This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

REGD.NO.D.L. (N) 04/0007/2003-05 रजिस्ट्री सं० डी० एल० ( एन) 04/0007/2003-05

भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 27]

No. 27]

नई दिल्ली, जून 28 जुलाई 4, 2009 , शनिवार/ आषाढ़ 7-आषाढ़ 13 , 1931 NEW DELHI, JUNE 28-JULY 4, 2009, SATURDAY/ASADHA 7-ASADHA 13, 1931

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate Pagingis given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II- खण्ड 3 - उप-खण्ड ( ii) PART II Section 3-Sub-section(ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries ofthe Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE विधि एवं न्याय मंत्रालय

(Legislative Department)

(विधायीविभाग)

New Delhi , the 18th June, 2009

नई दिल्ली, 18 जून , 2009

S.O. 1820.-In pursuance of sub - section (2) of Section5 oftheRight to Information Act, 2005 (22 of2005), and in supersession of the notification of the Legislative Department ofthe Ministry ofLaw and Justice, published intheGazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II , Section 3 , sub-section( ii) , vide number S.O. 1175 ( E) dated the 19th May, 2008, except as respects thing done or omitted tobe donebefore such supersession, the Lagislative Department herebydesignates Shri K. Sreemannarayana , Assistant Legislative Counsel in the said Department, as the Central Assistant Public Information Officer for the said Department for the purposes of the said Act with immediate effect.

का.आ. 1820. सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, 2005 (2005 का 22 ) की धारा 5 की उपधारा ( 2 ) के अनुसरण में और भारत के राजपत्र, असाधारण , भाग II , खण्ड -3 , उपखण्ड ( ii ) में का. आ. 1175 ( ई ) दिनांक 19 मई, 2008 के अंतर्गत प्रकाशित विधि एवंन्याय मंत्रालय, विधायी विभाग की अधिसूचना के अधिक्रमण में, ऐसे अधिक्रमणों से पहले तत्संबंधी ऐसे कृत या किए जाने के लिए छोड़े हुए कृत्यों को छोड़कर, विधायी विभाग द्वारा उक्त विभाग में श्री के. श्रीमन्नारायण , सहायक विधायी परामर्शी को इस विभाग के लिए उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनार्थ तत्काल प्रभाव से एतद्वारा केन्द्रीय सहायक लोक सूचना अधिकारी पदनामित किया जाता है. ।

[F. No. A-45011/4/2005 -Admn. I (LD) ] [फा. सं. ए, 45011 /4/2005 - प्रशा. 1 ( वि.वि. ) ]

V. G MANGAL, Under Secy.

वी. जी. मंगल , अवर सचिव

2287 G1/2009

(3763) 3764

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JULY 4,30MASABHA 13 , 1931

नई दिल्ली, 18 जून , 2009

का.आ. 1821.-सूचना का अधिकार निमन , 2005 ( ii ) में (2005 का 22 ) की धारा 5 की उपधारा (2 ) के अनुसरण में औ भारत के रामपुत्र, मस्समभाग -3 का. आ. 832 (ई ) दिनांक 252009 एवं न्याय मंत्रालय , विभागको अपिल में, ऐसे अधिक्रमणों से पहले ही ऐसे या किए जाने के लिए छोड़े हुए कृत्यों को कोदार विधानमारा उक्त विभाग में श्री रामासेट्टी श्रीनिवास , उपविधीपरासी को इस विभाग के लिए उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनार्थ वाफार प्रमाण से एम‌द्वारा कोन्द्रीय लोक सूचना अधिकारी पद‌नामित किया जाता है ।

[फा. सं. ए-45011/4/2005- प्रशा.1(कि.मि. ) वी. जी. मंगल , अबर सचिन NewDelhi, the 18th June, 2009

S.O. 1821. In pursuance of sub -section (2) of Section 5 oftheRightto Information Act, 2005 (22 of2005), and in supersession of the notification of the Legislative Department of theMinistry of Law and Justion, published intheGazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, sub- section ( ii ) , vide mumber 3.0. 832 (E) dated the 25th March, 2009, except as respects thing done or orsittedto be done before such supersession, the Lagistative Department hereby designates Shri Ramasetty Srinivas , DeputyLegislative Counsel in the said Departament, as the Central Public Information Officer for the said Departament forthe purposes ofthe said Act with immediate effect.

[F. No. A-45011/4/2005 -Adran. I (LD) ]

V.G MANGAL, Under Secy.

कार्मिक, लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय (कार्मिक और फ्रीक्ष

नई दिल्ली, 25 जून, 2009

का.आ. 1822. केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द‌द्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम नं. 25 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उन निम्नलिखित अपराधों को विनिदिष्ट करती है जिनका अन्वेषण दिल्ली मिलेम पुलिस स्थापना द्वारा किया जाना है, नामत्: -

(क) तमिलनाडु सम्पदा ( क्षति एवं हानि निषेध ) अधिनियम, 1992 की धारा 3 और 5 के अधीन कभी अपराध; और

(ख) उपर्युक्त अपराधों से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्नों, दुष्प्रेरणों और षड़यंत्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्द्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध अथवा अपराधों।

[सं. 228/10/2009- एवीडी- II ] चंद्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव

[PART II-SEC.3 ( ii) ]

EK , PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND MINIONS

Pepartment ofPersoned and Training) New Delhi, the 25th Jma, 2009

5.0. 1038-In marcies ofthe powers conferredby Section 3 ofthe Deli Special Police Bushment Act, 1906(Act No. 28of 1946), the Central Government hereby specifies the following offences which are to be imenighted by the Delhi Sponjal Police Establishment (a) Offences punishable under sections 3 and 5 of theTamilnadu Propaty(Provention ofDamage and Lose)Act, 1992; and

(b) Attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relationto or in connection with one ormore ofthe offncos mentioned above and any other offence or offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same

[Νο. 228/10/2009 -AVD-II] CHANDRA PRAKASH, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 25 जूत , 2009

वार , 1023, क्षेत्रीय सरकार द्वारा दिल्ली विशेष सस्थान 1946 ( 1946 यत अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की RAKADABક(F)DARA21SAMARH-89A. संविधानों मोनो हुनपुर सरकार गृह विभाग , इम्फाल की दिनांक 28 मई , 2009 की अधिसूचना सं. 12/1 ( 26)/09 - एच. (निपलेनिन ) से पुलिस स्टेशन सिंगजनेई ( मणिपुर) में सरिक, 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 302, 120- बी तथा 123 तथा अवैध गतिविधियां ( निवारण ) संसोधन 2004 ( 2004 का अधिनियम सं. 29 ) की धारा 16, 18 राम 20 कपास अधिनियम 1959 ( 1959 का अधिनियम सं. 54 ) को सोनं. 109 ( 5 ) :09 जो कि प्रोफेसर मोहम्मद नेकपा सरकारने दुष्प्रेरणों तथा षड्यंत्रों और के में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उत्कल्पना करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष शिकेसों की मतों और अधिकारिता का

[सं. 228/25/2009- एवीडी- II ] जंद्र प्रकाश , अगर सच्चिष NewDelli, the25th June,2009

5.0. 1800.--In exercise ofthe powers conferredby sub-section ( 1) of Section 5, read with section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Butablishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), Brand Gevement with the consent oftheState Govamment of Manipur, Home Department, Imphal vide Notification No. 12/1 (26)09-H(misc .) dated 28-5-2009, hereby entends the powers and jurisdiction ofthe members 3765 भारत का

1009/13 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड (ii)]

ti Gazettedofficerofthe Government , tobe estate officer for the purposes ofthe said Act madmad saidsaid offeofficer shall exercise the powers conferred and perform the on theEstateOfficer by or under the saidAct withi the loca limits of the respective jurisdiction in res promises specified in column (2) of said table:-

Pa of

Designation ofthe Officer

(2)

(1)

oftheDelhi Special Police Establishment to the wholeof the State ofManipur for the investigation of FIR No. 109(5)09under sections 302, 120-B and 123 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) and Sections 16, 18 and20 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)Amendment Act,2004(Act No. 29 of2004) and Section 25( 1 -B) ofthe Arms Act, 1959 (Act No. 54 of 1959) registered at Police Station Singjamei (Manipur) relating to the killing ofProf. Md. Islamuddin and attempts , abetinents and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with the offences mentioned above and any other offence or offences committed in the course ofthe same transaction or arising out of the same facts.

Deputy Inspector

General ofPolice

Promises of land and assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Force at Latur in

Group Contre, Contral

[No.228/25/2009-AVD- II] CHANDRA PRAKASH, Under Secy.

the State ofMakaran.

Reserve Police Force,

Pune (Maharashtra)

[P.No.A-18-14/ 2008-09- Adm- 1( Lam )-MHA -PF- II ] गृह मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 12 जून , 2009

APART AND PİLKAM SUANTHANG Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 12 मूत्र, 2009

का.आ. 1824.-सरकारी स्थान अधिकृत अधिभोगियों की बेदखली ) अधिनियम, 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्‌वारा नीचे सारणी के कालम ( 1 ) में वर्णित अधिकारी को सरकार के राजपत्रित अधिकारी के समकक्ष होने के नाते कथित सारणी के कालम ( 2 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट क्षेत्राधिकार की स्थानीय सीमा के अंदर उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनार्थ सम्पदा अधिकारी नियुक्त करती है और निर्देश देती है कि उक्त अधिकारी कथित अधिनियम के अंतर्गत अथवा उसके द्वारा सम्पदा अधिकारी को प्ररत समितयों का प्रयोग करेगा तथा सौंपे गए कर्तव्यों का निर्वहन करेगा ।

النمل

अधिकारी का पदनाम

लोक परिसरी और क्षेत्राधिकार की स्थानीय सीपार

(1)

महाराष्ट्र राज्य को साहूर में कोन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपतिः ।

पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल , पुणे (महाराष्ट्र)

[फा. संए, - II- 14/2008-09- प्रशा -1 ( लातूर) -गृह

मंत्रालय-पौएफ- III ]

एच. काम सुभलबंग, अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

New Delhi , the 12th June, 2009

कार.आर. 1825. सरकारी स्थान अधिकृत अभिभोगियों की मेरी ) अभिनित 1971 ( 1971 कार 40 ) की बारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए तथा भारत सरकार दिनांक 24/27 अक्टूबर , 1978 के क... II - 2/75/78 ( प्रशा. ) /III/ केरिपुस्तकर्षिक दिनांक 19-09-1993 के H- 10/93-प्रशा. -1/ मोरिपुक्त ,गृह मंत्रीक 4-9-2008 केए, II- 7/2008- प्रशा. - 1 ( गुरमंत्रालय/पीएफ- III , दिनांक 29-9-2000 के प्र I - 16/99-1- फेरिपुबल गृह मंत्रालय पीएफ- III , दिनांक 27-7-1994 केएⅡ-8/93 - प्रा -1/फेरिपुबल/गृह मंत्रालय फेरफ- IV, दिनांक 28-6-2007 के ए. II- 3/2006-प्रशा. -I/( अगरतला )/केरिपुबल गृह मंत्रालय पीएफ दिनांक 26-5-1998 के ए, II/-16/97- प्रसा.- I/ श्रीनगर ) मेरिल मंत्रालय/पीएफ- दिनांक 29-6-2006 के ए. I - 1 /2006- प्रसा. 1 -फेरिपुमल/ गृह मंत्रालय/ पीएफ- III , दिनांक 1-5-2007 के ए, II - 2/2007-प्रता. I/ (टीपीर,ओएल ) गृह मंत्रालय पीएफ दिनांक 19-9-2007 के ए. II - 14/98-2007-प्रशा / ईएस) रिगृह मंत्रालय/ पीएफ- III , दिनांक 13-4-1992 केए 11-10/92-प्रसा3/ फेरिपुबल /गृह मंत्रालय/पीएफ- IV तथा दिनांक 8-2-2007 के द H-1 /2007-प्रशा. I/ (दोषा)/फेरिपुबल/गृह मंत्रालय/पीएफ- III की अधिसूचनाओं के अधिक्रमण में इस प्रकार के अधिक्रमण से पूर्व कृत कायों अथवा सम्मा करने के गरका कोनार केन्द्रीय सरकार एवारी पीने सारणी भी कान (2) धर्गत अधिकारियों को सरकार के राजपत्रित अधिकारी होने के पापमित सारणी के कालम (3 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट अपने क्षेत्राधिकार की स्थानीय सीमा के अंदर उक्त अधिनियम को प्रोन सम्परी नियुष्य करती है और निर्देश देती है कि उपर्व अधिकारी कथित अधिनियम के अंतर्गत अथवा उसको द्वारा सम्मा अधिकारी को प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करेगा तथा सौंपे गए कर्णव्यों का निर्वहन करेगा ।

S.O. 1824. In exercise of the powers conferredby Section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction ofUnauthorized Occupants)Act, 1971 (40 of 1971 ), the Central Govemment herebyappoints the Officer mentioned in column ( 1) of the Table below, being the officer equivalent to the rank of a 3766

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

सारणी

अधिकारी का पदनाम

क्रम सं

लोक परिसरों और क्षेत्राधिकार की स्थानीय सीमाएं (1) (2)

(3)

आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य के हैदराबाद में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति ।

पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल , हैदराबाद (आंध्र प्रदेश )

तमिलनाडु राज्य के आबडी में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति । पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल, आवडी (तमिलनाडु)

मध्य प्रदेश राज्य के नीमच में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति । पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल , नीमच (मध्य प्रदेश)

केरल राज्य के पल्लीपुरम में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति । पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्ष पुलिस बल , पल्लीपुरम (केरल)

महाराष्ट्र राज्य के नागपुर में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति । पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल, नागपुर (महाराष्ट्र)

बिहार राज्य के मोकामाघाट में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का धूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति । पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल, मोकामाबाट (बिहार)

पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य के दुर्गापुर में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति ।

पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल, दुर्गापुर (पश्चिम बंगाल)

उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य के रामपुर में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति । पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बलं , रामपुर (उत्तर प्रदेश )

जम्मू व कश्मीर राज्य के जम्मू में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति। पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्व * पुलिस बल, जम्मू (जम्मूव कश्मीर)

पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल, नई दिल्ली

राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र के नई दिल्ली में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति ।

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] (1)

(2)

(3)

राजस्थान राज्य के अजमेर में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति । पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्ष पुलिस बल, अजमेर (राजस्थान)

गुजरात राज्य के गांधीनगर में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति । पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल , गांधीनगर (गुजरात)

उड़ीसा राज्य के भुबनेश्वर में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति । पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल , भुबनेश्वर (उड़ीसा)

मणिपुर राज्य के इम्फाल में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति । पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्ष पुलिस बल , इम्फाल (मणिपुर)

असम राज्य के गुवाहाटी में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति । पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल, गुवाहाटी (असम)

हरियाणा राज्य के पिंजौर में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति । पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल , पिंजौर (हरियाणा)

पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्ण पुलिस बल , गुड़गांव (हरियाणा)

हरियाणा राज्य के ग्राम कादरपुर (सोहना) गुड़गांव में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति ।

आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य के रंगारेड्डी में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल काभूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति ।

पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल, रंगारेड्डी (आंध्र प्रदेश)

कर्नाटक राज्य के बंगलोर में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति । पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल , बंगलोर (कर्नाटक)

पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल , अगरतला (त्रिपुरा)

त्रिपुरा राज्य के अगरतला में अदरनी इस्टेट तथा उषा बाजार काम्पलेक्स हेतु केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति । 3767 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

(1) (2)

(3)

*असम राज्य के खटखटी में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति ।

पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिसबल, खटखटी (असम)

dated 13-4-1992and A- II - 1/2007-Adm.I (Digha)/CRPF/ MHA/PF- III dated 8-2-2007 except as respect things done or omitted tobe done before such supersession, the Central Government hereby appoints the Officers mentioned in column(2) ofthe Table below,being Gazetted officers of theGovernment to be Estate Officers for the proposes of the saidAct who shall exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties imposed on the Estate Officer by or under the saidAct within the local limits oftheir respective jurisdiction in respect of the public premises specified in column (3) ofthe said table:---

TABLE

जम्मूव कश्मीर राज्य के रामबाग श्रीनगर में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति।

पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक ग्रुप केन्द्र केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल, श्रीनगर (जम्मूव कश्मीर)

S.No. Designation ofthe Officer

Publicpremises and local limits ofjurisdiction.

(3)

(1) (2)

त्रिपुरा राज्य के रत्तागेराम बैखोरा , लिम्बूचेरा तथा सालबागान में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति ।

पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक (संभरण व लेखा)

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Force at Hyderabad in the State of Andhra Pradesh

Deputy Inspector General ofPoliceGroup Centre, Central Reserve PoliceForce, Hyderabad(Andhra Pradesh)

पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य के सेक्टर III, IV व V साल्ट लेक, 47 स्ट्रेंड रोड और राजार हाट, न्यू टाउन, कोलकाता में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति ।

केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल पूर्वी सेक्टर मुख्यालय, कोलकाता ( पश्चिम बंगाल)

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Force at Avadi in the State of TamilNadu

Deputy Inspector General of PoliceGroup Centre, CentralReserve PoliceForce, Avadi (Tamil Nadu)

मेघालय राज्य के स्टोनी हेवन काम्पलेक्स शिलांग में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति ।

पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक (प्रशासन) केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल पूर्वोत्तर सेक्टर मुख्यालय , शिलांग ( मेघालय)

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Force at Neemuch in the State of Madhya Pradesh

Deputy Inspector General ofPoliceGroup Centre, Central Reserve PoliceForce,Neemuch (Madhya Pradesh)

बिहार राज्य के दीघा , पटना में केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल का भूमि परिसर तथा परिसंपत्ति ।

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Force at Pallipuramin theState of Kerala

Deputy Inspector General ofPoliceGroup Centre, Central Reserve PoliceForce, Pallipuram (Kerala)

पटना (बिहार) पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक (संभरण व लेखा) केन्द्रीय रिजर्व पुलिस बल बिहार सेक्टर मुख्यालय ,

[फा. सं. ए, - II- 18 /2008-09-प्रशा. -1/गृह मंत्रालय-पीएफ- III ]

एच. काम सुआनथंग, अवर सचिव

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Force at Nagpur in the State of Maharashtra

Deputy Inspector General ofPoliceGroup Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Nagpur (Maharashtra)

New Delhi, the 12thJune,2009

S.O. 1825. In exercise ofthe powers conterredby

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central Mokamohghat in the State ofBihar Reserve Police Force at

Deputy Inspector General ofPoliceGroup PoliceForce, Mokamohghat (Bihar) Centre, Central Reserve

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Force at Durgapur in the State of WestBengal

Deputy Inspector General ofPoliceGroup Centre, CentralReserve Police Force, Durgapur (WestBengal)

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Force at Rampur in the State of UttarPradesh

Deputy Inspector General ofPoliceGroup Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Rampur (UttarPradesh)

Section 3 ofthe Public Premises (Eviction ofUnauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971) and in supersessions of the notifications of the Government of India vide SO No. A.II - 2/75/78(ADM)/III/CRPF/Pers . II dated 24/27 Oct. 1978, A- II - 10/93 -Adm.I/CRPF.MHA/PF- IV dated 19-9-1993 , Α.Π- 7/2008-Adm.I (GGN)/CRPF./MHA/PF.III dated 4-9-2008 . A.II - 16/99-Adm.I/CRPF . MHA/PF - III dated 29-9-2000.A- II-8/93 -Adm.I/CRPF / MHA/ PF - IV dated 27-7-1994,А-П-3/ 2006-Adm.I (AGT)/CRPF / MHA/PF- III dated 28-6-2007, A.II - 16/97-Adm.I (SNR)/CRPF/MHA/PF - IV dated 26-5- 1998, Α- Ⅱ- 1/2006-Adm.I ( SNR)/CRPF/MHA/PF - III dated 29-6-2006, A-II-2/2007-Adm.I (TPAOL)//MHA/PF- III dated 1-5-2007, Α- Π- 14/98-2007-Adm.I (ES)/CRPF /MHA/PF -III dated 19-9-2007, A- II- 10/92-Adm.3 /CRPF/MHA/PF - IV 3768

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 200WABADHA 13 , 1931

(1 ) . (2)

(3)

Deputy Inspector General ofPoliceGroup Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Janunu (Jammu and Kashmir)

Premises of land assets Reserve Police Force at belonging to the Central Jammu in the Stateof Jaenatu and Kasmunir Deputy Inspector General of PoliceGroup Centre, Central Reserve PoliceForce, New Delhi.

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central ReservePolice Forceat New Delhi in the National Capital ofTerritory of Delhi

Premises ofland assets belonging to the Contral Reserve Police Force at Ajmer in the State of Rajasthan.

Deputy Inspector Generalof PoliceGroup Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Ajmer (Rajasthan)

Deputy Inspector General of PoliceGroup Centre, Central Reserve PoliceForce, Gandhinagar(Gujarat)

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Force at Gandhinagar in the State of Gujarat

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central ReservePolice Force at Blubnerwar in the State ofOrissa

Deputy Inspector GeneralofPoliceGroup Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Bhubneswar(Orissa)

Promises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Force at Imphal in the State of Manipur

Deputy Inspector GeneralofPolice Group Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Imphal (Manipur)

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Forceat Guwahati in the State of Assam

Deputy Inspector General of PoliceGroup Centre, Central Reserve Police Force,Guwahati (Assam)

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Force at Pinjore in the State of Haryana

Deputy Inspector General of PoliceGroup Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Pinjore (Haryana)

Deputy Inspector General ofPoliceGroup Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Gurgaon (Haryana)

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Forceat Gurgaon in the State of Haryana

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Forceat Rangareddy in the State ofAndhra Pradesh Deputy Inspector General ofPoliceGroup Centre, Central Reserve PoliceForce, Rangareddy (Andhra Pradesh)

[PART II-SBC. 3 (ii) ]

(3)

(1) (2)

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Forceat Banglore in the State of Karnataka

Deputy Inspector General of PoliceGroup Centre, Contral Reserve Police Force,Banglore (Karmetaka)

Deputy Inspector Gemand ofPoliceGroup Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Agartala (Tripura)

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Force for Adarai Estates and Usha Bazar Complex at Agartala in the State of Tripura

Assam Premises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Forceat Khatkhati in the State of Deputy Inspector Gemaal ofPoliceGroup Cesare, Central Reserve Police Force, Khatishati (Assam)

Premises of land assets ReservePolice Force at Srinagar in the State of belonging to the Central Jammu and Kashmir Deputy Inspector General ofPoliceGroup Castre, Central Reserve Police Force, Srinagar (J& K)

Deputy Inspector General of PoliceGroup Centre, Central Reserve Police Force,Agartala

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Force at Ratingerum Baikhora, Limbuchera and Salbagan in the State of Tripura

Deputy Inspector GeneralofPolice (Provision and Accounts), Central Reserve Force, Eastern SectorHQrs. (Kolkata)

Prensises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Force at Sector-III , IVand V, Salt Lake, 47 Strand Road and Rajarhat, New Town, Kolkata in the State of WestBengal.

Deputy Inspector General ofPolice (Administration) , Cantail Roserve Ferce, NRS, H.Qur . Stultong (Meghalaya)

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Force at Stony Heaven Complex, Shillong inthe State of Meghalaya

Premises of land assets belonging to the Central Reserve Police Force at Digha, patna in the State ofBihar.

Deputy Inspector Genanti of Police (Provision and Accounts), Contral Busuve Force, Bihar SauterHQrs . Patasa

[F. No.A- II - 18/08-09- Adm- I/ MHA - PF- III ] H. KAM SUANTHANG, Under Secy.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3769

भारत का रामपतन : बुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त का कार्यालय त्रिची, 12 जून , 2009

आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10( 23सी ) (vi) के अधीन अनुमोदन

का.आ. 1826.-आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 सी ) के उप खंड ( vi ) के साथ पठित आयकर नियम , 1962 के 2 सीए द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उपरोक्त उप खंड में बताए गए प्रयोजनों के लिए निर्धारण वर्ष 2009-2010 से सेंट जोनस् एजुकेशनल ट्रस्ट, जंगलहल्ली , बी. पल्लीप‌ट्टी पोस्ट, पापिरेड्‌डीपट्टी तालुक , धर्मपुरी जिला को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अनुसार अनुमोदन दिया जाता है :

2 ( i ) निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम की धारा 1961 की धारा 10 के खंड ( 23 सी ) के उप खंड ( vi ) के साथ पठित आयकर नियम, 1962 के 2 सीए के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अनुपालन करेगी । (ii ) अधिनियम 10(23सी ) के तीसरे परन्तुक के खंड (अ) से अपेक्षित यह निर्धारिती अपनी आय का उन उद्देश्योंके लिए , पूर्णतः और अमन्यतः उपयोग करती है या उपयोग करने के लिए संचयम करती है:और यदि उसकी आय का पंद्रह प्रतिशत या उससे अधिक का संचयन हो जाता है वहां उसके आय के संचयन की अवधि किसी भी दशा में पांच वर्ष से अधिक नहीं होगीं ।

(iii ) अधिनियम 10( 23 सी ) के तीसरे परन्तुक के खखंड (ब ) से अपेक्षित तथा धारा 11 की उप- धारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट एक या अधिक रूपों या पद्धतियों में किसी भी अवधि के लिए यह निर्धारिती अपनी निधि से अम्बथा निवेशों और निक्षेपों (आभूषण एवं फर्नीचर या ऐसी वस्तु के रूप में प्राप्त और रखे गए स्वैच्छिक अभिदाय के अलावा ) में नहीं करेगी ।

(iv) यह अनुमोदन किसी ऐसी आय के लिए लागू नहीं होगा जो निर्धारिती द्वारा कारोवार, व्यापार से प्राप्फ होती है या कारोबार या व्यापार से अर्जित आप का प्रयोग या प्रतिधारण ऐसे कार्यों की सेवा में प्रदान किया गया है ।

(v) अधिनियम की धारा 10(23सी ) के दसवें परन्तुक के अनुसार यह निर्धारिती अपनी बहियां लेखा परीक्षित कराएगी और अधिनियम की धारा 139 (4सी ) के अनुसरण में नियमित तौर पर लेख्स परीक्षा की रिपोर्ट के साथ विकरणी फाइल करेगी ।

(vi ) न्यास के भंग होने पर उसके अधिशेष एवं आस्तियां ऐसे संगठन को दी जाएंगी जो पूर्णतः शैक्षिक प्रयोजनों के लिए है और लाभ के प्रयोजनार्थ नहीं हैं औ अधिनियम की धारा 13 ( 3 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट अनुसार उसका कोई भी भाग प्रत्यक्ष या अप्रत्यक्ष रूप से निर्धारिती के हिताधिकारी या अन्य किसी को नहीं जाएगा ।

(vii) अधिनियम 10( 23सी ) के पंद्रहवें परन्तुक तथा धारा 115 बीबीसी के साथ पठित यह अनुमोदन अनाम संदानो के लिए लागू नहीं होगा

3. उपराक्त अनुमोदन अधोहस्ताक्षरी द्वारा वापस ले लिया मामा जाएगा , यदि अधिनियम की धारा 10 (23 सी ) के तेरहवें परन्तुक के अनुसरण में नहीं है तथा उसकी गतिविधियां असली या प्रमाणिक नहींहैं या गतिविधियां स्वीकृत अनुमोदन में उल्लिखित सभी या किंहीं शतों के अनुसार नहीं की जा रहीं हैं ।

[सी. सं. 935(4) /मु.आ./त्रिची/2008-09 ] कमला कांत त्रिपाठी, मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त (Income-TaxDepartment)

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Trichy, the 12th June, 2009

Approval Under Section 10(23C) (vi) ofthe nestyinIncome Tax Act, 1961

S.O. 1826. In exercise ofthe powers conferredby sub-clause(vi ) ofclause (23C) of section 10 of the Income- taxAct, 1961 (43 of1961) read with rule 2CA ofthe Income- tax Rules , 1962, the St. Joan's Educational Trust, Jangalahalli , B. Pallipatti Post, Pappireddipatti Taluk, Dharmapuri District 635301 is hereby approved for the purposes of the said sub -clause, from the assessment year 2009-2010 onwards , subject to the following conditions:-

2. 1) The assessee shall conform to and complywith the provisions of sub -clause (vi) of clause(23C) ofsection 10 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 read with rule 2CA ofthe Income- tax Rules , 1962.

(1) The assessee shall apply its income or accumulate its income for applicationwholly and exclusively for the objects and in a casewhere more than fifteen per cent of its income is accumulated, the period ofaccumulation ofthe same shall in no case exceed five years , as required in clause ( a) of the third proviso to section 10(23C) oftheAct.

(i) The assessee shall not invest or deposit its funds (other than voluntary contributions receivedandmaintained in the forin ofjewellery or furniture) for any period otherwise than in anyoneormore ofthe forms or modes specified in sub-section (5) of section 11 of the Act, as required in clause (b) of the third proviso to section 10(23C) oftheAct.

1 3770

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13, 1931

(iv) This approval shall not apply in relation to any income from any activity in the nature oftrade, commerce or business or rendering of any service inrelation to trade, commerce or business irrespective of the nature of use or application orretention of income from such activity .

(v) The assessee shall get its accounts audited in accordance with the tenth proviso to section 10(23C) of the Act and regularly file its return along with the audit report in accordance with section 139 (4C) oftheAct.

(vi) In the event of dissolution of the society, its surplus and assets shall be given to an organization which exists solely for educational purposes and not for the purposes ofprofit and no part ofthe same shall go directly or indirectly to any of the beneficiaries of the assessee or any body specified in section 13 (3 ) of the Act.

(vii) The approval shall not aply in relation to anonymous donations in terms of the fifteenth proviso to section 10(23C) r.w.s. 115BBC of the Act.

3.The above approval is liable to be withdrawn by the undersigned if it is subsequently found that the activities of the assessee are not genuine or if they are not being carried out in accordance with all or any of the conditions subject to which the aproval is granted, in accordance with the thirteenth proviso to section 10(23C) oftheAct .

[C. No. 935(4)/CCIT/TRY/2008-09] K. K. TRIPATHI , Chief Commissioner of Income-tax कार्यालय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त जयपुर, 10 जून , 2009

सं. 03/2009-10

का.आ. 1827.-आयकर नियम , 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( 1961 का 43 वां) की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 सी ) की उपधारा ( vi ) के द्वारा प्रदतत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त , जयपुर एतद्वारा निर्धारण वर्ष 1999-2000 एवं आगे के लिए कथित धारा के उद्देश्य से " सेन्ट सोल्जर पब्लिक स्कूल , सी -31 , भगवानदास रोड़ , सी- स्कीम, जयपुर " को स्वीकृति देते हैं ।

बशर्ते कि समिप्ति आयकर नियम, 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 के उपखण्ड (23सी) की उपधारा ( vi ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप कार्य करें । [क्रमांक:मुआआआआआ/( मु. )/जय/ 10( 23 सी ) (vi ) 09-10/947 ]

बी. एस. ढिल्लों, मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त

[PART II-SBC. 3 (ii) ] OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Jaipur, the 10th June, 2009 No. 03/2009-10

S.O. 1827. In exercise of the powers conferredby sub-clause (vi ) ofclause (23C) of section 10 ofthe Income- taxAct, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) , read with rule 2CA ofthe Income- taxRules , 1962, the Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Jaipur hereby approves "Saint Soldier Public School, C- 31 , Bhagwandas Road, C- Scheme, Jaipur " for the purpose of said section for the A. Yrs . 1999-2000 & onwards:

Provided that the society conforms to and complies with the provisions of sub-clause (vi) of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Income -tax Act, 1961 read with rule 2CA ofthe Income-tax Rules, 1962 .

[No. CCIT/JPR/Addl.CIT(Hqrs .)/ 10(23C) (vi)/2009- 10/947] B. S. DHILLON, Chief Commissioner ofIncome-tax शुद्धि-पत्र जयपुर , 23 जून, 2009

का.अ. 1828. आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 के खण्ड (23 सी) के उपखण्ड ( vi ) के तहत् अधिसूचना सं. 01/2009-10 दिनांक 13-04-2009 के द्वारा " साहित्य सदावर्त समिति, जयपुर " को स्वीकृति दी गई थी । अधिसूचना के पैरा 1 की लाईन 5 में निर्धारण वर्ष 2001-02 , 2002-03 एवं 2003-04 के स्थान पर " मिर्धारण वर्ष 2001-02 एवं आगे के लिए " पढ़ा जाए । [क्रमांक सुभाभा अभाआ ( मु)/जय/10( 23 सी ) (vi )2009-10/963 ]

बी. एस. ढिल्लों, मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त CORRIGENDUM

Jaipur, the 23rd June, 2009

S.O. 1828.- In Notification No. 01 /2009-10 dated 13-04-2009 videwhich " Sahitya Sadawart Samiti , Jaipur " was approved for the purpose of sub- clause (vi ) of clause (23C) ofSection 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ) readwith rule 2CA of the Income- tax Rules , 1962 , the assessment years in paral , line 6 may be read as ' A. Ys . 2001-02 and onwads ' instead of A. Ys . 2001-02, 2002-03 & 2003-04.

[No.CCIT/JPR/Addl.CIT (Hars .)/10(23C)(vi )/2009-10/963 ] B. S. DHILLON, Chief Commissioner of Income-tax जयपुर, 24 जून , 2009 सं. 04/2009-10

का.अ. 1829.-आयकर नियम , 1962 के नियम 2 सीए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 वां) की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 सी ) की उपधारा ( vi ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त , जयपुर एत‌द्वारा निर्धारण वर्ष 2009-2010 एवं आगे के लिए कथित धारा के उद्देश्य से 3771 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13 , 1931

वित्त मंत्रालय

" महात्मा ज्योतिबा फुले विद्यापीठ समिति, चौमू, जिला- जयपुर " को स्वीकृति देते हैं ।

(राजस्व विभाग)

(केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )

नई दिल्ली, 25 जून , 2009

बशर्ते कि समिति आयकर नियम 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 की धारा 10 के उपखण्ड (23सी) की उपधारा ( vi ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप कार्य करे ।

[क्रमांक:मुआआआआआ/( मु.)/जय/ 10(23सी ) (vi ) 09-10/995 ]

बी. एस. ढिल्लों, मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त Jaipur, the 24th June, 2009

No. 04/2009-10

का.आ. 1831.-सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एत‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग तथा ऽघ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2008 से संगठन महाराष्ट्र एसोसिएशन फार दि कल्टीवेशन ऑफ साइंस, पुणे को निम्नलिखित शतों के अधीन ' वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ ' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थातः-

(i) अनुमोदित " वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ " का एक मात्र उद्देश्य वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करना होगा ;

S.O. 1829.- In exercise of the powers conferredby sub-clause (vi) of clause (23C) ofSection 10 ofthe Income- tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) read with rule 2CA ofthe Income- tax Rules , 1962, the Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Jaipur hereby approves "Mahatma Jyotiba Fule Vidhyapeeth Samiti , Chomu, District- Jaipur" for the purpose of said Section for the A. Yrs . 2009-2010 & onwards .

(ii) अनुमोदित संगठन स्वयं वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान कार्य-कलाप जारी रखेगा ;

Provided that the society conforms to and complies with the provisions of sub- clause (vi) of clause (23C) of Section 10 ofthe Income- tax Act, 1961 read with rule 2CA of the Income-tax Rules , 1962 .

[No. CCIT/JPR/Addl.CIT (Hqrs .)/ 10(23C) (vi)/2009- 10/995]

B. S. DHILLON, Chief Commissioner of Income- tax.

शुद्धि-पत्र

जयपुर , 26 जून , 2009 .

(iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन बही-खाता रखेगा तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता-यही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ;

का.आ. 1830.-आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 सी ) के उपखण्ड ( vi ) के द्वारा तहत् अधिसूचना सं. 01/2009-10 दिनांक 13-04-2009 के द्वारा " साहित्य सदावर्त समिति, जयपुर " को स्वीकृति दी गई थी । अधिसूचना के पैरा 3 की लाईन 1 में " यह अनुमोदन " के स्थान पर " अनुमोदन केवल निर्धारण वर्ष 2001-02, 2002-03 एवं 2003-04 के लिए पढ़ा जाए ।

(iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा । [क्रमांक:मुआआआआआ ( मु. )/जय/ 10( 23सी ) (vi)/2009- 10/1019]

संगठन:- 2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित बी. एस. ढिल्लों, मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त CORRIGENDUM

(क ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

Jaipur, the 26th June, 2009

(ख) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा 3

(ग) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एवं प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

S.O. 1830.-In Notification No. 01/2009-10 dated 13-04-2009 vide which " Sahitya Sadawart Samiti , Jaipur " was approved for the purpose of sub-clause (vi) of clause (23C) ofSection 10 ofthe Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) read with rule 2CA ofthe Income-tax Rules , 1962, in para 3, line 1 may be read as ' The approval for A.Y. 2001-02, 2002- 03 & 2003-04 only ' instead of ' This approval' .

[No. CCIT/JPR/Addl.CIT (Hqrs .)/10(23C)(vi)/2009- 10/1019]

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्यकलाप करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्यकलाप को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा

B. S. DHILLON, Chief Commissioner ofIncome-tax

2287 G1/09-2 3772

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

(ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5ग और 5घ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[ अधिसूचना सं. 53/2009/फा.सं. 203/44/2009- आ.क.नि.- II ] पदम सिंह , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (Central Board of Direct Taxes) New Delhi , the 25th June, 2009

S.O. 1831. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Maharashtra Association for the Cultivation of Science, Pune has been approvedby the Central Government for the purpose of clause (ii ) of sub - section ( 1) of Section 35 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (said Act) , read with rules 5C and 5D of the Income-tax Rules , 1962 ( said Rules) with effect from 1-4-2008 in the category of ' Scientific Research Association ' subject to the following conditions , namely :

The sole objective of the approved ' Scientific Research Association ' shall be to undertake scientific research;

( ii) The approved organization shall carry out the scientific research activity by itself;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain books of accounts and get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section (2) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verifiedby such accountant to the Commissioner of Income-tax or the Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub - section (1) of Section 139 ofthe said Act ;

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit- referred to above.

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approyal ifthe approved organization .

