This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्री सं० डी० एल० ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

REGD . NO . D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003-05 D.D.L.

सत्यमेव भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

नई दिल्ली , सितम्बर 6 सितम्बर 12 , 2009 , शनिवार/भाद्र 15- भाद्र 21 , 1931

सं. 37 ] No. 37] NEW DELHI , SEPTEMBER 6 SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009 , SATURDAY/ BHADRA 15- BHADRA 21 , 1931 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग 11-खण्ड 3-उप-खण्ड ( ii) PART II-Section 3-Sub- section ( ii)

भारत सरकार के मत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

वित्त मंत्रालय (वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग )

(आईएफ 1 अनुभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2454.-भारतीय निर्यात- आयात बैंक अधिनियम , 1981 ( 1981 का 28 ) की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खंड (ङ) के उप-खंड ( झ ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार , एतद्वारा , सुश्री पार्बती सेन व्यास , सचिव (ईआर ) , विदेश मंत्रालय को अगले आदेशों तक , श्री एन. रवि , सचिव ( पूर्व ) , विदेश मंत्रालय के स्थान पर भारतीय निर्यात- आयात बैंक ( एक्जिम बैंक ) के निदेशक मंडल में निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है । [फ़ा. सं. 24/27/2002- आई एफ -1 ( भाग III ) ] डॉ. हरमीत सिंह , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Financial Services)

(If. 1 Section)

New Delhi , the 25th August , 2009

S.O. 2454.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-clause ( i ) of clause (e) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 3175 GI /2009

(5169)

ofthe Export Import Bank of India Act , 1981 (28 of 1981 ) , the Central Government hereby nominates Ms. Parbati Sen Vyas , Secretary ( ER) , Ministry of External Affairs , as Director on the Board of Directors of Export Import Bank of India (Exim Bank) vice Shri N. Ravi , Secretary ( East) . Ministry ofExternal Affairs , until further orders.

[F. No. 24/27/2002- IF. 1 ( Part 111 ) | Dr. HARMEET SINGH , Under Secy . नई दिल्ली , 31 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2455.-राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबन्ध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) योजना , 1970/1980 के खण्ड 3 के उप- खण्ड ( 1 ) और खण्ड 8 के उप-खण्ड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उप-- धारा 3 के खण्ड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात, एत‌द्वारा , श्री बसंत सेठ ( जन्म तिथि 16-02-1952 ) , वर्तमान में उप प्रबंध निदेशक , भारतीय लघु उद्योग विकास बैंक ( सिडबी ) को उनके पदभार ग्रहण करने की तारीख से और 29-02-2012 तक की अवधि के लिए, अर्थात् उनकी अधिवर्षिता की तारीख तक, अथवा अगले 5170

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, सिंडीकेट बैंक के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक के पद पर नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. 9/8/2009-बी.ओ -1 ] जी.बी. सिंह , उप सचिव New Delhi , the 31st August, 2009 S.O.2455 . In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( a) of sub -section (3 ) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 read with sub -clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 and sub- clause ( 1 ) of clause 8 of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970/1980 , the Central Government, in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, hereby appoints Shri Basant Seth (DoB 16-2-1952) presently Deputy Managing Director, Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDBI ) as Chairman & Managing Director , Syndicate Bank from the date of taking charge of the post and for a period upto 29-2-2012 i.e. the date of his superannuation or until further orders , whichever is earlier .

[F. No. 9/8/2009- BO.1 ] G.B. SINGH , Dy. Secy.

कार्यालय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त जोधपुर , 27 अगस्त , 2009

सं. 9/2009-10/1398

का.आ. 2456.-आयकर अधिनियम 1961 ( 1961 का 43 वां) की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 ग ) के उपखण्ड ( via ) के साथ पठित आयकर नियमावली-1962 के नियम 2गए द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, जोधपुर एतद्वारा द राजस्थान मेडिकल सोसायटी एण्ड रिसर्च सेन्टर , सुमेरपुर को उक्त धारा के प्रयोजनार्थ निर्धारण वर्ष 2010-11 से आगे जब तक इसे वापस न लिया जाए तब तक निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुमोदित करते हैं:-

1. कर निर्धारिती उसकी आय का प्रयोग अथवा उसकी आय का प्रयोग करने के लिए उसका संचयन पूर्णतः तथा अनन्यतः उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई । 2. कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा तरीकों से भिन्न तरीकों से उसकी निधि ( जेवर - जवाहिरात , फर्नीचर आदि के रूप में प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करवा सकेंगा ।

3. यह आदेश किसी ऐसी आय के संबंध में लागू नहीं होगा , जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिए प्रासंगिक

[PART II--SEC . 3(ii ) ] नहीं हो तथा ऐसे कारोबार के संबंध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हो ।

4. कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष फाइल करेगा ।

5. विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियां और परिसंपत्तियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जाएंगी और उसका कोई भी भाग संस्थान के किसी सदस्य को नहीं दिया जाएगा । 6. आयकर अधिनियम की धारा 10 ( 23 ग ) के साथ पठित 115खखग में परन्तुक 15 की शर्तों में अनाम दानों के सम्बन्ध में यह अनुमोदन लागू नहीं होगा ।

[संदर्भ सं.-मुआ.आ./आ.अ. ( तक )/जोध/2009-10/1398 ]

सुरेन्द्र मिश्र , मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Jodhpur, the 27th August, 2009 No. 9/2009-10/1398

S.O. 2456. In exercise ofthe powers conferred by Sub- clause ( via) of clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income-taxAct, 1961 ( 43 of 1961 ) , read with rule 2CA of the Income Tax Rules , 1962 , I the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Jodhpur hereby approve " THE RAJASTHAN MEDICAL SOCIETY & RESEARCH CENTRE , SUMERPUR " for the purpose of the said Section for the assessment year 2010-11 onward , subject to the following conditions :-

1. the assessee will apply its income or accumulate for application wholly and exclusively to the objects for which it is established ;

2. the assessee will not invest or deposit its funds ( other than voluntary contribution recieved and maintained inthe form ofjewellery, furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous years relevant to the assessment years mentioned above otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub - section (5) ofSection 11 ;

3. this order will not apply in relation to any income being profits and gain of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee and separate books of accounts arc maintained in respect of such business;

5 4. the assessee will regularly file its return of income before the income-tax authority in accordance with theprovisions of Income- tax Act, 1961 ;

5. that in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organization with similar objectives and no part of the same will go to any of the members of the Institution;

5171

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6. The approval will not apply in relation to anonymous donations in terms of the fifteenth proviso to Section 10(23C) r.w.s. 115BBC of the Act.

[ Ref. No. CCIT/ITO (Tech .)/Ju/2009-10/ 1398 ] S. K. MISHRA , Chief Commissioner of Income Tax कार्यालय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त

जयपुर , 3 सितम्बर , 2009 सं. 08/2009-10

का.आ. 2457.-आयकर नियम , 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 वां ) की धारा 10 के खण्ड( 23 सी ) की उप धारा ( vi ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, जयपुर एतद्वारा , निर्धारण वर्ष 2008-2009 एवं आगे के लिए कथित धारा के उद्देश्य से " अरावली शिक्षण एवम अनुसन्धान संस्थान , नीम का थाना , सीकर " को स्वीकृति देते हैं ।

बशर्ते कि समिति आयकर नियम 1962 के नियम 2 सी ए के साथ पठनीय आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 की धारा 10 के उपखण्ड (23 सी) की उपधारा ( vi ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरुप कार्य करे । [क्रमांक: मुआआआआआ/ (मु. )/जय/ 10 (23 सी) (vi ) / 2009-10/2091 ]

बी. एस. ढिल्लों, मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Jaipur, the 3rd September, 2009 No. 08/2009-10

S.O. 2457.-In exercise ofthe powers conferred by Sub - clause (vi ) of clause (23C ) of Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961 ), read with rule 2CA ofthe Income-tax Rules , 1962 the Chief Commissioner of Income- tax, Jaipur hereby approves " Aravali Sikshan Avam Anusandhan Sansthan , Neem Ka Thana , Sikar (Rajasthan) " for the purpose of said section for the A. Yrs . 2008-2009 & onwards .

Provided that the society conforms to and complies with the provisions of sub - clause (vi ) of clause (23C ) of section 10 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 read with rule 2CA ofthe Income- tax Rules , 1962 .

[No. CCIT/JPR/Addl . CIT(Hqrs . )/ 10 (23C)( vi )/ 2009-10 /2091 ] B. S. DHILLON , Chief Commissioner of Income-tax

(राजस्व विभाग)

( केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )

नई दिल्ली , 31 अगस्त , 2009 सं. 63/2009

का.आ. 2458.-सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर

नियमावली, 1962 (उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5 ग और 5घ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2009-10 के आगे से संगठन सेंटर फार डेवलपमेंट आफ एडवांस्ड कम्प्यूटिंग , पुणे को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन " वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ " की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित कियां गया है , अर्थातः- (i) अनुमोदित " वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान संघ " का एक मात्र उद्देश्य वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करना होगा ;

(ii) अनुमोदित संगठन स्वयं वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान कार्य- कलाप जारी रखेगा ;

(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन बही - खाता रखेगा तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उपधारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

(iv) अनुमोदित संगठनः वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन :-

(क) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ (iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा ; अथवा

(ख) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप -पैराग्राफ (iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा ; अथवा (ग ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iv) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एवं प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेंगा ; अथवा (घ ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य कलाप करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य- कलाप को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा ; अथवा

(ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5 घ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम , की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरुप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[फा. सं. 203/84/2008- आ.क.नि. - 11] डा. संजय कुमार लाल , अवर सचिव 5172

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/ BHADRA 21,1931

(Department of Revenue)

(Central Board ofDirect Taxes)

New Delhi , the 31st August, 2009

No. 63/2009

S.O. 2458. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Centre for Development ofAdvanced Computing , Pune has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income- taxAct, 1961 ( said Act), read with rules 5C and 5D of the Income-tax Rules , 1962( said Rules) from assessment year 2009-2010 in the category of ' scientific research association ' subject to the following conditions , namely:--

(1) The sole objective of the approved ' scientific research association' shall be to undertake scientific research ;

(ii) The aproved organization shall carry out the scientific research activity by itself;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain books of accounts and get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section (2) ofSection 288 ofthe said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such Accountant to the Commissioner of Income-tax or the Director of Income- tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub - section (1) of Section 139 of the said Act .

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above.

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization :-

(a) fails to maintain books of accounts referred to insub -paragraph ( iii) of paragraph 1 ; or (b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research referred to in sub - paragraph ( iv) of paragraph 1 ; or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine ; or

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii ) of sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the said Act read with rules 5C and 5D of the said Rules .

[F. No. 203 /84/2008 /ITA - II ] Dr. SANJAY KUMAR LAL, Under Secy.

[PART 11--SEC . 3 ( ii ) | नई दिल्ली , । सितम्बर , 2009

सं. 64/2009

का.आ. 2459.-सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग और 5 घ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2008-09 के आगे से संगठन पी.एस.जी. एंड संस चेरिटीज फॉर दी यूनिट पी.एस.जी. कालेज ऑफ टेक्नोलॉजी, कोयम्बतूर को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगे ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थातः- (i ) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा ।

(ii) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा ;

(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग बही- खाता रखेगा अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उपधारा (2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;

(iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन :-

(क) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ (iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा ; अथवा

(ख) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा ; अथवा ( ग ) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iv) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा ; अथवा

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा ; अथवा

(ड. ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5घ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम , की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[फा. सं. 203/93/2008-आ.क.नि. - 11 ] डा. संजय कुमार लाल , अवर सचिव 5173

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the Ist September , 2009 No. 64/2009

S.O. 2459. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization P.S.G. & Sons Charities for the unit P.S.G. College of Technology, Coimbatore, has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 ofthe Income- tax Act, 1961 (said Act) , read with Rules 5C and 5E ofthe Income-tax Rules , 1962 ( said Rules ) from assessment year 2008-2009 onwards in the category of ' other Institution' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely :--

(i) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;

(ii) The aproved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students ;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an Accountant as defined in the explanation to sub - section (2 ) of section 288 ofthe said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such Accountant to the Commissioner of Income - tax or the Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case, by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 139 of the said Act;

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization :-

(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub - paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1; or

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub- paragraph ( iv ) of paragraph 1; or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine ; or

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of section 35 of the said Act read with rules 5C and 5E of the said Rules .

[F.No.203/93/2008 /1TA- II ] Dr. SANJAY KUMAR LAL, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 4 सितम्बर, 2009 सं. 66/2009

का.आ. 2460, सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5 ग और 5ड. के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2004-05 से आगे से संगठन थापर सेंटर फार इंडस्ट्रियल रिसर्च एंड डेवलपमेंट, पटियाला को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप सेअनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगी ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थातः-

(i) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा ;

(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग बही- खाता रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो, तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उपधारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(क) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अलग लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा ; अथवा

(ख) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा ; अथवा (ग) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एवं प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा ; अथवा 5174

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर 'देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा ; अथवा

(ङ ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5ग और 5ड. के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम , की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[फा. सं. 203/27/2009-आ.क.नि. - 11 ]

डा. संजय कुमार लाल , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 4th September , 2009

No. 66/2009

S.O. 2460. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Thapar Centre for Industrial Research & Development , Patiala has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii ) ofsub- section ( 1 ) of section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ( said Act) , read with Rules 5C and 5E of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (said Rules ) from Assessment year 2004-2005 onwards in the category of ' other Institution ' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(i) The sums paid to the approved organization shall beutilized for scientific research ;

(ii) The aproved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students ;

( iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate booksof accounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an Accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section (2 ) of section 288 ofthe said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income - tax or the Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 139 of the said Act;

( iv) The approved organization shall maintain a séparate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above.

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization :-

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] (a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub - paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1; or

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii) of paragraph 1 ; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub- paragraph ( iv) of paragraph 1; or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine ; or

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of section 35 of the said Act read with rules 5C and SE of the said Rules .

[F. No. 203 /27 /2009/ITA- II ] Dr. SANJAY KUMAR LAL, Under Secy.

संचार और सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय

(सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 31 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2461.-केन्द्र सरकार , एतद्वारा , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम (4 ) के अनुसरण में सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी विभाग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अंतर्गत आने वाली सॉफ्टवेयर टेक्नोलॉजी पार्क्स ऑफ इंडिया नामक स्वायत्त संस्था के आईटी पार्क, ईपीआईपी , सीतापुरा औद्योगिक क्षेत्र , टोंक रोड, जयपुर स्थित केन्द्र, जिसके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , को अधिसूचित करती है ।

[सं 7( 2)/2005-हि.अ. चन्दन कुमार चटर्जी, संयुक्त निदेशक MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

(Department of Information Technology) New Delhi , the 31st August , 2009

S.O. 2461.-In pursuance of Sub- Rule (4) of the Rule10 oftheOfficial Language ( use for official purposcs ofthe Union ) Rules , 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the Software Technology Parks of india , an autonomous society under the administrative control of the Department of Information Technology , locatedat IT Park , EPIP , Sitapura Industrial Area , Tonk Road , Jaipur , more than 80% staff whereof have acquired the working. knowledge ofHindi .

[No. 7 ( 2) /2005-H.S .

C. K. CHATTERJEE , Jt. Director 5175 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

नई दिल्ली, 7 सितम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 2462.-सार्वजनिक परिसर अधिनियम ( गैर अधिकृत निवासियों की निकासी ) , 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) के खण्ड 3 में विहित शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्र सरकार कथित कार्य के लिए भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड के अधिकारियों को जो कि नीचे दी गई तालिका के कालम (2 ) में उल्लिखित सरकारी राजपत्रित अधिकारियों के समकक्ष सम्पदा अधिकारी नियुक्त करती है । संपदा अधिकारियों के समान ही प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करेंगे और अपने कर्तव्यों का पालन करेंगे । ये सम्पदा अधिकारी उपरोक्त अधिनियम के अंतर्गत तालिका के कालम-3 में उल्लिखित अपने अधिकार क्षेत्र के सार्वजनिक परिसर के प्रभारी होंगे :

तालिका

क्र. सं. अधिकारी का पदनाम

सार्वजनिक परिसरों की श्रोणियाँ एवं अधिकार क्षेत्र की स्थानीय सीमाएं 1 2

1. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , आदिलाबाद के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 2. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , अनंतपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 3. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , कुडप्पा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 4. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला, गुन्टूर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

हैदराबाद एवं सिकंदराबाद में टाइप- V ( डी- II ) क्वार्टरों के लिए ।

5. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन ) कार्यालय मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार , आंध्र प्रदेश परिमंडल , हैदराबाद

6. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन ) कार्यालय प्रधान महाप्रबंधक, हैदराबाद दूरसंचार जिला , हैदराबाद

हैदराबाद एवं सिकंदराबाद में टाइप -1 से टाइप- IV क्वार्टरों एवं सभी भवनों/परिसरों एवं हैदराबाद और सिकंदराबाद में खाली पड़े स्थानों एवं हैदराबाद और रंगारेड्डी जिले के राजस्व स्थान ।

7. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला , करीमनगर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 8. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला, खम्माम के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 9. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला, कुरनूल के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 10. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला, महबूबनगर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 11. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , नालगौंडा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 12. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , नेल्लोर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , निजामाबाद के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 13. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

14. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला, ओंगोल के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 15. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला, राजामुंद्री के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 16. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , संगारेड्डी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 17. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , श्रीकाकुलम के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 18. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला, तिरुपति जिला चित्तूर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 19. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , विजयवाड़ा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 20. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , विशाखापट्टनम के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 21. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला , विजयानमरम के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 22. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , वारंगल के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 23. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( योजना एवं प्रचालन) मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार परिमंडल , गुवाहाटी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

24. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( योजना एवं प्रशासन) महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , कामरूप के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 5176

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

25. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( योजना एवं प्रशासन) महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला, तेजपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला , सिलचर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 26. महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार , सिलचर

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , नागाँव के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 27. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( योजना एवं प्रशासन )

28. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( योजना एवं प्रशासन ) महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , डिब्रूगढ़ के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 29. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( योजना एवं प्रशासन ) महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला, जोरहाट के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 30. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( योजना एवं प्रशासन ) महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , बोंगईगाँव के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , रायपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 31. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( सामग्री प्रबंधन एवं स्विचिंग योजना)

32. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला, रायपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 33. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , दुर्ग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला , बिलासपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 34. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , रायगढ़ के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 35. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

36. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एवं योजना ) महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , बस्तर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला , सरगुजा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 37. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

38. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( स्विचिंग योजना -11 ) मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार परिमंडल , राजस्थान के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , अजमेर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 39. मंडल अभियंता (योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , अलवर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 40. मंडल अभियंता (योजना )

41. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, बांसवाड़ा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, बाड़मेर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 42. मंडल अभियंता (योजना)

43. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , भरतपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, भीलवाड़ा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 44. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना)

45. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , बीकानेर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 46. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक , बूंदी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 47. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना )

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, चित्तौड़गढ़ के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 48. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, चुरू के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

दूरसंचार जिला अभियंता , जैसलमेर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 49. दूरसंचार जिला अभियंता ( योजना )

50. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना)

प्रधान महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , जयपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 51. मंडल अभियंता (योजना)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, झालावाड़ के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 52. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, झुनझुनू के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , जोधपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 53. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , कोटा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 54. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, नागौर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 55. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना) 5177 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

56. मंडल अभियंता (योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , पाली के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 57. मंडल अभियंता (योजना)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, सवाई माधोपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 58. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , सीकर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 59. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , सिरोही के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 60. मंडल अभियंता (योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, श्री गंगानगर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 61. मंडल अभियंता (योजना)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, टोंक के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 62. मंडल अभियंता (योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , उदयपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 63. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार उत्तर - पूर्व-1 परिमंडल , शिलांग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

64. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , मेघालय एसएसए , शिलांग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, मिजोरम, आईजोल के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन 65. मंडल अभियंता (योजना ) परिक्षेत्र ।

66. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, त्रिपुरा , अगरतला के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार, गुजरात परिमंडल , अहमदाबाद के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र नामतः

67. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( सामान्य ) , कार्यालय महाप्रबंधक, गुजरात दूरसंचार परिमंडल अहमदाबाद

अहमदाबाद डाक एवं तार काम्पलैक्स/वासना कालोनी /रनिप कालोनी/संचार कालोनी/ वस्त्रापुट कालोनी मानीनगर दूरसंचार/ बापू नगर कालोनी और शहलाम कालोनी 68. उपमंडल अभियंता ( सामग्री प्रबंधन ) महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , अमरेली के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र नामतः अमरेली/बागसर / चलालां/डैमनगर/रजूला/सावरकुंडला/ जाफराबाद/ धारी/ खम्बा/लाथी/बाबरा और लीला ।

69. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( योजना )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , भडूच के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 70. सहायक महाप्रबंधक (योजना )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , भावनगर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 71. मंडल अभियंता ( आन्तरिक अनुरक्षण ) महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , भावनगर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , भावनागर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 72. सहायक महाप्रबंधक , ( प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, भुज के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 73. उपमंडल अभियंता ( ओ सी.बी ) गांधीधाम

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, भुज के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 74. उपमंडल अभियंता ( स्थापना एवं अमला )

75. मंडल अभियंता (प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , गोधरा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 76. उपमंडल अभियंता ( सामान्य)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , हिम्मतनगर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 77. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, जामनगर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 78. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , जूनागढ़ के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, मेहसाना के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 79. उपमंडल अभियंता ( मानव संसाधन विकास )

80. उपमंडल अभियंता (भवन)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , नाडियाड के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 3175 G1/09--2 5178

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/ BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii )] 1

81.

टेलीफोन एक्सचेंज बिल्डिंग जोरावर पैलेस , पालनपुर ।

सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन एवं विधि) पालनपुर, अधीनस्थ महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला पालनपुर

पालनपुर , वड़गांव , डन्टा और धनेरा तालुक के सभी टेलीफोन एक्सचेंज बिल्डिंग एवं स्टाफक्वार्टर्स ।

82. मंडल अभियंता फोन्स पालनपुर अधीनस्थ महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला पालनपुर

कांकरेज , थराड और वाव तालुका के सभी टेलीफोन एक्सचेंज बिल्डिंग एवं स्टाफ क्वार्टर्स ।

83. मंडल अभियंता ( ग्रामीण ) डीसा अधीनस्थ महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला पालनपुर

डीसा के सभी टेलीफोन एक्सचेंज बिल्डिग एवं स्टाफ क्वार्टर्स ।

84. मंडल अभियंता फोन्स, डीसा अधीनस्थ महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला पालनपुर

देवदार रधनपुर एवं संतलपुर की सभी टेलीफोन एक्सचेंज बिल्डिंग एवं स्टाफ क्वार्टर्स । 85. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रचालन ) देवदार अधीनस्थ महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला पालनपुर

86. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, राजकोट के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 87. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( भूमि एवं भवन) महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , सूरत के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 88. उपमंडल अभियंता ( भवन)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , सुरेंन्द्रनगर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन. परिक्षेत्र । 89. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , वदोदरा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 90. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिल्म , काल्साड के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 91. उप महाप्रबंधक ( योजना )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , अम्बाला के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 92. उप महाप्रबंधक ( योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , फरीदाबाद के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 93. उप महाप्रबंधक ( प्रचालन एवं प्रशासन ) महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , गुड़गांव के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 94. उप महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन एवं योजना) महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , हिसार के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 95. उप महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन एवं योजना ) महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , जींद के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 96. उप महाप्रबंधक ( योजना एवं प्रौद्योगिकी ) महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, करनाल के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 97. उप महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन एवं योजना ) महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , रेवाड़ी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 98. उप महाप्रबंधक ( योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , रोहतक के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 99. उप महाप्रबंधक (योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , सोनीपत के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 100. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

प्रधान महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार कोयम्बटूर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 101. मंडल अभियंता ( आंतरिक योजना ) महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार , कड्‌डलोर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 102. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एवं योजना ) महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार धर्मपुरी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 103. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार एरोडे के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 104. सहायक महाप्रबंधक (योजना )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार करईकुडी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 105. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रसारण एवं योजना ) महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार मदुरै के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 106. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( योजना )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार नागरकोइल के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 107. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार नीलगिरी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 108. मंडल अभियंता (योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार पांडिचेरी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 5179 भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

109. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार सलेम के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

110. उपमंडल अभियंता ( योजना- II )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार तंजावुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

111. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रचालन )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार तिरूनालवेली के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 112. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार त्रिच्ची के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

113. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार धूटुकुडी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

114. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार वेल्लोर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

115. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

प्रधानाचार्य, राजीव गांधी मेमोरियल परिमंडल दूरसंचार प्रशिक्षण केंद्र, चेन्नै के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

116. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एवं योजना ) महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , अल्मोड़ा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 117. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( योजना )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , देहरादून के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 118. उपमंडल अभियंता ((योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, हरिद्वार के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 119. सहायक महाप्रबंधक (प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , नैनीताल के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , न्यू टिहरी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 120. उपमंडल अभियंता कार्यालय महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार , जिला, न्यू टिहरी

121. सहायक महाप्रबंधक (प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , श्रीनगर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, पूर्वी दूरसंचार क्षेत्र , क्षेत्रदास लेन , कोलकाता के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

122. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन ) पूर्वी दूरसंचार क्षेत्र , कोलकाता

123. मंडल अभियंता (प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , आसनसोल के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 124. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना एवं प्रशासनं) दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक बांकुरा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

125. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना एवं प्रशासन ) महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , बेहरामपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 126. उपमंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक कूचबिहार के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 127. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना एवं प्रशासन) महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, गंगटोक के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 128. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना एवं प्रशासन ) महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , जलपायगुड़ी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 129. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, खड्‌गपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 130. मंडल अभियंता (प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , कोलकाता के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

कोलकाता एवं उसके निकटवर्ती क्षेत्र ( शहरी क्षेत्र ए-1 में शामिल ) में क्वार्टर्स । 131. सहायक महाप्रबंधक (स्टाफ ) , कार्यालय मुख्य महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार , पश्चिम बंगाल दूरसंचार परिमंडल कोलकाता

132. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एवं वाणिजय ) महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , कृष्णानगर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 133. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना एवं प्रशासन ) महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला मालदा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 134. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना एवं प्रशासन ) दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक पुरुलिया के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

135. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना एवं प्रशासन) महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला रायगंज के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 136. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला सिलीगुडी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 137. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

उपमहाप्रबंधक, सूरी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

5180

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC.3 ( ii ) ] 1

138. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( भवन ) , कोलकाता महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, कोलकाता के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 139. मंडल अभियंता ( अभियांत्रिकी)

महाप्रबंधक अनुरक्षण , दक्षिणी दूरसंचार क्षेत्र , बेंगलोर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

140. मंडल अभियंता ( अभियांत्रिकी)

महाप्रबंधक अनुरक्षण, दक्षिणी दूरसंचार क्षेत्र , चेन्नै के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

141. मंडल अभियंता ( अभियांत्रिकी)

महाप्रबंधक अनुरक्षण , दक्षिणी दूरसंचार क्षेत्र , हैदराबाद के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

142. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( भवन)

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, उत्तरी दूरसंचार क्षेत्र , नई दिल्ली के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

143. मंडल अभियंता ( को - एक्सियल )

उपमहाप्रबंधक, अनुरक्षण , मुंबई के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 144. उपमंडल अभियंता (माइक्रोवेव )

उपमहाप्रबंधक सेटेलाइट अनुरक्षण , ठाणे के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 145. उपमंडल अभियंता ( तकनीकी)

उपमहाप्रबंधक, अनुरक्षण , नागपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 146. उपमंडल अभियंता ( तकनीकी)

उपमहाप्रबंधक, अनुरक्षण , पुणे के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

147. उपमंडल अभियंता ( तकनीकी)

उपमहाप्रबंधक, अनुरक्षण , अहमदाबाद के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

उपमहाप्रबंधक , अनुरक्षण , राजकोट के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 148. उपमंडल अभियंता ( यातायात एवं परख )

149. उपमंडल अभियंता ( तकनीकी)

उपमहाप्रबंधक, अनुरक्षण , भोपाल के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 150. उपमंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

उपमहाप्रबंधक , अनुरक्षण , जबलपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 151. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( योजना)

महाप्रबंधक , इलाहाबाद के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

152. सहायक महाप्रबंधक (योजना)

महाप्रबंधक , आजमगढ़ के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

153. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एवं योजना) दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक , बहराइच के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 154. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, बलिया के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

155. मंडल अभियंता

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक , बांदा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

156. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक , बाराबंकी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 157. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एवं योजना) महाप्रबंधक , बस्ती के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

158. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक , देवरिया के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

159. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एवं योजना ) दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, इटावा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

160. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक, फैजाबाद के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

161. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एवं योजना ) महाप्रबंधक , फर्रुखाबाद के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

162. मंडल अभियंता (योजना)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, फतेहपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 163. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, गाजीपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 164. मंडल अभियंता (योजना)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, गौंडा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

165. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( योजना)

महाप्रबंधक, गोरखपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

166. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एवं योजना ) दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक , हमीरपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 5181 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

167. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, हरदोई के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

168. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एवं योजना) दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक , जौनपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 169. मंडल अभियंता (योजना)

महाप्रबंधक , झांसी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र

170. सहायक महाप्रबंधक (प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, कानपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

171. मंडल अभियंता ( ट्रंक)

महाप्रबंधक , लखीमपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

172. सहायक महाप्रबंधक (योजना)

प्रधान महाप्रबंधक , लखनऊ दूरसंचार जिला के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्रः ।

173. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( भवन)

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, लखनऊ परिमंडल के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 174. मंडल अभियंता (योजना)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक मैनपुरी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

175. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक मऊ के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

176. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( योजना )

महाप्रबंधक, मिर्जापुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

177. मंडल अभियंता

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक ऊरई के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

178. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एवं योजना) दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक प्रतापगढ़ के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 179. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एवं योजना) दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक रायबरेली के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 180. मंडल अभियंता (प्रशासन)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, शाहजहांपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 181. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एवं योजना ) दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक सीतापुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक , सुलतानपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

182. सहायक महाप्रबंधक (प्रशासन एवं योजना )

183. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एवं योजना ) दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, उन्नाव के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक वाराणसी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

184. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार आश्वासन गुणवतता परिमंडल , बेंगलोर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

185. उप महाप्रबंधक ( कम्पोनेंट अनुमोदन दूरसंचार केंद्र ) कार्यालय मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार गुणवतता आश्वासन परिमंडल , बेंगलोर

186. उप महाप्रबंधक ( गुणवतता आश्वासन) मुख्य महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार गुणवतता आश्वासन परिमंडल , बेंगलोर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र , कोलकाता में ।

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, टी एंड डी परिमंडल , जबलपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन भवन , भूमि एंव आवासीय क्वार्टर्स +

187. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( अभियांत्रिकी) कार्यालय मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , टी एंड डी परिमंडल , संचार विकास भवन , रेजीडेंसी रोड, जबलपुर

188. उप महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन )

दूरसंचार फैक्ट्री, राइट टाउन , जिला जबलपुर , ( मध्य प्रदेश क्षेत्र ) के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

189. उप महाप्रबंधक ( दूरसंचार फैक्ट्री ), दूर्ग, छत्तीसगढ क्षेत्र

दूरसंचार फैक्ट्री , भिलाई , जिला दूर्ग, ( छत्तीसगढ़ क्षेत्र ) के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

190. उप महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार फैक्ट्री, रिछई दूरसंचार फैक्ट्री, रिछई, जबलपुर, ( मध्य प्रदेश क्षेत्र ) के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

191. उप महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन )

दूरसंचार फैक्ट्री, देवनार, मुंबई के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

1 5182

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009 /BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) | 1

192. उप महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

दूरसंचार फैक्ट्री, देवनार , मुंबई के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

193. उप महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन )

दूरसंचार फैक्ट्री, देवनार , मुंबई के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

194. उप महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन )

दूरसंचार फैक्ट्री, देवनार , मुंबई के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

दूरसंचार फैक्ट्री ,अलीपोर , 248 एजेसी बोस रोड कोलकाता के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।.

195. सहायक महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार फैक्ट्री, अलीपोर , कोलकाता

दूरसंचार फैक्ट्री , खड़गपुर, जिला मिदनापुर, पश्चिम बंगाल, खड़गपुर , के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

196. सहायक महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार फैक्ट्री , खड़गपुर

197. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , अमृतसर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 198. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, भटंडा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

199. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

प्रधान महाप्रबंधक, चण्डीगढ़ के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

200. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना -11 )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, फिरोजपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 201. मंडल अभियंता ( सामान्य)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , होशियारपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 202. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

प्रधान महाप्रबंधक, जालंधर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

203. मंडल अभियंता ( विधि)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, लुधियाना के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 204. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , पठानकोट के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 205. मंडल अभियंता ( ओसीबी)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , पटियाला के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 206. मंडल अभियंता ( मंडी गोबिन्दगढ़ )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, पटियाला के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 207. मंडल अभियंता ( ओसीबी )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, रोपड़ के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

208. मंडल अभियंता (योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , संगरूर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

209. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन )

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, अंडमान निकोबार परिमंडल के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

210. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन )

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, पूर्वी दूरसंचार परियोजना कोलकाता के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

जम्मूएसएसए के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

211. उपमंडल अभियंता ( भवन )

लेह एसएसए के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

212. मंडल अभियंता (फोन्स)

राजौरी एसएसए के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

213. उपमंडल अभियंता ( मानव संसाधन विकास )

214. उपमंडल अभियंता ( योजना )

श्रीनगर एसएसए के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

215. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना एवं प्रशासन ) उद्यमपुर एसएसए के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

216. उपमहाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार परियोजना , चेन्नै मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, दक्षिणी दूरसंचार परियोजना प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र, तमिलनाडु प्रदेश में ।

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, दक्षिणी दूरसंचार परियोजना प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र , केरल प्रदेश में ।

217. उपमहाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार परियोजना , एर्नाकुलम 5183

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

उपमहाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार परियोजना बेंगलोर

218.

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , दक्षिणी दूरसंचार परियोजना प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र , कर्नाटक प्रदेश में ।

219. उपमहाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार परियोजना , हैदराबाद मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , दक्षिणी दूरसंचार परियोजना प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र , आंध्र प्रदेश में ।

220. उपमहाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन )

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, एएलटीटीसी गाजियाबाद के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 221. उपमंडल अभियंता ( भवन)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , अहमदनगर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , अकोला के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 222. उपमंडल अभियंता , प्रभारी भूमि एवं भवन

223. मंडल अभियंता (योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , अमरावती के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 224. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , औरंगाबाद के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , बीड़ के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 225. उपमंडल अभियंता , प्रभारी भूमि एवं भवन

226. मंडल अभियंता (योजना )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , भंडारा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 227. उपमंडल अभियंता ( सामान्य)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , बुलढाणा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 228. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , चन्द्रपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 229. सहायक महाप्रबंधक, प्रभारी भूमि एवं भवन मुख्य महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार महाराष्ट्र परिमंडल मुंबई के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

230. उपमंडल अभियंता ( योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , धुले के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 231. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , गोवा पणजी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 232. उपमंडल अभियंता ( भवन)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , जलगांव के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।.

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, जालना के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 233. मंडल अभियंता ( मुख्यालय)

प्रधान महाप्रबंधक, कल्याण के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 234. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन )

235. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , कोल्हापुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 236. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , लातूर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

प्रधानप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , नागपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 237. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( उपकरण नियोजन )

238. मंडल अभियंता (शहरी )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , नांदेड के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 239. उपमंडल अभियंता (सामान्य)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , नासिक के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 240. उपमंडल अभियंता ( योजना )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , ओस्मानाबाद के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 241. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( योजना )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, परभानी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 242. मंडल अभियंता ( भवन)

प्रधान महाप्रबंधक, पुणे के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 243. मंडल अभियंता (अलीबाग)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, रायगढ़ के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 244. उपमंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , रत्नागिरी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 245. उपमंडल अभियंता ( भवन)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , सांगली के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , सातारा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 246. उपमंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन ) 5184

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[ PART II SEC. 3(ii ) ] 1

247. उपमंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

दूरसंचार जिला, प्रबंधक सिंधुदुर्ग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 248. उपमंडल अभियंता ( सामान्य)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , सोलापुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 249. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , वर्धा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 250. उपमंडल अभियंता (योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , यवतमाल के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 251. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( भवन)

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, चेन्नै टेलीफोन के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 252. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( स्वीचिंग एवं योजना ) मुख्य महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार परिमंडल उड़ीसा, भुवनेश्वर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

253. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रचालन )

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार परिमंडल उड़ीसा , भुवनेश्वर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

254. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( योजना)

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , हिमाचल प्रदेश परिमंडल के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

255. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( अभियांत्रिकी) मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, बीआरबीआरएआईटीटी, जबलपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

256. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( सामान्य)

*प्रधानः महाप्रबंधक, बैंगलोर दूरसंचार जिला के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 257. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( योजना)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , बेलगांव के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 258. मंडल अभियंता (शहरी )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, बेलारी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 259. उपमंडल अभियंता ( मानव संसाधन विकास ) दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, बीदर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 260. उपमंडल अभियंता ( सामान्य)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , बीजापुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 261. मंडल अभियंता (शहरी )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , चिकमंगलूर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 262. सहायक महाप्रबंधक (योजना )

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , देवनगिरि के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 263. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन एवं स्टाफ) प्रधान महाप्रबंधक, दक्षिण कनड ( मंगलोर) के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 264. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( सामान्य)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , धारवाड ( हुबली ) के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

265. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( सामान्य)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , गुलबर्गा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 266. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला, हसन के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 267. मंडल अभियंता (फोन्स)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , कोडगू ( मादीकेरी ) के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

268. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( भवन प्रभारी ) महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , कोलार के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला मांडया के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 269. कनिष्ठ दूर संचार अधिकारी , कार्यालय महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला मांडया

270. उपमंडल अभियंता ( भवन )

महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला , मेसूर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 271. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला, रायपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 272. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला , शिमोगा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 273. उपमंडल अभियंता ( मानव संसाधन विकास ) महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला , तुमकुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 274. सहायक महाप्रबंधक (योजना )

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , उत्तरा कन्नड ( कारवाड़ ) के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 5185

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

पटना के टाइप- IV से टाइप- VI तक के क्वार्टरों के लिए ।

275. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( स्थापना ) , कार्यालय मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , बिहार दूरसंचार परिमंडल, पटना

प्रधान महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला पटना के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 276. मंडल अभियंता ( योजना ) , कार्यालय प्रधान महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला पटना

277. उपमंडल अभियंता ( योजना- III )

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , गया के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 278. उपमंडल अभियंता (योजना-1 )

महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला , भागलपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 279. उपमंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , कटिहार के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 280. उपमंडल अभियंता (योजना )

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला, मुजफ्फरपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 281. उपमंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , दरभंगा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 282. उपमंडल अभियंता (योजना )

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , छपरा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 283. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एवं योजना ) दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, आरा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 284. उपमंडल अभियंता (फोन्स)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक , बेतिया के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 285. उपमंडल अभियंता ( इनडोर)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, बेगूसराय के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 286. उपमंडल अभियंता ( योजना)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक , मुगेर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 287. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एवं योजना ) दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, मोतीहारी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 288. मंडल अभियंता (प्रशासन)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक , समस्तीपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 289. उपमंडल अधिकारी (फोन्स)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, सहरसा के प्रशासत्तिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 290. उपमंडल अभियंता (प्रशासन)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, सासाराम के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 291. उपमंडल अभियंता ( योजना )

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, हाजीपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 292. दूरसंचार भंडार नियंत्रक , नई दिल्ली दूरसंचार भंडार नियंत्रक , नई दिल्ली -110023 के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

293. दूरसंचार भंडार नियंत्रक, चेन्नै

दूरसंचार भंडार नियंत्रक , 16 ग्रीमे रोड, चेन्नै-600006 के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

294. दूरसंचार भंडार नियंत्रक, मुम्बई

दूरसंचार भंडार नियंत्रक , फोसबेरी रोड मुम्बई -400033 के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

295. दूरसंचार भंडार नियंत्रक, जबलपुर

दूरसंचार भंडार नियंत्रक, राइट टाउन जबलपुर-482002 के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

296. दूरसंचार भंडार नियंत्रक, कोलकाता दूरसंचार भंडार नियंत्रक, पी -94 , ट्रांसपोर्ट डिपो रोड, कोलकाता-700088 के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

297. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , दीमापुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 298. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , ईम्फाल के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 299. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , ईटानगर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 300. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( भवन एवं योजना ) प्रधान महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार एर्नाकुलम , कोचीन 16 के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

301. सहायक महाप्रबंधक (प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , पथानमथिता के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 3175 G1/09--3 5186

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3( ii)] 1

302. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( उपकरण योजना ) महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , अलाप्पुझा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 303. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( केबल एवं योजना) महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , मालाप्पुरम के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 304. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( योजना )

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , कन्नूर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 305. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक दूरसंचार जिला , कोल्लाम के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 306. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( विधि एवं भवन) प्रधान महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , त्रिचूर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 307. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

प्रधान महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला, कोट्टायम के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

308. मंडल अभियंता (सतर्कता)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , पालाक्काड के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 309. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( योजना -1 )

प्रधान महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , कोझीकोड के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

310. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

प्रधान महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , त्रिवेन्द्रम के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

311. उप महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार, केरल परिमंडल के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 312. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला, आगरा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 313. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( योजना)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , अलीगढ़ के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 314. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , बरेली के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 315. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एवं योजना) दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, बदायूँ के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला , बिजनौर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 316. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन एवं योजना )

317. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन एवं योजना ) महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , बुलंदशहर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 318. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एवं योजना) दूरसंचार ज़िला प्रबंधक, एटा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 319. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , गाजियाबाद के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , गाजियाबाद के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 320. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( स्वीचिंग एवं योजना )

321. सहायक महाप्रबंधक (योजना )

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , मेरठ के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 322. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , मथुरा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचारं जिला , मुजफ्फर नगर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 323. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन एवं योजना )

महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला , मुरादाबाद के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 324. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन एवं योजना )

महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला, नोएडा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 325. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन एवं योजना )

326. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एवं योजना) दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक , पीलीभीत के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 327 मंडल अभियंता (फोन्स)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, रामपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला, सहारनपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 328. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन एवं योजना)

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, मध्य प्रदेश परिमंडल के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 329. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रचालन एवं अनुरक्षण )

330. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , भोपाल के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 331. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , ग्वालियर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 5187 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

332. उप मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला, मुरैना के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 333. मंडल अभियंता (प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , इन्दौर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 334. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला, जबलपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 335. मंडल अभियंता (प्रशासन )

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला, उज्जैन के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 336. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला , मंदसौर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 337. उप मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला , इटारसी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 338. उप मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, देवास के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

339. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक , धार के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

340. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, गुना के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

341. उप मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, खंडवा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 342. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक , खरगोन के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 343. उप मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक , रतलाम के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 344. उप मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक , रेवा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

345. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, सागर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

346. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक , शिवपुरी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 347. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक , विदिसा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 348. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, सतना के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

349. उप मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

दूरसंचार जिला अभियन्ता , दमोह के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 350. उप मंडल अभियंता

दूरसंचार जिला अभियन्ता , मांडला के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 351. उप मंडल अभियंता

दूरसंचार जिला अभियन्ता , सिवनी के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 352. उप मंडल अभियंता

दूरसंचार जिला अभियन्ता , रायसेन के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 353. उप मंडल अभियंता

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, सिधि के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

354. उप मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

दूरसंचार जिला अभियन्ता, शाहडोल के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 355. उप मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

दूरसंचार जिला अभियन्ता, झबुवा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 356. उप मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

दूरसंचार जिला अभियन्ता , बालाघाट के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 357. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक , बेतुल के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

358. उप मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, भिन्ड के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 359. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, छत्तरपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 360. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, छिन्दवाड़ा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 361. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, नरसिंहपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 362. उप मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन )

दूरसंचार जिला अभियन्ता , पन्ना के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 363. उप मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

दूरसंचार जिला अभियन्ता, बिउरा के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 364. सहायक महाप्रबंधक ( प्रशासन )

मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, झारखंड दूरसंचार परिमंडल , रांची के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 5188

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) | 2

365. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , धनवाद के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 366. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एव योजना ) दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक, डाल्टनगंज के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 367. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एव योजना ) दूरसंचार जिला प्रबंधक , दुमका के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 368. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन एव योजना) महाप्रबंधक , दूरसंचार जिला, हजारीबाग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 369. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला, जमशेदपुर के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र । 370. मंडल अभियंता ( प्रशासन)

महाप्रबंधक, दूरसंचार जिला , रांची के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण के अधीन परिक्षेत्र ।

[सं. 4-10/2003 - सम्पदा]

डा. विन्सेन्ट बारला , निदेशक ( एस. आर. )

New Delhi , the 7th September , 2009

S. O. 2462.-In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints the officers ofBharat Sanchar Nigam Limited mentioned in column (2) of the Table below being Officers equivalent to the rank of Gazetted Officers ofGovemment to be Estate Officers for the purposes of the said Act and further directs that the said Officers shall exercise the powers conferred , and the duties imposed , on Estate Officers , by or under the said Act, within the limits of their jurisdiction in respect of public premises specified in column (3 ) of the said Table:

TABLE

Designation of the Officer

SI . No.

Categories of public premise and local limits of jurisdiction .

(1)

(2)

(3)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District, Adilabad

DeputyGeneral Manager ( Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , DeputyGeneral Manager( (Administration)

Telecom District, Anantpur

3. Deputy General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Cuddapah

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager,

Telecom District, Guntur

DeputyGeneral Manager ( Administration)

Type- V (D - II ) quarters at Hyderabad and Secunderabad 5. DeputyGeneral Manager ( Administration) in the office of the Chief General Manager Telecom , Andhra Pradesh Circle ,Hyderabad

Type- 1 to Type IV quarters in twin cities Hyderabad and Secunderabad and all the Buildings/premises and vacant land inHyderabad and Secunderabad and revenue districts of Hyderabad and Ranga Reddy District.

6. DeputyGeneral Manager (Administration) in the Office ofthe Principal General Manager, Hyderabad Telecom District, Hyderabad

7. Deputy General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Karimnagar

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Khammam

8. Deputy General Manager (Administration)

Premisesunder the administrative control ofGeneral Manager, Telecom District , Kurnool

9. Deputy General Manager (Administration ) 5189 भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

(3)

(1) (2)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Mahaboobnagar

10. Deputy General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Nalgonda

11. Deputy General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Nellore

12. Deputy General Manager (Administration )

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Nizamabad

DeputyGeneral Manager (Administration ) 13 .

Premises under the administrative control ofGeneral Manager, Telecom District, Ongole

DeputyGeneral Manager (Administration) 14.

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District , Rajahmundry

Deputy General Manager (Administration) 15.

Deputy General Manager (Administration) 16.

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Sangareddy

DeputyGeneral Manager 17.

Premisesunder the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Srikakulam

(Administration)

Deputy General Manager 18.

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Tirupati , District, Chittoor .

(Administration)

Deputy General Manager 19.

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Vijayawada

(Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Visakhapatnam

20. Deputy General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Vizianagaram

21. DeputyGeneral Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Warangal

22. (Administration ) DeputyGeneral Manager

Premises under the administrative control of ChiefGeneral Manager, Telecom , Guwahati

23. DeputyGeneral Manager (Planning and Operation)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Kamrup

24. DeputyGeneral Manager ( Planning and Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Tezpur

25. DeputyGeneral Manager (Planning and Administration)

26. General Manager Telecom , Silchar Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District , Silchar

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Nagaon

DeputyGeneral Manager (Planning and Administration ) 27:

Premises under the administrative control ofGeneral Manager , Telecom District, Dibrugarh

28. Deputy General Manager (Planning and Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Jorhat

29. Deputy General Manager (Planning and Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Bongaigaon

30. DeputyGeneral Manager (Planning and Administration )

Premises under the administrative control of Chief General Manager, Telecom , Raipur

31. Assistant General Manager (Material Management and Switching Planning) 5190

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii)] (1) (2)

(3)

32. Divisional Engineer (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District, Raipur

33. Divisional Engineer (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District, Durg

34. (Administration) Divisional Engineer

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District, Bilaspur

35. Divisional Engineer (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Raigarh

Telecom District, Basthar Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , 36. Divisional Engineer (Administration and Planning)

37. Divisional Engineer (Administration)

Premisesunder the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Sarguja

38. Assistant General Manager (Switching Planning- 11 ) ,

Premises under the administrative control of Chief General Manager , Telecom , Rajasthan

39. Divisional Engineer ( Planning) .

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Ajmer

40. Divisional Engineer

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District, Alwar

(Planning)

41 . Divisional Engineer

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager , Banswara

(Planning)

42. Divisional Engineer

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Barmer

(Planning)

43. Divisional Engineer

(Planning)

Premises under the administrative control ofGeneral Manager , Telecom District, Bharatpur

44. Divisional Engineer

(Planning)

Premises under the administrative control ofGeneral Manager , Telecom District, Bhilwara

45. Divisional Engineer

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District , Bikaner

(Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Bundi

46. Divisional Engineer (Planning)

47. Divisional Engineer (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager , Chittorgarh

48. Divisional Engineer ( Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District, Churu

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Engineer , Jaisalmer

49. Telecom District Engineer (Planning)

50. Divisional Engineer (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of Principal General Manager , Telecom District , Jaipur

Premisesunder the administrative control of Telecom District Manager , Jhalawar

51. Divisional Engineer (Planning)

52. Divisional Engineer (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Jhunjhunu

53. Divisional Engineer (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control ofGeneral Manager , Telecom District , Jhodhpur

Premises under the administrative control ofGeneral Manager , Telecom District, Kota

54. Divisional Engineer (Planning) 5191 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

(3)

(1) (2)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Nagaur

55. Divisional Engineer (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District , Pali

56. Divisional Engineer (Planning)

57. Divisional Engineer (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager , Sawai Madhopur

Premisesunder the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District, Sikar

58. Divisional Engineer (Planning)

59. Divisional Engineer

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Sirohi

(Planning)

60. Divisional Engineer

(Planning)

Premisesunder the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District, Sri Ganganagar

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Tonk

61. Divisional Engineer (Planning)

62. Divisional Engineer

Premises under the administrative control ofGeneral Manager, Telecom District, Udaipur

(Planning)

63. Assistant General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Chief General Manager, Telecom , North Eastern - 1 Circle , Shillong

64. Divisional Engineer (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District , Meghalaya Secondary Switching Area, Shillong

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Mizoram , Aizawl

65. Divisional Engineer (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control ofGeneral Manager , Telecom District, Tripura , Agartala

66. Divisional Engineer (Planning)

67. Assistant General Manager ,. (General) in the Office of Chief General Manager Telecom, Gujarat Circle , Ahmedabad

Premisesunder the administrative control of Chief General Manager, Gujarat Circle , namely Ahmedabad P and T Complex/Vasana Colony/Ranip Colony/Sanchar Colony/ Vastraput Colony Maninagar Door Sanchar/ Bapu Nagar Colony and Shahalam Colony,

68. Sub Divisional Engineer (Material Management)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District , Amreli , namely, Amreli/Bagasara/Chalala/ Dannagar/Rajula/Savarkundlal /Jafrabad /Dhari / Khamba/Lathi / Babra and Lila

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District , Bharuch

69. Assistant General Manager (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Bhavnagar

70. Assistant General Manager (Planning)

71 . Divisional Engineer ( Internal Maintenance)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Bhavnagar

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Bhavnagar

72. Assistant General Manager (Administration)

73. Sub Divisional Engineer( OCB) Gandhidham

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District, Bhuj

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Bhuj

74. Sub Divisional Engineer (Establishment and Staff) 5192

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/ BHADRA 21 , 1931

(3)

(1) (2)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Ghodhra

75. Divisional Engineer (Administration)

76. Sub Divisional Engineer (General)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Himatnagar

Premisesunder the administrative control ofGeneral Manager Telecom District, Jamnagar

77 . Assistant General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Junagadh

78. Assistant General Manager (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Mehsana

79. Sub Divisional Engineer ( Human ResourceDevelopment)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Nadiad

80. Sub Divisional Engineer (Building)

Telephone Exchange Building , Joravar Palace , Palanpur, 81. Assistant General Manager (Administration and Legal ) Palanpur under General Manager Telecom District, Palanpur

All Telephone Exchanges Buildings and Staff Quarters at Palanpur , Vadgam , Danta & Dhanera Talukas

82. Divisional Engineer Phones , Palanpur under General Manager Telecom District , Palanpur

AllTelephone Exchanges Bluidings and Staff Quarters at Kankrej , Tharad and Wav Talukas

83. Divisional Engineer ( Rural ) , Deesa, under General Manager Telecom District, Palanpur

All Telephone Exchanges Buildings and Staff Quarters at Deesa 84. Divisional Engineer (Phones) , Deesa, under General Manager Telecom District , Palanpur

All Telephone Exchanges Buildings and Staff Quarters at Deodar , Radhanpur and Santalpur

85. Divisional Engineer (Operation) , Deodar under General Manager Telecom District, Palanpur

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Rajkot

86. Assistant General Manager (Administration)

87. Assistant General Manager ( Land and Building)

Premises under the administrative control of Principal General Manager Telecom District, Surat

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Surendranagar

88. Sub Divisional Engineer (Building)

89. Assistant General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Principal General Manager Telecom District, Vadodara

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Valsad

90. Assistant General Manager (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Ambala

91. Deputy General Manager (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Faridabad

92. DeputyGeneral Manager (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Gurgaon

93. DeputyGeneral Manager (Operation and Administration)

Telecom District, Hissar Premises under the administrative control of General Manager 94. (Administration and Planning) Deputy General Manager 5193

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(3)

(1) (2)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Jind

95 DeputyGeneral Manager (Administration and Planning )

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Karnal

96. Deputy General Manager (Planning and Information Technology)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Rewari

97. Deputy General Manager (Administration and Planning )

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Manager Telecom District , Rohtak

98. Deputy General Manager (Planning)

99. Deputy General Manager (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecorn District , Sonepat

100. Assistant General Manager

Premises under the administrative control of Principal General (Administration) Manager , Coimbatore

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom, Cuddalore

ΙΟΙ . Divisional Engineer ( Internal Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom, Dharmapuri

Divisional Engineer (Administration and Planning) 102.

