरांत प्रदान की गई हो । [सं. यू. 12012/85 - ए/2002- एम ई ( पी- II ) ] एन. बारिक, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th May, 2009

S.O. 1612. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

In the said First Schedule against " West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata " under the heading "Recognized Medical Qualification" [ in column (2) ] and under the heading " Abbreviation for Registration" [ in column(3) ] , the following shall be inserted namely:-

(2)

(3)

M.B.B.S.

Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata, West Bengal on or after February, 2009 in respect of students being trained at Midnapore Medical College, Midnapore , WestBengal).

[No. U. 12012/85 -A/2002-ME(P -II)] N. BARIK, Under Secy.

नईदिल्ली, 29 मई , 2009

रूप में संदर्भित ] और ' संक्षेपण [ इसके आगे स्तंभ ( 4 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत , अंतिम प्रविष्टि और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित को रखा जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

(2)

(3)

(4)

एम एस ( सामान्य शल्य-विज्ञान)

शल्यक्रिया निष्णात बी पी के आई एच एस , (सामान्य शल्य- विज्ञान)

धारन , नेपाल (यह मान्यता प्राप्त अर्हता होगी यदि यह बी.पी. कोइराला स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान , धरन , नेपाल में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे छात्रों के लिए बी.पी. कोइराला स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान , धरन , नेपाल ( सम विश्वविद्यालय ) द्वारा 2002 को या इसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो) ।

[सं. वी . 11015/ 1 /2009-एम ई (पी-1 ) ] के. वी. एस. राव , उप सचिव New Delhi , the 29th May, 2009

S.O. 1613. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 12 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956), the Central Government , after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following further amendments in the Second Schedule to the said Act, namely :-

Inthe said Schedule under the heading "Nepal "- against "B.P. Koirala Institute ofHealth Sciences , Dharan, Nepal", under the headings " Title" ([ hereinafter referred to as column (2) ] , "Nature of qualifications as stated in diploma" [hereinafter referred to as column ( 3 ) ] and "Abbreviation" [hereinafter referred to as column (4) ] ; after the last entry and entry relating thereto the following shall be inserted, namely:-

(2)

(3)

(4)

"M.S.(General

Surgery)

कर.आर. 1613.-भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 (1956 का 102 ) की धारा 12 की उप- धारा (2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम की दूसरी अनुसूची में एत‌द्वारा निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्:-

उक्त अनुसूची में शीर्षक " नेपाल " के अंतर्गत, " बी.पी. कोइराला स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान संस्थान, धरन , नेपाल " के सामने विषयों के " शीर्षक" ( इसके आगे स्तंभ ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ) , " डिप्लोमा में उल्लिखित योग्यताओं का स्वरूप " [ इसके आगे स्तंभ ( 3 ) के

B.P.K.I.H.S.Dharan, Nepal

"Masters of Surgery(General Surgery)" (This shall be a recognized quali- ficationwhen granted by B.P. Koirala Instiitute of Health Sciences , Dharan , Nepal (Deemed University) in respect of students being trained atB. P. Koirala 3220

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

(4)

Institute of Health Sciences , Dharan , Nepal on or after 2002] .

[No. V. 11015/ 1 /2009-ME(P -I)] K.V.S. RAO , Dy. Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 28 मई , 2009

का.आ. 1614.-भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) ( क ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में डॉ. सुरेन्द्र कुमार सिन्हा को दिनांक 17-12-2002 से भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् के एक सदस्य के रूप में निर्वाचित किया गया था जो बिहार राज्य सरकार के निर्वाचन क्षेत्र का प्रतिनिधित्व करते हैं ।

जबकि भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् ने सूचित किया है कि डॉ. सुरेन्द्र कुमार सिन्हा जो भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 की धारा 3 ( 1 ) ( ग ) के उपबंध के अधीन बिहार राज्य सरकार के निर्वाचन क्षेत्र का प्रतिनिधित्व कर रहे हैं , ने अपनी अनुपस्थिति के बारे में कोई मौखिक/लिखित सूचना दिए बगैर दिनांक 16-11-2007 , 15-3-2008 और 13-11-2008 को आयोजित परिषद् की लगातार 3 सामान्य निकाय बैठकों में भाग नहीं लिया था । अतः बिहार राज्य सरकार के निर्वाचन क्षेत्र का प्रतिनिधित्व करने वाले डॉ. सुरेन्द्र कुमार सिन्हा, की भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् की सदस्यता समाप्त हो गई है ।

इसलिए , अब , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उप - धारा (3) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में बिहार राज्य के निर्वाचन क्षेत्र का प्रतिनिधित्व करने वाले डॉक्टर सुरेन्द्र कुमार सिन्हा की बिहार राज्य सरकार की भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् की सदस्यता को इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से समाप्त हुआ समझा जाएगा ।

[सं. वी-11013/6/2009-एमई ( नीति-1 ) ]

के. वी. एस. राव , उप सचिव New Delhi , the 28th May, 2009

S.O. 1614.- Whereas in pursuance of the provision of sub - section ( 1 ) ( a) of section 3 of the Indian Medical Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) Dr. Surendra Kumar Sinha was nominated as a member of the Medical Council of India in consultation with the State Government of Bihar with effect from 17-12-2002 .

Whereas the Medical Council of India has informed that Dr. Surendra Kumar Sinha who is representing Government of Bihar under Section 3 ( 1 ) (a) of IMC Act , 1956 had not participated in three consecutive General Body Meetings ofthe Council held on 16-11-2007, 15-3-2008 and 13-11-2008 without any verbal/written communication regarding his absence . Therefore , Dr. Surendra Kumar Sinha has ceased to be a member of Medical Council of India representing Government of Bihar.

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)] Now, therefore, in pursuance of the provision of sub-section (3) of Section 7 of the said Act, Dr. Surendra Kumar Sinha shall be deemed to have ceased to be a member ofthe Medical Council of India representing Government ofBihar with effect from the date of issue ofthis notification .

[No. V- 11013/6/2009-ME(Policy-I ) ] K.V S.RAO, Dy. Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 28 मई , 2009

का.आ. 1615.-भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) ( क) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में प्रो. एस. सी. महायात्रा को दिनांक 2-9-2004 से भारतीय आयुविज्ञान परिषद् के एक सदस्य के रूप में निर्वाचित किया गया था जो सांबलपुर विश्वविद्यालय के निर्वाचन क्षेत्र का प्रतिनिधित्व करते हैं ।

जबकि भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् ने सूचित किया है कि प्रो. एस.सी. महापात्रा जो भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद अधिनियम, 1956 की धारा 3 ( 1 ) ( ग ) के उपबंध के अधीन सांबलपुर विश्वविद्यालय के निर्वाचन क्षेत्र का प्रतिनिधित्व कर रहे हैं , ने अपनी अनुपस्थिति के बारे में कोई मौखिक/लिखित सूचना दिए बगैर दिनांक 10-3-2007 , 16-11-2007 और 15-3-2008 को आयोजित परिषद् की लगातार 3 सामान्य निकाय बैठकों में भाग नहीं लिया था। अतः सांबलपुर विश्वविद्यालय के निर्वाचन क्षेत्र का प्रतिनिधित्व करने वाले प्रो . एस. सी. महापात्रा , की भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् की सदस्यता समाप्त हो गई है ।

इसलिए , अब , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उप - धारा (3) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में सांबलपुर विश्वविद्यालय के निर्वाचन क्षेत्र का प्रतिनिधित्व करने वाले प्रो. एस.सी. महापात्रा की भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् की सदस्यता को इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से समाप्त हुआ समझा जाएगा ।

[सं. वी-11013/4/2009- एमई ( नीति-1 ) ]

के. वी. एस. राव, उप सचिव New Dethi , the 28th May, 2009

S.O. 1615. Whereas in pursuance of the provision of sub-section ( 1) (a) of section 3 of the Indian Medical Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) Prof. S.C. Mohapatra was nominated as a member of the Medical Council of India representing Sambalpur University with effect from 2-9-2004.

Whereas the Medical Council of India has informed that Prof. S.C. Mohapatra who is representing Sambalpur University under Section 3 ( 1 )( a) of IMC Act, 1956had not participated in three consecutive General Body Meetings ofthe Council held on 10-3-2007 , 16-11-2007 and 15-3-2008 without any verbal /written communication regarding his absence . Therefore , Prof. S. C. Mohapatra has ceased to be a member of Medical Council of India representing Sambalpur University .

Now, therefore, in pursuance of the provision of [भाग II-ाण्ड 3(ii)]

3221

भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

sub-section (3) of Section 7 of the said Act, Prof. S.C. Mohapatra shallbe deemed to have ceased to be a mesiber of the Medical Council of India representing Sambalpur University with effect from the date of issue ofthis notification.

[No. V-11013/4/2009-ME(P-I)] K. V. S. RAO, Dy. Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 28 मई , 2009

का.आ. 1616.-भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) ती धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) ( ग ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में डॉ. राजभेडार रेड्डी थंडूक को दिनांक 6-10-2004 से भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् के एक सदस्य के रूप में निर्वाचित किया गया था जो आन्ध्र प्रदेश के आर.एम.जी. निर्वाचन क्षेत्र का प्रतिनिधित्व करते हैं ।

जबकि भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् ने सूचित किया है कि डॉ. राजशेखर रेड्डी थंडूरू जो भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 की धारा 3 ( 1 ) ( ग ) के उपबंध के अधीन आन्ध्र प्रदेश के आर.एम.जी. निर्वाचन क्षेत्र का प्रतिनिधित्व कर रहे हैं , ने अपनी अनुपस्थिति के बारे में कोई मौखिक लिखित सूचना दिए बगैर दिनांक 10-3-2007 , 16-11-2007 और 15-3-2008 को आयोजित परिषद् की लगातार 3 सामान्य निकाय बैठकों में भान नहींलिया था। अतः आन्ध्र प्रदेश के आर.एम.जी. निर्वाचन क्षेत्र का प्रतिनिधित्व करने वाले डॉ. राजशेखर रेड्डी थंबूरू , की भास्तीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् की सदस्यता समाप्त ही गई है ।

इसलिए, अब , उक्त अधिनियन की भास 7 की उप- भारा ( 3 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में आन्ध्र प्रदेश के आर.एम.जी. निर्वाचन क्षेत्र का प्रतिनिधित्व करने वाले डॉ. रामशेखर रेड्डी बंदूक की भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् की सदस्यता को इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तारीख से समाप्त हुआ समझना मारा ।

[सं. वी-11013/5/2009-एमई (नीति-1) ]

के. वी. एस. राव , उप सचिव New Delhi, the 28th May, 2009

S.O. 1616.-Whereas in pursuance of the provision ofsub-section ( 1 ) (c) of Section 3 ofthe Indian Medical Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956) Dr. Rajasekhara Reddy Thanduru was elected as a member of the Medical Council of India representing RMG Constituency of Andhra Pradesh with effect from 6-10-2004.

Whereas the Medical Council of India has informed that Dr. Rajasekhara Reddy Thanduru who is representing RMG Constituency ofAndhra Pradesh under Section 3 (1 )( c) of IMC Act, 1956 had not participated in three consecutive General Body Meetings of the Council held on 10-3-2007, 16-11-2007 and 15-3-2008 without any verbal/written communication regarding his 'absence. Therefore , Dr. Rajasekhara Reddy Thanduru has ceased to be amember of Medical Council ofIndia representing RMG Constituency of Andhra Pradesh .

Now, therefore , in pursuance of the provision of sub-section(3) ofSection 7 ofthe said Act, Dr. Rajasekhara Reddy Thanduru shall be deemed to have ceased to be a member ofthe Medical Council of India representing RMG Constituency ofAndhra Pradesh with effect from thedate ofissue ofthis notification.

[No. V.-11013/5/2009-ME(P -I)] K.V.S. RAO, Dy. Secy.

विदेश मंत्रालय (सीपीवी प्रभाग)

नई दिल्ली , 27 मई , 2009

का.आ. 1617.-राजनयिक और कॉसलीय ऑफिसर (शपथ औरफीस) के अधिनियम , 1948 की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा श्री नवल प्रभाकर तप्लियाल उच्च श्रेणि लिपिक को 27-5-2009 से भारत के राजदूतावास , खातून ( सुडान) में सहायक कॉसुलर अधिकारी के कर्तव्यों का पालन करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[सं. टी 4330/1/2006 ] आर. के. पेरिनडिया , अवर सचिव (कोंसुलर ) MINISRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(CPVDivision) New Delhi , the 27th May, 2009

S.O. 1617.-In pursuance of the clause (a) ofthe Section 2ofthe Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948, the Central Government hereby authorize Shri Naval Prabhakar Thapliyal , UDC to perform theduties ofAssistant Consular Officer in the Embassy of India, Khartoum with effect from 17thMay, 2009.

[No. T. 4330/1/2006] R. K. PERINDIA , Under Secy. (Consular) नई दिल्ली, 27 मई , 2009

का.आ. 1618.-राजनयिक और कोंसलीय ऑफिसर (शपथ और फीस ) के अधिनियम , 1948 की धारा 2 के खण्ड (क) के अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्द्वारा श्री आर. बी. लाल , सहायक को 27-5-2009 से भारत के प्रधान कोंसलावास ह्यूस्तन ( यूएसए) में सहायक कोंसुलर अधिकारी के कर्तव्यों का पालन करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[सं. टी 4330/1/2006] आर. के. पेरिनडिया , अवर सचिव (कोंसुलर ) New Delhi , the 27th May, 2009

S.O. 1618. In pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees ) Act, 1948, the Central Government hereby authorize Shri R. B. Lal , Assistant to perform the duties of Assistant Consular Officer in the Consulate General of India, Houston U.S.A. with effect from 27th May, 2009.

[No. T. 4330/1/2006] R. K. PERINDIA, Under Secy.( Consular) 3222

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23. 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्तामामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 20 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1619. केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की रुप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स पायनियर स्केल इंडस्ट्रीज , 89 , धुलेश्वर गार्डन , सी- स्कीम , जयपुर -302001 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " WINW- 6" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " WINTEX " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09 / 09/ 41 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 10 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 सीलिंग प्रावधान

स्केल की निचली प्लेट और उपरी कवर मे किए गए छेद के माध्यम से सीलिंग की जा सकती है और तब सीलिंग तार को इन दो छेदों में से निकाला जाता है । स्टाम्पिंग के लिए लीड सील के साथ स्केल की बाडी से तार निकालकर स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट से जोड़ा जाता है । उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 200 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * . 2 × 10 *, 5× 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 20 ) /2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 3223

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13, 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department ofConsumerAffairs)

New Delhi , the 20th April , 2009

S.O. 1619. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of Series " WINW-6 " and with brand name "WINTEX" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Pionear Scale Industries , 89 Dhuleshwar Garden , C-Scheme , Jaipur- 302 001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/41 ;

The saidmodel is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 60 tonnes and minimum capacity of 200kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 10kg. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply .

Fig. 2 Sealing arrangement

The sealing is done through the hole , made in the bottom plate and top cover of the scale , and then sealing wire is passed through these two holes . Stamping plate is connected through sealing wire passing from the body of scale with the lead seal , to get the stamping .

The instrument has external access to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-section (12) ofSection 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make . accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonnes and upto 200 tonnes with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10¹ ,where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (20)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director ofLegal Metrology 2061 GI/09-2 3224

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 20 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1620.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मागक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त 'मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा:

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एक्यूरेट वेइंग सिस्टम , 67 , सिकदर स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता -110004 (पश्चिम बंगाल ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता (यथार्थता वर्ग ) वाले " ए डब्ल्यूपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एक्यूरेट" है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह आई एन डी/09/09/ 51 सममुदेशित किया गया है , अमुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन दुषित है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वील्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों को रोकने के लिए स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट पर सर्किट की सुरक्षा और मैकेनिकल असेम्बली के लिए लीड सील लगाई जाती है। उपकरण की बाडी पर दिए गए छेदों के जरिए लीड और सील तार लगाकर सीलिंग की जा सकती है । सील से छेड़‌छाड़ किए बिना उपकरण को खोला महीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मडिल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी साथग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिमणि किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 3.के उससे अधिक के " ई " मौन के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 5000 कि. ग्रा. बैंक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 *, 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 01 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान भारत का राजपत्र : खूब 13 , 2009/ोष्ठ 23, 1931

NewDelhi , the 20th April, 2009

S.O. 1620-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with provisions ofthe Standards of WeightsVeights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weigh (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods ofsustaine render accurato service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) ofSection 36 ofthe said at the Content Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Platiem type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class- III) of Series "AWP andwith brand ROUND ACCURATE Curminator referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M /s. Accurate Weighing Systems, 67, Aus Brent, Koithatm- 110004 (WB ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/51;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type ) with a manimiam onpanity of 200 kg and minimum capacity of 400g. The verification scale interval (e) is 20g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent adtinative retainedtare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) indicates the weighing results. The instrument opeesteson 230Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure-2 Sealing provision ofthe indicator ofmodel

Lead seal is affixed on the stamping plate which is attached in the back side of the indicator for the security of cirovit.and mechanical assembly to avoid fraudulent use. Sealing can be done by applying lead and seal wire through the holes provided on the body of the instrument. The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematis diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external access to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to extemal calibration.

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub- section ( 12) ofSection 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government horoby declares that this certificate ofapproval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make, accuracy and performance.of samo serios with maximum capacity above 50kg upto 5 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of600 to 10,000 for 'e ' value of5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10%, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactu ed:

[F. No. WM- 21 (01 )/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 3226

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009 / JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नईदिल्ली, 20 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1621.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एक्यूरेट वेइंग सिस्टम्स, 67 , सिकदर स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता-700 004 ( पश्चिम बंगाल ) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " ए डब्ल्यू टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एक्यूरेट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/52 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार को रोकने के लिए स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट पर सर्किट की सुरक्षा और मैकेनिकल असेम्बली के लिए लीड सील लगाई जाती है। उपकरण की बाडी पर दिए गए छेदों के जरिए लीड और सील तार लगाकर सीलिंग की जा सकती है । सील से छेड़‌छाड़ किए बिना उपकरण को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्ग्र. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एम ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 01 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3227

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 20th April, 2009

S.O. 1621. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication ofHigh accuracy (Accuracy class- III ) of Series " AWT " and with brand name "ACCURATE " (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufacturedby M/s . Accurate Weighing Systems , 67 , Sikdar Street, Kolkata- 700 004 (WB) which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/52;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100 g. The verification scale interval (e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model .

Lead seal is affixed on the stamping plate which is attached in the back side of the indicator for the security of circuit and mechanical assembly to avoid fraudulent use . Sealing can be done by applying lead and seal wire through the holes provided on the body of the instrument . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external access to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board todisable access to external calibration..

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub- section (12) ofSection 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance ofsame series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of100to50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of100mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (01)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director ofLegal Metrology 3228

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 20 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1622.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बार और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्तः मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा (7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ओसाव इंडस्ट्रियल प्रोडेक्टस प्रा. लि. अमर बिल्डिंग , रेलवे क्रोसिंग के पास , एनएच -22 , चंबाघाट , जिला- सोलन , हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग, रेफ X( 1 ) वाले " IND/AFFSM " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण के माडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " INDOSAW" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/609 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 ग्रा . है । मापमान अंतराल " डी" 0.1 ग्रा. है। इसकी भरण क्षमता की रेंज 100 ग्रा. से 500 ग्रा. तक है और स्पीड रेंज 4 से 6 पैकस प्रति मिनट है। उपकरण में एक फिलिंग प्वाइंट है। मशीन को उर्वरक , बैग या कंटेनर में चीनी , ड्रम्स में आयल या कैमिकल आदि जैसे फ्री फ्लोइंग सालिड मैट्रियल को फिलिंग करने के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम प्रदर्शित करता है। उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विधुत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण की सिलिंग के लिए दो सीलें लगाई जाती हैं , एक आंशिक रूप से स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट पर लगाई जाती है और दूसरी सील इंडीकेटर के कवर पर पतले तार पर लगाई जाती है । सील तोडे बिना इंडीकेटर और स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 247)/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3229

भारत का राजपत्र : खून 13, 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

3 ( ii) ]

NewDelhi, the 20th April, 2009

80.1622. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of theStandards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accarate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the saidAct, the CentralGovernment hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval ofthe Model of Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument belongingto AccuracyClass, X( 1 ) of ' IND/AFFSM' series with brand " INDOSAW" ( hereinafter referredto as the said model), manufactured by M/s . OSAW Industrial Products Pvt . Ltd. , Amar Building, Near Railway Crossing, NH-22, Chanbaghat, Distt . Solan (HP) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/609;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument. Its maximum capacity is 500g . and minimum capacity is 2 g. The value of scale interval is ' d' 0.1g. Its filling capacity range 100g . to 500g . and speed rage is 4 to 6 packs per minute . The instrument has one filling point . The machine is designed for filling the free flowing solid material like fertilizer or sugar in the bag or container and for filling ofoil or chemicals in drums etc. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-2 Sealing diagram of the sealing provision of the model.

Two seals are used for sedling the instrument, one seal is fixed partially on the stamping plate, and the another seal isapplied on the the thin wire fixed to cover the indicator . The indicator and the stamping plate can not be opened without breaking the seal . A typical schematic diagram ofsealing provision of the model is given above.

Further , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-section (12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Govemment hereby declares that this certificate ofapproval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with capacity rage from 1g . to 5kg . manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (247)/2008]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director ofLegal Metrology 3230

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 20 अप्रैल, 2009

का.आ. 1623.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सोहिल इंटरप्राइज , बी -70/ 59 , डीएसआईडीसी कम्पलैक्स, लारेंस रोड इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया , दिल्ली 110035 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " WOCP- 3 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक कॉयन आपरेटिड व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " WOODS " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/356 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गंज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक कॉयन आपरेटिड व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

A5161

आकृति-2 सीलिंग प्रसवधान

स्केल की निचली प्लेट और ऊपर के कवर में किए गए छेदों के जरिए सीलिंग की जाती है और तब इन दोनों छेदों में से सीलिंग तार निकाली जाती है । स्टाम्पिंग के लिए स्केल की बाडी से निकलती हुई सीलिंग तार के जरिए स्टापिंग प्लेट को लीड सील से जोड़ा जाता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 100 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 200 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 * , 5× 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 269 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3231 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13, 2009 /ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

New Delhi , the 20th April , 2009

S.O. 1623. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Coin Operated Person Weighing Machine ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of Series " WOCP - 3 " and with brand name " WOODS " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Sohil Enterprises , B -70/59 , D.S.I.D.C. Complex, Lowrence Road Industrial Area, Delhi - 110035 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /08/356;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic CoinOperated Person Weighing Machine) with a maximum capacity of 200kg and minimum capacity of 2 kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

A5161 Figure-2 Sealing diagram of the sealing provision of the model

Sealing can be dsone by making holes in the studs welded inside the top cover of the indicator of the instruments , then a seat wire is passed through these studs and a lead seal is applied . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 100 kg to 200 kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1x 10k , 2x10 or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured. 2

[F. No. WM- 21 (269)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director ofLegal Metrology 2061 Gl/09-3 3232

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23. 1931

[PART 11 -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 20 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1624.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माए मानक अधिनियम 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेत्रा प्रदान करता रहेगा:

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सोहिल इंटरप्राइज , बी-70/ 59 , डीएसआईडीसी कम्पलैक्स, लारेंस रोड इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया दिल्ली 110035 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " WOWB-4 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित नोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " WOODS " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08 /357 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेत्रिय प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोन्नन्न परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 सीलिंग प्रावधान

और केन्द्रीय सरकार तक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक वे " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक्र और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2× 10 * , 5.10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 269 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3233 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009 /ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

New Delhi , the 20th April , 2009

S.O. 1624. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge Type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class- III) of Series " WOWB-4 " and with brand name "WOODS " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Sohil Enterprises , B-70/59, D.S.I.D.C. Complex, Lowrence Road Industrial Area, Delhi - 110035 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/357;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge Type) with amaximum capacity of30 tonne and minimum capacity of 100 kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 5 kg. It has a tare devicewith a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure-2 Sealing provision of the indicator ofthe model

The sealing is done through the hole , made in the bottom plate and top cover of the scale, and then sealing wire is passed through these two hole . Stamping plate is connected through sealing wire passing from the body of scale with the lead seal, to get the stamping . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, inexercise ofthe power conferred by sub-section (12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate ofapproval of the said model shall also cover the weighing istruments of similar make, accuracyandperformance ofsame series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 100 tonne with verification scale interval (n) inthe range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is apositive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer i i accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been n anufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 (269 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , I irector of Legal Metrology 3234

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009 /JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 20 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1625.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सोहिल इंटरप्राइज , बी -70/59 , डीएसआईडीसी कम्पलैक्स , लारेंस रोड इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया , दिल्ली-110035 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " WOJ -3 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " WOODS " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 08 / 358 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 10 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

WOODS

आकृति-2 सीलिंग प्रावधान

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 के, 5× 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 269 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 3235 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

New Delhi , the 20th April , 2009

S.O. 1625. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) of Series " WOJ - 3 " and with brand name "WOODS" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Sohil Enterprises , B -70/59 , D.S.I.D.C. Complex, Lowrence Road, Industrial Area, Delhi- 110035 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/ 358 .

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with a maximum capacity of300g and minimum capacity of200 mg . The verification scale interval (e) is 10mg. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

WOODS

Figure- 2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model

The sealing is done through the hole, made in the bottom plate and top cover of the scale , and then sealing wire is passed through these two hole . Stamping plate is connected through sealing wire passing from the body of scale with the lead seal , to get the stamping. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub-section ( 12) ofSection 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50 mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (269)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 3236

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JUNE 13. 2009 / JYAISTHA 1931

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii))

नई दिल्ली, 20 अप्रैल, 2009

का.आ. 1626. केन्द्रीय सरक उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परि का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम 1976 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक उपबंधों क अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल तियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा:

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त "धिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप धारा द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स विश्वकर्मा स्केल्ज प्रा. लि. , 166 , नेहरू नगर, पास्ट बाक्स 31 , रुड़की, जिला हरिद्वार उत्तराखण्ड) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " LWB " श्रृंख के एनालॉग सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण बेब्रिज स्टील यार्ड टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " विश्वकर्मा " है ( जिपे इसमें इसकः पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है। और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 09 / 51 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एनालॉग सूचन सहित नेकेनिकल लीवर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज- स्टील यार्ड टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता : 00 कि.ग्रा. है और मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग यथार्थता वर्ग III ) से संबंधित है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 कि. ग्रा. है ।

आकृति-2( वेब्रिज)

मशीन को सील करने के अतिरिक्त स्टीलयार्ड के एक छोर पर लीड सील लगाई गई है जा स्टीलयार्ड की फोटो में दिखाई गई है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 कि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2-10 * 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

| फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 286 ) / 2008 ]

आर माधुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3237 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत काराजपत्र : जून 13, 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

New Delhi , the 20th April , 2009

S.O. 1626.--Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes certificate of approval of model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge- Steelyard type) with analogue indication (hereinafter referred to as the said model) belonging to medium accuracy class (Accuracy class - III ) and " LWB " series with brand name " VISHWAKARMA " , manufactured by M /s . Vishwakarma Sclaes Private Limited , 166 Nehru Nagar , Post Box- 31 , Roorkee, Distt . Haridwar ( Uttrakhand) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/51 ;

The said model is a mechanical lever based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge -Steelyard type ) with analogue indication of maximum capacity 50 tonne , minimum capacity 100 kg. and belonging to medium accuracy class (accuracy class - III ) . The value of verification scale interval ( e) is 5kg .

चलेखलों साल

PESTRES LTD HS -537 FLOOR KALLISH COLORY

मजवटी

Figure-3 Sealing arrangement

In addition to sealing the machine lead seal is affixed on the steelyard at one end which is visible in the photograph ofthe steelyard.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 100 tonne and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5kg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10k or 5× 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (286)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 3238

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009 / JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[ PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ))

नई दिल्ली , 20 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1627.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स विश्वकर्मा स्केल्ज प्रा. लि. , 166 , नेहरू नगर , पोस्ट बाक्स 31 , रूड़की , जिला हरिद्वार ( उत्तराखण्ड ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " डीईडब्ल्यू बी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( स्टेटिक इलेक्ट्रोनिक रोड वेब्रिज ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " विश्वकर्मा " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/52 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

आकृति-2 सीलिंग प्रावधान

कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों को रोकने के लिए स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट पर लीड सील लगाई जाती है। जो सर्किट को सुरक्षा और मैकेनिकल असेम्बली के लिए इंडिकेटर के पिछली तरफ से जुड़ा हुआ है । उपकरण की बाडी पर दिए गए छेदों के जरिए लीड और सील तार लगाकर सीलिंग की जाती है । उपकरण को सील के छेड़‌छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से और 200 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 *, 5× 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 286 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3239 भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13, 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi, the 20th April , 2009

S.O. 1627. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Static Electronic Road Weighbridge) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of Series "DEWB" and with brand name " WISHWAKARMA " (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s . Vishwakarma Scales Private Limited, 166 Nehru Nagar Post Box-31 , Roorkee , Distt Haridwar ( Uttrakhand) and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/09/52 ;

Thesaid model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of60 tonne and minimum capacity of200kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 10kg. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply .

Lead seal is affixed on the stamping plate which is attached in the back side of the indicator for the security.of circuit and mechanical assembly to avoid fraudulent use . Sealing can be done by applying lead and seal wire through the holes provided on the body of the instrument. The instrument cannot be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic- diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall'also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 200 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of5g . or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10 , 2x10 or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (286)/2008 )

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director ofLegal Metrology 2061G1/09-4 3240

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 13 , 2009 /JYAISTHA 23 , 193 !

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 20 अप्रैल, 2009

का.आ. 1628.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ,

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स नोवा व्हे इंडिया लि. , एल -13 , डा. वी एस आई एस्टेट, फेज- II , ( नियर एसआरपी टूल्स ) थिउवनमलूर , चेन्नै-600041 द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग- X ( 1 ) के " डीएफएस - एल " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित ग्रविमेट्रीक फिलिंग इंस्ट्रूमेंट ( ड्रम फिलिंग इंस्ट्रूमेंट ) जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " PRECIAMOLEN " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/165 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित ग्रविमेट्रीक फिलिंग इंस्ट्रूमेंट ( ड्रम फिलिंग उपकरण ) है । इसकी रेंज 10 कि.ग्रा. से 100 कि.ग्रा. या इसके बराबर की मात्रा सहित 10 भराव प्रति मिनट की (अधिकतम ) बारम्बारता सहित नोजल द्वास है , जो उत्पाद की प्रकृति और भराव को आकार पर निर्भर करता है । इसका एयर प्रैसर 5 Kg/ cm2 है । मशीन को मुक्त प्रवाह के साथ विस्कास या नॉन-विस्कास के उत्पाद जैसे, तेल , जूस , कीटनाशक , पेंट, चिचिपे रसायन आदि भरने के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । वैक्यूम फ्लोरेंस डायोड (वीएफडी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

व्हेट कंट्रोल के विकर्गतः विपरीत कोणों पर पिछली प्लेट काट कर , दो छेद किए गए हैं और स्टाम्प और सील सत्यापन के लिए इन दो छेदों को लीड तार से बांधा जाता है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ३/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भीदिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमीर्दन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उनी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 10 कि.ग्रा. से 100 मि.ग्रा. तक की रेंज में हैं ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 61 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3241 [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13, 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

New Delhi , the 20thApril,2009

S.O. 1628.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to if by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights andMeasures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument (Drum Filling Instrument ) belonging to Accuracy Class, X( 1 ) of ' DFS- L' series with brand " PRECIAMOLEN" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s Nova Weigh India Ltd. , L- 13 , Dr. V.S.I. Estate , Phase II , Olear St.PoTools ) Thiruvanakyur, Chennai - 600041 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/165;

Theanic model is a strain gauge type load coll based Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument (Drum Fil'ing Instrument) , känsthe range from 10k.g. to 100 Kg. or ofequivalent volume with a frequency of weighing 10 till per minute Gdax,Mingushathe nozzle depending upon size of fill and nature ofthe product. Its air pressure is 5Kg/cm². The Machine is designed for filling the free flowing, viscous and non-viscous products like oil , juices , pesticides, paints, chemical adiprivegretto The vacuum Flourescent Diode (VFD) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operateson 230 Volts, Splintaallamative current power supply

Figure-2: Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Two holes are made on the rear plate at diagonally opposite corners of the weight controller which are fastened by using a leaded wire through these holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tempering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub-section (12) ofSection 36 ofthe sai 1 Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate ofapproval of the said model shall also cover the weighiną; instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance ofsame series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 10 kg to 100 kg or equivalent volume manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufact ired.

[F. No. WM-21 (61 )/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 3242

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009 / JYAISTHA 23. 1931

नई दिल्ली , 20 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1629.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स नोवा व्हे इंडिया लि. , एल -13 , डा. वी एस आई एस्टेट , फेज- II , ( नियर एसआरपी टूल्स ) थिउवनमलूर , चेन्नै-600041 द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग रेफ- X ( x ) जहां X ≤ 1 वाले " सी डब्ल्यू एस एम " श्रृंखला के आटोमेटिक कैच वेइंग इंस्ट्रूमेंट ( चैक व्हीयर ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " PRECIAMOLEN " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09 / 167 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित कैच वेइंग इंस्ट्रूमेंट ( चैक व्हीयर ) है । इसकी रेंज 5 कि.ग्रा. से 60 कि.ग्रा. या इसके बराबर की मात्रा सहित 60 पैक्स प्रति मिनट की ( अधिकतम ) बारम्बारता सहित जो पैकेज की लम्बाई , यथार्थता वर्ग और पैकेज ज्योमेटरी पर नर्भर करती है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 25 कि.ग्रा. है और मापमान वर्गीकरण ( स्केल डिविजन ) 10 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एलसीडी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्टस , 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

व्हेट कंट्रोल के विकर्णतः विपरीत कोणों पर पिछली प्लेट काट कर , दो छेद किए गए हैं और स्टाम्प और सील के सत्यापन के लिए इन दो छेदों को लीड तार से बांधा जाता है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 के , 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 61 )/ 2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 3243

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13, 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

NewDelhi , the 20th April , 2009

S.O. 1629.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the CentralGovernment hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Automatic Catch Weighing Instrument (Check Weigher) belonging to accuracy class , Ref, X(x) , where ≤1 of ' CWS - M' series with brand name "PRECIAMOLEN " (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Nova Weigh India Ltd. , L- 13 , Dr. V.S.I. Estate , Phase II , (Near S.R.P. Tools), Thiuvanmlyur , Chennai -600041 and which is assigned the approvalmark IND/09/09/ 167;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based Automatic Catch Weighing Instrument (Check Weigher ). It has the range from 5 k.g. to 60 Kg . or of equivalent volume with a maximum frequency of 60 packs per minute (max . ) depending upon the package length , accuracy class and package geometry. It has maximum capacity 25 Kg. and scale interval ' d' is 10 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent substractive retained tare effect . The liquid crystal diode (LCD) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-2: Sealing diagram of sealing provision of the Model

Two holes are made on the rear plate at diagonally opposite corners of the weight controller which are fastened by using a leaded wire through these holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal. The indicator can not be opened without tempering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub-section ( 12 ) ofSection 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate ofapproval ofthe said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10000 for ' e ' value of5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10kor 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negativewhole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (61 )/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of LegalMetrology 3244

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/JYAISTHA 23. 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली , 20 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1630.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स नोवा व्हे इंडिया लि. , एल -13 , डा. वी एस आई एस्टेट , फेज- II , ( नियर एस आर पी टूल्स ) थिउवनमलूर , चेन्नै-600041 द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग- X ( 1 ) के " डीएफएस - एच " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रीक फिलिंग इंस्ट्रूमेंट ( ड्रम फिलिंग इंस्ट्रूमेंट ) जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " PRECIAMOLEN " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/ 166 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रीक फिलिंग इंस्ट्रूमेंट ( ड्रम फिलिंग उपकरण ) है । इसकी रेंज 100 कि.ग्रा. से 500 कि.ग्रा . या इसके बराबर की मात्रा सहित 5 भराव प्रति मिनट की अधिकतम ) बारम्बारता सहित नोजल द्वारा है , जो उत्पाद की प्रकृति और भराव के आकार पर निर्भर करती है । इसका एयर प्रैशर 5 Kg/cm² है । मशीन को मुक्त प्रवाह के साथ विस्कास या नॉन-विस्कास के उत्पाद जैसे तेल, जूस , कीटनाशक, पेंट , चिपचिपे रसायन आदि भरने के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । वैक्यूम फ्लोरेंस डायोड ( वीएफडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उप्रदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

वेट कंट्रोल के विकर्णतः विपरीत कोणों पर पिछली प्लेट काट कर , दो छेद किए गए है और स्टाम्प और सील सत्यापन के लिए इन दो छेदों को लीड तार से बांधा जाता है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (61 )/2009]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3245 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009 /ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi, the 20th April , 2009

S.O. 1630. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the CentralGovernment hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument (Drum Filling Instrument ) belonging to Accuracy Class , X( 1 ) of ' DFS - H ' series with brand "PRECIAMOLEN " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s Nova Weigh India Ltd. , L- 13 , Dr. V.S.I. Estate, Phase II , (Near S.R.P. Tools ), Thiuvanmlyur, Chennai -600041 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/ 166;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument (Drum Filling Instrument). It has the range from 100 kg . to 500 kg . or of equivalent volume with a frequency of weighing 5 fill per minute (Max.) through the nozzle depending upon size of fill and nature of the product. Its air pressure is 5kg/ cm² . The Machine is designed for filling the free flowing, viscous and non -viscous products like oil , juices, pesticides , paints, chemical adhesives , etc. The vacuum Flourescent Diode (VFD ) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure- 2: Schematic diagram of the sealing provision of the model

Two holes are made on the rear plate at diagonally opposite corners ofthe weight controller which are fastened by using a leaded wire through these holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tempering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe Model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

[F. No. WM -21 (61 )/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 3246

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23. 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 20 अप्रैल, 2009

का.आ. 1631. केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करन के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( ४ ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स राज वेइंग सिस्टम , के-326 , मुखिया मार्केट , सरदार पटेल रोड , करावल नगर, दिल्ली -94 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " एसटी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " SQUARE " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/09/25 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल सी डी) प्रदर्श तालन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

오

ROUARE

आकृति-2 मॉडल की सीलिंग का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

सर्किट और मैकेनिकल असेंबली की सुरक्षा और कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों से रोकने के लिए इंडीकेटर के दायीं तरफ लगी स्टांपिंग प्लेट पर लीड सील को लगाया जाता है । उपकरण की बाडी पर दिए गए छेदों के माध्यम से लीड और सील तार लगाकर सीलिंग की जा सकती है । उपकरण कोसील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2× 10 के, 5× 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 11 )/2009 ] आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3247 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 20th April , 2009

S.O. 1631. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) of Series " S T" and with brand name " SQUARE" (hereinafter referred to as the said model), manufactured by M/s . Raj Weighing Systems , K- 326, Mukhiya Market , Sardar Patel Road, Karawal Nagar, Delhi -94 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/25;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Tabletop type ) with a maximum capacity of 30Kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply.

Figure-2Schematic diagram ofsealing provision of the model .

Lead seal is affixed on the stamping plate which is attached in the right side of the indicator for the securityof circuit and mechanical assembly to avoid fraudulent use . Sealing can be done by applying lead & seal wire through the holes provided on the body of the instrument . The instrument cannot be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external access to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of5,000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100 mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (11 )/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director ofLegal Metrology.

2061 G1/09-5 3248

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JUNE 13 , 2009 / JYAISTHA 23, 1931

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

ई दिल्ली , 20 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1632.--केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर किरन के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम 1976 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स राज वेइंग सिस्टम, के-326 , मुखिया मार्केट, सरदार पटेल रोड, करावल नगर , दिल्ली दाग विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एसपीटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " SQUARE " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन आई एन डी/09/ 09/26 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त भॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

सर्किटऔर मैकेनिकल असेंबली की सुरक्षा और कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों से रोकने के लिए इंडीकेटर के दायीं तरफ लगी स्टांपिंग प्लेट पर लीड सील को लगाया जाता है । उपकरण की बाडी पर दिए गए छेदों के माध्यम से लीड और सील तार लगाकर सीलिंग की जा सकती है । उपकरण को सील के छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेश्न के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच का रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और के न्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 50 कि.ग्रा. से 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 ×10 * , 2 × 10 *, 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 11 ) /2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3249 भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 20th April , 2009

S.O. 1632. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Plateform type) with digital indication ofmedium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of Series "SPT " and with brand name " SQUARE" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s . Raj Weighing Systems , K- 326, Mukhiya Market, Sardar Patel Road, Karawal Nagar, Delhi - 94 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/26;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Plateform type ) with a maximum capacity of200 Kg and minimum capacity of400g. The verification scale interval (e) is 20g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LCD ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230V , 50Hz alternative current power supply .

Figure-2Schematic diagram of sealing provision of model

Lead seal is affixed on the stamping plate which is attached in the right , Back side ofthe indicator for the security ofcircuit amd mechanical asembly to avoid fraudulent use . Sealing can be done by applying lead & seal wire through the holes provided on the body of the instrument . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board. to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub-section (12) ofSection 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighin; instruments of similarmake , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg up to 1000 Kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10kor 5 × 10%, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufact ired.

[F. No. WiM-21 (11 )/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM Director of Legal Metrology 3250

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/JYAISTHA 23. 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 20 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1633. केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेराक एशिया एसडीएन बीएचडी, नं. 21 , जालानपेंडिडिक यू1/31 हीकाम जलेंमेरी इंडस्ट्रियल पार्क , 40150 शाह आलम सेलेनगोर्दारूल इहसान, मलेशिया द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग- X ( 1 ) के ' आर 12/1080 ' श्रृंखला के स्वचालित ग्रविमेट्रीक फिलिंग इंस्ट्रूमेंट, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " SERAC " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स एशियन पेंटस लि. प्लाट ई 6 - एफ 13 , सिप्कोट इंडस्ट्रीयल पार्क , श्रीपेरूमबुदर , जिला कांचीपुरम ( तमिलनाडु ) द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/09/62 समनुदेशित किया गया है . अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है । उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित ग्रविमेट्रीक फिलिंग इंस्ट्रूमेंट है । इसकी रेंज 10 कि.ग्रा. तक 90 फिल प्रति मिनट की अधिकतम बारम्बारता सहित है , जो उत्पाद की प्रकृति और मात्रा पर निर्भर करती है । इसका एयर प्रैसर 6.Kg/cm² है । मशीन को मुक्त प्रवाह के साथ पानी आधारित पेंट को कंटेनरों में भरने के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-3 उपकरण के मॉडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान

इंडीकेटर के विकर्णतः प्रतिमुख कोनों से पिछले कवर को काटकर छेद किए गए हैं और सील एवं स्टाम्प के सत्यापन के लिए इन छेदों को लीड तार से बांधा गया है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना इंडीकेटर को खोला नहीं जा सकता ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी। दिया गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 26 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

3251

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13, 2009 /ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

New Delhi , the 20th April , 2009

S.O. 1633. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument belonging to Accuracy Class, X( 1 ) of ' R12/ 1080 ' series with brand "SERAC" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured byM/s . Serac Asia SDN Bhd, No. 21 , Jalanpendidik U1 /31 , Hicom Glenmarie Industrial Park,40150 Shah Alam Selengordarul Ehsan, Malaysia and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/s Asian Paints Ltd. , Plot E6 - F13 , Sipcot Industrial Park, Sriperumbudur , Distt. Kancheepuram, (Tamilnadu) and which is assigned theapproval mark IND/09/09/62;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument. It has the range upto 10 Kg. with maximum frequency of 90 fill per minute depending upon the quantity and nature ofthe product . Its air pressure is 6Kg/cm2 . The Machine is designed for filling the free flowing water based paints in containers . The Liquid Crystal Diode Display (LCD) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 3 : Sealing diagram ofthe sealing provision of the model

From the diagonally opposite corners of the indicator , holes are made by cutting the rear cover and fastened by using a leaded wire through these holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tempering the seal.

