This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

REGD . NO. D. L. (N ) 04/0007/2003-05 रजिस्ट्री सं ० डी० एल० ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 40]

No. 401

नई दिल्ली , सितम्बर 27 अक्तूबर 3 , 2009 , शनिवार/आश्विन 5-आश्विन 11 , 1931 NEW DELHI , SEPTEMBER 27 OCTOBER 3, 2009 , SATURDAY/ASVINA 5- ASVINA 11 , 1931 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II- खण्ड 3-उप- खण्ड ( ii) PART II-Section 3- Sub- section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

कार्मिक , लोक शिकायत और पेंशन मंत्रालय

(पेंशन और पेंशनभोगी कल्याण विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 22 सितम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 2689.- राष्ट्रपति संविधान के अनुच्छेद 148 के खंड ( 5 ) और अनुच्छेद 309 के परंतुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते. हुए, और भारतीय लेखा परीक्षा और लेखा विभाग में सेवारत व्यक्तियों के संबंध में भारत के नियंत्रक- महालेखा परीक्षक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् साधारण भविष्य निधि ( केन्द्रीय सेवा ) नियम , 1960 का और संशोधन करने के लिए निम्नलिखित नियम बनाती है , अर्थात्: - 1. ( 1 ) इन नियमों का संक्षिप्त नाम साधारण भविष्य निधि ( केन्द्रीय सेवा ) ( दूसरा संशोधन ) नियम , 2009 है ।

(2) ये राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख को प्रवृत्त होंगे ।

2. साधारण भविष्य निधि ( केन्द्रीय सेवा ) नियम , 1960 के नियम 12 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( च ) के पश्चात् निम्नलिखित खंड अंतस्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:

" ( छ ) ऐसे स्थानों के दर्शनार्थ , जो मंजूरी प्राधिकारी का यह समाधान होने पर कि वे स्थान तीर्थयात्रा के स्थान या किसी धार्मिक प्रतिष्ठा के स्थान समझे जाते हैं , होने वाले व्यय को पूरा करने के लिए" ।

[फा. सं.- 13/1/2006/पी एंड पी डब्ल्यू ( एफ ) ]

राज सिंह, निदेशक पाद टिप्पण: साधारण भविष्य निधि ( केन्द्रीय सेवा ) नियम , 1960 भारत के राजपत्र में अधिसूचना सं. का. आ. 3000 , तारीख । दिसंबर , 1960 द्वारा प्रकाशित किए गए थे और पश्चात्वर्ती संशोधन निम्नलिखित अधिसूचना द्वारा किए गए :-

3439 G1/2009

(5849) 5850

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 1 . का.आ. सं. 2002 , तारीख 2 सितंबर , 1989

2. का.आ. सं. 710 , तारीख 4 मार्च , 1990

3. का.आ. सं. 3006 , तारीख 17 नवंबर , 1990

4. का.आ. सं. 3272 , तारीख 9 दिसंबर , 1990

5. का.आ. सं. 146 , तारीख 20 मार्च , 1993

6. का.आ. सं. 377 , तारीख 10 फरवरी , 1996

7. का.आ. सं. 379. तारीख 10 फरवरी , 1996

8. का.आ. सं. 3288 , तारीख 23 नवंबर , 1996

9 का.आ. सं. 826 , तारीख 25 अप्रैल, 1998

का.आ. सं. 2500 , तारीख 5 दिसंबर , 1998

11. का.आ. सं. 2690 , तारीख 16 सितंबर , 2003

12. का.आ. सं. 1485( अ) , तारीख 30 दिसंबर , 2003

13. का.आ. सं. 3682 , तारीख 15 अक्तूबर , 2005

14. का.आ. सं . 1529 , तारीख 6 जून , 2009

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Pension and Pensioners ' Welfare)

New Delhi , the 22nd September , 2009

SQ. 2689.- In exercise of the powers conferred by the provise to article 309 and clause ( 5) of article 148 of the Constitution , and after consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India in relation to persons serving in the Indian Audit and Accounts , Department, the President hereby makes the following rules further to amend the General Provident Fund( Central Services) Rules , 1960 , namely:--

1. ( 1) These rules may be called the General Provident Fund ( Central Services) ( Second Amendment ) Rules , 2009 .

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2 In the General Provident Fund ( Central Services) Rules, 1960, in rule, 12 , in sub- rule ( 1 ) , after clause ( f) , the following clause shall be inserted, namely :-

"(g) to meet the expenses for visiting places which, to the satisfaction of the sanctioning authority, are considered asplacesofpilgrimage or places of eminence of any religion . "

[F. No. 13/1/2006-P & PW ( F) ]

RAJ SINGH , Director Foot Note: The General Provident Fund ( Central Services) Rules , 1960 , were published in the Gazette of India , vide Notification No. S.O. 3000 , dated the 1st December, 1960 and subsequently amended vide notifications mentioned below:-

1. S.O. No. 2002 dated the 2nd September, 1989.

2. S.O. No. 710 dated the 4th March , 1990 .

3. S.O. No. 3006 dated the 17th November , 1990 ..

4. S.O. No. 3272 dated the 9th December, 1990.

5. S.O. No. 146 dated the 20th March , 1993 .

6. S.O. No. 377 dated the 10th February , 1996 .

7. S.O. No. 379 dated the 10th February, 1996 .

8. S.O. No. 3288 dated the 23rd November, 1996.

9. S.O. No. 826 dated the 25th April , 1998.

5851 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र': अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931-

10. S.O. No. 2500 dated the 5th December , 1998 .

11. S.O. No. 2690 dated the 16th September, 2003

12 S.O. No. 1485 ( E) dated the 30th December, 2003 .

13. S.O. No. 3682 dated the 15th October , 2005.

14. S.O. No. 1529 dated the 6th June , 2009.

वित्त मंत्रालय

(वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग)

नई दिल्ली , 18 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2690.-बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम, 1949 ( 1949 का 10 ) की धारा 53 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , भारत सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर , एतद्द्वारा , घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) के उप- खण्ड ( i ) के उपबंध , सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया पर उस सीमा तक लागू नहीं होंगे , जहां तक उनका संबंध सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक श्री एस. श्रीधर का कृषि वित्त निगम लिमिटेड के निदेशक मंडल में निदेशक के पद पर नामित होने से है ।

[फा. सं. 20/16/2006-बीओ -1 ]

जी. बी. सिंह , उप सचिव

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(DepartmentofFinancial Services )

New Delhi , the 18th September , 2009

S.O. 2690.-In exercise of the powers conferredby Section 53 ofthe Banking Regulation Act, 1949 ( 10 of 1949), the Government of India on the recommendation of the Reserve Bank of India , hereby declare that the provisions of sub- clause ( i ) of clause ( c) of sub - section ( 1 ) ofSection 10 ofthe said Act shall not apply to Central Bank of India in so far as it relates to the nomination of Shri S. Sridhar , Chairman & Managing Director, as director on the Board ofAgricultural Finance Corporation Limited .

[F. No. 20/ 16/2006-BO -I ]

G. B. SINGH , Dy. Secy.

(राजस्व विभाग )

( केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )

नई दिल्ली, 25 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2691. सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एत‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5 ग और 5ड़ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( 3 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2006-07 से आगे संगठन विपासना रिसर्च इंस्टीट्यूट , मुम्बई को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगे ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थात्:-

( i ) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग सामाजिक विज्ञान में अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

(ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से सामाजिक विज्ञान में अनुसंधान अथवा सांख्यिकीय अनुसंधान करेगा;

(iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता बही रखेगा । अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत् सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;

( iv ) अनुमोदित संगठन सामाजिक विज्ञान में अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत् सत्यापित ऐसे विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2. केंद्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन :-

( क ) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा 5852

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 /ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART II -SEC. 3 (ii) ] (ख ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

( ग ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप - पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित सामाजिक विज्ञान में अनुसंधान अथवा सांख्यिकीय अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा ; अथवा ( ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5ड़ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( iii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 71/2009/फा. सं. 203/13/2008-आ.क.नि.- II ]

डा. संजय कुमार लाल , अवर सचिव

(Department of Revenue)

(Central Board of Direct Taxes )

New Delhi , the 25th September , 2009

S.O. 2691.- It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Vipassana Research Institute, Mumbai has beenapproved bythe Central Government for the purpose ofclause (iii ) ofsub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 ofthe Income-taxAct, 1961 ( said Act) , read with rules 5C and 5E ofthe Income - tax Rules, 1962 (said Rules) from Assessment year 2006-07 onwards in the category of, ' Other Institution ' partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(1) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for research in social sciences;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out research in social science or statistical research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect ofthe sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section (2) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income -tax or the Director of Income- tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 139 of the said Act ;

( iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for research in social sciences and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above.

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization :-

(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub -paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or (b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for research in social sciences or statistical research referred to in sub -paragraph (iv) of paragraph 1; or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or (e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( iii) of sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the saidAct , read with rules SC and 5E of the said Rules .

[Notification No. 71/2009 F. No. 203 / 13/2008 / ITA/II ] Dr. SANJAY KUMAR LAL, Under Secy.

कार्यालय मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त

उदयपुर , 23 सितम्बर , 2009

संख्या-13/2009-10

(आयकर )

का.आ. 2692.-आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 की 43 वां) की धारा 10 के खण्ड ( 23 ग ) की उपखण्ड ( iv ) के साथ पठित आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 2 ग के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त, उदयपुर एतद्वारा " हेल्प सोसाइटी, 6 5853 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

न्यूपूर्णिमा गेस्ट हाऊस , होली चौक, चारभुजा, राजसमन्द ( राजस्थान ) " को कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2008-09 एवं आगे के निर्धारण वर्षों के लिए निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन रहते हुए उक्त उपखण्ड के प्रयोजनार्थ अधिसूचित करते हैं, अर्थात्:-

(i ) कर निर्धारिती अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल अथवा अपनी आय का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए उनका संचयन पूर्णतया तथा अनन्यतया उन उद्देश्यों के लिए करेगा जिनके लिए इसकी स्थापना की गई है;

( ii ) कर निर्धारिती उपर्युक्त कर निर्धारण वर्षों से संगत पूर्ववर्ती वर्षों की किसी भी अवधि के दौरान धारा ।। की उपधारा ( 5 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट किसी एक अथवा एक से अधिक ढंग अथवा भिन्न तरीकों से अपनी निधि ( जेवर, जवाहरात , फर्नीचर आदि के रूप प्राप्त तथा अनुरक्षित स्वैच्छिक अंशदान से भिन्न ) का निवेश नहीं करेगा अथवा उसे जमा नहीं करेगा;

( iii ) यह अधिसूचना किसी ऐसी आय के सम्बन्ध में लागू नहीं होगी , जो कि कारोबार से प्राप्त लाभ तथा अभिलाभ हो जब तक कि ऐसा कारोबार उक्त कर निर्धारिती के उद्देश्यों की प्राप्ति के लिये प्रासंगिक नहीं हो अथवा ऐसे कारोबार के सम्बन्ध में अलग से लेखा पुस्तिकाएं नहीं रखी जाती हो;

(iv ) कर निर्धारिती आयकर अधिनियम 1961 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार अपनी आय विवरणी नियमित रूप से आयकर प्राधिकारी के समक्ष दाखिल करेगा;

(v ) विघटन की स्थिति में इसकी अतिरिक्त राशियां और परिसम्पतियां समान उद्देश्यों वाले धर्मार्थ संगठन को दे दी जायेंगीं;

यह अधिसूचना केवल संस्था की ओर से आय के प्राप्तकर्ता पर ही लागू होगी न कि इस तरह के प्राप्तकर्ता द्वारा किसी अन्य प्राप्ति अथवा आय पर । संस्थाके आय की कराधेयता अथवा अन्यथा पर, आयकर अधिनियम 1961 के उपबन्धों के अनुसार पृथक रूप से विचार किया जायेगा ।

[संख्या मु.आ.आ./उदय/आ.अ. (तक)/2009-10/1459 ]

मुकेश भान्ती , मुख्य आयकर आयुक्त OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Udaipur , the 23rd September , 2009

No. 13 /2009-10

(Income-tax)

S.O. 2692.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( iv) of Clause (23C) of Section 10 of the Income- tax Act , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) read with rule 2C of the Income- tax Rules , 1962, 1 , Chief Commissioner of Incoine - tax. Udaipur hereby notify the " Help Society, New Purnima Guest House , Holy Chowk , Charbhuja , Rajsamand ( Rajasthan ) " for the purpose of the said sub - clause for the assessment years 2008-09 onwards subject to the following conditions, namely.

(i ) The assessee will apply its income , or accumulate for application , wholly and exclusively to the objeets for which it is established;

(ii) The assessee will not invest or deposit its fund (other than vo luntary contributions received and maintained in the form ofjewellery, furniture etc. ) for any period during the previous year relevant to the assessment years mentioned above otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub - section ( 5) ofSection 11 ;

(iii ) This notification will not apply in relaton to any income being profits and gains of business , unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the assessee ande separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of such business ;

(iv) The assessee will regularly file its return of income before the Income-tax authority in accordance with the provisions of the income- Tax Act, 1961 ;

(v) That in the event of dissolution , its surplus and the assets will be given to a charitable organization with similar objectives ;

Thisnotification is applicable only to the recipients of income on behalf of the asscssee and not to any other receipt or income of such recipients . Taxability or , otherwise ofthe incoine of the assessee would be separately considered as per the provisions of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 .

[No. CCIT/UDR/ITO( Tech . )/2009-10/14591 MUKESH BHANTI , Chief Commissioner of Income - tax 5854

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 /ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii )]

स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय

( स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 31 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2693.-दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में एतदद्वारा निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है ; अर्थात्ः-

2. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग । में राजस्थान स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , जयपुर द्वारा प्रदत्त डेंटल डिग्रियों को मान्यता दिए जाने के संबंध में कमांक 72 के सामने स्तंम्भ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां उसके अंतर्गत रखी जाएंगी:--

"V. गवर्नमेंट डेंटल कालेज एंड हास्पिटल , जयपुर

( i ) दंत शल्य चिकित्सा निष्णात

-कंजरवेटिव डेंटिस्ट्री

एम डी एस ( कंजरवेटिव डेंटिस्ट्री ) , राजस्थान स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , जयपुर" (यदि 16-6-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद

प्रदान की गई हो )

-आर्थोडान्टिक्स

एम डी एस ( आर्थों. ) , राजस्थान स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , जयपुर

(यदि 19-6-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद

प्रदान की गई हो )

-ओरल सर्जरी

एम डी एस ( ओरल सर्जरी ) , राजस्थान स्वाम्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय, जयपुर

(यदि 19-6-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद

प्रदान की गई हो)

-पेरियोडान्टिक्स

एम डी एस ( परियो. ) , राजस्थान स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय, जयपुर

(यदि 23-6-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद

प्रदान की गई हो)

[फा. सं. वी. 12017/ 15 /2006 -डी.ई. ]

आर. शंकरन, अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

(Department of Health and Family Welfare )

New Delhi . the 31st August . 2009

S.O. 2693. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 2 ) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act . 1948 (16 ot 1948) , the Central Government , after consultation with the Dental Council of India , hereby makes the following amendments in Part - I of the Schedule to the said Act . namely:-

2. In the existing entries of columns 2 & 3 against Serial No. 72. in Part - I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act . 1948 (16 of 1948) pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by Rajasthan University of Health Sciences . Jaipur . the following entries shall be inserted thereunder:-

"V. Government Dental College & Hospital . Jaipur

(i) Master of Dental Surgery

-Conservative Dentistry

MDS( Cons . Dentistry ) . Rajasthan University of Health Sciences . Jaipur (ifgranted on or after 16-6-2009 )

-Orthodontics

MDS ( Ortho . ) . Rajasthan University of Health Sciences . Jaipur (ifgranted on or after 19-6-2009 ) 5855 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

--Oral Surgery

MDS (Oral Surgery) , Rajasthan University of Health Sciences , Jaipur (ifgranted on or after 19-6-2009 )

-Periodontics

MDS ( Perio . ) , Rajasthan University of Health Sciences , Jaipur" .

(ifgranted on or after 23-6-2009 )

[ F.No. V. 12017/ 15/2006- DE]

R. SANKARAN , Under Secy .

विदेश मंत्रालय

(सीपीवी प्रभाग)

नई दिल्ली , 15 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2694.-राजनयिक और कोंसलीय आफिसर ( शपथ और फीस ) अधिनियम , 1948 की धारा 2 के खंड ( क ) के अनुसरण में , केंद्र सरकार एतद्द्वारा श्री एन.एस. सीवच, और बी.एन. हलदर, सहायकों को 2009 से भारत के राजदूतावास , कुवैत में सहायक कोंसुलर अधिकारी के कर्तव्यों का पालन करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[सं. टी . 4330/1/2006 ]

आर.के. पेरिनडिया , अवर सचिव (कोंसुलर )

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(C.P.V. Division )

New Delhi , the 15th September , 2009

S.O. 2694. In pursance of the clause ( a ) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers ( Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948( 41 of 1948 ) , the Central Government hereby authorise Shri N.S. Siwach and Shri B.N. Haldar . Assistants in the Embassy of India , Kuwait to perforin their duties of Assistant Consular Officer with effect from 15th September , 2009 .

[No. T. 4330/1/2006]

R.K.PERINDIA, Under Secy . ( Consular)

रसायन और उर्वरक मंत्रालय

(उर्वरक विभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 18 सितम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 2695. केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा " संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग " नियम 1976 के नियम , 10 के उप नियम (4) के अनुसरण में रसायन एंव उर्वरक मंत्रालय , उर्वरक विभाग के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रण्णाधीन एफएसीढी के कोट्टायम, कृषि सेवा केन्द्र, जिसके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक अर्थात् शत - प्रतिशत कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , को अधिसूचित करती है ।

[सं. ई. - 11011 /4/2008 हिन्दी]

सतीश चंद्र, संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF CHEMICAL AND FERTILIZERS

(Department of Fertilizers)

New Delhi , the 18th September, 2009

S.O. 2695.-In pursuance of sub- rule (4) ofthe Rule 10 ofthe Official Language " Use for Official Purposes ofthe Union " Rule , 1976 the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of the Fertilizers and Chemicals Travancore Ltd. , Kottayam Krishi Sewa Kendra under the administrative control ofthe Ministry ofChemicals & Fertilizers , Department ofFertilizers whereof more than 80 % i.e. 100% staff have acquired the working knowledge ofHindi .

[No. E- 11011 /4/2008-Hindi ]

SATISH CHANDRA , Jt . Secy.

5856

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 / ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्तामामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 26 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2696.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स सन - टैक इंस्ट्रूमेंट , # 5-5-35 /45 / 1 , तीसरा तल , प्रशांति नगर , कुकटपल्ली , हैदराबाद-500 072 आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता (यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एस टी डब्ल्यू बी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सन- टैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/06/392 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 40000 कि.ग्रा . है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 10 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

इंडीकेटर के पीछे मध्य में, पिछली प्लेट और आउटर कबर को काटकर दो छेद किए गए हैं । इन छेदों को स्टाम्प और सील के सत्यापन के लिए लीड तार से कसा गया है । उप को सील के छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम या गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार पनिचन की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त. अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2× 10 के, 5× 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 105 )/2006]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 5857 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

New Delhi, the 26th August, 2009

S.O. 2696.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge Type) with digital indication of " ST- WB " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand narne " SUN - TECH " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Sun -Tech Instruments, # 5-5-35 /45 / 1 , 3rd Floor , Prasanti Nagar , Kukatpally, Hyderabad -500 072, Andhra Pradesh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/06/392;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of40000 kg and minimum capacity of 200 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 10kg. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50-Hertz alternate current power supply.

Onthe rear middle of the indicator , two holes are made by eutting the rear plate and outer cover and fastening a leaded wire through these bolts for receiving the verification stamp and seal . It can not be opened without tampering the seal. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 100 tonne and with the number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with 'e ' value of the form 1x 10 . 2x10 or 5 × 10k , k being is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the sarne manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 105)/2006] 343991/ 09-2

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 5858

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ASVINA II , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 26 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2697.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स परफैक्ट वेइंग सिस्टम , # 83 , एम टी एच रोड , अम्बतूर इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , चैन्नै-600 098 , तमिलनाडु द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग 0.5 वाले " ए डब्ल्यू-560 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , स्वचालित , वेइंग रोड व्हीकल इन मोशन के लिए तोलन उपकरण ( टोटल व्हीकल वेइंग- एक्सल व्हीयर टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " परफैक्ट " है( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/ 492 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित वेइंग रोड व्हीकल इन मोशन के लिए तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 25000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 500 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मायमान अंतराल (डी) 10 कि. ग्रा. है । परिचालन स्पीड रेंज 1 कि.मी. प्रति घंटा से 5 कि.मी. प्रति घंटा है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

WEIGHT

AW 560

ة बाडी और सीलिंग में से लीड वायर कस कर निकाल कर इंडीकेटर के पीछे की तरफ सीलिंग व्यवस्था की गई है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 10 कि.ग्रा. के बराबर या उससे कम लिए 500 से 5000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( डी ) सहित टन से 50 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " डी " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के, 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 229 ) /2006]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 5859 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/ आश्विन 11 , 1931-

New Delhi , the 26th August , 2009

S.O. 2697.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Automatic Weighing Instrument for weighing road vehicles in motion ( Total Vehicle Weighing - Axle Weigher type ) with digital indication of "AW- 560 " series of accuracy class 0.5 and with brand name "PERFACT" (herein referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Perfact Weighing System , # 83 , M.T.H. Road , Ambattur Industrial Estate, Chennai - 600 098 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/08 /492 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based Automatic Weighing Instrument for weighing road vehicles in motion with maximum capacity of 25000 kg . and minimum capacity of500 kg . The value of scale interval (d) is 10 kg . The operating speed range is between I km per hour to 5 km per hour. It has a tare device with the 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply.

PERFECT

WEIGHT

AW 560

The sealing is provided on the back side of the indicator by passing a leaded wire fastened to the body and sealing it with leaded seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity between I tonne and up to 50 tonne and with number of scale interval in the range of 500 to 5000 for the value of scale interval ' d ' less than or equal to 10 kg . and with ' d' value of the form 1/10 . 2 10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (229 )/2006 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 5860

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 ASVINA 11 , 1931

PART 11 Sec. 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 26 अगस्त, 2000

का.आ. 2698.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का. विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें) बाट और माप मानक अर्धािनयम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स अनुपम एरोमेटिक्स, मनोकामेशवर शिव मंदिर के पास , शिवपुरा . दुर्ग-491 001 , छत्तीसगढ़ द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एस टी पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्टरलिंग " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात्, उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/06/ 517 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आंधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

STERLING

9941 विभवमापी स्केल की बाड़ी के अंदर है और कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों से रोकने के लिए विभवमापी के समायोजन के लिए स्केल की बाड़ी पर कोई छेद नहीं दिया गया है । इंडीकेटर के दोनों तरफ सीलिंग व्यवस्था की गई है और एक तार छेदों में से स्टापिंग प्लेट पर कस कर और दूसरी तरफ सीलिंग की गई है । सील को तोड़े बिना उपकरण को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 के , 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 82 ) /2006 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 5861 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

New Delhi , the 26th August , 2009

S.O. 2698.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights andMeasures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type ) with digital indication of " STP " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " STERLING" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufacturedby M/ s . Anupam Aromatics , Near Manokameshwar Shiv Mandir , Shivpura , Durg - 491 001 Chattisgarh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/06/517;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 500 kg . and minimum capacity of 2 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply.

STERLING

Thepotentiometer is inside the body of the scale and no hole is provided on the body to avoid fraudulent use by adjusting the potentiometer . The sealing is provided on the two sides of the indicator and a wire is fastened to these holes at the stamping plate and the other side for the sealing . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) ofSection 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and upto 5000kg. and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value between 100mg to 2g. and with number of verfication scale interval ( n ) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and ' e ' value ofthe form 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the sameprinciple, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (82)/2006 ]

R. MA THURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 5862

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 26 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2699.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्तमॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करतां रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स अनुपम एरोमेटिक्स, मनोकामेश्वर शिव मंदिर के पास , शिवपुरा , दुर्ग -491001 , छत्तीसगढ़ द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एस टी टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्टरलिंग " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/06/ 516 समनुदेशित किया गयां है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

STERLIN

9942

विभवमापी स्केल की बाड़ी के अंदर है और कपटपुर्ण व्यवहारों से रोकने के लिए विभवमापी के समायोजन के लिए स्केल की बाड़ी पर कोई छेद नहीं दिया गया है । इंडीकेटर के दोनों तरफ सीलिंग व्यवस्था की गई है और एक तार छेदों में से स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट पर कस कर और दूसरी तरफ सीलिंग की गई है । सील को तोड़े बिना उपकरण को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के" ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और "ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 *, 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[.फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 82 )/2006 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 5863 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3, 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

New Delhi , the 26th August , 2009

S.O. 2699.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the . Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type) with digital indication of " STT" series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " STERLING " (hereinreferred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s . Anupam Aromatics , Near Manokameshwar Shiv Mandir , Shivpura , Durg -491001 , Chattisgarh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/06/ 516;

Thesaid model is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 5 g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply.

The potentiometer is inside the body of the scale and no hole is provided on the body to avoid fraudulent use by adjusting the potentiometer . The sealing is provided on the two sides of the indicator and a wire is fastened to these holes atthe stamping plate and the other side for the sealing . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typicalschematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) ofSection 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10000 for ' e ' value between 100mg . to 2g . and with number of verfication scale interval ( n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of the form 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 82)/2006]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 5864

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 /ASVINA. 11 , 1931

[ PART II-SEC. 3( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 26 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2700.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स श्याम टेकनो , 5 अरिहन्त कॉम्पलेक्स ,स्टेशन रोड, रायपुर-492009 , छत्तीसगढ़ द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " टी एल " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " लक्ष्मी " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 06 / 518 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त माडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

इंडीकेटर के दोनों तरफ और इंडीकेटर के टाप कवर तथा बेस में छेद करके , इन छेदों में से लीड वायर कस कर निकालते हुए इंडीकेटर के सामने की तरफ लीड सील से सीलिंग की गई है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 *, 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 201 ) /2006]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 5865 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन ।। , 1931

New Delhi , the 26th August , 2009

S.O. 2700.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figüre given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - autornatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type ) with digital indication of " TL " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " LAXMI " (herein referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/ s . Shyam Techno , 5 , Arihant Complex , Station Road, Raipur-492009 Chhattisgarh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /06/ 518 ;

LAX

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of30 kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5 g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50-Hertz alternate current power supply .

The sealing is provided on the front side of weighing scale by making a hole each on both sides of the indicator and top over and base of the indicator, and then passing a leaded wire fastening to these holes and sealing it with leaded seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10000 for ' e ' value between 100mg to 2g and with number of verfication scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and ' e ' value of the form 1x 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 %, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and withthe same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (201 )/2006]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 343961/ 09-3.

5866

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 26 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2701. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स श्याम टेकनो , 5 अरिहन्त कॉम्पलेक्स ,स्टेशन रोड , रायपुर-492009 , छत्तीसगढ़ द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " पी एल " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " लक्ष्मी " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/06/ 519 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 10 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

इंडीकेटर के दोनों तरफ और इंडीकेटर के टॉप कवर तथा बेस में छेद करके , इन छेदों में से लीड वायर कस कर निकालते हुए इंडीकेटर के सामने की तरफ लीड सील से सीलिंग की गई है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 * , 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (201 )/2006] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञाम 5867 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 26th August, 2009

S.O. 2701.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type ) with digital indication of " PL " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name " LAXMI " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s . Shyam Techno , 5, Arihant Complex, Station Road, Raipur -492009 , Chhattisgarh and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/06/519 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 60 kg . and minimum capacity of 200g. The verification scale interval (e) is 10 g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply.

The sealing is provided on the front side of the indicator by making a hole each on both sides of the indicator and top over and base of the indicator , and then passing a leaded wire fastened to these holes and sealing it with leaded seal . Atypical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- section (12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate ofapproval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, and performance ofsame series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 5000 kg . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10000 for ' e ' value between 100mg . to 2g . the formand with number of verfication scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of I × 10k; 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (201 )/2006 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 5868

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3, 2009/ ASVINA 11 , 1931

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नई दिल्ली , 15 सितम्बर , 2009

कोयला मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2703.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है , कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लेखित परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में से कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है ;

का.आ. 2702.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप - नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं :

अनुसूची

क्रम संशोधित भारतीय मानक संशोधनों की संशोधन लागू होने संख्या की संख्या और वर्ष संख्या और तिथि की तिथि

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) (जिसे इसमें पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है;

(2)

(3)

(1)

(4)

1. 12269:1987

9अगस्त, 2009 14 सितम्बर , 2009

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नईदिल्ली, कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों: अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल, भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना, पुणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्धहैं ।

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले रेखांक सं. सी-1 (ई) 111/एच. आर./ 796-0709 तारीख 22 जुलाई, 2009 का निरीक्षण, वेस्टर्न कोलफीड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व विभाग ) , कोल इस्टेट , सिविल लाइन्स, नागपुर 440 001 ( महाराष्ट्र ) के कार्यालय में या मुख्य महाप्रबंधक ( एक्सप्लोरेशन डिवीजन ) , केन्द्रीय खान , योजना और डिजाइन संस्थान , गोंडवाना पैलेस , काँके रोड़ राँची के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 , काउंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता के कार्यालय में या जिला कलक्टर , छिन्दवाड़ा ( मध्य प्रदेश ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ;

[संदर्भ: सीईडी/राजपत्र ]

ए. के. सैनी , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' व प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी )

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS New Delhi , the 15th September , 2009

इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाली भूमि में , हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चारों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से 90 दिनों के भीतर , मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड, कन्हान क्षेत्र, पोस्ट डुंगरिया , तहसील जुन्नारदेव , जिला छिन्दवाडा-480 553 ( मध्य प्रदेश ) या मुख्य खनन अभियंता ( भू/राजस्व ) , वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड , राजस्व विभाग , कोल इस्टेट, सिविल लाईन्स , नागपुर-440 001 ( महाराष्ट्र) को भेजेंगे ।

S.O. 2702.-In pursuance of clause ( b ) of sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

Sl . No. No. and year of No. and year of Indian Standards the amendment Date from which the amendment

अनुसूची शारदा भूमिगत खान कन्हान क्षेत्र

shall have effect

जिला छिन्दवाड़ा ( मध्य प्रदेश )

(1)

(3)

(2)

(4)

12269: 1987

1 .

9August, 2009

(रेखांक सं. सी-1 ( ई ) 111 /एच. आर ./ 796-0709 तारीख 22 जुलाई , 2009)

14 September, 2009

तहसील जिला

क्रम ग्राम संख्या का नाम

क्षेत्रफल टिप्पणी हेक्टर

में

पटर्वारी सर्कल संख्या

1 .

13.200 भाग

जमकुण्डा

छिन्दवाड़ा

जुन्नारदेव

Copies of these amendments are available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices:NewDelhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai , and also Branch Offices : Ahemedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyberabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune and Thiruvananthapuram .

27 जुन्नारदेव छिन्दवाड़ा 206.400 भाग

उमरिया फदाली

[Ref: CED/Gazette]

A. K. SAINI , Scientist ' F ' & Head ( Civil Engg. ) 3. केओलारी

छिन्दवाड़ा 7.200 भाग

जुन्नारदेव

कला 5869 [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

MINISTRY OF COAL

NewDelhi , the29th September , 2009 4.

-27

भग

2.200

मोरकुण्ड

जुन्नारदेव छिन्दवाडा

घुट्टी

जुन्नारदेव छिन्दवाडा 38.000 भाग

कुल क्षेत्र : 267.00 हेक्टर

S.O. 2703. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that Coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the locality mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed;

(लगभग)

या 659.757 एकड़

(लगभग)

सीमा वर्णन :-

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957 ) , (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein ;

क-खः रेखा ग्राम घुट्टी में बिन्दु ' क ' से आरंभ होती है और ग्राम घुट्टी और ग्राम मोरकुण्ड, ग्राम मोरकुण्ड और ग्राम केओलारी कला , उसी तरह ग्राम केओलरी कला और ग्राम उमरी की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा को पार करती है और बिन्दु ' ख ' पर मिलती है ।

ख-गः

The plan bearing number C- 1 (E ) III/HR /796-0709 dated the 22nd July , 2009 of the area covered by this notification can be inspected at the office of the Western Coalfields Limited ( Revenue Department) , Coal Estate, Civil Lines , Nagpur - 440 001 ( Maharashtra) or at the office of theChiefGeneral Manager (Exploration Division ), Central Mine Planning and Design Institute , Gondwana Place , Kanke Road, Ranchi or at the office ofthe Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata or at the office of the District Collector, Chhindwara (Madhya Pradesh).

रेखा ग्राम उमरिया फदाली से होकर गुजरती है और ग्राम उमरिया फदाली और ग्राम केओलारी कला की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा को पार करती है और ग्राम केओलारी कला में बिन्दु ' ग ' पर मिलती है ।

ग-घः रेखा ग्राम केओलारी कला से होकर गुजरती है और ग्राम केओलारी कला और ग्राम नजरपुर की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा पर बिन्दु ' घ ' पर मिलती है ।

घ-ड़ः रेखा ग्राम केओलारी कला से होकर गुजरती है और . ग्राम केओलारी कला और ग्राम उमरिया फदाली की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा पर बिन्दु ' ड़ ' पर मिलती है ।

ड-चः

All persons interested in the lands covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , charts and other documents referred to in sub-section (7 ) of Section 13 of the said Actto the Chief Mining Engineer ( Land/Revenue) , Western Coalfields Limited , Revenuę Department , Coal Estate, Civil Lines , Nagpur - 440001 ( Maharashtra) or office ofthe ChiefGeneral Manager, Western Coalfields Limited , Kanhan Area , PO : Dungaria , Tahsil Junnardeo , District Chhindwara - 480 553 (Madhya Pradesh ) within ninety daysfrom the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette.

SCHEDULE

रेखा ग्राम उमरिया फदाली से होकर गुजरती है और ग्राम उमरिया फदाली और ग्राम जमकुण्डा की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा पर बिन्दु ' च' पर मिलती है ।

SHARDA UNDERGROUND MINE KANHAN AREA

DISTRICT CHHINDWARA , ( MADHYA PRADESH)

[Plan bearing number C- 1 ( E) III /HR/ 796-0709 dated the 22nd July, 2009]

च-छ-ज- झः रेखा ग्राम जमकुण्डा से होकर गुजरती है फिर बिन्दु ' छ' और ' ज ' के पास से गुजरते हुए ग्राम जमकुण्डा और ग्राम उमरिया फदाली की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा परबिन्दु ' झ ' पर मिलती है ।

Remarks

S1 .

Tahsil District

झ-ञ-टः

Area in

Palwari circle number

hectares

Name

No. of

Village

1. Jamkunda 27

रेखा ग्राम उमरीया से होकर गुजरती है फिर बिन्दु ' ञ' के पास से गुजरती है और ग्राम उमरीया फदाली और घुट्टी की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा को पार करती है फिर ग्राम घुट्टी से होकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु ' ट ' पर मिलती है ।

Junn- Chhin- 13.200 Part ardeo dwara

206.400 Part

Umriya 27 Fadali

Junn- Chhin- ardeo dwara

ट-ठ-ड- कः रेखा ग्राम घु‌ट्टी से होकर जाती है और बिन्दु ' ठ' -' ड ' के पास से गुजरते हुए आंरभिक बिन्दु ' क' पर मिलती है ।

dwara

Keolari Kala

3. 25 Junn- Chhin- 7.200 Part ardeo

[फा. सं. 43015/25/2009- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]

4. Morkund 27

2.200 Parı

Junn- ardeo

Chhin- dwara

एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव 5870

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 / ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2

नई दिल्ली , 29 सितम्बर , 2009

5 Ghutti

Chhin- 38.000 Part

Junn-

ardeo dwara

Total area : 267.000 Hectares (approximately)

659.757 Acres (approximately)

Boundary Description: ---

का.आ. 2704. केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 7 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 623 तारीख 5 मार्च , 2009 जो भारत के राजपत्र भाग II , खण्ड 3 , उपखण्ड ( ii ) तारीख 14 मार्च , 2009 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की 257.017 हेक्टर या 635.089 एकड़ माप वाली भूमि और उस पर के सभी अधिकारों का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;

A-B: Line start from Point ' A ' in village Ghutti and crosses common village boundary of villages Ghutti and Morkund , Morkund and Keolari Kala Keolari Kala and Umariya Fadali and meets at Point ' B ' .

B-C:

और कंन्द्रीय सरकार का पूर्वोक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और छत्तीसगढ़ सरकार से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 257.017 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 635.089 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि के सभी अधिकार अर्जित किए जाने चाहिए;

Linepasses through village Umriya Fadali and crosses common village boundary of villages Umriya Fadali and Keolari Kala and meets at Point ' C' at village Keolari Kala .

C-D: Line passes through village Keolari Kala and meets at Point ' D ' on common village boundary ofvillages Keolari Kala and Umariya Fadali .

D- E:

अतः अब केन्द्रीय कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम, 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 257.017 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 635.089 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि के सभी अधिकार अर्जित किए जाते हैं ।

Line passes through village Keolari Kala and meets at Point ' E ' on common village boundary ofvillages Keolari Kala and Umariya Fadali .

E - F : Line passes through village Umariya Fadali and meets at Point ' F ' on common village boundary of villages Umariya Fadali and Jamkunda.

इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. एसईसीएल /बीएसपी/जीएम/( पीएलजी ) /भूमि/343 तारीख 17 जून , 2009 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर , कोरबा ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , । , कांउसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट कोलकाता-700001 के कार्यालय में या साउथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व अनुभाग ) सीपत रोड, बिलासपुर 495006 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

F-G-H- I :

अनुसूची

पोंडी ब्लाक पहला विस्तार, ( गेवरा विस्तार ) , गेवरा क्षेत्र Line passes through village Jamkunda and passes nearby Point ' G ' - ' H ' and meets at Point 'I' on common village boundary of villages Jamkunda and Umariya Fadali .

जिला-कोरबा ( छत्तीसगढ़ )

(रेखांक संख्या एसईसीएल/बीएसपी /जीएम ( पीएलजी) / भूमि/343 तारीख 17 जून , 2009 )

सभी अधिकार

1 - J - K : Line passes through village Umariya Fadali and passes nearby Point ' J ' then crosses common village boundary of villages Umariya Fadali and Ghutti then passes through village Ghutti and meets at Point ' K' .

तहसील जिला

क्रम ग्राम

खेवट पटवारी

क्षेत्र टिप्पणी K- L-M -A:

हेक्टर

सं. का

संख्या हल्का

में

संख्या

नाम

Line passes through village Ghutti and passes nearby Point ' L ' ' M ' and meets at starting Point . 'A' .

1 2

[No. 43015 /25 /2009 - PRIW -1 ]

भाग

1 . आमगाँव 36 12 कटघोरा कोरबा 32.599 M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy .

5871 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

6. 7

367/1 से 367/3 , 368 से 371 , 372/1 , 372/2 , 373/1 से 3.73/4.

2. रलिया

34 20

कोरबा 73.745

कटघोरा

(4) ग्राम भठोरा ( भाग ) में अर्जित किये प्लाटं संख्या:

बहानपाट

30 20

24.823 भाग

कटघोरा कोरबा

4. भठोरा

भाग

29 20 कटघोरा कोरबा 55.828

कोरबा 70.022 भाग

कटघोरा

भिलाईबाजार 31

कुल क्षेत्र :257.017 हेक्टर ( लगभग )

या 635.089 एकड़ ( लगभग)

( 1 ) ग्राम आमगाँव ( भाग ) में अर्जित किये गये प्लाट संख्याः

438/1 से 438/3 , 439/1 , 439/2 , 440 , 441/1 से 441/3 ,442/1 से 442/9 , 443/1 , 443/2 , 444/1 से 444/4, 445/10 से445/13 , 446से 448 , 449/1 से 449/4 , 450, 451/1 , 451/5 , 452 , 453/1 , 453/2, 454/1 , 454/3 , 455/1 , 455/2 , 456, 457/1 से 457/3, 458 से 460 , 461/1 से 461/5 , 462 , 598/1 से 598/4 , 599 , 600, 601 ( भाग) , 602/1 , 602/2 , 603 , 604/1 , 604/2 , 605 , 616 , 617/1 , 617/2 , 618 , 619 , 620, 621/1 से 621/5 , 622, 623/1 से 623/9, 624 से 629 , 630/1 से 630/8 , 631/1 , 631/2, 632/1 से 632/3 , 633/1 , 633/2 , 633/31, 633/3 के एच , 633/4, 633/5 , 648/1 ( भाग ) , 648/2 , 648/3 , 648/4 , 648/4के, 648/5 से 648/14.

( 2) ग्राम रलिया ( भाग ) में अर्जित किये गये प्लाट संख्याः

6/1 से 6/4 , 14/1 से 14/38 , 15/1 से 15/3 , 16/1 ( भाग ) , 16/2 से 16/7 , 18/1 से 18/4 , 19 , 20/1 से 20/3 , 25 , 32/1 ( भाग ) , 32/2से 32/11 , 33 , 35/1 , 35/2 , 36 , 37 , 38/1 ( भाग ) , 38/2 से 38/6, 194 से 197 , 198( भाग ) , 210( भाग ) , 211/1 से 211/3 , 212, 213 , 220 , 221 , 224/1 , 224/2 , 225/1 से 225/3 , 226, 227 , 231 ( भाग ) , 233 ( भाग ) , 234, 235 .

(3 ) ग्राम बहानपाट ( भाग ) में अर्जित किये गये प्लाट संख्या :

116 ( भांग ) , 153/1 से 153/7 , 154/1 , 154/2 , 155/1 से 155/4 , 156 , 157 , 158/1 से 158/8 , 159/1 से 159/4 , 160/1 , से 160/4 , 161 से 164 , 165/1 , 165/2 , 166 , 167 , 168/1 से 168/4 , 169/1 , 169/2 , 170 , 171/1 से 171/4 , 172/1 , 172/2 , 173 , 174/1 से 174/4 , 175/1 से 175/3 , 176/1 से 176/3 , 177/1 से 177/3 , 178/1 से 178/3 , 179 , 180/1 , 180/2 , 181 से 191 , 192/1 , 192/2 , 193/1 से 193/5 , 194/1 से 194/4 , 195/1 , 195/2 , 196/1 , 196/2 , 197 , 198 , 199/1 से 199/6 , 200 , 201, 202/1 से 202/6 , 203/1 से 203/3 , 204/1 से 204/4 , 205/1 , 205/2 , 206/1 , 206/2 , 207 , 208/1 से 208/7 , 209/1 , 209/2 , 210 , 211/1 , 211/2 , 212/1 , 212/2 , 213/1 , 213/2 , 214, 215/1 से 215/4 , 216 , 217 , 218/1 से 218/3 , 219 से 221 , 222/1 से 222/7 , 223/1 से 223/3 , 224 , 225/1 , 225/2 , 226से 231 , 232/1 , 232/2 , 233 , 234/1 से 234/6 , 235 , 236, 237/1 से 237/3 , 238/1 के , 238/1 केएच , 238/1 जी, 238/1 जीएच , 238/1 एएनजीए , 239/1 , 239/2 , 240 से 243, 244/1 से 244/3 , 245 , 246/1 , 246/2 , 247 , 248/1 , 248/2 249, 250/1 से 250/5 , 251 , 252/1 से 252/7 , 253 , 254 , 255/1 , 255/2 , 256/1 , 256/2 , 257 , 258 , 259( भाग ) , 260( भाग ) , 261 ( भाग ) , 272 ( भाग ) , 273/1 से 273/6, 274 , 275, 276( भाग ) , 277 ( भाग ) , 278/1 से 278/5 , 279 , 280/1 , 280/2 , 281/1 , 281/2 , 282 , 283 , 284/1 , 284/2 , 285/1 से 285/3 , 286 , 287/1 से 287/3 , 288 , 289 ( भाग ) , 305 ( भाग ) , 306 से 308 , 309/1 से 309/4 , 310 से 312 , 313/1 , 313/2 , 314 से 316, 317/1 से 31,7/3 , 318/1 से 318/3 , 319/1 से 319/3, 320, 321 , 322/1 से 322/5 , 323 , 324/1 , 324/2 , 325 से 328 , 329/1 , 329/2 , 330/1 से 330/4 , 331/1 से 331/4 , 332 , 333/1 से 333/5 , 334/1 से 334/5, 335 , 336, 337/1 से 337/4, 338, 339/1 से 339/8 , 340 से 343 , 344/1 , 344/2 , 345 . 346/1 , 346/2 , 347/1 से 347/3 , 348 349( भाग ) , 350 . 351 , 352( भाग ) , 353 ( भाग ) , 354( भाग ) , 355 से 358 , 359 (भाग ) , 360/1 , 360/2 , 361 से 364 , 365/1 से 365/5 . 366से 369 , 370/1 से 370/5, 371/1 , 372, 373/1 से 373/4, 374/1 से 374/9 , 375( भाग ) , 376, 377, 378( भाग ) , 393( भाग ) , 394( भाग ) , 395, 396/1 , 396/2 , 397, 398/1 से 398/3, 399/1 से 399/3 , 400, 401 , 402( भाग ) , 403 ( भाग ) , 404( भाग ) , 405/1 , 405/2, 406( भाग ) , 407 ( भाग ) , 412 ( भाग ) . 413( भाग) , 414( भाग ) , 432 ( भाग ) , 433 , 434, 435/1 से 435/5 , 436/1 , 436/2 , 437/1 , 438 ( भाग ) ; 439. 440 . 441/1 , 441/2 , 442/1 से 442/11 , 443 ( भाग ) , 444( भाग ) . 466( भाग ) , 467( भाग ) , 469( भाग ) , 470( भाग ) .

77/1 से 77/17 , 78/1 , 78/2 , 79/1 से 79/4 , 80 से 82 , 83/1 ,. 83/2, 84/1 से 84/14 , 280/1 से 280/12 , 281/1 , 281/2 , 282 , 283/1 से 283/9 , 284/1 से 284/9 , 285 , 286/1 से 286/7 , 287 , 288/1 से 288/15 , 289/1 , 289/2 , 290 , 291/1 , 291/2 , 292 , 293/1 से 293/5 , 294 से 296 , 297/1 से 297/4, 298, 299 , 300/1 से 300/12 , 301/1 से 301/14 , 302 , 303/1 से 303/8, 311/1 से 311/9 , 337 , 338/1 से 338/4 , 339 , 340/1 से 340/16 , 341 , 342/1 , 342/2 , 343 से 345 , 346/1 से 346/7 , 347 से 352 , 353/1 से 353/4 , 354 , 355/1 से 355/5 , 356/1 , 356/2, 357/1 से 357/20 , 358 से 362, 363/1 , 363/2 , 364/1 ,, 364/2 , 365/1 से 365/4, 366/1 से 366/4 366/5के , 366/5 केएच , 366/5जी , 366/5 जीएच , 366/5 एएनजी , 366/5सीएच , 366/ 5 सीएचएच , 366/5जे , 366/6 से 366/17 ,

( 5 ) ग्राम भिलाईबाजार ( भाग ) में अर्जित किये प्लाट संख्या :

5872

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 / ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

सीमा से होती हुई ग्राम रलिया- भिलाई बाजार के सम्मिलित सीमा में बिन्दु " ज " पर मिलती है ।

ञ-त रेखा ग्राम भिलाई बाजार- रलिया के सम्मिलित सीमा से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " त " पर मिलती है ।

त-थ रेखा ग्राम पोंडी- भिलाई बाजार के सम्मिलित सीमा से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " थ " पर मिलती है ।

थ-द रेखा ग्राम पोंडी- बहानपाट के सम्मिलित सीमा से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " द " पर मिलती है ।

द-ध रेखा ग्राम बहानपाट के प्लाट संख्या 77 , 79/1 , 83 , 84, 288 , 286 , 280/4 , 303/2 , 311/1 , 311/2 , 311/3 , 337, 338/1 , 338/3 , 339 , 340 की उत्तरी सीमा से गुजरती हुई ग्राम बहानपाट- भिलाई बाजार के सम्मिलित सीमा में बिन्दु " ध " पर मिलती है ।

ध-न रेखा ग्राम भिलाई बाजार- भठोरा के सम्मिलित सीमा से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " न " पर मिलती है ।

न - ट-ठ

1 , 2/1 , 2/2 , 3 से 6 , 7/1 , 7/2 , 8 , 9/1 से 9/4 , 10 , 11/1 , 11/2; 12 से 15 , 16/1 से 16/4 , 17 , 18/1 , 18/2 , 19/1 , 19/2 , 20/1 से 20/4 , 21 से 24, 25/1 , 25/2 , 26/1 , 26/2 , 27 से 31 , 32/1, 32/2, 33 से 51 , 52/1 से 52/12 , 53 से 57 , 58/1 से 58/5 , 59/1 , 59/2 , 60/1 , 60/2 , 61/1 , 61/2 , 62/1 , 62/2 , 63 से65 , 66/1 , 66/2 , 67/1 से 67/3 , 68/1 से 68/22 ,69 से 71 , 72/172/2, 73 , 74/1 से 74/4 , 75/1 , 75/2, 76, 77/1 से 77/4 , 78/1 , 78/2, 79/1 से 79/4 , 80 , 81 , 82/1 से 82/4 , 83/1 , 83/2 , 84/1 , 84/2 , 106/1 से 106/8 , 107/1 से 107/5 , 108 , 109 , 110/1 से 110/7 , 111 , 111/2 , 112/1 से 112/3 , 113/1 , 113/2 , 114/1 , 114/4 से 114/7 , 115/1 , 115/2 , 195/1 , 195/2के, 195/2केएच , 195/2जी , 195/3 से 195/12 , 196/1 , 196/2 , 197/1 , 197/2 , 198/1 , 198/2 , 199 , 200/1 के , 200/1 केएच , 200/2से 200/4 , 201 से 203 , 206 से 217 , 218/1 , 218/2 , 219 , 220/1 से 220/3 , 221 , 222 , 240 से 246 , 247/1 , 247/2 , 248/1 , 248/2, 249/1 से 249/3 , 250/1 से 250/5 , 251/1 , 251/2 , 252 से 254 , 255/1 , 255/2 , 256 से 258 , 259/1 , 259/2, 260/1 से 260/3, 261 से 263 , 264/1 से 264/3 , 265 से 267 , 268/; से 268/3, 269/1 से 269/4 , 270/1 से 270/5 , 271/1 से 271/4 , 272 . सीमा वर्णन :--

रेखा ग्राम भठोरा के प्लाट संख्या 153/2 की पश्चिमी सीमा , प्लाट संख्या 153/2 , 153/1 की उत्तरी सीमा, प्लाट संख्या 156 , 157,116 की पश्चिमी सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " ठ " पर मिलती है ।

ठ-ड

रेखा ग्राम भठोरा के प्लाट संख्या 116 , 261 , 260/2 , 260/1 , 259/ 7 ख , 272 , 276 से गुजरती है फिर प्लाट संख्या 275 की उत्तरी सीमा, प्लाट संख्या 277/2 , 289 , 375 , 378 , 393 , 394 , 414 से होती हुई बिन्दु " ड" पर मिलती है ।

ड-ढ-ण

क-ख रेखा ग्राम आमगाँव में बिन्दु " क " से आरंभ होती है और प्लाट संख्या 598/1 , 599 , 600-601/2 ,601/3 के पूर्वी सीमा , प्लाट संख्या 602, 603 ,461 ,445/2 , 439 की उत्तरी सीमा फिर प्लाट संख्या 438 , 441/2 की पूर्वी सीमा , प्लाट संख्या 630 /2,630/ 1 , 633/2 , 633/1 , 648/1 की उत्तरी सीमा से गुजरती हुई ग्राम आमगाँव - रलिया के सम्मिलित सीमा में बिन्दु ' ख' पर मिलती है ।

ख-ग रेखा ग्राम आमगाँव- रलिया के सम्मिलित सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " ग " पर मिलती है ।

रेखा ग्राम भठोरा के प्लाट संख्या 414 , 413 , 402 , 403, 404 , 407 , 406/1 , 402/2 , 359 , 354 , 347 , 348 , बिन्दु" ढ " , प्लाट संख्या 350-351-352, 353 से गुजरती है फिर प्लाट संख्या 433 , 434 की उत्तरी सीमा और प्लाट संख्या 438 , 443 , 444,446 , 467 , 469, 470 से होती हुई ग्राम भिलाई बाजार - भठोरा के सम्मिलित सीमा में बिन्दु " ण " पर मिलती है । ग-घ रेखा ग्राम रलिया के प्लाट संख्या 6/1 , 6/2 , 14 , 15 , 20,25 , 32/4, 32/2 की उत्तरी सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " घ " पर मिलती है ।

ण-प रेखा ग्राम भिलाई बाजार- भठोरा के सम्मिलित सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " प " पर मिलती है ।

घ-ड़-च रेखा ग्राम रलिया के प्लाट संख्या 33 की पश्चिमी सीमा , बिन्दु" ड़" प्लाट संख्या 38/1 से होती हुई बिन्दु " च" पर मिलती है ।

प-फ

च-छ-ज-झ रेखा ग्राम रलिया के प्लाट संख्या 38/1 की पूर्वी सीमा , बिन्दु" छ " , प्लाट संख्या 38/1 की दक्षिणी सीमा, बिन्दु "ज " , प्लाट संख्या 38/1 , 38/2 की पूर्वी सीमा से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " झ " पर मिलती है ।

झ-ञ रेखा ग्राम रलिया के प्लाट संख्या 195 , 196 , 197 , 198/ 5क , 198 ( भाग ) , 224, 226 , 231 , 221 , 220 , 211 की उत्तरी सीमा , प्लाट संख्या 210 की पश्चिमी

रेखा ग्राम भिलाई बाजार के प्लाट संख्या 272 की दक्षिणी सीमा और प्लाट संख्या 266 , फिर प्लाट संख्या 240, 241 की पूर्वी सीमा और प्लाट संख्या 241 , 242 , 247/1, 247/2 , 248/2 की दक्षिणी सीमा , प्लाट संख्या 220/1 , 221 , 222 के पूर्वी सीमा फिर प्लाट संख्या 222 की दक्षिणी सीमा , प्लाट संख्या 206 , 203 की पूर्वी, प्लाट संख्या 203 , 202 की दक्षिणी , प्लाट संख्या 195/6, 195/3 की पूर्वी सीमा से गुजरती है फिर प्लाट संख्या 195/3 , 195/4 की दक्षिणी , प्लाट संख्या 373/3 , [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

5873

भारत काराजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

373/4 की पूर्वी, प्लाट संख्या 114/1 , 114/6, 114/5 , 114/4 , 113 , 110 के दक्षिणी , प्लाट संख्या 109 की पूर्वी और दक्षिणी , प्लाट संख्या 80 , 81 की पूर्वी, प्लाट संख्या 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 की दक्षिणी सीमा से गुजरती है उसके बाद प्लाट संख्या 68/9 , 68/5 की पूर्वी सीमा से होती हुई ग्राम भिलाई बाजार - मुड़ियानार की सम्मिलित सीमा में बिन्दु " फ " पर मिलती है ।

फ-ब

रेखा ग्राम भिलाई बाजार - मुड़ियानार की सम्मिलित सीमा से होती हुई बिन्द " ब " पर मिलती है । ब-भ-म रेखा ग्राम भिलाई बाजार - रलिया की सम्मिलित सीमा और बिन्दु " भ " से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " म " पर मिलती है । म-मा रेखा ग्राम रलिया के प्लाट संख्या 210/4 , 213 , 212 की दक्षिणी सीमा , फिर प्लाट संख्या 233, 231 से होकर प्लाट संख्या 226 , 225 की दक्षिणी सीमा और प्लाट संख्या 198 से होकर प्लाट संख्या 198/5 घ, 194, 38/2 , 38/6 की दक्षिणी सीमा तथा प्लाट संख्या 38/1 से होकर प्लाट संख्या 35 , 36 की दक्षिणी सीमा और प्लाट संख्या 34 , 33 , 32,16 से गुजरती है फिर प्लाट संख्या 18 की दक्षिणी सीमा और प्लाट संख्या 16 से गुजरती हुई ग्राम रलिया आमगॉव के सम्मिलित सीमा पर बिन्दु " म । " पर मिलती है ।

मा -य रेखा ग्राम आमगाँव- सरईसिंगार की सम्मिलित सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " य " पर मिलती है ।

य-क रेखा ग्राम आमगाँव के प्लाट संख्या 616 , 617/1 , 617/2 , 454/1 , 605 , 604/2 , 601/3 , 600-601/2 , 598/2.598/ 1 की पश्चिमी फिर प्लाट संख्या 598/1 की उत्तरी सीमा से गुजरती हुई आरंभिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है ।

[फा.सं. 43015/9/2007- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]

/ एम. , शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 29th September , 2009 S.O. 2704. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 623 dated the 5th March , 2009 , issued under sub- section (1 ) of Section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) and published in the Gazette of India , Part - II , Section 3 , Sub- section ( ii ) dated the 14th March , 2009 , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to acquire 257.017 hectares or 635.089Acres land and rights in the locality specified in the Schedule appended to that notification;

Andwhereas, the Competent authority , in pursuance of Section 8 of the said Act , has made his report to the Central Government ;

And whereas , the Central Government after considering the aforesaid report and after re -consulting theGovernment of Chhattisgarh , is satisfied that the lands measuring 257.017 hectares ( approximately) or 635.089 acres(approximately) described in the Schedule appended hereto, should be acquired;

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub section ( 1 ) of Section 9 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Acı , 1957 , the Central Government hereby declares that the land measuring 257.017 hectares ( approximately ) or 635.089 acres ( approximately ) as all rights in or over such lands as described in the Schedule are hereby acquired.

