This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

सत्यमेव जयते

REGD. NO. D. L. ( N ) 04 /0007 /2003--05 भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 491

नई दिल्ली, नवम्बर 29 दिसम्बर 5 , 2009 , शनिवार/अग्रहायण 8 - अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

No. 49 ] NEW DELHI , NOVEMBER 29 - DECEMBER 5 , 2009 , SATURDAY /AGRAHAYANA 8-AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II-खण्ड -उप - खण्ड ( ii ) PART II-Section 3-Sub- section ( ii )

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

वित्त मंत्रालय

(राजस्व विभाग )

नई दिल्ली , 18 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ 3249. केन्द्रीय सरकार ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम 4 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय नारकोटिक ब्यूरो , ग्वालियर के निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को , जिनके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारीवृंद ने हिंदी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है: - 1. जिला अफीम अधिकारी नीमच, प्रथम खंड 2. जिला अफीम अधिकारी मंदसौर, तृतीय खंड 3. जिला अफीम अधिकारी चित्तौड़गढ़ , प्रथम खंड 4. जिला अफीम अधिकारी चित्तौड़गढ़ , तृतीय खंड 5. जिला अफीम अधिकारी भीलवाड़ा, राजस्थान 6. जिला अफीम अधिकारी झालावाड़ा , राजस्थान 7. जिला अफीम अधिकारी कोटा, राजस्थान

8. जिला अफीम अधिकारी बाराबंकी, उत्तरप्रदेश 4233 G1/ 2009

(7673)

9. जिला अफीम अधिकारी मंदसौर, प्रथम खंड 10. जिला अफीम अधिकारी प्रतापगढ़ , राजस्थान

गरौट, मध्य प्रदेश 11. जिला अफीम अधिकारी

12. जिला अफीम अधिकारी मंदसौर , द्वितीय खंड 13. जिला अफीम अधिकारी नीमच , द्वितीय खंड

सिंगोली , मध्य प्रदेश 14. अधीक्षक ( निवारक ) एवं आसूचना प्रकोष्ठ

गरोठ , जिला मंदसौर 15. अधीक्षक (निवारक ) एवं आसूचना प्रकोष्ठ

जावरा , मध्य प्रदेश आसूचना प्रकोष्ठ 16. अधीक्षक ( निवारक ) एवं

चित्तौड़गढ़ , राजस्थान 17. अधीक्षक ( निवारक ) एवं आसूचना प्रकोष्ठ

प्रतापगढ़ , राजस्थान आसूचना प्रकोष्ठ 18. अधीक्षक ( निवारक ) एवं

19. अधीक्षक ( निवारक ) एवं आसूचना प्रकोष्ठ उज्जैन , मध्य प्रदेश 7674

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii)] नईदिल्ली

Garoth , Distt Mandsaur 20. अधीक्षक ( निवारक ) एवं आसूचना प्रकोष्ठ

Intelligence cell 15. Superintendent (Preventive)&

फैजाबाद, उत्तर प्रदेश

Zawra,MP

21. अधीक्षक ( निवारक ) एवं आसूचना प्रकोष्ठ

16. Superintendent (Preventive)& Intelligence cell

Chittorgarh , Rajasthan 22. अधीक्षक ( निवारक ) एवं आसूचना प्रकोष्ठ भवानीमण्डी, राजस्थान

रतलाम, मध्य प्रदेश

17. Superintendent (Preventive) & Intelligence cell

23. अधीक्षक ( निवारक ) एवं आसूचना प्रकोष्ठ

Partapgarh , Rajasthan गाजीपुर, उत्तर प्रदेश

18. Superintendent (Preventive) & Intelligencecell

24. अधीक्षक ( निवारक ) एवं आसूचना प्रकोष्ठ

Ujjain, MP

इंदौर, मध्य प्रदेश

25. अधीक्षक ( निवारक) एवं आसूचना प्रकोष्ठ

19. Superintendent (Preventive) & Intelligence cell

NewDelhi

जयपुर, राजस्थान

26. अधीक्षक ( निवारक ) एवं आसूचना प्रकोष्ठ

20. Superintendent (Preventive) & Intelligence cell

Faizabad, UP

[फा.सं. - 11012/1/2008 -हिंदी-2 ] मधु शर्मा , निदेशक ( राजभाषा )

21. Superintendent (Preventive)& Intelligence.cell

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department ofRevenue)

Bhawani Mandi , Rajasthan

New Delhi , the 18th November , 2009

22. Superintendent (Preventive) & Intelligence cell

Ratlam,MP

23. Superintendent (Preventive) & Intelligence cell

Gazipur,UP

S.O. 3249.-In pursuance of Sub Rule 4 ofrule 10 of the Official Language ( use of official purpose of the union) Rule, 1976 the Central Government hereby notifies the following Offices of the Central Narcotics Bureau , Gwalior, the 80% Staff where of have acquired the working knowledge ofHindi : -

24. Superintendent (Preventive) & Intelligence coll

1. Distt . opium officer Neemuch , Ist Division

Indore, UP

2. Distt . opium officer Mandsaur , 3rd Division

25. Superintendent (Preventive) & Intelligence cell

3. Distt . opium officer

Chittorgarh , Ist Division

Jaipur, Rajasthan Chittorgarh , 3rd Division

4. Distt . opium officer

26. Superintendent (Preventive) & Intelligence cell

5. Distt. opium officer Bhilwara, Rajasthan

6. Distt. opium officer Jalawar, Rajasthar

[ F. No. -11012/ 1 /2008 - Hindi - 2 | MADHU SHARMA , Director ( Ol . ) 7. Distt . opium officer Kota, Rajasthan

(केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )

Barabanki , UP

8. Distt . opium officer

नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2009

Mandsaur, 1st Division

9. Distt. opium officer

10. Distt . opium officer Partapgarh, Rajasthan

Garoth , MP

11. Distt . opium officer

12. Distt . opium officer Mandsaur, 2nd Division

T 13. Distt. opium officer Neemuch , 2nd Division

Singoli , MP

14. Superintendent (Preventive) & Intelligence cell

का.आ. 3250.-सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5 ग और 5घ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2007-08 के आगे से संगठन गांधी मैमोरियल लेपरोसी फाउंडेशन , वर्धा, को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगे ' अन्य संस्था ' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है, नामतः [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

7675

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

(i) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदश राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए क्रिया जाएगा ;

(said Rules) from assessment year 2007-08 onwards in the category of' other Institution ' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely :

( ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा;

(1) The sums paid to the approved organization shalt be utilized for scientific research;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

(iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञऋमिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग बही-खाता रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो, उक्त अधिनियम की श्राश 288 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कशएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत्त करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने बाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of account in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub - section (2 ) of section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to theCommissioner of Income-tax or the Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the duc date of furnishing the return of income under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 139 of the sajd Act;

(iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित ऐसे विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific rescarch and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referredto above.

(क) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization :

(ख) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(a) fails to maintain separate . books of accounts referred to in sub - paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 : or

(ग) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एवं प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(b) fails to furnish its audit report refer ed to in sub- paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 : or

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub- paragraph ( iv) o paragraph 1 ; or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine : or (ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5ग और 5घ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहींकरेगा ।

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions ofclause ( ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of section 35 ofthe said Act, read with rules 5C and SE of the said Rules .

[अधिसूचना सं. 85/2009/फा.सं. 203/119/2008- आ.क.नि.- II ] अजय गोयल , निदेशक ( आ.क.नि. II )

[Notification No. 85/2009/ F.No.203/ 119/2008/ΙΤA- 1 ] AJAY GOYAL . , Director ( ITA- 11 ) (Central Board of Direct Taxes) New Delhi , the 26th November , 2009

नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3251. - सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली) के नियम डंग तथा 5ड. के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ कर निर्धारण S.O. 3250.- It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Gandhi Memorial Leprosy Foundation, Wardha, has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income- tax Act , 1961 ( said Act ) , read with rules 5C and 5E of the Income - tax Rules , 1962 7676

SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009 /AGRAHAYANA 14. 1931

वर्ष 2009-10 से आगे संगठन इंटिग्रेटेड रिसर्च एंड ऐक्शन फोर डेवलपमेंट , नई दिल्ली , को निम्नलिखित शतों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगे " अन्य संस्था " की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , नामत :-

(i ) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग सामाजिक विज्ञान में अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा ;

Research in Community Health , Mumbai has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 ofthe Income- tax Act , 1961 ( said Act) , read with rules 5C and 5E ofthe Income-tax Rulcs , 1962 ( said Rules ) from Assessment year 2009-10 onwards in the category of other Institution' . partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely:

(i ) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;

(ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से सामाजिक विज्ञान अथवा संख्यिकी विज्ञान में अनुसंधान करेगा;

( ii ) The approved organization shall carry out the scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students ;

(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग बही- खाता रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत् सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;

(iii ) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of account in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research, reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research, get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section (2 ) of section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income- tax or the Director of Income -tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 139 of the said Act;

( iv ) अनुमोदित संगठन सामाजिक विज्ञान में अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित ऐसे विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above .

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the

approval if the approved organization: ....

(क) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(a) fails to maintain separate books of account referred to in sub - paragraph ( iii) of paragraph 1 ; or (ख) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph (iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(c) failsto furnish its statement of donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub - paragraph ( iv ) of paragraph 1: or (घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine ; or

(c) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the said Act , read with rules 5C and 5E ofthe said Rules .

(ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5ड. के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[Notification No. 86/2009 /F , No. 203 / 3 /2009 - ΙΤΑ - 111 AJAY GOYAL , Director ( ITA - II ) [ अधिसूचना सं. 86/2009/फा.सं. 203/3/2009-आ. क.नि. - 11 ] अजय गोयल , निदेशक ( आ.क.नि. - 11 )

नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2009

New Delhi , the 26th November , 2009

का.आ. 3252. - सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5 ग तथा 5ङ के S.O.3251 . It is hereby notified for general information that the organization The Foundation for [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( 2 ) के प्रयोजनार्थ कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2009-10 के आगे से संगठन इंटिग्रेटेड रिसर्च एंड ऐक्शन फोर डेवलपमेंट , नई दिल्ली , को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगे " अन्य संस्था " की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है, नामतः

( ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से सामाजिक विज्ञान अथवा संख्यिकी विज्ञान में अनुसंधान करेगा;

( iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग बही- खाता रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;

(क) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

( ख) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा (ग) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित सामाजिक विज्ञान अथवा सांख्यिकी विज्ञान में अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एवं प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य कलाप करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा

(ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और ऽड. के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड (iii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[ अधिसूचना सं. 87/2009/फा.सं. 203/34/2009- आ.क.नि.- II ] अजय गोयल , निदेशक ( आ.क.नि.- II )

7677

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14, 1931

New Delhi , the 26th November , 2009 S.O. 3252. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Integrated Research and Action for Development ( IRADe) , New Delhi has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( iii ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 ( said Act) , read with rules 5C and SE of the Income -tax Rules , 1962 ( said Rules ) from Assessment year 2009-10 onwards in the category of ' other institution' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely : -

(i) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for research in social sciences ;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out research in social science or statistical research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate booksof accounts in respeet of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub - section ( 2 ) of section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Ineome - tax or the Director of Income -tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 139 of the said Act;

( iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for research in social sciences and a copy of such staternent duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above.

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization: -

(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub - paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 : ог

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of donations received and sums applied for research in social sciences or statistical rescarch referred to in sub - paragraph ( iv) of paragraph 1 ; or

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine ; or (e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( iii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the said Act , read with rules 5C and 5E ofthe said Rules .

[Notification No. 87 /2009/F.No . 203 /34/2009 - ITA - II ] AJAY GOYALL , Director ( ITA - 11 ) 7678

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 26 नवम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 3253. - सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग तथा 5ड. के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2009-10 से आगे संगठन नूरूल इस्लाम एजुकेशनल ट्रस्ट, कन्या- कुमारी को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगे " कालेज " की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है, नामतः

( i ) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

(ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा;

(iii ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता- बही रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप धारा (2 ) के. स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;

( iv ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित ऐसे विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा । 2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(क) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(ख ) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा (ग) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एवं प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा (ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5ग और 5ड. के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[ अधिसूचना सं. 88/ 2009/फा.सं. 203/52/2009-आ.क.नि.- [ 1 ] अजय गोयल , निदेशक ( आ.क.नि.- II )

4 New Delhi , the 26th November , 2009 S.O.3253 . It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Noorul Islam Educational Trust, Kanyakumari has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of sub- section (1) of Section 35 of the Income-tax Act , 1961 (said Act ), read with rules 5C and 5E of the Income-tax Rules , 1962 (said Rules) from Assessment year 2009-10 onwards in the category of' College ' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely: -

(1) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for Scientific research ;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students ;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section (2 ) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to theCommissioner of Income -tax or the Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 139 of the said Act;

(iv) The approved organization shall faintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific researchand and a copyofsuch statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referredto above .

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval ifthe approved organization: -

(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub -paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph (iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement ofdonations received andsums applied for seientific research referred to in sub -paragraph ( iv) of paragraph 1 ; or (d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activitics are not found to be genuine; or (e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions ofclause ( ii ) of sub -section ( 1 ) of section 35 of the said Act , read with rules 5C and 5E ofthe said Rules .

[Notification No. 88 /2009/F.No. 203/52/2009 /ITA-111

AJAY GOYAL , Director ( ITA -- II ) नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3254. सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7679

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

New Delhi , the 26th November , 2009 नियमावली, 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग तथा 5ड. के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( iii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2009-10 से आगे संगठन ग्रेट लेक्स इंस्टिट्यूट आफ मैनेजमेंट , चेन्नई , को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगे " कालेज " की श्रेणी में अनु‌मोदित किया गया है,

नामत :-

S.03254. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Great Lakes Institute of Management, Chennai has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( iii) of sub - section (1 ) of section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (said Act ) , read with rules 5C and SE of the Income- tax Rules , 1962 (said Rules) from Assessment year 2009-10 onwards in the category of' College ' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions, namely: - (i ) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग सामाजिक विज्ञान में अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

( i) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for research in social sciences ;

( ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से सामाजिक विज्ञान अथवा सांख्यिकी अनुसंधान में अनुसंधान करेगा;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out research in social science or statistical research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता-बही रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप धारा (2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता-बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separatc booksof accounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research and gci such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub - section ( 2) of section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such auditduly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income- tax or the Director of Income-tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of ineome under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 139 of the said Act;

(iv) अनुमोदित संगठन सामाजिक विज्ञान में अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित ऐसे विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for research in social sciences and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above:

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization:-

(क) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

( ख) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub - paragraph ( iii) of paragraph 1 : or

(b) fails to furnish its audi report referred to in sub- paragraph (iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(ग) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित सामाजिक विज्ञान अथवा सांख्यिकी अनुसंधान में अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एवं प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for research in social sciences or statistical research referred to in.sub- paragraph ( iv) of paragraph 1 ; or

(घ ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा ; अथवा

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine ; or (ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5ग और 5ड. के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( iii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( iii ) of sub-section ( 1 ) of section 35 of the said Act , read with rules 5C and SE ofthe said Rules .

[अधिसूचना सं. 89/2009/फा.सं. 203/54/2009-आ.क.नि. - 11 ] अजय गोयल , निदेशक ( आ.क.नि. - 11 )

[Notification No. 89/2009/F.No . 203 /54/2009 /ITA - 11 ] AJAYGOYAL , Director ( ITA- II ) 7680

PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009 /AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3255. सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5 ग और 5ड. के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2008-09 से आगे संगठन इंस्टिट्यूट आफ साइन्टिफिक रिसर्ज आन वेदाज ( आई- सर्व ) हैदराबाद , को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगे " अन्य संस्था" की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , नामतः

(ii) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा;

(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता- बही रखेगा जिसमें अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता-बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;

( iv ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित ऐसे विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा । 2.. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापिस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(क) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(ख) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा (ग) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान एवं प्रयुक्त राशि का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(घ ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा (ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5ड. के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[अधिसूचना सं . 90/2009/फा.सं. 203/60/2009-आ.क.नि. - 11 ]

अजय गोयल , निदेशक ( आ.क.नि.- II ) New Delhi , the 26th November , 2009

S.O.3255 . It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Institute of Scientific Research on Vedas ( I - SERVE ) , Hyderabad has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause (iii ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of section 35 of the Income- tax Act , 1961 ( said Act) , read with rules 5C and 5E of the Income-tax Rules , 1962 (said Rules ) from Assessment year 2008-09 onwards in the category of ' other Institution ' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely: -

(i) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research ;

(ii ) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students ;

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books of accounts in respect ofthe sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research and get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub - section ( 2 ) of section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such auditduly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income - tax or the Director of Income- tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 139 of the said Act;

2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization: -

(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 : or

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph (iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub - paragraph ( iv) of paragraph 1 ; or (d) ceases to carry on its rescarch activitics or its research activities are not found to be genuine : or (e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the said Act, read with rules 5C and 5E of the said Rules .

[Notification No. 90/2009 /F.No . 203/60 /2009 /ΙΤΛ- ΙΙΙ

AJAY GOYAL , Director ( ITA - 11 ) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

7681

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

सीमा शुल्क एवं केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क आयुक्त का कार्यालय सेलम , 20 नवम्बर, 2009

संख्या: 04/2009-सीमा शुल्क (एन.टी. )

का. आ. 3256, सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 , की धारा 152 के खंड ( क) के अंतर्गत भारत सरकार , वित्त मंत्रालय , राजस्व विभाग , नई दिल्ली द्वारा दिनांक 1 जुलाई , 1994 को जारी की गई अधिसूचना सं. 33/94- सीमा शुल्क ( एन.टी. ) द्वारा अधोहस्ताक्षरी को प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैं सी. पी. राव , आयुक्त, सीमा शुल्क एवं केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क , सेलम एतद्वारा सर्वे सं. जे/5-74/ 1 , लोअर तलैयातिमंड, ऊटी टाउन ( पू) , ऊटी तालुक, निलगिरी जिला, तमिलनाडु राज्य को संचार और सूचना प्रोद्यौगिकि मंत्रालय , सूचना प्रोद्यौगिकि विभाग , तरमणि चेन्नै , अनुमोदितनुसार सॉफ्टवेयर तकनीकि पार्क योजना हेतु शत - प्रतिशत निर्यातोन्मुख एकक के प्रयोजन के लिए सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम, 1962 , की धारा 9 के अनुसार भाण्डागार स्टेशन घोषित करता हूँ ।

[फा. सं. सी सं VIII/40/05/2009- सीमा शुल्क-नीति]

सी. पी. राव , ( आयुक्त) OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE

Salem, the 20th November , 2009 No. 04/2009 - Customs (NT)

S.O. 3256. In exercise of the powers delegated tothe undersigned , vide Notification No.33 /94 - CUS (NT) dated 1st July, 1994 by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance , Department of Revenue, New Delhi under clause ( a) section 152 of the Customs Act, 1962 , I , C. P. RAO , COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE, SALEM hereby declare SF . No. J/5-74 / 1 located at Lower Thalyattimund , in Ooty town east of Ooty taluk inNilgiris District in the state of Tamil Nadu to be a warehousing Station under Section 9 of the Customs Act, 1962 for the purpose of setting up a 100 % Export Oriented Unit under Software Technology park Scheme of Government of India as approved by the Ministry of Communications & Information Technology, Department ofInformation Technology, Taramani , Channai - 600113 .

[F. No. C. VIII/40/05/2009 - CUS .- POL]

C. P. RAO , Commissioner

विदेश मंत्रालय

(सीपीवी प्रभाग)

नई दिल्ली , 16 नवम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 3257. राजनयिक और कोंसलीय ऑफिसर ( शपथ और फीस) के अधिनियम , 1948 की धारा 2 के खंड ( क) के अनुसरण में, केंद्र सरकार एतद्वारा श्री दिलीप कुमार चावला, सहायक और रमेश कुमार गहलोत , अपर श्रेणी लिपिक को 16-11-2009 से भारत के कौंसलावास , टोंरटों में सहायक कोंसुलर अधिकारी के कर्त्तव्यों का पालन करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[सं. टी 4330/1/2006 ] आर. के. पेरिनडिया, अवर सचिव ( कोंसुलर ) 4233 G1/09-2

MINISTRY OF EXTERNALAFFAIRS (C. P. V. Division )

New Delhi , the 16th November , 2009 S.O. 3257. In pursuance of the clause ( a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and fees ) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948) , the Central Government hereby authorise Shri Dilip Kumar Chawla, Assistant and Shri Ramesh Kumar Gahlaut, UDC in the Consulate General of India , Toronto to perform their duties of Assistant Consular Officers with effect from 16th November , 2009 .

[No. Τ . 4330/1/2006] R. K. PERINDIA , Under Secy . ( Consular ) सांख्यिकी और कार्यक्रम कार्यान्वयन मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 3258. भारतीय सांख्यिकीय संस्थान अधिनियम, 1959 ( सं. 57 ) की धारा 8 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार एतद्द्वारा दिनांक 1-4-09 से 31-3-2011 तक की अवधि के लिए एक समिति का गठन करती है जिसमें निम्नलिखित व्यक्ति शामिल होंगे :-

अध्यक्ष ( i) प्रो . अतुल शर्मा

सदस्य, 13 वां वित्त आयोग

भारत सरकार

हिन्दुस्तान टाइम हाऊस , चौथा तल

कस्तूबा गांधी मार्ग

नईदिल्ली -110001

दूरभाष: 011-23704677

सदस्य (ii ) प्रो. प्रभात पटनायक

प्रोफेसर , अर्थशास्त्र ,

जवाहर लाल नेहरु वि. वि.

नई दिल्ली

दूरभाष: 011-26704421 , 011-26701841

सदस्य (iii) प्रो. एस. पी. मुखर्जी,

भारतीय उत्पादकता, गुणवत्ता एवं

विश्वसनीयता संघ ( आई ए क्यू पी आर )

एडी-276 , सॉल्ट लेक,

कोलकाता-64

मोबाइल: 09831558126

सदस्य (iv) प्रो. सुभाष चन्द्र दत्ता रॉय

एमेरिटस प्रो. ,

इलैक्ट्रिकल अभियांत्रिकी विभाग ,

भारतीय प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थान ,

नईदिल्ली

दूरभाष: 011-26591080

मोबाइल: 09871470136 7682

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

Chairman

सदस्य

( v) प्रो. अनिल गुप्ता ,

भारतीय प्रबंध संस्थान ,

वस्त्रपुर ,

अहमदाबाद -380015

दूरभाष: 079-26324927 , 079-26304970

( i) Prof. Atul Sarma, Member, 13th Finance Commission Government of India Hindustan Time House , 4th Floor Kasturba Gandhi Marg New Delhi - 110001 Tel : 011-23704677

सदस्य

Member (vi ) निदेशक , भारतीय सांख्यिकीय संस्थान , भारतीय सांख्यिकीय संस्थान परिषद् के प्रतिनिधि के रूप में

सदस्य

( ii) Prof. Prabhat Patnaik , Professor ofEconomics , Jawaharlal Nehru University, NewDelhi Tel : 011-26704421,011-26701841

( vii) सां और कार्य. कार्या. मंत्रालय , भारत सरकार से सम्बद्ध वित्तीय सलाहकार

Member

सदस्य

संयोजक

(viii ) सां और कार्य. कार्या. मंत्रालय, मैं भारतीय सांख्यिकीय संस्थान से जुड़े मामलों को देखने वाले निदेशक/उप सचिव

( iii) Prof. S. P. Mukherjee , IndianAssociation for Productivity, Quality and Reliability ( 1AQPR) AD-276 Salt Lake Kolkata-64 Mobile: 09831558126

उक्त समिति को निम्नलिखित कर्त्तव्य सौंपे जाते हैं-

Member

(iv) Prof. Subhash Chandra Dutta Roy Emeritus Prof. , Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of technology NewDelhi , Tel: 011-26591080 Mobile: 09871470136

( i ) कार्य/स्कीमों/परियोजनाओं ( योजना और गैर-योजना , दोनों ) के सम्मत कार्यक्रम की समीक्षा करना तथा बजट अनुमान एवं संशोधित अनुमान में उपलब्ध कराई जाने वाली राशि की सिफारिश करना और भारतीय सांखिकीय संस्थान को सहायता अनुदान प्रदान करने के लिए वित्तीय अनुदानों के संबंध में सिफारिशें करना;

Member

(v) Prof. Anil Gupta Indian Institute of Management , Vastrapur, Ahmadabad- 380015 Tel: 079-26324927,079-26304970

Member

(vi) Director Indian Satistical Institute as representative of Indian Statistical Institute Council .

(ii) (क ) उन कार्यों ( योजना और गैर- योजना , दोनों ) के कार्यक्रम दर्शाने वाला विवरण तैयार करना जिन्हें वित्तीय वर्ष के दौरान आई एस आई, कोलकाता द्वारा आरम्भ करने की सहमति बनी है और जिनके लिए केन्द्र सरकार निधियां उपलब्ध करा सकती है तथा इस विवरण को केन्द्र सरकार को प्रस्तुत करना , तथा साथ ही ऐसे कार्यों के संबंध में सामान्य वित्तीय अनुमान तैयार करना;

Member (ख) कार्य से संबधित कार्यक्रमों से जुड़ी मुख्य बातों का निर्धारण, करना ।

( vii ) Financial Adviser attached to the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation Government of India

Member समिति जब भी बैठक करेगी , इसके कार्यवृत्त सरकार को प्रस्तुत करेगी । समिति जिसका मुख्यालय नई दिल्ली में स्थित होगा , को सचिवालय सहायता सां. और कार्य. कार्या . मंत्रालय प्रदान करेगा ।

( viii ) Director/DS handling 1S1 matters in MOSPI

Convener [सं. आई-11011/1/2009-समन्वय ] अरविंद कुमार , संयुक्त सचिव

2. Following duties are assigned of the said Committee.

MINISTRY OF STATISTICS AND PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION

New Delhi , the 16th November , 2009

(i) Review ofthe agreed programme of work/ schemes/ projects ( both Plan and Non - Plan ) and make recom- mendations of the amountto be provided in the BE & RE and also make recommendations regarding the financial estimates for paying grant- in- aid to the ISI ;

S.O. 3258. In exercise of the powers conferredby Sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 8 of the Indian Statistical Institute Act . (No.57) of 1959 , the Central Government hereby constitutes a Committee for the period from 1-4-09 to31-3-2011 consisting of:

( ii) ( a) Preparation and submission to the Central Government of statement showing programmes of work ( both Plan & Non - Plan ) agreedto be 7683 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

undertaken by the ISI , Kolkata, during the financial year for which the Central Government may provide funds , as well as general financial estimates of such work;

(b) The settlement on broad lines of the programmes ofwork.

except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession , the Central Government hereby appoints the officermentioned in column ( 1 ) of the TABLE below , being the officer equivalent to the rank ofGazetted Officer of theGovernment , to be the Estate Officer for the purposes of thisAct and also defines the local limits within which and the categories of the public premises , in respect of which , the said Estate Officer shall exercise the powers conferred , and perform the duties imposed , as specified in corresponding entry in column (2) of the said TABLE on such Estate Officer by or under the said Act:

3. The Committee shall submit its mintues to the Government as and when the Committee meets . The Ministry of Statistics and Programine Implementation shall render secretarial assistance to the Committee, the head- quarters ofwhich will be at New Delhi .

TABLE

[No. 1-11011 /1 /2009-Coord] ARVIND KUMAR, Jt. Secy.

Designation of the officer

पर्यटन मंत्रालय

Categories of public pre- mises and local limits of thejurisdiction नई दिल्ली, 24 नवम्बर , 2009

(2)

(1)

General Manager , Lakitha Mahal Palace Hotel ,Mysore Karnataka

All premises belonging to , or taken on lease by, the India Tourism Develop- ment Corporation Limited and situated in the Statc of Karnataka .

No. 6/21 /91 -PSU ( T) }

RAJENDER PRASAD , Assistant DG ( PSU )

संचार एवं सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्रालय

(डाक विभाग)

का.आ 3259.-सरकारी स्थान ( अप्राधिकृत अधिभोगियों की बेदखली ) अधिनियम, 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए दिनांक 20 जून , 2002 को पर्यटन मंत्रालय , भारत सरकार के सं. का.आ. 2212 की अधिसूचना के अधिक्रमण में , ऐसे अधिक्रमण के पूर्व इस संबंध में की गई अथवा हटा दी गई चीजों को छोड़कर , केन्द्र सरकार निम्नलिखित सारणी के कॉलम ( 1 ) में उल्लिखित अधिकारी को, सरकार के राजपत्रित अधिकारी के रैंक के समकक्ष अधिकारी होने के नाते इस अधिनियम के उद्देश्य के लिए सम्पदा अधिकारी के रूप में एतद्द्वारा नियुक्त करती है और यह स्थानीय सीमाएं और सरकारी स्थानों की श्रेणियां निश्चित करती है , जिसके संबंध में उक्त सम्पदा अधिकारी प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करेगा और कर्त्तव्यों का निर्वाह करेगा ।

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर , 2009

सारणी

अधिकारी का पद नाम सरकारी स्थानों की श्रेणियां और क्षेत्राधिकार की स्थानीय सीमाएं

(2)

(1)

का.आ. 3260. राजभाषा नियम ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) , 1976 के नियम 10 के एप नियम ( 4 ) के अनुसरण मेंकेन्द्र सरकार, डाक विभाग के अधीनस्थ कार्यालय मुख्य पोस्टमास्टर जनरल का कार्यालय , कर्नाटक डाक सर्किल , पैलेस रोड , बेगंलूर 560216 को जिनके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारियों ने हिन्टी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है ।

[सं. 11017-1 /2009- रा. भा. ] महाप्रबंधक, ललित महल पैलेस होटल , मैसूर , कर्नाटक

मीरा हाण्डा, उप महानिदेशक ( पी ओ एवं आई/रा. भा. ) भारत पर्यटन विकास निगम का अथवा उनके द्वारा पट्टे पर लिए गए और कर्नाटक राज्यमें स्थित सभी स्थान ।

MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND IT

(Department of Posts)

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2009 [सं. 6/21 /91-पी एस यू( टी ) ] राजेन्द्र प्रसाद , सहायक महानिदेशक ( पी एस यू )

MINISTRY OF TOURISM

New Delhi , the 24th November, 2009

S.O. 3260. In pursuance ofRule 10 ( 4) ofthe Official Language (use for official purposes ofthe Union ) Rule 1976, the Central Government hreby notifies Office of the Chief Postmaster General , Karnataka Postal Circle , Palace Road , Banglore- 560216 ofthe Department of Posts where 80% staff has acquired the working Knowledge ofHindi .

[No. 11017-1 /2009 -OL ]

MEERA HANDA, Dy. Director General ( PO & 1 / OL ) S.O. 3259.- In exercise ofthe powers conferred by Section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of unauthorized occupants ) Act , 1971 (40 of 1971 ) and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry ofTourisrn , number S.O. 2212 , dated the 20th June , 2002 , [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] 7684

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009 /AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्तामामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 12 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3261.--केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स प्राइम टेलेलिक प्रा. लि. , प्लाट नं. एफ 76 ( ए। ) , रोड नं. 5 सी, वी के आई एरिया, जयपुर , राजस्थान द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता (यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " पीटीटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड कानाम " प्राइम " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/421 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) अंकक सूचन सहित है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाशं उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।...

PRIME

आकृति-2 मॉडल का सीलिंग डायग्राम

मशीन के बाटम में चारों कोनों में दिए गए हैड होल स्क्रू में से लीड वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है और लीड सील लगायी गई है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बेर्ट में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 *, 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 232 ) /2009 |

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान

이 7685 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

New Delhi , the 12th November , 2009

S.O. 3261.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority , issatisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Table topType) with digital indication ofhigh accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) of Series " PTT " and with brand name " PRIME " (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ), manufactured by M/ s . Prime Telelink Pvt . Ltd. , Plot No. 5C, V.K.I. Area , Jaipur, Rajasthan and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/421 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table topType ) with digital indication of maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 2 kg . lı has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

Figure1-Model

PRIME

Figure2-Sealing arrangement

The sealing is done by passing a leaded wire through the head hole of the screw at four cornor of bottam of the machine and lead seal is fixed. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card / mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg . and with number verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg . to 50 mg . and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principlc , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. -WM- 21 ( 232 )/ 2009 |

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 7686

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 12 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3262.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स प्राइम टेलेलिक प्रा. लि. , प्लाट नं. एफ 76 (ए1 ) , रोड नं. 5 सी , वी के आई एरिया , जयपुर , राजस्थान द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " पीटीपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " प्राइम " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/ 422 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) अंकक सूचन सहित है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 120 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 500 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 10 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 माडल का सीलिंग डायग्राम

मशीन के बाटम में चारों कोनों में दिए गए हैड होल स्क्रू में से लीड वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है और लीड सील लगाई गई है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 * , 5× 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

| फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (232 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 7687 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14, 1931

New Delhi , the 12th November, 2009

S.O. 3262.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to itby prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976. (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( PlatformType) with digital indication of high accuracy ( Accuracy class - II ) of series " PTP and with brand name " PRIME" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ), manufactured by M /s. Prime Telelink Pvt . Ltd. , Plot No. F - 76 (A1 ) , Road No. 5C , V.K.1 . Area, Jaipur , Rajasthan and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09 /422

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform Typc) with digital indication of maximum capacity of 120 kg and minimum capacity of 500 g. The verification scale interval (e) is 10 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and 50 Hertz alternate current power supply

Figure1-Model

Figure2-Sealing arrangement

The sealing is done by passing a leaded wire through the head hole of the screws at four cornor of bottam of the machine and lead seal is fixed . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card / mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Govemment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 5000 kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of I mg to 50 mg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10% or 5 × 10% , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 232 ) /2009 /

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 7688

[PART JI---SEC. 3 ( ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHΗΛΥΑΝΑ 14, 1931

नई दिल्ली, 13 नवम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 3263.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 3 ) , उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) के तीसरे परन्तुक द्वारा शक्तियों काप्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स कलराज एंड कं. , आर्य कालेज फार बॉयस , सिविल लाइन्स, लुधियाना- पंजाब 141 001 द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग III के " यूनिवर्सलस "श्रृंखला के " प्लास्टिक टेप मैजर " के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " यूनिवर्सल्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/433 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल प्लास्टिक टेप मैजर ( प्लास्टिक फीता माप ) है । जिसकी अधिकतम लम्बाई 50 मीटर है तथा न्यूनतम भाग 2 मिलीमीटर है जिसका उपयोग लम्बाई को मापने के लिए किया जाता है । इसका उपयोग लम्बाई को मापने के लिए किया जाता है जहां कड़े माप की लम्बाई सुविधाजनक या व्यवहारिक न हो ।

आकृति-2 सीलिंग प्रावधान

जैसाकि ऊपर आकृति में दिखाया गया है स्टाम्प का सत्यापन स्टील टेप मैजर के आरंभ में दिया गया है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 241 )/2009| आर माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान

1 7689 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

New Delhi , the 13th November , 2009

S.O. 3263. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures. (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to sub - section (3 ) and sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the " Fabric Tape Measure " , of Accuracy Class III of series " UNIVERSAL'S " with brand naine " UNIVERSAL'S " (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M/s . Kulraj & Co. , Opposite Arya College for Boys , Civil Lines , Ludhiana - Punjab 141 001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/09/433;

The said Model is a Fabric Tape Measure , of maximum length 50m and smallest division is of 1 em which is used for measurement of length . It is used for measurement of length where the use of rigid length measure is not convenient or practicable.

Figure 1 -Model

Figure2-Sealing provision

The verification stamp is given at the beginning of the Fabric Tape Measure , as shown in the figure above .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the steel tape measure of similar make . accuracy and performance of same series in the range of 5m to 100m manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 241 )/2009

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 4233 G1/09--3 7690

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

[PART 11-- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 13 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3264.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) क तासरे परन्तुक द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स कलराज एंड कं. , आर्य कालेज फार बॉयस , सिविल लाइन्स, लुधियाना- पंजाब 141 001 द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग III के " यूनिवर्सलस "श्रृंखला के " फेबरिक टेप मैजर " के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " यूनिवर्सलस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/ 434 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल स्टील टेप मैजर ( फेबरिक फीता माप ) है । जिसकी अधिकतम लम्बाई 50 मीटर है तथा न्यूनतम भाग । मिलीमीटर है जिसका उपयोग लम्बाई को मापने के लिए किया जाता है । इसका उपयोग लम्बाई को मापने के लिए किया जाता है जहां कड़े माप की लम्बाई सुविधाजनक या व्यवहारिक न हो ।

आकृति-2 सीलिंग प्रावधान

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 241 )/2009]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 7691 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

'भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

New Delhi , the 13th November , 2009

S.O. 3264.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to sub - section ( 3 ) and sub- sections ( 7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of the ' Fabric Tape Measure ' , of Accuracy Class III of series ' UNIVERSAL'S ' with Brand name ' UNIVERSAL'S ' (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Kulraj & Co. , Opposite Arya College for Boys , Civil Lines, Ludhiana-Punjab 141 001and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/434;

ThesaidModel is a " Fabric Tape measure " , of maximum length 50m and smallest division is of 2 mm which is used for measurement of length . It is used for measurement of length where the use of rigid length measure is not convenient or practiceable.

Figure1-Model

10000

Figure 2-Sealing provision

The verification stamp is given at the begining of the " Fabric Tape Measure ", as shown in the figure above .

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 241 )/20091

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 7692

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5, 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

[ PART II SEC. 3 (ii) }

नई दिल्ली, 13 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3265.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और मा ५ मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स बेस्ट वन स्केल ट्रेडर्स , 109 सिद्धेश्वर पीठ , आबोली काम्पलैक्स , शॉप नं. 1 , यशोधरा हॉस्पीटल के पास , जेड पी रोड , सोलापुर -413 001 (महाराष्ट्र) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एबीटीटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण (टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ए - बेस्ट वन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/423 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

ARESTONE

A0034

आकृति-2 सीलिंग प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की जाती है । स्केल की बाडी और स्पेशल स्क्रू में दिए गए छेद में लीड सील सहित सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट जोड़ कर स्टाम्पिंग किया जाता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जां 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 5,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. - डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 230 ) /2009 |

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 7693 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

New Delhi , the 13th November , 2009

S.O. 3265.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table topType ) with digital indication of Medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - 111 ) of series " ABTT " and with brand name " A- BEST ONE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Best One Scale Traders , 109 Siddheswar Peth , " ABOLI " Complex shop No. 1 , Nr Yashodhara Hospital , Z.P. Road Solapur - 413001 ( Maharashtra ) which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/423 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table topType ) with a maximum capacity of30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100 g. The verification scale interval ( e ) is 5 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

ARISTONE A8034

Figure 2-Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing shall be done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice. Stamping plate is connected through sealing wire passing from the body of scale and hole provided at the special serew with the lead seal , to get the stamping . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 5,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50 mg . and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the saine principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. - WM - 21 (230)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 7694

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009 /AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) |

नई दिल्ली , 13 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3266.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स बेस्ट वन स्केल ट्रेडर्स , 109 सिद्धेश्वर पीठ , आबोली काम्पलैक्स, शॉप नं. 1 , यशोधरा होस्पीटल के पास , जेड पी.रोड, सोलापुर -413 001 (महाराष्ट्र) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एबीपीएफ " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण (प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ए - बेस्ट वन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/424 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकत्तम क्षमता 500 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत यत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव हैं । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायांड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए मशीन को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की जाती है । स्केल की बॉडी में से लीड सील सहित सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट जोड़ कर स्टाम्पिंग किया जाता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान । × 10 , 2 ×10 , 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

| फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम 21 ( 230 ) /2009 ] आर माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 7695 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,1931

New Delhi , the 13th November, 2009

S.O. 3266. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority. is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " ABPF " and with brand name "A-BEST ONE" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M/s . Best One Scale Traders , 109 Sidheswar Peth , " ABOLI " Complex Shop No. I, Nr Yashodhara Hospital , Z.P. Road Solapur - 413 001 ( Maharashtra) which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/424;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type ) with a maximum capacity of 500 kg . and minimum capacity of 2 kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 100 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply

Figure2--Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing shall be done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . Staming plate is connected through sealing wire passing from the body of scale with the lead seal , to get the stamping. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration ...

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Govemment hereby declares that this certificate ofapproval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg . up to 5000kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (230 )/ 2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 7696

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 13 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3267.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स नाहर एंड सेठ इंड. एस्टेट , एल.बी.एस. मार्ग , पन्नालाल सिल्क कम्पाउंड , भांडुप ( वे ) महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 11 ) वाले " यूएलएम " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " यूएलटीआरए " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 09/ 435 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) सहित है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 600 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 500 मि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 10 मि.ग्रा. है। इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकंलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । तरल कण प्रदर्शक ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

ULTRA

आकृति-2 सीलिंग प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों से वेइंग मशीन को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की जाती है । स्टम्पिंग के लिए स्टाम्प प्लेट को स्केल की बाडी और स्पेशल स्क्रू में दिए गए छेद में से लीड सील के साथ सीलिंग वायर निकालकर जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्त्रिच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 60,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 60,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 , 5× 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (240 )/2009]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 7697 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

New Delhi , the 13th November , 2009

S.O. 3267. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority . is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) of series " ULM " and with brand name " ULTRA " (hereinafter referred to as the said Model) , manufactured by M /s . Ultra Instruments , 142-13, Nahar & Sheth Ind . Estate, L.B.S. Marg , Pannalal Silk Compound , Bhandup ( W) Maharashtra -400 078 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/435;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 600 g. and minimum capacity of 500 mg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 10 mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure2- Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing shall be done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . Stamping plate is connected through sealing wire passing from the body of scale and hole provided at the special screw with the lead seal , to get the stamping . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracyandperformance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg. and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 60,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg. to 50 mg . and with number of verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 5000 to 60,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10 % or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative wholenumber or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 (240)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4233 G1/09-4 7698

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHALANA 14 , 1931

[PART II--SEC . 3( ii) )

नई दिल्ली, 13 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3268.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स नाहर एंड सेठ इंड. एस्टेट, एल.बी.एस. मार्ग , पन्नालाल सिल्क कम्पाउंड , भांडुप ( वे ) महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " यूएलटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " यूएलटीआरए " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 09/436 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) सहित है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 2.30 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

ULTRA

A2244

आकृति-2 सीलिंग प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों से वेइंग मशीन को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की जाती है । स्टम्पिंग के लिए स्टम्प प्लेट को स्केल की बाडी और स्पेशल स्क्रू में दिए गए छेद में से लीड सील के साथ सीलिंग वायर निकालकर जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 500 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के , 2 × 10 के, 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

| फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम 21 ( 240 )/2009|

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 7699 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

New Delhi , the 13th November, 2009

S.O. 3268. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report subrnitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likelyto maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table topType) with digital indication of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " ULT " and with brand name "ULTRA " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model) , manufactured by M/s . Ultra Instruments , 142-13 , Nahar & Sheth Ind. Estate, L.B.S. Marg , Pannalal Silk Compound, Bhandup ( W) ( Maharashtra ) 400078 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/436;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table topType ) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100 g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 5 g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing results. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

ULTRA

A7944 Figure2---Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing shall be done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . Stamping plate is connected through sealing wire passing from the body of seale and hole provided at the special screw with the lead seal , to get the stamping . A typical schematic diagram of scaling provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card /mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg. and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the . range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg . to 50 mg. and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10 or 5-10 % , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the samc materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM-21 (240) 2009

R. MATHURBOOTIAM , Director of Legal Metrology 7700

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

नई दिल्ली , 13 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3269.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स नाहर एंड सेठ इंड. एस्टेट , एल.बी.एस. मार्ग , पन्नालाल सिल्क कम्पाउंड, भांडुप ( वे ) महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यर्थाथता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " यूएलपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " यूएलटीआरए " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09 /437 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

A7943

आकृति-2 माडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों से वेइंग मशीन को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की जाती है । स्टाम्पिंग के लिए स्टाम्प प्लेट को स्केल की बाडो और स्पेशल स्क्रू में दिए गए छेद में से लीड सील के साथ सीलिंग वायर निकालकर जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केंन्द्रीय सस्कार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तांलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक कीं अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

| फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम 21 ( 240 ) /2009 |

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

77001

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931 .

New Delhi , the 13th November , 2009

S.O. 3269.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non -automatic weighing instrument( Platform type) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series "ULP " and with brand name " ULTRA " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Ultra Instruments , 142 - B , Nahar & Sheth Ind. Estate , L.B.S. Marg , Pannalal Silk Compound , Bhandup ( W) Maharashtra 400078 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/437;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg and minimum capacity of 2 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

FigureI-Model

A7943 Figure 2Sealing provision of the Indicator of the model

Sealing shallbe done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . Stamping plate is connected through sealing wire passing from the body ofscale with the lead seal , to get the stamping. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Govemment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg up to 5000 kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10% , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 240)/2009 |

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 7702

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

PARTII SEC . 3 ( ii ) |

नई दिल्ली , 16 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3270.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स गिहोन वेइंग स्केल्स , डी-286 , टैगोर गार्डन एक्सटेंशन , नई दिल्ली-110027 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग !!! ) वाले " जीडब्ल्यूपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " गिहोन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/428 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मशीन की बॉडी पर दिए गए छेदों में से लीडिड वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है और लीड सील लगाई जाती है । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 500 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 *, 5 ×10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 236 ) /2009 ]

आर माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7703

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

New Delhi , the 16th November , 2009

S.O. 3270.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority. issatisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) of series " GWP " and with brand name " GIHON " (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ), manufacturedby M / s . Gihon Weighing Scales, 1D - 286 , Tagore GardenExtension , New Delhi - 110027 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/09/428:

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with digital indication of maximum capacity of 1000kg and minimum capacity of 2 kg . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 100g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure2-Sealing provision of the Indicator of the model

The Sealing is done by passing a leaded wire through the holes of the body of indicator and lead seal is fixed . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card / mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg up to 5000 kg with verification scale interval (n) inthe range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10 % , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle . design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 (236 )/ 2009 |

R. MATHURBOOTIAM , Director of Legal Metrology 7704

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii ) } THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3271.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि. उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स गिहोन वेइंग स्केल्स , डी-286 , टैगोर गार्डन एक्सटेंशन , नई दिल्ली-110027 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " जीडब्ल्यूटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " गिहोन " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/429 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 के , 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

| फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 236 ) /2009|

आर माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7705

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

New Delhi , the 16th November, 2009

S.O. 3271. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of High accuracy ( Accuracy class - 11 ) of series " GWT " and with brand name " GIHON " (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Gihon Weighing Scales . D - 286 , Tagorc GardenExtension, New Delhi - 110027 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /09/429;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with digital indication of maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100 g. The verification scale interval ( c) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply .

max-30kg min- 100g e - 2g, class -Il

Figure2 Sealing arrangement

The Sealing is done by passing a leaded wire through the holes on the body of the machine and lead seal is fixed . Atypical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card / mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg . to 50mg. and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10¹ , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 (236 )/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 4233 G1/09-5 7706

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3272,-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स पोलाइट वेइंग सोल्यूसंज , प्लाट नं. ई-105 , एमआईडीसी , अमबाद , नासिक -422010 ( महाराष्ट्र ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " पीओटीटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " पोलाइट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/431 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्ाकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

POLITE

A7935

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड, मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 5,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे आआंधक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 के, 2× 10 के, 5 × 10 कं , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 234 )/2009 |

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान

小

HH [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

7707

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

New Delhi , the 16th November , 2009

S.O. 3272.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority . is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) of series " POTT " and with brand name " POLITE" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Modei ) , manufactured by M/s . Polite Weighing Solutions . Plot No. E - 105 , M.I.D.C. Ambad , Nashik -422010 ( Maharashtra) which is assigned the approval mark INID /09/09/431;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top typc) with amaximum capacity of 30kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternale current power supply.