The instrument has external access to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

[F. No. WM-21 (26)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 3252

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009 /JYAISTHA 23.1931

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 20 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1634.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सेराक एशिया एसडीएन बीएचडी, नं. 21 , जालानपेंडिडिक यू1 / 31 , हीकाम जलेंमेरी इंडस्ट्रियल पार्क, 40150 शाह आलम सेलेनगोर्दारूल इहसान , मलेशिया द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग- X( 1 ) के ' आर 12/1620 ' श्रृंखला के स्वचालित ग्रविमेट्रीक फिलिंग इंस्ट्रूमेंट जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " SERAC " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स एशियन पेंटस लि. प्लाट ई 6 - एफ 13 , सिप्कोट इंडस्ट्रीयल पार्क , श्रीपेरूमबुदूर, जिला कांचीपुरम ( तमिलनाडु ) द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 09/6 ! समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित ग्रविमेट्रीक फिलिंग इंस्ट्रूमेंट है । इसकी रेंज 10 कि.ग्रा. से 35 कि.ग्रा. तक 40 फिल प्रति मिनट की अधिकतम बारम्बारता सहित है , जो उत्पाद की प्रकृति और मात्रा पर निर्भर करती है । इसका एयर प्रैशर 6 Kg/cm2 है । मशीन को मुक्त प्रवाह के साथ पानी आधारित पेंट को कंटेनरों में भरने के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एलसीडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-3 उपकरण के माडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान ।

इंडीकेटर के विकर्णतः प्रतिमुख कोनों से पिछले कवर को काटकर छेद किए गए हैं और सील एवं स्टाम्प के सत्यापन के लिए इन छेदों को लीड तार से बांधा गया है । सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना इंडीकेटर को खोला नहीं जा सकता ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (26 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3253

भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 20th April, 2009

S.O. 1634. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval ofthe model of Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument belonging to Accuracy Class , X( 1 ) of ' R12/ 1620 ' series with brand " SERAC" (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s . Serac Asia SDN Bhd, No. 21 , Jalanpendidik U1 /31 , Hicom Glenmarie Industrial Park, 40150 ShahAlam Selengordarul Ehsan , Malaysia and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/s . Asian Paints Ltd. , Plot E6- F13 , Sipeot Industrial Park, Srirumbudur , Dist. Kancheepuram , (Tamilnadu) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/61;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based Automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument. It has the range upto 10 Kg . to 35 kg . with maximum frequency of40 fill per minute depending upon the quantity and nature of the product . Its air pressure is 6Kg/cm2 . The Machine is designed for filling the free flowing water based paints in containers . The Liquid Crystal Diode Display (LCD) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply

Figure-3: Schematic diagram of the sealing provision of the model

Fromthe diagonally opposite corners ofthe indicator , holes are made by cutting the rear cover and fastened by using a leaded wire through these holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tempering the seal.

The instrument has external access to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board todisable access to external calibration . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

[F. No. WM-21 (26)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 3254

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 20 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1635.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ओहॉस कोरपोरेशन, # 19 ए, चेपीन रोड , पी.ओ. बाक्स 2033 , पिन ब्रुक , NJ07058-2033,. यू एस ए द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता (यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " PA- II" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूत्चन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " OHAUS " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) जिसे भारत में बिक्री से पहले या बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के मैसर्स ओहॉस वेइंग इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स , साकी विहार रोड , पोवई , मुंबई -400072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08 /576 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलेक्ट्रो मेगनेटिक फोर्स कम्प्रेशन सिद्धांत पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 4100 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 5 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 100 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

CHAUS

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

निचली प्लेट और साइड प्लेट में दो छेद करके , सीलिंग की जाती है और इन छेदों में से मुड़ी सीलिंग तार निकाली जाती है और तब लीड से सील की जाती है । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो १ मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 1,00,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 1,00,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2× 10 * , 5× 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

1 फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 226)/2008 ]

आर. माधुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3255 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 20th April , 2009

S.O. 1635. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) of Series " PA - II " and with brand name " OHAUS " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Ohaus Corporation , # 19A , Chapin Road, P.O. Box 2033 , Pine Brook, NJ07058-2033 , USA and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/s. Ohaus Weighing India Pvt . Ltd. , Amar Hill, Saki Vihar Road, Powai , Mumbai -400 072 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/576;

The saidmodel is an Electro Magnetic Force Compensation Principle based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 4100g and minimum capacity of 5g. The verification scale interval (e) is 100mg. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Crystal Diode (LCD) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230V , 50Hz alternative current power supply.

DHAUS

Plender

Figure -2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model .

The sealing is done by making two holes , one in bottom plate and other in the side plate and a twisted sealing wire is passed from these holes and then sealed by the lead. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub- section (12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 1,00,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 5,000 to 1,00,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the samematerials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (226 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director ofLegal Metrology 7

2061 G1/09-6 3256

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23. 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 20 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1636.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अर्धािनःम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा:

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 16 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ओहॉस कॉरपोरेशन, # 19 ए, चेपीन रोड, पी.ओ. बाक्स 2033 , पिन ब्रुक , NJ07058-2033 . यू एस ए द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग - 1 ) वाले " PA- I " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " OHAUS " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मण्डल कहा गया है ) जिसे भारत में बिक्री से पहले या बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के मैसर्स ओहॉस वेइंग इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स , साकी विहार रोड , पोवई , मुंबई-400072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/577 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करता है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलेक्ट्रो मैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्प्रेशन सिद्धांत पर आधारित अस्वचालित तालन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 210 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 मि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन भापमान अंतराल ( ई ) । मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एता सी हो प्रदशं तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम:

निचली प्लेट और साइड प्लेट में दो छेद करके , सीलिंग की जाती है और इन छेदों में से भुड़ी सीलिंग तार निकाली जाती है और तब लीड से सील की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपराका दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित और 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 के , 5× 10 कं , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 226 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3257 भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009 /ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 20th April , 2009

S.O. 1636. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy class - 1 ) of Series " PA - I " and with brand name " OHAUS" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Ohaus Corporation , # 19A, Chapin Road, P.O. Box 2033 , Pine Brook, NJ07058-2033 , USA and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/ s . Ohaus Weighing India Pvt . Ltd. , Amar Hill , Saki Vihar Road, Powai , Mumbai -400 072 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/577;

The said Model is an Electro Magnetic Force Compensation Principle based non- automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 210g and minimum capacity of 100mg . The verification scale interval (e) is 1mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Crystal Diode ( LCD) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V , 50Hz alternative current power supply.

Figure-2: Schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe Model .

The sealing is done by making two holes , one in bottom plate and other in the side plate and a twisted sealingwire is passed from these holes and then sealed by the lead. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range 50,000 or above for ' e ' value of 1mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negativewhole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (226)/2008 ]

R. MA THURBOOTHAM , Director ofLegal Metrology 3258

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009 / JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली , 20 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1637.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मैटलर टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स , साकी विहार रोड , पोवई, मुंबई-400072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एलए " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार- डुअल रेंज ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेटलर टोलेडो " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/ 336 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार- डुअल रेंज ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1500 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 600 कि. ग्रा. तक 100 ग्रा. और 600 कि.ग्रा. से 1500 कि.ग्रा. तक 200 ग्रा. है । उपकरण में कुछ अतिरिक्त कार्य हैं जैसे मैनुअल कंट्रोल फंक्शन , प्री- पैकिंग , इंर्वेटरी फंक्शन , बल्क सेल्ज़, सेल्फ सर्विसिंग , सेल्ज रिस्पिट , लेबल , सेल्फ- लेबलिंग और प्रिंटिंग सुविधा आदि । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 सीलिंग प्रावधान

सीलिंग को तोल पैन पर किया जाता है , जहां दो होल स्क्रू हैं जिसके माध्यम से सत्यापन सील और स्टाम्प प्राप्त करने के लिए लीड तार को बांधा जाता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 * , 5× 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यके समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 258 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3259

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 20th April, 2009

S.O. 1637. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Platform type -dual range ) with digital indication of "LA " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " METTLER TOLEDO " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s .Mettler Toledo India Pvt . Ltd. , Amar Hills , Saki Vihar Road , Powai , Mumbai -400 072. Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/336;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Platform type - dual range) with a maximum capacity of 1500 k.g. and minimum capacity of 2 kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 100g. up to 600 kg . and 200g above 600 kg . and up to 1500 kg . The instrument has the following additional function like manual control function , pre -packing , inventory function , bulk sales , self- servicing, sales reciept, label , self- labeling and printing facility. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The liquid crystal diode (LCD) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

210

Figure -2: Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

The sealing is done on the weigh pan . where there are two holed screws , through which a leaded wire is fastened for receiving the verification seal and stamp. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further , in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg . to 5000 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (258 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 3260

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 20 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1638.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर त्रिचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स टोकेहैम कैयजन प्राइवेट लि. , ए 313/174 , टी टी सी इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, एम आई डी सी, माहेप, नवी मुंबई द्वारा अंकक सूचन सहित " स्प्रिट " श्रृंखला के इलेक्ट्रोनिक डिस्पैंसिंग पम्प के माडल का , जिसके ब्राडं का नाम " स्प्रिट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/60 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल इलेक्ट्रोनिक केलिब्रेशन और इलेक्ट्रोमैकनीकल टोटलाइजर सहित इलेक्ट्रोनिक डिस्पेंसर/डिस्पेंसिंग पम्प जिसमें सिंगल होज से छः नोजल तक प्राप्त हैं , पाजिटिव डिस्प्लेसमेंट मीटर के सिद्धांत पर कार्य करता है । इसका अधिकतम प्रवाह दर 80 लीटर प्रति मिनट और न्यूनतम प्रवाह दर अधिकतम का 10 % है । इसमें " मूल्य " सूचन के लिए 7 अंको ( 00000.00 ) की आकृति, " वाल्यूम " के लिए 7 अंक (00000.00), " यूनिट प्राइस " के लिए 5 अंक ( 000.00 ) और इलेक्ट्रोमेकेनिकल टोटलाइजर के लिए 7 अंक जमा । दशमलव है । उपकरण के सूचन संकेत लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) पर प्रदर्शित होते हैं । उपकरण 220 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । इलेक्ट्रोनिक्स या तो सीधा पावर के साथ या वैकल्पिक बैटरी के माध्यम से कार्य करता है । पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के वितरण के लिए मूल्य और मात्रा के लिए माडल में प्री - सेट की सुविधा है ।

आकृति-2 सीलिंग प्रावधान

मीटर असम्बेली के हेड स्क्रू और सीलिंग बोल्ट के छेदों में से सील वायर निकाल कर पम्प की सीलिंग की जाती है । तब मीटर को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए लीड सील लगाई जाती है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररुपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

। 'फा. सं . डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 22 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3261 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

New Delhi , the 20th April , 2009

S.O. 1638. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report is in conformity with the provision of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by the third provision to sub- section (3 ) and sub -sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby approves issues and publishes the certificate of approval ofthe model of Electronic Dispensing Pump with digital indication (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), of series ' Spirit ' with brand name " SPIRIT" , manufactured by M/s . Tokheim Kaizen Pvt . Ltd. , A313 / 174, TTC Industrial Area, MIDC , Mahape , Navi Mumbai , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09 /09/60;

The said model is an electronic dispenser/dispensing pump available from single hose to six nozzles working on the principle of positive displacement meter with electronic calibration and electromechanical totalizer . It has a maximum flow rate upto 80 lpm and a minimum flow rate of 10% of maximum . Display maximum configuration is 7 digits (00000.00 ) for "Price" indication, 7 digits (00000.00) for " Volume " indication , 5 digits (000.00) for " Unit Price" and 7 digits plus 1 decimal for electromechanical totalizer . The indications of the instrument are displayed on the Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD) display type . It operates on 220V, 50 Hertz A/C power supply. The Electronics would be either powered direct or alternatively through battery. Model also has the pre- set facility for volume & price of the petroleum products to be dispensed .

Finure-I : Model

Figure-2: Sealing arrangerment Metering unit

For sealing the pump seal wire is passed through the holes of head screw of meter assembly and then through the sealing bolt . Then lead seal is applied to prevent the opening of the meter.

The instrument has external access to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card mother board to disable access to external calibration . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

[F. No. WM-21 (22)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 3262

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 13 , 2009 / JYAISTHA 23.1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 20 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1639.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इंटरफेस स्केल्स प्रा. लि. , ए-87/5 , वजीरपुर इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , दिल्ली-110052 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " आई एफ डब्ल्यू बी "श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इंटरफेस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08 /608 समनुदेशितं किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज टाइप ) है। इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है। उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है।

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट पर सीलिंग प्वाइंट लगाया गया है जो तोलन सूचक के दाईं तरफ और बाईं तरफ से जुड़ा हुआ है और इंडिकेटर के कवर एवं बेस को तोलन सूचक के बीच के चारों कोनों पर हेड होल स्क्रू के उपयोग द्वारा जोड़ा गया है। इस हैड होल स्क्रू को विशेष गुणवत्ता वाली तार से जोड़ा गया है और उसके बाद तार दोनों सिरों को लीड सील के साथ जोड़ा गया है । तोलन इंडीकेटर के कवर को लीड सील तोड़े बिना खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यर्थाथता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 150 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * , 5× 10 *, के है , जो घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 234 )/2008 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3263 भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 20th April, 2009

S.O. 1639. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge Type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " IFWB " and with brand name " INTERFACE" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s . Interface Scales Pvt . Ltd. , A- 87/5, Wazirpur Industrial Area, Delhi- 110052 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08 /608 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge Type ) with a maximum capacity of 50 tonne and minimum capacity of 100kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 5kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-2: Sealing provision of the indicator of the model

Sealing point is affixed on the stamping plate which is attached in the right hand side or left hand side of the weighing indicator and cover and base of the indicator are connected by using head hole screws at four corner of the base ofthe weighing indicator . These head hole screws are connected with special quality of wire , thereafter the both ends ofthe wire are joined along with lead seal . Cover of the weighing indicator can not be opened without breaking the lead seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act . The Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 150 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (234)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 2061 G1/09-7 3264

THE GAZETTE OF INJA JUNE 13 , 2009 / JYAISTHA

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

नईदिल्ली 20 अप्रैल, 2004

का.आ. 1640.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपार्ट उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधी के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि 22% का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक और बाजार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में । करলা বেলা।

अतः, अग्ब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिभित्र ८ को उपधारा और द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता टाप - इलेक्ट्रोनिक एनालिटिकल बलैंस ) हुए मैसर्स इशिदा इंडिया प्रा. लि. , 191 - ग्राउंड का फेज ( यथार्थता वर्ग -1 ) वाले " एन वाई " श्रृंखला के अकक सूचन प्रहित , अस्वचालित डोल के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " " ISHIDA जिस मर्म इसके पश्चात् नक्त पॉडर ४५ है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/ 155 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलेक्ट्रो मेगनेटिक फोर्स कम्प्रेशन सिद्धात पर आधारित अउपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 220 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 मि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन प्रथातिल ( है । मि.ग्रा.नार्थयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विक्रमाडो हो।उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत पर कार्यमा हरी ता

0.0000

आकृतिक

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए इंडिलंम्र के पिछली तक कर और बैंकन स्क्रूमें कस कर बांध दिया जाता है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ लिए बिना नहीं खो एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है । हुए लोडिड सील वायर को दो छेद माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है।नाहरी केलिये तक पहुंच की एक कलाइ ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्त्रिच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शतितया का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धात डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उम्मी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्प्र. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50.000 अधिक के रेंज में सत्यापन भापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10,650 के है. जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 69 )/2009 ]

आर माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3265 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

New Delhi , the 20th April , 2009

S.O. 1640.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed. authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measurés (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type -Electronic Analytical Balance ) with digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy class - I ) of series "NY" and with brand name " ISHIDA " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Ishida India Pvt. Ltd. , 191 -Ground Floor , Udyog Vihar , Phase - IV, Gurgoan , Haryana- 122 016 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/155 .

The said model is an electo magnetic force compensation principle based non -automatic weighing instrument with amaximum capacity of 220g. and minimum capacity of 100 mg. The verification scale interval (e) is 1mg, It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The liquid crystal diode ( LCD) desplay indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V. 50Hz alternative current power supply . The instrument has external weight calibration facility.

00000

Figure- 2: Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

On the rear side of the indicator , a leaded sealing wire is fastened through two bored screws , passing over the cover and bracket , for reciving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . Atypical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of50,000 or above for ' e ' value of Img. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 69 )/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 3266

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 21 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1641.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह संमाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इशिदा इंडिया प्रा. लि. , 191 - ग्राउंड फ्लोर , उद्योग विहार फेज- IV , गुडगांव -122016 ( हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- I ) वाले " डी एक्स " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाईप- इलेक्ट्रोनिक एनालिटिकल बैलेंस ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ISHIDA " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/ 156 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलेक्ट्रो मेगनेटिक फोर्स कम्प्रेशन सिद्धांत पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 220 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 मि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 1 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है। उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विधुत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । उपकरण में बाहरी तोलन केलिब्रेशन सुविधा है ।

00000 आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए इंडिकेटर के पिछली तरफ कवर और ब्रैकेट में से निकालते हुए लीडिड सील वायर को दो छेद स्क्रूमें कस कर बांध दिया जाता है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता। मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यर्थाथता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50.000 या अधिक के रेंज में सत्यापन भापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10%, 210 or 5/10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 69 )/2009 ] आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 3267

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13, 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 21st April , 2009

S.O. 1641. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type -Electronic Analytical Balance) with digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy class - 1 ) of series " DX" and with brand name " ISHIDA " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Ishida India Pvt . Ltd. , 191 -Ground Floor , Udyog Vihar , Phase - IV , Gurgoan -Haryana- 122 016 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/156;

The said model is working on mono - metal tuning fork sensor principle based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 220g . and minimum capacity of 100mg. The verification scale interval (e) is 1mg . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The liquid crystal diode (LCD) display indicates the weighing reuslt . The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply. The instrument has external weight calibration facility.

00000 Figure-2: Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

On the rear side of the indicator , a leaded sealing wire is fastened through two bored screws , passing over the cover and bracket, for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . Atypical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub- section (12) ofSection 36 of the said Act , The Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg. with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of50,000 or above for ' e ' value of 1 mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 (69 )/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 3268

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JUNE 13 , 2009 /JYAIS THA 121931

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली. 21 अप्रैल , 2009

का.अ. 1642 केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहिन प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति दखें। चाट और माप मानक अधिनियम 1977 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 16 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( ४ ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इशिदा इंडिया प्रा. लि. , 191- ग्राउंड फ्लोर नद्यांग विहार फेज- IV, गुडगांव 122016 हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता (यर्थाथता वर्ग- Ii ) वाले " आई टी पी- III " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वाचालित तान्नन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ISHIDA " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 09/ 164 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 20 ग्रा. है । उसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक थारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है वैज्ञ्यूम क्लोरसेंट डायोड ( वी एफ हो। प्रदर्श तालान परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल का सिलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए इंडिकेटर के पिछली तरफ कवर और ब्रैकेट में से निकालते हुए लीडिड सील वायर को दो छेद स्क्रूमें कस कर बांध दिया जाता है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है। बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकन के लिए एडी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियो का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण-पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्वांत . डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यर्थाथता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 * 5/10 , के हैं जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 69 )/2009 ]

आर. माधुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3269

भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 21st April , 2009

S.O. 1642. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication ofmedium accuracy (Accuracy class- III ) of series " ITP - III " and with brand name " ISHIDA" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s . Ishida India Pvt . Ltd. , 191 - Ground Floor, Udyog Vihar, Phase- IV, Gurgoan- Haryana- 122 016 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/ 164;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 150kg. and minimum capacity of400g . The verification scale interval (e) is 20g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Vacuum Fluorescent Diode (VFD) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

000

Figure- 2: Sealing provision ofthe indicator ofmodel

On the rear side of the indicator, a leaded sealing wire is fastened through two bored screws, passing over the cover and bracket, for reciving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . Atypical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , The Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance ofsame series with maximum capacity above 50kg. and up to 5000kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' c ' value of. 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (69 )/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 3270

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 13 , 2009 / JYAISTHA 23. 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 21 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1643,- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ; बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम. 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इशिदा इंडिया प्रा. लि. , 191-ग्राउंड फ्लोर, उद्योग विहार फेज- IV, गुडगांव -122 016 ( हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग-1 ) वाले " यू बी- I " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप - प्रिसिजॅन बलैंस ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ISHIDA " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/ 157 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मांडल मोनो- मेटल ट्यूनिंग फोर्क सेंसर सिद्धांत पर आधारित कार्य करने वाला अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 220 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 मि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) । मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । उपकरण में बाहरी तोलन केलिब्रेशन सुविधा है ।

0/1

Set

Punetien

आकृति 2 मॉडल को सिलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए इंडिकेटर के पिछे बायीं तरफ नट और बोल्ट में दो छेद बनाकर लीड वायर से बांधा जाता है। उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता। मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्वांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यर्थाथता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 या अधिक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 210 5 × 10 %, के हैं, जो घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (69 )/2009] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3271 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 21st April, 2009

S.O. 1643. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type - Precision Balance) with digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy.class - I ) of series "UB- I" and with brand name " ISHIDA " (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s . Ishida India Pvt . Ltd. , 191-Ground Floor , Udyog Vihar , Phase IV, Gurgoan- Haryana- 122 016 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 09/ 157;

The said model is working on mono -metal tuning fork sensor principle based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 220g and minimum capacity of 100mg . The verification scale interval (e) is 1mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode (LCD) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply. The instrument has external weight calibration facility.

Figure-2: Schematic diagram ofsealing provision of the model

Onthe left rear side of the indicator , two holes are made through the nuts and bolts and fastened by a leaded wire for recieving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub -section (12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . The Central Government hereby declares that this certificate ofapproval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 50,000 or above for ' e ' value of 1mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (69)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 2061 G1/09-8 3272

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JUNE 13 , 2009 /JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii)]

दिल्ली, 21 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1644.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, निश्चित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपार्ट बल करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति दे को 476 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपजस बात को सभावना है कि सतार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों करता रहेगा।

अतः, अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अहिप - धारा 7 ; औ. दार। प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स इशिदा इंडिया प्रा. लि. , 191-ग्राउंड फ्लोर, उद्योग विहार का गुड़गांव -122016 ( हरियानाविनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यर्थाथतां वर्ग-11 ) वाले " यूबी- II " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अभ्वाचालित तोलन उपकरण टेबलटाण दाउप- प्रिसिजेन बैलेंस ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ISHIDA" ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उका पॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुपाः। चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/ 158 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है

उक्त मॉडल मोनो- मेटल ट्यूनिंग फोर्क संलम रिति पर आधारित कार्य करने अधिकतम क्षमता 820 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 ग्रा है । सत्यापन नापमान अन्तराम्यई है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधयतुमत लिक्ष्विड क्रिस्टल डायां भस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति रख सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धानपदास पर कार्य करता हैकरण में बाहरी तोलन केलिब्रेशन सुविधा है । आकृति- सीलिग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

سلام स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए वर कोलते हुए लोडिड सील वायर को दो छेद स्क्रूमें कस कर बांध दिया जाता है। उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ कर बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता। मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है।

उपकरण में कलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंचे है। पाडा बोलिशन तक पहुंच का राम क लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की भाग की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्य शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण-पत्र के अध्र्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्वाल, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , अर्थाथता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापनान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10k , 2 × 10kor 5 × 10h , मैं बनाता था ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 69 )/2009 ] आर माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 3273 भारत का राजपत्र : जून13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 21st April, 2009

S.O. 1644. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the CentralGovernment hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model ofnon -automic weighing instrument (Table top type-Precision Balance) with digital indication of High accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) of series " UB - II " and with brand name " ISHIDA " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Ishida India Pvt . Ltd. , 191 -Ground Floor, Udyog Vihar , Phase- IV, Gurgoan - Haryana - 122016 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/ 158 ;

The said model is working on mono - metal tuning fork sensor principle based non -automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 820g and minimum capacity of200mg . The verification scale interval (e) is 10mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The liquid crystal diode ( LCD ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply. The instrument has external weight calibration facility.

Fig.: 2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model

On the rear side of the indicator, a leaded sealing wire is fastened through two bored screws , passing over the cover and bracket, for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . Atypical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board. to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section (12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, The Central Government hereby declares that this certificate ofapproval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval (n) inthe range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100mg or more and with ' e value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (69 )/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 3274

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 21 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1645.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 कीउप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इशिदा इंडिया प्रा.लि. , 191 ग्राउंड फ्लोर , उद्योग विहार फेज- IV , गुड़गांव -122016 ( हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले " टी वाई " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप- कैरट बैलंस ) ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ISHIDA " ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/09/159 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक मोनो-मेटल ट्यूनिंग फोर्क सैंसर सिद्धांत पर आधारित कार्य करने वाला अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 120 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 मि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 1 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । उपकरण में बाहरी तोलन केलिब्रेशन सुविधा है । आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए इंडीकेटर के पिछली तरफ कवर और ब्रैकेट में से निकालते हुए लीडिड सील वायर को दो छेद स्क्रू में कस कर बाँध दिया जाता है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण-पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 या अधिक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2 × 10 के , 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (69 ) /2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 3275

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 21st April, 2009

S.O. 1645. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type -Carat Balance)) with digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy class- I ) of Series " TY" and with brand name "ISHIDA" (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured M/s . Ishida India Pvt . Ltd. , 191- Gronnd Floor, Udyog Vihar , Phase- IV, Gurgaon -Haryana- 122 016 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/ 159;

The said model is working on mono- metal tuning fork sensor principle based non - automatic weighing instrument with amaximum capacity of 120g and minimum capacity of 100mg . The verification scale interval (e) is 1mg. It has a tare device ;with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The liquid crystal diode (LCD ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply . The instrument has external weight calibration facility.

Fig. 2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

On the rear side of the indicator , a leaded sealing wire is fastened through two bored screws , passing over the cover and bracket, for recieiving the verifications tamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- section (12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of50,000 or above for ' e' value of 1mg or more amd with ' e' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (69)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 3278

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23. 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 21 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1647 केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इशिदा इंडिया प्रा.लि. , 191 ग्राउंड फ्लोर , उद्योग विहार फेज- IV , गुड़‌गांव 122016 ( हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " आई टी- II " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप - बैंच स्केल ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ISHIDA " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/09/161 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप - बैंच स्केल ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) । ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए इंडीकेटर के पिछली तरफ कवर और ब्रैकेट में से निकालते हुए लीडिड सील वायर को दो छेद स्क्रू में कस कर बाँध दिया जाता है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एकं प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के "ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तकं के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और "ई " मान 1 x10 , 2x10% , 5x10 के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 69 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3279 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

New Delhi , the 21st April , 2009

S.O. 1647. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type-Bench Scale ) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II) of Series " IT- II " and with brand name " ISHIDA" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Ishida India Pvt . Ltd. , 191- Gronnd Floor, Udyog Vihar , Phase - IV, Gurgoan -Haryana- 122 016 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/ 161 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type -Bench Scale) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 50g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 1g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The liquid crystal diode (LCD) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Fig. -2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

On the rear side of the indicator , a leaded sealng wire is fastened through two bored screws , passing over the cover and bracket, for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance ofsame series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verification scale interval (n) inthe range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k, 2x10k, or 5x10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (69)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 2061G1 /099 3280

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, JUNE 13 , 2009 /JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली . 21 अप्रैल, 2009

का.आ. 1648 केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें। बाट और माप मानक अधिनि 9476 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त स्वा प्रदान करता रहेगा,

अतः, अर्थ , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 16 की उप- धारा ( १ ) और उथ धाराह द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इशिदा इंडिया प्रा.लि. , 191 ग्राउंड फ्लोर, उद्योग विहार फेज IV , गुड़गांव याणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता (यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " आई टी- III " श्रृंखला के अंतक सूजन सहित अस्वचालित तोल पाटेबलटाप टाइप- बैंच स्केल ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ISHIDA " है ( जिसे इस्यं इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया हैं ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/09/ 162 सभ्नुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल प्राधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपवटेबलटाप टाइप- बैंच स्केल ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ग्रा है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आभेयतुलन प्रथात है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड एलडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृतिको सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध सायग्राम

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए इंडीकेटर के पिछल' तरफ कवर और बैंट एलीडिड सील वायर को दो छेद स्क्रू में कस कर बाँध दिया जाता है । उपकरण को सील से छड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में फेलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को राधान 'लम २/डी कार्ड/ मदर वोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,300 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के "ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्थापन सायमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और "ई " मान 1 x10 , 2 x10 * , 5x10 के हैं , जो धनात्मक था ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्य एम-21 ( 69 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 3281 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

New Delhi , the 21st April, 2009

S.O. 1648. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to' it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Non-Automatic Weighing Instrument (Table top type -Bench Scale ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III) of Series " IT- III " and with brand name " ISHIDA" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Ishida India Pvt . Ltd. , 191-Gronnd Floor , Udyog Vihar , Phase- IV, Gurgaon-Haryana- 122016 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09 / 162 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based Non- Automatic Weighing Instrument (Table top type- Bench Scale) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The liquid crystal diode (LCD) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure- 1 model

Figure 2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model .

Onthe rear side ofthe indicator , a leaded sealng wire is fastened through two bored screws , passing over the cover and bracket, for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is gtiven above ..

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg with verification scale interval (n) inthe range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1x10k , 2x10k or 5x10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (69)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 3282

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 21 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1649.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है किं उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उन - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इशिदा इंडिया प्रा.लि. , 191 ग्राउंड फ्लोर, उद्योग विहार फेज- IV , गुड़गांव-122016 ( हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " आई टी पी- II " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ISHIDA" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन. डी/09/ 09 / 163 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 250 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । वैक्यूम फ्लोरसेंट डायोड ( वी एफ डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए इंडीकेटर के पिछली तरफ कवर और ब्रैकेट में से निकालते हुए लीडिड सील वायर को दो छेद स्क्रू में कस कर बाँध दिया जाता है । उपकरण को सील छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के "ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 5,000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले और "ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 * , 5x10 * के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णाक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं'

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 69 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3283 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009 /ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

NewDelhi , the 21st April , 2009

S.O. 1649. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -Automatic Instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) of Series " ITP - II " and with brand name " ISHIDA" (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s . Ishida India Pvt . Ltd. , 191 -Gronnd Floor , Udyog Vihar , Phase- IV, Gurgoan -Haryana - 122 016 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/ 163 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing Instrument (Platform type ) with amaximum capacity of 150kg and minimum capacity of 250g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Vacuum Fluorescentl Diode (VFD) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure 1 model

000

Figure 2 Sealing Diagram

Onthe rear side of the indicator, a leaded sealng wire is fastened through two bored seerews , passing over the cover and bracket , for recieiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has been provided in A/D card/mother boardto disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub -section ( 12) ofSection 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and up to 5000 kg . with verification scale interval (n) inthe range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 , 2x10k, 5x10k,where k is . apositive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured. k

[F. No. WM - 21 (69)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 3284

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA. JUNE 13 , 2009 / JYAISTHA 23 103 :

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

नई दिल्ली , 21 अप्रैल , 2009

का.आ. 1650.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्तरिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम 1976 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त संदा प्रदान करता रहेगा ,

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स टी. सी. आई. क्यूपमेंट्स , 4/ 28-19 सी , वेंकटास्वामी ले आउट, अलगू नगर , कुरूची. सुन्दरपुत्य, कोयम्बतूर -641 024 ( तमिलनाडू) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " जेडीएन " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन महित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " GOLDEN " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉहत्य कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/09/ 09/49 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भाः सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार) तालन उपकरण है। इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

GOLDEN

ClassIII

Model:GDNIseries

Max30Kgmin100gme=5gm

आकृति-2 सीलिंग प्रावधान

इंडीकेटर के दाईं तरफ से ऊपरी कवर और निचली प्लेट को काटकर दो छेद किए गए हैं । इन दा छेदों को सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए लीड तार से जोड़ा गया है । उपकरण को सील के छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशनं तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड / मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्राम तक के "ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और "ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 * , 5 × 10 * के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 10 ) /2009]

आर माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3285

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13, 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 21st April , 2009

S.O. 1650. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III) ofSeries " GDN - I " and with brand name "GOLDEN " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. T.C.I. Equipments , 4/28-19C, Venkatasamy Lay- out, Alagu Nagar, Kuruchi , Sundarapuram , Coimbatore-641024 (T.N. ) which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/49 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing Instrument (Table top type) with amaximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e ) is 5g. It has a tare device with a100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 model

GOLDEN

ClassIII

Model:GDN1series

Max30Kgmin100gmc=5gm

Figure- 2: Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

From the right side of the indicator two holes are made by cutting the upper cover and bottom plate . These two holes are fastened by a leaded wire for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal.

The instrument has external access to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to exernal calibration. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate ofapproval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k, 2x10k, or 5x10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (10)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 3286

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JUNE 13 , 2009 /JYAISTHA 23. 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 21 अप्रैल , 2009

का.अ. 1651.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स टी.सी. आई. इक्यूपमेंट्स , 4 /28-19 सी, वेंकटास्वामी ले आउट , अलगू नगर, कुरूची . सुन्दरपुरम, कोयम्बटूर -641 024 ( तमिलनाडु ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग !!! ) वाले " जेडीएन- II " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " गोल्डन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिन्ह आई एन डी/ 09/ 09/50 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है। इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 सीलिंग प्रावधान

इंडीकेटर के दाईं तरफ से ऊपरी कवर और निचली प्लेट को काटकर दो छेद किए गए हैं । इन दो छेदों को सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए लीड तार से जोड़ा गया है । उपकरण को सील के छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 को उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण-पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 प्रा. या उससे अधिक के "ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 5,000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 के , 2x10 के 5x10के के हैं , जो घनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य को समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 10 ) /2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 3287

भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13, 2009 /ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi, the 21st April , 2009

S.O. 1651. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - Automatic Weighing Instrument (Plate form type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of Series " GDN - 2 " and with brand name "GOLDEN" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . T.C.I. Equipments, 4/28-19-C, Venkatasamy Layout, Alagu Nagar, Kuruchi , Sundarapuram, Coimbatore-641 024 (T.N. ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/50;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing Instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg and minimum capacity of 4 kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 200g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

Figure- 2 Sealing provision ofthe indicator ofmodel .

From the right side of the platform indicator two holes are made by cutting the upper cover and bottom plate . These two holes are fastened by a leaded wire for receving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal .

The instrument has external access to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to exernal calibration . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k, 2x10k, 5x10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 10)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1

2061 GI/09-10 3288

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13, 2009 /JYA THA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)]

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नईदिल्ली, 3 जून , 2009

का.आ. 1652.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो (प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनिक्ष्म ( 5 ) के उपविनियम (6) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तारीख से रद्द/ स्थगित कर दिया गया है: -

अनुसूची

क्रम सं.

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व प्ता

लाइसेंस संख्या सीएम/एल-

लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/ प्रकम सम्बद्ध भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

रद्द करने की तिथि 1.

7558894

17-3-2009

डिस्पोसेबल सरजिकल रबर ग्लबस आई एस 13422 : 1992

मैसर्स विजय लेटक्स प्रोडक्ट प्रा. लि. प्लाट नंबर 233 , जी आई डी सी अंबरगाँव , डिस्ट्रिक्ट वलसाद -396 171

7558995

सरजिकल रजर ग्लबस

17-3-2009

आई एस 4148: 1939

[सं. सी एम डी/13: 13 ]

पी के. गम्भीर, उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर) BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS New Delhi, the 3rd June , 2009

S.O. 1652. In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 6 ) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations , 1988 , ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which are given below have been cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each

SCHEDULE

Sl . No.

Name and Address of the Licensee

Licences No. CM/L-

Date of Cancellation

Article/ process with relevant Indian Standards covered by the licence cancelled

7558894

Vijay Latex Product Pvt. Ltd.

17-3-2009

Disposable Surgical Rubber Gloves IS 13422: 1992

Plot No. 233 , GIDC Umbrgaon, Distt Valsad - 396171

7558995

Vijay Latex Product Pvt. Ltd.

17-3-2009

Surgical Rubber Gloves

IS4148: 1989

Plot No. 233 , GIDC Umbrgaon ,

Distt. Valsad -396 171

[No. CMD/13 : 13 ]

P. K. GAMPHIP, Dy. Director General (Marks)

नई दिल्ली, 3 जून , 2009

का.आ. 1653.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम, 1983 के नियम 4 के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं: -

अनुसूची

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

वर्ष

भाग अनु

क्रम लाइसेंस संख्या संख्या

भामा संख्या

स्वीकृत करने की तिथि वर्ष/ माह

1 2

7 8

9 1. 7911379 02-03-2009

सबमर्सिबल पम्पसैट

हाई डिसचार्ज सबमर्सिबल पम्प

8034

2002 29, यादव एस्टेट , नवाब एस्टेट

के सामने , जी डी रोड , सैजपुर,

अहमदाबाद-382345 3289

भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , -2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1988

1783

7911783

03-03-2009

ड्रमस लार्ज फिक्स एंड्स ग्रेड बी ड्रम्स

शिवा उद्योग बैरर्स प्रा. लि. , यूनिट IV, जी आई डी सी प्लाट नंबर 201-204, पालेज इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया एस्टेट , पालेज , भारूच -392220

2002

8034

7912280

सबमर्सिबल पम्प सैट

04-03-2009 एकसल पम्प इंडस्ट्रीज , डी 1 बी, डायमंड पार्क, गुजरात एग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज के सामने , एन एच नंबर 8 , जी आई डी सी नरोडा , अहमदाबाद

1992

2002

05-03-2009

7912482

मैसर्स एसार स्टील लिमिटेड, 27 के एम , सूरत हजीरा रोड , पी ओ हजीरा , सूरत -394270

स्टील प्लेटफार प्रेशर वैसल फार इंटरमिडियेट तथा हाई टैम्परेचर सर्विस इंकलूडिंग बायलर

1999

1417

7913282

12-03-2009

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

श्री आभूषण गेकुल बिल्डिंग , नवा रामजी मंदिर केसामने , आनंद-388001

2004

2148

6 7913787 16-03-2009

फलेमप्प्रुफ एनकलोसरस फार इलैक्ट्रिकल एपरेटस

एमिको एलिकोन इलैक्ट्रिकल लिमिटेड, आनंद सोजितरा रोड, वल्लभ विद्यानगर, आनंद-388120

1988

3419

7917088

19-03-2009

फिटिंग फार रिजिड नान मैटलिक कांडयूट

निहिर पालिमर्स इंडस्ट्रीज , 809, कोठारी इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट संतेज, ताः कलोल; गांधीनगर -382721

1988

7098

7914890

20-03-2009

क्रासलिकड पालिथिलिन इंसूलेटिड पी वी सी शीथ्ड केबल

एकांक केबल लिमिटेड 15 , जी आई डी सी, मंजूसर, बड़ोदा, सावली-391775

1995

14255

एरियल बंचड केबल

20-03-2009

7915185

एकांक केबल लिमिटेड 15 , जी आई डी सी, मंजूसर, बड़ोदा , सावली-391775

1999

1417

10. 7915791 21-03-2009

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

नानालाल ज्वैलर्स, 6,795 से 798, मोटा बाजार , नवसारी -396445

2002

8034

सबमर्सिबल पम्पसैट

11. 7916187 23-03-2009 सूजल पम्प 54/55, विष्णु एस्टेट, रघुनाथ स्कूल के सामने, एल बी एस रोड, बापूनगर, अहमदाबाद

2001

3589

26-03-2009

12. 7917391

स्टील पाईप फार वाटर तथासिवेज

हजीरा पाईप मिल लिमिटेड 27 के एम, हजीरा रोड, मार्शलिंग यार्ड के पास , पी ओ हजीरा , सूरत- 394270

1994

14220

26-03-2009

13. 7917492

ओपन वैल सबमर्सिबल पम्पसैट

मसकट पम्प लिमिटेड 13 , जी आई डी सी फेस 1 , नरोडा, अहमदाबाद -383330 3290

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009 /JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] 2

7 8

9 14. 7918191 30-03-2009

2062

स्टील फार जनरल

1999

स्टकचरल परपस

अंबिका आयरन तथा स्टील री-रोलिंग मिल , सर्वे नंबर 261 , विसनगर मेहसाना रोड , गाँव सावाला , ताःविसनगर, मेहसाना 384 001

15. 7918292 30-03-2009

पैकेजबंद पेयजल

14543

2004 ओम बिवरेज, 8 व 9 , सरदार एस्टेट , रिलायेंस पम्पके सामने, इसनपुर नारोल हाइवे , अहमदाबाद -382 405

16. 7918393 30-03-2009

पैकेजबंद पेयजल

14543

2004 पमा इंडस्ट्रीज ढोलका, ढोलका सरखेज रोड,, अहमदाबाद

17. 7918595 30-03-2009

3575

1993

बिटुमन ड्रम

शिवा उद्योग बैरर्स प्रा. लि. , यूनिट IV जी आई डी सी प्लाट नंबर 201-204 , पालेज इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , एस्टेट , पालेज , भारूच 392 220

18. 7918696 30-03-2009

8112

1989

43 ग्रेड आडिनरी पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

विराट बांड गुजरात सीमेंट प्रा. लि. , ब्लाक नंबर 683, एट मंजूसर बड़ोदा सावला रोड, ताल्लुका: सावली , डिस्टिक्ट बड़ोदा, गुजरात

19. 7918797

12269

30-03-2009

1987

53 ग्रेड आडिनरी पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

विराट बांड गुजरात सीमेंट प्रा. लि. , ब्लाक नंबर 683 , एट मंजूसर बड़ोदा सावला रोड , ताल्लुका: सावली , डिस्टिक्ट बड़ोदा , गुजरात

20. 7918801 30-03-2009

पैकेजबंद पेयजल

14543

2004 ईवा हैल्थ केयर तथा बिवरेज एट वाडू, ताल्लुका पादरा , बडोदा

21. 7919193 31-03-2009

14543

पैकेजबंद पेयजल

2004 गोरस डेरी प्रोडक्ट , ब्लाक नंबर 89 , पी. सर्वे नंबर 895 , न्यूअरविंद मिल के सामने , एट खतराज , ता : कलोल , गांधीनगर -382 761

22. 7919294 31-03-2009

303

1989

प्लाईवुड फार जनरल परपस

गुजरात वुड प्रोडक्ट, ब्लाक नंबर 104 , किम चार रस्ता के पास , गांव पालोड , ताल्लुका मंगरोल , सूरत

23. 7919395 31-03-2009

पैकेजबंद पेयजल

14543

2004 देसाई कार्पोरेशन , प्लाट नंबर 38/39 , न्वसारी इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , नवसारी

24. 7919496

पैकेजबंद पेयजल

14543

31-03-2009

2004 ए वी पटेल मिनरल इंडस्ट्रीज , एट पोस्ट नादिसर , एट ताल्लुका गोधरा, पंचमहल-389 001

25. 7919601

पैकेजबंद पेयजल

31-03-2009

14543

2004 दमनगंगा फूड तथा बिवरेज, गाला नंबर 4, प्लाट नंबर 136/ एफ/2 , दूसरा फेस, यूनियन एंटरप्राईस , जी आई डीसी वापी. ताल्लुका पारडी, वलसाद, गुजरात 3291 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009 /ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(9)

(7) (8)

(6)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(1) (2)

2004

14543

पैकेजबंद पेयजल

31-03-2009

26. 7919702

मैसर्स मन बिवरेज प्लाट नंबर 50 , गुरूकृपा इंडस्ट्रीज सोसाइटी, सफारी कॉम्पलैक्स के पीछे, बेसटन सूरत

1990

694

31-03-2009

27. 7919803.