(a) fails to maintain books of accounts referred to in sub -paragraph ( iii) ofparagraph 1: or (b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii) ofparagraph 1; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement ofdonations received and amounts applied for scientific research referred to in sub- paragraph ( iv ) of paragraph 1 ; or

[PART II-SBC. 3(ii) ] (d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine ; or (e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii) of sub - section ( 1) of Section 35 of the said Act read with rules 5C and 5D ofthe said Rules .

[Notification No. 53/2009/F.No.203/44/2009/ΙΤΑ- ΠΙ PADAM SINGH, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 25 जून , 2009

का.आ. 1832, सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग तथा 5घ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2010 से संगठन विजन रिसर्च फाउंडेशन , चैन्नई को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन ' वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है, अर्थात:-

(i ) अनुमोदित " वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ " का एक मात्र उद्देश्य वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करना होगा ;

( ii) अनुमोदित संगठन स्वयं वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान कार्य- कलाप जारी रखेगा ;

۱ (iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन बही-खाता रखेगा तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिषत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आंयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ;

संगठन:- 2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित (क) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(ख) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा (ग) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एवं प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा 3773

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

[ अधिसूचना सं. 53/2009/फा. सं. 203/20/2009- आ.क.नि.- II ] (e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii) of sub - section ( 1) of Section 35 ofthe said Act read with rules SC and 5D ofthe said Rules .

[Notification No. 53/2009/F . No. 203/20/2009/ITA- II ] PADAM SINGH, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 25 जून , 2009

पदम सिंह, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 25th June, 2009

S.O. 1832. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Vision Research Foundation, Chennai has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii) of sub - section (1) of Section 35 of the Income- tax Act , 1961 ( saidAct) , read with rules 5C and 5D ofthe Income- tax Rules , 1962 (said Rules) with effect from 1-4-2010 in the category of 'scientific research association' subject to the following conditions , namely: -

(1) The sole objective of the approved ' scientific research association' shall be to undertake scientific research;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out the scientific research activity by itself;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain books of accounts and get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section (2) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner ofIncome-tax or the Director of Income-taxhaving jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub -section (1) of Section 139 of the said Act;

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization .

(a) fails to maintain books of accounts referred to in sub-paragraph ( iii) of paragraph 1 ; or

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph (iii) ofparagraph 1; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research referred to in sub -paragraph ( iv) of paragraph 1 ; or (d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine ; or का.आ. 1833.- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग तथा ऽघ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2008 से संगठन फिजिकल रिसर्च लेबोरेट्री, अहमदाबाद को निम्नलिखित शों के अधीन ' वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ ' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थात्:-

(i ) अनुमोदित " वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ " का एक मात्र उद्देश्य वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करना होगा ;

(ii) अनुमोदित संगठन स्वयं वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान कार्य-कलाप जारी रखेगा;

(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन बही- खाता रखेगा तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(क) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(ख) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा (ग) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एवं प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्यकलाप करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्यकलाप को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा 3774

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 25 जून , 2009

(ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5ग और 5घ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन

नहीं करेगा ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 51/2009/फा.सं. 203/ 16/2009- आ.क.नि.- II ]

पदम सिंह , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 25th June, 2009

का.आ. 1834- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5 ग और 5ड. के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2008 से संगठन नेशनल होर्टिकल्चर रिसर्च एंड डवपलमेंट फाउंडेशन , नासिक को निम्नलिखित शतों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में संलग्न ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , नामत:-

(1) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

(ii) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा इसके नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान को जारी रखेगा;

S.O. 1833. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad, has been approved by the Central Government forthe purpose of clause (ii) of sub- section (1) of Section 35 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (said Act), read with rules 5C and 5D ofthe Income- tax Rules , 1962 (saidRules) with effect from 1-4-2008 in the category of 'scientific research association ' subject to the following conditions, namely : -

(1) The sole objective of the approved ' scientific research association ' shall be to undertake scientific research;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out the scientific research activity by itself;

( ii) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त धनराशि के संबंध में अलग बही - खाता रखेगा अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि को उसमें दर्शाएगा तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से ऐसी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain books of accounts and get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section (2) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income-tax or the Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case, by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub-section (1) of section 139 of the said Act;

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy ofsuch statement daly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of andit referred to above.

(क ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अलग लेखा बही नहीं रखेंगा; अथवा

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization.

(ख) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा (a) fails to maintain books of accounts referred to in sub -paragraph (iii) ofparagraph 1: or

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii) ofparagraph 1 ; or

पैराग्राफ 1 के उप - पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एवं प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा (ग)

(c) fails to furnish its statement ofdonations received and amounts applied for scientific research referredto in sub-paragraph (iv) ofparagraph 1;or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or

(ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5ड. के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड (ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii ) of sub- section ( 1) of Section 35 of the said Act read with rules SC and 5D of the said Rules .

[अधिसूचना सं. 50/2009/फा. सं. 203/69/2008-आ. क. नि.- II ]

पदम सिंह , अवर सचिव [Notification No. 51 /2009/F.No.308/16/2009/ITA- II ] PADAM SRICH, Under Secy.

3775

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ] .

New Delhi , the 25th June, 2009

S.O. 1834. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization National Horticulture Research and Development Foundation, Nasik has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause (ii ) ofsub-section ( 1) ofSection 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (saidAct), read with Rules 5C and 5E of the Income- taxRules, 1962 (said Rules ) with effect from 1-4-2008 in the category of ' other Institution' partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(i) The sums paid to the approved organization shall beutilized for scientific research;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect ofthe sums received by it for scientific research, reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section (2) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verifiedby such accountant to the Commissioner ofIncome-tax or the Director of Income -tax having jurisdiction over the case, by the due date of furnishing the return ofincome under sub - section (1) of Section 139 of the said Act;

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization :-

(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub- paragraph (iii) of paragraph 1 ; or

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph (iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub-paragraph (iv ) ofparagraph 1 ; or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activites or its research activities are not found to be genuine ; or (e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause (iii) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section35 ofthe said Act read with rules 5C and 5E ofthe said Rules .

[Notification No. 50/2009/ F.No . 203/ 69/2008/ΙΤΑ- II ] PADAM SINGH, Under Secy.

नईदिल्ली , 26 जून , 2009

का.आ. 1835.- सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 (उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक1-4-2003 से संगठन चाइल्ड्स ट्रस्ट मेडिकल रिसर्च फाउडेशन , चेन्नई को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में संलग्न ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , नामत:-

(i) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त धनराशिके संबंध में अलग बही - खाता रखेगा , अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि को उसमें दर्शाएगा तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से ऐसी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट, मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

( क ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii) में उल्लिखित अंलग लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(ख) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा (ग) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एवं प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य कलाप करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य कलाप को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा

(ड. ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5 ङ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड (ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 54/2009/ फा. सं. 203/59/2008- आ. क. नि.- II ]

पदम सिंह, अवर सचिव : 3776

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13, 1931

New Delhi , the 26th June , 2009

S.O. 1835. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization The Childs Trust Medical Research Foundation, Chennai has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of sub- section( 1) of Section 35 of the Income- tax Act , 1961 (said Act) , read with Rules 5C and 5E of the Income- tax Rules , 1962( said Rules) with effect from 1-4-2003 in the category of 'Other Institution' partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(i ) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;

( ii ) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students ;

( iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section (2) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner ofIncome-tax or the Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return ofincome under sub - section (1) of Section 139 of the said Act;

( iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above.

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization: ---

(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub - paragraph ( iii) of paragraph 1 ; or

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph (iii ) ofparagraph 1; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub - paragraph (iv ) ofparagraph 1 ; ог

(d) ceases to carry on its research activites or its research activities are not found to be genuine ; or ( e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the said Act read with rules 5C and 5E of the said Rules .

[Notification No. 54/2009/ F.No.203/ 59/2008 /ITA - II ] PADAM SINGH, Under Secy.

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] नईदिल्ली , 26 जून , 2009

का.आ. 1836, सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एत‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग और 5ड. के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ दिनांक 1-4-2009 से संगठन गुजरात इकोलॉजि सोसायटी, बडोदरा, गुजरात को निम्नलिखित शों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में संलग्न ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया हैं, नामतः- (i) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

( iii) अनुमोदित्त संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त धनराशि के संबंध में अलग बही - खाता रखेगा अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि को उसमें दर्शाएगा तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से ऐसी खाता-बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय की विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा !

(iv ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(क) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अलग लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(ख) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा (ग) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एवं प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य कलापं करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान काय। कलाप को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा

[ अधिसूचना सं. 55/2009/फा. सं. 203/38/2009-आ. क.

नि.- II ]

पदम सिंह, अवर सचिव 3777 भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 26th June, 2009 .

(वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग ) नई दिल्ली , 25 जून , 2009

S.O. 1836. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Gujarat Ecology Society, Vadodara, Gujarat has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii) of sub - section (1) of section 35 of the Income - tax Act, 1961 (said Act), readwith Rules 5C and 5E of the Income- tax Rules , 1962 (said Rules) with effect from 1-4-2009 in the category of 'other Institution' partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely:-

का.आ. 1837.-बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम , 1949 (1949 का 10 ) की धारा 53 ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्दीय सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर, एतद्वारा , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 19 की उप धारा ( 2 ) के उपबंध , आंध्रा बैंक पर उस सीमा तक लागू नहीं होंगे जहां तक उनका संबंध प्रस्तावित संयुक्त उद्यम कंपनी - बड़ौदा एल एंड जी जीवन बीमा कंपनी , जो एक शैल कंपनी है , की चुकता शेयर पूंजी की 30% से अधिक की शेयरधारिता से है ।

( i ) The sums paid to the approved organization shall beutilized for scientific research;

[फा.सं. 13/5/2008- बी ओ ए ] डी. डी. माहेश्वरी , अवर सचिव (ii ) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

(Department ofFinancial Services) New Delhi , the 25th June, 2009

S.O. 1837. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 (1 ) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949), the Central Government, on the recommendations of Reserve Bank of India, hereby declares that the provisions of sub-section (2) of Section 19 of the said Act shall not apply to Andhra Bank in so far as they relate to its holding ofthe shares in excess of 30 % of the paid up share capital oftheproposed Joint Venture company --Baroda L & G Life Insurance, Company the shell company.

( iii ) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section (2) of section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner ofIncome-taxorthe Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case, by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub - section (1) ofsection 139 of the said Act;

[F. No. 13/5/2008-BOA] D. D. MAHESHWARI , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 25 जून , 2009

(iv ) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above.

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization:-

का.आ. 1838 , बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम , 1949 ( 1949 का 10 ) की धारा 53 ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्दीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर , एतद्वारा , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 19 की उप धारा ( 2 ) के उपबंध , बैंक ऑफ बड़ौदा पर उस सीमा तक लागू नहीं होंगे जहां तक उनका संबंध प्रस्तावित संयुक्त उद्यम कंपनी- बड़ौदा एल एंड जी जीवन बीमा कंपनी , की चुकता शेयर पूंजी की 30 % से अधिक की शेयरधारिता से है ।

(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub - paragraph (iii) of paragraph 1 ; or

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph (iii ) ofparagraph 1 ; or

[फा.सं. 13/5/2008- बी ओ ए ] डी. डी. माहेश्वरी , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 25th June, 2009

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub -paragraph ( iv) ofparagraph 1 ; or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activites or its research activities are not found to be genuine ; or

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of section 35 of the said Act read with rules 5C and 5E of the said Rules .

S.O. 1838. In exercise ofthe powers conferred by Section 53 ( 1 ) of the Banking Regulation Act , 1949 ( 10 of 1949) , the Central Government , on the recommendation of Reserve Bank of India, hereby declares that the provisions of sub - section (2) of Section 19 of the said Act shall not apply to Bank of Baroda in so far as they relate to its holding of the shares in excess of 30 % of the paid up share capital ofthe proposed Joint Venture.company- Baroda L &G Life Insurance, Company.

[F. No. 13/5/2008- BOA ] D. D. MAHESHWARI , Under Secy.

[Notification No.55/2009/ F. No. 203/38/ 2009/ITA- II ] PADAM SINGH, Under Secy .

3778

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

नईदिल्ली, 25 जून , 2009

का.आ. 1839, रुग्ण औद्योगिक कंपनी ( विशेष उपबंध ) अधिनियम , 1985 की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) एवं ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एत‌द्वारा श्री अशोक कुमार मोहापात्रा , आई ए एस ( सेवानिवृत/एचपी:71 ) को उनके पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से, तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा उनके 65 वर्ष की आयु प्राप्त कर लेने तक अथवा औद्योगिक और वित्तीय पुनर्निर्माण अपीलीय प्राधिकरण के समापन तक , जो भी पहले हो , औद्योगिक और वित्तीय पुनर्निर्माण अपीलीय प्राधिकरण के सदस्य के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. 20(2 ) /2002- आईएफ- II ] जे. एस. फौगाट, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 25th June, 2009

S.O. 1839.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1) & (3 ) of Section 5 read with sub- section (2) ofSection 6 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act , 1985, the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Ashok Kumar Mohapatra, IAS ( Retd/HP : 71 ) asMember, Appellate Authority for Industrial & Financial Reconstruction ( AAIFR ) with effect from the date of assumption of charge of the post, for a period of three years or till he attains the age of 65 years or till the abolition ofAAIFR, whichever event takes place earliest.

[F. No. 20(2)/2002- IF - II] J. S.PHAUGAT, Under Secy.

स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय (स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण विभाग )

नईदिल्ली, 10 जून , 2009

का.आ. 1840. - भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 (1956 का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केंद्र सरकार भारतीय भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में एत‌द्वारा निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्: -

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (DepartmentofHealth and Family Welfare) New Delhi, the 10th June, 2009

S.O.1840.-In exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section (2) of the section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consultingthe Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the saidAct, namely:--

In the said First Schedule against " Calicut University , Calicut " under the heading ' Recognized MedicalQualification' [ in column (2) ] and under theheading 'Abbreviation forRegistration' [ in column (3 )] , the following shall be inserted, namely:---

M.B.B.S.

Bachelor of Medicine andBachelor of Surgery (This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by Calicut University, Calicut on or after November, 2008 in respect of students being trained at Jubilee Mission Medical College & Research Institute, Thrissur, Kerala).

[No.U - 12012/ 109/2002- ME(P- II)] K. V. S. RAO, Dy . Secy..

नई दिल्ली, 26 जून , 2009

का.आ. 1841.- केंद्र सरकार भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्:-

उक्त प्रथम अनुसूची में " महाराष्ट्र स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , नासिक , महाराष्ट्र" के सामने शीर्षक ' मान्यताप्राप्त आयुर्विज्ञान अर्हता [ स्तम्भ ( 2 ) में ] के अंतर्गत एवं शीर्षक " पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण " [ स्तम्भ (3 ) में ] के अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां रखी जाएंगी, अर्थात्:-

एम.बी.बी.एस.

आयुर्विज्ञान एवं

शल्य विज्ञान स्नातक

उक्त प्रथम अनुसूची में शीर्षक " मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता " [ स्तम्भ ( 2 ) में ] के अंतर्गत " कालीकट विश्वविद्यालय , कालीकट" और शीर्षक " पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण " [ स्तम्भ ( 3 ) में] के अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां शामिल की जाएंगी , अर्थात्:-

एम.बी.बी.एस.

आयुर्विज्ञान स्नातक और शल्य विज्ञान स्नातक (यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी यदि यह कालीकट विश्वविद्यालय , कालीकट द्वारा जुबली मिशन मेडिकल कॉलेज एवं अनुसंधान संस्थान , थ्रिस्सूर, केरल में प्रशिक्षण प्राप्त कर रहे छात्रों के संबंध में नवम्बर, 2008 में अथवा उसके उपरांत प्रदान की गई हो । )

[सं. यूः 12012/ 109/2002 - एम.ई. ( पी- II) ] के. वी. एस. राव , उप सचिव

(यह एक मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी यदि यह " महाराष्ट स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , नासिक, महाराष्ट्र" द्वारा पदम श्री डा. विठ्ठलराव विखे पाटिल फाउंडेशन मेडिकल कॉलेज , अहमदनगर, महाराष्ट्र में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे छात्रों के संबंध में दिसम्बर , 2008 के बाद प्रदान की गई हो । )

[सं. यू. 12012/37/2001 - एम.ई. ( पी- II) ]

के. वी. एस. राव , उप सचिव [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3779

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

New Delhi, the 26thJune, 2009

S.O. 1841. In exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section (2) of the Section 11 of the Indian Medical CouncilAct, 1956 ( 102 of 1956), the Central Government, after consultingthe Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the saidAct, namely:-

In the said First Schedule against " Maharashtra University of Health Sciences , Nashik, Maharashtra" under the heading ' Recognized Medical Qualification' [ in column (2) ] and under the heading ' Abbreviation for Registration' [ in column (3 ) ] , the following shall be inserted, namely:-

Bachelor ofMedicine andBachelor of Surgery

M.B.B.S. (This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra University, of Health Sciences Nashik, Maharashtra after December, 2008 in respect of students being trained at Padamshri Dr. Vithalrao Vikhe Patil Foundation's Medical College, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra)

[No. U-12012/37/2001 -ME(P - II)] K. V. S. RAO , Dy. Secy.

कृषि मंत्रालय (कृषि अनुसंधान तथा शिक्षा विभाग ) नई दिल्ली , 15 जून , 2009

का.आ. 1842.-केंद्रीय सरकार कृषि अनुसंधान एवं शिक्षा विभाग , राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियमावली 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय कृषि अनुसंधान के राष्ट्रीय पादप आनुवंशिक संसाधन ब्यूरो , पूसा, नई दिल्ली के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रीय केंद्रों को जिनके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, अधिसूचित करती है:-

1. क्षेत्रीय केंद्र, भवाली, उत्तराखंड 2. क्षेत्रीय केंद्र , रांची, झारखंड

[सं. 13-2/2002- हिंदी/136 ] राम अवतार, उप सचिव 2287 G1/09-3

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE

(Department ofAgricultural Research & Education) New Delhi , the 15th June, 2009

S.O. 1842.- In pursuance of sub- Rule (4) ofRule 10 of the Official Language (use for official purpose of the Union) Rules 1976, the Central Government, Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Research & Educationhereby notifies the following Regional Centres ofNational Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources , Pusa, New Delhi the Indian Council ofAgricultural Research (ICAR) where more than 80 % of staff have acquired the working knowledge ofHindi .

(i) Regional Centre, Bhowali , Uttarakhand. (i)Regional Centre , Ranchi , Jharkhand.

[No. 13-2/2002-Hindi/136] RAM AUTAR, Dy. Secy.

सूक्ष्म, लघु और मध्यम उद्यम मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 22 जून , 2009

का.आ. 1843. केंद्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा नियम , 1976 के (संघ केशासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम 10 के उप-नियम (4) के अनुसरण में सूक्ष्म, लघु और मध्यम उधम मंत्रालय के नियंत्रणाधीन विकास आयुक्त ( सूक्ष्म, लघु और मध्यम उद्यम ) कार्यालय के निम्नलिखित कार्यालय में हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान रखने वाले कर्मचारियों की संख्या 80 % से अधिक हो जाने के फलस्वरूप उन्हें एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है:

सूक्ष्म, लघु और मध्यम उच्चद्यम विकास संस्थान , 111 और 112, बी.टी. रोड, कोलकाता (प. बंगाल ) 700108

[सं. ई-12016/01/2005 - हिंदी] प्रवीर कुमार, संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF MICRO SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES

NewDelhi , the 22nd June, 2009

S.O. 1843. In pursuance of sub -Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official purposes of the Union) Rules 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following office of the Development Commissioner (MSME) Office under control of the Ministry of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises , where the percentage ofHindi knowing staff has gone above 80% .

Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Institute, 111 & 112, B.T. Road, Kolkata (W. Bengal)-700108

[No. E- 12016/01/2005-Hindi] PRAVIR KUMAR, It. Secy.

3780

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोवल मामले विचान)

(भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो )

नईदिल्ली , 4 जून , 2009

का.आ. 1844.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के निवम 7 के उपनिन ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये हैं ने रद्द कर दिए गए हैं और वापस ले लिए गए है :

अनुसूची

वापस लिए गए मानक ( कों ) की संख्या और वर्ष

टिप्पणी क्रम सख्या

भारत के राजपत्र भाग II , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) में का. आ. संख्या और

455,14-2-1987

आई एस 11039:1983/आईसी 60715(1981 )

2. 12974:1990.

880, 21-3-1992

[संदर्भ ईटी 07/जी -63 (ए) ]

आर. के. त्रेहन , वैज्ञानिक - ई एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी ) MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

NewDelhi, the4th June,2009

S.O. 1844.- In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule (1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 it is hereby notified that the Indian Standards , particulars ofwhich are mentioned in the Schedule give hereafter , have been cancelled and stand withdrawn .

SCHEDULE

Remarks

Sl . No. No. & Year of the Indian Standrad Withdrawn S.O. No. & Date published in the Guastte ofIndiaPart II, Section 3, Sub-section(ii)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

455. 14-2-1987

IS 11039 : 1983 /IEC 60715 ( 1981) Requirements for

mounting on rails in switchgear and controlgear installations

880dt. 21-3-1992

IS 12974 : 1990 Semiconductor contractors

[Ref: ET07/G-63(A) ]

R. K. TREHAN, Scientist & Head (Electrotechnical)

नई दिल्ली, 18 जून , 2009

का.आ. 1845.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो निक्म , 1987 के निचन 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के सांड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वह स्थापित हो गया है :-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक (कों ) की सख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक नवे भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित

क्रम संख्या

भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष

30जून2009 भामा 5572 :2009 जोखिमपूर्ण क्षेत्रों का वर्गीकरण (खानों को छोड़कर ) विद्युतीय संस्थापन के लिए ज्वलनशील गैस और वाष्प वाले ( तीसरा पुनरीक्षण ) [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) )

3781

भारत का राजपन : जुलाई 4, 2009/आपाड़ 13 , 1931

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयोंः नई दिल्ली, कोलकता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना , चूचे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं । '

[संदर्भ ईटी 22/टी -5 ] आर. के. त्रेहन, वैज्ञानिक ई एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी)

NewDelhi , the 18th June,2009

S.O. 1845. In pursuance of clause (b) ofRules (1 ) of Rule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards, particulars ofwhich are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued:

SCHEDULE

No. & Year ofthe Indian Standards Sl. No..

(1)

(2)

1 IS 5572 : 2009 Classification ofHazardous Areas(Other than Mines) having Flammable Gasesand Vapours for Electrical Installation (Third Revision)

Date of Established No.&Year ofthe Indian Standards, ifany, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(3)

(4)

30June2009 Copies ofthis Standard are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan, 9 , Bahadur shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi- 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh, Mumbai and alsoBranch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Bhubanshwer, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: ET22/T-5] R. K. TREHAN, Scientist & Head (Electrotechnical)

नई दिल्ली , 22 जून , 2009

का.आ. 1846.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के नियम (4 ) के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे दिए गए हैं, वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं:-

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

क्रम संख्या

लाइसेंस संख्या

स्वीकृत करने की तिथिवर्ष/माह

1. 9721081 8-4-2009 न्यूएरा इन्टरनैशनल, गली नं. 6 , इण्डस्ट्रियल इन्कलेव गोदाईपुर, जालन्धर ( पंजाब )

2. 9724289 17-4-2009 शिवालिक एग्रो कैमीकल्स, बी-59 , फेज-7, इण्डस्ट्रियल एरिया, मोहाली 3. 9725493 21-4-2009 रेनुका फूड प्रोसैसर, लेन नं. 8 , सिडको काम्पलैक्स, इण्डस्ट्रियल ग्रोथ सैन्टर , साम्बा, जम्मू(जे एंड के)

अनुसूची

भाग अनु वर्ष भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक भा मा संख्या

1987

1879

धातवर्ध्य ढलवें लोहे की पाईप फिटिंग्स

8074

1990 मोनोक्रोटोफॉस एस एल

36%

2004 पैकेजबन्द पेय जल

14543

[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ]

पी. के. गम्भीर , उप महानिदेशक (मुहर ) 3782

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

[PART II SEC .3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 22nd June, 2009

S.O. 1846. In pursuance ofsub - regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars ofwhich are given in the following schedule:

Grant Date

SL. No.

Licence No.

Name and Address of the Party 1.

8-4-2009

9721081

M/sNew Era International, Gali No. 6, Indl . Enclave, Godaipur, Jalandhar 2. 9724289 17-4-2009 M/s. ShivalikAgro Chemicals , B-59, Phase-7 , Indl . Area, Mohali.

21-4-2009

3. 9725493

M/s. Renuka Food Processors Lane No.8 , SIDCO Complex, Indl .Growth Centre, Samba(J&K)

SCHEDULE

Title of the Standard ISNo. Part Sec . Year

1879

1987 MCI PipeFittings

1990

8074

SL Monocrotophos 36%

2004

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

[No. CMD/13 : 11 ] P. K. GAMBHIR, Dy. Director General (Marks)

नई दिल्ली , 22 जून , 2009

का.आ. 1847.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के नियम ( 4 ) के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व फ्तत

क्रम संख्या

लाइसेंस संख्या तिथिवर्ष/माह स्वीकृत करने की

4 1

11-5-2009

7942087

यूनिफ्लैक्स केबल लिमिटेड , 158/162 , जी आई डी सी, अंबरगांव 396171 , डिस्ट्रिक्ट वलसाद गुजरात 2.

1-5-2009

7940386

श्रृंगार ज्वैलर्स 22, सोनल अपार्टमेंट, सुभाष चौक के पास , मेमनगर , अहमदाबाद -380 052

8-5-2009 के के गोल्ड 3. 7941792

ए 3 , उमिया काम्पलैक्स व्यापारी जिन , कलोल , गांधीनगर-382 721

4-5-2009

7940487

आदित्य बिवरेज कम्पनी एस आर नंबर 329/बी, डाकोर रोड, गांव अरेरी , ताल्लुका मेहमदाबाद खेडा-387130

अनुसूची

भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

भाग अनु वर्ष

भा मा संख्या

694

1990 पी की इंसूलेटिड केबल

1417 1990 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

1417 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

2004

14543

पैकेजबंद पेयजल [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3783

भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/आबाढ़ 13 , 1931

4 2

20-5-2009

7944091

हीरामणी ज्वैलर्स, गांधी चौक पुलिस स्टेशन के सामने , गांधी चौक , मेहसाना 382715

6 7945295 25-5-2009 कृष्णा फूड एंड बिवरेइज पीपलाञ पीराना रोड, गॉव पीचलाज , अहमदाबाद 382405

1999

1417

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुओं के आभूषणों शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन

14543

2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल

[सं. सी.एम डी/ 13: 11]

पी. के. गम्भीर, उपमहानिदेशक ( मुहर )

New Delhi , the 22nd June, 2009

S.O. 1847.-In pursuance of sub -regulation (5) of the regulation 4of the Bureau of Indian Standards. (Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule:

Grant Date

Licence No.

SL. No.

Name and Address of the party 1. 7942087 11-5-2009 Uniflex Cables Limited, 158/162, GIDC, Umbergaon 396171 , Dist Valsad (Gujrat)

2. 7940386 1-5-2009 Shangar Jewellers 22, Sonal Tantament, Near Subhash Chowk, Memnagar Ahmedabad-380052

8-5-2009 K. K. Gold 3. 7941792

A-3,UmiyaComplex, Vepari Jin, KalolGandhi Nagar- 382721

4-5-2009

4. 7940487

Aditya Beverages Company Sr. No. 329/B , Dakok Road, VillageAreri , Taluka Mehme- dabadKheda-387130

20-5-2009

5. 7944091

Hiramani Jewellers Opp.Gandhi Chowk Police Station , Gandhi Chowk, Mehsana- 382715

25-5-2009

6. 7945295

Krishna Food and Beverages Piplaj PiranaRoad, Village Piplaj ,Ahnmodabad-382405

SCHEDULE

Part Sec Year Title of the Standard IS.No.

1990

694

PVC InsulatedCables

1999

1417

Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking

1999

1417

GoldandGoldAlloys, Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking

2004

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

1417 1999 GoldandGoldAlloys, Jewellery/Artefacts- Fineness and Marking

2004

14543

Packaged Drinking Water

[No. CMD/13 : 11 ] P. K. GAMBHIR, Dy. Director General (Marks) 3784

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 24 जून , 2009

का.आ. 1848.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के उप- विमिवध ( 5 ) के तहत यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि निम्नलिखित ब्यौरे वाले लाइसेन्स प्रदान किल्ले वाले हैं ।

अनुसूची

पार्टी का नाम व पत्ता ( कर ) लागूतिथी

क्रम संख्या

लाइसेंस संख्या

4 2

1. 6911374 20090304

मेसर्स श्री कामाक्षी ज्वेलरी मार्ट पुराना श्रॉफ बाजार गडग , कोडगू-582101 2. 6911475 20090304

मेसर्स कंचन ज्वेलर्स सं. 134/1 , चौथा मुखन रोड , १ाँ क्रास , चामसनपेगेट, बेंगलूर-560018 3. 6911576 20090304

मेसर्स श्री नावल्टी ज्वेलर्स एस. एम. एस. पी. कॉम्प्लेक्स उरुप्पि-576101 4. 6911677 20090304 मेसर्स कोणारी डाथमन्क्स एण्ड ज्वेलर्स प्लॉट सं. 4 , नीचा माला , बनाने बिल्डिंग, सुपर मार्केट , गुलवर्णा-585101 5. 6912073 20090304

मेसर्स के. चंपालाल ज्वेलर्स मार्केट रोड , डोडावेलारामपुर, बेंगलूर-561203 6. 6911172 20090304 मेसर्स पी. एस. आई सं. 10/3 , दूसरा मुख्म रोड , 11 क्रॉस , सोमेश्वर नगर , जामनर पहला ब्लॉक , बेंगलूर -560011 7. 6914077 20090311

मेसर्स एस . एम . राबकर ज्वेलर्स बॉम्बे रेस्तरों के सामने , सुभान रोड, धारबाड -580001 20090311

6914178

मेसर्स पी. बस्टीमुल बोहरा ज्वेलर्स पहला क्रॉस रोड , रोबरसोनपेट , के. जी एफ. , कोलार -563122 9. 6914279 20090311

मेसर्स विमल ज्वेलर्स सं.699/86, दूसरा मुखन रोड, प्रकाश नगर, बेंगलूर-560021 मानक की उपाधी

भा.मा. संख्या भाग/खखंड व वर्ष

IS1417: 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं गाधिनि

IS 1417: 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आनून/शिल्पकारी सुद्धता एवं नारिंग

IS1417: 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं माथिति

IS 1417: 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र भातुएं, एवं गाधिगि

IS1417: 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मर्किंग

IS 14543 : 2004

गोदनेवचल (पैकेजचंद मिनरल जल के अलावा)

IS1417: 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं , आनून/सिल्पकारी सुद्धता एवं मार्किंग

IS1417: 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आनूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धत एवं मार्किंग

IS 1417: 1999 स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आचूषण/ शिल्पकारी शुद्धल एवं मार्किंग 3785 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4 , 2009/आषाढ़ 13 , 1931

मानक की उपाधी

पार्टी का नाम व पता (कारखाना)

लागूतिथि

लाइसेंस संख्या

क्रम संख्या

भा.मा. संख्या भाग/खंड ववर्ष

10. 6914885 20090312

IS1417: 1999

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग

मेसर्स मधुबनज्वेल्स सं. 101/1 , कोतारी टॉवर , नगर्तपेट क्रॉस , रजता महल लेइन के सामने , बेंगलूर-560002

20090312

11. 6915180

IS2878:2004

अग्निशामक , कार्बन डाई आक्साइड वाले ( सुवाहय एवं ट्राली आरोपित)

मेसर्स ऐयस इंजीनियरिंग वर्क्स पुराना सं. 34 , नया सं. 18 , ऐरिकेम्पानाहल्ली , बेंगलूर -560027

12. 6914986 20090312

IS14543:2004

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा )

मेसर्स नवकर बीवरेजस एण्ड मिनरल्स देवरगुडिहल गाँव , हुब्ली तालुक , भरवाड-580024

13. 6915079 20090312

IS14543:2004

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा)

मेसर्स रामनाथ फूड एण्ड बीवरेज इंडस्ट्री, कवातर गाँव , मुल्की तालुक, दक्षिण कन्नडा, बेंगलूर-575006

20090316

14. 6916182

IS1417: 1999

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवं मार्किंग

मेसर्स मारूति ज्वेलर्स कनकादास रोड, संस्कृत कॉलेज के पास , उडुष्पि-576101

20090316

15. 6916283

IS1417: 1999

स्वर्ण तथा स्वर्ण मिश्र धातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी शुद्धता एवंमार्किंग

मेसर्स निर्मलज्वेलर्स 2515/16 , रविवारपेट गोकक , बेलगाम, गोकक-591307

20090323

IS14543:2004 16. 6918489

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैकेजबंद मिनरल जल के अलावा)

मेसर्स धनुष इंडस्ट्रीज सर्वे सं. 186/6 , कोप्पाल , कुस्तगि

17. 6919592 20090326

IS15477:2004

सिरेमिक टाइल्स और पच्चिकारी में प्रयुक्त आसंजक

मेसर्स अडेक्स एन्ड्यूरा ( इंडिया) प्राईवेट लिमिटेड 73/1-बी, बैरेगौडा इंडस्ट्रीयल एस्टेट,. श्रीगंधानगर , हेग्गनाहल्ली, पीन्या, दूसरा स्टेज, बेंगलूर-560091"

[सं. सीएमडी/13: 11 ]

पी. के. गम्भीर, उप महानिदेशक (मार्क्स) 3786

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4 , 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ]

New Delhi, the24th June , 2009

S.O. 1848. In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulations 1988, ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars ofwhich are given in the following schedule:-

Sl. No.

Licence No.

Operative Date

SCHEDULE

Title ofthe Standard

IS No. Part/ Sec.Year

Name and address (Factory)

oftheParty

4 12

1. 6911374

20090304

IS 1417: 1999 Gold and gold alloys , Jewellery/ artifacts-fineness andmodoing

M/s. Shree Kamakshi Jewellery

Mart, Old ShroffBear,Gadeg

Kodagu-582101

20090304 2. 6911475

M/s . Kanchan Jewellers No. 134/1 ,4th Main Road, 9thCross, Chamarajpet, Bangaloe-560018 3. 6911576

20090304

IS1417: 1999 Gold and gold alloys, Jewellery/artifacts-fineness and marking

IS1417: 1999 Gold and gold alleys , Jewellery/artifacts -fineness andmarking

M/s . Shree Novelty Jewellers

S.M.S.P. Complex,

Udupi-576101

20090304 4. 6911677

M/ s. Kothari Diamonds & Jewels , Plot No. 4,Ground Floor, KhanaageBuilding, SuperMarket, Gulbarga-585101

20090304 5. 6912073

IS 1417: 1999 Goldand gold alloys , Jewellery/artifacts -fineness and marking

IS 1417: 1999 Goldand alloys , Jewellery/ artifacts -fineness and marking

M/s. K. Champalal Jewellers

MarketRoad,Dodabelalapur

Bangalore-561203

20090304 6. 6911172

M/s. PSI Ganesh Marketing No. 10/3 , 2nd Main Road, 11th Cross , Someshwara Nagar, Jayanagar Ist Block, Bangaloe-560011

20090311 7. 6914077

IS14543: 1999 PackagedDrinking Water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

IS 1417 : 1999

M/s. S.M. Raikar Jewellers

Opp. Bombay Restaurant,

Subhas Road, Dharwad-580001

20090311 8. 6914178

M/s . P. Bastimull Bohra Jewellers Ist Cross Road, Robersonbet, K.G.F, Kolar-563122

20090311 9. 6914279

Gold andgold alloys, Jewellery/artifacts-fineness andmarking

IS 1417: 1999 Gold and gold alloys , Jewellery/artifacts-fineness andmarking

IS1417: 1999 Gold and gold alloys , Jewellery/artifacts-fineness andmarking

M/s.Vimal Jewellers

No. 699/86, 2nd Main Road,

Prakashnagar ,

Bangalore-560021

20090312 10. 6914885

M/s .Madhuban Jewels No.101/ 1 , Kotari Tower, Nagarthpet Cross , Opp . Rajatha Mahal Lane, Bangalore-560002

IS 1417: 1999 Gold and gold alloys, Jewellery/artifacts -fineness andmarking [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3787

भारत का राजपुत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/ आवाड़ 13, 1931

4 2

20090312

11. 6915180.

M/ s.ACE EngineeringWorks OldNo. 34, New No. 18, Arekempanahalli , Bangaloe-560027

20090312

12. 6914986

6 5

IS2878:2004 FireExtinguisher, Carbon DioxideType(Portable and Trolley Mounted)

IS14543:2004 PackagedDrinking Water (Other thenPackaged natural mineral water)

M/s. Navkar Beverages &

Minerals , Devargudihal

Village,Hubli Taluk,

Dharwad-580024

20090312

13. 6915079

M/s.Ramanath Food & Beverage Industry, Kavathar Village, Mulky Taluk, Dakshin Kannada, Mangalore- 575006

20090316

14. 6916182

IS14543:2004 Packaged Drinking Water (Other then Packaged natural mineral water)

IS 1417 : 1999

M/s.Maruthi Jewellers

Kanakadas Road , Near Sanskrit

College,Udupi- 576101

20090316

15. 6916283

Gold and gold alloys, Jewellery/artifacts -fineness andmarking

IS1417: 1999

M/s.Nirmal Jewellers

2515/16, RaviwarpethGokak,

Belgaum,Gokak-591307

16. 6918489

20090323

Gold and gold alloys; Jewellery/artifacts -fineness andmarking

IS14543: 2004

M/s.Dhanush Industries

Sy. No. 186/6, Koppal

Kustagi

20090326

17. 6919592

M/s.Ardex Endura(India) Pvt. Ltd. 73/1B, Byregowda Industrial Estate, Srigandhanagar , Hegganahalli , Peenya 2nd Stage, Bangalore-560091 PackagedDrinking Water (Other then Packaged natural mineral water)

IS15477: 2004 Adhesives for use with Ceramic Tiles and Mosaics

[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ] P. K. GAMBHIR, Dy. Director General (Marks)

नई दिल्ली, 29 जून , 2009

भारतीय का.आ. 1849.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम, 1988 के विनियम 5 के उप - विनियम (6 ) के अनुसरण में मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों की हैं उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तारीख से रद्द कर दिया गया है :-

अनुसूची क्रम सं.

