This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्रीसं. डी. एल. (एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

REGD . NO. D. L. (N ) 04 /0007/2003-05

सत्यमेव जयते भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 10]

No. 10

नई दिल्ली, फरवरी 28- मार्च6 , 2010 , शनिवार/फाल्गुन 9 - फाल्गुन 15 , 1931 ] NEW DELHI, FEBRUARY 28-MARCH 6, 2010 , SATURDAY / PHALGUNA 9 - PHALGUNA 15, 1931

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II- खण्ड -उप- खण्ड ( ii ) PART II-Section 3-Sub- section (ii )

भारंत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

कार्मिक लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय ( कार्मिक एवं प्रशिक्षण विभाग )

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PANSIONS

नई दिल्ली, 22 फरवरी , 2010

(Department of Personnel and Training) New Delhi , the 22nd February , 2010

का.आ. 631.-दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 की धारा 5 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के साथ पठित दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 की धारा 6 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) के अंतर्गत केन्द्र सरकार पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य सरकार गृह (राजनीतिक ) विभाग , गुप्त अनुभाग 3 द्वारा जारी अधिसूचना सं. - 1545 - थाना दिनांक- 13-11-2009 की सहमति से लेक थाना मुकदमा सं. - 325/2008 दिनांक 14 दिसम्बर , 2008 , जो कि भारतीय दण्ड संहिता , 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम-45 ) की धारा-120B/420 के अंतर्गत दर्ज है , के विविध प्रावधानों के उल्लंघन एवं इससे संबंधित विविध धाराओं के अधीन मामले और उक्त मामले से संबंधित अथवा संसक्त प्रयत्न ( नों ) , दुष्प्रेरण और षड़यंत्र तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए अथवा उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किसी अन्य अपराध ( धों ) का अन्वेषण करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार संपूर्ण पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य पर करती है ।

S.O. 631. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1) of Section 5 read with section 6 ofthe Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 (Act No. 25 of1946), the Central Government with the consent of the State Government ofWest Bengal , Home ( Political ) Department , Secret Section- 3 , vide Notification No. 1545 -P.S. dated 13th November , 2009, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction ofthe members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole ofthe State of West Bengal for investigation ofCase No. 325 of 2008 dated 14-12-2008 under Sections 120- B and 420 ofthe Indian Penal Code , 1860 ( Act No. 45 of 1860) registered at Police Station Lake , Kolkata and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with the above mentioned offences and any other offence/offences committed in the course ofthe same transaction or arising out of the same facts .

[ सं.228/63 /2009 - ए.वी.डी- II ] चन्द्र प्रकाश, अवर सचिव

( 1255 )

[No. 228/ 63 /2009 - AVD - II ] CHANDRA PRAKASH , Under Secy.

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

1256

New Delhi , the 24th February, 2010 नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2010

S.O. 632. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946) , the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Arunachal Pradesh , Department of Food and Civil Supplies , Civil Secretariat , Itanagar vide Order No. SF & CS-40/2008 dated 26th June , 2009, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the state of Arunachal Pradesh for investigation of the offences under sections 120 -B , 420 , 467 , 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860 ) and section 13 ( 1)( d) read withsection 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act , 1988 (Act No.49 of 1988 ) and any other offences of fraud allegedly committed by Sh . H. Rahman, Manager (QC ), FCI , North Lakhimpur relating to Hill Transport Subsidy to supply of sugar in Arunachal Pradesh in connivance with other unknown persons and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with the above mentioned offences and any other offence/offences committed in the course of the same transaction or arising outof the same facts .

का.आ. 632.-केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम , 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए अरुणाचल प्रदेश राज्य सरकार , खाद्य और नागरिक आपूर्ति विभागं , सिविल सचिवालय , ( ईटानगर की 26 जून , 2009 के आदेश सं. एस.एफ. एण्ड सी. एस. -40/2008 द्वारा प्राप्त सहमति से अन्य अज्ञात व्यक्तियों की मिलीभगत से अरुणाचल प्रदेश में चीनी आपूर्ति करने के लिए हिल ट्रांसपोर्ट सब्सिडी के संबंध में श्री एच . रहमान , प्रबंधक ( क्यूसी ) एफसीआई , नार्थ लखीमपुर द्वारा अन्य कथित धोखाधड़ी के अपराध के संबंध में भारतीय दण्ड संहिता , 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 120 - बी , 420 , 467, 468 , और 471 तथा भ्रष्टाचार निवारण अधिनियम , 1988 ( अधि- नियम सं. 40 ) की धारा 13 ( 1 )/ ( डी) सपठित धारा 13 ( 2 ) के अधीन दर्ज अपराधों के लिए तथा उसी संव्यवहार के अनुक्रम में किए गए संसक्त प्रयत्न , दुष्प्रेरणों और अथवा षड़यंत्रों और उन्हीं तथ्यों से उद्भूत किन्हीं अन्य अपराधों का अन्वेषण करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और अधिकारिता का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण अरुणाचल प्रदेश राज्य पर करती है ।

[No. 228/34/2009-AVD-II ] CHANDRA PRAKASH , Under Secy.

[सं. 228/34//2009- ए.वी.डी- II ]

चन्द्र प्रकाश , अवर सचिव

वित्त मंत्रालय

( वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 19 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 633.-सरकार स्थान ( अप्राधिकृत अधिभोगियों की बेदखली ) अधिनियम , 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए और दिनांक 7-1-2007 के भारत सरकार , वित्त मंत्रालय , आर्थिक कार्य विभाग , ( बैंकिंग प्रभाग ) की अधिसूचना सं. 65 (2 ) /2007 - बीओ- II का अधिक्रमण करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा सरकार के राजपत्रित अधिकारी के स्तर के समकक्ष अधिकारी होने पर निम्नलिखित सारणी के कालम ( 2 ) में उल्लिखित अधिकारियों को उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजन के लिए सम्पदा अधिकारियों के रूप में नियुक्तकरती है , जो सारणी के कालम ( 3 ) , में उल्लिखित सरकारी स्थानों के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम द्वारा या उसके अधीन अधिकारियों को प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करेंगे और उन्हें सौंपे गए कर्तव्यों को पूरा करेंगे:-

सारणी

सरकारी स्थानों की श्रेणियां तथा क्षेत्राधिकार की स्थानीय सीमाएं अधिकारी का पदनाम

क्रम सं.

(3)

(1 ) (2)

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य में स्थित स्थान।

1. सहायक महाप्रबंधक , विधि विभाग , यूको बैंक , मुख्यालय, 10 , बीटीएम सारणी , कोलकाता -700001

2. अंचल प्रबंधक , अंचल कार्यालय , लखनऊ , यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में स्थित स्थान।

स्काईलार्क बिल्डिग , 28 , नवल किशोर रोड , लखनऊ-226001

3. अंचल प्रबंधक , अंचल कार्यालय , रायपुर ,

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा छत्तीसगढ़ राज्य में स्थित स्थान।

छत्तीसगढ;, आई हास्पीटल कैम्पस, तैलीयाबंध , रायपुर-492006

4. अंचल प्रबंधक, अंचल कार्यालय , मेरठ , सी- यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा उत्तरांचल राज्य में स्थित स्थान।

2/6 , डी ब्लॉक , कृष्णा प्लाजा , गंगा नगर ,

मवाना रोड , मेरठ -250001 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

1257 (1)

(2)

(3)

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा झारखण्ड राज्य में स्थित स्थान ।

5. अंचल प्रबंधक, अंचल कार्यालय , रांची, राजेन्द्र जवान भवन, कम सैनिक बाजार , मेन रोड, रांची-834001

6. अंचल प्रबंधक, अंचल कार्यालय , यूको बैंक , 5 संसद मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110001

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र दिल्ली और जम्मूएवं कश्मीर राज्य में स्थित स्थान । 7. अंचल प्रबंधक, अंचल कार्यालय , यूको बैंक , यूको बैंक बिल्डिंग -169, थंबूचेटी स्ट्रीट, चैन्नई-600001

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा तमिलनाडु राज्य तथा पांडिचेरी संघ राज्य क्षेत्र में स्थित स्थान । 8. सहायक प्रबंधक, अंचल कार्यालय, यूको बैंक मफत लाल सेन्टर ( द्वितीय तल ) नरीमन पाइंट, मुम्बई -400021

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा महाराष्ट्र एवं गोवा राज्य तथा दमन एवं दीव संघ राज्य क्षेत्र , दीव क्षेत्र के स्थितस्थान।

तथा विहार राज्य में स्थित स्थान। यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए 9. अंचल प्रबंधक , अंचल कार्यालय , यूको बैंक , ' मौर्य लोक', ' ए ' ब्लॉक , चौथा तल , डाक बंगला रोड, पटना-800001

यूकोबैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा उड़ीसा राज्य में स्थित स्थान।

10. अंचल प्रबंधक, अंचल कार्यालय , यूको बैंक, यूको बैंक बिल्डिंग, सी-2, अशोक नगर , यूनिट- II , भुवनेश्वर-751009

11. अंचल प्रबंधक, अंचल कार्यालय , यूको बैंक , मणिराम , दीवान रोड, सिलपुखुरी , गुवाहाटी-781003

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा असम , मेघालय , त्रिपुरा , मणिपुर , नागालैंड , अरुणाचल प्रदेश और मिजोरम राज्य में स्थित स्थान।

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा गुजरात राज्य में स्थित स्थान ।

12. अंचल प्रबंधक, अंचल कार्यालय, यूको बैंक , यूको भवन, पोस्ट बॉक्स नं. 4085 सन्यास आश्रम के निकट, आश्रम रोड, अहमदाबाद-380009

13. अंचल प्रबंधक, अंचल कार्यालय , यूको बैंक , एससीओ - 55-57, बैंक स्क्वायर, सैक्टर 17 बी, चण्डीगढ़ -160017

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा पंजाब एवं हरियाणा राज्य तथा चण्डीगढ़ संघ राज्य क्षेत्र में स्थित स्थान।

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा राजस्थान राज्य में स्थित स्थान।

14. अंचल प्रबंधक, अंचल कार्यालय, यूको बैंक , आर्केड इंटरनैशनल अजमेर रोड, सिविल लाइन्स, जयपुर-302016 ( राजस्थान)

15. अंचल प्रबंधक, अंचल कार्यालय , यूको बैंक , ई/5 , अरेरा कालोनी , भोपाल-462016

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में स्थित स्थान ।

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा कनार्टक राज्य में स्थित स्थान।

16. अंचल प्रबंधक , अंचल कार्यालय , यूको बैंक , यूको बैंक बिल्डिंग , 13/22 , कैपेगोडा रोड, बेंगलूर-560009

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य में स्थित स्थान।

17. अंचल प्रबंधक, अंचल कार्यालय , यूको बैंक , पो.बा. सं. 59 , हिमलैण्ड होटल, सर्कुलर रोड , शिमला-171001

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य में स्थित स्थान। www

18. अंचल प्रबंधक, अंचल कार्यालय , यूको बैंक , 8-2-64 , भूतल , रोड नं. 10, बंजारा हिल्स, हैदराबाद-500034

यूको बैंक के अपने अथवा उसके द्वारा अथवा उसकी ओर से पट्टे पर लिए गए तथा केरल राज्य में स्थित स्थान ।

19. अंचल प्रबंधक , 39:3720, एफ. एस. आर. कॉम्पलैक्स, रजनीपुरम रोड , एर्नाकुलम-682016 केरल

[फा. सं. 65 /2/2007- बीओ -11 ]

एस. गोपाल कृष्ण, अवर सचिव [PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 6, 2010 /PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

1258

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Financial Services )

New Delhi , the 19th February, 2010

S.O. 633. In exercise of the powers conferredby Section 3 of Public Premises ( Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants ) Act , 1971 (40 of 1971 ) and in supersession of the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance . Department of Financial Services , No. 65 (2)/2007 - BO- II dated 7-1-2007, the Central Government hereby appoints the officers mentioned in column (2) of the Table below, being officers equivalent to the rank of a Gazetted Officer of Government to be Estate Officers for the purpose of the said Act , who shall exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties imposed on the Estate Officer by or under the said Act, in respect of the public premises specified in column (3 ) of the said Table :

TABLE

Sl . No. Designation ofthe Officer

Categories ofPublic Premises And Local Limits of Jurisdiction

(3)

(1) (2)

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of West Bengal .

1. Asstt . General Manager , Law Department , UCO Bank , Head Office , 10 , B. T. M. Sarani , Kolkata- 700001.

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Uttar Pradesh .

2. Zonal Manager , Zonal Office , Lucknow Skylark Building , 28 Nawal Kishore Road , Lucknow - 226001.

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Chattisgarh.

3. Zonal Manager , Zonal Office, Raipur , Chattishgarh Eye Hospital Campus , Teliabandha, Raipur -492006 .

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Uttaranchal .

4. Zonal Manager , Zonal Office , Meerut , C-2/6, D. Block, Krishna Plaza , Ganganagar , Mawana Road, Meerut -250001

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Jharkhand.

5. Zonal Manager , Zonal Office , Ranchi , Rajendra Jawan Bhavan cum Sainik Bazar MainRoad, Ranchi - 834001 .

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the National Capital Territory ofDelhi and State of, Jammu and Kashmir .

6. Zonal Manager , Zonal Office , UCO Bank , 5, Sansad Marg , NewDelhi-110001 .

7. Zonal Manager , Zonal Office , UCO Bank. UCO Bank Building 169 , Thambu Street , Chetty Chennai-600001.

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Tamilnadu and inthe Union Territory of Pondicherry , Andmans and Nicobar Islands.

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the States of Maharashtra and Goa and Diu area in the Union Territory of Daman and Diu.

8. Asstt . General Manager , Zonal Office, UCO Bank Mafatlal Centre (2nd Floor) , Nariman Point , Mumbai-400021 .

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Bihar .

9. Zonal Manager, Zonal Office , UCO Bank, 'Mauryalok ' , ' A' Block, 4th floor , DakBungalow Road , Patna- 800001 .

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Orissa .

10. Zonal Manager, Zonal Office, UCO Bank UCOBank Building , C- 2, Ashok Nagar , Unit- II , Bhubaneswar - 751009.

11. Zonal Manager , Zonal Office , UCO Bank, Maniram Dewan Road , Silpukhuri ,, Guwahati-781003 .

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Assam , Meghalaya, Tripura, Manipur, Nagaland , Arunachal Pradesh andMizoram.

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Gujarat.

12. Zonal Manager , Zonal Office , UCO Bank , UCO Bhawan, PB No. 4085 , Near Sanyas Ashram , Ashram Road , Ahmedabad - 380009 .

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Punjab and Haryana and in the Union Territory of Chandigarh .

13. Zonal Manager , Zonal Office , UCO Bank, S. C. O. 55-57 , Bank Square , Sector - 17B , Chandigarh - 160017.

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

(1)

(2)

14. Zonal Manager , Zonal Office , UCO Bank, Arcade International , Ajmer Road, Civil, Lines, Jaipur -302016, (Rajasthan) .

15. Zonal Manager , Zonal Office , UCO Bank, E/5, Arera Colony, Bhopal -462016 .

16. Zonal Manager , Zonal Office , UCO Bank, UCO Bank Building , 13/22 , Kempegowda Road,Bangalore-560009.

17. Zonal Manager , Zonal Office , UCO Bank , P. B. No. 59, Himland Hotel , Circular Road, Shimla- 171001.

18. Zonal Manager , Zonal Office , UCO Bank, 8-2-64Gr . Floor , Road No. 10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500

19. Zonal Manager , 39/3720 F , S. R. Complex , Ranipuram Road, Ernakulam-682016, Kerala.

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 634. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक ( समनुषंगी बैंक ) अधिनियम, 1959 ( 1959 का 38 ) की धारा 26 की उप- धारा ( 2क ) के साथ पठित धारा 25 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ग ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करने के पश्चात्, एतद्वारा , श्री पी. नरसिम्हा , सहायक महाप्रबंधक , स्टेट बैंक आफ हैदराबाद को अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्षों की अवधि के लिए अथवा स्टेट बैंक आफ हैदराबाद के अधिकारी के रूप में उनके पद छोड़ देने तक अथवा अगले आदेशों तक , इनमें से जो भी पहले हो , स्टेट बैंक आफ हैदराबाद के निदेशक मण्डल में अधिकारी कर्मचारी निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।

[ फा. सं. 8/6//2009- बीओ -1 ] सुमिता डावरा, निदेशक New Delhi , the 23rd February , 2010

S.O. 634. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (cb) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 25 read with sub- section (2A) of Section 26 of the State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks ) Act , 1959 (38 of 1959 ), the Central Government , after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India , hereby nominates Shri P. Narasimha , Assistant General Manager , State Bank of Hyderabad, as Officer Employee Director on the Board of Directors of State Bank ofHyderabad for a period of three years from the date of notification or until he ceases to be an officer of the State Bank of Hyderabad or until further orders , whichever is theearliest.

F. No. 8 /6/2009 -BO -1 ] SUMITA DAWRA , Director

1259 (3)

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Rajasthan .

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Madhya Pradesh.

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Karnataka .

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Himachal Pradesh .

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Andhra Pradesh .

Premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of the UCO Bank and situated in the State of Kerala .

[F. No. 65 (2)/2007 -BO- II ] S. GOPAL KRISIINA , Under Secy.

वित्त मंत्रालय

(राजस्व विभाग )

केन्द्रीय उत्पाद एवं सीमा शुल्क मुख्य आयुक्त का कार्यालय विशाखपट्टणम , 19 फरवरी , 2010

संख्या 1 /2010-सीमा-शुल्क ( गै.टे. )

का.आ. 635.-भारत सरकार , वित्त मंत्रालय , राजस्व विभाग , नई दिल्ली की अधिसूचना संख्या 33 /94- सी.शु . ( गै.टे. ) , दिनांक । जुलाई , 1994 यथा संशोधित अधिसूचना संख्या 122/2004- सी.शु. (गै.टे) , दिनांक 25-10-2004 के अन्तर्गत प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैं , आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य के श्री पोट्टी श्रीरामुलु नेल्लूर जिले के मुथुकुरू मंण्डल में स्थित कृष्णापटनम ग्राम को सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 52 ) के खण्ड 9 के अन्तर्गत भांडागार केन्द्र घोषित करता हूँ ।

[ फा. सं. VIII/40/03/2009-मुआ. ( वि.क्षे. ) ( भाग -1) ] सी. माथुर , मुख्य आयुक्त MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue)

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE

Visakhapatnam , the 19th February, 2010 No. 1/2010- Customs (N.T. )

S.O. 635. In exercise of the powers conferred by Notification No. 33 /94- Cus . ( N.T. ) , dated 1-7-1994 as amended by Notification No. 122/2004- Cus . (NT ) , dated 25-10-2004 of the Government of India , Ministry ofFinance , Department of Revenue , New Delhi , hereby declare [PART 11-SEC. 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6, 2010/PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

1260

(ग) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv) में उल्लिखित सामाजिक विज्ञान में अनुसंधान अथवा सांख्यिकीय अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

Krishnapatnam Village , Muthukur Mandal , Sri Potti Sriramulu Nellore District, in the State of Andhra Pradesh to be a Warehousing Station , under Section 9 of the Customs Act , 1962 (52 of 1962 ) .

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा [F. No. VIII/40/03 /2009 -CC ( VZ) (Part I )] C. MATHUR , Chief Commissioner

( केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )

नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2010

(ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड (iii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 12/2010/फा. सं. 203/23/2009-आ.का.नि. - 11 ] डॉ. संजय कुमार लाल , अवर सचिव

(Central Board of Direct Taxes ) New Delhi , the 24th February , 2010 का.आ. 636.-सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिससूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5ग और 5 ड़ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( iii) के प्रयोजनार्थ कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2009-2010 के आगे से संगठन महिला मंडल बाड़मेर आगोर , बाड़मेर , राजस्थान को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगे ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थात्: -

(i) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;

(ii) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा;

S.O. 636. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Mahila Mandal Barmer Agor(MMBA) , Barmer , Rajasthan has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( iii ) of sub-section ( 1) of Section 35 ofthe Income- tax Act , 1961 (saidAct) , read with rules 5C and 5E of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 ( said Rules )from Assessment year 2009-2010 onwards in the category of ' Other Institution ' partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely :-

(i ) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for research in social sciences;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out research in social science or statistical research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशिके संबंध में अलग खाता बही रखेगा अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप-धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;

(iv) अनुमोदित संगठन सामाजिक विज्ञान में अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षकं द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित ऐसे विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

(iii) The approved organization shall maintain separate books ofaccounts in respect ofthe sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section ( 2 ) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income-tax or the Director of Income - tax having jurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 139 of the said Act; 2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(क) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ (iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहींरखेगा; अथवा

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for research in social sciences and a copy of such statement duly certifiedby the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above .

(ख) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

1261 3. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization :-

( a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii) of paragraph 1 ; or

( iv) अनुमोदित संगठन सामाजिक विज्ञान में अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित ऐसे विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।

2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii) of paragraph 1 ; or

(क) पैराग्राफ । केउप- पैराग्राफ (iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations rceived and sums applied for research in social sciences or statistical research referred to in sub- paragraph ( iv) of paragraph 1 ; or

( ख) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा (d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or

(ग ) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ (iv ) में उल्लिखित सामाजिक विज्ञान में अनुसंधान अथवा सांख्यिकीय अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा

(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( iii ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 ofthe said Act, read with rules SC and 5E ofthe said Rules .

(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा [Notification No. 12/2010/F. No. 203/23/2009/ITA- 11 ] Dr. SANJAY KUMAR LAL , Under Secy . नई दिल्ली, 24 फरवरी , 2010

(ङ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड (iii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।

[अधिसूचना सं. 11 /2010/फा. सं. 203/160/2009-आ.क.नि. - 11 ] डॉ. संजय कुमार लाल, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 24th February, 2010 का.आ. 637. सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिससूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5 ग और 5ड़ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2008-2009 के आगे से संगठन एशियन हेल्थ केयर फाउंडेशन, हैदराबाद को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन आंशिक रूप से अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगे ' अन्य संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है, अर्थात्:-

S.O. 637. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Asian Health Care Foundation , Hyderabad, has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of sub - section (1) of Section 35 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (said Act), read with rules 5C and SE of the Income- tax Rules , 1962 (said Rules) from Assessment year 2008-2009 onwards in the category of other Institution ' partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely:-

(i) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;

(ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students;

(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता बही रखेगा अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि दर्शाई गई हो, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;

1262

MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING

New Delhi , the 9th February , 2010 furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income- tax or the Director of Income- tax havingjurisdiction over the case , by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub- section ( 1) of Section 139 of the said Act;

(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above.

S.O. 638. In continuation of this Ministry's Notification of even number , dated 10-11-2009 and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 ofthe Cinematograph Act, 1952 (37 of 1952 ) read with rules 7 and 8 of the Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 1983 , the Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri Jennings Jacob as a member of the Thiruvanantha- puram Advisory panel of the Central Board of Film Certification with immediate effect for a period of two years oruntil further orders , whichever is earlier.

3. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval ifthe approved organization : --

[F. No. 809 /6/2009 -F (C ) ] AMITABH KUMAR , Director ( Films) नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2010

(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub - paragraph ( iii) of paragraph 1 ; or

(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub- paragraph (iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or

(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations rceived and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub - paragraph ( iv) of paragraph 1 ; or

का.आ. 639.-इस मंत्रालय के दिनांक 10-11-2009 के समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के क्रम में तथा चलचित्र ( प्रमाणन ) नियम , 1983 के नियम 7 एवं 8 के साथ पठित चलचित्र अधिनियम , 1952 (1952 का 37 ) की धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार श्री एम. साई प्रसाद को तत्काल प्रभाव से दो वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक , इनमें से जो भी पहले हो , केन्द्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड के हैदराबाद सलाहकार पैनल का सदस्य नियुक्त करती है ।

(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or

[फा. सं. 809/3/2009 - एफ ( सी) ] अमिताभ कुमार , निदेशक ( फिल्म)

NewDelhi , the 9th February, 2010 (e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 ofthe said Act , read with rules 5C and SE ofthe said Rules .

[Notification No. 11 /2010 /F . No. 203 /160/2009-1TA - 11 ] Dr. SANJAY KUMAR LAL , Under Secy .

सूचना एवं प्रसारण मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 9 फरवरी , 2010

S.O. 639. In continuation of Ministry's Notification of even number , dated 10-11-2009 and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 ofthe Cinematograph Act , 1952 (37 of 1952 ) read with rules 7 and 8 of the Cinematograph ( Certification) Rules , 1983 , the Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri M. Sai Prasad as a member ofthe Hyderabad Advisory panel of the Central Board of Film Certification with immediate effect for a period of two years or until further orders , whichever is earlier .

[F. No. 809/3 /2009 -F (C ) ] AMITABH KUMAR , Director (Films ) नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2010 का.आ. 638.-इस मंत्रालय के दिनांक 10-11-2009 के समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के क्रम में तथा चलचित्र ( प्रमाणन ) नियम, 1983 के नियम 7 एवं 8 के साथ पठित चलचित्र अधिनियम , 1952 (1952का 37 ) की धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार श्री जेनिंग्स जैकब को तत्काल प्रभाव से दो वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक , इनमें से जो भी पहले हो , केन्द्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड के तिरुवनंतपुरम सलाहकार पैनल का सदस्य नियुक्त करती है।

का.आ. 640.- इस मंत्रालय के दिनांक 10-11-2009 के समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के क्रम में तथा चलचित्र ( प्रमाणन ) नियम, 1983 के नियम 7 एवं 8 के साथ पठित चलचित्र अधिनियम , 1952 (1952का 37 ) की धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार श्री सोहन प्रसाद को तत्काल प्रभाष से दो वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक , इनमें से [फा. सं. 809/6/2009- एफ ( सी) ] अमिताभ कुमार , निदेशक ( फिल्म) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1263

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

जो भी पहले हो , केन्द्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड के कोलकत्ता सलाहकार पैनल का सदस्य नियुक्त करती है।

[फा. सं. 809/3/2008- एफ ( सी ) ] अमिताभ कुमार , निदेशक ( फिल्म) New Delhi , the 9th February, 2010 S.O. 640. In continuation of this Ministry's Notification of even number , dated 11-11-2009 and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 of the Cinematograph Act , 1952 (37 of 1952 ) read with rules 7 and 8 of the Cinematograph ( Certification) Rules , 1983 , the Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri Sohan Prasad as a member of the Kolkata Advisory panel of the Central Board of Film Certification with immediate effect for a period of two years or until further orders, whichever is earlier .

[ F. No. 809/3/2008 - F(C) ] AMITABH KUMAR , Director (Films) नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 641. इस मंत्रालय के दिनांक 10-11-2009 के समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के क्रम में तथा चलचित्र ( प्रमाणन ) नियम, 1983 के नियम 7 एवं 8 के साथ पठित चलचित्र अधिनियम , 1952 (1952 का 37 ) की धारा 5 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार श्री रमन बक्शी को तत्काल प्रभाव से दो वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक , इनमें से जो भी पहले हो , केन्द्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड के दिल्ली सलाहकार पैनल का सदस्य नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. 809/8/2009- एफ ( सी) ] अमिताभ कुमार , निदेशक ( फिल्म) New Delhi , the 9th February, 2010

S.O. 641. In continuation of this Ministry's Notification of even number , dated 10-11-2009 and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 ofthe Cinematograph Act , 1952 (37 of 1952 ) read with rules 7 and 8 of the Cinematograph ( Certification) Rules , 1983 , the Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri Raman Bakshi as a member of the Delhi Advisory panel of the Central Board of Film Certification with immediate effect for a period of two years or until further orders , whichever is earlier .

[F. No. 809/8 /2009 - F ( C ) ] AMITABH KUMAR , Director ( Films) नई दिल्ली , 9 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 642,- इस मंत्रालय के दिनांक 10-11-2009 के समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के क्रम में तथा चलचित्र ( प्रमाणन ) नियम, 1983 के नियम 7 एवं 8 के साथ पठित चलचित्र अधिनियम , 1952 (1952 का 37 ) की धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार निम्नलिखित व्यक्तियों को तत्काल 688GI /10--2

प्रभाव से दो वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अंगले आदेश होने तक , इनमें से जो भी पहले हो , केन्द्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड के मुम्बई सलाहकार पैनल का सदस्य नियुक्त करती है ।

क्रम सं.

नाम

1 . श्रीमती मीना शर्मा 2. श्री राजाराम जगन्नाथ ताना वाड़े [फा. सं. 809/7/2009- एफ ( सी ) ] अमिताभ कुमार , निदेशक ( फिल्म) New Delhi , the 9th February, 2010

S.O. 642. In continuation of this Ministry's Notification of even number , dated 10-11-2009 and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 of the Cinematograph Act , 1952 (37 of 1952 ) read with rules 7 and 8 of the Cinematograph ( Certification) Rules, 1983 , the Central Government is pleased to appoint the following persons as a members of the Mumbai Advisory panel of the Central Board of Film Certification with immediate effect for a period of two years or until further orders , whichever is earlier .

Name

SI . No.

(1) Smt. Meena Sharma

(2) Shri Rajaram Jagannath Tanawade

[F. No. 809/ 7/2009 - F ( C) | AMITABH KUMAR , Director (Films ) नई दिल्ली , 9 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 643. इस मंत्रालय के दिनांक 11-11-2009 के समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के क्रम में तथा चलचित्र ( प्रमाणन ) नियम , 1983 के नियम 7 एवं 8 के साथ पठित चलचित्र अधिनियम , 1952 (1952 का 37 ) की धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार निम्नलिखित व्यक्तियों को तत्काल प्रभाव से दो वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक, इनमें से जो भी पहले हो , केन्द्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड के गुवाहाटी सलाहकार पैनल का सदस्य नियुक्त करती है।

क्रम सं.

नाम 1 . श्रीमती जिमोनी चौधरी 2. श्रीमती बसंती बोरा

3. श्री हरे कृष्ण डेका

4. श्री प्रफुल्ल दत्त

[फा. सं. 809/5/2008 - एफ ( सी) ] अमिताभ कुमार , निदेशक ( फिल्म) 1264

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/ PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

New Delhi , the 9th February, 2010 S.O. 643.In continuation of Ministry's Notification of even number, dated 11-11-2009 and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 ofthe Cinematograph Act , 1952 (37 of 1952 ) read with rules 7 and 8 of the Cinematograph ( Certification) Rules , 1983 , the Central Government is pleased to appoint the following persons as members of the Guwahati Advisory panel of the Central Board of Film Certification with immediate effect for a period of two years or until further orders , whichever is carlier.

Nane

SI . No.

(1) Smt. Jimoni Choudhury

(2) Smt . Basanti Bora

(3) Shri Hare Krishna Deka

(4) Shri Prapulla Dutta

[F. No. 809/5/2008 - F( C) ] AMITABH KUMAR , Director (Films) नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2010 का.आ. 644.-इस मंत्रालय के दिनांक 10-11-2009 के समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के क्रम में तथा चलचित्र ( प्रमाणन ) नियम, 1983 के नियम 7 एवं 8 के साथ पठित चलचित्र अधिनियम , 1952 (1952का 37 ) की धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार निम्नलिखित व्यक्तियों को तत्काल प्रभाव से दो वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक, इनमें से जो भी पहले हो , केन्द्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड के चेन्नई सलाहकार पैनल का सदस्य नियुक्त करती है।

नाम

क्रम सं.

डॉ. जोस्फीन

श्रीमती क्रीतिका राधाकृष्णन

श्रीमती चंद्रिका राजाराम 3.

4. श्रीमती वी. पदमा ( उर्फ ) ए. मंगई

श्रीमती शेलजा रामजी

श्रीमती कौशल्या शिवकुमार 7 .

श्रीमती रेवथी कृष्ण

श्रीमती शीला चार्ल्स मोहन [फा. सं. 809/ 1/2009- एफ ( सी ) ] अमिताभ कुमार, निदेशक ( फिल्म)

New Delhi , the 9th February, 2010 S.O. 644. In continuation of Ministry's Notification of even number , dated 10-11-2009 and in

[PART 11 SEC. 3 ( ii) | exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 ( 37 of 1952 ) read with rules 7 and 8 of the Cinematograph ( Certification) Rules , 1983 , the Central Government is pleased to appoint the following persons as members of the Chennai Advisory panel of the Central Board of Film Certification with immediate effect for a period of two years or until further orders , whichever is earlier .

SI . Name No.

1. Dr. Josephine

2. Smt. Krithika Radhakrishnan

3. Smt . Chandrika Rajaram

4. Smt . V. Padma ( alias ) A. Mangai

5. Smt . Shylaja Ramji

6. Smt . Kausalya Sivakumar

7. Smt . Revathi Krishna

8. Smt. Sheila Charles Mohan

[F. No. 809/ 1 /2009 - F ( C ) ] AMITABH KUMAR , Director (Films ) नई दिल्ली , 10 फर्वरी , 2010

का.आ. 645.-इस मंत्रालय के दिनांक 10-11-2009 के समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के क्रम में तथा चलचित्र ( प्रमाणन ) नियम, 1983 के नियम 7 एवं 8 के साथ पठित चलचित्र अधिनियम , 1952 (1952 का 37 ) की धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार निम्नलिखित व्यक्तियों को तत्काल प्रभाव से दो वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक , इनमें से जो भी पहले हो , केन्द्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड के बेंगलूर सलाहकार पैनल का सदस्य नियुक्त करती है।

नाम

क्रम सं.

1 .

श्रीमती जमुना मंजु

प्रो. बगिया एन. एच.

3. श्रीमती शीला रामचंद्र रेड्डी

4. श्रीमती मंगला प्रकाश

5. श्रीमती सुधा बोरेगोवडा

6. श्रीमती रेगुका रेड्डी

7. श्रीमती बबिता एम. हैरिस

8. श्रीमती प्रमोदिनी

9. श्रीमती सौभाग्य लक्ष्मी

[फा. सं. 809/5/2009- एफ ( सी) ] अमिताभ कुमार, निदेशक ( फिल्म ) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010 /फाल्गुन 15, 1931

1265 New Delhi , the 10th February, 2010

नई दिल्ली, 18 फरवरी , 2010

S.O. 645. In continuation of this Ministry's Notification of even number , dated 10-11-2009 and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 of the Cinematograph Act , 1952 ( 37 of 1952 ) read with rules 7 and 8 of the Cinematograph ( Certification) Rules , 1983 , the Central Government is pleased to appoint the following persons as members of the Bangalore advisory panel of the Central Board of Film Certification with immediate effect for a period of two years or unit further orders , whichever is earlier .

Sl . Name No.

का.आ. 647.- इस मंत्रालय के दिनांक 10-11-2009 के समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के क्रम में तथा चलचित्र (प्रमाणन ) नियम, 1983 के नियम 7 एवं 8 के साथ पठित चलचित्र अधिनियम , 1952 (1952 का 37) की धारा 5 की उप - धारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार श्री किशेर बेनानी, निवासी 4 विजय अपार्टमेंट, 67 सेंट जोसफस ऐवेन्यूनजदीक बिलिंगटन, जीमखाना , सांताक्रुज ( प. ) मुम्बई -400054 को श्री कासनभाई सोराथिया के स्थान पर तत्काल प्रभाव से दो वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक , इनमें से जो भी पहले हो, केन्द्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड के मुम्बई सलाहकार पैनल का सदस्य नियुक्त करती है । 1. Smt. Jamuna Manju

[फा. सं. 809/7/2009 - एफ ( सी) । अमिताभ कुमार , निदेशक ( फिल्म ) 2. Prof. Bhagya N. H.

New Delhi , the 18th February, 2010

3. Smt . Sheela Ramachandra Reddy

4. Smt . Mangala Prakash

5. Smt . Sudha Boregowda

6. Smt . Renuka Reddy

7. Smt . Babitha M. Harrys

8. Smt . Promodhini

9. Smt . Soubagya Lakshmi

[F. No. 809 /5 /2009- F ( C) ] AMITABH KUMAR , Director ( Films )

S.O. 647. In continuation of this Ministry's Notification of even number , dated 10-11-2009 and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 5 of the Cinematograph Act , 1952 (37 of 1952 ) read with rules 7 and 8 of the Cinematograph ( Certification) Rules , 1983 , the Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri Kishore Benani , r/ o 4 , Vijay Apartment , 67. St. Josephs Avenue , Near Willington Gymkhana , Santacruz ( W). Mumbai -400054, in place of Shri Kasambhai Sorathia, as a member of the Mumbai Advisory panel of the Central Board of Film Certificatiion with immediate effect for a period of two years or unit further orders , whichever is earlier.

नई दिल्ली , 16 फरवरी , 2010

[F. No. 809/ 7/2009 -F ( C ) ]

AMITABH KUMAR, Director ( Films)

स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय

( स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण विभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 8 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 646.-इस मंत्रालय की दिनांक 5-2-2008 एवं 27-5-2008 के समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के क्रम में तथा चलचित्र (प्रमाणन) नियम, 1983 के नियम 3 के साथ पठित चलचित्र अधि नियम , 1952 ( 1952 का 37 ) की धारा 3की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार श्री अजय बिजली के स्थान पर श्री पंकज शर्मा को तत्काल प्रभाव से तथा अगले आदेश होने तक केन्द्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड का सदस्य नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. सं. 809/11 /2007- एफ ( सी ) खण्ड- II ] अमिताभ कुमार , निदेशक ( फिल्म)

का.आ. 648. केन्द्र सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 2) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद से परामर्श करने के बाद एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , अर्थात् :-

NewDelhi , the 16th February , 2010

2. महाराष्ट्र स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , नासिक द्वारा प्रदत्त दन्त चिकित्सा डिग्रियों को मान्यता के संबंधित चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग । में डॉ. डी. वाई. पाटिल डेंटल कॉलेज एवं अस्पताल , पिम्परी , पुणे के बारे में क्रम संख्या 60 के XIII के सामने स्तम्भ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में उसके अंतर्गत निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां जोड़ी जाएंगी :

" दन्त शल्य चिकित्सा में निष्णात

S.O. 646. In continuation of this Ministry's Notification of even number , dated 5-2-2008 and 27-5-2008 and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1) of Section 3 of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 ( 37 of 1952 ) and with rules 3 of the Cinemationgraph ( Certification) Rules , 1983 , the Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri Pankaj Sharma in place of Shri Ajay Bijli as a member ofthe Central Board of Film Certification with immediate effect and until further orders .

पेरियोडोंटिक्स (यदि यह 14-7-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो ) एमडीएस ( पेरियां. ) , महाराष्ट्र स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय, नासिक

[F. No. 809/ 11/2007 - F ( C )-Pt . [ 1 ] AMITABH KUMAR, Director ( Films) 1266

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6, 2010/PHALGUNA 15, 1931

एमडीएस ( मुख्य आयुर्विज्ञान ) , महाराष्ट्र स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , नासिक एमडीएस ( आर्थो. ) , महाराष्ट्र स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , नासिक । "

मुख्य चिकित्सा और रेडियोलाजी (यदि यह 18-7-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो ) आर्थोडोंटिक्स (यदि यह 16-7-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

[फा. सं. बी. -12017/3/2005- डीई ] आर. शंकरन , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (Department of Health and Family Welfare) New Delhi , the 8th February , 2010

S.O. 648. In cxercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (2 ) of Secrion 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 (16 of 1948 ) , the Central Government , after consultation with the Dental Council of India, hereby makes the following amendments in Part - 1 of the Schedule to the said Act , namely

2. In the existing entries of column 2 and 3 , against XIII of Serial No. 60 in respect of Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital Pimpri , Pune , in Part I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by Maharashtra University ofHealth Sciences , Nasik , the following entries shall be inserted thereunder :

"Master ofDental Surgery

MDS (Perio . ) Maharashtra University ofHealth Sciences , Nashik Periodontics (ifgranted on or after 14-7-2009)

MDS (Oral Med. ) Maharashtra University of Health Sciences , Nashik OralMedicine and Radiology (if granted on or after 18-7-2009)

Orthodontics (if granted on or after 16-7-2009)

MDS(Ortho . ) Maharashtra University ofHealth Sciences , Nashik . " (No. V.12017/3/2005 - DE ]

R. SANKARAN , Under Secy . नई दिल्ली , 8 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 649. केन्द्र सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्:

2. दन्त चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में एच. पी . विश्वविद्यालय , शिमला द्वारा प्रदत्त डेंटल डिग्रियों को मान्यता देने के संबंध में क्रम संख्या 52 के सामने स्तम्भ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां उसके अन्तर्गत रखी जाएंगी:-

"!! एच. पी. सरकारी दंतचिकित्सा महाविद्यालय एवं अस्पताल शिमला ( एच.पी. )

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ] ( 11 ) दंत शल्यक्रिया निष्णात (i ) ओरल एंड मैक्सिलोफेसियल सर्जरी

एम.डी.एस. ( ओरल एंड मेक्सि सर्जरी ) एच. पी. विश्वविद्यालय , शिमला

(यदि 23-9-2009 को या इसके बाद की गई हो)

एम.डी.एस. ( पेरियो. ) एच. पी. विश्वविद्यालय , शिमला (ii) पेरियोडोन्टिक्स ( यदि 25-9-2009 को या इसके बाद की गई हो)

एम.डी.एस. (सामु. दंतचिकित्सा) एच. पी. विश्वविद्यालय , शिमला (iii ) सामुदायिक दंत चिकित्सा (यदि 1-10-2009 को या इसके बाद की गई हो )

(iv) आर्थोडोन्टिक्स

एम.डी.एस. ( आर्थों ) एच. पी. विश्वविद्यालय , शिमला । " (यदि 6-10-2009 को या इसके बाद की गई हो )

[ फा. सं. बी.-12017/18 /2003 - डी.ई. ] आर. शंकरन , अवर सचिव New Delhi , February , 2010

S.O. 649. In exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub - section ( 2 ) of Section 10 if the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) , the Central Goverment , after consultation with the Dental Council of Indi ... hereby makes the following amendments in Part - 1 of the Schedule to the said Act, namely:

2. In the existing entries of column 2 and 3. against Serial No. 52 in Part - I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) , pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by H.P. University Shimla, the following entries shall be inserted thereunder :

" II . IH.P. Government Dental College and Hospital , Shimla (H.P. )

(ii) Master ofDental Surgery

MDS (Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery) , H.P. University Shimla

(i) Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (if granted on or after 23-9-2009)

MDS ( Periodontics). H.P. University, Shimla.

(ii) Periodontics (ifgranted on or after 25-9-2009)

(iii) Community Dentistry (ifgranted on or after 1-10-2009)

MDS(Community Dentistry), H.P. University, Shimla

MDS (Orthodontics ) , H.P. University. Shimla . " (iv) Orthodontics (ifgranted on or after 6-10-2009 )

[No. V.12017 / 18 /2003 - DE ] R. SANKARAN, Under Secy .