पीवी सी इंसूलेटिड केबल.

मैसर्स मीनाक्षी एंटरप्राईस 34, नारायण एस्टेट, सीएम सी के पास, श्रीराम इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट केसामने , ओढव अहमदाबाद

1999

1417

31-03-2009

28. 7920279

मैसर्स पंचरत्ना ज्वैलर्स प्रा.लि. 2, टाइम स्कवेयर , लाल बंगला के पास, सी जी रोड, अहमदाबाद

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

1999

1417

31-03-2009

29. 7920380

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं

नानालाल एन चोकसी 4/672, मोटा बाजार पी ओ नवसारी-396445

2004

14543

मुहरांकन पैकेजबंद पेयजल

31-03-2009

30. 7920885

श्री कृष्णा एंटरप्राईस एल 2108 , रोड नंबर 2 , बांई तरफ, जी आई डी सी सचिनसूरत

[सं. सीएमडी/13: 11 ]

पी. के. गम्भीर, उपमहानिदेशक ( मुहर )

NewDelhi , the ardJune , 2009

S.O.1653 .-In pursuance of sub -regulation (5)of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

Year

Part Sec

ISNo.

Title ofthe Standard

Grant Date

Licences No.

Name and Address of the party

SL No.

(9)

( 7) ( 8 )

(6)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(1) (2)

2002

8034

Submersible Pumpsets

02-03-2009

7911379

High Discharge Submersible Pump, 29 , Yadav Estate, Opp. Navab Estate, G.D. Road, Saijpur , Ahmedabad- 382345

1988

03-03-2009

2. 7911783

Drums , large fixed ends , 1783 Grade B drums

Shiva Udyog Barrels Pvt . Limited-Unit IV GI.D.C. PlotNo. 201-204, Palej Industrial Area Estate, Palej,Bharuch-392220

2002

8034

Submersible Pumpsets

05-03-2009

7912280

ExcelPump Industries D- 1 /B Diamond Park, Opp. GujaratAgro Ind. N.H. NO. 8 , G.I.D. C. Naroda, Ahmedabad 3292

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 13 , 2009/JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) (1) (2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6) (7) (8 ) (9) 4. 7912482 05-03-2009

1992

2002

Essar Steel Ltd. 27 KM, Surat - Hazira Road, P.O. Hazira, Surat -394270

Steel plates for pressure vessels for intermediate &high temperature service including boilers

5. 7913282 12-03-2009

1417

1999

Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery/Arefacts- Fineness and Marking

Shree Abhushan GokulBuilding, Opp. Nava Ramji Mandir, Anand-388001

6. 7913787 16-03-2009

2148

2004

Flame proof enclosures for electrical apparatus

Eimco Elecon Electricals Limited, Anand Sojitra Road , Anand, 388120 Vallabh Vidyanagar ,

7. 7917088 19-03-2009

3419

1988

metallic conduits Fittings for rigid non-

Nihir Polymers Industries 809, Kothari Industrial Estate Santej , TA - Kalol, Gandhi Nagar-382721

8. 7914890 20-03-2009

1988

7098

Ekank Cables Limited 15 , GIDC, Savli Manjusar Vadodara- 391775

Crosslinked polyethylene insulated PVC sheathed cables

9. 7915185 20-03-2009

Aerial Bunched Cables 14255

1995 Ekank Cables Limited 15, GIDC , Savli Manjusar Vadodara- 391775

10. 7915791 21-03-2009

1417

1999

Gold and Gold Alloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking

Nanalal Jewellers 6,795 to 798 , Mota Bazar, Navsari , 396445

11. 7916187 23-03-2009

8034

2002

Submersible Pump Sets

Sujal Pumps 54/55, Vishnu Estate, Opp. Raghunath School , LBS Road,Bapunagar, Ahmedabad

12. 7917391 26-03-2009

3589

2001

Steel Pipes for Water and Sewage

Hazira Pipe Mill Limited 27KM, Hazira Road, Near Marshalling Yard, P.O. -Hazira, Surat-394270

13. 7917492 26-03-2009

14220

1994

Openwell Submersible Pumpsets

Mascot Pump Ltd. 13 , GIDC , Phase- 1 , Naroda, Ahmedabad- 383330

14. 7918191 30-03-2009

2062

1999

Steel forGeneral Structural Purposes

Ambica Iron & Steel Re- Rolling Mills , ServeyNo. 261, Visnagar -Mehsana Road, Village Savala, TA , VisnagarMehsana-384001

15. 7918292 30-03-2009

2004

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

AumBeverages 8 & 9 , SardarEstate , Opp . Reliance Petrol Pump, Isanpur-Narol Highway, Ahmedabad- 382405

16. 7918393 30-03-2009

2004

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

Pamma Industries Dholka, Dholka- Sarkhej Road, Dist Ahmedabad

17. 7918595 30-03-2009

Bitumendrums

3575

1993 Shiva Udyog Barrels Pvt. Limited-Unit IV G.I.D.C. , PlotNo. 201-204, Palej Industrial Area Estate , Palej, Bharuch -392220 3293 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

(5)

(4)

(3)

(1) (2)

1989 30-03-2009

8112

43 grade ordinary Port-

18. 7918696

VirantBond (Gujarat) Cement Pvt. Ltd., Block No. 683, At. land cement Manjusar, Baroda SavliRoad, Taluka Savii, Dist-Baroda(Guj)

12269

1987 30-03-2009

19. 7918797

53 grade ordinaryPort-

land cement

ViraatBond(Gujarat) Cement Pvt. Ltd., Block No. 683 AT. ManjusarBaroda SavliRoad, Taluka Savli Dist Baroda(Guj)

2004 30-03-2009

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

20. 7918801

EvaHealthCare& Beverages At-Vadu, Taluka-Padra, Vadodara

2004 31-03-2009

14543

PackagedDrinking Water

21. 7919193

GorasDairy Products , BlockNo. 89, P Sarve No. 895, Opp. New ArvindMill, At Khatraj, TA. Kalol, Dist: Gandhi Nagar. 382761

1989

303

31-03-2009

22. 7919294

Plywood for general

purposes

Gujarat Wood, Products, BlockNo. 104, Near Kim CharRasta, Village Palod, TalukaMangrol, Surat, 394110

2004

14543

31-03-2009

PackagedDrinking Water

23. 7919395

Desai Corporation, PlotNo.38/39, Navsari Industrial Estate , Navsari ,Gujarat -396424

2004 31-03-2009

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

24. 7919496

AVPatel Mineral Industries , AtPost Nadisar, At Taluka- Godhra, Panchmahal -389001

2004

14543

PackagedDrinking Water

31-03-2009

25. 7919601

Damanganga Foods & Beverages , Gala No.4, Plot. No. 136/F/2, Second Phase, Union Enterprises , G.L.D.C. Vapi, Taluka Pardi , Valsad,Gujrat

2004

14543

PackagedDrinking Water

31-03-2009

7919702

26.

Mann Beverages, PlotNo. 50, Guru Krupa Ind. Society, B/H Safari Complex, Bhestan, Surat

1990

694

PVC Insulated Cables

31-03-2009

27. 7919803

Minaxi Enterprises, 34, NarayanEstate, Near C.M.C. , Opp . Shri Ram Industrial Estate, Odhav, Ahmedabad

1999

1417

7920279 31-03-2009

28.

Gold andGoldAlloys ,

Jewellery/Artefacts-

Fineness and Marking

PanchratnaJewellers Pvt. Ltd. , 2, Time Square, Near Lal Bunglow, C.G. Road, Ahmedabad

1999

1417

31-03-2009

29. 7920380

GoldandGoldAlloys, Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking

Nanalal N. Choksi, 4/672, Motabazar , P.O. Navsari-396445

2004

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

31-03-2009

30. 7920885

Shree Krishna Enterprises, L-2108, Road No. 2, LeftSide, G.I.D.C. Sachin, Surat

[No. CMD/13 : 11 ]

P. K. GAMBHIR,Dy. Director General (Marks) 3294

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009 /JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[Part II Sec. 3 (ii) ]

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नईदिल्ली, 9 जून, 2009

का. आ. 1654.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( क) के अनुसरण में , तारीख 15 सितम्बर , 2007 में प्रकाशित , भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का०आ० 2594 तारीख 05 सितम्बर , 2007 में निम्नलिखित रूप से संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्: -

उक्त अधिसूचना की अनुसूची के स्तम्भ 1 में , " श्री एल . वैंकटसुबैया, डेपुटी कलेक्टर " , शब्दों के स्थान पर " श्रीमति रजिया बेगम, स्पेशल डेपुटी कलेक्टर " , शब्द रखे जाएंगे ।

[फा. सं. आर-25011/10/2006- ओ.आर. - 1 ] बी. के. दत्ता, अवर सचिव Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas

New Delhi , the 9th June , 2009

S. O. 1654. In pursuance of clause ( a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry ofPetroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 2594 dated the 05th September , 2007 , published in the Gazette of India on the 15th September , 2007, namely : -

In the said notification , in the Schedule , in column 1 , for the words , " Shri L. Venkata Subbaiah , Deputy Collector " , the words , " Smt . Razia Begam , Special Deputy Collector " , shall be substituted .

[F. No. R- 25011 /10/2006- O.R. - I ] B. K. DATTA , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 9 जून, 2009

का. आ. 1655.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय के का.आ.स. 2362 दिनांक 6 अगस्त, 2008 एवं का.आ.स. 3343 दिनांक 3 दिसम्बर , 2008 द्वारा पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन अधिसचूना प्रकाशित कर कोट पम्पिंग स्टेशन से कोटड़ी टर्मिनल स्टेशन तक" अपरिष्कृत तेल परिवहन के लिए उक्त अधिसूचना में विनिर्दिष्ट तहसील बाली जिला पाली राजस्थान राज्य की भूमि अधिसूचित की थी ।

और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को दिनांक 19.02.2009 से 25.02.2009 तक उपलब्ध करवा दी गई थी !

और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा (1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी राजस्थान ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उवत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का विनिश्चय किया है । 3295 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23, 1931

[ खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।

अनुसूची

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा सं.

ग्राम

तहसील

जिला

राज्य

सं.

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हैक्टेयर

भीटवाडा

बाली

पाली

राजस्थान

86/1458

674.

670

131

[फा. सं. आर-25011/8/2006- ओ.आर.- I ]

बी. के. दत्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th June, 2009

8. 0. 1665-Whereas by a notification of the Government of India. Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S.O. Number 2362 dated 6.8.08 and SO No. 3343 dated 03.12.2008 issued under Sub-Section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) (Headquarter referred as the said Act ) the Central government declared its intention to acquire the right ofuser in the land in Tehsil Bali , Distt Pali in the state of Rajasthan , specified in the Schedule appended to that notification of the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Crude Oil from KOT pumping Station to Kotadi Terminal Station in the state of Rajasthan, a pipeline should be laid by the indian Oil corporation Limited for implementing the Augmentation of Mundra - Panipat Pipeline System.

Andwhereas , copies of the said gazette notification was made available to the general public on the 19.02.2009 to 25.02.09 .

Andwhereas , the competent Authority has , under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, Submitted his report to the Central Government .

2061 G1/09-11 196

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13, 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[Part II-Sec. 3 (if) Andwhereas, the Central Government , after considering the said report is satisfied that sight of user in the land specified in the schedule appended to this Notification should be acquired.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, inexercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government vests from the date of publication of this declaration in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances

SCHEDULE

Sr. No.

District Tehsil

Stage

Area

Village Survey / Plot No. Hectre Area Sq.Meter 1

9 1

Pali

Bali Bhitwara

Rajasthan

86/1458

674

670

131

[F. No. R-25011/8/2006-O.R. -I ]

B. K. DATTA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली,१जून, 2009

केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय के का.आ. 2072 दिनांक 24.07.2008 , द्वारा पेट्रोलियम और ग्वनिज पाइपलाइन्स ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) ( जिम उसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा जायेगा ) की धाग 3 ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचना प्रकाशित कर. राजस्थान राज्य के जिला भरतपुर के रूध रारह गांव से राजस्थान राज्य के जिला भरतपुर के जधीना गांव में स्थित भरतपुर मार्केटिंग टर्मिनल तक मथुरा भरतपुर पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद परिवहन के लिए इण्डियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरशन लिमिटेड द्वारा "पट्रोलियम और मानिज पाइपलाइन्य के सम्वन्ध में उक्त अधिमुचना ये मंलग्न अनुमूची में निर्दिष्ट तहगीन्न कुम्हेर और भरतपुर जिल्ला भरतपुर ( गजग्थान राज्य ) की 'भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आभ्य की घोपणा की थी. और, उक्त अधिसुचना की प्रतियां जनता का दिनांक 10-12-2008 में 22-12-2008 को उपलब्ध कग दी गई थी,

और, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधाग ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम याधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

और कंन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् इस अधिसूचना में उपावद्ध अनुसूची में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का विनिश्चय किया है ।

अतः अव, केन्दीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धाग 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्राग पटत्त अक्तियां का पयोग करते हुए घोपणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना में उपावद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन विछान के उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धाग 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा पटत्न शक्तियो का प्रयोग करते हुए यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की वजाय मभी विल्लंगमां से मुक्त होकर इण्डियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा। [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

3297

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13, 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

अनुसूचि जिला - भरतपुर

तहसील

गांव का नाम

सर्वे / ब्लाक नं.

हेक्टेयर 1

946

रारह

कुम्हेर

947

949

950

951

952

1046

1047

1053

1052

1111

1100

1110

1101

1108

1103

321

00 रुध रारह

भरतपुर

317

427

426

493

490

491

489

488

487

486

482

485

505 सरकारी भूमि

515

00 राज्य- राजस्थान

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

01 3298

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

तहसील

गाव का नाम

सर्वे / ब्लाक न

हेक्टेयर 1

516

00 भरतपुर

517

00 दुध रारह (जारी)

519

518

522

537

538

539

542

543

550

551

560

561

562

563

शहनावली

00 भरतपुर

143

138

137

147

148

222

223

241

240

236

238

237

317

300

302

301

[Part II Sec. 3 (1) क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

(14

16 3290

भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009/ण्येष्ठ 23, 1931

-3 (ii) ]

गांव का नाम

सर्वे/ ब्लाक नं.

हसील

हेक्टेयर

303

भरतपुर

299

शहनावली (जारी)

305

304

306

312

365

364

361

369

371

405

404

406

407

402

403

400

399

धोरमई

भरतपुर

00 क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

57 सरकारी भूमि

168

170

162

192

161

193

194

195

00 3300

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

तहसील

गांव का नाम

सर्वे / ब्लाक नं.

हेक्टेयर 1

5 भरतपुर

200

210

धोरमई (जारी)

212

219

222

220

221

226

225

320

322

316

323

315

324

314

301

300

302

295 सरकारी भूमि

276

277

274

278

281

282

283

285

00 भरतपुर

जघीना

913

915

916

917

918

920

919

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( क्षेत्रफल

एयर

वर्ग मीटर 6

32 3301 भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

सर्वे / ब्लाक नं.

तहसील

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

924

जघीना

भरतपुर

922

(जारी)

1424 सा. नि. वि.

2481

2480

2483

2479

2474

2475

2461

2462

2450

[फा. सं. आर-25011/2/2008- ओ.आर. - 1 ]

बी. के . दत्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th June , 2009

S. O. 1656. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , published in the Gazette of India vide number S.O. 2072 dated 24th July 2008 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Product from Rundh Rarh Village of Bharatpur District of the State of Rajasthan to Bharatpur marketing Terrninal at Jaghina village of Bharatpur District in the State of Rajasthan by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines " in Tehsil Kumher and Bharatpur, District Bharatpur, in Rajasthan State;

And whereas , copies of the said gazette notification were made available to the public on 10-12-2008 to 22-12-08.

And whereas , the Competent Authority has under sub - section ( 1 ) of section . 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report to the Central Government.

Andwhereas, the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of users in the said land, specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is acquired:

And, further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4 ) of section 6 1 the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of users in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government . vest from the date of publication of this declaration , in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii) ]

SCHEDULE

Dist:- Bharatpur

Tehsil Name of Village Survey/Block/No .

Hectare 1

4 Kumher

Rarah

946

947

949

950

951

952

1046

1047

1053

1052

1111

1100

00:

1110

1101

1108

1103

Bharatpur Rundh Rarah

321

317

427

426

493

490

491

489

488

487

486

482

485

505 Govt Land

515

00 State:- Rajasthan

Area

Are

Sg. Mtr .

ハン

00 13, 2009/ पेष्ठ 23, 1931 Tehsil

Hectare

Survey/Block/No.

Name of Village

516

Bharatpur

517

Rundh Rarah (Contd.)

519

518

522

537

538

539

542

543

550

551

560

561

562

563

Sahnavali

Bharatpur

143

138

137

147

148

222

223

241

240

-00

236

238

237

317

300

302

301

Area

Are

Sq . Mtr

6 5

80 04

10 01

20 03

20- 00

00 05

50 01

36 03

80 04

80 03

40 05

20 03

90 03

10 03

76 04

80 00

00 04

80 05

20 04

50 05

30 04.

CO 04

70 05

40 05

30 08

00 03

60 03

00 03

00 05

15 00

80 00

40. 04

28 00

16 00 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

Tehsil Name of Village Survey/Block/No .

Hectare 1

4 Sahnavali

303

Bharatpur

299

00 (Contd.)

305

304

306

312

365

364

361

369

371

405

404

406

407

402

403

400

399

00 Dhormai

Bharatpur

[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii) ] Area

Are

Sq. Mtr .

57 Govt . Land

168

170

162

192

161

193

194

195

00 01

10 3305

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23, 1931

I- खण्ड 3 ( ii)]

Tehsil

Survey/Block /No. Name of Village

Hectare

200

Bharatpur

210

Dhormai (Contd.)

212

219

222

220

221

226

225

320

322

316

323

315

324

314

301

300

302

00 Area

Are

Sq . Mtr.

295 Govt . Land

276

277

274

278

281

282

283

285

913

Jaghina

Bharatpur

915

916

917

918

920

919

80 03

24 00

56 00

32 02 3306

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[Part II-Sec. 3 (il)]

Area

Tehsil Name of Village Survey/Block / No.

Are

Hectare

Sq . Mtr .

924

05 Bharatpur

Jaghina

922

いい

60 (Contd.)

1424 P.W.D

2481

2480

2483

2479

2474

2475

2461

2462

2450

[ F. No. R-25011/ 2/2008- O.R. - I ] B. K. DATTA , Under Secy.

नईदिल्ली, 11 जून , 2009

का. आ. 1657.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण में , भारत के राजपत्र में दिनांक 3 दिसम्बर , 2005 को प्रकाशित , पेट्रोलियम एवं प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की दिनांक 30 नवम्बर , 2005 की अधिसूचना सं . का.आ. 4526 और दिनांक 6 अक्तूबर को प्रकाशित दिनांक 28 सितम्बर, 2007 के का.आ. सं . 2934 में एत‌द्वारा निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है:

उस अधिसूचना में , अनुसूची के कॉलम ( 1 ) में

i) दिनांक 30 नवम्बर , 2005 के का.आ. संख्या 4526 की क्रम सं . 7 में श्री ए.के. गर्ग , वरिष्ठ प्रचालन प्रबंधक , इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , पश्चिमी क्षेत्र पाइपलाइन्स , राजोला , गांव कंटालिया/राजोला , पोऑ. एवं वाया सोजत रोड, जिला पाली , राजस्थान 306106' शब्दों के स्थान पर ' श्री विकास सारसवत , उप प्रबंधक प्रचालन , पश्चिमी क्षेत्र पाइपलाइन्स , सेन्दड़ा जिला पाली(राजस्थाव)-306 102' शब्दों को प्रतिस्थापित किया जाए ।

ii) दिनांक 28.9.2007 के का.आ. सं. 2934 के कॉलम (iii ) में 'श्री गौतम दास; वरिष्ठ तकनीकी सेवाएं प्रबंधक , इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , पश्चिमी क्षेत्र पाइपलाइन्स , पोस्ट बॉक्स नं. 1007 ,मोरवी रोड , गौरीदड़,जिला राजकोट -360030( गुजरात)' शब्दों के स्थान पर ' श्री सुरेश पी . डोडिया , वरिष्ठ प्रचालन एवं अनुरक्षण इंजीनियर , इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , पश्चिमी क्षेत्र पाइपलाइन्स , गौरीदड़ ' शब्दों को प्रतिस्थापित किया जाए । 3307 भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13, 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

'श्री विजय जैन, उप प्रबंधक प्रचालन, सक्षम प्राधिकाड़ी , इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, पश्चिमी क्षेत्र पाइपलाइन्स , रतलाम ' '36-मधुबन सोसायटी ,' कस्तूरबा नगर , रतलाम (मध्य प्रदेश)-457 001 को मध्य प्रदेश राज्य के लिए एक नए सक्षम प्राधिकारी के रूप में घोषित किया. जाए ।

[फा. सं. आर-25011/9/2007-ओ.आर.-I ]

बी. के. दत्ता, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 11th June , 2009

3. 0. 137-in pursuance of clause (a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notifications of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , Notification number S.O. 4526 dated 30th November, 2005 published in the Gazette of India on 3rd December, 2005 and number S.O. 2934 dated 28th September , 2007, published in the Gazette of India on 6th October , 2007 , namely: -

In the said notification , in the Schedule , in column (1 ) .

i) . Number S.O. 4526 dated 30th November , 2005 , Sl . No.7 for the words "Shri A.K. Gurg, Senior Operations Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited , Western Region Pipeline , Rajola, Vill . Kantaliya/Rajola , P.O. & Via Sojat Road , Distt. Pali , Rajasthan-306106" the words, " Shri Vikas Sarswat , Deputy Manager Operations, Indian Oil Corporation Limited , Western Region Pipelines , Sendra " P.O. Sendra, Distt. Pali (Rajasthan)-306 102, maybe substituted.

ii ) Number S.O. 2934 dated 28.9.2007column ( iii ) , for the words " Shri Gautam Das , Senior Technical Services Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Western Region Pipelines , " Post Box No.1007, Morvi Road , Gauridad, Distt. Rajkot-360030(Gujarat) , the words , " Shri Suresh P. Dodia , Senior Operations and Maintenance Engineer, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Western Region Pipelines , Gauridad" may be substituted.

iii) . "Shri Vijay Jain , Deputy Manager Operations , Indian Oil Corporation Limited , Western Region Pipelines , Ratlam , " 36- Madhuban Society, Kasturba Nagar, Ratlam (Madhya Pradesh) -457 001 , maybe declared as new Competent Authority for the State of Madhya Pradesh.

[F. No. R-25011/9/2007-O.R. -I ]

B. K. DATTA; Under Secy.

3308

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

श्रम और रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 1 मई , 2009

का.आ. 1658 राष्ट्रपति , श्री राम किशन यादव को 21-4-2009 से उनके 65 वर्ष की आयु के होने तक अर्थात् 7-6-2014 तक अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक, जो भी पहले हो , केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण- सह- श्रम न्यायालय संख्या 1 , नई दिल्ली के पीठासीन अधिकारी के पद पर नियुक्त करते हैं ।

[सं. ए-11016/6/2007-सी एल एस- II ] पी. के. ताम्रकर , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT NewDelhi, the 1st May, 2009

S.O. 1658 -The President is pleased to appoint Shri Ram Kishan Yadav as Presiding Officer ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court No. 1 , New Delhi w.e.f. 21-4-2009 till he attains the age 65 years i.e. up to 7-6-2014 or until further orders , whichever is earlier .

[No. A- 11016/6/2007 -CLS- II ] P. K. TAMRAKAR, Under Secy.

नईदिल्ली , 13 मई , 2009

का.आ. 1659.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी. सी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , संख्या 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 81/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/23/2002- आईआर ( सी -1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th May, 2009

S.O.1659. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 81/2003 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, No. I , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . B.C.C. Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 13-5-2009.

[No. L-20012/23/2002- IR(C-I)) SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. I, DHANBAD In the matter of a reference U/s . 10( 1 )(d) (2A) of I. D. Act . Reference No. 81 of2003

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of GovindpurArea- II of M/s . B.C. C. Ltd.

AND

TheirWorkman

Present : Shri H. M. Singh, PresidingOfficer

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] APPEARANCES

Forthe Employers : Shri D. K. Verma, Advocate Forthe Workmen Shri S. N. Goswami , Advocate State Jharkhand Industry: Coal

Dated, the 27th April, 2009 AWARD

By Order No. L - 20012 /23 /2002 - IR (C- I) dated 18-8-2003 the Central Government in the Ministry ofLabour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

अनुसूची

" क्याराष्ट्रीय कोलियरी मजदूर संघ की भारत कोकिंग कोल लिमिटेड , गोविन्दपुर क्षेत्र- II के प्रबधतंत्र से मांग कि सुरेश दसोंधी ट्रांस्पोर्ट मुंशी के पद पर नियमित किया जाये उचित एवं न्याय संगत है ? यदि हाँ तो कर्मकार किस राहत के पात्र हैं तथा किस तारीख से ? "

2.The present reference case had already been fixed for adducing evidence by the workman on 21-5-2009. But on 26-3-2009 Sri S. N. Goswami , Advocate , appeared with the concerned workman and filed a petition along with office order issued by General Manager ( P & IR) , BCCL praying for withdrawal the case .

3. In view of such submission made by Sri Goswami , Advocate and the concerned workman , I pass a ' No Dispute' award in the present case .

H. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 13 मई , 2009

का.आ. 1660.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी. सी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 14/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-20012/234/99- आईआर ( सी -1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th May , 2009

S.O.1660 . In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 14/2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. I , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . B.C.C. Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 13-5-2009.

[No. L-20012/234/99- IR(C- I )] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer 3309

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009 /ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[आग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 13th May, 2009 ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. I, DHANBAD

In the matter of a reference U/s . 10(1 )(d) (2A) ofl . D.Act. Reference No. 14 of2000

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Keshalpur Colliery ofM/s . B.C. C. Ltd. AND TheirWorkman

S.O.1661 . In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 118/ 1999) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, No. I Dhanbad now as shown in the annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . B.C.C. Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-5-2009.

Present : Shri H. M. Singh, Presiding Officer APPEARANCES

Forthe Employers : None

[No. L- 20012/51 /99 -IR (C-I)] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

Forthe Workmen : None

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT State Jharkhand : Industry: Coal

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALNO . I, DHANBAD Dated, the 27th April, 2009

AWARD

Inthe matter ofa reference U /s . 10( 1 )(d) (2A) ofI . D. Act. Reference No. 118 of 1999

Parties:Employers in relation to the management of KoylaBhawan of M/s . B.C. C. L. AND Their Workmen

By Order No. L- 20012 /234 /99 - IR (C- I ) dated 20-12-99 the Central Government in the Ministry ofLabour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section(1 ) and sub- section (2A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following dispute foradjudication to this Tribunal:

Present: Shri H. M. Singh, Presiding Officer APPEARANCES

SCHEDULE

FortheEmployers : None

Forthe Workmen : None

State: Jharkhand Industry : Coal

Dated, the 28th April, 2009

AWARD

"Whether the action ofthe management ofKeshalpur Colliery ofM/s. BCCL in dismissing Sri Rohan Das, O/Khalasi/S . P. Helper from the service of the company w.e.f. 18/ 19-4-97 on the ground of unauthorised absence from duty from 19-9-95 is justified? Ifnot, to what reliefthe concernedworkman is entitled?"

2.5-3-2009was fixed for appearance and for filing written statement by the workman . But neither the concerned workmen nor his representative was present inspite ofnotice sent by speed post.

By Order No. L-20012/ 51 / 99 - IR ( C - I ) dated 4-6-1999, the Central Government in the Ministry ofLabour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1 ) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

3. In view of such circumstances it is presumed that the workman is not interested to contest the case. Since 6-1-2000 the workman is not taking any interest to contest the case. It is needless to keep this reference case pending.

"Whether the demand ofthe Union for regularisation of S/Sri Durga Mahto and Kishan Mahto as fitter- helper in Excavation Gr. E with retrospective effect is justified? If so to what relief the workmen are entitled and from what date?"

4. In such circumstances , I render a ' No Dispute' Award in the present reference case.

H. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली , 13 मई, 2009

2.None appeared from either side inspite of notices being sent by speed post nor the written statement on behalfofthe workmen was filed till 28-1-2009. This case is pending for filling ofwritten statement by the workmen. It appears that concerned workmen are not interestedto contest their case .

3. In such circumstances , I render a ' No Dispute ' Award in the present case.

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 13 मई , 2009 का.आ. 1661. औद्योगिक विवादः अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी. सी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , संख्या I, धनबाद के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 118/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

का.आ. 1662.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी.सी.सी.एल [सं. एल-20012/51/99- आईआर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी 3310

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii )] के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , संख्या I, धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 72/1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/41/1996-आईआर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

Thereafter , the sponsoring union raised an industrial dispute before the A.L.C. (C) , Dhanbad . The conciliation proceeding ended in failure and the Ministry of Labour has referred the dispute before this Tribunal for adjudication . It has been stated that the concerned is entitled for regularisation in time-ratedjob as per provision ofSection 7.2 and 7.5 of the certified standing order ofthe company. It has been prayed that the Tribunal be pleased to pass an award regularising the concerned workman in time- rated job with retrospective effect .

New Delhi, the 13th May, 2009

S.O.1662.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 72/1997) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. I, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . B.C.C. Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-5-2009.

[No. L-20012/41 / 1996- IR (C-I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. I, DHANBAD

Inthe matter ofa reference U/s . 10( 1 )( d) (2A) of I.D. Act .

Reference No. 72 of 1997

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Bhowra Coke Plant of M/s . B.C. C. Ltd. AND TheirWorkmen

Present: Shri H. M. Singh, Presiding Officer APPEARANCES

Forthe Employers : Shri B. M. Prasad, Advocate

3. The case of the management is that the present reference is not legally maintainable . The concerned workman is working as piece- rated mazdoor at Bhowra Coke Plant and he holds the permanent status of a piece - rated worker . He does not hold any status of a time - rated worker and, as such, the question of his regularisation in time- rated job did not and cannot arise . It has been submitted that during certain emergency condition existing in an establishment , the piece - rated worker may be provided alternate employment on time-rated jobs and vice -versa . There is no provision for regularisation of piece- rated jobs merely because they were offered temporary employment against temporary vacancy or were provided alternate employment due to non - availabilty of jobs of their permanent respective status . It has been stated that as the concerned workman holds the permanent status of a piece- rated worker , he cannot demand for his conversion and regularisation on time -rated job , although , the management atits discrimination may provide him time- ratedjobs under certain exigencies of circumstances or by way of alternate employment or to meet certain difficulties faced by the workman himself. In no circumstances , the management has any obligation to regularise a piece - rated worker on time-rated jobs or a time - rated worker on piece-ratedjobs . It has been submitted that the concerned workman is not entitled to be regularised on any time - rated job on any ground whatsoever .

For the Workmen Shri R. Rai , Representative State Jharkhand :

Industry: Coal

Dated, the 20th April, 2009

AWARD

In rejoinder the management has been denied that the concerned workman was a piece - rated worker and he holds permanent status on piece- rated group . It has also been denied that he is working as dragger on time -rated scale with effect from 11-10-91 . It has been denied that the concerned workman is entitled to be regularised on time- rated job as per provision of Section 7.2 and 7.5 of the Certified Standing Order of the company.

1. By Order No. L -20012/ 41/ 96 - IR ( C- I ) dated 12-3-1997 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

4.Rejoinder has been filed on behalf of the workman stating almost same thing which has been stated in the written statement .

5.Theworkman has produced himselfas WW- 1 who has proved documents as Ext . W- 1 .

"Whether the demand by the Union for regularisation, by the management of Shri Amin Mahato , P. R. Mazdoor in Time Rated Job is legal and justified? If so to what relief is the workman entitled?"

The management has produced MW - 1 - Anthoni Samad , who during his cross - examination proved documents , as Ext . W- 2 and Ext . W- 3 . The management has also produced MW-2-Ved Prakash who has proved document as Ext . W-4 .

6. The argument advanced on behalf ofthe workman isthat the concerned workman has been working in the time-ratedjob and the management has been taking the job ofdragger from the concerned workman and though he 2. The case of the workman is that Amin Mahato , Piece - rated Mazdoor has been working at Bhowra Coke Plant as Dragger since 11-10-1991 continuously which is the job of time- rated . Though the designation of the concerned workman is P. R. Mazdoor , but the management is taking work from him as Dragger in Time-rated job . The concerned workman represented before the management on20-8-92 for his regularisation in Time - ratedjob. But the management did not pay any heed to his representation .

3311 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

was appointed in piece -rated job in the year 1991 , the management has denied regularisation of the concerned workman as Dragger in time -rated job ,

No. I, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Central Mino Planning & Design Institute Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-5-2009:

7. The management argued that the concerned workmanwas piece - rated mazdoor and he cannot be given time-ratedjob as Dragger .

[No. L-20012/ 116/82- D. III (A) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRALGOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. I, DHANBAD .

Inthe matter of a reference U/s . 10 (1 ) (d) ofI.D. Act, 1947 . Reference No. 11 of 1988 .

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd. , Gondwana Place , Ranchi .

AND

TheirWorkmen .

Present: Shri H.M. Singh, Presiding Officer.

APPEARANCES

: None

Forthe Employers

: None.

Forthe Workmen

: Industry : Coal .

State : Jharkhand .

Dated, the 30thApril, 2009 .

AWARD.

But the management's witness MW- 1 stated in cross-examination at page 2 that this is the copy ofa Sunday list from which it appears that as a Dragman he had performed duties on Sunday, marked Ext. W- 2 . This statement of the management shows that the work of dragman is taken from the concerned workman and the management has only stated that it has not taken the work ofdragman from the concerned workman . The Dragman is time- rated worker . There is no dispute in this because MW- 1 stated that sometimes the concerned workman used towork as a Dragman also in time-rated job . Such nature of work used to be taken from him only when necessity used to arise . The pay slips filed show that he was posted as per piece-rated worker though sometime he was taken work of Dragmanwhich is time-rated job . Ext. W- 1 has been received by the management but no action was taken by the management. There is an admission on the part of the management that the work of Dragman has been taken from the concerned workman and the work of Dragman is time-rated job . Ext . W-2 also shows that the work of the concerned workman has been taken by the management as perSunday List on 11-7-91-" A " Shift .

In view of the above discussions , I come to the conclusion that the concerned workman is entitled for regularisation in Time Rated Job w.e.f. 11-10-91.

8. Accordingly, I render following award-

By Order No. L- 20012 ( 116 )/ 82 -D . III (A) dated 16-9-82 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

SCHEDULE

"Whether the management of Central Mine Planning &Design Institute Ltd. , Ranchi are justified:-

(i) In promoting Shri G. D. Laha as Executive Draftsman with effect from the 18th March , 1980;

The demand by the Union for regularisation , by the management, of Shri Amin Mahato P.R. Mazdoor in Time Rate Job is legal and justified. The concerned workman is entitled for regularisation in time - rated job w.e.f. 11-10-91. The management is directed to implement the award within 30days from the date ofpublication ofthe award.

H.M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 13 मई , 2009

(ii) In refusing the pay scale of Rs . 572-1008 to the Drivers who are capable of attending to running repairs ofvehicles and/or those who possess heavy duty licence;

(iii) In promoting/placing Shri T.K. Banerjee, O.E.& M Operator in the scale of Rs . 378-614 with effect from the 17th December , 1979;

(iv) In denying the pay - scale of Rs . 592-992- (NCWA- I ) to the Hindi Translators ;

का.आ. 1663 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. सी. एम.पी. एण्ड डी. आई. लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , संख्या -1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 11/1988 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

(v) In engaging Shri Basudeo Rai , Chairman on the work of record keeper without giving appropriate designation and scale of pay;

(vi) In not regularising Shri Kapil Ram working as Mali ;

[सं. एल-20012/ 116/82 -डी. III ( ए) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी (vii) In not regularising Shri S. K. Paswan as Rigman ; and

NewDelhi, the 13th May, 2009

(viii) In regularising Shri Saharuddin Ahmed as Junior Mechanic with 5 advance increments in technical and supervisory Grade-C in supersession of all other seniors .

S.O.1663 . In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 11/1988) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court,

2061 GI/09-13 3312

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] If not, to what relief are the workmen concerned entitled and from what dates? "

Dated, the 28th April, 2009. AWARD

2. The casewas fixed on 6-2-2009 but none appeared from either side . It appears from the order of Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court passed in CWJC 931/83 (R) the stay order has already been vacated. It appears further that in spite of several notices issued to the sponsoring union nobody has turned up to pursue the matter.

By Order No. L - 20012/479/98 - IR ( C - I ) dated 4-6-1999 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

It seems that neither the workmen nor the union is interested to take up the case further .

In such circumstances I render a 'No Dispute ' Award in the present reference case.

H.M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

"Whether the action of the management of Rajpura OCPunderMugma Area ofE.C.L. regarding dismissal of Smt . Shudhli Bai , Coal Loader of Rajpura Colliery from the services w.e. f. 8-5-88 is justified ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ? " नई दिल्ली , 13 मई , 2009

2. This reference was received in this Tribunal on 15-6-1999. But till 29-10-2008 none appeared on behalf oftheworkman to file written statement on behalf of the workman . In spite of notice being sent by speed post none appeared on behalf of the workman to file written statement . It seems that neither the concerned workman nor the sponsoring union is intrested to contest the case .

3. In such circumstances , I render a 'No Dispute ' Award in the present reference case .

का.आ. 1664 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी.सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , सं. - 1 धनबाद के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 114/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

H.M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer .

[सं. एल-20012/479/98- आई.आर. ( सी -1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

नई दिल्ली, 13 मई , 2009

NewDelhi , the 13th May, 2009

का.आ. 1665 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी.सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , सं. -1 धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 192/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

S.O.1664.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 114/ 1999) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, No. I, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . B. C. C. L. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-5-2009.

[सं. एल-20012/230/99-आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी [No. L- 20012/479/98 - IR (C-I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

New Delhi , the 13th May, 2009

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 1 , DHANBAD .

Inthe matter ofa reference U/ s . 10 ( 1 ) ( d )(2A ) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Reference No. 114 of 1999 .

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Rajpura OCP under Mugma Area ofM / s . ECL

S.O.1665 .-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 192/ 1999) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, No. I, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . B. C. C. Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 13-5-2009.

AND

Their Workmen .

Present : Shri H.M. Singh, Presiding Officer .

[No. L- 20012/230/99 - IR( C - I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

APPEARANCES

None.

FortheEmployers

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. I, DHANBAD For the Workmen

None.

Inthe matter of a reference U/s . 10 ( 1 ) (d)(2A) of 1.D. Act .

State : Jharkhand .

Industry: Coal .

3313

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

NewDelhi, the 13th May, 2009 Reference No. 192 of1999.

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Kusunda Area of M/s . B.C.C. Ltd. AND Their workmen .

Present : Shri H.M Singh, Presiding Officer.

APPEARANCES

None .

S.O.1666 .-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 195/ 1999) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, No. I, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to themanagement of M/s. B. C. C. Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 13-5-2009.

For the Employers

None.

For the workmen

State : Jharkhand.

Industry: Coal.

[No. L-20012/330/99- IR (C- I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer Dated, the 29th April, 2009.

AWARD

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 1, DHANBAD.

inthe matter of a reference U/s . 10 (1 )(d) (2A) of I.D. Act . Reference No. 195 of 1999.

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of GovindpurAreaofM/S . B.C.C. Ltd.

AND

ByOrder No. L- 20012/230/99-(C-I) dated24-11-99the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the followingdispute for adjudication to this Tribunal .

अनुसूची

Theirworkmen . Present : Shri H.M. Singh, Presiding Officer . APPEARANCES

None.

Forthe Employers

None.

Fortheworkmen

Industry: Coal .

State:Jharkhand.

Dated the 29thApril, 2009

क्या बी.सी.सी.एल. , कुसुंदा क्षेत्र द्वारा श्री रामचंद्र मंडल के अनाधिकार अनुपस्थिति के लिए एकतरफा कार्यवाही द्वारा बर्खास्त किया जाना उचित एवं न्यायसंगत है , जबकि उन्हें मानसिक रोग से ग्रस्त होने के कारण सेवा के लिए अयोग्य भी ठहराया गया । यदि नहीं तो कर्मकार किस राहत के पात्र हैं?

AWARD

2. क्यायूनियन की मांग कि कर्मकार के आश्रित को नियुक्ति दीजाए तर्कसंगत है ? यदि हां तो उक्त आश्रित किस राहत के पात्र हैं ?

By Order No. L-20012/330/99-(C-I) dated 26-11-99 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following for adjudication to this Tribunal :

2. 4-3-2009 was fixed for appearance and for filing written statement by the workman . But neither the concerned workman nor his representative was present in spite of notice sent by speed post.

SCHEDULE

3. In view ofsuch circumstances it is presumed that the workman is not interested to contest the case . Since 7-12-99 the workman is not taking any interest to contest the case. It is needless to keep this reference case pending further.

4. Under such circumstances , I render a ' No Dispute ' Award in the present reference case.

H.M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

क्या कर्मकार के दुर्घटनाग्रस्त होने पर 60 % विकलांग एवं धनार्जना के लिए असमर्थ पाए जाने पर भी चिकित्सक द्वारा उन्हें स्थल-कार्य के लिए समर्थ घोषित करभा तथा प्रबंधतंत्र द्वारा उन्हें दूसरा काम देते समय उनका वेतन कम करना उचित एवं न्यायसंगत है । यदि नहीं तो क्या यूनियन की मांग कि कर्मकार को पुनः चिकित्सा बोर्ड भेजा जाए उचित है ? यदि हां तो इस संबंध में क्या निर्देश आवश्यक है?

नई दिल्ली, 13 मई, 2009

2. 5-3-2009 was fixed for appearance and for filing written statement by the workman . But neither the concernedworkman nor his representative was present in spite of notice sent by speed post .

3. In view of such circumstances it is presumed that the workman is not interested to contest the case . Since 7-12-99 the workman is not taking any interest to contest the case. It is needless to keep this reference case pending further.

का.आ. 1666.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी.सी.सी. एल . के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , सं. - 1 धनबाद के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 195/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

4. Under such circumstances , I render a 'No Dispute ' Award in the present reference case.

H.M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer [सं. एल -20012/330/99- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी 3314

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

नई दिल्ली, 13 मई, 2009

का. आ. 1667.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . बी.सी.सी. एल.के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 24/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-5-2009 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -20012/285/1997- आई.आर. ( सी.1 ) ]

स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th May, 2009

S.O.1667 .- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award (Ref. No.24/1998 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. 1 Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . B.C.C.L. Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 13-5-2009.

[No. L-20012/285// 1997- IR (C- 1 ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1 , DHANBAD Inthe matter of a reference U/s . 10(1 )(d)(2A) of I.D. Act. Ref. No. 24 of 1998

Parties: Employers in relation to the management ofKusunda Area No. VI M/ s.B.C.C . Ltd.

AND

Theirworkmen .

Present : Shri M. M. Singh , Presiding Officer.

APPEARANCES

: Shri D. K. Verma , Advocates .

Forthe Employers

Forthe Workmen : Shri C. Prasad , Advocates .

State : Jharkhand

Industry: Coal.

Dated the 30th April , 2009 .

AWARD

By order No. L- 22012 / 285 / 1997 - IR( C - I ) dated 28-5-1998 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, has in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) ofsub -section ( 1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

"Whether the action of the management in not regularising as permanent employees , the services of S/Sh . Raju Mahato and 61 others ( list enclosed) Coal Handling Plant , Dhansar of M/s . BCCL is

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ] justified? Ifnot, to what reliefthe concerned workmen are entitled ? "

Name S/Sh .