The Plan bearing number SECL/ BSP/GM/ (PLG )/ LAND/ 343 dated 17th June , 2009 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the Office of the Collector. Korba (Chhattisgarh ) or in the office of the Coal Controller, 1 Council House Street , Kolkata - 700001 or in the Office ofthe South Eastern Coalfield Limited (Revenue Section) Seepat Road . Bilaspur-495006 ( Chhattisgarh);

SCHEDULE

Pondi Block 1st Extension ( Gevra Extension ),

Gevra Area District - Korba , Chhattishgarh

(Plan number SECL BSP GM ( PLG )/ LAND/ 343 dated the 17th June , 2009 ) ALL RIGHTS:

Name of village

Sl . No.

Khewat Number

Tahsil

District

Rem.

Area in hectares

Patwari

Halka Number

12 1. Amgaon

2. Ralia

3. Bahanpat

4. Bhathora

19 5. Bhilaibazar

Part

32.599

Korba

Katghora

Part

73.745

Katghora Korba

Part

24.823

Korba

Katghora

55.828

Part Korba

Katghora

70.022

Part Korba

Katghora

Total.:-257.017 hectares (Approximately) or 635.089 acres (Approximately) 5874

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii )| ( 1) Plot Numbers acquired in village Amgaon ( part ) : - 438/ 1 to438/3,439/1 , 439/2,440 , 441/1 to 441/3,442/ 1 to 442 / 9,443/1,443/2,444/1 to 444/4,445/ 10 to 445/ 13,446 to448,449/ 1 to 449/4,450,451/ 1 to 451 /5,452,453/ 1,453/ 2,454/ 1,454/3 , 455/1,455/2,456,457/1 to 457/3 , 458,to 460, 461/1 to 461/5 , 462; 598/1 to 598/4 , 599, 600, 601 ( P) , 602/1 , 602/2,603,6 1,604/2,605,616, 617/1 , 617/2, 618,619, 620 , 621/1 to 621 / 5,622,623 / 1 to 623/9 , 624 to 629, 630/1 to 630/8 , 631/ 1,631/ 2,632/ 1 to 632/3 , 633/1.633/2,633/3k , 633 /3kh , 633/4, 633/ 5,648/ 1 (P ) , 648/2,648/ 3,648/4,648 /4K, 648/5 to 648/14.

288 , 289 ( P ) , 305 ( P) , 306 to 308 , 309/1 to 309/4,310to 312, 313/1.313/2,314 to 316,317/ 1 to 317/3,318/ 1 to 3 18 /3,319/ 1 to 319 /3,320,321,322 / 1 to 322/5,323,324/ 1 , 324/ 2,325 to 328,329/1,329/ 2 , 330/1 to 330/4 , 331/1 to 331/4,332,333/1 to 333/5 , 334/1 to 334/5 , 335 , 336, 337/1 to 337/4,338,339/1 to339/8 , 340 to 343 , 344/1,344/2,345,346/1 , 346/2 , 347/1 to 347/3,348 , 349( P ), 350, 351 , 352 (P), 353 ( P), 354(P) , 355 to 358,359( P) , 360/1 , 360/2 , 361 to 364 , 365/1 to 365/5 , 366 to 369,370/1 to370/5,371/ 1,372,373/ 1 to 373/4 , 374/1 to 374/ 9,375 (P) , 376 , 377 , 378( P), 393( P ), 394( P ), 395. 396/ 1,396/2, 397,398 / 1 to 398/3 , 399/1 to 399/3 , 400 , 401 , 402 ( P ), 403 ( P ) , 404(P) ,405/1,405/ 2 , 406 ( P) , 407 ( P) , 412( P) , 413 (P ) , 414( P ), 432(P), 433,434, 435/1 to 435/5, 436/ 1,436/2,437/1 , 438 ( P) , 439,440,441/1,441 /2, 442/ t to442/ 11,443( P ) , 444( P) , 466(P) , 467(P) . 469( P), 470(P) .

(2) Plot Numbers acquired in village Ralia ( part ) : - 6/1 to 6/4, 14/1 to 14/38, 15/1 to 15/3 , 16/1 ( P) , 16/2 to 16/7, 18/1 to 18/4, 19 , 20/1 to 20/3 , 25 , 32/1 ( P), 32/2 to 32/11 , 33.35/1,35/ 2,36,37,38 / 1 ( P) , 38/2 to 38/6, 194 to 197, 198 ( P). 210(P), 211/1 to 211 /3,212,213,220,221,224/ 1,224/ 2,225 / 1 to 225 / 3,226,227,231 ( P) , 233( P) , 234, 235 .

(3) Plot Numbers acquired in village Bahanpat ( part ) : - 77/ 1 to 77 / 17,78 / 1,78 /2 , 79/1 to 79/4 , 80 to 82 , 83/1 , 83/2 , 84/1 to 84/14 , 280/1 to 280/12 , 28171 , 281/2 , 282 , 283/1 to 283/9 , 284/1 to 284/9 , 285, 286/1 to 286/7 , 287, 288/1 to 288/15, 289/1,289/2 , 290 , 291 / 1,291 /2 , 292 , 293/1 to 293/5 , 294 to 296, 297/1 to 297/4,298 , 299 , 300/1 to 300/12 , 301/1 to301 / 14 , 302 , 303/1 to 303/8 , 31 1/1 to 3.11 /9 , 337 , 338/1 to 338/4 , 339,340/ 1 to 340/16, 341 , 342/1 , 342/2 , 343 to 345,346/ 1 to 346/7, 347 to 352 , 353/1 to 353/4, 354, 355/1 to 355/5 , 356/1 , 356/2 , 357/1 to 357/20 , 358 to 362, 363 / 1,363/2,364/ 1,364/ 2,365 / 1 to 365 /4,366/ 1 to 366/4 366/5k , 366/ 5kh . 366/ 5g , 366/5gh , 366/ 5ang , 366/5ch , 366/5chh , 366/ 5j , 366/6 to 366/ 17. 367/1 to 367/3 , 368 to 371 , 372/1 , 372/2 , 373/1 to 373/4.

(5) Plot Numbers acquired in village Bhilaibazar ( part ) : 1 , 2/1 , 2/2 , 3 to 6 , 7/1 , 7/2,8,9/ 1 to 9/4 , 10, 11/1 , 11/2 , 12 to 15,16/ I to 16/4,17,18/ 1,18/2,19/ 1,19/2 , 20/1 to 20/4, 21 to 24, 25/1 , 25/ 2,26/ 1,26/ 2, 27 to 31 , 32/1 , 32/2 , 33 to 51 , 52/1 to 52 / 12,53 to 57,58/ 1 to 58 /5,59/ 1,59 /2,60/ 1,60/ 2,61/ 1,61/2,62/ 1,62/2,63 to 65 , 66/ 1,66/2,67 / 1 to 67/3,68/ 1 to 68 /22,69 to 71,72/ 1,72/ 2,73,74/ 1 to 74/4,75/ 1,75/2,76,77/ 1 to 77/4 , 78/ 1,78/2 , 79/1 to 79/4 , 80 , 81 , 82/1 to 82/4, 83/ 1,83/2,84/ 1,84/ 2,106/1 to 106/8,107/ 1 to 107/5,108,109,110/ 1 to 11017,111 / 1,111 /2,112/ 1 to 112/3 , 113/1 , 113/2,114/ 1,114/4 to 114/7,115/ 1,115/2,195/ 1 , 195 /2k , 195/2kh , 195/2g, 195/3 to 195/12, 196/ 1, 196/2 , 197/1 , 197/2 , 198/1 , 198/2 , 199 , 200/ [ k, 200/ 1kh, 200/2 to 20014,201 to 203,206 to 217,218 / 1,218/2,219,220/ 1 to 220/3 , 221 , 222, 240 to 246,247/ 1,247/2,248/ 1 , 248/2 . 249/1 to 249/3,250/ 1 to 250/5,251 / 1,251 /2,252 to 254,255/ 1,255/2, 256 to 258 , 259/1 , 259/2,260 / 1 to 260/3,261 to 263 , 264/1 to 264/3 , 265 to 267 , 268/1 to 268/3 , 269/1 to269/4 , 270/1 to 270/5,271 / 1 to 271/4,272,

BoundaryDescription

A-B Line starts from point ' A' in Village Amgoan and passes along eastern boundary of plot number 598/1 , 599 , 600-601 /2 , 601/3 , then northern boundary ofplot number 602, 603, 461 , 445/2, 439, eastern boundary of plot number 438, 441/2 , northern boundary of plot number 630/2, 630/1 , 633/2 , 633/ 1,648/ 1 and meets at point'B' on the common boundary of village Amgoan -Ralia .

B-C Lines passes along common boundary of villagesAmgoan - Ralia and meets at point ' C' .

(4) Plot Numbers acquired in village Bhathora ( part ): - 116( P ) , 153/1 to 153/7、154/ 1,154/2,155/ 1 to 155/ 4,156,157,158/ 1 to 158/8,159/ 1 to 159/4 , 160/1 , to 160/4, 161 to 164, 165/1 , 165/2 , 166 , 167, 168/1 to 168/4 , 169/1 , 169/2 , 170 , 171/1 to 171 / 4,172/ 1,172/ 2,173 , 174/1 to 174/ 4,175 / 1 to 175/3,176 / 1 to 176/3,177 / 1 to 177/3 , 178/1 to 178/3 , 179 , 180/1 , 180/2,181 to 191. 192/1 , 192/2 , 193/1 to 193/5 , 194/1 to 194/4 , 195/1 , 195/2 , 196/ 1,196 /2 , 197 , 198 , 199/1 to 199/6 , 200, 201 , 202/1 to 202/6 , 203/1 to 203/3 , 204/1 to 204/4, 205/ 1 , 205/2 , 206/1 , 206/2 , 207 , 208/1 to 208 /7,209/ 1,209/ 2,210,211 / 1,211 /2,212/ 1 , 212/2,213/ 1,213 /2,214,215 /1 to215/ 4,216,217,218 / 1 to 218/3 , 219 to 221 , 222/1 to 222/7 , 223/1 to 223/3 , 224 , 225/ 1,225 /2 , 226 to 231 , 232/1 , 232/2 , 233 , 234/1 to 234/6 , 235, 236, 237/1 to 237/3 , 238/1 k, 238/1 kh , 238/1 g, 238/1 gh, 238/1 anga , 239/1 , 239/2; 240 to 243 , 244/1 to 244 / 3,245, 246/1,246/2 , 247 , 248/1 , 248/2 , 249 , 250/1 to 250/5 , 251 , 252/1 to 252/7,253 , 254, 255/ 1,255/2 , 256/ 1,256/2,257 , 258 , 259( P) , 260( P) , 261 (P ), 272 (P ) , 273/1 to 273/6,274,275 , 276( P) , 277 (P) , 278/1 to 278 /5,279,280/ 1 , 280/2, 281 / 1,281 / 2,282,283,284/ 1 , 284/2 , 285/1 to 285/3 , 286, 287/1 to 287/3 ,

C-D Line passes along the northern boundary of plotsnumber 6/1 , 6/2 , 14,15,20,25, 32/4, 32/2 andmeetsat point 'D' in village Ralia .

[भाग -खण्ड 3 (i) ]

5875

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

D-E-F Line passes along western boundary of plot number 33 , point 'E' , through plot number 38/1 and meets at point' F' .

F-G-H- 1 Line passes along eastern boundary of plot. number 38/1 , point 'G' , southern boundary of plot number 38/1 , point 'H' , eastern boundary of plot number 38/1 , 38/2 and meets at point 'l ' in the village Ralia .

I-J

Line passes along northern boundary of plot number 195 , 196, 197, 198/ 5k, 1989, 224, 226, 231 , 221, 220, 211 , western boundary of plot number 210 and meets at point 'J' on the common boundary of villages Ralia -Bhilaibazar .

J-K

Line passes along common boundary ofvillages Ralia- Bhilaibazar and meets at point ' K'.

K-L Line passes along common boundary of villages Pondi-Bhilaibazar and meets at point' L' .

L-M Linepasses along common boundary of villages Pondi -Bahanpath and meets at point 'M' .

M-N Line passes along northern boundary of plot number 77, 79/1 , 83 , 84, 288,286, 280/4 , 303/2 , 311/1 , 311/2 , 311/3 , 337, 338/1 , 338/3 , 339, 340 and meets at point 'N' on the common boundary of villages Bhathora -Bahanpath.

N-O Line passes along common boundary ofvillage Bhathora-Bhilaibazar and meets at point ' O ' O-P -Q Line passes in village Bhathora along western boundary of plot number 153/2 , northern boundary of plot number 153/2 , 153/1 , western boundary of plot number 156 , 157, 1-16 and meets at point 'Q' .

Q-R Line passes in village Bhathora through plot number 1 16,261 , 260/2,260 /1 , 259/ 7kh , 272, 276 northern boundary of plot number 275 through plotnumber 272/2,289 , 375, 378 , 393, 394, 414. and meets at point 'R' .

R-S-T Line passes in village Bhathora through plot number414,413,402,403,404, 407, 406/1 , 406/2 , 359,354,349,347 , 348, point ' S' , 350-351,352,353 northern boundary of plot number 433 , 434 through plotnumber 438, 443, 444,466,467,469, 470 and meets at point ' T' on the common boundary ofvillage Bhilaibazar - Bhathora .

T-U Line passes along common boundary ofvillages Bhilaibazar-Bhathora and meets at point 'U' .

U-V Line passes in village Bhilaibazar along the southern boundary of plot number 272, through plot number 266 , eastern boundary of plot number 240, 241 then southemboundary ofplot number 241 , 242 , 247/1 , 247/2 , 248/2 , eastern boundary of plot number 220/1 , 221 , 222, then southern boundary of plot number 222 , eastern boundary of plot number 206 , 203 , southern boundary of plot number 203 , 202 , eastern boundary of plot number 195/6 , 195/3 southern boundary of plot number 195/3 , 195/4 , eastern boundary ofplot number 373/3 , 373/4 , southern boundary of plot number 114/1 , 114/6 , 114/5 , 144/4 113 , 110, eastern and southern boundary ofplot number 109 , eastern boundary of plot number 80 , 81 , southern boundary of plot number 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , eastern boundary of plot number 68/9 , 68/5 and meets at point 'V ' on the common boundary of villages Bhilaibazar- Mudiyanar.

V-W Line passes along the common boundary of villages Bhilaibazar - Mudiyanar and meets at point'W'..

W-X-Y Line passes along the common boundary of villages Bhilaibazar- Ralia , point X and meetsat `point 'Y' .

Y-YI Line passes in village Ralia along southern boundary of plot number 210/4 , 213 , 212 , through plot number 233 , 231 then southern boundary ofplot number 226 , 225 , through plot number 198 then southern boundary of plot number 198/5 gh , 194, 38/2 , 38/6 , through plot number 38/1 , southern boundary of plot number 35, 36, through plot number 34, 33 , 32, 16 then southern boundary of plot number 18 after that through plot number 16 and meets at point ' Y I ' on the common boundary of villages Ralia Amgaon.

YI -Z Line passes along common boundary of villages Saraisingar-Amgaon and meet at point 'Z' .

Z-A Line passes in village Amgaon along western boundary ofplot number 616,617/1,617/2,454/ 1,605,604/2 , 601/3,600-601/2 , 598 /2,598 / 1 then along northern boundary of plot number 598/1 and meets at starting point 'A'

[F. No. 43015/ 9/2007 - PRIW - 11 M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy .

5876

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] नई दिल्ली , 29 सितम्बर , 2009

कोस्वयं सुने जाने , विधि व्यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपत्तियों को सुनने के पश्चात् और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जांच , यदि कोई हो , करने के पश्चात्, जो वह आवश्यक समझता है , वह या तो धारा 7 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि का या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़े या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आपत्तियों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार को उसके विनिश्चय के लिए देगा ।

का.आ. 2705,-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार में कोयला मंत्रालय के द्वारा जारी की गई अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 273 तारीख 29 जनवरी , 2009 जो भारत के राजपत्र भाग II, खण्ड 3 , उप- खण्ड ( ii ) , तांरीख 7फरवरी , 2009 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका माप 292.00 हेक्टर (लगभग ) या 721.532 एकड़ ( लगभग ) है , कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी;

(3 ) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबद्ध समझा जाएगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होगा , यदि भूमि या किसी ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर लिए जाते हैं " ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना में संलग्न अनुसूची में कोयला अभिप्राप्त है ;

अतः केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास) अधिनियम , 1957 की धारा 7 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 291.285 हेक्टर (लगभने) या 719.77 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप की उक्त भूमि का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है;

टिप्पण 3 : केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता-700001 को उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 के अधीन भारत के राजपत्र भाग II , खण्ड 3 , उप-खण्ड (ii ) में 4 अप्रैल , 1987 में प्रकाशित अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 905 , तारीख 20 मार्च , 1987 द्वारा सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियुक्त किया है ।

अनुसूची

पोंड़ी ब्लॉक दूसरा विस्तार , गेवरा क्षेत्र

जिला कोरबा ( छत्तीसगढ़ )

(रेखांक संख्या एसईसीएल/बीएसपी/जीएम ( पीएलजी ) /भूमि/348 तारीख 4 जुलाई , 2009 )

टिप्पण 1 : इस अधिसूचना के अधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. एसईसीएल/बी.एस.पी./जी.एम. ( पीएलजी )/लैंड/348 तारीख 4-7-2009 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर , जिला कोरबा (छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता-700001 के कार्यालय में या साउथ ईस्टर्न कोल फील्ड्स लिमिटेड , ( राजस्व अनुभाग ) सीपत रोड , बिलासपुर-495001 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

सभी अधिकार : -

(क ) राजस्व भूमि:

क्षेत्र टिप्पण

क्रम ग्राम का

पटवारी खेवट तहसील जिला

सं. नाम

हेक्टर

हल्का संख्या

टिप्पण 2 : कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) , अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है , जिसमें निम्नलिखित उपबंध है;

में .

संख्या

अर्जन के बाबत् आपत्तियाँ:

20 29

कोरबा 39.992 भाग

दिपका

1. भठोरा

2. नरईबोध 20 90 दिपका कोरबा 201.091 भाग

कुल क्षेत्र : 241.083 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 595.72 एकड़ ( लगभग )

(ख ) राजस्व वन भूमि

" 8 ( 1 ) कोई व्यक्ति जो किसी भूमि में जिसकी बाबत् धारा 7(1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचना निकाली गई है , हितबद्ध है , अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्हीं अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के बारे में आपत्ति कर सकेगा ।

पटवारी खेवट तहसील जिला क्षेत्र टिप्पण

क्रम ग्राम का

स्पष्टीकरण: -

हेक्टर

हल्का संख्या

सं नाम

में

संख्या

दिपका कोरबा 50.202 भाग

1 . नरईबोध 20 90

( 1 ) इस धारा के अन्तर्गत यह आपत्ति नहीं मानी जाएगी कि कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन संक्रियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संक्रियाएं केन्द्रीय सरकार या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नहीं करनी चाहिए ।

कुल क्षेत्र : 50.202 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 124.05 एकड़ ( लगभग )

कुल योग ( क + ख ) :- 291.285 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) (2) उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन प्रत्येक आपत्ति सक्षम अधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जाएगी और सक्षम अधिकारी , आपत्तिकर्ता

या 719.77 एकड़ ( लगभग) 5877 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3, 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

1. ग्राम भठोरा ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट

संख्या: 1, 2 ( भाग ) , 3( भाग ) , 9 ( भाग ) , 11 ( भाग ) , 12 से 21 , 22/1 ( भाग ), 22/2 ( भाग ) , 23 ( भाग ) , 24 ( भाग) , 25, 26 ( भाग ) ) , 27 (भाग ) , 29 ( भाग ), 30, 31 , 32, 33 ( भाग ), 34 ( भाग), 40 ( भाग), 116 ( भाग ) , 259 ( भाग ), 260 ( भाग ), 261 ( भाग ) , 262/1 , 262/2 , 262/3क, 262/3ख, 262/4 से 262/11 , 263/1 से 263/7, 264 से 267, 268/1 से 268/7 , 268/8क, 268/8ख, 268/9, 269, 270/1 से 270/7, 271,272 ( भाग ), 276 ( भाग) , 277 ( भाग ), 289, 290/1 , 290/2, 291 से 295,296/ 1 क, 296/ 1 ख, 296/ 1 ग, 296/ 1 घ, 296/2, 297/1 , 297/2 , 298/1 , 298/2 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302 , 303 , 304/1 , 304/2 , 305 ( भाग ) , 349 ( भाग) , 350, 351 , 352( भाग ) , 353 ( भाग) , 354 ( भाग ) , 359 ( भाग ), 375 ( भाग ) , 378 ( भाग ) , 379 से 382, 383/1 , 383/2 , 384/1 से 384/3 , 385/1 से 385/3 , 386, 387, 388/1 से 388/4 , 389/1 से 389/5, 390 से 392, 393 ( भाग ) , 394 ( भाग ) , 402 (भाग) , 403 ( भाग ) , 404( भाग ) , 406 ( भाग ) , 407 ( भाग ) , 408, 409/1 से 409/3 , 410/1 से 410/3 , 411 , 412 ( भाग ) , 413 (भाग) , 414 ( भाग) , 415, 416/ 1,416/2 , 417, 418/ 1,418/2 , 419 , 420/1 , 420/2 , 421/1 से 421/3 , 422/1 , 422/2, 423 से 431, 432 ( भाग ), 437 ( भाग ), 438 ( भाग ), 443 ( भाग ) , 444 (भाग ) , 445,446/1,446/2,447/1 से 447/3 , 448 , 449/1,449/2 , 450, 451/1, 451/2, 452 से 457,458/1,458/2,459 , 460/1 , 460/2 , 461/1 , 461/2, 461/3, 462 से 465, 466 ( भाग ), 467 ( भाग ), 468, 469 (भाग ) , 470 (भाग ) .

2. भाग नरईबोध ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले

124/2ख/2, 124/2ख/3 , 124/25/1 , 124/21/2 , 124/25/3 , 124/28/1 से 124/28/7, 124/25/1 से 124/25/4, 125, 126, 127/1 से 127/17, 128/1से 128/3 , 129, 130/1 , 130/2, 131/1 से 131/9, 132, 133/1 से 133/4 , 134, 135/1 से 135/4, 136, 137/1 से 137/11 , 138 , 139/1 , 139/2 , 139/3 , 140/1 से 140/9, 141 , 142/1 , 142/2, 143/1 , 143/2, 143/3 , 144/1 से 144/8, 145/1 से 145/6, 146, 147 , 148/1 से 148/3 , 149 से 153 , 154/1 , 154/2, 155/1 , 155/2, 155/3 , 156, 157/1 , 157/2 , 157/3, 158, 159, 160 , 161/1 , 161/2 , 162/1 , 162/2, 163, 164/1 , 164/2, 165 , 166 , 167/1 , 167/2, 168 , 169/1 , 169/2 , 170/1 , 170/2 , 170/3 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174/1 , 174/2 , 175 , 176/1 , 176/5, 177, 178/1 से 178/4, 179, 180, 181/1 , 181/2, 182से 194, 195/1 से 195/7, 196/1 , 196/2, 197/1 से 197/6 , 198 , 199/1 से 199/4, 200/1 से 200/4, 201/1 से 201/3 , 202, 203, 204, 205/1 से 205/5, 206से 211 , 212/1 से 212/5 , 213, 214/1,214/2, 215 , 216, 217/1,217/2,218/1 , 218/2, 219/1 से 219/5 , 220/ 1,220/2, 220/ 3,221/1 से 221/17,222 , 223/ 1,223/2,224/ 1,224/2,225,226/ 1 से 226/18,227/ 1,227/2, 228 से 231 , 232/1 से 232/5,233, 234,235/ 1,235 /2,235 /3 , 236/1 से 236/7, 237/1 से 237/10,238/ 1 से 238/4, 239/1 से 239/4, 240/1 से 240/8,241/ 1,241/2,242/ 1 से 242/3 , 243/1 , 243/2 , 243/3 , 244/1 , 244/2,245/ 1,245/2, 246/1 से 246/8,247/ 1 से 247/7 , 248 , 249/1 से 249/5,250,251 , 252/ 1,252/2,252/3,253/ 1,253 /2,254/ 1,254/2,255/1,255/2, 255/3 , 256/ 1,256/2,256 /3,257/ 1,257/2,258,259,260/1,260/ 2,261 , 262/1,262/2 , 262/3 , 263, 264, 265, 266/1 , 266/2 , 267, 268, 269/1 , 269/2 , 269/3 , 270 , 271/1 , 271/2,271 /3,272/ 1से 272/4,273/1,273/2,274,275,276/ 1,276/2,277,278/ 1,278/2 , 279,280,281/ 1 , 281/2, 282 , 283/1 , 283/2, 283/3 , 284/1 से 284/ 4,285,286,287/ 1 से 287/5,288/ 1,288 /2,289,290/1,290/2 , 291/1 , 291/2, 292/1 से 292/5 , 293 , 294/1 , 294/2, 295/1 से 295/ 4,296/1 से 296/11 , 297/1 से 297/4, 298/1 से 298/5, 299/1 , 299/2, 300/ 1,300/2 , 300/3 , 301/1 , 301/2, 301/3, 302 से 305, 306/1 , 306/2, 307, 308/1 , 308/2, 309/1 से 309/7, 310/1 , 310/2 , 311 , 312/1 से 312/6,313 /1 से 313/7,314/1 से 314/4, 315/1 से 315/7,316,317/1 से 317/6,318,319, 320, 321/1 से 321/7,322, 323/1 से 323/4, 324/1 से 324/9, 325/1 से 325/4, 326/1 , 326/2, 326/3,327/1,327/2 , 328 , 329/1 , 329/2 , 330/ 1,330/2 , 330/3 , 331 से 333 , 334/1 से 334/5 , 335/1 , 335/2 , 336, 337/1 से 337/5 , 338/1 से 338/5,339 से 342,343/1,343/2,343/3,344, 345/1 , 345/2, 346/1 , 346/2 , 347/1 , 347/2, 348 से 350, 351/1 से 351/7, 352/1 , 352/2, 353/1 से 353/4, 354/1 , 354/2 , 355/1 , 355 /2,356,357/ 1 से 357/4, 358, 359, 360/1 से 360/4, 361/1, 361/2, 362 से 367, 368/1 , 368/ 2,369 , 370/1 से 370/6,371 , 372/1,372/2,373,374,375,376/1,376/2,376/3,377,378,379 , 380/1,380/2,381,382/ 1 से 382/4 , 383/1 , 383/2,384से 388 , 389/1 , 389/2, 390, 391 , 392 , 393/1 , 393/2, 393/3 , 394, 395, प्लाट संख्या: -1/1 1/25, 2/1 से 2/4, 3/1 से 3/6, 4/1 से 4/5, 5/ 1 5/2 , 6/1 से 6/ 5,7/1 से 7/3 , 8 , 9/1 से 9/7, 10/1 , 10/2, 10/3 , 11 / 1 से 11/10, 12, 1371 ( भाग .), 13/2 से 13/14 , 14/1 , 15/1 ( भाग ) , 16/1 से 16/ 10.17/ 1 से 17/7 , 18/1 , 18/2, 19/1,19/2, 19/3 , 20/1से 20/4, 21 , 22/1 से 22/12, 23/1 , 23/2, 24/1 , 24/2 , 25/1 से 25/5, 26/1 से 26/4 , 27 , 28 , 29/1 , 29/2 , 30 , 31/1 से 31/11 , 32/1 से 32/4.32/ 5क, 32 /5 ख, 32/6, 33 से 38, 39/1 , 39/2 , 39/3 , 40/1 से 40/4, 41/1 से 41/6, 42/1 से 42/5 , 43/1 से 43/3 , 44/1 , 44/2, 45/1,45/2,46,47/1,47/2,48,49,50,51,52/ 1,52/2,53/ 1 , 53/2 , 54/1 से 54/5 , 55/1 , 55/2 , 56/1 , 56/2 , 57 से 62, 63/1 , 63/2, 64से 71.72/ 1 , 72/2, 73/1 , 73/2 , 74, 75, 76, 77/1 से 77/4, 78/1 से 78/19, 79/1 , 79/2, 80/1 से 80/4, 81/1 , 81/2, 82/1 , 82/2, 83से 88 , 89/1 से 89/5, 90, 91 , 92/1 , 92/2 , 93 , 94/1 , 94/2, 94/3,95/ 1 , 95/2, 96, 97, 98/1 , 98/2 , 99/1 , 99/2 , 100/1 से 100/23 , 101/1 से 101/5 , 102/1 , 102/2 , 103/1 , 103/2 , 103/3 , 104/1 से 104/6, 105/1 से 105/5, 106/1 से 106/5, 107/1 , 107/2, 108/1 , 108/2, 109/1 से 109/5, 110/1 से 110/6, 111/1 से 111/3 , 112/1 से 112/4, 113 , 114/1 से 114/12 , 115 , 116/1 से 116/10, 117/1 से 117/5, 118/1 से 118/6 , 119/1 , 119/2 , 119/3 , 120/1से 120/8 , 121/1 , 121/2 , 122/1 से 122/4 , 123/1 से 123/7 , 124/ 1 क, 124/ 1 ख, 124/ 1 ग, 124/ 1 घ, 124/2क/ 1 , 124/2/2, 124/2/3 , 124/2ख/ 1 , 5878

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ASVINA 11 , 1931

च-छ-ज रेखा ग्राम मनगांव नरईबोध , गेवरा-नरईबोध के भागतः सम्मिलित सीमा तथा बिन्दु "छ " से गुजस्ती हुई बिन्दु "ज" पर मिलती है ।

ज-झ-ज-ट रेखा ग्राम नरईबोध- गेवरा , नरईबोध- पंडरीपानी , नरईबोध -बरभाटा के सम्मिलित सीमा तथा बिन्दु "झा" बिन्दु "ज" से होती हुई ग्राम नरईबोध - बरभाटा के सम्मिलित सीमा में बिन्दु " ट " पर मिलती है ।

ट-ठ रेखा ग्राम भठोरा के प्लाट संख्या 470 के दक्षिणी सीमा तथा प्लाट संख्या 468, 467,466,444/3 , 443/1 , 438/2, 441 , 438/1 से गुजरती है फिर प्लाट संख्या 432-437/2 के दक्षिणी सीमा तथा प्लाट संख्या 353,350-351-352 से होती हुई बिन्दु "ठ" पर मिलती है ।

ठ-ड रेखा ग्राम भठोरा के प्लाट संख्या 347-348 के पूर्वी . सीमा तथा प्लाट संख्या 349 , 354, 359, 406/2 406/1 , 407, 404, 403 , 402 , 413 , 414 से गुजरती बिन्दु "ड" पर मिलती है ।

ड-ढ रेखा ग्राम भठोरा के प्लाट संख्या 414 , 394 , 393 , 378/1, 378/2 , 375 , 374 , 289/1 , -305 , 277/2 , 276, 272, 259/7 ख, 260/2, 261 , 22/1 , 23-24-25 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 33/2 , 34/2 , 9 , 11 , 2/5 2/7 से होती हुई ग्राम कोसमंडा भठोरा के सम्मिलित सीमा में बिन्दु "ढ " पर मिलती है ।

ढ- ण -त रेखा ग्राम कोसमंडा भठोरा के सम्मिलित सीमा तथा बिन्दु "ण " से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु "त " पर मिलती है ।

त-क रेखा ग्राम कोसमंडा नरईबोध के सम्मिलित सीमां से गुजरती हुई आरंभिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है ।

[फा. सं. 43015/25/2008- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]

एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव 396/1 से 396/8 , 397/1 , 397/2 , 398/1 , 398/2, 399/1 से 399/5, 400/1,400/2 ,400/3, 401/1 से 401/11 , 402/1 , 402/2, 403 ,404/1 से404/4, 405,406, 407, 408/1 से 408/5 , 409/1 , 409/2 , 409/3 , 410,411/ 1 , 411/2,412/ 1 , 412/2 , 412/3 , 413/1 , 413/2 , 414/1 से 414/13 , 415/1 से 415/ 11,416/ 1 , 416/2 , 417/1 , 417/2 , 418/1 से 418/18,419/1 से 419/5 , 420, 421 , 422/1 से 422/3, 422/4क, 422/4ख, 422/5 से 422/41 , 422/42 क, 422/42 ख, 422/43,422/44, 423/1 से 423/5, 424, 425/1 से 425/10, 426/1 से 426/14, 427, 428, 429/1 , 429/2, 429/3 , 430/1 से 430/45, 431/1 से 431/5, 432/1 , 432/2 , 433/1,433/2, 434/1 से 434/4, 435/1 से 435/7 , 436/1 से 436/9,437/1 से 437/3, 438/1 से 438/5 , 439/1 , 439/2क, 439/ 2 ख, 439/3 से 439/5 , 440/1 से 440/4, 441/1 से 441/4,442/1,442/2 , 442/3 , 443/1 से 443/6.444/1 से 444/11 , 445/1 से 445/5.446/ 1 से 446/5, 447/1 से 447/5 , 448/1 , 448/2 , 449/1 से 449/6,450,451 / 1,451/2 , 452, 453 , 454/1,454/2क. 454/2ख, 454/3: 454/4, 454/5 क, 454/5 ख, 454/5ग, 455/1 से 455/4,455/5क, 455/5 ख, 455/6 , 456/1 , 456/2, 457/1 से 457/6, 458/1.458/2.458′3 . 459/1 से 459/6, 460,461/1 से 461/4, 462/1,462/2,462/3.463/ 1.463/2 , 464/1,464/2,465,466/ 1 से 466/12,467/1.467/2.467/3 , 468/1 से 468/4 , 469/1 से 469/5 , 470/1,470 /2.471 1.471/2.471/3.472/ 1 से 472/4.473.474/ 1 से 474/4,475 1 से 475/8,476,477,478,479/1 से 479/6, 480/1 . 480/2,481,482,483′1 से 483/7,484,485/ 1,485/2,486,487. 488/ 1,488/2.489/ 1 से 489/6 , 490 से 497, 498/1 से 498/6 , 499 / 1 से499/4,500′1 से 500/6 , 5011 से 501/4, 502/1 से502/6.503. 504/1 से 504:6.5051.505 /2, 506/1 से 506/5,507 1,507/2,508 /1 . 508 2.508 3.509 1 से 509 5.510/1 से 510/4.511 / 1.511/2.512/ 1.5122,513,5141 से5144,515/1.515/2,515/3.516′1 से516/8.517/ 1.5172.5173.517 4 क 5174 ख 517/47.518/1,5182.519/1 से519 5,520,521.522 1 से 522/4,523,524.525/ 1,5252.526/ 1,526/2,527 1.5272.528 1.528 2,529,530,531 / 1,531/2,531 /3.532.533/ 1 से 5337.

New Delhi , the 29th September 2009 सीमा वर्णन :

क-ख रेखा बिन्दु " क " से आरंभ होती है और ग्राम मनगांव- नरईबांध के सम्मिलित सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " ख " पर मिलती है ।

ख-ग-घ रेखा ग्राम नरईबोध के प्लाट संख्या 3/1 तथा बिन्दु " ग " से होती हुई बिन्दु "घ " पर मिलती है ।

S.O. 2705. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 273 dated the 29th January, 2009 issued under sub- section (1) of Section -4 of the Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 (20 or 1957 ) ( herelnafter referred to as the said Act ) and published in the Gazette of India , Part - 11 , Section 3 , sub- section ( ii ) dated the 7th February , 2009 , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 292.00 hectares (approximately) or 721.532 acres (approximately) ofthe lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification:

घ-ड -च रेखा ग्राम नरईबोध के प्लाट संख्या 13/3 के दक्षिणी, प्लाट संख्या 13/6 के उत्तरी सीमा , बिन्दु " ड. " से गुजरती है फिर प्लाट संख्या 8/1 क , 15 से. होती हुई ग्राम नरईबोध मनगांव के सम्मिलित सीमा में बिन्दु "च" पर मिलती है ।

And whereas , the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands prescribed in the Schedule appended to this notification;

5879 [ भाग 1]- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3, 2009/ आश्विन 11 , 1931

undertake mining operation in the land for the production of coal and that such operation should not be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person .

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act, 1957, the Central . Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the land measuring 291.285 hectares ( approximately) or 719,77 acres ( approximately) as All Rights in or over the said lands described in the Schedule appended hereto:

Note 1. The plan bearing number SECL/ BSP / GM ( PLG )/ LAND/348 dated the 04-07-2009 ofthe area covered bythisnotification may be inspected in the office oftheCollector, Korba ( Chhattisgarh) or in the office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata-700001 or in the office ofthe South Eastern . Coalfields Limited ( Revenue Section), Seepat Road, Bilaspur-496006 (Chhattisgarh) .

(2) Every objection under sub-section ( 1 ) shall be made to the competent authority in writing , and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity ofbeing heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall , after hearing all such objections a after making such further inquiry, if any, as he thinks necessary, either makes a report in respect ofthe land which has been notified under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 7 or of rights in or over such land, or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land , tothe CentralGovernment containing his recommendations on theobjections , together with the record of the proceedings held by hiin, for the decision of that Governinent .

Note 2.Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of Section 8 of the said Act which provides as follows:-

Objection toAcquisition:

(3) For the purposes of this section , a person shall bedeemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act. " "8( 1) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under section 7( 1 ) has been issued , may, within thirty days of the issue of the notification , object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or any rights in or over such land .

Explanation,-

Note 3. The Coal Controller, 1. Council House Street , Kolkata , 700001 , has been appointed by the Central Government as the competent authority under section 3 of the said Act , vide notification number S.O. 905 , dated the 20th March, 1987 , published in part 11 , Section 3 , sub- section (ii ) of the Gazette of India, dated the 4th April 1987.

(1) It shall not be an objection within the meaning of thissection for any person to say that he himself desires to

SCHEDULE

Pondi Block 2nd Expension, Gevra Area

District Korba(Chhattisgarh)

(Planbearing number SECL/BSP/GM ( PLG )/Land/348 dated the 4th July, 2009)

All Rights

(A) Revenue Land

SINo.

Tehsil District

Remarks

Khewat Number

Areain Heatares

Patwari halka Number

Name of village

Bhathora

Korba 39.992

Part

Dipka

Naraiboth

Korba

Part

201.091

Dipka

Total:-241.083 Hectares (approximately) or 595.72 Acres (approximately)

(B) Revenue Forest Land (CJJ & BJJ )

Remarks

Tehsil District

SI No.

Khewat Number

Areain Heatares

Patwari halka Number

Name of village

1 .

50.202

Part 20

Naraiboth

Korba

Dipka

Total:-50.202 Hectares (approximately) or 124.05 Acres (approximately)

Grand Total (A+B) :- 291.285 Hectares ( approximately)

or 719.77 Acres (approximately)

5880

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3, 2009 /ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] 1. Plot Numbers to be acquired in village Bhathor ( Part): -

1 , 2 ( P ) , 3 ( P ) , 9 (P ) , 11 ( P ) , 12से 21 , 22/1 (P) , 22/2 ( P ), 23 ( P ) , 24 ( P ), 25, 26 (P ) ), 27 ( P ) , 29 ( P ), 30, 31 , 32, 33 ( P ) , 34 ( P) , 40 ( P ) , 1-16 ( P ) , 259 ( P ), 260 ( P ), 261 ( P) , 262/ 1,262/2, 262/3k, 262/3kh , 262/4 to 262/11 , 263/1 to 263/7, 264 to 267,268 / 1 to 268/7, 268/ 8k, 268/ 8kh , 268/9 , 269, 270/1 to 270/7 , 271 , 272 ( P ) , 276 ( P ) , 277 ( P) , 289, 290/ 1,290/2 , 291 to 295 , 296/k, 296/ 1kh , 296/ 1g , 296/1gh 296/2,297/ 1,297/2, 298/1 , 298/2,299 , 300, 301 , 302, 303,304/ 1 , 304/2, 305 ( P) , 349 ( P ) , 350, 351 , 352 ( P) , 353 ( P) , 354 (P); 359 ( P) , 375 ( P ) , 378 ( P) , 379 to 382, 383/ 1,383/2, 384/1to 384/3,385/ 1 to 385/3,386,387, 388/1 to 388/4,389/ 1 to 389/5 , 390 to 392, 393 ( P ) , 394 ( P ) , 402 ( P ) , 403 ( P ) , 404(P),406 (P ) , 407 ( P ) , 408 , 409/1 to 409/3 , 410/1 to 410/ 3, 411 , 412 (P ), 413 ( P) , 414 ( P ), 415 , 416/1 , 416/2, 417, 418/1 , 418/2,419, 420/ 1,420/2 ,421/1 to 421/3 , 422/1 , 422/2 , 423to 431,432 ( P) , 437 ( P ) , 438 ( P ) , 443 ( P ) , 444 ( P) , 445,446/1,446/2, 447/1 to 447/3 ,448 , 449/1 , 449/2,450,451/ 1,451 /2, 452 to 457, 458/ 1,458/2 , 459, 460/1 , 460/2, 461/1 , 461/2,461/3, 462 to 465, 466 (P), 467 (P), 468, 469 ( P),470 (P) .

2. Plot Numbers to be acquired in village Naraiboth (Part):-

1 to 199/4, 200/1 to 200/4 , 201/1 , to201 /3 , 202, 203 , 204, 205/ 1 to 205/5 , 206 to 211 , 212/1 to 212/5 , 213 , 214/1,214/2.215 , 216,217/ 1,217/2,218 / 1 , 218 /2,219/ 1 to 219/5, 220/1 , 220/2 , 220/3 , 221/1 to 221/17 , 222 , 223/1,223 /2 , 224/ 1,224/2 , 225 , 226/1 to 226/18 , 227/1 , 227/2 , 228 to 231 , 232/1 to 232/5 , 233 , 234,235/1,235/2 , 235/3,236 / 1 to 236/7 , 237/1 to 237/10,238/ 1 to238 /4,239/ 1 to 239/4, 240/1 to 240/8 , 241/1 , 241 /2,242/ 1 to 242/3, 243/1 , 243/2, 243/3 , 244/1 , 244/2, 245/1 , 245/2,246/ 1to 246/8 , 247/1 to 247/7 , 248 , 249/1 to 249/5,250,251 , 252/ 1,252/2,252/3 , 253/ 1,253/2 , 254/ 1,254/2,255/ 1,255/2 , 255/3,256/1,256/2,256/3,257 / 1,257/2,258,259,260/1,260/ 2,261,262/ 1,262/2,262/3,263,264,265,266/ 1,266/2,267,268, 269/1, 269/2, 269/3 , 270, 271/1 271/2, 271/3 , 272/1 to 272/4, 273/1,273 /2,274,275,276/ 1,276/2,277 , 278/ 1,278/2,279, 280, 281 / 1,281 /2,282/ 1,282,283/1 , 283/2, 283/3 , 284/1 to 284/4,285,286,287/1 to 287/5 , 288 / 1,288/2,289,290/1,290/ 2,291/ 1 , 291/2 , 292/1 to 292/5,293,294/ 1,294/2,295 / 1 to 295/4, 296/1 to 296/11 , 297/1 to 297/4 , 298/1 to 298/5,299/1 , 299/2, 300/1 , 300/2 , 300/3 , 301/1 , 301/2 , 301/3 , 302 to 305, 306/1 , 306/2 , 307, 308/1 , 308/2,309/ 1 to 309/7, 310/1,310/2, 311 , 312/1 to 312/6 , 313/1 to 313/7, 314/1 to 314/4 , 315/1 to 315/7, 316, 317/1 to 317/6 , 318 , 319 , 320, 321/1 to 321 /7,322, 323/1 to 323/4, 324/1 to 324/9 , 325/1 to 325/4 , 326/1 , 326/2 , 326/3,327/ 1,327/2, 328 , 329/1 , 329/2,330/ 1,330/2,330/3,331 to333, 334/1 to 334/5, 335/1 , 335/2, 336, 337/1 to 337/5 , 338/ 1 to 338/5, 339 to 342, 343/1 , 343/2, 343/3 , 344,345/1 , 345/2 , 346/1 , 346/2 , 347/1 , 347/2 , 348 to 350, 351/1 to 351 /7,352/ 1 , 352/2 , 353/1 to 353/4, 354/1 , 354/2, 355/ 1,355/2,356,357/1 to 357/4, 358 , 359 , 360/1 to 360/4, 361/1 , 361/2 , 362 to 367, 368/ 1,368/2, 369 , 370/1 to 370/6 , 371,372/ 1 , 372/2 , 373 , 374, 375,376/1,376/2,376/3,377,378, 379 , 380/1 , 380/2,381,382/ I to 382/4 , 383/ 1,383/2, 384 to 388, 389/1 , 389/2 , 390,391 , 392, 393/1,393/2, 393/3, 394, 395 , 396/1 to 396/8, 397/1 , 397/ 2, 398/1 , 398/2 , 399/1 to 399/5 , 400/1,400/2, 400/3 , 401/1 to 401/11 , 402/1 , 402/2 , 403 , 404/1 , to404/4, 405 , 406,407, 408/ I to 408/5 ,409/1 , 409/2, 409 /3,410,411/ 1,411 /2, 412/ 1,412/2, 412/3, 413/1 , 413/2, 414/1 to 414/13 , 415/1 to 415/11 , 416/ 1,416/2, 417/1 , 417/2 , 418/1 to 418/18, 419/1 to 419/5 , 420 , 421, 422/1 to 422/3 , 422/4 k, 422/4kh , 422/5 to 422/41 , 422/ 42k, 422/42kh , 422/43 , 422/44, 423/1 to 423/5 , 424, 425/1 to 425/10, 426/1 to 426/14, 427, 428 , 429/1 , 429/2, 429/3, 430/1 to 430/45, 431/1 to 431/5 , 432/1 , 432/2, 433/1 , 433/2, 434/1 to 434/4, 435/1 to 435/7 , 436/1 to 436/9, 437/1 to 437/3 , 438/1 to 438/5, 439/1, 439/2k, 439 /2kh , 439/3 to 439/5, 440/1 to440/4, 441/1 to 441/4, 442/1 , 442/2 ,442/3 , 443/1 to 443/6, 444/1 to 444/11 , 445/1 to 445/5 , 446/1 to 446/5, 447/1 to 447/5,448/1 , 448/2, 449/1 to449/6, 450, 451/1 , 451/2, 452, 453, 454/1 ,454/ 2k, 454/2kh , 454/3 , 454/4, 4545k, 454/5kh , 454/5g , 455/1 to 455/4, 455 /5k, 455/5kh , 455/6, 456/1 , 456/2, 457/1 to 457/6, 458/1,458/2,458/3 , 459/1 to 459/6, 460 , 461/1 to 461/4,462/ 1,462/2, 462/3, 463/1 , 463/2, 464/1 , 464/2, 465, 466/1 to466/ 12,467/1 , 467/2 , 467/3 , 468/1 to 468/4, 469/1 to 469/5,470/ 1 , 470/2,471 /1,471/2, 471/3 , 472/1 to 472/4, 473 , 474/1 to474/ 4,475/1 to 475/8, 476,477,478,479/ 1 to 479/6, 480/ 1,480/2, 1/1 to 1/25 , 2/1 to 2/4, 3/1 to 3/6, 4/1 to 4/5 , 5/1 , 5/2 , 6/1 to 6/5, 7/1 to 7/3 , 8, 9/1 to 9/7 , 10/1 , 10/2 , 10/3 , 11/1 to 11/10, 12, 13, 1 (P) 13/2 to 13/14, 14/1 , 15/1 (P) 16/1 to 16/10, 17/1 to 17/ 7 , 18/1 , 18/2 , 19/1 , 19/2 , 19/3 , 20/1 to 20/4 , 21 , 22/1 to 22/12, 23/1, 23/2, 24/1 , 24/2 , 25/1 to 25/5, 26/1 to 26/4, 27, 28, 29/1 , 29/2 30, 31/1 to 31/11 , 32/1 to 32/4, 32/ 5k, 32/5kh , 32/6, 33 to 38 , 39/1 , 39/2 , 39/3 , 40/1 to 40/4 , 41/1 to 41/6 , 42/1 to 42/5 , 43/1 to43/3 , 44/1 , 44/2, 45/1,45/2,46, 47/1,47/2, 48, 49, 50 , 51 , 52/1 , 52/2, 53/1 , 53/2 , 54/ 1to 54/5 , 55/1 , 55/2, 56/1 , 56/2,57, to 62, 63/1 , 63/2, 64 to 71 , 72/1 , 72/2, 73/1 , 73/2, 74, 75, 76, 77/1 to 77/4 , 78/1 to 78/19 , 79/1 , 79/2 , 80/1 to 80/4 , 8:1/1 , 81/2, 82/1 , 82/2, 83 to 88 , 89/1 to 89/5 , 9091 , 92/1 , 92/2, 93, 94/ 1,94/2,94/3,95/1 , 95/2, 96, 97, 98/1 , 98/2, 99/1 , 99/2100/1 to 100/23 , 101/1 to 101/5102/1 , 102/2 , 103/1 , 103/2, 103/3 , 104/ 1 to 104/6, 105/1 to 105/5 , 106/1 to 106/5 , 107/1 , 107/2, 108/ 1,108 /2, 109/1 to 109/5 , 110/1 to 110/6 , 111/1 to 111/3 , 112/ 1 to 112/4 , 113 , 114/1 to 114/12, 115, 116/1 , 116/10 , 117/1 to 117/5 , 118/1 to 118/6, 119/1 , 119/2, 119/3 , 120/1 to 120/8 , 121 / 1, 121/2, 122/1 to 122/4 to 123/1 to 123/7, 124/1k, 124/ 1kh , 124/1g, 124/1gh, 124/2k/ 1 124 /2k/2, 124/ 1k/3 , 124/2kh / 1 , 124/ 2kh/2, 124/2kh/3 , 124/2g/ 1 , 124/2g/2 , 124/2g/3 , 124/2gh/ 1 to 124/2gh/ 7, 124/2anga/ 1 to 124/2 anga/4, 125, 126 , 127/1 to 127/17, 128/1 to 128/3 , 129 , 130/1 , 130/2 , 131 /1to 131/9, 132, 133/1 to 133/4 , 134, 135/1 to 135/4 , 136, 137/1 to 137/ 11 , 138 , 139/1 , 139/2, 139/3 , 140/1 to 140/9 , 141 , 142/1 142/2, 143/1 , 143/2, 143/3 , 144/1 to 144/8, 145/1 to 145/6 , 146 , 147, 148/1 to 148/3 , 149 to 153 , 154/1 , 154/2, 155/1 , 155/2, 155/3, 156, 157/1 , 157/2 , 157/3 , 158 , 159, 160, 161/1 , 161/2, 162/1 , 162/2, 163, 164/1 , 164/2, 165 , 166, 167/1 , 167/2, 168, 169/1 , 169/2, 170/1 , 170/2 , 170/3 , 171 , 172, 173 , 174/1 , 174/2, 175, 176/2 to 176/5 , 177 , 178/1 to 178/4, 179, 180, 181/1 , 181/2, 182 to 194, 195/1 to 195/7 , 196/1 , 196/2, 197/1 to 197/6, 198, 199/ 5881

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

481,482, 483/1 to 483/7,484,485/ 1 , 485/2 , 486 ,487 ,488/1 , 488/2, 489/1 to489/6, 490 to 497, 498/1 to 498/6, 499/1 to 499/4, 500/1 to 500/6, 501/1 to 501/4, 502/1 to 502/6, 503, 504/1 to 504/6 , 505/1 , 505/2 , 506/1 to 506/5 , 507/1 , 507/2 , 508/1,508/2,508/3, 509/1 to 509/5 , 5 10/1 to 510/4, 511 /1,511/ 2,512/1,512/2,513, 514/1 to 514/4, 515/1 , 515/2, 515/3,516/ 1 to 516/8 , 517/1 , 517/2, 517/3 , 517 /4k, 517 /4kh 517/4g, 518/ 1,518/2, 519/1 to 519/5 , 520 , 521 , 522/1 to 522/4 , 523,524, 525/1, 525/2, 526/1 , 526/2, 527/1 , 527/2, 528/1 , 528/2, 529,530, 531/1 , 531/2, 531/3 , 532 , 533/1 to 533/7 .

Boundary Description:

A-B Line starts from point ' A ' and passes along com- mon boundary of villages Mangaon -Naraibodh and meets at point ' B' .

B-C-D Line passes in village Naraibodh through plot number 3/1 , point ' C ' and meets at point ' D' .

D-E-F Line passes in village Naraibodh along eastern and southern boundary of plot number 13/3 , northern boundary of plot number 13/6, point 'E' then through plot number 8 / 1K, 15 and meets atpoint ' F ' on the common boundary of village Naraibodh-Mangaon .

F-G-H Line passes along partly common boundary of villageMangaon -Naraibodh , Gevra -Naraibodh , point 'G' and meets at point 'H' .

H- I -J -K Line passes along common boundary ofvillages Naraibodh -Gevra , Naraibodh - Padaripani , Naraibodh-Barbhatha, point ' 1 ' & ' J ' and meets atpoint' K ' on the common boundary ofvillage Naraibodh -Barbhatha ,

K-L Line passes in village Bhathora along southern boundary ofplot number 470, through plot num- bers468, 467, 466, 444/3 , 443 /1,438 , 438/2,441 , 438/1 , southern boundary of plot numbesr 432, 437/2, through 353,350-351-352 and meets at point'L' .

L-M Line passes in village Bhathora along eastern boundary ofplot numbers 347-348, through 349, 354, 359,406/2,406/1 , 407,404, 403,402,413,414 andmeets at point 'M' .

M-N Line passes in village Bhathora through plot number 414,394,393,378/1,378/2,375,374, 289/ 1-305,277/2,276, 272, 259/ 7kh , 260/2,261,22/ 1 , 23-24-25,26,27 , 29, 33/2 , 34/2 , 9 , 11,2/5 , 2/7 and meets at point ' N' on the common boundary of villageKosmanda-Bhathora.

NOP Line passes along the partly common boundary of villages Kosmanda- Bhathora , point 'O' and meets at point 'P ' .