[ भाग II- खण्ड ( ii) ]

1267 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

नई दिल्ली, 10 फरवरी , 2010

24-9-2009 )

(ix) Community Dentistry (if granted on or after 24-9-2009)

का.आ. 650.-केन्द्र सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग-1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्:-

University, Faizabad (U.P.) MDS ( Community Dentistry) Dr. R.M.L. Awadh University, Faizabad (U.P. ) " [No. V. - 12017/ 20/2003 - DE ] R. SANKARAN , Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 22 फरवरी , 2010

2. दन्त चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में डॉ. राम मनोहर लोहिया अवध विश्वविद्यालय , फैजाबाद ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) द्वारा प्रदत्त डेंटल डिग्रियों को मान्यता देने के संबंध में क्रम संख्या 55 के सामने स्तम्भ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां उसके अन्तर्गत रखी जाएंगी:- "i सरदार पटेल दंत चिकित्सा एवं आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान , लखनऊ

( ii ) मास्टर ऑफ डेंटल सर्जरी

का.आ. 651. केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम, 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 12 की उप- धारा ( 2) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए और भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् केन्द्र सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की दूसरी अनुसूची में एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्:-

(vii) ओरल पैथोलाजी (यदि 19-9-2009 को या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

एम.डी.एस. ( ओरल पैथोलॉजी ) डॉ. आर. एम. एल. अवध विश्वविद्यालय, फैजाबाद ( उत्तर प्रदेश)

(viii) ओरल मेडिसिन

(यदि 24-9-2009 को या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

उक्त अनुसूची में शीर्षक " नेपाल " के अंतर्गत , " बी. पी. कोइराला स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान संस्थान , धारन , नेपाल " के सामने " शीर्षक " ( इसके आगे स्तम्भ ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ) , डिप्लोमा में यथा उल्लिखित अर्हताओं का स्वरूप [ इसके आगे स्तम्भ ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] और संक्षेपण ( इसके आगे स्तम्भ ( 4 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] शीर्षों के अंतर्गत , अंतिम प्रविष्टि और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित को रखा जाएगा , अर्थात्: -

एम.डी.एस. ( ओरल मेडिसिन ) डॉ. आर. एम. एल. अवध विश्वविद्यालय, फैजाबाद ( उत्तर प्रदेश)

(4)

(ix) कम्युनिटी डेंटिस्ट्री

( यदि 24-9-2009 को या इसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

एम.डी.एस. ( कम्युनिटी मेडिसिन) डॉ. आर. एम. एल. अवध विश्वविद्यालय , फैजाबाद ( उत्तर प्रदेश) । "

(2) "एमडी (3) " आयुर्विज्ञान 'त्वचा विज्ञान वाचस्पति ( त्वचा एवं एसटीडी ) । " विज्ञान एवं एसटीडी) "

[फा. सं. बी. -12017/20/2003 - डी.ई. ] आर. शंकरन , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 10th February , 2010

बी.पी. के आई एच. एस. धारन, नेपाल ( यह मान्यता प्राप्त अर्हता होगी यदि यह बी. पी. कोइराला स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान संस्थान , धारन , नेपाल में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे छात्रों के लिए बी. पी . कोइराला स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान संस्थान , धारन , नेपाल सम - विश्वविद्यालय ) द्वारा 2002 को या इसके बाद प्रदान की गईहो।

S.O. 650.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 (16 of 1948 ) , the Central Governinent , after consultation with Dental Council of India , hereby makes the following amendments in Part - 1 of the Schedule to the said Act , namely:

[ फा. सं. वी. - 11015/ 1/2009 - एम.ई. ( नीति-1 ) ] अनिता त्रिपाठी , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 22nd February , 2010 2. In the existing entries of column 2 and 3 , against Serial No. 55 in Part- 1 of the Schedule to the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) , pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Awadh University, Faizabad ( U.P. ) , the following entries shall be inserted thereunder

" I. Sardar Patel Institute of Dental and Medical

S.O. 651. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 2 ) of the Section 12 of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) the Central Government , after consulting the Medical Council of India , hereby makes the following further amendments in the Second Schedule in the said Act , namely:

Sciences , Lucknow

(vii) Master ofDental Surgery

( i) Oral Pathology

MDS ( Oral Pathology)

(if granted on or after

Dr. R.M.L. Awadh

19-9-2009)

(viii) Oral Medicine

University , Faizabad (U.P. ) MDS ( Oral Medicine)

(if granted on or after

Dr. R.M.L. Awadh

In the said Schedule under the heading "Nepal ". against " B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences , Dharan, Nepal ," under the headings ' Title ' [ hereinafter referred to as column ( 2 ) ] , ' Nature of qualifications as stated in diploma ( hereinafter referred to as column (3) ] and "Abbreviation " [ hereinafter referred to as column (4 ) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto the following shall be inserned namely :-

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 6 , 2010/PHALGUNA 15, 1931

1268

"MD "Doctor in (Dermato- Medicine logy and ( Dermatology and STD)" STD

B.P.K.I.H.S. Dharan , Nepal [This shall be a recognised qualification when granted by B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences , Dharan , Nepal [Deemed University) in respect ofstudents being trainedat B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences , Dharan , Nepal on or after 2002]

[No. V- 11015/ 1 /2009 -ME- P - 1 ] ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secy.

विद्युत मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 5 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 652.- केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप- नियम (4) के अनुसरण में पावरग्रिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया लि. , गुड़गांव , एमएचपीसी लिमिटेड , फरीदाबाद तथा एनटीपीसी लिमिटेड , नई दिल्ली के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन कार्यालयों का जिनके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारीवृंद ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है :

1. पावरग्रिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया लि. , एनएच -31 , बाई पास , मरंगा , 400/220 के.वी. नई पूर्णियां, 220/132 , के. बी0 पूर्णियां सब स्टेशन , पिन-854301 ( बिहार )

2. नर्मदा हाइड्रोइलैक्ट्रिक डेवेलपमेंट कारपोरेशन लिमिटेड, इंदिरा सागर पावर स्टेशन , नर्मदा नगर , जिला खंडवा ( म. प्र. )-450119

3. एनटीपीसी लिमिटेड, दक्षिणी क्षेत्र मुख्यालय, द्वितीय व पांचवीं मंजिल , एमसीएच कमर्शियल कॉम्पलैक्स, आर. पी . रोड , सिकन्दराबाद -500003

4. पावरग्रिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया लिमिटेड , 400/220 के.वी. उप केन्द्र , 10वीं कि.मी. वानि विलास सागर रोड , बीरेनहल्लि ग्राम , हिरियूर ताल्लुक , चित्रदुर्ग जिला-572144

5. पावरग्रिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया लिमिटेड , 2×500 मे. वा. एचवीडीसी , बैक टू बैक कोल्हापुर स्टेशन, प्लाट नं. 5 , 36/0/6 ,

[PART 11 SEC. 3 ( 6 ) | ज्ञानदेव को- आपरेटिव हाउसिंग सोसाइटी, ताराबाई पार्क, कोल्हापुर-416005 ( महाराष्ट्र)

6. पावरग्रिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया लिमिटेड, पार्बती परिषण प्रणाली, हमीरपुर , वार्ड-1 , ( माइक्रोवेव टॉवर के पास कृष्णानगर, हमीरपुर-177001 ( हि. प्र. )

[सं.-11017/4/2010 - हिंदी] एम. रविकांत, संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF POWER

New Delhi , the 5th February, 2010

S.O. 652. In pursuance of sub rule (4) ofRule 10 of the Official Language (use for official purposes of the union ) Rules , 1976 the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices under the administrative control of Powergrid Corporation of India Ltd. , Gurgaon , NHPC Limited, Faridabad and NTPC Ltd. , New Delhi , the staff whereof have acquired 80 % working knowledge of Hindi:----

1. Powergrid Corporation of India Ltd., NH-31 , By pass Maranga, 400/220 , KV New Purnea and 220/132 KV Purnea Sub Station, Pin-854301 ( Bihar )

2. Narmada Hydroelectric Development Corporation India Sagar Power Station , Narmada Nagar, Distt . Khandwa ( MP )-450119

3. NTPC Limited, Southern Region Headquarters , 2nd and 5th Floor, MCH Commercial Complex, R. P. Road, Secunderabad - 500003

4. Powergrid Corporation of India Ltd.. 400/220 , KV Sub Station , 10th K.M. Vani Vilas Sagar Road, Beerenahalli Village , Hiriyur Taluk , Chitra Durga -572144

5. Powergrid Corporation of India Ltd.. 2× 500 MW , HVDC, Back - to -Back Kolhapur Station , Plot No. 5, 36/A/6 , Dnyandeo Co - operative Housing Society, Tarabai Park , Kolhapur - 416005 (Maharashtra ) 6. Powergrid Corporation of India Ltd. , Parbati Transmission System , Hamirpur , Ward- 1 , Near Microwave Tower, Krishna Nagar , Hamirpur - 177001 ( H.P. )

[No. 11017/4/2010 - Hindi ] M. RAVIKANTH . Jt . Secy .

[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1269

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

( उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, । फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 653.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स टुलिप मास्टेक , खसरा नं. 555/0 , विलेज टकसाल , निकट शिव मंदिर, परवानू द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " टीएमएफ " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक रोड वेब्रिज ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम "टुलिप" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 09/373 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक रोड वेब्रिज ) उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

TULIPMASSTEK

सीलिंग डायग्राम

स्कंल डिजीटाइजर में 4 कोनों में 4 पंच हैं जो ऊपरी बाडी को निचली बाडी से जोड़ते हैं । इनमें से दो पेच हैडलैस हैं और जिन की नोक पर छेद है । ये दोनों हैडलैस पेच एक दूसरे के साथ विकर्णतः जुड़े हुए हैं । पंच के छेद में से , सील तार निकल सकती है और सील को प्लग और स्टाम्प किया जा सकता है । स्टाम्पिंग से पहले बाडी को बंद करने के लिए पेच कसा जाता है और यह तब तक बाहर नहीं आ सकता जब तक सील को तोड़ा न जाए । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और कंन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मंक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 और 5 × 10 *, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 278 ) /2008 |

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 /PHALGUNA 15, 1931

1270

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

New Delhi , the 1st February, 2010

S.O. 653. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Electronic Road Weighbridge) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy Class - III ) of series "TMF" and with brand name " TULIP " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Tulip Masstek , Khasra No. 555/0 , Village Taksal , Near Shiv Mandir , Parwanoo and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 09/ 373 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Road Weighbridge) with a maximum capacity of 50 tonne and minimum capacity of 100 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 5kg. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

MODEL TMF -BOT

50 Tone

100 Kg

MINUS

GROSS

TULIP MASSTEK

The scale digitizer has four screws in four corners which attach the upper body to lower body . Two of these screws are headless and have a hole at the tip . These two headless screws are fixed diagonally opposite to each other. Through the hole of screw , the seal wire can pass through and the seal can be plugged and stamped. Before stampingto close the body a nut is tightened and this can not come out till the seal is broken . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 100 tonne with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value 5g or above and with 'e' value of 1 × 10 , 2x10 or 5-10 %, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM - 21 (278 ) 2008

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1271 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

नई दिल्ली , । फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 654.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स हाइवा डिगी वेइंग सिस्टम , 1577-19/2 , 5वां ' ए ' क्रास , बीएसके फर्स्ट स्टेज , 2 ब्लाक , मैसूर बैंक कालोनी , बंगलौर -560050 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एचडीकेएल " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " हाइवा डिगी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 08 /610 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें मास ( ( कि.ग्रा. ) को वोल्यूम ( लिटर ) में सुविधा है और लिक्विड मापन को कि.ग्रा. से लिटर में बदलने का प्रोगाम भी है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

ExtraOption

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए इंडीकेटर के बायीं तरफ अपर कवर और तल प्लेट में काट कर दो छेदों में से लीडिड सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर कसा गया है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़‌छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा.से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10* , 2× 10 % और 5 × 10 % , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 242 )/ 2008 ] आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 688Gl /10-3 PART 11 SEC. 3 (ii) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 / PHALGUNA 15. 1931

1272

New Delhi , the 1st February, 2010

S.O. 654. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Plateform Type ) with digital indication of "HDKL " series of medium accuracy ( Accuracy Class - III ) and with brand name "HIWA DIGI " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Hiwa Digi Weighing Systems , 1577-19/2 , 5th ' A ' Cross , BSK 1st stage , 2nd Block , Mysore Bank Colony, Bangalore - 560050 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /08 /610 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Plateform Type ) with amaximum capacity of 300kg and minimum capacity of 1kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 50g . It has a facility to convert mass (kg) into volume ( litre ) programmed for liquid measurement for kg to litre conversion . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

ExtraOption

Figure- 2 Sealing diagram

From the left side of the weighing scale two holes are made by cutting the upper cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The balance can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 5000kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 or 5x10" , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 242 )/20081

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 (ii)]

1273 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 6 , 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

नई दिल्ली, 2 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 655.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स पल्सर टेकनोलोजी ( इंडिया ) प्रा.लि. , 147/जी , 10वां मैन , तीसरा ब्लाक , कोरामंगला , बंगलौर-560034 द्वारा विनिर्मित " एएफएम -४सी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित " डिजीटल टैक्सी/ आटो फेयर मीटर " के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " पल्सर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 08 /500 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है;

उक्त मॉडल " डिजीटल टैक्सी/ आटो फेयर मीटर " मापन उपकरण है जो लगातार योग करता जाता है और यात्री द्वारा देय भाड़े को यात्रा के दौरान किसी भी समय दर्शाता है । सार्वजनिक वाहन के यात्रियों द्वारा देय भाड़ा , तय की गई दूरी और निर्धारित स्पीड से कम पर व्यतीत किए गए समय का फलन है जो प्राधिकृत शुल्क के अनुसार अनुपूरक भाड़े से स्वतंत्र है । मीटर की रीडिंग प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) द्वारा दर्शायी जाती है । टैक्सी मीटर का ' के' फेक्टर 2640 प्लसेस प्रति किलामीटर पर चलता है ।

FOR HIRE

PULSAR ELECTRONIC FARE METER

Pulsar Technologies ( 1 ) Pvt. Ltd. Bangalore Ph . 2552 9101

आकृति-2 उपकरण के मॉडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान

कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार को रोकने के लिए आटो/टैक्सी फेयर मीटर के पीछे बेस प्लेट पर सीलिंग वायर से सीलिंग की गई है । सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना किराया मीटर खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल की सीलिंग व्यवस्था का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 163 )/2008|

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART 11 SEC. 3 ( ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 /PHALGUNA 15, 1931

1274

New Delhi, the 2nd February , 2010

S.O. 655. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval ofthe model of " Digital Taxi /Auto Fare Meter " with digital indication ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) of " AFM - 8C " series with brand name " PULSAR" manufacturedby M/ s . Pulsar Technologies ( India ) Private Limited, 147/G, 10th Main , 3rd Block , Koramangala , Bangalore- 560034 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/08/500 ;

The said model of " Digital Taxi /Auto Fare Meter " is a measuring instrument which totalizes continuously and indicate the fare , at any moment of journey, the charges payable by the passengerssenger of a public vehicle as function of the distance travelled , and below a certain speed on the length of the time taken; this being independent of supplementary charges according to the authorized tariffs . The reading of the meter is indicated by Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) . The" K` factor ofthe auto meter is 2640 pulses per kilometer .

FOR HIBE

ADE IN INDIA

PULSAR ELECTRONIC FARE METER

Mfd By Pulsar Technologies ( 1 ) Pvt. Ltd Bhogalore PL 2552 9101

Figure- 2 Sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done by affixing the sealing wire on the base plate of the rear side of the Auto / Taxi Fare Meter to avoid fraudulent use . The fare meter cannot be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 163 )/20081

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1275 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

नई दिल्ली, 2 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 656.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी मेजरमेंट एंड प्रॉडक्ट सेफ्टी सर्विस , उपभोक्ता मामले मंत्रालय, न्यूजीलैंड द्वारा जारी मॉडल अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र के साथ उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स एटरेक्स ग्रुप एन जैड लि. , 390 ए , चर्च स्ट्रीट, ऑकलैंड , न्यूजीलैंड द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) के " एबीएस 950/960 " श्रृंखला के अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( डिजीटल वेमेंट इंडीकेटर ) अंकक सूचन सहित , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एटीआरएएक्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स एसके वेइंग सिस्टम , यूजी 22 , विश्व सदन , जनकपुरी , नई दिल्ली. 110058 द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 08 / 71 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( डिजीटल वेमेंट इंडीकेटर ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । अधिकतम 3000 सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल सहित सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसके साथ एलसीडी डिस्पले आपरेटर का पैनल है जो भार , वे एकुमुलेटर और बैग काउंट दर्शाता है तथा एक पैसेंजर एलईडी डिस्पले है वह भी भार , वे एकुमुलेटर और बैग काउंट दर्शाता है । मॉडल भार को दर्शाता है जो एयरपोर्ट पर चैक इन काउंटर , बैगेज वेइंग के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है ।

आकृति-2 सीलिंग प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

कैलिब्रेसन और सैट अप स्विच पीछे की ओर तथा डिस्प्ले हाउसिंग के तल में बायीं ओर लगाए गए हैं । एक अनुमोदित किस्म की सील पर समाप्त होने वाले अथवा एक स्नेहक विनष्ट किए जा सकने वाली अनुमोदित किस्म की सील पर वायर का प्रयोग करके आगमन को रोका जाता है । सत्यापन के लिए इन सीलों को लगाया जाता है और इन सीलों के बिना उपकरण अनस्टैम्पड होता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 301 )/2007 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 1276

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

New Delhi , the 2nd February , 2010

S.O. 656. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority along with the Model approval certificate issued by the Measurement and Product Safety Service , Ministry of Consumer Affairs , New Zealand is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights andMeasures ( Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Digital Weighment Indicator ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy Class - III ) of series "ABS 950/960" and with brand name " ATRAX " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/ s . Atrax Group NZ Ltd. , 390A , Church Street , Auckland, New Zealand and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/ s . Eskay Weighing Systems , UG 22 , Vishwa Sadan , Janakpuri , New Delhi - 110058 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/ 71 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Digital Weighment Indicator ) with maximum capacity upto 300kg . and minimum capacity 2kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g . with a maximum of 3000 verification scale intervals . It consists of an operator's panel with an LCD Display which shows weight, weigh accumulator and bag count , and a passenger LED Display which also shows weight , weigh accumulator and bag count . The model is a weighing indicator designed for airport check in - counter , baggage weighing.

The calibration and set up dip switch is located at the back and to the bottom of the left of the display housing . Access is inhibited using a wire terminating in an approved type seal, or an adhesive destructible approved type seal . These seals take the mark of verification and the removal of these seals deems the instrument unstamped. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with a maximum counts n 3000 verification scale intervals manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 301 )/20071

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director ofLega ! Metrology [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

1277

नई दिल्ली, 2 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 657, केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माष मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स नीतिराज इंजीनियर्स प्रा. लि. , 306 -ए, भाभा बिल्डिंग , एन.एम. जोशी मार्ग , डेलीसल रोड , मुंबई -40001 । ( महाराष्ट्र ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " पीबीवाई " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( बेबी वेइंग मशीन ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम "फोनिक्स" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/342 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( बेबी वेइंग मशीन ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्केल को सील करने के लिए बाटम प्लेट और टॉप कवर में छेद करके , इन दोनों छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है । स्टाम्पिंग के लिए स्केल की बाडी में से लीड सील के साथ सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को जोड़ा जाता है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का स्कीमवार डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्गप्र. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 और 5× 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 270 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [PART 11 SEC 3 ( ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6, 2010 / PHALGUNA 15, 1931

1278

New Delhi , the 2nd February , 2010

S.O. 657. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument(Baby Weighing Machine ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy Class - III ) of series " PBY " and with brand name " PHOENIX" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Nitiraj Engineers Pvt . Ltd. , Regd. Office: 306 A, Bhabha Bldg. , N. M. Joshi Marg , Delisle Road, Mumbai -400011 ( MS ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08 /342;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Baby Weighing Machine) with a maximum capacity of 30kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . Liquid Crystol Diode Display ( LED ) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on Batteries .

Figure-2--Sealing diagram of the sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done through the hole , made in the bottom plate and top cover of the scale , and then sieaing wire is passed through these two holes . Stamping plate is connected through sealing wire passing from the body of the scale with lead seal , to get the stamping. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act . the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x 10 , 2x10 or 5x10 ", where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 270 )/ 2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 100 [ भाग । - खण्ड 3(ii) ] ΗΙ

1279

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6 , 2010 /फाल्गुन 15 , 1931 до ант

नई दिल्ली , 2 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 658.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स नीतिराज इंजीनियर्स प्रा. लि. , 306 - ए, भाभा बिल्डिंग , एन.एम. जोशी मार्ग , डेलीसल रोड , मुंबई-400011 ( महाराष्ट्र ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " पीबीएमआई " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक सिक्का परिचालित व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन टिकट मुद्रण सुविधा के साथ या उसके बिना और " बीएमआई " सुविधा ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम "फोनिक्स' है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 08/ 343 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक सिक्का परिचालित व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन- टिकट मुद्रण सुविधा के साथ या उसके बिना और " बीएमआई " सुविधा ) है जिसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । 0.5 सें.मी. अंतराल के साथ हाइट मेजरिंग रेज 50 सें.मी. से 200 सें.मी. है । वेट और हाइट के साथ- साथ सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 0.1 कि.ग्रा. और 0.5 सें.मी. है । इसको सिक्के ( कोआइन ) से भी परिचालित (आप्शनल ) किया जा सकता है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है otle shot Hov 005 по голльдо тетр मॉडल को सीलिंग करने के प्रावधान का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण के इंडीकेटर के शीर्ष कवर को आंतरिक स्टड वेल्ड में छेद करके, इन स्टड में से सील वायर निकाल कर लीड सील लगाई जाती है । सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना उपकरण को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम दिया गया है । vodamozai Inbom sirtuinilevom loseto mengaib simmerle to Alacarti ammynus:

121 और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 100 कि.ग्रा. से 200 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 * और 5 × 10 *, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं । bsuratunam nosd sad lobten beverage bise sit datfor

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 270 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 688 GI/10-4 [PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 /PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

1280

New Delhi , the 2nd February, 2010

S.O. 658. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferredby sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Coin operated Person Weighing Machine- with or without ticket printing and " BMI " facility) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy Class - III ) of series " PBMI " and with brand name "PHOENIX" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M /s . Nitiraj Engineers Pvt. Ltd. , Regd . Office : 306 A , Bhabha Bldg . , N. M. Joshi Marg , Delisle Road, Mumbai - 400011 ( MS ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/343 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Coin operated Person Weighing Machine-with or without ticket printing and " BMI " facility) with a maximum capacity of 200kg and minimum capacity of 2kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g. Heights measuring range 50 cms to 200 cms with interval of 0.5 cm . The verification scale interval (e) is 0.1kg and 0.5cm for the weight and height respectively . It can be operated with Coin also (Optional ). Light Emitting Diode Display ( LED) display indicates the weighing results. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure- 2-Sealing diagram ofthe sealing provision ofthe model

Sealing can be done by making holes in the studs welded inside the top cover of the indicator of the instrument , then a seal wire is passed through these studs and a lead seal is appplied. The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 100kg to 200kg with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with 'e' value of 1x 10k, 2x10 or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (270)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1281 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

नई दिल्ली, 3 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 659.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोगे की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स ए एंड डी कंपनी लिमिटेड , 3-23-14 हिगांशी- इकेबुकुरो , तोशिमा- कु , टोक्यो -170 0013 जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले " जीएक्स- के " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के माडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम "ए एन डी कंपनी लिमिटिड" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स ए एंड डी इंस्ट मेंटस इंडिया (प्रा. ) लि. , रेक्टएंगल । , डी-4 , डिस्ट्रिक्ट सेंटर , साकेत, नई दिल्ली -110017 द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 08 /483 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ;

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो - मेगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पनसेशन प्रिंसीपल का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है जिसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 12 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 10 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल 0.1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

ήτανκαλή κατανόησ आकृति -2 मॉडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान ms wild be منالتخ उपकरण में बनाए गए छेदों में से वायर और मेटल निकाल कर मेटल के साथ स्टाम्प लगा कर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना इंडीकेटर को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 या अधिक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की alle अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 और 5 ×10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 138 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1282

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/ PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[PART 11---SEC . 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 3rd February , 2010

S.O. 659. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy Class - 1 ) of series "GX - K " and with brand name " AND Company Limited " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . A & D Company Limited , 3-23-14, Higashi- Ikebukuro , Toshima- ku , Tokyo- 170 0013 Japan and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M / s . A & D Instruments India ( P. ) Ltd. , Rectangle 1 , D - 4 , District Centre , Saket , New Delhi - 110017 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09 /08 /483 ;

The said model is an electro magnetic force compensation principle based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 12kg . and minimum capacity of 10g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 0.1g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure- 2- Schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model

Sealing is done by the wire and metal through the holes made in the instrument and sealed by the metal with stamp. The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model isgiven above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 50,000 or above for ' e ' value of Img . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufacturedby the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 138 )/ 2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1283

ROSSAD BHY

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931AK

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 3 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 660. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स ए एंड डी कंपनी लिमिटेड, 3-23-14 हिगाशी- इकेबुकुरो , तोशिमा- कु , टोक्यो-170 0013 जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग । ) वाले " जीएच " श्रृंखलों के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम "ए एन डी कंपनी लिमिटिड " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स ए एंड डी इंस्टू मेंटस इंडिया ( प्रा. ) लि. , रेक्टएंग्ल । , डी-4 , डिस्ट्रिक्ट सेंटर, साकेत , नई दिल्ली-110017 द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/08 / 484 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो- मेगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पनसेशन प्रिंसीपल का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । जिसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है अधि. ≤ 320 ग्रा. और सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल एन≤ 320000≥ ई ग्रा. तथा मापमान अंतराल डी 1/10 ई या डी = 1/100 ई है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान

उपकरण में बनाए गए छेदों में से वायर और मेटल निकाल कर मेटल के साथ स्टाम्प लगा कर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना इंडीकेटर को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित, उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " मान के लिए 50,000 या अधिक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 और 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं।त

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 138 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1284

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 /PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[PART 11 SEC . 3 (ii ) ]

NewDelhi , the 3rd February , 2010

S.O. 660. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of special accuracy ( Accuracy Class - 1 ) of series " GHH " and with brand name "ANDCompany Limited" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/ s . A & D Company Limited, 3-23-14, Higashi- Ikebukuro , Toshima -ku , Tokyo - 170 0013 Japan and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M / s . A & D Instruments India (P) Ltd. , Rectangle 1 , D - 4 , District Centre , Saket , New Delhi - 110017 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /08 /484 ;

The said model is an electro magnetic force compensation principle based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 50g Max 320g in respect of verification scale interval n 320000 for e Ig and scale interval de ord 1/10 e ord 100 e . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure-2-Schematic diagram of the sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done by the wire and metal through the holes made in the instrument and sealed by the metal with stamp . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model isgiven above .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 50,000 or above for e ' value of Img . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10 %, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 138 )/2008 |

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1285

भारत का राजपत्र मार्च 6 , 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 3 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 661. केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स ए एंड डी कंपनी लिमिटेड 3-23-14 हिगाशी-इकेबुकुरो, तोशिमा - कू, टोक्यो-1700013 जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले " एचआर " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ए एन डी कंपनी लिमिटेड" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स ए एंड डी इंस्ट्रूमेंटस इंडिया प्रा.लि. ) रेक्टएंग्ल । , डी -4 डिस्ट्रिक्ट सेंटर , साकेत , नई दिल्ली -110017 द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /08/ 485 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है । उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो - मैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पेनसेशन प्रिंसीपल का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता < 210 ग्रा. है और सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल एन 210000 ई । ग्रा. तथा मापमान अंतराल डी ई या ई 10 डी है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । suong sat to mis आकृति 2 माडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान

उपकरण में बनाए गए छेदों में से वायर और मेटल निकाल कर मेटल के साथ स्टाम्प लगा कर सीलिंग की जा सकती है । सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना इंडीकेटर को खोला नहीं जा सकता। मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

or और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 या अधिक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 के और 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (138 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1286

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[ PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 3rd February, 2010

S.O. 661. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy Class - I ) of series " HR" and with brand name " AND Company Limited" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . A & D Company Limited, 3-23-14, Higashi- Ikebukuro , Toshima - ku , Tokyo - 1700013 , Japan and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/ s . A & D Instruments India ( P) Ltd. , Rectangle 1 , D - 4 District Centre , Saket , New Delhi - 110017 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /08/485 ;

The said model is an electro magnetic force compensation principle based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of Max < 210g in respect of verification scale interval n < 210000 fore > 1g . and scale interval e= d or e = 10d . It has tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Crystal Diode ( LCD) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 V , 50 Hz alternative current power supply .

Figure-2-Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done by the wire and metal through the holes made in the instrument and sealed by the metal with stamp. The Indicator can not be operend without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 50,000 or above for ' e ' value of 1 mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x10 or 5x10 , where kis a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM -21 ( 138 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 1287 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6 , 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 3 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 662.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स ए एंड डी कंपनी लिमिटेड 3-23-14 हिगाशी- इकेबुकुरो , तोशिमा- कु , टोक्यो-1700013 जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " जीपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन संहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम "ए एन डी कंपनी लिमिटेड" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स ए एंड डी इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स इंडिया ( प्रा. ) लि. रेक्टएंग्ल । , डी-4 डिस्ट्रिक्ट सेंटर , साकेत, नई दिल्ली -110017 द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 /08 / 486 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो- मैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पेनसेशन प्रिंसीपल का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 61 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) । ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 माडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5,000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 और 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 138 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 688GI /10-5 1288

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 6 , 2010 / PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[PART 11 SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

NewDelhi , the 3rd February, 2010

S.O. 662. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with digital indication of high accuracy ( Accuracy Class - II ) of series " GP " and with brand name "AND Company Limited" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M / s . A & D Company Limited, 3-23-14 , Higashi- Ikebukuro , Toshima - ku , Tokyo - 170 0013 , Japan and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M / s . A & D Instruments India (P) Ltd. , Rectangel 1 , D- 4 District Centre, Saket , New Delhi - 110017 and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/08/486;

The said model is an electro magnetic force compensation principle based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 61 kg and minimum capacity of 50g . The verification scale interval ( c) is Ig . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD ) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 V, 50 Htz alternative current power supply .

Figure - 2-Sealing Diagram

Sealing is done by the wire and metal through the holes made in the instrument and sealed by the metal with stamp. The Indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model is given above .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity about to 50kg. and upto 5000 kg . with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10 % or 5x10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (138 )/ 2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1289 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 3 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 663.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो- मैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पनेसेशन प्रिंसीपल का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित प्रकार का तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 210 ग्रा . है अधि. > 8100 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 ई है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल 0.01 ग्रा. < > 1 ग्रा. और डी वेल्यूई/ 10 है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप -धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 या अधिक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 और 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम 21 ( 139 )/2008|

आर. माथुरवूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1290

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 /PHALGUNA 15, 1931

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 3rd February , 2010

S.O. 663. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( sce the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy Class- 1 ) of series " GF " and with brand name " AND Company Limited " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M / s . A & D Company Limited , 3-23-14, Higashi- Ikebukuro , Toshima - ku , Tokyo - 170 0013 , Japan and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M / s. A & D Instruments India (P) Ltd. , Rectangel 1, D- 4 District Centre , Saket , New Delhi - 110017 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/08/487;

The said model is an Electro Magnetic Force Compensation Principle based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity 210g ≤ Max ≤ 8100g and minimum capacity 20e. The verification scale interval 0.01g≤e≤ 1g and ' d ' value is e/10 . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode (LCD ) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 V, 50 Hz alternative current power supply .

000

Figure-2- Sealing Diagram

Sealing is done by the wire and metal through the holes made in the instrument and sealed by the metal with stamp . The Indicator cannot be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 50,000 or above for ' e ' value of Img or more and with ' e' value of 1x 10 % , 2x10 or 5 × 10 % , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 139)/2008 |

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology [भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1291 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 6 , 2010/फाल्गुन 15; 1931

नई दिल्ली , 3 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 664.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स ए एंड डी कंपनी लिमिटेड 3-23-14 हिगाशी- इकेबुकुरो , तोशिमा कु. टोक्यो-170 0013 जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले " जीआर " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम "ए एन डी कंपनी लिमिटेड" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स ए एंड डी इंस्ट्रूमेटस इंडिया ( प्रा. ) लि. रेक्टएंग्ल । , डी-4 डिस्ट्रिक्ट सेंटर साकेत , नई दिल्ली -110017 द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/ 488 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है । उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो - मैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पनेसेशन प्रिंसीपल का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित प्रकार तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 120 ग्रा. है अधि. > 300 ग्रा. और सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल एन < 300000 ई ≥1 ग्रा. तथा मापमान अंतराल ई = डी या ई = 10 डी या ई = 100 डी है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा. इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 या अधिक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 और 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 139 )/2008 |

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1292

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6, 2010/PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[PART 11 SEC. 3 ( ii) |

New Delhi , the 3rd February , 2010

S.O. 664. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, issatisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy Class - 1 ) of series " GR" and with brand name " AND Company Limited" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . A & D CompanyLimited, 3-23-14 , Higashi- Ikebukuro , Toshima - ku , Tokyo - 170 0013 , Japan and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M / s . A & D Instruments India ( P) Ltd. , Rectangel 1, D- 4 District Centre , Saket , New Delhi - 110017 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08 /488 ;

The said model is an Electro Magnetic Force Compensation Principle based non - automatic weighing instrument with amaximum capacity of 120g ≤ Max ≤ 300g in respect of verification scale interval n ≤ 300000 for e≥ 1g and scale interval e = dore 10 dor e 100 d. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 V, 50 Hz alternative current power supply.

Figure-2 Schematict diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done by the wire and inetal through the holes made in the instrument and sealed by the metal with stamp . The Indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 50,000 or above for ' e ' value of Img or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM -21 (139 ) / 2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1293

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

नई दिल्ली, 3 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 665.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स ए एंड डी कंपनी लिमिटेड 3-23-14 हिगाशी-इकेबुकुरो , तोशिमा- कु, टोक्यो-170 0013 जापान द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " ई के " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम "ए एन डी कम्पनी लिमिटेड" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स ए एंड डी इंस्ट्रूमेंट्स इंडिया ( प्रा. ) लि. रेक्टएंग्ल । , डी-4 डिस्ट्रिक्ट सेंटर साकेत , नई दिल्ली -110017 द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 08/ 489 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो मैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पनेसेशन प्रिंसीपल पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 ग्रा . है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 10 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

AND FR-1000

आकृति-2 माडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 और 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम 21 ( 139 )/2008|

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 1294

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/PHALGUNA 15, 1931

New Delhi , the 3rd February , 2010

S.O. 665. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy Class - II ) of series " EK " and with brand name "AND Company Limited " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/s . A & D Company Limited, 3-23-14, Higashi- Ikebukuro , Toshima - ku , Tokyo - 170 0013 , Japan and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M / s. A & D Instruments India (P ) Ltd. , Rectangel 1 , D- 4 District Centre , Saket , New Delhi - 110017 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 08 /489 ;

The said model is an Electro Magnetie Forec Compensation Principle based non - automatic weighing instrument with amaximum capacity of 300g . and minimum capacity of 200mg . The verification scale interval ' e ' is 10mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtrative retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD ) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 V , 50 Hz alternative current power supply .

AND EK-3001

Figure- 2 Schematice diagram of sealing provision of the model

Scaling is done by the wire and metal through the holes made in the instrument and sealed by the metal with stamp. The Indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act. the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e' value of Img , to 50mg . and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of5000 to 50,000 for' e value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10. 2 × 10 or 5 ×10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 139 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 1295 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली , 17 फरवरी , 2010

का.. 666. - भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) नियम , 1988 के नियम 4 के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचितं करता है कि जिनके विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं को लाइसेंस प्रदान किए गए हैं :-

अनुसूची

वर्ष

भाग खण्ड

उत्पाद

भामा वर्ष

पार्टी का नाम एवं पता (कारखाना)

लाइसेंस संख्या

क्रम संख्या

लाइसेंस मंजूरी तिथि

(8) (9 )

(7)

(6)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

1997

IS 3854

घरेलू और समान

21-05-2009

7944903

1 .

प्रयोजनों के लिए

स्विच

केलनेर इलेक्ट्रीकल्स प्रा. लि. 107-108 , टोपाझा इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , सातीवली मेन रोड , विलेज वालीव , थाने वसई पूर्व महाराष्ट्रा-401208

1980

बिजली के घरेलू खादय IS 4250

10-06-2009

7949206

मिक्सर ( द्रवीपरक और ग्राइन्डर )

राजेंद्र होम अप्लाएंसेस ग्राउंड फलोअर , रूम सं. 3 , मारवाडी चाल , 13 /सी , आर बी मार्ग , डी पी वाडी, घोडपदेव , महाराष्ट्र-400 033

2005

250 वोल्टता और रेटित IS 1293

01-06-2009

7946604

धारित 16 एम्पीयर्स तक के प्लग और सॉकेट आउटलेटस

केलनेर इलेक्ट्रीकल्स प्रा. लि. , 107-108 , टोपाझा इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , सातीवली मेन रोड , विलेज वालीव , थाने वसई पूर्व महाराष्ट्र-401208

वायुमंडल IS2148

विस्फोटक गैस 2004 03-05-2009

7940285

के लिए बिजली के उप-

स्कर ज्वालासह आवरण डी

मॅको प्नुमॅटिक्स प्रा. लि. , प्लॉट सं. 133-134 , वसई म्युनसिपल इंडस्ट्रियल एरिआ, डमेला फाटा, पापडी, थाने , वसई पश्चिम महाराष्ट्र-401 207

1997

IS 3854

21-05-2009

7944701

घरेलू और समान प्रयोजनों के लिए स्विच

श्री इंडस्ट्रिज , 207 , दूसरा माला, आशिर्वाद इंडस्ट्रयल इस्टेट , राम मंदीर रोड , गोरेगाँव पश्चिम महाराष्ट्र-400 104

1988 02-04-2009

7926594

1100 वोल्टता तक कार्यकारी IS 1554 वोल्टता के लिए पी वी सी रोधित ( हैवीडयूटी)

विदयुत केबल

विशाल केबल्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड , प्लॉट सं इ-41 , अॅडिशनल अंबरनाथ , एम आय डी सी , आनंदनगर, थाने , अंबरनाथ-421 506

1980

IS 4250

बिजली के घरेलू खाद्य

21-05-2009

7944495

मिक्सर ( द्रवीपरक और

ग्राइन्डर )

टॉप मिक्स इंडस्ट्रिज, गला से 7 और 8 , स्काय इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , ओल्ड दाल मिल , एन एच 8 , स्नेह पेट्रोल पंप के पास , थाने , वसई पूर्व महाराष्ट्र-401 208

688 GI / 106 1296

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 6 , 2010/PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

(1) (2)

(3)

(4) 8. 7951694 25-06-2009 नवभारत मोटर मैन्यूफैक्चरिंग कम्पनी , 204/303 , कपाडिया इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट सं. 3 , अंधेरी कुर्ला रोड, चकाला , अंधेरी पूर्व , मुंबई -400 093 9. 7924388 02-04-2009 विमा केबल इंडस्ट्रिज , सी-15, सिंघ इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, राम मंदिर रोड, गोरेगाँव परिश्चम, मुंबई-400 104 10. 7952191 25-06-2009 पॉलिटेक्स केबल्स युनिट सं. 9 , शुक्ला कंपाउंड , दत्त मंदिर के पास , अपोजिट गैस गोडाउन , थाने दहिसर, मुंबई -400 068 11. 7925491 02-04-2009 निओलेक्स केबल्स 28 और 29 सदगुरु नानक इस्टेट , वेस्टर्न एक्सप्रेस हाइवे , गोरेगाँव पूर्व , मुंबई -400 063 12. 7957811 20-07-2009 निओलेक्स केबल्स 28 और 29 सदगुरू नानक इस्टेट , वेस्टर्न एक्सप्रेस हाइवे, गोरेगाँव पूर्व मुंबई -400 063 13. 7944394 21-05-2010 मॉडर्न प्राडक्टस , गाला सं. 19 , केसकाका कंपाउंड, आय बी पटेल रोड, गोरेगॉव पूर्व, मुंबई-400 063 14. 7946503 01-06-2009 श्री इंडस्ट्रिज , 207 , दुसरा माला आशिर्वाद इंडसिट्रयल इस्टेट , राम मंदीर रोड, गोरेगाँव पश्चिम महाराष्ट्र-400 104 15. 7948406 07-06-2009 पॉलिनेम्स केबल्स यूनिट सं. 9 , शुक्ला कंपाउंड, दत्त मंदिर के पास , अपोजिट गैस गोडाउन , थाने दहिसर , मुंबई-400 068 16. 7949307 10-06-2009 पवन अप्लाएंसेस , गोडाउन सं. 9. के वी कंपाउंड टी जे रोड, अपोजिट स्वॅन मिल , सिवरी मुंबई-400 015

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] (5)

(6) (7) (8) ( 9)

2004 विस्फोटक गैस वायुमंडल IS 2148 के लिए बिजली को उपस्कर-ज्वालासह आवरण डी

Part 1

1988 क्रासलिंक्डपॉलीइथिलीन IS 7098 विदयुतरोधी पीवीसी आवरित केबल्स (भाग 1 ) 1100 वो तक कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए

1990 1100 वो तक एवं सहित IS 694 कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए पी वी सी रोधित केबल

1984 इलेक्ट्रॉनिक टाइप फैन IS 11037 रेग्युलेटर

2005 250 वोल्टता और रेटित IS 1293 धारित 16 एम्पीयर्स तक के प्लग और सॉकेट आउटलेटस

1988 1100 वो तक कार्यकारी IS 1554 वोल्टता के लिए पीवी सी रोधित ( हैवीडयूटी) विदयुत केबल

1988 बिजली के घरेलू खादय IS4250 मिक्सर ( द्रवीपरक और ग्राइन्डर) 1297 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

( 5)

(7) ( 8) ( 9 ) (2)

(3)

(4)

(6)

(1)

21-05-2009

क्रासलिंक्ड पॉलीइथिलीन IS 7098 Part- 1

17. 7944802

1988

वि‌द्युतरोधी पीवीसी आवरित केबल्स (भाग 1 ) 1100 वो. तक कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए

तिरूपती बालाजी एंड कंपनी बी-2005 , सरस्वती अपार्टमेंट , सहकार ग्राम , अशोक नगर , क्रॉस रोड सं. 3 , कांदीवली पूर्व, मुंबई -400 101

18. 7945602 25-05-2009

1990

1100 वो. तक एवं सहित IS 694 कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए पी वी सी रोधित केबल

विकास केबल्स , सर्वे सं. 112/2 , एस्सार पेट्रोल पंप के पीछे, कल्याण मुरबाड रोड , कांबा गाँव थाने , कल्याण तालुका , महाराष्ट्र-421 301

1984 19-04-2009

19. 7930989

इलेक्ट्रॉनिक टाइप फैन IS 11037

22/23 , शुभ बिल्डिंग , सागर मंथन रेग्युलेटर गोल्डमेडल इलेक्ट्रीकल्स प्रा. लि. , इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , भोईदापाडा, सातिवली , थाने , वसई पूर्व मुंबई-401 208

20. 7949610 11-06-2009

शिरोपरि प्रेषण प्रयोजनों IS 398 Part - 1 1996

केलिए एल्युमिनियम

चालक भाग ।

एल्यूमिनियम स्टरैडिड

चालक

जे एस के इंडस्ट्रिज प्राइवेट लि. , सर्वे सं. 369/1/1/2 , विलेज सायली , सियाराम सिल्क के पिछे , दादरा नगर हवेली , सिल्वासा, दादरा नगर हवेली-396 230

1990 09-07-2009

21 . 7954195

1100 वो. तक एवं सहित IS 694 कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए पी वी सी रोधित केबल

माथा केबल्स इंडिया , गाला 17/41 , निर्मल आशिश इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , थाने , आसनगाँव पश्चिम , थाने-421 601

22. 7953597 06-07-2009

घरेलूऔर समान निश्चित IS 14772 2000

विदयुत संस्थापनों के लिए

उपकरणों हेतु अनुलग्नकों

की सामान्य अपेक्षाएं

मैट्रिक्स इलेक्ट्रिकल्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड , 20 तीर्थकर कंपाउंड , गोगटे वाडी, मिस्टर पांडे मिश्रा चाल , ऑफ आरे रोड, गोरेगाँव पूर्वमुम्बई -400 063

21-07-2009

1100 वो. तक एवं सहित IS 694 1990 23. 7958308

कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए

पी वी सी रोधित केबल

पॉवर कॅब इंडस्ट्रीज 9 , मोनिका इंडस्ट्रियल कॉम्प्लेक्स , अपोजिट खेमानी स्कूल , थाने , उल्हासनगर , महाराष्ट्र -421002

24. 7957912 21-07-2009

1100 वो. तक कार्यकारी IS 1554 Part - 1 1988

वोल्टता के लिए पी वी सी रोधित ( हैवीड्यूटी ) विदयुत केबल

निओलेक्स केबल्स 29, सदगुरू नानक इस्टेट , वेस्टर्न एक्सप्रेस हाइवे , गोरेगाँव पूर्व, मुम्बई-400 063

25. 7958005 22-07-2009

घरेलू और समान IS 3854 1997 प्रयोजनों के लिए स्विच

भूमि इलेक्ट्रिकल्स, 136 , पारस इंडस्ट्रीयल इस्टेट , रामचंद्र लेन एक्सटेंशन , कांचपाडा, मलाड पश्चिम, मुम्बई-400 064

[सं. केप्रवि/ 13 : 1

सी. के. महेश्वरी , वैज्ञानिक जी ( प्रमाणन ) 1298

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/ PHALGUNA 15, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

New Delhi , the 17th February, 2010

S.O. 666.-- In pursuance ofsub - regulation ( 5) of the regulation (4) of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification ) Regulations 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licenses particulars of which are given inthe following schedule:

SCHEDULE

Licence Grant Date

ISNo. Part Sec Year Sl . No. No.