Father'sName S/ Sh .

Late Karmu Mahto 1. Raju Mahato

2. Sarweshwar Rawani

Late Chandu Rawani 3. Bhola Mahto

Late Adalal Mahto 4. Praveen Mahto

Late Dukhan Mahto 5. Shakti Chand Mahto

Guru Charan Mahto 6. Bindeshwar Kumhar

Hemlal Kumhar 7. Jai Nath Rawani

Late Rosan Rawani 8. Doman Kumhar

GujaKumhar 9. Haradhan Mahto

Late Ahlad Mahto 10. Narayan Mahto

Teju Mahto 11. Binod Mahto

Kisto Mahto 12. Dharm Dhiwal

Shibu Dhiwal 13. Badal Dhiwar

Mahadeo Dhiwar 14. Madhudhan Mahto

Hemlal Mahto

Kisto Rawani 15. Nepal Rawani

16. Ram Ratan Rawani

ArjunRawani 17. Chhatish Kumhar

Kali Charan Kumhar 18. Bhim Pd . Mahto

Late Bhiku Mahto

Late Bhiku Mahto 19. Bhagirath Pd . Mahto

20. Raghu Mahto

Suraj Narayan Mahto

Mathur Mahto 21. Arjun Mahto

Mithu Rawani 22. Jagnath Rawani

23. Kishore Kr . Rawani

Basdeo Rawani 24. Mithu Mahto

Dugru Mahto 25. Janki Mahto

Akalu Mahto 26. Manki Mahto

Akalu Mahto 27. Girdhari Mahto

LateGopi Mahto 28. Madan Mahto

Late Rupan Mahto 29. Dhannu Mahto

Late Jagan Mahto 30. Niramal Mahto

Late Debu Mahto 31. Chola Ram Mahto

Late Debu Mahto 32. Mantu Rawani

LateMaghlal Rawani 33. Lazi Rawani

Chetu Rawani 34. Santu Gope

Late Moti Lal Gope 35. Kali Rawani

Jagesar Rawani 36. Anil Rawani

GopalRawani 37. Sona Rawani

GopalRawani

Jadu Rawani

38. Gopal Rawani

39. Aadu Rawani

JhagruRawani 40. Khiru Rawani

Kisto Rawani 41. Ghuna Rawani

MahavirRawani 42. Chetu Rawani

Mahavir Rawani 43. Biswanath Rawani

Bhaglu Rawani 3315

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Father'sName S /Sh .

Name S/Sh .

Sona Ram Rawani

44. Jagdish Rawani

Sahdeo Rawani

45. Satnarayan Pd.

Bandhu Rawani

46. Ganesh Rawani

Late Jai Sri Sharma

47. Hari Lal Sharma

LateGanju Rawani

48. Sankar Rawani

Late Doman Rawani

49. Lakhan Rawani

Late Raghu Rawani

50. Nokul Rawani

Bhusan Rawani

51. Mantu Rawani - I

Sankar Rawani

52. Dhiran Rawani

Mangaru Rawani

Uma Shankar Rawani

53.

Late Aklu Mahato

54. Amrit Mahato

Jadgish Rawani

55. Sukdeo Rawani

Sukhalal Pd . Nisad

56. Lalit Kr . Nisad

MurliRoy

57. Kashi Roy

Bhushan Rawani

58. Ghaltu Rawani

Late Shibu Thakur

59. Nakul Thakur

AmritRawani

60. Pran Rawani

the colliery. The contractor has been engaged for transportation of coal which is not ajob of intermittent and casual nature rather it is permanent and parennial nature which have been performed by concerned workmen from 1988 till date. The concerned workmen have completed 190/240 days attendance in each calendar year . The management has violated the provisions of contract Labour (Regularisation and Abolition) Act, 1970 in view of the fact that the concerned workmen have been working as permanent and parennial nature ofjobs . There are catena ofjudgements of Hon'ble High Court/Supreme Court in which under their directions the Co- operative workers were regularised by the management . The management being the principal employer has adopted vindictive attitude towards the concerned workmen by not regularising them . The concerned workmen are deprived of their legal wages under NCWAs . They are being paid meagre accounts of wages in comparison with the regular workers of M/s. BCCL. It has been prayed that the Tribunal may be pleased to pass an award in favour of the concerned workmenby directing the management to regularise them with retrospective effect with back wages .

Shankar Rawani

61. Bablu Rawani

LateBadalRoy

62. Bolai Roy

Total Sixty two workmen.

3.Written statement has been filed on behalf ofthe management stating that the present reference is not legally maintainable and no employer - employee relationship exists between the management and the concerned persons . It has been submitted that a few workmen bearing some names mentioned in the list of 62 workmen had worked as contractor worker under M/s. Chhotanagpur Motor- Paribahan Society Ltd. , in connection with transport contract of the aforesaid society and rest of the persons included in the list are job seekers . It has also been submitted that Chhotanagpur Motor Paribahan Society Ltd. , is a registered co - operative society as per the provisions of BiharCo-operative Societies Act, 1935 and it has a legal entity as per provisions of Section 13 of the aforesaidAct. Afterintroduction of Section 13A by Amendment ActNo. 5of1989, the State Government authorities took initiative in formation and registration of Co - operative Societies and providing contract works available in different industrial establishments situated within Dhanbad District . In this connection, the company also offered contracts on the acceptable terms of different co- operative societies and the present co-operative society was given the contract fortransportation ofcoal by order 14-6-93 from the yard of Dhansar Opencast Project to the Coal Handling Plant. The contract jobs involved loading and unloading of coal by utilising pay- loaders and dumpers or trucks fitted with hydraulic devices for which Rs . 4.05 per tonne was fixed. For the purpose of transportation of coal from the stock yard of the OCP to the Coal Handling Plant, the rate per tonne become variable, Rs . 3.60 being the transportation chargeper tonne for covering a distance upto 1 km . whereas the rate for transportation of coal per tonne from a distance of 7 to 8 km . was Rs . 12.21 . It has been stated that for 2. Written statement has been filed on behalf ofthe concerned workmen stating that the present dispute was sponsored by Jharkhand Colliery Mazdoor Union on behalf ofthe concerned workmen before the A.L.C. (C) Dhanbad. The conciliation proceeding for regularisation of the concerned workmen ended in failure and thereafter the Govt. of India, Ministry ofLabour, has referred the dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal . It has been stated that all theconcerned workmen have been working since 1988 for Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. through Chhotanagpur. Motor Paribahan Samity Ltd. which is licence contractor in BCCL. All the concerned workmen were previously working in AreaNo. 8 and subsequently since March, 1993 they had been working at C.H.P. Dhansar in Kusunda Area. All the concernedworkmen had been performing their duties which is of permanent and perennial nature ofjobs of loading of trucks , picking and segragation of all stones/shale and extraneous materials, breaking ofall over size coal, reloading ofcoal into Railway wagons ; levelling the loaded coal into wagons of Railway, feeding in hopper for crushing the coal into pieces etc. All the works performed by the concerned workmen are supervised by the principal employer and equipments are supplied by them . The management being the principal employer provide pay loaders, tippers , equipments , other tools and materials to the concerned workmen for performing their jobs and even the pay/wages of the workers concerned are paid from counter oftheprincipal employers . The concerned workmen have been working under the direct control and supervision ofthe officials ofthe management, such as, Project Officer, Astt. Manager , Overman and siding supervisory staff of 3316

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

This is the copy of work order relating to the said engagement . Marked Ext . M - 1 . The name of the said Co-operative Society was Chhotanagpur Motor Parivahan Sahayog Samity Ltd. This the copy ofthe Bye - Laws of the said Co-operative Society which had been submitted by the said Society before the management . Marked Ext. M-2 . Transportation of coal does not fall within the prohibited category. The nature of work for which engagement was made stands mentioned in the work order . It is not a fact that the concerned persons of this case were being paid their wages by the management. His also not correct that their works used to be supervised by the authorities ofthe management. The claim ofthe conerned workmen that they should be treated as the workmen of the management is not correct. The said Co - operative Society is a registered one . The demand of the concerned workmen for their employment under the management is not justified . " maintaining proper quality of coal , it was stipulated that in the process of loading, unloading and transportation , the shale and stone intermixed with the coal should be separated and, for that, a separate rate of Rs . 3 /- per tonne was paid to the aforesaid contractor . The job of shale picking in the process of loading , unloading and transportation becomes intrinsic part of the contract job and the contractor was entrusted with such job as per the terms and conditions of agreement. Thus , the contractor was engaged fortransportation of coal and performance of incidental jobs on turn -key basis utilising its own machineries , operators , maintenance staff and shale pickers . It has been submitted that the Central Government has not issued any notification u/s . 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition ) Act , 1970 prohibiting engagement of contract labour on the transportation job or shale picking jobs which becomes incidental and connected with such transportation work . As per provisions ofthe Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, the Tribunal has nojurisdiction to entertain any claim for regularising all workers of contractors engaged on contractjobs on turn- key basis and where the contract is real and genuine and not comouflage . It has been stated that the contract awarded to the cooperative society concerning this case gave specific terms and conditions of the contract and on perusal of the same , it will be cleared that the contract was bona fide and genuine . It has been submitted that the selection and recruitment ofthe workers were made by the contractor and their works were supervised and controlled by the contractor and its supervisors and managers and they were paid by the contractor. The management had no concern in the matter of selection, recruitment, exercising control , deployment of works to them , granting leave or making payment to them etc. It has been stated that the workmen of such contractor connot demand for their absorption under the principal employer by way ofregularisation. So it has been prayed that the Tribunal be graciously pleased to pass the award holding that the concerned persons are not entitled to any relief.

4. Both the parties have filed their respective rejoinders admitting and denying the contents of some of the paragraphs of each other's written statement .

5. The management has produced MW - 1- Barendra Kishore , who has proved documants , Ext . M - 1 and M-2. During cross - examination he has also proved Ext . W- 1 . The concerned workman have produced WW- 1 -Raju Mahato and WW-1- Sarveshwar Rawani .

6. The management's witness MW - 1 stated in examination -in -chief- " Presently I am posted as Personnel Manager at Kusunda Area of BCCL. The concerned workmen of this reference were never employed by the management . During the relevant period a Co- operative Society had been assigned the job of coal transportation.

WW- 1 - Raju Mahato stated in examination - in -chief- "Presently I am working as Shale Picker in Ghanoodih Coal Handling Plant of M/s . BCCL. Earlier to that I was posted at Dhansar Coal Handling Plant in the same capacity. I have been performing the said nature ofjob continuously since 1988. In the present case besides me there are altogether 61 other concerned workmen . I know all of them and I am deposing today on behalf of all of them. Still we all are working as shale pickers . Some are working in Dhansar C.H.P. and some are discharging their duties in the same capacity at Ghanoodih C.H.P. We work continuously and even on holidays we are being engaged in works . We all were appointed in the said job by the officers of the management . We used to be paid our wages on daily wage basis and still the same system is continuing . We have been receiving our wages from the counter of the concerned plant. We have been performing not only shale picking job rather few other miscellaneous jobs also , such as , loading and unloading work, working as tyndal helper , cleaning the railway wagonsetc. Sometimes we used to perform' the job of coal crusher also . Our Union , namely, Jharkhand Colliery Mazdoor Union, had raised the dispute before the management's authority on our behalf and had taken up the matter for our regularisation , but the management had not made any response . Thereafter the said union industrial dispute on our behalf before the A.L.C. (C) . Ourworks were being supervised by the Project Officer , Overman and Site Incharge . Besides us , the same nature ofjob in the Coal Handling Plant are being performed by regular workers of the management as also by the contractor'sworkers . We have never paid our wages as per NCWA . The nature of works being performed by us ispermanent and perennial . Such nature ofjob is being performed on regular basis . Our claim in the instant case is for our regularisation in the services of the management as also for consequential benefits and our this claim is justified." 3317

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

WW-2- Sarveshwar Rawani stated in examination- in-chief- " I wasworking at Dhansar Coal Handling Plant. Inthis casethere are 61 concerned workmen. I know all of them. All ofthem were working in that Coal HandlingPlant. Wewere working in this plant round the year and our attendance was for more than 240 days in a calendar year . Wewere working on coal breaking job and shale picking work. Sometime we used to unload and also do miscellaneous jobs. We were working in permanent and perennial nature ofjobs . We are appointed bymanagement. Ourworkwas being supervised by the Loading Supervisor and Sometimes by higher official of the BCCL. Besides ourselves there were other regular workmen ofM/s . BCCL doing the same nature of job , but we are being paid less wages that the regular workmen of BCCL. I was doing the said work from 1988 to 2002. After 2002 we have been stopped from duty without any notice or compensation . Our demand is for regularisation on re- instatement. "

contractor, Chhotamagpur Motor r'arivahan Sahyog Samity Ltd. Kusunda, and the reasons , it is also mentioned therein that practically the management used to employ the concernedworkmen through the said cooperative to defeat the claim ofthe workmen in future though actually they have been working under the direct control of the management and they have completed more than 190/240 days in theirwork in each calendar year starting from 1988. If the workmen could not have been issued the Identity Cards through the Sahyog Samity, they could not have been allowed to enter into the premises nor they could have established any relation between the management and the concerned workmen. It has further been argued that the management have been getting the works done through (i ) permanant workmen, ( ii ) temporary workmen and ( iii ) contractors ' workers. The concerned workmen raised an industrial dispute before the A.L.C. (C) , Dhanbad under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for conciliation in thematter ofregularisation of the concerned workmen after completion of 190/240 days in each calendar year and the A.L.C. (C) found in course of enquiry that the concerned workmenwere working in Coal Handling Plant, Dhansar of M/s. BCCL and sent failure of conciliation report to the Ministry ofLabour because the management did not agree to regularise the concerned workmen.

7. It has been argued on behalf of the management that the concerned workmen are not their employees, they are employees of the contractor , so they cannot be regularised. In this respect the workmen's representative argued that they are directly workers of the management and they are working since 1988 and they have worked for more than 190/240 days in each calendar year still then they have been stopped from duty by the management.

Themanagement in para 3 of its written statement has admitted that a few workmen bearing some names mentioned in the list of 62 workmen enclosed to the schedule . of reference had worked as contractor workers under M/s. Chhotanagpur Motor Parivahan Society Ltd. andthe rest ofpersons mentioned in the list are job seekers . But the management did not mention the names of contractor workers and job seekers . It has also been stated that the management has pointed out all the concerned workmen as job seekers but could not establish that they are job seekers . Jharkhand Colliery Mazdoor Union is a trade union which cannot enrol the outsiders and the union can enrol members of the workers of organised sectors like BCCL and taking into consideration of averment made by the management establishes the employer - employees relationship in view ofthe facts that the names ofmembers oftrade union is submitted to the management .

It has been argued that all the concerned workmen were appointed and were discharging their duties at Dhansar Coal Handling Plant. All were appointed in the said job by the officers of the management and on daily wage basis and they were receiving the wages from the counter ofthe concerned plant. They were performing not only shale pickingjob rather few other miscellaneous jobs, such as, loading and unloading of coal, working as Tyadal Helper, job ofputting coal in hopper of coal crusher and alsoworks were being supervised by the Project Officer, Overman and Site Incharge . WW- 1 has admitted in his cross-examination that they could not receive identity card During argument it has also been stated by the concerned workmen's representative that the present reference was made the Government of India, Ministry of Labour on a dispute raised by Jharkhand CollieryMazdoor Union and union authorised Sri D.S. Sinha, Advocate to represent the case before the Tribunal . Sri Sinha filed written statement under his own signature which is against the law and procedure for filing written statement of the workmen and the union filed their Addl . written statement on behalf of the workmen through Sri Raju Hari, Asstt. Secretary of the union . The management has also filed rejoinder to the Addl . written statement ofthe workmen. It has been arguedby the representative ofthe workmen that the concerned workmen have been working under BCCL, but neither the identity card nor any appointment letters were issued to them only with a view to deprive them of their legal wages provided by the management to their permanant employees . The management issued to all the concernedworkmen the identity cards for entering into the premises of BCCL through M/ s . Chhotanagpur Motor Parivahan Sahyog Samity Ltd. alongwith the workers of Contractor and due to which the concerned workers were called cooperative workers and the poor local workers could not understand the implication for not regularising the concerned workmen. It has also been argued that very important to submit that in para 5 of the written statement ofthe union it is said that the concerned workmen have been working under the Principal employer through 3318

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] from the management of BCCL. They were being issued identity card in the name of employee by the management through Chhotanagpur Motor Parivahan Sahyog Samity Ltd

nave no concern with the workers of contractor . They used towork as shale-picker on hoppers, loading and unloading etc.which is a different job assigned to the Sahyog Samity Ltd. and nowhere these workers were said to perform the duty of transportation of coal. It has been admitted by MW- 1 that the private contractors were alos engaged by BOCL

MW- 1 has admitted in cross - examination stated against their own Certified Standing Orders stating that " It is not fact that as any Act or Rule or Standing Orders those workmen who have worked continuously on the surface for more than 240 days in one calendar year, are to be regularised in services of the management . " It only shows that the above witness is so much biased that he could say things whereas Certified Standing Orders Clause 7.0 has insisted classification of workmen and clause 7.1 which runs as follows :

Forthe purpose of these Standing Orders , workmen/ employees shall be classified as follows:-

(a) Permanent, (b ) Probationer , ( c) Temporary, (d)Badli, (e) Casual , (f) Apprentices, And Clause 7.2 says-

"A permanent workman " is one who is employed on ajob of permanent nature for a period of at least 6 months or in a permanent post as a probationer . "

And in the same clause 7.5 states as follows :-

"A badli or substitute is one who is employed in the post of a permanent workman or a probationer who is temporarily absent from duties , but he would come tobe a badli on completion of a continuous period of service of one year ( 190 days ) attendance in case of an underground workman and 240 days attendance in the case of any other workmen in the same posts or posts in the same category. "

Management's witness, MW-1- Harendra Kishore , who was Personnel Manager of Kusunda Area of BCCL, has stated that the concerned workmen were never employedby the management . During the relevant period a Cooperative Society had been assigned the job of coal transportation and the work order has been marked as Ext. M- 1. The copy of the bye- law of Chhotanagpur Motor Parivahan Society Ltd. has been marked as Ext .M-2.During cross -examination the management's witness (MW - 1 ) has admitted that he was posted at Kusunda area since 2001 . During the conciliation proceeding he was not posted in the said area. He has stated that the transportation of coal used to be made from the colliery pits ofDhansar Colliery todifferent direction by means ofdumpers , trucks , hydrolic pay loaders . This means of transportation also used to be supplied by the co- operative Society. The work of transportation of coal is being done directly by the management also . The witness has admitted that the Coal Handling Plant of Dhansar is of the management . He has further admitted that the concerned workmen used to perform all the jobs incidental to the work of coal transportation. It shows that the concerned workmen have no any concern with that of Sahyog Samity Ltd. and they wereworkman of the management . It has been submitted that in the schedule of reference there is no mention of engaging the contractor for performing the duty of transportation of coal and it has been mentioned that the action ofthe management in not regualarising as permanent employees , the services of S/Shri Raju Mahato and 61 others ( list enclosed) of Coal Handling Plant, Dhansar of M/s. BCCL Ltd. is justified and no where the reference is of workers ofChhotanagpur Motor Parivahan Sahyog Samity Ltd. But due to supply of identity cards by the management in the name of Chhotanagpur Motor Parivahan Sahyog Samity Ltd. the name of Sahyog Samity Ltd. was mentioned in the written statement otherwise, the management could have suceeded in substantiating their stand that there was no relationship of employer- employees in between the concerned workmen and the management .

The management has not produced any documents relating to the payment ofwages to the concerned workmen by M/ s . Chhotanagpur Motor Parivahan Sahyog Samity Ltd. Ext. M- 1 is a letter of the management addressedto M/s.Chhotanagpur Motor Parivahan Sahyog Samity Ltd.in which rates of works are mentioned Ext. M- 2 is the Bye- laws of Chhotanagpur Motor Parivahan Sahyog Samity Ltd. The existance of working of Sahyog Samity Ltd. has not been denied by the concerned workman and admittedly thejob of transportation of coal were performed by their workers . The concerned workmen were working in Coal Handling Plant of Dhansar and the concerned workmen

It has been argued by the workmen that they are working since 1988 till wrongful termination from their services in the year 2002 without any notice or payment in lieu ofnotice which attracts Sec . 25 -F ofI.D. Act, 1947. The management did not call for any record from the Chhotanagpur Motor Parivahan Sahyog Samity Ltd. nor any evidence adduced from them to prove Ext. M- 1 and Ext. M- 2. Exts . M- 1 and M - 2 do not disclose that the workmen concerned are their workmen . The management has also violated the Sec . 25 -B , sub-sec . (2) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947 which deals with continuous service of 190 days in case of a workman employed below ground in a mine and 240 days in any other case . Ext . W- 1 has been provedby MW- 1 Harendra Kishore . Ext . W- 1 has been written as comments upon the application filed by the workmen through union . It is admitted position of the management that they have engaged contractor for performing the job oftransportation of coal from one place to another with the rates fixed for the work entrusted to the Samity . It has been stated that the Conciliation Officer , A.L.C. (C), Dhanbad after getting the comments from the employer enquired 3319 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13, 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

into the matter and found that the concerned workmen are not the workers of the contractor and the management did not agree to arbitration. Hence , failure ofconciliation report was sent to the Ministry of Labour and thereafter the matter hasbeen referred to this Tribunal . It has been argued that the concerned workmen are not the workers of the contractor which has been confirmed bythe A. L. C. (C) so, this shows the camouflage on the part of the management.

in the same capacity at Ghanoodih Coal Handling Plant . We work continuously and even on holidays we are being engaged inworks . We all were appointed in the said job by theofficers ofthe management. We have been performing not only shale picking job rather few other miscellaneous job also. So, it shows that correctly that they are not the workers ofthe contractor because management's witness has admitted that they have been working under society which is registered under the Registration Act as per page 3 ofevidence of MW- 1 -Harendra Kishore . He has admitted at page 2 that the Coal Handling Plant of Dhansar is of the management, and the concerned workmen said that they are working at Dhansar Coal Handling Plant of the management. It shows that the concerned workmen are working in coal transportation job under the control ofthe management. MW- 1 in cross -examination at page 2 stated that ' I do not know whether the concerned workmen were working as hoppers at Dhansar or not. The concerned workmenused to perform all the jobs incidental to the work ofcoaltransportation. This statement of the management shows that the conerned workmen are performing the job ofnot only coal transportation but also incidental job in CoalHandling Plant of Dhansar. It has been admitted by MW- 1 at page 2 that the work of transportation of coal is beingdonedirectly by the management. It shows thatthey are taking the work from the concerned workmen directly. ByCentral Government, Ministry of Labour , reference has made in this Tribunal for deciding the factor ' whether the actionofthe management in not regularising as permanent employees, the services ofS/Sh. Raju Mahato and 61 others ofCoal Handling Plant, Dhansar ofM/s . BCCL is justified or not' . There is no reference regarding whether the concerned workmen are the employees of the contractor and they should be regularised or not . It shows that it only requires whether they are working with the management directly and they have worked for more than 190/240 days atDhansar Coal Handling Plant of the management . They have also filed the details ofthe employees who are working with the management with photographs and demanded regularisation by the management as per their letter No. Ref. A.6/APM/95 dated 6-10-1995 .

9. In this respect the concerned workmen have referred 1995 SCC(L& S) 1119 in which Hon'ble Supreme Courtdirected for regularisation and absorption subject to certain specific condition for absorption ofworkmen . They also referred (2008) Supreme Court Cases (L&S) 736 in which Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down that respondent daily- wage employees ofthe Cooperative Electric Supply Society praying for regularisation of their services in the state Electricity Board-Electricity Board during take over mentioned that the daily-wage employees of the Society will start working that the Electricity Board in the same manner andposition. Earlier , the Electricity Board had taken decision to regularise the services ofits employees working ondaily-wage basis from before 4-5-1990 on the existing vacant posts . The petitioners also claiming regularisation 8. The learned counsel of the management argued that the concerned workmen cannot be regularised in the services ofM/s . BCCL . The management has referred 2001 Lab. I. C. 3856(SC) between Steel Authority of India Ltd. vs. National Union Water Front workers, therein stated thattheyare contractor's workers and contractor's workers cannot be automatically absorbed by the principal employer . The Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down that a beneficial legislation enacted to give effect to Directive Principles of the State Policy which is otherwise constitutionallyvalid, the consideration ofthe Court cannot be divorced from those objectives . In a case of ambiguity inthe language ofa beneficial labour legislation, the Courts have to resolve the quandary in favour of conferment of, rather than denial of, a benefit on the labour by the Legislature but without rewriting and/or doing violence to theprovisions ofthe enactment. Regardig contract labour thetest is whether they are working under whose authority the establishment is carrying on industry is the real test and not whether the establishment is instrumentality of Govt. underArt. 12 of Constitution. The learned counsel ofthe management also argued that WW- 1 -Raju Mahato incross-examination stated that ' I am not the worker ofthe Society and other concerned workmen are also not the workers ofthe said Samity or Society' . He has denied that 'the said societyhad appointed us . We never worked under any licensed contractor for the performances of the aforesaid job . We have not been issued any pay slip ' . He also argued that WW-2- Sarveshwar Rawani-stated in cross-examination- ' I do not know if the sponsoring union has given inwriting that we were appointed by a licencee contractor. Ifthe sponsoring union had mentioned in the written statement that we are the worker of Chhotanagpur- Motor Parivahan Samity that is incorrect. The above witness has already stated in examination- in-chief that they are working atDhansar Coal Handling Plant i.e. of M/s. BCCL , andthey are working for more than 240 days in a calender year and they performed the work of coal breaking job , shale picking work and sometime also engaged to do miscellaneous jobs i.e. permanent and perennial nature . Ourworkwasbeing supervised by the Loading supervisor and sometime by higher officials of M/ s . BCCL . Besides ourselves there were other regular workers of M/s . BCCL doing the same nature ofjob, but we are being paid less wages than the regular workmen of BCCL. It has also been statedby WW- 1 that we are paid less wages. Still we all are working as shale pickers. Some are working in Dhansar CoalHandling Plant and some are discharging their duties

2061 Gl /09-14 3320

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] on the ground that they were working in the Society from before 4-5-1990 and their services stood transferred to the Electricity Board. Hon'ble Supreme Court held benefit cannot be denied. Regularisation is justified on the basis ofConstitution. More so, when they had put in long period ofservice . Theyhave also referred 1990 F.L.R. (60) page 20 in which Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down Prohibiting employment of contract labour in cleaning, stacking and other allied jobs , except loading and unloading of bricks from wagons and trucks . This exception clause is discriminatory-violates Art . 14-workers doing such job should be treated at par.

However, engagement of labour force through contract to do work of perennial nature is intended to be abolished. Theyalso referred 1962(x) LLJ - 131 (SC) in which Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down - management employing Labour through Mukaddama such Mukaddams deducting their commission from out of the wages payable to the workmen so employed-the direction to the employer that the workmen no employed should be treated as the direct employers and that the mukaddama should be taken over as regular semi - skilled employees of the company . They have also referred 1964( II) LLJ - 633 - D. C. Dewan Mohideen Sahib & Sons& another Vs. United Bidi Workers ' Union . In this case the employers were supplying bidi leaves and tobacco to the contractor and the contractor in turn were supplying the same to the workmen . The workmen were preparing bidi in their respective home and they were depositing the same to the contractor and the contractor in turn depositing the same to the principal employer. In this case the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that they are the employees of the management . The workmen also referred 2002 (2) LLJ 368- Indian Farmers Fertiliser Co - operative Ltd. Vs. Industrial Tribunal - I (Allahabad and Others ) in which Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down -Appellant - employer contending that workmen were not direct employees but contract Labourers Tribunal on appreciation of facts holding that workmen were not contract labourers but were direct employees and should be deemed to be continuing in service . Whether the Tribunal traversed beyond the reference -held, when the appellant had claimed workmen tobe contract workers the nature of their employment had necessarily to be decided -order of Tribunal cannot be seriously assailed . They have also referred SCLJ (Vol . 10) page 21 - Saraspur Mill Co. Ltd. Vs. Ramanlal Chamanlal . In this order canteen was run through Co- operative Society and the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the management is statitorily bound to maintain the canteen and so the employees of the canteen shall be treated as employees of the management .

10.Papers filed on behalf ofthe management that the medical treatment has been granted by the management .mana Asper Ext . W- 1 series the workmen , Lakhan Rawani, Binod Mahato, Janki Mahato and Raju Mahato have been given medical treatment by the management. It shows that they were working with the management, so they have been givenmedical treatment by the management . There is also documents which have been filed by the workmen which show that the work were allotted by the management to the society for doing job of cleaning of stones and doing the work in garden . It shows that those works taken by the management are of parmanent and perennial in nature .

The learned counsel of the workmen referred 1994 LLR page 634- R. K. Panda & Ors . Vs. Steel Authority of India & Ors.- In this case their Lordships held that it need not be pointed out that in all such cases the labourers are initially employed and engaged by the contractors. As such atwhat point of time a direct link is established between the contract labourers and the principal employer , eliminating the contractor from the scene , is a matter which has to be established on material produced before the court. Normally, the Labour Court and Industrial Tribunal under the Industrial Disputes Act, are the competent form to adjudicate such dispute on the basis of oral and documentary evidence . They also referred 1987 Lab. I. C. 619 in which Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down- Employment of catering cleaners by Southern Railway through contractors- Factors of Sec . 10(2) of contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970 is satisfied- Southern Railway restrained from employing contract labour. They have also referred 1999 (2) LLN 612 in which Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down Contract Labour ( Regulation & Abolition) Act is to be so read and interpreted so that social and economic justice may be achieved and the Constitutional directive be given a full play-Act being a beneficent piece of legislation ought to receive the widest possible interpretation . They also laid down that Electricity Board of Haryana in order to keep its plants and station clean and hygenic, awarding the work to a contractor- work not of seasonal nature-Contract itself stipulating number of employees to be engaged for the said work - overall control of working of contract labour including administrative control remaining with the Board -Board neither registered as principal employer nor contractor was licensed contractror-Held. It is clear that there was no contract system with the Board as work was of perennial nature-so -called contract system was only a camouflage- Employer- employee relationship is easily visualised- Employees who have worked for more than 240 days in a year are entitled to be absorbed permanently in the Board. Regard being had to the necessities of situation the Act provides for continuation of contract labour . Initiation of Act is not to abolish contract labour entirely -Act only regulates the working conditions of contract labour when such employment is required in the interest of industry.

11. The management has admitted in its written statement at paras 6 & 7 that some of the workmen have worked in their establishment , but they have not named those workmen . It shows that the management does not want to come with a clean hand . The management's भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

witness, MW- 1 stated that payment is made to the society, but they have not filed any payment- sheet or wage-sheet regarding payment to the society . It only shows that the payment was made to the concerned workmen through society to whom that payment is made at the rute prescribed in Ext . M- 1 . The management's witness stated that the work performed by the concerned workmen are same that of permanent workmen and the permanent employees of the management got more wages than that of these workmen. It shows that they do not want to give full wages to the concerned workmen.

12. Another ground advanced on behalf of the workmen regarding same award has been passed by the Tribunal for regularisation of the workmen in Reference No.40/96 and 46/96- Annexure- 7 with Ext. W- 1 series ,by order dated 23-9-96 .

The management's witness MW - 1 clearly admits that M/s . BCCL, is a public sector undertaking and they have taken from the society which is registered under an Act being promalgated by the Government . He denied that the concernedworkmen are the workmen of the management . It only shows that he does not want to say the truth. But it supports the case of the workmen when the management's witness admitted that they used to perfor all the jobs incidental to coal transportation and loading and unloading. He has stated that the work of transportation of coal is being done directly by the management . It only shows that the work of transportation of coal is done by the management's workmen as well as contract workman.Ext. W- 1 shows that the management has given reply to the A.L.C. (C) in rejoinder that no contract labour is allowed to be engaged by the contractor on loading jobs of coal, Management's witness MW- 1 admitted that incidental work is also done by the concerned workmen . Moreover , Ext . W- 1 at para 4 indicates that picking of shale and stone is awarded to a contractor on turn key basis . It shows that shale picking is also done by the concerned workmen which has been admitted by the management , (Ext . W - 1 ) and also in Ext . W- 1. it has been said by the management thatsome few contract workmen are doing their jobs who are outsider, but not mentioned the name of those workman . Inpara 6 ofExt . W- 1 it is mentioned that the persons casually are demanding that shale pickers should be regularised as shale pickers . It only shows that the concerned workman are working as shale pickers but they do not got wages as per management's shale pickers . At para 6 of Ext . W- 1 the management has admitted that shale picking jobs if intergral part of the contract of transportation and as such the contractor cannot be debarred from engaging any shale picker. Para 8 of Ext. W- 1 shows that the contract work is done by contract workers .

: 13. In view ofthe above facts and law laid down by Hon'ble supreme Court I come to the conclusion that the concernedworkman are entitled for regularisation and they

3321 shouldbe regularisad in General Mazdoor Category - I within six months , Subject to age 2 their medical fitness .

14. Accordingly, the following award is rendered- The action of the management in not regularising as permanent employee , the services of S/Sh . Raju Mahto & 61 others (list enclosed) of Coal Handling Plant, Dhansar ofM/s . BCCL is not justified and hence the concerned are entitled for regularisation as Category - I General Mazdoor . The management is directed to regularise the concer workmenas Category -I General Mazdoor within six months from the date ofpublication ofthe award , subject to medical fitness .

H.M. SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 13 मई, 2009

का.आ. 1668.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी.सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं.- I, धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 122/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-05-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-20012/47/99- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th May, 2009

S.O. 1668. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 122/1999) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court, No. I, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . B.C.C. Ltd. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 13-05-2009.

[No. L-20012/47/99 - IR (C- 1 ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. I , DHANBAD Inthe matter of a reference U/s . 10( 1 ) (d ) (2A) of I.D. Act . Reference No. 122 of 1999

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of GovindpurArea of M/s..B.C.C . Ltd. AND TheirWorkman . Present: Shri H.M. Singh , Presiding Officer APPEARANCES

For the Employers : Shri D.K. Verma, Advocate . For the Workman : Shri S.N. Goswami , Advocate .

State : Jharkhand.

Industry : Coal .

3322

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] Dated the 30th April, 2009

Reference No. 216 of 2001 AWARD

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Bastacola Area of M/ s . B.C.C. Ltd.

AND

Their Workman

Present: Shri H.M. Singh , Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES

ByOrder No.L-20012/47/ 1999- IR(C- I ) dated 4-6-99, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section ( 2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

For the Employers : Shri S.N. Sinha , Advocate. SCHEDULE

For the Workman Shri D. Mukherjee , Advocate .

Jharkhand Industry : Coal State :

Dated the 20th April , 2009

AWARD

"Whether the action of the management of BCCL Govindpur Area in not regularising Shri Ganesh Bhuia as the designation of U.G. Munshi is justified ? Ifnot, what relief the concerned workman is entitled ?"

By Order No. L- 20012/321 /2001 - IR( C - I) uated 24-9-2001 , the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d ) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

2. Shri S.N. Goswami , Advocate , appearing on behalf ofthe concerned workman filed a petition dated 26-3-2009 alongwith copy of office order issued by General Manager (P & IR) , BCCL, Koyla Bhawan, Dhanbad . It appears from the petition that the concerned workman does not want to contest the case further .

3.In view ofsuch circumstances I pass a ' No Dispute' Award in the present reference case .

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 13 मई , 2009

"Whether the demand of Janta Shramik Sangh for employment on compassionate ground ofthe second wife Smt . Barni Devi widow of the Ex - Storekeeper , deceased workman , Late Sharat Chandra Rajwar of Alakdiha Coal Dump , Bastacolla Area of M/ s . B.C.C.L. is legally correct and justified ? Ifnot , what reliefthe concerned worker is entitled ? " का.आ.1669.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी.सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं.- I , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 216/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-05-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-20012/321/2001- आईआर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th May, 2009

S.O.1669 .- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.216/ 2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court, No. I, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation tothe management of M/s . B.C.C. Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-05-2009.

[No. L-20012/321 /2001 - IR (C - I) ]

SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. I, DHANBAD

2. Written statement has been filed by the workman/ union stating Late Sarat Chandra Rajwar was a permanent employee and ex - storekeeper of Alakdiha Coal Dump of M/s. B.C.C. Ltd. and he died on 7-2-93 during the tenure of hisservice. It has been stated that the concerned deceased workman left behind him after his death , his dependent as hissecond wife, Smt . Barni Devi and his other dependents . It has also been stated that after the death of the deceased workman, his second wife Smt . Barni Devi , legally entitled for employment on compassionate ground under the provisions ofpara 9-3-1 of NCWA - V in place of her deceased husband and accordingly submitted application in time which was duly received on 13-12-94 in the office of the management . She also further submitted applications on 6-4-95, 7-4-95 and 31-5-97. Besides this , Smt . Barni Devi had been writing to the management reiterating her demand for her employment on compassionate ground in place of her deceased husband . The widow second wife Smt . Barni Devi of the deceased workman submitted all duly filled in required forms to the management in time for her employment which were duly received in the office ofthe management in time . It has also been stated that Block Development Officer, Jharia, vide his letter No. 1123 dated 30-8-94 sent his enquiry report in proof of genuinity of Smt . Barni Devi and bonafide in her claim for employment in place of her deceased husband to Dump Manager , Alakdiha Coal Dump. It has been stated that in response to letter No. 3056 dated 19 /20-1-95 ofShri R. S. Ram , Personnel Manager ( MP & R) Koyla Bhawan , Headquarters ofBCCL Inthe matter of a reference U/s . 10( 1 ) ( d) (2A) of I.D. Act .

18 3323

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13, 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

In rejoinder, the management has stated that the secondwife ofthe deceased employee is not the dependent ofLate Sharat Chandra Rajwar as per provision of clause 9.3.1 of NCWA - V. In absence of any documentary proof that the deceased employee married Smt. Barni Devi after the death ofhis first wife and in absence of any proofwith the management her case for employment was not considered. It has been submitted and prayed to reject the prayer/claim ofthe union/workman.

4. In rejoinder to the written statement of the management, the workman/union has stated almost same things as have been stated in the written statement.

5. The management has produced MW- 1 - Rakesh Kumar Jha, who has produced Ext . M- 1 . During cross- examination he has proved Ext. W- 1 .

The concerned workman has produced WW- 1 -Barni Devi , in support of her case , WW-2 - Terapada Rajwar has beenproduced in support of the case ofdependent wife of late Sharat Chandra Rajwar .

6. Learned counsel of the workman argued that the concerned lady, Smt. Barni Devi, was the second wife of late Sharat Chandra Rajwar who died in the year 1993 during the tenure of his service and he was permanent employee ofAlakdiha Coal Dump of M/s . BCCL. As per NCWA 9.3.2. and 9.3.3 , the wife is entitled for employment as dependant ifher husband dies during the tenure of his service. He also argued that the first wife of late Sharat Chandra Rajwar namely, Balika Devi died in the year 1968 and thereafter Sharat Chandra Rajwar married Smt . Barni devi in the year 1970. But the management refused to give employment to Barni Devi on the ground that she is second wife . No enquirywas conducted on behalfofthe management . Under the provision of NCWA - V the wife is entitled for employment, but the management violated the settlement .

addressed to the Sr. Personnel Officer, BastacolaArea of BCCL, necesaary papers in proof of the death of the first wife ofthe deceased workman, papers in proof ofmarriage ofthe deceased workman with the second wife Smt. Barni Devi including date ofthe said marriage , papers in proofof nomination ofthe second wife. Smt. Barni Devi in Gratuity Form ' F' and papers in proof of availing of LTC/LLTCby the deceased alongwith his second wife Smt. Barni Devi and others were furnished to Shri R.S. Ram, Personnel Manager (MP& R) , to enable the Koyla Bhawan , Headquarters ofBCCL to process the case for employment of Smt. Barni Devi, widow second wife of the deceased. Butthe application for employment of Smt. Barni Devi on compassionate ground in place of her deceased husband under the provisions of para 9.3.1 of NCWA - V was regretted by the management vide letter dated 10-6-2000 with inordinate delay after submission of her application duly recievedby the management on 13-12-94 . There is no provisions in NCWA - V or in any NCWA to deny employment to second wife in place of deceased husband dyingwhile in employment under the provisions ofNCWA- V or any NCWA in case of non-existence of first wife, the action ofthe management to consider second widow wife of the deceased not entitled for employment is most arbitrary being violative of NCWA - V or any NCWA . Thereafter, an industrial dispute was raised before A.L.C. (C) and the conciliation proceeding was ended in failure and thereafter this reference has been made by the Ministry of Labour to this Tribunal for adjudication. It has been submitted that the action of the management in not giving employment on compassionate ground to the widow second wife Smt . Barni Devi of the deceased late Sarat Chandra Rajwar under the provisions ofNCWA - V is legally incorrect and unjustified. Accordingly, it has been prayed that the Tribunal may be graciously pleased to direct the management to provide employment on compassionate ground to Smt. Barni Devi , widow second wife ofdeceased late Sharat Chandra Rajwar , Ex- storekeeper of Alakdiha CoalDump under Bastacola Area ofM/s . BCCL who died while in service on 7-2-93.

7. Learned counsel of the management argued that she is not entitled for employment because ofthe fact that she (Barni Devi ) is the second wife of late Sharat Chandra Rajwar . But this ground is not applicable on the ground that as per Ext . W- 1 letter has been written by the management Bastacolla Area to the Dy . Personnel Manager (MR& R) , Koyla Bhawan dated 7-8-99 in which the date ofmarriage ofBarni Devi with late Sharat Chandra Rajwar has been mentioned as 15-3-70 Management's witness has stated in cross -examination that he does not know ifthe first wife of Sharat Chandra Rajwar had died in the year 1968. Not only this but in service excerpt of Late Sharat Chandra Rajwar the name of Smt. Barni Devi appears aswife. It shows that she was the wife oflate Sharat Chandra Rajwar, but this also not been considered by the management illegally and arbitrarily. Not only this MW - 1 stated in cross -examination that " I do not know if the concerned workman Sharat Chandra Rajwar had married with Barni Devi after the death of first wife in the year 1970" . He also stated that in the dependent list of concernedworkman the name of Barni Devi finds place . It shows that in the record of the management the name of Smt . Barni Devi finds place as dependent of late Sharat Chandra Rajwar, even then the management has not 3. The management has filed written statement stating that late Sharat Chandra Rajwar was an employee onthe roll ofBastacolla Area who died during his service period in 1993. There is provision to provide employment tosecond wife of the employee in N.C.W.A. As per clause 9.3.1 ofNCWA- V employment would be provided to one dependent of worker who are disabled permanently and also to those who die while in service . However , the case ofSmt . Barni Devi, widow of Late Sharat Chandra Rajwar was referred to Headquarters at Koyla Bhawan , who after examining the case in details , intimated that the demand for employment of such Barni Devi was not justified and accordingly it was regretted by the competent authority at Headquarter vide their letter No. BCCL/PA- VI/ 3 (13 ) /Area IX/ 33 /95 / 9947 dated 16-5-2000 . The decision of the management has also been communicated to Smt . Barni Devi vide Bastacolla Area's letter dated 10-6-2000 . In view ofthe above the concerned lady is not entitled to any relief whatsoever. It has been prayed that the Tribunal be pleased togive the award accordingly.

3324

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009 /JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] provided her employment . Moreover, the management had taken seven years to deny the employment though as per application moved by Smt . Barni Devi , she had filed application in the year 1994 after the death ofher husband. Inthis respect the management's witness stated " I cannot say the reason behind keeping the matter pending for a long time. Upto the year 1999 there was correspondence betweenthe claimant and the management . " This witness also stated in cross-examination-" I do not know if there was any enquiry by the management regarding the death or otherwise of the first wife of Sarat Chandra Rajwar.

employee , as such , is not justified . " The management violating the settlement of NCWA - V rejected the dependent employment only on the ground that Barni Davi is the second wife late Sarat Chandra Rajwar . As per letter by the management of Bastacola Area dated 20-9-96 the photo copy ofmarriage certificate with Sarat Chandra Rajwar has also been given to the Dy . P. M. ( MP & R), Koyla Bhawan , but the management delibarately without considering any reason only rejected on the ground that she is second wife, though original certificate has been given to the management as per Ext . W- 1 and also a number of applications have been moved before the management.

