This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

REGD. NO . D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003-05 रजिस्ट्री सं० डी० एल० ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

सत्यमेन जयते

भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

नई दिल्ली, अगस्त 30 सितम्बर 5 , 2009 , शनिवार/ भाद्र ४ भाद्र 14 , 1931

सं. 36 ]

NEW DELHI, AUGUST 30- SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009 , SATURDAY/BHADRA 8-BHADRA 14 , 1931 No. 36]

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II- खण्ड 3 -उप-खण्ड ( ii) PART II Section 3-Sub- section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

कार्मिक , लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय

( कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग )

अधीन उससे संबंधित अन्य मामलों अथवा आनुषंगिक मामलों के संचालन के लिए केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो के विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2009

अनुसूची

डीसीबी

पुलिस स्टेशन और

क्रम स्थान

अपराध संख्या

संख्या

अपराध संख्या

70/93

एम.आर.ए, मार्ग , 129/93

स्टॉक एक्सचेंज

73/93

पैडोहईन , 195/93

कथा बाजार

118/93

दादर , 186/93

सेना भवन

117/93

दादर , 187/93

सेंचूरी बाजार

110/93

महिम कौसवे महिम , 185/93

71/93

6. एयर इंडिया कूफे पराडे , 126/93

75/93

एल.टी.मार्ग , 122/93

जावेरी बाजार

(एक्सप्लोरिड

का.आ. 2385.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा आंतकवादी और विध्वंसकारी क्रियाकलाप ( निवारण ) अधिनियम, 1987 ( 1987 का अधिनियम सं. 28 ) की धारा 13 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए श्री एच. के. शुक्ला और श्री एजाज सलीम खान वरिष्ठ लोक अभियोजक अधिकारी , केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो , मुम्बई को, संलग्न अनुसूची में उल्लिखित अपराधों अथवा मुंबई शहर और मुंबई उपनगरीय जिलों , रायगढ़ और जिला ठाणे , में किए गए ऐसे ही मामलों के विचारण तथा उक्त बम अधिनियम की धारा 9 के अंतर्गत गठित नामनिर्दिष्ट न्यायालय , मुंबई में पूर्वोक्त अनुसूची में उल्लिखित मामलों और मुंबई शहर तथा उसके उपनगरों में 12 मार्च , 1993 को हुए बम विस्फोटों से उद्भूत ऐसे ही क्षेत्रों में ऐसे ही मामलों से उत्पन्न भामला संख्या आरसी 1 ( एस )/ 93 - सीबीआई एसटीएफ मुंबई ( कोर्ट केस सं. बीबीसी 1 ऑफ 93 , बीबीसी 1 - ए ऑफ 93 , बीबीसी 1 - बी ऑफ 93 , और बीबीसी 2 ऑफ 2008 ) तथा उक्त अधिनियम के

स्कूटर)

(5065)

3056 GI/2009 5066

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5, 2009/BHADRA 14 , 1931

1 2 3 4 8. सी रॉक होटल बांद्रा , 48/93 114/93 9. प्लाजा सिनेमा महिम, 184/93 109/93 10. जुहू सेंटूर होटल सांताक्रूज , 155/93 116/93 11 . एयर पोर्ट बे 54 सहारा 200/93 108/93 (थ्रोइंग एच.जी)

एयरपोर्ट , 19/93 115/93 12. सेंटूर होटल (एयरपोर्ट)

13. वर्ली वर्ली , एलएसी 389/93 112/93 14.

72/93 नैगम सी.आर.एस. रोड मतुंगा , 251/93 (अन एक्सप्लोडिड स्कूटर)

111/93 धनजी स्ट्रीट एंड एल.टी. मार्ग , 124/93

15. जावेरी बाजार (2अन एक्सप्लोडिड स्कूटर)

16. महास्ला महास्ला, 6/93 132/93 17. श्रीवर्धन श्री वर्धन , 14/93 133/93 18. गोरेगांव गोरेगांव , 17/93 134/93 19. ठाणे कपूरबावड़ी, 14/93 135/93 20. एस.के. मेनन स्ट्रीट एल.टी. मार्ग , 133/93 77/93

15/93 21 . इर्स्टन साइड लैवोटरी एलएसी , ऑफ मुसाफिर खाना मुंबई

18/93 22. नरिया वाडी मुस्लिम एलएसी सिमेंट्री, मझगांव

20/93 23. पिकनिक गेस्ट हाउस नियर लीडो थियेटर , सांता क्रूज ( वेस्ट)

21/93 24. 58 , नर्गिस दत्त रोड , एलएसी पाली हिल बांद्रा

23/93 25. बोनापार्ट इंडस्ट्रीज एलएसी घनश्याम इंडस्ट्रीज , ईस्टवीरा देलाई रोड, मुंबई-50

32/93 26. खातीजाबी चॉल , एलएसी कुर्ला लेन , कुर्ला (वेस्ट) आर नं. । , सोनापुर एलएसी 707/93

22/93 27. ड्रीमलैंड को.ओ . एलएसी हाउसिंगसोसायटी, मिल्ट्रीरोड-मेरोल, मुंबई

[सं. 225/12/2009 - एवीडी-11 ] चंद्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL , PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training ) New Delhi , the 28th August , 2009

S.O. 2385. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- Section ( 1 ) of Section 13 ofthe Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention ) Act , 1987 , (Act No. 28 of 1987 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints Shri H.K. Shukla and Shri Ejaz Salim Khan, Senior Public Prosecutor of the Central Bureau of Investigation , as Special Public Prosecutor of the Central Bureau of Investigation for conducting prosecution of the case RC . 1 ( S )/93 - CBI STF Mumbai ( Court case No. BBC 1 of 93 , BBC IA/ 93 , BBC IB/ 93 , and BBC 2 / 2008) relating to the cases mentioned in the Schedule appended hereto, and such cases in such areas as may arise out of and connected with Bomb Blasts which occurred on 12th March , 1993 at Mumbai City and suburbs, and other matters connected therewith or incidental thereto under the said Act, in the Designated Court at Mumbai constituted u/s 9 of the said Act to try offences or such cases committed at Mumbai City and Mumbai Suburban Districts , Raigad District and Thane District as inentioned in the case schedule , and to try such cases in such areas as may arise out of and connected with aforesaid Bomb Blasts .

SCHEDULE

Sl . Place No.

Police Station and Cr. No.

DCB Cr . No. 2

4 1

70/93

M.R.A. Marg , 129/93 1. Stock Exchange

2. Katha Bazar

Pydhonie , 195/93 73/93 3. Sena Bhavan Dadar, 186/93 118/93 4. Century Bazar Dadar , 187/93 117/93 5. Mahim Causeway Mahim, 185/93 110/93 6. Air- India

Cuffe Parade . 126/93 71/93 7. Zaveri Bazar LT Marg, 122/93 75/93 (Exploded Scooter )

8. Sea Rock Hotel

Bandra , 148/93 114/93 9. Plaza Cinema Mahim, 184/93 109/93 10. Juhu Centaur Hotel Santa Cruz, 155/93 116/93

Sahar. 200/93

108/93 11. Airport Bay 54 (ThrowingH.G.)

115/93 12. Centaur Hotel (Airport) Airport , 19/93

13. Worli

Worli . LAC 389/93 112/93

72.93

Matunga. 251/93

14. Naigaum C.R.S. Rd (unexpl . Scooter ) 5067 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009 /भाद्र 14, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

आयुक्तालय- II, आई पी एस्टेट, नई दिल्ली -110109 प्रतिस्थापित किया जाए ।

111/93

L.T. Marg , 124/93

[फा. सं. 11012/ 1/2008 - हिंदी -2 ] मधु शर्मा , निदेशक ( राजभाषा ) 15. Dhanji ST & Zaveri Bazar (2unexploded Scooters)

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

132/93

16. Mhasla

Mhasla, 6/93

(Department of Revenue)

133/93

17. Srivardhan Srivardhan , 14/93

CORRIGENDUM

18. Goregaon Goregaon , 17/93 134/93

New Delhi , the 18th August, 2009

19. Thane

Kapurbawdi , 14/93 135/93

77/93

20. S.K. Menon Street L.T. Marg , 138/93

15/93

LAC

21. Estern side Lavotry ofMusafir Khana , Mumbai

18/93

22. Nariyal Wadi Musim LAC CementaryMazagaon

S.O. 2386. In the notification published on 27th April , 2009 in Gazette of India in Part 2 Sub- section-(ii ) Section -3 the office of Department of Revenue notification under Sub rule 4 of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use ofOfficial Purpose of the Union ) Rules 1976 , the office of the Central Excise Commissionairate - 11 , IP Estate , New Delhi - 110109 may please be substituted in place of office of the Central Excise Commissionairate , IP Estate , New Delhi - 110001 .

20/93

[F. No. 11012/ 1 /2008-Hindi -2 ] MADHU SHARMA, Director ( OL) 23. Picnic Guest House LAC Near Lido Theatre , Santa Cruz(W)

कार्यालय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त

21/93

उदयपुर , 19 अगस्त, 2009

24. 58 , Nargis Dutt Road, LAC Pali Hill Bandra ( W) , Mumbai-50

सं. 11/2009-10

LAC

21/93

(आयकर)

25. Bone Parte Ind . , Ghansham Ind . Est. Vira Desai Road Mumbai -50

32/93

26. Khatijabi Chawl , LAC Kurla LAC 707/93 R. No. J , Sonapur Lane, Kurla( W)

22/93

LAC

का.आ. 2387. आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 की 43वां) की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 ग ) के उपखण्ड ( iv ) के साथ पठित आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 2 ग के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों काप्रयोग करते हुए मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, उदयपुर एतद्वारा " सोशल वर्क एण्ड रिसर्च सेन्टर , तिलोनिया , अजमेर ( राजस्थान ) " को कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2009-10 से 2011-12 तक के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखण्ड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करते हैं, अर्थात :-

27. Dreamland Co. Op . Hog. Sct. Military Road , Marol , Mumbai

[No. 225 / 12/2009 -AVD- II ]

CHANDRA PRAKASH , Under Secy .

वित्त मंत्रालय

(i ) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

(राजस्व विभाग)

शुद्धिपत्र

नई दिल्ली, 18 अगस्त, 2009

(ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा ।। की उपधारा (v ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा भिन्न तरीकों से अपनी निधि ( जेवर , जवाहरात , फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नही करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीकरेगा;

का.आ. 2386. भारत के राजपत्र के भाग II , खंड-3 , उपखंड ( ii ) में दिनांक 27 अप्रैल , 2009 को प्रकाशित अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत केन्द्रीय सरकार राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के प्रयोग) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम 4 के तहत अधिसूचित राजस्व विभाग के केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क आयुक्तालय , आई पी एस्टेट , नई दिल्ली -110001 कार्यालय के स्थान पर केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के सम्बन्ध में लागू नहीं होगी जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की 5068

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 5, 2009/ BHADRA 14 , 1931

[PART II--SEC . 3 (ii ) ] प्राप्ति के प्रासंगिक नहीं हो अथवा ऐसे कारोबार के सम्बन्ध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नही रखी जाती हों;

(v) That in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organization with similar objectives .

( iv) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;

Thisnotification is aplicable onlyto the recipients of income on behalf of the assesee and not to any other receipt or income of such recipients . Taxability or, otherwise of the income of the assessee would be separately considered asper the provisions of the Income- tax Act, 1961 .

(v) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियां और परिसम्पतियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जायेंगी;

[No. CCIT/UDR/ ITO ( Tech . )/ 2009-10/1164] MUKESH BHANTI , Chief Commissioner of Income - Tax

केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क आयुक्त का कार्यालय

कोलकाता , 21 अगस्त, 2009 सं. 01/2009-सीमा शुल्क ( एन.टी. ) यह अधिसूचना केवल संस्था की ओर से आय के प्राप्तकर्ता पर ही लागू होगी न कि इस तरह के प्राप्तकर्ता द्वारा किसी अन्य प्राप्ति अथवा आय पर । संस्था के आय की कराधेयता अथवा अन्यथा पर, आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 के उपबन्धों के अनुसार पृथक रूप से विचार किया जायेगा ।

[सं. मु.आ.आ./उदय/ आ.अ. ( तक.) / 2009-10/1164] मुकेश भान्ती, मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Udaipur, the 19th August, 2009

No. 11 /2009-10 (INCOME-TAX)

का.आ. 2388, सीमा शुल्क, अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 52 ) के साथ पठित एम.एफ.डी. आर. सर्कुलर सं. 31 /2003 -सीमा शुल्क, दिनांक 07 अप्रैल, 2003 की धारा 152 के अधीन दिनांक 1 जुलाई, 1994 को जारी अधिसूचना सं. 33 / 1994- सीमा शुल्क (एन.टी. ) द्वारा प्रत्यायोजित सीमा शुल्क , अधिनियम, 1962 की धारा 9 में प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , विकास आयुक्त, फॉलता विशेष आर्थिक क्षेत्र, वाणिज्य मंत्रालय के पत्र सं. 2 ( 1 ) N -5 /2002/6002 दिनांक 3-3-2009 द्वारा अनुमोदित मैसर्स अनमोल टेक्सटाईल्स JL-2 , धुलागोरी इंडस्ट्रीयल पार्क , मौत्रा- जला धुलागोरी , पी.एस. संकरैल , पो. आ. धुलागोरी , जिला- हावडा-711302, पश्चिम बंगाल को शतप्रतिशत निर्यातांन्मुख इकाई ( 100% E.D.U. ) की स्थापना के उद्देश्य से सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 52) की धारा-9 के अधीन एतद्वारा वेयर हाऊसिंग स्टेशन (Warehousing Station ) घोषित किया जाता है ।

S.O. 2387.- In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub-Section ( iv ) of Clause (23C ) of Section 10 of the Income -tax Act, 1961 ( 43 of 1961 ) , read with rule 2C ofthe Income-tax Rules , 1962 , I , Chief Commissioner of Income- tax, Udaipur hereby notify the " Social Work & Research Centre, Tilonia , Ajmer ( Rajasthan ) " for the purpose of the said sub - clause for the assessment years 2009-10 to 2011-12 subject to the following conditions , namely :-

[सी. सं. 1V ( 16) 7/के.उ.शु./तक. /हल/डब्ल्यू.ए. आर/09 / 15890-15904 ] जय प्रकाश , आयुक्त ( i) The assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established;

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

Kolkata, the 21st August , 2009 No. 01 /2009 -CUSTOMS ( NT)

( ii) The assessee will not invest or deposit its fund ( other than voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, fumiture etc.) for any period during the previous year relevant to the assessment years mentioned above otherwise than in any one or more ofthe forms or modes specified in sub- section (5) of section 11 ;

(iii) This notification will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gains ofbusiness , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee sind separate books of account are maintained in respect of such business;

( iv) The assessee will regularly file its retum of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with the provisions ofthe Income- tax Act , 1961;

S.O. 2388.- In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 9 of the Customs Act , 1962 as delegated by Notification No. 33 / 1994 - Customs (NT) dated 1st July , 1994 issued under Section 152 of the Customs Act , 1962 ( 52 of 1962) readwith MFDR Circular No. 31 /2003 - Customs ,dated 7thApril , 2003 the factory premises of M / s Anmol Textiles . JL-2 , Dhulagori Industial Park, Mouza- Jała Dhulagori , P.S. Sankrail , P.O. Dhulagori , Dist. - Howarh - 711302 . West Bangal are , hereby , declared to be a Warehousing Station under Section 9 of the Customs Act , 1962 ( 52 of 1962) for the purpose of setting up of a 100 % Export Oriented Unit , as approvedby the Development [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/भाद्र 14, 1931

5069

(Department of Financial Services ) New Delhi , the 25th August , 2009 Commissioner, Falta Special Economic Zone. Ministry of Commerce, Government of India vide their letter No. 2 ( 1 )/ N-5/2002/6002 datd 30th March, 2009 .

[ C.No. IV( 16) 7/CE/Tech/ Hal/WAR/ 09/ 15890-15904 ]

JAI PRAKASH , Commissioner

कार्यालय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त

शुद्धि-पत्र

जयपुर , 24 अगस्त, 2009

S.O. 2390. -In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 ( 1 ) of the Banking Regulation Act , 1949 ( 10 of 1949) , the Central Government, on the recommendations of Reserve Bank of India , hereby declares that the provisions of Section 10( 1 ) ( c ) ( i ) of the said Act shall not apply to the Federal Bank Ltd. in sofar as they relate to its Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer Shri M. Venugopalan taking up Directorship on the Board of United Stock Exchange of India Ltd. till the period he continues to be Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer of the Bank oruntill further orders , whichever is earlier .

[F. No. 7/69/2009 - BOA]

D. D. MAHESHWARI , Under Secy.

का.आ. 2389. आयकर , अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 सी ) के उपखण्ड ( vi ) के तहत् अधिसूचना सं. 07/2009-10 दिनांक 30-07-2009 के द्वारा " दिगांतर शिक्षा एवम् खेल कूद समिति, गाँव-टोडी रामजानीपुरा , जगतपुरा , जयपुर " को स्वीकृति दी गई थी । अधिसूचना के पैरा 1 की लाईन 4 में " दिगांतर " के स्थान पर " दिगंतर " पढ़ा जाये ।

नई दिल्ली , 26 अगस्त, 2009

[क्रमांक मुआआ/अआआ/( मु.) /जय/ 10(23 सी ) ( vi ) 2009-10/1955 ]

बी. एस. ढिल्लों , मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CORRIGENDUM

Jaipur, the 24th August , 2009

का.आ. 2391. राष्ट्रीय कृषि तथा ग्रामीण विकास बैंक अधिनियम , 1981 ( 1981 का 61 ) की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार, भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक के परामर्श से , एतद्वारा , डॉ. के.सी. चक्रवर्ती , उप गवर्नर , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक को अधिसूचना की तारीख से तथा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो , श्रीमती उषा थॉरोट के स्थान पर राष्ट्रीय कृषि तथा ग्रामीण विकास बैंक ( नाबार्ड ) के निदेशक मंडल में अंशकालिक निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. 7/2/2009-बीओ- [ ] जी.बी. सिंह , उप सचिव

New Delhi , the 26th August , 2009

S.O. 2389.-In Notification No. 07/ 2009-10 dated 30-07-2009 vide which " Diganter Shiksha Evam Khel Kood Samiti , Village- Todi Ramjanipura, Jagatpura , Jaipur" was approved for the purpose of sub - clause ( vi ) of clause (23C) ofSection 10 ofthe Incorne -tax Act , 1961 ( 43 of 1961 ) read with rule 2CA of the Income- tax Rules , 1962 in Para 1 , lines 3& 4 name of the samiti may be read as " Digantar Shiksha Evam Khel Kood Samiti " instead of " Digantar Shiksha Evam Khel Samiti "

[No. CCIT/JPR/Addl . CIT( Hqrs .)/ 10 ( 23C)

(vi)/ 2009-10/ 1955]

B. S. DHILLON , Chief Commissioner of Income -tax

(वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग )

नई दिल्ली , 25 अगस्त , 2009

S.O. 2391. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( c) of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Act . 1981 ( 61 of 1981 ) , the Central Government , in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India , hereby nominates Dr. K.C. Chakraborty, Deputy Governor , Reserve Bank of India as part-time director on the Board of Directors of National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development ( NABARD) , from the date of notification and until further orders . whichever is earlier , vice Smt . Usha Thorat .

[F. No. 7/2/2009 -BO- I ]

G.B. SINGH ,Dy . Secy

नई दिल्ली , 26 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2390.-बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम , 1949 ( 1949 का 10 ) की धारा 53 ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर , एतद्वारा , घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 10 ( 1 ) ( ग ) ( i ) के उपबंध उस सीमा तक फेडरल बैंक लि. पर लागू नहीं होंगे जहाँ तक उसका सम्बन्ध बैंक के प्रबंध निदेशक एवं मुख्य कार्यपालक अधिकारी श्री एम. वेणुगोपालन द्वारा , उनके बैंक में प्रबंध निदेशक एवं मुख्य कार्यपालक अधिकारी बने रहने तक , अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, युनाइटेड स्टॉक एक्सचेंज ऑफ इंडिया लि. के बोर्ड में, निदेशक का पद धारित करने से है ।

[फा. सं. 7/69/2009- बीओए] डी. डी. महेश्वरी , अवर सचिव

का.आ. 2392.-राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) योजना , 1970/1980 के खंड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) और खंड 8 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित , बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उपधारा 3 के खंड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शाक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात्, एतद्द्वारा , श्री जी.एस. वेदी ( जन्म तिथि 28-06-1950 ) , वर्तमान में कार्यपालक निदेशक, पंजाब एंड सिंध बैंक को उनके पदभार ग्रहण [PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009 /BHADRA 14 , 1931

5070

ofCommerce from the date of taking charge of the post and for a period upto 31-12-2010 i.e. the date of his superannuation or until further orders , whichever is earlier.

[F.No. 9/8/2009 -BO -1 ] करने के तारीख से और 30-6-2010 तक की अवधि के लिए , अर्थात उनकी अधिवर्षिता की तारीख तक , अथवा अंगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो , पंजाब एंड सिंध बैंक के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक के पद पर नियुक्ति करती है ।

G. B. SINGH ,Dy. Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 30 जुलाई, 2009

[फा. सं. 9/8/2009- बीओ -1 ] जी. बी. सिंह , उप सचिव

का.आ. 2394. वित्त मंत्रालय , आर्थिक कार्य विभाग की दिनांक 5 जून, 2009 की समसंख्यक अधिसूचना में आंशिक संशोधन करते हुए , एमआर प्रभाग से संबंधित मामलों के लिए सुश्री अपर्णा सिन्हा, उप निदेशक के स्थान पर श्री ए.के. सिंह , अवर सचिव (एफटी ) को केन्द्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी ( सीपीआईओ ) के रूप में नियुक्त किया जाता है ।

[एफ. सं. 1/1/2005- आरटीआई ] एस. कनकाम्बरन , अवर सचिव ( आरटीआई ) New Delhi , the 30th July, 2009

New Delhi , the 26th August , 2009 S.O. 2392. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( a ) of sub- section ( 3 ) of section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act . 1970/1980 read with sub- clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 and sub - clause ( 1 ) of clause 8 of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme, 1970/1980 , the Central Government , in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India , hereby appoints Shri G.S. Vedi (DoB 28-06-1950 ) presently Executive Director , Punjab & Sind Bank as Chairman & Managing Director , Punjab & Sind Bank from the date of taking charge of the post and for a period upto 30-6-2010 i.e. the date of his superannuation or until further orders , whichever is earlier.

S.O. 2394. In partial modification of Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs's notification of even number dated 5th June , 2009 , Mr. A.K. Singh Under Secretary ( FT ) is appointed as CPIO in place ofMs. Aparna Sinha, DeputyDirector for matters relating to MR Divison .

[F. No. 9 / 8 /2009 -BO- I ] G. B. SINGH , Dy. Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 27 अगस्त, 2009

[F. No. 1 / 1 /2005 - RT1 ] S. KANAKAMBARAN, Under Secy . ( RTI )

स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय (स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण विभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 17 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2395. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए और भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् केन्द्र सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:-

का.आ. 2393.- राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) योजना, 1970/1980 के खंड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) और खंड 8 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित , बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उपधारा 3 के खंड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात्, एतद्वारा , श्री टी.वाई. प्रभु ( जन्म तिथि 31-12-1950 ) , वर्तमान में कार्यपालक निदेशक, यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया को उनके पदभार ग्रहण करने के तारीख से और 31-12-2010 तक की अवधि के लिए. अर्थात उनकी अधिवर्षिता की तारीख तक, अथवा अगले आदेशों तक , जो भी पहले हो , ओरियंटल बैंक ऑफ कामर्स के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक के पद पर नियुक्ति करती है ।

2. श्री बांके बिहारी डेंटल कॉलेज एंड रिसर्च सेंटर , मसूरी , गाजियाबाद के संबंध में दंत चिकित्सा अर्हता को मान्यता देने के संबंध में दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम सं. 56 के सामने स्तम्भ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां जोड़ी जाएंगी , अर्थात्

[फा. सं. 9/8/2009- बीओ -1 ] जी. बी. सिंह, उप सचिव

New Delhi , the 27th August , 2009

IV. श्री बांके बिहारी डेंटल कॉलेज एंड रिसर्च सेंटर , मसूरी , गाजियाबाद

बीडीएस , पंडित चौधरी चरण सिंह विश्वविद्यालय , मेरठ

(i ) दंत शल्य चिकित्सा स्नातक ( यदि यह 27-12-2008 को अथवा उसके उपरांत प्रदान की गई हो । )

[फा. सं. - 12017/34/2003 - डी.ई. ] आर. शंकरन , अवर सचिव S.O. 2393. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( a ) of sub- section ( 3 ) of section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings ) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub-clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 and sub clause ( 1 ) of clause 8 of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme, 1970/1980 , the Central Government, in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India , hereby appoints Shri T. Y. Prabhu (DoB 31-12-1950 ) presently Executive Director , Union Bank of India as Chairman & Managing Director , Oreintal Bank [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (Department of Health and Family Welfare) New Delhi , the 17th August, 2009 S.O. 2395. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of1948 ) , the Central Government after consultation with Dental Council of India , hereby makes the following amendments in Part - I of the Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 56 , in part - I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) pertaining to recognition of dental qualification in respect of Shree Bankey Bihari Dental College & Research Centre , Masuri , Ghaziabad , the following entries shall be inserted thereunder :----

IV. Shee Bankey Bihari Dental College& Research Centre , Masuri , Ghaziabad.

(i) Bachelor of Dental Surgery

BDS , Pt . Ch. Charan Singh University , Meerut .

(Ifgranted on or after 27-12-2008 )

[F. No. V- 12017/34/2003 - D.E. ] R. SANKARAN , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 19 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2396.-दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए और भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् केन्द्र सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची के भाग -1 में एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्:-

2. बाबाफरीद स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , फरीदकोट ( पंजाब ) के संबंध में दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम सं. 53 के रु. स्तम्भ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में जेनेसिस दंत विज्ञान एवं अनुसंधान संस्थान , फिरोजपुर ( पंजाब ) के संबंध में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां जोड़ी जाएंगी , अर्थात्:-

XIV. जेनेसिस दंत विज्ञान एवं अनुसंधान संस्थान , फिरोजपुर (पंजाब)

(i ) दंत शल्य चिकित्सा स्नातक ( यदि यह 9-6-2009 को अथवा उसके उपरांत

बीडीएस , बाबा फरीद स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्व- विद्यालय , फरीदकोट (पंजाब)

प्रदान की गई हो । )

[फा. संख्या- वी 12017/25/2005 -डी.ई. ] आर. शंकरन , अवर सचिव

5071

भारत का राजपत्त्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

New Delhi , the 19th August, 2009

S.O. 2396.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) ofSection 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of1948) , the Central Government after consultation with Dental Council of India, hereby makes the following amendments in Part- I of the Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 53 , in part - I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) pertaining to Baba Farid University of Health Sciences , Faridkot ( Punjab) , the following entries inrespect ofGenesis Institute of Dental Sciences & Research Ferozpur (Punjab) shall be inserted thereunder:-

XIV. Genesis Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Ferozpur ( Punjab)

(i) Bachelor of Dental Surgery

BDS, Baba Farid University ofHealth Sciences ,

Faridkot (Punjab ) .

(If granted on or after 9-6-2009)

[ F. No. V- 12017/25 /2005 -D.E . ] R. SANKARAN , Under Secy.

विदेश मंत्रालय

(सी.पी.वी. प्रभाग )

नई दिल्ली , 12 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2397.- राजनयिक और कोंसलीय ऑफिसर ( शपथ और फीस ) के अधिनियम, 1948 की धारा 2 के खंड ( क ) के अनुसरण में , केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा श्री राजेश खन्ना सहायक को 12-8-2009 से भारत के राजदूतावास , उलानबेटार में सहायक कोंसुलर अधिकारी के कर्तव्यों का पालन करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[सं. टी -4330/1/2006 ] आर. के. पेरिनडिया, अवर सचिव ( कोंसुलर ) MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS (C. P. V. Division ) New Delhi , the 12th August, 2009

S.O. 2397.- In pursuance of the clause ( a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers ( Oaths and fees ) Act , 1948 ( 41 of 1948 ) , the Central Government hereby authorise Shri Rajesh Khanna , Assistant in the Embassy of India, Ulaanbaatar to perform the duties of Assistant Consular Officer with effect from 12th August, 2009.

[No. T. 4330/01/2006] R. K. PERINDIA , Under Secy. ( Consular) 5072

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5, 2009 / BHADRA 14, 1931

नई दिल्ली , 20 अगस्त, 2009 का.आ. 2398.- राजनयिक और कोंसलीय ऑफिसर ( शपथ और फीस) के अधिनियम , 1948 की धारा 2 के खंड ( क) के अनुसरण में , केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा श्री मति बानी मुकर्जी और श्री उमाकांत शर्मा सहायक को 20-8-2009 से भारत के राजदूतावास , स्टाकहोम में सहायक कोंसुलर अधिकारी के कर्तव्यों का पालन करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[सं. टी -4330/ 1 /2006 ] आर. के. पेरिनडिया , अवर सचिव (कोंसुलर ) New Delhi , the 20th August , 2009 S.O. 2398.-In pursuance of the clause ( a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and fees) Act , 1948 ( 41 of 1948 ) , the Central Government hereby authorise Smt . Bani Mukherjee and Shri Umakant Sharma, Assistant in the Embassy of India, Stockholm to perform the duties of Assistant Consular Officers with effect from 20th August , 2009 .

[No. T -4330/01 /2006] R. K. PERINDIA , Under Secy. ( Consular)

वस्त्र मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2399. केन्द्रीय सरकार , संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए राजभाषा नियम 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम 4 के अनुसरण में , वस्त्र मंत्रालय के अंतर्गत आने वाले निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को जिसमें 80 % से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है : -

1. बुनियादी बीज प्रगुणन एवं प्रशिक्षण केन्द्र , बुतरेबीसं , केतअवप्रसं , केन्द्रीय रेशम बोर्ड , भागलपुर 813210 बिहार ।

2. नेशनल टेक्सटाइल कारपोरेशन लि. , दक्षिणी क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, एन टी सी हाउस , पोस्ट बाक्स नं. 2409 , 35बी , सोमासुन्दरम मिल रोड , कोयम्बटूर 641009 ।

3. नेशनल टेक्सटाइल कारपोरेशन लि. , उप कार्यालय , कोलकाता, कार्मिक व्यवस्था विभाग , 6 , जवाहरलाल नेहरू रोड, कोलकाता ।

[ई-11016/1/2009- हिन्दी ] मोनिका एस. गर्ग , संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF TEXTILES New Delhi , the 25th August, 2009 S.O. 2399.- In pursuance of sub - rule ( 4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language ( use for official purpose of the Union ) Rules , 1976 , the Central Government , hereby , notifies the following office of the Ministry of Textiles , more than 80% staff whereof have acquired working knowledge ofHindi : ---

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] I. Basic Seed Multiplication & Training Centre , BTSSO , CTR & TI , Central Silk Board , Bhagalpur- 813210 ( Bihar) .

2. National Textile Corporation Ltd. , Sourthern Regional Office, NTC House , P.O. Box No. 2409 , 35 - B, Somasundaram Mills Road, Coimbatore-641009 .

3. National Textile Corporation Ltd. , Sub Office, Kolkata, Department of Personnel , 6 , Jawaharlal Nehru Road , Kolkata .

[No. E. 11016/ 1 /2009-Hindi] MONIKA S. GARG, Jt . Secy .

संचार एवं सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय (डाक विभाग ) पोस्टमास्टर जनरल ( केन्द्रीय क्षेत्र ) का कार्यालय तमिलनाडु , 27 अप्रैल , 2009

का. आ. 2400. केन्द्र सरकार की राय है कि श्री सी. आनन्दराजन , पोस्टमेन ( निलंबन के अधीन ) , चिदम्बरनगर एसओ , टूटिकोरिन डिवीजन , तमिलनाडु सर्किल से संबंधित विभागीय जांच के लिए श्री के. अरुणाचलम , 112 /सी के पीछे, सेकन्ड स्ट्रीट तीसरा मैल, शंकर कालनी, टूटिकोरिन -628 008 से दस्तावेज मंगवाना/गवाह को समन करना जरूरी है ।

अतः विभागीय जांच ( गवाह की हाज़िरी प्रवर्तन और दस्तावेज प्रस्तुत करना ) अधिनियम , 1972 ( 18 का 1972 ) की धारा ( 4 ) की उप - धारा ( 2 ) में प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार श्री एस. मारियप्पन , डाक निरीक्षक , सात्तानकुलन सब डिवीजन , टूटिकोरिन पोस्टल डिवीज़न को जांच अधिकारी के रूप में प्राधिकृत करता हैं ताकि वे श्री सी. आनन्दराजन , पोस्टमेन ( निलंबन के अधीन ) , चिदम्बरनगर एसओ , टूटिकोरिन डिवीज़न के संबंध में कथित अधिनियम में निहित धारा 5 का प्रयोग कर सकें ।

[ सं. वीआईजी/4-21/01/ 07 ]

एस. पी. राजलिंगम , पोस्टमास्टर जनरल MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

(Department ofPosts) OFFICE OF THE POSTMASTER GENERAL ( CENTRAL REGION) Tamilnadu , the 27th August , 2009

S.O. 2400. Whereas the Central Government is of opinion that for the purposes of the departmental inquiry relating to Shri C. Anandarajan , Postman ( Under suspension) , Chidambaranagar SO , Tuticorin Division, Tamilnadu Circle it is necessary to summon as witnesses Sri K. Arunachalam , Back to 112 / c , Second Street thired mile , Sankar colony, Tuticorin- 628 008 :

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Departmental 5073 भारत का राजपत्त्र सितम्बर 5 , 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

तमिलनाडु , 27 अप्रैल , 2009

Inquiries ( Enforcement of Attendance of Witnesses and Production of Documents ) Act , 1972 ( 18 of 1972 ) , the Central Government hereby authorizes Shri S. Mariappan , Inspector Posts , Satankulam Sub Division , Tuticorin Postal Division as the inquiring authority to exercise the power specified in Section 5 of the said Act in relation to Shri C. Anandarajan , Postman (Under Suspension) , Chidambaranagar SO , Tuticorin Dn .

का.आ. 2402.- केन्द्र सरकार की राय यह है कि श्री सी. आनन्दराजन , पोस्टमेन ( निलंबन के अधीन ) , चिदम्बरनगर एसओ, टूटिकोरिन डिवीजन , तमिलनाडु सर्किल से संबंधित विभागीय जांच के लिए श्रीमती टी. उच्चीमाकाली , W/ ० श्री तिरुमलैयाण्डि, आर.एस. । 5सी-1 , सोर्णम्माल काम्पउण्ड, पत्तिनाथपुरम टूटिकोरिन -628008 से दस्तावेज मंगवाना/गवाह को समन करना जरूरी है । [No. VIG/4-21/01/07 ]

S. P. RAJALINGAM , Postmaster General

तमिलनाडु , 27 अप्रैल , 2009

अतः विभागीय जांच ( गवाह की हाजिरी प्रवर्तन और दस्तावेज प्रस्तुत करना ) अधिनियम, 1972 ( 18 का 1972 ) के धारा (4 ) के उप- धारा ( 2 ) में प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार श्री एस. मारियप्पन , डाक निरीक्षक , सात्तानकुलन सब डिवीजन , टूटिकोरिन पोस्टल डिवीजन को जांच अधिकारी के रूप में प्राधिकृत करता है ताकि वे श्री सी. आनन्दराजन , पोस्टमेन ( निलंबन के अधीन) , चिदम्बरनगर एसओ , टूटिकोरिन डिवीजन के संबंध में कथित अधिनियम में निहित धारा 5 का प्रयोग कर सकें ।

का.. 2401.- केन्द्र सरकार की राय यह है कि श्री सी. आनन्दराजन , पोस्टमेन ( निलंबन के अधीन ) , चिदम्बरनगर एसओ, टूटिकोरिन डिवीजन , तमिलनाडु सर्किल से संबंधित विभागीय जांच के लिए श्रीमती ए. सुन्दरी , W/o श्री के. अरुणाचलम , 112/सी के पीछे, सेकन्ड स्ट्रीट तीसरा मैल , शंकर कालनी , टूटिकोरिन-628 008 से दस्तावेज़ मंगवाना/गवाह को समन करना जरूरी है ।

[सं. वीआईजी/4-21/01/07 ]

एस. पी. राजलिंगम , पोस्टमास्टर जनरल Tamilnadu , the 27th April , 2009 अतः विभागीय जांच ( गवाह की हाजिरी प्रवर्तन और दस्तावेज प्रस्तुत करना ) अधिनियम, 1972 ( 18 का 1972 ) के धारा ( 4 ) के उप- धारा ( 2 ) में प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार श्री एस. मारियप्पन , डाक निरीक्षक, सात्तानकुलन सब डिवीज़न , टूटिकोरिन पोस्टल डिवीजन को जांच अधिकारी के रूप में प्राधिकृत करता है ताकि वे श्री सी. आनन्दराजन , पोस्टमेन ( निलंबन के अधीन ) , चिदम्बरनगर एसओ , टूटिकोरिन डिवीजन के संबंध में कथित अधिनियम में निहित धारा 5 का प्रयोग कर सकें ।

[सं. वीआईजी/4-21/01/07]

S.O. 2402.- Whereas the Central Government is of opinion that for the purposes of the departmental inquiry relating to Shri C. Anandarajan , Postman ( Under suspension ) ,Chidambaranagar SO , Tuticorin Postal Division , Tamilnadu Circle if is necessary to summon as witnesses Smt. T. Uchimahali , W/ o Sri Thirumalayandi , R. S. 1 5C- 1 , Somammal Compound, Pathinathapuram, Tuticorin -628 008.

एस. पी. राजलिंगम , पोस्टमास्टर जनरल

Tamilnadu, the 27th August , 2009

S.O. 2401.-Whereas the Central Government is of opinion that for the purposes of the departmental inquiry relating to Shri C. Anandarajan , Postman (Under suspension ) , Chidambaranagar SO, Tuticorin Division , Tamilnadu Circle it is necessary to summon as witnesses Smt . A Sundari , W/ o Sri K. Arunachalam , Back to 112/C, Second Street third mile, Sankar colony, Tuticorin - 628 008 .

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred bysub section (1) of Section 4 ofthe Departmental Inquiries (Enforcement of Attendance of Witnesses and Production of Documents ) Act, 1972 ( 18 of 1972 ) , the Central Government hereby authorizes Shri S. Mariappan , Inspector Posts, Satankulam Sub Division , Tuticorin Postal Division as the inquiring authority to exercise the power specified inSection 5 ofthe said Act in relation to Shri C. Anandarajan , Postman ( Under Suspension) , Chidambaranagar SO , TuticorinDn .

[No. VIG/4-21 /01/07]

S. P. RAJALINGAM , Postmaster General तमिलनाडु , 27 अप्रैल , 2009

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred bysub section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Departmental Inquiries (Enforcement of Attendance of Witnesses and Production of Documents) Act, 1972 ( 18 of 1972) , the Central Government hereby authorizes Shri S. Mariappan , Inspector Posts , Satankulam Sub Division , Tuticorin Postal Division as the inquiring authority to exercise the power specified in Section 5 of the said Act in relation to Shri C. Anandarajan , Postman (Under Suspension ) , Chidambaranagar SO, Tuticorin Dn .

[No. VIG/4-21 /01 /07]

का.आ. 2403.-केन्द्र सरकार की राय यह है कि श्री सी. आनन्दराजन , पोस्टमेन ( निलंबन के अधीन ) , चिदम्बरनगर एसओ, टूटिकोरिन डिवीजन , तमिलनाडु सर्किल से संबंधित विभागीय जांच के लिए श्री तिरुमलैयान्डि, आर.एस. 1 5 सी -1 सोर्णम्माल कम्पाउण्ड, पत्तिनाथपुरम, टूटिकोरिन-628 008 से दस्तावेज मंगवाना/गवाह को समन करना जरूरी है ।

S. P. RAJALINGAM, Postmaster General

3056G1/2009-2 5074

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009 /BHADRA 14, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

of Documents ) Act , 1972 ( 18 of 1972 ) , the Central Government hereby specifies Shri S. Mariappan , Inspector Posts , Satankulam Sub Division , Tuticorin Postal Division as an authority to exercise the power conferred on the Central Government by sub section ( 1 ) of Section 4 ofthe said Act in respect of (category of Government servants) against whom a departmental inquiry may be held.

[No. VIG/4-21/01/07] अतः विभागीय जांच ( गवाह की हाजिरी प्रवर्तन और दस्तावेज प्रस्तुत करना ) अधिनियम , 1972 ( 18 का 1972 ) के धारा (4 ) के उप- धारा ( 2 ) में प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार श्री एस. मारियप्पन , डाक निरीक्षक, सात्तानकुलम सब डिवीजन, टूटिकोरिन पोस्टल डिवीजन को जांच अधिकारी के रूप में प्राधिकृत करता है ताकि वे श्री सी. आनन्दराजन , पोस्टमेन ( निलंबन के अधीन ) , चिदम्बरनगर एसओ , टूटिकोरिन डिवीजन के संबंध में कथित अधिनियम में निहित धारा 5 का प्रयोग कर सकें ।

S. P. RAJALINGAM Postmaster General

उपभोक्तामामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय [सं. वीआईजी/4-21/01/07 ]

( उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग ) भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

एस. पी. राजलिंगम , पोस्टमास्टर जनरल Tamilnadu , the 27th April , 2009

नई दिल्ली, 20 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2405.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

S.O. 2403.- Whereas the Central Government is of opinion that for the purposes of the departmental inquiry relating to Shri C. Anandarajan , Postman ( Under suspension ) , Chidambaranagar SO, Tuticorin postal Division , Tamilnadu Circle it is necessary to summon as witnesses Sri Thirumalayandi . R. S. 1 5C - 1 , Sornammal Compound, Pathinathapuram , Tuticorin -628 008.

क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक सं. ( कों) की संख्या वर्ष औरशीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक स्थापित तिथि द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

(1) (2)

(3)

(4)

आई एस 1990 : 30 अप्रैल,

1973

2009 Now therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Departmental Inquiries (Enforcement of Attendance of Witnesses and Production of Documents) Act , 1972 ( 18 of 1972 ) , the Central Government hereby authorizes Shri S. Mariappan , Inspector Posts, Satankulam Sub Division , Tuticorin Postal Division as the inquiring authority to exercise the power specified in Section 5 of the said Act in relation to Shri C. Anandarajan , Postman (Under Suspension) , Chidambaranagar SO, Tuticorin Dn .

( 1 ) आई एस 1990:2009- वायलर हेतु इस्पात के रिवेट एवं स्टे बार

[No. VIG/4-21 /01/07 ]

(दूसरा पुनरीक्षण)

S. P. RAJALINGAM , Postmaster General

तमिलनाडु, 27 अप्रैल , 2009

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयोंः नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : एमटीडी4/टी-10] का.आ. 2404.- विभागीय जांच ( गवाह की हाजिरी प्रवर्तन और दस्तावेज प्रस्तुत करना ) अधिनियम , 1972 ( 18 का 1972 ) के धारा (4 ) के उप- धारा ( 2 ) में प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार श्री एस. मारियप्पन , डाक निरीक्षक, सात्तानकुलम सब डिवीजन , टूटिकोरिन पोस्टल डिवीजन को विभागीय जांच के अवसर पर ( सरकारी कर्मचारियों के वर्ग में ) धारा ( 4 ) के उप - धारा ( 2 ) में प्रदत्त केन्द्र सरकार के शक्तियों का प्रयोग करने के लिए प्राधिकृत किया जाता है ।

श्री पी. घोष , वैज्ञानिक ' ई ' एवं प्रमुख ( एमटीडी) MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

[सं. वीआईजी/4-21/ 01 / 07 ]

एस. पी. राजलिंगम , पोस्टमास्टर जनरल

(Department of Consumer Affairs ) BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS New Delhi , the 20th August , 2009 Tamilnadu , the 27th August , 2009

S.O. 2404. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (2 ) of Section 4 of the Departmental Inquiries (Enforcement of Attendance of Witnesses and Production

S.O. 2405. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule (1) of Rules 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules. 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

5075 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

date indicated against each :--

SCHEDULE

Sl. No.

Date of Established

No. & year of the Indian Standards Established

No. & year of Indian Standards , ifany, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(1 ) (2)

(3)

(4)

IS 1990 : 1973

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolcatta, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

30April2009

[Ref: MTD4/T- 10 ] IS1990 : 2009- Steel rivets and staybars for boilers(second revision)

SHRI P. GHOSH, Scientist ' E ' & Head (MTD)

नई दिल्ली, 21 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2406. - भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो प्रमाणन विनियम , 1988 के नियम 4 के उप- विनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-( माह । फरवरी , 2009 से 30जून , 2009)

अनुसूची

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

क्रम सं.

लाइसेंस सं. सीएम/एल-

स्वीकृत करने की तिथि वर्ष/माह

भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक भा. मा. संख्या भाग अनु वर्ष

1. 9708392 05-02-2009

IS 13334 :Part 1 : 1998 स्किम्ड मिल्क पावडर- भाग -1 स्टैण्डर्ड ग्रेड

मै. प्रीमियर मिल्क फूड प्रा. लि. एफ-1 , नैना अपार्टमेन्ट, 179/5 सिविल लाइन्स, स्टेशन रोड , जिला- बरेली , यू.पी.