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom, Erode

Assistant General Manager (Administration) 103.

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom, Karaikudi

104. Assistant General Manager (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom , Madurai

105. Assistant General Manager (Transmission and Planning )

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom , Nagercoil

106. Assistant General Manager (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom, Nilgiris

107. Assistant General Manager (Administration )

108. Divisional Engineer (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom , Pondicherry

109. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom, Salem

110. Divisional Engineer ( Planning - II )

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom , Thanjavur

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom , Tirunalveli

111. Assistant General Manager (Operation)

112. Divisional Engineer ( Administration) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom, Tiruchy

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Thoothukudi

113. Assistant General Manager (Administration )

114. Divisional Engineer ( Planning )

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom , Vellore

Premises under the administrative control of Principal Rajiv Gandhi

Memorial Circle Telecommunications Training Centre , Chennai 115. Divisional Engineer (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Almora

116. Divisional Engineer (Administration and Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Dehradun

117. Assistant General Manager (Planning)

3175 G1/09---4 5194

[PART 11-SEC. 3( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

(1 ).

(2)

(3)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Hardwar

118. Sub Divisional Engineer (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Nainital

119. Assistant General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, New Tehri

120. Sub Divisional Engineer in the Office ofGeneral Manager Telecom District , New Tehri

121 . Assistant General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Srinagar

Premises under the administrative control of Chief General Manager, Eastern Telecom Region , Kshetra Das Lane, Kolkata 122. Assistant General Manager (Administration ) , Eastern Telecom Region , Kolkata

Divisional Engineer (Administration) 123.

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Asansol

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Bankura

124. Divisional Engineer ( Planning and Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Berhampore

125. Divisional Engineer (Planning and Administration)

126. Divisional Engineer ( Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager , Coochbehar

127. Divisional Engineer (Planning and Administration )

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Gangtok

128. Divisional Engineer (Planning and Administration )

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Jalpaiguri

129 . Divisional Engineer ( Administration) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Kharagpur

130. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Kolkata

Quarters in Kolkata and its adjacent area ( Covered by A - 1 City area)

131 . Assistant General Manager (Staff) , in the Office of Chief General Manager Telecom , West Bengal Circle , Kolkata

132. Divisional Engineer (Administration and Commercial)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Krishnagar

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District Malda

133 . Divisional Engineer (Planning and Administration)

134. Divisional Engineer (Planning and Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Purulia

135. Divisional Engineer (Planning and Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District Raiganj

136. Divisional Engineer (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District Siliguri

137. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of Deputy General Manager, Suri

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Kolkata

138 . Assistant General Manager (Building), Kolkata

139. Divisional Engineer (Engineering) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Maintenance, Southern Telecom Region , Bangalore 5195 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

(3)

(1) (2)

140. Divisional Engineer ( Engineering) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Maintenance , Southern Telecom Region , Chennai

141 . Divisional Engineer (Engineering) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Maintenance , Southern Telecom Region , Hyderabad

Premises under the administrative control of Chief General Manager , Northern Telecom Region , New Delhi

142. Assistant General Manager (Building)

143. Divisional Engineer( Co-axial )

Premises under the administrative control of Deputy General Manager, Maintenance . , Mumbai

Premises under the administrative control of Deputy General Manager, Satellite Maintenance , Thane

144. Sub Divisional Engineer (Microwave)

145. Sub Divisional Engineer , Technical

Premises under the administrative control of Deputy General Manager , Maintenance. , Nagpur

146. Sub Divisional Engineer , Technical Premises under the administrative control of Deputy General Manager, Maintenance , Pune

147. Sub Divisional Engineer , Technical

Premises under the administrative control of Deputy General Manager , Maintenance , Ahmedabad

148. Sub Divisional Engineer , Traffic and Trail

Premises under the administrative control of Deputy General Manager , Maintenance, Rajkot

149. Sub Divisional Engineer , Technical

Premises under the administrative control of Deputy General Manager , Maintenance , Bhopal

Premises under the administrative control of Deputy General Manager, Maintenance. , Jabalpur

150. Sub Divisional Engineer , (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Allahabad

151. Assistant General Manager (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Azamgarh

152. Assistant General Manager (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager , Bahraich

153. Divisional Engineer (Administration and Planning)

154. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Ballia

155. Divisional Engineer

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Banda

156. Divisional Engineer ( Administration) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Barabanki

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Basti 157. Divisional Engineer (Administration and Planning )

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Deoria

158 . Assistant General Manager (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager,Etawah

159. Divisional Engineer (Administration and Planning)

160. Divisional Engineer( Administration) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Faizabad

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Farukhabad

161 . Divisional Engineer (Administration and Planning)

162. Divisional Engineer (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager Fathepur 5196

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/ BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii)] (1) (2)

(3)

163 . Divisional Engineer ( Administration) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager , Ghazipur

164. Divisional Engineer ( Planning )

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Gonda

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Gorakhpur

165. Assistant General Manager (Planning)

166. Divisional Engineer (Administration and Planning )

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager , Hamirpur

167. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Hardoi

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Jaunpur

168. Divisional Engineer (Administration and Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Jhansi 169 . Divisional Engineer ( Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Kanpur

170. Assistant General Manager (Administration)

171 . Divisional Engineer (Trunk)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Lakhimpur

Premises under the administrative control of Principal General Manager Lucknow Telecom District

172 . Assistant General Manager (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of Chicf General Manager . Lucknow Circle Office

173. Assistant General Manager (Building)

174. Divisional Engineer (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager , Mainpuri

175. Divisional Engineer (Administration ) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Mau

176. Assistant General Manager (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Mirzapur

177 . Divisional Engineer

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom Districi Manager ,Orai

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager Pratapgarh

178 . Divisional Engineer (Administration and Planning)

179. Divisional Engineer (Administration and Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Raebareli

180. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager , Shahjahanpur

181 . Divisional Engineer (Administration and Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Sitapur

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Sultanpur

182. Assistant General Manager (Administration and Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Unnao

183. Divisional Engineer (Administration and Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager . Varanasi

184. Assistant General Manager (Administration )

Premises under the adininistrative control of Chief General Manager , Quality Assurance Circle , Banglore .

185. Deputy General Manager (Component Approval Centre Telecom) in the office of Chief General Manager , Telecom Quality Assurance Circle , Bangalore 5197 भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(3)

(2)

(1)

186. DeputyGeneral Manager (Quality Assurance)

Premises under the administrative control of Chief General Manager, Telecom Quality Assurance Circle, Bangalore , at Kolkata

Building , Land residential quarters with in the jurisdiction of Chief General Manager , Technical and Development Circle , Jabalpur

187. Assistant General Manager (Engineering), in the office ofthe ChiefGeneral Manager , Technical and Development Circle , Sanchar Vikas Bhavan , Residency Road , Jabalpur.

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom factory ,Wright Town District . , Jabalpur Madhya Pradesh Region

188. Deputy General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom factory, Bhilai District ,. Durg , Chhatisgarh Region

189. Deputy General Manager (Telecom Factory) , Durg, Chhatisgarh Region

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom factory, Richhai District , Jabalpur , Madhya Pradesh Region

190. Deputy General Manager , Telecom Factory, Richai

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom Factory, DeonarMumbai

191. Deputy General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom Factory, DeonarMumbai

192. Deputy General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom Factory , Deonar Mumbai

193. Deputy General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom Factory , Deonar Mumbai

194. DeputyGeneral Manager (Administration ).

Premises under the administrative control of BSNI . Telecom Factory, Alipore , 248 , A.J.C. Bose Road , Kolkata

195. Assistant General Manager , Telecom Factory, Alipore, Kolkata .

Premises under the administrative control of BSNL Telecom l'actory, Kharagpur , District Midnapore , West Bengal . , Kharagpur 196. Assistant General Manager , Telecom Factory, Kharagpur .

197. Divisional Engineer ( Administration) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Amritsar

198. Divisional Engineer ( Administration ) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Bathinda

199. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of Principal General Manager, Chandigarh

200. Divisional Engineer (Planning- 11 )

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Ferozpur

201. Divisional Engineer ( General )

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Hoshiarpur

202. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of Principal Gencral Manager, Jalandhar

203. Divisional Engineer (Legal )

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Ludhiana

204. Divisional Engineer ( Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Pathankot

205. Divisional Engineer (OCB)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Patiala

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Patiala

206. Divisional Engineer (Mandi Govind Garh)

207. Divisional Engineer (OCB )

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Ropar 5198

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/ BHADRA 21 , 1931

(1) (2)

(3)

208. Divisional Engineer (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Sangrur

209. Assistant General Manager (Administration )

Premises under the administrative control of Chief General Manager , Andaman and Nicobar Circle

210. Assistant General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Chief General Manager , Telecom Project , Eastern Zone , Kolkata

211 . Sub Divisional Engineer (Building) Premises under the administrative control of Jammu , Secondary Switching Area

212. Divisional Engineer ( Phones)

Premises under the administrative control of Leh , Secondary Switching Area

Premises under the administrative control of Rajouri , Secondary Switching Area

213. Sub Divisional Engineer ( Human Resource Development)

214. Sub Divisional Engineer ( Planning) Premises under the administrative control of Srinagar, Secondary Switching Area

Premises under the administrative control of Udhampur , Secondary Switching Area

215. Divisional Engineer (Planning and Administration )

Premises under the administrative control of Chief General Manager, Southern Telecom Project in the state of Tamil Nadu

Deputy General Manager Telecom Project, Chennai 216.

Premises under the administrative control of Chief General Manager , Southern Telecom Project in the state of Kerala

DeputyGeneralManager Telecom 217 . Project, Emakulam

Premises under the administrative control of Southern Telecom Project Circle in the State of Kamataka

218. DeputyGeneral Manager Telecom Project, Bangalore

Premises under the administrative control of Chief General Manager , Southern Telecom Project in the state of Andhra Pradesh

219. DeputyGeneral Manager Telecom Project , Hyderabad .

220. DeputyGeneral Manager (Administration )

Premises under the administrative control of Chief General Manager , Advance Level Telecom Training Centre , Ghaziabad

221 . Sub Divisional Engineer (Building)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Ahmednagar

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Akola

222 . Sub Divisional Engineer in charge of Land and Building

223 . Divisional Engineer ( Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Amravati

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District , Aurangabad

224. Assistant General Manager (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Beed

225. Sub Divisional Engineer in charge of Land and Building

226 . Divisional Engineer ( Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District , Bhandaro

227. Sub Divisional Engineer (General ) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Buldhana

228. Divisional Engineer ( Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District , Chandrapur

Premises under the administrative control of ChiefGeneral Manager, Telecom , Maharastra Circle , Mumbai

229. Assistant General Manager Incharge of Land and Building

230. SubDivisional Engineer( Planning) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District, Dhule

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Goa , Panaji

231 Assistant General Manager (Administration) 5199

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(3)

(2)

(1)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Jalgaon

232. Sub Divisional Engineer (Building)

233. Divisional Engineer ( Headquarters) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Jalna

234. Assistant General Manager

Premises under the administrative control of Principal General Manager , Kalyan

(Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Kolhapur

235. Assistant General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Latur

236. Assistant General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Principal General , Manager, Nagpur

237. Assistant General Manager (Equipment Planning)

238 . Divisional Engineer ( Urban)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Nanded

239 . SubDivisional Engineer ( General)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Nasik

240. Sub Divisional Engineer ( Planning) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District, Osmanabad

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Parabhani

241. Assistant General Manager (Planning)

242. Divisional Engineer ( Building)

Premises under the administrative control of Principal General Manager , Pune

243 . Divisional Engineer (Alibaug)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District , Raigad

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Ratnagiri

244. Sub Divisional Engineer (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager . Telecom District, Sangli

245. Sub Divisional Engineer (Building)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Satara

246. Sub Divisional Engineer (Administration)

247. Sub Divisional Engineer (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager , Sindhudurg

248. Sub Divisional Engineer (General ) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager. Telecom District, Solapur

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager . Telecom District , Wardha

249. Assistant General Manager (Planning)

250. Sub Divisional Engineer ( Planning) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager . Telecom District, Yavatmal

Premises underthe administrative control ofChief General Manager , Chennai Telephones

251 . Assistant General Manager (Building)

Premises under the administrative control ofChief General Manager , Telecom, Orissa Circle Bhubaneswar.

252. Assistant General Manager , (Switching and Planning)

253. Divisional Engineer (Operations)

Premises under the administrative control of Chief General Manager , Orissa Circle Bhubaneswar .

254. Assistant General Manager (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of Chief General Manager, Himachal Pradesh Circle

255. Assistant General Manager (Engineering)

Premises under the administrative control of Chief General Manager, Bharat Ratna-Bhim Rao Ambedkar Institute of Telecom Training . Jabalpur 5200

[PART 11-SEC. 3(ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

(3)

(2)

(1)

256. Assistant General Manager (General ) Premises under the administrative control of Principal General Manager , Bangalore Telecom District

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District , Belgaum

257 . Assistant General Manager (Planning)

258 . Divisional Engineer ( Urban)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Bellary

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Bidar

259. Sub-Divisional Engineer (Human Resource Development)

260. Sub-Divisional Engineer (General ) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Bijapur

261 . Divisional Engineer ( Urban )

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Chikmangalure

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Davangere

262. Assistant General Manager (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of Principal General Manager , Dakshina Kannada ( Mangalore)

263. Assistant General Manager (Administration/Staff)

264. Assistant General Manager (General)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom, District , Dharwad (Hubli )

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Gulbarga

265. Assistant General Manager (General)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District ,Hassan

266. Assistant General Manager (Administration)

267. Divisional Engineer (Phones )

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager . Telecom District, Kodagu ( Madikeri )

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Kolar

268. Assistant General Manager Incharge of Building

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Mandya

269. Junior Telecom. Officer in the office ofGeneral Manager Telecom District , Mandya

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Mysore

270. Sub-Divisional Engineer (Building)

271. Divisional Engineer (Administration ) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Raichur

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Shimoga

272 . Assistant General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Tumkur

273 . Sub-Divisional Engineer (Human Resource Development).

Telecom District Uttara Kannada , ( Karwar ) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager 274. Assistant General Manager (Planning)

Type- IV to V1 Staff Quarters at Patna .

275. Assistant General Manager (Establishment) in the Office of ChiefGeneral Manager Telecom, Bihar Circle Patna

Premises under the administrative control of Principal General Manager, Patna

276. Divisional Engineer (Planning ) in the office of Principal General Manager Telecom District Patna

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Gaya

277. Sub-Divisional Engineer (Planning. 111 ) 5201

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(1) (2)

(3)

278. Sub-Divisional Engineer (Planning. I)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Bhagalpur

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Katihar

279. Sub-Divisional Engineer( Administration)

280. Divisional Engineer (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Muzaffarpur

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Darbhanga

281. Sub-Divisional Engineer (Administration)

282. Sub -Divisional Engineer (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Chhapra

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager , Ara

283. Divisional Engineer (Administration and Planning)

284. Sub- Divisional Engineer (Phones) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager , Bettiah

285. Sub-Divisional Engineer( Indoor)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Begusarai

286. Sub-Divisional Engineer ( Planning) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager , Munger

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Motihari

287. Divisional Engineer (Administration and planning)

288. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Samastipur

289. Sub-Divisional Officer (Phones)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Saharsa

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Sasaram

290. Sub- Divisional Engineer (Administration)

291. Sub- Divisional Engineer (Planning ) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom DistrictManager , Hajipur

292. Controller of Telecom Stores , New Delhi

Premises under the administrative control of Controller of Telecom stores , New Delhi - 110023

293. Controller ofTelecom Stores , Chennai

Premises under the administrative control of Controller of Telecom Stores, 16, Greame Road, Chennai -600006

294. Controller ofTelecom Stores , Mumbai

Premises under the administrative control of Controller ofTelecom stores, Fosbery Road Mumbai -400033

Premises under the administrative control of Controller of Telecom stores , Wright Town Jabalpur- 482002

295. Controller ofTelecom Stores , Jabalpur

296. Controller of Telecom Stores , Kolkata

Premises under the administrative control of Controller of Telecom stores , P- 94 , Transport Depot Road Kolkata - 700088

297. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Dimapur

298. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District, Imphal

299. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Itanagar

300 . Assistant General Manager (Building and Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of Principal General Manager Telecom . , Emakulam Cochin- 16

3175 GI/09-5, 5202

[PART II SEC. 3( ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

301. Assistant General Manager

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Pathanamthitta

(Administration)

302. Assistant General Manager

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager. Telecom District, Alappuzha

(Equipment Planning)

303 . Assistant General Manager (Cable and Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Malappuram

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Kannur

304. Assistant General Manager (Planning)

305. Assistant General Manager

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District , Kollam

(Administration)

306. Assistant General Manager ( Legal and Building)

Premises under the administrative control of Principal General Manager, Telecom District, Trichur

307. Assistant General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Principal General Manager, Telecom District Kottayam

308. Divisional Engineer (Vigilance)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Palakkad

309. Assistant General Manager (Planning-I)

Premises under the administrative control of Principal General Manager,Telecom District, Kozhikode .

310 . Assistant General Manager

(Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Principal General Manager, Telecom District , Thiruvananthapuram.

311. DeputyGeneral Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Chief General Manager , Telecom, Kerala Circle

312. Assistant General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Agra

313. Assistant General Manager

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District , Aligarh

(Planning)

314. Assistant General Manager

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District, Bareilly

(Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Badaun

315. Divisional Engineer (Administration and Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District, Bijnore

316. Assistant General Manager (Administration and Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Bulandshahar

317. Assistant General Manager (Administration and Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Etah

318. Divisional Engineer (Administration and Planning)

319. Assistant General Manager

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Ghaziabad

(Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Ghaziabad

320. Assistant General Manager (Switching and Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Meerut

321. Assistant General Manager (Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Mathura

322. Assistant General Manager (Administration)

323 . Assistant General Manager (Administration and Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Muzaffar Nagar 5203 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12 , 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(3)

(1 ) (2)

324.

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Moradabad

Assistant General Manager (Administration and Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Noida

325 . Assistant General Manager (Administration and Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Pilibhit

326. Divisional Engineer (Administration and Planning)

327. (Phones) Divisional Engineer

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager , Rampur

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Saharanpur

328. Assistant General Manager (Administration and Planning)

329. Assistant General Manager (Operation and Maintenance )

Premises under the administrative control of Chief General Manager , Madhya Pradesh Circle

330. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Bhopal

331. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Gwalior

332. Sub Divisional Engineer

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Morena

(Administration)

333. Divisional Engineer

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District, Indore

(Administration)

334. Divisional Engineer

(Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Jabalpur

335. Divisional Engineer

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District, Ujjain

(Administration)

336. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District, Mandsaur

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Itarsi

337. Sub Divisional Engineer (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Dewas

338. Sub Divisional Engineer (Administration)

339. Divisional Engineer ( Administration) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Dhar

340. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Guna

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Khandwa

341. Sub Divisional Engineer (Administration)

342. Divisional Engineer ( Administration) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Khargone

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager,Ratlam

343. SubDivisional Engineer (Administration)

344. Sub Divisional Engineer (Administration)

Premises urider the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Rewa

345. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Sagar

346. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Shivpuri

347. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Vidisha 5204

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3( ii) ] (1) (2)

(3)

348. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Satna

349. Sub Divisional Engineer (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Engineer, Damoh

350. Deputy Divisional Engineer

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Engineer , Mandla

351. Deputy Divisional Engineer

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Engineer, Seoni

352. Deputy Divisional Engineer

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Engineer, Raisen

353 . DeputyDivisional Engineer

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Engineer, Sidhi

354. Sub Divisional Engineer (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Shahdol

355. Sub Divisional Engineer (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Engineer, Jhabua

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Engineer, Balaghat

356. Sub Divisional Engineer (Administration)

357. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Betul

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Bhind

358. Sub Divisional Engineer (Administration)

359. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager , Chhatarpur

360. Divisional Engineer (Administration) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager , Chhindwara

361 . Divisional Engineer (Administration ) Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager , Narsinghpur

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Engineer, Panna

362. Sub Divisional Engineer (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Engineer, Biora

363. Sub Divisional Engineer (Administration)

364. Assistant General Manager (Administration)

Premises under the administrative control of Chief General Manager , Jharkhand Circle , Ranchi

365. Divisional Engineer ( Administration) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager Telecom District , Dhanbad

366. Divisional Engineer ( Administration and Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager , Daltonganj

367. Divisional Engineer ( Administration and Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of Telecom District Manager, Dumka

368. Divisional Engineer ( Administration and Planning)

Premises under the administrative control of General Manager, Telecom District, Hazaribagh

369. Divisional Engineer ( Administration) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District, Jamshedpur.

370. Divisional Engineer ( Administration) Premises under the administrative control of General Manager , Telecom District , Ranchi

[F. No. 4-10/2003-Estates)

Dr. VINCENT BARLA , Director ( Staff Relations) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

5205

भारत का राजपंत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय (स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 21 अगस्त , 2009

का.आ. 2463. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए और भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् केन्द्र सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्: -

2. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में सविता विश्वविद्यालय , ( सम विश्वविद्यालय ) चेन्नई द्वारा प्रदान की गई डेंटल डिग्रियों को मान्यता दिए जाने के संबंध में क्रम सं. 79 के सामने स्तम्भ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों के अंतर्गत सविता दंत चिकित्सा महाविद्यालय और अस्पताल , चेन्नई संबंधी निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां रखी जाएंगी :-

" ( ii ) दंत शल्य चिकित्सा स्नातक

बीडीएस , ( यदि यह 16-06-2009 को अथवा उसके उपरांत प्रदान की गई हो । )

सविता विश्वविद्यालय (सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , चेन्नई "

[फा. सं. वी. 12017/38/2009 -डी.ई . ]

आर. शंकरन , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (Department of Health and Family Welfare) New Delhi , the 21st August, 2009 S.O. 2463. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 2 ) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of1948 ) , the Central Government , after consultation with theDental Council of India , hereby , makes the following amendments in Part- 1 of the Schedule to the said Act , namely :-

2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 79, in Part - I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) pertainingto recognition ofdental degree awarded by Saveetha University ( Deemed University) , Chennai , the following entries in respect of Saveetha Dental College & Hospital , Chennai , shall be inserted thereunder :--

BDS, Saveetha "(ii) Bachelor of Dental Surgery (ifgranted on or after 16-6-2009 ) University

(Deemed

University),

Chennai"

[F. No. V. 12017/38/2009-DE]

R. SANKARAN , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 21 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2464. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप - धारा ( 4 ) के खंड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग- III में एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है; अर्थात्:-

2. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग- III में क्रम सं. 96 के बाद स्तम्भ 1,2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों के अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां जोड़ी जाएंगी; अर्थात:-

" 97. यूनिवर्सिटी ऑफ लोवा , यूएस ए

भारतीय विश्वविद्यालयों द्वारा प्रदत्त मास्टर डिग्री ( एम एस ) मास्टर डिग्री (एम एस ) एम डी एस (जन स्वास्थ्यदंत चिकित्सा) यूनिवर्सिटी ऑफ लोवा, यू एस ए ' के समतुल्य ( यदि 19-12-1997 अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो) "

[सं. वी. 12018/2/2007-डी.ई. ]

आर. शंकरन , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st August, 2009

S.O. 2464. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) sub - section (4) of section 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948) , and after consultation with the Dental Council of India, Central Government hereby , makes the following further amendments in Part - III of the Schedule to the said Act , namely :--

2. Under the existing entries of column 1 , 2 & 3 after Serial Number 96 in Part - III of the Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) the following entries shallbe added , namely:-

"97. University of Lowa, USA

MasterDegree

(MS) equivalent

to Master Degree (MS), MDS

(PublicHealth

Dentistry)

University of Lowa, USA . awarded by Indian Universities ." (ifgranted on or after 19-12-1997)

[No. V. 12018/2/2007 -DE] R. SANKARAN , Under Sccy.

5206

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 21 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2465.- केन्द्र सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए और भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्:-

2. कुरूक्षेत्र विश्वविद्यालय , कुरूक्षेत्र द्वारा प्रदत्त दन्त चिकित्सा डिग्रियों से संबंधित दन्त चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम सं. 39 के सामने स्तम्भ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में नीचे निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां अंतःस्थापित की जाएंगी.:-

" V. स्वामी देवी दयाल अस्पताल एवं कालेज , पंचकूला, हरियाणा

" ( i ) दंत शल्य-चिकित्सा स्नातक बीडीएस, कुरूक्षेत्र विश्वविद्यालय , ( यदि यह 19-08-2008 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो । ) कुरूक्षेत्र"

[फा. सं. वी. 12017/22/2002 -डी.ई. ]

आर. शंकरन , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st August, 2009 S.O. 2465. In exercise of the powers conferredby sub - section (2 ) of section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948), the Central Government , after consultation with the Dental Council of India, hereby, makes the following amendments in Part- 1 of the Schedule to the said Act, namely:

2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 39 , in Part - 1 of the Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948 ) pertaining to recognition ofdental degrees awarded by Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, the following entries shall be inserted thereunder :-- "V. Swami Devi Dyal Hospital & Dental College , Panchkukla , Haryana

BDS, Kurukshetra University, Kurukeshetra" (i) Bachelor ofDental Surgery ( if granted on or after 19-8-2008)

[F. No. V. 12017/22 /2002 -DE]

R. SANKARAN , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 21 अगस्त, 2009

का.अ. 2466. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 (1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए और भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् केन्द्र सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में एतद् द्वारा निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है ; अर्थात्:-

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 2. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में कालीकट विश्वविद्यालय , केरल द्वारा प्रदान की गई डेंटल डिग्रियों को मान्यता दिए जाने के संबंध में क्रम सं. 30 के सामने स्तम्भ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां रखी जाएंगी; अर्थात:-

" II रोयाल डेंटल कॉलेज , चेलीसरी , केरल

बीडीएस, कालीकट

विश्वविद्यालय , (i ) दंत शल्य चिकित्सा स्नातक (यदि यह 30-8-2008 को अथवा उसके उपरांत प्रदान की गई हो । ) केरल "

[फा. सं. वी. 12017/38/2002-डी.ई. ]

आर. शंकरन , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st August, 2009

S.O. 2466. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (2 ) of section 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 (16 of 1948), the Central Government, after consultation with the Dental Council of India, hereby , makes the following amendments in Part - I of the Schedule to the said Act, namely :-

2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 30 , in Part - I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948( 16 of 1948) pertaining to recognition of dental degree awarded by University of Calicut , Kerala, the following entries shall be inserted thereunder :--

" II . Royal Dental College , Chalissery, Kerala

(i) Bachelor ofDental

ofCalicut,

BDS, University, Kerala"

Surgery (if granted on or after30-8-2008)

[F. No. V. 12017/38/2002- DE]

R. SANKARAN , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 21 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2467.- दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्द्वारा भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है ; अर्थात्:-

2. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम सं. 79 के बाद निम्नलिखित क्रम संख्या और प्रविष्टियां अन्तः स्थापित की जाएंगी; अर्थात:-

5207

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

"80. दत्ता मेघे आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान ( सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , वर्धा

1. शरद पवार डेंटल कालेज एवं अस्पताल वर्धा (i ) दंत शल्य चिकित्सा स्नातक

(यदि यह 16-06-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो)

( ii ) दंत शल्य-चिकित्सा निष्णात- मुख विकृति विज्ञान ( यदि यह 28-4-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो)

प्रोस्थोडोंटिक्स

(यदि यह 28-4-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो)

मुख शल्य चिकित्सा (यदियह 28-4-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो)

कंजरवेटिव डेंटिस्टरी

(यदि यह 5-5-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

मुख आयुर्विज्ञान ( यदि यह 5-5-2009 को अभवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो)

पेरियोडोंटिक्स ( यदि यह 5-5-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो)

आर्थोडोंटिक्स (यदि यह 5-5-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

बीडीएस , दत्ता मेघे आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान (सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , वर्धा

एमडीएस , ( मुख विकृति विज्ञान ) , दत्ता मेघे आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान ( सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , वर्धा.

एमडीएस ( प्रोस्थो. ) , दत्ता मेघे आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान (सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , वर्धा

एमडीएस ( मुख शल्य चिकित्सा ) , दत्ता मेघे आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान ( सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , वर्धा एमडीएस ( कंजरवेटिव डेंटिस्टरी ) , दत्ता मेघे आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान ( सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , वर्धा एमडीएस (मुख आय. ) , दत्ता मेघे आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान (सम विश्वविद्यालय ) , वर्धा

एमडीएस ( पेरियो. ) , दत्ता मेघे आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान (सम विश्वविद्यालय) , वर्धा

एमडीएस ( आर्थो. ) , दत्ता मेघ आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान ( सम विश्वविद्यालय) , वर्धा

[फा. सं. वी . 12017/39/2009-डी.ई. ]

आर. शंकरन , अवर सचिव

New Delki , the 21st August, 2009

S.O. 2467. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 2) of section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of1948), the Central Government, after consulation with the Dental Council of India, hereby, makes the following amendments in Part - I of the Schedule to the said Act , namely:-

2. In Part- I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948) after Serial No. 79 , the following Serial number and entries shall be inserted namely:-

"80 DattaMeghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed University), Wardha

1.Sharad Pawar Dental College & Hospital, Wardha

(i)Bachelor ofDental Surgery (ifgranted on or after 16-6-2009) (ii)Master ofDental Surgery OralPathology (ifgranted on or after 28-4-2009) BDS , Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences(Deemed University) , Wardha MDS , (Oral Path .) , Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences ( Deemed University ), Wardha 5208

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009 /BHADRA 21 , 1931

[ PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Prosthodontics (ifgranted on or after 28-4-2009 )

MDS , ( Prostho. ) , Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed University ) , Wardha

OralSurgery (ifgranted on or after 28-4-2009 )

MDS , (Oral Surgery) , Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed University), Wardha

Conservative Dentistry (ifgranted on or after 5-5-2009)

MDS, (Cons . Dentistry) , Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences ( Deemed University) , Wardha

OralMedicine (ifgranted on or after 5-5-2009)

MDS , (OralMedicine ) , Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences ( Deemed University), Wardha

Periodontics (ifgranted on or after 5-5-2009)

MDS , (Periodontics ) , Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed University ) , Wardha

Orthodontics (ifgranted on or after 5-5-2009)

MDS, (Orthodontics) , Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed University), Wardha

[No. V. 12017/39/2009- DE ] R. SANKARAN, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2468.- केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) (ख ) के अनुसरण भावनगर विश्वविद्यालय का प्रतिनिधित्व करने वाले डॉ. एस. वी. पटेल को दिनांक 23-11-2006 से भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् के एक सदस्य के रूप में निर्वाचित किया गया था ।

जबकि डॉ. एस. वी. पटेल ने सूचित किया है कि उन्हें भावनगर विश्वविद्यालय से हेमचन्द्राचार्य उत्तरी गुजरात विश्वविद्यालय में स्थानांतरित किया गया है और वे अब भावनगर विश्वविद्यालय की शैक्षणिक परिषद् के सदस्य नहीं हैं । अतः भावनगर विश्वविद्यालय का प्रतिनिधित्व करने वाले डॉ. एस. वी. पटेल की भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् की सदस्यता समाप्त हो गई है ।

इसलिए अब , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उप - धारा ( 3 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में भावनगर विश्वविद्यालय का प्रतिनिधित्व करने वाले डॉ. एस. वी. पटेल की भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् की सदस्यता को दिनांक 19-6-2009 से समाप्त हुआ माना जाएगा ।

[सं. वी . 11013 /10/2009 - एम. ई. ( नीति-1 ) ]

आर. शंकरन , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 25th August , 2009

S.O. 2468. Whereas in pursuance of the provision of sub - section ( 1 ) (b) of section 3 of the Indian Medical Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) Dr. S. V. Patel was elected as a member of the Medical Council of India representing Bhavnagar University with effect from 23-11-2006 .

Whereas Dr. S.V. Patel has informed that be has been transferred from Bhavnagar University to Hemchandracharya NorthGujarat University and is no more a member of Academic Council of Bhavnagar University . Therefore, Dr. S.V. Patel has ceased to be a member of Medical Council of India representing Bhavnagar University.

Now, therefore , in pursuance of the provision of sub - section ( 3 ) of Section 7 of the said Act, Dr. S.V. Patel shall be deemed to have ceased to be a member of the Medical Council of India representing Bhavnagar University with effect from 19-6-2009.

[No. V. - 11013/10/2009 - ME (Policy- 1 ) ]

R. SANKARAN , Under Secy .

5209

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 31 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2469.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 12 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए और केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम की दूसरी अनुसूची में एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:-

उक्त अनुसूची में शीर्षक " नेपाल " के अंतर्गत , " बी.पी. कोइराला स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान संस्थान , धारन, नेपाल " के सामने विषयों के " शीर्षक " [ इसके आगे स्तम्भ ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] , ' डिप्लोमा में उल्लिखित योग्यताओं का स्वरूप ' [ इसके आगे स्तम्भ ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] और ' संक्षेपण ' [ इसके आगे स्तम्भ ( 4 ) के रूप में संदर्भित के अंतर्गत , अंतिम प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित को रखा जाएगा , अर्थात्: - (3)

(4)

(2)

" एम डी ( बाल " आयुर्विज्ञान वाचस्पति

चिकित्सा) " (बाल चिकित्सा) "

बी० पी. के. आई.एच. एस. धारन , नेपाल ( यह मान्यताप्राप्त अर्हता होगी यदि यह बी.पी. कोइराला स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान संस्थान , धारन , नेपाल में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे छात्रों के लिए बी.पी. कोइराला स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान संस्थान , धारन , नेपाल ( सम विश्वविद्यालय ) द्वारा 2001 को या इसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

[सं. वी. 11015 /1 /2009- एम्. ई. ( पी-1 ) ]

आर शंकरन , अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 31st August, 2009

S.O. 2469. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (2) ofthe section 12 of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) , the Central Government after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following further amendments in the Second Schedule to the said Act , namely :-

In the said Schedule under the heading "Nepal " against " B. P. O. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal " , under the headings ' Title ' [ hereinafter referred to as column (2) ] , ' Nature of qualifications as stated in diploma ' [hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ] and " Abbreviation " (hereinafter referred to as column ( 4) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto the following shall be inserted , namely:-

(4)

"MD ( Paediatrics) " " Doctor in Medicine (Paediatrics)"

(2) (3) B.P.K.1.H.S. Dharan, Nepal [Thisshall be a recognized qualification when granted by B.P. Koirala Institute ofHealth Sciences , Dharan , Nepal ( Deemed University) in respect of students being trained at B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences , Dharan, Nepal on orafter2001 ]

[No. V. - 11015/1 /2009 -ME (P- I) ] R. SANKARAN , Under Secy.

उपभोक्तामामले, खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली , 21 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2470.- भारतीय भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वह स्थापित हो गया है :-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों) की संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक संख्या

नए भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

(1)

(2)

1-1-2010

आई. एस. 8828: 1996

1. आई एस/ आई ई सी 60898-1: 2002 विद्युत उपस्कर - घरेलू और संस्थापनों के लिए ओवरकरंट से सुरक्षा हेतु परिपथ वियोजक भाग । प्रत्यार्वी धारा के प्रचालन के लिए परिपथ वियोजक

3175 G1/09-6 5210

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] इस भारतीय मानक की एक प्रति भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई सभा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटमा, पूणे तथा तिरुवनन्तपुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं।

[संदर्भ: ईटी 07/टी-25 ]

आर. के. नेहन , वैज्ञा. एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी ) MINISTRY OF CONSUMERAFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DESTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

New Delhi , the 21st August, 2009

S.O. 2470. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standard Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies the Indian Standards to the Indian Standards, particulars of which is given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued.

SCHEDULE

SINo. No. & Year of the Indian Standard

Date of Establishment

No. and Year of the Indian Standards , if any, superseded by the New Indian Standard

(1) (2)

(3)

(4)

1-1-2010 1.

IS 8828 : 1996 Electrical Accessories- CircuitBreakers for Over Current Protection forHousehold and Similar Installations

IS/IEC 60898-1 /2002 Electrical Accessories- Circuit-breakers for over current protection forhousehold and similar installations Part 1 Circuit breakers for a.c. operation

Copy of thisStandard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices, New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices, Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: ET07/T- 25]

R..K . TREHAN , Scientist E and Head ( Electrotechnical )

नई दिल्ली, 21 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2471.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वह स्थापित हो गया है : -

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

(2)

(3)

(4) (1 )

1 .

। अक्तूबर , 2009 आई एस 12640 ( भाग 1 ) : 2008 घरेलू एवं समान प्रयोजनों के लिए अवशिष्ट करंट चालित सर्किट वियोजक भाग । समेकित अतिधारा संरक्षण रहित सर्किट वियोजक ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय मानक की एक प्रति भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना , पूणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: ईटी 07/टी-34]

आर. के. त्रेहन , वैज्ञा. ई. एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी) 5211 भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/भाর 21 , 1931

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 21st August, 2009

S.O. 2471. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies the Indian Standards to the Indian Standards , particulars of which is given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued.

SCHEDULE

No. & Year of Indian Standard

Sl No.

Dateof Establishment

No. and Year of the Indian Standards , if any , Supersededby the New Indian Standard

(3)

(4) (1)

(2)

1October , 2009 IS 12640 ( Part- 1 ) : 2008 Residual current operated circuit-breakers for household and similar uses: Part 1 Circuit-breakers without integral overcurrent protection (RCBs) (First Revision)

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal, Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: ET07/T - 34 ]

R. K. TREHAN, Scientist E and Head ( Electrotechnical )

नई दिल्ली, 21 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2472.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 कोउपनियम( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वह वे स्थापित हो गया है:-

अनुसूजी

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या, वर्ष और शीर्षक

क्रम संख्या

(3)

(4) (2)

(1)

1 अक्तूबर , 2009 1 . आई एस 12640 ( भाग 2) : 2008 घरेलू समान प्रयोजनों के लिए अवशिष्ट करंट चालित सर्किट वियोजक भाग 2 समेकितअतिधारा संरक्षण रहित सर्किट वियोजक ( पहला पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय मानक की एक प्रति भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो, मानक भवन, 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर, कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं।

[संदर्भ: ईटी 07/टी-44]

आर. केः त्रेहन , वैज्ञाः ई एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी) 5212

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/ BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )|

New Delhi , the 21st August, 2009

S.O. 2472. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies the Indian Standards to the Indian Standards , particulars of which is given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued .

SCHEDULE

No. & Year of the Indian Standard

SI No.

Date of Establishment

No. and Year of the Indian Standards , if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(1)

(4) (2)

(3)

1October , 2009 IS 12640 ( Part- 2) : 2008 Residual current operated circuit-breakers for household and similar uses : Part 2 Circuit- breakers without integral overcurrent protection (RCBs) (First Revision)

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur, Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: ET 07/ 1-441

R. K. TREHAN , Scientist E and Head ( Electrotechnical )

नई दिल्ली, 21 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2473.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खण्ड (ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वह वे स्थापित हो गया है : -

अनुसूची

स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

स्थापित तिथि क्रम संख्या

नए भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों , यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

(2)

(3)

(1)

(4)

1-1-2010 1.

आई. एस. 8828 : 1996

आई एस/ आई सी 60898-2( 2003 ) विद्युत उपस्कर - घरेलू और संस्थापनों के लिए ओवरकरंट से सुरक्षा हेतु परिपथ वियोजक भाग 2 प्रत्यावर्ती धारा और दिष्ट धारा के प्रचालन के लिए परिपथ वियोजक

इस भारतीय मानक की एक प्रति भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना , पूणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : ईटी 07/टी -50]

आर. के. त्रेहन , वैज्ञा. ई एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी)

New Delhi , the 21st August , 2009

S.O. 2473. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies the Indian Standards to the Indian Standards, particulars of which is given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued .

5213

सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

भारत का राजपत्र :

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

No. & Year of the Indian Standard

Sl No.

(1)

(2)

I. IS/IEC 60898-2 :2003 Electrical Accessories- Circuit-breakers for over current protection for household and similar installations Part 2 Circuit breakers for a.c. and dc operation

SCHEDULE

Date of Establishment No. and Year of the Indian Standards , if any, superseded by the New Indian Standard

(4) (3)

1-1-2010 IS 8828 : 1996 Electrical Accessories- CircuitBreakers for Over Current Protection for Household and Similar Installations

Copy ofthis Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune , Tairuvananthapuram .

[Ref: ET07/T- 50 R. K. TREHAN, Scientist E and Head ( Electrotechnical )

नई दिल्ली , 26 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2474.- भारतीय भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया है/किये गये हैं :

संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष क्रम संख्या

(2)

(1)

1 . 13826 ( भाग 4 ) : 1993

अनुसूची

संशोधनों की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि

(4) (3).

31 अगस्त, 2009 1 अगस्त, 2009

31 अगस्त, 2009 2अगस्त, 2009

2. 1200 ( भाग 9 ) : 1973

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं।

[संदर्भ: सीईडी/राजपत्र| ए. के. सैनी , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' व प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी )

New Delhi , the 26th August , 2009

S.O. 2474. In pursuance of clause ( b ) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

Sl No. No. and year of the Indian Standards (1) (2)

1. 13826 (Part 4): 1993

SCHEDULE

No. and year of the Amendment

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

(4) (3)

31 August , 2009 I August, 2009

2. 1200 (Part 9): 1973

2August, 2009

31 August , 2009 5214

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] Copies of these amendments are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: CED/Gazette]

A. K. SAINI , Scientist ' F' and Head (Civil Engg.)

नई दिल्ली , 1 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2475.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये माानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया है/किये गये हैं :

अनुसूची

संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

संशोधनों की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि क्रम संख्या

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 1 .

31अगस्त, 2009 आई एस 13497 : 1992 विलीन एसिटिलीन गैस सिलिंडर के लिए संगलनीय प्लग विशिष्टि

संशोधन नं. 1

अगस्त, 2009

31 अगस्त , 2009 2. एस पी 9 : 1973 सिलिंडरों में वाहित गैसों की तकनीकी आंकड़ासीट

संशोधन नं. 2

अगस्त, 2009

इस संशोधन की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर, नागपुर, पटना , पूणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : एम. ई. डी/जी-2: 1 ]

सी. के. वेदा , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' व प्रमुख ( यांत्रिक इंजीनियरी )

New Delhi , the Ist September , 2009

S.O. 2475. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, thc Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards, particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

SI No. No. and year of the Indian Standards

No. and year of the Amendment

Date from which the amendment shall have effect (2)

(1 )

(3)

(4) 1.

31August , 2009 IS 13497 : 1992 Fusible plug for dissolved acetylene gas cylinder-Specification

Amendment No. I

August, 2009

31 August , 2009 SP 9 : 1973 Technical data sheet for gases conveyed in cylinders

Amendment No. 2

August, 2009

Copies of this standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi, Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch 5215

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Offices : Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram.

[Ref: MED/G-2: 1 ]

C. K. VEDA , Scientist ' F ' and Head ( Mechanical Engg .)

नई दिल्ली, 1 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2476.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिसे भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये हैं वे स्थापित हो गये हैं :-

अनुसूची

क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या वर्ष और शीर्षक

स्थापित तिथि संख्या

नए भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो, की

संख्या और वर्ष

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 1 .

30अप्रैल , 2009

आई एस 5616:1982 उत्थापक प्रयोजनों के लिए शार्ट लिंक चेन स्वीकार्यता की

आई एस/आई एसओ 1834 1999 ( आईएस 5616 : 1982 का अतिक्रमण ) उत्थापक प्रयोजनों के लिए शार्ट लिंक चेन-. स्वीकार्यता की सामान्य अपेक्षाएं

सामान्य अपेक्षाएं (पहला पुनरीक्षण )

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग, नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद, जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं।

[संदर्भ : एम. ई डी/जी-2 : 1 ]

सी. के. वेदा, वैज्ञा. एफ एवं प्रमुख ( यांत्रिक इंजीनियरिंग )

New Delhi , the 1st September , 2009

S.O.. 2476. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Dateof Sl . No. No. & Year of Indian Standards Established

Establishment

No. and Year of Indian Standards , if any , Supersededby the New Indian Standard

(1)

(3)

(4) Ι .

30April , 2009

IS 5616: 1982 Short link chain for lifting purposes general conditions of acceptance (FirstRevision)

IS/ISO 1834 : 1999 ( Superseding 1S 5616 : 1982) Short link chain for lifting purposes General conditions of acceptance

Copy of these Standards are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur, Patna , Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: MED/G -2: 11

C. K. VEDA , Scientist ' F ' and Head ( Mechanical Engg. ) 5216

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009 /BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

New Delhi , the 31st August , 2009 नई दिल्ली, 31 अगस्त 2009

S.O. 2477. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that is necessary in the public interest that for thetransport ofpetroleum from " Poda to Ponnamanda EPS " in the A. P. state pipeline should be laid by the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

का. आ. 2477.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर. ओ. यु. पाइप लाइन पि. ओ . डि. ऐ. से पोनामंडा ई. पी. एस. ( स्थानांतरण ) तक पेट्रोलियम के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए

And Whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed here to:

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों के बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिये एतद्‌द्याबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

Now Therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Aequisition of Right of Users in the land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein:

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

Any person interested in the said land - may object within 21 days from the date of this notification , to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd , Rajahmundry Asset/ K.G . , Basin, Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex , Rajahmundry , Andhra Pradesh .

SCHEDULE

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति , उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्राभाग राजामंन्द्रि एसट/ के. जी. बेसिन ओ. एन. जी. सी. गोदावारि भवन , राजामंन्द्रि , आंध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । Rou Pipe Line from Poda to Ponnamanda EPS ( Diversion )

State:

Mandal:

Razole

Andhra Pradesh

East Godavari

Ponnamanda

District:

Village:

और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

Hectares Ares Centi Ares Acres Cents

RS No.

अनुसूची

545/ 1A

545/ 1B3p

आर. ओ. यु. पाइप लाइन पि. ओ. डि. ऐ. से पोत्रामंडा ई. पी. एस. (स्थानांतरण)

542/2B

मंडल राजोल

राज्य

आन्ध्र प्रदेश

547/2A

052 गांव पोत्रामंडा

जिले पुर्वगोदावारि

112

542/ 1A

सेन्टेएर्स

हेकटएर्स एर्स

आर.एस.नं

एकड सेन्ट्स

518/P

0 06

545/ 1 ए

542/ IB

052

545/1 बी3पी

542/2ची

0 06

792

Total

547/2ए

0 02

052

[No. 12016/8/2009- ONGD- 111 ]

0 04

112

542/ 1 ए

R. S. SIKDAR, Under Secy.

518/पी

0 08

नई दिल्ली, 31 अगस्त, 2009

0 052

542/ 1 बी

0 79%

0 32

जोड़

[सं. 12016/8/2009/ ओएन जी डी-III ]

आर. एस . सिकदर , अवर सचिव

का. आ. 2478. - यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर ओ. यु. पाइप लाइन जी. एस #49 ऐ, सी. से के. वी. #7 तक पेट्रोलियम के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए । [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

5217

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों के बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिये एतद्द्याबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने के अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है :-

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति , उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग , राजामुन्द्रि एसट/ के. जी. बेसिन ओ. एन. जी. सी. गोदावारि भवन , राजामुन्द्रि, आंध्र प्रदेश को इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति यह भी कथन करेगा किक्या वह यह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत ।

अनुसूची

आर. ओ. यु. पाइप लाइन जी. एस #49 ऐ. सी. से के. वी. #7

6 0

08 911/1 जी

08 911/1 एच

07 911/1 आई

907/ 1 डी

0 02

05 0

911/1जे

0 911 / 1 के

0 02

ΟΙ

907/ 1ए

02 0

04 907/1 एच

0 01

04 898/1 एल

0 04

11 907/ 1 बी

0 0 04

0 907/1सी

11 0 01

0 907/1 एफ

04 : 0 03

07 905/3ए

04 898/ 1.बी

0 01

03 907/1 ई

04 907/1 जी

सकिनेटिपल्ली

राज्य

आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल

जिले

गांव अंतरवेदि पूर्वगोदावारि

सेन्टस हेक्टेएर्स एर्स

सेन्टेएर्स एकड आर.एस. नं

5 2

0 1046/2ची2पी 0 03

08 1046/1 बी4पी 0 02

06 0

0 1046/ 1 एपी

01 1047/1डीपी 0

1047/ 1 बी

0 0 05

1047/1सी

13 0 05

10471/डी

12 0

01 1047/2बी2

915/पी

0 0

914/पी

0 03

09 911 / 1ए

0 0 03

911/1 बी

0 0

911/1सी

04 0

911/ 1डी

0 0

911/1 ई

0 911/1 एफ

09 3175G1/09-7

0 894/ 1डी

03 0

0 894/2ए

001

907/1 आई

898/1 आर

03 0

0 894/2बी

0 0 03

906/ए

07 0

905/22

07 906/2

06 906/3

0 0 07

19 906/4

0 906/5

0 02

0 0

06 906/06

0 0 02

06 906/07

0 905/ 1ए।

05 0

0 905/12

0 01

0 905/2

905/3बी

0 01

898/ 1ए

898/ 1जे

05 5218

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/ BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) { 1

6 0 01

898/1 क्यू

03 901/2बी

894/2 ई

06 900/ 1 एफ

0 00

898/1 सो

0 01

04 901/2सी

03 898/1 डी

03 901/2डी

0 01

04 0

898/ 1 एन

901/2ई

0 01

894/1सी

895/ 1ए

06 898/ 1 ई

895/ 1 बी

09 0

898/ 1ओ

03 895/1सीपी

03 0.

893/4

895/1 सो पो 0

02 0

892/1

01 895/2एपी 0

01 898/1 एफ

04 895/2 ए पी

03 0 01

898/ 1 एच

03 895/2बी

0 02

05 898/1जी

00 03

03 895/2सी

0 0

09 01

898/1 आई

895/2डी

04 0

898/ 1 पी

03 895/2ई

06 5

892/2

0 04

895/3ए

10 0

898/1 के

894/1 ए

03 01

898/1 एम

03 894/1 बी

898/1एस 0

894/2डी

05 894/2सी

06 893/2

0 01

03 01

893/पी

893/3

03 893/1

2 43

जोड़:

00 06

898/2ए

[सं. 12016/8/2009/ओएन जी डी -111 ] 0

898/3 ए

आर. एस. सिकदर , अवर सचिव 0

900/1सी

New Delhi , the 31st August, 2009 898/3बी

0 02

0 01

898.6ए

0 02

898/8ए

900/1 बी

0 04

S. O. 2478 .-- Whereas it appears to the Central Governmentthat is necessary in the public interest that for thetransport of petroleum from " GS # 49AC to KV # 7 " in the A. P. State pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

0 02

898/10ए

898/12 पी

And Whereas, it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed here to:

900/1 ए

900/1डी

0 03

901 /2ए

900/1 ई

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of Users in the LandAct, 1962( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein:

5219

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ].

907/1C

907/1 F

905/3A Any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification , to laying the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority Oil &Natural Gas Corporation Ltd, Rajahmundry Asset/K.G. , Basin , Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex , Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh .

898/1B

SCHEDULE

907/1E ROU Pipe Line fromGS # 49 AC to KV # 7

907/1G

Mandal:

State: Andhra Pradesh

Sakhinetipalli

894/ 1D East Godavari

Antarvedi District:

Village

894/2A Hectares Ares Centi Ares Acres Cents R.S. No.