Inthis respect Hon'ble Supreme Court in 2007 ( 115) FLR 427 held " Industrial Disputes Act , 1947-section 18 ( 3) settlement-known as National Coal Wage Agreement (N.C.W.A. ) V-providing for appointment of dependents ofdeceased employees working in coal mines- Appellant , in terms of said settlement applied for appointment on compassionate ground on the death of his father, a coal mine worker - who died in harness -Appellant's application in the first instance turned down on the ground that he was a minor- Held, turning down again of the appellant's application moved after he attained majority, on ground of same being beyond six months , period of limitation -Not legally justified- said period of limitation mentioned in circular dated 12-12-1995 was not statutory. As same was not part of the original judgement and order of the High Court not sastainable - and set aside as such- Respondent directed to offer appointment to the appellant on a suitable post within 8 weeks -Appeal allowed with costs throughout.

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947- Section 18 ( 3 ) -settlement within the meaning of Section 18 ( 3 ) -Binding on both the parties-And continues to remain in force unless the same isaltered, modified or substituted by another settlement . " 8. MW- 1 - Rakesh Kumar Jha stated in cross- examination that " I do not know if Barni Devi alongwith her application had filed death certificate of the first wife of Sarat Chandra Rajwar and marriage certificate of the cliamant with Sarat Chandra Rajwar. The management has not made any enquiry whether late Sarat Chandra Rajwar had any son or daughter from his first wife . In this respect WW-1- Barni Devi -stated in her examination - in - chief- " Sarat Chandra Rajwar , who is now dead, was my husband. He used to work at Alakdin Coal Dump , Bastacola area of M/ s . BCCL. He was employed in the services of the management in the year 1971. My huaband died in the year 1993. He has left behind his six heirs and legal representatives . Besides me there are four sons and one daughter.They are all being looked after by me and they all live with me also. My eldest son is aged about 34 years and he ispresently working as a ' mistry' . After the death ofmy husband I represented before the management for payment of gratuity and P.F. amount of my deceased husband whereafter I was being paid the same . I had also applied for providing one the employment in place of my deceased husband. I was married to my husband in the year 1970. In Ration Card my name figures as the wife of my deceased husband. In the records of the management also my name finds mentioned as his wife. Despite the fact that I am the wife of the deceased I have not been provided with employment as yet by the management and I have been harassed and have suffered on account of that reason . "

Itshows that the settlement which has been entered into between the parties that cannot be ignored by the parties and it has to be respected or observed .

9. In view of the discussions made above , I come to the conclusion that the demand of Smt . Barni Devi for dependent employment with retrospective effect with all arrear ofwages is legal and justified.

10. Accordingly , I render the following award-

Thedemand ofJanta Shramik Sangh for employment on compassionate ground of the second wife , Smt. Barni Devi , widow ofthe Ex- storekeeper deceased workman, Late Sharat Chandra Rajwar of Alakdiha Coal Dump , Bastacolla Area ofM/s . B.C.C.L. is legally correct and justified, Hence , Smt .BarniDevi , widow wife ofdeceased workman , late Sharat Chandra Rajwar, is entitled for employment with effect from January, 1994 with all arrear of wages. The management is directed toprovide employment to Smt . Barni Devi , widow wifeofdeceased workman , late Sharat Chandra Rajwar with effect from January , 1994 with all arrear of wages within 30 days from the date of publication of the award.

WW-2-Tarapada Rajwar - stated in examination - in- chief-" Sarat Chandra Rajwar , ex-employee of Bastacola Area ofM/ s . BCCL was will know to me and he was my neighbour. I knew him since the year 1958. The name ofhis first wife was Balika Devi . She died sometime in the year 1968. As at that time I was out of station I had not attended her funeral ceremony. After the death ofhis first wife Sarat Chandra Rajwar got married for the second time in the year 1970 and the name ofhis second wife was Barni Devi . I was very much present in the said marriage . Sarat Chandra Rajwar was employed soon after the nationalisation of coal Industry i.e. after 1971. Sarat Chandra Rajwar died in the year 1993 leaving behind his second wife , two sons and one daughter from the second marriage and two sons from the first marriage . Sarat Chandra Rajwar died during his period and after his death his second wife submitted an application before the management for providing employment to her on compassionate ground in place of her husband, but no response was made by the management . The action of the management in not providing employment to the dependant of the deceased

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 13 मई , 2009

का. आ. 1670.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी.सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. - 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 75/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-05-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/712/97- आईआर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi, the 13th May, 2009

S.O.1670.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.75/ 1998 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, No. I, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s B.C.C. Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 13-05-2009.

[No. L-20012/712/97 -IR (C - I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. I, DHANBAD Inthe matter of a reference U/s . 10( 1 ) ( d) (2A) of I.D. Act .

Reference No. 75 of 1998

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Jealgora Colliery of M/s . BCCL .

AND

TheirWorkman .

Present : Shri H.M. Singh , Presiding Officer .

APPEARANCES

For the Employers : Shri H. Nath , Advocate .

Forthe Workman : Shri K.N. Singh Advocate .

State Jharkhand. Industry : Coal . :

Dated the April.2009.

AWARD

ByOrder No. L-20012/712 /97 - IR( C- I ) dated 10-9-98 , the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

3325 "Whether the action of the management of Jealgora Colliery of M/ s. BCCL in dismissinsg Sri Bachkan Prasad, Ex-Cap Lamp Clerk from the services ofthe company is legal & justified ? Ifnot , what relief the workman is entitled ?" .

2.Written statement has been filed on behalf of the concerned workman stating therein that the workman was dismissed from the service of the company with effect from 14-10-1986. He was appointed in the year 1980 as son- in - law ofGour Kamin under V.R.S. Scheme (Female) who was an employee of Bhulan Bararee Colliery . After long service the management raised the question that the workman is not son- in - law of Smt . Gouri Kamin and had sought employment fradulently , consequent of which he wascharge- sheeted by the management on 27-2-1986/5-3- 86. The chartge-sheet is evidently vague , unspecified based on false and fabricated report in as much as it does not reveal the precise nature of misconduct alleged against the workman. At the time of providing employment it was givenafter proper identification and verification as far back as about seven years before. The workman submitted his reply to the chargesheet on 17-4-86 . The concerned workmanwas called on different dates in the year 1986 but the enquiry was not conducted as the complainant did not present in the enquiry . As per the provision of the Standing Orders the enquiry should have been conducted ex -parte but itwas not done . In the charge- sheet it was alleged that Bachkan Prasad was not the son- in - law ofSmt. Gouri Kamin . Thereafter industrial dispute was raised and on failure of conciliation proceeding this reference has been made. It has been stated that the action of the management in dismissing the concerned workman from service without supported by valid evidence is not justified. It has been prayed that the Tribunal be pleased to hold that the action ofthe management in dismissing the concerned workman is not justified and further be pleased to pass an award for re - instatement of the workman inservice with full back wages from the date of dismissal .

3. The management has filed written statement stating that the present reference is not maintainable both in law and facts . It has been stated that Bachkan Prasad , Cap- Lamp-Clerk, was working as a Store Clerk in Jealogore Colliery. He entered into employment of the company declaring himselfthe son - in - law of Gouri Kamin , who was never inroll of Bhulan Bararee Colliery. The concerned workman was initially appointed as Miner / Loader under Voluntary Retirement (Female ) Scheme by fraudulent and dishonest manner by concealing the facts about his genuinity . When the matter was brought to the knowledge ofthe management, it was enquired into and it was found thatthe allegation levelled against him was correct . Hewas accordingly charge- sheeted vide chargesheet No. AJ/Charge-Sheet/151-60 dated 27-2-86/9-3-86. After issue ofthe charge-sheet a departmental enquiry was held in which the concerned workman fully participated and full 3326

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] =

opportunity was given to defend his case . The Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry according to the Rules of Natural Justice . The Enquiry Officer found the charges proved and with due approval the concerned workman wasdismissed from service w.e.f. 14-10-86 . It has been stated that the dispute was raised after delay of more than ten years , which makes a stale demand which is not maintainable in view ofthe various decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and High Courts . It has been prayed that an award be passed in favour of the management .

4. Both the parties have filed their respective rejoinders admitting and denying the contentions of some of the paras of each other's written statement .

5. The management has produced MW - 1-Bipin Bihari Rai , who has proved Ext . M - 1 to M-4.

The concerned workman has produced WW -1- Bachkan Prasad and he has proved Exts . W -- 1 to W-7.

6..Regarding fairness of enquiry vide order dated 13-8-2008 the enquiry was held to be not fair and proper.

management of Bhulan Bararee colliery . When this fact was detected the chargesheet was issued against the concerned workman . This is the copy of the said charge- sheet dated 27-2-86/ 5-3-86 , marked Ext . M - 1 . An enquiry wasthereafter conductedby A.K. Srivastava. Dy . Personnel Manager in which the concerned workman fully participated . Upon the completion of enquiry the said Enquiry officer submitted the report after finding the charge established against the concerned workman. On the basis ofthe said report a letter of dismissal was issued . This is the said letter dated 14-10-86 under the signature of P.K. Sinha, the then Agent of the said colliery by which the dismissal of the concerned workman from his service was communicated , marked Ext . M -2 . Sri A.K. Srivastava who had conducted the enquiry is no more . This is the letter dated 3-3-97 submitted before the A.L.C. (C) by which the industrial dispute was raised by the union , marked Ext. M- 3. This is another letter dated 18-8-97 submitted before the ALC (C) by the union . Marked Ext. M -3/ 1 . This letter dated 18-6-97 is under the signature of the then Manager . R.N. Mishra sent to the ALC ( C ) . marked Ext. M -4 . The enquiry proceeding papers have become untracable and so far that reason the same have not been produced in the instant case from the side of the management. " It only shows that theconcerned workman was employed and got employment onthe basis of V.R.S. of Gouri Kamin . He has not examined Gouri Kamin in the enquiry proceeding or in the Court so that Gouri Kamin may state the fact that she was employed and the concerned workman got employment on the basis ofher V.R.S.

9. The management argued that the above dispute has arisen after ten years . The concerned workman was dismissed in the year 1986 and the present case has been referred on 10-9-1998. It shows after about ten years he raised the dispute which only shows that he may be son- in - law , but when Gouri Kamin was not employed, the concerned workman cannot be given employment on the basisofV.R.S. of Gouri Kamin . In the circumstances of the case it shows that a person who got fradulent employment he cannot be remained in the service of the management . The concerned workman in his cross -examination has admitted that he has got no paper to show that Gouri Kaminwas working at Bhulan Bararee colliery.

7. Main argument advanced on behalf of the workman is that he was son- in- law of Smt . Gouri Kamin who has taken V.R.S. Scheme (Female) who was an employee of Bhulan Bararee Colliery. On this ground he was under that scheme appointed as Cap Lamp Clerk with the company and later he was transferred to another colliery. Chargesheet has been issued on the ground of getting fradulent employment dated 27-2-86 /5-3-86 . The enquiry was held not to be fair and proper. The concerned workman has not filed any paper regarding employment of Gouri Kamin on which basis he was employed and given employment by the management as son- in - law of Smt . Gouri Kamin .On the basis of V.R.S. ( Female ) ofGouri Kamin, the concerned workman has taken employment and Gouri Kamin was not at all in the employment . So existing of the concerned workman is not possible when V.R.S. was taken, as per allegation of the concerned workman, by Gouri Kamin and Gouri Kamin was not at all in the employment under the management, so no V.R.S. and employment can be given to the concerned workman on the basis of V.R.S. of Gouri Kamin . In this respect the concerned workman , WW- 1 , stated- in cross -examination that " I have got no paper to show that Gouri Kamin was working at Bhulan Bararee Colliery. "

10. In view the above discussions , I come to the conclusion that since Gouri Kamin was not in the employement of the management the question of V.R.S. by Gouri Kamin does not arise and in that view of the matter the dismissal of the concerned workman is legal and justified.

11. Accordingly, I render the following award-

The action of the management of Jealgora colliery of M/s. BCCL in dismissing Sri Bachkan Prasad, Ex - Cap Lamp Clerk from the services of the company is legal and justified and the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief.

8. Regarding statement of MW- 1 , he has stated in examination - in - chief-" Presently I am posted as Dy . Personnel Manager at Jealgora colliery . On the basis of the documents I know the facts of the present case .The concerned workman had been appointed at Jealgora colllieryinplace ofGouri Kamin who used to work at Bararee colliery, as wagon Loader and retired under V.R.S. Scheme . The employment was offered to the concerned workman as he claimed himself to be son - in - law of the said lady. The said lady. Gouri Kamin was never on the roll of the

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer 3327 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13, 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 13 मई , 2009

का.आ. 1671.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी.सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिकः अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या- I, धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 72/2002) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

Afterhaving received the Order No. L -22012/85/ 2002- IR(C- I) dt. 17-7-2002 the aforesaid reference fromthe Government of India, Minstry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication ofthe dispute a reference case No. 72 of 2002 was registered on 2-8-2002 . On 26-3-2009 Sri S.N. Goswami , Advocateappears and file a letter of authority on behalf of Sponsoring Union as well as withdrawal petition. It appears from the withdrawal petition that workman/ Sponsoring Union does not want to contest the case. becasue management is agree to regularise the concern workman in clerical grade III with pay protection .

[सं. एल-20012/85/2002- आई.आर. ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 13th May, 2009

Inview ofsuch circumstance. I pass a No Dispute Award in present Reference case .

H. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer नईदिल्ली , 13 मई, 2009

S.O. 1671.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 72/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, No- I, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . B.C.C.L. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-5-2009.

[No. L-20012/85/2002-IR (C-I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

का.आ. 1672.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947-(1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. ई सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या -1, धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 193/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/231/1999- आई. आर. ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 1)DHANBAD.

NewDelhi , the 13th May, 2009 Inthe matter of a reference under section 10(1) (d) (2A) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Reference No. 72 OF 2002

Parties:- Employers in relation to the management of GovindpurArea of M/s . B.C.C.L.

And

Theirworkman

Present: Shri Hari Mangal Singh, Presiding officer

S.O. 1672. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 193/1999) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, No- I, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation tothe management of M/ s . E.C.L. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-5-2009.

APPEARANCES

:None

[No. L-20012/231/ 1999 - IR (C- 1 ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer FortheManagement Forthe Union State:- Jharkhand.

Sri S.N. Goswami , Adv . Industry:-Coal

Dated 30-4-2009

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 1) DHANBAD .

AWARD

In the matter of a reference under section 10(1 ) (d) (2A) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 . Reference No. 193 of 1999

Parties:-Employers in relation to the management of Mugma Area of M/ s . E. C. L.

And

By order No. L- 20012/ 85/2002 - IR (C- I) dated 17-7-2002 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has in exercise of the powers confered by clause (d) ofsub-section (1 ) and sub- section (2A) ofSection 10 of theindustrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:-

Theirworkman

Present: Shri Hari Mangal Singh , Presiding officer APPEARANCES

None

For theManagement

For the Union

None

State:- Jharkhand .

" क्या भा. को. को. लिमि. गोविन्दपुर क्षेत्र III के प्रबंधतंत्र द्वारा कर्मकार श्री वसुदेव चसौधी ग्रेड II A दिनांक 7-1-93 से नियमित न किया जाना तथा यथा समय6-1-99 से क्लेरिकल-ग्रेड I में पदोन्नत न किया जाना उचित एंव न्यायसंगत है ? यदि नहीं तो कर्मकार किस राहत के पात्र हैं तथा किस तारीख से ? "

Industry: Coal Dated 20-4-2009 2061 G1/09-15 3328

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009 /JYAISTHA 23. 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] AWARD

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 1 ) DHANBAD.

In the matter of a reference under section 10(1 ) ( d) (2A ) of the Indusitrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Reference No. 36 of2000 By order No. L- 20012/ 231 / 1999 - IR ( C - I ) dated 24-11-1999 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has in exercise of the powers conferred by clause. (d) of sub -section (1 ) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :-

SCHEDULE

Parties:- Employers in relation to the management of GovindpurArea of M/s . B.C.C.L.

And

Their workman

Present: Shri Hari Mangal Singh, Presiding Officer APPEARANCES

क्याई. सी. एल. के मुगमा क्षेत्र के प्रबंधतंत्र द्वारा दिनांक 30-11-95 से श्री श्याम कुमार गौड, अण्डर ग्राउंड लोडर , की सेवाएं समाप्त किया जाना विधिवत् एवं न्यायोचित है ? यदि नही तो कर्मकार किस राहत का पात्र है ?

: None

For the Management

For the Union

None

State:- jharkhand .

Industry: -Coal

Dated 28-4-2009

AWARD

Afterhaving received the Order No. L- 22012 / 231 / 1999 - IR (C -I) dt . 24-11-1999 the aforesaid reference from the Government of India, Ministry of Labour , New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute a reference case No. 193of 1999was registered on 7-12-1999 but till 4-3-2009 no written statement or claim was filed. Ultimately one notice was issued to the Sponsoring union for filing of written statement by speed post but till 4-3-2009 no one appeared nor any steps have been taken by them.

By order No. L-20012 /418/ 1999 - IR (C - I ) dated 20-1-2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) ofsub -section ( 1 ) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :-

In view of such circumstance it seems that the workman or the Union is not interseted to contest their case further.

SCHEDULE

In such circumstance. I pass a NO DISPUTE Award in present Reference case .

H. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

क्या बी. सी.सी. एल. गोविन्दपुर क्षेत्र के प्रबंधतंत्र द्वारा श्री परमानन्द पाण्डेय को उनके कनिष्ठ कर्मकार को स्पेशल ग्रेड दिए जाने कीतारीख अथवा उससे पूर्व स्पेशल ग्रेड न दिया जाना न्यायोचित है यदि नहीं तो कर्मकार किस राहत का पात्र है तथा किस तारीख से ?

नई दिल्ली, 13 मई , 2009

After having received the Order No. L- 22012/418/ 1999 -IR(C - I ) dt . 20-1-2000 the aforesaid reference fromthe Govt . of India, Minstry of Labour , New Delhi for adjudication ofthe dispute a reference case No. 36 of 2000 wasregistered on 27-1-2000 but till 6-3-2009 no written statement or claim was filed . Inspite ofnotice sent by speed post but till6-3-2009 no one appeared nor any steps have been taken by them.

का.आ. 1673.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै . बी.सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय संख्या- I, धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 36/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

In view of such circumstance it seems that the workman or the Union is not interested to contest their case further .

[सं. एल-20012/418/1999- आई.आर. ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

In such circumstances . I pass a NO DISPUTE Award in present Reference case .

New Delhi , the 13th May, 2009

H.M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

नईदिल्ली, 13 मई , 2009

S.O. 1673. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.36/ 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, No- I , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M / s . B.C.C.L. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-9-2009

का. आ.1674.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी.सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , सं. - 1, धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 16/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[No. L-20012/418/ 1999 - IR (C- 1 ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

[सं. एल-20012/239/1999-आईआर( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009 /ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

NewDelhi, the 13th May, 2009

S.O. 1674.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 16/2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court, No. -I , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . B.C.C.L. of India and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on13-5-2009.

[No. L-20012/239/ 1999-IR(C- I ) ]

SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 1 ) , DHANBAD Inthematter ofa reference U/S . 10( 1 ) (d) (2A) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Referene No. 16 of 2000

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of GovindpurArea of M/s . B.C.C.L. And Their workman

Present: Shri H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer APPEARANCES

: None.

For theManagement

For the Union

: None.

State: Jharkhand .

Industry: Coal

Dated, 21st April, 2009 AWARD

3329 अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , सं.- I , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 33/2007) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/33/2007-आईआर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th May, 2009

S.O. 1675.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award (Ref. No.33/2007). of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court, No. - I, Dhanbad now as shown in the Anftexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . B.C.C.L. of India and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on13-5-2009 .

[No. L- 20012/33/2007- IR(C- I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No, 1), DHANBAD Inthe matter of a reference U/S . 10( 1 ) (d) (2A) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Referene No. 33 of 2007

Parties:-Employers in relation to the management of GovindpurArea of M/ s . B.C.C.L. AND

Theirworkman

Present: Shri H. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

APPEARANCES

: None.

FortheEmployer

For the Workman

By Order No. L- 20012/239/ 1999- IR (C-I) dated 20-12-99 the Central Government in the Ministry ofLabour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub-seciton (2A) of Seciton 10 of the IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947, referred the followingdispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :-

"Whether the action of the management of BCCL , Govindpur Area to dismiss Shri Jageshwar Manjhi from service is justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?"

2. The reference was received in this Tribunal on 6-1-2009 but none appeared on behalf ofthe concernedtill 16-1-2009, therefore, a notice by speed post was sent to thesponsoring union to file written statement on behalf of theworkman. Even on 5-3-2009 none appeared on behalf of the workman. It seems that neither the concerned workman nor the sponsoring union is interested to contest the case.

3. In such circumstance , I pass a ' No dispute' Award inpresent reference case.

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 13 मई, 2009

का. आ. 1675.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. बी.सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक State: Jharkhand .

: Shri K.K. Sinha, Advocate Industry: Coal

Dated, 27th April, 2009 AWARD

By Order No. L -20012/33/2007 - IR (C-I ) dated 14/21-6-2007 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) ofsub-section (1 ) and sub-seciton (2A) of Seciton 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal :-

"Whether the action of the management of Bhowra (S)Colliery ofM/s. BCCL in dismissing Shri Indradeo Singh, General Mazdoor from the services of the company w.e.f. 7-2-2005 isjustified and legal ? If not, to what reliefthe concerned workman is entitled?" 2. The reference case was received in this Tribunal on 3-7-2007 . Bur on 6-2-2009 Shri K.K. Sinha, Advocate, alongwith the concerned workman appeared and filed a. petition praying that the case has already been settled with the management so the concerned workman is not interested to contest the case further.

3. In view of the prayer made on behalf of the concerned workman, I pass a ' No Dispute' Award in the present case.

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer...

3330

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] नई दिल्ली , 13 मई, 2009

का.आ. 1676.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. डी.वी.सी. ब्रहमों के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं.- I , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 30/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/41/1998- आईआर( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th May , 2009

S.O. 1676.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 30/2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court, No. - I , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . D.V.C. Bermo and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-5-2009.

[No. L-20012/ 41 /1998-IR(C -1 )] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 1 DHANBAD

Inthe matter ofa reference U/ s . 10( 1) ( d) (2A) of Industrial Disputes Act

Reference No. 30 of 2000

Parties :-Employers in relation to the management of D.V.C. Bermo

And

Theirworkmen

Present : Shri H.M. Singh, Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES

: None .

Forthe Employers

For the Workman

: Shri D.K. Verma , Advocate .

State: Jharkhand .

Industry: Coal

Dated the 21stApril , 2009

AWARD

certificate to record his date ofbirth as 15-1-45 . He was the student of Dhanbad Pran Jiwan Academy and he gave up his study in Class -X as his father expired and there was nobody to support his family . The workman concerned applied for a job in Bermo colliery and he was taken as General Mazdoor there in the year 1963. In the said year 1963 he was taken as a Welder . Later on he was promoted asAsstt . Foreman in the year 1972 and thereafter he was promoted as a General Foreman . He was retired from September , 1998 on the basis that his date of birth is 1-10- 1938 where as his actual date of birth is 15-1-1945 . The concerned workman on checking found that his date of birth has been wrongly recorded as 1-10-1938 without his knowledge and at the later stage . The concerned protested, but he could not get any relief from the management arid thereafter an industrial dispute was raised on behalf of the workman concerned regarding his illegal superannuation/ termination on the basis of his date of birth as 1-10-1938 . However, the Central Government refused to make the reference and communicated the same vide their letter dated 25-1-99 addressed to the Superintendent/Agent , Bermo Mine and Sri Krishna Kumar Singh , Secretary, Damodar Ghati Nigam Worker's Union , who had raised the Industrial Dispute in respect of the workman concerned. The order of the Central Government was challenged before the Hon'ble High Court , Patna , Ranchi Bench , Ranchi , vide CWJC No. 845 of 1999(R) and the Hon'ble Court was pleased to quash the order refusing the reference vide order dated 25-11-98 and directed the Government to pass fresh order to refer the dispute adjudication before the Tribunal and thereafter the present reference has been made. The action ofthe management in superannuating the concerned workman from 1-10-98 on the basis of his date of birth as 1-10-1938 is not justified , whereas his actual date ofbirth is 15-1-1945 . The management of Bermo Colliery of D.V.C. has recorded the date of birth of many workmen in ' B ' Form, which were found. incorrect and later on rectified . But the management refused to rectify the date of birth in case ofthe workman concerned wrongly recorded in Form 'B ' Registar . The action of the management is in violation ofSection 25 - F of I.D. Act, 1947 as he was neither paid one month's notice- pay nor retrenchment compensation and theaction of the management is also against the principles of natural justice . It has been prayed that he may be reinstated with full back wages and other consequential benefits .

By Order No. L - 20012/ 41 / 98 - IR ( C - I ) dated 10-1-2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub -seciton ( 1 ) and sub -seciton (2A) of Seciton 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

"Whether the action of his management of D.V.C. Bermo Colliery in not correcting the date ofbirth of Sh . Phulchand Prasad, General Foreman , as 15-1-1945 instead of 1-10-1938 is correct and justified? If not , towhat reliefthe workman concerned is entitled ?"

3. The management has filed written statement and stated that Phulchand Prasad , Ex - General Foreman Mechanical had joined the service in Bermo Mines of D.V.C. on 1-10-1962 . At the time of his appointment , as per Mines Rule his date of birth has been recorded as 1-10-38 in the Form ' B ' Register which is as an only authentic document and the said entries have been signed by Sri Prasad, who was a literate and responsible person, since his appointment on 1-10-62 he did not raise any objection or made any complaint as regards the entries ofdate ofbirth , whch was done as per his information , knowledge and consent . At the fag end of his service career , just on the verge of his retirement he was ill advised to raise this dispute and to The workman has stated in written statement that he wasworking atBermo Colliery of D.V.C. since 1963 and at the time of appointment he produced the school leaving 3331

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009 /ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

never raised any objection before the management in regard tohis date ofbirth . In the Form ' B ' register as against the relevant entries concerning a particular workman his signature is also being obtained and the concerned workman likewise has also put his signature in the said registerwhich is available there. "

6. The concerned workman has produced himself asWW- 1 Fulchand Prasad who has proved Ext. W- 1 . The concernedworkman also produced WW-2 -A.W. mardy. The concerned workman also produced WW.3- Ρ.Κ. Roychoudhary, who has proved Ext. W-2.

takea chance to manage a few more years ofservice. As per D.V.C. circular the management considers , complaint ifany, has to be raised at least before five years of the date of retirement . The concerned workman did not make any complaint fiveyears before his date ofretirement or earlier, hence no such complaint could be entertained. The concerned workman did not produce any educational certificate like matriculation certificate from the Board orany statutory certificate within 5 years of his joining nor at any time before. He wanted to continue in his service even after the date ofhis retirement, on the basis of a school leaving certificate issued by the Head Master/Principal ofa school, namely, Dhanbad Pranjivan Academy in the year 1997where he alleged to have read from. Class- IV to Class- IX during 1954 to 1959 and it is alleged that he had left the school in 1959. Ifhe had left the school in 1957, the School Leaving Certificate ought to have been obtained in 1959, but he did not obtain any such certificate. On the verge ofhis retirement on25-9-97 he obtained a school leaving certificate i.e. after 38 years of leaving the school , which having no justified reason, is doubtful and such certificate is not binding upon themanagement and it can not over ride the entries made in the Form 'B' Register under the Mines Act and Rules made there under. As per the claim ofthe concerned workman his age was 17 years at the time of his appointment on 1-10-1962 .To overcome this difficulty. He has falsely claimed that he had joined the services in 1963. The management in usual and normal course as per the service rule and procedure has retired the concerned workman from his service on completion of60 years of his age as per date of birth 1-10-1938 as recorded in Form ' B ' Register and other service records. It has been prayed that the referencemay be answered in favour of the management hoding that the management is justified in treating the date ofbirth ofthe concerned workman as 1-10-38 and further the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief.

7. Main argument advanced on behalf of the concerned workman is that he has filed school leaving certificate and his date of brith was 15-1-1945 but management has wrongly entered his date of birth as 1-10-1938. In cross- examination WW- 1 Phulchand Prasad inpage 3 stated-" As per the date ofbirth mentioned inthe school leaving certificate , at the time ofmy appointment my age would have been 17 years. " This statement of the concernedworkman shows that the time of appointment he was 17 years of old which is not possible in Government service because minimum age limit is 18years . It shows that the school leaving certificate is not reliable by his own statement .Moreover, he has admitted in cross -examination atpage2 that the Form 'B ' which was prepared sometime in the year 1963 was prepared in his presence. It shows that Form'B ' register prepared in the year 1963 and he signed it and after so many years he raise the question about genuineness of recording ofdate ofbirth which only shows thathe got fabricated the school leaving certifcate because thiscertificate has been issued on 7-11-2001 and he has left the school on 31-12-1959 . It shows this has been got onlyto provehis case. Ext. W-2 is in complete document and it is blank on over- leaf. Moreover, the original school admission register has not been produced before this Court so that is maybe presumed that 15-1-1945 is his date of birth . only photocopy has been produced.

4. Both the parties have filed their respective rejoinders admitting and denying contents of some ofthe paragraphs ofsuch others ' written statement.

8. MW - 1 B.K. Mishra has stated clearly in his cross- examinationthatthe Form 'B ' Register which he has proved beforethe Court is being maintained in the colliery.

9. The learned counsel of the workman argued that MW- 2 stated as page 2 that Form ' B ' Register is being maintained by Survey Officer .As I joined in the concerned collier in the year 1985 I cannot say whether it is the same registerwhich was maintained in the year 1962. It has got no matter whether Form'B ' Register was prepared in the presence of the witness . Form ' B ' Register is statutory register inwhich every detail of the workman is mentioned including date ofbirth .

10.WW1 has stated in cross-examination that school leaving certificate is printed form and on prescribed format could not be submitted. It only shows that he had not producedschool leaving certificate (Ext. W. 1) at the time ofjoining ofservice and it was obtained in the year 2001 . WW- 1 steted in cross -examination that he had left school in the year 1960, but in the school leaving certificate (Ext. W- 1 ) it shows that he left school on 31-12-1959.

5 Management has examined MW- 1 B.K. Mishra- whohas proved Ext.M- 1 and M -2. and stated in examination in-chief-"presently I am working as officiating Survey Officer in DVC Bermo Mines . At the time of appointment of a workman his detailed particulars , such as, his name , address. date ofbirth etc. are being entered in a register which is beingcalled Form'B' . It is a register which is being maintained under mines Rules . In respect of date of birth of the workman this register is always considered to be an authentic one. In this Form ' B ' register at Sl . no. 77 the name and other necessary particulars of the concerned workmanare mentioned. Relevant portion of the register is marked Ext. M- 1 . As per the entries made in this register thedate ofbirth the concerned workman is 1-10-38 . This is onecirculardated 19-10-93 ofthe management as perwhich withregard to the entries made in the Form ' B ' Register in respect of date of birth any objection can be raised and entertainedwithin five years from the date ofjoining . This isthe copy of the said circular. Marked Ext. M-2. Prior to raising the industrial dispute the concerned workman had 3332

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/JYAISTHA 23, 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Court, No. 1, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-5- 2009.

[No. L-20012/304/95- IR(C-I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 1 AT DHANBAD

Present Shri H.M. Singh , Presiding Officer

Inthematter ofan Industrial Disputes under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.

REFERENCE NO . 19 OF 1997

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of Bhowra Area ofM/ s . BCCL and their workman.

APPERARANCES

Onbehalfofthe workman :Mr. U. P. Sinha, Advocate

Onbehalf of the employers : Mr. U. N. Lal , Advocate

State: Jharkhand

Industry: Coal .

11. The concerned workmen in crose-examination at page -2 " I had come to know about the new Form 'B ' Register in the year 1993 when I was being called upon to put my signature on that and after having come to know about the wrong entries made in the said register , I submitted my objection in writing. Ido not have any paper withme. " Ifhe had made any objection in writting, he must have got paper but he has not filed any document to show thathe made representation to the management regarding correction of his date of birth. WW-2 stated in cross- examination at page 2. " It is true that in the application submitted for seeking appointment all the necessary details are given. It is correct that only upon the appointment necessary particulars ofa workman are entered in Form ' B' Register and it is true that this Form'B ' Register contains the photograph and signature of the concerned workman. It is true that a workman is superannuated on the basis of date ofbirth mentioned in Form 'B' Register at the time of his appointment. It only shows that he was superannuated onthebasis ofdate ofbirth mentioned in Form 'B ' Register which has been signed by him and photograph is also affixed there . He is literate person, so, there is no question that his date of birth 1-10-1938 is wrongly recorded. Moreover, as per Circular (Ext . M-2) which shows that after joining service within five years a workman has to raise objection regarding wrong recording of date of birth, but this has not been done by the concerned workman.

Dated, Dhanbad, the April , 2009

AWARD

12. In view of the discussions made above , I come to the conclusion that the management has retired the concerned workman as per the service rule and procedure on completion of 60 years of his age as per date of birth 1-10-1938 recorded in Form 'B' Register and hence he is not entitled to any relief.

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L -20012/304/95 - IR (C- I) dated, the 3rd January, 1997.

SCHEDULE

13. Accordingly, I render the following award. The action of the management of D.V.C. Bermo Colliery in not correcting the date of birth of Sh . Phulchand Prasad, Gerneral Foreman as 15-1-1945 instead of 1-10-1938 is correct and justified and the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief.

" Whether the action of the management in dismissing Sri Banarasi Ram, Heavy Tyndal Mazdoor from services of the Company isjustified? If not to what reliefthe workman is entitled? "

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 13 मई , 2009

का.आ. 1677- औद्योगिक विवार अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मैं बी. सी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 19/1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/304/95- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लत जवास डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13thMay,2009

S.O. 1677.-In Pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 19/1997 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour

2. In the Written Statement submitted on behalf of the concerned workman it has been stated that the concernedworkman was a permanent employee ofBararee Colliery ofM/ s.BCCL working as Heavy Tyndal Mazdoor being E.B.No.093 . In course ofemployment the management issued a chargesheet to him vide chargesheet dated 16-5-91 levelling certain charges contained therein . The concerned workman replied to the chargesheet denying theallegations levelled against him . The management being not satisfied with the reply submitted by the concerned workman held a domestic enquiry and thereafter dismissed the concerned workman from service considering the enquiryreport and other relevant papers . It has been alleged onbehalfofthe concerned workman that the enquiry was not fairlyand properly held and that the charges contained inthe chargesheet are vague and misleading. It has further been stated that before conducting the domestic enquiry the papers of preliminary enquiry conducted by the management were not handed over to the concerned workman . As a result , the concerned workman was seriously prejudiced and the management violating the 3333

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/म्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

proper enquiry, report and findings ofthe Enquiry Officer, the Disciplinary Authority i.e. the agent/Dy. C.M.E after applying his mind become satisfied with the findings of the E.O. and held the concerned workman guilty of the serious misconduct as aforesaid and finally after obtaining approval fromthe competent authority dismissed him from the service ofthe company with immediate effect vide Ref. No. BC/92/621 dated 8th July, 1992. It has been prayed on behalf of the management to pass an Award holding the dismissal ofthe concerned workman as justified and that theconcerned workman is not entitled to get any relief.

principle ofnatural justice conducted the domestic enquiry which is illegal and unjustified. It has also been submitted on behalf of the concerned workman that the Enquiry Officerhad not allowed the concerned workman to defend his case properly and the Dy. ChiefMiningEngineerwho hasdismissed the concerned workman is not the competent authority to dismiss a workman. Therefore, the dismissal ofthe concerned workman is illegal, inoperative and unjustified. Accordingly it has been prayed on behalf of the concerned workman to pass an Award holding the dismissal of the concerned workman as unjustified and illegal directing the management to reinstate him to his original post with full back wages from the date of his dismissal to the date of reinstatement.

4.Both the sides have filed their respective rejoinder admitting and denying the contents ofsome of the paras ofeach other's written statement.

5. In order to substantiate their case management has produced and examined MW - 1 who has proved documents marked as Ext . M- 1 to M-9 . The concerned workman has not produced any witness , nor he himself adduced any evidence.

6.As to the fairness and propriety of the domestic enquiry it was held by this Tribunal vide it's Order No.36 dated6-6-2006that the domestic enquiry conducted against the concernedworkman was fair, proper and in accordance with the principle of natural justice. Thereafter the case was heard on merit.

3.The case of the management as disclosed in their Written Statement is that the reference as made out is not legally maintainable either in facts or in law . The action of the management of Bararee Colliery of M/s . BCCL in dismissing Sri Banarasi Ram, Heavy Tyndal Mazdoor from services of the company is entirely justified , thoroughly legal and substantially proper , and the concernedworkman is not entitled to get any relief. Further management have submitted that one Banarasi Ram son of Late Lal Kishun Ram ofvillage Madari, P.O. Sarmera, P.S. Shekhpura, Dist . Monghyr was an employee working as WagonLoader ofBararee Colliery prior to 1-6-1972. The saidBanarasi Ram left BCCL without putting in resignation orgiving information to the Management ofBararee Colliery and joined at Tirath Colliery of the Eastern Coalfields Ltd. from 1-6-1972 as Driller from where he was transferredto NorthSearsole Colliery of the said Colliery. In the meantime after one month ofthe Original Banarasi Ram's joining in ECL, one fake Banarasi Ram fraudulently managed to obtain employment in theBararee Colliery on 1-7-1972. On enquiry from the Vigilance Department of the Company it was gathered that the real name parentage and home address ofthe so-calledBanarasi Ram of Barari Colliery came out tobe:

7. In course of hearing Ld. Representative of the workman argued that Mukhiya who has issued the certificatehas not been examined. So report and certificate has no relevancy.It has also been argued that the concerned workman has stated in the domestic enquiry held by the management that he does not belong to that Gram Panchayet but Representative of the management argued that ShriShri Baliram Prasad, Vigilance OfficerOf of the management has been examined before the Tribunal and that he got enquiry proceeding and enquiry report of the domestic enquiry exhibited. Ld. Representative of the workman has argued that he has got no personal knowledge ofthe allegation against the concerned workman.

Ashok Ram@Gandhari Ram, S/o. Late Gariban Ram, of Vill.Manaochaik, P.S. Armera , Dist.Nalanda

8.Ithasbeen further argued on behalf ofthe workman that he has produced report of enquiry from Mukhiya, Voter's list in the domestic enquiry. There is no need on the part ofEnquiry Officer to go and collect report and certificate ofMukhiya himself. There is no need to take those certificates as evidence in the domestic enquiry . Ld. Counsel ofthe workman also argued that regarding voter's list it should not be read as a document because it is not complete document because in some cases name of particular persons living are not recorded due to inadvertance or for so many reasons.

9.Ld. Counsel for the management argued that the concerned workman has not produced any identity card in support ofhis case . It only shows that he has impersonated toBanarasi Ram of Searsole Colliery who had worked earlier at Bararee Colliery. Real Banarasi Ram gave up his job atBararee Colliery and present concerned workman obtainedjob in Bararee Colliery by declaring himself as Banarasi Ram with effect from1-7-72. In this respect Whereas the genuine Banarasi Ram's. father's name was Lal Kishan Ram ofVillage Madari, P.O. Sarmera, P.S. Shekhpura, Dist . Munghyr./Subsequently, a chargesheet was issued to the concerned workman by the competent authority of the management under clauses 26-1-11 , 26-1-12 and 26-1-20 ofthe Certified Standing Order of the company for fraudulently obtaining employment vide chargesheetNo. BBC/91 /CS/85 dated 16-5-91 to whichthe concernedworkman replied on 19-5-91 denying the charges levelled against him . The reply ofthe concernedworkman being not satisfied set up an enquiry against the charges levelled on the concerned workman vide letter No. BBC/ 91/890 dated 14/18-9-91 . The Enquiry Officer observing the principle of natural justice, conducted the enquiry proceeding with all fairness , came to the conclusion that the charges levelled against the concerned workman was fully proved beyond doubt . On the basis of the fair and 3334

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

workman's representative argued that management has not established that real Banarasi Ram had ever worked at Bararee Colliery and there is no oral and documentary evidence. It shows that though management had not produced anydocument the concerned workman claimed himselfto be the employee of Bararee Colliery which he has to prove giving his appointment letter and I.D. card etc.Buthe has not done so . It only shows what when real Banarasi Ramwas transferred to Searsole Colliery and after histransfer and giving up the job the concerned workman obtained employment in the Bararee Colliery on 1-7-1972 . Ld. Representative of the workman also argued that real Banarasi Ram has not been examined by the management before theEnquiry Officer so that it could have shown that hehas everworked in Bararee Colliery before 1-7-72 rather has been working at Searsole Colliery from 1-6-72 as per record producedby the management witness. He argued that similar name and parentage does not make it a case of impersonation by the concerned workman.

10. Ld. Counsel for the workman also argued that when enquiry was held fair and proper even the Tribunal can order for reinstatement of the concerned workman if finding in the domestic enquiry is perverse . In this respect theyhave referred a decision reported in 1984- ( IV) -SCC 635.He has also referred to another decision reported in 2005 ( 105) FLR 790. Ld. Counsel also referred to a decision reported in 1973 -Lab . I.C. II -page 851 regarding power of the Industrial Tribunal and it has been held that even where the dismissal of a workman by an employer on gound of misconduct is preceded by a proper and valid domestic enquiry, Section 11A of the Act now empowers the Labour Court of Tribunal to reappraise the evidence and examine the correctless of the findings thereon . Another argument advanced on behalf of the concerned workman is that the charge-sheet has been issued with contemplation of minor punishment at the explanation was called for within 48 hours as per Standing Order No.27.1 whereas for major penalty explanation has to be called for giving 7 days time as per Standing Order No. 27.2 . He also argued that after conclusion of the enquiry the enquiry report was not supplied to the workman causing serious prejudice to him that he could have submitted before the Punishing Authority that there was no oral or documentary evidence insupport of the chargesheet and finding of the E.O. is perverse and that the E.O. has not discussed and considered the evidence ofthe workman and his cross -examination of the management witness . It has caused serious prejudice to the concerned workman .

10.Documents filed by the management marked as Ext . M- 1 to M- 9 shows that the concerned workman impersonated to Benarasi Ram and obtained employment fraudulently and it has been thoroughly investigated by the management by going to the village of the concerned workman withhis photograph and by taking evidence of Mukhiya and also concerned P.S. employee and also voter's list ofthat village . It only shows that the concerned workman has impersonated Benarasi Ram to get his employment. Ithas also been proved from voter's list and other document that he never resided at the address of real Benarasi Ram at Madari . He was actually Ashok Ram as

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] per Ext. M- 8 . As per Ext.M.8/ 1 real Benarasi Ram is mentioned in the voter's list of village Madari .

In view of the facts , evidence and circumstances discussed above , I find no merit in the case of the concerned workman . Hence , the following Award is rendered:-

" The action of the management in dismissing Sri Benarasi Ram , heavy Tyndal Mazdoor from services of the Company is justified. Consequently, the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief."

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 18 मई , 2009

का.आ. 1678.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत ओवरसिज बैंक लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 105/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [सं. एल -12012/202/1998- आई आर ( बी -1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 18th May, 2009

S.O. 1678.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 105/2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- Cum- Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Bharat OverseasBank Ltd. , and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18-5-2009.