P-A Line passes along common boundary ofvillages Kosmanda-Naraibodh and meets at starting point'A'.

[F. No. 43015 /25/2008 - PRIW - 1 M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy.

आदेश

नई दिल्ली, 30 सितम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 2706.-कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 9 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1562 , तारीख 25 मई, 2009 , जो भारत के राजपत्र भाग 11 , खण्ड 3 , उप-खण्ड (ii ) , तारीख 6 जून , 2009 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, के प्रकाशन पर 'उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि या ऐसी भूमि (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त भूमि कहा गया है) में या उस पर के सभी अधिकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 10 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर , आत्यांतिक रूप से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित हो गए थे;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि साउथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड, सीपत रोड, बिलासपुर, छत्तीसगढ़ (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् सरकारी कम्पनी कहा गया है ) , ऐसे निबंधनों और शतों का जो केन्द्रीय सरकार इस निमित्त अधिरोपित करना उचित समझे, अनुपालन करने के लिये रजामंद है;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोथला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 11 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निदेश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में और उस पर इस प्रकार निहित सभी अधिकार, तारीख 6 जून , 2009 से केन्द्रीय सरकार में इस प्रकार निहित बने रहने के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित निबंधनों और शत्रों के अधीन रहते हुए , उक्त सरकारी कम्पनी में निहित हुए समझे जाएंगे , अर्थात्:-

( 1 ) उक्त सरकारी कम्पनी , उक्त अधिनियम के उपबंधों के अधीन यथा अवधारित प्रतिकर , ब्याज , नुकसानी और वैसी ही मदों की बाबत् किए गए सभी संदायों की प्रतिपूर्ति केन्द्रीय सरकार को करेगी;

(2) उक्त सरकारी कम्पनी द्वारा उपरोक्त शर्त ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को संदय स्कमों का अवधारण करने के प्रयोजन के लिये एक अधिकरण का गठन किया जाएगा और ऐसे किसी अधिकरण और ऐसे अधिकरण की सहायता करने के लिये नियुक्त व्यक्तिबों क संबंध में उपगत सभी व्यय, उक्त सरकारी कम्पनी द्वारा वहम किये जायेंगे और इसी प्रकार मिहित उक्त भूमि में या उस पर के उक्त अधिकार के लियेग्या उनसे अपील आदि सभी विधिक कार्यवाहियों की बाबत उपगत समीयमी, उक्त सरकारी कम्पनी द्वारा वहन किये जायेंगे :

5882

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (3) उक्त सरकारी कम्पनी , केन्द्रीय सरकार या उसके पदधारियों की, ऐसे किसी अन्य व्यय के संबंध में , क्षतिपूर्ति करेगी जो इस प्रकार निहितं उक्त भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के बारे में , केन्द्रीय सरकार या उसके पदधारियों द्वारा या उनके विरुद्ध किन्हीं कार्यवाहियों के संबंध में आवश्यक हो;

(3 ) उक्त सरकारी कम्पनी को , केन्द्रीय सरकार के पूर्व अनुमोदन के विमा , उक्त भूमि किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को अंतरित करने की शक्ति नहीं डोगी ; और

2. A Tribunal shall be constituted for the purpose of determining the amounts payable to the Central Government by the said Government Company under conditions ( 1 ) above and all expenditure incurred in connection with any such tribunal and persons appointed to assist such tribunal shall be borne by the said Government Company and similarly, all expenditure incurred inrespect of all legal proceedings like apeals etc. , for or in connection with the rights in or over the said lands, so vested , shall also be borne by the said Government Company;

( 5 ) उक्त सरकारी कम्पनी , ऐसे निदेशों और शतों का, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार द्वारा , जब कभी आवश्यक हो , उक्त भूमि के विशिष्ट क्षेत्रों के लिये दिए जाएं या अधिरोपित की जाए, पालन करेगी ।

[फा. सं. 43015/3/2006-पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]

3. The said Government Company shall indemnify theCentral Government or its officials against any other expenditure that may be necessary in connection with any proceedings by or against the Central Government or its officials regarding the rights in or over the said lands so vested;

एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव

ORDER

New Delhi , the 30th September, 2009

4. The said Government Company shall have no power to transfer the said lands and rights to any other persons without the prior approval of the Central Government ; and

5. The saidGovernment Company shall abide by such directionsand conditions as may be given or imposed by theCentral Government for particular areas of the said lands as and when necessary .

[F. No. 43015/3/2006- PRIW- 1 ]

M: SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy.

आदेश

नई दिल्ली , 30 सितम्बर , 2009

5.0. 2766. Whereas , on the publication of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number 3.0 . 1562 dated the 25th May, 2009 in the Gazette of India, Part II, Section 3 , sub - section ( ii ) dated the 6th June , 2009 issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 9 of the Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisition and Development ) Act. 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ), the lands and All Rights in and over such lands described in the Schedule appended to the said notification (hereinafter referred to as the said lands) vested absolutely in the Central Government free from ali encumbrances under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 10 of the said Acı:

And whereas , the Central Government is satisfied that the South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ( hereinafter referred to as the Government Company) is willingto comply with suchterms and conditions as the Central Government thinks fit to impose in this behalf;

का.आ. 2707.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार में कोयला मंत्रालय के द्वारा जारी की गई अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 2764, तारीख 29 सितम्बर , 2008 , जो भारत के राजपत्र भाग II , खण्ड 3 , उप- खण्ड (ii ) , तारीख 4 अक्तूबर, 2008 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका माप 416.02 हेक्टर (लगभग ) या 1016.02 एकड़ ( लगभग ) है;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त है;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 11 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act, 1957, (20 of 1957 ), the Central Government hereby directs that the said lands and the rights in and over the said lands so vested shall , instead ofcontinuingto vest in the Central Government be deemed to have been vasted in the said Government Company with effect from the 6th June , 2009 subject to the following terms and conditions , namely :-

1. The said Government Cornpany shall reimburse to the Central Government all payments made in respect of compensation , interest , damages and the like may be as determined under the provisions of the said Act:

अतः केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास) अधिनियम , 1957 की धारा 7 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उक्त भूमि का अर्जन करने की , अपने आशय की सूचना देती है । इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 410.96 हेक्टर (लगभग ) या 1015.52 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि में या उस पर के सभी अधिकार :-

5883 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

टिप्पण 1 : इस अधिसूचना के अधीन अपने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक संक्रियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी सक्रियाएं केन्द्रीय सरकार या किसी अभ्य व्यक्ति को नहीं करनी चाहिए ।

सं. सी. ( ई ) /जेआर/ 777-0309 , तारीख 7 मार्च , 2009 को जिला अधिकारी , चंद्रपुर के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , । , काउंसिल स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता-700001 के कार्यालय में या वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड, (राजस्व अनुभाग ) कोल ईस्टेट , सिविल लाईन्स, नागपुर -440-001 ( महाराष्ट्र ) के कार्यालय में किया जासकता है ।

टिप्पण 2 : कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) , अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है , जिसमें निम्नलिखित उपबंध है:-

(2 ) उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन प्रत्येक आपत्ति सक्षम अधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जाएगी और सक्षम अधिकारी , आपत्तिकर्ता को स्वयं सुने जाने , विभि व्यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपत्तियों को सुनने के पश्चात् और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जांच , यदि कोई हो, करने के पश्चात्, जो वह आवश्यक समझता है , वह या तो धारा 7 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि का या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़े या ऐसी भूधि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आपतियों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार को उसके विनिश्चय के लिए देगा ।

अर्जन की बाबत् आपत्तियाँ:

( 3 ) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए यह व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबद्ध समझा जाएगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होगा, यदि भूमि या किसी ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर लिए जाते है " ।

" 8 ( 1 ) कोई व्यक्ति जो किसी भूमि में , जिसकी बाबत् धारा 7 के अधीन अधिसूचना निकाली गई है , हितबद्ध है , अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिनों के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्हीं अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के बारे में आपत्ति कर सकेगा ।

स्पष्टीकरण:-

( 1 ) इस धारा के अन्तर्गत यह आपत्ति नहीं मानी जाएगी कि कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन

टिप्पण 3 : केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक , । , काउंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता-700 001 को उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 2519 तारीख 27 मई , 1983 जो भारत के राजपत्र भाग ।। , खण्ड 3 , उप- खण्ड (ii ) में ।। जून , 1983 द्वारा सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियुक्त किया है ।

अनुसूधी

दुर्गापुर डीप विस्तार ओपनकाच्ड अॉक

अंद्रपुर क्षेत्र

जिला अंद्रपुर ( महारष्ट्र )

समस्त अधिकार : -

रेखांक सं. सी -1- ( ई ) 111 /जेआर/ 777-0309 , तारीख 7 मार्च , 2009)

टिप्पणी क्रम संख्या

ग्राम का नाम

पटवारी सर्कल संख्या

आबादी

क्षेत्र हेक्टर में सरकारी

वन

तहसील एवं जिला

सिन्हाला

260.09

06.18 295.56 भाग

29.29

चंद्रपुर

59.20

चंद्रपुर डिवीजन कम्पार्टमेंट

चंद्रपुर

नंबर 400

115.40 পাল 401

54.26

चंद्रपुर आरक्षित

वन

402

01.94

चंद्रपुर चंद्रपुर

260.09

410.96 ( लगभग )

121.58

कुल:

642.71

29.29 72.37

हेक्टर में एकड़ में

(लगभग )

300.44 1015.52 5884

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 / ASVINA 11 , 1931

ग्राम सिन्हाला में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्याक:-

1. किरायेदारी/निजी भूमि:

2.8 /1.9/ 1 , 11/1 , 11/2, 12 , 13 , 14, 17/ 18.22/ 1,22/2 22/3,23,24,25,26/ 27, 28 , 30, 31 , 32, 33/1 , 33/2 , 35, 36 , 37/1.37/2.37/3 , 38 , 39/40, 113 , 114 , 115, 117 , 118, 119, 120, 121/4 , 121/2, 121/3 , 122, 123 , 124/1 , 124/2 , 125/1 , 125/2 , 126 , 127/1 , 127/2, 128/129, 130, 131 , 132, 133, 134, 135 , 136/1 , 136/2, 137/1.137/2 , 138 , 139 , 140/1 , 140/2, 141/1 , 141/2 , 142, 143/1,143/2,144, 145/1 , 145/2 , 145/3 , 145/4, 146 , 147 , 148 , 149, 150, 151 , 152, 152/2 , 152/3 , 152/4, 152/5 , 153, 154, 156, 157, 158, 159 , 160/1 , 160/2 , 160/3 , 160/4 , 161/1 , 161/2 , 162/ 1 ए. 162/1 बी. 162/2A, 162, 2 बी , 163/1 , 163/2, 164/1 , 164/2 , 165/1 ए . 165 / 1 बी , 165/2, 166/1 , 166/2 , 167/1 , 167/2 . 168.169/ 1,169/2, 169/3 , 170 , 171/1 , 171/2 , 172/1 , 172/2 . 173/1ए . 173/18 . 173/2ए . 173/28, 174, 175 , 176/ 1,176/2,177 、 178/ 1A- 178 / 13178 /2,179/1-179/2-179/3 , 180/1-180/2-180/ 3/181/1-181/2-181 /3.81/4-181/5/ 182/ 1-182/2-182/3-182 . 183, 184, 185 , 18/1-186/2, 187/1-187/2/ 188/1-188/2-188/ 3/ 189/ 1 ए-189/ 1 B. 189/2/190/191/1 , 191/2, 192/1-192/2 . 192/3, 193 , 194 , 195/1-195/ 1 ए-195/ 1 B- 195/2ए , 195/ 2 बी/ 196,197/1-197/2-197/3 , 198/ 199,200,201/ए -201/ बी-201/ सी 202/ 1-202/2,203, 204, 205/1-205/2-205/3-205/4/206/1- 206/2-206/3,206/4 , 206/5 , 206/6, 207, 208/1-208/2-208/3/ 209/1 , 209/2,209/3,210,211 / 212/1/ 212/2/ 213/ 214/1-214/ 2-214/3-214/4-214/5-214/6-214/7-214/8-214/9-214/10- 214/11-214/12-214/ 13,217,218,219/ 220/ 221/1-221/2- 221/3,223/ 224/1-224/2,225/ 226/ 227/ 229/ 1-229/2/ 231/ 232/ 233,235/ 236/ 237/1-237/2/ 240/ 241/ 242/ 243/ 244/ 245, 246/1/246/2/ 247/1,247/2 , 248/1 , 248/2, 251 / 1A- 251 / 1B, 251/2 , 252 , 253/1 , 253/2 , 254, 255/256/257, 258/ 259/ 260/261 , 264/1,270/ 1 , 271/ 1,272/ 1,273,274/ 1 , 275/1 , 276/ 1,277,278,279,280,281 , 282.

2. सरकारी भूमि:

1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 20 , 21/1 , 21/2 , 29 , 155 , 215 , 216 , 222 , 228 , 230 , 234 , 238 , 239, 249, 250, नाला ( भाग ) , सड़क ( भाग ), अस्थादी ।

3: वन भूमिम:

26871

4. आशक्षितमः

कम्पार्टमेंट क्रमांक 400 ( भार) , 401 ( পল) 482 ( পাস) सीमा वर्णन:

क-ख: रेखा नाले के मध्य से ग्राम सिन्हाला और ग्राम मसाला टुकूम की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा पर बिन्दु ' क ' से आरंभ

[ PART II SEC. 3 ( ii ) होती है और ग्राम वरवट और ग्राम सिन्हाला की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु ' ख' पर मिलती है ।

ख- ग : रेखा आरक्षित वन सीमा के कक्ष क्रमांक 388 और 389 की बाहरी सीमा और ग्राम सिन्हाला के प्लॉट संख्यांक 182/1 , 182/2, 182/3, 182/4, 187/ 1,187/2,189/2, 190 , 192/1 , 192/2 , 192/3 , 197/1 , 197/2 , 197/3 , 210 , 211 , 212/2 , 212/1 , 213 , की बाहय सीमा से गुजरती है फिर नाला पार करती है एवं प्लॉट संख्यांक 24/1 , 214/2 , 214/3 , 214/4 , 214/5 , 214/6 , 214/7 , 214/8 , 214/9 , 214/10 , 24/11 , 214/12,214/13 की बाहय सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु ' ग ' पर मिलती है ।

ग-घ: रेखा आरक्षित वन के कक्ष क्रमांक 400 , 401 , 402. से होकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु ' घ ' पर मिलती है । घ-ङ : ' रेखा आरक्षित वन के कक्ष क्रमांक 402 , 401 , 400 , से होकर गुजरती है फिर ग्राम सिन्हाला और आरक्षित वन सीमा को पार करती है , फिर ग्राम सिन्हाला से प्लॉट संख्यांक 262/1 , 261 से होकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु ' ङ ' पर मिलती है ।

हु- च : रेखा ग्राम सिन्हाला से होकर गुजरती है फिर प्लॉट संख्यांक 277 , 275/1 , 274/1 , 276/1 , 272/1 , 271/1 , 270/1 , 264/1 की बाहय सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है फिर सड़क पार करती है एवं प्लॉट संख्यांक 9/1 , 11/2 की बाहय सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है फिर ग्राम सिन्हाला आरक्षित वन सम्मिलित सीमा को पार करती है और कक्ष क्रमांक 400 से होकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु ' च ' पर मिलती है ।

च-क: रेखा ग्राम दुर्गापुर और आरक्षित वन कक्ष क्रमांक 400 की सम्मिलित सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है फिर ग्राम सिन्हाला और आरक्षित वन कक्ष क्रमांक 400 की सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है और ग्राम सिन्हाला से प्लॉट संख्यांक 33/1 , 33/2, 32 , 35 , 37/1 , 37/2 , 37/3 ,40 की बाहय सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है फिर सड़क से लगकर गुजरती है और नाला पार करती है फिर सड़क से लगकर गुजस्ती है और प्लॉट संख्यांक 113 , 115 , 118 , 117 की बाहय सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है फिर नाले से होकर आरंभिक बिन्दु ' क ' पर मिलती है ।

[फा. सं. एल-43015 /13/2008 - पीआरआईडब्ल्यू-1 ]:

एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर संचिव 5885 [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3; 2009/आश्विनः 11 , 1931

New Delhi , the 30th September , 2009

within thirty days of the issue of the notification , object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over such land.

Explanation:--

(1) It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operations in the land for the production of coal and that such operations should not be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person .

S.O. 2707. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S. O. 2764 dated the 29th September , 2008 , issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in the Gazette of India, Part II , Section - 3 , Sub- section ( ii ). dated the 4th October, 2008 , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 411.18 hectares (approximately ) or 1016.02 acres (epproximately) of the lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification;

And whereas , the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of said lands prescribed in the Schedule appended to this notification ;

Now, therefore,in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 1 ) of section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 , the Central Governmenthereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the land measuring 410.96 hectares (approximately) or 1015.52 acres (approximately) as , ' all rights' in or over the said lands described in the Schedule appended hereto:

(2) Every objection under sub - section ( 1 ) shall be made to the competent authority in writing , and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity ofbeing heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall , after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry, if any, as he thinks necessary, either make a report in respest of the land which has been notified under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 7 or of rights in or over such land, or make different reports in respect of different parcels ofsuch land or of rights in or over such land, to the Central Government , containing hisrecommendations on the objections , together with the record of proceedings held by him , for the decision of that Government .

(3) For the purpose of this section , a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act ."

Note 1: The plan bearing number C- 1 ( E ) III/JR/777-0309 datedthe 7th March , 2009 of the area coveredby thisnotification may be inspected in the office of the Collector, Chandrapur ( Maharashtra) or in the office ofthe Coal Controller, 1 Council House Street, Kolkata (Pin Code- 700 001 ) or in the office of the Western Coalfields Limited (Revenue Department), Coal Estate, Civil Lines , Nagpur-440001 (Maharashtra).

Note 2: Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of section 8 of the said Act which provides as follows:-

Objections toAcquisition :

Note3 : The Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata- 700 001 has been appointed by the Central Government as the competent authority under section 3 of the said Act , vide notification number S.O. 2519 dated the 27th May, 1983 , published In Part- 11 , Section 3, Sub-Section (ii ) of theGazette of India , dated the 11th June , 1983 .

"8(1 ) Any person interested in any land in respect ofwhich a notification under section 7 has been issued , may,

SCHEDULE

DURGAPUR DEEP EXTENSION OPEN CAST BLOCK CHANDPUR AREA DISTRICT CHANDRAPUR ( MAHARASHTRA)

ALL RIGHTS

(Plan bearing number C- 1 ( E) 111 /JR/777-0309dated the 7th March, 2009)|

Remarks

Tahsil and District

Patwari circle number

S1 . Name of No. the village

Tenancy

Land required in hectare Government Forest Total

29.29

260.09

295.56 Part

Sinhala

1 .

Chandrapur Chandrapur

06.18 59.20 54.26 115.40 Part

Comp. No.400

Chandrapur Division 5886

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 / ASVINA 11 , 1931

4 2

401

Chandrapur

Chandrapur Reserve Forest

402

Chandrapur

Inhectare

Total:

In acres Plot numbers to be acquired in village Sinhala :

(1) TENANCY/PRIVATE LAND:

2,8/ 1 , 9/1 , 11/1 , 11/2, 12, 13 , 14, 17 , 18 , 22/1 , 22/2 , 22/3, 23, 24, 25 , 26, 27, 28 , 30, 31 , 32, 33/1 , 33/2 . , 35, 36, 37/1-37/2-37/3 , 38, 39, 40, 113 , 114, 115, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121/1 , 121/2/121/3/122 , 123 , 124/1-124/2 , 125/1-125 /2 , 126 , 127/1-127/2, 128, 129 , 130, 131 , 132 , 133 , 134, 135 , 136/1 , 136/2 , 137/1 , 137/2, 138 , 139, 140/1 , 140/2 , 141/1 , 141/2, 142, 143/1 , 143/2, 144, 145/1 , 145/2, 145/3 , 145/4, 146, 147,148, 149, 150 , 151 , 152/1-52/2-152/3-152/4, 152/5, 153 , 154 , 156 , 157, 158, 159, 160/1 , 160/2, 160/3 , 160/4, 161/1 , 161/2, 162/14, 162/18, 162/2A, 162/28, 163/1 , 163/2, 164/1 , 164/2, 165/ 1A, 165/18 , 165/2 , 166/1 , 166/2 , 167/1 , 167/2 , 168 , 169/1 , 169/2, 169/3 , 170, 171/1 , 171/2, 172/1 , 172/2 , 173 / 1A, 173/18 , 173 /2A, 173 /2B, 174 , 175 , 176/1 , 176/2 , 177 , 178 / 1A, 178/18 , 178/2 , 179/1 , 179/2 , 179/3 , 180/1 , 180/2 , 180/3 , 181/1 , 181/2 , 181/3 , 181/4, 181/5 , 182/1 , 182/2, 182/3 , 182/4, 183, 184, 185, 186/1 , 186/2, 187/1 , 187/2, 188/ 1-188/2 , 188/3 , 189/ 1A, 189/18 , 189/2 , 190, 191/1 , 191/2 , 192/1 , 192/2 , 192/3 , 193 , 194 , 195/1 , 195/ 1A, 195/18 , 195/2A, 195/28 , 196 , 197/1 , 197/2 , 197/3 , 198 , 199 , 200, 201 / A, 201/ B, 201/C, 202/1 , 202/2 , 203 , 204, 205/1 , 205/2 , 205/3 , 205/4, 206/1,206/2 , 206/3 , 206/4, 206/5, 206/6, 207, 208/1 , 208/2, 208/3 , 209/1 , 209/2 , 209/3 , 210 , 211 , 212/1,212/2 , 213, 214/1,214/2, 214/3 , 214/4, 214/5, 214/6, 214/7, 214/8 , 214/9, 214/10, 214/11 , 214/12, 214/13 , 217 , 218 , 219, 220, 221/1 , 221/2 , 221/3 , 223 , 224/1 , 224/2 , 225, 226 , 227 ,229/1 , 229/2, 231 , 232, 233 , 235, 236, 237/ 1,237/2 , 240, 241 , 242, 243, 244, 245, 246/1,246/2,247/1,247 /2, 248/1,248/2,251 / 14, 251/18 , 251/2, 252 , 253/1 , 253/2,254,255,256,257,258,259, 260, 261 , 264/1 , 270/1 , 271 / 1,272/ 1,273,274/ 1,275/ 1,276/ 1 , 277,278,279, 280, 281 , 282.

(li )Government Land:

1, 3 , 4, 5, 6, 7, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21/1 , 21/2 , 29, 155 , 215, 216, 222 , 228 , 230 , 234, 238 , 239 , 249, 250 , Nallah (Part) , Road ( Part ), Abadi .

(ili) Forest Land:

262/1.

(iv) Reserve Forest:

Compartment number 400 (Part) , 401 ( Part), 402 (Part ), Boundary description:

A-B: Line starts from Point' A' along the centre point of Nallah and common village boundary of

[PART II-SEC. 3( il )] 6

01.94

29.29

260.09

121.58 410.96 (Approxi- mately

642.71 72.37

300.44 1015.52 (Approxi- mately) villages Sinhala and Masala Tukum then passes along with the common village boundary of villages Warwat and Sinhala and meets at Point 'B' .

-C: Line passes along the common boundary of Reserve Forest Compartment Numbers 388 & 399 and village Sinhala along the outer boundary of plotnumbers 182/1-182/2-182/3-182/4, 187-1187/ 2, 189/2, 190, 192/1-192/2-192/3 , 197/1-197/2- 197/3,210,211 , 212/2,212/ 1,213 / crosses nallah then passes along with the outer boundary of plotnumbers 214/1-214/2-214/3-214/4-214/5 , 214/6-214/7-214/8-214/9-214/10-214/11-214/ 12-214/13 and meets at Point 'C' .

C-D: Line passes through Reserved Forest in Compartment number 400, 401 , 402 and meets at Point' D' .

D-E: Line passes through Reserved forest in Compartment numbers 402, 401 , 400, then crosses common boundary of village Sinhala and Reserved forest then passes through village Sinhala in plot numbers 262/1 , 261 and meets at Point'E' .

E-F: Line passes through village Sinhala then passes along with the outer boundary of plot numbers 277,275/1,274/1,276/ 1 , 272/ 1,271 /1,270/1,264/ 1 crosses village Road then passes along with the outer boundary of plot numbers 9/1 , 11/2 then crossesthe common village boundary of village Sinhala and Reserve forest then passes through Compartment number 400 and meets at Point ' F' .

F-A: Line passes along with the common boundary of village Durgapur and Reserve forest Compartment number 400 then passes along the cornmon boundary of village Sinhala and Reserve. forest Compartment number 400 then passes through village Sinhala slongwith the outer boundary ofplot numbers 33 / 1-33/2, 32, 35, 37/1- 37/2-37/3 , 40, then passes along the Road crosses Nallah, again passes along the Road and then passes along the outer boundary ofplot numbers 113, 115 , 118 , 117 , then crosses Nallah and meets at starting Point' A' .

[F. No. 43015 / 13 /2008-PRIW- I ] M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy.

5887. [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) )

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली , 19 अगस्त, 2009

( 1962का 50 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण में मैसर्स गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन संलग्न सूची के कॉलम ( 1 ) में वर्णित व्यक्ति को कॉलम (2 ) में वर्णित क्षेत्र में सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का पालन करने के लिए नियुक्त करती है ।

अनुसूची

अधिकारीता का क्षेत्र

व्यक्ति का नाम और पता

का.आ. 2708.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप-नियम (4) के अनुसरण में पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय के प्रशासकीय नियंत्राधीन सार्वजनिक क्षेत्र के उपक्रमों के निम्मलिखित कार्यालयों को , जिनके 80 या अधिक प्रतिशत कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है:-

श्री प्रकाश जी. टी. निताली,

सम्पूर्ण कर्नाटक राज्य हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड

एसिस्टेन्ट कमिश्नर, मैसर्स गेल ( इण्डिया) लिमिटेड में प्रतिनियुक्ति पर गैल ( इण्डिया)

लिमिटेड , कारपोरेट माईलर

1. चाकण एलपीजी भराई संयंत्र चाकण तलेगांव हाईवे , महालुंगे इंगले पुणे-410501

(दूसरा तल ) 332/1 , थिमियाह

भारत पेट्रोलियम कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड

रोड, बसन्ध मगर,

बैंगलोर-560 052 , कर्नाटक

[फा. सं. एल-14014/29/'09-जी.पी. ] 2. बिजवासन प्रादेशिक कार्यालय एवं संस्थापन भर्तल रोड , पोस्ट ऑफिस बिजवासन दिल्ली -110061

के. के. शर्मा , अवर सचिव [सं. 11011/1/2007 (हिन्दी ) ]

NewDelhi , the 23rd September, 2009 जामकी आहूजा , उप निदेशक ( रा.भा. )

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURALGAS

New Delhi , the 19th August, 2009

S.O. 2709. Whereas, In pursuance of clause (a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962),the Government ofIndia hereby authorizes the person mentioned in column ( 1 ) of the Schedule given below to perform the functions of the Competent Authority under the said Act for laying pipelines by the said M/s . GAIL (India) Limited in the area mentioned in column (2 ) ofthe said Schedule.

SCHEDULE

S.O. 2708.-In pursuance of sub - rule (4 ) ofRule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official porposes ofthe Union) Rules, 1976 , the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of the Public Sector Undertakings under the administrative control of the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas , in which 80 or more percent of the staff have acquired working knowledge ofHindi .

Area of Jurisdiction

Name andAddress of the Person

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited

1. Chakan LPG Bottling Plant

Whole State of Karnataka .

Shri PrakashG. T. Nittali ,

Asstt. Commissioner

Chakan Telegaun Highway, Mahalunge Ingle Pune-410501

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

on deputation basis to M/s. GAIL( India) Limited, CorporateMiller, ( IInd Floor) 332/1 , Thimmiah V Road, VasanthNagar,

2. Bijwasan Regional Office & Location. Bhartal Road, Post Office Bijwasan Delhi- 110061 .

Bangalore- 560052, Karnakaka.

[No. 11011/1/2007 (Hindi ) ]

[F. No. L- 14014/29/09-G.P. ] JANKI AHUJA , Dy . Director ( OL)

K. K. SHARMA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 23 सितम्बर , 2009

नई दिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2709.- भारत सरकार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाईन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962

का.आ. 2710.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में वाडीनार से मध्य प्रदेश 5888

[PART 11 SEC.3 ( 11 ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 /ASVINA 11 , 1931

New Delhi , the 23rd September , 2009 राज्य में बीना तक क्रूड ऑयल के परिवहन हेतु भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाईपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

S.O. 2710. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that fortransportation of crude oil from Vadinar in the State of Gujarat to Bina in the state of Madhya Pradesh , a pipeline should be laidby Bharat Oman Refineries Limited;

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में , जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाईपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline . it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाईपलाइन बिछाई जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के संबंध में श्री एस. के. ब्रह्मभट्ट , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , वाडीनार बीना क्रूड ऑयल पाईपलाइन परियोजना , भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड , 14-14 - ए, कृष्णा बंग्लोज , प्रहलादनगर, अहमदाबाद-380 051 ( गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

Any person , interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this Notification are made available to the public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri.S. K. Brahmbhatt,Competent Authority, Vadinar-Bina ( rude Oil Pipeline Project , Bharat Oman Refineries Limited , 14 & 14-A. Krishna Bungalow, Near Prahladnagar, B /h . V.S.N.L. Bldg. Ahmedabad- 380 051 (Gujarat ) .

तहसील : घोलका जिला : अहमदाबाद राज्य: गुजरात

SCHEDULE.

सर्वे नंबर

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टेयर में

District : Ahmedabad State : Gujaral क्र.सं. गांव का नाम

Tehsil : Dholka

Survey No. Area in Thectare

S. Name ofVillage No.

1. कोठ

380पैकी 3 00.1500

1 2

00.0004

2. रूपगढ़

00.1500

380 P 3

1. Koth

00.4638

3. खरांटी

00.0004

2. Rupgadh

00.0244

304

00.4638

3. Kharenti

320

00.0559

00.0244

30-1

00.0559

320

4. सीमेज

727

00.1250

727

4. Simei

954

5. पीसावाडा

00.0002

954

5. Pisawada

46/4

00.1925

6. वीरपुर

00.1925

46/4

6. Virpur

312

7. गीरंद

00.0580

312

7. Girand

[फा. सं. आर. - 31015/31/2009- ओआर-11 ]

[F. No. R-31015/31 /2009 -OR -II ]

ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव

A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy .

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/ आश्विन 11 , 1931

5889.

नई दिल्ली , 23 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2711. केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962का 50 ) की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की नीचे दी गई अधिसूची में यथा उल्लिखित तारीखों की संख्या का. आ. द्वारा उन अधिसूचनाओं से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया था ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उक्त भूमियों में सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त उपयोग का अधिकार भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित किया था ।

और जबकि सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दी है कि मोटर स्प्रिट , उच्च कोटि का मिट्टी का तेल और वेग डीजल के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड के मध्य प्रदेश राज्य स्थित मांग्लया संस्थापन से दिल्ली राज्य स्थित बिजवासन संस्थापन तक उपर्युक्त भूमियों में पाईपलाईन बिछाई जा चुकी है। चूंकी राजस्थान राज्य के जिला झालावाड़ में पाईपलाईन बिछाई जा चुकी है , अतः ऐसी भूमि के बारे में जिसका विवरण इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची से.विनिर्दिष्ट है , प्रचालन समाप्त किया जाए; अतः केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम पाईपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1963 के नियम 4 के स्पष्टीकरण । के अधीन अपेक्षानुसार उक्त अनुसूची के स्तंभ 7 में उल्लिखित तारीखों को जिला झालावाड़ , राजस्थान राज्य में प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख के रूप में घोषित करती है ।

अनुसूची

गांव का नाम

तहसील क्र.सं. का.आ.नं. व तारीख

4 1 2

1. 4313/3323

सरखेड़ी

पिड़ावा 15-9-2005

रामपुरिया

पिड़ावा

रामटी

पिड़ावा

पिड़ावों

शेरपुर

पिड़ावा

दौलतपुरा

धरोनिया

पिड़ावा

निमाहेडा

पिड़ावा

कचराखेडी

पिड़ावा

फतेहगढ़

पिड़ावा

खिजरपुर

पिड़ावा

बानोर

पिड़ावा

आसौदिया

पिड़ावा

कोटडी खुर्द

सेमली भवानी

पिड़ावा

बोरबंद

पिड़ावा

दीवलखेडा

पिड़ावा

मूंडला

पिड़ावा

कल्याणपुरा

पिड़ावा ১

पिड़ावा

बजरंगपुरा

पिड़ावा

रघुनाथपुरा

डावल

पिड़ावा }

सालरी

पिड़ावा

सेमली कल्याण

पिड़ावा जिला

राज्य

प्रचालन समाप्ति कोतारीख 5

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

राजस्थान

15-12-2008 झालावाड़

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़ 5890

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 /ASVINA 11 , 1931

4 2. 2148 1-6-2006

पिड़ावा

रामपुरिया

कोटडीखुर्द

पिड़ावा

शेरपुर

दीवलखेडा

पिड़ावा

कल्याणपुरा

सालरी

पिड़ावा

संमली

3. 31208-8-2006

पिड़ावा

कल्याण

पिड़ावा

मूडला

फतेहगढ़

पिड़ावा

कचराखेडी

पिड़ावा

नीगाहेडा

पिड़ावा

पिड़ावा 4. 2561 10-9-2008

पिड़ावा

रघुनाथपुरा

चंगेरी

झालरापाटन 5. 1994 2-6-2005

सेमली पटपडिया

झालरापाटन

गिन्दोर

झालरापाटन

मुंडेरी

झालरापाटन

चौदियाखेडी

झालरापाटन

मालीपुरा

झालरापाटन

गोविंदपुरा

झालरापाटन

गुवाडीकला

झालरापाटन

गुवाडीखुर्द

टोलखेडा

झालरापाटन

जरेल

झालरापाटन

डाबली-

कला

झालरापाटन

माधोपुर

चंगेरी

झालरापाटन 6. 4645

9-12-2005

झालरापाटन

गिन्दोर

झालरापाटन

चौदियाखेड़ी

झालरापाटन

मालीपुरा

झालरापाटन

टोलखेडा

झालरापाटन

जरेल

झालरापाटन

डाबलीकला

झालरापाटन

माधोपुर

झालरापाटन 7. 858 27-2-2006 बक्शपुरा

झालरापाटन

मूण्डलाखेडा

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

राजस्थान

15-12-2008 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

15-12-2008 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

15-12-2008 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

15-12-2008 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

15-12-2008 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

15-12-2008 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

15-12-2008 झालावाड़

15-12-2008

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

राजस्थान

15-12-2008 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

15-12-2008 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

15-12-2008 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

15-12-2008 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

15-12-2008 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

30-9-2007 झालावाड़

30-9-2007

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

30-9-2007

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

राजस्थान

30-9-2007 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

30-9-2007 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

30-9-2007 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

30-9-2007 झालावाड़

30-9-2007

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

राजस्थान

30-9-2007 झालावाड़

30-9-2007

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

30-9-2007

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

30-9-2007

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

30-9-2007

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

राजस्थान

30-9-2007 झालावाड़

30-9-2007

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

30-9-2007

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

30-9-2007

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

राजस्थान

30-9-2007 झालावाड़

30-9-2007

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

30-9-2007

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

30-9-2007

राजस्थान

झालाबाड़

राजस्थान

30-9-2007 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

30-9-2007 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

30-9-2007 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

30-9-2007 झालावाड़ [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

5891

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3, 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

4 2

8. 4000

गिन्दोर

झालरापाटन 9-10-2006

चाँदियाखेड़ी

झालरापाटन

मालीपुरा

झालरापाटन

चंगेरी

9. 1799-21-6-2007

झालरापाटन

सेमलीपटपडिया

10. 1800-21-6-2007

झालरापाटन

गोविंदपुरा

हीचर

11. 2248-24-6-2005

खानपुर

लायफल

खानपुर

पनवाड

खानपुर

बागोद

खानपुर

बिशनखेडी

खानपुर 12. 739-23-2-2006 समदखेड़ी

खानपुर

बोरदा

13. 740-23-2-2006

खानपुर

पनवाड

खानपुर

उम्मेदपुरा

लायफल

खानपुर 14. 741-23-2-2006 बोरदा

खानपुर

चोसला

खानपुर

पनवाड

खानपुर

उम्मेदपुरा

हीचर

खानपुर

लायफल

खानपुर

बागोद

खानपुर

जीरापुर

राजस्थान

30-9-2007 झालावाड़

30-9-2007

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

30-9-2007

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

30-9-2007

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

30-9-2007

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

राजस्थान

30-9-2007 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

30-9-2007 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

20-9-2006.

झालावाड़

राजस्थान

20-9-2006 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

20-9-2006 झालावाड़

20-9-2006

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

राजस्थान

20-9-2006 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

20-9-2006 झाल्गवाड़

20-9-2006

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

20-9-2006

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

20-9-2006

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

20-9-2006

राजस्थान

झालावाड

राजस्थान

20-9-2006 झालावाड़

20-9-2006

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

20-9-2006

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

राजस्थान

20-9-2006 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

20-9-2006 झालावाड़

राजस्थान

20-9-2006 झालावाड़

20-9-2006

राजस्थान

झालावाड़

राजस्थान

20-9-2006 झालावाड़

[फा. सं. आर.-31015/43/2009 ओ आर-11 ]

ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 23rd September, 2009

S. O. 2711.- Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas , S.O. Nos . and dates as mentioned in the Schedule below issued under Sub- section ( i) of Section (6), Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government acquired the Right ofUser in the said lands specified in the schedule appended to those notification.

And Whereas , in exercise of powers conferred by Sub- section (4 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government vested the right of user in the lands free from all encumbrances in the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited.

And Whereas , the Competent Authority has made a report to the Central Government that the pipeline for the purpose oftransportation of motor sprit, Superior Kerosene Oil and High Speed Diesel from Manglya in the State of Madhya Pradesh to Bijwasan in the state of Delhi has been laid in the said lands and hence the operation may be terminated in District Jhalawar in the State of Rajasthan in respect of the said lands which in brief are specified in the Schedule annexed to this Notification.

Now, therefore, as required under explanation 1 of Rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Rules 1963, the Central Govemment hereby declares the dates mentioned in column 7 ofthe said schedule as the dates of termination in District Jhalawar in the State of Rajasthan.

5892

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ASVINA 11 , 1931

SCHEDULE S.O. No. and date

Tehsil

Name ofVillage SI . No.

Sarkhedi

Pidawa 1. 4313/3323 , 15-9-2005

Pidawa

Rampuriya

Ramti

Pidawa

Sherpur

Pidawa

Daulatpura

Pidawa

Dharoniya

Nimaheda

Pidawa

Kachra Khedi

Pidawa

Fatehgarh

Pidawa

Khijarpur

Banor

Pidawa

Asondiya

Kotri Khurd

Pidawa

Semli Bhawani

Borbandh

Pidawa

Diwal Kheda

Pidawa

Mundla

Pidawa

Kalyan pura

Pidawa

Bajrang pura

Pidawa

Raghunath pura

Dawal

Pidawa

Salri

Pidawa

Semli Kalyan

2. 2148 , 1-6-2006

Pidawa

Rampuriya

Kotri Khurd

Pidawa

Sherpur

Pidawa

Diwal Kheda

Pidawa

Kalyan pura

Salri

Pidawa

Pidawa 3. 3120, 8-8-2006

Semli Kalyan

Mundla

Pidawa

Fatehgarh

Kachra Khedi

Pidawa

Nimaheda

Dawal

Pidawa 4. 2561 , 10-9-2008

Pidawa

Raghunath pura 5. 1994, 2-6-2005

Changeri

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] District

State

Date of Termination

7 5

Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

Rajasthan 15-12-2008 Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

Rajasthan 15-12-2008 Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

Rajasthan 15-12-2008 Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

Rajasthan 15-12-2008 Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

Rajasthan 15-12-2008 Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

Rajasthan 15-12-2008 Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

Rajasthan 15-12-2008 Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

15-12-2008

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

Jhalarapatan

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

Jhalarapatan

Semli patpadia

Gindhor

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Jhalarapatan

Munderi

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Jhalarapatan

Chandia Kheri

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Jhalarapatan

Malipura

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

Govindpura

Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

Guwadi Kalan

5893

7 5

Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

Guwadi Khurd Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

Tolkheda Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

Jarel

Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

Dabali Kalan Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Jhalarapatan

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

Madhopur 6. 4645,9-12-2005

Changeri

Gindhor

Chandia Khedi

30-9-2007

Jhalarapatan Jhalawar

Rajasthan

Rajasthan 30-9-2007

Jhalarapatan Jhalawar

Jhalawar

Rajasthan 30-9-2007

Jhalarapatan

Jhalawar

Jhalarapatan

Malipura

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

Tol Kheda Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

Jarel

Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

Dabli Kalan Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

Madhopur 7. 858 , 27-2-2006

Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

Bakshpura

Mundla Khera Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

Gindhor 8. 4000 , 9-10-2006

Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

Chandia Khedi Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

30-9-2007 Jhalawar

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

Malipura Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

Jhalarapatan 9. 1799, 21-6-2007

Changeri Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

10. 1800 , 21-6-2007

Semli patpadia Jhalawar

30-9-2007

Rajasthan

Jhalarapatan

Govindpura

Hichar 11. 2248.24-6-2005

Khanpur

Laifal

Khanpur

Panwad

Khanpur

Bagod

Bhisankhedi

Khanpur

Samadkhedi 12. 739 , 23-2-2006

Khanpur

Borda 13. 740 , 23-2-2006

Khanpur

Panwad

Khanpur

Ummedpura

Laifal

Khanpur

Borda 14. 741 , 23-2-2006

Khanpur

Chosla

Khanpur

Panwad

Khanpur

Ummedpura

Hichar

Khanpur

Laifal

Khanpur

Bagod

Jirapur Jhalawar

20-9-2006

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

20-9-2006

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

20-9-2006

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

20-9-2006

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

20-9-2006

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

20-9-2006

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

20-9-2006

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

20-9-2006

Rajasthan

20-9-2006 Jhalawar

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

20-9-2006

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

20-9-2006

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

20-9-2006

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

20-9-2006

Rajasthan

20-9-2006 Jhalawar

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

20-9-2006

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

20-9-2006

Rajasthan

20-9-2006 Jhalawar

Rajasthan

Jhalawar

20-9-2006

Rajasthan

Khanpur

[F. No. R- 31015 /43/2009 -OR- II ]

A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy .

5894

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 /ASVINA 11 , 1931

नई दिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ.. 2712. केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि गुजरात राज्य में वाडीनार से मध्यप्रदेश राज्य में बीना तक क्रूड ऑयल के परिवहन हेतु भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाईपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसी पाईपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में, जो इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , जिसमें उक्त पाईपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाईपलाइन बिछाई जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के संबंध में श्री एस. के. ब्रह्मभट्ट , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , वाडीनार बीना क्रूड ऑयल पाईपलाइन परियोजना , भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड , 14-14- ए, कृष्णा बांलोज , प्रहलादनगर, अहमदाबाद -380 051 ( गुजरात ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

तहसील : नडीयाद

अनुसूची जिला : खेडा

राज्य : गुजरात

सर्वे नंबर

क्र.सं. गांव का नाम

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टेयर में

1 2

860

1 . पीज

00.1000

953

00.1729

1273

00.1316 2. पीपलाता

1231

00.0490

PART II SEC. 3 ( i)|

1 2

चलाली

00.0859 7.

00.0796

839 192पैकी

[फा.सं. आर. - 31015/35 /2009- ओआर -11 ]

ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 23rd September , 2009 S. O. 2712.-Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that fortransportation of crude oil from Vadinar in the State of Gujarat to Bina in the state ofMadhya Pradesh , a pipeline should be laid by Bharat Oman Refineries Limited;

And whereas it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the power conferredby sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines(Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person, interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this Notification are made available to the public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri S. K. Brahmbhatt, Competent Authority, Vadinar - Bina Crude Oil Pipeline Project , Bharat Oman Refineries Limited, 14 & 14 -A . Krishna Bungalow, Near Prahladnagar , B /h . V.S.N.L. Bldg.

Ahmedabad-380051 (Gujarat) . SCHEDULE District: Kheda

Tehsil: Nadiad

State :Gujarat

SurveyNo.

S. Name ofVillage

Area in Hectare No.

4 12

860

00.1000 1. Pij

953

00.1729

1273

00.1316

00.0490

1231

2. Piplata

1272

00.2784

1308

00.2250

347

00.1250 3. पीपलग

00.2784

1272

00.2250

1308

347

00.1250 3. Piplag

658 पैकी

00.0250

350

00.0741

351

00.0360

650

00.0248 4.

1191/1 पैकी 00.0797 नडीयाद

00.0250

658 P

00.0741

350

351

00.0360

00.0248

650

00.0797

1191/ IP

4. Nadiad

437

00.0744 5. Saluntałpad

00.0617

692

6. Kanjoda

437

00.0744 5. सलुनतलपद

00.0617 6. कंजोडा

692

693

00.0345

616

00.0836

707

00.0449

00.0345

693

00.0836

616

00.0449

707

7. Chalali

00.0859 00.0796

839 192 P

[F. No. R- 31015/35/2009-OR - II ] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.

भारत का राजपत्र : अमसूर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड3 ( ii) ]

5895

नई दिल्ली , 30 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2713.- पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962का 50 ) के नियम 2 (क ) के अन्तर्गत , मैसर्स रिलांयस गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड (आर.जी.टी.आई.एल. ) के द्वारा आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में प्राकृतिक गैस पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने हेतु सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कार्यों का निर्वहन करने के लिए, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की, भारत के राजपत्र दिनांक 29अक्तूबर , 2005 को प्रकाशित, अधिसूचना का.आ. 3962 दिनांक 25 अक्तूबर , 2005 द्वारा पदस्थापित, मैं, के. गंगाचलम , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) नियमावली, 1963 के नियम 4 के उप नियम ( 1 ) के नीचे दी गई व्याख्या ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत अधिकारों के अनुपालन में, मैसर्स आर.जी.टी.आई. एल. , जिसमें यथास्थित , उस क्षेत्र में भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार निहित किया गया है और उस क्षेत्र में पाइपलाइन का स्वामित्व निहित है , के परामर्श से, संलग्न अनुसूची के स्तम्भ 4 में आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य के पूर्वी गोदावरी और पश्चिमी गोदावरी जिले में यथा उल्लेखित प्राकृतिक गैस पाइपलाइन विछाए जाने के प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीखों की घोषित करताहूँ ।

अनुसूची

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक : ताल्लरेवु

क . स .

ग्राम का नाम

1145 पोलेकुरु

4421

4475

3222

राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला:पूर्वी गोदद्यावरी

धारा 6 (1 ) की का . आ. संख्या एवं दिनांक

प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख 3

05-09-2009 07-04-2003

दिनांक

16-11-2006

दिनांक

24-11-2006

दिनांक

31-10-2007

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

2149(अ)

28-08-2009

दिनांक

2212(अ)

1145 2 मल्लवरम

4421

4475

3222 07-04-2003

30-08-2009 दिनांक

16-11-2006

दिनांक

24-11-2006

दिनांक

31-10-2007

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

2149(अ)

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक:काजुलूरु

1145 1 पल्लेपालेम

4475

राज्य :आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला: पूर्वी गौदद्यावरी

07-04-2003

दिनांक

05-09-2009 दिनांक 24-11-2006

28-08-2009

दिनांक

2212(अ)

.1145 शीला

4475 07-04-2003

दिनांक

15-12-2008 24-11-2006

दिनांक 5896

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 /ASHVINA 11 , 1931

1145 3 काजुलू

4421

4475

2149(अ)

2212(अ)

1145 4 तरलमपूडि

4421

4475

1145 5 जगन्नादगिरि

4421

4475

[ Part 11--Sec . 3 ( ii ) ) 3

07-04-2003

05-09-2009 दिनांक

16-11-2006

दिनांक

दिनांक 24-11-2006

दिनांक 18-08-2009

28-08-2009

दिनांक

07-04-2003 10-05-2009 दिनांक

16-11-2006

दिनांक

24-11-2006

दिनांक

15-05-2009 07-04-2003

16-11-2006

दिनांक दिनांक

24-11-2006

दिनांक

राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला: पूर्वी गोदावरी

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक : करपा

1145 1 पेददापुरप्पाडु

4475

1145 2 एंडमूरु

4475 3

1145 जि। बावारम

4475

1145 4 सिरिपुरम

4475

3222

10-05-2009 07-04-2003

दिनांक

24-11-2006

दिनांक

07-04-2003

15-05-2009 दिनांक

24-11-2006

दिनांक

05-02-2009 07-04-2003

दिनांक

24-11-2006

दिनांक

10-02-2009 दिनांक 07-04-2003

24-11-2006

दिनांक

31-10-2007

दिनांक

राज्य :आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला: पूर्वी गोदावरी

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक:रामचंद्रापुरम

1145 1 कापवरम

4475

3222 2

1145

4475

1145 3 नरसापुरपुपेटा

4475 4

1145. अमवकापल्ले

4475

1145 5 चोडवरम

4475

3222

01-02-2009 07-04-2003

दिनांक

24-11-2006

दिनांक

31-10-2007

दिनांक

12-02-2009 07-04-2003

दिनांक

24-11-2006

दिनांक

10-05-2009 07-04-2003

दिनांक

24-11-2006

दिनांक

10-05-2009 07-04-2003

दिनांक

24-11-2006

दिनांक

15-05-2009 07-04-2003

दिनांक

24-11-2006

दिनांक

31-10-2007

दिनांक 5897 [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3, 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला: पूर्वी गोदावरी

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक :रायवरम

1081

15-05-2009

03-04-2003

दिनांक

नदुरवादा

4475

दिनांक 24-11-2006

दिनांक 11-04-2007

583 (अ)

3222

दिनांक 31-10-2007

25-12-2008 2

1081

03-04-2003

दिनांक

वेदुरुपाका

24-11-2006

4475

दिनांक

11-04-2007

दिनांक

583(अ)

31-10-2007

3222

दिनांक

1081

25-12-2008

03-04-2003

लोल्ल

दिनांक

24-11-2006

4475

दिनांक

राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला : पूर्वी गोदावरी

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक:अनपरति

25-12-2008 1

03-04-2003

1081

महेंद्रवाडा

दिनांक

4475

दिनांक 24-11-2006

25-12-2008

03-04-2003

1081

दिनांक

रामवरम

4475

24-11-2006

दिनांक

11-04-2007

दिनांक

583(अ)

3.222

31-10-2007

दिनांकं

1081

25-12-2008

दिनांक 03-04-2003

पोलमूर्

24-11-2006

4475

दिनांक

3222

31-10-2007

दिनांक

राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला:पूर्वी गोदावरी

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक:मंडपेट

1081

25-12-2008 1

दिनांक 03-04-2003

आर्तमूरु

24-11-2006

4475

दिनांक

3222

31-10-2007

दिनांक

25-12-2008

1081

03-04-2003

दिनांक

तापेश्वराम

4475

24-11-2006

दिनांक

11-04-2007

दिनांक

583(अ)

25-12-2008 3

1081

03-04-2003

दिनांक

इप्पनपाडु

4475

24-11-2006

दिनांक

11-04-2007

दिनांक

583(अ)

3222

31-10-2007

दिनांक

1081

05-09-2009

03-04-2003

दिनांक

4 पालतोडु

4475

24-11-2006

दिनांक

11-04-2007

दिनांक

583 (अ) 5898

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ASHVINA 11 , 1931

3222 पालतोड्छु (निरंतर)

2212 (अ) 5

1081 वेलगतोडु

4475

58.3(अ)

3222 6

770 एडिदा

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक :कडियम

[ Part 11-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

31-10-2007

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

03-04-2003

दिनांक

25-12-2008 दिनांक 24-11-2006

11-04-2007

दिनांक

31-10-2007

दिनांक

01-03-2005

25-12-2008 दिनांक

राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला : पूर्वी गोदावरी

770 मुरुमांडा

01-03-2005 25-12-2008 दिनांक

राज्य :आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला : पूर्वी गोदावरी

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक आलमूरु

770 मडिकि

770 बहुगुनिवानिलंक

2212 (अ)

770 3 गोतमि गोदाायरि रिवर

25-12-2008 01-03-2005

दिनांक

01-03-2005

दिनांक

05-09-2009 28-08-2009

दिनांक

01-11-2008 दिनांक 01-03-2005

राज्य आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला : पूर्वी गोदावरी

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक आतेयपुरम

770 1 आवेयपुरम

2212 (अ) 2

770

1762(अ)

3222 3

770 वसंतवाडा

1762(अ)

3222

2149 (अ) 4

770 बशिस्ट गोदावरि रिवर

01-03-2005

दिनांक

05-09-2009 दिनांक 28-08-2009

15-11-2008 01-03-2005

दिनांक

13-10-2006

दिनांक

31-10-2007

दिनांक

01-03-2005

30-08-2009 दिनांक

13-10-2006

दिनांक

31-10-2007

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

01-03-2005 01-11-2008 दिनांक

जिला : पश्चिमी गोदावरी

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक उपेरबलि

770 कानूरुजमिंदारि

1762(अ) 2

770 कानूर अग्रहारम

770 3 नाडुपल्ले

राज्य आन्ध्र प्रदेश

01-11-2008 01-03-2005

दिनांक

दिनांक 13-10-2006

01-03-2005

दिनांक

01-11-2008 01-03-2005

दिनांक

20-12-2008 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/ आश्विन 11 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

5899

दिनांक 13-10-2006

1762 (अ)

3. नाडुपल्ले (निरंतर)

3223 मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक:निडदवोलु

1 मुनिपल्लि

31-10-2007

दिनांक

राज्य :आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला : पश्चिमी गोदावरी

15-05-2009 दिनांक 13-10-2006

1762(अ)

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक :उंदाजवरम

जिला: पश्चिमी गोदाबरी

राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश

30-08-2009 13-10-2006

दिनांक

1762(अ)

वेलिवेन्नु

3223 31-10-2007

दिनांक

दिनांक 18-08-2009

2149(अ)

770 2 काल्दरि

20-05-2009 01-03-2005

दिनांक

13-10-2006

दिनांक

1762(अ)

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक ॥ताडेपल्लि गूडेम

1 नंदमूरु

राज्य आन्ध प्रदेश

जिला: पश्चिमी गोदावरी

05-09-2009 13-10-2006

दिनांक

1762(अ)

3223 31-10-2007

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

2212(अ)

770 2 जगन्नाद पुरम

05-09-2009 01-03-2005

दिनांक

13-10-2006

दिनांक

1762(अ)

3223

2149(अ) 31-10-2007

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

2212(अ)

770 3 आरुगोलनु

17.62(अ)

3223

2149 (अ)

770 4 कुन्चनपल्लि

1762(अ)

3223

770 5 कोन्डुप्रोलु

1762(अ)

3223

2149(अ)

30-08-2009 दिनांक 01-03-2005

13-10-2006

दिनांक

31-10-2007

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

01-03-2005

28-12-2008 दिनांक

दिनांक 13-10-2006:

दिनांक 31-10-2007

30-08-2009 01-03-2005

दिनांक

13-10-2006

दिनांक

दिनांक 31-10-2007

दिनांक 18-08-2009 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 /ASHVINA 11 , 1931

5900

770 6 ताडेपल्ले

1762(अ)

3223

2212(अ)

[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii) ]

05-09-2009 01-03-2005

दिनांक

13-10-2006

दिनांक

31-10-2007

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला: पश्चिमी गोदावरी

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक उंगुटूरु

1114 वादमपुडि

2078(अ)

1114 2 यल्लामिल्लि

2078 (अ)

3223

2149(अ)

2212(अ)

1114 3 उंगुर

2078 (अ)

3223

1114 4 चेटोल

3223

1114 5 कैकाराम

3223

28-12-2008 21-03-2005

दिनांक

06-12-2006

दिनांक

05-09-2009 21-03-2005

दिनांक

दिनांक 06-12-2006

31-10-2007

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

10-05-2009 21-03-2005

दिनांक

06-12-2006

दिनांक

31-10-2007

दिनांक

12-05-2009 21-03-2005

दिनांक

31-10-2007

दिनांक

15-05-2009 21-03-2005

दिनांक

दिनांक 31-10-2007

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला: पश्चिमी गोदावरी

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: भिमडोलु

1114 1.

