रजिस्ट्री सं० डी० एल० ( एन ) 04/ 0007/2003-05
REGD . NO . D. L. ( N ) 04 / 0007/2003-05 भारत का राजपत्र सत्यमेव जयते The Gazette of India
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
नई दिल्ली , अगस्त 1 अगस्त 7 , 2010 , शनिवार /श्रावण 10-श्रावण 16 , 1932 NEW DELHI , AUGUST 1 - AUGUST 7 , 2010 , SATURDAY / SHRAVANA 10- SHRAVANA 16 , 1932 सं. 32 ] No. 321
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II- खण्ड 3- उप - खण्ड ( ii) PART II- Section 3-Sub- section ( ii )
भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence )
गृह मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 23 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1912. सरकारी स्थान ( अप्राधिकृत अधिभोगियों की बेदखली ) अधिनियम , 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 में प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , गृह मंत्रालय , भारत सरकार के दिनांक 16 नवम्बर , 2009 की अधिसूचना संख्या एस.ओ. 3119 जो कि दिनांक 21 नवम्बर , 2009 को भारत के राजपत्र , भाग -2 उप सेक्शन ( ii ) में प्रकाशित हुई है , में संशोधन करती है :-
उपर्युक्त अधिसूचना के क्रम संख्या 1 के कालम 3 में शब्द " एवं राजारहट , न्यू टाऊन " को हटाया जाता है ।
[फा. सं. ए- II - 14/98-2009- प्रशासन-1 ( पूर्वी सेक्टर ) - गृह मंत्रालय - पी.एफ- III ]
एच. कामसुआनथंग , अवर सचिव MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS New Delhi , the 23rd July , 2010
S.O. 1912. In exercise of the powers confered by Section 3 of the Public premises (Eviction of unauthorized Occupants ) Act, 1971 ( 40 of 1971 ) , the Central Government hereby amends the notification of the Government of India , 2904 G1/ 2010
(4683)
Ministry of Home Affairs No. S.O. 3119 dated the 16th November , 2009 published in the Gazette of Inida , Part II , Section ( 3 ) , Sub- section ( ii ) , dated the 21st November , 2009 , namely: ---
In the said notification , against Sl . No. 1 , in column 3 , the words " and Rajarhat , New Town " shall be omitted.
[ F. No. A.II - 14/98-2009 - Adm . I ( ES ) -MHA - PF . III ] H. KAMSUANTHANG , Under Secy.
कार्मिक , लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय (कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग ) नई दिल्ली, 27 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1913. केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 ( 1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25 ) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, हरियाणा राज्य सरकार , गृह विभाग , चंडीगढ़ की अधिसूचना सं. 20/5/2010-3 एचजी। दिनांक 4 जून , 2010 द्वारा प्राप्त सहमति से तेजास गाबा के अपहरण के संबंध में भारतीय दंड संहिता , 1860 ( 1860 का अधिनियम सं. 45 ) की धारा 364 और 307 तथा शस्त्र अधिनियम , 1959 ( 1959 का अधिनियम सं. 54 ) की धारा 25 , 54 और 59 के अधीन पुलिस स्टेशन माडल टाउन , पानीपत 4684
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
में दर्ज एफआईआर सं. 531 दिनांक 12-12-2008 के अन्वेषण के लिए तथा उपर्युक्त के संबंध में प्रयास , दुष्प्रेरण तथा षडयंत्र तथा इसी संव्यवहार के क्रम में या उन्ही तथ्यों से उदृत किसी अपराध/अपराधों के संबंध में दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और क्षेत्राधिकार का विस्तार एतद्वारा सम्पूर्ण हरियाणा राज्य के संबंध में करती है ।
[सं. 228/48 / 2010 - ए वी डी -11 ) मुकेश चतुर्वेदी , अवर पांचव MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL , PUBLIK GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS (Department of Personnel and Training) New Delhi , the 27th July, 2010
S.O. 1913. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 ( Act No. 25 of 1946 ) , the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Haryana , Home Department , Chandigarh , vide Notification No. 20/ 5 / 2010 - HG - 1 dated 4th June, 2010 , hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishmen to the whole of the State of Haryana for Investigation of FIR No. 531 dated 12-12-2008 under Sections 364 and 307 of Indian Penal Code , 1860 ( Act No. 45 of 1860) and Sections 25 , 54 and 59 of the Arms Act , 1959 ( Act No. 54 of 1959 ) registered at Police Station Model Town , Panipat relating to kidnapping of Tejas Gaba and attempts , abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with the above mentioned offences and any other offence/ offences committed in course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts .
[No. 228 /48 / 2010 - AVD - II ] MUKESH CHATURVEDI , Under Secy .
नई दिल्ली , 30 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1914, केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा अपराध प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 ( 1974 का अधिनियम सं. 2 ) की धारा 24 की उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए गुजरात राज्य में सत्र न्यायालय एवं जिला न्यायालय तथा गुजरात उच्च न्यायालय में लंबित आरसी 4 ( एस ) /2010 - एससीबी/मुंबई ( सोहराबुद्दीन शेख की कथित नकली मुठभेड ) में सर्वश्री के.टी.एस. तुलसी और महिन एन . प्रधान, एडवोकेटों को अपीलों , पुनरीक्षणों या इससे संबंधित अन्य मामलों तथा सम्बद्ध मामलों या गुजरात के उच्च न्यायालय में या अन्य किसी सक्षम क्षेत्राधिकार में संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
[सं. 225 /34/ 2010 - ए वी डी- II ] मुकेश चतुर्वेदी , अवर सचिव
[ PART II SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] New Delhi , the 30th July , 2010
S.O. 1914. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 8 ) of Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints S / Shri K.T.S. Tulsi and Maheen N. Pradhan Pal Singh , Advocates as Special Public Prosecutor for conducting prosecution of cases RC. 4 ( S )/ 2010 - SCB /Mumbai ( alleged fake encounter of Sohrabuddin Sheikh ) pending in the Gujarat High Court and in the District and Sessions Court in the State of Gujarat and appeals , revision and any other matter connected therewith or incidental thereto in the High Court of Gujarat and any other court of competent jurisdiction. [No. 225 /34 /2010 - AVD - II ] MUKESH CHATURVEDI , Under Secy .
कार्यालय आयुक्त , केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क , सीमा शुल्क एवं सेवाकर
भोपाल , 7 जुलाई , 2010 सं. 09/2010
का. आ. 1915. श्री आर. पी. खरे एवं श्री ए. के. मिश्रा अधीक्षक समूह " ग " केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क , सीमा शुल्क एवं सेवा कर आयुक्तालय , भोपाल से निवर्तन की आयु प्राप्त करने पर , दिनांक 30 जून , 2010 के अपरान्ह में शासकीय सेवा से निवृत्त हुऐ ।
[ फा. सं. II ( 25 ) /01/2000/स्था.-1/2199 ] देवज्योति भट्टाचार्य , अपर आयुक्त ( का. एवं स. ) OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER , CUSTOMS , CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX Bhopal , the 7th July, 2010 No. 09-2010
S.O. 1915. The officers of Customs & Central Excise Commissionerate , Bhopal having attained the age superannuation retiredfrom Government Service on the dates mentioned before their name :
S. Name of the Officer Designation No.
Date of retirement on Superannuation
30-06-2010 1. Shri R. P. Khare 2. Shri A. K. Mishra
Superintendent Superintendent 30-06-2010
[ C. No. II (25 ) 01 /2000/Et . 1/8136 ] D. BHATTACHARYA , Addl . Commissioner ( P& V) भोपाल , 22 जुलाई , 2010 सं. 10/2010
का. आ. 1916. श्री नंदराम कश्यप , कर सहायक , केंद्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क, प्रभाग सागर , आयुक्तालय भोपाल का निधन दिनांक 09-06-2010 को हो गया है ।
[ पत्र सं. 11 ( 25 ) 01/2000/स्था. 1/2396 ] डी. भट्टाचार्य , अपर आयुक्त (का. /स. ) भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
Bhopal , the 22nd July , 2010 No. 10/2010
S.O. 1916.- Shri Nandram Kashyap , T.A. , Central Excise & Customs , Div . Sagar , Bhopal Commissionerate has passed away on 09-06-2010 .
[ F. No. II (25 )01 /2000 /Et . I/ 8744 ] D. BHATTACHARYA , Addl . Commissioner ( P & V)
वित्त मंत्रालय (वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग ) नई दिल्ली , 26 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1917. राष्ट्रीय कृषि और ग्रामीण विकास बैंक अधिनियम , 1981 की धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 2 ) के साथ पठित धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करके , एतद्वारा , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक के केन्द्रीय बोर्ड के श्री लक्ष्मी चन्द तथा श्रीमती शशि राजगोपालन को दिनांक 16-10-2012 तक की अवधि के लिए अथवा भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक के केन्द्रीय बोर्ड में सरकार द्वारा उनके उत्तराधिकारी की नियुक्ति की तिथि तक अथवा अगले आदेशों तक , जो भी पहले हो , राष्ट्रीय कृषि और ग्रामीण विकास बैंक ( नाबार्ड ) के निदेशक मण्डल में निदेशक के रूप में पुनः नामित करती है ।
[ फा. सं. 7/4/2004- बीओ -1 ] सुमिता डावरा , निदेशक MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Financial Services ) New Delhi , the 26th July, 2010
S.O. 1917. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( c ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 read with sub- section (2 ) of Section 7 of the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Act , 1981 , the Central Government , in consultation with Reserve Bank of India , hereby re- nominates Shri Lakshmi Chand and Smt . Shashi Rajagopalan from the Central Board of Reserve Bank of India as Directors on the Board of Directors of National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD ) for a period upto 16-10-2012 or the day their successor is appointed by the Government on the Central Board of Reserve Bank of India or until further orders , whichever is earlier.
[ F. No. 7 /4/2004 - BO . I ] SUMITA DAWARA , Director नई दिल्ली , 27 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1918. राष्ट्रीय कृषि और ग्रामीण विकास बैंक अधिनियम , 1981 ( 1981 का 61 ) की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ङ ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार,
4685 एतद्वारा , निम्नलिखित व्यक्तियों को इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से तीन वर्षों की अवधि के लिए राष्ट्रीय कृषि और ग्रामीण विकास बैंक ( नाबार्ड ) के निदेशक मण्डल में निदेशक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है :-
1. प्रधान सचिव ( कृषि ) /कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त, बिहार सरकार , पटना ।
2. प्रधान सचिव ( कृषि ) /कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त , राजस्थान सरकार , जयपुर ।
[फा. सं. 7/4/2009- बीओ -1 ] सुमिता डावरा , निदेशक New Delhi , the 27th July , 2010
S.O. 1918. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( e) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Act , 1981 , (61. of 1981 ) , the Central Government hereby appoints the following persons to be the directors on the board of directors of National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD ) for a period of three years with effect from the date of issue of this notification :-
1. Principal Secretary ( Agriculture)/ Agricultural Production Commissioner , Government of Bihar , Patna .
2. Principal Secretary (Agriculture) / Agricultural Production Commissioner , Government of Rajasthan , Jaipur .
[F. No. 7/4/2009 - BO. -I ] SUMITA DAWARA , Director नई दिल्ली , 29 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1919.-राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबन्ध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम , 1970/1980 के खण्ड 3 के उप खण्ड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ज ) और ( 3 - क ) द्वारा प्रदत्तः शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा , श्री एन वी आर रेडडी ( जन्म तिथि 21-06-1952 ) को अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्षों की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगला आदेश होने तक, जो भी पहले हो , आंध्रा बैंक के निदेशक मंडल में अंशकालिक गैर- सरकारी निदेशक के रूप नामित करती है ।
[फा. सं. 9/56/2009- बीओ -1 ] सुमिता डावरा , निदेशक New Delhi , the 29th July , 2010
S.O. 1919.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section 3 ( h ) and (3 - A) of Section 9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer of Undertakings ) Act , 4686
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16. 1932
[ PART 11 S.3 ( 1)
Andhra Bank for a period of three years from tine date of notification or until further orders , whichever is earlier .
[ F. No. 9 / 56 /2009 - BO . - 1 ]
SUMITA DAWARA, Director 1970/1980 read with sub- clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 of The Nationalised Banks (Management & Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme , 1970/1980 , the Central Government hereby nominates Shri NVR Reddy (DoB : 21-06-1952 ) as part- time non - official director on the Board of Directors of
नई दिल्ली , 30 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1920. राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) योजना , 1970/1980 के खण्ड 3 के उप खण्ड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उपधारा 3 के खंड ( ग ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्द्वारा , नीचे दी गई सारणी के कॉलम ( 3 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट व्यक्तियों को उक्त सारणी के कॉलम ( 2 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट व्यक्तियों के स्थान पर इसके कॉलम ( 1 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट बैंकों के निदेशक के रूप में तत्काल प्रभाव से और अगले आदेश होने तक नामित करती है :
सारणी
क्रम सं. बैंक का नाम
वर्तमान निदेशक का नाम
प्रस्तावित व्यक्तियों का नाम 2
1
3
4
1 . केनरा बैंक
श्रीमती वाणी जे . शर्मा
श्री जी. पदमनाभन ,
मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , भुगतान एवं संदाय प्रणाली विभाग , केन्द्रीय कार्यालय : केन्द्रीय कार्यालय बिल्डिंग ,
14वां तल , शहीद भगत सिंह रोड , मुम्बई -01 2. बैंक आफ बड़ौदा
श्री आर. गांधी,
श्री ए. सोमासुन्दरम
मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , मुद्रा प्रबंधन विभाग , केन्द्रीय कार्यालय , अमर भवन , चौथा तल , पी एम रोड , मुम्बई -01 3. सेन्ट्रल बैंक आफ इंडिया श्री एम. के . भटटाचार्य
श्री सलीम गंगाधरन ,
प्रभारी मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , विदेशी विनिमय विभाग , केन्द्रीय कार्यालय , 11 वां तल , केन्द्रीय कार्यालय बिल्डिंग , 14वां तल, शहीद भगत सिंह रोड , मुम्बई -01 4. पंजाब नैशनल बैंक
श्री एल . एम. फोन्सिका
श्री जसबीर सिंह ,
क्षेत्रीय निदेशक , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक , केन्द्रीय विस्ता, टेलीफोन भवन के सामने , सेक्टर -17 , चण्डीगढ़ -17 5. बैंक आफ इंडिया
श्री ए. वी . सरदेसाई
श्री जी. महालिंगम ,
क्षेत्रीय निदेशक, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक , पोस्ट बाक्स सं. 162 , साउथ गांधी मैदान , पटना- (01 6. इंडियन ओवरसीज बैंक श्रीमती चित्रा चन्द्रमौलीस्वर्ण
श्री एस. वी. राघवन ,
प्रभारी मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , सरकार और बैंक के खाते विभाग , केन्द्रीय कार्यालय , चौथा तल , बायकुला कार्यालय भवन , मुम्बई सेंट्रल स्टेशन के सामने , बायकुला , मुम्बई -08
7. इलाहाबाद बैंक
श्री मोहम्मद ताहिर
श्री एस. रामास्वामी ,
मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , व्यय एवं बजटीय नियंत्रण विभाग , केन्द्रीय कार्यालय : पोस्ट बाक्स सं. 406 , दूसरा तल , मेन बिल्डिंग , शहीद भगत सिंह रोड , मुम्बई (01 8.
श्री एस. के गोगिया
बैंक आफ महाराष्ट्र
श्रीमती कमला राजन ,
प्रिंसिपल , कालेज आफ एग्रीकल्चरल बैंकिंग , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक , यूनिवर्सिटी रोड , पुणे -411016 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010 / श्रावण 16 , 1932
2
3
आन्ध्रा बैंक
श्री बी. महेश्वरन 9.
10. यूनियन बैंक आफ इंडिया श्री के शिवारमन कार्पोरेशन बैंक
11 .
श्री एम. ए. श्रीनिवासन 12. इंडियन बैंक
श्री सी. आर . गोपालसुन्दरम 13.
श्री एन. पी. सिन्हा यूको बैंक
14. देना बैंक
श्री चन्द्र किशोर 15.
श्री एस. के. न्यूले ओरियंटल बैंक आफ कामर्स
16. पंजाब एंड सिंध बैंक
श्री आर. सदानन्दम 17. विजया बैंक
श्री के. वेंकटप्पा सिंडिकेट बैंक
18.
श्री के. सीतारामू
श्री टी. बंधोपाध्याय 19. युनाइटेड बैंक आफ इंडिया
4687 4
श्री के. आर. आनन्द ,
क्षेत्रीय निदेशक , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक , पोस्ट बाक्स सं. 40 , फोर्ट ग्लेसिस , 16 राजाजी सलाई , चेन्नै -600001 श्रीमती मीना हेमचन्द्रा,
प्रभारी मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , विदेशी निवेश और परिचालन विभाग , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक , केन्द्रीय कार्यालय : केन्द्रीय कार्यालय बिल्डिंग , 22वां तल , शहीद भगत सिंह रोड, मुम्बई -01
श्रीमती ग्रेस कोशी ,
मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , सचिव विभाग , केन्द्रीय कार्यालय :
केन्द्रीय कार्यालय बिल्डिंग , 16वां तल , शहीद भगत सिंह रोड , मुम्बई -01
श्री एस. करुप्पासामी ,
क्षेत्रीय निदेशक , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक , 15 , एन एस रोड , कोलकाता-700001
श्रीमती उमा शंकर ,
मुख्य महाप्रबंधक , शहरी बैंक विभाग , केन्द्रीय कार्यालय , प्रथम तल , गार्मेंट हाउस , पोस्ट बाक्स सं. 6587 , वर्ली , मुम्बई -400018
श्री बी. पी. विजयेन्द्र ,
मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक , ग्रामीण आयोजना और ऋण विभाग , केन्द्रीय कार्यालय केन्द्रीय कार्यालय बिल्डिंग , शहीद भगत सिंह रोड , मुम्बई-01
श्री बी. श्रीनिवास ,
मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, निक्षेप बीमा और ऋण गारंटी निगम , प्रधान कार्यालय , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक भवन , द्वितीय तल , मुम्बई सेंट्रल रेलवे स्टेशन के सामने , पोस्ट बाक्स सं. 4571 , मुम्बई सेंट्रल , मुम्बई -400001
श्री बी. पी. कानूनगो,
क्षेत्रीय निदेशक, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक , पोस्ट बाक्स सं. 12, रामबाग सर्किल , टाँक रोड , जयपुर-302004 श्रीमती सुमा वर्मा ,
क्षेत्रीय निदेशक , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक , पोस्ट बाक्स सं. 6507 , बेकरी जंक्शन , तिरुवनंतपुरम-695003 श्री ए. एस. राव ,
क्षेत्रीय निदेशक, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक , संख्या 1 , 6-1-56 , सचिवालय रोड , सैफाबाद , हैदराबाद -500004 श्रीमती एस. मराण्डी,
मुख्य महाप्रबंधक, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक , ए-1 , पंचशील अपार्टमेंट , ब्रह्मपुत्र क्रिश्चियन बस्ती , जी एस रोड , गुवाहाटी-781005
[फा. सं. 9 /2/2007- बीओ -1 ]
सुमिता डावरा , निदेशक 4688
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
New Delhi , the 30th July , 2010
S.O. 1920. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( c) of sub- section 3 of Section 9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer of Undertakings ) Act , 1970/1980 read with sub- clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 of The Nationalised Banks ( Management & Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme , 1970/1980 , the Central Government , hereby nominates the persons specified in column (3 ) of the table below as Directors of Nationalized Banks specified in column ( 1 ) thereof in place of the persons specified in column (2 ) of said Table , with immediate effect and until further orders :-
TABLE Name of the Bank
Sl . No.
Name of the Existing Director
3
1
2
1 Canara Bank
Smt . Vani J. Sharma 2 Bank of Baroda
Shri A. Somasundaram 3 Central Bank of India
Shri M.K. Bhattacharya 4
Shri L.M. Fonseca Punjab National Bank
5 Bank of India
Shri A.V. Sardesai 6 Indian Overseas Bank
Name of the persons proposed
4
Shri G. Padmanabhan , CGM , D/ o Payment & Settlement Systems , Central Office : Central Office Bldg . , 14th Floor , Shahid Bhagat Singh Road, Mumbai - 01 .
Shri R. Gandhi , CGM, D/ o Currency Management , Central Office , Amar Bldg , 4th Floor , P.M. Road, Mumbai -01 .
Shri Salim Gangadharan , CGM - in- Charge , Foreign Exchange Department, Central Office , 11th Floor , Central Office Bldg . , Shahid Bhagat Singh Road , Mumbai -01 .
Shri Jasbir Singh , Regional Director , Reserve Bank of India , Central Vista , Opp . Telephone Bhawan , Sector- 17 , Chandigarh - 17.
Shri G. Mahalingam , Regional Director , Reserve Bank of India , PB No. 162 , South Gandhi Maidan , Patna - 01 .
Smt . Chitra Chandramouliswaran
7 Allahabad Bank
Shri Mohammad Tahir 8 Bank of Maharashtra
Shri S.K. Gogia 9 Andhra Bank
Shri B. Maheshwaran Shri S. V. Raghavan , CGM - in- Charge , D/ o Government & Bank Accounts , Central Office , 4th Floor , Byculla Office Bldg . , Mumbai Central Station , Byculla , Mumbai - 08 .
Shri S. Ramaswamy , CGM, D/ o Expenditure & Budgetary Control , Central Office , PB No. 406 , 2nd Floor , Main Building , Shahid Bhagat Singh Road , Mumbai -01 .
Smt . Kamala Rajan , Principal , College of Agricultural Banking, Reserve Bank of India , University Road , Pune-411016 .
Shri K.R. Ananda , Regional Director , Reserve Bank of India , PB No. 40 , Fort Glacis , 16 Rajaji Salai , Chennai - 600 001 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
3
2
1
4689
Shri K. Siva Raman
10 Union Bank of India
Smt . Meena Hemchandra, CGM- in- Charge , D /o External Investments & Operations , Reserve Bank of India, Central Office, 22nd Floor, Central Office Bldg. , Shahid Bhagat Singh Road, Mumbai -400 001 .
Shri M.A. Srinivasan
11 Corporation Bank
12 Indian Bank
Smt. Grace Koshie , CGM, Secretary's Department , Central Office Bldg. , 16th Floor , Shahid Bhagat Singh Road , Mumbai -400001 .
Shri C.R. Gopalasundaram
13 UCO Bank
Shri S. Karuppasamy , Regional Director , Reserve Bank of India , 15 , N.S. Road, Kolkata - 700 001 .
Shri N.P. Sinha
Smt . Uma Shankar , CGM , Urban Banks Department , Central Office, 1st Floor , Garment House , PB No. 6587 , Worli , Mumbai -400018 .
Shri Chandra Kishore
14 Dena Bank
15
Shri B.P. Vijayendra , CGM , Reserve Bank of India , Rural Planning and Credit Department, Central Office , Shahid Bhagat Singh Road , Mumbai -400 001 .
Shri S.K. Newlay
Oriental Bank of Commerce
16
Shri B. Srinivas , CGM , Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation , Head Office , Reserve Bank of India Bldg. , 2nd Floor , Opp . Mumbai Central Railway Station , PB No. 4571 , Mumbai Central , Mumbai -400 001 .
Shri R. Sadanandam
Punjab & Sind Bank
17 Vijay Bank
Shri B.P. Kanungo , Regional Director , Reserve Bank of India , PB No. 12 , Rambagh Circle , Tonk Road , Jaipur-302 004.
Shri K. Venkatappa
Smt . Suma Varma , Regional Director , Reserve Bank of India , Bakery Junction , PB No. 6507 , Thiruvananthapuram - 695 003 .
Shri K. Setharamu
18 Syndicate Bank
19 United Bank of India
Shri A.S. Rao , Regional Director , Reserve Bank of India , No. 1 , 6-1-56 , Secretariat Road , Saifabad, Hyderabad - 500 004.
Shri T. Bandopadhyay
Smt . S. Marandi , CGM, Reserve Bank of India, A - 1 , Panchsheel Apartments , Brahmaputra Christian Basti , G.S. Road , Guwahati - 781 005 .
[ F. No. 9 /2/2007 -BO.I ] SUMITA DAWARA , Director 4690
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2010/ SHRAVANΑ 16 , 1932
(राजस्व विभाग )
( केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड )
नई दिल्ली, 28 जुलाई , 2010
(आयकर )
का.आ. 1921.-जबकि आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( 1961 का 43 ) की धारा 80 झक की उपधारा ( 4 ) के खंड ( iii ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार ने भारत सरकार के वित्त मंत्रालय , राजस्व विभाग , केन्द्रीय प्रत्यक्ष कर बोर्ड की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 51 ( अ ) , दिनांक 8 जनवरी , 2008 के जरिए औद्योगिक पार्क के लिए स्कीम तैयार और अधिसूचित की है;
और जबकि मैसर्स डीएलएफ साइबर सिटी डेवेलपर्स लिमिटेड , जिनका पंजीकृत पता शॉपिंग मॉल काम्प्लैक्स , अर्जुन मार्ग , डीएलएफ , फेस -1 , गुड़गांव , हरियाणा-122002 है , में डीएलएफ सिटी , गुड़गांव , हरियाणा के सेक्टर-24 , 25 , 25ए में बिल्डिग संख्या 7 , 7ए, 7बी , 8 , 9ए , बी , 10 तथा इनफिनिटी टावर , ( ब्लाक-3 /टावर - सी ) में एक औद्योगिक पार्क विकसित किया है;.
अतः अब आयकर नियमावली , 1962 के नियम 18 ग के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 80झक की उपधारा ( 4 ) के खंड (iii ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा मैसर्स डीएलएफ साइबर सिटी डेवेलपर्स लिमिटेड को एक उपक्रम के रूप में तथा डीएलएफ सिटी , गुड़गांव , हरियाणा के सेक्टर -24 , 25 , 25ए में बिल्डिंग संख्या 7 , 7ए , 7बी , 8 , 9ए , 9 बी , 10 तथा इनफिनिटी टावर , ( ब्लाक-3 /टावर- सी) में उक्त उपक्रम द्वारा विकसित एवं अनुरक्षित तथा प्रचालित की जा रही परियोजना को उक्त खंड के प्रयोजनार्थ औद्योगिक पार्क के रूप में अधिसूचित करती है । 2. उपर्युक्त औद्योगिक पार्क के शुरू होने की तिथि 25 जनवरी , 2010 है ।
3. अधिसूचना अमान्य होगी और मैसर्स डीएलएफ साइबर सिटी डेवेलपर्स लिमिटेड, गुड़गांव इस अमान्यता के किसी परिणाम के लिए पूरी तरह जिम्मेदार होगा , यदि
( i ) इसके द्वारा प्रस्तुत आवेदन और परवर्ती दस्तावेजों जिनके आधार पर केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा अधिसूचना जारी की जाती है , में गलत सूचना/झूठी सूचना हो अथवा कोई महत्वपूर्ण सूचना प्रदान न की गई हो ।
( ii ) यह ऐसे औद्योगिक पार्क के स्थान के लिए हो जिसके लिए अधिसूचना पहले ही अन्य उपक्रम के नाम जारी की जा चुकी हो ।
4. केन्द्र सरकार के अनुमोदन के बिना परियोजना की योजना में किसी संशोधन से अथवा भविष्य में अधिक ज्ञान होने अथवा आवेदक द्वारा किसी महत्वपूर्ण तथ्य को उजागर न किए जाने से औद्योगिक पार्क का अनुमोदन अमान्य हो जाएगा ।
[ अधिसूचना सं. 66/2010/फा. सं. 178/81/2008 ] आ.क.नि. - 1 ]
पदम सिंह , अवर सचिव
[PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii) ] (Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES ) New Delhi , the 28th July , 2010
(INCOME-TAX)
S.O. 1921.- Where the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( iii ) of sub- section (4) of section 80 - IA of the Income-tax Act , 1961 (43 of 1961 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , has framed and notified a scheme for industrial park , by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue , Central Board of Direct Taxes) number S.O. 51 (E ) , dated the 8th January, 2008;
And whereas M/ s . DLF Cyber City Developers Limited, having its registered address at Shopping Mall Complex, Arjun Marg , DLF City Phase 1 , Gurgaon , Haryana - 122002 , has developed an Industrial Park at Building No. 7A , 7B , 8 , 9A , 9B, 10 and Infinity Towers (Block 3 /Tower C) in Sector 24 , 25, 25A DLF City, Gurgaon, Haryana;
Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( iii ) of sub -section (4) of section 80 - IA of the said Act read with rule 18 C of the Income Tax Rules , 1962 , the Central Government hereby notifies M / s . DLF Cyber CityDevelopers Limited as an undertaking and the project atBuilding No. 7A , 7B , 8 , 9A , 9B , 10 and Infinity Towers (Block 3 /Tower C) in Sector 24, 25, 25A DLF City, Gurgaon , Haryana , being developed and being maintained and operated by the said undertaking , as an industrial park for the purposes of the said clause .
2. The date of commencement of the aforesaid industrial park is 25th January , 2010.
3.The notification will be invalid and Mrs. DLF Cyber City Developers Limited , Gurgaon , shall be solely responsible for any repercussions of such invalidity, if.
(1) the application and subsequent documents furnished by it , on the basis of which the notification is issued by the Central Government contains wrong information or misinformation or some material information has not been provided in it;
(ii) It is for the location of the industrial park for which notification has already been issued in the name of another undertaking .
4. Any amendment of the project plan without the approval of the Central Government or detection in future, or failure on the part of the applicant to disclose any material fact, will invalidate the approval of the industrial park .
[Notification No. 66/2010/F . No. 178/ 81 / 2008 - ITA -1 ] PADAM SINGH , Under Secy.
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4691
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7, 2010/ श्रावण 16, 1932
नई दिल्ली , 28 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1922.-सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचत किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली, 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5 ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम, 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ1-4-2005 ( कर निर्धारण वर्ष 2006-2007 ) के आगे से संगठन के ई एम हॉस्पिटल रिसर्च सेंटर , पुणे को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगी ' अन्य संस्था की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थात :-
(i ) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;
(ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा;
(iii) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता बही रखेगा अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि उसमें दर्शाई गई हो, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;
(iv ) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित ऐसे विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।
2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनुमोदन वापस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-
(क) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नही रखेगा; अथवा
(ख) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा (ग ) पैराग्राफ 1 के उप- पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा
(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा
2904 GI /2010-2
(ड. ) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा । [ अधिसूचना सं. 64/2010 /फा. सं. 203/25/2009- आ.क.नि. - 11 ] अजय गोयल , निदेशक ( आ.क.नि. - 11) New Delhi , the 28th July, 2010
S.O. 1922. It is hereby notified for general information that the organization KEM Hospital Research Centre , Pune has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clasue ( ii ) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ( said Act ) , read with Rules 5C and 5E of the Income - tax Rules , 1962 (said Rules ) , for the period 1-4-2005 ( Assessment Year 2006-2007 ) onwards in the category of ' Other Institute ' , partly engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely :--
(i) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific research;
(ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students ;
(iii) The approved organization shall maintain Separate books of accounts in respect ofthe sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub - section ( 2) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income- tax or the Director of Income- tax having jurisdiction over the case, by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub- section ( 1 ) of section 139 of the said Act;
(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above .