2. 9708493 05-02-2009

IS458: 2003 प्रीकास्ट कंक्रीट पाइप्स मै. जयं दुर्गे बाबा पाइप इण्ड. विलेज- कोलबाज बहादुर , पोस्ट- भवरनाथ , जिला-आजमगढ़

3. 9709091 06-02-2009

IS398: Part 2: 1996 एल्यूमीनियम मै. आरावली इन्फ्रापावर लि. , प्लाट नं. 7 , फेस 2 , सिडकल इण्डस्ट्रियल पार्क , सितारगंज जिला-ऊद्यमसिंह नगर , उत्तराखण्ड

कल्डक्टर्स फार ओवरहेड ट्रान्समिशन पर्पजेज भाग -2 एल्यूमिनियम कल्डक्टर्स, गैल्वनाइज्ड स्टील रेनफोर्ड

4. 9709192 06-02-2009

पैकेज्ड डिंकिग वाटर (अदर देन पैकेज्ड नेचुरल मिनरल वाटर) IS 14543 : 2004 मै. तेज बोटलर्स प्रा. लि. 521/154 , बाबा चांद गंज , बीपी रोड, महानगर जिला-लखनऊ

5. 9710379 12-02-2009

क्रासलिंक्ड पालीथिलिन इन्सुलेटेड पीवीसी सीथेड केबल्स: भाग -1 फार वर्किंग वोल्टेज अपटु एण्ड इन्कलूडिंग 1100 वोल्ट आईएसः 7098 : भाग 1 : 1988

मै. गुप्ता पावर इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लि. , प्लाट नं. 132 , 132ए एवं 132बी , नन्द नगर इण्डस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , फेस- II , महुआ खेडा गंज , काशीपुर, जिला-ऊद्यमसिंह नगर , उत्तराखण्ड

6. 9710480 12-02-2009

पीवीसी इन्सुलेटेड हैवी ड्यूटी इलेक्ट्रिक केबल्स: भाग-1 फार वर्किंग वोल्टेजेज अपटु एण्ड इन्कलूडिंग 1100 वोल्ट आई एस: 1554 भाग 1 : 1988

मै. गुप्ता पावर इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लि. , प्लाट नं. 132 , 132 ए एवं 132बी , नन्द नगर इण्डस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , फेस -11 , महुआ खेडा गंज , काशीपुर, जिला-ऊद्यमसिंह नगर , उत्तराखण्ड

7. 9711078 18-02-2009 मै. विनीत प्लास्टिकस लिमिटेड , सी-21/4 क, मल्दहिया , जिला वाराणसी , यूपी ,

यूपीवीसी पाइप्स फार पोटेबल वाटर सप्लाइज IS4985: 2000 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009 /BHADRA 14, 1931

5076

4 2

25-02-2009

8. 9712181

मै. एएसपी सीलिंग प्रोडक्टस लिमिटेड , ए-7 , यूपीएसआईडीसी, इण्डस्ट्रियल एरिया, गजरौला , जिला ज्योतबा फुले नगर, यूपी

26-02-2009

9. 9712383

मै. अग्रवाल जेवेल्स एण्ड गेम्स प्रा. लि. जे-1 , चन्द्रमा बाजार , भूतनाथ , इंदिरा नगर , जिला-लखनऊ , यूपी

03-03-2009

10. 9713284

मै. हजारीलाल गौरी शंकर ज्वैलर्स, पुराना बाजार , जिला- बदायूँ, यूपी

09-03-2009

11. 9715086

मै. सुपर हाउस लिमिटेड, बी-6, साइट -1 , इण्डस्ट्रियल एरिया , यूपीएसआईडीसी जिला-उन्नाव , यूपी

16-03-2009

12. 9715692

मै. सीटीएस इन्फ्राटेक प्रा. लि. 12/10, मारवारी गंज, जिला- बरेली , यूपी

17-03-2009

13. 9716189

मैं. अभिनव स्टील्स प्रा. लि. , प्लाट नं. ए-18,19,25,26 , एण्ड 27 सिडा, सथारिया , जिला-जौनपुर, यूपी

06-04-2009

14. 9720382

मै. मंगला प्लाईवुड प्रा. लि. , 10 किमी. स्टोन , नगीना रोड , जिला-बिजनौर

06-04-2009

15. 9720483

मै. मंगला प्लाईवुड प्रा. लि. , 10 किमी. स्टोन , नगीना रोड, जिला-बिजनौर

06-04-2009

16. 9720584

मै. मंगला प्लाईवुड प्रा. लि. , 10 किमी स्टोन , नगीना रोड , जिला- बिजनौर

16-04-2009

17. 9722487

मै. मेघालय प्लाईवुड प्रा. लि. , तारा का पुरवा, तिवारीगंज , फैजाबाद रोड, चिनहट , लखनऊ

16-04-2009

18. 9722588

मै. मेघालय प्लाईवुड प्रा. लि. , तारा का पुरवा , तिवारीगंज , फैजाबाद रोड, चिनहट , लखनऊ

16-04-2009

19. 9722689

मै. मेघालय प्लाईवुड प्रा. लि. , तारा का पुरवा , तिवारीगंज , फैजाबाद रोड , चिनहट , लखनऊ

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] 5

रबर होज फार लिक्विफाइड पेट्रोलियम गैस एल पी जी आई एस : 9573 : 1998

गोल्ड एण्ड गोल्ड एलाएज , ज्वैलरी एलाएज/ आर्टिफैक्ट्स-फाइननेस एण्ड मार्किंग IS 1417: 1999

सेफटी , प्रोटेक्टिव एण्ड आक्कुपेशनल फुटवियर फार प्रोफेशनल यूज- भाग : 2 स्पेसिफिकेशन फार सेफटी फुटवियर आईएस 15298 : भाग-2:2002

एरियल बन्चेड केबल्स फार वर्किंग वोल्टेजेज अपटु एण्ड इन्कलूडिंग 1100 वोल्ट आईएस 14255 : 1995

कार्बन स्टील कास्ट बैलट इगनॉटस , बैलट्स, ब्लूम्स एण्ड स्लेब्स फार रि - रोलिंग इनटू लो टेनसाइल स्ट्रक्चरल स्टील्स आईएस 2831 : 2001

प्लाईवुड फार जनरल पर्पजेज आईएस 203 : 1989

ब्लाक बोर्ड्स आईएस 1659 : 2004 वुडेन फलश डोर शटर्स ( सालिड कोर टाइप ) भाग !: प्लाईवुड फेस पैनल्स IS 2202: Part-1:1999

प्लाईवुड फार जनरल पर्पजेज आईएस 303 : 1989

वुडेन फलश डोर शटर्स ( सालिड कोर टाइप ) भाग -1 : प्लाईवुड फेस पैनल्स IS 2202 : Part: 1999

ब्लाक बोर्ड्स आईएस 1659 : 2004 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्त्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

1 2

20. 9721990 20-04-2009 मै . पन्ना लाल कपूर गोल्ड डीलर 4 एवं 6 हलवसिया मार्केट , हजरतगंज , जिला- लखनऊ 21. 9721485 21-04-2009 मै. इण्डिया पेस्टीसाइड्स लि. , प्लाट नं. ई -17 , 18 से 23 , यूपीएसआईडीसी इण्डस्ट्रियल एरिया. , चिनहट , देवा रोड , जिला- लखनऊ, यूपी 22. 9722891 22-04-2009 मै. रहीद दाद खान ग्राम- उरलिया , पोस्ट खटिया , जिला- बदायूँ, यूपी 23. 9723893 24-04-2009 मै. प्रभू इलेक्ट्रिकल इण्डस्ट्रीज इण्डिया 41/537 , गंगा देई लेन , अपोजिट सरस्वती वाटिका विद्यालय , नरही , जिला-लखनऊ, यूपी

22-05-2009

24. 9728705

मै. राजश्री फूड एण्ड बेवरेजेज 1/336ए विराट खण्ड, गोमतीनगर, जिला- लखनऊ 25. 9730890 09-06-2009 मै. गेक प्लास्ट कन्टेनर्स प्रा. लि. , सी-25-26, सेक्टर-20 , इण्डस्ट्रियल एरिया , जगदीशपुर , जिला- सुलतानपुर, यू.पी.

09-06-2009

26. 9730991

मै. गेक प्लास्ट कन्टेनर्स प्रा. लि. , सी-25-26, सेक्टर -20 , इण्डस्ट्रियल एरिया , जगदीशपुर, जिला- सुलतानपुर , यू.पी.

27. 9731286 11-06-2009 मै. पशुपति एवरेस्ट प्लाईवुड के-2, के-3 इण्डस्ट्रियल एरिया , परसाखेडा बरेली, यू.पी.

28. 9731387 11-06-2009 मै. महावीर इण्डस्ट्रीज , बी-66 , परसाखेडा, इण्डस्ट्रियल एरिया , रोड नं. 4 बरेली , यू.पी.

11-06-2009

29. 9731488

नीलकंठ लिक्वर एण्ड डिस्टिलरीज प्रा. लि. , 403 आरिफ पैलेस कोर्ट, 6/6 माल एरीना, लखनऊ , यू.पी.

12-06-2009

30. 9732288

मै. बजाज ईको- टेक प्रोडक्टस लि. , ग्राम एवं पोस्ट- पलिया कला , जिला- खीरी, यू.पी.

12-06-2009

31. 9732389

मै. ए के पैनल प्रोडक्ट विलेज उत्तरधौना , तिवारीगंज , फैजाबाद रोड, लखनऊ, यू.पी.

5077 5

गोल्ड एण्ड गोल्ड एलाएज , ज्वैलरी एलाएज/ आर्टिफैक्ट्स फाइननेस एण्ड मार्किंग IS 1417 : 1999

डाइक्लोरवास इमल्सिफिएबल कन्सेन्ट्रेट्स आईएस 5277 1978

डीपवेल हैण्डपम्प्स, कम्पानेन्ट्स एण्ड स्पेशल टूल्स आई एस 15500 भाग 2 : 2004 प्रापेलर टाइप एसी वेन्टीलेटिंग फैन्स आईएस 2312 : 1967

पैकेज्ड डिंकिग वाटर ( अदर देन पैकेज्ड नेचुरल मिनरल वाटर ) IS 14543: 2004 वुडेन फलश डोर शटर्स ( सालिड कोर टाइप ) भाग -1 : प्लाईवुड फेस पैनल्स IS 2202 : Part- 1 : 1999

प्लाईवुड फार जनरल पर्पजेज आईएस 303 1989

वुडेन फलश डोर शटर्स ( सालिड कोर टाइप ) भाग -1 : प्लाईवुड फेस पैनल्स IS 2202: Part- 1 : 1999

वुडेन फलश डोर शटर्स ( सालिड कोर टाइप ) भाग -1 : प्लाईवुड फेस पैनल्स IS 2202 : Part- 1 : 1999

पैकेज्ड ड्रिंकिग वाटर ( अदर देन पैकेज्ड नेचुरल मिनरल वाटर ) IS 14543 : 2004 प्रीलेमिनेटेड मीडियम डेन्सिटी फाइबर बोर्ड आईएस 14587 1998

वुडेन फलश डोर शटर्स ( सालिड कोर टाइप ) भाग -1 : प्लाईवुड फेस पैनल्स IS 2202: Part 1: 1999 5078

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5, 2009/ BHADRA 14 , 1931

4 32. 9732490 15-06-2009 मै. वीनियर सा मिल्स गुप्ता जी का हाथ , दूसरा मोती नगर लेन, ऐश बाग रोड, जिला लखनऊ , यू.पी.

33. 9732591 15-06-2009 मै. वीनियर सा मिल्स गुप्ता जी का हाथ , दूसरा मोती नगर लेन , ऐश बाग रोड, जिला लखनऊ यू.पी.

34. 9732692 15-06-2009 मै. वीनियर सा मिल्स गुप्ता जी का हाथ , दूसरा मोती नगर लेन , ऐश बाग रोड, जिला लखनऊ , यू.पी.

35. 9732793 15-06-2009 मै. शालीमार इंजीनियर्स , 20 , मुरारी नगर, फैजाबाद रोड , जिला लखनऊ यू.पी.

36. 9734191 18-06-2009 ए बी एस बेवरेजेज प्रा. लि. यूनिट नं. 2 प्रथम तल प्राइम प्लाजा, मुंशी पुलिया , इंदिरा नगर, जिला लखनऊ, यू.पी.

37. 9734595 19-06-2009 मै. बजाज ईको- टेक प्रोडक्टस लि. , ग्राम कुन्दरीची , पीओ-गोबिन्दपुरा जिला-गोण्डा, यू.पी.

38. 9735803 29-06-2009 मै. शकुम्भरी स्ट्रा प्रोडक्ट्स लि. , बी. 92 , गांधीनगर , जिला- मुरादाबाद , यू.पी.

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 5

प्लाईवुड फार जनरल पर्पजेज आईएस 303 : 1989

वुडेन फलश डोर शटर्स ( सालिड कोर टाइप ) भाग-1 प्लाईवुड फेस पैनल्स IS 2202:

Part 1 : 1999

ब्लाक बोर्ड्स आईएस 1659 : 2004

प्रीकास्ट कंक्रीट पाइप्स IS 458 : 2003 पैकेज्ड डिंकिग वाटर ( अदर देन पैकेज्ड नेचुरल मिनरल वाटर ) IS 14543: 2004 प्रीलेमिनेटेड मीडियम डेन्सिटी फाइबर बोर्ड आईएस 14587 : 1998

राइटिंग एंड प्रिंटिंग पेपर आईएस 1848 : 1991

[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ] पी. के. गम्भीर , उपमहानिदेशक (मुहर )

New Delhi , the 21st August , 2009

S. O. 2406. In pursuance of sub - regulation (5) of the regulation 4 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulation 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of particulars of which are given in the following schedule. (Period from 01-02-2009 to 30-06-2009 )

SCHEDULE

Name & Address of the Party Sl . Licence no . Grant Date No. CM/L

05-02-2009

1. 9708392

M/ s PREMIER MILK FOODS ( P) LTD F- 1 Naina Appartments , 179/5 Civil Lines , Station Road, Distt : Bareilly , U. P.

2. 9708493 05-02-2009 M/sJAY DURGEY BABA PIPE IND . Vill-Koibaz Bahadoor , Post- Bhawarnath , Distt: Azamgarh .

Title of the Standard IS No. Part Sec . Year

SkimmedMilk Powder Specification - Part1 : Standard Grade IS 13334: Part 1 : 1998

Precast Concrete Pipes (with and withoutReinforcement) IS458 : 2003 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/भाद्र 14 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

3. 9709091 06-02-2009 M/ sARAVALI INFRAPOWER LIMITED Plot No - 7, Phase-2 , SEDCUL Industrial Park, Sitarganj , Distt : U. S. Nagar , Uttarakhand.

4. 9709192 06-02-2009 M/sTEJ BOTTLERS PVT LTD 521/154, Bada Chandganj , B.P.Road, Mahanagar , Distt: Lucknow, U. P.

12-02-2009

5. 9710379

M/sGupta Power Infrastructure LTD. , Plot No. 132, 132A & 132B , Nand Nagar Industrial Estate , Phase II , Mahua Khera Ganj , Kashipur Distt : U. S. Nagar , Uttarakhand.

12-02-2009

6. 9710480

M/sGupta Power Infrastructure LTD. , Plot No. 132, 132A & 132B , Nand Nagar Industrial Estate , Phase II , Mahua Khera Ganj, Kashipur Distt : US Nagar , Uttarakhand,

18-02-2009

7. 9711078

M/ s VINEET PLASTICS LIMITED C-21 /4 ΚΑ , ΜALDAHIYA " Distt: Varanasi , U. P.

25-02-2009

8. 9712181

M/ s ASP SEALING PRODUCTS LIMITED A- 7, UPSIDE , Industrial Area , Gajraula, Distt: Jyotiba Phule Nagar , U. P.

9. 9712383 26-02-2009 M/sAgarwal Jewels & Gems Pvt . LTD. G- 1 , Chandrama Bazar , Bhootnath , Indira Nagar, Distt : Lucknow , U. P

10. 9713284 03-03-2009 M/sHazariLal Gauri Shanker Jewellers Purana Bazar , Distt : Budaun , U. P.

09-03-2009

II . 9715086

M/sSuperhouse LIMITED B -6, Site- I , Industrial Area, UPSIDC " Distt : Unnao , U. P.

16-03-2009

12. 9715692

M/sCTS INFRATECH PVT LTD 12/10 , Marwari ganj , Distt: Bareilly, U. P.

17-03-2009

13. 9716189

M/ s ABHINAV STEELS PVT . LTD . Plot No A 18,19,25,26 & 27 SIDA , SATHARIYA, Distt : Jaunpur , U. P.

06-04-2009

14. 9720382

M/sMANGLA PLYWOOD PVT LTD 10 Km . Stone, Nagina Road, Distt: Bijnor , U. P.

06-04-2009

15. 9720483

M/sMANGLA PLYWOOD PVT LTD 10 Km . Stone , Nagina Road" Distt: Bijnor, U. P.

5079 5

Aluminium conductors for overhead transmission purposes : Part 2 Aluminium conductors , galvanized steel reinforced IS 398 : Part 2 : 1996

Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) - Specification IS 14543 : 2004

Crosslinked polyethylene insulated PVC sheathed cables : Part 1 For working voltage upto and ncluding 1100 V IS 7098 : Part 1 : 1988

PVC insulated (heavy duty) electric Cables: Part 1 For working voltages upto and including 1100 V IS 1554: Part 1 : 1988

Unplasticized PVC Pipes for Potable WaterSupplies- Specification IS4985 : 2000

Rubber hose for liquefied petroleum gas(LPG) -Specification IS 9573 : 1998

Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/ Artefacts- Fineness and Marking - Specification IS 1417 : 1999

Safety, Protective and Occupational Footwear forProfessional use - Part 2 : Specification for Safety Footwear IS 15298: Part 2 : 2002

Aerial Bunched Cables for working Voltages upto and including 1100 Volts- specification IS 14255 : 1995 Carbon Steel Cast Billet Ignots , Billets, Blooms and Slabs For Re- rolling into Low Tensile Structural Steel- Specification IS 2831 : 2001 plywood for general purposes IS 303 : 1989

BlockBoards IS 1659 :2004 5080

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER5 , 2009/BHADRA 14, 1931

4 16. 9720584 06-04-2009 M/sMangla Plywood Pvt . Ltd. 10 Km. Stone , Nagina Road , Distt: Bijinor , UP .

17. 9722487 16-04-2009

M/ sMeghalaya Timber Products Tara Ka Purwa, Tiwariganj , Faizabad Road, Chinhat, Distt : Lucknow,

18. 9722588 16-04-2009 M/sMeghalaya Timber Products Tara Ka Purwa, Tiwariganj , Faizabad Road , Chinhat, Lucknow , U P

19. 9722689 16-04-2009 M/sMeghalaya Timber Products Tara Ka Purwa, Tiwariganj , Faizabad Road, Chinhat , Distt : Lucknow, UP 20. 9721990 20-04-2009 M/sPanna Lal Kapoor Gold Dealer 4&6 Halwasia Market Hazratganj , Distt: Lucknow , UP 21. 9721485 21-04-2009 M/ sIndia Pesticides Ltd Plot No. E - 17 , 18 To 23 , UPSIDC Industrial Area , Chinhat , Deva Road, Distt: Lucknow U P. 22. 9722891 22-04-2009 M/ sRahim Dad Khan Gram -Uraliya, Post-Khtiya , Distt: Budaun, U P 23. 9723893 24-04-2009 Prabhu Electrical Industries ( India) 41/537, Ganga Dei Lane , Opp . Saraswati Balika Vidyalaya, Narahi , Distt: Lucknow , U P. 24. 9728705 22-05-2009 M/sRajshri Food & Beverages 1/336, Virat Khand , Gomtinagar, Distt: Lucknow, U P. 25. 9730890 09-06-2009 M/s Gak Plast Containars Pvt . Ltd. C-25-26, Sector - 20, Industrial Area, Jagdishpur , Distt: Sultanpur , UP.

26. 9730991 09-06-2009 M/ sGak Plast Containars Pvt . Ltd. C-25-26, Sector - 20, Industrial Area, Jagdishpur , Distt: Sultanpur , U P. 27. 9731286 11-06-2009 M/sPashupati Everest Plywood Woodenflush door shutters ( solid core type): Part 1 Plywood face panels Distt: Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh .

28. 9731387 11-06-2009 M/sMahaveer Industries B - 66, Parsakhera Industrial Area, Road No.4, Distt: Bareilly , U P. 29. 9731488 11-06-2009 NeelKanth Liquor &Distilleries (P) Ltd 403 Arif Palace Court, 6/6 Mall Arena , Distt: Lucknow , U P. 30. 9732288 12-06-2009 M/sBajaj Eco -Tec ProductsLtd. Vill-Pallia Kalan , P.O- Pallia Kalan, Distt:Kheri , U P 31. 9732389 12-06-2009 M/sA K Panel Product Vill.Uttardhauna, Tiwariganj Faizabad Road, Distt : Lucknow , U P 5

Wooden flush door shutters ( solid core type): Part 1 Plywood face panels IS 2202: Part 1 : 1999 Plywood for general purposes IS303: 1989

Wooden flushdoor shutters (solid coretype): Part 1 Plywood face panels IS 2202 : Part 1 : 1999 BlockBoards IS 1659:2004

Gold andGoldAlloys , Jewellery/- Artefacts Fineness and Marking - Specification IS 14171 1999

Dichlorvos Emulsifiable Concentrates IS 5277 : 1978

Deepwell handpumps , Components and Special Tools- Handpumps IS 15500: Part 2: 2004

Propeller type ac venţilating fans IS23 12 : 1967

Packaged Drinking Water (other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) IS 14543 : 2004

Wooden flush door shutters (solid Core type) Part 1 Plywood face panels IS 2202: Part 1 : 1999

Plywood for general purposes IS303: 1989

K-2, K- 3 Industrial Area , Persakhera , IS 2202: Part 1 : 1999

Woodenflush door shutters (solid core type) : Part 1 Plywood face panels IS 2202: Part 1: 1999

Packaged Drinking Water ( other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) IS14543: 2004

Prelaminated medium density fibre board IS 14587 : 1998

Wooden flush door shutters ( solid core type): Part 1 Plywood face panels IS 2202: Part 1 : 1999 5081 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/भाद्र 14 , 1931

15-06-2009

32. 9732490

Plywood for general purposes IS 303 : 1989

M/sVeneer Saw Mills Gupta Ji Ka Hath , 2nd Moti Nagar Lane , Aish Bagh Road Distt : Lucknow , U P.

33. 9732591 15-06-2009

Wooden flush door shutters ( solid core type): Part 1 Plywood face panels IS 2202: Part 1 : 1999

M/s Veneer Saw Mills Gupta Ji Ka Hath , 2nd Moti Nagar Lane , Aish Bagh Road, Distt : Lucknow, U P.

34. 9732692 15-06-2009

Block Boards IS 1659 :2004

M/ sVeneer Saw Mills Gupta Ji Ka Hath , 2nd Moti Nagar Lane , Aish Bagh Road , Distt : Lucknow, U P.

35. 9732793 15-06-2009

Precast Concrete Pipes ( with and without Reinforcement) IS458: 2003

M/sShalimar Engineers 20, Murari Nagar , Faizabad Road" Distt: Lucknow , U P.

36. 9734191 18-06-2009

Packaged drinking water (other than packaged Natural Mineral Water) IS14543 : 2004

ABS Beverages(P) Ltd. (Unit No. 2) 1 st floor Prime Plaza, Munsi Pulia, Indra Nagar, Distt: Lucknow, UP.

37. 9734595 19-06-2009

Prelaminated medium density fibre board IS 14587 : 1998

M/sBajaj Eco - Tec Products Ltd. Vill-Kundarichi , P.O-Gobindpora,, Kunderkhi , Distt : Gonda , U P

38. 9735803 29-06-2009

Writing and printing paper IS 1848: 1991 .

M/sShakumbhri Straw Products Ltd. B-92, Gandhi Nagar , Distt: Moradabad , U. P.

[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ]

P. K. GAMBHIR, Dy . Director General (Marks)

नई दिल्ली , 21 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2407.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो प्रमाणन विनियम , 1988 के नियम 4 के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

लाइसेंस सं

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

क्रम सं

अनु वर्ष भाग स्वीकृत करने की तिथि/वर्ष/माह

भा. मा. भाग संख्या

8 9 1

1991 1. 7952801 02-07-2009

1489

पोर्टलैंड पोजोलाना सीमेंट भाग । फ्लाई एश आधारित

द इंडिया सीमेंट्स लिमिटेड स.नं. 101 , 102 , 105 परली वैजनाथ जिला बीड 431515 महाराष्ट्र ।

12269

1987 2. 7952902 02-07-2009

53 ग्रेड सामान्य पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट

द इंडिया सीमेंट्स लिमिटेड स.नं. 101 , 102 , 105 परली वैजनाथ जिला बीड 431515 महाराष्ट्र ।

1989 3. 7953601

12786

08-07-2009

सिंचाई उपकरण-सिंचाई लेटरल्स के लिए पॉलीथिलीन पाइप्स

अल्फाप्लास्टइरीगेशन सिस्टम्स प्लाट नं. ए-48 एम आय डी सी एरिया जिला परभणी 431401 महाराष्ट्र ।

3056GI/ 2009-3 5082

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5, 2009/BHADRA 14 , 1931

4 1

08-07-2009

4. 7953702

अल्फाप्लास्ट इरीगेशन सिस्टम्स प्लाट नं. ए-48 एम आय डी सी एरिया जिला परभणी 431401 महाराष्ट्र ।

5. 7941489 9-07-2009 अमित इंडस्ट्रीज गट संख्या 266 तोकवाडी तालुका परली-वैजनाथ जिला बीड 431515 महाराष्ट्र । 6. 7950793 15-07-2009 अथर्व अकुआ स. नं. 21/2 ए/पी भाजगांव तालुका मावल जिला पुणे, 410405 महाराष्ट्र । 7. 7946907 15-07-2009 शिवांजली अकुआ गट संख्या 2/3/1 एट पोस्ट मान तालुका मुलशी जिला पुणे 411057 महाराष्ट्र । 8. 7957104 20-07-2009 श्रीगोपाल एजेंसी प्लॉट नं. एच -7/डी एम आय डीसी कुपवाड तालुका मिरज जिला सांगली 416436 महाराष्ट्र ।

21-07-2009

9. 7943392

महालक्ष्मी बेवरेजेज प्लॉट नं. ए-38 , अतिरिक्त एम आय डी सी जिला लातूर 413531 महाराष्ट्र ।

21-07-2009

10. 7957407

सोनीगारा ज्वैलर्स प्रा लि 201 , मुंबई- पुणे रोड चिंचवड स्टेशन जिला पुणे 411019 महाराष्ट्र ।

21-07-2009

11. 7957306

सोलंकीज्वैलर्स , दुकान नं. 4 , मैन रोड, शिवाजी मार्केट , सांगवी, जिला पुणे 411027 महाराष्ट्र ।

21-07-2009

12. 7957508

वर्माज्वैलर्स 40, मगर अली , हडपसर गांव, जिला पुणे 411028 महाराष्ट्र ।

23-07-2009

13. 7940083

पदमश्री वॉटर सॉल्यूशंस स. नं. 676 , एट पोस्ट वेलू तालुका भोर जिला पुणे महाराष्ट्र ।

23-07-2009

14. 7952292

अकुआटेक क्रिस्टल वॉटर प्रा. लि. गट संख्या 399 गांव उरावदे तालुका मुलशी जिला पुणे 411042 महाराष्ट्र ।

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

9 5

1992

13487

सिंचाई उपकरण-इमीटर्स

14543

2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

2004

14543

पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

2004

14543

पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

2000

4985

पेयजल आपूर्ति के लिए अनप्लास्टिसाइज्ड पीवीसी पाइप्स ।

2004

14543

पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

1417

1999 स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन ।

1999

1417

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन ।

1999

1417

स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुधता एवं मुहरांकन ।

2004

14543

पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

2004

14543

पैकेजबंद पेयजल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

[सं. सी एम डी/13 : 11 ]

पी. के. गम्भीर, उप - महानिदेशक (मुहर ) 5083

भारत का राजपत्त्र सितम्बर 5, 2009/भाद्र 14 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 21st August , 2009

S. O. 2407.-In pursuance of sub - regulation (5 ) ofthe regulation 4 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification ) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

Grant Date Name & Address of the Party Sl . No.

Licence No.

1. 7952801 02-07-2009 The India Cements Ltd S. No. 101 , 102 , 105 , Parli Vaijnath District Beed 431515 Maharashtra 2. 7952902 02-07-2009 The India Cements Ltd S. No. 101 , 102, 105 , Parli Vaijnath District Beed 431515 Maharashtra 3. 7953601 08-07-2009 Alpha Plast Irrigation Systems Plot No. A-48 , MIDC Area District Parbhani 431401 Maharashtra

08-07-2009

4 7953702

Alpha Plast Irrigation Systems Plot No. A-48 , MIDC Area District Parbhani 431401 Maharashtra

09-07-2009

5. 7941489

Amit Industries GatNo. 266, Tokwadi Taluka Parli -Vaijnath , District Beed 431515 Maharashtra

15-07-2009

6. 7950793

Attharva Aqua S. No. 21/2 A/P , Bhajgaon Taluka Maval , District Pune 410405 Maharashtra

15-07-2009

7. 7946907

ShivanjaliAqua Gat No. 2/3/1 , At Post Maan Taluka Mulshi, District Pune 411057 Maharashtra

20-7-2009

8. 7957104

Shri Gopal Agency Plot No. H - 7 /D, MIDC Kupwad TalukaMiraj District Sangli 416436 Maharashtra

9. 7943392 21-7-2009 Mahalaxmi Beverages Plot No. A - 38 , Addl . MIDC District Latur 413531 Maharashtra 21-7-2009

10. 7957407

Sonigara Jewellers Pvt . Ltd. 201 , Mumbai - Pune Road Chinchwad Station Distriet Pune 411019 Maharashtra 21-7-2009

11. 7957306

Solanki Jewellers Shop No. 4, Main Road Shivaji Market , Sangvi District Pune 411027 Maharashtra 21-7-2009

12. 7957508

Verma Jewellers 40, Magar Ali Hadapsar Goan District Pune 411028 Maharashtra 13. 7940083 23-07-2009 Padmashri Waters Solutions S. No. 676 At Post Welu Taluka Bhor, District Pune , Maharashtra Title of the Standard IS No. Part Sec . Year

8 9 5

1489 01

1991 Portland pozzolana cement Part 1 Flyash based

12269

1987 53 Grade Ordinary Portland cement

1989

12786

Irrigation equipment- Polyethylene pipes for irrigation laterals

13487

1992 Irrigation equipment- emitters

2004

14543

Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

2004

14543

Packaged drinking water ( Other than packaged natural mineral water)

2004

14543

Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)

2000 Unplasticized PVC pipes 4985 for potable water supplies

2004

14543

Packaged drinking water (Otherthan packaged natural mineral water)

1999

1417

Gold and gold alloys , Jewellery/artefacts- Fineness and marking

1999

1417

Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- Fineness and marking

1999

1417

Gold and gold alloys, jewellery/artefacts- Fineness and marking

2004

14543

Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water) 5084

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009/ BHADRA 14 , 1931

Aquatech Crystal Waters Pvt Ltd

14. 7952242 23-07-2009

GatNo. 399, Village Urawade Taluka Mulshi . District Pune 411042 Maharashtra

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

9 5

2004

14543

Packaged drinking water ( Other than packaged natural mineral water )

[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ] P. K. GAMBHIR. Dy. Director General ( Marks )

नई दिल्ली , 21 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2408.-- भारतीय भानक ब्यूरो प्रमाणन विनियम , 1988 के विनियम के उप- विनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गयी तारीख से रद्द कर दिया गया है:- ( माह । फरवरी 2009 से 30 जून 2009 )

अनुसूची

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

क्रम सं

लाइसेंस सं सीएम एल संख्या

1 959190 मै. रामा पालीमर्स प्रा.लि. विलेज- मकरा त्रिलोचन महादेव , जौनपुर - वाराणसी हाईवे, पीओ- लहंगपुर, जिला जौनपुर , उ.प्र.

2 966820S मै. अदिति इन्टरप्राइजेज विलेज- सुगामउ , कुकरैल पिकनिक स्पाट के पास , जिला लखनऊ , उ.प्र.

लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/ प्रक्रम सम्बद्ध भारतीय रद्द करने कीतिथि मानक का शीर्षक

5 4

17-02-2009 आईएस 1659 : 2004 ब्लाक बोर्ड्स

13-03-2009 आईएस 14543 : 2004 पैकेज्ड ड्रिंकिंग वाटर

( अदर देन पैकेज्ड नेचुरल मिनरल वाटर )

[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ]

पी. के. गम्भीर, उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर )

New Delhi , the 21st August, 2009

S. O. 2408. In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 5 ) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulation 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences of which are given below have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each : ( Period from 01-02-2009 to 30-06-2009 )

SCHEDULE

Name & Address of the Licencee Licence No. CM/L

Sl. No.

4 12

M/ s . Rama Polimers Pvt . Ltd. 19591906

Vi !! -Makra Trilochan Mahadev, Jaunpur -Varanasi Highway ,

P.O. Lahangpur . Distt : Jaunpur, U. P. M/ s . Aditi Enterprises

2 9668208

Vili -Sugamau, Near Kukrail Picnic Spot, Distt: Lucknow , Uttar Pradesh .

Date of Cancellation

Article/Process with relevent Indian Standard covered by The Licence cancelled/Suspension

17-02-2009

IS:1659: 2004 Block Boards

13-03-2009

IS: 14543 : 2004 Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Water)

[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ] P. K. GAMBHIR , Dy . Director (Marks) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

5085

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 21 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2409.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के नियम ( 4 ) के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए है , वे स्वीकृत कर दिये गए है :-

चालूतिथि अनुसूची

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

क्रम संख्या

लाइसेंस संख्या

(2)

(1 )

(3)

जून 2009

1. 3026033

26-05-2009 2. 3027136

29-05-2009 3. 3027237

29-05-2009 4. 3028340

02-06-2009 5. 3028441

05-06-2009 6. 3028845

10-06-2009 7. 3029645

12-06-2009 8. 3029746

09-06-2009 9. 3029847

11-06-2009 10. 3030428

16-06-2009 11. 3030529

16-06-2009 12. 3032028

23-06-2009

भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक व संबंधित भारतीय मानक (4)

(5)

398 ( भाग 1 ) : 1996 एएसी

मैसर्स आदिनाथ केबल्स एण्ड कण्डक्टर्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड , ई- 43-ए, रोड नं. 1बी, विश्वकर्मा औद्यौगिक क्षेत्र जयपुर- 302013 (राजस्थान)

1417: 1999 स्वर्णाभूषणों की हॉलमार्किंग

मैसर्स गोल्डन हैलो मल्टीट्रेड प्रा.लि. , दिव्य दीप मैरीज पैलेस के ऊपर , बजरंगढ़ चौराहा, अजमेर (राजस्थान )

मैसर्स खण्डेवाल ज्वैलर्स , 11-12 , तिलक मार्केट , अलवर ( राजस्थान)

1417: 1999 स्वर्णाभूषणों की हॉलमार्किंग

458: 2003 प्रीकास्ट कांक्रीट पाइप्स

मैसर्स श्रीनाथ सीमेन्ट वर्क्स , ए-60 , माही सरोवर नगर , हाउसिंह बोर्ड के पास , बांसवाड़ा - 327001 ( राजस्थान )

मैसर्स सन स्टार इण्डस्ट्रीज, जे-1120 , फेज III , सीतापुरा औद्यौगिक क्षेत्र , जयपुर (राजस्थान)

13779: 1999 एसी स्टेटिक वॉटऑवर मीटर

1786: 1995 एच एस डी स्टील बार्स

मैसर्स मंगला इस्पात ( जयपुर ) लि. , यूनिट- II, बी-234, रोड नं. 9 , विश्वकर्मा औद्यौगिक क्षेत्र जयपुर 302013 ( राजस्थान)

12269: 1987 53 ग्रेड, साधारण पोर्टलैण्ड सीमेन्ट

मैसर्स खारिया मिनरल्स एण्ड कैमीकल्स , जयपुर रोड, ग्राम : खारिया मीठापुर तहसील : बिलाड़ा जिला : जोधपुर ( राज. )

694: 1990 पीवीसी इनसुलेटेड केबल्स

मैसर्स डीलक्स केबल्स एण्ड वायर्स प्रा.लि. , जी 1-1276 एवं 1277 , फेज- III , सीतापुरा औद्यौगिक क्षेत्र , जयपुर ( राजस्थान )

458: 2003 प्रीकास्टकांक्रीट पाइप्स

मैसर्स त्रिवेदी स्पन पाइप्स, एफ - 124-125 , औद्यौगिक क्षेत्र, दोहद रोड , बांसवाड़ा- 327001 (राजस्थान)

मैसर्स प्रियू इण्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड, एसपी 1 / 33बी, रीको औद्यौगिक क्षेत्र , नीमराना, जिला : अलवर (राज.)

7098 ( भाग 1 ): 1988 क्रॉसलिंक्ड पोलीथिलीन इन्सुलेटेड पीवीसी केबल्स

694: 1990 पीवीसी इन्सुटेड केबल्स

मैसर्स श्री बालाजी केबल प्रोडक्ट्स, प्लाट नं. 17 लक्ष्मीनारायणपुरी , झोंटवाड़ा औद्यौगिक क्षेत्र , जयपुर 302013 ( राजस्थान)

398 ( भाग 2) : 1996 एसीएसआर

मैसर्स श्री नाथ केबल एण्ड कण्डक्टर्स, सी-953 , रोड नं. 14 , विश्वकर्मा औद्यौगिक क्षेत्र जयपुर 302013 ( राजस्थान) [PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 5, 2009 /BHADRA 14, 1931

5086

24-06-2009 3032735

13.

24-06-2009 3032836

14.

24-06-2009 3033535

15.

19-06-2009 3033232

16.

398 ( भाग 2): 1996

एसीएसआर

मैसर्स श्री अरिहन्त केबल्स , जी-845 ए, रोड नं. 14, विश्वकर्मा औद्यौगिक क्षेत्र , जयपुर 302 013 (राजस्थान )

398 ( भाग 4) : 1994 एएएसी

मैसर्स सत्य व्यापार निर्यात प्रा. लि. , ए-127 , रोड नं. 9 , विश्वकर्मा औद्यौगिक क्षेत्र, जयपुर-302 013 ( राजस्थान )

12427: 2001 हैक्सागन हैड ट्रांसमिशन टावर बोल्ट्स

मैसर्स सौंखिया फास्टनर्स प्रा. लि. , ए-336( बी ) , रोड नं. 17 , विश्वकर्मा औद्यौगिक क्षेत्र , जयपुर 302 013 (राज. )

694: 1990 पीवीसी इन्सुलेटेड केबल्स

मैसर्स अपार पावर केबल्स (प्रा. ) लि. , एफ-540 रोड नं. 1 डी, विश्वकर्मा औद्यौगिक क्षेत्र , जयपुर 302 013 (राजस्थान)

[सं. सी एम डी/13 : 11 ]

पी. के गम्भीर, उपमहानिदेशक ( मुहर )

New Delhi , the 21st August , 2009

S.O. 2409.-In pursuance of sub - regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification ) Regulations , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of which are given inthe following Schedule :-

OperativeDate Licence No.

(CM/L-)

Sl: No.

1 2

JUNE 2009

26-05-2009 3026033

29-05-2009 3027136

29-05-2009 3027237

02-06-2009 3028340

05-06-2009 3028441

SCHEDULE

Name and address of the Licensee Article/Process covered by the licences and the relevant IS: Designation

Adinath Cables & Conductors Priavate Limited E-43 A, Road No. 1B, Vishwakarma Industrial Area , Jaipur - 302013 Rajasthan

398 (Part 1) : 1996 Aluminium conductors for overhead transimission purposes: Part 1Aluminium stranded Conductors

1417: 1999

GoldenHello Multitrade Pvt . Ltd. , Above Divya Deep Marriage Palace , Bajrangarh Choraha , Ajmer

Gold andGold Alloys , JewelleryArtefacts- Fineness and Marking Khandelwal Jewellers 11-12 , Tilak Market Alwar Rajasthan

1417: 1999 Gold andGold Alloys , Jewellery Artefacts- Fineness and Marking Shreenath Cement Works A -60 , Mahi Sarovar, Nagar , Near Housing Board Banswara - 327001 Rajasthan

458:2003 Specification for Precast Concrete Pipes(with and without Reinforcement)

13779: 1999 ac Static Watthour Meters , Class1 and 2 -Sepecification SunStar Industries J - 1120 , Phase - 111 , Sitapura Industrial Area , Jaipur Rajasthan [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

3 6.

10-06-2009 3028845

7. 3029645

12-6-2009 8.

9-6-2009 3029746

11-6-2009 9. 3029847

10. 3030428

16-6-2009

16-6-2009 11. 3030529

23-6-2009 12. 3032028

24-6-2009 13. 3032735

24-6-2009 14. 3032836

24-6-2009 15. 3033535

19-6-2009 16. 3033232

5087

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

1786: 1985

Mangala Ispat (Jaipur) Ltd. , Unit - II , B-234 , Road No. 9, V.K. I. Area, Jaipur-302013 Rajasthan

Specification for high strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement

12269: 1987

Specification for 53 grade ordinary Portland Cement Kharia Minerals and Chemicals Jaipur Road, Village : Kharia Mithapure , Tehsil: Bilara Jodhpur Rajasthan

694: 1990

Deelux Cables and Wires Private Limited , G 1-1276 and 1277 , Phase - III , Sitapura Industrial Area , Jaipur Rajasthan

PVC Insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100V

458: 2003

Trivedi SpunPipes F - 124-125 , Industrial Area, Dohad Road, Banswara - 327001 Rajasthan

Specification for Precast Concrete Pipes(with and withoutReinforcement ) 7098 (Pt. 1) : 1988 Prew Industries Limited , SP 1/33B , RIICO Industrial Area, Alwar Neemrana Rajasthan

Crosslinked polyethylene insulated PVC sheathed cables: Part 1 For working voltage upto and including 1100V

694:1990

Shri Balaji Cable Products , Plot No. 17 , Laxminarayanpuri , Jhotwara Industrial Area, Jaipur- 302012, Rajasthan

PVC Insulated cables for including 1100 V working voltages upto and 398 (Pt. 2) : 1996 Shri Nath Cable and Conductors , C- 953 , Road No. 14, V.K. I. Area , Jaipur- 302013 , Rajasthan

Aluminium conductors for overhead transmission purposes: Part2 Aluminium conductors , galvanized steel reinforced 398 (Pt. 2) : 1996 Shree Arihant Cables , G - 845 A, Road No. 14 , V.K.I. Area, Jaipur- 302013 , Rajasthan

Aluminium conductors for overhead transmission purposes: Part 2 Aluminium conductors , galvanized steet reinforced Satya Vyapar Niryat Private Limited, A- 127 , Road No. 9 , Vishwakarma Industrial Area, Jaipur- 302013 , Rajasthan

398(Pt. 4): 1994 Aluminium conductors for overhead transmisssion purpose: Part 4 Aluminium alloy stranded conductors (aluminiummagnesium silicon type)

12427:2001

Sonkhia Fasteners Private Limited, A-336 ( B) , Road No. 17 , Vishwakarma Industrial Area , Jaipur-302013 (Rajasthan)

Fasteners- Threaded Steel Fasteners- Hexagon Head Transmission Tower Bolts- Specification 694:1990

ApparPower Cables (Pvt . ) Ltd. , F-540, Road No. ID , V.K.I. Area, Jaipur-302013 ( Raj . )

PVC Insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100 V

[No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ] P. K. GAMBHIR , Dy . Director General (Marks) 5088

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009/BHADRA 14 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 19 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2410. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम 1987 के नियम , 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वह स्थापित हो गया है :-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम संख्या

स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों , यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 1

28 फरवरी , 2009 भामा 5571 : 2009 जोखिमपूर्ण क्षेत्रों में विद्युत उपस्कर के चयन व संस्थापन की मार्गदर्शिका ( खानों को छोड़ कर ) (तीसरा पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदाबाद जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : ईटी 22/टी-4]

आर. के. त्रेहन , वैज्ञानिक ई एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी)

New Delhi , the 19th August , 2009

S.O. 2410.- In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued :-

SCHEDULE

No. and Year of the Indian Standards

Date of Established SI . No.

No. and Year of the Indian Standards , if any , Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(1)

(3)

(4) 1.

28th February, 2009 IS 5571 : 2009 Guide for Selection and Installation of Electrical Equipment in Hazardous Areas (Other than Mines ) (Third Revision)

Copies of this Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah Jafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore . Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna , Pune , Thiruvannthapuram.

[ Ref: ET 22/ T-4 ]

R. K. TREHAN, Sc. E and Head ( Elec . Tech . )

कोयला मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2411.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को प्रतीत होता है कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त किये जाने की संभावना है;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ;

5089

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाले रेखांक सं. ईसीएल/एसआईएम/एम.ओ.यू.जेड.ए. /एन.ओ.टी.आई. /05 तारीख 16 नवम्बर , 2008 , कानिरीक्षण उपायुक्त जिला पाकुड़ ( झारखण्ड ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 , काउंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता -700001 के कार्यालय में या निदेशक तकनीकी ( प्रचालन ) , ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड , सांकटोरिया , डाकघर- दिसेरगढ़ , जिला बर्द्धवान ( प. बंगाल ) पिन कोड 713333 के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाली भूमि में , हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चाटों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र के प्रकाशन की तारीख से नब्बे दिन के भीतर निदेशक तकनीकी ( प्रचालन ) , ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड सांकटोरिया , डाकघर- दिसेरगढ़ , जिला बर्द्धवान ( प. बंगाल ) पिन कोड-713333 को भेजेंगे ।

अनुसूची

सिमलौंग कोल माइनिंग ब्लॉक

जिलाः पाकुड़; झारखंड

(रेखांक सं. ईसीएल/एसआईएम/एम.ओ.यू.जेड.ए. /एन.ओ.टी.आई./ 05 तारीख 16 नवम्बर , 2008 )

टिप्पण

एकड़ में क्षेत्र

हेक्टर में क्षेत्र

जिला

ग्राम संख्या

थाना

मौजा/गाँव

क्रम सं.