907/11 2

08 898/ 1R 1046/2B2p 0

1046/1B4p 0

894/2B

1046/ 1A5p 0

906/A1

1047/ 1Dp 0

905/2A2 0

1047/ IB

13.

906/A2

13 1047/ 1C

906/A3

12 1047/ID

906/A4

01 1047/2B2

906/A5

01 915/p

906/A6

04- 0

914/p

906 06/A7

09 0

911 / 1A

905/1 5/1 Al

911/ IB

905/15/ 1A2

911 / IC

905 /2A

04 0

911 / 1D

905/ 05/3B

911 / 1E

898/1 A 0

911/1 F

89898/13

08 911/IG

898/10 0

911 / IH

894/2E

07 911/11

898/ IC

907/1D

898/ 1D

08 0

911/ 1J

898/ 1N

911 / IK

894/ 1C 0

907 / 1A

02 898/ 1E 0

04 907 / 1H

898/10 0

898/ 1L

04 893/4

11 907/1B

892/1

11 0

07 0

03 0

04 0

03 0

04 0

03 0

06 0

07 0

06 02

19 0

06 0

05 0

05 02

04 01

03 01

06 02

04 0

06 0

03 0

00 5220

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] 1

895 /2A P

898/ 1F

03 0

898/ 1H

03 895/2B

05 0

898/1G

895 /2C

898/11

895/2D

898/ 1P

895 /2E

06 892/2

0 01

895/3A

10 0

898 / IK

894/ 1A

03 0

ΟΙ

898/ IM

894/ 1B

14 898/ IS

894/2D

894/2C

893/2

03 0

893/ 3/P

893/3

03 0

89 893/1

TOTAL:

898/2A

898/3A

[No. 12016/8/2009-ONGD - IIIJ R. S. SIKDAR, Under Secy .

900/IC

नई दिल्ली , 31 अगस्त, 2009

898/3B

898/6A

898/8A

900/ 1B

का. आ. 2479.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर. आ. यु. पाइप लाइन के. वि. डि. ई. से मोरी जी. सी. ऐस. ( स्थानांतरण ) तक पेट्रोलियम के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

898/ 10A

898/12 P

900/ 1A

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों के विछाने के प्रयोजन के लिये एतद्याबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

900/ 1D

901/2A

900/ IE

901/2B

900/ IF

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने के अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

901/2C

901/2D

901/2E

895/1A

895/ 1B

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति , उस भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी , तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्राभाग राजामुन्द्रि एसट/के. जी. बेसिन ओ . एन. जी. सी. गोदावरि भवन , राजामुन्द्रि, आंध्र प्रदेश इस अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा ।

895/1Cp

ΟΙ

895/ IC p

895 /2A P

और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या वह यह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से हो या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की मार्फत । 5221

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

अनुसूची

आर. ओ. यू. पाइप लाइन के. वि. डि. ई. से मोरी जी. सी. ऐस.

(स्थानातरण)

राज्य

सकिनेटिपल्ली आन्ध्र प्रदेश

मंडल

जिला

गांव अंतरवेदिकरा पूर्वगोदावारि

सेन्टेएर्स एकड सेन्टस आर.एस.नं हेकटएर्स एर्स

740/पी

10 0

0 0

0 739/5पी

0 788/पी

0 04

10 788/पी

0 0 05

12 0

789/पी

07 1/2

0 07 1/2 778/पी

613/पी

021/2

49 1/2 627/पी

0 20

0 625/पी

0 01

0 031/2

0 628/पी

0 24

601/2

73 1

जोड़

राज्य

सकिनेटिपल्ली

मंडल

आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला पूर्वगोदावारि

गांव केसावादासुपालेम

432/पी

सेन्टस

एकड हेकटएर्स एर्स

सेन्टेएर्स

आर.एस.नं

जोड़ 2

5 1

6 463/पी

1 462/पी

0 22

0 541/2 0

458/पी

0 521/2 446/पी

08 437/पी

0 0

41 435/पी

0 20

49 0

0 439/2पी

01 0

0 439/2पी

01 0

0 439/2पी

01 439/2पी

0 0

439/2पी

02 439/2पी

439/2पी

01 438/2पी

6 2

438/2पी

438/3पी

01 00

438/3पी

01 0

01 00

438/3पी

438/3 पी

436/2पी

01 00

아

436/2पी

0 00

01 0

436/2पी

01 00

436/2पी

01 00

0 00

434/2पी

01 00

434/3पी

0 00

434/3पी

0 03

08 0 07

432/2पी, 3पी

99 [सं. 12016/8/2009/ओएन जीडी-111 ]

आर. एस. सिकदर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 31st August , 2009

S.O. 2479. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from " KVDE ( KV # 9 ) to MORI GCS" in the A. P. State pipeline should be laid by the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

And Whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed hereto :

Nowtherefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of Users in the the Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Any person interested in the said land may object within21 days from the date of this notification , to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority, 5222

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/ BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) |

438/3p

01 Oil andNatural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/ K.G. , Basin , Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex , Rajahmundry , Andhra Pradesh .

SCHEDULE

438/3p

01 Rou Pipeline from KVDE (KV #9 ) to MORI GCS ( Diversion)

State:

438/3p

Andhra Pradesh

0 Mandal:

어

Sokhinetipalli

438/ 3p

0 District :

ΟΙ East Godavari

Antarvedikara

Village:

436/2p

0 R.S. No.

Ares

Hectares

Centi Ares Acres Cents

6 436/2p

0 0

740/p

436/2p

01 0

739/5p

436/2p

0 0

788/p

436/2p

0 0

01 788 /p

789/p

1 07 1/2

436/2p

01 0

778/p

0 071/2

436/2p

01 0

613/p

0 021/2

436/2p

01 20

627/p

0 491/2

434/2p

625/p

0 03 1/2

628/p

601/2

434/2p

01 Total

434/2p

434/3p

01 State: Andhra Pradesh Mandal:

Sakhinetipalli 434/3p

01 District: East Godavari

434/3p

Village:

01 Kesavadasupalem

RS No. Hectares

Ares

Centi Ares Acres

Cents 434/3p

05 1

434/3p

08 0

463/p

432/2p

18 0

462/ p

542

432/3p

458/p

0 522

432/p

13 0

446/p

437/p

Total

99 0

435/p

[No. 12016/8 /2009 -ONGD - 111 ] 0

439/2p

R. S. SIKDAR , Under Sccy.

439/2p

नई दिल्ली, 31 अगस्त, 2009

439/2p

이

का. आ. 2480.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर. ओ. यू. पाईपलाईन जि. एम. ऐ. सी. से जि. ऐ. ऐ तक पेट्रोलियम के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए । 0

438/2p

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों के बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिये एतदपाबद अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार आर्जित करना आवश्यक है । 5223

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदंत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमे उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने के अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजामन्द्रि एसट/ के. जी. बेसिन ओ. एन. जी. सी. गोदावरि भवन , राजामन्द्रि, आंध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा । और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की माफर्त ।

अनुसूची

आर. ओ. यु. पाइप लाईन जि. एम. ऐ. सी से जि. एम. ऐ. ऐ

मंडल

राज्य

आन्ध्र प्रदेश

उप्पालागुप्तम

गांव चल्लापाल्ली जिला पूर्वगोदावरि

सेन्टस हेक्टर्स एर्स

सेन्टेएर्स एकड आर.एस.नं.

0 749/2सी

0 05

121/2

0 121/2

749/2बीपी 0

0 05

749/2बी पी

0 750/2

121/2

08 751/1/1 बी 0 03

09 751/2/2बी 0

751/2-4

06 1/2

751/2-3

0 01

04 753/2जी

05 1/2

0 751/2-2

05 1/2

0 753/2एफ

0 0 02

05 753/2ई

0 02

753/2डी

07 753/2सी

0 05 1/2 0

751 /2-5

0 171/2 0

753/1 बी

0 08 1/2 753/2बी

0 03

0 59

1 47-1/2 जोड़:

[सं. 12016/8/2009-ओएन ज़ीडी- III ]

आर. एस. सिकदर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 31st August, 2009

S. O. 2480.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that is necessary in the public interest that for thetransport ofpetroleum from " GMAC to GMAA " in the A. P. State pipeline should be laide by the Oil & Natural GasCorporation Ltd.

And Whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed hereto:

NowTherefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of Users in the the Land Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification , to laying the pipeline under the land to the Competent Authority Oil &Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G. , Basin, Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex, Rajahmundry , Andhra Pradesh .

SCHEDULE

ROU PIPE LINE FROM GMAC to GMAΑ

Mandal:

State: Andhra Pradesh

Uppalaguptam East Godavari

District:

Challapalli

Village:

RSNo. Hectares Ares Centi Ares Aeres Cents 749/2C

0 12 1/2 0

0 749/2B P

12 1/2

13 0

749/2B P

0 750/2

121/2

0 0

08 751/1/ 1B

09 751/2/2B

751/2-4

0 .

06 1/2 751/2-3

104 753/2G

0 751/2-2

05 1/2 0

0 05 1/2 753/2F

0 753 /2E

0 753/2D

05 0

753/2C

07 0

0 751/2-5

05 1/2 0

0 753/1B

1712

753/2B

08 1/2 0

47 1/2 TOTAL:

[No. 12016/8 /2009 -ONGD - 111 ]

R. S. SIKDAR , Under Secy .

5224

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/ BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 31 अगस्त, 2009

422/14

0 06

0 03

422/15ए

422/17

422/16

0 03

08 का. आ. 2481.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर. ओ. यु. पाईप लाईन पोन्नामंडा # 3 से पोन्नामंडा # 2 तक पेट्रोलियम के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

422/ 13सी

0 01

422/19ए

588/ 1 बी

0 05

588/1 सी

और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनो के बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिये एतदपाबद अनुसुची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

588 / 1 डी

0 03

588/1 ई

588/ 1 एफ

588/2ए

588/1 जी

07 अतः अब पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन ( भुमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उसमें उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का अपना आशय एतद्वारा घोषित किया है ।

586/3

586/1

586/2

586/8

586/5

0 05

13 बशर्ते कि उक्त भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति, उस भूमि के नीचे पाइप लाइन बिछाने के लिए आक्षेप सक्षम प्राधिकारी तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग , निर्माण और देखभाल प्रभाग राजामन्द्रि एसट/ के. जी. बेसिन ओ. एन. जी. सी . गोदावरि भवन , राजामन्द्रि , आंध्र प्रदेश अधिसूचना की तारीख से 21 दिनों के भीतर कर सकेगा ।

586/6

586/7

586/8

05 और ऐसा आक्षेप करने वाला हर व्यक्ति यह भी कथन करेगा कि क्या यह वह चाहता है कि उसकी सुनवाई व्यक्तिगत रूप से या किसी विधि व्यवसायी की माफर्त ।

586/9

18 अनुसूची

620/2बी

0 00

01 आर. ओ. यु. पाइप लाइन पोन्नामंडा #3 से पोत्रामंडा #2

621/1 बी

586/10

राज्य

मंडल

आन्ध्र प्रदेश

राजोल

0 01

587/ 1 ए

02 जिला

गांव पोन्नामंडा

पूर्वगोदावारि

987/2ए

हेकटएर्स एर्स

आर.एस.नं

सेन्टेएर्स एकड सेन्टस

587/2बी

0 1

587/3ए

08 0 06

420/ 1ए2पी

620/3बी

420/ 1B

0 03

620/11 ए

420/2B

0 06

15 621/1 सी

619/2बी

420/2C

0 04

619/2सी

0 0

420/4ए

619/3बी

0 02

0 01

420/50

619/4बी

0 02

0 422/5

619/13ए

06 05

4022/6ए 0

638/2

14 422/8

0 01

जोड़:

422/9ए

422/12

422/13ए

[सं. 12016/8/2009/ओएन जीडी- III ] आर. एस. सिकदर , अवर सचिव 5225

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 31st August , 2009

422/16

422/13C

422/ 19A

S. O. 2481.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of petroleum from " Ponnamanda # 3 to Ponnamanda # 2" in the A. P. state pipeline should be laid by the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

588/1B

588/1C

588/1D

And Whereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed hereto:

588/ 1E

588/ 1F

588/2A

588/ IG

Now Therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of the Section. 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of Users in the landAct, 1962 (50 of 1962 ), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein:

586/3

586/1

586/2

0 . 02

586/8

Any person interested in the said land may object within 21 days from the date of this notification , to laying the pipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil andNatural Gas Corporation Ltd , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G . , Basin, Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh .

586/5

SCHEDULE

586/6

14 Rou Pipe Line from Ponnamanda #3 to Ponnamanda #2

586/7

586/8

Razole

Mandal:

State: Andhra Pradesh

586/9

18 East Godavari

Ponnamanda

District:

Village:

620/2B

Centi Ares Acres Cents

RS No. Hectares Ares

621/IB

06 3

586/10

02 420/ 1A, 2Pt 0

587/1A

987/2A

420/1B

587/2B

420/2B

587/3A

420/2C

620/3B

420/4A

620/ 11A

420/5A

621/10

422/5

619/2B

422/ 6A

619/20

422/8

619/3B

619/4B

422/9A

619/ 13A

422/12

638/2

422/ 13A

TOTAL :

422/14

[No. 12016 /8 /2009 - ONGD - III !

422/ 15A

R S. SIKDAR, Under Secy .

422/17

3175G1/09-8 5226

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3(ii ) ]

6 नई दिल्ली , 31 अगस्त, 2009

872

873

0 07

Total:

1 32

[सं. 12016/8/2009/ओएन जीडी- III ] का. आ. 2482.- यतः केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है किलोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में आर. ओ. यू. पाइपलाईन के. बि. डि. बि. से मोरी जि. सि. एस. तक पेट्रोलियम के लिये पाइप लाइन तेल तथा प्राकृतिक गैस आयोग द्वारा बिछाई जानी चाहिए ।

आर. एस. सिकदर, अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 31st August, 2009 और अतः यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी लाइनों के बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिये एतद्याबद अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करना आवश्यक है ।

S. O. 2482. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that is necessary in the public interest that for thetransport of petroleum from " KVDB to Mori GCS " in the A. P. state pipeline should be laid by the Oil & Natural GasCorporationLtd.

Andwhereas it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed hereto:

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of Users in the landAct, 1962(50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein:

Any person interested in the said land may object within21 days from the date of this notification , to laying thepipe line under the land to the Competent Authority Oil &Natural Gas Corporation Ltd , Rajahmundry Asset/K.G. , Basin, Godavari Bhavan , Base Complex , Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh .

SCHEDULE

अनुसूची

ROU Pipe Line from KVDB to MoriGCS

State: Andhra Pradesh Mandal: Sakhinctipalli आर. ओ. यु. पाइप लाईन के. बि. डि. बि से मोरी जि. सि. एस

East Godavari

Antarvedi

District:

Village:

आन्ध्र प्रदेश

सकिनेटिपल्लि

राज्य

मंडल

Čenti Ares Acres Cents

RS No. Hectares Ares

जिला

गांव अंतरवेदी

पूर्वगोदावरि

716/P

856/2P

सेन्ट

आर.एस.नं हेकटेयर्स एर्स

सेन्टेयर्स एकड

857/2p

858/P

30 0

716/पी

864/P

0 856/2पी

865/P

857/2पी

0 03

857/ IP

871

858/पी

872

54 12

864/पी

873

865/पी

Total:

857/1 पी

[No. 12016/8/2009 -ONGD- III ] 0

871

R. S. SIKDAR, Under Secy .

5227 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 8 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2483.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में वाडीनार से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में बीना तक कूड ऑयल के परिवहन हेतु भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन विछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री एस. के. ब्रह्मभट्ट, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, वाडीनार बीना क्रूड ऑयल पाइपलाइन परियोजना, भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड, 23-24; पहेली मंझिल, "प्रमुख स्वामी आर्केड , मालवीया चोक, राजकोट 360 001 (गुजरात) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला: राजकोट

तहसील : टंकारा

राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टेयर में

क्र.

गांव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

1 .

नेकनाम

00.1740

498

00.0980

497/1

558/1

00.1092

562

00.1370

561/1.

00.1700

00.0491

561/1

643

00.1706 5228

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009 /BHADRA 21. 1931

[Part II- Sec . 3 (ii ) ] क्र.

गांव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टेयर में

हमीरपर

6/1

00.0675

71/1

00.0340

106

00.4230

108

00.0675

छत्तर

197/4

00.3068

187/ पैकी

00.0460

204/1

00.0754

204/2

00.0248

204/3

00.2072

204/5

00.0600

217

00.2750

[फा. सं. आर-31015/32/2009- ओ.आर.- II ]

ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas

NewDelhi , the 8th September, 2009

S. O. 2483.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in thepublic interest that for transportation of crude oil from Vadinar in the State of Gujarat to Bina in the state of Madhya Pradesh , a pipeline should be laid by Bharat Oman Refineries Limited;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein ;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty One days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this 5229 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

Notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri S. K. Brahmbhatt, Competent Authority, Vadinar-Bina Crude Oil Pipeline Project , Bharat Oman Refineries Limited , 23-24 , Wing -B , 1ST Floor,, Pramukh Swami Arcade, Malaviya Chowk , Rajkot360 001. (Gujarat)

SCHEDULE

STATE : GUJARAT TEHSIL : TANKARA

DISTRICT : RAJKOT

S. No.

Area in Hectare

SurveyNo.

Nameof Village

00.1740

1 .

Neknam

498

497/1

00.0980

558/1

00.1092

562

00.1370

561/1

00:1700

561/1

00.0491

643

00.1706

6/1

00.0675

Hamirpar

71/1 .

00.0340

106

00.4230

108

00.0675

Chhattar

197/4

00.3068

187 / Paiki

00.0460

204/1

00.0754

204/2

00.0248

204/3

00.2072

204/5

00.0600

217

00.2750

[F. No. R-31015/32/2009- O.R. - II ]

A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy 5230

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[Part II-Sec . 3( ii )]

नई दिल्ली, 8 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2484.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में वाडीनार से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में बीना तक कूड ऑयल के परिवहन हेतु भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन विछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है,. उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशयं की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियों साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री एस. के. ब्रह्मभट्ट, सक्षम प्राधिकारी , वाडीनार बीना क्रूड ऑयल पाइपलाइन परियोजना, भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड, 23-24; पहेली मंझिल , "प्रमुख स्वामी आर्केड , मालवीया चोक, राजकोट 360 001 (गुजरात) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

तहसील : घोल

जिला: जामनगर

राज्य : गुजरात

क्र.

गांव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टेयर में

रोझीया

78पैकी

00.1800

128

00.0485

137/2

00.0800

136

00.1380

132

00.1700

133/2

00.1770

133

00.1700

लैयाला

00.0615

152

237

00.0646

[फा. सं. आर -31015/34/2009- ओ.आर. - 11 ]

ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव 5231

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 8th September, 2009

S. O. 2484.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for transportation of crude oil from Vadinar in the State of Gujarat to Bina in the state of Madhya Pradesh , a pipeline should be laid by Bharat Oman Refineries Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto; Now, therefore, in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein ;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty One days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this Notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri S. K. Brahmbhatt, Competent Authority, Vadinar- Bina Crude Oil Pipeline Project, Bharat Oman Refineries Limited , 23-24 , Wing -B , 1ST Floor ,, Pramukh Swami Arcade , Malaviya Chowk, Rajkot 360 001. (Gujarat)

SCHEDULE

TEHSIL : DHROL

DISTRICT : JAMNAGAR

STATE : GUJARAT S. No.

Area in Hectare Nameof Village

SurveyNo.

78Paiki

00.1800

Rojhiya

128

00.0485

137/2

00.0800

136

00.1380

132

00.1700

133/2

00.1770

133

00.1700 2.

152

Laiyala

00.0615

237

00.0646

[ F. No. R -31015/34/2009- O.R. - II ] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy 5232

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[ Part 11-Sec . 3 ( ii )|

नई दिल्ली, 8 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2485.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में वाडीनार से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में बीना तक कूड ऑयल के परिवहन हेतु भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के 'प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन विछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री. एस. के. ब्रह्मभट्ट, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, वाडीनार बीना क्रूड ऑयल पाइपलाइन परियोजना , भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड, 14 , 14 - A कृष्णा बंग्लोज़, प्रहलादनगर, अहमदाबाद 380051 ( गुजरात) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

तहसील : ठासरा

जिला: खेझ

राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टेयर में गांव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्र.

00.3523

सीमलज

156 रेकी

3

00.0215

1099

आगरवा

724

00.0016

635/1

00.0127

00.4400

उपलेट

[फा. सं. आर -31015/33/2009- ओ.आर.- II ]

ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव 19311T3SAD BHT

5233 भारत का राजपत्र सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भ 21

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

New Delhi, the 8th September, 2009

S. O. 2485.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for transportation of crude oil from Vadinar in the State of Gujarat to Bina in the state of Madhya Pradesh , a pipeline should be laid by Bharat Oman Refineries Limited;

Now, therefore , ih exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein ;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty One days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this Notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri S.K. Brahmbhatt , Competent Authority, Vadinar - Bina Crude Oil Pipeline Project, Bharat Oman Refineries Limited, 14 & 14- A Krishna Bungalow, Near Prahladnagar, 8 /h . V.S.NL Bldg. , Ahmedabad -380 051 ( Gujarat) .

SCHEDULE

STATE : GUJARAT

DISTRICT : KHEDA

TEHSIL : THASRA

Area in Hectare S. No.

Nameof Village

SurveyNo.

00.3523

156P

Simlaj .

00.0215

1099

Agarwa

724

00.0016

00.0127

635/1

00.4400

Uplet

[F. No. R-31015/33/2009- O.R. - II ] " A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy 3175 G1/09-9 5234

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

Part II-Sec. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 9 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2486.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में वाडीनार से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में बीना तक कूड ऑयल के परिवहन हेतु भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन विछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में श्री एस. के. ब्रह्मभट्ट, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, वाडीनार बीना क्रूड ऑयल पाइपलाइन परियोजना, भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड, 23-24; पहेली मंझिल, "प्रमुख स्वामी आर्केड , मालवीया चोक, राजकोट 360001 (गुजरात) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । 5235 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भांद्र 21 , 1931

अनुसूची

तहसील : वांकानेर

जिला : राजकोट

राज्य: गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टेयर में

क्र.

गांव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

कोटडा नायाणी

541/1

00.2385

00.3125

674/9

00.2950

674/10

00.2200

674/5

674/20

00.1250

पीपलीयाराज

60/2

00.1472

717/1 पैकी

00.2400

733/12

00.6060

प्रतापगढ

76/3

00.2000

80/2पैकी

00.3050

सींधावदर

73/1

00.1041

73/2

00.0308

77/1 पैकी

00.0135

615/ पैकी

00.1136

615/ पैकी

00.1155

676

00.2010

4/2पैकी

00.2100

36/2

भोजपरा

00.3617

राजावडला

00.0177

249/1

251/4

00.1132

80/1

00.1713

77/2 पैकी

00.0930

00.0342

56/ पैकी

लालपर

90/2

00.0636

केराला

108/3

00.0822 5236

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[Part II-Sec . 3(ii ) ] क्र.

गांव का नाम

सर्व नंबर

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टेयर में 1

उसीकगढ

123/1

00.1934

122/4

00.0914

10.

00.0527

83/ पैकी

00.0117

33/2पैकी

00.0300

11.

दलडी

283/1 पैकी

00.2055

[फा. सं. आर-31015/36/2009-ओ.आर.- 11 ]

ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th September, 2009

S. O. 2486. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for transportation of crude oil from Vadinar in the State of Gujarat to Bina in the state of Madhya Pradesh , a pipeline should be laid by Bharat Oman Refineries Limited;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the power conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein; 0012.00

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty One days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this Notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri S. K. Brahmbhatt , Competent Authority, Vadinar - Bina Crude Oil Pipeline Project , Bharat Oman Refineries Limited , 23-24, Wing -B , 1ST Floor ,, Pramukh Swami Arcade , Malaviya Chowk , Rajkot - 360 001 (Gujarat )

528000 5237

READ T

भारत का राजपत्र सितम्बर 12 2009/ 23, 1934 10

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ).]

epelliy to arms

SCHEDULE

STATE : GUJARATE

Hospice

DISTRICT : RAJKOT

TEHSIL : WANKANER

Area In Hectare S. No.

Nameof Village

SurveyNo.

541/1

00.2385

Kotda.Nayani

00.3125

674/9

674/10

00.2950

674/5

00.2200

674/20

00.1250

00.1472.

Pipaliyaraj 100% 30160/2

00.2400

717/1 Paiki

00.6060

733/12

00.2000

76/3

Pratapgadh

80/2Paiki

00.3050

Paiki080135

77/1

08.0135

00.1136,

615/ Paiki

00.1155

Paiki

1695(1003

00.2010

00.2100

4/2Paiki

Bhojpara

Rajavadla ?????

35k

???????????? ???????

44409093છyg

00.1743

80/1

00.0930

77/2 Paiki

00.0342

56/ Paiki

Lalpar

00.0636

Kerela

90/2

108/3

00.0822 5238

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[Part II- Sec . 3 ( ii)] S. No.

NameofVillage

Area in Hectare

SurveyNo.

9 .

123/1

00.1934

Rasikgadh

122/4

00.0914

10.

Paj

00.0527

83/ Paiki

00.0117

33/2 Paiki

00.0300

11.

Daldi

283/1 Paiki

00.2055

[F. No. R-31015/36/2009- O.R. -II ] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy

नई दिल्ली, 9 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2487.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में वाडीनार से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में बीना तक कूड ऑयल के परिवहन हेतु भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

5239

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

अनुसूची

जिला: जामनगर

तहसील: लालपुर

राज्य : गुजरात क्र.

गांव का नाम

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टेयर में 1

137/2

सींगच

00.0463

137/3

00.0755

283पैकी

00.3600

जांखर

502पैकी 1

00.0225

146

00.2242

145

00.1631

77/1 पैकी

00.4950

[फा. सं. आर-31015/30/2009 - ओ.आर.- II ]

ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th September, 2009

S. O. 2487.- Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for transportation of crude oil from Vadinar in the State of Gujarat to Bina in the state of Madhya Pradesh , a pipeline should be laid by Bharat Oman Refineries Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto; Now, therefore, in exercise of the power conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein;

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty One days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this Notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri $ . K. Brahmbhatt , Competent Authority, Vadinar- Bina Crude Oil Pipeline Project, Bharat Oman Refineries Limited, 23-24 , Wing-B , 1St Floor,, Pramukh Swami Arcade , Malaviya Chowk , Rajkot 360 001. (Gujarat ) 5240

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA SEPTEMBER 12, 2009ABHADRA 21 , 1931

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii)]

SCHEDULE

TEHSIL: LALPUR

DISTRICT : JAMNAGAR

STATE :GUJARAT S. No.

Area in Hectare Nameof Village

SurveyNo.

137/2

Singach

00:0463

137/3

00.0755

283 Paiki

00.3600

Jankhar

502Paiki 1

00.0225

146

00.2242

145

00.1631

77/1 Paiki

00.4950

[F. No. R-31015/30/2009- O.R. -II ] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy

नई दिल्ली. 9 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2488.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोक हित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पंजाब राज्य में रमन मंडी से हरियाणा राज्य में बहादुरगढ़ तक, पेट्रोलियम तेल के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा ' जी जी एस आर उत्पाद निष्क्रमण परियोजना के कार्यान्वयन हेतु एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उक्त भूमि में, जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में वर्णित है और जिसमें पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उक्त भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई भी व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के संबंध में श्री प्रहलाद सिंह , (हस्यिाणा) , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरी उत्पाद निष्कमण परियोजना , एस सी एफनं.- 29, सेक्टर -6, वहादुसाद - 124507, हरियाणा को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा 5241 भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

अनुसूची

राज्य: हरियाणा

जिला : रोहतक

तहसील : महम

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा/किला

गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

संख्या

मुस्ततिल संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

(7)

(5)

(4)

(6)

(3)

(2)

(1)

233

1. चान्दी

25/2

224

229

228

18/1

18/2

57.

18/3

23/1

3175 GI/09-10 5242

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009 /BHADRA 21 , 1931

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5) (6) (7)

227

252

251

[फा. सं. आर-31015/6/2009-ओ.आर.- II]

ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th September, 2009

S. O. 2488.- Whereas , it appears to the Central Govemment , that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products from Raman Mandi in the State of Punjab to Bahadurgarh in the State of Haryana for implementation of " GGSR Products Evacuation Project pipeline from Raman Mandi to Bahadurgarh " , should be laid by the HindustanPetroleum Corporation Limited;

And, whereas , it appears to the Central Govemment that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid , and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Govemment hereby declares its intention to acquire the Right of User therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may , within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the Right of User therein or laying of the pipeline under the land , to shri Prahlad Singh , Competent Authority ( Haryana ), Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Guru Gobind Singh Refinery Product Evacuation Project SCF No. - 29 , Sector - 6 Market, Bahadurgarh - 124507 , Haryana .

5243 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : MAHAM

District : ROHTAK

State: HARYANA

Area

Name of Village

Hadbast No.

Mustatii No.

Khasra/ Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5) (6) (7)

1. CHANDI

233

25/2

224

229

228

18/1

18/2

18/3

23/1

13 5244

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[Part II -Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5) (6) (7)

227

252

251

[F. No. R-31015/6/2009- O.R. -II ] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy

नई दिल्ली, 9 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2489.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय के का.आ. 1180 दिनांक 28.04.09, द्वारा पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे उसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा जायेगा) की धारा 3 (1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचना प्रकाशित कर, रमन मंडी (पंजाब राज्य में) से बहादुरगढ़ (हरियाणा राज्य में) तक, पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड़ द्वारा "जी जी एस आर उत्पाद निष्क्रमण परियोजना रमन मंडी से बहादुरगढ़ पेट्रोलियम पाइपलाइन" के सम्बन्ध में उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में निर्दिष्ट तहसील महम जिला रोहतक राज्य हरियाणा की भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी,

और, उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को दिनांक 26.06.2009 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी , और, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का विनिश्चय किया है ।

अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुये घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाता है ।

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुये यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड़ में निहित होगा । 5245 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

अनुसूची

तहसील : महम

राज्य: हरियाणा

जिला : रोहतक

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा/ किला

गाँव का नाम

हेक्टेयर

वर्गमीटर

एयर

हदबस्त संख्या

संख्या

मुस्ततिल संख्या

(1)

(2)

(7)

(3)

(4)

(5) (6)

113

1. फरमाना खास

08.

18/1

18/2

19/1

2/2

8/1

08 5246

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931 (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

19/1

19/2

00 [Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii)] (6) (7) 00

25 01

50 00

13 11

89 01

26 00

75 11

63 12

65 01

01 01

01 11

63 11

63 00

50 00

50 09

61 11

89 01

77 02

27 13

66 11

13 00

50 01

26 05

51 01

15 08

09 12

39 00

25 13

66 10

87 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

(5)

(2)

(3)

(4)

6/3

14/1

14/2

19/1

23/1

23/2

10/1

5/1

5/2

416

457

5247 (6) (7) 00

25 00

25 10

37 13

53 02

25 02

67 14

25 02

27 01

26 14

67 01

77 13

66 00

25 05

81 08

85 11

38 00

25 01

42 14

54 00

13 00

12 13

66 06

12 10

90 04

30 07

08 01

01 21

50 02

02 5248

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

(2)

(1)

(5)

(3)

(4)

458

459

1553

1555

1559

1563

1564

1565

1566

1567

1570

112

8/2

00 2. फरमाना बादशाहपुर

14/3

18/1

8/1

14/1.

14/2

15/1

15/2

19 [Part II-Sec . 3( ii ) } (6) (7) 02

78 03

54 00

50 00

77 01

01 00

75 00

75 01

51 00

75 01

51 00

25 14

42 04

36 09

25 00

31 13

66 01

26 01

01 13

91 05

13 11

36 00

25 04

30 12

90 00

25 00

25 02

02 06

07 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

4/1

4/2

7/1

119

592

111

3. गुगाहेडी

9/1

9/2

10/1

10/2

12/1

14 3175 G1/09--11

5249

(6) (7) (5)

40 00

60 00

32 00

59 00

03 00

87 00

34 00

08 00

79 00

42 00

01 00

53 00

86 00

34 00

80 00

00 5250

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931 (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

25/1

22/3

23/1

21/1

21/2

23/1

24/1

24/2

17/1

17/2

20/1

20/2

23/1

24/1/1

रास्ता

16/1

16/2/2 [Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii) ] (6) (7) 14

67 04

30 00

25 03

28 10

87 01

86 09

25 12

65 12

14 04

55 10

12 02

53 12

65 12

65 05

31 05

31 12

65 00

25 00

25 03

28 08

09 12

65 06

81 05

26 06

32 00

62 10

25 06

57 06 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(5)

(2)

(4) (1)

(3)

17/1

11/2

13/2

15/1

15/2

17/1

18/1

1/1

1/2

4/1

4/2

7/1

7/2/1

7/2/2

15/2

4/1

4/2

5/1/1

5/1/2

2/1

2/2

5251

(7) (6)

65 12

91 13

84 07

13 11

26 12

61 09

83 06

26 01

83 06

75 00

07 06

65 12

06 05

50 04

30 00

25 03

28 05

56 12

90 12

39. 12

39 12

39 11

63 00

50 00

50 10

63 11

36 09 5252

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

3/1

3/2

4/1

4/2

192

196

197/2

587

588

589

598

600

602

603

604

620

681

110

23 4. खरक जाटान

[Part 11-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ]

(6)

(5)

(7) 00

39 00

39. 00

03 00

87 00

51 00

39 00

25 00

77 00

50 00

26 00

50 00

81 00

50 00

79 00

02 00

50 00

01 00

32 00

54 00

25 00

38 00

78 00

65 00

36 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

19/1

19/2

21/1

21/2

21/3

22/1

17/1

17/2

2/1

2/2

रास्ता

14/1

5253

(7) (6)

25 00

40 13

31 05

26 01

02 02

68 15

51 01

85 08

50 00

03 03

25 00

84 07

50 00

66 13.

08 07

02 02

92 14

53 02

10 09

28 03

36 09

25 00

08 07

38 11

78 02

83 06

10 09

77 01

08 07

85 08

53 02

25 00

01 01 5254

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009 /BHADRA 21 , 1931 (1)

(2)

(3)

(4) (5)

14/2

16/1

16/2

17/1

17/2

00 [Part II-Sec. 3 (ii ) ] (6) (7) 11

63 05

31 12

65 04

80 12

65 05

31 03

54 14

67 01

51 12

65 05

31 05

31 12

14 12

65 04

55 12

65 00

43 15.

26 00

25 13

66 01

01 00

50 15

68 00

50 04

80 11

13 01

51 00

25 01

77 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(5)

(4)

(2)

(3)

(1)

20/2

100

101

223

253

264

279

295

864

873

877

882

887

899

960

109

00 5. बैन्सी

22/1

24/1

24/2

25/1

25/2

5255 (6) (7) 00

25 14

92 00

02 02

13 11

40 11

25 00

28 14

42 10

87 13

40 13

30 04

27 02

77 04

50 00

25 00

01 01

50 00

50 02

01 01

51 01

01 05

81 12

14 06

83 12

56 05

57 00

77 01 5256

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21. 1931

(5)

(4)

(2)

(1)

(3)

14/1

14/2

5/1

5/2

1/1

1/2

2/1

2/2

2/3

9/1

9/2/1

9/2/2

13/1/1

13/1/2 00

13/2/1

13/2/2

14/1

14/2

15/2

12/2

18/1

19/1

00 [Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii) ]

(7) (6)

81 05

62 10

26 00

25 01

77 07

78 02

27 02

25 00

62 01

01 00

50 02

07 06

25 00

13 00

25 09

86 12

86 09

53 06

77 01

37 10

04 04

25 00

25 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931 (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

19/1

19/2

310

316

1018

1055

1056

1120

1166

1175

1177

194

6. लाखन माजरा

16/1

195

16/2

17 7. खरेन्टी

3/2

1/1

1/2 3175 G1/09-12

5257 (5) (6) (7) 00

92 00

60 00

79 00

39 00

62 00

01 00

50 00

81 00

27 00

50 00

01 00

25 00

83 00

30 00

85 00

84 00

90 00

60 00

25 00

04 00

15 00

89 00

26 00

50 5258

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21. 1931 (1)

(4)

(5)

(3)

10/1

16/1

16/2

1/1

2/1

3/1

3/2

5/1

5/2

5/3

8/2/2

9/1

9/2

00 [Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii)] (6) (7)

78 02

14 12

50 10

66 13

81 05

03 03

25 00

07 06

39 12

65 06

65 12

85 08

25 04

04 12

63 11

01 12

14 01

77 00

75 00

63 11

01 01

13 11

63 11 -5259

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009 / भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

(6) (7)

(2)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(1)

21/1

21/2

20/1

20/2

2/1

2/2

4/1

250 62

7/2

03 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931 5260

(4)

(5)

(3)

(2)

13/1

15/1

15/2

23/1

24/1

24/2

25/1

25/2

5/1

5/2

258

274

275

299

303

306

316

317

318

664

677

678

683

684

685 [Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii )]

(7) (6)

65 12

25 00

87 10

53 02

62 10

28 03

30 04

84 07

85 08

15 13

25 00

30 04

25 00

60 08

61 09

53 02

78 02

51 01

26. 01

50 01

25 00

26 01

01 01

75 00

50 00 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(4)

(3)

(1)

(2)

690

748

749

160

5 8. चान्दी

161

17/1/1

17/1/2/1

17/1/2/2

17/2

17/3

162

22/1

23/1

23/2

182

22/1

रास्ता

5261

(6) (7) (5)

01 00

25 00

57 00

14 00

75 00

25 00

30 00

01 00

89 00

75 00

10 00

13 00

63 00

01 00

77 00

25 00

77 00

87 00

51 00

61 00

15 00

02 5262

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

(3)

(2)

(5)

(4)

183

13/1

13/2/2

14/2

18/1/1

18/1/2

18/2

184

6/1

6/2

8/1

8/2

14/1

185

193

00.

4/1

4/2

194

00 [Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ) (6) (7) 12.

65 12

65 04

04 04

25 00

14 12

79 03

25 00

62 10

26 01

25 00

31 05

09 11

63 02

27 00

25 09

61 00

25 06

07 12

65 12

90 00

34 08

79 09

03 03

75 00

38 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(5)

(1)

194

1:5

196

ជន

206

22 2

15/1

15/2

16M

16/2

$00

222

रास्ता

00.

223

10/1

10/2

12/1

122

13/2

19/1

25/1

5263 (6) (7) 11

13 10

42 14

53 06

07 09

86 07

08 08

34 07

59 09

31 05

12 06

32 08

60 07

57 90

10 60

60 80

07 90

34 80

26 09

336 04

30 00

50 03

38 11

$50 00

25 00.

02 LL.

80.

109

55 04

03 12

90 10

87 00

25 5264

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009 /BHADRA 21 , 1931

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] 1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5) (6)

(7)

376

223

381

400

429

432

480

497

506

915

933

938

965

[फा. सं. आर-31015/6/2009-ओ.आर. - 11]

ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th September, 2009

S. O. 2489. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , published in the Gazette of India vide number S.O. 1180 dated the 28th April 2009, issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Products from Raman Mandi in the State of Punjab to Bahadurgarh in the State of Haryana by the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited for implementing the "GGSR Products Evacuation Project pipeline from Raman Mandi to Bahadurgarh " in Tehsil Maham , District Rohtak, in Haryana State;

Andwhereas, copies of the said gazette notification were made available to the public on 26.06.2009.

And whereas , the Competent Authority has under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act , has submitted his report to the Central Government.

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is acquired;

And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of users in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest from the date of publication of this declaration , in the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .

5265 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : MAHAM

District : ROHTAK

State: HARYANA

Area

Name of Village

Hadbast No.

Mustatil No.

Khasra / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre

(3)

(5)

(7) (1)

(2)

(4)

(6)

113

1. FARMANA KHAS

18/1

18/2

19/1

2/2

8/1

3175 G1/09--13 5266

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21. 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

19/1

19/2

00 [Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ]

(7) (6)

25 01

01 00

50 11

13 11.

89 01

75 00

63 12

65 01

01 01

63 11

63 00

50 00

61 09

89 01

77 02

27 13

66 11

13 00

50 01

26 05

56 01

51 13

15 08

09 12

39 00

66 13

87 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931 (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

6/3

14/1

14/2

19/1

23/1

23/2

10/1

5/1

5/2

416

457

5267 (6) (7)

02 5268

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21. 1931 (1)

(4) (5)

(2)

(3)

458

459

1553

1555

1559

1563

1564

1565

1566

1567

1570

112

8/2

2. FARMANA BADSHAPUR

14/3

18/1

8/1

14/1

14/2

15/1

15/2

00 [Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii) ]

(7) (6)

78 03

54 00

75 00

50 01

77 01

01 00

75 00

75 01

51 00

75 01

51 00

25 14

30 04

62 10

25 00

31 13

66 01

01 01

91 05

13 11

36 09

25 00

30 04

90 12

25 00

02 02

07 06 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

4/1

4/2

7/1

119

592 3. GUGAHERI

111

9/1

9/2

10/1

10/2

12/1

5269 (5) (6) (7) 00

40 00

60 00

62 00

30 00

32 00

59 00

01 00

42 00

01 00

03 00

87 00

34 00

25 00

14 00

08 00

79 00

42 00

01 00

53 00

77 00

51 00

34 00

53 00

02 00

39 00

80 00

01 00

25 00

14 00

34 5270

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5) (1)

25/1

22/3

23/1

21/1

21/2

23/1

24/1

24/2

17/1

17/2

20/1

20/2

23/1

24/1/1

CartTrack

16/1

16/2/2

00 [Part II--Sec. 3 (ii)]

(7) (6)

67 14

30 04

25 03

87 10

01 01

86 00

25 12

65 12

14 04

-55 10

12 02

53 12

65 12

65 05

31 05

31 12

65 00

25 00

25 03

28 08

65 12

07 06

81 01

26 06

32 00

50 10

25 00

57 06 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

5271

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5) (6) (7)

17/1

00 07

11/2

13/2

15/1

15/2

17/1

18/1

1/1

1/2

4/1

4/2

7/1

7/2/1

7/2/2

15/2

4/1

4/2

5/1/1

5/1/2

2/1

2/2

36 5272

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009 /BHADRA 21 , 1931

(2)

(3)

(1)

(4)

3/1

3/2

4/1

4/2

192

196

197/2

587

588

589

598

600

602

603

604

620

681

110

4. KHARAK JATAN

(6) (7) (5)

39 00

03 00

00 .

25 00

55 00

51 00

50 00

81 00

50 00

54 00

38 00

65 00

36 00

09 [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931 .

(2)

(4)

(3)

(5)

19/1

19/2

21/1

21/2

21/3

22/1

17/1

17/2

2/2

CartTrack

14/1

00 3175 GI/09-14

5273 (6) (7) 00

25 13

40 05

31 01

02 02

68 01

85 08

50 03

25 00

84 00

50 13

66 07

02 02

92 02

10 09

28 03

36 00

25 07

08 11

38 02

78 06

83 09

77 01

08 08

85 02

53 00

01 01 5274

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931 (1)

(2)

(3)

(4) (5)

14/2

16/1

16/2

17/1

17/2

00 [Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] (6) (7) 11

63 05

31 12

65 04

80 12

65 05

31 03

54 14

67 01

51 12

65 05

31 05

31 12

14 12

55 04

65 00

25 15

43 01

26 00

25 13

66 01

50 00

68 00

50 04

80 11

13 01

51 00

25 01

77 [ भाग II- खण्ड-3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

(2)

(3)

(4) (5)

20/2

100

101

223

253

264

279

295

864

873

877

882

887

899

960

00 5. BAINSI

109

22/1

24/1

24/2

25/1

25/2

5275 (6) (7) 00

25 14

92 00

25 02

02 11

13 13

40 11

89 00

25 03

28 14

42 10

87 13

40 13

40 04

30 02

27 01

77 04

80 00

50 00

25 01

01 00

50 00

50 02

27 01

01 01

51 01

01 05

81 12

14 06

83 12

90 05

56 06

57 00

25 01

77 5276

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

(2)

(1)

(5)

(3)

(4)

14/1

14/2

5/1

5/2

1/1

1/2

2/1

2/2

2/3

9/1

9/2/1

9/2/2

13/1/1

13/1/2

13/2/1

13/2/2

14/1

14/2

15/2

12/2

18/1

19/1

00 [Part II-Sec . 3( ii )] (6) (7)

07 06

05.

26 01

62 10

26 00

77 01

08 02

78 10

12 02

78 05

81 02

27 00

62 10

01 00

50 02

27 06

07 00

25 00

12 00

13 00

86 09

39 09

86 02

53 06

83 01

77 10

37 07

08 04

04 00

25 00

25 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

(4)

(2)

(3)

19/1

19/2

310

316

1018

1055

1056

1120

1166

1175

1177

20 6. LAKHAN MAJRA

194

16/1

195

16/2

25 7. KHAREANTI

3/2

1/1

1/2

5277 (5) (6) (7)

92 00

60 00

62 00

03 00

01 00

50 00

81 00

27 00

50 00

83 00.

85 00

25 00

15 00

89 00

50 00

00 5278

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931 (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

10/1

16/1

16/2

1/1

2/1

3/1

3/2

5/1

5/2

5/3

8/2/2

9/1

9/2

10 [Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] (6) (7) 02

78 11

14 12

50 10

87 13

81 05

06 03

03 00

07 06

39 12

65 06

65 12

85 08

04 04

65 12

01 01

77 01

75 00

25 11

63 01

01 01

01 00

50 11

13 11

63 [भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

5279

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5) (6) (7)

21/1

21/2

20/1

20/2

25.

22.

2/1

00.

2/2

12.

80.

4/1

7/2

03 5280

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009 /BHADRA 21 , 1931 ,

(5)

(2)

(3)

(4)

13/1

15/1

15/2

23/1

24/1

24/2

25/1

25/2

5/1

5/2

258

274

275

299

303

306

316

317

318

664

677

678

683

684

685

00 [Part I Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] (6) (7) 12

62 10

25 00

25 10

87 02

53-

62 10

28 04

30 12

65 07

84 08

85 13

25 00

25 08

61 09

53 02

78 01

51 00

26 01

50 01

25 00

26 01

01 00

75 00

50 00

50 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

5281

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ 21, 1931

(2)

(3)

(5) (6) (7) (1)

690

748

749

25 8.CHANDI

160

161

17/1/1

17/1/2/1

17/1/2/2 00

17/2

17/3

162

22/1

23/1

23/2

182

20.

22/1

CartTrack 00

02 3175G1/09-15.

5282

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12. 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

(5)

(3)

(1)

(4)

(2)

183

13/1

13/2/2

14/2

18/1/1

18/1/2

18/2

184

6/1

6/2

8/1

8/2

14/1

185

193

4/1

4/2

194

00 [Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] (6) (7) 12

65 12

04 04

80 04

25 12

14 12

14 03

79 00

25 00

62 10

77 01

25 00

90 05

09 08

63 02

27 00

61 09

25 00

65 12

90 00

34 08

61 09

03 00

38 11 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

(3)

(2)

(4)

(5)

194

195

205

.20

206

15/1

15/2

16/1

16/2

222

CartTrack 00

223

10/1

10/2

5283 (6) (7) 11

13 10

37 14

42 02

53 06

07 09

86 07

08 08

34 07

59 09

10 05

31 10

12 06

32 08

09 07

84 06

57 09

10 08

60 06

07 00

25 08

34 01

26 09

36 04

30 00

50 03

54 11

38 11

38 00

50 00

25 00

25 02

27 5284

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4) (5) (6) (7)

223

12/1

12/2

13/2

19/1

25/1

376

381

400

429

432

01.

480

497

506

915

933

938

965

[F.No. R-31015/6/2009- O.R. - II ]

A. GOSWAMI , UnderSecy

नई दिल्ली, 10 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2490.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधाग ( 1 ) द्वाग प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय भारत सरकार की अधिसूचना का. आ. 1302 दिनांक 12 मई 2009 भारत के गजपत्र दिनांक 16 मई 2009 में प्रकाशित अधिसूचना में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है ।

पृष्ठ संख्या 2553 तहसील हांसी कॉलम ( 1 ) , लाईन 25 गांव का नाम वाम की जगह गांव वास वादशाहपुर पढा जाये । पृष्ठ संख्या 2553 तहसील हांसी कॉलम ( 2 ), लाईन 25 हदवम्त संख्या 95 की जगह हदवस्त संख्या 97 पढा जाये ।

[फा. सं. आर-31015/10/2009- ओ.आर.- II ]

ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव 5285

भारत का राजपंत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड3 ( ii) ]

NewDelhi , the 10th September, 2009

S. O. 2490.-In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962(50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments to the Ministry ofPetroleum and Natural Gas Government of India notification No. S.O 1302 dated 12 May2009 published in the Gazette of India dated 16 May 2009 as under namely;

Atpage 2565, Tehsil Hansi in column (1) , Line 25 , Name of Village Bas maybe read as Village Bas Badshapur, Atpage 2565 , Tehsil Hansi in column (2) , Line 25, Hadbast No. 95 maybe read as HadbastNo. 97.

[F. No. R-31015/10/2009- O.R. -II ] A. GOSWAMI , UnderSecy

नई दिल्ली , 10 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2491.- केन्द्रीय सरकार, पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962(1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए पैट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय भारत सरकार की अधिसूचना का. आ . 1303 दिनांक 12 मई 2009 भारत के राजपत्र दिनांक 16 मई 2009 में प्रकाशित अधिसूचना में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है ।

पृष्ठ संख्या 2585 गांव फत्ता मालुका कालॅम (3 ), लाईन 9 मुस्ततिल नम्बर 257 की जगह मुस्ततिल नम्बर 255 पढ़ा जाये । पृष्ठ संख्या 2590 गांव हिरके कालॅम (3) , लाईन 17 मुस्ततिल नम्बर 71 की जगह मुस्ततिल नम्बर 70 पढ़ा जाये । पृष्ठ संख्या 2590 गांव हिरके कालॅम (3), लाईन 19 मुस्ततिल नम्बर 72 की जगह मुस्ततिल नम्बर 71 पढ़ा जाये । पृष्ठ संख्या 2590 गांव हिरके कालॅम (3) , लाईन 20 मुस्ततिल नम्बर 73 की जगह मुस्ततिल नम्बर 72 पढ़ा जाये ।

[फा. सं. आर-31015/11/2009- ओ.आर.- II ] ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 10th September, 2009

S.O. 2491. In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments to the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of india notification No. S.O 1303 dated 12 May2009 published in the Gazette of India dated 16 May 2009 as under namely;

5286

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[Part II-Sec..3 (ii) ] Atpage 2606, Village Fatta Maluka In column (3) , Line 9, Mustatil No. 257 may be read as Mustatil No. 255 .

At page 2611 , Village Hirke in column (3), Line 17, Mustatil No. 71 may be read as Mustatil No.70 .

Atpage 2611 , Village Hirke in column (3) , Line 19 , Mustatil No. 72 may be read as Mustatil No.71 .

At page 2611 , Village Hirke in column (3) , Line 20 , Mustatil No. 73 maybe read as

Mustatil No.72 .

[F. No. R-31015/11 /2009-O.R. -II ] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy

नई दिल्ली, 11. सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2492.- भारत सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि , मैसर्स रिलायंस गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड की काकीनाडा -हैदराबाद- उरान - अहमदाबाद ट्रंक गैस पाइपलाइन के आन्ध्र प्रदेश में विजयवाड़ा स्थित टैप ऑफ प्वाइंट से देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में उपभोक्ताओं तक प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए , मैसर्स रिलोजिसटिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड द्वारा विजयवाड़ा- नैल्लूर- चैन्नई पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और, भारत सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूमि में , जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः , अब , भारत सरकार , पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के संबंध में , श्री एम.ए. गफार , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , मैसर्स रिलोजिसटिक्स इनःगस्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड , न. 59-1-18 / 3 , मैरिस स्टेला कॉलेज के सामने की रोड़ में , बस रूट नं.5 , रामचन्द्रा नगर , विजयवाडा-520008 , कृष्णा जिला , आन्ध्रप्रदेश राज्य को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

अनुसूची मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक:कोल्लूरू

5287 राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला:गुन्दूरू

गाँव कानाम

सर्वे सं. / सब डिविजन सं.

2 1

1) गाजुल्लंका

106

2) ईपुरू

107

108

120

338

339

340

341

343

344

345

346

349

350

351

352

402

आर.ओ.यू. अर्जित करने के लिए क्षेतफल

हेक्टेयर एयर सि एयर 3

5 00

35 00 19

84 00

53 00

42 00

00 82

29 00 *46

74 00 19

00 06

21 00

60 00

00 18

28 00 24

65 00 14

16 00 10

26 00 31

17 00 21

68 00 03

27 00 44

39 00 12

76 00

56 00

गट नंबर 402 में कृष्णा नदी

453

455

456

465

467

469

470

471

565

00 33

25 00

36 00

00 43

54 00 05

34 00 04

37 00 14

40 00

गट नंवर 565 में कृष्णा नदी

5288

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21. 1931

3) चिलुमूरू

100

102

121

122

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

5. 00

17 00 10

00 05

28 00 42.