2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization :
(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub- paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1; or
(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub - paragraph (iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or 4692
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/SHRAVANA 16, 1932
(c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub - paragraph ( iv ) of paragraph 1 ; or
(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or
(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii) of sub - section ( 1) of Section 35 of the said Act read with rules 5C and 5E of the said Rules .
[Notification No. 64/2010/F . No. 203 /25 /2009 /ITA - 11 ] AJAY GOYAL , Director ( ITA - II ) नई दिल्ली , 28 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1923. सर्वसाधारण की जानकारी के लिए एतद्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि केन्द्र सरकार द्वारा आयकर नियमावली , 1962 ( उक्त नियमावली ) के नियम 5 ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित आयकर अधिनियम , 1961 ( उक्त अधिनियम ) की धारा 35 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रयोजनार्थ कर निर्धारण वर्ष 1-4-2003 से 31-3-2006 तक संगठन टेकनोलॉजी इंफार्मेशन , फोरकास्टिंग एंड असेसमेंट काउंसिल ( टाईफैक ) , नई दिल्ली को निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन अनुसंधान कार्यकलापों में लगी ' संस्था' की श्रेणी में अनुमोदित किया गया है , अर्थात्
(i ) अनुमोदित संगठन को प्रदत्त राशि का उपयोग वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए किया जाएगा;
(ii ) अनुमोदित संगठन अपने संकाय सदस्यों अथवा अपने नामांकित छात्रों के माध्यम से वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान करेगा;
( iii) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए इसके द्वारा प्राप्त राशि के संबंध में अलग खाता बही रखेगा अनुसंधान करने के लिए प्रयुक्त राशि उसमें दर्शाई गई हो , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 288 की उप- धारा (2 ) के स्पष्टीकरण में यथा परिभाषित किसी लेखाकार से अपनी खाता- बही की लेखा परीक्षा कराएगा और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 139 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अंतर्गत आय विवरणी प्रस्तुत करने की नियत तिथि तक ऐसे लेखाकार द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित एवं हस्ताक्षरित लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट मामले में क्षेत्राधिकार रखने वाले आयकर आयुक्त अथवा आयकर निदेशक को प्रस्तुत करेगा;
( iv) अनुमोदित संगठन वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त दान तथा प्रयुक्त राशि का अलग विवरण रखेगा और उपर्युक्त लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट के साथ लेखा परीक्षक द्वारा विधिवत सत्यापित ऐसे विवरण की प्रति प्रस्तुत करेगा ।
2. केन्द्र सरकार यह अनमोदन वापस ले लेगी यदि अनुमोदित संगठन:-
[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ] (क) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iii ) में उल्लिखित लेखा बही नहीं रखेगा; अथवा
(ख ) पैराग्राफ । के उप- पैराग्राफ (iii ) में उल्लिखित अपनी लेखा परीक्षा रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा ( ग ) पैराग्राफ । के उप-पैराग्राफ ( iv ) में उल्लिखित वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए प्राप्त एवं प्रयुक्त दान का अपना विवरण प्रस्तुत नहीं करेगा; अथवा
(घ) अपना अनुसंधान कार्य करना बंद कर देगा अथवा इसके अनुसंधान कार्य को जायज नहीं पाया जाएगा; अथवा
(ड) उक्त नियमावली के नियम 5 ग और 5ङ के साथ पठित उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 35 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( ii ) के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप नहीं होगा तथा उनका पालन नहीं करेगा ।
[अधिसूचना सं. 63/2010/फा. सं. 203/ 133/2009--आ.का.नि.- II] अजय गोयल , निदेशक ( आ.का.नि. - 11) New Delhi , the 28th July , 2010
S.O. 1923 .--It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Technology Information , Forecasting & Assessment Council ( TIFAC) , New Delhi has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause ( ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the Income-tax Act , 1961 ( said Act) , read with Rules 5C and 5E ofthe Income-tax Rules , 1962 ( said Rules ) , for the period 1-4-2003 to 31-3-2006 in the category of ' Institution' engaged in research activities subject to the following conditions , namely :----
(i) The sums paid to the approved organization shall be utilized for scientific reserach;
( ii) The approved organization shall carry out scientific research through its faculty members or its enrolled students ;
(iii) The approved organization shall maintain Separate books of accounts in respect of the sums received by it for scientific research , reflect therein the amounts used for carrying out research , get such books audited by an accountant as defined in the explanation to sub- section ( 2) of Section 288 of the said Act and furnish the report of such audit duly signed and verified by such accountant to the Commissioner of Income- tax or the Director of Income - tax having jurisdiction over the case, by the due date of furnishing the return of income under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 139 of the said Act;
(iv) The approved organization shall maintain a separate statement of donations received and amounts applied for scientific research and a [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
copy of such statement duly certified by the auditor shall accompany the report of audit referred to above .
2. The Central Government shall withdraw the approval if the approved organization :-
(a) fails to maintain separate books of accounts referred to in sub - paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or
(b) fails to furnish its audit report referred to in sub - paragraph ( iii ) of paragraph 1 ; or (c) fails to furnish its statement of the donations received and sums applied for scientific research referred to in sub - paragraph ( iv) of paragraph 1 ; or
(d) ceases to carry on its research activities or its research activities are not found to be genuine; or
(e) ceases to conform to and comply with the provisions of clause ( ii ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 35 of the said Act read with rules 5C and 5E of the said Rules .
[Notification No. 63 /2010 /F . No. 203 / 133 /2009 /ITA - II ] AJAY GOYAL , Director ( ITA - II ) सूचना एवं प्रसारण मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 20 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1924 , इस मंत्रालय की दिनांक 10-11-2009 की समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के अनुक्रम में और चलचित्र ( प्रमाणन ) नियमावली , 1983 के नियम 7 और 8 के साथ पठित चलचित्र अधिनियम , 1952 ( 1952 का 37 ) की धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केंद्र सरकार , श्री संदीप बलहारा , वीपीओ बाहु अकबर पुर , पन्ना देव राज , तहसील एवं जिला रोहतक को , तत्काल प्रभाव से दो वर्षों की अवधि के लिए या अगले आदेश होने तक , इनमें से जो भी पहले घटित हो , केंद्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड के दिल्ली सलाहकार पैनल के सदस्य के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
[फा. सं. 809/8/ 2009- एफ ( सी ) ]
अमिताभ कुमार , निदेशक ( फिल्म ) MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING
New Delhi , the 20th July , 2010
S.O. 1924. In continuation of this Ministry's Notification of even number , dated 10-11-2009 and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 ( 37 of 1952 ) read with rules 7 and 8 of the Cinematograph ( Certification) Rules , 1983 , the Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri Sandeep Balhara , VPO Bahu Akbar Pur , Panna Dev Raj , Teh . & Distt . Rohtak as a member of the Delhi Advisory
4693
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
Panel of the Central Board of Film Certification with immediate effect for a period of two years or until further orders , whichever is earlier .
[F. No. 809/8 /2009 - F ( C ) ] AMITABH KUMAR , Director ( Films) नई दिल्ली , 20 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1925.-इस मंत्रालय की दिनांक 10-11-2009 की समसंख्यक अधिसूचना के अनुक्रम में और चलचित्र ( प्रमाणन ) नियमावली, 1983 के नियम 7 और 8 के साथ पठित चलचित्र अधिनियम , 1952 ( 1952 का 37 ) की धारा 5 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केंद्र सरकार , श्री सुरेश ए. कराले , ए/ 302 , माध्यम , 139 , महात्मा गांधी मार्ग , गोरेगांव ( डब्ल्यू) , मुंबई-400 062 को, तत्काल प्रभाव से दो वर्षों की अवधि के लिए या अगले आदेश होने तक , इनमें से जो भी पहले घटित हो, केंद्रीय फिल्म प्रमाणन बोर्ड के मुंबई सलाहकार पैनल के सदस्य के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
[फा. सं. 809/7/2009- एफ ( सी ) ] अमिताभ कुमार , निदेशक ( फिल्म) New Delhi , the 20th July , 2010
S.O. 1925. In continuation of this Ministry's Notification of even number , dated 10-11-2009 and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 5 of the Cinematograph Act , 1952 ( 37 of 1952 ) read with rules 7 and 8 of the Cinematograph ( Certification) Rules , 1983 , the Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri Suresh A. Karale , A/ 302 , Maadhyam , 139 , Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Goregaon (W) , Mumbai -400 062 as a member of the Mumbai Advisory Panel of the Central Board of Film Certification with immediate effect for a period of two years or until further orders , whichever is earlier .
[F. No. 809 /7 /2009 - F ( C ) ] AMITABH KUMAR , Director ( Films ) मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय (उच्चतर शिक्षा विभाग ) (राजभाषा प्रभाग )
नई दिल्ली , 13 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1926. केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप - नियम 4 के अनुसरण में , मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय ( उच्चतर शिक्षा विभाग ) के अन्तर्गत मोतीलाल नेहरू राष्ट्रीय प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थान , इलाहाबाद -211004 ( उ. प्र. ) को , ऐसे कार्यालय के रूप में , जिसके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारी वृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है ।
[सं. 11011-1/2010 रा.भा.ए. ] डा. अनिता भटनागर जैन , संयुक्त सचिव 4694
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT (Deptt. of Higher Education)
(O. L. Division ) New Delhi , the 13th July , 2010
S.O. 1926. In pursuance of sub - rule (4) of rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rules , 1976 , the Central Government hereby notifies Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology , Allahabad - 211 004 ( U.P. ) under the Ministry of Human Resource Development , ( Deptt . of Higher Education ) as office , whose more than 80% members of the staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi .
[No. 11011 / 1 /2010 -O.L.U ] Dr. ANITA BHATNAGAR JAIN , Jt . Secy .
युवा कार्यक्रम और खेल मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली , 12 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1927. केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उप - नियम 4 के अनुसरण में , युवा कार्यक्रम और खेल मंत्रालय के स्वायत्तशासी कार्यालय भारतीय खेल प्राधिकरण- नेताजी सुभाष पूर्वी केंद्र , साल्ट लेक सिटी , कोलकाता जिसके 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , अधिसूचित करती है ।
[फा. सं. 11011 / 2/2008 - हि.ए. ]
शैलेश , संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS New Delhi , the 12th July , 2010
S.O. 1927. In pursuance of sub - rule (4) of rule 10 of the Official Language ( Use for Official Purposes of the Union ) Rules , 1976 , the Central Government hereby notifies Sports Authority of India Netaji Subhash Eastern Centre , Salt Lake City , Kolkata an autonomous office of Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports , where of more than 80 % staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi .
[ F. No. 11011 / 2/2008 -H.U . ] SAILESH , Jt . Secy .
उत्तर - पूर्वी क्षेत्र विकास मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली , 26 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1928. राष्ट्रपति , श्री जयदीप कुमार चौधरी को दिनांक 16-07-2010 ( पूर्वाहन ) से उत्तर- पूर्वी क्षेत्र विकास मंत्रालय में तदर्थ आधार पर अनुभाग अधिकारी के पद पर नियुक्त करते हैं ।
[सं. 23/30/2008- प्रशा. ]
अशोलि चलाई , उप सचिव
[ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] MINISTRY OF DEVELOPMENT OF NORTH EASTERN REGION
New Delhi , the 26th July, 2010
S.O. 1928. The President is pleased to appoint Shri Jaydip Kumar Choudhury as Section Officer , on ad- hoc basis in the Ministry of Development of North Eastern Regionwith effect from 16-07-2010 ( forenoon).
[No. 23 / 30/2008 -Admn. ] ASHOLI CHALAI , Dy . Secy .
नई दिल्ली , 29 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1929.- राष्ट्रपति, श्री एस. के. नय्यर को दिनांक 27-07-2010 ( पूर्वाहन ) से उत्तर - पूर्वी क्षेत्र विकास मंत्रालय में नियमित आधार पर निदेशक के पद पर नियुक्त करते हैं ।
[सं. 2/5/2005 - प्रशा. ]
अशोलि चलाई , उप सचिव New Delhi , the 29th July , 2010
S.O. 1929. The President is pleased to appoint Shri S. K. Nayyar as Director on regular basis in the Ministry of Development of North Eastern Region with effect from the forenoon of 27-07-2010 .
[No. 2 / 5 /2005 - Admn . ] ASHOLI CHALAI , Dy . Secy.
विद्युत मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली , 26 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1930.-विद्युत अधिनियम , 2003 ( 2003 का 36 ) की धारा 162 की उपधारा ( 1 ) , 17-08-2006 को अधिसूचित मुख्य वैद्युत निरीक्षक और वैद्युत निरीक्षक की अर्हता , शक्तियाँ तथा कार्य नियमावली , 2006 के साथ पठित , के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केंद्र सरकार एतद्वारा श्री विश्वेश्वर दयाल , उप महाप्रबंधक, दिल्ली मैट्रो रेल कारपोरेशन को , तीन वर्ष की अवधि अथवा श्री विश्वेश्वर दयाल द्वारा दिल्ली मैट्रो रेल कारपोरेशन से उप - महाप्रबंधक पद का कार्यभार छोड़ने पर , जो भी पहले हो , के लिए दिल्ली मास रैपिड ट्रांजिट सिस्टम , ( दिल्ली एमआरटीएस ) के बिजली निरीक्षक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।
उपर्युक्त अधिकारी , दिल्ली मास रैपिड ट्रांजिट सिस्टम के क्षेत्र में बिजली संबंधी कार्यों, बिजली संस्थानों और प्रचालनरत वैद्युत रोलिंग स्टॉक के संबंध में अपनी शक्तियों का प्रयोग करेंगे तथा अपने दायित्वों का निर्वहन करेंगे । तथापि , डीएमआरसी यह सुनिश्चित करेगा कि वह डीएमआरसी में उप महाप्रबंधक के रूप में उन्हें सौंपे गए कार्यों के संबंध में बिजली निरीक्षक नहीं होंगे ।
बिजली निरीक्षक के रूप में नियुक्त व्यक्ति केंद्र सरकार द्वारा इस प्रयोजन हेतु आवश्यक माना जाने वाला प्रशिक्षण लेगा और यह प्रशिक्षण सरकार की संतुष्टि के स्तर तक पूरा किया जाएगा ।
[फा. सं . 42/3/2010- आर एंड आर ]
आई.सी.पी. केशरी , संयुक्त सचिव 4695
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7, 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
MINISTRY OF POWER
New Delhi , the 26th July , 2010 .
S.O. 1930. - In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 162 of the Electricity Act , 2003 (36 of2003) read with Qualifications , powers and functions of Chief Electrical Inspector and Electrical Inspectors Rules 2006 notified on 17-8-2006 the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Vishweshar Dayal , Deputy General Manager , Delhi Metro Rail Corporation as Electrical Inspector for Delhi Mass Rapid Transit System ( Delhi MRTS ) , for a period of three years or demitting charge of the post of Deputy General Manager by Shri Vishweshar Dayal from Delhi Metro Rail Corporation , whichever is earlier .
The above mentioned official shall exercise the powers and perform functions in respect of electrical works , electrical institutions and electrical rolling stock in operation within the area of Delhi Mass Rapid Transit System . However , DMRC will ensure that he will not be Electrical Inspector in respect of the work assigned to him as Deputy General Manager in the DMRC .
The person appointed as Electrical Inspector shall undergo such training as the Central Government may consider it necessary for the purpose and such training shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Government .
[F. No. 42/3 /2010 - R& R ] I.C.P. KESHARI , Jt . Secy .
इस्पात मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली , 23 जुलाई , 2010 का.आ. 1931. केंद्रीय सरकार , पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइप लाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण में झारखंड राज्य में टाटा स्टील लिमिटेड के आयरन ओर स्लरी पाइपलाइन प्रोजेक्ट के संबंध में नीचे दी गई तालिका के स्तंभ ( 2 ) में उल्लिखित प्राधिकारी को उक्त तालिका के स्तंभ ( 3 ) में तत्संबंधी प्रविष्टि में विनिर्दिष्ट क्षेत्रों में उक्त अधिनियम के तहत सक्षम प्राधिकारी के रूप में कार्य करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।
तालिका
प्राधिकारी
क्षेत्रीय अधिकार क्षेत्र क्रम सं.
(3) (2)
( 1)
1.
झारखंड राज्य में पूर्वी सिंहभूमजिला जिला भूमि अर्जन अधिकारी , उपायुक्त का कार्यालय , पूर्वी सिंहभूम , जमशेदपुर , जिला
पूर्वी सिंहभूम , पिन नं. 831001
झारखंड राज्य में सरॉयकेला -राजखार्स- 2. जिला भूमि अर्जन अधिकारी , उपायुक्त का कार्यालय , सरॉयकेला ,
(2)
(3) (1)
वान जिला खार्सवान , सरॉयकेला, जिला सरॉयकेला खार्सवान पिन नं. 833119
3.
झारखंड राज्य में पश्चिमीसिंहभूम जिला
जिला भूमि अर्जन अधिकारी , उपायुक्त का कार्यालय , पश्चिम सिंहभूम , चायबासा , जिला पश्चिम सिंहभूम, पिन नं. 833201
[फा. सं. 11 ( 12 ) /2009- आई डी विंग ]
यू. पी . सिंह , संयुक्त सचिव MINISTRY OF STEEL
New Delhi , the 23rd July , 2010
S.O. 1931. In pursuance of clause (a) of section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby authorises the authorities mentioned in column (2) of the following Table to perform the func- tions of the competent authority under the said Act , in the area specified in the corresponding entry in column (3 ) of the said table , in connection with iron ore slurry pipeline project of Tata Steel Limited , in the State of Jharkhand , namely:-
TABLE
S. No.
Authority
Territorial jurisdiction
(3)
(1)
(2)
East Singbhum District in the State ofJharkhand 1. District Land Acquisition Officer , O/ o Deputy Commissioner , East Singbhum , Jamshedpur , District East Singbhum , PIN 831001
Saraikela- Raj Kharswan District in the State of Jharkhand 2. District Land Acquisition Officer , O/ o Deputy Commissioner , Saraikela Kharswan , Saraikela , District Saraikela , PIN 833119
West Singbhum District in the State ofJharkhand 3. District Land Acquisition Officer , O/ o Deputy Commissioner , West Singbhum Chaibasa , District West Singbhum , PIN 833201
[ F. No. 11 ( 12 )/2009 - IDW]
U. P. SINGH , Jt . Secy .
4696
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
[ PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय
( उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )
भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो
नई दिल्ली , 21 जुलाई , 2010
का. आ. 1932.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम 1988 के नियम 4 के उपनियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं :--
अनुसूची
क्रम लाइसेंस
लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता सं. संख्या
स्वीकृत करने की तिथि वर्ष/माह
(2)
(4)
(1 )
(3)
1. 6922379 04-04-2009 महरज्वेलरी , मेईन रोड, वेगरा , मलप्पुरम , केरल -676304 2. 6922480 06-04-2009 कल्याण ज्वेलर्स , सेलम प्रा. लि. टीसी 37/ 848-16 , ईस्ट फोर्ट , तिरुवनंतपुरम , केरल -695023
3. 6922581 06-04-2009 नवरत्नाज्वेलर्स , कोडुमण पी. ओ. , पत्तनतिट्टा , केरल -691555 4. 6922682 06-04-2009 स्वप्ना ज्वेलरी प्रा. लि. , शोप नं . 541/ I/XII , सिटी सेन्टर कॉम्प्लेक्स , नीर्त नडा, तृश्शूर , केरल 5. 6922985 09-04-2009 मयूरा गोल्ड सुपर मार्कर्ट , कोलाषि पी. ओ. , तृश्शूर केरल-680010
6. 6923078 09-04-2009 पनक्काविलाज्वेलर्स, पी. एम. सी. XIII / 63 , मुन्सिपल शोप्पिंग कोम्लक्स पुनलूर , कोल्लम , केरल 7. 6923381 15-04-2009 यू टेक मिनरल्स एण्ड बीवरेजस , iv/636 , मस्जिदरोड , एरुमतला पी . ओ. , आलुवा , एर्णाकुलम , केरल -683112 8. 6925284 20-04-2009 वीजे मिनरल्स, सर्वे नं. 615/4 , कावश्शेरी , आलत्तूर , पालक्काड , केरल -678543
भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक
भा मा सं.भाग वर्ष
अनु भाग
( 8 ) ( 9 )
(6) ( 7 )
(5)
1999
आई.एस -
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
1999
आई.एस -
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण /शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
आई . एस - 1999
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
1999
आई.एस -
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
आई.एस - 1999
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
1999
आई.एस -
1417
स्स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
2004
आई.एस -
14543
पैकेजबन्द पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )
2004
आई.एस -
14543
पैकेजबन्द पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
( 2)
(1)
(3)
(4)
9. 6925385 08-04-2009 इडिमण्णिक्कल ज्वेलरी , वाषपल्ली पी.ओ. , चडनाश्शेरी , कोट्टयम , केरल-686103 10. 6925486 21-04-2009 श्री पद्मबालाजी स्टील्स प्रा . लि. , 308/1 , मेनोनपारा रोड , न्यू इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , कंजिक्कोड , पालक्काड , केरल -678621 11. 6926690 27-04-2009 एस एस इंडस्ट्रीस , नियर वलियन्नूर, विलेज आफिस , वलियन्त्रूर , पोस्ट वरम , कण्णूर , केरल -670594 12. 6928189 30-04-2009 दीपाज्वेलरी , सी पी VII/430 , ओपेसिट बस स्टेण्ड, चेरुवत्तूर , कासरगोड, केरल-671313
13. 6928492 01-05-2009 टेक्नोफ्लेक्स केबिल्स , ( 1) प्राईवेट लिमिटेड , इंडस्ट्रियल डेवलेप्मेन्ट एरिया , एडयार , मुप्पतडम पी . ओ. आलुवा, एर्णाकुलम केरल-683110 14. 6929292 05-05-2009 राजधानी गोल्ड, सूपर मार्केट , मेईन रोड , काञङाड , कासरगोड केरल-671315 05-05-2009
15. 6929393
न्यूफैषन ज्वेलर्स, राजू भवन , तेम्कुंपुरम; पुत्तूर पी. ओ. , कोल्लम , केरल-691507
16. 6929494 05-05-2009 महाराजा ज्वेलर्स , एषुपुत्रा ग्राम पंचायत , IX/248 एरमल्लूर पी . ओ. , चेर्त्तला , आलप्पुषा केरल -688537
17. 6929595 28-04-2009 सण्लाइट बोर्ड्स , प्राईवेट लिमिटेड , मिल रोड , पी.ओ. बलियापटम , कण्णूर , केरल -670010
4697
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
(5)
( 6) ( 7 ) ( 8 ) ( 9 )
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एंव मुहरांकन-
1992
आई एस-
2830
सामान्य संरचना इस्पात में , पुनर्वेल्लन के लिए कार्बन ढलवाँ इस्पात बिलेट इंगट बिलेट , ब्लूम और स्लैब
आई एस- 2000
4985
पेय जल की पूर्ति के लिए , असुघाटियत पी वी सी पाइप
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण /शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एंव मुहरांकन-
आई एस-
1990
694
1100 वोल्ट तक की, कार्यकारी वोल्टता के लिए पी वी सी रोधित केबल
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एंव मुहरांकन-
आई एस-
1999
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एंव मुहरांकन-
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एंव मुहरांकन
आई एस- भाग 1 1999
2202
लकडी के सपाट दरवाजे के शटर ( ठोस कोर प्रकार ) भाग 1 प्लाईवुड के सतह युक्त पल्ले 4698
[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
(5)
(4)
( 7 ) ( 8 ) ( 9 ) (3)
(6)
(1) ( 2)
1999 05-05-2009
आई एस- 18. 6929696
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एंव मुहरांकन-
सुल्ताना ज्वेलर्स, मेईन रोड, पेरिंगत्तूर , कण्णूर, केरल-670675
1999 19. 6929797 05-05-2009
आई एस- 1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एंव मुहरांकन-
स्वर्णांजली गोल्ड, तलश्शेरी रोड , नादापुरम , वर्कला , ( वया ) कोषिक्कोड , कोषिक्कोड , केरल-673504
1989 6929902 28-04-2009
20.
आई एस- 303
सामान्य प्रयोजनों के लिए , प्लैवुड-
फीनिक्सप्लैवुड्स, तुरुत्ति वयल , पी. ओ. पापिनिश्शेरी , कण्णूर , केरल -670561
2004 21. 6930580 21-04-2009
आई एस- 14543
पैकेजबंद पेय जल , (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा ) -
वैली ड्रोप्स, नोर्त कोत्राकृषि, वया चालक्कुडी, चालक्कुडी , त्रशूर केरल-680721
1999
आई एस- 22. 6930883 05-05-2009
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण /शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एंव मुहरांकन-
राजको फैषन ज्वेल्स , मेईन रोड , नेय्याटिंकरा , तिरुवंनतपुरम , केरल -695121
1999 23. 6930984 05-05-2009
आई एस- 1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एंव मुहरांकन-
मालियेक्कलज्वेलरी , मेईन रोड , मालियेक्कल शेप्पिंग , कोम्प्लेक्स, नोर्त परुर , एर्णाकुलम , केरल
24. 6931077 05-05-2009
1999
आई एस- 1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एंव मुहरांकन-
राधाज्वेलरी , तलिपरंबिल बिल्डिंग , एडत्वा, आलप्पी केरल
1999 25. 6931582 04-05-2009
आई एस-
2202 भाग । फीनिक्सप्लैवुड्स, तुरुत्ति वयल , पी . ओ. पापिनिश्शेरी , कण्णूर, केरल-670561
लकडी के सपाट दरवाजे के शटर ( ठोस कोर प्रकार ) भाग 1 प्लाईवुड के सतह युक्त पल्ले
1988 26. 6931784 11-05-2009
आई एस- 3419
सख्त अधातु नलिकाओं के लिएफिटिंग
शेड नं. 5 , III/90 मिनी इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , कूट्टम्पेरुर पी.ओ. , मान्नार , आलप्पुषा , केरल-689623 स्पिन् टेक फिटिंग्स, इंडिया प्रा. लि. , 4699 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 7, 2010/श्रावण 16 , 1932
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1) ( 2)
( 7) (8 ) ( 9 )
(6) 27. 6931885 29-04-2009
1999
आई एस-
2202 एम. एस. वुड इंडस्ट्रीस , पी. ओ. काञिरंगाड, ( वया) करिम्ब, तलिपरंबा , कण्णूर , केरल-670142
लकडी के सपाट दरवाजे के शटर ( ठोस कोर प्रकार) भाग 1 प्लाईवुड के सतह युक्त पल्ले
1989 28. 6932180 28-04-2009
आई एस-
303
सामान्य प्रयोजनों के लिए प्लैवुड
कुत्रत्तान वुड प्रोडक्ट्स, VI/318 , सर्वे नं. 352/7 , 352/6 , 352/2 , ब्लोक नं. 14 , असमत्रूर पी. ओ. , ओडक्काली, एर्णाकुलम , केरल -683549
1999 29. 6932281 27-04-2009
आई एस-
2202 भाग 1
लकडी के सपाट दरवाजे के शटर ( ठोस कोर प्रकार ) भाग 1 प्लाईवुड के सतह युक्त पल्ले
कुत्रत्तान वुड प्रोडक्ट्स, VI/318 , सर्वे नं. 352/7 , 352/6 , 352/2 , ब्लोक नं. 14, असमत्रूर पी . ओ. , ओडक्काली , एर्णाकुलम, केरल-683549
30. 6932584 13-05-2009
1999
आई एस- 1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
चुंगतज्वेलरी, नियर रामदास थियेटर , एम.जी. रोड, तृश्शूर, केरल-680001
31. 6932685 07-05-2009
1999
आई एस- 1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
ग्लोबलज्वेलर्स , कुट्टिसाहिब बिल्डिंग , चेबर रोड , ब्रोड्वे , कोच्ची, एर्णाकुलम, केरल-682031
1999
आई एस- 32. 6934689 19-05-2009
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
श्री अयप्पा ज्वेलरी , वर्क्स, पुतियकाव , किलिमानूर पी.ओ. , तिरुवन्तपुरम , केरल-695601
1999 33. 6934790 19-05-2009
आई एस- 1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
सण्णीडायमण्ड्स, 40/9134, बी ई सी , मालियेक्कल शोप्पिग राजाजी रोड , कोच्चीन , एर्णाकुलम , केरल-682035
1999
आईएस- 34. 6935792 25-05-2009
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
पवित्राज्वेलरी , मेइन रोड,चेरुपुषा, ( वया ) पय्यत्रूर, कण्णूर , केरल -670511
1999 35. 6936693 25-05-2009
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
अरीना गोल्ड सूक, एम. पी. XIV/621 , तोत्रक्कल पी. ओ. , मंगलापुरम जंडषन , तिरुवनंतपुरम केरल-695317
2904 GI /2010-3 4700
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16, 1932
(2) (3)
(4)
15. 6936794 25-05-2009 मलनाड गोल्ड , के. पी. 3/845 . मेन रोड, कोडुवल्ली, कोषिक्कोड , केरल 37. 693789701-06-2009 बीपात कास्टिंग्स प्र. लि. , VIII/ 715 , जी व एच,, निडा, कंजिवकोड , पालक्काड , केरल -678621 38. 6938192 26-05-2009 गोल्डन मोल्डिंग्स, 7/539 मांरटूटपडी , कायलियाड , शोर्पूर , पालक्काड केरल-679122 39. 6939602 08-06-2009 आशियाना पाईप्स, ईस्टकोटूर , चरिबा पो. ओ. , मलप्पुरम, केरल -676504 40 6040482 26-05-2009 एस . एस. फैषन जवेलरी , त्रिक्कोदिल रोड , चालिक्कावटम, वेत्रला पी. ओ. , कोचीन एर्णाकुलम, केरल-682028 41 6940684 02-06-2009 माडेंक आर.के. लैटक्स , प्राईवेट लिमिटेड, बिल्डिंग नं. ।।/8 वार्ड 22 , तंपलक्काड पी . ओ. काञिरपल्ली , कोट्टयम केरल -680506 42. 6941080 11-06-2009 स्वीकार ज्वेलरी, कुत्रमंगलब पी. ओ. , 43. 6941181 11-06-2009
मण्णकांड, पालक्काड , केरल-678582 44. 6941282 11-06-2009 पार्शियन ज्वेलरी, पीवीसी शोष्टिंग आर्केड , वी. के. रोड, निलंबूर , मलप्पुरम करल-679329
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] (5)
(6) ( 7 ) ( 8 ) ( 9 )
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एंव मुहरांकन
आई एस-
1985
1786
कंक्रीट प्रबलन के लिए, उच्च शक्ति विरुपित इस्पात सरिए एंव तार
1987
आई एस-
7834
भाग 1
जल आपूर्ति के लिए , विलायक सीमेंट जोड सहित इंजेक्शन संचकित पीवीसी फिटिंग: भाग सामान्य अपेक्षाऐं
1995
आई एस-
4984
पेय जल की आपूर्ति के लिए उच्च घनत्व वाले पालिएथिलीन पाईप
आई एस-
1999
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस-
1981
5430
अमोनिया में परिरक्षित प्राकृतिक रबड लैटक्स एवं मुहरांकन
1999
आई एस
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी-शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस-
1999
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7, 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
(4)
(2) (3)
(1)
45. 6941383 11-06-2009 रामसण्स फैषन ज्वेलरी , मेइन रोड , तिरुविल्वामला पी . ओ. , तृश्शूर, केरल -680588 11-06-2009
46. 6941484
रामचंद्रन्स नीलकंठन ज्वेलरी , स्वदेशी शोप्पिंग कोम्प्लेक्स, बैंक रोड, कण्णूर , केरल-670001
47. 6941888 09-06-2009 लक्षमी ज्वेलरी , मेइन रोड, चित्रक्कडा, कोल्लम , केरल-691001
15-06-2009
48. 6942284
रोयल फोल्ड, मलबार शोप्पिंग माल , 'मेले पट्टांबी जंडषन पट्टाबी पोस्ट, पालक्काड , केरल-679303
6942385 02-06-2009
49.