पूल्ला

2078(अ)

3223

2149(अ)

2212(अ)

1114 2 अम्बारपेटा

2149(अ)

2212(अ)

1114 3 भिमडोलु

2078(अ) 21-03-2005

05-09-2009 दिनांक

06-12-2006

दिनांक

31-10-2007

दिनांक

18-08-2009

'दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

05-09-2009 21-03-2005

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

30-08-2009 दिनांक 21-03-2005

दिनांक 06-12-2006 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

5901

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

3223 भिमडोलु (निरंतर)

2149(अ) 4

1114 सुरप्पागुडेम

1114 गुन्डुगोलनु

3223

2149(अ) 3

31-10-2007

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

21-03-2005

15-11-2008 दिनांक

30-08-2009 21-03-2005

दिनांक

31-10-2007

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

जिला : पश्चिमी गोदावरी

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक देंदुलूरु

1114 सिंगवरम

1114 2 कोमिरेप्पल्लि

3223

2149(अ) 3

1114

3223

2212 (अ) 4

1114 कोत्तगूडेम

1114 उप्पुगूडेम

1114 6 वेगावराम

11.14

2212(अ)

-1114 8 चल्लपल्लि

3223

राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश दिनांक 21-03-2005

15-11-2008

30-08-2009 21-03-2005

दिनांक

दिनांक 31-10-2007

18-08-2009

दिनांक

05-09-2009 दिनांक 21-03-2005

दिनांक 31-10-2007

28-08-2009

दिनांक

01-11-2008 21-03-2005

दिनांक

01-11-2008 21-03-2005

दिनांक

01-11-2008 दिनांक 21-03-2005

05-09-2009 21-03-2005

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

01-11-2008 दिनांक 21-03-2005

31-10-2007

दिनांक

जिला: पश्चिमी गोदावरी

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: एलूरु

1116 1 चोडिमेल्ला

3223

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश 21-03-2005

दिनांक

01-11-2008 31-10-2007

दिनांक

जिला: पश्चिमी गोदावरी

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: पेदवेगि

1116 1

3223 2

1116 जगन्नादपुरमु

1116 3 पिनकडिमिः

3223

राज्य:आन्ध्र प्रदेश 21-03-2005

दिनांक

01-11-2008 31-10-2007

दिनांक

21-03-2005 01-11-2008 दिनांक

21-03-2005

01-11-2008 दिनांक

31-10-2007

दिनांक 5902

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ASHVINA 11. 1931

1116 कोप्पाका

3223

Part 11-Sec . 3 ( ii ) | 3

21-03-2005

दिनांक

05-09-2009

दिनांक 31-10-2007

28-08-2009

दिनांक

2212(अ)

पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 की धारा 17 के अन्तर्गत संरचित पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) नियम 1963 के नियम 4 के अन्तर्गत भारत सरकार के राजपत्र के प्रकाशनार्थ.

[पत्र. सं. एल-14014/38/2009-जी.पी.

के.के. शर्मा, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 30th September, 2009

S. O. 2713. In pursuance of powers conferred by Explanation 1 in sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Rules, 1963 , 1, K.Gangachalam, appointed by Government of India, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas vide Notification S.O.3962 dated 25th October, 2005 (published in the Gazette of India on 29th October , 2005 ) under Section 2(a) of the Petroleum & Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition ofRight of User in Land) Act , 1962(50 of 1962 ) to perform the functions of Competent Authority for laying natural gas pipelines by M/s Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited (RGTIL) in the State of Andhra Pradesh, in consultation with M/ s RGTIL, to whom the Right of User in the land in that area has been vested and in whom the ownership of the pipeline in that area vests, hereby, declare the dates, mentioned in Column 4 of the Schedule annexed herewith, as the dates of termination of RoU operation in Districts East Godavari and West Godavari in the State of Andhra Pradesh.

Schedule

State: Andhra Pradesh

District: East Godavari

Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk: Tallarevu

SI . No.

Village

1145 1 Potekurru

4421

4475

3222

2149(E)

2212(E) 2

1145 Mallavaram

4421

4475

3222

2149 (E)

Date ofTermination ofOperation

S.O. No. and Date of Notification under sub-section(1 ) of Section 6

05-09-2009 07-04-2003

Date

16-11-2006

Date

24-11-2006

Date

31-10-2007

Date

18-08-2009

Date

26-08-2009

Date

30-08-2009 07-04-2003

Date

16-11-2006

Date

24-11-2006

Date

31-10-2007

Date

18-06-2009

Date [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

5903

भारत का रामपत्र : आस्तूबर 3, 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

State : Andhra Pradesh

District : East Godavari

Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk : Kajuluru

1145 1 Pallepalem

4475

2212( E) 2

1145 Sila

4475 3

1145 Kajuluru

4421

4475

2149(E)

2212(E ) 4

1145 Tarlamapudi

4421

4475 5

1145 Jagannadhagiri

4421

4475 3

05-09-2009 07-04-2003

Date

24-11-2006

Date

Date 28-08-2009

15-12-2008 07-04-2003

Date

Date 24-11-2006

05-09-2009 07-04-2003

Date

16-11-2006

Date

24-11-2006

Date

Date 18-08-2009

28-08-2009

Date

10-05-2009 07-04-2003

Date

Date 16-11-2006

24-11-2006

Date

Date 07-04-2003

15-05-2009

Date 16-11-2006

Date 24-11-2006

State : Andhra Pradesh

District : East Godavari

Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk : Karapa

1145 Peddapurappadu

4475 2

1145 Endamuru

4475 3

1145 G.Bhavaram

4475

1145 4 Siripuram

4475

3222 Mandal /Tehsil /Taluk : Ramachandrapuram

1145 1 Kapavaram

4475

3222

1145 2 Oduru

4475

1145 3 Narsapurapupeta

4475

10-05-2009 07-04-2003

Date

24-11-2006

Date

15-05-2009 07-04-2003

Date

Date 24-11-2006

05-02-2009 07-04-2003

Date

Date 24-11-2006

10-02-2009 07-04-2003

Date

24-11-2006

Date

31-10-2007

Date

District : East Godavari State : Andhra Pradesh

01-02-2009 07-04-2003

Date

24-11-2006

Date.

31-10-2007

Date

12-02-2009

Date 07-04-2003

Date 24-11-2006

10-05-2009 07-04-2003

Date

24-11-2006

Date 5904

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ASHVINA 11 , 1931

1145 Ambikapalle

4475 5

1145 Chodavaram

4475

3222

[Part 11-Sec . 3 ( ii)] 3

07-04-2003

10-05-2009 Date

24-11-2006

Date

07-04-2003

15-05-2009 Date

Date 24-11-2006

Date 31-10-2007

District : East Godavari

Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk : Rayavaram 1

1081 Nadurubada

4475

583 (Ε)

3222 2

1081 Vedurupaka

4475

583 ( E)

3222 3 Lolla

1081

4475

State : Andhra Pradesh .

Date 03-04-2003

15-05-2009 Date 24-11-2006

11-04-2007

Date

31-10-2007

Date

25-12-2008 03-04-2003

Date

24-11-2006

Date

11-04-2007

Date

31-10-2007

Date

25-12-2008 Date 03-04-2003

24-11-2006

Date

State : Andhra Pradesh

District : East Godavari

Mandal /Tehsil /Taluk : Anaparthi 1 Mahendravada

1081

4475 2 Ramavaram

1081

4475

583 ( Ε)

3222 Polamaru

1081 3

4475

3222 03-04-2003

Date

25-12-2008 24-11-2006

Date

25-12-2008 03-04-2003

Date

24-11-2006

Date

Date 11-04-2007

Date

31-10-2007

25-12-2008 03-04-2003

Date

24-11-2006

Date

Date 31-10-2007

State : Andhra Pradesh

District : East Godavari

Mandal /Tehsil /Taluk : Mandapeta

1081 1 Artamuru

4475

3222

1081 2 Tapeswaram

4475

583 ( Ε) 03-04-2003

Date

25-12-2008 Date

24-11-2006

31-10-2007

Date

25-12-2008 03-04-2003

Date

24-11-2006

Date

Date 11-04-2007 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1081 Ippenapadu

4475

583 ( Ε)

3222 4

1081 Palatodu

4475

583 ( Ε)

3222

2212( E) 5

1081 Velagatodu

4475

583 (Ε)

3222 6 Edida

770 Mandal/ Tehsil /Taluk : Kadiyam

770 1 Muramanda

Mandal/ Tehsil/Taluk : Alamuru 1 Madiki

770 2

770 Badugunivanilanka

2212( E) 3 Gowtami Godavari River 770 Mandal/ Tehsil /Taluk : Atreyapuram

5905

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

Date 03-04-2003

25-12-2008

Date

24-11-2006

11-04-2007

Date

Date 31-10-2007

03-04-2003

Date

05-09-2009

Date 24-11-2006

Date 11-04-2007

Date 31-10-2007

Date 28-08-2009

Date 03-04-2003

25-12-2008

Date 24-11-2006

Date 11-04-2007

Date 31-10-2007

Date 01-03-2005

25-12-2008

District : East Godavari

State : Andhra Pradesh 01-03-2005

Date

25-12-2008

District : East Godavari

State : Andhra Pradesh 01-03-2005

Date

25-12-2008

Date 01-03-2005

05-09-2009

Date 28-08-2009

Date 01-03-2005

01-11-2008

State : Andhra Pradesh

District : East Godavari

7.70 Atreyapuram

2212( E) 2 Vuchchili

770

1762 ( Ε)

3222 3 Vasantavada

770

Date

1762 ( Ε )

3222

Date

2149( E) 4

Date

770 Vasista Godavari River

Date 01-03-2005

05-09-2009

Date 28-08-2009

Date 01-03-2005

15-11-2008

Date 13-10-2006

Date 31-10-2007

01-03-2005

30-08-2009 13-10-2006

31-10-2007

18-08-2009

01-11-2008 01-03-2005

District : West Godavari

Mandal/ Tehsil / Taluk : Peravali

770

Date

Kanuru ( Zamindari )

Date

1762 ( Ε ) State : Andhra Pradesh 01-03-2005

01-11-2008

13-10-2006 5906

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ ASHVINA 11 , 1931

770 2 Kanuru ( Agraharam)

770 3 Nadupalle

1762 ( Ε)

3223 Mandal /Tehsil /Taluk : Nidadhavolu

1762 ( Ε) 1 Munipalli

[Part 11-Sec. 3 (ii ) ] 3

01-11-2008

Date 01-03-2005

20-12-2008

Date 01-03-2005

13-10-2006

Date

31-10-2007

Date

State : Andhra Pradesh

District : West Godavari

15-05-2009 13-10-2006

Date

State: Andhra Pradesh Mandal /Tehsil /Taluk : Undraja Varam District : West Godavari

1 Velivennu

1762 (Ε )

3223

2149(E)

770 2 Kaldhari

1762 ( Ε) Mandal /Tehsil /Taluk : Tadepailigudem 1 Nandamuru

1762 ( Ε)

3223

2212 (E)

770 2 Jagannadhapuram

1762 (Ε)

3223

2149(E)

2212( E)

770 3 Arugolanu

1762 (Ε)

3223

2149(E)

770 4 Kunchanapalli

1762 ( E)

3223

770 5 Kondruprolu

1762 ( Ε ) ·

3223

2149(E) Date

30-08-2009 13-10-2006

Date

31-10-2007

18-08-2009

Date

20-05-2009 01-03-2005

Date

13-10-2006

Date

State: Andhra Pradesh

District : West Godavari

05-09-2009 13-10-2006

Date

31-10-2007

Date

Date 28-08-2009

05-09-2009 01-03-2005

Date

13-10-2006

Date

31-10-2007

Date

18-08-2009

Date

28-08-2009

Date

30-08-2009 01-03-2005

Date

13-10-2006

Date

31-10-2007

Date

18-08-2009

Date

28-12-2008

Date 01-03-2005

13-10-2006

Date

31-10-2007

Date

30-08-2009

Date 01-03-2005

13-10-2006

Date

31-10-2007

Date

18-08-2009 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

5907

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

770 Tadepalle

1762 ( Ε)

3223

2212 (E)

Date

05-09-2009 01-03-2005

13-10-2006

Date

31-10-2007

Date.

28-08-2009

Date

State : Andhra Pradesh

District : West Godavari

Mandal/Tehsll/Taluk : Unguturu 1

1114 Badampudi

2078 ( Ε)

1114 Yellamilli

2078 ( E)

3223

2149( E)

2212( E) 3

1114 Unguturu

2078(Ε)

3223 4 Chebrolu

1114

3223

1114 5 Kaikaram

3223 Mandal/Tehsil/Taluk : Bhimadolu

1114 1 Pulla

2078 (Ε)

3223

2149 (E)

2212 ( E) 2

1114 Ambarpeta

2149( E)

2212 ( E)

1114 3 Bhimadolu

2078 ( Ε)

Date 21-03-2005

28-12-2008

Date 06-12-2006

Date 21-03-2005

05-09-2009 06-12-2006

Date

Date 31-10-2007

Date 18-08-2009

Date 28-08-2009

10-05-2009

Date 21-03-2005

Date 06-12-2006

31-10-2007

Date

12-05-2009

Date 21-03-2005

Date 31-10-2007

Date 21-03-2005

15-05-2009 31-10-2007

Date

District :West Godavari

State: Andhra Pr

05-09-2009 21-03-2005

Date

Date 06-12-2006

31-10-2007

Date

18-08-2009

Date

Date 28-08-2009

Date 21-03-2005

05-09-2009

Date 18-08-2009

28-08-2009

Date

21-03-2005

Date

30-08-2009 06-12-2006

Date 5908

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ASHVINΑ 11 , 1931

3223 Bhimadolu ( Contd .)

2149 ( E ) 4

1114 Surappagudem

1114 5 Gundugolanu

3223

2149(E) Mandal /Tehsil/ Taluk : Denduluru 1

1114 Singavaram

1114 Komirepalle

3223

2149( E) 3 Denduluru

1114

3223

2212( E) 4

1114 Kothagudem

1114 Uppugudem

1114 Vegavaram

1114 Kothapalli

2212(E)

1114 8 Challapalli

3223 Mandal /Tehsil / Taluk : Eluru

1 Chodimella

1116

3223 Mandal /Tehsil /Taluk : Pedavegi

1116 1 Vanguru

3223

1116 2 Jagannadhapuram

3 Pinakadimi

1116

3223

[Part 11-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

Date

31-10-2007

Date 18-08-2009

15-11-2008 21-03-2005

Date

30-08-2009 Date 21-03-2005

31-10-2007

Date

18-08-2009

Date

District : West Godavari

State : Andhra Pradesh

15-11-2008 21-03-2005

Date

30-08-2009 21-03-2005

Date

31-10-2007

Date

Date 18-08-2009

05-09-2009 21-03-2005

Date

Date 31-10-2007

Date 28-08-2009

01-11-2008

Date 21-03-2005

21-03-2005

01-11-2008

Date

21-03-2005

01-11-2008

Date

21-03-2005

05-09-2009

Date

28-08-2009

Date

01-11-2008 21-03-2005

Date

31-10-2007

Date

District : West Godavari

State : Andhra Pradesh

Date 21-03-2005

01-11-2008 31-10-2007

Date

District : West Godavari

State : Andhra Pradesh 21-03-2005

01-11-2008

Date

31-10-2007

Date

01-11-2008

Date 21-03-2005

21-03-2005

01-11-2008

Date

Date 31-10-2007 5909 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3, 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

21-03-2005

05-09-2009

1116

Date

4 Koppaka

31-10-2007

3223

Date

28-08-2009

2212(E) Date

To be published under Rule 4 of the P&MP (ARUL) Rules ,1963 , framed under Section 17 ofP & MP ( ARUL) Act,1962 in official Gazette of India .

[F. No. L- 14014/38 /2009-G.P. K.K.SHARMA, UnderSecy.

नईदिल्ली, 30 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2714.-पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) के नियम 2 (क) के अन्तर्गत , मैसर्स रिलांयस गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड ( आर.जी.टी.आई.एल. ) के द्वारा आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में प्राकृतिक गैस पाइपलाइन विछाई जाने हेतु सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कार्यों का निर्वहन करने के लिए , भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की, भारत के राजपत्र दिनांक 26 अप्रैल , 2007 को प्रकाशित, अधिसूचना का.आ. 653 (अ ) दिनांक 25 अप्रैल, 2007 द्वारा पदग्थापित, मैं, एम.ए. गफ्फार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) नियमावली ,1963 के नियम 4 के उप नियम ( 1 ) के नीचे दी गई व्याख्या ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत अधिकारों के अनुपालन में , मैसर्स आर.जी.टी.आई.एल. , जिसमें यथाग्थित, उम क्षेत्र में भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार निहित- किया गया है और उस क्षेत्र में पाइपलाइन का स्वामित्व निहित है, के परामर्श मे , संलग्न अनुसूची के स्तम्भ 4 में आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य के कृष्णा और खम्मम जिले में यथा उल्लेखित प्राकृतिक गैम पाइपलाइन विछाए जाने के प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीखों की घोपित करता हूँ ।

अनुसूची

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला : कृष्णा

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: बापुलपाडु

ग्राम का नाम

क. स .

प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख

धारा 6 (1 ) की का . आ . संख्या एवं दिनांक

1116

22-08-2008

21-03-2005

मेडिचेग्ला

दिनांक

1041

08-05-2008

दिनांक

1116

08-12-2008

21-03-2005

2 विल्लानापल्लि

दिनांक

राज्य : आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला: कृष्णा

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: नूजिविडु

1116

05-09-2009

21-03-2005

दिनांक

वांपाडु

1041

08-05-2008

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

2212(अ) 5910

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ ASHVINA 11 , 1931

1116 2 मोरसापुडि

दिनांक

1041

दिनांक

1116 3 पोलसानपल्लि

दिनांक

1763 (अ) दिनांक

1041

दिनांक

1116 4 राविचोरला

दिनांक

1041

दिनांक

[Part 11-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

21-03-2005

29-10-2008

08-05-2008

21-03-2005

29-10-2008

13-10-2006

08-05-2008

06-10-2008

21-03-2005

08-05-2008

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला: कृष्णा

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक:आगिरिपल्लि

1116 1

दिनांक

वटिगुडिपाडु

1041

दिनांक

1116 2- एडाग

दिनांक

1041

दिनांक

1116 3

दिनांक

वडलमानु

1116 4

दिनांक

मल्लिवोयिनपल्लि ( इनाम)

1116 वोडडनपल्लि

दिनांक

1763(अ) दिनांक

1041

दिनांक

2212( अ) दिनांक

05-11-2008

21-03-2005

08-05-2008

21-03-2005

07-10-2008

08-05-2008

07-10-2008

21-03-2005

23-01-2009

21-03-2005

05-09-2009

13-10-2006

08-05-2008

28-08-2009

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला: कृष्णा

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: जी. कोंड्र

635 1

दिनांक

कोडूर

1041

दिनांक

635 2

दिनांक

वेल्लाटूर

1041

दिनांक

2.212(अ) दिनांक

635 3

दिनांक

भीमावरप्पाडु

635 4 नंदिगामा

दिनांक

635 5

दिनांक

कुंटामुक्काला

1041

दिनांक

635 6

दिनांक

चेवुटूर

1041

दिनांक

635 7

दिनांक

जी. कोंडूर

1041

दिनांक

23-02-2005

19-12-2008

08-05-2008

05-09-2009

23-02-2005

08-05-2008

28-08-2009

14-10-2008

23-02-2005

14-10-2008

23-02-2005

23-01-2009

23-02-2005

08-05-2008

23-10-2008

23-02-2005

08-05-2008

23-10-2008

23-02-2005

08-05-2008 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

5911

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन11 , 1931

635 8 गङडामनगु

1041

635 9 चेरुवुमाधावरम्

635 10 मुनगापाडु

1041

635 11 सुन्नंपाडू

1041

635 12 तेल्लादेवरापाडू

2212(अ)

635 13 गंगिनेनिपालेम्

1041

2212(अ)

635 14 पेटंपाडू

635 15 दुग्गिगलापाडु

23-02-2005

23-10-2008

दिनांक

08-05-2008

दिनांक

23-02-2005

31-03-2009

दिनांक

23-02-2005

31-03-2009

दिनांक

08-05-2008

दिनांक

23-02-2005

18-08-2008

दिनांक

08-05-2008

दिनांक

23-02-2005

05-09-2009

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

23-02-2005

05-09-2009

दिनांक

08-05-2008

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

23-02-2005

13-10-2008

दिनांक

23-02-2005

12-01-2009

दिनांक

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला: कृष्णा

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: वीरुलापाडू

635 1 गुडेम माधावरम

1041

2212(अ )

635 जयंति

1041

2149(अ)

635 3 वीटुलापाडू

05-09-2009

23-02-2005

दिनांक

08-05-2008

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

23-02-2005

30-08-2009

दिनांक

08-05-2008

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

23-02-2005

13-11-2008

दिनांक

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला: कृष्णा

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: नंदिगामा

635 1 दामूलूगु

287

287 2 तांगगुडिपाडू

635 गमिरेङिडपल्लि

287 23-02-2005

07-04-2009

दिनांक

02-02-2007

दिनांक

02-02-2007

31-01-2009

दिनांक

23-02-2005

27-10-2008

दिनांक

02-02-2007

दिनांक

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला: कृष्णा

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: पेनुगंचिप्रोल

933 1

1603(अ)

933 2 अनिगंङलापाडु

21-11-2008

07-03-2005

दिनांक

25-09-2006

दिनांक

06-12-2008

07-03-2005

दिनांक 5912

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ ASHVINA 11 , 1931

933

दिनांक

पेनुगंचिपोल

1603(अ). दिनांक

1041

दिनांक

933 लिंगागूडेंम्

दिनांक

[Part 11-Sec . 3 (ii ) ] 3

07-03-2005

09-12-2008

25-09-2006

08-05-2008

07-03-2005

15-10-2008

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला: कृष्णा

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक: वत्सवायि

933 भीमावरम्

दिनांक

मक्कापेटा

933 2

दिनांक

2149(अ) दिनांक

2212(अ) दिनांक

933 गोपिनेनिपालेम्

दिनांक

933

दिनांक

मंगोल्लू

दिनांक

2212(अ)

933 5

दिनांक

देचुपालेम्

933

दिनांक

वीराभदुनिपालेम्

15-10-2008

07-03-2005

05-09-2009

18-08-2009

28-08-2009

07-03-2005

10-05-2008

05-09-2009

07-03-2005

28-08-2009

10-05-2008

07-03-2005

10-05-2008

07-03-2005

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला: कृष्णा

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक:जग्गय्यापेटा

933

दिनांक

तिरुमलागिरि

933 2

दिनांक

राामाचंदुनिपेटा

933

दिनांक

तक्केल्लापाडू

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक : मधिरा

635 1

दिनांक

287

दिनांक

10-05-2008

07-03-2005

10-05-2008

07-03-2005

10-05-2008

07-03-2005

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला:खम्मम

13-11-2008

23-02-2005

02-02-2007

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला:खम्मम

मंडल/ तेहसिल/तालुक:नेलांकोंडा पल्लि

933 1

दिनांक

कटुकाचावरम्

10-05-2008

07-03-2005

पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 की धारा 17 के अन्तर्गत संरचित पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) नियम, 1963 के नियम 4 के अन्तर्गत भारत सरकार के राजपत्र के प्रकाशनार्थ.

[फा. सं. एल-14014/39/2009-जी.पी.

के.के. शर्मा, अवर सचिव

3439G1/098 5913 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 30th September, 2009

S. O. 2714.- In pursuance of powers conferred by Explanation 1 in sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Rules , 1963 , 1 , M.A.Gaffar , appointed by Government of India, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas vide Notification S.O.653 ( E) dated 25th April , 2007 ( published in the Gazette of India on 26th April , 2007) under Section 2(a) of the Petroleum & Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962(50 of 1962) to perform the functions of Competent Authority for laying natural gas pipelines by M/ s Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited (RGTIL) in the State of Andhra Pradesh , in consultation with M/s RGTIL, to whom the Right of User in the land in that area has been vested and in whom the ownership of the pipeline in that area vests , hereby declare the dates , mentioned in Column 4 of the Schedule annexed herewith, as the dates of termination of RoU operation in Districts Krishna and Khammam in the State of Andhra Pradesh .

Schedule

District: Krishna

State: Andhra Pradesh Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk : Bapulapadu

Si . No.

Viiiage

S.O. No. and Date of Notification under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 6

Date of Termination ofOperation

Date 21-03-2005

1 Medicherla

22-08-2008

1116

Date

1041

08-05-2008

Date 21-03-2005

1116

08-12-2008

2 Billanapalli

District: Krishna

Mandai /Tehsil/Tajuk : Nuzvid

State: Andhra Pradesh

21-03-2005

1116

Date

05-09-2009

1 Vempadu

Date 08-05-2008

1041

Date 28-08-2009

2212(E)

29-10-2008

1116

Date 21-03-2005

Morsapudi

Date 08-05-2008

1041

1116

Date 21-03-2005

29-10-2008

Polasanapalli

13-10-2008

1763 (E) Date

1041

Date 08-05-2008

06-10-2008

1116

Date 21-03-2005

Ravicherala

1041

Date 08-05-2008

District: Krishna

State : Andhra Pradesh Mandai /Tehsii /Taluk : Agiripalii

Date 21-03-2005

05-11-2008

1116

1 Vattigudipadu

Date 08-05-2008

1041

07-10-2008

2 Edara

Date 21-03-2005

1116

3439৩/০

Date 08-05-2008

1041 5914

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ ASHVINA 11 , 1931

1116 Vadlamanu

1116 Malliboyinapalli ( lnam)

1116 5 Boddanapalli

1763 (E)

1041

2212( E) Mandal /Tehsil /Taluk : G.Konduru

635 1 Koduru

1041 2

635 Vellaturu

1041

2212(E) 3

635 Bhimavarappadu

635 Nandigama

635 5 Kuntamukkala

1041

635 6 Chevuturu

1041

635 7 G.Konduru

1041

635 8 Gaddamanugu

1041 9

635 Cheruvumadhavaram

635 10 Munagapadu

1041

635 11 Sunnampadu

1041

635 12 Telladevarapadu

635 13 Ganginenipalem

1041

[Part II-Scc . 3 ( ii)] 3

21-03-2005

Date

07-10-2008

Date

23-01-2009

21-03-2005

Date 21-03-2005

05-09-2009

Date 13-10-2006

Date 08-05-2008

28-08-2009

Date

District: Krishna

State: Andhra Pradesh

Date 23-02-2005

19-12-2008

Date 08-05-2008

Date 23-02-2005

05-09-2009

Date 08-05-2008

Date 28-08-2009

Date 23-02-2005

14-10-2008

Date 23-02-2005

14-10-2008

Date 23-02-2005

23-01-2009

Date 08-05-2008

23-02-2005

23-10-2008

Date

Date 08-05-2008

Date 23-02-2005

23-10-2008

Date 08-05-2008

Date 23-02-2005

23-10-2008

Date 08-05-2008

Date 23-02-2005

31-03-2009

Date 23-02-2005

Date 08-05-2008

18-08-2008

Date 23-02-2005

08-05-2008

Date

Date 23-02-2005

05-09-2009

2212(E) Date 28-08-2009

Date 23-02-2005

05-09-2009

Date 08-05-2008

2212(E) Date 28-08-2009

5915

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3, 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

635 Petrempadu

635 Duggiralapadu

23-02-2005

13-10-2008

Date

12-01-2009

Date 23-02-2005

District: Krishna

Mandal /Tehsil /Taluk : Veerulapadu

635 1 Gudemmadhavaram

.1041

2212(E) 2

635 Jayanthi

1041

2149 (E)

635 3 Veerulapadu

Mandal /Tehsii /Taluk : Nandigama

635 Damuluru

287

287 2 Torragudipadu

635 Ramireddipalli

287 Mandal /Tehsil/Taluk : Penuganchiprolu

933 1 Gummadidurru

1603 (Ε)

933 2 Anigandlapadu

933 3 Penuganchiprolu

1603 (Ε)

1041

933 4 Lingagudem

Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk : Vatsaval

933 Bhimavaram

933 2 Makkapeta

2149(E)

2212(E)

933 3 Gopinenipalem

State: Andhra Pradesh

Date 23-02-2005

05-09-2009

Date 08-05-2008

Date 28-08-2009

30-08-2009

Date 23-02-2005

Date 08-05-2008

Date 18-08-2009

13-11-2008

23-02-2005

Date

District: Krishna

State: Andhra Pradesh

Date 23-02-2005

07-04-2009

Date 02-02-2007

31-01-2009

Date 02-02-2007

23-02-2005

Date

27-10-2008

Date 02-02-2007

District : Krishna

State : Andhra Pradesh 07-03-2005

Date

21-11-2008

Date 25-09-2006

Date

06-12-2008

07-03-2005

Date

09-12-2008

07-03-2005

Date 25-09-2006

Date 08-05-2008

Date

15-10-2008

07-03-2005

District: Krishna

State:Andhra Pradesh

15-10-2008

Date 07-03-2005

05-09-2009

18-08-2009

Date

Date 28-08-2009

Date 07-03-2005

10-05-2008 5916

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 / ASHVINA 11 , 1931

933 4 Mangollu

2212( E)

933 5 Dechupalem

933 6 Virabhadrunipalem

[Part II- Sec . 3 ( ii ) ]

05-09-2009

07-03-2005

Date

Date 28-08-2009

10-05-2008

Date 07-03-2005

10-05-2008

Date 07-03-2005

District: Krishna

Mandal /Tehsil /Taluk : Jaggayapeta

933 1 Tirumalagiri

933 2 Ramachandrunipeta

933 3 Takkeliapadu

Mandal /Tehsil /Taluk : Madhira

635 1 Chilukuru

287 Mandal /Tehsil /Taluk : Nelakondapalli

933 1 Kattukachavaram

State: Andhra Pradesh

10-05-2008

Date 07-03-2005

10-05-2008

Date 07-03-2005

10-05-2008 Date 07-03-2005

State : Andhra Pradesh

District : Khammam

13-11-2008 Date 23-02-2005

02-02-2007

Date

State: Andhra Pradesh

District: Khammam

10-05-2008 Date 07-03-2005

To be published under Rule 4 of the P&MP (ARUL) Rules,1963, framed under Section 17 ofP &MP ( ARUL ) Act , 1962 in official Gazette of India.

[F. No. L - 14014/39/2009-G.P. K.K.SHARMA , UnderSecy.

नई दिल्ली , 30 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2715- पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) के नियम 2 (क) के अन्तर्गत , मैसर्स रिलांयस गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड (आर.जी.टी.आई.एल. ) के द्वारा आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य में प्राकृतिक गैस पाइपलाइन विछाई जाने हेतु सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कार्यो का निर्वहन करने के लिए, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की, भारत के राजपत्र दिनांक 29 अक्तूबर , 2005 को प्रकाशित, अधिसूचना का. आ . 3962 दिनांक 25 अक्तूबर, 2005 द्वारा पदस्थापित, मैं, पी. वुच्चा रेड्डी, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) नियमावली , 1963 के नियम 4 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के नीचे दी गई व्याख्या ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत अधिकारों के अनुपालन में , मैसर्स आर.जी.टी.आई.एल. , जिसमें यथास्थित, उस क्षेत्र में भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार निहित किया गया है और उस क्षेत्र में पाइपलाइन का स्वामित्व निहित है , के परामर्श से , संलग्न अनुसूची के स्तम्भ 4 में आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य के नलगोंडा, रंगारेड्डी और मेदक जिले में यथा उल्लेखित प्राकृतिक गैस पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीखों की घोषित करता हूँ । [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

अनुसूची

5917

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/ आश्विन11 , 1931

'जिलाः नलगोंडा

मंडलः कोदाड

क . स .

ग्राम का नाम

933 1 चिमिर्याल

2842(अ)

2212(अ) 2

933 गंडियाल

933 3 तम्मरबंडापालेम्

2842(अ) 4

933 अनंतगिरि

1603(अ)

2842(अ) 5

933 खानापूर

2842(अ)

2212(अ)

933 6 कोम्मराबंन्डा

2212(अ)

राज्यः आन्ध्र प्रदेश

प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख

धारा 6 (1 ) की का . आ. संख्या एवं दिनांक

05-09-2009

दिनांक 07-03-2005

02-12-2008

दिनांक

दिनांक 28-08-2009

30-06-2008

07-03-2005

दिनांक

10-12-2008

07-03-2005

दिनांक

02-12-2008

दिनांक

17-12-2008 07-03-2005

दिनांक

25-09-2006

दिनांक

02-12-2008

दिनांक

05-09-2009

दिनांक 07-03-2005

02-12-2008

दिनांक

दिनांक 28-08-2009

05-09-2009

07-03-2005

दिनांक

दिनांक 28-08-2009

जिलाः नलगोंडा

मंडलः नडिगूडेम्

933 1 सिंगवरम्

933 2 तेल्लबल्लि

933 याक्लासकानपेटा

2212(अ) 4

933 रामापुरम

2842(अ)

933 5 नडिगूडेम्

2842(अ)

राज्या आन्ध्र प्रदेश

03-07-2008

07-03-2005

दिनांक

17-05-2008

07-03-2005

दिनांक

05-09-2009 07-03-2005

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

13-12-2008 07-03-2005

दिनांक

02-12-2008

दिनांक

13-12-2008 07-03-2005

दिनांक

02-12-2008

दिनांक

जिलाः नलगोंडा

मंडलः मुनगाला

3031 मुनगाला

2212(अ)

राज्यःआन्ध्र प्रदेश

05-09-2009 16-11-2004

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक 5918

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ASHVINA 11 , 1931

3031 कलकोवा

2212(अ)

3031 3 रेपाला

2842(अ)

[Part 11- Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

05-09-2009

दिनांक 16-11-2004

28-08-2009

दिनांक

13-12-2008

16-11-2004

दिनांक

02-12-2008

दिनांक

'जिलाः नलगोंडा

मंडला मोते

3031 1 नामावरम्

2798

2842(अ) मंडलः चिव्वेमला

राज्यः आन्ध्र प्रदेश

13-12-2008

दिनांक 16-11-2004

दिनांक 20-07-2006

02-12-2008

दिनांक

'जिलाः नलगोंडा

3031 तिम्मपुरम्

2842(अ)

3031 2 चिव्वेमला

2842(अ)

2212(अ)

3031 3 वट्टिखम्ममपाहाड

2842(अ)

2212(अ)

3031 4 विवीगुडेम

3031 5 कुडकुडा

राज्यः आन्ध्र प्रदेश

19-12-2008 दिनांक 16-11-2004

दिनांक 02-12-2008

05-09-2009 दिनांक 16-11-2004

दिनांक 02-12-2008

दिनांक 28-08-2009

05-09-2009 दिनांक 16-11-2004

दिनांक 02-12-2008

28-08-2009

दिनांक

19-03-2008 16-11-2004

दिनांक

05-09-2009 दिनांक 16-11-2004

02-12-2008

2842(अ) दिनांक

2212(अ) 28-08-2009

दिनांक

'जिलाः नलगोंडा

मंडलः सूयपिट

3031 1 पिल्ललमरि

3031 2 रामन्नागुडेम्

2842(अ)

3031 3 पिन्नय्यापालेम्

2842(अ)

3031 4 वेंकटरामपुरम्

2798

3031 5 यंडलापल्लि

राज्यः आन्ध्र प्रदेश

19-03-2008 16-11-2004

दिनांक

19-12-2008 16-11-2004

दिनांक

दिनांक 02-12-2008

19-12-2008 16-11-2004

दिनांक

02-12-2008

दिनांक

26-04-2008 16-11-2004

दिनांक

दिनांक 20-07-2006

26-04-2008 दिनांक 16-11-2004 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

5919

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/ आश्विन 11 , 1931

'जिलाঃ नलगोंडा

मंडलः केतेपस्लि

3031 1 कासनगूडा

2842(अ)

3031 गुडिवाडा

2842(अ)

2212(अ)

राज्यः आन्ध्र प्रदेश

26-12-2008

दिनांक 16-11-2004

दिनांक 02-12-2008

05-09-2009

16-11-2004

दिनांक

दिनांक 02-12-2008

दिनांक 28-08-2009

'जिलाः नलगोंडा

मंडलः नकिरेकल

1115 1 पालेम

2842(अ)

राज्यः आन्ध्र प्रदेश

26-12-2008

21-03-2005

दिनांक

02-12-2008

दिनांक

'जिलाः नलगोंडा

मंडलः शालिगौरारम्

1115 पेरकाकोंन्डारम्

2842(अ)

2212(अ) 2

1115 अड्लूर

2842(अ) 3

1115 आकवरम्

1115 वदिदपामुला

1115 5 तक्केल्लापहाड्

1115 6 भैरुनीबंडा

2842(अ)

2212(अ)

राज्यः आन्ध्र प्रदेश

05-09-2009

21-03-2005

दिनांक

दिनांक 02-12-2008

दिनांक 28-08-2009

26-12-2008

दिनांक 21-03-2005

दिनांक 02-12-2008

21-04-2008

21-03-2005

दिनांक

21-04-2008

दिनांक 21-03-2005

21-04-2008

21-03-2005

दिनांक

05-09-2009

21-03-2005

दिनांक

दिनांक 02-12-2008

28-08-2009

दिनांक

जिलाः नलगोंडा

मंडलः नारकेटपल्लि

1115 1 अम्मनाबोलू

2212(अ)

राज्यः आन्ध्र प्रदेश

05-09-2009

दिनांक 21-03-2005

दिनांक 28-08-2009

जिलाः नलगोंडा

मंडलः रामन्नापेटा

1115 1 कुंकुडुपामुला

1115 येन्नावरम्

2842(अ)

1115 3 सूरारम्

1115 4 बच्चुप्पल

राज्यःआन्ध्र प्रदेश

28-04-2006

दिनांक 21-03-2005

26-12-2008

21-03-2005

दिनांक

02-12-2008

दिनांक

28-04-2008

21-03-2005

दिनांक

21-03-2005

28-04-2008

दिनांक 5920

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ ASHVINA 11 , 1931

1115 5 पल्लेवाडा

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii ) ]

28-04-2008

दिनांक 21-03-2005

जिलाः नलगोंडा

मंडलः आत्माकूर

1115 1 दूपल्लि

राज्यः आन्ध्र प्रदेश

04-05-2008

दिनांक 21-03-2005

राज्यः आन्ध्र प्रदेश

'जिलाः नलगोंडा

मंडलः वोलिगोंडा

1115 वेमुलाकोंडा

2842(अ)

1115 चित्तापूर

1115 3 वेंकटापुरम्

1115 4 गंगापूर

1115 5. आरूर

1115 8 येलुवरती

2842(अ)

1115 7 सुंकिशाला

1115 8 पुल्गुल् अलियास पुलिगिल्ला

1115 9 कंचनापल्लि

1115 10. पहिल्वानपूर

2842(अ)

10-12-2008

21-03-2005

दिनांक

02-12-2008

दिनांक

24-05-2008

दिनांक 21-03-2005

10-05-2008

21-03-2005

दिनांक

14-05-2008

21-03-2005

दिनांक

14-05-2008

दिनांक 21-03-2005

18-12-2008

21-03-2005

दिनांक

02-12-2008

दिनांक

18-05-2008

21-03-2005

दिनांक

24-05-2008

21-03-2005

दिनांक

24-05-2008

21-03-2005

दिनांक

24-12-2008

21-03-2005

दिनांक

02-12-2008

दिनांक

राज्यःआन्ध्र प्रदेश

'जिलाः नलगोंडा

मंडलः भुवनगिरि

934 1 येररंबल्लि

2842(अ) 2

934 नवाजपल्लि

934 तुक्कापूर

1764(अ)

934 4 भुवनगिरि

1784(अ) 5 बोम्माईपल्लि

1764(अ)

934 6 अनंतवरम

2842(अ)

2212(अ)

934 7 ताजपुर

24-12-2008 दिनांक 07-03-2005

02-12-2008

दिनांक

24-05-2008 दिनांक 07-03-2005

24-05-2008 07-03-2005

दिनांक

13-10-2006

दिनांक

25-05-2008 07-03-2005

दिनांक

13-10-2006

दिनांक

25-05-2008 13-10-2006

दिनांक

05-09-2009 07-03-2005

दिनांक

02-12-2008

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

25-05-2008 07-03-2005

दिनांक 5921

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

जिलाः नलगोंडा

मंडलः बोम्मलरामारम्

934

दिनांक

1 मेडिपल्लि

934

दिनांक

2 मैलारम

दिनांक

2842(अ)

934 3 हाजीपूर

934 मासिरेड्डिपल्लि

934 5 मल्याला

2212(अ)

934 6 बोम्मलरामारम्

2212(अ) 7

934 तूमकुन्टा

2842(अ)

राज्यःआन्ध्र प्रदेश

22-05-2008

07-03-2005

28-12-2008

07-03-2005

02-12-2008

23-05-2008

07-03-2005

दिनांक

23-05-2008

07-03-2005

दिनांक

05-09-2009

07-03-2005

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

05-09-2009

07-03-2005

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

28-12-2008

07-03-2005

दिनांक

02-12-2008

दिनांक

राज्यः आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला रंगारेड्डी

मंडलः शामीरपेट

934 1 उद्वामरिर

2149(अ)

2212(अ)

934 2 याकूतपूर

2212(अ) 3 रुद्रासिपल्लि अलियास आद्रासिपल्लि 934

2149(अ)

2212(अ)

934 4 पोन्नाल

2149(अ)

2212(अ) 5

934 बोम्रासपेट

2149(अ)

2212(अ)

934 6 शामीरपेट

1764(अ)

2149(अ)

2212(अ)

05-09-2009

07-03-2005

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

05-09-2009

07-03-2005

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

05-09-2009

07-03-2005

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

05-09-2009

07-03-2005

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

05-09-2009

07-03-2005

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

05-09-2009 07-03-2005

दिनांक

13-10-2006

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक 5922

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ASHVINA 11 , 1931

मंडलः मेड्चल

[ Part Il- Sec . 3 ( ii )] 3

राज्यः आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिलाः रंगारेड्डी

934 पूडूर

2149(अ)

2212(अ) 2

934 गोसाईगूडा

2149(अ)

2212(अ) 3

934 मेड्चल

05-09-2009

दिनांक 07-03-2005

दिनांक 18-08-2009

28-08-2009

दिनांक

05-09-2009

07-03-2005

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

05-09-2009

दिनांक 07-03-2005

13-10-2006

दिनांक

1764(अ)

2149(अ)

2212(अ) 4

934 गौडावेल्लि

2149(अ)

2212(अ)

934 5 गिरमापुर

934 रायालापूर

18-08-2009

दिनांक

दिनांक 28-08-2009

07-03-2005

05-09-2009 दिनांक

दिनांक 18-08-2009

28-08-2009

दिनांक

17-07-2008

दिनांक 07-03-2005

19-07-2008 दिनांक 07-03-2005

'जिलाः रंगारेड्डी

मंडलः खुत्बुल्लापूर

628 1 दुडिगल

934

1764(अ)

531 (अ)

2149(अ)

2212(अ)

2067 2 गागिलापूर

628

1764(अ)

2212(अ) मंडलः मरपल्लि

2067 1 बिलकल

2149(अ)

राज्यः आन्ध्र प्रदेश 17-02-2003

दिनांक

05-09-2009 दिनांक 07-03-2005

13-10-2006

दिनांक

30-03-2007

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

05-09-2009 दिनांक 19-06-2002

दिनांक 17-02-2003

13-10-2006

दिनांक

दिनांक 28-08-2009

राज्यः आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिलाः रंगारेड्डी

दिनांक 19-06-2002

30-08-2009 दिनांक 18-08-2009 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2067 2 कामसेटिपल्लि

628

2149(अ)

2212(अ)

2067 3 मोगिलिगुण्ड्ला

628

2149(अ)

2212(अ)

2067 4 धनापूर

628

4474

2149(अ)

2212(अ)

5923

05-09-2009

19-06-2002

दिनांक

17-02-2003

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

05-09-2009 19-06-2002

दिनांक

17-02-2003

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

दिनांक 28-08-2009

05-09-2009 19-06-2002

दिनांक

17-02-2003

दिनांक

20-11-2006

दिनांक

18-08-2009

दिनांक

दिनांक 28-08-2009

राज्यः आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिलाः मेवक

मंडलः जिन्नारम

2125 1 अलीनगर

288

2125 2 गाडिपोतारम

218

288

2905(अ)

2125 3 किष्टायपल्लि

288

2905(अ)

2125 4 कोरलाकुन्टा

4581

2905(अ)

2125 5 नल्तूरु

4581

2905 (अ)

16-07-2008 25-06-2002

दिनांक

02-02-2007

दिनांक

19-12-2008 25-06-2002

दिनांक

16-01-2003

दिनांक

दिनांक 02-02-2007

15-12-2008

दिनांक

25-12-2008 दिनांक 25-06-2002

02-02-2007

दिनांक

15-12-2008

दिनांक

25-12-2008 25-06-2002

दिनांक

29-11-2006

दिनांक

15-12-2008

दिनांक

25-12-2008 25-06-2002

दिनांक

29-11-2006

दिनांक

15-12-2008

दिनांक 5924

2 1

6 माधवरमु

7 कोडाकंची

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii) ]

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ ASHVINA 11 , 1931

25-12-2008 2125

दिनांक 25-06-2002

218

दिनांक 16-01-2003

4581

दिनांक 29-11-2006

15-12-2008

दिनांक

2905 (अ)

05-09-2009 2125

25-06-2002

दिनांक

218

दिनांक 16-01-2003

15-12-2008

दिनांक

2905 (अ)

28-08-2009

दिनांक

2212(अ)

'जिलाः मेदक

मंडलः पठानचेरूवु

1 पेद्धकंजर्ला

2 इंदिरेशम

3 ऐनोल

4 चितुकुला

5 लकडारम

6 रूद्रवरम

मंडलः संगारेड्डी

1 चेर्याल

2 कन्दी

राज्यःआन्ध्र प्रदेश 218

25-12-2008 दिनांक 16-01-2003

दिनांक 15-12-2008

2905 (अ)

2125

25-07-2008 दिनांक 25-06-2002

25-12-2008 2125

दिनांक 25-06-2002

4581

दिनांक 29-11-2006

दिनांक 15-12-2008

2905 (अ)

25-12-2008 218

16-01-2003

दिनांक

दिनांक 15-12-2008

2905 (अ)

2125

25-12-2008 दिनांक 25-06-2002

दिनांक 15-12-2008

2905(अ)

2125

05-09-2009 दिनांक 25-06-2002

218

दिनांक 16-01-2003

15-12-2008

दिनांक

2905 (अ)

दिनांक 28-08-2009

2212(अ)

जिलाः मेदक

राज्यः आन्ध्र प्रदेश 2125

05-09-2009 दिनांक 25-06-2002

218

16-01-2003

दिनांक

15-12-2008

दिनांक

2905 (अ)

28-08-2009

दिनांक

2212(अ)

2125

10-07-2008 दिनांक 25-06-2002 5925 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3, 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

05-09-2009

2125

25-06-2002

दिनांक

कोतलापूर

218

16-01-2003

दिनांक

02-02-2007

288

दिनांक

दिनांक 15-12-2008

2905 (अ)

दिनांक 28-08-2009

2212(अ)

25-12-2008 4

2125

दिनांक 25-06-2002

पोतिरेड्डीपल्ली

दिनांक 15-12-2008

2905(अ)

'जिलाः मेदक

राज्यःआन्ध्र प्रदेश मंडलः कोण्डापूर

25-12-2008

2125.

दिनांक 25-06-2002

1 मल्कापूर

218

दिनांक 16-01-2003

288

दिनांक 02-02-2007

दिनांक 15-12-2008

2905 (अ)

25-12-2008

2125

दिनांक 25-06-2002

2 तोगरपल्ली

218

दिनांक 16-01-2003

4581

दिनांक 29-11-2006

दिनांक 15-12-2008

2905(अ)

25-12-2008

2125

दिनांक 25-06-2002

3 गिर्मापूर

दिनांक 15-12-2008

2905(अ)

05-09-2009

2125

दिनांक 25-06-2002

4 गारकुर्ति

दिनांक 15-12-2008

2905 (अ)

4581

दिनांक 29-11-2006

दिनांक 28-08-2009

2212(अ)

जिला मेदक

राज्यः आन्ध्र प्रदेश मंडलः सदाशिवपेट

20-04-2009

2126

दिनांक 25-06-2002

1 पेद्धापूर.

दिनांक 15-12-2008

2905 (अ)

दिनांक 08-04-2009

949(अ)

10-07-2008

2126

दिनांक 25-06-2002

2 नन्दिकन्दि

2126

25-12-2008

दिनांक 25-06-2002

3 सिद्दापूर

4339

10-11-2006

दिनांक

15-12-2008

दिनांक

2905 (अ) 5926

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ ASHVINA 11 , 1931

2126 सदाशिवपेट

2905(अ)

2126 5 मद्धिकुन्टा

2905(अ)

949(अ) 6

2126 तंगेडपल्ली

2905 (अ)

949(अ)

2126 7 मिलिगिरिपेट

4339

949(अ)

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] 3

25-12-2008

दिनांक 25-06-2002

15-12-2008

दिनांक

20-04-2009

दिनांक 25-06-2002

15-12-2008

दिनांक

08-04-2009

दिनांक

20-04-2009 दिनांक 25-06-2002

दिनांक 15-12-2008

दिनांक 08-04-2009

20-04-2009 दिनांक 25-06-2002

दिनांक 10-11-2006

दिनांक 08-04-2009

'जिलाः मेदक

मंडलः मुनिपल्लि

2126 1 इब्राहीमपूर

4339

2905 (अ)

949(अ)

2126 2 कामकोल

4339

राज्यः आन्ध्र प्रदेश

20-04-2009 दिनांक 25-06-2002

10-11-2006

दिनांक

15-12-2008

दिनांक

08-04-2009

दिनांक

10-07-2008 25-06-2002

दिनांक

10-11-2006

दिनांक

'जिलाः मेदक

मंडलः कोहीर

2126 1 वेंकाटापूर

2905 (अ)

2126 2 कावेली

2905(अ)

949(अ)

2212(अ)

2126 3 गुरुजवाडा

4339

2905(अ)

2126 4 माद्री

2905 (अ)

949(अ)

2212(अ)

राज्यःआन्ध्र प्रदेश

20-12-2008 25-06-2002

दिनांक

दिनांक 15-12-2008

05-09-2009 दिनांक 25-06-2002

15-12-2008

दिनांक

08-04-2009

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक

25-12-2008 25-06-2002

दिनांक

10-11-2006

दिनांक

15-12-2008

दिनांक

05-09-2009 25-06-2002

दिनांक

15-12-2008

दिनांक

08-04-2009

दिनांक

28-08-2009

दिनांक [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

5927

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

मंडलः जहीराबाद

'जिलाः मेदक

2126 1 हुग्गेल्ली

4339

2905(अ) 2

2126 रन्जोल

2905(अ)

949(अ)

934 3 होथी (खुर्द)

2126

4339

949(अ)

934 4 होथी(बुजरुग)

2126

1341

2905(अ)

2212(अ) 5

934 कासीमपूर

2905(अ)

2212(अ)

934 6 सत्वार

2905 (अ) 7

934 चिराग पल्लि

राज्यःआन्ध्र प्रदेश

25-12-2008

25-06-2002

दिनांक

10-11-2006

दिनांक

15-12-2008

दिनांक

20-04-2009

25-06-2002

दिनांक

15-12-2008

दिनांक

दिनांक 08-04-2009

20-04-2009

07-03-2005

दिनांक

दिनांक 25-06-2002

10-11-2006

दिनांक

08-04-2009

दिनांक

05-09-2009

दिनांक 07-03-2005

25-06-2002

दिनांक

दिनांक 30-04-2003

दिनांक 15-12-2008

दिनांक 28-08-2009

05-09-2009

07-03-2005

दिनांक

15-12-2008

दिनांक

दिनांक 28-08-2009

20-12-2008

दिनांक 07-03-2005

15-12-2008

दिनांक

20-12-2008

दिनांक 07-03-2005

पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्ज न) अधिनियम, 1962 की धारा 17 के अन्तर्गत संरचित पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) नियम, 1963 के नियम 4 के अन्तर्गत भारतसरकार के राजपत्र के प्रकाशनार्थ .

[फा. सं. एल-14014/40/2009-जी.पी .

के.के. शर्मा, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 30th September, 2009

S. O. 2715. In pursuance of powers conferred by Explanation 1 in sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Rules , 1963 , I, P. Butcha Reddy, appointedby Government of India, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas vide Notification S.0.3962 dated 25th October, 2005 (published in the Gazette of India on 25th October , 2005) under Section 2(a) of the Petroleum & Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962(50 of 1962) to perform the functions of Competent Authority for laying natural gas pipelines by M/s Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited (RGTIL) in the State of Andhra Pradesh, in consultation with M/s RGTIL , to whom 5928

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ASHVINA 11 , 1931 .

the Right of User in the land in that area has been vested and in whom the ownership of the pipeline in that area vests , hereby declare the dates, mentioned in Column 4 of the Schedule annexed herewith, as the dates of termination of RoU operation in Districts Nalgonda, Rangareddy and Medak in the State of Andhra Pradesh .

Schedule

Mandal : Kodad

State: Andhra Pradesh

District: Nalgonda

Sl. No.