Title ofthe standards

Name and Address ofthe party

(2)

(1)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6) (7)

(9)

(8) 1. 7944903 21-05-2009

IS3854

1997

Switches for domestic and similar purposes

Kellner Electricals Pvt . Ltd. , 107-108 , Topaz Indl . Estate , Sativali Main Road , Vill Waliv, Thane , Vasai - E- Maharashtra 401208

2 7949206 10-06-2009

IS4250

1980

Specification for Domestic Electric Food-Mixers ( Liqui- dizes and Grinders )

Rajendra Home Appliances Ground Floor , Room No. 3 , Marvadi Chawl , 13 / C , R. B. Marg, D. P. Wadi , Ghodap- deo , Maharashtra - 400 033

7946604

01-06-2009

IS 1293

2005

Plugs and socket outlets of 250 volts and rated current up to 16 amperes

Kellner Electricals Pvt . Ltd. , 107-108 , Topaz Indl . Estate , Sativali Main Road , Vill Waliv, Thane , Vasai - E- Maharashtra-401 208

4. 7940285 03-05-2009

IS2148

2004

Flame proofen- closures for elec- trical apparatus

Micro Pneumatics Pvt . Ltd. , Plot No. 133-134 , Vasai Municipal Indl . Area , Umela Phata , Papdy, Thane , Vasai - W- Maharashtra-401207

5. 7944701 21-05-2009

IS3854

1997

Switches for do- mestic and similar purposes

Shree Industries 207 , 2nd Floor, Ashirwad Industrial Estate No. 3, Ram Mandir Road , Goregaon(West ) Maharashtra-400104

6. 7926594 02-04-2009

IS 1554 Part - 1

1988 Vishal Cables Pvt . Ltd. , PlotNo. E -41 , Additional Ambernath , MIDC , Anandnagar , Thane Ambernath , Maharashtra - 421506

PVC insulated (heavy duty) electric cables: Part 1 For working voltages upto and including 1100 V

7 . 7944495 21-05-2009

IS4250

1980

Specification for Domestic Electric Food-Mixers ( Liqui- dizes and Grinders )

Top Mix Industries Gala No. 7 & 8 , Sky Industrial Estate ( Old Dall Mill ) NH 8 , Near Sneh Petrol Pump , Thane , Vasai ( East) Maharashtra- 401208 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च6, 2010 /फाल्गुन 15, 1931

(2)

(1)

(3)

(4)

25-06-2009

8. 7951694

1299 (5)

(6) (7) (8) (9) IS2148

2004

Flameproofen-

closures for elec-

trical apparatus

NavbharatMotor Mfg . Co. 204/303 , Kapadia Indl . Estate No. 3 , Andheri Kurlaroad , Chakala , Andheri ( E) Maharashtra -400093 9. 7924388 02-04-2009 Vima Cable Industries C- 15 , Singh Indl . Estate, Ram Mandir Road, Goregaon ( W) Mumbai , Maharashtra -400104 10. 7952191 25-06-2009 Polytex Cables Unit No. 9, Shukla Com- pound , NR Datta Mandir, Opp:GasGodown Thane , Dahisar Maharashtra -400068 11. 7925491 02-04-2009 Vishal Cables Pvt . Ltd. , Plot No. E -41 , Additional Ambernath , MIDC , Anand- nagar Thane , Ambernath Maharashtra- 421506 12. 7957811 20-07-2009 Neolex Cables 28 & 29 Sadguru Nanak Estate, Westerm Express Highway Goregaon ( E) Maharashtra - 400063 13. 7944394 21-05-2010

Part - 1

IS 7098

1988

Crosslinked polyethylene insu- lated PVC sheathed cables : Part I For working voltage upto and including 1100 V

1990 IS 694

PVC Insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100 V

IS 694

1990

PVC Insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100 V

IS694

1990

PVC Insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100 V

1984 IS 11037

Electronic type fan

regulators

Modern Products Gala No. 19 , Kesakaka Compound, I.B. patel Road , Goregaon-(E) Maharashtra - 400063 14. 7946503 01-06-2009 Shree Industries 207 , 2nd Floor , Ashirwad Industrial Estate No. 3, Ram Mandir Road Goregaon (West) Maharashtra -421506 15. 7948406 07-06-2009 Polytex Cables Unit No. 9 , Shukla Com- pound , NR Datta Mandir , Opp: GasGodown , Thane , Dahisar- East Maharashtra - 400068 16. 7949307 10-06-2009 PavanAppliances Godown No. 9 , K.V. Compound, T - J Road Opp: Swan Mill , Sewree Maharashtra - 400015 IS 1293

2005

Plugs and socket outlets of 250 volts and rated current upto 16 amperes

Part - 1 1988 IS 1554

PVC Insulated (heavy duty) electric cables : Part I For working voltages upto and including 1100V

IS4250

1988

Specification for

Domestic Electric

Food-Mixers

(Liquidizesand

Grinders)

17. 7944802 21-05-2009 Tirupati Balaji and Company B/2005 , Saraswati Apt , Sahakar Gram , Ashok Nagar , X Road No. 3 Kandivali -East Maharashtra - 400101

Part - 1

IS 7098

1988

Crosslinked polyethylene insu- lated PVC sheathed cables: Part 1 For working voltages upto and including 1100 V 1300

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 /PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[ PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii )] (2)

(8) (3)

(5)

(6) (7)

(9) (4)

(1)

25-05-2009

IS694

1990 18. 7945602

PVC Insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100 V

VikasCables Survey No. 112/2 , Behind Essar Petrol Pump . Kalyan-Murbad Road, Kemba Gaon , Thane, Kalyan Taluka Maharashtra -421301

1984 19. 7930989 19-04-2009

IS 11037

Electronic type fan regulators

Goldmedal Electricals Pvt . Ltd. , 22/23 , Shubh Bldg . Sagar Manthan Indl . Estate, Bhoidapada , Sativali , Thane , Casai - E Maharashtra -401208

11-06-2009

IS 398 Part - 1

1996 20. 7949610

Aluminium conduc- tors for overhead transmission pur- poses : Part 1 aluminium stranded conductors

JSK Industries Pvt . Ltd. Survey No. 369/1/1/2 , Village: Sayli , Behind Siyaram Silk Mills Dadra and Nagar Haveli Silvassa Dada and Nagar Haveli - 396230

1990 21. 7954195 09-07-2009

IS 694

PVC Insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100 V

Matha Cables (India) Gala 17/41 , Nirmal Ashish Industrial Estate Thane, Asangaon -W Maharashtra - 421601

22. 7953597 06-07-2009

IS 14772

2000 Matrix Electricals Pvt . Ltd. 20 Tirthankar Compound Gogate Waddi , Mr. Pandey Mishra Chawl , Off Aarey Road Goregaon -E- Maharashtra -400063

GeneralRequire- ments for Enclosures for Accessories for Household and Similar Fixed Electrical Installations - Specifi- cation

IS 694

21-07-2009

1990 23. 7958308

PVC Insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100 V

Power Cab Industries 9, Monica Indl . Complex, Opp: Khemani School , Thane, Ulhasnagar , Maharashtra -421002

24. 7957912 21-07-2009

Part- 1

IS 1554

1988 Neolex Cables 29 sadguru Nanak Estate , Westerm Express Highway Goregaon(E) Maharashtra -400063

PVC Insulated (heavy duty) electric cables : Part 1 for working voltages upto and including 1100 V

IS3854

7958005 22-07-2009

1997 25

Switches for do- mestic and similar purposes

Bhoomi Electricals 136, Paras Industrial Estate , Ramchandra Lane Ext . Kanchanpada Greater Bombay Malad- W Maharashtra - 400064

[No. CMD/13: 11 ]

C. K. MAHESHWARI , Sc . " G " ( Certification) 1301

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

[ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 18 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 667.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 5 के उपविनियम ( 6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानफ ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तिथि से रद्द कर दिया गया है : -

अनुसूची

लाइसेंसधारी का नाम एवं पता लाइसेंस संख्या सीएम -एल

क्रम संख्या

7208968

ओरोस्टार इलेक्ट्रीकल्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड गाला सं । और 2 , आर जे कारमिलिन चॉल , कांती नगर , बेहराम बाग रोड , जोगेश्वरी पश्चिम , मुंबई-400102 2.

7510462

पर्ल इलेक्ट्रीकल इंडस्ट्रीज प्राइवेट लिमिटेड सर्वे सं 728/1 , जी 5 और 6 , तल माला , अविस इंडस्ट्रीयल इस्टेट , दाभेल , दमण , दमण और दीव -396210 7127463

गैलेग्झी इलेक्ट्रीकल इंडस्ट्रीज गाला सं. 33, पहला माला, सिंग इंडस्ट्रीयल इस्टेट सं 3 , राममंदीर रोड , गोरेगाँव पश्चिम , मुंबई- 400 104

7265778

इंदर इंडस्ट्रीज , 644/19 अग्रवाल इंडस्ट्रीयल इस्टेट , सोमनाथ रोड , सोमनाथ मंदिर के पीछे , दाभेल , दमण और दीव , दमण-396210

7796207

टेराकाम प्राइवेट लिमिटेड , प्लॉट सं. 250 , कुंडाइम इंडस्ट्रीयल इस्टेट , कुंडाइम, पोंडा, गोवा- 403115

रद्द करने की तिथि लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/प्रक्रम सम्बद्ध भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

07-09-2009 371 : 1999 सिलिंग रोज

13-07-2009 371 : 1999 सिलिंग रोज

07-09-2009 3854 : 1997 घरेलु और समान प्रयोजनों के लिएस्विच

09-09-2009 1258 : 2005

बेयोनेट लैम्प होल्डर्स

27-05-2009 IS 9857 : 1990 वेल्डिंग केबल

[No. CMD/ 13 : 13 ] [ सी. के. महेश्वरी , वैज्ञानिक जी ( प्रमाणन ) ]

New Delhi , the 18th Feburary , 2010

S.O. 667. In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 6) of regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification ) Regulations , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule have been cancelled with effect from the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Licence No. Name and address of the licensee Si No.

(2)

(3)

(1)

7208968

1 .

Arrowstar Electricals Pvt . Ltd. Gala No. 1 & 2, R.J. Carmilin Chawl , Kranti Nagar, Behram Baug Road, Jogeshwari (W) Mumbai -400102 Maharashtra

Date of

Cancellation Article/ Process with relevant Indian Standard covered by the licence cancelled

(5) (4)

07-09-2009 IS371 : 1999

Asper enclosure 1302

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

(2)

(1)

(3)

7510462

Pearl Electrical Industries Pvt .

Ltd. Survey No 728/1 , G 5 & 6 , Ground Floor, Avis Industrial Estate , Dabhel Damann Daman Daman & Diu - 396210 7127463

Galaxy Electrical Indus Gala No. 33 , 1 Floor Singh Indl Estate No. 3 , Rammandir Road, GreaterBombay Goregaon West Maharashtra - 400104 7265778

Inder Industries

644/19 , Agrawal Industrial Estate, Somnath Road, Opposite Somnath Temple , Dabhel Damann Daman Daman & Diu - 396210 7796207

5 .

Teracom Ltd. 250, Kundaim Industrial Estate, .. Kundaim North Goa GOA Goa-403115

[PART 11- SEC. 3 (ii) ] (4)

(5) IS 371 : 1999

13-07-2009 Asper licence file

IS 3854: 1997

07-09-2009 IS 1258 : 2005

09-09-2009 Plastic Bayonet Insulated Lampholders back plated únswitched B22 , Rating 2A 240V AC

27-05-2009 IS 9857: 1990

Single core general service

normal duty elestomeric compound with copper conductor for welding cables

[No. CMD/ 13 :13] C.K.MAHESHWARI , Sc . " G " ( Certification)

नई दिल्ली , 18 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 668.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो (प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 5 के उपविनियम (6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिनके विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं को लाइसेंस प्रदान किए गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

लाइसेंस संख्या लाइसेंस मंजूरी तिथि

क्रम संख्या

भामा वर्ष भाग खण्ड वर्ष उत्पाद

पार्टी का नाम एवं पता

(कारखाना)

(1) (2)

(3)

(4)

08-09-2010

(5)

(6)

(9)

(7) ( 8)

2005

प्रेसफिट पाइप अॅन्ड

1 .

7970702

प्रोफाइल , सर्वे सं. 127 , राज राजेश्वरी कंपाउंड मुंबई रेयॉन के पास, विलेज सोनाले, थाने, भिवंडी-421302

7978314

08-10-2010

दक्षा कंवल इंडस्ट्रीज प्रा. लि. ,

250 वोल्टता और IS 1293

एम्पीयर्स तक के

रेटित धारित 16 प्लग और सॉकेट

आउटलेटस

1990 1100 वां तक एवं IS 694

सहितकार्यकारी

वोल्टता के लिए

पी वी सी रोधित

केबल

143 ए, गव्हर्नमेंट

इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट ,

कांदीवली पश्चिम,

मुंबई-400 067

[भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 6 , 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

(2)

(1)

(4)

(3)

7970904

06-09-2010

1303 (5)

(6)

(7) (8) (9) IS 371

सिलिंग रोज

प्रेसफिट पाइप अॅन्ड प्रोफाइल , सर्वे सं. 127 , राज राजेश्वरी कंपाउंड मुंबई रेयॉन के पास , विलेज सोनाले, थाने, भिवंडी-421302

7960291

29-07-2010

मायलाइट इंडस्ट्रीज, 12 , मधुबन इंडस्ट्रीयल इस्टेट, ऑफ महाकाली रोड, अंधेरी पूर्व , मुंबई-400 093 7968816

30-08-2010

1999 IS 8828

1996 विद्युत सहायक अंग- घरेलु और ऐसे ही संस्थापनों के लिए अतिधारा संरक्षण हेतु परिपथ वियोजक

1980 IS 4250

बिजली के घरेलु

खादय मिक्सर

( द्रवीपरक और

ग्राइन्डर )

महावीर मॅन्युफैक्चरींग पहला माला , 29 एडमंड डीसोजा कंपाउंड , खैरानी रोड , साकीनाका, अंधेरी पूर्व, मुंबई-400 072

7972302

10-09-2010

1980 IS4250

बिजली के घरेलु

खादय मिक्सर

(द्रवीपरक और

ग्राइन्डर )

राज रतन अप्लाएंसेस गाला सं 15 तल माला मीठालाल कंपाउंड , शिवाजी नगर , कुमार विलेज मालाड पूर्वमुंबई 97 7.

7978415

08-10-2010

आयुष होम अप्लाएंसेस , गाला सं 4, गाजी बाडा , दरगाह लेयन गुड लक डेअरी के पीछे , हलाव पूल, कुर्ला पश्चिम, मुंबई 400 070 8.

7970803

06-09-2010

2005 IS 1293

250 वोल्टता और रेटित धारित 16 एम्पीयर्स तक के प्लग और सॉकेट आउटलेटस

1997 IS 3854

घरेलु और समान

प्रयोजनों के लिए

स्विच

प्रेसफिट पाइप अॅन्ड प्रोफाइल , सर्वे सं 127 , राज राजेश्वरी कंपाउंड , मुंबई रेयॉन के पास , विलेज सोनाले , थाने, भिवंडी-421302

7959916

28-07-2010

विशाल केबल्स प्राईवेट लिमिटेड , प्लॉट सं ई 41 , अतिरिक्त अंबरनाथ , एम आय डी सी आनंद नगर थाने , अंबरनाथ 421506

10.

26-08-2010

7967915

पॉलीकॅब वायर्स प्रा लि 78-82 सिल्वर इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , भीमपोरे, अंदमान निकोबार , दमण,अंदमान निकोबार 396210

688 Gl/10-7

1995

भाग ।

IS 14255

वायवीय गुच्छित केबल 1100 वोल्ट तक और सहित की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए

भाग 5

1992 शिरोपरी प्रेषण हेतु IS 398 अल्युमिनियम चालक भामा 5 - अतिरिक्त उच्च वोल्टता के लिए जस्तीकृत इस्पात प्रबलित चालक 1304

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 /PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) | (2)

(4)

(5)

(3)

(6)

(8) (9) (1)

(7) 7962804

11.

09-08-2010

1980

IS 4250

बिजली के घरेलु खादय मिक्सर (द्रवीपरक और ग्राइन्डर )

कांचन इंटरनेशनल सं 9/10 तल माला लिमिटेड ,युनिट ।।। प्लॉट सोमनाथ इंडस्टियल को ऑपरेटिव सो लि, सोमनाथ रोड, दमण दाभेल , दमण और दीव 396210

7982002

12.

25-10-2010

IS 2993

1998

ए सी मोटर कपॅसीटर्स

अमीत कपॅसिटर लिमिटेड प्लॉ सं 90 और 91 , पिलरने इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , नॉर्थ गोवा, बाडेंझ , गोआ-403511

7982103

25-10-2010

IS 1709

13.

1984

कपॅसिटर्स फॉर इलेक्टीक फॅन मोटर्स

अमीत कपॅसिटर लिमिटेड प्लॉ सं 90 और 91 , पिलरने इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, नॉर्थ गोवा , बाडेंझ , गोआ-403511

7959512

1997 14.

27-07-2010

IS 3854

घरेलु और समान प्रयोजनों के लिए स्विच

मॅटिक्स इलेक्ट्रीकल्स प्रा लि, गाला सं 4 , 2ए 2बी 8,9, हकोबा इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट, आइ बी पटेल रोड , गोरेगाँव पूर्व मुंबई-400063

15.

7969010

IS 398

भाग ।

1996 31-08-2010

शिरोपरि प्रेषण प्रयोजनों के लिए एल्युमिनियम चालक भाग । एल्युमिनियम, स्टरैडिड चालक

हिंदअॅल्यूमिनियम इंडस्ट्रिज लिमिटेड , सर्वे सं. 1/2, विलेज खुटाली , खानवेल- दुधानी रोड, खानवेल के पास, सिल्वासा, दादरा और नगर हवेली 396230

7984006

04-11-2010

16.

भाग ।

1980

IS 4250

बिजली के घरेलू खाद्य मिक्सर (द्रवीपरक और ग्राइन्डर)

पूनम एन्टरप्राइजेस दुकान सं. 2 , बाबू तांबे चाल , गोदरेज गाला सं. । के पीछे पार्क साईट, विकोली , मुंबई -400 079

17.

7984309

05-11-2010

IS 694

1990

1100 वो तक एवं सहित कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए पी वी सी रोधित केबल

श्री भैरवनाथ केबल इंडस्ट्रीज , सवें सं. 260 , प्लाट सं. 28 , आकार प्रिंटर्स के पास , देमनी रोड , दादरा नगर हवेली , दादरा-396193

[सं. केप्रवि/ 13 : 11 ]

सी.के. महेश्वरी , वैज्ञानिक जी ( प्रमाणन) 1305 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

NewDelhi the 18th Feburary, 2010

S.O. 668. In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 5 ) of regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification ) Regulations , 1988 , the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule :

SCHEDULE

Year

Part Sec .

IS No.

Grant Date

Licence No.

Sl . No.

Title of the Standards

Name and Address

ofthe party

(9)

(6)

(7) (8)

(4)

(5)

(2)

(3)

(1)

2005

IS 1293

08-09-2010

7970702

1 .

Plugs and socket outlets of250 volts and rated current up to 16 amperes.

PressfitPipe & Pro- file Survey No. 127 , Raj Rajeshwari Compound,NR Bombay Rayon, Village: Sonale Thane, Bhiwandi -421302

1990

IS 694 :

08-10-2010

7978314

PVC Insulated cables for working vol- tages upto and including 1100 V

Government Industrial Estate, Kandivli (W) Daksha Cable Inds . Pvt . Ltd. , 143A , Mumbai -400067

1999 06-09-2010

IS371:

7970904

Ceiling Roses Specification

PressfitPipe& Profile Survey No. 127, Raj Rajeshwari Compound, NR Bombay Rayon, Village: Sonale Thane , Bhiwandi- 421302

1996

IS 8828

Electrical

29-07-2010

7960291

Mylite Industries 12, Madhuban Industrial Estate off Mahakali Road, Andheri -E Mumbai -400093

Accessories- CircuitBrea- kers for Over Current Pro- tection for Household and Similar Instal- lations

1980 30-08-2010

IS 4250

7968816

Specification forDomestic Electric Food- Mixers ( Liqui- dizes and Grinders )

Mahaveer Manu- facturing 1st Floor , 29 Edmond Dsouza Compound, Khairani Rd, Sakinaka, Andheri -E Mumbai- 400072 [PART 11 SEC. 3 ( ii) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 / PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

1306

(6)

(7) (8) (9)

(4)

(5)

(2)

(1)

(3)

1980

IS 4250

7972302

10-09-2010

Raj Ratan Appliance Gala No. 15 , Gr. Floor , Mithalal Compound, Shivaji Nagar, Kurar VillageMalad-E Mumbai -400097

Specification for Domestic Electric Food- Mixers ( Liqui- dizes and Grinders)

2005

IS 1293

08-10-2010

7 .

7978415

Ayush Home Appli- ances Gala No. 4, GajiBada. Dargah Lane , B /H Good- Luck Dairy , Halav Pool, Kurla-W Mumbai -400070

Plugs and socket out- lets of250 volts and rated current upto 16 amperes

1997

IS 3854

06-09-2010

7970803

Switches for domestic and similar pur- poses

Pressfit Pipe & Pro- file Survey No. 127 . Raj Rajeshwari Com- pound. NR Bombay Rayon. Village: Sonale Thane , Bhiwandi- 421302

1995

IS 14255 Part I 28-07-2010

7959916

Vishal Cables Pvt.Ltd . PlotNo. E-41 、 Additional Amber- nath , MIDC, Anand Nagar Thane, Amber- nath-E -421506

Aerial Bunched Cables for work- ing voltages upto and inclu- ding 1100 Volts- specification

Part 5

1992

IS398

10 .

26-08-2010

7967915

Polycab Wires Pvt . Ltd. 78-82. Silver Indl . Estate, Bhim- pore. Andaman Daman, Andaman & Nicobar-396210

Aluminium conductors for overhead transmission purposes : Part 5Aluminium conductors- galvanized steel reinfor- ced for extra high voltage (400 ky and above)

IS4250

1980 7962801

09-08-2010

11:

Specification for Domestic Electric Food Mixers ( Liqui- dizes and Grinders)

Kanchan Inter- national Ltd. , Unit - III, Plot No. 9/10 Ground Floor, Somnath Indl . Co -Op Soc Ltd .. Somnath Rd. Daman , Dabhel Daman&Diu - 396210 1307 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7) (8) (9) 12.

7982002

25-10-2010

IS 2993

1998

A.C. motor capacitors

AmitCapacitors Ltd. Plot No. 90 & 91 , Pilerne Industrial Estate North Goa , Bardez Goa -403511

13 .

7982103

25-10-2010

IS 1709

1984

Specification forCapacitors for Electric Fan Motors

AmitCapacitors Ltd. Plot No. 90 & 91 , Pilerne Industrial EstateNorth Goa, Bardez Goa-403511

14.

7959512

27-07-2010

IS 3854

1997

Switches for domestic and similar pur- poses

Matrix Electricals Pvt . Ltd , Gala No. 4 , 2A, 2B , 8, 9, Hakoba Ind . Estate, I.B. Patel Road, Goregaon -E Mumbai -400063

15.

7969010

31-08-2010

IS 398 : Part- 1

1996

Hind Aluminium Inds . Ltd. Survey No. 1/2 , Vill.: Khutalli , Khanvel-Dood- hani Rd . NR Khanvel , Silvassa Dadra and Nagar Haveli-396230

Aluminium conductors for overhead transmission purposes : Part- 1 Alu- minium stranded conductors

16.

7984006

04-11-2010

IS4250

1980

Specification for Domestic Electric Food- Mixers(Liqui- dizes and Grinders)

Poonam Enterprises Shop No. 2 , Babu Tambe Chawl, Opp.Godrej Gala No. 1 , Near Bumb Khana, Parksite, Vikhroli, Greater BombayMumbai Maharashtra- 400079

17 .

7984309

05-11-2010

IS 694

1990

PVC Insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100 V

Shree Bhairavnath Cable Industries SurveyNo. 260, Plot No. 2B , Near Aakar Printers , Demni Road , Dadra and Nagar HaveliDadra Dadra andNagar Haveli -396193

[ No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ]

C. K. MAHESHWARI , Sc . " G " ( Certification) 1308

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6, 2010/ PHALGUNA 15, 1931

PART 11 SEC . 3 (ii) ]

कोयला मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 669. केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि, इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त किये जाने की संभावना है;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस भूमि में कोयले के लिए पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है;

इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. एसईसीएल/बीएसपी/जीएम ( पीएलजी )/ भूमि/366 तारीख 9 दिसम्बर, 2009 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर , शहडोल ( मध्य प्रदेश ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काउंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता 700001 के कार्यालय में या साऊथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व अनुभाग ) , सीपत रोड, बिलासपुर -495006 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है । इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाली भूमि में हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चाटों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से नब्बे दिन के भीतर, भारसाधक अधिकारी या विभागाध्यक्ष ( राजस्व अनुभाग ) साऊथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड , सीपत रोड , बिलासपुर- 495006 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) को भेजेगें ।

अनुसूची

दुलहरा ब्लाक , सोहागपुर क्षेत्र

जिला- शहडोल ( मध्य प्रदेश)

रेखांक संख्या - एसईसीएल /बीएसपी/जीएम ( पीएलजी ) / भूमि/366 तारीख 9 दिसम्बर , 2009 ( पूर्वेक्षण के लिए अधिसूचना भूमि दशति हुए )

टिप्पण

क्षेत्र हेक्टर में

जिला

तहसील

पटवारी हल्का नम्बर

बंदोबस्त नम्बर

ग्राम का नाम

क्रम सं.

1007

सेमरिया

1 .

1023

हर्रा

16 चटहा

272

789

भानपुर

432

19 5.

दगदहा

करूई

855

मिठौरी

439

दुलहरा

322

छिरपानी

935

20 10. सिगुड़ी

करूआताल

11 .

524

निपनिया

12.

675

बक्तावल

13.

सीमा वर्णनः-

381.840

शहडोल

संपूर्ण सोहागपुर

266.542

शहडोल

संपूर्ण सोहागपुर

160.230

शहडोल

संपूर्ण सोहागपुर

515.973

शहडोल

संपूर्ण सोहागपुर

80.890

शहडोल

संपूर्ण सोहागपुर

शहडोल

संपूर्ण

223.883

सोहागपुर

723.670

संपूर्ण शहडोल

सोहागपुर

174.932

शहडोल

संपूर्ण सोहागपुर

206.634

शहडोल

संपूर्ण सोहागपुर

भाग

200.488

शहडोल

सोहागपुर

155.882

संपूर्ण शहडोल

सोहागपुर

212.881

संपूर्ण शहडोल

सोहागपुर

74.376

संपूर्ण शहडोल

सोहागपुर

कुल क्षेत्रः 3378.181 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 8347.48 एकड़ ( लगभग ) क-ख रेखा ग्राम मिठौरी-सिंहपुर के सम्मिलित सीमा में बिन्दु ' क ' से आरंभ होती है और ग्राम मिठौरी-सिंहपुर , दगदहा सिंहपुर , करूई बोड़ारी , दुलहरा- बोड़ारी , करूआताल बोड़ारी के सम्मिलित सीमा से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु ' ख ' पर मिलती है

ख-ग रेखा ग्राम करूआताल , निपनिया, बक्तावल , सिगुड़ी के दक्षिणी सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु ' ग ' पर मिलती है ।

ग-घ रेखा ग्राम सिगुड़ी से होती हुई बिन्दु ' घ ' पर मिलती है । घ-क रेखा ग्राम सिगुड़ी-अमरहा , छिरपानी अमरहा, चटहा- पठोरा , हर्रा पठोरा , सेमरिया चंदनिया के सम्मिलित सीमा से होकर ग्राम मिठौरी के पश्चिमी सीमा से होती हुई आरंभिक बिन्दु ' क ' पर मिलती है ।

[ फा. सं. 43015/1/2010)-पी . आर. आई.डब्ल्यू. ।।

एम. शहाबुद्दीन, अवर सचिव 1309 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 6 , 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

MINISTRY OF COAL

NewDelhi the 23rd February, 2010

S.O. 669. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that Coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the locality mentioned in the Schedule hereto;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957) , ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein;

The plan bearing number SECL /BSP/GM ( PLG ) /Land/366 dated the 9th December, 2009 of the area covered bythis notification can be inspected at the Office of the Collector, Shahdol ( Madhya Pradesh ) or at the Office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata - 700001 or at the Office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited (Revenue Section) , Seepat Road, Bilaspur - 495006 , Chhattisgarh .

All persons interested in the land covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , charts and other documents referred to in sub- section ( 7 ) of section 13 of the said Act to the Office -In -Charge or Head of the Department (Revenue Section ) , South Eastern Coalfields Limited , Seepat Road , Bilaspur- 495006 , Chhattisgarh , within ninety days from the date ofpublication of this notification in the Official Gazette .

SCHEDULE

Dulahara Block . Sohagpur Area

District- Shahdol , Madhya Pradesh

Plan bearing number SECL/BSP/GM ( PLG )/ Land/366 dated the 9th December , 2009 ( Showing the land notified for prospecting).

Tahsil

District

Remarks Bandobast. No.

SI . No.

Patwari halka

number

Area in hectares

Name of village

1007

1 .

Shahdol

381.840

Full Semriya

Sohagpur

Harra

1023

Shahdol

Sohagpur

Full

#266.542

Chatha

272

Full 3.

Shahdol

160.230

Sohagpur

789

Shahdol

515.973

Full Bhanpur

Sohagpur

432

80.890

Full

Shahdol

Dagdaha

Sohagpur

Karui

Shahdol

223.883

Full

Sohagpur

Mithori

855

723.670

Full

Shahdol

Sohagpur

439

Shahdol

Dulahara

8 .

174.932

Fall

Sohagpur

9 .

322

Shahdol

206.634

Full Chhirpani

Sohagpur

10.

935

200.448

Shahdol

Part Siguri

Sohagpur

11 .

Karuatal

155.882

Shahdol

Full

Sohagpur

12.

524

Shahdol

Full

212.881

Nipaniya

Sohagpur

675

13. Baktaval

74.376

Shahdol

Full

Sohagpur

Total: -3378.181 hectares ( approximately) OR 8347.48 acres ( approximately) Boundary Description: -

A-B Line starts from point ' A ' on the common boundary of villages Mithori - Sinhpur and passes along common boundary ofvillages Mithori- Sinhpur , Dagdaha- Sinhpur , Karui- Sinhpur , Karui- Borari , Dulahara - Borari , Karuatal- Borari and meets at point 'B ' .

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6, 2010 / PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

1310

[PART 11 SEC. 3 (ii ) | B-C Line passes along southern boundary of villlage Karuatal , Nipaniya , Baktaval. Siguri and meets at point "C " C-D Line passes through village Siguri and meets at point 'D' .

D-A Line passes along common boundary of villages Siguri - Amraha , Chhirpani - Amraha , Chatha -Pathora , Harra - Pathora . Semriya- Chandaniya then along western village boundary of village Mithori and meets at starting point 'A' .

| F. No. 43015 1 2010 - PRIW - 1 | M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 25 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 670. केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि, इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त किये जाने की संभावना है;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस क्षेत्र में कोयला का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ;

इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. एसईसीएल/बीएसपी/सीजीएम ( पीएलजी ) / भूमि/ 360 तारीख 24 नवम्बर, 2009 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर , कोरबा छत्तीसगढ़ के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, । , काउंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता -700001 के कार्यालय में या साऊथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व अनुभाग ) , सीपत रोड , बिलासपुर -495006 छत्तीसगढ़ के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाली भूमि में हितबद्ध संभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उपधारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चाटों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से नब्बे दिन के भीतर , भारसाधक अधिकारी या विभागाध्यक्ष ( राजस्व ) साऊथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड , सीपत रोड , बिलासपुर 495006 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) को भेजेंगे ।

अनुसूची

बताती कोल्गा ब्लाक , कोरबा क्षेत्र

जिला-कोरबा छत्तीसगढ़

रेखांक संख्या- एसईसीएल/बीएसपी/सीजीएम (पीएलजी )/ भूमि/360 तारीख 24 नवम्बर, 2009 ( पूर्वेक्षण के लिए अधिसूचना भूमि दशति हुए ) (क) राजस्व भूमिः

पटवारी हल्का नम्बर

ग्राम नम्बर क्रम सं. ग्राम

251

केराकछार

1 .

दारन यू/एस 13

260 बताती

261 पसरखेत 13

262 5.

मदनपुर

263 कोल्गा

270

धौराभाठा

252 गिरांव

282 चचिया

288 चाम्पा

10.

जिला

क्षेत्र हेक्टर में टिप्पण तहसील

भाग भैंसमा

कोरबा

140.000

80.000

भाग भैंसमा

कोरवा

भार्ग कोरबा

1000.000

भैंसमा

कोरबा

969.193

भैंसमा

संपूर्ण कोरबा

भैंसमा

1486.751 संपूर्ण कोरबा

भाग

1020.000

भैंसमा

124.379

भैंसमा

कोरबा

संपूर्ण कोरबा

भाग

1560.000

भैंसमा

कोरबा

700.000

भाग भैंसमा

कोरबा

35.000

भाग करतला

योग: - 7115.323 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 17581.96 एकड़ ( लगभग ) 1311 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 6 , 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

(ख) वन भूमि

टिप्पण

क्षेत्र हेक्टर में

तहसील

जिला

वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या

क्रम सं

भाग

भैंसमा

425.000

कोरबा

कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या-2231

भाग

भैंसमा

कोरबा

350.000

02 कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या-2233

भाग

भैंसमा

कोरबा

350.000

03 कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या-2374

भाग

भैंसमा

कोरबा

300.000

04 कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या-2389

योग :- 1425,000 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 3521.17 एकड़ ( लगभग )

कुल योग ( क+ ख ) = 8540.323 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 21103.13 एकड़ ( लगभग ) सीमा वर्णन :

क-ख रेखा ग्राम केराकछार की सीमा में ' क' बिन्दु से आरंभ होती है और आरक्षित वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 2233 , 2231 , 2374 से होती हुई ग्राम कोल्गा आरक्षित वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 2374 की सम्मिलित सीमा में बिन्दु ' ख ' पर मिलती है ।

ख-ग रेखा ग्राम कोल्गा , आरक्षित वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 2389 , ग्राम चचिया से होती हुई ग्राम चचिया चाम्पा की सम्मिलित सीमा में ' ग ' बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

ग-घ रेखा ग्राम चाम्पा , गिरांव से होती हुई ग्राम गिरांव बताती की सम्मिलित सीमा में ' घ ' बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

घ-ड़ रेखा ग्राम बताती , दारन और आरक्षित वन कम्पार्टमेंट संख्या 2233 से होती हुई ग्राम केराकछार की ग्राम सीमा में ' ड़' बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

छ-क रेखा ग्राम केराकछार से होती हुई आरंभिक बिन्दु ' क ' पर मिलती है ।

[फा. सं. 43015/2 /2010- पी. आर. आई. डब्ल्यू ।।

एम. शहाबुद्दीन, अवर सचिव New Delhi the 25th Feburary , 2010

S.O. 670. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that Coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the locality mentioned in the Schedule:

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 ( 20 of 1957 ) , (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein;

The plan bearing number SECL/BSP /GM ( PLG ) / Land/ 360 dated the 24th November , 2009 of the area covered by this notification can be inspected at the Office ofthe Collector , Korba Chhattisgarh or at the Office of the Coal Controller , 1 . Council House Street , Kolkata - 700001 or at the Office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited ( Revenue Section ) , Seepat Road. Bilaspur- 495006 , Chhattisgarh .

All persons interested in the land covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , charts and other documents referred to in sub- section ( 7 ) of Section 13 of the said Act to the Officer - in - Charge or Head of the Department ( Revenue ) South Eastern Coalfields Limited. Seepat Road, Bilaspur- 495006 ( Chhattisgarh ) , within ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette.

SCEEDULE

Batati-Kolga Block , Korba Area

District- Korba , Chhattisgarh

Plan number SECL/ BSP / CGM ( PLG ) / Land/360 dated the 24th November , 2009 ( Showing the land notified for prospecting).

688GI /10-8 1312

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

(A) Revenue Land :

village

Patawari halka number

SI No

Village number

251 Kerakachhar

Daran U/S

Batati

260 4

Pasharkhet

261

262 5.

Madanpur

263 6.

Kolga

Dhaurabhatha 13

270

252 8.

Giraon

282 Chachia

288 10. Champa

PART 11 SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] Tahsil

District

Remarks

Area in hectares

Bhaisma

Korba

140.000

Part Korba

80.000

Part Bhaisma

Korba

Bhaisma

1000.000

Part Korba

969.193

Bhaisma

Part

1486.751

Korba

Bhaisma

Part Korba

1020.000

Part Bhaisma

Bhaisma

Korba

124.379

Part

1560.000

Korba

Part Bhaisma

700.000

Bhaisma

Korba

Part Kartala

Korba

35.000

Part

Total: -7115.323 hectares ( approximately ) OR 17581.96 acres ( approximately) (B) Forest Land :

SINo.

Tahsil Forest Compartment Number

01 .

Bhaisma

Compartment Number- 2231

02.

Bhaisma

Compartment Number - 2233

03.

Bhaisma

Compartment Number -2374

Bhaisma

04. Compartment Number - 2289

District

Remarks Area in hectares

425.000

Korba

Part Korba

350.000

Part Korba

350.000

Part Korba

Part 300.000

Total: 1425.000 hectares ( approximately ) OR 3521.17 acres ( apprximately) BoundaryDescription : -

GrandTotal(A + B ) = 8540.323 hectares ( apprximately)

OR 21103.13 acres ( apprximately) A-B Line starts from point A on the village boundary of village Kerakachhar and passes through Reserve Forest Compartment number 2233 , 2231 , 2374 and meets at point B on the common boundary of village Kolga- Reserve Forest Compartment number 237-4 .

B-C Line passes through village Kolga , Reserve Forest Compartment number 2389 , village Chachia and meets at point Con the common boundary of villages Chachia- Champa.

C-D Line passes through village Champa, Giraon and meets at point Don the common boundary of villages Giraon- Batati .

DE Line passes through village Batati , Daran and Reserve Forest Compartment number 2233 and meets at point "E on the village boundary of village Kerakachhar .

E -A Line passes through village Kerakachhar and meets at starting point A.

[No. 43015/2/2010 -PRIW - 1 ]

M. SHAHBUDEEN , Under Secy .

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 22 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 671.- भारत सरकार ने , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाईन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण में मैसर्स गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाईन बिछाने के लिए उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन संलग्न अनुसूची के कालम ( 1 ) में वर्णित व्यक्ति को कालम ( 2) में वर्णित क्षेत्र में सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कृत्यों का पालन करने के लिए नियुक्त करती है ।

अनुसूची

अधिकारिता का क्षेत्र व्यक्ति का नाम और पता

(2)

(1)

सम्पूर्ण

श्री राजीव कुमार,

बिहार एवं राजस्व अधिकारी ,

झारखंड राज्य प्रतिनियुक्तिपर,

मैसर्स गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में पटना, बिहार

[फा. सं. एल-14014/ 19/09-जी.पी. ] स्नेह प्रभा मदान , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS New Delhi , the 22nd February, 2010

S.O. 671. Whereas in pursuance of clause (a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) The Government of India hereby authorizes the personmentioned in column ( 1) ofthe Schedule give below to perform the functions ofthe Competent Authority under the said Act for laying pipelinesby the said M / s . GAIL (India) Limited in the area mentioned in column (2) ofthe said schedule .

जिला

SCHEDULE

Area ofJurisdiction Name and Address of the person

(2) (1)

Whole State ofBihar

(1) Shri Rajeev Kumar ,

and Jharkhand Revenue Officer,

on deputation to

M/s. GAIL (India) Limited,

Patna, Bihar.

[F. No. L- 14014/ 19/09-G.P. ] SNEH P. MADAN , Under Secy. नई दिल्ली, 26 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 672.-भारत सरकार ने, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाईन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या

1313

का.आ. 2421 ( अ ) तारीख 22-9-2009 और संख्या का.आ. 1806 ( अ ) तारीख 22-7-2009 द्वारा , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड द्वारा मध्य प्रदेश राज्य में दहेज - वेमार - विजयपुर पाइपलाईन परियोजना के माध्यम से प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाईन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थीं;

और , उक्त राजपत्रित अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 20-10-2009 से 30-10-2009 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;

और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने जनता से प्राप्त आक्षेपों को परीक्षण के उपरांत अस्वीकृत कर दिया है;

और, सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;

और , भारत सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्और यह संतुष्ट हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है;

अतः , अब , भारत सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है;

और, भारत सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, निर्देश देती है कि पाइपलाइनें बिछाने के लिए भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार , इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को , भारत सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए , पाइपलाइनें बिछाने का प्रस्ताव करने वाली गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा और तदुपरि , भूमि में ऐसे उपयोग का अधिकार , इस प्रकार अधिरोपित निबंधनों और शतों के अधीन रहते हुए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, गेल ( इण्डिया ) लिमिटेड में निहित होगा । अनुसूची

सर्वे नं. आर. ओं. यू.

तालुका गांव

अर्जित करने के

लिए क्षेत्रफल (हेक्टेयर में)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

1.04

554

कल्याणपुरा

झबुआ

0.45

553/2

0.01

552

0.09

718

0.03

719

0.16

720

0.10

724

0.09

728

0.02

725

0.01

707

0.04

730

0.01

759 1314

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 6 , 2010/ PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

760

झबुआ

0.20

झबुआ कल्याणपुरा

765

पेटलावद झांवलिया

0.11

झबुआ

758

766

0.15

0.01 744/2

764

0.13

0.19

757

633

0.01

0.14

0.01

767

756

0.01

771

0.04 744/3

0.06

770

1.05

750

0.06

266

योग

0.30

1.36

265

0.03

मोहनकोट

197

0.15

793

0.07

193

0.09

192

0.12

योग

3.26

187

0.03 धावडीपाडा

0.06

201

0.04

0.01

202

0.06

0.03

186

0.01

0.06

203

0.06

0.02

204

0.06

0.02

205

0.06

185

0.01

0.05

212

0.12

0.02

213

0.03

योग

0.23

214

0.10

583

भमरदा

0.01

2153

0.09

582

0.11

180

0.01

584

0.09

218

0.10

585

0.05

219/17

0.19

588

0.15

219/16

0.01

591

0.07

219/15

0.15

579

233

0.06

0.14

232

594

0.01

234

0.01

592

0.04

200

0.01

597

0.14

194

0.09

598

0.05

231

0.03

575

0.02

227/2

0.01

573

0.14

228/1

0.09

567

0.02

228-2

0.07

572

0.01

228-3

0.09

569

0.13

0.03

562

0.03

97.1

0.01

561

0.06

946

0.05

559

0.09

947

0.02

560

0.01

948

0.19

558

0.01

955

0.07

557

0.04

958

0.09 555

0.01

956

0.01

576

050

0.04

568

968

0.04

0.01

969

0.01 योग

1.43 1315 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

[भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(4)

(5)

(3)

(1)

(2)

(4)

(5)

(2) (3)

(1)

329

0.02 970

0.13

रायपुरिया

पेटलावद

झबुआ

मोहनकोट

पेटलावद

झबुआ

0.02

328

975

0.07

0.01

327

0.22

976

0.02

330

0.05

978

0.10

0.09

111

979

0.01

112

0.05

980

0.14

109

1057

0.05

0.01

108

3.27

योग

0.02

115

0.18

737

रायपुरिया

0.10

116

0.18

694

117

0.02

0.01

739

114

0.05 693

0.01

0.15

140

0.18

688

0.07

139

0.02

692

0.08

137

0.12

691

0.13

136

0.06

690

0.03

128

0.01

463

0.07

124

0.04

461

3.57

योग

736

0.01

462

0.01

0.04

137

सागाडिया

0.01

459

0.08

139

0.14

464

0.04

140

465

0.15

0.01

141

0.01

466

0.04

167

0.01

458

0.07

166

0.06

371

0.08

165

0.09

370

0.14

158

0.02

369

0.03

159

0.04

376

0.04

152

377

0.08

0.01

153

0.06

378

151

0.02

0.06

363

0.01

150

362

0.07

0.03

314

0.05

361

0.02

315

360

0.02

0.20

313

0.09

344

0.08

313/780

0.14

355

0.04

353

0.06

354

0.08

354

0.01

353

0.17

358

0.06

384

361/2

0.01 385

0.22

362

0.22

0.02

346

0.19

364/1

0.02

345

0.02

365

0.04

341

0.03

363

0.02

340

0.02

357

0.03

337

0.06

364

338

0.03

542/1

0.04

0.02

336

0.09

543

0.05

333

0.10

545/1

0.01

331 1316

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 6 , 2010 /PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(1) पेटलावद सागाडिया

547

0.04 झबुआ

धार

548/1

0.03

536

0.05

534

0.04

535

0.04

533

0.05

532

0.03

529

0.04

530

0.01

531

0.04

524

0.14

522

0.09

526

0.04

467

0.06

468

0.02

0.12

469

472

0.35

508

0.11

453

0.17

507

0.01

473

0.06

474

0.02

505

0.19

490

0.26

491

0.24

493

0.02

495

0.12

496

0.03

494

0.13

499

0.12

485

0.01

4.69

योग

धार बदनावर करौदा

0.04

352/1

0.07

352/2

0.09

347

0.05

0.0

0.08

28/2

0.06

29/1

0.49

0.01

0.06

33/1

0.21

0.02

0.09

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) |

(4)

(5) (2) (3)

0.09 बदनावर करौदा

0.04

0.10

64/1

0.01

63/1

0.19

0.03

45/1

0.01

61/5

0.01

6171

0.05

56/2

0.04

56/1

0.27

0.12

0.28

0.01

0.04

0.22

0.07

0.06

योग

3.01

983

काच्चीबडोदा

0.03

994/ 1/1.1

0.05

1009/2

0.18

1009/11

0.38

1010/1

0.07

1024

0.14

1023

0.14

1022/1

0.01

10201

0.41

1013

0.21

10182

0.03

1018-1

0.09

928-1

0.35

9291

0.07

925

0.10

1031

0.01

1032

0.04

1033

3.38

653

0.06

654

0.17

650

0.04

656

0.03

660

0.01

0.47

664

676

0.18

678

0.18 [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 (ii)]

1317 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5) धार

बदनावर

677

काच्चीबडोदा

0.05

उज्जैन

घटिया रलायतीहेवत

0.38 675

0.27

130

0.30 667

0.14

146

0.41 668/1

0.19

148

0.34 606

0.01

योग

3.94 605

0.11

उज्जैन

252

0.04

बड़नगर मुरारखेड़ी

604

0.01

0.05 603

0.02

0.14 602

0.13

0.04 592/2

0.17

0.01 593

0.03

0.12 590

0.12

0.02 589/1/1/1

0.43

0.09 588

0.03

0.19

568/2

0.13

0.02

0.01 570

0.07

0.01 571

0.15

0.16

0.12

554

0.04

555/2

0.08

0.03

559

0.03

0.19 555/1

0.09

0.10 556/1

0.02

0.19 480

0.04

0.02 479/2

0.64

0.07

0.06

0.15 406

408

77/1

0.12

0.02

0.32 योग

6.95

0.04 उज्जैन घटिया रलायतीहेवत 240

0.04

0.02 238

0.01

121

0.03 239

0.32

120

0.10 24

0.04

0.28 2/1

0.03

0.03 3

101

0.05

0.32

102

0.39 4

0.04

योग

3.08 9

0.14

[ फा. सं. एल-14014/ 15/09- जी.पी. भाग-111 | 8

0.40

स्नेह प्रभा मदान , अवर सचिव 20

0.10

NewDelhi , the 26th February , 2010

0.25

0.01

0.23

0.04

0.15

112

0.02

111

0.15

110

0.18

S.O. 672. Whereas by notification of Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 2421 (E ) dated 22nd September , 2009 and S.O. 1806 ( E ) dated 22nd July , 2009 issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of Users in Land) Act . 1962 ( 50 of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , Government of India declared its intention to acquire the Right ofUser in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that PART 11 SEC. 3 ( ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 6 , 2010/ PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

1318

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

0.06

Kalyanpura 750

Jhabua

0.30

266

(Μ.Ρ.)

notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of natural gas through Dahej - Vemar Vijaipur pipeline project in the State of Madhya Pradesh by GAIL (India)Limited;

265

0.03

793

0.07

3.26

Total

Andwhereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public from 20-10-2009 to 30-10-2009.