POLITE

A7935

Figure-2Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing shall be done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practicc . Stamping plate is connected through sealing wire passing from the body of scale and hole provided at the special screw with the lead seal , to get the stamping. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 5000 for ' e ' value of Img.. to 50mg . and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 ( 234)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 7708

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )|

नई दिल्ली , 16 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3273.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स पोलाइट वेइंग सोल्यूसंज प्लाट नं. ई-105 , एमआईडीसी , अमबाद , नासिक -422 010 ( महाराष्ट्र) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " पीओटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " पोलाइट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/430 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता .30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

POL

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो ! मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 के , 5× 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 234) /2009 ]

आर माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7709

भारत का. राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14, 1931

New Delhi , the 16th November , 2009

S.O. 3273.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of High Accuracy (Accuracy class - 11 ) of series " POT " and with brand name " POLITE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ), manufactured by M/ s . Polite Weighing Solutions Plot No. E - 105 , M.I.D.C. Ambad, Nashik -422010 ( Maharashtra) which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /09/430;

Thesaid model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with amaximum capacity of 30kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

POLITE

A6903 Figure-2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing shall be done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . Stamping plate is connected through sealing wire passing from the body of scale and hole provided at the special screw with the lead scal, to get the stamping . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card / mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Govemment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 5000 for ' e ' value of Img . to 50mg . and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with 'e ' value 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturers in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (234 )/2009 /

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of legal Metrology 7710

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5, 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

नई दिल्ली , 16 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3274.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स पोलाइट वेइंग सोल्यूसंज प्लाट नं. ई -105 , एमआईडीसी, अमबाद, नासिक-422010 ( महाराष्ट्र ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " पीओपीएफ " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " पोलाइट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/432 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

A6904

कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों से वेइंग मशीन को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की जाती है । स्टम्पिंग के लिए स्टाम्प प्लेट को स्केल की बाडी में से लीड सील के साथ सीलिंग वायर निकालकर जोड़ा गया है । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी कलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. से या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 *, 5× 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्यहैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21.( 234)/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

7711

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14, 1931

New Delhi , the 16th November , 2009

S.O. 3274.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and ( 8 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) of series " POPF" and with brand name "POLITE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Polite Weighing Solutions, Plot No. E - 105 , M.J.D.C. Ambad , Nashik -422010 ( Maharashtra) which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /09/432;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg and minimum capacity of 2 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

A6904

Figure-2 Sealing provision of the indicator of model

Sealing shall be done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . Stamping plate is connected through sealing wire passing from the body of scale with the lead seal , to get the stamping . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in . A/ D card /mother board 10 disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 Kg up to 5000 Kg with vcrification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. of more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2x10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 234)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 7712

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) |

नई दिल्ली , 16 नवम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 3275.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा (8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स पोलाइट वेइंग सोल्यूसंज प्लाट नं. ई-105 , एमआईडीसी , अमबाद , नासिक-422010 ( महाराष्ट्र) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " पीओडब्ल्यू" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक वेब्रिज ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " पोलाइट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 09/ 433 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक वेब्रिज ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 10 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

POLITE

स्केल की पिछली प्लेट में किए गए छेद में सीलिंग की जाती है , तब इन छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाली जाती है । कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों से वेइंग मशीन को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनांबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. से या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 200 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमती वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 के, 5× 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 234 )/2009 |

आर माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान

11 7713 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

New Delhi , the 16th November , 2009

S.O. 3275. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the CentralGovernment hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval ofthe model ofnon - automatic weighing instrument (Electronic Weighbridge) with digital indication of Medium accuracy (Accuracy class - 111 ) of series " POW " and with brand name "POLITE" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/s . Polite Weighing Solutions Plot No. F- 105 , M.I.D.C. Ambad, Nashik-422010 ( Maharashtra) which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/433;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Weighbridge ) with a maximum capacity of 60 tonne and minimum capacity of 200 kg . The verification scale interval ( c ) is 10 kg. It has a - tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

POLITE

Figure-2 Sealing provision ofthe indicator of the model

The sealing is done through the hole made in rear plate of the scale , than sealing wire is passed through these holes . Sealing shall be done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 5 tonne and up to 200 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g . or above and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacture in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 ( 234)/20091

R. MATHURBOOTIIAM, Director of Legal Metrology 4233 G1/09-6 7714

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )]

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली , 13 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3276.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं, वे स्थापित हो गए है :-

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या

क्रम

सं. वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों , यदि कोई हो, की संख्या और वर्ष

(2)

(3)

(1)

(4)

31-03-2009 आई एस /आई ई सी 60127-1: 2006 लघु फ्यूज- भाग । लघु फ्यूजों की परिभाषा और लघु फ्यूज- लिंक की सामान्य अपेक्षाएं ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

30-06-2009 2. आई एस / आई ई सी 60127-2: 2003 लघु फ्यूज- भाग 2 कार्टिज फ्यूज- लिंक ( पहला पुनरीक्षण )

31-03-2009 3. आई एस / आई ई सी 60127-4: 2005 लघु फ्यूज- भाग 4 यूनिवर्सल मॉड्यूलर फ्यूज- लिंक ( यूएमएफ ) थू- होल और सतह पर मांउट टाइप

इस भारतीय मानक की एक प्रति भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : ईटी 39/टी -18 , टी -19 एवं टी-25 ] आर. के. त्रेहन , वैज्ञानिक ई एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी )

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

New Delhi , the 13th November , 2009

S.O. 3276.- In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Ruie 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hercto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Date of Established Sl .No. No. and Year of the Indian Standards

No. & Year of the Indian Standards , if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(4)

(3)

(1)

(2)

31 March , 2009

1 IS/ IEC 60127-1 : 2006 Miniature Fuses Part 1 Definitions for miniature fuses and general requirements for miniature fuse- links ( First Revision)

30June , 2009

2 IS /IEC 60127-2 : 2003 Miniature Fuses Part 2 Cartridge fuse - links (FirstRevision) 7715 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

3 IS/ IEC 60127-4 : 2005 Miniature Fuses

31 March , 2009

Part 4 Universal Modular fuses - links

(UMF) - through -hole and surface mount types

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: ET39-18 , T - 19 & T -25 ]

R. K. TREHAN ,, Scientist E & Head ( Electro technical )

नई दिल्ली , 17 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3277.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 9 के उप नियम ( 1 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए भारतीय मानक/मानकों सम्बंधी मानक मुहर के डिजाइन अधिसूचित करता है: -

अनुसूची

क्रम सं.

उत्पाद की श्रेणी

मानक मुहर का डिजाइन

लागूहोने की तिथि

भारतीय मानककी सं. और वर्ष

IS15652

01-11-2007

आई एस

इन्सुलेटिड मैटस

15652:2006

फॉर इलैक्ट्रिकल

पर्पसज स्विचसॉकेट आउटलेटस

[संदर्भ : सीएमडी-1/ 13 :91

पी. के. गम्भीर, उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर )

New Delhi , the 17th November , 2009

S.O. 3277.-In pursuance of sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 9 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987, the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the Standard Mark ( s ) for the Indian Standards given in the schedule : ---

SCHEDULE

Sl . No.

Product/Class of

Effective date Design ofthe Standard Mark

No. & Year of the Indian Standards

product

01-11-2007

IS I 5652: 2006

IS 15652 ISI

Insulating mates for

electrical purposes

[Ref: CMD- 1 / 13 : 9|

P. K. GAMBIER, Dy. Director General (Marks )

नई दिल्ली , 18 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3278.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के नियम 6 के उप नियम ( 3 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए उत्पादों की मुहरांकान शुल्क अधिसूचित करता है :-

7716

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5, 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

अनुसूची

भाग आ. वर्ष

भारतीय

उत्पाद

इकाई

स्लैब 2 में

इकाई

इकाई न्यूनतम मुहरांकन शुल्क

स्लैब 1 में

इकाई दर शेष

प्रचालन तिथि

इकाइयां

मानक

बड़े पैमाने छोटे पैमाने

पर

इकाइयां

सं.

स्लैब2 दर

दर स्लैब ।

0.50

1997

25.8.09 144831

37800.00

उर्वरक एवं रासायनिक 1 पीस 44400.00 अन्तःक्षेपण पद्धति

भाग । वेन्चुरीअन्तःक्षेपक

[सं.: कें प्र वि/13: 10]

पी. के. गम्भीर, उप महानिदेशक ( मुहर )

New Delhi , the 18th November , 2009

S.O. 3278.-In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 3 ) of regulation 6 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulations 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the Marking fee for the products given in the schedule :

SCHEDULE

Rema- Product

Part Sec Year

Units Minimum MarkingFee

IS No.

ining

Small Scale

Effect- tive Date

Unit Rate Slab - 1

Unit in Slab - 1

Unit Rate Slab -2

Unit in Slab -2

Large Scale

37800.00 0.50

25-08-09 14483 1

1997

IPc . 44400.00

Fertilizer and Chemical Injector System Part 1 Ventury Injector

[No. CMD/ 13 : 10 ]

P. K. GAMBHIR , Dy. Director General ( Marks)

नई दिल्ली , 19 नवम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 3279.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्थापित हो गए है: -

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि क्रम स्थापित भारतीय मानक( कों ) की संख्या

सं. वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(3)

(1) (2)

30-06-2009 आई एस 15880: 2009 आई जी बी टी कन्वर्टर से बिजली की आपूर्ति वाले तीन फेज की केज प्रेरण मोटर अनुप्रयोग की मार्गदर्शिका

30-06 2009 2. आई एस 15881 : 2009 आई जी बी टी कन्वर्टर आपूर्ति के लिए विशेष रूप से डिजाइन की गई तीन फेजी केज प्रेरण मोटर -विशिष्टि

इस भारतीय मानक की एक प्रति भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली 110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर, कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : ईटी 15/टी -89 , टी -90 ]

आर. के. त्रेहन , वैज्ञानिक-ई एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी )

HH [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

7717

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

New Delhi , the 19th November , 2009

S.O. 3279.-In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 ofthe Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the indicated against each:

SCHEDULE

Sl.No.

Date of Establishment No. and Year ofthe Indian Standards

No. & Year of the Indian Standards , if any, Súperseded by the New Indian Standard

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

30June,2009 1 IS 15880 : 2009 Three Phase Cage Induction Motors when Fed from IGBT Converters Application Guide

30June, 2009 2 IS 15881 : 2009 Three Phase Cage Induction Motors Specifically Designed for IGBT Converters Supply- Specification

Copy ofthis Standard is available with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar, Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune, Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: ET15/ 1-89,1-901

R. K. TREHAN ,, Scientist E & Head ( Electro technical )

कोयला मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 26 नवम्बर, 2009

'का.आ. 3280.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय द्वारा जारी की गई अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ.1707 , तारीख 8 जून , 2009 जो भारत के राजपत्र के भाग- II , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) , तारीख 20 जून , 2009 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका माप 865.00 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 2137.413 एकड़ ( लगभग ) है,कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची ( अनुसूचियों ) में विनिर्दिष्ट उक्त भूमियों के भाग में कोयला अभिप्राप्त है ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम , 1957 की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 752.456 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 1859.31 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप की उक्त भूमियों में या उस पर के सभी अधिकारों का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ;

टिप्पण 1 : इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आनेवाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. एसईसीएल/बीएसपी /जीएम ( पीएलजी )/लैंड/ 358 तारीख 14 सितम्बर, 2009 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर , कोरबा ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 , काउंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता-700001 के कार्यालय में या साऊथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व अनुभाग ) , सीपत रोड, बिलासपुर- 495006 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

टिप्पण 2 : उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है , जिसमें निम्नलिखित उपबंध है । 7718

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3(ii )] अर्जन की बाबत आपत्ति : -

" 8 ( 1 ) कोई व्यक्ति जो किसी भूमि में जिसकी बाबत धारा 7 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचना निकाली गई है , हितबद्ध है , अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्हीं अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के बारे में आपत्ति कर सकेगा ।

स्पष्टीकरण: -

( 1 ) इस धारा के अन्तर्गत यह आपत्ति नहीं मानी जाएगी कि कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन संक्रियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संक्रियाएं केन्द्रीय सरकार या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नहीं करना चाहिए ।

(2) उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन प्रत्येक आपत्ति सक्षम प्राधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जाएंगी और सक्षम प्राधिकारी , आपत्तिकर्ता को स्वयं सुने जाने , विधि व्यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपत्तियों को सुनने के पश्चात् और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जांच , यदि कोई हो, करने के पश्चात् जो वह आवश्यक समझता है , वह या तो धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि का या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़ों या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आपत्तियों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार को उसके विनिश्चय के लिए देगा ।

(3 ) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबद्ध समझा जाएगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होगा , यदि भूमि या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर लिए जाने देगा " ।

टिप्पण 3 : केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकता 700001 को उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 के अधीन अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 905 , तारीख 20 मार्च 1987 द्वारा जो भारत के राजपत्र , भाग II , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) , तारीख 4अप्रैल, 1987 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियुक्त किया है ।

अनुसूची

जटराज ब्लाक दूसरा विस्तार, कुसमुण्डा क्षेत्र

जिला-कोरबा ( छत्तीसगढ़ )

(रेखांक सं. एसईसीएल/बीएसपी/जीएम ( पीएलजी ) /लैंड/358 तारीख 14 सितम्बर, 2009 )

सभी अधिकार :

(क) राजस्व भूमि:

टिप्पण

ग्राम संख्या तहसील

जिला

क्षेत्र हेक्टर में

क्रम सं

ग्राम का नाम

पटवारी हल्कासंख्या

367

कोरबा

कटघोरा

139.793

रिस्दी

संपूर्ण

242.873

कोरबा

364

पडनिया

कटघोरा

संपूर्ण 36

365

कोरबा

131.565

पाली

कटघोरा

संपूर्ण

भाग

369

कोरबा

25.515

कटघोरा

जट्राज (अनसर्वेड)

भाग

368

172.166

कटघोरा कोरबा

सोनपुरी

कुल क्षेत्रफल:- 711.912 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 1759.13 एकड़ ( लगभग )

H [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र :दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

(ख ) राजस्व वन भूमि: -

पटवारी ग्राम संख्या

क्रम सं.

ग्राम का नाम

हल्का संख्या- 1.

रिस्दी

367 2.

पडनिया

364 3.

पाली

365 4.

369 जट्राज( अनसर्वेड)

368 सोनपुरी

1 . ग्राम रिस्दी ( संपूर्ण ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांक : 1 से 585

2. ग्राम पडनिया ( संपूर्ण ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांक 1 से 968

3. ग्राम पाली ( संपूर्ण ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांक 1 से 502

7719 तहसील

जिला

टिप्पण

क्षेत्र हेक्टर में

कटघोरा कोरबा

18.518 संपूर्ण कटघोरा कोरबा

0.052

संपूर्ण कटघोरा

कोरबा

0.194 संपूर्ण कटघोरा

कोरबा

0.000

भाग कटघोरा

कोरबा

21.780

भाग

कुल क्षेत्रफल:-40.544 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 100.18 एकड़ ( लगभग )

कुल योग (क+ ख): 752.456 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 1859.31 एकड़ ( लगभग ) 4. ग्राम जट्राज ( अनसर्वेड ) ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यां 31 ( भाग ) , 60 ( भाग ) , 61 से 63 , 65 से 67, 90 से 92 , 95 (भाग ) , 97 , 101 , 102 , 104 , 106 , 108 , 109 , 111 , 115 , 116 , से 118 , 123 ( भाग ) , 127 , 128 , 135 ( भाग ) , 139 से 142, 144, 145, 146 ( भाग ) , 147 से 150,152 से 159, 161 से 165, 168 से 182, 183 ( भाग ) , 184 से 186 , 188 , 189 , 190 ( भाग ) , 191 , 192 (भाग ) , 231 ( भाग ) , 234, 235 , 242 , 244, 245 , 247 , 250 से 255, 257 , 259 से 263 ।

5. ग्राम सोनपुरी ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यां से 322 , 323 ( भाग ) , 324 , 325 ( भाग ) , 326, 327 , 328 ( भाग ) , 336( भाग ) , 337 से 416, 417 ( भाग ) , 418 से 420 , 421 ( भाग ) , 446 ( भाग ) , 447 से 660 ।

सीमा वर्णन:

क-ख रेखा बिन्दु " क " से आरंभ होती है और ग्राम रिस्दी- दुरपा , पाली- बरकुटा के सम्मिलित सीमा से गुजरती हुई ग्राम जद्राज - बरकुटा के सम्मिलित सीमा में बिन्दु " ख " पर मिलती है ।

रेखा ग्राम जट्राज से गुजरती हुई ग्राम जट्राज सोनपुरी के सम्मिलित सीमा में बिन्दु " ग " पर मिलती है । ख-ग

ग-घ रेखा ग्राम सोनपुरी के प्लाट संख्याक 328 , 325 , 323 , 336 से होकर प्लाट संख्यांक 416 के उत्तरी सीमा और 417 से गुजर कर प्लाट संख्यांक 419 के उत्तरी सीमा तथा 421 से गुजरती है उसके बाद प्लाट संख्यांक 447 के उत्तरी सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु" घ " पर मिलती है ।

घड. रेखा ग्राम सोनपुरी के पूर्वी , दक्षिणी तथा पश्चिमी सीमा से गुजरती हुई ग्राम खैरभावना-सोनपुरी- पडनिया के सम्मिलित सीमा में बिन्दु " ड " पर मिलती है ।

ड.च रेखा ग्राम खैरभावना - पडनिया, कनबेरी- पडनिया , जपेली पडनिया के सम्मिलित सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " च " पर मिलती है ।

चक रेखा ग्राम जपेली- रिस्दी, आमगांव - रिस्दी , गेवरा रिस्दी के सम्मिलित सीमा से होती हुई आरंभिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है ।

MINISTRY OF COAL

[फा.सं. -43015/12/2009-पीआरआईडब्ल्यू- ।। एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 26th November , 2009

S.O. 3280.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry ofCoal numher S. O. 1707 dated the 8th June, 2009 issued under sub - section I of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisition and Development ) 7720

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

[PART II -SLEC . 3 (ii) | Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) , (hereinafter referrred to as the said Act ), and published in the Gazette of India , Part - II , Section 3 , Sub- section ( ii ) , dated the 20th June , 2009 the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 865.00 hectares (approximately ) or 2137.413 acres (approximately ) ofthe lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to thatnotification ;

Andwhereas the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands specified in the Schedule (s) appended to this notification;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the lands measuring 752.456 hectares ( approximately ) or 1859.31 acres(approximately) as ' All rights ' in or over the said lands described in the Schedule appended hcreto;

Note 1 : The planbearing Number : SECL/BSP /GM (Plg ) / Land /358 dated 14th September , 2009 ofthe arca covered bythis notification may be inspected the office of the Collector , Korba (Chhattisgarh ) or at the office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata -700001 or at the office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited (Revenue Section ) , Seepat Road , Bilaspur- 495006 ( Chhattisgarh).

Note 2 : Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of Section 8 of the said Act which provides as follows : - Objection to Acquisition :

" 8 ( 1 ) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 has been issued, may within thirty days of the issue of the notification , object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or any rights in or over such land.

Explanation:--

(1 ) It shall not be an objection within the meaning ofthis section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operation in the land for the production of coal and that such operation should not be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person .

(2) Every objection under sub - section ( 1 ) shall be made to the competent authority in writing, and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall , after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry, if any, as he thinks necessary, cither makes a report in respect ofthe land which has been notified under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 7 or of rights in or over such land, or make different reports in respect of different parcels ofsuch land or of rights in or over such land , to the Central Government , containing his recommmendations on the objections , together with the record of the proceedings held by him, for the decision of the Government.

(3) For the purposes of this section , a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act . " Note 3 : The Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street, Kolkata , 700001 , has been appointed by the Central Government as the competent authority under section 3 of the said Act , vide notification number S.O. 905 ,dated the 20th March , 1987, published in Part II , Section 3 , Sub -section ( ii ) of the Gazette of India, dated the 4thApril 1987.

SCHEDULE

Jatraj Block 2nd Extension , Kusmunda Area District- Korba ( Chhattisgarh)

[Plan No. SECL /BSP /GM ( Plg )/ Land /358 dated 14th September , 2009 ]

All Rights:

(A) Revenue Land

Remarks

District

Tahsil

Area in Hectares

Village number

Sl . No.

Name of Village

Patwari Halka number

(8)

(7)

(1) (2)

(3)

(6)

(4)

(5)

1. Risdi

367

139.793 Full

korba

Katghora

364

Padanja

korba

242.873 Full

Katghora

41 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7721

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14, 1931

(1) (2)

(3)

(4) 3. Pali

365 4.

369 Jatraj (Unsurveyed) 36

368 Sompuri

(6)

(7)

(8 ) (5)

131.565 Full korba

Katghora

korba

25.515 Part Katghora

korba

172.166 Part Katghora

Total: - 711.912 hectares (approximately) or 1759.13 Acrcs ( approximately)

(B) REVENUE FOREST LAND

SI . No.

Village number Name of Village

Patawari Halka number

1. Risdi

367 2.

Padania

364 3. Pali

365 4.

369 Tahsil

Remarks

Area in

District Hectares

Korba

18.518 Full Katghora

Korba

0.052

Full Katghora

Korba

0.094

Full Katghora

Part

0.000

Katghora Korba

Jatraj (Unsurveyed) 36

368 Sonpuri

Korba

21.780 Part Katghora

Total: -40.544 hectares (approximately) or 100.18 Acres ( approximately)

1. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Risdi ( Full ) : 1 to585.

2. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Padania (Full) : 1 to 968.

3. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Pali ( Full) : 1 to 502 .

Grand Total (A+ B) : -752.456 Hectares ( approximately)

or 1859.31 Acres ( approximately).

4. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Jatraj (Unsurveyed ) ( Part ) : 31 (Part), 60 ( Part ), 61 to 63 , 65 to 67 , 90 to 92 , 95 (Part ) , 97 , 101 , 102 , 104 , 106 , 108 , 109 , 111 , 115 , 116 , tol 18 , 123 ( Part) , 127 , 128 , 135 ( Part) , 139 to 142, 144 , 145, 146 (Part), 147 to 150,152 to 159, 161 to 165, 168 to 182 , 183 (Part ) , 184 to 186 , 188 , 189 , 190 (Part ) , 191 , 192 (Part) , 231 ( Part) , 234 , 235 , 242 , 244, 245, 247, 250 to 255 , 257 , 259 to 263.

5. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Sonpuri ( Part) : 1 to 322, 323 ( Part ) , 324 , 325 ( Part) , 326 , 327 , 328 ( Part ) , 336(Part) , 337 to 416 , 417 ( Part) , 418 to 420 , 421 ( Part) , 446 ( Part) , 447 to 660 .

BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION :

A-B

Linestarts from point ' A' and passes along the common boundary of villages Risdi - Durpa, Pali - Barkuta and meets at point " B " on the common boundary of villages Jatraj - Barkuta .

B-C

Line passes through village Jatraj and meets at point ' C ' on the common boundary of villages Sonpuri- Jatraj.

C-D Line passes in village Sonpuri through plot numbers 328, 325 , 323 , 336 , northrn boundary of plot no. 416, through 417 , northern boundary ofplot no . 419 , through 421 , northern boundary of plot no . 447 and meets at point "D" .

Line passes along eastern , southern and western village boundary of village Sonpuri and meets at point 'E' on the commmon boundary of villages Sonpuri -Khairbhauna - Padania.

E-F Line passes along the common boundary of village Padania - Khairbhauna , Kanberi -Padania , Padania- Japeli and meets at point ' F' .

F-A Line passes along the common boundary of villages Risdi - Japeli , Risdi -Amgaon , Risdi -Gevra and meets at starting point "A" .

4233 G1/09-7

[No.43015/12/2009 - PRIW - 1 ] M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy .

7722

[PART I-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5, 2009 /AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

नई दिल्ली , 27 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3281.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 7 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्यांक का. आ. 1563 तारीख 3 जून , 2009 द्वारा जो भारत सरकार के राजपत्र, भाग II , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) तारीख 6 जून , 2009 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर सभी अधिकारों को अर्जन करने के लिए अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी ;

और , सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी शोर्ट दे दी है ;

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार का, पूर्वोक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और छत्तीसगढ़ सरकार से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 2094.89 हेक्टेयर ( लगभग ) या 5174.3783 एकड़ (लगभग ) मापवाली भूमि अर्जित की जानी चाहिए ;

अतः , अब , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 9 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , घोषणा करती है कि अनुसूची में पथावर्णित 2094.89 हेक्टेयर ( लगभग ) या 5174.3783 एकड़ ( लगभग ) मापवाली भूमि और ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के सभी अधिकार अर्जित किये जाते हैं ।

इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाले सम्पूर्ण क्षेत्र के रेखांक संख्या एनटीपीसी/टीसीएमपी /एसईसी 9 ( 1 )/ तलईपल्ली /09/ 01 तारीख 1-8-2009 का निरीक्षण जिला कलेक्टर , जिला रायगढ़ , छत्तीसगढ के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , । काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट कोलकाता 700 001 के कार्यालय में, या अपर महाप्रबन्धक ( प्रभारी ) , तलईपल्ली कोल माइनिंग प्रोजेक्ट, एनटीपीसी लिमिटेड, 56 , गजानन्दपुरम नगर , कटरा थाना रोड, रायगढ़ , छत्तीसगढ़ -496 001 के कार्यालय में या उप- महाप्रबन्धक ( सीएम- सिविल ) , एनटीपीसी लिमिटेड , प्रथम तल , पी.डी. आई. एल. बिल्डिंग , सैक्टर -1 , नोएडा, उत्तर प्रदेश -201301 के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

अनुसूची

तलईपल्ली कोल माईनिंग ब्लाक जिला रायगढ़ , छत्तीसगढ़ रेखांक सं.: एनटीपीसी/टीसीएमपी /एसईसी 9 ( 1 )/ तलईपल्ली /09/01 तारीख 1-8-2009

सभी अधिकार

( क ) राजस्व भूमि

टिप्पणियां

जिला

थाना सं.

क्र.सं. ग्राम का नाम

थाना

क्षेत्रफल (लगभग) हेक्टेयर

एकड़

20.87

भाग 1.

51.5489

रायगढ़

अजीजगढ़

घरघोड़ा

319.88

790.1036 भाग

रायगढ़

घरघोड़ा

छोटीगुढ़ा

भाग सालेहपली

36.93

91.2171

घरघोड़ा रायगढ़

600.83

रायकेरा

1484.0501 भाग घरघोड़ा रायगढ़

325.9165 भाग 5.

131.95

रायगढ़

घरघोड़ा

नयारामपुर

360.22

889.7434 भाग 6.

बिछीनारा

घरघोड़ा रायगढ़

तनमार

295.13

तलईपल्ली

रायगढ़

728.9711 पूर्ण 8.

121.65

300.4755 भाग

रायगढ़

लेइलुन्गा

कुदुरमहुआ

1887.46

4662.0262

कुल क्षेत्र [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(ख) वन भूमि

क्र. सं. ग्राम का नाम

थाना

जिला 1.

अजीजगढ़

रायगढ़

घरघोड़ा

छोटीगुढ़ा

घरघोड़ा रायगढ़ 3.

बिछीनारा

घरघोड़ा रायगढ़ 4.

तलईपल्ली

तनमार

रायगढ़ 5.

रायगढ़ कुदुरमहुआ

लेइलुन्गा

कुल क्षेत्र

सारांश :

(क) कुल राजस्व भूमिः

7723

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या क्षेत्रफल (लगभग)-

टिप्पणियां हेक्टेयर

एकड़

531 ( भाग)

2.23

भाग

5.5081

46.9300

19.00

543( पूर्ण)

पूर्ण 536 (भाग)

भाग 56.50

139.5550

542(पूर्ण)

पूर्ण पूर्ण 543(पूर्ण)

539(पूर्ण)

पूर्ण 111.20

274.6640 पूर्ण 541 (पूर्ण)

540( पूर्ण)

पूर्ण 535 ( भाग)

भाग 538 (पूर्ण)

पूर्ण 18.50

45.6950

भाग 537 (भाग)

207.43

512.3521

1887.46 हेक्टेयर ( लगभग)

(ख) कुल वन भूमिः

=4662.0262 एकड़ ( लगभग)

207.43 हेक्टेयर ( लगभग)

सकल योग ( क+ख):

(ग)

= 512.3521 एकड़ ( लगभग )

2094.89 हेक्टेयर ( लगभग )

= 5174.3783 एकड़ ( लगभग )

धारा 9 ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित किये जाने वाले राजस्व प्लाटों की सूची:

1. ग्राम अजीजगढ़ : 25( भाग) , 26( भाग ) , 27( भाग ) , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ( भाग ) । 2. ग्राम छोटीगुढ़ा : 50, 52/1 , 53 , 54 , 55/1 , 55/2 , 56 , 57 , 58/1 , 58/2 , 58/3 , 58/4 , 58/5 , 59 , 60 , 61/1 , 61/2 , 62 , 63/1 , 63/2, 63/3 , 64 , 65, 66( भाग) , 70, 71 ,76 , 83 , 84( भाग) , 85 , 86/1 ( भाग ) , 86/2, 86/3 , 88 , 89 , 202 ( भाग ) , 212 , 213/1 , 213/2 , 214 से 224 , 225 ( भाग ) , 226 ( भाग ) , 227 ( भाग ) , 228 से 232 , 238 , 239 ( भाग ) , 240/1 , 240/2, 241 से 244, 245/1 , 245/2 ; 245/3 , 246 , 247, 248/1 , 248/2 , 249 से 258 , 259/1 , 259/2, 260 , 261 , 262 से 270 , 271/1 से 271/8 , 272 से 278 , 279/1 से 279/3 , 280/1 से 280/3 , 281 से 293 , 294/1 , 294/2 से 294/3 , 294/4( भाग) , 294/7 से 294/10 , 294/11 ( भाग) , 295( भाग ) , 296/2( भाग) 296/3 से 296/5 , 297/1 से 297/8, 298 , 299 , 300/1 , से 300/4 , 301/2 से 301/3 , 302 से 306, 307/1 से 307/3 , 308 से 310 , 311 , 312 , 313 , 314/1 से 314/2 , 315, 316 , 317/1 , से 317/13 , 318 से 320 , 321/1 , 321/4 , 321/5 , 321/9 से 321/32 , 322 से 325 , 326/1 से 326/2 , 327 से 329 , 330/1 , 330/2, 331 से 350 , 351/1 , 351/2 , 352/1 , 352/2 , 352/3 , 353 से 361 , 362/1 से 362/10 , 363 से 374 , 375/1 से 375/5 , 376 से 388 , 389/1 , 389/2 , 390 से 396 , 397/1 , 397/2 , 398 से 404, 405/1 , 405/2 , 406 से 410 , 411/1 , 411/2 , 412 से 415 , 416/1 , 416/2 , 417 से 419 , 420/1 से 420/4, 421 से 424, 425/1 से 425/8 , 426, 427 से 427/4 , 428 से 431 , 432/1 , 432/2 , 433 से 445 ।

3. ग्राम सालेहपली : 192 से 197 , 198 , 199 , 200 , 201 से 203 , 204( भाग ) , 205/1 , 205/3 ( भाग ) , 208 , 215 ( भाग ) , 216 से 218 , 219/5 , 221 ( भाग ) , 222 ( भाग ) , 223 (भाग ) , 236/2, 236/4,( भाग ) , 237 , 239, 240/1 , 240/2( भाग) , 241 , 242/1 , 242/2( भाग ) , 249, 273 , 316 , 320 से 326 , 327 , 341 ( भाग ) , 342 से 344, 345/1 से 345/4 , 346, 347 , 348/1 से 348/3 , 349 , 350 , 351/1 से 351/7, 352/1 से 352/4 , 353 से 360 । 7724

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

4. ग्राम रायकेरा : 17 ( भाग ) , 18 ( भाग ) , 19( भाग ) , 20/1 से 20/4 , 21 से 32 , 33/1 , 33/2, 34 से 40 , 41/1 से 41/4 , 42 से 52, 53/1 से 53/2 , 54 , 55/1 , 55/2 , 56 से 66 , 67/1 से 67/2 , 6869/1 , 69/2 , 71 से 80 , 81/1 से 81/8 , 82, 83/1 , 83/2 , 84 से 90 , 91/1 से 91/5 , 92 से 93 , 94/1 , 94/2 , 95/1 , 95/2 , 96 से 100, 101/1 , 102 , 103/1 , 103/2 , 104/1 , 104/2 , 105 , 106 , 107/1 से 107/3 , 108 से 121 , 122/1 से 122/8 , 123 से 129, 130/1 , 130/2 , 130/3 , 131 से 147 , 148/1 से 148/4, 149, 150/1 से 150/3 , 151 से 156 , 157/1 से 157/3 , 158 , 160 , 161 ( भाग ) , 163/1 , 163/2( भाग ) , 166 ( भाग ) , 167, 168 ( भाग ) , 169 , 170/1 से 170/3 , 171 , 172/1 , 172/2 , 173 , 174 , 175/1 , 175/2 , 176 , 177/1 , 177/2 , 178/1 से 178/5 , 179/1 से 179 , 180, 181/1 , 181/2 , 182 , 183 , 184/1 से 184/4 , 185 ( भाग ) , 186 से 192 , 193/1 , से 193/4, 194 से 196, 197/1 , 197/2 , 198 से 203 , 204/1 , 204/2 , 205 , 206/1 से 206/4 , 207 से 211 , 212/1 से 212/6, 213 , 214 , 215/1 से 215/8 , 216 , 217/1 , 217/2 , 218 से 230 , 231/1 , 231/2 , 232 , 233/1 , 233/2 , 234 से 238 , 239/1 , 239/2 , 239/3 , 240/1 से 240/4 , 241/1 , 241/2 , 242/1 , 243 से 253 , 254/1 , 254/2 , 255 से 266 , 267/1 , 267/2 , 268 , 269 , 270/1 से 270/4 , 271 , 272 , 273/1 , 273/2 , 273/3 , 274/1 से 274/4 , 275 , 276/1 , 276/2 , 277 से 281 , 282/1 से 282/8 , 283 से 286 , 287/1 , 287/2 , 288/1 से 288/3 , 289/1 से 289/3 , 290, 293 , 294 ( भाग ) , 295/1 , से 295/2 , 296/1 , 296/2 , 297 से 301 302/1 , 303 से 307, 308 , 309 , 310/1 , 310/2 , 311 , 312 , 313/1 से 313/8 , 314 से 318 , 319/1 से 319/8 , 320 से 327 , 328/1 , 328/2 , 329 , 330/1 , 330/2 , 331 से 336 , 337/1 , 337/2 , 338 , 339/1 से 339/6 , 339/7 ( भाग ) , 339/8 ( भाग ) , 339/10 , 340 , 341 , 342/1 , 342/2 , 342/6 , 342/7 , 343 से 345 , 346/1 से 346/6 , 347 से 363 , 364/1 , 365 से 382, 383/1 , 384 , 386 ( भाग ) , 389 , 390 ( भाग ) , 393 ( भाग ) , 394, 395/1 , 396/1 , 397( भाग ) , 398 , 399/1 , 400 , 402, 404 , 408 , 411/1 , 447, 482, 483 , 487 , 491 ( भाग ) , 492 ( भाग ) , 493( भाग ) , 494( भाग ) , 495 , 496 , 497/1 से 497/4, 498 से 504 , 505/1 से 505/6 , 506/1 , 506/4 , 513 ( भाग ) , 514, 515 , 535( भाग ) , 536 से 541 , 542 , 543 से 548 , 549( भाग ) , 550 , 551 , 552 , 559 , 655, 657 ( भाग ) ।

5. ग्राम नयारामपुर: 71 , 73/2 ( भाग ) , 74/1 , 74/2( भाग ) , 75/1 से 75/3 , 76 से 106 , 107/1 से 107/5 , 108/1 से 108/2 , 109 से 111 , 112/1 से 112/3 , 113 से 115, 116/1 , 116/2 , 117 , 118/1 से 118/17 , 119 , 120/1 से 120/3 , 121 से 122 , 123/1 से 123/4 , 124 से 129, 130/1 से 130/5 , 131/1 से 131/19 , 132 से 160 , 161/1 से 161/12 , 162 , 163/1 से 163/3 , 164 से 207 , 208/1 से 208/4 , 209/1 से 209/4, 210 से 219 , 220/1 से 220/4 , 221 से 241 , 242 , 243 , 244/1 , 271 ( भाग ) , 272 से 275, 276, 285( भाग ) , 322 , 334 , 340( भाग ) , 341 , 349, 350 ( भाग ) , 351 से 369 , 371 ।

6. ग्राम विछीनारा : 1/1 , 2 , 3/1 से 3/4 , 4 , 5/1 , 5/2 , 6 से 10 , 11/1 से 11/3 , 12 , 13/1 से 13/2 , 13/3 , 14/1 से 14/4 , 15 से 17 , 18/1 से 18/2 , 19 से 21 , 22/1 , 22/2 , 23 , 24 से 24/4 , 25 , 26 , 27/1 से 27/3 , 28 , 29/1 से 29/5 , 29/6, 30 से 35 , 36/1 से 36/3 , 37 , 38/1 , 38/2 , 39 , 40/1 , 40/2 , 41 , 42 , 43/1 से 43/5 , 44 से 46, 47/1 , 47/2,48 से 52, 53/1 , 53/2 , 54 , 55 , 56( भाग ) , 57 , 58 , 59( भाग ) , 63 , 64 ,66 , 67 , 70/1 , 71 , 72 से 73 , 74 , 75/1 , 75/2 , 76 से 81 , 82/1 , 82/2 , 83 , 84/1 से 84/9 , 85 , 86/1 से 86/13 , 87 , 88/ 1,89/ 1 , 89/2 , 90 से 92 , 93/1 से 93/8 , 94 से 96; 97/1 से 97/6 , 98/1 से 98/2, 99 , 100/1 , 100/2 , 101/1 से 101/13 , 102 , 103 से 104 , 105/1 से 105/6 , 106/1 से 106/6 , 107 से 114 , 115/1 से 115/2 , 116 से 122 , 123/1 से 123/7 , 124 , 125 , 126/1 से 126/7 , 127 से 130 , 131/1 से 131/2 , 132 से 138 , 139/1 से 139/4 , 140 , 141/1 से 141/2 , 142/1 से 142/9 , 143/1 से 143/2 , 143/5 , 144/1 से 144/4 , 145 , 146/1 से 146/3 , 147 , 148 , 149/1 से 149/7 , 150 , 151 , 152/1 , 152/2, 153 से 155, 156/1 से 156/2 , 157 , 158 , 159/1 से 159/7, 160 से 162 , 163/1 , 163/2 , 164/1 से 164/3 , 165/1 से 165/3 , 166 , 167 , 168/1 , 168/2 , 169 , 170 , 171/1 , 171/2 1

7. ग्राम तलईपल्ली : 1 से 9 , 10/1 से 10/3 , 11 से 13 , 14/1 से 14/3 , 15 , 16/1 से 16/2 , 17 , 18/1 , से 18/2 , 19 , 20 , 21/1 से 21/2, 22 , 23 से 24 , 25/1 , 25/2 , 26/1 से 26/65 , 27 , 28/1 से 28/5 , 29 , 30/1 से 30/3 , 31 , 32/1 से 32/5 , 33 से 39 , 40/1 से 40/6 , 41/1 , 41/2 , 42 , 43/1 से 43/3 , 44 से 47 , 48/1 से 48/2 , 49 से 56, 57/1 से 57/3 , 58 से 62 , 63/1 से 63/7 , 64 , 65/1 से 65/7 , 66/1 , 66/2 , 67 , 68 , 69/1 से 69/4 , 70 से 76 , 77/1 से 77/3 , 78 , 79 , 80/1 से 80/5 , 81 से 86 , 87/1 से 87/18 , 88 से 91 , 92/1 से 92/7 , 93/1 से 93/13 , 94 से 96 , 97/1 से 97/5 , 98 , 99, 100, 101/1 से 101/2 , 102 से 118 , 119/1 से 119/5 , 120 से 123 , 124/1 से 124/5 , 125 , 126/1 से 126/13 , 127 से 129 , 130/1 से 130/16 , 131/1 से 131/6 , 132 से 136 1

8. ग्राम कुदुरमहुआ : 1 , 2 , 3 , 7 ( भाग ) , 18 ( भाग) , 19 , 20 , 21 ( भाग ) , 22 से 89 , 90/1 से 90/11 , 91 , 92, 93 , 94, 95 से 107, 108 , 109 से 141 , 142 , 145( भाग ) , 157 ( भाग ) , 158 से 191 1

धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित किए जाने वाले वन कम्पार्टमेंट सं. की सूची:

: 531 (भाग ) ।

1. ग्राम अजीजगढ़

:543(पूर्ण ) ।

2. ग्राम छोटीगुढ़ा

3. ग्राम विछीनारा

: 536( भाग ) , 542 ( पूर्ण ) , 543 ( पूर्ण ) ।

4. ग्राम तलईपल्ली

: 539( पूर्ण ) 541 ( पूर्ण ) , 540( पूर्ण ) , 535 ( भाग ) ।

: 538( पूर्ण ) , 537 ( भाग ) ।

5. ग्राम कुदुरमहुआ 7725 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14, 1931

धारा 9 ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित किए जाने वाले ब्लॉक क्षेत्र का सीमा वर्णन: -

रेखा:- क ख ग ग घ घाड़ ड़ा च रेखा ग्राम बाहमनपल्ली ( थाना लेइलुन्गा ) के संरक्षित वन क्षेत्र के भीतर स्थित बिन्दु ' क' से आरम्भ होकर दक्षिण- पूर्व दिशा की ओर जाती हुई ग्राम अजीजगढ़ के प्लाट सं. 35 और 40 तथा ग्राम छोटीगुढ़ा के प्लाट सं. 293 , 294/4, 296/2 से गुजरती हुई वन क्षेत्र के भीतर स्थित बिन्दु ' ख ' तक बढ़ती है । तत्पश्चात् यह रेखा दक्षिण की ओर जाते हुई ग्राम छोटीगुढ़ा के प्लाट सं. 297/1 , 300/2 , 300/3 से गुजरती हुई उक्त ग्राम के प्लाट सं. 323 के अन्दर स्थित बिन्दु ' ग ' तक जाती है । इसके पश्चात् यह रेखा दक्षिण- पूर्व दिशा की ओर जाती हुई सरकारी वन क्षेत्र से गुजरती हुई ग्राम बिछीनारा ( थाना घरघोड़ा ) के पश्चिमी सीमा को उक्त ग्राम के प्लाट सं. 59 पर स्थित बिन्दु ' ग। ' पर काटती है । इसके पश्चात् यह रेखा उसी दिशा में आगे बढ़ती हुई ग्राम बिछीनारा के प्लाट सं. 56 , 63 , 67 और 70/1 से गुजरती हुई ग्राम कुदुरमहुआ के प्लाट सं. 3 पर स्थित बिन्दु ' घ ' तक जाती है । इसके पश्चात् यह रेखा दक्षिण दिशा में बढ़ती हुई उक्त ग्राम के प्लाट सं. 89 पर स्थित बिन्दु ' घ। ' तक बढ़ती है । इसके पश्चात् यह रेखा उत्तर - पूर्व दिशा में जाते हुए प्लाट सं. 21 , 20 , 19 से गुजरती हुई ग्राम कुदुरमहुआ के प्लाट सं. 17 पर स्थित बिन्दु ' ड़ ' तक जाती है । इसके पश्चात् यह रेखा दक्षिण- पूर्व दिशा में जाती हुई प्लाट सं. 145 , 143 ,157 से गुजरती हुई और ग्राम कुदुरमहुआ के पूर्वी सीमा को उक्त ग्राम के प्लाट सं. 160 पर स्थित बिन्दु ' ड़। ' पर काटती है । इसके पश्चात् यह रेखा उसी दिशा में बढ़ते हुए ग्राम मरियाकाक्षार के दक्षिणी भाग में संरक्षित वन क्षेत्र के आगे स्थित बिन्दु ' च ' पर समाप्त होती है । रेखा: -च- चा च2 च3 च4- छ रेखा ग्राम मरियाकाक्षार के दक्षिणी भाग में स्थित बिन्दु ' च ' से आरम्भ होकर नदी के किनारे- किनारे जाती हुई बिन्दु ' च।'-' च2'-' च3 '-' च4 ' से गुजरती हुई ग्राम नयारामपुर ( थाना घरघोड़ा ) के दक्षिणी पूर्वी किनारे पर स्थित उक्त ग्राम के प्लाट सं. 371 पर स्थित बिन्दु ' छ ' पर समाप्त होती है ।

रेखा:- छ ज ज झ ञ ट रेखा ग्राम नयारामपुर के प्लाट सं. 371 पर स्थित बिन्दु ' छ' से आरम्भ होकर उत्तर पश्चिम दिशा में जाते हुए प्लाट सं. 365 , 340 , 341 , 273 , 272 , 242 , 71 , 350 , 276 , 244/1 से गुजरती हुई ग्राम रायकेरा के पूर्वी सीमा को प्लाट सं. 383 पर काटती है और प्लाट सं. 381 , 385 , 389 , 393 , 397 से गुजरती हुई उक्त ग्राम के प्लाट सं. 399/1 पर स्थित बिन्दु ' ज ' तक जाती है । इसके पश्चात् यह रेखा पश्चिम दिशा में जाती हुई प्लाट सं. 408 , 339/1 , 411/1 , 294 , 293 , 505/6 , 655 , 515 से गुजरती हुई और ग्राम रायकेरा के प्लाट सं. 552 पर स्थित बिन्दु ' जा ' तक जाती है । उसके पश्चात् यह रेखा उत्तर की ओर जाती हुई ग्राम रायकेरा के प्लाट सं. 17 , 20/4 , 19 से गुजरती हुई ग्राम सलेहपल्ली के उत्तरी सीमा में उक्त ग्राम के प्लाट सं. 316 पर स्थित बिन्दु' झ ' से प्रवेश करती है । उसके पश्चात् यह रेखा प्लाट सं. 321 , 341 से गुजरती हुई और ग्राम सलेहपल्ली के प्लाट सं. 249 पर स्थित बिन्दु ' ञ ' तक बढ़ती है । उसके पश्चात् यह रेखा पूर्व की ओर आगे बढ़ते हुए ग्राम सलेहपल्ली के प्लाट सं. 241 , 239 , 221 , 215 से गुजरती हुई तथा ग्राम रायकेरा के प्लाट सं. 158 तक बढ़ती है और अन्ततः ग्राम रायकेरा के प्लाट सं. 157/2 पर स्थित बिन्दु ' ट ' पर समाप्त होती है ।

रेखा:- ट ठ क: यह रेखा प्लाट सं. 157/2 पर स्थित बिन्दु ' ट ' से आरम्भ होकर उत्तर दिशा में बढ़ते हुए ग्राम रायकेरा के प्लाट सं. 159 , 161 , 168 , 169 और 166से गुजरती है तथा ग्राम सलेहपल्ली के प्लाट सं. 208 से गुजरती हुई ग्राम रायकेरा के प्लाट सं. 185 और 186 से गुजरती है तथा उसके पश्चात् रेखा ग्राम सलेहपल्ली के प्लाट सं. 205/3 , 204 और 203 से गुजरती हुई उक्त ग्राम के उत्तरी सीमा को प्लाट सं. 196 पर. काटती है । उसके पश्चात् रेखा उक्त ग्राम के प्लाट सं. 213/2 , 226 , 227 , 231 , 232 , 237 , 239 , 84 , 64 , 65 , 56 और 52/1 से गुजरती है । उसके पश्चात् रेखा उसी दिशा में ऊपर की ओर जाती हुई ग्राम अजीजगढ़ के प्लाट सं. 26 से गुजरती हुई उक्त ग्राम के प्लाट सं. 25 पर स्थित बिन्दु'ठ ' पर समाप्त होती है । उसके पश्चात् रेखा उत्तर पूर्व दिशा में बढ़ती हुई ग्राम अजीजगढ़ के प्लाट सं. 26 , 27 और 28 से गुजरती है तथा उसके पश्चात् रेखा उसी दिशा में आगे बढ़ती हुई अन्ततः ग्राम बाहमनपल्ली ( थाना लेइलुन्गा ) के संरक्षित वन क्षेत्र के अन्दर बिन्दु ' ठ के उत्तर पूर्व दिशा में स्थित बिन्दु ' क ' पर समाप्त होती है ।.

[सं.-43015/6/2006- पी. आर. आई. डब्ल्यू-1 ( वाल्यूम- III ) ]

एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 27th November , 2009

S.O. 3281. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 1563 , dated the 3rd June , 2009, issued under sub- section ( 1) of Section 7 of the Coal BearingAreas ( Acquisition and Development ) Act, 1957 ( 20 of 1957) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in the Gazette of India, Part - II, Sectlon - 3, Sub- section ( ii ) , dated the 6th June , 2009 , the Central Covernment gave notice of its intention to acquire the lands and all rights in or over such lands specified in the Schedule appended to that notification;

And, whereas the competent authority in pursuance of Section 8 of the said Act has made his report to the Central Government;

And, whereas the Central Government, after considering the report aforesaid and after consulting the Government ofChhattisgarh , is satisfied that the lands measuring 2094.89 hectares (approximately ) or 5174.3783 acres ( approximately ) and all rights in or over such lands as described in Schedule appended hereto should be acquired;

7726

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 9 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the land measuring 2094.89 hectares (approximately ) or 5174.3783 acres ( approximately ) and all rights in or over such lands as described in Schedule are hereby acquired;

The plan bearing number NTPC /TCMP /SEC 9 ( 1 )/Talaipalli/09 /01 dated 01-08-2009 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the office of the District Collector , District Raigarh , Chattisgarh or in the office of the Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street, Kolkatta -70000 1 or in the office of AGM (I /c ) , Talaipalli Coal Mining Project, NTPC Ltd. , 56, Gajanandpuram , Kotra Thana Road , Raigarh - 496001 , Chhattisgarh or in the office of Deputy General Manager (CM- Civil) , NTPCLtd. , 1 st floor , PDIL Building, Sector - I , Naida, Uttar Pradesh -201301 .