Village

933 Chimiriyal

2842(E)

2212(Ε)

933 2 Gandriyal

933 3 Tammar Banda Palem

2842( Ε)

933 4 Ananthagiri

1603 (E)

2842(Ε)

933 5 Khanapur

2842( Ε)

2212( Ε) 6 KommarBanda

933

2212( Ε) Mandal : Nadigudem

S.O. No. and Date of Notification under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 6

Date of Termination ofOperation

07-03-2005

05-09-2009

Dated

02-12-2008

Dated

28-08-2009

Dated

30-06-2008

Dated 07-03-2005

10-12-2008

Dated 07-03-2005

02-12-2008

Dated

Dated 07-03-2005

17-12-2008

25-09-2006

Dated

02-12-2008

Dated

07-03-2005

05-09-2009

Dated

02-12-2008

Dated

28-08-2009

Dated

05-09-2009 Dated 07-03-2005

28-08-2009

Dated

State: Andhra Pradesh

District: Nalgonda

933 1 Singavaram

2 Tellaballi

933 3

933 Yakhlaskanpeta

2212( E) 4

933 Ramapuram

2842( Ε)

933 5 Nadigudem

2842( Ε) Mandal : Munagala

07-03-2005

03-07-2008 Dated

07-03-2005

17-05-2008 Dated

07-03-2005

Dated

05-09-2009 Dated 28-08-2009

13-12-2008 07-03-2005

Dated

02-12-2008

Dated

13-12-2008 07-03-2005

Dated

Dated 02-12-2008

State: Andhra Pradesh

District: Nalgonda

3031 Munagala

2212( Ε) 16-11-2004

05-09-2009 Dated

Dated 28-08-2009 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

3031 Kalakova

2212(E)

3031 3 Repala

5929

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

05-09-2009

Dated 16-11-2004

Dated 28-08-2009

13-12-2008

Dated 16-11-2004

02-12-2008

2842(E) Dated

Mandal : Mothey

State: Andhra Pradesh

District: Nalgonda

1 Namavaram

3031

2798

2842(Ε) Mandal : Chivemla

13-12-2008

Dated 16-11-2004

20-07-2006

Dated

Dated 02-12-2008

State: Andhra Pradesh

District: Nalgonda

3031 Timmapuram

2842(Ε) 2

3031 Chivemla

2842( Ε)

2212(E)

3031 3 Vattikhammampahad

2842( E)

2212(E) 4

3031 Bibigudem

5 Kudkuda

3031

2842(Ε)

2212(E)

19-12-2008

Dated 16-11-2004

02-12-2008

Dated

16-11-2004

Dated

05-09-2009

Dated 02-12-2008

28-08-2009

Dated

05-09-2009

Dated 16-11-2004

02-12-2008

Dated

28-08-2009

Dated

16-11-2004

19-03-2008

Dated

16-11-2004

05-09-2009

Dated

02-12-2008

Dated

28-08-2009

Dated

State : Andhra Pradesh

District: Nalgonda

Mandal : Suryapeta

3031 Pillalamarry

3031 Ramannagudem

2842(Ε) 3

3031 Pinnaipalem

2842(E) 4

3031 Venkatramapuram

2798

3031 5 Yendlapalli

3439 GI/09-11

19-03-2008

Dated 16-11-2004

19-12-2008

16-11-2004

Dated

Dated 02-12-2008

19-12-2008

16-11-2004

Dated

02-12-2008

Dated

26-04-2008

16-11-2004

Dated

Dated 20-07-2006

26-04-2008

16-11-2004

Dated 5930

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 / ASHVINA 11 , 1931

Mandal : Kethepalli

3031 1 Kasangooda

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii )] 3

State : Andhra Pradesh

District: Nalgonda

Dated 16-11-2004

26-12-2008 02-12-2008

2842(Ε) Dated

2 Gudivada

3031

2842 (E)

2212(E) Mandal : Nakrekal

1 Palem

1115

2842( Ε) Mandal : Shallgowraram

1 Perkakondaram

1115

2842( Ε)

2212(E) 2 Adloor

1115

2842( E)

1115 3 Akkavaram

1115 Vaddipamula

1115 Takkelapahad

1115 6. Baironibanda

2842( Ε)

2212( Ε) Mandal : Narketpally

1115 1 Ammanbolu

2212(Ε) Mandal : Ramannapet

1115 Kunkudupamula

1115 2 Yennavaram

2842( E) 3 Suraram

1115 4

1115 Bachuppala

Dated 16-11-2004

05-09-2009 Dated 02-12-2008

Dated 28-08-2009

State: Andhra Pradesh

District: Nalgonda

26-12-2008 Dated 21-03-2005

02-12-2008

Dated

State: Andhra Pradesh

District: Nalgonda

Dated

05-09-2009 21-03-2005

02-12-2008

Dated

Dated 28-08-2009

26-12-2008 21-03-2005

Dated

Dated 02-12-2008

Dated 21-03-2005

21-04-2008

21-04-2008 Dated 21-03-2005

Dated 21-03-2005

05-09-2009 02-12-2008

Dated

Dated 28-08-2009

State : Andhra Pradesh

District: Nalgonda

Dated 21-03-2005

05-09-2009 28-08-2009

Dated

State : Andhra Pradesh

District: Nalgonda

Dated 21-03-2005

28-04-2008 21-03-2005

Dated

26-12-2008 02-12-2008

Dated

21-03-2005

Dated

28-04-2008

28-04-2008 Dated 21-03-2005 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

5931

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

1115

Dated

5 Pallevada

Mandal : Atmakur

21-03-2005

28-04-2008

State : Andhra Pradesh

District: Naigonda

1115 1 Dupalli

04-05-2008

Dated 21-03-2005

State: Andhra Pradesh

District: Naigonda

Mandal : Voligonda

1115 1 Vemulakonda

2842(E) 2

1115 Chithapur

1115 Venkatapuram

1115 4 Gangapur

1115 5 Aroor

1115 6 Veluvarthy

2842(E)

1115 7 Sunkishala

1115 8 Pulgul alias Pullgilla

1115 Kanchanaplli

1115 Pahelwanpur

2842(Ε) 21-03-2005

Dated

10-12-2008

02-12-2008

Dated

24-05-2008

21-03-2005

Dated

21-03-2005

10-05-2008

Dated

21-03-2005

14-05-2008

Dated

Dated 21-03-2005

14-05-2008

21-03-2005

18-12-2008

Dated

02-12-2008

Dated

18-05-2008

21-03-2005

Dated

24-05-2008

21-03-2005

Dated

21-03-2005

24-05-2008

Dated

21-03-2005

24-12-2008

Dated

02-12-2008

Dated

State: Andhra Pradesh

District : Nalgonda

Mandal : Bhuvanagiri

934 1 Yerrambelli

2842(Ε)

934 2 Navajpalli

934 3 Thukkapur

1764(Ε)

934 4 Bhuvanagiri

1764(Ε)

1764(E) 5 Bommaipalli

934 6 Ananthavaram

2842(E)

2212(E)

934 7 Tajpur

Mandal : Bommalaramaram

24-12-2008

07-03-2005

Dated

02-12-2008

Dated

24-05-2008

Dated 07-03-2005

24-05-2008

Dated 07-03-2005

13-10-2006

Dated

25-05-2008

Dated 07-03-2005

13-10-2006

Dated

25-05-2008

13-10-2006

Dated

05-09-2009

Dated 07-03-2005

02-12-2008

Dated

Dated 28-08-2009

25-05-2008

Dated 07-03-2005

State: Andhra Prades!

District: Nalgonda

934 1 Medipalli

934 2 Mylaram

2842(E)

22-05-2008

07-03-2005

Dated

28-12-1008 07-03-2005

Dated

Dated 02-12-2008 5932

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ ASHVINA 11 , 1931

934 Hajipur

934 Masireddypalli

934 Malyala

2212( Ε)

934 6 Bommalaramaram

2212(E)

934 7 Thoomkunta

2842(E) Mandal : Shameerpet

[Part II-Sec. 3 (ii ) ] 3

07-03-2005

23-05-2008

Dated

07-03-2005

Dated

23-05-2008

Dated 07-03-2005

05-09-2009

28-08-2009

Dated

07-03-2005

Dated

05-09-2009

28-08-2009

Dated

28-12-2008 Dated 07-03-2005

Dated 02-12-2008

State: Andhra Pradesh

District: Rangareddy

934 1 Uddamarri

2149 (Ε)

2212(Ε)

934 2 Yakhutpur

2212( E) 3 Rudrasipalli alias Adrajipalli 934

2149 (Ε)

2212(E) 4

934 Ponnal

2149(Ε)

2212(Ε)

934 5 Bomaraspet

2149 ( Ε)

2212( Ε)

934 6 Shameerpet

07-03-2005

Dated

05-09-2009 Dated 18-08-2009

28-08-2009

Dated

07-03-2005

05-09-2009 Dated

28-08-2009

Dated

07-03-2005

05-09-2009 Dated

18-08-2009

Dated

28-08-2009

Dated

07-03-2005

Dated

05-09-2009 Dated 18-08-2009

28-08-2009

Dated

07-03-2005

05-09-2009 Dated

18-08-2009

Dated

28-08-2009

Dated

07-03-2005

Dated

05-09-2009

1764(Ε) Dated 13-10-2006

2149 (Ε)

2212( Ε) Mandal : Medchal

Dated 18-08-2009

Dated 28-08-2009

State:Andhra Pradesh

District: Rangareddy

934 1 Pudur

2149 (Ε)

2212( Ε)

934 2 Gosaiguda

2149 ( Ε) Dated 07-03-2005

05-09-2009 18-08-2009

Dated

28-08-2009

Dated

07-03-2005

Dated

05-09-2009 18-08-2009

Dated

28-08-2009

2212(E) Dated

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

5933

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

934 3 Medchal

1764(Ε)

2149 (Ε)

2212(Ε)

934 4 Goudavelly

2149 ( Ε)

2212( Ε)

934 5 Girmapur

934 6 Railapur

07-03-2005

05-09-2009

Dated

13-10-2006

Dated

18-08-2009

Dated

28-08-2009

Dated

Dated 07-03-2005

05-09-2009

18-08-2009

Dated

28-08-2009

Dated

17-07-2008

Dated 07-03-2005

19-07-2008

07-03-2005

Dated

State : Andhra Pradesh

District: Rangareddy

Mandal : Qutbullapur

628 1 Dundigal

934

1764( Ε)

531 (Ε)

2149 (Ε)

2212(E)

2067 2 Gagilapur

628

1764(Ε)

2212(Ε) 17-02-2003

05-09-2009

Dated

07-03-2005

Dated

13-10-2006

Dated

30-03-2007

Dated

18-08-2009

Dated

28-08-2009

Dated

05-09-2009

Dated 19-06-2002

Dated 17-02-2003

13-10-2006

Dated

28-08-2009

Dated

State : Andhra Pradesh

District: Rangareddy

Mandai : Marpalll

2067 1 Bilkal

2149 (Ε)

2067 2 Kamsettipalli

628

2149 (Ε)

2212(Ε)

2067 3 Mogiligundla

628

2149(E) 19-06-2002

30-08-2009

Dated

18-08-2009

Dated

05-09-2009

19-06-2002

Dated

17-02-2003

Dated

18-08-2009

Dated

28-08-2009

Dated

05-09-2009

19-06-2002

Dated

17-02-2003

Dated

18-08-2009

Dated

(E) Dated 28-08-2009

2212

2067 4 Ghanapur

628

4474

05-09-2009

19-06-2002

Dated

17-02-2003

Dated

Dated 20-11-2006 5934

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ASHVINA 11 , 1931

2149 (E)

2212( Ε) Mandal : Jinnaram

2125 Allinagar

288 2

2125 Gadipotharam

218

288

2905(E)

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii) ] 3

18-08-2009

Dated

28-08-2009

Dated

District: Medak

State : Andhra Pradesh 25-06-2002

Dated

16-07-2008

Dated 02-02-2007

25-06-2002

Dated

19-12-2008

16-01-2003

Dated

02-02-2007

Dated

Dated 15-12-2008

2125 Kistaipalli

288

2905 ( Ε) 4

2125 Korlakunta

4581

2905 ( Ε) 5 Naltoor

2125

4581

2905( Ε) 6

2125 Madhavaram

218

4581

2905 ( Ε )

2125 Kodakanchi

218 25-06-2002

Dated

25-12-2008

Dated 02-02-2007

15-12-2008

Dated

Dated 25-06-2002

25-12-2008

Dated 29-11-2006

15-12-2008

Dated

25-12-2008

Dated 25-06-2002

Dated 29-11-2006

15-12-2008

Dated

25-06-2002

25-12-2008

Dated

16-01-2003

Dated

29-11-2006

Dated

15-12-2008

Dated

05-09-2009

25-06-2002

Dated

16-01-2003

Dated

Dated 15-12-2008

2905( Ε)

2212 ( E) Patancheruvu

28-08-2009

Dated

District: Medak

Mandal :

218 1 Peddakanjarla

2905 ( Ε) 2 Indresham

2125

2125 3 Inole

4581

2905 ( Ε)

218 4 Chitukula

2905(Ε)

State: Andhra Pradesh

25-12-2008

Dated 16-01-2003

Dated 15-12-2008

25-06-2002

25-07-2008

Dated

25-12-2008

25-06-2002

Dated

29-11-2006

Dated

15-12-2008

Dated

25-12-2008

16-01-2003

Dated

15-12-2008

Dated 5935 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

25-06-2002

25-12-2008

2125

Dated

5 Lakadáram

15-12-2008

Dated

2905(Ε)

05-09-2009 6

2125

Dated 25-06-2002

Rudravaram

218

Dated 16-01-2003

Dated 15-12-2008

2905 ( Ε)

28-08-2009

Dated

2212(E)

District : Medak

State : Andhra Pradesh Mandal : Sangareddy

05-09-2009 1

2125

25-06-2002

Dated

Cheriyal

218

Dated 16-01-2003

Dated 15-12-2008

2905 ( Ε)

Dated 28-08-2009

2212(E)

2 Kandi

Dated 25-06-2002

10-07-2008

2125

05-09-2009

2125

Dated 25-06-2002

3 Kothlapur

Dated 16-01-2003

218

02-02-2007

Dated

288

15-12-2008

Dated

2905 (Ε)

28-08-2009

Dated

2212(E)

25-12-2008 4

2125

Dated 25-06-2002

Pothireddypalli

15-12-2008

Dated

2905(Ε)

State : Andhra Pradesh

District : Medak

Mandal : Kondapur

25-12-2008

Dated 25-06-2002

2125

1 Malkapur

16-01-2003

Dated

218

Dated 02-02-2007

288

Dated 15-12-2008

2905 ( Ε)

25-12-2008

2125

Dated 25-06-2002

2 Thogarpalli

16-01-2003

218

Dated

29-11-2006

Dated

4581

Dated 15-12-2008

2905 (Ε)

25-12-2008

Dated 25-06-2002

2125

3 Girmapur

Dated 15-12-2008

2905 (Ε)

05-09-2009

25-06-2002

Dated

2125

4 Garakurthi

15-12-2008

Dated

2905 ( Ε)

29-11-2006

Dated

4581

28-08-2009

Dated

2212(E) 5936

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 /ASHVINA 11 , 1931

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii ) ] 1

District : Medak

State : Andhra Pradesh Mandal : Sadashivpet

2126

20-04-2009

Dated 25-06-2002

Peddapur

15-12-2008

Dated

2905 ( Ε)

Dated 08-04-2009

949(Ε)

2 Nandikandi

2126

Dated 25-06-2002

10-07-2008 3

2126

Dated 25-06-2002

25-12-2008 Siddapur

4339

10-11-2006

Dated

Dated 15-12-2008

2905 (Ε)

2126

25-06-2002

25-12-2008 4

Dated

Sadashivpet

15-12-2008

Dated

2905(Ε)

25-06-2002

2126

Dated

20-04-2009 5 Maddikunta

15-12-2008

Dated

2905 ( Ε)

08-04-2009

Dated

949 (Ε)

25-06-2002

20-04-2009

2126

Dated

6 Tangedpalli

15-12-2008

Dated

2905 ( Ε)

08-04-2009

Dated

949( Ε)

20-04-2009

2126

Dated 25-06-2002

Milgiripet

10-11-2006

4339

Dated

08-04-2009

Dated

949(Ε)

District: Medak

State : Andhra Pradesh Mandal : Munipalll

2126

20-04-2009

Dated 25-06-2002

1 Ibrahimpur

4339

10-11-2006

Dated

15-12-2008

Dated

2905 ( Ε)

08-04-2009

Dated

949 (Ε)

10-07-2008 Kamkol

2126

Dated 25-06-2002

4339

10-11-2006

Dated

District: Medak

State : Andhra Pradesh Mandal : Koheer

2126

25-06-2002

Dated

20-12-2008 1 Venkatapur

Dated 15-12-2008

2905 (Ε)

25-06-2002

2 Kaveli

2126

Dated

05-09-2009

15-12-2008

Dated

2905 (Ε)

08-04-2009

Dated

949(Ε)

28-08-2009

Dated

2212(Ε) [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

2126 Gurujwada

4339

2905 ( Ε) 4 Madri

2126

2905 (Ε)

949(Ε)

2212( Ε)

5937

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

25-12-2006 Dated 25-06-2002

10-11-2006

Dated

Dated 15-12-2008

Dated 25-06-2002

05-09-2009 15-12-2008

Dated

Dated 08-04-2009

28-08-2009

Dated

District: Medak

Mandal : Zaheerabad.

2126 1 Huggeli

4339

State: Andhra Pradesh 25-06-2002

25-12-2008 Dated

Dated 10-11-2006

15-12-2008

2905(E) Dated

2126 2 Ranjol

2905(Ε)

949(Ε)

934 3 Hothi(Khurd)

2126

4339

949(Ε) 4

934 Hothi(Bujrug)

2126

1341

2905 (Ε)

2212(Ε)

934 5 Khasimpur

2905(Ε)

2212(Ε)

934 6 Satwar

2905 (Ε)

934 7 Chiragpalli

3439G1/09-12

20-04-2009 Dated 25-06-2002

15-12-2008

Dated

08-04-2009

Dated

20-04-2009 07-03-2005

Dated

25-06-2002

Dated

Dated 10-11-2006

08-04-2009

Dated

07-03-2005

05-09-2009 Dated

Dated 25-06-2002

Dated 30-04-2003

15-12-2008

Dated

Dated 28-08-2009

05-09-2009 Dated 07-03-2005

15-12-2008

Dated

Dated 28-08-2009

20-12-2008 07-03-2005

Dated

Dated 15-12-2008

07-03-2005

Dated

20-12-2008 To be published under Rule 4 of the P&MP (ARUL) Rules,1983, framed under Section 17 ofP &MP (ARUL) Act 1982 in official Gazette of India.

[F. No. L- 14014/40/2009-G.P .

K.K.SHARMA , Under Secy.

5938

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 / ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii)]

Dated , the 18th August, 2009 .

AWARD

श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 31 अगस्त, 2009

By order No. L-20012/ 317 /2000-( C- I )dated 22-11-2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

का.आ. 2716.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बी. सी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय संख्या 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 333/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/317/2000-आई. आर. ( सी-1 ) ]

"Whether the action of the management of M/ s . B.C.C. Ltd. of Western Jharia Area in dismissing Sri S. P. Chatterjee , Cap Lamp Incharge w.e.f. 29-6-2000 is proper , legal and justified ? If not to what relief is the concerned workman entitled ?"

स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi , the 31st August , 2009

S.O. 2716.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 33/2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. I , Dhanbad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . BCCL and their workman , which wasreceived by the Central Government on 31-8-2009 .

[No. L-20012/317/2000- IR(C- I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. I , DHANBAD .

In the matter of a reference U/ s . 10( 1 ) (d) ( 2A) of 1. D. Act .

Reference No. 333 of 2000 .

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Western Jharia Area of M/ s . B.C.C. Ltd.

AND

Their Workmen .

Present : Shri H. M. Singh , Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES

Sh.H. Nath ,

Forthe Employers

Advocate

For the Workman

Sh . D. Mukherjee ,

Advocate and

Secretary , B. C. K.

2. Written statement has been filed on behalf of the concerned workman stating that S.P. Chatterjee had been working as permanent Cap Lamp incharge since long with unblemished record of service. The management issued him a false and frivolous chargesheet dated 29-4-2000 which he came to know only on 17-5-2000 when he reported for his duty. The chargesheet was issued to the concerned workman for serving an Advocate Notice to the DGMS regarding Plot No. mentioned in the chargesheet . For the aforesaid reason and allegation chargesheet- cum- suspension order was issued to the concerned workman by invoking clause 26-1-11 , 26-1-12 and 26-1-15 . The concerned workman replied to the chargesheet denying the charges emphatically and in the same time submitted that the allegation as levelled in the chargesheet does not constitute any misconduct as per provision of the standing order and hence the chargesheet is illegal and void abinitio . Seeing the adamant attitude of the management the union onbehalf of the concerned workman raised an industrial dispute before the A.L.C. (C) , Dhanbad challenging the illegal and arbitrary chargesheet and suspension order . During the pendency of the aforesaid dispute before the conciliation officer the biased and prejudiced Enquiry Officer issued a notice dated 26-5-2000 wherein asking him to appear before him on 6-6-2000 . The concerned workman submitted his reply dated 6-6-2000 to the aforesaid notice wherein he stated that the notice was recieved by him on 5-6-2000 , so it is not possible to get himselfprepared for the enquiry . He further submitted that the industrial dispute is pending wherein he challenged the charge - sheet itself. As the chargesheet was issued with anulterior motive to victimise the concerned workman so the management was in hot haste to complete the formalities andto dismiss him and accordingly an illegal and arbitrary dismissal order dated 29-6-2000 was issued to him by an unauthorised person just few days of his superannuation . The concerned workman represented before the management against the illegal and arbitrary dismissal order but to no effect . Thereafter the dismissal order was challenged and the matter has been referred to this Hon'ble Tribunal for adjudication.

Union .

State : Jharkhand .

Industry : Coal .

It has been prayed before this Hon'ble Tribunal to answer the reference in favour of the workman by directing 5939 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

the management to reinstate the concerned workman with full back wages .

to DGMS regarding plot number mentioned in the charge- sheet does not in any way violated Standing Order of the company on which basis charge - sheet was issued and the enquirywas held ex - parte and dismissal Order was issued just few days before his superannuation. He has argued that no notice was published for holding ex- parte enquiry inthe News Paper .

7. In this respect it has been argued on behalf of the management that the concerned workman was given notice . He violated the company's standing orders 26-1-11 , 26-1-12 and 26-1-15 , so he has beendismissed from service after fair and proper enquiry .

8. The management's witness , MW - 1 , who has conducted the enquiry, has stated in his cross - examination " It is true that during enquiry the managementnagement did not file orproduce any Advocate's notice issued to the DGMS on behalf of the concerned workman . " At page 2 he has also stated . " It is true that during enquiry proceeding no any document was filed on behalf of the management to show that the management was the owner of those lands, the description of which was given in the chargesheet . " He has also stated before fixing the enquiry ex- parte the enquiry notice was not published in any News Paper . It is also ture that during enquiry the concerned workman had submitted a representation requesting for staying the enquiry proceeding so long the conciliation proceeding is not concluded . He has admitted that he did not grant any adjournment and proceeded in the matter and then submitted his enquiry report after concluding the enquiry proceeding .

3. The written statement has been filed by the management stating therein that the concerned workman was working as a Cap Lamp Incharge of Murlidih 20/21 pitscolliery. The concerned workman was issued a charge- sheetvide letter dated 29-4-2000 for violating the provisions of the Certified Standing Orders of the Company under Clauses 26-1-11 , 26-1-12 and 26-1-15 i.e. dishonesty in connection with company's business , giving false information and causing wilful damage to work in progress of the company. The chargesheet was sent to the concerned workman by his native village address . The Enquiry Officer issued enquiry notice to the concerned workman through office peon , where he was not found. Again the copy of the said chargesheet was sent by registered post, which was returned undelivered . The charge- sheet was also displayed on the Notice Board . Sri B. K. Singh , the Dy. Personnal Manager, Murlidih was appointed tohold enquiry and he sent a notice of enquiry to the concerned workman vide letter dated 25-5-2000 and again by letter dated 8-6-2000 . As the concerned workınan did not attend the enquiry in spite of repeated notices, the enquiry was held ex- parte and the Enquiry Officer found the charges against him proved beyond shadow ofdoubt. The concerned workman was given again the opportunity to defend himself vide letter dated 26-6-2000 but the concerned workman refused to accept the letter. Accordingly, he was dismissed from his service of the company vide letter dated 29-6-2000 . The enquiry was conducted according to the rules of natural justice and the concerned workman intentionally did not participate in the enquiry proceedings . The dismissal of the concerned workman on the grave charges indicated in the charge - sheet is perfectly legal and justified and the punishment short of dismissal would have encouraged the other employees of the company to indulge in such mal-practices .

It has been prayed that the Hon'ble Tribunal maybe pleased to hold that the dismissal of S. P. Chatterjee , the Cap Lamp Incharge from 29-6-2000 is legal and fullyjustified and the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief.

4. Both the parties have filed their respective rejoinders admitting and denying the contents of some of the paragraphs of each others written statement.

5. The management has produced Sri Bipin Kumar Singh as MW - 1 , who has proved documents as Exts . M - 1 to M-7.

The concerned workman has examined himself a WW - 1 in support of his case .

It shows that on which chargesheet was issued that has not been produced and no witness has been produced by the Enquiry Officer . During enquiry proceeding , which violated the principle of natural justice, no notice was served upon him , as per statement of the workman , by the management . Moreover, the management has not given any notice of enquiry report of second enquiry , as such , which is also violation ofjudgement of Hon'ble Supreme Courtreported in ( 1991 ) | SCC 588. The learned Advocate oftheworkman referred 2008 (2 ) JLJR 513 on which Hon'ble High Court laid down - Departmental proceeding- punishment of reduction of salary - before imposing punishment , no second show cause notice served nor copy of enquiry report given by disciplinary authority- petitioner admittedly given no opportunity to defend himself nor informed on the basis of which impugned punishment awarded to him- clear case of prejudice and violation of principle of natural justice - appellate authority while dismissing petitioner's appeal , also not made any discussion on several grounds advanced by petitioner- impugned orders quashed -directed to pay amount of deducted wages for suspension period.

6. The main argument advanced on behalf of the concerned workman that the concerned workman has been charge- sheeted for violating the provisions of clauses 26-1-11,26-1-12 and 26-1-15 of the Standing Orders . He argued that the matter which is not related to the working ofconcerned workman and giving notice to the Advocate

9. The workman also referred 1983 Lab . I. C. 1909 (SC) in which it has been laid down that Industrial Employment ( standing orders ) Act , 1946 condition of service and power to prescribe is not unilateral . It has also been held that under sec . 13 -A of Industrial Employment 5940

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 / ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] (standing orders ) Act - misconduct neither defined nor. enumerated in standing order - not punishable merely because employer believes it to be misconduct ex -post facto.

Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947) , between theManagement of Indian Airlines Ltd. and their workmen.) BETWEEN

Union 1st party/ 1st Petitioner

1. The General Secretary : AirportEmployees Federation of India Channai .

1stparty/2nd Petitioner Union

The management has not filed any paper showing misconduct in this standing order of the company under clause 26-1-11,26-1-12 and 26-1-15 on which basis charge- sheet has been issued to the concerned workman . Moreover, as per management's witness no paper has beenfiled regarding ownership of the management on which basis the chargesheet has been issued to the concerned workman because of his notice to the DGMS .

2. The General Secretary : Chennai Airport Contract Workers Union Chennai

Vs.

: Respondent/ 11 Party 10. In view of the discussions made above , I come to the conclusion that the action of the management of M/ s. BCCL of Western Jharia Area in dismissing Sri . S. P. Chatterjee , Cap Lamp Incharge , w.e.f. 29-6-2000 is not proper, legal and justified . So , he is entitled for reinstatement till his superannuation with full back wages . Themanagement is directed to implement the award within 30 days from the date of publication of the award.

The Management National Aviation Company of India Ltd. Airlines House Meenambakkam Chennai -27 .

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES

नई दिल्ली , 31 अगस्त, 2009

: M/s . Balan Haridas

Forthe Ist Petitioner Union

For the 2nd Petitioner Union : M/ sK. M. Ramesh

: M/s . N. G. R. Prasad

For the Management

AWARD

का.आ. 2717.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार नेशनल एविएशन कम्पनी ऑफ इंडिया लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 69/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide its order No. L- 11012/57/ 2002 IR- ( C- I ) dated 10-04-2003 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication .

[सं. एल-11012/57/2002- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ]

The schdule mentioned in that order is:

स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 31st August , 2009

"Whether the demand of Airports Employees Federation of India from the management of Indian Airlines Ltd. For absorption of 99 contract workmen (asper list ) by the principal employer (M/ s . Indian AirlinesLtd. ) in their respective cadres/trades isjust, fairand legal ? If so , to what relief are the workman entitled andfrom what date ?"

S.O. 2717. In pursuance of Section 17. of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 69/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court Chennai now-as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of National Aviation Company of India Ltd. and their workmen , which received by the Central Government on 31-8-2009 .

[No. 1. - 11012/57/2002 -JR(C+ I) ]

2. After the receipt of the Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it is ID 69/2003 . Pursuant to notice both the parties entered appearance through their respective counsel and filed their respective pleadings viz . Claim Statement and Counter Statement as the case maybe.

SNETE LADA JAWAS, Desk Officer

3 ..While so as per order dated 3-2-2004 on IA 32/2003 , Ist Party/ 2nd petitioner was impleaded .

BEFORE HUECINHOBAOVERNMENT INDUSTRMINIBUNMECUMULABOUMCOUNT CHENNAI

Thusday , the 27th Augest, 2009

Present : A. N. Janardanan , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 69/2003

(Inthe matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A ) of

The Ist Party/ Ist petitioner filed pursuant to impleament of 2nd petitioner amended statement of claim and the Ist Party/2nd petitioner filed a separate claim statement . A commen counter statement was filed on behalf of the Respondent . Rejoinder statement was filed by Ist Petitioner Union and Reply filed by 2nd Petitioner Union . Second Petitioner Union filed additional Claim Statement to which Respondent filed Additional Counter Statement again to which 2nd Petitioner Union filed reply.

5941 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

4. The averments in the amended Claim Statement of 1st Party/First petitioner union read briefly as follows :

numberingto 19. For plumbing the so called Contractor is Ranga Electricals and for Carpentry work, the Contractor is P. Krishnan, both of whom are only name lenders. The subject workmen are directly under the control and supervision of the Respondent whose work is of perennial nature . They have been working for a period ranging from 5 to 20 years . the son of Contractor Rangan is working as Supervisor with the subject workmen . The contract or is nowwhere in the workspot. Rangan is paid wages at Rs . 2,600 per mensem showing the contract to be false. The subject workmen are working in the Service Complex and NNTC , Airline House , Booking Office and Airlines Staff Colony . One set of Plumber to whom are assigned the plumbing work in the Service Complex and NNTC also take care of the overhead tank ( 1,35,000 litres) supplying water to the above area. They also take care of 6 borewells , pump houses , under ground sumps , supply of water to all ofwhich is essential. One Plumber and One Helper are posted at Airline House where plumbing work requires constant maintenance and plumbing in a very huge built-up area . The maintenance of open well water supply and two pump houses is also attended to by them . Water supply to the booking office apartment located at huge premises is maintained by the Plumber and Helper . In the staffofcolony of Indian Airlines , 4 Plumbers and 4 Helpers are working. They also maintain the attached sport stadium and the holdings there within , community centre , kindergarten school , pump houses, 3 bore wells , 3 open wells , sewerage treatment plants, main overhead tank, individual over headtanks , maintenance office , garden pipelines etc. The plumbers work in 3 shifts as well as in the night during summer season . The present strength of the subject workmen is insufficient . The entire carpentry maintenance work in the above areas is done through 3 Carpenters and 2 Carpenter helpers whose work is continuous. Plumbers are paid Rs . 2,560 Plumbing helpers Rs . 2,350 , Carpenters are paid Rs . 2700 and Carpenter helpers Rs . 2,500 as wages per mensem . Carpenters work under the direct control of Civil Engineering Department oftheManagement . The work of Plumbing and Carpentry isdirectly entrusted to the concerned worker by the Dy. Manager of the Respondent , Junior Engineer under Respondent gives instructions . The complaints are received and registered by the Engincering Department and work is accordingly entrusted to the concerned worker. The Contractor is nowhere there . The Contractor's son disburses monthly paymentto the Plumbers . The Carpentry Contractor also simply disburses the wages .

6. In the common Counter Statement, the Respondent raised the contentions which read briefly as follows:

The members of the First Petitioner Union were employed as Sweepers , Scavengers , Electricians , Assistant Electricians, Plumbers, Carpenters and Air- condition Plant Operators under the Respondent through Contractors and have put in not less than 2 years but extending to 10 years service and continuing in service even with the change of Contractors . The work of the petitioners is perennial in nature . The contract between the management and the Contractors is mere paper arrangement . The work is controlled and supervised by the officials of the Respondent. The Contractors are merely name lenders . Payments are directly made by the Management . Respondent official extract the work. The contract is sham and nominal to evade compliance of beneficial legislations. the contract is devised to deny subject workmen status and benefits of regular workmen . The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act , 1970 is to abolish contract labour in perennial nature work which is exploited by the Respondent. As per the decision of the Apex Court in STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. AND OTHERS AND NATIONAL UNION WATERFED WORKERS AND OTHERS (2001-4- LLN- 135 ) , it has been held that " Ifthe alleged contract between the Principal Employer and Contractor is sham and nominal , the workmen have the right for absorption " . Regarding Sweepers and Scavengers , the Contractor is one Mrs. Girija with the Management . In regard to electical maintenance work, the contract is with Kamatchi Amman Electricals for whom no license is obtained under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act , 1970. For plumbing and carpentry work, the contract is with Rangan Electricals. Regarding sewage and water treatment plant, the contract is with EnracEngineering . M/s . Blue Star International has taken contract for Air- conditioning Maintenance Plant. The work is of perennial nature . It is just for the management to employ workmen directly since the work is perennial in nature . Since the efforts with the Management for regularization of the subject workmen were not fruitful, ID was raised, conciliation was held but which having failed culminating in the failure report, the present reference is occasioned at the instance of the Ministry of Labour and Employment . The contention of the Management that the Management has registered under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 as Principal Employer at the conciliation proceedings and can therefore keep contract workers is without any substance . That is not a ground for bar from making a claim for absorption on the ground that the contract is sham and nominal . It is the management that employs , supervises and controls the workmen . The claim of the management is with a view to exploit cheap labour in victimization and unfair labour practice. The First Petitioner Union confines the Industrial Dispute with respect to Electricians , Asstt . Electricians and Electrical Supervisor , altogether 28 in nubmer .

The 1st Party/First Petitioner Union having confined their relief In respect of 28 workmen in the Electrical Maintenance Work and 1 st Party/Second Petitioner Union confining to 19 workmen under Plumbing and Carpentry totaling to 47 workmen whose cases are espoused by the respective unions , the Counter Statement is also limited 5. The Second Petitioner Union espoused the same or similar cause in respect of workmen employed as Plumber, Plumbers and Carpenter and Carpenter helpers 5942

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 / ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] to such workmen . The nature of electrical work let out, on the vicinity is enough . The carpentry work was also contracted on the above lines and T. Girija was issued the contract who deposited Rs . 4,000 as EMD later adjusted as Security Deposit . The contract was issued for one year for a consideration of Rs . 10,300 per mensem. Thereafter renewed . Thereafter following the same process another Contractor P. Krishnan was appointed which was extended from time to time . While another Contractor was about to be appointed, the Second Petitioner Union obtained status quo order and therefore that Contract with P. Krishnan is ongoing . The work relates to replacement of damaged parts and repairs when required as well as maintenance by deploying sufficient workmen. The work is also not perennial as could be seen from the nature of the work. The said Contractor remits the EPF and ESI contributions . It is not necessary for him to obtain license since he is engagtng less than 20 employees . The contract is not sham and nominal .

7. In the Rejoinder Statement , the further contention raised by the First Petitioner Union briefly reads as follows:

Prior to 1991 , the subject workmen were under a Contractor by name Doss . It was thereafter that they came under M/ s . Kamatchi Amman Electricals . Initially and lately except after 1995 for a while Kamatchi Amman Electricals has had no license . ESI contribution was paid under the code number of the Respondent . There is no electrician employed by the Respondent for all kinds of electrical works . It is difficult to believe that there is no electrical work to be done in an establishment of this magnitude . In the place of CP 68/96 " Withdrawn Dismissed " CCP 6/2002 has been filed and pending before Central Government Labour Court , Chennai .

8. In the Reply Statement , the contentions raised by the Second Petitioner Union briefly read as follows :

Plumber workers started working since 1980 and not 1996. M/s . Ranga Electricals came in 29 years before. That his contract was extended from 30-05-1997 is not true . When there arose Glamour for regularization after long years of service while Respondent invited tender , Union approached the High Court in Writ . Attendance Registers and Complaint Registers are maintained by the Respondent in respect of them signed by Airlines officials . The officials depute the workmen to attend the work . They would also issue completion certificate. Same is the case withthe Complaint Registers in the Staff Quarters . Thus the workers are supervised and are under the control of the Respondent . Wages were distributed and Wage Register authenticated by the officials , Carpenters are working since 1991 and not from 1995 .

9. In the additional Claim Statement , the Second Petitioner Union placed contentions which briefly read as follows:

contract relates to replacement of fluorescent tubes , chokes , repairs and rewiring oflight fittings , starters , repairs of fans , motors etc. at the various places at Chennai Airport . There was advertisement in Newspapers dated 17-07-1994, out of 42 applicants . 8 were shortlisted . Of them , M/s . Kamatchi Amman Electricals was given contract on 10-01-1995 for 2 years . There was deposit of EMD of Rs . 24,800 which was adjusted against a Security Deposit of Rs . 25,920. The contract amount was Rs . 72,000 per mensem. The Contractor had to engage one Electrical Supervisor and 14 sets of workers , each set consisting one Electrician and one Helper . The Respondent is a registered employer under Contract Labour ( Regulation and Abolition) , Act , 1970. M/ s . Kamatchi Amman Electricals has obtained Contractors License who has separate EPF and ESI Code . The workers were supplied by the Contractor who also paid wages to them collecting the same through their representative at the time of wages disbursement as authorized under Section -21 of the Act . Thework was got done and supervised by the Contractor . The contract stood extended from time to time . In 2002 , there was contract locationwise (5 locations) four locations with the same Contractor and the IAL Housing Colony with Ranga Electricals who is also a license holder and with separate EPF and ESI Code . Fault of work is only informed to Contractor Supervisor . The Management representative only ensures correct payment of wages by the Contractors . Rs . 45,000 per mensem is paid to Ranga Electricals . The contract is genuine and not sham and nominal . The workers were not appointed by the Management . It is denied that the contract system is adopted to deprive workmen their legitimate claims . The electrical work is not perennial . Only when there is fault , the workers are needed . Such questions arise for consideration only when appropriate Government is moved by the workmen under Section - 10 of the Contract LabourAct for abolition of the system . The workmen under Kamatchi Amman Electricals in their Claim Statement under Section - 33 ( C )( 2) in CP No. 68/96 stated that they are workers under the Contractors as opposed to their present stand . For plumbing work pursuant to advertisement as above Ranga Electricals was selected as the Contractor for 1 year w.e.f. 01-04-1996 for contract amount of Rs . 38,560 per mensem . They have a license . There should be one Supervisor and 7 sets of workers , Engineer In - charge would appraise the Supervisor of the Contractor who attends to it . The Contractor has to be present as and when required. The contract was extended for 2 years from 01-04-1997 and again renewed for another year and extended till 31-07-2003 . While so , when fresh tenders were called since status quo order was obtained by Second Petitioner Union, the said contract is ongoing. It is denied that the workers are directly under the Respondent or that work is perennial in nature . The Contractor's son is supervising the work as Supervisor whose presence in

33 Sweepers and Cleaners have become members of theSecond Petitioner Union after resigning from the First 5943 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

Respondent disbureses wages . They are entitled to be regularized.

12. Points for consideration are :-

(i) Whether the demand for absorption of the petitioners by the Respondent /Management in their respective cadres /trades is just, fair and legal ?

(ii) To what relief they are entitled to ?

13. Evidence in this ID consists of the oral evidence of WWI to WW5 and Ex . WI to Ex . W112 on the petitioner's side and testimony of MWI to MW3 and Ex. MI to Ex. M215 on the side of the Respondent .

Point No. 1

Petitioner Union . They are working in the premises ofthe Respondent in various departments since long years in a continuous and perennial manner under direct control of the Respondent . Even with change of several Contractors they remain continuously engaged in sweeping and cleaning activities . They work in the Personnel Department , Accounts Department, Civil Engineering, Vigilance , Stores and Medical Departments , Car Parking, Sports club and Stationery Stores , Toilets , Service Complex , Transport.and Security Departments , New Hangar Department, Canteen , Catering, Cargo, Ground Support , Import Cargo , Operation Departments mopping in personnel and accounts department, with a so - called supervisor who also actually works . The Personnel Department controls them . Materials are provided by the Respondent. The Respondent engages permanent workers under the category who are doing the same work and are with all benefits . To deny benefits , the workers are termed as Contract Employees which is not trueandthe contract is sham and nominal . They are entitled to regularization .

10. In the additional Counter Statement , the Respondent avers as follows:

14. Under the reference the number of workmen referred as per enclosed list is 99. But by the respective First and Second Petitioner Union together the cases of only a total of 80 workmen under the various categories viz . Electrician , Asstt . Electricians , Plumbers , Plumber helpers , Carpenters , Carpenter helpers , Air condition Plant Operators , Sweepers and Cleaners are espoused by setting up relevant pleadings , as against 99 workmen under the reference as per list.

TheRespondent engages 45 Sweepers and Cleaners whereas only cases of 33 such members have been espoused by the Union. It is as per paper advertisement and after obtaining tender forms from competitive tenders that T. Girija, lowest quoted tenderer was appointed as Contractor which was extended for another year . In 1993 , new tender was invited and one Sudarshan was appointed for one year whichwas extended for another year. While so , when fresh. notification was issued, the same Sudarshan won the contract on 16-5-1995 who was appointed for 3 years and who also got a license . He also executed Bank Guarantee towards Security Deposit and got alloted PF Code Number. In 2000 he having found to be defaulter in the remittance of worker'scontribution , his contract was terminated and the previous Contractor Girija was assigned the contract work . Then the Petitioner Union obtained status quo order . The work was executed by the Contractor . The fact that with change of Contractor but not with change of employees what it means is that they are workers under the Respondent . The Contractor alone pays salary to the workmen . The contract is genuine. Power ofprohibition of Contract Labour under Section - 10 ( 1 ) of the Contract Labour ( Regulation andAbolition ) Act, 1970 vests with the Central Government vide judgement of the Supreme Court in Steel Authority's case(2001-7 - SCC 1 ) . They are not entitled to the relief.

11. In the reply to the Additional Counter Statement of the Respondent, the Second Petitioner Union raised contentions which briefly read as follows :

15.The learned counsel for the First Petitioner Union and Second Petitioner Union of whom the case of electricians . Asstt . electricians and Electrical Supervisor numbering to 28 is espoused by the First Party/ lst petitioner union . The workers under the other categories having resigned from the Union and joined the Ist party/ 2nd petitioner union the common contentions on behalf of the workmen under both the Unions advanced by the respective counsel are that though they are styled as contract workmen , they are actually workmen directly under the Respondent/Management and the contract is a mere paper arrangement between the two contracting parties viz . the concerned contractors of the various items of work on the one hand and the Management on the other . The work turned out by the workmen is also sought to be characterized as of perennial in nature with control and supervision over them by the Respondent/ Management through its officials . The Contractors are attributed of being merely name lenders . Another contention is that payments due to the workmen concerned are made by the Management and that actually the Respondent officials are extracting the work from the workmen. The contract is also assailed as sham and nominal with a view to evade compliance of the requirement of beneficial legislations such as status as well as monetary and other benefits that would accrue to the regular workmen. It is further pointed out if the contract is one found to be sham and nominal the workmen have the right to absorption vide the judgment of the Apex Court is Steel Authority of India and Others and National Union Waterfed Workers and Others (2001-4 - LLN - 135 ).

During June 2000 to July 2001 , Sweepersbecame direct employees in the absence of so - called Contractor . Without notice under Section - 9A the change is void abinitio . The contract is sham and nominal . The 5944

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

worker under the category of Sweepers that the temporary workmen under the same are termed as contract workers .

According to the learned counsel it is just for the Management to employ workmen directly since the work is perennial in nature. They would further contend that it is theManagement that employs and supervise the workmen. TheManagement is exploiting cheap labour in victimizing and adopting unfair labour practice upon the workmen .

16. The Second Petitioner Union who espousesthe cause of Plumbers , Carpenters and Helpers , Sweepers and Cleaners numbering 33 also canvassed the same or similar contentions . According to him the Contractor is nowhere in the workspot .

17. The contra contentions on behalf of the Respondent are that a flat denial of the claims of the petitioners .According to them , the nature of work let out on contract was after inviting tenders in the wake of notification and following the due selection process and demanding the sucessful bidder to deposit Security Deposit , thereafter fixing contract amount payable per mensem and such other formalities . They further contend that the Respondent is a registered employer under the Contract Labour ( R & A ) Act , 1970 and they are authorized to keep contract workmen . According to them the Contractors appointed have had license with EPF and ESI Codes . The Contractors got the work done and supervised and the various contracts stood extended from time to time. The payment of wages is not made be the Management . Only Management representative ensures correct payment ofwages by the Contractors as authorized under Section - 21 of Contract Labour Act , 1970. The contract is not sham and nominal. The contract system is nota ruse in victimization or adopting unfair labour practice on the workmen . The electrical work is not perennial . In the Claim Statement of CP 68/96 under Section - 33 ( C ) (2 ) of IDAct , the petitioners have admitted to be workers under the Contractors which is a stand opposed to in this ID. The presence of Contractor is necessary as and when needed. Supervisors are there to control the work . Carpentry item of work relates to replacement of damaged parts effecting repairs and maintenance which is not perennial from their very nature. The Carpentry Contractor engages only less than 20 employees and therefore no license is needed for him under Contract Labour Act .

18. The learned counsel for the petitioner union further contended that as regards Sweepers an emphatic argument is that during June 2000 to July 2001 there was no Contractor and that they became direct employees . The change so occasioned is without a notice as required under Section- 9A of the ID Act and is therefore void . It is further contended that the Sweepers have been working since long years in - a continuous and perennial manner under the direct control of the Respondent and even with change of Contractors now and then they were engaged continuously to carry on the sweeping and clearing activities . Is is to deny benefits extended to permanent

19.A perusal of the evidence documentary and oral and other relevant records only leads me to the concluslion that the case of the petitioners under all the categories are bound to fail . None of the documents relied on and exhibited on behalf of the petitioner is capable of showing atleast a tendency of the claim of the petitioners being true regarding the nature of their appointments , the wages payable and the mode thereof. There is nothing to show that any items of work carried out by the various categories ofworkmen are of a perennial nature and that they have been engaged in doing them for a very long time in a perennial manner . Having special reference to various items ofwork it could be seen that each such item of work is not ofa perennial nature . Electrical maintenance work could be found from the very nature to be attended to not prennially or in a continuous manner . Once the electrical installation is already there and if satified to be intact, thereafter what is required to be done is when any fault occurs in relation to the said installation or the system in piecemeal or in the whole that it has to be attended to by way of repair or of providing some additional facility or. the rectification of defect as each situation specifically warrants . It could hardly be a perennial nature of work to be attended to by providing a network of workmen or a single workman always on guard or alert to do it continuously froin round the clock . The same is the case with the items of work such as Plumbing and Carpentry as well . Regarding the work of Sweepers and Cleaners evidently there is a set of regular employees under the Management who attend to the said item of work in a routine manner in the sphere of their allotted activity. Contract labour are engaged in various other premises of the establishment under the Respondent which require sweeping or cleaning premises but not as incidental to the main activity of the establishment . The fact that a regular set of employees is maintained for attending to that item of work itself connotes the idea that the Sweepers and Cleaners engaged as contract labour are meant for premises with only a mediocre importance and not for so essential areas or premises incidental to the main activity ofthe establishment . However , it does not mean that they are not a category of workmen for doing the same work which would totally be avoided or evaded from the very establishment to keep the premises and precincts of the establishment quite clean and hygienic . The fact that even with a change ofa Contractor another Contractor is sought to be inducted for getting done such item of work itself shows that a set of such category of workers is also needed todo sweeping and cleaning work . The same is not to be of such a perennial and regular work of sweeping and cleaning as attended to by the workmen borne in the cadre ofthe regular establishment under the Management. The petitioners have no case that they are appointed by 5945 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

means of orders of appointment issued to them or that they wereselected under a due process of recruitment undergone inaccordance with established rules or regulations .

contract inter se the Management and the concerned Contractors . On all these considerations it is only to be held that the claim of the petitioners that the contract is sham and nominal and that they are direct workers under theManagement and are entitled to regularization is only to be dismissed . It is ordered so .

Point No. 2 :

To what relief the concerned workmen are entitled to ?

21. In the light of above finding , none of the Petitioner Unions is entitled to the claim for regularization under the Respondent/Management and they are not entitledto any relief.

22. The learned counsel for the petitioners vehemently advanced before me another contention that since the petitioners under the various categories having beenworking quite for a long time numbering to several years in the event of an order being rendered against them as being not entitled to be regularized under the services of the Respondent/ Management , this Tribunal in the equitable exercise of discretion may be pleased to extend to them a concession of prolongation of their service period until a time regular employees take charge in thetr places owing to their having to be discharged from their respective avocations . I am rightly reminded of the power of this Tribunal to mould reliefs as an Industrial Adjudicator in appropriate cases . Having regard to the earnest submissions made on behalf of the workmen , I am of the view that they may not be made to vacate their present avocations instantaneously with or immediately after the passing of this award . It is only just and proper that they are allowed to continue in their present avocations until they are to be replaced by similar workmen ifatall a new Contractor/ Contractors securing entry into the scene must replace them who have been in the field with rich experience of long years of service and whose services could be used by the same Contractors if continued to employ with much efficacy, until any other workmen newly appointed in their places : actually takes charge. So ordered.

23. The reference is answered as above as far as the same relates to the 80 workmen who appeared and contested filing statements of claim out of the 99 workmen under reference.

24 The reference is answered accordingly .

(Dictated to the P. A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 27th August , 2009)

A. N. JANARDANAN , Presiding Officer

Witness Examined

WWI Sri Anand Kumar

For the 1st Party/

WW2 Sri E. Venkatraman

Petitioner

WW3 Sri N. K. Murugesan

WW4 Sri A. Nagarjan

WW5 Sri A. Tajuddin 20. Here the predominant contention of the pettioners inter- alia is that though they came in as contract labour, they came to be workers directly under the Respondent/Management at least from a certain point of the time if not from the very inception . That is to say the contract through which they came is mere sham and nominal or rather a camouflage in later times . The Contractors are only name lenders and this devise is adopted by the Management so as to deprive them the benefits extended to regular employees and to reap cheap labour in their victimization and unfair labour practice. This aspect has to be met with a more critical mind as to how far they could be true . The very fact that these workmen are doing works of such a nature as are not perennial or continuous with regard to the time for its performance makes it a reality that no Management could afford to maintain such a set of workmen with the obligation to pay them all the benefits that accrue to a regular employee . For the fact that the work of the petitioners cannot be found to be totally perennial in nature , they cannot be equated with the status of regular employees and in terms of monetary considerations as well . Some other instances canvassed on behalf of the petitioners that they are paid wages directly by the Management , that their work is controlled and supervised by the officials of the Management , that their Attendance Registers etc. are maintained by the Respondent/ Management are not facts proved to be actually so . The presence of the Contractor at the workspot even according to the Respondent/ Management is only needed as and when called for . Supervisors under the Contractors are admittedly present at the workspot, who according to the petitioners themselves do the work alonwith them. That cannot be taken as a circumstance to hold that such Supervisors are also workers like them . It is pertinent to notethat the contract labour working continously for years and acquire much experience in their work they are doing and therefore gradually the necessity of the presence of a Supervisor to give any instructions to them at the workspot invariable pales into insignificance . Discernibly there is no worthwhile evidence to show that the petitioners are direct workers under the Management and that the contract isonly sham and nominal . There is also no evidence to show that the work is of a perennial nature though the contract document is not produced before the tribunal everybody admits the fact that there is a contract which the petitioners describe as only a paper arrangement and isnot one intended to work out . Speaking circumstances as to existence of a contract dispenses with the necessity of producing it . Therefore the non - production of the contract document is also of no significance to disprove the case of the Respondent as to the existence of a 5946

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER, 3 , 2009 / ASVINA 11 , 1931

WW1 Sri N. Sundaresan For the 2nd Party/ Management

WW2 Sri C.P. Radhakrishnan WW3 Sri G. Viswanathan Documents Marked on the petitioner's side

Ex. No. Date

Description

Ex. W1 1998-99 Annual employee's Provident Fund Statement of two of the concerned workmen .

Ex. W2 1999-2000 Annual Employee's Provident fund Statement of concerned workmen.

Ex. W3 January, 2001 Salary Register for the month of January, 2001 .

Ex.W4 March , 2001 Duty Roaster for the concerned workmen for the month of March, 2001 .

Ex. W5 24.12.2001 Letter from Petitioner Union No. 1 raising Industrial Dispute before the Asstt. Labour Commissioner (Central ) , Chennai .

Sept. , 2002

Ex.W6

Duty Roaster for the concerned workmen for the month of Sept. , 2002.

Ex.W7 03-04-2004 Letter from Governemtn of India , Ministry of Labour, New Delhi to Petitioner Union No. 1 .. EX.W8 April , 2004 Extracts from Complaint Register maintained by the Respondent .

Ex. W9

Extracts from Complaint Register maintained in Airlines House (2 sheets).

Ex. W10

Extracts from High Tension ( HT) Log Register maintained in Airlines House (2 sheets) .

ExW11

Extracts from Generator Register maintained in Airlines House ( 1 sheet) .

Ex.W12

Extracts from Complaint Register maintained in Service Complex ( 1 sheet).

Ex. W13

Extracts from High Tension ( HT) Log Register maintained in Service Complex ( 2 sheet) .

Ex. W14

Extracts from Generator Register Maintained in service complex ( 1 sheet).

[ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] Ex.W15 27-10-2002 Letter from the Respondent to M/sSri Kamatchi Electricals Re : Maintenance of Electrical Instal- lations for Indian Airlines estab- lishments with annexures .

Ex. W16 13-02-2002 Letter from Respondent formulating Technical Specifica- tions for fresh contract .

Ex.W17 24-09-2002 Letter from Respondent re: Upkeep/Maintenance of electrical installations for Indian Airlines .

Ex.W18

Entry Pass issued to members of Petitioner Union No.1 (9 sheets) .

Ex.W19

Extract from Telephone Index issued by the Respondent .

Ex. W20 ( series )- Index to typed set of documents Volume - 1 ( Plumbers and Carpenters) (S.No. 1 to S.No. 11 ) .

Ex.W21

Index to typed set of documents - Volume 1 ( Plumbers and Carpenters) (S.No.12).

Ex.W22 1994

Attendance Register of Plumbers Ex. W23 1996-97 Attendance Register of Plumbers Ex. W24 1997

Attendance of Plumbers and Carpenters.

Ex.W25 1998

Attendance Register of Plumbers and Carpenters .

Ex.W26 1998-99 Attendance Register of Plumbers and Carpenters .

Ex. W27 1999

Attendance Register of Plumbers and Carpenters .

Ex.W28 2000

Attendance Register of Plumbers and Carpenters.

Ex.W29 2001

Attendance Register of Plumbers Ex.W30 2001-2002 Attendance Register of Plumbers and Carpenters .

Ex.W31 2003

Attendance Register of Plumbers and Carpenters .

Ex.W32 2004

Attendance Register of Plumbers and Carpenters .

Ex.W33 1993-94 Complaint Register -Plumbing Ex.W34 1994

Complaint Register - Plumbing Ex.W35 1996-97

Complaint Register - Carpentary Ex.W36 1998

Complaint Register - Plumbing 5947 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

Ex.W64 2000-01

Ex.W37 1998

Complaint Register - Carpentry

Ex.W38 1999

Complaint Register - Plumbing

The Attendance Register for Plumbing and Carpentry workers for the year 2000-01

Complaint Register - Plumbing

Ex.W39 1998/99/2000

Ex.W65 Jan , 2002

Ex. W40 1999/2000 Complaint Register - Carpentry

The Attendance Register for Plumbing and Carpentry workers for the month of Jan , 2002 Complaint Register - Plumbing

Ex.W41 1998/99/2000

Ex.W66 July, 2002

Ex.W42 2000

Complaint Register - Plumbing

Ex. W43 2000

Complaint Register - Plumbing

The Attendance Register for Plumbing and Carpentry workers for the month of July , 2002 Ex.W44 2000-2004 Complaint Register - Plumbing Ex.W67 Aug , 2002

Ex.W45 2000

Complaint Register - Plumbing

The Attendance Register for Plumbing and Carpentry workers for the month of August, 2002 .