लाईसेंसधारी का नाम व पता लाईसेंस संख्या सीएम/एल

(3) (1)

(2)

7354373

लीलाधर फूड केम इण्डस्ट्रीज प्लॉट सं. डब्ल्यू-16 टी.टी.सी. इण्डस्ट्रीयल एरिया एम.आय.डी.सी. , पाचने 2287 G1 /09-4

लाईसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/ प्रक्रम सम्बद्ध भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

रद्द करने की तिथि (4)

(5)

3-4-2009 भा मा 5346:1994 सलिष्ट खाद्य रंग और मिक्बर

[संख्या केन्द्रीय प्रमाणन विभाग/ 13 : 13 ] पी. के. गंभीर, उपमहानिदेशक (प्रमाणन) 3788

[PART II-SBC.3 (ii) ]

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13, 1931

NewDelhi , the 29th June,2009

S.O. 1849. In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hersby notifies that the licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule have been cancelled with offect from the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE Licence No.

Sl . No.

Name and Address of the licencee

(1)

(2)

(3)

7354373

Liladhar Food Chem . " Industries PlotNo. W- 16 , T.T.C. Industrial Area M.I.D.C. , Pawane Navi Mumbai -400705

Date of Cancellation Article/Process with relevant Indian Standard coveredby the licence cancelled

(4)

(5)

3-4-2009 IS5346:1994 Synthetic Food Colours andMixtures

[No. CMD/13: 13 ] P. K. GAMBHIR, Dy. Director General (Marks)

नई दिल्ली, 29 जून , 2009

का.आ. 1850.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के नियम 4 के उप - विनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाईसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं, वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं : -

अनुसूची क्रम सं.

लाईसेन्ससं.

लाईसेंसधारी का नाम

स्वीकृत करने की तिथिवर्ष/माह

(3)

(1)

(2)

(4)

रायल जल

3-4-2009

7912179

भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक भा मा भाग अनु वर्ष सं

(6) (5)

भामा 14543 :2004 वैोजबंद पीने का पानी ( पैबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

सी-219 एम. आय. डी.सी

मिरजओले , रत्नागिरी ,

महाराष्ट्र 414639

2-4-2009

7922182

भामा 14543 :2004

यशवी फूड प्रोडक्टस्

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (पैकोजनंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

239/3/1 पुसमा प्रकास

रोड, नन्दूरबार ,शहादा

महाराष्ट्र 425409

7923285

3-4-2009 एक्सल अथवा डी-21 , अतिरिक्त एमआयडीसी , एरियर लालिंग , कुले

भामा 14543 :2004 पैकेजर्बद पीने का पानी ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

महाराष्ट्र-424005

[संख्मा केन्द्रीय प्रमाणन विभाग/ 13: 11 ] पी. के. गंभीर , उप- महानिदेशक ( प्रमाणन )

New Delhi , the 29th June,2009

S.O. 1850.- In pursuance of sub- regulation (6) of regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification ) Regulations, 1988, the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the licences particulars ofwhich are given below in the following schedule:

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3789

भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13 , 1931

Licence No.

Sl . No.

Grant Date Name and Address (factory) ofthe Party

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 1.

7912179

3-4-2009 Royal Jal C-219 , M.I.D.C. , Mirjole, Ratnagiri , Maharashtra -414639

7922182

2-4-2009 Yashvi Food Product, 239/3/1 Old Prakasha Road, Nandurbar Shahda Maharashtra -425409

7923285

3-4-2009 Excel Aqua D- 21 , Addl . MIDCArea, Laling Dhule, Maharashtra-424005

SCHEDULE

Product

IS No./Part/Sec . Year

(5)

(6)

14543:2004 Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

14543:2004 Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged NaturalMineral Water)

14543:2004 Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ] P. K. GAMBHIR, Dy. Director General (Marks)

नई दिल्ली, 30 जून , 2009

का.आ. 1851. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खण्ड (ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक (को ) में संशोधन किया गया/किए गए हैं ।

क्रम सं.

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

(2)

(1)

आई एस 884 : 1985

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि (3)

(4)

संशोधन संख्या 3 , दिसम्बर , 2008

23जून ,2009 इन संशोधनों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो मानक भवन 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कायम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा शिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध है ।.

[संदर्भ: सीईडी/राजपत्र ] एं के. सैनी, वैज्ञानिक' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी )

NewDelhi , the 30thJune,2009

S.O. 1851. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule ( 1) ofRule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , theBureau ofIndian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars ofwhich are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:

SLNo. No. and Year ofthe Indian Standard

SCHEDULE

No. and year of

the amendment

(3)

(2)

(1)

IS884: 1985

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

(4)

23 June2009

Amendment No. 3 , December2008

Copiesofthis Standard are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Banglore , Bhopal, Bhubanshwer, Coimbatore, Guwahate, Hyderabad, Jaipur Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna, Pune, thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref.:CED/Gazette] A. K. SAINI, Sc . ' F' & Head (Civil Engg .) 3790

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4 , 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii) ]

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नईदिल्ली, 23 जून , 2009

का. आ. 1852. भारत सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मैसर्स रिलाएन्स इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के आन्ध्रप्रदेश में पूर्वी तट पर ऑनशोर टरमिनल से देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए, मैसर्स रिलोजिसटिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और, भारत सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि, उस भूमि में, जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , भारत सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई अधिसूचना की प्रतियों साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के लिए उपायोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के संबंध में श्री के . गंगाचलम सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मैसर्स रिलोजिसटिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड , न . 67-11-21 /2, साथिसुजा, न्यु सेंचुरी पब्लिक स्कूल के सामने , एल बी नगर , काकिनाडा - 533003 , पूर्वी गोदावरी जिला, आंन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक:सामलकोट

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला: पुर्वी गोकबरी

गाँव का नाम

सर्वे नं . / सथ डिविजन सं .

108/3

1 ) पनसापाडु

108/2

108/1

107

104/2ए

104/ 2वी

104/1

105

100/5वी

100/4ए

100/1बी

100/ 1 ए

2) पी. बेमावरम

73/1

73/2

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने

के लिए क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एथर सि एयर

00 01

00 00

00 26

00 00

00 03

00 04

83 00

00 19

00 06

05 3791

भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/आवाड़ 13, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड3 (ii) ]

2 1

2) पी. वेणावरम (निरंतर)

61/1

60/1

59/6

59/7

59/3

59/4

33/2

33/1

41/2

3 ) उन्दूरू

41/1

42/2

42/1

539

4) सामलकोट

538

540

542

12/1

5) कापवरम

12/3

12/4/

10/1

10/2

18/2

22.

23/2

23/1

26 00

66 00

38 00

91 32

12 15

58 00

20 01

40 03

26 00 13

75 00

57 00

16 00 07

07 00

37 03

87 00 04

89 02

08 00

81 00 51

89 00 03

75 00 30

38 21

40 28

63 1.9

28 00 10

70 00 06

74 00

36 00

54 30

42 61

43 66

74 18

48 00 16.

84 00

31 00 69

08 00

84 : 34

00 16

07 06

10 00

64 00 30

50 00 05

92 00

76 00 04 3792

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13, 1931

371 6) पवारा

375

368

374

367/3

348

347

342

341/1

340/1

339/1

338/1

335

334/1

334/2

333

323/10

323/9

323/7

322

315/2

311

जिला : पुर्वी गोपावरी मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक:पिठापुरम

101/3डी 1) सोमाबरम

101/3सी

101/3बी

100/2

100/1

100/3

99/2

99/1

98/6

98/4

14/15 2) कन्डराडा

14/1एफ

14/5सी

14/4ए

14/4वी

14/4सी

14/5ए

14/3बी

14/6

18/6

18/7

24/10 ए

24/10वी

[Part II-Sec. 3(ii)]

01 03

53 00 12

43 00 03

50 00 18

80 00

42 00 26 89 00 42

58 00 80

44 00 10

83 00 12

94 00 00

10 00 23

81 00 06

73 00 27

00 00

36 00

00 04

70 राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश

00 07

56 00

80 00 01

30 00 12

90 00

73 00 02

00 13

12 00 30

00 10

09 00 05

31 00 08

56 00

67 00

00 08

58 00

85 00

39 00

00 05

05 00 17

70 00

87 00

12 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3793

भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/आबाढ़ 13, 1931

24/10सी 2) कन्डराडा (निरंतर)

24/9

24/8बी

24/7

24/7डी

24/7सी

24/6

24/8ए

25/2

25/1

44/9

44/6

44/3

44/2ए

44/2वी

44/ 2सी

44/1

40/4

58/4

58/2डी

58/2सी

58/1 ए

58/2ए

68/1

68/2

65/19

65/17

65/15

65/16

65/14

65/7

65/8

65/9

96/2डी

93/5

93/4

93/15

93/1जी

93/1डी.

93/1सी

93/3

93/2

94/4

94/6ए

94/6वी

00 07

88 02

47 00 00

88 00 00

96 00 01

25 00 01

63 00

52 00 06

00 00

00 01

00 49

00 08

00 09

00 10

00 00

00 18

00 00

00 04

00 14

00 03

00 00

00 25

00 02

00 10

00 00

00 16

00 02

00 00

00 01

00 04

00 03

00 00

00 05

00 06

00 35

00 25

45 3794

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13, 1931

2 1

96/3號 2) कन्डराडा (निरंतर)

96/3एफ

96/3जी

96/1जे

96/1के

96/1 एल

96/1जी

96/1 एच

96/ 2आई

96/1 एफ

96/ 2जे

96/15

96/1डी

96/2एल

96/ 2एम

96/1सी

96/1बी

96/1 ए

149

152

151

3 ) कुमारपुरम

28/1

28/6

28/2

26/6

26/1बी

26/2ए

26/2वी

26/2सी

26/3

26/1ए

21/5

21/6

21/4

21/3

19/2

4) पिठापुरम

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii ) ] 4

10 00

13 06

55 00

90 00

32.

77 00 02

46 04

44 00

03 06 00

10 00 00

91 00 09

00 01

78 00 05

00 03

52 05

78 00

59 00

19 10

50 00

10 00

51 00

09 00

51 00 08

89 00 04

00 43

59 00 34

00 28

78 04

10 00

85 00 01

13 01

73 00

86 00

10 00

06 00

93 00

10 00

12 24

04 00 18

66 00 03

66 00 3795

भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4 , 2009/ आषाढ़ 13, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

4) पिठापुरम (निरंतर)

15/1

15/2

15/3

15/4

18/5

119

120

121

113

109

111

110

190

192

191

195

188

185

184

196

197/4

197/3

183/2

197/2

223/6

223/4

224/8

224/6

224/5

224/4

226

5) अग्रहारम

99/1

101/4

101/5ए

101/5वी

101/6ए 2287 G1/09-5

19 06

36 00

00 13

02 00 16

00 00

82 00 35

25 02

41 00

66 00

82 52

45 00 29

60 86

40 00

12. 00

60 00 28

46 00 04

35 05

07 00

46. 02

11 01

00 00

92 00

86 00 12

79 00 14

06 01

19 00 24

63 00 40

23 00- 49

33 GO

28.

45 00 00

81 52

24 13

07 00 26

19 00 31

00 22

69 22

00 00 10

55 02

54 00 3796

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

103/1

5) अग्रहारम (निरंतर)

103/2

104/1

105/2

106

107

108

109

110/2

110/1

128/1बी

128/1 ए

129/1

132/2

13.1

133/28

133/27

133/25

133/24

133/23

133/26

133/22

133/21

133/20

133/19

133/17

152/3

152/2

152/12

152/13

151

284

6) रापरती

285

349/6

349/5

351

347

350/2

350/1

352

375/2

375/1

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii) ] 3

00 08

87 00 29

09 00 31

96 00 00

21 00 20

83 00 00

14 00

10 00 00

00 03

05 00

01 00 36

73 07

51 00

00 09

08 00

73 18

43 00

72 00 01

66 00 00

53 00

41 00

00 00

35 00 09

00 06

81 00 08

87 06

50 02

10 00 00

00 14

65 07

95 00 17

81 00

31 00

25 05

87 01

00 02

84 11

90 00

10 00

66 00 09

95 00 20

00 10

21 00

07 53

92 01

00 28

65 [ भाग II- खण्ड3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

2 1

376

6) रापरती (निरंतर)

372

371

370/3

370/2

370/1

369/2

381/3

380

381/1

381/2

416/2 7) भोगापुरम

416/3

416/1

417

413/8

413/7

413/6

413/5

413/4

413/2

410/3

410/4

410/6

411

409

432/2

432/1

432/3

433/3

433/4

431/3

431/2

431/1

435/1

436/2

436/1

437/1

437/2

439

289/3

289/4

3797 4

00 25

00 43

73 00 03

00 01 63

87 00 48

77 02

14 00 00

00 03. 81 00

14 00

60 00 05

91 00 03

10 00 00

00 08

98 00 23

04 00

78 15

00 03

31 00

54 13

90 06

00 07

00 10

78 00 01

10 00

00 32

84 00

33 00 05

08 28

00-

59 00

96 23

16 00

17 00 09

63 03

57 00

10 00

00 01- 79

61 00 04

48 00

33 00

14 00 01

03 00 08

91 10

74 05

25 04

73 00

07 3798

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

289/5 7) भोगापुरम (निरंतर)

289/9

289/8

289/10

289/11

288/6

288/1

254/6

254/4

254/2

254/1

258/4

258/5

258/3

257

256/1

256/2

260/3

260/2

260/1

261/1

262/3सी

262/3बी

262/2

262/1बी

262/1 ए

265/4

243/1

242/ 2ए

242/ 2वी

242/ 2सी

242/1

217/1

217/2

216/2

216/3

215

196/2

196/1

197/1ए

197/1वी

197/1 सी

[Part II-Sec. 3(ii)]

00 01

07 00

86 00

00 06

32 00 04

37 20

52 00 02

33 00 09

52 00 06

05 00 01

16 00 08

00 29

00 06

68 00 00

16 00

00 12

64 15

00 42

17 00

00 00

98 00 12

64 00

05 13

36 00

62 00

09 00

94 05

72 11

26 00

00 14

83 00

00 05

54 00

23 12

00 18

26 00 00

28 3799

भारत का समयत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/ आषाढ़ 13, 1981

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

2 1

198/5ए- 7) भोगापुरम (निरंतर)

198/5वी

198/2

198/3

20.2/1

201/2

201/1

201/7

200/1

200/2

150/4

150/5

149/5

149/6

149/4

149/3

149/2

148

57 00 19

11 00

00 03

55 00 05

80 00

7.4 00

09 00 04

20 00

24 00

73 00 16

65 00

32 00 14

49 00 31

65 राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला:पुर्वी गोदावरी

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक:गोल्लाप्रोलु

593/10 1) गोल्लाप्रोलु

593/4

593/8

593/7

593/6

593/5

593/ 2ए

593/ 2बी

593/ 2सी

592/2

592/1

5/1

5/2

5/3

5/4

12/1

11/2

11/6

10/1

62 00 23

14 00 01

58 00 09

42 00 08

72 00

14 00

2.2

26 00

07 00 20

73 00 06

96 00

31.

23 00 06

1:6 00 / 03

50 00

95 00

49 00

2:6

00 09

54 3800

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

2 1

27/3

1) गोल्लाप्रोलु (निरंतर)

80/3

80/4

46/2

46/1

47/2

47/1

49/1

50/1

51/2

51/3

53-

54/7

54/5

54/4

54/1

54/2

54/3

55/12

55/10

55/11

59/2

57/1/6

57/1/7

57/1/8

605/5

2) वेन्दुर्ती

605/4

606/3

606/2

606/1

607

562

3) चेब्रोलु

561/4

560/2

560/1

[Part II-Sec. 3( ii )] 3

00 17

10 00

84 00

41 42

00 59

16 00 04

02 05

00 00

10 00 00

65 27

72. 00 02

50 00 00

11 00

62 37

07 00

63 53

66 71

70 01

00 02

42 00 46

86 00

54 00

01 00 00

10 00

75 06

70 00

28 00 00

17 00

32 00

51 28

98 00 05

79 00 04

68 00

23 15

32 00 25

10 00 01

15 00 03

12 00 27

88 00

63 00 07

10 00 00

13 00 04

16 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3801

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

561/1 3) चेखोलु (निरंतर)

561/2

565/2

565/3

566

569/1 ए

568

567/2

567/3

567/4

588

589/4

589/3

589/2डी

589/1

587

582

581

593

598

594

520/28

518

655

662

663

666

667

668

451/1

451/2

450

452

453

456/1

456/2

454/2

467

466/1

466/2

464/1

464/2- 3

11 00 20

08 00 00

39 00 02

98 00

00 20

49 00 00

10 00 24

35 00 08

88 00

00 27

40 00

00 04

91 00 02

67 00

56 00 01

20 00

13.

00 36

77 00

71 00 00

45 00 77

98 00 02

34 00 36

64 :

00 28

29 00

00 08

22 00

00 11

25 00

97 00 03

56 00

25 00

70 00

08 00

6.1 00 05

55 00 1.0

20 00

24 00

09 3802

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13, 1931

2 1

463/4 3) चेब्रोलु (निरंतर)

463/3

463/2

463/1

461

462

416/1

417/2

417/1

418/4

418/5

418/7

407

381

379/5

379/4

379/6

379/3

378/4

378/5

378/3

377/303

377/302

377/304

377/301

377/1 ए

377/1ची

314/4

314/3बी

314/1

314/2

312/1

276

277/3

277/4

310/2

310/1वी

310/1 ए

277/6

277/5

307/1

307/2

[Part II -Sec. 3 ( ii) ] 3

28 00

17 00 05

00 10

94 00

23 00 00

10 00

12 15

84 00

04 05

31 00 06

65 00

23 00 06

09 00

76 00 03

70 00

34 01

23 00

38 00

75 17

00 02

25 00

76 04

49 00

02 04

00 16

97 00

15 00

65 00 02

29 00

96 12

87 00 33

64 00

62 00

78 00

38 00

83 44

49 00

10 00

00 02

50 20

25 00 00

10 00

20 20

40 [ भल II खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

TANSAD ант

भारत का सनपत्र बुलाई 4, 2009/आजार 13, 1931

307/3 3) पेत्रोयु (निरंतर) 00

306

282

305/5

305/3

305/4 30

304

303 60

301/2 80

301/1 10

00 00

300/2

300/3

300/4ए 20 00

300/4जी

300/5

334 20

05 00

336/3

337 00

338/1 ए

338/1बी

338/2 ΣΑ

462/1बी

00.

4) दुरगाडा

462/2वी

463

461/2वी

461/3बी

460/3

460/2

460/1

459/4

459/3 90

458/2 10

465

475

469/1 31

469/2 83

467/5 80 00

467/6 20 00

$0.

467/3 08

468/1 68

468/2 00 00

469/7

2287 G1/096

0.0.

01684

00 08

00 50

83 SIATS

00 05

00 88

89 50013

00 12

00 01

63 38213

75 isas

Mras

00 19

37 302

41 306

69 5310

84 SIDES

00 36

48 33011

00 12

52 33514

67 8334

.00

53415

59 MAES

00 07

30 53215

00 22

00 06

62 340

40 SUIS

87 SUUS

00 60

ESS

545

98 :

00 06

59 50315

00 24

43 505/30

00 08

91 503:3 3804

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ ASADHA 13 , 1931

469/9 4) दुरगाडा (निरंतर)

469/10

470

275

274/2

268

269/2

269/3

265/4

265/1

265/2

265/3

263/1

264

262/1

261/1

305

306

231/1

231/2

230/2

230/7

232/1

233/1

234/2

234/1

235/2

235/1

227

210

211/3

211/2

211/6

211/7

211/9

211/8

223

212

202/2

202/3वी

202/3ए

202/3सी

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii) ] 3

06 00

48 00

59 00

10 00 00

26 00

96 00

19 00

80 00 06

26 00 09

61 19

53 00

55 00

21 17

48 03

06 00

95 00

70 00 45

00 00

50 00

68 00

57 00

17 00

54 00

25 39

01 20

94 09

92 00 29

23 00 61

51 00

96 00

50 00

01 00 19

90 00 16

48 00

63 00 19

82 00

15 00

20 00 08

69 00

80 00

10 00

29 :

3805 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

213

03 4) दुरगाडा (निरंतर)

214/2/बी

214/1/बी

00 07

215

00 10

216

00 24

00 13

[फा. सं. एल-14014/20/2009-जी.पी.

के.के . शर्मा, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi , the 23rd June , 2009

S. O. 1852. Whereas it appears to Government of India that it is necessary in public interest that for transportation of natural gas from onshore terminal at east coast of Andhra Pradesh of M/s Reliance Industries Limited to consumers in various parts ofthe country, a pipeline should be laid by M/ s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited;

And whereas , it appears to Government of India that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in land under which the said pipeline isproposed to be laid and which are described in the Schedule annexed here to ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquire the Right ofUser therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of Right of User therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri K. Gangachalam , Competent Authority , Relogistics Infrastructure Limited , D.No. 67-11-21 /2 Savisuja, Opp New Centuary Public School , L.B. Nagar , Kakinada - 533003, East Godavari District , Andhra Pradesh State.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA JULY 4, 200WASABIA 13, 1931

3806

[Part II Sec. 3 ( ii) ]

Schedule

Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk: Samaikota

State: Andhra Pradesh

District: East Gedevari

Village

Area tobe acquired for ROU

Survey No./Sub-Division,No

2 1

108/3 1 ) Panasapadu

108/2

108/1

107

104/2A

104/2B

104/1

100/5B

100/40

000

100/1B

100/1A

2) P. Vemavaram

botimi i onotamakiin autobah

88 η μεραμεniebothersofpapukanap

відія мій піду of collant

61/1

60/1 Are

Hec

C-Are

0019 12

100

86&

3291

Th12

0015

001686

000sint 20

notion out Ha

to suossið sitt ni badalduq za

stm 59/3 Ikonng it or sideliava shain

59/4

33/2 001326

000475

00:

009 07116

03 07

02 3807

भारत को राजपत्र जुलाई 4, 2009/आपाड़ 1個, 1937ITINAD

1803

[भाग II- खण्ड3(fi) ]

ELEVAN

33/1

2) P.Vemavaram (Contd)

40 00

41/2

3) Unduru

41/1

42/2

36 00

42/1

0030

4) Samalkota :

538

10100

00 664301 00

540

542

12/1

84 5). Kapavaram Si

12/3

31 00

12/4

10/1

08 00

10/2

84 30

97 60

000

64 20

18/2

23/2

23/1

371

6) Pavara

375

368

43 00

374

٢٤

367/3

78 00

348

347

342

341/1

340/1

339/1

63 3808

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

2 6) Pavara(Contd)

338/1

335

334/1

334/2

333

323/10

323/9

323/7

322

315/2

311

District: fast Gedeveri

Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk: Pithapuram

101/3D 1) Somavaram

101 /3C

101/3B

100/2

100/1

100/3

99/2

99/1

98/6

98/4 2) Kandrada

14/ 1E

14/1F

14/5C

14/4A

14/4B

14/4C

14/5A

14/3B

14/6

18/6

18/7E

24/10A

24/10B

24/10C

24/9

24/8B

24/ 7E

24/7D

[Part II-Sec. 3(ii) ] 3

12 94

State:Andhra Pradesh

01 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3809

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

2 1

24/ 7C 2) Kandrada (Contd)

24/6

24/8A

25/2

25/1

44/9

44/6

44/3

44/2A

44/2B

44/2C

44/1

40/4

58/4

58/2D

58/2C

58/1A

58/2A

68/1

68/2

65/19

65/17

65/15

65/16

65/14

65/7

65/8

65/9

96/2D

93/5

93/4

93/ 1E

93/1G

93/1D

93/1C

93/3

93/2

94/4

94/6A

94/6B 4

03 52

00 08

04 47

00 00 88

01 3810

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4 , 2009/ASADHA 13, 1931

2 2) Kandrada(Contd)

96/3E

96/3F

96/3G

96/1J

96/ 1K

96/ 1L

96/ 1G

96/1H

96/21

96/1F

96/2J

96/ 1E

96/1D

96/2L

96/2M

96/1C

96/1B

96/1A

149

152

151

32 3) Kumarapuram

28/1

28/6

28/2

26/6

26/1B

26/2A

26/2B

26/2C

26/3

26/ 1A

21/5

21/6

21/4

21/3

19/2

17 4) Pithapuram

[Part II Sec. 3 ( ii)] 3

66 भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

16 4) Pithapuram(Contd)

15/1

15/2

15/3

15/4

18/5

119

120

121

113

109

111

110

190

192

191

195

188

185

184

196

197/4

197/3

183/2

197/2

223/6

223/4

224/8

224/6

224/5

224/4

226

97 5) Agraharam

99/1

101/4

101 /5A

101/5B

101/6A 2287 G1/09-7

3811 3

02.

00 3812

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

2 5) Agraharam (Contd)

103/1

103/2

104/1

105/2

106

107

108

109

110/2

110/1

128/ 1B

128/ 1A

129/1

132/2

131

133/28

133/27

133/25

133/24

133/23

133/26

133/22

133/21

133/20

133/19

133/17

152/3

152/2

152/12

152/13

151.

284

6) Raparthi

285

349/6

349/5

351

347

350/2

350/1

352

375/2

375/1

[Part II Sec. 3( ii) ] 4

65 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/ आषाढ़ 13, 1931

376

6) Raparthi (Contd)

372

371

370/3

370/2

370/1

369/2

381/3

380

381/1

381/2

416/2 7) Bhogapuram

416/3

416/1

417

413/8

413/7

413/6

413/5

413/4

413/2

410/3

410/4

410/6

411

409

432/2

432/1

432/3

433/3

433/4

431/3

431/2

431/1

435/1

436/2

436/1

437/1

437/2

439

289/3

289/4

3813 3

'73

07 3814

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4 , 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

2 7) Bhogapuram ( Contd)

289/5

289/9

289/8

289/10

289/11

288/6

288/1

254/6

254/4

254/2

254/1

258/4

258/5

258/3

257

256/1

256/2

260/3

260/2

260/1

261/1

262/3C

262/3B

262/2

262/1B

262/ 1A

265/4

243/1

242/ 2A

242/2B

242/2C

242/1

217/1

217/2

216/2

216/3

215

196/2

196/1

197/1A

197/ 1B

197/ 1C

[Part II- Sec . 3 ( ii) ] 3

00.

28 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3815

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

198/5A 7) Bhogapuram (Contd)

198/5B

198/2

-198/3

202/1

201/2

201/1

201/7

200/1

200/2

150/4

150/5

149/5

149/6

149/4

149/3

149/2

148

District : East Godavari Mandal / Tehsil /Taluk: Gollaprolu

593/10 1) Gollaprolu

593/4

593/8

593/7

593/6

593/5

593/2A

593/2B

593/2C

592/2

592/1

5/1

5/2

5/3

5/4

12/1

11/2

11/6

10/1

01. 11

State: Andhra Pradesh

09 3816

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4 , 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

27/3 1) Gollaprolu (Contd)

80/3

80/4

-76

46/2

46/1

47/2

47/1

49/1

50/1

51/2

51/3

54/7

54/5

54/4

54/1

54/2

54/3

55/12

55/10

55/11

59/2

57/1/6

57/1/7

57/1/8

605/5 2) Chendurti

605/4

606/3

606/2

606/1

607

562

3) Chebrolu

561/4

560/2

560/1

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii) ] 3

00-

.51

16 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3817

भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

2 1

561/1 3) Chebrolu (Contd)

561/2

565/2

565/3

566

569/1A

568

-567/2

567/3

567/4

588

589/4

589/3

589/2D

589/1

587

582

581

593

598

594

520/28

518

655

662

663

666

667

668

451/1

451/2

450

452

453

456/1

456/2

454/2

467

466/1

466/2

464/1

464/2 3

.05

03 3818

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4 , 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

2 3) Chebrolu ( Contd)

463/4

463/3

463/2

463/1

461

462

416/1

417/2

417/1

418/4

418/5

418/7

407

381

379/5

379/4

379/6

379/3

378/4

378/5

378/3

377/3A3

377/3A2

377/3A4

377 /3A1

377/ 1A

377/ 1B

314/4

314/3B

314/1

314/2

312/1

276

277/3

277/4

310/2

310/ 1B

310/1A

277/6

277/5

307/1

307/2

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii)] 3

40 भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

3819

भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

307/3 3) Chebrolu ( Contd)

306

282

305/5

305/3

305/4

304

303

301/2

301/1

300/2

300/3

300/4A

300/4B

300/5

334

336/3

337

338/ 1A

338/1B

338/2

462/ 1B 4) Durgada

462/2B

463

461/2B

461/3B

460/3

460/2

460/1 :

459/4

459/3

458/2

465

475

469/1

469/2

467/5

467/6

467/3

468/1

468/2

469/7 2287 G1 /098

00 3820

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4 , 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

469/9 4) Durgada (Contd)

469/10

470

275

274/2

268

269/2

269/3

265/4

265/1

265/2

265/3

263/1

264

262/1

261/1

305

306

231/1

231/2

230/2

230/7

232/1

233/1

234/2

234/1

235/2

235/1

227

210

211/3

211/2

211/6

211/7

211/9

211/8

223

212

202/2

202/3B

202/ 3A

202/3C

[Part II--Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

29 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3819

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13 , 1931

2 1

307/3 3) Chebrolu (Contd)

306

282

305/5

305/3

305/4

304

303

301/2

301/1

300/2

300/3

300/4A

300/4B

300/5

334

336/3

337

338/1A

338/1B

338/2

462/1B 4) Durgada

462/2B

463

461/2B

461/3B

460/3

460/2

460/1

459/4

459/3

458/2

465

475

469/1

469/2

467/5

467/6

467/3

468/1

468/2

469/7 2287 G1 /09-8

00 3820

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4 , 2009/ ASADHA 13 , 1931

469/9 4) Durgada (Contd)

469/10

470

275

274/2

268

269/2

269/3

265/4

265/1

265/2

265/3

263/1

264

262/1

261/1

305

306

231/1

231/2

230/2

230/7

232/1

233/1

234/2

234/1

235/2

235/1

227

210

211/3

211/2

211/6

211/7

211/9

211/8

223

212

202/2

202/3B

202/3A

202/3C

[Part II--Sec . 3( ii) ] 3

23.

05 20

00 3821 [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

213

4) Durgada (Contd)

214/2/B

214/ 1 /B

215

10 45

216

00 48

[F. No. L -14014/20/2009-G.P. K.K.SHARMA , Under Secy.

नईदिल्ली, 23 जून , 2009

का. आ. 1853. भारत सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रप्तीत होता है कि मैसर्स रिलाएन्स इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के आन्ध्रप्रदेश में पूर्वीतट पर ऑनशोर टरमिनल से देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए, मैसर्स रिलोजिसटिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और, भारत सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि, उस भूमि में , जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अव, भारत सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के लिए उपायोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के संबंध में श्री के . गंगाचलम सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मैसर्स रिलोजिसटिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड, न. 67-11-21/2, साविसुजा, न्यु सेंचुरी पब्लिक स्कूल के सामने , एल वी नगर, काकिनाडा- 533003, पूर्वी गोदावरी जिला, आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 3822

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

अनुसूची

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii) ] राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला: पूर्वी गोदावरी

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: काजुलूरू

सर्वे सं . / सथ डिविजन सं.

गाँव का नाम

2 1

615

1) फ्ल्लेपालेम

618/7

614/1

613

619/1

619/2

618/3

618/2

618/1

623

620/1

622

630

632

633/ 2बी

633/1

646/2ए

646/1

645/2

645/1

664/3

664/1

665

667

321

2) शीला

325/7

330/2

330/1

355

356/2वी

363

361

357

360/4

347

346/3

346/4 आर. ओ. यू. अर्जित करने केलिए क्षेत्रफल हेक्टेयर

एयर सिएयर

5 3

28 00

71 00

92 00

10 00

55 00

00 00

33 00

59 00

67 00

65 00

48 00

37 00

00 00

83 00

15 00

29 00

59 00

35 00

10 3823

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़13, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

346/1 2) शीला (निरंतर)

232/2

232/1

231/4

231/3

231/2

230

228/2/1वी

228/2/1 ए

228/1/1

229/3

227/2/1

227/1/3

227/1/2

224

225

226/1

226/2

62/9

62/8

62/5

62/4

62/6

62/3

62/2

62/1

65/6

56/9

56/7

56/6

55/1

53/1

52/3.

48. 3

33 00

13 00

71 00

88 01

06 00

37 00

46 00

21 00

12 00

03.

24 00

91 00

06 00

64 00

28 00

51 00

66 00

86 00

76 00

17 00

48 00

15.

37. 00

51 00

60 00

45 00

14 00

11 00

41 3824

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ ASADHA 13 , 1931

227/6 3) मंजेरू

227/1

229/5

229/2

229/1

230

63/2

63/1

62/9

62/8 वी

62/3 ए

62/1वी

62/1 ए

61/13

61/12

53/2

53/1/3

53/1/2

52/12

52/11

52/8

52/7

299/13 4) बंदनपूडी

299/12

299/7

299/6

299/4

299/2

300/6

300/5

300/4

300/3

301/3

301/4

301/1

302

303/3

303/2

305/9

305/8

305/6

305/7

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii) ] 3

5 00

47 00

41 00

01 00

22 00

84 00

51 00

21 00

11 00

10 00

14 00

02 00

93 00

92 00

49 00

36 00

89 00

33 00

69 00

51 00

43 00

68 00

39 00

92 00

51 00

58 00

99 00

31 00

78 00

98 00

57 00

81 00

05 00

06 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13 , 1931

306/3 4) बंदनपूडी (निरंतर)

306/2

306/1बी

306/1 ए

309/13

309/12

309/11

309/10.

309/9

309/6

308

329/2

95/2 5) सालपाका

95/3

94/2

98/2

98/1

115

116/2

116/1

117/3

117/1

117/2

119/4

119/3

119/2

120

121

122/3

131

132/2

142

143

132/1

141/3

141/1

144

140

139/5

139/2

139/3

3825

5 3

46 00

33 00

94 00

10 00

84 00

66 00

23.

59 00

35 00

77 00

82 00

59 00

56 00

20 00

43 00

05 00

23 00

20 00

72 00

23 00

08 00

04 00

88 00

19 00

59 00

78 00

95 00

00 3826

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

139/1

5) सालपाका (निरंतर)

138/3

138/2

138/1 ए

138/1बी

153/9

137/1

137/2

153/4

153/2

153/1

169

168/6

168/4

168/2

168/1

174

167/11

167/3

167/2

167/1

166/2वी

166/1

161/5

161/3

165

164/3

164/2

164/1

163

जिला:पूर्वी गोदावरी मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: करपा

250

1 ) गोर्रेपूडी

251

249/2

249/1

237/2

237/1

220

236

235

221/10

221/9

221/2

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii) ] 3

5 00

59 00

00 00

67 00

15 00

0.0

28 00

78 00

61 00

76 00

09 00

83 00

35 00

70 00

04 00

61 00

57 00

01 00

06 00

27 00

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

87 00

69 00

90 00

20 00

40 00

15 00

00 3827

भारत का राबपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

[भाग IH-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

221/3 1) गोरेपूडी (निरंतर)

221/4

221/5

219/5

219/6

219/7

219/16

219/11

219/8

219/9

219/10

218/13

218/12

218/8

218/9

218/7

218/6

214

212

207

206

189

188/5

188/4

191/7

191/5

188/3

188/2

191/4

191/3

191/2

191/1

192/2

192/1

193

194

181 2) कोंगोडु

180/2

180/1

172

171

165/3 2287 G1/09-9

5 3

81 00

34 : 00

42 00

50 00

09.

03 00

47 00

94 00

73 00 .

77 00

10 00

61 00

00 00

46 00

92 00

40 00

05 00

53.

62 00

52 00

10 00

02 00

99 00

68 00

19 00

92 00

08 00

10 00

45 00

00 5

164

16/12

196/2

148

1405

14644

140/8

140/2

14716

140/1

14754

147/3

147/2

147/1

15 64

03/2

63/28

60/16

62/6

62/4

20/1

80/2

63 01/1

03 92

45 79

80/2

76/2

76/

38888 00

75/24

70 74

43 ・ 2

1212

12/8

11/3

6/7

0/4

6/3

612

0/1

11 5)

143

147

141/1

137/,2वी

137/20

13TM

186

13417

134/6

101/8

1945

113144

19444

104/3

181/3

131/2

183

130/M

180/8 00

مم

40 00

10 00

000

AD 107 58

115

0000 100 20 6000

118.

000 3830

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4 , 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

2 1

130/2

5) कोरूपल्ले (निरंतर)

132/2

132/1

128/13

127

129/12

129/14

129/9

129/13

129/2

129/1

92/3

95/2

95/1

96/1

98/3

98/1 ए

98/1वी

98/2

100/2

109/6

105

101/15एफ

101/15 इ

101/14

101/11

101/2

101/1

103/3

103/2

107

106

110/3

6) जड . बाबराम

110/4

110/2

112

114

113/2

113/1

119

117/2

117/1

[Part II Sec . 3 ( ii) ]

5 3

92 00

32 00

82 00

20 00

38 00

74 00

61 00

62 00

04-

20 00

83 00

33 00

52 00

09 00

31 00

10 00

49 00

79 00

99 00

21 00

00 भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आपाड़ 13, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

118

6) जड. बावराम (निरंतर)

126/2

124/3

122/2

123

124/1

134

142/1

143/1

143/2

140

145/4

145/3

145/2

145/1

152

149/1

149/2

150/1

255/2 7) अरटलकटटा

260/3

259/4

259/3

259/2

259/1

203/4

203/3

20-2

275/6

275/4

203/1

203/2

276/4

276/3

278/2

278/1

277

281

280

279/1

194/1

194/2

381 3

5 00

こ

04 00

73 00

03 06 00

10 00

32 00

40 00

57 00

07.