प्रीमियम फेरो अलाय्स लिमिटेड , VI/565- एफ , इंडस्ट्रियल डेवलेप्मेन्ट एरिया , एडयार, बिनानीपुरम , आल्वे , एर्णाकुलम , केरल -683502 6942486 15-06-2009
50.
मिनी फैषन ज्वेलरी , V/876 , एफ , पैलस रोड मट्टांचेरी , कोच्ची , एर्णाकुलम , केरल -682002
15-06-2009
51. 6942587
प्रिन्सज्वेलरी , टी.सी. नं. 37/856 , राजधानी बिल्डिंग , ईस्टफोर्ट , तिरुवनंतपरम , केरल -695023
52. 6943185 16-06-2009 मास्कोम स्टील ( इंडिया ) प्रा. लि. , नियर इंडस्ट्रियल डेवलेपमेन्ट एरिया , एरुमत्तला पी. ओ. आलुवा , एर्णाकुलम , केरल-683105
6944894 16-06-2009
53.
अंबुजा सीमेंट्स लिमिटेड , बिहाइंड क्यू- । बर्त , मट्टांचेरी वार्फ , विलिंगटन आईलैंड , कोचीन , एर्णाकुलम , केरल-682003
(6
(5)
आई
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण /शिल्पकारी-शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
आईस
141
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
आई
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण /शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
आई
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
आई इस -
2831
अल्प तन्यता के संरचनात्मक इस्पात में पुनर्वेल्लन के लिए कार्बन ढलवां इस्पात बिलेट , इंगट , बिलेट , ब्लूम , और स्लैब
1999
आई एल-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण /शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
1985
आई एस-
1786
कंक्रीट प्रबलन के लिए उच्च शक्ति विरुपित इस्पात सरिए एंव तार
1991
आई एस-
1489
भाग ।
पोर्टलैंड पोजोलाना सिमेंट भाग , उडन राख आधारित 4702
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVAΝΑ 16 , 1932
( 2)
(1)
(3)
(4)
10-06-2009
54. 6945088
बीटा हेल्त केयर प्रोडक्ट्स प्रा. लि. , प्लोट न. 21 बी , कोचीन स्पेशियल, इकणोमिक जोण , काक्कनाड , एर्णाकुलम , केरल -682 037 55. 6945189 22-06-2009 बीपात कास्टिंग्स प्रा. लि. , VIII/ 715 , जी व एच , निडा, कंजिक्कोड, पालक्काड , केरल-678 621 56. 6945290 22-06-2009 कोचिन सिमन्ट्सलि. न्यूसप्रिन्ट नगर , वेल्लूर , मेवेल्लूर पी . ओ. कोट्टयम , केरल -686 609 57. 6946393 30-06-2009 ट्राको केबिल कं. लि. , चुमात्रा पी. ओ. तिरुवल्ला, पत्तनमतिट्टा केरल-689 103
58. 6948094 03-07-2009 तेक्किनेटत्त परवूर ज्वेलरी , V , 323 , मुन्सिपल टैक्सी कम शोप्पिंग कोम्प्लेक्स, मेइन रोड , नोर्त परवूर , एर्णाकुलम , केरल -683 513 59. 6948195 07-07-2009 मंजली ज्वेलर्स , बसीलिक्का बिल्डिंग , नियर न्यूचर्च, तृश्शूर, केरल -680 001
60. 6948296 03-07-2009 एन. टी. एमज्वेलरी , पंडिक्काड रोड , मंजेरी , भलप्पुरम केरल -676 12:
61. 6950283 13-07-2009 अक्ष्यज्वेलर्स 7/687 , मेलेपालथम रोड , कोषिक्कोड, केरल -673 001
62. 6950788 13-07-2009 न्यूकेरला ट्रेडर्स , ओडक्काली , असमन्नूर पी. ओ. , पेरुम्पावर , एर्णाकुलम , केरल -683 549
[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] (5)
( 6) ( 7 ) ( 8 ) ( 9 )
1989 चीरा फाडी के लिए रबड के दस्ताने
आई एस- 4148
2006
आई एस- 2062
सामान्य संरचनात्मक प्रयोजनों के लिए इस्पात
43 ग्रेड साधारण पोर्टलैंट, सिमेन्ट
1090 1100 वोल्ट तक की कार्यकारी वोल्टता के पी.वी.सी. रोधित केबल
1999
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस- 1999
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एंव मुहरांकन
आई एस- 1999
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एंव मुहरांकन
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
1989
आई एस-
303
सामान्य प्रयोजन के लिए प्लैवुड 4703 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
(6)
(4)
(5)
(8) (9) (3)
(1) (2)
2004 13-07-2009
आई एस- 63. 6951689
14543
पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )
माथर वाटर , टेक्नोलजीस व बोटिलिंग प्लैंट , एस एफ नं .641/16/2 , 17/2 , 641/12/2 , 3/2 , 2/2 , 2/2 , 640/7 , 641 /16-30 तिरुकोविल्वट्टम विलेज , कण्णन्नल्लूर पोस्ट,
कोल्लम , केरल-691 576
1999
आई एस- 6952085 20-07-2009
64.
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण /शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
कासरगोड अट्लस ज्वेलरी , 425/11 ए , एन . ए. दुरिस्ट होम बिल्डिंग , नियर न्यू बस स्टैण्ड, एम. जी. रोड , कासरगोड, केरल-670 112
1999 20-07-2009
आई एस- 65. 6952186
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
कृष्णा गोल्ड सूक, कुट्टिप्पुरम रोड, वलांचेरी , मलप्पुरम , केरल -676 552
1999 20-07-2009
आई एस- 66. 6952287
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
पवित्रा ज्वेलरी , डोर नं. XIX/ 1292 ओपोसिट गल्स हाई स्कूल , ए. एम. रोड, पेरुंबावूर , एर्णाकुलम , केरल-683 542
1999
आई एस- 20-07-2009
67. 6952388
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
केलमंगलम ज्वेलर्स , एम. सी. रोड, चिंगवनम , कोट्टयम, केरल -686 531
1999 20-07-2009
आई एस- 68. 6952489
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
कल्याण फैषन ज्वेलर्स , मेईन रोड , काट्टाक्कडा, तिरुवनन्तपुरम , केरल
1999
आई एस- 69. 6952590 20-07-2009
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण /शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
लीलाज्वेलर्स , वेस्टगेट, अंबलप्पूषा पी. ओ. , आलाप्पुषा , केरल -688 561
1999 20-07-2009
आई एस- 70. 6952691
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
एम. के. फैषन ज्वेलरी , के. पी. IX/783 वट्टपारा पी . ओ. , तिरुवनन्तपुरम, केरल -695 028 4704
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
(3)
(4)
(1) (2)
20-07-2009
71. 6952792
वी. वी. गोल्क, एस बी पी VI 96 यू पी. के. कोम्प्लेक्स , मेईन रोड , सुल्तान बत्तेरी , वयनाड , केरल-673 592 72. 6953390 14-07-2009 लोयल फुड एण्ड, बीवरेज कं. 4/513 , इंडस्ट्रियल डेवलेप्मेन्ट एरिया , एरुमत्तला पी. ओ. , आलुवा , एर्णाकुलम , केरल -683 112 73. 6954190 20-07-2009 हरिश्रीज्वेलरी , वर्णम पी. ओ. , पुत्तनंगाडी, चेर्त्तला , आलप्पुषा, केरल -688 555 74. 6956905 03-08-2009 बी- वैव इंडिया प्रोडक्ट्स, के पी 4/536 बी , चालियम पी. ओ. , कोषिक्कोड , केरल-673 301 75. 6957297 04-08-2009 इंदिरा ज्वेलर्स, पुलमन पी. ओ. , कोट्टारक्करा , कोल्लम , केरल -691 531 76. 6957301 04-08-2009 जी. एस. पै एण्ड कं. , डोर नं. VI/1153 , मार्केट रोड, आलुवा, एर्णाकुलम , केरल -683 101 77. 6958808 10-08-2009 तूबाज्वेलर्स , चेम्माड , मलप्पुरम , केरल -676 306 78. 6958909 09-08-2009 नक्षत्राज्वेलर्स , डोर नं . XXIII/ 2013/405 मलबार प्लाजा , मट्टत्रूर पी. ओ. , कत्रूर , केरल -670 702 79. 6959002 10-08-2009 कंठत्तिल फाषन ज्वेलर्स , एट्टुमानूर , एर्णाकुलम मेइन रोड , करुप्पन्त्रा , कोट्टयम , केरल -686 603
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii )]
(6)
(5)
(7) (8) (9)
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
2004
आई एस-
14543
पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस-
1997
11536
शिशुओं के लिए प्रसंस्कृत , अनाज आधारित अनुपूरक आहार
आई एस-
1999
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
1999
आईएस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण / शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
(4)
(1) (2)
(3)
10-08-2009
6959103
80.
तृश्शूरगोल्ट सेन्टर , आल्तरा , कोडुवायुर पी. ओ. , पालक्काड, केरल
10-08-2009
81. 6959204
के. पि. चाक्को व सन्स , काक्कनाट्ट ज्वेलर्स , ओलियाप्पुरम शोप्पिंग , कोम्प्लेक्स, पी. ओ. जंगषन कोतमंगलम , एर्णाकुलम , केरल
09-08-2009
82. 6959305
न्यूभीमा फैषन ज्वेलर्स , के पी 11/875 जे , बैपास जंगषन , कषक्कूट्टम पोस्ट, तिरुवनन्तपुरम केरल
11-08-2009
83. 6959406
नेक्टर बीवरेजस , एडवट्टम , करुवेलिल पी. ओ . , एषुकोण , कोल्लम , केरल -691505
13-08-2009
84. 6959911
अतिरा गोल्ड सिटि प्रा. लि. , फोर्ट रोड , नियर के. एस. आर. टी. सी. बस सटैण्ड , नोर्त परवूर , एर्णाकुलम, केरल -683513
13-08-2009
85. 6960084
जोयालुक्कासज्वेलरी , ईस्टफोर्ट, तिरुवनन्तपुरम, केरल
86. 6960286 13-08-2009 मडत्तिपरम्पिल ज्वेलरी , वीजेस कोम्प्लेक्स, बै पास जंगषन , पालारिवट्टम , कोचिन, एर्णाकुलम , केरल -682025
18-08-2009
87. 6961995
श्रीपुरम ज्वेलरी , टी. सी. 39/72 ( II ) चालै , चालै पी. ओ. , तिरुवनन्तपुरम , केरल -695036
18-08-2009
88. 6962088
कारेत्त फाषन ज्वेलरी , के. के. रोड , कुमली , इडुक्की, केरल -685509
4705
(6) (7) (8) (9) (5)
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
1999
आई एस- 1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण /शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
2004
आई एस-
14543
पैकेजबंद पेय जल , ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
1999
आईएस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण /शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण /शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण / शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन 4706
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVAΝΑ 16 , 1932
(3)
(4)
(1)
19-08-2009
89. 6962290
सोनाज्वेलरी , वडश्शेरिक्करा पी. ओ. , पत्तनमतिट्टा , केरल -689662 90. 6962896 21-08-2009 काविल इंडस्ट्रीस , सर्वे नं. 198/16 , करवारम , चिरयिन्कीष तालूक , तिरुवनन्तपुरम , केरल-695102 91. 6963292 19-08-2009 पीसीप्लैवुड्स , 1hih-MCY; W/636 , कीरियाड्, चिरक्कल पी.ओ. कण्णूर , केरल -670011 92. 6963393 19-08-2009 पीसीप्लैवुड्स , सी. पी. डब्ल्यू V/ 636 , कीरियाड्, चिरक्कल पी.ओ. कण्णूर , केरल -670011 93. 6964803 28-08-2009 एवरग्रीन बीवरेजस , 398/2, कल्पकांचेरी विलेज , कल्लिगल, कणंनल्लूर पोस्ट, मलप्पुरम , केरल-676551 94. 6965502 01-09-2009 ख्वमार फाषन गोल्ड , प्रा. लि. गोल्डन आकेड , बिल्डिंग , रुम. नं. के. एम. सी. III , 183 बी. 52 , 53 , 54, 55 न्यू बस स्टान्ट, कासरगोड, केरल -671121 01-09-2009
95. 6965603
कंण्ठत्तिल ज्वेलरी , मेइन रोड , तलयोलपरम्पु, कोट्टयम , केरल
01-09-2009
96. 6965704
वटक्केत्तलाज्वेलरी , वटनाप्पल्लि. पी. ओ. , तृश्शूर, केरल -680614 97. 6965805 27-08-2009 ए. पी. स्टील री- रोल्लिंग, मिल लिमिटेड , VIII / 635 , फेस 1 , न्यू इंडस्ट्रियल डेवलेप्मेन्ट एरिया , मेनोनपारा
[ PART 11 - SEC.3 ( ii ) ] (5)
(8) (9)
(6) (7)
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण /शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
2004
आई एस-
14543
पैकेजबंद पेय जल ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )
ब्लोक बोर्ड
2004
आई एस- 1659
1989
आई एस- 303
सामान्य प्योजनों के लिए प्लैवुड
2004
आई एस- 14543
पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)
1999
आई एस- 1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण /शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
1999
आई एस- 1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
1999
आई एस- 1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण /शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
1985
आई एस- 1786
कंक्रीट प्रबलन के लिए उच्च शक्ति विरुपित इस्पात सरिए एवं तार 4707 भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
(9)
(5)
(3)
(4)
(1)
रोड, कंजिक्कोड पी. ओ. पालक्काड, केरल-678 621
1992 6965906 26-08-2009
आई एस- 98.
2830 ए. पी . स्टील री -रोल्लिंग मिल लिमिटेड, VIII/635 ,. फेस I निडा, मेनोनपारा रोड, कंजिक्कोड पी.ओ. पालक्कड, केरल-678 621
सामान्य सरंचना इस्पात में पुनर्वेल्लन के लिए कार्बन ढलवाँ इस्पात बिलेट , इंगट , बिलेट , ब्लूम और स्लैब
1999
आई एस- 99. 6966201 01-09-2009
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
मोहनाज्वेलर्स , अय्यप्पा चेम्बर्स , मिच्चेल जंगषन , केरल-690 101 मावेलिक्करा , आलप्पुषा ,
1999
आई एस- 01-09-2009
100. 6966302
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
मन्नाडियारज्वेलरी , 11/1422, मार्केट रोड, सिटी पोस्टआफीस , पालक्काड, केरल-678014
1999
आई एस- 01-09-2009
6966403
101.
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
तंक्कमालिकाज्वेलर्स, डोर नं. टी. सी. 1195 /X/ 150 मुत्रुति, तृशूर केरल-680651
1999
आई एस- 6966504 01-09-2009
102.
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
मुद्राज्वेलरी , आलत्तरा , कोडुवायूर पी. ओ. पालक्काड , केरल-678 501
1999
आई एस- 6967910 08-09-2009
103.
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
फात्तिमाज्वेलरी , मेईन रोड, अलनल्लूर पी.ओ. पालक्काड, केरल-678 601
1999
आई एस- 6968003 08-09-2009
104.
1417 जी.डी.एम. गोल्ड रुम नंबर: 10
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
तुन्णत्तिल कुञ्चुकृष्णपिल्लें मेम्मोरियल षोप्पिंग कोम्पलेक्स, कायमकुलम , आलप्पुषा , केरल-690 502
2004
आई एस- 09-09-2009
6968306
105.
14543
पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)
सुर्या इन्णस्ट्रीस , पेप्पारा डाम , विधुरा , नेडुमन्त्राङ् तिरुवनन्तपुरम केरल -695 551
2904 GI/2010-4 4708
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
(2)
(4)
(1)
(3)
6969005 10-09-2009
106.
सुरभी इसपाट प्रा. लि. न्यूइंडस्ट्रियल डवलपमेन्ट एरिया , कंजिक्कोड , पालक्काड , केरल-678 621
107 6970592 15-09-2009 बीपात कास्टिंगंज प्रा.लि. VIII / 715 , जी एंड एच. निडा, कंजिक्कोड , पालक्काड , केरल -678 621
108. 6970693 16-09-2009 पेरियार वुड्ड प्रोडक्टस , तुरुति रोड , चुन्गम, पाप्पिनेशेरी , कण्णूर , केरल-670 561
109. 6970996 17-09-2009 जोस्को ज्वेलर्स प्रा. लि. फैन सेंटर , टी. बी. रोड , पालक्काड केरल -678 002 6971089 17-09-2009
110.
कलनगरा , ज्वलरी मारट्, इडत्तुरा पोस्ट , आलप्पुषा, केरल-689 573
6971190 17-09-2009
111.
रहा ज्वेलरी , डोर नं. पी.पी XIII /177 , पोरुर पोस्ट, मलप्पुरम , केरल-679 339 112. 6973804 25-09-2009 ऐशर्या बिवरेजस कंपनी , चुमात्रा पी.ओ. , तिरुवल्ला, पत्तनमतिट्टा, केरल -689 103
113. 6975303 05-10-2009 महालक्षमी होंम अपलैन्स, नं. X1/ 274 सी. , उरुम्पनाकुन्न , अल्लूर , कल्लेद्रुमेक्करा , तृशूर , केरल -680 683 114. 6976103 06-10-2009 वेल्लियप्पल्लिल ज्वेलेर्स , टी.बी. रोड , पाला , कोट्टयम, केरल-686 575
115. 6976204 06-10-2009 तंकम ज्वेलर्स , हेड पोस्ट आफिस जंगशन , मार्केट रोड , चेगंन्नूर , आलप्पुषा , केरल --689 121
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
(6) (7) (8) (9) (5)
1992
आई एस-
2830
सामान्य सरंचना इस्पात में पुनर्वेल्लन के लिए कार्बन ढलवाँ इस्पात बिलेट इंगट , बिलेट , ब्लूम और स्लैब
1992
आई एस-
2830
सामान्य सरंचना इस्पात में पुनर्वेललन के लिए कार्बन ढलवाँ इस्पात बिलेट इंगट , बिलेट , ब्लूम और स्लैब
1989
आई एस-
303
सामान्यप्योजनों के लिए प्लैवुड
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
2004
आई एस-
14543
पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )
2006
आईएस-
घरेलू प्रेशर कुक्कर
2347
आई एस-
1999
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण /शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
आई एस-
1999
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन- भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
(4)
(2)
(1)
(3)
06-10-2009
6976305
116.
मनप्पुरम ज्वेलर्स प्रा.लि. , 154 ए. , मनप्पुरम हौस, वलप्पाट , तूशूर , केरल -680 567 6978410 14-10-2009
117.
लावन्याज्वेलरी , मैइन रोड, वारापुषा , एर्णाकुलम , केरल -683 517 14-10-2009
118. 6978511
कुन्नत ज्वेलरी , 5/642/के, कुत्रत्तु टवेर्स , ए. सी. रोड, आलप्पुषा , केरल-688 524 14-10-2009
119. 6978612
जोयालुवकास ज्वेलेरी , पालस रोड, तृशूर , केरल -680 001 14-10-2009
6978713
120.
श्रीलक्क्षमी ज्वेलरी , बी.जे. आर्केट , एम.सी. रोड , वय्षपल्ली , मुडवूर पी.ओ. मूवाटुपुषा एर्णाकुलम, केरल -686 669 6979210 19-10-2009
121.
जी. एस. एइ एंड सणर्स , 40/3030 , ब्रोडवे कोचिन , एर्णाकुलम , केरल-682 031 6981803 29-10-2009
122.
सिलवरलैन मिनरलस प्रा. लि. IV/832 ऐ. डी. ए. कंज्जीक्कोड ( वेस्ट) , पालक्काट, केरल -678 623 6983096 31-10-2009
123.
चित्रन सणर्स ज्वलेर्स, V/ 26 ए , मेइन रोड , नेन्मारा , पालक्काट , केरल -678 508 6983197 31-10-2009
124.
दुबाईगोल्ड स्कोयर् डोर नं. 4/904 इरनहोली , कोम्पलेक्स , तंकलास रोड. कोन्णोटी , मलप्पुरम , केरल (5)
(7) (8) (9)
(6)
आ
14 "
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
आई एस
141
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
1900
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
1999
आई एस-
14
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण /शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस- 1999
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
आई एस-
1999
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं , आभूषण/ शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन
2004
आईएस-
14543
पैकेजबंद पेय जल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा )
1999
आईएस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण/शिल्पकारी- शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
1999
आई एस-
1417
स्वर्ण एवं स्वर्ण मिश्रधातुएं, आभूषण /शिल्पकारी - शुद्धता एवं मुहरांकन-
[ सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 11 ] सी. के . महेश्वरी , वैज्ञानिक " जी " ( प्रमाणन ) 4710
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION (Department of Consumer Affairs)
BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS
New Delhi , the 21st July , 2010
S.O. 1932. In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulations 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following Schedule :
SCHEDULE
Sl . Licences Grant Date
Title of the Standard
IS No. Part Sec . Year No.
No.
Name & address of the Party
(3)
(4)
(1) (2)
(5)
(9)
(7) (8) 1. 6922379 4-4-2009
IS1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts Fineness and marking
Mahar Jewellery MainRoad Vengara Malappuram Kerala 676 304
2. 6922480 6-4-2009
1999
Gold and gold alloys, jewellery/ artefacts Fineness and markiny
Kalyan Jewellers Salem Pvt . Ltd. TC 37/ 848-16 East Fort Trivandrum Kerala 695 023
3. 6922581 6-4-2009
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Navaratna Jewellers Kodumon P.Ο. Pathanamthitta Kerala 691 555
4. 6922682 6-4-2009
IS1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Swapna Jewellery Pvt . Ltd. Shop No. 541 / I / XII City Centre Complex North Nada Thrissur Kerala
5. 6922985 9-4-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
MayooraGold Super Market KolazhyP.O . Thrissur Kerala 680 010
6. 6923078 9-4-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Panackavila Jewellers PMC XIII / 63 Municipal Shopping Complex Punalur Kollam Kerala
7. 6923381 15-4-2009
IS 14543-
2004
Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)
U Tech . Minerals and Beverages IV/ 636 Masjid Road Erumathala P.O. , Edathala Aluva Ernakulam Kerala 683 112
8. 6925284 20-4-2009
IS 14543
2004
Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)
Vijay Minerals Sy . No. 615/4 Kavassery Alathur Palakkad Kerala 678 543
9. 6925385 8-4-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Edimannickal Jewellery Vazhapally P.O. Changanacherry Kottayam Kerala 686 103 भारत का राजनत्र अगस्त 7, 2010 / श्रावण 16 , 1932
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
(1)
(3)
(4)
10. 6925486 21-4-2009
Sri Padmabalaji Steels Pvt. Ltd. 308/1 , Menon Para Road New Industrial Development Area Kanjikode Palakkad Kerala 678 621 11. 6926690 27-4-2009
S S Industries Near Valiyannur Village Office Valiyannur Post Varam Kannur Kerala 670 594 12. 6928189 30-4-2009 Deepa Jewellery CP VII/ 430 Opp . Bus Stand Cheruvathur Kasaragod Kerala 671313 13. 6928492 1-5-2009
Technoflex Cables ( 1 ) Pvt . Ltd. Industrial Development Area Edayar, Mupathadam P.O. Aluva Ernakulam Kerala 683 110 14. 6929292 5-5-2009
Rajadhani Gold Super Market Main Road Kanhangad Kasaragod Kerala 671 315 15. 6929393 5-5-2009
New Fashion Jewellers Raju Bhavan Thekkumpuram Puthoor P.O. Kollam Kerala 691 507 6929494 5-5-2009
16.
Maharaja Jewellers Ezhupunna Grama Panchayat IX 248 , Eramalloor P.O. Cherthala Alappuzha Kerala 688 537 28-4-2009
17. 6929595
Sunlight Boards ( P) Ltd. Mill Road P.O.Baliapatam Kannur Kerala 670 010 5-5-2009
18. 6929696
Sulthana Jewellers MainRoad Peringathoor Kannur Kerala 670 675 19. 6929797 5-5-2009
Swarnanjali Gold Thalassery Road Nadapuram Verkala ( VIA) Kozhikode Kozhikode Kerala 673 504 20. 6929902 28-4-2009
Phoenix Plywoods Thuruthi Vayal P.O. Pappinisseri Pappinisseri Kannur Kerala 670 561
4711
(9) (5)
(6) (7) (8)
1992
IS 2830
Carbon steel cast billet ignots , billets , blooms and slabs for re- rolling into steel for general structural purposes
2000
IS 4985
Unplasticized pvc pipes for potable water supplies
IS 1417
1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
1990
IS694
Pvc insulated cables for working voltage upto and including 1100 v
1999
IS 1417
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
1999
IS 1417
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
IS 1417
1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Part 1 1999
IS 2202
Wooden flush door shutters (solid core type ) : part 1 plywood face panels
IS 1417
1999 Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
1999
IS 1417
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
1989
IS 303
Plywood for general purposes 4712
[ PART II ---SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVAΝΑ 16 , 1932
(3)
(2)
(5)
(6)
(8 ) (9) (4)
(1)
( 7)
IS 14543 21. 6930580 21-4-2009
2004
Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)
Valley Drops North Konnakuzhi Via- Chalakudi Thrissur Kerala 680 721
22. 6930883 5-5-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- fineness and marking
Rajco Fashion Jewels MainRoad Neyyattinkara Thiruvananthpuram Kerala 695 121
23. 6930984 5-5-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Maliekal Jewellery Main Road Maliekal Shopping Complex North Parur Ernakulam Kerala
24. 6931077 5-5-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Radha Jewellery Thaliparampil Building Edathua Dist Alleppy Kerala
25. 6931582 4-5-2009
Part
IS 2202
1 1999
Wooden flush door shutters (solid core type ) : part 1 plywood face panels
Phoenix Plywoods Thuruthi Vayal P.O. Pappinisseri Pappinesseri Kannur Kerala 670 561
26. 6931784 11-5-2009
1988
IS 3419
Fittings for rigid non- metalic conduits
SpinTech Fittings India P. Ltd. Shed No.5 , 111/90 , Mini Industrial Estate Kuttemperoor P. O. Mannar Alappuzha Kerala 689623
27. 6931885 29-4-2009
Part 1 1999
IS 2202
Wooden flush door shutters (solid core type) : part 1 plywoodface panels
MS Wood Industries P.O. Kanhirangad (VIA) Karimbam Taliparamba Kannur Kerala 670 142
28. 6932180 28-4-2009
1989
Plywood for general purposes IS 303 Kunnathan Wood products VI/ 318 , Survey No. 352/7 , 352/6 , 352/2 Block No. 14 , Asamanoor P.O. Odakkali Ernakulam Kerala 683 549
29. 6932281 27-4-2009
IS 2202 Part 1 1999
Wooden flush door shutters (solid core type) : part 1 plywood face panels
Kunnathan Wood Products VI/318 , Survey No. 352/7 , 352/ 6,352/ 2 Asamanoor P.O. Odakkali Ernakulam Kerala 683 549
IS 1417 30. 6932584 13-5-2009
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Chunghath Jewellery Near Ramdas Theatre M.G. Road Thrissur Kerala 680001
7-5-2009
31. 6932685
IS 1417 Part 1 1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Global Jewellers Kuttisahib Building Chamber Road Broadway Kochi Ernakulam Kerala 682 031 4713 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
(9)
(5)
(6) (7) (8) (3)
(4)
(1) (2)
1999
IS 1417 32. 6934689 19-5-2009
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- Fineness and marking
Sree Ayyappa Jewellery Works Puthiyakavu Kilimanoor P.O. Thiruvananthpuram Kerala 695 601
IS 1417
1999 19-5-2009
33. 6934790
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Sunny Diamonds 40/9134 , BEC Rajaji Road Cochin Ernakulam Kerala 682 035
IS 1417
1999 25-5-2009
34. 6935792
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- Fineness and marking
Pavithra Jewellery MainRoad Cherupuzha ( Via ) Payyannur Kannur Kerala 670 511
IS 1417
1999 25-5-2009
35. 6936693
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Arena Gold Souk M.P. XIV - 621 Thonnakkal P.O. Mangalapuram Junction Thiruvananthpuram Kerala 695 317
1999
IS 1417 6936794 25-5-2009
36.
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Maland Gold Κ.Ρ. 3/845 Main Road Koduvally Kozhikode Kerala
IS 1786
1985 1-6-2009
37. 6937897
High strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement
Beepath Castings Pvt . Ltd. VIII/ 715 , G & H Nida Kanjikode Palakkad Kerala 678 621
Part 1 1987 26-5-2009
38. 6938192
IS 7834 GoldenMouldings 7/559 Mampattapadi Kayiliad shornur Palakkad Kerala 679 122
Injection moulded pvc fittings with solvent cement joints for water supplies : part I general requirements
IS 4984
1995 6939602 8-6-2009
39.
High density polyethylene pipes for potable water supplies
Ashiyana Pipes East Kodur Chattipparamba (P.O. ) Malappuram Kerala 676 504
IS 1417
1999 40. 6940482 26-5-2009
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
S.S. Fashion Jewellery Trikkovil Road Chalikkavattom Vennala P.O. Cochin Ernakulam Kerala 682 028
IS 5430
1981 41, 6940684 2-6-2009
Ammonia preserved concentrated natural rubber latex
Mardec R.K. Latex Pvt . Ltd. Building No. 11 / 8A, Ward 22 Thampalakkad P.O. Kanjirappally Kottayam Kerala 686 506
1999
IS 1417 42. 6941080 11-6-2009
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Sweekar Jewellery Kunnamangalam P.O. Kozhikode DT Kerala 673 571 4714
[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/SHRAVANA 16, 1932
(3)
(4)
(2)
(5)
(1 )
(6) (7) (8) (9 ) 43. 6941181 11-6-2009
IS 1417
1999 R.S. Jewellery Main Road Mannarkkad Palakkad Kerala 678 582
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
44. 6941282 11-6-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- Fineness and marking
Persian Jewellery Peewees Shopping Arcade V.K.Road, Nilambur Malappuram Kerala 679 329
45. 6941383 11-6-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Ramasons Fashion Jewellery Main Road Thiruvilwamala (P.O.) Thrissur Kerala 680 588
6941484 11-6-2009
46.