Ex.W46 2002

Complaint Register - Plumbing

Ex.W68 Sept. , 2002

Complaint Register - Plumbing

Ex.W47 2000/01/02/03

The Attendance Register for Plumbing and Carpentry workers for the month of September , 2002 Ex. W48 2000/01/02 Complaint Register -Carpentry

Ex.W69 Oct. , 2002

Ex.W49 2000/01

Complaint Register -Carpentry

Ex. W50 2001/02 Complaint Register -Plumbing

The Attendance Register for Plumbing and Carpentry workers for the month of October, 2002 Ex.W51 2002

Complaint Register - Carpentry Ex. W70 Nov, 2002

Ex.W52 2001/2002 Complaint Register -Plumbing

The Attendance Register for Plumbing and Carpentry workers for the month of November , 2002 Ex.W53 2002

Complaint Register -Plumbing

Ex.W71 Dec. 2002

Ex.W54 2002/2003 Complaint Register -Plumbing

The Attendance Register for Plumbing and Carpentry workers for the month of December , 2002 Ex. W55 2003

Complaint Register -Plumbing

Ex.W72 1998

Ex.W56 2002/2003 Complaint Register -Carpentry

The Complaint Register for Plumbing-year 1998

Ex. W57 2003

Complaint Register -Plumbing

Ex.W73 1998

Ex. W58 1999

The Complaint Register for Carpentry-year 1998 .

Ex. W74 1999-2000

The Complaint Register for Carpentry-year 1999-2000 The completion certificates issued during various dates during the year 1999 (48 numbers ofcertificate)

Ex. W75 2001

Ex.W59 2000

The Complaint Register for Plumbing-year 2001

ExW76 2000-2001

The completion certificates issued during various dates during the year 2000 (64 numbers ofcertificate)

The Complaint Register for Carpentry - year 2000-2001 Ex.W60 2001

ExW77 2002-03 &

2005

The Complaint Register for Plumb- ing- year 2000 /2001 /2002/2003/ 2005

The completion certificates issued during various dates during the year 2001 (89 numbers ofcertificate)

ExW78 2003-2004

Ex.W61 2002

The Complaint Register for Plumbing - year 2003-2004

ExW79 2004

The Complaint Register for Carpentry - year 2004 The completion certificates : issued during various dates during the year 2002 (82 numbers ofcertificate)

ExW80 2004

Ex.W62 2003

The Complaint Register for Carpentry - year 2004

ExW81 2005

The completion certificates issued during various dates during the year 2003 (215 numbers ofcertificate)

The Complaint Register for Plumbing and Carpentry - year 2005

Ex.W63 2004

ExW82 1987

The photographs taken during the year 1987 Ayuthe Pooja function (5 Nos. )

The completion certificates issued during various dates during the year 2004 ( 19 numbers ofcertificate) 5948

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 /ASVINA 11 , 1931

ExW83 1993

Photographs taken during the year 1993 Ayutha Pooja function (6Nos.)

[PART IL-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] ExW108 27-06-2005 Endorsement for satisfactory work

Ex.W109 Sept. 2002

ExW84 1999

Wage Register

Ex.W110 Sept. 2003

Photographs taken during the year 1999 Ayutha Pooja function ExW85 2000

EX.W111 Dec. 2003 WageRegister

ExW112 Jan 2004

Photographs taken during the year 2000 Ayutha Pooja function ExW86 2003

Wage Register

On the Management's side

Photographs taken during the year 2003 Ayutha Pooja function ExW87 1997-98 Plumbing Complaint Register Ex.W88 1998-99 Plumbing Complaint Register EX.W89 2000

Plumbing Complaint Register Ex.W90 2004

Plumbing and Carpentary Maintenance Register ExW91 2005

Plumbing and Carpentary Maintenance Register Ex. W92 2003

Attendance Register of Plumbing and Carpentary Employees EX.W93 -

Photo Identity Cards in respect of33 Sweeper/Cleaners EX.W94 23-04-99

Letter regarding service particulars of Sweepers /Cleaners Ex.W95 09-10-2000 Proceeding of the respondent regårding disbursement of wages to the sweepers / cleaners Ex.W96 10-07-2000 Wage Disbursement for June 2000 Ex .W97 09-08-2000 Wage Disbursement for July 2000 Ex.W98 08-09-2000 Wage Disbursement for August 2000

Ex.W99 October 2000 Wage Disbursement for October 2000

ExW100 July2001 Endorsement for satisfactory work

Ex. W101 03-07-2001 Endorsement for satisfactory work

EX.No. Date

Description

Ex.M ] 7-5-1987 ALC ( C ) , Madras granted eertificate of Registrationto IndianAirlines under Sub - Section (2) of Section - 7 of C.L. (R &A)Act , 1970

Ex. MIA-

Letter dated 22-06-1988 from ALC( C) , Madras amending Col 4 of Certificate of Registration to read as " Less than One hundred only"

Ex. MIB -

Letter dated 02-07-1991 from ALC ( C) , Madras amending Col 4 of Certificate of Registration to read as " More than 400 Labours " together with enclosures ( SI.No. 4(c) , (d), (f) are Sweeping/ Cleaning contractors

Ex. M2 3-3-1991 Office note ofFrecutive Engineer, IAL , Chennai on release of press advertisement of award of contract for upkeep maintenance workinrespect of premises of IAL at3 locations:

1 Main Booking Office

2. IA Housing Colony

3. Airlines House , Service Complex and IA offices at Airport premises

Ex. M3 31-3-1991

Ex .W10201-10-2001 Endorsement for satisfactory work

Ex.W103 03-12-2001 Endorsement for satisfactory work

Ex.W10401-07-2002 Endorsement for satisfactory work

ExW105 28-01-2005 Request for renewal Photo Passes Ex. W106 27-05-2005 Request for renewal of photo passes

Ex.W10730-05-2005 Endorsement for satisfactory work

Press clipping from Dinamani dated 31-03-1991 ( Page - 3 ) carrying the Tender Notice issued by IAL for the above work Ex . M4 28-5-1991 Office note together with the Committee on award of upkeep and maintenance contract of IA premises at 3 locations

1. Booking Office - M/ s T.Girija @Rs. 5990/ pm

2. IA Housing Colony - M/ s Vijayalakshml Sanitation Services @Rs. 54,940/-and [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

3. A/House , ISC etc. M/s T. Girija@ Rs . 9490/-p.m .

Ex.M5 2-8-1991

Letters from MPS , IAL to all Departmental/ Sectoral Heads of IAL, Chennai regarding the award of fresh contracts for upkeep maintenance in respect of 3 locations w.e.f. 01-08-1991 and instructions thereon

Ex. M6 5-1-1993

Office note on award of fresh contract for the period 1992-1993 pursuant to limited tenders floated for the above work from amongst theparties who responded to 1991 press advertisement dated 31-03-1991

Ex. M7 10-2-1993 Letter awarding contract of upkeep maintenance work of IA Housing colony premises to M/s TGirija for a period of 1 yearw.e.f. 01-03-1993 i.e. upto 28-02-1994 Ex. M8 10-2-1993 Letter awarding contract of upkeep maintenance work of IA premises at Airport to M / s Sudarson for a period of 1 year w.e.f. 01-03-1993 i.e. 28-02-1994 Ex . M9 30-3-1993 Letter from MPS , IAL to all Departmental /Sectional Heads of IAL, Chennai regarding the award of fresh contract M/ s M.S Sudarson for upkeep maintenance work in respect of Booking Offices and Airport premises and instructions thereon

Ex. M10 11-2-1994 Office copy of the Note suggesting to invite fresh tender for award of contract for upkeep and maintenance of Indian Airlines Premises Airlines House, Airport , Booking Offices and Housing Colony

Ex.M11 11-5-1994 Office Note on approval for publishing advertisement in leading newspapers inviting tenders for upkeep maintenance ofpremises of IAL for 3 locations Ex . M12 22-7-1994 Office note on approval for financial sanction for Rs . 16,000/- for releasing press advertisement for inviting tenders for upkeep maintenance

5949 Ex. M13 26-2-1995 Press release for pre -qualification notice in " Indian Express " and " Dinamani " for Sweeping and Cleaning works , Plumbing and Carpentry Maintenance for locations at Airlines House, Main Booking Office, Service Complex and IAOffices at Airport premises and operation/maintenance of Sewage Treatment Plant in IA Housing Colony

Ex. M14 13-4-1995 Report of the Committee after evaluation ofthe tenders received short listing 5 parties together with evaluation sheet of the parties for issuance of tender Ex. M15 16-5-1995 Notice inviting tenders from among the short listed parties for award of contract for upkeep maintenance work of IAL premises at 3 locations Ex. M16 18-5-1995 Letterfrom M/ s M.S. Sudarson , Civil&Maintenance Contractor , Madras - 11 requesting for issuance of tender documents in response to the above notice inviting tenders .

Ex. M17 18-5-1995 LetterfromM/ s Gokul Enterprises , Labour & Transport Contractor , Madras - 600013 requesting for issuance of tender documents in response to the above notice invitingtenders

Ex. M18 18-05-1995 Letter from M/ s . T. Girija , Contractor , Madras 600055 requesting for issuance of tender documents in response to the above notice inviting tenders alongwith authorization letter in favour of their personnel to receive the tender document .

Ex. M19 30-05-1995 . Submission ofduly filled in tender schedule by M/ s. Sudarson for the above work for IA premises at 3 locations

Ex. M20 31-05-1995 Submission ofduly filled in tender schedule by M/ s . M.S. Sudarson for the above work for IA premises at 3 locations Ex. M21 31-05-1995 Submission of duly filled in tender schedule by M/ s . Santham, 5950

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ ASVINA 11 , 1931

Contractors , PWD ( Registered) for the above work for IA premises at 3 locations Ex . M22 31-05-1995 Submission of duly filled in tender schedule by M/ s . Gokul Enterprises for the above work for IA premises ( Booking Offices and 1A Housing Colony)

Ex . M 23 31-05-1995

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] Ex. M32 8-9-1995

Letter No. IA Ltd/05 /95-96 of undertaking from M/s . T. Girija after discussion with the Committee

Ex. M33 8-9-1995 Letter of undertaking from M/ s. Santham after discussion with the Committee

Ex. M 34 8-9-1995 Letter of undertaking from M/ s . M.S. Sudarson after discussion with the committee Ex . M35 11-10-1995

Statement of the Tender Committee on opening of tenders (price bids) for upkeep maintenance work of Booking Offices

Ex . M24-31-05-1995 Statement of the Tender Committee on opening of tenders (price bids ) for upkeep maintenance work of IA Housing Colony

Ex . Μ 25 31-05-1995

Letter No. MAA : IR : UKM: 2228 awarding the contract of Upkeep andMaintenance of IAL Booking Offices at Chennai to M/s . T. Girija for period of 6 months on a trial basiswith effect from 16-10-1995 i.e. upto 15-04-1996 which can be confirmed as a regular contract uponsatisfactory performance for a further period of 30 months Ex . M36 11-10-1995

Statement of the Tender Committee on opening of tenders (price bids ) for upkeep maintenance work of Airlines House, Service Complex , Airport premises

Ex. M26 14-06-1995 Statement showing details of EMD paid by the tenderers together copies of Demand Drafts Ex. M 2707-07-1995 Letter No. :MAA : IR: dated 07-07-1995 from GM ( Personnel ) , IAL , Chennai addressed to the above 4 tenderers who had submitted theirprice bids for the above work , requesting the parties to indicate the no . of persons they would be engaging for the work . Last date forreceipt ofreply was 14-07-1995 Ex. M28 10-07-1995 Reply received from M/s . Gokul Enterprises in response to the above letter

Ex . M29 14-7-1995 Reply No. MS/ 1468/V11 /95 from M/ sM.S. Sudarson in response to the above letter

Ex. M 30 14-7-1995 Replyfrom M / s Santham in response to the above letter Ex. M 31 3-9-1995 Committee Report on award of Upkeep and Maintenance contract of IA premises at 3 locations together with the undertaking given by M / s . T.Girija and Santham

Letter No. MAA : IR: UKM : 2225 awarding the contract of Upkeep and Maintenance of IAL Housing Colony to M/ s . Santham for period of6 months on a trial basis with effect from 16-10-1995 i.e. upto 15-04-1996 which can be confirmed as a regular contract upon satisfactory performance for a further period of 30 months Ex . M 37 11-10-1995 Letter No. MAA : IR: UKM : 2225 awarding the contract ofUpkeep and Maintenance of Airlines House , Service Complex and IA office at Airport premises , Chennai to M/ s . M.S. Sudarson for period of 6 months on a trial basiswith effect from 16-10-1995 i.e. upto 15-04-1996 which can be confirmed as a regular contract uponsatisfactory performance for a further period of 30 months Ex. M 38 20-5-1996 Note approving confirmation of above contracts as regular contracts for 2½ years w.e.f. 16-04-1996 i.e. upto 15-10-1996 Ex . M39 25-7-1996 Letter No. MAA : IR : UKM: to M/s. Sudarson , confirming the contract of Upkeep and Maintenance of Airlines House , IA Offices at Airport premises , etc. for 2½ years w.ef. 16-04-1996 i.e. upto 15-10-1998 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

Ex . M 40 26-7-1996

5951

the condition that the existing contractual workers of M/ s . Santham to be retained for carrying out the work.

Ex. M 49 6-3-2000

Letter No. MAA : IR : UKM : 1882 to M/s . T. Girja , confirming the contract of Upkeep and Maintenance of IA Booking Offices for 2½ years w.e.f. 16-04-1996 i.e. upto 15-10-1998 Ex. M41 26-7-1996

Letter from M/ s . T. Girija stating that they are not interested to take up contract of Upkeep and Maintenance of IA Housing Colony only for 2 months.

Ex. M50 12-6-2000

Letter No MAA : IR : UKM: 1883 to M/ s . Santham , confirming the contract of Upkeep and Maintenance of IA Housing Colony for 2½ years w.e.f. 16-04-1996 i.e. upto 15-10-1998 Ex. M42 5-11-1998 Letter No : MAA : IR : UKM : 157 to M/s. Sudarson intimating continuation of the contract till further orders

Ex . M435-11-1998

Letter from Indian Airlines Ltd. to M/ s . T. Girija , Contractor , awarding the sweeping and Maintenance contract of IA Housing Colony for a period of 2years w.e.f. 01-07-2000 and also to retain the existing set of workers for the same .

Εχ .Μ 5130-11-2000

Letter No MAA : IR : UKM : 158 to M/ s. Santham Intimating continuation of the contract till further orders

Ex . M445-11-1998 Letter No : MAA : IR: UKM : 159 to M/ s . T. Girija intimating continuation of the contract till further orders

Ex . M45 9-4-1999

Letter to M/ s . Sudarson determining his contract viz. Upkeep maintenance of Airlines House, Service Complex , IA Offices at Airport, with immediate effect as they have not complied with the instructions given earlier .

Ex . M52 1-12-2000 LetterNo .: MAA: IR: UKMfrom GM (Personnel ), IAL addressed to the contractor M/ s . T. Girija entrusting the maintenance work of Airlines House, Service Complex and IA Offices at Airport with the same contractual workers .

Ex. M53 21-6-2001

Interim Order passed by Hon'ble High Court of Madras in WP No. 6030/1999 filed the workers of the Contractor for Upkeep and Maintenance of IA Housing Colony (Contractor - M/s . Santham). ( Interim Order directs to maintain status - quo and the WP ispending)

Ex . M46 30-10-1999

Letter No .: MAA : IR : UKM: 765 dated 21-06-2001 from IAL addressed to the contractor from M/ s . T. Girija on deficiency of service by their workers .

Letters No.:MAA:IR:UKM:

Ex . M54 31-12-2002

(series)

Letter from Contractor M/ s . Santham requesting for termination of the contract of Upkeep and Maintenance of IA Housing Colony and for relieving them from the contract w.e.f. 31-10-1999

Ex. M47 1-11-1999 Letter No. MAA : UKM : 3222 from IAL to M/s . Santham determing the contract for Upkeep and Maintenance of IA Housing Colony às to close of work on 31-10-1999

38 , No .: MAA : IR : UKM : 39 and No .: MAA: IR: UKM : 40 addressed to T. Girija on continuance of contract for upkeep and maintenance of IAL premises at 3 locations till 30-06-2003 .

Letters No .: MAA : IR : UKM:from Εχ . Μ55 12-8-2003 (series)

Ex . M48 1-11-1999 Letter No. MAA : UKM : 3223 from GM (Personnel ) , IAL addressed to the contractor M/ s . T. Girija asking them to take over the Upkeep and Maintenance of IA Housing Colony on trial basis on

IAL to M/ s . T. Girija extending the contract for upkeep and maintenance of IAL premises at 3 locations for a further period of 1 year w.e.f. 01-07-2003

Letters No. MAA : IR : UKM: 3033 , No. K. MAA : IR : UKM 3034 and Εχ . Μ 56 10-6-2004 (series) 5952

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 / ASVINA 11 , 1931

No. MAA: IR: UKM3035 from IAL to M/ s . T. Girija extending the contract for upkeep maintenance ofIAL premises at 3 locations for afurther period of 6 months w.e.f. 31-09-2004.

Ex. M57 28-9-2004 (series)

Letters No. MAA : IR : UKM : 4612, No. MAA : IR: UKM : 4613 and No. :MAA: IR: UKM : 4614 from IALto M/ s. T. Girija extending the contract for upkeep maintenance ofIAL premises at 3 locations for a further period of 6 months w.e.f. 01-10-2004.

Ex. M58 21-4-2005 (Series)

Letters No.: MAA: IR: UKM: MBO : 2581 , No.: MAA: IR : UKM: MBO : 2582 and No .; MAA: IR: UKM: IAHC: 2583 from 1AL to M/ s . T. Girija extending the contract for upkeep maintenance of IAL premises at 3 locations for a further period of 1 year w.e.f. 01-04-2005.

Ex. M59 11-3-1993 Bank Guarantee from State Bank of India for Rs . 10,940 .

Ex . M60 10-3-1996 Letter from M/ s . Sudarson to IndianAirlines intimating removal of2 persons from 07-03-1996 and replacing them with another 2 persons .

Ex. M61 Mar- June (series) 1996

Copy of LIC policies favouring the workmen of M/ s . Sudarson Contractors , Sembiam , Madras .

Ex. M62 6-5-1996

Letter from M/ s . Sudarson to Indian Airlines submitting a Bank Guarantee towards Security Deposit.

Ex .M63 22-5-1996 Letter from M/ s . RLC ( C) , Chennai addressed to M/ s . Sudarson intimating the revision of rates of DA .

Ex. M64 3-8-1996 PF Code allotment letter from office of Regional Commissioner Employees ' Provident Funds allotting PF Code No. TN/ 36163 to M/ s . Sudarson .

Ex . M65 31-8-1996 BankGuarantee from M/ s . Canara Bank , Egmore Chennai - 8 for an amount of Rs . 9300 executed by

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

M/ s. M.S. Sudarson in respect of the above contract.

Ex. M66 2-9-1996 Letter from RLC, Chennai to M / s . Sudarson granting licence for the above contract together with Licence No. L- 1 / 43 /96 dated 27-08-1996.

Ex.M67 18-8-1997 Letter from M/ s . Sudarson , Contractor intimating suspension w.e.f. 18-08-1997 of his worker Mr. Vaidyanathan for irregular attendance.

Ex. M68 30-8-1997 Endorsement by user departments onthe performance ofworkers of the contractor M/ s . Sudarson (Aug. '97 ) month - endorsement enclosed as sample .

Ex. M69 15-10-1997 Letter from ALC( C ) , Chennal addressed to M/ s . Sudarson renew ing the labour licence No. L1/43 / 96 upto 26-08-1998 for 33 workers .

Ex. M70 15-01-1998 Letter from Indian Airlines addressed to M/ s . Sudarson that the work carried out by him was not satisfactory and that to execute the same to the best satisfaction.

Ex . M71 02-04-1998 (series)

Letter from Canara Bank enclosing therewith a copy of the Bank Guarantee No. 3/98 dated 02-04-1998 for Rs . 9521 issued on behalf of M/ s . Sudarson .

Ex. M 72 21-08-1998- Letter from ALC( C) , Chennai addressed to M/ s . Sudarson renewing the labour license No. L1/43/96 upto 26-08-1999 for 33 workers.

Ex . M 73 07-09-1998 Letter from Indian Airlines addressed to M/ s . Sudarson that the work carried out by him was not satisfactory and that to execute the same to the best satisfaction .

Ex . M 74 10-06-1999 (series)

Letter from M/ s . M.S. Sudarson enclosing the Bank Guarantee for Rs. 1,25,0001 from Canara Bank , Egmore , Chennai - 8 together with enclosures .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

Ex. M75 27-10-1999 Letter from Indian Airlines addressed to M /s . M.S. Sudarson that the work carried out by him was not satisfactory and that to execute the same to the best satisfaction .

Ex . M76 24-11-2003 Letter No. : CW/U/03/356 from Petitioner Union No. II (Chennai Airport Contract Workers Union ) to Regional Manager , IAL , Chennai in the matter of default in remittance of PF contribution by the M/ s . M. S. Sudarson , Contractor.

Ex. M77 07-03-1993 Bank Guarantee for Rs 9000 from Canara Bank.

Εχ. Μ78 04-12-1996 ESI Code Allotment letter from Regional Director , ESI Corpo- ration, Chennai - 34 allotting ESI Code No. 51-55235-101 to M/s. T. Girija .

Ex. M79 July 1997 to Oct2004

Extracts of the Inspection Register of M/ s . T. Girija duly inspected by ESI authorities .

Ex M80 06-03-1997 PF Code allotment letter from Office of Regional Commissioner. Employees ' Provident Funds allotting PF Code No. TN/36576 toM/s . T. Girija .

Ex. M81 21-06-2000 Copy of Bank Guarantee from M/s. Girija for Rs . 38,000 in favour of Indian Airlines Ltd. for a period of2 years w.e.f. 17-07-2000 .

Ex. M82 July 2000 Copies ofESI ID Cards pertaining to the workmen of M/s . T. Girija .

Ex . M83 31-07-2000 CopyofDeclaration Forms (Form -3) submitted by the contractor M/s. T. Girija to ESI authorities in respect of their workmen .

ExM84 01-06-2001 Endorsement by user departments onthe performance of workers of the contractor M/ s . T. Girija (May 2001 ) month endorsement enclosed as sample .

Ex. M85 21-06-2001 Letter No. MAA : IR: UKM : 735 dated 21-06-2001 on deficiency of service by their workers .

Ex. M86 13-07-2001 Letter No. MAA : IR : UKM : 952 advising the contractor to visit the premises thrice a week .

3439G1/09-14

5953 Ex . M87 04-09-2001 Letter No. MAA: IR: UKM : 1955 on deficiency of service by their workers.

Ex. M88 08-06-2002 Letter No. CWU/02/ 162/ 163 dated 08-06-2002 from Petitioner Union II ( Chennai Airport Contract Workers Union) addressed to M/ s . T. Girija , Contractor , Chennai -55 in the matter ofuniform issued to the contractual workers .

-Ex . M89 09-07-2002 Letter No. M/M/W/CL-50 from Sr. Divisional Mechanical Engineer , Southern Railway , Chennai- 3 addressed to GM , IAL , Chennai seeking report on performance in connection with finalization of contract for intensive - cleaning of coaches in their organization EX.M90 13-07-2003 Letter No. CW/U/03 / 189-90from Petitioner Union No. II ( Chennai Airport Contract Workers Union) to M/s . T. Girija, Contractor in the matter of Annual Balance Sheet of PF Account in respect of workers employed as contract workers under Indian Airlines .

ΕΧ.Μ91 05-09-2003 Letter No. CW/U /03 /215-17 from Petitioner Union No..II (Chennai Airport Contract Workers Union ) to M/s . T. Contractor in the matter of Annual Balance Sheet of PF Account in respect of workers employed as contract workers under Indian Airlines .

ExM92 06-11-2003 Letter No. M46 ( 118 )/2003-05/ 1 from ALC ( C ), Chennai addressed to the contractor M/s . T. Girija enclosing the Contract Labour License.

Ex. M93 24-11-2003 Letter No. CW/U/03/352-55 from Petitioner Union No. II (Chennai Airport Contract Workers Union) to Regional Provident Fund Commissioner , Royapettah , Chennai- 14 on non- issuance of PF account in respect of workers employed by M / s . T. Girija as contract workers under Indian Airlines .

Ex. M94 02-02-1996 PF Code allotment letter from office of Regional Commissioner Employees ' Provident Funds allotting PF Code No. TN/MS / 5954

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 / ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] Ex.M102 25-01-1996

35749 to M/s. Santham Contractors , Madras - 27 .

Ex . M95 17-06-1996 ESI Code Allotment letter from Regional Director, ESI Corporation, Chennai - 34 allotting ESI Code No. 51-55215-101 to M/s . Santham Contractors , Madras-27.

Ex . M96 06-01-1997

Letter to shortlisted parties to purchase tender documents on payment of Rs . 100 ( with enclosure) ( 1. R. Vijayakumar 2. M/s . T. Girija 3. M/ s . Sri Ranga Electricals) .

Ex. M 103 06-2-1996 Tender submitted by M/ s . Sri RangaElectricals .

06-2-1996 Tender subimitted by M/s T. Girija.

Ex. M104 07-2-1996

Letter No. 51 -P - 11-22-1-96/ 11PN from ESI Corporation addressed to M/ s . Santham Contractors intimating the latter enhancement of wage ceiling from Rs . 3000 to Rs . 6500 for ESI coverage . on Ex. M97 November 97 Letter No. CO. ORD/IN/Publicity/ Regl . /97from Regional Provident Fund Commissioner , Chennai addressed to M/ s Santham Contractors , Chennai 27 intimating the enhancement in rate ofcontribution from 10% to 12% w.e.f. 22-9-1997 and advising them to remit contributions according- w.e.f. 22-9-1997 .

Ex. M98 15-2-1995 Office note No. MAA : CW:

Tender Opening Statement. 07-2-1996 Item -wise comparative statement .

Ex. M105 29-3-1996 Letter No. SRFD : F & B : PLUMBING: 63 1'0 from Finance Department to Deputy Manager (CivilEngineering) conveying Regional Director's approval for award of above work to M/ s . Sri Ranga Electricals for 7 sets of Plumber /Helper and a Plumbing Supervisor.

Ex. M 106 01-4-1996 Letter No. MAA : CW: 133 awarding plumbing maintenance contract to M/ s . Sri Ranga Electricals for one year w.e.f. 1-4- 1996 alongwith terms and conditions i.e. upto 31-3-1997 .

Ex. M 107 30-05-1997

14.12: 408 from Manager ( CE) , 1AL, Chennai on pre- qualification notice inviting applications from reputed contractors for pre- qualfication and enlisting in carrying out plumbing maintenance work , carpentry maintenance work , etc. Ex. M99 20-2-1995

Letter No. MAA: CW : 143 extending the Plumbing Maintenance contract to Mis Sri Ranga Electricals for two years w.e.f. 01-04-1997 for Rs . 38566 per month on the same terms and conditions i.e. upto 31-03-1999 .

Ex. M 108 15-02-1999

Letter No. MAA : IR from GM(Personnel ) , IA , SR, Chennai to Sr. Manager (Public Relations ) conveying approval for release of advertisement .

Ex. M100 26-2-1995

Letter from M/ s . Sri Ranga Electricals expressing their willingness to continue the contract .

Ex . M 109 19-05-1999

Release of advt . in Indian Express and Dinamani Applications were inviting for pre - qualification and enlistment for award of contract for upkeep maintenance , carpentry maintenance , plumbing maintenance of lAL premises .

Office Note No. MAA : CW: Plumibing: 1215 on extension of contract for the period of one year from01-04-1999 to 31-3-2000.

Ex . M 110 07-06-1999

Ex. M101 09-08-1995 Office Note No. MAA : IR: CW of the Committee Members on security of applications received for pre - qualification and enlistment of 3 parties for plumbing maintenance work.

Letter No. MAA : CW : 1261 extending the contract of plumbing maintenance in IAL premisesfor 1 year w.e.f. 0-04-1999 i.e. upto 31-03-2000 (Rate/per month- Rs 46,131 Other terms and conditions remain same) .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत काराजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3, 2009/आश्विन् 11 , 1931

5955 Ex. M120 03-07-2003

Ex . M 111 07-03-2000 Office Note No. MAA : CW: 15 : 20: DRR: 5 : 184 on extension of contract for the period of two years from 01-04-2000 .

Ex . Μ 112 07-04-2000

Draft of tender notice addressed to 19 parties inviting tenders from enlisted contractors for plumbing maintenance of IA premises together with the list of parties .

ExM121 23-07-2003

Letter No MAA : CW : PMC : 276 extending the contract by 1 year w.e.f.01-04-2000 for Rs . 46,131 per month i.e. upto 31-03-2001.

Ex. M113 15-02-2000 Office Note No. MAA : CW PMC 174 on extension of contract for another 2 years with effect from 01-04-2001 to 31-03-2001 .

Ex . Μ114 04-05-2001

Copy of Interim Order dated 17-07-2003 in WMP No. 24844 of 2003 in WP No. 19883/2003 filed by Chennai Airport Contract Workers Union ( Interim Order directing Indian Airlines to maintain status- quo until further orders).

Ex. M122 23-07-2003

Letter No. MAACW 1974PMC445 extending the contract of plumbing maintenance in IAL premises for 2 years w.e.f. 01-04-2001 i.e. upto 31-03-2003.

ExM115 12-04-2003

Letter No. MAA : PER : 2858 from Personnel Department , IAL Chennai forwarding a copy ofthe above Interim Order to Sr. Manager (Civil Engineering ), IAL , Hyderabad to ensure compliance of the directions of the Court .

Ex. M123 09-08-1995

Office Note No. MAA : CW: AMC: PL: CAR: 156bearing Regional Director's approval for extension of contract for the further period of4 months wef 01-04-2003. i.e. upto 31-07-2003 .

Ex. M116 06-06-2003

Report of Committee on shortlisting of parties for carpentry maintenance in IA premises at Madras.

Ex. M124 06-02-1996

Letter No. MAA : CW : PMC : 367 extending the contract upto 31-07-2003 .

Ex . M117 14-07-1999

Copy of the tender submitted by M/sSanthan quoting their rates for carpentry maintenance of IA premises at Madras together with EMD receipt .

Ex .M125 06-02-1996

Copy of the tender submitted by M/sT. Girija quoting their rates for carpentry maintenance of IA premises at Madras .

Ex. M126 07-02-1996

Press advertisement in " The Hindu" inviting applications from reputed parties for enlisting of contractors for various works , including plumbing maintenance in Indian Airlines , Southern Region issued by Sr. Manager (Civil Engg . ) , IAL, Southern Region.

Ex. M118

Tender Opening Statement .

Ex. M127 30-03-1996

Extracts from the register showing the details of applications submitted by various parties in response to the above advertise- ment (Page No. 2/3 to Page No. 246/247).

Copy of the office note on award of contract of carpentry maintenance of IA premises at Madras to the lowest tenderer M/s T Girija together with itemwise comparative statement .

Ex. M128 23-02-1996

Extracts from the register showing the details of contractors who have been enlisted for carrying water supply and sanitary works (Page No. 300/301 to Page No. 304/305) .

Ex. M119

Letter No. SRFD: F & B: Carpentry: 6300 from Finance Department to Dy. Manager (Civil Engineering ) conveying Regional Director's approval for award of above work toM/s T. Girija .

Ex. M129 01-04-1996

Copy ofsample letters addressed to eligible applicants regarding their enlistment in the register of approved contractors of IAL for certain works .

Letter No. MAA : CW: 134 awarding the contract of carpentry maintenance of IA premises in Madras to M/ s T. Caija with 5956

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ ASVINA 11 , 1931

effect from 01-04-1996 for a period of one year for a monthly consideration of Rs . 10,300 (2 pages).

Ex. M130 11-08-1997 Copy of office note MAA : CW:

321 on re -tendering of carpentry maintenance of IA premises in Chennai .

Ex. M131 11-10-1997 Copy of Notice Inviting Tender MAA: CW: Carpentry maintenance/ 509 addressed to 8 parties.

Ex. M132 31-10-1997 Copy of tender submitted by

M/ s P Krishnan , Chennai - 59 together with EMD receipt .

Ex. M133 05-12-1997 Copy of Office Note No. MAA : CW:21 :Carpentry maintenance/ 658 on award of contract for carpentry maintenance of IA premises at Chennai to M/s P. Krishnan together with its enclosure .

Ex.M134 12-01-1998 Copy of letter no . MAA : CW: 15- 20: Carpentry maintenance : 750 awarding the contract for carpentry maintenance to M/s P. Krishnan for a period of one year w.e.f. 15-01-1998 together terms and conditions .

Ex. M135 15-09-1998 Letter from Contractor M/s P.

Krishnan requesting for payment of arrears for his workers arising out increase in Basic + DA of minimum wages witheffect from 01-04-1998 .

Ex . M136 13-11-1999 Request from contract for

extension of contract for a further period of two years on the same terms and conditions .

Ex. M137 14-01-1999 Letter No. MMA : CW : CARP : 916

extending the contract for carpentry maintenance of IAL premises for a further period of two years w.e.f. 15-01-1999 .

Ex. M138 04-06-1999 Letter from ESI Corporation

addressed to contractor M's . P. Krishnan advising him to remit ESI contribution in principal employer's code- contractors copy and principal Employer's copy .

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( i) ) Ex M139 09-12-1999 Letter from contractor M/ s . P.

Krishnan seeking permission to remit ESI contribution for his workers under IAL ( Principal Employers) code.

Ex. M140 01-02-2000 Copy of pay in slip for contri- bution of ESI in principal employer's code(51-3673).

Ex. M141 09-08-2000 Letter from contract addressed to

IAL submitting ESI declaration forms in respectofhis workers for onward despatch to ESI office .

ExM142 11-08-2000 Letter No. MAA : IR: 21 : 5630 from

IAL to ESI forwarding ESI declaration forms submitted by contraetor M/ s . P.Krishnan in respect of his workers .

Ex M143 16-12-2000 Copy of office note MAA : CW

CARMNT 1154 on extension of the contract for a further period of two years on the same terms and conditions .

Ex. M144 21-02-2001 Letter No.MAA : CW : CARP :

renewing the contract for a further period of two years w.e.f. 15-01- 2001.

Ex. M145 04-07-2003 Draft of tender notice addressed

to48 parties inviting tender forms enlisted contracts for carpentry maintenance of premises together with the list of parties .

Ex. M146 18-11-1990 Press Advt . in Leading English

and Tamil Dailies inviting tenders for award of contract for Electrical maintenance of various establishments of IA at Madras .

Ex. M147 05-12-1990 Tender documents submitted by

M/s.Kamatchi Amman Electricals , Madras in respect to the above Advt.

Ex .M148 26-02-1990 Office Note on approval for award of electrical maintenance of IA electrical Installations at Madras .

Ex. M149 02-03-1991 Financial sanction for award of

electrical maintenance contract to M/s. Kamatchi Amman Electricals conveyed by Finance Department. Ex . M150 28-03-1991 Letter to M / s . Kamatchi Amman

Electricals awarding the contract for one year from 01-04-1991 .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

Ex. M151 11-04-1991 Copy of Licence bearing No. L- I/ 27, 191 dated 11-04-1991 Issued by ALC ( c ) , Madras to M/ s . Kamatchi Amman Electricals , Madras .

Ex. M152 20-04-1992 Extension of the contract awarded

to M/ s : Kamatchi Amman Electricals by two years w.e.f. 01-04-1992.

Ex. M153 17-07-1994 Press clipping from The Hindu dt .

17-07-1994 inviting application from contractors for prequali- fication and short listing of contractors for Electrical Maintenance of Indian Airlines Ltd. Establishments at Chennai .

Ex.M154

Listof parties who had responded to the above advt .

Ex . M155 27-07-1994 Application submitted by M/ s .

Kamatchi Amman Electricals in response to the above Advt . enclosing their credentials ..

Ex. M156 12-09-1994 Blank form of the Tender documents issued to the short- listed parties.

Ex. M157 20-09-1994 Letter from Dy. Controller , Ground

Support, Indian Airlines Ltd. Madras to Dy . Manager stores and purchase , IA, Madras forwarding 8 set of blank documents to be sent the eight shortlisted parties .

Ex. M158 04-10-1994 Office copy of Letter forwarding

the Tender forms to the 8 shortlisted parties .

Ex.M159 26-10-1994 Duly filled in Tender submitted by M/s . Kamatchi Amman Electricals Ex. M160 16-12-1994 Letter from M/s . Kamatchi Amman Electricals on their revised offer.

Ex. M161 28-12-1994 Office Note on award of contract

for Maintenance of electrical installation of IA establishment including Quarters at Madras .

Ex. M162 03-01-1995 Approval of R.D. ( South ) for awarding the above contract to M/s. Kamatchi Amman Electricals .

Ex. M163 18-01-1995 Award of contract for

Maintenance of electrical installations of 1A establishments (including House Colony) to M/s. Kamatchi Amman Electricals

5957

for a period of two years w.e.f. 01-02-1995.

Ex, M164 15-02-1995 Copy of Receipt on remittance of

Rs . 25920/ by M/ s . Kamatchi Amman Electricals towards security Deposit ( Receipt No 70391) .

Ex. M165 15-04-1995 Copy of workmen's Compensa-

tion policy from New India Assurance Co.Ltd . for person engaged byM/s . Kamatchi Amman Electricals ( Policy No. W.C. 4171240200059) .

Ex.M166 17-04-1995 Copy of letter dt. 17-04-1995 from

StoreDepartment forwarding the original Bank Guarantee executed by Bank of Baroda in lieu of further Security Deposit .

Ex .M167 19-04-1995 Letter from M / s . Kamatchi

Amman Electricals for refund of the amount deposited towards Security Deposit.

Ex.M168 25-02-1997 Extension of contract by3 months on same terms and conditions (i.e. upto 30-04-1997).

Ex . M169 01-05-1997 Office Note for renewal of the

contract on the existing terms for one more year w.e.f. 01-05-1997 (i.e. upto 30-04-1998).

Ex. M170 10-05-1997 Letter dt. 10-05-1997 extending the contractby 1year from 01-05-1997 (i.e.30-04-1998) .

Ex .M171 07-04-1998 Letterdt . 07-04-1998 extending the contract by 1 year from 01-05- 1998 (i.e. 30-04-1999) .

Ex.M172 20-03-1999 Letter extending the contract by3.

months from 01-05-1999 ( i.e. upto 31-07-1999) .

Ex. M173 05-10-1999 Letter dt. 05-10-1999 Dy. General

Manager (Ground Support) to General Manager ( P) requesting him to approve the draft of the fresh tender to be floated through S& P Dept.

Ex. M174 15-10-1999 Letter extending the contract by 3 months from 01-11-1999 ( i.e.upto 01-02-2000).

Ex. M175 19-01-2000 Letter from Dy. (GM .) to stores Dept. to renewal the contract which was expiring on 31-01-2000 .

5958

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 / ASVINA 11 , 1931

Ex. M176 02-02-2000

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Ex. M185 07-04-2002

copy of Letterdt . 02-02-2000 extending the contract by six months w.e.f. 01-02-2000 ( i.e. upto 31-07-2000) .

Tender submitted by M/ s . M.Κ. Enterprises under their covering letter dt . 07-04-2002 .

Ex .M186 07-04-2002

Ex M177 23-07-2000

Tender submitted by M / s . Kamatchi Amman Electricals , Chennai under their covering letter dt . 08-04-2002 .

Ex. M187 08-04-2002

Note from Ground Support Department to General Manager (Personal ) to clarify whether to renew the contract or call for fresh tenders.

Ex . M178 16-08-2000

Tender submitted by M/ s . Sri Ranga Electricals , Chennai - 78 under their covering letter 08-04-2002.

Ex. M188 08-04-2002

Office Note for approval of extension of the contract awarded to M/ s . Kamatchi Amman Electricals for a further period of one year ( i.e. upto 31-07-2000).

Ex . M179 27-07-2001

Tender submitted by M/ s . Radiant Engineers , Chennai - 45 under their covering letter dated 08-04-2002 .

Ex. M189 08-04-2002

Tender submitted by M/s . Pearl Electrical Services , Chennai -49 under their covering letter dated 08-04-2002 .

Ex. M190 08-04-2002

Formation of Committee to open the tenders received.

Ex.M191 10-04-2002

Award of maintenance of electrical installations of IA establishments at Chennai including Housing Colony & Booking office for a further period ofone year i.e. from 01.08.2000 to 01-07-2001 together with the enclosures.

Ex. M180 13-07-2001 Office Note for extension of the contract of M/s . Kamatchi Amman Electricals .

Letter from Stores Department forwarding the Demand Drafts submittedby the parties towards EMD

Ex.M192 11-09-2002

Ex.M181 18-09-2002 Letter dt. 18-09-2001 extending the contract of M /s . Kamatchi Amman Electricals upto 31-12-2001 .

Copy of Labour Licence issued by ALC ( C) , Chennai to M/s . Kamatchi Amman Electricals with validity upto 07-07-2003 .

Ex .M193 12-09-2002

Ex . M182 13-02-2002

Letterdt . 12-09-2002 extending the contract ofM/s . Kamatchi Amman Electricals upto 31-10-2002 .

Ex.M194 05-11-2002

Office Note from Ground Support Dept. for approval for inviting fresh tenders for award of contract by floating limited tenders ( from 11 parties who were earlier short listed 2 years ago after paper advertisement ) together with draft tender schedule .

Letter dt . 05-11-2002 from M/s. Kamatchi Amman Electricals to IAL enclosing a copy of ESI Code allotment letter ( ESI Code No. 51-55561-101 ) .

Ex . M195 05-11-2002

Ex. M183 14-03-2002 Abstract ofTender form No. MST/ 01/ CMB/ 215 dated 14-03-2002 sent to the short listed parties Last date for submission 08-04-2002 .

Ex .M184 19-03-2002

Office Note on award of contract for maintenance of electrical installation of IAL establishments at ( a) Airlines , ( b ) Service Complex, (c) Main Booking Office, (d) Airport , ( e ) IA Housing Colony.

Ex.M196 22-11-2002

Letter dt . 22-11-2002fromGM (Finance) to Dy. General Manager GS conveying the Approval of financial sanction for the award ofcontract for the above work for the five locations .

Ex. M197 27-11-2002

Letter to the parties to who tender forms were sent advising them to quote for each of item as mentioned in Annexure ' A ' , ' B ' , 'C' ' D' and ' E ' separately i.e. rated to be quote separately for the following area. ( a) Airlines House area, (b) Service Complex (c) Main Booking Office , ( d ) Airport Terminal Building, ( e) Indian Airline Ltd House Colony .

Purchase Order No. MST/ 2002/ CMS/ 1536 dt 27-11-2002 awarding 5959 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

premises at Domestic and International Terminal Building) by one year i.e. upto 30-11-2004 .

Ex. M206 03-01-2004

contract to M/ s . Kamatchi Amman Electricals for Airlines House Motor Transport Section Complex and offices of Export Cargo Complex for a period of one year from 01-12-2002 to 30-11-2003.

Εχ . Μ198 28-11-2002

Letter No.MST/03 / CMS/ extending the contract of M/s. Kamatchi Amman Electricals (for entire service complex area) by one year i.e. upto 30-11-2004 .

Ex . M207 03-01-2004 Letter No. MST/03/ CMS / 2233 Purchase Order No. MST/2002/ CMS/ 11545 awarding contract to M/ s , Kamatchi Amman Electricals for the 1AL premise at Domestic & International Terminal Building for a period of one year from 01-12-2002 to 30-11-2003 .

extending the contract of M/s. Kamatchi Amman Electricals (MainBooking Office Area) by oneyear i.e. upto 30-11-2004.

Εχ . Μ208 03-01-2004 Letter No. MST/ 03 / CMS/ 2234 Εχ. Μ199 28-11-2002

extending the contract of M/s . Sri Ranga Electricals ( for IAL Housing Colony) by one year i.e. upto30-11-2004.

Purchase Order No. MST/ 2002/ CMS/ 1543 awarding contract to M /s. Kamatchi Amman Electricals for the entire service Complex area for a period of one year from 01-12-2002 to 30-11-2003 .

Ex. M209 26-10-2004 Office Note from Ground Support Ex . M200 28-11-2002

Department for extension of the above contracts for a further period of one year effective 01-12-2004 .

Ex.M210 04-11-2004 Finance sanction conveyed by Purchase Order No. MST/2002 / CMS/ 1544 awarding contract to M/ s . Kamatchi Amman Electricals for 1A main Booking Office area for a period of one year from 01-12-2002 to 30-11-2003 .

Ex . M201 28-11-2002

RD ( South) for extension of the above contracts for one year from 01-12-2004 .

Ex. M211 30-12-2004 Extension of validity of contract Purchase Order No. MST / 2002/ CMS/ 1546 awarding contract to M/s . Ranga Electricals for the area IA Housing Colony for a period of one year from 01-12-2002 to 30-11-2003 .

Ex . M202 11-11-2003 Office Note on extension of the

upto 30-11-2005 to M/ s . Kamatchi Amman Electricals ( Airlines House Complex, Motor Service Complex and Offices at Export Cargo Complex) .

above five contracts for a further period two years from 01-12-2003.

Ex . M212 30-12-2004 Extension of validity of contract Ex .M203 16-12-2003

upto 30-11-2005 to M/ s . Kamatchi Amman Electricals (IA Offices at Domestic Terminal Building and International Terminal Buildings) .

Letter from General Manager (Finance) conveying the Finance sanction for the above five contracts as approved by RD (South).

Ex. M213 30-12-2004 Extension of validity of contract Ex . M204 03-01-2004

upto 30-11-2005 to M/ s . Kamatchi AmmanElectricals ( Entire Service Complex Area).

Letter No. MST/ 03 / CMS / 2230 of extending contract M/s. Kamatchi Amman Electricals (electrical maintenance of Airlines House, Motor Transport Complex and offices at Export Cargo Complex) upto 30-11-2004.

Ex.M214 30-12-2004 Extension of validity of contract upto 30-11-2005 to M /s . Kamatchi Amman Electricals ( Main Booking OfficeArea).

Ex. M205 03-01-2004 Letter No. MST/03/CMS/2232 extending the contract of M/s. Kamatchi Amman Electricals (electrical maintenance of IAL

Ex. M215 30-12-2004 Extension of validity of contract upto 30-11-2005 to M/ s . Sri Ranga Electricals ( IA Housing Colony) 5960

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ ASVINA 11 , 1931

नई दिल्ली, 31 अगस्त, 2009

Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) ofsub -section ( 1 ) and sub - section ( 2A ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

का.आ. 2718.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैं बी. सी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में , केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 58/97.) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-8-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

" Whether the demand of the workman . Sh . Bhola Singh regarding reinstatement in the employment as Overman in Basudeopur Colliery and full wages against the work done by him during 6-5-1992 to 17-5-1993 is justified? If so , to what relief is the workman entitled? "

[सं. एल-20012/129/1996- आई.आर ( सी -1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 31st August, 2009

S.O. 2718.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 58/97 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court , No. I , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relationto the management of M / s . BCCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 30-6-2009 .

[No .: L- 20012/ 129/ 1996-1R ( C- 1 ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1. DHANBAD

In the matter of a reference U/ S.10 ( 1 ) ( d) (2A ) of the 1.D. Act.

REFERENCE NO . 58 OF 1997

PARTIES :

Employers in relation to the management of Basudeopur Colliery of M / s . B.C.C.Ltd.

AND

Their Workmen

Present : Shri H. M. Singh , Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES

For the Employers : Shri D. K. Verma, Advocate

For theWorkman : Shri D. Mukherjee, Advocate

State : Jharkhand

Industry: Coal.

Dated , the 25th August, 2009

AWARD

2. The written statement has been filed by the concerned workınan stating that he had completed his Overmanship examination from Bhaga Mining Institute and accordingly he was sent for vocational training of Basudeopur Colliery of M/ s . B.C.C.L. from 23-3-91 to 6-5-91 . The aforesaid training was imparted to the concerned workınan without any pay as per direction of the Koyla Bhawan of M/ s . B.C.C.L. under letter No. BCCL/ GM/ HRD / F - 66/94/ 59 dated 21-3-91 . He was further allowed to under go a Post Diploma Training ( PDPT ) for the subsequent period i.e. 7-5-91 to 5-5-92 and for that the management of M / s . BCCL had paid the concerned workınan regular stipend for the period 7-5-91 to 5-5-92. After completion of two years training period succesfully and to the satisfaction of the management , the inanagement of Basudeopur Colliery being satisfied with the performance of the workman , allowed him to perform regular and permanent duty of an Overman against regular and permanent vacancy from 6-5-92 and since then he had been working as permanent Overman against permanent vacancy to the satisfaction of the management. The concerned workman had been working as Overman and was maintaining all the requisite satutory records and documents as per Mines Act , Rules and Regulations . The concerned workman had been working continuously as overman under the direct control and supervision of the management and he had been rendering services and producing goods for the benefit of the colliery management . He had been working as a permanenet workman as per direction and knowledge of the competent person and the concerned workman had put in more than 316 days attendance in the calendar year from 6-5-92 to 17-5-93 . But unfortunately the management did not offer him his regular wages of Overman for the period 6-5-92 to 17-5-93 and as soon as the concerned workman started demanding his regular wages the management stopped him from service w.e.f 17-5-93 without assigning any reason and without following the mandatory provisions of law . The concerned workman represented before the management several times against the illegal and arbitrary terinination of service by stopping the concerned workman from service but without any effect . Thereafter the concerned workman By Order No. L -20012 / 129/96-1R ( C - 1 ) dated 24/25-2-97 the Central Government in the Ministry of 5961 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

automatically terminated after the expiry ofthe said one year oftraining.

(ii) You will be paid stipend of the rate approved by the Government of India.

(iii) During the period of training you shall abide byall the rules and regulations of the company asapplicable.

raised the dispute before the L.E.C. (C) , Katrasgarh and in pursuance of that an enquiry was conducted by the Labour Enforcement Officer, Katrasgarh and a report was submitted by the L.E.O to the effect that the concerned workman had been rendering permanent service and had put in more than 240 days attendance in a calendar year . In spite of the aforesaid fact the anti - labour management did not take any cognizance and so the concerned workman raised as industrial dispute before the A.L.C (C) , Dhanbad but the same ended in failure due to the adamant attitude ofthe management. Thereafter the appropriate Government referred this dispute to this Hon'ble Tribunal for adjudication.

Ifyou are interested in accepting this offer, you may writetothis office with all original certificate and two photocopies thereof alongwith five copies of pass port size photographs attested by the Principal ofthe Institute within15days."

It has been prayed before this Tribunal to answer the reference in favour of the workman by directing the management to reinstate the concerned workman with full back wages and other attendant benefits .

Inresponse tothe above mentioned offer Bhola Singh who had already taken up and done vocational training in theBasudeopur Colliery from 23-3-91 to 6-5-91 free of cost, gave his letter of acceptance ofall conditions on 6-5- 91 and requested the GM(HRD ) to accept his joining as PDPT training . Consequent to the acceptance of offer by Bhola Singh of the offer given to him through letter dated 22/26-4-91 , the said Bhola Singh was allowed totake underground practical training in Basudeopur Colliery of Sijua Area for one year with immediate effect as the post Diploma Practical Training under the Apprentice Act, 1961 on the following conditions :-

(a) "His training will automatically be terminated after the expiry of one year .

(b) He shall have no claim for service in the company on the basis of the training.

(d) He will be entitled to 12 days casual leave and 15 days sick leave within the entire period of one year apprenticeship as laid down under theApprentice Act .

(e) He will abide by the rules and regulations of the company as applicable to him .

(f) He shall produce a copy of photograph duly attested by an officer of this department to the Agent/Manager of the colliery ." 3. Written Statement has been filed by the management stating that the entire demand as raised by Bhola Singh is misconceived , misconstrued and ill motived. The whole exercise is an example of a glaring litigation through which a litigant non - workman , namely, Bhola Singh has tried to procure a job for himself from the management of BCCL on a framed and cooked up dispute . There is absolutely no employer- employee relationship between the management of Basudeopur Colliery and the so called workman , Bhola Singh , and , therefore , no provisions of the I.D. Act, 1947 are attracted , and hence the present reference is bad and not maintainable. Since Bhola Singh had no employment in the colliery, therefore, no retrenchment did over take place , thus his reinstatement is simply irrelevant and ill motived . Similarly Bhola Singh's claim for the wages for the period ofwork donei.e. from6-5-92 to 17-5-93 is entirely a cooked up one and has no truth about it, the version of Bhola Singh renders the whole references void: It has been submitted that Bhola Singh is a son of an ex -employee of Katras Area No. IV, Adalat Singh who is living with his father near Basudeopur Colliery premises and since he is a man of rangdar type, he has been trying to obtain a job in the colliery by employing all sorts of methods , fair and foul with the aid of Government officials . It has been stated that on the recommendations of the Regional Central Apprenticeship Adviser ( RCAA) , for one year practical training as PDPT (Mining), the BCCL management had agreed to offer him training facility in the underground mine of the Basudeopur Colliery vide Ref. No. GM/ (HRD)/2.03/91/834 dated 22/26-4-91 on the following conditions :-

After the expiry of training period 7-5-91 to 5-5-92 as per above terms and condition of Apprenticeship Act . Bhola Singh's PDPT training was automatically terminated . Bhola Singh was never appointed in the company much leas as Overman in Basudeopur Colliery. Bhola Singh was an apprentice from 7-5-91 to 5-5-92 and he was never a workman by dint ofappointment in BCCL and (i ) " The company will have no responsibility of providing you with any appointment whatsoever and your training period will be

3439 G1/09-15 135962

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ ASVINA- 11 , 1931

( 1) PARTILISE 3 ( ii ) ] ed ! therefore,the provision of DisAct147sis attracted in his case. The demandsoftBrela Singh regarding his reinstatement in the employment, as Overman in Basdeopur Devifiery is unjustified, legal and violative of conditions of offer of PDPT Paining οπτανού είνα

abide

bion lindaphasunen bagiya Hole Tribunal be been prayed that Hon'ble asgraciously pleased to hold that the demand of the workman, Bhola Singh is not justifiedand legal .