02 00

41 00

10 00

00 42

06 00

00 10

05 00

00 09

गट नंबर 122 में नदी

130

132

133

350

4) अनन्तावरम

356

357

358

359

360

361

370

371

374

377

378

379

405

406

407

408

409/ए

409/बी

410/वी

413

414

67 00 24

00 06

00 00 02

60 00 39

70 00 29

00 11

32 00 08

84 00 72 06

74 00

75 00 21

68 00 08 57

20 00 41

09 00

78 00

34 00

00 21

90 00 08

26 00 21

64 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

2 1

538

4) अनन्तावरम (निरंतर)

5289 3

5 00 05

72 राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला:गुन्दूरू

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक:वेमूर

238

1 ) कुच्चल्लापाडु

248

64बी

66बी

126

127

129

130

133

237ए

243

244

245

246

247

251

2) वराहपुरम

3175 G1/09-16

00 15

00 00

05 00

00 38

56 00 62

34 00 60

59 00 32

99 00 21

74 00

00 28

73 00 54

00 00

65 00 02

01 00 49

99 00 27

34 00 06

28 00 00

00 06

00 00 08

00 00 32

00 48

10 00 52

31 00 08

08 00

80 00

90 00 05

00 00

32 00

40 5290

[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931 .

2) वराहपुरम (निरंतर)

3 ) वेमूर

42/ए

42/बी

80/ए

81/ए

292

296

297

298

299

300

301

303

5 00 57

96 00

53 00

15 00

07 00

00 37

20 00

00 00

23 00 08

38 00

02 00 08

00 42

49 00

95 37

20 00

40 00 21

00 00

40 00

67 00

81 00 03

26 00

10 00

97 00 04

00 09

71 00 48

17 00 17

04 00 02

29 00 08

00 00 02

गट नंबर 303 में रोड

306

307

310

342

343

87 00

05 00

79 00

28 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

5291

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

344

3) वेपूर (निरंतर)

486

487

499

501

502

509

510

511

515

516

517

593

596

597/ए

598/ए

598/बी

612

613

615

618

619

624

625

628/बी

629

633

634

639

640

655

656

663

672

678

681

682

683

685

5 00

10 00 18

39 00 25 57 00

46 00 40

45 00

16 37

00 04

24 00 54

27 00 04

88 00

37 04

00 42

48 00 08

63 00 29

00 32

68 00

12 00

77 00 22

44 06

38 00

53 00 52

93 00 07

60 00

30 00 00

10 00

41 00

93 00

16 00 27

71. 00

32 00 25

00 08

72 00

99 00

18 00 06

60 00 19

32 00 08

77 00

37 18

84 00 03

67 5292

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

686

3) वेमूर (निरंतर)

687

1316

1317

1335

1336

4) घेरावली

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii)]

5 00 47

95 00

30 00

39 00

21 00

89 00

गट नंबर 795 में नाला

846

847

848

852

853

854

855

856

857

858

859

60 00 02

00 27

71 00. 28

75 00

65 00

45 00

21.

34 00

95 00 12

58 00

28 00

गट नंबर 860 में नाला

912

1400

1498

1501

1502

1503

1504

1505

1506

1511

1512

1514

1519

1520

1525

95 00

62 00

60 43

36 00 01

43 00

27 00 61

51 00 00

33 00

00 00 06

65 00 05

59 00 01

38 00 41

31 00

00 02

गट नंबर 1525 में नाला

1527

1528

1529

1566

89 00

52 00 50

79 00

12 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

5293

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

2 1

1569

4) पेरावली (निरंतर)

1570

1571

1572

1574

1575

1592

1593

1597

1598

1600

5 3

24 00

83 00

56 00

21 00 26

66 00

67 00 18

58 00

गट नंबर 1600 में संदरा पापय्या टैंक

1602

68 00 08

गट नंबर 1602 में रास्ता

1603

1604

1608

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: अमरथालूरू

00 16

90 00 39

61 राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला:गुन्दूरू

424

1) अमरथालूरू

425

426

427

439

444

445

446

447

448

449

460

461

462

463

468

477

478

479/ए

479/बी

481/बी

482

00 09

00 00 55

93 00

00 41

82 00 05

50 00 03

32 00

30 00 45

43 00 13

88 00

13 00

59 00 13

55 00 05

12 00 15

42 5294

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

483

1) अमरथालूरू (निरंतर)

484

512

858

868

869

870

871

872

873

882

883

892

893

896

897

898

952

953

954

955

956

957

960

965

967

968

975

991

992

994

995

1003

1004

1005

1011

1012

1013

1014

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

5 00 44

81 00

33 00

15 00

10 00 38

63 00

86 22

58 00

79 00

00 19

64 00 10

00 17

64 00

20 00

91 00

59 00

00 00

10 00 49

53 00 09

94 00

92 00 01

49 00

61 30

83 00

44 00 14

19 00

41 00 46

32 00 13

00 54

41 00

31 22

15 00 45

00 00

10 भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

2 1

1015

1 ) अमरयालूरू (निरंतर)

1016

1017

1018

1144

429

2) गोवाडा

434

436

437

438

439

440

442

443

444

445

446

448

451

453

454

455

458ए

482

502

504

505

507

1201

1202

175

3) यलावरू

176

177

178

5295

3 .

52 29

87 00

00 40

14 00

.86 00

96 00 03

23 00 57

93 20

93 00

26 00 18

56 00 24

10 00

46 00

72 00

60 00

50 00

90 00 74

05 00

26 00

00 04

50 00 25

19 00 05 09 00 31

88 06

47 00

गट नंबर 180 में रास्ता

297/बी

298/बी

299/ए

299/बी 00 01

79 00 06

35 00 06

02 00 5296

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009 /BHADRA 21 , -1931

2 .1

306

3) यलावरू (निरंतर)

307

308

309

310

332

333

335

351

352

356

357

[Part II Sec. 3 ( ii) ]

5 3.

79 02

00 03

89 00

98 00 19

95 00

99 00 02

64 00 09

61 00 31

00 42

68 00 43

90 26

18 26

67 07

26 00

गट नंबर 358 में रास्ता

360

401

402

00 59

99 20

52 09

गट नंबर 403 में रास्ता

453

19 00

गट नंबर 318 और 305वी के बीच में रास्ता

4) ईन्दुर

128

130

131

154

155

156

159

172

185

187

188

190

191

192

212

213

214

216

217

218

33 00 08

28 00

46 00 16

26 00

46 00 10

24 00 24

48 00

15 00

29 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

219

4) ईन्दुर (निरंतर)

234

296

301

302

304ए

305ए

305बी

315

316ए

316वी

317ए

317बी

318

330ए

330बी

331

332

343

344

345

738

740

742

743

744

747

748

749

750

752

753

754

755

756

770

780

784

786ए 3175GI/09-17

5297 4

5 00 02

11 00 32

55 00 08

29 00 38

77 34

03 00

20 00

36 00 18

11 00

22 00

88 00

45 00 45

72 00

52 00

20 00

94 00

90 00

24 00

05 00 18

29 00 12

35 00 04

70 00 : 03

42 00 28

00 19

12 00 12

95 00 39

57 00

99 00

00 50 49

00 5298

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii ) |

787

29 4) ईन्दुर (निरंतर)

788वी

789वी

791

852

859

860

861 ए

864

00 08

865

00 35

875ए

876

877

878

00 . 03

880ए

886

1216

1218

00 14

1219

1240

00 06

[फा. सं. एल-14014/30/2009-जी.पी.

मनु श्रीवास्तव, निदेशक

New Delhi , the 11th September , 2009

S.O. 2492.- Whereas it appears to the Government of India that it is necessary in public interest that for transportation of natural gas frorn tap off point of Kakinada -Hyderabd - Uran - Ahmedabd trunk gas pipeline at Vijayawada in Andhra Pradesh of M/ s . Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited to consumers in various parts of the country , Vijaywada-Nellore -Chennai pipeline should be laid by M/s . Relogistics Infrastructure Limited;

And , whereas , it appears to Government of India that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of powers conferredby sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), Government of India hereby declares its intention to acquire the Right of user therein ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date of which the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India under sub - section ( 1) of Section 3 of the said Act, are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of Right of User therein for laying the pipeline under the land to Shri M.A. Gaffar, Competent Authority, Relogistics Infrastructure Limited , House No. 59-1-18 /3 , Opp Road toMaries Stella college , Bus route No.5 , Ramachandra Nagar , Vijaywada -520008 , Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh State.

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

5299

Schedule

District:Guntur Mandal /Tehsil /Taluk : Kolluru

Village

Survey No./Sub-Division No.

2 1

1) Gazullanka

106

2) Ipuru

107

108

120

338

339

340

341

343

344

345

346

349

350

351

352

402

State: Andhra Pradesh

Area to be acquired for RoU

C-Are Hec

Are

Krishna River in Gat No.402

453

455

456

465

467

469

470

471

565

36 00

Krishna River in Gat No.565

5300

[Part II-Sec. 3( ii ) ] .

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

2 1

3) Chilumuru

.82

100

102

121

122

River in Gat No.122

130

132

133

350

4) Anantavaram

356

357

358

359

360

361

370

371

374

377

378

379

405

406

407

408

409/A

409/B

410/B

413

414

00.

64 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ শায় 21 , 1931

[ भाग - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

538

4) Anantavaram(Contd)

District:Guntur Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk :Vemur

238

1) Kuchchallapadu

248

64B

66B

126

127

129

130

133

237A

243

244

245

246

247

251

2) Varahapuram

-5301

State: Andhra Pradesh

00.

00 5302

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009 /BHADRA 21 , 1931

49 2) Varahapuram( Contd)

39 3) Vemur

42/A

42/B

80/A

81/A

292

296

297

298

299

300

301

303

Road in Gat No.303

306

307

310

342

343 4

Continued ...... 6 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

5303

भारत काराजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

344

3) Vemur (Contd)

486

487

499

501

502

509

510

511

515

516

517

593

596

597/A

598/A

598/B

612

613

615

618

619

624

625

628/B

629

633

634

639

640

655

656

663

672

678

681

682

683

685

37 00

22.

10. 38

67 5304

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

2 1

686

3) Vemur(Contd)

687

1316

1317

1335

1336

Nala in Gat No.795 4) Peravali

846

847

848

852

853

854

855

856

857

858

859

Nala inGat No.860

912

1400

1498

1501

1502

1503

1504

1505

1506

1511

1512

1514

1519

1520

1525

Nala inGat No.1525

1527

1528

1529

1566

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii)] 3

12 5305

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

1569 4) Peravali ( Contd)

1570

1571

1572

1574

1575

1592

1593

1597

1598

1600 4

67 00

10.

16.

Sandara Papaiah Tank in Gat No. 1600

1602

Cart Track in Gat No.1602

1603

1604

1608

District:Guntur Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk : Amarthaluru

424 1) Amarthaluru

425

426

427

439

444

445

446

447

448

449

460

461

462

463

468

477

478

479/A

479/B

481/B

482 3175G1/09-18

State:Andhra Pradesh

09.

30 45

03 25 00

59 00

26 29

56 56 38

11 00

05:

12 80 00

42 5306

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

483

1) Amarthaluru (Contd)

484

512

858

868

869

870

871

872

873

882

883

892

893

896

897

898

952

953

954

955

956

957

960

965

967

968

975

991

992

994

995

1003

1004

1005

1011

1012

1013

1014

1015

1016

1017

1018

1144

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] 4

05 भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

429

2) Govada

434

436

437

438

439

440

442

443

444

445

446

448

451

453

454

455

458A

482

502

504

505

507

1201

1202

175

3) Yalavarru

176

177

178

Cart Track in Gat No.180

297/B

298/B

299/A

299 /B

306

307

308

309

310

332

333

335

351

352

356

357

CartTrack in Gat No.358

360

401

402

Cart Track in Gat No.403

453

5307

-00

89 00

98 00

39 00

68 00

18 00

26 00

15 00

52 00

19 00 5308

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

2 4) Intur

Cart track between Gat No. 318 & 305B 00

128

130

131

154

155

156

159

172

185

187

188

190

191

192

212

213

214

216

217

218

219

234

296

301

302

304A

305A

305B

315

316A

316B

317A

317B

318

330A

330B

331

332

343

344

345

738

[Part 11-Sec . 3 ( ii )] 3

16. 00

12:

03 00

00:

01.

00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

740 4) (Contd)

742

743

744

747

748

749

750

752

753

754

755

756

770

780

784

786A

787

788B

789B

791

852

859

860

861A

864

865

875A

876

877

878

880A

886

1216

1218

1219

1240

5309 3

[F. No. L-14014/30/2009-G.P.

MANU SRIVASTAVA , Director 5310

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/ BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART 11--SEC . 3 (ii) ]

APPEARANCES

श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय

Forthe Petitioner

नई दिल्ली , 13 अगस्त, 2009

: M/ s . A.V. Sambasiva Rao and A.S. Ramasarma . Advocates

For the Respondent : M/ s . S. Udayachala Rao,

S. Vikramaditya Babu and

S. Mujib Kumar , Advocates

AWARD

का.आ. 2493. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार आन्ध्रा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण श्रम न्यायालय , हैदराबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 64/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -12025/ 1/2009- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] .

This case was taken in view of the judgement ofthe Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in 1997 (3) LLJ Supplement , page 1141 in W.P. No. 8395 of 1989 dated3-8-1995between Sri U. Chinnappa and M/ s . Cotton Corporation of India and two others .

राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi , the 13th August , 2009

2. The Petitioner filed this petition against the Respondents questioning the action of the Respondents in terminating his services w.e.f. 17-5-97 without any notice or order . He stated that he joined in the respondent organization w.e.f. 26-3-1993 and he worked with intermittent breaks upto 17-5-97 for 1249 days . He prayed thiscourt to direct the Respondent to reinstate him with back wages , continuity of service etc.

S.O. 2493.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 64/2004 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Andhra Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 12-8-2009 .

[No. L- 12025/1 /2009 -IR (B - II ) ]

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT, HYDERABAD

3.A counter was filed denying the allegations made bythe petitioner in the claim petition . It is submitted that in the past , the branches of the bank used to engage persons insubordinate staff cadre in leave vacancies of permanent workmen or to cope up with the additional work of temporary nature as and when the situation demanded, though they were not authorized to make such temporary appointments . The management has issued as Approach Paperand prepared panels for temp ; orary employees who has put in service between the period 1-1-1982 to 31-12-1989 and subject to certain other eligibility criteria . Asper this criteria, the Petitioner is not eligible for empanelment.Hence , It is prayed that in view of the above , thepetition be dismissed .

Present : Shri Ved Prakash Gaur, Presiding Officer

Dated the 17th day of February , 2009

Industrial Dispute L.C. No. 64/2004

Between:

4. Partites were asked to produce their respective evidences . Petitioner filed his chief examination affidavit as WWI and marked documents Ex . WI and W2 . Ex . WI isthe copy of the order in WP No. 22198/1997 and F.x. W2 isthe copy of Petitioner's representation dated 19-5-1997 . Petitioner was cross examined and case is fixed for further evidence of Petitioner .

5.On 17-2-2009 , Petitioner is not attending the case for last more than a year . As such evidence is closed. Hence. Nil Award is passed in absence of evidence .

...... Petitioner

Sri Boddu Veera Venkata Murali Krishna, S/ o Sri Suryanarayana , D. No. 50-6-4/4 , Srihari Veedhi , Seethammapeta , Visakhapatnam - 16

Award passed accordingly . Transmit .

AND

Dictated to Smt . P. Phani Gowri , Personal Assistant . transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 17th day ofFebruary, 2009 .

1. The General Manager, (Staff Department) , Andhra Bank , Central Office , Saifabad , Hyderabad .

VED PRAKASH GAUR , Presiding Officer Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner

Witnesses examined for the Respondent

WW1 : Sri B.V.V. Murali Krishna NIL

Respondents

2. The Assistant General Manager . Andhra Bank , Zonal Office , Seethammadhara , Viskhapatnam.

5311

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Documents marked for the Petitioner

APPEARANCES

Ex.WI: Copy oforder in WP No. 22198/1997

Forthe Workman : None

Ex. W2 : Copy of WW I's representation dt . 19-5-97

For the Management : Shri V.K. Dhiwan .

Documents marked for the Respondent

AWARD

NIL

Passed on 15-7-2009

नई दिल्ली , 13 अगस्त, 2009

The Central Government vide notification No. L- 12012 /98 / 2002-1R( B- II ) dated 24-9-2002, has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

का.आ. 2494.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक आफ बड़ौदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधि करण , नं. 1 चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 222/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

"Whether the workman has completed 240 days service or not ? If so , the action of the management ofBank of Baroda in terminating the services of Shri Hari Singh S/o Shri Dhan Singh , peon w.c.f. 7-1-2002 is just and legal ? If not , what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ? " [सं. एल-12012/98/2002- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th August , 2009

2.None appeared for the workman , Counsel for the management is present. It is informed that workman has expired. Therefore, the referrence is abated and returned as such to the Central Government for want of prosecution . Central Government be infomed . File be consigned .

Chandigarh G. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

15-7-2009

नई दिल्ली, 13 अगस्त, 2009

S.O. 2494. In pursuance of Section 17 of the the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 222/2002 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal Chandigarh- 1 now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Bank of Baroda and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 12-8-2009.

[No. L- 12012/ 98 /2002-1R(B- II ) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

का.आ. 2495.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नैशनल बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधि करण , नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 7/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA , PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

[सं. एल-12012/173/2004- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी Case No. I.D. 222/2002

New Delhi , the 13th August , 2009 Sh . Hari Singh , C / o Shri K.S. Malhotra , 107/2. South Model Gram,

Ludhiana - 141001 .

Applicant

Versus

The Regional Manager ,

S.O. 2495.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No.7/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Punjab National Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 12-8-2009 .

Bank ofBaroda, Regional Office Punjab bank Square , Sector , 17 - В , Chandigarh - 160017 .

[No. L - 12012/ 173/2004 - IR ( B - II ) | RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

....Respondent 5312

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D. 7/2005

Sh . Sunil Kumar Sharma S/ o Late Shri Sham Dass Sharma, B -5 / 11 , Khwaza Azam Khoti , Ludhiana .

Applicant

Versus

The Zonal Manager , Punjab National Bank, Zonal Office, Ferozegandhi Market , Ludhiana - 141008 .

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] New Delhi , the 13th August, 2009

S.O. 2496.-in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref . No.48 /2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Union Bank of India and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Govemment on 12-8-2009 .

[No. L- 12012/ 104/2005 - IR( B - II ) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

.... Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the Workman : None

For the management : Shri Rajesh Gupta .

AWARD

Passed on 14-7-2009

The Central Government vide notification No.L- 12012/ 173 /2004-1R( B- 11 ) dated 27-12-2004 , has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether the action of the management of Punjab National bank , Ludhina in dismissing Shri Sunil Kumar Sharma, Ex -Clerk - cum- Cashier - cum Godwon Keeper from service w.e.f. 30-8-1996 is just and legal ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?"

2. Case repeatedly called . No one appeared for the workman . The case is already four years old. Despite notice the workman has not put up his appearance for his evidnece . It appears that workman is not interested to persue with the present claim in reference . Hence the present claim in the reference is returned to the Central Government as such for want of prosecution . Central Government be infomed . File be consigned .

G.K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer Chandigarh

14-7-2009

नई दिल्ली, 13 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2496.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनियन बैंक आफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नं. 1 चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 48/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -12012/104/2005- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]

राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRAKUMARSHARMA , PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D. No. 48/2005

Sh . Rajesh S/o Shri Ishwar Singh , R/ o Uttam Nagar Colony, H. No. 691 , Ward No. 17 , Hansi , Hissar .

Applicant

Versus

The Asstt. General Manager , Union Bank of India, Sector- 17 -A , Chandigarh .

.... Respondent

APPEARANCES

Forthe Workman : None

For the management : Shri V. K. Diwan

AWARD

Passed on 13-7-2009

The Central Government vide notification No.L- 12012/ 104/2005-1R( B - 11 ) dated 7-11-2005 , has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether the action of Shri Rajesh S /o Shri Ishwar Singh that he was engaged on daily wages as a Sewadar ( Peon) by the management ofUnion Bank of India during the period from 18-8-1997 to 30-11-2002 is correct ? If so whether the action of the management of Union Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri Rajesh w.e.f. 30-11-2002 is just and legal and what relief is the disputant entitled to ? "

2. Case repeatedly called. Workman is not present. No one is also present for the workman. Management is present through advocate . The workman is not comingfor 5313 भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 193

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

AWARD

Passed on : 6-7-2009

his evidence. It appears that workman is not interested to pursue with the present claim in reference as earlier also the case was dismissed in default for want of prosecution. In view of the above , the claim in present reference is returned to the Central Government for want of prosecution. Central Government be infomed . File be consigned.

Government of India by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , vide notification No.L - 12012/429 /95 - IR ( B - II ) dated 30-12-96 , referred the following Industrial Dispute for adjudication:

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer

Chandigarh 13-7-2009

नई दिल्ली , 13 अगस्त, 2009

"Whether the action of the management of Union Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri Jaswant Singh is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled and from which date ? "

From perusal of the pleadings of the parties , it is evidently clear that the main issue for adjudication before thisTribunal is regarding unauthorized absence of the workman from office and action of management regarding deemed voluntary retirement as per clause XVI of the Bipartite Settlement.

का.आ. 2497.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनियन बैंक आफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नं.। चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 75/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-12012/429/95- आई आर ( बी -11 ) ]

राजेन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th August, 2009

It isadmitted that the workman remained absent with effect from 24-01-1988 continuously for 90 days . The workman had contended that he fall sick and could not turn up to the bank and on this very ground of sickness he has prayed for setting aside the order of termination from services and for his reinstatement in the services with back wages and other benefits .

the S.O. 2497. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.75 /97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Union Bank of India and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 12-8-2009 .

[No. L- 12012/429 /95 - IR( B - II ) ]

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

The contention of the management of the bank is thatafter 90 days of unauthorized absence a notice bearing No. ROJ / STF / 516/ 88 dated 06-07-1988 was sent to the workman at his native place , which was received and acknowledge by the workman. The workinan did not complied with the notice within 30 days and remained absent . A final notice bearing No. ROJ/ STI/ 847/ 1988 dated 01-10-1988 was given to the workman , which was again acknowledged and received . The workman was required to join the duties within 30 days but he failed and accordingly he was deemed to be voluntary retired from servicesw.e.f. 11-07-1988 as per Clause XVI of Bipartite Settlement dated 17-09-1984.

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D. No. 75/97

The management of the bank has filed and proved bothofthe letters and acknowledgement receipts . In cross- examination the workman Shri Jaswant Singh had also admitted the receiving of the notice dated 06-07-1988 .

Shri Jaswant Singh C /o M. R. Dhiman, H.E. 1232, Phase 1 , Mohali , Ropar , Punjab

Applicant

I have heard counsels of both of the parties and perused all materials on record .

Versus

The Branch Manager , Union Bank of India, Civil Lines . G.T. Road, Jullundur.

..Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the Workman : Shri M. R. Dhiman

For the Management : Shri Dinesh Madra , A. R.

Extract of Clause XVI of 4th Bipartite Settlement is also record . I have gone through it. This provision make it clear that if a workman absented unauthorizedly for a continuous period of 90 days , it give an opportunity to the management to give a 30 days notice for joining the duties or in failure of joining the duties to explain the reasons of absence . If the workman joins the duties no consequence will follow under this clause . Accordingly . if the workman explains the reasons for his absence and 3175 G1/09--19 5314

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009 /BHADRA 21.1931

the reasons are sufficient to the satisfaction of the management , no action under this clause can be taken . Butifafter receiving this notice , workman neither explain the reason for absence nor join the duties he shall be deemed to be voluntarily retired from the services on expiration of30 days notice .

In this case , absence for 90 days is admitted . It is also admitted that 30 days notice was received by the workman. It is also admitted that he did not join the duties nor explained the reasons for his absence . The workman has filed a document which is a Medical Certificate by a Doctor for three weeks . As per the Certificate the workman was suffering fiom Ameotic Liver since 25-01-1988 and he was advised for three weeks rest . No other document has been filed or relied upon by the workman . This three weeks rest period as advised by the Doctor expired within 90 days of his absence but he did not bother for reporting to the bank by showing his explanation in response to the 30 days notice to the management about the cause of his absence . Thus , the workman has without any reason neither joined the duties even after receiving the 30 days notice nor explained the reasons to the management of thebank for his absence . Thus , after expiration of 30days notice as per the provisions of Clause XVI of the 4th Bipartite Settlement the workman was rightly treated as voluntary retired from the services and has no case for any relieffrom this Tribunal .

He was deemed to be voluntary retired from the service in the year 1988 and he raised the industrial dispute in the year 1995 after 8 years without explaining the cause ofdelay. On this issue as well , the workman has no right to any relieffrom this Tribunal. Yesterday on 02-07-2009 a Division Bench of Justice Ashutosh Mohunta and Justice Nirmaljit Kaur of Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in a case titled as Ishwar Singh Versus Panipat Cooperative Sugar Mill Ltd. , asserted that no latitude can be shown to aworkman who does not intend to work even on repeated requests made by the Management to do so . The court held " Such an insincere and dishonest workman is a deadwood in any management , who rather than being a help to the management is a burden not only upon them , but also on the state exchequer . " ( Judgment published in the Tribune on 03-07-2009 reference is yet not available ) .

Thus , on the basis of findings made in the body of thisaward, the reference is disposed of accordingly . The workman is not entitled for any relief from this Tribunal . Let Central Government be informed for publication of the award and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

G.K.SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 13 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2498.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सैंट्रल बैंक ऑफ

PAR! 11 SEC. 3 ( ii) | इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नं. । चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 1/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -12011/116/2004- आई आर ( बी 11 ) |

राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th August , 2009

S.O. 2498.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.1 /2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Central Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 12-8-2009 .

[No. L- 12011 / 116/2004 - IR ( B- II ) | RAJINDER KUMAR , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SITARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT IINDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - 1 , CHANDIGARII

Case No. I.D. No. 1/2005

TheGeneral Secretary Central Bank of India Employees' Union , 3296 , Sector 19 -D , Chandigarh - 160019.

Applicant

Versus

1. The Chairman & Managing Director , Central Bank of India Chandermukhi Building , Nariman Point , Mumbai .

2. Zonal Manager , Central Bank of India . Zonal Office , Bank Square , Sector- 17, Chandigarh .

....Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the Workman : Sri B. S. Gill For the management Sri N. K. Zakhmi 1

5315 भारत का राजपत्र : मई 23, 2009/ज्येष्ठ 2 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

AWARD

has no right to promotion and in absence of any statutory provision , Sh . Sarna can not claim promotion as a right .

Passed on 13-7-2009

The Government of India vide notification No. L- 12011/ 116/2004- IR( B - II ) dated 23-11-2004, referred the following industrial dispute forjudicial adjudication :

"Whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India, Chandigarh in not promoting and granting any special allowance to Shri Y. K. Sarna for performing his duties for the last 36 years as Air Condition Plant Operator in Clerical cadre as per policy of the bank and provisions of Bipartite Settlement is legal and just ? If not , what relief the said workman is entitled to and from which date ? "

1have gone through the pleadings of the parties and the evidence adduced by them oral and documentary .

Opportunity for arguments was also given to the parties in person and to their legal advisors .

It is admitted that workman Sh . Y. K. Sarna was appointed as Air Condition Plant Operator on 22-7-67 in clerical grade pay. The appointment letter, which is on record, shows that Sh . Sarna was appointed as Air Condition Plant Operator on a post expecially createdby the management of the bank through the administrative arrangement for its smooth functioning . The creation of post is not mentioned in bipartite settlement or Desai and Shastri awards . It was especially created for exigency of workby management . It is also admitted that Sh Y.K. Sarna served the bank for more than 36 years on the same post and retired as such as Air Condition Plant Operator . Sh . Sarna had represented the bank several times for his promotion to the officer cadre but no heed was given to his representations , in spite of several resolutions passed in the meetings held between the management of the bank and employees union . In the minutes of the meeting held on 21-3-94, matter relating to Sh . Sarna is mentioned at Para No.7 . It was resolved in this meeting that immediate implementation of every promotion policy of specialized categories vis . Air Condition Plant Operator , Telephone Mechanic, Plant Bank Operator etc. in the joint discussion will be considered on selective basis as and called necessary but specially in those cases where the employees in the general cadre who are junior to these specialized cadre employees have already been promoted under state services .

The minutes of meeting dated 21-3-94 shows that management of bank has adopted and agreed for the implementation of promotion policy of Air Condition Plant Operator apart from other categories of workers . But the request of Sh . Y. K. Sarna was not considered by the management for promotion for the reasons known to the management.

It is true that there is no mention of such post in Shastri and Desai award or any of other bipartite settlements . This post was created by the department through the administrative order. Where the post is created through the administrative order , the administrative order should contain the service conditions attach to the post and service condition also includes the right to promotion. I am not inclined to accept the contention of the management that there is no administrative order or rule for the promotion of the workman because similarly placed another workman Sh . B. P. Sharma who was appointed as AirCondition Plant Operator was promoted to the officer cadre and he retired as Assistant Manager (Spl ) from Zonal office Delhi . During recording of evidence and hearing arguments , this Tribunal afforded the opportunity to the management , rather directed the management to file entire records regarding the service conditions of Sh. B.P. Sharma who retired as Assistant Manager (Spl ) from Zonal Office Delhi on 28-2-2002 . It was contended by the workman that Sh . B. P. Sharma was his junior and he was promoted to the managerial capacity, whereas , his right to promotion was denied. On this contention , the record relating to the service of Sh . B. P. Sharma were summoned and called for by this Tribunal . It was admitted by the management that Sh . B. P. Sharma was recruited as Air Condition Plant Operator and he retired from the services as Assistant Manager (Spl ) on 28-2-2002 . It was admitted that Sh . B. P. Sharma was promoted to the post of Assistant Manager (Spl ) w.e.f. 1-1-1986 . But relevant documents relating to the services of Sh . B.P. Sharma were not placed before this Tribunal . The management of Central Bank of India only filed a letter No. ZO/ HRD/ PKG/08-09 /3373 dated 15th January 2009, informing this Tribunal that Sh . B.P. Sharma was appointed as Air Condition Plant Operator and was promoted as Assistant Manager ( Spl ) w.c.f. 1-1-86 and he retired from the services as Assistant Manager ( Spl ) on 28-2-2002 . No other documents were placed before this Tribunal . Meaning thereby an Air Condition Plant Operator was promoted by the Central Bank of India as Assistant Manager ( Spl ) . Central bank of India being a Corporation has done it under the administrative orders . Meaning thereby the post of Air ConditionOperator was created by administrative orders and Sh . B. P. Sharma an Air Condition Plant Operator was promoted as Assistant Manager ( Spl ) by administrative orders . But those administrative orders were not placed before this Tribunal reasons known to the managemeent . Meaning thereby, the management has neglected in filing the documents and materials regarding the service condition and right to promotion of Air Condition Plant Operator to Assistant Manager ( Spl ) , whereas one of the AirCondition Plant Operator Sh . B. P. Sharma was promoted by the management . Under such circumstances an adverse inference shall be taken against the management of the bank. The question arise what should The strong contention of the management is that there is no policy for promotion of Sh . Y. K. Sarna to the officer cadre. Thus in absence of any policy in any of the bipartite settlement ar.d Desai and Shastri awards Sh . Sama 5316

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

be the nature of adverse inference? In my view the nature ofadverse inference should be that it shall he considered that there is a policy of the bank for promotion of Air Condition Plant Operator to Assistant Manager (Spl ) and it shall also be considered that date of implementation of policy will be the date on which Sh . B.P. Sharma was promoted to Assistant Manager ( Spl ) .

Itisnot the case of the management of the bank that the promotion was denied due to the act of workman. It is the only contention of the bank that the promotion was denied due to the lack of any administrative order rules or regulations . I am not inclined to accept this contention of thebank because one of the Air Ccondition Plant Operator Sh . B. P. Sharma was promoted as Assistant Manager (Spl ) under the administrative orders of the management.

Apart from this issue of facts that under the administrative order Sh . B. P. Sharma an Air Condition PlantOperator was promoted to Assistant Manager ( Spl ) it is also important to mention that Sh . B.P. Sharma was similarly placed employee as of Sh . Y. K. Sarna. It is not the case of the management that Sh . B.P. Sharma was promoted under some special immunity ( Classification). Thus , denying the promotion to Sh . Y. K. Sarna is also the infringement of his right to equality and right to life and personal liberty protected , as Fundamental Rights under Article 14 and 21 ofthe Constitution . Discrimination may be allowed on the basis of reasonable classification but in .this case there is no classification at all , hence the workman shall be considered eligible for the promotion w.e. f. 1-1-86 , the date from which Sh . B: P. Sharma was promoted asAssistant Manager ( Spl ) .

Thus , the reference is answered in negative that action of management of Central Bank of India , Chandigarh in not promoting and granting any special allowance to Sh . Y. K. Sarna for performing his duties for the last 36 years as Air Condition Plant Operator in clerical cadre as per policy of the bank and provisions of Bipartite is not legal and just . Sh . Y. K. Sarna, on the basis of the reasons disclosed in the body of the award , is entitled for the promotion to the post of Assistant Manager ( Spl) w.e.f. 1-1-86 . The management is directed to make good all the pay & allowances , perks and other facilities attach to the post of Assistant Manager ( Spl ) from 1-1-86 within one month from the date of publication of the award . It is hereby made clear that if the entire amount is paid and other benefits given within one month from the date of publication of the award; workman , will not be entitled for any interest . If the management failed to do so , workman will be entitled for an interest at the rate of 7% per annum from the date of filing this petition till final realization of entire amount . Let Central Government be approached for publication of award and thereafter , file be consigned to record room,

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] नई दिल्ली , 13 अगस्त, 2009

का. आ. 2499.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय न . 2 मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 2/94/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-09 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/ 132/2002- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी PARS

NewDelhi , the 13th August, 2009

S.O. 2499. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 2/94/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunat/ Labour Court No.2 , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Bank of India and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 12-8-09 .

[No. L- 12012/ 132/2002 - IR( B- II ) ]

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT IINDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2, MUMBAI Present : A.A.LAD , Presiding Officer

Reference No. CGIT -2/94 of 2002 Employers in Relation to the Management of Bank of India

The General Manager( P) , Bank of India , Mumbai South Zone , BOI Bldg . , M.G. Road ,Fort, Mumbai -400 023 .

..... First Party V/s.

There Workman

Sh . Shankar Laxman Pawar ,

92/4, Municipal Chawl ,Gr . Flr. , Jerbai Wadia Road , Parel , Mumbai -400012 .

..... Second Party

APPEARANCES

FortheEmployer : Ms. Nandini Menon and Mr. S.K. Talsania , Advocates Forthe Workmen : Shri R. Dube Patil , Advocate Date of reserving the Award I : 23-1-2009 . Date of passing the Award I : 2-6-2009 .

5317 [ भाग 1 ]- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सिकम्बर 12, 2009/মার 21., 1931

AWARD

1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L - 12012 / 132 /2002 { IR ( B - II ) } dated 7th November, 2002 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub -section 2(A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the followingdispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Bank of India, Mumbai South Zone , Mumbai to dismiss Shri Shankar Laxman Pawar from service w.e.f. 28-6-2001 is justified? If not, what relief the workman , Shri Sankar Laxman Pawaris entitled to ?

2.Claim Statement is filed by the concernedworkman atExhibit 9 stating that, he joined 1st party as a temporary Sepoy on 7-2-1985 and was made padmanent on 1-6-1989. He further states that, he worked at doobe Circle tiranch of -the 1stParty.

time, he was assured that , enquiry will be conducted as a formality and he will not be punished on the basis of that enquiry. He states that , in view of the continued assurances from the employer that no action will be taken on the basis of the enquiry, the concerned workman was misled to believe that, and the enquiry proceedings were being conducted and 2nd Party attended it on 22-12-2000. 2nd Party states that , in the said enquiry general topics were discussed after which Enquiry Officer prepared the alleged minutes ofthe enquiry proceedings in English and obtained signatures on the same without explaining the same to the concerned werkman in Marathi . He contends that, the said enquiry was commenced and concluded on 22-12-2000 itself. Even minutes were written of that meeting werewrittenby the Enquiry Officer himself. He contends that, only one witness namely Mr. Kurup , Chief Manager , was examined though names of vienses were given in the list of witnesses given by the 1st Party, 2nd Party submits that, if the evidence of the said witnesses is perused it can be seen that , the said witness of the Ist Party was not working in the Branch of the 2nd Party where he was working. The witness examined by the Ist Party before the Enquiry Officer only deposed regarding preliminary enquiry conducted by him . It is case of the 2nd Party that , he was not given an opportunity to participate in the enquiry . According to 2nd Party, said evidence was not sufficient to hold 2nd Party guilty of the charges. It is case of the 2nd Party that , no written submissions were submitted by both . It is alleged that , the evidence before the Enquiry Officer was not sufficient to hold him guilty of the charges leveled aginst him . It is alleged that, the finding given by the Enquiry Officer dated 5-5-2001 is perverse and the decision taken by the Disciplinary Authority on the basis of the finding of the EnquiryOfficer is against the principles of natural justice and is fake one . It is contention of the 2nd Party that, he preferred appeal on the same which was not considered by the 1st Party and the Appellate Authority confirmed the dicision of the DisciplinaryAuthority. According to him decision of the Disciplinary Authority suffers from various lacunas . He states that , Enquiry Officer as well as Disciplinary Authority failed to appreciate the evidence onrecord. He states that, they have not applied their mind.. He states that, enquiry was not fair and proper and finding perverse . So he prayed that, his dismissal order may be declared as illegal and 1st Party be directed to reinstate him with back wages .

4. Thisis disputed by the 1st Party by filing written statement at Exhibit 11 making out the case that , the dispute raised by 2nd Party is not maintainable and is beyond jurisdiction of the Tribunal . It is stated that , enquiry was conducted in respect of the charge leveled against the concerned workman which is of a scrious nature . Charge of misconduct was leveled against the concerned workman which was proved before the Enquiry 3. He states that, on 24-7-1998 he received a suspension order dated 16-6-1998 from the ChiefRegional Manager , Mumbai (South Region ) alleging that, he involved in transfer of funds from various accounts of customers of the employer belonging to one Bhansali Group without maintaining sufficient balance of funds in the account . On the said allegations he was placed under suspension for which he wrote letter dated 24-7-1998 requesting to revoke his suspension . Said suspension was there for more than one year . Then he was taken in service and suspension was revoked on 1-10-1999 and he joined services ofthe 1st Party. After that , on 20-10-2000 i.e. after about one year , after he joined his duties , he received letter from the General Manager (Personnel ) informing him that, is has decided to conduct an enquiry in respect of the charges mentioned in the charge sheet dated 20-10-2000 and has appointed Mr. P.D. Kashalkar as . Enquiry Officer, Staff Officer, Kalbadevi Branch. According to 2nd Party, charge leveled against him was that there was a collusion done by the concerned workman with Mr. S.G. Kachare , Staff officer and Shri V.P. Popat , AELPM Operator to withdraw the cash from S/B Account No. 18900 of the workman and issued 4 cheques bearing. Nos . 177986 , 177988 , 177989 and 177990 without maintaining sufficient balance in his account and subsequently for making good the short fall in the account the concerned workman adopted the method of depositing cheques later on . Accordingto the concerned workman he brought to the notice of the 1st Party that, the decision takenby it of forming Enquiry Committee and proceeding against concerned workman after about a year is not just and proper on the charges of alleged misconduct leveled against him . On which 1st Party informed him that, the said enquiry is nothing but a formality and no punishment will be awarded on the basis of the said enquiry . He further contends that accordingly on 22-12-2000 he was called to attend the proposed enquiry . He states that , even that 5318

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) |

charges were leveled against them . It is contended that , the 2nd Party was involved on the basis of final investigation conducted by the 1st Party on the basis of the material collected at the time of internal investigation. It is alleged that , based on internal departmental investigation , a criminal complaint was lodged with Central Bureau of Investigation on 30-5-1998 especially against Shri A.G. Vohra, the then Manager , Shri S.G. Kachare , the thenofficer and outsider Shri A.L. Bhansali . It is contended that, based on this complaint a criminal case was filed against them by the Central Bureau of Investigation . It is alleged that , since the criminal investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation was taking lot of time , Ist Party decided to revoke the suspension order of the employees involved in the reference and other employees who were concerned with it and then decided to proceed against the concerned workman by forming enquiry committee and appointing Enquiry Officer .It is contended that , full opportunity was given to the concerned workman to participate in the inquiry . He participated in the enquiry . It is contended that, on 6-3-1998 2nd Party withdrew Rs . 10,000 from his S.B. Account No. 189800 against cheque No. 177990 though there was no balance in his account . It is contended that , fictitious credit voucher for Rs . 10,000 was posted in his account to enable him to take cash . It is contended that , on the next day , he deposited a cheque No. 097520 dated 6-3-1998 for Rs . 10.000 from one of the customers M/ s . Maya Enterprises ( Bhanusali Group) in his account . It is contended that the said cheque was posted with a back dated effect of 6-3-1998 by one Shri Popat unauthorisedly. It is further contended that. another transaction is dated 12-4-1998 where concerned workman had issued cheque No. 177986 for Rs . 5000 in favour of V.P. Popat though there were no funds in his account . It is also contended that , a fictitious credit of Rs . 5000 was unauthorisedly posted by said Shri Popat and the cheque was passed . It is contended that , thereafter the concerned workman obtained a cheque No. 426232 from one of the customer M/ s. Sadia Garage and got the same posted on 13-4-1998 giving back dated effect of 12-4-1998 . It is further contended that , on 25-4-1996 Shri Popatwithdrew eash of Rs . 10,000 from his O/ D Account No. 2117 and Mr. Kachare withdrew Rs . 7500 from his O/ D Account No. 2115. It is contended that , no drawing limits were available in their respective accounts . It is contended that, the concerned workman issued 3 cheques i.e. 177988 for Rs . 7500 favouring S.G. Kachare , cheque No. 177989 for Rs . 7500 and cheque No. 177990 for Rs . 10,000 favouring himself. It is contended that , these credits were posted in the account of Shri Popat and Shri Kachare to enable them to withdraw the amount as stated above . It is contended that , there was no balance in his account ( m that day . It is further contended that, after two days the concerned workman obtained a back dated cheque Officer by the management in the departmental enquiry. Witnesses examined before the Enquiry Officer were made available to the concerned workman and the said witnesses were allowed to be cross examined by the representative of the concerned workman . It is contended that , the concerned workman was given full and fair opportunityto participate in the enquiry.It is contended that , the coneemed workman participated in the enquiry and he was allowed to be represented through his Defence Representative . It is contended that , during the period 1997 to 1998 certain employees of the Jacob Circle Branch of the 1st Party had colluded with certain outsiders and had perpetrated various irregularities at the Branch exposing the 1st Party to serious financial losses and had indulged in kite flying nature of transactions with these accounts they were having in other Banks /Branches . It is contended that , the modus operandi was to deposit clearing cheques which were purely of accommodation nature drawn on the accounts with other Banks / Branches in these accounts with Jacob Circle Branch and the Branch used to grant payment against effects before the cheques were actually cleared . These cheques used to be returned unpaid and in order to cover the same fresh cheques with still higher amounts were deposited against which also drawings were allowed and the chain was continued by the concerned workman with the help of other employees. Itisalleged that, initially transactions were to the tune of Rs. 1.02 lakhs during August , 1997. It is contended that, thereafter transactions escalated and touched over Rs . 95 lakhs by April , 1998. It is further contended that , in addition to this , the firms owened by Mr. Bhansali Group and his associates were granted 17 loans against the National Savings Certificates aggregating to Rs . 78.5 lakhs in March , 1998. It is alleged that, the aforesaid Branch of the Ist Party has not noted the lieu in respect of the National Saving Certificates with the Post Office . It is stated that , these accounts were closed on 26-3-1998 by transferring the funds from the current , deposit account . It is contended that , 3 firms belonging to Bhansali Group were granted creditfacilities to the tune of Rs . 8 lakhs which were also misutilised and all this was done with the help of the staff oftheIst Party. It is contended that, after coming to know about said irregularities the first internal investigation report dated 12th May, 1998 was put up bringing out these irregularities . Thereafter another report dated 20th May, 1998 dealing with the irregular transactions in the accounts ofthe concerned workman and Shri V.P. Popat , AELPM Operator were put up and yet another report was submitted on 23-6-1998 and the final report on 8th February , 1998. It is contended that , the investigation has fixed the accountability mainly on Mr. A.G. Vohra , the then Manager , Shri H.S. Kachare , the officer along with outsiders for these irregularities . It is contended that, the concerned workman and Shri Popat were also implicated by the Investigating Authority because their accounts were utilised for routing certain transactions and the 5319

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

No. 434739 for Rs . 25,000 from M/ s . Nagpal Transport Company and his favour and cheque was posted on 27-4-1998 and given a back dated effect of 25-4-1998 . It is also contended that, all these vouchers were posted by Shri V.P. Popat and cancelled by Shri Kachare. It is contended that, proceedings of the preliminary hearing in respect ofthe departmental enquiry against the concemed workman were held on 6th December , 2000 at Kalbadevi Branch ofthe 1st Party. It is contended that , the Presenting Officer, Enquiry Officer and the concerned workman were present in the enquiry . It is also contended that, the concerned workman was asked whether he wished to be defended by the defence representative of his choice to which he replied in positive and he was permitted to be defended at the departmental enquiry by a defence representative nominated by him . He was also allowed to cross examine the management witnesses thoroughly through his defence representative. It is stated that, the finding given by the Enquiry Officer on the basis of the evidence recorded and the Defence Representative has signed on each day's records on the enquiry proceedings on the same day itself. It is further contended that, the concerned workman was given full opportunity so the finding given by the Enquiry Officer on the basis of the evidence recorded by him cannot be perverse . It is alleged that, the decision taken by the Disciplinary Authority on the basis of the finding given by the Enquiry Officer is justand proper and does not require any interference.

5. Rejoinder is filed by the concerned workman at Exhibit 16 denying the contentions of the Ist Party and stating that, the Enquiry conducted by the 1st Party was not fair and proper and finding given by the Enquiry Officer isperverse.

6. In view ofthe above pleadings Issues were framed atExhibit 21 , Out ofthose Issues Nos . 1 and 2 were treated aspreliminary Issues which I answer as under :

ISSUES

FINDINGS

Yes 1. Is enquiry fair and proper

No 2. Is finding perverse?

REASONS:

ISSUES NOS . 1 & 2 :

7. To prove that, enquiry was not fair and proper and finding perverse concerned workman placed reliance on his affidavit filed at Exhibit 24 in lieu of his examination- in-chief where narrates the whole history which he has stated in his Statement of Claim . He referred to when he was appointed and when he was confirmed. He also referred about 5 others involved in the criminal proceedings . He further states that, how investigations in respect of others were conducted show main culprits were ignored and how he was involved in the incident . He also states that, action taken by the Management of suspension and then holding him guilty of the charges in the preliminary enquiry and then decision taken by the Management on the basis of the finding given by the Enquiry officer holding him guilty is not just and proper and perverse . In the cross he admits that , suspension allowance was paid to him when he was suspended and Union representative defended his case in inquiry . Ile states that, Enquiry Officer did not ask him whether he wants to lead evidence . He states that , he did not complained about that , with anybody . He admits that , he has not complained about the proceedings dated 22-12-2000 more precisely regarding the Question No. 3 of page 11 of Exhibit 24, Page 17 of Exhibit 22 which is regarding a che que dated 25-4-1998 of Rs . 10,000 signed by him. Even he admits that , another chequc of Rs . 7000 was also signed by him. He states that, even other two cheques are concerned with him and he admits those . Even he admits , other cheques transactions referred in page 18 to 20. He admits that, he has not complained against Mr. Kachare and Mr. Popat regarding alleged pressure by them in making transactions in his account to face the economic crisis . He admits that , he never demanded witnesses of the Management by giving application to the Enquiry Officer for cross in support of his case . Ile admits that, he has not complained to Enquiry Officer regarding witnesses called by him of Management in support of his case but were not made available by the Bank for cross .

8. On that 2nd Party filed closed his evidence and filed closing purshis at Exhibit 25.

9. Then Management filed affidavit of its witness Pradeep Dattatray Kashalkar , in lieu of his examination in chief, at Exhibit 26, who states how enquiry conducted was fair and proper . In the cross he states that , enquiry wasalso conducted against Mr. Popat . Ile admits that , in the said enquiry held Mr. Popat guilty of the charges levelled against him . He states that , said enquiry was conducted by one Mr. Kurup who appeared before him as only witness of the Management . He admits that , the Management witness who was re - examined was not offered forfurther cross to the concerned workman. Ile also admits that , the enquiry proceeding does not reveal that , enquiry proceeding was translated into Marathi and signature of the concerned workman was taken . He admits that , there was no say of the concerned workman before him on the charge sheet before he was appointed as Enquiry Ollicer and no such document came across in the enquiry showing that, opportunity was given to the charge sheeted employee to submit his say on the charges levelled against him . He admits that , the Management witness namely Mr. Kurup never worked at Jacob Circle Branch where alleged incident took place . He admits that , none of the employee of Jacob Circle Branch working during the alleged incident were brought before him and examined in 5320

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] the enquiry in respect of the charges leveled against the concerned workman . He admits that , no particular document was brought before him to conclude that, particular person has done those fictitious entries in the account of charge sheeted employce. He denies that, to save other employees , who did those fictitious entries in the computer in the Savings Bank account of the concerned workman , the concerned workman is victimized. He admits that, on every day on closing of banking transaction General Ledger Balance entries are made after tallying the entire day's transaction. He admits that, the Bank has not produced the General Ledger balance entries ofthat relevant period of the concerned Branch . He admits that, if amount is demanded without balance in the account , itis the responsibility ofthe computer operator to disallow such a withdrawal and witness volunteered that , this rule isnot applicable to all and since the concerned workman was the employee of the Bank no question arise to dishonor this type of demand . He further states that, to make back dated entries after GLP one has to use authorized password . He states that, in the said Branch right from Sepoy, Operator, Officer and Manager of the Branch all were not following the Bank rules and regulations and subsequently most of them were prosecuted and the concerned workman was one of them . He further states that , after LPG entries , for purpose ofback dated postings , authorized password is used . He admits that, the name of the computer operator was not placed before him in the enquiry who operated the Savings Bank account of the concerned workman . He admits that , the concerned workman was not involved in CBI enquiry.

10. Then 1st Party filed written arguments al Exhibit 27 which were replied by the 2nd Party at by filing written arguments at Exhibit29.

11. Here charge of serious misconduct was levelled against the concerned workman . The concerned workman states that, enquiry was not fair and proper and finding perverse .

12. Charge , as stated above , of misconduct was levelled against the concerned workman . Now, we haveto see what stand is taken by the concerned workman ? 2nd Party states that, on 6-3-1998 in the morning Staff Officer, Mr. Kachare approached Mr. Popat in the presence ofthe concerned workman and informed that Mr. Kachare was in need of Rs . 10,000 Concerned workman further states that, said Popat informed him that, he has no money to help him . Thereafter Mr. Kachare approached M/ s . Maya Enterprises and managed a cheque of Rs . 10,000, duly signed without filing in the name of Payee . 2nd Party states that , thereafter he requested the concerned workman to fill it the workman's name and deposit it in his joint SBI Account and withdraw cash from his account as Kachare informed the concerned workman that he has forgotten to. bring his cheque book . Concerned workman stated that, since Mr. Kachare was officer of the concerned werkman's

department, the concerned workman was not having any doubt about the bonafied of his transaction . He states that, since he felt that, Kachare had a genuine difficulty and that is why he agreed to follow the instructions ofMr. Kachare and accommodate him in good faith . He further tried to explained that, he deposited the cheque in his account and prepared a bearer cheque of Rs . 10,000 . He further states that, he presented the said cheque at the counter and obtained a token , which was handed over to Mr. Kachare . He states that, on the next morning Mr. Kachare gave a cash of Rs . 10,000 to the concerned workman which the concerned workman handed over to M/s.Maya Enterprises . He states that, he has deposited the transfer cheque of Rs . 10,000 on 6-3-1998 and not on 7-3-1998 as stated in the charge sheet . Then he explains that , Vanjara, AELPM , Operator , posted debit cheque No. 177980 of Rs . 10,000 first in Workman's S.B. Account instead of posting credit voucher first. He further states that, said Popat, AELPM Officer was in the habit ofposting late vouchers posted debit cheque of Rs . 10,000 ofM/s . Maya Enterprises on 7-3-1998 unauthorisedly instead of 6-3-1998 . Concerned workman states that , he is made responsible for lapses and unauthorized acts of AELPM Operators relating to the said transactions . He explains that, he paid cash to M/ s . Maya Enterprises . Then regarding second transaction concerned workman admits that, on 12-4-1998 the concerned workman was informed that, a cheque of Rs . 5000 is received in his salary account in clearing. He states that, thereafter Mr. Popat approached Mr. Sadik Garage, a client ofthe 1st Party, and managed a cheque of Rs . 5000. He further admits that , thereafter Mr. Popatinformed the concerned workman that, he did not want to route transaction through his salary account and hence he requested the concerned workman to route the transfer cheque of Sadik Garage through the account of the concerned workman and to give a transfer cheque to Mr. Popat. He further admits that, as Mr. Popat was a senior staff member the concerned workman had to concede to his request and consequently he deposited a cheque of Rs . 5000 of Sadik Garage in his account and gave a further transfer cheque to Mr. Popat. Then the concerned workman regarding transaction dated 25-4-1998 explains that, on 25-4-1998 some cheques were received in the salary account ofMr. Kachare and Mr. Popat . He statcs that, Mr. Popat had a cash of Rs. 25000 to deposit in his account to honour cheques for helping and accommodating each other. He further states that, said cheques were received through clearing around 11.30 a.m. and receipt cashier refused to accept late cash as it was Saturday working hours were from 9.00 a.m. to 11.00 a.m. and on that Mr. Popat approached M/ s . Nagpal Transport Company account holder of the 1st Party and obtained transfer cheque of Rs . 25000 in the name of concerned workman and Mr. Popat requested the concerned workman to route it through his account .