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Ramchandaran Neelakandan Jewellery Swadeshi Shopping Complex Bank Road Kannur Kerala 670 001
47. 6941888 9-6-2009
IS 1417
1999 Lakshmi Jewellery Main Road Chinnakkada Kollam Kerala 691001
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
48. 6942284 15-6-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
RoyalFold Malabar Shopping Mall Mele Pattambi Junction Pattambi Post Palakkad Kerala 679 303
49. 6942385 2-6-2009
2001
IS 2831
Carbon steel cast billet ignots , billets , blooms and slabs for re - rolling into tenfile structural steel
Premium Ferro Alloys Ltd. VI/ 565F, Industrial Develop- ment Area Edayar Binanipuram Alwaye Ernakulam Kerala 683 502
50. 6942486 15-6-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Mini Fashion Jewellery V/ 876 F Palace Road Mattancherry Kochi , Ernakulam Kerala 682 002
51. 6942587 15-6-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Prince Jewellery T.C. No. 37/856 Rajdhani Building East Fort Thiruvananthpuram Kerala 695 023
52. 6943185 16-6-2009
1985
IS 1786
High strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement
Mascom Steel ( India) Pvt . Ltd. Near Industrial Development Area Erumathala P.O. Aluva Ernakulam Kerala 683 105
53. 6944894 16-6-2009
IS 1489 Part 1 : 1991
Portland pozzolana cement part 1flyash based
Ambuja Cement Limited Behind Q- 1 , Berth Mattan- cherry Wharf Willingdon Island Cochin , Ernakulam Kerala 682 003 4715 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
(5)
(9)
(8) (1)
1989
IS4148 54. 6945088 10-6-2009
Surgical rubber gloves
Beta Healthcare Products Private Limited Plot No. 21 - B Cochin Special Economic Zone Kakkanad , Ernakulam Kerala 682 037
2006
IS2062 55. 6945189 22-6-2009
Steel for general structural purposes
Beepath Castings Private Ltd. VIII/715 , G & H Nida Kanjikode Palakkad Kerala 678 621
1989
IS8112 56. 6945290 22-6-2009
43 grade ordinary portland cement
Cochin Cements Limited Newsprint Nagar Velloor Mevelloor P.O. Kottayam Kerala 686 609
1990
IS694 30-6-2009
57. 6946393
Pvc insulated cables for working voltages upto and including 1100 v
Traco Cable Co. Limited Chumathra P.O. Thiruvalla Pathanamthitta Kerala 689 103
1999
IS 1417 58. 6948094 3-7-2009
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Thekkinedath Paravur Jewellery V, 323 Municipal Taxi - cum Shopping Complex Main Road North Paravoor Ernakulam Kerala 683 513
IS 1417
1999 59. 6948195 7-7-2009
Gold and gold alloys , Fineness and marking jewellery / artefacts-
Manjaly Jewellers Church Thrissur Basilica Building Near New Kerala 680 001
IS 1417
1999 60. 6948296 3-7-2009
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- Fineness and marking
N.T.M. Jewellery Pandikkad Road Manjeri Malappuram Kerala 676 121
1939
IS 1417 13-7-2009
61. 6950283
Akshaya Jewellers 7/687 , Male Palayam Road Kozhikode Kerala 673 001
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/artefacts- Fineness and marking
1989 13-7-2009
62. 6950788
IS 303
Plywood for general purposes
New Kerala Traders Odakkali Asamanoor P.O. Perumbavoor Ernakulam Kerala 683 549
2004
IS 14543 13-7-2009
63. 6951689
Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)
Mather Water Technologies &Botling Plant Sf. No. 641/16/2, 17/2, 641/ 12/2 , 3/2 , 2/2,2,2/2 , 640/7 , 641/16-30 Thrikkovilvattom Village Kannnalloor Post Kollam Kerala 691 576
1999
IS 1417 64. 6952085 20-7-2009
Gold and gold alloys . jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Kasargod Atlas Jewellery 425 / 11A N.A. Tourist Home Bldg. Near New Bus Stand M.G. Road Kasaragod Kerala 670 112
2904 G1/2010-5 4716
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
[ PART 11 Sec. 3 ( ii) ] ( 1) (2)
(4)
(7) ( 8) (9) (3)
(5)
(6)
20-7-2009
IS 1417
1000 65. 6952186
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery / artefacts- Fineness and marking
Krishna Gold Souk Kuttippuram Road Valancherry P.O. Malappuram Kerala 676 522
6952287 20-7-2009
IS 1417
1999 66.
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Pavithra Jewellery Door No. XIX / 1292 Opp . GirlsHigh School A.M. Road Perumbavoor Ernakulam Kerala 683 542
20-7-2009
IS 1417
1999 67. 6952388
Kelamanglam Jewellery M.C. Road Chingavanam Kottayam Kerala 686 531
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
6952489 20-7-2009
1999 68.
IS 1417 Kalyan Fashion Jewellers Main Road Kattakada Thiruvananthpuram Kerala
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery / artefacts- Fineness and marking
20-7-2009
69. 6952590
IS 1417
1000 Leela Jewellers West Gata Ambalapuza P.O. Alappuza Kerala 688 561
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
20-7-2009
70. 6952691
IS 1417
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
M.K. Fashion Jewellery K.P. IX/ 783 Vattappara P.O. Thiruvananthpuram Kerala 695 028
71. 6952792 20-7-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery / artefacts- Fineness and marking
V. V. Gold SBP VI 96U , P.K. Complex , Main Road Sulthan Bathery Wayanad Kerala 673 592
72. 6953390 14-7-2009
IS 14543
2004
Packaged drinking water ( Other than packaged natural mineral water )
Loyal Food & BeveragesCo. 4/513, Industrial Development Area Erumathala P.O. Aluva, Ernakulam Kerala 683112
73. 6954190 20-7-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys . jewellery / artefacts- Fineness and marking
Harisree Jewellery Varnam P.O. Puthnangadi Cherthala Alappuzha Kerala 688 555
74. 6956905 3-8-2009
IS 11536
1997 B -Vive ! da Proicts KP4/ 536 Bayam P.O. Kozhikode Kerala 673 301
Processed cereal based complementary foods for infants
750-7297 4-8-2009
1999
IS 1417 Pulamon P.O Kottarakkara Kollam Kerala 691 531 Indira Jewellers
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
76. 6957301 4-8-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
G. S. Pai & Co. Door No. VI/ 1153 Market Road Aluva Ernakulam Kerala 683 101
77 6958808 10-8-2009
IS 1417
1999 Thooba Jewellery Chemmad Malappuran Kerala 676 306
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking 4717 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
(9)
(6)
(5)
(7) ( 8 ) (1) (2)
(3)
1999
IS 1417 9-8-2009
78. 6958909
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery / artefacts- Fineness and marking
Nakshatra Jewellers Door No. XXIII / 2013 /405 Malabar Plaza Mattannur P.O. Kannur , Kerala - 670 702
1999
IS 1417 79. 6959002 10-8-2009
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Kandathil Fashion Jewellers Ettumanoor Ernakulam Main Road Kuruppanthra Kottayam Kerala - 686 603
1990
IS 1417 80. 6959103 10-8-2009
Thrissur Gold Centre Althra Koduvayur P.O. Palakkad Kerala
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
1999
IS 1417 10-8-2009
81. 6959204
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
K.P. Chacko & Sons Kakkanattu Jewellers Oliyappuram Shopping Complex P.O. Junction Kothamangalam Ernakulam Kerala
IS 1417
1999 6959305 9-8-2009
82.
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
New Bhima Fashion Jewellers KP II / 875 J Bypass Junction Kazhakkuttom Post Thiruvananthpuram Kerala
2004
IS 14543 6959406 11-8-2009
83.
Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)
Nectar Beverages Edavattom Karuvelil P.O. Ezhukone Kollam Kerala -691505
1999
IS 1417 84. 6959911 13-8-2009
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery / artefacts- Fineness and marking
Athira Gold City Pvt . Ltd. Fort Road Near KSRTC Bus Stand North Parur Ernakulam Kerala -683 513
1999
IS 1417 6960084 13-8-2009
85.
Joyalukkas Jewellery East Fort Thiruvananthpuram Kerala
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
1999
IS 1417 86. 6960286 13-8-2009
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Madathi Parambil Jewellery Veeges Complex Bye - pass Junction Palarivattom Cochin Ernakulam Kerala -682 025
1999
IS 1417 87. 6961995 18-8-2009
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery / artefacts- Fineness and marking
Sripuram Jewellery T.C. 39/72 ( II ) Chalai Chali P.O. Thiruvananthpuram Kerala - 695 036
1999
IS 1417 18-8-2009
88. 6962088
Kareth Fashion Jewellery K. K. Road Kumily Idukki Kerala - 685 509
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
1999
IS 1417 19-8-2009
89. 6962290
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery / artefacts- Fineness and marking
Sona Jewellery Vadasserikara P.O. Pathanamthitta Kerala -689 662 4718
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
[ PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii) ] (3)
(4)
(5)
(1) (2)
(9)
(6)
(8 )
(7) 21-8-2009
IS 14543 90. 6962896
2004
Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)
Kavil Industries Survey No. 198/16 Kara- varam Chiryainkil Taluk Thiruvananthpuram Kerala - 695 102
91. 6963292 19-8-2009
Block boards
IS 1659
2004 Peecee Plywoods CPW V / 636 , Keeriyad Chirakkal P.O. Kannur Kerala - 670011
92. 6963393 19-8-2009
1989
Plywood for general purposes IS 303 PeeceePlywoods CPW V / 636 , Keeriyad Chirakkal P.O. Kannur Kerala -670011
93. 6964803 28-8-2009
IS 14543
2004
Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)
Evergreen Beverages 398/2 Kalpakanchery Village Kallingal Kannanalloor PostMalappuram Kerala- 676551
94. 6965502 1-9-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Qamar Fashion Gold Pvt . Ltd. GoldenArcade Building Room No. KMC III 183 B 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 New Bus Stand Kasaragod Kerala -671 121
95. 6965603 1-9-2009
IS 1417
1999 Kandathil Jewellery MainRoad Thalayolaparambu Kottayam Kerala
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
96. 6965704 1-9-2009
IS 1417
1999 Vadakethala Jewellery Vatanappally P.O. Thrissur Kerala -680614
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
97. 6965805 27-8-2009
IS 1786
1985
High strength deformed steel bars and wiresfor concrete reinforcement
A.P. Steel Re- rolling Mills Ltd. VIII/ 635 , Phase I New Industrial Development Area Menonpara Road Kanjikode (P.O. ) Palakkad Kerala -678 621
98. 6965906 26-8-2009
1992
IS2830 A.P. Steel Re - rolling Mills Ltd. VIII/635 , Phase I NIDA , Menonpara Road Kanjikode Palakkad Kerala - 678 621
Carbon steel cast billet ignots , billets , blooms and slabs for re -rolling into steel for general structural purposes
99. 6966201 1-9-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery / artefacts- Fineness and marking
Mohana Jewellers Ayyappa Chambers Mitchel Junction Mavelikara Alappuzha Kerala - 690 101
100. 6966302 1-9-2009
IS 1417
1999
jewellery/ artefacts- Gold and gold alloys , Fineness and marking
Mannadiar Jewellery 11/1422 , Market Road City PostOffice Palakkad Kerala -678014
101. 6966403 1-9-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Thankamalika Jewellers Door No. T.C. 1195 /X/ 150 Mannuthy Thirssur Kerala -680 651 4719 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
(9)
(6) (7) (8) (3)
(5)
(4)
(1) (2)
IS 1417
1999 6966504 1-9-2009
102.
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Mudra Jewellery Althara Koduvayur PostOffice Palakkad Kerala-678 501
1999
IS 1417 6967910 8-9-2009
103.
Fathima Jewellery MainRoad Alanallur P.O. Palakkad Kerala - 678 601
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
IS 1417
1999 6968003 8-9-2009
104.
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
G.D.M. Gold Room No. 10 , Thundathil Kunjukrishna Pillai Memorial Shopping Complex Kayamkulam Alappuzha Kerala-690 502
2004
IS 14543 105. 6968306 9-9-2009
Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water )
Surya Industries Peppara Dam P.O. Vithura Nedumangad Thiruvananthpuram Kerala -695 551
1992 10-9-2009
6969005
106.
IS 2830 Surbhi Ispat Pvt . Ltd. New Indl . Development Area Kanjikode Palakkad Kerala - 678 621
Carbon steel cast billet ignots , billets , blooms and slabs for re - rolling into steel for general structural purposes
1992 6970592 15-9-2009
107.
Beepath Castings Private Ltd. VIII / 715 , G & H Nida Kanjikode Palakkad Kerala -678 621
Carbon steel cast billet ignots , IS2830 billets, blooms and slabs for re - rolling into steel for general structural purposes
1989 6970693 16-9-2009
108.
Plywood for general purposes IS 303 Periyar Wood Products Thuruthi Road Chungam Pappinisseri Kannur Kerala -670 561
IS 1417
1999 6970996 17-9-2009
109.
Josco Jewellers Pvt . Ltd. Fine Centre T.B. Road Palakkad Kerala - 678 002
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
IS 1417
1999 6971089 17-9-2009
110.
Kalangara Jewellery Mart Edathua Post Alappuzha Kerala - 689 573
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
1999
IS 1417 6971190 17-9-2009
111.
Gold and gold alloys , jellery/artefacts- Fineness and marking
Raha Jewellery Door No. P.P. XIII / 177 P.O. Porur Malappuram Kerala-679 339
2004
IS 14543 6973804 25-9-2009
112.
Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)
Aiswarya Beverages Co. Chumathra P.O. Thiruvalla Pathanamthitta Kerala - 689 103
2006
IS 2347 6975303 5-10-2009
113.
Domestic Pressure cookers
Mahalakshmi Home Appliances No. XI/ 274C Urumbankunnu Aloor Kalletumkara Thrissur Kerala - 680 683 4720
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] ( 1) (2)
(4)
(3)
(5)
(9)
(6) (7) (8) 6976103 6-10-2009
114.
IS 1417
1999 Velliappallil Jewellers T.B. Road , Pala Kottayam Kerala -686 575
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
115 6976204 6-10-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Thankam Jewellers Head Post Office Junction Market Road , Chengannur Alappuzha , Kerala - 689 121
116 6976305 6-10-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Manappuram Jewellers Private Limited 154 A , Manappuram House , Valapad Thrissur , Kerala - 680 567
6978410 14-10-2009
117.
IS 1417
1999 Lavanya Jewellery Main Road , Varapuzha , Ernakulam Kerala - 683 517
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
108. 6978511 14-10-2009
IS 1417
Gold and gold alloys , jellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Kunnath Jewellers 5/642 / K , Kunnath Towers , A.C. Road, Alappuzha, Kerala - 688 524
119. 6978612 14-10-2009
IS 1417
1999 Joyajukkas Jewellery Palace Road , Thrissur , Kerala - 680001
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
120. 6978713 14-10-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Sreelakshmi Jewellery B.J. Arcade , M. C. Road, Vazhapilly , Mudavoor P.O. Muvattupuzha Ernakulam Kerala - 686 669
121. 6979210 19-10-2009
IS 1417
1999 G. S. Pai & Sons 40/3030 , Broadway Kochi Ernakulam , Kerala - 682 031
Gold and gold alloys , jellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
122. 6981803 29-10-2009
IS 14543
2004
Packaged drinking water (Other than packaged natural mineral water)
Silverline Minerals ( P) Ltd. IV/ 832 , I.D.A. Kanjikode , (West) Palakkad, Kerala-678623
123. 6983096 31-10-2009
IS 1417
1999 Chinnan Sons Jewellers V/ 26A , Main Road , Nemmara Palakkad Kerala - 678 508
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery / artefacts- Fineness and marking
124. 6983197 31-10-2009
IS 1417
1999
Gold and gold alloys , jewellery/ artefacts- Fineness and marking
Dubai Gold Souge Door No. 4/904 Eranholi Complex Thangals Road , Kondotty Malappuram , Kerala
[No. CMD/ 13 : 11]
C. K. MAHESHWARI , Scientist - G ( Certification) 4721 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010 / श्रावण 16 , 1932
कोयला मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली , 3 अगस्त, 2010
का. आ. 1933.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 200 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार में कोयला मंत्रालय के द्वारा जारी की गई में अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 2867 तारीख 13 अक्तूबर , 2009 जो भारत के राजपत्र भाग II , खंड 3 , उप - खण्ड ( ii ) तारीख 17 अक्तूबर , 2009 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका माप 46.000 हेक्टेयर ( लगभग ) या 113.67 एकड़ ( लगभग ) है कोयले का पूंर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विहित उक्त भूमि के भाग में कोयला अभिप्राप्त है;
अतः केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम 1957 की धारा 7 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 45.996 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 113.66 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप की उक्त भूमि का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ।
टिप्पण 1 : इस अधिसूचना के अधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. एसईसीएल/बीएसपी /जीएम/ ( पीएलजी )/ भूमि/379 , तारीख 24 मार्च , 2010 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर , जिला कोरबा ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काऊंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता --700001 के कार्यालय में या साउथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड , राजस्व अनुभाग , सीपत रोड , बिलासपुर -495006 , छत्तीसगढ़ के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।
टिप्पण 2 : कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है , जिसमें निम्नलिखित उपबंध हैं :-
अर्जन के बाबत आपत्तियां :
" 8 ( 1 ) कोई व्यक्ति , जो किसी भूमि में , जिसकी बाबत धारा 7 के अधीन अधिसूचना निकाली गई है , हितबद्ध है , अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्हीं अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के बारे में आपत्ति कर सकेगा ।
स्पष्टीकरण: -
( 1 ) इस धारा के अन्तर्गत यह आपत्ति नहीं मानी जाएगी कि कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन संक्रियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संक्रियाएं केंद्रीय सरकार या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नहीं करनी चाहिए ।
(2 ) उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन प्रत्येक आपत्ति सक्षम अधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जाएगी और सक्षम अधिकारी , आपत्तिकर्ता को स्वयं सुने जाने , विधि व्यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और रेली सभी आपत्तियों को सुनने के पश्चात् और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जाँच , यदि कोई हो , करने के पश्चात् जो वह आवश्यक समझता है , वह या तो धारा 7 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि का या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़े या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आपत्तियों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट केंद्रीय सरकार को उसके विनिश्चय के लिए देगा ।
( 3 ) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह व्यक्ति भूमि में हितबद्ध समझा जाएगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होगा , यदि भूमि या किसी ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर लिए जाते हैं । " टिप्पण 3 : केंद्रीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काऊंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता -700001 को उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 के अधीन अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 905 , तारीख 20 मार्च , 1987 द्वारा सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियुक्त किया है ।
अनुसूची
सरईपाली खुली खदान ( पहला विस्तार ) कोयला ब्लाक , कोरबा क्षेत्र जिला-कोरबा ( छत्तीसगढ़ )
[ रेखांक संख्या एसईसीएल /बीएसपी /जीएम ( पीएलजी ) / भूमि/379 , तारीख 24 मार्च , 2010 ]
सभी अधिकारः
क्षेत्र हेक्टेयर में
ग्राम संख्या
जिला
टिप्पणियां पटवारी हल्का संख्या
तहसील
क्रम सं. ग्राम का नाम
7
4
5
6
8 1 2
3
पाली
कोरबा
41.277
भाग
66
1.
09
बुडबुड
भाग
68
पाली
4.719
कोरबा
2.
09
राहाडीह
कुल क्षेत्र : 45.996 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 113.66 एकड़ ( लगभग ) 4722
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
[ PARI 11 --- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1. ग्राम बुडबुड ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लॉट संख्या : 1/3 , 1/4 , 2 से 4 , 6 , 7 ( भाग ) , 14 से 22 , 23 ( भाग ) , 27/3 ( भाग ) , 139 ( भाग ) 140/1 ( भाग ) , 140/2 , 165 से 167 , 169 ( भाग ) , 178 ( भाग ) , 179 से 196 , 197 ( भाग ) , 198 से 247 , 251 ( भाग ) , 259 ( भाग ) , 260 ( भाग ) , 261 ( भाग ) , 262 से 264 , 265 ( भाग ) , 380 से 388 , 511 , 512 , 518 से 522 , 532 से 534 , 535 ( भाग ) , 540 ( भाग ) , 617 ( भाग ) , 618 से 620 , 621 ( भाग )
2. ग्राम राहाडीह ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लॉट संख्या : 48 ( भाग ) , 49,66,67 , 68 ( भाग ) , 73 , 74 , 75 ( भाग ) , 76 ( भाग ) , 77/2 , 78 ( भाग ) , 79 ( भाग ) , 81 ( भाग ) , 95 ( भाग ) , 103/7
सीमा वर्णन:
ब्लाक-1
क-ख : रेखा ग्राम बुडबुड में बिन्दु " क " से आरंभ होती है और उसी ग्राम के प्लाट संख्या 165 , 166 के उत्तरी सीमा तथा 140/1 , 139 , 197 , 621 से होकर प्लाट संख्या 619 के पूर्वी सीमा और 621 , 617 से गुजरती हुई प्लाट संख्या 230 , 264 के भागतः पूर्वी सीमा से होकर बिन्दु " ख " पर मिलती है।
ख-क : रेखा ग्राम बुडबुड के प्लाट संख्या 264 के भागतः पूर्वी सीमा तथा 261 , 265 , 260 , 259 से होकर प्लाट संख्या 261 के भागतः दक्षिणी सीमा और 251 से गुजरती हुई प्लाट संख्या 247 के भागतः दक्षिणी सीमा तथा 251 , 178 से होती हुई प्लाट संख्या 180 , 181 , 182 के दक्षिणी सीमा और 169 से गुजरती हुई प्लाट संख्या 167 के दक्षिणी सीमा और 167 , 165 के पश्चिमी सीमा से होती हुई आरंभिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है ।
ब्लाक-2
ग-घ : रेखा ग्राम बुडबुड - ढुकुपथरा की सम्मिलित सीमा में बिन्दु " ग " से आरंभ होती है और ग्राम बुडबुड के प्लाट संख्या 4 , 1/4 , 1/3 के पश्चिमी 1/3 के उत्तरी 1/3 , 3 के पूर्वी सीमा तथा 7 से होकर प्लाट संख्या 15 , 14 के पूर्वी सीमा और 27/3 , 23 से गुजरती हुई प्लाट संख्या 384 , 385 , 388 के उत्तरी और पूर्वी 387 , 386 के पूर्वी 386 के दक्षिणी सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " घ " पर मिलती है । घ- : रेखा ग्राम बुडबुड ढुकुपथरा के भागतः सम्मिलित सीमा से गुजरती हुई आरंभिक बिन्दु " ग " पर मिलती है । ब्लाक-3
इ-च : रेखा ग्राम बुडबुड - तालापार की सम्मिलित सीमा में बिन्दु " ङ " से आरंभ होती है और ग्राम बुडबुड के प्लाट संख्या 518 , 519 के पश्चिमी 519 के उत्तरी , 512 के भागतः दक्षिणी और पश्चिमी सीमा , 511 के भागत पश्चिमी और उत्तरी 512 , 522 , 521 , 532 के उत्तरी और पूर्वी , 532 के दक्षिणी , 534 के पूर्वी , 535 के उत्तरी तथा 540 के उत्तरी और पूर्वी सीमा से होती हुई ग्राम बुडबुड - राहाडीह के सम्मिलित सीमा में बिन्दु " च " पर मिलती है।
च- ङ : रेखा ग्राम बुडबुड के प्लाट संख्या 540 , 535 से होकर ग्राम बुडबुड - तालापार के भागतः सम्मिलित सीमा से होती हुई आरंभिक बिन्दु " ङ " पर मिलती है ।
ब्लाक-4
छज : रेखा ग्राम बुडबुड में बिन्दु " छ " से आरंभ होती है और उसी ग्राम के प्लाट संख्या 620 के उत्तरी और पूर्वी से होती हुई बिन्दु " ज " पर मिलती है ।
ज-छ : रेखा ग्राम बुडबुड के प्लाट संख्या 620 के दक्षिणी और पश्चिमी सीमा से होती हुई आरंभिक बिन्दु " छ " पर मिलती है। ब्लाक -5
रेखा ग्राम बुडबुड- राहाडीह की सम्मिलित सीमा में बिन्दु " झ " से आरंभ होती है और ग्राम राहाडीह के प्लाट संख्या 49 के उत्तरी और पूर्वी 48 के पूर्वी 79 , 78 , 77/2 , 81 , 74 , 66 ,67 ,68 के उत्तरी 95 , 103/7 के पश्चिमी उत्तरी और पूर्वी सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " ज " पर मिलती है ।
: रेखा ग्राम राहाडीह के प्लाट संख्या 103/7 के दक्षिणी सीमा और 95 , 68 से होकर प्लाट संख्या 67 के दक्षिणी सीमा तथा 68 से होती हुई प्लाट संख्या 73 के दक्षिणी सीमा तथा 75 ,76 , 81 से गुजरती हुई प्लाट संख्या 77/2 के दक्षिणी सीमा और 78 , 79 , 48 से होकर प्लाट संख्या 49 के दक्षिगी और पश्चिमी सीमा से गुजरती हुई आरंभिक बिन्दु " झ " पर मिलती है ।
[फा. सं. 43015/20/2009- पी आर आई डब्ल्यू- । ]
एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव
MINISTRY OF COAL
New Delhi , the 3rd August , 2010
S.O. 1933. Whereas , by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal No. S.O. 2867 dated the 13th October , 2009 issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas . ( Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 (20 or 1957 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) and published in the Gazette of India , Part - II , Section 3 , Sub- section ( ii ) dated the 17th October, 2009 , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 46.000 hectares ( approximately) or 113.67 acres ( approximately ) of the lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification:
4723 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
And, whereas , the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands prescribed in the Schedule appended to this notification ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the lands measuring 45.996 hectares ( approximately) or 113.66 acres ( approximately ) as All Rights in or over the said lands described in the Schedule appended hereto ;
Note 1 : The plan bearing number SECL/ BSP / GM ( PLG )/ LAND/ 379 dated the 24th March , 2010 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected at the Office of the Collector , Korba ( Chhattisgarh ) or at the Office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata - 700001 or at the Office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited (Revenue Section ) , Seepat Road , Bilaspur , 495006 ( Chhattisgarh) .
Note. 2: Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of Section 8 of the said Act which provides as follows :
Objection to Acquisition :
"8( 1) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under Section 7 has been issued, may , within thirty days of the issue of the notification , object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or any rights in or over such land .
Explanation:
(1 ) It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operation in the land for the production of coal and that such operation should not be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person .
(2) Every objection under , sub - section ( 1 ) shall be made to the competent authority in writing , and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall , after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry , if any , as he thinks necessary , either makes a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 or of rights in or over such land , or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land , to the Central Government , containing his recommendations on the objections , together with the record of the proceedings held by him, for the decision of the Government .
(3) For the purposes of this section , a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act . " Note3: The Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata - 700001 , has been appointed by the Central Government as the competent authority under Section 3 of the said Act, vide notification number S.O. 905 , dated the 20th March , 1987 , published in Part II , Section . 3 , sub- section ( ii ) of the Gazette of India , dated the 4t April , 1987 .
SCHEDULE
Saraipali OC ( 1st Extension ) Coal Block, Korba Area District- Korba ( Chhattisgarh ) (Planbearing number : SECL/BSP/ GM ( PLG )/ LAND/ 379 dated the 24th March, 2010 ) All Rights :
7
6
4
5
2 3
1
Remarks
Tahsil
District
Area in Hectares
Village Number
S1 . No.
Name of Village
Patwari halka Number
7
8
6
4
5
1
2
3
41.277
Part
66
Pali
Korba
09
1. Budbud
4.719
Part
Pali
Korba
2.
68
Rahadih
09
Total : 45.996 hectares (Approximately ) Or 113.66 acres ( approximately ) 2904 G1/ 2010-6 4724
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 /SHRAVANΝΑ 16, 1932
F -Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] (1) Plot numbers to be acquired in village Budbud (Part) : 1/3 , 1/4 , 2 to 4 , 6 , 7 (P) , 14 to 22 , 23 ( P ), 27/3 ( P ) , 139 (P ) , 140/1 (P) , 140/2 , 165 to 167 , 169( P) , 178(P) , 179 to 196 , 197 (P) , 198 to 247 , 251 ( P ) , 259 (P ) , 260 ( P ) , 261 ( P ), 262 to 264 , 265 (P) , 380 to 388 , 511 , 512 , 518 to 522 , 532 to 534, 535 (P) , 540 (P) , 617 (P) , 618 to 620 , 621 (P) (2) Plot numbers to be acquired in village Rahadih (Part) : 48 (P) , 49 , 66 , 67, 68 ( P ) , 73,74, 75 ( P ) , 76 ( P ) , 77 / 2.78 (P) , 79(P) , 81 (P) , 95 (P ) , 103/7 .
Boundary Description:
Block- 1 :
A- B Line starts from point " A" in village Budbud and passes along the northern boundary of plot number 165, 166 , through 140/1 , 139 , 197 , 621 , eastern boundary of plot number 619, through 621.617 . pally eastern boundary ofplot number 230 , 264 and meets at point "B " .
B-A Line passes in village Budbud along partly eastern boundary of plot number 264 , through 261 , 265 , 260, 259 then along partly southern boundary of plot number 261 through 251 , then along partly southern boundary of plot number 247 , through 251 , 178 , along southern boundary of plot number 180 , 181 , 182 , through 169 , then along southern boundary of plot number 167, western boundary of plet number 167 , 165 and meets at starting point " A" .
Block -2:
C-D Line starts from point " C " on the common boundary of village Budbud - Dhukupathara and passes in village Budbud along western boundary of plot number 4 , 1/4 , 1/3 , northern boundary of plot number 1/3 eastern boundary of plot number 1/3 , 3 , through 7 , eastern boundary of 15 , 14, through 27/3 , 23 . northern and eastern boundary of 384 , 385 , 388 , eastern boundary of 387, 386 southern boundary ofplot number 386 and meets at point " D " ,
DC Line passes along the partly common boundary of villages Budbud - Ohukupathara and meets at starting point"C".