SCHEDULE

TALAIPALLI MINING BLOCK

DISTRICT: RAIGARH , CHHATTISGARH

Plan No .: NTPC/TCMP/Sec 9 ( 1 ) /Talaipalli / 09 / 01 dated 01-08-2009

ALL RIGHTS

(A) REVENUE LAND

Thana

District Village

Serial number

Ajijgarh

Gharghoda Raigarh 02

Raigarh

Gharghoda

Chotigurha

Raigarh

Gharghoda

Salehpalli

Raikera

Raigarh

Gharghoda

Raigarh

Gharghoda

Nayarampur

Bichinara

Raigarh

Gharghoda

Tanmar

Raigarh Talaipalli

Kudurmahua

Raigarh

Leilunga

Total Area

(B) FOREST LAND

District

Thana

Village

Serial number

Raigarh

Gharghoda

Ajijgarh

Chotigurha

Raigarh

Gharghoda

Bichinara

Gharghoda Raigarh

Tanmar

Rigarh Talaipalli

Kudurmahua Leilunga

Raigarh TotalArea

Total area

(Approximately)

Remarks Hectare

Acre

Thana number

Part 20.87

51.5489

790.1036

Part 319.88

91.2171

Part 36.93

1484.0501 Part 600.83

Part

325.9165

131.95

Part 360.22

889.7434

728.9711 Full 295.13

Part 28

121.65

300.4755

4662.0262

1887.46

Total area

(Approximately )

Remarks Hectare Acre

Compartment number

5.5081

2.23

Part 531(Part)

Full

46.9300

19.00

543(Full)

Part 536(Part)

139.5550

Full 56.50

542(Full)

Full 543(Full)

Full 539(Full)

Full

111.20

274.6640

541 (Full)

Full 540(Full )

Part 535(Part)

45.6950

Full

18.50

538 (Full)

Part 537(Part)

207.43

512.3521 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7727

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14, 1931

Summary:

(A) Total Revenue Land : 1887.46 hectares ( Approximately) 4662.0262 acres (Approximately)

(B) Total Forest Land: 207.43 hectares (Approximately) = 512.3521 acres ( Approximately)

( C) Grand Total (A + B) :

2094.89 hectares (Approximately)

5174.3783 acres (Approximately)

List ofRevenue Plots to be Notified U/s 9(1 ) :

1. Village Ajijgarh: 25 (part), 26(part), 27(part), 28, 29, 30 , 31 , 32,33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 , 40 (Part)

2.VillageChotigurha: 50, 52/1 , 53 , 54, 55/1 , 55/2, 56, 57, 58/1 , 58/2 , 58/3 , 58/4, 58/5 , 59, 60, 61/1 , 61/2, 62, 63/1 , 63/2, 63/3 , 64, 65, 66 (part ), 70, 71 , 76, 83 , 84 (part ), 85, 86/1 (part), 86/2, 86/3 , 88 , 89 , 202 (part ), 212, 213/1 , 213/2 ( part ) , 214 to 224, 225 (part), 226(part) , 227 (part ), 228 to 232, 238, 239 (part) , 240/1 , 240/2,241 to 244, 245/1,245/2, 245/3 , 246, 247, 248/1,248/2, 249 to 258 , 259/1,259/2,260,261 , 262 to 270,271 / 1 to 271/8, 272 to 278 , 279/1 to 279 /3,280/ 1 to 280/3,281 .to 293 , 294/1 , 294/2 to 294/3 ,294/ 4(part), 294/7 to 294/10, 294/11 (part), 295(part ), 296/2(part ), 296/3 to 296/5 , 297/1 to 297/8, 298 , 299, 300/1 to 300/4, 301/2 to 301/3 , 302 to 306, 307/1 to 307/3,308 to 310, 311 , 312, 313 , 314/1 to 314/2, 315, 316, 317/1 to 317/13 , 318 to 320, 321/1 , 321/4,321 / 5,321/9 to 321/32, 322 to 325 , 326/1 , 326/2, 327 to 329, 330/1 , 330/2, 33 1 to 350 , 351/ 1,351 /2,352/ 1,352/2,352/3 , 353 to 361,362/ 1 to362/10, 363 to374, 375/1 to 375/5, 376 to 388, 389/1 , 389/2, 390 to 396, 397/1 , 397/2,398 to404, 405/1 , 405/2, 406 to 410,411/ 1,411 /2,412 to 415, 416/1 , 416/2, 417 to 419, 420/1 to 420/4,421 to 424, 425/1 to 425/8 , 426, 427/1 to 427/4, 428 to 431 , 432/1 , 432/ 2,433 to445.

3.Village Salehpali : 192, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201 to203, 204 (part) , 205/1 , 205/3 (part ), 208, 215 (part) , 216 to 218, 219/5 , 221 (part ), 222(part ), 223 (part ), 236/2, 236/4 (part) , 237, 239, 240/1 , 240/2 (part ) , 241 , 242/2 (part ), 249 , 273 , 316, 320 to 326, 327, 341 (part ) , 342 to344, 345/1 to 345/4, 346, 347, 348/1 to 348/3 , 349, 350, 351/1 to 351/7 , 352/1 to 352/4, 353 to360.

4.Village Raikera: 17 (part ), 18( part), 19 (part ), 20/1 to 20/4 . 21 to 32, 33/1 , 33/2, 34 to40, 41/1 to 41/4 , 42 to 52, 53/1 to 53/2, 54, 55/1 , 55/2 , 56 to 66, 67/1 to 67/2 , 68 , 69/1 , 69/2 , 71 to 80, 81/1 to 81/8 , 82, 83/1 , 83/2 , 84 to 90 , 91/1 to 91/5 , 92 to 93 , 94/1,94/ 2,95/1 , 95/2 , 96 to 100 , 101/1 , 102, 103/1 , 103/2 , 104/1, 104/2 , 105 , 106, 107/1 to 107/3 , 108 to 122, 122/1 to 122/8, 123 to 129, 130/ 1,130/2 , 130/3 , 131 to 147, 148/1 to 148/4, 149, 150/1 to 150/3 , 151 to 156, 157/1 to 157/3 , 158 , 160, 161 (part ), 163/1 , 163/2 (part ), 166(part), 167, 168( part), 169,170/ 1 to 170/3 , 171 , 172/1 , 172/2 , 173 , 174, 175/ 1,175 /2,176,177/ 1 , 177/2 , 178/1 to 178 /5,179 / 1 to 179/7,180 , 181/1 , 181/2 , 182, 183 , 184/1 to 184/4, 185 (part), 186to 192, 193/1 to 193/4, 194 to 196, 197/1 , 197/2, 198 to 203 , 204/ 1,204/2, 205, 206/1 to 206/4 , 207 to211, 212/1 to 212/6, 213 , 214,215/1 to 215/8 , 216 , 217/ 1,211 /2,218 to 230 , 231 / 1,231/2,232, 233/1 , 233/2 , 234 to 238 , 239/1 , 239/2 , 239/3 , 240/1 to 240/4 , 241/1 , 241/2, 242/1 , 243 to 253 , 254/1 , 254/2,255 to 266, 267/1 , 267/2, 268, 269, 270/1 to 270/4 , 271 , 272, 273/1 , 273/2, 273/3 , 274/1 to 274/4, 275, 276/1 , 276/2, 277 to 281 , 282/1 to 282/8 , 283 to 286,287/1 , 287/2, 288/1 to 288/3 , 289/1 to 289/3 , 290 , 293 , 294 (part ) , 295/1 to 295/2, 296/1 , 296/2, 297 to 301,302/1,303 to307 , 308, 309 , 310/1 , 310/2, 311 , 312, 313/1 to 313/8 , 314 to 318 , 319/1 to 319/8 , 320 to 327 , 328/1 , 328/2 , 329 , 330/1 , 330/2 , 331 to 336, 337/1 , 337/2 , 338 , 339/1 to 339/6,339/7 ( part), 339/8 (part ), 339/10, 340 , 341 , 342/1 , 342/2, 342/6, 342/7, 343 to 345, 346/1 . to 346/6, 347 to 363 , 364/1 , 365 to 382, 383/1 , 384 , 386 (part ), 389, 390 (part) , 393 (part ), 394, 395/1 , 396/1 , 397 ( part ) , 398 , 399/1,400,402,404,408, 411/1 , 447, 482, 483, 487, 491 (part).492(part),493 (part), 494( part), 495,496,497/ 1 to 497/4,498 to504, 505/1 to 505/6, 506/1 , 506/4, 513 (part), 514, 515, 535 (part ),536 to 541 , 542, 543 to 548 , 549 (part), 550, 551 , 552, 559, 655,657 (part).

5. Village Nayarampur : 71 , 73/2 (part ), 74/1 , 74/2 (part ) , 75/1 to 75/3, 76 to 106, 107/1 to 107/5 , 108/1 to 108/2, 109 to 111 , 112/1 to 112/3 , 113 to 115, 116/1 , 116/2, 117 , 118/1 to 118/17, 119 , 120/1 to 120/3 , 121 to 122, 123/1 to 123/4 , 124 to 129, 130/1 to 130/5 , 131/1 to 131/19, 132 to 160, 161/1 to 161/12 , 162, 163/1 to 163/3 , 164 to 207 , 208/1 to 208/4 , 209/1 to 209/4, 210 to 219, 220/1 to 220/4, 221 to 241 , 242, 243 , 244/1 , 271 ( part ), 272 to 275 , 276, 285 (part ), 322, 334, 340( Part), 341 , 349, 350(part), 351 to 369,371.

6. Village Bichhinara : 1 / 1,2,3 / 1 to 3/4 , 4, 5/1 , 5/2 , 6 to 10, 11/1 to 11/3 , 12 , 13/1 to 13/2 , 13/3 , 14/1 to 14/ 4,15 to 17 , 18/1 to 18/ 2,19 to 21 , 22/1, 22/2, 23 , 24/1 to 24/4, 25 , 26 , 27/1 to 27/3, 28 , 29/1 to 29/5, 29/6, 30 to 35 , 36/1 to 36/3 , 37 , 38/1 , 38/2, 39, 40/1 , 40/2,41 , 42, 43/1 to43/5, 44 to 46, 47/1 , 47/2, 48 to 52, 53/1 , 53/2, 54, 55, 56 (part ) , 57, 58, 59 (part) , 63 , 64, 66, 67, 70/1 , 71 , 72 to 73, 74, 75/1 , 75/2, 76 to 81 , 82/1 , 82/2 , 83 , 84/1 to 84/9, 85, 86/1 to 86/13 , 87, 88/1 , 89/1 , 89/2, 90 to 92, 93/1 to 93/8 , 94 to 96, 97/1 to 97/6 , 98/1 to 98/2 , 99 , 100/1 , 100/2 , 101/1 to 101/13 , 102 , 103 to 104, 105/1 to 105/6, 106/1 to 106/6, 107 to 114, 115/1 to 115/2, 116 to 122, 123/1 to 123/7, 124, 125, 126/1 to 126/7 , 127 to 130, 131/1 to 131/2, 132 to 138, 139/1 to 139/4, 140, 141/1 to 141/2,142/1 to 142/9, 143/1 to 143/2, 143/5, 144/1 to 144/4, 145, 146/1 to 146/3,147, 148 , 149/1 to 149/1 , 150, 151 , 152/1 , 152/2 , 153 to 155 , 156/1 to 156/2 , 157 , 158 , 159/1 to 159/7 , 160 to 162, 163/1 , 163/2, 164/1 to 164/3 , 165/1 to 165/3 , 166 , 167, 168/1,168/2, 169, 170, 171/1 , 171/2 .

7. Village Talaipalli : 1 to 9, 10/1 to 10/3 , 11 to 13 , 14/1 to 14/3 , 15 , 16/1 to 16/2, 17, 18/1 to 18/2, 19, 20, 21/1 to 21/2, 22, 23 to 24,25/1,25/2,26/ 1 to 26/65 , 27, 28/1 to 28/5 , 29 , 30/1 to 30/3 , 31 , 32/1 to 32/5 , 33 to 39, 40/1 to 40/6 , 41/1 , 41/2 , 42 , 43/1 to 7728

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009 / AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

43/3,44 to47,48/1 to 48/2, 49.to 56, 57/1 to 57/3 , 58 to 62, 63/1 to 63/7, 64, 65/1 to 65/7, 66/1 , 66/2, 67, 68 , 69/1 to 69/4 , 70 to76, 77/1 to 77/3 , 78 , 79 , 80/1 to 80/5 , 81 to 86, 87/1 to 87/18 , 88 to 91 , 92/1 to 92/7 , 93/1 to 93/13 , 94 to 96, 97/1 to 97/5 , 98, 99 , 100 , 101 11 to 101/22, 102 to 118, 119/1 to 119/5, 120 to 123 , 124/1 to 124/5 , 125 , 126/1 to 126/13 , 127 to 129, 130/1 to 130/16, 131/1 to 131/6, 132 to 136.

8. Village Kudurmahua: 1 , 2 , 3 , 7 (part ), 18 (part) , 19 , 20, 21 (part ), 22 to 89, 90/1 to 90/11 , 91 , 92, 93 , 94 , 95 to 107, 108, 109 to 141 , 142, 145 (part) , 157 ( part), 158 to 191 .

Listof Forest Compartment Nos . to be Notified U/s 9( 1 ) :

1. VillageAjijgarh

: 531 (part)

2.Village Chotigurha

: 543 (Full)

: 536 (part), 542 (full ), 543 ( Full) .

3. Village Bichhinara

4. Village Talaipalli

: 539 (Full ), 541 (Full), 540 (Full ), 535 (Part) .

5. Village Kudurmahua : 537 (Part ), 538 (Full)

Boundary Description of the Block Area to be notified u/s 9( 1 )

Line A- B - C - C1 - D - DI - E - E1- F : The line starts from point ' A' inside the protected forest area of village Bahamanpali (Thana Leilunga) moves in south - east direction through plot numbers 35 and 40 of village Ajijgarh , plot numbers 293 , 294/4, 296/2 of village Chotigurha up to point /B ' inside the forest then it moves southward through plot numbers 297/1 , 300/ 2 and 300/3 ofvillage Chotigurha up to point ' C' in the plot number 323 ofthe said village. It further moves in the south east direction passes through the Government Forest , cuts the westem boundary of the village Bichhinara (Thana Gharghoda) at point ' C 1 ' in plot number 59 ofthe said village . It further moves in the same direction and passes through plot numbers 56, 63 , 67 and 70/1 of the village Bichhinara up to point ' D' at plot number 3 of village Kudurmahua . It then moves south ward and passes through point ' DI ' at plot number 89 of the said village . It then moves in the north east direction and passes through plot numbers 21 , 20, 19 up to point - E ' at plot number 17 of village kudurmahua, It then moves in the south east direction and passes through plot numbers 145,143,157 and cuts the eastem boundary of the village Kudurmahua at point ' El ' at plot number 160 of the said village. It further moves in the same direction and up to point ' F ' irf the southern part of the village Mariakachhar beyond the protected forest .

Line F - .F1 - F2- F3 - F4-G: The line starts from point ' F ' in the southern part of the village Mariakachhar moves along thebank ofthe river through the points ' FI ' , ' F2 ' , ' F3 ', ' F4 ' and finally ends at point ' G ' in the south- east comer of the village Nayarampur (Thana Gharghoda) on the plot number 371 of said village .

Line G - H - HI - I- . J - K : The line starts from point ' G ' at plot number 371 of village Nayarampur moves in north west direction and passes through plot numbers 365, 340 , 341 , 349, 273 , 272, 242, 71 , 350, 276, 244/1 cuts the eastern boundary of village Raikera at plot number 383 passes through plot numbers 381 , 385 , 389, 393 , 397 and point "H ' at plot number 399/1 ofthe said village . The line then moves west Ward and passes through plot numbers 408, 339/8 , 411 / 1,294, 293 , 505/6, 655, 515 and point ' Hl ' at plot number 552 of the village Raikera . The line then moves north ward and passes through plot numbers 17, 20/4 , 19 of village Raikera and enters the village Salehpali at point ' 1 ' in plot number 316 of the said village . It then passes through plot numbers 321 , 341 and point ' J ' at plot number 249 of the village Salehpali The line then moves east ward and passes through plot numbers 241 , 239 , 221 , 215 ofthe village Salehpali and plot numbers 158 of the village Raikera and ends at point ' K' on plot number 157/2 of the village Raikera .

Line K- L- A: The line starts from point ' K ' at plot number 157/2 moving towards north passing through plot numbers 159, 161, 168, 163 and 166 of village Raikera then passes through piot number 208 of village Salehpali , plot numbers 185 and 186 ofvillage Raikera, then passes through plot numbers 205/3 , 204, and 203 of village Salehpali cutting its northern boundary at plot numbers 196 of the said village . The line then passes through plot numbers 213/2 , 226 , 227 , 231 , 232 , 237 , 239, 84, 64 , 65,56 and 52/1 of said village. The line then moves upward in the same direction passing through plot number 26 of village Ajijgarh and ends at point ' L' of plot number 25 of said village . The line then moves in the north- east direction passes through plot numbers 26,27 and 28 ofvillage Ajijgarh . The line then moves further in the same direction and finally ends at point ' A' in the protected forest of village Bahamanpali ( Thana Leilunga ) north - east to point ' L' .

[No. - 43015/6/2006/PRIW - I (Vol . 111 ) ] M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy.

7729 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 3282.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप ( उड़ीसा) से रायपुर ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) एवं राँची ( झारखण्ड) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिये इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा " पारादीप - न्यू सम्बलपुर- रायपुर राँची पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिये ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि, जिसके नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के लिए भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्री सुकान्त कुमार प्रधान , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , पारादीप न्यू सम्बलपुर- रायपुर - राँची पाइपलाइन परियोजना , 1295 , फॉरेस्ट पार्क , भुवनेश्वर 751009 (उड़ीसा) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

तहसील - पिपिलि

जिला - पुरी

राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

251

14 सारोल

244

243

239

238

258

259

235

234

266

267

274

19 4233 GI/09-8 7730

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 5 , 2009 /AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931 [Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii) ] तहसील - पिपिलि

जिला - पुरी

राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

235 93

1504

44 लक्ष्मीनारायणपुर

1520

1505

1519

1518

1480

1465

1462

1459

1461

1563

1450

1449

1447

1446

1291

1290

1289

1288

1287

652

651

बिलिपडा

1042

181

38 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ai) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

7731 तहसील- पिपिलि

जिला - पुरी

राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर

182

183

184

185

175

176

178

177

188

189

191

206

204

203

211

212

213

214

231

232

226

229

228

242

243

244

246

248

245

247

257

256

260

259

262

261

265

266

82 7732

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

जिला- पुरी तहसील - पिपिलि

प्लाट नं.

गांव का नाम

267

865 कुंजर

873

1100

1108

1110

1121

1118

1120

1119

1132

1133

1131

1138

1141

1142

1145

741 हरीअन्ता

740

736

737

738

735

733

732

730

721

716

715

717 राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

02 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

7733 तहसील - पिपिलि

जिला- पुरी

राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

719

718

710

704

708

709

707

705

631

402

401

199

गोबिन्दपुर

198

195

194

162

161

163

192

191

165

164

155

148

146

147

144

66 7734

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

तहसील - पिधिलि

जिला- पुरी

प्लाट नं.

गांव का नाम

143

142

141

105

112

110

108

893 आरुहा

871

872

870

867

866

856

857

858

860

859

861

[Part II-Sec. 3(ii) ] राज्य - उड़ीला

क्षेत्रफल

एबर

हेक्टेयर

बर्ग मीटर

01 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

7735 तहसील - पिपिलि

जिला पुरी

राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

278

277

276

275

274

934

174

175

176

172

171

170

169

168

166

91 सिठला

2679

-00

2678

2677

2676

2675

2643

2642

2640

2644

2639

2638

2637

2634

2633

2632

75 [Part II-- Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] 7736

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009 / AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

राज्य - उड़ीसा

जिला - पुरी

तहसील - पिपिलि

क्षेत्रफल

प्लाट नं.

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

2564

2563

2392

2391

2390

2389

2403

2388

2404

2405

2385

2384

2374

2375

2370

2350

2361

2351

2352

2360

2359

2358

2357

2356

2695

2330

2568

2566

2567

507 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

7737 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

तहसील - पिपिलि

जिला - पुरी

राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

508

506

509

497

496

477

476

475

474

444

443

442

375

386

387

388

389

366

390

391

392

395

394

362

361.

360

346

399

400

402

34 4233 G1/09-9 [Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii )) 7738

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

राज्य - उड़ीसा

जिला - पुरी

तहसील - पिपिलि

क्षेत्रफल

प्लाट नं.

गांव का नाम

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर

5 1

401

403

404

344

214

माटिआपडा - 2

213

212

211

210

205

204

203

280

281

282

283

285

284

- [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

7739 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

तहसील - पिपिलि

जिला - पुरी

राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

12.

98 पमसरा

779

480

479

475

345

340

341

339

338

337

335

306

336

331

307

308

310

302

301

298

299

00:

300

268

267

265

229

76 7740

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5, 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931 [Part 11-Sec . 3 ( ii) ] तहसील - पिपिलि

जिला- पुरी

राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

प्लाट नं.

गांव का नाम

एयर

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर 1

225

226

227

223

220

269

161

[फा. सं. आर. - 25011/14/2009- ओ.आर.

बी. के. दत्ता , अवर सचिव Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2009

S. O. 3282. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transporation of petroleum products from Paradip (Orissa ) to Raipur ( Chhattisgarh ) & Ranchi (Jharkhand ) , " Paradip New Sambalpur Raipur Ranchi Pipeline " should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of this notification , as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Sukanta Kumar Pradhan , Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited , Paradip -New Sambalpur - Raipur- Ranchi Pipeline Project , 1295 , Forest Park, Bhubaneswar - 751009 , ( Orissa) .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

7741 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/ अग्रहायण 14 ,, 1931

SCHEDULE

State: ORISSA

Tehsil: PIPILI

District: PURI

Area

PlotNO.

Nameof the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr .

5 1

251

SAROL

244

243

239

238

258

259

235

234

266

267

274

1504

LAKSHMINARAYANPUR

1520

1505

1519

52.

1518

1480

1465

1462

1459

1461

05 7742

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5, 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

Tehsil: PIPILI

District: PURI

PlotNO.

Nameofthe Village

1563

1450

1449

1447

1446

1291

1290

1289

1288

1287

652

651 BILIPARA

1042

181.

182

183

184

185

175

176

178

177

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii ) ] State: ORISSA

Hectare

Атва Are Sq.mtr.

97 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009 /अग्रहायण 14 ,, 1931

Tehsil: PIPILI

7743 State: ORISSA

District: PURI

PlotNO .

Nameof theVillage

188

189

191

206

204

203

211

212

213

214

231

232

226

229

228

242

243

244

246

248

245

247

257

256

260

259

262

261

205

206 Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 3

00 7744

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009 /AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931 [Part II-Sec. 3( ii ) ] Tehsil: PIPILI

State: ORISSA

District: PURI

PlotNO.

Name of the Village

Area Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr .

267

54 KUNJAR

865

873

1100

1108

1110

1121

1118

1120

1119

1132

1133

1131

1138

1141

1142

1145

741

HARIANTA

740

736

737

738

735

733

732

730

721

716

715

717

02 7745 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/ अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) }

State: ORISSA

Tehsil: PIPILI

District: PURI

Plot NO .

Name of theVillage

Hectare

Area Are Sq.mtr.

719

718

710

704

708

709

707

705

631

402

401

92 GOBINDPUR

199

198

195

194

162

161

163

192

191

165

164

155

148

146

147

144

4233 G1/09-10 [Pad H-Sec.3 7746

DECEMBER 5, 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA:

Diebict: PUR

Toheil: PIPILI

PlotNO.

Name ofthe

Hectare

Area Are

148

142

144

105

112

110

108

100

ARUHA

878

01 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/ अग्रहायण 14, 1931

7747 Total:PUPILI

District:

PlotNO.

Theme ofthe Village

276

217

275

274

174

175

172

171

170

150

198

166

91 SIULA

2679

2678

2677

2676

2675

2643

2642

2640

2544

75 7748

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

District : PURI Tehsil: PIPILI

PlotNO.

Nameof theVillage

2564

2563

2392

2391

2390

2389

2403

2388

2404

2405

2385

2384

2374

2375

2370

2350

2361

2351

2352

2360

2359

2358

2357

2356

2695

2330

2568

2566

2567

507

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] State: ORISSA

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 3

27 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

Tehsil : PIPILI

District: PURI

PlotNO.

Nameof the Village

508

506

509

497

496

477

476

475

474

444

443<

442

375

386

387

388

389

366

390

391

392

395

394

362

361

360

346

399

400

402

7749 State: ORISSA

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

17.

34 7750

[Part II-Sec . 3( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

State: GRESSA

District: PURI

Tehsil: PIPILI

PlotNO.

NameoftheVillage

fue Sigmir.

Hectare

401

403

404

344

214

MATIAPARA-2

213

212

211

210

205

204

203

280

281

282

283

285

284

00:

12 7751 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

State: ORISSA

District: PURI

Tehsil: PIPII

Area

PlotNO.

NameoftheVillage

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

779

PAMASARA

480

479

475

345

340

341

339

338

337

335

306

336

331

307

308

310

302

301

298

299

300

268

267

265

229

76 [Part II-Sec . 3(ii )] 7752

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5, 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931.

State: ORISSA

District: PURI

Tehsil: PIPILI

Area

PlotNO.

Name oftheVillage

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

225

226

227

223

220

269

161

[F. No. R- 25011 /14/2009-O.R. -I ] B.K.DATTA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 नवम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 3283.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप ( उड़ीसा ) से रायपुर (छत्तीसगढ़ ) एवं राँची (झारखण्ड) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिये इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा " पारादीप - न्यू सम्बलपुर रायपुर राँची पाइपलाइन" बिछाई जानी चाहिये;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि, जिसके नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है, में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के लिए भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्री सुकान्त कुमार प्रधान , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , पारादीप न्यू सम्बलपुर रायपुर - राँची पाइपलाइन परियोजना , 1295 , फॉरेस्ट पार्क , भुवनेश्वर - 751009 ( उड़ीसा ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

HH 7753 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

अनुसूची

राज्य उड़ीसा

जिला - कटक

तहसील निआलि

क्षेत्रफल

प्लाट नं.

गांव का नाम

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

1043

81 ओडपडा

414

415

00.

416

432

481

480

482

506

505

504

483

479

502

500

494

495

493

484

485

489

490

491

492

488

463

462

292

540

4233 G1/09--11 [Part 11-Sec . 3 ( ii) ] 7754

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

जिला - कटक

तहसील - निआलि

राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

प्लाट नं.

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

541

291

542

543

289

290

299

287

270

269

264

265

261

263

262

260

259

255

256

257

251

250

249

235

233

248

236

237

239

232

00 7755 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

[ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य उडीसा

जिला कटक

तहसील- निआलि

क्षेत्रफल

प्लाट नं.

गांव का नाग

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

211

231

226

213

225

1064

214

1065

216

215

220

221

222

223

6468

सिठालो

6469

6434

6436

6435

6433

6432

6431

6430

6722

6391

6392

6393

6394

6395

31.

6347 7756

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009 / AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931 [Part II-Sec . 3( ii) ] तहसील - निआलि

जिला - कटक

राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

6346

6398

6344

6021

6020

6022

6014

6063

6064

5997

5995

5996

5929

5932

5930

00.

5931

5863

5864

5862

5861

5828

5827

5825

5826

4733

4736

4732

4737

4707

4706

03 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

7757 राज्य - उड़ीसा

जिला कटक

तहसील - निआलि

प्लाट नं.

गांव का नाम

4705

4570

4569

4571

4524

4525

4523

4521

4522

4514

4515

4517

4518

4516

4414

4413

4412

4411

4365

4361

4362

4363

4364

4366

4369

4370

4181

4371

4374

4375 क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

22 00

17 00

30 00

13 00

94 00

75 00

68 00

30 00

23 00

00 7758

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009 /AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931 [Part Il- Sec. 3( ii) ] तहसील निआलि

जिला कटक

राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

4180

4179

4178

4177

4176

4376

4172

4147

4146

4149

4148

4150

4151

4152

4038

4039

4041

4040

6493

4032

4044

4018

3755

3758

3757

3756

3745

3747

3748

3746

01 7759

दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14, 1931

भारत का राजपत्र

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

राज्य - उड़ीसा

जिला कटक

तहसील - निआलि

प्लाट नं.

गांव का नाम

3749

3738

3723

3728

3729

3727

3724

3725

3726

3730

3734

1502 अमरपडा

1503

1632

1631

1504

1629

1630

1627

1628

1623

1620

1622

1621

1614

1612

1611

1610

1613

1602 क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

5 3

03 00

75 00

61 00

00 7760

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 5 , 2009 / AGRAHAYANA 14. 1931 [ Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] तहसील - निआलि

जिला कटक

राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

1606

1603

1604

1601

1600

1605

1597

1598

1527

1596

1594

1595

1538

1539

1592

1540

1558

1534

1542

1541

1556

1555

1423

1730

1420

1896

1324

1323

1322

1919 7761

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

[ भाग || खण्ड3( ii)]

तहसील - निलि

राज्य - उड़ीसा

जिला

कटक

प्लाट नं.

गांव का नाम

517

518

519

520

521

523

522

528

529

530

531

549

548

547

532

533

534

535

536

538

539

620

622

637

636

635

634

639

641

1888 4233 G1/0912

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

10 00

62 00

94 00

10 00

49 00

12.

21 00

39 00

27 00

15 00

10 00

00 7762

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

तहसील - निआलि

जिला - कटक

राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

640

642

650

643

644

646

645

647

649

648

661-

782

815

816

817

29 दिघि

2959

2960

2955

2963

2938

2925

2924

2923

2921

2922

2920

2919

1307

1308

1310

00 7763 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य - उड़ीसा

जिला - कटक

तहसील - निआलि

क्षेत्रफल

प्लाट नं.

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

1309

1300

1314

1316

1315

859

1294

871

860

870

872

869

868

874

3041

873

876

878

3161

879

880

906

908

907

904

914

915

916

917

913 7764

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5, 2009 /AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931 [Part 11-Sec . 3 (ii) ] तहसील - निआलिः

जिला - कटक

राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

918

923

922

921

925

3043

926

920

3008

978

03.

977

979

981

980

982

1141

986

1119.

3035

987

988

989

990

991

992

1073

1108

1109

1107

1106

00 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

[भाग 1 ]- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

तहसील - निआलि

7765

जिला - कटक

प्लाट नं.

गांव का नाम

1105

1104

1103

1102

1074

1083

1084

1086

1085

1087

1088

1089

4282

बरिसण

4281

4280

5440

4279

5304

3885

3886

3884

3898

3900

3899

3901

3902

3903

3904

3905

3906 राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

64 00

10 00

38 00

64 00

39 00

77 00

22 00

000

283 000

14 00

82. 00

71 00

30 00

10 00

52 00

10 00

86 00

44 00

00 7766

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5, 2009 /AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

तहसील निआलि

जिला कटक गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

3914

3913

3907

3911

3908

5294

3912

3873

3872

3871

3962

3961

3960

3959

3887

3974

3833

3975

3976

3977

3978

3979

3995

3994

3993

3996

3828

3827

3826

3997

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii)] राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 3

5 00

10 00

22 00

07 00

69 00

81 00

10 00

43 00

16 00

27 00

36 7767

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

[ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3(ii) ]

राज्य - उड़ीसा

जिला - कटकं

तहसील - निआलि

प्लाट नं.

गांव का नाम

3998

3999

4011

4000

4010

4009

4003

4004

4007

4008

4015

3811

3810

4045

4049

3809

4054

4055

4056

4053

4052

2966

2967

2976

2975

2965

2968

2969

2972

2971 क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

96 00

03.

54 00

62 00

45 00

24 00

60 00

29 00

84 00

06 00

51 00

52 00

24 00

47 00

25 00

00 7768

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5, 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931 [Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii )] तहसील. निआलि

जिला . कटक

राज्य. उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

2970

2960

2959

2759

2761

2760

2762

2764

2763

2768

2766

2767

2765.

2770

2740

2739

2738

2737

2736

2684

2685

2686

2687

2688

2654

2628

2627

2625

2624

י" [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

7769

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14, 1931

तहसील निआलि

राज्य . उड़ीसा

जिला . कटक

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

2425

2626

2623

2426

2424

2423

2419

2422

2421

2460

2461

2496

2497

2462

547

529 बरगुडिकुद

535

534

849

853

852

858

866

865

867

868

870

388

387

386 4233 G1/09-13

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

00 7770

Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

जिला . कटक

राज्य. उड़ीसा

तहसील निआलि

क्षेत्रफल

प्लाट नं

गांव का नाम

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

383

345

344

347

342

341

348

349

340

350

329

323

324

320

321

318

248

247

252

246

244

242

243

140

100

101

102

122

104

84 7771 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii).]

राज्य उडीसा

जिला

कटक

तहसील निआलि

क्षेत्रफल

प्लाट नं.

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

106

118

117

116

129

112

113

114

130

131

3481

बढिआ साहि

3657

3658

3659

3662

3663

3660

3661

3664

3629

3669

3962

3665

3668

3667

3666

3652

3673

3687

2673

कसरदा 7772

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 5 , 2009 / AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931 [Part II-Sec . 3 (ii)| तहसील - निआलि

जिला कटक

राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

2664

2672

2663

2665

2671

2670

2662

2666

2669

2668

2667

2661

2677

2678

3810

2679

01.

3593

3806

3807

3808

3809

2704

2703

2702

2758

2759

2760

2761

2762

2767

05 7773 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

तहसील - निआलि

जिला

कटक

राज्य - उडीसा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

2768

2789

2787

2770

2771

2774

2786

2785

3576

2790

2791

2792

3728

3644

3203

3202

3201

3200

3199

3197

3192

3193

3188

3189

3168

3169

3172

3171

3170

3138

08 7774

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 5 , 2009 / AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

तहसील - निआलि

जिला - कटक गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

3137

3136

3135

3078

3691

3079

3080

3111

3112

3110

3113

3114

3115

3116

3085

3026

3025

3028

3029

3032

3033

3036

3019

3037

3039

3619

3018

3017

3015

2499

[Part II- Sec . 3 ( ii )] राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 3

с .

01 7675

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 ,, 1931

[ भाग II खण्ड (ii) ]

राज्य - उड़ीसा

जिला कटक

तहसील निआलि

प्लाट नं.

गांव का नाम

2500

1912

3625

1911

1913

1925

1920

1919

1921

1922

1923

2434

2435

2432

2430

2431

2420

2421

2422

2423

2424

2339

1527

खजरा

1475

1476

1443

1477

1442

1445

1446 क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

5 00

70 00

35 00

77 00

35 00

44 00

20 00

10 00

20 00

92 00

77 00

80 00

38 00

00 7776

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

तहसील - निआलि

जिला कटक गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

1447

1266

1265

1264

1263

1262

1261

1259

1258

1257

1256

1255

1251

1250

1246

1244

1243

1242

1241

2402

1240

1239

1238

1237

1236

1235

1217

1222

1232

1231

[Part II- Sec. 3 ( ii ) } राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 3

5 00

23 00

26 00

42 00

20 00

23 00

54 00

57 00

61 00

81 00

56 00

91 00

89 00

97 00

19 00

73 00

26 00

48 00

45 00

28 00

06.

59 00

77 00

05 00

87 00

76 00

25 00

39 00

-02 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7777

जिला - कटक

तहसील - निआलि

प्लाट नं .

गांव का नाम

1230

1229

1228

1227

1225

1223

2387

47 4231 G1/ 09 1.4

राज्य उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

88 00

95 00

00 00

88 00

41 00

24 00

17 00

29 00

62 00

70 00

23 00

58 00

80.

00 7778

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5, 2009 / AGRAHAYANA 14. 1931

तहसील - निआलि

जिला कटक गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

210 कुसुनपुर

208

209

201

207

212

198

205

197

196

192

195

213

236

247

246

245

248

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii )] राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 3

00 7779 भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14, 1931

[ भाग ।।- भ्रूण्ड 3( ii) ]

राज्य - उड़ीसा

जिला कटक

तहसील - निआलि

क्षेत्रफल

प्लाट नं.

गांव का नाम

वर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

5 1

252

253

254

257

256

255

275

276

288

06.

291

290

1226

गोपालनगर

1231

1229

1232

1221

1198

1199

1214

1213

1201

1200

1202

1203

1212

1211

1210

1147

1208

1154 7780

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931 [Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii) ] तहसील - निआलि

जिला - कटक

राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

हेक्टेयर

एयर वर्ग मीटर 1

1155

1161

1162

1163

03.

1140

1131

1132

02.

1128

1136

1088

1086

1087

1089

1091

1092

1090

1094

1095

1096

1097

1034

1035

1099

1026

1025

1027

1024

204

10 भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7781

जिला - कटक

तहसील - निआलि

प्लाट नं.

गांव का नाम

111

112

113

109

108

125

127

107

128

129

130

217

नोदा

216 राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

हेक्टेयर

34 00

08 00

62 00

54 00

74 00

96 00

85 00

64 00

00 7782

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 5 , 2009 / AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

तहसील - निआलि

जिला - कटक गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

215

214

213

173

174

1676

1675

1674

1673

179

180

1671

25 अडसपुर

4025

4024

4029

4646

4647

4607

4606

4605

4601

4604

4602

4603

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर

एयर वर्ग मीटर 3

5 00

99 00

78 00

56 00

35 00

42 00

32 00

31 00

23 00

62 00

75 00

10 7783

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

राज्य - उडीसा

जिला - कटक

तहसील निआलि

प्लाट नं.

गांव का नाम

4536

4537

4542

4543

4541

4540

4534

4535

4538

4533

4532

4531

2745

2746

2748

2749

2750

2751

2752

5105

4471

4470

4469

2756

4468

2757

2758

2780

2779

2778 क्षेत्रफल

वर्ग मीटर हेक्टेयर एयर

58 00

92 00

10 00

97 00

10 00

93 00

02 00

15 00

17 00

51 00

64 00

00 7784

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009 / AGRAHAYANA 14. 1931 [Part 11- Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] तहसील - निआलि

जिला - कटक

राज्य - उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

2777

2791

2776

2790

2792

2789

2793

2795

2788

2796

2794

2797

2808

2807

2806

2559

2560

2558

2360

2359

2358

2356

2357

2364

2319

5101

2318

2329

2313

2312

78 7785 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 ,, 1931

राज्य - उडीसा

तहसील - निआलि

जिला

कटक

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

एयर

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

5 1

2311

2310

2308

2307

2306

2304

2305

2303

2302

2282

2281

2277

2205

2202

2283

2285

2201

2200

2199

2203

2198

2197

2196

2109

2110

2130

2128

2129

2177

2131

4233 G1/ 09--15 7786

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 5 , 2009 / AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

तहसील निआलि

जिला . कटक

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

2 1

2132

2127

2133

2140

2141

5003

2142

2146

2145

2144

2149

2143

663

662

660

661

555 सलेइबेदपुर

557

567

549

548

568

569

571

577

579

576

581

580

532 राज्य. उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर

11 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 ,, 1931

7787 तहसील निआलि

जिला. कटक

राज्य उड़ीसा

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

प्लाट नं.

बर्ग मीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

182

181

180

179

175

174

173

01.

[फा. सं . आर.- 25011/15/2009- ओ.आर.। ]

बी. के. दत्ता , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 23rd November, 2009

S. O. 3283. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transporation of petroleum products from Paradip ( Orissa) to Raipur ( Chhattisgarh ) & Rarichi ( Jharkhand ) , " Paradip New Sambalpur - Raipur - Ranchi Pipeline " should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right ofuser therein;

7788

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DEL EMBER 5, 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931 [Part II--Sec . 3 (ii) ] Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty-one "days from the date on which the copies of this notification , as published in the Gazette ofIndia , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Sukanta Kumar Pradhan, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited , Paradip -New Sambalpur - Raipur- Ranchi Pipeline Project , 1295 , Forest Park, Bhubaneswar - 751009 , (Orissa) .

SCHEDULE

State: ORISSA

Tehsil : NIALI

District: CUTTACK

Area

PlotNO .

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr .

5 1

81 ORAPARA

1043

414

415

416

432

481

480

482

506

505

504

483

479

502

500

494

495

493

484

485

489

490

491

492

488

463

462

292

540

00 7789 भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/ अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

Tehsil : NIALI

State: ORISSA

District: CUTTACK

Plot NO.

Name of the Village

Area Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 1

541

291

542

543

289

290

299

287

270

269

264

265

261

263

262

260

259

255

256

257

251

250

249

235

233

248

236

237

239

232

78 7790

[Part 1--Sor. 3(6 ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14. 1931

State: ORISSA

District: CUTTACK

Tehsil : NIALI

Area

Plot NO.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

5 1

211

231

226

213

225

1064

214

1065

216

215

220

221

222

223

SITHALO

6468

6469

6434

6436

6435

6433

6432

6431

00 .

6430

6722

6391

6392

6393

6394

6395

6347

00 7791 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/ अग्रहायण 14 ,, 1931

[ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State: ORISSA

District: CUTTACK

Tehsil : NIALI

Area

Plot NO.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

6346

6398

6344

6021

6020

6022

6014

6063

6064

5997

5995

5996

5929

5932

5930

5931

5863

5864

5862

5861

5828

5827

5825

5826

4733

4736

4732

4737

4707

4706 7792

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

Tehsil: NIALI

State: ORISSA

District: CUTTACK

Area

PlotNO .

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

4705

4570

4569

4571

4524

4525

4523

4521

4522

4514

4515

4517

4518

4516

4414

4413

4412

4411

4365

4361

4362

4363

4364

4366

4369

4370

4181

4371

4374

4375

00 7793 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

Tehsil: NIALI

State: ORISSA

District: CUTTACK

Area

PlotNO.

Nameof the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

4180

4179

4178

4177

4176

4376

4172

4147

4146

4149

4148

4150

4151

4152

4038

4039

4041

4040

6493

4032

4044

4018

3755

3758

3757

3756

3745

3747

3748

3746

71 1233 G1/ 09--16 7794

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009 / AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931 [Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] Tehsil: NIALI

State : ORISSA

District : CUTTACK

Area

PlotNO .

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr .

3749

3738

3723

3728

3729

3727

3724

3725

3726

3730

3734

1502

61 AMARPARA

1503

1632

1631

1504

1629

1630

1627

1628

1623

1620

1622

1621

1614

1612

1611

1610

1613

1602

01 7795 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

State: ORISSA Tehsil : NIALI

District: CUTTACK

Area

PlotNO.

Name of the Village

Are Sq.mtr.

Hectare

1606

1603

1604

1601

1600

1605

1597

1598

1527

1596

1594

1595

1538

1539

1592

1540

1558

1534

1542

1541

1556

1555

1423

1730

1420

1896

1324

1323

1322

1919

00 7796

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5, 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14. 1931 [ Part 11 -Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] Tehsil: NIALI

District: CUTTACK

State: ORISSA

Area

PlotNO.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr .

517

518

519

520

521

523

522

528

529

530

531

549

548

547

532

533

534

535

536

538

539

620

622

637

636

635

634

639

641

1888

30 7797 भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 5, 2009 /अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

District: CUTTACK

State: ORISSA Tehsil: NIALI

Area

PlotNO.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

5 1

640

642

650

643

644

646

645

647

649

648

661

782

815

816

817

2959

DIGHI

2960

2955

01.

2963

2938

2925

2924

2923

2921

2922

2920

2919

1307

1308

1310 7798

[Part II-Sec . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 5, 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

District: CUTTACK Tehsil : NIALI

PlotNO .

Name of the Village

2 1

1309

1300

1314

1316

1315

859

1294

871

860

870

872

869

868

874

3041

873

876

878

3161

879

880

906

908

907

904

914

915

916

917

913 State: ORISSA

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr .

50 00

15 00

81 00

12 00

10 00

76 00

40 00

42 00

82 00

44 00

79 00

43 00

28 00

10 00

04 00

01 7799 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

State: ORISSA

District: CUTTACK

Tehsil : NIALI

Area

Plot NO .

Nameof the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

918

923

922

921

925

3043

926

920

3008

978

977

979

981

980

982

1141

986

1119

3035

987

03.

988

989

990

991

992

1073

1108

1109

1107

1106 7800

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009 /AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931 [Part II-Sec. 3 (ii)} Tehsil : NIALI

District: CUTTACK

State : ORISSA

Area

PlotNO .

Nameof the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1

1105

1104

1103

1102

1074

1083

1084

1086

1085

1087

1088

1089

22 BARISAN

4282

4281

4280

5440

4279

5304

3885

3886

3884

3898

3900

3899

3901

3902

01.

3903

3904

3905

3906

52 7801 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

State : ORISSA

District: CUTTACK

Tehsil : NIALI

Area

PlotNO.

Nameof the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

3914

3913

3907

3911

3908

5294

3912

3873.

3872

3871

3962

3961

3960

3959

3887

3974

3833

3975

3976

3977

3978

3979

3995

3994

3993

3996

3828

3827

3826

3997

4233 G1/09-17 7802

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009 / AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931 [Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] Tehsil : NIALI

District: CUTTACK

State: ORISSA

Area

PlotNO.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr .

3998

3999

4011

4000

4010

4009

4003

4004

4007

02.

4008

4015

3811

3810

4045

4049

3809

4054

4055

4056

4053

4052

2966

2967

2976

2975

2965

2968

2969

2972

2971

1 7803 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

State : ORISSA

Tehsil : NIALI

District: CUTTACK

Area

PlotNO.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

2970

2960

2959

2759

2761

2760

2762

2764

2763

2768

2766

2767

2765

2770

2740

2739

2738

2737

2736

2684

2685

2686

2687

2688

2654

2628

2627

02.

2625

2624 7804

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DEMBER 5, 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931 [Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] Tehsil : NIALI

State: ORISSA

District: CUTTACK

Area

PlotNO.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 1

2425

2626

2623

2426

2424

2423

2419

2422

2421

2460

2461

2496

2497

2462

547

BARAGURIKUD

529

535

534

849

853

852

858

866

865

867

868

870

388

387

386

00 7805 [भांग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14, 1931

State : ORISSA

Tehsil : NIALI

District : CUTTACK

Area

PlotNO.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

383

345

344

347

342

341

348

349

340

350

329

323

324

320

321

318

248

247

252

246

244

242

243

140

100

101

102

122

104 7806

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 5, 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931 [Part II- Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] Tehsil : NIALI

District: CUTTACK

State: ORISSA

Area

PlotNO.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 1

106

118

117

116

129

112

113

114

130

131

BARHIASAHI

3481

3657

61.

3658

3659

3662

3663

3660

3661

3664

3629

3669

3962

3665

3668

3667

3666

3652

3673

3687

2673

33 KASARADA

19 7807 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/ अग्रहायण 14 ,, 1931

State : ORISSA

District: CUTTACK

Tehsil: NIALI

Area

PlotNO.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

5 1

2664

2672

2663

2665

2671

2670

2662

2666

2669

2668

2667

2661

2677

2678

3810

2679

3593

3806

3807

3808

3809

2704

2703

2702

2758

2759

2760

2761

2762

2767

05 7808

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 5 , 2009 /AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

Tehsil : NIALI

District: CUTTACK

Plot NO. Nameof the Village

2768

2789

2787

2770

2771

2774

2786

2785

3576

2790

2791

2792

3728

3644

3203

3202

3201

3200

3199

3197

3192

3193

3188

3189

3168

3169

3172

3171

3170

3138

[Part II Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] State: ORISSA

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 3

5 00

66 00

53 00

24 00

12 00

76 00

22 00

23 00

87 00

82 00

04 00

91 00

61 00

91 00

70 00

18 00

77 00

58 00

52 00

70 00

94 00

43 00

08 780

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/ अग्रहायण 14, 1931

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

State: ORISSA

District : CUTTACK

Tehsil : NIALI

Area

PlotNO.

Nameof the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

3137

3136

3135

3078

3691

3079

3080

3111

3112

3110

3113

3114

3115

3116

3085

3026

3025

3028

3029

3032

3033

3036

3019

3037

3039

3619

3018

3017

3015

2499

4233 G1/ 09 18 7810

[ Part 11--Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009 /AGRAHAYANA 14. 1931

Tehsil : NIALI

District: CUTTACK

State : ORISSA

Area

Plot NO .

Name of the Village

Hectare

Are Sq.mtr. 1

2500

1912

3625

1911

1913

1925

1920

1919

1921

1922

1923

2434

2435

2432

2430

2431

2420

2421

2422

2423

2424

2339

75 KHAJRA

1527

1475

1476

1443

1477

1442

1445

1446

10 7811 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009 /अग्रहायण 14 ,, 1931

Tehsil : NIALI

District: CUTTACK

State : ORISSA

PlotNO .

Name of the Village

Area Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr .

1447

1266

1265

1264

1263

1262

1261

1259

1258

1257

1256

1255

1251

97.

1250

1246

1244

1243

1242

1241

2402

1240

1239

1238

1237

1236

1235

1217

1222

1232

1231

02 7812

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA DE CEMBER 5, 2009 / AGRAHAYANA 14. 1931

Tehsil: NIALI

CUTTACK

District:

PlotNO.

Name of the Village

1230

1229

1228

1227

1225

1223

2387

[Part 11-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] State: ORISSA

Area

Hectare Are Sq.mtr. 3

5 00

03 00

88 00

07 00

95 00

17 00

62 00

34 00

10 00

73 00

36 00

23 00

58 00

92 00

78 00

39 00

80 00

37 00

10 00

60.

10 [ भाग II- खण्ड (ii ) ]

7813

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 ,, 1931

Tehsil : NIALI

District: CUTTACK

PlotNO.

Name of the Village

30 KUSUNPUR

210

208

209

201

207

212

198

205

197

196

192

195

213

236

247

246

245

248 State : ORISSA

Area

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

5 00

36 00

82 00

88 00

82 00

02 00

09 00

31 00

84 00

10 00

12 00

75 00

10 00

87 00

20 00

52 00

07 00

62 00

72 00

30 00

27 00

15 00

14 00

31 00

64 7814

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 5 , 2009 / AGRAHAYANA 14. 1931

Tehsil : NIALI

District: CUTTACK

State : ORISSA

Area

PlotNO.

Name of the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr.

5 1

252

253

254

257

256

255

275

276

288

291

200

GOPALNAGAR

1226

1231

1229

1232

1221

1198

1199

1214

1213

1201

1200

1202

1203

1212

1211

1210

1147

1208

1154 [ भाग ।। - खण्ड3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 ,, 1931

7815 Tehsil: NIALI

State: ORISSA

District : CUTTACK

Area

PlotNO .

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr .

1155

1161

1162

1163

1140

1131

1132

1128

1136

1088

1086

1087

1089

1091

1092

1090

1094

1095

1096

1097

1034

1035

1099

1026

1025

1027

1024

204

10 7816

[Part II-Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 5, 2009 / AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

State: ORISSA Tehsil : NIALI

District: CUTTACK

Area

PlotNO .