भाग

16.220

6.564

पाकुड़

सिमलौंग पहाड़ लिट्टी-पाड़ा

भाग

1.940

0.785

पाकुड़

लिट्टी-पाड़ा

बड़ा घाघरी

18.160

7,349

कुल क्षेत्र

एकड़

हेक्टर

(लगभग)

सीमा विवरण

क- क 1 यह रेखा लिट्टी पाड़ा, जिला पाकुड के मौजा- सिमलौंग नं.-05, की खसरा नं. 99 एवं 119 की साझा पर सीमा बिन्दु क से शुरू होकर , खसरा सं. 118 की उत्तरी पूर्वी सीमा , खसरा सं. 117 की पूर्वी सीमा , खसरा सं. 116 , 113 की उत्तरी सीमा से गुजरती हुई खसरा सं. 112 को पार करती हुई पुनः खसरा सं. 127 , 128 , 129 , 145 , की उत्तरी सीमा से गुजरती हुई खसरा सं. 145 की उत्तरी - पूर्वी सीमा पर बिन्दु क 1 पर मिलती है ।

क 1 - क 2 यह रेखा मौजा सिमलौंग सं. -05 की खसरा सं. 145 उत्तरी सीमा पर बिन्दु क 1 से शुरू होकर , खसरा सं. 145 , 147 की पूर्वी सीमा से गुजरती हुई , खसरा सं. 172 , 183 को पार करती हुई , खसरा सं. 184 - उत्तरी सीमा से गुजरती हुई मौजा- सिमलौंग पहाड़ सं. -05 एवं बड़ा घाघरी सं. 20 साझा सीमा पर बिन्दु क 2 पर मिलती है ।

क 2- क 3 यह रेखा सिमलौंग पहाड़ सं. 05 एवं बडा घाघरी सं. 20 साझा सीमा पर बिन्दु क 2 से शुरू होकर , खसरा सं 82 उत्तरी सीमा , खसरा सं 7 की पूर्वी एवं दक्षिणी सीमा , खसरा सं. 8 एवं 3 की दक्षिणी सीमा से गुजरती हुई , बड़ा घाघरी सं. -20 की खसरा सं.3 एवं 91 की साझा सीमा पर बिन्दु क 3 पर मिलती है ।

क 3 क यह रेखा मौजा बड़ा घाघरी सं.20 की खसरा सं. 03 एवं 91 की साझा सीमा पर बिन्दु क 3 से शुरू होकर , खसरा सं. - 3 , 2 मौजा बड़ा घाघरी सं. 20 , मौजा बड़ा घाघरी सं. 20 तथा मौजा सिमलौंग पहाड़ सं. 5 की साझा सीमा को पार करती हुई , मौजा सिमलौंग पहाड़ सं. 05 की खसरा सं. 180 , 178 , 175 , 173 , 172 , 104 , 118 , 99 को पार करती हुई खसरा सं. 99 एवं 119 की साझा सीमा पर बिन्दु क पर मिलती है ।

[फा. सं. 43015/1/2009-पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]

एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi , the 28th August , 2009

S.O. 2411. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the locality mentioned in Schedule hereto annexed:

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisitions and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957 ) , ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein;

3056 GI/ 2009-4 5090

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009/BHADRA 14, 1931

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] The Planbearing number ECL/SIM/MOUZA/NOTI/05 dated the 16th November , 2008 of the area covered by this notification can be inspected in the office of the Deputy Commissioner , District Pakur (Jharkhand ) , or in the office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street, Kolkata - 700 001 or in the office of the Director Technical (Operation) , Eastern Coalfieds Limited, Sanctoria, P.O. Dishergarh, Dist.- Burdwan ( West Bengal ) , Pin Code -713 333 .

All persons interested in the land covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , charts and other documents referred in sub -section ( 7 ) of Section 13 of the said Act to the Director Technical ( Operation ) , Eastern Coalfields Limited, Sanctoria , P.O. Dishergarh , Dist.- Burdwan ( West Bengal) , Pin Code - 713 333 ; within ninety (90) days from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette .

SCHEDULE

Simlong Coal MiningBlock

District: Pakur; Jharkhand

(Plannumber : ECL/ SIM/MOUZA/NOTI /05 dated the 16th November , 2008)

Thana

District

Remarks SI . No.

Village Number

Mouza/ Village

Area in hectares

Area in acres

Simlong Pahar

Pakur

6.564

Litipara

16.220

Part 2.

Pakur

Bara Ghaghari Litipara

0.785

1.940

Part TotalArea

7.349 hectares (approx- imately)

18.160 acres (approx- imately)

Boundary Description

A-A 1 Line starts from Point A on the common boundary of plot No. 99 & 19 in the Mouza Simlong No.-05 Thana Liliti Para dist-Pakur , passes through the northern and eastern boundary of plot No.118 , eastern boundary plot No. 117 , northern boundary of plot No. 116, 113 , cross the plot No.112 , again passes through the nothern bounday of plot No. 127, 128 , 129, 145 and meets at point Al on the northern boundary of plot No. 145 of Mouza Simlong Pahar No.05 .

A1 -A2 Line starts from Point Al on the northern boundary ofplot No. 145 , of Mouza Simlong Pahar No. 05 and passes through the eastern boundary ofplot No. 145, 147, northern boundary of 170 , eastern boundary of plot No. 170 , 171, cross the plot No. 172 , 183 , passes through northern boundary of plot no. 184 and meets at the point A 2 on the common boundary of Mouza Simlong Pahar No. 05 and Bara Ghaghari No 20 .

A2- A3 Line starts from Point A2 on the common boundary of Mouza Simlong Pahar No. 05 and Bara Ghaghari No. 20 and passess through northern boundary of plot No. 82 , eastern and southern boundary of plot No. 7 , southern boundary of plot No. 8 , 3 and meets at point A3 of the common boundary of plot No. 3 and 91 of Mouza Bara Ghaghari No. 20.

A3-A Line starts from Point A3 of the common boundary ofplot No.3 and 91 of Mouza Bara Ghaghari No. 20. Crosses plot No. 3 , 2 of Mouza -Bara Ghaghari No. 20 , common boundary Mouza Bara Ghaghari No. 20 and Simlong pahar No. 05, plot No. 180, 178 , 175 , 173 , 172, 104, 105 , 118, 99 and meets at the point A on the common boundary ofplot No. 99 and 119 of Mouza Simlong Pahar No. 05.

[F. No. 43015/1 /2009- PRIW - 1 ] M. SHAHABUDEEN . Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 28 अगस्त , 2009

का.आ. 2412.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है, कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में से कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है;

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले रेखांक सं. सी -1 ( ई ) III /जेजेआर/784-0409 , तारीख 27 अप्रैल , 2009 का निरीक्षण , वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व विभाग ) , कोल इस्टेट, सिविल लाइन्स , नागपुर -440 001 ( महाराष्ट्र) के कार्यालय में या मुख्य महाप्रबंधक ( एक्सप्लोरेशन ) , केन्द्रीय खान योजना और डिजाइन संस्थान , गोंडवाना प्लेस , कांके रोड, राँची के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, । , काऊंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता के कार्यालय में या जिला कलेक्टर , यवतमाल (महाराष्ट्र ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है । 5091 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाली भूमि में, हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चार्टों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से 90 दिनों के भीतर मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , वणी क्षेत्र, ऊर्जा ग्राम , पोस्टतडाली , तहसील चंद्रपुर जिला चंद्रपुर 442 406 ( महाराष्ट्र ) या वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड, राजस्व विभाग , कोल इस्टेट , सिविल लाइन्स, नागपुर - 440 001 ( महाराष्ट्र ) को भेजेंगे ।

अनुसूची

कोलगांव ओपनकास्ट प्रोजेक्ट

वणी क्षेत्र

जिला यवतमाल ( महाराष्ट्र)

[ रेखांक सं. सी -1 ( ई ) III /जेजेआर/784-0409 , तारीख 27 अप्रैल , 2009 ]

क्रम संख्या ग्राम का नाम

पटवारी सर्कल संख्या

जिला

तहसील

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टर में टिप्पणी 1

चिखली

वणी

109

यवतमाल

भाग

51.42

कुल क्षेत्र : 51.42 हेक्टर ( लगभग )

या 127.05 एकड ( लगभग )

सीमा वर्णन: -

क-ख- ग- घ- ड़ : रेखा ग्राम चिखली में बिन्दु 'क ' से आरम्भ होती है और बिन्दु "ख " , "ग " और "घ " से जाती हुई विद्यमान कोलगांव ओपनकास्ट प्रोजेक्ट की अधिसूचित सीमा के साथ- साथ जाती है और बिन्दु "ड़ " पर मिलती है ।

ङ-च-छ-ज : रेखा सड़क के साथ- साथ जाती है और ग्राम चिखली और ग्राम येनक की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा के साथ जाती है और बिन्दु "च" और "छ " से होती हुई बिन्दु "ज " पर मिलती है ।

ज-झ-ज- ट-क; रेखा ग्राम चिखली और ग्राम येनक की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा से जाती है फिर विद्यमान कोलगांव ओपनकास्ट प्रोजेक्ट की अधिसूचित सीमा से होकर जाती है और बिन्दु " झ " , "ञ " और "ट " से जाती है और आरंभिक बिन्दु ' क ' पर मिलती है ।

[फा. सं. 43015/ 18 /2009- पीआरआई डब्ल्यू-1 ]

एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 28th August , 2009

S.O. 2412. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that Coal is likely to be obtained fron the lands in the locality mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957) , ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein;

The plan bearing number C- 1 (E ) III /JJR/ 784-0409 dated the 27th April , 2009 of the area covered by this notification can be inspected in the ofiice of the Western Coalfields Limited (Revenue Department) , Coal Estate , Civil Lines , Nagpur -440 001 (Maharashtra) or at the office of the Chief General Manager ( Exploration Division) ,Central Mine Planning andDesign Institute , Gondwana Place , Kanke Road , Ranchi or at the office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street, Kolkata or at the office of the District Collector , Yavatmal ( Maharashtra) .

All persons interested in the lands covered by this notification shall deliver all maps, charis and other documents referred to in sub - section ( 7) of Section 13 of the said Act to the office of the Chief General Manager, Western Coalfields Limited, Wani Area, Urjagram , Post Tadali , Tahsil Chandrapur , District Chandrapur - 442 406 ( Maharashtra ) or Chief Mining Engineer ( Land and Revenue ) , Western Coalfields Limited , ( Revenue Department) Coal Estate , Civil Lines , Nagpur - 440 001 ( Maharashtra ) within ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette .

5092

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009/BHADRA 14, 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

KOLGAON OPENCAST PROJECT

WANI AREA

DISTRICT YAVATMAL (MAHARASHTRA)

[Planbearing number C- 1 ( E) III/ JJR/ 784-0409 dated the 27th April, 2009]

Patwari circle number

Tehsil

SI No. Name of village

District

Remarks

Area in hectares

1 Chikhali

109

Wani

Yavatmal

51.42

Part

Total area: 51.42 hectares ( approximately)

127.05 acres (approximately) Boundary description :-

A-B-C-D- E : Line starts from Point ' A ' in village Chikhali and passes nearby Point ' B ' , ' C ' and ' D ' along the Existing Notified Area for Kolgaon Opencast Project and meets at Point ' E' .

E- F-G-11 : Line passes along the Road and passes nearby Point ' F ' , ' G ' and meets on common village boundary of villages Chikhali and Yenak at Point 'H' .

H-I -J - K- A: Line passes along the common village boundary of villages Chikhali and Yenak, then passes nearby Point ' I ' , ' J ' and ' K ' along the Existing Notified Area for Kolgaon Opencast Project and meets at starting Point 'A`

[F.No. 43015/18/2009 - PRIW - I ] M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 28 अगस्त, 2009

का. आ. 2413. केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार में कोयला मंत्रालय के द्वारा जारी की गई अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 3261 तारीख । नवम्बर , 2007 तदोपरांत शुद्धिपत्र संख्या का.आ. 1736 तारीख 9 जुलाई, 2008 जो भारत के राजपत्र के भाग 11 , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii) तारीख 10 नवम्बर , 2007 और 12 जुलाई 2008 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका माप 35.00 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 86.48 एकड़ ( लगभग ) है, कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दीथी;

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त है;

अतः केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 29.287 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 72.37 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप की उक्त भूमि का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ;

टिप्पण 1 इस अधिसूचना के अधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. एसईसीएल/ बी.एस.पी./जी.एम. ( पीएलजी )/लैंड /342 तारीख 25-05-2009 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर , जिला रायगढ़ ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट कोलकाता- 700001 के कार्यालय में या साउथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड, ( राजस्व अनुभाग ) सीपत रोड़ बिलासपुर- 495001 (छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

टिप्पण 2 कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है , जिसमें निम्नलिखित उपबंध है : -

अर्जन के बाबत आपत्तियां :

" 8( 1 ) कोई व्यक्ति जो किसी भूमि में जिसकी बाबत धारा 7 के अधीन अधिसूचना निकाली गई है , हितबद्ध है अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्हीं अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के बारे में आपत्ति कर सकेगा । 5093 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/ भाद्र 14, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

स्पष्टीकरण :

(1) इस धारा के अंतर्गत यह आपत्ति नहीं मानी जाएगी कि कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वंय खनन संक्रियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संक्रियाएं केन्द्रीय सरकार या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नहीं करनी चाहिए ।

(2) उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन प्रत्येक आपत्ति सक्षम अधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जाएगी और सक्षम अधिकारी आपत्तिकर्ता को स्वंय सुने जाने , विधि व्यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपत्तियों को सुनने के पश्चात् और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जांच यदि कोई हो , करने के पश्चात् जो वह आवश्यक समझता है , वह या तो धारा 7 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि का या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध मे एक रिपोर्ट या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़े या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आपत्तियों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार को उसके विनिश्चय के लिए देगा ।

(3)

इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबद्ध समझा जाएगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होगा , यदि भूमि या किसी ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर लिए जाते हैं । " टिप्पण 3: केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता-700001 को उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 905 , तारीख 20 मार्च , 1987 द्वारा सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियुक्त किया है ।

अनुसूची

बिजारी विवत खान का विस्तार , मांड रायगढ़ कोयला क्षेत्र , रायगढ़ क्षेत्र

जिला-रायगढ़ ( छत्तीसगढ़ )

[ रेखांक सं. - एसईसीएल/बी.एस.पी./जी.एम. ( पीएलजी )/लैंड/342 तारीख 25-05-2009 ]

सभी अधिकारः-

(क) राजस्व भूमि:

टिप्पण

क्षेत्र हेक्टर में

जिला

तहसील

बंदोबस्त नम्बर

पटवारी हल्का नम्बर

ग्राम का नाम

क्रम संख्या

भाग

29.287

275

रायगढ़

रुमकेरा

घड़घोड़ा

कुल: 29.287 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 72.37 एकड़ ( लगभग )

1. ग्राम बिजारी ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या:

24/1, 26 से 32 , 33/1 से 33/4 , 34 से 37 , 88 ( भाग ) , 120/1 ( भाग ) , 125 , 126 , 127 .

सीमा वर्णन :

क-ख- रेखा बिन्दु " क " से आरंभ होती है और ग्राम रुमकेरा बिजारी के सम्मिलित सीमा से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " ख " पर मिलती है । ख-ग रेखा ग्राम रुमकेरा - पोरडा के भागतः सम्मिलित सीमा से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु ' ग ' पर मिलती है ।

ग-घ रेखा ग्राम रुमकेरा के प्लाट संख्या 127 के दक्षिणी और 120/1 से होकर प्लाट संख्या 126 , 125 के दक्षिणी तथा प्लाट संख्या 88 से गुजरती है उसके बाद प्लाट संख्या 37 , 34 , 33/2 , 33/3 , 33/4 , 26 , 24/1 , 26 के दक्षिणी सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " घ " पर मिलती है ।

घ-क रेखा ग्राम रुमकेरा - बिजारी के भागतः सम्मिलित सीमा से गुजरती हुई आरंभिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है ।

[फा. सं. 43015/5/2007- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]

एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 28th August , 2009

S.O. 2413.-Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 3261 dated 1stNovember , 2007 and subsequent corrigendum number S.O. 1736 dated the 9th July, 2008 issued under sub - section ( 1 ) ofSection 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act , 1957 ( 20 of 1957 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the saidAct) and published in the Gazette of India, Part II , Section 3 , sub - section ( ii ) dated 10th November , 2007 and 12th July , 2008 respectively, the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 35.000 hectares (approximately ) or 86.48 acres (approximately ) of the lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification;

5094

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009/ BHADRA 14, 1931

[ PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii )] And whereas the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands prescribed in the Schedule appended to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act , 1957 , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the land measuring 29.287 hectares ( approximately) or 72.37 acres ( approximately ) as All Rights in or over the said lands described in the Schedule appended hereto;

Note 1. The plan bearing number SECL / BSP / GM ( PLG )/ LAND/ 342 dated the 25th May , 2009 of the area coveredby this notification may be inspected in the office of the Collector , Raigarh ( Chhattisgarh ) or in the office of the Coal Controller, 1. Council House Street , Kolkata - 700001 or in the office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited (Revenue Section ) , Seepat Road , Bilaspur -495006 (Chhattisgarh) .

Note 2. Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of Section 8 of the said Act which provides as follows:-

Objection to Acquisition:

"8(1 ) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under Section 7 has been issued , may , within thirty days of the issue of the notification, object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or any rights in or over such land.

Explanation:

(1) It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operation in the land for the production of coal and that such operation should not be undertaken bythe Central Government or by any other person .

(2) Every objection under sub - section ( 1 ) shall be made to the competent authority in writing , and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall , after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry, if any , as he thinks necessary , either makes a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 or of rights in or over such land , or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land, to the Central Government, containing his recommendations on the objections , together with the record of the proceedings held by him , for the decision of the Government .

(3) For the purposes of this section , a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act . " Note3. The Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street . Kolkata - 700001 , has been appointed by the Central Government as the competent authority under Section 3 of the said Act, vide notification number S. O. 905 , dated the 20th March , 1987, published in Part II , Section 3 , sub - section ( ii ) of the Gazette of India , dated the 4th April , 1987.

SCHEDULE

Extension of Bijari OCM , Raigarh Area, Distt. - Raigarh ( Chhattisgarh)

[Plan bearing number SECL/BSP /GM ( PLG )/LAND/ 342 , dated the 25th May, 20091

All Rights:

( A) REVENUE LAND

Tahsil

District

Remarks Serial Number

Settlement Number

Name of village

Area in Hectares

Patwari halka Number

Rumkera

275

29.287

Part

Garghoda Raigarh

Total : - 29.287 hectares (Approximately) or 72.37 Acres ( approximately)

1. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Rumkera( Part): 24/1,26 to 32,33/ 1 to 33/4, 34 to 37 , 88 (P ), 120/1 (P), 125, 126, 127 .

5095

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/ भाद्र 14, 1931

[भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Boundary Description:

A-B Line starts from point " A" and passes along the common boundary of villages Rumkera - Bijari and meets at point "B" .

B-C Line passes along partly common boundary of villages Rumkera - Porda and meets at point "C" " .

C-D Line passes in village Rumkera along southern boundary of plot number 127 , through 120/1 , southern boundary of 126, 125, through 88 , southern boundary of 37 , 34 , 33/2, 33/3 , 33/4 , 26 , 24/1 , 26 and meets at point " D " .

DA Line passes along the partly common boundary of villages Rumkera - Bijari and meets at starting point " A" .

[No. 43015/5/2007- PRIW - 1 ] M. SAHABUDEEN , Under Secy .

अनुसूची

नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त , 2009

आई.बी. ब्लॉक XIII ( तालाबीरा -11 )

तालाबीरा क्षेत्र, जिलाः सम्बलपुर , ओड़िशा

सभी अधिकार

(रेखांक सं. एमसीएल /एसयूआर/ टीएएलबी/03/2008 , तारीख 12 जुलाई, 2008 )

टिप्पणी

गांव

कुल

तहसील/ जिला

क्र. मौजा/

हेक्टर

थाना

सं.

सं. ग्राम का

में

नाम

(भाग)

331.465

संबलपुर

तालाबीरा

रेंगाली/ कतरबगा

का.आ. 2414.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 7 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1026 , तारीख 08 मई , 2008 और जो भारत के राजपत्र भाग II , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) , तारीख 10 मई 2008 में प्रकाशित की गई थी तथा मूल अधिसूचना के संशोधन द्वारा का.आ. संख्या 2354, तारीख 18 अगस्त , 2008 और भारत के राजपत्र असाधारण , भाग II , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) , तारीख 23 अगस्त, 2008 में प्रकाशित उस अधिसूचना में संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि और परिक्षेत्र के सभी अधिकारों के अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी ।

52.428 (भाग)

रेंगाली/ संबलपुर

खिंडा

कतरबगा

कुल

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

383,893 हेक्टर

कुल 383.893 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 948.600 एकड़ ( लगभग )

1. तालाबीरा ग्राम ( भाग ) में अर्जित प्लाट संख्यांकः

1 ( भा ) , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , और केन्द्रीय सरकार का, पूर्वोक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और ओड़िशा सरकार से परामर्श करने के पश्चात्, यह समाधान हो गया है कि सलंग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 383.893 हेक्टर (लगभग ) या 948.600 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि के सभी अधिकार अर्जित किए जाने चाहिए ।

19 ( भा ) , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24, 25 , 26, 27 ( भा) , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ,

32, 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40, 41 , 42, 43 , 44, 45,46 ,

47,48( भा) , 124, 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136, 137 ,

138, 139 , 140 , 141 , 142, 143 , 144 , 145, 146 , 147 , 148 ,

149 , 150 , 151 , 152 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 ,

160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 167 , 168 , 169 , 170 , अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि अनुसूची में यथा वर्णित 383.893 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 948.600 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि और ऐसी भूमि के सभी अधिकार अर्जित किए जाते हैं ।

171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 ,

182, 183 , 184 , 185 , 186 , 187 , 188 , 189 , 190 , 191 , 192 ,

193, 194, 195 , 196 , 197 , 198 , 199 , 200 , 201 , 202 , 203 ,

204, 205 , 206 , 207 , 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 ,

220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 ,

215, 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 ,

231 , 232 , 233 , 234 , 235 , 236 ,

226, 227 , 228 , 229 , 230 ,

246, 247,

245 ,

244,

243 ,

242,

239 , 240 , 241 ,

237, 238 ,

257 , 258 ,

, 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 256 ,

248, 249 , 250 , 251

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेंखाक सं. एमसीएल//एसयूआर/टीएएलबी/03/ 2008 , तारीख 12 जुलाई , 2008 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर संबलपुर ( ओड़िशा ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , । , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता, पिन -700 001 के कार्यालय में या महाप्रबंधक ( एल/आर. एण्ड आर. ) , महानदी कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( भू- राजस्व और पुर्नवास विभाग ) , जागृति बिहार, डाकघर- जागृति विहार , बुर्ला , सम्बलपुर , उड़ीसा पिन-768020 के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है । 5096

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009 /BHADRA 14 , 1931

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264 , 265 , 266 , 267 , 268 , 269 , 1979 , 1980 , 1981 , 1982 , 2019 , 2020( भा) , 2089, 2090 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276 , 277 , 278 , 279 , 280 , 2091, 2092, 2093 , 2094 , 2095 , 2096 , 2097 , 2098 , 2099 , 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285 , 286 , 287 , 288 , 289 , 290 , 291 , 2100 , 2101 , 2102 , 2103 , 2104 , 2105 , 2106 , 2107 , 2108 ,

2109 , 2110 , 2111 , 2112 , 2113 , 2114 , 2115 , 2116 , 2117 ,

2118 , 2119 , 2121 ,

2120 , 2122 , 2123 , 2124 , 2125 , 2126 ,

2127 , 2128 , 2129 , 2130 , 2131 , 2132 , 2133 , 2134 , 2135 ,

2136 , 2137 , 2138 , 2139 , 2140 , 2141 , 2142 , 2146 , 2147 ,

2148, 2149 ( भा ) , 2150 , 2151 , 2152 , 2153 , 2154 , 2155 ,

2156 , 2157 , 2158 , 2159 , 2160 , 2161 , 2162 , 2163 , 2164 ,

2165 , 2166 , 2167 , 2168 , 2169 , 2170 , 2171 , 2172 , 2173 ,

2174 , 2175 , 2176 , 2177 , 2178 , 2179 , 2180 , 2181 , 2182 ,

2183 , 2184 , 2185 , 2186 , 2187 , 2188 , 2189 , 2190 , 2191 ,

2192, 2193 , 2194 , 2195 , 2196 , 2197 , 2198 , 2199 , 2200 ,

2201 , 2202 , 2203 , 2204 , 2205 , 2206 , 2207 , 2208 , 2209 ,

2210 , 2211 2212 , 2213 , 2214 , 2215 , 2216 , 2217 , 2218 ,

2219 , 2220 , 2221 , 2222 , 2223 , 2224 , 2225 , 2226 , 2227 ,

2228 , 2229 , 2230 , 2231 , 2232 , 2234, 2237 ( भा) , 2238 ,

2239 , 2240 , 2241 , 2242 , 2243 , 2244 , 2245 , 2246 , 2247 ,

2248 , 2249 , 2250 , 2251 , 2252 , 2253 , 2254 , 2255 , 2256

2257, 2258 , 2259 , 2260 , 2261 2262 , 2263 , 2264 , 2265 , 501 , 502 , 503 , 504 , 505 , 506 , 507 , 508 , 509 , 510 , 511 ,

2266, 2267 , 2268 , 2269 , 2270 , 2271 , 2272 , 2273 , 2274 ,

2275 , 2276 , 2277 , 2278 , 2279 , 2280 , 2281 , 2282 , 2283 ,

2284, 2285 , 2286 , 2287 , 2288 , 2289 , 2290 , 2291 , 2292 ,

2293 , 2294 , 2295 , 2296 ,

2301 ,

2297 , 2298 , 2299 , 2300 ,

2303 , 2304 , 2305 ,

2302,

2306 , 2307 , 2308 , 2309 , 2310 , 556 , 557 , 558 , 559 , 560 , 561 , 562 , 563 , 564 , 565 , 566 ,

2311 , 2312 , 2313 , 2314 , 2315 , 2316 , 2317 , 2318 , 2319 ,

2320 , 2321 , 2322 , 2323 , 2324, 2325 , 2326 , 2327 , 2328 ,

2329 , 2330 , 2331 , 2332 , 2333 , 2334 , 2335 , 2336 , 2337 ,

2338 , 2339 , 2340 , 2341 , 2342 , 2343 , 2344 , 2345 , 2346 , 610, 611 , 612 , 613 , 614 , 615 , 616 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 ,

2347, 2348 , 2349 , 2350 , 2351 , 2352 , 2353 , 2354 , 2355 ,

2358 , 2359 , 2360 , 2361 , 2362 , 2363 ,

2356, 2357 ,

2364 ,

2365, 2366 , 2367 , 2368 , 2369 , 2370 , 2371 , 2372 , 2373 , 643 , 644 , 645 , 646 , 647 , 648 , 649 , 650 , 651 , 652,653 ,

2374, 2375 , 2376 , 2377 , 2378 , 2379 , 2380 , 2381 , 2382 ,

2383, 2384, 2385 , 2386 , 2387 , 2388 , 2389 , 2390 , 2391 , 665 , 666 , 667 , 668 , 669 , 670 , 671 , 672 , 673 , 674 , 675 ,

2392, 2393 , 2394 , 2395 , 2396 , 2397 , 2398 , 2399 ,, 2400 ,

2401 , 2402 , 2403 , 2404 , 2405 , 2406 , 2407 , 2408 , 2409 , 292,293,294 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302 , 303, 304 , 305 , 306 , 307 , 308 , 309 , 310 , 311 , 312 , 313 , 314 , 315 , 316 , 317 , 318 , 319 , 320 , 321 , 322 , 323 , 324, 325, 326 , 327 , 328 , 329 , 330 , 331 , 332 , 333 , 334 , 335 , 336, 337 , 338 , 339 , 340 , 341 , 342 , 343 , 344 , 345 , 346 , 347, 348 , 349 , 350 , 351 , 352 , 353 , 354 , 355 , 356, 357 , 358 , 359 , 360 , 361 , 362 , 363 , 364 , 365 , 366 , 367 , 368 , 369 , 370 , 371 , 372 , 373 , 374 , 375 , 376 , 377 , 378 , 379 , 380 , 381 , 382 , 383 , 384 , 385 , 386( भा ) , 387, 388 , 389( भा) , 392( भा ) , 393, 394 , 395 , 396 , 397 , 398 , 399 , 400 , 401 , 402, 403 , 404, 405 , 406 , 407 , 408 , 409 , 410 , 411 , 412 , 413, 414 , 438( भा ) , 439 , 440 , 441 , 442 , 443 , 444, 445 , 446, 447, 448 , 449 , 450 , 451 , 452 , 453 , 454 , 455 , 456, 457, 458 , 459 , 460 , 461 , 462, 463 , 464 , 465 , 466, 467, 468, 469, 470 , 471 , 472 , 473 , 474 , 475 , 476 , 477 , 478 , 479, 480 , 481 , 482 , 483 , 484 , 485 , 486, 487 , 488 , 489 , 490, 491 , 492 , 493 , 494, 495 , 496 , 497 , 498 , 499 , 500 , 512, 513 , 514 , 515 , 516 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 , 522 , 523, 524, 525 , 526 , 527 , 528 , 529 , 530 , 531 , 532, 533 , 534, 535 , 536 , 537 , 538 , 539 , 540 , 541 , 542 , 543 , 544 , 545, 546 , 547 , 548 , 549 , 550 , 551 , 552 , 553 , 554 , 555 , 567, 568 , 569 , 570 , 571 , 572 , 573 , 574 , 575 , 576 , 577 , 578 , 579 , 580 , 581 , 592 ( भा ) , 593 , 595 , 596 , 597 , 598 , 599 , 600 , 601 , 602 , 603 , 604 , 605 , 606 , 607 , 608 , 609 , 621 , 622, 623 , 624, 625 , 626, 627 , 628 , 629 , 630 , 631 , 632, 633 , 634 , 635 , 636 , 637 , 638 , 639 , 640 , 641 , 642 , 654, 655 , 656 , 657 , 658 , 659 , 660 , 661 , 662 , 663 , 664 , 676, 677, 678 , 679 , 680 , 681 , 682 , 683 , 684 , 685 , 686 , 687 , 688 , 689 ( भा) , 690( भा) , 691 , 692 , 693 , 694 , 695 ,

2418 ,

2410, 2411 , 2412 , 2413 , 2414 , 2415 , 2416 , 2417 , 696, 697 , 698 , 699 , 700 , 701 , 702, 703 ( भा ) , 704 ( भा) ,

2419 , 2420 , 2421 , 2422 , 2423 , 2424 , 2425 , 2426 , 2427 , 966 , 967 , 968 , 969 , 970 , 971 , 972 , 973 , 974 , 975 , 976 ,

2428 , 2429 , 2430 , 2431 , 2432 , 2434 , 2435 , 2436 , 2437 , 977 , 978 , 979 , 980 , 981 , 982 , 983 , 984 , 985 , 986 , 987 ,

2438 ( भा) , 2439 ( भा) , 2440 ( भा) , 2443 , 2444, 2445 , 2446, 988 , 989 , 990 , 991 , 992 , 993 , 994 , 995 , 996 , 997 , 998 ,

2447, 2448 , 2449 , 2450 , 2451 , 2452 , 2453 , 2454 , 2455 , 999 , 1000 , 1001 , 1002 , 1003 , 1004 , 1005 , 1006 , 1007 ,

2456( भा) , 2461 ( भा) , 2462 ( भा ) , 2463 ( भा ) , 2464 , 2465 , 1008 , 1009 , 1010 , 1011 , 1012 , 1013 , 1014 , 1015 ( भा) ,

2466, 2467 , 2468( भा) , 2469, 2470 , 2471 ( भा ) , 2472 ( भा ) , 1017 ( भा) , 1018 , 1019,1020 , 1021 , 1022 , 1023 , 1024 , 1025 ,

2473, 2251/2474 , 2194/2475 , 2189/2476 , 474/2477,215/2478 , 1026 , 1027 , 1028 , 1029 , 1030 , 1031 , 1032 , 1033 , 1034 ,

215/2479 2203/2485 ,

, 208/2480 , 471/2481 , 243/2484 ,

1035 , 1041 ( भा ) , 1042 ( भा ) , 1043 ( भा) , 1965, 1968 , 1969 ,

2203/2486 , 2187/2487 , 2195/2491 , 2195/2492 , 2195/2493 , 1972 , 1973 , 1975 , 1977 , 1978 ,

1970 , 1971 ,

1974 , 1976 , 5097 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/भाद्र 14, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1378 , 1379 , 1380 , 1381 , 1382,1383 , 1384, 1385 , 1386 ( भा ) , 1387 , 1388 , 1389 , 1390, 1391 , 1392, 1393 , 1394 ( भा ) , 1395, 1396, 1398 ( भा ) , 1400 , 1401 , 1402 , 1403 , 678/2214 , 682/2215 , 699/2216 , 705/2217 , 734/2218 , 736/2219 , 689/2220 , 582/2227 , 687/2235 , 783/2241 , 1100/2247 , 1394/2262 , 1394/2263 , 1394/2264 , 1394/2265 , 1394/2266,1394/2267( भा) , 681/2275 , 681/2276, 746/2304 , 577/2335 , 577/2336 , 577/2337 , 583/2338 , 583/2339 , 585/2340 , 672/2341 , 693/2342, 751/2343 , 782/2348 ( भा ) , 1388/2407 , 1395/2408 , 1444/2409 ( भा) , एवं 693/2432

आई.बी. ब्लॉक XIII ( तालाबीरा- H ) का सीमा वर्णनः

क से चः- रेखा तालाबीरा प्लाट संख्या 16 के उत्तर पश्चिम किनारे से ग्राम तालाबीरा और पत्रापाली की सम्मिलित सीमा पर बिन्दु-क से प्रारंभ होती है फिर बिन्दु- क-1 तक तालाबीरा और पत्रापाली ग्राम की सम्मिलित सीमा से उत्तर की ओर चलती है फिर पूरब की ओर मुड़कर तालाबीरा प्लाट संख्या 1,389,386,389,392,2503,2505,438 से होते हुए बिन्दु- च तक पहुँचती है ।

242/2494,405/2502, 414/2503 ( भा) , 416/2505 ( भा ) , 384/2506 , 244/2507 , 244/2508 , 2186/2509 , 2186/2510 , 2185/2511 , 2185/2512 , 2185/2513 , 147/2522 , 2203/2531 , 501/2532 , 659/2533 , 659/2534 , 2444/2543 , 2421/2546, 2405/2547 , 2399/2548 , 2399/2549 , 2399/2550 , 2399/2551 , 2399/2552 , 2399/2553, 704/2556 , 136/2558 , 180/2559 , 3/2560 , 2156/2584, 2133/2585 , 2111/2586 , 2020/2587 , 2020/2588 , 2104/2593 , 2089/2595, 578/2598 , 2412 /,2599 , 254/2604 , 254/2605 , 255/2606 , 2443/2665 , 2443/2666 , 2190/2674 , 2190/2675 , 2454/2676 , 2454/2677 , 2390/2678 , 2390/2679 , 997/2684 , 1007/2685 , 2234/2687 , 2234/2688 , 987/2697 , 655/2704 , 2265/2708 , 2267/2709 , 2267/2710 , 2266/2711 , 2264/2712 , 185/2713 , 185/2714 , 185/2715 , 214/2716 , 216/2717 , 228/2718 239/2719 , 239/2720 , 242/2721 , 242/2722 , 242/2723 , 455/2724 , 520/2725 , 520/2726 , 520/2727 , 520/2728 , 521/2729 , 522/2730 , 600/2731 , 625/2732 , 625/2733 , 653/2734, 654/2735 , 986/2738 , 1983/2788 , 2189/2790 , 2195/2791 , 2227/2792 , 2227/2793 , 2238/2794 , 2238/2795 , 2242/2796, 2264/2797 , 2270/2798 , 2453/2799 , 2453/2800 , 2453/2801 , 2453/2802 , 2454/2803 , 2454/2804 , 2454/2805 , 991/2806, 992/2807 , 2354/2808 , 2382/2809 एवं 2276/2810.

2. खिंडा ग्राम ( भाग ) में अर्जित प्लाट संख्यांकः

च से छः - रेखा तालाबीीरा प्लाट संख्या 448 तक तालाबीरा और खिंडा ग्राम की सम्मिलित सीमा के साथ दक्षिण की ओर जाती है और फिर ग्राम खिंडा प्लाट संख्या 2336 , 577 , 2335 , 576 , 571 , 564 , 563 , 519 की उत्तरी सीमा से होते हुए पूरब की ओर मुड़ती है और प्लाट संख्या 529,530,512 की पश्चिमी सीमा से होते हुए उत्तर की ओर मुड़ती है फिर पूरब की ओर मुड़कर प्लाट संख्या 511,510,505, और 504 की उत्तरी सीमा से होकर जाती है और बिन्दु- छ पर मिलती है ।

छ से जः रेखा बिन्दु छ से आरंभ होकर ग्राम खिंडा प्लाट संख्या 504, 503 , 502 , 501 , 534 , 557 , 556 , 561 , 568 , 610 , के दक्षिण पूर्व कोने पर और प्लाट संख्या 611 से गुजरती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 611 की पूर्वी सीमा के साथ गुजरती है, फिर प्लाट संख्या 666 से होते हुए जाती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 722 , 721 , 720 , 719 की पूर्वी सीमा के साथ गुजरती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 727 , 726, 733 से होते हुए जाती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 790 , 788 , 2241 की पूर्वी सीमा के साथ गुजरती है , फिर प्लाट संख्या 2348 के दक्षिण कोने तक पहुँचने के लिए प्लाट संख्या 783 , 782 , 2348 से होते हुए जाती हैऔर फिर प्लाट संख्या 739 की सीमा तक पहुँचने के लिए दाहिनी ओर मुड़ती है और इसकी दक्षिणी सीमा के साथ ही साथ पूर्वी सीमा के साथ गुजरती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 773,772 की पश्चिमी सीमा के साथ गुजरने के लिए बायीं ओर मुड़ती है और फिर दाहिनी ओर मुड़ती है फिर प्लाट संख्या 768 की पूर्वी सीमा के साथ गुजरती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 1076 , 1078 , 1079 से होते हुए गुजरती है, फिर प्लाट संख्या 1105 की पूर्वी सीमा तक पहुँचने के लिए प्लाट संख्या 1085 , 1086 से होते हुए बढ़ती है और प्लाट संख्या 1105 , 1119, 1124 की पूर्वी और दक्षिणी सीमा के साथ बढ़ती है , फिर प्लाट संख्या 1125 से होकर गुजरने के लिए बायें बढ़ती है और फिर प्लाट 501,502,503,504,505,506,507,508,509,510,511,512 , 519 , 520 , 521, 522 , 523 , 524 , 525 , 526 , 527,528,529 , 530 , 531,532, 533 , 534, 556 , 557 , 558 , 559 , 560 , 561 , 562, 563 , 564 , 565 , 566 , 567 , 568 , 569 , 570 , 571 , 576 , 577 , 578 , 579, 580 , 581 , 582 , 583 , 584 , 585 , 586 , 587 , 588 , 589 , 590 , 591 , 592 , 593 , 594 , 595 , 596 , 597 , 598 , 599 , 600 , 601 , 602 , 603 , 604 , 605 , 606 , 607 , 608 , 609 , 610 , 611 ( भा ) , 666( भा ) , 667, 668 , 669 , 670 , 671 , 672 , 673 , 674 , 675 , 676 , 677 , 678 , 679 , 680 , 681 , 682 , 683 , 684 , 685 , 686 , 687 , 688 , 689 , 690 , 691 , 692 , 693 , 694 , 695 , 696, 697 , 698 , 699 , 700 , 701 , 702 , 703 , 704 , 705 , 706 , 707 , 708 , 709 , 710 , 711 , 712 , 713 , 714 , 715 , 716 , 717 , 718 , 719 , 720 , 721 , 722 , 726 ( भा ) , 727 ( भा ) , 728 , 729, 730 , 731 , 732, 733 ( भा) , 734 , 735 , 736 , 737 , 738 , 739 , 740 , 741 , 742, 743 , 744 , 745 , 746 , 747 , 748 , 749 , 750 , 751 , 752 , 753, 754 , 755 , 756 , 757 , 758 , 759 , 760 , 761 , 762 , 763 , 764, 765 , 766 , 767 , 768 , 769 , 770 , 771 , 782 ( भा) , 783 ( भा) , 788, 790 , 1076( भा ) , 1078 ( भा ) , 1079 ( भा ) , 1080, 1081 , 1082, 1083 , 1084, 1085 ( भा ) , 1086 ( भा ) , 1087 , 1088 , 1089 , 1090, 1091 , 1092 , 1093 , 1094 , 1095 , 1096, 1097,1098 , 1099 , 1100 , 1101 , 1102 , 1103 , 1104 , 1105 , 1118 , 1119 , 1120 , 1121 , 1122 , 1123 , 1124 , 1125 ( भा ) , 1126 , 1127 , 1128 , 1129, 1132 ( भा ) , 1133 , 1134 , 1135 ( भा) , 1141 ( भा ) , 1369 , 1370 , 1371 , 1372 , 1373 , 1374 , 1375 , 1376 , 1377 ,

3056 GI/2009-5 5098

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009 / BHADRA 14, 1931

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

689,690 से होते हुए प्लाट संख्या 691 पर पहुँचती है और प्लाट संख्या 691 , 692 की पश्चिमी सीमा से होते हुए प्लाट संख्या 703,704 से गुजरती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 2556 , 654 की पश्चिम सीमा के साथ और प्लाट संख्या 592 से होते हुए प्लाट संख्या 593 , 595 , 582 , 581 , 580 , 579 , 978 , 966 , 968 , 1014 की पश्चिमी सीमा से होते हुए प्लाट संख्या 1032 , 1035 की पश्चिमी सीमा से गुजरते हुए 1015 , 1017 से गुजरती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 1041 , 1042 से होकर गुजरती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 1043 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 124 , 136 , की पश्चिमी सीमा से गुजरती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 48 से होते हुए प्लाट संख्या 29 पर पहुँचती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 2928 की पश्चिमी सीमा से होते हुए प्लाट संख्या 27 से गुजरती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 21 की पश्चिमी सीमा के साथ प्लाट संख्या 19 से होते हुए प्लाट संख्या 16 की पश्चिमी सीमा से गुजरती हुई ग्राम तालाबीरा और पत्रापाली सीमा को छूती है ।

[फा. सं. 43015/2/2007- पी.आर.आई.डब्ल्यू-I ( वाल्यूम.11 ) ]

एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 28th August , 2009 संख्या 1129 , 1128 की पूर्वी सीमा के साथ गुजरती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 1132 से होकर गुजरती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 1142 की उत्तरी सीमा के साथ बढ़ती है और खिंडा प्लाट संख्या 2159 और तालाबीरा प्लाट संख्या 2216 की सम्मिलित सीमा के साथ ग्राम खिंडा और तालाबीरा की सम्मिलित सीमा तक पहुँचने के लिए प्लाट संख्या 1141 , 1135 , से होते हुए गुजरती है और फिर पश्चिम की ओर मुड़ते हुए प्लाट संख्या 2216 , 2217 , 2218 तथा 2219 की दक्षिणी सीमा से होते हुए जाती है , फिर दक्षिण की ओर मुड़ते हुए प्लाट संख्या 2230 की पूर्वी सीमा से गुजरती है और फिर पूर्व की ओर मुड़ते हुए प्लाट संख्या 2231 की पूर्वी सीमा और प्लाट संख्या 2232 की उत्तरी सीमा से गुजरती है और प्लाट संख्या 2687 , 2688 की पूर्वी सीमा के साथ दक्षिण की ओर जाती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 2688 की दक्षिणी सीमा के साथ जाती है और फिर पूर्व की ओर मुड़ते हुए प्लाट संख्या 2237 के उत्तर पूर्वी सीमा के साथ जाती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 2237 से हो कर तालाबीरा के प्लाट संख्या 2794 की पूर्वी सीमा तक पहुंचती है और ग्राम तालाबीरा और खिंडा की सम्मिलित सीमा को पार करने के लिए दक्षिण को बढ़ती है और खिंडा प्लाट संख्या 1369 , 1370 की पूर्वी सीमा के साथ गुजरती है और फिर पश्चिम की ओर प्लाट संख्या 1370 के दक्षिणी सीमा के साथ जाती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 1371 , 1381 , 1382, 1385 , 1386 की पूर्वी सीमा के साथ गुजरती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 1403 के उत्तरी पूर्वी कोने तक पहुँचने के लिए प्लाट संख्या 1386 से गुजरती है और फिर खिंडा ग्राम की प्लाट संख्या 1401 की दक्षिणी पूर्वी कोने पर बिन्दु' ज' पर समाप्त होने के लिए प्लाट संख्या 1402 , 1401 की पूर्वी सीमा के साथ आगे बढ़ती है ।

S.O. 2414. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O.1026 dated 8th May, 2008 issued under sub - section( 1) of Section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act , 1957 ( 20 of 1957) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , and published in the Gazette of India, Part- 11, Section - 3 , sub - section ( ii) , dated 10th May , 2008 , and amendment to the principal notification vide number S.O. 2354 dated 18th August, 2008 published in Part - 11 , Section -3 , sub- section ( ii) in the Gazette of India , Extraordinary dated 23rd August , 2008 , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to acquire the lands and all rights in the locality specified in the Schedule appended to that notification .

Andwhereas , the competent authority in pursuance of Section 8 of the said Act, has made his report to the Central Government ,

And whereas , the Central Government after considering the report aforesaid and after consulting the Government of Odisha is satisfied that the land measuring 383.893 hectares ( approximately) or 948.600 acres (approximately ) and all rights in or over such lands described in the Schedule appended hereto should be acquired.