52 00

25 00

08 00

10 00

70 00

76 00

18 00

95 00

69 00

51 00

94 00

86 THE GAZETTE OF

¥4,

193

192/4

326/2

192/2

192/1

327

32/4

187/3

187/2

187/1

186

343

344/2

344/1

50/

50/4

50/1

50/3

51/7

51/8

52/12

52/5

52/3

52/1

52/2

35/4

35/8

35/6

35/5

36/3

36/2

30/1

36/1

5/5

7/3

37 00

52 00

16 00

56 00

96 00

83 00

10 00

95 00

27 00

77 00

22 00

84 33

11 2

7/1

5/4

5/1

2/3

2/4

2/1

मंडल/ तेविल/ तालुक भेदपूडी

जिला उपूर्वी मोदावरी

136 1) करत

133/14वी

133/1

133/4

133/10बी

133/12

238 2) अनुत

237/2बी

237/182

236/11

237// :

236/

236/20/1

235/183

235/11

235/12

235/1ए

240

241

242/10

242/9

242/5

242/4

245/6

245/5

245/4

245/1

244

253

254/1

256/4

247/9

247/10

248/19 13, 1931

3833 3

5 00

01 DD

45 00

90 00

10 00

20 00

35 00

राज्य आन्ध्रप्रदेश

10 00

45 00

70 00

05 00

65. 00

54 00

70 00

85 00

42 00

00 00

17 80

50 20

40 00

10 00

11 00

91 00

35 00

44 08

96 00

32 00

74 B0

42 50

92 3834

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

2 1

248/8

2) अच्युतापुरतयन (निरंतर)

248/5

248/4

248/2

252/4

252/7

252/6

252/1

251/14

251/13

251/12

251/11

251/10

280/1

284

287/2

288

289/2

290

385

299

383

300/1

382/2

381/10

301/1

380

377

302

371

372/1

372/2

374/8

373

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक:सामलकोटा

[Part II Sec. 3 (ii) ]

5 00

40 00

60 00

00.

49 00

62 00

54 00

81 00

91 00

27 00

57 00

25 00

11 00

71 00

46 00

61 00

12 00

87 01

67 00

81 राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला: पूर्वी गोदावरी

165/12 1) नाथक्पटनग

160/16

160/17

166

165/16

165/13

165/6

165/5

72 00

79 00

15 00

34 3835

भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/ आपाड़ 13, 1931

162/2 1) (लरतर)

165/4

164/1/2

164/1/1

158

156/1

155/2

155/1

148

146/2ए

145/2बी

146/1

146/2

144/1

144/2

4714 2) कोम

48/1

49/6

49/5

49/2

51/2

51/3

67/5

67/6

68/5

68/2

6:8/3

84/3

9712

95/1ए

95/2ची

97/1जी

97/1एफ

97/15

99/4 2287 G1/09-10

00:

54:

02 00

10 00

48 00

13 00

13.

35 00

02 00

51.

52. 00

45:

35 00

78 00

10 00

75 00

44: 40

85 00

13 00

10 00

30 00

55 00

10 00

01:

00.

55 00

00 3836

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ 1

99/5

2) बोयनपूडि (निरंतर)

4/1

3) मांमिल्लदोड्डी

4/2

5/1

6/3

5/2

सर्वे नंबर 10 में

18/2/4

18/2/3

18/2

18/1

31/3

28/2

28/1

29/1

29/2

29/3

50/1

76/2/ 2बी

76/1

77/1

77/2

161

4) वल्लूरू

160/4

160/3

159/2

158/1

158/2

157/ 2सी ΙΑ 13, 1931

[Part II-Sec. 3( ii) ] 3

5 00

30 00

78 00

75 00

51 00

72 00

04 00

39 00

15 00

13 00

48 00

49 00

06 00

52 00

39 00

74 00

58 00

95 00

79 00

74 00

09 00

59 00

11 00

-13

26 3837

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/ आषाढ़ 13, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड3 ( ii) ]

157/2ए 4) बल्लूर (निरंतर)

157/1

156/2

152

151/3

151/4ए

151/1डी

151/1की

151/1 ए

150/ 1 सी 1

150/1बी

148/3

150/1 ए

148/1

146

145/9

145/5

145/3

144/2

143/2

143/1

5 3

57 00

86 00

92 00

00 00

10 00

28 00

40 00

.70

71 00.

92 00

12 58

76 00

39 00

16 00

[पत्र. सं. एल-14014/20/2009-जी.पी.

के.के. शर्मा, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 23rd June,2009

S. O. 1853. Whereas it appears to Government of India that it is necessary in public interest that for the transportation of natural gas from onshore terminal at east coast of Andhra Pradesh of M/s Reliance Industries Limited to consumers in various parts of the country, a pipeline should be laid by M/s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited;

And whereas, it appears to Government of India that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in land under which the said pipeline is proposedto be laid and which are described in the Schedule annexed here to;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquire the Right of User therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of Right of User therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri K. Gangachalam, Competent Authority, Relogistics Infrastructure Limited , D.No. 67-11- 21/2 Savisuja, Opp New Centuary Public School , L.B. Nagar, Kakinada 533003, East Godavari District , Andhra Pradesh State.

3838

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 200MABADIA 13 , 1931

Schedule Mandal/Tehell/TelukQURU

Survey the.Sub

615

1) PALLEPALEM

618/7

614/1

613

619/1

619/2

618/3

618/2

618/1 :

623 :

620/1

622

630

632

633/2B

633/1

646/2A

646/1

645/2

645/1

664/3

664/1

665

667

321

2) SILA

325/7

330/2

330/1

355

354/28

363

361

357

360/4

347

346/3

346/4

[Part II-Sec.3(ii)]

quired for Re

C-Are

Ave

16 00

10 00

76 00

92 00

42 00

10 00

55 00

32 00

00 00

44 00

09 00

14 00

市

35 00

C31

श्री पी.

भारत का नाम:: 909/13 , 1933

[भाग -3 )

2 2) SILA(Cound)

346/1

232/2

232/1

231/4

231/3

231/2

230

228/2/18

228/2/1A

228/1/1

229/3

227/2/1

227/1/3

227/1/2

224

225

226/1

226/2

62/9

62/8

62/5

6244

62/6

62/3

62/2

62/1

65/6

56/9

56/7

56/6

55/1

53/1

52/3

888

71 00

88 01

32 00

56 00

64 00

37 00

46 00

21 00

12 00

38 00

91 00

06 00

64 00

28 00

51 00

B00288 03 22

54 00

75 00

17 00

72 00

48 00

06 00

37 00

51 00

58 00

60 00

45 00

98 00

14 00

10 00

41 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

227/6 3) MANJERU

227/1

229/5

229/2

229/1

230

63/2

63/1

62/9

62/8B

62/3A

62/1B

62/ 1A

61/13

61/12

53/2

53/1/3

53/1/2

52/12

52/11

52/8

52/7

299/13 4) BHANDANAPUDI

299/12

299/7

299/6

299/4

299/2

300/6

300/5

300/4

300/3

301/3

301/4

301/1

302

303/3

303/2

305/9

305/8

305/6

305/7

Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii) ]

5 3

47 00

67 00

01 00

88 00

22 00

84 00

51 00

11 00

10 00

02 00

51 00

43 00

68 00

92 00

88 00

58 00

99 00

64 00

78 00

58 00

57 00

97 00

06 00

013 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

3841

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/ ऑयदि 13, 1931

2 4) BHANDANA ODI ( COM

306/3

306/2

306/ 1B

306/1A

309/13

309/12

309/11

309/10

309/9

309/6

308

329/2

95/2

5) SALAPAΚΑ

95/3

94/2

98/2

98/1

115

116/2

116/1

117/3

117/1

117/2

119/4

119/3

119/2

120

121

122/3

131

132/2

142

143

132/1

144/3

344/1

144

140

139/5

139/2

139/3 3

46 00

82 00

10 00

12 00

94 00

10 00

84 00

66 00

68 00

09 00

87 00

77 00.

82 00

59 00

56 00

20 00

06 00

43 00

05 00

66 00

23 00

20 00

26 00

72 00

25 00

23 00

08 00

46 00

47 00

88 00

10 00

39 00

19 00

59 00

97 00

78 00

95 00

00 GAZETTE OF

139/1

138/3

138/2

138/ 1A

138/ 1B

153/9

137/1

137/2

153/4

153/2

153/1

169

168/6

168/4

168/2

168/1

174

167/11

167/3

167/2

167/1

166/2B

166/1

161/5

161/3

165

164/3

1:64/2

164/1

163

Mandal /Tehall/Taluk

250

1) GORREPUDI

251

249/2

249/1

237/2

237/1

220

236

235

221/10

221/9

221/2

13, 1931

55 00

59 00

57 00

67 00

15 00

28 00

02 00

76 00

06 00

95 00

83 00

35 00

70 00

61 00

71 00

27 00

39 00

61 00

40 00

15 00

47 00

00 9643

भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/ आषाढ़ 13,

13, 1931

[ र - आड 3(ii)]

221/3 1) GORDERLUDI (Gened)

221/4

221/5

219/5

219/6

219/7

219/16

219/11

219/8

219/9

219/10

218/13

218/12

218/8

218/9

218 18/7

218/6

214

212

207

206

189

108/5

198/4

191/7

191/5

168/3

188/2

191/4

191/3

191/2

191/1

192/2

192/1

193

194

181

2) KONGODU

180/2

180/1

172

171

165/3 2287 G/09-11

81 00

800

000

29 00:

000

42 00

$50

00:

100

001

03 00

47 000

94 : 000

73 00

10 000

$00

001

00:

07 46 100

116

00:

440

593

62 00

200

19 00%

52 00:

00%

442

202

62 00

$10

102 00%

00%

000

228 $00

$10

66 00:

89%

76 00:

19 00:

$00

92 00:

00:

08 $00

$00

30 00

100

00,

445 00

13 00

55 3844

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ ASADHA 13 , 1931

2) KONGODU ( Contd)

164

163/5

163/2/4

163/2/5

163/2/3

163/2/2

163/1/7

163/1/12

163/1/11

163/1/8

163/1/5

150/2 3) PATARLAGADDA

150/1

149

148/5

148/4

148/3

148/2

147/6

148/1

147/5

147/4

147/3

147/2

147/1

63/2B

63/2A

63/1D

63/ 1A

62/5

62/4 4) KARAPA

89/1

89/2

91/1

80/2

76/2C

76/1C

75/3C

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii)] 3

50 00

12 00

67 00

40 00

02 00

90 00

52 00

88 00

24 00

01 00

42 00

79 00

21 00

34 00

73 00

01 00

27 00

63 00

04 00

45 00

00 00

10 00

85 00

43 [ भाग II- खण्ड3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

4) KARAPA ( Contd)

71/2

72/2

12/3

11/3

6/9

6/8

6/7

6/4

6/3

6/2

6/1

7/3

7/2

7/1

144/1 5) KORUPALLE

143

147

141/4

141/1

137/4

137/2B

137/2A

137/1

136

135/2B

135 /2A

134/7

134/6

131/8

134/5

131/4

134/4

134/3

131/3

131/2

133

130/4

130/3

3845

5 00

62 00

87 00

17 00

14 00

35 00

90 00

87 00

66 00

99 00

19 00

73 00

10 00

40 00

15 00

84 00

94 00

10 00

61 00

74 00

70 00

41 00

08 00

52 00

67 00

84 00

02 00

72 00

20 00

22 00

00 00

88 00

01 3846

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADNA 13 , 1931

130/2 5) KORUPALLE (Contd)

132/2

132/1

128/13

127

129/12

129/14

129/9

129/13

129/2

129/1

92/3

95/2

95/1

96/1

98/3

9841A

98/1B

90/2

100/2

109/6

105

101/ 15F

101/ 15E

101/14

101/11

101/2

101/1

103/3

103/2

107

106

110/3 6) Z.BHAVARAM

110/4

110/2

112

114

113/2

113/1

119

117/2

117/1

[Part II See:3 (4 ) ] 3

5 00

92 00

85 00

30 00

10 00

32 00

82 00

48 00

51 00

35 00

51 00

38 00

74 00

61 00

10 00

62 00

18-

84 00

19 00

20. 00

94 00

83 00

44. 00

33 00

19 00

52 00

09 00

10 00

79 00

99.

78 00

09-

86 00

06 00

01 P

118 6) Z.BEAMARANT(Conted)

126/2

124/3

122/2

123

124/1

134

142/1

143/1

143/2

140

145/4

145/3

145/2

145/1

152

149/1

149/2

150/1

255/2 7) ARATLAKATTA

260/3

299/4

259/3:

259/2

259/1

203/4

20/3

202

275/6

275/4

203/1

203/2

276/4

276/3

278/2

278/1

277

281

280.

279/1

194/1

194/2

3847

5 3

43 00

04 00

డి

33 00

16 00

43 00

40 00

07 00

80 00

25 00

0.0

27 100

10 00

67 00

95 00:

14 00

$00

22 00

07 3848

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4 , 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

193

7) ARATLAKATTA( Contd)

192/4

326/2

192/2

192/1

327

328/4

187/3

187/2

187/1

186

343

344/2

344/1

60/ 1A

50/4

50/1

50/3

51/7

51/8

52/12

52/6

52/3

52/1

52/2

35/4

35/8

35/6

35/5

36/3

36/2

35/1

36/1

5/5

7/3

[Part II-Sec. 3(ii)]

5 00

37 00

73 00

16 00

10 00

56 00

98 00

83 00

95 00

79 00

68 00

07 00

98 00

1,0 00

49 00

05 00

42 00

28 00

47 00

38 00

87 00

21 00

06 00

81 00

57 00

09 00

10 00

95 00

48 00

89 00

10 3849

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

2 1

7/1

7) ARATLAKATTA (Coutd)

5/4

5/1

2/3

2/4

2/1

District: EAST GODAVARI

Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk : PEDAPUDI

136

1) KARAKUDURU

133/14B

133/1

133/4

133/10B

133/12

238

2) ACHYUTAPURATRIAM

237/2B

237/1B2

236/ 1B1

237/ 1B/ 1C

236/ 1A

236/2B/ 1

235/1B3

235/1B2

235/1B1

235/ 1A

240

241

242/10

242/9

242/5

242/4

245/6

245/5

245/4

245/1

244

253

254/1

256/4

247/9

247/10

248/10

5 3

01 00

45 00

80 00

90 00

10 00

State: ANDHRA PRADESH

22 00

45 00

70 00

05 00

54 00

68 00

55 00

42 00

17 00

40 00

10 00

80 00

11 00

35 00

04 00

00 00

15 00

96 00

57 00

95 00

87 00

74 00

18 3850

THE GAZETTE OF INEMA : ALY4, 13 , 1931

2 2) ACHYUTAPURATRIAM (Cant

246/5

248/4

248/2

252/4

252/7

252/6

252/1

251/14

251/13

251/12

251/11

251/10

200/1

284

287/2

288

289/2

290

385

299

383

300/1

382/2

381/10

301/1

300

377

302

371

372/1

372/2

374/8

373

Mandal/Tabell/Talui

165/12 1 ) MADHAVAPATNAM

160/16

160/17

166

105/16

105/13

165/6

165/5

Part II Soc.3()] 3

78 00

39 00

27 00

60 00

09 00

63 00

51 00

49 00

62 00

54 00

71 00

50 00

25 00

87 01

RADESH

34 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3851

भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/ आषाढ़ 13, 1931

2 1 ) MADHAVAPATNAM ( Contd)

162/2

165/4

164/1/2

164/1/1

158

156/1

155/2

155/1

148

145/2A

145/2B

146/1

146/2

144/1

144/2

47/4 2) ΒΟΥΑΝΑPUDI

48/1

49/6

49/5

49/2

51/2

51/3

67/5

67/6

68/5

68/2

68/3

84/3

97/2

95/1A

95/2B

97/1G

97/1F

97 / 1E

99/4

2287 G1/09-12

5 00

54 00

02 .00

10 00

91 00

10 00

48 00

75 00

38 00

13 00

23 00

52 00

13 00

77 00

48 00

35 00

10 00

75 00

40 00

24 00

37 00

33 00

10 00

30 00

10 00

66 00

26 00

55 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : ALYA, 3852

2 1

2) BOYANAPUDH (Coul )

99/5

4/1

3) MANILLADOLIDE

4/2

6/3

5/2

In Sivy. No.10

10/2/4

16/3/3

18/2

18/1

34/3

20/2

20/1

29/1

29/2

29/3

50/1

76/1

77/8

77/2

368 4) VALLURU

360/4

160/3

199/2

190/1

190/2

157/20

70 11

30 01

78 33

89 14

52 07

58 21

8 23

99 13

11 13

26 2

157724

15771

156/2

152

151/3

151/44

151/10

151/18

151/14

150/ 1CT

150/18

148/3

150/1A

148/1

146

114

145/9

145/5

145/3

144/2

143/2

143/1

नईदिल्ली, 25 जून, 2009

जांत्र प्रदेश में नियास्थित टैप आप प्ाइंट से देश के विभिन्तकः प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए नैसरिलोस्ट्रमरनिकई काली करिए

और भारत सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए वह प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में, जिसकेी भीतर उक्त पाइफकाइन विछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना के उद्धअनुसूम में वर्णित हैं, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जक किया जाए;

अतः, अय, भारत सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार (1962 का 56) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शर्मा अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है; अर्जन अधिनियम, 1962 उनके उपयोग के अधिकार का कोई व्मानित, जो उगत अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से अधिक की बात 3 की उपकान (1.) के अधीन जारी की गई अधिसूचना की प्रतिमा साधारण जनता को उपलव्ध काल की जाती हैं, इनकीस दिन के भीलन भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन विध्छाई जाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकेके श्री एक.ए. भारत प्राधिकारी, मैसर्स स्लिोजिसटिषस इन्फ्रास्ट्क्वर लिमिटेड, न. 55-1-18/ स्टेला कॉलेज के सामने की तेह में, वन रूट न.5, समचन्द्रा नगर, विजयवाडा-52000-8, कृष्णा जिला, आम्प्रदेश को लिजिएको भेज सबीनाः । 3854

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची

जिला:कृष्णा मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: कालीडीन्डी

सर्वे सं. / सब विविजन सं .

गाँव का नाम

2 1

1) कोन्डंगी

गट नंबर 1 में उप्पटेरू नदी

2) अमरावती

127

3) कालीडीन्डी

128

132

133

136

137

138

154

155

172

173

174

645

654

655

656

657

660

661

794

796

806

807

812

813

830

854

855

856

857

858

गज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए बेतफल

एयर सि एयर हेक्टेयर

5 3

70 00 03

03 00

28 00

75 00 11

28 00 03

69 00 52

00 29

16 00

95 00

94 00

79 00

21 00

38 00

83 00 04

60 00

29 00

43 00

11 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

863

3 ) कालीहीडी (निरंतर)

1004

1007

1008

1009

1010

1017

1018

1019

1020

1021

1022

1023

1218

1219

1222

1223

12.24

1228

1229

1230

1231

1232

1233

1249

1250

1251

1271

1272

1273

1274

1276

1277

413

4) सनारुद्रावरम

414

415

416

417

418

419

420

421

3855 3

5 00

47 00

76 00 10

57 00

14 00 43

36 00

12 00

84 00

64 00 04

20 00 25

33 00

53 00 39

24 00

45 00 00

89 00. 20

00 02

75 00

06 00 42

55 00

43 00

46 00

11 00

99 00

87 00

98 00

36 00

08 00

50 00

60 00

71 00

22 24

00 35

25 00 19

95 00

32 00

24 00

59 00

85 00

16 3856

THE GAZETTE Ο

422

4) सनारपदावरम (निरंतर)

423

424

425

426

428

5 ) कोरुवातेल्लु

339

340

344

345

359

360

361

367

371

372

373

374

375

377

378

379

380

381

382

383

384

386

6) अवाकुल

मट नंबर 9 में धर्म चेश्व

मट नंवर 48 में नाला

Past S

5 3

22 00

58 00 06

90 45

54 00

40 00

00 28

24 00 49

96 00 19

67 00 21

19 90

71 00

18 00 40

37 0:0

72 00

24 00 04

40 65

87 00

70 00 20

23 00

28 00 84

66 00

36 0-0

00 07

16 00 50

76 00

62 00 00

00 04 2

109

113

116

128

122

123

124

125

127

3857

83 00

00 05

97 00

00 07

47 00 41

31 00 34

26 00 00

00 28

15 00

65 DO

51 00

87 09 10

राज्य आन्ध्र प्रदेश

26 00

09 01

51 00 44

36 00 45

89 00 28

70 00

81 00 36

38 00

22 06

65 00

53 00 38

00 32

51 3858

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009 /ASADHA 13, 1931

423

2) बोम्मिनमपाडु

426

432

435

443

445

452

461

468

121

3 ) कोर्रगुन्टपालेम

125

134

135

139

4) ईडेपल्ले

[Part II Sec . 3 (ii ) ] 3

.00

56 00 07

99 00

11 00

20 00

41 00

92 00

27 00 46

57 00

00 98

47 00

13 00

गट नंबर 52 में नदी

06 00

29 00

गट नंबर 53 में नदी

40 00

16 00

गट नंबर 62 में नदी

5 ) पेदगोन्नूरू

33 00

49 00

51 00 44

09 00 16

34 00

29 00

98 00

89 00 42

44 00

77 00

63 00

53 00 26

72 00 27

19 00

83 00 09

02 00

44 [भाग खण्डअ

3859

भारतका राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/ माणाड़ 13, 1931

5) पेवणोनरंतर

46-

5 00 29 08 00 08 54 00 25.

76 00 08. 86 00 76

47 00 30

44 00

57 00

2.7 00. 15

गट नंबर 62 में पेदावल्किा चेरूव

564

570

571

572

573

577

578

579

580

581

586

6)कोम

160/7

161

162

167

172/1

7) चेवूल

00 円 26

10 00

50 00 10

12 00 34

18 01: 98

58 00

68 00 08

63 00 15

64 00: 07

00 00 39: 54:

00 .... 13

22號 00 85

25 00

14 00 27

77 00 44

45 00

86:

00 22

25 00 05

43 00

01 00 01

33 00 64

51% 01

01.

38 00 41

10 00 00원 11

गट नंबर 92 में चेस्व

00 00 : 10 00 26 31 000 01- 35- 00

गट नंबर 43 में तलाव

45:

2287 01/09 19

00 . 01

87 00

63 00% 51 98 000 34

093- 00 05.0 24 3860

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2000MASADHA 13 , 1931

7) चेवूरू )

गट नंबर 49 में नाला

101

102

103

106

107

109

110

8) काकरवाडा

गट नंबर 2 में नाला

गट नंबर 3 में नाला

359

9 ) मुदीनेपस्थित

360

362

363

366

गट नंवर 369 में नामा [Part II-Sec.3(ii)] 3

16 00

00 04

79 01

55 00

37 00 00

21 00 00

64 00

51 00

43 00

08 00

13 00 30

64 00 02

80 00

00 00

12 00 00

10 00

11 00 03

91 00

91 00 27

47 00 36 91

51 00

22 00

00 09

50 00 42

95 00 42

23 00 20

82 00

00 49

99 00 22

03 00 23 08 00

00 02

66 [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

3861

भारत का राजपत्र : बुलाई 4, 2009/ आपाड़ 13, 1931

372

9) मुधीनेपाल (निरंतर)

373

374

376

377

378

379

382

388

391

393

394

395

10) पेनुमस्लि

92.

102

103

108

120

121

122

123

124

14 00 08

88 00

97 00

82 00

74 00 30

54 00

04 00

00 07

49 00

50 00

00 06

38 00 03

34 00

78 00 00

97 00

07 00

21 00

12 00

25 00

57 00

84 00

00 48

30 00 35

28 00

00 03

गट नंवर 124 में रास्ता

125

126

11 ) सन्कर्शनापुरम

00 43

90 00 01

97 00

72 00

10 00 21

98 00 10

54 3862

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

11 ) सन्कर्शन। पुत्र (निरंतर)

जिला कृष्णा मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: गुडलकल्लोरू

102

1 ) विन्नाकोट

103

104

105

106

108

109

117

118

120

121

127

128

133

473

481

483

484

गट नंबर 484 में नदी

485

486

497

498

499

500

501

2) चन्द्राला

गट नंवर 71 में नाला

गट नंबर 72 में नाला

[Part II Sec. 3 (ii) ] 3

92 00 38

77 00

04 00

00 06

26 राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

19 00 21

17 00

08 00

32 00

52 00

83 00

34 00 24

64 00

68 00

00 28

45 00

77 00

01 00

62 00

34 00 00

10- 00

79 00 26

14 00 08

00 36

39 00 01

58 00

72 00

00 27

52 00

25 00

45 00

41 भाम खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3863

का रामपत्र बुलाई 4,200 / 13, 1931

2 2) चन्द्राला

172

174

175

180

181

185

186

187

189

190

191

657

3) अगलूरू

523

524

526

559

560

561

564

565

566

567

568

572

576

581

582

583

584

585

586

595

596

597

598

599

5 00 00

13 00

92 00

41 00

62 00 49

16 00 05 -84 00 06

29 00

26 00

75 00 43

64 00

31 2.18 00 55

21 00 20

29 00

92 00

48 00 07

84 00

00 26

13 00 $39 156 00 03

53 00 10 -02 00

280 00 22

79 00 26

51 00 08

41 00 48

30 00 00

10 00 43

62 00

04 00 $35

86 00 09 100 00 02

16 00 39

67 00

66 200 09

11 00 20

16 00 40

66 00

19 00

85 3864

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ ASADHA 13 , 1931

600

3) अन्गसूर (निरंतर)

602.

658

659

660

661

667

669

670

671

672

673

675

4) वेमुगुन्टा

[Part II Sec. 3( ii)] 3

10 00

00 05

33 00 08

56 00 40

24 00

57 00

99 00 38

51 00

30 00 43

33 00

08 00

00 00

22 00

गट नंबर 3 में नाला

10 00

गट नंबर 4 में नाला

23 00 06

74 00 40

85 00

65 00

63 00 00

16 00 01

25 00

गट नंबर 27 में नाला

5 ) पेन्जेंद्रा

39 00

84 00 08

79 00

गट नंवर 75 में नाम्ला

102

103

105

217

218

219

225

98 00 36

92 00 32

30 00

36 00 00

46 00

86 00 21

98 00

15 00

61 00

29 00 16

03 00

00 28

49 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

226

5) पेन्जेंद्रा (परंतर)

227

228

229

गट नंबर 229 में नाला

230

231

233

235

238

240

298

299

300

301

304

305

306

गट नंबर 306 में रास्ता

309

310

316

317

359

360

गट नंवर 360 में नाला

361

362

363

367

368

369

370

377

378

379

380

381

384

385

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक :पामारू

जिला कृष्णा

1) रिम्मनापुडी

3865

5 3

00 16 50

49 00

54 00 05

78 00

00 20

15 00

00 04

97 00

00 27

91 00 14

63 00

25 -89 00 18

27 00 01

15 00 14

91 00 04

63 00

46 00

00 29

74 00 19

83 00 60

68 00

90 00 02

90 00 09

39 00

94 00 47

41 00

47 00

37 00

97 00 13

37 00 17-

20 00 05

09 00 34

71 00 10

78 00 05

27 00 00

27 00 03

11 राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश

00 18

53 00 17

71 3866

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2000MABADHA13, 1931

1) रिम्मनापुर (निरंतर)

1.02

103

104

149

150

151

162

163

164

165

167

168

169

170

171

180

174

2) कोन्डीपाल

175

181

182

183

184

185

187

189

197

198

3) रापर्ला

गट नंवर 19 में रास्ता

2,3

[Part H-Sec. 3(ii) ]

5 3

58 00 39

97 00 00

30 00

67.

05 00

70 00

87 00

36 00 06

01 00

33 00

00 09

41 00

28 00

11 00

95 00

55 00

00 00

33 00

19 00

86 00 20

89 00 22

41 00

10 00

90 00

10 00

04 00 15

57 00

28 00

18 00 00

10 00 98 76

33 00

35 [ ~ (1)]

3867

भारत का राजपत्र : बुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

2 3)

00 18

3.1 00

00 3.2

गट नंबर 45 में नाला

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक अमोच्या

04 00 03

08 00

05 00

51 00

34 00 00

29 00 00

10 00

00 26

जिला: कृष्णा

510

511

512

513

514

517

520

583

534

535

539

540

544

552

568

55-4

505

556

557

561

562

563

564

565

579

2) बलीपूडी

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

67 00 49 37 00 26

73 00 33 -03 00 06

58 00 05

52 0.0

00 46

40 00

69 00 48

41 00 02

29 00 15

36 00

85 00 01

91 00

42 00

00 13

88 00 02

73 00

69 00

38 00 24

09 00

92 00

50 00

18 00 47.

84 00 0-4

मट नंबर 10 में रोड

00 0.2

94 3868

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

2) बलापूडी ( र)

[Part H-Sec. 3( 3

30 00 39

18 00

00 27

79 00

00 02

76 00

गट नंबर 91 में नदी

101

102

103

09 00

53 00

00 06

54 00 04

प्रदेश

राज्य: आन्ध्र

जिला: कृष्णा

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक:पमिडीमुक्कला

103

1 ) मामिल्लापल्ले

104

110

111

2) पेनुमत्सा

50 00 09

00 08

73 00

43 01

49 00 00

28 00 04

00 30

33 00

66 00

गट नंबर 16 में नाला

75 00

42 00

गट नंवर 17 में नाला

144

3 ) कृष्णापुरम

146

147

148

149

150

151

153

154

155

166

170

172

14 00 00

35 .. 12

00 00

13 00

58 00

00 03

80 00

00 00 08

36 00 36

36 00

53 00 08

42 00 04

86 [भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

2 3)

181

182

183

184

329

331

332

334

335

336

341

343

344

347

349

351

352

358

359

360

4) चोरागुडी

343

344

130

5 ) कुडेल

133

143

145

146

151

152

153

154

158

166

167

169

175

3069 3

00 38

37 00 09

95 00 20

53 00 00

00 49

81 00

00 11

22 00 00

98 00 12

12 00 06

13 00 47

77 00

43 00 48

99 00

10 00 43

63 00 23

46 00 36

59 00 07

10 00

71 00

70 00

58 00 07

76 00 46

49 00 41

91 00

00 45

61 00

30 00 06

65 00 04

17 00 08

77 00 25

86 00 24

55 00

21 00

14 00 02

08 00 35

44 00

44 35

00 25

83 00 17

65 00 15

05 3870

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2000/ASADIEA 13 , 1931

2 1

176

5 ) कुबेत

178

189

190

192

193

233

गट नंबर 233 में नवी

234

235

236

239

243

गट नंबर 243 में नवी

244

245

309

347

6) ईनापुरू

7) लंकापहिल

गट नंबर 4 में नही

144

154

155

156

157

84 0.0.

33.

31 00

00 13

20 00

85 00

67 00

75 00 22

59 00 04

80 00 02

23 00 19

90 00

91 00

00 28

69 00

13 00

3.1

67 00 05

00 28

9.8

99 00. 24

73 00 36

गर्ड नंबर 146

के

New Dethi , the 20th , 200-

S. O. 180 Whereas it appears to Government of India that it is necessary in public interest that for transportation of natural gas from tap off point of Kakinada - Hyderabad -Uran - Ahmedabad trunk gas pipeline at Vijayawada in Andhra Pradesh of M/sReliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited to consumers in various part of the country, a pipeline should be laid by M/ s Relogistics Infrastructure Limited;

And whereas, it appears to Government of India that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which are described in the Schodule annexed here to ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962), Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquire the Right ofUser therein;

3871 Any person interested in ad described in the said Schedule may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of Right of User therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri M.A. Gaffar. Competent Authority , Relogistics Infrastructure Limited, House No. 59-1-18/3 , Opp Roadto Maries Stella College, Bus ute No. 5, Ramachandra Nagar, Vijayawada 520 008, Krishna District. Andhra Pradesh State

Schedule

MandalyTobally Thinand

District:Krishne Village

Survey No./Sub-Division:No.

1) Kondangi

Upputeru River in Gat No. 1.

2) Amaravati

127

3) Kalidindi

128

132

133

136

137

138

154

155

1.72

173

174

645

654

655

656

657

660

661

794

796

806

807

812

813

830

854

855

856

857

858

State:Andhra Pradesh

Area tobe acquired for Rel Hec

C-Are

5 3

70 00

42 00

32.

00 00:

00:

98 00

52.

69 00

12.

00:

$00

100

42.

38.

11 3872

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

863

3) Kalidindi (Coitd)

1004

1007

1008

1009

1010

1017

1018

1019

1020

1021

1022

1023

1218

1219

1222

1223

1224

1228

1229

1230

1231

1232

1233

1249

1250

1251

1271

1272

1273

1274

1276

1277

413

4) Sanarudravaram

414

415

416

417

418

419

420

421

[Part II-Sec. 3 (i ) ] 3

47 00

14 00

76 00

14 00

12 00

64 00

33 00

20 00

33 00

53 00

45 00

80 00

89 00

75 00

06 00

55 00

11 00

87 00

08 00

71 00

22 00

25 00

95 00

32 00

24 00

59 00

85 00

18 भारत का राजकृत : जुलाई 4, 2009/ आषाढ़ 13, 1931

[भान II- राण्ड 3(ⅲ)]

2 4) Samarudravaram(Contd)

423

424

425

426

428

5) Korukollu

지

389

340

344

345

359

360

361

367

371

372

373

374

375

377

378

379

380

381

886

6) Avakuru

Dharma Cheruvu in Gat No.9

Nala in Gat No.48 .

5 00

22 00

11 00

18 00

54 00

92 00

53 00

40 00

51 00

24 00

96 6:0 01

65 00

67 00

37 00

11 00

87 00

25 16

28 00

43 00

73 00

00 36.L

16 60 07;

85 00

76 06

00 3874

[Part II Soc. 3(i )]

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AIRY 4, 201ΜΑ 13, 1931

64 6) Avaleurs (Coned )

15 7) Kotcherla

21 Mandal/Tabeil/Taddinpulli

22 1) Mulakalapalli

33,

1:09

113

114

116

119

120'

122

123

124

125

127

5 3

36 第3 00

$89

40 00

97 00

45 00 28

15 00

87 00

51 00

69 00

97 00

09 00

65 00

24 00

53 00

74 00

020

00 भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

423

2) Bomminampadu

426

432

435

443

445

452

461

468

121

3) Korraguntapalem

125

134

135

139

4) Idepalle

River in GatNo.52

River in Gat No.53

River in Gat No.62

5) Peddagonnuru

2287 GI/09-15

3875

5 3

56 00

99 00

58 11 00

07 20

41 00

92 00

27 00

49 00

57 00

07、

24 00

54 00

47 00

13 00

06 00 03

92 00

29 00

00.

09 00

49 00

09 00

22 00

10 00

98 46

89 00

77 00

63 00

19 00

00 09

44 3886

22 5) Pedigemara (Conery

344

555

942

560

5901

571

572

5933

577

5786

580%

6) Komava

167

17221. 7) Cheme

5 346

100

00%

54 100

0 255 76%

8 00 100

0 76 47 $00

30 442

100

27 00 22

38 -00

00 26:

50 00% 10% 12 30

345 188 10

S 00

108 109

07 000

30 5

235

27 TT

404 48

255

200

FES

3號 10

10 0

100

22 33 100

44 400

B 100

$60

224 7) Commuru-(Coned)

Nala in Gathio149

$89

$00

101

102

103

406

407

109

110 8) Kakaravada

Nala in Gat Dlg: 2

Nala inGet No 3

وي

220

84 9) Mudinepalli

359

260

362

363

266

Nala in Gorblo 2869

1931

144 46

729 001

555 000 04 776

227

37 100

000

00 29 100

200

226

$37

100

ایم

000

12 00 300 43 00

$5 449

594 000

700

000

300

8 100 10

000 332 13

664

002

000

880 500 001 445 00 000 112

400

100

00 37 661

00 003

000

091

6100

447

1 00 36

400 222 551 000

222 00 33 337

10:0

500 000

1995

000

320

600

882 00

8 009 000

449

222

000

1003 000 223 088

003 332 000 002 666 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

3878

2 1

372

9) Mudinepalli(Contd)

373

374

376

377

378

379

382

388

391

393

394

395

10) Penumalli

102

103

108

120

121

122

123

124

Cart Track in Gat No.124

125

126

11 ) Sankarshana Puram

[Part II-Sec.3( ii) ]

5 3

14 00

00 00

88 00

97 00

82 00

74 00

54 00

15 00

04 00

95 00

92 00

49 00

22 00

50 00

38 00

34 00

78 00

54 00

21 00

25 00

57 00

30 00

28 00

62 00

12 00

90 00

72 00

98 00

10 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3879

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़13 , 1931

2 1

11) Sankarshana Puram (Contd)

District: Krishna Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk : Gudlavalleru

102

1) Vinnakota

103

104

105

106

108

109

117

118

120

121

127

128

133

473

481

483

484

5 00

77 00

85 00

86 00

87 00

04 00

85 00

26 State: Andhra Pradesh

19 .

17 00

08 00

52 00

34 00

05 00

64 00

68 00

59 00

River in Gat No.484

485

486

497

498

499

500

501

2) Chandrala

01 00

62 00

34 00

10 00

79 00

14 00

19 00

Nala in Gat No.71

58 00

Nala in Gat No.72

72 00

52 00

25 00

45 00

02 2 2) Ghandzala (Comd)

172

174

175

路5

136

887

189

140

191

057 3) Angaluru

523

524

526

559

560

561

564

565

566

567

572

-976

186

倉2

583

*984

985

586

595

897

598

599

24 41

304

113 46

584

229

403

75 00 04

31 8

5 21

789

607

103 183 00

800

του 00

107

22 79 00

00:

41 00 08

008

300

602

4 00:

*00

4002

67 00

107

600

609

300

4 3801

1447

2010

0533

601

27.