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

111

112

113

109

108

125

127

107

128

129

130

217

NODA

216

68 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

7817 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

Tehsil : NIALI

District: CUTTACK

State : ORISSA

Area

Plot NO.

Name of the Viliage

Hectare

Are Sq.mtr . 1 1

215

214

213

173

174

1676

1675

1674

1673

179

180

1671

21 ARASPUR

4025

4024

4029

4646

4647

4607

460€

4605

1,4

4601

4604

4602

4603

4253 G1/09-19 7818

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5, 2009 /AGRAHAYAΝΑ 14, 1931 [Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii) ] Tehsil : NIALI

District: CUTTACK

State ORISSA

Area

Plot NO .

Nameof the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr. 1

4536

4537

4542

4543

4541

4540

4534

4535

4538

4533

4532

4531

2745

2746

2748

2749

2750

2751

2752

5105

4471

4470

4469

2756

4468

2757

2758

2780

2779

2778

35 7819 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 ,, 1931

Tehsil : NIALI

District: CUTTACK

State: ORISSA

Area

PlotNO.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Sq.mtr .

2777

2791

2776

2790

2792

2789

2793

2795

2788

2796

2794

2797

2808

2807

2806

2559

2560

2558

2360

2359

2358

2356

2357

2364

2319

5101

2318

2329

2313

00 .

2312 Gadh

INDIA DECEMRE 2009 AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

[Part 11-Sec. 3 ( 1 ) ] Tensil : N'ALI

State : ORISSA

District : CUTTACK

Area

PlotNO

Hectare Are Sq.mtr.

2311

23: 0

2308

2307

2:06

2304

2363

2303

2302

2282

2281

2277

2205

2202

2283

2285

2201

2200

2199

2203

2198

2197

2196

2109

2110

2130

2128

2129

2177

2131

1011 7821 [ भाग II- खण्ड3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

= Tehsil : NIALI

District : CUTTACK

State: ORISSA

Plot NO .

Name of the Village

Hectare

Area Are Sq.mtr. 1

2132

2127

2133

2140

2141

5003

2142

2146

2145

2144

2149

2143

663

662

660

661

555

SALEIBEDPUR

557

567

549

548

568

569

571

577

579

576

581

580

532

11 7822

[Part II -Sec . 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DE CEMBER 5, 2009 / AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

Tehsil : NIALI

State: ORISSA

District: CUTTACK

Area

PlotNO.

Nameof the Village

Are

Hectare

Sq.mtr .

182

181

180

179

175

174

173

[ F. No. R- 25011/15/ 2009 -O.R. - I ]

B.K.DATTA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 4 दिसम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 3284.- पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50 ) के नियम 2 (क) के अन्तर्गत , मैसर्स रिलायंस गैस ट्रान्सपोर्टेशन इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड (आर.जी.टी. आई.एल. ) के द्वारा महाराष्ट्र राज्य में प्राकृतिक गैस पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने हेतु सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कार्यों का निर्वहन करने के लिए , भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की, भारत के राजपत्र दिनांक 22 जनवरी , 2005 को प्रकाशित , अधिसूचना का०आ० 259 दिनांक18 जनवरी, 2005 द्वारा पदस्थापित, मैं , एस.डी.भिसे, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) नियमावली ,1963 के नियम 4 के उप नियम ( 1 ) के नीचे दी गई व्याख्या ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत अधिकारों के अनुपालन में, मैसर्स आ.जी.टी.आई.एल. , जिसमें यथास्थित , उस क्षेत्र में भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार निहित किया गया है और उस क्षेत्र में पाइपलाइन का स्वामित्व निहित है, के परामर्श से, सलग्नं अनुसूची के स्तंभ 4 में महाराष्ट्र राज्य के पुणे , अहमदनगर और रायगड जिले में यथा उल्लेखित प्राकृतिक गैस पाइपलाइन विछाए जाने के प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीखों की घोपणा करता हूँ । 7823 19. भारत का राजपत्र: दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

तहसिलः खेड

ग्राम का नाम

क्र. स.

1 पिंपरीखुर्द

1606 1333(अ) 2 गोणवडी

1606 1333(अ) 3 आंबेठाण

1606 1055 1333(अ) 4 असग्ब्रेड खुर्द

1606 1333(अ)

तहसिल: मावळ

1 आंबळे

1606 1333(अ) 2 निगडे

1606 1333(अ) 3 पोवळेवाडी

1606 1055 1333(अ)

1606 4 कल्हाट

1333(अ)

1606 5 भोयरे

1606 6 किवळे

1333(अ)

1606 7 मालेगाव खुर्द

1333(अ)

1606 8 पिंपरीवाडी

1333(अ) 9 मालेगांव बुदुक

1606 1055

1333(अ)

तहसिल: शिरूर

2322 1 आंधळगाव

1188(अ)

2322 2 आलेगाव पागा

1188(अ) 3 पारोडी

2322 1056

1188(अ) 4 शिवतक्रार म्हाळुंगी

2322 1056

1188(अ)

2322 5 पिंपळेजगताप

1188(अ) अनुसूची

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला: पुणे

प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख

धारा 6 (1 ) की का. आ . संख्या एवं दिनांक

30/05/2009

27/04/2005

दिनांक

22/05/2009

दिनांक

30/05/2009

27/04/2005

22/05/2009

दिनांक दिनांक

30/05/2009

27/04/2005

दिनांक

09/04/2007

दिनांक

22/05/2009

दिनांक

30/05/2009

27/04/2005

दिनांक

22/05/2009

राज्यः महाराष्ट्र

जिला: पुणे

27/04/2005

30/05/2009

22/05/2009

दिनांक दिनांक

27/04/2005

30/05/2009

दिनांक

22/05/2009

दिनांक

27/04/2005

30/05/2009

दिनांक

09/04/2007

22/05/2009

दिनांक

27/04/2005

30/05/2009

दिनांक

दिनांक 22/05/2009

27/04/2005

दिनांक

30/05/2009

27/04/2005

30/05/2009

दिनांक

22/05/2009

दिनांक

30/05/2009

27/04/2005

दिनांक

22/05/2009

दिनांक

30/05/2009

दिनांक

27/04/2005

22/05/2009

दिनांक

30/05/2009

27/04/2005

दिनांक

09/04/2007

22/05/2009

दिनांक

राज्यः महाराष्ट्र

जिला: पुणे

27/06/2005

30/05/2009

दिनांक

06/05/2009

दिनांक

30/05/2009

27/06/2005

दिनांक

06/05/2009

दिनांक

30/05/2009

27/06/2005

दिनांक

09/04/2007

दिनांक

06/05/2009

दिनांक

30/05/2009

27/06/2005

दिनांक

09/04/2007

दिनांक

06/05/2009

दिनांक

30/05/2009

27/06/2005

दिनांक

06/05/2009

दिनांक 7824

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009 /AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931 [Part II-Sec . 3 (ii ) ] 1

तहसिल:श्रीगोंदा

जिला: अहमदनगर

राज्यः महाराष्ट्र

2236

21/06/2005

1 चोराचीवाडी

30/05/2009

दिनांक दिनांक

05/05/2009

1186(अ)

दिनांक

2236

21/06/2005

30/05/2009

2 वेळू

दिनांक

05/05/2009

1186(अ)

तहसिल: कर्जत

जिला: रायगड

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

21/06/2005

30/05/2009

1 खड्याचापाडा

दिनांक दिनांक

06/05/2009

2237 1187(अ)

पट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962की धारा 17 के अंर्तगत संरचित पट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) नियम, 1963 के नियम 4 के अंर्तगत भारत सरकार के राजपत्र के प्रकाशनार्थ.

[फा. सं. एल-14014/43/2009 जी.पी. |

के.के . शर्मा, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 4th December, 2009

S. O. 3284- In pursuance of powers conferred by Explanation 1 in sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Rules , 1963 , I , S. D. Bhise , appointed by Government of India , Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas vide Notification S.O. 259 dated 18th January , 2005 (published in the Gazette of India on 22nd January , 2005) under Section 2( a ) of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) to perform the functions of Competent Authority for laying natural gas pipelines by M/ s Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited ( RGTIL) in the State of Maharashtra , in consultation with M / s RGTIL , to whom the Right of User in land Ba that area has been vested and in whom the ownership of pipeline in that area vests , hereby declare the dates , mentioned in Column 4 of the Schedule annexed herewith , as the dates of termination of RoU operation in Districts Pune , Ahmednagar and Raigad in the State of Maharashtra .

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7825

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/ अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

Schedule

Tahsil: Khed

Village

Sr. No.

1606 1 Pimpari Khurd

1333(E)

1606 2 Gaonwadi

1333(E) 3 Ambethan

1606 1055

1333(E)

1606 4 Ashked Khurd

1333(E)

Tahsil : Maval

1606 1 Ambale

1333(E)

1606 2Nigade

1333(E) 3 Powalewadi

1606 1055

1333(E)

1606 4 Kalhat

1333(E)

1606 5 Bhoyare

1606 6 Kivale

1333(E)

1606 7 Malegaon Khurd

1333(E)

1606 8 Pimpriwadi

1333(E)

1606 9 MalegaonBudruk

1055

1333(E)

Tahsil : Shirur

2322 1 Andhalgaon

1188(E)

2322 2 Aalegaon Paga

1188(E) 4233 G1/09-20

District : Pune

State: Maharashtra

Dateof Termination of Operation

S.O. No. & Date of Notification Under sub-section (1 ) of Section 6

27/04/2005

30/05/2009

Date

22/05/2009

Date

30/05/2009

Date 27/04/2005

22/05/2009

Date

30/05/2009

27/04/2005

Date

09/04/2007

Date

22/05/2009

Date

27/04/2005

30/05/2009

Date

22/05/2009

Date

State: Maharashtra

District: Pune

27/04/2005

30/05/2009

Date

22/05/2009

Date

30/05/2009

27/04/2005

Date

22/05/2009

Date

27/04/2005

30/05/2009

Date

09/04/2007

Date

22/05/2009

Date

30/05/2009

27/04/2005

Date

22/05/2009

Date

27/04/2005

Date

30/05/2009

27/04/2005

Date

22/05/2009

Date

30/05/2009

27/04/2005

Date

22/05/2009

27/04/2005

Date

30/05/2009

22/05/2009

Date

30/05/2009

27/04/2005

Date

09/04/2007

Date

22/05/2009

Date

District: Pune

State: Maharashtra

30/05/2009

27/06/2005

Date

06/05/2009

Date

30/05/2009

27/06/2005

Date

Date 06/05/2009 7826

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14. 1931

3 Parodi

2322 1056

1188(E) 4 Shivtakrar Mhalungi

2322 1056

1188(E)

2322 5 PimpleJagtap

1188(E)

Tahsil : Shrigonda

1 Chorachiwadi

2236 1186(E) 2Velu

2236 1186(E)

Tahsil: Karjat

1 Khadich pada

2237 1187(E)

Part 11-Sec . 3 ( i ) | 3

Date

27/06/2005

30/05/2009

Date 09/04/2007

Date 06/05/2009

Date

30/05/2009

27/06/2005

09/04/2007

Date

06/05/2009

27/06/2005

30/05/2009

Date

06/05/2009

State: Maharashtra

District: Ahmednagar

21/06/2005

30/05/2009

Date

05/05/2009

Date

30/05/2009

21/06/2005

Date 05/05/2009

State: Maharashtra

District: Raigad

Date

21/06/2005

30/05/2009

06/05/2009

Date

To be published under Rule 4 of the P & MP ( ARUL)

Rules1963 ,framed under Section 17 of P & MP (ARUL) Act, 1962in official Gazette of India .

[F. No. L -14014/43/2009-G.P. ] K.K.SHARMA , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 4 दिसम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 3285.- पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) के नियम 2 (क ) के अन्तर्गत , मैसर्स रिलायंस गैस ट्रान्सपोर्टेशन इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड (आर.जी.टी. आई.एल. ) के द्वारा महाराष्ट्र राज्य में प्राकृतिक गैस पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने हेतु सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कार्यो का निर्वहन करने के लिए, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की , भारत के राजपत्र दिनांक 22 जनवरी , 2005 को प्रकाशित, अधिसूचना का ० आ ० 259 दिनांक 18 जनवरी, 2005 द्वारा प्राधिकृत, मैं , डी. एस . धोत्रे, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) नियमावली , 1963 के नियम 4 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के नीचे दी गई व्याख्या ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत अधिकारों के अनुपालन में , मैसर्स आ.जी.टी.आई.एल. , जिसमें यथास्थित, उस क्षेत्र में भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार निहित किया गया है और उस क्षेत्र में पाइपलाइन का स्वामित्व निहित है, के परामर्श से , सलग्न अनुसूची के स्तंभ 4 में महाराष्ट्र राज्य के लातुर और उस्मानावाद जिले में यथा उल्लेखित प्राकृतिक गैस पाइपलाइन विछाए जाने के प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीखों की घोषणा करता हूँ ।

HT [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

7827

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

तहसिलः निलंगा

अनुसूची

जिला: लातुर

ग्राम का नाम

क्र. स.

हलाळी

1301

2695 2904(अ) 2

मिरगनहळळी

1301 2695 2904(अ) 3

शिराढोण

1301 2904(अ) 4

हसोरी(बु)

1301 2695 2904(अ) 5

कासार-सिरसी

1301 2695 2904(अ) 6

डोंगरगांव (हालीखेड) 1301 2695 2904(अ) तहसिलः औसा

राज्यः महाराष्ट्र

प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख

धारा 6( 1 ) की का . आ . संख्या एवं दिनांक

08/04/2005

दिनांक

15/12/2008

20/09/2007

दिनांक

06/12/2008

06/04/2005

दिनांक

15/12/2008

20/09/2007

दिनांक दिनांक

06/12/2008

08/04/2005

15/12/2008

06/12/2008

दिनांक दिनांक

दिनांक

15/12/2008

08/04/2005 20/09/2007 06/12/2008

दिनांक दिनांक

06/04/2005

15/12/2008

दिनांक

20/09/2007

दिनांक

06/12/2008

दिनांक

08/04/2005

दिनांक

15/12/2008

20/09/2007

दिनांक

06/12/2008

दिनांक

जिला: लातुर

मंगरूळ

1301 4828 2695 2

1301

गुबाळ

2695 3

1301

नांदुर्गा

सारणी

1301 4828 5

1301

हसलगन

1301

लोहाटा

2695 7

आशीव

1301 4828 2695 तहसिलः उमरगा

राज्यः महाराष्ट्र

08/04/2005

दिनांक

30/09/2007

दिनांक

11/12/2006

20/09/2007

दिनांक

29/05/2008

08/04/2005

दिनांक

20/09/2007

दिनांक

08/04/2005

10/06/2007

08/04/2005

27/06/2007

दिनांक

11/12/2006

दिनांक

08/04/2005

दिनांक

17/06/2007

30/09/2007

दिनांक

08/04/2005

दिनांक

20/09/2007

08/04/2005

30/09/2007

11/12/2006

20/09/2007

दिनांक दिनांक दिनांक

जिला: उस्मानाबाद

चाकुर

1301 4828

राज्यः महाराष्ट्र

30/04/2009

दिनांक

08/04/2005 11/12/2006 7828

[Part II-Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 5, 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

2695

दिनांक चाकुर (निरंतर)

दिनांक

2904(अ) 871

दिनांक

20/09/2007

30/04/2009

06/12/2008

06/04/2009

जिला: उस्मानाबाद

तहसिलः लोहारा

1301

दिनांक

सास्तुर

4828

दिनांक

2695

दिनांक

2904(अ) तहसिल: उस्मानाबाद

राज्यः महाराष्ट्र

15/12/2008

08/04/2005

11/12/2006

20/09/2007

06/12/2008

जिला: उस्मानाबाद

1301

दिनांक

भंडारी

दिनांक

2695 2904(अ) 2

दिनांक

वरमगाव(खुर्द)

1301 2695

दिनांक

1301

दिनांक

उत्तमी

1301

दिनांक

पळसवाडी

दिनांक

2695 2904(अ) 5

दिनांक

खानापूर

दिनांक

1301 2695 2904(अ)

दिनांक

वेजवळगे

दिनांक

1301 2695 2904(अ)

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

15/12/2008

08/04/2005

20/09/2007

06/12/2008

30/09/2007

08/04/2005

20/09/2007

08/04/2005

20/05/2007

15/12/2008

08/04/2005

20/09/2007

06/12/2008

15/12/2008

08/04/2005

20/09/2007

06/12/2008

15/12/2008

08/04/2005

20/09/2007

06/12/2008

पट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन)

अधिनियम, १ ९ ६२की धारा १७ के अंर्तगत संरचित पट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) नियम , १९ ६३ के नियम ४ के अंर्तगत भारत सरकार के राजपत्र के प्रकाशनार्थ

[फा. सं. एल 14014/46/2009 जी.पी. ।

के.के. शर्मा, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 4th December, 2009

S. O. 3285.- In pursuance of powers conferred by Explanation 1 in sub -rule ( 1 ) of Rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Rules , 1963 , I, D.S. Dhotre , authorised by Government of India, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas vide Notification S.O. 259 dated 18th January , 2005 (published in the Gazette of India on 22nd January, 2005) under Section 2(a) of the

小 7829

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14,, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) to perform the functions of Competent Authority for laying natural gas pipelines by M/ s Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited (RGTIL) in the State of Maharashtra , in consultation with M/ s RGTIL , to whom the Right of User in land in that area has been vested and in whom the ownership of pipeline in that area vests , hereby declare the dates , mentioned in Column 4 of the Schedule annexed herewith , as the dates of termination of RoU operation in Districts Latur and Osmanabad in the State of Maharashtra .

Schedule

District: Latur

Tahsil : Nilanga

Village

Sr. No.

Halali

1301 2695 2904(E) 2

Mirganhalli

1301 2695 2904(E) 3

Shiradhon

1301 2904(E) 4

Hasori (Bk)

1301 2695 2904(E) 5

1301

Kasar-Sirsi

2695 2904(E) 6

1301 Dongargaon ( Halikhed)

2695

2904( E)

State: Maharashtra

Date of Termination of Operation

S.O. No. & Date of Notification Under sub-section ( 1) of Section 6

Date

08/04/2005

15/12/2008

20/09/2007

Date

06/12/2008

Date

08/04/2005

15/12/2008

20/09/2007

Date

06/12/2008

Date

15/12/2008

08/04/2005

06/12/2008

Date

15/12/2008

08/04/2005

Date

20/09/2007

Date

06/12/2008

08/04/2005

15/12/2008

Date

20/09/2007

Date

06/12/2008

Date

15/12/2008

08/04/2005

20/09/2007

Date

06/12/2008

Date

District: Latur

Tahsil : Ausa

1301

Mangrul

4828

2695

1301 2

Gubal

2695

1301 3

Nandurga

State: Maharashtra

30/09/2007

08/04/2005

Date

11/12/2006

Date

20/09/2007

Date

08/04/2005

29/05/2008

20/09/2007

Date

08/04/2005

10/06/2007

Date 7830

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5, 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14. 1931

Sami

1301

4828 5

1301

Hasalgan

Lohata

1301

2695 7

Ashiv

1301

4828

2695 Tahsil : Umarga

Chakur

1301

4828

2695 Chakur(Cont'd)

2904(E)

871 Tahsil : Lohara

1301

Sastur

4828

2695

2904( E) Tahsil : Osmanabad

1301 1

Bhandari

2695

2904(E) 2

1301 Baramgaon( Kh)

2695 3

1301

Uttami

Palaswadi

1301

2695

2904(E) 5

1301

Khanapur

2695

2904(E) 6

1301 Ambejawalge

2695

2904( E)

[ Part 11 -Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] 3

Date

27/06/2007

08/04/2005

11/12/2006

Date

08/04/2005

17/06/2007

Date

08/04/2005

30/09/2007

Date

20/09/2007

Date

08/04/2005

30/09/2007

Date

11/12/2006

20/09/2007

Date

District: Osmanabad

State: Maharashtra Date

08/04/2005

30/04/2009 Date

11/12/2006

Date

30/04/2009

20/09/2007

06/12/2008

Date

06/04/2009

District: Osmanabad

State: Maharashtra Date

08/04/2005

15/12/2008

11/12/2006

Date

20/09/2007

Date

06/12/2008

District: Osmanabad

State: Maharashtra

15/12/2008

Date

08/04/2005

20/09/2007

Date

06/12/2008

Date

08/04/2005

30/09/2007

Date

20/09/2007

Date

08/04/2005

20/05/2007

08/04/2005

15/12/2008

Date

20/09/2007

Date

06/12/2008

Date

15/12/2008

08/04/2005

Date

20/09/2007

Date

06/12/2008

Date

08/04/2005

15/12/2008

Date

20/09/2007

Date

06/12/2008

To be published under Ruie 4 of the P& MP (ARUL) Rules1963 , framed under Section 17 of P& MP (ARUL ) Act, 1962 in official Gazette of India .

[F. No. L -14014/46/2009-G.P. ]

K.K.SHARMA , Under Secy .

7831 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

case and the then Tribunal proceeded the reference exparte against him on 26-11-06 .

श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 5 नवम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 3286.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 59/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल -12012/152/98- आई आर. ( बी-1 ) ]

अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi , the 5th November, 2009

S. O. 3286.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.59/ 99 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of State Bank of India and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 5-11-2009 .

[No. L-12012/152/98 - IR ( B - 1 ) ]

AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/ R/ 59/99

Presiding Officer : Shri Mohd . Shakir Hasan

3. The management filed Written Statement in the case. The case of the management is that the workman Shri KuldeepMinj was working as clerk - cum - cashier in the State Bank of India at Bhanpuri Branch . While he was working there, he misconducted and mis - appropriated the amount deposited by the account holders . He is saidto have fraudulently made entries in the pass books of the account holders and also did posting in the ledger . The chargesheet was served on himby the Disciplinary authority and Shri C.R.Baboo , Chief Manager was appointed as Enquiry Officer . Shri R.K.Bisen , Dy .Manager was appointed as Presenting Officer . The departmental enquirywas held on different dates . The workman appeared and defended himself and full opportunity was given to him. Later on 7-12-95 the workman / delinquent boycotted the proceedings and left the place of enquiry . Again the workman and the defence counsel appeared and participated in the proceedings . The Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry after following the principle of natural justicc . The Enquiry Officer found the charges proved and submitted enquiry report . The Disciplinary Officer gave second show cause notice proposing the punishment of removal from service . The workman was givenpersonal hearing on 16-6-97. Considering the entire materials , the disciplinary authority imposed the punishment of removal from service. The workman preferred appeal against the order of removal from service . The Appellate authority also gave an opportunity to the workmanofpersonal hearing . The appellate Authority also found the gravity of misconduct proveo against the workman and rejected the appeal . Under the circumstances , it is submitted that the workman/Union is not entitled to any relief.

4. Now the only question is as to whether the order ofthe management in removing the workman Shri Kuldeep Minj from service is legal and justified ?

.... Workman/Union

The Regional Secretary, State Bank of India Workmen Union , Regional Office, Region IV , Dharampura , Jagdalpur , Distt . Bastar ( U. P. )

Versus

The Asstt . General Manager ,

....Management

State Bank of India , Regional Office, Region IV, Dharampura, Jagdalpur,

AWARD

Passed on this 23rd day of October , 2009

1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No.L- 12012/ 152/98/ IR ( B- 1 ) dated 13-1-1999 has referred the following dispute for adjudicaion by this Tribunal :

"Whether the order of the management of State Bank of India, Region IV , Dharampur , Jagdalpur in removing the workman Shri Kuldeep Minj from service is legal andjustified? If not, to what relief he is entitled?

5. The management has adduced oral and documentary evidence in the case . The management witness K.Lakshmana Rao is Asstt. General Manager in the State Bank of India . He has stated that the workman Shri Kuldeep Minj was clerk- cum- cashier in the State Bank of India ( in short SBI ) at Bhanpuri Branch and he had misappropriated the amount deposited by the customers and had not deposited the same in the account of the Bank . He has stated that the charge sheet was served on him which is marked as Exhibit M / I but the workman denied the charges . The Enquiry Offieer and Presenting Officer were appointed . The workman engaged Shri Abhilash Dave as his defence counsel . This witness has supported the case that the enquiry was conducted and full opportunity was given to the workman to defend himself . The enquiry proceedings including documents and evidence of the witnesses are marked as Exhibit M/5 . The Enquiry Officer after enquiry found that the charges were proved against the workman and submitted his enquiry report which is marked as Exhibit M/6.

2. The workman /Union appeared in the case on 10-11-99 but inspite of sufficient time granted to him, he did not file statement of claim in the case . Lastly he left the 7832

[PART I-SFC . 3 ( ii) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

6. He has further stated that the Disciplinary Authority after giving opportunity to the workman of personal hearing found that the charges were proved and the same were of serious nature . As such , the Disciplinary Authority passed an order of removal from the service . The said order is marked as Exhibit M / 10 . The workman preferred appeal . The memo of appeal is marked as Exhibit M/ 11 . The appellate Authority after personal hearing rejected the appeal . The order is marked as Exhibit M / 11 . There is nothing on the record to rebut the evidence ofthe management . I do not find any illegality in the departmental proceedings and any interference in order appears to be not required. Accordingly the reference is answered in favour of the management .

7. In the result, the award is passed exparte without any orders of costs .

8. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules .

MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 3287.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार रेलवे बोर्ड प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण -1 , दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 36/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [ सं. एल-41011/7/2005 - आई आर. ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 5th November, 2009 S. O. 3287. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 36/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court - 1 , Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute hetween the management of Railway Board and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 5-11-2009 .

[No. L-41011 /7 /2005 - IR (B - I ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURTNO . 1 , NEW DELHI , KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI I. D. No. 36/2007

Sh . U. R. Kansavi ,

Through The Secretary General , All India Station Masters Association , 28/23 , Kishan Ganj , Railway Colony,

....Workman Delhi- 11007 .

Versus

The Chairman , RailwayBoard, Rail Bhawan, NewDelhi .

....Management

AWARD

The appropriate Government vide its Order No. ' L-41011/ 7/2005 / IR (B - 1 ) dated 7-3-2007 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudicaion :

"Whether the action of the management of Railway Board in imposing the penalty of reduction from the scale of Rs . 2000-3200 ( RSRP ) to Rs . 1600-2660 and fixing pay of Shri U. R. Kansavi at Rs . 1600 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workmen is entitled to ? " and ' Whether the action of the management of Railway Board in imposing 10% cut in pension for a period of one year on Shri D. P. Trevedi , Retd. Dy . Station Supdt./Hapa is legal and justified ? Ifnot, to what relief the workmen is entitled to ?"

2. The appropriate Government gave a direction that the parties raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents , list of reliance and witness with the Tribunal within fifteen days of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy of such a statement to each one of the opposite parties involved in this dispute under rule 10 (B ) of the industrial disputes (Central ), Rules , 1957. Despite that direction, the workman failed to file his claim statement.

3.On receipt of reference by this Tribunal , notices were issued to the parties , calling upon them to file claim statement and document on 12-6-2007 . On 12-6-2007 non appeared for the workman and Shri Neeraj Kumar appeared for the management and case was adjoumed to 22-8-09 for filling of claim . From 22-8-09 about 17 adjournment were granted to the workman for filling calim but none appeared for the workman . Neeraj Kumar A/ R for the management was called upon to submit the stand of the management . He submitted that the workman was posted at Hapa Railway Station which falls within the jurisdiction of Western Railway . According to him management is not in position to furnish any detail as to the employment or penality imposed on the workman . Thus it is evident that either of the parties could not furnish the details of the matter , in which penality was imposed on the workman .

4. The workman opted not to file a claim statement in the matter despite various opportunities . In view of the above circumstances a No Dispute Award is passed. It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication .

DR . R. K. YADAV , Presiding Officer Date: 09-09-2009

नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 3288. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , [ भाग 11-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय , कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 42/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल -12012/63/2007-आई आर. ( बी 1 ) ]

7833

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/ अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

ofRs . 350 and now Rs. 500 and by way of TA bills etc. , and not paying salary at the prescribed rate . Action of the bank management keeping him on daily wage basis continuously for more than 13 years is unfair and unjustified and amounts to unfair labour practice .

अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 5th November , 2009 S. O. 3288.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.42/2007) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court , Kanpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of State Bank of India and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 5-11-2009 .

5. He has therefore , prayed that the opposite party bedirected to regularize him with continuity of service and arrears of difference of wages and other benefits to be provided.

[No. L- 12012/63/2007 - IR (B - 1 ) ]

AJAY KUMAR , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, SHRAM BHAWAN , ATI CAMPUS, UDYOG NAGAR, KANPUR

Industrial Dispute No. 42 of2007

Inthe matter ofdispute between- The Joint Secretary ,

National Confederation of Bank Employees , 2/263 Namneir, Agra.

And

The Assistant General Manager , State Bank of India , Zonal Office , Region 11 , Sanjai Place , Agra.

AWARD

1. Central Government , MOL , New Delhi , vide its notification No. L- 12012/63 /2007-1R (B - 1 ) dated 11-09-07 , has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal-

2.Whether the action of the management of SB1 Agra in engaging Sri Trilok Singh workman for years together (more than Eleven years ) and not regularizing him in messengerial sub staff category is legal and justified ? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to ?

3. Brief facts are-

4. The applicant claimant Trilok Singh alleged that he was engaged as a Canteen Boy - Water Boy - cum- Peon against a regular, and permanent vacancy at SBI Industrial EstateBranchAligarh with effect from 23-06-95 , and he is working as such till date . He has also stated that a number of such employees who have put in 30 days service on either temporary basis or on daily basis have since been absorbed permanently, but he has been deprived of the opportunity. The bank management is exploiting the need of the employment of the workman in taking work since 1995 , on temporary basis and paying salary either by cheque 4233 G1/0921

6. The opposite party has filed written statement . Opposite party has also denied and contradicted the assertion made by the applicant . It is alleged by the opposite party that the applicant was employedby Local Implementation Committee (hereinafter referred to as LIC for the sake of brevity) as canteen boy in the canteen maintained by it at Delhi Gate Branch Aligarh by the management bank. LIC looks after all affairs of the, canteen , including appointment and removal of canteen boys and payment ofsalaries paid to them as they deemed fit and the SBI is not at all connected with the management of such a canteen . It is also stated that SBI is a Public Sector Institution and as such is having a well established recruitment system . No recruitment can be done by any officer other than the procedure lay down as per rules: It is stated that there was no relationship of master and servant between the bank and the claimant . It is stated that as he was working in LIC , at certain occasion his services might have been availed by the management like serving water purely in casual capacity for which payment has been made to him on daily wage basis for the work performed by him , it cannot be termed to be employment with the bank. It is stated that there was no unfair labour practice adopted by the bank. Therefore , the opposite party has prayed that the claim of the claimant be rejected .

7. Workman has not filed any documentary evidence in support of his case .

8. Opposite party has filed photocopies of documents vide list paper No. 10/1 which are paper No. 10/ 2-10/ 11 . Opposite party has also filed original documents vide list paper No.13 / 1 which are documents paper No.13 /2-13/20 .

9. 1 have heard the opposite party at length and perused the record and the evidence thoroughly . Despite giving several opportunities to the claimant , he has not adduced any documentary or oral evidence in support of his claim . The opposite party has contradicted the allegations of the workman and they have also produced oral as well as documentary evidence in support of the claim they have produced MW.1 Sri PK Gautam . When the applicantwas working in LIC at Delhi Gate Industrial Estate Branch , Aligarh ,as Canteen Boy, LIC used to make payments by cheque . The opposite party has filed the original copy of ledger paper No. 16/1 and the original cheque which are filed by list No. 13/1 . It is stated that the bank is a public institution and there is no control of the 7834

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

bank over the canteen run by the LIC . There is no relationship of Trilok Singh with the bank as servant and master . Branch manager does not have any power to appoint any person . He was not paid by the bank any salary or allowances . He does not have any relations with the Industrial State Branch of Aligarh . Claimant has not made any cross examination of MW.I Sri Gautam . Therefore , his statement is uncontroverted . There is no reason to disbelieve the oral as well documentary evidence adduced by the bank.

10. Therefore from the evidence adduced by the opposite party, it appears that the claimant was never employed by the bank as an employee . He was employed by LIC. Opposite party has produced a number of rulings .

11. I have gone through the same and respectfully agree with the law laid down by the Apex Court. He has produced ruling in the case reported in 1996 LAB IC 1048 , Employers in relation to the Management of Reserve ' Bank ofIndia versus Their Workmen . In this case workmen were employed in canteen being run in offices of RB- Held not employees of R.B.1 .

12. Another ruling 2000 LAB IC- 1482 SC , SBI and other versus SBI Canteen Employees concerning Bengal Cirele and others .

13.In this case also provisions of Sastri Award were discussed-It is held that Sastri award does not caste any obligation on SBI to provide canteen facilities by running a canteen It is also held that employees of canteen run by LIC cannot be claimed to be absorbed as employees of the bank - canteen run by LIC are non statutory canteen .

14. Therefore , in my view the applicant claimant has absolutely failed to prove his ease . He has not produced any iota ofevidence which can show relationship of servant and employerbetween him and the bank .

15. Therefore the award is decided in favour of the opposite party bank and against the claimant.

16. Award is answered accordingly. RAM PARKASH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 5 नवम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 3289,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 62/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, 'जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [ सं. एल-41012/254/95- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 5th November , 2009 S. O. 3289.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 62/97) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Central Railway and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 5-11-2009 .

[No. L-41012/254 /95 - IR (B - 1 ) ]

AJAY KUMAR , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR No. CGIT /LC/ R/62/ 97

Presiding Officer : Shri Mohd . Shakir Hasan TheVice President ,

All India Federation of Schedule Castes ,

Backwards and Minorities Welfare Association , 1/135 , S.P.M.Hoshangabad ( M.P ) , ...Workman/ Union

Versus

Divisional Railway Manager ( P), Central Railway, Bhopal

....Management

AWARD

Passed on this 23rd day of October , 2009 1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L -41012/254/95-1R ( B - 1 ) dated 4-3-97 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

"Whether the action of the management of DRM ( P ) , Central Railway, Bhopal in terminating the services of Shri Hussain Khan S/ o Shri Zabbar Khan w.c.f. 3-2-1986 is justified? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled for ? "

2. The case of the workman / Union in short is that the workman Shri Hussain Khan was a Gangman. He was served with a Charge- sheet dated 20-2-1984. It is alleged that on 9-2-1984 the workman misbehaved with Shri G : D. Misra, the then Pathway Inspector , H.B.D. and used filthy language against him. It is further alleged that the workman assaulted Shri S. N. Sachan , AEN ( S) Bhopal causing grievous hurt while he was on duty. He is said to have submitted his explanation but the same was not found satisfactory to the management and the departmental enquiry was ordered to be conducted against him . The workman is said to have not given reasonable opportunity and the Enquiry Officer was biased and was under the influence of the disciplinary authority . The principle of natural justice and fair play was violated. The charges were not discussed separately and no finding was given separately of cach charges . The enquiry report not show- any reason and discussion of evidence for coming to the finding that the charges were proved . After enquiry , a show- cause notice was also issued by the Divisional Engineer (South) Central Railway, Jhansi on 3-2-1986 and without assigning any reason passed the order of dismissal froin service w.e.f. 3-2-1986. The workman preferred an appeal against the order of dismissal . It is alleged that a criminal 7837

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर , 2009

dismissing Shri K.J. Jacob , Bankman from the Thumpolly branch of the bank vide order No. PIR/ MI / PF - 7380 /AW - 12/235/03 dated 27-01-2003 is proper and justified ? If not, to what reliefthe workman is entitled to ?"

का. आ. 3290.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार द फेडेरल बैंक लिमिटेड प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , एरनाकुलम के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 10/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल -12012/165/2006- आई आर. ( बी-1 ) ]

अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 5th November, 2009

S. O. 3290.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 10/2007 ) of Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court , Ernakulam as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of The Federal Bank Ltd. and their workmen , receivedby the Central Government on 5-11-2009 .

[No. L- 12012/165/2006 - IR ( B - I ) ] AJAY KUMAR , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM

2. The facts of the case in brief are as follows: Shri.K.J.Jacob was a Bankman of Federal Bank at Thumpolly branch of Aleppey district . The management alleged that heremained absent from 05-09-2003 to 09-12-2003 exceeding 30 days continuously without intimation and violated the leave rules . It is further alleged that again he remained absent from 07-02-2004 unauthorisedly and resumed duty only on 28-04-2004 . It is further alleged that he had issued six cheques without maintaining sufficient balance in his account and the cheques returned for want of sufficient fund. Another allegation is that the workman on 15.10.2004 entered the cabin of Assistant General Manager of the Regional Office, Alappuzha in a drunken state , threatened and abused AGM . On the same day evening he visited Mullackal branch of the bank under the influence of alcohol and attempted to shake hand with the Chief Manager of the branch and kiss him . Though he went out he returned soon and expressed sorry for his behaviour and saluted the Chief Manager . It is further alleged that the workman continued to remain absent without intimation for a period exceeding 30 days from 18-06-2004 to 25-10-2004 . On the basis of these allegations two charge sheets were issued to him and two enquiries were ordered . In the enquiries he was found guilty of all the charges and was dismissed from service without notice . Though he filed an appeal he did not succeed. Hence the reference .

Present : Shri P. L. Norbert , B.A. , L.L.B. , Presiding Officer

(Monday the 12th day of October , 2009 /20th Asvina , 1931)

I.D. NO . 10/2007

Union : The General Secretary, Federal Bank Employees Union , Central Office , Alwaye -683 101

3.Accordingto the Union there are no materials to find that the workman is guilty. The enquiry was conducted in violation ofthe principles ofnatural justice . The workman was not given sufficient opportunity to defend in the enquiry. The Enquiry Officer was biased . The punishment is too harsh and disproportionate to the charges . The workman has no employment. He is the sole bread winner ofthe family and prays for reinstatement .

By Adv. Shri C. Anil Kumar

Management : The Chairman , The Federal Bank Ltd. , Head Office , Alwaye- 683 101

By M/ s . B. S. Krishnan Associates .

This case coming up for hearing on 5-10-2009, this Tribunal- cum -Labour Court on 12-10-2009 passed the following:

AWARD

This is a reference made under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of Industrial Disputes Act. The refeence is :-

"Whether the action of the management of Federal Bank Ltd. with its Headquarters at Alwaye , Kerala in

4.According to the management the enquiries were conducted strictly in accordance with the provisions of Bipartite Settlement and following the principles of natural justice. In both enquiries the workman was defended by a defence representative . Sufficient opportunity was given to cross - examme all the management witnesscs and adduce defence evidence . It is on the basis of the evidence on record that the Enquiry Officer found the workman guilty ofall the charges . Copies of findings were furnished to the workman for his comments . The disciplinary authority , after considering the submissions of the workman , documents and other evidence in the enquiry , accepted the findings ofEnquiry Officer and imposed the punishment ofdismissal without notice . Though the defence was given sufficient opportunity to adduce defence evidence neither any 7838

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] witness was examined nor any document was produced.

There are no mitigating circumstances to take a lenient view in the matter of punishment . The workman is not entitled to be reinstated .

5. Inthe light of the above contentions the following points arise for consideration :

1. Are the findings sustainable ?

2. Is the punishment proper?

6. The evidence consists of Exts . M 1 and M2 Enquiry Filesalone .

is the Manager of Thumpolly branch . He has given evidence regarding the absence of the workman and the notice issued to him asking him to report for duty , his failure to resume duty and late submission of leave application and medical certificate . He also says that no intimation either written or oral was given by the workman regarding his absence until he resumed duty on 09-12-2003 . Thus he had remained absent continuously without intimation for a period exceeding 30 days from 12-09-2003 to 09-12-2003 . It is on the basis of this evidence that the enquiry officer found him guilty of gross misconduct of remaining absent in violation of the leave rules and Clause 19.5(p ) of6th Bipartite Settlement dated 14-02-1995 .

9. As per Ext . E -3 charge sheet the allegation is that the workman remained absent from 07-02-2004 to 27-04-2004. He produced a medical certificate and applied for leave only on resuming duty . The period of continuous absence was 80days . Exts.ME - 14a , b and e are the leave application , medical certificate and fitness certificate submitted on resuming duty after 80 days ' absence. But it is admitted by the management that a nil dated letter was received in the Branch on 25-02-2004 through a bearer informing that the workman and his children were sick and needed leave but without specifying the nature of siekness and the probable period of leave required . As per Ext.ME- 21 leave rules one has to apply for leave other than casual leave well in advance before the commencement of leave except in urgent cases or unforeseen circumstances like illness . But that does not mean that an employee can submit medical certificate as and when he likes . He has to do it without delay . Since he applied for leave with medical certificate only after resuming duty, the miscunduet is found to be a minor misconduct of remaining absent without leave by the Enquiry Officer and the finding calls for no modification.

7. Point No.1 :-Ext.M -2 Enquiry File relates to the first enquiry . Ext . E- 1 is the charge sheet dated 30-10-2003. The only charge as per Ext. E- 1 is that the workman remained absent without applying for leave from 05-9-2003 and produced medical certificates for the period from 09-09-2003 to 11-09-2003 . However he did not report for dutyon 12-09-2003 , but remained absent till date of Ext.E- 1 charge sheet dated 30-10-2003 and the absence exceeded 30 days . Again Ext.E - 2 charge sheet was issued on 26-11-2003 alleging that a cheque issued by the workman to Sri.D.V.Chandra Babu for Rs.20,000 returned for want of sufficient fund in the account of the workman . The payee lodged a complaint with the bank. Again a 3rd charge sheet wasissued ( Ext . E-3) on 14-05-2004 alleging that he remained absent unauthorisedly, without intimation from 07-02-2004 to 28-04-2004 .It is also alleged that he had issued five cheques without maintaining sufficient balance in his account . As a result all the 5 cheques returned without payment. Ext . E- 4 is the reply of the workman to the memoranda of charges . He contends in the reply that since he was siek he had availed leave and had applied for leave with medical certificates whenever he was absent . Regarding five cheques his contention is that he had given the cheques as security in connection with the purchase of articles . It is against the understanding between the parties that the cheques were presented . However thercafter those financial liabilities were settled . So also he contends that he had borrowed some money and issued a chcque to Sri.Saji in order to help his friend . However the liability was settled later .

10. As per Ext . E- 2 charge sheet the allegation is that the workman had issued a cheque for Rs . 20,000 in favour of Sri D. V. Chandra Babu . But the cheque when presented was not encashed for want of sufficient fund in the account ofthe workman . The payee lodged Ext . ME -2 complaint to the bank . It was forwarded to the head office by the Manager . Ext , ME1 is the report of Manager ( MW2 ) to the head office about the borrowal of money by the bank employee and dishonour of the cheque . Exts . ME3 , 4 and 5 are photocopy of cheque dishonour memo and letter of State Bank of India to Chandra Babu informing the return ofcheque . Ext . ME6 is the cheque return register showing thatthe cheque sent for collection returned . Ext . ME - 30 is the statement of joint account of workman and his wife , The balance in the account as on 01-08-2003 was Rs . 11 and paise 23 only . As per Ext.ME - 30 from the date of Chequetill 31-3-2004 at no point of time there was sufficient 8. As per Ext . El charge sheet the first allegation is that he remained absent from 05-09-2003 onwards till 09-12-2003 . Meanwhile he produced a medical eertificate requiring him to take 3 days ' rest for the period from 09-09-2003. to 11-09-2003 (Ext.ME.9 - c) . He should have joineddutyon 12-09-2003 . But he did not do so and resumed duty only on 09-12-2003 . Bank sent telegram on 06-10-2003 (Ext.ME.9 -a ) and letter dated 07-10-2003 (Ext.ME -9 - b ) asking the workman to report for duty immediately. However he did not do so until 09-12-2003 and then submitted leave application , medieal certificate and fitness certificate for leave from 05-09-2003 onwards ( Ext.ME- 10a, b and c) . MW2 7839 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14, 1931

(ofN.G. Sasidharan, Sr. Manager) , ME- 6 ( of T. Kalyana Subramanian , Sr. Manager) , ME- 7 (of Issac Abraham, Manager , Admn .) and ME- 8 ( of H.Narayanan , Clerk) . The aforementioned evidence prove that the incident is true .

balance to honour the cheque , As per Ext . ME- 8 instructions ofthe bank an employee has to maintain sufficient balance in his account before issuing cheques to anyone. The contention of the workman that the liability was settled withSri . D. V. Chandra Babu is no defence to the allegation of violation of instructions of the bank.

11. As per Ext . -3 charge sheet the allegation is that five cheques issuedto T. V. House , Bajaj Auto and an individual Saji M. B. returned for want of sufficient fund in theaccount ofthe workman . Ext. ME - 31 is the cheque return register. It shows that all the five cheques returned without encashing . As per Ext . ME - 8 Bulletin already referred the conduct of the workman is against the instructions of the bank. The Enquiry Officer on the basis of the records found the workman guilty of minor misconduct of breach of any rule of the business of the bank or instruction for running of any department . The finding is in order .

14. Another incident which took place on the same day was at Mullackal branch . Sri . Cherian M.Mattom was the ChiefManager of Mullackal branch on 15-10-2004 . He was examined as MW3 . He has given evidence that on 15-10-2004 around 7.15 p.m. workman had visited the branch and tried to shake hand with him which he refused . Then the workman tried to kiss him and the witness avoided. When the Chief Manager entered his cabin the workman followed him to the cabin , sat on a chair , spoke loudly, kept openthe door of the cabin , switched on the fan and asked him why A.G.M. and MW3 were not respecting the workman . He then went out of the cabin and returned soon and said that he was sorry and saluted the witness . There is no successful challenge in the cross examination of MW3 regardingthe incident . Ext.ME - 3 report was sent by MW3 about the incident to the head office . MW 1 , the Investigating Officer has also deposed in the enquiry that he came to understand during investigation that the workman had behaved in a disorderly manner under the influence of alcohol and misbehaved to the ChiefManager. Inthe light of this evidence the Enquiry Officer found that the 2nd ineident is also true and the finding requires no alteration.

12. As per Ext.ME - 1 Enquiry file there are two charges . Ext .E- l is the charge sheet dated 08-06-2005 . The first charge is that the workman had visited the Regional office ofthe bank at Alappuzha on 05-10-2004 around 4 p.m. , entered the cabin of Assistant General Manager in a drunken state requesting him to recommend to the Manager of Thumpolly branch to sanetion his loan , A.G.M. refused to do so on the ground that his leave was irregular . The workman then got wild and threatened and abused A.G.M. A clerk by name Narayanan was called to the cabin of A.G.M. and the workman was whisked away by him . On the same day around 7 p.m. the workman visited Mullackal branch in a drunken state and tried to shake hand and kiss the Chief Manager of the branch outside his cabin . Thereafter he entered the cabin of the Chief Manager and sat on a chair asking why the A.G.M. and Chief Manager were not respecting him . Then he went out of the cabin and came back and said to the Chief Manager that he was sorry for the incident and saluted him.

15. The 2nd charge as per Ext . El is that the workman had remained absent from 18-6-2004 to 10-09-2004 , on 8-10-2004 and from 14-10-2004 to 25-10-2004 continuously exceeding 30 days . He applied for leave with medical certificate only after resuming duty . On several occasions he had remained absent previously. The leave applications with medical certificates were submitted on 11-09-2004 , 09-10-2004 and 26-10-2004 for the above periods of absence . MW5 Sri.K.I. Soman was the then Principal officer of Thumpolly Branch and leave sanctioning authority of that branch where the worker was employed. Accordingto him no oral or written intimation was given to the branch either before or during the period of absence . Exts. ME- 25 to 29 are the attendance registers . As per the attendance registers the workman remained absent during aforementioned periods . His leave applications are Ext . ME- 15 , 19 and 23. They were submitted along with medical certificates , but after resuming duty. Ext.ME - ll is the leave rules which stipulates that one has to apply for leave other than casual leave well before the commencement of leave except in urgent cases or any unforeseen circumstances including illness . The hank had sent Ext.ME- 12 telegram and ME- 13 registered letter asking the workman to report for duty immediately. He neither reported for duty nor informed the bank about the reason for his absence . As 13. MWI is the Investigating Officer of Vigilance Department . He had investigated about the incident and submitted Ext . ME - I report to the head office , wherein he has narrated the incident that took place in the cabin of A.G.M. He also gave evidence in the enquiry . MW -4 is Sri N.G. Sasidharan , Sr. Manager of Regional office . He says that the had witnessed the incident . According to him A.G.M. had telephoned him for sending Clerk Narayanan to his cabin . After sometime MW- 4 heard a loud noise from outside the cabin of A.G.M. The workman was shouting at and threatening the A.G.M. MW-6 is the A.G.M. and he has narrated the incident . Ext. ME-2 is the report sent by A.G.M. to the head office . Ext . ME -4 is statement of MW6 given to the investigating officer , MW- 1 . Other witnesses who saw the incident gave statements to MWI and those statements are Exts . ME - 5 7840

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

In the result an award is passed finding that the action ofthe management in dismissing the workntan Sri . K.J. Jacob from service is legal and justified and he is not entitled for any relief.

The award will come into force one month after its publication in the official gazette.

Dictated to the Personal Assistant , transcribed and typed by her, corrected and passed by me on this the 12th day ofOctober , 2009 .

P. L. NORBERT , Presiding Officer per. Clause 19.5( p) of 6th Bipartite Settlement dated 14-02-1995 remaining absent without intimation continuously for a period exceeding 30 days is a gross misconduct . Since the workman was absent continuously without intimation exceeding 30 days he was found guilty of gross misconduct by the Enquiry Officer . The period from 18-06-2004 to 10-09-2004 comes to 85 days . In the light ofthe aforementioned evidence the workman is guilty of gross misconduct of remaining unauthorisedly and continuously absent without intimation for a period exceeding 30 days . The finding of the Enquiry Officer is in order.