5321 [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

13. So if we read the explanation given by the concerned workman regarding these 3 transactions i.e. transaction dated 7-3-1998 of Rs . 10,000 , transaction dated 12-4-1998 regarding transaction of Rs . 5000 and transaction dated 25-4-1998 of Rs . 25000 we find that, the concerned workman has accepted that responsibility and his role and his admission to his participation in the said transaction. All this reveals that, his involvement in said transactions isnot denied by the concerned workman . Charge leveled against the concerned workman is about misconduct and explanation given by the concerned workman about these transactions reveal that, he was party to the said illegal transactions . All this admission reveals that , he was concerned with the alleged charge of misconduct leveled against him.

14. When the charges leveled against are admitted to him and though he try to give explanation in what circumstances , he acted does not permit me, to say that, the charge is bogus and fictitious one . On the contrary explanation given by the concerned workman in respect ofthese 3 transactions referred above reveal that, he was having habit of it . It reveals that, he did similar transactions onnumber ofoccasions . It reveals that , those are admitted tohim but he try to say that , to help he did all that .

decision published in 1977 ( 2) SCC page 491 given in the case of State of Haryana vs Ratan Singh of Apex Court , Judgment published in (2005) 3 SCC page 241 given in the case of Cholan Roadways Ltd. vs G.Trirugnanasam- bandam of Apex Court, Judgment published in (2006) 7 SCCpage 180 given in the case of UPSRTC vs Mthu Singh ofApex Court, Judgment published in (2003 ) 3 SCC page 583 given in the case of Lalit Popli v/s Canara Banka and ors . ofApex Court, decision published in (2006) 5 SCC page 88 given in the case of M. V. Bijlani vs Union of India and ors . , decision published in ( 1977 ) 2 SCC page 256 in thecaseofTheChairman , Board of Mining Examination & Chief Inspector of Mines and anr . vs Ramjee ofApex Court, decision published in (2000 ) 9 SCC page 327 given in the case ofUPARTC and ors . vs Ram Chandra Yadav ofApex Court, decision published in (2001 ) 1 SCC page 182 given in the case of Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd. v/s Girja Shankar Pant and ors. of Apex Court, decision published in ( 1974) 3 SCC page 103 given in the case of Banaras Electric Light & Power Ltd. vs Labnour Court II ofApex Court,decision published in (2006) 7 SCC page 212 giveń in the case of State Bank of India vs Ramesh Dinker Pünde ofApex Court, decision published in ( 2006) 6 SCC page 325 given in the case of Amrit Banaspati Co. Ltd. vs Khemchand ofApex Court , decision published in (2006) 2 SCC page 255 given in the case of TNCS Corporation Ltd. Vs. K.Meerabai ofApex Court, decision published in (2006) 1 SCC page 430 given in the case of Hombe Gowda Education Trust Vs State of Karnataka of Apex Court , decision published in (2007) 4 SCC page 669 given in the caseofCoimbatore District Central Co-operative Bank Vs. Employees' Association, decision published in (2006) 5 SCC page 207 given in the case of South Indian Cashew factories Workers Union Vs. Kerala State Cashew Development Corporation Ltd. and decision published in (2006) 2 SCCgiven in the case of L.K.Verma Vs. HMT Ltd. are to show what things are required to see in domestie enquiry and what type of evidence is required to the Inquiry Officer to give his verdict.

17. If we consider all this coupled with the case madeout by both and the law prevailing in case ofdomestic enquiry and finding given by the Enquiry Officer , i conclude that, enquiry was fair and proper and finding not perverse . So I answer these Issues to that effect and passesthe following order:

ORDER

(a) Enquiry is fair,

15. Charge of misconduct is leveled against the concerned workman and the explanation given by the concerned workman reveal that , he admitted these. misconducts . According to me evidence led by the 1st Party and the explanation given by the concerned workman and even the action taken by the 1st Party on the charges leveled against him where he tried to explain, does not require any conclusion and on the top of it finding of the EnquiryOfficer since he admitted the guilt reveals that EnquiryOfficer has reason to give finding like that . Besides when enquiry was conducted and 2nd Party participated in itandwhere there is signature ofthe concerned workman on the proceedings conducted by the Enquiry Officer . Evencopy of the Enquiry proceedings is filed by the Ist party at Exhibit 22 from pages 6 to 41 reveals that , enquiry was conducted and when 2nd Party participated in the enquiry with his representative. All this reveals that even witness were made available to the concerned workman which were examined by the Enquiry Officer. It reveals that, the finding given by the Enquiry Officer was having reason to hold the concerned workman guilty of the charges leveled against him , Besides as stated above he admitted the misconduct while giving explanation in what circumstances he did all these transactions .

(b) Finding is not perverse ;

(d) No order as to its costs .

Bombay,

A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer 16.Besides Advocate for the 1st Party placed reliance on the number of decisions viz . a decision published in AIR 1982 SC page 673 given in the case of J. D. Jain v/s . The Management of State Bank of India, a decision published in ( 1972) 4 SCC page 618 given in the case ofUnion of India vs. Sardar Bahadur of Apex Court,

2nd June , 2009 .

3175 GI/09-20 5322

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 13 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2500.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नेशनल बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , न. 2 मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 2/56/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-09 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-12012/69/2003- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]

राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th August , 2009

S.O. 2500.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 2/56/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No.2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Punjab National Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Govemment on 12-8-09 .

[No. L- 12012/69/2003 - IR(B - 11 ) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI Present : A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer

Reference No. CGIT - 2/ 56 of 2003 Employers in Relation to the Management of Punjab National Bank

The Manager ,

Punjab National Bank , Vasco-da-Gama Goa-403 802.

AND

Their Workmen

Sh . Gurudas Sadanand Borkar House No. 39 , Tailiwada

Near Narayan Temple Borim Ponda ( PO) Goa .

APPEARANCES

Forthe Employer : Mr. D.P. Karpe Advocate

For the Workmen Mr. L.V. Palekar , Advocate

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii) ] Mumbai , dated 11th June, 2009

AWARD PART- I

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its Order No.L - 12012/69/2003 - IR( B - 11 ) dated 11-09-2003 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 ( A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Punjab National Bank, Vasco Branch , Goa In discharging Shri Gurudas Sadanand Borkar , Peon from the services w.e.f. 1-10-2001 is legal and justified? Ifnot , whatrelief the workman is entitled for ?"

2. Claim Statement is filed by the Second party contending and stating that , he joined first party on 20-07-1977. Initially he was employed with New Bank of India which was amalgamated with Punjab National Bank in1993 and worked there as Peon in the Cash Section in Vasco- da-Gama Branch . According to second party, he was having unblemished record and put his dedicated service with Bank since he joined its service . Since he was posted as Peon he had to attend various kinds ofjobs . It is contented by the second party that , in the year 2001 due to frequent illness he was compelled to apply for leave time and again . He contended that , due to severe chest pain he had to remain absent from 27-4-2001 till 31-5-2001 which he informed first party . It is contended that , the reason of absenteeism was made known to first party management still , management issued charge sheet dated 6-6-2001 alleging unauthorised absenteeism during 27-4-2001 till 31-5-2001 . It is contended that , sham and bogus enquiry was initiated against him on the said charges and Inquiry Officer concluded in a single sitting holding him guilty. No proper and legal procedure was followed by Inquiry Officer and no evidence was recorded by him. Only in one sitting proceeding was initiated and concluded holding concerned workman guilty of the charge of absenteeism . It is alleged that, no opportunity was given to second party workman to appear through defence representative . So it is prayed that, the enquiry conducted with findings given be treated as illegal and decision taken by the first party of giving punishment be quashed and set aside .

3. This is disputed by the first party by filing Written Statement at Ex -9 making out case that , concemed workman Borkar was given punishment of discharge from service with benefits of superannuation which is just and proper. It is contended that, full opportunity was given to the concerned workman to reply the charge sheet . He was allowed to appear through defence representative but he did not utilise that facility . The charges against of absenteeism were levelled against concerned workman . Concerned workman admitted the guilt of absenteeism . Relying on his admission , enquiry was concluded as there 5323 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

was no point in recording evidence and prolonging it . Since concerned workman admitted the charge of absenteeism , InquiryOfficer held him guilty of charges and disciplinary authority accepted the findings of Inquiry Officer and confirmed the punishment of discharge from service awarded to concerned workman permitting him to avail benefits of superannuation . So it is stated that, enquiry was fair, proper and findings not perverse and decision takenof discharge does not require interference .

enquiry was initiated and closed on the very day . This enquiry proceeding reveals that , concerned workman signed enquiry proceeding . In the said proceeding it is mentioned that , Inquiry Officer and Management representative were present . In the said enquiry proceeding itwas mentioned that , concerned workman admitted the guilt ofabsenteeism and as such management did not lead any evidence on that account. This enquiry proceeding reveals that , relying on the admission of the concerned workman , Inquiry Officer held him guilty of charge of absenteeism and submitted his report .

4.Second party filed rejoinder at Ex- 12 stating that, enquiry was not fair and proper and findings perverse.

5. In view of above pleadings , issues are framed at Ex-30 . Out of which issues on fairness of enquiry and perversity of findings are treated as preliminary issues which I answer as follows :

Issues

Findings

Yes

(i) Is enquiry fair and proper?

(ii) Are findings of the Inquiry

No.

Officerperverse?

Reasons

Issues 1 & 2

6. Case of the second party is that , enquiry was not fairand proper vis - a- vis findings perverse. Same is disputed by the first party saying that, since second party admitted guilt ofabsenteeism and so Inquiry Officer held him guilty ofcharges.

7. To prove that, second party place reliance on his affidavitfiled in lieu ofexamination - in -Chiefat Ex -32 where he refers to his appointment and story of his sickness and alleged story of information given in that respect to the bank. However in the cross he states that, he worked with the Banks in Cash Section as Peon . He stated that he was treated by Dr. Saokar from Ponda. He states that he had givenmedical certificate to management . He states that , he was informed by the Bank by letter dated 02-07-2001 regarding enquiry which he learnt by reading of the said letter from the staff and stated that he attended the enquiry . He admits that , enquiry proceeding was explained to him. He admits that , signature was taken in enquiry.proceedings and on that he closed his evidence by filing purshis at Ex-40. Against that , first party examined one Mr. Karunakar Mahabala Shetty and Inquiry Officer Mr. M.P. Aithal by filing their affidavits at Ex -49 & 51 respectively. As per witness No. 1 , Shetty is concerned, he is not on the point of enquiry. Other witness is the one who condueted enquiry . He admits that he has not mentioned in the enquiry proceedings that, workman can represent himself though defence representative . However he states that , it was informedto concerned workman by notice dated 2-7-2001 .

9. Since concerned workman admitted the guilt on the charge of absenteeism , no question arise for the first party management to lead evidence and Inquiry Officer does not require to record any evidence to hold concerned workman guilty of charge of absenteeism . Charge was levelled against concerned workman of absenteeism between the period of 27-4-2001 to 31-5-2001 , In the claim statement concerned workman states that , he was sick duc to serious chest pain and he informed the Management . He also claim that , management was aware of it . As far as effectively informing management about his illness or as far as the fact of knowledge about the same by the management is concerned , nothing is pointed by the concerned workman to show that Management was aware of it or he informed the Management regarding the same . Here it is to be noted that , charge is of absenteeism without permission or intimation . Besides in the cross he admits that, he has no evidence to show that he had sent medical certificate to management in support of his illness . lle admits that , he received letter dated 02-07-2001 . If we pcruse said letter we can see letter is pertaining to the information given by the Inquiry Officer regarding enquiry and asking him to attend the enquiry through defence representative . Besides he admits that, he got read over said letter through staff. That means he was made aware by the Inquiry Officer that he has to attend enquiry along with hisdefence representative and he learnt it from staff who read over thatletter . Even this letter reveals that staff who read that letter was aware of that fact that concerned workman can takehelp ofdefence representative . His grievance is that, witness was not made available for cross . Since he admitted guilt, no question arises of leading evidence by the management and as such no question arises to offer witness for cross - examination . Besides by letter dated 02-07-2001 he was informed that , he can take help of defence representative , but he had not taken it . When he has admitted the guilt and when he was informed that , he can take help of defence representative , in my considered view, no substance remain in the grievance of concerned workman that procedure was not explained or he was not permitted to take help of defence representative . Besides when there is no affidavit , question does not arise to offer witness for cross . Moreover when he admitted gail !, question does not arise to record evidence by Inquiry 8. Heard both. Perused the proceedings filed at page 1 of enquiry proceedings . It reveals that, on6-6-2001 5324

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]

award

hereby

publishes

Officer and prolong the enquiry proceeding as happen generally. It was a single charge of absenteeism whichwas admitted by the concerned workman and in that scenario it was not expected by Inquiry Officer to adjourn enquiry that too for no reason.

the (Ref. No. LCA/926/2009 , IDA No. 7/03 ) of Labour Court, Aurangabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Bank of Maharashtra and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on12-8-09 .

[No. L-12025/1 /2003 -IR(B - II )]

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI P. K. SHINDE , PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, JALNA ON DEPUTATION AT AURANGABAD

10.Besides second party has not lead any evidence to prove that, he gave medical certificate to management. Evenin this proceeding he did not enjoy that facilitywhile he was examined himselfby filing an affidavit and tried to lead evidenceabout intimation given to managementwhich he alleges not considered by Inquiry Officer or management . Evenbefore this Tribunal , he did not took that opportunity and lead evidence on that point to show that he intimated to management about absenteeism or management was aware of his illness .

Ref. IDA No. 7/03

Adjudication

Between

Asstt. General Manager/

11. Charge against concerned workman is that, he remained absent unauthorisedly and according to me, the evidence discussed above was sufficient for Inquiry Officer to hold him guilty of the charge . Besides nothing is pointed out, inwhat way Inquiry Officer ought to have conducted enquiry in this situation and where opportunity was not givento concerned workman and where injustice was caused? On all these points concerned workman is silent .

Regional Manager, Bank of Maharashtra, Aurangabad-431003

1st Party

AND

Shree Neelkant N. Hire ,

Narsinha N -4 , F- 56, CIDCO,

12. If we consider all these coupled with case made outbyboth , I conclude that , enquiry is fair and proper and finding not perverse . So I answer above issues to that effect and passes the following order:

Aurangabad-431003

2nd Party ORDER

CORAM: Shri P.K. Shinde , Presiding Officer (1 ) Enquiry is fair and proper .

APPEARANCE

(2) Finding not perverse.

Shri A. R. Joshi , Learned Counsel for Ist Party. Shri Uday V. Khonde , Ld. Counsel for 2nd Party.

(3) Both parties to appear in this reference on quantum of punishment .

AWARD

Date: 11-06-2009.

(Delivered on 22-06-09)

A. A. LAD, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 13 अगस्त, 2009

1. This is a reference U/ s 10 read with Sec . 12 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred by Government of India, Ministry' of Labour, New Delhi , for adjudication of the claim in between 1st Party/employer and 2nd party/ workman.Accordingly notices were issued to both parties. The2nd party/employee submitted his Statement of Claim atExh . U - 2 and 2nd party has filed its Written Statement at Exh . C-3.

का.आ. 2501. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , औरंगाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या एल. सी. ए. /926/2009 , आई.डी.ए. नं. 7/03 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-09 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

2.Brief facts of the case of 2nd party/ worrknan are as under:

[सं. एल -12025 / 1/2009- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]

राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th August, 2009

That the 2nd party/ workman was appointed as a Clerk in the year 1982. From the date of appointment , he was continuous in the employment with the Ist Party/ employer .According to him his service record was clean and blotless . The 2nd party from time to time worked on various branches of the Ist Party employer. His work S.O. 2501. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government 5325

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

wasappreciated and awardedby Assistant Regional Manager. He never charge sheeted during his service or memo was issued to him . He was transferred at Chikalthana branch , one Mr. Datar was the incharge of the branch at that time . It is submitted by 2nd party that the behaviour of said manager was very strange against him therefore , on many occasions Mr. Datar unnecessarily warned and gave threat, but 2nd party always used to co -operate with him . Sometime in the year 1998 , 1st party has issued show -cause notice to the 2nd party/ workman and alleged that he misappropriated the amount of Rs . 94,220 by tampering withthe bank record. Accordingly , by issuing the charge sheet against 2nd party, the domestic enquiry was conducted against him. The allegations are in short as the second party misused a blank pay order with the help ofMr. Sathe & cheated the bank to Rs . 94,220. It is submitted that the branch incharge is the responsible person for this alleged whole transaction and hence to escape from it he shifted his act to 2nd party . In the enquiry, some irrelevant documents were produced and irrelevant witnesses were examined. The enquiry officer relied on the evidence of outsider namely Shri Sathe who committed fraud with the bank. It is further contended that the pay order of misappropriated amount was signed by branch manager . It is further noted that the pay order is not produced before enquiry officer. The enquiry officer has not recorded the statement of material witnesses . The matter was not handed over to the Police for further investigation . The signatures were not examined by hand writing experts . The 2nd party has cross - examined the witnesses at length . Even though , the enquiry officer has not considered the defence . The findings of enquiry officer are perverse . The enquiry officer and then Manager was biased. It is further contended that the alleged incident took place in month of March , 1996 and charge sheet was issued on 13-07-1998 and 1st Party is suspended him.w.e. f. 3-3-1998 , therefore, there is violation of principles of natural justice. The suspension allowance was also not paid throughout the suspension period . On this ground , the enquiry is vitiated , therefore the dismissal order issued by the 1st Party is illegal and liable to be set aside .

3. The Ist Party employer has filed his Written Statement at Exh . C-3 and submitted that the second partywas working as a Cierk-cum- cashier in Chikalthana branch. At the relevant time and date , second party was assigned and discharging the work ofpertaining to current and cash credit account , cashbook, general ledger, transfer scroli and the writing of head officer and local head office supplementaries . In the month of December , 1997 Mr. V. P. Kasture who was branch manager Gangapur and Mrs. P. S. Iyyer Dy . Manager , atvillage Bidkin were called on deputationby Regional

Office Aurangabad, for reconciliation of pending entries of Chikalthana branch. During conciliation , they found that certain entries and certain record of Chikalthana branch for particular dates of 30-03-1996 and 30-04-1996 ismissing. Therefore further investigation was carried out and it was found that the 2nd party has committed misappropriation and fraud of Rs . 94,220 while he was working in Chikalthana Branch . Therefore, he was placed under suspension w.e.f. 3-3-1998 and charge sheet was issued by the signatory authority dtd . 13-7-98 . The enquiry was initiated against him . The charges were serious . He has committed misappropriation and fraud ofRs . 94,220 . He prepared the fake pay order in the bank and in collusion with the one Ravindra Sathe withdrawn the amount during enquiry . The management has produced oral as well as documentary evidence . The enquiry was conducted in accordance with the principles of natural justice . Reasonable opportunity ofbeing heard was given to hím . Copies of documents and proceedings were also supplied to him . After considering oral and documentary evidence the enquiry officer has submitted enquiry report along with his finding and held that all the charges were duly proved. In view of the proved changes in the enquiry , the 1st party issued show- cause notice to him calling his reply to the show- cause notice . After considering the submission and oral , evidence documentary evidence disciplinary authority came to the conclusion that the charges of misconduct duly proved against him , the same are grave and serious and therefore the Ist Party has issued order of dismissal . It is further contended that then manager Shri Datar has no enmity with the party No. 2. The allegations are incorrect and after thought . Same are baseless . Party. No. 2 is involved in the said matter and he has committed serious misconduct and misappropriated the amount of Rs . 94,220. He has also committed unfair practice in i. 1. B. examination and changed the mark -sheet. The same misconduct is also serious . The defence of 2nd party is not acceptable. First party further contended that except the second party no other employee was involve in the said fraud . Therefore the party No.2 did not issue any charge sheet to other employees of the bank . The second party has misappropriated amount in the year 1996 and it was noticed to the bank authorities in the year 1998 during the course of reconciliation work considered, the matter was not handed over to the police. The rest allegations against the then branch manager raised by the 2nd party also are baseless and false . The hank employees are working in the financial institution are required to maintain the integrity . The 2nd party hascommitted fraud and misappropriation of the huge amount thereby he lost confidence of the first party. The punishment of dismissal awarded by the first party is proper. Hence the claim of 2nd party is liable to be rejected and reference is answered in the negative.

5326

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii)] 4. From the rival contentions of the parties by learned predecessor framed issues at Exh . 0-3 . In view of the direction given by Hon'ble High Court Judicature at Bombay bench at Aurangabad , the opportunity was given to the 1st party to prove the charges before the Court, therefore , I felt it necessary to frame this issue for adjudicating the matter . Therefore, I have framed the issue 2-A: i.e. Whether 1st party proved charges levelled against 2nd party before the Court? and I , record the findings thereon for the reasons to follow:

Issues

Findings

reported the matter to the banking authority. In order to find out truth , the Investigating team approached to one Sathe and Central bank of India branch Aurangabad and collected documents . Mr. Sathe had stated that the 2nd partyHire asked him to deposit the pay order in his account and he is requested to withdraw the amount and given to the 2nd party . The domestic enquiry was conducted. The enquiry officer recorded the statements of Mr. Sathe and investigation team and staff of the Chikalthana branch. Thereport filedby Mr. V. B. Kasture who is branch manager atGangapur and on deputation for re - conciliation of branch at Chikalthana. His report is at page no . 7 of the enquiry proceeding. It is reported that:

This issue is already decided by Judgment &Order dtd. 17-01-2008 .

1. Whether the 2nd party proves that, the enquiry conducted against him isnot fair and proper?

" ( 1 ) The pages from the transfer scroll related to date03-04-94 were missing: apparently torn off from the transfer scroll .

(2) The corner of transfer scrolls where page nos . are printed - were also torn off.

This issue is already decided by Judgement &Orderdtd . 17-1-2008 .

2. Whether the findings ofthe enquiry officer are perverse?

Inthe negative

(3) Page numbers from , 91 to 110 were also torn off from Bills payable register, pertaining to the period 18th October, 1995 to 31st March , 1996. New Bills payable register was introduced w.e.f. 03-04-96.

2-A Whether Ist party proved charges levelled against 2nd party before the Court?

Inthe affirmative

(4) The cheque returned register was also missing for the relevant period ."

3. Whether the punishment of dismissal is shockingly disproportionate?

As per final order.

Accordingly, during the investigation , it is revealed thatthe ' pay order ' is stolen from the ' pay order book ' and presented to Central bank of India Chikalthana through the account of Shri Sathe . Then he along with branch manager approached to the Central bank of India Chikalthana branch and collected the documents .

4. Whether the 2nd party entitled for the relief of reinstatement with full back wages and continuity ofservice?

5. What award?

Asper final order.

REASONS

8. In view of investigating team's report, the Ist party come to the conclusion that 2nd party is involved in the said matter , therefore, 2nd party was charge sheeted . The charges levelled against the 2nd party is reproduced as under:-

Charge no. I: You committed a fraud ofRs . 94,220 which is an act prejudicial to banks instant and isa gross misconduct , under clause 19.5 (j ) ofbipartite settlement .

5. Issues no . 1 & 2 : As the matter is remanded back bythe Hon'ble Bombay High Court, bench at Aurangabad , directing to give opportunity to Ist party to prove the charges before the Court, and accordingly, this opportunity is availed by the 1st party, therefore , issue no . 1 & 2 does not survive .

Charge no.2 : You misutilised pay leaf no. 197732 for defrauding the bank to effect of Rs . 94,220 which is an act prejudicial to bank's instant .

Charge no.3 : You tampered with bank record to conceal the above act of fraud .

Charge no . 4 : You have admitted an act of unfair , practice in 1.1.B. examination held on 18-11-1993 .

6. Issue no. 2 -A : So far as this issue is concerned, I have to see whether the 1st party proved charges levelled against 2nd party before me or not . To disprove the charges levelled against him, the 2nd party examined himself vide Ex.U - 12 . The Ist Party has adduced or evidence of Mr. Vinod Pundlik Kasture vide Ex.C- 16 , Mr. Ravindra Vinayak Sathe vide Ex.C- 17, Mr.Sudhir Vasant Datar vide Ex. C- 18 , and Mr. Prakash Ganeshrao Jahagirdar vide Ex . C-21 in support of contentions made in the written statement . Both parties filed evidence closing purshis .

7. During reconciliation in the year 1998 , the alleged fraud disclosed and accordingly , Reconciliation Officer

9. The management relied and referred the documents which are at on Ex . C-4-1 /g ( M - 11 ) is a certificate dated 27-2-98 signed by Mr. V. P. Kasture and Mr. S. A. Datar , Smt P. S. lyyar confirming that statement Exh . C -4-1 - a 5327 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मई 23 , 2009/ज्येष्ठ 2 , 1931

(M-10)was written and signed by Mr. Ravindra V. Sathe in their presence . Ex . C-4-1 /i ( M - 12 ) is a credit voucher dated 26-02-1998 shows that Rs . 1,10,000 have been deposited in A/c No. 3429 of Mr. Sathe in Central Bank of India Chikalthana Branch and said Voucher is signed and deposited by Hire . Ex.C -4/ 1 - C ( i ) (Exh. M - 13 ) is a lettter dated 1-3-1998 given by Mr. Sathe in continuation of list earlier letter dated 27-2-1998 i.e. Exh . C-4-1 -a (M - 10) . The Ex. C-4-1 /h (M- 14) is a certificate signed by Mr. V.P. Kasture and Mr. S. V. Datar ceertifying that the written statement Exh . C-4/ 1 - C (i ) ( M - 13 ) was written and signed by Mr. R.V. Sathe in their presence . Exh. C-4-1 / I ( M - 15) is a letter dated 3-3-1998 signed by Mr. D. G. Kulkarni , Mr. S. P. Umake , Mr. P. T. Moskar, Mr. P. G. Jahagirdar, Mr. S. K. Patki and Mr. A. S. Patel . According to them Mr. Hire 2nd party expressed his feeling with all staff member that fraud of Rs . 94220 done by him .

10. In the said matter , both the parties have adduced oral evidence in supprot of their respective contentions , therefore , in the light of evidence led before me , I have to see that above referred charges levelled against the 2nd party proved before me . It is admited that 2nd party was appointed as a Clerk and since then he was working in the various branches . Lastly, the 2nd party was transferredto Chikalthana branch . According to him , his past service record was blotless . It is the case of the 2nd party that the behaviour ofmanager Shri Datar was strange towards him. On 13-7-1998 , the charge sheet was issued against 2nd party alleging that he committed fraud of Rs . 94,220. It is the case of the 1st party that the 2nd party prepared fake pay order bearing no. 197732 by tampering record of the bank and he also tampered with bank record to conceal the act of fraud . Lastly, it is alleged that he committed unfair labour practice in the 1. 1. B. departmental examination held on 18-11-93.

11. In this matter , arguments advanced by both the parties are discussed in details .

Mr. A. R. Joshi , learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the 1st party submitted that in every Regional Office Local Branches Reconciliation work is being done once in 3 to 4 years. As such Mr. Kasture and Mrs. Iyyer were called on deputation at Aurangabad Regional Office in the year 1997, for carrying out Local Branches Reconciliation work on branch to branch basis , sometime in February , 1998 they found and observed that , an amount of Rs . 94,220 dtd . 3-4-1996 could not be reconciled pertaining to Chikalthana Branch and therefore , they started follow -up . They found that the vouchers dtd. 3-4-1996 were missing and Supplementary dated 13-4-1996 was not written. Therefore , it was very difficult to them to trace out this entry of Rs . 94,220 . However , during investigation , it was observed that , an amount of Rs . 94,220 was credited in the SavingAccount of Mr. R.V. Sathe in Central Bank of India, Chikalthana Branch . Therefore , they approached to said

Mr. R. V. Sathe and enquired with him. Initially, he told that he had found the cheque (pay order) in Chikalthana Bazar . However, the said story of Mr. Sathe was not probable and acceptable and therefore , Mr. Kasture , Mrs. Iyyer and Mr.Datar and other bank officials made further enquiries withMr. Sathe and persuaded him to tell the truth about the amount which was credited in his account . Thereupon Mr. Sathe narrated entire incidence . He further stated that the in- laws ( father- in- law) of Mr. Sathe and Mr. Hire belongs to the same village i.e. Budhgaon Tq. Chopda Distt. Jalgaon. The father - in - law of Mr. Hire/ 2nd party i.e. Mr. Adharrao Patil - Sonawane was having good family relations with the father- in - law of Mr. Sathe . Mr. Sathe and Mr. Hire both use to visit Budhgaon , Tq . Chopda and as such they started knowing each other and the friendship is developed between them and consequently, they became family friends . Both ofthem alongwith their family members used to visit each others residence in Aurangabad. Mr. Sathe was a poor employee working in Lupin Laboratories Ltd. Chikalthana , Sometime two years back i.e. in 1996, the 2nd party requested Mr. Sathe to help him to realize one cheque through Mr. Sathe's Account, to which Mr. Sathe agreed . Accordingly in the month of March 1996 , Mr. Hire gave one Cheque ( Pay order) of Rs . 94,220 to Mr. Sathe which was written in Sathe's name and the same was deposited by Mr. Sathe in the saving Bank Account with Central Bank of India, Chikalthana Branch . This pay order was of Bank of Maharashtra , Chikalthana Branch . An amount of Rs . 94,220 was accordingly credited in the Saving Bank Account of Mr. Sathe and immediately thereafter i.e. on 6-4-1996 Mr. Sathe gave one Cheque of Rs . 94,220 to Mr. Hire which was in the name of Mr. Hire's brother - in - iaw i.e. Mr. Anil Patil - Sonawane . Accordingly , said Mr. Anil Patil withdrawn the amount from Mr. Sathe's Account and paid it to Mr. Hire. Mr. Sathe thought that the chapter is closed . However, sometime in February, 1998 Mr. Hire again approached to Mr. Sathe and informed him that the bank officials ofBank of Maharashtra are likely to approach him andmay enquire about the amount of Rs . 94,220 . Mr. Hire further persuaded and requested Mr. Sathe to tell the false story that he found the said Cheque in Chikalthana Bazar . Mr. Hire further assured Mr. Sathe that he will arrange the amount along with interest, which in turn , will be paid by Mr. Sathe to Bank of Maharashtra so that Bank of Maharashtra will not take any further action . Mr. Hire further requested Mr. Sathe not to mention his involvement inthe matter, in presence of the bank officers . Accordingly, Mr. Hire paid an amount of Rs . 1,10,000 in cash to Mr. Sathe and it was deposited by Mr. Sathe in his account in Central Bank of India, Chikalthana Branch. At that time, Mr. Vivek (Vicky Hire ) son of Mr. Hire had accompanied Mr. Sathe in Central Bank of India and the amount deposited in the bank. The deposit slip was written by Mr. Vicky Hire and he had also signed on the said deposit slip. Said amountwas thereafter paid by Mr. Sathe to Bank 5328

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA: 21 , 1931

ofMaharashtra. Thereafter, Mr. Hire further paid interested amount to Mr. Sathe and the same is also paid and depositedbyMr. Sathe in Bank ofMaharashtra .

12. Mr. A. R. Joshi , learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the 1st party further submitted that when the bank officers enquired with Mr. Hire that his name is taken by Mr. Sathe about his involvement in the matter , at that poiont oftime, in fact, Mr. Hire had accepted , admitted and acknowledged to have misappropriated said amount through the account of Mr. Sathe . Mr. Hire also gave a statement in presence of staff members. Mr. Hire further requested not to take my disciplinary action against him. He narrated the bank officials sequence of events and the manner in which he misappropriated said amount . However, Mr. Hire has not given in writing his admission . Therefore, the bank officials got it confirmed from the record that the 2nd party committed misappropriation of amount of Rs. 94,220 .

13. The base of above referred argument of Mr. A. R. Joshi , learned Counsel for 1st party is that the statement made by Mr. Sathe dated 27-7-1998. It reveals from the cross examination of Mr. Sathe that his statement was recorded at the residential flat of Mr. Datar in presence of Mr. Kasture, Mrs. Iyyer and Mr. Mahajan . In order to through light on the conduct of Mr. Sathe , I have referred some of enquiry papers . In the departmental enquiry Mr. Sathe admitted that he was along with (Mr. Kasture, Mrs. Iyyer , Mr. Datar) on that day since about 9-00 or9-30 a.m. to 6-00 p.m. It is pertinent to note here that though Mr. Sathe wrote that letter in the flat of Mr. Datar, but he addressed the said letter to Branch Manager . The wording itselfshows that this letter mightbe dictatedby some body andMr. Sathejust write down it as it is . On the contrary, in the cross examination before the Couirt, he admitted that he was along with Mr. Kasture , Mrs. lyyer, Mr. Datar only upto writing of statement . In respect ofpay order , he firstly stateed that he found one cheque in the ChikalthanaBazar and in another place , he made statement that on the say of 2nd party he told that he found cheque in the Chikalthana Bazar. In the cross examination 2nd party Counsel gave three suggestions in respect ofdetails of bnank account (which is in existence in the Central Bank of India) to Mr. Sathe . In reply, he stated that he dues not know that how the said amount is creditedin his account Here it is to be noted that Mr. Sathe is a person who is remembering every aspect of sequence of franud, but he unable to say about entry ofhuge amount in his pass book. I have said it huge amount because Mr. Sathe admitted in the cross examination that he was working as a labourer in Lupin Laboratories and at the relevant time , he was earning upto Rs . 8000 per month. On the material point i.e. writing of letters, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of 2nd party suggested Mr. Sathe that how many letter were written by him on 27-2-1998 . Mr. Sathe replied that he might be written about two letters . Mr. Sathe further exactly does not knowwhether letter which is at Ex. C- 15/6 was written

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] either in his own house or at the residence of 2nd party. I have also noticed that though Mr. Sathe educated upto Graduate i.e. B.A. but he does not know difference in between pay order and cheque . Not only this , but Mr. Sathe also does not know full name of 2nd party , and whether his salary account was with the Central Bank of India or not . It would not be out of place to mention here thatMr. Sathe was working in the Lupin Laboratories in the year 1998. The alleged incident is detected in the year 1998 also . At the time ofbreafing the examination -in -chief in the year 2009 , He stated entire episode to the Ist party. Counsel , but he is unable to tell whether hiş salary account waswith the Central Bank of India or not . Considering his above discussed changed versions from time to time , and answers to the suggestions givenby 2nd party's Counsel , Idonot feel that Mr. Sathe is trustworthy witness , therefore, story put forth by Mr. Sathe is not reliable hence argument advanced in this respect on behalf of the 1st party is rejected.

14. Mr. A.R. Joshi , learned Counsel appearing on behalf ofthe Ist party submitted that Mr. Hire was working on current Cash Credit in Chikalthana Branch as a Clerk and hewas handling Current Cash Credit Subsidies , Cash Book, General Ledger, Transfer Scroll and bills payable etc. on Current Cash Credit Table .

15. It is furhter submitted that the entries of cash book dated 3-4-1996 were taken including the entry of disputed amount total worth of Rs . 1,76,142 against the heading of' Local Branches . ' The amount shown in Local BranchHead also includes disputed amount of Rs . 94,220 . In this respect the 1st party witness Shri Kasture admitted that the document Ex . C - 15 / 1 is the extract of cash book . The entry amount of Rs . 1,76,142 dated 3-4-1996 is pertaining to Local Branches under the head of local branch . The said entry based on subsidiary or total of the vouchers . ConcernedOfficer verified and checked entries . He further admitted that Mr. Datar signed on cash book. Mr. Datar checked and verified debit and credit entries of the said cashbook. He further admitted that in the said cash book. inthe column of ' prepared by ' no signature is found . It is evident from the admissions of the Ist party witness that Mr. Datar is involved in the matter , who checked and verified debit and credit entries of the said cash book . In the cross examination Mr. Datar admitted that on debit under local branch head there is entry of Rs . 1,76,142 which ismarked by me star. There is no specific evidence onwhat date he is marked it as star or not . I am also unable to understand when Mr. Datar marked the said entry as star, why at that times , he did not verify it immediately or atleast second day. Being a branch manager he failed to take follow-up and rectify it or he should report such matter tothe superior, but till 1998 i.e upto reconciliation he did not open his mouth .

16. It is furhter argued by learned Counsel appearing onhehalf of the 2nd party Shri Uday V. Khonde that being [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

branch manager and authorized signatory to issue pay orderand cleared the pay order , Mr. Datar was responsible . The said Datar was directly involved in the fraud. I have gone through the examination- in - chief ofMr. Datar. In the examination in chief Mr. Datar stated that in the cashbook page of3-4-1996 the debit entry of Rs . 1,76,142 under LHO Head isunticked and marked, as the supplementary book ofLHO and the vouchers were not shown while checking cash book by Shri . N. N. Hire. Shri N. N. Hire was asked to write the supplementary book and show the vouchers for checking of cash book . Even after reminders , he did not write the supplemtary. The examination - in-chief of Mr. Datar before the Court goes to show that he is making the said statement without any documentary evidence after 8 to 9 years from the date of notice ofalleged fraud . He did not file any memo or warning issued to Mr. Hire in respect ofreminder ofwriting of supplementary etc.

17. The learned Counsel of 1st party further submitted that Mr. Hire managed to take out blank pay orderbearing No. 197732 sometime in the month ofMarch 1996 and thereafter, it was given by him to Mr. Sathe by putting name of Mr. Sathe on it. He further argued that the amount of Rs . 94,220 was written on the said pay order and the bogus signature of authorized official were put on the said pay order . Said pay order was received for clearing on 30-3-1996 in Chikalthana branch which was again received by Mr. Hire and he had himself passed said pay order(without any authorization ) and subsequently it was credited in the account of Mr. Sathe in Central Bank of India, Chikalthana Branch . Mr. Hire did not write supplementary dated 3-4-1996.

18. I am not agree with the submissions made by learned Counsel Shri A. R. Joshi that the pay order No. 197731 was written by Mr. Hire , and therefore, he was also written the disputed pay order No. 197732. Though, earlier or subsequent pay order was in the hand writing of Mr. Hire, it does not mean that he has written disputed pay order . It is also not acceptable that on the disputed pay order Mr. Hire made bogus signature of authorized official . It is pertinent to note here that disputed pay order was not produced on record as it is missing. It is further alleged that the said pay order was received for clearing on 30-3-1996 in Chikalthana branch which was again received by Mr. Hire and he had himself passed said pay order(without any authorization) and subsequently it was credited in the account of Mr. Sathe in Central Bank of India, Chikalthana Branch . Mr. Hire did not write supplementary dated 3-4-1996 . In this regard, to my opinion, and it is rightly subinitted by learned Counsel Shri U.V. Khonde, that the said allegations are not proved by 1st party, because its witness Mr. Kasture made it clear in his cross examination that only one person do not use to handle bank transactions . I am reproducing relevant portion ofMr. Kasture's cross -examination which reads as under:

3175G1/09-21

5329

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

"20. Ex. C-4/ 1-e is credit advice . The said document shows the amount of credit advice passed in favour of City Branch by Chikalthana Branch for inward clearing cheques . The said creditadvice is prepared by Aurangabad City Branch. The figure mentioned in the said credit advice is the total instruments amount . It is correct to say that after verifying the amount of instruments total amount was written in the credit advice. The manager or officer of the Chikalthana branch or concerned cleark also verifies the total amount of instruments as per credit advice . Some of the staff of City branch signed on the said credit advice . It is correct to say that the responding officer ofCityBranch has signed this document. Authorised officer of Chikalthana Branch has signed on this credit voucher after realization of cheque of inward clearing instruments . Authorised official after confirming that instruments are passed then he signed on advice . Mr. Jahagirdar signed as authorised official . The disputed amount of Rs . 94,220 is included in the credit advice amount , It is correct to saythat the responding official and authorized official after verifying the instrument signed on the credit advice . "

19. The learned counsel appearing for the 2nd party Shri . U. V. Khonde submitted that the 2nd party has not admitted hand writing of some of documents . Opinion of handwriting expert was not called . The documents which were sent for investigation to the expert . The expert has reported that the hand writing is not of same with the hand writing ofMr. Hire . In order to establish the fraud, relevant documents were not sent for examination .

20. The 2nd party filed documents i.c. expert opionion of Mr. N.R. Parik, Examiner of Disputed Documents,Aurangabad vide Ex. U -14/8 . I have considered the document Ex . C- 20 / 1 . ( M- 6 ) in the light of expert opinion . It is alleged by 1st party that in order to conccal the adjustment, he made a fake entry in cheque returned register indicating cheque No. 4125993 drawn by Shivdasta Auto was returned unpaid on 3-4-1996.

21. (Ex. C-4/1 - F) ( M -7) and M- 31 (Transfer Scroll of Chikalthana Branch ) and M -21 (Answer Sheet of Bank Examination ), is that he is unable to express any definite opinion as regards the identity or otherwise ofthe disputed writing in respect of above referred exhibited documents on account of considerable disguise in the disputed writings.

22. It is further argued that the second party has no concern with the said documents . He had not signed the said document nor prepared . In view of expert opinion , I have accepted the argument advanced by 2nd party.

5330

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

23. It is argued on behalf of 2nd party that the then manager Mr. Datar was responsible for the said fraud. therefore , to escape . from the responsibility he managed to Mr. Ravindra Sathe and assured him that the management will not file FIR against him in the Police, ifhe would state the name of2nd party and his involvement in the fraud. Accordingly, the statement of said Mr. Sathe was recorded in presence of the then manager Shri Datar . It is further argued that as per assurance Shri Datar managed to pay amount to Shri Sathe and in order to show involvement of Mr. Hire, he put the signature of son of second party on the deposit slip . It is admitted that Mr. Sathe's statement was recorded in presence of Mr. Datar . It is pertinent to note that being a branch manager , and authorized signatory of pay order his involvement in the fraud cannot be ruled out , because every transaction in the bank could not be managed by one person, as it is a team work .According to argument of Ist party, Mr. Hire (i.e. 2nd party) is brilliant one and he didthis fraud in planned manner, but when the fraud came in the light in the month of Feb. , 1998 Mr. Hire/2nd party deposited Rs . 1,10,000 in the account of Shri Sathe on 26-2-1998 . I am unable to understand, if it is accepted that Mr. Hire is brilliant , as argued by 1st party, then how it is expected from Mr. Hire that he will allow his son to put signature on deposit slip which is at Ex. C-41/i . For this reason and as Mr. Vivek alias Vikky son of 2nd party did not examine before me , therefore , the argument advanced by Ist party in this respect is required to be rejected.

24. It is also argued on behalf of 1st party that Mr. Sathe paid the amount of Rs . 94,220 to Shri Anil Patil, butthe Ist party did not , examine Mr. Anil Patil before the Court, therefore , I am rejecting the said argument of I st party also.

25. It is the case of the 1st party that the relevant record was missing and alleged that the 2nd party took fake entry in the name of Shivdatta agencies . The said entry is at Exh . M -9 of enquiry papers filed below Exh . C-4/page No. 21. It reveals from said entry that the entry is in respect of cheque of Rs . 94,220 issued by Ravindra Sathe in favour of Anil Patil . Mr. Anil Patil is not examined before me . It is not ascertained from Ex . M -9 (Ex. C -4/21 ) that the said amount was received by 2nd party. In the examination - in- chief Mr. Sathe stated that I handed over one cheque of Rs . 94,220 and on 6-4-1996, the 2nd party withdrawn amount ofRs . 94,220 from my account with the help of Anil Adhar Patil , who was at the relevant time residing with 2nd party . In short , from the version of Mr. Sathe , it is evident that Mr. Hire did not receive amount . I have also gone through the report of Investigating Officer, wherein , it is mentioned that " The amount was withdrawn by Mr. Hire with the help of pass book . " But from the Ex . M -9, it is clear that the said amount was not received by Mr. Hire. In the said circumstances , it can be said that the 1st party has made contradictory statements from time to

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] time in respect of name of withdrawer ofamount. Therefore, the allegation that the 2nd party prepared fake pay order and deposited it in the account of Ravindra Sathe and Ravindra Sathe paid the said amount to the party No. 2 is not acceptable .

26. It is argued by 2nd party Counsel that Ex . C-4/ 21 ( M-9) is the cheque of Central Bank of India bearing account No. 3429. In the front side , there is signature of Mr. Sathe and in the back of said cheque there are two signatures ofMr. Sathe .According to Statement ofAccount ofCentral Bank of India said amount is received by Mr. Sathe . During the enquiry , the bank has recorded the evidence of employee of Central Bank of India . I am reproducing his examination - in - chief as under :

" I recognise the documents shown to me Ex. M -8 which ispay - in-slip of our Bank . The contents ofEx. M-8 are correct . The Ex. M- 8 Pay- in- slip is signed bythe Depositor. I recognise Ex . M - 9 shown to me is a cheque of our branch . The cheque is drawn by Mr. Sathe for withdrawing amount from his a/ c . " The above referred Examination - in-Chief goesto show that only depositor of cheque was received said amount of Rs . 94,220 .

27. It is alleged by the 1st party that Mr. Hire through Mr. Sathe, vide Ex. C-41 /i , deposited amount ofRs . 1,10,000 in the Central Bank of India in order to pay misappropriated amount to the 1st party/Bank . It is further alleged that while depositing the said amount , Mr. Vickky Hire who is son of 2nd party was accompanied Mr. Sathe and Mr. Vickky signed on pay slip which is at Ex . C- 4-1 /i . Admittedly, Mr. Vickky Hire is not examined before the Court, therefore, it is difficult to accept that Mr. Vickky signed on Ex. C-4-1/i .

28. The documents Ex . M - 9 ( Ex . C-4/21 ) & Ex. C-4-1 / i belongs to Central Bank of India , and there is no sufficient evidence to held that the said documents arc sufficient tohold that the 2nd party has concern with the said documents . I have held that the amount was not received by 2nd party.

29. It is submitted by 2nd party that there is no documentary evidence on record to establish that he has committed fraud and misappropriated the amount as alleged against him.

30. It is submitted by the Ist party that while the investigation in respect of the amount of Rs . 94,220 was going on in the year 1998 by Mr. Kasture and Mrs. Iyyer at that time Mr. Datar was posted at Thane. The said incident ofmisappropriation had occurred in the year 1996 whenMr. Datar was also working in the branch. However, in the year 1998 when the investigation was going on all other staff members except Mr. Datar were available in the branch , and therefore , Mr. Kasture had requested 5331 भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931-

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

noticed the suspicious entry and marked it as star, but failed to bring it notice to his superior officers . It is discussed earlier that though bank defrauded for huge amount, but 1st party officer failed to file report in police station to investigate into the matter . Therefore , it will risky to accept the contentions advanced on behalf of Ist party in the facts and circumstances of the case.

Mr. Datar to assist them in the investigation. Being the senior employee of the bank Mr. Datar was duty bound to assist the invsetigation team and he effectively and successfully assisted in finding out the real culprit i.e. Mr. Hire who had done the misappropriation through Mr. Sathe's account . Therefore , Mr. Hire had obviously developed a personal bias and grudge against Mr. Datar . It is submitted that the bank did not think it necessary to examine Mr. Datar as their witness in the deparetmental enquiry, and therefore, Mr. Hire who is very intelligent had grabbed this opportunity to make hue and cry against Mr. Datar and he could also create doubtful atmosphere about the alleged involvement of Mr. Datar. However, it is important and pertinent to note here that the bank has rectified its mistake and examined Mr. Datar as its witness before the Court . The evidence of Mr. Datar is not discarded by 2nd party.

34. In this matter, 1 have noticed from overall pleading, documents , and notes of arguments that the 1st party has given much importance and their whole story is encircled with the fact that there is family relationship in between Mr. Sathe and Mr. Hire . It is to be noted that the bank could not bring the direct evidence to show that the said fraud is committed by Mr. Hire , therefore , the bank collected information and created scene like family relation of Mr. Hire with Mr. Sathe . The 2nd party refused relationship with Mr. Sathe . It is argued by 1st party that 2nd party could not bring any evidence on record even remotest possibility of any connection of Mr. Sathe with Mr. Datar , but Mr. Datar , in his cross examination of para No. 25, fairly admitted that "My house is situated near to the House of Sathe " In view of admission of Mr. Datar , I am not accepting the contention of Ist party, as discussed above.

31. I am not agree with the submission made on behalf of the 1st party by the Learned Counsel Shri . A.R. Joshi because , it is to be noted that when any investigation is at the primary stage and investigating team did not come any conclusion in respect of exact involvement and therefore , there is suspicious atmosphere in that event it isnot expected from Investigation Team to take help from the person who was related with the misappropriation . It is pertinent to note here that the documents vide Ex . C-4/ 1 - a, Ex. C-4 / 1 - c is signed and certified by Shri S.V. Datar though he was at the relevant time (during 1996-97) Branch Officer of Chikalthana Branch , Aurangabad and while he made signatures on the above certificates he was posted at Thane branch . It appears from documents on record, as soon as Investigation Team initiated enquiry he immediately involved in the enquiry .

35. Here, assuming for the sake of argument that there are family relation in between 2nd party and Mr. Sathe , but it does not mean that except Mr. Hire , one cannot establish relation with Mr. Sathe . It would not be outofplace to mention here that in order to commit fraud , it is not necessary that there must be friendship , family relationship , etc. , etc. , and I think that there are no fixed parameter to built up relation with any person , the only thing is required to grab money by hook or crook . So also I do not think that Mr. Hire who was clerk and in the hierarchy ofbank, the person like 2nd party can create that much influence to believe and act upon him . Therefore , 1 rejectthe contention of Ist party that in view of relation in between Mr. Sathe and 2nd party , Mr. Sathe acted upon the instruction of Mr. Hire/2nd party.

32. During the course of argument Shri . Udav V. Khonde Learned Counsel for 2nd party argued that being Authorized Signatory ofpay order, Mr. Datar is liable for consequences as his involvement was serious kind of crime which resulted into misappropriation , therefore, in order to avoid further complication like police custody of Mr. Sathe and himself he gave promise , threat, also used undue influence upon Mr. Sathe and compel him to state the name of Hire. He further argued that accordingly he managed to the investigating officer and compel them not to file F. I. R. in police station and succeed to keep away himself from every responsibility.

36.One important aspect is required to be considered that Mr. V. B. Kasture had stated that he along with Datar went to the house of Sathe and assured him that they will not prosecute against him , if he states the truth and also assured by keeping away from the 2nd party. Then he made confessionary statement and alleged that the 2nd party Hire has asked him to deposit his cheque in his account . In this circumstance , under the threatening of police case, or in order to avoid police custody or otherwise Mr. Sathe could have told name and shown involvement of2nd party in the alleged incident.

37. I have carefully perused documents referred above in para No.08 minutely. In respect of charges No. 1 , 33. In the background of above argument I have observed that though, Mr. Datar was authorized signatory and then branch manager , but as discussed above the statement of Mr. Sathe was recorded in presence of Mr. Datar. It is strange to note that and it is frankly stated by the 1st party that the bank did not feel it necessary to record statement of Mr. Datar in the enquiry and by recording his statement before the Court, the bank rectified its mistake . I have held above that though Mr. Datar 5332

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/ BHADRA 21 , 1931

2and3, it is alleged that 2nd party misutilized pay order no . 197732 and thereby defrauded the bank for the amount of Rs. 94,220 and committed fraud also tampered with bank record. It is to be noted that said pay order is not produce onrecord. Therefore, it is difficult to accept the contention that2nd party stolen the pay order from bank and put the signature of Br. Manager and misused it from the record . In this matter adinittedly, the bank has not examined custodian of record , and there is no evidence to show that pay order is stolen away by 2nd party. I have observed that in the Inward clearing dated 30-3-96 of Chikalthana adjusted on 3-4-96 . There were 9 instruments for Rs: 1,34,114.55 lodged by Central Bank of India, Chikalthana including a pay order No. 197732 for Rs . 94,220 collected in savings account No. 3429 of Mr. Ravindra Sathe . It is discussed above that the 2nd party was not authorized signatury. Mr. Datar was the authorized signatory for clearing and adjust and allow to collect amount after verifying the signature below instrument and 2nd party allotted' work pertaining to current , cash credit account , bill , cash book ledger , transfer scroll etc. In fact, in absence ofpay order dated 03-04-1996 one cannot imagine that it bears fake signature of authorized signatory and it was misutilized by Mr. Hire as alleged .