0.06

Dhawadipada

0.01

0.03

And whereas the objections received from the public to the laying of the pipeline have been considered and disallowed by the Competent Authority;

0.06

0.02

And whereas the Competent Authority has, under sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted its report to Government of India;

0.02

0.01

0.02

0.23

Total

And whereas the Government of India , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipelines , has decided to acquire the Right of User therein;

0.01

583

Bhamarda

0.11

582

0.09

584

0.05

585

0.15 Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , Government of India hereby declares that the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

588

0.07

591

0.06

579

0.01

594

0.04

592

0.14

597

0.05

598

And , further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, Government of India hereby directs that the Right of User in the land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in Government of India, vest , on the date of the publication of the declaration , in GAIL ( India) Limited, free from all encumbrances .

0.02

575

SCHEDULE

0.14

573

Tehsil

District

Village

0.02

567

Survey No.

0.01

572

Area to be

acquiredfor

forROU

0.13

569

(inHectare)

0.03

562

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

0.06

561

1.04

554

Kalyanpura

Jhabua

0.09

559

0.45

553/2

Jhabua (Μ. Ρ.)

0.01

560

0.01

552

0.01

558

0.09

718

0.04

557

0.03

719

0.0

555

0.16

720

0.04

576

0.10

724

0.04

568

0.09

728

1.43

0.02

Total

725

0.01

707

0.11

765

Jhabua Petlawad Jhawlia

0.04

0.01

766

730

(Μ . Ρ . )

0.13

0.01

759

761

0.20

0.01

633

760

0.15

0.01

758

767

0.19

0.04

771 744/2

105

0.14

757

770

0.01

756

1.36

Total

0.06

7443 [भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 (ii)

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

1319 (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(1)

(2) (3)

(4)

(5) Jhabua Petlawad Mohankot 197

0.15

737

Jhabua Petlawad Raipuriya

0.18 (Μ.Ρ.)

193

0.09

(Μ . Ρ .)

694

0.18 192

0.12

739

0.01 187

0.03

693

0.01 201

0.04

688

0.18 202

0.06

692

0.02 186

0.01

691

0.12 203

0.06

690

0.06 204

0.06

463

0.01 205

0.06

461

0.04 185

0.05

736

0.01 212

0.12

462

0.01 213

0.03

459

0.01 214

0.10

464

0.14 215/3

0.09

465

0.15 180

0.01

466

218

0.10

458

0.01 219/17

371

0.19

0.06 219/16

37)

0.01

0.09 219/15

369

0.15

0.02

376

233

0.14

0.04

377

232

0.01

0.08

378

234

0.06

0.01

363

299

0.06

0.01

362

194

0.07

0.09

361

0.05 231

0.03

360

0.02 227/2

0.01

344

0.09 228/1

0.09

355

228/2

0.14

0.07

35-4

0.06 228/3

0.09

353

0.01 229

0.03

384

0.06 974

0.01

385

0.22 946

0.05

346

0.02 947

0.02

345

0.02 948

0.19

341

0.04 955

0.07

340

0.02 958

0.09

337

0.03 956

0.01

338

0.03 959

0.04

336

0:02 968

0.01

333

0.05

331

969

0.01

0.01 970

329

0.02

0.13

328

975

0.02

0.07

327

0.01 976

0.22

330

0.02 978

0.05

0.10 979

0.09

112

0.01 980

0.05

100

0.14 1057

0.05

108

0.01 Total

115

3.27

0.02 688 GI/109 [PART 11 -SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 1320

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

(5)

(3)

(4)

(2)

(1)

(4)

(5)

(3)

(2)

(1)

0.14

524

0.10

116

Jhabua Petlawad Sagadiya

Jhabua Petlawad Raipuriya

0.09

522

0.02

117

(Μ. Ρ.)

(Μ.Ρ.)

526

0.04

0.05

114

0.06

467

0.15

140

468

0.02

0.07

139

0.12

469

0.08

137

472

0.35

0.13

136

0.11

508

0.03

128

153

0.17

0.07

124

0.01

507

3.57

Total

473

0.06

0.04

137

Sagadiya

0.02

474

0.08

139

0.19

505

0.04

1-40

0.26

490

141

0.01

491

0.24

0.04

167

0.02

493

0.07

166

0.12

495

0.08

165

0.03

496

0.14

158

0.13

494

0.03

159

0.12

499

0.04

152

0.01

485

0.01

153

4.69

Total

0.02

151

(0.04

001

150

0.07

3521

0.03

314

0.09

352/2

0.02

315

0.05

3-47

0.20

313

0.01

0.08

313/780

0.08

0.04

353

0.08

354

0.06

28/2

0.17

358

0.49

29/1

0.01

361/2

0.01

0.22

362

0.06

0.19

364/1

0.21

33/1

0.02

565

0.02

0.03

363

0.09

0.02

357

0.09

0.06

564

0.04

5-42/ 1

0.10

0.09

543

0.01

6-4/1

0.10

545/1

0.01

0.04

547

0.19

63: 1

0.03

548/1

0.06

0.05

536

0.01

451

0.04

534

0.01

611

0.04

535

0.05

61/1

0.05

533

56/2

0.04

0.03

532

0.27

56/1

0.04

529

0.12

0.01

530

0.28

0.04

531 [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1321 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

(2)

(1)

(5)

(3)

(4)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5) 84

0.01

555/2

Dhar

0.08 Jhabua Petlawad Sagadiya

0.04

Badna- war

(Μ . Ρ.)

559

(Μ . Ρ.)

Kachi Baroda

0.03 87

0.22

555/1

0.09

0.07

556/1

0.02 94

0.06

480

0.04

479/2

0.64 Total

3.01

406

0.06 Dhar

983

0.03

Badna- Kachi

408

0.12 war

994/1/1/1

(Μ . Ρ .)

Baroda

0.05

1009/2

0.18

Total

6.95

0.38

1009/1/1

240

0.04

Ujjain Ghatiya

1010/1

0.07

Ralayati- Hevat

238

(Μ. Ρ.)

0.01 1024

0.14

239

0.32 1023

0.14

0.04 1022/1

0.01

2/1

0.03 1020/1/1

0.41

0.32

0.21

1013

0.04 1018/2

0.03

0.04 1018/1

0.09

0.14 928/1

0.35

0.40 929/1

0.07

0.10

925

0.10

0.25 1031

0.01

0.01 1032

0.04

0.23 1033

0.38

0.04 653

0.03

0.15 654

0.17

112

0.02 659

0.04

0.15

111

656

0.03

110

0.18 660

0.01

0.38 664

0.47

130

0.30 676

0.18

0.41

146

678

0.18

148

0.34 677

0.05

Total

3.94 675

0.27

252

0.04 667

0.14

0.05

Ujjain (Μ . Ρ.) Badna- Murarkhedi gar

668/1

0.19

0.14 606

0.01

0.04 605

0.11

0.01 604

0.01

0.12 603

0.02

0.02 602

0.13

0.09

0.17

592/2

0.19 593

0.03

0.13 590

0.12

0.01 589/1/1/1

0.43

0.01

0.03

588

568/2

0.02

0.16 570

0.07

0.04

571

0.15

0.03

554

0.12

0.19 1322

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6, 2010 / PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[PART 11 SEC 3 (ii ) | (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

अनुसूची

Ujjain Badna- Murarkhedi

तहसील : हिन्दोल

0.10

जिला : ढेन्कानाल राज्य: उड़ीसा gar

(Μ . Ρ.)

0.19

गांव का

प्लॉट

क्षत्रफल

0.02

नं.

नाम

हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग मीटर 78

0.07

5 79

0.15

गन्जरा

736

58 77/1

0.02

735

02 90

0.32

698

16 91

0.04

1968

00 95

0.02

697

35 121

0.03

696

59 120

0.10

695

46 97

0.28

687

28 96

0.03

623

16 101

0.05

1824

98 102

622

0.39

621

82 Total

3.08

620

618

08 [ F. No. L -14014/15/09 - G.P. -Part - 1 ] SNEH P. MADAN, Under Secy

617

613

14 नई दिल्ली, 23 फरवरी 2010

129

(01

122

49 का. आ. 673. कंन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप ( उड़ीसा ) से रायपुर ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) एवं राँची ( झारखण्ड ) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा " पारादीप- न्यू सम्बलपुर- रायपुर राँची पाइपलाईन" बिछाई जानी चाहिए;

(X)

00 और कंन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाईन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि जिसके नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपावद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

0000

(X)

56 अतः अय, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमिमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है:

(X)

1902

000

02 30

(0)

(X)

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं. इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाईन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्री सुकान्त कुमार प्रधान , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा , पारादीप न्यू सम्बलपुर रायपुर राँची पाइपलाईन परियोजना , 1295. फॉरस्ट पार्क, भुवनेश्वर 751009 ( उड़ीसा ) को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेंगा ।

10 (भाग ।। - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 6 , 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(1)

(4) (5) ब्राह्मणिआपाल

1901

1323 (2)

(3) (4) (5)

ब्राह्मणिआपाल

1905

1906

1917

1939

1955

1958

1959

1961

1962

05 48

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1976

2054

2038

16 2039

1133

1134

1132

300

89 2188

322

325

489

62 2173

286

284

287

283

282

280

275

33 276

04 60

277

278

10 270

75 263

84 262

58 261

27 260

09 46

258

10 2135

223

222

221

208

207

77 206

37 205

204

10 202

201

(0)

06 200

28 198

05 10 197

92 196

(00

195

(0)

33 185

10 181

(02

20 183

47 180

10 00

186

67 00

182

178

21 177

02 146

84 145

(00

57 147

63 148

91 149

74 150

-12 2184

15 135

81 134

62 122

26 133

52 132

24 131

11 124

67 125

60 126

10 123

10 100

34 101

71 104

103

56 102

03 58

28 60

27 55

91 54

87 53

32 50

87 51

56 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6, 2010 / PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

1324

(4) (5)

(1) (2)

(3)

(1)

बम्फा

ब्राह्मणिआपाल

2205

2187

2179

02 28

2063

बम्फा

2060

2059

5047

2048

2045

2050

2039

1934

15.

1935

1941

1937

1940

1939

2328

1944

1945

1923

1850

1849

1848

1847

1853

1854

1844

भिन्गिरा

1825

1824

1823

1829

1833

1832

1831

1811

(0)

1788

1713

1712

[PART 11 SEC. 3 (ii) ]

(5) (3) (4)

(2)

09 00

1711

41 00

1710

59 00

1707

24 00

1708

75 00

1709

56 00

313

10 00

311

53 70

29 00

01 01 2291

10 00

97 86

2329

123

2333

2334

2285

2284

27 30

(x)

2265

2271

533

532

531

530

529

528

526

이

525

524

523

519 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(5)

(1)

(3) (4)

(2)

(1)

517

ब्रह्मपुर भिन्गिरा

515

514

513

07 92

512

901

01 19

511

494

495

492

खण्डतिरि

490

491

449

447

445

444

443

442

433

434

427

435

406

426

425

407

422

408

421

420

409

410

411

881

817

915

310

146

145

147

135

137

136

01 08

118

117

116

112

114

1325

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

21 00

3057

02 05 2670

45 00

3095

2671

26 2672

10 00

2669

79 00

3101

51 2668

06 00

2661

24 00

2659

3309

02 93 3801

95 3308

15 00

3307

3305

52 00

3295

17 00

3296

3297

3299

10 00

3300

3291

87 3290

76 3289

05 26 398

3775

04 98 399

31 401

403

391

3738

295

371

62 368

52 3723

369

67 3715

54 370

83 375

83 576

575

573

17 574

569

13 98

86 564

565

566

14 98 548

10 543

544

77 545 1326

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 6, 2010/PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

(1) खण्डतिरि

546

गिरिधरप्रसाद

547

02 56

696

698

697

699

700

693

690

689

686

688

687

707

680

708

709

714

3807

713

(x)

775

3702

781

780

778

779

776

1103

(09

1104

कारन्दा 3770

गिरिधरप्रसाद

198

199

228

227

226

230

225

272

435

438

436

(02

430

437

000

429

428

426

427

425

451

[PART 11 SEC. 3 (ii ) ] (2)

(3) (4) (5) 450

10 452

54 454

10 453

62 421

07 457

16 460

44 459

43 480

45 481

13 520

23 521

70 522

72 523

83 524

83 519

46 517

74 516

514

74 495

10 513

02 512

10 496

58 498

500

3646

501

03 . 88 1

32 00

3831

10 00

3802

96 3804

61 00

3805

(X)

3803

95 3808

3807

10 3809

63 3797

82 3815

41 3796

30 3817

37 3816

3837

65 3864

79 3867

52 3865

11 3866

35 3861

25 3862

86 3859

98 3858

20 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

(2)

(4) (5)

(3)

(1) (1)

कारन्दा

3857

कारन्दा

3913

14305

3909

3910

3911

3926

3927

3933

3932

4279

3931

4278

4280

4276

4275

4272

4289

4273

4270

4271

4267

14222

426

4246

4253

4247

4252

4251

4248

5285

5238

5284

5287

5281

5283

22.

5288

5282

5290

5312

5323

5329

5327

5326

5368

5367

5361

5365

5371

5366

04 60 688 GI /10 10

1327 (2)

(3)

(5)

(4)

30 5372

29 5373

5374

5377

39 5378

5379

88 5380

86 5381

01 5382

5385

5386

5387

26 5400

61 14302

5393

02 14303

93 14294

20 5394

29 5419

5418

(0)

5423

5434

5433

50 5432

21 14236

12 5429

16 5428

33 5427

5426

7.1 5425

14221

60 5902

5901

63 5813

75 13877

5812

68 5811

5810

5805

36 5557

83 5586

08 5558

80 5802

5803

5559

71 5563

25 5543

5564

58 5542

5740 1328

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/ PHALGUNA 15. 1931

(2)

( 1)

(3) (4) (5)

( 1)

5562

कारन्दा

ठोकर

5565

5737

5568

5736

01 40

000

5738

5718

5719

07 63

5720

5712

5713

5710

5709

5716

5706

00 88

13863

5704

(X)

5705

5703

ठोकर

3913

3905

3910

3906

3907

3899

3855

3900

3942

3941

4176

3831

3830

3829

3828

3827

3621

3622

3623

3624

3620

3617

3618

09 40

3616

3615

07 3631

3613

3612

04 64

78 3610

3611

3767

SEC. 3 ( ii ) |

PART 1

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

320

42 319

20 00

318

10 00

321

41 323

06 314

322

04 332

10 345

14 00

333

334

63 3926

04 00

335

20 343

11 00

336

68 344

이

16 3993

62 342

10 00

341

18 $40

74 356

272

55 271

87 268

37 00

267

01 266

263

264

02 265

10 00

261

42 260

238

77 259

50 00

258

69 257

255

10 256

97 00

240

96 00

242

88 00

241

000

243

70 00

234

95 (X)

233

87 229

45 00

(0)

228

10 226

47 227

76 00

225

78 224

07 33 150

39 [भाग ।। - खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

(1)

(4)

(2)

(5)

(3)

(1)

152

10 ठोकर

नुआ

3973

153

4194

137

133

138

3970

3959

3958

3828

नुआ

00 35

3825

3826

3824

3821

05 46

3822

3823

3677

3678

3679

3680

3681

3682

3700

3699

3696

3697

3636

3635

3637

3634

3652

3632

3631

3621

3602

1329

(4)

(2)

(5) (3)

86 3605

70 00

3604

50 00

(0)

3607

89 3608

43 5456

3609

83 3617

3615

36 3614

24 2823

3015

10 00

(X)

12 3014

07 2824

(X)

3011

95 3012

50 00

3010

84 3036

3008

3037

24 3007

000

12 5339

10 3038

3039

08 3040

85 00

3043

3044

3256

80 00

3059

3060

28 00

63 3092

80 00

3091

07 00

3090

10 3255

87 00

3088

03 3095

7) 3087

3096

73 3097

3086

이

87 3098

16 3130

3085

3131

42 3132

(6) 3150

(0)

3151

3149

10 00

3148

10 3147

3166 1330

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

(2)

(5)

(1)

(3) (4)

(1) 3165

तकीबंडा नुआ

3167

3168

3169

3170

02 39

5442

758

तर्काबंडा

3252

3251

3241

(X)

3247

(X)

3245

00 32

4337

3243

3242

3238

(X)

3237

3236

(x)

りう

(X)

3234

3231

(x)

3233

3232

(02

3192

(0)

3181

(X)

3180

(x)

3182

(X)

3178

(X)

3179

3176

3174

3175

317

3170

3146

3147

3145

(00

3151

3152

3139

(X)

4275

4276

3128

3127

(X)

(60

3123

3122

(X)

(02

3415

000

3121

000

3120

3-416

3417

[ PARI 11 ---SEC. 3 ( ii ) | (2)

(3) (4) (5)

78 4291

(09

3418

72 3419

(X)

3435

3-43-4

4288

3426

86 3038

79 3034

3035

20 2795

(X)

2794

2798

2797

95 2803

05.

2807

10 2802

2804

50 2805

2806

10 2768

2766

2765

2767

2764

2761

275-1

41 00

2755

2756

(X)

2753

28 2750

(X) 2751

(X)

42 27-48

(X)

2747

2740

2744

2905

(X)

2906

-47 2908

84 2907

72 00

2009

2912

(X)

2913

(X)

15 292-4

55 2929

23 2928

00 00

2932

88 2927

13 2933

( X) भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(1)

(5)

(3) (4)

(2)

(1)

तकबिडा

2926

तकंबिडा

2524

2523

2518

2520

2521

2519

2190

कडला

2189

2191

2173

2177

2174

2185

2184

2183

2179

2178

2181

2180

1563

1565

1566

1567

1570

1569

1572

1573

1574

1555

1553

1461

1-469

1462

1463

4384

1-464

1532

1529

1528

1522

1519

1518

1516

1515

1514

1507

1.499

1506

1500

1331

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

1501

05 48 1505

4373

1504

18 00

1503

1486

1488

1487

2147

2179

2180

2178

2187

2188

2173

2191

2190

2192

2193

51 2194

2201

2200

2198

2199

2139

2084

2085

2083

2067

2069

2070

01 2068

2021

2011

2019

65 2020

1992

2030

2029

2031

1991

2032

2035

(X)

2036

1973

1925

06 1972

1927

1928

1931 1332

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 6, 2010/PHALGUNA 15, 1931

(2)

(3)

(1)

(4) (5)

(1)

1971

कडाला

बडमुण्डा 1932

1935

03 04

1936

1937

1940

1942

1944

10-

1943

10 50

1945

1946

1872

1873

917

000

बडमुण्डा

1442

915

1441

1440

1439

1506

914

913

912

911

970

02 40

971

05 40

972

1-493

1271

973

981

979

978

980

977

976

02 35

467

466

164

1501

नरहरिपुर

463

462

461

1298

475

459

476

477

1365

[PART 11 SEC . 3 (ii) ] (2)

(3) (4) (5) 00

1364

18 453

84 452

10 451

80 491

45 1554

1380

10 141

19 142

12 88 00

139

143

30 145

47 158

157

20 00

124

126

40 131

125

79 00

1388

20 122

90 97

72 00

08 72 95

78 39

92 25

10 26

88 00

28 29

97 18

18 30

1) 31

7) 00

00 46 9

2:4 00

14 00

61 2

00 6

10 335

20 00

336

58 00

398

333

(X)

394

59 334

394

(X)

59 00

58 393

392

87 00

(0)

391 [ भाग ।। - खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

(5)

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (1)

313

07 56

1333

(4) (5) (2)

(3)

(X)

10 1380

पाइकपुरुणाकोट

नरहरिपुर

314

312

311

310

309

308

408

02 63

1553

पाइकपुरुणाकोट

1554

1568

1559

1567

1560

2069

1562

1561

1500

1498

1497

1496

1470

1471

1472

1463

1473

1474

1461

1409

1408

1407

1410

1411

1459

1458

ΟΙ

1457

1432

1424

1422

1423

1421

1395

1396

2095

1393

1385

1384

1883

1381

1382

68 00

1378

23 1377

65 1375

33 1376

00 05

10 1122

17 1128

1129

1130

38 00

80 00

1131

42 00

1243

(X)

1244

1241

10 1242

22 2056

(0)

42 1245

2055

54 1234

78 1233

1406

03 -40 1247

( x)

1249

30 1248

52 00

59 1252

82 1251

2125

10 00

52 1262

12 2110

10 253

52 2108

2109

25 259

298

10 00

43 260

28 297

261

91 262

12 265

10 267

17. 268

208

269

33 00

87 270

271

20 272

40 273

62 156

(0)

10 157

(0)

53 2115

95 155 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 /PHALGUNA 15,1931

1334

(4) (5)

(1)

(3)

(2)

(1)

153

(09

SEC3 ( ii ) |

PART II

(4) (5) (3)

(2 )

(X)

85 1825

ब्राह्मणपुरणाकोट

पाइकपुरुणाकोट

2206

000

03 46

840

नण्डेइलो

1616

ब्राह्मणपुरुणाकोट

313

314

1693

315

12 60

317

318

316

329

330

590

( 0

350

328

332

327

1646

1647

349

334

335

(X)

176

(X)

175

177

174

172

171

1618

167

(7)

(0)

166

119

(0)

121

122

76 00

118

80 129

117

65 114

113

1653

1654

72 51

(1)

08 (0)

62 41

(00

89 00

08 35

200

28 1014

32 251

43 217

85 218

(۴)

2200

221

( 0

57 223

(X)

85 210

000

10 22.4

000

209

208

207

(X) 202

(0)

(X)

57 204

82 205

206

82 203

(X)

170

171

34 172

000

70 178

177

89 150

(0)

93 149

148

147

18 145

82 146

90 153

59 979

(X)

111 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

(1)

19 नण्डेइलो

1335

(4)

(2)

(5)

(3)

131

पाणघुडुधुडा

87.

980

सन्जपडा

3311

3377

3310

3378

3312

3376

3375

3316

3317

3421

3318

3322

3323

3315

3352

3324

3334

3335

3332

3330

3329

3340

800

पाणघुड्छुडा

293

292

111

110

105

आमना

106

107

104

103

102

122

126

127

128

129

130

688 GI/1011

251

51 252

60 253

250

75 249

10 248

43 134

881

10 00

136

37 135

02 69

137

65 00

25 880

138

26 81

43 80

20 00

139

07 00

140

141

97 79

143

95 142

46 145

00 00

146

00.

38 147

181

10 182

53 00

183

45 184

185

00 00

186

54 00

193

03 194

76 360

86 359

38 366

42 357

356

42 00

801

367

06 369

10 00

2385

02 2217

2210

60 2192

39 2190

27 2182

88 2179

88 627

10 88 626

57 09 [सं. आर-250/ 1/1/2010- ओ आर-1] बी. के. दत्ता , अवर सचिव 1336

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/ PHALGUNA 15, 1931

(5)

(2)

(3) (4)

(1)

New Delhi , the 23rd February, 2010

Ganjara

13 S.O. 673. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Orissa) to Raipur ( Chattisgarh ) and Ranchi ( Jharkhand) , Paradip New Sambalpur Raipur Ranchi Pipeline should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And, whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is neces- saryto acquire the right of user in the land described in the Schedule annexed to this notification .

05 08

Now, therefore , in exercise of powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962, (50 of 1962 ) the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein .

05 60

1902

02 Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may , within twenty - one days from the date ofwhich the copies of the notification as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public. object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user herein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Sukanta Kumar Pradhan , Competent Authority , Indian Oil Corpora- tion Limited , Paradip New Sambalpur Raipur--Ranchi Pipeline Project , 1295 , Forest Park, Bhubneswar- 751009, (Orissa) .

00 SCHEDULE

State : Orissa

Tehsil : Hindol District : Dhenkanal

1901

Brahmaniapal

Name of

Area

1905

03 Plot No. Hectare Are Sq.mtr .

theVillage

1906

1917

736

1939

Ganjara

10- 735

1955

04 698

1958

1968

1959

1961

697

1962

696

695

1963

67 687

1964

08 623

1965

00 1824

1966

02 622

1967

43 621

1968

74 620

1976

618

2054

617

2038

2039

613

11 32

1133

129

122

03 68

1134

1132

01 79

00 98

300

2188 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

(3)

(5)

(1) (1)

(2)

(4)

322

1337

(5) (3) (4)

(2)

2148

Brahmaniapal

325

489

2173

286

284

287

283

282

280

275

276

277

278

270

263

262

261

260

258

2135

223

222

221

208

207

206

205

204

202

201

200

198

197

196

195

185

184

183

180

Bampha

186

182

178

177

146

145

147

148

149

150

81 135

62 134

26 122

133

52 132

24 00

131

67 00

124

60 00

125

126

10 00

10 123

34 100

71 101

00 104

103

02 56 00

03 102

28 00

27 59

07 91 54

32 00

87 50

88 44

36 00

17 30

94 2205

82 20

2187

67 2179

77 11

28 00

95 1

74 2063

41 2060

2059

48 5047

04 2048

47 2045

10 2050

26 2039

16 1934

25 1935

15.

1941

00 1338

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 /PHALGUNA 15. 1931

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

(1) 1937

Bampha

Bampha 1940

1939

2328

1944

1945

1923

1850

(X)

1849

1848

1847

1853

1854

1844

1825

Bhingira

1824

1823

1829

1833

1832

1831

1811

1788

1713

1712

1711

1710

1707

1708

1709

313

311

2291

04 50

[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii ) | (2)

(4) (5)

(3)

2329

66 12

20 123

28 00

2333

65 2334

31 00

84 9

22 2285

2284

48 8

30 2

74 00

61 91

2265

02 2271

00.

533

64 532

(00

00 00

531

08 93 00

530

04 529

528

34 526

525

41 524

10 523

11 96 519

34 517

94 515

1-1

20 514

513

39 00

92 512

901

83 00

511

19 494

495

43 492

70 00

490

94 491

449

66 447

19 06

34 445

444

65 443

03 442

433

06 434

427

435

406

78 426

09 425

24 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(1)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

1339

(4) (5) (3)

(2)

98 00

399

Khandatiri

407

Bhingira

422

408

421

420

409

410

411

881

817

915

310

146

145

147

135

137

136

118

117

116

112

114

3057

Bramhapur

2670

3095

2671

2672

2669

3101

2668

2661

2659

3309

Khandatiri

02 93

3801

3308

3307

3305

3295

3296

3297

3299

3300

3291

3290

3289

398

3775

31 00

401

403

391

3738

295

371

368

3723

369

3715

370

375

576

575

573

574

569

564

565

566

548

543

544

545

546

547

696

698

697

699

700

693

690

689

686

688

687

707

680

708

709

714

3807

713

775

000

3702

781

05 48

780

778 1340

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[PART 11 -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5) Khandatiri

779

3646

Giridharaprasad

96 00

776

501

88 1103

32 00

1104

Karanda

3831

10 3770

3802

02 198

Giridharaprasad

3804

61 199

3805

77 00

228

3803

70 227

3808

95 229

3807

10 226

3809

63 230

3797

82 225

3815

41 00

272

3796

30 435

3817

37 438

3816

00 436

3837

65 430

3864

79 437

3867

52 429

3865

11 428

3866

35 426

3861

25 00

427

3862

01 425

3859

98 451

3858

20 450

3857

03 452

3913

65 454

14305

35 453

3909

06 421

39!

37 457

3911

65 00

3926

460

22 459

3927

98 -480

3933

78 481

3932

15 520

4279

64 00

521

3931

56 522

4278

68 523

4280

20 524

4276

85 519

4275

22 517

4272

71 516

4289

29 00

514

4273

88 00

495

4270

70 513

4271

89 512

4267

52 496

14222

38 00

498

426

39 500

4246

34 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(5)

(1)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

Karanda

4253

Karanda

4247

4252

4251

4248

5285

5238

5284

5287

5281

5283

5288

5282

5290

5312

5323

5329

5327

5326

03 27

5368

5367

5361

5365

5371

5366

5372

5373

5374

5377

5378

5379

5380

5381

5382

5385

5386

5387

5400

14302

5393

14303

14294

5394

5419

Thokara

5418

5423

5434

5433

5432

14236

1341

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

5429

5428

5427

5426

5425

14221

5902

5901

5813

13877

5812

5811

5810

5805

5557

5586

5558

5802

5803

02 60

5559

5563

5543

5564

58 5542

10 5740

5562

5565

5737

78 5568

5736

02 93 5738

5718

07 63

5719

5720

5712

37 5713

5710

5709

5716

5706

13863

5704

5705

5703

05 03

3913

3905

3910

87 3906

3907

3899 1342

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/ PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

(1)

(2)

(3) (4) (5)

(1) Thokara

3855

Thokara 3900

3942

3941

4176

3831

3830

3829

3828

3827

3621

3622

3623

3624

3620

3617

3618

09 40

3616

3615

3631

3613

3612

3610

3611

3767

320

319

318

00.

321

323

314

322

332

345

333

02 53

334

3926

335

343

336

344

3993

342

341

03 18

340

356

272

271

268

267

[PART 11 SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (2)

(3) (4) (5) 266

. 01

30 263

19 00

264

02 265

10 00

261

42 260

(2 238

Π 259

50 258

00 69 257

32 255

10 256

240

242

88 241

243

70 234

233

87 229

45 228

10 226

08 47 227

76 225

00.

78 224

33 150

39 152

-17

3973

83 153

17 4194

04 137

91 133

10 138

3970

51 63

25 64

15 00

19 70

78 67

74 00

3959

10 3958

01 69

19 00

03 .

32 46

(02

78 29

70 27

(X)

10 43

36 31

34 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(5)

(1)

(2)

(4)

(3)

(1)

Nau

3828

Nau

3825

3826

3824

3821

3822

3823

3677

3678

3679

3680

3681

3682

04'

3700

3699

3696

3697

3636

3635

3637

3634

3652

3632

3631

3621

3602

3605

3604

3607

3608

5456

3609

-3617

Tarkabeda

3615

3614

2823

3015

3014

2824

04,

3011

3012

3010

3036

3008

3037

3007

5339

3038

3039

3040

688 GI /1012

1343

(5) (2)

(3) (4)

3043

11 00

3044

53 3256

80 3059

3060

63 00

3092

80 3091

07 00

3090

10 00

3255

87 00

3088

03 3095

79 00

3087

3096

3097

3086

3098

16 3130

3085

31 00

3131

42 00

3132

64 3150

07 00

3151

10 00

3149

3148

10 3147

42 00

3166

23 3165

06 00

3167

83 3168

3169

3170

5442

38 758

51 00

3252

3251

67 00

3244

10 3247

32 3245

50 4337

30 3243

3242

06 3238

3237

95 3236

3234

3231

59 3233

3232

80 3192

3181 1344

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 /PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

(5)

(3) (4)

(1) (2)

(1)

Tarkabeda

3180

3182

3178

3179

3176

3174

3175

3171

3170

3146

3147

3145

3151

3152

3139

07 48

4275

4276

3128

3127

3123

3122

3415

3121

3120

3416

3417

4291

3418

3419

3435

3434

4288

3426

3038

3034

3035

2795

2794

2798

2797

2803

2807

2802

2804

2805

2806

2768

2766

2765

2767

[PART 11 SEC. 3 ( ii) |

(5) (2)

(3) (4)

73 2764

38 2761

2754

41 2755

58 2756

28 2753

06 2750

2751

29 2748

2747

33 00

75 2746

44 2744

2905

47 2906

84 2908

72 2907

2909

2912

50 2913

15 2922

2924

23 2929

06 2928

88 2932

13 2927

2933

47 2926

59 2524

2523

15 2518

89 2520

2521

51 2519

2190

2189

10 2191

2173

2177

18 2174

23 2185

2184

98 2183

2179

31 2178

2181

2180

1563

1565

47 1566

1567

02 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(5)

(1)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

Kadala

1570

Tarkabeda

05 94

1569

1572

1573

1574-

1555

1553

1461

1469

1462

1463

4384

1464

1532

1529

1528

1522

1519

1518

1516

1515

1514

1507

1499

1506

1500

1501

1505

4373

1504

1503

1486

1488

1487

2147

Kadala

2179

2180

2178

2187

Badamuna.

2188

2173

2191

2190

2192

2193

2194

2201

2200

2198

2199

1345

(4) (5) (2)

(3)

36 2139

02 80 2084

10 2085

10 00

2083

2067

2069

24 00

2070

01 2068

2021

61 2011

66 2019

65 2020

1992

2030

2029

2031

1991

2032

2035

2036

1973

1923

( 7

1972

27 1927

1928

92 1931

1971

1932

04 1935

1936

1937

(X)

1940

1942

1944

1943

1945

1946

1872

1873

917

1442

915

1441

62 1440

1439

1506

914

913

58 912

911 1346

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6, 2010/ PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

(2)

(1)

(3) (4) (5)

(1)

970

Badamunda

966

971

972

1493

1271

973

981

979

978

980

977

976

467

466

464

1501

[PART 11 -SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

(3)

(2)

(4) (5) 92

78 39

92 25

48 38

28 29

97 18

40 30

70 00

00 46 9

14 8

61 2

00 00

10 00

335

Naraharipur

463

462

(0)

461

1298

475

459

476

477

1365

1364

453

452

451

491

1554

1380

141

142

336

58 00

10 398

87 333

394

59 334

(02

394

000

59 393

58 00

392

87 00

97 391

313

314

60 312

49 00

311

83 310

309

10 308

58 00

408

63 00

(0) 1553

Paikpurunakota

139

143

145

158

03.

157

124

126

131

125

1388

122

26 90

1554

10 1568

17 1559

1567

81 00

1560

06 2069

02 .

1562

1561

65 00

23 1500

1498

77 1497

06 00

1496

59 1470

10 00

1471

65 1472

92 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

(5)

(2)

(3) (4)

(1) (1)

1463

1347 (2)

(3) (4) (5)

82 00

1251

Paikpurunakota

1473

1474

1461

1409

1408

1407

1410

1411

1459

1458

1457

1432

1424

1422

1423

1421

1395

1396

2095

1393

1385

1384

1883

1381

1382

1380

1378

1377

1375

1376

1122

1128

1129

1130

1131

1243

1244

1241-

1242

2056

1245

2055

1234

1233

1406

2125

52 1262

2110

253

52 2108

2109

25 00

259

10 298

260

43 00

297

28 261

91 00

64 262

265

12 00

267

268

208

13 269

270

271

272

273

156

157

2115

155

153

41 2206

30 65

16 92

95 98

37 59

19 64

56 63

17 68

95 69

28 840

73 1616

Brahmanpurunakot

1247

000

1249

1248

1252

10 313

-00

314

1693

12 60 315 1348

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 /PHALGUNA 15, 1931

(3)

(5)

(4)

(1) (2)

(1)

[PART 11 SEC. 3 ( ii )] (3) (4) (5) (2)

1014

Nandeilo

317

Brahmanpurunakot

318

316

329

330

350

328

332

327

16:46

1647

08 88

349

334

335

176

175

177

174

172

171

1618

167

166

119

121

122

1825

118

129

117

114

113

1653

07.

1654

04 08

32 251

217

218

85 220

18 00

89 221

222

57 223

210

10 224

209

04 208

41 00

207

202

57 00

204

82 205

206

82 203

170

18 171

172

70 178

177

02 46

150

149

04 148

147

10 145

146

90 153

59 979

08 83 111

19 84

04 81

73 87

000

14 75

15 980

00.

3311

Sanjapada

3377

3310

00 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(2)

(4) (5)

(1)

(3)

(1)

3378

1349

(5)

(4)

(2)

(3)

35 82

Panaghudughuda

Sanjapada

3312

3376

3375

3316

3317

3421

3318

3322

00'

3323

3315

3352

3324

3334

3335

3332

3330

3329

3340

800

Panaghudughuda

293

292

110

105

106

107

104

103

102

122

126

127

128

Amana

129

130

131

251

252

253

250

249

248

06 43

134

10 00

881

136

135

65 137

880

138

15 00

139

07 140

79 00

141

95 00

(X)

143

46 142

00 00

145

38 00

146

00.

147

10 00

181

182

183

15 00

184

185

54 00

186

03 193

194

360

38 00

359

366

89 357

356

34 801

367

369

2385

17 2217

60 2210

39 2192

27 2190

2182

2179

88 627

09 626

[No. R- 25011 / 1 /2010 -OR -I ] B. K. DATTA , Under Secy.

1350

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6, 2010/ PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[ Part II Sec . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च , 2010

का. आ. 674.- पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962का 50 ) के नियम 2 (क ) के अन्तर्गत , मैसर्स रिलायंस गैस ट्रान्सपोर्टेशन इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड (आर.जी.टी. आई.एल. ) के द्वारा महाराष्ट्र राज्य में प्राकृतिक गैस पाइपलाइन विछाई जाने हेतु सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कार्यों का निर्वहन करने के. लिए , भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की , भारत के राजपत्र दिनांक 22 जनवरी , 2005 को प्रकाशित , अधिसूचना का ० आ ० 259 दिनांक 18 जनवरी , 2005 द्वारा प्राधिकृत , मैं , डी.एस. धोत्रे, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) नियमावली , 1963 के नियम 4 के उप - नियम ( 1 ) के नीचे दी गई व्याख्या ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत अधिकारों के अनुपालन में, मैसर्सआर.जी.टी.आई.एल . , जिसमें यथास्थित , उस क्षेत्र में भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार निहित किया गया है और उस क्षेत्र में पाइपलाइन का स्वामित्व निहित है , के परामर्श से , संलग्न अनुसूची के स्तंभ 4 में महाराष्ट्र राज्य के लातुर , उस्मानाबाद और सोलापूर जिले में यथा उल्लेखित प्राकृतिक गैस पाइपलाइन विछाए जाने के प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीखों की घोषणा करता हूँ ।

तहसिल: निलंगा

ग्राम का नाम

क्र. स.

1301

मसलगा ( वुजुर्ग )

तहसिलः उस्मानाबाद

अनुसूची

राज्यः महाराष्ट्र जिला: लातुर

प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख

धारा 6 ( 1 ) की का. आ. संख्या एवं दिनांक

05/04/2008

दिनांक

08/04/2005

जिला: उस्मानाबाद

आंवेहोळ

1301

2695

2904(अ) 2

1301

कौडगाव

2695

2904(अ)

871 तहसिल: परांडा

राज्यः महाराष्ट्र

31/12/2008

दिनांक

08/04/2005

20/09/2007

दिनांक

06/12/2008

दिनांक

08/04/2005

30/04/2009

20/09/2007

दिनांक

06/12/2008

दिनांक

06/04/2009

दिनांक

जिला: उस्मानाबाद

1182

राजुरीचीवाडी

3167 2

1182

डोंजा

3107

3350

2843(अ) 3

1182

आलेश्वर

3167

3350

2843(अ)

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र दिनांक

29/03/2005

29/02/2008

22/10/2007

दिनांक

29/03/2005

30/11/2009

दिनांक

07/01/2008

दिनांक

22/10/2007

दिनांक

16/12/2008

दिनांक

04/11/2009

दिनांक

29/03/2005

30/11/2009

दिनांक

22/10/2007

दिनांक

16/12/2008

दिनांक

04/11/2009

दिनांक 1351

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र जिला: सोलापूर

तहसिलः करमाळा

1182

खांबेवाडी

3167

3350

1182

धायखिंडी

3167

3350

3240(अ)

1182

पोथरे

3167

3350

1182 4

वडगाव(खुर्द)

3167

3350

2843(अ)

3240(अ)

31/12/2008 29/03/2005

दिनांक

22/10/2007

दिनांक

16/12/2008

दिनांक

31/12/2009 29/03/2005

दिनांक

22/10/2007

दिनांक

16/12/2008

दिनांक

15/12/2009

दिनांक

31/12/2008 29/03/2005

दिनांक

07/01/2008

दिनांक

22/10/2007

दिनांक

16/12/2008

दिनांक

31/12/2009 29/03/2005

दिनांक

22/10/2007

दिनांक

16/12/2008

दिनांक

04/11/2009

दिनांक

15/12/2009

दिनांक

पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962की धारा 17 के अंर्तगत संरचित पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) नियम, 1963 के नियम 4के अंर्तगत भारत सरकार के राजपत्रमें प्रकाशनार्थ-

[फा सं. एल.-14014/12/2010- जी.पी. ]

स्नेह प्रभा मदान , अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 5th March , 2010

S. O. 674. In pursuance of powers conferred by Explanation 1 in sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Rules , 1963 , I , D.S. Dhotre , authorised by Government of India , Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas vide Notification S.O. 259 dated 18th January, 2005 (published in the Gazette of India on 22nd January, 2005 ) under Section 2( a) of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) to perform the functions of Competent Authority for laying natural gas pipelines by M/ s Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited ( RGTIL) in the State of Maharashtra, in consultation with M/ s RGTIL , to whom the Right of User in land in that area has been vested and in whom the ownership of pipeline in that area vests , hereby declare the dates , mentioned in Column 4 of the Schedule annexed herewith , as the dates of termination of RoU operation in Districts Latur , Osmanabad and Solapur in the State of Maharashtra .

688GI /10--13 1352

Tahsil : Ausa

Village

Sr. No.