Block - 3:
E-F Line starts from point " E " on the common boundary of villages Budbud - Talapar and passes in village Budbud along western boundary of plot number 518 , 519 , northern boundary of plot 19, partly southern and western boundary of plot number 512 , partly western and northern neary of plot number 511 , northern and eastern boundary of plot number 512 , 522 , 521 , 532 , southern neundary of 532 , eastern boundary of 534 , northern boundary of 535 , northern and eastern boundary of 540 and meets at point ' F ' on the common boundary of villages Budbud - Rahadih .
F- E Line passes in village Budbud through plot number 540 , 535 then along partly con boundary of villages Budbud - Talapar and meets at starting point " E " .
Block - 4:
G-H Line starts from point in village Budbud and passes ato..g northern and eastem, boundary of pion number 620 and mee
H-G Line pases in villag. starting point "G". uthern and western boundary of plot number 62 and meets ai Jock 5:
-) Line starts from points the common boundary of villages Bursb Rahadih along northensand castern boundary of plot number 49 , eastern boundary village Number 48 , northern boundary of pleber 79 , 78 , 77/2 , 81 , 74 , 66 , 67, 68 , western , northern and eastern boundary , ofplot number 95 , 106 . e's at point "J" .
Line passes in villegal rong southern boundary of plot number 103/7 , throughouthern boundary of plot nannt . 47 , through 68 , southern boundary of plot number 73 , through 75, 76 , 81 , southern boundary of 77/2 , dough 78 , 79 , 48 , southern and western boundary of piot number 49 and meets at star ng
[ F. No. 430.5 / 20 / 2009 - PRIW - 1 ]
M. SHAHABUDEEN Under Secy .
4725 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
आदेश
नई दिल्ली , 3 अगस्त , 2010
का. आ. 1934. कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् सक्त नियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 9 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 58 तारीख 15 मार्च , 2010 जो भारत के राजपत्र भाग II , खंड 3 , उप- खण्ड ( ii ) तारीख 20 मार्च , 2010 में प्रकाशित होने पर, उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि और भूमि में या उस पर के सभी अधिकार ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त भूमि कहा गया है ) क्त अधिनियम की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर, आत्यांतिक रुप से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित हो गए और केन्द्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गय । है कि साउथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड बिलासपुर 'जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् नक्त सरकारी कम्पनी कहा गया है। ) ऐसे निबंधनों और शर्तों का , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार इस निमित्त अधिरोपित करना उचित समझे , अनुपालन करन के एलए तैयार है;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, कोयला धारक की अनि और विकास ) अधिनियम 1957 की धारा 11 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदन शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह निदेश देती है कि इस प्रकार 11, हेट उक्त 104.938 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि और उस दर के सी अधिकार तारीख 20 मार्च , 2010 से केन्द्रीय सरकार में इस प्रकार निहित बने रहने के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित निबंधनों और शर्तों के अधीन २ हते हुए , उक्त सरकारी कम्पनी में निहित हो जाएंगे , अर्थात्:
( 1 ) सरकारी कम्पनी, उक्त अधिनियम के उपबंधों के अधीन यथा अवधारित प्रतिकर , ब्याज , नुकसान और वैसी ही मदों की बाबत किए गए सभी संदायों का केन्द्रीय सरकार को प्रतिपूर्ति करेगी ;
(2 ) सरकारी कम्पनी द्वारा शर्त ( 1 ) के अधीन केन्द्रीय सरकार को संदेय रकमों का अवधारण करने के प्रयोजन के लिए एक अधिकरण का गठन किया जाएगा और ऐसे किसी अधिकरण और ऐसे अधिकरण की सहायता करने के लिए नियुक्त व्यक्तियों के संबंधों में उपगत सभी व्यय उक्त कम्पनी द्वारा वहन किए जाएंगे तथा इसी प्रकार निहित उक्तभूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार के लिए या उसके संबंध में जैसे अपील आदि सभी विधिक कार्यवाहियों की बाबत उपगत , सभी व्यय भी , इसी प्रकार उक्त सरकारी कम्पनी द्वारा वहन किए जाएंगे ;
(3 ) सरकारी कम्पनी , केन्द्रीय सरकार या उसके पदाधारियों की ऐसे किसी अन्य व्यय के संबंध में , क्षतिपूर्ति करेगी जो इस प्रकार निहित उक्त भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के बारे में केन्द्रीय सरकार या उसके पदधारियों द्वारा या उनके विरुद्ध किन्हीं कार्यवाहियों के संबंध में आवश्यक हो ;
( 4 ) सरकारी कम्पनी को केन्द्रीय सरकार के पूर्व अनुमोदन के बिना उक्त भूमि और भूमि में या उसके ऊपर इस प्रकार निहित अधिकार को किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को अंतरित करने की शक्ति नहीं होगी ; और
( 5 ) सरकारी कम्पनी ऐसे निदेशों और शर्तों का , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार द्वारा , जब कभी आवश्यक हो, उक्त भूमि के विशिष्ट क्षेत्रों के लिए दिए जाएं या अधिरोपित की जाए, पालन करेंगी।
[फा. सं. 43015 /3 /2007- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू
एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव
ORDER
New Delhi . the 3rd August , 2010
S.O. 1934. Whereas , on the publication of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal , number S.O. 758 dated 15th March , 2010 published in the Gazette of India , Part - II , Section 3 , Sub - section ( ii ) dated the 20th March , 2010 issued under subsection ( 1 ) of section 9 of the Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisition and Development ) Act, 1957 20 of 1957 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the lands as All Rights in or over such land described in the Schedule appended to the said notification ( hereinafter referred to as the said lands ) vested absolutely in the Central Government free from all encumbrances under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 10 of the said Act ;.
And , whereas , the Central Government is satisfied that the Sout !. Castern Coalfields Limited , Bilaspur ( hereinafter referred to as the Government Company ) is willing to comply with such terms and conditions as the Central Government thinks fit to impose in this behalf;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 11 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 , the Central Government hereby directs that the land measuring 104.938 hectares (approximately ) as All Rights in or over the said lands so vested , shall with effect from 20th March, 2010 instead of continuing to so vest in the Central Government , vest in the Government Company , subject to the following terms and Londitions , namely .
4726
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
===
1. the Government Company shall reimburse to the Central Government all payments made in respect of compen- sation , interest , damages and the like , as determined under the provisions of the said Act ;
2. a Tribunal shall be constituted for the purpose of determining the amount payable to the Central Government by the Government Company under condition ( 1 ) and all expenditure incurred in connection with any such tribunal and persons appointed to assist the tribunal , shall be borne by the Government Company and similarly , all expenditure incurred in respect of all legal proceedings like appeals etc. , for or in connection with the rights in or over the said lands , so , vested , shall also be borne by the , Government Company ;
3. the Government Company shall indemnify the Central Government or its officials against any other expenditure that may be necessary in connection with any proceedings by or against the Central Government or its officials , regarding the rights in or over the said lands so vested ;
4. the Government Company shall have no power to transfer the said lands to any other person without the prior approval of the Central Government ; and 5. the Government Company shall abide by such directions and conditions as may be given or imposed by the Central Government for particular areas of the said lands , as and when necessary.
[ F. No. 43015/ 3 / 2007 - PRIW - 1 ]
M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy .
नई दिल्ली , 4 अगस्त, 2010
का. आ. 1935. केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 7 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 3444 तारीख 10 दिसम्बर , 2009 जो भारत के राजपत्र भाग II , खंड 3 , उप- खण्ड ( ii ) तारीख 19 दिसम्बर , 2009 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका मापमान 662.151 हेक्टेयर या 1636.175 एकड़ है उस पर के सभी अधिकारों का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दी है ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार को पूर्वोक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और छत्तीसगढ़ सरकार से पुनः परामर्श करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 662.151 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 1636.175 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि के सभी अधिकार अर्जित किए जाने चाहिएं;
अतः केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 9 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 662.151 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 1636.175 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप वाली भूमि के सभी अधिकार अर्जित किए जाते है ;
इस अधिसूचना के अधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. एसईसीएल /बीएसपी/जीएम/ ( पीएलजी ) / भूमि/377 , तारीख 4 मार्च , 2010 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर , सरगूजा ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काऊंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता -700001 के कार्यालय में या साउथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड , राजस्व अनुभाग, सीपत रोड , बिलासपुर-495006 , छत्तीसगढ़ के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।
अनुसूची
महान III एवं IV ब्लाक , जगन्नाथपुर ओपनकास्ट परियोजना भटगांव क्षेत्र ,
जिला-सरगुजा ( छत्तीसगढ़ )
[रेखांक संख्या एसईसीएल /बीएसपी /जीएम ( पीएलजी ) / भूमि/377 , तारीख 4 मार्च , 2010 ]
सभी अधिकारः
( क ) राजस्व भूमि
क्रम सं. ग्राम का नाम पटवारी हल्का संख्या ग्राम संख्या
4 i
2
3
1.
14
93 जगन्नाथपुर
2.
14
94 पम्पापुर
3. चउरा
07
35 4.
07
परसवारकला
36 तहसील
क्षेत्र हेक्टेयर में
जिला
टिप्पणियां 5
6
7
8
259.680
भाग प्रतापपुर
सरगुजा
भाग
8.040
सरगुजा
प्रतापपुर
253.675
भाग राजपुर
सरगुजा
14.325
भाग राजपुर
सरगुजा
कुल क्षेत्र : 535.720 हेक्टेयर ( लगभग ) या 1323.764 एकड़ ( लगभग ) [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
( ख ) वन भूमि:
ग्राम का नाम पटवारी हल्का संख्या ग्राम संख्या क्रम सं.
1.
14
93 जगन्नाथपुर
14
2.
94 पम्पापुर
07
चउरा
3.
35
07
36 4. परसवारकला
1. ग्राम जगन्नाथपुर ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लॉट संख्या :
4727
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
क्षेत्र हेक्टेयर में टिप्पणियां जिला
तहसील
भाग
63.410
सरगुजा
प्रतापपुर
6.930
भाग प्रतापपुर
सरगुजा
भाग
50.612
सरगुजा
राजपुर
भाग
5.479
राजपुर
सरगुजा
कुल क्षेत्र : 126.431 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 312.411 एकड़ ( लगभग )
कुल योग ( क + ख ) : 535,720 + 126,431-662.151 हेक्टर ( लगभग )
या 1636.175 एकड़ ( लगभग ) 899 से 910, 911 ( भाग ) , 912 से 922, 929 ( भाग ), 930, 931 ( भाग ) , 932, 933 ( भाग ) ; 952 ( भाग ) , 953 ( भाग ) , 955 ( भाग ) , 956 ( भाग ) , 1148 ( भाग ) , 1149 ( भाग ) , 1153 , 1154 ( भाग ) , 1155 से 1462, 1463 ( भाग ) , 1464 से 1555 , 1557 से 1752, 1182/1755 , 1470/1757 , 1475/1758 , 1476/1759 , 1548/1760 2. ग्राम पम्पापुर ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लॉट संख्या :
2से 12 , 13 ( भाग ) , 14 ( भाग ) , 15 से 19 , 72 ( भाग ) , 73 to 76 , 115 ( भाग ) , 116 ( भाग ) , 122 ( भाग )
3. ग्राम चउरा ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लॉट संख्या: 150 ( भाग ) , 173. ( भाग ) , 176 ( भाग ) , 177, 178, 179 ( भाग ) 181 ( भाग ) , 182 ( भाग ) , 183 to 199, 200 ( भाग ) , 201 to 229 , 230 ( भाग ) , 231 ( भाग ) , 232 ( भाग ) , 468 ( भाग ) , 509 ( भाग ) , 687 ( भाग ) , 688 से 877,878 ( भाग ), 879 से 909 , 910 ( भाग ) , 911 (भाग) , 912 ( भाग ) , 913 से923 , 924 ( भाग ) , 927 ( भाग ) , 928 , 929 ( भाग ) , 931 ( भाग ) , 1043 से. 1054 , 1059 से 1061,1063 से 1069,1071 से 1074, 1075 ( भाग )
4. ग्राम परसवारकला ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लॉट संख्या: 01 से 07,08 ( भाग ) , 1357 से 1358, 1359 ( भाग ) , 1363 , 1364 ( भाग ) , 1365 से 1366 , 1367 ( भाग ) , 1368 ( भाग ) , 1500 ( भाग ) सीमा वर्णन :
क-ख : रेखा ग्राम पम्पापुर में बिन्दु " क " से आरंभ होती है और अम्बिकापुर - प्रतापपुर पीडब्ल्यूडी सड़क के पूर्वी किनारे से होती हुई ग्राम जगन्नाथपुर में प्रवेश करती है और उसी सड़क के पूर्वी किनारे होती हुई बिन्दु " ख " पर मिलती है।
ख-ग : रेखा ग्राम जगन्नाथपुर के प्लाट संख्या 913 , 922 के पश्चिमी सीमा से होकर प्लाट संख्या 929 , 933,931 , 952 , 953 , 911 से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " ग " पर मिलती है। ग -घ : रेखा ग्राम जगन्नाथपुर के प्लाट संख्या 1484 , 1485 , 1483 , 1482 , 1481 , 1479/2 , 1480 , 1466 के उत्तरी सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " घ" पर मिलती है।
घ-ङ : रेखा ग्राम जगन्नाथपुर के प्लाट संख्या 1463 , 955 , 956 से होकर प्लाट संख्या 1156 , 1155 , 1153 के पश्चिमी सीमा से होती हुई बिन्दु " ङ " पर मिलती है ।
ङ- च : रेखा ग्राम जगन्नाथपुर के प्लाट संख्या 1153 के उत्तरी सीमा से होकर 1154 से गुजरकर पुनः 1149 , 1169 के उत्तरी सीमा से होकर प्लाट संख्या 1148 से गुजरती है और ग्राम चउरा में प्रवेश करती है और प्लाट संख्या 200 , 181 , 179 , 182 , 179 , 173 , 176 , 200 , 150 से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " च " पर मिलती है। : च- छ रेखा ग्राम चउरा के प्लाट संख्या 150 , 687 , 1075 , 232 , 231 , 230 , 468 से गुजरती है , उसके बाद प्लाट संख्या 509 एवं घोघर नाला के पूर्वी किनारे से होती हुई बिन्दु " छ " पर मिलती है।
छ-ज : रेखा ग्राम चउरा के घोघर नाला के दक्षिणी किनारे से होती हुई बिन्दु " ज " पर मिलती है ।
: ज-झ रेखा ग्राम चउरा के प्लाट संख्या 878 , 931 , 910 , 912 , 911 , 929 , 928 , 927 , 924 से गुजरती हुई ग्राम परसवार कला में प्रवेश करती है और प्लाट संख्या 8 , 1500 से होकर बिन्दु " झ " पर मिलती है ।
झ-क : रेखा ग्राम परसवार कला के प्लाट संख्या 1500 , 3,1500 , 1368 , 1367 , 1364 , 1362 , 1363 , 1359 से होकर होती हुई ग्राम पम्पापुर में प्रवेश करती है , और प्लाट संख्या 125 , 122 , 116 , 115 से होकर प्लाट संख्या 78 , 77 , 70 , 71 , के उत्तरी सीमा से गुजरती है फिर प्लाट संख्या 72 , 13 , 14 से होकर प्लाट संख्या 22 , 21 , 20 के उत्तरी सीमा से होती हुई आरंभिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है।
[फा, सं. 43015/5 / 2009- पी आर आई डब्ल्यू-1 ]
एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव 4728
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANΝΑ 16 , 1932
PARI I SE (0 )
New Delhi , the 4th August , 2010
S.O. 1935. Whereas , by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.0 . 3444 Jated the 10th December , 2009 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the Coal Bearing Arcas ( Acquisition and Development ) Act. 1957 ( 20 of 1957 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in the Gazette of India , Part - Section 3 , Sub -section ( ii ) dated the 19th December , 2009 , the Central Government gave notice of its intention to acquire 662.151 hectares or 1636.175 Acres land as all rights in or over such lands specified in the Schedule appended to that notification;
And whereas , the competent authority in pursuance of Section 8 of the said Act , has made his report to the Central Governament;
And whereas , the Central Government after considering the aforesaid report and after consulting the Govemment of Chhattisgarh , is satisfied that the lands measuring 662.151 hectares ( approximately ) or 1636.175 acres ( approximately all rights in or over such lands as described in the Schedule appended hereto , should be acquired;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub section ( 1 ) of Section 9 of the Coal Bearing At (Acquisition and Development) Act , 1957 the Central Government hereby declares that the land measuring 662.151 hectare.. appic nately ) or 1636.175 acres ( approximately ) as all rights in or over such lands as described in the Schedule are here acquired:
The Plan bearing number SECL / BSP / GM / ( PLG )/ LAND/ 377 dated the 4th March , 2010 of the area covered by nis Hotification may be inspected at the Office of the Collector , Surguja (Chhattisgarh ) or at the Office of the Coal Controller ! Courell House Street , Kolkata 700001 or at the Office of the South Eastern Coalfield Limited ( Revenue Section ) scr Road. Bilaspur - 495006 ( Chhattisgarh ) .
SCHEDULE
MAHAN III & IV BLOCK , JAGANNATHPUR OPEN CAST PROJECT
Bhatgaon Area , District Surguja (Chhattishgarh ) . [Plan bearing number : SECL / BSP / GM ( PLG ) / Land / 377 dated the 4th March , 2010 ]
(All Rights )
A) Revenue Land:
Village Number No.
Name of Village
Patwari halka Number
3
4 2
14
1.
93 Jagannathpur
91
14
Pumpapur
3. Chaura
07
35
07
36 Paraswarkala
Tahsil
District
Remarks
Area in Hectares
5
6
7
8
259.680
Part Surguja
Pratappur
8.040
Part Pratappur Surguja
253.675
Part Surguja
Rajpur
14.325
Part Rajpur
Surguja
Total: 535.720 hectares ( approximately ) or 1323.764 acres ( approximately ( B) Forest Land ( CJJ / BJJ ) :
Village Number Name of Village
St. No.
Patwari halka Number
14
93 1 . Jagannathpur
14
94 Pumpapur
3.
07
35 Chaura
07
36 Pariswarkata
District
Remarks Tahsil
Area in Hectares
63.410
Part Surguja
Pratappur
6.930
Part Surguja
Pratappur
50.612
Part Rajpur Surguja
Part
5.479
Surguja
Rajpur
Total : 126.431 hectares ( approximately ) or 312.411 acres ( approximately) .
Grand Total ( A+ B ) : 535.720 + 126.431 = 662.151 hectares ( approximately ) or 1636.175 acres ( approximately ) .
1. Plet.numbers to be acquired in village JAGANNATHPUR ( Part ) :
199 to 910,911 ( Part ) , 912 to 922 , 929 ( Part ) , 930 , 931 ( Part ) , 932 , 933 ( Part ) ; 952 (Part) , 953 ( Part ) , 955 (Part ) . 1956 ( Part ) , 1148 ( Part ) , 1149 ( Part) , 1153. 1154 ( Part) , 1155 to 1462 , 1463 ( Part ) , 1464 to 1555 , 1557 to 1752 , 1182-17SS 1170/1757,1475 / 1758,1476/ 1759,1548 / 1760 4729 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
2. Plot numbers to be acquired in village PUMPAPUR ( Part ) :
2 to 12 , 13 (Part ), 14( Part ) , 15 to 19, 72 ( Part ) , 73 to 76 , 115 (Part) , 116 ( Part ) , 122 (Part )
3. hot numbers to be acquired in village CHAURA (Part ) : 150 (Part ) , 173 ( Part ), 176 (Part) , 177, 178 , 179 (Part ) 181 (Part ) , 182 (Part ), 183 to 199, 200 ( Part ) , 201 to 229, 230 (Part) , 231 (Part ) , 232 ( Part ) , 468 (Part ) , 509 ( Part ) , 687 ( Part ) , 688 to 877,878 ( Part ) , 879 to 909,910 (Part ) , 911 (Part) , 912 (Part ), 913 to 923 , 924 (Part ) , 927 (Part) , 928 , 929 ( Part) , 931 (Part ) , 1043 to 1054 , 1059 to 1061,1063 to 1069,1071 to 1074,1075 ( Part )
4. Plot numbers to be acquired in village PARASWARKALA (Part) :
01 to 07,08 (Part ) , 1357 to 1358 , 1359 (Part ) , 1363 , 1364 (Part) , 1365 to 1366 ,, 1367 (Part ) , 1368 ( Part ) , 1500 ( Part ) Boundary Description:
A- B : Line starts from Point " A " in village Pumpapur and passes along eastern side of Ambikapur- Pratappur PWD road then enter in village Jagannathpur and passes along eastern side of same road and meet at point "B " .
B - C : Line passes in village Jagannathpur along western boundary of plot no , 913 , 922 , and through plot no 929 , 933,931 , 952 , 953 , 911 and meet at point " C" :
C-D: Line passes in village Jagannathpur along northern boundary of plot no 1484 , 1485 , 1483 , 1482 , 1481 , 1479/2 , 1480 , 1466 , and meet at point " D " .
D- E : Line passes in village Jagannathpur through plot no 1463 , 955 , 956 , then boundary of plot no 1156 , 1155 , 1153 , and meet at point " E" ,
E - F: Line passes in village Jagannathpur along northern boundary of plot no . 1153 , through 1154 , again along northern boundary of 1149 , 1169 , through plot no 1148 then entered in village Chaura and passes through of plot no 200,181,179 , 182 , 179 , 173 , 176 , -200 , 150 and meet at point " F " .
F-G : Line passes in village Chaura through plot no 150, 687 , 1075 , 232 , 231 , 230 , 468 after that the Eastern of plot no 509 eastern bank and Ghoghar Nullah and meet at point " G " ,
G-H : Line passes in village Chaura along south bank of Ghoghar nallah & meet at point " H " .
H- 1: Line passes in village Chaura through plot no 878,931,910,912,911,929,928 , 927,924 , and enter in village Paraswarkala and passes through plot no 8,1500 and meet at point " I " :
I - A : Line passes in village Paraswarkala through plot no 1500, 3 , 1500 , 1368,1367, 1364 , 1362 , 1363 , 1359 , and enter in village Pumpapur and passed through plot no 125 , 122 , 116 , 115 , along northern boundary of plot no 78,77,70 , 71 after that through plot no 72 , 13 , 14 along northern boundary of plot no 22 , 21 , 20 , and meets at starting point "A " .
[ F. No. 43015 /5 / 2009 - P W - I ]
M. SHAHABUI есу.
नई दिल्ली , 5 अगस्त , 2010
का. आ. 1936. केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित भूमि मेंना अधिप्राय किर जाने की संभावना है ;
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 4 की उप - धारा ( १ ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उस भूमि में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ।
इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक संख्या राजस्व/ 02/ 2010 , तारीख 2 जनवरी , 2010 का निरीक्षण महाप्रबंधक ( भूमि और राजस्व ) , दरभंगा हाउस , सेंट्रल कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड , रांची या महाप्रबंधक , राजस्व क्षेत्र या उपायुक्त , लेतेहार और उपायुक्त चतरा , झारखंड के कार्यालय में या मुख्य महाप्रबन्धक ( खोज प्रभाग ) , केन्द्रीय खनन योजना और डिजाईन संस्थान गोंडवाना प्लेस , कांके रोड, रांची के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट कोलकाता के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है।
इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाली भूमि में हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चाटों और अन्य दस्तावेजों का इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित की तारीख से नब्बे दिनों के भीतर भारसाधक अधिकारी या महाप्रबंधक ( भूमि और राजस्व ) , सेंट्रल कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड , रांची को भेजेंगे ।
अनुसूची
कोयद और मनातू ब्लॉक कोल माइनिंग ब्लॉक जिला लातेहार और चतरा ( झारखण्ड ) रेखांक संख्या राजस्व/02/ 2010 तारीख 2 जनवरी , 2010
सभी अधिकारः 4730
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
थाना
थाना/ग्राम सं.
क्रम सं. मौजा/ ग्रा
1
2
3
4 1 . बनालाल
49
बालुमाथ
2.
50 मनातु
बालुमाथ
3. बनवार
51
बालुमाथ
4. सोपरम
टंडवा
24 5.
टंडवा
25 बरकुटे
(1 .
टंडवा
कायद
31 7.
32 नोडीहा
टंडवा
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] जिला
टिप्पणी
क्षेत्र ( एकड़ में) (लगभग)
क्षेत्र ( हेक्टेयर में ) (लगभग)
6
5
8
7
262.75
लातेहार
649.00
भाग 236.84
लातेहार
585.00
भाग लातेहार
51.82
128.00
भाग चतरा
212.14
524.00
भाग चतरा
भाग 103.02
254.46
चतरा
भाग 321.05
793.00
67.62
चतरा
167.00
भाग 1255.24
3100,46
कुल क्षेत्र :
कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 की धारा 4 ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित किए जाने वाले क्षेत्र की सीमा का वर्णन ।
कोयद और मनातु ब्लॉक , सीमा का वर्णन :
: रेखा ' क ' से आरम्भ होकर मनातु और बनवार ग्रामों के भाग से होकर गुजरती है और ' ख ' बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।
खग : रेखा , बनवार और कुरलुंगा , बनालात तथा कुरलुंगा , बरकुटे और कुरलुंगा , बरकुटे और सराधु , कोयद और सराधु कोयद और हेचाबलिया ग्रामों के भाग की सम्मिलित सीमाओं से गुजरती हुई ' ग ' बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।
ग-घ : रेखा , कोयद और नोनेहे , नौडीहा और नोनेहे ग्रामों की सम्मिलित सीमाओं से होती हुई ' घ ' बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।
घक : रेखा , नौडीहा , कोयद , सोपरम , बनालात और मनातु ग्रामों के भागों से होकर प्रारंभ बिन्दु ' क ' पर मिलती है ।
[फा. सं. 43015 / 11 / 2010/पी आर आई डब्ल्यू-1 ]
एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 5th August , 2010
S.O. 1936. Whereas , it was notified by the Central Government that coal is to be obtained from the lands in the locality mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed ;
Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Area ( Acquisitions and Development ) Act, 1957 ( 20 of 1957 ) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein ;
The Plan bearing number Rev./02/2010 , dated the 2nd January , 2010 of the area covered by this notification can be inspected in the office of the General Manager ( Land and Revenue) , Darbhanga House , Central Coalfields Limited , Ranchi or General Manager , Rajhara Area or Dy . Commissioner , Latehar , and Deputy Commissioner , Chatra , Jharkhand or atthe office of the Chief General Manager ( Exploration Division ) , Central Mine Planning and Design Institute , Gondwana Place , Kanke Road , Ranchi or at the office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata .
All persons interested in the land covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , chart and other documents referred in sub - section ( 7 ) of section 13 of the said Act to the Officer - in - Charge or General Manager ( Land & Revenue) , Central Coalfields Limited , Ranchi within ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette .
[ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
SCHEDULE
4731
Koyed & Manatu Block Coal Mining Block
District - Latehar and Chatra (Jharkhand)
Plan bearing number : Rev./102/2010 , dated the 2nd January, 2010
ALL RIGHTS
District
Thana
St. No.
Mauja/ Village
Village/ Thana- No.
49
Balumath
Latehar
1. Banalat
2.
50 Manatu
Balumath
Balumath 51 3.
Latehar
Banwar
24 4..
Chatra
Tandwa
Soparam
25
Chatra
5.
Tandwa
Barkute
Chatra
31 6. Koed
Tandwa
Chatra
7. Naudiha
Tandwa 32
Remarks
Area (inacres) (approx.)
Area (in hectare) (approx.)
262.75
649.00
Part
Part 236.84
585.00
Latehar
Part 51.82
128.00
524.00
Part 212.14
254.46
Full 103.02
793.00
Part 321.05
67.62
167.00
Part 1255.24
3100.46
Total Area:
Boundary description of the area being notified under Section 4 ( 1 ) of the CBA ( A& D ) Act , 1957
Koyed and Manatu Block, Boundary Description :
A-B Line starts from ' A ' and passes through Part villages Manatu and Banwar meets at point 'B ' .
B-C Line passes, through common boundary of part villages Banwar and Kurlunga , Banalat & Kurlunga, Barkute and Kurlunga, Barkutu and Saradhu , Koed and Saradhu , Koed and Hechabalia and meets at point' C' .
C-D Line passes , through common boundary of Koed and Honhe Naudiha and Honhe and meets at point ' D' .
D- A Line passes , through in part villages Naudiha, Koed, Sopram, Banalat and Manatu and meets at starting point 'A' .
[F. No. 43015 / 11 / 2010- PRIW- I ] M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 5 अगस्त, 2010
का. आ. 1937.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित भूमि में कोयला अधिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है ;
अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) की धारा 4 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तिया का प्रयोग करते हुए उस भूमि में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है;
इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक संख्या राजस्व/ 01 /2010 , तारीख 2 जनवरी , 2010 का निरीक्षण महाप्रबंधक ( भूमि और राजस्व ) , दरभंगा हाउस , सेंट्रल कोलफिल्ड्स लिमिटेड , रांची या महाप्रबंधक, रजहरा क्षेत्र या उपायुक्त , हजारीबाग और उपायुक्त चतरा, झारखंड के कार्यालय में या मुख्य महाप्रबन्धक ( खोज प्रभाग ) , केन्द्रीय खनन योजना और डिजाईन संस्थान, गोंडवाना प्लेस , काके रोड, रांची के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट कोलकाता के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है;
2904 G1/2010-7 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
[ PART I SEC. 3 ( ii) ] इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाली भूमि में हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी कार्यों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशित की तारीख से नब्बे दिनों के भीतर भारसाधक अधिकारी या महाप्रबंधक और राजस्व ) , सेंट्रल कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड , रांची को भेजेंगे ।
अनुसूची
पचरा और पचरा साउथ कोल माइनिंग ब्लॉक जिला - चतरा और हजारीबाग ( झारखण्ड)
रेखांक संख्या राजस्व/01/2010 तारीख 2 जनवरी , 2010
मौजा/ग्राम
थाना/ग्राम सं.