γει τον τρίτο α4. Both the parties have filed theirtheir respective rejoinders admitting andand denying the contents of some of

the paragraphs of eaeach other's written statement. stutidant ort to lequel on va bolestie alergolong

bros concerned workmanicompleted PDPT (Mining) Training ad for oneyear from 6-5-91 . Ext . We histonly the letter for giving 28 % training Extra is sertificate for obtaining practical bonexperience from: 7-51814575-92.1ExtW- 3 is also certificate inom ticket for treatment which has been given to the concerned beri from615-82 to 17593 ; Ext. WoAds for Loverman'a certificate 16 under Coal Mines Regulations, 1957 Ext is outdoor workman. This does not show that he was an employee of boonthe management. It only shows that medical facility has shur been provided to the concernedconcerned workman In this respect the evidence of management's witness is very important. το MW stated in examination - in - chiefthat Presently, I am posted as Dy . C.M.E at E.C.L. Headquarter: Between December, 1990 to 1995 I had worked in Basdeopur Colliery Owlif different capacities. These who arediploma Holders were denie 5. The workman has produced trinhselfrad WW - 1 and has provedproved documents , Exts . W- 1 toto . W- 6 . The Management has produced MW- 1 Subhas Chandra Ray, who has proved documents, Ext.M - 1 to M -4. C-001 12-2- c mon wosure oris

-20 no amóti Main argument advancedlon behalf of the grooncerned workman is that he should be reinstated in the Ermah with full back wages against borsthervorkudenterby himinhlethis respect the concerned vd employmentas Overman withef Ael workman has stated in his lobstexamination at page 2 thide Porche insttime Thad been to Basleopur Colliery. 1200 came there only to receive training only as vocational or 10 PDPPO The vocational training was for one year! The vocational training was on the recommendation of prie

od botsmalyan Bhawani ,The Welfare Department has recommended for PDPT training on the basis of letter on written by Bhaga Mining Institute. He further stated that

die didnot accept the conditions mentioned in Ext.M - 1 and he has accepted his sigriature on Ext M - 1 . Again in cross -

examination, the above witness stated that he worked upto 5-5-92. After completion of apprenticeship I had received isappointment letter from BCCL . Thave filed that that appointment letter . Again says- I have not gone through if that

onscappointment has been filed by me Thatappointment letter To bois not with me was putting my attendance in the

trattendance registerat Basdeopur Colliery . Again says - i was not making any attendancen there !He has stated at

page 5 that I have not filed any statutory paper which is 2 ) required to be filto be filed for going requ filed for going into underground mine . This statement ofof thethe concemedconce workman shows that he has

Viub mot donework with the management. Ext.M- i is only offer srit cofritmining facilities BDPT ( Mirting) by the management

2-31102-2-03-2 and in this letter wbicht been offered, it has been specifically mentioned that after expiry of training period it willbe

ft #sed 280 תנועה adt being given the training of post Diploma Practical Training. The concerned person , Bhola Singh , had undergone the said training He had undergone two types of trainings , one was vocational and another, was PDPT. Vocational training is imparted without the benefit of stipend . After the completion of training the concerned person appli before the Director General of Mines Safety tofor grant of certificate for appearance in the examination conducted by GMS. In the prescribed form of trainees itself the said certificate is being granted by the concerned colliery. Those whowho areare allowed to go for PDPT training areare given stipend also. The certificate granted by the comery for practical frainintraining is submitted before the office of DOMS. If the concerned person would have submitted the said certificate in the office ofDGMS the same must have been tyinglover therethere . The copy of such certificate is not being maintained GIRLY DE RI ORESTRY so IBGMST the odt mot ber By concerned colliery. The concerned workman was never appointed in the concerned colliery. The claim of the concerned workman that after the completion of his training he was being appointed by the concerned colliery is not correct. Further the claim of the concerned workman that the work was taken from him by the management of the concerned colliery and when he demanded his wäges he was being sacked, is also not correct.Over this photo topy of training certificate my signature is there which identify . (Doermennt already marked Ext. W- 13. Over the document dExt. W-2 also my signature is there which 1identify. Over the doeurient marked Ext. W- 3 whether my signature is there or noti l-am not in a position tolas certain the same. The In demand of the concerned workmanthat he was retrenched from his services despite having worked in the concerned refliery, is not correct andjustified. Further the demand of in the concerned workman for reinstatement with full back automatically terminated this only shows that he got no appointment letter for which he is entitled for employment ,

BUER W2318 ExeM - 1' contains wh3to ExEM - 1 ' contains which has been mentioned

wages , is not justified )neubunda to onim . In view of the discussions made above . I com 7. to by the concerned workman . Ext.M - 2 is office order

regarding training facilities as PDPT (Mining ) in which it to

has been mentioned that training will automaticallyautomat be bris terminated after terminated after expiry of one year . Asyear . As per Ext. M- 4 the

the conciusion that the demand ofthe workman , Sh . Bhoia Singh regarding reinstatement in the employment as Overman in Basdeopar Colliery and full wages against the linwork done by him during 6-6-1992: to-17-5-1993 is not 5963 4092 [भाग खण्ड (ii) MA

भारत का राजपत्र अक्तूबर 2007 शिव

justified and hences the doncerned workman is hat entitled toany relioma un bas ราช วรว faibon

Thatë odt of novig nohamini не гі 2-300-9-21 This is my Award สกล ถ้วยราง usa amba

мой поівтінь TH . M. SINGH, Presiding Officerad att gnisub sonrada aid nibts now at ५०० - नई दिल्ली सिवानक, 2008 one bonoimemore

vino This case spoming up for hearing ond @ & @@@ 2sthison asıl diw Tribunal- cum-tabpur Count on 4-8-2009 passed theasads following: sonsoonni eid avor of smarow sit of navig This iba peferencemade under Section (d )(d) afrodius Industrial Disputes Act. The se forenerisqora si memimม ๆ

" Whether the action of the management of p FederalBank had with its headquarters atAlwaye Kerala in dismissing from service of Shri Sikiatning Varghese, Bankman ( PF N6949) ofofThumpoly branch without notice vide order dated 12-4-2006 justified? Ifnot , what reliefhe is entitled

bns PHOS JRuges to dicom od 10 19121200 ponsbustus का. आ. 27,19-औधोगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 1947 का 143 की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में हीस, सरकार फेडरलबैंक लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों केको - 8-5 बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में कोद्रीय सरकार औद्योषिजर्भ पली अधिकरण कीचीन के पंचार ( संदर्भ संख्या 257/2006) की प्रकाशित करती हैं, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 381203-912009 को प्राप्त हुआ था। 21 A. The faste of the case in briefare as follows : Shri

Sibi Varghese was a bankman of Federal Bank , Thumpolys

branch . He joined service on 8-9-1997. For having remained हसा एले 12012/126/2006-आई.आर.बी ssumes mit me ovaal अर्जय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी insyu ni iquoza satuled stitom sto viqgs of and swaelabsent unauthorisedly during 2004 and 2005 disciplinary New Delhi, the 3rd September , 2009 10 0 29283 action was initiated a domestic eriquine was conducted oils stojantys in sucul in S.O. 2719. In pursuance of Section 17 of theof Section of the way he was found guilty and was dismissed from servisse The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 14 of 1947 , the Centhemood disciplinary action isshallenged by the workman throughout Govemment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 257 2006) of the Central Government industrial Tribunal- cum Labour Court, Cochin as shown in the Annexure Industrial Dispute between the management of the Federal Bank Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Governinent on 39-200902 trailgas oviral banmaman ni nutystal bus saiton to stige al conuedo

2001-5-41 hash 10AJAY KUMAR BISK Office pomains wow sonpads bezmeriluca (4) sau

ell bustuna 308 26 z oysal 103 nolissítons sill BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT enibuit

The 2005 231, unions anoissa on na li to mo aysh 111 le boing a tot According the amon the enquiry wasrisada i conducted in violation of the principles of natural justleenb mids and faltness. No proper opportunity was given to the workmari to prove is hindtence. The findings of enquiry tindua Officer afe perverse The distrplinary dimberly didnot take toan aid into consideration the past meritorious serviceofthelimes sunsets zid not no : No.1-12012/ 126/2006 - IR ( i ) ]Jasti workıtali, Thẻ Workman thất nớt violated tinylave rulesitalniv He had submitted proper leave application with medidaten al certificate Whenever necessary ! He has to look after a family Paong a và anh VNNEXURE bornoης του ελευουπίnos consisting or wife two childert and aged and asting mini Joubnopeira father He has no alternate employmen He prays foppis satre -instatement ob bonner un buifon motion INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM

Present: Shri P. L, NORBERT, BA , LL.B., Presiding OfficerOf

(Friday the 14th August , 2009/23rd Sravana, 1931 ) no nirut

I. D. 257/2006 how stift of 2005-5-1 no me i

Unionvmaphut su of propor ai dub binnen ma bat od

ulduli zi bac barhadtumas zi 2000 - S- momit pangedu sitt

TheGeneral Secretaker word ding Jenings bobussung-od

Federal Bank Employees Union - Mat dalaiborumi

Central Office, Aluva 683101 sgane toidunt

By. Adv. Shi Anil Kumanovods aðr tot nanow so sad

Management att ta nadbaitęs sont gribuwiol moon

The Chairman , 2000-2-01 οι 2000-2-2 φοίτsn sdt lo loudest ni

The Federal BankLia il at noirsite sveal si ( 1)

Head Officespitinga legibomon ( 3 ) bus ( d) ol - Man Aluva- 88310

By. Adv . M/ s B.S. Krishnan Associates ban 2005

hoaletton nomkow ad Jult woda od 2000

bushothuats en botasit any sommerd 4. According to the management the workman remained absent on many days at different occasions in 2004 and 2005. He did not apply for leaveron time; Haused to submit applications and medical certificates after resuming duty . He remained absent sometimes execeeding 30 days continuously without intimation. His conduct is teh against the terms of settlement . In the past he had remained bag absent for a total number of 326 days arid was treated as of unauthorised absence . An enquiry was ordered against ab him in thethe past for unauthorised absence . He was found of guilty in the enquiry and the disciplinary authority had proposed punishment of dismissal from service . After hearing himalement view was taken and the pantsithent was modified to reduction or basic pay by two stages Pag second time for the same misconaner or absence'attorebel charge sheet was issued to him, a domestic enqury wagub conducted, he was found guilty and punishment of 20 dismissa was proposed! However after considering the submission the worker tentent view was taken byr reduction of basic pay by two stages dice again Barchettinos ytub osnioj berd and tent betrogetai 11.4000-0-41 OF 1000-8-2 5964

[PART I-SEC. 3(ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 /ASVINA 11 , 1931

has not made any improvement . A third time he remained absent for a period of 141 days . Every opportunity was given to the workman to prove his innocence . He was defended by a union representative . The past record of the workman was duly considered by the disciplinary authority . The appeal filed by him was rejected . The punishment is proportionate to the misconduct and requires no re- consideration.

5. In the light ofthe above contentions the following points arise for consideration :-

1. Are the findings sustainable?

2. Is the punishment proper?

alone. 6. The evidence consists of Ext.M1 Enquiry File

7. Point No.1 :- Ext.E- 1 and E-2 in Ext.M1 are the charge sheets issued to the workman alleging unauthorised absence on and off on many occasions during 2004-2005 . As per Ext . El charge sheet he was absent for a period of 131 days . Out of it on two occasions the absence exceeded 30 days were continuous (44 days and 45 days). As per Ext.E2 charge sheet the absence during 2005was 10 days ( from 3-6-2005 to 12-6-2005 ). According to the union the workman had submitted leave applications and medical certificates as well as fitness certificates whenever necessary and hence there was no violation of leave rules . But the management says that he used to apply for leave only after resuming duty. Whenever he remained absent continuously without intimation the management used to send notice and telegram asking him to report for duty immediately. But the workman neither replied nor resumed duty . Hence his absence was treated as unauthorised .

only on 15-9-2004 and submitted leave application along with medical certificate and fitness certificate only on 15-9-2004. Ext.ME- 2 is an intimation given to the Staff Admn . Dept. by the Branch Manager to the effect that there was no communication or intimation from the workman regarding his absence during the aforementioned period of 44 days . Ext.ME- 17 is copy of attendance register of the month of August 2004 and Ext.ME - 18 is attendance register of September 2004 . They show that the workman remained absent from 2-8-2004 onwards for 44 days . Ext.ME- 12 is an application for leave for the aforementioned period of44 days on sick ground. Ext.ME - 12(a) and (b) are medical certificate and fitness certificate . The leave application was submitted on 15-9-2004 along with medical certificate and fitness certificate. As per leave rules Ext . ME- 5 para 1.1 an employee who desires to obtain leave other than casual leave has to apply one month before except in urgent cases or unforeseen circumstances including illness . Para 1.5 says that no leave or extension of leave shall be deemed to have been granted unless an order to that effect is passed and communicated to the employee concerned. Since the workman had applied for leave on sick ground he may be justified in saying that he was not able to apply for leave before hand . But that does not mean that he need apply only after resuming duty. He has to submit leave application as soon as possible or intimate his absence. In spite of notice and telegram he remained silent without even intimating the reason for his absence . As per 6th Bipartite Settlement dated 14-2-1995 Clause 19.5 (p) unauthorised absence without intimation continuously for a period exceeding 30 days is a gross misconduct . His application for leave was not granted. Thus the finding of the Enquiry Officer that his absence is unauthorised , is in order .

8. As per Ext.El charge sheet the workman was absent during the following periods:

2-8-2004 to 14-9-2004 : 44days.

1-12-2004 to 14-12-2004 : 14days.

20-1-2005 to 27-1-2005 : 8days.

3-2-200510 19-3-2005 : 45days

30-4-2005 to 19-5-2005 20 days . :

9. The next period of absence is from 3-2-2005 to 19-3-2005 for 45 days . Ext.ME - 10 is a telegram sent to the workman on 11-2-2005 directing him to report for duty immediately. Ext.ME - 11 is a registered notice with postal receipt sent on 12-2-2005 to the workman informing him that he had not resumed duty in response to the telegram and his absence from 3-2-2005 is unauthorised and is liable to be proceeded against . Again he was asked to report for duty immediately. Ext . ME-4 is a report ofSenior Manager to the Chief Manager, Staff Admn . Dept. regarding the absence ofthe workman for the above period. Ext.ME- 16 is a letter of Branch Manager to the Staff Administration Department forwarding leave application of the workman in respect of the period 3-2-2005 to 19-3-2005 . Ext.ME- 16( a) is leave application for the period of45 days on sick ground. Ext.ME- 16 (b) and (c ) are medical certificate and fitness certificate . Ext.ME-23 is attendance register of February 2005 and Ext. ME- 24 is attendance register of March 2005. They show that the workman remained As per the above account the initial absence was for a period of 44 days . Ext.ME- 7 is a notice with A/D card issued to the workman on 30-8-2004 asking him to report forduty immediately. Ext . ME-6 is copy of the telegram dated 25-8-2004 asking the workman to report for duty immediately . Ext.ME- 1 is a report of the Branch Manager to the Cheif Manager , Staff Admn . Dept. regarding continuous absence ofthe workman during the period from 2-8-2004 to 14-9-2004.It is reported that he had joinedduty 5965 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

absent during the aforementioned period . The leave application was submitted only on 21-3-2005 . Since the absence was continuous and exceeding 30 days without intimation it is in violation of the leave rules .

resuming duty. The management was not convinced of the reason for the absence and his application was not allowed. It is a minor misconduct falling with Clause 19.7 (a) of Ist Bipartite Settlement.

14. The Enquiry Officer found that the absence was clearly unauthorised and against leave rules . The documents produced amply prove this fact . The workman was in the habit of availing leave now and then and sometimes exceeding 30 days . There is no reason to find that the conclusion drawn by the Enquiry Officer is in any wayincorrect.

10. The next period of absence is 14 days from 1-12-2004 to 14-12-2004 . Ext.ME - 13 is a letter ofBranch Manager to the Staff Admn . Dept. dated 15-12-2004 forwarding the leave application of the workman . Ext.ME- 14 is leave application dated 15-12-2004 . Ext . ME- 14 (a) and (b) are medical certificate and fitness certificate. During this period also he had not intimated the bank. His leave wasnot granted. From 20-1-2005 to 27-1-2005 he remained absent for 8 days . Ext . ME - 15 is a letter forwarding leave application of the workman by the Branch Manager to the Staff Admn . Dept. on 28-1-2005. Ext.ME- 15 (a) is leave application dated 28-1-2005 . Ext.ME- 15 (b) and (c ) are medical certificate and fitness certificate . Here also application was submitted after resuming duty and was not granted .

15. The contention in the claim statement that the workman was not given proper opportunity to prove his innocence is baselelss . As the proceedings sheet show the workman was given sufficient opportunity to participate in the enquiry and he was defended by union Vice President . The management witnesses were cross- examined. At the close of the evidence of management the workman was given opportunity to adduce defence evidence. But he did not avail the opportunity. For the reasons stated above, I hold that there is no infirmity in thefindings ofEnquiryOfficer.

11. From 30-4-2005 to 19-5-2005 he remained absent for 20 days without applying for leave . Only after resuming duty he applied for leave. Ext.ME-28 is a notice sent to the workman asking him to report for duty and informing him that he had not responded to the telegram. Ext.ME- 26 is a report of Sr. Manager of the Branch to the Staff Admn. Dept. regarding unauthorised absence of the workman during the above period . Ext . ME- 29 is a letter of Sr. Manager of the branch to the Staff Admn . Dept. forwarding the leave application ofthe worker . Ext.ME- 25 is attendance register of the period April 2005 and Ext.ME-32is attendance register of May, 2005. They reveal that the workman remained absent during the above said 20 days . Ext . ME- 30 is leave application dated 20-5-2005. Exı . ME-30 (a) and (b) are medical certificate and fitness certificate . The workman had failed to apply for leave or intimate the bank the reason for the absence .

12. As per the first charge sheet Ext. El thus the workman remained absent for a period of 131 days during 2004-2005 . Out of it on two occasions his absence exceeded 30 days continuously and is a gross misconduct as per Clause 19.5 (p) of 6th Bipartite Settlement. The other absence fall under Clause 19.7 (a) ofFirst Bipartite Settlement.

16. Point No. 2: The punishment imposed is dismissal from service . According to the workman he has a clean past record of service . It was not considered by the disciplinary authority while imposing the punishment . He has not violated any leave rules . He is sole bread winner of his family consisting of wife , two children and aged and ailing father. But the order of the disciplinary authority reveals that the workman was in the habit of remaining absent on an off even in the past . Twice domestic enquiry was conducted regarding unauthorised absence , he was found guilty in both disciplinary action , punishment of dismissal was proposed and after hearing the workman a lenient viewwas taken and the punishment of reduction of basic pay by 2 stages on both occasions , was imposed. This is the 3rd time that for the same misconduct disciplinary action is taken, domestic enquiry is conducted and punishment is imposed . Therefore he has no clean past record. The management branch may find it difficult to function smoothly without the help of a bankman . In spite of past two disciplinary action the workman did not make any improvement . The poor family circumstances describedby him did not impel him to attend duty and earn hisliving. Considering these circumstances it cannot be said that the punishment is in anyway shockingly disproportionate to the misconduct. Hence I don't think thatany leniency in the matter of punishment is called for .

In the result an award is passed finding that the action of the management in dismissing Shri Sibi Varghese from service is legal and justified and he is not entitled for any relief.

13. As per Ext . E2 the 2nd charge sheet the workman is said to have remained absent continuously for 10 days from 3-6-2005 to 12-6-2005 . Ext . ME -31 is a letter forwarding leave application of the worker to the Staff Admn . Dept. Ext. ME- 31 (a) is leave application dated 13-6-2005 . Ext . ME-31 (b ) and (c) are medical certificate and fitness certificate . Ext . ME-33 is attendance register of June 2005 which shows that the workman remained absent for 10 days continuously . He applied for leave only after 5966

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART I-SEC. 3 (1 )

BETWEEN nisu mord The award will come into force one month after its publication in the official gazetted bas

Sh . Surendar Singh , Presidentdothies aaw posade

Rashtriya Chaturth Shreni Rail Mazdoor Congress tamient (INTUC)

sal Of Dictated to the Personal Assistant , transcribed and typed by her , corrected and passed by me on this the 14th day of August, 2009.

68- Sector - 16 , Sikandara,

1,500 - 2000-01-1

Agra (U.P. )-7.

P. L. NORBERT, Presiding Officer

(Espousing matter of Shri Nathi Lal & Shri Ram Prasad ) wil Appendix

hew nutt barn

AND

Witness for the Union

Nil

1.The Divisional Railway Manager (P ) dois bonon dat

Central Railway,

Witnessfor the Management

Jhansi - 284001

Nil 33a Remp 6?? ?????????? ??

2. The Senior D.E.N. (Sr. D.C.M. )

Exhibit for theUnión

Central Railway,

Jhansi -284001

Nil

AWARDть ибада Exhibit for the Management siritub subbe of disconqui

19-8-2009

MIn Enquiry File.sve not th

नई दिल्ली, 3 सितम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 2720. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14. ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय , लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 108/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

1. By order No. L -41011 / 41 / 2001 - IR ( B- I ) dated: 30-5-2002 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labou NewDelhi in exercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d ), of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub section (2A ) of Section 10 of them Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute between Sh . Surendar Singh, President Rashtriya Chaturth Shreni Rail Mazdoor Congress ( INTUC ) 68- Sector 16, Sikandara , Agra ( Espousing matter of Shri Nathi Lal & Shri Ram Prasad ) and the Divisional Railway Manager ( P) , Central Railway, Jhansi & the Senior DEN (Sr. D.C.M. ) , Central Railway , for adjudication M [सएल-41011 /41 / 2001 - आईआर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

2. The reference under adjudication is IS:

New Delhi , the 3rd September , 2009

Kya Mandal Vanijaya Adhikshak (Samanya) , Madhya Railway, Jhansi dwara Shri Nathi Lalevam :203 Shri Ram Prasad ko dinank 1-4-1992 se sevarmainit sthaai nahi karke unhain nishkaasit karma nyayochit hai? Yadi nahi , to sambandhit karmkar kis anutosh ke hakdaar hain?

S.O. 2720.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central ... Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 108/2002 ). of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Central Railway and... their workmen , received by the Central Government on 3-9-2009

[No. L-41011 /41 /2001 - IR (B- 1 )]

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

Present: N. K. Purohit, PresidingOfficer

sardinetal . D. 108/2002

The case ofworkman's union in brief is that both the workmen, viz. Nathi Lal and Ram Prasad were under employment ofthe Railways w.e. f19-2-1977 and 3-861976 respectively as Hot Weather Water Man on seasonal work and have got temporary status , after working continuously for 120 days vide order dated 5-1-90. The workman were screened by through medical examination in the Railway Hospital for posting on permanent basis and were interviewed also but the management of Railways instead of employing them on permanent basis prevented them from work w.e.f. 1-4-92 ; moreover it not only retained 57 other workmen , junior to the workmen under consideration , but also made then permanent in Ref . No. L -41011 /41 /2001 - IR ( B - 1 ) dated: 30-5-2002 100002

20025967 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 193

service. The trade union has also submitted that name of the workmen finds its reference in the ETT Register and LiveRegisters , which are maintained by the management 12 /to provide employment on in railway service on priority بار basis , as and when the vacancies, arise. lemniatvi

retaining 57 workmen junior to the workmen under adjtidication and has submitted that out of said 57 workmen , 31 workmen were engaged on compassionate grounds and 26 workmen from the list prepared on the basis of past working days. Accordingly, the management of Central Railways has prayed that the claim of the workmen's union

대

be rejected without any Yelielas prayed by them! wild wit ng teat 20-21

it has 106. The workman has filed rejoinder, whereby it only reiterated its averments in the statement of claim and has introduced nothing new.tohow st

to ssory, the parties submitted documentary evidence in support of their respective cases and the union has examined the workmen concerned whereas opposite par examined Shri M. Quaon, Asstt DEM, NCR , Jhansi in support their respective cases . il 616.9 1.12 abai BA ( 5) 50000 41 has 4. It has been alleged by the workmen's union that the action ofthe management of Railway in preventing the concerned workmen to work is in contravention with the provisions of Indian Railway Establishment Manual and law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court wherebywhereby itit proprovides that it is obligatory to issue pre - notice, before removing such workmen who have got temporary status . It has further been alleged that the management has violated principle of "first come last go and that of provisions of section 25 G & H ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 by discontinuing the workmen and retaining other workmen junior to them, o Accordingly the workmen's union has prayed that the ipitWorkmen.concerned be reinstated with continuity & back

8.Heard learned representatives of both the sides and perused relevant material on record .

inwages and be regularized in railway services mot

5. 00-1-14marThe management of the Railway has disputed the claim ofm ofthe workman by filing its written statement, whereby it has submitted that the workmen have worked intermittently in the hot weather, ie, April/ June to July in the yearol 973-1976 & 1988 to 1991 only and thereafter, s consequent to installation of water coolers the practice of bus engaging hot weather watermen, was discontinued and

Diaccordingly they were never employed by the railways hafteru1991 in any capacity , therefore, there arise no question of making them permanent of preventing them

9. The learned representative on behalf of the workmen has contended that it has been admitted by the management that both the workmerl had worked since 1973 to1991 on Seasonal Work & the names find place in seniority list & they got temporary status . He has further contended that the workmen were prevented from the work in the next season wef4-1992 while 31 workmen, out of 5.7 who were absolutely new were given work after removing these two workmen . He has alleged that a workman of temporary status cannot be removed from service without notice . At the time of dis - engagement of the workmen 572 post of Group ' D' were vacant , The management has engaged 57 workmen on the basiss'of pick & choose policy in violation of principle of first came last go . Therefore, the workmen are entitled to get reinstatement insin service with full back wages wages & regularization . In support of contentions the has placed reliance on following case lawsbomow

1070001 円メップルレです !

from workalt has been submitted by the management that 21. beaften expiry of hot weather their engagement came to ano modelend automatically. Regarding medical examination and Prffren screening of the workmen by the railways , it has beerr submitted that this is done with an objective to check their suitability and whenever there is a need they may be called woand engaged, whereas regarding grant of temporary

1. 1992 SCC ( L& S) 611 Union of India Vs Basant Lal

& other side. imen an begagna vilaitini tow toaspistatus to the workmen it has been, submitted that the hot en sie weather workmen ate engaged for limited specified period

12/1989 LLI ( H ) SC2.72 Ram Kumar Ms Union of od srpfisummer, season and if their work exceeds 120 days they rather soi become entitled to MRCL or Temporary Status for that

mdiak 08-6-0006 ОЯМ то зишта год он sit 18-4-05 Ts.w- sovolgere tulumar an cupine

3.1996 SCC ( L & S ) 1273 Central Bank of Indi Vs. sil : mi particular season. Such seasonal worker , who earn i balsascw tpmporary status are paid, and provided other facilities at Serie span with other temporary status employees; but it does not

S.Satyam & others wil nie odt of FES cocheonfor any right upon them, to get any permanent temporary post in railways, As, regard maintenance of live

record of casual workers so that as and when need arise casual Workers , in future , they may be called with respect to their semdrity. The opposite parties have specifically be

deflied the violation of any of the provisions of Industrial

Disputes Act 1947 on principles of first come fast go ' byun

decontra, the learned fepresentative on behalf of the Railway Administration has urged that the workmen formowater, 19, passengers at Railway Station, The Mobile were engaged for Hot Weather Seasonal Work for providing Seasonal Casual Watermen engaged for Het Weather - cum- Summer season were to be disengaged, on 15th July or days the onset of Mansoon' which ever, was earlier, Further vide Railway Beard's letter dt Br2-1992 all the Mobile 5968

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 /ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

despite this he was not taken on work w.e.f. 1-4-92. He has futher alleged that no notice was given to him before disengagement.

Seasonal Casual Workman were disengaged in the year 1992. The para 2003 & 2006 of IREM Vol . II does not confer any right to the claimant for absorption in regular Group ' D' employment. He has further urged that casuals are not workers even if they have worked for more than 120 days . Further , similarly situated Mobile Seasonal Casual Water Man had also agitated I.D. before CGIT, Kanpur in ID 15/95 & 109/97 but the Tribunal held workmen not entitled for any relief similarly in I. D. No. 76/2001 , also the Tribunal has rejected such claim vide awarddt . 17-12-2004. The workmen are not entitled for any relief under I.D. Act . He has also referred following case law in support of his contentions .

1. 2004 ( 9 ) SRJ 364 Executive Engineer ZP Engg . Divn. & ANR Vs Digambra Rao Etc. (Regularization)

15. The management witness Sh . M. Oraon , Asstt. Divisional Commercial Manager has admitted that the workmen had worked from 1973 to 1991 every year as Seasonal Hot Weather Workmen but did not work continuously for 120 days in any season & as per Railway Board policy they were not engaged in the year 1992. But in cross - examination he has admitted that the names of Ram Prasad & Nathilal find place in seniority list at Sl . No. 233 & 658 respectively . He has also admitted that document no . 1/4dt . 3-1-99 belongs to Railway department and ultimately had to admit that temporary status was granted to them w.e.f. April 1989 .

2. 2002 (2) All India SLJ P. 316 The Range Forest Officer & Anr . Vs ST . Hadimani .

3..2003 (3 ) All India SLJX P.147 (SC ) Surendra Kumar Sharma Vs Vikas Adhikari and Anr .

16. Thus , the statement of the workmen as regard grant of temporary status also finds support from the evidence of the management witness & it is established from the evidence of management witness that the workmen had acquired temporary status vide order dt. 3-1-90 & as perthis order Sh. Ram Prasad & Sh . Nathilal were granted temporary status w.e.f. 29-4-89 & 3-4-89 respectively .

4. Morinda Co- op Suger Mills Vs Ram Kishan & others AISLJ. IV 1996 ( 1 ) page 170 Section 2 ( bb) (00).

11. I have given thoughtful consideration on the rival submissions of both the sides & perused the relevant record.

12. It is not disputed that the workmen had worked as Seasonal Hot Weather Workman . The Railway Administration has admitted in written statement that the workman Ram Prasad had worked as such in the hot weather from April to June/ July in the year 1973 , 1974 to 1976, 1988 to 1991 for the period hanging between 7 days in 1973 to 113 days in 1991 & the workman Nathilal had worked as such in the year 1983 for 119 days , in 1989 for 119 days & in 1990 for 97 days & in 1997 for 103 days .

17. As per Rule 2004 of REM Vol . II except where notice is necessary under any statutory obligation , no notice required for termination of services of casual labour but in case of casual labourers who has obtained temporary status after completion of prescribed period of continuous employment , the period of notice will be determined by the rules applicable to temporary railway servants . Rule 2005 prescribes the entitlement and privilege admissible to casual labourers who are treated as temporary i.e. given temporary status. The casual labour treated as temporary are entitled to the rights and benefits admissible to temporary railway servants as laid down in Chapter XV of the Manual . The Chapter XV is pertaining to terms and conditions applicable to the railway servant intemporary service. Rule 1502 envisaged that services of atemporary railway servant shall be liable to terminate on 14 days notice and lieu of the notice prescribed, it shall be permissible on the part of the railway administration to terminate the services a railway servant by paying him the pay for period of notice , and in case of railway servant to whom the provisions of the I.D. Act , 1947 , apply he shall beentitled to notice or wages in lieu thereof in accordance with the provisions of that Act.

13. The workman Sh . Ram Prasad has stated that he was initially engaged as Casual Labour on 3-8-76 . He had continuouslyworked since 16-4-88 at Koli Kal Vrindawan. He got status of MRCL on 29-3-89 & he was getting salary as regular employee w.e.f. 29-4-89 . He was called for interview vide messagedt. 31-3-92. His name is at Sl . No. 233 in the seniority list despite he was not taken on work w.e.f. 1-4-1992 . He has further alleged that no notice has been given to him before disengagement w.e.f. 14-1992.

18. In present matter although in the written statement ithas been disputed that the workmen had not worked continuously fro more than 120 days , but the management witness has admitted that vide order dt. 3-1-1990 ( 1/9) temporary status was granted to the workmen . The contention of the learned representative on behalf of the 14. Sh . Nathilal has also stated that he was engage on 19-2-77 & he had continuously worked upto 1988 & got MRCL status in the year 1989. He was initially appointed in 10 W ( Construction ) Mathura & getting regular pay since 1989 & hewas called on 31-3-92 for giving permanent status 5969 [ भाग. II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

envisage that no temporary post should be created to accommodate such casual labours who acquired temporary status for the conferment of benefits. Thus , such temporary status acquired casual labourer can not claim for regularization as a matter a right . Their regularization may be done in terms of railway rules according to their turn keeping in view the practice followed in such cases .

22. So far as the alleged violation of principle of 'FirstCome Last Go ' is concerned, it is not disputed that 57 persons have been employed vide order dt 16-4-92 ( 16/92) as Hot.Weather Watermen during the year 1992 out of them candidates from Sl . No. I to 31 mentioned in the said orderwere employed on the basis of compassionate ground and from sl . no . 31 to 57 have been employed on the basis ofdivisional seniority of casual watermen of commercial department. Admittedly, the name of the workmen Sh . Ram Prasad and Sh . Nathilal are at Sl. No. 233 and 658 respectively in the seniority list . But it is not establised from the material on record that those who have been employed vide order dt . 16-4-92 were junior to them . Thus , under has failedto prove that employment ofthe workman mentioned in the said order is in violation of Section 25 G & H of the I.D.Act .

railway administration that the temporary status was granted only for the year 1989 , is not tenable . There is no such provision in the IREM that temporary status granted wouldbe for only that particular year in which such status was granted. Even seasonal labourers as per Rule 2006 (2) (a) casual watermen for summer season shall be eligible for temporary status on completion of 120 days of continuous employment and once temporary status has beengranted vide order dt . 3-1-1990 ( 1/9 ) it may be assumed tht such status was granted after completion of the statutory prescribed period and once seasonal labour acquired temporary railway servant status by operation of law or by order of the railway administration the condition ofthe services would be governed as set out in Chapter XV of IREM , thus , prior to disengagement of the workmen compliance of the provsion as regard prior notice or wages in lieu of notice was essential . Admittedly , the said procedure has not been carried out in the present matter . In 2004 II1 LLJ P. 195 Hon'ble Gujrat High Court has observed that termination of the services of the employee who had acquired temporary status after completion of 120 days continuous service , the authority concerned had to comply with Rule 1502 of IREM Vol.I by issuing 14 days notice prior to termination in above case direction were given to reinstate the employee without back wages .

23. In view of the above discussions the workmen is entitled for resinstatement as temporary status employee . The workmen were disengaged in the year 1992 but they have raised the industrial dispute at very belated stage . Moreover , they have not stated that they did not remain in any gainful employment since 1992. Having regards to the entire facts and circumstances of the case , the interest of justice would be subserved by reinstating the workmen without back wages .

24.Accordingly, the reference under adjudication is answered as under;

19. The learned representative on behalf of the railway administration has referred the award passed in the matter ofMobile Hot Weather Watermen by CGIT, Kanpur and other Tribunals . The fact of those cases are different. Itwas not an admitted fact in the said awards that temporary status was granted to the workmen concerned but in present case it has been established that such status was granted to the workmen . In none of the case laws which have been cited by the learned representative , it was under consideration whether a seasonal labourer who had admitedly acquired temporary status under provision of IREMmay be disengaged without complying the provision under rule 1502 of the IREM Vol . I.

(i) Since the workmen had acquire temporary status, the action of the management disengaging the workmen in violation of provisions of IREM w.e.f. 1-4-1992 is unjustified, the workmen Sh . Ram Prasad & Sh . Nathilal are entitled to be reinstated as Seasonal Labourer having temporary status , in service without back wages on available vacancies.

20. In view of the discussions since , the workmen had admittedly acquired the temporary status in the year 1989 and notice or wages in lieu of notice has not been given prior to their disengagement, the action of the railway administration in disengaging the workmen w.e.f. 1-4-92 is notjustified.

(ii ) The railway administration is further directed to comply the direction to resinstate the workmen against available vacancies as expeditiously as possible and preferably within 3 months from the date of receipt of the order of the award .

25. Award as above .

Lucknow 19-8-2009

N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer 21. As regards relief for regularization of the services ofthe workmen is concerned in rule 2005 of the IREM it has been categorically mentioned that such casual labour who acquired temporary status , will not however , be brought on to the permanent or regular establishment or treated as regular employment in railway until and rules they are selected through regular selection for group ' D ' post in themanner laid down from time to time and subject to such order Railway Board may issue time to time. It further

3439 Gl/09-16 5970

[PART 11-SEC. 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ ASVINA 11 , 1931

APPEARANCE

नई दिल्ली, 3 सितम्बर , 2009

For the Petitioner

: M/s . P.V. Ballasubra- maniam & Others

For the Management : T.S. Gopalan & Co..

AWARD

का.आ. 2721.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार वैश्य बैंक लिमिटिड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 16/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

TheCentral Government, Ministry of Labour vide Notification No. L - 12012/ 185/2006, IR(B-I) dated 20-3-2007 referred the following Industiral Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication .

[सं. एल-12012/ 185/2006- आईआर ( बी 1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

The schedule mentioned in that order is:

New Delhi , the 3rd September , 2009

"Whether the demand of Sri M. Augustine for reinstatement into service with all benefits as his servicesdismissed w.e. f. 19-10-2002 after imposing penalty by the Management of Vysya Bank Ltd. is just and proper ? If not, to what relief is Sri M. Augustine entitiled to? "

S.O. 2721. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial.Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 16/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court Chennai as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Vysya Bank Ltd. and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 3-9-2009.

[No. L- 12012/ 185 /2006-IR( B -I ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE .

2. After the receipt of the industrial dispute, this Tribunal has numbered if as ID 16/2007 and issued notices to both sides . After that the petitioner appears in person and objected the representation of the Advocate by the other side. Subequently, he engaged an Advocate and file Claim Statement and the Respondent also filed Counter Statement.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT CHENNAI

3. The allegations in the Claim Statement are briefly asfollws:

Wednesday, the 26th August , 2009

Present : A. N. JANARDANAN, Presiding Officer

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE NO. 16/2007

(Inthe matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofsub-section ( 1 ) and sub-section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management ofVysya Bank Ltd. and their Workman)

BETWEEN

Sri M. Augustine

: Petitioner/ 1st Party

Vs.

1. The Senior Manager Vysya Bank Ltd. Chennai .

2. The Vice-President ( A& 1 )

EnquirtyOfficer

VysyaBank Ltd. Bangalore,

: Respondent/2nd Party

The petitioner entered into service of the RespondentBank in the year 1982 as a Peon and thereafter hewas promoted as Clerk in the year 1986. In his service he has been given many merit certificates for his meritorious sercice, While so , to his shock and suprise an order of suspension dated 3-8-2001 was issued and a Charge Memo was also issued to him . Three Charges were leveled against him and the petitioner denied the same . In the meantime , the Respondent Bank has also lodged a complaint with the Central Crime Branch Police in Crime No.496/2001 on the very same charges which were leveled against him in the Charge Memo . The petitoner appeared in the domestic enquiry on 20-4-2002 accompanying his Advocate but the Enquiry, Enqiry Officer had refusedto permit the petitioner's lawyer in the enquiry. The petitioner thenrepresented that since the criminal case on the very same charges is pending before the Court, the Departmental Enquiry should be kept in abeyance till the disposal of the said criminal case . But the enquiry Officer held that there is no bar to proceed with the enquiry and directed the petitioner to participate in the departmental Enqiry . Then the hearing was posted on 12-6-2002 and the petitioner requested the Enqiry Officer to give one month's time to filehis defence statement and it was granted by the Enqiry Officer. In the meantime, on 6-7-2002, the petitionermade 3. The Vice- President Dy. Head -H.R. & D.A . Vysya Bank Ltd. Bangalore.

5971 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आस्विन 11 , 1931

a specific request to keep all futher proceedings in abeyance pending disposal of the criminal case but by a telegraphic reply the Respondent refused to consider the petitioner's request and intimated him that the Departmental Enqiry will proceed. Futher on 13-7-2002, the Respondent Management has conducted the equiry exparte and forwardedthe copy of the Enquiry Report to the petitioner. But eventhe pertitioner's representation todrop all futher proceedings , the Disciplinary Authority issued a 2nd show casue notice and followed the usual procdure and imposed the punishment of dismissal against the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner approached the labour authorities and after faliure of conciliation the matter is referred to this Tribunal for adjucication . Since the departmental proceedings and the criminal case are based on identical and similar set of facts , the Respondent has keep in abeyance the departmental enquiry till the disposal ofthe criminal case . In this case, the Order of Suspension , the ChargeMemo , the enquiry were conducted by one and the same person viz . Thiru Jeyaparakash which the principals of natural justice. Even though, the petitioner has made several equests to the Enquiry Officer , the assistance of a lawyer which has been truned downby the Enquiry Officer and the same would amount to violation of principles of natural justice and biparrtite settlement. Hence, for all these reasons the petitioner prays that the order passed by the Respondent Authority is to be set aside and he has tobe reinstated in service wth all consequential benefits .

remittance pending advcie General Ledger Head Account to the SB A/ c of M/s. S Pascal Raj , Andre Joseph Marianna and Ramna Ravishanker . From these SB Accounts payments were made to the account of various parties including the petitioner's wife Mrs. Joanees Mary. As some of the entries revealed that the petitioner's wife was the beneficiary ofthe unauthorized transfer , it became evident that entreis must have made by the petitioner moreparticularly when the two concerned Officers whose password was used affirmed that had not authenticiated the entries and somebody must have used the password. On3-7-2001 , the 3rd Respondent made a complaint to the Additional commissioner ofPolice, Central Crime Branch and the complaint was taken as Crime No. 496/2001 . After that the petitioner was arrested by the Inspector of Police and in the presence of the said Inspector of Police, the petitioner made a detailed confession statement viz . the manner in which he made the fraudulent entries and how he used themoney which was misappropriated by him which statement was witnessed by S.V.S. Ramani and V. Srinivasan and the statement was given in the presence ofSri D.B. Desai who was then Special Officer (Vigilance Wing) of the Respondent Bank . When charge sheet was given to the petitioner on 31-12-2001 listing out the charges, the petitioner has not given any proper reply and he was prevaricating in his reply and did not answer the charges . eventhough he was asked to appear for enquiry and inspite ofseveral opportunities , the petitioner deliberately avoided the enquiry and thereby the Enquiry Officer was obliged to conduct the enquiry in his absence on 13-7-2002. In the enquiry Sri D. B. Desai , Special Officer (Vigilance) gave evidence speaking to the nature of transaction in which the petitioner indulged in malpractice and misapprepriated themaney. The petitioner did not come forward tomppear before the enquiry nor did he dispute any of the statement made by the sole witness examined in support of the charges . The Enquiry Officer gave his report holding that the charges against the petitioner were conclusively proved. when the report of the Enquiry Officer was forwarded to the petitioner , the report given a reply . Thereafter , a second show cause notice was issued proposing the punishment of dismissal and after the usual formalities , the Disciplinary Authority passed orders confirming the proposed punishment and dismissed the petitioner from service . The dismissal ofthe in the aforesaid circumstances is fully justifies and valid in law . Though , a number of opportunities were given to the petitioner, the petitionerwas not willing to participate in the enquiry and vindicate his stand, In any of these letters or explanation addressed to the Respondent , he has not given any explanation as to how the amount which was transferred to the SB Accooount of his wife or how the amount had gone into the hands of this wife the accounts of her firm. Therefore, he connot be heard to complain that he was not 4. The Respondent in his Counter Statement alleged thatthe Respondent is a Banking Company governed by the provisions ofBanking companies Regualtion Act. The petitioner was a Clerical staff working in the Mount Road branch during the year 2000-2001 . During July 2001 , the Officers of that branch were called for a meeting and they were impressed the imperative need to make complete reconciliation with regard to " Bills Realized Outstading Account" and "Remittance Cheques Qutstanding Main Brach Clearing" and " Any Bank Branch" . When the entries of the " Bills Realized Outstanding Account " and "Remittance Cheque Outstading Account" were verified) itwas noticed that there were no vouchers for two entries ofRs . 10 lakhs and Rs . 15 lakhs on 5-22000 and on 9-5-2000 respectively. On scrutiny it transpired that on 5-2-2000 Rs. 10 lakhs was transferred by debiting " Bills Realized Outstanding Account " crediting three Savings Bank Accounts viz . SB A/ c No. 75710 of S. Pascal Raj , SB A/c No. 89478. ofAndre Joseph Marianna and SB A/c No. 90816 of Ramna Ravishanker . Only a sum of Rs . 2,05,765 was creditied to the SB A/ c . No. 75710 of Pascal Raj on 5-2-2000 was utilized towards Cheque No. 699353 dated 11-2-2000 for Rs . 1 lakh to the credit ofM/s . Joanees Creators whose proprietrix was Mrs. Joanees Mary, the wife of the petitioner. It also came to light in the scrutiny that on 9-5-2000, 15 lakhs was transferred by debiting the 5972

[PART 11-SEC. 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ ASVINA 11 , 1931

givena fair deal in defending himself against the charges . accounts in the names of different persons including his wife. True there are no vouchers showing the existence of any tangible evidence in the material forms since the transactions are purported to have taken place through the system.

It cannot be contended that the Respondent Bank should keep the enquiry proceedings in abeyance completion of the criminal trial , in fact even as on date the cirminal trial , in fact even as on date the criminal trial is still under investigation . The Enquiry Officer apart from the documentary evidence has relied on the confession made by the petitioner to the police and the finding, the guilt on the basis of said confession cannot be interfered with . Hence, for all these reasons the Respondent prays that the cliam may be dismissed with costs .

5. Ponts for consideration are :

(i) Whether the demand of the petitioner for reinstatement into service after setting dismissal from service aside by the Respondent Bank is just and proper ?

(ii) To what relief the concerned employee is entitled ?

6. Evidence consists of the documentary evidence Ex . WI to Ex. W28 on the side of the petitioner and Ex. M I to Ex . M 39 on the side of the Responden. No toral evidence was adduced on either side .

Point No. 1

7. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the enquiry was commenced and concluded in undue haste within a period 3 months disregarding the repeated requsetssets of the petitioner praying for postponement and after setting him ex -parte. The releveant witnesses who allegedly left keeping the system open should have been examined . There are no vouchers in material forms but only the system entries to prove the allegation of falsification of accounts by wrong credits and debits . The enquiry report is an outcome of basis and perversity. The fairness of the departmental enquiry can be looked into at this stage , the learned counsel for the petitioner further argues. Further accordiing to him , it is not possible to arrive at the conclusion reached by the Enquiry Officer on the basis of the materials relied upon by the Enquiry Officer . He submits that the entries cannot show that they were made by the petitioner himself. He further pointed out that the petitioner was not given enough opportunity to defend the case . The finding of the Enquiry Officer is also assailed as perverse and the charges are challenged as not being proved, which stand denied by the Respondent's Counsel . The confession statement taken is also assailed as devoid ofthe singature of the petitioner . That D.B. Desai , Vigilane Officer of the Respondent was present , is not vouchsafed by his signature thereon the confessional statement or any other credential . The counsel for the petitioner argued in sequence that the confession statement is one purported to be recorded under Section - 161 Cr PC by Police and the same cannot be treated as a valid material to fasten liability uponthe petitioner . There is no other tangible material to show that the petitioner is the person responsible for the falsification of accounts as well the fraudulent debits and credits ofthe different misappropriated amounts to various

8. The learned counsel for the Respondent would argue that the question of fairness or propriety of the enquiry has already been considered and the same has been held to be just , fair and proper. He would repel the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the said question can be re - appreciated . The said contention isonly to be sustained . It is not disputed by the petitioner that he has given a confession statement before the Police . The present question is whether the finding of guilt entered bytheEnquiryOfficer is justifiable action on the confession statement . The Vigilance Officer , P. B. Dasai , has also before the Enquiry Officer that the petitioner has given a statement confessing the guilt levelled in the charges against him. It could be seen that all the documents marked as Ex . Ml to Ex . M 39 including the confession statement have been admitted into evidence on the expression of consent on behalf and by the petitioner . The Enquiry Officer relied on the confession statement as well as on material circumstances to conclude his finding that the petitioner is the person guilty of the fraudulent mispropriation of huge sums ofmoney and for falsification of accounts . In other words , it is not on the confession statement given by the petitioner alone that he has arrived at the conclusion that the charges are proved . The learned counsel for the Respondent invited this Court's attention to the decision ofthe Supreme Court in Kuldeep Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others ( 1996-10SCC- 659) wherein it was held that " if the apppellant's confession is relevant, the fact that it was made to the police or while in the coustody of the police may not be ofmuch consequence for the reason that strict rules of Evidence Act do not apply to departmental/ disciplinary enquiries . It the disciplinary authority comes to the conclusion that the statement was indeed voluntary and true . He may well act upon the said statement in the instant case the authorities say that they were staisfied about the truth of the appellant's confession " . Another decision was rendered by the Apex Court in Commissioner ofPolice , New Delhi and Narendra Singh (2006-3 -LLN- 104) wherein it is held that " Confession or admission of guilt made by a person accused of an offence before or while in the custody of a police officer is not admissible in a court of law according to Section -25 and 26 of the Evidence Act , 1872 and it is equally well settled that these rulesofevidence do not apply to departmental enquiries ." As could be seen the above rulings if is satisfied that there was a confession made , it was voluntary and the same is true and relevant the same can be acted upon even ifmade before Police . There is enough proof show that petitioner confessed . He himself has not denied having givensuch a confession . The confession is voluntary. As 5973 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3, 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

Ex. W9 12-6-2002 Proceedings of the Departmental Enquiry

Ex. W10 12-6-2002 Attendance certificate of the Enquiry

Ex. WII 06-7-2002 Representation of the Petitioner

Ex. W12 11-7-2002 Notice of the 2nd Respondent

Ex.W13 12-7-2002 Telegram of the 2nd Respondent

Ex. W14 24-7-2002 Representation of the Petitioner

Ex. W15 29-7-2002 Order of relaxation of conditional Bail

Ex. W16 30-7-2002 Report of Enquiry

Ex. W17 06-8-2002 Representation of the Petitioner

Ex. W.18 05-9-2002 Second Show Cause Notice of the 1st Respondent

Ex. W19 16-9-2002 Representation of the Petitioner couldbe gathered from the fact that it unfolds the relevant fraudulent transactions committed by someone and that someone later came to light to be the petitioner himself under which there have been falsification of various accounts and mis- credits and debits leading to ultimate misappropriation of huge amounts of money extending to Rs. 25.00 lakhs . The fact that major portions ofthe amounts were found credited into the account of the wife of the petitioner and his associates could be read as conclusive circumstance to hold that the petitioner alone is responsible for the entire episode relating to the fraudulent transaction which he contrivide using the misplaced found passwords ofhiscolleagues . It could well he found that the petitioner alone is the person responsible for the fraudulent traffic to the exclusion of anybody. There is no illegality or perversity inthe impugned finding ofthe Enquiry Officer and therefore the same is only to be upheld as just and proper and it is so found . Regarding the alteration of the punishment having regard to the nature or gravity of the offence committed hy the petitioner standing in fiduciary relationship with the Bank, no interference with the punishment imposed is called for.

Ex.W2016-9-2002 Change of Address of the Petitioner

Point No. 2

Ex. W21

To what relief the concerned employees is entitled ?

27-9-2002 Letter to 3rd Respondent for Subsistence Allowance 9. In the light of above finding, the petitioner is not entitled to any relief. No. order as to costs .

Ex. W22 28-10-2002 Letter to 3rd Respondent for Subsistence Allowance 10. The reference is answered accordingly.

Ex. W23 26-11-2002 Letter to 3rd Respondent for Suhsistence Allowance

Ex.W24

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed hy him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 26th August, 2009) .

18-12-2002 Grievances of the Petitioner to MD&CEO

A. N. JANARDANAN , Presiding Officer

Ex. W25

Witnesses Examined :-

31-01-2002 Savings Bank A/ c Statement of thepetitioner

None

For the 1 Party /Petitioner

Ex. W26 8-02-2003 Reply from the Vice -President- IR&W

None

For the II Party/Management :

Ex. W27

Documents marked on the side of the Petitioner

19-10-2002 Dismissal Order issued by the 1st Respondent.

Ex. No. Date Description

Ex.W28

Ex. WI

First Information Report (FIR)

31-7-2001

09-8-2004 Disrcetion of the Hon'ble High Court , Madras in WP 6711 of2003

Ex. W2 03-8-2001 Suspension Order of the Respondent

On the Management side:

Ex. W3 31-12-2001 Articles of Charges

Ex.No. Date Description

Ex. W4 04-02-2002 Representation of the Petitioner

Ex.M1 11-01-2002 Petitioner ' s letter to Vice Ex. W5 20-4-2002 Preceedings of Departmental Enquiry

President- Pers & Admn . and Disciplinary Authority of the Respondent

Ex. W6 1-5-2002 Representation of the Petitioner

Ex.M2

19/ Respondent's Memo No. 100/01 Ex. W7 7-5-2002 Reply of the 2nd Petitioner

Ex. W8 15-5-2002 Representation of the Petitioner

23-01-2002 ER/ 1940-2001-02 to the Petitioner 5974

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ASVINA 11 , 1931

Ex. M3 18/19-03-2002 Order ofDisciplinary Authority No. 11 /01 /ER/2241 Ex.M4 09-4-2002 Letter fromDisciplinary Authority to petitioner - Ref No. 100/01 / ER/40 with Ack . of Petitioner Ex. M5 20-04-2002 OralStatement of petitioner in Departmental Enquiry No. 8/ 02 against the petitioner

Ex. M6 01-05-2002 Petitioner's Telegram Disciplinary Authority received byBank on 04--5-2002 to Ex. M7 06-05-2002 OrderofDisciplinary Authority to petitioner-Ref. No. 11 /01 /ER 175 with acknowledgement Εχ .Μ8 13-05-2002 Enqiry Officer's comunication to Petitioner In ref. No. 100/01 / GDJ/ 202 enclosing list of document and list of witnesses referred to be examined in the enquirywith postal acknowledge- mentofpetitioner.

Ex. M9 13-07-2002 Proceedings sheet of Depart- mental Enquiry No. 8/02 Ex . M10 13-07-2002 Exainination in Chief of MW.1 Mr. D..B . Desai

Ex . M11 13-07-2002 Enquiry Officer's communication to Petitioner enclosing copy of proceedings dated 13-07-2002 with copy of deposition and documents marked and taken on record.

Ex . M12 05-02-2002 Copy of transaction of the bank at Mount Road Branch , Chennai Ex.M13 05-02-2002 Copy of page 23 of transaction supplementary of05-02-2000 Ex. M14 05-02-2000 Copy of Page 24 of transaction suppplementary of 05-02-2000 Ex. M15 05-02-2000 Copy of Page 25 of transaction supplementary of 05-02-2000 Ex, M16

Copy of Statement of A/cs of SB A/c No. 75710 and 4 withdrawals made on 12-02-2000 and another

[PART SEC. 3( ii )] on 14-02-2000 on 15-02-2000 and 22-02-2000

Ex.M17

Copy of Statement ofA/cs of SB A/c No. 89478 and 4 withdrawals made on08-02-2000 on 10-02-2000, on 11-02-2000 and on 23-02-2000

Ex.M18

Copy of Statement of A/ cs of SB A/c No. 90816 from 04-11-1999 to 28-02-2001 with transaction entry on 05-02-2000 and 3 withdrawals

Ex. M19 09-05-2000 Copy of Direct GL transaction on 09-05-2000

Ex. M20 09-05-2000 Copy of Page 32 of transaction supplementary of09-05-2000

Ex.M21

Copy of Page 159 of Cheques Issued Register

Ex. M22

Copy of Page 197 of Cheques Issued Register

Ex. M23

Copy of Page 33 of Cheques Issued Register

Ex.M24

Copy of Page 91 of Cheques Issued Register

Ex. M25

Copy of Page 25 of Cheques Issued Register

Ex. M26

Copy of SB A/ c Opening Form of S. Pascal Raj

Ex. M27

Copy of Specimen Signature Card of S. Pascal Raj

Ex.M28

Copy of Cheque No. 699360 favouring the K.V.B. Ltd. S. B. A/c . No. 9625

Ex. M29 12-05-2000 Copy of Cheque No. 699359 of the Bank of Mount Road Branch favouring Yourselfs DD- on Pondicherry

Ex.M30 11-02-2000 Copy of Cheques No. 699353 of the Bank of Mount Road Branch favouring the Karur Vysya Bank Ltd.

Ex.M31 12-06-2002 Letter from Petitioner to Enquiry Officer

Ex. M32 31-07-2002 Letter from Disciplinary Authority to Petitioner enclosing copy of report ofenquirydated30-07-2002on thechargesdated 31-12-2001. levelled against the petitioner Receivedby Petitioner on 30-8-2002 [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

5975

भारत का राजषत्र : अक्तूबर 3, 2009/अश्विन 11 , 1931

Ex. M33 Photocopy of the cover in which dismissal order was sent to the petitioner and returned undelivered by the postal authorities..

Ex .M34 08-11-2002 Circular issuedby Vice-

President and Dy. Head-HR of the bank to all Branches regarding in the Dismissal of petitioner

Ex. M35

Postal acknowledgement of the petitioner in reply to Respondent's letterdated 08-02-2003 under Ref. 100/01 /ER/ 1364

Ex.M36

Extract ofPage 48 ofBipartite Settlement - Clasue 19,12 in respect of engagement of lawyer Ex. M37

Extractof3rdBipartite settlement- pages 22 to 25

Ex. M38

Photocopy of two Mahazars dated 29-09-2001 and 20-02-2002 in Case No. 469/01 (Original has beenfiledby police before the Additional MetropolitanMagistrate Court, Chennai)

Ex. M39

True copy of Confession Statement of petitioner recorded by Inspector of Central Crime Branch on 02-08-2001 before 2witnesses (Original of this Confession Statement has been filed bythe police before the Additional ChiefMetropolitan Magistrate Court, Chennai ) नई दिल्ली , 3 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2722-. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , कानपुर के पंचाट( संदर्भ संख्या 49/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 3-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -12012/ 15 /2000- आई.आर. ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 3rd September , 2009 S.O. 2722-.In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.49/2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of State Bank of Indiaand their workmen , received by the Central Government on 3-9-2009.

1 [No. -L- 12012/ 15/2000- IR (B-1) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI RAM PARKASH , PRESDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR-COURT, SHRAM BHAWAN, ATI CAMPUS, KANPUR.