ज से कः - रेखा खिंडा ग्राम प्लाट संख्या 1401 से दक्षिण पूर्व किनारे पर ज से बढ़ती है और फिर खिंडा की प्लाट संख्या 1400,1401 , 2408 की पश्चिमी सीमा के साथ दक्षिणी सीमा से गुजरती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 1398 से होते हुए प्लाट संख्या 2267 , 1394 , 2409 से गुजरते हुए प्लांट संख्या 1396 की सीमा के साथ होते हुए प्लाट संख्या 2262 की दक्षिणी सीमा पर पहुँचती है और ग्राम खिंडा तथा तालाबीरा की सम्मिलित सीमा पर पहुँचने के लिए उसकी दक्षिण पश्चिमसीमा से गुजरती है और तालाबीरा प्लाट संख्या 2473 की पश्चिमीसीमा के साथ गुजरती है और तालाबीरा प्लाट संख्या 2472 , 2471 , 2468 , 2462, 2463 , 2461 , 2456 से होते हुए प्लाट संख्या 2666 की पश्चिमी सीमा के साथ गुजरती है और प्लाट संख्या 2440 , 2439, 2438 से होकर प्लाट संख्या 2437 तक पहुँचती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 2437 , 2434 , 2432 , 2431 , 1965 , 1968 , 1969 , 1970 , 1972 , 1973 , 1977 , 2788 , 2019 की पश्चिमी सीमा के साथ गुजराती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 2094 के दक्षिण- पश्चिम किनारे पर प्लाट संख्या 2020 से होते हुए पहुँचती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या 2094 , 2093 , 2092, 2595 की पश्चिमी सीमा के साथ होते हुए प्लाट संख्या 2089 से प्लाट संख्या 2143 पर पहुँचती है और प्लाट संख्या 2089 , 2142, 2146, 2147 की पश्चिमी सीमा के साथ होते हुए प्लाट संख्या 2149 से होकर प्लाट संख्या 1369 पर पहुँचती है और इसकी उत्तरी सीमा से गुजरती है और फिर प्लाट संख्या

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 9 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 , the Central Government hereby declares that the land measuring 383.893 hectares ( approximately) or 948.600 acres (approximately) and all rights in or over such lands as described in the Schedule are hereby acquired.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

5099 ThePlan bearing number MCL/SUR/TALB/03/2008 dated 12th July, 2008 of the area covered by this notification maybe inspected in the office of the Collector, Sambalpur (Odisha), or in the office ofthe Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata- 700001 , or in the office of the General Manager ( LR& R ) , Mahanadi Coalfields Limited (Land Revenue and Rehabilitation Department) , Jagriti Vihar, PO. Jagriti Vihar , Burla , Sambalpur, Odisha .

SCHEDULE

IB Block XIII (Talabira- II )

Talabira Area, District : Sambalpur, Odisha

AllRights

(Plans bearing number MCL/SUR/TALB/03/2008 dated 12th July , 2008)

District

Remarks

Vill No.

S1 . No

Teh /PS

Area in Нес.

Name Mauja/ village

1. Talabira 3

( Part)

Rengali/ Sambalpur 331.465 Katarbaga

2. Khinda 2

Rengali/ Sambalpur 52.428 (Part)

Katarbaga

Total 383.893

Total 383.893 hectares (approximately) or 948.600 acres (approximately)

1. Plot numbers acquired in village- Talabira ( Part)

1 (P), 2, 3 , 4 , 5 , 6, 7, 8 , 9, 10, 11, 12 , 13 , 14, 15, 16, 19 (P), 21 , 22, 23,24,25,26,27 (P), 28 , 29, 30, 31 , 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40,41 , 42, 43, 44, 45,46, 47, 48(P), 124, 130, 131 , 132, 133 , 134, 135, 136 , 137, 138, 139 , 140, 141 , 142, 143, 144, 145 , 146, 147, 148, 149 , 150 , 151 , 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164 , 165 , 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171 , 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178 , 179, 180, 181 , 182, 183 , 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191 , 192 , 193 , 194, 195 , 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201 , 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209 , 210, 211 , 212, 213, 214, 215, 216 , 217 , 218 , 219, 220 , 221 , 222, 223 , 224, 225, 226, 227, 228 , 229, 230, 231 , 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241 , 242, 243 , 244, 245 , 246, 247, 248 , 249,250,251 , 252,253,254,255,256 , 257, 258 , 259 , 260, 261 , 262 , 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268 , 269, 270, 271 , 272, 273 , 274,275,276,277, 278,279,280,281 , 282, 283 , 284, 285, 286, 287, 288 , 289,290, 291,292,293,294,295 , 296, 297, 298 , 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308 , 309 , 310, 311 , 312, 313 , 314, 315, 316, 317,318,319,320, 321 , 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330,331,332 , 333 , 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340,341,342, 343, 344, 345,346, 347, 348, 349 , 350 , 351 , 352, 353 , 354, 355, 356,357,358,359 , 360 , 361 , 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369,370,371,372,373,374, 375, 376, 377, 378,379,380,381 , 382,383,384,385, 386(P), 387, 388, 389(P) , 392(P) , 393, 394, 395, 396,397, 398, 399, 400, 401 , 402, 403, 404, 405, 406,407, 408,409, 410, 411, 412, 413 , 414, 438 (P), 439 , 440, 441,442,

443,444,445,446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451 , 452, 453,454,455, 456,457,458,459,460, 461 , 462, 463 , 464, 465, 466,467, 468, 469, 470, 471 , 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477,478,479 , 480, 481,482,483,484,485,486, 487, 488,489, 490 , 491, 492,493, 494,495,496,497, 498, 499, 500, 501 , 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509 , 510, 511 , 512, 513 , 514, 515, 516, 517, 518 , 519, 520, 521 , 522, 523 , 524, 525 , 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, 531 , 532, 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539, 540, 541 , 542, 543 , 544, 545, 546, 547,548 , 549, 550,551 , 552,553,554,555,556, 557,558 , 559, 560, 561,562, 563 , 564 , 565 , 566, 567 , 568, 569, 570, 571 , 572, 573,574 , 575, 576, 577,578,579, 580 , 581,592(P ), 593 , 595, 596, 597, 598 , 599 , 600, 601 , 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608,609,610,611,612,613,614,615,616,617 , 618,619, 620, 621,622,623,624, 625 , 626, 627, 628 , 629, 630, 631,632,633, 634,635,636,637, 638 , 639, 640, 641 , 642, 643 , 644, 645,646, 647,648,649,650, 651,652,653 , 654,655,656,657,658,659, 660,661,662,663,664, 665,666,667, 668, 669,670,671,672, 673,674,675,676,677,678,679 , 680, 681,682,683,684, 685, 686,687,688,689(P), 690(p), 691, 692, 693, 694,695,696,697, 698,699, 700, 701 , 702, 703 (P), 704(P), 966, 967, 968, 969,970, 971,972,973,974,975,976,977, 978 , 979, 980,981,982,983, 984,985,986,987, 988 , 989 , 990, 991, 992, 993, 994, 995, 996, 997,998 , 999, 1000 , 1001 , 1002, 1003 , 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010 , 1011 , 1012, 1013 , 1014, 1015(P), 1017(P), 1018,1019,1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028 , 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1033 , 1034, 1035, 1041 (P), 1042(P), 1043 (P), 1965, 1968 , 1969 , 1970, 1971 , 1972, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979 , 1980 , 1981, 1982, 2019, 2020(P), 2089, 2090, 2091,2092 , 2093 , 2094, 2095, 2096,2097, 2098, 2099 , 2100, 2101 , 2102, 2103 , 2104, 2105 , 2106, 2107, 2108 , 2109 , 2110, 2111 , 2112, 2113, 2114,2115 , 2116,2117, 2118,2119, 2120, 2121 , 2122, 2123 , 2124, 2125, 2126,2127, 2128,2129, 2130, 2131 , 2132,2133, 2134 , 2135 , 2136,2137, 2138,2139,2140, 2141 , 2142,2146,2147,2148 , 2149(P), 2150, 2151,2152,2153,2154, 2155,2156,2157,2158,2159,2160, 2161,2162,2163 , 2164 , 2165 , 2166, 2167,2168 , 2169,2170, 2171,2172,2173,2174,2175,2176, 2177,2178,2179,2180, 2181,2182, 2183,2184, 2185,2186,2187,2188 , 2189,2190, 2191,2192,2193,2194,2195 , 2196, 2197,2198 , 2199 , 2200, 2201 , 2202 , 2203 , 2204 , 2205, 2206, 2207, 2208 , 2209,2210, 22112212 , 2213,2214, 2215 , 2216 , 2217, 2218 , 2219, 2220, 2221 , 2222, 2223 , 2224, 2225, 2226, 2227, 2228 , 2229, 2230, 2231,2232, 2234, 2237(P ), 2238 , 2239, 2240, 2241,2242,2243, 2244, 2245, 2246, 2247, 2248, 2249, 2250, 2251 , 2252 , 2253 , 2254, 2255,2256,2257, 2258 , 2259 , 2260, 2261 2262,2263 , 2264, 2265 , 2266, 2267,2268 , 2269,2270, 2271 , 2272,2273 , 2274,2275 , 2276, 2277,2278,2279 , 2280 , 2281 , 2282, 2283, 2284, 2285 , 2286, 2287, 2288 , 2289, 2290, 2291 , 2292,2293 , 2294,2295 , 2296, 2297, 2298 , 2299 , 2300 , 2301 , 2302, 2303, 2304,2305 , 2306,2307, 2308 , 2309, 2310, 2311 , 2312,2313 , 2314, 2315,2316, 2317, 2318 , 2319, 2320 , 2321 , 2322,2323 , [PART II--SEC. 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009/BHADRA 14, 1931

5100

755,756,757,758,759, 760, 761 , 762, 763, 764, 765, 766, 767, 768,769,770,771 , 782(P), 783 (P), 788, 790, 1076(P), 1078 (P), 1079(P), 1080, 1081 , 1082, 1083 , 1084, 1085 (P), 1086(P), 1087, 1088, 1089, 1090 , 1091 , 1092 , 1093 , 1094, 1095, 1096, 1097,1098, 1099, 1100, 1101, 1102, 1103 , 1104, 1105, 1118, 1119, 1120, 1121, 1122, 1123 , 1124, 1125(P), 1126, 1127, 1128 , 1129, 1132(P), 1133, 1134, 1135 (P), 1141 (P), 1369 , 1370, 1371 , 1372, 1373 , 1374, 1375, 1376, 1377, 1378 , 1379, 1380, 1381 , 1382,1383, 1384,1385, 1386 (P), 1387 , 1388 , 1389 , 1390, 1391 , 1392, 1393, 1394(P), 1395, 1396, 1398 (P), 1400 , 1401, 1402, 1403,678/2214,682/2215, 699/2216,705/2217,734/2218,736/ 2219 , 689/2220 , 582/2227 , 687/2235 , 783/2241 , 1100/2247 , 1394/2262 , 1394/2263 , 1394/2264 , 1394/2265 , 1394/2266,1394/2267 ( P) , 681/2275 , 681/2276 , 746/2304, 577/2335 , 577/2336, 577/2337, 583/2338 , 583/2339 , 585/2340 , 672/2341 ,693/2342 , 751/2343 , 782/2348 ( P) , 1388/2407 , 1395/2408 , 1444/2409(P), & 693/2432

Boundary Description of IB XIII (Talabira Block -II)

A-F: Line starts from beginning point ' A' on the common village boundary of village Talabira and Patrapali as well as on the north western corner of Talabira Plot number 16 then moves towards north along the common village boundary of Talabira & Patrapali upto Point A- 1 then turn east and passes through Talabira Plot numbers 1, 389, 386, 389, 392, 2503, 2505, 438, upto point " F" .

F-G: Line passes towards South along the common village boundary of Talabira and Khinda upto Talabira Plot number 448 and then turns east along the northern boundary of village Khinda plot numbers 2336, 577,2335 , 576, 571 , 564, 563, 519 and turns towards north along the western boundary of plot numbers 529, 530, 512 then turns towards east and moves along the northern boundary of plot numbers 511 , 510, 505 & 504 and meets point at point "G" .

2324,2325,2326, 2327 , 2328 , 2329, 2330, 2331 , 2332,2333 , 2334, 2335, 2336, 2337, 2338 , 2339, 2340 , 2341 , 2342,2343 , 2344, 2345 , 2346, 2347, 2348, 2349, 2350, 2351 , 2352, 2353, 2354,2355,2356, 2357, 2358 , 2359, 2360 , 2361 , 2362, 2363, 2364,2365,2366, 2367 , 2368, 2369,2370, 2371 , 2372,2373 , 2374,2375,2376, 2377, 2378,2379, 2380 , 2381 , 2382, 2383, 2384 2385 , 2386,2387, 2388, 2389 , 2390 , 2391 , 2392, 2393 , 2394,2395,2396, 2397, 2398, 2399 , ,2400, 2401 , 2402, 2403, 2404, 2405, 2406, 2407, 2408, 2409, 2410 2411 , 2412, 2413, 2414,2415, 2416, 2417 , 2418, 2419, 2420, 2421 , 2422, 2423, 2424, 2425,2426,2427 , 2428, 2429, 2430 , 2431,2432, 2434, 2435,2436,2437,2438(P), 2439(P), 2440(P ), 2443 , 2444, 2445, 2446, 2447, 2448, 2449, 2450, 2451 , 2452, 2453, 2454, 2455, 2456(P) , 2461 (P) , 2462 (P ), 2463 (P), 2464, 2465, 2466, 2467, 2468(P), 2469.2470,2471 (P) , 2472 (P), 2473,2251 /2474, 2194/ 2475,2189/2476,474/2477,215/2478 , 215/2479, 208/2480, 471/2481,243/2484 , 2203/2485, 2203/2486, 2187/2487,2195/ 2491,2195/2492,2195/2493,242/2494, 405/2502, 414/2503(P), 416/2505 (P ), 384/2506, 244/2507 , 244/2508,2186/2509,2186/ 2510,2185 /2511,2185 /2512 , 2185/2513, 147/2522, 2203/2531, 501/2532,659/2533,659/2534,2444/2543,2421/2546, 2405/ 2547, 2399/2548 , 2399/2549 , 2399/2550, 2399/2551 , 2399/ 2552,2399/2553,704/2556, 136/2558 , 180/2559,3/2560,2156/ 2584, 2133/2585, 2111/2586, 2020/2587 , 2020/2588,2104/ 2593,2089/2595, 578/2598,2412 / 2599, 254/2604 , 254/2605, 255/2606,2443/2665,2443/2666,2190/2674,2190/2675,2454/ 2676,2454/2677,2390/2678,2390/2679,997/2684, 1007/2685, 2234/ 2687,2234/2688 , 987/2697,655/2704, 2265 /2708,2267/ 2709,2267/2710, 2266 /2711,2264 /2712, 185/2713 , 185/2714, 185/2715,214/2716,216/2717,228 /2718 , 239/2719,239 /2720, 242/2721,242/2722,242/2723,455 /2724, 520/2725, 520/2726, 520/2727,520/2728,521 /2729,522/2730, 600/2731 , 625/2732, 625/2733,653/2734, 654/2735,986/2738 , 1983 /2788,2189/ 2790, 2195/2791,2227/2792,2227/2793 , 2238/2794, 2238/ 2795,2242/2796, 2264/2797,2270/2798 , 2453 /2799,2453/ 2800, 2453/2801 , 2453/2802, 2454/2803 , 2454/2804, 2454/ 2805,991/2806, 992/2807, 2354/2808 , 2382/2809 & 2276/2810.

2.Plot numbers acquired in village: Khinda (part):

G-H: Line moves from Point " G " on the south east corner ofvillage Khinda plot numbers 504, 503, 502, 501 , 534, 557, 556, 561 , 568, 610 and through plot no . 611 and then passes along the eastern boundary of plotnumber 611 and passes through plot number 666 and then passes along the eastern boundary of plot numbers 722 , 721,720,719 and then passes through plot numbers 727,726,733 , and then passes along the eastern boundary ofplot numbers 790 , 788 , 2241 and then through plot numbers 783 , 782, 2348 to reach to southern corner of plot number 2348 and thenturns right to reach the boundary ofplot number 739 and passes along its eastern as well as southern boundary and then turns left to pass along the western boundary of plot numbers 773,772 and tums right and passes along the eastern boundary of plot number 768 and then through plot numbers 501,502,503,504,505,506,507,508,509,510,511,512, 519, 520, 521, 522, 523 , 524, 525, 526, 527,528,529, 530, 531,532,533, 534, 556,557, 558, 559, 560, 561,562, 563, 564, 565, 566, 567, 568.569 , 570, 571 , 576, 577,578,579,580, 581,582,583, 584, 585,586,587,588,589 , 590,591 , 592, 593 , 594, 595, 596, 597, 598,599,600,601 , 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609,610, 611 ( P) , 666(P ), 667,668,669,670,671,672,673,674,675,676, 677,678,679,680, 681 , 682, 683 , 684, 685, 686, 687,688,689, 690.691,692,693,694, 695,696 , 697,698, 699, 700, 701 , 702, 703.704, 705, 706, 707 , 708 , 709,710,711,712,713,714,715, 716,717,718,719 , 720, 721 , 722, 726(P), 727(P), 728 ; 729, 730,731,732.733 (P), 734, 735,736, 737,738,739,740,741 , 742. 743,744,745,746, 747,748, 749,750, 751,752,753,754, 5101

भारत का राजपत्त्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

2666 and then passes through plot numbers 2440, 2439, 2438 to reach plot number 2437 and moves along the western boundary of plot numbers 2437 , 2434, 2432, 2431 , 1965 , 1968, 1969 , 1970 , 1972, 1973 , 1977,2788 , 2019 and then passes through plot number 2020 to reach south western corner of plot number 2094 and passes along the western boundary of plot numbers 2094, 2093 , 2092 , 2595 through plot number 2089to reach plot number 2143 and passes along the western boundary ofplot numbers 2089 , 2142, 2146, 2147 and passes through plot number 2149 to reach the boundary of plot number 1369 and moves along its northern boundary and then passes through plot numbers 689,690 to reach plot number 691 and passes along the western boundary ofplot numbers 691,692 and then passes through plot numbers 703,704 and then along the western boundary of plot numbers 2556, 654 and through plot number 592 and passes along the western boundary of plot numbers 593, 595, 582, 581,580 , 579 , 978, 966 , 968 , 1014 and passes through plot numbers 1015 , 1017 and passes along thewestern boundary of plot numbers 1032,1035 and then passes through plot numbers 1041,1042 and then passes along western boundary ofplot numbers 1043,130,131,132 , 133 , 134,124,136 and then pass through plot number 48 to reach plot number 29 and move along the western boundary of plot numbers 29,28 and then passes through plot number 27 then along the western boundary of plot number 21 and then passes through plot number 19 and then along the western boundary of plot number 16 to touch the common boundary of village Talabira and Patrapali .

[F.No.43015 /2/2007- PRIW - 1 (Vol . -11 ) ] M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy. 1076,1078,1079 then moves through plot numbers 1085, 1086 to reach the eastern boundary of plot number 1105 and moves along the eastern and southern boundary ofplot numbers 1105,1119,1124 then inoves left to passes through plot number 1125 and then passes along the eastern boundary of plot numbers 1129,1128 and then passes through plot number 1132 and then moves along the northern boundary of plot number 1142 and then passes throughplot numbers 1141 , 1135 to reach the common village boundary of Khinda and Talabira as well as thecommon boundary of Khinda, plot number 2159 and Talabira plot number 2216 and then moves towards west along the southern boundary of plot numbers 2216 , 2217,2218 and 2219 then moves towards south along the eastern boundary of plot number 2230 and moves towards east along the eastern boundary of plot number 2231 and northern boundary of plot number 2232 , and moves towards south along the eastern boundary of plot numbers 2687, 2688 and moves towards the southern boundary ofplot number 2688 and passes towards south along the north eastern boundary of plot number 2237 and passes through plot number 2237 to reach the Eastern boundary ofplot number 2794 of village Talabira and moves South to cross the common boundary of village Talabira and Khinda and then passes along the eastern boundary of Khinda plot numbers 1369,1370 and then passes towards west along the southern boundary of plot number 1370 and moves along the eastern boundary of plot numbers 1371,1381,1382,1385,1386 and through plot number 1386 to reach the north - eastern corner of plot number 1403 and then passes along the eastern boundary of plot numbers 1402, 1401 to terminate at Point ' H ' on the south- eastern corner of plot number 1401 of villageKhinda.

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 24 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2415.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आंन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर.ओ.यु. पाइपलाइन " के डब्ल्यू.डी. के. से केसानापल्ली 2 ( 1 /C ) " तक पेट्रोलियम के लिये पाईप लाईन तेल तथा प्रकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों के बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिये एतद्द्याबन्द अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

अतः अब, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है :

H-A: Line moves from point ' H ' on the south - eastern corner ofplot number 1401 of village Khinda and then passes along the southern as well as western boundary of Khinda plot numbers 1401 , 1400, 2408 and then passes through plot number 1398 and then along the boundary of plot number 1396 to pass through plot numbers 2267,1394,2409 to reach the southern boundary of plot number 2262 and passes along its south and western boundary to reach the common boundary of village Khinda and Talabira and then passes along western boundary of Talabira plot number 2473 and pass through Talabira plot numbers 2472,2471,2468 , 2462 , 2463, 2461 , 2456 and then passes along the western boundary of plot number 5102

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009 /BHADRA 14 , 1931

AndWhereas it appears to the Government of India that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here to :-

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्रधिकारी तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजामुन्द्रि एसट/ के. जी. बेसिन , ओ.एन.जी.सी. , गोदावरी भवन , राजामुन्द्रि, आंन्ध्र प्रदेश को अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा ।

और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

Now, Therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of right of User in land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ), the Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein :

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यु. पाइप लाईनः "के.डब्ल्यू.डी. के. से केसानापल्ली #2 (I/C)"

राज्य : आंन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल : मामीडीकुदुरू

गांव : करावाका H/ O गोगन्नामटम

जिला : पूर्व गोदावरी

Any person interested in the said land may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification , as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the Right of User therein for, laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority , Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G. , Basin , Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex , Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh .

आर.एस.नं.

एर्स सेन्टेएर्स एकड़ सेन्टस

हेकटेएर्स

SCHEDULE

(3) (4) (5) (6)

(1)

(2)

ROU Pipeline from " KWDK to Kesanapalli# 2( I/ C ) " 0

447/2

Mandal : Mamidikuduru

State : Andhra Pradesh

450/5ए

District : East Godavari

449/पी

Village: Karawaka H /o

Gogannamatram 0

055

446/1 (जीपी)

025

Ares Centi Ares Acres Cents

Hectares

R.S.No.

447/1 (जीपी)

(3) (4) (5) (6)

(2)

जोड़

(1)

447/2

450/5A

मंडल : मालीकीपुरम गांव : केसानापल्ली

राज्य: आंन्ध्र प्रदेश जिला : पूर्व गोदावरी

449/P

एकड़ सेन्टस

0 एर्स सेन्टेएर्स

055 आर.एस.नं. हेकटेएर्स

446/1 (G.P .) 0

(4)

(2) (3)

(5) ( 6)

0 (1)

025

447/1 (G.P. ) 0

568 /2सी 2

Total

568/2सी3

568/2बी2

जोड़

State: Andhra Pradesh District: East Godavari

Mandal : Malikipuram Village: Kesanapalli [सं. 12016/7/2009- ओ.एन.जी.डी. -3 ]

R.S. No.

Ares Centi Ares Acres Cents

Hectares

आर.एस. सिकदर , अवर सचिव

(5)

(3)

(6)

(2)

(4)

(1)

568/2C2

0 MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURALGAS New Delhi , the 24th August , 2009

568/2C3

568/2B2

Total

[No. 12016/ 7 /2009/ONGD . III ] R. S. SIKDAR , Under Secy.

S. O. 2415. Whereas it appears to the Government of India that it is necessary in public interest that for the transportation of pertoleum from " KDWK to Kesan- apalli # 2 ( 1 / C) " in the state of Andhra Pradesh , a pipeline should be laidby the OlL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD .

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्त्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

5103 नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्त, 2009

(1)

(2) (3) (4) (5) ( 6)

25/5

0 012

26P

0 04 का.आ. 2416.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आंन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर.ओ.यु. पाईप लाईन पि.एम.ऐ.ऐ. से मेडापादु-1 तक पेट्रोलियम के लिये पाईप लाईन तेल तथा प्रकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

25/6

01 10

0 02/2

26P

0 06

42p

0 और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों के बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिये एतद्द्याबन्द अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है।

052

43/ΛΑ

0 04

43/1Α

0 04

43 /ΙΑ

0 05

43/ 1A

अतः अब , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्यिों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एंतद्वारा घोषित किया है :

0 05

44/ЛА

0 06

44/1B

0 072

46/ 1A1

0 04

46/1B1

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्रधिकारी तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजामुन्द्रि एसट/ के. जी. बेसिन , ओ.एन.जी.सी. , गोदावरी भवन , राजामुन्द्रि , आंन्ध्र प्रदेश को अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा ।

0 04

46/4A

0 022

43 /ЛА

0 03 और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

46/6A

0 042 अनुसूची

46/2A

0 042 आर.ओ.यु. पाइप लाईन "पि.एम.ऐ.ऐ. से मेडापाबु -1 "

172/1

0 20 राज्य: आंन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल : येलामंचालि

173/2

0 03 जिले : पश्चिम गोदावरी

गांव: मेडापाढु

173/1

0 03 आर.एस.नं.

एर्स

एकड़ सेन्टस

सेन्टेएर्स

हेकटेएर्स

171 /ΛΑ

0 03/2 (2)

(1)

(3) (4) (5) (6)

46/ 5A

0 03 0

0 07

46/5A

0 03

46/5A

8/2 . (Govt Poramboke)

0 03 7/1Α

12/2A

0 01

0 05 7/2B

0 052

TOTAL:

1 72 9/3A1

0 052

101B1

0 03/2

10/1A2

0 032

राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: पोदुरू

0 03

जिले : पश्चिम गोदावरी

171 /2A (Poramboke)

गांव : पेनुमदाम

11 /1Α

0 04

हेकटेएर्स

आर.एस.नं.

एर्स सेन्टेएर्स एकड़ सेन्टस 11/2A

0 03/2

(1)

(2) (3) (4) (5) (6) 12/ЛА

0 04

178/1ए

0 05 25/2

0 05

177/1 बी

0 22 25/3

0 05

177/2ए2

25/4

0 12 0

0 042

666/1

0 11 5104

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009 /BHADRA 14 , 1931

(4) (5) ( 6)

(3)

(1)

(2)

0 13

177/22

0 0

173/2ए

0 02

341/1 ए

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

(3)

(5) ( 6) (2)

(4)

(1)

0 09

648/7बी

0 0

648/8बी

02 0

642/1बी

(Poramboke)

0 04 0

176/1 ए

0 0

175/2ए ।

0 01

642/2बी

(Poramboke)

0 06

176/ 1 बी

0 07

176/2ए

0 07 0

175/1 ए 2

0 04 0

175/ 1 ए 1

0 04

175/2बी 1

0 09

175/2सी 1

0 02 0

650/4बी

650/3बी

650/6बी

0 0

650/8 बी

0 09 0

650/9बी

0 03 0

651/2

(Poramboke)

0 10 0

175/2सी 2

0 16

340/1 (Poramboke)

0 02

327/1

0 08

667/1 ए 1

0 02/2

668/2ए ।

0 03

598/2

(Poramboke)

05 0

339/1 ए

44 0

339/2ए

0 339/3बी

0 0

372/1 ए

0 0

372/3ए

0 05

372/3बी

0 30

372/4ए

0 02

371/2

(Poramboke)

0 07

368/पी

0 10 0

367/4न्बी

367/4सी

0 07

367/7बी

0 21

602/1 बी

0 04

646/1ची

(Poramboke)

0 16

646/3ए

599/1बी

0 603/2

0 04

604/4बी

0 01

604/6बी2

0 08

602/3बी

0 04

604/8बी

0 0

604/10

0 06

667/1 बी1

0 24

604/9बी

0 10 0

602/1सी

0 13

602/2बी

0 40 0

602/4बी

0 12

591/ 1ए2

0 14

685/2

0 05

591/ 1 बी2

0 05

591/1बी3

0 04

586/2

(Poramboke)

0 05

464/1 बी2

0 01/2

647/1

0 0

01½ 355/2

(Poramboke)

0 0

354/पी

0 20

585/2बी

0 14

582/2बी

0 18

582/2सी

582/2डी [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(2)

(6) (1)

(3) (4) (5) 0

682/ 1 ए2

0 14 683/3 बी2

14 0

688/2

0 04 (Poramboke)

0 0

29 689/2ए2

690/1ए

0 032 0

17 691/ 1ए2

693/ 1बी

0 0

692/ 1बी

0 07 0

0 692/ 1सी

0 0

692/1डी

072

692/2बी

0 13½

721/2बी

0 22 0

725/ 1 ए2

04 725/ 1 बी2

0 21 0

728/3बी

725/1 बी 3

0 13

725/2बी

0 02 728/2बी

0 0

0 742/2

022

773/2बी

0 773/3बी

0 16

771/1सी 2

0 10 771/2बी 1

0 02 0

771 /2सी 2

0 05 733/2बी

0 45 729/3सी

0 07 729/3बी

0 15 0

774/2बी

0 12 732पी

0 04 730/1 बी

01 730/2बी

0 02 0

730/3बी

0 002 731/3बी

0 15 0

774/ 1 बी 2

0 14 774/2सी

0 09 3056G1/09-8

5105

भारत का राजपत्त्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

(6)

(5) (2) (3) (4)

(1)

0 15 773/1बी

0 08 771/1 बी2

0 10 770/4ए 2

0 09

786/5ए2

786/3बी

0 17 0

779/2

.0 09

0 05 779/3

780/1ए 2

0 022

787/1बी

0 27

08 787/4बी

787/6बी

0 13

0 05 786/12

0 06 786/1बी2

786/1सी2

0 04 0

786/2सी2

0 09 0

786/5बी2

0 08

786/5सी2

0 02 783/2

0 08 1196/2

Total

402

[सं. 12016/7/2009-ओ.एन.जी.-डी- III ] आर. एस. सिकदर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 24th August, 2009

S. O. 2416.--Whereas it appears to the Government of India that it is necessary in public interest that for the transportation of pertoleum from " PMAA to MEDAPADU - I " in the state of Andhra Pradesh, a pipeline should be laidby the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. And whereas it appears to the Government of India that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed hereto :-

Now, Therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1 ) ofSection 3 ofthe Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of1962), the Central Government of India hereby declares its intertion to acquire the Right of user therein:

Any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification , to laying the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd , Rajahmundry Asset/ THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009 /BHADRA 14, 1931

5106

K.G. , Basin , Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex , Rajahmundry , Andhra Pradesh .

ROU PIPE LINE FROM PMAA to MEDAPADU- I

Mandal : Elamanchili State: Andhra Pradesh

Village : Medapadu District : West Godavari

Ares Centi Ares Acres Cents Hectares

R.S. No.

0 07

8/2 . (Govt Poramboke)

0 012 0

-00

7 /LA

0 052

7/2B

0 052

9/3A1

0 032 0

10/1B1

0 032

10/1A2

0 03

171 /2A

(Poramboke)

0 04

11 /1A

0 032 0

11 /2A

0 04

12/1A

02 05 25/2

0 05

25/3

042 0

25/4

0 012

25/5

0 04

26p

022

25/6

0 06

26p

0 052

42p

0 0

43 /LA

0 04

43/ 1A

43/ЛА

43 / 1A

0 06 0

44/1A

0 072

44/AB

0 04

46/1A1

46/ 1B1

0 022

46/4A

0 0

43 / 1A

0 042

46/6A

0 042 0

46/2A

0 20

172/1

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

(4)

(6)

(3)

(5) (2)

(1)

0 03

173/2

03 0

173/1

0 0

03/2

171 /ΛΑ

46/ 5A

0 03

46/5A

0 46/5A

0 0

12/2A

1 72

TOTAL:

Mandal: Poduru State : Andhra Pradesh

District: West Godavari Village: Penumadam

Acres Cents Hectares Ares Centi Ares

R.S. No.

178/1 A

0 22

177/ 1B

177/2A1

0 0

666/1

177/2A2

173 /2A

0 02

341/ 1A

0 04 0

176/ 1A

175/2A1

176/ 1B

176/2A

0 0

175/ 1A2

0 04

175/ 1A1

0 04

175/2B1

0 09

175/2C1

0 10

175 /2C2

0 16

340/1

(Poramboke)

0 02

327/1

(Poramboke)

0 05

339/ 1A

0 44

339/2A

0 20

339/3B

0 12

372/ 1A

0 08

372/3A [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

(1)

(2) (3) (4) (5) ( 6) 0

372/3B

0 05 372/4A

0 30 0

0 371/2

02 (Poramboke)

07 368/p

367/4B

0 10 367/4C

0 13 367/7B

0 07 602/ 1B

0 21 646/ 1B

004

5107

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/ भाद्र 14, 1931

(2)

(1)

(3) (4) (5) ( 6) 0

602/ 1C

0 10 602/2B

0 13 602/4B

0 40 591/ 1A2

12 685/2

0 14 0

591/ 1B2

591/ B3

0 05 586/2

(Poramboke)

646/3A

0 16 464/ 1B2

0 05 0

647/1

012

0 0

355/2

0 012 (Poramboke)

0 17 354/p

648/7B

09 648/8B

0 03 585/2B

582/2B

0 14 582/2C

0 18 582/2D

0 23 682/ 1A2

0 14 683/3B2

0 14 0

688/2

04 (Poramboke)

642/ IB

0 02 (Poramboke)

642/2B

0 (Poramboke)

650/4B

0 02 0

650/3B

0 05 650/6B

0 04 650/8B

0 650/9B

651/2

0 03 (Poramboke)

667/1A1

0 08 668/2A1

0 022 598/2

0 03 (Poramboke)

599/1B

0 01 603/2

0 05

(Poramboke)

604/4B

0 04

604/6B2

0 01 0

602/3B

0 08 0

0 604/8B

04 604/10

0 01 0

0 06 667/ IBI

604/9B

0 24 689/2A2

0 29 0

690/ 1A

0 032 0

691/ 1A2

0 17 0

693/ 1B

0 16 0

692/ 1B

07 692/ IC

08 692/ 1D

072 692/2B

132 0

721/2B

0 22 725/ 1A2

0 01

04 0

725/ 1B2

0 21

728/3B

0 15 0

725/ 1B3

0 13 0

725/2B

0 02 728/2B

08. 742/2

022 0

773/2B

0 17 0

773/3B

0 16 771AC2

04.

0 10 0

771 /2B1

0 02 771 /2C2

0 12 [PART II -SEC . 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009 /BHADRA 14 , 1931

5108

नई दिल्ली , 24 अगस्त, 2009

( 6)

(4) (5)

(3)

(2)

(1)

733/2B

729/30

729/3B

का.आ. 2417.--यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आंन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर.ओ.यु. पाईप लाईन " केसानापाल्ली जी.सी.एस से पोन्नामंडा ई. पी. एस तक पेट्रोलियम के लिये पाईप लाईन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए।

0 12

774/2B

0 04

732p

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों के बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिये एत‌द्याबन्द्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है।

0 01

730/18

730/2B

001/2

730/3B

0 15

731/3B

अतः अब , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है :

774/1132

0 09

774/2C

0 15

773/1B

771/ 1B2

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइने बिछाने लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्रधिकारी तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग , राजामुन्द्रि एसट/ के.जी.बेसिन , ओ.एन.जी.सी. , गोदावरि भवन , राजामुन्द्रि , आंन्ध्र प्रदेश को अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा ।

0 10

770/4A2

0 09

786/5A2

और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति यह भी कथन करेगा किक्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत हो ।

0 17

786/3B

अनुसूची

779/2

0 05

779/3

आर.ओ.यू. पाइप लाईनः " केसानापल्ली जी.सी.एस. से पोन्नामंडा ई.पी.एस.

0 021/2

780/1A2

मंडल : राजोल

राज्य : आंन्ध्र प्रदेश

0 27

787/1B

गांव : काटरेनीपाडु

जिला : पूर्व गोदावरी

0 08

787/413

एकड़ सेन्ट्स

सेन्टेएर्स

एर्स

हेकटेएर्स

आर.एस.नं.

0 13

787/6B

1/1

0 05

786/1A2

0 06

1/2

786182

6/1बी

786/ 1C2

0 09

786/2C2

6/15ए

786/5B2

6/1ए

0 04

786/5C2

6/1 Cपीटी

0 02

783/2

6/1डी

0 08

1196/2

1/1पीटी

12 40 1/2

5 02

TOTAL

6/4ए

[No. 12016/7/2009 -ONGD - III ]

6/5ए

R. S. SIKDAR , Under Secy.

1 5109

भारत का राजपत्र सितम्बर 5, 2009 /भाद्र 14 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

हेकटेएर्स एर्स

एकड़ सेन्ट्स आर.एस.नं.

सेन्टेएर्स

03 6/6ए

6/7ए

01 0

6/8ए

TOTAL

राज्य : आंन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल : मलीकीपुरम

गांव : केसानापल्ली

जिजा : पूर्व गोदावरि

केकटेएर्स एर्स

एकड़ सेन्टस

सेन्टेएर्स

आर.एस.नं.

25 0

495/3

495/2

09 0

495/1

10 485/2

485/1

484/10ए 0

TOTAL

[सं. 12016/7/2009-ओ.एन.जी.डी.- III ]

आर. एस. सिकदर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 24th August , 2009

S. O. 2417. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation ofpertoleum from " Kesanapalli GCS to Ponnamanda EPS " in the A.P. state pipeline should be laid by the OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. And Whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the Right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here to :-

Now, Therefore , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of Users in the landAct , 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intertion to acquire the right of user therein:

Any person interested in the said land maý , object within 21 days from the date of this notification , to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority , Oil& Natural Gas Corporation Ltd , Rajahmundry Asset/ K.G. , Basin , Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh .

SCHEDULE

ROU Pipeline from " Kesanapalli GCS to Ponnamanda

EPS

Mandal : Razole State : Andhra Pradesh

District : East Godavari

Village: Katrenipadu

Acres Cents

Ares Centi ares

Hectares

R.S. No.

7 1/1

02 0

1/2

16 0

6/1B

6/15A

6/ 1A

12 0

6/1Cpt

6/ 1D

04 0

1/1pt

6/4A

6/5A

6/6A

03 6/ 7A

01 6/8A

TOTAL

State : Andhra Pradesh

Mandal:Malikipuram District : East Godavari

Village: Kesanapalli

Ares Centi ares Acres Cents R.S. No. Hectares

495/3

20 0

495/2

495/1

10 0

485/2

485/1

484/ 10A

TOTAL

[No. 12016/7/2009 /ONGD . III ]

R. S. SIKDAR, Under Secy .

5110

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009/BHADRA 14, 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्त, 2009

मंडल : राजोल

गांव : वेगिवारीपालेम , H/० खडालि जिले : पुर्व गोदावारि

का.आ. 2418.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर.ओ.यु. पाईप लाईन ताटिपाका 17 से ताटिपाका 16 तक पेट्रोलियम के लिये पाईप लाईन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों के बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिये एतद्द्याबद अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

अतः अब , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्यिोंका प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति , उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजामंन्द्रि एसट/के. जी.बेसिन , ओ.एन.जी.सी. , गोदावारि भवन , राजामंन्द्रि , आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा। और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाइप लाईनः " ताटिपाका-17 से ताटिपाका-16 राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल: मामीडीकुदुरू

गांव : गेद्धाडा

जिले : पूर्व गोदावारी

आर. एस.नं. हेकटेएर्स एर्स सेन्टेएर्स एकड़ सेन्टस (2)

(1)

(3) (4) (5) (6)

115/3

17 0

115/4

116/1

0 02 1/2 116/2

0 22 1/2 0

119/2

22 119/3

0 08 1/2 0

118

0 941/2 जोड़

एर्स

आर.एस.नं. हेक्टेर्ल्स

सेन्टेएर्स एकड़ सेन्टस (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5) (6) 0

373/2

12 0

373/1

09 0

375/4

0 21 1/2

375/3

02 1/2 0

45 जोड़

[सं. 12016/7/2009-ओ.एन.जी.डी-111]

आर. एस. सिकदर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 24th August , 2009

S. O. 2418 - Whereas it appears to the Central Government that is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum from Tatipaka # 17 to Tatipaka- 16 in the A.P. state pipeline should be laid by the Oil& Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

And whereas it appears to that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right ofuser in the land described in the schedule annexed here to:-

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in the land Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its interntion to acquire the right of user therein:

Any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification, to laying the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority Oil &Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/ K.G . , Basin, Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex , Rajahmundry , Andhra Pradesh .

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

ROU Pipeline from " Tatipaka- 17 to Tatipaka- 16"

Mandal : Mamidikuduru State : Andhra Pradesh

District : East Godavari

Village:Geddada

Ares Centi ares

5111

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्यिोंका प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है :

acres Cents

Hectares

R.S. No.

(2)

(3)

(5) (6) (1)

(4)

17 115/3

18 115/4

021/2 116/1

0 22 1/2 116/2

119/2

08 1/2 119/3

04 118

94 1/2 TOTAL

State : Andhra Pradesh

Mandal: Razole District : East Godavari

Village:Vegivaripalem H/o Kadali R.S. No.

Ares centi ares acres Cents Hectares

(6) (1)

(2) (3)

(4) (5) 0

373/2

12 0

09 373/1

375/4

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजामंन्द्रि एसट/के. जी.बेसिन , ओ.एन.जी.सी. , गोदावारि भवन , राजामंन्द्रि , आन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा। और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाइप लाईनः "एस.आर.ए.सि. से पि.एस.पि-29 "

मंडल : अळ्लावाराम

राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला: पूर्व गोदावारी

गांव : गुडाला

आर.एस.नं. हेकटेएर्स एर्स सेन्टेएर्स एकड़ सेन्टस

(5) (6) (1)

(2)

(4)

(3)

187/5पी

01 0

187/7पी

021/2 187/9पी

10 187/10

0 211/2

375/3

04 0

187/11

0 02 1/2

45 TOTAL

[No. 12016/7/2009/ ONGD. 111]

R. S. SIKDAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2419.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर.ओ.यु. पाईप लाईन एस. आर.ऐ.सि. से पि.एस.पि.-29 तक पेट्रोलियम के लिये पाईप लाईन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

अतः अब , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 )

13 187/19पी

180/20पी

05 157/2पी

05 156/1पी

156/2एपी

01 0

154/1एपी

09 0

154/1बीपी

04 1/2 154/2पी

05 154/4पी 5112

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009/BHADRA 14, 1931

(1)

(2) (3) (4)

(6)

(5) 154/5पी

0 08 1/2 0

0 07 1/2 152/ 1 ए

152/1 बी

07 1/2

153

12 149/2

06 149/3

14 149/4

0 0

149/5बी।

0 149/5बी2

0 0

148/ 1 ए

10 148/ 1बी

148/1सी

10 0

148/2बी 0

0 06 1/2 0

148/3

0 145/4

08 1/2

07 146/1 बी।

0 0

08 146/1 बी2

06 1/2

0 146/1बी3

15 146/1 बी4

10 146/1 बी5

0 320/पी

0 37 1/2 319/3बी

3 0

89 1/2 जोड़

राज्य : आंन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल : अल्लावाराम

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] (2)

(3)

(1)

(4)

(6)

(5)

134/1पी

11 0

14 130/1पी

12 130/3पी

128/1पी

05 176/6

0 .

176/7

01 0

128/2पी

11 0

149/2पी

06 0

149/3पी

()

0 07 1/2 149/4पी

07 148/1 एपी

05 148/1 बीपी

148/1सी

147/3पी

147/4पी

02 0

16 176/4बीपी

178/1पी

03 0

18 178/4एपी

06 0

144/P

(poramboke)

गांव : ताडिकोना

जिले : पूर्व गोदावारी

सेन्टस आर.एस.नं. हेकटेएर्स एर्स सेन्टेएर्स एकड़ (2)

(4) (5) (6) (1)

(3)

0 133/1ए

133/1 बी 0

02 0

16 133/2ए

0 0

133/2बी

13 0

2 35 1/2 जोड़

[सं. 12016/7/2009- ओएनजीडी- III ] आर. एस. सिकदर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 24th August , 2009

S. O. 2419.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in public interest that for thetransport ofpetroleum from " SRAC to PSP # 29 " in the A.P. state pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

And Whereas it appears to the Government of India that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here to :-

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in the land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the Right of user therein :

Any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification, to laying thepipe line under the land to the Competent AuthorityOil &Natural Gas Corporation Ltd, Rajahmundry Asset/K.G. , Basin , Godavari Bhaan , Base Complex , Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh .

SCHEDULE

ROU Pipeline " SRAC to PSP-29"

Mandal: Allavaram State : Andhra Pradesh

District: East Godavari

Village:Gudala

Centi Ares Acres Cents R.S. No. Hectares Ares

(6) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1)

01 187/ 5P

187/7P

022 187/9P

10 187/10

187/11

187/19P

09 0

180/20P

157 /2P

05 0

05 156/1P

156/2AP

154/1AP

09 0

154/ 1BP

04½ 0

154/2P

154/4P

154/5P

08½

072 152/ 1A

07½ 152/1B

12 153

149/2

149/3

149/4

08 0

149/5B1

3056 G1/09-7

5113

(6)

(5)

(2)

(3) (4)

(1)

08 149/5B2

01 0

148/1A

10 0

148/ 1B

148/ IC

148/2B

0 06 1/2

148/3

0 08 1/2 145/4

07 0

146/ 1B1

146/1B2 0

06 1/2 0

146/1B3

15 0

146/1B4

146/1B5

320/P

66 0

37 1/2

319/3B

3 89 1/2 TOTAL

Mandal : Allavaram State: Andhra Pradesh

District : East Godavari

Village: Tadikona R.S. No.