थाना
4
3
1.4
बड़कागांव
टीबरियातु
जोरदार
15
बड़कागांव
टंडवा
47
टंडवा
48 पचनरा
टंडवा
53 सिझुआ
6
टंडवा
54 उरमु
टंडवा
55 बुकरू
जिला
टिप्पणी क्षेत्र ( हेक्टेयर में ) (लगभग )
क्षेत्र ( एकड़ में ) (लगभग)
7
5
6
82.59
हजारीबाग
204.00
भाग
368.42
910.00
भाग हजारीबाग
56.27
चतरा
भाग
139.00
चतरा
292.35
722.11
पूर्ण
228.81
चतरा
565.18
पूण
64.26
चतरा
158.71
भाग चतरा
403.65
997.00
भाग
1496,35 3696.00
कुल क्षेत्र:
कायला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 की धारा 4 ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित किए जाने वाले क्षेत्र की सीमा का पचापचन साउथ ब्लॉक , सीमा का वर्णन :
गा ' क ' से आरम्भ होती है और गांव नात्राखाप और सेरंदाग , पचनारा और बिंगलात , सिझुआ और कुमारांग कलां , बुकरू और उरसु के पश्चिमी सम्मिलित सीमा के साथ साथ और गड़ही नदी के मध्य से होते हुए ' ग ' बिन्दु पर मिलती है।
: रेखा गांव बुकरु से होते हुए ' घ ' बिन्दु पर मिलती है। : रेखा , बुकरू, जोरदाग और छट्टीबरियातु ग्रामों के आंशिक भाग से होते हुए ' ङ ' बिन्दु पर मिलती हैं।
रेखा छट्टीबरियातु और नावाखाप ग्रामों के आंशिक भाग से होते हुए प्रारंभ विन्दु ' क ' पर मिलती है।
[फा. सं. 43015/10/2010 - पी आर आई डब्ल्यू ।।
एम. शहाबुद्दीन अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 5th August , 2010
S.O. 1937.-- Whereas , it was notified by the Central Government that coal is to be obtained from the lands in the Soets mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Area Lacquisitons and Development ) Act , 1957 ( 20 of 1957 ) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to respect for coal therein;
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
473 The Plan bearing number- Rev./01/2010 dated the 2nd January , 2010 of the area covered by this notificatio be inspected at the Office of the General Manager ( Land and Revenue ) , Darbhanga House , Central Coalfields Lim Ranchi or General Manager , Rajhara Area or Deputy Commissioner , Hazaribagh , and Deputy Commissioner... Jharkhand or at the Office of the Chief General Manager (Exploration Division ) , Central Mine Plamong and Des gr Institute , Gondwana Place , Kanke Road , Ranchi or at the Office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata All persons interested in the land covered by this notification shall deliver all maps , chart and other documents referred in sub - section ( 7 ) of section 13 of the said Act to the Officer - in- Charge or General Manager ( Land & Revenue ) , Central Coalfields Limited , Ranchi within ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette .
SCHEDULE
Pachra and Pachra South Coal Mining Block
District - Chatra and Hazaribagh ( Jharkhand)
Plan bearing number Rev. / 01 / 2010 dated the 2nd January , 2010
District
Thana
St. No.
Mauja/ Village
Village/ Thana- No.
14
Chhattibariatu
!
Hazaribagh
Barkagaon
2.
Hazaribagh
Barkagaon 15
Jordag
Chatra
Tandwa 47
3. Nawakhap
48
Chatra 4
Tandwa
Pachanra
Chatra
53
Tandwa
5. Sijhua
54
Chatra
Tandwa
Ursu
Chatra
55
Tandwa
Bukru
Total Area
Remarks
Area (inacres) (approx.)
Area (in hectare) (approx.)
Part
82.59
204.00
Part
368.42
910.00
Part
139.00'
56.27
Full
722.11
292.35
Fuli
565.18
228.81
Part
64.26
158.71
Part
997.00
403.65
3696.00
1496.35
Boundary description of the area being notified under section 4 ( 1 ) of the Coal Bearing Area ( Acquisition ar Development ) Act , 1957
Pachra and Pachra South Block Boundary Description :
A- B- C
Line starts from ' A ' and passes through along with centre line of Garhi Nadi Western common boundary of villages Nawakhap and Serandag , Pachanra and Bingalat , Sijhua and Kumarang Kalan , Bukru Ursu and meets at point ' C '
C-D
Line passes , through in village Bukru and meets at point ' D'
D-E
Line passes , through in part villages Bukru , Jordag and Chhatibaraitu and meets at point 'E' .
E-A
Line passes , through in part villages Chattibariatu and Nawakhap and meets at starting point 'A ' .
[ Γ . Νο 43015 /10/ 2010 - PRIW- 1 M. SHAHABUDEEN , Under S 4734
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
1 पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 29 जुलाई , 2010
बलेइपूर का.आ. 1938. केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज चाडपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का.आ. 3037 तारीख 4 नवम्बर , 2009 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट उड़ीसा राज्य की तहसील : एरसमा , जिला : जगतसिंहपुर की भूमि में , परादीप - सम्बलपुर- रायपुर- राँची पाइपलाइन परियोजना के कार्यान्वयन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा उड़ीसा राज्य में पारादीप से रायपुर ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) एवं राँची ( झारखण्ड ) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए पाइपलाइन बिछाने हेतु उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की भोषणा की थी;
और उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 15 दिसम्बर , 2009 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;
भइँचो और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धार ( 1 ) के खान सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
बरेइकण केन्द्रीय सरकार ने रक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के नान् इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार अर्जित करने का विनिश्चिय किया है;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप-धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाता है;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
साइँटोल अनुसूची
तहसील- एरसमा
[ PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2
3
4
5 432
00 06
40
00 22
12 435
448
00 03
30 447
00 02
38 446
00
00
02
00
56
16
443
424
00 01
08
00
407
00
20
03
408
00
45 409
00 01
44 410
00
52
02
411
07
00
92 412
00
05
40
00 00
395
30 397
00 08
15 396
24
00 03
00 01
21 398
00
549
00
39 1
00
12
08 376
00 02
49 378
00
00
78 379
00 00
20 383
00 06
32
00 03
384
18 382
00 00
20 403
00 02
90 398
00 03
34
10
00
386
95 387
03
00
42
00
388
00
20 352
17
75
00
24
00
00
54 27
00 05
94
राज्य- उड़ीसा
जिला- जगतसिंहपुर
क्षेत्रफल
गांव का नाम
प्लाट नं.
हेक्टयर एयर
26
03
42
00
25
01
00
60
00
50
00
20
वर्ग मीटर
4
2
3
1
5
430
00 03
77
बलेइपूर
468
45
81
431
00 08
429
00
02
62 428
00 00
20 52
00 00
35 19
00 04
68
00
53
00
70 54
00 03
90
00
16
05
22 15
47
00 03
01
56
00
80 4735 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
SCHEDULE
4
2
3
5
Tehsil: Erasama District : Jagatsinghpur State: Orissa 57
00
72
08
साइँटोल
Name of the
Plot No.
Area
25
58
00 00
Sq . Mtr .
Hectare Are
Village
17
00
00
10
2
4
3
5
1
7
00
60
00
00
00
81
6
00
430
03
Baleipur
00
468
00
45
06
00
5
00
00 08
81
431
00
10
105
02
00
429
02
62 00
05
4
04
00
428
00
20
55
00 03
3
00 02
03
108
06
40
00
432
05
00
04
2
00
22
435
12
44
00 01
1
03
00
448
30
38
447
00 02 [सं. आर-25011/11/2009- ओ.आर -1 ]
00 02
00
446
बी. के. दत्ता , अवर सचिव
56
00
16
443
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
424
00 01
08 New Delhi , the 29th July , 2010
407
00
20
00
45
03
408
00
44
00
409
01
00 02
52
410
92
00 07
411
05
00
40
412
00
30
00
395
00 08
15
397
24
00 03
396
00 01
21
398
S.O. 1938. Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S.O. 3037 dated 4-11-2009 issued under sub section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land in Tehsil - Erasama, District - Jagatsinghpur , in Orissa State , specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum products from Paradip ( Orissa ) to Raipur ( Chhattisgarh ) and Ranchi (Jharkhand ) by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
00
00
39
Bhaincho
549
08
00 12
1
And whereas , copies of the said notification were made available to the public on 15th December 2009 ;
00 02
49
376
Bareikana
00 00
378
78 And whereas , the Competent Authority has under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted his report to the Central Government ;
00
00
20
379
00 06
32
383
00 03
18
384
00
00
20 And whereas , the Central Government has after considering the said report , decided to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification;
382
90
00 02
403
00 03
34
398
10
95
386
00
42
00 03
387
Now , therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
00
20
00
388
17
00
75
352
00
54
24
00
Saintol
94
05
00
27
42
00
26
03 And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 4 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , Central Government hereby directs the right of user in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on date of publication of this declaration , in Indian Oil Corporation Limited , free from all encumbrances .
4736
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 /SHRAVANA 16. 1932
[ P Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] 2
4
3
5
Saintol
25
00
01
60
00 00
20
50
श्री सुकांत कुमार प्रधान , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन अम्यन्न कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , पारादीप- सम्बलपुर -रायपुर राँची पाइन परियोजना, 1295 , फॉरेस्ट पार्क, भुवनेश्वर-751009 ( आदीमा का लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।
52
35
00 00
अनुसूची
00 04
19
68
53
70
गन्य उड़ीसा 00 00
जिला- अनुगुल
तहसील- किशोरनगर
54
00 03
90
गांव का नाम
प्लाट नं.
16
05
00
चग माटर 15
00 03
47
:
2
1
00 01
56
80
57
00
08
72
(X)
1241
जामुनालि
00
25
58
00
1228
10
00
17
00
1234
00
7
00
60
1233
6
00
00
81
1232
5
00 06
00
00 00
105
02
10
1230
81
(0) 4
00
05
04
17
1231
( K) 3
00
55
03
1184
00
26
02
00
108
03
00
10
1183
50 2
00 05
04
4
00
00
63
पार्बतीपुर
1
01
44
00
(X)
5
90
37 [No. R-25011 / 11 / 2009 - OR - 1 ]
21
358
(0) B. D. DATTA , Under Secy .
12
(X)
33 नई दिल्ली , 29 जुलाई , 2010
(X)
390
13
402
(X)
62
400
00
1:
2
00
80
00
399
84 का.आ. 1939.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप ( उड़ीसा ) से रायपुर ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) एवं राँची ( झारखण्ड) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिये इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा " पारादीप-सम्बलपुर- रायपुर- राँची पाइपलाइन " बिछाई जानी चाहिये;
398
(0)
00
60
407
00 10
14
00
396
03
87
689
00
37
81
कदलिमुण्डा
27
688
02 और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि, जिसके नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से उपावद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित है , में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
00
839
39
00
20
838
21
00 34
615
00 40
75
614
00 26
74 अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषण करती है;
653
00 00
90
840
00 00
10
954
00
10
16
599
00 03
78
582
00 02
98 कोई व्यक्ति , जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में
760
00 01
43 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010 / श्रावण 16 , 1932
{ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1
4
5
3
2
55
14
बडहुला
00
581
कदलिमुण्डा
88
00 03
761
79
08
00
575
87
09
00
576
97
00
00
949
05
01
00
771
41
43
00
578
19
13
'00
141
बडहला
79
10
00
1433
66
05
00
155
बएण्डा
01
04
00
153
10
00
00
1525
19
04
00
152
10
00
00
151
96
07
00
142
17
00
00
147
23
03
00
146
20
01
00
145
98
06
00
144
12
06
00
135
10
00
00
133
21
00 01
134
69
01
00
136
13
00 01
101
35
02
00
100
47
03
00
90
93
00
98
64
00
00
97
78
00
00
106
70
02
00
107
58
05
00
23
04
00
3
04
00
109
10
00
00
111
00
06
00
38
27
06
00
36
23
01
00
37
61
00 06
34
95
00 03
33
96
00
00.
438
66
02
00
30
72
08
00
29
71
00
00
28
4737
4
5
3
2
36
04
00
27
10
00
00
26
46
09
00
21
33
00
00
22
86
08
00
16
32
00
00
1462
70
05
00
15
26
09
00
14
53
01
00
457
38
15
00
1428
12
00
.00
2215
22
04
00
2189
36
04
00
2190
50
04
00
2191
40
14
00
2192
11
03
00
2199
24
16
00
2200
88
00
00
2186
02
20
00
2201
76
08
00
1948
83
04
00
2235
82
01
00
1946
93
01
00
1947
09
07
00
1949
85
05
00
1943
00
01
00
1906
84
00
00
1903
30
01'
00
1904
60
01
00
1905
82
00
00
1885
72
02
00
1886
35
02
00
1887
20
00
00
1883
10
00
00
1891
57
00
00
1879
01
82
00
1888
35
00
00
1878
69
02
00
1875
02
00
1876
10
00 00
1874
37
00
00
1869
00
00
1919
10
00
00
1918 4738
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16, 1932
2
3
4
5
1 बएण्डा
1868
00
02
14
बएण्डा 1920
00
00
89 1923
00 00
90 1925
00 01
13 1864
00 01
79 1863
00 00
96 1862
00 01
01 1926
00 03
73 1927
00 00
25 1923
00
00
90 1921
00 00
10 1922
00 00
10 1924
00 00
10 1932
00
00
10 1931
00 00
73 1930
00 00
22 1929
00
04
32 1928
00 01
28 1838
00 02
27 1939
00. 00
55 1840
00 00
15 1841
00 01
51
1836
00
01
45 1835
00 02
00
1933
00 00
10
964
00 01
76
963
82
962
00 01
83
966
45
968
00 02
06
961
00 01
79
969
00 03
93
960
00
00
93
3657
51
959
00 03
92
956
72
955
00 01
12
954
55
289
00 03
96
288
00 02
83
290
00 01
30
287
00 03
72
280
03
(0)
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 2
3
4
5 286
00 01
05 279
00 07
94 278
00 14
35 277
00 00
99 174
00 01
62 172
00 01
38 3488
00
00
43 159
00 00
10 173
00 04
56 170
00
00
10 169
00
00
10 94
00 00
10 93
00
00
10 92
00 07
77 91
00
07
45 90
00
05
79 89
00 08
48 86
00
16
94 3573
00 00
27 3617
00
01
60 3615
00
11
07 102
00
10
71 3578
00 02
30 82
00 00
45 3669
00 01
84 75
00 05
99 82
00
00
45 76
00
00
10 78
00
09
80
00
00
20 72
00
20
20 65
00 09
15 63
00 05
04 62
00
36 57
(1) 06
St 56
03
00
100
54
(0)
10 41
17
3779
00
84
01
36
00
15
30 3611
00
00
79 37
00
00
43 4739
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7, 2010/श्रावण 16, 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]
4
1 2
3
5
00 05
48 बएण्डा
3612
2
3
4
5 1223
00
72
00
सोलण्डा
00 04
13
3613
00 03
91
2168
सोलण्डा
1283
00 05
90
00
88
1284
02
01
00
1344
30 लुहामुण्डा
00 04
1343
90
.00 03
59
1342
00 02
68
1341
00 00
70
1350
00 00
10 1351
00 03
15
1340
54
1352
00 04
1339
10
00 01
1337
79
00 01
20
1338
00 00
56
1336
02
00
43
1328
00 01
1357
71
1327
00 02
15
1326
00
66
00
1321
00
94
00 04
1330
31
06
00
29
1315
00
00
15
1313
00
20
10
13
00
10
40
13:1
00
2450
03
10
1295
00 11
16
03
84
1310
00
40
1297
00 62
00- 00
1308
91
98
1309
00 02
09
1306
00 02
00
00
16
1305
1233
00 04
64 1222
00 08
83
00
30 1221
21
1235
01
00
80
00
85 2969
01
00 07
2968
54 2967
00 07
18
15 2983
00 00
00 09
88 2962
2984
00
39
00
2961
00
32
04
04
00
82 2960
00
36 2959
11
2947
84
11
00
2946
16
28
00
00
25 2994
04
34 2995
00 03
00
61 2996
02
00
16 2999
05
3000
00
46.
00
00 01
73 2944
00 26
55 2943
00
85
09
2942
00
2933
01
52
01
3011
00
10
39
00
52 3016
00 07
87 2908
00
10 2907
00
00
26
05
2906
00 04
80 5118
00
00
43 2909
00 01
62 5119
06
00
85 2910
00
73
05
2911
00 00
16 868
बणिनालि
00 07
82
2234
90
1206
00 03
00
57
1207
07
10
35
00
1208
04
1234
00
19
00
82
1229
02
82
00 04
1231
2904 G1/2010-8
08
00
88 866
42
00 01
967
00 03
19 1104
35
00 03
864
03
00
79 875
51
00 09
874 4740
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
1
2
3
4
5
1 बणिनालि
879
00 09
19 बणिनालि 885
00
01
17 882
00 02
46 883
00
10
41
1120
10 1161
00 01
27
892
00 08
07
893
00 02
83
894
00 03
55
1082
00 00
30
841
00 01
45
840
00
02
52
839
00 08
45
837
00 02
23
836
00 03
61
835
00
18
97
826
00 06
89
827
00 01
29
825
00
00
83
824
00 08
44
823
00 01
26
पापसरा 1087
00
00
49
829
00 00
10
817
00 00
91
816
00
13
41
815
00 08
73
803
00
14
25
802
00
02
08
804
00 02
95
805
00 01
35
-793
82
806
00
01
66
785
00
09
47
784
3 03
68
791
00
00
20
787
00
05
84
747
00 01
19
7:48
00
02
26
749
00
03
89
750
00 01
62
736
00 04
43
740
00
79
741
00
ΟΙ
11
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 2
3
4
5 742
00 00
62 739
00 00
81 738
.00 00
10 743
00 00
61 721
00 01
43 719
00 00
89 720
00 00
58 718
00 00
75 713
00
00
42 712
00 01
60 711
00 01
04 706
00
00
51 707
00 01
90 708
00 00
68 1128
00 19
38 758
00
02
76 759
00 06
26 793
00
00
16 760
00
07
56 761
00 02
20 3586
00 02
25 3575
00 00
95 3585
00 01
43 3578
00 03
01 3577
04
00
83 3576
00 03
36 3572
00
09
87 3571
00 02
92 3573
00 05
67 3517
00 34
03 3539
00
01
08 3520
00 02
26 3527
00
03
87 3526
00
10
44 3528
00 01
29 4059
00 02
70 3524
00
04
92 3525
00 07
18 3386
00
00
10 3398
00 08
11 3397
00
09
85 3396
00
11
55 3387
00 04
96 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7, 2010/श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
=
1
5
4
3
2
1
पापसरा
45
12
00
3395
पापसरा
74
05
00.
3392
20
08
00
3394
84
04
00
3393
23
10
00
3322
64
09
00
3319
10
00
00
3324
61
12
00
3312
54
01
00
3313
95
01
00
3314
66
02
00
3311
60
02
00
3310
20
02
00
3155
10
00
00
3154
45
00
00
4103
44
05
00
3156
10
00 02
3157
30 3158
41
03
00
3163
83
00 02
3162
92
00 03
3164
00
02
00
3165
76
00
00
3229
84
08
00
3166
10
00
00
3167
99
02
00
3172
00
02
00
3173
78
00
04
3174
69
01
00
3175
66
01
00
3176
47
01
00
3177
42
00 03
3185
60
02
00
3186
47
09
00
3188
21
00 01
3187
13
01
00
3189
23
00
00
3193
08
00 01
3191
83
00 02
3190
98
01
00
3117
35
02
00
2613
12
10
00
2685
10
00
00
2686
4741
4
3
2
06
00
2683
61
00
00
2682
41
01
90
2681
91
00
2691
94
04
00
2680
55
01
00
2679
16
00
00
2677
97
06
00
2678
32
00
00
2676
79
03
00
1102
91
07
00
1097
05
03
00
1096
84
00
00
4189
73
01
00
1093
98
04
00
1090
65
07
00
1091
96
02
00
1086
33
02
00
1085
88
03
00
1083
40
05
00
1082
10
00
00
1079
05
04
00
1081
63
00
00
1080
05
00 10
982
10
00
00
976
00
00
977
17
00
00
978
87
00
00
979
20
03
00
980
89
00
00
981
22
04
00
915
11
00
02
4152
10
00
00
919
12
00
914
52
02
00
913
40
00
00
912
38
03
00
899
52
00
00
900
10
00
00
911
62
00 01
910
30
00
00
902
31
01
00
909
39
00
00
903 4742
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
1
2
3
4
5
1 पापसरा
904
00 00
67
कटरन्गा 908
01
00
34 905
00 01
47 907
00 02
02
00 01
806
62 882
00 03
97 858
00 08
58 878
00 08
63 877
00 03
13 875
00 02
39 876
00 03
38 869
10 871
00 02
88 872
00 04
79 401
00 02
00 400
00 00
73
398
00 02
40 397
00 01
79
396
00 00
10
कटरन्गा
1293
00
06
35
1292
00 01
60 कृष्णपुर 1285
00 08
62
1284
00
ΟΙ
64
1283
00 07
81
1282
00 00
13
1277
00
10
88
1278
10
1276
58
1266
00 06
01
1265
00 01
20
1264
00 01
13
1263
00 03
54
1257
00 03
07
1258
00 02
47
1256
81
1255
00 05
53
1254
00 02
36
1102
86
1113
00 OC
47
1247
00 05
74
1246
00 04
85
1114
00 06
49
1116
00 02
02
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2
3
4
5 1117
00 00
84 1118
00 00
80 913
00 00
90 912
00
09
23 1119
00 00
10 1121
00 03
18 1122
00 03
06 1125
00 05
86 1128
00 01
82 1129
00 01
85 1130
00 05
10 1134
00 05
73 1135
00 06
04 1137
00 07
45 1138
00 03
96 1140
00 15
91 1145
00 14
56 1152
00 00
90 1154
00 22
58 1156
00
12
15 925
00 14
02 1041
00 03
50 926
00
00
70 927
00 04
09 928
00 08
27 929
00 03
33 930
00 09
69 933
00 10
01 934
00 02
30 970
00 01
83 969
00 08
33 968
00 11
62 967
00 00
10 972
00
07
29 1176
00 01
36 975
00
10
73 1177
00 04
15 1180
00 00
10 978
00
06
94 976
00 01
84 977
00 02
72 451
00
19
07 446
61
00 4743
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1
5
4
3
2
1
82 कृष्णपुर
02
00
445
कृष्णपुर
85
09
00
444
29
00
00
5
4
3
2
21
04
00
34
60
04
00
36
10
00
00
67
आम्बमुण्डा
443
93
07
00
437
70
05
00
426
32
07
00
427
10
00
00
1102
96
02
00
428
49
02
00
432
34
00
00
429
73
08
00
430
73
03
00
415
28
01
00
409
27
07
00
410
15
00 00 .
414
59
01
00
407
92
07
00
411
78
00 04
316
58
02
00
315
69
00
00
317
46
10
00.
319
82
01
00
314
72
06
00
313
38
02
00
312
10
00
00
311
79
00
00
68
25
01
00
71
67
01
00
70
60
04
00
49
03
00
51
00 03
50
29
00
94
00
00
35
53
01
00
34
62
18
00
33
05
00 01
28
70
00
00
32
60
05
00
31
60
08
00
30
81
00
00
958
45
12
00
29
40
05
00
26
95
13
00
21
96
02
00
22
58
13
00
19
18
01
00
18
57
17
00 .
640
गदेइमुण्डा
90
05
00
324
11
00
00
323
10
00
00
322
70
00 07
335
17
05
00
336
68
01
00
333
48
13
00
337
42
08
00
339
62
12
00
349
64
00
348
00
12
18
341
00
70
01
00
44
57
00 19
10
02
00
31
06
00
08
::
00
33
55
00
00
630
17
02
00
632
75
05
00
414
10
00
00
415
06
01
00
633
83
02
00
413
79
02
00
412
33
00
00
1615
27
03
00
402
01
19
00
409
00
10
00
408
81 403
00 04
74
00
404
24
02
00
405
60
07
00
397
73
00
00
00
00
373 4744
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
1
2
3
4
5
1 424
गदेइमुण्डा
00 09
06 गदेइमुण्डा 426
00 03
86
425
00 02
83
427
00 03
13
360
00
00
44
359
00 03
24
358
00 03
90
73
00 03
60
खालपाल 72
00 03
20
68
00
00
10
67
00 00
44
71
00 03
93
74
00 01
62
70
00 02
81
75
00 02
25
78
00 02
01
79
00 03
60
293
00 05
40
83
00 01
25
85
00 03
79
86
00 00
84
88
00 04
93
87
00 06
62
93
00 02
79
94
00 01
40
95
00 00
41
205
00 02
46
204
00 07
21
96
00 04
03
199
00
06
42
202
10
198
00 03
36
184
00 13
03
200
00
00
10
201
00 00
10
182
00 03
93
181
00
03
74
177
00
11
36
180
83
178
00 01
96
169
00 04
35
1549
20
168
00 05
52
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 2
4
3
5 1548
00 00
10 167
00 02
51 245
00
00
25 166
00 05
19 164
00 01
82 1639
00 03
52 165
00 02
90 598
00 04
15 625
00 01
55 624
00 02
24 599
00 01
97 600
00 00
18 603
00 24
93 572
00 13
79 571
00 00
14 663
00 04
31 604
00 02
74 570
00 09
80 569
00 16
56 642
00
00
10 566
00 11
44 567
00 00
10 565
00 06
65 564
00 02
11 522
00
14
39 523
00 01
62 524
00 02
40 525
00 00
20 516
00 06
46 515
00 01
00 514
00
07
82 513
00
00
96 502
00
10
00 472
00 03
66 473
00 05
06 475
00
00
10 474
00 02
08 408
00
05
49 409
00
10
35 399
00 00
97 398
00 04
42 397
00 02
79 396
00 04
48 4745
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 7, 2010/श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1
4
5
3
2
1
रघुनाथपुर
68
00 01
411
खालपाल
73
00 03
394
18
01
00
390
05
92
00
392
23
00
00
391
58
02
00
369
39
03
00
364
38
08
00
363
17
12
00
362
05
19
00
359
11
00
00
358
20
00
00
61
परशुमाल
88
10
00
59
10
00
00
60
11
00
00
1525
72
04
00
56
54
01
00
1582
75
02
00
85
03
00 30
86
99
10
00
113
16
14
00
106
42
02
00
107
02
30
00
111
23
02
00
110
00
20
00
109
81
12
00
128
52
00 11
130
10 131
10
00
00
132
22
00
00
173
74
03
00
138
54
04
00
140
94
02
00
139
42
05
00
144
15
00 07
165
36
00
00
167
74
05
00
166
90 कुरुमटाप
00
00
357
61
02
00
1576
84
02
00
358
20
00
00
356
92
03
00
359
90
00 01
371
00
10
00
372
4
5
3
2
23
00 04
691
75
08
00
692
38
00 02
693
81
02
00
787
70
00 00
695
94
00
04
710
95
00 03
711
35
00
00
709
03
87
00
712
06
04
00
683
21
08
00
728
00
10
00
725
04
33
00
730
28
00 01
727
37
05
00
731
15
00
00
671
39
05
00
668
94
00 03
669
10
00
00
670
16
00 04
658
40
00 11
664
94
00 04
659
85
02
00
651
07
02
00
649
89
00 03
653
70
00
03
818
07
04
00
583
10
00 02
584
22
05
00
577
91
07
00
575
07
22
00
574
00
10.
00
587
70
15
00
572
02
02
00
571
04
98
00
570
39
00
00
568
33
01
00
710
91
00 05
709
63
00
00
708
45
07
00
712
70
10
00
713
53
09
00
716
75
00
00
717 4746
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 /SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
1
2
3
4
5
1 723
00
कुरुमटाप
04
35 कुरुमटाप 706
00 05
32 705
00
02
06 704
00 00
59 703
00
03
83 702
00
04
55 701
00 06
11 698
00 00
45 697
00
01
92 693
00 00
29 696
00 02
97 694
00 07
33 687
00 08
35
688
00 02
70 678
00 03
33
677
00 01
29 676
00 02
08
675
00 00
10
667
00 10
04
640
00 08
08
639
00 13
93
637
08
34
00
590
00 03
99
596
06
26
595
00
91
तुरुडा 594
10
22
593
00
95
592
00
16
565
00 06
18
567
00
10
561
14
75
550
00
05
34
556
07
95
554
04
81
467
03
00
10
466
03
43
469
01
18
00
465
00 05
21
454
00 02
40
455
96
453
00
00
50
457
00 05
48
458
00
96
01
[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 2
3
4
5 459
00 00
65 460
00
28
01
461
00
04
76 388
00 05
77 371
00
07
82 2026
00
00
79 382
00 02
49 370
00 20
84 352
00 06
19 344
00
00
10 343
00 03
46 338
00 13
86 379
00 00
10 92
00 02
67 91
00
06
93 90
00
CO
61 89
00 02
91 88
00 04
97 72
00
59 73
00
67 87
00
6!
74
00
29 75
00
26 76
00
53 560
00
68 569
00
10 568
00
10 566
00
77 367
93
00
5.1
00 01
42 565
00 06
23 572
00
26 563
00 06
95 547
00
13
56 3102
00 03
29 599
00
37
00
598
00 04
30 3103
07
00
10 604
00 04
96 605
00 04
04 507
00 03
24 506
00 00
73 505
00
00
91 4747
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7, 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
1
5
4
3
2
1
69 तुरुडा
01
00
504
तुरुडा
78
05
00
503
28
5
4
3
2
97
05
00
30
71
04
00
31
62
01
00
592
कण्धरामुण्डा
17
00
631
10
00
00
636
21
01
00
633
85
00
00
634
91
01
00'
632
10
00
00
460
14
00
00
461
66
01
00
3205
60
04
00
468
40
02
00
469
33
01
00
470
60
02
00
467
17
02
00
465
40
02
00
466
86
12
00
310
04
03
00
293
89
04
00
292
37
00
00
297
95
291
75
06
00
290
86
02
00
298
54
01
00
76
15
03
00
289
53
00
00
77
09
09
00
78
05
00 03
286
18
08
00
79
80
04
00
80
57
01
00
3277
94
02
00
82
60
05
00
83
61
00
00
84
25
04
00
85
16
05
00
69
29
03
00
86
82
06'
00
70
49
02
00
68
09
00 01
41
23
00
00
39
08
02
00
40
34
26
00
29
2904GI/2010-9
41
11
00
593
94
01
00
904
16
02
00
725
09
03
00
724
06
07
00
713
22
05
00
712
74
00
00
709
69
01
00
711
42
00
00
710
09
08
00
594
10
00
00
707
04
02
00
704
32
00
00
703
83
01
00
595
47
04
00
597
41
02
00
596
14
02
00
561
81
04
00
560
10
00
00
558
56
03
00
559
92
02
00
562
10
00
00
566
56
04
00
569
17
01
00
568
71
06
00
573
75
00
00
570
71
02
00
571
02
02
00
572
08
00
01
577
20
02
00
574
72
02
00
575
58
00
00
576
81
06
00
473
33
00
00
474
12
02
00
461
10
01
00
436
50
00
00
435
95
07
00
437
46
00
00
438
81
00
00
875 4748
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2010 / SHRAVANA 16. 1932
1
2
3
5
1 439
कण्धरामुण्डा
00 04
18 बुदुलिमुण्डा 441
00 01
21
440
00 01
17
418
00
00
10
446
00
06
82
887
00 00
81
416
00 00
10
-415
00
02
(2
398
00 01
27
414
00 06
04
401
00 02
68
400
00
00
48
410
38
402
00 04
81
404
00 01
14
408
00 01
89
403
00 05
384
00
00
409
धुरुडुपाल
00 01
72
365
00
20
78
380
00
01
23
848
00 02
41
366
10
368
00 02
23
367
00
16
74
76
महुलमुण्डा
00
05
89
00 27
48
103
03
00
20
रसुणपाल 107
00 01
58
80
00 00
10
87
00 00
10
88
00
24
09
27
73
29
00
00
67
26
00 11
62
90
00 00
10
24
00
05
17
118
00. 17
55
22
00 07
21
35
बुदुलिमुण्डा
00 05
14
1993
00
18
99
34
00 01
87
33
00
04
53
32
00
01
20
25
00 07
15
[PART II--SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2
3
4
5 26
00
00
50 22
09
00
69 1916
00 03
37 15
00
06
32 16
00 02
59 14
00
00
10 12
00
00
54 1915
00. 01
62 13
00
01
91 7
00
05
80 11
00 00
37 8
00 00
22 1913
00
02
88 4
00
07
14 3
00
04
29 1912
00 02
91 5
00
00
24 1041
00
02
39 1040
00 28
12 1202
00
00
12 1036
00 06
20 1035
00 07
01 1037
00
14
33 1038
00
00
927
00
00
93 926
00
65
04
430
00
04
60 34
44
00
70 45
00
51
77 48
00
16
79 47
00
02
76 49
00 07
51 50
00
02
43 455
00
02
55 51
00 07
45 486
00
10
47 488
00
01
66 30
00
17
85 27
00 13
49 445
00
02
23 31
00
09
10. 38
00
07
79 33
00 20
40 4749
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 7, 2010/श्रावण 16, 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1
5
4
3
2
83 गाडघुमुरा
51
00
467
खउदर
70
18
00
468
87
16
00
305
53
07
00
304
61
03
00
303
10
00
00
302
16
01
00
301
10
00
00
300
10
00 06
299
झारबेरणी
46
02
00
297
00
17
00
397
00.