1301 Masalga(Bujurg )

Tahsil : Osmanabad

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[Part II--Sec . 3 (ii) ] Schedule

District: Latur

State: Maharashtra

S.O. No. & Date of Notification Under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6

Date of Termination of Operation 3

Date

08/04/2005

05/04/2008

District : Osmanabad

Ambehol

1301

2695

2904( E) 2

1301

Kaudgaon

2695

2904( E)

871 Tahsil: Paranda

State: Maharashtra Date

08/04/2005

31/12/2008 Date

20/09/2007

Date

06/12/2008

Date

08/04/2005

30/04/2009 Date

20/09/2007

Date

06/12/2008

Date

06/04/2009

District: Osmanabad

1182 Rajurichiwadi

3167 2

1182

Donja

3167

3350

2843( E) 3

Aleshwar

1182

3167

3350

2843 ( E) Tahsil : Karmala

State: Maharashtra Date

29/03/2005

29/02/2008

Date

22/10/2007

Date

29/03/2005

30/11/2009

Date

07/01/2008

Date

22/10/2007

Date

16/12/2008

Date

04/11/2009

Date

29/03/2005

30/11/2009

Date

22/10/2007

Date

16/12/2008

Date

04/11/2009

State: Maharashtra District: Solapur

Khambewadi

1182

3167

3350 2

1182 Dhaykhindi

3167

3350

3240( E) 3

Pothare

1182

3167

3350 Date

29/03/2005

31/12/2008

Date

22/10/2007

Date

16/12/2008

Date

29/03/2005

31/12/2009

Date

22/10/2007

Date

16/12/2008

Date

15/12/2009

Date

29/03/2005

31/12/2008

Date

07/01/2008

Date

22/10/2007

Date

16/12/2008 1353

भारत का राजपत्र मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1182 4

Wadgaon(Khurd)

3167

3350

2843(E)

3240( E)

31/12/2009 29/03/2005

Date

22/10/2007

Date

16/12/2008

Date

04/11/2009

Date

15/12/2009

Date

To be published under Ruie 4 of the P & MP (ARUL) Rules1963, framed under Section 17 of P & MP (ARUL) Act, 1962 in official Gazette of India.

[F. No. L- 14014/12/2010 -GP] SNEH P. MADAN , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च, 2010

का. आ. 675.-पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) के नियम 2 (क ) के अन्तर्गत , मैसर्स रिलायंस गैस ट्रान्सपोर्टेशन इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड (आर.जी.टी.आई. एल . ) के द्वारा महाराष्ट्र राज्य में प्राकृतिक गैस पाइपलाइन विछाई जाने हेतु सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कार्यो का निर्वहन करने के लिए , भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की, भारत के राजपत्र दिनांक 22 जनवरी , 2005 को प्रकाशित, अधिसूचना का० आ० 259 दिनांक 18 जनवरी , 2005 द्वारा पदस्थापित, मैं, एस . डी . भिसे, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) नियमावली, 1963 के नियम 4 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के नीचे दी गई व्याख्या (1 ) के अन्तर्गत अधिकारों के अनुपालन में, मैसर्स आर.जी.टी.आई.एल. , जिसमें यथास्थित, उस क्षेत्र में भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार निहित किया गया है और उस क्षेत्र में पाइपलाइन का स्वामित्व निहित है , के परामर्श से, संलग्न अनुसूची के स्तंभ 4 में महाराष्ट्र राज्य के ठाणे जिले में यथा उल्लेखित प्राकृतिक गैस पाइपलाइन विछाए जाने के प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीखों की घोपणा करता हूँ ।

तहसिल: कल्याण

ग्राम का नाम

क्र. स.

1180 1 दहागाव

1180 2 घोटसई

1180 3 म्हसकल

1180 4 उतणे

1180 5 गुरावली

747(अ)

254

1180 6 निंबोली

1180 7 गय

1180 8 ओझर्ली

अनुसूची

राज्यः महाराष्ट्र जिला: ठाणे

प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख

धारा 6 (1) की का . आ . संख्या एवं दिनांक

31-03-2008 29-03-2005

दिनांक

31-03-2008 29-03-2005

दिनांक

31-03-2008 29-03-2005

दिनांक

31-03-2008 29-03-2005

दिनांक

29-03-2005

दिनांक

31-03-2008 08-05-2007

दिनांक

02-04-2008

दिनांक

31-03-2008 29-03-2005

दिनांक

31-03-2008 29-03-2005

दिनांक

31-05-2008 29-03-2005

दिनांक 1354

तहसिल: तलासरी

1 वडवली

1180 2

1180 ठाकरपाडा

1180 इभारपाडा

1180 सुतारपाडा

तहसिल: अंबरनाथ

1 शिल

2416

2416 2 इदगाव

341(अ)

253 3 कान्होर

2416

253 4

2416 बदलापुर

5 मोनिवली

2416 6 वरंजाड

2416 7

2416 अंबेशिव बुदुक

253 तहसिल: भिवंडी

1 पडघे

2416 2

2416 अर्जुनली

2416 कुरूंद

2486(अ) 4 दाभाड

2416 5 गोंन्दावली

2416 तहसिल: वाडा

1 मेट

1792 2 विजयगड

1.792

1537 3 बिलोशी

1792

2486(अ) 4

1792 अम्बिस्ते खु

5 भोपिवली

1792 6 ब्राम्हणगांव

1792 तहसिल: विक्रमगड

1792 1 कुझे

2 भोपाली

1792 3. तलवली

1792

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/PHALGUNA 15, 1931

[Part 11 -Sec . 3 ( ii) ] 3

जिला: ठाणे

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

दिनांक

29-03-2005

30-04-2008

दिनांक

29-03-2005

30-04-2008

दिनांक

29-03-2005

30-04-2008

29-03-2005

दिनांक

30-04-2008

जिला: ठाणे

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

दिनांक

04-07-2005

31-03-2008

04-07-2005

दिनांक

09-03-2007

दिनांक

31-03-2008

दिनांक

04-02-2008

04-07-2005

दिनांक

31-03-2008

दिनांक

04-02-2008

04-07-2005

दिनांक

31-03-2008

04-07-2005

दिनांक

31-03-2008

04-07-2005

दिनांक

31-03-2008

04-07-2005

दिनांक

31-03-2008

दिनांक

04-02-2008

जिला: ठाणे

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

दिनांक

04-07-2005

31-03-2008

दिनांक

04-07-2005

31-05-2008

दिनांक

04-07-2005

31-10-2008

14-10-2008

दिनांक

04-07-2005

31-05-2008

दिनांक

04-07-2005

31-05-2008

जिला:ठाणे

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

दिनांक

09-05-2005

31-05-2008

09-05-2005

दिनांक

31-05-2008

21-05-2007

दिनांक

09-05-2005

31-10-2008

14-10-2008

दिनांक

09-05-2005

31-05-2008

09-05-2005

दिनांक

20-05-2008

दिनांक

09-05-2005

20-05-2008

जिला:ठाणे

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

दिनांक

09-05-2005

20-05-2008

दिनांक

09-05-2005

20-05-2008

दिनांक

09-05-2005

20-05-2008 1355

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

तहसिल: डहाणु

1181 1 तवे

1181 2 कोल्हान

1181 3 घोल

1181 4 भराड

1181 5 चारोटी

1181 6 विव्हलवेढे

1181 7 अवधानी

1181 8 दहिगांव

1181 9 देऊर

1181 10 सामवंद

1181 11 ब्राम्हणवाडी

1181 12 दापचरी

तहसिल: पालघर

1181 1 ब्रहाणपुर

1181 2 सोमट

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला:ठाणे

28-02-2008

29-03-2005

दिनांक

28-02-2008

29-03-2005

दिनांक

28-02-2008

29-03-2005

दिनांक

28-02-2008

29-03-2005

दिनांक

28-02-2008

29-03-2005

दिनांक

28-02-2008

29-03-2005

दिनांक

28-02-2008

29-03-2005

दिनांक

31-03-2008

29-03-2005

दिनांक

31-03-2008

29-03-2005

दिनांक

31-03-2008

29-03-2005

दिनांक

31-03-2008

29-03-2005

दिनांक

30-04-2008

29-03-2005

दिनांक

राज्य: महाराष्ट्र

जिला: ठाणे

28-02-2008

29-03-2005

दिनांक

28-02-2008

29-03-2005

दिनांक

पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962की धारा 17 के अंर्तगत संरचित पेट्रोलियम और ग्खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) नियम , 1963 के नियम 4के अंर्तगत भारत सरकार के राजपत्रमै प्रकाशनार्थ.

[फा सं. एल.-14014/10/ 2010 - जी.पी. ] स्नेह प्रभा मदान , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 5th March , 2010

S. O. 675 . pursuance of powers conferred by Explanation 1 in sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Rules , 1963 , I , S. D. Bhise , appointed by Government of India , Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas vide Notification S.O. 259 dated 18th January , 2005 ( published in the Gazette of India on 22nd January , 2005) under Section 2 ( a) of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) to perform the functions of Competent Authority for laying natural gas pipelines by M / s Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited ( RGTIL) in the State of Maharashtra, in consultation with M/ s RGTIL , to whom the Right of User in land in that area has been vested and in whom the ownership of pipeline in that area vests , hereby declare the dates , mentioned in Column 4 of the Schedule annexed herewith, as the dates of termination of RoU operation in District Thane in the State of Maharashtra .

1356

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[Part 11-Sec . 3( ii) ]

Schedule

Tahsil: Kalyan

District : Thane

State: Maharashtra Sr. No

Village

S.O. No. & Date of Notification Under sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6

Date of Termination of Operation

1 Dahagaon

1180

Date

29-03-2005

31-03-2008

2Ghotsai

1180

Date

29-03-2005

31-03-2008

3 Mhaskal

1180

Date

29-03-2005

31-03-2008

4 Utane

1180

Date

29-03-2005

31-03-2008

5 Guravali

1180

Date

29-03-2005

747( E)

Date

08-05-2007

31-03-2008

254

Date

02-04-2008

6 Nimboli

1180

Date

29-03-2005

31-03-2008

7 Raye

1180

Date

29-03-2005

31-03-2008

8 Ozarli

1180

Date

29-03-2005

31-05-2008

Tahsil : Talasari

District: Thane

State: Maharashtra 1 Vadavali

1180

Date

29-03-2005

30-04-2008

2Thakarpada

1180

Date

29-03-2005

30-04-2008

3 Ibharapada

1180

Date

29-03-2005

30-04-2008

4 Sutarpada

1180

Date

29-03-2005

30-04-2008

Tahsil : Ambernath

District: Thane

State: Maharashtra 1 Shil

2416

Date

04-07-2005

31-03-2008

2Indgaon

2416

Date

04-07-2005

341(E)

Date

09-03-2007

31-03-2008

253

Date

04-02-2008

3 Kanhore

2416

Date

04-07-2005

31-03-2008

253

Date

04-02-2008

4 Badlapur

2416

Date

04-07-2005

31-03-2008

5 Sonivali

2416

Date

04-07-2005

31-03-2008

6 Yeranjad

2416

Date

04-07-2005

31-03-2008

7 Ambeshiv Budruk

2416

Date

04-07-2005

31-03-2008

253

Date

04-02-2008

Tahsil: Bhiwandi

District: Thane

State: Maharashtra 1 Padghe

2416

Date

04-07-2005

31-03-2008

2 Arjauanli

2416

Date

04-07-2005

31-05-2008

3 Kurund

2416

Date

04-07-2005

31-10-2008

2486(E)

Date

14-10-2008

4 Dabhade

2416

Date

04-07-2005

31-05-2008

5 Gondravali

2416

Date

04-07-2005

31-05-2008 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1357

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

3 Tahsil: Wada

District: Thane

1 Met

1792

Date

1792

Date 2 Vijaygad

1537

Date 3 Biloshi

1792

Date

2486(E)

4 Ambiste Ku

Date

1792

Date 5 Bhopivali

6 Brahmangaon

1792

Date

District : Thane

Tahsil: Vikramgad

1 Kuraje

1792

2Bhopoli

1792

Date 3 Talavali

1792

Date Tahsil: Dahanu

District: Thane

1 Tave

1181

Date 2 Kolhan

1181

3Ghol

1181

Date 4 Bharad

1181

Date 5 Charoti

1181

Date 6 Vivalvedhe

1181

Date

1181

7 Avdhani

Date

Date 8 Dhigaon

1181

9 Devur

1181

10 Sasvanda

1181

Date 11 Bramhanwadi

1181

12Dabchari

1181

Date

District : Thane

Tahsil: Palghar

1 Brahanpur

1181

Date 2 Somate

1181

Date

Act, 1962 in official Gazette of India .

State: Maharashtra 09-05-2005

31-05-2008

09-05-2005

31-05-2008

21-05-2007

09-05-2005

31-10-2008

14-10-2008

09-05-2005

31-05-2008

09-05-2005

20-05-2008-

09-05-2005

20-05-2008

State: Maharashtra

Date 09-05-2005

20-05-2008

09-05-2005

20-05-2008

09-05-2005

20-05-2008

State: Maharashtra 29-03-2005

28-02-2008

Date 29-03-2005

28-02-2008

29-03-2005

28-02-2008

29-03-2005

28-02-2008

29-03-2005

28-02-2008

29-03-2005

28-02-2008

29-03-2005

28-02-2008

31-03-2008

29-03-2005

Date 29-03-2005

31-03-2008

29-03-2005

31-03-2008

Date 29-03-2005

31-03-2008

29-03-2005

30-04-2008

State: Maharashtra 29-03-2005

28-02-2008

29-03-2005

28-02-2008

To be published under Rufe 4 of the P & MP ( ARUL)

Rules1963, framed under Section 17 of P & MP ( ARUL)

[ F. No. L -14014/10/2010 -GP] SNEH P. MADAN , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 5 मार्च , 2010

का.1.आ. 676. - पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) के नियम 2 (क) के अन्तर्गन , मैगर्स रिलांयस गैस ट्रांसपोर्टेशन इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड (आर.जी.टी.आई.एल. ) के द्वारा आन्ध प्रदेश गज्य में प्राकृतिक गैस पाइपलाइन विछाई जाने हेतु सक्षम प्राधिकारी के कार्यो का निर्वहन करने के लिए , भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की, भारत के राजपत्र दिनांक 26 अप्रैल , 2007 को प्रकाशित, अधिसूचना का.आ. 653 (अ) दिनांक 25 अप्रैल, 2007 द्वारा पदस्थापित, मै , एम.ए. गफ्फार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) नियमावली, 1963 के नियम 4 के उप - नियम ( 1 ) के नीचे दी गई व्याख्या ( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत अधिकारों के अनुपालन में, मैसर्स आर.जी.टी.आई.एल. , जिसमें यथास्थित, उस क्षेत्र में भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार निहित किया गया है और उस क्षेत्र में पाइपलाइन का स्वामित्व निहित है, के परामर्श मे, संलग्न अनुसूची के स्तम्भ 4 में आन्ध्र प्रदेश गज्य के कृष्णा जिला में यथा उल्लेखित प्राकृतिक गैस पाइपलाइन विछाए जाने के प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीखों की घोषणा करता हूँ । 1358

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/ PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[Part II Sec. 3 (ii) )

अनुसूची

राज्य आन्ध प्रदेश

मंडल/ तेहसिल/ तालुक जी. कोंडूरू

जिला कृष्णा

ग्राम का नाम

क. स.

धारा 6 ( 1 ) की का . आ . संख्या एवं दिनांक

प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख

दिनांक 22-05-2009

15-01-2010

1330(अ)

1 चेवुटूरू

दिनांक 01-07-2009

1619(अ) }

दिनांक 03-11-2009

2845(अ)

10-01-2010

दिनांक 22-05-2009

1330(अ)

2 आतुकूरू

दिनांक 01-07-2009

1619(अ) }

दिनांक 03-11-2009

2845( अ)

15-12-2009

दिनांक 22-05-2009

3 जी । कोंडूरु

1330(अ)

दिनांक 01-07-2009

1619(अ)

दिनांक 03-11-2009

2845(अ)

4 पिनापाका

10-12-2009

दिनांक 22-05-2009

1330(अ)

दिनांक 01-07-2009

1619(अ)

दिनांक 03-11-2009

2845(अ)

20-11-2009

दिनांक 22-05-2009

1330(अ)

5 कवलूरू

दिनांक 01-07-2009

1619(अ)

दिनांक 03-11-2009

2845(अ)

राज्य: आन्ध्र प्रदेश

जिला:कृष्णा

मंडल/ तेहमिल/ तालुक इब्रहीमपट्नम

1 कोंडपल्ली

08-01-2010

दिनांक 22-05-2009

1330(अ)

दिनांक 01-07-2009

1619(अ)

दिनांक 03-11-2009

2845(अ)

पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 की धारा 17 के अन्तर्गत संग्चित पेट्रोलिय और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) नियम , 1963 के नियम 4 के अन्तर्गत भारत सरकार के राजपत्रमें प्रकाशनार्थः

[फा सं. एल.- 14014/11/2010 - जी.पी. ]

स्नेह प्रभा मदान, अवर सचिव 1359 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 5th March, 2010

S. O. 676. In pursuance of powers conferred by Explanation 1 in sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Rules , 1963 , I, M.A.Gaffar , appointed by Government of India , Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas vide Notification S.O.653 ( E ) dated 25th April , 2007 ( published in the Gazette of India on 26th April , 2007) under Section 2( a) of the Petroleum & Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) to perform the functions of Competent Authority for laying natural gas pipelines by M/ s Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited (RGTIL) in the State of Andhra Pradesh , in consultation with M/ s RGTIL , to whom the Right of User in the land in that area has been vested and in whom the ownership of the pipeline in that area vests , hereby declare the dates , mentioned in Column 4 of the Schedule annexed herewith, as the dates of termination of RoU operation in District Krishna in the State of Andhra Pradesh.

Schedule

District : Krishna

State: Andhra Pradesh

Mandal/Tehsil /Taluk : G.Konduru

Village

SI . No.

S.O. No. and Date of Notification under sub - section (1 ) of Section 6

Date of Termination of Operation

Date 22-05-2009

15-01-2010 1 Chevuturu

1330(E)

Date 01-07-2009

1619(E)

Date 03-11-2009

2845 ( E)

2 Atukuru

Date 22-05-2009

10-01-2010

1330 (E)

Date 01-07-2009

1619(E)

Date 03-11-2009

2845( E)

15-12-2009 3 G.Konduru

Date 22-05-2009

1330(E)

Date 01-07-2009

1619(E)

Date 03-11-2009

2845 (E)

10-12-2009

Date 22-05-2009

1330(E)

4Pinapaka

Date 01-07-2009

1619(E)

Date 03-11-2009

2845 (E)

20-11-2009

Date 22-05-2009

5 Kavaluru

1330(E)

Date 01-07-2009

1619 (E )

Date 03-11-2009

}

2845 (E)

District : Krishna

State: Andhra Pradesh

Mandal / Tehsil /Taluk: Ibrahimpatnam

08-01-2010

Date 22-05-2009

LKondanalli

Date 01-07-2009

1330(E) 1619(E)

Date 03-11-2009

2845(E)

}

To be published under Rule 4 of the P& MP (ARUL ) Rules , 1963 , framed under Section 17 of P & MP ( ARUL) Act , 1962 in official Gazette of India.

688 GI/10--14

[ F. No. L - 14014/ 11 /2010 -GP] SNEH PADAN , Under Secy.

1360

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/PHALGUNA 15, 1931

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii ) ] श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 2 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 677.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स स्पाइस जैट लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद मे 'केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं. -1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 68/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकारं को2-2-10 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -11012/26/2006- आईआर(सीएम-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

changed its name with Spice Jet Limited which is still working. The management has not given his wages w.e.f. 1-11-2001 to 1-1-2002 , when his services were terminated without any notice, in this way the management violated the provisions of section 25 - F of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( in short the Act) . The workman sent a demand notice dated 26-6-05 claiming reinstatement with back wages and continuity of service , to which the management gave no reply or reinstated him . However, the management appointed new persons and 50 labours of the contractor were also appointed. The workman filed his claim before theConciliation Officer which ended in failure . On failure of conciliation proceedings the appropriate Government referred the following industrial dispute vide Order No. L -11012/26/ 2006 - IR ( CM - 1 ) dated 28-8-2006 , with the followingterms :

New Delhi , the 2nd February , 2010

"Whether the action of the management of Modi Luft/ Royal Airways / Spice Jet Ltd. in terminating the services of Shri Jaipal , S/ o Shri Prabhu Dayal w.e.f. 1-1-02 isjust, fair and legal ? If not , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ? " S.O. 677.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref . No. 68/2006) of the Central Government Ind strial Tribunal No. 1 , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . Spice Jet Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 2-2-10 .

2. Management filed written statement pleading that statement of claim is liable to be dismissed since the workman had never been appointed by the management of Spice Jet Ltd.

[No. L- 11012/26/2006 - IR ( CM - 1 ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 1, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX , DELHI

I.D. No. 68/2006

3. Workmen examined himself in support ofhis case . During the course of his cross examination he admits that no appointment letter was issued to him by M / s . Modi Luft.Hejoined Modi Luft in December , 94. He knows that Modi Luft has been closed in 1996. He stated that his wages were paid in cash by officers of Modi Luft . He admitted that he never worked with Spice Jet Limited. He wrote letters tothe management in the year 2005 assailing his termination .

Shri Jai Pal S /o Shri Prabhu Dayal , Through Shri P.L. Srivastava , CB -280 , Ring Road , Naraina, New Delhi - 28

....Workman

Versus

the General Manager , M/s. Spice Jet Ltd. , Pl . No. 319 , Phase- IV , Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon , Haryana

....Management

AWARD

A claim has been made by Jai Pal , pleading that he joined services in 1994 as Technician Man at last salary of Rs . 7000 PM . He was initially appointed at Modi Luft Ltd. (M.G. Express Ltd. ) at 98 Hemkunt Tower , Nehru Place , New Delhi . Later on he was transferred to M/ s . Royal Airways without any written notice . The managenent has

4. Management Examined Shri Sanjay Sharma to prove its case . He proved permit Ex . MW 1/2 . issued by theDirector General Civil Aviation . He proved copy of the resolution Ex. MW 1/3 . He proved press release published in Economic Times in respect of change of name of the management as Ex . MW1 /4 . Permit of the company was renewed vide Ex . MW1 /5 . He proved document in respect of change of name of the company , issuedby Registrar of Companies , Delhi as Ex . MW 1/6 . During the course of cross examination he admitted that earlier name of the company wasModi Luft. He projected that since the workman is not employee of the management hence question of his reinstatement in service does not arise . He submitted that as per record no letters were written to the workman when he left the job in November , 96. He denied that services of the workman were terminated on 1-1-2002 . He projected that Royal Airways was purchased by Spice Jet Limited in February , 2005. He denied that Modi Luft as well as Royal Airways were never taken over and their names were changed fromtime to time .

1361 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

services . Under these circumstances , the workman is not entitled to any relief. His claim is dismissed . An award is accordingly passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication.

DR. R.K. YADAV , Presiding Officer 5. I have heard Shri Anil Rajput , authorized representative for the workman and Shri Kapil Sankhla , authorized representative of the management . The management filed written submissions too. Shri Rajput had replied those submissions orally . My findings on the issues involved in the controversy are as follows :

Dated: 14-1-2010

नई दिल्ली , 8 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 678.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक आफ बड़ौदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 33 आफ 1995 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 08-02-2010 कोप्राप्त हुआ था ।

6. Workman admits that Modi Luft was closed in the year 1996. He further admits that no appointment letter was issued to him by M/s Modi Luft. He projects that he never worked with M /s Spice Jet Limited . According to him he was working with Modi Luft till 1st of January , 2002, when his services were terminated . When facts projected by the claimant were appreciated , it emerge over the record that there is no substance in it. When Modi Luftwas closed in 1996 , it does not lie in the month of the claimant that he served with M/ s Modi Luft till Ist of January, 2002. Therefore , it is obvious that facts projected by the claimant are unfounded .

[सं. एल-12012/ 297/94- आईआर ( बो-11 ) ] यू. एस. पाण्डेय , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 8th February , 2010

S.O. 678. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 33 of 1995) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court Kanpur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Bank of Baroda and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 8-02-2010 .

No. L- 12012 /297/94 - IR ( B - II ) ] U. S. PANDEY , Desk Officer 8. Out of facts projected by Shri Sanjay Sharma it cametolight that Airline business of M / s Modi Luft came to an end on 19-11-96 . Airline business was not done by the management till 23-5-05 , the date when airline operations commenced again . Company was inoperative between 1996 to May, 05. Airline operations were relaunched by the company with the name of Spice Jet on 23-10-05 , after issue of new permitby the Director General Civil Aviation on 17-5-05 . Spice Jet Limited came into existence w.e.f. 23-10-05 , consequent to the change in the name of the management . Under these circumstances , there is no substance in the claim put for forward by the workman that he worked with the management till Ist of January , 2002. It isevident that his service came to an end on 19-11-96 and thereafter he fabricated a story to the effect that he worked with the management till 1-1-02.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI RAM PARKASH , HJS , PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT , KANPUR

Industral Dispute No. 33 of 1995

BETWEEN

Shiv Kumar son of late Ram Charan , House No. 281 , Sagar Gate, Jhansi.

9. When permit to operate scheduled air transport service was not renewed by the director General Civil Aviation on 19-11-96 , it cannot be said that the services of the workman were dispensed with on 1st of January , 2002 . The management had proved its permit dated 20-11-94 , its renewal dated 17-5-05 , copy of resolution dated 28-2-2001 , copy of press release appeared in Economic Times issue dated 3-1-01 , copy of permit to change scheduled air transport service ( passenger ) dated 9-5-06 , copy of fresh certificate of incorporation , consequent upon the change ofthe name . All these documents lend support to the facts projected by the management .

And Branch Manager, Bank ofBaroda , Main Branch , Jogan Bagh Jhansi .

AWARD

1. Central Government MOL , New Delhi , vide notification No. L - 12012/ 297/94 - IR ( B - II ) dated 28-02-95 .

10. When air transport operations of M /s . Modi Luft came to an end on 19-11-96 and airlines operations were relaunched on 23-05-05 , under these circumstances the reference made by the appropriate Government is found to be mechanical without application of mind . Justification lies in the action of the management , when services of the claimant were dispensed with on 19-11-96 , on account of non renewal of permit to operate scheduled air transport 1362

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[PART 11--SEC . 3 (ii ) ] has referred the followingdispute to this tribunal for adjudication -

certificate. While terminating his services with effect from 29-07-96, the opposite party has violated the mandatory provisions of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. It is stated that the action of the opposite party is illegal , improper , malafide and vindictive beside a glaring instance of unfair labour practice .

Whether the action of the management of Bank of Baroda, Jhansi in terminating the services of Sri Shiv Kumar, peon w.e.f. 29-7-94 is legal and justified ? If not to what relief is the said workman entitled ?

6. Therefore , he prayed that he is entitled to be reinstated with full back wages .

2. In this case the award was submitted by my learned predecessor on 05-12-97 , wherein it was held that the concerned workman is not entitled for reinstatement and the award was decided against the claimant .

3. Thereafter the workman filed a Civil Misc . Writ Petition No. 13451 of 1998 , wherein vide order dated 02-4-09, the Hon'ble High Court held -In view of the aforesaid the award of the industrial tribunal cannot be sustained and is quashed. The writ petition is allowed and the matter is remitted again to the industrial ibunal to decide the matter afresh .

4. Brief facts of the case are applicant / claimant Shiv Kumar has filed his statement of claim praying that the termination of his services be held as illegal and improper and he is entitled to be reinstated with continuity of service and full back wages and all consequential benefits .

7. The opposite party has filed written statement. Itiscontended by them that the claimant Shiv Kumar was not appointed by Bank of Baroda , Jhansi on the post of sub staff( peon) for full time . Opposite party has not issued any appointment letter therefore , question of termination does not arise . He has not worked continuously in the bank. He has not completed 240 days in the bank . They never terminated the services with effect from 29-07-94 as mentioned in the present reference ; hence the present reference is without jurisdiction according to law and not maintainable . Further they stated that Sri Shiv Kumar lastly worked up to 28-07-94 and thereafter he himself voluntarily left casual work of his own accord with effect from 29-07-94 . Shri Shiv Kumar was never governed by the rules and regulations of the bank . Only permanent employees are governed by rules and regulations . Appointment in bank in sub staff cadre against clear vacancies is filled only through employment exchange . Shri Shiv Kumar had worked on day to day basis for short intervals . He was employed only when there was availability of casual work. Claimant has not filed any documentary proof that he had worked on the post of sub staff / peon . However, it is not disputed that the claimant was paid sundry charges through payment vouchers whenever he actually worked . Appointment for the post of peon is made through employment after interview on the basis ofeligibility suitability etc. He was not subjected to any such exercises .

5. It is alleged by the claimant that he was in continuous employment in the opposite party bank since 12-08-92 . That after holding proper interview and having working experience in Life Insurance Corporation of India , he was appointed as peon in the opposite party bank . It is stated that he was not given any letter of appointment and as such his name was never entered into the attendance register. In the aforesaid circumstances , the claimant was not paid the same and similar wages like other peon of the bank. It is stated that the payment of wages made and the rate of the wages was not fixed and was always on the sweet will ofthe branch manager . He was always paid his wages through blank debit voucher . Whenever he protested the aforesaid matter he was always assured by the branch manager that his regular appointment letter will be issued from the head office of the bank . He is an efficient and hard worker and has got an unblemished record of service .

8. He was never interested in his casual nature of duties, he was irregular and insincere in performing his casual job in the bank . It is stated that different breaks in his casual job was due to the reason that he himselfdid not turn for casual work on such days and no action was taken onhis name . It is stated that he left casual work voluntarily ofhisown accord for better engagement and remuneration elsewhere . It is stated that Shiv Kumar is not covered under the definition ofworkman . Provision of Section 2 - A of the Act are not applicable. It is further stated that he was engaged as a casual labour for only occasional , intermittent and fluctuating work for fetching and storing water for the use of the bank staff. There was no regular vacancy in the bank. It is stated that in the present case Section 25 of the Industrial Disputes Act does not arise at all and the present reference is bad and there is no contravention of Section 25F of the Act . It is stated that the bank has not indulged in any funfair labour practice . It is again stressed that the claimant has never worked continuously and he has not 6. When the claimant hardly pressed his legitimate demands for issuance of appointment letter equal wages and allowances etc. like other peon of the bank , then the branch manager orally terminated his services with effect from 29-7-94 without assigning any reason . Before terminating his services he was neither issued any charge sheet nor given any opportunity of defence. While terminating his services he was not given any notice or wages in licu thereof. While terminating his services he was neither offered nor paid any retrenchment compenstion . Since the termination of his services he has been facing unemployment as he was not given any service 1363 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च6 , 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

17. Claimant Sri Shiv Kumar w.w. I stated on oath that he worked with the opposite party bank at Jhansi as peonwith effect from 12-08-92 to 28-7-94 continuous . He stated that before appointment he was interviewed . At the time of termination of service he was neither served with any notice nor paid any compensation . He has proved the documents running Ext. W- 1 to Ext . W49 .

completed 240days preceding 29-07-94 in the bank . Therefore, the provisions of Section 25 - B , 25F , 25G , 25H and 25N of the Act are not applicable . However it is stated that for the sake of arguments if it is taken to be a case of refusal of employment even then in that case the present case do not cover under Section 2 -A , 2 - K nor Section 2 - S. It is stated that the claimant has a duty to mitigate his loss and it cannot be that during the aforesaid period he remained idle throughout . It is also stated that this tribunal does not have jurisdiction to decide the case and a wrong reference has been sent .

17. Opposite party has produced M.W.I Sri Mahendra Kumar who is senior manager Bank of Baroda . he stated on oath that the workman was engaged at Jhansi branch of the bank for and to serve the water , but the workman did not work continuously at the branch .

9. The , opposite party prayed that the case of the claimant is not tenable and is liable to be rejected and he is not entitled for any relief.

18. Opposite party has raised a number of factual and legal objection .

10. Claimant has filed rejoinder vide paper No. 15/1-15/11.

19. First of all they contended that the claimant is not a workman as defined under Section 2 ( s ) of the Industrial Disputes Act . Plain reading of Section 2 ( s ) of theAct provides - " Workman means any person (including an apprentice ) employed in any industry to do any manual , unskilled , skilled technical , operational clerical , or supervisory work for hire or reward , whether the terms of employment be expressed or implied and for the purpose of any proceedings under this act in relation to any industrial dispute , includes any such person who has been dismissed , discharged or retrenchment in connection with or as consequence of that dispute, or whose dismissal , discharge or retrenchment has lead to that dispute but doesnot include any such person " .

11. It is stated that he was engaged and assigned the job of peon which is of permanent nature and last throughout the year. It is also stated that the work was taken from the claimant for all the days but he was not paid the wages for all the days with the sole intent to show intermittent employment and as such artificial breaks have been shown . It is stated that the services of the claimant wereterminated by oral order . It is stated that as alleged by opposite party no charge sheet was ever served by the opposite party for his irregular and insincere performance of duties . It is stated that on the date of interview three persons were interviewed and only the claimant was selected and was offered employment . It is stated that the demand for equal wages raised by the claimant is one of the root cause of the present dispute . It is stated that the other pleadings of the opposite party are incorrect , misleading and repeated at a number of times and reiterated the own versions.

12. Claimant has filed documentary evidence vide list 17/1 , but these two papers are photocopies . Applicant has also filed photocopies of the payment voucher running from 20-05-93 to 23-07-94 which are 16 in number, these are exhibits W-32-W-47 .

20. Claimant has been engaged or employed by the opposite party bank on daily rated basis though they have not issued any appointment letter . It has been specifically stated by the claimant that they have not issued oppointment letter . He stated and pleaded that whenever he protested he was always assured by the branch manager that his regular appointment letter will be issued from the head office of the bank . Banking is an industry , as has been defined in a number of cases by the Hon'ble Apex Court.Opposite party himself admitted that the claimant was employed for manual work that is to serve and fetch water . Therefore , the opposite party has not been able to show that the claimant does not fall in the definition . From the pleadings and evidence it is clearly ascertained that the claimant falls under the definition of workman as defined under Section 2 (s) of the Act .

13. Opposite party has filed documents vide list 20/1. They have filed 14 payment voucher running from dated 9-10-93 to 16-7-91 , 21-7-94, 25-7-94 and 28-7-94 which are Ext M - 1 to M- 14. They have also filed vouchers vide list paper 24/1 , which are Ext . M- 16 and M-17.

also . 14. Both the parties have adduced oral evidence

15. Claimant has adduced himself as Shiv Kumar W.W. I and opposite party has adduced M.W. 1 Sri Mahendra Kumar . Both the witnesses have been produced .

21. Opposite party has admitted in his pleadings and evidence that the claimant was employed engaged not as a full time . Whatever is stated in para 4 in the written statement is being reproduced - " That Sri Shiv Kumar was not appointed by Bank of Baroda at Jhansi Branch on the postof sub staff (peon ) in full time .

22. But does it indicate , it can be inferred that he wasappointed not in full time but part time . In para 2 of the written statement they stated that he was engaged as a 16. I have examined the oral as well as documentary evidence heard the arguments at length and also perused the rulings of the Hon'ble High Court and Hon'ble Apex Court.

1364

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 /PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] daily rated casual labour which on occasional intermittent and fluctuating basis according to the exigencies of the bank.

29. Therefore , as per evidence , in my view the claimant workman has completed 240 days of continuous service when he was removed from the service .

23. I have gone through the provisions of industrial Disputes Act , 1947. It is social legislation . It has been designed by the legislature to serve social purpose and to protect casual labour , daily rated workers , temporary and adhoc workers also . It does not distinguish between daily rated wager or temporary or permanent employee working in an industry. In this Act certain rights have been given to the working labour as well as to the employer so that the works in the industry go on smoothly.

30. There is a clear provision under the provision ofSection 25F of the Act , that if the workman has to be retrenched he has to be given one months notice in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment and the period of notice has expired or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice wages for the period of notice ---- ( d ) the workman has been paid at the time of retrenchment compensation which shall be equivalent to 15 days average pay (for every completed year of continuous service ) or any part thereof in excess of 6 months and ( c) notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate government ......

24. In this case it has to be seen whether any right accrued to the claimant under the I. D. Act and whether the opposite party has committed breach of any of the pro- visions of the Act .

31. Claimant has placed reliance upon a number of decisions.

( a) AIR 1981 , SC . 722 Surendra Kumar Verma etc. Appellant versus Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour , New Delhi .

25. Claimant has specifically stated in evidence that he worked from 12-08-92 to 28-7-94 . M.W. 1 in his examination in chief has not controverted the duration of the working period of the claimant . When he was cross examined he further stated that the claimant worked from the year 1992 to 1994, but he did not work for all the working days . He further stated that the claimant use to come daily in the bank and whenever there was a need he was engaged onthejob.

35. It has been observed by the Hon'ble Apex Court that welfare statutes must , of necessities , receive broad interpretation. Where legislation is designed to give relief against certain kinds of mischief, the court is not to take in roads by making etymological excursions .

26. Payment vouchers have been filed by the opposite party bank .

33. It has further been held that it is not necessary that he has been in continuous service of one year . It is sufficient that if he had worked for at least 240 days in one year.

34. In the aforesaid case the claimants were employed in the ban and it was held to be an industry .

(b) Claimant also placed reliance [ 2002 ( 94 ) FLR 195 ] Rajasthan High Court between State of Rajasthan andMahamantri Tonk Zila Vansang and another .

27. Workman has invited my attention towards the order of the Hon'ble High Court dated 2-4-09 passed in CMWP No. 134541 of 1998. In this petition also the Hon'ble High Court has observed that the workman worked for 240 days . The retrenchment compensation is required to be paid to a workman who has worked continuously for 240 days in a calendar year whether appointed on a regular basis or daily rate basis . Even if the workman was not appointed at the post but has continued to work in the same capacity continuously for more than 240 days in a calendar year the said workman is required to be paid retrenchment compensation . The Hon'ble court has also held that the petitioner is a workman under the Industrial Disputes Act , therefore is entitled for retrenchment compensation .

35. In this case also the workman was employed for a particular scheme but he worked for more than 240 days . The Hon'ble High Court upheld the award of the labour court and found that the termination of the workman was illegal . In this case also the claimant was a daily wage worker and he was employed by the Forest Department of State of Rajasthan.

Claimant also reliance on a decision 2002 , Lab IC 1923 , Delhi High Court Sripal Singh petitioner versus National Thermal Power Corporation Limited.

36. In this case also findings of the labour court that the workman worked for 240 days and was not served with any retrenchment notice or pay in lieu thereof . Award was decided in favour of the claimant .

37. Therefore from the facts ofthe case it has been found that the opposite party has not issued any notice or retrenchment compensation to the workman at the time of 28. Claimant specifically stated that he worked continuously since 12-8-92 to 28-7-94 . He has been thoroughly cross examined . Nothing has come out in his cross examination which shows that he has not worked continuously for a period of one year or for 240 days . Therefore , as per provisions of Section 25 - B of the Act , the workman has put in continuous service and as per Section 25B ( 1 ) (2 ) ( a) for a period of one year if the workman during the period of 12 calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made had actually worked under the employer for not less than - (1 ) - (ii)240days .

1365 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

( f) 2004 LLR 243 Allahabad High Court Lochan Prasad versus Exective Engineer PWD Bareilly .

terminating his services , therefore , they violated the provisions of Section 25F and 25G of the Act, which is illegal .

(g) Civil Appeal No. 3595-3612 of 1992 Secretary State of Karnataka and others versus Uma Devi & others SC. In this case considering the peculiar circumstances of the case the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that when regular recruitment is undertaken the respondents in these appeals and those in the commercial taxes department similarly situated will be allowed to compete waiving the age restrictions and some other weightage .

40. Therefore every case has been considered on peculiar facts and circumstances of the cases 38. Some time opposite party contended that the workman was not sincere and he voluntarily left the job of hisown accord with effect from 29-7-94 . He contended that he was never interested in his casual nature of duties , he was irregular and insincere in performing his casual job . Different breaks in his casual job were due to the reason that he himselfdid not offer for casual work on such days. There is no evidence on this point and MW.1. has not stated in evidence of these pleadings . These are self contradictory .

39. Opposite has also placed reliance on a number ofpleadings.

41. As the Hon'ble Apex Court has held in AIR 1981 422 ( supra ), where legislation is designed to give relief against certain kinds of mischief the court is not to make inroad by making etymological excursions.

42. Therefore , it is held that the management has committed breach of provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , like Section 25F , 25G ,. This is the observation held by the Hon'ble High Court , Allahabad , in its order 02- 04-09 (supra) .

(a) [2005 ( 109 ) FLR 2004 ] , SC between Branch Manager , M.P. State Agro Industries Development Corporation Limited and another versus S. C. Pandey..I have respectfully gone through decision. In this aforesaid decision the question was for regularization. Considering the peculiar circumstances of the case the Hon'ble SC has paid the compensation .

43. Therefore , considering the facts and circumstances of this case it is held that the action of the Bank of Baroda, Jhansi , in terminating the services of Sri Shiv Kumar claimant workman with effect from 29-07-94 is neither legal nor justified.

(b) [ 2005 ( 104 ) FLR 65 ] Allahabad High Court . Nagar Panchayat Gajraula Moradabad and Presiding Officer, Labour Court , Rampur . In the peculiar facts ofthis case, the Hon'ble High Court held that the employees were working as temporary employees . Their disengagement from service can not be constured to be a retrenchement under the Industrial Disputes Act . Their disengagement was not held as arbitrary .

44. Now it is to be seen as to what consequential relief the workman is entitled . Therefore , the workman is entitled to be reinstated . Now it is to be considered how much back wage to be provided to the workman when he wasterminated till the date of award.

(c) [2004 ( 100 ) FLR 130 ] Allahabad High Court , Jaganath and others versus State of U.P. In the peculiar circumstances of the case which was for regularization . It was held that a daily wage has no right against a post who isnot appointed against any substantive post and state of U.P. was directed to consider their regularization if they fufill the condition laid down in the rule .

45. Claimant has not given any evidence that he hadbeenremained unemployed during this period . He has not stated on oath in his examination in chief that he remained unemployed during this period . Opposite party has pleaded that he must have been engaged somewhere to earn his livelihood , therefore , in the given circumstances I find that he is to be given 50% of the back wages from the date ofhis termination from services 29-7-94 till the date of the award .

(d) 1997 LLR 769 Supreme Court of India between The Executive Engineer State of Karnataka versus K. Somashetty and others . In this case the hon'ble apex court found that the State is not an Industry under the I.D. Act.

46. Hence the award is decided in favour of the claimant and against the opposite party bank .

Date: 1-02-2010

RAM PARKASH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 8 फरवरी , 2010

(c ) 1999 LLR 439 Allahabad High Court State of U.P. versus Labour Court Haldwani & [ 2004 ( 101 ) FLR 1075 ] Jharkhand High Court , Management of Regional Director Animal Husbandry Department Ranchi and Jamil Akhtar and others . In this case also it was held that a daily wage employees engaged by the Department of Government cannot claim their disengagement as illegal on account of non compliance of Section 25F of the Act . However the Hon'ble court held that the workman must get the benefit of age relaxation etc.

का.आ. 679.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ 1366

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 6 , 2010/PHALGUNA 15, 1931

श्रम न्यायालय , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या आर/ 154/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-2-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -12012/243/98- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] यू. एस. पाण्डेय, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 8th February , 2010 S.O. 679. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central overnment hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. R/ 154/ 99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Syndicate Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 8-2-2010 .

[No. L - 12012/243 / 98 - IR ( B - 11 ) ]

U. S. PANDEY , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No.CGIT/ LC / R.154/99

Presiding Officer : Shri Mohd . Shakir Hasan for more than 240 days in the year 1991. It is stated that the non - applicant Bank had given appointment orders to whom worked for more than 240 days . The workman submits that the non -applicant Bank be directed to absorb the applicant w.e.f. December 1991 with back wages .

3. The management Bank did not file any Written Statement but in compliance ofthe order dated 7-9-09 filed reply in the Tribunal . It is stated that whenever a clear vacancy arises in the district , the empanelled candidate can be considered as per his seniority in the panel subject to fulfillment of the other terms and conditions . As per Government guidelines , management is providing employment only to the empanelled candidates in the following order of priority-

(i) From district- wise panel prepared for purpose asper the Government Approach Paper , 1990 in terms ofsettlement dated 9-4-1996 and 6-7-1998 .

(ii ) From panel of temporary candidates worked from 1-1-90 till preparation Employment Exchange Panel -2006 , duly approved by the Head Office , and (iii) From District - wise Employment Exchange Panel prepared and approved by the Head Office.

It isfurther stated that the Bank has already assured the workman to provide employment in any of the branch situated in Chhattisgarh State .

Workman/Union

Shri Jeevan Lal Choudhari , S/ o Late Moolchand Choudhari , Near Choubey Hotel , Gandhi Chowk, Raja Talab , Raipur

Versus

......Management The Branch Manager , Syndicate Bank, Station Road, Raipur

AWARD

Passed on this 1st February , 2010 1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L - 12012/243 / 98 - IR ( B - II ) dated 31-3-1999 , has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal

"Whether the termination of Shri Jeevan Lal Choudhari , Ex - Temporary Attender - cum - casual workman bythe management of Syndicate Bank w.e.f. June 1997 is justified ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled ?