Industrial dispute Case No. 49 of 2000

Between:

Sri Yogendra Singh,

S/o Sri M.P. Singh , C/o H.M.S. 136-K, Sarvodaya Nagar, Kanpur And

1. The C.G.M S.B. of India Local Head Office Moti Mahal , MargHazrat Ganj , Lucknow

2. The Deputy General Manager , State Bank of India,

ZonalOffice, M.G. Marg, Kanpur.

AWARD

1. The Central Government, Ministry of Labour and Employment ,New Delhi , vide its notification No. L- 12012/ 15/2000-1R (B- 1 ) dated 24-05-2000, has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal :

Whether the action of the Deputy General Manager, State Bank of India, Kanpur , in terminating the services of Sri Yogendra Singh witheffect from 05-01-99 is legal and justified ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled for?

2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the applicant (claimant ) was an Ex - serviceman , who was unemployed . Opposite party bank and some vacancies of guard, therefore they requisitioned from the District Soldier WelfareOfficer (hereinafter for the sake of brevity shall be referred to as DS WO ) to intimate a few names of suitable ex-servicemen for the post . The DSWO sponsored the name of the applicant to the opposite Party . After taking application for same post of guard along with all the certificates including educational qualification and the record of ex - servicemen , the opposite party judged the suitability of the applicant and he was selected and enganged by the opposite party on regular post just after test and interview and all other formalities the opposite 5976

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 / ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ] .

5. The opposite party bank has contested the claim of the applicant and had filed the written statement vide paper no. 10/1 to 10/11 .

partywas pleased to give employment in the bank as guard inthe month of September 1988. The opposite party clearly told the applicant that he is given employment on regular basis as guard but later on due to high handedness and exploitation treated the applicant as Badli Guard which is unfair labour practice of the opposite party . The opposite party bank had not issued any appointment letter to the applicant due to their explotive attitude. However, the bank had issued following experience certificate to the applicant

(1) Kalpi Road Kanpur Branch from Sept.1988 to Feb. 1989

(ii) Chamanganj , Kanpur Branch from Feb. 1989 to June 1989

(iii) Deputy Ka Parao Branch from Mar. , 1991 to Mar.1996

(iv) G. T. Road Branch

from Apr. 1997 to Jan. 1999

6. In the written statement they have raised preliminary objection , inter- alia- on the ground that the reference is bad in the eye of law; that there exists on industrial dispute nor is apprehended; that the applicant haswrongly impleaded the Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, L.H. O. and Deputy General Manager, Kanpur as defendants . None of them is directly and indirectly is concerned with, the industrial dispute raised by the applicant; that the claim of the applicant appears to be for being given status of a protected employee because ofthealleged continuation of service for one year by virtue ofwork for more than 240 days in 12 calendar months preceding the day with reference to which calculation has to be made as per Section 25-(B ) ( a) read with Section 25 Fof Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The applicant was never in continuous service of the bank for 240 days or more consequently he is not entitled to prefer the claim .As per provisions of Section 2(oo ) (bb ) of the Act the applicant is not entitled to claim any protection under Section 25 -B of25 - F of the Act . There is no relationship of Master and servant or employer and employee between the applicant and the management .

7. The applicant was a badly guard on leave vacancy purely on temporary and ad - hoc requirement and irregular intervals . The applicant had suppressed material fact that he himself had applied to be engaged as Badli Guard . He was fully aware of the nature of his engagement, selection ofthe applicant was never made on regular basis . Neither any test nor interview was ever conducted in respect of the employment of the applicant. Requisition made by the bank from DSWO was also for Badly Guard on temporary basis on 5-5-1997. The applicant had himself given and requested to be appointed as Badli Guard and the application dated 5-5-1996 is annexed as D/ 1 to the written statement .

3. The opposite party is not giving work to the applicant since 05-01-99 , although the applicant had been requesting regularly, although the opposite party has not issued any termination order , but they verbally told the applicant that they have terminated the service of the applicant and they will therefore not give work/ employment to the applicant . The opposite party now saving that the applicant was a Badli Guard . The opposite party is guilty of refusing employment to the applicant as so many vacancies and work were created . But instead of giving employment to the applicant new hands were given employment which is unjust unfair and against the provisions of Section 25 -H of the Inustrial Disputes Act, 1947. The names of the new persons who were given work after refusal ofwork to the applicant are Sri C. B. Singh , at Kalpi Road Branch , Kanpur, Sri R.C. Pal at Chamanganj Branch at Kanpur , Sri Ramesh Shukla at Deputy Ka Parao Branch the bank. In this continuation the applicant has also filed the list of persons junior and new appointments vide paper no . 14/5 through Rejoinder . It is averred that it shows that there were requirements of guards but the applicant has been refused work. The applicant wrote a letter on 14-02-1999 under registered cover to the employer togive work to the applican but no reply received . Therefor the applicant been refused work for no reason but due to high handedness and exploitation .

8. The applicant had worked certain period during September 1988to Feb. 1999 with Kalpi Road Branch Kanpur . Thereafter for a period of 31 days he had worked during Feb. 1989 to June 1989 at the Chamanganj Branch and thereafter for 15 days he and worked at Deputy Ka Parao Branch , Kanpur , as per his own admission made in the application dated 5-5-97 filed with GT Raod Kanpur Branch. Thereafter with effect from 6-5-1997, he had worked for certain intervals upto January 1991 , the details ofwhich are given hereunder- .

141

Year 1997 Total period of working days

Year- 1997 DO 122 4. Therefore, he had made a prayer that the applicant be declared regular employee of the bank and be paid scale wages applicable to the guard . He has also prayed that the order be issued to the opposite party to give work and to pay wages and other benefits to the applicant for the period he remained unemployed.

Year- 1999 DO [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

5977

Ö अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

9. Sri Ram Lotan Singh was a permanent guard who had proceeded on medical leave on different intervals and in his absence the applicant was asked to work as Badli Guard. His services were utilized as and when proceeded on leave at G.T. Road Branch , Kanpur, or out of station from his duties . Thereafter on retirement of Ram Lotan another permanent employee namely Rajendra Yadav Joined ontransfer as such service ofBadli Guard were not required. It is denied that the applicant was reporting at the branch since 5-1-1999 . It is specifically denied that any new hands have been employed by the answering defendant. It is submitted that during the engagement of the applicant as Badli Guard the official of the bank found him facing hard hearing problems and the applicant was asked to submit the discharge certificate as well as doctors certificate in thisregard which he has failed. The security is a sensitive and important matter and if the person is hard hearing he could not discharge his duties effectively. Consequently he has not been engaged as Badli Guard by the opposite party.

10. In documentary evidence the claimant adduced evidence vide list no . 18/1 . He has filed 25 documents- (1) Discharge certificate of the applicant.

(ii) Certificate of the Bank dated 14-8-91

( iii) Certificate of the bank dated 8-5-91 .

(iv) Notice of the bank published in the paper .

(v) Notice of the bank published in the New paper (vi ) Receipt of post office for Regd. A.D letter .

(vii) Acknowledgement.

(viii) Application of the applicant.

(ix) Bankers cheque dated 4-6-97 for Rs . 1480 .

(x) Bankers cheque dated 2-7-97 for Rs . 3300 .

(xi) Bankers cheque dated 11-09-97 for Rs . 1295.

(xii) Bankers cheque dated 9-10-97 for Rs . 3953/57.

(xiii) Bankers cheque dated 23-12-97 for Rs . 657 .

(xiv) Letter ofthe applicant dated 25-07-98

(xv) Letter ofthe applicant . 3-9-98 .

(xvi ) Letter dated 13-10-98 of the applicant .

(xvii) Letter dated 24-11-98 of the applicant .

(xviii) Letter of the applicant dated 1-1-99.

(xix) Letter of the applicant dated 25-1-99.

(xx) Letter of the applicant dated 14-2-99.

3439 G1/09-17

(xxi) Postal receipt of the letter.

(xxii) Application of the applicant dated 24-3-99 filed before the ALC (c) Kanpur.

(xxiii) Bank reply of the above .

(xxiv) Certificate dated 17-12-92 issued by employer .

11. The opposite party bank has filed two documents vide list paper no . 33/1 the documents are 32/1 as misc . letter dated 6-3-2000 , and the copy of conciliation which paper no. 31/1 .

12. I have heard both the parties at length and perused the records deeply .

13. The reference sent by the Government of India is likethis-

Whether the action of the Deputy General Manager, State Bank of India, Kanpur , in terminating the services of Sri Yogendra Singh with effect from 5-1-1999 is legal and justified ? If not to what relief the workrnan is entitled for?

14. In this case the applicant has alleged that he was appointed by the opposite party bank as guard against a clear existing , permanent vacancy after following the set. recruitment procedure . He was interviewed and his name was sent by DSWO . He worked at Kalpi Road Kanpur Branch from Sept. 1988 to Feb 1989 , at Chamanganj Branch from Feb. 1989 to June 1989 at Deputy Ka Parao Branch, from March 1991 to March 1996 and at G. T Road Branch , from April 1997 to Jan. 1999. He also alleged that due to high handedness and exploitive attitude he was not given any appointment letter by the opposite party bank and due to the high handedness he was treated as Badli Gaurd , therefore, he claims that he be employed on a regular post and he had been refused todo the work after 5-1-99 . He sought that he be declared regular employee of the bank and he be paid scale wages applicable to guards .

15. Against the claim of the claimant , opposite party stated that the applicant was not employed against a permanent , clear and existing vacancy . The applicant was engaged as Badli Guard purely on temporary leave vacancy at irregular intervals . He was fully aware of the nature of his engagement . The opposite party bank is a statutory body and while giving appointment to any person they have to follow the prescribed selection procedure . Selection ofthe applicant was never made on regular basis . Neither any test nor interview was ever conducted in respect of his employment . Requisition made by the bank from DSWO was also for Badly Guard . The applicant had himself given and requested to the bank to be appointed as 5978

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 / ASVINA 11 , 1931

badly guard and the application dated 5-5-97 is annexed as D- 1 .

Manager, State Bank of India , Kanpur . There was no advertisement by the Deputy General Manager inviting application for filling temporary or regular vacancy of guard . The applicant has failed to prove that due to exploitive nature or high handedness of opposite party he was not provided any appointment letter .

16. Now it is set principle of evidence that one who alleges a fact the burden lies on his shoulder to prove the facts . Therefore, in this case the burden shall lie on the claimant himself to prove his case . He has examined himself as W.W.1 . I have gone through his statement . In the examination in chief he himself admitted that he was appointed as badly guard and when ever any guard was sent on leave he was given the job in his place which is of badli guard. In the cross examination he admitted that the payments of the permanent guard is made through register , whereas his salary was paid by cheque. He also admitted that he was not entitled to medical and other leave as given to other permanent employees . He also admitted that he was not given any appointment letter at either branch i.e. Kalpi Road, Chamanganj , Deputy Ka Parao or G.T. Road Branch , Kanpur.

19. The applicant has mainly stressed that the opposite party has stated in their written statement that "during the engagement of the applicant as Badli guard the officials of the bank found him having hard hearing problem and the applicant was asked to submit discharge certificate and doctor's certificate but he was failed . The security is a sensitive and important matter if a person is hard hearing he cannot discharge his duties effectively, consequently he was not engaged as Badli Guard . " Therefore , applicant claims that it amount to termination . The opposite party bank's authorized representative although does not put any stress on this para but even then I have gone through its verdict and meaning on its face and I do not find that the claimant claim any benefit from this stanza because first of all the claimant has to prove that he was employed on regular basis on a clear and existing vacancy . But he has not been able to establish thisfact.

20. The applicant has also alleged that instead of giving employment to the applicant new hands were given employment which is unjust and unfair and against the provisions of section 25 - H of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. He has stated the names of persons who were given work after refusal of work to the applicant are Sri C. B. Singh at Kalpi Road Branch , Sri R. C. Pal, Chamanganj Branch Kanpur and Sri Ramesh Shukla at Deputy Ka Parao Branch of the opposite party Bank.

17. The claimant had also filed documentary evidence vide list paper no . 18/1 . The opposite party bank has drawn my attention towards paper no.18 / 16 to 18/22 , in which Yogendra Kumar Singh the applicant himself has shown hisstatus as badli guard. In paper no . 18/23 dated 14-2-99 the applicant had stated that he was not being given work since 5-1-99 . Similar facts have been alleged in letter paper no.18/25 , dated 24-3-99 . The opposite party contended that in none of these letters he has claimed that his services have been terminated . It is also contended by the opposite party that according to the applicant he had been on temporary engagement since Sept. , 88 to Jan. , 1999, but he never objected or wrote any letter that he has not been given appointment letter due to high handedness or exploitive nature of bank . The opposite party bank has specifically stated that Sri Ram Lotan Singh was a permanent guard and whenever he proceeded on medical leave on different intervals and in his absence the applicant was asked to work as Badli Guard .

21. The opposite party bank had produced Shashi Prabha as M. W. 1 in her oral evidence she stated that Ram Lotan Singh was a permanent guard in the barnk and he superannuated and thereafter one Sri Rajendra Yadav on transfer joined in place of Sri Ram Lotan . She specifically stated that no new hands recruitment was made after the termination of the service of the claimant . This is the case of the opposite party bank in their pleadings also . In this regard I have perused the evidence of the applicant (W.W.I ) he has not stated in his examination in chief specifically that he has been retrenched and in his place new appointments have been made . He simply stated that Ram Lotan who was employed as permanent guard retired in the year 1997. In this way he himself has admitted specifically that Ram Lotan was permanent guard and retired in the year 1997. In these circumstances how the opposite party can give appointment against single post to two persons . After the retirement of Sri Ram Lotan the 18. Therefore, I considered both evidence adduced by the parties and narrated arguments before me . Now I have to see as to whether there is any relationship of master and servant or employer and employee in between the bank and the applicant . If there had been relationship of master and servant only then question of termination may arise . According to the evidence the applicant failed to establish that he was appointed against clear existing permanent vacancy on regular basis . He was not getting salary when he absented on medical ground or otherwise. He according to his own application and certificate filed by him shows that he was engaged at different branches at different intervals. It is also the contention of the opposite party bank that he was never engaged by Deputy General 5979 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

postwas filled by the higher authorities on transfer basis . I do not find that there is any unfair practice adopted by the bank . Therefore, the applicant is also not entitled to any benefit of section 25 - F of the Act . To claim the benefit of this section 25 -F of the Act and to claim termination amounting to retrenchment, first there should exist master and servant relationship between the employer and the workman . As per rule there cannot be legal relationship of master and servant as held in Koodamji Service Cooperative Bank Limited versus MM Lissy 1993 (67) , FLR 1039, Kerala.

22. The applicant has based his case on one ruting [(2008 ) (85 ) FLR 197 ] Supreme Court, Civil Appeal No. 1965 of 2000 between V. P. Ahuja and State of Punjab and anothers .

days continuously therefore he cannot take the benefit under this provision also . The applicant admitted in his cross - examination that in the year 1999 , he did not work continuously for 240 days in the preceding 12 calendar month at G. T. Road Branch of the bank at Kanpur . The authorized representative for the applicant has not raised any arguments in this respect before me . The opposite party bank has stated that in the year 1997 total period of working days of the applicant comes to 141 and in the year 1998 period ofhis working days is 122 and in year 1999 he worked for 4 days only. Therefore , he did not work for 240 days in the 12 calendar months . The applicant has also filed certificatewhich is paper no . 18/3 and 18/4 wherein he has been shown to have worked from September , 88 to Feb. , 89 for 95 days and Feb. , 89 to June , 89 for 30 days . It is also the contention of the opposite party that the applicant has never alleged in his letter dated 5-1-99 that hisservices have been terminated but he alleged that he is not being given work . It is also the contention of the opposite party bank that no industrial dispute exists in between the parties , therefore , the DGM SBI , Kanpurhas been made unnecessary party.

24. As I have already said that there is no advertisement or requisition on behalf of DGM , SBI Kanpur , therefore , the DGM , SBI Kanpur does not appear to be a proper party. I am , therefore , of the view that the applicant has fully failed to establish his case , therefore, the reference is answered in negative against the applicant and in favour ofthe management of State Bank of India . It isfurther held that the applicant will not be entitled ferany relief as claimed by him pursuant to the present nesienoтые.

25.Reference is answered accordingly.

RAM PARKASH , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 7 सितम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 2723-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण लखलऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 102/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-40012/52/2004- आई.आर. ( डी. यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 7th September, 2009

S.O. 2723- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.102/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour 23. In this ruling of the Hon'ble Apex Court , the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that a probationer is like a temporary servant is also entitled to certain protection and his service could not be terminated in a punitive manner without applying with the principle of natural justice. I respectfully agree with the principle laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court . But in the present case facts are not similar . Appointment of a probationer is against an existing vacancy and that too he was appointed by following the selection procedure . Opposite party bank has placed its reliance on a number of cases are civil appeal no . 7 of 2006 Regional Manager State Bank of India versus R. K. Tiwari . 206 Lab IC 4046 SC (A), 2007 Lab IC page 987 SC . Civil Misc Writ Petition No. 19894 of2007 Deputy General Manager , State Baknk of India, Varanasi versus Presiding Officer, CGIT, Kanpur. In 209 Lab IC 866 SC in between State of Himanchal Pradesh and others versus Ravinder Singh and the authorize representative for the bank has also given list of other rulings in his written arguments . I have gone through the principle of law laid down by the Hon'ble High Court and the Apex Court . I respectfully agree with the principles . In the aforesaid Civil Appeal no . 7 of 2006, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held -what is unfair labour practice [ it is defined in clause ( ra) of section 2 of the Act as meaning any of the practice specified in the Vth Schedule] . It is held thatto employ workman as badly casual or temporary and continue them as such for years with the object of depriving them of the status and privileges of permanent workman. Butthere is no such evidence here in this case that the applicant was being employed with the object of depriving him of the status of a permanent workman . Therefore, the claimant cannot claim the benefit of retrenchment also . Word ' retrenchment ' has been defined in section 2 ( oo) of the Act . 1 have also discussed that the status of the applicant is not of permanent nature . It is also said by the opposite partythat the applicant had not worked for 240 5980

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3, 2009/ASVINA 11 , 1931

Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 7-9-2009.

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"

[No. L-40012/52/2004- IR (DU) ]

SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW Present : N. K. Purohit , Presiding Officer

I. D. No. 102/2004

Ref. No. L- 40012/ 52/ 2004- IR (DU) dated : 5-10-2004 BETWEEN

Sh . Bal Chander Sahani , S/o Late Sh . Kharphatu Sahani , Vill . Nakta, PostMadria , Tehsil Bashgaun , Gorakhpur

AND

1.The Chief General Manager , Telecommunication , East , Lucknow/ ThePrincipal General Manager , PeeKay Bhawan , Lucknow.

2. The Telecom District Manager, Telecom Deptt . BSNL , Bahraich - 271865 .

AWARD

28-8-2009

1. By order No. L -40012/ 52/ 2004- IR ( DU ) dated 5-10-2004 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour , New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section ( 2A ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) referred this industrial dispute between Sh . Bal Chander Sahani , S/ o Late Sh . Kharphatu Sahani , Vill . Nakta , Post Madria Tehsil Bashgaun , Distt . Gorakhpur and the Chief General Manager , Telecommunication , East , Lucknow/ The Principal General Manager , Pee Kay Bhawan , Lucknow, the Telecom District Manager , Telecom Deptt . BSNL , Bahraich - 271865 for adjudication.

2. The reference under adjudication is:

"Whether the action of the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. , Bahraich in terminating the services of Shri Bal Chandra Sahani S /o Late Shri Kharpatu Sahani , daily labour w.e.f. 31-7-2001 is legal 3. The case of the workman , Bal Chandra Sahani , in brief is that the workman was engaged by the management of BSNL, in August , 1998 as a daily wages casual labourer (Class IV post) in serious exigency of departmental work and since then he was working on said post and has worked for more than 240 days in the preceding years . The workman has alleged that the management of the BSNL has orally terminated his services w.e.f. 31-7-2001 , without any valid reason in absolutely illegal , arbitrary, malafide and discriminatory manner without affording any opportunity of hearing to the workman . The workman has further stated that in absence of regular appointments , the telecom department has been engaging daily wages casual labourers fromtime to time to meet the exigency of the work. It is alleged by the workman that he has not been given temporary status even after being recommended for the same, whereas the Department has granted temporary status and consequential benefits to similarly situated daily rated casual labourers w.r.t. Memo No. 117 /Ch 11 / TDM /BRH / Casual Labour / II dated 18-7-2000 of Department of Telecommunications , Office of the Telecom District Manager , Bahraich . The workman has also alleged that the management of BSNL has violated various provisions ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 i.e. Section 25 N for non-conduction of any inquiry against him or service of any charge- sheet , as well as for non - payment of any notice pay or retrenchment compensation , Section 25 G for retaining and continuing juniors in service and section 25H for engaging new persons without affording any opportunity to the workman for employment. Thus , the workman has prayed that the management of BSNL be directed to consider the case of the workman , to take him back in the service with back wages , to provide him temporary status with consequential benefits and to provide him bonus.

4. The management of the BSNL, in its written statement , has disputed the claim of the workman and has submitted that it never engaged the workman in any capacity in the August , 1988 or subsequently, hence there arise no question of having completed 240 days of service or alleged oral termination of the services of the workman or of violation of any of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 at all . Regarding engagement of the workman on daily wages , the management has mentioned that there was a complete ban on engagement of fresh Casual Labourers / Daily Wagers in the Department w.e.f. 12-6-1988 . The management of BSNL has submitted that earlier the Casual Labours were engaged on muster roll , but consequent to ban on engagement of Casual Labours /Daily Wagers w.e.f. June , 5981 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

1988 no fresh labour has been engaged on muster roll and also, the labours , who were earlier working on muster roll and were covered under grant of temporary status and regularization scheme, have been granted temporary status . The case ofthe workman does not fall within that category because he was never engaged by the management in any capacity altogether . Thus , the management has prayed that the claim of the workman be rejected being incorrect and misconceived since he was never engaged or appointed in the management of BSNL in any capacity .

5. The workman has filed rejoinder whereby it has only reiterated his averments in the statement of claim and has not introduced any new fact .

party- invoking jurisdiction of the court must fail . In the present case burden was on the workman to set out the grounds to challenge the validity of the termination order and to prove the alleged termination was illegal but the workman did not appear for evidence nor produced any other documentary evidence with the result that there is no material in rebuttal of the management evidence . It was the case of the workman that he had worked for more than 240 days in the year concerned . This claim has been denied by the management, therefore , it was for the workman to lead evidence to show that he had in fact worked up to 240 days in the year preceding his alleged termination . In (2002) 3 SCC 25 Range Forest Officer vs. S.T. Hadimani the Hon'ble Apex Court has observed as under:

6. The workman has filed photo copies of certain documents , less any appointment order , with his statement of claim , in support of his case whereas the management has not filed any documents with written statement , although it has disputed the authenticity of the documents filed by the workman .

" It was the case of the claimant that he had so worked but this claim was denied by the appellant. It was then for the claimant to lead evidence to show that he had in fact worked for 240 days in the year preceding his termination . Filing of an affidavit is only his own statement in his favour and that can not be regarded as sufficient evidence for any court or tribunal to come to the conclusion that a workman had , in fact worked for 240 days or order or record of appointment or engagement for that period was produced by the workman. On this ground alone , the award is liable to be set aside . " 7. The workman has not examined himself in supportport ofhis claim . It reveals from the proceedings of the case that despite several opportunities given to the workman he did not appear for evidence therefore , presumption was drawn on 28-10-2000 that he does not want to produce evidence in support of his claim and the case was fixed for evidence of the opposite party. On 2-1-2007 affidavit of Sh . Ram Charan , Divisional Engineer (HQ) Telecom District Manager , Bahraich was filed but he has not been cross - examined by the workman side . It also reveals that subsequently an application C-20 was filed by the representative on behalf of the workman to recall the ex- party orderdt. 28-10-2006 but on subsequent dates none appeared on behalf of the workman and ultimately the application was rejected on 17-6-2009 and case was fixed for argument but on the date of argument neither workman or his representative nor the representative on behalfofthe management appeard , therefore , the case was reserved for award .

10. In the present case , the workman has even not examined himself on oath in support of his claim that he had worked for 240 days during the period as stated in his statement of claim . He has not produced any original documents in support of his claim moreover , the genuineness of photocopies of the documents submitted by the workman has been questioned by the opposite party . Merely pleadings are no substitute for proof. Initial burden of establishing the fact of continuance work for 240 days in preceding 12 months from the date of his alleged termination was on the workman but he has failed to discharge above burden , therefore, in view of the aforementioned legal position there is no material for recording findings that workman had worked more than 240 days in the preceding year and the alleged unjust order of termination was ever passed by the management .

11. Thus , the workman is not entitled for any relief as claimed by him. The reference under adjudication is answered accordingly.

12. Award as above .

8. The management witness Sh . Ram Charan has stated in his affidavit that workman was neither appointed by the opposite party any class IV post nor he was engaged as daily wager . There was complete ban on the engagement of fresh casual labourers in the department w.e.f. 12-6-1988 . He has further stated that documents annexed with the claim statement by the workman are not genuine document the SDE , Mithinpurwa in order to give some undue bebefits to his kith and kin , has prepared some bogus documents . He has further submitted that SDE was not competent to engage any daily wager/ casual labourer without approval of the competent authority.

Lucknow 28-8-2009

N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer 9. It is well settled that if a party challenges the legality of order the burden lies upon him to prove illegality of the order and if no evidence is produced the 5982

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART 11 -SEC. 3( ii ) ]

2.The reference under adjudication is:

नई दिल्ली , 7 सितम्बर , 2009

"Whether the action of the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Bahraich in terminating the services of Sh . Diwakar S/ o Sh . Sudarshan , casual Mazdoor 31-7-2001 is legal and justified? If not to whatrelief the workman is entitled ?"

का.आ. 2724,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 90/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल-40012/37/2004- आई. आर. ( डी.यू. ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 7th September , 2009

2 S.O. 2724. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 90/2004 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Lucknow as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 7-9-2009.

[No. L-40012/37/2004- IR (DU ) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

Present : N.K.Purohit, Presiding Officer

1.D. No. 90/2004

Ref. No. L-40012/37/2004- IR ( DU ) dated : 16-8-2004

BETWEEN

Sh . Diwakar S / o Sh . Sudarshan

Sarswat Nagar, Bahraich (U.P. ) And

3. The case of the workman , Sh . Diwakar , in brief is that the workman was engaged by the management of BSNL , in August , 1998 as a daily wages casual labourer (Class IV post ) in serious exigency of departmental work and since then he was working on the said post and has worked for more then 240 days in the preceding years . The workan has alleged that the management of the BSNL has orally terminated his services w.e. f. 31-7-2001 , without any valid reason in absolutely illegal , arbitrary , malafied and discriminatory manner without affording any opportunity of hearing to the workman . The workman has further stated that in absence of regular appointments, the telecom department has been engaging daily wages casual labourers from time to time to meet the exigency of the work. It is alleged by the workman that he has not beengiventemporary status even after being recommended for the same, whereas the Department has granted temporary status and consequential benefits to similarly situated daily rated casual labourers w.r.t. Memo No. 117/ Ch 11 /TDM BRH / Casual Labour/ 11 dated 18-7-2000 of department of Telecommunications , Office of the Telecom District Manager, Bahraich . The workman has also alleged that the management of BSNL has violated various provisions ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 i.e. Section 25N for non - conduction of any inquiry against him or service of any charge sheet , as well as for non-payment of any notice pay or retrenchment compensation , Section 25G for retaining and continuing juniors in service and Section 25H for engaging new persons without affording any opportunity to the workman for employment . Thus , the workman has prayed that the management of BSNLbe directed to consider the case of the workman , to take him back in the service with back wages , to provide him temporary status with consequential benefits and to provide him bonus .

1. The Chief General Manager, Telecom . UP Circle Hazratganj , Lucknow

2. The Telecom District Manager ,

Telecom Deptt. BSNL Bahraich - 271865

AWARD

28-8-2009

I. By Order No. L-40012/37 /2004- IR ( DU ) dated 16-8-2004 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, New Delhi in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub -section (2A ) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) referred this industrial dispute beteen Sh . Diwakar S /o Sh . Sudarshan , Saraswat Nagar , Bahraich and the Chief General Manager , Telecom UP Circle , Hazratganj , Lucknow , the Telecom District Manager Telecom Deptt. BSNL , Bahraich- 271865 for adjudication .

4. The management of the BSNL , in its written statement, has disputed the claim of the workman and has submitted that it never engaged the workman in any capacity in the August, 1988 or subsequently, hence , there arise no question of having completed 240 days of service or alleged oral termination of the services of the workman or of violation of any of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 at all . Regarding engagement of the workman on daily wages the management has mentioned that there was a complete ban on engagement of fresh Casual Labourers /Daily Wagers in the department w.e.f. 12-6-1988 . The management of BSNL has submitted that earlier the Casual Labours were engaged on muster roll , but consequent to ban on engagement of Casual Labours/ Daily Wagers w.e.f. June , 1988 no fresh labour has been engaged on muster roll and also , the labours , who were earlier working on muster roll and were covered under 5983 [ भाग -खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

was not competent to engage any daily wager/casual labourer without approval of the competent authority.

grant of temporary status and regularization scheme, have been granted temporary status . The case of the workman does not fall within that category because he was never engaged by the management in any capacity altogether . Thus, the management has prayed that the claim of the workman be rejected being incorrect and misconceived since he was never engaged or appointed in the management of BSNL in any capacity .

5. The workman has filed rejoinder whereby it has only reiterated his averments in the statement of claim and has not introduced any new fact .

6. The workman has filed photo copies of certain documents , less any appointment order, with his statement ofclaim , in support of his case whereas the management has not filed any documents with written statement , although it has disputed the authenticity of the documents filed by the workman .

9. It is well settled that if a party challenges the legality oforder the burden lies upon him to prove illegality of the order and if no evidence is produced the party- invoking jurisdiction of the court must fail . In the present case burden was on the workman to set out the grounds to challenge the validity of the termination order and to prove the alleged termination was illegal but the workman did not appear for evidence nor produced any other documentary evidence with the result that there is no material in rebuttal of the management evidence . It was the case ofthe workman that he had worked for more than 240 days in the year concerned. This claim has been denied by the management therefore , it was for the workman to lead evidence to show that he had in fact worked upto 240 days in theyear preceding his alleged termination . In(2002) 3 SCC 25 Range Forest Officer vs. S.T. Hadimani the Hon'ble Apex Court has observed as under :

7. The workman has not examined himself in support of his claim . It reveals from the proceedings of the case thatdespite sufficient opportunities given to the workman he did not appear for evidence in support of his claim , therefore , presumption was drawn on. 14-7-2005 that he did not want to produce evidence in support of his claim and the case was fixed for evidence of the opposite party. In support of its case the management has submitted affidavit of Sh . Ram Charan Divisional Engineer (HQ) Telecom District Manager, Bahraich but he has not been cross examined by the workman side . It also appears that C-20 was moved on behalf of the workman to recall the earlier order dated 14-7-2005 . In the interest ofjustice vide order dated 23-3-2006 an opportunity was given to the workman to produce his evidence but he did not appear and again on 23-10-2006 presumption was drawn that worker did not want to produce evidence and case was fixed for evidence of the opposite party. Subsequently, application C- 26 was moved on behalf of the workman to recall the order dated 23-10-2006 and vide order dated 13-2-2007 , the earlier order dated 23-10-2006 was recalled and further opportunity was given to the workman to adduce his evidence despite this he did not avail the opportunity and ultimately , the case was fixed for argument. But on the said date neither the workman nor the representative on behalf of the management appeared, therefore , the case was reserved for award.

10. In the present case , the workman has even not examined himself on oath in support of his claim that he had worked for 240 days during the period as stated in his statement of claim. He has not produced any original documents in support of his claim moreover , the genuineness of photocopies of the documents submitted by the workman has been questioned by the opposite party. Merely pleadings are no substitute for proof Initial burden of establishing the fact of continuance work for 240 days , in preceding 12 months from the date of his alleged termination was on the workman but he has failed to discharge above burden , therefore , in view of the aforementioned legal position there is no material for recording findings that workman had worked more than 240 days in the preceding year and the alleged unjust order oftermination was ever passed by the management .

11. Thus , the workman is not entitled for any relief as claimed by him . The reference under adjudication is answered accordingly.

12. Award as above .

Lucknow

28-08-2009

8. The management witness Sh . Ram Charan has stated in his affidavit that workman was neither appointed by the opposite party on any Class IV post nor he was engaged as daily wager . There was complete ban on the engagement of fresh casual labourers in the department w.e.f. 12-6-1988 . He has further stated that documents annexed with the claim statement by the workman are not genuine document; The SDE, Mithinpurwa in order to give some undue benefits to his kith and kin , has prepared some bogus document . He has further submitted that SDE

N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer 5984

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 / ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] नई दिल्ली , 7 सितम्बर , 2009

Telecom . UP Circle Hazratganj , Lucknow, the Telecom District Manager , Telecom Deptt . BSNL , Bahraich- 271865 foradjudication.

2. The reference under adjudication is :

का.आ. 2725.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 88/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को7-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the action of the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Behraich in Terminating the Services ofSh . Brijesh Saroj S/o Sh . Dukhanti Prasad , Daily Wager w.e.f. 08-10-2001 is Legal and Justified ? ". Ifnot, to what relief the Workman is entitled ? " [सं. एल-40012/33 /2004- आई आर ( डीयू) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 7th September, 2009

S.O. 2725.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 88/2004 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Lucknow as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workmen , whichwas received by the Central Government on 7-9-2009 .

[No. L-40012/ 03/2004- IR (DU ) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

Present : N. K. Purohit , Presiding Officer.

1. D. No. 88/2004

Ref. No. L- 40012/33 /2004- IR( DU) dated : 16-8-2004

BETWEEN

Sh . Brijesh Saroj S/ o Sh . Dukhanti Prasad Shivalya Bagh , By - Pass Road, The.Nanpara Bahraich (U.P. )

AND

1. The Chief General Manager Telecom . UP Circle

Hazratganj , Lucknow

2. The Telecom District Manager , Telecom Deptt . BSNL Bahraich -271865 .

3. The case of the workman , Sh . Brijesh Saroj , in brief is that the workman was engaged by the management ofBSNL , in April 2000 as a daily wage casual labourer (Class 1V post) in serious exigency of departmental work and since then he was working on the said post and has worked for more than 240 days in the preceding years . The workman has alleged that the management of the BSNL has orally terminated his services w.e.f. 08-10-2001 , without any valid reason in absolutely illegal , arbitrary, malafied and discriminatory manner without affording any opportunity of hearing to the workman . The workman has further stated that in absence of regular appointments , the telecom department has been engaging daily wages casual labourers from time to time to meet the exigency of the work . It is alleged by the workman that he has not beengiven temporary status even after being recommended for the same , whereas the Department has granted temporary status and consequential benefits to similarly situated daily rated casual labourers w.r.t. Memo No. 117/ Ch II /TDM BRH/ Casual Lahour /II dated 18-7-2000 of department ofTelecommunications , Office of the Telecom District Manager, Bahraich . The workman has also alleged that the management of BSNL has violated various provisions ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 i.e. Section 25 N for non - conduction of any inquiry against him or service of any charge sheet , as well as for non -payment of any notice pay or retrenchment compensation , Section 25 G for retaining and continuing juniors in service and Section 25H for engaging new, persons without affording any opportunity to the workman for employment . Thus , the workman has prayed that the management of BSNL be directed to consider the case of the workman , to take him back in the service with back wages to provide him temporary status with consequential benefits and to provide him bonus .

AWARD

28-08-2009

1. By order No. L - 40012/ 33 / 2004 - IR (DU ) dated: 16-08-2004 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub section ( 1 ) and sub - section ( 2A ) ofSSection 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute between Sh . Brijesh Saroj , S/ o Sh. Dukhanti Prasad , Shivalya Bagh , By - Pass Road, The . Nanpara, Bahraich and the Chief General Manager ,

4. The management of the BSNL, in its written statement, has disputed the claim of the workman and has submitted that it never engaged the workman in any capacity in the April 2000 or subsequently , hence , there arise no . question of having completed 240 days of service or alleged oral termination of the services of the workman or of violation of any of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947 at all . Regarding engagement of the workman on daily wages the management has mentioned that there was a complete ban on engagement of fresh 5985 [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

4. Letter written by DGM ( Admn .) to Asstt . DirectorGeneral, BSNL regarding regulariza- tion of labourer left out cases alongwith list which is not legible (4/26).

Casual Labourers /Daily Wagers in the Department w.e.f. 12-06-1988 . The management of BSNL has submitted that earlier the Casual Labours were engaged on muster roll, but consequent to ban on engagement of Casual Labourers /Daily Wagers w.e.f. June, 1988 no fresh labour has been engaged on muster roll and also , the labours , who were earlier working on muster roll and were covered under grant of temporary status and regularization scheme, have been granted temporary status . The case of the workman does not fall within that category because he was never engaged by the management in any capacity altogether . Thus , the management has prayed that the claim of the workman be rejected being incorrect and misconceived since he was never engaged or appointed in the management of BSNL in any capacity.

8. The management witness Sh . Ram Charan has stated in his affidavit that workman was neither appointed by the opposite party any class IV post nor he was engaged adailywager. There was complete ban on the engagement of fresh casual labourers in the department w.e.f. 12-6- 1988. He has further stated that documents annexed with the claim statement by the workman are not genuine document the SDE , Mithinpurwa in order to give some undue benefits to his kith and kin , has prepared some bogus documents . He has further submitted that SDE was not competent to engage any daily wager /casual labourer without approval of the competent authority.

5. The workman has filed rejoinder whereby it has only reiterated his averments in the statement of claim and has not introduced any new fact.

6. The workman has filed photocopies of certain documents , less any appointment order , with his statement of claim , in support of his case whereas the management has not filed any documents with written statement , although it has disputed the authenticity of the documents filedby the workman .

9.. It iswell settled that if a party challenges the legality oforder the burden lies upon him to prove illegality of the order and if no evidence is produced the party- invoking jurisdiction of the court must fail . In the present case burden was on the workman to set out the grounds to challenge the validity of the termination order and to prove the alleged termination was illegal . It was the case ofthe workman that he had worked for more than 240 days in the year concerned . This claim has been denied by the management therefore , it was for the workman to lead evidence to show that he had in fact worked upto 240 days in the year preceding his alleged termination . In (2002) 3 SCC 25 Range Forest Officer vs S. T. Hadimani the Hon'ble Apex Court has observed as under:

7. The workman has examined himself in support of his claim . He has stated in his statement on oath that he had worked as Engine Operator from April 2000 to August 2001 at Mithinpurwa and he had also performed the work ofExchange Fault Repairer as Casual Labour. He was getting Rs . 1200/ - per month as salary and payments have been made to him by ACG- 17 vouchers as such he had worked more than 240 days . In cross -examination he has stated that his father was SDE and he had appointed him and his cousin Amarnath by oral orders but subsequently disengaged him due to pressure of the superior officer . He wasterminated in Oct. 2001 but exact date is not known to him. In his evidence he has not referred and proved any document though he has filed photocopies of the following documents :-

" It was the case of the claimant tha he had so worked but this claim was denied by the appellant. It was then for the claimant to lead evidence to show that he had in fact worked for 240 days in the year preceding his termination . Filing of an affidavit is only his own statement in his favour and that can not be regarded as sufficient evidence for any court ortribunal to come to the conclusion that a workman had, in fact, worked for 240 days or order or record ofappointment or engagement for that period was produced by the workrnan . On this ground alone , the award is liable to be set aside ."

1. Letter written by SD Telecom, Mithinpurwa, Bahraich dt . 16-2-2001 addressed to the DET, Bahraich alongwith copy of revised proforma said to be given by the workman (4/17 &4/18).

2. Copy of the order of DET , Telecom District Manager, Bahraich dt . 18-7-2000 regarding granting of temporary status to 14 other casual labourers mentioned therein (4/19) .

3. Photocopy of letterdt - 8-6-2001 said to be written by SDE Telecom, TDE , Bahraich for considering the six other casual labourers for regularization (4/21 ) .

10. In the present case the workman has examined himself but it reveals from his evidence that he was appointed by oral order by his father who was working as SDE by oral order, no appointment letter was ever issued to him . The workman has not adduced any documentary evidence as regard payment of his alleged salary i.e. Rs. 1200/-per month . The documents letter dt. 18-7-2001 (4/19) letterdt . 8-6-2001 (4/21 ) are not pertaining to the workman and list of the casual worker which has been enclosed 34399705-18 5986

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009/ASVINA 11 , 1931

with the letter said to be written by the DGM to Asstt . Director General is not legible . The letter dt 16.2-2001 of SDE Telecom is photo copy and the said document has not been referred & proved by the workman . Moreover, the genuineness of the copies of the documents filed by the workman has been questioned by the opposite party. In such circumstances burden was on the workman to prove the disputed documents but he has failed to do so . Accordingly to principle laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the aforementioned case law, filing of affidavit is only his own statement in his favour and that can not be considered as sufficient evidence . The burden of establishing the facts of continuance work of 240 days in preceding 12 months from the date of his alleged termination was on the workman but he has failed to discharge above burden therefore , in view of aforemention legal position there is no sufficient material for recording finding that workman had continuously worked more than 240days in preceding year and the alleged unjust order of termination was ever passed by the management .

11. Thus , the workman is not entitled for any relief as claimed by him . The reference under adjudication is answered accordingly.

12. Award as above .

LUCKNOW

28-08-2009

N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 10 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2726. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.पी.डब्ल्यू.डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध मेंनिर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 88/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [सं. एल -42011 /52/2006- आई. आर. ( डी.यू.. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th September , 2009 S.O. 2726. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Govemment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 88/2006) ofthe Central Govemment Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. 1 , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of C.P.W.D. and their workman , which was received bythe Central Government on 10-9-2009 .

[No. L-42011 /52/2006- IR(DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT NO . 1 , NEW DELHI, KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX, DELHI

I. D. No. 88/2006

Shri Nanu Ram S /o Shri Algu Ram ,

R/o 507, Sector 7 ,

R.K. Puram, New Delhi .

...Workman

Versus

TheExecutiveEngineer ( C ) ,

C.P.W.D. Parliamentary Works Division III ,

I. P. Bhawan . New Delhi .

... Management

AWARD

Nanu Ramjoined as daily rated mason with C.P. W.D. on 6-12-80 . He rendered continuous service with the munagement till 12-2-86 , the date when his services were regularized . He presents that the Apex Court in Surender Singh Vs. Engineer in Chief CPWD . decided on 17-1-86. has ruled that all daily rated workmen be regularized in service from the date of their initial employment , in case they have put in six months of continuous service . Instructions , issued by D.G. (Works) CPWD on 4-7-88 , make it clear that a workman , who had performed continuous service for a period of two years in a particular category, is entitled to be regularized in that position . He presents that the management was under a bounden duty to regularize his service w.e.f. 6-12-80. He raised a demand in that regard , which was not complied with Consequently. he raised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer. Since conciliation proceedings failed, the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide Order No. L-420 11 /52/ 2006(IR(DU) dated 08-11-2006 with following terms:

"Whether the demand of the All India CPWD( MRM) Karamchari Sangathan, Delhi for regularization of services of Shri Nanu Ram S/o Shri Algu Ram , Mason w.e.f. 6-12-1980 is legal and justified? Ifyes, towhat benefits the workman is entitled to ?"

2. Nanu Ram filed his claim statement , pleading therein that he was employed by the management as a mason on 6-12-80 . He rendered continuous service with the management and his services were regularized on 12-2-86 . Management was under an obligation to regularize hisservices from the date of his initial appointment , in the light of the precedent laid by the Apex Court in Surender Singh's case . He presents that the action of the management in not regularizing his services from the ' date ofhis initial appointment is illegal . He seeks regularization ofhisservices from the date ofhis initial appointment , viz 6-12-80.

3.Management contests the claim petition pleading thatthe workman did not fulfil requisite qualification of [भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

highly skilled artisan . He had not put in continuous service of 240 days . When he rendered continuous service for 240. days , his services were regularized w.e.f. 12-2-86 . The precedent in Surender Singh's case is not applicable to him . It was claimed that Nanu Ram is not entitled for regularization in service from the date of his initial appointment .

4. During the course of adjudication , the management opted to regularize service of the workman from 6-12-80 for the purposes of earning gratuity etc. An entry in his service book was recorded to that effect . Nanu Ram made a statement on oath that since his services has been regularized by the management ,w.e.f. 6-12-80 for the purpose of gratuity and an entry has been recorded in his service book to this effect , copy of which is Ex.WWI/ 1 , his claim stands satisfied . He claimed that an award may be passed , accordingly.

5. Perusal of Ex . WW 1/1 makes it clear that Nanu Ram rendered 296 days continuous service in the year 1981 , 303 days continuous service in the year 1982, 308 days continuous service in the year 1983 and 557 days continuous service from 21-12-83 to 11-2-86 . In his service book an entry was made to this effect , making it clear that the aforesaid service , rendered by Nanu Ram, shall be counted for the purpose of his gratuity . This entry , recorded by the management in the service book of the workman, could warn cockles of his heart . The workman felt satisfied and requests this Tribunal to make an award accordingly . In view of the aforesaid facts and statement made by the workman it is concluded that grieyance between him and the management stands satisfied. Now there remains no dispute between the parties . An Award is accordingly passed. It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication .

DR . R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 10 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2727. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/एलसी/आर/41 /98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -40012/ 192/96- आई. आर. (डी.यू. ) ]

सुरेन्द्रसिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th September , 2009 S.O. 2727. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. CGIT/LC/R/41 /98) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial

5987

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 10-9-2009.

[No. L-40012/192/96- IR(DU)]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT/ LC/R/41 /98

Presiding Officer : Shri Mohd . Shakir Hasan Shri A. P. Parajwar,

Workman/Union At& PO: Pandharkawada, Gandhi Ward, Teh . Kelapur , Distt . Yavatmal (MS)

Versus.

TheDivisional Engineer, Telecom , LongDistance, CTO Compound, Nagpur(MS)

Management

AWARD

Passed on this 24th day of August, 2009 1. TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L-40012/ 192/96 - IR(DU) dated 20-2-98 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal:- :

"Whether the action of the management ofDivisional Engineer Telecom, Long Distance , Nagpur in dismissing Shri A.P. Parajwar, Driver from his services is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to? "

2. The case of the workman in short is that the workman was appointed as Motor Driver on daily wage basis against permanent post w.e.f. 1-6-1979 and he met with an accident on 30-4-81 while on duty. After becoming fit, he went to resume his duty but he was informed orally that his servicewas terminated on his absence . He preferred a reference vide case No. CGIT/LC /R/ 31 / 1984 and this Court passed an award on 13-11-1984 declaring the termination as void and directed to reinstate with back wages. The workman is said to have resumed his duty on 7-5-86 and after seven days his service was again terminated on 13-5-1986 and a reference Case No. R/ 167/ 1987 was again filed before this Court and the award was passed on 24-4-1999 directing to be reinstated with full back wages and to consider for regularization and absorption against the permanent post.

3. The further case of the workman is that he was not allowed tojoin at Pandharkawada and was transferred to Yavatmal where he joined on 16-11-1992 on daily wages:

5988

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 3 , 2009 /ASVINA 11 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC. 3(ii)]

The Predecessor's Court directed the management to provethe alleged misconduct of the workman .

6. Nowthe important point for consideration is that as to whether the management has been able to prove the misconduct of the workman.

No action was taken for his absorption. From there, he was again transferred to Pusad without any reason to harass him. Thơ Department of Telecommunication decidedthatall the drivers working in the units be treated as fixed duty staff and his duty hours was fixed from 10.00 AM to 6.00 PM without giving lunch break at least for half an hour . Thereafter the workman was served with a chargesheet in English as such , he requested to supply the same inMarathi version but the same was not supplied with a plea that in Courts , he has filed cases in English language. It is stated that enquiry was held on 26th & 27th September, 1995 and the enquiry report was submitted on 30-9-95. On the basis of the enquiry report, the Division Engineer dismissed the workman which is bad in law. The workman is said to have not regularized inspite of the order of the Hon'ble Court . On these grounds , it is submitted that theworkman be reinstated with backwages.

7. The management as well as the workman have adduced oral and documentary evidence in the case. Now let us examine the evidence of the management as the burden was on the management to prove the misconduct . The order dated 1-6-99 shows that the workman has admitted all the papers of the departmental enquiry (in short DE) . It is an admitted fact that four charges were levelled against him . One of the charge was of insubordination . The management has filed the depositions of the witnesses namely Shri Sheoshanker Nagre, Shri Jogan Sukhdeo , Shri Basdeo Thakare and Shri Baliram Maske which are paper Nos . 10/6 to 10/11 . The depositions ofthese witnesses are admitted by the workman. It is argued on behalf ofthe workman that these witnesses have not been examined in the case and the workman is highly prejudiced . Ido not agree with the contention ofthe learned counsel for the workman because theirdepositions are already admitted which are deposed before the Enquiry Officer. The facts admitted is need not to be proved. These depositions appear to be admissible in law in view of the admission . The depositions clearly show that the witnesses had corroborated the charge of insubordination causing Inconvenience in the performance ofthe duty to other officials and also losses of revenue to the department . The depositions prove the charge of insubordination which was a misconduct.

8. The management has also filed paper Nos . 25 , 26, 28, 29 & 36by which explanations were asked from the workman for disobeying the orders . These papers are also admitted by the workman . These letters of show cause further corroborates the case of insubordination of the workman.

9. The management has examined Shri Sadashiv Shinde as a witness . He is Sub- Divisional Engineer, Pusad. He has also supported this fact that the workman refused to obey the orders of the superiors and was habitual absentee. In cross- examination , he has stated that in the alleged period , he was not posted. It is urged that he has no personal knowledge and those who had personal knowledge had not been examined in the case . I find that no prejudiced is caused to the workman because the workmanhas admitted all the depositions of the witnesses which are examined before the Enquiry Officer .

4. The management appeared and filed reply(written statement ) . The case of the management, inter alia, is that the workman was always in a mood to agitate with the superior and was not performing his duty obediently. As such all the time, his service was terminated but due to technical lacunae the workman was reinstated . It is admitted that the workman was appointed on casual basis as MotorDriver in the Section ofOptical Fibre Cable Sub- Division, Pusad since. 10-11-94. It is stated that the department complied all the earlier orders of the Hon'ble Court but the workman was dismissed from his services forhis own fault . It is stated that no vehicle was available at Pandharkawada and therefore transferred to Yavatmal and later Pusad and there was vacancy there . The further case of the management is that the workman was daily rated but after reinstatement, he refused to accept the monthly payment through Muster Roll . He also refused to perform dutyafter 10.00 to 18.00 hours . In very emergent work as such department was compelled to engage driver form outside to meet emergent cable fault causing heavy losses of revenue to the department . There were charges ofhabitual absentee, insubordination and rude behavior with the superiorwhich led to the initiation of departmental enquiry and Shri V.S. Bathe SDE(Or ) Pusad was appointed asEnquiry Officer who conducted the enquiry and gave full opportunity to defend himself. After enquiry, the EnquiryOfficer found the charges proved and submitted enquiry report to the Disciplinary Authority. The enquiry report was communicated to the workman but no reply was given by the workman . The Disciplinary Authority after considering the report found the charges established against the workman and passed an order of dismissal . On these grounds , it is submitted that the reference be dismissed.

10. On the other hand , the workman Shri Ashok Pandurang Purjwar is examined in the case . He has stated a vague assertion that he had not committed any misconduct . He has not specifically denied the evidence of the witnesses who had deposed before the Enquiry 5. The preliminary issue that the enquiry conducted against the workman was legal and proper or not, was decided by the predecessor's Court vide order dated 6-7-2001 whereby it was held that the department enquiry conducted against the workman was not just and proper.

5989 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 3 , 2009/आश्विन 11 , 1931

Officer and the depositions ofthose witnesses are admitted by the workman which proves misconduct . Thus it is established that the workman was guilty of insubordination and is amount to misconduct .

11. Another important point is as to whether the workman Shri A. P. Parajwar threatened the staff frequently and behaved in a disorderly manner and made all attempts to interrupt the rout of maintenance or not .

for non-compliance of the direction of authority. It is not outofplace to say that these three papers appear to have been admitted by the workman because the order dated 1-6-99 speaks that all the departmental enquiry papers of the management have been admitted by the workman but these papers show that "not" is added before " admitted" . The practice is that if the party does not admit , he writes denied. The entire aspects show that interpolation is also done in the Court's record . Thus this charge appears to have been proved that department initiated the process for regularization but intentionally the workman did not cooperateto frustrate the direction of the Court.

16. The workman has filed two awards which are Paper No. 3/7 & 3/11 . These awards are also admitted by the management . These awards simply show that previouslythe workman was terminated and the termination orders were set aside on technical grounds. The award further shows that there was an observation that if the management wants to terminate his services , they will have to do so in accordance with the provisions of the Act .

12. To support the charge , the management again referred the admitted deposition which is marked as Paper Nos . 10/6 . The deposition clearly shows that he had threatened the staff and behaved in a disorderly manner . The management has filed a Written complaint of J.T.O. of Pusad dated 10-5-95 . This complaint is also admitted by the workman . This complaint shows that he was in a habit to argue without any reason and used unparliamentary language and interrupted the route . Paper No. 10/35 is also admitted . This is also a complaint of Sheo Shanker Nagre. He had complained that the workman threatened him to proceed on leave failing which he would met with accident of death . The documentary evidences which are admitted by the workman show that the said charge is proved. There is no reason to disbelieve these evidences when the workman has admitted himself.

17. On the basis of the discussion made above , I find the charges against the workman are proved and the action of the management in dismissing the service of the workman is legal and justified.

18. Accordingly the award is passed against the workman and in favour of the management without any order of costs .

13. Another important point is as to whether the department initiated the process to regularize the workman and the workman cooperated in the said process in compliance ofthe order of the Court .

19. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

MOHD . SHAKIR HASAN , PresidingOfficer

नई दिल्ली, 14 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2728.- राष्ट्रपति, डा. मंजूनिगम को 03-09-2009 से केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण- सह- श्रम न्यायालय , जयपुर को पीठासीन अधिकारी के रूप में 65 वर्ष की आयु पूरी होने अर्थात् 26-08-2014 तक अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, इनमें जो भी पहले हो, नियुक्त करती हैं ।

[सं. ए-11016/2/2005-सीएलएस-11 ]

पी. के. ताम्रकार , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th September , 2009 14. In order to initiate the process of regularization to the workman , it is stated that the department had taken steps but the workman did not cooperate and did not submit the required certificates only in order to frustrate the compliance of the Court or he had no requisite qualification for the post . To prove this charge, the management has filed documents which are admitted by theworkman. The letter dated 3-1-95 (Paper No. 39) is filed to show that Original School Leaving Certificate was demanded bythe management . Letter dated 15-5-95 ( Paper No. 47) is filed to show that several reminders were given to the workman to deposit the required documents . These letters are admitted by the workman . The management has also filed office order of the Authority ( Paper No. 44) to show that it was directed by the authority that in case the workman did not file the requisite documents , the report was also to be given to the Court . This document is also admitted by the workman . These documents show that the workman- was not cooperating and was unable to comply the order ofthe Court .

S.O. 2728. The President is pleased to appoint Dr. Manju Nigam as Presitling Officer of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court, Jaipur w.e.f. 03-09-2009 till she attains the age 65 years i.e. upto 26-08-2014 or until further orders , whichever is earlier.

[No. A- 11016/2/2005 -CLS- II ] P. K. TAMRAKAR, Under Secy.

15. Paper No. 42 & 45 are two letters . These letters are filed to show that the workman had not submitted documents and form for considering the regularization of the workman . Paper No..46 is the letter of District Engineer,Yavatmal for initiating disciplinary proceedings

Printed by the Manager, Govt . of India .Press , Ring Road , Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054.