38
00
291
48
07
00
241
10
00
00
243
47
10
00
242
30
04
00
461
92
14
00
87
05
01
00
88
15
00 02
430
10
00
00
82
70
06
00
83
95
00
00
278
05
01
00
689
गाडघुमुरा
35
02
00
376
42
00
00
374
37
00 01
659
38
03
00
375
10
00
00
156
89
03
00
155
79
01
00
158
64
00 02
159
10
00
00
154
02
00 03
160
10.
00
00
153
15
05
00
161
39
04
00
146
58
00 01
132
13
01
00
145
85
00 04
133
12
01
00
136
27
01
00
135
58
08
00
134
98
04
00
70
67
00 01
72
25
06
00
71
21
04
00
63
5
4
3
2
16
14
00
43
93
00 02
44
79
03
00
42
19
12
00
40
92
00
00
559
81
00
00
38
89
00
00
37
10
00
00
36
10
00
00
144
36
00
00
143
58
04
00
142
98
01
00
141
74
02
00
140
42
02
00
1302
19
04
00
135
10
00
00
134
85
01
00
136
88
02
00
137
73
02
00
130
40
00
00
129
07
04
00
127
75
21
00
121
25
04
06
120
20
(0)
00
119
88
05
00
82
30
06
00
83
20
00
()
117
20
00
116
20
00
00
115
64
04
00
84
54
02
00
85
99
01
00
87
02
01
00
113
10
00
88
40
04
111
42
02
00
110
84
00 10
109
39
00
1274
04
00
108
79
02
00
107
20
04
00
106
43
04
00
103
70
07
00
102 4750
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 /SHRAVANA 16, 1932
1
2
3
4
5
1 झारबेरणी
101
00 00
10 झारबेरणी 99
00 04
04 100
00 00
49 1240
00
04
04 98
00 00
94 1241
00 01
05 344
00 04
55 345
00 03
59
1213
00 00
26 38
00 00
69 घोषर 37
00 00
20
35
00
00
15
346
00 04
44
351
00 01
48
33
10
347
00
01
62
350
00 00
74
348
00
06
06
349
00 04
68
506
00 05
83
507
00 02
70
25
40
508
00 02
09
505
00 02
61
509
00 02
91
512
00 01
19
511
00 03
03
.510
00 03
23
514
00 08
29
515
00 13
31
516
00 03
62
517
00 05
63
518
00 02
75
532
00 10
22
531
00 03
35
533
00 01
29
534
33
535
00
18
35
536
00 02
38
537
31
564
10
569
00 29
48
567
00
00
10
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )] 2
3
4
5 568
00 02
20 576
00 02
62 575
00 02
49 1223
00 02
10 573
00 01
03 1261
00 08
79 570
00 00
10 1234
00 00
57 974
00 01
55 2954
00 01
76 2970
00
00
45 2971
00 02
31 2973
00 24
47 2976
00 .08
75 2975
00 01
20 2980
00
44
45 2983
00 07
70 2982
00
19
63 3005
00 08
04 3028
00
00
30 3027
00 04
20 3794
00
01
79 3025
00 05
57 3026
00 05
58 3024
00 01
86 3066
00 05
3064
00
05
64 3065
00 01
41 3063
00 01 '
62 3068
00
04
70 3067
00 03
11 3060
00 00
10 3069
00 02
47 3070
00
04
56 3071
00 00
46 3072
00
02
83 3075
00 00
10 3092
00
ΟΙ
16 3073
00 05
37 3074
00
00
53 3091
00 05
05 3104
00 03
09 3103
00 02
73 भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 7, 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1
5
4
3
2
1
घोषर
33
00
00
3102
घोषर
72
02
00
3704
43
06
00
3112
42
04
00
3111
30
02
00
3150
45
03
00'
3151
26
03
00
3155
49
00 04
3156
10
00
00
3168
40
00
00
1871
14
02
00
1870
57
01
00
1869
56
00 08
1877
81
00
00
1881
50
00
00
1880
27
05
00
1879
10
00
00
1900
60
00 01
1901
00
10
00
1863
51
00 05
1902
29
00
.00
1841
45
06
00
1903
10
00
00
1907
31
00
00
1906
04
58
00
1905
44
00
00
1904
91
02
00
1840
00
27
00
1834
10
02
00
1839
76
03
00
1835
48
00 02
1836
30
08
00
1812
10
00
00
1832
37
00
00
1816
34 1806
10 1814
72
00 05
1813
10
00
00
1759
08
01
00
1805
10
05
00
1760
33
00
00
1804
94
00 03
1761
49
02
00
1758
4751
4
5
3
2
91
02
00
1763
22
02
00
1764
05
00 02
1754
17
00
00
1765
78
03
00
1766
14
00
00
1767
07
00 03
1768
85
00
00
1770
14
00 03
1769
58
00
00
1640
00
22
00
1664
13
00 03
1658
14
02
00
1657
84
00
02
1656
10
00
00
1650
69
01
00
1651
69
04
00
1652
42
01
00
1653
10
00
00
1645
38
01
00
1647
35
00 02
1646
47
00 05
1618
23
00
00
1617
33
03
00
1619
81
.01
00
1621
13
00
00
1620
62
00 00
1622
10
00
00
1603
80
01
00
1602
00
20
00
1592
60
04
00
1601
28
01
00
1600
10
00
00
1594
13
00
03
1595
48
00
00
1596
68
03
00
1581
00
50
00
1580
43
03
00
841
00
40
00
1582
14
00 02
634
00
10
00
640
10
00
00
635
36
00 03
639 4752
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2010/SHRAVANA 16, 1932
2
3
4
5
1 घोषर
638
00 01
36 घोषर 643
00 02
78 644
00
00
10 642
00 03
20 837
00
00
16 828
00 02
42 826
00
00
10 836
41 829
00 04
04 832
00
01
00 830
00
01
09 831
00 03
60 3788
00 00
29 822
00
00
10 823
00 04
66 817
10 816
00 02
04 815
00 00
55 812
00 02
96
813
00 01
21
811
00 00
83
810
00 04
08
800
00 01
75
801
10
809
00 01
93
808
00 06
47
3787
00 00
32
807
24
935
10
3786
81
806
00 03
80
936
00
00
20
941
00
00
10
775
00 06
19
774
00 04
82
773
00 01
69
942
00 05
00
946
00 02
25
943
00
00
10
945
00 02
20
960
00 02
66
961
00
00
10
963
00 03
88
[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] 2
3
4
5 959
00 03
69 958
00
01
03 965
00
06
26 966
00 05
53 967
00 01
53 1004
00 ΟΙ
22 3873
00
00
77 3872
00 00
10 1005
00 05
37 1002
00
03
96 1003
00
00
10 1001
00
02
43 1000
00 08
53 999
00
01
88 996
00 00
95 998
00 07
31 1023
00 01
19 3760
00 05
00 992
00
01
36 1024
00
03
71 135
00
01
99 3759
00 00'
10 134
00 06
89 129
00 03
12 130
00 04
43 132
00 04
65 110
00
00
10 111
00
01
74 113
00 03
12 131
00 08
14 120
00 03
83 119
00 02
41 118
00 02
92 3757
00 03
01 116
00
06
77 103
00
11
29 3889
00 08
25 3888
00 00
10 3659
00
02
89 53
00 03
33 54
00
05
25 55
00
00
10 58
00 06
12 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010 / श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1
4
5
3
2
1
82
11
00
4753
4
5
3
2
21
01
00
1325
पाण्डुरिपथर
186
घोषर
24
05
00
59
50
17
00
61
76
06
00
69
71
07
00
60
90
00 08
82
10
00 08
998
पाण्डुरिपथर
35
00 02
555
15
02
00
546
02
00
545
48
01
00
547
59
00 01
548
53
00 08
549
25
00
00
544
91
03
00
542
61
14
00
541
68
02
00
540
95
01
00
566
24
00 01
573
78
00
00
572
56
00
00
1165
54
01
00
571
48
00
00
592
56
00 00
570
18
01
00
595
39
00
00
596
91
03
00
599
10
00
00
604
76
01
00
21
00 01
204
21
00 01
205
21
01
00
206
22
02
00
202
21
00 01
207
00
10
00
213
10
00
00
214
30
00
00
1208
10
00 00
212
62
00 01
208
08
00 03
209
00
10
00
1081
85
00
20
163
98
06
00
164
00
10
00
1008
Π
01
00
165
03
01
00
1241
00
10
00
1242
14
05
00
166
19
00
67
46
17
02
00.
68
01
27
00
1003
48
02
00
73
21
00
04
70
70
09
00
71
67
30
00
38
76
03
00
1
28
00
536
श्रीबन्तमुण्डा
602
43
00 02
601
10
00 00
600
44
02
00
622
86
01
00
623
10
02
00
626
98
00
00
625
01
00 03
640
47
06
00
242
01
52
00
243
18
01
00
1180
83
00
00
1009
62
01
00
1144
81
203
10
00
00
1209
83
01
00
284
99
02
00
285
84
02
00
540
09
47 279
00
61
00
00
505
52'
17'
00
278
00
004
89 280
00
02
05 132
84
00
01
131
03
02
00
130
09
32
00
129
13
00
00
128
04
05
00
127
02
00
125
40 4754
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
1
2
3
4
5
1 126
00
श्रीबन्तमुण्डा
08
87 जएराट.
556
00 00
10 91
00 03
39 534
00
00
92 92
00 03
91 89
00 03
54 533
00
00
28 527
00
01
35 93
00
01
25 94
00
00
56 82
00 12
24 79
00 03
84 78
00
02
08 77
00
02
72 70
00
12
69
00 05
83 71
00 00
72 491
00
12
23 59
00
14
77 31
00 08
49 43
00 00
52 528
00 01
80 32
00
03
34 34
00
01
03 35
00 07
19 16
01
00
70 15
00 28
38 531
00 00
30 14
00
00
29 6
00
17
59 4
00 00
35 5
00
17
44 1
00 02
84 जएराट
2025
00 14
54 2104
14
2288
57
2014
00 01
81
2015
00 .11
69
2013
00 03
03
2002
00 07
15
2003
00
03
70
2004
00
01
25
2001
00 07
69
[ PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 2
3
4
5 1892
00 02
11 1897
00 06
33 1893
00
00
10 2305
00
00
44 1896
00
04
54 1903
00
03
x) 1895
00
0 ]
04 2053
00
00
10 1905
00 01
65 2058
00
00
15 1904
00
00
81 2059
00
(0
81 1906
00
79
01
1907
00
81
00
1909
03
52 1908
00
(K)
91 1910
(0)
00
70 2306
20 1885
00
2307
00
01
21 1886
00
00
10 1920
00
01
82 1921
00
00
25 2057
01
32
00
1883
00
01
78 1884
00
03
2052
00 00
53 1882
il
00
56 1881
00
34 2200
00 10
05 2199
00
(X)
73 1851
00 05
30 1879
00 06
80 1854
00
01
25 1856
00 04
96 1855
00 02
47 2296
00 01
99 1756
00 01
67 2233
00
00
48 1759
00
00
10 1757
00
02
30 2231
00 02
00 2232
00 01
21 4755
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7, 2010/श्रावण 16, 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
===
1
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
30
00
00
488
ब्राह्मणिपाल
80
02
00
1758
जएराट
63
00 11
1751
81
00
00
1750
71
03
00
1754
16
00
00
1753
64
06
00
1747
10
01
00
1744
20
00
00
1559
40
07
00
1560
91
00
00
1571
85
00 04
1570
55
00
00
1561
29
00
00
1569
10
00
00
1568
37
04
00
1566
35
02
00
1565
बरपसि
82
00
00
1594
38
06
00
1595
84
03
00
1641
79
00 03
487
15
01
00
486
10
00 00
466
94
14
00
463
64
00
00
464
85
00
00
470
47
00 13
461
28
06
00
460
85
02
00
457
14
05
00
456
78
00
00
744
88
01
00
770
24
04
00
454
55
03
00
779
70
03
00
654
50
03
00
166
07
05
00
153
95
01
00
152
52
01
00
850
चरिआमाल
66
1640
53
06
00
1601
05
07
00
1639
58
07
00
1638
30
01
00
1637
10
(0) 00
1622
99
00 04
1629
41
05
00
1632
74
03
00
1631
28
06
00
1630
88
16
00
1605
10
00 01
1606
02
06
00
2277
93
00 11
1604
56
03
00
1603
44
00
00
27
84
14
00
26
88
00
00
30
12
00
00
31
78
01
00
6
79
00 27
25
60
00 01
2220
53
19
00
24
20
00
00
5
2904 G1/2010-10
07
08
00
657
69
02
00
668
38
01
00
667
31
00
00
669
27
02
00
861
40
06
00
676
23
03
00
677
00
00 02
685
65
00
00
684
00
02
00
686
27
01
00
687
12
02
00
690
55
00
00
688
62
01
00
689
35
00
00
699
22
00
00
691
54
01
00
681
40
05
00
700
67
04
00
701
22
00
00
706
37
01
00
707
79
02
00
634
12
00
00
708 4756
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
[PART 11-- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 2
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 1
3
09
00
68 00
12
04
55
चटिआमाल
628
देबाधिपडा
01
46
00
19 00
17
60 629
00
00
00 630
51
16
10 00
627
00
00
10
05
99
18
00
4
29
00
10 626
00 00
00
29
625
00
267
00. 03
02
41 556
03
35
10
00
20 00
00 00
557
00
72
[सं. आर-25011 / 18/2010-ओ. आर. -1 ] 00
558
33
02
बी. के. दत्ता , अवर सचिव 00 00
555
10
New Delhi , the 29th July, 2010 00 04
19
554
88
00
05
559
00
03
62
463
462
00
00
95
00
464
04
03
00
02
465
98
S.O. 1939.-Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Orissa) to Raipur ( Chhattisgarh) & Ranchi ( Jharkhand) , a "Paradip- Sambalpur -Raipur- Ranchi Pipeline" should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
466
00
00
64
468
00 04
92
00
64
02
863
And whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land described in the schedule annexed to this notification ;
01
86
10
15
00
1
03
60'
00 02
60
देबाधिपडा
119
00
00
118
10
74
00
120
02
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
00 03
74
121
00
07
75
136
05
00
84
135
123
00 10
62
63
310
00 03
00
132
03
82
01
131
00
77
00 16
95
143
00
144
00
70
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of this notification, as published in theGazette of India , are made available to the General Public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Sukanta Kumar Pradhan , Competent Authority , Indian Oil Corporation Limited , Paradip -Sambalpur Raipur - Ranchi Pipeline Project , 1295 , Forest Park, Bhubaneswar- 751 009 , (Orissa).
08
145
00
97
SCHEDULE
00
231
03
14
00 01
182
11
Tehsil : Kishorenagar District : Angul State : Orissa Name ofthe
PlotNo.
Area
14
142
75
00
39 Village
297
Sq. Mtr .
Hectare Are 298
00
89
2
1
4
5
3 156
68
00 21
00
1241
02
Jamunali
14
08
00 02
155
1228
64
00 20 372
00 03
33
00
1234
09
52 154
00 04
90
1233
00 20
80
50
152
00 15 153
00 02
52
1232
55 370
00 04
80
41
1229
00 02 00
11
49
01
1230
00 02
84 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1
3
4
5
2
1
4757
5
4
2
3
23
00 03
146
Badahula
47
00 46
1231
Jamunali
26
22
00
1184
50
00 00
1183
63
00 09
4
Parbatipur
90
00 37
5
66.
21
00
358
00
33
44
12
13
00 26
390
62
25
00
402
44
00
10
400
07
80
00
2
84
15
00
399
60
00
09
398
00
14
10
407
87
00 03
396
81
37
00
689
Kadalimunda
27
02
00
688
20
39
00
839
00
34
21
838
75
40
615
00
74
26
00
614
00
90
00
653
10
00
00
840
16
00 10
954
00 03
78 599
02
98
00
582
00
01
43 760
14
55
00
581
761
00 03
88
08
79 575
00
09
87 576
00
00
97 949
00
00
05
01
771
41
578
00 43
19
13
00
141
Badahula
00
79
10
1433
66
05
00
155
Baenda
01
00 04
153
00
10
00
1525
04
19
00
152
10 151
07
96 142
00
17
00
00
147
01
20
00
145
98
06
00
144
12
00 06
135
10
00
00
133
21
01
00
134
69
01
136
00
13
00 01
101
35
02
00
100
03
47
00
99
93
01
00
98
00
64
00
97
00
78
00
106
02
70
00
107
05
58
00
108
00
04
23 93
04
88
00
109
00
00
10 111
00
06
38
00
06
27
00
36
23
00 01
37
06
61
00
34
00 03
95 33
00
96 438
00.
66
00 02
30
72
08
00
29
71
00 00
28
36
04
27
00
10
00
00
26
46
09
00
21
00
00
33 22
86
00 08
16
00
32
00
1462
70
00 05
15
26
00
09
14
01
53
00
457
00
38
15
1428
00
12 2215
.00
22
00 04
2189
00
36
04
2190
00 04
50 2191
14
00
40 2192
00 03
11 2199
24
16
00
2200 4758
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
1
2
3
4
5
1 Baenda
2186
00 00
88 Baenda 2201
00 20
02 1948
00 08
76 2235
00 04
83 1946
00 ΟΙ
82 1947
00 01
93
1949
00 07
09
1943
00 05
85
1906
00 01
00
1903
84
1904
00 01
30
1905
00 01
60
1885
82
1886
00 02
72
1887
00 02
33
1883
20
1891
00 00
10
1879
57
1888
00 01
82
1878
35
1875
00 02
69
1876
00 02
34
1874
00 00
10
1869
00 00
37
1919
00 00
81
1918
00 00
10
1868
00 02
14
1920
00 00
89
1923
00 00
90
1925
00
01
13
1864
00 01
79
1863
00
00
96
1862
00 01
01
1926
00 03
73
1927
25
1923
00 00
90
1921
00
00
10
1922
00
00
10
1924
00 00
10
1932
00 00
10
1931
00
00
73
1930
00
00
22
1929
00 04
32
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2
3
4
5 1928
00 01
28 1838
00 02
27 1939
00 00
55 1840
00 00
15 1841
00 01
51 1836
00 01
45 1835
00 02
00 1933
00 00
10 964
00 01
76 963
00 00
82 962
00 ΟΙ
83 966
00
00
45 968
00 02
06 961
00 01
79 969
00 03
93 960
00 00
93 3657
00 00
51 959
00 03
92 956
00 00
72 955
00 01.
12 954
00 00
55 289
00 03
9% 288
00 02
83. 290
00
01
30 287
00
03
72 280
00 03
22 286
00 01
05 279
00
07
94 278
00 14
35 277
00 00
99 174
00
01
62 172
00 01
38 3488
00 00
43 159
00
00
10 173
00 04
56 170
00
00
10 169
00 00
10 94
00 00
10 93
00
00
10 92
00
07
77 91
00 07
45 90
00 05
79 89
00
08
48 भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 7, 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1
5
4
3
2
1
Solanda
94
16
00
86
Baenda
27
00
00
3573
60
01
00
3617
07
11
00
3615
71
10
00
102
30
02
00
3578
45
00
00
82
84
01
00
3669
99
05
00
75
45
00
00
82
10
00
00
76
80
09
00
78
20
00
00
Π
29
20
00
72
15
09
00
65
04
05
00
63
36
00 02
62
51
06
00
57
56
03
00
56
47
06
00
55
10
00
00
54
09
17
00
41
84
01
00
3779
36
15
00
36
79
00
00
3611
43
00 00
37
48
05
00
3612
13
04
00
3613
91
03
00
2168
Solanda
90
05
00
1283
88
02
4759
5
4
3
2
43
02
00
1328
71
01
00
1357
15
02
00
1327
66
02
00
1326
94
00
00
1321
31
04
00
1320
29
06
00
1315
15
00
00
1313
20
10
00
1314
40
10
00
1311
10
00
00
2450
16
11
00
1295
84
03
00
1310
40
00
00
1297
91
00
00
1308
98
02
00
1309
09
02
00
1306
16
00
00
1305
82
07
00
2239
90
03
00
1206
57
07
00
1207
10
00 35
1208
19
04
.00
1234
82
00 02
1229
82
04
00
1231
72
00
00
1223
64
04
00
1233
83
08
00
1222
30
21
00
1221
80
01
00
1235
85
01
00
2969
Luhamunda
00
1284
30
01
00
1344
90
04
00
1343
59
03
00
1342
68
02
00
1341
70
00
00
1350
10
00
00
1351
15
00 03
1340
54
1352
10
00 04
1339
79
01
00
1337
20
00 01
1338
56
00
00
1336
54
07
00
2968
18
07
00
2967
15
00
00
2983
88
09
00
2962
39
00
00
2984
32
04
00
2961
82
04
00
2960
36
11
00
2959
84
11
00
2947
28
16
00
2946
25
04
00
2994
34
03
00
2995 4760
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2010/ SHRAVANA 16, 1932
[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)] 1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5 Luhamunda
2996
00 02
61 Baninali
824
00 08 2999
44 00 05
16
823
00 01
26 3000
00
00
46
1087
49 2944
00 01
73
829
00 00
10 2943
00 26
817
55
00 00
91 2942
00 09
85
816
00 13
41 2933
00 01
815
52
00 08
73 3011
00 01
803
10
00 14
25 3016
00
39
802
52
00 02
08 2908
00 07
804
87
00 02
95 2907
805
10
00 01
35 2906
00 05
793
26
00
00
82 5118
00 04
806
80
00 01
66 2909
785
43
00 09
47 5119
00
784
01
62
00 03
68 2910
00
791
06
00
85
00
20 2911
00
787
05
00
73
05
84 Baninali 868
747
00 00
00
16
01
19 866
748
00 08
00
02
88
26 867
749
00 ΟΙ
00 03
42
89 1104
750
00 00 03
01
19
62 864
736
00 00 03
04
35
43
740
875
00
00 03
01
79
79 874
741
00 01 00 09
51
11
742
879
00
00 00 09
19
62
739
885
00
00 00 01
17
81
738
882
00
00
00 02
10
46
743
883
00 00 00 10
61
41
721
1120
00 01
43
10
1161
719
00 01
00 00
27
89 892
720
00
00
08
00
07
58 893
718
00
00 02
00
83
75
713
894
00
00 00 03
55
42
712
1082
00 01
60
30
711
841
00
00 01
01
04
45
706
840
00
00 00 02
51
52
707
839
00 01 00 08
90
45
708
837
00
00 00
68 02
23
1128
00
836
19
38 00 03
61
758
00
835
02 00
76 18
97
759
00
06 826
26 00 06
89
793
00
00 827
16 00 01
29
760
00 07 825
56 00 00
83
761
00
02
20 भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
1
4
5
3
2
1
25
02
00
4761
5
4
3
2
92
00 03
3164
Papasara
3586
Papasara
95
00
00
3575
43
01
00
3585
01
03
00
3578
83
04
00
3577
36
03
00
3576
87
00 09
3572
92
00 02
3571
67
05
00
3573
03
34
00
3517
08
01
00
3539
26
00 02
3520
87
00 03
3527
44
00 10
3526
29
00 01
3528
70
00 02
4059
92
04
00
3524
18
07
00
3525
10
00
00
3386
11
00 08
3398
09
85
00
3397
55
11
00
3396
96
04
00
3387
45
00 12
3395
74
00 05
3392
20
00 08
3394
04
84
00
3393
23
00 10
3322
09
64
00
3319
10
00
00
3324
61
12
00
3312
54
00 01
3313
95
00 01
3314
66
00 02
3311
60
00 02
3310
20
00 02
3155
10 3154
00
45
00
4103
44
05
00
3156
10
00 02
3157
30 3158
41
00 03
3163
83
02
00
3162
00
00 02
3165
76
00
00
3229
84
00 08
3166
10
00
00
3167
99
00 02
3172
02
00
00
3173
78
04
00
3174
69
01
00
3175
66
01
00
3176
47
01
00
3177
42
00 03
3185
60
00
02
3186
47
00 09
3188
21
01
00
3187
13
01
00
3189
00
23
00
3193
08
01
00
3191
83
00 02
3190
98
01
00
3117
35
00 02
2613
12
00
10
2685
10
00
00
2686
60
06
00
2683.
61
00
00
2682
41
01
90
2681
91
01
00
2691
94
04
00
2680
01
55
00
2679
16
00 00
2677
06
97
00
2678
32
00
00
2676
79
03
00
1102
91
07
00
1097
05
03
00
1096
84
00 00
4189
73
01
00
1093
98
04
00
1090
65
00 07
1091
96
00 02
1086
33
02
00
1085
88
00 03
1083
40
05
00
1082
10
00 00
1079
05
00 04
1081 4762
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
4
1
2
3
5
1
00
1080
00
63
Papasara
Kataranga
10
00
982
05
10
976
00 00
977
00
00
87
00
978
00
979
00 00
87
00
20
980
03
981
89
915
00 04
22
00
4152
02
11
919
10
914
00 01
12
913
00 02
52
912
00 00
40
00
899
03
38
900
00 00
52
00 00
911
10
910
00 01
62
00 00
902
30
909
00 01
31
903
00 00
39
904
00 00
67
908
00
34
01
905
00 01
47
907
00 02
02
906
00 01
62
882
00
97
03
858
08
58
00
00
878
08
63
877
00 03
1:3
875
00 02
39
876
03
00
38
869
10
871
00 02
88
872
04
00
79
401
00 02
00
400
00
00
73
398
00 02
40
00 01
397
79
396
00 00
10
1293
00 06
35
Kataranga
1292
00 01
60
Krushnapur 1285
62
00 08
1284
00 01
64
1283
00 07
81
00 00
1282
13
[PART II- SEC . 3( ii) ] 2
3
4
5
00
1277
10
88
00
00
1278
10 1276
00
00
58 1266
06
00
01 1265
00 01
20 1264
00 01
13 1263
00 03
54 1257
03
00
07 1258
02
00
47 1256
81
00 00
1255
00 05
53 1254
00
36
02
00
1102
00
86
47 1113
00
00
1247
00 05
74 1246
00 04
85 1114
00 06
49
00
1116
02
02 1117
00 00
84 1118
00 00
80 913
00 00
90 912
00 09
23 1119
00 00
10 1121
00 03
18 1122
00 03
06 1125
00 05
86
00
1128
01
82 1129
00 01
85 1130
00 05
10 1134
00 05
73 1135
06
00
04 1137
00 07
45 1138
00 03
96 1140
00 15
91 1145
00 14
56 1152
00
00
90 1154
00
22
58 1156
00
12
15 925
00 14
02 1041
00 03
50 926
00 00
70 927
00 04
09 928
00 08
27 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3(ii ) ]
5
2
3
4
1 1
33
929
00 03
Krushnapur
Krushnapur
69
00 09
930
00
10
01
933
00
30
934
02
83
00 01
970
33
00 08
969
62
11
968
00
10
00 00
967
29
00 07
972
36
00 01
1176
00
10
73
975
04
15
00
1177
00
00
10
1180
00 06
94
978
84
00 01
976
72
977
00 02
00
07
19
451
00 06
61
446
Ambamunda
82
00 02
445
85
09
444
00
00
29
00
443
00 07
93
437
70
426
00 05
32
00 07
427
00
00
10
1102
96
428
00 02
49
432
00 02
429
34
08
73
00
430
00 03
73
415
28
409
00 01
00
07
27
410
414
00 00
15
00
01
59
407
00 07
92
411
316
00 04
78
00
58
315
02
00
00
69
317
46
319
00 10
01
00
314
82
72
00 06
313
38
312
00 02
Gadeimunda
00
10
00
311
90
00
05
324
00
11
323
00
00 00
10
322
2904 G1/2010-11
4763
4
5 2
3
00
70 335
07
17
00 05
336
68
00 01
333
48
13
337
00
42
08
00
339
62
00 12
349
00
64
00
348
00 18
12 341
00
70 44
01
57 43
00 19
42
00 00
10
00
02
12 31
00 06
73 32
00 08
47 33
00
33 1173
01
00 04
21 34
00 04
60 36
67
00 00
10
00
00
79 68
00
71
01
25
67
00. 01
70
04
60
00
69
00
49
03
00
88
03
51
00 29
50 77
00
00
94 35
34
00 01
53
00
62
18
33
00 01
05 28
00 00
70 32
05
00
60
60
08
30
00
958
00 00
81
45 29
00
12
00
40 26
05
95
00 13
21
96
00 02
22
58
00
19
13
18
00 01
18
57
00 17
640
00
55
00
630
00 02
17 632
75 414
00 05
10
00
415
00 4764
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 /SHRAVANA 16, 1932
1
2
3
4
1
5
633
00 01
Gadeimunda
06 Gadeimunda 413
00 02
83
412
00
79
02
1615
00
33
00
27
402
00 03
00 01
19
409
00
10
408
00
00 04
403
81
404
00 02
74
405
00 02
24
00
397
07
60
423
00 00
73
373
00 00
81
424
09
00
06
426
00 03
86
425
00 02
83
427
00 03
13
360
00 00
44
359
00 03
24
358
00 03
90
00
60
73
03
72
00 03
20
00
68
00
10
67
00 00
44
71
00 03
93
74
00 01
62
70
00 02
81
75
00 02
25
78
00 02
01
79
00 03
60
293
00 05
40
83
00 01
25
85
00
03
79
86
00
00
84
88
00
04
93
87
00
06
62
93
02
00
79
94
00 01
40
95
00
41
00
205
00 02
46
204
00 07
21
96
00 04
03
199
00 06
42
202
00
00
10
[PART II-SEC. 3( ii )] 2
5
3
4
03
198
00
36 184
00 13
03
00
00
10 200
00 00
10 201
182
00 03
93
00
181
74
03
177
00 11
36
00
180
00
83 178
00 01
96 169
04
00
35
00 00
20 1549
05
168
00
52
00
1548
10
00
167
00 02
51 245
00
00
25 166
00 05
19 164
01
82
00
1639
00
03
52 165
00
90
02
598
04
00
15 625
01
00
55 624
00
02
24
01
97 599
00
600
00 00
18 603
00 24
93 572
00 13
79
00
571
00
14 663
04
00
31 604
00 02
74 570
00 09
80 569
16
00
56 642
00 00
10
00
566
11
44
00
567
00
10 565
00 06
65 564
02
00
11
14
522
00
39 523
00 01
62 524
02
00
40 525
20
00 00
516
06
00
46 515
00 0!