2. The case of the workman , in short is that the workman worked in non - applicant Bank from 1981 to 1996 4. The workman/ applicant filed an application dated 1-2-2010 alongwith letter dated 1-12-2009 of the Bank whereby the Bank is ready to regularize the service in the Bank of the workman provided the I.D. Case is disposed offatCGIT, Jabalpur . The workman submits that no dispute award be passed . The management has no objection if the same is disposed off. The following is the text of the letter dated 1-12-2009 which is reproduced as under

"The Competent Authority has accorded their clearance for regularizing your services in the Bank and you are supposed to be posted at our Korba Branch subject to the disposal of I.D. case raised by you and pending at CGIT , Jabalpur . We request you to ensure the disposal of case before Issue of appointment order . On receipt of the confirmation from you , we shall take up the matter . " 5. Under the circumstances of the case , no dispute award is passed without any costs .

6. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules .

MOHD . SHAKIR HASAN , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 8 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 680.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार व्हिकल फैक्ट्री 1367 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

T.No. Q.A. T/90/0848 from service w.e.f. 30-3-94 is legal and justified ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई टी/एल सी/आर/176/97 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 08-02-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -14012/ 13/ 96- आईआर ( डीयू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

2. The workman appeared in the proceeding in person on 16-12-06 . Thereafter the case was pending for filing statement of claim . Subsequently he became absent . The then Tribunal proceeded the proceeding exparte against him on 7-7-08 after giving full opportunity to contest the proceeding.

New Delhi , the 8th February , 2010

3. The then Tribunal directed the non- applicant/ management to file the written statement . The learned counsel for the management submitted that he does not wantto file any written statement since there is no statement ofclaim of the workman .

4. It is clear that there is no case of either of the parties . This is a case of no evidence .

S.O. 680.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. CGIT/ LC / R/ 176 / 97 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Vehicle Factory and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 8-02-2010.

5. In the result, no dispute award is passed without any order to costs.

[No. L- 14012/ 13 / 96-1R ( DU ) ]

SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

6. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules .

ANNEXURE

MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 8 फरवरी , 2010

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM - LABOUR COURT , JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/ R . 176/97

PresidingOfficer: Shri Mohd. Shakir Hasan

का.आ. 681.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सी जी आई टी/एल सी/ आर/ 52/ 2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-02-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था। حی Workman /Union

Shri Chinta Ram , S/ o Ramsingh Thakur , Qr . No. 1559 , Type - 1 VFJ Estate , Jabalpur ( MP )

Versus

[सं. एल-40012/ 201/2000 - आईआर (डीयू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 8th February , 2010 Management

The General Manager, Vehicle Factory, Jabalpur

AWARD

Passed on this 25th day of January, 2010

S.O. 681. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref . No. CGIT / LC/R/ 52/ 2001 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 8-02-2010 .

1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L- 14012/ 13 / 96 - IR ( DU ) dated 18-6-97, has referred the following dispute for adjudication bythis tribunal: -

[No. L-40012/201 /2000 - IR ( DU ) ]

SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer "Whether the action of the management , Vehicle factory, Jabalpur ( MP ) in terminating Shri Chinta Ram Ex-

688GI/10-15 1368

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 / PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No.CGIT/LC/ R . 52/2001

Presiding Officer : Shri Mohd. Shakir Hasan Shri Shyam Singh Kushwah , S/o S.C. Kushwah , R/ O Biaora ,

Workman/Union Rajgarh (MP)

Versus

The Chief General Manager, Deptt. of Telecommunication , Hoshangabad Road, M. P. Circle, Bhopal (M. P. )

The DET, Rajgarh

Managements

AWARD

Passed on this Ist day of February -2010 1. The Government of India, Ministry of Labour videitsNotification No. L - 40012 /201 / 2000 - IR ( DU ) dated 9-2-2001 , has referred the following dispute for adjudication bythistribunal

"Whether the action of the management of Chief General Manager , Telecom/ DET in terminating the services of Shri Shyam Singh Kushwah S / o Shivcharan Kushwah w.c.f. 1990 is justified ? If not to what relief the workman is entitled ? "

2. The workman inspite of proper notice , did not appear and therefore the predecessor's Tribunal proceeded exparte against the workman on 9-3-67 .

3. The management appeared and filed written statement . The case of the management , in short , is that the workman was engaged in the year 1989 on casual basis for a specific period for a specific work with a condition that on completion of the work , his service became to an end automatically. He was not appointed on regular Basis . Hiscase comes under the provision of Section 2 ( oo ) ( bb ) ofthe Industrial Dispute Act 1947 ( in short 1.D. Act , 1947) and therefore he is not entitled to any relief under the provisions of I.D. Act , 1947. The reference be answered in favour of the management .

4. The only point of issue is as to whether the action of the management in terminating the service of Shri Kushwaha is justified ?

5. To prove the case , the management has examined only one witness . Management witness Mr. Ramjani Khan was working as S.D.E. ( Adm. ) O/ o T.D.E , Rajgarh , Biaora . He has supported the case of the management and has stated that the workman was engaged on casual labour for a fixed work for a specified period on condition and his

[PART 11 SEC. 3 ( ii ) | service was automatically terminated on the expiry of the period. His evidence shows that the workman comes under the provisions of Section 2 ( oo) ( bb) of the I.D. Act , 1947 and therefore he was not retrenched . He is not entitled to any relief. The reference is answered in favour of the management.

6. In the result , the award is passed exparte against the workman without any order to costs .

7. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules .

MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 8 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 682.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.पी.डब्ल्यू. डी..के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 17/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 08-2-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-42011/16/2006- आईआर ( डीयू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 8th February , 2010

S.O. 682. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government herey publishes the award ( Ref. No. 17/2006 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of C.P.W.D. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 08-02-2010.

| No. L -42011 / 16/2006 - IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT LUCKNOW PRESENT : N.K.PUROHIT, Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 17/2006

Ref. No. L-42011 / 16/ 2006 - IR (DU ) dated : 25-7-2006 . BETWEEN

Shri A.L.Pandey , Regional President ( NR ) All India CPWD ( MRM ) Karmchari Sangathan , Income- Tax -Building , Near Pump House , Mahatma Gandhi Marg , CivilLines , Allahabad.

1369 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

AND

Rs . 3050-4590 has been paid to the workman . The award dt .7-6-97 not applicable in the matter of daily wager .

The Executive Engineer , Allahabad Elect. Division CPWD, Sangam Palace , 4th Floor , Civil Lines , Allahabad .

AWARD

5. The workman filed rejoinder wherein he had reiterated the averments in claim statement and has not introduced any new facts .

25-01-2010

6. The parties have filed documentary evidence in support of their respective cases . The workman filed his affidavit in support of his case whereas opposite party has examined Sh. K.S. Sandhu , Executive Engineer .

1.By order No. L-42011 / 16 /2006 - IR ( DU ) dated 25-7-2006 the Central Government , Ministry of Labour New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section (1) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) referred this industrial dispute betweenSh . A.L.Pandey, Regional President (NR) All India CPWD ( MRM ) Karmchari Sangathan , Income- Tax Building , Near Pump House , Mahatma Gandhi Marg , Civil Lines , Allahabad and the Executive Engineer , Allahabad Elect . Division , CPWD, Sangam Palace , 4th Floor , Civil Lines , Allahabad for adjudication .

under; 2. The terms of reference under adjudication as

7. During the course of adjudication the workman moved an applicationdt. 5-1-2010 wherein he has stated that in view of the orders passed by the opposite party dt. 26-4-2006 and 14-12-2009 , he does not want to pursue and press his claim in the Tribunal and wants to withdraw his claim . In reply to it vide applicationdt. 19-1-2010 , the opposite party has also submitted that follow up steps are being taken in the light of the circular dt . 26-6-2006 if the workman is entitled to get any benefit under said circular , the same will be given to him.

"Whether the demand of the CPWD ( MRM ) Karmachari sangathan for regularization ofthe services of the workman Shri Sushil Kumar Jaiswal , Wireman w.e.f. 26-4-1982 instead of 1-1-1991 by management of Central Public Works Deptt . , is legal and justified ? If so , to what relief the workman concerned is entitled and from which date."

8. Circular no . 9 / 77 / 2000 - ECX , New Delhi dt. 26-6-2006was issued by the Directorate General ( Works ) , CPWD in respect of Payment of gratuity to its casual worker /hand receipt worker/ muster roll workers under the payment of Gratuity Act , 1972. The said circular makes it clear that the matter was examined in consultation with the Ministry of Urban Development and Ministry of Labour and it was clarified that the Act is applicable to casual , muster roll , hand receipt and daily rated workers of CPWD . Consequently , all ADGs/ CEs / SEs and Dy . Labour Welfare Commissioner and Asstt . Labour Welfare Commissioner were requested to make payment of gratuity to casual muster roll, hand receipt and daily rated workers of CPWD as admissible under the Act. It was further mentioned therein that the current/pending court cases on the similar issue may be defended or got settled accordingly , therefore , it is evident that management admits the claim of all casual labours , hand receipt , daily rated workers of CPWD for payment of gratuity under the Act .

3. The case of the workman , in brief, is that he was initially appointed as Asstt . Wireman on muster roll on 26-4-1982 . Since , semi skilled category has been merged with the main category in accordance with partly implementation of Arbitration Award 1988 dt. 17-1-1986 as per the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Surendra Singh & Other's vs. Chief Engineer , CPWD , the workman is entitled to receive the benefit of maincategory w.e. f. his initial appointment on muster roll . On the basis of above judgement vide orderdt . 7-12-1998 the Director General of Works issued orders of regularization of services of all muaster roll workmen in CPWD by 7-12-1988 . The workman has prayed to pass the award for regularization of his services from the date of initial employment i.e. 26-4-82 in the proper pay scale with all consequential benefits .

9. Since , the workman has not pressed his claim for regularization of the services from the date of initial employment in anticipation to get benefit ofthe said circular dt. 26-6-2006 and the opposite party is under obligation to implement the aforesaid circular, it is concluded that the grievance of the workman stands redressed and there is no grievance left with the workman . Resultantly , no relief is required to be given to the workman and no claim award is passed.

4. The opposite party has denied the claim of the workman in its written statement pleading therein that workman was appointed as Asstt. Wireman on 1-1-1991 and prior to that he had worked as daily wager . The period during which he had worked as daily wager can not be considered for qualfying service as per rules . The post of Asstt .Wireman has been merged with the post of Wireman and salary payble to the Wireman in the pay scale of 1370

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[PART 11- SEC . 3( ii) ] 10. The reference under adjudication is answered accordingly.

11. Award as above .

Lucknow

N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer

2. Whether the action of the management of Dy. Chief Engineer ( Works ) , Central Railway , Jhansi in terminating the services of Sh . Chander Bhushan Pandey, casual labour with effect from 19-6-76 is legal and justified ? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled? 25-1-2010

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 683.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 10/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-2-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-41012/83/98- आईआर( बी. - 1 ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 9th February , 2010

S.O. 683. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 10/99 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Kanpur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the management of Central Railway and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 9-2-2010 .

[No. L -41012/ 83 / 98 - IR ( B - I ) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

3. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the claimant was appointed as casual labour on 30-1-76 by the opposite party and he continued to work without any break up to 19-6-76 . It is also stated that along with him several other labours were appointed. It has further been alleged by the workman that Dy . Chief Engineer ( Construction ) used to take work of Asstt. under him where he used to maintain the record of store and also used to supply the store items on the basis of indent .It is also stated that Dy. Chief Engineer (Construction) took work from the workman continuously up to 19-6-76 and during the period of his employment the conduct and behavior of the workman remained always satisfactory . It has further been pleaded by the workman that his services were removed by the opposite party on 19-6-76 and from them he is unemployed. It has further been pleaded by the workman thatpersons junior to him viz . , Shakil Ahmad son of Abdul Sakur ( Ticket No. 69) SS Printin Khalasi, Sri Pawan Pathak ticket No. 1201 and Sri Ravi Sen ticket No. 01143 TM Section are still working with the opposite party but opposite party till date neither took the workman on work nor any information was ever given to him as to when he would be allowed work . Therefore , the action of the opposite party isviolative of the provisions of Section 25F, 25G and 25H ofIndustrial Disputes Act , 1947 .

BEFORE SRI RAM PARKASH , HJS , PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, KANPUR

Industrial Dispute No. 10/1999 BETWEEN

The Dy. Chief Engineer ( Construction) , Central Railway, Jhansi .

AND

4. The Claimant further pleads that from time totime he made repeated representations requesting therein to allow work but all remained in vain as no action thereon was taken by the opposite party . In this way the opposite party has illegally removed the services of the workman with effect from 19-06-76 in violation of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. The claimant has , therefore, prayed that he be reinstated in the service of the oppoiste party with effect from 19-06-76 with full back wages , continuity of service and with all consequential benefits .

Sri Chander Bhushan Pandey, Sh . KGN Khare, Central Regional Workshop Karamchari Sangh , Roadways Central Workshop, Rawatpur. Kanpur.

AWARD

1. Central Government MOL , New Delhi , vide notification no . L -41012/ 83/98 /IR( B - I ) dated 12-1-99 has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal

5. The opposite party has vehemently denied the claim of the workman in their written statement . It is admitted by the oppoite party that the claimant was engaged as a casual labour on 30-01-76 and the project against which he was engaged and the work used to be taken from the claimant on need basis was over on 18-06-76 , and therefore , he ceased to be engaged with effect from 18-06-76 upon completion of the work . The claimant throughout has been a casual and on the date of disengagement i.e. 18-06-76 also he was a casual worker , Casual workers are not railway 1371

1931D ENT

भारत का राजपत्र मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15,

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

baik 13. I have also examined the statement of the management MW.1 Sri Deepak Chandra Patel who is Executive Engineer with the railway has been produced . He has stated that the claimant has worked with the railway from January 76 till mid of June 1976. But he worked only for 140 days . He was engaged for a construction project and the work of this project was finished in the year 1976 . He was not given any appointment letter.

14. I analyzed the evidence of both the parties . From the evidence of the parties this fact has been revealed that the claimant worked with the opposite party as a casual labour from 30-1-76 to 18-06-76 . In this way he has worked only for 140 days approximately as stated by the opposite party. This fact is not in dispute.

employee nor do these workers come under I.D. Act . The Act itself is not attracted to the claimant in dispute . It is further alleged that the claimant cannot claim any benefit for his so called engagement nor for his disengagement with effect from 19-06-76 . Casual labour's retrenchment due to lesser work is neither illegal act in the eye of law nor in fact he can claim anything on that basis under Industrial Disputes Act. It is denied by the opposite party that there are any senior or junior in day to day casual employment nor any such alleged junior continued to be engaged as casual worker . It is also denied by the opposite party that the worker ever had approached any railway officers or Inspectors for his reemployment . The claim of the workman is bogus and false . The dispute is highly belated and has been raised on the ill advice of someone after very long gap of about 24 years and is liable to be thrown aside and award be passed in favour of the respondent and against the claimant.

15. Now it is to be seen whether any right has accrued to the claimant and whether opposite Party has committed any breach of the provisions of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947.

16. Section 25F of the Act provides- No workmen employed on any industry who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched by that employer until .

6. The claimant has filed rejoinder but nothing new has been stated therein except denying the fact that he was engaged on project whereas in fact he was engaged by the opposite party to perform all kind of work .

(a) the workman has been given on months notice...... Therefore as per Section 25F of the Act the requisite condition is that the workman should have completed one year under the employer in continuous service .

17. Continuous service have been defined under Section 25 - B of the Act.ati no

(i) A workman shall be said to be in continuous service for a period if he is , for that period , in uninterrupted service which is not due to any fault on the part of the workman ..

7. Claimant has filed vide list 13/1 , 20 documents , which are mostly the photocopies . These documents also include the postal receipts , like UPC and Registry , Claimant has also filed eight documents vide list dated 2-11-04 list serial No. 26/1 . The documents are record of service casual labour book , letter of claimant to the Divisional Railway Manager dated 1-4-85 paper No. 26/2 , and another letter dated 4-6-85 along with registered receipt paper No. 26/3 , letter of Central Railway addressed to the claimant dated 22/24-12-85 paper No. 26/4 , letter of there claimant paper No. 26/5 to 26/9 .

8. The opposite party has not filed any documentary evidence.

(ii) Where a workman is not in continuous service withinthe meaning of clause ( i) for a period of one year or six month , he shall be deemed to be in continuous service under an employer .

9. Both the parties have adduced oral evidence .

10. The claimant has adduced himself as W.W.I Chander Bhushan Pandey . Opposite parties has adduced in evidence Sri Deepak Chandra Patel as M.W.1 .

( a) For a period of one year if the workman during the period of 12 calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made has actually worked under the employer for not less than.-

(1) 190 days in the case of workman employed below ground in a mine , and

11. I have perused the whole record and the evidence. Heard the arguments of the claimant . Oppsite was not present at the time of arguments .

(ii) 240 days , in any other case .

18. In the case of Surenamal & Stamping Works Limited versus Their Workmen 1963 (7 ) FLR 236 ( Superme Court) , it has been observed before a workman can be considered to have completed one year of continuous service in an industry it must be shown that he was employed for a period of not less than 12 calender months 12. Claimant has stated on oath that he was oppointed as a casual labour on 30-1-76 and worked there up to 19-06-76 . He was removed after giving him a notice and thereafter fresh hands were inducted by the railway but he was not taken on the work . He has written a number of letter in this respect to the railway . At the time of removing from job he was not given any retrenchment compensation .

1372

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 /PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] and next that during those 12 calender months had worked for not less than 240 days .

19. In the present case both the conditions which are required by sections 25B and 25F are not being proved by the claimant . At the most he had worked only for 140 days .

Government herey publishes the award ( Ref. No. 7/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour Court , Kanpur as shown in the anhexure , in the Industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of Indore, and their workmen , receivedby the Central Government on 9-2-2010.

[ No. L- 12012/89 /2007 - IR (B - I ) ]

SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer 20. It is also the contention of the claimant that after his removal some fresh recruitment was made by the opposite party but there is no conclusive evidence on this issue, hence the contention is not maintainable .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI RAM PARAKASH , H.JS , PRESIDING OFFICER

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, KANPUR

Industrial Dispute No. 7 of 2008

In the matter of dispute between:

21. It is also contended that certain juniors like Shakil Ahmed , Pavan Pathak and Ravi Sen who were junior to him are still engaged . I have perused the facts in this aspect also . Though there is no mention of this issue in the reference order , still there is no conclusive evidence given by the claimant in this respect . Opposite party has denied this fact in their written statement and evidence. Opposite party has contended that the claimant was engaged for a particular project of constructior which was completed in the year 1976 and the project was over , there was no requirement of the services of the claimant so he could not be engaged further .

Ghanshyam Ji Yadav ,

Son of Sri Lalji Yadav , 28/4 , Daraganj , Allahabad.

AND

22. It is also the contention of the opposite party that in the case of a casual labour there is no question of seniority or juniority for a particular project and a part time engagement of the casual labour. I fully agree with the contention of the opposite party .

23. Therefore , considering the whole evidence I find that he claimant has not been able to prove his case and there is no illegality on the part ofthe opposite party railway in not engaging him for futher work . No right has accrued to the claimant.

The General Manager , State Bank of Indore , LDA Centre , 2, Sardar Patel Marg . CivilLines, Allahabad.

AWARD

24. Therefore , the award is decided against the claimant and in favour of opposite party.

Dt. 29-01-2010

RAM PARKASH , Presiding Officer

1. Central Government , MOL New Delhi , vide notification No. L - 12012 / 89 /2007/ IR( B - 1 ) dated 01-11-07, has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal.

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2010

2. Whether the action of the management of State Bank of Indore , Civil Lines Branch , Allahabad in terminating services of Sri Ghanshyamji Yadav daily wage [ peon] from 28-2-07 is legal and justified? Ifnot , what relief the workman concerned is entitled to ?

का.आ. 684.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इन्दौर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 7/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-2-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -12012/89/2007- आईआर ( बी. - 1 ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

3. Brief facts are that Government of India, MOL , New Delhi has sent the aforesaid reference dated 1-11-07 , for decision to this Tribunal . It was also ordered that the parties raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents etc. before the tribunal within 15 days of the receipt of this order etc. New Delhi , the 9th February , 2010

4.After the reference was received in this tribunal , registered notices were sent to both the parties by the office . Since 27-11-07 , numerous dates were given.

S.O. 684. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1373 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

Repeated notice was also sent to the claimant but he did not turn up to file his statement of claim whereas opposite party has put in its appearance on the first date 2-4-08 .

The Assistant General Manager , State Bank of India , Region - V, State Bank of India , Zonal Office , I , Parliament Street ,

New Delhi - 11000 1 .

Management

AWARD

5. Opposite party has opposed the case of the claimant . It is stated that the claimant is not interested at all otherwise he must have come and file his statement of claim. I agree with the contention of the opposite party.

6. Therefore , award is decided against the claimant in the absence of statement of claim and in favour of opposite party.

RAM PARKASH , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 10 फरवरी , 2010

Anex - serviceman joined service of the State Bank ofIndia as a Guard on 17-5-84 . In November , 2002 he took test for promotion for the post of Cashier- cum- Record Keeper . In January , 2003 he was called for an interview . His name did not find place in the list of selected candidates . He raised a dispute claiming that he was entitled for four marks for military service rendered by him . In case those four marks would have been added, his name would have been amongst the selected candidates for promotion to thepost ofCashier- cum - Record Keeper . Since conciliation proceedings failed , the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribuna ! for adjudication , vide order No. L - 12012/ 136/ 2005 - IR( B - II ) , New Delhi , dated 4-9-2006, withfollowing terms : ---

का.आ. 685.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण -1 , दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 70/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10-2-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/136/2005- आईआर( बी.- 1 ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 10th Febuary, 2010

"Whether the demand of the union for computation of two marks on every completed year of service rendered by Joginder Singh , Head Guard , working in State Bank of India , New Delhi , is just, fair and legal ? If yes to what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ? "

S.O. 685. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government herey publishes the award (Ref. No. 70/2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court- 1 , Delhi as shown in the annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and their workmen , received by the Central Government ρη 10-02-2010 .

[No. L - 12012/ 136/2005 - IR( B - I ) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE Dr. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT NO . 1, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI

I. D. No. 70/2006

Joginder Singh , Senior Head Guard ,

Through the General Secretary,

All India Bank Staff Association ( Regd.)

33-34 , Bank Enclave , Ring Road ,

Workman

Rajouri Garden , New Delhi - 110027 .

Versus

2. Claim statement was filed by Shri Joginder Singh pleading therein that he joined Indian Army, where he was promoted to the post of Havaldar . He served Indian Army for 15 years . Thereafter he joined services of the management bank as Guard on 17-5-84 . In November , 2002 he took test for promotion to the post of Cashier - cum- Record Keeper . For that test , an employee who had put in 8 years of service having education qualifications upto 8th standard was eligible to appear . Since he had put in required years of service and was matriculate , hence he was allowed to appear in written test . He qualified written test and was called for interview in January, 2003. List of selected candidates was issued in March , 2003 wherein his name did not find place. Persons , junior to him and having lesser qualification , were selected by the management . He was entitled for five marks for rural service back - ground , four marks as an ex - serviceman and 15 marks for his service record . In case above marks would have been added to marks obtained in written test as well as interview , he would have figured in the list of selected candidates . He made several representations but to no avail . He made an appeal to Chief General Manager , which could not find favours with him . He raised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer wherein no settlement could be arrived at . He presents that as per guidelines of the Government of India, he was entitled for weightage of one year in service on every completed five years service with the Indian Army . He was entitled to two years weightage in his service . That [PART 11- SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/ PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

1374

weightage was not given to him . He presents that the action of the management in not promoting him to the post of Cashier-cum-Record Keeper w.e.f. 1-8-2001 may be declared illegal, unfair and unjustified and management may be commanded to promote him on above post retrospectively with all consequential benefits .

employee with 8 years service as on 31-3-01 was eligible for promotion to the post of Record Keeper - cum- Cashier . However, service put in as permanent part time employee . prior to full time appointment was to be reckoned proportionately by notionally converting part time service into full time service in case such full time employee has less than 8 years service . Two marks for every completed year of service beyond 9 years were to be awarded with a maxima of 20 marks . Candidates were required to possess 8thstandard educational qualification as on 31st of March , 2001. Total hundred marks were allocated , out of which 60marks were allotted to written test , 20 marks were allotted to length of service , 10 marks were allotted to performance appraisal and 10 marks were allotted to interview . One mark for every completed year of service in a rural branch , subject to maxima of five marks were to be given as bonus . In case a candidate secures 40 % marks in his written examination , hewas eligible for being called for all interview.

3.The management demurred the claim pleading that there does not exist an industrial dispute , since it has not been espoused by the union or a substantial number of the workmen . The dispute raised by the claimant is not an industrial dispute within the meaning of clause ( k) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (in short the Act) . It was claimed that employees of the category of the claimantwere eligible to get relaxation of maximum two years of service vis a vis general candidates . Once this relaxation is granted and eligibility to appear in promotional test is decided , no more relaxation is available to an ex- serviceman candidate . Marks allotted for service were for service rendered in the bank and not for service put in the Army. The claimant was under a misconception that four additional marks were to be given for being an ex- serviceman . Test for promotion to the post of Cashier- cum-Record Keeper was conducted wherein 60 marks were allotted for written test , 20 marks were for length of service , 10 marks were for performance of appraisal and 10 marks were for interview. No additional weightage was to be given for service rendered in the Indian Army . When he could not qualify the test he made representation dated 15-9-2003, which was replied vide letter dated 30-10-03. His representation dated 22-3-2004 was also replied vide letter dated 9-6-2004 .His claim being devoid of merits , is liable to bedismissed .

7. Circular No. CDO : PER : 55 of 2001-2002 dated 13-8-2001 was issued by the bank with a view to give weightage to ex - serviceman employees for service rendered by them with the Indian Army . It was provided in the said circular that as per guidelines of the Government of India weightage was to be given to an ex - serviceman for being eligible for the purpose of above said promotion in the ratio of one year for every completed five years of service putin Armed Forces subject to maxima of two years in total service . No pro - rata weightage was to be given for that purpose. It was provided therein that relaxation in service for out of cadre promotion was to be given for one year for 5 years service and for two years for 10 years or more service rendered with the Indian Army .

4. Shri J. N. Kapoor , authorized representative for the workman claimed that matter may be adjudicated on the basis of pleadings and documents of the parties. Shri Pravin Sharma , authorized representative for the management, was also of the view that the dispute can be adjudicated on pleadings and documents relied by the parties . Neither the workman nor the management opted to adduce any evidence .

8. Relaxation in service on the basis of service rendered in Indian Army would mean that in case an ex- serviceman employee had rendered ten years service with Indian Army and as on 31-3-2001 and had rendered six years service as sub staff with the bank , in that eventuality he becomes eligible for promotion as record keeper - cum- cashier on the basis of two years relaxation for serving Indian Army . Therefore , weightage of having served Indian Army for 10 years or more was available in the form of relaxation for required years of eligible service . In case an ex- serviceman is otherwise eligible, after having rendered 8 years service with the bank , he was not to get pro rata weightage of service rendered with the Indian Army . This weightage was for the purpose of giving him relaxation for reckoning of eligible service , for making him to compete for the post , without rendering required 8 years service with the bank.

5.Arguments were heard at the bar. Shri J. N. Kapoor, authorized representative , advanced arguments on behalf of the workman . Shri Pravin Sharma , authorized representative raised his submissions on behalf of the management. Written submissions were filed on behalf of the workman . I have given my carefull considerations to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record . My findings on issues involved in the controversy are as follows :

6. Circular No.CDO: PER: 26th of 2000-2002 dated 4thof June , 2001 was issued by the bank for promotion to the post of Record Keeper- cum- Cashier at rural branches . Eligibility criteria for the candidates was detailed in the circular, out of which it emerges that permanent full time

9. The claimant had rendered 17 years of service with the bank as on the date of the test. He was already eligible to appear in the written test . In such a situation he was not to be given pro rata weightage for the service rendered by him with the Indian Army . Circular dated [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1375 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1 , DHANBAD

In the matter of a reference u/ s 10( 1 )( D) (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947

Reference No. 27 of 2003

13-8-2001 nowhere come for his rescue , in the manner of calculation of his actual service . He cannot get four additional marks for the service rendered by him with the Indian Army . Though two years relaxation would have been admissible to him in case he would have rendered only six years of service with the bank as on 31-3-2001 and not otherwise . Therefore the claim of the claimant that he would have been awarded four additional marks for the service rendered with the Indian Army , is unfounded .

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of

Kusunda Area of M / s . BCCL

AND

Their Workmen

Present : H. M. Singh , Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES

: Shri U. N. Lal , Advocate

For the Employers

For the Workmen

Shri S.C. Gour , Advocate/ Vice President , N.C.W.C.

State: Jharkhand

Industry: Coal 10. In view of the discussion referred above , it is evident that the demand of the union for computation of two marks on every completed five years of service rendered by Joginder Singh with the Indian Army is found to be not justified . Management bank was not supposed to give pro - rata weightage of the said circular to claimant Joginder Singh while articulating as to whether he has successfully undertaken the test for promotion to the post of cashier - cum - record keeper . Action of the management is found to be just , fair and legal . Joginder Singh is not entitled to any relief. Award is accordingly passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government for its publication .

Dated, the 18th January , 2010

Dated 14-1-2010

AWARD

Dr. R. K. YADAV , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली , 9 फरवरी , 2010

By Order No. L - 20012 /233/ 2002- IR( C-1 ) dated 10-3-2003 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d ) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section ( 2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

का.आ. 686. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बी. सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 27/03 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-2-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the demand of the NCWC from the management of Kusunda Area of M/ s . BCCL for regularising Sri Bijay Kumar Paswan in Clerical Grade and subsequently upgrading to Clerical Grade - II is fairandjustified ? If so , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from what date ? "

[सं. एल-20012/233/2002- आई आर( सी-1 ) ]

स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 9th February , 2010

S.O. 686. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government herey publishes the award (Ref. No. 27/03 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 , Dhanbad now as shown in the annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . B. C. C. L. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 9-2-2010 .

[ No. L - 20012/233/2002 - IR ( C - 1 ) ]

SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

2. Written Statement has been filed on behalf of the concerned workman stating that Bijay Kumar Paswan , workman , was appointed in the year 1986 as a piece- rated minor/ loader with his posting at Dobari Colliery under Bastocolla Area of M/ s . BCCL .In the year 1988 the workman's service was confirmed as a permanent worker after completion of 240 days attendance in the previous year . He was a matriculate . The management transferred him at Lodna Area of BCCL as a Time Rated Mazdoor in Cat. - 1 . In the year 1991 the management of Lodna Area had several clerical vacancies and the workman was offered the job of Clerical (T) with Category - 1 . When after one year, the concerned workman was not regularised as Grade - III Clerk, he requested the management to regularise him as Grade- III clerk from 21-10-92 and thereafter as Grade- II Clerk on the basis of nomenclature and job description for coal workers . The concerned workman was 688 GI /10-16 1376

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/ PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii) ] continued to be paid Cat- I /Goup V - S Wages from 1991 to 1999 and thereafter, when he persistently raised the matter with higher authorities , he was transferred to Kuksunda Area under another General Manager of M/ s . BCCL , just to harass and penalise him . He was posted at Kusunda Area with a newdesignation of Dump Man/ Trip Man in Clerical Grade - III instead of Grade - II . The concerned workman, as a disciplined worker, obeyed the order and started working at the transferred place in the year 1999 under protest and thereafter raised industrial dispute which, after failure , resulted in the present reference for adjudication. The concerned workman is entitled for wages ofGrade - 111 clerical from 21-10-92 and after 21-10-93 Clerical Grade- II which he has been doing as per Office Order of 21-10-1991 of Lodna Area of BCCL .

It has been prayed that the Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to hold that the demand of the union for regularisation of the concerned workman in Clerical Grade - IIIfrom 21-10-1992 and Clerical Grade - II w.e.f. 21-10- 1993 , the job he has been doing continuously is justified and be pleased to order for payment of difference of wages from 21-10-1992 till date.

transferred from Dobari Colliery to Lodna Area and in Lodna Area he was asked to do the job of Clerk in Gr . - III which he did honestly but was paid wages of Group V- A of Miner/ Loader instead of actual Grade - III Clerical wages . He had made representation to regularise him as a clerk and the papers are marked Ext . M - 2 to M - 2/ 1 . The management sent details to BCCL Headquarters for approval to work as a Clerk and BCCL approved the same in the year 1996 which Ext. W-3. In spite of clear instruction , the management did not regularise him as a clerk and when persistant demand was made , he was transferred to Kusunda at a distance of more than 12 km. as per Ext. W-4 and Ext . W- 4/ 1 . At Kusunda he was given the designation of Dumperman in 1999, but under protest the workman reported for duty at Kusunda Area and raised industrial dispute which resulted in the present reference . At Kusunda Area he worked as a Clerk Grade - II too and the papers are marked as Ext. W- 5 to W - 5 / 2 . Personnel Officer's clerk is a Grade - II Clerical , as per nomenclature and job description for Coal Mines , formulated by JBCCI . As per BCCL's Certified Standing Orders of 1990 , a workman who completes six months in a higher job on clear vacancy, is entitled to be regularised for the said job as per para 7.2 and 7.3 . As per para 7.2 permanent workman is one , who is employed on a job of permanent nature , for a period of at least six months or who has satisfactorily put in six months continuous service in a permanent post , as a probation.

As per para 7.3 a probationer means a person who is employed to fill a vacancy in a permanent post for a period not acceeding six months and who has not completed his probationery period , provided that the period as probation may be extended to by the management beyond the original period, by not more than three months , for reasons to be recorded in writing . If a permanent workman is employed as a probationer in a new post, he may at any time , during the probationary period, not exceeding six months , he reverted to his old permanent post , unless the probationary period is extended by another three months for reasons to be recorded in writing.

3. The Management filed written statement stating that the concerned workman has been working as Dump man / Tripman since last more than four years . For this the written consent was given by the workman at that point of time and an office order dated 25 / 27-5-99 was issued by the General Manager ( MIS ) , BCCL , Koyla Bhawan communicating approval for regularisation in Clerical Gr. - III subject to criteria stipulated therein . Now the union has raised another dispute in contravention of the earlier decision taken . There is surplus strength in ministerial cadre in entire BCCL . , there was , therefore , ban on diversion as perDirector (Personnel ) ' s letter issued in 1992. The demand of the NCWC for regularisation in Clerical Grade and subsequent demand for upgradation to Clerical Gr . - II is not justified. This is also as per back ground of the case that consent was given for regularisation as Dumpman/ Trip man in Clerical Grade - III . Therefore , the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief .

It has been prayed that the Hon'ble , Tribunal be pleased to pass an award holding that the demand of the union for regularisation of the concerned workman in Clerical Grade - 11 is not justified.

4. Both the parties have filed their respective rejionders admitting and denying the contents of some of the paragraphs of each other's written statement .

7. The management's counsel argued that the post ofGrade - II is selection grade as per cadre scheme and the concerned workman cannot be promoted to Clerk Gr . II . Moreover, he was transferred to Kusunda Area and given the designation of Dump Man / Tripman in Clerical Grade- III on his written undertaking and in no case he can be regularised . It shows that the concerned workman was working in Kusunda Area as Clerk, and as per Ext . W - 5 / 1 the concerned workman's name has been mentioned as clerk and as per Ext . W - 5 his name has been mentioned as clerk.

5. The workman has produced himself as WW- I who has proved Exts . W- 1 to W - 3 , W- 4 , Ext . W- 4/ 1 , Ext . W- 5 to Ext. W -5/2

The management has produced MW- 1 - A . Ram who has proved Exts . M - 1 to M -3 .

6. The argument advanced on behalf ofthe workman is that he is matriculate and in the year 1991 he was

8. MW - 1A . Ram has stated in cross - examination that I cannot say what work he was performing in Lodna Area. No papers regarding his consent has been filed in thisTribunal . We have not filed any paper to show that he was working as Dumpman / Tripman . As per Ext . W- 7 it 1377 [भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

New Delhi , the 9th February, 2010

S.O. 687.-In Pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 110/2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 . Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . B.C.C.L. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 9-2-2010.

[No. L- 20012/448 / 99 - IR (C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer shows that he has been assigned the job to look after the job ofdomestic coal distribution and Ext. W- 6 shows that the concerned workman was directed to work to Sr. P.O.'s Office at Kusunda Colliery also for doing domestic coal distribution work . As per Ext . M- 2 dated 25-5-99 he was regularised as Clerk Grade - III . After completion of three years a person who is working in Grade- III will be promoted to Clerk Grade - II as per company's scheme for ministerial staff known as cadre scheme. But it requires D.P.C. but D.P.C. has not been conducted by the management for the reason best known by the management . It only shows that he is entitled for promotion as Clerk Grade - II from 25-5-2002 as per Cadre scheme, Ext . M -3 .

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . I , DHANBAD

In the matter of a reference U /s . 10 ( 1 ) ( d) (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Reference No. 110 of 2000

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of M / s . B.C.C.L's PootkiColliery.

Their Workmen

Present : H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer APPEARANCES

None

For the Employers :

As per Ext . W-1 when he was promoted to clerk it only shows that he has been promoted in Despatch Section and it has also been written that after adjudging his suitability and on completion of one year of service his case shall be re - examined and if he will not be found successful , he will be reverted back to his original job . But no office order has been filed by the management which may show that he was reverted and not found fit for the post of clerk. It only shows that as per Ext . W - 1 when he was promoted on 21-10-91 in clerical grade then he is entitled for promotion to Clerk Grade - III as per Cadre Scheme , Ext. M - 3 . Though he was transferred from this Collieryto another Colliery, but the management is the same , BCCL . An employee cannot be suffered on the ground that he wastransferred by the management from one area to another area, but as per office order dated 2-7-99, Ext . W- 4/ 1 , he was regularised as Dumpman /Tripman in Clerical Grade - HI w.e.f. 25-6-99 and as per Cadre Scheme , Ext . M - 3 , after three years experience as Clerk Grade - III he is entitled for promotion in Clerk Grade - II i.e. from 25-6-2002.

For the Workman :

None

9. Accordingly, I render the following award-

State: Jharkhand

AND Industry: Coal

Dated, the 2nd February, 2010

AWARD

The demand of the NCWC from the management of Kusunda Area of M /s . BCCL for regularising Sri Bijay Kumar Paswan in Clerical Grade and subsequently upgradingto Clerical Grade - II is fair and justified and hence the management is directed to upgrade the concerned workman to Clerical Grade - II with effect from 25-6-2002 and pay difference of wages from that date .

This is my award .

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 9 फरवरी , 2010

By its Order No. L - 20012 /448/99 - IR ( C - I ) dated 17-2-2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of section 10 of the IndustrialDisputes Act , 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

"Whether the demand of the union before the Management of Pootki Colliery under P.B. Area of M/ s . BCCL to regularise Sri Besant Lal Pasi as Security Guard with consequential benefits is proper and justified ? Ifyes, to what relief and consequential benefit is the workman entitled and from what date?" का.आ. 687.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बी.सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 110/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-2-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल-20012/448/99 - आईआर ( सी -1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

2. This reference case is of the year 2000. Inspite of sending notices to the parties neither the sponsoring union nor the concerned workınan appeared before this Tribunal to take any step or to file written statement on behalf of the 1378

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 /PHALGUNA 15,1931

[PART 11- SEC . 3 (ii) ] concerned workman . It , therefore , seems that neither the sponsoring union nor the concerned workman is interested to contest the case .

section ( 1 ) and sub - section ( 2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal

In such circumstances , I render a 'No Dispute ' Award inthe present reference case .

H.N. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2010

"Whether the demand of Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union to regularise Sri Baradhan Roy as control Panel Operator in Katras Project of M / s . BCCL, is just and proper? If so , to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from what date?"

2. This is the case of the year 2000. But inspite of notice being sent to the sponsoring union / workman by speed post , none appeared till 1-10-2009 to take any step or to file written statement on behalf of the concerned workman . It , therefore , appears that neither the sponsoring union nor the concerned workman is interested to contest the case.

का.आ. 688. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बी.सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 152/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-2-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

In such circumstances , I render a 'No Dispute' Award in the present reference case . H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 9 फरवरी , 2010 [सं. एल-20012/522/99- आईआर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 9th February, 2010

का.आ. 689.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बी.सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं. । , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 190/94 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-2-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

S.O. 688. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 152/2000 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 , Dhanbad , now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M / s . B.C.C.L. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 9-2-2010.

[No. L - 20012 /522 /99 - IR ( C - I ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

[सं. एल-20012/284/93- आईआर (सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 9th February , 2010 BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . I, DHANBAD

In the matter of a reference U/s . 10 ( 1 ) ( d) (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 .

Reference No. 152 of 2000

Parties:

Employers in relation to the management of M / s . B.C.C.L'S Katreas Area .

S.O. 689. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 190/94 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . B.C.C.L. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 9-2-2010.

AND Their Workmen

[No. L- 20012/284/93 - IR (C - I )] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

Present : H.M. SINGH , Presiding Officer APPEARANCES

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. I, DHANBAD For the Employers : None For the Workmen : None

State: Jharkhand

Industry: Coal

In the matter of a reference U/ s . 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) ( 2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Reference No. 190 of 1994 Dated, the 1st February , 2010 AWARD

By Order No. L - 20012/522 / 99- ( C - I ) dated 3-3-2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub-

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Kenduadih Colliery ofM / s . BCCL . AND [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1379 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

TheirWorkmen

Present: H.M. SINGH , Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES

For the Employers Shri S. N. Sinha , Advocate

For the Workmen: Shri T.P. Jha , Advocate

State: Jharkhand

Industry:Coal

Dated, the 28th February , 2010

AWARD

had put in requisite number of attandence during the year 1973 to 1976 have been regularised . It has been stated that it was one time arrangement for meeting the requirement of underground piece rated miner / leaders . Now there is no such requirement of such worker and the company is having surplus manpower and is trying to reduce the same introducing Voluntary Retirement Scheme and Golden Hand Shake and spending crores of Rupees only to reduce the supply man power . There is no further scope for increasing the man power .

In view of the above facts , the employer pray before thisHon'ble Tribunal be pleased to pass an award holding that the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief whatsoever .

By Order No. L- 20012/284/93 / IR ( C - I ) , dated 28-7-1994 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d ) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

4. Both the parties have filed their respective rejoinders admitting and denying the contents of some of the paragraphs of each other's written statement .

"Whether the action of the management of Kenduadih Colliery of BCCL , in denying employment to Sri Rameshwar Ram , delisted Casual Wegon Loader , is justified ? If not , to what relief the workman isentitled for ? "

5. The concerned workman has produced Judagir Paswan as MW- 1 . The workman also produced MW - 2 ---- Motilal Paswan and the concerned workman produced himself as MW - 1 .

The management has produced MW- 1-Ravi Sekhar Singh who proved the documents as Exts . -M1 and M - 2 and the management also produced MW - 2- Satish Chandra Tiwary.

2. Written statement has been filed on behalf of the workman stating that the concerned workman , Rameshwar Ram was working as a Casual Wagon loader at Kenduadih Colliary of M/ s. BCCL , during the years 1973-76 . As per policy decision taken by Joint Consultative Committee of BCCL, a large number of casual wagon loaders who put 75 days attendance during 1973-76 were regularised by the management of BCCL as miner / loader . But though in the list prepared by Kendwadih colliery of such delisted casual wagon leaders the name of the concerned workman was included but he was not absorbed as miner /loader . The concerned workman has constantly been requesting the management of Kendwadih colliery of BCCL to absorb him permanently as per policy decision of the company but without any effect. Seeing no other alternative an industrial dispute was raised resulting with the present reference.

It has been prayed that the concerned workman should be taken into employment with all monetary benefit and full back wages w.e.f. January , 1980 with adequate compensation for wilful and deliberate harassment by the management of Kendwadih colliery of M/ s . BCCL .

6. Argument advenced on behalf of the workman that the other workman working at Kendwadih Colliery alongwith the concerned workman , who have put75 days attandance during the year 1973-76 as casual wagon loader have been regularised as miner / loader but the concerned workman has not been regularised. As per policy decision taken by Joint Consultative Committee of BCCL that delisted wagon loaders having put in 75 days attendance during 1973-76 willbe absorbed permanently by the management as miner / loader and accordingly , a large number of delisted casual wagon loaders were absorbed permanently as miner/ loader , but though the name of the concerned workman was included in the list of delisted casual wagon loaders but he has been left out but other persons, Moitilal Paswan , Jadagir Paswan , Girja Shaw , Ram Saran Paswan and Jugal Paswan who were working as delisted casual wagon loaders alongwith the concerned workman , have been absorbed permanently as miner/ loader , but the concerned workman has not been regularised . It shows adamant attitude of the management .

7. In this respect the management's representative argued that he was working with the management any day, but his name has been fabricated and he cannot be given employment as miner / loader .