[No. L- 12012/202/ 1998 - IR (B- I), AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT LUCKNOW

PRESENT

N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer I.D. No. 105/2000

Ref. No. L - 12812/202/98- IR(B-I) dated 15-3-1999 BETWEEN

Sh . R.K. Malviya,

Sector-G, LIG-75 , Jankipuram, Sitapur Road, Lucknow (U.P. ) 226001

AND

TheChariman, Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd, Habib Tower, Chennai -600001 3335 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009 /ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

AWARD

Dated: 5-5-2009

thereafter as soon , he started moving forward , he saw Sh . A.C. Bithal coming out of the branch, crying under the wrong perception as if the said act of breaking up of the window-panes being done by the workman when he protested and objected and requested him not to shout at him and upon, Sh . Bithal started using unparliamentary language against him . At about 9.40 A.M. , the workman left the said place of incident ignoring Sh . Bithal, who was still furious against him with some abusive remarks .

1. By order No. L - 12812 /202/98 - IR(B - I) dated: 15-3-1999, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, New Delhi in exercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d)ofsub section ( 1 ) and sub section (2A) ofSection 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) referredthis industrial dispute between Shri R.K. Malviya, Sector G, LIG - 75, Jankipuram Sitapur Road , Lucknow and the Chairman, Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. , Habib Tower, Chennai for adjudication .

2.The reference under adjudication is :

"Whether the action of the management of Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. was justified in discharging the services of Sh . R.K. Malviya Clerk-cum -Cashier w.e.f 19-6-1995 . Ifnot to what relief is workman is entitled to.?"

5. The workman has questioned the fairness ofthe domestic enquiry on several grounds including holding ex-party enquiry against him without giving opportunity for defence & findings are not based on the evidence , which have been mentioned in para 5 to 61 of the statement ofclaim and prayed that alleged charge sheetdt : 5-8-94be declared as bad in law and impugned punishment order dt. 19-6-95 be set aside and direction be given to the opposite party to pay him arrears of full wages from the date of his suspension order.

3. This factual position is almost undisputed that at the time of alleged misconduct by the workman, he was posted at branch office of the Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. asClerk- cum- Cashier . He was placed under suspension bythe Chairman ofthe bank vide order dt . 11-2-94 for alleged misconduct and thereafter a charge sheetdt . 5-8-94 was issued against him and departmental enquiry was initiated against him . The enquiry officer after ex-party enquiry found all charges in the said charge sheet as proved and the disciplinary authority after being issuing a show cause noticedt . 13-4-95 and after providing opportunity of personal hearing , finally imposed punishment of discharge from the services of the bank vide impugned orderdt. 19-6-95 . An appeal was preferred by the workman against the above order but the same was rejected which led the petitioner to raise this industrial dispute before the concerned authority. Failure of conciliation proceeding necessitated the appropriate Government to refer the matter for adjudication before this Tribunal . This is also not disputed that said Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. has been amalgamated in the Indian Overseas Bank on 12-3-2007.

As permanagement version in their written statement, theworkman came to Indra Nagar branch on 5-2-94 at around 9.30 A.M. Sh. Mohd . Bashir Sub- staff sought Manager's permission to go out of the branch to do some personal work ofthe workman . The then Manager Sh. A.C. Bithal refused to grant permission when the said Sh. Mohd. Bashir reportedto theworkman about the Manager refusal to grant permission, theworkman became wild and started shouting in the bank's hall inthe presence ofcustomers and staffmembers . On seeing this, the Manager came out of his cabin and requested him not to create anyproblem in the branch and instructed him to leave the branch premises . The workman went out of the branch andthrew a stone at the Manager's cabin and damaged thewindow-panes ofthe cabin . It is further alleged that when Manager Sh. Bithal came out of the branch, the workman shouted and abused him in unparliamentary and obscene language and he also threatened him with dire consequences incase ofreporting matter to the head office and thereafter he left the premises . It is further stated that at about 4.00 P.M. on the same day the workman came to the branch and handed over a letter to the Manager confirming the above incident expressing regret for his misconduct for the said misbehaviour . However, around 6.00 P.M. he came back to the Manager's cabinand took away his letter forcibly which was lying on the Manager'stable.

7.Inwrittenstatement the allegations ofthe workman regarding unfair enquiry and violation of principle of natural justice in conducting enquiry have been denied and it is alleged that averments made in the statement of claim are false and frivolous therefore , claim be rejected.

8. On the basis of the averments made in statement of claim and written statement following preliminary issues were framed on 10-1-2001 :

1.Whether the domestic enquiry is fair and proper? 2.Whether the domestic enquiry suffers with vice of perversity?

4. As per version of the workman in the averments made in the statement ofclaim, on 5-2-94 about 9.15 A.M. the workman reached at branch office Indra Nagar , Lucknow to seek help from Sh . A.K. Chaturvedi , Clerk (Union leader) in the matter of registration of his house and by that time he had not reached the said office . Sh . Mohd Bashir sub staff of the said branch office told him that he may help him in the said matter . Thereafter , Sh. Mohd. Bashir went inside the Cabin of the Manager of the branch office and when he came back to told the workman that he may not help him in the matter as he would be going to Hazratganj branch , meantime , Sh . Chaturvedi entered the branch and assured the workman tohelp in the said matter thereafter workman left the permises about 9.30 A.M. , but as soon as , he was out of the main gate of the said branch , he heard a noise of breaking up window-panes of Manager's cabin and as a result of the said unexpected event, he could not move ahead and

2061 GI/09-16 3336

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 13 , 2009/JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]

witnesses , against the management . In support of his contention he has relied on Broja Ballav Ghose Vs. Union of India, 1986 Lab . I.C. 1166 & Ganesh Rajan Vs. M/s. Bennett Coleman & Co. Ltd. , 1989 Lab . I.C. 534.

9. The then learned Presiding Officer ofthe Tribunal vide its orderdt. 4-4-2001 found the enquiry unfair and defective and decide the aforesaid issues in favour of the workman and opportunity was given to the opposite party to prove the alleged charges against the workman before the Tribunal .

10. The management has examined Sh. S.K. Gaur the thenAccountant and Sh . T.K. Shridhar the then Trainee Officer in the branch to prove the charges levelled against theworkmanwhereas in rebuttal , the workman has examined himself as witness .

11. The management has also filed following documents in support of its case;

1.Copy ofrecord reports (C-53)

2. Copy of cash memo of snapsdt . 5-2-94 (C-53/2)

3.Photographs (Two) C-53/3 & C-53/4)

12.Heard the arguments advanced by both the sides and perused the written arguments submitted by the workman and scanned the oral and documentray evidence adduced by both the sides .

15. Per contra, the learned representative on behalf of the opposite party has urged that charges levelled against the workman are well proved by evidence of witnesses Sh . S.K. Gaur and Sh T.K. Shridhar which also find corroboration from documentary evidence, copy of register C-53 and photographs showing the broken window panes.Moreover, the workman was posted in other branch and he has admitted that at the time of incident he went to Indra Nagar , branch for his own purpose . He has further argued that workman has admitted in his evidence that he had enmitywith Sh . A.C. Bithal . The version of the workman that Sh . A.C. Bithal , started shouting, is not belivable . If incident did not take place and the workman did nothing then there was no reason to shout and abuse the workman . He has also argued that from the evidence of the workman also it appears that some incident took place on the date and time alleged in the charges . He has further argued that the then manager . Sh . A.C. Bithal , is retired therefore , has not been examined . He has furthermore argued that strict rule of evidence are not applicable in the matter of enquiries.

16. In support of his argument reliance has been placed on following case laws;

1. (2006) 2 SCC 255 TNCS Corpn Ltd. & Others vs. K. Meerabai .

2. ( 2006) 2 SCC 269 LK Verma Vs. HMT Ltd. and another .

3. (2006) 2 SCC 584 South Bengal State Tansport Corpn . Vs. Sapan Kumar Mitra & Others .

13. The workman has contended that the management has not examined the main witness Sh . A.C. Bithal on whose report departmental enquiry was initiated and who is said to be victim of alleged misconduct . The management has not proved the copies of record register dated 5-2-94 ofbranch office of Indra Nagar C -53 . Letterdt . 7-2-94 of Sh . A.C. Bithal , addressed to the Regional Manager & alleged confession letter dt . 5-2-94 said to have been given by the workman and they could not be relied on against the workman . In support of his contention he has place reliance on M/s . Bareilly Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. Vs. AIR 1972 SC 330, 339 and CM Deshmukh Vs. Board ofTrustee,PortofBomaby, 1995 Lab. I.C. Page 1496 (Bom . H.C).

4. (1977) 2 SCC 491 State of Haryana & Another Vs. Rattan Singh.

5.(2005) SCC ( L& S) 407 Divisional Controller , KSRTC (NWKRTC) Vs. A.T. Mane .

6. (2005) SCC ( L& S ) 412 Muriadih Colliery ofBharat Cooking Coal Ltd. Vs. Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union .

14. The workman has also contended that out of listed 9 witnesses , the management has produced only 2 witnesses , and both of them have admitted in cross- examination that they did not go out- side the branch therefore , they have not seen the alleged incident of misconduct said to be occurred outside the branch . Whatever they have deposed is totally based on information given by Sh . A.C. Bithal, therefore, in absence of required testimony ofSh. A.C. Bithal, hearsay evidence ofboth the witnesses can not be relied. In this matter Sh . A.C. Bithal , and Sh . Mohd . Bashir were the material witness as per alleged incident to whom the management unfairly and without assigning any reason withhold. Had the management been fair enough, in producing material witnesses , it could have been well established on their cross-examination that they do not support the charges or charge could be falsified by their evidence obtain on their cross -examination . Denying the said opportunity to the workman is violation of principle of natural justice & adverse inference should be drawn for withholding material

17. Before embarking upon the merit ofthe case on the basis of evidence of both the sides , it would be proper to go through the case laws cited relating to appreciation of the evidence & applicability of the rules of Evidence Actinthematter of enquiries . In AIR 1972 SC 330 Hon'ble Apex Court has observed that though Evidence Act is not applicable to the industrial tribunals that does not mean that where issues are seriously contested and have to be established and proved, the requirements relating to proof canbe dispensed with . In 1995 LAB . I. C. 1496 Hon'ble Bombay H.C. has observed that hearsay or indirect evidence can not take the place of conclusive evidence in the absence of any other substantive evidence . In regard to the charge against the petitioner, the proof of truthfulness of the hearsay evidence cannot be dispensed with in a 3337 भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009 /ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

under Section 11A of the I.D. Act as envisaged in the said case law, the management has succeeded to prove the charges leveled against the workman.

21. Indisputably, the workman was chargesheeted on5-8-94 on the following charges:

ChargeNo.1 : You have damaged the windowpanes ofthe Manager's cabin by throwing a stone , which is agross misconduct as per para No. 19.5 (C) ofthe Bipartite Settlementdt. 19-10-1966.

ChargeNo.2: Your action of shouting the abusing the Manager in unparliamentary and obscence language and threatening him with dire consequences is an act of riotous , disorderly and indecent behaviour, which is a gross misconduct as per para No. 19.5(C) oftheBipartite Settlementdt. 19-10-1966.

domestic enquiry . The basic rule governing domestic enquiry requires that no order entailing penal consequence canbemade on the basis ofex-parte statement ofwitnesses orhearsay evidence. In 2006(2) SCC 584 cited by the learned representative ofthe management Hon'ble Apex Court has observed that strict proof of legal evidence and findings thereon, not necessary. In 1977 (2) SCC 491 Hon'ble Apex Court has held that in a domestic enquiry all the strict and sophisticated rules ofthe Evidence Act may not apply.All materials which are logically probative for a prudent man are permissible, though departmental authorities and Administrative Tribunals must be careful in evaluating such material and should not be glibly swallow what is strictly speaking not relevant under the Evidence Act. The essence ofjudicial approach is objectivity, exclusion ofextraneous materials or considerations , and observance of rules of naturaljustice.

18. Inview ofabove legal position it is not disputed that in domestice enquiry strict rules of Evidece Act are not applicable and strict proof of legal evidence is not required but at the same time it does not mean where issues are seriously contested and have to be established and proved, the requirements relating to proofcan be dispensed 'with. The evidence on record is to be evaluated in the light ofabove legal position.

Charge No.3 : By your action of shouting, using abusive /obscence language against the Manager Sh. A.C. Bithal and behaving in a riotous, disorderly and indecent behaviour, in front of customer, revenue auditors and staff members , you have tarnished the image and reputation of the bank and thereby you have acted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of the Bank which is a gross misconduct as per para No. 19.5 (j ) ofthe Bipartite Settlement dt. 19-10-1966.

22. Now, it is to be seen whether from the oral & documentary evidence adduced by the management, the charges leveled against the workman stand proved.

19. It is pertinent to mention that since the preliminary issues framed in this matter have been decided in favour of the workman and enquiry conducted against the workman has been held as unfair and not proper , there is no need to go into the merit ofthe various grounds taken in the statement of claim in this regard. It is also pertinent to mention that evidence recorded during the domestic enquiryand evidence adduced by both the parties inregard to preliminary issues is not to be considered to prove the charges ofalleged misconduct against the workman in the light of following principle laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court inNeetaKaplish vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and another 1999 SCC (L&S) 302.

" In all cases where enquiry has not been held or the enquiry has been found to be defective labour court/ tribunal can callupon the management or the employer to justify action taken against the workman and to show by fresh evidence that the termination or dismissal order was proper . Ifmanagement does not lead any evidence by availing of this opportunity, it cannot raise any grouse any subsequent stage that it should have been given that opportunity, as the Tribunal, in those circumstances, would be justified in passing an award in favour of the workman . If however, opportunity is availed of and evidence in adduced by the management, validity ofaction taken by it has to be scrutinized and adjudicated on the basis of such fresh evicence ."

23. The management witness Sh . S.K. Gaur and Sh . T.K. Shridhar have stated in their statement on oath that on5-2-94 they were present at the time ofalleged incident in the Indra Nagar, branch ofthe bank. Both the witnesses have stated in their affidavit that at about 9.15 Α.Μ. workman Sh . R.K. Malviya came to Indra Nagar, branch and started talking with Sh. Mohd . Bashir who had entered inthe cabin ofthe Branch Manager for permission to leave branch on account ofsome personal work ofthe workman. Thethen Manager Sh. Bithal refused permission for leaving the branch to Sh . Mohd. Bashir. The workman on coming to know about refusal started shouting and abusing the Manager Sh . Bithal where upon he came out of his cabin and ask to workman to refrains from creating nuisance in the bank hall . Thereafter, the workman went out of the branch and threw a big stone on the window panes ofthe cabinoftheManager and on being asked by the Manager, the workman started abusing him . They have also stated that thereafterBranch Manager was also threatened that if matter is reportedto the HeadOffice, the workman will take out his eyes. Subsequent to this incident Branch Manager Shri Bithal recorded the incident in the record register which has been signed by both ofthem and others such as Sh . A.K. Srivastava, Sh. P.K. Sharma, Sh . B.P. Misra and Sh.AjayYadav.

24. In rebuttal , the workman has stated that his postingwas at Hazratganj main branch. He has admitted 20. In the light of the above legal proposition the management was to adduce fresh evidence to prove the alleged misconduct against the workman. Now it is to be considered as to whether on the basis ofmaterial on record 3338

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13, 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

with held. There is no reason why an adverse inference should not be drawn against the management that had the management examined Sh . Bithal , Manager, before the Tribunal his evidence would have perhaps not established that window panes was actually damaged by the workman .

4 that on 5-2-94 he went to Indra Nagar branch at 9.15 A.M. to meet. Sh . A.K. Chatuervedi , Union Leader regarding registry of his house but he was not there. In his examination- in-chief the workman has reiterated his averments made in the statement of claim regarding alleged incident. He has denied all the alleged charges against him. He has also denied the allegations that he gave any letter to the manager , which was later on forcibly snatchedby him . In cross -examination , he has stated that since his posting at Gorakhpur , Sh. A.C. Bithal has enmity with him but admitted that said fact is not mentioned in his reply to the charge sheet . He has also denied this fact that Sh . Mohd. Bashir sought permission from the Manager regarding his work. He has also stated that as per his knowledge . Sh Bithal has left the services of Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. He has denied his signature on the photo copy of alleged letter dated 5-2-94 written to the Manager of the Branch for regret (document no.6/2).

25. ChargeNo. 1

28. The learned representative on behalf of the management has contended that from circumstantial evidence and admitted facts by the workman , it is evident thatalleged incident has occurred. It is admitted case of the workman that his posting was at Hazratganj branch , Lucknow and on the date and time of alleged incident , he waspresent in the Indra Nagar , branch and he went there for his personal work . Photographs produced by the management side show that window panes of the cabin of the Branch Manager were found broken . Above circumstantial evidence corroborates the management's version for alleged misconduct . Moreover , the workman himself has regretted in writing for the alleged misconduct . In this regard he has place reliance on ( 2006)2 SCC 269 & (2005)2 (L& S ) SCC 407 .

In charge no . 1 it was to be proved by the management that the workman had demaged the window panes of the Manager's cabin by throwing a stone . To prove the said charge, the management has examined witnesses Sh . S.K. Gaur & Sh T.K. Shridhar and in support of their oral evidence produced a photo copy of the Bill of snaps (C -53/ 2) & two photographs (C - 53/3 & C - 53 /4 ) . As per management version when the Manager Sh . Bithal came out of his cabin and requested the workman not to create any problem in the branch & instructed him to leave the banks premises, the workman went out of the branch & threw a stone at Manager's cabin & damaged the window panes of the cabin. Thus it is admitted case of the management that incident of alleged stone throwing took place outside the branch . The witnesses Sh . S.K. Gaur & Sh T.K. Shridhar have been produced as eye witnesses of the said incident but both of them have stated in their crossexamination that only manager Sh . Bithal went outside the branch . Sh . S.K. Gaur has stated that he came to know about the said incident from Sh. Bithal, Manager . similarly Sh . T.K. Shridhar has also stated that he himself did not go outside the branch at the time of incident . It is evident from their above statements in cross examination that their evidence is only hearsay & they did not see the workman throwing stone on Manager's cabin .

26.As regard photocopy of bill of the snaps & two photographs is concerned, they have not been proved by examining the photographer . Even, ifwindow panes of the cabin of the Manager were found broken up as shown in the said photograph, in absence of any direct evidence , no inference can be drawn that window panes were broken by theworkman.

29. I have given my thoughtful consideration on the above contention & cited case laws . In (2006)2 SCC 269 besides admission of abusing an officer in filthy language for the delinquent employee , witnesses were examined for proving charges and on facts of the case Hon'ble Apex court has observed that things admitted not to be proved. But in instant case, the workman has not admitted the alleged misconduct . The alleged regret letter said to be given by the workman is not on the record and as per version of the management after submitting the alleged regret letter subsequently the same was forcibly taken away by the workman from Branch Manager Sh . Bithal. But as stated earlier Sh. Bithal has not examined by the management . The other witnesses have not stated anything about such letter ofregret . The workman has denied his signature during the cross examination on the document no.6/2 said to be the copy ofthe alleged letter of regret. This legal position is not disputed that fact admitted are not required to be proved butin present case the management has fail to establish that the workman ever admitted alleged misconduct . In (2005)2 SCC (L& S) 407 the Bus Conductor to be in possession of sum over and above amount equivalent to tickets issued by him and in excess of sum that bus conductor were permittedto carry besides this there was other material to establish misconduct therefore , in such circumstances Hon'ble apex court has observed that doctrine of Res ipsa loquitr (that the facts speak for themselves ) is applicable on the facts of the case but in instant case facts are different . Merely , on the basisofpresence of the workman in the branch on the date and time of alleged incident and photographs showing broken window panes, it can not be said that facts speak themselves thatwindow panes were broken by the workman . Therefore , contentions of the learned representative on behalf of the management are deviod of any force and not tenable .

27. The workman has categorically denied the alleged charge no.1 . In view of his defence , it was imperative on the part of the management to have examine the Manager Sh . Bithal. He would have been the best person to depose as to who actually damaged the window panes ofhis cabin . It has not been explained why Sh . Bithal evidence was

30. Hence , in view of above discussions , it is difficult to conclude that the management proved the charge of misconduct alleged in charge No.1 .

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009 /ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

ChargeNo. 2

31. In charge no. 2 the charge against the workman is that he shouted and abused to the branch manager Sh. Bithal inunparlimantary & obscene language & threaten him ofdire consequences . In this regard the management has examined Sh . Gaur & Sh. Shridhar witnesses and produced photo copy of the record register (C- 53 ).

32. Sh . Gaur & Sh . Shridhar have been produced as eye witnesses of the incident and they have also signed the record ofregister (C-53 ) wherein the alleged incident of misconduct was subsequently said to be recorded by the Branch Manager Sh . Bithal on the same day i.e. 5-2-94. Both the above witnesses have deposed in their affidavit that the filthy abuses mentioned in their affidavit were given by the workman but during cross examination when confronted with the copy of the record of register (C-53 ) they have admitted that said filthy abuses have not been mentioned in the above register . Sh S.K. Gaur has stated thatmentioning of said abuses might have been omitted inhaste.

33. It is admitted case of the management in charge sheet itself that said incident of alleged filthy abuses & threatening of dire consequenses occurred outside the branch whereas contrary to above version of the management , Sh . S.K. Gaur witness has stated in his cross examination that alleged threat for dire consequences was given by the workman in the hall situated inside,the branch. He has also stated that he did not go outside the branch at the time of alleged misconduct therefore , his testimony is not credible , Second witness Sh . T.K. Shridhar the then trainee officer in the branch , has also admitted in his cross examination that he has not witness the incident which took place outside the branch . Thus in the evidence ofmanagement witnesses & facts mentioned in the charge sheet there is inconsistencies & material contradictions on the point ofplace of alleged incident.

34. The management has produced a photo copy of register of record (C-53 ) . The original register of record (C-53) has not been produced . The workman has denied the alleged misconduct. He has also denied that any letter ofregret was ever given by him to the said branch manager . There is no oral evidence on this point that any letter of regret was given by the workman, which allegedly he took away forcibly from the branch manager. In this regard mere pleadings are no substitute of proof. In such circumstances , the real witness who could have proved alleged misconduct was branch manager himself. Though this fact has come on record that he is not in service but it is not the case of the management that said witness was not traceable . It reveal from the proceedings of the case that despite request of the workman , the management has not produced the said witness for reason best known to it. Had the management being fair enough to examine him in support of alleged misconduct against him , it could have been

3339 established in cross examination that charge is fabricated by the evidence obtained in cross examination from him. Examination ofthe Branch Manager Sh. Bithal would have revealed whether the complaint made by him in the register ofrecord (C- 53 ) was correct or not & to establish that he was the best person to speak to its veracity . In 1956 Lab . I.C. 1166 , Hon'ble Calcutta High Court has observed that there was a fundamental breach of principle of natural justice when real witness who could have either proved or disproved the charge were held back from the enquiry though proposed to be examined and the Vigilance Inspector wasmade & lead evidence not on his own but on his information alleged to have been derived from those persons . This is a clear case of branch of the said principle because had the prosecution being fair enough to examine those witnesses it could have been well established in cross examination that either they do not support charge or the charge is falsified by the evidence obtained in cross examination from those witnesses . In 2000 SCC (L& S ) 85 a police constable charged of having abused his colleague while he was under the influence of liquor. However , neither complainant nor the other employee who accompained the applicant to hospital for medical examination were examined . In such circumstances Hon'ble apex Court has observed as under: -

" the sole ground urged is as to the non - observance ofthe principles of natural justice in not examining the complainant, Sh. Virender Singh and witness Jagdish Ram . The Tribunal as well as the High Court have brushed aside the grievance made by the appellant that the non - examination of those two persons has prejudiced his case . Examination ofthese two witnesses would have revealed as to whether thecomplaint made by Virender Singh was correct or not and to establish that he was the best person to speak to its veracity . So also Jadgish Ram who accompanied the appellant to the hospital for medical examination , would have been an important witness to prove the state or the condition of the appellant . We do not think the Tribunal and the High Court were justified in thinking that non -examination of these two persons could not be material . In these circumstances , were ofthe view that the High Court and the Tribunal erred in not attaching importance to this contention of the appellant. "

In the light of the above observations withholding material witness Sh . A. C. Bithal , Branch Manager is fatal for the management and it has caused prejudice to the workman and adverse inference could be drawn against the management for withholding material witness who was complaint and said to be the victim of alleged misconduct.

Charge No. 3

35. In view of the aforesaid discussions , the management has also failed to prove charge No. 2 against the workman . As regards charge No. 3 the allegation of 3340

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 19 मई , 2009

misconduct in charge No. 3 and charge No. 2 are similar except that in charge No. 3. It is also mentioned that since incident alleged in charge No. 2 occured infront of the customers , auditors and staff members , the workman has tarnished the image of the bank . Since the charge No. 2 is not proved, therefore , on the basis ofthe findings of charge No. 2, charge No. 3 also stands not proved .

का.आ. 1679.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं एस.ई.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/एलसी/आर/ 123/96 को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/387/ 1995- आईआर( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 19th May, 2009 36. Since the management has failed to prove all the 3 charges levelled against the workman for his alleged misconduct, resultantly, the workman deserves to be exonerated from all the charges and action of the management discharging the workman from his service w.e.f. 19-5-95 can not said to be justified. Thus , the workman isentitled for reinstatement in service.

S.O. 1679. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.CGIT/ LC/ R/ 123 / 96 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SECL and their workmen, whichwas received by the Central Government on 19-5- 2009.

[No. L -22012/387/1995 - IR (C- II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer 37. In regard to back wages it is pertinent to mention thatworkman was discharged from service in the year 1995 and reference has been made in the year 1999. The reference under adjudication is pending for last 10 years and it reveals from the perusal of the order sheets of the proceedings of the case that the workman had moved number of applications time and again including two applications for transferring the present reference to some other Tribunal . It also reveal from the perusal of various order sheets of the proceedings of the case particularly dated 22-6-04, 21-7-04, 20-3-06 and 15-5-08 that the workman himself has lingeron the proceedings unnecessarily.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/ 123/96

...Workman /Union

Presiding Officer : Shri Mohd , Shakir Hasan The Secretary, M. P. Koyla Mazdoor Sabha, Churcha Branch , Post Churcha Colliery, Distt. Surguja (MP)

Versus

38. The initial burdan to prove that after discharging him from service, the workman did not remain in gainful employment was on the workman . In this regard workman has stated on oath that he is handicapped and his wife had cancer and she ultimately died during this period and he hasremained out ofjob . He has also stated that his relatives have been helping him and he did not remain in gainful employment . In rebuttal , there is no evidence of the management . Admittedly , the workman was initially appointed as Peon in the year 1980 and promoted as Clerk- cum-Cashier in the year 1990. Keeping in view the considerable period of services rendered by the workman and his age, having regard to entire facts and circumstances of the case the interest of justice would subserved by awarding 50% back wages only.

The Sub Area Manager , ChurchaWest Colliery, Post Churcha Colliery . Distt. Surguja (MP)

....Management

AWARD

Passed on this 12th day of May , 2009 .

39. Accordingly, the reference is adjudicated in favour of the workman to this extent he is entitled for reinstatement with 50% back wages , the payment shall be made within 8 weeks from the date of publication of the award failing which it shall carry interest @ 8% p.a.

40. Award as above .

N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer

1. The Government of India, Ministry ofLabour vide itsNotification No. L- 22012(387) /95 - IR (C - II ) dated 2-5-96 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

Lucknow 5-5-2009.

"Whether the action of the Sub Area Manager , Churcha West Colliery of Baikunthpur Area of SECL 3341 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13, 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

in not promoting Sh . Ajay Kumar Guha, Cat . I Mazdoor to the post of Clerk Gr. III which he is already performing since 4-10-89 and superseding him by promoting his juniors is legal andjustified? If not, what reliefthe workman is entitled to?"

5.Now let us examine the evidence adduced by the management as to whether the management was justified in not promoting Shri Ajay Kumar Guha, Cat- I Mazdoor to the post ofclerk Grade- III as has been claimed by him . The management has adduced oral as well as documentary evidence in the case . MW- 1 Govind Kumar Srivastava is Dy. C. P. M. in Churcha Colliery. He has supported the case of the management . He has stated the terms and conditions of the employment of the employers are governed by various settlements which is known as National Coal Wage Agreement . It also deals promotional channel of all cadre including Ministerial staffs .

2. In this case , the Union appeared on 25-6-2001 and 29-8-2003 but the statement of claim was not filed. Subsequently workman/Union absented. Thereafter the notice was issued through Registered post with AD but even thenworkman did not appear in spite ofreceipt ofthe notice . Lastly the proceeding was started ex parte against the workman on 23-5-2006 .

3. The management appeared in the case and filed Written Statement . The case ofthe management in short is that South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. is a company registered under the Companies Act having its registered office at Bilaspur . It is stated that the terms and conditions of the employment of the employees working in the coal industry are governed by various settlements which contain the Cadre Scheme . It is stated that the employee cannot claim promotion as a matter of right rather promotion is given subject to administrative necessity , availability of sanctioned post , eligibility of the workman concerned, recommendation of Departmental Promotion Committee and other criteria such as minimum educational qualification, three years service in the company and after success in selection/test .

6. He has further stated that Shri Ajay Kumar Guha was initially appointed as General Mazdoor Cat - I . The copyof the appointment letter of Shri Ajay Kumar Guha is filed bythe management which is marked as Exhibit M - 1 . The appointment letter shows that he was appointed on 2-4-87 as General Mazdoor, Cat- I . He has stated that Shri Guha was promoted as Clerk Grade No. III vide office order No. GM/BKP/PM/ 30 - A/92/9077-83 dated 29/30-4-92 but immediately representation was received by the management for promotion to other similarly situated employees working in Generał Mazdoor Category tothepost ofClerk Gr. -III . He has stated that on receiving instruction from General Manager , Shri Guha's promotion was cancelled vide order No. 9048-90 dated 30-4-92 . The Management has filed cancellation order which is marked as Exhibit M -2 . The said document shows that the said. order was terminated and cancelled in view of the instruction of the General Manager for its review and amendments on merit amd demerits . This shows that his appointment was not made according to the National Coal WageAgreement as has been stated by the witness and his appointment was needed to be reviewed. This document supports the case of the management . The management has also filed photocopy of service book of Shri Guha which is marked as Exhibit M - 3 . The service book shows that subsequently Shri Guha was promoted as Clerk Gr . No: III vide-order dated 850 dated 17-6-98/ 30-6-98. It appears that the matter was reviewed and considered and due promotion was given in due time .

7. Considering the entire evidence on record, I find that the action of the Sub Area Manager, Churcha West Colliery ofBaikunthpur Area of SECL was justified in not promoting Sh. Ajay Kumar Guha , Cat . I Mazdoor to the post ofClerk Gr. III . Accordingly the award is passed ex parte in favour ofthe Sub Area Manager, Churcha Colliery, Baikunthpur Area and against the workman without costs.

8. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment asper rules.

MOHD . SHAKIR HASAN, Presiding Officer 4. The further case is that the workman Shri Ajay Kumar Guha was initially appointed as General Mazdoor Cat- I . It is stated that qualified General Mazdoors are granted opportunity to learn the work of clerk with a view to build up their carrier. In this case, the opportunity was also granted to this workman to do the job of Clerk for few days . The workman Shri Ajay Kumar Guha was promoted as Clerk Gr . III vide order No. GM/BKP /PM/ 30-A/92/9077-83 dated 29/30-4-92 without adopting the procedure of promotion . As such immediately representation was received by the management alleging that similarly situated employees working in General Mazdoor Category should also be given the post ofClerk Gr. III . On such representation, the General Manager issued instruction to cancel the order . Accordingly, order No. 9048-90 dated 30-4-92 was passed and cancelled the promotion of the said workman for its review and amendment on merit . The claim of the workman was based on the ground that he was being permitted to work as a Clerk for few months but that was not the cadre scheme applicable to the management company for promotion to the post of clerk Grade- III . On these grounds , it is submitted that the award be passed that the action of Sub-Area Manager , Churcha Colliery of Baikunthpur in not promoting Shri Ajay Kumar Guha to the post of Clerk Grade- III since 4-10-89 is legal , proper andjustified.

3342

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009 / JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] नई दिल्ली, 20 मई , 2009

For the Respondent: M/s. P. Nageswar Sree ,

K. Raghuram Reddy &

Ch . Venkata Raju, Advocates .

AWARD

का.आ. 1680. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं इण्डियन इम्युनोलोजिकल लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 128/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L -42012/ 168/2003 - IR (CM - II ) dated 19-7-2004 referred the following dispute under section 10( 1 ) ( d ) of the I.D. Act , 1947for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of Indian Immunological Limited and their workman. The reference is ,-

[सं. एल-42012/ 168/2003- आई आर ( सीएम -11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

SCHEDULE

New Delhi , the 20th May, 2009

"Whether the action of the management of Indian Immunological Limited, Gachibowli in terminatingthe services of Sh . E. Malla Reddy. Supervisor is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the employee is entitled? "

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.L No. 128/2004 and notices issued to the parties .

S.O. 1680.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 128/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum -Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in Industrial Dispute between the management of Indian Immunological Limited, and their workmen , receivedby the Central Government on 20-5-2009. the

[No. L-42012/ 168 /2003 - IR ( CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

2. Petitioner filed his claim statement stating that he was appointed as technician (mechanic) in the year 1983 and he worked continuously. It is further submitted that the Petitioner used to represent his co -employees as General Secretary of the union from 1990 to 2001. It is submitted that he was issued with charge sheet dated 1-10-2001 and later placed under suspension on 5-10-2001. Anenquiry was conducted and he was dismissed from the services vide orders dated 8-6-2002 which is illegal and in violationofprinciples of natural justice . He prays to direct the Respondent to reinstate the Petitioner with all consequential benefits .

PRESENT

Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer.

Dated the 4th day of February , 2009

Industrial Dispute No. 128/2004

BETWEEN

Sri E.Malla Reddy,

3. Counter was filed by the Respondent . It is submitted that the Petitioner was employed as supervisor . He is not a workman. It is further submitted that he was issued with a charge sheet dated 1-10-2001 and enquiry was conducted. It is further submitted that show cause notice was issued to Petitioner , Petitioner submitted his explanation dated 21-5-2002 . It is submitted that after considering all the circumstances , the Petitioner was dismissed vide letter dated 8-2-2002 . Hence the petition be dismissed.

Petitioner

H.No. 2-63 , IndiraNagar , Gachibowli , Ranga Reddy Distt . , Hyderabad-500 0323

AND

The Executive Director , Indian Immunological Limited, Gachibowli , Ranga Reddy Distt . , Hyderabad-500 0323

....Respondent

4. Parties were asked to produce their respective evidences . On 4-2-2009 also Petitioner neither present nor filed evidence affidavit while Respondent's counsel is present . Petitioner has not filed his evidence and he is not attending to his case for several dates as such , Petitioner's evidence is closed . Hence , a Nil Award is passed in absence ofevidence . Transmit .

APPEARANCES

For the Petitioner :

Sri N. Vinesh Raj , Advocate

Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

3343 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13, 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

AND

pronounced by me on this the 4th day of February, 2009.

TheGeneral Manager,

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , Mandamarri Division, Mandamarri,

Appendixofevidence

Adilabad-504231 .

....Respondent Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

APPEARANCES

Respondent

NIL

For the Petitioner :

Documents marked for the Petitioner

Forthe Respondent:

NIL

Sri M. Shankar Narayan, Advocate

Documents marked for the Respondent

AWARD

NIL

नई दिल्ली , 20 मई , 2009

TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L -22012/245 /2007 - IR (CM - II) dated 30-10-2007 referred the following dispute under section 10( 1 )( d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of M/s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited and their workmen. The reference is,

SCHEDULE

का.आ. 1681-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एस. सी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 59/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/245/2007- आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

"Whether the action of the management of M/s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited, in imposing the penalty of stoppage of three increments with cumulative effect from 1-8-2006 on Sri Gunda Shankar is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is theworkman entitled ?"

New Delhi , the 20th May, 2009

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 59/2007 and notices were issued to the parties .

S.O. 1681. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 59/2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M/s . Singareni Collieries Company Limited, and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 20-5-2009.

2.On 6-2-2009 both parties called absent . Petitioner has not filed claim statement even after two years of receipt ofthis reference. Case is closed for want of prosecution and non-filing of claim statement Nil Award is passed. Transmit.

[No. L-22012/245/2007 -IR(CM- II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 6th day of February, 2009

ANNEXURE

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

PRESENT

Appendix ofevidence

Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer.

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Respondent

Dated the 6th day of Fabruary, 2009 Industrial Dispute No. 59/2007

NIL

BETWEEN

Documents marked for the Petitioner

ThePresident(Sri Bandari Lingaiah),

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent NIL

Petitioner

Singareni Collieries Employees Union (CITU), Qtr . No. T-39, SMG XRoad, Somagudem (Via Bellampalli PO), Adilabad-504251 .

2061 GI/09-17 3344

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] नई दिल्ली , 21 मई , 2009

Sang over regularization of Muster Roll Employees of 11 /C , the expression " agreed to regularization " agreed to similarly regularise " occurring in these terms respectively mean regularization of the concerned employees in their respective designations /grades in which they were working prior to settlement or the employer is justified in regularising them in lower designations /grades "

का.आ. 1682.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बैलाडिला आयरन ओर प्रोजेक्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद मे केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या- सीजीआईटी/एलसी/आर/ 63/87 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-2/9/86- कन.2/डी- III ( बी ) ] कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 21st May, 2009

S.O. 1682. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.CGIT/ LC/R/ 63 /87) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation tothe management ofBailadila Iron Ore Project and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on20-5-2009.

[No. L- 2/9/86-Con.II/D.III (B) ] KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/63/87

Presiding Officer : Shri Mohd . Shakir Hasan

Workmen/Union

The Secretary, Metal Mine Workers Union (INTUC ) Bailadila Iron Ore Project, Deposit No.14 , Kirandul, Distt. Bastar ( M.P. ) ...........

Versus

The General Manager , Bailadila Iron Ore Project, Deposit No. 14, Kirandul Distt. Bastar (MΜ.Ρ.)

.........Management

AWARD

Passed on this 5th day of May, 2009

2. The case of the applicant in short is that Metal Mine Workers Union , Bailadila Iron Ore Project , Deposit No. 14 , Kirandul is represented through their Secretary. It is stated that the management of NMDC recruited 68 workers ( list enclosed) on daily rated basis during the period from 1969 to 1975 in different categories on payment of daily wages at different rates according to their designations . It is stated that these daily rated workers were brought to regular cadre sometimes in 1981 but instead of regularising them in the same. designations in which they were holding during their employment on muster roll , the management regularised them in lower designations /grades . They further stated that in terms of the certified standing orders as applicable for the corporation , any workman who has completed six months of continuous service is classified as permanent and as such these daily wagers were entitled to be regularised on substantive post on which they were working . It is also stated that the muster roll ofthe workman appointed in Baba Bhudan in Karnataka State were regularised in regular pay scales on the designations they were originally appointed on Muster Roll whereas these workmen were regularised on the lower grade/ designation . It is also stated that they have no knowlegde about the settlement arrived between the management and Samyukta Khadan Mazdoor Union on this matter and majority of these workmen were members of SKMS Union . It is stated that no Union can agree for regularisation in lower designation/grades even if the management and SKMS Union had agreed to place these workmen in lower grades/designations . It is further stated that such settlement did not hold good . Itisfurther stated that the management had violated the provisions of certified standing orders , Mines Act and other service conditions laid down for the corporation in down grading these 68 workmen of muster roll in regularising them in the lower designations /grades . On these grounds , it is submitted that regarding the settlement " agreed to regularization " agreed to similarly regularise " simply means to bring the workmen from daily wages to regular time scale and does not mean to regularise them in the lower designations /grades .

1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No.L - 2 /9/86-Con.II/D.III (B ) dated 23rd March , 1987 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :-

"Whether in term 1 &2 of the memorandum of settlement dated 6-3-81 between the management of Bailadila Iron Ore Project, Deposit No. 14 and their workmen represented by Samyukta Khadan Mazdoor

3. On the other hand , the management has also appeared and filed Written Statement to contest the proceedings . It is stated that this proceeding is referred by the Government under Sec . - 36(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act which permits the Central Government to 3345 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

settlement dated 6-3-81 means only regularization in lower cadre of regular post available and that the management is justified in regularising the muster roll employees in the lower designation/grades,

4. Now the important point is only to interpret the expression " agreed to regularization " and " agreed to similarly regularise " . This is also to see as to whether it means regularization of the concerned employees in their respective designation grades or in which the management has regularised them in lower designation .

5. In order to prove the case, the applicant has examined only 2 witnesses . On the other hand , the management has also examined 2 witnesses and has also produced some documents .

6. Before entering into the evidence , it is necessary to deal the memorandum of settlement arrived between the employer and SKMS Union , Bailadila Branch on 6-3-1981 . The terms of settlement run as follows:-

" TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

1. It is agreed to regularise in the first instance a batch of 16 persons out of M.R.employees of 11 /C by 31st March , 1981 .

2. It is further agreed to similarly regularise the remaining 41 M.R. staff of 11 /C in a phased manner in due time .

3. It is agreed that the parties shall send the implementation report of the settlement to the ALC( C ) Raipur upto 5th June , 1981 , failing which it shall be presumed that the terms of settlement have been fully implemented.

4. The union agreed to withdraw the strike notice dated 10-2-1981 in view of the aforesaid settlement ."

7. On plain reading of the terms of settlement, it shows that at the first stage , the management has to regularise only 16 persons out of muster roll employees of 11 /C by 31-3-1981 and the 2nd terms of settlement shows that the remaining 41 muster roll staff of 11 /C is to be regularised in a similar way in due time . There is nothing in the settlement to show that they have to be regularised on the post in which they were working as muster roll employees . I find that there is no ambiguity inthe terms of settlement that these workmen had to be regularised on the post in which they were appointed.

8. Now let us examine the evidence of the witnesses of the workman . WW-1 Pradeep Singh has stated in his evidence that he started working as muster roll in the year 1972 in Bailadila Iron Ore Project as Mason and the work was ended in January, 1975 . Thereafter he was shifted at Deposit No.11/C in the same capacity. In the year 1981 , the investigation work ended refer a question to the Labour Court if there is any doubt about the interpretation . The party to the settlement were the SKMS Union and the management . It is stated that the said Union has not raised any doubt about the interpretation of the settlement and the Metal Mines Workers Union were not party to this settlement and this reference has been made at the instance of outsider. It is also stated that the intention of making the reference is to create an industriál unrest . It is further stated that the wordings are extremely clear as there can be no doubt about the interpretations . Further case of the management is that several peoples were newly employed on the muster roll purely on temporary/ casual basis in 11 /C investigation which was a separate Unit and as such, they were not on the rolls of Bailadila IronOre Project . This casual labours were not required to be given regular employment because it was only at investigation stage and these employees have no specific job . They have to run on vacancies that might be on the day to day basis . It is further stated that SKMS Union raised a dispute with the management claiming that these employees should not be kept in muster roll for a long time and they should be given a regular job as and when available . The management gave sympathetic consideration and regularised the muster roll employees under the clear - cut understanding that regularization will be on the lower post and that too as and when available . It is further stated that if the intention of the parties was to regularise employee in a particular category, the wording of the settlement would have been totally different and it would have been not mere " regularization" but to "regularise the post in which they were working " . The wording of settlement was definitely chosen with the clear understanding that regularization under any circumstances cannot be in a higher post or on the lower post in which the employees were deemed to be working . It is stated that in BIOP, Deposit - 14, certain vacancies were created due to promotions and posts in the lower cadre as and when available . As such these workmen were regularised on the lower post as per bipartite settlement between the Union and the management as per the settlement made between the parties . It is also stated that Baba- Bhudan investigation in Karnataka is a separete unit and has not connection with the administration of Deposit No. 14 project . The SKMS Union demanded that these daily rated workmen be given regular job but as per tripartite memorandum of settlement entered into with the SKMS , these daily rated workmen were regularised on humanitarian ground in time scale in phased manner depending upon availability of vacancies in Deposit No.14 project . It is stated that the management has not violated any provisions of the standing orders , Mines Act as alleged by the applicant . On these grounds , it is submitted that the expression " agreed to regularization" "agreed to similarly regularise " in the memorandum of 3346

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009 / JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

the parties to the settlement that the employees were to regularise on the same post which they were working rather their intention was to regularise in the vacancies existing in the said project .

and the management told him that there was no post of mason and they would take him as Khalasi . He has further stated that he was absorbed as Khalasi . This clearly shows that the said workman had accepted the offer of the management. He has further stated that he had never been to Baba Bhudan and never seen the settlement effected with Baba Bhudan workers . This also shows that he is not competent to say about the settlement of employee of another unit. He has further stated in his evidence that in the year 1972 , he has received appointment letters of Mason but he lost it . This also shows that there is no documentary proof in possession of the workman to show that he had ever worked as mason . His evidence does not support the fact that the expression " agreed to regularisation " or "agreed to similarly regularise " means to bring the workman from daily wages to regular time scale on the post he was previously working .