690

672

08:

673

500

100

49 Vermegtet

2000

Nala inGat No.3

NakinGatNo.4

13:

755

224

235

T 40:

Madtuin Gate: 27

4樓萬

705

133 3

192

305

217

219

2 [Part II-Sec. 3( ii)]

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JULY 4, 2009/ ASADHA 13, 1931

3882

226 5) l'enjendra (Contd)

227

228

229

5 4

17 -49

Nala in Gat No.229

230

231

233

235

238

240

298

299

300

301

304

305

306 00

20 00

56 00

28 .00

97 00

63 00

89 00

15 00

Cart Track in Gat No.306

309

310

316

317

359

360

Nala in Gat No.360

361

362

363

367

368

369

370

377

378

379

380

381

384

385

District : Krishna Mandal/ Tehsil/ Taluk: Pamarru

82 1) Rimmanapudi

46 00

74 00

70 00

90 00

39 00

94 00

41 00

37 00

97 00

09 00

71 00

27 00

State: Andhra Pradesh 00

53 00

71 भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

84 1) Rimmanapudi ( Contd)

102

103

104

149

150

151

162

163

164

165

167

168

169

170

171

180

174 2) Kondiparru

175

181

182

183

184

185

187

189

197

198

12 3) Raparla

Cart Track in Gat No.19

29 2287 Gl/09-16

3883

5 3

58 00

97. 00

30 00

05 00

69 00

36 00

01 00

33 00

76 00 、 22

11 00

95 00

56 00

55 00

33 00

10 00

41 00

10 00

70 00

04 00

57 00

28 00

10 00

33 00

57-

00 [Part B Sec .3(i ))

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JARY 4, 200WASАБКА 13, 1931

3) Kaparta (Contd)

Nala inGat No.45

Mandai/Tabul/Taluk: Rove

510

1 ) Bhatkapenemarти

511

512

513

514

517

520

533

534

535

539

540

541

544

552

553

554

555

556

557

561

562

563

564

565

579

2) Barlapudi

Rond inGat No. 10 3

31 00

17 00

89 00

04 00

29 00

10 00

17 00

dhra Pradesh

67 00

37 00

00 26

58 00

52 00

05 00

46 40 00

69 00

48 41 00

36 00

91 00

03 00

69 00

38 00

50 00

95 00

84 4,200 / 13, 1931

2 2) Harlapudi ( Contd)

River in Gat No.91

101

102

103

Mandal/ Tehsil/Taluk: Pamidimukkala

District:Krishna

103

1) Mamillapalle

104

110

111

2) Penumutsa

Nala in Gat No.16

Nala in Gat No.17.

144

3) Krishnapuram

146

147

148

149

150

151

153

154

155

166

170

172

17 00

30 00

79 00

81 00

15 00

23 00

$2 00

43 00

86 00

28 00

$2 00

75 00

03 00

41 00

35 00

00 00

13 00

70 00

36 00

53 08

42 00

04 26 3886

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

2 1

181

3) Krishnapuram ( Contd)

182

183

184

329

331

332

334

335

336

341

343

344

347

349

351

352

358

359

360

4) Choragudi

343

344

130

5) Kuderu

133

143

145

146

151

152

153

154

158

166

167

169

175

176

178

189

190

192

193

233

River in Gat No. 233

234

[Part II Sec . 3 ( ii)] 4

5 3

53 20

12 00

81 00

94 00

22 00

98 00

12 00

13 47

77 00

10 00

63 00

46 23

59 00

71 00

70 00

76 00

49 46

91 00

17 00

77 00

55 00

21 00

44 00

65 00

05 00

84 00

57 00

00 3887 भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/ आषाढ़ 13, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड3( ii) ]

235

5) Kuderu (Contd)

236

239

243

River in Gat No.243

244

245

309

347

-00

6) Inapuru

31 7) Lankapalli

River in Gat No.4

144

154

155

156

157

In bet Gat no . 145 & VB

[F. No. L- 14014/19/2009-G.P.

K.K.SHARMA , Under Secy.

नईदिल्ली, 29 जून , 2009

का. आ. 1855.- भारत सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि मैसर्स रिलाएन्स इंडस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के आन्ध्रप्रदेश में पूर्वीतट पर ऑनशोर टरमिनल से देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए, मेसर्स रिलोजिसटिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा काकीनाडा- बासुदेवपुर -हावड़ा पाइपलाइन बिहाई जानी चाहिए;

अतः अब, भारत सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई अधिसूचना की प्रतियों साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के लिए उपायोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के संबंध में श्री के गंगाचलम सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मैसर्स रिलोजिसटिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड, नं. 67-11-21/2, साविसुजा, न्यु सेंचुरी पब्लिक स्कूल के सामने , एल बी नगर, काकिनाडा- 533003 , पूर्वी गोदावरी जिला, आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 3888

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : RAY 4, 200ABADIA 13, 1931

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक:तोंडानगी

[Part I-Sec. 3 (1)] राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला:पुर्वी गोदावरी

गाँव का नाम

269 1) राविकगपाशु

270

273/3

273/4

271

272

249

246/8

226

228

227/3

227/4

227/2

230

148

147

149/1

146

145

144/3

144/4

143

123

122

118

117/11

117/10

116

113/8

113/3

113/6

113/5

113/7

114/7

111/2

34/1

करने

एकर

00 59

00 02

00 01

00 39

00 41

00 70

00 28

00 08

00 22

00 00

00 07

00 05

00 23

00 02

00 01

00 15

00 05

00 00

76 भारत का समपत्र: जुलाई , 2009/ 13, 1931

2 1

34/2

1) रामिलनाडु (निरंतर)

34/3

34/4

33/1

329/1

2) पी.ई. चिन्नम्यपालेन

329/2

328

269/1

271

301/4

300/1

300/2

302/2

297/3

298/4

298/1

293

294/4

294/5

292/1

292/2

292/3

291/7

291/2

291/3

289/1

289/2

289/3

288/2

286

285

277

275

276

115

116

117

118

119/2

119/3

119/4

119/5

5 00 14

48 00 31

40 00 00

00 01

58 00

00 05

21 00

00 11

10 00 11

47 00

03 00

17 00 04

00 01

71 00 07

73 00 06

20 00 04

11 00

90 00 07

90 00

00 14

61 00 07

17 00

39 00 63

68 00 01

08 00 04

23 00 08 99 00

71 00 41

00 07

69 00 32

42 00 03

27 00

00 00

50 00

97 00 05

08 3890

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

2 1

120/3 2) पी.ई. चिन्नय्यपालेम (निरंतर)

120/4

124

125

128

127

126

133

136

137

140

139

142/2

142/3

144

146

198

147

190

189

188

151

187

162/2

184

183

185/1

185/2

185/3

185/4

185/6

180/2

179

178/2

178/1

391

392

393

394

3 ) बेन्डपूडी

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii) ] 4

40 07

57 33

54 19

77 00 02

65 00 01

16 00 03

07 00 09

38 00

76 41

00 01

13 35

56 00 05

95 18

45 00 01

76 28

90 00 02

53 00

72 00

16 00

53 00

80 32

72 00

06 00

02 00

09 00

14 00 08

51 00

18 08

00 02

47 03

80 00 00

00 00 09

90 01

67 00 49

78 00 15

48 00

00 06

64 14

33 00

47 00 80

54 200

2 3)

15/1

15/2

4) ए.कोपरले

21/2

20/2

20/1

17/1

17/3

16/3

16/4

16/2

15/4

15/3

15/2

12/1

6/2

6/3

11/

11/20

11/2की

11/2सी

11/1की

11/3

7/ 1बी

7/2ची

7/1ए

10/2

62/1

69/3

69/2

47/1

47/2

72/3

2287G1/09-17

"00 21

00 24

33 00 03 46

$ 6 00

06 07

83 00 51

97 00 28

51 00 26

72 00 . 04

74 00 20

20 00 29 95 00 27

63 00

67 00 00

25. 00 22

24 00 18

70 00 26 04

40 00 01

33 0.0

31 0:0 03

13 00

00 55

71 00 02

79 00 00

17 00

10 00 29

54 00 29

54 00

44 00 00

10 06 19

00 61

00 01

30 0:0 05 63 00 .08

00 00

10 00 10

39 0:0

#2 00 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA13, 1931

3892

2 1

72/2बी 4) ए.कोत्तापल्ले (निरंतर)

114

113

110/ 2बी

108

104/1 ए

104/ 2बी

104/3ती

103/2

102/4

102/3

129

127

130

131/2

131/1

143

142

141

140

1/2

5) पैडीपाला अग्रहारग

सर्वे नं . 1 और 2 के बीज में था . और की के बीच

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक तुनी

1114/3 1) तेटगुन्य

1115

1123

1122

1124/1

1125

1067/1

1067/2

1068/2

1058

1066

1059

1060/3

1060/2

1060/1

991

988

989

990

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii)]

92 06

71 08

60 04

23 00 26

06 06

00 00

48 00

82 00

79 06

96 00 06

10 00

90 00 00

87 00

83 00

0-0

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

49 00 04

00 09 01

42 00 64

39 00 19

03 00 08

69 00 27

10 00 30

00 69 81

02 00 06

14 00 10

88 00

00 [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

3893

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

993

1) तेटगुन्टा (निरंतर)

995

1025/1

1025/2

996

1024/1

1024/2

1024/3

1024/4

1014

1017

1016

1018

912

911

910/2

910/6ए

910/5

910/ 7ए

253

2) इंसावरम

251

250

249/2

249/1

248

247/3

242

241

163/1

163/2

163/3

163/4

164

165/2

165/3

159

158

157/2

157/3

155/5

260

138/1

00 02

00 04

00 14

00-

00 49

00 23

00 01

00 30

00 10

67 60

00 00

00 58

56 00 04

00 10

27 00 45

00 18

00 02

00 16

00 17

00 00

00 97

00 05

00 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : RALLY 4, 200WASADIA 13, 1931

134/2

132

130

129

128

123/2

125/2

126/2

126/1

1.17/3

117/2

116

115

101/2

101/1बी

102/1

102/2

103

41/3

41/4

41/5

41/6

41/7

41/8

41/9

39/1

39/2

39/3

38/4

39/5

39/6

40/2

38/1

38/2

38/3

275/1 3.) बल्लूरू

275/2

275/3

5 00 34

23 00

00 65

47 00 09

00 26

55 00

00 44

10 00

84 00

00 10

93 00

20 00 57

00 26

81 00

84 00

30 00

42 00 39 57

0-0

69 00 04

09 00 05

54 00 08

01 00 07

23 00 08

54 00

71 00 20

33 00

82 00 11

07 60

00 09

91 00 16

42 00

44 00

00 01

59 00

68 00 30

63 00 19

50 60 16

37 2

274/2

274/1

276/2

276/1

273/4

277

279/2

279/1

280/7

283

282/4

282/3

282/5

282/2

281/3

281/1

284

152

153/1

153/2

153/3

156

155

157/9

157/10

157/13

157/12

157/14

141/1

141/2

141/3

140/4

140/5

140/6

140/2

140/1

139/1

139/2

181

182/1

182/2

182/3

3895 13, 1931

5 00 10

63 00 56

88 00 27

18 00

13 00 03

75 00 12

48 00

00 11

82 00

58 00 05

99 00 00

33 00 05

61 00 03

09 00 00

59 00 01

47 00

80 00

59 00 20

00 00

21 00

08 00

30 00 27

41 00

0.0 38

33 00 23

90 00 26

30 0:0 03

59 3896

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

183/9

3 ) वल्लूरू (निरंतर)

183/8

183/7

110/3

110/1

110/2

109/1

109/2

109/4

109/3

107

93/1

105/4

105/2

105/3

94/3

94/1

94/2

57/1

56/1

56/2

56/3

56/8

56/9

56/10

49/6

49/5

49/4

49/1

49/2

49/3

47/4

47/5

47/2

47/7

4) कवलापाडु

94/3

95/1

95/2

[Part II Sec. 3( ii) ] 3

00 14

00 06

00 18

00 20

00 09

00 29

00 01

00 03

00 24

00 05

00 00

00 68

00 15

00 00

0.0 05

00 06

00 02

00 06

00 01

00 19

89 3897 [ भाग II- खण्ड3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आवाड़ 13, 1931

(निरंतर)

85/1

85/11

85/7

85/10

00 00

84/7

84/6

84/5

84/4

00 00

82/2

.00

00.

81/1

81/5

81/2

00 08

81/3

81/4

[फा. सं. एल-14014/17/2009-जी.पी.

के.के. शर्मा, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 29thJune, 2009

S. O. 1855. Whereas it appears toGovernment of India that it is necessary inpublic interest that for the transportation of natural gas from onshore terminal at East coast of Andhra Pradesh of M/s . Reliance Industries Limited, to consumers in various parts of the country,Kakinada-Basudebpur -Howrah a pipeline should be laid by M/ s . Relogistics Infrastructure Limited;

And whereas , it appears to Government of India that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in land under which the said pipeline isproposed tobe laid and which are described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquire the Right ofUser therein;

Anyperson interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of Right of User therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri K. Gangachalam, Competent Authority, Relogistics Infrastructure Limited, D.No. 67-11-21 /2 Savisuja, Opp New Centuary Public School , L.B. Nagar , Kakinada - 533003 , East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh State.

3898

THE GAZETTE OF NEMA: ALY 4, 13, 1931

Schedule

District: finst Godawa

Mandal/Tehsil/Taluk: Thendengi

Village

269 1). Ravikampadu

270

273/3

273/4

271

272

249

246/8

226

228

227/3

227/4

227/2

230

148

147

149/1

146

145

144/3

144/4

143

123

122

118

117/11

117/10

116

113/8

113/3

113/6

113/5

113/7

114/7

111/2

34/1

Aree to be acquired for Roti

Are

C-Are 3

5 00

93 00

34 00

22 00

80 00

45 00

71 00

22 23 00

99 00

52 00

73 00

14 00

67 00

13 00

010

09 00

34 00 06

15 92

8.5 05

76 भारत का राजपत्र जुलाई 4, 2009/ आषाढ़ 13, 1931

2 1

34/2 1 ) Ravikampadu (Comd)

34/3

34/4

33/1

329/1 2 ) PE.Chinmayapalem

329/2

328

269/1

271

301/4

300/1

300/2

302/2

297/3

298/4

298/1

293

294/4

294/5

292/1

292/2

292/3

291/7

291/2

291/3

289/1

289/2

289/3

288/2

286

285

277

275

276

115

116

117

118

119/2

119/3

119/4

119/5 2287GM

5 00 14 31

26 00 46

40 00 00

00 01

25 00

10 00 11

47 00

22 00

71 00

73 00 07

06 20 00

11 00

90 00

14 66 00

60 00

61 00

39 00

68 00

23 00

99 00 06

85 00

71 00

69 00

73 00

27 00

00 05 3900

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

120/3 2) P.E.Chinnayapalem ( Contd)

120/4

124

125

128

127

126

133

136

137

140

139

142/2

142/3

144

146

198

147

190

189

188

151

187

162/2

184

183

185/1

185/2

185/3

185/4

185/6

180/2

179

178/2

178/1

391

392

393

394

3) Bendapudi

[Part II Sec. 3 ( ii)] 3

00 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

3) Bendapudi ( Contd)

15/1

15/2

4 ) A.Kothapalle

21/2

20/2

20/1

17/1

17/3

16/3

16/4

16/2

15/4

15/3

15/2

12/1A

6/2

6/1B

6/3

6/4B

11/4A

11/2/A

11/2B-

11/2C

11/1B

11/3

7/1B

7/2B

7/1A

10/2

62/1

69/3

69/2

47/1

47/2

72/3

3901. 3

03.

00 00

19 61

00 01

00 00

82 3902

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JLY 4,200 /ASADRA 13, 1931

72/28 4) A.Kothapalle(Coutd)

114

113

110/2B

108

104/ 1A

104/2B

104/3C

103/2

102/4

102/3

129

127

130

131/2

131/1

143

142

141

140

1/2

5) PaidipalaAgrabaram

InBet. Svy no. 182 and in Dotary. No.2 & V.B 00

Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk:Tuni

1114/3 1) Tetagunta

1115

1123

1122

1124/1

1125

1067/1

1067/2

1060/2

1058

1066

1059

1060/3

1060/2

1060/1

991

908

990

Phut Se

00 06 06

3 00

00 01

06 79

00 09 66

20 37

21.

00 2 1)

995

1025/1

1025/2

996

1024/1

1024/2

1024/3

1024/4

1014

1017

1016

1018

912

911

910/2

910/64

910/5

910/7A

253 2) Hamsavaram

251

250

249/2

249/1

248

247/3

242

241

163/1

163/2

163/3

163/4

164

165/2

165/3

159

158

157/2

157/3

155/5

260

138/1

3903 1937

5 3

33 00

00 73

77 00

04 31 00 00 46

38 00

99 00

00 19 00

00 49 00 49 50

04 00

93 00 07 99

ΟΙ

49 00

10 08 00

67 00

10 00

04 00

96 00

56 00

27 00

18 60

76 00

32 00

49 00

94 00 00

03 35 00

63 00

42 00

44 3904

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

138/2 2) Hamsavaram ( Contd)

132

130

129

128

123/2

125/2

126/2

126/1

117/3

117/2

116

115

101/2

101/ 1B

102/1

102/2

103

41/3

41/4

41/5

41/6

41/7

41/8

41/9

39/1

39/2

39/3

39/4

39/5

39/6

40/2

38/1

38/2

38/3

275/1 3) Valluru

275/2

275/3

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii) ] 3

16 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

2 1

274/2 3) Valluru ( Contd)

274/1

276/2

276/1

273/4

277

279/2

279/1

280/7

283

282/4

282/3

282/5

282/2

281/3

281/1

284

152

153/1

153/2

153/3

156

155

157/9

157/10

157/13

157/12

157/14

141/1

141/2

141/3

140/4

140/5

140/6

140/2

140/1

139/1

139/2

181

182/1

182/2

182/3

18379

183/8

183/7

110/3

110/1

110/2

109/1

109/2

109/4

3905

5 3

82 00

55 00

18 00

13 00

75 00

48 00

20 00

15 00

59 00

43 00

47 00

59 00

00 00

96 00

08 00

10 00

30 00

41 00

90 00

39 00

59 00 03

00 16 27 00

51 00

81 00 29

61 00 01

70 00 15

06 3906

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : ALY40АВНА 13, 1931

1073 3) Vallura (Comed)

107

93/1

105/4

105/2

105/3

94/3

94/1

94/2

57/1

56/1

56/2

56/3

56/8

56/9

56/10

49/6

49/5

49/4

49/1

49/2

49/3

47/4

47/5

47/2

477

24 4) Kavalapadu

94/3

95/1

95/2

85/1

85/11

85/7

85/10

84/7

84/6

84/5

84/4

82/2

$1/1

81/5

81/2

81/3

81/4

15 10

24 66

10 00

97 00

10 00

00 89

07 00

95 00 06

45 13

55 00

45 00

91 00

30 90

00 51

71 00

44 00 08

01 86 F. No. L-14014/17/2000-G.P .

K.K.SHARMA, UnderSecy.

3897

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड3 (ii) ]

(निरंतर)

00 02

85/1

85/11

85/7

85/10

00 15

84/7

84/6

84/5

00 00

84/4

.00

82/2

81/1

81/5

81/2

00 08

81/3

00 01

81/4

[फा. सं. एल-14014/17/2009-जी.पी.

के.के. शर्मा, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 29thJune, 2009

S. O. 1855. Whereas it appears to Government of India that it is necessary inpublic interest that for the transportation of natural gas from onshore terminal at East coast of Andhra Pradesh of M/s . Reliance Industries Limited, to consumers in various parts of the country,Kakinada-Basudebpur-Howrah a pipeline should be laid by M/s . Relogistics Infrastructure Limited;

And whereas, it appearsto Government of India that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which are described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquire the Right ofUser therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of Right of User therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri K. Gangachalam, Competent Authority, Relogistics Infrastructure Limited , D.No. 67-11-21/2 Savisuja, Opp New Centuary Public School , L.B. Nagar , Kakinada - 533003 , East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh State .

3898

THE GAZEITE ALY 4, 2013, 2931

Schedule

Mandal/Tehall /Taluk :Thendangi

Village

Survey te /Bu

Districtbllest

269 1). Ravikampadu

270

273/3

273/4

271

272

249

246/8

226

227/3

227/4

227/2

230

148

147

149/1

146

145

144/3

144/4

143

123

122

118

117/11

117/10

116

113/8

113/3

113/6

113/5

113/7

114/7 :

111/2

34/1

Ave

Aren to be acquined for Roti Hac

C-Ave

35 00

93 00

34 00

22 00

86 00

97 00

98 00

45 00

99 00

52 00

26 00

14 09

87 00 03

67 00

76 00 भारस राजपत्र बुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

34/2 1 ) Ravilkumpadu (Comd)

34/3

34/4

33/1

329/1 2 ) P.E.Chimayapalem

329/2

328

269/1

271

301/4

300/1

300/2

302/2

297/3

298/4

298/1

293

294/4

294/5

292/1

292/2

292/3

291/7.

291/2

291/3

289/1

289/2

289/3

288/2

286

285

277

275

276

115

116

117

118

119/2

119/3

119/4

119/5 2267 0

5 00

14 31 00

48 00

82 00 03

40 00

58 00

25 00

21 00

10 00

47 00

97 00

22 00

03 00

17 00

00 07

73 00

06 : 20 00 04 11 00

07 90 00 07

90 00 20 04 00

07 00

05 60 00

17 00

39 00

68 00

08 00

99 00

71 00

00 32 73 00 03 42

27 00

00 00

08 00

05 3900

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

2 1

120/3 2) P.E.Chinnayapalem (Contd)

120/4

124

125

128

127

126

133

136

137

140

139

142/2

142/3

144

146

198

147

190

189

188

151

187

162/2

184

183

185/1

185/2

185/3

185/4

185/6

180/2

179

178/2

178/1

391

392

393

394

3) Bendapudi

[Part II Sec. 3 (ii) ]

09.

56 00

95 00

18 45

76 00

00 28

53 00

16 00

76 00

80 00

06 00

14 00

51 00 08

18 00 08

47 00

80 00

81 00

90 00

67 00

64 00

54 00 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

3901.

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

2 1

3) Bendapudi (Contd)

15/1

15/2

4 ) A.Kothapalle

21/2

20/2

20/1

17/1

17/3

16/3

16/4

16/2

15/4

15/3

15/2

12/1A

6/2

6/1B

6/3

6/4B

11/4A

11/2/A

11/2B-

11/2C

11/1B

11/3

7/1B

7/2B

7/ 1A

10/2

62/1

69/3

69/2

47/1

47/2

72/3

03 46

00 18

08 11

82 3902

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JALY 4, 200WABADIA 13 , 1931

72/2B 4) A.Kothapalle( Contd)

114

113

110/28

108

104/ 1A

104/2B

104/3C

103/2

102/4

102/3

129

127

130

131/2

131/1

143

142

141

140

1/2 5) Paidipała Agrakaram

5 3

06 00

00 00 03

82 00 46

% 00

10 00 00

14 00 04

09 66

90 00

38 02

83 00

72 00

19 40 00

laBet. Svy no. 182 and In Batory. No.2& V.B

Mondal /Tehoil/Taluk :Tani

1114/3 1) Tetagunta

1115

1123

1122

1124/1

1125

1067/1

1067/2

1068/2

1058

1066

1059

1060/3

1000/2

1060/1

991

905

989

990 00 86

01 00

00 06 03

69 60

81 00

14 00 25

88 00

21.

62 I

2 1) Teingunta (Cound)

566

995

1025/1

1025/2

99%

1024/1

1024/2

1024/3

1024/4

1014

1017

1016

1018

912

911

9102

910/64

910/5

910/7A

253

2) Hamsavaram

251

250

249/2

249/1

248

247/3

242

241

163/1

163/2

163/3

163/4

164

165/2

165/3

159

158

157/2

157/3

155/5

260

138/1

1937

3903 3

5 00

00 73

13 00

00 04 31 00

00 46 00 01 38 00

99 00

00 19 00

49 00

50 00

04 00

99 00

12 00

ΟΙ

54 00

49 00

08 00

85 00

60 67 00 00

10 00

04 00

96 00 04

34 00

60 00

12 00

44 00

16 32 00

49 00

00 00

94 00

35 00 97

48 00

42 00 05

63 06

59 3904

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4 , 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

138/2 2) Hamsavaram (Contd)

132

130

129

128

123/2

125/2

126/2

126/1

117/3

117/2

116

115

101/2

101/ 1B

102/1

102/2

103

41/3

41/4

41/5

41/6

41/7

41/8

41/9

39/1

39/2

39/3

39/4

39/5

39/6

40/2

38/1

38/2

38/3

275/1 3) Valluru

275/2

275/3

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii) ] 3

37 THE GAZETTE OF ININA : ALY4,30ASADHA 13, 1931

3) Val

107

93/1

105/4

105/2

105/3

94/3

94/1

94/2

57/1

56/1

56/2

56/3

56/8

56/9

56/10

496

49/5

49/4

19/1

49/2

493

47/4

47/5

47/2

47/7

24 4) Kavalapadu

94/3

95/1

95/2

85/1

25/11

85/7

$5/10

84/7

84/6

84/5

84/4

$2/2

81/1

$1/5

81/2

81/3

81/4 00

10 00

24 96

26 00

97 00

64 00

89 00

05 07

06 10 00

55 00

33:

00 06

29 00

95 00 06

56 00

62 00

55 00

45 00

19 89

02 18

91 00

05 00

31 00 00

90 05 71

08 44 00

01 26 IF. No. L-14014/17/2008-G.P .

K.K.SHARMA, UnderSecy.

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4 2009/ आपाड़ 13, 1931

274/2 3) Valluru ( Contd)

274/1

276/2

276/1

273/4

277

279/2

279/1

280/7

283

282/4

282/3

282/5

282/2

281/3

281/1

284

152

153/1

153/2

153/3

156

155

157/9

157/10

157/13

157/12

157/14

141/1

141/2

141/3

140/4

140/5

140/6

140/2

140/1

139/1

139/2

181

182/1

182/2

182/3

18379

183/8

183/7

110/3

110/1

110/2

109/1

109/2

109/4

3905 3

54 3907 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपल: जुलाई 4, 2009/ आषाढ़ 13, 1931

श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नईदिल्ली, 3 जून , 2009

followingdispute between the management ofUCO Bank and their workman to Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court - II , Dhanbad for adjudication onthe followings:

"Whether Shri Ziyaur Rahman has worked from 1-1-91 to 31-1-97? If yes, whether the action ofthe management of UCO Bank Patna in terminating his services w.e.f. 1-9-97 is justified? Ifnot, what relief the workman is entitled to?

का.आ. 1856, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण पटना के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 168 से 1999 , 2(सी) से 2001 , 78 ( सी)से 2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-6-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

2.Subsequently, vide adjudication order No. L -12012/ 210/98 - IR(B - II ) dated 23-11-2000 the dispute was transferred to this Tribunal for adjudication .

[सं. एल -12012/210/98- आईआर ( बी-II ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

NewDelhi , the 3rd June,2009

S.O. 1856.-In Pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.168 of 1999,2(C) of2001 , 78 (C) of2008) of the Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Patna as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of UCO Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 3-6-2009.

[No. L- 12012/210/98- IR (B- II)]

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, SHRAM BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA

Reference Case No. 168 of 1999

No. 2(C) of2001

No. 78 (C) of2008

3. Both the parties filed written statement . The contention of the workman is that there was permanent vacancy of two peons in Kishanganj Branch . Sri Ziyaur Rahmanwas orally appointed by the management ofUCO Bank, Kishanganj Branch against the vacancy to discharge theduties ofa peon on and from 1-1-1991 . On appointment theworkmandischarged the duties ofapeon from 10A.M. to 6 P.M. regularly as per the instruction of the manager. The workmanwas paid [email protected] per day which was subsequently raised to Rs.30 and thereafter @Rs.42 per day. The payment were made through vouchers . In that waytheworkman worked contiunously till 31-1-1997: On 31-1-1997 he was orally asked not to attend the duties from the nextdayashis services stood terminated. The workman further contends that termination of his services was 'retrenchment' as drfined under Section 2(00) of theAct. The management neither served notice nor paid notice pay nor was given retrenchment compensation prior to termination ofhis services as required under Section 25F oftheAct . The workman made requests to the management for reinstatement but the management paid no heed to. Thereafter the workman approached the sponsoring union which raised industrial dispute which culminated in this reference . The workman claims reinstatement in service with back wages and regularisation besides other reliefs.

Between the management of UCO Bank, Zonal Office , Mauryalok Complex, Patna and their workman Shri Ziyaur Rahman , represented by UCO Bank Employees Association, Patna.

FortheManagement: Shri A.K. Sinha, Asst . ChiefOfficer (Law), UCO Bank , Patna.

Shri B. Prasad, State Secretary UCO Bank, Employee Association Patna. For the Workman:

Present : Vasudeo Ram, Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Patna.

AWARD

Patna. dated the 18th May, 2009

4. The contention of the management is that the Branch Manager of Kishanganj branch ofUCO Bank had no authority to appoint. He engaged Sh . Ziyaur Rahman toperform cetain contingent work and his engagement ab- initiowas void. The normal procedure for appointmentwas not followed. There was no vacancy of peon in the Bank when the workman was engaged . His engagement or payment of wages to him was never approved by the competent authority. The workman had no legal right to continue. Further , the contention of the management is that the Bank incurred heavy losses and under a policy decisiondiscontinued engagement of casual workers . Since Sh.Rahmanwas not appointment disengagement from duty never amounted to ' retrenchment ' . According to the management the workman is not entitled to any relief and the reference must he answered in favour of the management .

Byadjudication Order No.L - 12012/210/98 - IR (B- II) dated 26-3-1999, 30-3-1999 the Government of India , Ministry of Labour, New Delhi in exercise of the powers conferredby clause (d) of sub -section ( 1 ) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereafter called ' the Act ' for brevity) referred the

2287G1/09-19 3998

THE OMITTE OF INDIA : ARY 4,200MABANA 13 , 1931

5. Upon the plantinga olika parties, and aleadersping in view the tormor following points etiac out for decision:-

(1) Whether Sh, Ziant Rohan waρολαυτά δοχα 1+1+ 1991 10:31-1-1997?

( (ii) Whatbentha.estion of the manage200 w.of.31+ 1+ 1897njutant?

((ji ) Tostrolistonesliefs, if any the wordsman is cntitled?

PeintNo (1)

6. Both the parties have bloedvidenen in oftheir respectiva contentions . Than himself (as WW1 ) and has got certain desuments exhibited. The Managementdatin adduced docuementry ayúdance.only. The wett got exhibited Zerox copy of payment/viewshoes ( WW/ 1). It is a matter of recool that patitis f of the workmen peрлігіна Малинарни ofwork,date wise, month, mis muly paid to the workmen . Incomisiones of the management filed a petition giving details of the dogs worked by the women, month wise and wine. The management, with, bolkk.withanh.com weanced by the wordman muka him by the impormentes by the management has bem mubukambibita the workman (FaxtW/2) : Tomto copy of payment vouchersatud244-97 (Sat ) gyf letter dated 16-12-1997cebank of ini 1) cleowing that the entlier unconfo 100 continue, photocopy okeinanden afahamu (Ext 1/2) comorning policy and pen for recruitment, in the post of Subeeslinnte(to for recruitment in the post of ankenliant Calec ofonder passed in WP.Now , 1000 by Honible Calearsta figh (Comtill00Bank Foderation caso (Extalyt/3 ), photorepp off Ginestilen of CO Bank datod 28-4-1997 concerning peshibition (af engagement of casual wotteers in the branshes int. ) and phatocopy of Rank's Giomiar dinted 29-3-97 comithe same subject (Ext: MAS).

7. The management has not disputed that the wodanan worked from 1-1-1991to31-1-1997 as mentional in the W.S. of the workman. Thorenslunan in theway first line ofhis examination - in - cherfikas supported the same . I have gone through his seesanamination cartfully and did not find that the same statement ofWW.1made bufere the Tribunal has been ahnilar and by the monament . It has already bean montioned shose that the management has not examined any witness on its own bahalf to

[PART I- Sec.3 (ii)]

n. Thodomils adman has not fully been produced. luded the details (except BoxtW/2) and wasahown byrtho management . I here that ExtiW12 is a letter of the ingilianec of the order of ments conHad for by the cucina dates and that the woodman was erwise, it will ho cumined later.on toonthment or simple in view the discussions made abletosshow that 1-1450000 1-1-1997udenthe Dak This point My.

8. At the very two tho mention that

went for thire or reward , the carpress or pailing under ind dispute includes who has been dismissed , inwith,conas a " mune any parson (Giniluiting an appentine saplagath in any industry to do any pute, or whose dismissal, human thue bath to that dispute , whoismiljesttonthe Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of (1000), or the thy Aut, 1900 (146 of 1950 ) , or the (ii) who iscompilegal in the police service or as an

ity; or ly in a managerial oт powers vouted in the Him-ampervisory-opacity, six hundred wither by the nature wifiseer by somson of Sunctions mainly of a

ition it can not be disputed that Kipour Bakuman was a woman . It is a fact that no ade for his appointment runs followedbut it romains afact that he was ocally engaged to work by the branch and the work une paid wanges for the service add to the management. This simply shows fast workedwithin the mendile ofthe catireBank का 14) 17 अभिकरण पटना के पंचाट ( सर्थ संख्या 76( सी ) का 2008) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो कोद्रीय सरकार को 3-6-2009 परे प्राथा no knowledge of his engagements Nothing has been adduced by the management to show that the Branch Managerwas punished or any action against him was taloon by the management for taking work from and making: payment ofwages to Sh: Ziyaur Rahman, That simply means that the work from the workman was taken under: implied consent of the management: It is a fact that the management from time to time issued letiers directing t Branch Manager/Officers to refrain from making unauthorised engagement of casual workers.

[से ए००-12012/37/2000- আমাগোরা

NewDellt, the SidHuy2009

9. Ihave alreadydiscussed above that the workasa worked under the management from 1-1-1991 to31-1-1997. The management knowingly and deliberately withheld the details ofhiswork. Even from the letter of the managersne (Ext.W/2) it is clear that the workman put in 253 days work (morethan240days) in the year 1996 i.c. during 12 calendar months preceding his removal/disengagement from the work. Under the circumstances I find that the workmanput in continuous service as defined under Section 25B ofthe Act. His removal from the service was nothing but 'retrenchment' as defined under Section 2 (00) ofthe act

Governamese Bareby pablikan (10 / Nov 7600) of2000) of the Cemal Kot cuns-Labour Cou , Pbwww in the Industrial Dispoο βόσκουν πλάνες Ory3-6-2009

[N (11-12012/27/2000 (( )) )

Regional Office; Darbhangarend their workowy Blind Kumar Pladki

For the Management Noume

For the

Wockumentary Section 25F of the Act deals with the condition : precedent to retrenchment of workman. According to the said Section no employee who has put in continuous service for not less than one year can be retrenched unless he has been given one month's notice in writing or has been paid in lieu of such notice and has been paid retrenchsent compensation. Any retrenchment in violition ofSection 25Fof the Act is illegal and unjustifiod. Undier the circumstances I find and hold that the termination of service ofthe workman is unjustified. It has been held in AIRSupremeCourt 2799 that workaman worked for 240 days continuously therefore though there was no letter of appointment, termination ofhis services wouldbe conrry to provisions of the Act . This point is decided accordingly.

Point No. ( t

AWW

10. Keeping in view the discussions made above that the services of the workman was terminated illegally I find that the workman deserves to be reinstated with back wages . This point is answered accordingly.

11. Under the circumstances I find and hold that the workman worked from 1-1-1991 to31-1-1997 under the management and the action of the management of UCO Bank in terminating his services is unjustified I f find that workman Shi Ziyaur Rahman deserves to bo reinstatedwith back wages calculated at the rate last paid Themanagement is directed to comply the same within 60 days from the date of publication ofthe Award,

Righiant Offie, Darthlings and that worthian Bliver following :

`nd this is mayAward

SUDEO RAM, PresidingOfficer

"Window ofthe management of Punjab Nástenné Binay Rigtouni Office, Darbhanga in 3910

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

provisions of the Act. Under the circumstances I find that this action of the management is wholly illegal and unjustified. This point is decided accordingly.

PointNe.(ii):

terminating the service of Sri Bindo Kumar Pandit without complying section 25F of I.D. Act and not regularising in subordinate cadre ofgroup- IV post is legal and justified? What relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

5. There are catena of decisions including that of the Hon'ble Supreme Court that regularization is an act of Executive and it is none of the business of the tribunal to pass order on regularization. Under the circumstances I hold that it isbeyond the jurisdiction of this tribunal to pass any order on the point ofregularization. This point is answered accordingly.

PointNo. ( ):

6.Theworkanan worked continuously for nearly eight years . The management retrenched him illegally. Under the circumstances I find that the workman deserves to be reinstated as class- IV subordinate staff under the management with full back wages . This point is decided accordingly.

2.Noticeswere issued to the parties on receipt ofthe ference. The workman appeared but the management did not appear to contest . Hence the case has been heard ex-parte . The workman submitted statement of claim mentioning therein that he was orally appointed by the management of Punjab National Bank to discharge the duties of a peon at Bazar Branch D.N. Singh Road, Bhagalpur w.e.f 1-1-1999. He used to work from 10 A.M. to 6P.M. regularily. He was initially paid his wages @ Rs . 625 permonth which was subsequently raised to Rs . 1600 per month. The wages was paid through vouchers ofdifferent heads . He worked till 30-4-2007 and from 2-5-2007 his services were terminated. He was neither given any notice, nor was paid notice pay or compensation. According to the workman his termination of service is illegal and unjustified and he deserves to be regularized in service in subordinate cadre of group IVpost.

3. The following points arise out for decision:-

7. In the result I find and hold that the action of the management ofPunjab National Bank, Regional Office, in terminating the services of Shri Binod Kumar Pandit without complying Section 25F of I.D. Act is illegal and unjustified and the said workman deserves to be reinstated on the post of Subordinate IV grade Peon with full back wages. The management is directed to comply the same within 60 days from the date ofpublication of the Award.

8.And that is may Award.

(i) Whether the action of the management ofPunjab National Bank, Regional Office, Darbhanga in terminating the service of Shri Binod Kumar Pandit without complying Section 25F of I.D. Act is legal andjustified?.