2. The management has filed written statement stating that the concerned workman never worked in any capacity in the colliery as his name does not appear in the Statutory Register of the colliery viz . Form ' B ' Register , I.D. Card , Bonus Register and other register form ' C ' .He was also not the member of the C.M.P.F. The above dispute is not an industrial dispute under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as there was no employer- emplolyee relation between the management and the concerned workman . Therefore , this dispute is not maintainable in law . As per guideline circulated by the company all the casual employees who

8. In this respect it has been argued by the concerned workman that ' X ' for identification contains his name , but it does not bear signature of the Agent of the colliery. It is fabricated document and this Ext . M -2 is letter 1380

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: MARCH 6 , 2010/ PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

dated 6-1-92 . In this respect the management's witness MW- 1 stated that this does not bear his signature which has been marked ' X ' for identification . Moreover , he has also stated that the name of the concerned workman does not find place in Form ' E ' Register or I.D. Card register of thecolliery.

9. The concerned workman ( WW- 3 ) has stated in cross - examination that " I have got no paper to show that I have worked in the colliery from the year 1973 to 1976 , "WW- 2, Motilal Paswan , stated in cross - examination that " I have been working at Kendwadih Colliery and I have got I.D. Card but I have not brought the same today. " He has not filed any paper to show that he is working with the management . WW- 1 , Judagir Paswan , stated in cross- examination that " My regularisation has been done in 1984. I have got my I.D. Card , but I have not brought that . Provident fund deduction is made from my pay . Monthly wage slip is also with my which I can file " . But it has not been filed with the Tribunals .

10. No paper has been filed by the concerned workman to show that he has worked with the management sothat his case may be considered for absorption as wagon loader . Motilal Paswan may have worked as pay slip has been filed for WW- 1 , but it does not mean that the concerned workman also worked with Motilal Paswan . The list which has been filed on behalf of the workman ' X ' for identification does not show to be genuine paper . It only shows that this paper has been manufactured for the purposes of the present case .

In view of the discussions made above , I find no merit in the present case .

11. Accordingly, I render the following award- The action ofthe management Kenduadih Colliery of BCCL in denyig employment to Sri Ramashwar Ram , delisted casual Wagon Loader , is justified and the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief.

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , ।। फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 690.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार नेशनल इंश्योरेन्स कम्पनी लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 31 ऑफ/ 1992 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-2-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

|सं. एल-17012/60/91- आईआर ( बी -11 ) ] यू. एस . पाण्डेय , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 11th February , 2010 S.O. 690. -In Pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central

[PART- 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ] Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No.31 of 1992) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of National Insurances Co. Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 9-2-2010.

[No. 1-17012/60/ 91 - IR ( B - II ) ] U. S. PANDEY, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. I. DHANBAD Present : Shri H.M. SINGH , Presiding Officer In the matter of an Industrial Dispute Under section 10 (1) (d) of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947.

Reference No. 31 of 1992

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of National Insuarance Co. Ltd. Muzaffarpur and their workman.

APPEARANCES

Onbehalf ofthe worikman : Mr. S. N. Goswami , Advocate . Onbehalf of the employers: Mr. R. R. Bhattacharya ,

Advocate .

State : Jharkhand

Industry : Insurance Dated, Dhanbad, the 27th January , 2010

AWARD

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour , in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10( 1)(d) of the I.D. Act . , 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L - 17012/60/91-1.R . ( B - 2 ) dated the 10th April , 1992 .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of National Insurance Co. Ltd. Muzaffarpur of terminating the services of Sh . Ram Snehi Bhagat and rejecting the claim of his reinstatement of services is legal and justified? If not , to what relief is the workman entitled?"

2. The case of the workman is that the concerned workman joined Muzaffarpur Divisional Office of the National Insurance Company Limited on 14-11-1979 as whole time casual worker and worked till 31-8-1985 with interruption on different occasions at the instance of the management . It has been further stated that the concerned workman has worked with a maximum period of 192 days continuously from Ist May, 1984 to 31st October , 1984 without any interruption but was discontinued suddenly after 31st October , 1984 with a malafide intention to frustrate the provisions of Section 25B of the I.D. Act. , 1947 though [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

1381

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

worked and payment made to him vouchers. The particulars areas follows :-

Period year

other such daily rated casual employees who joined in the establishment after this workman were allowed to continue work. Thereafter the concerned workman approached the General Secretary of Bihar State General Insurance Employee's Association (hereinafter rereferred to as Association) to look into his case , who accordingly espoused his case before the management , but that too was without any effect .

3. It has been alleged by the workman that after termination of the concerned workman many other casual employees who were junior to him were regularised in service of the management and thus the management has violated the principle of natural justice . It has been further alleged that the management has failed to follow the provisions of the Section 25G and 25H of the I.D. Act . , and also failed to fulfil the mandatory provisions of Rules 77, 78 and 79 of the Central Rules framed under the Act . It has been stated by the concerned workman that management has recruited many persons from and amongst the casual employees working in the Company and also from the open market whose names are given below :---

OpenMarket

(a) Arun Kumar

(b) Rabindra Paswan

(d) Thakur Rabidas and others .

Regularised casual

(a) Basudeo Gope

employee

(b) Satya Narayan Thakur

(d) Kapil Deo Prasad

(e) Krishna Thakur and others .

It has been alleged that the action of the management is against the doctrine of Natural Justice and is in violation ofArt. 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India .

It has been prayed on behalf of the workman to pass anAward for the appointment of the concerned workman in permanent cadre in view of regularisation of other casual workers and new appointment in the Company from the date of first regularisation of casual employees .

4. In the Written Statement filed on behalf of the management it has been stated that the reference is not legally maintainable both in fact as well as in the eye of law. It has been further stated that the concerned workman was engaged in Muzaffarpur Divisional Office of National Insurance Co. Ltd. as casual Badli worker for some time in the year 1979 to 1985 particularly for summer season for sprinkling water on Khas Khas for two to three hours in a day part time job who was not required to work for whole time for which he was ordinarily required to work and was paid on the basis of workdone . The management have furnished the particulers regarding the days or which he No. ofdays

Paidby voucher 1979

17 days

No. 118 dt . 30-11-79 Rs. 253.30 1982

No. 785 Rs . 105.00 102 days

8-6-82

1983

No. 579

123 days

1-6-83 Rs . 1230.00

No. 809

1-7-83

No. 1110

1-11-83

1994

No.407

192days

30-4-84

No.504

No. 960

31-5-84

29-9-94

No. 603

No. 1054

29-6-84 Rs . 1920.00 5-11-84

No. 718

31-7-84

10844

31-8-44

1985

No. 487 Rs . 260.00 41 days

No. 694 Rs . 165.00 The management have asserted that the concerned workman was neither assigned with any work nor he had worked 240 days even in one calender year during the period.

5. The management have admitted that the concerned workman was working for some times against the contractual and casual nature during the period of 1979 to 1985 as and when required basis but he never completed 240 days of continuous service in any calender year during the above years . It has been stated by the management thatthe present dispute is not legally maintainable within the purview ofthe definition of Industrial Dispute U/s . 2A ofthe I.D. Act and also barred by limitation of inordinate delay of 5 years . It has been stated by the management that there is no relationship between the Employer and Employee i.e. Insurance Company and the concerned workman , therefore the present reference is void and infructuous . There is no merit in the present reference and the same is liable to be summarily dismissed. Prayer has been made on behalf ofthe management to pass an Award rejecting the claim of the concerned workman .

1382

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/ PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[ PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 6. Both the parties have filed their respective rejoinders admitting and denying the contents of some of the paras of each other's written statement .

In view of the facts , evidence and circumstances discussed above I find no merit in the claim of the concerned workman and accordingly he is not entitled to get any relief. In the result, the following Award is rendered :---

"The action of the management ofNational Insurance Company Ltd. Mazaffarpur of terminating the services of Sh . Ram Snehi Bhagat and rejecting the claim of his reinstatement of services is legal and justified. Consequently the concerned workman is not entitled to get any relief. "

7. In order to substantiate their case management have produced Shri R. K. Sahu who has been examined as MW- 1 . On behalf of the workman Ram Snehi Bhagat , Santonarain Thakur and Shiv Kant Jha have been examined as WW - 1 , WW- 2 and WW- 3 respectively and on their behalf documents have been marked as Ext. W- 1 to W-4 . Nodocument has been produced and marked on behalf of the management .

H. M. SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 11 फरवरी , 2010 8. It has been argued on behalf of the concerned workman that he was working from 14-11-1979 and he worked till 31-8-1985 in the office of the National Insurance Corporation in Muzaffarpur Branch as Badli Sub- Staff regularly . It has also been argued that some persons junior to him have been made permanent and he has been retrenched. So he should be regularised.

का.आ. 691.- राष्ट्रपति , श्री अशोक कुमार रस्तोगी को 1-2-2010 से केंद्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक न्यायाधिकरण- सह- श्रम न्यायालय संख्या-2 , चंडीगढ़ , के पीठासीन अधिकारी के रूप में 65 वर्ष की आयु पूरी होने अर्थात् 31-7-2013 तक अथवा अगले आदेशों तक , जो भी पहले हो , नियुक्त करती है।

[सं. ए-11016/2/2008-सीएलएस -11] पी. के. ताम्रकर , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 11th February, 2010

S.O. 691. The President is pleased to appoint Shri Ashok Kumar Rastogi as Presiding Officer of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum - Labour Court No. 2, Chandigarh w.e.f. 1-2-2010 till he attains the age 65 years i.e. upto 31-7-2013 or until further orders , whichever is earlier.

[No. A- 11016/2/2008 - CLS - 11 ]

P. K. TAMRAKAR , Under Secy. नई दिल्ली , 12 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 692.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. । , दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 50/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-2-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

9. Management counsel argued that he has not completed 240 days in any calender year . So he cannot be regularised . Other persons who have completed 240 days in a year they have been regularised . In this respect the statement of the concerned workman , WW- 1 is very much important . WW- 1 in his cross - examination at page - 2 has stated " my name had not been recommended through Employment Exchange . I was engaged to work as Badli Peon. I was paid my wages through voucher . I was not registered with Employment Exchange . The photo copy of Ext. W- 1 was given to me by the Secretary of the Union . " WW-2 Satanarain Thakur has stated in cross - examination " I have not brought document with me to show that I am working in that office . I do not remember the exact year in which the concerned workman had worked in the office . He used to be put to work by the management , say for 10 to 15 days and then he was stopped after sometime. " WW-3 Shiv Kant Jha also stated in his cross - examination at page - 2 . "The concerned workman had not shown me any interview letter but had shown me orders in which he was put to work on Badli basis . " No appointment letter has been filed by the concerned workman neither his name has been recommended by the Employment Exchange . There is no document filed on behalf of the concerned workman to show that he has worked 240 days in a calender year . The concerned workman died on 7-2-2008 as per photo copy of death certificate . As per Ext . W - 2 his employment was regrettedby the management only on the ground that he had not completed 240 days in a year.

[सं. एल -12012/ 134/2004- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] यू. एस. पाण्डेय, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 12th February, 2010

S.O. 692. -In Pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 50/2004 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to There is no doubt that he was working with the management as casual worker on whole time basis but when he has not completed 240 days in a year he could not be offered employment . He has worked only 123 days in 1983, 192 days in 1984 and 62 days in 1985. Thus they show that the concerned workman has not completed more than 240 days in any calender year .

1383 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 6 , 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

the management of Bank of India and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 11-2-2010.

[No. L -12012/134/2004 - IR ( B - II) ]

U. S. PANDEY , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

3. Contest was given to his claim by the bank pleading that there was no relationship of employer arid employce between the parties . It was disputed that he was engaged as a water boy - cum- peon on 1-5-95 . It is denied that his services were dispensed with on 1-6-2003 . It has further been denied that action of the bank amounted to retrenchment. It has been claimed that when there was no relationship of employer and employee between the par- ties, there was no occasion for the bank to give any notice or pay in lieu thereof to the claimant . The bank pleads that his claim statement deserves dismissal .

BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1 , KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX DELHI

4. On pleadings of the parties following issues were settled.

I.D. No. 50/2004

1. Whether there exist employer and employee relationship between the parties .

2. As in terms of reference .

Workman

Puran Mal S /o Shri Roop Lal , Village and P.O. Tigaon , Bhim Basti , Faridabad , Haryana .

Versus

5. Puran Mal (WW1 ) , Mahender Singh ( WW2) , G.L.Arora (WW3 ), Bal Chand (WW4 ) and Karan (WW5 ) were examined on behalf of the claimant . Suman Kumar Chhabra ( MW 1 ) was examined on behalf of the manage- ment.

Management

The Manager, Bank ofIndia , Branch -Tigaon, Faridabad.

AWARD

6.Arguments were heard at the bar . Shri Amar Singh , authorized representative , advanced arguments on behalf ofthe workman . Shri Rajat Arora , authorized representa- tive , raised his submissions on behalf of the management . I have given my careful considerations to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record. My findings on issues involved in the controversy are as follows:

ISSUE No. 1

Puran Mal was employed as a seasonal worker at Tigaon branch of Bank of India, to fetch water during sum- mer season . He worked in the bank for 3-4 seasons . When his services were not engaged thereafter , he raised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer . Since conciliation proceedings , failed;, appropriate Government referred the dispute'to this Tribunal for adjudication vide orderNo.L- 120 12/ 134/2004 - IR (B - II ), New Delhi dated 29th of September , 2004, with the following terms:

"Whether the action of the management of Bank of India in terminating the services of Puran Mal , S/ o Shri Roop Lal water carrier - cum- peon w.e.f. 6-2-2003 is just and legal ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ?"

7. Though Puran Mal swears in his affidavit that he was engaged as water boy - cum-peon at Tigaon Branch of Bank of India on daily wages on 1-5-95 and worked there till 6-2-2003 , yet he could not dispel facts testified by Shri G.L.Arora , Bal Chand and Karan Singh. Shri G. L. Arora projects that he served as Deputy Manager in Tigaon branch ofthe bank from 2000 till, 2002. Puran Mal was en- gaged as water boy in that branch at different spells in two years .He was engaged for about 60-70 days only. Bal Chand gives confirmation to facts testified by Shri Arora . He un- folds that in 1996 Puran Mal was engaged in the month of May, June and July in the bank as a casual labour . He presents that his services were engaged for those three months in every season for 2-3 years . Karan Singh also projected those very facts . He presents that Puran Mal was engaged in the bank for 4 months in every season , as awater boy. Therefore , facts projected by the witnesses of the claimant high light that he was engaged as a seasonal employee.

8. Shri Suman Kumar Chhabra deposed that claim- antwas engaged as a casual employee to do odd jobs , as and when exigency arose . He was never engaged as a regular 2.Claim statement was filed by Puran Mal pleading therein that he was engaged at Tigaon branch of Bank of India in the capacity ofwater boy - cum -peon on 1-5-95 . Не was paid @ Rs.75 per day . His services were dispensed with on6-2-2003 , without assigning any reason. He continuously worked for a period of 7 years and 6 months with the bank . No notice or pay in lieu thereof was given to him . No retrenchment compensation was paid to him. Action of the bank amounts to retrenchment of his services . His retrenchment is in violation of the provisions of Section ' 25 F of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 (inshort the Act ) . He claims reinstatement in service with continuity and full back wages .

688 GI /10-17 1384

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/ PHALGUNA 15,1931

[PART 11- SEC. 3 ( ii )| employee of the bank . He presents that he might have been engaged for a period of 100 or 125 days in four years . He was paid @ Rs.75 per day. He denied that Puran Mal was engaged as water boy- cum- peon from 1-5-95 and worked continuously till6-2-2003 . He concludes that he never rendered continuous service for 240 days in a calen- dar year.

a work of permanent nature and a temporary workman en- gaged on a work of permanent nature is, in fact , that a temporary workman is engaged to fill in a temporary need ofextra hands of permanentjobs . Thus when a workman is engaged on a work of permanent nature which lasts through- out the year , it is expected that he would continue there permanently unless he is engaged to fill in a temporary need. In other words a workman is entitled to expect per- manency of his service . Law to this effect was laid by the Apex Court in Jaswant Sugar Mills ( 1961 ( 1 ) LLJ 649 ) .

Therefore, out of facts projected bythese witnesses , it came to light that Puran Mal was engaged as a seasonal employee to work as a water boy during summer season .

12. As per the case of the workman his name was not called from the employment exchange to appoint him as water boy- cum- peon. Witnesses depose that time and again he was appointed in summer season to work as water boy by the bank . It has not been shown by the workman that he was appointed against a permanent vacancy.or against a work of perennial in nature . Consequently it is evident that the workman was appointed against a work of temporary nature only . A temporary workman would not acquire permanency of tenure merely because he is em- ployee in a permanent department or given some benefit ordinarily enjoyed by the permanent workman . Such propo- sition was laid in Rohtas Industries Limited Vs. Brijnandan Pandey ( 1956 ( 2) LLJ 444 ) .

9. The relationship of employer and employee is constituted by a contract , express or implied between em- ployer and employee . A contract of service is one in which a person undertakes to serve another and to obey his rea- sonable orders within the scope of the duty undertaken . A contract of employment may be inferred from the conduct which goes to show that such a contract was intended although never expressed and when there has , in fact , been employment of the kind usually performed by the employees . Any such inference , however , is open to rebuttal as by showing that the relation between the parties concerned was on a charitable footing or the parties were relations or partners or were directors of a limited company which employed no staff. While the employee , at the time, when his services were engaged, need not have known the identity of his employer , there must have been some act or contract by which the parties recognized one another as master or servant .

13. Some casual workmen employed in a Canteen , raised demand of permanency in service. The . Tribunal directed that from particular date they should be treated as probationer and appointed in permanent vacancy without going into the question as to whether more than perma- nent workmen were necessary to be appointed in the can- teen, over and above the existing permanent strength to justify the making of the casual workman as permanent , where they were working . Neither there was any perma- nent vacancy inexistence nor the Tribunal directed for cre- ation of new posts . When the matter reached the Apex Court , it was announced that the Tribunal was not justified in making these directions . The workman may be made permanent only against permanent vacancies and not otherwise , announced the Apex Court in Hindustan Aeronautics Limited Vs. their workmen ( 1975 ( 11 ) LLJ 336) .

10.As testified by the claimant and his witnesses , he was engaged as water boy by the bank during summer seasons only . His services were engaged for the months ofMay, June and July every year from 1999 to 2002. Shri Suman Kumar Chhabra also gave confirmation to those facts.He was paid for the actual days of his work . Hence it is evident that the claimant was engaged by the bank by way of express contract. There was existing a right in favour ofthe bank to supervise and control his work not only in the matter ofdirecting what work he was to do but also the manner in which he was to do his work . These facts make it clear that there was a relationship of employer and em- ployee between the claimant and the bank . The issue is , therefore , answered in favour of the claimant and against thebank.

ISSUE No. 2

14. In Uma Devi ( 2006 ( 4 ) SCC I ) the Apex Court con- sidered the proposition as to whether the persons who got employment , without following of a regular procedure or even from the back door or on daily wages can be ordered to be made permanent in their posts , to prevent regular recruitment to the posts concerned. Catena of decisions over the subject were considered and the court declined the submissions of the workmen to be made permanent on the posts which were held by them in temporary or adhoc capacity for a fairly long spell . The Court ruled thus:

11. As detailed above , claimant was employed in summer seasons by the bank . He worked as a seasonal workman for a few years . A ' seasonal workman ' is engaged in a job which lasts during a particular season only. While a temporary workman may be engaged either for a work of temporary or casual nature or temporarily for work of a permanent nature , but a permanent workman is one who is engaged in a work of permanent nature only . The distinction between permanent workman engaged on

"With respect, why should the State be allowed to depart from the normal . rule and in- dulge in temporary employment in permanent posts? This Court , in our view , is bound to 1385 भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च6, 2010/फाल्गुन. 15, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

162 of the Constitution , if the appointments have been made in contravention of the statutory rules . In Somveer Singh (2006 5 SCC 493 ) the Apex Court ruled that appoint- ment made without following due procedure cannot be regularized.

17. Since the claimant was employed during sum- mer season as a casual water man and rendered service for intermittent periods , he had not acquired status of an in- dustrial employee . He had not rendered 120 days service within a period of six months . Therefore , continuous ser- vice either for a period of six months or a year , as contem- plated by the provision of section 25 - B ofthe Act , was not rendered by him . When his services were disengaged, it did not amount to retrenchment within clause ( oo) of Sec- tion 2 of the Act . Action of the bank can not be faulted on the standards of legality or propriety . Issue is , therefore , answered in favour of the bank and against the claimant.

RELIEF

insists on the State making regular and proper recruitments , and is bound not to encourage or shut its eyes to the persistent transgression of the rules of regular recruitment . The directionto make permanent the distinction between regu- larization and making permanent , was not empha- sized here - can only encourage the State, the modal employer, to flout its own rules and would confer undue benefits on a few at the cost of many wait- ing to compete. With respect the directions made in Piara Singh ( 1992(4) SCC 118 ) is to some extent inconsistent with the conclusion in para 45 ofthe said judgment therein . With great respect , it ap- pears to us that the last of the directions clearly runs counter to the constitutional scheme of em- ployment recognized in the earlier part of the de- cision . Really, it cannot be said that this decision has laid down the law that all ad - hoc , temporary or casual employees engaged without following a regular recruitment procedure should be made permanent . "

15. Taking note of some of recent deci- sions , the Apex court held that the State does not enjoy a power to make appointments in terms of article 162 of the Constitution. The Court quoted its decision in Girish Jyanti Lal Vaghela (2006 (2 ) SCC 482) with approval , wherein it was ruled thus .

18. Being a seasonal employee who had not ren- dered continuous service for six months or one year , as contemplated by Section 25 B of the Act , the claimant can- not expect relief of reinstatement when the services came to an end, on expiry of his term of contract He is not en- titled for any relief. His claim petition is accordingly dis- missed . An award is passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication .

Dated: 29-1-2010

DR . R. K YADAV , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 12 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 693.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सिंडिकेट बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. । , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 13/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11-2-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -12012/133/2000- आईआर( बी -11 ) ]

यू. एस. पाण्डेय , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 12th February , 2010 "The appointment to any post under the State can only be made after a proper advertise- ment has been made inviting applications from eligible candidates and holding of a selection by a body of experts or a specially constituted committee whose members are fair and impartial through a written examination or interview or some other rational criteria for judging the inter se merit of candidates who have applied in response to the advertisement made . A regular appointment to the post under the State or Union cannot be made without issuing advertisement in the prescribed manner which may in some cases include inviting applications from the employment exchange, where eligible candidate get their names registered. Any regular appointment made on a post under the State or Union without issuing advertisement inviting applications from eligible candidates and without holding a proper selec- tion where all eligible candidates get a fair chance to compete would violate the guarantee enshrined under Article 16 of the Constitution"

S.O. 693. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 13/2001 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal Labour Court , No , 1 , Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in 16.In P.Chandra Shekhara Rao and Others ( 2006 7 SCC 488 ) the Apex Court referred Uma Devi's Case ( supra) with approval . It also relied the decision in Uma Rani (2004 7 SCC 112 ) and ruled that no regularization is permis- sible in exercise of statutory powers conferred in Article 1386

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 /PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

relation to the management of Syndicate Bank and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 11-2-2010 .

[No. L- 12012 /133 /2000- IR ( B - II ) ]

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii) ] (ii) He destroyed/ caused destruction of Postal Journal pertaining to the period 28-04-97 to 4-12-97 to conceal you fraudulent acts . It was apprehended that the amount fraudulently drawn may further increase.

U. S. PANDEY, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT-1 , CHANDIGARH

Case ID . No. 13/2001

Sh . Balbir Singh , 2159 , Shri Guru Nanak Colony, Vadala Rd . , Tehsil : Kharar Ropar (Punjab ) .

Applicant

Versus

The Asst . General Manager , Syndicate Bank , 6-Bhagwan Dass Road , Sarojini House , New Delhi- 110001

Respondent.

APPEARANCES

For the Workman

ShriY.P.Singh .

For the Managemert:

Shri Vipan Mahajan .

AWARD

Passed on: 3-2-10

Government of India vide notification no . L - 12012/ 133/2000/IR ( B - II ) , dated 24-11-2000 , by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act. (the Act in short) has referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

"Whether the action of the management of Syndicate Bank in terminating the services of their workman Shri Balbir singh , Clerk w.e.f. 1-8 - .98 is just and legal ? If not , what relief the workman is en- titled?"

After receiving the reference , parties were informed. Parties appeared and filed their respective pleadings . On perusal of the pleadings of both of the parties , it is evident thatworkman was charge sheeted on 27-07-98 for fraudu- lently withdraw an amount of Rs . 53,222 during the period from 6-8-95 to 12-11-1995 and from 28-4-97 to 4-12-97 as mentioned in postal outward register .

From the perusal of the pleadings of the parties , it is also evidently clear that workman was alleged to commit the above irregularities as follows :-

(i ) He misappropriated a sum of Rs . 53,222 belong- ing to the Bank , through various fraudulent means while working in dispatch section .

(iii) He fabricated certain records by resorting to dubious means to facilitate his fraudulent acts .

(iv) He violated the guidelines stipulated in Article No. 39.1.62(4) of WOI , Volume IV to facilitate the frauds and their concealment.

The workman has challenged the enquiry report , pun- ishment order and the order of the appellate authority on the ground that adequate opportunity of being heard was not given to him. He has not committed any misconduct by withdrawing the amount in question . It was also alleged by the workman that failure of department to detect the fraud allegedly to be committed for a long period justified his contention. He was punished hypothetically without any evidence against him .

It is admitted that charge sheet was given to the workman on 27-7-1998 . It is also admitted that a depart- mental enquiry was conducted .It is also admitted and proved by the materials on record that workman and his defence representative appeared before enquiry officer on all the dates fixed for hearing of departmental enquiry. It is the allegation of the workman that proper opportunity of being heard was not given . This is the allegation and con- tention in garlanding words . Workman has failed to men- tion the instances which proved even prima facie that he was not afforded the opportunity of being heard .

I have gone through the evidence written and docu- mentary and all the materials on record. Enquiry report and proceedings of enquiry are on record. The management of the bank produced , only one witness before Enquiry Officer and the witness was Shri Madan M. W.I who has categorically in his chief- examination narrated that though the amounts were claimed by the workman as postal charges , whereas some of the posts were not send by the workman. " The witness was cross - examinedby the de- fence representative in detail . I have gone through the chief examination and cross - examination of the witness M.W.1 Shri S. Madan. He has specifically narrated in clear terms how the amount was claimed by the workman which was in fact not use for official purposes .

Onperusal of the materials on record, it is also evi- dent that opportunity for adducing evidence in defence was also afforded to the workman . Proceedings of enquiry makes it clear that workman refused to avail the opportu- nity . He was also afforded the opportunity for submitted the written briefs .

I have also gone through the report of enquiry sub- mitted by the enquiry officer . After perusal of the entire भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुनं 15 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

enquiry proceedings and the enquiry report in my view there is no scope for this Tribunal to interfere in the find- ings given by the enquiry officer.

The copy of the enquiry report was provided with to the workman . He was also given a show cause notice with proposed punishment . After affording the opportu- nity of hearing the disciplinary authority awarded the pun- ishment of tennination of the workman from the services . The workman preferred an appeal which was dismissed by the appellate authority.

1387 ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM -LABOUR COURT JABALPUR

No. CGIT /LC/ R/ 54 /91

Presiding Officer : Shri Mohd. Shakir Hasan

The General Secretary ,

Bhartiya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Sangh (BMS) ,

Chirimiri , PO Haldibadi ,

Workman/Union

Distt. Surguja (MP)

Versus

Deputy ChiefMining Engineer ,

West Chirimiri Colliery of SECL,

PO Chirimiri ,

Management

Distt . Surguja (MP)

The charges which is proved against the workman is regarding withdrew an amount of Rs . 53,222 in a long time as a postal charges , whereas the amount withdrew was not used for official purposes for dispatching posts by the workman. It is a gross misconduct and in my view the punishment awarded is in proportionate to the committed misconduct.

Thus , for the reasons mentioned above , I am of the view that no interference in the findings of the enquiry officer and in the punishment awarded is warranted . The workman is not entitled for any relief. The reference is answered accordingly. Let Central Government be informed for publication of award , and thereafter, file be consigned to record room.

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 12 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 694.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं एस. ई. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 54/91 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-02-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22012/158/1988- आईआर( सी- II ) ]

अजय कुमार गौड , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 12th February, 2010 S.O. 694. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 54/91 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum - Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of SECL and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 12-02-2010.

[No. L - 22012/158 / 1988 - IR ( C - II ) ]

AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer

AWARD

Passed on this 5th day of February , 2010 1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide itsNotification No. L - 22012/ 158 / 88 - D - IV ( B ) dated 3-4-91 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :---

"Whether the action of the management of West Chirimiri Colliery of Chirimiri Area of SECL in dismissing their workman Shri Mahesh Kumar Gupta, Tub -Writer , vide letter No. WC / 78 / 7/88 dated 18-1-1988 is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled and from what date ?" 2. The case of the Union/workman in short is that the workman Shri Mahesh Kumar Gupta Tub - Writer was permanent employee of the management of West Chirimiri Colliery of SECL and was also Deputy General Secretary of Bhartiya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Sangh ( BMS ) . He was illegally terminated from the service vide letter No. WC/ 78 / 7/88 dated 18-1-1988 . He is said to have been victimized for his legitimate Trade Union activities. It is stated that he was chargesheeted but simultaneously disciplinary action andthe criminal case were initiated against him . The further case is that as contained in the chargesheet of the departmental enquiry, on 1-10-1987 at about 11.45 PM, he talked on telephone with Mr. N. S. Sabrawal , Colliery Manager , West Chirimiri Colliery to provide the bus for visiting Sister Collieries on the eve of Puja. When the Manager expressed his inability, he went to his residence and forcibly entered into his bedroom and started behaving with him in riotous and indecent manner and abused him in filthy and unparliamentary languages which are reproduced below:-

"AAP KO GARI DENI PAREGI , GARI AAP KI YA AAP KE BAAP KI NEHI HAI . GARI KAMPANI KI HAI . AGAR AAP GARI NEHI DENGE TO ISKELIYE AAP KO BHUGATNA PAREGA. " 1388

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 / PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[ PART 11 SEC. 3 ( ⅱ)

(ii) If no , what relief the workman is entitled to?

6. Before discussing the evidence on record , the following facts are admitted by the parties:

1. The workman Shri Mahesh Kumar Gupta, Tub -writer, was permanent employce of the management of West Chirimiri Colliery ofSECL...

2. The workman was Deputy General Secretary of Bhartiya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Sangh (BMS).

It is also alleged that he had threatened the Manager er dire consequence against his life and property . hereafter he again came at about 12.15 in the midnight alongwith 10-15 persons and forcibly entered into the residence by scaling over the locked gate and started shouting and knocking the door and continuously ringing the bell . It is also alleged that they had brick batted on the door and window . Ultimately Mr. Sabrawal came outside and then the workman and others shouted and abused him with filthy languages . It is stated that the management has falsely implicated in the instance case and passed order of termination after enquiry . Under the circumstances , the reference be answered in favour of the Workman /Union .

3. He was terminated from the service after domestic departmental proceeding vide letter No. WC/ 78 / 7/ 88 dated 18-1-1988 which is held illegal.

4. Criminal case and departmental proceedings are based on same and similar facts and on similar charges .

5. In the criminal case before the Criminal Court , the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond all reasonable doubts and the workman was , accordingly, acquitted.

6. The departmental enquiry is found not fair and valid by the Tribunal vide order dated 23-2-96 .

7. On 1-10-87 at 11.45 PM , Shri Gupta telephoned the Manager for School Bus to go to sister collieries to witness the Durga Puja .

Issue No. 1 :

3. The management appeared and filed written statement to contest the proceeding . The case of the management , inter alia , is that admittedly the workman Shri Mahesh Kumar Gupta was working as underground Munshi . It is alleged that on 1-10-87 at about 11.45 PM, the workman committed criminal house tresspass by entering into the bed room for asking to provide a bus to visit sisters colliery and on expressing inability to provide the same by the Colliery Manager Shri N. S. Sabrawal , he used filthy language , tried to assault him and threatened him with dire consequences . Thereafter at 12.15 PM , the said workman alongwith 10 or 12 persons again committed house tress pass by scaling over the locked gate and shouted and knocked the door . He continuously rang the bell and brick batted on the doors and windows . When Shri Sabrawal came outside , he was abused with filthy language . The Colliery Manager reported the matter in writing to the competent authority who issued chargesheet . On insufficient reply, the departmental proceeding was constituted. After completion of the domestic enquiry, the EnquiryOfficer submitted enquiry report on 7-12-87 . The competent authority after considering the entire papers passed the order of dismissal from service vide order dated 18-1-88 . It is also admitted that the criminal case was instituted before the police regarding the alleged occurrence on the complaint made by Shri Sabrawal and chargesheet was submitted. It is stated that the criminal case has nothing todo with the disciplinary action . It is submitted that merely because the workman happens to be Trade Union Leader , he had no right to enter into the house of Shri Sabrawal in the midnight and assaulted him and create criminal acts of misconduct. It is submitted that if the departmental enquiry is found illegal and not valid, then the management be permitted to prove the misconduct on merit in the Tribunal .

4. The preliminary issue was taken up on 23-2-96 as to whether the departmental enquiry was legal and valid . It is held that the departmental enquiry was not fair and proper . Thereafter the management is permitted to prove misconduct in court .

5. Now the issues for consideration in the proceeding is as follows:---

(i ) Whether the management is able to prove the misconduct of the workman in court ?

7. Now the burden is on the management to prove misconduct against the workman . Let us examine the evidence of the management . The management has examined in all five witnesses . The Management has also filed Departmental Enquiry papers . Management witness No. 6 is the complainant Shri N. S. Sabrawal , Manager , WestChirimiri Colliery . He has stated in his evidence at Para- 5 that he had made a complaint to this effect to the General Manager , SECL , Chirimiri Area , a copy of which is atPage- 1 of the Departmental Enquiry Papers . He has also made statement before the Enquiry Officer which is to be used as previous statement for the purpose of corroboration or contradiction. He has made his statement before the EnquiryOfficer at page - 29 in the said proceeding wherein he has stated that he complained in writing regarding the occurrence to the General Manager on 2-10-87 . This fact is totally contradicted from the complaint made to the General Managerwhich is at page No. 1 ofthe Departmental Enquiry Paper . The complaint petition shows that it was written on 4-10-87 and was placed before the Dy. CPM on 5-10-87 . This shows that the real complaint filed by the complainant Shri Sabrawal on 2-10-87 was suppressed by the management. It looks probable that the said complaint dated 2-10-87 might have not disclosed any misconduct against the workman . This shows that the basis of the 1389 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

Versus Management of Aurofood Private Limited, Auroville and another wherein the Hon'ble High Court of Madras held that-.

allegation of the entire proceeding appears to be not properly placed and have been concealed for the reason best known to the management .

"Therefore the mere usage of such language cannot itself be , per se , the basis of an order of dismissal . If that be so , the Labour Court , having been vested with the power to interfere with the quantum of punishment such as inflicted upon the petitioner and having failed to exercise such power to interfere with the quantum of punishment imposed upon the petitioner when he was sought to be dismissed from service for very trivial charges , requires this Court to interfere with such order of dismissal that shocks the conscience of this Court , as held in UP State Road Transport Corporation Versus Mahesh Kumar Mishra reported in 2000 (3 )SCC 450 : 2000-1- LLJ - 1113 . "

Thus it is clear that even if it is presumed that the alleged un-parliamentary words were used, the same is not sufficient to such order of dismissal .

10. The Union/ workman also adduced evidence in the case Workman Shri Mahesh Kumar Gupta has stated in his statement that he is office bearer of Central B.K.M.S Union and was Vice- chairman of Durga Puja Samiti . He had a moral liabilities to do effort to provide bus to the workers to visit sister collieries . His entire evidence clearly shows that there is nothing in his evidence to show that Shri Gupta had abused the Mines Manager in the manner has been alleged by the management rather only suggestion is given to the witness in cross - examination that he had used un - parliamentary language and even the exact words are not suggested . None of the witnesses examined on behalf of the Union/workman have supported the facts that Shri Gupta had abused the Mines Manager for not providing the bus . The management has cross examined all these witnesses , at length but there is nothing intheir cross - examination to substantiate that the workman, Shri Gupta had abused and threatened the Mines Manager . The above discussion clearly shows that the management has measurably failed to establish that the workman Shri Gupta , who happens to be Deputy General Secretary ofBhartiya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Sangh ( BMS ) had used un-parliamentary language and threatened the Manager .

8. The another important point is as to whether the workman , Shri Mahesh Kumar Gupta had abused the said Manager in the manner as has been alleged by the management ? If so , then where mere usage of such language may be the basis of an order of dismissal . The written statement of the management shows that it is simply alleged that Shri Gupta abused in filthy manner and at another place in the written statement , it is stated that he abused with filthy language . The exact language used to insult the manager is not pleaded . The case of the management is that the Manager Shri Sabrawal also lodged FIR before the police . The photocopy of the challan of the police is filed which is marked as Exhibit M/ 13 . The said challan shows that FIR was lodged by the Manager on 15-11-87 at 22.30 hours . This shows that the FIR was lodged- after one and half months . The challan (Exhibit M/ 13 ) does not disclose that the workman Shri Gupta had abused the Manager rather it appears that he had simply threatened . The management has also filed photocopy of the deposition of Shri Sabrawal of the criminal case which is marked as Exhibit M/22 . The deposition shows that the workman had told him that he has to provide the school bus and it is not of his house . If he will not provide the same , he will have to bear the consequences . This clearly shows that the Colliery Manager , Shri N. S. Sabrawal has made development in the alleged language used by the workman during the course of his evidence in the Tribunal . Moreover it is already discussed earlier that the real complaint filed before the management on 2-10-87 is also not brought on the record to corroborate the evidence of the said Manager . The evidence of the Manager Shri Sabrawal regarding the text of language used to abuse him is also not pleaded in the Written Statement . M.W.I Shri Kunchi and MW.2 Satya Narain have not supported in their evidence that the workman Shri Gupta had abused the Manager as has been alleged by the management M.W.3 Shri Shyam Narayan Singh has stated completely different abusive words in his evidence which is not alleged bythe management. M. W -4 Shri Virendra Kumar Sharma is working as Personnel Manager in Rajgamar colliery . He is not an eye witness and has deposed on the basis of record. He has also not stated the exact words used to insult to the Mines Manager , Shri Sabrawal . Thus the evidence adduced by the management does prove that the workman Shri Mahesh Kumar Gupta had abused and threatened the manager on denial to provide the vehicle .

9. The learned counsel for the Union/ workman submitted that even if it is presumed that the indiscreet language was used by the workman such indiscreet language cannot be the basis of order of dismissal . The learned counsel for the workman has placed reliance on a decision reported in 2002-1 - LLJ Page 213 , Raju & others

11. Another important factual aspect, as has been alleged by the management , is that the workman , Shri Gupta went twice at the residence ofthe Mines Manager alongwith others in odd hours in the midnight for demanding bus to visit sister collieries on the eve of Puja and committed criminal house tress pass . There after shouted there , knocked the door , continuously rang the bell and brick batted on the door and window . It is an admitted fact that the workman , Shri Gupta alongwith others went to the residence of the Mines Manager in odd hours for school bus to visit sister collieries by the workers . Now let us examine the evidence adduced by the management . On the 1390

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/ PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ] basisof allegation , it is clear that admittedly there was no assault, nor in evidence of the main complainant Shri Sabrawal (M. W.5) that there was an attempt to assault.

written FIR of Shri Sabrawal appears to be written on 2-10-87 which is Exhibit M/ 15 but there is nothing to indicate thatit was lodged before the police on the same day. The challan (Exhibit M / 13 ) gives different picture . The challan shows that it was lodged before the police on 15-11-87 at 22.30 hours . It shows that it was lodged after one and half months. This criminal case ended in acquittal . Shri Sabrawal has given no explanation as to why he had not lodged the FIR on 2-10-87 as has been alleged . This fact also looks probable that the story of the occurrence is not reliable .

14. The management has examined other witnesses as well . MW- 4 Virendra Kumar Sharma is not an eye witness . He was not witness ofthe enquiry or in the criminal case . M.W.I Sukhlal is line mazdoor . He is not chowkidar or guard of the bunglow . He is said to be residing at the back of the bunglow and appears to do work of the complainant . He appears to be interested witness . His evidence deposed before the criminal court contradicts his evidence adduced in this case . The manner of occurrence appears to have been changed in both the evidence. M. W.2 Satyanarain has stated in his evidence that he does not knowthe occurrence ofdated 1-10-87 . M. W. -3 Shyam Narain Singh has refused to answer the questions in cross- examination . The verocity of the evidence of this witness isnot tested . His evidence is not reliable . Thus the evidence ofthemanagement , as has been discussed, is not sufficient to prove misconduct of the workman Shri Mahesh Kumar Gupta.

12. M.W.5 Shri Sabrawal has stated in his evidence that Shri Gupta asked him on telephone for the school bus to the sister collieries to witness Durga Puja . This fact is also not denied . He has further stated that he expressed his inabilitiy to provide the vehicle at odd hours and after about 10 minutes he alongwith some persons came at his residence . That time his guard was putting a lock in the main gate . He has not disclosed the name of the guard . He has stated that Shri Gupta forcibly entered into his bunglow and came to his bed room . He was on the bed and was about to sleep . He questioned from Shri Gupta and expressed his inability to provide them vehicle in odd hours . They started shouting and used filthy language . He apprehended assault and therefore tried to escape by saying to collect the key of the Bus from Goomti but they forced him to ring to Goomti for key. He did the same knowing fully well that the key was not with the guard . Soon after they came and Shri Mahesh Kumar Gupta and Shri Parveen Gupta scaled over the locked gate and knocked the door , and continuously rang the bell . On no response , brick batted on the door . He opened the door and expressed his inability to provide the bus and asked them to go but they abused and threatened for dire consequence . This story appears to be not probable because at the first instance, he apprehended assault and as such to escape from them, he sent them to collect the key from the Goomti knowing it fully well that the key was not there . At the second occasion , he had no apprehension of assault which it is alleged that they were in riotous mood at the door and came outside the bunglow without seeking help of the police or any other person . Secondly this story is also not acceptable because he has stated in his evidence that he made complaint to the General Manager which is at Page No.1 of the departmental enquiry papers . In the departmental enquiry , he has stated that he made complaint to the General Manager on 2-10-87 which is to be used for contradiction . The complaint of Shri Sabrawal at Page - 1 of the departmental proceeding shows that it was of 4-10-87 . This clearly shows that the real complaint is neither placed before the departmental proceeding nor in this case . The basis of the complaint appears to be not established as such the above story is not probable and reliable.

15. On the other hand , the Union/ workman has also adduced evidence in the case . WW.I Parveen Kumar Gupta has not stated on the point of occurrence . WW- 2 Siddha Nath Tripathi has come to say that the workman Shri Gupta is a Trade Union leader and during the period of Puja, the bus was being provided . He has stated that the workman had phoned to Shri Sabrawal on the alleged date and thereafter he told him that within 10-15 minutes the bus is reaching . When the bus did not reach , they went to the residence of Sabrawal . The guard told them that Shri Sabrawal was sleeping , then they returned back . This shows that no occurrence in the manner as has been alleged, was taken place on the alleged- date. W.W.- 3 Prasanna Kumar Sharma has stated that the workman is a Trade Union Leader . He is not witness of occurrence . WW-4 Mohd . Salim Siddiqui . He has stated that on the alleged date, the bus was to be provided for visiting sister colliery on the eve of Durga Puja and the workman had talked with the manager Shri Sabrawal but when the bus did not reach there , Ajay Gupta went at the residence of Mr.Sabrawal . The workman Mr. Mahesh Kumar Gupta did not go to the residence of Sabrawal : There is nothing in his evidence that the occurrence took place in the manner as has been alleged by the management. WW - 5 Ram Swarup Sahu has stated that colliery bus was being provided to the colliery workers for visiting Puja places . The applicant/workman was office bearer - of BKMS in the year 1987. On the alleged 13. One another aspect is also clear that the management witness Shri Sabrawal has also stated in his evidence that he had lodged FIR regarding the alleged occurrence before the police who submitted challan before the Magistrate, Manendragarh . The said copy of challan is marked as Exhibit M/13 . He has also stated that he had also given evidence before the Enquiry Officer . The enquiry proceeding shows that he had been examined on 27-11-87 and 28-11-87. On 27-11-87 he had made complaint to the General Manager on 2-10-87 and written FIR to police . The [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

date, the workman came at his residence at about 11.30 PM in the night. He has not stated about occurrence . WW- 6 Ajay Kumar Gupta is not cross examined and as such his evidence is not to be looked into . WW- 7 is the workman , Mr. Mahesh Kumar Gupta has stated in his evidence that he was office bearer of the Union and before 1987 , the bus was provided to visit sister collieries on the occasion of Durga Puja and for providing bus , it was talked with the thenManager Mr. Sabrawal about 3 to 4 days ago and he had permitted to provide bus . He was also Vice Chair of Puja Committee. He has stated that on the alleged date , he telephoned to the Manager for bus who told him that the driver is not available and make arrangement for driver . After arrangement of driver , he went at the residence ofthe Manager but he refused to provide the same . He told him in a behaved manner that if it was not to be provided , it must be told earlier . Thereafter he returned back . Thus the evidence of the Union/ workman clearly shows that no occurrence took place in the manner as has been alleged by the management .