11. On the other hand , the management has also produced oral as well as documentary evidence Ex.M - 1 is the extract of clause - 7.1 of Feasibility Committee report . This is filed to show that a Feasibility Study Committee was constituted to study the working conditions of the Muster Roll workmen and to assess the permanent work force required for regularization of Muster Roll Workmen of Investigation units of NMDC Limited . Thereafter the same report was rectified by the corporate Unit Bipartite Committee which is marked as Exhibit M - 2 .It is argued that these Feasibility Committee's recomendations were not applicable to these Muster Roll workers as these reports came into force after 7-2-1982 whereas these Muster Roll workmen were regularised in the year 1981. It is clear that these workmen cannot take any benefit from these Feasibility Reports and they are only concerned with the settlement made between the SKMS , Bailadila and the management on 6-3-1981.

9. Another witness adduced on behalf of the workman is WW-2 Kalyan Singh . He has also admitted this fact that he was Muster Roll employee as Operational Assistant since 1972 till 1981. Thereafter in the year 1981 , the Khalasi post was offered to him though in Baba Bhudan, 3 employees were regularised on the same post in which they were working . His evidence clearly shows that the employee of different project were regularised in the same post as the vacancies were existing there . His evidence does not show that there were vacancies of higher post in his project and even then they were not regularised on those posts . He has further stated that he has no knowledge that there was any settlement between the Samyukta Khadan Mazdoor Sang Union and the management in presence of the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( C) , Raipur . This shows that he is not competent to say about the intention of the parties regarding the expression " agreed to regularisation" or " agreed to similarly regularise" as he was not present while the said settlement took place between the SKMS Union and the management in the presence of Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) , Raipur .

10. It is not out of place to say that the alleged memorandum of settlement arrived between SKMS , Bailadila and the management which is the subject matter of the interpretation , show that Shri S.R.Bakshi , S.R.Titus and Shri M.Das who were representing the workman have not been examined in the proceeding though these witnesses are the most competent witnesses to say that what was the intention of the settlement with regard to the regularisation of the Muster Roll . In absence of their evidence , it appears that the applicant has failed to substantiate his contention that Muster Roll employees were to regularise on the same post in which they were working . The said settlement clearly shows that it was not the intention of

12. The management has also examined two witnesses MW - I Shri J.D.N.Rao , Asstt. Manager( Personnel ) , Donimalai Iron Ore Mine , Karnataka was working as Asstt . Personnel Officer at BIOP , Deposit- 14 during the alleged period . He has further stated that SKMS ( AITUC ) raised a demand with the management that these workmen should be given some regular job as and when available because these workmen were working as Muster Roll for pretty long time. He has stated that there was no demand for regularisation in a particular post . His evidence shows that there was no intention to regularise on the post in which they were working as Muster Roll . He has further stated that SKMS issued a strike notice under I.D.Act demanding regularisation of the Muster Roll employees of 11 /C investigation . He has further stated that the matter was seized by the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( C) , Raipur and after prolonged discussion , the dispute was resolved by arriving at a settlement on 6-3-1981 between the management of BIOP, Deposit No.14 and the workmen represented by SKMS ( AITUC ) Union over the regularisation of 11 / C Investigation department of NMDC . He has also identified the signatures on the said settlement. He has stated that on the basis of settlement in the said memorandum of settlement , the management had regularised the Muster Roll employees of 11 / C investigation in phase - wise and by way of implementation of the said settlement, the management regularised them in two batches in the post of Khalasi . He has further stated that the said Union has moved the application before the ALC (C ) , Raipur to remove 3347

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1/2006 in I.D. 17/2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management BPCL and their workman, whichwas received by the Central Government on20-5-2009.

[No. L- 30011 /31 /2002-IR (M)] KAMAL BAKHRU, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

the ambiguity as to the interpretation and after discussion before the ALC (C), Raipur , the . Union requested to close the case . This shows that there was no dispute with respect to the interpretation and regularisation of the employees of 11 /C in the lowest grades . His evidence supports the case of the management. Moreover it also appears that the dispute with regard to interpretation of the said settlement has been concluded before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) , Raipur .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT CHENNAI

Thursday, the 2nd April, 2009

Present: A.N.Janardanan , Presiding Officer

Comp 1/2006 in ID 17/2003

BETWEEN

..... 1st Party/Petitioner

The Petroleum Employees Union, Rep. By its General Secretary) C/oBharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , 1, Ranganathan Gardens , Anna Nagar (West) Chennai-600040

13. MW-2 Mr. E. Sivan Nair was working as Jr.Manager Personnel ) with NMDC Ltd. , BIOP , Deposit No. 14. He was also working in the same project during the relevant period. He has also supported the case of the management and has also corroborated the evidence ofMW- I Mr. J.D.N. Rao . His evidence also shows that theMuster Roll of 11 /C Investigation were to regularise simply in the said project . He has also supported that Feasibility Committee's recommendations were not applicable in the case of these workmen as this recommendation came into force after their regularisation f.e. after 7-2-1982 . Moreover they had unconditionally accepted the offer to be regularised in the lowest grades . His evidence appears to have established the case of the management .

..... 2nd Party/Management

And The Dy. General Manager (HRS ), Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , No. 1, Ranganathan Gardens Anna Nagar (West), Chennai -40

14. Considering the entire evidence on the record, I find that the management/ employer is justified in regularising them in lower designations/ grades . In the result , the reference is decided in favour of the management and against the workmen/applicant without any costs.

APPEARANCE

For the Petitioner ....... M/ s . Row & Reddy For the Management.... M/ s . T.S. Gopalan & Co. 15. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment asper rules.

ORDER

MOHD.SHAKIR HASAN, Presiding Officer

This is a complaint under Section 33 (A) of the IDAct, 1947.

नई दिल्ली , 21 मई , 2009

APrecise of the petitioner 's case is as follows:

In ID 17/2003 the reference made by the Central Government is :

का.आ. 1683.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.पी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या-कैम्प. 1/2006 इन आई डी-17/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the demand raised by Petroleum Employees Union and Petroleum Workers Union against the Management of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. over the demand for continuing the self- lease formula without a change w.e.f. 01-06-1998 is justified? If so, to what relief the concerned workmen are entitled"?

[सं. एल-30011/31/2002- आई. आर. (एम. ) ] कमल बाखरू, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi, the 21st May, 2009

1. Pending the reference , the members of the Petitioner Union on 22-09-2005 requested for renewal of self- lease without prejudice to the rights of the parties in ID 17/2003 . The Management in the reply dated S.O. 1683.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.Comp .

3348

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

Thus the tenancy agreement came to an end on 31-12-2005 and from January 2006, they became entitled only to HRA. There is no service condition connected with the scheme . The self-lease agreement conditions are not service conditions . There is no violation of any service condition to give a cause of action to the petitioners to file this petition . The referred question in ID 17/2003 has got nothing to do with the SLS agreement or Self- iease scheme, therefore no question of alteration of service condition much less prejudicial to the workmen does arise. There is no indulgence of unfair labour practice by the Respondent or contravention of Section -33 ( 1 )(a) of the ID Act: The claim of the petitioner is to be rejerted.

3. The Petitioner Union in the reply statement filed, reiterated their contentions in the complaint petition and they therefore have clinged to the prayer that the complaint be allowed.

4. The points for consideration are:

( i) "Whether the action of the Management in denying the benefit of self- lease to the members of the Petitioner Union during the pendency of ID 17/2003 without permission of the Tribunal under Section - 33 ( 1 ) of the ID Act is illegal and void?"

(ii) If so , to what relief the Petitioner Union is entitled?

Point No. 1

07-12-2005 informed that the period of lease will be upto 31-12-2003 , which had otherwise reached completion of 10 years and come to an end: The letter stated a number of contigencies on the happening of which and applicable to the workers that the self- lease agreement will be terminated with due notice, such as appraisal score in the case of marketing workmen regarding their performance being poor or below average , the workers not residing or letting out the property , their remaining absent on loss of pay for 30 days and their remaining on negative pay for three consecutive months . The draft lease agreement enclosed showed reduction of the lease period from 10 years to 3 years , replaced earlier terms with new terms less favourable to the employees . The employees are resulted in hardship in case the lease is cancelled under an additional Clause "Rental Payment and Maintenance Charges" were made as per the lease agreement. It is made to alter the very character of the self- lease as a service condition and it will reduced it to amere contractual agreement . The request by letter sent to the Management not to effect changes in the self- lease scheme pending the ID was not considered . The management by a letter withdraw the self- lease facility and placed the employee on HRA w.e.f. 01-01-2006 for the alleged reason that employee did not submit the lease agreement as per the format enclosed. By the introduction of new Clause (7)(d) , it will disentitle the employees to enjoy the self-lease scheme benefit . Pending adjudication in the ID, Respondent ought to have got permission from the Tribunal before altering the self- lease scheme which is in relation to the conditions of the service of the workman . There is violation of mandatory requirement of Section - 33 ( 1 ) of the ID Act and it is an unfair labour practice enforced prejudicially to the interests of the workmen and the same is contrary to Section -9A of the I. D. Act and Clause -8 of the IV Schedule . It is prayed that an award may be passed against the Management holding that the action illegal and to direct to continue to grant the benefit of self- lease .

2. In the Counter Statement, the Respondent raised the contentions and epitome of which is as follows:

Under Section-33 (A) , it is not to a Trade Union but only to a worker that there is right to complain. In the Circular dated 01-09-1995 , the Management made it clear that the Rental Ceilings are to be renewed from time to time . The lease agreement was executed on the acceptance of the said offer of the eligible employees which is an agreement of tenancy and not part of a service condition . The self- lease agreement on coming to an end after August, 2005, the rights and obligations thereunder ceased after August, 2005. The Respondent informed the employees the new terms for the lease which were not acceptableby them except to a few.

5. Now as it is discernibly the ID 17/2003 has already been disposed of wherein it has been held that the conditions under the self- lease scheme do not partake the character of any service conditions . The Learned Authorised Representative of the Petitioner Union and the Learned Counsel for the Respondent vehemently argued to support their respective contentions . But it could be found that going by the recitals and the introduction of the scheme voluntarily by the Management as a scheme beneficial to the employees quite distinct from and independent of any of the service conditions applicable to them and reserving in the conditions of the very scheme itself, the right to the Management to modify the terms thereunder and necessitated by the changed circumstances and the Management having modified the conditions thereby accidently rendering some benefits hitherto enjoyed by the employees less favourable to them does not at all afford any ground for the Petitioner Union to approach this forum seeking to pass an award restraining the Management from doing so . It is to be found that Self- lease Scheme is not a service condition . Therefore , the modification caused to the conditions in the Self- lease Scheme though ostensibly some of them turning out to be less favourable to them , the petitioner does not have any legal footing or locus -standi to complain about it .

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3349

भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

They may either accept the scheme in full or opt to reject it in toto . They cannot be allowed to accept the favourable part and refuse the unfavourable part, since it is not a service condition which alone is open to challenge under Section - 33A of the ID Act . Therefore the petitioner is not entitled to the prayer sought for.

Point No. 2

6. The petitioner is therefore not entitled to the relief prayed for. The petition is liable to be dismissed .

7. In the result the petition is dismissed . No costs. (Dictated to the P.A. , trancribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 2nd April , 2009) .

A. N. JANARDANAN, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 21 मई , 2009

का.आ. 1684.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार आयल इंडिया लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, गुवाहाटी के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या-06/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-30012/ 17 /2005- आईआर ( एम ) ] कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 21st May, 2009 S.O. 1684. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 06/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Guwahati now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Oil India Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 20-5-2009. [No. L-30012/17/2005- IR(M)]

KAMAL BAKHRU, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, GUWAHATI, ASSAM

PRESENT: Shri D. K. Deb Roy, M.A. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer

Ref. Case No. 06 of 2005

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute Between :- TheManagement of Oil India Limited, Duliajan.

Vrs.

Their Workman Sri Makhan Barthakur .

APPEARANCES

For the Workman : Sri A.Das Gupta,Advocate. Sri S.Chakrabarty, Advocate

For theManagement: Sri S.N.Sarma; Advocate Sri N.Sarma, Advocate. Date ofAward: 11-05-200

AWARD

1. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section ( 1) and sub -section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the present reference is arising out of the Government Notification vide Memo No. L-30012/ 17/2005 - IR (M ) dated 25-07- 2005, for adjudication of the issue as described in the Schedule.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Oil IndiaLimited, Duliajan in dismissing the workman Shri Makhan Barthakur , Supervising Assistant , Land Department from service w.e.f. 12-8-2002 is fair, just and legal? If not, what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

2. Notice was duly served upon the parties and accordingly they appeared before this Tribunal . In order to ensure fairness and transparency both the parties were allowed to adduce evidence plethora of documents have been exhibited by the parties. The matter was heard at length.

3. The case of the workman may be reporduced below:-

Workman Makhan Barthakur was appointed as Land Clerk in Oil India Ltd. Duliajan (herein called the Management) on 4-11-76 and subsequently he was promoted to Supervising Assistant . The main objective ofOil Inida Ltd. is to extract curde oil . For that purpose they are to carry out drilling operation based on report oftheGeological Department . Drilling operation requires acquistion of land in different places . The land department thereafter collects cadastral map to ascertain the name of the pattadars , revenue village , etc. Thereafter , value of the land is settled up in consultation with the pattadars or occupiers of the land in question . In the year 1985-86 Oil India Ltd. decided to hold some land within the area of Kathaloni area of Tengakha to carry out; their drilling operation . The area was earmarked as HJP area. On completion of the usual process the execution of sale deed was initiated. The workman was entrusted with the duties of purchasing non-judicial stamp papers amounting to Rs . 1,02,200. It is further stated in the W.S. that he purchased the stamp 3350

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

5. Both the sides participated in the proceeding and adduced evidence in support of their respective claims . My learned Predecessor came to a finding that the departmental enquiry was not fair . Accordingly the present proceeding was taken up on merit.

6. The Management contested the proceeding by filing Written Statement refuting the claim of the workman . According to the Management the workman was a Supervising Assistant ( land) at the relevant time and he was entrusted to purchase non- judicial stamps for execution of sale deed in respect of the lands acquired for location of HJP for drilling purpose . Accordingly the workman had drawn Rs . 1,02,200 from the Accounts Department of the Management for purchasing non -judicial stamp . However , during vigilance enquiry it came to light that the workman neither purchased the non -judicial stamps nor refunded the amount so taken by him thus misappropriated the entire amount . The vigilance officer suggested for drawal of departmental enquiry against the workman vide his letter dated 12-5-2000 . Inpursuance of the recommendation of the vigilance officer departmental proceeding was initated and on completion of the enquiry it was found that the charges brought against the workman were proved amounting to misconduct and thereby he was dismissed from service with effect from 12.30 p.m. on 13-8-2002 . The further case of the Management is that the workman was charge sheeted on 8-6-2000 for misappropriation of Company's money amounting to Rs. 4,82,437.50 , another charge sheet issued on 9-7-2001 for misappropriation of Rs . 4,51,800 , and again on 20-8-2001 for misappropriation of Rs . 2,04,436.50. That on 13-3-2002 the workman was again charged for committing fraudulent act thereby causing heavy loss to the Management . The further case of the Management is that the domestic enquiry was conducted in full compliance of the Principle of Natural Justice and the principle of " Audi - aleram partem" was also followed . The Management lastly asserted that the workman committed a serious misconduct and that is why he was rightly dismissed from service and there is no merit in the petition .

papers from the authorized vendor and handed over the same to his Officer along with the receipt issued by the stamp vendor . Thereafter, he was served with a show cause notice dated 13-11-2000 alleging that he had withdrawn a sum of Rs . 1,02,200 from the Accounts Department of Oil India Ltd. , Duliajan in cash for purchasing non -Judicial stamp papers in respect of purchasing land acquired for drilling purposes . But the workman neither purchased the stamp papers nor refunded the cash money and he misappropriated the entire amount. Thereafter , the workman submitted his reply on 26-12-2000 stating inter- alia that he purchased the non-Judicial stamp papers as advised by the Senior Manager ( land) and accordingly the papers were handed over to him . The further case of the workman is that the money receipt issued by the vendor was also submitted to the Accounts Department . According to him the allegations levelled against him was baseless . The Management was not satisfied with the reply and formal enquiry was started against him. Mr. S. Gogoi , Mechanical Engineer was appointed as an Enquiry Officer. It is further alleged by the workman the enquiry was conducted giving a go - bye to the established principles of law and the workman was not given any opportunity to represent his case . The Enquiry Officer submitted his report on 5-12-2001 holding that the charges against the workman were proved. The Chief Manager ( land) forwarded the copy of the aforesaid enquiry report on 5-1-2002 to the workman to express his opinion within 10 days . The workman submitted his written explanation against the enquiry report . Thereafter , the Displinary Authority without considering his representation dismissed him from service on 12-8-02 . The order of dismissal was issued by the Chief Manager ( land) , Oil India Ltd. , Duliajan with a direction to move the Chief Industrial Relation Manager , if so desired under Clause 23.1 of the Company's Certified Standing Orders . The workman preferred an appeal before the Industrial Relation Manager , which was not properly addressed to . Thereafter, the workman raised an industrial dispute for his reinstatement with full back wages . The conciliation proceeding was also initiated but the dispute could not be settled up . The conciliation officer submitted his failure report u/ s 12(4) of the Industrial Dispute Act to the appropriate Government .

4. The further case of the workman is that though domestic enquiry was initiated by the Management but no Natural Justice was done to him and the matter was decided behind his back. According to him the enquiry report ex- facie appeaappears to be illegal and should not be allowed to stand . My learned predecessor having heard both sides framed a preliminary issue as follows :

7. Heard , Mr. Dasgupta, the Learned Counsel for the workman who in his suave submission has contended inter -alia that the workman had withdrawn Rs . 1,02,200 from the Accounts Department of Management for purchasing non -judicial stamps and accordingly he purchased the same and handed over to Senior Manager ( land ) . The workman also submitted the receipt issued by the Stamp Vendor as proof to substantiate factum of purchase of stamp papers . According to him no liability can be fastened to the workman and he may be reinstated in the service with "Whether the domestic enquiry conducted by the Management was fair or not ?" 3351

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13, 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

him . According to him , Ext.12 is the money receipt issued by the vendor whereupon Ext . 12 ( 1 ) is the signature of the stamp vendor N. Lahon. He has also admitted that though his case is that he handed over the stamp papers to Mr. Saifulla but he has not been examined by him neither in the departmental proceeding nor before this Court . The workman has further admitted that he refunded the money amounting to Rs . 1,02,200 to the accounts department vide Ext. 17. He has also admitted that he took no receipt from Mr. Saifulla to show that he handed over the stamp papers to Mr. Saifulla. The Workman during cross- examination has honestly admitted the charge sheets Ext . 19, 20, 21 & 22 submitted against him .

full backwages . Per -contra Mr. Sarma the learned Counsel appearing for the Management has controverted the submission advanced by Mr. Dasgupta . According to him it is the admitted position that the workman took Rs.1,02,200 from the Accounts Department of Management for purchasing non -judicial stamps . But he neither purchased the same nor refunded the money which is a clear case of misconduct resulting the dismissal of the workman. According to him no illegality has been committed by the Management and the order ofdismissal deserves to be affirmed. Having considered the rival contentions advanced by the learned Counsel for the parties , I feel it convenient to discuss the evidence on record.

9. Now, let us consider the evidence of the Management. M.W.I , Narayan Lahon has stated in his evidence that he is a registered stamp vendor at D.C.'s Court, Dibrugarh. According to him a stamp vendor can sell stamp papers worth Rs . 50 to a particular person which was prevalenttill 1990, subsequently it was enhanced to Rs.2,000. According to him no person from Oil India Ltd. , Duliajan purchased any stamp papers from him . He has further stated so far he knows Oil India Ltd. used to purchase stamp papers directly through Treasury . Hedoes not know the Workman Shri Makhan Barthakur . He has specifically said that Ext. 11 , certificate was not issued by him nor he put his signature thereon . One officer from Oil India Ltd. came to him and had shown Ext. 11 , the receipt . Vide Ext . 12, this witness has endorsed that the signature contained in Ext . 11 is neither his signature nor his seal . Ext. 12(1 ) is his endorsement to that eftect along with his signature and seal . In cross - examination this witness has stated he came to Guwahati on 27-01-2007 to depose on this case on behalf of the Management . It was suggested bythe Management that he has deposed falsely on being influenced by the Oil India Ltd. though he answered in negative.

MW.2, Sri Saroj Kumar Deka has stated in his evidence that he is working as Manager (Vigilance ) in Oil India Ltd. , Duliajan . He knows the workman Makhan Barthakur. There were so many vigilance cases pending against him and he enquired into the vigilance cases . He also conducted the vigilance case in connection with the present reference case involvmg Rs . 1,02,200 in respect of purchase of stamp papers by the workman . The workman had drawn Rs.1,02,200 from Accounts Department vide Ext. 13 on 14-5-94. This witness has further stated that when the workman was asked as to what had happened about the purchase ofNon - Judicial stamp papers , he replied that he handed over the stamp papers to Mr. S.N.Saifulla. Thereafter, Mr. Barthakur was asked by the Manager to submit receipt, if any, to show that stamp papers were in fact handed to Mr. Saifulla. The witness has further stated that the workman informed the Management vide Ext . 17 8. The workman Sri Makhan Barthakur has testified in his evidence that initially he was appointed as Supervising Assistant in the land Department of Oil India Ltd. , posted at Duliajan and subsequently he was promoted to the post of Supervising Asstt . in the year 1997. According to him the function of the land department is to acquire land for drilling purpose and for this purpose Oil India Ltd. acquired a land the location of HJP and he was entrusted to purchase non- judicial stamp papers for execution of sale deed . At the relevant time Mr. S.N. Saifulla was the Manager (land).. Accordingly he had drawn Rs.1,02,200 from the Accounts Department for purchasing non -judicial stamps . He purchased the non-judicial stamp papers from the registered stamp vendor namely N.Lohan , who was known to him ever before . He also received the money receipt Ext . 11 from the stamp vendor. The money receipt was forwarded to the Accounts Department. Ext . D is the photo copy of the forwarding letter dated 19-4-95 . No pattadars of the land could be located as such, the Sale Deed could not be executed and that was reported to the Management vide his letter Ext. 14. Ext . 14( 1 ) is the signature . By letter Ext . 15 the workman informed the Senior Manager (land) that he handed over the non -judicial stamp papers to Mr. S.N.Saifulla, thereafter a domestic enquiry was conducted . Ext.2 is the relevant charge - sheet . He replied against the charge-sheet vide Ext . 3. Senior Manager(land) Mr. A.C. Baishya asked him vide Ext.16 to produce the acknowledgement as regards delivery of stamp papers to Mr. Saifulla. He was also asked to substantiate his claim as to the factum of purchasing of stamp papers . He has admitted that he saw Mr. Lohan deposed as a witness on behalf of the Management in the present proceeding . In the first line ofthe cross-examination , the workman has admitted that altogether 4 charge-sheets were submitted against him . He has admitted that no Sale Deed was executed during his tenure. This witness has specifically admitted that when he paid Rs.1,02,200 to the stamp vendor for purchasing stamps no money receipt was obtained by

2061G1/09-18 3354

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23, 1931

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii)] Therefore, no question of termination arises . There is no either any question of unfair labour practice on the petitioner.

5. The points for determination are :

(i) Whether the non -employment of the petitioner bytheManagement is legal and justified ?

(ii) ifnot, to what relief the petitioner is entitled ?

one giving rise to any cause of action to raise any claim against the Respondent . He was not terminated from service oftheRespondent . He is not entitled to be employed under the Respondent . There does not arise any question of unfair labour practice . It is also equally correct to say that no question of retrenchment of petitioner , notice of retrenchment or payment of compensation in lieu ofnotice or retrenchment compensation or any question of employment of the petitioner arises under the Respondent .

PointNo. 1

PointNo. 2

6.On the side of the petitioner , WW 1 and WW 2 were examined and Ex. W 1 to Ex. W 12 were marked. No evidence was adduced on the side of the Respondent . Heard the Respondent in spite of several adjournments granted to the petitioner, he did not place his oral or written arguments.

8. The Respondent is not under a duty to provide employment to the petitioner and , the non - employment of the petitioner under the Respondent is only legal and justified since he has not succeeded to establish any existing or prospective right to be employed under the Respondent. In the light of above finding, the petitioner, is not entitled to any relief.

9. The reference is answered as above .

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him . corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 12th May, 2009 )

A.N. JANARDANAN, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined :

For the I Party/Petitioner

WW 1 , Sri G. Sethuram

For the II Party/ Management WW 2, Sri G. Loganathan

Documents marked on the side of the Petitioner

Ex.No. Date

Description

Ex. W 1 19-1-1998 Representation of petitioner

Ex . W2 21-9-1998 Representation of petitioner

Ex. W 3 30-10-1998 Representation of petitioner

Ex. W4 23-4-1999 Representation of petitioner

Ex. W5 21-8-1992 Certificate by Additional ChiefEngineer

21-9-1992

Ex. W 6

Certificate by Asstt. Engineer

Ex. W7 23-2-1992 Certificateby Jr. Engineer

Ex. W 8 16-3-1998 Certificate by Anil Kumar Engineering Contractor

Ex. W 9 18-3-1998 Certificate by R.G. Lakshmipathi and Co.

Ex. W 10 23-3-1998 Certificate by R. Ramanjulu

Ex. W 11 11-6-1990 Letter of R.R. Pillai

Ex. W 12

Copy of Identity Card.

On theManagement's side

Ex. No. Date

Description

Nil

7. WW 1 and WW 2 are the two witnesses examined on the side of the petitioner. Their evidence is not of a nature to render even a preponderating probability of the petitioner's case being true . Their testimony together with the documentary evidence adduced does not at all show that the petitioner was at any time under the employment ofthe Respondent . He was only a contract employee under various Engineers who were working in project areas not shown to be working under Respondent. There is no evidence of any kind to prove that the petitioner has been receiving any wages from the Respondent's office . It is seen that whatever payments were being made to the petitioner were made under hand receipts given by the different officers under whom the petitioner had been attached. After the examination of two witnesses on the side of the petitioner , he further wanted to get three other witnesses also examined and to that end he filed IA 15/2001 for an order to issue summons to them . The same was dismissed by this Tribunal on 22-2-2001 against which in Writ before the High Court of Madras filed as WP No. 4944/2001 as per the order dated 28-8-2008 , the High Court directed the three witnesses to be summoned and allowed tobe examinedby the petitioner. Thereafter, summons were issued to be said three witnesses . But the summons could notbe served and they were returned. The said witnesses could not be procured for examination . The petitioner did not pursue further steps or any stemps with the required efficacy to have them procured before this Tribunal for examination. Therefore , the evidence is left with what had been let in already . The said evidence is of no avail to substantiate the case of the petitioner that he was an employee under the Respondent rather than being an employee of the nature of contract labour . Therefore , as rightly contended by the learned counsel for the Respondent, the petitioner is having only the status of a contract labour . Any service rendered under a contractor cannot be equated with any service under the Respondent and, therefore, whatever has been the length of service rendered by him, he cannot become entitled to a right under the Respondent so as to characterize his termination as 3355 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 21 मई , 2009

"Whether the action of the management of ONGC Ltd. , Mumbai in not accepting the demands raised by General Employees Association, Mumbai vide their strike notice dated 3-8-2000 (except demandNo. 3,5, 16 and4) is legal and justified? Ifnot, what relief the workmen concerned are entitled to? " का. आ. 1686.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ. एन. जी. सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 2 मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी-2/107/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को20-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-30011 /37/2001- आई.आर. ( एम ) ] कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी

2. Claim Statement is filed at Ex-6 by Dy. General Secretary of the Association which was replied by First Partyby filingwritten statement at Ex- 11 . Thereafter Union filed application Ex- 13 for interim reliefwhich was replied. by first party at Ex- 17. Issues are framed at Ex- 12 and matter was fixed for recording of evidence . Meanwhile at the request of union , matter placed before Lok Adalat vide Ex-22 and byEx-23 second party union filed application for disposing ofreference . Hence the order:

New Delhi, the 21st May, 2009

ORDER

VideEx-22and 23 , reference is disposed in LokAdalat.

Dated: 13-3-2009 A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer

EX-22

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD ON 13TH MARCH, 2009

S.O. 1686.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/107/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. 2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers inrelation to the management of ONGC and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 20-05- 2009.

Proceeding in respect of

Reference No. CGIT - 2/107 /2001

[No. L-30011/37/2001 - IR (M) ] KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer

Parties:

ONGC

ANNEXURE

and

theirworkman

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2, MUMBAI

Panel

Present:

Shri S. B. Kadam

A.A. Lad, Presiding Officer Reference : CGIT -2/107 of 2001

Shri M. B. Anchan

Shri S. V. Alva

Employers in relation to the Management ofOil and NaturalGas Corporation Ltd.

Appearance:

For the First Party Mr. S. Patil

TheExecutiveDirector (MRBC) Oil andNatural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Vasudhara Bhavan

For the Second Party :

Bandra (E) ] Mumbai-400 051

Mr. Jaiprakash Sawant alongwith Mr. D. N. Vidhate AND

Their Workmen

Mr. Jaiprakash Sawant , Advocate informs that the union is not interested in pursuing the above reference. Anapplication signed by Mr. Sawant, Advocate and Shri Vidhate is taken on record. Matter fixed for passing Award.

The DeputyGeneral Secretary General Employees Union Tel Rasayan Bhavan

TilakRoad, Dadar , Mumbai -400014.

Sd/-

APPEARANCE

(D. N. Vidhate)

(J. H. Sawant)

(Shriram Patil)

Gen.Secy.

Adv. for2nd Party

Adv. for 1st Party

For the Employer : Mr. G. D. Talreja, Representative For the Workmen : Mr. J. H. Sawant, Advocate

Gen.Employees Assn .

Mumbai , datedthe 13th March, 2009.

AWARD

Seen

Sd/-

PresidingOfficer CGIT-2, Mumbai

Sd/-

(S. V. Alva)

(M. B. Anchal)

(S. B. Kadam)

Panelists

The Central Government of India, Ministry of Labour byits Order No. L- 30011 /37 /2001 - IR (M) dated 10-8-2001 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub- section ( 10) and sub-section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following disputeto this Tribunal for adjudication :-

3356

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009 / JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

BEFORE THE CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2, MUMBAI Ref. CGIT- 2/ 107 of 2001

ONGC Ltd. ,

FirstParty V/s.

Their Workmen Representedby General Employees Association :

Second Party Application fordisposal of the reference for want of prosecution.

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR :

General Employees Association representing the second party hereby apply for disposal ofthe reference for want ofprosecution .

Mumbai

Dated:

Identifiedbyme

Sd/-

(J. H. Sawant) Adv. for 2nd party

Sd/- (D. N. Vidhate) Gen.Secy. General Employees Assn. Seen

No objection Sd/-

Sd/- 13-3-2009

(ForFirstParty) PresidingOfficer CGIT-2, Mumbai

Taken on record

Sd/-

13-3-2009

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ONGC and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 20-05-2009 .

[No. L-30011/58/2006- IR(M) ] KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

Present: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer

Dated the 23rdday of February, 2009

Industrial Dispute No. 6/2007 BETWEEN

The General Secretary, Visakhapatnam Harbour & Port Workers Union, H. No.26-26-27, Harbour Approach Road, Visakhapatnam-530013

Petitioner

AND

1. TheAsstt. Manager, ONGCLtd. , Krishana Godavari Project, Godavari Bhawan, Base Complex, Rajahmundary -533106

2. The President,

M/s. Ex. Servicemen Re- settlement Co-ordinate Cooperative Society Ltd. , D. No. 44-15-11 , Auto Centre , By Pass Road , Rajahmundry -533103 Respondent

APPEARANCES

Nil

For the Petitioner

For the Respondent

(M. B. Anchan) Panelist

नई दिल्ली, 21 मई , 2009

का.आ. 1687.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार ओ. एन. जी. सी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 6//2007) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-30011/58/2006- आई आर ( एम ) ] कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 21st May, 2009

S.O. 1687.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.6/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-30011/58/2006 - ID(M) dated 14-12-2006 referred the following dispute under Section 10( 1 )( d) of the I. D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of ONGC Ltd. , and another and their workman. The reference is :-

SCHEDULE

1 "Whether the action of the management of Ex- servicemen Re - settlement Co -operative Society Ltd. , Rajahmundry, the contractor of Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset in terminating theservice of Sri P. Siva Kumar and 6 others (as per list), Ex- security Guards at Visakhapatnam Fishing Harbour Area, as contended by the Visakhapatnam Harpour & Port Workers Union is legal and/or justified? Ifnot, to what reliefthe concerned workmen are entitled? " [भाग -खड 3 (ii) ]

3357

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

Versus

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 6/2007 and notices were issued to the parties.

TheDirector,

Respondent/ PartyNo.2

Central Ground Water Board, 1st Floor , N.S.Building, Civil Lines,Nagpur.

2. For serveral adjournments including today, i.e. 23-2-2009, both parties called absent . Petitioner has not filed claim statement. As such , in absence of Petitioner's pleadings , Nil Award is passed .

AWARD

Award passed accordingly. Transmit.

(Dated:7thMay, 2009)

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant Transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 23rd day of February , 2009.

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer

Appendixofevidence

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Respondent

Nil

Documents marked for the Petitioner

1. The Central Government after satisfying the existence of dispute between Shri Govardhan Haribhau Paunikar , Nagpur (Party No.1) and the Director, Central GroundWaterBoard, Nagpur (Party No.2) referredthe same for adjudication to this Tribunal vide its letter No.L-42012/ 29/92-D-2(B)-IR(DU) dated 30-4-1992 under clause ( d) of sub section ( 1 ) and sub section (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) with the following schedule .

Nil

Documents marked for the Respondent

Nil

नई दिल्ली , 22 मई , 2009

2. " Whether the Central Ground Water Board, Nagpur is an Industry under Section 2 (J) of the 1. D. Act , 1947. Ifso, whether the action of the management of Central Ground Water Board , Nagpur in terminating the services ofShri Goverdhan Haribhau Paunikar , Casual Worker/ Contingent Staff w.e.f. 8-5-1984 and regularizing the two junior workmen ignoring his claim being senior to them , is justified and legal ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"

का.आ. 1688.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल ग्राउंड वाटर बोर्ड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सीजीआईटी/एनजीपी/66/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल -42012 / 29/92 - डी. II ( बी ) / आई आर (डी.यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 22nd May, 2009

S.O. 1688. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT/ NGP/66/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Ground Water Board and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 22-05-2009.

[No. L-42012/29/92 -D.II (B )/IR(DU)] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRIAN.YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOURT COURT, NAGPUR

Case No.CGIT/NGP/66/2003

Date: 07-05-2009

Shri Goverdhan Haribhau

Petitioner/ PartyNo. 1

Paunikar , C/o Ganpatrao

Ninawe, Raghuji Nagar ,

Quarter No. 5/119,

5-1976 to 8-5-1984 3. The Petitioner approached with the contention that he was appointed through Employment Exchange as a Casual Worker by Party No.2 w.e.f. 5-6-1976 and was terminated and/ or retrenched and/ or discharged w.e.f. 8-5-1984 . He claims that the Order dated 8-5-1984 terminating him is illegal . According to him, the Party No.2 isan industry within the meaning of the I.D. Act 1947. He requested for a proper categorization, but it was denied by themanagement by an Orderdt . 15-5-1980 illegally. He was asked by letter dt.25-6-1985 to perform the duties in Establishment Section from 26-6-1985 from his position to the chemical laboratory. He was working in the Store Department. He, by letterdt. 1-1-1985 and 25-5-1985 , represented to the Chairman of the Board for reliefs , but his requested was not responded . He continuously worked without any break from 5-6-1976 to 8-5-1984 as a Skilled and Un-skilled worker. In the seniority list of the contingent staffofthe board as on 1-4-1982 his name was at Sl . No.62. Despite of the long tenure of eight years , he was not regularized . Hisjunior Shri Omprakash Kahar at Sl . No. 82 and Shri Kevaldas Wase at Sl . No. 84 were retained and also made regular. However, the Petitioner was arbitrarily removed by an Order dt. 8-5-1984 without following the provision of Section 25F and G of Industrial Dispute Act , 1947. The notice of retrenchment was never served. The compensation was not offered and paid. Thus the retrenchment is void. The Respondent Board constitutes anIndustry as defined under the Act . The Petitioner raised his dispute challenging his termination . Finally , as conciliation was not possible , the dispute is referred to this Tribunal .

Post Raghuji Nagar, Nagpur 3358

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009 / JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART 11 SEC. 3 (ii )] He has prayed to quash the Order of termination dtd. 8-5-1984 and further direct the Party No. 2 to reinstate him with full backwages.

The Respondent appeared and filed its WS . Having admitted the service tenure of the Petitioner, it has denied that he was rendering services to the satisfaction of the management and his service record was excellent . It has denied that theOrder of termination is illegal . He worked as a Contingent Labour from 5-6-1976 to 8-5-1984 and requested for regularization . However till his termination i.e. 8-5-1984, the proposal of regularization of Contingent Labour was pending due to the administrative and financial reasons like sanction and approval of the competent authority at New Delhi . Shri Kahar and Wase were regularized in 1983-84 as their confidential reports were good which were considered at the time of regularization . The confidential reports of the Petitioner were not good .

regularized.According to the management, the issue was pending for the decision of the higher authorities and approval from it. How this can be a defence for the claim of the Petitioner ? The Petitioner was working continuously for 8 years on the daily wages . Without making him permanent or regularizing his services , and paying cadre pay scale, he was continued as casual workman . He was not at all given permanency . This itself is very much unfair on the part of the respondent. The height of unfairness is in terminating him without following principle of first come last go and retaining the seniors in the service by terminatingjunior if needed. No notice was given to the Petitioner or notice pay was not also given . In fact , he had completed 240 days in every year for 8 years continuously still his services were not regularized and the management continued to take the work from him as a contingent labour. Finally on 8-5-1984 he was kicked out without any enquiry, without any notice and without payment of any retrenchment compensation though he was entitled for all the above benefits and formalities . Despite it the respondent claims that his termination was legal . I fail to understand how the management supporting its termination. It is in fact a arbitrary act of the management .

Again by filing additional WS it has made more submissions . The management has submitted that the Central Ground Water Board is a department under the Ministry of Water Resources and its employees are governed under CCS (CC&A) Rules and they are paid from the consolidated funds from the Government of India . They are categorized as Group A, B, C and D. Considering the nature of activity of Respondent, it is not an industry . Hence, according to it on this ground only the reference needs to be dismissed.

Further, it has also contended that the performance ofthe Petitioner was unsatisfactory. He participated in illegal strike, abused civil servant in office premises during office time.Earlier he was found guilty of stealing the Government properties from the office . The Petitioner was arrested and charged under Section 135 of Bombay Police Act . The competent authority was found him unsuitable to continue further. Thus according to it, the Party No. 2 is not industry and the claim deserved to be dismissed and accordingly it hasprayed for the same .

By filing an additional statement, stand has been taken as it is not an industry as it is a department under the Ministry of Water Resources under Government of India . The employees of the Central Ground Water Board are governed under CCS ( CC& A) Rules and are paid from the consolidated funds at Government of India and categorized asGroup A, B , C & D. The Board is mainly carrying out scientific studies for development of the ground water resources . The entire activities of the Board which is subordinate department in the Ministry of Water Resources is a non- industrial and the Board is not an Industry . It seems that though it is of a Central Government Department, it is an Industry within the meaning of Sub- section J of Industrial Disputes Act 1947 because the industry includes calling of the employer and calling service employment , handicraft or industrial occupation or avocation of the workman . The meaning of industry is wide enough to cover the management i.e. Party No. 2. In my view, the respondent is an industry and the Industrial Dispute Act is applicable to it . Since the services of the Petitioner are terminated without following due procedure , we have to be declared as illegal . It is not precedent by an enquiry . Respondent No. 2 is claiming that he was no more required by Party No. 2 because his performance was not found satisfactory and not found suitable for the Government work . The management has given in notes of argument some of the examples ofhis mis-conduct. Ifthe Petitioner had committed any mis-conduct , it was necessary to initiate enquiry and after a domestic enquiry terminate his services . Since he was engaged after sponsoring from the Employment Exchange on permanent post , it was necessary to award permanency on him . His unsatisfactory performance or unfavourable confidential reports has no relevance with awarding permanency . Moreover, his junior were continued retrench and again taken in the service avoiding the Petitioner though he was senior. This definitely amounts to unfair labour practice . The respondent has filed the Heard the counsel for the Petitioner and the management has filed written notes of argument . Undisputedly, the Petitioner was engaged as a contingent worker w.e.f. 5-6-1976 after sponsoring from employment exchange. He continuously worked till the termination i.e. on 8-5-1984 . There is no dispute that he was in continuous service for near about 8 years and the management terminated his services without notice , without enquiry and without payment of any compensation. According to the management, he being a contingent labour as his record was not good, his service were terminated. The question is whether the termination is illegal and proper . One more point has been raised by the Petitioner that his junior were continued in the service . They were retrenched and again taken in the service . These facts are also undisputed on behalf of the management and its reply is that since the Petitioner was not having a good confidential remark, he was not called again . Undisputedly, Shri Kahar and Shri Wase who arejunior to the Petitioner are still working with the respondent management . The services of all the persons at least at the time of filing of the claim were not 3359 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13, 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

Present: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur , Prèsiding Officer

Dated the 16thday ofFebruary, 2009

Industrial Dispute L.C.I.D. No. 129/2006 seniority list which supports the contention of the Petitioner. The evidence of the Petitioner and documents filedby him clearly establishes that he was entitled forthe permanency as well as seniority among the contingent labour. At the time of retrenchment, it was necessary to pay the retrenchment compensation as necessary under the provision of Section 25 (F) and 25 (H) of Industrial Disputes Act 1947. As it was not paid and the proper procedure was not followed, his termination will have to declare as illegal and accordingly I declare it as illegal.

BETWEEN

....Petitioner

Sri Ch . Ashok Kumar , S/o Ch. Govindu , R/oH. No. 12-1-389, Lalapet, Secunderabad-500017

AND

Since his termination is illegal , the natural. consequences follow that he will have to be treated in the service. Similarly, he would also be entitled for the back wages. However, there is no specific evidence to show that the Petitioner had no source of income and he was actually not performing any work. In my view, 50% back wages from the date of his termination shouldbe paid to him. I pass the following Order.

ORDER

1.The Secretary,

1. The management is directed to reinstate the Petitioner if he has not completed the age of superannuation.

M/o Finance, Govt . of India, D/o Economic Affairs , New Delhi- 110011 .

2. It shall regularize his services in the lowest cadre from the date ofhis termination till the superannuation or for the further period of his remaining service within a month from the date ofpublication ofAward.

..Respondents

2. The General Manager, India Government Mint, IDA Phase II , Cherlapally, Hyderabad

Date: 07-05-2009.