Appendix

Witness for the Workman Nil .

Witness for the Management Nil .

Exhibit for the Workman Nil .

16. For the reasons stated above I hold that the charges levelled against the workman are found proved on the basis of the documentary and oral evidence adduced in the enquiry and the findings do not require any interference by this court.

Exhibit for the Management

Enquiry File .

M2 EnquiryFile. नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 3291.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार द फेडरल बैंक लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एरनाकुलम के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 15/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल-12012/4/2007- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 5th November , 2009

17. Point No. 2: A copy of the findings of the EnquiryOfficerwas given to the workman for his comments. He was also heard regarding the proposed punishment . It is thereafter that the punishment of dismissal was imposed by the disciplinary authority. He had filed an appeal and the submission made before the Appellate Authority is that he is innocent, that due to mental and physical illness and family problems he was not able to attend the office regularly , that he was under treatment in different hospitals due to an accident, that he has fully recovered from his illness and he is able to work regularly , that due to the illness there were financial liabilities and they are all now settled, that he has not misbehaved to A.G.M. purposely , that he has to look after his parents , wife and two school going children , that he is the sole bread winner of his family, that there is no alternate employment and that there will be no such lapses in future . However considering the seriousness of the misconduct the appellate authority was not inclined to reduce the punishment .

S. O. 3291. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Governrnent hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 15/2007 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Ernakulam as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of The Federal Bank Ltd. and their workrnan , received by the Central Government on 5-11-2009 .

[No. L- 12012/4/2007- IR ( B - I ) | AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT ERNAKULAM

Present : Shri P. L. Norbert , B.A. , L.L.B. , Presiding Officer (Wednesday the 30th day of September , 2009/ 8th Asvina , 1931 )

I.D. 15/2007

18. It is seen from the records that for unauthorised absence there was a previous disciplinary proceedings and he was punished with stoppage of increment for a period of one year with cumulative effect. That apart , he has committed a serious misconduct of disorderly and discourteous behavour to A.G.M. and Chief Manager under the influence of liquor . The workman was a bankman in service . He had shown the courage and audacity to threaten and abuse a high official ofthe bank and misbehave to another Sr. Manager of the bank in the presence of officials of the bank . Such indiscipline is intolerable especially from an employee of the lower strata. Unless punishment which is commensurate with the misconduct is imposed repetition of such misconduct cannot be deterred . In the above circumstances no interference in the quantum of punishment is called for .

[ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Union : The General Manager , Federal Bank Employees Union , Central Office , Aluva .

By Adv . Shri C. Anilkumar.

Management : The Chairman ,

The Federal Bank Ltd. , Head Office , Aluva .

By Adv . M /s . B.S. Krishnan Associates This case coming up for hearing on 24-09-2009 , this Tribunal - cum- Labour Court on 30-09-2009 passed the following.

AWARD

This is a reference made under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) of Industrial Disputes Act . The reference is :-

"Whether the action of the management of Federal Bank Ltd. , Aluva in imposing punishment of reduction of Basic Pay by two stages in the scale of pay on Sh . G. Idichandy, Clerk, P.F. No. 736 is just and reasonable ? If not , what relief the workman is entitled to ?"

2. The facts of the case in bricf are as follows : - Shri G.Idichandy was a Clerk of Oyoor branch in Kollam district. While so, on 29-4-2003 while tallying the cash an excess of Rs . 5,000 was found . The difference could not be located. It is alleged that subsequently the workman tried to misappropriate the money by creating records in collusion with customers . There was yet another allegation that he had discouraged customers from dealing with the management bank and acted against the interest of the bank . There was also allegation that two cheques issued in favour of HDFC bank were dishonoured due to insufficiency of funds . On the basis of these allegations a charge sheet was issued to him and an enquiry was conducted. He was found guilty of the charges Icvelled against him and the disciplinary authority imposed a punishment of reduction of basic pay by two stages . Aggrieved by the disciplinary action union raised a dispute which was referred to this court .

3. It is contended by the union that there is no evidence worth mentioning to prove the allegations against the workman . The charges are cooked up allegations . The enquiry was conducted in violation of the principles of natural justice. The documents of the management are fabricated rcecords . The documents were marked through incompetent witnesses . The punishment imposed is unsustainable . The past unblemished service of the workman was not considered by the disciplinary authority .

4233 G1/09-22

7841

भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

4. The management contends that the workman tried to embezzle Rs . 5,000 found as excess in collusion with certain customers of the bank . The workman had behaveof in a manner which is not condusive to the business of the bank. Two chequcs issued by him were dishonoured for want of sufficient funds . The vigilance investigation revealed that there was a prima - facie case against the workman. Hence he was placed under suspension and an enquiry was ordered . The workman was defended by a representative . The management witnesses were cross examined . The defence was given opportunity to adduce defence evidence . But no witnesses were examined . Two documents produced on the defence side were marked . The disciplinary authority had given a personal hearing regarding proposed punishment and after taking into consideration the submission of the workman the punishment was imposed . The appcal filed by him was rejected. The punishment is legal and proportionate to the gravity of the misconduct . There is no justification in interfering with the disciplinary action .

5. In the light of the above contentions the following points arise for consideration .

1. Are the findings sustainable ?

2. Is the punishment proportionate ?

The evidence consists of Ext. M - 1 enquiry file alone .

6. Point No. 1 : Shri G. Idichandy joined the service ofFederal Bank in 1972. He was working at Oyoor branch ofKollam district during 2003. On 29-4-2003 he was attending the main Cashier's section . On that day when cash was tallied an excess cash of Rs . 5,000 was found . The discrepancy could not be located. The explanation of the workman was not satisfactory to the management and hence he was placed under suspension as per order dated 21-7-2003 . Thereafter on 23-8-2003 a charge sheet was issued to him raising three charges . Ext. E- 1 is the charge shect . The charges are that on 29-4-2003 an excess amount ofRs . 5,000 was found in his counter and the difference in cash could not be located . Hence the arnount was credited to ' account payable account ' . However the workman in collusion with certain customers of the bank fabricated documents with a view to embezzle Rs . 5,000 . The 2pd charge is that the workman discouraged customers from dealing with Federai Bank , Oyoor branch on the ground that the interest rate was very law , the Branch Manager was not giving loans , deposits exceeding Rs . 50,000/- was subjected to income tax at the hands of the bank itself etc. The 3rd charge is that two cheques issued in favour of HDFC bank returned for want of sufficient funds in the account ofthe workinau . Ext . E- 3 is the explanation of the workman to the memo of charges . He has totally denied the charges except the dishonour of twe cheques which 7842

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] according to him happened because of suspension and non crediting of salary in his account . The management was not satisfied with the explanation . Hence an enquiry was ordered .

Santhosh submitted the claim through the workman . Ext . DE- 1 complaintwas submitted to the Chairman of the bank on 29-4-2003 . Ext . ME - 18 is a letter dtd . 1-7-2003 addressed tothe Manager ofthe Vigilance Department by Sri Santhosh complaining that on 29-4-2003 he had entrusted Rs . 5,000 to the workman who was in the cash section for crediting it inhis account . He had also given a'pay - in - slip. However the amount was not credited in his account . He came to know about it only on 8-5-2003 .

7. The Senior Manager of Vigilance Department (MW- 1 ) had conducted an investigation prior to the doinestic enquiry. In the investigation it was found that on 29-4-2003 in the counter of the workman there was an excess cash of Rs . 5,000 which was credited to' account payable account' . But the workman tried to misappropriate that money by submitting applications of eustomers to the Branch Manager claiming the amout. The conduct ofthe workman was against the interest of the bank . The reason for dishonour of two cheques issued by the workman was also investigated . The workman has admitted that there was an excess cash of Rs . 5,000 on 29-4-2003 in his counter which was credited to ' account payable account ' According to the management an application in the handwriting of the workman purported to be prepared by Smt. Susamma Mathew , W/ o Koshy Mathew an NRE Account holder and neighbour of the workman , was submitted to the Branch Manager claiming that out of the cheque amount of Rs . 25,000 the payee , Sri Sudheer had received only Rs . 20,000 and the balance amount of Rs. 5,000 was to be given to Smt . Susamma Mathew which she did not receive . This is denied by the workman in his reply Ext. E- 3 . However the bank had written Ext. ME - 25 letter to NRE Account holder Sri Koshy Mathew enquiring about the cheque transaction for Rs . 25,000 and whether the full amout was received by the payee or not? Ext . ME -26 is the reply of Shri Koshy Mathew . The customer was irritated by frequent enquiries by the bank in his house about the transaction and so he replied that in future no clarifications shall be sought from him or from his family. But he clarified that the cheque amount of Rs . 25,000 was intended to be paid only to Sri Sudheer and the amount in full was received by Sri Sudheer . Meanwhile Sr. Manager informed the workman that application of Smt . Susamma Mathew cannot be entertained because she was neither the account holder nor the payee of the cheque . On 7-5- 2003 the application was returned to the workman . The workman does not admit the return of the application . But the Manager (Admn .) , MW - 2 has given evidence that the application of Smt . Susamma Mathew was prepared in the handwriting ofthe workman . On 8-5-2003 another customer by name Santhosh of M/ s . S. R. Super Market , Oyoor made a claim for Rs . 5,000 said to have been remitted by him but not credited in his account . Ext. ME - 15A is his complaint dated 8-5-2003 submitted to the Manager of Oyoor Branch . Ext . ME - 16 is copy of counter foil of remittance slip for Rs . 5,000 dated 29-4-2003 . According to the management Sri

8. It is to be noted that Sri Santhosh has different versions about the manner in which Rs.5,000 was entrusted to the workman for remittance in his account . As per Ext. DE- 1 he says that he himself had remitted Rs . 5,000 on 29-4-2003 . But Ext . ME- 18 letter to the Manager ofVigilance Department he says that he had entrusted the money to the workman and thereafter took a pay - in- slip from the counter and returned to his office for fixing the seal of the shop in the pay in slip. Then the pay - in - slip was handed over to his employee Sri Saju for giving it to the Cashier of the bank . But the amount was not credited in his account . Ext. ME - 19 is a statement of Smt . Seema Kareem, a Clerk of Oyoor branch , givento the Sr. Manager of Vigilance Department on 1-7-2003 . She says that on 7-5-2003 the workman had approached her around 3.30 p.m. and asked for the cash received seal . He took the seal and after sometime it was returned . Subsequently when Smt. Seema Kareem affixed seal on a pay - in - slip of a customer she noticed that the date and month on the seal were incorrect . Ext. ME- 14A is counter foil of pay- in - slip for Rs . 50 dated 7-5-2003 for crediting in the S. B. Account of one R.Chandrika . However the cash received seal contained date of ' 38 ' . According to the management while the seal was returned to Seema Kareem the date and month of seal was 38th April . The original of counter foil of pay in slip for Rs . 5,000 ( Ext . ME - 16 ) was corrected with ink as 29-4-2003 . When Seema Kareem affixed the seal in Ext. ME - 14A counter foil , the date of seal was 38 April . This happened due to the reason that the workman had triedto change the date to 29-4-2003 . But actually Ext . ME - 16 counter foil was prepared on 7-5-2003 and the cash received seal was taken from Smt. Scema Kareem on 7-5-2003 . Ext . ME-23 is the statement of MW3 , Sri K.J. Chacko , Sr. Manager given to MW1 . The statement shows that besides the application of Smt . Susamma Mathew, Sri Santhosh had also given a claim application on 7-5-2003 . Butthey were fake claims based on fabricated documents . MW3 has deposed that Smt. Susamma Mathew had claimed Rs . 5,000 through the workman and the application was in the handwriting of the workman. On 7-5-2003 it was taken backby the workman . On 8-5-2003 the workman submitted another application of Sri Santhosh to MW2 which was forwarded to MW3 . But Santhosh had different versions about the mode of remittance of Rs . 5,000 . The workman

11911 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

had put his signature instead of initial which is the normal practice , in Ext . ME- 16 counter foil . The date of cash received seal was seen corrected by ink as 29-4-2003 . Hence the matter was reported to the superior Officer .

9. Thus it is seen from the documents and oral evidence ofMW 1 to 3 that an application of Smt. Susamma Mathew prepared in the handwriting of the workman was submitted to the Manager of Oyoor branch elaiming Rs . 5,000 . But the husband of Smt . Susamma Mathew who had drawn the cheque for Rs . 25,000 in favour of one Sudheer admitted that the payee had received the full amount and nothing was outstanding to be paid . Then the 2nd claim was made by Sri Santhosh . But the versions of Santhosh regarding the mode of remittance give room for doubt. accordidng to Sri Santhosh an amount of 35. 5,000 was entrusted to the workman who was in the cash counter on 29-4-2003 for remittance into his account. But the date of cash received seal was corrected . The seal that was in the counter of Smt . Seema Kareem was taken by the workman for affixing the seal on Ext . ME - 16 pay - in-slip. Butthe date of seal in Ext . MW- 16 was corrected with ink. When Smt . Seema Kareem affixed the seal on Ext.ME - 14A counter foil ofpay- in - slip of another customer she noticed some change in the date of the seal . These strong circumstances point the finger at the workman for staking a fake claim.

10. The 2nd charge is that the workman used to discourage and dissuade the customers from having business with Federal Bank on the ground that the rate of interest was very low , the Branch Manager was not sanctioning loans , deposits exceeding Rs . 50,000 were subjected to income tax etc. MW1 has given evidence in support of the allegaitions against the workman (page 13 of the proceedings in Ext . MI ) . Accordingto MW2 the workınan was instrumental in creating publicity that bank was adopting a negative approach in business development . Accordingto MW3 the workman had persuaded customers to close their accounts in Federal Bank ( page 32 ) . Ext . ME- 27 is the report of MW3 to the Vigilance Department about the general behaviour of workman which was against the interest of the bank. Ext. ME - 20 is a statement of Smt . Susanna C. George , Clerk of Oyoor branch given to the Vigilance Department on 2-7-2003 . According to her she has heard the workman persuading customers to close their accounts in Oyoor branch and go elsewhere since the Manager was not sanctioning loans , the interest rate was very low and it was better to approach Muthoot Bank . He had also instigated coustomers not to remit more than Rs . 50,000 lest they be subjected to income tax . It is further stated that the workman used to abuse the sub - staff of the bank . The testimony of MWs . I to 3 regarding the behaviour of the workman is not

7843

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14, 1931

successfully challenged by the defence . There is no contra evidence . The charge stands proved.

11. The 3rd charge is that the workman had issued two cheques in favour of HDFC Bank . But when they were presented for encashment they were dishonoured for want of sufficient funds in the account of the workman . In Ext . E3 reply to the memo of charges the workman has admitted that he had issued two cheques and they were dishonoured for lack of funds in the account . But according to him it happened due to the fact that he was under suspension since 23-8-2003 and no salary was credited to his account thereafter . The workman cannot take shelter under the disciplinary proceedings or suspension order . Ext . ME - 30 is the Federal Bank Bulletin which says that employees of the bank have to maintain sufficient balance in their accounts in order to honour cheques as and when they are presented for payment . It was the duty of the workman to seethat sufficient balance is maintained in order to honour the cheques issued by him. Since he has failed to do so it is against the instructions of the bank in the Bulletin . The 3rd charge also stands proved . The Enquiry Officer has recorded the findings based on evidence and circumstances and call for no interference .

12. Point No. 2 : The punishment imposed is reduction of basic pay by two stages in the scale of pay . Since the findings are confirmed and since the punishment neither falls under Section 11 - A of 1.D. Act nor violates any provision of Bipartite Settlements or provisions of law , this court has no power to alter the punishment . Besides the punishment is definitely in proportion to the gravity of the misconduct . Ilence I refrain from interfering with the order of punishment as well.

In the resulf an award is pased finding that the action ofthe management in imposing the punishment of reduction of basic pay by two stages in the scale of pay on the workman , Sri . G. Idichandy is legal and justified and he is not entitled for any relief.

The award will come into force one month after its publication in the Official Gazette .

Dictated to the Personal Assistant , transcribed and typed by her , corrected and passed by me on this the 30 day of September, 2009 .

P. L. NORBERT, Presiding Officer

APPENDIX

Witness for the Workman Nil

Witness for the Management Nil

Exhibit for the Workman Nil

Exhibit for the Management Nil 7844

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5,2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) | नई दिल्ली , 5 नवम्बर , 2009

District as full time messenger in 1982. While so on the allegation of embezzlement of money of customers he has placed under suspension on 2-3-2005 , a charge sheet was issued on 29-4-2005 and an enquiry was conducted . Five charges were levelled against him . He was found guilty of all except 3rd charge and was dismissed from service . Though he filed an appeal he did not succeed.

का.आ. 3292.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार साऊथ मलाबार ग्रामीण बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एरनाकुलम के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 11/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/177/2006- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 5th November , 2009

3.Accordingto the workman the enquiry was conducted in flagrant violation of principles of natural justice . The workman was not provided with opportunity to defend. Material witnesses were not examined and sufficient opportunity was not given to examine defence witnesses . There is no legal and acceptable evidence to prove the charges . The findings are perverse . The punishment imposed is disproportionate to the charges . The workman has an unblemished past service record for a period of23 years . He is the only earning member of a poor family consisting of wife and Two children . His wife is unemployed . The workman has crossed the age of 43 years . There is no possibility for getting an alternate employment . He is entitled to be reinstated .

S.O. 3202 -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 11 / 2007) Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- labour Court , Ernakulam as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of South Malabar Gramin Bank and their workmen , receivedby the Central Government on 5-11-2009 .

[No.1-12012/ 177 /2006 - IR ( B - 1 ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE INTERNTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TREE CUNT- LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM PRESENT

Shri Norbert , B.A , LL.B.. Presiding Officer (Thursday da , Biday of October , 2009 / 16th Asvina , 1931 )

1.D. 11/2007

Workmar M.P. Ravindran , Mandapalliyal House , Elamkulam Kunnakkavu P.O. Malapuram - 679340 . By Adv . Shri C. Anil kumar.

Management : The Chairman ,

4.According to the management the workman had participated in the enquiry throughout . He was defended bya defence representative . All the management witnesses were cross - examined . There defence witnesses were examined . A copy of the report was furnished to the workman calling for his representation . The disciplinary authority after considering the representation of the workman accepted the findings of Enquiry Officer . Anatice ofproposed punishment was given to the workman calling for his representation . He was also heard personally. Considering the gravity of the misconduct the penalty of dismissal was imposed . The appeal filed by him was rejeted . The is no infringement of any legal rights or violation of the principles of natural justice in the enquiry . The disciplinary authority had considered all the mitigating circumstances while determining the quantum of punshment . There is no reason to reduce the punishment .

5. In the light ofthe above contentions the following points arise for consideration:

South Malabar Gramin Bank, Head Office , Malappuram. By Adv. M.S. Unnikrishnan .

1. Are the findings sustainable ?.

2. Is the punishment proper ?

This case coming up for hearing on 1-10-2009 , this Tribunal-cum- Labour Court on 8-10-2009 passed the following.

AWARD

6. The evidence consists of oral testimony of MWI and documentary evidence of Ext.M 1 Enquiry File on the side of the management and no evidence on the side of workman.

This is reference made under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of Industrial Disputes Act . The reference is :

"Whether the action of the management of South Maiabar Gramin Bank in dismissing Shri M.P. Ravindran , a former messenger of the Bank on the alleged misconduct of the embezzlement of depositors customers fund as fair and justifiahle ? If not, what relief Shri Ravindran is entitled to ? "

7. Point No. 1 : Ext . P- 51 of Ext . MI enquiry file is the charge sheet . Five charges are levelled against the workman . The first and second charges are co - related and they are that on 14-9-2004 the workman had otbained a loan of Rs . 60,000 from customer Shri M.P. Kunju Beeran promising to repay in a week . Out of this amount Rs . 10,000 was taken by the workman personally and Rs . 50,000 was credited to one Ali's Account . On 28-10-2004 he informed Kunju Beeran that he had remitted Rs . 60,000 in Beeran's 2. The facts of the case in brief are as follows : --- Shri M.P. Ravindran joined the service of South Malabar Gramin Bank, Elamkulam Branch of Malappuram 7845 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

account . However, he had remitted only Rs . 36,000 . Believing the words of the workman , Beeran issued a cheque for Rs . 75,000 to one Hidayath . He also entrusted Rs . 15,000 to Hidayath requesting him to remit it in his account before presenting the cheque so that there will be sufficient amount in his account. Hidayath then gave the cheque to the workman and asked him to credit Rs . 75,000 in his father's account (Muhammed Haji) . The workman without crediting the amount, made a false entry in the pass book ofMohammed Haji for Rs . 75,000 and returned the pass book to him . Later when Beeran remitted Rs . 1,20,000 in his account the workman presented the cheque of Hidayath for Rs . 75,000 got the money by debiting the account of Kunju Beeran and embezzled that amount . On the basis of a complaint of Kunju Beeran the bank initiated disciplinary proceedings .

8. According to the workman Ext . P- 15 cheque for Rs . 60,000 is a self cheque of Kunju Beeran and the cheque amount was received by Kunju Beeran himself. No money was borrowedby worker from Kunju Beeran . In connection with the purchase of building materials the workman owed Rs . 60,000 to Kunju Beeran . That account was settled later and Kunju Beeran has admitted that fact and he has no complaint against the workman . Ext . P - 11 is a letter given to the bank by Kunju Beeran on 21-2-2005 withdrawing his complaint against the workman on the ground that the financial dealings between him and the workmah were settled and he has received amounts due to him with interest . However, evidence to be discussed will go to show that this was not the real state of affairs . The workman had promised to remit Rs . 60,000 in the account of Kunju Beeran within a week from the date of Ext. P - 15 ( 14-9-2004) . The subsequentevents and issuance of cheque by Kunju Beeran to Hidayath and Hidayath transferring the cheque amount to the account of his father are linked to the assurance of worker to remit Rs . 60,000 in the account of Kunju Beeran . Ext . P- 10 complaint ofKunju Beeran supports the case of the management regarding the dishonest and fraudulent conduct of the workman .

9. Ext . P - 15 (page 84 of Ext . M1 ) is the cheque for Rs . 60,000 issued by Kunju Beeran . Ext . P- 14 ( page 83 ) is a statement of a Clerk of the bank , Sivadas given to the Manager of the bank stating that out of Ex.P - 15 cheque amount Rs . 50,000 was credited to the account of one Ali and Rs . 10,000 was paid to the workman . Ext.P - 16 ( page 85) is the pay- in- slip for Rs . 50,000 remitting it in the account ofAli . Though the worker had informed Kunju Beeran that he had remitted Rs . 60,000 in the account of Kunju Beeran on 28-10-2004, in fact he had remitted only Rs . 36,000 . Ext.P7 ( page 76 ) in the pay is slip for Rs . 36,000 remitting the amount in the account of Kunju Beeran on 28-10-2004. Thepay- in- slip is initialled by the workman . The workman admitted this when he was examined ( page 47) . Believing that there is a remittance of Rs . 60,000 in the account , Sri Kunju Beeran issued Ext . P5 ( page 74) cheque for Rs . 75,000 to Shri Hidayath . Sri Hidayath entrusted itto the workman asking him to credit the amount in the account of his father ,

Muhammed Haji . Ext. P4 is the pass hook of Muhammed Haji ( page 73 ) . The last entry on 29-10-2004 relates to deposit of Rs . 75,000 and the entry was made by the workman . He has admitted it ( page 46 ). Ext.P3 ( page 70 ) is the ledger folio of the account of Muhammed Haji . There is no corresponding deposit on 29-10-2004 or on any other date. The last two deposits as per Ext . P3 were on 5-8-2004 and 10-2-2005 . The amounts are Rs . 43 and 44 respectively. Thus the workman had recorded deposit of Rs . 75,000 in Ext . P4 pass book on 29-10-2004 fraudulently . Ext . P8 ( page 77) is the pay - in- slip by which Kunju Beeran remitted Rs. 1,20,000 in his account on 12-11-2004. On the next day the workman presented the cheque for Rs . 75,000 issued byBeeran and obtained the amount. Ext . P59 ( page 153 ) is theledger folio of the account of Kunju Beeran . It shows that on 12-11-2004 he had deposited Rs . 1,20,000 . On 13-11-2004 cheque of Beeran bearing cheque No.764294 for Rs . 75,000 ( Ext.P5 ) was presented and amount withdrawn . Therefore , the contention of the defence that the father of Ilidayath had received the amount on presenting the cheque a second time, is not convincing because from the date of the cheque on 15-10-2004 till 12-11-2004 there was no sufficient balance in the account of Kunju Beeran to honour the cheque. Having made an entry regarding deposit of Rs . 75,000 in Ext.P4 , pass book ofMuhamined Haji on 29-10-2004 it was not proper for the workman to return the pass hook to Muhammed Haji or Hidayath without cancelling the entry . Having found that there is no sufficient balance in the account of Kunju Beeran it was necessaryto return the cheque ( Ext.P5 ) with a dishonour memo showing the reason for dishonour . That was also not done . These circumstances go to show that the workman had not remitted the amount as promised by him in the account of Kunju Beeran , but made false entries and misappropriated the moncy. Sri . Kunju Beeran gave Ext.P - 10 complaint to the bank about the irregularities committed by the workman . Later he withdrew the complaint by Ext. P - 11 letter . Ext . Di is a statement given by Hidayath to the Investigating Officer of the bank . It is stated by Hidayath that he had approached the bank on 29-10-2004 with a cheque for Rs . 75,000 issued by Kunju Beeran and had requested the workman to credit that amount in the account of his father Muhammed Haji . But the cheque was returned in the evening stating that there isno sufficient balance in the account of Kunju Beeran . On 15-2-2005 again the cheque was presented . But he was tald that there was no sufficient balance in the account of Kunju Beeran. It fortifies the case of the management that the workman had committed the irregularities and embezzled the money of customers . However , the learned counsel for the worker submits that as per Ext . D2 statement given ta the Investigating Officer by Kunju Beeran on 3-8-2005 he had stated that an amount of Rs . 60,000 encashed on 14-9-2004 as per Ext . P - 15 cheque was for his own need . But in the light of Ext. P - 10 complaint to the bank on 21-2-2005, Εxt . D2 can be considered only as an after- thought. In Ext . P- 10 Kunju Beeran did allege that the workmanhad requested for a loan of Rs . 60,000 and he had issued a cheque to the workman and the latter had promised 7846

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009 / AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

PART II SEC. 3 (ii) | to return the money within a week. Since the amount due to Kunju Beeran was received by him later, he did not want to pursue his complaint . But that will not alter the position prior to Ext . D2 . In the light of the evidence discussed above, there can be no doubt that charges i and 2 stand proved.

10. Charge No. 3 is found not proved by the Enquuiry Officer.

22-2-2005 by which Rs . 5000 was remitted to the account of Aysha. The workman has admitted that Ext. P-35was prepared by him in his handwriting and the amount was remitted by him ( page 48) . It is relevant to note that in Ext.P-38 ledger folio there is a deposit of Rs . 9 on 10-2-2005 towards interest . It is thereafter that Rs.5000 was deposited on 23-2-2005. But in Ext.P - 39 pass book interest of Rs . 9 is not seen credited . The next entry of deposit of Rs.5,000 /- alone is shown . Thus the worker had misappropriated the money of Rs . 5,000 entrusted by Aysha and later remitted it into her account . But according to the workman Smt . Aysha had approached him on 22-2-2005 for remitting Rs.5000 in her account . But she reached the bank after the business hours . Hence the amoun could not be credited on that day, but was credited on the next day . But Ext.P - 7 complaint of Aysha shows that she had been to bank on 7-1-2005 and entrusted money and passbook to the workman for remittance into her account . After a few days she had visited the bank again and came to know that the amount she had entrusted to the workman was remitted in her account only after 1½ inonths . Besides the discrepancy in the pass book also supports the charge .

In the light of the evidence discussed above I find no ground to interfere with the findings of Enquiry Officer .

11. The 4th Charge is that one Sri . C. Sankaran Nair an Ex - NRI account holder had availed a VSL loan for Rs . 2,00,000 . He was familiar with the workman . Using the position as a bank employee the workman diverted this amount of Rs.2,00,000 for closing the gold loan of his cousin Sri .M. P. Suresh kumar . Ext. P- 26 ( page -96) is the debit slip for Rs . 2,00,000 . Later the workman remitted Rs . 1,47,612 in the account of Sankaran Nair by Ext . P -24 pay - in - slip ( page- 94). It is prepared and signed by the workman . The workman has admitted this (page 47) . By Ext . P -22 challan ( page 92) the workman again remitted Rs . 50,000 in the account of Sankaran Nair on 8-6-2004. Ext. P -22 is signed by the workman . It is to be noted that on 8-6-2004 the wife of Sankaran Nair Smt . Chandrika had been to bank to wirhdraw an amount of Rs . 50,000 from her account. Yet Ext . P - 22 remittance was made by the workman in the account of Sankaran Nair and not by Smt . Chandrika . Ext . P - 18 is the withdrawal slip signed by Smt . Chandrika for withdrawing Rs . 50,000 on 8-6-2004 . The workman had thus made two remittances to the account of Sankaran Nair . No doubt DW1 Sri . M. P. Sureshkumar has given evidence that gold loans were availed by him for his personal needs and loan amounts were remitted by him and accounts were closed by him. But DWI being the cousin of the workman he is an interested witness . The evidence and the circumstances go to show that the workman had utilised the VSL loan amount for his personal purposes and later remitted the amount and closed the account. It is true that Sankaran Nair has not made any complaint against the workman. But workman and Sankaran Nair are friendly and the VSL loan transaction has not caused any loss to Sankaran Nair . However , the records reveal the workman has fraudulently raised a loan in the name of Sankaran Nair for meeting needs of the workman .

14. Point No. 2 : The punishment imposed is dismissal from service . According to the workman the punishment is disproportionate to the charges . He claims that he has an unblemished past service of 23 years . Ile belongs to a poor family and he is the sole carning member ofthe family. His wife is unemployed. I le has two children. There is no alternate employment . He is aged 43 and cannoi get another employment . These aspects were duly considered by the disciplinary authority as well as the appellate authority. But the misconduct committed by the workman is serious in nature . The bank lost faith in the employee. In such a situation he cannot be entrusted with any work in a banking institution which deals with public money . The trust and faith of the customers is of paramount importance to a bank. If that is undermined by the conduct ofa bank employee the business of the bank will be affected . Condidering the gravity of the charges I don't think that themitigating circumstances mentioned by the workman is a reason to reduce the punishment.

15. In the result an award is passed finding that the action of the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal of Sri . M. P. Ravindran from service of the bank is legal and justified and he is not entitled for any relief.

12. Charge No. 5 is that Smt . Aysha an account holder had entrusted Rs . 5,000 to the workman on 7-1-2005 for depositing it in her accont . The pass book was also entrusted to the workman. After a few days when she got the pass book from the workman she found that the remittance she had made on 7-1-2005 was credited only on 23-2-2005.

The award will come into force one month after its publication in the Official Gazette .

Dictated to the Personal Assistant , transcribed and typed by her , corrected and passed by me on this the 8thday of October , 2009 .

P.L. NORBERT , Presiding Officer

Appendix

Nil

Witness for the Workman

13. Ext . P- 37 is the complaint of Smt . Aysha dated 25-2-2005 ( page 108) . Ext . P -38 is the ledger folio of the account of Aysha . The last entry is of 23-2-2005 for Rs. 5000 /- Ext. P - 39 is the pass book . The last entry in the pass book is deposit of Rs.5000 . But the date of remittance is not discernable . However , the workman has admitted that the entry was recorded by him in the pass book (page 48) .Ext . P-35 (page 105) is the pay- in- slip for Rs. 5000 dated 7847 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

Witness for the Management

reference will take place on 25-11-2009.

MWI- P. M. Damodaran

18-11-2008

No order as to costs.

Exhibits for the Workman

K. K. PANDYA , Presiding Officer Exhibits for the Management

नई दिल्ली, 9 नवम्बर , 2009

EnquiryFile. MI

नई दिल्ली, 6 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3294 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं डब्ल्यू.सी . एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 46/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था । का. आ. 3293,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ बडौदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 666/2008 दिनांक 18-8-2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28-10-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -12011/66/2003- आई आर ( बी- II ) ]

[सं. एल-22012/153/2000- आई आर ( सी -11) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 9th November , 2009 उदय शंकर पाण्डेय, अनुभाग अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 6th November , 2009

S.O. 3294.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 46/ 2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Nagpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of WCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Govemment on 9-11-2009 .

S.O. 3293. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 666/ 2008 dt . 18-8-2003 ) of the Industrial Tribunal Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Bank of Baroda and their workman , which was received bythe Central Government on 28-10-2009 .

[ No. L -22012/153 /2000 - IR ( C - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

[No. L- 12011 /66/2003 - IR (B - II ) ] U. S. PANDEY, Section Officer

BEFORE SHRI A. N. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT- CUM - LABOIUR COURT, NAGPUR Case No. CGIT/ NGP/ 46/ 2001 ANNEXURE BEFORE THE HON'BLE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD

Date :30-10-2009

Ref. (ITC) No. 666/2008

Bank ofBaroda

....... First Party

Petitioner/ PartyNo. 1

V/s .

Second Party

Workmen Employed under it

The President, R.K.K.M.S. ( INTUC) P.O. Chandematta , Dist. Chhindwara Verses

Respondent/ Party No. 2

The Chief General Manager , Western Coalfields Ltd. , Kanhan Area Post . Dungaria , Dist . Chhindwara This reference had been referred by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi vide its Order No. L- 12011 / 66/2003 - IR(B - II) dated 18th August, 2008 to the Presiding Officer , Industrial Tribunal , Vadodara . Thenafter , itwas transferred to Central Government Industrial - cum- Labour Court , Baroda and subsequently it was transferred to this Tribunal by appropriate order .

AWARD (Dated 30th October , 2009 )

2.Before proceedings ofthis reference takes place , the parties have submitted application for taking this matter on Board on 11-9-2009 vide Exh- 9 . This is a reference of three workmen. Out of them , Shri Pareshkumar Gopalbhai Patel , submitted withdrawal pursis on 11-9-2009 vide Exh-10.

In view of the said pursis , 1 pass the following Part- I Award as under :

PART- I AWARD

1. Central Government after satisfying the existence ofdispute between the President , R.K.K.M.S. ( INTUC ) P.O. Chandematta, Dist . Chhindwara ( Party No. 1) and the Chief General Manager, Western Coalfields Ltd. , Kanhan Area Post. Dungaria, Dist. Chhindwara (Party No. 2 ) referred the same for adjudication to this Tribunal vide its letter No. 1.- 22012/ 153/2000-1R ( C- II ) dated 25-1-2001 under clause (d) of sub Section ( 1 ) and sub Section ( 2A ) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) with the following schedule :

Workman Shri Pareshkumar Gopalbhai Patel is permitted to withdraw this reference and for remaining two workmen viz . Shri Nareshkumar Bhagubhai Patel and Shri Nareshkumar Ramubhai Ahir, the proceedings ofthis 7848

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

raised this dispute with the request to hold that action of the management in not correcting his date of birth is illegal , notjustificd and direct the management to correct his date of birth on the basis of middle passed ccrtificate as per provision ofNational Coal Wages Agreement- III.

2. "Whether the action of the management of Nandan CoalWashery of WCL , Kanhan Area , in not correcting the date of birth of Sh . Parasram S /o Sh . Faddoo, Sub-Station Attendant of Nandan Coal Washery of WCL, Kanhan Area as 12-10-1953 instead of 1-10-1950 isjustified ? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled ? "

4. The management by filing its Written Statement resisted the claim of Petitioner . According to it, the Petitioner was appointed at Damua Colliery for the first time on 25-8-73 . As per statutory requirement he was asked to fill up the Form- B as per mine rules . The Petitioner recorded the particulars in Form- B at Sl.No.436 and he has clearly mentioned his age as 26 years as on 1976 and accordingly his date of birth was recorded as 1-1-1950 .As per rules spelled out in 1-1-76 of NCWA - III, since it was singed by him in token of acceptance who was claiming as literate person, he is not entitled to challenge the same after a long period of 26 years . He has repeated the same date of birth in the year 1984 while joining at Nandan Washery Colliery which is another sister unit of Western Coalfields Ltd. His age was recorded as 34 years as on 1-1-84 which support that his date of birth was 1-1-50. It is also signed by the Petitioner and accepted it . The Form-B is also showing the same date of birth and applicant has not disputed it on two occasions and therefore there is no controversy in the date of birth . Special procedure is framed for changing the date of birth called as implementation as instruction No.76 . According to the management the service excerpt Form- B and the other record is duly signed and accepted by the Petitioner and as there is no variation in the record the provision of 1-1-76 of NCWA - III is not applicable to it and it cannot he reopened . Finally it has prayed to reject the claim of Petitioner by passing negative Award .

5. Heard the counsels for he parties , perused the documents it seems that the petitioner was appointed on 25-8-1973 as Loader his name was sponsored by the employment exchange after interview . Undisputedly he had passed 10th standard and he was appointed . At time ofappointment he has signed the form " B" wherein his date of birth was written as 1-10-1950 . and again at the time ofhis appointment as Electric operator- Cum-Fitter on 27-03-1984 he was required to sign the Form " B " and at that time also his date of birth is mentioned as 1-10-50 Pointing these documents the counsel for management submitted that he signed it in token of the acceptance of the correetness and his eertificates filed before the Court are bogus . However the petitioner was , no doubt literate , butthe explanation given by him that only his signaturcs were obtained on blank forms on the both occasions . Generally at the time of new appointment any person signs it hurriedly under the impression that what is mentioned by the experienced Clerk is correct . I do not think that there are any reasons to doubt creditability of the petitioner's evidence .

6.It is submitted on behalf of the managements that the Petitioner kept silence till he received the notice of 3. The Petitioner , the President, R.K.K.M.S. ( INTUC) P.O. Chandematta , Dist . Chhindwara approached to this Tribunal with the issue of correcting date of birth of its member namely Shri Parashram Bhaddoo . However , the Union is not appearing before the court and is not prosecuting the reference . Before this Court the Petitioner is prosecuting it though his counsel independently and not through the Union . According to the Petitioner Shri Parashram Bhaddoo , the management has wrongly entered his date of birth as 1-10-1950 and issued a notice of retirement from the service by the end of the month i.e. on 31-12-2009. The management has wrongly mentioned the above date though he had stated his date of birth as 12-10-1953. On receipt of the copy of service excerpt he made a representation to the management but the issue of correction of his date of birth was not considered as yet and the issue was raised by the Union , R.K.K.M.S. ( INTUC) Chandarnetta long back by its letterdt.25-3-99 . However, the management being rigid did not even attend the conciliation proceeding before ALC and did not correct his date of birth . According to him , the management has wrongly mentioned his date of birth as 1-10-1950 in Form- B aswell as in Service Excerpt . He had produced primary school certificate dt.1-5-67 showing his date ofbirth as 12- 10-53 then middle passed certificate of Hausangabad division in the month of May ] 971. A certificate of Principal of Higher Secondary School , Damua and the transfer certificate issued by the Principal . All these certificates are showing his date of birth as 12-10-53 . He was appointed on 25-8-73 on which in Form- B Register his date ofbirth is wrongly recorded as 1-10-50 . The applicant immediately objected recording of his date of birth and therefore his case was referred to headquarter of Western Coalfields Ltd. The management despite referring it to the head office and putting a note about correcting the date did not proceed further . It. had admitted that the workman has objected recording of date of birth on the basis of the middle class certificate and informed to the Petitioner that the matter has been referred to the headquarter for the approval for correcting his date of birth . According to him, it was necessary under the provision of 1.1 No.76 of NCWA - III to correct his date ofbirth . The management is under obligation to admit the cards issued by the University, Board, Middle passed certificate of the Board of Education or the department of public institution and that such certificate should be treated as correct in respect ofdate of birth , ifthey are issued by the above institution prior to the date of entry in the service . According to him, he was employed on 25-8-1973 and he had submitted the dateof birth certificate i.e. middle passed certificate and primary school certificatedt . May, 1971 and 1-5-1967 respectively. As date of birth is not till corrected , he has [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

7849 भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

and requesting to correct his date of birth right from the datewhen hecame to know after going through the service excerpt. No doubt, the petitioner has signed Form-B he had explained as mentioned above and it is under challenged since 1999. in my view the case ofthe Petitioner covers under the provision of I - 1-76 ofNCWA-Ill and the management ought to have consider its request affirmatively. There is a sufficient record and certificates disclosing his date of birth as 12-10-1953 and it ought to have corrected by the management . Since it has failed it will be proper to issue direction to the management to correct it . Consequently the action of the management in not correctingthe date of birth and directing him to retire treating his date of birth as 1-10-1950 is illegal . The management is directed to correct the date of birth ofthe Petitioner from 1-10-1950 to 12-10-1953 and retire him consideringhis date ofbirth as 12-10-1953 only . He should be continued till that period on the same post. Hence | pass this affirmative award.

A. N. YADAV, Presiding Officer

नईदिल्ली, 9 नवम्बर, 2009

का.अ. 3295:-कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34 ) की धास । की उपधारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रस्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा । दिसम्बर , 2009 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी हैं) अध्याय-5 और 6 [ धारा 76 की उपधारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77 , 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले ही प्रवृत्त हो चुकी हैं ] के उपबंध आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत होंगे , अर्थात्: - retirement and now he is making hurry by filing the application for correcting his date of birth but his fact is not correctbecause he has raised the issue requestingto correet his date ofbirth as 12-10-1953 right from the year 1999 and earlier to it . He has raised the issue of correcting hisdate of birth which was wrongly mentioned as 1-10-1953 under his letter 7-12-1999 and 25-3-1999 . However, the management did not appear even before ALC in cancilation proceeding. The report of the ALC indicates that the management did not attend the meeting and even cooperated the petitioner or proceeding before him. Therefore , the dispute was not solved and the reference was made to this Tribunal. However , his report shows that the submissions of the petitioner were correct onthe basis ofdocument submitted by him . The Petitioner has submitted the documents like Primary School Certificate , Middle Class Passed Certificate of Haushangabad Board, Certificate from the Principal of Higher Secondary School , Damua, again the transfer certificate issued by the Principal . All these certificates aresupporting i.e. date ofbirth is 12-10-1953 . The Primary School Certificate is dated 1-5-1967 which is issued even before his appointment because his first appointment was as a Loader in the year 1973. He has based his representation for correcting the date of birth on the basis ofpassing 8th Class i.e. Middle School Passed Certificate. Sincethe certificate is ofthe date earlier to his appointment itcarriesa sufficient weight and even in the representation also he has mentioned to correct his date of birth as 12-10- 1953 in place of 1-10-1950 . It seems that the Petitioner is requesting the management by variious letters right from the year 1987 but the management did not care to correct. hisdate ofbirth and it has never decided his representation.

" आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य के रंगारेड्‌डी जिले के इब्राहीमपट्टणम मण्डल में स्थित इब्राहीमपट्टणम नगर, शेरगूडा, चिंतलपल्ली, मंगलपल्ली, पटेलगूडा, बोंगुलूरू एवं आदिबट्‌ला राजस्व गांव के सीमा केअन्तर्गत आने वाले सभी क्षेत्र । "

[सं. एस-38013/46/2009- एस.एस. - 1 ] एस. डी. जेवियर, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 9th November, 2009

S.O. 3295:-In exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the Ist December, 2009 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter-V and VI [ except sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Andhra Prasesh namely 7. The provision laid down in Para - 1.1 No. 76 ofthe NCWA - III the sanctity of the certificates issued from the university, board and institution prior to the appointment isrecognized.Here the petitioner has filed two certificates which are prior to his appointment . The originals are already submitted to the managementagement and he has produced Xerox and attested copies of them . They are showing his dateofbirth as 12-10-1953 . They support his claim. Earlier to it on his transfer to Damua Colliery he had applied to the management for correction of the date and he had objected recording the date of birth as 1-10-1950 . However, hisrepresentation was not attended . It appears that the. provision ofNCWA- III as mentioned above , are making it obligatory on the management to correct the date of birth onthe basis of certificate issued by university, board and institute. The same certificates were submitted by him but the management for the reason best known to it, has not taken any action .

"All the areas falling within the limits of revenue villages of Ibrahimpatnam Town , Sherguda, Chintalpally, Mangalpally, Patelguda, Bonguluru and Adibatla in Ibrahimpatnam mandal of Ranga Reddy district ofAndhra Pradesh . "

8. The counsel for the management mostly harping on the Form-B signed by the petitioner by saying that he has accepted the date of birth but this cannot be a case of the petitioner or the management because he was resisting

[No. S-38013/46/2009- S.S . 1 ] S. D. XAVIER , Under Secy .

4233G1/09-23 7850

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009 / AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 10 नवम्बर , 2009

नई दिल्ली, 10 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3296.-जबकि मैसर्स एस्कोर्ट्स हार्ट इंस्टिटयूट एण्ड रिसर्च सेन्टर लि. [दिल्ली ( दक्षिण ) क्षेत्र में कोड संख्या डी. एल/ 13644 के अंतर्गत ] ( एतदुपरान्त प्रतिष्ठान के रूप में संदर्भित ) ने कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध अधिनियम, 1952 ( 1952 का 19 ) (एतदुपरान्त अधिनियम के रूप में संदर्भित ) की धारा 17 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अंतर्गत छूट के लिए आवेदन दिया है ।

का.आ. 3297.-जबकि मैसर्स करम चन्द थापर एण्ड ब्रादर्स [कोल सेल्स ] लि. [ कोलकाता क्षेत्र में कोड संख्या डब्ल्यूबी/ 8219 के अंतर्गत ] ( एतदुपरान्त प्रतिष्ठान के रूप में संदर्भित ) ने कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध अधिनियम , 1952 ( 1952 का 19 ) (एतदुपरान्त अधिनियम के रूप में संदर्भित ) की धारा 17 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अंतर्गत छूट के लिए आवेदन दिया है ।

2. और जबकि , केन्द्र सरकार के विचार में अंशदान दर के मामले में उक्त प्रतिष्ठान के भविष्य निधि के नियम उसके कर्मचारियों के लिए उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 में विनिर्दिष्ट की तुलना में कम हितकर नहीं है और कर्मचारी भी समान प्रकृति के किसी अन्य प्रतिष्ठान के कर्मचारियों के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम या कर्मचारी भविष्य निधियोजना , 1952 ( एतदुपरान्त प्रतिष्ठान के रूप में संदर्भित ) के अंतर्गत अन्य भविष्य निधि लाभ भी प्राप्त कर रहे हैं । 2. और जबकि, केन्द्र सरकार के विचार में अंशदान दर के मामले में उक्त प्रतिष्ठान के भविष्य निधि के नियम उसके कर्मचारियों के लिए उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 में विनिर्दिष्ट की तुलना में कम हितकर नहीं है और कर्मचारी भी समान प्रकृति के किसी अन्य प्रतिष्ठान के कर्मचारियों के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम या कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि योजना , 1952 ( एतदुपरान्त प्रतिष्ठान के रूप में संदर्भित ) के अंतर्गत अन्य भविष्य निधि लाभ भी प्राप्त कर रहे हैं ।

3. केन्द्र सरकार एतद्द्वारा , अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 17 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए तथा इस संबंध में समय - समय पर विनिर्दिष्ट शर्तों को ध्यान में रखते हुए , उक्त प्रतिष्ठान को उक्त योजना के समस्त उपबंधों के प्रचालन से 01-05-1962 से अगली अधिसूचना तक के लिए छूट प्रदान करती है ।

3. केन्द्र सरकार एप्तद्वारा , अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 17 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए तथा इस संबंध में समय- समय पर विनिर्दिष्ट शर्तों को ध्यान में रखते हुए , उक्त प्रतिष्ठान को उक्त योजना के समस्त उपबंधों के प्रचालन से 18-09-1991 से अगली अधिसूचना तक के लिए छूट प्रदान करती है ।

[सं. एस-35015/34/2009- एस.एस- II ] [सं. एस-35015/1/2009- एस.एस- II ]

एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव

एस. डी. जेवियर, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 10th November , 2009 New Delhi , the 10th November , 2009

S.O. 3297.- Whereas M/s . Karam Chand Thapar & Bros.[Coal Sales ] Ltd. [under Code No. WB/8219 in Kolkata Region] (hereinafter referred to as the establishment ) has applied for exemption under clause (a) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the Employees ' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 ( 19 of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) .

S.O. 3296.- Whereas M/ s . Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre Ltd. [under Code No. DL/ 13644 in . Delhi ( South ) Region ] ( hereinafter referred to as the establishment ) has applied for exemption under clause (a) ofsub-section ( 1 ) of Section 17 ofthe Employees ' Provident Funds andMiscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 ( 19 of 1952 ) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) .

2. And whereas in the opinion of the Central Government, the rules of the provident fund of the said establishment with respect to the rates of contribution are not less favourable to employees therein than those specified in Section 6 of the said Act and the employees are also in enjoyment of other provident fund benefits provided under the said Act or under the Employees ' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 ( hereinafter referred to as the Scheme) in relation to the employees in any other establishment of similar character.

2. And whereas in the opinion of the Central Government , the rules of the provident fund of the said establishment with respect to the rates of contribution are not less favourable to employees therein than those specified in Section 6 of the said Act and the employees are also in enjoyment of other provident fund benefits provided under the said Act or under the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 ( hereinafter referred to as the Scheme) in relation to the employees in any other establishment of similar character .

3. Now, therefore , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by clause ( a) of sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in this regard from time to time , the Central Government, hereby , exempts the said establishment from the operation of all the provisions of the said Scheme with effect from 18-09-1991 until further notification.

3. Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the said Act and subjectto the conditions specified in this regard from time to time, the Central Government , hereby , exempts the said establishment from the operation of all the provisions ofthe said Scheme with effect from 01-05-1962 until further notification .

[No. S- 35015/34/2009- SS-II ] S. D. XAVIER , Under Secy .

[No. S- 35015/1/2009 -SS- II ] S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy .

7851 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 10 नवम्बर , 2009

was not accepted by the management , he raised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer. Since conciliation proceedings came to an end , the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , vide Order No. L-42012/ 33/2006- IR( DU), New Delhi , dated 09-10-2006 with following terms:

का.आ. 3298.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सी. पी. डब्ल्यू. डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. - 1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 79/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the demand ofAll India CPWD ( M.R.M. ) Karamchari Sangathan for regularization of service ofShri Girish Chand , Beldar, w.e.f. 14-6-1984 is legal and justified ? If yes , to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to ? י

[सं. एल-42012/33/2006- आई आर ( डौ यू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 10th November , 2009

S.O. 3298.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 79/ 2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , No. 1 , New Delhi , as shown in the Annexure in the Industrialustrial Dispute between the employers in relation tothe management of C. P. W. D. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 10-11-2009.

[No.L-42012/33/2006-IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT No. I, NEW DELHI, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX DELHI

I. D. No. 79/2006

Workman

Shri Girish Chand, Beldar through All India CPWD (MRM) Karamchari Sangathan , House No. 4823 , Gali No. 13 , Balbir Nagar Extention, Shahdara , New Delhi- 110032

Versus

2. Claim Statement was filed on behalf of workman , pleading therein that he was employed as daily rated workmanw.e.f. 14-6-84 on muster roll as Beldar . It was projected that his services were regularized w.e.f. 25-4-95 . He rendered 240 days continuous service with the management from the date of his employment till the date of his regularization. There are three wings under CPWD viz, Electrical , Civil and Horticulture , where several daily rated workmen are employed by the management . The Apex Court in Surinder Singh's case [ 1986( 1) SCC 639 ] gave a command to the management to regularize services of its daily rated workmen , from the date of their initial employment, who have put in six months of continuous service. Accordingly Director General ( Works ) , CPWD issued order dated 25-8-88 for regularization of muster roll employees . Horticulture wing of the management regularized service of its daily rated workmen by 7-12-88 , while Electrical and Civil wings did not take any action in thisbehalf. The workman is covered under the provisios of thePayment of Gratuity Act, 1972 ( in short the Act ) and orders were issued in that regard by the management on 26-6-2006 . Ram Khilari , a similarly situated workman , raised an industrial dispute and Industrial Tribunal , Govemment ofNCT, Delhi , gave an award for regularization of his services from the date of his initial employment. Workman iseligible for regularization of services from the date ofhis initial employment . It has been claimed that the management maybe commanded to regularize his services from the date ofhisinitial employment .

1. The Superintending Engineer, Coord. Circle(Elect .) CPWD, East Block , R. K. Puram, New Delhi .

2. The Executive Engineer, ' P' Division , CPWD, Enquiry Complex, Andrews Ganj , NewDelhi .

......Management

AWARD

1. Girish Chandjoined services with CPWD as Beldar w.e.f. 14-6-84 . He rendered continuous service of240 days and his services were regularized in the post of Beldar w.e.f. 25-4-95 . He claimed regularization of his services from the date ofhis initial employment. When his demand

3. Contest was given to the claim statement pleading therein that the workman was working on muster roll with the management and his services were regularized from the datementionedby him in the claim statement. His contention thathe iseligible for regularization of his services from the date of his initial engagement , is false . The Apex Court in Surinder Singh's case (supra ) never directed the management to regularize services of muster roll employees from the date oftheir initial employment . In compliance of the order handed down by the Apex Court , 8982 posts were created in September, 1992 and thereafter all workers were regularized in services from prospective dates and not from the date of their initial engagement in various precedent Apex Court ruled that employees selected on dailywages nowhere automatically become regular from [PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] 7852

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

the date of their initial employment, even if they perform duties similar to the regular employees . The workman cannot claim regularization from the back date . When vacancy was available for him, his services were regularized. It has been projected that his claim for regularization from the date ofhis initial employment is false.

service paid from contingencies should be allowed to count for persion and if so to what extent has been considered in the National Council and in pursuance ofthe recomendation of the Council , it has been decided that half the service paid from contingencies will be allowed to count towards pension at the time of absorption in regular employment subject to the following conditions , viz .--

(a) Service paid from contingencies should have been, in ajab involving whole-time employment (and not part-time for a portion of the day) .

(b) Service paid from contingencies should be in a type of work or job for which regular posts could have beensanctioned, e.g. malis , chowkidars , khalasis , etc. 4. During the course of adjudication , Shri Satish Kumar Sharma, General Secretary of All India CPWD (M.R.M. ) Karamchari Sangathan, who was authorized representative of the workman , made a statement on his behalf that the workman does not press hisclaim for regularization in the services from the date of his initial employment . Consequently, it is evident that the workman gave up the contest of his demand for regularization of his services from the date of his initial employment.

(c) The service should have been one for which the payment is made either on monthly or daily rates computed and paid on a montly basis and which though not analogous to the regular scale of pay should bear some relation in the matter of pay to those being paid for similar jobsbeing performed by staffs in regular establishments .

(d) The service paid from contingencies should have been continuous and followed by abosrption in regular employment without a break.

(e) Subject to the above conditions being fulfilled, theweightage for past service paid from contingencies will be limited to the period after Ist January, 196.1 for which authentic records of service maybe available . Reference can be made to office memorandum No. G.I. M.F. , O.M . No. 12 ( 1 ) -EV/68, dated the 14th May, 1968.

5. Circular No. 29/77/2000- ECX , New Delhi , dated 26-6-2006 was issued by the Director General (Works), CPWD, in respect of payment of gratuity to its casual , hand receipt and muster roll workers under the Act. The said circular makes it clear that the matter was examined in consultation with the Ministry of Urban Development and Ministry of Labour and it was clarified that the Act is applicable to casual, muster roll , hand receipt and daily rated workers ofthe CPWD. Consequently , all ADVS , CS , SCS , S. C. Coordination, Executive Engineer, Directorate of Horticulture, Additional Directorate of Horticulture , Deputy Director of Horticulture , All Deputy Welfare Labour Commissioners and Assistant Labour Welfare Commissioners were requested to make payment ofgratutiy to casual muster roll , hand receipt and daily rated workers of CPWD as admissible under the Act . It was further mentioned therein that the current/pending court cases on the similar issue may be defended or got settled accordingly. Therefore, it is evident that the management admits the claim of all casual muster roll , hand receipt or daily rated workers of the CPWD for payment of gratuity under the Act .

7. Here in this case it is not a matter of dipute that the wrkman , who was paid from contingencies , was performing whole time job with the management since 14-6-1984 . His services were regularized on 25-4-95. Ile performed functions analogous to regular employees till the date of his regularization . His services with the mamagement were continuous without any break . Ile satisfied all the conditions laid down in the aforesaid office memorandum issued by the Govt . of India. Hence , the management is under an obligation to comply the said office memorandum and count service of the workman for the purpose of pension .

6. Whether servcice rendered by workman , which was paid from contingency, can be counted towards persion? For an answer , provisions of CCS Pension Rules , 1972 ( in short the Rules ) are tobe considered . Rule 14 ofthe said Rule makes provsions in that regard. It emerge out ofthe provisions of Rule 14 that periods of serice paid from contingencies do not count as qualifying service for persion. Howeyer , Govt . of India took a decision in May, 1968 and an office memorandum was issued on 14-5-1968 , wherein it is detailed that in some cases , employees paid from contingencies , employed in types of work requiring service of whole- time workers and are paid on monthly rates of pay or daily rates couputed and paid on monthly basis and on being found fit brought on to regular establishment . The question whether in such cases

8. In view of the fact that contest was given up by workman for regularisation of his services from the date of initial employment and the management is under an obligation to comply the aforesaid circular and the Rules , it isexpedientto command the management to record services renderedby Girish Chand as muster roll employee in his service book , which services would be taken into account for payment of gratuity under the Act, at the time of his superannuation or death , as the contingency arise as well as for calculation of qualifying service for pension under [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

the Pesion Rules 1972. An award is accordingly passed . It may be sent to the appropriate Government for publication.

Dated:4-11-2009

7853

भारत का राजपत्र दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14, 1931

Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 10 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3299.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सी. पी. डब्ल्यू डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 82/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -42011 /32/2006- आई आर (डीयू) ] सुरेन्द्रसिंह , डेस्कअधिकारी New Delhi , the 10th November, 2009 S.O. 3299 ,-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 82/2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, No. I , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of C.P.W.D. and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 10-11-2009 .

not accepted by the management , he raised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer. Since conciliation proceedings came to an end, the appropriate Government referred the dispute tothis Tribunal for adjudication, vide order No.L-42011/32/2006 -IR( DU) NewDelhi , dated 16-10- 2006with following terms:

"Whether the demand of the All India CPWD (M.R.M.) Karamchari Sangathan for regularization ofservices ofShri Amar Singh, Beldar, fromthe date ofhisinitial appointment on muster roll is legal and justified? Ifyes , to what reliefthe workman is entitled to and from which date ? "

[No. L-42011 /32/2006- IR (DU)]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX DELHI

I. D. No. 82/2006

Shri Amar Singh , Beldar through The General Secretary , All India CPWD (MRM) Karamchari Sangathan , House No. 4823 , Gali No. 13 , Balbir Nagar Extension , Shahdara, New Delhi - 110032

...Workman

Versus

1. The Superintending Engineer, Coordination Circle (Elect. ), CPWD, East Block R. K. Puram , NewDelhi

2. Claim statement was filed on behalf of the workman, pleading therein that he was employed as daily rated workman w.e.f. 20-1-81 on muster roll as Beldar . It was projected that his services were regularized w.e.f. 6-1-86. He rendered 240 days continuous service with the management from the date of his employment till the date of his regularization . There are three wings under CPWD viz. Electrical , Civil and Horticulture, where several daily rated workmen are employed by the management. The Apex Court in Surinder Singh's case [ 1986( 1 ) SCC 639 ] gave a command to the management to regularize services of its daily rated workmen , from the date of their initial employment, who have put in six months of continuous service. Accordingly Director General ( Works ), CPWD issued order dated 25-8-88 for regularization ofmuster roll employees . Horticulture wing of the management regularized service of its daily rated workmen by 7-12-88 while Electrical and Civil wings did not any action in his behalf. The workman is covered under the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (in short the Act) and orders were issued in that regared by the management on 26-6-2006, Ram Khilari a similarly situated workman, raised an industrial dispute and Industrial Tribunal , Government of NCT, Delhi , gave an award for regularization of his services from the date of his initial employment . Workman is eligible for regularization ofservices from the date ofhis initial employment. It has been claimed that the management maybe commanded to regularize his services from the date of his initial employment .

....Management

AWARD

Amar Singh joined services with CPWD as Beldar w.e.f. 20-1-81 . He rendered continuous service 240days and his service were regularized in the post of Beldar w.e.f. 6-1-86. He claimed regularization ofhis services from the date ofhis initial employment. When his demandwas 3. Contest was given to the claim statement pleading therein that the workman was working on muster roll with the management and his services were regularized from the date mentioned by him in the claim statement . His contention that he is eligible for regularization of his services from the date of his initial engagement , is false. The Apex Court in Surinder Singh's case (supra) never directed the management to regularize services of muster rollemployees from the date of their initial employment. In compliance of the order handed down by the Apex Court , 8982 posts were created in September, 92 and thereafter all workerswere regularized in services from prospective dates 7854

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

and not from the date of their initial engagement . In various precedents Apex Court ruled that employees selected on daily wages nowhere automatically become regular from the date of their initial employment , even if they perform duties similar to the regular employees . The workman cannot claim regularization from back date . When vacancy was available for him , his services were regularized . It has been projected that his claim for regularization from the date of his initial employment is false .

4. During the course of adjudication , Shri Satish Kumar Sharma, General Secretary , of All India CPWD (M.R.M. ) Karamchari Sangathan , who was authorized representative of the workman , made a statement on his behalf that the workman does not press his claim for regularization in the services from the date of his initial employment. Consequently, it is evident that the workman gave up the contest of his demand for regularization ofhis services from the date of his initial employment .

5. Circular No. 29/ 77 /2000 - ECX , New Delhi , dated 26-6-2006 was issued by the Director General ( Works ), in CPWD, in respect of payment of gratuity to its casual , hand receipt and muster roll workers under the Act . The said circular makes it clear that the matter was examined in consultation with the Ministry of Urban Development and Ministry of Labour and it was clarified that the Act is applicable to casual , muster roll , hand receipt and daily rated workers of the CPWD . Consequently all ADVS , CS , SCS, S.C. Coordination , Executive Engineer, Directorate of Horticulture , Additional Directorate of Horticulture, Deputy Director of Horticulture, All Deputy Welfare Labour Commissioners and Assistant Labour Welfare Commissioners were requested to make payment of gratuity to casual muster roll , hand receipt and daily rated workers of CPWD as admissible under the Act . It was further mentioned therein that the current/pending court cases on the similar issue may be defended or got settled accordingly . Therefore, it is evident that the management admits the claim of all casual muster roll , hand receipt or daily rated workers of the CPWD for payment of gratuity under the Act .

6. Whether service rendered by the workman , which was paid from contingency, canbe counted towards pension? For an answer , provisions of CCS Pension Rules, 1972 ( in short the Rules ) are to be considered. Rule 14 ofthe said Rules makes provision in that regard . It emerges out of the provisions of Rule 14 that periods of service paid from contingencies do not count as qualifying service for pension . However Government of India took a decision in May, 1968 and an office memorandum was issued on 14-5-1968 , wherein it is detailed that in some cases , employees paid from contingencies , employed in types of work requiring services of whole - time workers and are paid on monthly rates of pay or daily rates

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ] computed and paid on monthly basis and on being found fit brought on to regular establishment . The question whether in such cases service paid from contingencies should be allowed to count for pension and if so to what extent has been considered in the National Council and in pursuance of the recommendation of the Council , it has been decided that half the service paid from contingencies will be allowed to count toward pension at the time of absorption in regular employment subject to the following conditions , viz :-

(a) Service paid from contingencies should have been, in a job involving whole-time employment ( and not part- time for a portion of the day) .

(b) Service paid from contingencies should be in a type of work or job for which regular posts could have been sanctioned , e.g. , malis , chowkidars , khalasis , etc.

( c) The service should have been one for which the payment is made either on monthly or daily rates computed and paid on a monthly basis and which though not analogous to the regular scale of pay should bear some relation in the matter of pay to those being paid for similar jobs being performed by staffs in regular establishments.

(d). The service paid from contingencies should have been continuous and followed by absorption in regular employment without a break.

(e) Subject to the above conditions being fulfilled, the weightage for past service paid from contingencies will be limited to the period after Ist January, 1961 for which authentic records of service may be available . Reference can be made to office memorandum No. G.l. , M. F. , O. M. No. 12 ( 1 )-EV/68 , dated the 14th May, 1968.

7. Here in this case it is not a matter of dispute that the workman, who was paid from contingencies , was performing whole time job with the management since 20-1-81 . His services were regularized on 6-1-86. Не performed functions analogous to regular employees till the date of his regularization . His services with the management were continuous without any break . He satisfied all the conditions laid down in the aforesaid office memorandum issued by the Government of India. Hence the management is under an obligation to comply the said office memorandum and count service of the workman for the purpose of pension.

8. Inview of the fact that contest was given up by the workman for regularisation of his services from the date of initial employment and the management is under an obligation to comply the aforesaid circular and the Rules, it is expedient to command the management to record services rendered by Amar Singh as muster roll employec in his service book , which services would be taken into 7855 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

1998 , by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( hereinafter referred to as the Act) , referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal;

account for payment of gratuity under the Act, at the time of his superannuation or death , as the contingency arise aswell as for calculation of qualifying service for pension under the Pension Rules , 1972. An award is accordingly passed. It may be sent to the appropriate Government for publication.

Dated:4-11-2009 Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 10 नवम्बर , 2009

"Whether there existed employer - employec relationship Between Sh . Naresh Kumar Watchman and the Management of FCI ? If yes , whether the termination of services of Sh . Naresh Kumar w.e.f. 18-12-95 is legal and justified? If not , to what relicf is he entitled ?"

का.आ. 3300.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एफ. सी. आई. के प्रबंधत्रंत के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 66/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-11-2009 को प्राप्त \ हुआ था ।

2. Case repeatedly called , None appeared for the workman despite notice it is already 1 P.M. If appears that workman is not interested to pursue his case . In view of the above as none is appearing on behalf of the workman nor the workman is present, I have no option but to return the reference for want of prosecution . Central Govt .be informed. File be consigned.

[सं. एल-22012/33/1997- आईआर ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

Chandigarh 5-11-09

New Delhi , the 10th November, 2009

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 10 नवम्बर , 2009

S.O. 3300.-In purusuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 66/98) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour Court ,No. 1, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relationto the management of FCI and their workman , which was received bythe Central Government on 10-11-2009.

का.आ. 3301.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एफ. सी. आई. के प्रबंधत्रंत के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार अधिकरण नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 64/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [No.L-22012/33/ 1997 -IR (C -II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

[सं. एल-22012/34/ 1997- आई.आर. (सी- II ) ] ANNEXURE

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 10th November , 2009 BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA- PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT NO. I, CHANDIGARH

Case I. D. No. 66 of98

Sh. Naresh Kumar C/o Sh . Ram Mehar Singh S/o Sh . Suraj Mal R/o No. 1652, Urban Estate , Jind- 126102

Versus

S.O. 3301.-In purusuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 64/98) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, No. I , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of FCI and their workman , which was received bythe Central Government on 10-11-2009.

TheDistt.Manager, Food Corporation of India, Rohtak .

APPEARANCES

Forthe workman : None .

[No. L-22012/34/ 1997 - IR (C - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

For the management : Sh . Parmod Jain

AWARD

Passed on 5-11-2009

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT NO . 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case I. D. No. 64 of 98

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour, vide notification No. L- 22012/33 /97 - IR (C- II ) dated 11th March , 7856

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

New Delhi , the 10th November , 2009

Sh . Jai Bhagwan C/o Sh. Ram Mehar Singh

S/o Sh . Suraj Mal

R/ o No. 1652, Urban Estate, Jind.

Versus

TheDistt. Manager , Food Corporation of India, Rohtak.

APPEARANCES

S.O. 3302.-In purusuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 68/98 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, No. I, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of FCI and their workman , which was received bythe Central Government on 10-11-2009 .

[No. L -22012/31 / 1997 -IR ( C - II ) ] For theworkman

: None.

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer : Sh . Parmod Jain

For the management

ANNEXURE

AWARD

Passed on 5-11-2009

BEFORE SHRIGYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT

NO. 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case 1. D. No. 68 of98

Sh . Shamsher C/o Sh . Ram Mehar Singh S/o Sh . Suraj Mal R/o No. 1652 , Urban Estate, Jind .

Government of India , Ministry of Labour, vide notification No. L- 22012/34/97- IR (C- 11) dated 11th March , 1998, by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ), referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal,..

Versus

The Distt.Manager, Food Corporation of India , Rohtak .

APPEARANCES

For the workman

: None .

For the management : Sh: Parmod Jain

"Whether there existed employer- employee relationship Between Sh . Jai Bhagwan Watchman and the management of FCI ? If yes , whether the termination of services of Sh . Jai Bhagwan w.e.f. 18-12-95 is legal and justified? Ifnot , to what reliefis he entitled?"

AWARD

Passed on 5-11-2009

2. Case repeatedly called, None appeared for the workman despite notice it is already 1 P.M. If appears that workman is not interested to pursue his case . In view of the above as none is appearing on behalf of the workman nor the workman is present, I have no option but to return the reference for want of prosecution . Central Govt . be informed. File be consigned.

TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour , vide notification No. L- 22012/31/97 - IR (C- II ) dated 11th March , 1998, by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) , referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal ;

Chandigarh

5-11-09

G.K. SHARMA, PresidingOfficer

"Whether there existed employer - employee relationship Between Sh . Shamsher Watchman and the management of FCI ? If yes , whether the termination of services of Sh . Shamsher , w.e.f. 18-12-95 is legal and justified ? If not, towhat relief is he entitled?"

नई दिल्ली, 10 नवम्बर, 2009

2. Case repeatedly called , None appeared for the workmandespite notice it is already | P.M. If appears that workman is not interested to pursue his case . In view of the above as none is appearing on behalf of the workman nor the workman is present , I have no option but to return the reference for want of prosecution . Central Govt. be informed . File be consigned.

का.आ. 3302, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकारएफ. सी. आई. के प्रबंधयंत के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच. अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सस्कार अधिकरण नं. 1 चण्डीगढ़ , के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सं. 68/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Chandigarh

5-11-09

[सं. एल-22012/31/ 1997- आईआर ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer 7857 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 10 नवम्बर , 2009

"Whether there existed employer- employee relationship Between Sh. Jasbir Singh Watchman and the management of FCI . If yes , whether the termination of services of Sh . Jasbir Singh w.e.f. 18-12-95 is legal and justified? If not , to what relief is he entitled ? "

का.आ. 3303.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं एफ.सी.आई. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 62/98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/28/1997-आई. आर. ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

2. Case repeatedly called . None appeared for the workman despite notice . It is already | P.M. It appears that workman is not interested to pursue his case. In view of the above as none is appearing on behalf of the workman nor the workman is present , I have no option but to return the reference for want of prosecution . Central Government be informed. File be consigned .

New Delhi , the 10th November , 2009

Chandigarh

Dated: 5-11-09

GK . SHARMA, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , ।। नवम्बर , 2009

S.O. 3303.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 62/98) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court, No. - 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of FCI and their workman , which was received bytheCentral Government on 10-11-2009.

[No. L- 22012/28/ 1997 - IR ( C - II ) ]

AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

का.आ. 3304.-जबकि मैसर्स मैकेन एरिक्सन ( इंडिया ) प्रा. लि. [दिल्ली ( दक्षिण ) क्षेत्र में कोड संख्या डी. एल/8979 के अंतर्गत ] ( एतदुपरान्त प्रतिष्ठान के रूप में संदर्भित ) ने कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध अधिनियम , 1952 ( 1952 का 19) (एतदुपरान्त अधिनियम के रूप में संदर्भित ) की धारा 17 की उप-- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अंतर्गत छूट के लिए आवेदन दिया है । BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT NO. 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case No. 1.D. 62 of98

Sh . Jasbir Singh C/ o Sh. Ram Mehar Singh S/o Sh . Suraj Mal R/ o House No. 1652,

V/ s.

The Distt. Manager ,

Food Corporation of India, Rohtak

APPEARANCES

3. केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा , अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 17 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए तथा इस संबंध में समय- समय पर विनिर्दिष्ट शतों को ध्यान में रखते हुए , उक्त प्रतिष्ठान को उक्त योजना के समस्त उपबंधों के प्रचालन से 01-03-1989 से अमली अधिसूचना तक के लिए छूट प्रदान करती है ।

: None

For the workman

[सं. एस-35015 /30/2009- एस.एस II ) | For the management : Sh. Parmod Jain

एस. डी. जेवियर, अवर सचिव AWARD

New Delhi , the 11th November , 2009

Passed on 5-11-2009

S.O. 3304. Whereas M/s . Mc CANN Erickson (India) Pvt . Ltd. { under Code No. DL/8979 in Delhi (South) Region ] (hereinafter referred to as the establishment ) has applied for exemption under clause (a) ofsub- section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the Employees ' Provident l'unds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 ( 19 of 1952) ( hereinafter referred to as the Act ).

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide notification No. L - 22012/28/97/IR(C - II) dated 11th March , 1998 , by exercising its powers under Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( hereinafter referred to as the Act ) , referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribuanal :

4233 G1/09-24 7858

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

...Workman

Sh . Bhagwan Sahai and 29 others , through All India CPWD (MRM) Karamchari Sangathan, House No. 4823 , Gali No. 13 , Balbir Nagar Extension , Shahdara, New Delhi - 110032

Versus

1. The Superintending Engineer ,

2. And whereas in the opinion of the Central Government , the rules of the provident fund of the said establishment with respect to the rates of contribution are not less favourable to employees therein than those specified in Section 6 of the said Act and the employees are also in enjoyment of other provident fund benefits provided under the said Act or under the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 ( hereinafter referred to as the Scheme) in relation to the employees in any other establishment of similar character.

Estate Block , R.K. Puram ,

Coord. Cercle (Elect. ) , CPWD, NewDelhi .

2. The Executive Engineer ,

' A' Division, CPWD ,

I.P. Bhawan,

NewDelhi.

...Management

AWARD

3. Now, therefore , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by clause (a) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in this regard from time to time , the Central Government, hereby, exempts the said establishment from the operation of all the provisions of the said Scheme with effect from 1-3-1989 until further notification .

[No. S- 35015/30/2009 - SS- II ] S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 11 नवम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 3305.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.पी.डब्ल्यू.डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 15/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -42012/29/2006- आई आर ( डी.यू. ) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 11th November , 2009

S.O. 3305. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 15/ 2007) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , No. - 1 , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure , inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of C.P.W.D. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 11-11-2009 .

[No. L-42012/29/2006 - IR (DU) ]

SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT NO . 1 , NEW DELHI , KARKARDOOMA COURT, COMPLEX DELHI

I.D. 15 of 2007

Shri Bhagwan Sahai S/ o Shri Gyarsa joined services with CPWD as Beldar ( now Carpenter) w.e.f. 7-9-79 . He rendered continuous service of 240 days and his services were regularized in the post of Carpenter w.e.f. 4-3-86 . S/ Shri Satish Kumar S /o Hukam Chand joined as Beldar on 22-12-80 and regularized on 20-6-88 . Tirpal S/ o Abhay Ram joined as Beldar on 1-12-81 and regularized on 15-4-91 , Raj Pal S /o Shri Kori Lal joined as Beldar on 21-4-81 and was regularized on 5-7-91 , Babu Lal S /o Shri Attar Singh joined asBeldar on 9-11-82 and was regularized on 24-12-92 , Shiv Kumar S/ o Shri Khaieran joined as Beldar on 16-6-83 and was regularized on 16-2-93 , Gangesh Chand Tiwari S/ o Girdhari Lal Tiwari joined as Beldar on 2-5-82 and was regularized on 12-2-93 , Bihari Lal S/o Shri Kishan Lal joined as Beldar on 22-8-83 and was regularized on 16-2-93 , Mohan S/ o Shri Bengali joined as Beldar on 3-12-79 and was regulrized on 5-2-93 , Bishamber S/o Shri Manfool joined as Beldar on 22-7-83 and was regularized on 16-2-93 Kalicharan S/ o Shri Kalla joined as Beldar on 21-9-83 and was regularized on 16-2-93 , Suresh Chand S / o Shri Tek Chand joined as Beldar on 25-1-86 and was regularized on 1-6-96, Ram Pal S/ o Shri Nathu Ram joined as Beldar on 21-10-84 and was regularized on 10-6-93 , Birpal S /o Shri Ram Singh joined as Beldar on 12-10-81 and was regularized on 1-5-91 , Tejpal S /a Shri Shankar Lal joined as Beldar on 1-1-81 and was regularized on 4-7-89 , Manohar Lal S/ o Shri Ganesh Ram joined as Beldar on 21-9-83 and was regularized on 2-4-93 , Batan Singh S / o Shri Ganga Ram joined as Beldar on 2-12-79 and was regularized on 17-6-87 , Nanak Chand S/o Shri Ram Chander joined as Beldar on 1-10-79 andwas regularized on 5-3-86 , Smt . Shanti W/ o Shri Shiv Chand joined as Beldar on 8-4-76 and was regularized on 5-1-85, Oin Parkash S / o Shri Nhutam Lal joined as Beldar on 13-1-83 and was regularized on 10-12-92, Hari Singh S / o Shri Chater Singh joined as Beldar on 1-6-81 and was regularized on 18-6-91 , Kanwar Pal Singh S /o Shri Kachedumal joined as Beldar an 22-3-79 and was regularized on 19-4-91 , Jai Kishan S/o Shri Mangat Ram joined as Beldar [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

7859

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

regularize their services from the date of their initial employment.

on 29-5-84 and was regularized on 21-5-93 , Bhogi Ram S/ o Shri Devi Ram joined as Beldar on 25-10-79 and was regularized on 18-3-86, Dayal Singh S / o Shri Mangal Singh joined as Beldar on 19-9-79 and was regularized on 1-3-86, Jagpal S / o Shri Hukam Singh joined as Beldar on 2-7-82 and was regularized on 7-1-93 , Kishan Pal S /o Shri Khazan Singh joined as Beldar on 22-6-78 and was regularized on 13-5-82, Vinod Kumar S /o Mohan Lal , joined as Beldar on 23-2-82 and was regularized on 23-9-86 , Chet Ram S/o Shri MuratRamjoined as Beldar on 24-6-81 and was regularized on 9-2-87 , Baleshwar Mishra S/o Shri Sachinder Nath Mishrajoined as Beldar on 16-6-82 and was regularized on 11-12-92 . They claimed regularization of their services from the date of their initial employment . When their demand was not accepted by the management , they raised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer . Since conciliation proceedings came to an end, the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , vide order No. L-42012 /29 /2006 - IR (UD) New Delhi , dated 19-2-2007 with following terms:

3. Contest was given to the claim statement pleading therein that the workmen were working on muster roll with the management and their services were regularized from the date mentioned by them in Annexure 1 to the claim statement . Their contention that they are eligible for regularization oftheir services from the date of their initial engagement , is false. The Apex Court in Surinder Singh's case ( supra) never directed the management to regularize services of muster roll employees from the date of their initial employment . In compliance ofthe order handed down by the Apex Court , 8982 posts were created in September , 92 and thereafter all workers were regularized in services from prospective dates and not from the date of their initial engagement in various precedents Apex Court ruled that employees selected on daily wages nowhere automatically become regular from the date of their initial employment , eveniftheyperform duties similar to the regular employees . The workmen cannot claim regularization from the back date . When vacancies were available for them , their services were regularized . It has been projected that their claim for regularization from the date of their initial employment is false.

"Whether the demand of All India CPWD (M.R.M. ) . Karamchari Sangathan for regularization of services of Shri Bhagwan and 29 others , as per Annexure , from the date of their initial appointment on muster roll is legal and justified? If yes , to what relief the workmen concerned are entitled to?"

4. During the course of adjudication , Shri Satish Kumar Sharma, General Secretary, ofAll India CPWD (M.R.M. ) Karamchari Sangathan , who was authorized representative of the workmen , made a statement on their behalf that the workmen does not press his claim for regularization in the services from the date of their initial employment. Consequently , it is evident that the workmen gave up the contest of their demand for regularization of their services from the date of his initial employment.

5. Circular No. 29/77/ 2000 - ECX , New Delhi , dated 26-6-2006 was issued by the Director General ( Works ) , CPWD, in respect of payment of gratuity to its casual , hand receipt and muster roll workers under the Act . The said circular makes it clear that the matter was examined in consultation with the Ministry of Urban Development and Ministry of Labour and it was clarified that the Act is applicable to casual , muster roll , hand receipt and daily rated workers of the CPWD. Consequently all ADVs , CS , SCS , S.C. Coordination , Executive Engineer , Director of Horticulture , Additional Director of Horticulture , Deputy Director of Horticulture , All Deputy Welfare Labour Commissioners and Assistant Labour Welfare Commissioners were requested to make payment of gratuity to casual muster roll , hand receipt ar d daily rated workers of CPWD as admissible under the Act . It was further mentioned therein that the current/pending court on the similar issue may be defended or got settled accordingly. Therefore , it is evident tha the management admits the claim of all casual muster roll , hand receipt or daily rated workers of the CPWD for payment of gratuity under the Act.

2. Claim statement was filed on behalf of the workmen, pleading therein that they were employed as daily rated workmen from the dates as mentioned in para 1 above . It was projected that their services were regularized from the dates mentioned in para 1 above . They rendered 240 days continuous service with the management from the dateoftheir employment till the date of their regularization . There are three wings under CPWD viz . Electrical , Civil and Horticulture , where several daily rated workmen are employed by the management . The Apex Court in Surinder Singh's case ( 1986 ( 1 ) SCC 639 ) gave a command to the management to regularize services of its daily rated workmen, from the date of their initial employment , who have put in six months of continuous service . Accordingly Director General (Works) CPWD issued order dated 25-8- 88 for regularization of muster roll employees . Horticulture wing of the management regularized service of its daily rated workmenby 7-12-88 , while Electrical and Civil wings did not take any action in this behalf. The workman is covered under the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act , 1972 (in short the Act) and orders were issued in that regard by the management on 26-6-2006 . Ram Khilari , a similarly situated workman , raised an industrial dispute and Industrial Tribunal , Government of NCT, Delhi gave an award for regularization of his services from the date ofhis initial employment . Workmen are eligible for regularization of services from the date of their initial employment . It has been claimed that the management may be commanded to 7860

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

employees till the date of their regularization . Their services with the management were continuous without any break . They satisfied all the conditions laid down in the aforesaid office memorandum issued by the Government of India . Hence, the management is under an obligation to comply the said office memorandum and count service of the workmen for the purpose of pension .

8. In view of the fact that contest was given up by the workmen for regularization of their services from the dateof initial employment and the management is under an obligation to comply the aforesaid circular and the Rule , if isexpedient to command the management to record services rendered by Workmen as muster roll employee in their service book , which services would be taken into account for payment of gratuity under the Act, at the time of their superannuation or death , as the contigency arise as well as for calculation of qualifying service for pension under the Pension Rules, 1972. An award is accordingly passed. It may be sent to the appropriate Government for publication.

Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer 6. Whether service rendered by the workmen , which was paid from contingency canbe counted towards pension? For an answer, provisions ofCCS Pension Rules 1972 ( in short the Rules) are to be considered . Rule 14 of the said Rules makes provision in that regard. It emerge out of the provisions of Rule 14 that periods of service paid from contingencies do not count as qualifying service for pension. However Government of India took a decision in May, 1968 and an office memorandum was issued on 14-5-1968 , wherein it is detailed that in some cases , employees paid from contingencies , employed in types of work requiring services of whole-time workers and are paid on monthly rates ofpay or daily rates computed and paid on monthly basis and on being found fit brought on to regular establishment. The question whether in such cases service paid from contingencies should be allowedto count for pension and if so to what extent has been considered in theNational Council and pursuance ofthe recommendation of the Council , it has been decided that half the service paidfrom contingencies will be allowed to count toward pension at the time of absorption in regular employment subject tothe following conditions, viz.-

Dated:30-10-2009

नई दिल्ली , ।। नवम्बर , 2009

(a) Service paid from contingencies should havebeen, in ajob involving whole -time employment (and not part-time for a portion of theday) .

(b) Service paid from contingencies should be inatype ofwork orjob for which regular posts could have been sanctioned , e.g. , malis , Chowkidars , Khalasis, etc.

का.आ. 3306.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.पी.डब्ल्यू.डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. । नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 16/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जोकेन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -42012/28/2006- आई आर (डी.यू. ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 11th November, 2009 (c) The service should have been one forwhich the payment is made either on monthly or daily rates computed and paid on a monthly basis and which though not analogous to the regular scale of pay should bear some relation in the matter of pay to thosebeingpaid for similar jobs being performed by staffs in regular establishments .

(d) The service paid from contingencies should have been continuous and followed by absorption in regular employment without a break.

S.O. 3306. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 16/ 2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, No.- 1 , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation tothe management of C.P. W. D. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 11-11-2009 .

[No. L-42012/28 /2006- IR ( DU ) ] (e) Subject to the above conditions being fulfilled, the weightage for past service paid from contingencies will be limited to the period after Ist January, 1961 for which authentic nooonds of service may be available. Referance can be made to office memorandum No. G.L. , M.F. O.M. No. 12( 1 )-EV/68 , dated the 14th May, 1968.

SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRALGOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT NO . 1 , NEW DELHI , KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX DELHI 7. Here in this case it is not a matter of dispute that the workmen, who were paid from contingencies , were performingwhole timejob with the management since the dates mentioned in para 1 of this award. Their services wereregularized on the dates mentioned in para 1 of this award. They performed functions analogous to regular

1.D. No. 16/2007 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7861

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14, 1931

...Workman

Sh . Mahavir Singh and five others , through All India CPWD (MRM) Karamchari Sangathan , House No. 4823 , Gali No. 13 , Balbir Nagar Extension , Shahdara, New Delhi - 110032

Versus

1. The Superintending Engineer , Coord.Circle(Elect .), CPWD, East Block, R.K. Puram , NewDelhi .

2. The Executive Engineer, ' A' Division , CPWD , Estate Block , I.P. Bhawan , NewDelhi .

...Management

AWARD

2.Claim statement was filed on behalf of the workmen , pleading therein that they were employed as daily rated workmenw.e.f. the dates as mentioned in para 1 above . It wasprojected that their services were regularized w.e.f. the dates mentioned in para I above. They rendered 240 days continuous service with the management from the date of their employment till the date of their regularization . There are three wings under CPWD viz . Electrical , Civil and Horticulture , where several daily rated workmen are employed bythe management. The Apex Court in Surender Singh ' s case [ 1986 ( 1 ) SCC 639 ] gave a command to the management to regularize services of its daily rated workmen, from the date of their initial employment , who have put in six months of contiuous service . Accordingly Director General ( Works ) CPWD issued order dated 25-8-88 for regularization of muster roll employees . Horticulture wing of the management regularized service of its daily rated workmen by 7-12-88 , while Electrical and Civil wings did not take any action in this behalf . The workmen is covered under the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 ( in short the Act ) and orders were issued in that regard by the management on 26-6-2006 . Ram Khilari , a similarly situated workmen , raised an industrial dispute and Industrial Tribunal , Govemment of. NCT, Delhi gave an award for regularization ofhis services from the date ofhis initail employment . Workmen are eligible for regularization of services from the date of their initail employment . It has been claimed that the management may be commanded to regularize their services from the date of their initail employment .

Shri Mahavir Singh S/ o Shri Phool Singh joined services with CPWD as Carpenter w.e.f. 1-1-79 . He rendered continuous service of 240 days and his services were regularized as Carpenter w.e.f. 31-3-86, Shri Jeet Singh S/o Sh. Pumma Singh joined services with CPWD as Plumber w.e.f. 5-6-79 and after rendering continuous service of240 days his services were regularized w.e.f. 15-11-84. Shri Rajvir Singh S/ o Shri Sita Ram joined services with CPWD as Carpenter w.e.f 4-1-83 and after rendering services of 240 days he was regularized as Carpenter w.e.f. 20-11-92, Shri Sohan Lal S/ o Shri Heera Lal joined services with CPWD as Mason w.e.f. 20-9-81 and after rendering 240 days and his services were regularized in the post of Mason w.e.f. 26-2-86 , Shri Surender Singh S/o Shri Ram Kishan joined services with CPWD as Plumber w.e.f. 15-1-83 and after rendering 240 days continuous service he was regularized as Plumber w.e.f. 18-12-92 and Shri Chander Bhan S/ o Shri Kishan Lal joined services with CPWD as Carpenter w.e.f. 12-10-82 and after rendering 240 days continuous service he was regularized as Carpenter w.e.f. 1-12-92 . They claimed regularization of their services from the date of their initial employment. When their demand was not accepted by the management , they raised an industrial disputebefore the Conciliation Officer. Since conciliation proceedings came to an end , the appropriate Government referredthe dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , vide order No. L-42012/28/2006- IR ( DU) New Delhi , dated 19-2-2007 with following terms:

"Whether the demand ofAll India CPWD ( M.R.M) Karamchari Sangathan for regularization of services of S/ Shri Mahavir Singh , Jeet Singh , Rajvir Singh , Sohan Lal, Surender Singh and Chander Bhan , from the date of their initial employment on muster roll, is legal and justified ? If yes, to what relief the workmen concerned are entitled to and from which date ? "

3. Contest was given to the claim statement pleading therein that the workmen were working on muster roll with the management and their services were regularized from the date mentioned by them in Annexure I to the claim statement . Their contention that they are eligible for regularization of their services from the date of their initial ; engagement , is false . The Apex Court in Surinder Singh's case (Supra) never directed the management to regularizc services of muster roll employees from the date of their initial employment . In compliance of the order handed down by the Apex Court , 8982 posts were created in September , 92 , and thereafter all workers were regularized in services from prospective dates and not from the date of their initial engagement in various precedents Apex Court ruled that employees selected on daily wages nowhere automatically become regular from the date of their initial employment, even if they perform duties similar to the regular emplyees . The workmen cannot claim regularization from the back date . When vacancies were available for them their services were regularized . It has been projected that their claim for regularization from the date oftheir initial employment is false.

7862

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

(a) Service paid from contingencies should have been , in ajob involving whole time employment ( and not part-time for a portion of the day) .

(b) Service paid from contingencies should be in a type of work or job for which regular posts could have beensanctioned , e.g. malis , Chowkidars , Khalasis , etc. 4. During the course , of adjudication , Shri Satish Kumar Sharma , General Secretary , of All India CPWD (M.R.M. ) Karamchari Sangathan , who was authorized represntative of the workmen, made a statement on their behalf that the workmen does not press his claim for regularization in the services from the date their initial employment . Consequently , it is evident that the workmen gave up the contest of their demand for regularization of their services from the date of his initial employment .

(c) The service should have been one for which the payment is made either on monthly or daily rates computed and paid on a monthly basis and which though not analogous to the regular scale of pay should bear some, relation in the matter of pay to those being paid for similar jobsbeing performed by staffs in regular establishments .

(d) The service paid from contingencies should have been continuous and followedby absorption in regular employment without a break .

(e) Subject to the above conditions being fulfilled the weightage for past service paid from contingencies will be limited to the period after 1st January , 1961 for which authentic records of service may be available . Reference can be made to office memorandum No. G. I.M.F. , O.M. No. 12( 1 )-EV/ 68 , dated the 14th May , 1968 .

5. Circular No. 29 /77 /2000 - ECX, New Delhi, dated 26-6-2006 was issued by the Director General ( Works) CPWD, in respect of payment of Gratuity to its casual, hand receipt and muster roll workers under the Act . The said circular makes it clear that the metter was examined in consultation with the Ministry of Urban Development and Ministry of Labour and it was clarified that the Act is applicable to casual , Muster roll , hand receipt and daily rated workers ofthe CPWD . Consequently all ADV's , CS, SCS , SC, Coordination , Executive Engineer, Directorate of Horticulture , Additional Directorate ofHorticulture , Deputy Directof Horticulture , All Deputy Welfare Labour Commissioners and Assistant Labour Welfare Commissoners were requested to make payment of Gratuity to casual muster roll , hand receipt and daily rated workers of CPWD as admissible under the Act . It was further mentioned therein that current/pending court cases on the similar issue may be defended or got settle accordingly. Therefore , it is evident that the management admits the claim ofall casual muster roll , hand receipt or daily rated workers of the CPWD for payment of gratuity under the Act.

7. Here in this case it is not a matter of dispute that the workmen, who were paid from contingencies , were performingwhole time job with the management since the datesmentioned in para I of this award . Their services were regularized on the dates mentioned in para 1 of this award . They performed functions analogous to regular employees till the date of their regularization . Their services with the management were continuous without any break . They satisfied all the conditions laid down in the aforesaid office memorandum issued by the Govt . of India . Hence , the management is under an obligation to comply the said office memorandum and count service of the workmen for the purpose of pension .

8. In view of the fact that contest was given up by the workmen for regularisation of their services from the date of initial employment and the management is under an obligation to comply the aforesaid circular and the Rules , it is expedient to command the management to record services rendered by Workmen as muster roll employee in their service book , which services would be taken into account for payment of gratuity under the Act , at the time oftheir superannuation or death , as the contingency arise as well as for calculation of qualifying service for pension under the Pension Rules , 1972. An award is accordingly passed. It may be sent to the appropriate Government for publication.

DR . R.K. YADAV, Presiding Officer

Dated: 30-10-09

6. Whether service rendered by the workman , which was paid from contingency , can be counted towards pension ? For an answer, provisions of CCS Pension Rules 1972 ( in short the Rules ) are to be considered . Rule 14 ofthe said Rules makes service paid from contingencies do not count as qualifying service for pension . However Government of India took a decision in May, 1968 and an office memorandum was issued on 14-5-1968 , wherein it is detailed that in some cases , employees paid from contingencies , employed in types of work requiring services of whole-time workers and are paid on monthly rates of pay or daily rates computed and paid on monthly basis and on being found fit brought on to regular establishment . The question whether in such cases service paid from contingencies should be allowed to count for pension and if so to what extent has been considered in the National Council and in pursuance of the recommendation of the Council , it has been decided that halfthe service paid from contingencies will be allowed to count toward pension at the time of absorption in regular employment subject to the following conditions , viz .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 11 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3307.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. -1 , दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 52/2004 ) दिनांक 16-10-09 को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/ 135/2004- आई आर ( बी.- II ) ]

7863

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14, 1931

New Delhi , dated 7th of October , 2004 , with following terms :-

"Whether the action of the management of Syndicate Bank in terminating the services of Shri Rajinder Prasad S/o Shri Changa Ram , temporary sub - staff w.e.f. 11-9-2001 is just and legal ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled to ?"

यू. एस. पाण्डेय , अनुभाग अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 11th November, 2009 S.O. 3307.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 52/ 2004) dt . 16-10-99 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- 1 , Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Syndicate Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 10-11-2009.

[No. L- 12012/ 135/2004- IR (B - 11 ) ] U. S. PANDEY, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV , PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT NO . 1 , NEW DELHI , KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI

I. D. No. 52/2004

Dateof Order: 16-10-09

Workman Shri Rajinder Prasad S/ o Shri Changa Ram, Ward No. 8 , Mohalla Bhagwala, Town -Bawal , Rewari.

Versus

TheAsstt . General Manager , Syndicate Bank Sarojni House , 6 -Bhagwan Das Road, New Delhi - 110001 .

Management

AWARD

1. A casual employee , working in the Bawal Branch of Syndicate Bank, was not continued in service after 11.9.2001 . He had joined that branch on 19th of January , 2001. When his services were discontinued, he raised a demand for reinstatement before the Conciliation Officer . Since conciliation proceedings failed , the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide order No. L- 12012 / 135 / 2004 - IR ( B - II), 2. Claim statement was filed by Shri Rajinder Prasad pleading therein that he worked as a temporary sub- staff in the Bawal branch of the bank at two spells . Initially he workedfrom 30-12-1994 to 1-11-1999 . His services were discontinued at that juncture . He was subsequently engaged on 19-1-09 and worked with the bank till 11th of September , 2001. He projects that in November , 1999 there was one attender posted at the aforesaid branch of the bank, against a sanctioned strength of two attenders . Though there was a vacancy available , yet his services were terminated, with an object to deprive him to secure status and privilege of a permanent employee. Action of themanagement was violative of the provisions of section 25-T of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (in short the Act) . He was again engaged on 19th of January, 2001.11e . worked there till 11.9.2001 . His services were terminated on 11.9.2001 , under the guise of transfer of a permanent attender to that branch . He sent a representation dated 12.9.2001 , to the Chairman of the bank but to no avail . No notice or pay in lieu thereof was given to him . He was not paid any retrenchment compensation. His termination amounts to retrenchment , as defind by section 2 (oo) of theAct . His retrenchment is violative of the provisions of section 25 F of the Act . He claims reinstatement in services with continuity and full back wages .

3. Contest was given to the claim pleading that Rajinder Prasad was engaged as a casual labour for supply of portable water. He was neither appointed against a regular post nor in consonance with rules and procedurc for appointment of a regular employee . His services were engaged an account of exigency of work . He never rendered continuous service . Hence , he was not entitled to the benefit under the Act .

The management is supposed to follow the procedure for recruitment for filling a regular vacancy . Rajinder Prasad was not taken in services by following that procedure . A panel of Attenders is prepared by the Zonal Office of the bank. Name of Rajinder Prasad does not appear in that panel . He was engaged as a casual employee , as and when there was exigency of work . He was paid coolie charges for supply of water . There was no relationship of employer and employec between the parties . There is no question of violation of the provisions ofsection 25 - F of the Act . His claim is liable to be dismissed .

4. Rajinder Prasad has examined himself in support ofhis claim. Shri Surinder Pal , Manager , was examined by 7864

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ] the management to substantiate their stands . No other witness was examined by either of the parties .

5. Arguments were heard at the bar . Shri C.D.Chaturvedi , authorized representative , advanced arguments on behalf of the workman . Shri Rajesh Mahendru , authorized representative , raised his submissions on behalf of the management. I have given my careful consideration to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record . My findings on issues involved in the controversy are as follows .

of two period viz; ( i) uninterrupted service , and ( ii ) interrupted service on account of ( a) sickness , (b) authorized leave, (c) an accident, ( d) a strike which is not legal , ( e) a lock- out and (f) a cessation of work that is not due to any fault on the part of the workman , shall be included in the " continuous service . " Sub-section (2) of the said Section introduces a fiction to the effect that even if a workman is not in " continuous service " within the meaning of clause ( 1 ) for a period of one year or six months , he shall be deemed to be in continuous service for that period under an employer ifhe has actually worked for the days specified in clauses ( a) and (b) thereof.

6. Rajinder Prasad testified that he joined services in Bawal branch of Syndicate bank - as a casual labour in December , 1994. He served the bank till September , 1999. His duties were to fetch water , clean bank premises and dust official files . His duty hours were from 8 A.M. till 9P.M. He was paid @ Rs.20/- perday .He was not paid for Sundays and Holidays . Oneday in the month of September, 1999 , the Branch Manager told him that since a communication has been received from Zonal Office , hence his services were no longer required. He made him to leave the job saying that he was unable to engage him any further.