Centi Ares Acres Cents Hectares Ares

(5) (6) (2) (3) (4)

(1)

133/ 1A

22.

133/ 1B

133/2A

13 0

133/2B

11 0

134/ 1P

14 0

130/ 1P

12 0

130/3P

128/ 1P

05.

176/6

01 176/7

128/2P

149/2P

0 07 1/2 0

149/3P

149/4P

07 0

148/ 1AP

148/ 1BP

10 0

148/ 1C 5114

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009/ BHADRA 14, 1931

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5) (6) 147/3P

147/4P

02 176/4BP

16 0

178/1P

03 0

178/4 AP

18 144/P

06 TOTAL:

35 1/2

[No. 12016/7/2009 - ONGD - III ]

R. S. SIKDAR, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 24 अगस्त , 2009

का.आ. 2420.-यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आंन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर.ओ.यू. पाईप लाईन एल.जी.डी.बी से जि.सि.एस. लिंगाला तक पेट्रोलियम के लिये पाईप लाईन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों के बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिये एतद्‌द्याबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

अतः अब , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है :

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति , उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजामुन्द्रि एसट/के. जी.बेसिन , ओ.एन.जी.सी. , गोदावरी भवन , राजामुन्द्रि, आंन्ध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीक से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा। और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर.ओ.यू. पाइप लाईनः एल.जी.डी.बी से जि.सि.एस लिंगाला राज्य : आंन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल : कैकालुरु

जिले : कृष्णा

गांव : चिनाकामानापुडी आर.एस.नं. हेकटेएर्स एर्स सेन्टेएर्स एकड़ सेन्टस (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5) (6) 5/ 1B1

13 0

5/1C

19 5/8P

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (2)

(3)

(1)

(4) (5) (6)

6/1BP

05 4/BP

10 0

जोड़

[सं. 12016/7/2009- ओएनजीडी- III ]

आर. एस. सिकदर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 24th August, 2009

S. O. 2420.- Whereas it appears to the Cental Government of India that is necessary in public interest that for the transport of petroleum from " LGDB to LINGALA " in the A.P. state pipeline should be laid by the Oil& Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

And whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipelinc, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here to :-

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ), the Central Government hereby declares its intertion to acquire the right of user therein :

Any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification , to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd, Rajahmundry Asset/ K.G. Bcasin, Godavari Bhavan , Base complex, Rajahmundry , Andhra Pradesh .

SCHEDULE

Rou Pipeline from LGDB to LINGALA State : Andhra Pradesh Mandal: Kaikaluru District: Krishna

Village: Chinakamanapudi R.S. No.

Ares Centi ares Acres Cents Hectares

(3)

(2)

(1)

(4) (5) (6)

13 5/ 1B1

5/ 1C

5/8P

6/ IBP

05 0

4/BP

10 0

TOTAL

[No. 12016/7 /2009 - ONGD - III ]

R. S. SIKDAR , Under Secy.

5115

14, 1931

[ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ] भारत का राजपत्र सितम्बर 5 , 2009 / भाद्र

नई दिल्ली, 4 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2421. - पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) के नियम 2 (क ) के अन्तर्गत , मैसर्स रिलायंस गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड (आर.जी.टी. आई.एल. ) के द्वारा कर्नाटक राज्य में प्राकृतिक गैस पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने हेतु सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कार्यों का निर्वहन करने के लिए , भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैरा मंत्रालय की, भारत के राजपत्र दिनांक 03 दिसम्बर , 2005 को प्रकाशित , अधिसूचना का 0 आ0 4520 दिनांक 29 अक्टूबर , 2005 द्वारा पदस्थापित, मैं , नागनाथ मलागी , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) नियमावली , 1963 के नियम 4 के उप नियम (1 ) के नीचे दी गई व्याख्या (1 ) के अन्तर्गत अधिकारों के अनुपालन में, गैसर्स आर.जी.टी.आई.एल. , जिसमें यथास्थित , उस क्षेत्र में भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार निहित किया गया है और उस क्षेत्र में पाइपलाइन का स्वामित्व निहित है. के परामर्श से , संलग्न अनुसूची के स्तम्भ 4 में कर्नाटक राज्य के बीदर जिले में यथा उल्लेखित प्राकृतिक गैस पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीखों की घोषणा करता हूँ ।

अनुसूची

जिला: बीदर

राज्य: कर्नाटक

तहसील: बीदर

क . स .

ग्राम का नाम

प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख

धारा 6 ( 1 ) की का . आ . संख्या एवं दिनांक

22-07-2009

1302

दिनांक 08-04-2005

होकरना खुर्द

4336

दिनांक 10-11-2005

दिनांक 09-03-2009

788 (अ)

दिनांक 15-07-2009

1767 (अ)

1302

22-07-2009

2 राजगीरा

दिनांक 08-04-2005、

4336 दिनांक 10-11-2006

दिनांक 09-03-2009

788 (अ)

दिनांक 15-07-2009

1767 (अ)

1302

16-03-2009

दिनांक 08-04-2005

3 सिन्दोल

4336 दिनांक 10-11-2006

दिनांक 09-03-2009

788 (अ) 5116

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009/BHADRA

1302 पातरपली

14, 1931 [ PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii )]

22-07-2009

दिनांक 08-04-2005

4336

788(अ)

1767 (अ) 5

1302 सेखापुर

788(अ) 6

1302 बगदल

4336

788(अ)

1767 (अ) 7

1302 निडवंचा

4336 10-11-2006

दिनांक

09-03-2009

दिनांक

15-07-2009

दिनांक

08-04-2005 16-03-2009

दिनांक

09-03-2009

दिनांक

22-07-2009 08-04-2005 )

दिनांक

10-11-2006

दिनांक

09-03-2009

दिनांक

दिनांक 15-07-2009-

22-07-2009 08-04-2005

दिनांक

दिनांक 10-11-2006

788 (अ )

1767 (अ)

1302 8 बेंबलगी

4336

788 (अ) 09-03-2009

दिनांक

15-07-2009

दिनांक

22-07-2009 08-04-2005

दिनांक

10-11-2006

दिनांक

09-03-2009

दिनांक

दिनांक 15-07-2009

1767(अ)

1302

22-07-2009

दिनांक 08-04-2005

9 रेकुलगी

4336 दिनांक

788 (अ) दिनांक

1767(अ)

1302 10-11-2006

09-03-2009

15-07-2009

दिनांक

22-07-2009

दिनांक 08-04-2005

होचकनली

4336 दिनांक 10-11-2006

788 (अ )

1767 (अ)

1302 सीरकटनली

4336

788 (अ)

1767(अ)

1302 12 रनंजोल खेणी

788 (अ ) 09-03-2009

दिनांक

15-07-2009

दिनांक

22-07-2009 08-04-2005

दिनांक

10-11-2006

दिनांक

09-03-2009

दिनांक

15-07-2009

दिनांक

16-03-2009 08-04-2005

दिनांक

09-03-2009

दिनांक

राज्य: कर्नाटक

जिला : बीदर

तहसील : हुमनाबाद

1302 तालमडगि

788 (अ )

1302 2 सीतलगेरे

4336

788 (अ)

1767 (अ)

16-03-2009 08-04-2005)

दिनांक

09-03-2009

दिनांक

22-07-2009 08-04-2005

दिनांक

10-11-2006

दिनांक

09-03-2009

दिनांक

15-07-2009

दिनांक 5117 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ] भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009 / भाद्र 14, 1931

1302

22-07-2009

दिनांक 08-04-2005

नीम्बुर

4336 दिनांक 10-11-2006

788 (अ) दिनांक 09-03-2009

15-07-2009

1767 (अ ) दिनांक

1302

22-07-2009

दिनांक 08-04-2005

अल्लुर

788 (अ) दिनांक 09-03-2009

दिनांक 15-07-2009

1767(अ)

1302

22-07-2009

दिनांक 08-04-2005 )

मदरगॉव

4336 दिनांक 10-11-2006

788 (अ) दिनांक 09-03-2009

दिनांक 15-07-2009

1767(अ)

1302

22-07-2009

दिनांक 08-04-2005

6 मलकापुरवाडी

दिनांक 09-03-2009

788 (अ)

दिनांक 15-07-2009

1767(अ)

1302

16-03-2009

दिनांक 08-04-2005

नन्दगाँव

4336

दिनांक 10-11-2006

दिनांक 09-03-2009

788 (अ)

1302

22-07-2009

जलसिंगी

दिनांक 08-04-2005

4336 दिनांक 10-11-2006

788 (अ) दिनांक 09-03-2009

1767(अ) दिनांक 15-07-2009

1302

22-07-2009

9 चीनकेरा

दिनांक 08-04-2005

4336 दिनांक 10-11-2006

दिनांक 09-03-2009

788 (अ)

दिनांक 15-07-2009

1767 (अ)

1302

22-07-2009

दिनांक 08-04-2005

10 सेढोल

4336 दिनांक 10-11-2006

दिनांक 09-03-2009

788 (अ)

दिनांक 15-07-2009

1767 (अ)

1302

22-07-2009

दिनांक 08-04-2005

11 कनकटा

4336

दिनांक 10-11-2006

दिनांक 09-03-2009

788 (अ)

दिनांक 15-07-2009)

1767 (अ)

1302

08-04-2005

16-03-2009

दिनांक

12 हुणसगेरा

4336

दिनांक 10-11-2006

09-03-2009

दिनांक

788(अ) 5118

14, 1931

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009 /BHADRA

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )] तहसील: बसवकल्याण

राज्य: कर्नाटक

जिला: बीदर

1302

22-07-2009

08-04-2005\

दिनांक

राजोला

4336 दिनांक 10-11-2006

दिनांक 09-03-2009 ,

788 (अ)

दिनांक 15-07-2009

1767(अ)

1302

22-07-2009

दिनांक 08-04-2005

किटा

4336

10-11-2006

दिनांक

दिनांक 09-03-2009

788 (अ)

दिनांक 15-07-2009

1767(अ)

1302

22-07-2009

08-04-2005

दिनांक

नरायनपुर

4336

10-11-2006

दिनांक

दिनांक 09-03-2009

788 (अ)

15-07-2009

दिनांक

1767 (अ)

1302

08-04-2005

22-07-2009

दिनांक

यदलापुर

दिनांक 09-03-2009

788 (अ)

दिनांक 15-07-2009

1767 (अ)

1302

16-03-2009

दिनांक 08-04-2005

वेट बालकुँदा

788 (अ) दिनांक

09-03-2009

1302

16-03-2009

दिनांक 08-04-2005

बसवकल्याण

4336 दिनांक 10-11-2006

788 (अ) दिनांक 09-03-2009

1302

22-07-2009

08-04-2005

दिनांक

प्रतापुर

4336

10-11-2006

दिनांक

दिनांक 09-03-2009

788 (अ)

दिनांक 15-07-2009

1767(अ)

[फा. सं. एल-14014/27/2009-जी.पी.

मनु श्रीवास्तव, निदेशक New Delhi , the 4th September , 2009

S.O. 2421.-In pursuance of powers conferred by Explanation 1 in sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Rules , 1963 , I , Naganath Malagi , appointed by Government ofIndia , Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas vide Notification S.O. 4520 dated 29th October, 2005 ( published in the Gazette of India on 3rd December , 2005) under Section 2 ( a ) of the Petroleum & Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) to perform the functions of Competent Authority for laying natural gas pipelines by M /s Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited ( RGTIL) in the State of Karnataka , in consultation with M/ sRGTIL , to whom the Right of User in the land in that area has been vested and in whom the ownership of the pipeline in that area vests , hereby declare the dates , mentioned in Column 4 of the Schedule annexed herewith , as the dates of termination of RoU operation in District Bidar in the State of Karnataka .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ] भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/ भाद्र 14, 1931

5119

Schedule

Tehsil : Bidar

SI . No.

Village

1 Hokrana Khurd

1302

4336

788(E)

1767(E) 2

1302 Rajgira

4336

788 (E)

1767(E) 3 Sindol

1302

4336

788(E) 4

1302 Patharapalli

4336

788(E)

1767( E) 5

1302 Shekapur

788(E) 6

1302 Bagdal

4336

788(E)

1767( E) 7 Niduvancha

1302

4336

788(E)

1767(E)

1302 8 Bembalgi

4336

788( E)

1767(E) 9

1302 Rekulgi

4336

788(E)

1767(E)

District: Bidar

State : Karnataka

S.O. No. and Date of Notification under sub -section ( 1) of Section 6

Date of Termination ofOperation

Date 08-04-2005

22-07-2009

Date 10-11-2006

Date 09-03-2009

Date 15-07-2009

Date 08-04-2005

22-07-2009

Date 10-11-2006

Date 09-03-2009

Date 15-07-2009

Date 08-04-2005

16-03-2009

Date 10-11-2006

Date 09-03-2009

Date 03-04-2005

22-07-2009

Date 10-11-2006

Date 09-03-2009

Date 15-07-2009

Date 08-04-2005

16-03-2009

Date 09-03-2009

Date 08-04-2005

22-07-2009

Date 10-11-2006

Date 09-03-2009

Date 15-07-2009

Date 08-04-2005

22-07-2009

Date 10-11-2006

Date 09-03-2009

Date 15-07-2009

Date 08-04-2005

22-07-2009

Date 10-11-2006

09-03-2009

Date

Date 15-07-2009

Date 08-04-2005

22-07-2009

Date 10-11-2006

Date 09-03-2009

Date 15-07-2009 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009 / BHADRA

5120

1302 Hochakanalli

4336

788(E)

1767(E)

1302 Sirkatnalli

4336

788 (E)

1767( E)

1302 12 Ranjol Kheni

788 ( E) Tehsil : Humnabad

1302 1 Talmadagi

788(E)

1302 2 Sitalgere

4336

788( E)

1767(E)

1302 Nimbur

4336

788(E)

1767 ( E)

1302 4 Allur

788(E)

1767(E)

1302 5 Madargaon

4336

788(E)

1767(E)

1302 6 Malkapurwadi

788( E)

1767(E)

1302 7 Nandgaon

4336

788(E)

1302 8 Jalasingi

4336

788(E)

1767(E)

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

14, 1931

22-07-2009

08-04-2005

Date

10-11-2006

Date

09-03-2009

Date

15-07-2009

Date

22-07-2009

08-04-2005

Date

Date 10-11-2006

09-03-2009

Date

Date 15-07-2009

16-03-2009

08-04-2005

Date

09-03-2009

Date

State: Karnataka

District : Bidar

16-03-2009

08-04-2005

Date

Date 09-03-2009

22-07-2009

08-04-2005

Date

10-11-2006

Date

09-03-2009

Date

15-07-2009

Date

22-07-2009 08-04-2005

Date

Date 10-11-2006

09-03-2009

Date

15-07-2009

Date

22-07-2009 08-04-2005

Date

09-03-2009

Date

15-07-2009

Date

22-07-2009 08-04-2005

Date

Date 10-11-2006

Date 09-03-2009

15-07-2009

Date

22-07-2009 Date 08-04-2005-

Date 09-03-2009

15-07-2009

Date

16-03-2009 08-04-2005

Date

Date 10-11-2006

09-03-2009

Date

22-07-2009 08-04-2005

Date

Date 10-11-2006

09-03-2009

Date

15-07-2009.

Date 5121

14, 1931

भारत का राजपत्न :

सितम्बर 5 , 2009 / भाद्र

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

22-07-2009

08-04-2005

1302

Date

9 Chinkera

10-11-2006

Date

4336

09-03-2009

Date

788(E)

15-07-2009

Date

1767(E)

22-07-2009

08-04-2005

Date

1302

10 Sedol

10-11-2006

Date

4336

09-03-2009

Date

788(E)

15-07-2009

Date

1767(E)

22-07-2009

08-04-2005

Date

1302

Kankatta

Date 10-11-2006

4336

09-03-2009

Date

788(E)

15-07-2009

Date

1767(E)

16-03-2009

08-04-2005

Date

1302

12 Hunsgera

Date 10-11-2006

4336

09-03-2009

Date

788(E)

State: Karnataka

District: Bidar

Tehsil : Basavkalyan

22-07-2009

08-04-2005

Date

1302

1 Rajola

10-11-2006

4336

Date

09-03-2009

Date

788(E)

15-07-2009

1767(E) Date

22-07-2009

08-04-2005

Date

1302

2 Kitta

10-11-2006

4336

Date

09-03-2009

788(E)

15-07-2009

Date

1767(E)

22-07-2009

08-04-2005

Date

1302.

3 Narayanpur

10-11-2006

Date

4336

Date 09-03-2009

788(E)

15-07-2009

Date

1767(E)

22-07-2009

08-04-2005

Date

4 Yadlapuy

Date 09-03-2009

1302 788(E)

Date 15-07-2009

1767( E)

16-03-2009

08-04-2005

1302

Bet Balkunda

09-03-2009

Date Date

788( E)

16-03-2009

Date 08-04-2005

1302

6 Basavkalyan

4336

Date 10-11-2006

Date 09-03-2009

788( E)

22-07-2009

08-04-2005

1302

Date

Pratapur

4336

Date 10-11-2006

Date 09-03-2009

788( E)

Date 15-07-2009

1767(E)

[F.No. L- 14014/27/2009-G.P

MANU SRIVASTAVA , Director 3056 G1/09-8 5122

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5, 2009 /BHADRA 14, 1931

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

4. The Senior Section Engineer ( Loco) ,

श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 6 अगस्त , 2009

Southern Railway, Madurai Division

Madurai -625016

4thRespondent

APPEARANCES

Forthe Petitioner Union : M/s. Ratio Legis

: M/s . P. Arulmudi and Co.

Forthe Management

AWARD

का.आ. 2422.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार साऊथदर्न रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद मे केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 1/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 6-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide its Order No.L - 41011 /29/2007 - IR ( B - I ) dated 1-1-2008 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .

[सं. एल-41011/29/2007- आईआर ( बी -1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

The Schedule mentioned in that order is:

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi , the 6th August , 2009

S.O. 2422.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 1/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Southern Railway and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 6-8-2009.

[No. L -41011 /29 /2007 - IR ( B- I ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Friday, the 31st July, 2009

"Whether the action of the Railway administration ofMadurai Division in not allowing the officiating allowance and fixing the pay to the workmen who have performed the duties in higher post is justified or not in accordance with Rule - 913 of Indian Railway Establishment Manual ( IREM ) ? If not, what reliefthe workmen are entitled to? Whether the action ofthe Railway administration of Madurai Division in not allowing 30 % of Kilometre allowance to Assistant Loco Pilots in accordance with Rule - 913 (i) ofIndian Railway Establishment Manual ( IREM) isjustified or not ? If not what relief the Asstt . Loco Pilots are entitled to ? Whether the action of the Railway administration of Madurai Division in not calculating of Dearness Allowance in accordance with Railway Running Allowance Rules , 1981 is justified or not? If not , what relief the workman are entitled to?"

Present : Shri A. N. Janardanan , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 1/2008

2. After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 1/2008 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their advocates and filed their Claim Statement and Counter Statement as the case may be .

(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause ( d ) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Southern Railway , Madurai Division and their Workmen )

BETWEEN

The Secretary,

All India Loca Running Staff Association ,

Madurai

1stParty/Petitioner Union

Vs. 1. The Divisional Railway Manager,

Southern Railway,

Madurai - 625016

1 stRespondent

2. The Sr. Divisional Mechanical Engineer ,

Southern Railway.

Madurai Division

Madurai -625016

2nd Respondent

3. The Divisional Personnel Officer ,

Southern Railway, Madurai Division

Madurai -625016

3rd Respondent

3. Precisely the case of the petitioner is as follows: Somemembers of the petitioner union whose services were utilized to officiate in second higher grade posts and entitledto officiating allowance oftheir earned kilometreage allowance enhancedby only 15% for every such higher grade ( amounting 30% of the earned kilometreage allowance were allowed only 15% as against 30% in violation of the relevant rules and in unlawful denial of wages in terms of Rule - 913 ( 1 ) ( a ) of Indian Railway Establishment Manual ( IREM) , Vol . - 1 which amounts to unlawful wage reduction under Payment of Wages Act attracting Section - 33 (C) (2) . The running staff members are entitled to Dearness Allowance . Compensatory value for the eroded value of the wages/ pay sanctioned from time to time, calculated by adding a value equivalent of 30% of their basic pay being the pay element in their Running Allowance interms of Rule - 904 and Rule - 924 ( 1 ) ( i ) ofIREM and Rule -25 of the Running Allowance Rules , 1981 in 5123

भारत का राजपत्त्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

percentage and paid

to them . While from 1-4-2004 when the 50% of the Dearness Allowance was merged as pay/dearness pay for all purposes , dearness allowance for the same was not calculated by adding 30% of the value to it as laid down in Rules 904 and 924 of IREM, Vol.- 1 and Rule - 25 of Running Allowence Rules , 1981 in unlawful denial ofwages under the Payment of Wages Act attracting Section- 33 (C) (2) of I.D. Act, 1947. It is prayed that the non- compliance of the rules be considered and appropriate orders be passed .

4.In the Counter Statement filed by the Respondent, the contentions raised are briefly as follows:

Para-903 ofIREM , 30% pay element would fall under Clause (iii) of 1303 - FR- 921 (a) -emoluments specifically classed as pay by the President . Dearness Pay has not been classed as pay by the President under the above clause . With the merger of Dearness Allowance equal to 50 % of the existing pay with Basic Pay under Government Policy decision in view of recommendation of 5th Central Pay Commission , there is no change in the IREM provision to the effect that 30% of Basic Pay in the case of running staff should be treated to be in the nature of pay for specific benefits . In the absence of provision that 30% of Dearness Pay also should be taken into account for computation of various benefits , the claim leads to undue and unintended benefit not supported by rule and the claim is under a wrong interpretation of IREM . The Petitioner cannot agitate without a pre - existing right . Granting of allowances is to be examined by an expert body . Policy decision not infringing legal right cannot be questioned. Hence the prayer is only to be dismissed .

5. Points for consideration are:

(i) Whether denial of officiating allowance and fixing the pay of the workman performing duties in higher post by Railway is justified or not in accerd: nce with Rule -913 ofIREM?

(1) Whetherdisallowing 30% of kilometreage allesance to Assistant Loco Pilots in accordance with Rule-913 ( 1)( a) of IREM is justified or not

( iii) Whether non- calculating of Dearness Allowance in accordance with Running Railway Aliowance Rules , 1981 is justified or not?

(iv) To what reliefs the concerned workmen are entitled?

Point No. 2

6.Onthe side ofthe petitioner WWI was examined. On the side of the Respondent MWI was examined and Ex. 1 to Ex.M5 were marked. During the arguments the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly conceded in the written arguments submitted that in the matter of the claim under 2nd part of the reference i.e. regarding disallowing 30 % of kilometreage allowance to Asstt . Loco Pilots in accordance with Rule- 913 ( i) ( a) of IREM that in the case ofAsstt. Loco Pilots for whom claim is made herein the officiating period exceeded 30 days , and hence the reference has become infructuous . It is for the reason that under Rule-914 of Running Allowance Rules , 1981 which corresponds to Rule - 913 of IREM, Volume- 1 ( 1989 edition) when running staff members are put to officiate in arunning post for 30 days or less only they shall be entitled to the officiating allowance and when it is for more than 30 days , their pay is fixed in the higher grade under the normal rules . In the present case , as conceded by the learned counsel for the petitioner , the officiating period of all the Rule- 14 , Sub- Rule ( i) ( b ) of Running Allowance Rules , 1981 under which the fixation of pay is claimed should be read with Railway Board's instructions regarding norms for promotion to the post of Goods Driver fromthe specific feeder categories of staff. Under Railway Board's letter No.E(NG) / 1-96/PM4/ 14 dt . 17-4-1997 service rendered in the old unit will not be considered for promotion in the new unit in the case of employees transferred from a unit to the other. To the eligible member employees, the officiating pay has been claimed as could be seen from the remarks furnished by R3 to Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Central ). The claim is contrary to the Railway Board's letter which has not been challenged in vires or to its effect . The Railway Board's letters dated 1-5-1996 and 17-4-1997 are totally disregarded for the claim . Para - 913 should be read with Railway Board's instructions . The claim contrary to executive instructions cannot be sustained . Officiating allowances have been allowed as per the rule and the claim for 30% enhancement instead of 15 % is not tenable in view of Rule - 913 ( i ) ( a) which permits only enchancement of kilometreage allowance by 15% only . Monetary computation made by the petitioner is incorrect and no arrears are due to the employees . The petitioner is giving a different connotation to Paras 903 and 904 of IREM and Rule- 24 of Running Allowance Rules of 1981. 30% of the Basic Pay should be treated to be pay for reckoning various benefits including Dearness Allowance . The Railway Board have advised the method of calculation to be followed regarding emoluments of running staff consequent on the merger of 50 % of Dearness Allowance with existing pay w.e.f. 1-4-2004 shown as Dearness Pay which is to be counted as pay for all purposes . The claim of the petitioner under a different interpretation that employees should be paid Dearness Allowance stating that 30% of Dearness Pay should be considered for calculation of Dearness Allowance is not correct . Under Paras 903 and 904 of IREM, 30% of Basic Pay alone shall be treated to be pay representing the pay element in the Running Allowance . 30% of Basic Pay is taken into account for the purpose of arrving at Dearness Pay . 30% of Basic Pay is also treated aspay for Dearness Allowance . The claim to treat 30% of Dearness Pay for calculation of Dearness Allowance is not sustainable in the absence of a supporting rule . As per 5124

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009/BHADRA 14, 1931

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] Assistant Loco Pilots admittedly exceeded 30 days and, therefore, they are not entitled to the officiating allowance but are entitled to have pay the fixed in the higher grade under the normal rules . Therefore the action ofthe Railway isonly to be found justified and the workmen under this category are not entitled to the relief.

Point No. 1

arbitrary or even perverse . It does not sound ideal to maintain the view that the workmen not possessing the required qualifications or not satisfying a given set of conditions may still be employed to do a certain duty or service on a higher grade post owing to exigency of service or inevitability of such a service having to be maintained which is of an onerous nature or responsibility it is alien to comprehension why such persons shall not be conferred the benefits incidental to such employment? Why during a period of ad -hoc promotion or officiating to a higher post , the duty of which they are competent to perform , they should be denied the officiating allowance or fixation of pay? While the ordeal of a more serious duty is cast upon them , it seems quite unfair to deny to them the corresponding benefits to which but for lack of prescribed qualifications they would have been entitled on par with their counterpart workmen possessing such qualifications . It was for the reason of the employees being not actually eligible under rule for the promoption the fixation ofpaywas declined to them . That when it is denied due to the effect of the rule to the detriment of the employees and that unless the vires of the same is challenged that adverse effect couls not be got rid of could no longer be a good proposition . It could be visualized that on a close examination of the situation that what the relevant rules or the executive instuctions really forbid is a promotion in the sense of substantive nature when the workmen are found not to possess the requisite qualifications prescribed or not to satisfy the given conditions. They could still be allowed to officiate or given ad-hoc promotion , pure and simple . While so engaged they are to be given the benefits accruing out of or incidental to such engagement. Unhesitatingly or emphatically it is to held that denial ofofficiating allowance or fixing ofpay ofthe workmen performing duties in the higher post is not all justifed.

Point No. 3

8. On this aspect the argument on behalf of the petitioner is that Dearness Pay being portion of Dearness Allowance decided by the Government to be treated as Dearness Pay, the same shall be reckoned as pay for such purposes as are specified by the Government from time to time and for no other purposes vide Rule - 1417 of the Establishment Code and Railway Borad's letter No. PC - V/ 2004/A/ DA/ 1 dated 11-3-2004 . It is also contended that in the wake of letter No. PC - V/ 2004 /A/ DA/ 1 dated 21-12-2004 stipulating for adding 25 % of Basic Pay called asNPA (Non - Practising Allowance ) to calculate Dearness Pay as well as add 25 % of Basic Pay + Dearness Pay to calculate Dearness Allowance , denying similar treatment to the Running Staff is discriminatory. As against this , the contention of the Respondent is that as per the instructions of the Railway Board under letter No. E( P&A) 11- 2004 /RS - 13 dated 30-6-2004 and conforming to Para -903 of IREM, only 30 % of Basic Pay is to be pay element in the Running Allowance for arrving at Dearness Pay and for 7. It is argued on behalf of the petitioner that since as admitted by MW1 the services of the petitioners were utilized in exigencies of service and the fact that they actually officiated in substantive higher posts on ad- hoc promotion they are entitled to presumptive pay in terms of Rule - 1313 ( i )( a) ( i) of the IRE Code Rule - 103 (39) and Rule- 1306 of the IRE Code apart from the benefits available to running staffs officiating as laid down in Para -913 of IREM . Their further contention is that causing vacancies ofsubstantive higher posts to exist violating the mandatory provisions and there after employing petitioners - feeder category personnel on ad -hoc promotion or as officiating they should have actually been paid their pay in the higher post in accordance with the mandate ofthe relevant rules . MW1 has made it clear that possession of LM- 16 is not a condition for officiating whereas the same is a condition precedent for actual promotion . As against this, the learned counsel for the Respondent contended that in order to become eligible for promotion as Goods Driver, he should pass LM - 16 promotional course apart from satisfying the conditions ( a) that 6 years service ( combined as Second Fireman and First Fireman/Diesel Asstt./ Electrical Asstt. in the existing unit (b)2 years as First/ Fireman/Diesel Asstt./Electrical Asstt . and ( c) 60,000 Kms. experience of foot-plate in the above categories as laid downRailwayBoard letter No.E(NG) 1 -PM7/ 16(Pt.1 ) dated 1-5-1996. It is further pointed out that Sub -Rule 1 (b) of Rule- 14 of Running Allowance Rules , 1981 does not stand in isolation and it should be read in harmony with.Railway Board's instructions regarding norms for promotion : To the eligible promotees who have completed 6 years , officiating pay has been claimed actually . Same is the case with those who have completed 6 years combined service and also 2 years service in the lower grade and foot-plate experience of 60,000 Kms . The Railway Board's letter providing as above remains intact being unchallenged. It has been further pointed out that Supreme Court has held unless vires of a rule is challenged its effect cannot be challenged before the Court of Law. It is overwhelmingly brought home that denial of officiating allowance and fixation of pay is a stand which is extremely illogical , irrational , unjust apart from unethical too . There is conspicuous absence of pragmatic wisdom in the said approach .When owing to exigencies of service , it becomes inevitably a dire need to make one officiate or be given an ad-hoc promotion to higher post to perform essential duties or services a negation of benefits incidental to or accruing out ofsuch service is unreasonable , against natural justice , [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

5125

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/ भाद्र 14, 1931

calculation of Dearness Allowance . Claim for calculation of30% of Dearness Pay for Dearness Allowance is not with any support of a rule . Under clause (Clause - III ) of Rule- 1303 -FR- 9-21 (a) i.e. " emoluments which are specially classed as pay by the President only Basic pay alone classed as pay and not Dearness Pay. " Merger of Dearness Allowance is also policy decision of the Government . There is no specific provision in the manual to treat 30% of Dearness Pay computation of various benefits to the Running Staffs .

say, a new one on the resolute of anybody. Apparently , the merger ofDearness Allowance equal to 50% of existing pay with Basic Pay being later concept, the question of Dearness Pay being considered and relevant provisions being enacted touching it wherever necessary would not have been on the alert and thereby consequently entailed in making no relevant provisions as to that is only natural . That could possibly be the reason for various rules or executive directions having been conspicuously absent on the aspect . They are apt to be only omissions . Such innocent omissions are not to be read as creating as a vacuum with uncertainties or ambiguities . It is also good remembering that statutory rules cannot be fettered by any executive orders .

10. The above bottom line consideration take me to the irresistible conclusion that non- calculation of Dearness Allowance in accordance with Running Allowance Rules . 1981 is not justified and it is found so . Point No. 4

11. Inthe light ofabove findings on Points 1 to 3, it is held that disallowing officiating allowance and fixing of pay of the workmen performing duties in higher posts is notjustified ; the workmen are therefore entilted to officiating allowance and fixation of pay for performing duties on higher posts .

12. That disallowing 30 % ofkilometreage allowance toAsstt. Loco pilots in accordance with Rule- 913 ( i ) (a ) of IREM is justified but they are entitled to have pay fixed in the higher grade under the normal rules ; and that

13. Non -calculating of Dearness Allowance in accordance with Running Allowance Rules , 1981 is not justified; and that

14. The workmen are entitled to Deamess Allowance in accordance with Running Allowance Rules , 1981 .

15. Thus the reference is answered as above .

(Dictatedto the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this daythe 31st July, 2009)

A. N. JANARDANAN, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined: -

Forthe 1 Party/Petitioner : WWI Sri N. Narayanan

For the Il Party /Management:

MWI Sri T. Sankaran

Documents Marked

On the Petitioner's side

Ex.No. Date

Description

Nil

9. The above arguments on behalf the Respondent also do not seem sound and reasonable . The contention of the petitioner is that there is unlawful denial of wages when the pay element viz . 30% of Basic Pay is not reckoned for calculation ofDearness Allowance . The pay element being 30% of Basic Pay should be treated as Pay for reckoning various benefits including Dearness Allowance . That there isno specific order or rule to that score is the shield of argument wielded by the Respondent . It is argued that pay element would fall under emoluments classed as Pay by President and that Dearness Pay has not been so classed as pay by the President . It is under Government decision in the wake of 5th Central Pay commission Report that the merger of Dearness Allowance equal to 50% of existing pay with Basic Pay emerged . It is in the absence of a corresponding change in the IREM provision to the effect that 30% of Basic Pay in the case of Running Staff should be treated to be in the nature of pay for specific benefits that the Respondent opposes the claim of the petitioner . Whatever be the arguments against the treatment of pay element also as pay for calculation of Dearness Allowance one thing is certain that unless that part of pay is also reckoned for calculation of Dearness Allowance there would be unlawful erosion of wage resulting in wage reduction to the peril of workmen which mischief being only latent then would not have been thought of for being avoided due to lack of the required advertence , diligence and caution so as to be an omission not deliberate . Had. it been properly adverted to such an omission could not have happened . Logically , it could not be conceived as a well thought out decision avoiding all infirmities or those possible to be attached to it . So viewed inadvertent non- mention or the occasioned omission to include it as pay for the purpose of calculation of Dearness Allowance cannot be characterzied as the absence of an existing right which as argued by the Respondent cannot be agitated . It being nonest , which contention is not sustainable . The argument that the claim is undue or is an unintended right also has to be understood as fallacious . It cannot be straightaway said that the said benefit was not intended at all . The only thing isthat such a benefit had not been adverted to . Normally a Dearness Pay is to be treated as pay for all purpose. There is no reason why there should be a departure from the normal rule . Logical reasoning and transition of thought in the right sequence cannot but approve the said proposition . There is no question of granting an allowance , [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] 5126

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009 /BHADRA 14, 1931

REPRESENTATIVES

On the Management's side

: None

For the management

Date

Ex. No.

Description

None

For the Union (Workman ) :

1-5-1996

Ex. M1

State: West Bangal

Industry: Bank

Dated the 28-5-2009

Railway Board's Letter No. E(NG)-PM7 / 16 /Pt.1 dated 1-5-1996

AWARD

Ex. M2 17-4-1997

Railway Board's Letter No. E(NG)-96/PM4/14 dated 17-4-1997

Ex. M3 30-6-2004

Railway Board'sLetterNo. E(P &A) II -2004 /RS- 13 dated 30-6-2004

Ex . M4 24-4-2007

In exercise ofpowers conferred by clause ( d) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ), Government of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter No. L- 22011 /5/2004- IR ( B - II ) dated 3-6-2004 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by thisTribunal .

Railway Board's Letter No. E ( P& A) II - 2006 /RS - 28 dated 24-4-2007

SCHEDULE

Ex . M5 9-4-2009

ProofAffidavit filed on behalf of Respondents .

नई दिल्ली, 10 अगस्त , 2009

का.आ. 2423.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार युनाइटेड बैंक ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय आसनसोल के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 26/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the selection of computer operators including modification of the panel by the management of United Bank of India , Burdwan , Regional Office ignoring interse seniority of the workmanwho qualified the aptitude test and attended interview is legal and justified ? If not, what reliefthe workman are entitled and from which date? Can the Station Area of consideration ( viz Burdwan Municipal Area , Durgapur Project Area etc. ) be changed after completion of training aptitude test, interview for the post ofcomputer operators ? If years , whatshould be the criteria for such change ? " [सं. एल-22011 /5/2004- आईआर ( बी-11 ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi, the 10th August, 2009 S.O. 2423.-In Pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.26/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal Asansol now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of United Bank of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 7-8-2009 .

Onreceipt ofthe Order No. L-2201 1 /5/2004 - IR (B - 11 ) dated 3-6-2004 of the above mentioned reference from the Government of India , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute , a refeence case No. 26 of 2004 wasregistered on 14-6-2004 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post to the parties concerned directing them to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims . In pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

[No. L-22011/5 /2004- IR (B- II ) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT ASANSOL

Present : Sri Manoranjan Pattnaik , Presiding Officer Reference No. 26 of 2004

Parties:

Management of United Bank of India Burdwan Vrs .

Their Workman

3. Both the parties remained at variance for some time heard on the above issue . However , before laying down their respective evidence both the parties gave out inwritingto the effect that consequent upon the promotion ofthe concern workman i.e. Shamita Das to the grade of officer, the issue was resolved . On perusal of case record, the petition dated 22-11-2008 and that of the letter of the President of the United Bank of India Employees Congress dated 20-4-2009 it becomes clear that consequent up the promotion of Shamita Das and another three to the officer grade no dispute virtually exists and formal adjudication on the above scheduled issue becomes inconsequential . Accordingly an award of ' no dispute is passed and the matter is disposed of accordingly.Hence ordered.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्त्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

ORDER

Let an award be and same is passed an indicated above . Copy of the award be sent to the Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India, New Delhi .

MANORANJAN PATTNAIK , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 10 अगस्त , 2009

का.आ. 2424.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ बड़ौदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं.1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 257/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -12011/62/2000- आईआर ( बी-11 ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th August , 2009

S.O. 2424.-In Pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 257 / 2000) of the Central Governrnent Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , No.1 , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Bank of Baroda and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 7-8-2009 .

[No. L- 12011 /62/2000 - IR (B - 11 ) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ( NO.1 ) , DHANBAD In the matter of a reference under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) (2A) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 . Reference No. 257/2007

Parties :

Employers in relation to the management of Bank ofBaroda, And Theirworkman

Present : Shri Hari Mangal Singh , Presiding Officer APPEARANCES

: Sri N. Ramakrishna , Sr. Manager (HRM) For the Management

FortheUnion

: None

State : Jharkhand

Industry : Bank

Dated: 30-6-2009

5127

AWARD

By order No. L - 12011 / 62 /2000 - IR ( B - II ) dated 11-9-2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub -section (1 ) and sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :-

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Bank of Baroda in replacement of advance ledger posting machines by computers and posting ALPM operators to work on these computers without upgrading these ALPM operators and payment of special allowance is justified? If not, what reliefthe union is entitled to ?"

It appears from the record that this case is pending since 25-9-2000 for filing of written statement by the workman. In spite of notice sent to the sponsoring union by speed post, neither representative nor workman has turned up . It rneans that workman is not interested to contest the case further more .

In view ofsuch circumstance , I pass a NO DISPUTE Award in present Reference case .

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 10 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2425.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सैंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 22/5/2007 एवं 2/25/2006) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-12025/1 /2009- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th August , 2009

S.O. 2425.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.2 /5 of 2007 & 2/25 of 2006 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum - Labour Court , No.2 , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management ofCentral Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 7-8-2009 .

[No. L- 12025/ 1 /2009 - IR (B - II ) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009/BHADRA 14, 1931

5128

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2 , MUMBAI

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Ex-4 PROCEEDINGS OF THE LOK ADALAT HELD AT MUMBAI ON 29-9-2008

Panel Members

Present : Shri A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer Complaint No. CGIT - 2 /5 of 2007

Reference No. CGIT -2/25 of 2006

Parties:

Shri V. Iayydurai Pushparaj ,

RoomNo. 10,

Rajabali Chawl No. 14 , Dharavi ,

...Complainant Mumbai -400 017.

Versus

The Dy. General Manager ( HRD) ,

Central Bank of India ,

CentralOffice,

Chandermukhi,

Nariman Point,

Mumbai-400 021

...Opponent

APPEARANCES

: In person .

Forthe Complainant

Forthe Opponent

: Mr. L. L. D' Souza Representative Mumbai , dated the 29th September, 2008

AWARD

1. Complainant has filed this complaint under Section 33 -A of the Industrial Disputes Act requesting to hold and declare Opponent has deliberately and willfully contravened the provisions of Section 33 - A of Industrial Disputes Act regarding transaction mentioned in paragraph 5 of the complaint.

2. Said was disputed by Opponent by filing reply Ex-3 and matter was posted for recording evidence of the parties.

3.Howeverby Ex -4 both parties arrived at settlement before Lok- Adalat conducted at Mumbai . Hence the order :

ORDER

Inview ofEx-4, complaint is disposed of as per purshis given in LokAdalat .

Date: 29-9-2008

A. A. LAD, Presiding Officer (1) Shri M. B. Anchan , Advocate

(2) Shri S. V. Alva , Advocate

(3) Shri A. M. Koyande , Advocate

(4) Ms. Vibhuti Borhade , Advocate

COMP. CGIT - 2 / 5 of 2007

Shri V. Pushparaj

V/s.

Central Bank of India

The Panel is informed that the Complaint CGIT- 2/ 5 of 2007 is withdrawn as the Bank has allowed him to resume duties . He has no claim in this complaint.

Matterfixed before Hon'ble Court for orders .

Sd/-

(PanelMembers )

Sd/-

(Mr.Ghanekar)

Representative for Bank Sd/-

(V.I. Pushparaj )

Complainant

Sd/-

(Adv. Ganesh)

ForBank

Seen

Sd/-

(Presiding Officer )

CGIT- 2, Mumbai

29-9-2008

नई दिल्ली , 10 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2426.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एल.आई.सी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक 5129 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 100/1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को7-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-17012/47/96- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 10th August , 2009 S.O. 2426. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 100/97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court No. 1 , Dhanbad now a shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of L.1.C of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 7-8-2009.

[No. L- 17012/47/96- IR (B- II)]

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. I, DHANBAD

In the matter of a reference U/s . 10 ( 1 ) (d) of I.D. Act, 1947

Reference No. 100 of 1997

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Life Insurance Corporation of India. AND Their Workmen .

Present: Shri H. M. Singh , Presiding Officer .

APPEARANCES

Forthe Employers : Shri M. A. Khan , Advocate

: Shri S. Paul , Advocate

For the Workman

State : Jharkhand.

Industry: Insurance .

Dated, the 22 nd June , 2009

AWARD

By Order No. L- 17012/47/96- IR (B - II) dated 23-4-97

the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to thisTribunal:

3years, during which he has rendered more than 240 days ' service in each of the calendar years . The concerned workman has been paid his wages every month initially @Rs. 750 per month calculated @ Rs . 25 per day. The relationship of master and servant between L.I.C. of India and the concerned workman exists because the concemed workman had rendered his services , the benefit of which has been received by the management of L.I.C. of India. In lieu of the services rendered by the concerned workman, he has received remuneration from the L.I.C. of India which satisfies the criteria for master and servant relationship . He had been working as a Peon and the nature ofwork performed by him was permanent. He had worked regularly for all those years . There was no substitute for him even for a single day. The concerned workman had no permission to leave the place of his work without applying for leave, which he could avail only when duly granted by a competent officer of the L.I.C. of India , Bokaro Branch- I . During April and May , 1995 the concemed workman had applied for leave which was granted by Sri S.P. Pandey, A.O. Bokaro L.I.C. of India Branch- I . A daily wager or a day labourer is never required to apply for leave , nor he enjoys the leave benefit. The management of L.I.C. is a Govemment of India Undertaking having its service rules and regulations wherein there is no provision for appointment ofa ' coolie ' for a long period of four years to complete the alleged extra work . The concerned workman was never appointed as a coolie nor he worked as a coolie . The management of L.1.C. as a model employer of the Government is expected to maintain a fairness in the relationship with its workers , as such, the concerned workman shall be deemed to have been regularised and he cannot be thrown of his employment in an arbitrary and whimsical manner. The management had waived the written test and oral interview and allowed him to work for more than three years thereafter suddenly from 7-9-94 he was prevented from marking his attendance , but he continued to perform his job . The management had acted mlafidely and in violation of the principles of natural justice by terminating the service of the concerned workman . The management has committed agross illegality and an unfair labour practice by deputing another person in the same place for the same job , by depriving the concerned workman. It has been prayed that the Hon'ble Tribunal be pleaged to pass an award in favour of the concerned workman .

"Whether the action of the Senior Banch Manager , LIC of India, Branch- I , Sector - IV , Bokaro Steel City, P.O. Sector - IV, Dist. Bokaro in terminating the services of Subhakant Pathak w.e.f. 7-9-94 is justified? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled to ?"

3. The written statement has been filed by the management stating that the reference is not legally maintainable . There exists no employer - employee relationship between the management and the concerned person. The reference is invalid for the reasons that no demand was ever made to the management .

It has been submitted that the method of recruitment, the conditions of service, the scale of pay and conduct rules regulating the service conditions are governed by the statutes laid down therein . There is an 2. The concerned workman has filed written statement stating that he was appointed in L.I.C. Branch- I , Sector - IV Bokaro Steel City as a Class - IV worker on and from 26-11-1990 and since then he had been working as a Peon under the management of L.I.C continuously without any break upto 10-9-94 for about

3056 G1/09-0 5130

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5, 2009 /BHADRA 14, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] inordinate long delay in approaching for the same without any explanation muchless satisfactory explanation and the same is overstale one.