APPEARANCES

A. N. YADAV, PresidingOfficer

Forthe Petitioner

नई दिल्ली, 22 मई, 2009

M/s . C. Vijaya Shekar Reddy, G.SrinivasaReddy, Y. Ranjeeth Reddy and S. Vijay Venkatesh, Advocates .

For the Respondent : M/s. P. Ravinder Reddy and M. Mallikarjun , Advocates .

AWARD

का.आ. 1689.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडिया गवर्नमेन्ट मिंट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 129/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-05-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-16025/3/2009- आई.आर. ( डी.यू. ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी

Thisis a case taken under Sec . 2A (2) ofthe I.D. Act, 1947 in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court ofAndhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of1989 dated 3-8-1995 between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/s . Cotton Corporation ofIndia and two others .

New Delhi , the 22nd May,2009

2.The Petitioner filed his claim statement stating that after undergoing a thorough selection procedure he was appointed as a Quality Control Assistant vide order dated 3/8-7-2003 . Later he was terminated from service vide order dated 1-6-04 by 2nd Respondent and he prays to direct the Respondent for his reinstatement .

S.O. 1689. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref: No. 129/ 2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of India Government Mint and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 22-05-2009.

[No. L- 16025/3 /2009- IR(DU)]

3. Acounter was filed by the Respondents denying the averments made by the Petitioner . It is submitted that the Petitioner was appointed as Quality Control Assistant w.e.f. 10-7-2003 (FN ) for a period of one year. It is further SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

2061Q4/09-19 3360

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

submitted that as the appointment ofthe Petitioner is purely on ad hoc basis , his services were terminated w.e.f. 1-6-2004. Hence, the petition be dismissed.

4. On 16-2-2009 Petitioner has not attended his case , while Respondent's counsel is present. The case is fixed for Petitioner's evidence but none is present from the side ofthe Petitioner and no memo for adjournment is filed , as such, case is closed. Hence , Nil Award is passed in absence ofevidence .

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected by me on this the 16th day of April,2009.

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Respondent

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

नई दिल्ली , 22 मई , 2009

का.आ. 1690.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार कमांडिंग ऑफिसर , आईएनएस , वीरबाहू के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 114/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-05-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -14012/ 18/2004-आई.आर. (डी.यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 22nd May, 2009

S.O. 1690.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 114/ 2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofCommanding Officer, INS Virbahu and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on22-05-2009.

[No. L- 14012/ 18/2004- IR(DU ) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM -LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

Present: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer Dated the 27th day ofApril, 2009

Industrial Dispute No. 114/2004

BETWEEN

SriM.Jangamaiah ,

D.No. 71-31-1701 Kakaralova,

Jaindhra Colony, Gandhigram (Post) ,

Visakhapatnam-530005

....Petitioner AND

The Commanding Officer ,

INS Virbahu , Naval Base (PO) ,

Visakhapatnam -530014

...Respondents APPEARANCES

For the Petitioner : M/ s. S. Rama Rao and D.J.Murthy, Advocates .

For the Respondent Sri D. Ramesh , Advocate AWARD

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L - 14012/ 18 /2004 - IR ( DU) dated 24-8-2004 referred the following dispute under section 10( 1 ) ( d) of the I.D. Act , 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of INS Virbahu and their workman . The reference is ,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of INS Virbahu , Visakhapatnam in terminating the services of Sh . M. Jangamaiah , Ex - helper in the Unit Run Canteen with effect from 11-3-2003 is legal and/or justified ? If not , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled ?"

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 114/2004 and notices issued to the parties .

2. After receipt of this reference , workman Sri M. Jangamaiah , submitted his claim statement stating therein that he was initially appointed as helper in the Unit Run Canteen at Virbahu during the year 1978 on consolidated pay of Rs . 150 p.m. Since then the Petitioner was working as helper to the entire satisfaction of his superiors . His monthly salary was subsequently raised to Rs.450 p.m. after completion of 3 years of service and there after his salary was increased to Rs.700 p.m. till the date of his regular appointment , i.e. , on 1-6-2001 . Thereafter he was drawing a monthly salary of Rs.2550 in the said post . The Petitioner was placed under probation for one year while giving regular appointment certain terms and 3361

भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

conditions applicable to the Petitioner was handed over to him . He was not employed as regular worker or as central government employee . But he was employed as casual worker and he was paid Rs . 2550 p.m. , as honorarium since 1-6-2001 . On 11-2-2003 the Petitioner requested the officer in charge , unit run canteen for termination of his service on medical grounds due to old age and ill -health. Medical opinion was also sought and the medical officer advised Petitioner for sedentary duties due to ill- health . Due to his old age and illness he was not able to do the required job as helper , which demands lifting a heavy packages and such other physical work . The request of Petitioner was considered and he was granted his request . It has been further stated by the Respondent that from the attendance register it is evident that Petitioner was absent for 8 days in January, 2003 and 9 days in February , 2003 out of 11 days . Subsequently his services were terminated on 11-2-2003 as requested by him and at the time of termination of his services the security deposit of Rs.5000 and balance of wages were paid to him . It has further been submitted that Petitioner has otherwise attained the age of superannuation . He is now of 65 years of age and accepted the terms of appointment, he is liable for the superannuation at the age of 58 years . As such his claim, is fit to be dismissed and he is entitled for no relief.

4. Parties have been directed to file their respective evidences . Petitioner has filed appointment letter Ex . W1 , letter of Respondent dated 11-3-2003 Ex.W2 , Petitioner's representation dated 21-5-2003. is Ex.W3 , Minutes of conciliation proceedings dated 19-11-2003 is Ex . W4, and letter dated 19-11-2003 issued by the Labour Enforcement Officer(C ) to the Respondent is Ex.W5 . Again letter dated 5-12-2003 by Labour Enforcement Officer (C) to Respondent is Ex. W6 . Staff minutes sheet dated 20-12-2001 is Ex . W7. Workman has filed his affidavit as his examination in chief and presented himself for cross examination and has been cross examined by the Respondent management .

conditions were fixed according to the condition of the service and Petitioner was required to deposit a sum of Rs.5000 towards security deposit with the officer incharge of the canteen organization and the said amount has to be returned on retirement of the Petitioner . Accordingly the Petitioner deposited the said amount with Andhra Bank, INS Virbahu Extension branch . The Petitioner was directed to undergo medical examination which was carried on 20-12-2001 in the Civilian Services of the Respondent Organization and after medical examination the Petitioner was found fit for permanent appointment and appointment letter was issued by the Respondent management on 17-1-2002 and the services of the Petitioner was confirmed. While doing so during the month of February , 2003 the Petitioner requested Respondent management for grant of loan of Rs.3000 in connection with the construction of his house . The concerned official of the Respondent had taken signature of the Petitioner on the pretext of granting loan and arranged a sum of Rs.5000 which the Petitioner thought that it was the loan sanctioned by the Respondent . But to his shock and surprise the Respondent organization issued letter No.411/01 /URC dated 11-3-2003 as if the Petitioner resigned to his post on health grounds vide letter dated 14-2-2003 and the Respondent permitted the Petitioner to resign from the post w.e.f. 11-3-2003 as requested and the same has been alleged to have been accepted w.e.f. 11-3-2003 . This act of Respondent demonstrates the evil mind of the one of Respondent Subordinate management namely Mr. P.M. Yadav who harassed the Petitioner and troubled the Petitioner for personal reasons . The Petitioner stated that he has never resigned from his post on the health ground as he is hale and healthy . The above said official has hatched a plan to send the Petitioner from the organization. Petitioner made several representations to put him back in the service but the Respondent has not permitted the Petitioner to resume his duties , then the Petitioner approached Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) who held conciliation proceeding which ended in failure and finally the matter was referred to the Government of India which has referred the dispute to this tribunal. The Petitioner has requested that he is only 53 years of age , he has not resigned from the post as such the action of the management in accepting the resignation from 4-2-2003 be declared as illegal and Petitioner be ordered to be reinstated in the post .

5.The Respondent management has filed affidavit of Sri B.N. Yadav , Petty Officer cum Medical Assistant in INHS Asvini at Mumbai as MW1 and presented him for cross examination . Respondent as further filed affidavit of Surgeon Lt. Commander Sri Kamal Mishra as MW2 and has presented him for his cross examination and he has been cross examined by the Petitioner . Respondent management has filed xerox copy of Rules regulating the terms and conditions of the services of Civil employees of unit run canteen dated 28-4-2003 . Copy of the terms and conditions dated 14-9-2001 , Memo dated 10-2-2003 for unauthorized absence from duty, memo dated 6-1-2003. for unauthorized absence from duty and memo dated 9-12-2004 for unauthorized absence from duty. Copy of 3. The management has filed counter statement wherein the management has stated that the Petitioner was employed as helper w.e.f. 1-1-2001 in the unit run canteen which run by non public fund of this establishment . The canteen is run for the welfare of defence service personnel for their convenience . At the time of employment the copy of the terms and 3362

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009 /JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii )] resignation letter of Mr. M. Jangamaiah , Ex.M 1 medical certificate given by SurgeonLt. Commander Kamal Mishra and receipt of security deposit by the Petitioner and certificate of the receipt of the dues dated 11-3-2003 .

Mishra, Lt. Commander Surgeon who examined and the Petitioner and advised for sedentary work. It has been argued by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that Petitioner never submitted his resignation letter but Petitioner has nowhere challenged that the alleged letter of resignation does not bear his signature or it is not in the handwriting of the Petitioner. Moreover , the Petitioner himself has issued a receipt of receiving Rs.5,000/ - security deposit received and other dues and issued a ' no dues certificate ' dated 11-3-2003 , which is on this record. The Petitioner has not been taken the courage to challenge this receipt and his signature and handwriting on this receipt . MWI Sri B.N. Yadav , Petty Officer has appeared before this Court for cross examination who had stated that the Petitioner submitted resignation . The Petitioner has suggested that the signature on the resignation letter was obtained by misrepresentation . This means , the resignation letter bears the signature of the Petitioner . Thus , the signature of the Petitioner on the resignation letter coupled with the no dues certificate issued by the Petitioner and ill - health certificate issued by Sri Kamal Mishra proves that the Petitioner was suffering from Bronchial Asthma and Hypertension and he was not fit to perform heavy physical work , thereby he submitted his resignation letter and the management after sending him for medical examination considered the medical report , accepted the resignation letter of the Petitioner . Thereby the management has not committed any illegality or irregularity in accepting the resignation of the Petitioner and relieving him from the duties . Thus , the action of the management of INS Virbahu , Visakhapatnam in terminating the services of Sri M.

Jangamaiah w.e.f. 11-3-2003 is legal and justified .

7. The Petitioner himself has admitted in his cross examination that he had attained the age of 58 years . No doubt , the Petitioner has denied that he has attained age of 65 years but looking to his ill - health and growing age of the retirement the action of the management is fully justified . Petitioner is not entitled for any relief. Hence , this award .

Award passed accordingly . Transmit .

Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant , transcribed by her , corrected and pronounced by me on this the 27th day of April , 2009.

VED PRAKASH GAUR, PresidingOfficer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for theRespondent

WWI: Sri M. Jangamaiah MW1 : Sri B.N. Yadav MW2 : Sri Kamal Mishra 6. I have heard Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and have gone through the pleadings and evidence adduced before this court. It is not disputed between the parties that the Petitioner was appointed as a regular employee of the unit run canteen w.e.f. 1-1- 2001. It is also not disputed between the parties that the Petitioner was relieved from the duty on 11-3-2003 . The industrial dispute is that Petitioner claimed that he did not submit any resignation letter on 11-2-2003 whereas the Respondent management alleges that Petitioner has submitted his resignation letter on the ground of ill -health and thereby he was asked to undergo medical checkup and after receiving the medical report his request was accepted by the management . The Respondent management has filed copy of the resignation letter of the Petitioner workman and the medical certificate which is issued by the Surgeon Lt. Commander Mr. Kamal Mishra , MW1 who has presented himself before this court for his cross examination by the Petitioner . MW2 , Mr. Kamal Mishra has stated that he examined Mr. M. Jangamaiah who was of age 65 years when he was suffering from Bronchial Asthma and Hyper Tension and he advised him for sedentary duties . This proves that the workman and present Petitioner was examined by MW2 Mr. Kamal Mishra, who certified that the present Petitioner was suffering from Bronchial Asthma and Hyper Tension . He advised for sedentary duties meaning thereby that the Petitioner was not fit to perform heavy works . It is also evident from the own resignation letter of the Petitioner that he requested the management to relieve him from the duty because he was medically unfit and unable to perform heavy physical work. This fact has been substantiated by Mr. B.N. Yadav , Petty Officer of then INS Veerbahu , who was Officer Incharge of the Unit Run Canteen . No doubt , Mr. B.N. Yadav has stated during his cross examination that Ex . W7 was certificate issued by Mr. V.R.G. Patnaik , Surgeon Commander certified the Petitioner is fit to permanent appointment. This certificate relates to the year 2001 when the Petitioner was appointed on regular basis . Had the Petitioner been found fit in the year 2001 it is not necessary that he would remain fit in the year 2003 also. In the year 2003 and on 10-3-2003 the Petitioner was again examined by Lt. Commander Mr. Kamal Mishra of INS Veerbahu, the Petitioner workman was suffering from Bronchial Ashthma and Hyper Tension . This certificate has not been challenged by the Petitioner . He has not claimed or as alleged animosity against Sri Kamal 3363

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13, 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

AND

Documents marked for the Petitioner

Ex.W1 : Copy of appointment Ir . Dt.17-1-2002

...Respondents

TheGeneralManager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. , Vijayawada

Ex.W2: Copy of Ir . Dt.11-3-2003 issued by Respondent

APPEARANCES

Ex.W3 : Copy of representation dt.21-5-2003 addressed to ALC ( C ), Visakhapatnam

For the Petitioner

Ex.W4: Copy of Minutes of conciliation dt.8-7-2003

: M/s K. Ajay Kumar , Sudha and M. Govind, Advocates.

Ex.W5 : Copy of Ir. Dt . 19-11-2003 issued by the LEO(C) to Respondent

Forthe Respondent : Sri Karoor Mohan, Advocate AWARD

Ex.W6: Copy of Ir. Dt . 5-12-2003 issued by the LEO(C) to Respondent

Ex.W7: Copy of Staff Minutes Sheet dt.20-12-2001 of the Respondent

Documentsmarked for the Respondent

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L-40012/ 37 /2005 - IR(DU) dated 11-8-2005 referred the following dispute under section 10( 1 )(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal betweenthe management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. , and their workman . The reference is,-

Ex.M1 : Copy of medical case sheet of Petitionerdt . 10-3-2003

SCHEDULE

नई दिल्ली, 22 मई , 2009

"Whether the action of the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. , Vijayawada in dismissing services of Smt . B. Padma, Ex - casual Labour is justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to?"

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 59/2005 and notices were issued to the parties .

का.आ. 1691. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 59/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-05-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

2. For several adjournments including today, i.e. 12-2-2009, both parties called absent . Petitioner has not filed claim statement even after more than three years . As such, Nil Award is passed in absence of claim statement . Transmit .

[सं. एल -40012/37/2005- आईआर ( डी.यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 22nd May, 2009

Dictatedto Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 12th day of February, 2009.

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Respondent

NIL

S.O. 1691. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 59/2004) ofthe CentralGovernment Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofBharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on22-05-2009.

Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL

[No. L-40012/37/2005 - IR(DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

Documentsmarked for the Respondent NIL

ANNEXURE

नई दिल्ली , 22 मई, 2009

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

Present: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer Datedthe 12thday of February, 2009 Industrial Dispute No. 59/2005

BETWEEN

SmtB. Padma,

का.आ. 1692. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 58/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-05-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/36/2005- आईआर(डीयू) ] C/o P. Appa Rao Reddy, NUBSNLW (FNTO), No. 252, Labour Colony, Vidyadharapuram,

...Petitioner

सुरेन्द्रसिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी Vijayawada-12 3366

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

filed awrit petition before the Hon 'ble High Court ofA.P. and Hon'ble High Court of A.P. on 3-12-99 has passed an order that the Petitioner be reengaged in service as a fresh face, in the light of this order of the Hon'ble High Court ofA.P. , the Petitioner was reengaged in 11-2-2000 . As such, the claim of the Petitioner for regularization w.e.f. 1-2-2000 is neither possible nor it is factual in position because on 1-2-2000 the Petitioner was not in the service of the Respondent . The Learned Counsel for the Respondent has drawn the attention of this court towards the statement of the Petitioner wherein the Petitioner has stated that order of the Hon ble High Court of A.P. dated 3-12-99 is final order , that is the copy of the judgement in WP No. 22598/99 , leading to fresh engagement, wherein Hon'bleHigh Court of A.P. , has ordered that the Petitioner be reengaged as fresh face for all purposes , thereby leaving no scope to reckon the earlier period as claimed by him for purpose of regularization of the Petitioners . The Hon'bleHigh Court of A.P. , has ordered that regularization shall depend upon the future exigency, any scheme to be launched by the management depending upon the suitability of the workmen. The Petitioner has not been able to prove that he was not reengaged in the light of the order passed by the Hon'ble High Court of A.P. , on 8-2-2000. The Petitioner himself has filed judgement of Hon'ble High Court of A.P. , which proves that the Petitionerwas engaged as a fresh face on 11-2-2000 under Respondent's management. He has not filed any scheme launched by management for regularization . Thus , the date ofentry of the Petitioner is 11-2-2000 . As such the claim ofPetitioner to be regularized w.e.f. 1-2-2000 is unfounded and baseless and misconceived.

6. I have considered arguments of both the parties and have also gone through the statement of Petitioner and the documents filed by him. From the own submission of the Petitioner it is fully proved that the Petitioner was engaged as a fresh face on 11-2-2000 . Thus , the claim of Petitioner for regularization w.e.f. 1-2-2000 is neither factual nor he is entitled for regularization with effect from the date when he was not in the service . There is no material placedby the Petitioner of this case on the file of thisTribunal to prove that any casual mazdoor junior to the Petitioner has been regularized by the Respondent management leaving Petitioner alone for the regularization or for promotion .

7.The documents filed by the Respondent i.e. , Ex.M11 that is the order of the Hon'ble High Court of A.P. is very material regarding regularization of the Petitioner's services in the Respondent management, because the Hon'ble High Court of A.P. , has directed that the regularization of the Petitioners shall depend on the future exigencies , any scheme to be launched by the management and the suitability of the workmen . The Petitioner of this case has not been able to prove or place any material before this tribunal that the management has launched any scheme of the regularization , for the services of the casual mazdoors . As such , unless there is a scheme launched by the management for regularization of the services of the Petitioner, the services of the Petitioner can not be regularized on the basis of the claim put forward by the Petitioner.

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 8. From the above discussion , this Tribunal has come to the conclusion , that Petitioner's claim for the regularization is based on misconceived and incorrect facts or misleading facts and is not entitled for regularization w.e.f. 1-2-2000 as claimed by him . In the result, it is held, that the action of the management of M/s. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited in not regularizing the services of Sri K. Bhagwan Reddy , Petitioner w.e.f. 1-2-2000 is justified. He is not entitled for the relief claimed byhim.

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 25th day of March , 2009.

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Respondent

WWI: Sri K. Sathi Reddy MWI : Sri B. Narsinga Rao

MW2: Sri M. Venkata Swamy Documents marked for the Petitioner Ex.WI: Copy of ir . No.E-G-46/Vol . XII/02-03/ 12 dt.5-9-2002 Ex.W2 : Copy of Ir. No.El - ID A Pay scales/04-05/ 19 dt . 21-5-04

Ex.W3: Copy of letter TA/ SDB/20-2 /Corr /kw/99 / 82 Dt . 20-11-2000

Ex.W4: Copy of Ir . No.269-94/90-511.11 (PER.VI) dt.4-1-01 Ex.W5: Copy of Lr . No.E -6-60/ IV /TSM /2001-02/ 111 dt . 3-5-01

Ex.W6: Copy of Lr . No. TA/STB/20-2/Genl/2001dt.19-6-2001 Documents marked for the Respondent Ex.Ml: Copy of order of Hon'ble High Court of A.P. dt.22-11-2000

Ex.M2: Copy of Ir.269-94/98 - STN Dt.29-9-2000 reg . Regularization of casual labourers .

Ex.M3 : Copy of Ir.269-4 /93 - STN - II (Pt .) Dt. 12-2-99 reg . Ban on casual labourers engagement Ex.M4: Copy of Ir . No. 269-4/93 -STN - II (Pt .) Dt. 15-6-1999 reg. Ban on casual labourers engagement .

Ex.M5 : Copy of Ir . No.270/6/ 84- STN dt . 30-3-1985 reg . Casual labourers engagement .

Ex.M6: Copy of Ir . No. 15w/C.L./ 89-90 dt . 17-7-1990 reg . Verification of days of casual labourers Ex.M7: Copy of Ir. dt.7-11-89 reg. Temporary status to casual labourers .

Copy of Enquiry report

Ex.M8:

Ex.M9: Copy of reference orderdt . 5-3-2004

Ex.M10: Copy of order of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India dt. 2-1-95

Ex.M11 : Copy of order of Hon'ble High Court of A.P. dt 27-3-2006 भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 22 मई , 2009

का.आ. 1694. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947.( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 9/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [फा. सं. एल-40012/54/2006- आईआर ( डी.यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्रसिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 22ndMay, 2009 S.O. 1694.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 9/2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited their workman, which was received by the Central Government on22-5-2009.

[F. No. L-40012/54/2006- IR (D.U.) ] URENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

Present : Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer Dated the 10th day of February, 2009 Industrial Dispute No. 9/2007

BETWEEN

SriN.Gopal,

....... Petitioner S/o Sri Pochaiah , H.No. 1-9-16/19, Ramnagar (MedBavi Basti), Hyderabad.

AND

The Chief General Manager Telecom,

M/s.Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Andhra Pradesh Circle, Door Sanchar Bhawan, Abids , Nampally Station Road,

......Respondent Hyderabad-500001.

APPEARANCES

Forthe Petitioner: Nil

For the Respondent : Sri Karoor Mohan, Advocate 2061 G1/09-20

3367

AWARD

TheGovernment of India Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-40012/ 54/ 2006- IR (D.U. ) dated 5-01-2007 referred the following dispute under Section 10 (1 )(d ) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of M/s . Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and their workman . The reference is ,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Chief GeneralManager , Telecom, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited A.P. Circle, Hyderabad (AP) in terminating the services of their workman Shri N. Gopal S /o Sri Pochaiah, w.e.f. 30-11-2004 is legal and justified? If not, to what reliefthe workman is entitled?"

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 13/2007 and notices were issued to the parties .

2. On 10-2-2009 Petitioner called absent while Respondent's counsel is present. Petitioner has not filed claim statement as yet . About two years are going to be passed, but Petitioner is not taking any interest to pursue the matter , as such, Nil Award is passed in absence of claim statement . Transmit.

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 10th day of February , 2009.

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for theRespondent Witnesses examined for thePetitioner

Nil

Documents marked for the Petitioner

Nil Documents marked for the Respondent Nil

नई दिल्ली , 22 मई, 2009

का.आ. 1695-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल पोटेटो रिसर्च इंस्टिट्यूट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 189/97) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[फा. सं. एल-42012/168/96- आईआर (डी.यू. ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी 3368

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

New Delhi , the 22nd May, 2009 S.O. 1695. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.189/97) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court No. 1, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the IndustrialDispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Potato Research Institute andtheir. workmen, which was received by the Central Government on22-5-2009.

[F. No. L-42012/ 168 /96- IR (DU) ]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT-1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D. 189/97

Shri Ranjit Singh , S/o Shri Ram Sarup , Bagria House, Servant Quarter, Chhota, Shimla(HP).

........Applicant

Versus

The Director, Central Potato Research Institute , Shimla.

..Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the workman : Sri R. P. Rana

For the management : Sri Amit Sharma

AWARD

Passed on 18-5-09

The Government of India vide Notification No. L-42012/ 168/96- IR ( DU ) dated 27-10-97 referred the following industrial dispute for judicial adjudication to thisTribunal :

" Whether the action of the management of Central Potato Research Institute , Shimla Represented the Director in awarding punishment of removal from service on Shri Ranjit Singh, Grade- I (Safaiwala) w.e.f. 16-4-1996 is just and legal ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ?"

After receiving the reference both of the parties were informed. Both of the parties appeared. Workman Late Shri Ranjit Singh filed his statement of claim and management ofrespondent has filed his written statement. Both of the parties were also afforded the opportunity for filing evidence oral and documentary. Before cross- examination, the workman died and his legal representatives were brought

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] on record. Thereafter , parties were further given the opportunity of being heard and for adducing evidence. From the ordersheet it is evident that after receiving the file of enquiry report and enquiry proceedings , this Tribunal fixed the case for hearing on fairness of enquiry. It is hereby made clear that workman was removed from the services of his inaction to work by making unauthorized absence not only once but several time . The management after conducting the enquiry removed the workman from the services on contention that the charges of unauthorized absence and indiscipline were well proved against him The workman filed the appeal which was dismissed . Thereafter , the workman raised an industrial dispute and on account of failure of conciliation reports , thisreference .

2 Asstated earlier, after receiving the file of enquiry proceedings including the enquiry report parties were heard on genuineness of enquiry . Order dated 16-4-2009 reveals that learned counsel for the workman conceded the enquiry tobe fair , reasonable , proper and genuine. Thereafter vide above order dated 16-4-2009 , opportunity for adducing evidence on perversity of decision making by enquiry officer, if any, and quantum of punishment was afforded. No oral evidence was adduced but it was contended by both of the parties that rest part of this reference be answered on the basis of the documentary evidence .

Partieswereheard . It is contended by learned counsel for the legal representatives of the workman that considering the gravity of charges the punishment provided is not proportionate and it may give a cause to thisTribunal to invoke the jurisdiction under Section 11A ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , for diluting the punishment. It isfurther contended by the learned counsel for the legal representatives of the workman that as the workman is no more if the Court is considering the punishment not in proportionate to the committed misconduct, a reasonable compensation be awarded to the legal representatives of the workman . The learned counsel for the management has argued that considering the gravity and nature of misconduct there is no occasion for this Tribunal to invoke thejurisdiction under Section 11A ofthe Industrial Disputes Act.

Y I have gone through the entire enquiry proceedings and enquiry report . I have also gone through the letters written to the workman by the management and the letters written by the Incharge of the workman to the senior authorities regarding work and conduct of the workman . I havealso perused the applications moved by the workman for ex-post facto sanction of leaves . The cumulative effect ofthese letters and applications is that the workman was in habit of unauthorized absent . Sometimes after getting the leave for one day he absented for couple of months and on another occasion even without applying for leave he absented for several months . He was in the habit to apply the leave for ex-post facto sanction.

3369

भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

NewDelhi , the 22ndMay, 2009

S.O. 1696.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the İndustrial Disputes Act, 1947. ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.78/2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court, Chennai, as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Posts and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 22-5-2009.

[F. No. L-40011 /44/2007 - IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

Theworkman was posted against a post for a specific work. Ifthe presence ofthe workman was not required there was no necessity for creation of post . Necessity of work is directly relatedwith creation of post and appointment . The inaction of the workman disturbed the entire scheme and made the management in jeo parde on several occasions . There was no result of warning on the workman for his preceding leave with proper sanction . The harassment of the management by the act of the workman is reflected by several communication made by Incharge of the workman to senior authorities which are on record. The presence of workmanwas for smooth functioning of the department in which he was appointed. If by in action of the workman smooth functioning is disturbed the law cannot permit the Court for any sympathy. In action and laxity should be severally dealt with .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Monday, the 18th May, 2009

Present: A. N. Janardanan , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 78/2007

In the matter ofthe dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 ofthe IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), between the Management of Post Offices and their workman ]

BETWEEN

Sri G. Veerasamy

No. 3/393 , Sivan Sannathi Street

Valakkarai

Melavalakkarai PO

Thiruvarur Distt .

Petitioner

Tamil Nadu-610204

AND

The Superintendent of Post Offices

Department of Posts

Nagapattinam Division,

...... Respondent

Nagapattinam Distt-611001 .

APPEARANCE

Workman was a permanent employee . On unauthorized absent of the workman, it was not possible for the management to carry out the work of the workman by some other persons . The work to which the workman was appointed was of great importance. Without proper cleaning ofthe office we cannot imagine hygiene and healthy working conditions . By his unauthorized absent the workman disturbed these hygienic and proper working conditions of the office . Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, permits this Tribunal to interfere in the punishment of removal and termination. But it is the well establishedprinciple of service jurisdiction thatjurisdiction under section 11A should be invoke rarely only in the cases resulting in glaring in justice to the workman . Whether there is clear injustice to the workman is to be assessed, whether the punishment provided to the workman is in proportionate to the committed misconduct . If the punishment is in proportionate to the committed misconduct no interference onsympathy, antipathy or such other facts can be made in the punishment awarded by the prescribed authority. As stated earlier, the punishment provided is proportionate to the committed misconduct and no interference under Section 11A is required. The reference is answered accordingly. Let the Central Government be informed and thereafter, file be consigned.

Forthe Petitioner : M/s. S. Jothivani

G. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

For the Management : Smt . Kanimozhi

नई दिल्ली , 22 मई , 2009

AWARD

का.आ. 1696. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947

TheCentral Government ,Ministry of Labour vide order No. L-40011 /44/2007 - IR (DU) dated27-11-2007 has referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .

The schedule mentioned in that order is :

का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डाक विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 78/2007 को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[फा. सं. एल-40011/44/2007- आईआर (डीयू) ]

"Whether the action of the Management of Superintendent of Post Offices , Nagapattinam in terminating the services of their workman Sri G.Veerasamy, w.e.f. 28-02-2004 is legal andjustified ? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled to ? " सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी 3370

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 13 , 2009 / JYAISTHA 23. 1931

2. After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as 78/2007 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their Advocates and filed their Claim and Counter Statement respectively.

3. Brieffacts ofthe case of the Claimant are as follows:

The petitioner, an ED Postmaster at Melavazhakarai Post Office was charge sheeted on 1-11-2003 by the Superintendent of Post Offices , Nagapattinam under charges that he failed to account Rs . 600 , Rs . 550 and Rs. 350 accepted from the depositor of SB Account No. 496338 respectively on 20-11-2002, 22-11-2002 and 3-11-2003 . Similarly failed in respect ofRs . 250 collected from G. Mallika , RD A/c holder with No. 975013 on 29-11-2002 , Rs.350 collected from RD A/c holder, Indira withNo. 976115 on 28-12-2002 and further a sum of Rs . 153 from RD A/ c holder K. Subbaiah with No. 976114 on 6-09-2002. The petitioner thus lost integrity and devotion toduty required of him under Rule - 21 Gramin Dak Sevaks (C& E) Rules, 2001. Copies ofdocuments were not furnished to the petitioner violating the principles of natural justice . There was an influence from the Enquiry Officer upon him to admit the charge unconditionally and that if so and he would be let off with a warning . He bonafide believed and accepted charges , thus . Thus , the Enquiry Officer holding the charges as proved brought about the impungned punishment ofremoval from service on 28-02-2004 . Appeal preferred was rejected on 07-07-2004 . So too the revision was rejected on 30-09-2004. The documents were obtained behind the back of the petitioner . The same resulted in ineffective defence being raised in the explanation. The right to engage a Defence Assistant not being infromed, he was prejudiced in the conduct ofthe enquiry . If a denovo enquiry is allowed, the petitioner can prove his innocence. The punishment of removal from sevice resulted in his economic and civil death. It is harsh . There is no application of mind in the finding . He prays for reinstatement with concomitant service and monetary benefits .

4 In the Counter Statement, following contentions areraised:

On account of the lapses of the petitioner, he was placed under off duty from 07-03-2003 . Later he credited the entire amounts defrauded. The delinquent proceeded against under Rule- 10 of Gramin Dak Sevaks ( Conduct & Employment) , Rules , 2001 under Memo dated 01-11-2003 , admitted the charges by reply dated 05-12-2003 . An enquiry was held and in the enquiry report dated 23-01-2004, the factum of the delinquent having admitted the charges without reservation was intimated . The charge was concluded proved and copy of report was sent to the delinquent. In the reply dated 16-02-2004 , charges were further admitted and leniency was prayed for . The petitioner had previously misappropriated RD deposit amount and was debarred from recruitment as Postman for

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 3 years on 30-05-2001 . There was no need of engagement of a Defence Assistant since petioner admitted charges through his representation dated 05-12-2003 and in the deposition given before the Enquiry Officer , The petitioner did not mend his lapses even after the first minor punishment but was continuing the same. There is no need for denovo enquiry. His claim is to be dismissed

5. The Points for consdideration are:

(i) Whether the removal from service of the petitioner by the Management is legal and justified?

(ii) In not, to what relief the petitioner is entitiled ? Point No. 1

1 6. After the filing of the Counter Statement, the Respondent thereafter continued to be absent and eventually he was called abesent and set ex- parte . The petitioner filed affidavit in lieu of Examination in chiefto prove his case . Heard petitioner's counsel .

7. In this reference apart from filing the Counter Statement, no documents have been produced from the Respondent's side . At the fag end when the ID was being posted from time to time for the purpose, Respondent continuously remained absent and he has been set ex- parte . The evidence let in by the petitioner by way of affidavit in lieu of Chief Examination is now only the evidentiary material , the veracity of which does not stand tested with the touchstone of a cross - examination . In proof ofthe case of the petitioner , there is only the sworn affidavit of the petitoner against which there is no evidentiary material from the side of the Respondent in rebuttal . That is to say there is only one - sided evidence adduced by the petitioner, if the uncontroverted materials sworn to in the affidavit may properly be characterized as evidence at all . The case of the petitoner is that the Respondent was prevailing upon him to obtain his acceptance of the charges unconditionally and thereby the Enquiry Officer contrived to fish out his admission fo the charges . According to him, the enquiry is not proper nor the documents were served to him by way of copies which were obtained on his back and that the enquiry is against the principles of natural jusice. The case of the Respondent is that the petitioner was unconditionally admitting the guilt and signing the defence representation and there was no need for the appointment of any Defence Assistant and proceeding with the enquiry further. Actually no enquiry was held and the petitioner was being proceeded against on accepting the charges made by him with no reservation . Since the evidence adduced by the petitioner is only his sworn testimony by way of affidavit and no other, the petitioner cannot be said to have proved his case as pleaded by him. The judicial pronouncements are to the effect that affidavits being only self- serving evidence are not enough to prove the case of the deponent. Affidavit may be accepted as 3371

भारत का राजपत्र: जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23 , 1931.

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 10/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[फा. सं. एल-42011/ 117/2007 - आईआर (डीयू) ] सुरेन्द्रसिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 22ndMay, 2009

S.O. 1697. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 10/2008) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour CourtHyderabad, as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of National Seeds Corporation Ltd. and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on22-5-2009.

[F. No. L-42011/ 117/2007- IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

Present: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer

Dated the 2nd day ofFebruary, 2009

Industrial Dispute No. 10/2008 sufficient proof when the Respondent in spite of after having come to know about that has chosen not to cross- examine the deponent thereafter indicating a case of acceptance of the contents. In this case the Respondent has been continuously absent and therefore has not been aware of the contents of the affidavit . The mere fact that they have therefore not come forward to challenge the veracity of the statements sworn to in the affidavit is not automatically to be taken as a case of no challenge to find that the case of the petitioner is to be held proved. Since evidence by affidavit cannot be a substantive proof for matters averred therein, it being only a self-serving evidence merely acting upon the same an order in favour of the petitioner cannot be sustained. The case ofthe Respondent as pleaded is that the petitioner had been guilty previously with minor misconducts whereupon he was debarred from recruitment as Postman of3 years . Still he has not directed himself to correct or mend his lapses and therefore the petitioner is not entitlted to any relief. Though pleading has not crystallized into evidence ofthe Respondent merely with the self- serving nature of evidence tendered by the petitioner , he cannot be found to have succeeded in proving his claim . The petitioner has admittedly accepted the charges unconditionally. It is held by High Court that in such cases holding enquiry is only empty formality. Therefore, his contentions being not substantiated, he cannot be given any of the reliefs prayed for . It is only to be found that the order of his removal from service is legal and justified. So found.

BETWEEN

releif. 8. Resultantly, the petitoner is not entitled to any

9. The reference is answered accordingly.

Sri D.T.V. Rama Krishna Reddy , CITU Office, 2/7, Brodiepet, Guntur

Petitioner

AND

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him, corrected and prounounced by me in the open court on this day the 25th April, 2008).

A.N. JANARDANAN, Presiding Officer

Witness Examined:

1. The Regional Manager , National Seeds Corporation Ltd. , TukaramGate, Lalaguda, Secunderabad

None

Forthe 1st Party/Petitoner

None

For the 2nd Party/Management :

Documents Marked on the petitioner's side

2. The Area Manager , National Seeds Corporation Ltd. , Auto Nagar, Guntur

Respondent

Description

Ex.No. Date

APPEARANCES

Nil

Forthe Petitioner : Nil

On the Management's side

Forthe Respondent : Nil

Description

Ex.No. Date

AWARD

Nil

नई दिल्ली, 22 मई, 2009

का.आ. 1697. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947

का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार नेशनल सीड्स कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide its order No. L-42011 /117/2007 - IR (D.U.) dated 29-2-2008 has referred the following dispute under Section 10( 1 )(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal betweenthe management of National Seeds Corporation Ltd. , and their workmen . The reference is , 3372

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JUNE 13 , 2009/ JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

SCHEDULE

"Whether the demand of the National Seeds CorporationWorkers Union for extending the benefit of weightage @ Rs . 4/- for first year and subsequentaly @ Rs. 5/ - after completion of every five years , for Shri A. Samrajyam and 72 other workers , as per annexure , at par with other 15 workers , who have receivedthese benefit, is legal and justified ? If yes, to what relief the workmen are entitled to and from which date? "

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 10/2008 and notices were issued to the parties.

2.On 2-2-2009 both parties called absent . Petitioner has not filed claim statement even after seeking time to file the same. As such, Nil Award is passed in absence ofclaim statement . Transmit .

Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 2nds day of February, 2009.

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Nil

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

Nil

Documents marked for the Petitioner

Nil

Documents marked for the Respondent

Nil

नई दिल्ली , 22 मई , 2009

का.आ. 1698.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ न्यायालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 37/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-5-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [फा. सं. एल-40012/212/2002- आईआर (डी.यू. ) ]

सुरेन्द्रसिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 22nd May, 2009

S.O. 1698. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.37/2003) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure inthe industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 22-5-2009.

[F. No. L-40012/212/ 2002 - IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT HYDERABAD

Present: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer

Dated the 24th day of February, 2009

Industrial Dispute No. 37/2003

BETWEEN

Sri P. Lingaiah,

S/o Sri Narasaiah ,

Telephone Exchange, 7-237,

Kindi Basti , Medchai -501401 .

....... Petitioner AND

2 The Sub Divisional Officer ,

Telecom, Telephone Exchange ,

Medchal , Ranga Reddy District .

......Respondent APPEARANCES

For the Petitioner : Sri S. Lakshma Reddy, Advocate For the Respondent : M/s Ch . Yadava Reddy & S. Prabhakar Reddy, Advocates AWARD

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-40012/ 212 /2002 - IR ( D.U.) dated 26-2-2003/ 5-3-2003 referred the following dispute under Section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of Telecom and their workman . The reference is,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Department of Telecom having its Telephone exchange at Medchal in Andhra Pradesh in terminating the services of Sh . P. Lingaiah , Ex. Watchman is fair, legal and justified? If not , to what relief the Ex - workman is entitled for?"

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 37/2003 and notices issued to the parties.

2. The Petitioner filed claim statement stating that he hasjoined as casual labourer on 1-9-92 as a watchman in Telephone Exchange , Medchal . It is further submitted that he continuously worked till his oral termination dated 1-8-1998 . He prayed to direct the Respondent to reinstate the Petitioner and regularize his services with all consequential benefits .

3. Counter filed by the Respondent denying the averments made in the claim statement . It is submitted that the Petitioner was engaged intermittently on ACG- 17 which is an expenditure voucher used for accounts purpose and 3373

भारत का राजपत्र : जून 13 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 23, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

New Delhi , the22nd May, 2009 instances like this does not constitute employer-employee relationship , as such, the question of termination does not arise . It is further submitted that the Petitioner continued to work under M/s . Bombay Securities and not under the Respondent. Hence, the petition be dismissed.

S.O. 1699.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.46/ 2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation tothe management Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and their workman,which was receivedby the Central Government on22-5-2009 .

4. Parties were directed to produce their respective evidences . Petitioner filed his chief examination affidavit reiterating the facts mentioned in the claim statement. He marked documents Ex . W1 to W7 . He presented himselffor cross -examination .

[F. No. L-40012/ 179/2004- IR (D.U. ) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

5. On 24-2-2009 , Petitioner called absent while Respondent's counsel is present . Order sheet transpires that Petitioner is not attending to this case for last two years. In absence of Petitioner or his witness evidence is closed. Hence , Nil Award passed. Transmit.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT ATHYDERABAD

Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on thisthe 24th day of February , 2009.

Present: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur , Presiding Officer VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer

Dated the 12th day of February, 2009 Appendix of evidence

Industrial Dispute No. 46/2005 Witnesses examined for the

BETWEEN

Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL

Sri K. Shiva Reddy,

WW1: Sri P. Lingaiah

C/o Shri P. Appa Rao Reddy, District

Documents marked for the Petitioner

Ex. W1 : Copy of failure of conciliation report dt . 28-2-02

Secretary, NUBSNLW (FNTO), No. 252, Labour Colony, Vidyadharapuram,

Vijayawada. ....... Petitioner Ex. W2: Copy ofrepresentation to the GM. telecom dt. 13-5-04

AND

Ex. W3 : Copies of WW1's co - worker's affidavits .

TheGeneral Manager

Ex. W4 : Copy ofD.G. Telecom Circular dt . 7-2-86

Respondent

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. , Vijayawada.

Ex. W5 : Copy ofDOT letter No. 10-13/87-Ratesdt . 8/9- 12/1976

APPEARANCES

Ex.W6: Copy of notification of M/o labour dt. 8/9-12-1976

Forthe Petitioner : M/s. A. Raghu Kumar & B. Pavan Kumar , Advocates Ex. W7: Copy of circular by D/o Telecomdt . 29-2-2000

Documents marked for the Respondent

For the Respondent : Sri M. Shankar Narayan , Advocate

NIL

AWARD

नई दिल्ली , 22 मई , 2009

TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-40012/ 179 /2004- IR (D.U. ) dated 3-5-2005 referredthe following dispute under Section 10( 1 )(d ) ofthe I.D.Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management ofM/ s. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and their workman. The reference is ,

SCHEDULE

का. आ. 1699. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 46/2005 ) प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 22-5-2009 को प्राप्त था।

[फा. सं. एल-40012/179/2004- आई.आर. (डी.यू. ) ]

"Whether the action of the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. , Vijayawada in-dismissing services of Sri K. Shiva Reddy, Ex-casual Labour is justified? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled to?"

सुरेन्द्रसिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी 3374

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JUNE 13 , 2009/JYAISTHA 23 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

their evidence is closed . Hence, Nil Award is passed in absence of evidence . Transmit .

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 46/2005 and notices were issued to the parties.

Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by me on this the 12th day of February, 2009 .

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer

Appendix ofevidence

2. The Petitioner filed claim statement stating that he was initially engaged as casual labourer on 1-7-1992 on muster rolls of the Asst . Engineer , External E - 10B till 30-7-1995 . He was engaged at various offices upto 31-3-2000 and his services were terminated w.e.f. 1-4-2000 without any notice and prayed to direct the Respondent to grant temporary status and regularization of services .

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for

theRespondent

Petitoner NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner 3. Counter was filed. The Respondent denied the averments made in the petition and also denied that the Petitioner was engaged under Respondent . Hence, the petitionbe dismissed.

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

4. On 12-2-2009, when case called out for Petitioner's evidence, both parties called absent and parties are not attending to this case for more than two years . As such ,

Printed by the Manager , Govt . of India Press , Ring Road , Mayapuri . New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications . Delhi - 110054