38. It is submitted by 2nd party Counsel that there is docuntent filed by Ist party below Ex.C-4/ 1/ f in order to show that this document pertaining to LBRC Subsidiary , and Mr. Hire failed to write said LBRC Subsidiary . Ifthis document perused minutely , there appears " LBRC " heading in hand written. In fact , it is printed form which is used for Central Office Subsidiary . He further argued that the Ist party witness Mr. Kasture admitted in his , cross- examination that " Saidapur " is not come within the local area and said document pertaining to Central Office . In view of this , I accepted the argument of Mr. Khonde , learned Counsel for 2nd party that in order to show that Mr. Hire did not write Subsidiary bank falsely fled this document on record .

39. The document Ex . C - 4 / 1 - c is the certificate dtd . 4-3-1998 filedby 1st party stating that on the relevant dates i.e.03-04-1996 and 04-04-1996 2nd party did the work onCurrent cash credit : The certificate is issued by Branch Manager. It is pertinent to note that though the bank witness stated that the bank used to maintain work distribution register and I have called said record from bank for verification; but bank failed to produce it on record. In the said circumstances, the contents of certificate is not accepted:

40. It is argued on behalf of the second party that though bank witness Mr. Jahagirdar before the Court in his examination- in - chief stated that the document Ex .

[PART 11-SEC.3( ii ) ] C-15/7 in the hand writing of Mr. Sathe and he identify his hand writing and signature , but in the cross -examination headmitted that " I do not know about Mr. Sathe . I nevermel him at any time, Mr. Sathe never written any letter before me . " The said admission in the cross examination establishes that the bank created documents against 2nd party.

41. It is argued by Mr. A.R. Joshi Learned Counsel for the 1st partythat on 03-03-1998 when the suspension order was served to Mr. Hire he expressed his desire to talk with all staff members and therefore , the Branch Manager called all staff members in his cabin and confessed/admitted of having done misappropriation of Rs . 94,220 by using pay order . He further admitted that he was the alone person involved in the said misappropriation and he further stated that he has repaid the amount to the bank with interest by obtaining staff society loan. It is submitted that this oral admission ofMr. Hire was put in writing by the then Branch Manager Shri . D.G. Kulkarni by addressing letterdtd . 03-03-1998 to the Chief Manager , Bank of Maharashtra Aurangabad Region . This letter is signed by all six staff members . This letter is duly proved by the bank in the enquiry as well as before this Court. He also submitted that the bank has examined one of the signatory of the letter Mr. P.G. Jahagirdar . Mr. Hire could not disprove the said letter nor he could prove as to why all staff members should make false allegations against Mr. Hire . In the background ofabove submission on behalf of the Ist party I have gone through the cross examination of Mr. Jahagirdar in which he admitted that

" I do not remember whether Mr. Hire visited Chikalthana branch after his suspension i.e, after March 1998. Now I am shown Ex. C- 4/ 1 -e, I do not remember in whose hand writing the said document was written . I do not remember at the time of document was reduced in writing Mr. Datar was present or not. I signed on the said document on my table.

From the admission of Mr. Jahagirdar , I am not inclined to accept the argument advanced by Ist party Counsel.

42. It is alleged by the Ist party that an amount of Rs . 21,000 was given by Shri Hire 2nd partyto Mr. Sathe for depositing towards the interest on the amount of Rs. 94,220 , but this fact is also not supported with other documentary evidence . There are other allegations against the 2nd partr i.e. manipulation ,destruction of record and torn of voucher dated 3-4-96 and papers of transfer scroll register. From the evidence on record 1 do not find any evidence that 2nd party manipulated and destructed record or torn ' voucher or papers or transfer scroll . Without any 5333

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

cogent evidence, I am rejecting these allegation which are levelled against 2nd party . It is admitted position on record thatconcerned custodian is not examined before me .

43.The learnedCounsel appearing on berhalf of the Istparty relied the ruling reported in case of Nirajkumar V/sUnion of India 2008(2) Mh . L. J. page no . 61. The ratio is reproduced as under :

Petitioner allegedly withdrew money from account ofothers while working in ATM cell of the Bank- In the departmental enquiry , the petitioner was granted fair opportunity- Withdrawal of money from the account of others is a serious matter-Sufficient evidence to establish charges on the basis of preponderance of probabilities- Relationship of the bank and its customer is relationship of great faith-Punishment of dismissal from service not disproportionate.

44. From the evidence on record, it is proved that the .charges levelled against the 2nd party are not proved before me. Shri A.R. Joshi Adv. for 1st party relied ruling of Hon'ble Apex Court in case of U. P. State Road Transport V/ s VinodKumar reported in 2008 (2) Mh. L. J. page 161 wherein, it is held that when employee found guilty of misappropriation of funds . Court should not be reluctant to reduce the punishment on misplaced sympathy for a workman . That there is nothing wrong in the employer losing confidence , of faith in such an employee awarded punishment of dismissal . In such cases , there is no place ofgenerality or sympathy or the part of Court to interfere in the quantum of punishment.

45. He also relied on the ruling reported in case of Niraj Kumar Vs. Union Bank of India , reported in 2008 (2) Mh. L. J. page 61 .

that charge no . 04 regarding the malpractices in the departmental examination is proved against him . He further admitted in the cross examination that he did not challenge the finding recorded by my learned Predecessor before appropriate forum . In the case in hand, allcgations of fraud andmisappropriation are not proved as discussed above , except charge no . 4 i.e. committing unfair practice . in 1. I. B. departmental examination therefore, finding to that extent become final. Therefore , question of grant of back wages does not arise . It is pertinent to note here that all the witnesses of bank has stated that the 2nd party rendered blotless servicewith the bank . It is pertinent to note that to make an Audit from time to time to reconcil its transaction ispart and parcel of institution . In this matter , though , the bank has made its audits from time to time , but the alleged fraud was not disclosed in those audit . I have considered this factor seriously while considering the contentions of Istparty. It is apparent that the 1st party did not ask any explanation to other employees except 2nd party, under the guise that 2nd party confessed his guilt before Branch Manager. In the above circumstances , the charges levellcd against the 2nd party are not proved, therefore , I hold that order ofpunishment of dismissal is unfair labour practice , illegal and therefore , required to be set aside . No doubt , the employer is liberty to impose any other punishment other than the dismissal , for the charge No. 4. The 2nd party adduced his evidence and stated that he is only earning hand in his family. His parents depends on him . 1 do not find substance in the contentions made in respect ofhisunemployment . No supporting evidence is produced on record to show that he was unemployed since long, therefore, I am denying the back wages . In . the above facts and circumstances , 1 answer issue no . 2 - A to 04 accordingly and proceed to pass following order;

ORDER

I. Reference is answered partly in the affirmative .

I have gone through the citations . It appears that in boththe matter charges of fraud and misappropriation was established they found guilty of charges levelled against employee . Therefore, Hon'ble Supreme Court held that in such circumstances the Court should not reluctant to reduce, the punishment on misplaced sympathy.

2. The dismissal order dated 7-2-1999 issued by ist party is set aside by giving an opportunity to award any other lesser punishment than dismissal for proved misconduct , as discussed above .

46.The learned Counsel appearing for the 2nd party relied on ruling reported in 2005 ( I ) Bom L.C. 606 in case of Management of Madurantakam Co- operative Suger Ltd. , Versus S. Viswanathan .

3. The Ist party is directed to reinstate the 2nd party on previous post as he was on the date 7-2-1999 with continuity ofservice but without backwages.

No order as to costs . 4.

5. The Award be sent for publication and for necessary action to Under Secretary , Government ofIndia Ministry of Labour, New Delhi .

The some and substance of above referred case is thatwhen there is no corroborative material evidence on record to prove allegation, order of reinstatement held justified. In the case in hand , the Ist party/employer could not establish allegations and could not brought material evidence on record to prove the allegations against 2nd party.

Date: 22-6-2009

Place: Aurangabad .

P.K. SHINDE , Presiding Officer 47. It is admitted by the 2nd party that though by an Judgment andOrderdtd . 24-04-2008, it is held by this Court 5334

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/ BHADRA 21 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 13 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2502.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ बडौदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 17/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-09 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -12011/ 102/2008 - आई आर ( बी- II ) ]

राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 13th August , 2009

S.O. 2502.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 17 / 2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Bank of Baroda and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 12-8-09 .

[No. L- 12011 /102/2008 - IR(B - II ) ]

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW Present : N.K. PUROHIT , Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 17/2009

Ref. No. L- 12011 / 102/2008- IR ( B- II) dated : 17-6-2009

Between

The General Secretary

Bank ofBaroda Staff Association , 15/222 A, Madhav Bhawan, CivilLines , Kanpur (Espousing cause of Shri Lal Mani )

AND

The Assistant General Manager

Bank of Baroda Regional Office , 11th Floor 19 Way Road, Lucknow

AWARD

17-7-2009 1. By order No.L - 12011 / 102 /2008- IR ( B - II ) dated: 17-6-2009 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour , New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A ) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute between the General Secretary, Bank of Baroda Staff Association , 15/222 A , Madhav Bhawan , Civil Lines , Kanpur (Espousing cause

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) | ofShri Lal Mani ) and the Assistant General Manager , Bank ofBaroda , Regional Office, 11th Floor, 19 Way Road, Lucknow for adjudication .

2. The reference under adjudication is :

"Whether the action of the management of bank of Baroda in imposing the punishment of " be brought down to lower stages in the scale of pay by one stage with cumulative effect" on Shri Lal Mani sub- staff is legal and justified ? To what relief the concerned workman is entitled ? "

3. On receipt of the reference order the workman was issud notice to file his statement of claim complete with relevant documents , list of reliance and witnesses before Tribunal on 17-7-2009 with advance copy to the opposite party. The workman , Lal Mani appeared in person with the authorized representative of the union on the date fixed and filed an application ( W- 3 ) wherein it has been prayed to withdraw the case . The authorized representative of the workman's union in his application has submitted that the management of the bank has imposed punishment of warning upon workman , modifying the proposed punishment , vide final order dated 27-9-2008 and being satisfied with the order dated 27-9-2008 the workman's union does not want to contest the present industrial dispute any more . Accordingly, it has been prayed that the present dispute be stood withdrawn , as not pressed and appropriate orders may be passed.

4. It is well settled that if a party challenges the legality of an order , the burden lies upon him to prove illegality of the order and if no evidence is produced the party invoking jurisdiction of the Court must fail . In the instant case the burden was on the workman's union to set out the grounds to challenge the validity of the action ofthe management of Northen Railways in imposing the punishment of " Be brought down to lower stages in the Scale of pay by one stage with cumulative effect " on the workman by filing its statement of claim and to prove the said action is illegal and unjustified . The workman's union has not filed its statement of claim . Moreover , the representative of the workman's union has reguested for leave ofthe Tribunal to withdraw the case vide application dated 17-7-2009 ( W - 3 ) , stating therein that the concerned workman has been imposed punishment of warning upon him, modifying the proposed punishment and being safisfied with the punishment order , the concerned workman , does not want to contest the case any more as his grivances stands redressed . Accordingly , the representative of the workman's union has prayed to pass suitable orders .

5. Inview of the submission of the workman's union for withdrawal of the case , there is no grievance left with the workman and concerned workman union . Resuliantly, no relief is required to be given to the workman concerned . The reference under adjudication is answered accordingly.

6. Award as above .

N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer Lucknow 17-7-2009 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

5335.

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

नई दिल्ली, 13 अगस्त , 2009

का.आ. 2503.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इलाहाबाद बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाटं ( संदर्भ संख्या 240/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-09 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [सं. एल-12012/40/2000- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th August , 2009 S.O. 2503.-in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.240/2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No.1 , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Allahabad Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Govemment on 12-8-09 .

[No. L- 12012/ 40/2000- IR(B- II) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE BEFORE LOKADALAT CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. -L, DHANBAD

In the matter of a reference U/ s . 10( 1 ) (d ) (2A) ofI.D. Act .

Reference No. 240 of 2000

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Allahabad Bank.

AND

Their Workman

Present : Shri H. M. Singh , Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES

Shri J. Patra , Senior Manageı .

Forthe Employers : For the Workman : Shri B.K. Pal , General Secretary of the sponsoring union .

State : Bihar

Industry: Bank

Dated, the 21st July, 2009

AWARD

By Order No.L - 12012 / 40/ 2000 - IR (B - II ) dated 22-8-2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

"Whether the action of the management of Allahabad Bank in denial of promotion from sub- ordinate cadre to clerical cadre to the workman , Shri Ram Niwas Kharwar , Bagaon Branch , Dist . Sitamarhi isjustified? Ifnot, what relief the workman is entitled for ?"

2. Inthis reference case Shri J. Patra, Senior Manager , appearing on behalf of the management , submitted that the concerned workman has been promoted and by filing an application prayed to close the case .

Sri B.K. Pal , General Secretary of the sponsoring union also filed a petition by praying for closure of the dispute since the dispute has been settled .

3. Inviewofthe submission made by both the parties, I render a ' No Dispute Award ' in the present reference case.

H.M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली , 13 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2504.औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार विजया बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 1/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-09 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -12011/57/ 2008 - आई आर ( बी -11 ) ]

राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th August , 2009

S.O. 2504.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.1 /2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Vijaya Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Governrnent on 12-8-09.

[No. L- 12011 / 57/2008-1R( B - II ) ]

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Friday, the 10th July, 2009

Present: A.N. JANARDANAN

PresidingOfficer Industrial Dispute No. 1/2009

(In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of 5336

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009 /BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Vijaya Bank and their Workman)

BETWEEN

: I Party/Petitioner

TheRegional Secretary

Vijaya Bank Worker's Organisation

60/2, Big Street, Triplicane Chennai-600005

Vs.

II Party/Management

The General Manager

Vijaya Bank , 123 , Marshalls Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600008

APPEARANCE

Forthe Petitioner : Smt . R Shakeela, Authorised Representative

For the Management : Sri Ranjit , Authorized

Representative

AWARD

expenses on pro- rata basis . What Desai Award concluded is that the uniform rate of medical expenses cannot be provided . On the basis of Bipartite Settlement dated 19-10-1966, IBA under circular dated 22-04-1968 made clear that temporary employees are entitled to medical aid and expenses but the same is denied to them , Thereupon the ID arose which was eventually referred as the present one. The denial is unlawful and in contravention of the awards and bipartite settlements . There is no bar for temporary employee'sentitlement to the same . Despite IBA having persistently stood for such extension of medical facility to temporary employees it was not considered favourably by the Desai Tribunal with reference to the query and reply at Item No. II ( ii ) of Circular No. Cir/Set/69 dated 10/10/1967 of erstwhile Labour Secretariat of Banks in India advising banks as to the entitlement to medical expenses oftemporary employees as per Clause -50.1 of Bipartite Settlement. Subsequent Bipartite Settlements came to be approving entitlement ofpart time employees of medical expenses is a factsupporting payment of medical expenses to temporary employees. Hence the prayer to order payment of medical expenses to temporary employees .

4. In the Counter Statement the contention raised briefly are as follows :

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 12011 / 57/2008 - IR (B - II ) dated 30-07-2008 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .

The scheduled mentioned in that order is :

"Whether the action of the management of Vijaya Bank denying the medical facilities /rnedical reimbursement facilities to the temporary workmen is justified ? If not to whatrelief the temporary workmen are entitled to?"

2.After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 1/2009 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their authorized representatives and filed their claim , counter statement and rejoinder statement as the case may be .

3. The Claim Statement averments briefly read as

follows:

Theservice conditions are governed by Sastri Award asmodified by Desai Award and Bipartite Settlements . In Para-450 of Sastri Award between IBA and All India Trade Unions of Bank Employees , the directives emerged accordingtowhich the reimbursement of medical expenses islimited to permanent employees only which was extended to permanent part -time workmen as well under Settlement date 08-11-1973 . The entitlement of temporary employees to such aid was negatived and the management representatives ofbanks were not in favour of considering them as employees . The dispute could not have been raised ifthere had been enabling provision in any Award or so. The proposal of IBA to provide medical expenses to temporary employees is only as a benevolent gesture which cannot be interpreted in such a way that temporary employees were getting the same earlier and IBA wants to curtail it . Desai Award just clang to allowing no further change to the medical expense provisions . The casual workers andjob workers do not come under the operation of the Award . It is beyond one's comprehension that temporary employees are entitled to medical aid . Hence the claim does not merit consideration . Medical aid was never extended to temporary employees in the absence of enabling provisions and therefore there is no any violation. Wrong interpretation is attempted to be given to the Desai Award by the petitioner . The petitioner union cannot get anybenefit out ofthe letter dated 22-04-1968 of IBA which has no binding nature . No Award or Settlement supports the stand of the Union . The matter is to be discussed and settled at the industry level . The refusal to grant aid to temporary employees is justified and lawful . The claim is The Industrial Dispute arose due to non- payment of annual medical aid to temporary employees of Vijaya Bank against the provisions of the awards and Bipartite Settleinents . The concept of medical aid emerged as a service condition under Para- 450 of Sastri Award. The amount stood fixed at Rs . 1,500 per annum by the Bipartite Settlement dated 02-06-2005 . In Desai Award the dernand of Indian Bank's Association was not considered the urge for medical aid to avoid non - payment of medical claim to temporary employees . The award finds recited in it " as regards the other categories of workmen , whenever a provision of the award is not intended to be applicable to them, same has been specified at the proper place" . In Desai Tribunal proceedings , there is recorded submission of the Indian Bank's Association based on the demand of temporary employees that they should be granted medical 5337 भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

beyond the scope of awards and settlements . No grounds aremade out by the Union for such entitlement . The claim may be dismissed .

5. In the rejoinder filed over and above averments in Claim Statement by way of reiteration the further contentions raised are as follows in a nutshell :

That submission of IBA before Desai Tribunal supporting payment of medical expenses to temporary employees stated as a benevolent gesture is nothing but a figment of imagination . IBA has categorically affirmedthe entitlement of temporary employees to medical expenses by circulars already referred which are not superseded. The guidelines mentioned in the counter admitted as 40 years old and so by now obsolete are still in force .

6. The points for consideration are :

( i ) Whether the, denial of medical facilities to temporary workmen of Vijaya Bank isJustified?

(ii ) To what relief the workmen are entitled?

7. On the side ofthe petitioner , Ex . WI to Ex.W22 and on the side ofthe Respondent Ex.M1 to Ex.M6 were marked, both on consent . No oral evidence was adduced on either side . Heard both sides .

Point No.1

would arise . They further contended that the fact that the IBA mooted proposals to provide medical expenses to temporary employees is only as a benevolent measure and the same cannot be interpreted in such a way that theyhad been in receipt of any such a benefit earlier or that they are also entitled to be given such benefits on par with regular employees under the Bank . Desai Award just affirms what existed in the Sastri Award in relation to the provisions for payment of medical expenses and reimbursements to the employees who are meant to be only regular employees. Desai Award evidently clang to stand by the same provisions in relation thereto as in the Sastri Award. The casual and job workers were never intended to come under the operation ofthe Award . The circular dated 22-4-1968 of IBA under which the Petitioner Union purports to claim entitlement to medical expenses is capable of being characterized as only a proposal manifesting benevolent gesture towards the temporary employees in regard to payment of medical expenses to them. The said circular cannot have any binding force or enforceability . It lacks force in the absence of anything in the Awards or Bipartite Settlements under which temporary employees are unambiguously not declared entitled to payment of medical expenses . On behalf of the Respondent it is also pointed out that the claim of the Union is not found supported by any of the awards or settlements . According to them , the matter of payment of medical expenses to temporary employees is yet to be discussed at the industry level and directive issued thereafter. According to them the claim is beyond the scope of awards and settlements . They continue to saythat at no time medical aid was extended to temporary employees . They canvassed for the further contention thet there is no violation of any awards or settlements in the matter of denial of medical expenses to temporary employees .

9.Having considered the contentions for and against the question of entitlement of temporary employees to payment ofmedical expenses and medical reimbursements bestowing an anxious consideration , I am led to conclude that as per the provisions in vogue in the Awards and Bipartite Settlements , the intentment is never to grant medical reimbursements or medical aid to temporary employees . I am fortified in concluding so from the fact that admittedly there was proposal raised by the A to providemedical expenses to temporary employers which is found recorded in the Desai Tribunal proceedings . Therein the claim was to pay medical expenses on pre-fala basis. In spite of that Desai Award concluded with the finding that no uniform rate of medical expenses can be provided. If IBA's proposal stood approved by the Awards orSettlements , there is no reason wwhy temporary employees are not extended the benefits of medical expenses . The fact that permanent part -time employees came to be approved in the categoryofemployees entitled to payment ofmedical 8. The claim of temporary workmen of Vijaya Bank for entitlement to medical expenses and reimbursement espoused by their Union discernibly is not under an already conferred right provided in any awards or Bipartite Settlements . The concept of medical aid evidently had its debut as a service condition under Para -450 Sastri Award . Under the awards and Bipartite Settlements what is specifically and categorically stated regarding the entitlement to medical expenses/ medical reimbursements is to permanent employees only . This benefit thereafter stood extended to permanent part - time workmen as well under settlement dated 8-11-1973 . Evidently, there had been a clamour for payment of medical expenses or reimbursement ofthe same by the temporary employees pursuant to which the Indian Banks Association had occasion to make a demand at the industrial level as seen recited in Desai Tribunal proceedings that temporary employees should be granted medical expenses on pro - rata basis . It is pointed outthat under Circular dated 22-4-1968 of the IBA allegedly gaining support from the Bipartite Settlement dated 19-10- 1966, it is made clear that temporary employees are entitled to medical aid and expenses . The case of the Respondent Bank is that the entitlement of temporary employees to any such benefits was negatived and the management representatives of the Banks were not favouring temporary employees to be considered as employees . It is further pointed out on behalf of the Respondent that if there had been any enabling provision in any Award or Bipartite Settlements no necessity of any dispute having to be raised

3175 G1/09--22 5338

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009 / BHADRA 21 , 1931

[ PART II SEC: 3 ( ii) ]

competent authorities or statutory bodies of men under a proper settlement . Therefore , on the appreciation of the factual and legal position as is obtaining , it is hardly possible to enter a finding that the temporary employees areentitled to conferment of medical expenses on par with permanent employees or on pro -rata basis in the absence ofthe fact that a potential source force such an entitlement is yet to generate under the common will of bodies of men or authorities competent to create instruments incorporating terms or provisions such as Bipartite Settleinents , Awards , etc. at the industrial level as rightly pointed out on behalf of the Respondent .

10. The idealistic concept or perception , of an Industrial Adjudicator that temporary employees are also to be extended the medical benefits as extended to the permanent employees or on prorata basis if any entertained has to give way to the legal and authentic provisions now obtaining on the sphere of activity . However, it is germane to consider that it is high time that the call of temporary employees for conferment of medical benefits them is not yet given a fruitful consideration by whomsoever it is concerned. It is pertinent to note that the concept of conferment of medical benefits to permanent employees emerged long years back and the present refusal to extend them to the temporary employees based on considerations which have now become obsolete due to efflux of long years of time is still to be allowed to be the rule . In spite of that I am to hold that as per the existing provisions , the medical benefits cannot be conferred to the temporary employees though I am of the view that it is high time that it has not yet been thought of extending such benefits to temporary employees as well since the bottomline considerations under which such benefits were once denied to temporary employees have now become obsolete due to efflux of long years of time . The conferment of medical facilities was based on a consensus of the manageinent of the various banks . One of the reasons for not extending the benefit to temporary employees is that the bank managers are not in favour of considering the temporary employees as employees . But it is pertinent to ask should not this view undergo change ? It is always good to remember that a temporary appointment is not one made as a casualty. In terms of Para - 20.7 of the Ist Bipartitc Settlement " temporary employee will mean a workmen who has been appointed for a limited period for work which is of an essentially temparary in nature or who is employed temporarily as an additional workman in connection with a temporary increase in work of a permanent nature and includes a workman who is appointed in a temporary vacancy caused by the absence of a particular permanent workman " . When it could be realized from the aforementioned contingencies upon which expenses in subsequent Bipartite Settlements and still there was no inclination to confer such benefits to temporary employees is a supporting factor showing that by then as well the extension of medical expenses to temporary employees was not favourably considered or granted. Even from the inception of the emergence of the concept of reimbursement of medical expenses as is seen from Para- 450 ofSastri Award , the intention was to limit it to permanent employees whereunder the entitlement to temporary employees was staunchly negatived and the representatives of the banks were hesitant to consider temporary employees as employees . Discernibly the question as to conferment of medical benefits to temporary employees was a matter which was adverted to by whoever was concerned but the same was being denied all along consistently . It shows that the proposal of granting such the same benefits to temporary employees had gained the attention of all concerned but such benefits were being denied to them discernibly after a well consideration of the overall circumstances pertaining to it as could be gathered from the various provisions contained in the respective Awards , bipartite settlements and Tribunal proceedings . Those considerations are discernibly on the basis of sound reasoning then obtainable while the concept of conferment ofmedical benefits emerged for the first time before the concerned Tribunals or Statutory Bodies ofMen . The non- inclusion of temporary employees as eligible category for entitlement for medical aid is understandably not due to any inadvertence , omission or any other mistakes . It was only after a fully advertent decision after deliberation and proper consideration . It was under a determination to exclude them from the operation of the benefit on proper and disclosed reasons . Of course the acceptability of the reasons may be a relative factor varying from person to person depending upon his subjective views . So viewed 1 am of the opinion that the arguments of the learned counsel of the Respondent are more to the point so as to tilt a decision in favour of the Respondent . As it is it cannot be foundthat temporary employees are entitled to payment of any medical aid or expenses under the shelter of any of the provisions of the Awards or Bipartite Settlements . Any such intention manifested in a circular not having force of a rule cannot be said reliable to support a contention for extension of medical benefits . The question of extension ofmedical benefits to temporary employees is discernibly yet a matter to be discussed and settled at the industry level . A mere wish in the wake of a clamour from some temporary employees for conferment of medical aid or expenses cannot be a driving force to award any such benefits to temporary employees at the instance of an Industrial Adjudicator when enabling provision to do so is conspicuously absent in the basic and authentic documents such as Awards or Bipartite Settlernent emanating from 5339 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

phraseology "justice to be done according to law" . In the light of the above discussion , I hold that denial of medical facilities/medical reimbursement facilities to temporary employees of Vijaya Bank is justified . The point is answered in favour of the Respondent .

Point No. 2

The next point to be decided to what relief the workmen are entitled to ?

11. In view of the above findings, the petitioner union isnot entitled to any relief.

12. Thus , the reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictated to the PA, transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 10th July, 2009)

A. N. JANARDANAN, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined:

For the I Party/ Petitioner : None

: None

Forthe II Party/Mgmt.

Documents Marked:

On the petitioner's side

Date

Ex. No.

Description

Ex.Wi

Copy of Extract of Sastry Award on Medical Aid

Ex.W2

Copy of Extract of Desai Award on Medical Aid

Ex.W3

Copy of Extract of Desai Award regarding applicability of Award

Ex. W4

Copy of Extract of Desai Award regarding classification of employees

Ex.W5

Copy of Extract of First Bipartite Settlement on Medical Aid

Ex.W6

Copy ofExtract of Bipartite Settlement dated 08-11-1973 on Medical Aid

Ex.W7

Copy of Extract of III Bipartite Settlement on Medical Aid

Ex.W8

Copy ofExtract of Bipartite Settlement dated 31-10-1979 on Medical Aid

Ex.W9

Copy ofExtract ofBipartite Settlement dated 22-11-1979 on Medical Aid

Ex.W10

Copy ofExtract of Bipartite Settlement dated 08-09-1983

Ex.W11

Copy of Extract of IV Bipartite Settlement on Medical Aid the appointment of temporary employees is necessitated to be made are owing to exigencies of public services to meet emergent situations to cope up with the exercise of functions such employees are appointed, a special note of caution is to be struck by all concerned that the temporary employees are not workmen to whom only a mediocre importance is to be attached. It has to be borne in mind that though they are employed on an ad- hoc basis , they are supposed to do vital functions having to be got discharged in the establishments or institutions in which they are so employed but for whose appointment such functions or business could not have been performed in a specified or time-bound manner . If the denial of the medical aid to the temporary employees is attributable to the fact that bank managements were not in favour of considering them as employees as one of the reasons such a view according to me cannot be a sound basis for such a refusal . When temporary employees are appointed in the contingencies asmentioned above , so they having to be treated as being supposed to work for limited periods there is no meaning whytheymay not be entitled to conferment of medical aid for the period, they are working or they are supposed to continue to work on a pro - rata basis for which there was already a proposal at the instance of the IBA as found recorded in the proceedings of the Desai Tribunal . The said proposal is indicative of the fact that in spite of there having been no provision enacted under the award or bipartite settlement, there did arise a strong demand advocating the cause of temporary employees to conferment ofmedical aid. It was on pro - rata basis that is in proportion to the service already put in or total service such employees are expected to put in the course of their employment . This makes it abundantly clear that notwithstanding the embodiment of the provision for conferment of medical aid to temporary employees under any bipartite settlements or awards there have been proposals mooted at the level of IBA to confer such benefits to temporary employees as well as a gesture of their welfare . The Circular dated 22-4-1968 of IBA also did contain such proposal demonstrably manifesting such benevolent gesture towards temporary employees . True the said circular cannot have any persuasive force to confer such benefits . In this context it is relevant to consider why such proposal be transformed into reality by enacting a provision for entitlement to medical aid by temporary employees at this time it is much later in point of time than the time at which the guidelines were issued for the first time for conferment of medical aid to the permanent employees. In this context, I am reminded of the proposition that the duty of an Industrial Adjudicator is to do justice in accordance with the existing law as is well said by the 5340

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

Ex.W12

नई दिल्ली, 13 अगस्त, 2009 CopyofExtract ofBipartite Settlement dated 28-02-1985 on Medical Aid

Ex.W13

Copy ofExtract ofBipartite Settlement dated 05-01-1987 on Medical Aid

Ex.W14

Copy ofExtract ofV Bipartite Settlement on Medical Aid

Ex.W15

का.आ. 2505.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ बड़ौदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 69/04 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-09 को प्राप्त हुआ था । Copy ofExtract of Bipartite Settlement dated 23-02-1989 on Medical Aid

[सं. एल-12011/208/2003- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] Ex.W16

Copy of Extract of Bipartite Settlement dated 29-06-1990 on Medical Aid

राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी Ex.W17

New Delhi , the 13th August, 2009 CopyofExtract of Bipartite Settlement dated 29-10-1993

Ex.W18

Copy of Extract of VI Bipartite Settlement on Medical Aid

Ex.W19

Copy of Extract of VII Bipartite Settlement on Medical Aid

Ex.W20

Copy of Extract of VIII Bipartite Settlernent on Medical Aid

S.O. 2505.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 69/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal Labour Court , Jabalpur now asshown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Bank of Baroda and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 12-8-09.

Ex.W21

[No. L - 12011 /208/2003-1R (B- 11 ) ]

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer Copy of Extract of Indian Banks ' Association Circular No. CIR/ SET/ 19- 68 dated 22.04.1968

ANNEXURE

Ex.W22

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT IINDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/69/04

Copy ofExtract of the Minutes ofthe JointConsultative Committee Meeting between the representatives of the Petitioner Union and the Management of the Respondent Bank held on 05.07.2005

Presiding Officer: Shri Mohd . Shakir Hasan On the Management's side

Ex . No. Date

The General Secretary

Description

Ex. MI 5-6-2006 Copy of letter regarding I.D. raised by

Bank ofBaroda Employees Union MP, C/oBank ofBaroda , Siyaganj Branch , Indore

Workman/Union

Versus

The Regional Manager ,

Vijaya Bank Workers ' Organisation before the Dy . Chief Labour Commissioner ( Central ) regarding non- payment of inedical aid and expenses to temporary employees engaged in various branches of the Bank

ExM2

Copyof Page No. 140 and 141 of Sastri Award ( Para No. 505 to 514)

Bank ofBaroda ; M.P. Nagar , Zonal office , 202, Zone- I , Bhopal

Management Ex, M3

CopyofPara No. 11.7 of Desai Award

AWARD

Ex, M4

Passed on this 28th day of April 2009 Copy of Para No. 16.6 to 17.2 of Desai Award

Ex. M5

Copy ofPara No. 21.1 of Desai Award

Ex. M6.

Copy ofClause No. IX ofthe Bipartite Settlement dated 08-11-1973

1.TheGovernment of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L- 12011 / 208 /2003-1R( B - 11 ) dated 14-6-2004 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :---

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

"Whether the action of the management of Dy . General Manager , Bank of Baroda, MP Zone in not regularising the disputants (as per list annexed) . If notto whatrelief these workmen are entitled for ?"

2. The case ofthe Bank of Baroda Employees Union , MP inshort is that the members of the Union whose names are given in Annexure along with reference have attained the status ofpermanent employee of the management Bank asthey have continuously worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year . It is further stated that the management has started fresh appointment of sub - staff on regular vacant postwithout giving any preference to those workmen who are engaged by the Bank on daily wages and are working on temporary basis with the Bank for the last more than eight to ten years . It is stated that the workmen have filed several representation to the management but the management has taken no care and as such the said reference . It is prayed that the management be directed to regularise all the workmen as given in the refernce w.e.f. 1-5-89 with arrears of salary and consequential benefits with penal interest .

3.On the other hand, the management appeared and contested the case by filing Written Statement. The case ofthe management inter- alia is that the Bank of Baroda Employees Union has no locus - standi to raise the dispute onthe ground that as per the provisions of the by - laws of the Union , the employees employed in Bank of Baroda only can become members . The disputants are not employed by the management of Bank and as such , they are not members of the Union . It is stated that applicant Shri Hiralal ( Sl . No. 8) and Shri Laxman Sahu (Sl . No. 9) have already filed writ petitions No. 2339/03 and No. 2338/03 respectively before the Hon'ble High Court of Bilaspur seeking for the same relief. Similary Shri P. Harijan (Sl . No. 13) also has filed Writ Petition No. 1107/04 before the Hon'ble High Court at Jabalpur . It is stated that they havealready chosen the forum of highest judiciary of the State for redressal of their grievances and as such , the reference is not maintainable . It is also stated that Shri Mohan Lal Patel (Sl . No. 5) has already raised an Industrial Dispute which is already pending in this court which is numbered as CGIT / LC / R/ 95/03 . As such , his case is also not maintainable . It is further stated that the reference is vague and there is no relationship ofemployer - employee between the management and the disputants . It is also denied that the disputant have worked for 240 days in any calendar year . It is further stated that the management are regularising certain cases ofthe individuals on merits . On these grounds , it is submitted that the Union has not locus- standi to raise the dispute on behalf of the disputants and

5341 therefore the reference be answered in favour of the management.

4. During the course of proceedings , both the partieshave filed a Corrected vide order dated 21-7-2009 application No. 11 praying therein to wilthdraw the reference as both the parties have settled as per the terms of settlement between the management and All India Bank of Baroda Employees Federation , Mumbai on date 18-3-2008 . It is stated that one of the clause 3 ( i ) ofthe said terms of settlement shows that the employce or Union shall withdraw the case pending before the court and in compliance of the said clause , the disputants have filed this Corrected vide order dated 21-7-2009 petition notjointly with the management . It appears from the application No. 11 that the management has not signed over this application in confirmation of joint petition . It is also argued on behalf of the management that there is no provision of withdrawal of reference in this court whereas the case shall be withdrawn by the Governemnt itself.

5. I also perused the terms of settlement and I find thatthere is no illegality in the terms of settlement but this terms of settlement is not accepted by the management in this case . The management has also filed a reply No. 12 stating therein that the disputants have no interest to pursue with the present dispute and as such , the management has no objection if no dispute award is passed on the pending reference . It is stated that the terms of settlement is of general nature and as such the present dispute cannot be withdrawn.

6. On perusal of the entire record , it is clear that one of the disputant Shri Mohanlal Patel has already raised an Industrial Dispute before this reference and the same is pending and is registered as case No. CGIT / LC/ R/95 / 03 . As such, in my opinion , as that case is of earlier date and is still pending , the disposal of this reference will not affect to this disputant and his reference will still continue .

7. Considering the entire facts and the materials available on the record, I find that the workmen except Shri Mohanlal Patel (Sl . No. 5) have no interest to pursue the case as they are interested in withdrawal . As such , No Dispute Award is passed without any orders as to costs.

8. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules .

MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN , Presiding Officer 5342

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii )] नई दिल्ली , 13 अगस्त , 2009

ultimately improper findings were given by the Enquiry Officer against the Second Party , based on which punishment was accorded to him . As the conciliation proceedings failed , this reference came to be registered before this Court for reinstatement with full back wages .

का.आ. 2506. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय पूना के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 497/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-12011/149/2000- आई आर( बी-11 ) ]

राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th August , 2009 .

2. The First Party resisted the claim by filing written statement at Exh . 13. The allegations of unfairness , improperness and illegality in the enquiry have been denied. It has also been specificallydenied that the enquiry was conducted against the principles of natural justice and fair opportunity was not given . He also denied that the documents were not supplied to the Second Party in the enquiry. It has been contended that every fair and proper opportunity was given to the Second Party to defend his case, defence representative was allowed to be appointed of his choice , adjournments were granted and ultimately on the basis of the evidence , the Enquiry Officer gave the findings . Any sort of illegality , or unfairness was not committed by the Enquiry Officer . On these and other grounds , it prayed for rejection of the reference .

S.O. 2506. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award -(Ref. No. 497/2000 ) ofthe Labour Court Pune now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Bank of Maharashtra and their workmen, which was received by the Central Govemment on 12-8-2009 .

[ No. L- 12011 / 149/2000- IR(B- II) ]

RAJINDER KUMAR , Desk Officer

3. On the basis of the pleadings , averments , allegations and rival contentions , following issued came to be recast on 4-10-2007; out of which the following issues came to be treated as preliminary issues ; the reasonings and findings thereon are as follows :

ANNEXURE

Preliminary Issue

Findings BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER III LABOUR COURT, PUNE AT PUNE

1. Whether the enquiry conducted by the Yes FirstParty is illegal , unfair and improper ?

Exh . No.:16

Reference (IDA) No. 497/2000

No General Manager ( Personnel )

Bank of Maharashtra

2. Whether the evidece before the Enquiry Officer was insufficient to prove the misconduct ?

Central Office,

3. Whatorder ?

1501 , Lokmangal , Shivajinagar Pune(Maharashtra) -411005

...... First Party

Enquiry is held asillegal , unfair and improper.

AND

REASONS

The General Secretary Bank of Maharashtra Karmachari Sena 9, Anantlaxmi , Ideal Colony , Kothrud Pune (Maharashtra ) -411029

..... Second Party

Coram

: Shri P. T. Rahule

APPEARANCES : Mr. R.G. Londhe-Adv for 1 Party

Mr. N. A. Kulkarni-Adv for II Party

4. Preliminary Issue No. 1 : The First party examined Nandkumar Chintaman Talwalkar at Exh . 27 and Anand Bhalchandra Deshpande at Exh . 32 and alos relied upon the documentary evidence . On the other hand , the Second Party did not examine himself and relied upon the cross examination of the First Party witnesses and the documentary evidence.

ORDER ON PRELIMINARY ISSUE

AWARD- 1

(Delivered on this day on 5th March , 2009 )

5. It is evident from the testimony of First Party witness No.1 - Nandkumar Chintaman Talwalkar ( Exh . 27 ) thaton the basis of the misconduct , chargesheet was issued to the Second Party and the enquiry was conducted . The Second Party was represented by his legal representative . He specifically deposed that during enquiry (Exh . 28 collectively) , he followed the principles of natural justice and also gave sufficient opportunity to the Second Party to contest the case .

6. In cross examination , this witness has admitted that alongwith the enquriy register ( Ext.28 ) , the First Party has not filed any document exhibited in the enquiry . He also admitted that the document mentioned on Page No. 34 of the enquiry proceeding are not attached in the enquiry The case of the Second Party - Prakash Dattaram Mahadik in brief is that he was working as a " Sub - staff" withthe First Party since 21-2-1983 till 12-7-1999. Suddenly on 19-2-1998 on the false allegations of misappropriation of the amount , chargesheet was served upon him and the enquiry was conducted against the principles of natural justice without giving him fair and proper oportunity to defend himself in the enquiry . Absolutely , illegal , unfair enquiry was conducted by the Enquiry Officer. The documents were not supplied to the Second Party in the enquiry and hence he could not lead his evidence and

ト 5343 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

xerox copies were exhibited and hence any illegality was not committed by the Enquiry Officer in the enquiry, especially when every fair and proper opportunity was given to the Second Party in the enquiry conducted on the principles of natural justice .

register ( Exh . 28 ) . It has also been admitted by him that the document ME - 10 mentioned at Page No. 49, document 16 to 18. mention at page no . 72 are not attached in register Exh.28.However , he denied that he gave findings without referring the documents . Further, he also admitted that the documents which were referred to the enquiry are not filed on record .

11. Having considered the submissions tabled by both the sides and the admissions given by both the witnesses of the First Party , it is clear that the xerox copics ofall these documents referred above and produced before theEnquiry Officer and even before the Court , despite the stand taken by the Second Party in cross examination before the Court, the First Party did not even bother to produce those originals claimed to be in existence .

7. It is evident from the testimony of other witness- Anand Bhalchandra Deshpande at Exh . 32 that the xerox copies of documents ME- 2 to ME- 15 were submitted by the management in the enquiry . It is also evident from his testimony that the xerox copies were submitted along with the original documents which were verified by Mr. P.D. Mahadik and the defence representative in presence of the Enquiry Officer and on verification from the originals , the xerox copies were exhibited . He has also deposed that the xerox copies of the three Cheques - ME - 16 , ME - 17 and -ME - 18 were also produced alongwith the originals but the defence representative was absent . However , on verification of the original those three xerox copies were exhibited.

12. Considering all Facts available on record and the admissions given by the witness of the First party, keeping in view the submissions tabled by both the sides , one thing is clear that when the originals were not produced and verified, how xerox copies were exhibited in the enquiry proceeding . These facts and circumstances clearly show that the Enquiry Officer had gone ahead in committing illegality in the procedural aspect causing serious prejudice tothe Second Party do deprive him from taking his defence in a proper manner . 1 , therefore , reach the daunilcss conclusion that the enquiry conducted by the Enquiry Officer is illegal , unfair and improper and answer this Preliminary Issue No. I accordingly :

13. Preliminary Issue No. 2 : In view of the findgings on Preliminary Issue No. I as it has been held that enquiry is illegal , unfair and improper , the evidence in the enquiry cannot be considered for appreciation and hence , this Preliminary Issue No.2 becomes redundant and need not be answered as the enquiry itself is going to be vitiated . 1. therefore , answer this Preliminary Issue No.2 accordingly , and in the aftermath , pass follwoing order:

ORDER

It is held and declared that the enquiry is illegal, unfair and improper and hence stands vitiated . No order as to the costs.

8. In cross examination , this witness has clearly deposed that the Enquiry register ( Exh.28) does not consist the original exhibits ME -2 to ME - 15 of the enquiry . He also deposed that the original exhibits DE - 1 to DE- 5 mentioned in page No. 2 of the enquiry register (Exh . 28 ) are not placed in the enquiry register . Similarly , the original exhibits ME - 12 to ME - 15 mentioned in page 34 ofthe enquiry register (Exh.28) are also not placed in the enquiry register . He also further mentioned that the original exhibits ME- 10 mentioned in page No. 49 and the original exhibits ME- 16 to 18 mentioned in page No. 72 are not placed in the enquiry register . Similary, the original exhibits DE- 7 (page 61 ) , DE - 10 ( page 72 ), DE- 11 and 12 ( page 94) , DE- 13 , 14, 15 (page 99) , DE - 16 ( page 102 ) and DE- 19 and 21 (page 105 ) are not produced on record . From the cross examination of thiswitness , it is clear that the xerox copies ofthe documents which have been exhibited by the Enquiry Officer (witness No.1) in the enquiry, but the originals were neither placed before the Enquiry Officer nor the same have been produced before the Court.

Place: Pune

Date: 5-3-2009

P.T. RAHULE, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 13 अगस्त, 2009.

9. The learned Advocate -Mr. N.A. Kulkarni , for the Second Party, has submitted that the xerox copies of the documents were exhibited in the enquiry without producing the originals and the originals are not even placed on record before theCourt . He further submitted that when the original documents were not produced in the Court , the Second Party did not have opportunity to defend himself in a proper manner and exhibiting the documents without producing the originals on record and without verifying the same amounts to serious injustice and illegality on the part of the Enquiry Officer in conducting the enquiry.'

का.आ. 2507.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ बड़ौदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , श्रम न्यायालय लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 39/2004) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-12011/283/2003 - आई आर ( बी-11 ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी 10. Per contra, the learned Advocate Mr. R.G. Londhe, for the First Party, has submitted that the originals wereproduced in the enquiry and after verifying the same , 5344

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/ BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] New Delhi , the 13th August , 2009

S.O. 2507.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref . No. 39/2004 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court , Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Bank of Baroda and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 12-8-2009 .

[No. L- 12011 /283 /2003-1R(B - II) ]

and working as such continuously. It has been submitted by the workman's union that the workman is getting 3 /4th scale wages w.e.f. 01-01-2001 , however , he is being paid wages for Sundays and holidays w.e.f. December , 2003 and bonus w.e.f. April, 1998. Further , the workman's union hassubmitted that the workman is working as temporary sweeper since 1991 and work of sweeper is perennial nature in the branch ; accordingly it has prayed that the management of the Bankbe directed to regularized the services ofworkman as permanent sweeper w.e.f. 23-01-91 with all consequential benefits including full back wages and seniority etc.

RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

Present : N. K. Purohit , Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 39/2004

Ref. No. L- 12011 /283 /2003 - IR ( B- II) Dated : 3-3-2004

Between

The General Secretary

Bank ofBaroda Staff Association UP Madhav Bhawan, 15/222 A, Civil Lines , Kanpur (UP)-208001

(Espousing cause of Shri Shankar Lal )

4. Per contra the management of the Bank of Baroda hasdisputed the claim of the workman's union by filing its written statement wherein it has submitted that for appointment in the sub - staff, the vacancy is notified to the Employment Exchange for sponsoring suitable candidates as per criteria prescribed; thereafter , appointment letters areissued by the Competent Authority after ensuring due procedure and since the workman has never undergone selection procedure there arise no question of appointing workman on temporary basis . However , engagement of the workman by the Branch Manager, without sanction of the Competent Authority , on adhoc basis as a stop gap arrangement does not entitle him to claim any benefit . Accordingly, it has prayed that the claim of the workman's union be rejected without any relief to the workman concerned.

AND

The Asstt . General Manager

5.The workma's union has filed rejoinder whereby it hasonly reiterated his averments in the statement of claim and has not introduced any new fact .

Bank ofBaroda RegionalOffice, 19, Way Road, Lucknow - 226001

AWARD

21-7-2009

6. After submission of documentary cvidence in support of their respective cases by the parties , the workman's union was given opportunity to lead evidence in supportport of its averments , but on the date fixed, the workman's union did not forward any evidence in support oftheir case rather filed application for withdrawal of case (W-29) along with affidavit of the Dy . General Secretary of theworkman's union ( W -31 ) and that of workman (W- 30) ; accordingly , the authorized representative of the management stated not to adduce any evidence in rebuttal .

7. Heard the representative of the parties and perused entire evidence on record .

1. By order No. L- 12011 /283/2003 - IR(B - II ) Dated: 03-03-2004 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour , New Delhi in exercise ofpowers conferredby clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) ofSection 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) referred this industrial dispute between the General Secretary , Bank of Baroda Staff Association UP , Madhav Bhawan , 15/222 A, Civil Lines , Kanpur ( U.P. ) (Espousing cause of Shri Shankar Lal) and the Asstt. General Manager , Bank of Baroda, Regional Office, 19 , Way Road , Lucknow for adjudication.

2. The reference under adjudication is:

Whether the action of the management of Bank of Baroda, Raibareilly in not regularizing Shri Shankar Lal, sweeper is legal and justified? If not , what relief ifthe concerned workman entitled to ?"

8. The workman's union in its affidavit (W -31 ) has stated that a settlement has been arrived between the union of the workman and bank on 18-03-2008 regarding regularization of the workmen and the bank has agreed upon to regularize the workman , which is admitted to the authorized representative of the bank to the extent that a settlement has been arrived between the union of the workmen and bank on 18-03-2008 regarding regularization of the workmen. As regard Bank's agreement to regularization workman is concerned it has been submitted by the authorized representative of the management that the management of the bank has to regularize only those workmenwhose name finds reference in the said settlement 3. The case of the workman's union in brief is that the workman , Shri Shankar Lal was appointed in the bank as part time sweeper on 1 /3rd scale wages w.e.f. 23-1-91 5345

भारत कोसजार सितम्बर 12, 2009/ 21,1931NO SITHAAD SH

[भास 11 खण्ड 3(ii)]

no,New Delhi , the 13th August, 2009 subject to fulfillment of certain conditions, Since list of workmen and copy of the said settlement is not on the record, therefore, whethen, the name of workman finds reference in the settlement or not is to be verified. The workman's union has stated that in view of the settlement there is no need to proceed with the present industrial dispute and accordingly, has expressed its willingness to withdraw the dispute with the leave of the Tribunalion A

bor8.0 2508cfe pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispates Act, 1947 ( 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 29,30 & 31/1992 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court No.1 , Chandigarh naw: as shown in the Annexure in the Hocdustrial Dispute between the employees in relatiort to the management of Punjab National Bank and their workmen, which was received by the Central Governinention 12-8-2009.

2012/396/91 - IR(B- II) ]

e bavione es, elvet No. 12012/397/91 -IR(B- II ) ]

[No. L- 12012/ 399/91 - IR(B-H ) ]

istina ) att ( BRAJINDER KUMAR, DeskOfficer

BEFORE SHIRIGYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL COVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUME- LABOUR COURT- I ,

OVANDICARE

Case No. 1.D. 29, 30 & 31/1992

TheGeneral Secretary Indian Bank Employees Federation,

3135, Sector 3D, Chandigarh

en And oft le Applicant

Versus betul

9. It is well settled that if a party challenges the legality of an order, the burden lies upon him to prove illegality ofthe action ofthe management and ifno evidence is produced the party invoking jurisdiction of the Court must fail . In the instant case the burden was on the workman's union to prove that the action of the management of Bank of Baroda in not regularizing the workman , was illegal and unjustified . The workman's union does not want to adduce any oral evidence in support of their case . Moreover , the workman's union as well as workman concerned has requested for leave of the Tribunal towithdraw the case vide affidavit dated 14-07-2009 (W-31 &W-30 respectively ), stating therein that a settlement has been arrived between the union of the workman and bank on 18-03-2008 regarding regularization ofthe workman and the bank has agree upon to regularize the workman and accordingly, there is no need to proceed with the present industrial dispute as grievances of the workman standa redressed. Thus, the representative ofthe workmari's union has prayed to pass suitable orders

The Regional Manager, Punjab National Bank, Regional Office, Ferozepurkat to Pat na

we nobiluga ... Respondent

Shri Raj Kaushik, AR

Fortheworkman

Shri Rajesh Gupta, AR

For theManagement

Passedsed onon 21-7-09

10. Although provisions of withdrawal of suits under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC are not applicable in the matter of reference under Section 10 of 1.D. Act but. in view ofthe submission of the workman's union for withdrawal of the case, there is no grievance left with the workman and concerned Trade Union . Resultantly, no relief is required tobe given to the workman, concerned, The reference under adjudication is answered accordingly .

11. Award as above .

Place: Lucknows mit

Date: 21-7-2009 N.K. PUROHIT , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 13 अगस्त , 2009

का.आ. 2508. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947

Government of India vide Notification No. L- 12012/ 396/91 -IR(B- 11) Dated 30-03-1992, L- 12012/397/91 - IR(B- 11) Dated30-03-1992 and No. L12092/399 /91 - IR(B -11 ) dated 30-03-1992, by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , (hereinafter referred to akan Act), referred the following industrial disputes for adjudication to this Tribunah : dTJA

1. "Whether the claim of Indian National Bank का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नैशनल बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, न. । चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 29, 30 एव 31/1992 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , को केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप

Employees Federation (Parim & Changin ) on of them se were the management was ju any, areare the workinen cititled to ?

[से एल-12012/396/ 91 - आई आर ( बी -11 ) ]

[सं. एल-12012/397/91 - आई आर (बी -11 ) ]

से एल-12012/399 /91 आई आर (बी -11 ) ]

af of toruscom मार , डेस्क अधिकारी

2 "Whether the claim of Indian National Bank Employees Federation (Punjab Chandigarh) that Sh . Suita Singly Gurtlechte Singh. Dara trada Singh Gurdial Singh & Somrap Swagh were Hensemployees of Pinjab National Bank, is 3175 G1/09-23 5346

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii )] correct? If so , whether termination of their services by the management was justified ? What relief, if any, are the workmen entitled to ?"

relationship between the workmen and the bank and accordingly, the bank was not obliged to issue any notice to the workmen on discontinuation of their services provided to the bank through Senior Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur.