10. In Vijay Kumar Majoo ( 1968 Lab . I. C. 1180 ) it was held that one year's period contemplated by sub- section (2) furnished a unit of measure and if during that unitof measure the period of service actually rendered by the workman is 240 days , then he can be considered to have rendered one year's continuous service for the purpose of the section . The idea is that if within a unit period of one year a person had put in at least 240 days of service, then he must get the benefit conferred by the Act . Consequently, an enquiry has to be made to find out whether the workman has actually worked for not less than 240 days during a period of 12 calendar months , immediately preceding the retrenchment.

7. Rajinder Prasad led emphasis that he again joined services of the bank as a daily wager on 19-1-2001 . He used to perform all duties of a casual labour . He used to go to Rewari for cash remittance purposes . He was not paid for Sundays and holidays . He was paid@ Rs . 80 per day. He worked with the management upto of 12th of September , 2001. He had not rendered continuous services for 240 days . He had rendered only 236 days continuous service with the management at that spell . His week for a work were not paid . No notice was served upon him when his services are terminated . No compensation was paid to himat that time . During the course of his cross - examination he concedes that he was taken in employment of the bank without any examination or interview . He was not registered with Employment Exchange. Hence there was no question of his name being referred to the bank for employment . He pleaded that it was function of the Zonal Office of the bank to recruit sub staff for any branch of the bank . He was not employed in Bawal Branch of the bank by its Zonal Office .

11. As testified by Rajinder Prasad he was employed by the bank for the second spell on 19-1-2001 as daily wager . He worked with the bank till 12-9-2001 . He admits that he had not rendered 240 days continuous service at that time . He rendered only 236 days continuous service with the management at that spell . Whether his services rendered till September , 1999 can be counted for reckoning continuous services for a period of one year ? For an answer this Tribunal has to take into account the deeming provisions of continuous service laid in sub section (2 ) of Section 25 - B of the Act . For that purpose , the Tribunal had to take into account the date on which the services of theworkman was dispensed with and from that date it had to proceedback for calculation of 240 days of continuous services . If in that process calculation is made then it only comes to 237 days of continuous services and not of 240 days of continuous services . The first spell of services rendered by workman cannot come to his rescue , since the actual date of termination of service is in September , 2001 and from that date he had only rendered 237 days of continuous services . Consequently , it is evident that Rajinder Prasad had not rendered continuous service for a period of one year , as defined in sub - section ( 2 ) of Section 25 B of the Act .

8. Shri Sunder Pal unfolds that Shri Rajinder Prasad was performing his duty as water boy in Bawal Branch of the bank . His functions were to fill water in cooler and serve water to the staff. No other duties were assigned to him. He was a casual employee , who used to report at 9 AM and leave at about 1 PM. There was no relationship ofemployer and employee between Shri Rajinder Prasad and the bank .

9. " Continuous Service" has been defined by Section 25B of the Act . Under sub- section ( 1 ) of the said section " continuous service for a period" may comprise

12. Services of the workman were retrenched without payment of notice pay , and retrenchment compensation. It is well settled that in a case of wrongful retrenchment , dismissal or discharge , the normal rule is to award reinstatement . But where a case falls in any of the exception to general rule , the industrial adjudicator has discretion to award reasonable and adequate [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

compensation, in lieu of re - instatement. Section II-A of the Act vests the industrial adjudicator with discretionary jurisdiction to give " such other relief to the workman " in lieu ofdischarge or dismissal as the circumstances ofthe case may require, where for some valid reasons it considers that reinstatement with or without conditions will not be fair or proper .

13. Since the workman had not rendered continuous service for a period of one ear, he is not entitled for one month notice or pay in lieu thereof for retrenchment of his services . Retrenchment compensation has not accrued to him in terms of the provisions of Section 25 -F of the Act, since he had not rendered continuous service for a year . Therefore , his retrenchment is not violative of the provisions of Section 25 - F , 25 - G and 25 - H of the Act .

14. Since Rajinder Prasad was not appointed in the services ofthe bank in compliance of the normal procedure ofrecruitment and he has not rendered continuous service of one year , the action of dispensing with his services by the management was just and in accordance with law . Hisservices were engaged on exigency of work and when the work came to an end management was justified in dispensing with his services. He is not entitled to any relief of reinstatement in the services . An award is accordingly passed.

Date: 16-10-2009

DR . R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 13 नवम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 3308.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मै. खरगा कैण्टीन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 134/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -14012/66/2002- आई. आर. ( डी.यू. ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th November, 2009 S.O. 3308.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 134/ 2002) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, No. - 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Kharga Canteen and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-11-2009 .

7865

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/ अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA , PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT- 1 ,

CHANDIGARH

Case No. I. D. No. 134/2003

Shri Sher Singh (Retd .) Subedar (Clerk) AnandNagar -A, Near Baba Balak Nath Mandir , Babyal Ambala Cantt . (Haryana)

Versus

TheCanteenOfficer , M/ s . Kharga Canteen ( I & II) , Babyal Road, Ambala Cantt. Through Gen-Officer Commanding, HQ 2 Corps , 56 A.P.Ο.

APPEARANCES

For the workman

: Sh. Balbir Singh

Sh . A. K. Verma

For the management :

AWARD

Passed on 3-11-2009

Government of India , Ministry of Labour , vide notification No. L- 14012 /66/2002-1R(DU) dated 20th June , 2003, by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the act ) , referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

"Whether the action of the management of M/s . Kharga Canteen(I and II ) Babyal Road , Ambala Cantt. in terminating the services of Sh . Sher Singh Ex- Account Manager without complying with the provisions of Section 25 - F, 25 -G & 25 - H is just and legal? If not so , what reliefthe workman is entitled to and from which date? "

2. Learned legal representative of workman appeared and made the following statement :

"The management has raised objection regarding the jurisdiction of this labour court to adjudicate the casesofdefence canteen employees ' in the referencc case of Anita Vs. Golden Lion Canteen on the basis ofthejudgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supremc Court. I have gone through the judgment and the objection is correct and the canteen employees have not been held to be Central Govt . Employees . Thus this court has no jurisdiction . Therefore , I may be allowed to withdraw the present reference and to file the same before the appropriate authority without any impedimnet of limitation. "

3. In view of the above statement of the representative of the workman , the present reference is returned to the Central Govt . as withdrawn with a right to raise the issue before the appropriate authority without any impediment of limitation. Central Govt . be imformed . Filebe consigned.

Chandigarh

3-11-2009

[No. L- 14012/66/2002- IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer 4233 G1/09-25

G.. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer 7866

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009 /AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

नई दिल्ली, 13 नवम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 3309.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं.- I , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 131/02 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो कंन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-11-09 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/38/2002- आई आर( डीयू) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th November, 2009

[ PART II -SEC . 3( ii) | "Whether the action of the management General Manager , Telecom , Amritsar in terminating the services of Sh . Sahib Singh S/ o Sh . Joginder Singh , workman w.e.f. 28-2-99 is just and legal ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ?"

2. Case repeatedly called . None appeared on behalf of the workman. It appears that workman is not interested to pursue his case . In view of the above as the workman is not appearing to pursue his case, the present reference is returned to the Central Govt . for want of prosecution . Central Govt , be informed . File be consigned .

Chandigarh .

Dated 28-10-2009

Camp at Amritsar

S. O. 3309.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 131/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum - Labour Court , No. 1 Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of D/o . Telecom and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 13-11-2009.

[No. L-40012/38/2002 - IR (DU ) ]

SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT- I , CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D. 131 of 2002

Sh . Sahib Singh C/ o Sh . N.K. Jeet, 27340 , Lal Singh Dici Road, Mohalla Hari Nagar , Bhatinda (Punjab )

Vs.

The General Manager, Telecom . , Deptt . of Telecom , Amritsar ( Punjab )

APPEARANCES

: None

For the Workman

: None

For the Management

AWARD

Passed on 28-10-2009

Government of India , Ministry of Labour , vide notification No. L- 40012/38/2002 /IR( DU ) dated 24th July 2002, by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) , referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal .

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 13 नवम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 3310.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार गोल्डन लॉयन पीएच एण्ड एचपी ( आई ) , अम्बाला कैंट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नं. - 1, चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 51/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-11-09 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -14012/41/2002- आई आर ( डीयू) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th November , 2009 S. O. 3310.- in pursuance of Section 17 of the industriai Disputes Aci , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.51 /2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court No. - I , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Golden Lion PH & HP ( 1 ) , Ambala Cantt . and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 13-11-2009 .

[No. L - 14012/41 /2002 - IR ( DU ) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRALGOVT. INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT - I , CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D. 51 of 2003

Sh. Sat Pal S /o Sh . Beli Raın, Village Bichli Dhamouli , Tehsil Naraingarh , Ambala (Haryana) 7867

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

Versus

The Chairman , Canteen Managing Committee, Golden Lion PH & HP ( I ) , Sub Area Canteen Cell Ambala Cantt . (Haryana)-133001 .

APPEARANCE

For the Workman

: Sh . Balbir Singh

: Sh . A. K. Verma

For the Management

AWARD

Passed on 3-11-2009

Government of India, Ministry of Labour , ide notification No. L- 14012/41 /2002- IR ( DU) dated 2nd January 2003 , by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to asthe Act) , referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to his Tribunal :

"Whether the action of the management of Golden Lion PH & HP ( I) Ambala Cantt . In terminating the service of Sh . Sat Pal , Ex- Salesman is just and legal ? Ifnot so, what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ? "

2.Learned legal representative of workman appeared and made the following statement :

"The management has raised objection regarding the jurisdiction of this labour court to adjudicate the cases of defence canteen employees ' in the reference case of Anita Vs. Golden Lion canteen on the basis of the judgement rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court . I have gone through the judgement and the objection is correct and the canteen employees have not been held to be Central Government Employees . Thus this court has no jurisdiction . Therefore , I may be allowed to withdraw the present reference and to file the same before the appropriate authority without any impediment of limitation . " 3. In view of the above statement of the rep . of the workman, the present reference is returned to the Central Government as withdrawn with a right to raise the issue before the appropriate authority without any impediment of limitation . Central Government be informed . File be consigned .

Chandigarh 3-11-09

G.K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 13 नवम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 3311.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बी. पी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , इर्नाकुलम के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 26/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-11-09 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-30011 / 12/2009 - आई आर( एम)]

कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी;

New Delhi , the 13th November , 2009 S. O. 3311. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Centrál Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.26/2009) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court, Ernakulam now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BPCL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 13-11-2009 .

[No. L- 30011 / 12/2009-1R ( M ) ]

KAMAL BAKHRU, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM Present: Shri P. L. Norbert, B.A. ,LL.B. , Presiding Officer (Monday the 19th day ofOctober , 2009/27th Asvina, 1931 )

I.D. 26/2009

Union

:TheGeneral Secretary, Refinery Employees Union , BPCL, Kochi Refinery , Ambalamughal (Kerala)-682302 Management : The Executive Director , BPCL, Kochi Refinery, Ambalamughal (Kerala)

This case coming up for hearing on 19-10-2009, this Tribunal-cum- Labour Court on the same day passed the following:

AWARD

This is a reference under Section 10 ( 1 )(d) of Industrial Disputes Act challenging the termination of service of workman Sri T.P. Saju of BPCL . , Kochi Refinery , Ambalamughal .

2. On summons management alone entered appearance . Though the Union Secretary accepted summons nobody has turred up to represent the union . The case was posted again for the appearance of union . Butthere is no response . Hence it has to be presumea that there is no existing dispute for adjudication .

7868

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5, 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

V/ s

Their Workmen

The Vice President ,

In the result an award is passed finding that the action of the management in terminating the service of Sri T.P. Saju is legal andjustified and he is not entitled for anyrelief.

Nhava Sheva Port and General Workers Union , PortTrust Karmgar Sadan , Nawah Tank Rd . ,

The award will come into force one month after its publication in the Official Gazette .

Nazgaon, Mumbai -400010 .

... Second Party

APPEARANCE

Dictated to the Personal Assistant , transcribed and typed by her, corrected and passed by me on this the 19th dayofOctober,2009 .

FortheEmployer : Mr. R.S. Pai , Advocate P.L. NORBERT, Presiding Officer

Forthe Workmen : Mr. Jaiprakash Sawant, Advocate

Appendix-Nil .

Date of reserving the Award: 7-5-2009

नई दिल्ली , 13 नवम्बर , 2009

Date ofpassing the Award : 10-9-2009

AWARD PART II

Thematrix ofthe facts as culled out from the proceedings are as under:

का. आ. 3312.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार न्वाहा सेवा इन्टरनेशनल कनटेनर टर्मिनल लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 2/59/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को13-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-31011/5/2002- आई आर ( एम) ]

कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी

2. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L- 31011 /5/2002 - IR( M) dated 16th July, 2002 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

New Delhi , the 13th November , 2009

"Whether the action of the management ofNhava Sheva International , Container Terminal Ltd. in terminating the services of Shri Sameer Pandit, ex-OC Operator w.e.f. 16-8-2001 is legal and justified ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled?

S. O. 3312.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/59/2002 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court No. - 2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofNhava Sheva International Container Terminal Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-11-2009.

[No. L- 31011 /5/2002 - IR (M) ]

KAMAL BAKHRU, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI

Present : A: A. Lad: Presiding Officer..

Reference No. CGIT-2/59 of 2002

Employers in Relation to the Management of Nhava Sheva International Container Terminal Ltd.

The ChiefExecutive Officer,

Nhava Sheva Ineternational Container

Terminal Ltd. , Operation Centre,

Sheva, Navi Mumbai -400 707

First Party

2. To support the subject matter involved in the reference 2nd Party filed Statement of Claim at exhibit 5 stating and contending that, the action of the Management indismissing the concerned workman from services with effect from 16th August , 2001 by its order dated 16-1-2001 is illegal and unjustified . It is stated that, the action of the Management is against the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and it amounts to unfair labour practice within the meaning of Item 5 (a) (b )( d) (f) and ( g ) of Vthe Schedule of induastial Disputes Act, 1947. It is stated that , the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 were not followed while instituting and conducting the enquiry . Even provisions of Industrial Employment ( Standing Orders) Act, 1946 were not followed by framing charge and investing the charges levelled against the concerned Workman . Besides it is stated that , the finding of the Enquiry Officer is perverse and punishment awarded is disproportionate . So it is prayed that , the enquiry conducted be set aside observing not fair and proper 7869 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

besides finding perverse . It is also prayed that , the action against the concerned Workman for such an enquiry be quashed and set aside .

workman guilty of the willful insubordination or willful disobedience , riotous , disorderly behaviour , inciting, abetting or instigating others to stop work and refused to accept the suspension order as well as did not behave properly at work place were proved and copy of the said was forwarded to the concerned workman on which she was asked to submit her remarks . After receiving the remarks from the concerned workman , Disciplinary Authority took decision of his dismissal . Said was challenged by the concerned workman before Appellate Authority . Even Appellate Authority did not find any substance in say of the concerned workman and confirmed the finding on which the Disciplinary Authority decided to take action of termination .

3. These contentions are disputed by the 1st Party by filling Writen Statement at Exhibit and stating that, full copportunity was given to the concerned Workman . It is stated that, the representative of the 2nd Party who is also an Advocate participated in the enquiry. Witnesses were examined and the witnesses examined by the Management were made available in the enquiry to the Defence Representative . Full opportunity was given to the concerned Workman . Documents were given . Enquiry Officer had given reason and observe the charges are proved against the concerned Workman . It is stated that, enquiry was fair, proper and finding not perverse . It is also stated that , the punishment awarded to the concerned Workman does not require to be disturbed . So it is prayed that, the Reference be rejected.

6. On the point whether the action taken by the Ist Party is justified or no evidence is led by both sides . They straightaway submitted written arguments i.e. by 2nd Party atExhibit 28 and 1st Party at Exhibit 30 with citations .

4. In view ofthe above pleadings my Ld . Predecessor framed Issues at Exhibit 7 out ofwhich Issues No.1 and 2 were decided by passing Part I Award on 13th August, 2007 holding enquiry fair and proper and finding not perverse . Now, issue of quantum of punishment is taken for consideration which I answer as follows :

Issues

Findings

7. Perused those on the charges leveled against the concerned workman as well as the finding given by the Enquiry Officer . It is to be noted that , while passing Part 1 Award on 13th July, 2007 enquiry is observed fair and proper . It was also observed finding not perverse . When enquiry was observed as fair and proper and finding not perverse in that case, action taken by the 1st Party of dismissal required to be considered very cautiously.

Yes

3. Whether the action of the Management of Nhava Sheva International Container Ltd. in terminating the services of Shri Sameer Pandit , ex .QC Operator w.e.f. 16-8-2001 is legal and justified ?

4. What relief the workman is entitled to?

Does not servive .

Reasons :

Issue Nos . 3 & 4 :

8.Here the Ld Advocate for the 1st Party referred to number of citations more precisely ( 1 ) citation published in 2006 (2 ) SCC page 269in the case of L.K. Verma vs. HMT Ltd. , (2) citation published in 2005 ( 3 ) SCC page 134 in the case ofMahindra & Mahindra Ltd. vs. N.B. Narawade , ( 3 ) citationpublished in 1995 II CLR page 569 ( Karnataka High Court) in the case of Dr. Padmnabhudu vs. Bank of India and anr . , (4) citation published in 2005 ( 2 ) SCC page 48 | in the case of BHEL vs. Chandrashekhar Reddy, ( 5 ) citation published in 2006 ( 111 ) FLR page 1187 ( SC ) in the casc of TELCO vs. N.K. Singh , ( 6 ) citation published in 2008 (2 ) LLJ page 309 (SC) in the case of TELC vs. Workman , ( 7 ) citation published in 2005 ( 105 ) FLR page 155 in the case of M.P. Electrcity Board vs. Jagdish , (8 ) citation published in 1980 ( 1 ) LLJ page 295 in the case of Sarabhai M. Chemicals vs. M.S. Almere , (9 ) citation published in 1975 ( 1 ) LLJ page 3911 in the case of Mulchandani Electrical & Radio Industries Ltd. vs. Their Workman, ( 10 ) citation published in 2007 ( 1 ) Mah . L.J. page 2497 in the case of S Khan vs. Hashmat & Co. , ( 11 ) citation published in 2008 (2 ) LLJ SC page 945 in the case of Usha Breco Mazdoor Sangh vs Management of Usha Breco Lrd . and anr. , ( 12 ) citation published in 2007 ( 1 ) CLR page 563 in the case of Golden Chemicals Ltd. vs. Mohd. Azam Dil , where in all cases it was observed that, when misconduct is proved in that 5. Charge of willful insubordination, riotous or disorderly behaviour during working hours , inciting other workers , refused to work, refused to accept the suspension order and sexual harassment to women employees at work place were leveled against the concerned workman by issuing charge sheet . Opportunity was given to the concerned workman to participate in the enquiry. After receiving the explanation from the concerned workman which ist Party found unsatisfactory, decided to proceed against the concerned workman by appointing Enquiry Officer . Enquiry Officer conducted enquiry and after recording evidence Enquiry Officer found concerned 7870

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] case, punishment given need not be disturbed and require to reconsider very cautiously if it is challenged by the concerned workman. Here charge of misconduct was leveled against the concerned workman and it was proved against the concerned workman . The charge of instigating workers or colleagues not to attend work, charge of not obeying officers, charge of not attending work, charge of behaving in disorderly manner at work place and charge of insulting women workmen working at work place were leveled against the concerned workman.

12. Here charges are of very serious nature . Instigating other workers or colleagues not to attend work , charge of misconduct is leveled which is of very serious nature . If we looked into the scenario where such workers are attending work generally others are following such type of element and if said is not considered very cautiously and seriously definitely; it will spread among others and definitely will come in the way of the Management which will create problems on the production as well as on the industrial peace.

13. Ifwe consider all this , coupled with the case made out by both and the ratio laid down by various Courts referred by 1st Party's Advocate , I conclude that, the punishment of dismissal in such a scenario is just and proper and does not require to interfere . So I answer the above issue to that effect and passes the following order :

ORDER

Reference is rejected with no order as to its costs .

9. The concerned workman tried to submit in the arguments that , those charges cannot be leveled against the concerned workman since it was not permissible to Ist Party. Besides it is stated that, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not permit the management to level such charges allegations and there is no right to the Management to prosecute the concerned workman on these charges . However, it is not pointed out as to how the Management cannot level such charges against the concerned workman and it is not shown how charges are not legal and proper or how it is beyond the jurisdiction ofthe employer?

Bombay

10thSeptember , 2009

A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 13 नवम्बर, 2009

10.No doubt Enquiry Officer is silent about sexual harassment to women workmen at work place but evidence brought on record before the Enquiry Officer reveals that , concerned workman was torturing the lady workers , talking irrelevantly with them , insulting them and this Court observed finding given by the Enquiry Officer is just and proper and has base to decide like that.

का. आ. 3313. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भीलाई स्टील प्लान्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण श्रम न्यायालय जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/एलसी/आर/ 147/02 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-11-09 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-29011 /37/2002- आई आर ( एम) ]

कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th November , 2009

S. O. 3313.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. CGIT / LC/ R/ 147/02) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Bhilai Steel Plant and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 13-11-2009.

11. When such charges are leveled and when said charges are against the interest of the employer to maintain the industrial peace in the organization which is expected at work place , in my considered view, employee of this typeifkept in the employment will definitely disturbs others and will lead them to behave like that and will encourage them not to attend work and said will spread wrong signal and will create unrest at the work place . Here charge of instigating workers or colleagues not to attend work was leveled against the concerned workman which is of very serious nature . Besides Enquiry Officer observed that , said charges are proved against the concerned workman . Even charge of behaving disorderly at work place was leveled against the concerned workman which was also observed as proved by the Enquiry Officer against the concerned workman. When that is the position and when number of eitations are produced by the Ist Party's Advocate are showing that , when such misconduct is proved, it is not desirable for the Labour Court or the Court sitting under Section II -A ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to interfere in the order of the punishment .

[No. L-29011 /37/2002-1R ( M) ] KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/ 147/02

Presiding Officer : Shri Mohd . Shakir Hasan The President,

Metal Mines Workers Union , Rajhara Branch , Daili -Rajhara,

7871

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

Workman/Union

Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh .

Versus

The General Manager ( Mines ) ,

Bhilai Steel Plant ,

Bhilai (Chhattisgarh)

Bhilai (M.P)

of the school show that he was Brahmin . It is stated that the workman committed misconduct under the clause 29 ( ii ) and ( iii ) of the Mines Standing Orders . It is denied that the charges are fabricated and are only for victimization to the workman. A departmental enquiry was held after giving opportunity to defend himself or through co - worker . The workman participated in the enquiry. After enquiry the charges were found proved . The Disciplinary Authority found that the workman obtained the employment of the postof schedule Tribe on the basis of faise certificate of the Caste "Gond " . Under the circumstances , the workman is not entitled to any relief.

Management

AWARD

Passed on this 20th day of October, 2009 1. TheGovernment of India , Ministry ofLabour vide its Notification No.L-29011 /37/2002 - IR(M) dated 17-10-02 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

"Whether the action of managment of Bhilai Steel Plantin removing services of Shri Joginder Thakur , Attendant , P/No . 899269 of Rajhara Mechanised Mines ofBSP vide order No. OMQ/Raj /Estt.III/99 / 594 dated 12-4-99 is legal and justified ? If not , to whatrelief the workman is entitled ?"

2. The case of the workman in short is that the management served on him a chargesheet alleging therein that he had committed a major misconduct under clause 29(ii) and ( iii) of Mines Standing Orders . It is alleged that the allegation of charges were fabricated with an aim to victimize the workman . It is stated that the declaration of caste is not amount to any misconduct under Mines Standing Orders. It is stated that valid caste certificate was issued by the State official which was found valid and genuine by the Employment Exchange officials . On these grounds, it is submitted that the reference be answered in hisfavour.

3. The management also appeared and filed the Written Statement . The case of the management , interalia , is that the workman was served with a charge sheet on 16-4-97 for the acts of misconducts . The charges against the workman were that he had committed fraud in connection with the company's business and had given false information regarding one's name and caste at the time of employment . He had applied as Schedule Tribe candidate and a false caste Certificate of the Caste " Gond " was filed by him to secure appointment though he was by caste " Brahmin " . The School records and transfer certificate 4. During the course of proceeding , the workman filed an application dated 14-10-09 to withdraw the case . It issubmitted that he doesnot want to proceed with the case and no dispute award be passed . The management has also no objection , if no dispute award is to be passed . Since the workman doesnot want to pursue the case , it appears to be no justification to keep the reference pending . In view of his prayer, the reference is answered .

5. In the result, no dispute award is passed without any costs.

6. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment asper rules .

MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 13 नवम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 3314.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एयरपोर्ट ऑथोरिटी ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , इर्नाकुलम के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 148/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं. एल -11012/23/2004- आई आर( एम) ] कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th November , 2009 S. O. 3314. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 148/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court, Ernakulam now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Airport Authority of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-11-2009 .

[No. L- 11012/23 /2004 - IR ( M) | KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer 7872

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

ANNEXURE

(1 ) M/s. Puliyadiyil Services , Vanchiyoor, Trivandrum ,

(2) M/s . Sreeranga Electrical , MGR Nagar , Madras , IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM

Shri . P.L. Norbert , B.A. , LL.B. , Presiding Officer

Present :

(Fridaythe 25th day of September, 2009/ 3rd Asvina, 1931)

I.D.148/2006

Workman :

(3 ) M/s . R.K. Electricals , Medical College P.O. , Trivandrum , (4) M/s .Utility Engineer ( 1) Ltd. , (5 ) Shri Shabu V.S. , Trivandrum ( 6 ) M/ s . Utility Airconditioning Service , Bangalore and ( 7 ) M/s. Freezton Air Condition Engineers , Magadi Road, Bangalore for appointing him in the services of M/s . Airport Authority of India , Trivandrum Airport , is justified ? If so , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled ? "

Sh.Sunil Kumar A. , TC 41/876 , Kuryanthi , T.N.Puram Manacaud , Trivandrum .

By Adv . Shri . T. C. Krishna

Management : I. M/s . Puliyadyil Service Centre , Ambujavilasom Road, Near GPO, Trivandrum -695 001.

2. The Airport Director ,

Trivandrum Airport Authority ofIndia (NAD) , Trivandrum International Airport , Trivandrum -695 008 .

By Adv . K.L. Narasimhan

2. The facts of the case in brief are as follows : ----The worker Shri Sunil Kumar claims that he was employed in Trivandrum Airport as A/c Operator from 1991 onwards . According to him though the operation and maintenance work of Air Conditioners were entrusted by the management to different contractors the workers continued to be the same since 1991. However the workman was denied employment from 30-6-2001 on the ground that the agreements with the contractors had been terminated. The contract was only a camouflage . The work done by the workman was prohibited under Contract Labour ( Regulation and Abolition) Act , 1970. Hence the workman is entitled to betreated as employee of Airport Authority of India and absorbed in service .

3. M/s . Utility Engineer (India) Ltd. , J.C.Nagar , Bangalore.

4. M/ s . Ranga Electricals , Electrical Engineers , 8 , Kamaraj Street, MGR Nagar , Chennai - 600078.

5. M/ s.R.K. Electrical , Medical College , 'Trivandrum.

6. M/ s . Utility Air- conditioning Services, 4, R.K.Block, J.C.Nagar , Bangalore - 560 023 .

7. M/s.Freezetone Airconditioning Engineers , No.59 , IInd Floor , 9thCross Main Mangadi Road, Bangalore - 560 023 .

3.According to the management the reference is not maintainable as this court has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute. The contract employment in the work of electrical installation , Air - Condition Operation etc. is not prohibited under CLRA Act so far . The workman was never employed in Trivandrum Airport either directly or indirectly bythe Airport Authority . Airport Authority of India in the past had entrusted operation and maintenance of different electrical installations to various contractors . It is denied thatthe same workers continued under different contractors from 1991 onwards . The engagement of contract labour is within the control and management of contractors and management has nothing to do with it . Aiport Authority has not terminated the service of the workman. Such matters are to be decided by the contractors themselves . The contract is genuine . Since the worker has never been in the employment ofthe management there is no question ofthe workman . The claim of the workman is unsustainable .

8. Sh . Shabu V.S. , Syam Niwas , Kamaleswaram , Manacaud , Trivandrum - 695 009.

4. In the light ofthe above contentions the following points arise for consideration :

This case coming up for hearing on 22-09-2009, this Tribunal - cum- Labour Court on 25-09-2009 passed the following.

1. Whether the contract is genuine ?

AWARD

2. Is the workman entitled for regularisation ?

This is a reference made under Section 10( 1 ) ( d) of Industrial Disputes Act . The reference is :

"Whether the demand of Shri Sunil Kumar , ex - AC Operator who claims to have worked with

5. The evidence consists of the oral testimony of WWI and documentary evidence of Exts . Wl to 10 on the side of the workman and MWI and Exts . Ml to M3 on the side of the management .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

6. Point Nos . 1 & 2 : Shri Sunil Kumar had worked in the Trivandrum Airport as an Air- condition Operator . According to him though he was initially engaged through a contractor, it was only a sham arrangement in order to deprive the benefits of a regular employee . On the other hand the management contends that the worker was never engaged by the Airport Authority but by the contractors .

7. Ext . W1 is the Gazette notification of 16-11-1999 under Section 10 ( 1 ) of CLRA Act prohibiting contract labour in the Electrical Wing of Air Port Authority. Item No. 3( i) of the schedule reads:

"Day to day maintenance and operation of air conditioning plants , generator sets and electrical installations except where these are being undertaken by the manufacturer/ original supplier as part of the supply arrangements . This will not apply to periodical maintenance such as annual overhaul of equipment orheavy breakdowns requiring replacements ofmajor components etc. which the establishment may have entered into with equipment supplier or supplier's nominee" .

Thus the contentions of the Airport Authority of India that contract labour in the field of Air- condition operation and maintenance is not prohibited under CLRA Actisbereft of truth . The prohibition was there since 1999 as per Ext . W 1. Though the workman contends that he was controlled and supervised by officers of Airport Authority and treated as an employee of the Airport Authority, other than his own testimony there is no corroborative evidence . The workman ( WW1 ) adrnits that he was working under contractors and wages were paid by the contractor and receipt was issued by him to the contractor . There are no records to prove he was supervised and controlled by Air Port Authority . There is equally no evidence as to who is the Disciplinary Authority . The records available go to show that he had been working under different contractors in Trivandrum Air Port in A/ C operation and maintenance section ofplants from 1991 to June 2001. Exts . M1 to M3 are contract agreements of the period 1997-1998 , 1998-99 and 1999-2001 . The contract given was operation and comprehensive maintenance of air- conditioning plants . Though seven contractors are parties to the dispute none have appeared or filed written statement . Exts . W4 to 6 series are temporary passes issued to the workman by Airport Authority during the period from 10-06-1991 to 03-05-2001 . They can only show that the workman was engaged in the Airport for some work , but not necessarily as an employee of the Airport . Exts. W7 , 8 , 9 and 10 are certificates issued to the worker by different contractors during different periods from 1991 to '98 stating that the workman was employed as an Air - Condition Plant Operator under the contractors and he was attending to operation 1333G1/09---26

7873

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

and maintenance of Central Air- Condition plant at the InternationalAirport Authority of India, Trivandrum . Ext . W2 is a reply of Airport Authority to the workman dated 24-10-2002 stating that his representation for appointment and regularisation under Airport Authority cannot be considered favourably since he was engaged only by the contractors . Ext . W3 is comments of Airport Authority submitted to Assistant Labour Commissioner ( Central ) in respect of industrial dispute raised by the workman . It is stated in Ext. W3 that as per the records available the workman and another person had worked under a contractor from 01.09-1999 to 31-07-2001 and the contract was terminated w.e.f. 01-08-2001 . Thus Exts . MI to M3 , W3 and entry passes Exts .W4 to 6 series go to show that the workman was Engaged in Trivandrum Airport in Air- condition Plant for operation and maintenance . There is no doubt that he was engaged initially by a contractor in 1991 . Heworked under different contractors as contract labour until 1999 and the contract was genuine till then .

8. But on 16-11-1999 a notification prohibiting employment of contract labour for maintenance and operation ofAir- condition plants was, issued and published in the Gazette . However the Airport Authority continucd to employ the workman till the end of June 2001. It is observed in Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. National Union Waterfront Workers (2001 ) 7 SCC 1 , para 68 as follows :---

"68. We have extracted above Section 10 of the CLRA Actwhich empowers the appropriate Governmentto prohibit employment of contract labour in any process , operation or other work in any establishment, lays down the procedure and specifies the relevant factors which shall be taken into consideration for issuing notification under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 10. It is a common ground that the consequence of prohibition notification under Section 10( 1 ) of the CLRA Act , prohibiting employment of contract labour , is neither spelt out in Section 10 nor indicated anywhere in the Act . In our view , the following consequences follow on issuing a notification under Section 10 ( 1 ) of the CLRA Act :

(1) contract labour working in the establishınent concerned at the time of issue of notification will cease to function;

(2) the contract of principal employer with the contractor in regard to the contract labour comes to an end;

(3) no contract labour can be employed by the principal employer in any process , operation or other work in the establishment to which the notification relates at any time thereafter ;

(4) the contract labour is not rendered unemployed as is generally assumed but [PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] 7874

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: DECEMBER 5 , 2009 /AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

continues in the employment of the contractor as the notification does not sever the relationship of master and servant between the contractor and the contract labour ;

unjustified and it is not in accordance with the provisions of ID Act and he is entitled to be reinstated with back wages and other benefits . However the demand of the workman for regularisation is a matter for the Airport Authority to consider in accordance with the recruitment norms .

The award will come into force one month after its publication in the official gazette .

(5) the contractor can utilise the services of the contract labour in any other establishment in respect ofwhich no notification under Section 10( 1 ) has been issued where all the benefits under the CLRA Act which were being enjoyed by it, will be available ;

Dictated to the Personal Assistant, transcribed and typed by her, corrected and passed by me on this the 25th day of September , 2009 .

P. L. NORBERT, Presiding Officer (6) if a contractor intends to retrench his contract labour , he can do so only in conformity with the provisions of the ID Act .

Appendix

Witness for the Workman

WWI 12-02-2009 A. Sunil Kumar

Witness for the Management - Nil .

The point now under consideration is whether automatic absorption of contract labour working in an establishment , is implied in Section 10 of the CLRA Act and follows as a consequence on issuance of the prohibition notification thereunder . We shall revert to this aspect shortly" .

MWI 26-06-2009 Royi .R.

Exhibits for the Workman

WI Gazette.notification dated 16-11-1999 issued by Ministry of Labour , Government of India .

W2 Letter dated 24-10-2002 issued by Airport Authority of India to the workman .

W3 Photocopy of comments issued by Airport Authority of India.

W4 Passes issued by Airport Authority of India (2Nos .).

W5 Temporary pass issued by Bureau of Civil Aviation Society .

W6 Photocopy of daily permits issued by Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (5 Nos . ) .

W7 Certificate dated 22-11-1991 issued by Sri. Ranga Electricals .

W8 Certificate issued by Freezone Air - conditioning Engineers.

W9 Certificate dated 23-7-1998 issuedby Utility Air-conditioning Services .

W10 Photocopy of certificate dated 10-05-1996 issued by Utility Engineers ( India ) Limited.

Exhibit for the Management

9. As observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court once the employment of contract labour in any field is prohibited the contract comes to an end and the service of contract labour to comes to an end . But if the principal employer continues to engage contract labour it cannot be considered as an employment under contractor . If the principal employer claims that the continued engagement of labour is on the strength of a contract, it cannot be a genuine contract either . The labour engaged after prohibition notification can only be the employees of the principal employer . The very fact that the Airport Authority continued to engage Shri Sunil Kumar as revealed from the documents referred supra , means that the workman is an employee is an employee of the Airport Authority. His service after date of prohibition notification can be dispensed with by the Airport Authority only in accordance with the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act . It is for the Airport Authority to consider his regularisation in service in accordance with the eligibility criteria . The Airport Authority cannot be heard to say that the service of the workman was not terminated by the Airport Authority but by the contractor . Since the worker was an employee ofthe Airport Authority till 2001 the termination of service can be donc only by the Airport Authority and not by the contractor. Since the Airport Authority had not followed the procedure for termination of service , the workman is entitled to be reinstated with back wages and other benefits . However the question of absorption is a matter for the Airport Authority to consider in accordance with recruitment norms .

M1 Original of the agreement No. 15 / EE ( E ) AMED / TVM/ 97-98 dated 29-05-1997 entered into between Ist respondent and Contractor , M/ s . Utility Air- conditioning Services , No. 4 , R. K. In the result an award is passed finding that the termination of service of the workman is illegal and 7875 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2, MUMBAI .

Block, J. C. Nagar , Bangalore -560 006 for operation and comprehensive maintenance of 2x60 TR Central Air Conditioning Plant and its connected equipmentsduring the year 1997-1998 .

PRESENT : Shri A. A. Lad , Presiding Officer

Reference No. CGIT -2/25 of 2007

Employers in Relation to the Management of Airport Authority of India

TheAirport Director ,

Airport Authority of India ( IAD) Mumbai Airport , Mumbai 400 099 .

AND

M2 Original ofthe agreement No./7'EE ( E ) AMED/ TVM/98-99. dated 01-09-1998 entered into between this respondent and Contractor , M/s. Utility Air-Conditioning Services , No. 4, R. K. Block , J. C. Nagar , Bangalore -560 006, Bangalore for operation and comprehensive maintenance of 2x60 TR Central Air- Conditioning Plants and its connected equipments during the year 1998-1999 and ;

Their Workmen

The President , AirportKamgar Union , CPWDOffice Compound, Bamanwada, Mumbai 400 059 .

APPEARANCES

FortheEmployer

: Ms. Savita Shetye , Representative.

For the Workmen

M3 Original ofthe agreement No. 10/EE ( E D TVM/99-2000 dated 01-12-1999 ent.tmto between this respondent and Contractor , M/s. Freezone Air- Conditioning Engineers , No. 59 , lInd Floor , Ninth Cross , Main Mangadi Road, Bangalore- 560 023 for operation and comprehensive maintenance of 2 × 60 TR (Utility make) Central Air -Conditioning Plants with its connected equipments during the year 1999-2000.

: No appearance .

Mumbai , dated 5th October , 2009.

नई दिल्ली , 13 नवम्बर , 2009

AWARD

का. आ. 3315.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एयरपोर्ट ऑथोरिटी ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी-2/25/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

I. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour,by its Order No.L - 11011 / 52/ 2004 - IR( M) , dated 09.02-2007 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d ) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 ( A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-

[ सं. एल -11011/52/2004- आई आर ( एम ) ]

कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th November , 2009

" Whether the industrial dispute raised by the Airports Kamgar Union against the management of Airport Authority of India for permanent absorption of Shri Edwin Tawares and 4 other workmen ( List attached) justified? If so, what reliefthe workmen are entitled to? "

Listof workers as per annexure ' A' :

1 . Shri M.Y.Shaikh

2. Shri R. B. Kadam

3. Shri Ramdas Mohite

4. Shri Ganesh More

S. O. 3315. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Govemment hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. CGIT 2/ 25/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , No. 2 , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the Employers in relation to the management of Airport Authority of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 13-1-2009 .

5. Shri Edwin Tawares

[No. L- 11011 /52/2004 - IR (M) ]

KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer

2. After receipt of reference , notices were sent to union which was served to union vide Ex - 4 and again vide 7876

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

Ex- 10 . No body appeared on behalf of the union to file claim statement . Number of opportunity was given to union. Hence the order:

ORDER

Reference is disposed of for want of prosecution .

Date: 05-10-2009

A. A. LAD, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 13 नवम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 3316.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एयरपोर्ट ऑथोरिटी ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 25/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -11011/18/2004- आई आर ( एम) ] कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th November , 2009 S. O. 3316.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.25 /2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , No. 1 , New Delhi , now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the Employers in relation to the management of Airport Authority of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-11-2009 .

[No. L- 11011 / 18 /2004 - IR ( M) ] KAMAL BAKHRU, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT NO. I , NEW DELHI, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI

I. D. No. 25/2004

Indira Gandhi Airport T.D.I. Karamchari Union Through its General Secretary, Dichau Kalan , House No. 717,

Najafgarh, New Delhi - 110043

Workman

Versus

1. Airport Authority of India, Through its Chief Executive Officer , IGI Airport. New Delhi - 110017.

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) | 2. International Airport Authority ofIndia, Through its Chief Executive Officer, 1.G.I.Airport , New Delhi - 110017 . Principal Employer

Contractor 3. M/s T.D.1 . International India Pvt . Ltd. , Through its General Manager , B-4/62, Safdarjung Enclave, NewDelhi .

4.General Manager (Commercial ) Airport Authority of India , ( I.A.D. ) , I.G.I. Airport Terminal - 1 .

New Delhi - 110037.

Principal Employer 5.General Manager ( Personnel ) , Airport Authority of India . ( I.A.D. ) I.G.I. Airport Terminal - 1

New Delhi- 110037.

Principal Employer 6. Sindhu Holdings Limited, Rakesh Malik ( C.E.O ) , Through Additional General Manager , Shanker Basu I.G.I. Airport

Terminal - 1 . New Delhi .

New Contractor

AWARD

The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L- 11011 / 18 /2004 IR( M) dated 22-4-04 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication:

"Whether the damand of the Union of Indira Gandhi Airport TDI Karamchari Union , Dichau Kalan , 717 , Najafgarh , New Delhi against the management of Airport Authority of India , IGI Airport , New Delhi i.e. , Addl . General Manger ( Commercial ) , General Manager ( Personnel ) and Airport Director for regularization of 171 workers ( List enclosed) engaged in the work of Trolley Retrievers from 1993 at domestic and International Airport, which is a continuous and perennial nature of work and not to give further employment by M/s . Sindhu Holding Ltd. , G-65, Bali Nagar , New Delhi 15, isjust . Valid and legal? If so, to what benefits the workmen are entitled for and what directions are necessary in the matter? " 2.Workmen plead in their claim statement that they are in employment of the Airport Authority of India since 1993.According to them , the trolly workers of Domestic and International Airport of Delhi are workmen of the Principal Employer and to be absorbed as regular employees with retrospective effect . The managment had not given any provident fund , overtime or other statutory benefits to them to evade benefits of their past service , fresh appointment letters were issued to them in 1996. The system oftrolly retrieving began in 1984 and it continued without break till date . In pursuance of order dated 5-11-2003 passed 7877

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

byHigh Court of Delhi in WP( C) 5248 of2002 the Airport Authority of India and the new Contractor are bound to givethem preference over new and fresh workmen in fresh contract . However they were ignored.

not exist valid certificate and licenses for the entire period ofemployment of contract workers . The so called contract between the Principal Employer and contractors is a sham and bogus one .

3. The work done by the trolley retrievers is the collection and distribution of trolleys at the airports . They are required to collect trolleys both at domestic and international airports , parking spaces and the roads . They are required then to push and distribute those trollies at the different part of the airport for use by the passengers . They work for minimum of 8 hours a day . They are often required to work two shifts in the day . They work continuously throughout the year . They do not get a single day leave with wages . Theydo not get overtime wages whenthey work extra shift . They get no bonus or gratuity . In fact they are not given statutory benefits .

6. Work of trolley retrieving is of statutory nature . The notification governing the functions of the Airport Authorities are set out in the Airport Authority of India Act, 1994 (in short the Act ). Section 12 (3 ) ( m ) of the Act lays down that it is the function ofthe Authority to " provide such transport facility as are ; in the opinion of the authority necessary to the passengers travelling by air . " The contract dated 9-3-89 in respect oftrolley retrievers shows pervasive supervision and control or the airport authorities . Clause5 provided that the wages paid would be the minimum wage . Clause 12 provided that the contract would be terminated if the contract workers form a union . Contract dated 15-2-96 shows pervasive supervision and control by the airport authorities . The number of trolleys and workers required is pre -determined obviously on the basis of the member of flights .

7. The Central Government by its order declined to abolish employment of contract labour in trolleys retrieval system and provided for wages which were to be paid at parwith permanent workers . It has been decided by the Central Government not to prohibit the employment of contract labour in the job of trolley retrieval . AAI provided that the wages (consisting of Basic + DA ) paid to low category of employees in the respective establishment are paid to the contract labour .

4. Flight schedules show work throughout the day and night . The flights arrive and depart throughout three shifts. Further, flights are delayed and pressure of delayed flights are felt and experienced by trolley workers of the next shift too . After the last flight , trolley workers collect all trolleys from all points where it were taken and then trolleys are counted and checked for any defects and damage, for it to be repaired at the workshop . On counting, invariably everyday there is a shortage of 40-50 trolleys at each of the airports and thereafter the workers have to start search operation at the airport premises . Further search is conducted at about 3 a.m. which is even done in agricultural fields , villages, runways and at cargo section. The search so conducted goes on for couple of hours and covers a wide area . By the time the search is furnished and trolleys are tallied , thereafter defective and damaged ones are sorted out to be moved to trolleys maintenance workshop.

8. The BombayHigh Court in the writ petition No. 2994 of1999 has made a consent order dated 4-4-2003 directing a reference in identical circumstances in respect of trolley workers ofBombay . Bombay trolley workers are , therefore , protected. The management have a practice of requiring the subsequent alleged contractor to absorb the alleged contract worker of the departing contractor . Workmen project that they have been stopped from joining regular duties by the respondents from the midnight of 5 / 6th December , 2003. On enquiry they were informed that new contractor , namely, Sindhu Holdings Pvt. Ltd. was allotted contract ofretrieval of trolleys at the airport . The workmen met the Airport Manager , of Sindhu Holdings and requested him to absorb them in their employment . Their request was declined , which persuaded them to raise the dispute.

9. Management contests the claim , pleading that Airport Authority of India is a statutory body established under the Act , for the purposes of maintenance and development of Airports and during discharge of its 5. The workmen are employees of the International Airport Authority of India ( in short A.A.I. ) Leave is sought to refer to and rely on Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 19266 of2001 in respect ofBombay trolley retrievers wherein certain documents are produced by the union of the Bombay trolley retrievers showing that the work is of continuous and perennial nature , With a view to create a camouflage between the Airport Authorities and the workers , the Airport Authorities have introduced a contractor as a paper intermediary and wrongly treated the workers as the employees of the contractor . Authorities sent a letter dated 21-4-93 to the contractor disclaiming any liability in respect of statutory benefits to the workers . The contract was entered into to contract out of the labour law, which is unconscionable and void, being hit by Section 23 of the Contract Act . The workmen present that the registration certificate of the principal employer reveals that there did 7878

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii )]

trolley retrieval in the establishment of AAI on contract basis . Further on 16-11-99 the Govemment of India issued a circular stating that the said prohibition under Contract Labour ( Regulation and Abolition ) Act , 1970 will not be applicable to certain contract works at the Airport Authority of India , Air India and Indian Airlines .

12. Similar issues are pending before the llon'ble Supreme Court of India wherein the defendant challenges variousjudgement and orders passed by the Hon'ble High Court in various trolley retrieval matters i.e. Civil Appeal No. 9669 of2003. AAI Vs. Airport Authority Kamgar Union andOrs . , in which the Hon'ble Supreme Court was pleased to grant leave and also granted interim relief by order dated 8-12-2003 . Since similar issues are pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court had already granted stay in the Civil Appeal No. 9669 of 2003 , hence till the final disposal of the said matter, the proceedings pending before this Tribunal be adjourned sine die, otherwise it would lead tojudicial predicament. In view of the above there is no case for any relief to the claimants against the management.

activities the management avails services of various contractors. In this regard the management has awarded the work ofairport trolley retrieval of M /s Sindhu Holding who is to decide the requirement of the manpower at a given time , depending upon the requirement of trolly retrieval work . M/s Sindhu Holding in 1996 entered into an agreement with the respondent No. 3 M / s TDI International Ltd. M/s TDI engaged services of the claimants and appointment of the claimants was Co-terminus with the agreement executed between the AAl and M/ s . TDI . The contract between AAI and M /s TDI came to an end in the midnight of 5-12-2003 and as per the appointment letter issued by M / s TDI , the claimant's contract of employment withM/s TDI also came to an end . Management projected that claimants were never employees of AAl . In fact they were the employees of M/ s TDI . The matter of appointment, service condition and terminations of the workmen it was controlled and supervised by M/ s . TDI Respondent No. 3 , who was their employer for all purposes and intents . No employer /employee relation over existed between Airport Authority of India and claimants . Now M/s. Sindhu Holding has deputed its manager and supervisor to carry out supervision and control over their employees . The salary was paid to the claimants by M/ s TDI only . Attendance was marked by M/s . TDI only. The statutory deduction and deposit of PF and ESI under the provisions of respective Acts are deposited by M/ s TDI only .

13. During the course of adjudication , application wasmoved on behalf of the workman pleading therein that they are agitating their grievance before the Division Bench ofHigh Court of Delhi in LPA No. 38/2007 and under those circumstances they want to withdraw the reference . The said application was declined , since the workrien were not competent to withdraw the reference sent to this Tribunal by the appropriate Government for adjudication . It was announced that under the law a party is not competent to withdraw the reference . The Tribunal is under a bounden duty to answer the reference made to it , by the appropriate Government . Such order was passed by the Tribunal on 11-5-09.

10.Management claims that AAI follows a detailed system ofappointment and recruitment of its employees . It isprojected that workmen , who have raised the present dispute, have already been gainfully employed . They may be directed to furnish details of their employment . Management agitates that the claimants are seeking regularization oftheir services with the management , who were never their employer . They have no right to seek regularization or any other relief against the management . Their claim for regularization is entirely misconceived and liable to be rejected.