Thewritten statement filed by the workman is full of misleading averments to extract undue concession. In the present case there is factual difference . The management has its own regular employees and the work through some persons is take casually whenever required. There is no merit in the above reference matter and no relief can be granted in this case . Sri S. K. Pathak was never appointed as a regular one farless against permanent post as Class - IV on and from 20-11-90, but was engaged as a coolie Le . as a daily labourer to meet the exigency of extra work load for a certain period on contract basis and on completion of the same his engagement came to an end. He was paid remuneration as agreed upon . It has been denied that he was working as a Peon for about four years . He was never appointed as a Peon or as any regular employee is envisaged under the Rules and Regulations Governing the Recruitment Procedure . It has been prayed that the Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to pass an award holding that the action of the management is justified in terminating the services of the concerned workman and he is not entitled to any relief.

4. Both the parties have filed their respective rejoinders admitting and denying the contents of some of the paragraphs of each other's written statement.

5.The concerned workman has produced himself as WW- 1 and proved documents . Exts. W- 1 to W-9 .

in cross - examination at page 4 that Sanjay Agarwal , the daily wager , who was appointed in his place . It shows that he was daily wager and Sanjay Agarwal has been appointed in his place . In cross -examination at page 5 the concerned workman has stated that " my engagement was required only when the necessity arose or the requirement made . " This only shows that he was engaged on daily wager when there was requirement and when necessity arose . There is no advertisement for that post, no publication has been given . Ext . W- 1 shows his school leaving certificate and Ext . W- 2 shows Employment Exchange Card and Ext . W-4 shows his application for getting leave from the management , but no any order has been passed by the management . Ext . W- 5 shows that he has demanded advance salary for whom it has been mentioned worked for 12 days has been approved. As per Ext . W- 6, W-6/ 1 , W- 6/2 , W- 6/3 , W- 6/4 and W-6/5 it only shows that he was paid wages by the management . This does not indicate that he was regular employee of the management by getting daily wages through voucher . Ext.W- 7 only shows that how many days he worked and whatamount became due at 25.75 rate total Rs.387.25 for 15 days . It only shows for how many days ' work he got wages. In the top of Ext. W- 7 it has been written from 15 April to 15 April , 1991. Ext . W- 9 is the statement given bythe concerned workman for his work in the years 1991 , 1992 and 1993. Document marked ' x ' for identification is an application by the concerned workman for his regularisation.

The management has produced MW- 1- Ardhendu Roy to support the case of the management .

The management referred in its written argument Supreme Court Judgements reported in -

6. It has been argued on behalf of the concerned workman that he worked continuously for more than 240 days in a calendar year and he was paid salary by the management .

7. The learned counsel for the management argued that he was engaged as a Coolie on daily wage basis for doing extra work . He is not entitled for regularisation because he is casual and paid daily wage as per requirement of the management. In this respect the concerned workman ( WW- 1 ) has stated in cross- examination at page 4 that -

(1) (2005) 8 SCC 481 , (2) (2006) 4 SCC 1 , (3 ) (2006)13 SCC727, (4) (2007 ) 6 SCC 207 and (5) (2007) I SCC 408. In Uma Devi's case the Hon'ble Supreme Court has clearly stated that an illegal appointment cannot be regularised as it is violative of Artical 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, which provide for equal opportunity in the matter of public employment to all . In the instant case , it is admitted fact that the concerned workman was a dailywager and has worked for few days in the Corporation and was not appointed/engaged in accordance with Rules of the Corporation much less by any competent Authority, and hence such a backdoor entry cannot be regularised not givenpowers to the concerned employees to get any relief from the Court of Law only because he managed to work somehow through backdoor entry .

8. In view of the discussion made above , I come to the conclusion that the action of the Senior Branch Manager, L.1.C. of India , Branch - 1 , Sector- IV , Bokaro Steel City, P.O. Sector- IV, Dist. Bokaro in terminating the services ofSubhakant Pathak w.e.f. 7-9-1994 is Justified. In the result, the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief.

In the above manner the award is passed.

" Initially I was paid on the basis of Rs.26 per day but later the payment was made on the basis of Rs.31 per day. The photo copies of the documents have been given to me by the concerned employees ofthe management and I got those documents from them after the termination of my service . Original of those documents are very much available with the management. It is not a fact that the original documents are not preserved after one year . The originals , as I have said , are still available with the management . Regular permanent employees are being issued pay slips . It is true that in Ext . W - 7 the endorsements and signatures on a plain paper. " It shows that he is not regular employee and regular employees are being paid monthly and pay slips are issued . He has also stated

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer [ भाग I1- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

नई दिल्ली, 10 अगस्त, 2009

का. आ. 2427.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ओरियंटल बैंक ऑफ कामर्स के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 67/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-12012/ 200/2001- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th August , 2009

5131 "Whether the action of the Management of Oriental Bank of Commerce , in awarding the punishment ofdismissal from the services to Shri Kuldip Singh, S/o Sh .Gurdial Singh is just and legal ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ?

2. None is present on behalf of the workman . Learned counsel for the management is present. From last many days fixed for the hearing of this case the workman is not ensuring his presence . The reference was referred by the Central Government in the year 2002. Several opportunities have been given to the workman but he is not availing the opportunity of being heard . It is already 1.15 pm. At this stage, I have no option otherwise then to dismiss the claim of workman in reference for non- prosecution and return the reference to the Central Govt . as such . Accordingly, the reference is returned as such. Let the Central Government be informed. File be consigned.

Chandigarh

4-11-08

S. O. 2427. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 67/ 2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court , No.1 Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation tothe management of Oriental Bank of Commerce and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 7-8-2009 .

[No. L- 12012/200/2001 - IR (B - II ) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA , PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT - 1 , CHANDIGARH .

Case No. I.D. 67/2002

Shri Kuldeep Singh , S/ o Shri Gurdial Singh , VPO: Mohanpur , Ludhiana - 141001.

.....Applicant

Versus

The Astt. General Manager , Oriental Bank of Commerce, Head Office , harsha Bhawan . Cannaught Place , New Delhi - 110001 .

Respondent

APPEARANCES

: None

For the Workman

: Shri N. K. Zakhmi For the Management

AWARD

Passed on 4-11-08

Central Govemment vide notification No. L - 12012/ 200/2001 - IR (B - II ) Dated 29-4-02, has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-

G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 10 अगस्त, 2009

का. आ. 2428.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार इण्डियन बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 316/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[ सं. एल-12012/94/2000- आई आर. ( बी -11 ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th August , 2009

S. O. 2428.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 316/ 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court , No.1 , Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indian Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 7-8- 2009.

[No. L - 12012/94/2000- IR (B- II ) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1 , DHANBAD Inthe matter of a reference under section 10 (1 ) ( d ) & (2A) of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 5132

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5, 2009/BHADRA 14, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] Referance No. 316 of2000

Parties -: - Employers in relation to the management of Indian Bank , Calcutta.

And

ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, No. 1 Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation tothe management of Uco Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 7-8-2009.

Theirworkmen

[No. L- 12012/ 194/94- IR (B - II) ] Present: - Sri H. M. Singh , Presiding Officer

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer APPEARANCES

ANNEXURE

None

FortheEmployer :

For the Workmen : Shri Ranjan Raj , Genl . Secretary

State : Jharkhand

Industry : Bank

Dated, 29th June, 2009

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- I , CHANDIGARH

AWARD

Case No. I.D. 175/94

Shri Sat Paul C/o Sh . J.C. Bhardwaj , Saproen . Distt . Solan (Himachal Pradesh)

..Applicant

Versus

By Order No. L- 12012/ 94/2000/IR (B - II ) Dated 18-10-2000 , the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) ofsub - section ( 1 ) and sub section (2A) of section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal .

Divisional Manager, UCO Bank, Post Box 23 , Circular Road , Shimla- 171003.

....Respondent " Whether the action of the management of Indian Bank, Calcutta regarding withdrawal of two increments of Shri Parikshan Choudhary, Clerk/ Shroff is justified ? Ifnot, what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

APPEARANCES

For the Workman : Sh . J. C. Bhardwaj

For the Management : Sh . N. K. Zakhmi

AWARD

2. This case is pending since 21-11-2000 for filing ofwritten statement by the workman . Thereafter , notices were issued to both the parties for filing of written Statement, but till 8-6-09 no written statement was filed by the workman concerned,

Passed on 1-12-08

Sri Ranjan Raj Genl . Secretary appeared and filed a petition stating that the workman concerned is not interested to contest the present reference case .

Government of India vide notification No. L- 12012/ 194/94-1R ( B - II ) Dated 1-12-94, referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal: - Hence, I pass a NO DISPUTE AWARD in the present reference case .

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 10 अगस्त, 2009

"Whether the action ofthe management ofUCO Bank, Chail/Shimla interminating the services ofSh. Sat Paul Peonw.e.f. February, 1987 is legal and justified ? If not, what relief is the said workman entitled to ?" का. आ. 2429.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूको बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 175/94) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को7-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -12012/ 194/94- आईआर. बी-11 ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 10th August , 2009

S. O. 2429.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 175/94 )

Onperusal ofentire materials on record, it is evident that the main question for adjudication before this Tribunal is whether departmental scheme adopted by the management can over ride the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act in regularizing/ continuing the workman in service ? It is the contention of the workman that he worked with the management from 9-7-1985 to 2-2-1987 continuously and had completed 240 days of work in the preceding year from the date of his termination . His services were terminated without notice and retrenchment compensation against the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act. It is also contended by the workman that he was paid Rs. 12 per day and Rs . 360 was paid to him every month . On the basis of above mentioned averments , the workman has requested for setting aside the termination order with भारत का राजपत्त्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/भाद्र 14 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

further prayer of his reinstatement into the services with full back wages and consequential benefits .

Management of UCO Bank has denied the contention ofthe workman that he had worked for more than 240 days in the preceding year from the date of his termination . It is contended by the management that the workman was engaged on daily wages as and when work required and was paid for the days he worked . It is further contended by the management of UCO Bank that it adopted a scheme regarding the regularization of the services of those workmen who had completed 240 days of work within a period of three years commencing from 12-10-86. As the workman has not completed 240 days of work with the management from 12-10-86 to 11-10-86 , he was not considered for regularization of his services . On this very ground, the management has requested this Tribunal for dismissing the claim of work .

Bothofthe parties were afforded the opportunity of adducing/ filing evidence . Sh . Sat Paul filed his affidavit and he was cross - examined by learned counsel for the management on 6-1-07 and 30-4-07 . Sh . Rakesh Kumar , Steno , ALC ( C) filed his affidavit which was marked as WW2 . He was cross - examined by learned counsel for the management on 3-9-07 .

Certaindocuments were filed by the parties . The main documents on which the fate of this reference depends are annexure PA marked A which is the calculation ofworking days filed by the management before ALC (C) in conciliation proceedings . This letter has been proved by WW2 . Annexure PB is the letter written by the workman to the Manager , UCO Bank on 24-8-87 regarding is appointment on regular basis in the bank.

Annexure KC is the failure of conciliation proceedings report, Annexure PC is also the letter written by ALC ( C) , Chandigarh - II to Secretary Government of India , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi .

Annexure Ml is the letter said to be written by Sh . Sat Paul to Zonal Manager , UCO Bank Shimla, dated 26-7-90 and copies of four debit vouchers have also been filed by the management of the bank. Complete file of conciliation proceedings before ALC ( C ) , Chandigarh is on record .

I have heard learned counsels for the parties and perused entire materials on record . It is the contention of the workman that he has completed more than 240 days of work with the management in the preceding year from the date of his termination. On the other hand, the contention ofthe management is that the workman was not eligible for the benefit of the management policy regarding the regularization of services of workman who has completed 240 days of work within 3 years commencing from 12-10-86 . It has been further contended by the management of the bank that as the workmen have not completed 240

5133 days ofwork from 12-10-86 to 11-10-89 , he was not given the benefit of policy of the management regarding regularization of service . The management has referred letter written by Sh . Sat Paul to the Zonal Manager which isEx . M - 1 which shows that from 12-10-86 to 11-10-89 , he had only worked with the bank for 61 days .

The claims of the management and workman are different . Workman is claiming that he had worked with the management ofbank for more than 240 days in the preceding year from the date of his termination and , accordingly , he is protected from arbitrary termination from the services. The claim of the management , on the other hand is that as the workman was not eligible for regularization of services as per the scheme of the management of the bank, his services were not rightly regularized . These two contentions are different in nature . Continuance in service on daily wages or the termination from the service as per the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act is altogether a different matter than the regularization of his services . It may be true that the workman might have not completed 240 days of work within 3 years commmencing from 12-10-86 to claim the benefit of regularization of services under the scheme adopted by the management and relied upon in its written statement . This Tribunal , while adjudicating this reference has to determine whether the termination ofthe workman was illegal being against the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act and this issue , in my opinion, has no concern with the regularization of the services ofworkman under the scheme mentioned and relied upon by the management.

Letter Annexure PA which was filed by the management before ALC (C) and proved by an official of ALC ( C) , Chandigarh . It proved that the workman has completed 268 days of work from 1-1-86 to 31-12-86 . The records of ALC ( C) which is on file , also proved that the workman has worked for more than 240 days in the preceding year from the date of his termination . The industrial dispute was raised without any delay and it is not the contention of the management that initial appointment as daily waged worker of the workman was illegal , and the person who appointed the workman was not competent for such appointment. The case being so , the termination of aworkman was protected by the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act . Needless to mention, the management has powers and authority to terminate the services of the workman , but it could only have been done as per the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act . Meaning thereby, one month's notice or one month salary in lieu of the notice and retrenchment compensation calculated as per the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act was mandatory and necessary requirement before terminating the services of the workman . It was not done by the management, hence , the termination order was illegal . As stated earlier, that the scheme mentioned and relied upon by the management cannot override the provisions of 5134

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5, 2009 /BHADRA 14, 1931

Industrial Disputes Act and it cannot be said that in view ofnot fulfilling the conditions of the scheme, the workman was estopped to raise a claim for the benefit of the provisions of Industrial disputes Act .

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 1 , DHANBAD In the matter of a reference under section 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) ( 2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 Reference No. 211 of2000

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Tetulmari colliery of M/ s . BCCL.

And

Their workmen

Present:-Shri H. M. Singh , Presiding Officer APPEARANCES

For the Employers

The termination of the workman being illegal, he is entitled for a suitable remedy . There are two possible remedies for redressal of the grievance of the workman. First is his reinstatement into the services on the same terms and conditions , he was working and another is a reasonable compensation. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case , and considering the view that the workman was not eligible for regularization of the services as per the policy adopted by the management , but , he was entitled for the benefits of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act , I am of the view that a reasonable compensation will be a suitable remedy . The reasonableness of compensation is to be considered on several factors such as the amount of one month's salary in lieu of one month notice , amount of retrenchment compensation, depreciation in money , interest thereon and litigation expenses incurred by the workman on accont of his illegal termination . Considering all the factors mentioned above, I am of the view that an amount of Rs . 25,000 will be a reasonable compensation to be awarded to the workman.

Accordingly , the management of respondent is directed to provide/deposit in the tribunal Rs.25.000 as reasonable compensation for redressal of the grievances ofthe workman. The reference is disposed of accordingly, Central Government be informed File be consigned .

G. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 10 अगस्त, 2009

का. आ. 2430.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं बी.सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 211/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-20012/8/2000- आई आर. ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th August, 2009

S. O. 2430.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 211 / 2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , No.1 Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relationto the management of M /s . BCCL and their workman , which wasreceived by the Central Government on 10-8-2009.

[No. L-20012/ 8/2000- IR (C- I)] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

Shri D.K. Verma , Advocate For the Workman : None

State : Jharkhand

Industry: Coal

Dated, 2 & 3 July , 2009

AWARD

By Order No. L - 20012 / 8/2000 - IR ( C- I ) Dated 24-7-2000, the Central Government in the Ministry ofLabour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub-section ( 1 ) .and sub section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal .

" Whether the action of the management of Tetulmari colliery of M/s . BCCL in dismissing the services of Sri Narayan Das , M /Loader w.e. f. 1-4-97 isjustified ? Ifnot , what relief is the concerned workman is entitled to ? " 2. This reference case was received in this Tribunal on 7-8-2000 . But inspite sending notice by speed post none appeared on behalf of the workman to take any step in this case. This case relates to the year 2000 and since then it is pending. It appears that neither the sponsoring union nor the concerned workman is interested to contest the case .

Under such circumstances , I render a 'No Dispute ' Award in the present reference case.

H. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 10 अगस्त, 2009

का. आ. 2431.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं बी.सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 249/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-20012/69/2000- आई आर( सी- I) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी 5135

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/ भाद्र 14, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 10th August, 2009

S. O. 2431. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 249/ 2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , No. 1 Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . BCCL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10-8-2009 .

[No. L-20012/69/2000- IR (C-I) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1 , DHANBAD Inthe matter of a reference under section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) & (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 Reference No. 249 of 2000

Parties :-Employers in relation to the management of M/s . B.C.C.Ltd

And

Their workmen

Present :-Shri H. M. Singh, Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES

For the Employers : None

For the Workman : None

State : Jharkhand

Industry: Coal

Dated, the 27th July, 2009

AWARD

By Order No. L- 20012/ 69/2000- IR ( C- I ) Dated 29-8-2000, the Central Government in the Ministry ofLabour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal .

"Whether the action of the management of Loyabad colliery ofM/s . BCCL in utilising the services of Sri Hari Chouhan in the Kankanee siding and not regularising him asLoading Clerk is justified ? If not , what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from what date ? " 2. This reference case was received in this Tribunal on 18-9-2000 . But inspite of sending notice to the sponsaring union by speed post none appeared till 13-7-2009 nor any written statement has been filed by the workman . It therefore appears that neither the concerned workman nor the sponsoring union is interested to contest the case .

In such circumstances , I pass ' No Dispute ' Award in the present reference case .

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 10 अगस्त , 2009

का.आ. 2432, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं बी.सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 91/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/63/2003- आई आर ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th August , 2009

S.O. 2432. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 91/2003) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, No.1 Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 10-8-2009.

[No. L- 20012/63 /2003 - IR (C- I)] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1 , DHANBAD Inthematter ofa reference under section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) & (2A) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Reference No. 91 of2003

Parties :-Employers in relation to the management of Bastacolla Area ofM /s . BCCL

And

Theirworkmen

Present :- Sri H. M. Singh , Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES

FortheEmployers Shri U. N. Lal , Adv .

Forthe Workman : Sri B. B. Pandey, Adv .

State : Jharkhand

Industry: Coal

Dated, 24th July, 2009 AWARD

By Order No. L - 20012 / 63 / 2003 - IR ( C - 1 ) Dated 22-8-2003, the Central Government in the Ministry ofLabour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d ) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal .

5136

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009 /BHADRA 14, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

APPEARANCES

Forthe Employers : None

Forthe Workman : None

" Whether the demand of the Mines Mazdoor Union from ofthe management of Bastacolla Colliery ofM/ s . BCCL for regularising Sri Satish Pandey as Store Clerk is fair and justified ? If so, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from what date ? "

State: Jharkhand

Industry: Coal

Dated, 29th July, 2009

AWARD

This case has been registered in this Tribunal on 13-10-203 . Thereafter notices were sent to the parties concerned for filing of written statement and rejoinder . The written statement and rejoinder has already been filed in this case .

By Order No. L- 22012 / 101 /2000-1R (C- 1 ) Dated 29-8-2000, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d ) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal .

Sri B. B. Pandey , Advocate appeared on behalf of the workman and filed a petition stating therein that the present dispute has already been settled and resolved with the management . As such , the concerned workman does not want to contest the case further more . He prays for passing a no dispute award .

Inview of such submission I render a No Dispute Award in the present reference case .

"Whether the action of the management of Loyabad Colliery of M/ s . BCCL in not regularising Sri Pranab Kumar Banerjee as Attendance Clerk is justified ? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled ? י

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 10 अगस्त, 2009

This reference was received in this Tribunal on 18-9-2000 and since then none appeared on behalf of the concerned workman to file written Statement , inspite of sending notices to the parties . It seems that neither the workman concerned nor the sponsoring union is interested to contest the case .

In such circumstances , I render a No Dispute Award in the present case .

का. आ. 2433.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 246/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 10 अगस्त, 2009

[सं. एल-22012/101/2000- आई आर( सी-1) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th August , 2009

का. आ. 2434.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं बी.सी.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 56/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

S. O. 2433. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 246/ 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , No.1 , Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Governrnent on 10-8-2009.

[No. L-22012/ 101 /2000-1R (C- 1 ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

[सं. एल-20012/17/2003- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th August , 2009 BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1 , DHANBAD

Inthe matter of a reference under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) & (2A) of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 Reference No. 246 of 2000

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of SijuaArea ofM/ s . B.C.C.L.

And

S. O. 2434. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Govemment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 56 of 2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , No. 1 , Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 10-8-2009 .

Their workmen

Present:- Sri H. M. Singh , Presiding Officer

[No. L-20012/ 17/2003 - IR ( C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer 5137 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/भाद्र 14, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1 , DHANBAD

Inthe matter of a reference under Section 10 (1 ) (d) & (2A) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 252 of 2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. I , Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in theIndustrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s BCCL and their workmen , which wasreceivedbythe Central Government on 10-8-2009.

Reference No. 56 of2003

[No. L-20012/88/2000- IR(C-I)] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Sijua Area ofM/ s . B.C.C.Ltd

And

Theirworkmen

Present : Shri H. M. Singh, Presiding Officer

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALNO.L, DHANBAD Inthe matter ofa reference U/s.10(I ) ( d) (2a) of Industrial Disputes Act . 1947

APPEARANCES

Reference No. 252 of 2000

For the Employers : Shri D. K. Verma, Advocate

For the Workman : Shri N. G. Arun

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of M/s. B.C.C.Ltd. AND

Industry: Coal

State : Jharkhand

Theirworkman

Dated, the 22nd July, 2009

Present: Shri H.M. Singh, Presiding Officer AWARD

APPEARANCES

None

For the Employers :

: None

For the Workman

State : Jharkhand : Indusstry : Coal .

Dated, the 30th July, 2009. AWARD

By Order No. L- 20012 / 17/2003 - IR (C - I ) Dated 27-6-2003, the Central Government in the Ministry ofLabour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub -section (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

" Whether the demand of the RCMS from the management of BCCL, Sijua area to regularise Sri Md . Siraj as Telephone Operator w.e.f. 12-7-1996 is proper and justified ? If so , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled ?"

By order No.L-20012/ 88 /2000-(C-I ) dated 7-9-2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

"Whether the action of the management in not regularising Shri Kedar Singh as Astt . Store Keeper isjustified? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from what date ?" 2. In this case the concerned workman , Md. Siraj filed a petition stating that to pass a ' No Dispute ' Award and Shri N.G. Arun , union representative made his endorsement over the petition that he has got no objection if a ' No Dispute ' Award is passed in this case Shri D. K. Verma, Advocate of the management has get no objection to this.

Accordingly, I pass a ' No Dispute ' Award in the present reference case .

2. This reference case was received in this Tribunal on 25-9-2000 . Thereafter inspite of sending notice to the sponsoring union by speed post, none appeared on behalf ofthe concerned workman for filling written statement. Thiscase is pending since 2000 and so it is needless to keep this case pending further.

H. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

Insuch circumstances , I render a ' No Dispure ' Award inthis reference case .

नई दिल्ली, 10 अगस्त, 2009

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 11 अगस्त, 2009 का.आ. 2435.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नं. -1, धनबाद, के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 252/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-08-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-20012/88/2000- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ]

का. आ. 2436.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार डब्ल्यू.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 147/1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जोकेन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-08-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था। स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 10th August, 2009

[सं. एल-22012/551 / 1996- आई आर ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी S.O. 2435. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central

3056Gl/00-10 5138

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009 /BHADRA 14, 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] New Delhi , the 11th August, 2009

S.O. 2436. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 147of 1997) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court Jabalpur. as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of WCL and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 11-8-2009.

also indicates the date of birth as 2-3-45 . It is further stated that as per National Coal Wage Agreement - III , Implementation Instruction No. 76 , the date ofbirth will be treated as authentic as per Mining Sardar's Certificate . The School Leaving Certificate of the workman also shows that hisdate of birth is 2-3-1945 . It is stated that in the service records form, the workman had simply signed and he did not know English as such he had no knowledge as to what date of birth was entered into the service record . On these grounds, it is submitted that the reference be answered in hisfavour .

[No. L- 22012/551 / 1996- IR(C- 11 ) ]

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT IINDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/ 147 /97

Presiding Officer : Shri Mohd. Shakir Hasan

The President,

Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Panchayat (HMS) ,

Shobhapur Colony; Qr.No.635, Pathakhera Area,

...Workman/Union

PostPathakhera , Distt. Betul (MP)

Versus

General Manager ,

Western Coalfields Limited,

Pathakhera Area ,

Post Pathakhera, Distt . Betul ( MP)

...Management

3. The non -applicant/management appeared and contested the case by filing Written Statement. The case ofthe non -applicant , inter alia, is that the workman Fauda Kahar was working as Underground Loader in Damua Colliery of ECL, PO Kali Paharia, Distt. Burdwan fromwhere he was transferred to Shohhapur colliery of WCL , Pathakhera Area . The Last Pay Certificate was also sent to theManager , Shobhapur colliery with the entire particulars ofthe workman duly signed by the authorities . The Service Register and Form B Register are bound to be maintained by the management under Mines Rules Regulations and the same are signed by the employee . It is stated that under Coal Mines Provident Fund Scheme , the declaration Form in Form - A has to be submitted by the workman and in all those registers and documents , the date of birth is entered as 1-7-37 and the documents also bear the signature of the workman . It is stated that the workman does not have any authentic and admissible record to support his date of birth as2-3-1945 . Therefore he has been rightly retired from service on 1-7-1997 . It is submitted that the workman is not entitled to any relief.

AWARD

Passed on this 21st day of July-2009

4. On the basis of the pleadings of both the parties , the following issues arise for adjudication-

(i) Whether the date ofbirth of the workman Fauda Kaharis 1-7-1937 or 2-3-1945 ?

1. TheGovernment of India , Ministry of Labour vide itsNotification No. L-22012/551 /96- IR(C- II) dated 29-5-97 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:

(ii) Whether the action of the management of Pathakhera Area of WCL in denying to accept the date ofbirth as 2-3-1945 is legal andjustified?

5. Issue No. 1

"Whether the action of the management of Pathakhera Area of WCL in denying to accept the date of birth ofSh. Fauda Kahar as recorded in the Mining Sirdar's Certificate i.e. 2-3-45 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled ? "

To prove the case, both the parties have adduced oral and documentary evidence . To appreciate the dispute ofthe parties, firstly, Implementation Instruction No. 76 (Exhibit A-6) may be seen which reads as follows

"(A) Determination of the age at the time of appointment

(i) Matriculates

2. The case of the applicant in short is that the workman was working as Mining Sirdar at Shobhapur colliery ofWestern coalfied, Pathakhera area . He received an order dated 31-12-96 (Exhibit A- 1 ) that on attaining the age of 60 years , he was going to retire on 30-6-97 . It is stated that his date of birth is 2-3-1945 and as such he had to retire on 1-3-2005 . The date of birth as 1-7-1937 was wrongly entered in the service book. It is stated that in Sirdar'sCertificate issued under Mining Act , the date of birth is 2-3-1945 . The Identity Card issued by the authority

In the case of appointees who have passed Matriculation or equivalent examinations , the date ofbirth recorded in the said certificate shall be treated as correct date of birth and the same will not be altered under any circumstances .

5139 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/भाद्र 14, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(ii) Non-matriculates but educated-

In the case of appointees who have pursued studies in a recognised educational institution , the date of birth recorded in the School Leaving Certificate, shall be treated as correct date of birth and the same will not be altered under any circumstances .

(iii)

(iv) Illiterate-

thathis date of birth is 2-3-45 . The learned counsel for the management referred B ( i)(a) of the Instruction No. 76 and argued that admittedly he was existing employee and such certificate should be issued prior to the date ofemployment and it should be issued by the department of Public Instruction . It is submitted that the said certificate (Exhibit A/5) doesnot show that the department of Public Instruction had endorsed the said School Leaving Certificate . It is true that School Leaving Certificate was issued while he was in service and it was not endorsed by the department of Public Instruction but I feel that it is a document of corroborative value.

In the cases of appointees not covered under the foregoing clauses , the date of birth will be determined bythe Colliery Medical Officer keeping in view any documentary and other relevant evidence as produced by the appointee . Date of birth as determined shall be treated as correct date ofbirth and the same will not be altered under any circumstances .

(B) Review/determination of date of birth in respect of existing employees-

(i) (a) In the case of the existing employees Matriculation Certificate or Higher Secondary Certificate issued bythe recognised Universities or Board or Middle Pass Certificate issued by the Board of Education and/ or Department of Public Instruction and admit cards issued by the aforesaid Bodies should be treated as correct provided they were issued by the said Universities /Boards/ Institutions prior to the date of employment .

6. The another document filed by the workman is Mining Sirdar's Certificate which is marked as Exhibit A/3. The said certificate appears to have been issued under the Coal . Mines Regulations , 1957 by the independent body. The said certificate shows that his date of birth is 2-3-1945 . The learned counsel for the workman also referred B( i ) (b) Similarly Mining Sirdarship , where the Manager had to certify the date of birth , will be treated as authentic . It is argued that Exhibit A/ lis an admitted document by which he was informed by the management about the date of retirement . The said letter shows that the workman was Mining Sirdar . This itself shows that his Sirdar's Certificate was recognized by the Manager as such he was working asMining Sirdar . The Learned Counsel also raised another very important circumstances that management document Form -B which is marked M/2 also shows that the date of birth i.e. 2-3-1945 is also recorded in the Form B. This shows that the management has also recognized the Sirdar's Certificate of the workman and only then the date of birth as 2-3-1945 is also entered in Form - B and also promoted him to the post of Mining Sirdar . This document is also the basis of determining the date of birth and it establishes that the date of birth of the workman is 2-3-1945 .

(b) Similarly, Mining Sirdarship , Winding engine or similar other statutory certificates where the Manager had to certify the date of birth will be treated as authentic .

Provided that where both documents mentioned in (i )(a) and (i )( b ) above are available, the date of birth recorded in (i) (a) will be treated as authentic.

7. The learned counsel for the management argued thatthe Instruction shows that where the Manager certifies the certificate and then it will be treated as authentic . It is submitted that the certificate does not show that it was certified by the Manager . I do not agree with the view of the learned counsel for the management , specially the circumstances discussed above clearly shows that it was recognised by the management and also by the Manager as such he was working as Mining Sirdar. The reason of the management is not acceptable.

(ii) Where ever there is no variation in records, such cases will not be reopened unless there is a very glaring and apparent wrong entry brought to the notice ofthe management . The management after being satisfied on the merits of the case shall make appropriate action for correction to the Age Determination Committee/Medical Board ."

Inthe instant case , the workman has filed the School Leaving Certificate which is marked as Exhibit A/ 5 . This shows that while he was in Class - VIII , he left the school on 30-3-57 . The date of birth as in the Certificate is 2-3-1945 issued on 2-9-76 . The instruction No. 76 says that for non- matriculate but educated , the date of birth record in the School Leaving Certificate shall be treated as correct date of birth. It is argued on behalf of the workman that the Instruction No. 76 also supports his contention and proves

8.Another document filed by the workman is Identity Cardwhich is marked as Exhibit A/4 which appears to have beenissued by WCL, Pathakhera Area . The original I Card also shows that it was signed by the Issuing Authority. This cardwas issued by the management/non - applicant . It shows that the date of birth is recorded as 2-3-45 . The management witness C.C.Pandey has admitted in evidence at para- 14 that Exhibit - A/4 I Card has been issued for identification of the workman but he has wrongly stated that it doesnot bear the signature of any Officer . Exhibit 5140

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5, 2009 /BHADRA 14, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] A/4 shows that it bears the signature of issuing authority and the date of birth as 2-3-1945 is recorded on I -Card . This is admittedly a document of the management . This I Card also establishes that the date of birth of the workman is 2-3-1945 .

birth as 1-7-1937 specially when there was variation in the record of management . It is clear that there was clear violation ofnatural justice . It is not out of place to say that Instruction No. 76 also provides in B(b )( ii) that when there is no variation in records , such cases will not be re - opened but inthe instance case, there was variation in the record of the management, even then the management had not reviewed and had not given any opportunity to the workman to prove his date of birth .

9. Now let us examine the oral and documentary evidence adduced by the management. The management has filed Service Register which is marked as Exhibit M/1 , Form B , a statutory record is maintained under Mines rules, which is marked as Exhibit M/2, Declaration form in Form -A submitted by the workman under Coal Mine provident Fund ( in short CMPF ) Scheme which is marked as Exhibit M/3 . The Last Pay Certificate on his transfer from Damua Colliery to WCL , Pathakhera Area is also filed which is marked as Exhibit A/ 4 and A/5 . The Service Excerpts was submitted by the workman duly signed by him which is marked as Exhibit A/6 .

10. It is argued by the counsel of the management that entire records as has been filed shows that the date of birth is 1-7-1937 . It is also submitted that it is admitted by the workman . It is clear that the workman has admitted that he had signed over all those documents and registers filed by the management but it is challenged that he had knowledge of the entry of those documents and registers as the same were written in English and he admittedly doesnot know English . It is urged that there is nothing on the record to show that the same were read over and explained to the workman and then it was signed. Moreover the document of the management Form B a statutory record . It is said to have been prepared under Mines rules , which is Exhibit M/ 2 . This shows that the date ofbirth as 2-3-1945 is also recorded .

13.Another aspect is also necessary to be examined. That what was the basis of recording the date ofbirth in the record and registers of the management . Except Form B (Exhibit M/2) none ofthe register or record shows the basis onwhich the date ofbirth of 1-7-1937 was recorded . Form-B (Exhibit M -2) shows that the date of birth i.e. 1-7-1937 is recordedon the basis of service record and CMPF Record . It appears that there was no basis of recording the age as 1-7-1937 in the service record and CMPF record . It is argued on behalf of the counsel of the management that on the basisofdeclaration ofthe workman date ofbirth as 1-7-1937 wasrecorded. Firstly there is nothing on the record 10 show that on the basis of the declaration of the workman , the date ofbirth as 1-7-1937 was recorded . Secondly one cannot say his own age. Now let us see the Instruction No. 76 wherein at Para- A( iv) , it is stated that in case of appointees who are illiterate , the date of birth will be determinedby the Colliery MedicalOfficer and the same shall be treated as correct date ofbirth. Admittedly the date of birth i.e. 1-7-1937 was not recorded on the basis ofdetermination ofthe Medical officer . Form -B (Exhibit M/2) further shows that the date ofbirth i.e. 2-3-1945 is also recorded in the statutory record on the basis ofSirdar's Certificate . This date ofbirth is acceptable as it is recorded under the Instruction No.76 .

14. The learned counsel for the management have referred the order dated 25-6-97 passed in MP No. 336/92 by the Hon'ble high Court of MP, the order dated 22-3-01 passed in W.P.No. 18/2000 in the case of Shri Sunil and others versus Shiv Narayan Upadhyay are not applicable inthe instant case . As in this case , there is variation in the record of the management itself and without giving opportunity to the workman , arbitrarily retired him on 1-7-1997 . Accordingly this issue is decided in favour of the workman and against the management ..

15. Issue No.2:

11. It is argued that when his own statutory record also shows that the date of birth is also 2-3-1945 . Then as to why the work was not noticed to retire on the basis of date ofbirth of 2-3-1945 . The notice of retirement (Exhibit A/l ) doesnot show that the management had rejected to. consider the date of birth of 2-3-1945 which was recorded in his statutory record Form B ( Exhibit M /2 ) . The management witness Shri C.C.Pandey in his evidence at para- 9 has also admitted that except Form B register and Form A declaration submitted to the CMPF , there is no variation in any of the documents . This itself shows that there was variation of date of birth in the records of the management . As such , the management record on the point of date of birth was not reliable .

12. It is surprising that there was variation in the records of the management about the date of birth of the workman Fauda Kahar but the management without reviewing and without determining the correct date ofbirth, arbitrarily considered the date of birth as 1-7-1937 and passed order of retirement by 1-7-97. It is an admitted fact that no show cause notice was also asked by the management to the workman for considering the date of

On the basis ofthe discussion made above , it is clear that the management has arbitrarily acted against the workman and therefore he was not legal and justified in denying to accept the date of birth as 2-3-1945. Now the workman has already crossed the age of superannuation , as such the workman Fauda Kahar is only entitled for monetary benefits . The management is directed to pay the back wages from 1-7-97 to 31-3-2005 and all retirement benefits accrue . On 31-3-2005 as if he had retired on 31-3-2005 . This issue is also answered in favour of the workman and against the management .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

16. In view of the above direction , the award is passed in favour of the applicant/ workman and against the management with costs of Rs.5000 ( Five Thousand only) .

17. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 12 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2437. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं डब्ल्यू. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नागपुर , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 40/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-08-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [सं. एल-22012/170/2003- आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 12th August, 2009

S.O. 2437.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 40/ 2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Nagpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Dhoptala Sub Area of WCL, and their workmen , which was received bythe Central Government on 12-8-2009.

[No. L-22012/170/2003 - IR(CM - II) ]

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI A.N. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM - LABOUR COURT , NAGPUR Case No.CGIT/NGP/40/2004

Date: 27-7-2009.

Shri Lomesh Khartad,

Petitioner/ PartyNo.1

: General Secretary, National Colliery WorkersCongress , Dr. Ambedkar Nagar, Ballarpur , Chandrapur (onbehalf of Shri Dharmanarayan Rambhajan)

Versus

: The Sub-Area Manager ,

Respondent/ PartyNo.2

Dhoptala Sub -Area of WCL, PO Sasti , Tah . Rajura, Dist . Chandrapur (M.S. )

AWARD

Dated: 27th July, 2009

1. The Central Government after satisfying the existence ofdispute between Shri Lomesh Khartad , General Secretary, National Colliery Workers Congress , Chandrapur

5141

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/ भाद्र 14, 1931

(onbehalfof Shri Dharmanarayan Rambhajan) (Party No.I) and the Sub -Area Manager , Dhoptala Sub -Area of WCL , Chandrapur (M.S.) (Party No.2) referred the same for adjudication to this Tribunal vide its letter No.L- 22012/ 170/2003 /IR (CM- II) dated 25-2-2004 under clause ( d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub -section (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 [ 14 of 1947] with the following schedule .

2."Whether the action of the management in relation to Dhoptala Sub Area of Western Coalfields Ltd. , in terminating the services ofShri Dharmanarayan Rambhajan, Loader vide Office Order No. वेकोलि/बक्षे/साका/45-B/ 1065 dated 19-11-2002 is legal and justified? Ifnot , to what relief the workman is entitled ? "

3. The General Secretary, Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Congress (RCMC) Union has raised the dispute of Mr. Dharmnarayan Rambhajan before the ALC that the Petitioner was working as a Loader and on failing of the conciliation proceeding , the Government had referred it to the CGIT. During the pendency ofthe dispute i.e. reference No.40/2004 on 27-7-2009 both the parties settled it amicably outside the Court . They arrived at following certain conditions.

Terms and Conditions:

I. Shri Dharmnarayan Rambhajan will be re -employed afresh as General Mazdoor in Cat- I for underground mine and he will be paid initial basis ofCat. 1 (UG) in BallarpurArea.

2. Such re -employment will be subject to medical fitness so certifiedby the Company Doctor .

3. Shri Dharmanarayan Rambhajan shall remain on probation for a period of one year from the date of joining andhe has to put in minimum 190 days of attendance in a year. In case his attendance and general performance is not found satisfactory by the management, his services shall automatically stand terminated without any enquiry or assigning any reason thereof.

4. Shri Dharmnarayan Rambhajan shall be entitled only for continuity of service for the limited purpose of gratuity and this will be a full and final settlement . Further, the benefit of continuity of service will not be extended in such case where the person has been paid gratuity payment . This shall be full & final settlement and no further claim what so ever shall be made in future .

5. The period from the date of his termination till re- employment and joining on his duty will be treated asdies-non on the principle of no work no pay.

6. Form H settlement individually or through union, incorporating the above terms and conditions for [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] 5142

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5, 2009 /BHADRA 14 , 1931

Versus

entering into employment and the same will be sent for registration to the Labour machinery .

: The Sub-Area Manager ,

Respondent/

PartyNo. 2

Ballarpur Colliery 3 and 4 pits of Westem Coalfield Limited, Post & Tah . Ballarpur , Dist . Chandrapur (M.S. )

AWARD

7. In case any dispute is pending before the CGIT, the re- employed person should withdraw the same from CGIT by filing a copy of Settlement for consent award . If any matter is pending before any other courts, the union- ex -employee will withdraw the case from the concerned court .

Dated: 31st July, 2009

8. He shall have no right to apply for VRS at later stage.

They agreed it before the Court by filing the pursis and requested for the Award in that terms . I accepted it and recorded the compromise Award in the terms of it . Consequently , there remained no dispute due to the compromise .Hence , this no dispute Award.

Date:27-07-2009.

A. N. YADAV , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 12 अगस्त , 2009

1. The Central Government after satisfying the existence of dispute between the President , Rashtriya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Sangh ( INTUC) , Chandrapur ( on behalf of Shri Sunil Fakru Popatkar ) (Party No.1 ) and the Sub-Area Manager, Ballarpur Colliery 3 and 4 pits of Western Coalfield Limited, Chandrapur (M.S. ) (Party No. 2) referred the same for, adjudication to this Tribunal vide its letter No.L - 22012 / 15 /2007 - IR ( CM - II ) dated 26-6-2007 under clause (d) of sub section ( 1 ) and sub Section (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) with the following schedule.

2. "Whether the action of the management ofWCL in dismissing Shri Sunil Fakru Popatkar w.e.f. 18-02-2003 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled?"

का.आ. 2438.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं डब्ल्यू. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नागपुर , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 35/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-08-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/ 15 /2007- आई. आर. ( सीएम-11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 12th August, 2009

3. The President , Rashtriya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Sangh ( INTUC ) Union has raised the dispute of Shri Sunil Fakru Popatkar before the ALC and on failing of the conciliation proceeding , the Government had referred it to the CGIT - cum Labour Court . During the pendency of the dispute i.e. reference No. 35/2007 on 14-7-2009 both the parties settled it amicably outside the Court . They arrived atfollowing certain conditions .

Terms and Conditions:

1. Shri Sunil Fakru Popatkar will be re -employed afresh as General Mazdoor in Cat- l for underground mine and he will be paid initial basic of Cat . I [ UG ] in BallarpurArea.

S.O. 2438. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 35/ 2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Ballarpur Coillery 3/4 Pits of WCL , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 12-8-2009.

[No. L- 22012/ 15/2007- IR( CM- 11 )]

2. Such re -employment will be subjeci to medical fitness so certified by the Company Doctor.

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRIA.N . YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM - LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR

Date: 31-7-2009.

Case NO.CGIT /NGP / 35 /2004

: The President ,

3. Shri Sunil Fakru Popatkar shall remain on probation for a period ofone year from the date ofjoining and he has to put in minimum 190 days of attendance in a year . In case his attendance and general performance is not found satisfactory by the management, his services shall automatically stand terminated without any enquiry or assigning any reason thereof.

Rashtriya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor

Petitioner / PartyNo.1

4. Shri Sunil Fakru Popatkar shall be entitled only for continuity of service for the limited purpose of gratuity and this will be a full and final settlement.

Sangh ( INTUC ) , New Miner Quarter 79/2, Post : Ballarpur , Chandrapur (onbehalf of Shri Sunil Fakru

Popatkar) 5143

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Industrial Dispute No. 82/2006 5. The period from the date of his termination till re- employment andjoining on his duty will be treated as dies - non on the principle of no work no pay .

(Inthe matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Neyveli Lignite

Corporation Ltd. and their Workman)

BETWEEN

6. Form-H settlement individually or through union , incorporating the above terms and conditions for entering into employment and the same will be sent for registration to the Labour machinery.

Sri Francis Priyara

: 1stParty/Petitioner

Vs.

TheDirector ( Personnel )

: I Party/Respondent

Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. , Neyveli , Neyveli-607 801 .

7. Dispute is pending before the CGIT, the re- employed person will withdraw the same from CGIT by filing a copy of Settlement for consent award . If any matter is pending before any other courts , the union- ex- employee will withdraw the case from the concerned court also .

APPEARANCE

8. He shall have no right to apply for VRS at later stage.

For the Petitioner Union : M / s . Ajay Khose , V. Porkodi

:M/s. N.A.K. Sarma ,

For the Management

N. Nithianandan

AWARD

They agreed it before the Court by filing the pursis and requested for the Award in that terms . I accepted it and recorded the compromise Award in the terms of it . Consequently, there remained no dispute due to the compromise . Hence , this no dispute Award.

Date: 31-07-2009.

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour viae its Order No. L-22012/347/2005- IR (CM - II) dated 13-9-2006 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication.

A. N. YADAV , Presiding Officer

The schedule mentioned in that order is :

नई दिल्ली , 12 अगस्त, 2009

"Whether the demand of the workman , Shri Francis Priyara for reinstatement with back wages, continuity of service and all attendant benefits from the management of Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. is legal and justified ? If so , to what relief the workman is entitled?"

का.आ. 2439.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं एन.एल.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, चैन्नई , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 82/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -22012/347/2005- आई. आर. ( सीएम- II ) ]

2- After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as 82/2006 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their respective counsel and filed their Claim , Counter and Rejoinder Statement as the case may be .

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 12th August, 2009

3. The averments in the Claim Statement briefly are asfollows :

S.O. 2439. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 82 of2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Neyveli Lignite Corp. Ltd. , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 12-8-2009 .