VASUDEO RAM, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 3 जून , 2009

(ii) Whether the action of the management of Punjab National Bank, in not regularizing ShriBinod Kumar Pandit in service is legal &justified?

(iii) Towhat relief or reliefs the workman is entitled?

FINDINGS

PointNo. ( i)

कार.अ. 1856, औधोगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औधोगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अभिकरण जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 20/02 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-6-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-12012/178/2001-आईआर( बी- II ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 3rd June,2009

S.O. 1858.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 20/02) of the CentralGovernment Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Central Bank of India and their workomen, which was receivedby the Central Government on 3-6-2009 .

[No. L-12012/ 178/2001 - IR (P RAJINDER KUMA

4. The workman has examined himself as W.W.1 and has filed photo copies of 198 Dabit Vouchers (Exts . Wto W/197) and ten copies ofDak Delivery Register (Exts. W/ 198 to W/207) in support ofhis contention. The workman (W.W.1) in his statement made before this tribunal has fully supproted his case . His statement taken together with the documents filed by him (Exts . W series) fully support that the workman put in continuous service to the management as poen though he was orally appointed. He put in more than 240 days service in the calendar years preceeding his retrenchment . Section 25F deals with condition precedent to retrenchment . The management neither gave one month notice nor paid notice pay or compensation before retrenchment of the workman. Ithas beenheld in the decision reported in AIR 2005- Supreme Court2799 that the workman worked240 days continuously therefore through there was no letter of appointment, termination of his service would be contrary to the [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3911

भारत का राजपन्न: जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13, 1931

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/20/02

Presiding Officer: Shri Mohd. Shakir Hasan

Shri Rakesh Kumar Gurjar,

NearVasant Talkies ,

WardNo.6,

.Workman/Union Hoshangabad (MP).

Versus

The Regional Manager ,

CentralBank of India,

Regional Office,

Hoshangabad (MP) .

.Management

AWARD

Passed on this 26th day of May, 2009 1.TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L- 12012/ 178/2001 - IR (B- II) dated 16-1-2002has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :---

"Whether the action of the management ofRegional Manager, Central Bank of India, Hoshangabad in terminating the services of Shri Rakesh Kumar Gurjar w.e.f. 9-2-2001 is justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled for? "

2. The case of the applicant in short is that he was appointed on the post of Sweeper/Farras from Jan- 1995 by Regional Manager , Regional Office, Central Bank of India, Hoshangabad on a fixed pay of Rs . 175 per month. The pay was subsequently enhanced time to time . In the month of Jan -2000, his pay was enhanced to Rs . 740 per month . It is stated that in Feb-2001 , when the applicant demanded pay @ Rs . 740, the then Regional Manager threatened and orally told him not to work . It is stated that on 9th Feb-2001 , the Regional Manager paid Rs.565.70 though he worked till 31-3-2001 . It is stated that the applicant had worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year and had never censored by the department . It is also alleged that similarly other additional workers such as Bharat Bhushan Tiwari , Jitender Kumar were made permanent on the post. It is stated that applicant claims thatthe management be directed to regularise him and to pay back wages with cost of the suit.

3.The non-applicant/management also appeared and contested the case by filing written statement. The case of the management in short is that the applicant was never appointed as permanent employee . There was no post of Safai karamchari/Toilet cleaner /Farras in the bank and the appointment cannot be done without going through the norms of selection . It is stated that the services ofthe applicant washired purely on dailywages basis on occasion ofexcess work and the engagement automatically came to end on completion ofthe specificjob. It is stated that remuneration vas paid onlywhen the applicant worked on temporarybasis and onhisdemanding enhanced salary@ Rs . 740 per month, the Regional Manager stopped him. It is denied that the applicant had ever work for more than 240days in a calendar year as such I.D. Act is not applicable and he is not entitled to either reinstatement or any back wages from Feb-2001 . It issubmitted that the reference be dismissed.

4.The workman filed an affidavit that the non- applicant/Management has appointed him on the post of Safai Karamchari and has posted him at Samjipura Branch, HoshangabadArea. He has also stated in his affidavit that the back wages has been paid by the Bank. He wants to withdraw the case and in this regard , he will not filę any case. The non-applicant does not want to adduce any evidence in viewofthe affidavit executed by the applicant as the matter is finally settled between them.

5. In the result , no dispute award is passed without any costs.

6. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment atsper rules.

MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN, PresidingOfficer नईदिल्ली, 3 जून , 2009

1 का.आ. 1859.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विधाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण , पटना के पंचाट [ संदर्भ संख्या 77 ( सी ) ऑफ 2008 ] को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को3-6-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12011 /79/2008 -आईआर ( बी- II ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi, the 3rdJune, 2009

S.O. 1859. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award [Ref. No. 77 (C) of 2008] of the Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Patna asshown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of UCO Bank and their workmen, which was receivedby the Central Government on 3-6-2009.

[No. L- 12011/79/2008-IR (B- II)] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, SHRAM BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA

Reference Case No. 77 (C) of 2008 Between the management of UCO Bank, Zonal Office, Central Jail Road, (Jawaripur) , Bhagalpur, Bihar and their workman Om Prakash Tiwary.

FortheManagement : Shri A.K. Sinha, Management Representative 3912.

[ 18 :3(日) ] THE GAZETTE OF : 420NB, 1997

For the Worleman: Shri B: Praand, State Secretary , UCOBank Employee Association, Saboo Complex, Exhibition Read Patna.

Present : Vasudeo Ram , Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Patna.

AWARD

anden ruskode pos consered is at the employee of the Bank,he was onged Gromitetimens Coolie 'for doing misollowers. TheBeach Mangeshindno authority to appoint any body on camal basis. The non- engagement/discontcontinence of a coulite doses not come oftheprovision laid down ass 25F of stint at all required. According to the management: the concerned persen (se called worlunan) is not entitled to any relief under the law.

Patna, dated the 9th May, 2009

4. Upon the plendings ofthe protion and the terms of redvence the following points arise out fur adjadlintion:

(i) isthe Reference maintainable?

(ii)Whether the action of the management of UCO Bonk in terminating the services of Om Prakash Tiwary without complying Section 25FoftheAct is legal & justified?

ByadjudicationOrder No.L -12011/79/2008- IR (B-II) dated 24-10-2008 , the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi in exercise of the powers confured by clause (d) of sub-section ( 1) and sub- section (2A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial DisputesAct, 1947(liersinumer called ' the Act ' for brevity) referred the dispute between theManagement of UCO Bank, Zonal Office, Central Jail Road (Jawaripur) , Bhagalpur and their workman Om Prakash Tiwary to this tribunal for adjudication on the following:

(ii) Whether the action of the management in not reinstating Shri Tiwary in service is legal & justified?

(iv) Whether the action of the angement in not regulariving. Shri Tiwary in service is legal & justified?

(v) To what relief or reliefs the alleged workman is entitled to?.

"Whether the action of the management of Zonal Office, Bhagalpur in terminating the services of Shri Om Prakash Tiwary, temporary Poom without assigning any reason and without giving retrenchment benefit as per Section 25F of I.D. Act is legal andjustified? Whether the workman is entitled for regularization? What relief the concerned workman is entitled to? ""

Point No(3)

5.Both the parties have adduced: oral as well as documentary evidence in support of their respective contentions. The worsenexamined three witnesses inoldning himself as W. W.1 besides Krishndoe Pandey (W.W.2) and Ashok Kumar Tiwary (WW.3 ) . One Tapan Kumar Dum ArtCheiffUGOBando ( &W.1) has been eind on behalf of the mungunt. The wordsus inegut onkivited as phntonopy ofpayment list of the worlunum (Ext /W and the mangeunt has got exhibited the pluty of dotterdated29-3-97 issuedby Zonal Manager: ofUCO Bando (Ext.14) on the subject of wincondailywages .

2. The parties appeared on notice and filed their respective written statements . The contention of the workman is that he was orally appointed by the management of UCO Bank to discharge the duties of a Peon in Dholbajja Bazar Branch of the Bank w.e.f. 29-5-1995 . After appointment the workman used to discharge theduties ofa Poon from 9 A.M. to 6 P.M. on the instructions of the manager for which he was initially paid @Rs..20 per day which was subsequently raised to Rs. 30 per day. The payment used to be made through debit vouchers . There was no permanent Peon posted in the Branch at that time . He worked continuously till 13-5-97. On14-5-97 the workmanwas stopped from wowsing and he was informed that his services were terminated. The workman was not given any notice, notice pay or retrenchment compensation. The workman raised industrial disputewhich culminated in Reference Case. According to the workman the management violated the provisions under Section 25F of the Act and his termination from service and not regularizing him in service is illegal and unjustified. The workman claims that he be reinstated in the Bank as a Peon with back wages and his service as Peon be regularized.

6.Thoveis no dispute on the poi in the statements ofthem gement witness that there was a sanctioned post of Peon in Dhoisbajjs Brumah ofUCO Bank and the same was lying vacant: Thisevisabene dispute on the point that the Branch. Manager of the said bank ongaged Shiri Om Prakash Tiwary. It aus come from the roof and his witnesses that Shri Tiwary did the wordref& pronusually from 9A.M to 6 P.M. It is also not disputed thint cartier he was paid Rs. 20 par day which was subsequently raised to Rs. 30 per day. The payment used to be made through Debit Vouchers . According to the management since 3. The contention of the management is that the person concerned (the alleged workman) was never recruited by the Bank according to the recruitment rules (ii)]

3913

1913 , 1931

Shri Tiwary was not duly appointed through the process ofappointment , there was no relationship ofsoplayer and employce between the mansigement of UCO Bank and Shri Tiwary and hence the dispute raised is not en industrial dispute and hence the reference is not maintainable.

7.The definition of workman " as laid down under Section 2 (8) of the Act reads as follows:

the management. Thorous modipterone that the workman was paid by the Barkanagement for the services put in by himaspoon as disclosed-by-tho-workman andhis witnesses bofore this Tribunal . Since the workman was a daily wager he could not be made a member ofthe union of Bank employses . Bention 36 of the Act which deals with the representation of the parties reads as follows:-

36"Representationsparties ( 1 ) Aworkman who is a party to a dispute shall be entitled to be represented in any proceeding under this Act by;

(a) ( any member of the executive or other office bearer) of a registored trade ation ofwhich he is a momber;

(b) (any member of the executive or other office bearer) ofa fodontion of trade unions to which the trade anion reformato indlanse (a) is affiliated;

"Workman" means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any manual , unskilled, skilled, technical, oporational , clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward, whether the terms of omployment be express or implied, and for the purpose ofany proceeding under thisAct in relation to an industrial dispute , includes any such person who has been dismissed , discharged or retrenched in connection with, or as a consequence of, that dispute , or white illiumissal , dischage or retrenchment has ledto that dispute, but does not include any such person--

(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) , or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1990) , or the NavyAct, 1957 (62 of 1957) ; or

(c)whore the worloor is not a member of any trade union, by (anyasoner ofthe wecutive orother office benrer) ofany dwloasion.sexnocted with, or by any ather workswin omployed in, the industry in which the worker is employed and authorised in such (ii) who iscomployed in the police service or as an officer or other amployee ofa prison; or

(iii) who is employed mainly in a menial or administrative.capanity; or

hader alo winowano tien thuongh was ated by the wififico bener of the duule muon commooted with the industry in which the women wens angaged. Under the ciromstences this cannot be said notmaintainable on the groundithatcheenaithe union of mplognes .

Section 2 (k) ofthe Act definos Anilustrial Dispute' as follows:

(iv)who hoing omployed in a supervisery capacity, draws wages excsoding are thousand six hundred rupees.permomem or exercises , oither by theanture ofthe dutiesattached to the office or by womson of the powers vested in him , functions mainly or a managerial nature.

athwoon complagers and complagers , or botween lagers and win waterkonaand which is cennootod withthe cruplosment gate the towns afonyployment or ofliber, afanyрого ;

In sew aif the sonssions analle above I find and dold that the dispute hamon the management and the makeman ás mailoubtedly an industrial dispute and the seforence aude faradjudintisizmaintainable . This point is decided acondingly.

According to the definition Shri Timary is undoubtedly a workman. The details of payment made to Shri Tiwary from 29-5-1995 to 13-5-1997 soufiod by the Bank (Ext .W) shows that the workanan andaiktailly has put in continuous service in Dholbaija Bazar branch of the Bank. The management has filed the phatsonpy of letter isaned by the Zonal Maunger of UCO Bank con 29-3-1997 (Ext.M) concerning amauthorised engagement of casual workers on daily wages . This wedloman wuas engaged much prior to issuance of the said latter and was removed from service just after the said letter wear med . Under the circumstances it can not be said that this workman was engaged in violation of the directions contained in that letter .

8. The management has taken the plea that the workman was not a member of the union when all the regular employees of the Bank were the members afithe union. In this regard I find that it is not disputed that this workman was not a regular employee of the Bask; he was a daily wager who put in continuous service as desired by

9.1 have already aliscussed above that the facts of this case are not disputed sather admitted. It is an admitted fact that the sanctioned post of peon was lying vacant in the Bank. This wwwkman was engaged on daily wages to wecanikhoworked from 29-595 to 13-5-1997 continuously. Itis a fact that pocaidvertisement for the post was nude nor the pescosses of appointment wore followed and the 3914

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

without giving any retrenchment benefit as per Section 25F of the Act is illegal and unjustified. I further find that the workanman deserves to be reinstated with baok wages@ last paid. The management is directed to comply the same within two months from the date of publication of the Award.

14. And this is may Award. VASUDEO RAM, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 5 जून , 2009

का.आर. 1960.- औकोनिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इडिया के प्रपंचतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औकोनिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकारण कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 5/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो बोन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-6-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था। workman put in more than 240 days continuous service within a calendar year. The management as appears from the statement of W.W.1 removed Shri Tiwary from the work and engaged another daily rated workers Shri Prithvichand Yadav. Admittedly Shri Tiwary was not given one month notice or was paid notice pay or the compensation. His services was terminated without complying the provisions as laid down under Section 25F of the Act, or to say the removal of workman Shri Tiwary from the work was in violation of the provisions laid down under Section 25F of the Act. The work from the workman was taken and payment of wages was made to him quite within the knowledge of the management of the Bank. The management of the Bank did not take any action against the Officer who had engaged him on work and made payment. It is really surprising that the management on the one hand took work from the workman , made payment to him and on the other hand took the plea that the engagement ofworkman was illegal .

[सं. एल-12012/110/2005 - आईआर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 5th June , 2009

10.From the above discussions I find that the removal of the workman from employment was retrenchment as defined under Section 2 (00) ofthe Act. The workman has stated that he was not reinstated inspite of his repeated requests made to the authorities concerned. Under the circumstances I find that the termination ofthe services of the workman by the management without complying the provisions laid down under Section 25F ofthe Act and not reinstating him is not only illegal it is unjustified also . Point Nos . ( ii) & (iii ) are decided accordingly.

Point No. (iv) :

S.O. 1860.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 5/2006) of theCentralGovernment Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of State Bank of India and their workanen, received by the Central Government on 5-6-2009.

[No. L- 12012/ 110/2005 - IR (B- I) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI R. G. SHUKLA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT, SHRAM BHAWAN , ATI CAMPUS, GOVIND NAGAR, KANPUR

Industrial Dispute No. 5of2006 BETWEEN

11. I have already discussed that the workman was engaged without observing the procedures of appointment. There are catena of decisions and it is well settled principle of law that no direction for regularisation ofservices ofdaily wage workers can be issued. Moreover, regularisation in service is essentially the executive work, the work ofmanagement and it is none of the business of tribunal to issue directions for regularisation . Under the circumstances this tribunal can not hold as whether or not the action of the management in not regularising the services of the workman was illegal or unjustified or otherwise. This point is decided accordingly.

Point No. (v) :

Raj Kishore Srivastava,

Son ofRamKumar,

107Khiora,

Nawabganj

Kanpur

And

TheDeputyGeneral Manager ,

12. I have already discussed and held above that the termination of services of the workman by the management without complying the provision laiddown under Section 25F of the Act and not reinstating the workman is illegal and unjustified. Under the circumstances I find that the workman deserves to be reinstated with full back wages . This point is decided accordingly.

StateBank of India,

ZonalOffice,

MailRoad,

Kanpur.

13. In the result I find and hold that the action of the management of UCO Bank in terminating the services of Sri Om Prakash Tiwary without assigning any reason and 3915 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13 , 1931

AWARD

9.Accordingly the claim of the workman is rejected holding that he is not entitled for any relief as claimedbyhim.

10. Reference is decided accordingly against the workman.

1. Central Government, MOL , New Delhi , vide notification no . L - 12012/ 110/2005 - IR (B- 1 ) dated 23-1-06, has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:--

R. G SHUKLA, Presiding Officer नईदिल्ली, 8 जून , 2009

2. Whether the demand of Sri Raj Kishore Srivastava to reemploy him under Section 25H of the I.D. Act, with the management of State Bank of India Kanpur, is justified? If so, what benefits the workman isentitled?

का.आ. 1861.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय संस्कार भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में लेबर कोर्ट, पुणे के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-6-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/36/2003- आईआर(डीयू) ] सुरेन्द्रसिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 8th June ,2009 3. Case of the workman in short is that with effect from8-6-86, he was engaged by the opposite partyas peon- cum-messenger and he discharged entire function of the post ofpeon . The work and conduct of the workman ever remained outstanding . On account of unfair labour practice hewas paid his wages through voucher with a view that he may not have any proof of work. The other allegations raisedby the workman are outside the scope and ambit of thereferenceorder , therefore , the same is being ignored. It is the specfic case ofthe workman that management violated the provisions of Section 25H of the Act . On the basis of above it has been prayed that the workman be reinstated in service of the opposite party bank with full back wages, continuity of service and all consequential benefits.

S.O. 1861. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Labour Court, Pune as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 8-6-2009.

[No. L-40012/36/2003 -IR(DU)] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI V. M. KAKADE, PRESIDING OFFICER, SECOND LABOUR COURT, PUNE.

4. The claim of the workman has beendenied by the opposite party on the ground that the workman was never appointedby the bank, workman was never paid his wages asper rules of the bank, he never performed any regular and permanent nature of work, workman had never under went through regular selection process, services of the workmanwere never terminated by the opposite party, the cse ofthe workman is not covered under the provisions of I.D.Act and lastly the workman is not entitled for any relief as claimed byhim.

REF. NO.3440(LD.A. ) NO. 344 OF 2003 BETWEEN

5.After exchange of pleadings between the parties bothparties adduced oral as well as documentary evidence .

(1) GeneralManager,

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. ,

BajiraoRoad,

Pune 411002

First Party

AND

6.Having heard the arguments of the contesting parties at length and having considered the records ofthe case carefully in the light of terms ofreference , tribunal is of the view that the language used in the schedule of reference order is not indicative of the fact that the case of the workman amounts to retrenchment or not.

Smt. Indubai Sitaram Nalavade, S. No. 112/111 Alandi Road, Gunjal Vasti, Pune -411-015

SecondParty

AWARD (Date:19-12-2008)

7. It may be pointed out that present case is not a case of retrenchment under Section 2 -A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and also that demand of reemployment cannot be covered under the provisions of the Act and when it is not a case of retrenchment no benefit whatsoever canbe given to the workman.

8. For the reasons discussed above, it is held that since the instant case is not a case of retrenchment, no benefit can be awarded to the workman under the Act, by this tribunal.

This is a reference made by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour under Sec. ( 1 ) and Sec. 12(5) r/w. Sec. 2(a) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for adjudication of industrial dispute between the parties as above mentioned in the schedule .

2287 GI/09-20 3916

PART - SC.3 () ]

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4,200MASADHA 13 , 1931

Matter was kept for the evidence of the second party, but second party is remaining abeant since long. Today also second party isabeunt . It seems that second party is not interesteti to prosecate his claim. I, theeобосс , havo not alternative , but toodispose of reference for went of prosecution by seconds party. I, thorofore , precesti to pass following Orider.

Reference is hereby disposed for want of spresccation by 2nd party. No adder as to conts .

Place FRUNE

Date: 19:12:21 :

V.M. KAKADE, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 8 अजून , 2009

कामा, 1862 मोमिनार अभिनन , 1947 ( 1947 अकाः14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुप में केन्द्रीय सरकार सुर्वरिखेोष्ट ऑफ पोस्ट आफिसेस केके नियोगकों और उनके चर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निक निवाद मेंकोचीन 165/2000 ) कोअफारिसकार को8-6-20009 नकोकमरा हुमा था।

[सं. एल-40012/60/2000- ईमार(ब ) ] NewDelhi, the. Bth June ,2009

SO. 1862. In Russuance of Section 17cofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Gal Government hereby publishes the saward (Beef. No. 205/ 2000) of the Contral Government F Jabbour Court, Nagpur showing the.Минних inthe xidustrial Dispute between the comployersin relatiunto thenianegement of Superintendent of Post Offices and heir workman , which was received by the Gentatl Government on 8-6-2009.

NoiL4400 12/6072000-HR ( MU) ]

SURENDRA SINGH,Dets BERE SHRIAN.WERW

Case No.3062300)

The Supdt, ofpost office

NaudetiDivision,Pal+43 1002

Veeraus

Pathan Kabinian Walailakan

ThrwoghBecretary Disttia E.D. EmoUnion. Matangpura, humilati 143 1602 ....PartyNo.2

AWW

Dated:2755-22009

1. The Gentral Government, der antisfying the existence of dispute between The Supt. of post office Naniet! Division Naadull-131002 Party No. 1antiPathan Kabier Vilnikahan Prough Rosestary Blattia ED . Ente Union. 438002 referred the same for this Thivaletter No. (L408012/00/ 2000/IR (DU) dt . 30-5-2000 aniber dlesne ( (d) of cotion ( 1 ) anti suibastion( 24) off Restion 110 cof Digato dust , 1947 ( 10/1947) -war thabillowing "Whether the action of the management of Supdt. Post Office Division Handled in terminating the E.D. BUMP. Kapata Do (Mail ) iss legal, proper and miscontitled from thith dluse? Wilmat cather Directions are 2. It is the cause of petitioner Khaber Khan thatake was dodincat Maulid , sponsoring from Hihe rooutlerat worry grond aud garyenglienation . bell thatihis est. Hewas gilayea though slman 22140 days status of permanent yam the part of ng like rottrenchment Mycappointed tortion . Thus , it is

fileti its written statement

moritas Moniek that the tayHlowover ithasadmitted 116-11996sza Tonton Drench Post Писоаза Мощунтary and rict is conteniled that, he was the period wilm some reguliar commployee under put offthe duty. He was never engaged oyee. It has denied that his name was passered by employment change and he was given ay wittmander. Itine nisondemind the contentions ofthe Dioner regarding unblemished and agwed service . Assantling to the responthat, the galler was engage purely on temporary antispaovisionalchamisansvaret ray 39197 भारत का राजवन: जुताई 4 2009/13, 1931)

the provisions of Sec. 25FansCofDD AntisliggiTawiow ofthe principles famous caserUnder themengpantiss entitled to engage any personablyyways of sunlitstoppapp arrangement: Therefore his appointment förra period was proper and lässt suspension of the rogplir employee wasalto legal Instifee result there is no substance in the claim ofDie potitioner and deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly I dismissed it and the passed the negative award.

branebigpstinstec, Secuerdeppatenental inquiry was initiated against him: Therefore his engagement was on adhoc basis; asa-stop gap arrangement for performing the duties ofthe employee whose services were put off. However the management after the inquiry raised the suspention and tooli hinnagain on the duty. Therefore the services of the petitionerwere terminated. There was no need to follow theprovision ofthe Sections 25 (F) and 25 (G) . According to management it is legal and termination was proper: It has also contented that it is not an industry.

Nagpur

25-5-09

AAN. YADAV Prowillingficer

नई दिल्ली 8 जून 2009

4. Heard Mr. R.N.Sen Advocate of the petitioner and. Mr.R.S. Sundaram for the Respondent. Mr. Sen submitted that the petitioner has completed more than 240 days of continuous service with the respondent and his services were terminated without complying the mandatory provisions under section 25F & G of ID Act. He was not paidany retranchment compensation and therefore his terminationwas illegal .

का 143 की धारा 17 के अनुरा में कोस कर्मकारों को बीच, अनुप में विधिक कोर्ट पुणे को पंचाट ( संद केन्द्रीय सरकारको 8-6-2009 प्राप्त था।। मेरे ले

New Delhi, thie Jime; 2009)

5. As against this Mr. Sundaram submitted that it was only astop gap arrangement . He was engaged on dailywages purely on adhoc and temporary basis. As per service conditions of the department 3 years continuous service on a clear vacant post is necessary, for acquiring the permanency. The petitioner has neither completed 3 years service nor was his appointment on vacant post . Tus according to Management he is not at all entitled for the retranchment compensation or for further regularization.

S 0 1863 impune of Section 17ofitlies Indistrisk Diapster:Albtz. 1947 ( of 1977) .tile Contrah Government horobiyy priesthawed.fofiles Court, Ponvent showers intiler.Amin Disputes between thes employerssin rubhoonetosthive management of Regional Vorident PondCommi and theirworlion; width wasretirediblytheClu Governtematon: 86-20099

6. I have gone through the record it seems that the petitioner has filed lis affidavit . However he did not tom and offered for the cross- examination . Therefore he could notbe cross-examined. In such circumstances the affidavit without offering for cross examination has no meaning . It cannot be treated even as evidence. Consequently the claim ofthe petitioner remained without evidence on his behalf. The respondent was given the opportunity to adiace the evidence:Accordingly the management has examined its Divisional:Manager who has stated as per his pleading and remained unshaken during the cross examination.

Rig 3348

AND

: Sha Ts

Comm

MARANG : Mitt Gate Advocate forHinst Party

: Nit Mahadik-Advocate förr Sheonly 7. Perusal ofthe case papers indicates that though the petitioner has alleged as sponsored by employment exchange, there is nothing to prove it . Similarly no appointment order is produced by the petitionen Even as per management also no appointment order was given to the petitioner in writing. It is a fact that the petitionerwas engaged during the suspension period of the regular employee. The petitioner was engaged as a stop gap arrangement during the suspension period of one of its employee. The regalar employee was under suspension.. Therefore his post was not a vacant post . Therefore the engagement ofthe petitioner was not in avacant posts. This provisions of25F and Gare applicable only to the pers whoareentitled for the regularization. The petitioner since was not engaged on any vacant post is notat all entitledför regularization: Therefore his termination without following:

3918

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] AWARD

(Dated: 29-4-2009)

Thisreference is made by Government of India/Bharat Sarkar,Ministry ofLabour/Shram Mantralaya, Shram Shakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi- 110001 under Section 10, clause (d) of sub- section ( 1) and 2(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for adjudication of industrial dispute between above referred parties regarding the reinstatement with full back wages and continuity of service.

Second Party and Criminal Case No. 138 of 1991 was pending in the Court. On the basis of that report, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Pune had brought these factsto the knowledge of the Regional Provident FundCommissioner, Maharashtra and Goa vide letterdated 10-4-1996 alongwith the fact about unauthorised absenteeism of the Second Party for 34 days and subsequently by termination notice dated 24-10-1996, the Second Party was informed that his service shall terminated on expiry ofone month from the date ofservice ofthe notice. His services came to be terminated as he had furnished false information for getting employment and his acquittal in the criminal case would not give any right for reinstatement. On these and other grounds, it prayed for rejection ofthe reference.

4. On the basis of the pleadings , averments , allegations and rival contentions, following issues came tobe framed on 23-12-2008 at Exh. 18; the reasonings and findings thereon are as follows:

FINDINGS

ISSUES

1. Whether the Second Party was illegally terminated by the First Party?

2.Whether the Second party is entitled for reinstatement with continuity of Service and full back wages as prayed for? No

3.What Award ?

Rejected

REASONS

2. The case of the Second Party in brief is that he was appointed as " Safaiwala/Sweeper" by appointment order dated 29-9-1993 issued by the First Party. On receiving the appointment order, he joined his service as safaiwala/ sweeper as per the terms and conditions given by the appointment order and he continuously worked with the FirstParty for about three years . Suddenly, notice dated 24-10-1996 bearing No. MH/PF /R. Vig./362/DC/85 , to terminate his service, was served upon him without giving specific reason. As per the terms and conditions of the appointment order, he was to be treated as temporary for two years and after completion oftwo years , he was to be kept on probation and during the probation period, he was terminated by executing colourable exercise ofthe employer without following due procedure of law. Any show cause notice, memo was not given to him , any enquiry was not conducted and he was illegally terminated. Hence, he approached the Labour Commissioner's Office but thematter could not be settled and the referrence came to be made to this Court which was registered on 4-9-2000. Vide this statement of claim, the Second Party prayed for reinstatement with full back wages and continuity of service.

5. ISSUE NO. 1 : The Second Party-Sunil Gulab Salunkhe has examinated himself at Exh . 21 and relied upon documentary evidence . On the other hand, the First Party has also examined the solitary witness-Pratibha Vilas Godse at Exh. 27 and placed reliance on the documentary evidence.

6. The undisputed facts in this reference are that the Second Party came in service of the First Party in the year 1993 by virtue of the appointment letter dated 29-9-1993 and the declaration form was filled and submitted by the Second Party to the First Party . His name was referred through Employment Exchange and the employment was given on the basis of interview . Initially, his salarywas Rs . 3,000 per month . Further, the undisputed facts are that any enquiry was not conducted and his terminationwas done by virtue oftermination notice dated 24-10-1996.

7. It is evident from the testimony of the Second Party Sunil Gulab Salunkhe that he is educated upto 6th Std in Marathi Medium and cannot read, write, speak and understand English . The attestation form (Exh.22) was in English and his cousin in his handwriting filled that attestation form . The Second Party signed in Marathi and submitted to the First Party. The Second Party specifically deposed that his cousin did not ask him whether any criminal case was pending against him, whether he was detained in any case and whether he was convicted. On 24-10-1996, termination notice (Exh . 23) was sent to him 3. The First Party resisted the claim by filing written statement at Exh . 16. The allegations ofcolourable exercise ofthe powers ofthe employer , illegal termination , deviation from the legal procedure etc have been totally denied. It has been contended that by appointment order dated 29-9-1993, he was taken in the employment as Safaiwala on probation period of two years . His appointment was made subject to the submission of declaration form in the prescribed proforma attached to the appointment letter. The appointment was provisional subject to character and antecedent verification wherein it was also clearly mentioned in the declaration form, in the form of specific warning that if the information provided is false or any material fact is suppressed then the candidate will be unfit for employment . It is also informed to the Second Party that ifany information furnished is found to be false then his service is liable to be terminated . In his declaration form, he had filled that he was never arrested and never prosecuted for any offence but in police verfication letter dated 25-5-1999 sent by the Police Commissioner , Pune it wasdisclosed that the offence was registered against him vide Register No. 79 of 1991 U/s 337, 504 and 506(2) ofthe Indian Penal Code at Wanawadi Police Station against the 3919 भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

andvide that notice, his service was terminated. It is further evident that he was knowing that police verification for hila called for by the First Party.

against him . She also deposed that his attendance was not satisfactory. He was irregular in attendance for which Mr. T.M. Adiga , the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner , Pune had made report dated 10-4-1996 (Exh. 27) to Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Maharashtra and Goa, Mumbai .

11. In cross examination, this witness deposed that she does not know when the name of Second Party was sent for police verification and in what period, police verification has to be done . She also could not tell exact date and year whenpolice verification report was received. She specifically deposed in cross that Second Party was terminated on the basis of irregular attendance and police verification report . Sheadmittedthat in termination notice (Exh . 23 ), any ground of absenteeism and police verification report is not mentioned. She also mentioned that on termination of the employee on probation, enquiry is to be conducted.

8. In cross examination, he clearly admitted that he was terminated, as criminal case was pending against him about which he did not inform to the provident Fund Commissioner i.e. First Party. He further deposed that he had informed about the reason of termination to his Advocate before filing the statement of claim. He hadalso informed his lawyer before filing statement of claim that his application form and declaration form was filled by his cousin. He further admitted that in the statement of claim neither the reason for termination is mentioned nor it is mentioned that his cousin had actually filled the form. From this part of the testimony of the Second Party in cross examination, it becomes clear that if it was the fact his cousin has filled the declaration form and if any reason of termination was not disclosed to the Second Party by the First Party, it would have certainly incorporated in the statment ofclaim especially when, both facts were disclosed by the Second Party to the lawyer before filing statement ofclaim. It shows that both these grounds are after thought sprouted up obviously in the legal brain otherwise the same could have been mentioned in the statement ofclaim . Moreover, he himself has deposed that he was knowing that police verification was called by the First Party. It shows that the Second Party was well aware of the reason oftermination when he received notice of termination and the information given in the declaration/ attestation form was given by the Second Party himself or even if it was filled by somebody else, it was filled on the basis of the information given by the Second Party. He has also deposed in cross examination that he has never intimated to the Provident Fund Officer that the form was filled by his brother/cousin .

Though she has deposed in cross that she does not knowwhen the police verification report was called for and when the police verification report was received, it makes nodifference because the report of Police Commisioner, Pune (Exh: 17/2) dated 25-5-1995 clearly speaks that it was received on 30-5-1995 and with reference of the undated letterofthe First Party ofthe year 1994. It means in 1994 the police verification was requested for by the First Party and its report was received on 30-5-1995 . Though she has admitted that in the termination notice dated 24-10-1996 (Exh. 23) there is no mention about the ground of termintion, the Second Party has deposed in chief and admitted in cross about the reason of termination is , " giving false information and unauthorised absenteeism" . Hence , the admissions given by this witness in cross -examination and the fact that thegrounds are not mentioned in the notice of termination is ofno use of the Second Party, in the light of its own testimony and admissions given by him in cross- examination.

9. In further cross examination, the Second Party- Sunil Gulab Salunkhe denied that he was arrested by Wanwadi Police in Criminal case . However , immediately he admitted that he was released on bail in police station. He has also clearly admitted in cross examination that alongwith this sanctioned leave of 49 days , he was subsequently absent for 34 days without any information orpermission inthe year 1993. Though he has denied that he was arrested in criminal case, he has clearly deposed that he was released on bail. Needless to mention that releasing on bail is a next step of arrest and hence his denial ofarrest stand no where . Morever, it is not disputed that he was prosecuted and tried in a criminal case which canbe gatheredby his own letter dated 10-2-1997 (Exh. 25).

12. The learned Advocate Mr. Mahadik , for the Second Party, has submitted that the Second Party being educated upto 6th Std only , was not aware of English and hence what was filled in the declaration/attestation form byhis cousin was not known to him . He has also submitted that the Second Party had not given any false information and even ifcriminal case was pending against him and he had not mentioned in the declaration/ attestation form , it may amount to misconduct in which the independent departmental enquiry was to be held and then only the terminationcould have been done. Here without enquiry, terminationhas been executed which amounts to absolutely illegal termination as one of the ground is unauthorised absenteeism. With this he drew my attention to the case of Deepak Ganpat Tari v/s . New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd and others [2009 (1 ) Mh . L.J. ] Though in the application/ list of case laws, two citations have been mentioned, only one i.e. aforementioned citation's copy of Judgment have 10. It is evident from the First Party witness Pratibha Godse that she was working as Muster Clerk betweenDecember 1993 to May 1997. During the probation period ofthe Second Party, police verification was called forandthe police verification report (Exh. 17/2) ofthe Second Party was "adverse" as the criminal case was pending 3920

THE GAZETTE OF INDЛУ 4421 ANB; 1991

UnismPublicSemicutecantliovity towhom the station flasbouret tomlier an thucose may be, fill will it will bedioned to be a suppression of Pintukilim boenmade available by- hint. He hue also subind that in the criminal case, Second Pasty has been asquitted: on 30-1-1997 and hence, deserves to be reinstated with full back wages . It has been fünthue submitted by him that the FirstPartyhas not addused any documentscy evidenso to show that the poor attendance and unauthorised absence ofthe Second Party.

3. Ifthe fut tutdules informatiui buon finished or thint fretend infin inducattestathium förm commer to motiveat ny time, diuing the service ofa person, Iris services would be liable to be terminted:

For these warnings, a specific note hinasalte been pow- 12 .

15. Admittedly, on the day offilifornsowon the day of appointme ty was wellammare that he was arrested, redemed om biniland thinc criminad prossoutien we p mathima buthichaula given 12ofiattestation form 25-19 線 ( 西山 1772)

16. In the authority redied upon by learned Adveente Mis: Gupte for the FistPloty, thecondidate hod obtained appointeet by predbeing fildeconate hold by Their Lordikthat :

13. The learnedAdvocate Mr. Gupte, for the First Party,has submitted that for the employment ofthe Second Party, clean character , free froms criminal antecedent was theconditionprecedentwhich was specifically mentioned in the terms and conditions of the appointssent letter. Despite that he had deliberately supercssed the fast that hewas arrested, released on bail and criminal pressution was going on against him . He has also submitted thus if hin cousin has filled it without his instructions , he would have definitely mentioned it in the statement ofclaim of even in hisletterdated 10-2-1997 (Exh. 25) . But it has bison for the first time mentioned in the evidense without plonding. It shows that he was well aware ofhis criminal prosecution and.has deliberately suppressed the fist and given fades: information: He further submitted that ass he himself admittedhis 34 days unauthorised absume, the First Plasty was not required to file any musterroll to prove the He has also submitted that due to false information deliberate suppression of fact; the very foundation of appointment had collapsed and on that basis his service were terminated with the support of unauthorised absenteeism of 34 dyas during probation. He plased his reliance on the case ofSuperintendent ofPostOfficend others v/s . R. Valasina Babu [ 2007 ( 112) FLR914).

"Ouse the certificate on the busis of which the stood camolled, no Het of allowing him to contlincservisewould ifinchado

The raticofthecauthority issthistoriethocomployee foundationof itis fasthe proscoding

Th by leamed A isthat it wity.colindamon. ber 14. Admittedly, the evidence of the Second Pasty that his cousin has filled up the form without askin the criminal case and arrest is obviously without pi andhence need notbe considered. Moreover, iffiewould have been so it could have mentioned in his oma letter dated10-2-1997 (Exh. 25) , but it is not so As he hue clearly admitted in cross - examination that he had remained unauthorisedly absent for 34 days , the First Party was obviously not required to adduce documentary evidence tothat effect. However, letter dated 10-4-1996 (Bxlt: 1773) speaks about it which has been cowebsented by thiconel testimonyof the First Party wita Pratibu VeineGodes, From the document (Exh: 22), it is clous that the specifis three:warnings were mentioned , onthe top of this form it was clearlywarned that:

1. The Funishing of false information or suppression ofany actual information in the Attestation Form wouldbe a disqualification and is likely to render the candidate unfit for employment under the Government.