14. Workmen raised the issue before the High Court ,during the course of hearing of L.P.A. No. 38/2007 The High Court was of the view that the dispute was to be closed down during the , pendency of the proceedings before it . Accordingly High Court ordered that reference 1.D. No. 35/2004 stands closed , vide its order dated 13.7-09 .

15. In view ofthe order passed by the High Court of Delhi , it is not competent for this Tribunal to proceed further with the adjudication on the reference . Consequently the Tribunal refrains its hands from adjudication of the dispute . The dispute referred to the Tribunal by the appropriate Government is answered accordingly . In view of the order ofthe Hon'ble High Court , it is concluded that the dispute stands closed . An award is accordingly, passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication .

Date: 2-9-2009

11. On 4-3-99 the respondent and the union representing the workmen were heard by the Central Advisory Contract Labour Board with regard to the issue whether contract labour in trolley retrieval should be abolished or not . On 20-7-99 , the Central Advisory Contract Labour Board, vide its notification No.U - 23013/3 /92(Vol.II ) decided not to recommend abolition of contract labour system with respect to trolley retrieval in the establishment referred above . On 16-11-99 the Ministry of Labour examined the recommendations of the Board in various jobs in the establishment of Air India , Indian Airlines and AAI in detail and rightly decided, not to prohibit work of

DR . R. K. YADAV , Presiding Officer 7879

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 13 नवम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 3317,-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सी. पी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 8/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-30011/67/2006- आई आर ( एम) ] कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th November, 2009 S. O. 3317.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 8/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court , Chennai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of CPCL and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 13-11-2009.

[No. L-30011 /67/2006-1R (M ) ] KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Wednesday, the 28th October , 2009 Present : A.N. JANARDANAN , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 8/2008

[ In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 ( A) of Section 10 ofthe Indiustrial Disputes Act , 1947( 14 of 1947 ), between the Management of BPCL amended as CPCL vide Corrigendum dated 4-3-2008 and their Workmen ]

BETWEEN

...Petitioner/ 1st Party The General Secretary,

Chennai Petroleum Corporation Employees Union , 7, Sairam Avenue , Ist Street Behind Jai Garden , Valsaravakkanı , Chennai - 600 087

Vs.

...Respondent/ 2nd Party The Director ( Operations) , Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , Manali

APPEARANCE

: M/s Ajay Khose For the 1st Party/ Petitioner

: M/s . S. Ramasubramanian & Associates .

For the 2nd Party/ Management

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L - 30011 / 67/2006 - IR( M ) dated 6-2-2008 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-

The Schedule mentioned in that order is:

"Whether the demand of the Chennai Petroleum Corporation Employees Union for extending check- offfacility to their Union is just and legal ? Whether the existing system of check - off adopted by the Management of CPCL is in violation of entry 3 of 5th Schedule of the ID Act, 1947 ? Ifso , to what relief the aforesaid Union is entitled to ? " 2. After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 8/2008 and issued notices to both sides . Both sides entered appearance through their respective counsel .

3. Points for determination are :

(i) Whether the demand of the Chennai Petroleum Corporation Employees Union for extending check-off facility to their Union is just and legal?

(ii) Whether the existing system of check- off adopted by the Management of CPCL is in violation of Entry- 3 of 5th Schedule of the IDAct?

Point Nos . 1 and 2

5. The matter while stood continuously posted for filing Claim Statement , it was reported on behalf of the Petitioner Union that the General Secretary of the said Union is no more . Though the ID stood again reposted for further steps owing to the eventuality of the death of the General Secretary of the Union , petitioner's counsel filed a memo reporting that the ID is not pressed . The memo is recorded . Accordingly the ID is closed as being not prosecuted .

6. The reference is disposed of as above .

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 28th October, 2009 ) .

A. N. JANARDANAN , Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined : -.-

For the I Party/Petitioner : Nonc

For the 11 Party/Management : None 7880

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

[ PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Documents Marked :-

Shri Vilas Janrao Ingale,

From the Petitioner's side :

Date

Ex. No.

Description

...Second Party

Mumbai Labour Camp , Bldg. No. 1 ( 1960 ) Room No.4, Dr. Ambedkar Marg , Matunga, Mumbai -400019

Nil .

APPEARANCE

From the Management side:

: Shri M.B.Anchan ; Advocate

FortheEmployer

Ex. No.

Date Description

For the Workmen

Nil.

: Mr. Abhay Kulkarni and Mrs. Pooja Kulkarni , Advocates .

नई दिल्ली, 13 नवम्बर , 2009

Date ofreserving the Award : 2-6-2009 .

Date of passing the Award: 16-9-2009.

AWARD - PART I

The matrix of the facts as culled out from the proceedings are as under :

का. आ. 3318. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मुम्बई पोर्ट ट्रस्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. - 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी -2/28 / 2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-31012/16/2001- आई आर ( एम) ]

कमल बाखरू, डेस्क अधिकारी

1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour by its Order No.L - 31012 /16/2001 - IR( M) dated 5th March , 2002 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d ) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the followi ng dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

New Delhi , the 13th November , 2009

"Whether the action of the management ofMumbai Port Trust in terminating the services of Sh . Vilas Janrao Ingale , Ex - Security Guard w.e.f.7-2-1998 by way of dismissal is legal and justified? If not , what relief he is entitled to ? "

S. O. 3318.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/28/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. 2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Mumbai Port Trust and theirworkman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-11-2009 .

[No. L - 31012/16 /2001-1R ( M ) ] KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer

2. Claim Statement is filed by the concerned Workman at Exhibit 7 making out the case that , he joined IstParty as a Security Guard with effect from 14-10-1982 . He states that , he was kept under suspension with effect from 9-10-1992 on the ground of disciplinary proceedings werecontemplated , as per order dated 9-10-1992 . He further states that , said order of suspension was revoked on 8-2-1994.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2 , MUMBAI

Present : A.A. LAD, Presiding Officer

Reference No. CGIT - 2/28 of 2002

Employers in relation to the Management of Mumbai

PortTrust

The Chairman,

Mumbai Port Trust ,

Shoorji Vallabhdas Road ,

Ballard Estate ,

Mumbai-400 038

...FirstParty

V/ s .

Their Workman

3. He states that , charge sheet dated 30-7-1994 alleging charge of committing theft of car which fall under Regulation 3 ( 1 ) of Bombay Port Trust Employees (Conduct) Regulation , 1976 for not maintaining absolute integrity and devotion to duty and under Regulation 3 ( 7) ibid were levelled against the concerned Workman . Even Police case filed against him . Since Police case was proceeded against him he requested Management not to proceed against him in the departmental enquiry. However, it was not heard by the Management and it proceeded against the concerned Workman along with the criminal case . He states that , said decision taken by the Management to proceed with the departmental enquiry since criminal case was pending against him was not just and proper and could not go on unless he was prosecuted . He states that , departmental enquiry was conducted by the Management against him without following due process of law and as per natural justice . He alleges that , i [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

7881 even finding given by the Enquiry Officer is perverse . He states that Disciplinary Authority merely concurred with finding of the Enquiry Officer and gave show cause notice dated 5-3-1997 calling upon him to show cause as to why penalty ofdismissal should not be imposed upon him. He states that by reply dated 19-4-1997 he requested Management that , the penalty of termination cannot be imposed upon him . However Disciplinary Authority vide orderdated 7-2-1998 imposed the punishment of dismissal upon him. It is stated that , the 2nd Party preferred an appeal on the said order . However, it was not allowed by the Appellate Authority. He states that, even he filed revision petition which was also not considered .

4. 2nd Party further contents that, by his represen- tation dated 21-2-2000 he raised the industrial dispute and challenged the termination order served upon him with a request for reinstatement . According to him , Enquiry Officerwasbias . He states that, enquiry conducted against him was not conducted by following the principles of natural justice . He states that , the finding given by the Enquiry Officer is perverse . He alleges that , action taken ofdismissal is not just and proper and require to interfere with the order of reinstatement with benefit ofback wages and continuity of service .

No. 8738 of Canara Bank and Cheque Book No. 18511 in possession of the concerned Workman . It is stated that , the statement of the concerned Workman was recorded on 3-10-1992 where concerned workman admitted theft of the said car with the help of Shri Kolare , a theift operating inthedocks . It is further stated that , a case was registered under C.R. No. 1064/92 u/ section 379 and 114 of IPC . It is statedthat, both were arrested by Police and were produced before 30th Metropolitan Magistrate's Court , Kurla. It is stated that, the said Kurla Court released them on bail . It is stated that, as such they were in Police custody for 5 days and as per the rules he was suspended from his duty w.e.f. 9-10-1992. It is stated that , subsequently his suspension was revoked on administrative rights to initiate Departmental Enquiry and accordingly he was prosecuted by the Management by conducting departmental enquiry alleging charges of misconduct by committing theft of private car and violating provisions of Regulation 3 ( 1 ) and 3 ( 7 ) of Mumbai Port Trust Employees ( Conduct) Regulations , 1976 were levelled against the concerned Workman. The concerned workman tiled explanationto the charge sheet and denied the charges alleged against him and the departmental enquiry was conducted in 32 days . It is stated' that, out of them on 16 occasions the concerned workman remained absent and for 22days his defence representative was absent . It is stated that, allthe witnesses in the case were examined and cross -examined . It is stated that , full opportunity was given to the concerned workman to participate in the enquiry. It is stated that , after recording evidence Enquiry Officer concluded concerned workman guilty of the charges levelled against him . By order dated 20-1-1997 said finding was accepted by the Disciplinary Authority and accordingly a memo was served on the concerned Workman to show cause why penalty of dismissal should not be imposed upon him.

5. This is disputed by the 1st Party by filing Written Statement at Exhibit 8 stating and contending that, the concerned Workman was working as Security Guard as Security Guard No. 744 in security organization ofMb.P.T. It is stated that, on 1-10-1992 he was posted for duty at Gate No.3 , Port Trust Hospital , Wadalla in second shift which starts from 16.00 hrs to 24.00 hrs . It is stated that, Mr. M.J. Bhoir, Assistant Commissioner of Police , who was on night round with 2 constables on 2-10-1992 detained concerned Workman with his accomplices Shri Prakash Narayan Kolare sitting inside Ambassador CarMMB 1457 near Yellow Gate Princess Dock at Mallet Bunder Container Road . It is stated that, on questioning them by the Police they learnt that ; car in their possession was stolen one . It is stated that , as a result of that , the concerned workman was booked by the Yellow Gate Police Station. It is stated that, on enquiry Police came to know that, the car was stolen one and complaint was lodged by Shri Anish Jitendra Shah with the Matunga Police Station on 2-10-1992 for theft of the said car possessed by the concerned workman for which complained was lodged for the theft ofhis said car . It is alleged that, said car the was parked by the owner by the side of the foot path opposite VJIT Hostel at Lady Jehangir Road , Matunga, Mumbai- 400 019. It is that , he sent Duty Officer Shri P.I. Kasope PSI to hand over 2nd Party along with the car for further investigation to Matunga Police Station where Shri S.P. Kuber , API and Detection Officer made Panchnama of the said car . It is further alleged that, when concemed workman was personally searched in the presence of Panchas by Matunga Police , they found registration Book of Car No. MMB 1457 , one master key, a Savings Bank Pass Book

6. It was replied by the concerned workman alleging that , he was arrested by Police on mere suspicion and nothing was found on him . It is stated that, the concerned workman did not involved in the said theft. It is stated that, the Disciplinary Authority after considering his reply to show cause notice decided to terminate the services of theconcerned workman , According to 1st Party concerned Workman was defended by his Defence Representative , full opportunity was given to him . It is stated that , after recording evidence and after giving him full opportunity the Enquiry Officer concluded that, the charges levelled against the concerned workman were proved . It is denied that, enquiry was not fair and proper. It is denied that , the finding was not perverse. It is denied that, the Enquiry Officer was bias . It is denied that , the concerned workman cannot be prosecuted by the Disciplinary Authoritywhen criminal case is pending. So it is prayed that, the decision taken by the 1st Party relying on the finding given by Enquiry Officer does not require to interfere and prayer of reinstatement require to rejected .

423395/ 09-27 7882

[PART 11 SEC . 3 ( ii )| THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

7. In view of the above pleadings my Predecessor framed Issues at Exhibit 10. Out of them Issue No. 1 and 2 on fairness of enquiry and perversity of finding are taken as preliminary issues which I answer as follows :

Issues

Findings

1. Whether the domestic inquiry conducted against the workman was as per the principles of natural justice ? Yes 2. Whether the findings of the Enquiry Officer are perverse? No REASONS:

Issues Nos . 1 & 2 :

8. In this case the concerned Workman was prosecuted by the Police under charge of stolen car . Even domestic enquiry was conducted by leveling charge of possessing stolen car. He was suspended on his arrest and then suspension was revoked . Thereafter charge sheet was served upon him , explanation was sought and his said explanation when found not satisfactory , he was prosecuted by holding departmental enquiry where evidencewas recorded and finding was given . Said enquiry and finding is challenged by the concerned workman saying that , enquiry was not fair and proper and finding perverse.

9. To show that, 2nd Party placed reliance on his affidavit filed at Exhibit 18 , in lieu ofhis examination - in- chief, where he narrates facts as stated above and states that, enquiry was not fair and proper and finding perverse . However, in cross he admits that, he was served with the charge sheet anddocuments . He admits that, he replied the charge sheet. He admits that , he was defended by his Advocate Shri Sawant . He admits that, enquiry was completed on 22-8-1996 which was started on 7-11-1994 . He admits that , he was served with the show cause notice . He admits that , he was served with dismissal order dated 7-2-1998 . He admits that, fair opportunity was given to him to participate in the domestic enquiry . On that Management filed affidavit of its witness Prakashlal Tripathi , in lieu of his examination- in- chiefat Exhibit 19 , who states that , the concerned workman was appointed asSecurity Guard with Mumbai Port Trust. He states that, the concerned workman was posted at Gate No. 3 Port Trust Hospital , Wadala on 1-10-1992 . He further states that, the Assistant Commissioner of Police Shri M.J. Bhoir who was on night round with 2 constables on 2-10-1992 arrested the concerned workman with his accomplice Shri Kolhare who was sitting in the Ambassador Car No. MMB 1457 near Yellow Gate . He further states that, these 2 were taken by Yellow Gate Police and enquired with them and on that, they learnt that car was stolen and complaint was lodged by Anish Jitendra Shah with Matunga Police Station on 2-10-1992 . He further states that , duty officer Shri Kasabee , PSI was sent to hand over them and the car to Matunga Police Station who investigated into it and prosecuted the concerned workman under IPC leveling charge of theft and possessing stolen car leveling charge under Sections 379 and 114 of 1. P. C. He further states that, charge sheet was served on the concerned workman and departmental proceeding was initiated against him . He further states that , full opportunity was given to the concerned workman . He participated in the enquiry with hisDefence Representative . According to him enquiry was fair and proper and finding not perverse . In the cross he states that, enquiry was not conducted in English though it was written in English . He states that , he did not know whether the . concerned workman was acquitted by the Criminal Court . He states that , he was neither present in the enquiry nor he was witness in the enquiry . He admits that, he has no personal knowledge about the finding given by the Enquiry Officer . On that Management closed its evidence by filing closing purshis at Exhibit 20 .

10. Written arguments were submitted by the concerned workman at Exhibit 21 with citations filed at Exhibit 22which were replied by the 1st Party by filing its written arguments at Exhibit 23. Perused the same and the evidence .

11. Here the concerned workman challenges the enquiry saying that , principles of natural justice were not followedwhile conducting enquiry and there was no evidence before the Enquiry Officer to conclude concerned workman guilty of the charges levelled against him. It is an admitted fact that , the concerned workman was acquitted by the Criminal Court . However , it does not mean that, he could not be prosecuted under departmental enquiry as happened in the instant case.

12. Here Enquiry Officer placed reliance on the Police report and the investigation done by the Police . It isbrought on record that , the concerned workman was arrested by the Police . In search Police recovered R.C. Book, Pass Book of Bank , Cheque Book and some other material which are related with the vehicle . When concerned workman was found in the stolen car and when articles as referred above were recovered from him I feel that , was sufficient for the Enquiry Officer to conclude that, the concerned workman was guilty of the charge of misconduct as levelled against him in the charge sheet . Here one has to note that , it was a departmental enquiry and not an enquiry or investigation done by any Icgal authority . Besides it is to be noted that , probable or corroborative evidence can apply in the evidence recorded by the Enquiry Officer . Here admittedly the concerned workman was arrested by the Police . Admittedly he was prosecuted by the Police . Though he was acquitted by the Criminal Court, it does not mean that , he got blanket right to say that he was falsely prosecuted in the domestic enquiry also.

13. On has to note that, Police is an independent investigating machinery . It investigated the case of theft ofcarindependently. There was a complaint of the vehicle owner which was possessed by the concerned workman . It may be that, Criminal Court was not having sufficient evidence placed before it but it does not inean that , he was not concerned with it . Indian Evidence Act is not applicable to the domestic enquiry . In domestic enquiry if [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ] .

something is revealed, that is sufficient for such an Enquiry Officer to conclude that the charges levelled against the concerned workman are proved. As stated above , no provision of Indian Evidence Act are applicable to the departmental proceedings . Since the concerned workman was prosecuted and since he faced the criminal trial and record and proceedings reveal that , he was arrested by Police under the charge of theft of car , in my considered view, the finding given by the Enquiry Officer has substance and is just and proper . Besides, the concerned workman admits that, he participated in the enquiry. He admits that, he was permitted to take the help of Advocate to participate the enquiry. He admits that, he was served with charge sheet . He admits that , fair opportunity was giventohim to participate in the domestic enquiry. When all that is there and when he was arrested by the Police and prosecuted in my considered view , that is sufficient for the Enquiry Officer to reply and conclude that, charges levelled against the concerned workman were proved .

14. The citation referred by the 2nd Party published in 2008 II CLR page 77 ( Bombay High Court) in the case of Pandit Ladaku Patil v/s National Organic Chemicals (RCD) Ltd. and Ors . is on different footing and does not apply in the instant case . Even same can be observed about citation referred by the 2nd Party published in 2000 LAB . IC page 3754 ( Madras High Court) in the case of A.S. Moorthy v/s . Director General , CISFCGO and Ors .

15. So taking into consideration the case made out byboth, 1 conclude that , the enquiry was fair and proper and finding not perverse . Accordingly I answer the above Issues and passes the following order :

ORDER

(1 ) Enquiry is fair and proper ;

(2) Finding of the Enquiry Officer not perverse;

(3) Both the parties to participate on the quantum ofpunishment ;

A. A. LAD, Presiding Officer Bombay, 16-9-2009

नई दिल्ली, 13 नवम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 3319.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एच. पी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी -2/28 /2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-11-09 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-30012/2/2003- आई आर ( एम ) ]

कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 13th November , 2009 S. O. 3319. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/28/2003 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour, Court No. - 2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between employers in relation to the the management of HPCL and their 4233 GI /09-28

7883

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

workman, which was received by the Central Government on 13-11-2009 .

[ No. L-30012/2 /2003 -IR ( M) ]

KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 2 , MUMBAI

PRESENT

A.A. LAD, Presiding Officer

Reference No. CGIT-2 /28 of 2003 Employers in relation to the Management of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

The Chief Installation Manager ,

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Lube Plant- I , Haybunder Road ,

Mumbai -400 038

Firstparty V/s.

TheirWorkmen

Shri B.B. Yadav,

Naavneet Nagar , Chawl No. 2, R. No. 5 ,

NearBirla College ,

Kalyan, District Thane

Second Party

APPEARANCE

Forthe Employer : A.G. Nagvekar , Advocate For the Workmen : Mr. J.H. Sawant , Advocates .

Date ofpassing the Award : 8-09-2009 AWARD PART II

The matrix of the facts as culled out from the proceedings are as under :

1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L- 30012/2 /2003 - IR( M ) dated 21-5-2003 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d ) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the Management of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. , Lube Plant No.1 , Mazagaon , Mumbai by illegally terminating the services of Sh. B.B. Yadav w.e.f. 4-04-2002 is justified? If not , what relief the workman Shri B.B. Yadav is entitled to ? "

2. Claim statement is filed by the concerned workman at Exhibit 7 and Written Statement by the Ist Party at Exhibit 8. Issues were framed at Exhibit 14 and Award Part I was passed on 12th March , 2009 holding finding not preverse .

3. Reference was kept for recording evidence on the point of action taken by 1st Party . However , 2nd Party by Exhibit 21 informed that , he do not want to proceed withthe Reference . Hence , the order:

ORDER

In view of Exhibit 21 Reference is disposed off for want of prosecution.

Bombay,

8th September, 2009 .

A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer 7884

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/AGRAHAYANA 14, 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

EXB . NO . 21

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNEMNT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2 , MUMBAI Reference No. CGIT, 2/28 of 2003

HPCL

...First Party

The workman , B. B. Yadav .Second Party

Vs. Application for disposal of the reference for want of prosecution

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR

All India CPWD ( MRM) Karmachari Sanghathan , Nagpur (onbehalf of Shri Rizwan Khan) (Party No. 1) and the Executive Engineer , Central Public Works Deptt . , (Electrical) , Bungalow No. 17 /B , Civil Lines , Nagpur (Party No. 2) referred the same for adjudication to this Tribunal . vide its letter No. L-42012/ 130/2003 - IR( CM - II) dated 2-8- 2004 under clause ( d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947). The Ministry initially send the reference by its letter dt . 2-8-2004 . However , later on it has issued a corrigendum vide letterdt . 17-11-2005 correcting its earlier scheduled. The corrected scheduled is as follows .

The Second Party hereby prays that the Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to dispose of the reference as the Second Party is not interested in prosecuting the

proceedings. Mumbai Dated : 8-9-2009

Sd/- (B. B. Yadav) Second Party Sd/- (Illegible)

2. "Whether the contract between the management of CPWD, Nagpur and their contractor M/ s Agrawal Electrical Services was sham and camouflage , if so the demand of All India CPWD ( MRM) Karamchari Sangathan , Nagpur for reinstatement and regularization of Sh . Rizwan Khan , Wireman in the establishment of CPWD is legal and justified and to what benefit he is entitled to ? " नई दिल्ली , 13 नवम्बर , 2009 का.आ. 3320, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं सी. पी. डब्ल्यूडी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 72/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को13-11-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -42012 / 130/2003- आईआर ( सीएम- II ) ]

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 13th November , 2009

S.O. 3320. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 72/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour Court , Nagpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Central Public Works Department and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 13-11-2009 .

[No. L-42012/ 130/2003 - IR ( CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

3. Heard the counsel for the Petitioner . Nobody appeared for the respondent . The Petitioner has prayed to reinstate and regularize his services from the date of his initial appointment with consequential relief with the full back wages . It is the case of Petitioner Shri Rizwan Khan that he was employed as a Wireman w.e.f. 12-2-1999 and his services were illegally terminated with the malafide intension on 1-1-2003 . He had worked for more than 240 days in every year and thus he is in continuous service since 1999. Notice pay was not given to the workman at the time of termination of his service . No seniority list was maintained. It has violated the provision of Section 25( g ) and ( h) of ID Act . Currently he is out of employment and he has prayed as indicated above . Undisputedly , the Petitioners were engaged through contractor . They were the employees of the contractor. In view of the principles reported in Umadevi's case , it is clear that the management or employer can employ any workman on the contract basis , directly or indirectly . Admittedly they were engaged through contractor this itself indicate that they were the employees of the contractor . Therefore , there is no question of regularization when they were not at all the employees ofthe management CPWD .

ANNEXURE BEFORE SHRI A. N. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER , CGIT- CUM - LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR Date26-10-2009 Case No. CGIT/NGP /72 /2004

Petitioner/ Party No. 1

Shri J. S. Sudame , Secretary , All India CPWD ( MRM ) Karmachari Sanghathan , Takli seem Hingna Road , Post- Jaitala , Nagpur . ( on behalf of Shri Rizwan Khan )

Versus

Respondent/ Party No. 2

The Executive Engineer , Central Public Works Deptt . (Electrical ) , Bungalow No. 17 /B , Civil Lines , Nagpur

AWARD (Dated: 26th October , 2009)

4. Moreover, the contractor is not a party to the proceedings . Unless he is impeded as a party , there is no question of paying any compensation as per the provision of Section 25F and G. Similarly, when they are not the employees of the CPWD , they cannot be either reinstated or their service cannot be also regularized . Hence , the Petitioner is not entitled for the relief as prayed . The reference will have to be answered in negative . Accordingly, I pass the negative award that the Petitioner isnot entitled for any relief. Hence , the claim stands as rejected.

A. N. YADAV , Presiding Officer 1. The Central Government after satisfying the existence ofdispute between Shri J.S. Sudame , Secretary ,

Date: 26-10-2009 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 16 नवम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 3321.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार त्रिवेन्द्रम एयरपोर्ट ऑथोरिटी ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , इर्णाकुलम के पंचाट (संदर्भ सं. 151/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-11-09 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-11011/16/2002- आई आर( एभ ) ] कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 16th November, 2009 S. O. 3321. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , tentral Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. N ... 151 / 2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court , Ernakulam now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Trivandrum Airport Authority of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 16-11-09 .

[No. L- 11011/ 16/2002 - IR(M) ] KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM- LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM Present : Shri P.L. Norbert , B.A. , LL.B. Presiding Officer (Friday the 16th day ofOctober , 2009/24th Asvina, 1931 ) I.D. No. 151/2006

Workman : Sh . K.Prasad, T.C. No. 34/1129 (New TC No. 78/2468 ) , Sree Chitra Nagar, Near Airport , Vallakadavu P.O. , Trivandrum .

By Adv . Shri Anil Narayan Management: 1. The Airport Director , Trivandrum Airport Authority of India(NAD) , Trivandrum International Airport , Trivandrum - 695008

2. M/ s . R. K. Electricals , Mr. Sajith, Proprietor , PRA- 53 , Puthupally Lane, Medical College P.Ο. , Trivandrum - 695001

3. M/s . New Electricals , Sh . P.Balakrishnan , Proprietor , Sivachithanya , Kadakkal Lane , Kannamoola P.O. ,Trivandrum-695001 .

MI By Adv. Shri V. Santharam M2

M3- By Adv . Shri Ajith Prakash .

7885

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

This case coming up for hearing on 05-10-2009 , this Tribunal- cum- Labour Court on 16-10-2009 passed the following:

AWARD.

1. This is a reference made under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of Industrial Disputes Act . The reference is :

"Whether the demand of Shri K. Prased , an Electrician/ Wireman worked as a contract labour in the establishment of Airport Authority of India , Trivandrum Airport, International Airport Division , Trivandrum through the contractors ( 1 ) Shri Sajith , Proprietor , M/ s . R.K. Electricals , Contractors and Suppliers , Chackai , Trivandrum and (2 ) Shri P. Balakrishnan Nair , Proprietor, Kannamoola P.O. , Trivandrum - 11 for regularization as a Electrician/ Wireman , Airports Authority of India , Trivandrum Airport , Trivandrum with retrospective effect from 01-03-94 isjustified ( i) Whether the contract entered into between one M /s . R.K. Electricals and ( ii ) M/s . New Electricals , Contractors and the management of Airports Authority of India , Trivandrum Airport , Trivandrum was genuine or a sham contract? If so , to what relief the worker concerned is entitled to ? "

2. The facts of the case in brief are as follows :-

Shri K. Prasad was an Electrician- cum- Wireman . According to him he entered into service of International AirportAuthority of India, Trivandrum as contract labourer on 1-5-1991 in the electrical wing for work of installation , repair and maintenance of electrical fittings . He worked as such till 28-02-1994 . There were similar 23 other workers . All of them were controlled and supervised by Airport Director , Trivandrum. The workman completed 240 days of continuous service during a calendar year . He worked for a period of 33 months until he was denied employment by Airport Authority. Meanwhile he had made representation to the 1st management for absorption . Instead of considering his request he was denied employment on 28-02-1994 onwards . He filed O.P. 4507/1997 before the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala for absorption and attendant benefits . The Central Government bynotification dated 16-11-1999 under Section 10 of Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition ) Act , 1970 prohibited contract labour in electrical wing of Airport Authority . The electrical service in Trivandrum Airport is an integral part of functioning of Airport and the work is perennial in nature . While the Writ Petition filed by the worker as well as other workers were pending , the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided the Steel Authority of India Case . In the light of that decision the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala disposed of the OP of the worker directing hirn to approach Industrial Tribunal . Hence , this dispute . The contract between the Ist management and managements 2 and 3 is sham and a comouflage to deny benefits to the worker . The workman is entitled to be reinstated , absorbed and confirmed with all consequential benefits .

7886

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

Airport as Electrician . According to the workman he worked there from 01-05-1991 to 28-02-1994 for 33 months . But he admits that he entered service as contract labourer and there were similar other 23 contract workers in the electrial wing. But he contends that though he entered the service through contractor he was treated like a direct employee by International Airport Authority of India , Trivandrum and the so called contract is not a genuine one but a comouflage to deny benefits to workers . The contractors , managements 2 and 3 though filed written statement they have not stated anything about the nature of the contract . Their contention is that they had taken up contracts with International Airport Authority during the period 1991-94 . According to the management the repair and maintenance work in the electrical division of the Airport Authority was givenon contract and it is genuine .

3. The first management in their written statement contended that there is no master - servant relationship between the claimant and the 1st management . There is no notification prohibiting contract work in electrical division ofTrivandrum Airport under authority and hence this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the dispute . There were contracts in electrical department during 1991. When Airport Authority of India was taken over by International Airport Authority of India the existing contracts for maintenance of electrical installations and equipments were allowed to be continued as a stopgap arrangement . However, it is not correct to say that the claimant was controlled and supervised by Airport Director . Since he was only a contract worker he has no right for absorption under Airport Authority. All the Writ Petitions filed by contract workers were dismissed by Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in the light of the decision in SAIL's case , (2001 ) 7 SCC 1. Notification of 1999 under Section 10 of CLRA Act was quashed by Delhi High Court and was confirmed by Hon'ble Supreme Court. Hence there is no prohibition of contract labour in the electrical wing of Airport . At persent no contract labours are engaged for the alleged work. The nature of the work is not perennial and it is not essential part of the functioning of International Airport, Thiruvananthapurm . Normally labourers are taken through employment exchange. The claimant is not entitled for any preferential claim or absorption . There is neither appointment nor termination by Airport Authority.

4. The 2nd management , M /s . R.K. Electricals filed a separate written statement contending that there was a contract for carrying out day - to-day electrical repair works in Trivandrum Airport . However, the period mentioned in the claim statement relates to a subsequent period during which there was no contract between the Ist management and the 2nd management and hence the 2nd management is not aware of the contentions in the claim statement .

9. It is relevant to note that the workman has no consistent case regarding his employment . He seems to adapt pleadings suitable to the situation . Ext . MI is copy ofO. P. 4507/1997 filed by the claimant before the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala . There the contention is that he was a contract labourer engaged by M/ s . R.K. Electricals and New Electricals to work in the International Airport Authority of India , Trivandrum ( IAAI ), in the electrical wing , that there was a notification by the Central Government under Section 10 of Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition ) Act, 1970 prohibiting contract work in sweeping , cleaning , dusting and watching buildings owned and occupied by Central Government establishments , that there is no justification for excluding the job of electrical/wiring work from the purview of the notification and that exclusion of electrical work from the notification is discriminatory and violative of the fundamental right of equality guaranteed under A- 14 of the Constitution . The relief sought in the O. P. wasto direct the Central Government to include electrical/wiring and maintenance work in the 1976 notification and also to direct Airport Authority to absorb the contract labour (23workers).

5.The 3rd management M/s . New Electricals in their written statement contended that they had contract with International Airport Authority till 1994 and there were several contract workers . The claimant might have worked underNew Electricals . The 3rd management is not aware of the rest of the contentions in the claim statement .

6. In the light of the above contentions the following points arise for consideration :

1. Are the contracts sham or genuine ?

2. Is the claimant entitled for reinstatement and absorption?

7. The evidence consists of the oral testimony of WWs.1 and 2 and the documentary evidence of Exts . W1 to W- 57 on the side ofthe claimant and MW1 and Exts . MI to M -20 on the side of the management .

8. Point Nos . 1 & 2:- It is an admitted fact that the workman Sri . K. Prasad was working in the Trivandrum

10. Ext . P2 in Ext . M1 is a statement filed before Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) claiming pay parity with the regular workers in the electrical wing of Airport Authority. The claim petition before the Assistant Labour Commissioner was moved by the Union . It is contended that the 23 workers are contract labourers defined under CLRA Act . The 2nd and 3rd managements in Ext. P2 in Ext. Ml are contractors and the first management is the principal employer . It is stated in para 3 that both contractors had engaged 23 workers on the basis of licences obtained by them from competent authority under the Act . Resorting to different provisions of CLLRA Act and the Central Rules 1971 (especially Rule 25 ) the union claimed before ALC that the contract workers were entitled to get wages which is not less than rates prescribed under Minimum Wages Act . The rule provides that the contract workers , who are doing the same or similar kind of work as direct employees of the principal employer , are entitled to 7887 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5, 2009/अग्रहायण 14 , 1931

sham contract is permissible , then the question that is posed for consideration is whether the contract is factually and really sham.

12. The Hon'ble supreme Court in workmen of Nilgiri Co-operativeMarketing Society Ltd. v. State of T.N. and Others (2004) 3 SCC 514 has laid down the test to know the nature of the contract. In para 37 it is observed as follows: - get the same rate of wages , holidays , hours of work and other conditions of service of direct employees . However the contractors were not paying wages and other benefits accordingly. The rule provides that when the contractor fails to pay wages as mentioned above the principal employer is bound to pay such wages with arrears . Hence the Assistant Labour Commissioner was requested to conciliate and persuade the management to pay arrears of wages after fixing the wages in accordance with Rule 25. Ext. W- 11 is a notice of Labour Enforcement Officer ( Central ) to M/s . New Electricals directing them to reply to the request of the workman and other workers for payment of wages in accordance with Rule 25 of CLRA Rules, 1971 . Thiswas the position until 1997 .

"The control test and the organization test , therefore , are not the only factors which can be said to be decisive . With a view to elicit the answer , the court isrequired to consider several factors which would have a bearing on the result : (a) who is the appointing authority; (b) who is the paymaster; ( c) who can dismiss. ( d) how long alternative service lasts; ( e) the extent of control and supervision; (f) the nature of the job e.g.whether it is professional or skilled , work; ( g ) nature of establishment; ( h ) the right to reject".

13. There is admittedly neither an appointment order nor a termination order issued to the workman by the principal employer . The pleading of the worker is that he entered service initially through contractor . Therefore the IstManagement is not the appointing authority .

14. However it is contended by the workman that he was supervised and controlled by the Director of the Airport as well as other regular employees of the Airport. The workman was examined as WWI . According to him he was supervised and controlled by Assistant Engineer by name Thankappan initially and thereafter by regular workers of the electrical section by name Bhamadevan , Mohanan and Shaji . But neither the Assistant Engineer nor the other regular workers are summoned to support the case of the workman . There is only the ipse dixit of workman . He has also not summoned only of the contractors to say that none of their men had controlled or supervised him. No doubt MW1 , the Manager ofElectrical Wing of IAAI has no knowledge about the supervision and control as he was in Bombay Airport duing the relevant time( 1991-94) . But the burden is on the workman to prove the fact of supervision and control. It was submitted by the learned counsel for the workman that to support the contention regarding control and supervision the attendance register and log book were summoned from the custody of the principal employer . But they were not produced. It is to be noted that the case of the principal employer is that they have no direct relationship with the workman . He was an employee of the contractor . They filed an affidavit stating that the attendance register log book , wage register etc. are in the custody of contractors and not with the principal employer . In view of this stand of the principal employer , the workman could have summoned at least one of the contractors or called for the above documents from their custody . If in fact, the worker was a contract labourer naturally the principal employer 11. It appears that O.P. 4507/97 was filed on the basis of thejudgment in Air India Statutory Corporation v . United Labour Union ( 1997 ) 9 SCC 377 wherein it was held that on publication of notification under Section 10 ofCLRA Actprohibiting contract labour in any category the contract labour would automatically become employees of the principal employer . The attempt of the worker in the O.P. was to get the prohibition notification extended to Electrical wing and seek absorption as per the decision in Air India Statutory Corporation case . But before the O.P. was finally taken up for decision the verdict in Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. National Union Water front workers (2001 ) 7 SCC 1 came out. The constitution bench over ruled prospectively the decision in Air India Statutory Corporation case . On the basis of the decision in Sail's case O.P. was disposed ofby High Court on 03-10-2001 by Ext . W- 54 judgment leaving the parties to work out their remedies on the basis ofthe decision in Sail's case . Thereafter a claim was made before the Assistant Labour Commissioner , Trivandrum by the workman on 14-03-2002 and it is Ext . W-5. There it is contended that though he entered service as contract labour he was supervised and controlled by the Director of Airport and the contract is sham and he is entitled to be reinstated and absorbed . On failure of the conciliation the reference was made . In the claim statement filed before this court it is contended that though he entered service as contract labourer the contract is sham and he is really an employee of the Airport Authority. It is observed in Sail's case that if the contract is found to be not genuine but a mere camouflage the so - called contract labour will have to be treated as employees of the principal employer and shall bedirected to regularise the service of such contract labour by the principal employer [ para 125 (5 ) of the decision ] . With this in mind the pleadings were shaped in this case . That is how the contention regarding sham contract is taken up . But a person who accuses the management for entering into sham contracts , cannot be dishonest in his own pleadings . He is chopping and changing his stand suitable to the occasion . Having fought a losing battle in the previous round of litigations he has come up with a new plea of sham contract to reap the benefit of the decision in Sail's case . The inconsistency in his plea shakes the very foundation ofhis case . But assuming that the plea of 7888

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

different sequel by absorption of contract labour by principal employer or by a lesser or harsher punishment ... The relevant portion reads :-

would not maintain attendance register and log book regarding him and his work. The burden is on the workman to prove that he was really supervised and controlledby the officers of principal employer. His own statement will not be sufficient to prove that fact .

"The principle that a beneficial legislation needs to be construed liberally in favour of the class for whose benefit it is intended, does not extend to reading in the provisions ofthe Act what the legislature has not provided whether expressly or by necessary implication , or substituting remedy or benefits for that provided by the legislature....

15. It is admitted by WW 1 that wage was paid by contractor (page 30 of WW1 ) . Ext . W - 11 also supports the case ofthe management that wage was paid by contractors and not by principal employer. Thus the pay master was the contractor .

16. According to WW 1 the disciplinary authority wasthe Airport Authority. He says that disciplinary action was taken against one Krishnan Thampi . But other than his own statement neither Krishnan Thampi is summoned nor any record of disciplinary action is called for to prove the contention. He has not given details of charge and the nature of the punishment imposed on Krishnan Thampi . A sweeping statement regarding some action is not sufficient . According to the workman leave applications were submitted to Assistant Engineer of Airport Authority. But there are no records to prove it . Not even a copy of leave application is produced by the workman.

Admittedly, when the concept of automatic absorption of contract labour as a consequence of issuing notification under S. 10 ( 1 ) by the appropriate Government , is not alluded to either in Section 10 or at any other place in the Actand the consequence of violation of Sections 7 and 12 ofthe CLRA Act is explicitly provided in Sections 23 and 25 of the CLRA Act , it is not for the High Courts or this Courtto read insome unspecified remedy in Section 10 or substitute for penal consequences specified in Section 23 and 25 a different sequel , be it absorption of contract labour in the establishment of principal employer or a lesser or a harsher punishment . Such an interpretation of the provisions of the statute will be far beyond the principle of ironing out the creases and the scope of interpretative legislation and as such , clearly impermissible . "

17. The nature of the work done by the workman is skilled. There can be no dispute that electrical repair and maintenance work in the Airport is essential part of the work of Airport for the smooth functioning of the Airport and hence it is a work of perennial nature . But that does not necessarily mean that no contract labour were engaged . There is no harm in continuing to engage contract workers till contract labour is prohibited by notification u/s . 10 of CLRA Act .

Thus none of the contentions of the workman can stand the test of sham contract laid down in Nilgiri case .

Besidesprovisoto S.7 stipulates that the registering officer may entertain any application for registration after the expiry of the period fixed for registration under Section 7th if sufficient cause is shown . Therefore the fact that there is no registration during the period from 1991 to 1996 doesnot by itself give an indication that the contracts of that period are sham . Though the principal employer has taken up a contention in the written statement that till the International Air Port Authority started functioning in full swing the prior contract of Air Port Authority was continued as a stopgap arrangement , the same is not substantiated .

18. It is lastly contended by the learned counsel for the workman that there is no registration under Section 7 of CLRA Act during the period 1991-94 enabling the principal employer to engage contract labour. Ext . W- 16 is registration certificate issued by competent authority on 22-3-1996. But the workman was in service from 1-5-1991 to 28-2-1994 and there was no registration during that period. Hence it is argued that there could be no valid contract during that period. Therefore the workman is to be treated as an employee of the principal employer and absorbed.

20. Though contract labour in the electrical wing of International Airport Authority of India is prohibited under Section 10 of CLRA Act as per Ext . W - 8 notification dated 16-11-1999 , Ext . M - 20 and M - 19 orders of Hon'ble Delhi High Court and Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave petition reveal that the notification was quashed by Delhi HighCourt and it was confirmed by Supreme Court . In the 1976 notification , work in electrical division was not included. Hence there is no prohibition of contract labour in the electrical wing unlike contended by the workman .

In the light of the reasons aforesaid I hold that the contracts are genuine and the workman was only a entract worker under different contractors and he is not entitled for absorption or reinstatement by the principal employer . It is held in Sail's case para 125 ( 6) that if the contract is found to be genuine and there is prohibition notification under Section 10 of CLRA Act and if the principal employer intends to employ regular workmen the erstwhile contract labour shall be given preference , if necessary, by relaxing the conditions with regard to age , academic qualifications etc. So far as the present case is concerned since there is no notification prohibiting contract labour the workman is 19. S. 7 of CLRA Act says that the contravention of any provision of the Act is punishable under Section 23 of the Act. S. 9 says that no principal employer shall employ contract labour without registering the establishment withinthe time fixed for that purpose . The violation of S.9 is punishable under Section 23 of the Act . It is observed in Dena Nath V. National Fertilizers Ltd. (1992 ) 1 SCC 695 that non registration by principal employer under the Act will not mean that contract labour engaged shall be deemed to be direct employees of the principal employer . It is also observed in Sail's case para 105 that the consequence of violation of S. 7 and 12 of CLRA Act is explicitly provided in S. 23 and 25 of CLRA Act and court cannot substitute for penal consequences specified in S. 23 and 25 by a [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

7889

भारत का राजपत्र : दिसम्बर 5 , 2009/अग्रहायण 14, 1931

not entitled for preferential treatment in employment . Since he was only a contract labour when the period of contract came to an end his work also came to an end.

In the result an award is passed finding that the demand of the workman Shri K. Prasad for regularization as Electrician/ Wireman by Airport Authority of India , Trivandrum is not legal or justified, that the contract entered into between Ms. R. K. Electricals and M/s . New Electricals and management of Airport Authority of India is genuine and that he is not entitled for any relief.

The award will come into force one month after its publication in the official gazette.

Dictated to the Personal Assistant , transcribed and typed by her , corrected and passed by me on this the 16thday of October, 2009 .

P.L. NORBERT, Presiding Officer

Appendix

Witness for the Workman

WWI

24-5-2007

K. Prasad

WW2

27-4-2009

Shibu Robert Witness for the Management

MW1

27-7-2009

Sanjeev Menghal Exhibits for the Workman

Temporary permit to Sri . Prasad for the period 16-2-1993 to 2-3-1993 .

W2 Request ofNew Electricals to Manager , IAAI , Trivandrum Airport to issue temporary pass to Prasad w.e.f. 25-12-1993 .

W3 Certificate issued by R. K. Electricals to Prasad.

W4 Appointment Order issued by R. K. Electricals to Prasad .

W5 Statement of claim before ALC , Tvm . by Prasad on 14-3-2002 .

W6 Counter Statement of Management dtd . 19-4-2002.

W7 Minutes ofConciliation dtd . 12-9-2002 .

W8 Government notification dated 16-11-1999 .

W9 Application ofPrasad on 11-8-2007 for post of Junior Attendant (Engg.- Electricals) .

W10 Representationto consider for preferential consideration over ad - hoc employees in view of Sail's case .

W11

Notice of Labour Enforcement Officeto M/s . New Electricals regarding reply to request of Prasad & Ors . to pay wages .

W12

Letter of Public Information Officer to Prasad asking to pay application fee and copying charges for getting information .

W13

Information furnished .

W14

Gazette notification regarding functioning ofIAAI w.e.f. 1-1-1991 .

W15

Minutes of 94th meeting of 1AA1 .

W16

Certificate of Registration dated 22-3-2002 .

W17 Letter of Executive Engineer dated 26-11-1992 to Jelitta Co. for paper publication .

W18

Press Notification .

W19

Office note issued by Sr. Personnel Manager dated 17-2-1995 .

W20

Office note issued by Executive Engineer dated 21-2-1995 .

W21 Details of power supply .

W22

Details of direct Electrical Employees .

W23

Cash receipt .

W24 Letter of PIO to Prasad dated 23-1-2009 .

W25-

Letter of PIO to Prasad dated 30-1-2009.

W26 Acknowledgement Card .

W27

Application dated 11-3-2009 for information under RTI Act .

W28 Replyto W-27 .

W29

Letter of PIO to worker dated 15-4-2009 .

W30 Cash Receipt .

W31 Letter of PIO dtd : 8-4-2009 to workman .

W32 Letter dtd. 2-4-2009 of General Manager (Law) .

W33

Letter ofPIO.

W34 Copy ofjudgment in OP 39071/01 of Hon'ble High Court .

W35 Order of Deputy Chief Labour Commissionerdtd : 30-4-2001 .

W36 Letter dated 5-8-1992 sent to Airport Director by another worker.

W37 Joining report of another worker to Director.

W38 Joining report of another worker to Director.

W39 Office Order of Airport Authority dtd . 10-8-1992 .

7890

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : DECEMBER 5 , 2009/ AGRAHAYANA 14 , 1931

W40

Office Order of Airport Authority dtd . 1-5-1997 .

W41 Contract Agreements .

W42

W43 do

W44 do

W45

W46

W47 do

W48

W49

W50

Letter of officer of ALC( C) dtd . 3-4-2008 furnishing information to Prasad under RTIAct.

W51 Application to ALC u /RTI Act for informationdtd. 15-3-2008 .

W52

Letter of Deputy Labour Officer to Prasad dtd. 12-12-1994 asking him to meet the officer.

W53

Judgment in OPs 3169 , 13606/94 and 196/ 95 and 1757/99 ofA.C.

W54 Counter affidavit of Management in OP 4507 ofHon'ble High Court .

Exhibits for the Management

Certified copy of the Original Petition 4507/97.

Agreement No. 46/EE( E) AMED/ TVM / 93-94 between I.A.A.I. and M/ s. R. K. Electricals (Original) .

Agreement No. 32 /EE( E ) AMED/ TVM / 93-94 between I.A.A.I. and M/s . New Electricals (Original) .

Agreement No. 38 /EE( E) AMED/TVM/ 93-94 between I. A.A.I. and M / s . New Electricals (Original ).

AgreementNo. 48 /EE( E ) AMED /TVM/ 93-94 between I.A.A.I. and M / s . R. K. Electricals (Original) .

Agreement No. 22 /EE ( E ) AMED /TVM/ 93-94 between I. A. A.I. and M / s . R. K. Electricals (Original) .

[PART 11-SEC . 3( ii )] M7

Agreement No. 28 /EE ( E) AMD( E )/TVM / 92-93 between 1. A.A.1 . and M / s . R. K. Electricals (Original ) .

Agreement No. 15 /EE ( E) AMD ( E )/ TVM/ 92-93 between 1.A.A.1 . and M / s . R. K. Electricals (Original) .

Agreement No. 8/ EE( E ) AMD( E)/TVM/ 92-93 between 1. A.A.1 . and M / s . R. K. Electricals (Original) .

M10

Agreement No. 1 /AMSD ( E )/ TVM/ 92-93 between I.A.A.I. and M/ s . New Electricals ( Original ) .

M11

Agreement No. 6/EE( E) AMED/TVM / 92-93 between 1.A.A.I. and M / s . New Electricals (Original ) .

M12

Agreement No. 1 /EE( C ) AMD ( E)/TVM / 91-92 between 1. A.A.I. and M / s . R. K. Electricals (Original) .

M13

Agreement No. 32 /EE ( E ) AMD ( E )/TVM / 92-93 between I.A. A.I. and M/ s . R. K. Electricals (Original ) .

M14

Agreement No. 27 / EE( E ) AMD ( E)/ TVM/ 92-93 between 1. A.A.I. and M/ s . New Electricals (Original) .

MIS

Agreement No. 36/EE( E ) AMD( E )/TVM / 92-93 between 1.A.A.1 . and M/ s . New Electricals (Original).

M16

Agreement No. 9 /EE( C) AMD( E) / TVM/ 91-92 between I. A. A.I. and M/ s . New Electricals (Original ).

M17

Agreement No. 11 /EE( C ) AMD( E)/ TVM / 91-92 between I.A.A.I. and M / s . R. K. Electricals (Original ) .

M18

Agreement No. 6/ EE( C ) AMD ( F ) /TVM/ 91-92 between I. A.A.I. and M / s . New Electricals (Original) .

M19

Orderof Supreme Court dismissing Special Leave Petition .

M20

Judgment of Delhi High Court ( DB ) in LPA No. 530/2002 confirming single Bench Judgment quashing notification of 16-11-1999 .

Printed by the Manager , Govt. of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 .