[No. L-22012/347/2005 - IR(CM- II) ]

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Wednesday, the 5th August, 2009 Present : A. N. Janardanan , Presiding Officer

The petitioner who joined serviced under Neyveli Lignite Corporation doing business of mining of lignite and power generation , regularized on 1-2-1981 and later promoted successively as Industrial Worker Grade - II on 1-2-1981 , Grade - I on 1-2-1987, as Operator on 15-7-1987 , Grade- IV on 1-8-1998, Grade- III (C) , II( b) and I (a) in 1992, 1993 and 1998 , by then with 23 years of long service was dismissed from service . His shift in charge had always been hostile with ill-treatment twards him in relation to his work. On 1-10-2000 , he was denied half a day leave in spite ofbeing for genuine reason . On 2-10-2000 when he was on leave at about 1420 hrs . he had occasioned to be in his office tocomplain about the denial of leave he was forcibly taken to Government Hospital subjected to medical examination for drunkenness and thereafter spared . He was suspended on 3-10-2000 and charge sheeted on 18-10-2000 alleging that at 1330 hrs . on 1-10-2000, ( i ) he did not carry out his work , ( ii ) he used un -parliamentary words against his superiors . ( iii) he manhandled his 5144

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5, 2009/BHADRA 14 , 1931

co-workers and (iv) he was in a drunken condition and mis- conducted himself against Standing Orders 46( i ) (X ) (XXXV) and (XXXVIII). In his three explanations he denied the charges without considering which an enquiry was commenced on 9-2-2002 and concluded on 12-12-2003 . Enquiry was not conducted in a fair and proper manner . In the enquiry report dated 8-3-2004 , Charge nos . (i), ( ii) , (iii ) were held proved and charge no. ( iv) not proved. To the finding he submitted explanation on 15-07-2004 denying them . He also gave explanation on 27-8-2004 . A show cause notice proposing dismissal dated 6-8-2004 was issued . On 30-10-2004 , he was dismissed which was confirmed by the Appellate Authority on 10-2-2005 . Industrial Dispute raised before the Assistant Commissioner of Labour ( Central ) having failed the reference is occasioned . The charges were vague. Who was the superior against whom un - parliamentary words were used not mentioned, who was the co- worker manhandled not mentioned . Complaints allegedly lodged by P. Chandresan and G. V. Ramachandran were not given to him which prejudiced him , no fair opportunity to cross- examine the witnesses was given . The Enquiry Officer acted as a prosecutor , cross - examined the petitioner and acted in a biased manner . The Enquiry Officer allowed Second Party to reopen the enquiry without notice to petitioner and stepped into the shoes of the Respondent. Two independent and material witnesses were not examined. The Appellate Authority proceeded as if the petitioner admitted the charges in his explanation . Even if admitted and if enquiry is still held charges should be proved . The Respondent acted not bona fide , in unfair labour practice and in factual and legal victimization. The punishment is shockingly disproportionate . He was not given proper opportunity to submit his explanation as regards past record which Disciplinary Authority took into account before dismissal. The enquiry is vitiated and the finding is perverse . It is against the principles of natural justice and Standing Orders . Hence the reference .

4. The allegations in the Counter Statement briefly stated are as follows :

tary words at his superiors and manhandled co - worker in drunken condition . In one of the three explanations , he admitted altercation to have had taken place with G. V. Ramachandran on 02-10-2000 over and above explaining hisfamily problems , health, etc. as reasons for the incident assuring non - recurrence of it in future upon which the suspension was revoked . Though in the explanation dated 28-10-2000 , he impliedly admitted misconduct . On 30-12-2000 , retracted his admission in writing which is un- der an afterthought . A departmental enquiry was con- ducted in which full opportunity was given to him with a defence assistant allowing him the opportunity to cross- examine the witnesses examined by the Respondent and allowing him also to examine one Selvaraj which enquiry proceedings were not objected to by him . In the enquiry charges except drunkenness were proved. He was given copy of the report to which objection was filed on 15-07-2004 . He was issued show cause notice and commu- nicated proposed punishment of removal from service with- out notice or pay under Standing Order - 47 . The petitioner has had antecedent records of bad service like a demotion , warning etc , for rash driving of van , unauthorized erection of sheds in his quarters . The allegations against his supe- riors or coworkers are false . Leave is not a matter of right and whenever leave has been denied to the petitioner, it has been on exigencies of service . It is incorrect that the Enquiry Officer stepped into the shoes of the Respondent. Sri Ravichandran was examined as management witness on the request of the petitioner as revealed from the enquiry proceedings . The petitioner never sought for copy of complaints during enquiry proceedings and he is estopped from alleging to the contra. In the explanation dated 28-10-2000 of the petitioner it could be read that he had attributed his family health and work circumstances as the causes for his misconduct in question that he assured not to allow recurrence of such misconduct and he pleaded for revocation of suspension and dropping of disciplinary proceedings . They amount to implied admission of his mis- conduct. The action against the petitioner is bona fide and in accordance with the Standing Orders , principles of natural justice and fair play . There is no unfair labour practice, factual or legal victimization practiced on him . His shocking act of insubordination, use of abusive and un- parliamentary languages , manhandling of supervisory staff, shouting at superiors , eroding the discipline are acts not to be softly dealt with . The punishment imposed is propor- tionate to the gravity of the misconduct . To prove the charges his past blemished record has not been placed as material relied upon . The claim is to be dismissed.

5. The substance of the rejoinder averments is as follows:

The petitioner while was working as Driver in pick- up transport vehicle service of mini - auto division , Mine - I in 2000 at 1345 hrs . on 02-10-2000 Shift- Incharge having had reasonable doubt of he being intoxicated refused to allot duty and petitioner behaved riotously towards Chandresan , Shift- Incharge . The petitioner used un- parliamentary words towards G. V. Ramachandran and manhandled him . So he was denied to be engaged as he was in a violent mood and intoxicated stage to do the job involving safe transport of workmen inside the mines and he was got medically checked up to ascertain the intoxica- tion. On complaints of the above persons , the petitioner was suspended on 03-10-2000 and thereafter charge sheeted on 18-10-2000 charging him to have had not car- ried out his allotted work and to have used un-parliamen-

It isrelying on adverse past record without hearing petitioner that dismissal order was passed . The past record was not mentioned in the Second Show Cause Notice so disabling him to explain . Against past adverse actions 5145

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/भाद्र 14, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

against him, ID has been raised before Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) and is pending .

6. Points for consideration are :

(i) Whether the demand for reinstatement with back wages, continuity of service and all attendant benefits of the petitioner is legal and justified ?

9. Evidently, this is a case in which the petitioner admitted his misconduct to a certain extent in his written explanation dated 28-10-2000 in which he has delineated his family health and working circumstances as the causative factors for the misconduct of course which was thereafter retracted upon which was the enquiry proceed- ings started against him.

(ii) To what relief the petitioner is entitled?

7. The evidence in this ID consists of testimony of WW1 and Ex. WI to Ex . W8 on the petitioner's side and on the Respondent's side MW1 and Ex . MI to Ex . M21 of which Ex. Ml to Ex. M19 were marked on consent.

Point No. 1

10. As already mentioned by me above the pertinent question is whether the misconducts based incidents have actuallytaken place . The learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that on the date of alleged incident the workman was actually not on duty. Still admittedly he was to his workplace on that day. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner , the enquiry is not fair and the finding is perverse . Going by the enquiry proceedings , it could be found that the petitioner did not object to the mode of enquiry and he fully participated in it . He cross- examined the management witness and got a witness examined for himself. Though the couching charge phraseology looks a bit vague in the absence of necessary details , it is not such an extent as to render it difficult for the petitioner to meet and defend it . Though the petitioner may or may not have been on leave on 2-10-2000 , it is evident that he came to the premises of the Respondent . When he was certainly at the place and the alleged inci- dent of using un - parliamentary words to superiors and manhandling of colleagues is actually proved happened , the mere mentioning of the said incident without stating the names of victim persons is not to be read as material . The fact that the allegedly used un - parliamentary words have not been mentioned in the charge sheet assumes importance for the reason that the same should have been confronted to the petitioner from the very inception who has been indicted for the words which if not exactly put before him an objective finding cannot be reached by the fact finding body. In other words if a changed version is given thereafter on the ill -motive of the accuser it is quite to the prejudice ofthe workman . Therefore , non-mention- ing of the unparliamentary words is prejudicial to the peti- tioner . The charge that the petitioner was drunk and there- fore under its influence admittedly does not stand proved for want of medical report . The proved non - supply of the copies of the complaints of Chandresan and G. V. Ramachandran lodged against the petitioner was allegedly for the reason that the petitioner did not want it . The said reason is not a palatable one for the reason that in spite of the petitioner not asking for it , it should have been supplied to him . But , that perse is not a ground to hold that the enquiry has not been proper or fair . There is also noth- ing to show that in fact the petitioner was thereby preju- diced in his defence . Discernibly, the petitioner partici- pated in the enquiry well. The finding that the petitioner was put on duty on 2-10-2000 and that he did not perform hisduty is proved. According to the petitioner he was on leave but according to the Respondent he was on duty.

8.Here is a case of an individual workman espoused by himself against his moval from service on some misconduct for reinstatement with back wages and attendant benefits . It is argued on his behalf that out of the four charges levelled against him , the fourth one, drunken- ness has not been proved . The other charges are that ( i ) on 01-10-2000 , he did not carry out his work ( ii ) he used un- parliamentary words towards his superiors and ( iii ) he man- handled his co- workers . His contentions against the charges are that they were vague for the reason that the superiors against whom un - parliamentary words were used or the co -worker manhandled by him as alleged have not beennamed . His contention that copies of complaints al- legedly given by Chandresan and G. V. Ramachandran were not given to him and thereby prejudiced him is met by the Respondent saying that in fact the petitioner did not want the same . To the case of the petitioner that the enquiry was not held in a fair and proper manner and was against the principles of natural justice and also that Respondent did not examine independent material witnesses the stand of the Respondent is that the petitioner was given full oppor- tunity with a Defence Assistant allowing him opportunity to cross - examine witnesses and also himself allowing examination of his witness . The petitioner has not had any objection regarding the enquiry or the manner of the enquiry in which it went through , Respondent argues . They also deny that the Enquiry Officer was biased. Further, according to the Respondent the petitioner impliedly admitted in his explanation dated 28-10-2000 that the mis- conduct attributed was due to his family health and work circumstances as the causative factor thereto also under- taking not to allow a recurrence of the same and further instantaneously pleading for revocation of suspension and disciplinary action . There is no unfair labour practice or any victimization practised on him . The petitioner assails his punishment as shockingly disproportionate and as with- out giving opportunity to submit explanation as against pastrecord which according to him Disciplinary Authority took into account before the punishment but which is de- nied by the Respondent . According to the Respondent the past record has not been considered for the punishment .

3056 G1 /09-11 5146

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5, 2009/BHADRA 14, 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

basis of some satisfactory evidence that the finding has been entered into by the Enquiry Officer . There is no reason to assail it as perverse . In other words there is no any infirmity attached to the enquiry proceedings or the finding arrived at except as to the charge that the petitioner used un -parliamentary words towards his superior . With- out the exact words spoken being actually stated even at the outset and thereafter brought home , it cannot be con- clusively said that the words used by the petitioner were ofsuch a nature as to characterize them as unparliamentary . Itispertinent to note that the petitioner impliedly admitted his blameworthy conduct in his written explanation dated 28-10-2000 pursuant to which his suspension was revoked without prejudice to the departmental enquiry. The said enquiry went well and the same was held fairly and proerly . There need not be any hesitation to hold that the enquiry and the findings are fair and proper and are not vitiated except regarding allegation as to the use of unparliamentary words. Therefore , the finding ofthe Enquiry Officer except to that extent is only to be sustained and so ordered .

What is discernible is that the petitioner was to the place of Respondent . It was at that time the alleged incident took place . The noting of "PH " in the Attendance Register on the particular day against the name of the petitioner is with a cogent explanation placed before this Tribunal . It could be found that the petitioner was actually on duty on that day, buthe refused . Therefore , charge of non -performance of duty by the petitioner could be found proved . Being shrouded in mystery as to the exact words alleged spoken , it is difficult to enter a finding that the petitioner used un- parliamentary words as charged against him . It is well to comprehend that the Disciplinary Authority has also taken into account the past record of the petitioner in imposing the punishment whereas his stand is that the same has not been taken into account for the punishment . The specific case of the petitioner is that notice of his past record of bad service was not given to him which is discernibly true . While the Disciplinary Authority clings to his stand that he has not taken into account the past record of the petitioner for the punishment, it could be seen that he did actually take into account the same for the imposed punishment. The punishment is also shockingly disproportionate. The learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the case of The Management of Easwaran and Sons Engineers ( P) Ltd. and III Additional Labour Court of Madras and Another ( 1997 I LLJ 88 ) which reads as fol- lows: " therefore , on the second question argued by Mr. Balasubramanian , we have no hesitation in holding that in this case, the past record of service having been taken into account only for the purpose of imposing the extreme penalty, the order of punishment is vitiated be- cause no notice was given to the worker before taking into account the past record of service to the prejudice of the worker . This is a legal infirmity in the order of dismissal as well as inthe awad of the Labour Court. This legal infirmity is sufficient to interfere with the Judgment of the Labour Court in proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia . "

2. Regarding argument that the punishment is shock- ingly disproportionate, I am of the view that there is some force in the contention . As could be seen from the records the DisciplinaryAuthority took into consideration the past record ofbad service ofthe petitioner for imposing the punishment ofremoval from service . It is without giving the petitioner notice so as to afford him an opportunity to explain his past record of bad service . This is not approved by law as laid downby variousjudicial pronouncements . It is a case in which thepetitioner conducted himself in a disorderly manner due to some unfavourable conditions obtaining in his family and health conditions and workplace situations as expressly ad- mittedbyhim inhis explanation dated 28-10-2000 . There is no prooffor his pathetic conditions . It is not to be totally rejected as untrue. So it is to be discerned that petitioner acted unbe- coming of him towards his superiors under some stress and strain. In his explanation dated 28-10-2000 he has mentioned hismelancholic situations. This is not to be rejected as wholly untrue. Therefore he is to be given a lesser punishment of a minor nature rather than of removal from the service, the one which is presently imposed which is shockingly dispropor- tionate to the gravity ofthe offence . Therefore, I set aside the order ofthe Disciplinary Authority removing him from service invoking Section 11A of the ID Act . On setting aside the punishment of removal from service , he will be reinstated into service with 25% of the backwages ( treating the remainder 75% ofbackwages as the punishment to be given to him) with continuity of service and all other attendant benefits . So ordered.

Point No. 2

3. In the light of above findings, the petitioner is ordered to be reinstated into service with 25 % ofbackwages (treating the remainder 75 % of backwages as punishment) , continuity of service and all other attendant benefits . No order as to costs .

1. There is nothing to find that the enquiry held is not valid or proper. It also does not violate any fundamental principles of natural justice . The alleged vagueness regarding the various elements of the charge is not one prejudicing the delinquent. Therefore , it is not material to affect the validity of the enquiry or the finding . Whether the petitioner uttered un -parliamentary words towards a superior cannot be found sufficiently proved for the reason that the exact words spoken by him were not mentioned in the charge memo . This has a tendency to prejudice the petitioner to meet the charge and set- up his defence . In the absence of the exact words used by the petitioner in the Charge Memo , I am of the view that , that part of the charge cannot be found proved . That the petitioner did not perform his duty allocated to him on 2-10-2000 is also proved. That petitioner was drunk on 2-10-2000 admittedly does not stand proved . It is on the [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/ भाद्र 14, 1931

4. The reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the PA, transcribed and typed by him , cor- rected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 5th August , 2009)

A.N. JANARDANAN, Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined

For the 1st Party/Petitioner : WWI Sri Francis Priyara For the 2nd Party/ Management : MWI Sri G. Thirumurugan Documents Marked

On the Petitioner's side

Ex. No. Date

Description

Ex. WI 05-09-1988 Appreciation certificates by office of the Chief/ Training and Development Training Complex .

Ex. W2

Particulars of overtime, duty doneby the I Party

EX.W3

Advance Particulars

EX.W4

LorryAllotting Register .

EX.W5 04-06-2005 Enquiry Notice by the ACL EX.W6

I.D. raised by the 1 Party EX.W7 31-07-2007 Enquiry notice by the ACL EX.W8

I.D. raised by the 1 Party On theManagement's side

Ex. No. Date

Description

EX.MI 03.10.2000 Suspension Order of M. Francis Priyara

EX.M2

Charge Memo

18.10.2000

EX.M3 18.10.2000 Explanation given by Francis Priyara

EX.M4 28.10.2000 Explanation of M. Francis Priyara EX.M5 28.10.2000 Revocation of Suspension Order EX.M6 30.10.2000 Explanation given by the M. FrancisPriyara

EX.M7 14.-08.2002 Letter addressed to the Enquiry Officer

EX.M8

Enquiry proceedings

EX.M9 21.06.2003 Statement of M. Francis Priyara EX.MIO 09.02.2004 Enquiry Report .

EX.MI1 22.06.2004 Proceedings of II Party EX.M12 24.06.2004

5147 EX.M15 27.08.2004 Explanation given M. Francis Priyara

EX.M16 30.10.2004 Final Order of the Disciplinary Authority

EX.M17 08.11.2004 Order of removal

EX.M18 12.11.2004 Appeal preferred by M. Francis Priyara

EX.M19 10.02.2005 Order of Appellate Authority EX.M20 02.10.2000 Statement of Chandresan EX.M21 02.10.2000 Statement of G. V. Ramachandran

नई दिल्ली, 12 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2440.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं ई.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , आसनसोल , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 92/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [सं. एल-22012/ 114/2006- आई आर ( सीएम-11 ) ]

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 12th August, 2009

S.O. 2440. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 92/2006) of the Central Govemment Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court Asansol as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Bansra Colliery of M/ s . ECL . , and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 12-8-2009 .

[No. L- 22012/ 114/2006- IR (CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

Present : Sri Manoranjan Pattnaik , Presiding Officer Reference No. 92 of 2006

Parties : Industrial Dispute between Management of Bansra Colliery of M /s . ECL , Burdwan. Vrs .

The Vice President , Koyla Mazdoor Congress , Andal , Burdwan.

REPRESENTATIVES

: Sri P.K. Das , Advocate For the Management

Memo of the II Party seeking objections over

Ex.N113 15.07.2004 Explanation given by Francis Priyara

Forthe Union (Workman) : Sri P.C. Panday, Koyla Mazdoor Congress Industry: Coal

EX.M14 06.08.2004 Provisional show cause notice issued by 2nd Party

Sate: West Bengal

Dated the 30-7-2009 .

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009 /BHADRA 14 , 1931

5148

AWARD

Inexercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d ) of sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2 ( 1 ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , Government of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter No.L- 012/ 114/2006 - IR (CM - II ) dated 1-11-2006 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

"Whether action of Management of Bansra Colliery of ECL in dismissing Sri Israil Mia from services w.e.f.6-11-2003 is legal and justified ? Ifnot , to what reliefthe workmen entitled ? "

was prevented from attending duties being prevented by sufficient reason . The Enquiry Officer found his misconduct as there has been delay of about 3 months in joining duties on the part of the workman . It is found that the workman had no opportunity to explain as allegedly he was not given such opportunity to explain during the proceeding by putting question on this specific point and by recording his statement . To this extent enquiry proceeding stand impaired and there is no reason not to accept the version of the workman in this proceeding that due to prolong illness he could not join in duty . The workman admittedly worked under ground which is very often hazardous and causes peculiars illness . It is also not expected that a person will be at once ready to undertake such work soon after he is found fit by the Doctor . Taking into consideration the above facts and circumstances it can safely be concluded that the dismissal of the workman Md . Israil Mia by the management is not justified. In absence of any proofof his lis -pendis gainful employment else where he entitled himself not only the reinstatement in service but also full back wages and consequential benefit . Hence an award passed accordingly.

ORDER

2.On recept the Order No. L-22012/ 114/2006- IR (CM- II ) dated 1-11-2006 of the above mentioned reference from the Government of India , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute , a reference case No. 92 of 2006was registered on 11-12-2006 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post to the parties concerned directing themto appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims . In pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

Let an award as above be and same is passed. Send the copy of the award be sent to the Ministry of Labour and Employment , Government of India , New Delhi .

3. The workman is an employee ofthe Eastern Coal Field Limited (ECL) and worked as U.G. Loader at Bansara Colliery, Kunustoria Area during the relevant period .

MANORANJAN PATTNAIK , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 12 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2441.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं ई.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, असनसोल , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 91/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था। 4. Shun of all details , the case of the workman as averred in this pleading is that due to serious sickness he remained absent in his duties form 13-2-1992 . He was charge-sheeted vide C.S. No. 405 dated 18-3-1993 . He filed all his Medical papers in support of his sickness and participated in the domestic enquiry but was not given opportunity to defend himself and prove his innocence . Violating all normes and principle of natural justice he (the Workman) was dismissed from service from 6-11-1993 on the basis of the finding of the enquiry report .

[सं. एल-22012/373/1998- आई. आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 12th August , 2009 5. The Employer's case in short is denial of the assertion of the workman . The workman failed to explain satisfactory his absence in duties and his alleged misconduct . The workman is a habitual absentee and has beenawarded with punishment earlier .

S.O. 2441.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 91 of 1999 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court Asansol , as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ECL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 12-8-2009 .

[No. L- 22012/373 / 1998-1R(CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer 6. The factual issue simplicitor is that whether the workman's absence in duties w.e.f. 13-2-1992 was willful or was due to sickness which prevented him from attending duties . The workman in his evidence reiterated his plea in the written statement . He is found to have produced the Medical Certificate before the Enquiry Officer as there is a reference to such a Medical Certificate filed by the workman in the enquiry report and copy of the Certificate ext. wi / l is very much in the enquiry proceeding . Neither the managemnt nor the Enquriy Officer has refuted the same. As such facts remain that the workman was infact sick and 5149

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 5, 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL , TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT ASANSOL

Present : Sri Manoranjan Pattnaik , Presiding Officer Reference No. 91 of 1999

Parties : Industrial Dispute between the Management ofDaluraband Colliery .

Vrs .

Their Workman.

REPRESENTATIVES

:Sri P.K. Dass , Advocate For the Management

For the Union ( Workman) : Sri S.K. Panday,

General Secretary, K.M.C. Industry: Coal

Sate: West Bengal Dated the 9-6-2009

AWARD

In exercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2 ( 1 ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , Government of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter No. L - 22012/373 / 1998-1R (CM - 11 ) dated 9-7-1999 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by thisTribunal .

SCHEDULE

"Whether action of Management of Dalurband Colliery of Pandabeswar Area of M / s ECL in dismissing Sri Kedar Bhuiya, Under Ground Loader is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman concerned entitled ? "

2. In response to the summons issued by the Tribunal both the parties appeared through their representatives and filed their respective written statement Sri P.K. Das , Advocate , appeared for the management and Sri S.K. Pandey, General Secretary of the Koyla Mazdoor Congress appeared for the workman . Both the parties contested the dispute .

Shun of all details the case of the workman is that the workman Sri Kedar Bhuiya was a regular employee of Dalurband Colliery of ECL and worked as Under Ground Loader . He was dismissed from his service w.e.f. 3-6-97by Chief General Manager , Pandabeswar Area by his order No.2099 dated 3-6-97 on the ground that the workman remained absent from his duty from 9-8-96 to 3-10-96 .

The case of the management as per averment is that the workman became absent from his duty from 9-8-96 without any prior information to the management and he remained absent till 3-10-96 and the absence of the workman was unauthorized. Considering the unauthorized absence of the workman , a charge- sheet was issued and the workman submitted his reply stating therein that due to his poor health he failed to attend his duty. The further case ofthe management is that considering the poor health of the workman the management took a lenient view and allowed the workman to join his duty after awarding a light punishment but still the workman did not join the dutyand inthe circumstance the management got a regular domestic enquiry conducted in which the Enquiry Officer came to the conclusion that the mis- conduct of the workman was established on the basis of which the management passed the order of dismissal . The further case ofmanagement is that the order of dismissal is justified and there is no scope to inter - fare with the punishment .

The case ofthe workman is that the workman became absent from his duty due to his sickness and as he was undergoing treatment. When he was declared medically fit he reported for his duty but he was not allowed to resume his duty and in the meantime he was served with a charge- sheet and thereafter he was dismissed from service. He did not receive any notice of domestic enquiry and could not get opportunity to defend himself. Later on when the union took up the matter for his reinstatement and the matter was considered in the corporate level in JCC meeting held on 26-9-97 , it was decided that in the first case the worker dismissed on the allegation of absence during past two years may be considered and after examining their case process may be started for reinstatement but lastly the workman was not reinstated . The further case of the union is that the punishment of dismissal is too severe and dis- proportionate for the alleged misconduct.

Onconclusion of hearing an award dated 4-10-2002 was passed but this award is passed afresh pursuant to the order dated 16-8-2004 of the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta passed in W.P. No. 12709 ( W) of 2004. The relevant portion the order as extracted is as follows:

"Therefore, the effectivity of the Award passed by the Presiding Officer be kept in abeyance and will be allowed to proceed as it is or by passing an Award afresh after considering the points which are relevant as directed by this Court as early as possible preferably within a period of3 months from the date of communication ofthis order" .

The long lapse of time in disposal ofthis case which is not in adherence of the Hon'ble Court's order can be attributed to various reasons as reflected in the order sheet but in as much it relates to the present incumbency w.e.f. 2-2-2009 the lapse of time is due to adjournment for convenience of both the parties and on their request .

3. On a careful reading of the order of the Hon'ble Court it is clear that various points are required to be considered now as per the observation of the Hon'ble Court. It has been observed that . Although repeatedly it 5150

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009/BHADRA 14, 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

sufficient and justifiable reason of invoking the provision ofsection II A ofthe I. D. Act . Since his reinstatement has not been objected by the management initially but the management is bent upon and took penal action for non- joining of duties subsequent to its lenient view and order tojoin. In all fitness of things an order for his reinstatement withpunishment will be just and proper . But the action of dismissal of the workman at any rate can not be held as legal and justified in terms of the reference . There having no proofof gainful employment of the workman else where , heisentitled to back wages and service benefit . The minor punishment that is found proper is to stop two increments ofthe workman with cumulative effect and to cut the 50 % of the back wages . An award needs to be passed accordingly.Hence it is ordered.

ORDER

د has been held by the Presiding Officer of the Tribunal that the enquiry held by the Enquiry Officer in absence ofthe workman is justified but there is no reference as regards independent enquiry made by such Presiding Officer to hold that even it is a contested enquiry on the basis of the materials duly collected during the enquiry , then it is valid independently by it without such explanation by further evidence only on the statement made in the written statement at the time of attendance , the workman was absent on ill health ground or not on it any lenient view could have been taken or not, can not be inferred by the Presiding Officer of the Tribunal. Further , it has been observed that the consideration of measurement as disproportionate on punishment has not been reflected in the award . In a sincere bid for consideration of the above points for passing a award afresh both the parties were given opportunity to adduce further evidence but they did not avail it . The learned Advocate for the management and the General Secretary of the concerned union have been heard at length .

Let an award be and same is passed as per above . Copy of the award be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment, Government of India, New Delhi .

MANORANJAN PATTNAIK, Presiding Officer . नई दिल्ली , 12 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2442.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं ई.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , आसनसोल , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 16/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[ सं. एल-22012/257/1997- आई. आर. ( सी- II ) ]

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 12th August, 2009

S.O. 2442. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 16 of 1998 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Asansol , as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ECL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 12-8-2009 .

[ No. L - 22012 /257 / 1997 - IR ( C- 11 ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT ASANSOL

Present : Sri Manoranjan Pattnaik , Presiding Officer 4. Facts remain that the union did not challenge the fairness on the validity of the enquiry proceeding nor the report . It has not alleged any impropriety . The period of absence from duties for the period 9-8-96 to 3-10-96 is an admitted fact . The management has unequivocally admits in their pleading about their knowledge of illenss and the health ofthe workman for which they initially took a lenient view and instead of taking of any action against him allowed him to join on duty after inflecting minor punishment . He was charge- sheeted on his failure to join in duties despite such liberal gesture of the management . The domestic enquiry has been held without active participation of the workman . The facts and circumstance thatwas established in the enquiry has not been contested by the workman at any point of the time. The enquiry report is free from blemish . He all along pleaded his ill health as the reason of his absence in duties and also for not joining in service even after the management took a lenient view and allowed him to join . It is not always expected that a workman will immediately get ready tojoin in duties soon after he recovers from illness . In this case it is the persistent claim that it is the not only the illness but ill health that prevented the workman to join and which is an acknowledged fact . The proceeding of the domestic enquired reveal about observation of formalities leaving no scope for arbitrary violation of rights of the workman. Had it been contested also the facts so established could hardly been altered as the facts of illness have been admitted by both side later on in the proceeding. The alleged misconduct has been proved the management itself took a lenient view and allowed him tojoin inflecting minor punishment . The poor health of the workman that prevented him to join in obedience to the liveral order of the management has , however , not been heeded and dismissal order was slammed on him . As such there is [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

Reference No. 16 of 1998

Parties : Industrial Dispute between Management of Ukhra Regional Workshop of ECL Vrs.

Their Workman .

REPRESENTATIVES

For the Management : Sri P.K. Dass , Advocate For the Union (Workman) : Sri S.K. Panday,

General Secretary , K.M.C. Asansol .

Industry : Coal

5151

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/भाद्र 14 , 1931

he isconsidered as on asset and rendered good service, the management has been ignoring his claim for regular bsorption in Security Service which does not have any financial implication as both the posts i.e. Draftsman and Security Sub - Inspector are of the same grade .

State: West Benga

Dated the7-7-2009

AWARD

Inexercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d) ofsub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , Government of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter No. L -22012 / 257 /1997-1R (CM - 11 ) dated 12-06-1998 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by thisTribunal .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Ukhra Regional Workshop of M/ s . ECL for not regularization Sh . Ajoy Kumar Singh , Draftman as Security Sub - Inspector in Tech . & SupervisoryGr. C islegal and justified ? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled ? "

2. On receipt of the order No. L-22012/257 / 1997 - IR (CM- II ) dated 12-6-1998 of the above mentioned reference from the Government of India , Ministry of Labour , New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute , a reference case No. 16 of 1998 was registered on 25-6-1998 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post to the parties concerned directing them to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims . In pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

3. The case of the workman in short is that he is an employee under the management of Ukhra Regional Workshop of Eastern Coal Fields Ltd. (ECL) . He was initially appointed as a Draftsman. He being an Ex . - service personnel and having aptitude and qualification applied for change ofdiscipline from Draftsman to Security Service and for his appointment as Security Sub- Inspector. Considering his service record in Army the Management deployed him against the job of Sub - Inspector w.e.f. 23-06-1993 . The Chief of Security recommended for his absorption . Despite his continuous working in the Security service and good track record and acknowledged fact that 4. Without refuting the details relating to initial appointment ofthe workman the stand of the management as averred in the written statement is that the workman was authorised to be deployed on day to day basis in Security department vide order U.R. W/PD/93/766, dated 25-6-1993 in addition to his normal duty and as such claim ofregularization of the workman in the said post is illegal and improper . He was deployed in exigencies of the company and as such the workman has no legal and valid claim .

Onperusing the pleadings and evidence both documentary and oral and on having heard both the sides it is found that the factual aspect of the claims of the workman regarding his appointment and deployment in Security depratment etc. and other details on that score have not been refuted by the management at all . The long and continuous deployment of the workman in Security Service since 1993 under a valid order also is an admitted fact . No legal financial impediment exist nor any other reason against the absorption have been advanced. Facts remain that he is an ex - service man and is better suitable for the post which has been acknowdged by the management which is evident from the records . In the above circumstances 1 do not find any reason to justify the action of the management in not regularizing the workman Sh . Ajaya Kumar Singh as Security Sub - Inspector in Tech . & Supervisor Gr . " C" from the date of his deployment against the post and in not granting all service benefits attached to it . Accordingly award is passed to the effect that the workman is entitled to be regularized in the post of Security Sub-Inspector in Tech . & Supervisor Gr . " C " from the date of his deployment with all the service benefits attached to the post.

ORDERED

Let an awarded be and same is passed as above . Send copies of the award to the Ministry of Labour & Employment, Government of India , New Delhi .

MANORANJAN PATTNAIK, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 12 अगस्त , 2009

का.आ. 2443.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार ई.सी. एल के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , असनसोल , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 65/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -22012/322/1998- आई. आर. ( सी -11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी 5152

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009 / BHADRA 14 , 1931

New Delhi , the 12th August, 2009

S.O. 2443. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 65 of 1999) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Asansol , as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ECL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 12-8-2009.

[No. L- 22012/322/ 1998 - IR(C - II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

Present : Sri Manoranjan Pattnaik, Presiding Officer Reference No. 65 of1999

Parties : Industrial Dispute between Management of Madhusudanpur Colliery of ECL, Kajoragram , Bardwan.

Vrs .

Their Workman

REPRESENTATIVES

: Sri P.K. Das , Advocate For the Management

For the Union ( Workman) : None

Industry : Coal State: West Bengal

Dated the 29-6-2009

AWARD

Inexercise of powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , Government of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its Letter No. L -22012/ 322/ 1998 - IR( CM - II) dated 11/ 16-06-1999 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by thisTribunal .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Madhusudanpur Colliery of Kajora Area of ECL in dismissing Sh . Debasish Roy, General Mazdoor is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the workman concerned entitled ?"

2. On receipt of the Order No. L-22012 / 322 / 1998 - IR (CM - II) dated 11 / 16-06-1999 of the above mentioed

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] reference from the Government of India , Ministry of Labour ,New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute , a reference case No. 65 of 1999 was rgistered on 5-7-1999 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post to the parties concerned directing them to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their writrten statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support oftheir claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned .

3. The case of the workman in short is that he (workman) is a permanent employee under the Eastern Coal Fields( ECL ) worked as General Mazdoor at Madhusudanpur Colliery. He remained absent since 5-4-1992 due to his illness . He duly intimated the fact to the management but charge sheet was filed vide C.S.No. NSP/ C-6/24/9/234 dated 19-9-94 . He was dismissed subsequently w.e.f. 15-6-1995 on the basis of the enquiry report of the Enquiry Officer in a fake enquiry . His Medical Certificate was ignored and he was not given opportunity to defend himself challenging the same the workman has raised this Industrial Dispute.

4. Employer's stand in short is that the workman is a habitual absentee and remained absent from duties without permission from 5-4-1997 . He was accordingly charge sheeted for his misconduct U/S 17( i )( d) & ( n) of the model standing order and was dismissed after a domestic enquiry was held and his explanation was found unsatisfactory .

5. Upon going through the pleading & documents and having the learned Advocate for the Employer it is found that the workman is claim that he was ill and that he was pervented from joining his duties and above all he duly intimated the fact to the authority as claimed in the pleading has not been substantiated in any manner as he did not participate in the final hearing on this proceeding nor any evidence was adduced on his behalf. All that is found in the record in support of his plea is the admission theEnquiry Report about submission of Medical Certificate showing his illness . Record shows his attendance in duties onthe previous years very poor. In the above circumstance the action of the Management in dismissing the workman can not be said unjustified and no relief to workman flows down. However , taking into consideration the absence of the workman leaving on health ground the management will do good to take such him into the service on compassionary grounds inflicting any sort of punishment other than dismissal Award needs to be passed as above. Accordingly it is ordered.

ORDER

Let an award be and same is passed as above . Copy of the award be sent to the Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India , New Delhi .

MANORANJAN PATTNAIK, Presiding Officer 5153

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/ भाद्र 14 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 12 अगस्त , 2009

August , 2004 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 A of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether the action of the Management of M / s . Bharat Electronics Ltd. , Taloja in dismissing the services of Sh . S.N. Pawar is legal and Justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?" का.आ. 2444.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारत इलेक्ट्रोनिक्स लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, नं. -2, मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 2/36 ऑफ 2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-42012/268/2003- आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ]

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 12th August, 2009

S.O. 2444.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 2/36 of 2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No.2 , Mumbai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M/s . Bharat Electronics Limited, and their workmen , received by the Central Govemment on 12-8-2009 .

[No. L-42012/268/2003 - IR(CM - II)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI

Present : A. A. Lad , Presiding Officer Reference No. CGIT - 2/36 of 2004

Employers in relation to the management of M/s. Bharat Electronics Ltd.

-First Party

The Executive Director , M/s. Bharat Electronics Ltd. , L- 1, MIDC Industrial Area, Taloja, Tah . Panvel , Distt . Raigad , Raigad (Maharashtra) .

V/ s.

-Second Party

Sh . S. N. Pawar, ST No. T05990 , Walmiki Wadi , Post: Khalaur , Distt . Raigad, Raigad ( Maharashtra ).

APPEARANCES

For the Employer

2. Claim Statement is filed by the concerned workman atExhibit 9 making out the case , that , he was working with the 1st Party as a unskilled I ( Ware Handler) in the Machine Shop Department of the 1st Party's Taloja Plant , Raigad District . He contends that , he was issued charge sheet dated 2-9-1999 for alleged misconduct of habitual absence without leave for 252 days during the period from 20-2-1990 to 7-7-1999 . He states that, he explained the absenteeism by letter dated 20-10-1999 and denied the charge . He contends that after he gave said explanation Enquiry Officer was appointed to conduct an enquiry who conducted enquiry and held him guilty of the charge leveled against him . He contends that , due to his sickness he was unable to report on duty between 22-2-1998 to 7-7-1999 . He contends that , whenever he fell sick and remained absent he submitted medical certificate with leave applications .He contends that , he submitted the said leave applications and medical certificates but it was not considered by the Management and he was unnecessarily shown as absent without permission . He contends that , as soon as he informed the Management about his absenteeism and reason behind it, inspite of that , he was charge sheeted and enquiry was conducted . He contends that, the enquiry conducted was not fair and proper and full opportunity was not given to him . He contends that , he was not permitted to defend himself in the enquiry . He contends that, Enquiry Officer was bias . He contends that , the finding of the Enquiry officer was perverse . He contends that , during the enquiry also he submitted copies of leave applications with Medical Certificates which he had submitted in the office to the Enquiry Officer still they were not considered by the Enquiry Officer . He submits that, the finding given by the Enquiry Officer is perverse and require quash and set aside holding enquiry unfair and improper . He also pray that , the action taken by the Management on the basis of said finding quash and set aside with directions to the Management to reinstate him with back wages and continuity of service .

: S/Shri George Kurian , K.S. Benson , Ms. Gita Raut and Ms. Theresa Benson , Advocates .

Forthe Workman : Shri M.B. Anchan , Advocate .

Dateof reserving the Award : 8-4-2009 .

Dateof passing the Award : 8-7-2009 .

AWARD - PART - 1

The matrix of the facts as culled out from the proceedings are as under :

3. This is disputed by the Management by filing reply at Exhibit 8 stating and contending that , 2nd Party was absent without permission and leave applications . It contends that , proper procedure was followed for conducting enquiry. It is contended that, charge sheet was issued and full opportunity was given to the concerned workman to represent him in the enquiry. It is contended that , principles of natural justice were followed while conducting enquiry against the concerned 1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L -42012 / 268 /2003 - IR( CM - 11 ) dated 19th

3056Gl/09-12 5154

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009/BHADRA 14, 1931

workman . It is contended that , the 2nd Party admitted his absenteeism for 252 days without leave or permission during the periodfrom 20-2-1998 to 7-7-1999 . It is contended that , such absence from duty without permission and without sanction is nothing but misconduct which is proved against him by holding enquiry. Even the Enquiry Officer gave finding to that effect and relying on that , Ist Party decided to terminate the services of the concerned workman . It is contended that, copy of the finding of the Enquiry Officer was sent to the 2nd Party for comments . It contended that, the same was challenged by the concerned workman before the Appellate Authority. It is contended that , the said appeal was turned down by the Appellate Authority maintaining the order of dismissal . It is contended that , the 2nd Party admit the charges and has not disputed it by leading cogent and sufficient evidence . It is denied that , he submitted medical certificate with application as and when he was absent and sick. It is contended that , the medical certificate were not proved before the Enquiry Officer by callingthe Doctor, the signatory ofthe medical certificate. It iscontended that , the 2nd Party is habitual in remaining absent without prior permission and intimation . It is contended that , the enquiry was conducted in Hindi language and written in Marathi of which copy was given tothe concerned workman . It is contended that , 2nd Party participated in the enquiry .It is contended that , full opportunity was given to the concerned workman while conducting enquiry. It is contended that , witnesses were offered for cross to the concerned workman and their cross was taken by the concerned workman . It is contended that , enquiry was conductedby following principles of natural justice and the enquiry was fair and proper . It is contended that, the Enquiry officer gave the finding on thebasis of the evidence available before him and it need not be interference and the Reference be rejected.

4. In view ofthe above pleadings Issues were framed atExhibit 14. Out of them issue of fairness of enquiry and perversity are tried as preliminary issues which I answer against them as follows:

ISSUES

FINDINGS

Yes I. Whether inquiry fair and proper?

No 2. Whether findings perverse ?.

REASONS :

ISSUES NOS . 1 & 2 :

(5) It is case of the 2nd Party that he was working with 1st Party as unskilled - I (Ware Handler) in the Machine Shop Department of the Plant of the Ist Party at Taloja, District Raigad. He alleges that, he was served with charge sheet dated 20-9-1999 levelling charge of misconduct of habitual absenteeism without leave for 252 days during theperiod 20-2-1998 to 7-7-1999. He alleges that, he replied said charge sheet and denied the allegations . He alleges

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] that, enquiry conducted on the same charges was not fair and proper . He alleges that, Enquiry Officer was bias . He alleges that , Management has not accepted his medical certificate produced by him with the application and regularize his absence on medical grounds . He alleges that , even medical certificates were not considered by the Enquiry officer. He alleges that, Enquiry Officer was bias . He alleges that , enquiry was conducted in English language , the language which he do not know . He alleges that, it was not explained. He alleges that, he was not given proper opportunity to participate in the enquiry .

(6) Said is disputed by the Management saying that, enquiry was fair and proper and full opportunity was given to the concerned workman . It is alleged that , he participated in the enquiry through his representative . It is alleged that , the concerned workman appeared in the enquiry and took part in it. It is alleged that , full opportunity was given to the concerned workman. It is alleged that , the decision was taken by Disciplinary Authority on the basis of the finding given by the Enquiry Officer onthe basis of the evidence before him . It is alleged that , the workman did not submit the medical certificate to the Management during the period of his absence . He produced those only before the Enquiry Officer but did not prove it by calling the Doctor the signatory to the Medical Certificates . It is the case of the Management that , the concerned workmen admit the absenteeism and unable to justify as to why he was absent for such a long period for 252 days during the period 20-2-1998 to 7-7-1999 . It is contended that, the Enquiry Officer had evidence to conclude that, the charge of habitual absenteeism without permission is proved against the concerned workman .

(7) To prove that , the concerned workman placed reliance on his affidavit filed at Exhibit 16 , in lieu of his examination - in- chief wherein he narrates the same story asstated above and make allegations as reproduced above. However, in the cross he admits that , he was served with charge sheet dated 20-9-1999 . He admits that , he replied the same on 20-9-1999 . He admits that , enquiry was conducted by leading evidence . He admits that , he participated in the enquiry . He admits that , he signed enquiry proceedings as and when it took place . He admits that, copy of the enquiry proceedings was served on him. He admits that when he was absent for 13 dates on the enquiry, that time, evidence was not recorded by the Enquiry officer . He admits that , he had appointed his representative i.e. Union leader . He admits that , he was not attending enquiry properly and remained absent. He admits that , enquiry was not conduced in his absence .He admits that , as and when he prayed for time it was granted bythe Enquiry Officer . He admits that , when he was absent evidence was not recorded by the Enquiry Officer . He admits that, enquiry was closed on 12-6-2001 and opened on 21-12-2001 at his request . , He admits that, he has not 5155 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/ भाद्र 14, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

filed written complaint about opportunity not given to him by the Enquiry Officer . He states that , one D. K. Patil was his Defence Representative who represented him in the enquiry . He admit that, he was President of the Union by name Kamgar Congress . He denies that , enquiry was conducted in Marathi and was translated in English in the enquiry proceedings . He admits that , he was served with the enquiry report . He admits that, from 1995 till 2002 his increment was stopped due to his irregular absenteeism and he was informed accordingly. On that , he closed evidence and filed closing purshis at Exhibit 18 .

concerned workman . It reveals that , the Management witnesses were cross examined by the 2nd Party's Defence Representative. Then evidence of concerned workman was recorded. Here it is to be noted that , the concerned workman claims that, he submitted the medical certificate and also he has produced before Enquiry Officer. It is pertinent to note that, on that point no question is put to him. Question No.6 put to the Management witness reveals that , medical certificate was not produced by the concerned workman before Management while applying for leave. Even charge sheeted employee who examined himself does not explain when he produced the medical certificates and to whom he gave those . Even he has not proved that medical certificates were given by him to the Management and those were not considered by it . Enquiry Officer in the finding referred to the medical certificate produced by the concerned workman saying that , those were not proved so he did not consider those .

(11) Here charge of absenteeism without permission is levelled against the concerned workman. Charge of habitual absenteeism was also levelled against the concerned workman . Concerned workman alleges that , he intimated about his absenteeism with medical certificates . However , that is not proved by him. Besides , he is not denying that , he was absent as alleged by the Management. If we consider all this coupled with the charge of absenteeism levelled against the concerned workmanof 250 days during the period from 22-2-1998 to 7-7-1999 one has to conclude that, definitely it is abnormal absenteeism and it reveals that , almost for all those days during the above period he was absent. When he alleges that , he was sick , question arises how he can pull on with his needs when he was absent for 252 days in a year out of 365 days . Besides , he admits that , he was absent . When he admit that , he was absent and even evidence produced onrecord reveals that , he participated in the enquiry which definitely prove that , he got full opportunity to appear in the enquiry and make out his case . It also reveals that , the concerned workman admit the guilt. Thus it reveals that , the charge of absenteeism is proved against the concerned workman.