3. "Whether the claim of Indian National Bank Employees' Federation (Punjab & Chandigarh) that Sh . Didar Singh was an employee ofPunjab National Bank , is correct ? If so, whether termination ofhis services by the management was justified ? What relief, if any, is the workman entitled to ?"

Common questions of law and facts are involved in these references ; hence , the references are disposed ofby thisaward.

Bothof the parties adduced oral evidence . Certain documents were also filed by the management . Appointment letter issued by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur under Section 17 of the Police Act 1961 , copy of the judgment dated 09-07-1991 passed in CWP No. 161/98 of Punjab and Haryana High Court , copy ofjudgment dated 25-11-1993 passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Sukhdev Singh & Others Versus Stateof Punjab and others , minutes of the meeting between Shri Surender Nath , Advisor to the Governor of Punjab and all the Officers of the banks working in the State of Punjab , dated 27-03-1984 have been filed. In compliance of the decision taken in the meeting , letter written by Inspector General of Punjab , CID Punjab , directing all the Senior Superintendents of Police in Punjab and Superintendent of Police at Kapurthala and Ropar for recruitments of Security Guards and their posting at the various branches ofthe bank have also been filed by the management .

Onperusal of the reference , referred by the Central Government , it is evident that the main issue for determination in these references is whether the workmen wereemployees of Punjab National Bank ? The workmen contended themselves as employees of the bank and alleged to be worked with the bank as such , for a substantial period as SPO for watch and ward duty. It is further contended by the workmen that they worked under the administrative control of the Branch Manager as other permanent employees of the bank . They worked for the safety and security of the bank as Gun Retainer/ Armed Guards . They were paid the wages directly by the bank. The bank terminated their services illegally without notice, or retrenchment compensation in violation of provisions ofSections 25F , 25G, 25H and 25N oftheAct.

I have perused the entire evidence , oral and documentary and other materials and record . From the perusal of the documents filed by the management ,manag the issue whether the workmen were the employees of bank caneasilybe asserted? From the appointment letter, it is clear that the workmen were appointed by Senior Superintendent of Police under Section 17 of the Police Act , 1961 , for specific purposes , to provide the securityto the banks in the adverse law and order situation in the State ofPunjab. These appointment letters were issued on account ofthe decision taken in the meeting between Shri Surender Nath , the then Advisor to the Governor of Punjab and the Officers of all the banks working in Punjab . Clause IV of the minutes of the decision taken on 27-03-1984 is as follows:

" Itwill be made plain to all individuals employed on this duty that they are not regular employees of the bank and should not , therefore , harbour in their minds any claim for permanent employment or other concessions which are available to Bank employees . However, as and when a Bank security force is raised . they willbe given preference in the matter of recruitment provided they are found fit otherwise and their performance has been upto the mark duringthisperiod . Employment as SPO is not a regular Government service . It is only an adhoc arrangement which has been provided in the Police Act to tide over a difficult law and order situation and the money proposed to be paid to them is not a salary but actually an honorarium for meeting out their pocket expenses etc. "

The claim petition was opposed by the Punjab National Bank by filing written statement . It is statedby the management in written statement that keeping in view the extraordinary law and order situation in the State of Punjab and with a view to provide the appropriate security to the banks in the State of Punjab , the then Advisor to the Govemor of Punjab , Shri Surender Nath had a meeting withthe senior officers of all the banks working in the State of Punjab on 27-03-1984 . In this meeting, the matter regarding providing the security to various branches of all thebanks was considered and certain decisions were taken . Onthe basis of the decisions taken on 27-03-1984 , Senior Superintendent of Police of every district in the State of Punjab was supposed to recruit SPOs under Section 17 of the Police Act, 1961. These SPOs were to be deputed to every branch of the bank . No salary was to be paid to the SPOs, but they were entitled for the honorarium of Rs . 15/- per day, which was subsequently enhanced to Rs. 30/- per day by the Superintendent of Police . In compliance ofthe decision taken on 27-03-1984, the Senior Superintendent of Police , Ferozepur , after taking interviews ofworkmen appointed them as SPOs in concerned branch ofthe bank .Accordingly, the honorartum was paid by the bank through Senior Superintendent of Police , Ferozepur. When the services of SPOs were not required , this arrangement was discontinued . The workmen were not the employees of the bank , thus , no question of their termination arises . There was no master - servant

As extra force was required for the security and protection ofbanks in Punjab , due to extremists ' activities , itwas decided that the recruitment of SPOs shall be made by the Senior Superintendent of Police concerned and an 5347 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

honorarium shall be paid by the bank through Senior Superintendent of Police . Thus, on perusal of entire materials on record , the following facts are clearly established :-

Moreover , this issue has been finally decided by Punjab andHaryana High Court in LPA No. 209 of 1992 Gurdeep Singh & Others Versus State of Punjab & Others . While dealing with the cases of the SPOs , the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the said judgment held as under :

1. That the workmen were recruited/ appointed by Senior Superintendent of Police concerned and not by the management of the bank

2. That the services ofthe workmen were provided onthe directions of the Senior Superintendent of Police concerned , on account of the decision taken in the meeting dated 27-03-1984 for specific purpose to provide the safety and security to the banks .

"Further, in dealing with this matter, it mustbe appreciated that special police officers werc appointed to deal with a special situation of temporary nature. In appointing them , no regular cadre was constituted. They , of course , constitute a special class , separate and distinct from regular police officers, but they can be no means to be compared to regular police officers in the matter of enrolment , training , discipline or even pay scales . "

3. No pay or salary was determined to be paid but it was decided that honorarium was to be paid to the SPOs @ Rs . 15/- per day, which wasthereafter , enhanced to Rs . 30/- per day .

4. The honorarium was paid to the workmen through Senior Superintendent of Police , and it was not paid directly to the workmen .

5. The workmen , SPOs were under the administrative control of the Senior Superintendent of Police and not of the manager ofthe concerned branch ofthe bank. The work of the SPO was regulated by the manager of concerned branch ofthe bank,when the SPO was deputed to the bank for security concern .

Learned counsel for the workmen on the above mentioned case further contended that in this case , the issue of regularization of the services of the workmen was considered. In these references , the issue in question is not regarding the regularization of the services of the workmen, but protection of right to work. I am not inclined to accept the contention of the learned counsel of the workmenbecause issue of master- servant relationship and employee-employer relationship between the SPOs and the bankwas considered and decided finally by the Hon ' ble High Court in the said judgment . It is true that previously Single Judge Bench ofHigh Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the State Government to pay the same salary at the same rate, which were being paid to the Guards employed by the banks or the Constables recruited by the State ofPunjab , but in Gurdeep Singh's judgment (supra) Hon'ble Division Bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court settled the issue that the SPOs are not entitled for the same pay as that of the Constables in the Police services and Security Guards in the bank services for the reasons mentioned in the judginent . Hon'ble High Court has specifically held that SPOs cannot be treated as Government servants .

The learned counsel for the management by reading the cross - examination of the management has tried to establish direct relationship between the workmen and the management . It was argued by the learned counsel for the workmen that the workmen were terminated from the services by the Manager of the concerned branch and a workman can be terminated when he is working under the administrative control . On going throught the entire evidence, oral and documentary collectively, it is clear that Manager of the concerned branch of the bank is neither the appointing authority nor the dismissal authority . He was entrusted the power to supervise the work of the SPO when deputed to the bank for specific purpose regarding the security concern of the bank. The termination letter issued by the Manager of the bank is without the authority of law and it shall be interpreted with reference to the arrangements made in other documentary evidence . When interpreted with reference to the other documents , it is evident that the services of workmen were not terminated but the manager discontinued the practice adopted on the basisof a meeting held on 27-03-1984 between the Officers ofthe bank and the then Advisor to the Governor of Punjab .

Therefore, on the basis of above observations , I am of the view that neither the workmen were recruited nor terminated by the bank . The services ofthe workmen were provided by the State of Punjab ( through the Senior Superintendent of Police concerned) to the bank for a specific purpose regarding the security concern . They were not under the administrative control ofthe bank , nor were paid the wages by the barik directly . As per the scheme of the State of Punjab , honorarjum was paid to them through Senior Superintendent of Police , Ferozepur . Accordingly. there is no doubt to hold that the workmen were not the employees of the bank and they are not entitled to any relief. All the three references are accordingly, answered: Letthe Central Government be approached for publication ofthe award, and thereafter, the files be consigned to the record room.

Thus , on the basis of the above discussion , I am of the view that no ernployer- employee relationship existed between the bank and workmen and it cannot be claimed by the workmen that they were employees of the bank.

G. K. SHARMA. Presiding Officer 5348

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

PARTI SEC. 3 (4 ) नई दिल्ली, 13 अगस्त, 2009

Sh . Bal Kishan , Daily- rated worker employed in the Sector- 16 , Panchkula Branch of the Bank w.e.f. 24-2-1995- is legal and justified? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled and from what date?" का.आ..2509. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1. चण्डीगढ़ के पंबाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 125/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार की 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -12012/145/96- आई आर ( सी-11 ) ]

Itis the contention ofthe workman that he worked with the management of respondent from 19-5-1994 ta 24-2-1995 continuously except three days in the month of January, 1995. His services were terminated without notice orretrenchment compensation on 24-2-1995 . On the other hand, the management of respondent bank denied that the workman has worked at any point of time in the bank .

राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th August, 2009

During the cross -examination of the workman certain questions were asked by learned counsel for the workman which reflects that workman had worked with the bank for the time he has pleaded . On page No. 2 W.WA, it is recorded that

"It is incorrect to suggest that have not worked continuously ". Reud 301 3 S.O. 2509. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 125/97 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal Labour Court No. 1.1. Chandigarh now asas shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofBank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Govemment on 12-8-2009.inpinion

Hann bhid No. L- 12012/ 145/96.JR (B- 11) ]

TRAINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

BEFORE SHRIGYANENDRAKUMARSHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 ,

CHANDIGARH and wast

Case No. I. D:1125/97

Shri Bal Kishan , R/o . Subhash Nagar , 40/2, Manimajra . Chandigarh

Applicant

Itwas replyofa suggestion made to the workman . It means the management admitted that the workman warked with it but not, continuously . Thus , I am not inclined to accept the contention of the bank that there has been no employer - employee relationship between the workman and the management of the bank. The workman has filed the photocopies of certain vouchers The witness of the management has admitted that the vouchers are the documents of the bank. It has also been contended that vouchers do not bear the name of any person . The vouchers came from the custody of the workman . Thus , unless proved contrary , it shall be presumed that the documents are related to the services rendered by the workman . Moreover , the bank has failed to prove that the documents relates to some other workman or person , then the workman. Thus , considering the oral and documentary evidence , I am of the view that workman has worked with the management ofthe bank from 19-4-1994 to 24-2-1995.

Versus

The Deputy General Manager , Bank of India, Sector- 17 , Manimajra , Chandigarh

Respondent

APPEARANCES

Shri V. K. Vashisthta

For the workm

Ihave calculated the period the workman has worked with the management ofbank. If Sundays , holidays and all the days are counted, it come to the working of 226 days . the workman was engaged with the bank . As per the documents provided by the workman he has just worked 226 days and has not completed 240 days which is the requirement ofthe Act, to proteet the right to work , For the Moncea

Govement of Indiaby exercising is powers under Section 10 of the Industial Disputes ActAct (hereinafter referralas på Act) widematication No. L - 12012/145 /96/ 名物) 15507 , wfferted the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunافض

Thus, as per the provisions of the Act , no notice or retrenchment compensation was required before termination of the services of the workman . It is not the contention of the workman that after his termination some fresh persons were recruited and he was not given the chance.Thus there is no force in the claim of the workman , and the reference is accordingly, disposed off. The termination ofthe workman is lawful and he is not entitled for any relief. Let the Central Government be informed for publication ofthe award , and thereafter, file ba consigned.

G.K. SHARMA, PresidingOfficer Whether the antion of the management ofBank of India rep. through Zenal Manager , Bank of India , Chandigarh in terminating the services of workman [भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ⅱ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 13 अगस्त 2009

का.आ. 2510. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक आफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधि करण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं . 1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 59/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था। is site were chose to the [ सं. एल -12012 /9/2007- आई आर ( बी-11 ) ] sql on राजेन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th August, 2009

S.O: 2510. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 59/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No.1 , Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 12-8-2009 V naspin to snolervore omge And with atthad No: 212012/9 /2007 - IR (B - 11 ) ] mat war on leaRAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDSUTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT NOI , NEW DELHI KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX DELHI ריטמנתמוני No.59/2007 a gnitis Shri Raj Kumar , atdallion wе мные пойти 3/466, Thlokpun , 1 otto 425 shem ber short to not alt ode bas inord at the sinson of hot nudes atravesacainuotis Workmen Tu sghol rond odia llew Mersus duider 5000 γας το The Zonal Manager plint orientale at si Bank ofindiaw on viuibanauh hatima New Delhi Zone , Level V, Tower - 1 , Jeewan Bharti , Connaught Circus , n New Delhi - 11000savenenod ndi shum zisamese grab tamsi.Management Raj Kumar who was working with the Bank ofBaroda, misconducted himself. A charge sheet was issued to him on 13-4-05, An enquiry was conducted and Enquiry Officer concluded that charges stands proved against him, Relying report ofthe Enquiry Officer , the Disciplinary Authority inflicted punishment of discharge from services, with superannuation benefits on him and without disqualification for future employment , Raj Kumar felt aggrieved by the order and raised a dispute before the

5349

REINAD 2

भारतका राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/भाद्र 21, 1931 :

Conciliation Officer .Since conciliation proceedings failed, the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal vide order No.L- 12012 /9/2007 . ( IR ( B - II ) dated 10-7-2007 with following terms:

"Whether the action of the management of Bank ofIndia in imposing the punishment of ( i ) " Censure " in terms of Para 6( h) of the Memorandum of Settlement dated 10. -4-2002 and ( ii ) Discharge from Bank service with superannuation benefits and without disqualification for future employment " in terms of Para 6 ( d) of the Memorandum of Setticinent dated 10-04-2002 on Shri Raj Kumar vide punishment order dated 12-05-2005 is legal and just ? If not, to whatreliefthe concerned workman is entitled?" 2. The appropriate Government directed the workman to file his claim statement within a period of 15 days from the receipt of the order ofthe reference . Before this Tribunal despite directions so issued the workman opted not to file his claim statement .

3 Notice was sent to the workman to file his claim statement before the Tribunal on 9th of July , 2009. Notice was received back with the report that Raj Kumar has left the given address. Notice was sent to Raj Kumar at premises No. 3/466 , Trilokpuri , Delhi - 91 address provided by the appropriate Government in terms of reference . The workman opted not to file his present address before the Tribunal from where he could have been summoned . Therefore, it is evident that the workman left his given address for unknown destination . Under these circumstances the Tribunal could not lay its hands on the workman calling upon him to file his claim statement .

04 Management filed its stand on the terms of reference. It was projected that Raj Kumar committed a misconduct and charge sheet was served upon him on 13-4-05. An enquiry was conducted against him . Enquiry Officer submitted his report , annouricing therein thất the charges stands proved. The Disciplinary Authority gave him personal hearing and inflicted punishment ofdischarge from service with superannuation benefits, without any disqualification from future employment . Therefore , out of facts projected by the management, it came to light that services of Raj Kumar were dispensed with by way of punishment . Principles of Natural Justice were followed; when an enquiry was conducted and punishment of discharge was awarded to him by the Disciplinary Authority.

5. Raj Kumar has not come forward to dispute facts projected by the management . Under these circumstances this Tribunal cannot form an opinion that the action of the management in inflicting punishment of discharge from service with superannuation benefit, without disqualification for future, employment was illegal and unjust. No illegality of any source can be accorded to the 5350

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009 /BHADRA 21 , 1931

workman. An award is accordingly passed . It be sent to theappropriate Government for publication .

Dated: 23-7-2009

Dr. R. K.YADAV, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 13 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2511. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक आफ बड़ौदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधि करण/ श्रम न्ययायालय , लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 08/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -12011/162/2004- आई आर ( बी-11 ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th August, 2009

S.O. 2511.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , ( 14 of 1947) the Central Govemment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 08/2005) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Lucknow, now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management ofBank of Baroda and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 12-8-2009.

[ No. L- 12011/ 162/2004- IR(B - 11 ) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW PRESENT: N. K. PUROHIT , Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 8/2005

Ref. No. L- 12011 /162/2004- IR (B- II) dated: 04-02-2005

BETWEEN

Smt . Anju Devi , W/ o Shri Rakesh Kr . , B- 133 , Rajiv Nagar, Kanchan Bihari Marg Kalyanpur , Lucknow

AND

The General Manager , Bank of Baroda, 19, Way Road , Lucknow.

AWARD

22-07-2009

1. By order No. L- 120 11 / 162/2004 - IR ( B - II ) dated 04-02-2005 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, New Delhi in exercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d) ofsub section ( 1 ) and sub section ( 2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute between Smt . Anju Devi , W/o Shri Rakesh Kr. , B- 133 , Rajiv Nagar, Kanchan Bihari Marg, Kalyanpur ,

[PART 11-SEC . 3( ii ) ] Lucknow and the General Manager , Bank of Baroda, 19 , Way Road, Lucknow for adjudication .

2. The reference under adjudication is:

"Whether the action of the management of Bank of Baroda, Lucknow in terminating Smt . Anju Devi and not allowing her to continue in service as temporary safai karamchari after 20th July, 2002, consequent upon merger of the Banaras State Bank Ltd. with Bank of Baroda were she claimed to have been working with erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. duringthe period from 20-10-1992 to 19-07-2002 . If not , what relief is the disputant concerned is entitled?"

3. The case ofthe workman , in brief, is that she was engaged by the erstwhile Benaras State Bank Limited , Regional Office , Lucknow w.e.f. 20-10-1992 on the post of temporary sweeper and worked as such with initial salary ofRs .440 per month continuously up to 20-07-2002 when she was not allowed to work consequent to merger of the Benaras State Bank Limited with the Bank of Baroda . She has also submitted that termination of her services was against the provisions of Chapter V para 8 of the Amalgamation Scheme , which provided that transferor bank shall continue in service and be deemed to have been appointed in the transferee bank at the same remuneration and on the same terms and conditions of service as were applicable to such employees immediately before the close of business on 22nd January, 2002. It has been submitted by the workman that she worked continuously for more than 11 years with the Benaras State Bank Limited and was getting salary@ Rs . 740 at the time of termination of her services; hence she was entitled to get protection of Section 25-F of the 1.D. Act, 1947. It has been alleged by the workman that some of the juniors are still in employment with the bank and also , the Bank of Baroda had made payment amounting to Rs . 469 towards salary for the month ofJuly , 2002, which shows that well in the knowledge of the Bank that she was on the rolls of erstwhile Benaras . State Bank Limited. Accordingly the workman has prayed that she be reinstated in the Bank of Baroda with all consequential benefits .

4. The management of the Bank of Baroda has filed its written statement denying the averments made the workman in her statement of claim . It has been submitted by the management that the workman was engaged by the erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. which was not in the knowledge of the Bank of Baroda at the time of amalgamation, hence has denied the date of her engagement and continuance without any break . Further, it has been submitted by the Bank that in terms of Chapter V para 8 of the Amalgamation Scheme all the employees of transferor bank were allowed to continue their service and were deemed to have been appointed in the transferee Bank; accordingly, all the employees whose names find place in [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

the list provided by the erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. Benaras State Bank Ltd. , the genuineness of the claim of were allowed to continue in terms of the Scheme and since the name of the workman was not existing in the list of employees ofthe erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. being a temporary part time workman , therefore , there arise no question of either allowing or not allowing her to continue in the services of the Bank or violation of any of the provisions ofAmalgamation Scheme or 1. D. Act . As regard payment of Rs . 469 the management of the Bank has submitted that on receipt of an application from the workman addressed to the Regional Manager, erstwhile the workman was checked and it was found that the workman had worked with erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. for 19 days in July, 2002 before the Amalgamation , therefore, she was paid accordingly ; whereas it has denied of continuing any other employee junior to the workman. Thus , the management of the Bank of Baroda has prayed that claim of the workmen be rejected out rightly.

5. The workman has submitted its rejoinder wherein apart from reiterating the facts already stated in the statement of claim it has specifically mentioned that one similarly situated employee Shri Shailendra Kumar Bharti , who was working in the Cantt Branch of the bank, though junior to the workman , was not only retained by the opposite party but later his , services were regularized.

6. The parties filed documentary evidence in support oftheir respective case . The workman examined herself whereas the opposite party examined Sh. Ravish Chandra , Officer , Bank of Baroda to sustain their case . Both the parties filed written argument apart from oral submissions.

7.Heard learned representatives of both parties and perused entire material on record .

8. The learned representative on behalf of the workman that the workman remained in service of erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. , and rendered her services more than 11 years continuously from 20-12-92 to 20-7-2002 and had worked more than 240 days in every year but her services have been terminated in violation of Section 25F of the ID. Act . He has further contended that in Para 8 of Chapter 5 of the amalgamation scheme , there is clear provision to the effect that all of the employees of transferee bank shall continue in service and were deemed to have been appointed in the transferee bank at the same remuneration and on the same terms and conditions of the service as were applicable to such employees immediately closed of the business on erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. , on 22-1-2002. He has also contended that Sri Shailendra Kumar Bharti , who was junior to workman is still continue with the transferee bank. Bank of Baroda and this fact has beenadmitted by the witness ofthe management . The bank has adopted unfair labour practice of depriving the workman with status of permanent workman . In support of his contention he has placed reliance on following case laws ;

5351

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

1 . 1976 AIR SC 1111 : SBI vs Sundra Money 2. 1989 SCC ( L& S) 565: Narottam Chopra Vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court and others .

3. 2008 ( 117) FLR 408 Full Bench Guj . H.C. Tourism Corpn .OfGujarat Ltd. Vs Kalu Valji Jethwa 4. 2008 ( 119) FLR 398 SC'Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs A.Sankaralingam .

9. Per contra, the learned representative on behalf ofthe bank has veghmently argued that the workman was a part time Safai Karmchari in the erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. and used to come in office for only for 1 or 2 hours and her name was not in the attendance register of theerstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. She was not workman as per definition of the workman under the I.D. Act. There was no employer employee relationship between the Bank ofBaroda and the workman Smt. Anju Devi . She was never employed or engaged by the Bank of Baroda, therefore, there arises no question of her termination of his service by Bank of Baroda . He has further urged that the name of the workman was not in pay roll of the erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. , therefore , as per amalgamation scheme she was not taken on rolls of the Bank of Baroda. He has also submitted that except her own statement , the workman have not submitted any documents to establish that she had worked for more than 240 days . He has also submitted that premises where she was engaged as part time job worker, ceased to function and exist and premises was closed therefore , her discontinuation can not be termed as retrenchment . He has placed reliance on .

"Managing Director, Haryana Seeds Development Corpn. Vs Presiding Officer AIR 1997 page 3086 and others and 2006 ( 110 ) FLR page 548 Surendra Nagar Distt. Panchayat & an other vs Ganga Ben Lalji Bhai & others . " 10. I havegiven mythoughtful consideration on rival submissions of both the sides .

11. Admittedly, the workman was a part time sweeper erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. , went into Moratorium and vide extra ordinary Gazette Notification dtd . 19-6-2002 a scheme of amalgamation of the erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. , with the Bank of Baroda with certain terms and conditions was sanctioned and the erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. , seized to exist and function w.e.f. 20-6-2002 .

12. Sub para 8 of the Chapter 5th of the Amalgamation Scheme reads as under;

Continuation of services ofthe employees:

( 1) All the employees of transferor bank shall continue in service and be deemed to have been appointed in the transferee bank at the same remuneration and on the same terms and conditions of service , as were applicable to such employees immediately before the close of business on the 22 January, 2002.

5352

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART 11 SEC. 3(ii ) ]

aworkman under Section 2(s) of the I.D. Act . Hon'ble Apex Court has held that a part time workman is covered within definition& Section 2( s) of the Act and such workmen are entitled to the benefit of continuous service under Section 25 B and the benefite of Section 25F of the Act . Thus , in the light of said principle laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court , the contention of the learned representative on behalf of thebank that as a part time sweeper she was not a workman under Section 2(s ) is not sustainable .

Provided that the employees of the transferor bank, who have by notice in writing given to the transferor or the, transferee bank at any time before the expiry of one month next following the date on which the scheme has been sanctioned by the Central Government, intimated their intention of not becoming employees of the transferee bank , shall be entitled to the payment of such compensation , if any, under the provisions, of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947( 14 of 1947) and such pension , gratuity, provident fund and other retirement benefits as may be ordinarily admissible under the rules of authorizations of the transferor bank as in force immediately before the close of business on 22 January2002.

(2) The transferee bank shall , in respect of the employees of the transferor bank who are deemed to have been appointed as employees of the transferee bank , be deemed also to have taken over the liability for them of retrenchment compensation in the event of their being retrenched while in the service of the transferee bank on the basis that their service has been continuous and has not been interrupted by their transfer to the transferee bank .

15. The case of the workman is that she had worked continuously in the earstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd., from 20-10-92 to 19-7-02 as part time sweeper. The learned representative on behalf of the bank has submitted that except her own statement on oath , there is no other oral or documentary evidence to substantiate her statement that she had continuously worked for the said period. It is true that except the affidavit of the workman , there is no documentary evidence on the record to establish that the workman had worked continuously from 20-10-92 to 19-7-02 but the management witness Sri Ravish Chandra , Accounts Officer has admitted in his cross examination thatwhen he was posted in 1997 in the erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. , the workman was working there and from 1997 to the date of amalgation , the workman had worked in the erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. Therefore , it is established from the evidence of the management witness that she was continuously working there as part time sweeper since 1997 and she had worked more than 240 days during that period in preceding twelve months from the date of alleged disengagement .

(3) The transferee bank shall , on the expiry of a period not longer than three years from the date on which the schme is sanctioned , pay or grant to the employees of the transferor bank,whose services are continued the transferee bank under sub paragraph ( 1 ) the same remuneration and the same terms and condition , rank or status of the transferee bank subject to the qualifications and experience of the said employees of the transferor bank being the same as or equivalent to those of such other employees of the transferee bank. "

16. It is also admitted case of the management that on receipt of claim for payment of 19 days the same was paid to the workman vide cheque dt. 12-4-03 and the said payment was made for the period 1-7-02 to 19-7-02 by the Bank of Baroda . The amalgamation scheme was sanctioned vide Notification dt . 19-6-2002 and the erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. , was merged with the Bank ofBaroda w.e.f. 20-6-2002 and subsequent to the said amalgamation , the Bank ofBaroda has paid the wages of the workman from 1-7-2002 to 19-7-2002.

13 Upon a perusal of the above para 8 of the amalgamation scheme , it is evident that employees of transferee bank shall continue in the services and be deemed to have been appointed in the transferee i.e. Bank of Baroda .

17. The contention of the learned representative on behalf of the bank is also not tenable that the employees whose names find place in the list of the erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. , were continued in the Bank of Baroda in terms of the scheme and were deemed to have been employed . Since the name of the workman was not on the rolls of the erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd :, as she was working only as part time sweeper therefore , under amalgamation she cannot deemed to have been employed by the Bank of Baroda. As soon as the original office of erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. , seized to exist , the function of temporary part time job of the workman also cameto an end. Admittedly, the workman was working as parttime sweeper in the erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. , on the said date .

14. The workman Smt . Anju Devi has stated that she was working in the erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. , as temporary Safai Karmchari . Initialy she was being paid Rs.440 per month subsequently that amount enhanced to Rs.740 per month . The management witness Sri Ravish Chandra has admitted that workman Smt . Anju Devi was working in the erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. , as casual worker . He has stated that she used to work from 9-9.15 AM to 10-10.30 AM. In 2008 ( 119) FLR 398 the question under consideration was whether the respondent who was appointed as sweeper cum water carrier in the office ofappellant and was employed on part time basis , is भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

18. Para 8 of the amalgamation scheme envisages that all the employees of transfer bank shall continue in servicebe deemed to have been appointed in the transferee bank at the same remuneration and on the same terms and conditions of the service as were applicable on 22-01-02. As stated earlier though the workman was a part time sweeper but she was workman within the definition under Section 2(s) ofthe I.D. Act . It is also established from the evidence of the management witness that since 1997, she was continuously working in the erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. It is also established that from 1-7-02 to 19-7-02 the payment of the workman have been paid by the transferee bank, i.e. the Bank of Baroda for the period from 1-7-2002 to 19-7-2002 after amalgamation. In amalgamation scheme there is no clasue on the basis of which it can be inferred that workman under section 2( s ) should not be consideredas an employee ofthe transferee bank & as per Hon'ble Apex Court verdict part time worker is also workman under section 2(s) of the I.D. Act, therefore, the workman should have been deemed to be appointed by the transferree bank at the same remuneration and same terms and conditions as were applicable on 22-1-02 .

19.As per principle laid down the Hon'ble Apex Court in 2008 ( 119) FLR 398 part time workman would be covered within the definition the Section 2 (s) of the Act and he would be entitled to benefit of continuous service under section 25B and the benefit of Section 25F of the Act . In AIR 1996 SC 1111 Hon'ble Apex Court has observed that termination for any reason whatsoever in Section 2(00 ) are the key words whatever the reason, every terminations spells retrenchment. Once it is established that the workman hadworked for more than 240 days in the stipulated period, their services can not be terminated without compliance of Section 25F of the I.D. Act . It is not the case of the Bank that any notice or compensation in lieu of notice was ever given to the workman before her disengagement .

20,This contention of the learned representative on behalf of the Bank is also not tenable that in the case of closure under section 25 (0) of 1. D. Act provision ofSection 25F are not applicable. In the instant case , the closure is not under section 25 ( 0) of the I.D. Act . It is a case of amalgamation of erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. , with Bank of Baroda & as per scheme of amalgamation the employees ofthe erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. , have been deemed to be the employee of the Bank of Baroda. Therefore, on the ground of merger erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. , it can not be said that provision of Section 25F arenot applicalbe.

21. It is established that workman had worked for more than 240 days during preceding twelve months from the date of her disengagement i.e. 20-7-2002 and as per definition of the workman under section 2 (s) of the I.D. Act, she is workman. It is as established that even after amalgamation ofthe erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. with Bank of Baroda , the payment of wages for the period 1-7-2002 to 19-7-2002 has been made by the Bank ofBaroda.

3175 G1/09-24

5353 Thus, action of the Bank in not allowing the workman to : continue in service as temporary Safai Karamchari after 20-7-2002 is unjustified & in violation of Section 25F of the I.D. Act, but while giving reliefthis fact can not be ignored that she was working only as part time sweeper . The nature ofjob, the period during which she was working as part time worker and keeping in view the fact that erstwhile Benaras State Bank Ltd. , where she was working, is merged with the Bank of Baroda on the basis of amalgamation scheme and having regard to all the facts and circumstances ofthe case instead of reinstating her as temporary Safai Karmchari or part time sweeper the interest of justice will be subserved by paying compensation to the workman instead and in place of relief of reinstatement in service.

22. In (2005) 5 SCC 591 : 205 SCC (L&S) 716between Haryana Roadways V. Rudhan Singh Hon'ble Apex Court while considering the question regarding award of back wages has observed;

There is not rule of thumb in every case where the Industrial Tribunal gives a finding that the termination ofservice was in violation of Section 25F of the Act , entire backwages should awarded...............However , where the total length of service renered by a workmanis very small , the award of back wages for the complete period i.e. from the date oftermination till the date ofthe award, which our experience shows is often quite large , would be wholly inappropriate . Another important factor , which required to be taken into consideration, is the nature of employment . A regular service of permanent character cannot be compared to short or intermittent daily wage employment though it may be for 240 days in a calander year.

23. In2008(119) FLR 877 Deepak Ganpat Tari V.N.E. Theater Pvt. Ltd. Hon'ble Bombay High Court relying on the Hon'ble Apex Court's judgement in 2008 ( 117 ) FLR 1086 (SC) AP V. K. Brahmandanadam 2008 ( 118 ) FLR 376 (SC) Telephone DM Vs Keshab Deb 2006 ( 111 ) FLR 1.178 (SC) JDAV. Ram Sahai , while awarding compensation to the concerned workman considering his daily wages and inview of the period of service, has observe .

"Itisapparent that termination of services of a daily wager does not amount to retrenchment and for violation of Section 25F in such circumstances , the employee cannot be given benefit of reinstatement with continuity and back wages . Hon'ble Apex Court has hold that in such circumstance employee is entitled to benefit of compesation only. " 24. In the light of principle laid down in aforementioned case laws and having regard to entire facts and circumstances of the case the ends of justice would meet by paying compensation to the workman instead and inplace ofrelief ofreinstatement in service .

25. Since the action of management of Bank of Baroda in disengaging the workman and not allowing her 5354

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[ PART H-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

Bank ofBaroda FGUTPPBranch,

2. Shri S. K. Paulaputes, eft to be noti Unchahar , Raibareilly - 229406 .

AWARD

to continue in service as temporary Safai Karmchari is not justified , the workman is entitled to get a sum of Rs . 7000 (Rs . Seven Thousand Only) as compensation from theBank concerned. The said amount should be paid to the workman within 8 weeks from the date of publication of the award failing which the same shall carry interest @ 8% per annum.

21-7-2009 вие педоме 26. The reference under adjudication be answered accordingly.

27. Award as above .

LAMARO ft

Lucknow

?????????? ??????????? 3of 2013 - dow

22-7-2009

N. K. PUROHIT, PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली, 13 अगस्त, 2009

1. By order No..L - 12011 /283 /2003- IR( B - II) Dated 3-3-2004 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour , NewDelhi in exercise of powers conferredby clause (d) of sub-section (1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. ( 14 of 1947 ) referred this industrial dispute between the General Secretary , Bank of Baroda StaffAssociation UP , Madhav Bhawan , 15/222 /A , Civil Lines, Kanpur ( U.P.) (Espousing cause of Shri Shankar Lal) and the Asstt. General Manager , Bank of Baroda, Regional Office, 19 , Way Road, Lucknow for adjudicatión. The said reference order was registered as: I.D. No. 39/2004 and during the pendency of the said industrial dispute the workman , Shankar Lal filed present application under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 का. आ. 2512.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक आफ बडौदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधि करण , लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 11/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12011 /283/2003 - आई आर ( बी -11 ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th August, 2009

2. The case of the workman in brief is that an industrial disputes under Section 10 of the 1.D. Act is pending before this Tribunal and the opposite parties i.e. management of the Bank of Baroda during pendency of the reference for adjudication before this Tribunal has wrongly, illegally and in most arbitrary manner has changed his service conditions whereby has violated provisions contained in Section 33 ofthe 1.D. Act .

AS.O. 2512.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref . No. 11 / 2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal , Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management ofBank of Baroda and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 12-8-2009.

[No. L- 12011 /283 /2003 - IR( B- II ) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer ANNEXURER VARE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

3. It has been submitted by the workman that earlier up to December, 2005 he has getting scale wages under salary head , which purports that he was an employee of the Bank; but the management of the Bank , during the pendency of said industrial dispute, has discontinued the practice and has started, payment of wages asas labour charges under Sundry Head' instead of ' Salary Head ' . This has led to change in service condition ofthe workman from an employee of the bank to the outside labour, by change ofmode of payment of wages under head ' Salary' to ' Sundry' Accordingly , the workman has prayed that some suitable order be passed .

Present : N. K. Purohit, Presiding Officer I.D. No. 11/2006

BETWEEN

Shankar Lal S/ o Mohan Lal

R/ o Village Paraspur, Post Jawai , Distt. Raibarielly.

AND

1. Shri Ulhas Shanker Assistant General Manager Bank of Baroda RegionalOffice 19,WayRoad, Luckow

4. Per contra the management of the Bank ofBaroda has disputed the claim of the workman's union by filing its written statement wherein it has submitted that since the workman was never appointed in the bank in any cadre whatsover, rather he was engaged by the branch without sanction of the Competent Aothority as casual labour on part time basis as step gap arrangement and this does not make him entitled to claim any benefit from bank. It has been submitted by the Bank that the employees of the bank who are appointed by following recruitment. rules are being paid from Salary Head' whereas remuneration whatsoever paid to the workman is for the work being done by him as casual labour therefore same is being paid 5355

3771SAD HEY

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/भा : 21, 193110

from Sundry Charges, hence, there is no change in service. conditions or violation of any of the provisions of the LD. Act as alleged by the workman , Accordingly the management of the Bank has prayed to reject the application of the workman being not maintainable .

5. The workman's union has filed rejoinder whereby it has only reiterated his averments in the statement of claim and has not introduced any new fact .

illegal and unjustified. The workman does not want to adduce any oral evidence in support oftheir case. However, the workman concerned has requested for leave of the Tribunal to withdraw the case vide affidavit dated 14-7-2009 (W- 32 ) , stating therein that a settlement has been arrived between the union of the workman and bank on 18-3-2008 regarding regularization ofthe workmen and the bank has agree upon to regularize the workman in respect of I.D. No. 39/2004; and accordingly, there is no need to proceed with the present application under Section 33 of the I.D. Act as grievances of the workman stands redressed. Thus , the representative of the workman's union has prayed to pass suitable orders .

6. After submission of documentary evidence in support of their respective cases by the parties , the workman was given opportunity to lead evidence in support of its averments , but on the date fixed, the workman did not forward any evidence in support of his case rather filedapplication for withdrawal ofcase (W-31 ) along with affidavit ofthe workman (W -32 ); accordingly, the authorized representative of the management stated not to adduce any evidence in rebuttal .

7. Heard the representative of the parties and perused entire evidence on record.

10.Although provisions ofwithdrawal of suits under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC are not applicable in the matter of industrial disputes under ID Act but, in view of the submissions of the workman's union for withdrawal of the case, there is no grievance left with the workman . Resultantly, no relief is required to be given to the workman concerned. The application under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is decided accordingly.

11. Award as above .

Lucknow

21-07-2009

Park K. PUROHIT , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 19 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2513.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार रीजनल प्रोविडेंट फंड कमिश्नर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 60/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ditova langa

[सं. एल-42011/66/99 - आई आर ( की यू) ] सुरेन्द्रसिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 19th August , 2009

8. The workman in its affidavit ( W 32) has stated that a settlement has been arrived between the union of the workman and bank on 18-03-2008 regarding regularization of the workmen and the bank has agreed upon to regularize the workman , which is admitted to the authorized representative of the bank to the extent that a settlement has been arrived between the union of the workmen and barik on 18-03-2008 regarding regularization of the workmen . As regard Bank's agreement to regularization workman is concerned it has been submitted by the authorized representative of the management that the management of the bank has to regularize only those workmenwhose name finds reference in the said settlement subject to fulfillment of certain conditions . Since list of workmen and copy of the said settlement is not on the record, therefore , whether , the name of workman finds reference in the settlement or not is to be verified. The workman has stated that since his union in view of the settlement, has already submitted that there is no need to proceed with the industrial dispute pending before it for adjudication i.e. I.D. No. 39/2004 and accordingly, has expressed itswillingness to withdraw the dispute with the leave of the Tribunal , therefore , the present application under Section 33 A of the 1.D. Act may also be allowed to be withdrawn .

S.O.2513. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 60/2000) oftheCentral Government, Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court No. 1, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial. Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 19-8-2009ow to mindinch

ods butirrerumni a zhhe ( No. L-42011 /66/99- IR(DU) } of Bule gratto sulSURENDRA SINGH, DeskOfficer 9. It is well settled that if a party challenges the legality of an action, the burden lies upon him to prove illegality ofthe action ofthe management and if no evidence is produced the party invoking jurisdiction of the Court must fail. In the instant case the burden was on the workman to prove that the action of the management of Bank of Baroda in changing his service condition during pendency of reference under adjudication before this Tribunal , was 5356

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] ANNEXURE

the strength of the work . In view of the above settlement , theUnion withdraw the present reference in Lok Adalat . Central Governmentbe informed. File be consigned .

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDSUTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM -LABOUR COURT

Chandigarh

NO . I, CHANDIGARH

31-07-2009

Case No. I.D. 60/2000

G.K. SHARMA, PresidingOfficer General Secy.

EmployeesPresident Fund Staff Union

नई दिल्ली , 19 अगस्त, 2009

House No. 316, Sector 30 -A,

ProvidentEmployees Colony,

...Applicant

Chandigarh

Versus

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Sector- 17E,

Chandigarh

.Respondent

APPEARANCES

का. आ. 2514. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार पी जी आई एम ई आर , चण्डीगढ़ के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 1343/2007) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

Fortheworkman : Shri Vijay Sharma

[ सं. एल-42012/43/2007-आई आर( डी यू) ] For the Management : Shri S. K. Aggarwal

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्कअधिकारी AWARD

Passed on 31-7-2009

New Delhi , the 19th August, 2009 Central Government vide notification No. L -42011 / 66/99 - IR( DU ), dated 27-1-2000, has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

"Whether the action of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner , Chandigarh in denying the under mentioned three demands of the Employees Provident Staff Union . Chandigarh is legal and justified?

S. O. 2514.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.1343/ 2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court , No.1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of PGIMER , Chandigarh and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19-8-2009 .

Demand No.1

[No. L-42012/43/2007 - IR (DU) ]

SURENDERA SINGH, Desk Officer Stoppage of harassment and victimization of staff members as well as activities ofthe Union -revocation ofActs of victimization against the office bearers of the union.

ANNEXURE

Demand No. 2

BEFORE SHRIGYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, Equal distribution of work among dealing hands particularly in Accounts Section and providing staff strength as per norms .

PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT -I , CHANDIGARH

Demand No. 3

Case No. I.D. 1343/2007

Shri Ravi Kumar , S/ o Shri Charan Dass , H.No. 2764 , Sector 20/C, Chandigarh .

Obtaining immediate sanction of competent authorities for creation of additional staff in accordance with the work load as on 3-3-97 in various cadres including Class ' D ' staff for ensuring better services to E.P.F. subscribers .

.....Applicant If not to what relief the Union entitled to ?"

Versus

1. TheMedical Superitendent , Nehru Hospital , PGIMER , Sector 12, Chandigarh .

2. M/s A. N. Kapoor Janitors ( P) Ltd. , room No. 32 , Nehru

Sarai , PGIMER, Sector 12, Chandigarh .

3. The Director , PGIMER, Sector 12, Chandigarh .

2. Case taken in lok Adalat . It is settled between the parties that there was no alleged harassment and victimization of the staff members of the Union and officer bearer of the Union . It is further settled that proper distribution of work amongst the staff will be assured and the competent authority has already recommended the creation of post, once again a reminder/efforts shall be made to the competent authority for creation of post as per

....Respondent 5357 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

ANNEXURE

APPEARANCES

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, For the Workman

: Sh. R. K. Singh

For the Management : Shri M. M. Putney

AWARD

PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1, CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D. 111/2000

Passed on 27-7-09

Shri Rameshwar S/o Shri Sher Singh, H. No. 353/252 , Ward No. 8, Old Station , Matawali Padawb Mohalla , Gujran , Hissar- 125001 .

Central Government vide notification No. L -42012/ 43/2007 - IR (DU) Dated. 30-11-07 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-

.....Applicant.

Versus

The director , Central Institute for research on Buffaloes, Hissar- 125001 .

Whether the action of the Management of M/s . A. N. (Janitors ) Pvt. Ltd. a contractor of the Nethru Hospital , PGIMER, in terminating the services of their workman Shri Ravi Kumar w.e.f. 5-1-2007, is legal and justified ? Ifnot , to what reliefthe workman is entitled to ?"

....Respondenl

APPEARANCES

Forthe Workman

: Sh . Sandeep Bhardwaj

: Sh . R. K. Sharma

For the Management

AWARD

2. Case taken up in Lok Adalat . After long discussion , the workman withdraw his reference on the condition that when ever any contract for any work will be available to the contractor Shri A.N. Kapoor, the workman will be provided with the work ofthe same nature on which hewas working on priority. In view ofthe above settlement the present reference is disposed off as settled. Central Government be informed. File be consigned.

Passed on 4-8-09

Chandigarh. 27-7-2009

G.K. SHARMA, PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली , 19 अगस्त, 2009

Government of India vide notification No. L -42012/ 247/99 - IR (DU) Dated 17-2-2000 by exercising its powers under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter refereed as an Act) referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :-

"Whether the action ofthe Director , Central Institute for Research on Buffaloes ( ICAR), Hissar ( Haryana ) in terminating the services of Shri Rameshwar S/o Shri Sher Singh, daily rated workman w.e.f. 28-3-1998 is legal and justified ? Ifnot , to what relief the workman is entitled and fromwhich date ? "

का. आ. 2515.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार केन्द्रीय भैंस अनुसंधान संस्थान के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नंः । , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 111/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल-42012/247/99- आई आर ( डी यू) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 19th August , 2009

It is the contention of the workman that he was engaged as daily waged Chowkidar on 3-9-89 by the respondent . His services were terminated on 1-9-1991 without any notice or retrenchment compensation . On 18-9-91 a demand notice was served and on account of failure of conciliation report, in the office of the ALC (Rohtak), the Government of India referred the reference to this Tribunal which was registered as ID No. 132/1993 . During the pendency of this reference , a settlement was entered between the management and union of workers in which it was agreed that all the workers whose cases.are pending in the Court shall be taken to the work subject to with drawing of casses .

S. O. 2515. in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.111 / 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , No.1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Institute for Research on Buffaloes and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19-8-2009 .

The workman withdrew the case and he was reinstated into the services as Chowkidar on 16-7-1997, The services of the workman were again terminated on 27-3-98 to prevent him to complete 240 days ofwork in the preceding year from the date of the termination . The [No. L-42012/247 /99- IR(DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer 5358

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART, II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] workman has mentioned some dates falling on holidays he worked without any wages. No compensatory leave in lieu ofwork onholidays were given . The act ofthe management isunlawful labour practice as his services were terminated against the terms of settlement between the parties while this settlement was in operation..

thatsovereign functions strictly understood cannot alone qualify the exemption , nor the welfare activites or economic advantage undertaken by government or statutory bodies . Even in departments discharging sovereign functions, if there are units which qualified to be the industry and they are substantially sevegral then , they ean be considered to come within Section 2 ( J) in the definitions of Industry.

Onthe basis ofthe nature of work carried on by the management of respondent , the respondent is an industry. As perthe law laid down by the Supreme Court in Banglore Water Supply Case every research institute cannot seck exemptionfrom the term industry .

The management challenged its nature as industry. The facts as such have not been denied except that no unlawful act was done by the management. It is contended that on some of the holidays work was taken by the management and the wages were paid . The workman has not completed 240 days of work in the preceding years from the date ofhis termination .

First ofall , it will be proper to answer the preliminary objection raised by the management that it is not an industry.

Moreover, if any research institute have number of units, as per the law laid down by the Apex Court in Banglore Water Supply Case ( supra ), one unit may come within the definition of industry, whereas , another unit on the basis of the functions discharge and activities earried on, ean seek exemption . Thus , on the basis of the functioning of the respondent and , the work which was diseharged by the workman , assigned to him by the management , I am of the view that as per the ratio of the judgment of the Sepreme Court in Banglore Water Supply Case (supra), the management is an industry.

The term ' industry' has been defined in Section 2 (j ) of the Act, to mean any business, trade , undertaking, manufacturing or calling upon employers and includes any calling, services , employment, handicraft or industrial occupation or avocation of workmen. In Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. A. Rajappa and others AIR, 1978 Supreme Court 548 , seven Judges Bench of Hon'ble the Apex Court has defined the word ' Industry' . As per the above mentioned law laid down by the Apex Court, industry has defined in Sub- section 2 (j ) as a wide term and import as : -

(a) Where there is (i ) systematic activity, ( ii ) organized by co- operation between employer and employee (thedirect and substantial element is chimerical) , and ( iii ) for the production and /or distribution of goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes (not spiritual or religious but inclusive of material things or services gearedto cèlestial bliss) , prima facie , there is an industry in the enterprise.

It is true that workman has not completed 240 days ofwork in the preceding year from the date of his second termination . But this is not the issue in this reference . The issue is that the services of the workman were terminated on 18-9-1991 and during the pendency of an industrial dispute I.D. No. 132/1993 , before this vary Tribunal , there was a settlement between the union of the workman and themanagement . On the basis of the settlement the services ofthe workman were reinstated on 16-7-1997 , but reasons known to the management his services were terminated once again on 27-3-1998 . It is the contention ofthe workman that his serviceswere terminated to prevent him to complete 240 days of work and by doing so the management prevented the workman from the legislative embargo for the protection of the right work.

(b) Absence of profit motive or gainful objective is irrelevant , be the venture in the public, joint, private or other sector .

The law relating to the out of Court settlement is mentioned under Section 18 and 19 of the Act. Section 18 ( 1) ofthe Act reads as under:-

(c) The true focus is funetional and the decisive test inthe nature ofthe activity with special emphasis on the employer -employee relations .

"A settlement arrived at by agreement between the employer and workman otherwise than in the course of eonciliation proceeding shall be binding on the parties to the agreement" .

(d) Ifthe organization is a trade or business it does not cease to be one because of philanthropy animating the undertaking.

Sub-section 3 of Section 18 reads as under:

Thus, the test ( specially triple test) referred and relied uponby Hon'ble the Apex Court in Bangalore Water Supply case (supra) , are necessary to qualify any institution to be anindustry.

"A settlement arrived at in the course of conciliation proceedings under this Act [ er an arbitration award in a casewhere a notification has been issued under sub- section (3A) ofSection 10A] of [ an award of a Labour Court , tribunal or National Tribunal ] which has beeome enforceable shall be binding on : -

Regarding the soverign functions, Hon'ble the Apex Court in Banglore Water Supply Case (supra) , has held 3359

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12 2009/ भाद्र 21; 19310 S

[भाग II- खण्ड ( ii) ]

(a) All parties to the industrial dispute ;

(b) All other parties summoned to appear in the proceedings as parties to the dispute, unless the Board, (arbitrator ) ( Labour Court, Tribunal or National tribunal ) , as the case may be, records the opinion that they were so summoned without proper cause ; retos no le vot

is very well clear from the plain reading of Section 19 (2 ) that even after six months the settlement will be binding on the parties and any party who chooses to see off the settlement has to give two months notice to other party showing his intention for termination of settlement . In this case no such notice waswas given by the respondent, which made the settlement binding upon both of the parties even after six months2005

(c) where a party referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) cis an employer, his heirs, successors or assigns win respect of the establishment to which the dispute relates ;

The intention of the management is very well cicar that to frustrate the proceedings in ID No. 132/93, it entered into a settlement to provide the services to all the workman whose cases were pending . When the workman withdrew the cases the settlement was enforced by the management and services ofthe workman were reinstated: Bui fust after six months his services were again terminated without notice, one month wages in lieu of notice or retroschment compensation . It is unlawful labour practice as well as the violation of the provisions of Section 18 and 19 of the Act .

(d) where a party referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) is composed of workmen , all persons who were employed in the establishment or part of the establishment, as the case may be, to which the dispute relates on the date of the dispute and all persons who subsequently become employed in that establishment of patrastos to pol

Moreover, inhis evidence Shri Anil Bihari , M. W. I , has admitted that the persons engaged after the engagement of the workman are still working. It is the violation of the rule offirst cothe fast goes 02 The cumulative effect of the legislative provisions mentioned under Section 18 ( 1 ) and (3 ) , it is clear that a settlement entered between the parties otherwise then in conciliation proceedings has to be honored by the parties The period of enforceability of settlement is mentioned in Section 19 of the Act. Sub - section 1 & 2 of Section 19 reads as underglish sonianus aid

topOn the basis of the above observation, bam ofthe View that the termination of the workman, was void and illegal being against the provisions of the Act . Juniors to workman were retained in service (as admitted by MEWA) , whereas, the services of the workmanswere terminated:The management has failed to horior the settlementand is girilty of the violation of the provisions of Section 18 and 19 of the Astor امار

section19 ( 1 ) " A settlemefit shall come into operation on such date as is agreed upon by the parties to the dispute, and if no date is agreed upon, on the date on which the memorandum of the settlement is singed by the parties to the dispute bomes у соли како во

(2)- "Such settlement shall be binding for such period as is agreed upon by the parties, and if no such period is agreed upon, for a period of six monthssix months ( from the date on which the memorandum of settlement is singed by the parties to the dispute ), and shall continue to be binding on the parties after the expiry ofthe period aforesaid, until the expiry of two months from the date on which a notice in writing ofan intention to terminate the settlement is given by one of the parties to the other party or parties to the Settlements for it and no

The life of this settlement as per the provisions of sub-section 2 of Section 19 is the period given in the settlement itself. Ifno party is given, the life ofsettlement is six months during which it cannot be set aside by any unilateral act of any party. Any of the party is at liberty after the period of six months to give twomonths notice for termination of the settlement .