16. The evidence of the workman clearly shows that the bus was being provided every year during Durga Puja to visit sister collieries to the workers . The management witness , Mr. Sabrawal has admitted in his evidence that the company's bus occasionally provided to the workers on exigencies and Area Manager is competent to provide the bus. He has further stated that Area Manager was on leave and he was incharge on his place. Durga Puja was celebrated till odd hours . It looks probable that the demand of the Bus by Union leader to visit the sister collieries on the eve of Puja had made annoyance to him as the applicant/ workman rang at odd hours resulting in making complaint before authority on 2-10-1987 but such complaint did not disclose any misconduct . Hence it was suppressed by the management.

17. The learned counsel for the workman submitted that in the instant case , it is alleged by the management that the workman Mr. Mahesh Kumar Gupta and Mr. Parveen Gupta committed criminal house tresspass in riotous mood throwing brickbatts and entered into the room abused him but no chargesheet was issued against Mr. Parveen Gupta . Though the allegation was same against Mr. Parveen Gupta. He was singling out to proceed departmentally and passed the disproportionate punishment of dismissal . The learned counsel has relied a decision reported in ( 2001 ) 10 S.C.C.530 Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co.Ltd . versus Jitendra Prasad Singh and Others wherein the Hon'ble Court has held that- "On an enquiry being held , the enquiry authority found that the allegation of misconduct is proved and the disciplinary authority on consideration of the report of the enquiry authority and the other relevant material dismissed the first respondent from service . Thereafter , a reference to the Labour Court at the instance of the first respondent was made .

688 G10 18

1391 The Labour Court though held on a preliminary question that the disciplinary enquiry conducted against the first respondent is valid came to the conclusion after perusing the documentary and oral evidence on record that the dismissal was not justified and held that he was entitled to reinstatement with full back wages with continuity in service and other consequential benefits . A writ petition was filed in the High Court which was allowed but on the basis of certain offer made , the learned Single Judge also directed that the appellant shall pay to the first respondent salary from the date of dischasge till the date of the order in a lumpsum of Rs.50,000/ -. Thereupon both the management and theworkman filed two appeals , in the appeals , several questions were raised as to whether the act attributed to the first respondent would amount to misconduct at all which will entail a disciplinary enquiry at the instance of the management to end up with his dismissal ; strong reliance was placed on Glaxo Laboratories ( 1 ) Ltd. v . Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Meerut . Ultimately, however , the two learned judges were agreed on one aspect of the matter that the question , whether on misconduct attributed to the workman there should have been casual connection between misconduct and employment of the workman may not be of much significance when such acts have taken place within the premises of the factory , should be decided in an appropriate case. What influenced the Court in deciding the matter is that:

'Since as many as three workmen on almost identical charges were found guilty of misconduct in connection with the same incident, though in separate proceedings , and one was punished with only one month's suspension , and the other was ultimately reinstated in view of the findings recorded by the Labour Court and affirmed by the High Court and the Supreme Court , it would be denial of justice to the appellant if he alone is singled out for punishment by way of dismissal from service' .

Asthe judgement is rested upon this position , what ever other views may have been expressed in the course of the judgement maybe of no significance. In that view of the matter, we think there is no need to interfere with the order made by the High Court , that too in a proceeding arising under Article 136 of the Constitution . Hence we decline to interfere with the order made by the High Court . The appeals are dismissed accordingly . "

Thus it is clear that even if it is said that the workman had committed misconduct , it is unjustified that the one of the [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ) 1392

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6, 2010/ PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

worker is dismissed from service and another is even not prosecuted.

(workman) was acquitted on the basis of benefit ofdoubt . I agree with the view of the learned counsel for the management that it was not a clean acquittal and the ruling cited by him is applicable in the case .

21. The learned counsel for the management has also cited the following rulings.

1. 2005 ( 1 ) LLJ 1135 , Employer , Management collicry, Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. versus Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union .

18. Another point raised by the learned counsel for the workman that in this case criminal proceeding and departmental proceeding are based on identical and similar set of facts and in the criminal proceeding the workman was acquitted on 16-2-93 . As such it is unjust to punish in the departmental proceeding . The learned counsel has relied on a decision reported in (2006 )5 S.C.C. 446 G.M.Tank versus State of Gujrat and others wherein the Hon'ble Court has held that

2. 2005 ( 3 ) SCC 401 M.P. Electricity Board versus Jagdish Chandra Sharma .

3. 1997 ( 1 ) LLJ 1212 New Shorrock Mills versus Maheshbhai T. Rao .

4. 2004 ( 11 ) LLJ 429 , Rajmani Sharma Versus P. O. CGIT, Jabalpur and others .

In our opinion, such facts and evidence in the departmental as well as criminal proceedings were the same without there being any iota of difference, the appellant should succeed . The distinction which is usually proved between the departunental and criminal proceedings on the basis of the approach and burden of proof would not be applicable in the instant case. Though the finding recorded in the domestic enquiry was found to be valid by the courts below, when there was an honourable acquittal of the employee during the pendency of the proceedings challenging the dismissal , the same requires to be taken note of and the decision in Paul Anthony case wili apply. We therefore , hold that the appeal filed by the appeliant deserves to be allowed .

The above rulings are not applicable in the instant case where it is established that the management has not proved the misconduct against the workman , Mr. Mahesh Kumar Gupta inCourt and the departmental proceeding conducted bythe EnquiryOfficer was held illegal . It is also established that the workman Mr.Mahesh Kumar Gupta was singled out and punished whereas the charges were also against Mr.Parveen Gupta and he was not even prosecuted. Accordingly the issue is decided in favour of the workman.

The learned coun el for the workman also relied,ahit order dated 18-1-2007 passed in W.P.No.4051.2000 Kamdesh Kumar Tripathi versus Union of India and others . The judgement of G.M.Tank ( Supra) is relied.

22. On the basis of the discussion made above , it is apparent that the action ofthe management of West Chirimiri Area of SECL in dismissing his workman Shri Mahesh KumarGupta, Tub - writer, vide letter No. WC/ 78 / 7 / 88 dated 18-1-1988 is illegal and unjustified. The dismissal order dated 18-1-1988 is , hereby , set aside . The management is directed to reinstate the workman , Shri Mahesh Kumar Gupta from the date ofdismissal and to pay the full back wages from the date of re - instatement. Accordingly the reference is answered.

19. The learned counsel for the management submitted that there was not a clean acquittal of the workman in the criminal case as such the above cited rulings are not applicable in the instance case . The learned counsel for the management has relied upon a decision reported in 2009-1 - LJ - 220 ( SC) West Bokaro Colliery ( TISCO Ltd. ) Versus Ram Parvesh Singh where the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that:

23. In the result , award is passed without any costs . 24. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India. Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules .

MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 12 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 695. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सी. पी. डब्ल्यू. डी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं.1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 78/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-02-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Tribunal has set aside the report of the Enquiry Officer and the order of dismissal passed by the Punishing Authority by observing that the charges against the respondent were not proved beyond reasonable doubt. It has repeatedly been held by this Court that the acquittal in a criminal case would not operate as a bar for drawing up of a disciplinary proceeding against a delinquent . It is well settled principle of law that yardstick and standard of proof in a criminal case is different from the one in disciplinary proceedings . While the standard of proof in a criminal case is proof beyond all reasonable doubt, the standard of proof in a departmental proceeding is preponderance of probabilities .

20. On persal of the judgment passed in criminal case on 16-2-93 ( Exhibit M/ 14 ), it is clear that the accused

[सं. एल-42012/32/2006 -आईआर ( डीयू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

1393 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6 , 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

NewDelhi , the 12th February , 2010

S.O. 695. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 78/2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of C.P.W.D. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 12-02-2010 .

[No. L -42012/32/2006 - IR (DU ) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1 , KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX, DELHI

1. D. No. 78/06

Tara Chand , Khalasi Through All India CPWD (MRM) Karamchari Sangathan , House No.4823 . Gali No.13 , Balbir Nagar Extension . Shahdara , New Delhi - 110032

.Workman

Vs.

1. The Superintending Engineer , Coordination Circle, (Elect .). CPWD, R. K. Puram, New Delhi .

2. The Executive Engineer, ECD- V , CPWD , Pushpa Bhawan , NewDelhi

.Management

AWARD

2. Claim statement was filed on behalf of Shri Tara Chand by All India Central PWD ( MRM ) Karamchari Sangathan ( Regd . ) ( hereinafter referred to as the claimant union), pleading that Tara Chand was employed as a muster roll karamchari on 12-8-83 under Executive Engineer , Electrical Construction Division ( V) CPWD , New Delhi . He had put in 240 days of continuous service in each calendar year from the date of his employment till the date of regularization of his services . His services were regularized onthatpost on 22-3-93 . The Apex Court in Surender Singh's case had held that services of all daily rated workmen should be regularized from the date of their initial employment, in case they have put in six months of continuous service . In pursuance ofthe said judgment , Government of India took a decision to regularize services of all daily rated workmen by 7-11-88 . The Director General ( Works ) , CPWD had also issued order dated 25-8-88 to that effect . There are three wings under CPWD viz . Civil , Electrical and Horticultural , where several daily rated workmen are employed. Horticulture Wing of the management had regularized services of their daily rated workmen on 7-12-88 , while the Electrical and Civil Wings of the management have not taken any action in that regard . Employment of muster roll employees for years together is an unfair labour practice . Tara Chand is covered under the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act , 1972 , ( in short the Act ) . Orders dated 26-7-06 have been issued for payment of gratuity to all muster roll /daily rated employees . Ram Khilari , a daily rated workman , have been regularized in pursuance of an award passed by the Industrial Tribunal . The claimant is similarly situated as Ram Khilari and is entitled for regularization of his services from the date of his initial employment . Pension Rules contemplates that a workman who is getting monthly wages under proper scale of pay , is eligible for pensionary benefits . The workman approached through the claimant union for regularization of his services , but to not avail . It has been claimed that services of Tara Chand may be regularized from the date of his initial appointment.

A muster roll khalasi was employed by the Executive Engineer , Electrical Construction Division No.V of the CPWD , on 12-8-1983 . His services were regularized on 22-3-93 . However he claimed regularization of his services from the date of his initial appointment , in pursuance of order passed by the Apex Court in Surender Singh's case (1986 ( 1 ) SCC 632) . When his requested was not conceded to, he raised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer. Since conciliation proceedings failed , appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , vide order No. L - 42012 / 32 / 2006 - IR ( DU ) , New Delhi , dated 9-10-06 , with the following terms :-

"Whether the action of the All India CPWD(MRM) Karamchari Sangathan for regularization of service ofTara Chand as the Safai Karamchari w.e.f. 12-8-83 is legal andjustified? Ifyes to what reliefthe workman is entitled to and from which date ? "

3. Contest was given to the claim pleading that the Apex Court never directed the management to regularize services of daily rated muster roll employees from the date of their initial appointment . However, the Court emphasized on the Government to take steps for regularization of the service of muster roll employees . Therefore , 8982 posts were created in September , 1992 for regularization of eligible workers , engaged prior to 19-11- 85. All workmen were regularized from prospective dates and not from the dates of their initial appointments . The claimant was too junior to be regularized against those posts. Whenever a vacant post was available and his name fell in seniority for regularization , his services were regularized w.e.f. 22-3-93 . It has been pleaded that claim of the workman for regularization of his service from the date ofhis initial appointment is uncalled for .

[PART 11 SEC. 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 /PHALGUNA 15, 1931

1394

4. Shri Satish Kumar Sharma , authorized representative made a statement that no evidence is required in the case . He presents that the case may be adjudicated on the basis of admitted facts . Shri S.P.Gupta, Executive Engineer , also clarified that the management does not want to adduce evidence in the matter . Consequently evidence of the parties were closed .

projected by various Chief Engineers and Divisional Heads, 12440 muster roll employees were to be regularized. Department of Personnel and Training had instructed to regularize service of such persons by 7th of December.88... All Divisional Heads were instructed to check records of muster roll employees , who were to be regularized . They were further advised to administer trade test and prepare records in respect of posts for which regular vacancies were to be created . In pursuance of the guidelines so laid, 8982 posts were created by the Government of India in September , 92 for regularization of muster roll employees , in compliance of missives given by the Apex Court in Surinder Singh's case (supra).

5. Arguments were heard at the bar . Shri S. K. Sharma, authorized representative , raised submissions on behalf of the workman . Shri S. A. Khan ; authorized representative , raised submissions on behalf of the management. I have given my careful consideration to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record. My findings on the issues involved in the controversy are as follows:

8. It is not the case of the workman that his seniority made him eligible for regularization, when 8982 posts were created by the Government of India . Though seniority list dated 30-12-03 has been placed on record, yet workman could not project that he was senior enough to be regularized against the posts created by the Government of India in September, 92. It is apparent that the workman could not show that he was senior enough and his seniority made him eligible for regularization of the job against the posts created by the Government of India, in pursuance of the directive given by the Apex Court in Surender Singh's case ( supra) . Consequently , it is evident that the workman has not been able to project that there was a vacancy prior to 22-3-93 for regularization of his services as Khalasi . When there was no vacancy prior to 22-3-93 claim of the workman for regularization of his services had not matured. Therefore, it does not lie in the mouth of the workman to present that his services ought to have been regularized on completion of two years of continuous services , in pursuance ofthe circular .

6. As emerge out of the facts pleaded by the parties , Tara Chand joined services of the management as a muster roll khalasi on 12-8-83 under Executive Engineer , Electrical Construction Division No.5 of C.P.W.D. He projects a claim that his services were to be regularized after completion of two years continuous service . He has placed reliance on an order dated 25-8-88 issued by the office of Director General (Works) , CPWD . Perusal of the said order makes it clearthat an exercise was undertaken by CPWD authorities to regularize all muster roll employees , who had put in six months continuous services in pursuance of missives given byApex Court in Surinder Singh's case . All superintending Engineers ( Coordination ) , Superintending Engineer Civil and Electrical were called upon to examine the service record ofall eligible muster roll employees . They were required to finalise trade test etc. which were to be taken by muster roll employees for purpose of regularisation . Seniority list dated 30-12-03 was also relied by the workman . Perusal of the aforesaid circular makes it clear that Director General (Works) has commanded all Divisional heads to take steps for regularization of the services of muster roll workers , who have rendered 240 days service each in two consecutive years in a higher category , even if they have worked in a lower category for sometime , subject to the condition that service rendered in lower category would not be considered for the purpose of seniority or for any other purpose and further subject to the condition that an option should be taken from the concerned muster roll worker at the time of his absorption in the lower / higher category of work charge establishment and such all those who opt for absorption in the lower category may be allowed to do so . The aforesaid circular makes it clear that regularization of such a worker is subject to availability of a vacant post .

9. Circular No. 29 / 77/ 2000 - ECX , New Delhi , dated 26-6-2006 was issued by the Director General ( Works), CPWD, in respect of payment of gratuity to its casual hand receipt and muster roll workers under the Act . The said circular makes it clear that the matter was examined in consultation with the Ministry of Urban Development and Ministry of Labour and it was clarified that the Act is applicable to casual , muster roll , hand receipt and daily rated workers of the CPWD . Consequently ali A.D.Vs , CS , SCS , S.C. Coordination , Executive Engineer , Directorate of Horticulture , Additional Directorate of Horticulture , Deputy Director of Horticulture , All Deputy Welfare Labour Commissioners and Assistant Labour Welfare Commissioners were requested to make payment of gratuity to casual muster roll , hand receipt and daily rated workers of CPWD as admissible under the Act . It was further mentioned therein that the current/pending court cases on the similar issue may be defended or got settled accordingly. Therefore, it is evident that the management admits the claim of all casual muster roll , hand receipt or daily rated workers of the CPWD for payment of gratuity under the Act .

7. Government of India had laid guidelines for regularization of muster roll employees . As per guidelines laid, the work which cannot be entrusted to regular employees , for those situations posts are to be created with the concurrence of Finance Ministry . As per facts [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

1395

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

10. Whether service rendered by the workman , which was paid from contingency , can be counted towards pension? For an answer , provisions of CCS Pension Rules , 1972 ( in short the Rules) are to be considered . Rule 14 of the said Rules makes provision in that regard . It emerge out of the provisions of Rule 14 that periods of service paid from contingencies do not count as qualifying service for pension . However Goverment of India took a decision in May , 1968 and an office memorandum was issued on 14-5-1968 , wherein it is detailed that in some cases , employees paid from contingencies , employed in types of work requiring services of whole - time workers and are paid on monthly rates of pay or daily rates computed and paid on monthly basis and on being found fit brought on to regular establishment . The question whether in such cases service paid from contingencies should be allowed to count for pension and if so to what extent has been considered in the National Council and in pursuance of the recommendation of the Council , it has been decided that half of the service paid from contingencies will be allowed to count toward pension at the time of absorption in regular employment subject to the following conditions , viz.- (a) Service paid from contingencies should have been, in ajob involving whole -time employment (and not part -time for a portion of the day ) .

(b) Service paid from contingencies should be in a type of work or job for which regular posts could have been sanctioned , e.g. , malis , chowkidars , khalasis , etc.

(c) The service should have been one for which the payment is made either on monthly or daily rates computed and paid on a monthly basis and which though not analogous to the regular scale of pay should bear some relation in the matter of pay to those being paid for similar jobs being performed by staffs in regular establishments .

(d) The service paid from contingencies should have been continuous and followedby absorption in regular employment without a break.

(c) Subject to the above conditions being fulfilled, the weightage for past service paid from contingencies will be limited to the period after Ist January , 1961 for which authentic records of service may be available Reference can be made to office memorandum No. G.I. , M.F. O.M. No. 12 ( 1 ) -EV 68 , dated 14th May, 1968 .

11. Here in this case it is not a matter of dispute that the workman , who was paid from contingencies, was performing whole time job with the management since 12-8-83 . His services were regularized on 23-6-93 . Не performed functions analogous to regular employees till the date of his regularization . His services with the 688 GI/10 19

management were continuous without any break . He satisfied all the conditions laid down in the aforesaid office memorandum issued by the Govt . of India . Hence , the management is under an obligation to comply the said office memorandum and count service of the workman for the purpose of pension .

12. In view of the foregoing reasons , it stands established that the workman failed to show a case for regularization of his services from the date of initial employment . Hence demand of the claimant Union for regularization of services of Tara Chand as Safai Karamchari w.e.f. 12-8-83 is neither legal nor justified . Hence demand of the claimant union is to be discarded. However the management is under an obligation to comply the aforesaid circular and the Rules . Resultantly it is expedient to command the management to record services rendered by Tara Chand as muster roll employee in his service book , which services would be taken into account for payment ofgratuity under the Act , at the time ofhis superannuation or death , as the contingency may arise as well as for calculation of qualifying service for pension under the Pension Rules 1972. An award is accordingly passed. It may be sent to the appropriate Government for publication. Dated: 1-12-2009.

DR. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 12 फरवरी , 2010

का.आ. 696. कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का34) की धारा -1 की उपधारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 01 मार्च 2010 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा -76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा-77 , 78 , 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले की प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबंध आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:

" आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य के मेढक जिले के रामचन्द्रापुरम मण्डल के रामचन्द्रापुरम राजस्व गाँव में स्थित भारत हेवी इलेक्टिकल्स लिमिटेड ( बी एच ई एल ) के अधिकार क्षेत्र के अंतर्गत आने वाले सभी क्षेत्र । "

[सं. एस-38013/10/2010 - एस.एस. 1 ] एस. डी. जेवियर , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 12th February. 2010

S.O. 696. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 3 ) of Section I of the Employees State Insurance Act , 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st March , 2010 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Sections 44 and 45 which have already been brought into force ) and Chapter V and VI [ except sub - section ( i) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into 1396

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/ PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[PART 11- SEC . 3 (ii )] force] ofthe said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Andhra Pradesh namely

"All the areas falling under thejurisdiction of Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL) in the Revenue village of Ramachandrapuram in Ramachandrapuram Mandal ofMedek district of Andhra Pradesh state . "

[No. S- 38013 /10 /2010 - SS. I ]

S. D. XAVIER , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 15 फरवरी , 2010

employees are governed by Regional Rural Banks (appointment and promotion of officers and other employees) Rules 1998 ( hereinafter referred as the Rules) . DeenBandhu Tiwari was engaged as casual employee by branch manager of Sharif Nagar , Thakurwara , ( Moradabad) branch of the bank , in violation of the Rules . His services were taken w.e.f. 6th of August . 98 till 14th ofAugust , 1999. Initially he was paid @ Rs.12 per day till 22nd ofAugust, 98. Thereafter he was paid @ , Rs . 15 per day till 7th of August , 99 , for the actual days of his work. When his services were disengaged Shri Tiwari voluntarily refunded a sum of Rs . 827 to the branch manager , who deposited thatamount with the bank . Deen Bandhu Tiwari raised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer , claiming that his services were illegal dispensed with on 19th August, 99. Since conciliation proceedings failed, the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication, vide order No. L - 12012/ 303 /2003-1R( D - 1 ) , New Delhi dated 8-4-2004, with the following terms : - का.आ. 697. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार प्राथामा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. - 1 , दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 23/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-02-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/303/2003 - आईआर( बी-1 ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

"Whether the action of the Chairman , Prathama Bank, Moradabad, in terminating services of Deen Bandhu Tiwari , sub staff w.e.f. 19th of August , 98 isjust , fair and legal ? If not for what relief the workman is entitled to?"

NewDelhi , the 15th February, 2010

S.O. 697. In pursuance of Section 17 of the industrial Dispute Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 23/2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Prathama Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 15-02-2010 .

[No. L - 12012/303 /2003 - IR( B - 1 ) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL No. 1, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI

I.D.NO. 23/2004

Shri Deen Bandhu Tiwari

2. Claim statement was filed by Shri Tiwari pleading therein that he was appointed as sub staff in Sharif Nagar, Thakurdwara , ( Moradabad) branch of Prathama Bank on 6-8-98 . He was paid @ Rs . 12 per day upto 22th of August , 98. Thereafter he was paid @ Rs . 15 per day . No appointment letter was issued to him . He was also not permitted to mark his attendance in the attendance register . When he demanded letter of appointment , he was made to keep quite by the branch manager saying that he would be thrown out of job. Having no alternative, he went on serving the bank . The branch manager felt annoyed with his demand of permanent absorption in service and orally dispensed with his services w.e.f. 19-8-99 , besides recovery of Rs . 827 from him in an arbitrary manner . His services were dispensed with without any notice or pay in lieu thereof. Retrenchment compensation was also not paid to him . When he requested for reinstatement of his services , the branch manager told him to wait for sometime . Since nothing was done in his favour , he raised a dispute before the Conciliation Officer , Moradabad . He claims reinstatement in service with continuity and back wages .

S/ o Shri Om Prakash Sharma , R/ o Village & Post Office Sharif Nagar, Thakurdwara ,

Workman

Moradabad( UP )

Versus

The Chairinan .

Prathama Bank,

HeadOffice,

Moradabad, U.P.

Management

AWARD

Prathama išank , sponsored by the Syndicate Bank. was established under Regional Rural Banks Act . 1976. Its

3. Contest was given to his claim by the bank pleading that services of Shri Tiwari were engaged by the branch manager, Sharif Nagar , Thakurdwara ( Moradabad ) branch ofthe bank, in violation of the Rules , on 6th of August , 98 . Hisservices were taken as part time messenger cum sweeper . He used to work for 2-1 / 2 hours per day . He was paid@ Rs. 12 per day upto 22-8-98 . Thereafter he was paid @Rs.15 per day till 7-8-99 . Since he was paid in excess by the branch manager against the prescribed rate of Rs . 12 per day, while leaving his services on 14-8-99 , 1397 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

DeenBandhu Tiwari voluntarily refunded a sum of Rs . 827 to the branch manager , who deposited that amount in the bank. Since action of the branch manager in engaging Deen Bandhu Tiwari was in violation of the Rules , disciplinary action was initiated against him . Besides punishment awarded to him. the branch manager was ordered to deposit a sum of Rs.3664/- , illegally paid to Deen Bandhu Tiwari , besides an amount of Rs . 1125/-as interest . He deposited a sum of Rs.4789/-with the branch on 25-9-2004 .

staff for indefinite period in Sharif Nagar, Thakurdwara (Moradabad) branch of the bank on 6-8-98 . He was paid @Rs.12/ - per day upto 22-8-98 and thereafter Re. 15 /- per day. He was engaged for whole time dutics as a sub staff. No appointment letter was issued to him deliberately. Hewas not permitted to mark his attendance in attendance register with oblique motive . When he requested for his absorption , his services were terminated on 19-8-99. During the course of his cross examination , he concedes that his name was not sponsored by employment exchange for appointment . He came to know through Shri Mohd. Gufran, branch manager , that a post of peon cum messenger was lying vacant . He requested the branch manager , who appointed him against that post on 6-8-98 . He feigned ignorance that branch manager was proceeded departmentally for illegally appointing him the post .

4. The bank presents that the branch manager was competent to engage a casual messenger for a period of 15 days only , when regular messenger happens to be on leave . Deen Bandhu Tiwari was engaged by the branch manager without regular messenger being on leave . Since services of Shri Tiwari were engaged in violation ofthe circular dated 25-7-92 and the Rules , the branch manager has no option but to disengage him . Shri Tiwari was well aware about his illegal . unauthorized and incompetent engagement by the branch manager . Since Shri Tiwari was never in the service of the bank. recruited in terms of the Rules, his services were not at all required by the bank . Since engagement of Shri Tiwari was illegal , no right accrued in his favour . It has been pleaded that his claim statement is liable to be dismissed .

5. On pleadings of the parties , following issues were settled by my learned predecessor :

1. Whether there exist relationship of employer and employee between the parties ?

2. Whether the workman is entitled to the relief claimed?

3. Whether engagement of the workman by the bank was in the knowledge of the Chairman ? If so its effect.

4. As in terms of reference.

9. Shri A. K. Singh swears that in exercise ofpowers contained in Section 29 of the Regional Rural Bank Act, 1976 , the Central Government in consultation with national bank and the sponsor bank made the Rules which were published vide notification dated 29th of May. 98. As per Rule 5 , the board , in consultation with the sponsor bank , could determine the number of vacancies in each category ofpost to be filled in the bank . As per Rule 6 , all vacancies were to be filled by promotion or direct recruitment. As per Rule 7 , the Chairman of the bank was the appointing authority in respect of all posts . Recruitment to the post of messenger , messenger cum sweeper , driver cum messenger and security guard was to be made by the selection committee of the bank , after making a reference to the employment exchange , sainik board or other agencies , catering the welfare of reserved categories . As per sub rule (2) of Rule 10 no candidate , other than sponsored by employment exchanges , sainik board or other agency, was to be called for interview . Selection was to be made on the basis of the interview by the committee, consisting of Chairman ofthe bank , two senior most officer of the bank and a director nominated by the national bank , from amongst the candidates , sponsored by the employment exchange , sainik board or other agencies , referred above .

6. Shri Deen Bandhu Tiwari tendered his affidavit as evidence to substantiate his claim . He was cross examined on behalf of the management . Sri A. K. Singh, Senior Manager , tendered his affidavit as evidence on behalf of the management . He was also cross examined at length on behalf of the workman . No other witness was examined by either of the parties .

7. Arguments wee heard at the bar . Shri Nem Singh , authorized representative , advanced arguments on behalf ofthe workman . Shri S.P.Singh , authorized representative, raised his submissions on behalf of the management . I have given my careful considerations to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record . My findings on issues involved in the controversy are as follows:

Issue No. I

10. Shri Singh unfolds that neither any vacancy was notified nor reference was made to employment exchange , sainik board or other agency for filling up post of messenger or messenger cum sweeper . No application was submitted by Deen Bandhu Tiwari nor his name was sponsored by the employment exchange . Shri Tiwari did not appear for any interview before the selection committee . No appointment letter was issued to Sh . Tiwari . He was never engaged against any vacancy by the bank . There was no vacancy for the post of messenger or messenger cum sweeper in Sharif Nagar branch of the bank . Name of Shri Tiwari never appeared on the rolls of the bank .

8. Shri Deen Bandhu Tiwari swears in his affidavit that he was appointed against a permanent post of sub

11. Shri Singh highlights that Shri Tiwari was engaged by the branch manager , Sharif Nagar , Thakurwara 1398

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010 / PHALGUNA 15 , 1931

[PART 11 SEC . 3 ( ii ) |

industry carried on by or under the authority of any department of the Central Government or a State Government , the authority prescribed in that behalf or where no such authority is prescribed, the Head ofthe Department . The definition of employer is , therefore , intended only to operate in relation to an activity properly describable as an industry'

(Moradabad) branch of the bank on 6-8-98 as part time messenger - cum- sweeper for 2-1 / 2 hours , without any approval from the head office . He was paid @ Rs . 12 per dayupto 22-8-98 . Thereafter he was paid @ Rs . 15 per day till 7-8-99 for the actual days , for which he worked. No salary or other amount was paid to Shri Tiwari from salary account . Since he was paid in excess , he voluntarily refunded Rs . 827 on 19-8-99 and the branch manager deposited that money in the bank . Since Shri Tiwari was illegally engaged , disciplinary action was initiated against the branch manager . Besides punishment awarded , a sum ofRs. 3864 was recovered from branch manager alongwith the interest amounting to Rs.1125 . Appointment of Shri Tiwari was contrary to circular dated 25-7-92 , which provides that when regular messenger happens to be on leave, the branch manager may engage a part time worker on daily wage for a maximum period of 15 days . In the instant case , one messenger was already working in Sharif Nagar branch of the bank and there was no question of engaging another messenger , in pursuance of circular dated 25-7-92. During the course of his cross examination he presents that part time messenger is not supposed to work for whole day . He works for two hours only . No bipartite settlement is applicable to the bank . No employee can be recruited in violation of the Rules .

14. As testified by Shri Singh , the bank has been established under Section 3 of the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976 on the request of the sponsor bank, by way of Gazette notification in that regard . Sub- section ( 2 ) of Section 3 of the aforesaid Act makes it clear that every Regional Rural Bank shall be a body corporate with perpetual succession and common seal with power to acquire , hold and dispose of property and to contract and may sue and be sued in its name . Section 8 of the said Act unfolds that general superintendence , direction and management of the business of a Regional Rural Bank shall vest in a board of directors who may exercise all powers and discharge all functions which may be exercised or discharged by the Regionaal Bank . Section 9 of that Act enacts that the Board of Dire tors shall consist of the Chairman , appointed under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 11 , and ( a) two directors to be minated by the Central Government , (b) one director , who is an officer of the Reserve Bank , to be nominated by that bank , ( c ) one director , who is an officer of the National Bank , to be nominated by that bank , ( d ) two directors , who are officers of the sponsored bank, to be nominated by that bank , and (e) two directors , who are officers of the concerned State Government, to be nominated by that Government .

12. According to the testimony of Shri Singh , Shri Tiwari was engaged by the branch manager . These facts are not dispelled by the claimant . Hence question for consideration comes as to whether branch manager , Sharif Nagar , Thakurdwara , ( Moradabad) branch of the bank occupies the status of an employer , who employed Shri Tiwari . For an answer to this proposition the Tribunal issupposed to look at the definition of the employer , given in clause (g ) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( in short the Act ) . For the sake of convenience the said definition is extracted thus:

'Employer ' means

15. Therefore, it is emerging over the record that Prathama Bank is a body corporate with perpetual succession , can acquire , hold and dispose of property and contract and may sue or be sued in its name . Affairs ofthe Prathama Bank are to be exercised by the Board of Directors consisting of the Chairman and eight other directors nominated by the Central Government . the Reserve Bank , the National Bank , the sponsor bank and the State Government .

(i) in relation to an industry carried on by or under the authority of any department of the Central Government or a State Government , the authority prescribed in this behalf, or where no authority is prescribed, the Head of the Department.

(ii) in relation to an industry carried on by or on behalf of a local authority the Chief Executive of that authority

13. Meaning given to the word " employer " by the definition referred above is illustrative and not exhaustive . The word" employer " is not specifically defined but merely indicated who is to be considered an employer for the purpose of an industry carried on by or under the authority of a department of Government and by or on behalf of a local authority. An employer means in relation to an

16. The Rules provide for the manner in which posts can be created. Rule 4 spells that the Board of Directors may in consultation with the sponsor bank , creates such number ofposts as are specified in the first schedule to the Rulesfrom time to time . How those posts are to be filled in, that mode is provided by rule 5 and 6 of the Rules . The Chairman of the Bank shall be the appointing authority for all posts in the bank , provides Rule 7. However , if so authorized by the Board of Directors , the General Manager ofthe Bank shall be the appointing authority in respect of all posts classified under group ' B ' and 'C' in the Bank. Recruitment to the post of messenger, messenger- cum- sweeper, driver , driver - cum- sweeper and security guards is to be made by making a reference to the employment [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1399 भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6 , 2010/फाल्गुन 15, 1931

a leave vacancy. Therefore , his appointinen: is also in violation of circular dated 25-7-92.

exchange , sainik board or other agencies , catering welfare of reserved categories , provides rule 10 of the Rules . Sub rule (2) of that rule makes it clear that no candidate other than those sponsored by the employment exchange , sainik board or other agencies , shall be called for interview. Rule II speaks of constitution of a committee , who shall conduct selection of the candidates for the foresaid posts . Therefore, it is emerging over the record that the Chairman or the General Manager, if so authorized by the Board, shall be the appointing authority in respect of all posts in the bank . Thus it is evident that the branch manager is not competent to appoint a messenger cum sweeper against a permanent post .

17. Circular dated 25-7-92 provides that when a regular messenger happens to be on leave for a period of 15 days , a casual employee can be engaged for that period . He is to be removed from the services after expiry ofthat period or when regular messenger joins his duty, which ever is earlier . Consequently a casual messenger can be engaged for a period of 15 days only by the branch manager , when a regular messenger happens to be on leave and not otherwise .

20. When regular messenger was on duty, under these circumstances engagement of Shri Tiwari was not even a stop gap arrangement . It was in violation of the Rules and the circular . Can it be said that Mohd. Gufran made a representation to Mr. Tiwari to the effect that he was competent to appoint him on the post of messenger- cum- sweeper . Circular dated 25-7-92 no where authorizes a branch manager to engage a messenger even for a period of fifteen days , when regular messenger is present on his duty. The said circular binds the branch manager as well as Mr. Tiwari , since it - acquires a position of guidelines issued to the bank authorities . Engagement of Mr. Tiwari in violation of the said circular cannot be termed as an engagement on representation made to him by the branch manager . The Rules have a force of law. Therefore , it cannot be said that Mohd . Gufran gave a representation to Shri Tiwari to the effect that he was competent to engage him as a messenger - cum- sweeper . The claimant could not show thatMohd . Gufran employeed him with express or implied authority of the bank or the bank had privity in that act . The bank , who is a State with the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution. is not bound by the act of Mohd.Gufran , when he acted in opposition to the Rules . Reference can be made to the precedent in A.H. Wheeler & co . ( AIR 1947 A11.236) .

18. As detailed above , Shri Tiwari was not appointed by the Chairman or the General Manager of the bank . No postof a messenger was lying vacant . Name of Shri Tiwari was not sponsored by the employment exchange for appointment to the post of messenger - cum - sweeper . His interview was not taken by the selection committee and he was not selected from amongst the persons sponsored by the employment exchange , sainik board , or other agencies , catering welfare of persons of reserved categories . Consequently it is evident that Shri Tiwari was engaged in violation of the Rules . It is not his case that regular messenger was on leave and he was engaged for a period of15 days , in pursuance of circular dated 25-7-92 . Hence engagement of Shri Tiwari , even as a casual worker by the branch manager , was in violation of the Rules as well as the circular , referred above .

21. Appointment of Mr. Tiwari was in violation of the Rules and it does not confer any right on him . When Mohd. Gufran was incompetent to engage a messengerito cum sweeper . Performance of duties by Shri Tiwari for a specific period would not create any right in his favour to claim that he became an employee of the bank . To claim status of an employee of the bank. it is incumbent upon Mr. Tiwari to establish that he was engaged for the post of messenger cum sweeper in accordance with the procedure laid down in the Rules . Back door entry ofMr. Tiwari would not create any legal obligation on the bank, in respect of hisemploymentby Mohd . Gufran , the branch manger . For establishment of relationship of employce , a responsibility is cast upon Mr.Tiwari to show that he applied for the post of messenger- cum- sweeper . His interview was taken and he was selected in that interview, which took place in compliance of the Rules . There is a vacuum of evidence overthat matter. On the other hand Mr. Tiwari admits that he was engaged by Mohd . Gufran , who was not competent to engage him. Gufran could not contract on behalf of the management bank with Mr. Tiwari for the purpose of his appointment as messenger cum sweeper . Under these circumstances , relationship of employer and employee were never created between Mr. Tiwari and the bank .

19. Deen Bandhu Tiwari claims that he was appointed in Sharif Nagar branch of the Bank on 6-8-98 by Mohd. Gufran , the branch manager . He candidly admits that he was paid @ Rs . 12 per day. Subsequently he was paid@ Rs . 15 per day . However later on he was made to refund a sum of Rs . 827 to the bank on 19-8-99 . Out of facts projected by Shri Tiwari , it is evident that he was not engaged against a whole time post . His engagement was of casual in nature and that too for part time . Engagement by the branch manager was in contravention of the Rules . Since the Rules were notified in Gazette , Shri Tiwari is supposed to have its knowledge . At the cost of repetition it is said that Chairman of the Bank or General Manager , if so authorised , are competent to appoint a messenger - cum- sweeper . No evidence worth name was brought over the record to the effect that Mr. Tiwari was appointed against

22. His engagement does not estop the bank at all from denouncing his claim . The soul of estoppel is equity , not facility for in equity . Nor is estoppel against law is 1400

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MARCH 6 , 2010/ PHALGUNA 15, 1931

permissible because public policy animating a statutory provision may then become the casualty. Where public duties cast by statute are involved , private parties can not prevent performance by involving estoppel . Reference can be made to Ramanathan [ 1973 ( 2) S.C.C. 650 ] , Ram Kumar (1976 S.C.C. 2237) and B. N. Bhattacharjee (AIR 1979 S.C. 1725 ) .

In view of the above discussion , it is held that at no point of time bank engaged Shri Tiwari as messenger- cum- sweeper . There never existed such relationship of employer and employee between the parties

Issue No. 2, 3 and 4

23. It is an admitted case of the claimant that he was appointedby Mohd . Gufran , the branch manager , who paid @ Rs.12/ - per day . He concedes that he had to refund a sum of Rs . 827 , when his services were dispensed with . Though he feigned ignorance about the disciplinary action against Mohd . Gufran , the branch manager , yet he opted not to dispel facts projected by Shri Singh . Shri Singh high- lights that Mohd.Gufran faced departmental action, suffered penalty and reimbursed money paid to Shri Tiwari , besides interest thereon . It was within the knowledge of Shri Tiwari that Mohd. Gufran was not competent to engage him for that post . That knowledge made him to refund a sum of Rs . 827 to the bank , when his services were disengaged.

24. A " seasonal workman " is engaged in ajob which lasts during a particular season only , while a temporary workman may be engaged either for a work of temporary or casual nature or temporarily for work of a permanent nature , but a permanent workman is one who is engaged in a work of permanent nature only . The distinction between permanent workman engaged on a work of permanent nature and a temporary workman engaged on a work of permanent nature is , in fact, that a temporary workman is engaged to fill in a temporary need of extra hands of permanent jobs . Thus when a workman is engaged on a work of permanent nature which lasts throughout the year , it is expected that he would continue there permanently unless he is engaged to fill in a temporary need. In other words he is entitled to expect permanency of his service. Law to this effect was laid by the Apex Court in Jaswant Sugar Mills [ 1961 ( 1 ) LLJ 649].

25.As per the case of the workman his name was not called from the employment exchange to appoint him as messenger- cum- sweeper . It has not been shown by the workman that he was appointed against a permanent vacancy or against a work of permanent nature . Consequently it is evident that the workman was appointed against a work of temporary nature only that too in violation of the Rules. A temporary workman would not acquire permanency of tenure merely because he is employee in a permanent department or given some benefit ordinarily

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] enjoyed by the permanent workman . Such proposition was laid in Rohtas Industries Limited Vs. Brijnandan Pandey [ 1956 ( 2) LLJ 444 ] .

26. Some casual workmen employed in a Canteen , raised demand of permanency in service. The Tribunal directed that from particular date they should be treated as probationer and appointed in permanent vacancy without going into the question as to whether more permanent workmen were necessary to be appointed in the canteen, over and above the existing permanent strength to justify the making of the casual workman as permanent , where they were working . Neither there was any permanent vacancy in existence nor the Tribunal directed for creation of new posts . When the matter reached the Apex Court , it was announced that the Tribunal was not justified in making these directions . The workman may be made permanent only against permanent vacancies and not otherwise , announced the Apex Court in Hindustan Aeronautics Limited Vs. Their workmen [ 1975 ( II ) LLJ 336 ] 27. In Uma Devi [ 2006 ( 4 ) SCC 11 the Apex Court considered the proposition as to whether the persons who gotemployment , without following of a regular procedure or even from the back door or on daily wages can be ordered to be made permanent in their posts , to prevent regular recruitment to the posts concerned . Catena of decisions over the subject were considered and the court declined the submissions of the workmen to be made permanent on the posts which were heldby them in temporary or ad hoc capacity for a fairly long spell . The Court ruled thus :

"With respect , why should the State be allowed to depart from the normal rule and indulge in temporary employment in permanent posts ? This Court , in our view, is bound to insists on the State making regular and proper recruitments , and is bound not to encourage or shut its eyes to the persistent transgression ofthe rules of regular recruitment . The direction tomake permanent - the distinction between regularization and making permanent , was not emphasized here can only encourage the State , the modal employer , to flout its own rules and would confer undue benefits on a few at the cost of many waiting to compete. With respect the directions made in Piara Singh [ 1992 (4 ) SCC 118 ] is to some extent inconsistent with the conclusion in para 45 of the said judgement therein . With great respect , it appears to us that the last of the directions clearly runs counter to the constitutional scheme of employment recognized in the earlier part of the decision . Really , it cannot be said that this decision has laid down the law that all ad- hoc , temporary or casual employees engaged without following a regular recruitment procedure should be made permanent. "

28. Taking note of some of recent decisions , the Apex Court held that the State does not enjoy a power to 1401 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : मार्च 6, 2010/फाल्गुन 15 , 1931

make appointments in terms of article 162 ofthe Constitution . The Court quoted its decision in Girish Jyanti Lai Vaghela [2006 ( 2 ) SCC 482 ] with approval , wherein it was ruled thus .

[ 2004 ( 7 ) SCC 112 ] and ruled that no regularization is permissible in exercise of statutory powers conferred in Article 162 of the Constitution, if the appointments have been made in contravention of the statutory rules . In Soniveer Singh ( 2006 ( 5 ) SCC 493 ] the Apex Court ruled that appointment made without following due procedure cannot be regularized.

30. In view of the facts detailed above , Shri Tiwari , being engaged in violation of the Rules , cannot expect his reinstatement in the services . He could not establish that it waswithin the knowledge of the Chairman of the Bank that his services were engaged for the post of messenger - cum- sweeper. Under these circumstances no evidence was brought over the record to estop the bank from claiming that Shri Tiwari was not its employee . Action of the bank in disengaging him from its service on 19-8-99 was just fair and legal . Bank was not supposed to rectify the illegality committed by its unscrupulous officer . Shri Tiwari is not entitled to any relief. Issues are , therefore , answered in favour of the bank and against Shri Tiwari .

"The appointment to any post under the State can only be made after a proper advertisement has been made inviting applications from eligible candidates and holding of a selection by a body of experts or a specially constituted committee whose members are fair and impartial , through a written examination or interview or some other rational criteria for judging the inter se merit of candidates , who have applied in response to the advertisement made . A regular appointment to the post under the State or Union cannot be made without issuing advertisement in the prescribed manner which may in some cases include inviting applications from the employment exchange , where eligible candidate get their names registered . Any regular appointment made on a post under the State or Union without issuing advertisement inviting applications from eligible candidates and without holding a proper selection where all eligible candidates get a fair chance to compete would violate the guarantee enshrined under article 16 of the Constitution . "

31. Shri Tiwari , who was engaged in violation of the Rules cannot claim reinstatement in service of the bank . His claim statement is devoid of merits . The same is , therefore , dismissed . An award is accordingly passed .

Dated: 22-1-2010

29. In P. Chandra Shekhara Rao and Others [ 2006 (7) SCC 488 ] the Apex Court referred Uma Devi's case (Supra ) with approval . It also relied the decision in a Uma Rani

Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer Printed by the Manager , Government of India Press , Ring Road, Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 .