(8) Against that , Ist Party examined Fanindara Kumar Gupta by filing his affidavit at Exhibit 19 who states that , he conducted the enquiry against the concerned workman . He contends that , charge of unauthorized absenteeism of 252 days was levelled against the concerned workman . He states that , the 2nd Party and his representative attended enquiry and on 12 dates it was not attended by 2nd Party so it was adjourned. He states that, on 9 occasions 2nd Party prayed for adjournments which were granted to him. He states that, the concerned workman with his representative signed the proceedings as and when they were present and as and when some proceedings took place in the enquiry . He states that , Management witness D.C. Vishwasraoi was examined and offered for cross to the 2nd Party and his defence representative. He states that , Defence Representative took cross of the Management witness . He stated that , enquiry proceedings were properly recorded. He states that, he has submitted report after recording evidence . He contends that , there was evidence to observe concerned workman guilty of the charge of absenteeism . In the cross he states that , the concerned workman applied for leave without pay from 23-9-1998 to 2-2-1999 and said request was rejected by the Management . He admits that , the concerned workman filed 4 medical certificates which cover his absenteeism of 240 days out of 252 days . He admits that, leave record was not produced by the Management in the enquiry . He states that , the enquiry was conducted in Hindi and Marathi but recorded in English . He admits that, he has not mentioned it in the enquiry proceedings . Onthat 1st Party closed evidence and filed closing purshis atExhibit20.

(9) Written arguments are filed by the concerned workman at Exhibit 21 which are replied by the 1st Party at Exhibit 22 with some citations .

(12) As far as fairness of enquiry and perversity of the finding is concerned, it is not pointed out by the concerned workman how enquiry is not fair and proper and finding is perverse . In fact burden is on the concerned workman to show that, how enquiry is fair and proper and finding contrary evidence brought on perverse . On the record and deposition given by him before this Tribunal does not permit us to say that, enquiry was not fair and proper and finding perverse. On the contrary evidence brought on record reveals that , enquiry was fair and proper and finding not perverse .

13. It was open to the 2nd Party to prove and justify the absenteeism but he has not utilised the said facility when it was available to him to bring evidence on record (10) Gone through the written arguments submitted by both and the enquiry proceedings submitted at Exhibit 13 pages 1 to 85. Here explanation given by the concerned workman is at page 3 of Exhibit 13 regarding his absenteeism , where he denied his unauthorised absenteeism. Then proceedings reveal that witnesses were examined by the Management and were offered for cross . It reveals that , proper opportunity was given to the 5156

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009/BHADRA 14 , 1931

and prove it before this Tribunal . Even he did not call the Doctor who gave alleged certificates to justify his absenteeism . That opportunity of calling Doctor was not utilised by the concerned workman. Besides he has not proved that , he gave medical certificates to the Management .It is fact that, he has given medical certificates to the Enquiry officer but author of that, who gave those is not examined and those certificates are not proved by examining the Doctor before the Enquiry Officer . Even same mistake is done by him by not calling Doctor before this Tribunal to prove the Medical Certificates and to justify his absenteeism .

14. If we consider all this coupled with the evidence brought on record I conclude that, enquiry is fair and proper and finding not perverse . So I answer above Issues to that effect and passes the order as under :

ORDER

(a) I observe enquiry is fair , proper and finding not perverse ,

(b) 1 direct both to participate on the quantum of punishment.

Bombay,

A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer 8thJuly, 2009

नई दिल्ली , 12 अगस्त , 2009

का.आ. 2445.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं बी.बी.एम. बी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, नं -1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 97/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [ सं. एल-23012/ 21/2000- आई आर ( सी -11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 12th August , 2009

S.O. 2445. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.97/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BBMB , and their workman , which was received by the Central Govemment on 12-8-2009 .

[ No. L -23012/21 /2000-1R(C - 11 )] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANDENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 ,

CHANDIGARH

Case No. 1. D. No.97/2001

Shri Kuldeep Singh C / o Shri R.K. Singh Parmar , 211 - L, Brari P.O. Partap Nagar, Nangal Dam , District Ropar .

...Applicant

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)]

Versus

The Chief Engineer , Bhakra Dam , BBMB Nangal Township, District Ropar .

...Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the Workman

Shri R. K. Singh , AR.

For the Management

Shri Bhagat Singh and Shri S. K. Goel , ARs .

AWARD

Passed on 3-8-2009

Government of India , vide Notification No. L -23012/ 21/2000- IR( C- 11 ) , Dated 08-03-2001 , by exercising its pow- ers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, (here- inafter referred to as the Act ) , referred the following refer- ence forjudicial adjudication to this Tribunal:

"Whether the action of the management ofBBMB in terminating the services of Shri Kuldeep Singh S / o Shri Batna Ram is legal & justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

It is the contention of the workman that he was engaged in Nangal Workshop Division as unskilled Mazdoor token No. 422 -D on daily wages and he was em- ployed continuously till 31-03-1993 . His services were ille- gally terminated by the management . Juniors to him were retained in service , whereas his services were terminated against the provisions of the Act . It is further contended by the workman that at the time of his retrenchment more than 600 workers were working in the department and his services were retrenched without taking permission from appropriate Authority. No notice , one month wages in lieu of notice or retrenchment compensation was paid to him before his retrenchment , which made his termination illegal being against the provisions of Section 25G and 25H of the Act.

Themanagement of the BBMB opposed the claim of the workman by filing the written statement . It is the con- tention of the management that seniority list was strictly maintained by the department in compliance of the direc- tions given by the Hon ' ble Himachal Pradesh High Court in CWP 27 of 1988 , Ram Piari Versus BBMB. No junior to theworkman was retained in service and the workman was given one month notice and retrenchment compensation as per the law.

Opportunity of adducing evidence was given to the parties . Affidavits were filed, which were considered as chief examination and cross - examination was recorded in open court on oath , Certaindocuments relied by the par- ties were also filed . Arguments were heard .

I have gone through the evidence adduced by the parties, oral and documentary.

The first contention of the workman is that there were more than 600 workers in the department and no per- 5157 भारत का राजपत्र सितम्बर 5, 2009/भाद्र 14 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BBMB, and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 12-8-2009.

[No. L-22012/ 156/ 1995-1R(C- 11 ) ]

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA,

PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH.

Case No. I.D. No.11/ 1996

The President, Nangal Bhakra Mazdoor Sangh , Quarter No.35 - G , Nangal Township , District Ropar . ( Punjab) -140 124

..Applicant

Versus

The ChiefEngineer , Bhakra Dam, BBMB Nangal Township, District Ropar .

.Respondent mission of appropriate Authority was taken before termi- nation ofthe services of the workman , which is violation of Section 25N ofthe Act . The workman has also relied on a judgment published in 1990 ( 78 ) FJR 412. I have also gone through the judgment relied upon and cited by the work- man . It is admitted case of the parties that the applicant was working in this unit on daily wage basis and not as a permanent employee . He was employed for the specific job when the work against which he was deployed came to an end his services were retrenched by giving one month notice and paying retrenchment compensation .It is admitted by the workman in his cross - examination that he waspaid Rs . 2508 as terminal dues and he received the same on 31-03-1993 . Thus , the authority cited and relied upon by the workman , is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of case in question. The workman was a dailywager and his services were retrenched after comply- ing with the provisions of Section 25F of the Act . There- fore, in my view , the management was not under any obli- gation for taking permission of the appropriate authority before retrenching the services of the workman .

APPEARANCES

Shri R.K. Singh , AR .

Forthe Workman

Shri Bhagat Singh and

Forthe Management:

Shri S. K. Goel , ARs .

AWARD

Passed on 3-8-2009

Government of India , vide Notification No. L-22012 / 156/95 - IR (C - II ) dated 12-1-1996 by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act ), referred the following reference for judicial adjudication of this Tribunal :--

By cogent evidence the management has proved that seniority of daily wage workers was maintained by the management of the BBMB in compliance ofthe directions given by the Hon ' ble Himachal Pradesh High Court in Ram Piari ' s case ( supra) . There is no iota of evidence adduced/filed by the workman to prove that any junior to the workman was retained in service at the time, the ser- vices of the workman were retrenched . The workman has also failed to prove that new hands or junior to him were provided with the job after the termination of his services . Thus, on the basis of above discussion , I am of the view thatthe services of the workman were terminated in a law- ful manner and the workman is not entitled for any relief. Let the Central Government be approached for publication ofaward , and thereafter , the file be consigned to the record room.

"Whether the category of Wireman and Linemen in the Estt. of BBMB are doing the same and similar type of work and are entitled for same scales of pay ? Ifnot to what other reliefthese categories are entitled ? "

G.K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 12 अगस्त, 2009

Onthe plan reading of the reference it is evident that the controversybetween the management and the workman iswhether the Wiremen and Linemen posted and working with the management of BBMB are doing the job of similar nature and whether they are entitled to the same Pay Scales?

का.आ. 2446.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.बी.एम.बी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नं. - 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 11/1996 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/156/ 1995 - आई आर ( सी-11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 12th August , 2009

It is the contention of the workmen that upto 30-12-1995 Linemen and Wiremen were doing the similar job and also getting the same and similar Pay Scales . It was on 1-1-1996, when BBMB adopted the Pay Scales of Punjab State Electricity Board that Pay Scales of two categories , namely Wiremen and Linemen were on different footings . As the nature of work of Lineman and Wireman is the same, they are entitled for the same pay structure and any difference in Pay Scales is arbitrary .

The management filed the written statement and adduced the contention of the Government . It is the contention ofthe management that required qualifications S.O. 2446. ln pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.11 / 1996) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour 5158

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009/ BHADRA 14, 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ] forthe recruitment of Wiremen and Linemen are different , their recruitment process is different and the nature of the job is also different . It is further contended by the management that the management has rightly kept these two categories under the different Pay Scales .

Properopportunity for adducing the evidence was givento the parties . Parties adduced the oral evidence and also filed documentary evidence . After hearing the arguments of the parties , the file was reserved for orders .

on the basis of their working with Electricity Department , their duties cannot be said to be similar and same . Even in Electricity Department , there are certain types of workmen discharge different duties . On the basis of oral and documentary evidence , I am of the view that the natures of work of both of the categories of workmen are different. Wireman has to work to ALT Circuits , whereas , the Lineman isdeputed on the job ofHT and Light Voltage Transmission linesand other allied jobs . The jobs of lineman impose lot of risk as they have to climb to electric polls and many oftimes worked in light wire circuit.

Witness ofmanagement has categorically stated that desired qualifications for recruitment of these two categories of workmen are different . There is no specific denial on it . Certain document also reveals that these two categories of workmen are recruited as per the different procedure and are discharging the different functions . Thus, there is no illegality in keeping the two categories of workmen in different pay structure .

There is no dispute on the issue that before 1-1-1986 , Linemen and Wiremen were getting the same Pay Scales under the different nomenclature . On 1-1-1986, the management of the BBMB adopted the Pay Scales ofPunjab State Electricity Board by an administrative scheme.There was no post of Lineman in Punjab State Electricity Board, the same was given the pay structure as per letter No. 7879-8080/R & R/ 130/96/RO dated 25-2-1999 with effect from 1-1-1996. The letter ofthe Special Secretary of the Board of the BBMB along with scheme of fixation of pay is on the record. In this letter for Linemen and Wiremen different pay scales are mentioned .

During arguments the workmen argued that it is the violation of right to equality because both of the categories are doing the same and similar job but they are paid differently. On the other hand it was argued on behalf of the BBMB that fixation of pay is the prerogative of the management and it cannot be challenged before this Tribunal . It was further argued that service conditions , nature of job and eligible qualifications in both of the positions are different and there is no illegality in keeping them in different pay structure .

Oneofthe contentions ofthe workman , as it is clear from the evidence of WW- 1 and WW- 2 , is that sometime theworkman had also worked as Lineman . It is the different issue altogether. If a particular workman , working in particular category of a department , is entrusted to discharge the different functions , in that case , that workman is entitled for the wages of the work he has discharged, irrespective ofthe fact , in which category he was recruited by the department . Because of the fact that Wireman sometimes had worked and discharged the duties of Lineman , it cannot be said that it protect the entire cadre of Wireman for getting the similar Pay Scales of the Lineman . If Shri Vijay Kumar and Shri Anil Kumar had worked as Linemen under the instructions of the management for sometime, they are at liberty to claim the wages for that particular period but for their temporarily discharging and functioning as the Lineman , the entire cadre of Wireman cannot be given or sanctioned the pay structure of Lineman .

Moreover , Hon'ble Apex Court in Union of India and Others Vs. Indu Lal and others 2002 (3 )-All India Services Law Journal- 130, has held that fixation of pay is not the function of the courts . Hon'ble Supreme Court in this case has also held that equation of pay or post is not a cause to decide by Court . It is an administration function.

Itthere are two classes of employees doing the same job , having t same nature of work to perform and there is nodifference in discharging of their duties , certainly they are entitled for equal pay. But if nature of work performed and duties discharged are different , it is open for the management to keep them under the different pay structure . Right to equality as protected under Article 14 of the Constitution also permits the reasonable qualifications among the employees performing different functions and discharging different duties . There cannot be any discrimination in a class of employees doing the same and similar job and discharging the similar duties . But if the dutiesdischarged by the employees are different , it gives a cause to the management to differentiate their Pay Scales on the basis of the work done and duties discharged .

TheCourt's interference is only possible when there is gross injustice in fixation of pay and post. For it the forum for raising such a dispute is also different .

Onthe basis of the above discussion , I am of the view that two categories of workers i.e. Wireman and Lineman are not entitled to similar pay because they are forming on the basis of their duties carried on and functions discharged altogether a different cadre . The reference is , accordingly , answered . Let the Central Government be approached for publication of award , and thereafter , the file be consigned to the record room .

The oral evidence adduced by two workmen namely; Vijay Kumar as WW - I and Ajay Kumar as WW-2 shows that they have sometimes discharged the duties of Lineman also WW- 2 , in his evidence has admitted that the functions ofboth of the categories of workmen namely ; Wireman and Lineman are different . The parameter of risk in the duties of Lineman is much more than the Wireman . Nature of their work is also different . In my view, both of the categories of workmen are working in the Electricity Department and just

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer 5159 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/भाद्र 14 , 1931

APPEARANCE

नई दिल्ली , 13 अगस्त, 2009

For the Petitioner Union Sri S. Vaidyanathan

For the 1st Management : M/ s . S. Jayaraman

2ndManagement

: M/ s . S. Sadugopan

AWARD

का. आ. 2447.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार नेलाई ट्रान्सपोर्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 34/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-09 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

The Central Government, Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L - 29011 / 74 /2005-1R ( M ) dated 31-05-2006 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .

The schedule mentioned in that order is :

[सं. एल-29011/74/2005- आई.आर. (एम. ) ] कमल बाखरू, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th August , 2009

'Whether the termination of Sri S. Kumarandi by the management of Nellai Transports as claimed by the India Cement Employees Union , is legal and justified? If so, to what relief the workman is entitled?"

2. After the receipt of Industrial Dispute, this Tribunal has numbered it as 34/2006 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their respective counsel and petitioner filed Claim Statement. The Respondent did not file any Counter Statement .

S.O. 2447. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 34/ 2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Nellai Transports and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 12-8-09.

3. The averments in the Claim Statement in a nutshell are briefly as follows:

[No. L -29011/ 74/2005 - IR ( M) ] KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT CHENNAI

Friday, the 31st July, 2009

The workman joined service under the Second Respondent Contractor on 19-02-1990 to discharge the work of First Respondent , the principal employer . Consequent on termination of the workman the Industrial Dispute arose which on failure of conciliation was referred to this Tribunal . Termination ofthe workman is illegal and contrary to ID Act provisions . It is not complying with Section- 25F of the ID Act and amounts to unfair labour practice, colourable exercise of powers and victimization . Hence the prayer for reinstatement with attendant benefits .

Present : Shri A.N.Janardanan , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 34/2006

(Inthe matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofsub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2(A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between theManagement of Nellai Transports and their Workman)

BETWEEN

4. The matter was stayed by the High Court of Madras under Order dated 03-08-2006 in Writ Petition No. 24598/2006 and the matter continued to be stayed for long . While so , a memo was filed by the parties reporting settle- ment out of Court . The case also stood not represented by either side continuously . The learned counsel for the petitioner also endorsed that the matter has been settled and appropriate orders be passed vide endorsement on the Claim Statement .

5. Points for consideration are:

The General Secretary, India Cements Employees Union , 298 / D Thalaiyuthu Sankar Nagar Tirunelveli - 627357

1stParty/ Petitioner Union

(i) Whether the termination of the workman is legal and justified ?

Vs.

( ii) To what relief the workmen is entitled ?

Points 1 & 2

1. The general Manager India Cements Ltd.

SankarNagar Tirunelveli - 627357

1stRespondent/ II Party

2. M.S. Nellai Transport 363/2 , Quarry Road SankarNagar Tirunelveli -627357

6. This is case reported settled out of Court as endorsed by the learned counsel for the petitioner in writing on the Claim Statement. Both parties also reported as above . The continuation of the proceedings after the filing of the Claim Statement stood stayed by the High court of Madras in Writ Petition No. 24598/2006 . The 2nd Respondent/ 11 Party 5160

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009 /BHADRA 14, 1931

Respondents never opted to contest the Industrial Dis- pute by filing any Counter Statement . Eventually, the dis- pute has been reported settled out of Court . The dispute has not actually arisen before this forum for a real adjudi- cation . No issues at which parties were at variance were settled and no decision was actually called for .

7. From the reference, it is seen that there was termination of S. Kumarandi by the Management ofNellai Transports as claimed by the India Cements Union . The question referred is whether such a termination is legal and justified? Since no material has been placed to sub- stantiate that point by the Claimant who challenges it , it is not possible to enter a finding that such termination is not legal and justified. Hence what follows is that the termina- tion is legal and justified . So found .

8. The reference is answered as above .

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , cor- rected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 31st July, 2009)

A. N. JANARDANAN . Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined :

None

For the 1 Party /Petitioner

None

For the II Party /Management

Documents Marked :

From the Petitioner's side

Date

Ex. No.

Description

Nil

From the Management side :

Ex.No.

Date

Description

Nil नई दिल्ली , 13 अगस्त, 2009

का. आ. 2448, - औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं डब्ल्यू. सी. एल . के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 61/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22012 /298/2003- आई. आर. ( सीएम -11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th August, 2009

S.O. 2448. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 61/2004 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Nagpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Western Coalfields Limited and their

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ] workman,which was received by the Central Government on 13-8-2009 .

[No. L - 22012/ 298 / 2003 - IR ( CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI A. N. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM - LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR Case No. CGIT/ NGP/ 61 /2004 Date : 31-7-2009 Petitioner/ Shri Bhanudas Rebbawar ,

Party No. 1 : Secretary , Lal Zanda Coal Mines Mazdoor Union ( CITU ) , Subhash Nagar Ward, Ballarpur, Post & Tah . Ballarpur , Chandrapur (onbehalf of Shri Sheikh Habib S / o Sheikh Ibrahim)

Versus

The Sub -Area Manager ,

Respondent/ :

Party No. 2 : Ballarpur Sub - Area of Western Coalfield Limited, Post & Tah . Ballarpur , Dist. Chandrapur (M.S. ) AWARD

(Dated: 31st July, 2009)

1. The Central Government after satisfying the existence of dispute between Shri Bhanudas Rebbawar , Secretary , Lal Zanda Coal Mines Mazdoor Union ( CITU), Chandrapur ( on behalf of Shri Sheikh Habib S /o Sheikh Ibrahim ) ( Party No. 1 ) and the Sub -Area Manager , Ballarpur Sub- Area of Western Coalfields Limited, Chandrapur (Party No. 2) referred the same for adjudication to this Tribunal vide its letter No. L - 22012/ 298 / 2003 / 1R (CM - II ) dated 23-6-2004 under clause (d) of sub -section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) with the following Schedule.

{ 2. " Whether the action of the management of Ballarpur Sub - Area of Western Coalfields Limited in removing from services Sh . Sheikh Habib S/ o Sh . Sheikh Ibrahim, General Mazdoor , Ballarpur Colliery 3 & 4 pits vide office order No. WCL/ BA /Ballarpur U / G/H - 22/ 1711 , dated 24-11-2002 is legal and justified? If not , to what relief to which the workman is entitled ? "

3. The Secretary , Lal Zanda Coal Mines Mazdoor Union ( CITU ) Union has raised the dispute of Sh . Sheikh Habib S / o Sh . Sheikh Ibrahim , before the ALC thatthe Petitioner was working as a General Mazdoor in Ballarpur Colliery 3 &4 pits and on failing of conciliation proceeding , the Government has referred it to the CGIT . During the pendency of the dispute i.e. reference No. 61 / 2004 on 9-7-2009 both the parties settled it amicably outside the Court . They arrived at following certain conditions: Terms and Conditions :

1. Shri Sheikh Habib will be re - employed afresh as General Mazdoor in Cat - 1 for underground mine and he will be paid initial basic of Cat . 1 ( UG ) in Baliarpur Area .

5161 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/ भाद्र 14, 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

ANNEXURE

2. Such re -employment will be subject to medical fitness so certified by the Company Doctor.

BEFORE SHRI A. N. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR

Date: 27-7-2009

Case No. CGIT/NGP/87/2006

Petitioner / Shri Lomesh Khartad, General

Party No. 1 :

3. Shri Sheikh Habib shall remain on probation for a period of one year from the date of joining and he has to put in minimum 190 days of attendance in a year . In case his attendance and general performance is not found satisfactory by the management , his services shall automatically stand terminated without any enquiry or assigning any reason thereof.

Secretary , Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Congress , Dr. Ambedkar Ward, Br , Ballarpur , Chandrapur (on behalf of Shri Kande Bhurma Pocham)

The Sub-Area Manager ,

4. Shri Sheikh Habib has been paid gratuity, hence he will not be entitled to benefit of continuity of service .

Respondent/ PartyNo. 2: Sasti Colliery of WCL , PO Sasti , Tah . Rajura, Dist . Chandrapur (M.S. ) AWARD

5. The period from the date of his terminationtill re- employment and joining on his duty will be treated as dies-non on the principle of no work no pay.

(Dated: 27th July, 2009)

6. Form-H settlement individually or through union , incorporating the above terms and conditions for entering into employment and the same will be sent for registration to the Labour machinery.

7. Industrial Dispute is pending before the CGIT the re-employed person will withdraw the same from CGITby filing a copy of settlement for consent award.

stage. 8. He shall have no right to apply for VRS at later

1. The Central Government after satisfying the existence ofdispute between Shri Lomesh Khartad,General Secretary, Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Congress , Chandrapur (on behalf of Shri Kande Bhuma Pocham) (PartyNo. 1) and the Sub-Area Manager, Sasti Colliery of WCL, Dist . Chandrapur (M.S. ) (Party No. 2) referredthe same for adjudication to this Tribunal vide its letter No. L-22012/87/2006/IR ( CM - II ) dated 01-11-2006 under clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) with the following schedule.

They agreed itbefore the Court by filing the pursis and requested for the Award in that terms . 1 accepted it and recorded the compromise Award in the terms of it . Consequently, there remained no dispute due to the com- promise. Hence, this no dispute Award.

date: 31-07-2009.

2."Whether the action ofthe management in relation to Sasti Colliery of Western Coalfields Limited in terminating the services of Shri Kande Bhuma Pocham w.e.f. 8-8-2002 is legal and justified? Ifnot, to what relief is the workman entitled ?"

A. N. YADAV, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 13 अगस्त, 2009

3. The General Secretary, Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Congress ( RCMC) Union has raised the dispute ofMr. Kanda Bhuma Pocham before the ALC and on failing ofthe conciliatión proceeding, the Government had referred itto this CGIT- cum- Labour Court . During the pendency ofthe dispute i.e. reference No. 87/2006 on 27-7-2009 both the parties settled it amicably outside the Court. They arrived at following certain conditions :

का. आ. 2449.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार डब्ल्यू. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 87/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-8-09 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Terms and Conditions:

[सं. एल-22012/87/2006- आई.आर. ( सी.एम-11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th August, 2009

1. Shri Kande Bhuma Pocham willbe re - employed afresh as General Mazdoor in Cat- 1 for underground mine and he will be paid initial basis of Cat . 1 ( UG ) in Ballarpur Area.

2. Such re-employment will be subject to medical fitness so certified by the Company Doctor.

S.O. 2449. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 87/ 2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Nagpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Sasti Colliery ofWCL, and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 13-8-09.

[No. L- 22012/87/2006- IR (CM - II )]

3. Shri Kande Bhuma Pocham shall remain on probation for a period of one year from the date ofjoining and he has to put in minimum 190 days of attendance in a year. In case his attendance and general performance is not found satisfactory by the management , his services shall automatically stand terminated without any enquiry or assigning any reason thereof.

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, DeskOfficer

3056 G1/09-13 5162

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009/BHADRA 14, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

4. Shri Kande Bhuma Pocham had received his entitled gratuity for the service , he had rendered for the period 13-10-1984 to 8-8-2002 in the company. As such continuity of service will not be provided of the purpose ofgratuity.

Misc. Case No. 1 of2007 (Ref. 33/03)

Present : Sri Manoranjan Pattnaik, Presiding Officer 5. The period from the date of his termination till re-employment and joining on his duty will be treated as dies-non on the principle of no work no pay.

Parties : Industrial Dispute between the management ofKhas Kajora Colliery Vrs . Theirworkmen

6. Form -H'settlement individually or through union, incorporating the above terms and conditions for entering, into employment and the same will be sent for registration to the Labour machinery.

REPRESENTATIVES

Forthe Applicant

: Sri P.K. Das , Advocate

INDUSTRY : COAL

For the Opposite Party : None STATE: WEST BENGAL 7. In case any dispute is pending before the CGIT the re- employed person should withdraw the same from CGIT by filing a copy of Settlement for consent award. If any matter is pending before any other courts , the union/ ex-employee will withdraw the case from the concerned court.

Dated the 10-6-2009

ORDER

stage. 8. He shall have no right to apply for VRS at later

They agreed it before the Court by filing the purshis and requested for the Award in that terms . I accepted it and recorded the compromise Award in the terms of it. Consequently , there remained no dispute due to the compromise. Hence , this no dispute Award .

Date:27-7-2009.

A. N. YADAV, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 13 अगस्त, 2009

This order is on the application filed by the petitioner and registered on 2-12-2007 for restoration of the reference No. 33/03 to file . The Union inter alia contends that to non availability of the workman in the event of his retirement written statement could not be filed and consequently the reference was disposed of with a 'No Dispute Award' . The Union now in this application urged for restoration of the case on the plea that it is ready to file written statement . The management too has not filed written statement in the proceeding.

का. आ. 2450.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं ई.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय असनसोल के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 01/2007) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22013/ 1/2009-आई.आर. (सी- II )] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th August, 2009

Onpersual it is found that an award has been passed on 15-8-2006 and same has been notified on Gazette of India on 7-8-2006 . The union has not taken any steps in the reference proceeding from 16-2-2005 to 15-6-2006 .Also it has approached now with restoration of the lapse of about 6 months and in a half hearted and casual manner and finally did not turn up at the time of hearing . At any rate after the award has been passed and notified this Tribunal has became functus officio for absence of any legal provision under the I.D. Act , 1947 or Rules that for setting aside it award . In the result the Misc . Application has no merit and is liable to be dismissed . Hence ordered,

ORDERED

The Misc . application is dismissed.

MANORANJAN PATINAIK, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 13 अगस्त , 2009

S.O. 2450.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 01 / 2007 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Asansol as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ECL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 13-8-2009 .

[No. L-22013 / 1/2009 - IR (C - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer

का. आ. 2451.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैंगनीज ओर इंडिया लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बींच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5, 2009/ भाद्र 14, 1931

सीजीआईटी/एलसी/आर/228 /99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-27012/ 1/99- आई.आर. ( एम)] कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th August, 2009

S.O. 2451. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.CGIT/ LC/R/228 / 99 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Manganese Ore India Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 12-8-2009 .

[No. L -27012/1/99 - IR ( M) ] KAMAL BAKHRU, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC /R/228/99 Presiding Officer : Shri Mohd . Shakir Hasan The General Secretary,

5163 was appointed as underground un - skilled piece rated worker w.e.f. 13-7-97 in place of her mother Smt . Mukdi Kunele Shende , who obtained VRS w.e.f. 12-7-09 . He was appionted with terms and conditions in addition to standing orders . The workman accepted the terms and conditions before his joining . The applicant submitted a declaration before joining his duty. The management forwarded his declaration to the concerned police for verification who after verification , reported to the management that the workman was held guilty by the Competent Court in Criminal Case No. 584/92 and was fined for Rs . 200/- and in default of payment of fine 10 days imprisonment was imposed on him . The workman gave an application and denied the allegation. It is stated that the management again asked for a report from the police who again reported that a criminal case is also pendingand he is also fined by the Competent Court. It is stated that the applicant had submitted a false declaration with regard to his character that he did not involve in any criminal case nor any criminal case is pending against him. On receipt of the report of the police authority, he has been terminated in terms of his appointment order .

4. Now the only point as to whether the action of the management in dismissing the workman from service islegal and justified?

...Workman/Union

Bhartiya Manganese Mazdoor Sangh , Chikla-Jode Sadak , Teh . Tumsar, Bhandara

Versus

The ChiefEngineer (Mines) , Manganese Ore ( India) Ltd. , Teh . Tumsar , Bhandara

...Management

AWARD

Passed on this 27th day of July, 2009 1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide itsNotificationNo. L- 27012/ 1 /99- IR(M) , dated 16-6-1999 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

"Whether the action of the management of Manganee Ore India Ltd. , Chikla Mine , in dismisssing Shri Prithviraj Kundlik Shende , ex-worker from service w.e.f. 6-1-1998 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the said workman is entitled and from what date?"

2. In this case the workman did not appear inspite ofnotice and therefore the predecessor's Court proceeded the case ex parte against the workman on 8-10-2007.

3. The case of the non-applicant/management in short is that the workman Shri Prithviraj Kundlik Shende 5. To prove the case , the management has examined oral anddocumentary evidence . The management witness Shri Nitin Pagnis is examined in the case . He is senior Manager ( Personnel ) . He has supported the case of the management . He has stated that the workman was appointed in place of his mother who obtained VRS . Her VRS was accepted by the management and the said letter ismarked as Exhibit M/ 1 . He has stated that the workman was issued appointment letter with terms and conditions and the some was accepted by the workman . The said appointment letter and his declaration is marked as Exhibit M/ 2 . He has stated that the workman submitted a declaration letter before joining his duty. The said letter markedas Exhibit M/3 . This clearly shows that he accepted thejob with terms and conditions that if after verification ofhis character, he was found involved in any criminal case, he would be terminated without notice and any compensation.He has further stated that the management forwarded his declaration to the police , from where the management received report that he was punished by the Competent Court. The said report is marked as Exhibit M/4. The workman again submitted an application regarding his innocence which is marked as ExhibitM/5 . Themanagement again sent it to the police which is Exhibit M/6 . He has further stated that the report of the police was received confirming his criminal antecedent. This itself shows that a false declaration was submitted by the workman who was appointed conditionally. This witness is not cross -examined . There is no other evidence to contradict the evidence of the management . There is no 5164

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5, 2009/BHADRA 14, 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

AWARD

reason to disbelieve these documentary as well as oral evidence. Accordingly it is answered in favour of the management .

6. In the result, the award is passed ex parte against the workman and in favour of the management.

Thisisa case taken under Section 2A (2) of the 1.D. Act, 1947 by the Labour Court , Hyderabad in view ofthe judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989dated 3-8-1995between Sri U. Channappa and M/ s . Cotten Corporation of India and two others .

7. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Goverment of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment as perrules.

MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN, PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली , 13 अगस्त, 2009

2. The Petitioner filed his claim statement stating that he was working as permanent Khalasi in Visakhapatnam Steel Plant and was removed from service on 8-12-2003 . It is submitted that he requested the management for reinstatement . He prayed to direct the Respondents for his reinstatement .

का. आ. 2452.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. आर. आई. एन.एल. ,विशाखापट्टनम स्टील प्लांट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 24/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

3. A counter was filed by the Respondents . It is submitted that the Petitioner was appointed on 19-1-1983 and terminated on 8-11-2003 . It is submitted that the workman was provided with reasonable opportunity and as the charges were admitted by the workman . Hence , the petition be dismissed .

4. Petitioner filed written arguments on 29-12-2006 .

[सं. एल-26025/1/2009- आई.आर. ( एम)] कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th August, 2009

5. After filing of wirtten arguments on 21-10-2008 it was informed to this court by the Respondent's counsel that Petitioner is dead , legal heirs being informed by Respondent.

6. On 21-4-2009, Respondent's counsel is present while Petitioner called absent. It has been already been informed that Petitioner of this case is dead . No Petition was moved for substitution as his legal heirs , as such, Nil Award is passed in non - prosecution of this case .

Award passed accordingly. Transmit .

S.O. 2452.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 24/ 2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ S . R.I.N.L. , Vishakhpatnam Steel Plant and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 12-8-2009.

[ No. L- 26025/ 1 /2009- IR (M ) ]

KAMAL BAKHRU, Presiding Officer

Dictated to Smt . Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant transcribed by her, corrected by me on this the 21st day ofApril , 2009 .

ANNEXURE

VED PRAKASH GAUR, Presiding Officer

Appendix ofevidence

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT AT HYDERABAD

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined Present: Shri Ved Prakash Gaur , Presiding Officer

Petitioner

for the Respondent Dated the 24th day of April , 2009

NIL

Industrial Dispute L.C. No.24/2006

BETWEEN

Documents marked for the Petitioner NIL

Sri S. Satyanarayana,

S/ o Nagabhushanam ,

R/o LIG 138 , Housing Board Colony,

Documents marked for the Respondent NIL

Pedagantyada,

नई दिल्ली , 3 सितम्बर , 2009

Visakhapatnam - 530044

...Respondents

APPEARANCES

For the Petioner

Sri R. V. S.Rao , Advocate

M/s . Y.V. Sanyasi Rao &

For the Respondent :

Y. Ramesh , Advocates

का. आ. 2453.- केन्द्रीय सरकार , कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधि नियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 34 ) की धारा 91- क के साथ पठित धारा 88 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए एत‌द्वारा अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट कारखानों/स्थापनाओं के नियमित कर्मचारियों को इस 5165

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 5 , 2009/ भाद्र 14, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

अधिनियम के प्रचालन से 30 सितम्बर , 2010 तक की अवधि के लिए छूट प्रदान करती है ।

2. उक्त छूट निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन है, अर्थात्:-

1. पूर्वोक्त स्थापना जिसमें कर्मचारी नियोजित हैं, एक रजिस्टर रखेगा, जिसमें छूट प्राप्त कर्मचारियों के नाम और पदनाम दिखाये जायेंगे;

(ख) ऐसे प्रधान या आसन्न नियोजक के अधिभोगाधीन , किसी कारखाने , स्थापना , कार्यालय या अन्य परिसर में किसी भी उचित समय पर प्रवेश करना और उसके प्रभारी से यह अपेक्षा करना कि वह व्यक्तियों के नियोजन और मजदूरी के संदाय से संबंधित ऐसे लेखा , बहियां और अन्य दस्तावेज ऐसे निरीक्षक या अन्य पदधारी के समक्ष प्रस्तुत करें और उनकी परीक्षा करने दें या ऐसी जानकारी देंजिसे वे आवश्यक समझते हैं; या

2. इस छूट के होते हुए भी , कर्मचारी उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन ऐसी प्रसुविधाएं प्राप्त करते रहेंगे जिनको पाने के लिए वे इस अधिसूचना द्वारा दी गई छूट के प्रवृत होने की तारीख से पूर्व संदत अंशदानों के आधार पर हकदार हो जाते हैं;

(ग ) प्रधान या आसन्न नियोजक की, उसके अभिकर्ता या सेवक की , या ऐसे किसी व्यक्ति को, जो ऐसे कारखाने , स्थापना, कार्यालय या अन्य परिसर में पाया जाए , यह विश्वास करने का युक्तियुक्त कारण है कि वह कर्मचारी है परीक्षा करना; या

3. छूट प्राप्त अवधि के लिए , यदि कोई अभिदाय पहले ही किए आ चुके हों , तो वे वापस नहीं किए जाएंगे ;

(घ ) ऐसे कारखाने , स्थापना , कार्यालय या अन्य परिसर में रखे गए किसी रजिस्टर , लेखा , बही या अन्य दस्तावेज की नकल तैयार करना या उद्धरण लेना;

(ङ) यथानिर्धारित अन्य शक्तियों का प्रयोग करना । 4. उक्त कारखाने/स्थापना का नियोजक उस अवधि की बाबत जिसके दौरान उस कारखाने/स्थापना पर उक्त अधिनियम (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात " उक्त अवधि कहा गया है" ) प्रवर्तमान था ऐसी विवरणियां , ऐसे प्रारूप में और ऐसी विशिष्टियों सहित देगा जो कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा ( साधारण ) विनियम , 1950 के अधीन उसे उक्त अवधि की बाबत देनी अपेक्षित होती थीं;

6. विनिवेश/निगमीकरण के मामले में , प्रदत्त छूट स्वतः रद्द हो जाएगी और तब नए प्रतिष्ठान को छूट हेतु समुचित सरकार की अनुमति लेनी होगी ।

अनुसूची

क्रम संख्या स्थापना कारखाने का नाम

1. सेमी कंडक्टर लेबोरेट्री, एस.ए.एस. नगर , पंजाब 5. निगम द्वारा उक्त कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम की धारा 45 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन नियुक्त किया गया कोई निरीक्षक या निगम का इस निमित प्राधिकृत कोई अन्य पदधारी;

2. इंडियन रेयर अर्थ लिमिटेड , उद्योग मंडल , केरल

3. चेन्नई पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, चेन्नई ( सभी इकाइयां)

(i ) धारा 44 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन , उक्त अवधि की बाबत दी गई किसी विवरण की विशिष्ट्यों को सत्यापित करने के प्रयोजनार्थ; अथवा

4. मैरीन वर्कशॉप ऑफ सैन्ट्रल इनलैण्ड वाटर ट्रांसपोर्ट कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , कोलकाता

भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड ( सभी इकाइयां )

(ii ) यह अभिनिश्चित करने के प्रयोजनार्थ कि कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा ( साधारण ) विनियम , 1950 द्वारा यथाअपेक्षित रजिस्टर और अभिलेख उक्त अवधि के लिए रखे गये थे या नहीं; या

हिन्दुस्तान न्यूज प्रिन्ट लिमिटेड , न्यूज प्रिन्ट नगर डाकघर कोट्टायम, केरल

7. तूतीकोरिन पोर्ट ट्रस्ट, तूतीकोरिन

इंस्ट्रूमेंटेशन लिमिटेड, कोटा

9. कोचीन शिपयार्ड लिमिटेड , कोचीन

(iii ) यह अभिनिश्चित करने के प्रयोजनार्थ कि कर्मचारी , नियोजक द्वारा दिये गए उन फायदों को , जिसके फलस्वरूप इस अधिसूचना के अधीन छूट दी जा रही है, नकद. में और वस्तु रूप में पाने का हकदार बना हुआ है या नहीं; या

10. राष्ट्रीय बीज निगम ( केन्द्रीय भंडार एवं आपूर्ति प्रभाग , नई दिल्ली तथा इसकी वे इकाइँयाः गुंटूर , नांडयाल , सिकन्दराबाद , बंगलौर , आलंधर, भटिंडा , कुर्नूल )

11. आई टी आई लिमिटेड , पल्लाकड़

12. हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड ( सभी इकायां ( iv ) यह अभिनिश्चित करने के प्रयोजनार्थ कि उस अवधि के दौरान ,जब उक्त कारखाने के संबंध में अधिनियम के उपबंध प्रवृत्त थे, ऐसे किन्हीं उपबंधों का अनुपालन किया गया था या नहीं, निम्नलिखित कार्य करने के लिए सशक्त होगा: -

13, प्रकिया-सह-उत्पाद विकास केन्द्र, मेरठ

14. पेरूरकाडा/अकुलम फैक्ट्री त्रिवेन्द्रम तथा कांगला फैक्ट्री के नियमित और ठेका कर्मचारियों सहित रजिस्टर्ड (क) प्रधान या आसत्र नियोजक से अपेक्षा करना कि वह ऐसी जानकारी दे जिसे उपरोक्त निरीक्षक या अन्य पदधारी आवश्यक समझता है;

5166

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 5 , 2009/BHADRA 14 , 1931

एण्ड कॉर्पोरेट आफिस ऑफ हिन्दुस्तान लेटेक्स लिमिटेड, पूजापूरा , तिरूवनंतपुरम

15. राष्ट्रीय रसायन एवं उर्वरक लिमिटेड, मुम्बई 16. न्यूमंगलौर पोर्ट ट्रस्ट, मंगलौर

17. हिन्दुस्तान शिपयार्ड लिमिटेड, विशाखाट्नम 18. फर्टिलाइजर एण्ड कैमिकल्स ट्रावनकोर लिमिटेड ( एफएसीटी ) , उद्योगमंडल , केरल

19. हैवी इंजीनियरिंग कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , राँची तथा धुर्वा , राँची स्थित इसके 3 कारखाने

20. आईटीआई लिमिटेड , रायबरेली

21. हिन्दुस्तान ऑर्गेनिक कैमिकल्स लिमिटेड , अम्बालामुगल, एर्नाकुलम, केरल

[संख्या एस-38014/48/2008 - एस.एस. - 1 ]

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] period) , such returns in such forms and containing such particulars as were due from it in respect of the said period under the Employees ' State Insurance ( General ) Regulations , 1950 ;

(5) Any Inspector appointed by the Corporation under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 45 of the said ESI Act or other official of the Corporation authorized in this behalf by it , shall for the purpose of: -

(i ) Verifying the particulars contained in any return submitted under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 44 for the said period ; or (ii) Ascertaining whether registers and records were maintained as required by the Employees ' State Insurance (General ) Regulations, 1950 for the said period ; or

एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव

स्पष्टीकरण ज्ञापन

इस मामले में छूट को भूतलक्षी प्रभाव देना आवश्यक हो गया है क्योंकि छूट के आवेदन पर कार्यावाही करने में समय लगा । तथापि, यह प्रमाणित किया जाता है कि छूट को भूतलक्षी प्रभाव देने से किसी भी व्यक्ति के हित पर प्रतिकूल प्रभाव नहीं पड़ेगा । New Delhi , the 3rd September , 2009 S.O. 2453. In exercise of the power conferred by Section 88 read with Section 91 - A of the Employees ' State Insurance Act , 1948 ( 34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby exempts the regular employees of factories/ establishments specified in the schedule from the operation of the said Act for a period up to and inclusive of the 30th September,2010.

2. The above exemption is subject to the following conditions , namely: ---

( 1) The aforesaid establishment wherein the employees are employed shall maintain a register showing the name and designations of the exempted employees ;

(2) Notwithstanding this exemption , the employees shall continue to receive such benefits under the said Act to which they might have become entitled to on the basis of the contributions paid prior to the date from which exemption granted by this notification operates ;

(3) The contributions for the exempted period, if already paid, shall not be refundable;

(4) The employer of the said factory/establishment shall submit in respect of the period during which that factory was subject to the operation of the saidAct (hereinafter referred as the said ( iii) Ascertaining whether the employees continue to be entitled to benefits provided by the employer in cash and kind being benefits in consideration of which exemption is being granted under this notification ; or

( iv) Ascertaining whether any of the provisions ofthe Act had been complied with during the period when such provisions were in force in relation to the said factory to be empoweredto:

(a) require the principal or immediate employer to him such information as he may consider necessary for the purpose of this Act ; or

1 (b) at any reasonable time enter any factory, establishment, office or other premises occupied by such principal or immediate employer at any reasonable time and require any person found Incharge thereof to produce to such Inspector or other official and allow him to examine accounts , books and other documents relating to the employment ofpersonal and payment ofwages or to furnish to him such information as he may consider necessary; or

(c) examine the principal or immediate employer , his agent or servant, or any person found in such factory , establishment, office or other premises or any person whom the said inspector or other official has [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 5 , 2009/भाद्र 14 , 1931

5167

reasonable cause to believe to have been an employee ; or

Guntur , Nandyal , Secunderabad, Bangalore , Jallandhar , Bhatinda , Kurnool )

11 . ITI Limited , Palakkad , Kerala

(d) make copies of or take extracts from any register , account book or other document maintained in such factory, establishment , office or other premises;

12. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , (All Units)

13. Process -cum-Product Development Centre , Meerut

(e) exercise such other powers as may beprescribed.

6. In case of disinvestment/ corporatization , the exemption granted shall become automatically cancelled and then the new entity will have to approach the appropriate Government for exemption.

14. Registered and Corporate Office of Hindustan Latex Ltd. , Poojapura, Thiruvananthapuram (including Peroorkada/Akulam Factory , Trivandrum & regular &contract employees ofKangala factory)

SCHEDULE

15. Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. , Mumbai Sl . No. Name of the Establishment/Factory

16. New Mangalore Port Trust , Mangalore 1.

Semi Conductor Laboratory, SAS Nagar, Punjab 17. Hindustan Shipyard Ltd. , Visakhapatnam 2. Indian Rare Earth Ltd. , Udyogmandal , Kerala

18. Fertilisers and Chemicals Travancore Ltd. , ( FACT) , Udyogmandal , Kerala

3. Chennai Petroleum Corpn . Ltd. , Channai ( All Units)

19. Heavy Engineering Corporation Ltd. , Ranchi and its 3 factories at Dhurva, Ranchi

20. ITI Ltd. , Rae Bareli

4. Marine Workshop of Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. , Kolkatta

5. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , ( All Units )

21. Hindustan Organic Chemicals Ltd. , Ambalamugal , Ernakulam, Kerala

6. Hindustan News Print Ltd. , Newsprint Nagar P.O. Kottiayam , Kehala

[No. S- 38014/48/2008 -SS- I ] S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

7. Field Workshop of Tuticorin Port Trust, Tuticorin

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

8. Instrumentation Ltd. , Kota

9. Cochin Shipyard Ltd. , Cochin

10. National Seeds Corporation ( Central Stroes & Supply Division, New Delhi & its units at)

Ithas become necessary to give retrospective effect to the exemption in this case as processing of the applications for exemption took time. Howeve , it is certified that the grant of exemption with retrospective effect will. not affect the interest of any body adversely .

Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064

Printed by the Manager, Govt . of India Press, Ring Road, and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi- 110054.