Inthis reference, the services of the workman were terminated after six months . But intention of the legislation

Wherever , it comes of the notice ofthe Tribunal that the termination ofthe workman is void and illegal , there are two possible remedies available. Firstly , the management may be directed to reinstate the workman with or without back,wages, and secondly, the workman may be corppensated by a reasonable amount of compensation based on reasonable criteria It is a sound principle of service jurisprudence that priority should be given for protection ofright to work and in exceptional circumstances like where there is no work available with the management , the workman may be ordered to be compensated byla reasonable amount of compensation . In this case , admittedly (statement of M WI ) the work is available whole of the year. Under such circumstances, it will be proper to direct the management to reinstate the services of the workman with full back wages . As stated earlier, the management has deliberately in violation of the provisions of Section 18 and 19 of the Act, failed to honor the settlement entered intobetween both ofthe parties and terminated the services oftheworkman to prevent him to complete 240 days , which is an unlawful labour practice . Accordingly , the 5360

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12, 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

AWARD

Passed on 4-8-09

management is directed to reinstate the services of the workmanwithin one month from the date of the publication ofthe award with full back wages . Let Central Government be informed for publication of the award , and thereafter, filebe consigned.

G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer

Government of India vide Notification No. L-40012/ 28/98 - IR (DU) Dated 30-10-1998 , by exercising its powers under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter refered as an Act) , referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :-

नई दिल्ली , 19 अगस्त, 2009

"Whether the action ofthe Management of Telecom interminating the services ofShri Ravinder Kumar S /o Shri Ram Lal , Beldar is legal and justified ? Ifnot, to what relief theworkman is entitled ?"

का. आ. 2516. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 9/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल -40012/28/98- आई आर ( डी यू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी

It isalleged by the workman that he was appointed as ' beldar' in the department of communication at Mehatpur, District Una, on 9-10-95 . He was appointed on daily rates basis and was drawing Rs . 45.75 per day as his salary. His services were terminated on 5-6-1996 without notice, retrenchment compensation or one month wages in lieu of notice. Juniors to him were retained in the service, whereas, his services were terminated by the department against the provisions of Section 25G and 25H of the Act .

New Delhi , the 19th August, 2009

The opposite party denied the facts alleged by the workman in his statement of claim by filing the written statement . It was stated by the opposite party that neither anyjunior was retained in the service nor the workman has completed240 days in the preceding year from the date of his termination. It was further alleged bythe opposite party thatinthe preceding year he just worked interminently for 164 days for which he was paid the wages.

S. O. 2516.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.9/99)of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cuin -Labour Court, No.1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation tothe management of Department of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19-8-2009.

[No. L-40012/28/98- IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1, CHANDIGARH

Parties were afforded the opportunity for adducing evidence . The workman himself filed his affidavit and was cross-examined by learned counsel for the opposite party on 8-10-2001 . Likewise , Shri J.L. Chandla, Divisional Engineer Administration filed his affidavit and was cross- examined by learned counsel for the workman on 11-5- 2005.Certaindocuments were filed by the management as well as the workman . The documents includes certificates . givenby the officers ofthe opposite party to the workman, photocopy of the attendance sheet, certain other orders passed by the management etc.

Case No. I. D. 9/99

Shri Ravinder Kumar, S/o Shri Ram Lal , V & P.O. Basdehra, Teh & Distt . Una (H.P. )

.....Applicant

Versus

The Telecom District Manager , Hamirpur (Distt.)

....Respondent

APPEARANCES

For theWorkman

: Sh. Dinesh Kumar

: Shri K. K. Thakur

For the Management

It is the settled law of service jurisprudence that workman has to prove by some cogent evidence that he worked with the management for 240 days or more in the preceding year from the date ofhis termination, and even if hehasworked less than this , any junior to him was retained in the service. It has been stated by the workman in his affidavit that he had worked for more than 240 days , but the documents filed by the management proved that he hadworked much less than 240 days and had not completed 240 days in the preceding year from the date of his termination . The workman has also failed to prove that any junior to him was retained in the service . This fact came to the notice of the Tribunal that all the vacancies against 5361 भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Versus

1. The Chief Post Master General , PostOffice , Ambala Cantt.

2. The Superintendent , Railway Mail Service , HR Division, Ambala .

....Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the Workman

: Shri S.P. Chawla Advocate .

Shri G.C. Babbar advocate

Forthe .Management

AWARD

which theworkman was working on daily wages were filled inthrough the regular appointment as per rules . The name of the workman was not sponsored by the employment office, whereas , it was an essential condition for recruitment of any person against the permanent vacancy under the rules. Thus , the workman was disengaged on account of filling up all the vacancies against he was working as the dailywager as per the procedure prescribe in the rules . So , it cannot be treated as the retrenchment and there is no illegality in disengaging the workman . The reference is accordingly answered that his disengagement is not suffering from any illegality and he is not entitled for any relief. Let the Central Government be approached for publication of the award and thereafter file be consigned.

Passed on 11-8-09

G.K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 19 अगस्त, 2009

Government of India vide Notification No. L- 40012/147/99-1R (DU ) Dated 13-9-1999 and L-40012/ 149/ 99 - IR(DU) Dated 13-9-1999 by exercising its powers under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act ( hereinafter refered to as an Act) , referred the following two references for judicial adjudication to this Tribunal :-

का. आ. 2517. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार डाक विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 189 तथा 190/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

1. "Whether the action of the Chief Post Master General, Haryana Circle, Ambala Cantt . and Supdt . , Railway Mail Services , Haryana Division , Ambala Cantt in terminating the services of Sh . Pradeep Kumar is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ? " [ सं. एल-40012/147,149/99- आई आर ( डी यू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 19th August , 2009

2. "Whether the action of the Chief Post Master General,Haryana Circle , Ambala Cantt. and Supdt. , Railway Mail Services , Haryana Division , Ambala Cantt . in terminating the services of Sh . Mukesh Kumar is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ? " S. O. 2517. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.189 & 190/99) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum -Labour Court , No.1 Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Posts and their workman,which was received by the Central Government on 19-8-2009 .

[No. L-40012/ 147,149/ 99- IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH.

Case No. I.D. 189,190/99

Common questions of law and facts are involved in both of the references ; hence , the same are answered by this award. In ID No. 189 of 99 the workman submitted in his statement of claim that he worked as Mailman on daily wageswith the management from 21-10-1995 to 17-01-1998 and on 17-01-1998 his services were terminated without any notice , one month wages in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensation . His juniors were retained in service and fresh hands were provided with the job, whereas , his services were terminated. The workman has submitted in his statement of claim , his termination was void and illegal being against the provisions of Section 25 (H) and 25 (G) of the Act. Likewise in ID No. 190 of 1999 Shri Mukesh Kumar Versus Post Office , the workman in his statement of claim submitted that he worked with the management of Post Office as Mailman on daily wages from 9-8-1996 to 31-01-1998 and his services were terminated without any notice or retrenchment compensation on 31- 01 1998. Both of the workmen have requested for their reinstatement into the service with full back wages .

S/ Shri Pardeep Kumar & Mukesh Kumar C/ o Shri B. M. Sharma, H - 14 , Post and Telegraph Colony , Ambala Cantt- 133001

.....Applicant

The management of Post Office submitted in its written statement that none of the workman was appointed as per the procedure on regular basis . Work from the 31755709-25 5362

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

New Delhi , the 19th August , 2009 workman was taken in the exigencies as on required basis . The workmen have not worked 240 days in the preceding year on the date of his termination and , as such , none of the workman is entitled for their reinstatement into the services.

S. O. 2518. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 19/98 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court No.1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Punjab & Sindh Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 18-8-2009.

[No. L- 12012/ 141 /97 - IR ( B - II ) ]

RAJINDER KUMAR , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA. PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D. 19/98

Shri Pritam Singh , C/ o R. K. Parmar , Q. No. 35 -G , Nangal Township , Ropar, Punjab- 140001 .

Applicant

Versus

The Assist. General Manager , Punjab & Sindh Bank , G.T. Road, Jalandhar - 144005 .

Both of the parties were afforded the opportunity of adducing and filing evidence . The workmen filed their respective affidavits and were cross - examined by learned counsel for the management . Likewise Shri Siya Ram Sinkwal and Shri Gulab Singh were respectively cross- examined in both of the references as witnesses of the management . All the documents as prayed for by the workmen were filed by the management . Thedocuments filed by the management shows the working days of the workmen and the wages paidto them . The statement of working days filed by the workman itself shows that not only in the preceding year from the date of his termination but in any of the calendar year they have not worked for 240 days with the management . I have gone through all the documents filed by the management minutely and I am of the view that none of the workman has completed 240 days ofwork with the management , There is one more contention ofboth of the workmen that theirjuniors namely; Kaleshwar Parshad , Moti Ram , Gopal Dass and Krishan Kumar were retained in service , whereas , their services were terminated . on perusal of materials on record, 1 am of the view that these workers were appointed by the management of Post Office on regular basis as per the rules of the Department . There cannot be any parity of a daily waged worker with the regular appointed employees .

....Respondent

APPEARANCES

For the Workman

: Shri R. K. Singh Parmar

: Shri J. S. Sathi

For the Management

AWARD

Passed on 4-8-09

Thus , neither the workmen had completed 240 days with the management , nor any junior to them was retained in the services in same capacity. Accordingly, both the references are answered with the finding that there has been no illegality in terminating the services of the workmen . The workmen , accordingly , are not entitledto any relief. Let the Central Government be informed for publication of award , and thereafter , file be consigned to record room .

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 19 अगस्त, 2009

Government of India vide notification No. L - 12012/ 141 /97 /IR ( B - II ) Dated 13-01-98 , by exercising its powers under Section 10 of Industrial Dispute (hereinafter referred as an Act), referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication ..

" Whether the action of the management of Punjab & SindBank in terminating the services ofShri Pritam Singh w.e.f. 30-6-92 is legal andjustified ? If not , to what reliefthe said workman is entitled and from what date ? " का. आ. 2518. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब एण्ड सिंध बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 19/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल-12012/141/97- आई आर( बी -11 ) ]

After receiving the reference , parties were summoned. Parties appeared and filed their respective pleadings . Opportunity for adducing evidence was also afforded as per the provisions of the Act . Oral evidence was recorded and parties also preferred to file the documentary evidence . Opportunity for arguments was also given to the parties .

राजेन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

It is the contention of the workman that he worked withthemanagement as a temporary peon from 8-08-87 to 30-06-92 continuously with few breaks which have no meaning in the eyes of law . He has completed 240 days of work in the preceding year from the date of his termination. Hisservices were terminated on 30-06-92, without notice , one month wages in lieu of notice or retrenchment compensation. His termination is illegal and void being against the provisions of the Act. On the basis of above mentioned contentions , the workman has prayed for his re-instatement into the services with full back - wages along with consequential relief.

The management ofthe bank opposed the contention ofthe workman by filing the written statement . As per the facts mentioned in the written statement, the workman has not worked 240 days continuously in any of the academie year, he worked with the management. He was engaged by the bank intermittently as on daily-wage basis . It is also contended by the bank in its written statement that the memorandum of settlement dated 16-10-1992/13-08-1994 werearrived at between the management ofPunjab & Sind Bank and worker's union namely All India Punjab & Sind Bank Staff Organization . As per the settlement any workman who has completed 240 days in any of the academic years from 1-1-1982 was to be given one time opportunity to appear into a test, and State wise seniority for purpose of absorption of their services into bank . The workman was not within the criteria of this settlement and the benefit of the settlement was not given to him. It was further contended by the management of the bank that he was involved in a criminal case for burning his wife and as such has no right for absorption in the bank service.

The workman in his affidavit has given the details of working days. He has also filed certain letters in which he has been shown as temporary peon. Documents which shows his qualification for the post of peon in the bank have also been filed. The management has also filed the detail description of working days , period of work and payment of wages made to the workman. I have gone through the evidence oral and documentary adduced/filed by the parties. If the statement of working days given by the workman in his affidavit is deemed to be correct, it is clear that workman has not worked for 240 days in the preceding year from the date of his termination . From this statement, it is also clear that he has not completed 240 days in any of the academic year, he had worked with the management, that is the reason, the benefits of settlement was not extended to him because he had not fulfilled the criteria for conferring such benefits . There is no iota of evidence that any junior to him was engaged after his termination in one ofthe letter written by the Bank regarding workman, he has been shown as temporary peon, but it cannot be decisive in deciding the claim of the workman. It 3175 G1/09-26

5363 isadmitted by the workman that no appointment letter was issued to him. It is further admitted that his name was not sponsored by the Employment Exchange. Thus , there is a force in the contention of the management that services of the workman were taken purely as daily- wage worker . For theappointmentoftemporary peon, the detailed procedure has been given in the rules and he was not appointed in compliance of procedure mentioned in the rules for appointment of temporary peon.

The workman has also tried to prove that he is perfectlyeligible for the post of peon . This Tribunal cannot act as an appointing authority but its jurisdiction is confined to the reference referred by the Central Government. The reference referred by the Government is the legality of termination order.

As stated earlier , the workman had not worked with the management for 240 days not only in the preceding year from the date of his termination but in any of the academic year he had worked with the management. No junior was engaged after his termination, thus he is not entitled for the protection of the provisions of the Act .

Accordingly , the reference is adjudicated and answered that the termination ofthe workman is not illegal and the workman is not entitled for any relief. Let Central Government be approached for publication of award , and thereafter, file be consigned to record room.

G.K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 19 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2519,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , गुवाहटी के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 21/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -12011 /144/2003- आईआर ( बी -11 ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 19th August . 2009

S.O. 2519.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.21 /2004 ) of the Central Govemment Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court , Guwahati now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Union Bank of India and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 18-8-2009 .

[No. L- 12011 / 144/2003 - IR ( B - 11 )] RAJINDER KUMAR , Desk Officer 5364

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART 11-SFC.3 ( ii ) | ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL CUM -LABOUR COURT, GUWAHATI, ASSAM

Present:

Shri D. K. Deb Roy, M.A. ,LL.B.

PresidingOfficer,

CGIT-cum - Labour Court,

Guwahati .

Ref. Case No. 21 of2004

In the matter of an Industrial Dispute between:- TheManagement of Union Bank of India, Guwahati .

Vrs

Their Workman Sri Putul Ch . Barman

APPEARANCES

For the Workman

:Sri B.N. Sharma, Advocate

FortheManagement :Sri L. P. Sharma , Advocate

Smt. R. Bhattacharjee,

Advocate

Sri S. Chakrabarty, Advocate

Date ofAward: 12-8-2009

AWARD

1. The present reference is arising out of the GovernmentNotification vide Memo No.L- 12011/144/2003- IR (B- II ) Dated: 19-1-2004, to adjudicate the issue as described in the Schedule below.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Union Bank of India in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service vide Order dated 19-12-2000 on Shri P. C. Barman is legal and justified? If not, what relief is the concerned workman entitled to? "

2. The case of the workman is described in a nutshel .

Theworkman is a member of the Union , a registered Trade Union operating in the establishment of the Union Bank of India (herein called the Bank). The workman has alleged that he joined as subordinate staff in the Bank on 12-6-1982 and was promoted to the clerical cadre on 10-7-1995 . Thereafter he was appointed as Head Cashier on 1-6-1996 and posted in Ghaduligaon Branch . At the tiine ofdismissal he was posted at Kharupetia Branch. He wasplaced under suspension on 21-3-1998 . On 23-4-1998 he was served with a charge sheet leveling the following allegations .

(i) Doing acts prejudicial to the interest ofthe Bank .

(ii) Breach of any rules of business of the Bank .

allegation against the workman is that on 9-5-97 Saving Bank Account Holder No.805 presented a self-cheque bearing No. 147452 dated 7-5-97 for Rs . 31,275 . The said amount was not paid to the customer on the contrary the same was deposited in S.B. Account No. 1856 standing in the name of the workman . The workman had withdrawn Rs . 16,000 on 9-5-97 and the balance amounting to Rs . 15,275 was withdrawn on the next day, the further case of the workmam is that he purchased a withdrawal form from Barpeta Road Branch for an amount of Rs . 4,000. Accordingly a cheque for Rs . 4,000 was sent on 3-10-96. But the workman debited his account only on 1-3-97 . The workmanis alleged to have utilized Bank's money without paying any interest from 3-10-96 to 28-2-97 for the period of 5 months and the workman was asked to submit his explanation within 7 days . The workman submitted his explanation dated 26-6-98 wherein he denied to have committed any act prejudicial to the interest ofthe Bank. In his explanation he stated inter- alia that on the day of presentation of the said cheque the cash balance in the Bank was Rs . 791.77p . So he deposited the customer's cheque in his account . So far as the C.P. of Rs.4,000 is concerned the workman admitted the allegation and was agreed to pay the interest for 5 months . On 28th June, 1999 a supplementary charge-sheet was issued against the workman alleging that on 28-10-97 an amount of Rs.6,000 and on 13-11-97 an amount of Rs.4,000 were withdrawn by the workman from the S.B. Account of Halodhar Boro . That on 14-10-97 an amount of Rs.3,000 waswithdrawn by the workman from the S.B. Account of Hirdoy Das . subsequently he repaid the amountby Demand Draft. He further explained that at that time he was in urgent need of money as his children was seriously ill and he himselfwas a T. B. patient and these exceptional circumstances compelled him to withdraw Rs.13,000 to meet the exigencies . Thereafter a supplementary charge sheet was submitted against the workman . Pursuant to the charge sheet the workman vide his letter dated 6-1-99 admitted his guilt of withdrawing Rs . 13,000 . The workman was informed vide letter dated 10-12-99 that Mr. P.M. Rathod , Dy. Manager (P) , Regional Office at Bhubeneswar would hold an enquiry. Rathod issued notice dated 15-2-2000 to theworkman informing him that the enquiry will take place on13-3-2000 .According to him the letters dated 10-12-99 and 11-12-99 were not endorsed to him . However , the enquiry was not held on that day rather the enquiry was heldand concluded on 2-5-2000 . During enquiry one witness. on behalf ofthe Disciplinary Authority was examined . He also participated in the proceeding but examined none. According to him the enquiry was not fair giving a go-bye to the established Principle of Natural Justice . The DisciplinaryAuthority vide letter dated 2-12-2000 informed theworkman as to the proposed punishment along with a copy of enquiry report directing him to appear on 13-12-2000 for hearing as against the proposed penalty on dismissal and for minor misconduct, proposed penalty of The first charge was treated as gross misconduct and the second charge was minor misconduct . The 5365 भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/भाद्र 21, 1931

[ भाग 11 खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Ghaduligaon Branch . Barpeta Road Branch sent the choque under C.P. No.111 for collection to Ghaduligaon Branch on 3rd October , 1996. Although there were sufficient balance in S. B. Account No. 1856 on 18-10-96, 5-11-96 and 1-2-97 to honour the withdrawal form of Rs:4,000 but that was not done . Rather the workman had utilized Rs.4,000 from Brid October, 1996 to 28th February, 1997 without paying interest on the same . According to the Management the workman committed gorss and serious misconduct prejudicial to the interest of the Bank . Hence, the reference brought by the workman deserves to be dismissed in limini .

stoppage of increment for six months with cumulative effect. According to him the enquiry officer opined that the allegation ofdepositing Rs.31,275 in his personal account doesnot disclose malafide intention. So far as the allegation ofC.P. of Rs .4,000 remains as it is.Accordingto him there were some procedural irregularities . According to him the punishment imposed upon him was contrary to the law. Thereafter second show cause notice was issued to the workman and after due hearing the Disciplinary Authority confirmed the punishment vide letter dated 19-12-2000. Thereafter, the workman preferred an appeal which was also dismissed. Being highly aggrieved the Union raised anIndustrial Dispute which was culminated into a failure report.

4. In order to ensure fairness and transparencies , both the parties were allowed to adduce evidence andto submit documents in support of their respective cases? Accordingly plethora of documents have been proved and exhibited.

5.Decisions and reasons thereof :

Heard the learned counsel mappearing for the workman who in his efficacious submission has contended inter alia that there may be some irregularities here and there but it does not constitute the offence of misconduct, hence, the order ofdismissalex-faoic appears to be illegal and the workman should be resinstated along with backwages . The learned counsel for the Management has not personally argued the case but he has sübmitted his written argumont , wherein he stated that the workman miss-utilized his position in the bank and had fraudulently withdrawn Rs . 13,000 without any authentication from the customer's account . He has further submitted that the workman admitted his guilt and the order of dismissal passed by the Management was right and justified and that shouldbe affirmed.

The workman examined himself as witness and his counterpart the Management has examined two witnesses.

3. The Union Bank of India (herein after called the Management) contested the proceeding by filing WrittenStatement refuting the claim of the workman. Accordingto the management the Union as shown by the workman is not a Registered Trade Union under the provision ofTrade Union Act, 1926. It is further alleged thatthe requirement ofSection 22 ofthe Trade Union Act, 1926 has not been complied with by the workman. It is further alleged that Jagannath Chakrabarty , the Secretary of the Union has no locus - standi to initiate the proceeding. It is also alleged that there is nothing in the record to show that Mr. Chakrabarty was entrusted by a resolution to proceed with the proceeding. There is absolutely no materials to show that the workman Mr. P.C.Barman was the member ofthe Union . The further case ofthe Management is that the workman participated inthe departmental proceeding and there is no whisper as to the perversity of finding. The main grievance of the Management is that while the workman was working as Head Cashier " C" at Ghaduligaon Branch he committed some misconduct which was reported to the Bank. Accordingly he was placed under suspension in terms of memorandum No. CO : IRD: 2286: 98 dated 21-3-1998 . Thereafter charge-sheet hearing No. CO: IRD:AS :MISC :2031 : 5127 :98 dated 28-6-1998 was issued to the workman calling upon him to show cause as to why disciplinary action should not be taken against him . The first allegation levelled against the workman is that on 9-5-97 the S.B. Account HolderNo. 805 presented a self-cheque bearing No. 147452 dated 7th May, 1997 for Rs . 31,275 at the Branch against which Token No. 14was issued to the bearer of the cheque .But instead of making payment to the bearer of the cheque the workman deposited the same in his personal S. B. Account No. 1856 and had withdrawn Rs . 16,000 on that dayitselfbywithdrawal form and had withdrawn remaining amount of Rs . 15,275 on subsequent day. The further allegation of the Management is that the workman had purchased withdrawal form at Rs.4,000 at Barpeta Road Branch drawn in the S. B. Account No. 1856 at

6. Now let us consider the evidence en record . The workman in his evidence has said that during the suspension priod he worked for sometime in the bank as Clerk in Kharupetia Branch . His attendance Register was also verified by the authority. The Manager ofKharupetia Branch verbally'requested him to work in the Bank with an assurance that he will be reinstated. He has further said during the period of suspension he was drawing full salary. Ext. Aseries (certified copies) containing 50 sheets showing his hand writing . In cross -examination the workman has admitted that Ext. 1 is the suspension order. He has also admitted that during the suspension period he drew his subsistence allowances as per law he has also stated that after completion of one year, full salary was paid to him as subsistence allowance . Exts . 2 and 10 are the charge-sheets issued against him . In cross-examination this 5366

[ PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] .

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/BHADRA 21 , 1931

witness has also stated that no written order was issued by the Branch Manager for allowing him to work at Kharupetia Branch during his suspension period. He has also stated that Central Office, Bombay is the appointing authority. He has also admitted that Branch Manager is not his appointing authority. Neither the Central Office nor the Regional office authorized him to work in the KharupetiaBranch during his suspension period . Exts.4, 5, 6, 7 were written by him. Ext.9 in his reply whereupon Ext.9( 1 ) is his signature. Ext. 10 is the supplementary charge- sheet received by him . Ext.11 is the reply submitted by him . Ext . 11 ( 1 ) is his signature. Ext. 12 is the notice , issued to him by the Enquiry Officer . Ext . 13 is the enquiry proceeding containing 12 pages . Ext . 13 ( 1 ) to 13 ( 12) are his signatures. He received enquiry report, Ext . 14 in 9 sheets . He also received the second show cause notice vide Ext . 15. Ext. 16 is his reply, wherein he admitted his guilt. Thereafter he was asked for personal hearing vide Ext . 17. Ext. 18 is the dismissal order. During the enquiry proceeding his authorized representative cross -examined the witness for the Management. Exts . 13 ( 14) to 13 ( 23 ) are the signatures of his defence representative.

witness the workman Barman admitted his guilt in respect of charge No.2 as mentioned above in his reply dated 26-6-98 vide Ext.9 . According to him temporary misappropriation was committed by the workman to a tune of Rs.4,000 . This witness has made a categorical statement that the workman misappropriated another sum of Rs.13,000 . According to him the concerned workman had a withdrawn a sum of Rs.6,000 from the account of Shri Haladhar Boro , vide S.B A/C No. 1613 on 20-10-1997 andanother sum ofRs.4,000 on 13-11-1997. The handwriting ofthe folio with the ledger is of the workman Sri Putul Chandra Barman . As a matter of fact , the workman Barman had fraudulently withdrawn Rs.10,000 in two occasions from the account of Haladhar Boro . He had also withdrawn Rs.3,000 from the S.B. Account No.83 standing in the name of Sri Hridoy Das on 14-10-1997 . The withdrawal form was not signd by the account holder Hridoy Das . The bank accounts were forged by the workman . The workman vide his letter ( Ext.11 ) had confessed his guilt that he had withdrawn altogether Rs. 13,000 from the account of Haladhar Boro and Hridoy Das . Ext . 14 is the enquiry report . Thereafter all the formalities were complied with by the Management . Ext. 16 is the reply ofthe show cause notice. Ext. 17 is the findings ofthe personal hearing . Ext . 18 is the dismissal order.

In his cross-examination this witness has said that he does not know name of the disciplinary authority as reflected in Exts. 2 and 10. It was suggested by the workman that he has deposed falsely for the sake of the Management though he denied .

8. MW.2 in the same tune has supported the case of the Management . This witness has proved some documents viz. Ext. 1 , the suspension order dated 21-3-98; Ext.2is the charge sheet dated 23-4-1998 ; Ext.3 is the self cheque dated 7-5-1997 ; Ext.4 is the pay - in-slip dated 8-5-1997; Ext.5 is the withdrawal form dated 8-5-1997 ofRs . 16,000; and the Ext.6 is the withdrawal form dated 9-5-1997 for Rs.15,275 ; Ext.7 is the withdrawal form dated 3-10-1996 bearing No. C. P. III . Ext.8 is the collection schedule dated4-10-1996; Ext.9 is the reply of the workman admitting his guilt. Ext . 10 is the supplementary charge sheet dated 28-6-1999.Ext.11 is the confessional statement dt.6-1-1999 . Ext . 12 is the notice of the enquiry. Ext. 13 is the enquiry proceedings . Ext. 14 is the report of the enquiry officer . Ext.15 is the forwarding letter addressed to the workman. Ext . 17 is the findings of the personal hearing and Ext. 18 isthe dismissal order . This witness has been cross- examined by the workman .

In cross examination , this witness has stated that he does not know whether the amount of Rs.13,000 was refunded by the workman . During cross -examination , no fruitful material could be brought from the month of this witness.

7. T Management witness No.1 has said the workman was charge sheeted dated 23-4-1998 asking him to show cause as to why disciplinary action should not be taken against him alleging that the account holder of S. B. A/C No.805 presented a self cheque No.147452dated 7th May, 1997 for a sum ofRs.31,275 at Gadhuligaon Branch against token number 14 which was a bearer cheque . The said cheque purported to have been paid in cash by the workman but actually the cheque was not paid to the account holder rather the entire amount was deposited inthe own account of the workman in his account No. 1856 . He has further stated that the workman purchased a withdrawal Form on 3-10-1996 for sum of Rs.4,000 at Barpeta Road Branch drawn at SB Account No.1856 at Gadhuligaon Branch which is the account number of the workman Putul Chandra Barman . The Barpeta Road Branch thereafter , sent the cheque ( withdrawal form) under cheque purchase (CP ) No.111 for collection to Gadhuligaon Branch on 3-10-1996 . But Sri Barman did not honour the withdrawal form till 1st April, 1997 and thus he utilized the said amount from 3rd October 1996 to 28th February, 1997 without paying any interest to the bank violating the norms and procedure of the Bank, though the workman had sufficient balance at that time in his account . Ext.2 isthe show cause notice dated 23-4-1998 . Ext.3 is the self cheque dated 7-5-1997 issued by Block Development Officer, Jalah Development Block. Ext.4 is the pay- in -slip . Ext.5 is the withdrawal form dated 8-5-1997 for Rs . 16,000. Ext.6 is the withdrawal form dated 9-5-1997 for Rs . 15,275 . Exts.4, 5, 6 are the handwriting of the workman . Ext.7 is thewithdrawal form (cheque purchase) bearing No.III dated 3-10-1996 . Ext . 8 is the collection schedule dated 4-10-1996 issued by the Barpeta Road Branch . According to this 5367 भारत का राजपत्र: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

TheAwardbe sent to the Ministry as per law.

Given under my hand and seal of this Tribunal on this12th day of August, 2009 at Guwahati . D. K. DEB ROY, Presiding Officer 9. I have considered the evidence adduced by the workman vis- a - vis the evidence of the two witnesses of theManagement. The workman has admitted his guilt vide Exts.9 and 11. Exts.9 and 11 have not been denied by the workman . Now crux of the question as to whether the workman was rightly dismissed from service .

नई दिल्ली, 19 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2520.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद मे केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं 1. चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 76/2004) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -12012/3/2005- आईआर( बी- II ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 19th August, 2009

10. The simple case ofthe Management is that being a Bank employee he misappropriated some amounts of other customers without any authentication which is a serious misconduct and it is unbecoming on the part of the Bank Employee . The workman tried to show that he was in need of money and accordingly he had withdrawn themoney from the account ofsome customers . According to me the explanation as shown by the workman does not deserve any sympathy and accordingly he was dismissed from service bythe Management. In my considered opinion , I hold that the action of the Management can not be saidto be illegal. In this context, let me refer the following decisions ofthe Hon'bleApex Court:

1. ( 1998 ) 4 SCC 310, wherein the Apex Court has held " It need to be emphasized that in the banking business, absolute devotion, diligence, integrity and honesty needs to be preserved by the Bank employees . If it is not observed, the confidence of thepublic/depositors would be impaired.

S.O. 2520.-In Pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 76/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, No.1 , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexture in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation tothe management of Syndicate Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 18-8-2009.

2. UCo Bank ... Vrs ... Hardev Singh , in which the dismissal of a Clerk for misappropriation ofRs.864 was upheld by the Supreme Court .

[No. L- 12012/3/2005 - IR( B- 11) ] RAJINDER KUMAR , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

3. In Municipal Committee, Bahadurghar ...Vrs... Krishna Behani and ors . , reported in 1996 (2) PJLR, SC-9, wherein it has been held though the money misappropriated may be small, yet it is a serious crime forwhich no sympathy can be shown and it warrants punishment of dismissal .

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT-I , CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D. 76/2004

4. (2000 ) 7 SCC 517 , wherein it has been observed thatmisconduct on the part of the Bank Employee deserves dismissal from service .

Shri Mangat Ram S /o Shri Joginder Dass , R/ o 12 , House Line , Near Sunder Building , Krishna Nagar , Shimla (Himachal Pradesh)

.....Applicant

Versus

TheBranchManager , Syndicate Bank , The Mall , Shimla, (Himachal Pradesh)

..... Respondent 11. Having heard both sides and having considered the entirety ofthe facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the ratio as laid down by the Apex Court in a catena of decisions as referred to above , I am constrained to hold that the punishment imposed upon the workman does not appear to be unreasonable , harsh rather it appears to be commensurate with the charges brought against the workman , thus warrants no interference by this Court.

APPEARANCES

For theWorkman

12. In the result , the punishment imposed upon the workman stands affirmed. With the observation indicated above , the Issue is thus answered accordingly.

For the Management

317591/ 99-27 5368

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009/ BHADRA 21 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) | AWARD

ANNEXURE

Passed on 31-7-2009

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/32/2003

The Central Government vide notification No. L - 12012/ 3 / 2005 - IR ( B - II ) dated 3-3-2005 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :

Presiding Officer : Shri Mohd. Shakir Hasan

Shri H. L. Vishwakarma ,

General Secretary, GCF Workers ' Union, 1/8 , T.I.T. Building , East Dhamapur,

Workman/Union

Jabalpur

"Whether the action of the management of Syndicate Bank, Branch Office, Shimla in terminating the services of Shri Mangat Ram w.e.f. 27-7-2004 is illegal and unjustified? If so to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date?"

Versus

TheGeneral Manager ,

TheGeneral Manager,

GunCarriage Factory,

Ordnance Factory, Khamaria , Jabalpur Jabalpur

Management

AWARD

Passed on this 6th day of August , 2009 2. Case taken up in Lok Adalat today. The parties settled the dispute after long discussion . The parties agreed in terms of the letter reference No. 5762/ RC /PD/ IRD/2009 dated 21-7-09 addressed to the Presiding Officer of this Tribunal . The bank has agreed to provide him the job either in Solan Branch or in Palampur Branch . The workman has agreed for his absorption in to the service of the bank in Solan Branch . The workman has forgone all the back wages and other consequential benefits . In view of the settlement, the reference is disposed of as settled. Central Government be informed. File be consigned.

1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No.L - 14011 / 13/2001 ( IR ) ( DU), dated. 28-1-2003/3-2-2003 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal :-

Chandigarh 31-7-2009

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 21 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2521.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ऑर्डनेन्स फैक्ट्री के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/एलसी/आर/ 32/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -14011 / 13 /2001-आईआर (डीयू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 21st August, 2009

" Whether Shri Doodhnath Singh is a protected workman in terms of Section 33 (3 ) of the 1.D. Act and whether the action of the management of Gun Carriage Factory , Khamaria , Jabalpur in reducing thepenalty ofdismissal/ termination from service to that of compulsory retirement and again to the penalty of reduction to the lower post of labourer (unskilled) during the pendency of adjudication proceeding before CGIT, Jabalpur ( Reference Order No. L - 14012/ 17 /92 dated 27-9-93 of the Ministry of Labour) is legal and justified ; and whether the demands of the union for payment of the wages to the concerned workman for the period from 14-3-92 to 10-8-92 for giving benefit of ACP and promotion to the post of semi - skilled grade are just and proper?"

2. The workman did not appear inspite of proper notice. Lastly the predecessor in office proceeded ex parte against theworkman on 18-2-2008 .

S.O. 2521. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.CGIT/ LC/R/32/2003 ) of the Central Govemment Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Ordnance Factory and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 21-8-2009 .

3. The management appeared and filed his written statement . The case of the management in short is that Shri Doodhnath Singh was a Central Government employee and was governed under CCS (CCA) Rules , 1965 . He was holding a post of office bearer of the Union and was misusing his privilege of a Union leader. He has a [No. L- 14011/13/2001 - IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : सितम्बर 12, 2009/ भाद्र 21 , 1931

habitual offender by his indisciplined behaviour . He was given warning and censured on number of occasions . He was once dismissed and again reinstated and thereafter hewas compulsory retired from service . He filed review to the President of India and the Hon'ble President in exercise of power conferred on him modified the punishment to that of reduction to the lower post of Labourer (unskilled ) vide order No. 22 (3 )/ 11 /96/ D / ( Fr- II) dated 10-8-98 . He retired from service w.e.f. 30-6-03 before completing 24 years qualifying service . As such he was not entitled to any further relief. It is submitted that the refernce be answered in favour of the management .

4. To prove the case , the management has adduced oral as well as documentary evidence . The management witness Surjit Das is examined in the case . He is Joint General Manager in Ordnance Factory , Khamaria , Jabalpur.He has supported the fact that the workman was habitual offender by his indisciplined behaviour. He has several times punished and lastly he was compulsory retired from the service . He has stated that he preferred review petition before the Hon'ble President of India where his punishment was reduced to the Lower post of Labour (unskilled) . He has proved the documents which are marked as Exhibits M/ 1 to M/ 7 . He has supported this fact that the disciplinary action was conducted according to rules and he had been given full opportunity to defend himself and the principles of natural Justice was followed. His evidence is ex parte as such there is no other evidence to contradict his evidence . There is no reason to disbelieve his evidence . Accordingly , the reference is answered in favour of the management and against the workman.

5. In the result, award is passed ex parte against the workman and in favour of the management without any order to costs .

6. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment as per rules.

MOHD . SHAKIR HASAN , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 27अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2522.- औद्योगिक विवादं अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 97/03 , 103/03 , 101/03 , 99/3 , 21/05 , 30/2000 , 31/2000 , 26/05 , 46/04 , 568/05 , 567/05 , 98/03 ,

5369 566/05 , 11/07 , 14/07 , 1/03 , 29/01 , 27/05 एवं 28/05 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 18-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[एल-30012/27 , 28 , 24 , 19 , 46 , 10 , 26 , 25 , 23 , 20 ,

2, 9 एवं 8/2002- आई. आर. ( एम ) ;

एल-30012/74 एवं 73/ 1999 - आई. आर. ( एम) ;

एल-30012/21/2004- आई. आर. (एम);

एल-30012/40 एवं 39/2006- आई. आर. (एम ) ;

एल-30012/ 103/2000- आई. आर. ( एम ) ]

कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 27th August, 2009

S.O. 2522.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 97/03 , 103/03, 101/03 , 99/03 , 21/05 , 30/2000, 31/2000, 26/05 , 46/04, 568/05, 567/05 , 98/03 , 566/05, 11/07, 14/07, 1/03, 29/01 , 27/05 and 28/05 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, No.1 , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 18-8-2009 .

[Nos . L-30012/27 , 28 , 24 , 19, 46 , 10, 26, 25, 23, 20, 2,9 &

8/2002- IR(M) ] ;

L-30012/74 and 73 / 1999 - IR ( M);

L-30012/21 /2004- IR (M);

L-30012/40 and 39/2006-1R ( M);

L-30012/103/2000-1R (M) ]

KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT - I , CHANDIGARH

Case I.D. No. 97/2003 and 22 others ( as mentioned in the listbelow)

Shri Anil Kumar & 22 Others ( as mentioned in the list below)

.....Applicants

Versus

TheExecutiveDirector , Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Panipat Refinery, Panipat- 132140

.....Respondent APPEARANCES

For the Workmen : Shri Karan Singh , A.R. For theManagement : Shri Vivek Kaushal , Advocate AWARD

passed on 11-8-2009

This award shall . dispose of 23 references of different workmen referred by the Central Government by different Notifications . The references which are being disposed of by this award are as follows:-

5370

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12 , 2009 /BHADRA 21 , 1931

No. I.D.No.

Reference No.

97/03

L-30012/27/2002 IR( M) Dated 2-4-2003

103/03

L-30012/28/2002 IR( M) Dated 2-4-2003

101/02

L- 30012/24/2002 IR (M) Dated 2-4-2003

99/03

L-30012/ 19/2002 IR(M) Dated 2-4-2003

21/05

L-30012/46/2002 IR (M) Dated4-5-2005

27/01

L- 30012/ 105/2002 IR (M) Dated 8-1-2001

28/01

L-30012/104/2002 IR (M) Dated 24-1-2001

87/01

[PART 11-SEC . 3( ii )] PartiesName

Anil Kumar Vs. 1.O.C.L.

Tejbir Vs. I.O.C.L.

Rajbir Vs. I.O.C.L.

Dilbag Vs. I.O.C.L.

Rajesh Kumar Vs. 1.O.C.L.

Naresh Vs. 1.O.C.L.

Raj Pal Vs. I.O.C.L.

Rohtas Vs. 1.0.C.L.

L-30012/ 131 / 1997 IR( C- 1 ) Dated4-3-1999

30/2000

L-30012/ 74/ 1999 IR(M) Dated 24-1-2000

10.

31/2000

L- 30012/73/ 1999 IR (M) Dated24-1-2000

26/05

11 .

L-30012/ 10/2002 IR M) Dated 8-6-2005

12. 46/04

L-30012/21 /2004 IR (M) Dated 2-11-2004

13.

568/05

L-30012/26/2002 IR ( M) Dated 4-11-2003

14. 567/05

L-30012/25/2002 IR (M) Dated 2-4-2003

15. 98/03

L-30012/23/2002 1R (M ) Dated 2-4-2003

16. 566/05

L- 30012/20/2002 IR (M) Dated 2-4-2003

17. 11/07

L-30012/40/2006 IR (M) Dated 15-1-2007

14/07

18.

L-30012/39/2006 IR (M) Dated 15-1-2007

19. 1/03

L- 30012/2/2002 IR (M) Dated 10-12-2002

20. 29/01

L-30012/ 103/2000 IR(M ) Dated24-1-2001

21. 27/05

L-30012/9/2002 IR ( M) Dated 8-6-2005

28/05

22.

L-30012/8/2002 IR ( M) Dated 8-6-2005

23.

69/99

Vishnu Dutt Vs. 1.O.C.L.

Sitender Vs. 1.O.C.L

Karamvir Vs. 1.O.C.L.

Randhir Singh Vs. 1.O.C.L.

Subhash Vs. I.O.C.L.

Sat Pal Vs. I.O.C.L.

Krishan Vs. 1.O.C.L.

Suresh Kumar Vs. I.O.C.L.

Sat Pal Vs. I.O.C.L.

Surinder Singh Vs. 1.O.C.L.

Jaibir Vs. I.O.C.L.

Inder Vs. 1.O.C.L.

Ishwar Singh Vs. 1.O.C.L.

Jasbir Singh Vs. I.O.C.L.

L- 30012/ 132/ 1997 IR(C- 1 ) Dated 23-2-1999

Common questions of law and facts are involved in these references; hence , all the references are hereby disposed ofby this award . No doubt the nature of work of few set of workman was different . Few workmen alleged that they worked as Sweepers , whereas , the others contended that they worked as Mechanic or other some types of similar work . But as stated earlier, the common question for adjudication is same and that is whether there existed any employer - employee relationship between the management of Indian Oil Corporation and the workmen ? The relative issue is to what relief the workmen are entitled?

Onperusal of the pleadings of the parties , it is evidently clear that workmen have challenged their termination order being violative of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act . It was contended by the workmen that they were engaged by the management of Indian Oil Corporation directly. They were under the Joginder Singh Vs. I.O.C.L.

administrative control of the management of the Indian Oil Corporation and they were paid wages by the Indian Oil Corporation . On the other hand, the management Indian Oil Corporation has alleged that all the workmen were engaged on contract and they were the employees of the contractor and not of the Indian Oil Corporation .

Opportunity for adducing evidence was given to the workmen and the management . Evidence was accordingly, recorded. Documentary evidence was also filed in some cases by the workmen and almost in all the casesby the management as well . No doubt, the contention in some of the references is different ; accordingly, the same shall be dealt with in this award separately. At the cost ofrepetition , the main issue is the same , i.e. employer- employee relationship .

The evidence of the workman was recorded and indifferent sets of references , different officer of 5371 भारत का सजपत: सितम्बर 12 , 2009/ 楼 21,1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii )]

OilCorporation. Hon'ble Supreme Court in 2008 LLR-801 , GM ONGC Silchur Vs ONGC Contractual Workers Union had laid down the criteria to establish the direct employee- employer relationship between the workmen and the management of any organization . If we apply the ratio of GM ONGC Silchur's case (Supra), the workmen have to prove the following facts to establish the employee- employer relationship:--

1. That there exited a relationship of master and servant.

management was examined. I have gone through the pleadings and evidence of the parties in all the references . It is evidently clear that the matter involved in all the references is almost similar and the grievances can be redressed by a single award . No doubt, in few references there are some additional pleas taken by the workmen. The pleas so taken shall be discussed and dealt with separately in this very award. Thus, for the purpose of adjudication of all the references , considering similar nature of reference , I am consolidating the files and answering all the references by this award.

2. That there was no contractor appointed by the management of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

3.The management of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. , used to supervise the alleged work assigned to individualworkers .

4. That the management of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. took disciplinary action and called for explanations from the workers.

5. That the workers were paid wages by the management of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., directly and not through the contractor.

I have heard the parties at length . The main arguments of the workmen and their learned legal representative/counsel are that all the workmen were engaged/appointed by the management of Indian Oil Corporation directly and if their appointments have been shown through contractor by the management, it is illegal being against the provisions of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970. It was further argued that all the workmen were directly under the administrative control of the management and they were paid wages by the management of Indian Oil Corporation and in fact, they were the employees of Indian Oil Corporation and not of the contractor .

6. At the cost of repetition, the wages were paid directlytotheworkers by the management of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. , and the acquaintance roll were prepared by the management of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. , to make the payment to the workers.

Ifthe abovementioned ratio ofGM ONGC, Silchur's case(supra) is applied in all the references, it is clear that workmen have failed to prove that they were appointed/ engaged by the management of Indian Oil Corporation. There is no iota of evidence on record to prove that they were directly under the administrative control of the management of Indian Oil Corporation. No doubt, it is contendedby the workmen that their attendance were markedby the officers/officials ofmanagement of Indian OilCorporation, but it will not be sufficient to prove the administrative control over them.

On the other hand , learned counsel for the management of Indian Oil Corporation submitted that there existed no relationship of employer- employee between the management of Indian Oil Corporation and the workmen. The services ofthe workmen were provided by the different contractors . The consolidated contracted amount was paid to the contractor by the management of Indian Oil Corporation , and thereafter , the wages of the workmen were paid by the contractor and notby the management of Indian Oil Corporation . It was further argued by the learned counsel of the management that there has been no violation of any provisions of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970. If there is a violation of any provisions of the said Act, the workmen were not to be treated as direct employee of the Indian Oil Corporation but it will resulted into criminal action against the concerned authorities under the penal provisions of the said Act.

The issue ofemployer - employee relationship between the management of Indian Oil Corporation and the workman is a mixed question of facts and law, and accordingly, shall be adjudicated on the basis of evidence and pleadings of the parties .

In 1.D. Nos . 1/2003 , 97/2003, 98/2003, 99/2003, 101/2003, 103/2003, 566/2005, 567/2005 and 568 of2005 the workmenwho alleged to work as the sweepers in the office of management of Indian Oil Corporation, contended thatthere is a difference in the nature of documents filed by them and provided by the management of Indian Oil Corporation . When I perused the documents in detail during the course of arguments , it came to my notice that at the top of the attendance sheet there is a sign of a small piece of paper and after getting the zeroex something was written on zeroex paper and it was further zeroxed and filed by the workmen in these references, This eventwas accepted by the learned counsel for the workmen that it seems to be zeroxed by putting some small piece of In all the references , it is admitted fact that no appointment letter was issued by the management. It is denied by the workmen that the payment of wages were made good by the contractors but on perusal of the documents filed by the management , it is evidently clear that the payment to the workmen were made good by the respective contractors and not by the management of Indian 5372

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 12,2009/BHADRA 21,1931

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) ] paper at the space where the name of principal employer was written . Thus , under such circumstances this piece of paper (attendance sheet) cannot be considered in creating the master - servant relationship between the workmen and the management of Indian Oil Corporation .

All theworkmen were supposed to file/ adduce some cogent evidence like sanction of leave application , disciplinary action taken by the management of Indian Oil Corporation , if any , etc. Few instances have been shown by the workman in their cross -examination . When they were examined by the Tribunal, they stated that they used to apply leave to the officer of Indian Oil Corporation. But there is no piece of document provided to this Tribunal to prove that leave were ever sanctioned to any workmen by the management of Indian Oil Corporation. Thus, the instances enumeratedby the workmen in the references are not sufficient to constitute the administrative control bythe management of Indian Oil Corporation over all the workmen . Accordingly, the workmen have failed to prove that they were under the administrative control of the management of Indian Oil Corporation .

between the management of Indian Oil Corporation and the workmen . In few of the references , it is contended by the workmen that the contractor , if any, shown by the management of Indian Oil Corporation was camouflage and shame . In ONGC Silchur's case ( supra) , the conditions under which a contractor can be treated as camouflage and shame are mentioned . Hon'ble Supreme Court in this case has relied upon the law laid down in Steel Authority of India Ltd. and others Vs. National Union Water workers and Others AIR 2001 SC -3527 . The question before this Tribunal is under what circumstances the contract between management of Indian Oil Corporation and the workmen can be held to be shame and comouflage ? In case the contract has been held to be shame and camouflage, the contract labour working under the management of pricnipal employer are held to be the employees of the Indian Oil Corporation . It depends on the facts and circumstances of each case, whether the contract executed inbetween management and the contractor is camouflage and shame? It is also an issue of facts and has to be decided on the facts and circumstances of the case . Whether there is a genuine contractor , and whether there is a proper master - servant relationship in between the management of the IndianOil Corporation and the workmen also depends on the facts and circumstances of each reference . The Court/Tribunal has to apprise whether these facts emerged inrealty or there was some paper arrangement to make the payment good to the workmen through contractor.

Onthe payment of wages , the management of Indian Oil Corporation has filed the documentary evidence, which proves that consolidated amount on the basis of number of days worked by the workmen were given to the contractor and the contractor on the other hand used to paywages to the workmen . The management has filed all the relevant documents , such as , attendance sheet signed bythe officers of Indian Oil Corporation , order of payment passed on attendence of the workmen to the contractor, and thereafter, the payment of wages by the contractor to the workmen . Moreover , the management has also filed the detailed description of pay rolls containing all the details of payment of wages made good to its workmen, employees and officers . The name ofworkmen did not find place in these pay rolls .

The management of Indian Oil Corporation has also apprised this Tribunal that there is the procedure for recruitment ofworkmen for a particular work. No workman was recruited/appointed as per the rules of the department. Their services were provided by a contractor on outsourcing.

Onperusal ofallthe evidence , oral and documentary, given by the workmen/officer of the management of the Indian Oil Corporation , 1 am of the view that payment of wages to all the workmen were made good by the contractor and not by the management of Indian Oil Corporation .

Infew ofthe references , the nature of contractor is challenged by the workmen . No , doubt, almost in all , the references it is not mentioned in the pleadings that there wasa contractbetween the contractor and the management of Indian Oil Corporation: But the documents provided and filed by the management of Indian Oil Corporation proved that the workmen were having the notice and knowledge that their services are being taken through a contractor . Onthe basis of the documents , I am ofthe view that prior to raising the Industrial dispute ; the workmen were having the knowledge and notice that their services were provided tothe management of Indian Oil Corporation through contractor , but there is no mention of this fact in pleadings almost in all the references barring few. It is contended by the workmen that the contract is shame and camouflage and viod being against the provisions of Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act , 1970 . Unless and until the terms and conditions as laid down in GM ONGC'scase (supra) are not fulfilled , no workmen can be treated as the direct employee of Indian Oil Corporation.

The above discussion proves that neither the workmen were appointed/engaged by the management of the Indian Oil Corporation nor they were under the administrative control ofthe Indian Oil Corporation . They were also not paid the wages by Indian Oil Corporation . Hence , there existed no master- servant relationship

The next issue for the disposal before this Tribunal iswhether the workmen will be deemed to be in the services ofthe management of Indian Oil Corporation on account of violation of any of the provisions of Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) , Act 1970. It is issue of law and has limited concern with the facts . On the issue of facts , I [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

have already given my view that the workmen are not employees of the management of Indian Oil Corporation buttheir services were provided by the different contractors to the management . As this issue of law is also raised by the parties, it is the duly of this Tribunal todecide itaswell . On this issue , I am of the view that there may be three circumstances:-

There may be a case where the practice of contract labour is prohibited by the appropriate Government under Section 10 ( 1 ) of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition ) Act, 1970 .

2. There may be an issue regarding the registration ofestablishment of principal employer under Section 7 ofthe Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition ) Act, 1970.

3. Theremay be an issue regarding the licensebythe contractor under Section 12 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970.

The issue to be decided is whether in the case of violation of any of the provisions mentioned under Section 10( 1 ) , Section 7 and Section 12 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act 1970 , the contract labour shall be deemed to be an employee of the Principal employer?

This issue has been settled by Hon'ble the Apex Court in Steel Authority of India Ltd.'s case ( supra) . Moreover , Punjab and Haryana High Court in Food Corporation of India and others Vs. Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court- I , Chandigarh and others 2008 LLR 391 , has decided this issue after relying the ratio of Steel Authority of

5373

भारत का राजपत्र सितम्बर 12 , 2009/भाद्र 21 , 1931

india Ltd. , case ( supra) . Without mentioning the relevant paras of Steel Authority of India Ltd.s case (supra) and ofFood Corporation of India and others Vs. Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court - 1's case (supra) , I am relying the ratio of both of the judgments , and the ratio of both of the judgement is that if there is any violation of Section 7 , Section 10 and Section 12 of The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, then only penal provisions ofSection 23 and Section 25 of the said Act are attracted . Hence , it is nowhere provided that such employees , employed through the contractor would become employees of the principal employer . I have gone through the facts and circumstances of the case . Almost in all the references the registration and the license have been produced by the management of Indian Oil Corporation . It may only resulted in penal actions under Section 23 and Section 25 ofthe Contract Labour ( Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 , if there is any violation of any provisions of the Contract Labour ( Regulation and Abolition) Act .

Accordingly, 1 am of the view that none of the workmen was the employee of the management . There was no relationship of master - servant and employer and employee between the workmen and the management of Indian Oil Corporation. Thus , no question for termination ofthe services of the workmen by Indian Oil Corporation arises . All the references are answered accordingly and the workmen are not entitled for any relief. Let the *Central Government be informed, and thereafter , file be consigned to record room.

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer

Printed by the Manager, Govt. of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi - 110054.