2. If detailed, convicted debarred etc. subsequent to the completion and submission of this form the detail shouldbe communicated inmediatoły to the

17. However, i raninly based o of the fhots of tho Fis suppression titisalinitio, countingthimeratiolaid down in the advid sity relied upon by lessmedAndreeater Nik. Giupte, for the Phutluty, andat the same time the authority relied upon by learned Adverste Me: Maindik, for the SecondPlasty court bo rande applicable.

3421

13 , 1931

सोनिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के मुख में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भासंीिय सानिमम के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्मिष्टोमिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सस्कार औद्योगिक अभिनयावालय , सबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीबीमारी/ एससी मार/52/03 ) को प्रभालित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-6-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/275/2002- आईआर (सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

NowDelhi, the 9th June , 2009

S. O. 1864.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Govomment hereby publishes the Award (Ref: CGIT/LC/ R/52/03 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Jabalpuras shown in the Annexure in the Inilustrial Dispatchetwopan thommagament of Food Corpamtion ofindia, Angional Office and their workmen, receivedby the Condral Government on 9-6-2009.

No.1-22012/275/2002-IR(CM- II)]

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, DeskOfficer

DOUNTRAL.TRUML COURT, MBALPUR

NO. COFTLCRAZAB

Fear Bried. Shakir Hasan she saidos, kepping in viow the fets amil cocoonstancos cosmithathon roosst), anti the ratio of the authority selind suportlaydearmaid Athosante Mir Gupte, for the FirstParty, itis copy clear that theSecond Party has gone to the extent oof suppressing this criminal prosecution by giving false Sammationphosnatlesmişloyment, dospite clear-cut warning matinetesattentation Coum filed by him which was idation of the creployment. Subacquently by Pistolac,policoncertiortion report lateil 25-5-1995 (Bah. 17/2 ),étonnertorikeiknovilcidge. if the First Partythat falee anwas given or by thihazately sup theh the fact disn ing or lostroying at and oventually the ec at was also to the withilan . The ratio of the sity in thecomo of Superintendent ofPost Offices and othersar's R. Valasina Baku [ 2007 ( 112) FLR 914) relied upon bydemanati Maharsante il Gupte,fenthe First Darty, stends tosoupporttiswiow. Moreover , admittedly, theaatte ofallee Shacoli Harty wars wery poor and the mined motheriaddiyathaantifor 34days . In those pirmunsstances , whenthecary Gentilation ofthe employment was lostrascted, This services weeredliscontinued sand it does not meant to any illegalstermination oven ifany enquiry wees mat conductetfch.comsinstuchciсанников сiry was nat Bataillanecessary. Khough the support has been tabloon for termiinshion Geramthorised absence of 34 adyans , the wondhandthecutecium was notwaidd anac for termination. Itvacancillinzypact considered bythed Tiesst Party/bustclearly termination was chaseid van giving Filse information by suppressing actual fact of criminal prosecution Haditheen saothat theDecoParty untanud hence, the terminationcantibat gomilisatbailutėly legal .

The Persilent,

FCFKarmachari Parishad,

...Workman /Union

44/26, South T.T.Nagar, Bhopal (MP)

19. Having considered the foregoing discussioκε , conglobulutusand cinematonces , deepping inview the radios of the authorities rélked upon daycake ilearned Athenostoscafcloth the ssibles , II diamatlostly month the comelosion that the First Party didaat Blegally terminate theserviessosfithe Second Party .

The SeniorRegional Manager , Food Corporation ofhaldia, Regional Office,ChetakBalling ,

...Management

WIPNagar,Whepal (MP)

Pasardoon this ist day of June , 2009 20. RUENO.2 :In viewoffthe Tatlingan Isame No. thepurbofithe SecmidParty, Lam ofthe considered opinion thatheissmetataillantitled forakentlief of reinstateneent , hunik wugges amid continuity ofservice, ans proyeil fer . II , therefore , anawenshis Issue No. 2 accordingly, and indthe Guferuanth, passt followingporiler:

ORDER

1. TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour vide its Notifiantiert Nat -28012/ 275 /2012 -IR (CM -II) dated 5-3-2003 has referred the following ilispute for adjudication by this tribunal:

The reference stands rejected with no rider as to

the coasts .

Race Flame

"Whether the action of the management of Food Corporation of India, Bhopal in not paying overtime Howance as prescribed under M.P.Shops & Fistablishment Act , 1998 to the employees working in gedown , sstore , depots and laboratories is degal and justified? If mat, to what relief they are contitled to?"

P.TRAHULE, Prosiding Officer 3922

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

2. The case of the applicant/Union in short is that FCI Karmchari Parishad is a registered Union having about 1500members . It is stated that non -applicant/management ofFCI are not doing payment of the overtime for additional work to the workmen in M.P who , were doing overtime since September, 1989. It is stated that the workman who are working in the godowns , stores , depots and laboratories in FCI in the State of Madhya Pradesh, are entitled for the overtime at the double rate in accordance with law since September, 1989. It is stated that a miscellaneous petition No. 502/90 was filed before the Hon'ble High Court at M. P. Jabalpur wherein the Hon'ble Court asked from the Madhya Pradesh Government Bhopal as to whether M. P. Shop and Establishment Act, 1958 is applicable in the case . The Under Secretary, Government of M. P. Bhopal informed vide letter No. 4/B//97/16-1 dated 13-1-1998 that the workmen ofGodowns , stores, Depots , Laboratories and fields of FCI are within the purview of M. P. Shop and Establishment Act , 1958 ( in short hereinafter referred as MP S & E Act) and only offices areexempted from the purview of M.P. S& E Act, 1958. The applicant/Union sent a registered letter dated 13-10-2001 to the non-applicant/management but even then the payment ofovertime at double rates has not been paid as provided in M.P.S &E Act, 1958. Hence the case .

3. The non - applicant/management has appeared and filed Written Statement . The case of the management, inter alia is that the State Government Notification bearingNo. 70318797 -XVI dated 24-11-1972 ofthe Madhya Pradesh Government shows that the offices of the FCI in the M.P. are exempted from the operation of M.P.S& E Act , 1958 and therefore , the FCI is making payments of overtime to its employees at the single rate of their original rate ofwages since September , 1989. It is stated that the reference is vague and it is made without taking into consideration of the Notification issued by the Government of MP . It is submitted that the reference deserves to be answered in negative .

4. The only question for decision is whether the Madhya Pradesh Shop and Establishments Act, 1958 is applicable to the employees of FCI working in the godowns , stores , depots and laboratories.

5. The applicant/Union has examined oral and documentary evidence in order to prove his case . The Union has filed photocopy of the order dated 25-6-1997 passed by the Hon'ble Court , M.P. , Jabalpur in Misc. Petition No. 502/90 Food Corporation of India V/s. State ofM.P. & another (Paper Nos . 62/5 to 62/7)wherein the Hon'ble Court had directed the Government of M.P. to interpretate the word "Offices " . The Hon'ble Court has held that-

" 7.Inview of the aforesaid position, I do not go into the merits of the matter and dispose off this writ petition with directions as under :

(a).The respondent No.1 shall decide the question of interpretation , as indicated in para -3 of the application above , and shall thus take proper decision whether the petitioner is or is not exempt

[PART IISEC. 3 (ii)] from the compliance of the provisions of Madhya Pradesh Shops and Establishment Act, 1958 within aperiod ofSIX MONTHS from today before taking any action against the petitioner in terms of Annexure-M- I or any other order."

6. The photocopy of the letter No. 4/B/1/97/ 16 A dated13-1-1998 ofUnder Secretary, Labour Department, Government of M. P. (Paper No.10) is also filed which was in compliance of the Misc . Case 502/90 whereby it is clarified by the Government of M.P. that the Godowns , Stores, Depots and Laboratories of Food Corporation of Indialocated in M.P. are not exempted from the purview of M.P. Shop and Establishment Act, 1958 rather only offices are exempted from the said Act. This appears to be proved that the action ofthe management of Food Corporation of India, Bhopal in not paying overtime allowance as prescribedunder M.P.Shops & Establishment Act 1958 working in godown, store, depots and laboratories is not legal andjustified . Photocopy ofthe letter dated 13-10-01 (Paper No. II) is also filed to show that the lawyer of the Union sent letter to the management to pay overtime in accordance with the provision of M.P. S&E Act, 1959 . TheUnionhas also filed list of employees which are paper Nos . 17 to 17/29 . The management witness Anupam B. Vyas has also admitted that these are the lists oftheir employees . The Union has also filed the photocopies of orders which are Paper Nos . 73/3 to 74/42 to show that the employees were ordered to do overtime . Thus the documentary evidence of the applicant/Union proves that M.P. S&E Act, 1958 is applicable to the employees working in gedowns , stores , depots and laboratories.

7.The applicant/Union has also examined witnesses namely Shri Birit Pal Gupta , Shri L. S. Thakur , Shri Chotelal Gupta, Shri Shanker Lal Malviya and Shri D. P.Jharia. They all have supported the case of the Union that they had worked overtime and the payment was not done according to the M. P. S& E Act, 1959. The oral evidence also supports the case of the applicant/Union.

} 8.On the other hand, the non -applicant/management has also adduced oral and documentary evidence . The management has filed State Government, Notification bearing No. 7031-8797XVI dated 24-11-72 which is marked as R/I . The said notification shows that in exercise of power conferred by clause (k ) of sub - clause ( 1 ) of Section 3 ofthe Madhya Pradesh Shop and Establishment Act, 1958 , the State Government exempt the offices ofthe FoodCorporation of India located in the State of Madhya Pradesh from the operation of the said Act . It appears from the discussion made above that the dispute arises with respect to the interpretation of the word "Offices " . A writ petitionwas filed before the Hon'ble High Court which wasMisc . Case 502/90 (Paper No. 65/5 to 65/7) wherein the Hon'ble Court directed the Govt. to interpret the word "Offices" . Subsequently after interpretation , the Government of M.P. issued a letter (Paper No.10) that the godowns , stores , depots and laboratories located in the state of MP are not exempted from the purview of M.P. Shop & Establishment Act, 1958. Thus it is clear that only offices of the FCI is exempted and other establishments of the FCI is not exempted and M.P. (S& E 3923 [भागष्ठ 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़13, 1931

Governmenthereby publishes the Award (Ref.No. CGIT/ LC/R/47/96) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure -in the Industrial Dispute between employers in relation to the management of WCL and their workman, which was receivedbythe Central Government on 9-6-2009.

[No. L-22012/283/1989- IR(C-II)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

Act, 1958 is applicable in those establishment. Thus simply the notification filed by the management has not proved that the action ofthe management in not paying overtime allowance to the employees as per MP S& E Act, 1958 is legal and justified. The non -applicant/management has filed another DO letter EP- 17(2)/96-Vol.III/406 dated 24-9-2003/1-10-2003 which is marked as R/II . This letter shows that the management has sent a letter to Chief Secretary, Government of M.P. for exempting the Food Corporation ofIndia in the State ofM.P. from the provision ofLocal Shops& Establishment Act. This letter itselfshows that the FCI is not exempted from the purview ofM. P. S&E Act and even then the FCI was denying payınent of overtimeas perthe said Act. This letter further proves the case of the applicant/management .

No. CGIT/LC/R/47/96

Presiding Officer : Shri Mohd . ShakirHasan

TheGeneral Secretary, Samyukta Khadan Mazdoor Sangh, PostChandametta,

...Workman/Union

Distt.Chhindwara(MP)

Versus

9. The non-applicant/management has examined onewitness Anupam B. Vyas who is officiating as Deputy General Manager, FCI, Regional Office, Bhopal . He has stated in his evidence that the FCI has made payment of the overtime to the employees at the single rate of their original rate ofwages . This itselfshows that thethe employees of the FCI working in godown, stores , depots and laboratories are not paid as per the provision of M. P. S&E Act, 1958. Thus the evidence of the management. doesnot prove that the action of the management of FCI is legal andjustified.

Dy. ChiefMining Engineer, NandanGroup, WCL, PostNandan, Distt. Chhindwara(MP)

...Management

AWARD

Passed on this2nd day of June , 2009

1. The Government ofIndia, Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No.L-22012/283/89 - IR(C-II) dated 14-2-96 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal :

10. In the result , I direct the non- applicant/ management to examine the list of employees (Paper Nos 17 to 17/29) and if it is found that they have worked overtime and then the difference amount of overtime be paid to them as prescribed in Madhya Pradesh Shop and Establishment Act, 1958 since September, 1989 within three months from the date of award. Accordingly the reference is answered in favour of the applicant and against the non-applicant . As such, the award is passed without the order of costs .

11. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as perrules.

MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN, Presiding Officer

"Whether the five demands raised by the S.K.M.S. vide its letter dated 7-9-1989 against the management ofNandanpur Coal Mines Nos. 1 and 2 of W.C.L. are legal andjustified? Ifso, what reliefthe workmen are entitled to ?"

नई दिल्ली , 9 जून , 2009

2.The case ofthe applicant/ SKMS Union in short is that the Unions namely INTUC, BMS , HMS & AITUC (SKMS) gave a charter of five demands to the managemont ofNandan Mines No. 1 and Nandan Mines No. 2 on 7-9-89. The five demands are as follows :-

(1) Bamboo of Baskets be provided to Tub Loaders.

(2) Tub ofthe capacity of40.5 CFT be provided in Nandan Mines Nos . 1 & 2.

का. आ. 1865. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं डब्ल्यू. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/एलसी/आर/47/96 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-6-2009 को प्राप्त हुमा था ।

सिं एल-22012/283/1989-आईआर ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi, the 9th June , 2009

(3) The illegal deduction ofRs . 10 Avm the payof August of the werkmen be refunded and the said deduction be net satte in the following month'spay.

(4) The verification done by P.M. of Joint Comsnitten ofthe meanbers oftheUnions be set S. O. 1865. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central

228762/09--21 3924

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

aside and the verification of the membershipbe made onthe basis of settlement and the balance amountbepaid.

(5) Workers getting wages without doing any job and misuse of Company's vehicle and other properties be stopped .

Itissubmitted that the local management be directed tomaintaindiscipline and to fulfil the charter of demands oftheApplicant/Union.

3.Onthe other hand, the non -applicant/management has filed Written Statement in the case . The case of the management inter alia , is that Shri S. K. Bannerjee is not holding the post of General Secretary of S.K.M.S. (AITUC) whereas Shri Bharat Singh Sakravar is General Secretary ofthe said Union. It is stated that as per recommendation ofthe constituted committee, the cost of the Bamboo Baskets are being provided to the workmen. In respect of demand No. 2, it is stated that a meeting was held on 8-8-83 between the management and all the four Unions to replace 45 cft Tubs in place of 40.5 cft from 14-11-83 to improve the productivity and accordingly the Tubs were purchased costing of Rs . 66,00,000 . Moreover the wages ofTub Loaders were also increased in view ofthe increased capacity ofTubs . For third demand, it is stated that Rs . 10 was deducted from the pay of workers but on demand the same has already been refunded long back . With respect to 4th demand, it is stated that AITUC Union is under check off system and membership subscription is being deducted from the wages ofthe workers after getting their authority letters . The AITUC (SKMS) Union is also getting the membership subscription as per the check off system which was introduced since 1985. With respect to 5th demand, it is stated that the management has never permitted any worker to get his wages without doing any job. It is submitted that the demands raised by the said Union are notjustified.

4. On perusal of the record , it appears that the Applicant/Union absented and the case proceeded ex parte on 28-3-2006 against Applicant/Union .

5. To prove the case, the management has filed oral and documentary evidence . M/ 1 is charter of five demands which appears to have been filed by all the Unions on 8-9-1989. M/2 is Unions membership list of2000 ofNandan Mines Nos . 1 & 2. It is clear that AITUC (SKMS) is not the biggest Union. Moreover it appears that other Unions who have majority ofmember workers have not raised this issue through the charter of demands shows that all the Unions had raised those demands . M/3 is the record note ofthe discussion held on 29-11-89 on the issue ofBamboo Basket between the management and all the Unions and a decision was arrived to pay the price of the basket to tub loaders instead of providing basket . This shows that this demand is accordingly fulfilled . M/4 is the minutes of discussion made between the Unions and the Management regarding the size of tubs . It is clear from the said minutes that it was resolved by them to replace 45 cft tubs and for that, wages of the tub loaders was also proportionately

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

raised. M/5 is the decision taken for increasing the rate of wages . M/6 is the notice regarding the decision of introducing 45 cft tubs from 20-10-1983 and for payment of wages on enhanced rate. M/7 is a notice of letter of thanks to tub loaders for supporting for inrtoducing 45 cft tubs . Thus it is clear from these documents that all the Unions and the management themselves resolved after discussion to introduce 45 cft tubs and it was also resolved to increase the wages of the tub loaders . This issue is accordingly answered.

6.M/8 is the notice dated 20-11-83 regarding the payment ofRs . 10deducted from the pay of the workman . This shows that the management had already completed thedemandto payRs . 10. Thus all the four demands appear tohavebeen resolved and the management have complied the same.

7.It appears that with respectto the demand No. 5, the burden appears to be on the Applicant/Union that company's property were misused and some of the workmen were getting wages without work . The management has denied the existence ofsuch indiscipline. This issue appears to have been not established against themanagement.

8. The management has also examined one witness Shri A.P. Godse . He has fully supported the case of the management . He has stated that Shri P. K. Bannerjee is not office bearer of the said Union. There is nothing on the record to show that he was office bearer of the said Union . He has supported the documents filed on behalf of the management. Those documents clearly show that the demands as had been made by the Unions , were fulfilled and thereafter, there was no dispute. There is no other evidence to contradict the evidence adduced by the management. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence ofthe management.

9. Inthe result, the reference is accordingly answered and award is passed ex parte in favour of the management and against the Applicant/Union.

10. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government ofIndia, Ministry of Labour &Employment as perrules.

MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 9 जून , 2009

का. आ. 1866. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सीनियर सुपरिन्टेण्डेंट ऑफ पोस्ट आफिसेस के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकतर औद्योगिक अधिकरण, नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 27/2005) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-6-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

) [सं. एल -40012/ 153/2004- आई सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

NewDelhi , the 9th June , 2009

S..O. 1866. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref.No. 27/ 2005) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the Employers in relation to the management of Senior Superintendent ofPost Offices and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 9-6-2009 .

3925

भारत का राजपत्र: जुलाई 4, 2009/ आषाढ़ 13 , 1931

was not convinced and he made a false report after recording the statement of Charandas and Umesh . Those statements werenot recorded by him as per their version and initiated an enquiry with the charges of misappropriation of the government amount. The I.O. recorded the perverse findings . He suggested the dismissal of the Petitioner. The management wrongly acted upon it and dismissed him . According to him the order is illegal. The punishment is also shockingly disproprotionate to the misconduct ofthe Petitioner. He has prayed to set aside the above orucu dt. 17-12-2002 removing him from the service.

[No. L- 40012/ 153/2004- IR(DU) ]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI A. N. YADAV PRESIDING OFFICER CGIT-CUM- LABOUR COURT. NAGPUR.

Case NO . 27/2005

Date : 29-5-2009

Sh.DeoraoNagobaji Pimpalkar Age-45 Years R/o - Virur Gadegaon

...PartyNo. 1 Tehsil - Korpana Distt.- Chandrapur.

Versus

Senior Supdt . of Post Offices ChandaDivision, Chandrapur

R/O, Tehsil and District- Chandrapur.

...PartyNo.2

AWARD

29-5-2009

The Central Government after satisfying the existence of disputes between Sh.Deorao Nagobaji Pimpalkar Age 45 Years R/ o Virur Gadegaon, Tahsil Korapna Distt. Chandrapur.Party No.1 and Sr.Supdt . of post offices Chanda division Chandrapur Party No.2 referred the same for adjudication to this Tribunal vide its letterNo. L-40012/ 153 /2004- IR (DU) dt . 23-03-2005 under clause (d) of sub section (1) and sub section (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) with the following schedule:

"Whether the action of the management in relation to Sr. Supdt . of Post Offices , Chandrapur in terminating the services of Sh Deorao Nagobaji Pimpalkar, Branch Post Master Virur Gadegaon is legal andjustified? Ifnot, what is the reliefto which the workman is entitled? "

It is the case of the petitioner Sh.Deorao Nagobaji Pimpalkar that while working as a Branch Post Master at VirurGadegaon, he inadvertently committed a mistake of changing the dates in the official stamps . He wrongly on 18-11-97 changed the date on the stamp as 28-10-97 on which one Shri Charandas Pausu Karmarkar has deposited the amount of Rs . 2000 in his saving bank account No. 48121306. Similarly, he wrongly changed the date on 10-10-97 also and in stead of it he set the date as 3-10-97 on that date on Umesh Chimurkar deposited the amount of Rs . 200/- in his R. D. Account bearing No.812398 . At the timeofinspection, the Sub- divisional inspector of the post Themanagement supported its order and denied that it is perverse. Similarly it has also denied that the punishment isshockingly disproportionate to the misconduct of the Petitioner. Ithas denied that the petitioner has inadvertently changed the dates on a stamp or set it wrongly. He has accepted the deposit of Rs.200/- for depositing it in A/ c No. 812398 from Umesh Chimurkar on 3-10-97 . He made the entries in the Pass Book for the month of October , November, 1997. He impressed the stamp without fixing the date and time and signed it. He did not take a entry in the Recurring Deposit Register and amount was also not accounted in the branch post office on 3-10-97 . In his own handwriting he collected the date in the pass book for the month ofOctober, 1997, but he could not make the entry of November, 97. Similarly, he received the amount of Rs.200 from Charandas for depositing it in the A/c No.48121306 on 28-10-1997. He impressed the stamp but wrote the date in handwriting he also did not take the entry of the deposit andaccountedthe amount in the branch ofpost office on 28-10-97 . In view of this serious misconduct he was charge sheeted on 26-11-98 and after due enquiry and giving full opportunity to the petitioner above punishment was awarded. It has prayed to dismiss the reference of the Petitioner.

It being the dismissal after domestic enquiry with a view to consider its validity the case was fixed for evidence and argument. However , the Petitioner admitted the validity ofthe enquiry by filing Pursis . He has , however, challenged the findings of the enquiry officer alleging it as a perverse. He challengedthe ratio of punishment also . He contended that it is shockingly disproportionate .

The Petitioner adduced the evidence to prove his caseby examining himself. The management also examined itsAssistant Superintendent ofthe PostOffices. Theyboth are cross-examined by the opposite party. The Petitioner has stated that it was inadvertent mistake committed in setting the date on the stamp. Therefore, though the amount ofdeposited on the date as stated by him but the date of depositing as per the stamp of the post office was wrong. Itwas shown as antedated. Thus , according to him he has not misappropriated the amount and it happened onlydue to the wrong setting of the date on the postal stamp. It appears that the submission of the Petitioner is totally baseless . The record indicate that he has accepted the amount on the dates of which the stamp was impressed, buthe later on in his own handwriting without setting any 3926

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)]

New Delhi, the 9th June, 2008.

S. O. 1867.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes theArwand Rof.No. CGIT/ LC/R/6/95 of the Central Govt . Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the Employers in relation to the management of Chief Post Master General, and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 9-6-2009.

[F.No. L-40011/9/93-IR(DU)]

SURENDRA SINGH, Deak Officer

ANNEXURE

MEPORE THIE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/6/95

PresidingOfficer : Shri Mohd Shakir Hasan

TheCircle Secretary,

All India RMS Avam Motor Dak Sewa Sangh,

132, MahatmaGandhi Marg,

-Workman/Union

Ratlam(MP)

Versus

The ChiefPost Master General ,

M.P.Cirole, Bhopal

-Management

AWARD

date on the stamp wrote it in his own hand writing and showed the deposits on the subsequent dates than which hehas accepted. There is documentary evidence as well as oral evidence of Charansingh and Umesh . Since he has written the dates in his own handwriting keeping the blank space in stead of setting the dates in them . It was his deliberate attempt to grab the amount . Obviously, he has wived the amount from above two persons Rs.2000/- and Rs.200/ - respectively and used it for his own purposes without showing the deposit in the office record . He did nottake entry in the register ofdeposits in time and triedto show deposits on a subsequent date. It is a clear case of misappropriation . He actually accepted the amount on the dates on which the above two persons have paid to the Petitioner but he deliberately shown them as deposited on the subsequent dates and during the intervening period hemisappropriate the amount using it for own purposes. Though temporary it is misappropriation of the Govt . amount, a serious misconduct evenjustifying the criminal action. It has caused a loss at least of the interest of the two customers Charandas and Umesh. There is sufficient evidence documentary as well as oral to prove it . There are no reasons at all to disbelieve it . Similarly, story of the Petitioner that it was inadvertent mistake is also after thought made with the motive to escape from the clutches of law. However, his attempt is poor and unbelievable . In any case it cannot be called as perverse and blame the Inquiry Officer . The findings of the Inquiry Officer are proper. They cannot be called as perverse . The evidence establishes that the Petitioner by showing the late deposit inthe Saving Bank Account misappropriated the amount.

Passed on this 2nd day of June, 2009

1. TheGovernment of India, Ministry ofLabour vide its Notification No.L-40011 /9/93 /AR(DU) dated 29-12-94 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

Similarly, when it is as case of misappropriation he has rightly suggested the punishment of dismissal . The punishment imposed by the Postal Authority or the management cannot be called as disproportionate for the purpose of a misappropriation though it may be of a small amount it cannot be said as disproportionate . In my view alsothe management was right imposing the punishment of dismissal . It cannot be interfere and the reference deserves tobe dismissed . Accordingly I dismissed it and pass this negativeAward.

"Whether the action of the management of Chief PostMasterGeneral M.P.Circle Bhopal for not giving temporary status to the workers Annexed in the list (50wovlars) is justified or not? Ifnot, towhat relief theworlumen are entitled?"

Date,29-5-2009

A. N. YADAY, PresidingOfficer

नईदिल्ली, 9 जून , 2009

का. आ. 1867.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार चीफ पोस्ट मास्टर जनरल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई टी/एलसी/ आर/6/95 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-6-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[फा. सं. एल-40011/9/93- आई आर ( डीयू]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

2. The case of the Applicant/Union in short that theChiefPost Master General has engaged a good number ofworkers in the Railway Mail Services at various places and they are entitled for temporary status as they have completed their works for 240 days in a calendar year. It is stated that the department took decision to give temporary status to these workers in view of the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court who had completed 240 days (206 days in the same office observing 5 days week) in a calendar year. It is stated that the decision of the department was circuinted among the officers concerned who started to engage theworkers continuously for eight hours but they had shown only seven hours on the record . Thereafter they started to give job for 4-5 hours a day to debar the entitlement of the benefit to temporary status .

3927 भारत कन राजप सई 4, 2009/ आवाड 13 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii)]

3. The further case is that the workers, as per list of order ofthe reference, are engaged for 8 hours a day but the management has manipulated the records to show that the workers have worked only 4-5 hours a day. It is stated that theworkers as per list has completed 240 days services and as such they are entitled to be treated as temporary status . It is submitted to hold that the action of the management is unjustified and the workers are entitledto temporary status with consequential benefits .

show that after passing order of the Hon'ble CAT, the management examined the services ofworkmen and gave temporary status to the workmen who are also in this order ofreference. The evidence further shows that some of the workmen are denied to grant temporary status by the management. The Union appears to have challenged that the management has manipulated in implementing against some oftheworkmen who are referred to grant same status. This shows that the Union has to raise the issue against the action of the management before the same Tribunal which appears to be the proper forum in this case as it is simply related to the matter of implementation ofthe order ofthe CAT, Jabalpur.

4. The management has not filed any written statement. It is clear that the management has no case. Surprisingly the management has examined one witness ShriB.L.Jha without any pleading .

8.Inthe result, the reference is accordingly answered . Hence the award is passed in favour of the management and against the Union but with no orders as to costs.

9. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry ofLabour and Employment asper rules.

5.The foremost question is as to whether the action ofthe management of ChiefPost Master General MP Circle, Bhopal (MP) for not giving temporary status to the workmen as per list of order of the reference is fit to be raisedbefore the Central Administrative Tribunal , Jabalpur or not .

MOHD SHAKIR HASAN, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 9 जून; 2009

का. आ. 1868.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार हान्मकान्ग एन्ड सन्धाई बैंकिंग कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण न. II , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 18/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-6-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/32/2006- आई आर ( बी- I ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी 6.Now letus examine the evidence of the applicant/ Union on the above point . It is an admitted fact that the workmenhad filed an original application under Section-19 of the Administrative . Tribunal Act before the Central Administrative Tribunal , Jabalpur which was registeredas O.A.No. 252/95 Rajeev Kumar Srivastava & others versus Union of India & others . The said case was admittedly decided vide Judgement dated 9-12-1996 wherein the Hon'bleCourt had directed the management to examine the caseofthe applicants and if it is found that they had put in more than 240 days ofengagement in a year, the applicants betreated as casual employees having acquired temporary status and thereafter consider them for regular appointment in Group " D " on the basis of their seniority.

New Delhi , the 9th June , 2009

S. O. 1868. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref.No.18/2006) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court II , Delhi as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 9-6- 2009

[No. L- 12012/32/2006- IR(B-1) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR COURT NO. IL, ROOM NO.33, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, BLOCK-A DELHI-110032

Inthe matter of industrial dispute between:

ID No. 18/2006

...Workman

MsManju Saxena

D-601 UNESCO Apartment

55 J.P. Extension

Delhi-110092

7. The question is as to whether the workmen who are referred in this order of reference, were also parties to the case No. O.A.No. 252/95 before the Central Administrative Tribunal , Jabalpur . The applicant/Union has filedthe photocopy ofthe judgement dated 9-12-96 ofcase No. OA.252/ 1995 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench, Jabalpur. The said judgement shows that Shri Rajeev Kumar Sharma & 55 others were applicants in the case . The applicant/Union has also examined oral evidence in the case . Wazid Khan, Rajeev Kumar Sharma, Md.Unis Khan, Mahendra Singh Sisodia and R.K.Sharma are the witnesses examined by the Union. All have stated in their evidence that as the matter was getting delayed, the following individuals whose names are enlisted with the order of reference alongwith others filed a petition vide O.A.No.252 of 1995 in the name of Rajeev Kumar Sharma & 55 others versus union of India and the Chief Post Master General , MP Postal Circle , Dak Bhawan, Bhopal before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench . It is evident from the evidence of the witnesses that the workmen are same who were also in the case No. O.A.252/ 1995 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur . The evidences ofthe withesses further 3928

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4 , 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ] Versus

The ChiefExecutive Officer

....Management

The Hongkong and Shanghai

Banking Corporation Limited

52/60Mahatma Gandhi Road PO Box No. 128 , Mumbai -400 001

AWARD

The Bank has offered you a generous severance package, which it is now clear that you are not prepared to accept . The Bank also favourably considered your request forbeing accommodated in some alternate job . In the past four months since May, 2005, the Bank has offered you several job opportunities at various points of time viz . BusinessDevelopment Officer , Customer Service Officer , Clearing Officer, Banking Services Officer etc. However , you have not expressed your willingness to accept any of the above job opportunities , nor have you accepted the generous redundancy package offered to you .

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide OrderNo. L- 12012/32/2006 -IR (B- 1) dated 08-03-2006 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication: →

"Whether the action of the Chief Executive Officer , HSBC , India Area Management Office, 52/60, Mahatma Gandhi Road, P.O. Box 128 , Mumbai-400001, in terminating the services of Mrs. Manju Saxena, StaffOfficer w.e.f. 1-10-2005 without giving her full terminal benefits is just, valid and legal? If not, to whatbenefits the workman is entitled for and what directions are necessary in the matter. "

3. In the circumstances, the Bank has no alternative but to terminate your services with effect from close of workinghours of 1 October 2005. The Bank shall be paying you sixmonths ' of compensation in lieu ofNotice period as provided in your contract of employment. In addition , although not eligible , as a special case , you are also being paid compensation equivalent to fifteen days' salary for every completed year of service. These amounts totaling to INR 817,071 ( Indian Rupees Eight Lacs Seventeen Thousand and Seventy One only) have been credited to your salaryaccount yesterday. This is subject to deduction ofapplicabletax.

You are further requested to get in touch with North India Human Resource Department for the full and final settlement of your dues with the Bank.

Yourssincerely,

)

Sd/- ShishirAgarwal

Manager Employee Relations " 2. The workman has filed her statement of claim in which she has submitted that she was in the employment of the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (HSBC) (hereinafter referred to as the management/ management bank) during the period 10th March , 1986 and IstOctober 2005 ( close of the working hours) . While the claimant was holding the post of Senior Confidential Secretary, her services were terminated by the management vide its decision dated 1st October, 2005 , arbitrarily and illegally and in blatant violation of the Industrial Disputes Act1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), and in utter disregard to the principles of natural justice on the alleged grounds:-

(a) that the post the claimant was holding had become redundant;

(b) that the claimant had failed to accept any ofthe job opportunities provided to her ; and

3. It is further the case of the claimant/ workman that she was required to execute an agreement with the terms and conditions of the service before taking up her job in 1986. Accordingly, she has executed an agreement with terms ofreference on 27-12-1986 . That the duties entrusted to her post were primarily to assist the attached officer in the performance of that officer's functions . A copy of the said agreement and terms ofreference has also been annexed with the statement of claim as Annexure A/ 2 .

Acopy of the impugned order dated 1-10-2005 has been annexed as Annex . A/I along with the statement of claim . The said letter is as under :--

HSBC

Manju Saxena Employee No. 186099

NewDelhi

1stOctober 2005

Sub: Termination of Employment.

Manju,

The question of your current job becoming redundant from May, 2005 has been a subject matter of discussions and correspondence culminating in a meeting with Mr. Ashish K Srivastava on 23rd September, 2005 in Mumbai.

4. Itis also the case of the claimant/workman that at her conscious option she was transferred to new terms of service of employment w.e.f. 1-10-2004 and was placed in SO Band 2 by the management while her designation continued as Senior Confidential Secretary. New terms and conditions , with its annexure and letter dated 21-11-2004 of the management , transferring her to the new terms collectivelyhas been annexed as Annexure A/3 along with statement of claim . On her placement in SO Band 2, the claimant was informed that (a) she will be receiving a total reward of INR 732,736 PER ANNUM COMPRISING Base Salary, General Allowance , HRA , LTA, Medical and Benefit Allowance , PF, Gratuity and a bonus of Rs . 48,200 per annum (b) that her monthly pension , gratuity, leave encashment amounts along with accumulated leave account 3929 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii)]

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13 , 1931

Claimant raised these issues before the management through e-mails sent by her on 26th May, 9th Sept. , 28th Sept. and on 29th Sept. 2005.

was frozen with a rider to be payable at the time of retirement/ resignation. However, it is pertinent to submit before the Hon'ble Court that the claimant was not furnished with any break-up details as to the calculation of the frozen pension, gratuity, and leave encashment amounts . Statement of Management in this regard is annexed as Annexure A/4.

8. The claimant opted to new terms of employment with effect from 1-10-2004 . As she had completed one year of service as on 1-10-2005, 1/3rd component ofbenefit allowance ofRs . 31,000 ( Rupees thirty -one thousand only) stood transferred and became a part of the basic wage by merger and rest 2/3 rd remaining as benefit allowance as on 1-10-2005 . However, the management refused to include the benefit allowance as a component of her wages , which is contrary to the provisions of the Act. Management is prohibited to differentiate wages in respect of a worker and must strictly follow the terms ' wages ' defined under the Act.

9. That as on 1-10-2005 , claimant's basic wage increased by merger of 1/3rd of benefit allowance component thereby giving her the benefit of attendant incremental raises in other allowances , pensionery benefits, gratuity, bonus , etc. , as per the new terms of service she opted as on 1-10-2004. Statement herein below indicates the wage structure ofthe claimant year- wise after opting to new terms:

INR

HRA/ Month

LTA/Month

Basic Wage

Medical Month

Benefit Allowance

09/05 19280

4800

31000 1250

2000 5. The claimant has further submitted that during May, 2005 she was informed by the management that due to the reason that services of her officer , Ms Nancy Dickinson, Senior Manager , NDH were dispensed with , herpost ofSenior Confidential Secretary became redundant and that her services were to be utilized in the meantimeby giving her other duties as well but without any additional remuneration. That the management was trying to locate alternative job and she was referred to choose anyone alternative that was offered to her in the near future . Her refusal either to discharge additional functions or refusal to do alternative jobs would lead to her dismissal . The claimant was also told that the management was at liberty to dismiss her with a six months notice as per agreement she had signed. Due to fear of losing her job, she had to handle additional work/take up additional responsibilities . However, theproposal of the management requiring her to choose jobs such as Business Development Officer , Customer Service Officer , Clearing Officer , Banking ServicesOfficer, etc. , were not acceptable to her as such jobs were either temporary in nature or she was not possessing experience or work knowledge to take up such jobs. She made these aspects clear to the management.

10/05 29613

20667

10/06 39946

10334

10/07 50279

Given below is the entitlement of claimant to severance package which amount the management is denying by refusing to include benefit allowances as a component ofwages :-

OptionA

OptionB

Service put in 19 years onthe date of severance i.e. on 01-10-2005 :

Ifthe petitioner were to continue inher post till Superannuation (Year 2019) 14years

168 months x Rs . 58,330 PM

Rs. 117,593,280

10 Years 120 months @Rs. 58,330 per month Severance Package = Rs.6,99,960 6. That the management vide e -mail dated 24 May, 2005 informed the claimant that there was no role of Senior Secretary and there was no vacancy of that cadre in that area and so she must leave by accepting severance package in line with what was being offered to other members ofthe staff. However , this commitment on the part of the management with regard to severance package to be in line with what was being offered to other members of the staff was not adhered to . Severance package offered to the claimant did not include full component of wages (two- third of the benefit allowance ) forming part ofwages and it was not included and ignored . Further , the management did not agree to waive off housing loan outstanding in her name though the same benefit of waiver was extended to a number ofother colleagues , viz. Ms. Gita Rajagopalan, Ms. Poonam Garg, etc. Thus , the terms and conditions of the severance package were discriminatory between similarly placed workers and it was in utter disregard of the provisions of paragraph 4 of the terms of agreement of 1986.

7.Paragraph4 ofthe terms ofagreement dated27-12-86 isas under :

As per the commitment of the management to pay wages for 10 years to claimant as severance package , she is entitled to Rs . 69,99,600 as severance package. The amount arrived at is based on the wages which the claimant was drawing as on30-9-2005 and before drawal of increment as on 01-10-2005 . With consequential increases in other allowances and drawal of increment, the package figure need to be revised and recalculated as admissible on 1-10-2005 .

"The other service conditions shall be governed by the rules and regulations of the Bank for the category to which the employee belangs from time to time in force." 3930

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009 /ASADHA 13 , 1931

10. It is further the case of the claimant/workman thatwhile negotiations were continuing and clarifications being sought on the discrepancy being meted out to her with regard to the severance package and even before the claimant was given a fair opportunity to decide on the issue, her services were arbitrarily and unilaterally terminated vide impugned order dated 1-10-2005. The claimant was further informed about credit of her salary accountwith six months pay in lieu ofnotice.

11. The claimant has further submitted that she is a victim of the colourable exercise of power by the management and termination was made under cover of clauses IV (termination of employment ) and VI (Duties , responsibilities and obligations ) applicable to Confidential Secretaries read with para 1 and 4 of the agreement signed by her. That many of the clauses of the agreement were in unequal terms as the employer was biased and it was vested with per se powers to the disadvantage of the workers . Being unequal in terms , the agreement signed by the claimant is null and void , being violative of the constitutional provisions of Article 14 and 16 as also contrary to the objects and provisions of the Act . That all relevant provisions ofthe Act applicable to the claimant as an industrial worker under Section 2 and 25 were violated.

12. That the claimant is an industrial worker as defined under Section 2 ( s ) of the Industrial Disputes Act . Termination of services of an industrial worker amounts to retrenchment when such a termination is for any reason whatsoever other than as a measure of punishment inflicted by way of discriminatory action. That the reasons given bythe management in its impugned order dated 01-10-2005, as quoted above, were clearly different . Termination of service ofthe workmen thus is in violation of Section 2(00) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act 1947. It tantamount to unfair labour practices . That the termination order was also not in good faith, a colourable exercise ofthe employer's right as may be evinced by the agreement which the petitioner was compelled to sign at the time ofjoining her service in the year 1986. Further , the order of termination did not spell out the reason for departing from the rule of ' last come first go' and juniors to her were retained in service.

13. It is also the case of claimant that when proceedings were pending before the Conciliation Officer, in utter disregard of the provisions of Section 33 of the Act, the management had effected recovery ofthe monthly installments of the Housing Loan ofRs . 13,826/- (Rupees thirteenthousand eight hundred twenty-six only) and raised debit unauthorizedly and clandestinely against the personal Savings Bank account of the claimant being maintained in themanagement bank .

14. In para 5 ofher statement of claim , the claimant/ workman has also submitted as under :-

" It is further to humbly submit before this Hon'ble Court that because of vindictive and coercive actions

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] adopted by the management to the detriment of the rights of industrial workers , as evidenced not only in her own case but also in respect of a number of her colleagues who were either forced to resign defenceless and unceremoniously or whose services have been terninated illegally by the management during the past several years , there is an approbension in her mind that nothing prevents the management to adopt similar vindictive tactics in her future service in the Bank, such tactics may perhaps be more conveniently manipulated to meet the requirements ofthe Act, so asto eject her from service on flimsy grounds , and therefore , the claimant resolved to opt out from the services of the Bank as she has no faith in management's employee relations."

) 15. The claimant/workoman has therefore prayed this Tribunal to declare the termination orders issued by the management in her case as void ab initio and a nullity before the eyes of law. She has further prayed to declare the claimant as continued in service without interruption from the date ofher illegal termination with all consequential benefits including payment of wages last drawn with accrued periodical increments subsequent to illegal terminstion; with other benefits such as annual revision in her pay as per standard norms applied in respect of other co-workers in the category in which the claimant was employed since she has a rightto reinstatement with continuity in service and right to wages as declared by Hon'ble Supreme Court in DC & G Mills vs. ShambhuNath AIR 1979 SC 88 and State ofBombayvs. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha(1990) 1 LLJ 251 SC.

16. She has also prayed for an order for payment of:

(a) Severance package money on the basis of calculations averred in sub -paragraph 3.3 and 3.4 supra after taking into account the wages admissible to complainant (as on 1.10.2005) as shewas compelled to sacrifice her job for the reasons explained in paragraph 5 supra. As per claimant' wage entitlement, the severance package amount calculated as per the new terms of service (at INR 58,330 (Rupees fifty eight thousand three hundred thirty only per month) and on the basis of wages drawn as on 30-09-2005commes to Rs . INR 69,99,960 (Rupees sixty- nine lacs ninety nine thousand nine hundred sixty only) and to be re-calculated on the basis ofwages last drawn and as on 1-10-2005; for which the claimant is entitled to;

(b) Payment of incremental benefits arising due to increase in basic wages of the claimant as on 1-10-2005 relatable to raise in allowances , increase in pensionery benefits , increases in gratuity payments , bonus payments , etc. , as admissible to her on the basis ofnew terms and 3931 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13 , 1931

conditions she had opted beginning 1st October 2004 and as confirmed by management vide its letter dated 1-10-2004.

(c) Order payment of bonus for the relevant years the claimant was denied bonus as per the norms applicable to the category of workers she belonged to and in accordance with the provisions contained in the agreement she had executed at the time ofjoining service or in the event ifany of the industrial workers including any member ofOfficers' cadre disbursed a higher rate ofbonus calculated differently by adopting different norms in their cases whereby they were disbursed a higher bonus for any of the years , at such higher rates in accordance with statutory provisions contained in the Payment ofBonus Act1965 .

(d) Order payment of Provident Fund as full and complete settlement with detailed break-up of the calculations of the Account year -wise during her entire service ; as the maintenance of her PF Accounts by management require adequate security as the claimant not having any confidence in the management of arrearsby PF Trust;

(e) Order full waiver of outstanding Housing Loans without any discrimination as was allowed in respect of her colleagues namely Ms. Poonam Garg/Gita Rajagopalan and other colleagues in her grade and as averred by claimant in paragraph 3.2 supra .

services of the bank on 10th March 1986 and continued in its employment till 1st October 2005. However, they have repudiated that the claimant was employed in workman category as defined under Section 2( s) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947. It is further denied that the services of the claimant were terminated either illegally or arbitrarily as has been alleged by her. On the contrary, the claimant vide letter dated 1st October , 2005 was informed that her current job in the grade of a Staff Officer had become redundant fromMay, 2005. It is submitted that she had been offered a generous severance package ; as also been offered to be accommodated in some alternative job , viz . Business Development Officer, Customer Service Officer, Clearing Officer, Banking Service Officer and the like . However, the claimant did not express her willingness in any of the aforesaid job opportunities nor she had accepted the generous redundancy package offered to her which amounted to Rs . 57,29,533 (Rupees fifty-seven lacs twenty- nine thousand five hundred thirty-three only) . In the aforesaid circumstances , the bank had no alternative but to terminate the services of the claimant on October 1 , 2005.On that occasion , the bank also paid the claimant six months' salary as compensation in lieu of the notice period as provided in her contract of employment . Further , although the claimant was not eligible, but as a special case, she was paid compensation equivalent to 15 days of salary for every completed year of service amounting to Rs . 8,17,071 ( Rupees eight lacs seventeen thousand seventy-one only) . It was further mentioned that she should get in touch with North India Human Resource Department to settle her dues with the bank. Hence , the allegation of the claimant that the action of the Bank was in utter disregard to the principles of natural justice is false .

(f) Order final and full settlement towards encashment of leave as per last wages drawn. including release of frozen amounts with full break-up figures with details of break-up in arriving the frozen amounts ;

(g) Order payment ofGratuity strictly in accordance with the statutory provisions taking into account full wages defined under the Act and inclusive of frozen amounts with full break-up details.

(h) Order payment ofpension for life with full break- up details furnished as to the calculation and arrival of pension amounts in respect of the petitioner along with break- up details of pension frozen as on 1-10-2004 as the claimant was left with more than 14 (fourteen) years of service left before normal superannuation .

The claimant has also prayed for costs towards legal expenses incurred by her in pursuing this case in this Court.

17. The management bank contested the claim ofthe workman and has filed a written statement. The management bankhas admitted to the extent that the claimantjoined the

18. The management has further submitted that standard procedure was followed while employing the claimant in the bank. That admittedly the complainant consciously and voluntarily opted and accepted the new terms ofservice ofemployment with effect from 1st October, 2004. Admittedly, she was placed in the Staff Officer Band 2and that too at the top end of the Grade/Band . The nature of duties then entrusted to her was those of an officer and not a workman as postulated as per Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947. Admittedly, the claimant on herplacement in Staff Officer Bank, 2 was paid an annual package of Rs . 7,32,736/- (Rupees seven lacs thirty -two thousand seven hundred thirty- six only) comprising basic salary, benefit allowance and general allowance; viz. house rent allowance, leave, and medical allowance . In addition, she was assured for the year 2004 an annual bonus of Rs. 48,200/- (Rupees forty-eight thousand two hundred only) as also contribution towards payment of provident fund and gratuity. That prior to these proceedings the claimant did not ever make any request that a copy of the break-up details as also the calculation be furnished to her. However, the same were always available with the Human Resource Department of the bank .

228761/09-22 3932

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ ASADHA 13 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]

tendered to the claimant vide letter dated October 01 , 2005 is legal , valid and proper . She is not eligible or entitled to receive any further or additional payments whatsoever under the law.

21. It is further pleaded by the Bank that they never agreed to waive off the outstanding housing loan of the claimant ashas been alleged by her . That the claimant was giventhe deadline to accept the offer of the bank latest by September 30 , 2005 and obviously thereafter the Bank would necessarily exercise their option to terminate the services ofthe claimant in accordance with the contract of employment. Hence , the services of the claimant stood terminated onOctober 01 , 2005. That the amount paid or payable to the claimant under the head 'Benefit Allowance' , being not the basic salary , cannot attract any computation towards the severance package. No employee has ever beenpaid severance compensation by including the benefit allowance component . That the computation set out by the claimant is wholly perverse, incorrect and therefore repudiated. It is further the case of the management bank that employment in the bank is not covered by the constitutional provisions but are grounded and determined by the terms of the agreement/contract by and between theemployee and the bank. Further, the said terms ofservice have been uniformly applied to all employees under the supervisory, administrative and the managerial cadres of thebank.

19. That admittedly, during May 2005 the claimant was informed by the Bank that the post of Ms. Nancy Dickinson, Senior Manager , Northern India, had been abolished. Consequently, the post of Senior Confidential Secretaryhad also become redundant and that the services ofthe claimant were to be utilized in an alternative job . Accordingly , she was offered the post of Business Development Officer, Customer Service Officer , Clearings Officer andBanking Services Officer. However , the claimant declined all such offers made to her . It is specifically repudiated by the bank, that the said assignments were temporary in nature or the claimant did not have the necessary experience or work knowledge to take up such jobs and assignments . In fact, her consistent agenda was to extract from the bank as much money as she could on the plea that she did not possess experience or work knowledge to take up the various jobs offered to her . It is admitted by the management bank that the claimant had rendered unblemished service with the bank for 19 years and during her career in the bank she had handled various assignments and had necessary experience , expertise and wherewithal to render competent services to the bank . It is asserted that the bank left no stone unturned to provide alternative employment to the claimant while she was employed with the bank. However, in view of her adamant attitude and approach , the bank was left with no other option but to discharge her from services of the bank without casting any stigma and tendering to her all her statutory dues in full and final including compensation equivalent to fifteen days salary for every completed year of service . Consequently, the action of the Bank is legal , valid , and proper and therefore cannot be sought to be challenged in these proceedings .

22. In reply to paragraph 5 of the statement ofclaim, the management bank has submitted that the bare perusal ofher assertions makes it abundantly clear that she is not interested in the employment of the bank but her single point agenda is to demand from the Bank as much money as she can . Her such conduct and attitude is wholly unacceptable. That through these proceedings the claimant has tried to tarnish the image , reputation and goodwill of theBank. That jurisdiction ofthis Tribunal is limited to the terms of reference for adjudication . There is no amount whatsoever due or payable to the claimant .

23. As regards the alleged discrimination regarding housing loan, it is submitted by the Bank that at the relevant time when Ms. Poonam Garg and Ms. Geeta Rajagopalan had voluntarily left the services of the Bank, the Housing Loans Scheme including its repayment was entirely different and distinct . In fact, subsequentto 2004 the bank had entered into an agreement whereby the housing loan of staff of all management staff members was converted into a simple housing loan taken by any Indian citizenbeing a customer of the Bank. Hence , it is perverse that there was any discrimination meted out to the claimant in respect of outstanding housing loan.

24. Regarding pension, it is submitted that as per the revised scheme, pension could be granted on early retirement after attaining 45 years of age or a period of service not less than 20 years . In the case of the claimant her length ofservice was 19 years 6 months and her age on 20. It is admitted that e - mails were exchanged between the bank and the claimant . That the severance package offered by the bank to its employees varied from time to time based on each individual case . That while computing the severance package the bank had ensured that the employee concerned received all statutory payments . That they received payments far in excess to what was payable to them in terms of their respective contracts of employment . That averments and assertions made by the claimant in paragraph 3.2 of the statement of claim are farbeyond the scope and jurisdiction of the terms ofreference for adjudication as set out in Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Consequently, this Tribunal need not consider or entertain the said averments . That in fact the services of the claimant were terminated on tendering to her all dues and payments including statutory ones notwithstanding the fact that the claimant is not a workman within the ambit , meaning and scope of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. In fact the terms ofreference issued by the appropriate Government describe the claimant Ms. Manju Saxena as Staff Officer and prima facie she is not eligible to invoke the jurisdiction of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. Accordingly, the payment 3933 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपन: जुलाई 4, 2009/आषाढ़ 13 , 1931-

that date was 43 years and 3 months, her date of birth being June 10, 1962. In the circumstances , the claimant did not fulfil the criteria to receive pension for life.

itwill create a flatter organization structure supporting business alignment and improving communication. Finally, itwill move employee focus towards acquiring skills rather than rewarding seniority and chasing grades . The new grading structure will be supported by the current hay job evaluation process and defined based on a range of hay scores.A comprehensive exercise has been conducted to ensure evaluation is up to date prior to conversion. Scores have been established for new jobs and scores have been revised for jobs which have undergone recent changes . Future new and revised jobs will continue to be placed to appropriate bands based on job evaluation results." 25. Ultimately, it is submitted by the Bank that in the circumstances, the claimant is not eligible and/ or entitled to any relief whatsoever including the sums of money claimed and demanded from the Bank by her. This Court should therefore impose exemplary costs on the claimant forhaving raised frivolous and vexatious claim against the Bank and has left no stone unturned to bring disrepute to the Bank. An Award favouring the Bank should therefore be passed in this case.

26. In her rejoinder, the claimant refuted the stand taken by the management Bank and has re-asserted her claim made in her statement ofclaim .

Thus, under the new broad- banded structure there willbe less emphasis on visible status . The broad bandwill allowmore flexibility in internal movements which will benefit those who grasp the opportunity to learn new skills and gaintheexposure that another post will provide.Essentially, it will provide greater choice for individual career management.

27. In support of her case, the claimant Ms. Manju Saxena has filed her evidence by way of an affidavit. She, has been subjected to detailed cross -examination by the Ld. A.R. of the management Bank . In rebuttal to that, the management has examined Ms. Niti Chopra, its Vice President, Human Resource , Northern India. She has also filed her evidence by way ofan affidavit. She too has been cross-examined in detail by the workman.

28. I have heard the workman at length who has argued her case personally. I have also heard the Ld. A.R. ofthe management. I have perused the record and also the written submissions placed on record by both the sides . I have also gone through the various authorities relied upon byboth the parties .

31. It is now a settled position in law that an undue importance need not be given to the designation of an employee, or the class to which he belongs. A nomenclature and designation are not very much material for deciding whether an employee is a workman or not. What is required to be seen is if the main and principal duties carried out by official are clerical or supervisory,. administrative and managerial in character. Ifthe main work done is of clerical nature , the mere fact that some supervisory duties were also carried out incidentally, the same will not covert the employment from that of a clerk into one in supervisory capacity.

29. There are few important points for consideration and determination in this case . The most important point for consideration in this case is if Ms. Manju Saxena, claimant, is a 'workman' or not . The jurisdiction of this Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court could be invoked only if Ms. Manju Saxena happens to a workman.

30. It is an admitted position that Ms. Manju Saxena joined the services of the respondent bank on 10-3-1986 as aLady Confidential Secretary . Later on she was promoted as Senior Confidential Secretary. Ms. Manju Saxena executed an agreement with the terms and conditions of service on 27-12-1986 EX MW 1/3. The duties entrusted to her post were primarily to assist the attached officer in the performance of that officer's functions . On 01-10-2004 Ms. Manju Saxena was placed in the category of Senior Confidential Secretary, SO Band 2. Thus , with effect from 01-10-2004 she was changed to new terms and conditions and to a new broad-banded structure so defined by the management in the following manner: -

32. Inher evidence , Ms. Manju Saxena has asserted that she was all along been discharging duties mainly of a clerical nature and even after she was transferred to new terms and conditions , there was no change in her duties . She was not given even incidentally any supervisory duties and she has not discharged any managerial or supervisory functions .Her real and substantial employment was clerical . In, her cross- examination Ms. Manju Saxena was enquired by the Ld. Counsel for the management ifshe was assigned thejob oforganizing events, liaisoning with bank managers , negotiating rates, finalizing the menu and the invitation list and she was also authorized to settle bills , etc. Further, if onbehalf of the bank she used to conduct branch visits both in Delhi and outside and she used to assist and recommendtothe bank the training needs of the employees and to such like questions, Ms. Manju Saxena answered that shewas working under the instructions ofMs. Nancy Dickinson and had no supervisory powers to take any action on behalf the bank. Further , no staff was reporting to her andno financial powers were assigned to her by the bank. Her main work was to type the reports under the instructions ofher immediate boss who used to take action onareas of improvement and finally allocating the budget "Broad-banding will allow us to have flexible pay structure aligned to the market, enabling us to attract, developandmotivate the very best employees . In addition,

228762/09-23 3934

THE GAZETTE OF DIDIA MULYA4B009/ASADHA 134931

[ [RARETIS SHC ( i)) ] gational branchescof thelareinegarding herowisits she has replied that she was given additional rompensibilities by Teher istiintediate, pass) Miss Dianty Dótkinsouro koleict weepertswithout any supervisery powers whithas alsosketar dfromdocuments BXW5q6lind002.Acording toMiseManju Saxenaj instblickinservused toożali horsat hes residenceand give i instructions , which is Palsovobar esfront document WOW9qMsb Manjre Saxionalhas asserted that she performed the dutiesmalt ihddpidriekiasthyobutler the instructions afgeslimmediatelbiobs, ardoi tốt bozivei otbeesia ed of sunitnos lliw adoj baziver bas won STU

dad Inthe caseedfAnantaBazm Pattiles (P) Endisis . Watermet (197003800248hit has been held that the question whether a pason is ampogiad ir abipervisory capacity or on clerical work depends upon whether the thai la preparadies adfred Burbyain are those of a baititas 106 Supervisory Charter, of < ife pervoir the aly coming supervisory Wank Bai incidentally Up for ordue fine, anotabekameneawon it Traction of the time would to be Belt that he is employeur in advisory of lugarzio and gu hare now note on Balerdibastab unfes workdone by him will not covert his employment terk

Delhi Admn & Ors (1983 ) 489 Ferguson So YePrasidiesOff992) can also 202 INBOUT US TO awyd sonsbive ten belit ad ex

Minji Saxena, ruderal donaran Suction 2 stof Pagoda Hiket 14 benimexs

yadt br case is whether than ofte om HSBC, in terminating theing the services of Ms. Manju Saxena hel fullterminal Abi adi bisedoals de ou to take up additional duties by her immediate boss , Ms. Nanoy Dictinsobotné bannel byoncosuredhof.hwagination, icoblokamean that she had stopped perlarking her hashki und essential citiesaifhope in hothing to show that the blink bpaielainly additional retrathersttieqnte Ms. VinjuSакона фот perforazing duties akisigned to herbysther bong MaiNuany 1Diokinborb It thay furtherbeketed here that the respondent bank could not file even a scrap of paper to comblish that Ms. Manju Saxena was assigned managerial , supervisory wamistrave antiesta oficer is a dignified Besignation but the nature or des Berformed the Pomal cannot be ascertained fom the meae use fr Saxena was employed to work ina prove that Mey Manji yalanrwis undyearwah ha managers supervisory Capacity 8 number of persons were working under Nie. Maja S 级 jupe ny erdifling file Hatis alid hidefons of an employe her Ms.Manju Saxena is not atque ni это облі

pecugra JUST2067092911 Бэлэгга казеннên thất in Ithất in 1985) 3 Scc 371 that the nature ofthe

is to be ascertained from Re Cominantit naturenature ofof dutiesadhesiveperformed by him, and not by

menclature .

tae yna vilstaabioni novo novig ton aswad

cobie odt decal puntoshboneka viafundur sollt by noiteas itselfwill show that full terminal benefitsschodnie bech given to Ms. Manju Saxona at the time of terminating her on of service iging inshoam 120m, tinglevatataks of the' extilaca categories the ma 1200 ) g to her the severa ગાડવા માગતા ચ DTONIzoq DIMINDS BM EM Babnomothneskage has not been whores ofthe plainant master of the banhand the 42GGISTSIN Enortenor should have been 190 horisodomie bon bon deandeban boondogoje formatore saresiathe momamos unkanhalf the waegdens bank was foretrench Pin Savers Unis subire benefits payable to her should have been calmubtel amor 19.and payment should have been made to her along with cutyislamint anden . Au tive Hanikiwagibbdohado

mmigratent build in this case, the retubachilenoviky rozivanother case, flaka Regionirco. Op s . Undeados. Правовоей нега на for banning the question is to whether aperson empтозатиranthamstrywawa katika barinadum adsurucada has iparonipley be the dashite dritte mbieridia SIDSROM,AMUL1994 Is as iswhat are the praninaganates thesehasmenobit saiagarpase, nedosadyna plond adivindad no esine superbinca Trang anugebrane stehow More and mot wahid adt animeethalit basmenνοιατί 10 26916 по 3935९ ६

нт

[ (8)9 ]

भारत की सजा? सुलाई , 2065/

It is noklivedispute inthis casesthitis. klanjur Sikxgnivκάδο an excellent workerende hairendere unblemishe service toto the bank which bar beradmitted by the respondent,bank . EVISCI

"In the very necce anthingsithore cannot be a strait- jacket formulafor awarding reliefof back wages .All realons will hiter the berdiet More establish the circumstances necessitating necessitating departuren At that stage the Tribunal will exercise its discretion

Weeping view line relevant Elfculinstances: B [ ( diftient be exercised in a judicial and cious manner.The reason for exercisingdiscretion must be cogent andand convincing andand must appear on the fac200shorodotte Wheinilisis said that something પ્રાણ

is to be done within the discretion ofthe authority,

erit to

that something is to be done ascording inth

โธปกร

but legal and re

Anst bas farthes hogarhaldsitt neewted stuqei sitaubal mof? Another selevant and extremelroupertentraling abhis needs tobereferreditoan this keyst. 2In1998 Lab IC 1545, it has been held by the Hon'ble Apex Gout that an employee on whom permanent status has been conferred caffor the Worth or and compensation as provided in the mainital Dispute Avi u nhi thư t 1999 bis 501-1-81 no sibaltonsa is bas isqogidisewagastada exil bosiq is betzoq bas niyanis en of tenuen The service ofito bas Authoritys within the meaning of Articles SARGOHEL banhs tegminated abruptly, and arbitrarily sithe roying him a month's or three meatbs' mati gai notwithstanding that there may he stipulation der to that effect sther on the contactinfarise A

Isıtmanndarky, baviarmer whose servitusssibah to illegally terminated would [( 1 -yagerexceptcoche extent he was gainfully employed during the enforced idleness . That is the normal rule . There would be a premium on the unwarranted litigatihdamy of the employer. Ifthe 25W Certified Standing pass it.260іті ? эпо 1991In atisther cusесла 1985 80 722 , it has beenthereof thaty in caderoll termimistiolt of sagaliceior permanenpit employee by giving three tientis notice or payvin liuans thare of would belladasoviciativoonide Constitution ás súdhi terms of contrast arencapable: มอ vicious discrimination and it shall be paked hiss,and fire

employertonigatoя милата заkrund the the workmen's demand for revision of wages, the terminationmmation may wellwed to unfair labour practice. In suenerinstanza Pamanhtrianly the formal rule, izobouidibed Movead witly full back wages . " rule.. to sent lis gained thematste nettina aid belit หมอ เา ง pretianather case reportedl igABR 1987 Sertllow that stermination of setrication a permanent employate barito giving him 90 days notice, or pay in lieu thereof, would loè 25 violative ofArticles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

ies have discussion and the settled legal position, it is evident that the action of the Chief Executive Officer , HSBC, in terminating the services ofMs. Manju Sarannya dalaning Availble giving had fall terfinal benefits die meintier just

១ Accordingtoworkmjd . Mithju Saxena, ever since her termination on doblend gilladent andso she is entitled to reinstatement with fillbustamos12 and continuity of senice with alligensвитый комодоя The management has not been able to sayohanseortionda of MamMani Sakana, that ever since the date of her termination she has remained unemployed. The workmanA therefore, has to be held entitled to reinstatensent with continuity ofservice.and full back wages togdiервом рат consequential benefits .

39. In the above concludedove concluded tasted scenario, the last point for consideration would be as to what benefits the workmen iwildelse entitled tarlandi fwhtridirections are this necessary indir oueri svods 110

asahi - isticbabove discussion and my findings. I holdthat the action of the Chief Exequtive Officer, HSBC,

in terminating the services of rockman,Ms. Moi Sake Maciu Saxena, with effect from 1-10-200510-2005 without giving her fate A nal benefits is neither just and legal nor valid . Workman, Ms: Manju Saxena is title,Cititled to reinside 1910serva Comayin service along with full back wages and also with all consequentiónefits . therefor

ni Theodolite naisida balataggomme -duz 19 (6) zule yd betnstmosaswop of to estsxs Datent1st June,01 2009. to (A) noitosa-dua bas ( 1 ) noite ATINAN SINGH, PresidingOffficoobal 40mHindkastanThe Pvt . Ladoeppellant serta Theon Employees of d/s Hindistan TiM/s Hindustan Tin Works veland, Othaerg (1979) 2/ Suprime Court Quady 80, tikarbonitr001-01-81 ns-b92280 ti amit me as on 26Services Reinstater sezimalo to retion in awarding full or partial backwage the termination ofservice is heldheld bad, paymentof fullwages proper Burdenof showing financiskidtiqnietty onthe employert Eliptojord should adrobe waiting sorskértnogtel in such aoegrizoqrib olid t๐ ม๐ว dgi eld noH 3936

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ASADHA 13 , 1931

[PART II -Sac. 3 ( ii) ] नई दिल्ली , 9 जून , 2009

following dispute for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 12012/ 153/91 - IR(B-III) dated 28-08-1991 .

"Whether the action ofthe RegionalManager, State BankofIndia, Bhubaneswar in dismissing Shri Satya Narayan Dora, C.C.T- from service with effect from 17-2-1990 is legal and justified ? If not, towhat relief the workman is entitled to ?"

का.आ. 1869. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक व्यधिकरण, भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 91/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-6-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-12012/ 153/91-आईआर ( बी. - 1 ) ]

अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 9th June , 2009

S.O. 1869.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industríal Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the award (Ref. No.91/2001 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of State Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 9-06-2009.

[No. L- 12012/153/91 -IR(B- 1 )] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR

2. Inhis claim statement the 2nd Party-Workman contends that hejoined as a Clerk-cum -Typist in the State Bank ofIndia on 18-1-1979 and thereafter he was transferred and posted at placed like Nabarangpur , Sakhigopal and at Puri .At Puri hejoined in the Temple Road Evening Branch ofthe State Bank of India on 18-10-1983 . While serving therehewas placed under suspension on the advise ofthe C.B.I. , Bhubaneswar in relation to a case involving fraud of bank's money. The Regional Manager , State Bank of India, Bhubaneswar framed necessary charges against the 2nd Party-Workomen on the allegation that he had committed the said fraud in corrupt collusion with one Shri Rajkishore Barik, theMessenger ofthe Bank, by fabricating the "Mail Transfier" issued from Calcutta Branch and for transferring the amount to a fictitious account opened in the name of one Shri M. K. Das . In the above enquiry the workman was found guilty and he was dismissed from service with effect from 17-2-1990. It is alleged by the disputant that the above enquiry was not conducted fairly in as much as he was not provided sufficient opportunity to defend himself and as such the action ofthe Management is liable to be set aside.

Present : N. K. R.Mohapatra, Presiding Officer

Tr. Industrial Dispute Case No. 91/2001 Date ofPassing Award - 21st April 2009

BETWEEN

3. The 1stParty-Management ofState Bank of India filedhiswritten statement denying all the averments ofthe workman. Depending upon the above stand and various other stands ofthe parties the Tribunal framed three issues asfollows.

ISSUES

RegionalOffice, Near Capital Thana, Unit - I

The Management of the Regional Manager , StateBank of India, (Region- 1) Bhubaneswar. (Orissa)

... Ist Party-Management .

Isthedomestic enquiry conducted against the workman fair and proper ?

AND

TheirWorkmen

Is the action of the Regional Manager, State Bank ofIndia, Bhubaneswar in dismissing the workman from service with efect from 17-2-1990 legal andjustified?

Shri S. N. Dora, Ex . C.C.T. , C/o . Kamala Kanta Panta, Plot No. 152, Chintamaniswar , Orissa , Bhubaneswar .

3. To what relief, the workman is entitled to ?

...2nd Party-Workman.

APEARANCES

M/s . Jagannath Pattnaik For the 1st Party-

Advocate .

Management .

Shri S. N. Dora : ForHimselfthe

2ndParty-Workman.

AWARD

4. Of the above issues, the Tribunal took up Issue No. 1 relating tothe propriety of the Domestic Enquiry as preliminary issue and came to held in its order dated 18-10-1997that the enquiry conducted against the workman was not fare and proper. At the same time it passed an order permitting the Management to examine additional witnesses, ifhe so shooses , justifying its order ofdismissal passed against the workraan.

5. Against the aforesaid order of the Tribunal the 1stParty-Management preferred O.J.C. 16529/97 beforethe Hon'ble High Court of Orissa. While disposing of the The Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- Section ( 1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) have referred the 09939 १६९ भारत कामराज जुलाई 2009/अवादा HOSTESAD AHT

[ ( 2- ) ]

thanawandsblessenitritedthe GeimimmeriteIndias Ministry ofLabours & Employment onseper cutest , toritatemu bisa salt mort inebiva zi îl HARIR TURSKN, PresidingOfficer -on in to viedtbetste GAAT berupST1981ed bras 0901 rianie ako naisil धक विवाद अधिनियम, 1949 1947 अरण यसरी एवं गैस dgni osi ध एत्व में 3000 2089/1998 +आईबारां सी ] अभीजी अक्क अडिसन संत्रा नियोजको और कोयले के अनियि औद्योगिक विवादमें कोद्रीय begumes star shaandengaged icode barsta asd H M A-Mbas S-Midirixel min ofof revignovia as26w thenominiogge on 160 2999 प्राप्त हुआ था fot qqa fon zaw li salt worde word onsive nemo डेस्क अधिकारी namhow ston esos milagret 11 Host ni berowane w Delhi, the 9th June, 2009

bisws suQigh vibeeAnipsuranceMofosSiqtjomdi if the Andustrial Dispips - Acat, 1967164sf1946)xshe Lostrial Government hereby FOR/ JA / of Central Goyerguient Industrial Fribunal - Court Labelrutas shown in the Angurein the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation tothemanagement ofGas Authority ofIndia Ltd. and their win Qanibunich War AldeWay and Cefal Government on2-6-2009 . paliliskies /thai @ward (RefkyEGT/

[F.No. L-30012/57/1998- IR (C -I) ]

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT , JABALPUR

NO . CGIT/LC/R/ 143/99

Presiding Officer: Shri Mohd . Shakir Hasan

Shri Nago Singh ,

гі 11.000 1.20 169ίτε το ποπιγέα του τούτο δε πο nobesherthalaim of Nago Singh that he is workman noty of India,Lid cand,not contract 26 bomlaboutis arcantable ? Ifysm then, is the termination 26 99fbis servishy the management singa 7061527 Jegal moris and edition then what reliefhe is entitled,? " Tovan od brThoantoqfjthenapplicantdhmosbhorts is that the applicantis aisosident of Chikli ,Behanida,Distta Ujjainand his land was acquirethan-nha- 41940forowonmapplicant organisation and he became jobless . Thereafter the applicant offered the non-applicant to work as a cleaner on payment of Rs . 1250 per month as on monthly pay. The non-applicant accepted the offer and the applicant started working there since 2551 1995. The applicant did work желатинтусом тоннabpastianbao1996. mitme meantime , happan gozompensaton amonatuot the acquired nanabataeae wastewatcndnly to the market valide . Assina hafi veretnek Ve ford the Lodinnéda deitional DisdierJedge vijana Desert of referencel case,the Wolfappleantdinofa sudded ossibi serminatedthe dorite oftheapplicate off64-29990 Theinrichande dardag of празбиометорирplienheidfused to pay the said direars . Lastly the applicant filodu CaseNo way powbeforethe Dabota Court Dijjain ! FRULCaragdebοτα Courtisan balwandlore Balzo Hand dissant simplemented aho01 butthe non-applicant did not re -employ the applicant . It is stated that the applicant had worked under the supervision ofthe officer ofnon -applicant organisation of Gas Authority ofIndia Ltd., Navakheda, Ujjain from 25-3-95 to 6-1-97 and he got monthly pay thereof . The service of the applicant is said to have been terminated against the provision of Sec-25 ( 1 ) ( f) of the Industrial Dispute Act as he had continuously worked for 22 months . It is stated that the applicant is entitled for regularisation. It is stated that the applicant and the non- applicant had a relation of employee and employer. On these grounds, it is submitted that an award be passed in favour of the applicant and he be reinstated in the service and the back wages with interest bepaid.

S/o Jujhar Singh Chauhan,

VillageChikli,

Post Nanded, Teh. Tarana ,

Workman/Union

Distt. Ujjain (MP)

Versus

TheGeneral Manager,

GasAuthority of India Ltd. ,

GailComplex

POVijaypur,

Distt. Guna(MP)

.....Management

AWARD

Passed on this 25th day of May, 2009

3. The non-applicant also appeared and contested the case by filing written Statement. The case of the non- applicant, interalia is that the applicant was a contractor for cleaning the premises . It is stated that he gave an application on 25-3-95 and offered to clean the Chikli Khera office for Rs . 1250 per month . Accordingly work order was passed on 10-4-95 by the then Incharge Shri R.S. Ranadey for one year . It is stated that on expiry of one year i.e. 31-6-06, his service was automatically terminated. It is stated that the applicant again filed an application on 31-3-96 and again he offered to work of cleaning in the said premises. It isstated that again on his offer, a work order was passed on9-4-96 till 31-3-97 on a monthly payment of Rs . 1250 and 22019when in Deca 1996, thearmas pormscessity, then his service termihaned quis admitted that the applicant filed for 1. The Government ofIndia, Adinistry ofdeaborn vide its Notification No. L- 30042/ 57/98IR (@deliowas 3940

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JULY 4, 2009/ ASADHA 13 , 1931

[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii) ] back payment before the Labour Court, Ujjain and a case No. 7/97 was registered. On 23-2-01 , the Learned Labour Courtpassed order for payment of arrear of Rs . 1500. It is stated that there was no post of peon in the office in the year 1995 and 1996 and he was never appointed on the post of peon and the applicant had only worked as contractor in the Gas Authority of India Ltd. and there was no relationship of employer and employee between them. There is a prescribed rules for appointment and he never worked as an employee . On these grounds the award be passed in favour of the non - applicant.

4. On perusal of the record , it appears that subsequently the applicant did not appear in the case and the case proceeded exparte against him on 19-1-06 .

which is marked as Exhibit M-2 . The work order shows that itwas simply a contract for one year on certain conditions . It is evident from the said documents that there was no relationship of employer and employee. He has further stated that the service of Nago Singh was taken till Nov.- 1996 and thereafter his service was no longer required. The management has filed another application of Nago Singh Chauhan which is also marked as Exhibit M-3 . This application shows that he again requested for work contract on31-3-06 and the work order was given vide ExhibitM-4. The construction of both the documents show that there wasoffer on behalf ofNago Singh and the same was accepted bytheManager ofKhera Compressor Office . He has stated that no appointment was given to him . Exhibit M -2 and M-4 show that it was not appointment letter rather work orders were given on proposal by the applicant Nago Singh Chauhan . Thus the oral and documentary evidence show thatthe applicant Nago Singh Chauhan was not a workman .

6. Inthe result, the reference is answered in favour ofthe non-applicant Management. Accordingly the award is passed exparte in favour of the non -applicant and against the applicant Nago Singh Chauhan.

7. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry ofLabour & employment as perrules.

5. In order to prove the case , the non- applicant management has adduced oral and documentary evidence. MW- 1 S.S. Pangti was Deputy Manager in the said office from 1995 to 1997. He has stated that Nago Singh Chauhan gave an application on 25-3-95 for his service as a contractor for Rs . 1250 per month . The said application is marked as Exhibit M- 1 . The said application clearly shows that the applicant offer himself to do the work of cleaning on a monthly rate ofRs . 1250 and had requested for work order . He has stated that after considering his application , he was informed on 10-4-95 on his quotation for work on a monthly rate of Rs . 1250. The said work order is also filed

MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN, PresidingOfficer

15 Printedby the Manager, Govt. of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi -110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054.