00 514
00 07
82 भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 7, 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4
1 2
3
5
1
Parashumala
00
96
00
513
Khalapal
10
00
00
502
03
66
00
472
06
00 05
473
00
10
00
475
02
08
00
474
05
00
49
408
00
10
35
409
97
399
00 04
42
398
79
00 02
397
48
04
00
396
Raghunathapur
68
00 01
411
03
73
00
394
00
18
01
390
00 05
92
392
00
23
00
391
00 02
58
369
39
00 03
364
38
363
08
00
17
12
00
362
05
19
00
359
11
00
00
358
00
20
00
61
Parashumala
00
88
10
59
00 00
10
60
11
00 00
1525
04
72
00
56
01
54
00
1582
00 02
75
85
03
00 30
86
00
99
10
113
16
00 14
106
42
00 02
107
00
30
02
111
23
02
00
110
20
00
00
109
81
00 12
128
52
00 11
130
10
131
00
10
00
132
00
22
00
173
74
03
00
138
54
04
00
140
4765
4
5
3
2
91
00
139
02
42 144
00 05
15
00 07
165
36
00
167
00
74
05
00
166
90
00
00
357
02
61
00
1576
84
00 (2
358
20
00 00
356
00
92
03
359
90
01
00
371
10
00
372
00
23
00 04
691
75
00 08
692
33
00 02
693
81
02
00
787
00
70
00
695
94
00 04
710
95
00 03
711
35
00 00
709
87
00 03
712
00
04
06
683
21
00
728
08
10
00 00
725
00
04
33 730
28
00
01
727
37
00 05
731
15
00
671
00
05
39
00
668
94 669
00 03
10
00
00
670
16
04
658
00
40
11
00
664
04
94
00
659
85
00 02
651
07
00
02
649
89
00 03
653
70
03
818
00
07
00
583
04
00
02
10 584
00 05
22 577
91
00 07
575
07
22
574
00
10
00
00
587
70
15
00
572 4766
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
4
1
5
3
2
1
Kurumtapa
02
00 02
571
Raghunathapur
98
00 04
570
39
00
00
568
33
00
710
Kurumtapa
05
91
00
709
63
00 00
708
45
00 07
712
70
10
00
713
53
00 09
716
75
00
00
717
35
00 04
723
32
00 05
706
06
00 02
705
59
00 00
704
83
00 03
703
00 04
55
702
11
06
00
701
45
00
00
698
01
92
00
697
29
693
97
02
00
696
33
00 07
694
35
08
00
687
70
00 02
688
33
00 03
678
29
01
677
00
08
00 02
676
10
00
675
00
04
10
00
667
08
08
00
640
93
639
00 13
34
00 08
637
99
03
00
590
Turura
26
00
596
91
00
00
595
10
22
00
594
95
00 00
593
16
00 00
592
18
00 06
565
10
00 00
567
75
14
00
561
34
00 05
550
95
07
00
556
81
04
00
554
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
4
5
3
2
10
00 03
467
43
03
00-
466
18
01
00
469
21
05
00
465
00
40
02
454
96
00
00
455
00
50
00
453
05
00
48 457
01
96
00
458
65
00 00
459
28
01
00
450
76
04
461
05
Π 388
82
07
00
371
79
00
2026
49
02
382
84
20
19
06
352
10
00
344
46
03
343
86
00 13
338
00
10
00
379
67
02
00
92
06
93
00
91
00
61
00
90
91
00 02
89
97
04
00
88
59
02
00
72
67
00
01
73
00
61
00
87
04
29
00
74
26
00 04
75
53
00 05
76
68
00 07
560
10
00
00
569
10
00
00
568
00 00
566
93
00 02
567
42
00 01
564
23
00 06
565
26
00
572
06
95
00
563
56
00 13
547
29
03
00
3102 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
1
4
5
3
2
1
Turura
57
00
00
599
Turura
36
04
00
598
10
07
00
3103
96
04
00
604
04
04
00
605
24
00 03
507
73
00
00
506
4767
4
5
3
2
49
02
00
68
09
01
00
41
23
00
00
39
08
02
00
40
34
26
00
29
97
05
00
30
71
04
00
31
62
01
00
592
Kandaramunda
91
00
00
505
69
01
00
504
78
05
00
503
28
17
00
531
10
00
00
636
21
01
00
633
85
00
00
634
91
01
00'
632
10
00
00
460
14
461
66
01
00
3205
60
04
00
468
40
02
00
469
33
01
00
470
60
02
00
467
17
02
00
465
40
00 02
466
86
12
00
310
04
00 03
293
89
00 04
292
37
00
00
297
95
291
75
06
00
290
86
00 02
298
54
00 01
76
15
03
00
289
53
00
00
09
09
00
78
05
03
00
286
18
08
00
79
80
04
00
80
57
01
00
3277
94
02
00
82
60
05
00
83
61
00
00
84
25
04
00
85
16
00 05
69
29
03
00
86
82
06'
00
70
41
11
00
593
94
01
00
904
16
02
00
725
09
03
00
724
06
07
00
713
22
00 05
712
74
00
00
709
69
01
00
711
42
00 00
710
09
08
00
594
10
00
00
707
04
02
00
704
00
32
00
703
83
01
00
595
47
04
00
597
41
02
00
596
14
02
00
561
81
04
00
560
10
00
00
558
56
00 03
559
92
02
00
562
10
00
00
566
56
04
00
569
17
00 01
568
71
06
00
573
75
00
00
570
71
02
00
571
02
02
00
572
08
01
00
577
20
02
00
574
72
00 02
575
58
00
00
576
81
06
00
473
33
00 00
474
12
00 02
461
10
01
00
436
50
00
00
435
95
07
00
437
46
00
00
438
81
00
00
875 4768
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
2
3
4
5
1 1
00
18
Kandaramunda 439
04
Budulimunda 441
00 01
21
440
00
01
17
00
418
00
10
06
446
00
82
00
887
00
81
416
00
00
10
02
415
00
02
00
01
398
27
06
414
00
04
401
00 02
68
00 00
400
48
38
410
00 00
402
00 04
81
00 01
44
404
00 01
89
408
00 05
403
26
00
384
00
10
01
409
00
72
365
00 20
78
380
00
01
23
848
00
41
02
00
366
00
10
368
00 02
23
367
00 16
74
76
00 05
Mahulamunda
89
77
00 27
48
103
20
00 03
00
01
107
58 Rasunapala 80
00
00
10
87
00
00
10
88
00
24
09
27
00 00
73
00
67
29
00
26
00 11
62
90
00
00
10
24
00 05
17
00
118
17
55
22
00 07
21
05
35
00
14
Budulimunda
1993
00 18
99
01
34
00
87
04
33
00
53
[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]
4
2
3
5
00 01
32
20 25
00 07
15 26
00
00
50 22
00 09
69 1916
00
37
03
15
06
00
32 16
00
02
59 14
00
00
10 12
00
00
54 1915
01
00.
62 13
00 01
91 7
05
00
80 11
00 00
37 8
00 00
22 1913
02
00
88 4
00 07
14 3
04
00
29 1912
00 02
91 5
00
00
24 1041
00 02
39 1040
00 28
12 1202
00 00
12
06
1036
00
20
01 1035
00 07
1037
00
33
14
00 00
1038
64
00
927
00
93 926
00
65
04
430
00 04
60 342
00 44
70 45
00
77
51
00
16
48
79 47
00 02
76 49
07
00
51 50
00 02
43 455
00 02
55 51
00 07
45 486
00 10
47
01
488
00
66 30
00 17
85
00
27
49
13
445
00
23
02
31
00 09
10 भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1
4
3
5
2
00 07
79
38
Gadaghumura Rasunapala
00 20
40
33
83
51
00
467
Khaudar
70
00 18
468
00 16
87
305
07
53
00
304
61
03
00
303
00 00
10
302
16
01
00
301
10
00
00
300
06
00
10
299
46
00 02
297
00
17
00
397
Jharaberani
00
38
00
291
48
07
00
241
10
00
00
243
10
47
00
242
30
04
00
461
92
14
00
87
05
01
00
88
15
00 02
430
10
82
70
06
00
83
95
00
00
278
05
00 01
689
Gadaghumura
35
00 02
376
42
374
37
00 01
659
38
00 03
375
10
00
00
156
00
89
00
155
79
00 01
158
02
64
00
159
10'
154
03
02
00
160
00
10.
00
153
00 05
15
161
39
00 04
146
58
01
00
132
13
00 01
145
85
04
00
133
12
00 01
136
27
00 01
135
4769
4
5
3
2
08
58
00
134
04
00
98 70
67
00 01
72
25
00 06
71
21
00 04
63
00
16
14
43
93
00 02
44
79
00 03
42
12
19
00
40
92
00
00
559
00
81
00
38
00 00
89 37
10
00
00
36
10
00
00
144
36
00
00
143
58
04
00
142
98
00 01
141
00
74
02
140
02
42
00
1302
04
19
00
135
10
00
00
134
85
01
00
136
88
00 02
137
73
02
00
130
40
00
00
129
07
04
00
127
75
00 21
121
25
00 04
120
20
00
00
119
05
88
00
82
30
06
00
83
00
20
00
117
00
20
00
116
20
00 00
115
64
00 04
84
54
00 02
85
99
00 01
87
02
00 01
113
10
00 00
88
40
00 04
111
42
00 02
110
10
84
00
109
39
00
00
1274
04
00
108 4770
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
1
2
3
5
1
4
79
107
00
Jharaberan
02
Jharaberani
20
106
00 04
103
00 04
43
07
102
00
70
00
101
00
10
99
00 04
04
100
00
00
49
1240
00 04
04
98
00
00
94
1241
00 01
05
344
00 04
55
345
00 03
59
00 00
1213
26
00
00
38
69
Ghosar 37
00
20
00
35
00 00
15
04
346
44
00
00 01
351
48
33
00 00
10
347
00 01
62
350
00 00
74
348
06
00
06
04
00
349
68
506
00 05
83
507
02
00
70
25
00
00
40
508
00 02
09
02
505
00
61
509
00 02
91
512
00 01
19
511
00 03
03
510
00 03
23
514
00
29
08
13
515
00
31
516
00 03
62
517
00
63
05
518
00
75
02
532
00 10
22
531
35
00 03
533
00 01
29
534
00 00
33
535
00
18
35
00
536
38
02
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2
4
3
5 537
00 00
31 564
00
00
10 569
00 29
48
00
567
00
10 568
00 02
20 576
00 02
62 575
00 02
49
00
1223
02
10 573
00 01
03 1261
00 08
79
00
570
00
10
00
00
1234
57
00
974
01
55 2954
00 01
76 2970
00 00
45 2971
00 02
31 2973
00
24
47 2976
00 08
75 2975
00 01
20 2980
45
00 44
00
2983
07
70
19
2982
00
63 3005
00 08
04 3028
00 00
30 3027
00
04
20
00 01
3794
79 3025
00 05
57 3026
05
00
58 3024
00 01
86 3066
00
72
05
3064
00
05
64 3065
41
00 01
3063
00 01
62 3068
00 04
70 3067
00 03
11 3060
00 00
10 3069
00 02
47 3070
00
04
56 3071
00
00
46 3072
00 02
83 3075
00
00
10 3092
00 01
16 3073
00 05
37 4771
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 7, 2010/श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
1
5
4
3
2
1
Ghosar
53
00
00
3074
Ghosar
05
05
00
3091
09
03
00
3104
73
02
00
3103
33
00
00
3102
72
02
00
3704
43
06
00
3112
42
04
00
3111
30
02
00
3150
45
03
00'
3151
26
03
00
3155
49
04
00
3156
10
00
00
3168
40 1871
14
02
00
1870
57
01
00
1869
08
56
00
1877
81 1881
50
00
00
1880
27
05
00
1879
10
00
00
1900
60
00 01
1901
10
00
00
1863
51
05
00
1902
29
00
.00
1841
45
00 06
1903
10
00
00
1907
31
00
00
1906
58
00 04
1905
44 1904
91
00 02
1840
00
27
00
1834
10
02
00
1839
76
03
00
1835
48
00 02
1836
30
08
00
1812
10
00
00
1832
37 1816
34
00
00
1806
10 1814
72
05
00
1813
10
00
00
1759
08
01
00
1805
2904 GI /2010-12
5
4
3
2
10
05
00
1760
33
00
00
1804
94
03
00
1761
49
00 02
1758
91
02
00
1763
22
00 02
1764
05
00 02
1754
17
00
00
1765
78
03
00
1766
14
00 00
1767
07
03
00
1768
85
00
00
1770
14
03
00
1769
58
00
00
1640
22
00
00
1664
13
00 03
1658
14
02
00
1657
84
00 02
1656
10
00
00
1650
69
01
00
1651
69
04
00
1652.
42
01
00
1653
10
00
00
1645
38
01
00
1647
35
02
00
1646
47
05
00
1618
23
00
00
1617
33
03
00
1619
81
.01
00
1621
13
00
00
1620
62
00
00
1622
10
00
00
1603
80
01
00
1602
20
00
00
1592
60
04
00
1601
28
00 01
1600
10
00
00
1594
13
00 03
1595
48
00
00
1596
68
03
00
1581
100
00
1580
43
G
841
10
00
00
1582 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
4772
1
4
5
3
2
1
Ghosar
14
00 02
634
Ghosar
10
00
00
640
10
00
00
635
36
03
00
639
01
36
00
638
78
02
00
643
10
00
00
644
20
00 03
642
16
00 00
837
42
00 02
828
00
10 826
00
41
00
00
836
04
04
00
829
00
00 01
832
09
00 01
830
00
60
03
831
00
29
00
3788
00 00
10 822
66
04
00
823
10
00
00
817
04
02
00
816
55
00
00
815
96
00 02
812
01
21
00
813
83
00 00
811
08
04
00
810
75
01
00
800
00 00
10 801
93
01
00
809
47
00 06
808
32
00
00
3787
24 807
10 935
00
81
00
3786
80
00 03
806
00
20
00
936
00
00
10 941
06
19
00
775
82
00 04
774
01
69
00
773
00
00. 05
942
25
00 02
946
10
00
00
943
[PART 11--SEC . 3 (ii) ]
4
5
3
2
00 02
20 945
66
00 02
960
10
00 00
961
88
03
00
963
69
00 03
959
ΟΙ
03
00
958
26
06
00
965
53
05
00
966
53
01
00
967
01
22
00
1004
77
00 00
3873
10
00 00
3872
37
05
00
1005
00 03
96 1002
10
00
00
1003
02
43
00
1001
53
00 08
1000
88
00 01
999
95
00
00
996
31
00 07
998
01
00
19 1023
00
05
00
3760
36
01
00
992
71
03
00
1024
99
00 01
135
00
10
00
3759
89
00 06
134
12
03
00
129
00
43
04
130
65
04
00
132
10
00
110
00
00
74
Οι
111
12
00 03
113
14
00 08
131
83
00 03
120
02
41
00
119
00
02
92 118
03
01
00
3757
00 06
77 116
29
11
00
103
25
08
00
3889
00
00
10 3888
02
89 3659
00 4773 भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4
5
3
4
2
1
2
3
5
1
00
83
1009
00 00 03
33
53
Ghosar
Panduripathar
62
01
00
1144
25
00 05
54
00
$1
00
203
10
00
00
55
10
00
1209
00 00 06
12
58
00
21
01
1325
82
00 11
186
21
00 01
204
24
00 05
59
00
21
01
205
00
17
50
61
01
21
00
206
76
00 06
69
02
22
00
202
71
00 07
60
21
00 01
207
08
90
00
82
10
00
00
213
08
10
00
998
Panduripathar
00
10
00
214
35
00 02
555
00
30
00
1208
00 02
15
546
00
10
212
00 00 02
545
62
01
00
208
48
00 01
547
08
00 03
209
00 01
59
548
10
00 00
1081
53
00 08
549
20
85
00
163
25
00 00
544
06
00
98
91
164
00 03
542
10
00 00
1008
00 14
61
541
00
165
68
00 02
540
03
00 01
1241
95
01
00
566
10
00 00
24
1242
01
00
573
14
00 05
166
00
78
00
572
46
19
67
00
00
56
00
1165
17
02
68
54
00,
01
00
571
00
27
01
48
1003
00
00
592
48
00
02
73
00
56
00
570
21
00
04
70
01
595
00
18
00
70
71
09
39
00
00
596
67
00
30
38
91
00 03
599
00
76
03
1
00
00
10
604
28
64
536
00 00
01
76
Shribantamunda
602
00
83
01
284
43
02
00
601
00
99
02
285
00
10
00
600
84
00 02
44
540
00
622
02
47
279
00 09
86
01
623
00
61
00
00
505
10
00
626
02
52
17
00
278
98
625
04
00
89
280
01
00 03
640
00
05
02
132
47
00 06
242
01
84
00
131
52
00 01
243
03
02
00
130
00 01
18
1180 4774
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
1
2
3
4
5
1 129
00 09
Shribantamunda
32 Jayrat
00
128
00
13
05
00
127
04 125
00 02
40 126
00 08
87
00
10 556
00
91
03
00
39
00
534
00
92 92
00 03
91 89
00
03
54 533
00 00
28 527
00 01
35
00
93
25 94
00
56
00
82
00 12
24
03
79
00
84 78
00
02
08
00 02
72
00
70
12
77
00 05
83 69
71
00
00
72
12
00
491
23 59
00
14
77 31
00 08
49 43
00 00
52 528
00 01
80 32
00 03
34 34
03
00 01
35
00
07
19 16
70
00 01
15
00 28
38
00
30 14
29
17
00
59 4
00
00
35 5
00
44
00 02
84
00
14
54 2025
Jayrat
00 00
14 2104
2288
57
00 01
2014
81 2015
00
11
69 2013
00 03
03
[PART II- SEC: 3 ( ii) ] 2
3
4
5
00
2002
07
15
00
2003
03
70 2004
00 01
25 2001
00 07
69
00
1892
02
11 1897
00 06
33 1893
00
00
10 2305
00 00
44 1896
00
54
04
1903
03
00
29 1895
00
04
01
2053
00
10
Ol
1905
65
00
15 2058
1904
00
81 254
81
00
01
79
84
02
100%
03
52
00
94 1910
00
70 2300
00
20 1885
36
(2
2307
01
21
00
1886
00
10 1920
00 01
82
00
1921
00
25 2057
00 01
32 1883
00 01
78 1884
00 03
22 2052
00 00
53 1882
00
56
11
1881
00 02
34 2200
00
01
05 2199
00
00
73 1851
00
05
30 1879
06
00
80 1854
00 04
25 1856
00
04
96 1855
00
02
47 2296
00
ΟΙ
99 1756
00
67
01
2233
00
00
48
00
1759
00
10 1757
00 02
30
00
2231
02
00 भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
1
5
4
3
2
1
21
01
00
2232
Bramhanipal Jayrat
80
00 02
1758
63
11
00
1751
81
00 00
1750
71
03
00
1754
16
00
00
1753
64
06
00
1747
10
01
00
1744
20
1559
40
07
00
1560
91
00
00
1571
85
04
00
1570
55
00
00
1561
00
29
00
1569
00
10
00
1568
37
00 04
1566
4775
4
5
3
2
30
00 00
488
79
00 03
487
15
00 01
486
00
10
00
466
94
00 14
463
64
00
00
464
85
00
00
470
47
00 13
461
00 06
28 460
85
02
00
457
05
14
00
456
78
00
00
744
88
00 01
770
00 04
24 454
55
03
00
779.
70
03
00
654
50
03
00
166
Barapasi
35
00 02
1565
00
82
00
1594
38
06
00
Chatiamal 1595
84
00 03
1641
66
00
00
1640
53
06
00
1601
05
07
00
1639
58
00 07
1638
30
01
00
1637
10
1622
99
04
00
1629
41
05
00
1632
74
03
00
1631
28
00 06
1630
88
00 16
1605
10
01
00
1606
02
06
00
2277
00 11
93
1604
56
00 03
1603
00
44
00
27
84
00 14
26
00
88
00
30
12
31
78
00 01
6
79
00 27
25
60
00 01
2220
53
00 19
24
20'
00 00
5
07
00 05
153
95
00 01
152
01
52
00
850
07
08
657
00
69
02
00
668
01
38
00
667
00
31
00
669
27
00 02
861
06
40
00
676
23
00 03
677
02
00
00
685
00
65
00
684
00
02
00
686
27
00 01
687
00 02
12 690
00
55
00
688
62
00 01
689
00
35
00
699
00
00
22 691
00 01
54 681
40
00 05
700
04
67
00
701
00
22
00
706
01
37
00
707
02
79
00
634
00
00
12 708
00 09
55 628
46
01
00
629
00
51
00
630 4776
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 1
2
3
4
3
2
5
1
4
5
11
00 01
49
00
627
00
10
Chatiamal
Debadhipada
12
00 04
68 626
00 00
29
17
00 00 02
29
19
60 625
03
00 556
00
35
16
00
10
00
18
557
00
72
00
99
05 00
33
02
4
558
00 00
10
00
10
00
555
00 03
267
41
04
554
00
19
10
20 00 05
88
559
[No. R - 25011 / 18 / 2010 - OR - 1 ]
03
62
463
00
B. K. DATTA , Under Secy .
00
462
00
95
04
00
नई दिल्ली, 2 अगस्त, 2010 464
03
00
02
98
465
466
00 00
64
00
468
04
92
02
863
00
64
10
86
15
00 03
60
1
119
02
00
60
Debadhipada
118
00
00
10
00 02
74
120
03
00
121
74
07
75
00
136
135
00 05
84
का.आ. 1940. केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसमें इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं.का.आ. 2710 तारीख 23-9-2009, जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 3-10-2009 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गुजरात राज्य में वाडीनार संस्थापन से मध्य प्रदेश में बीना तक कच्चे पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए वाडीनार - बीना पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;
00
10
62
123
00
63
03
310
82
00
132
03
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 14-5-2010 से तारीख 5-6-2010 के दौरान उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;
00
01
77
131
95
00
143
16
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन, केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
00 00
70
144
00 08
97
145
03
14
00
231
00 01
182
11
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है ;
14
75
142
00
00
.00
39
297
00 01
298
89
00 21
68
156
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;
155
00 02
08
03
00
33
372
04
90
154
00
00
00
50
152
02
00
52
153
और केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
04
80
00
370 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
अनुसूची
तहसील -घोलका जिला-अहमदाबाद राज्य- गुजरात गांव का नाम सर्वे नंबर
क्षेत्रफल हेक्टयर में क्र. सं.
2
3
1
4 1 . कोठ
380 पैकी 3
00.1500 2.
34
00.0004 रूपगढ
खरांटी
3.
19
00.4638
00.0244
304
320
00.0559 4.
727
सीमेज
00.1250 5. पीसावाडा
954
00.0002 6.
46/4
00.1925 वीरपुर
00.0580
312
7. गीरंद
[फा. सं. आर-31015 /31/ 2009- ओ. आर- II ]
ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 2nd August , 2010 S.O. 1940. Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S. O. 2710 dated the 23-09-2009 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , published in the Gazette of India dated the 3-10-2009 the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land , specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of Crude Oil through Vadinar- Bina Crude Pipeline Project from Vadinar in the State of Gujarat to Bina in the State of Madhya Pradesh by Bharat OmanRefineries Limited;
And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public during 14-05-2010 to 5-6-2010;
And whereas the Competent Authority has , under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the Central Government ;
And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein;
Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said land , specified in the Schedule , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;
And further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central
4777
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
= Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of the publication of this declaration , in Bharat Oman Refineries Limited , free from all encumbrances .
SCHEDULE
Tehsil: Dholka District : Ahmedabad State : Gujarat
Area in Hectare Name of Village Survey No.
S.No.
4 1
3
2
Koth
380P 3
00.1500 1 .
2.
34
00.0004 Rupgadh
00.4638 Kharenti
19
3.
00.0244
304 320
00.0559 4.
00.1250
727
Simej
5. Piswada
954
6.
46/4
00.1925 Virpur
00.0580 7. Girand
312
[F. No. R-31015 /31 / 2009 - OR - II ] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy .
नई दिल्ली, 2 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 1941.-केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसमें इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं.का.आ. 2712 तारीख 23-9-2009 , जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 03-10-2009 में प्रकाशित की गई थी , द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में गुजरात राज्य में वाडीनार संस्थापन से मध्य प्रदेश में बीना तक कच्चे पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए वाडीनार - बीना पाइपलाइन परियोजना के माध्यम से भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 14-5-2010 से तारीख 26-5-2010 के दौरान उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन , केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात्, और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चिय किया है;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाता है ;
4778
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
और केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख को केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त, भारत ओमान रिफाइनरीज लिमिटेड में निहित होगा ।
अनुसूची
तहसील- नडीयाद जिला-खेड़ा राज्य- गुजरात क्र.सं. गांव का नाम सर्वे नंबर
क्षेत्रफल हेक्टयर में 1
2
3
4 पीज
1 .
860
00.1000
953
00.1729
1273
00.1316 2. पीपलाता
1231
00.0490
1272
00.2784
1308
00.2250 3. पीपलग
347
00.1250
658 पैकी
00.0250
350
00.0741
351
00.0360
650
00.0248 4.
1191/1 पैकी
नडीयाद
00.0797 5.
437
00.0744 सलुनतलपद
6. कंजोडा
692
00.0617
693
00.0345
616
00.0836
707
00.0449 7. चलाली
839
00.0859
192पैकी
00.0796 [फा. सं. आर-31015/35/2009- ओ.आर- II ]
ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 2nd August , 2010
S.O. 1941.- Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas number S. O. 2712 dated the 23-09-2009 , issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , published in the Gazette of India dated the 3-10-2009 the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land , specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for transportation of Crude Oil through Vadinar-
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Bina Crude Pipeline Project from Vadinar in the State of Gujarat to Bina in the State of Madhya Pradesh by Bharat Oman Refineries Limited ;
And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public during 14-5-2010 to 26-5-2010 ;
And whereas the Competent Authority has , under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , submitted report to the Central Government ;
And whereas the Central Government , after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline , has decided to acquire the right of user therein;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said land , specified in the Schedule , is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline ;
And further , in exercise of the powers conferredby sub - section ( 4 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall , instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest on the date of the publication of this declaration , in Bharat Oman Refineries Limited ,free from all encumbrances .
SCHEDULE
Tehsil : Nadiad District : Kheda State : Gujarat
Area in Hectare S.No. Name of Village Survey No.
2
3
4
00.1000 1. Pij
860 953
00.1729
1273
00.1316 2.
1231
00.0490 Piplata
1272
00.2784
1308
00.2250
00.1250 3. Piplag
658 P
00.0250
00.0741
00.0360
347 350 351 650
00.0248 4. Nadiad
1191 / 1P
00.0797 5.
437
00.0744 Saluntalpad
6.
00.0617 Kanjoda
00.0345
00.0836
692 693 616 707
00.0449 7.
Chalali
839
00.0859
192P
00.0796
[ F. No. R- 31015/35/ 2009 - OR - II ] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy .
4779
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7, 2010/श्रावण 16 , 1932
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
नई दिल्ली , 2 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 1942.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाईन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की नीचे दी गई अधिसूची में यथा उल्लिखित तारीखों की संख्या का. आ. द्वारा उन अधिसूचनाओं से संग्लन अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया था ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उक्त भूमियों में , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त उपयोग का अधिकार भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित किया था ।
और जबकि सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दी है कि मोटर स्प्रिंट, उच्च कोटि का मिट्टी का तेल और वेग डीजल के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड के मध्य प्रदेश राज्य स्थित मांग्लया संस्थापन से दिल्ली राज्य स्थित बिजवासन संस्थापन तक उपर्युक्त भूमियों में पाईपलाईन बिछाई जा चुकी है । चूंकि राजस्थान राज्य के जिला कोटा में पाईपलाईन बिछाई जा चुकी है , अतः ऐसी भूमि के बारे में जिसका विवरण इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची से विनिर्दिष्ट है प्रचालन समाप्त किया जाए;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाईन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1963 के नियम 4 के स्पष्टीकरण-1 के अधीन अपेक्षानुसार उक्त अनुसूची के स्तंभ 7 में उल्लिखित तारीखों को जिला कोटा, राजस्थान राज्य में प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख के रुप में घोषित करती है ।
अनुसूची
तहसील का.आ.नं. व तारीख
ग्राम का नाम
क्र. सं.
(2)
(3)
(4) (1)
4643-8-12-2005
गलाना
1.
लाडपुरा
कादीहेड़ा
लाडपुरा
लाडपुरा
जाखोड़ा
लाडपुरा
किशनपुरा (केथून)
लाडपुरा
गोदल्या हेड़ी
मोरपा
लाडपुरा
अरनियां
लाडपुरा
लाडपुरा
रसूलपुर
ताथेड़
लाडपुरा
लाडपुरा
बृजेशपुरा
पिपल्दाशेखान लाडपुरा
लाडपुरा
रामखेड़ली
नोटाना
लाडपुरा
चन्द्रेसल
लाडपुरा
देवली मच्छियान लाडपुरा
लाडपुरा
किशनपुरा उर्फ नयागांव
लाडपुरा
गावड़ी
2. 2917-26-7-2006
लाडपुरा
जाखोड़ा
गोदल्या हेड़ी लाडपुरा
नोटाना
3. 4827-12-12-2006
लाडपुरा
लाडपुरा
बृजेशपुरा
सांगोद 4. 4432-24-11-2005
धूलेट
सांगोद
चरचड़िया उर्फ काशीपुरा
सांगोद
लाढ़ोहेड़ा
2904 G1 /2010-13
राज्य
जिला
प्रचालन समाप्ति कीतारीख
(7)
(5)
(6)
कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
31-03-2007
राजस्थान
31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान
राजस्थान
कोटा
31-03-2007
31-03-2007
राजस्थान
कोटा
31-03-2007
राजस्थान
कोटा
कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान
कोटा
31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
31-03-2007 राजस्थान
कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 राजस्थान
कोटा
31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007
राजस्थान
कोटा
31-03-2007 राजस्थान
कोटा
31-03-2007 राजस्थान
कोटा
31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
31-03-2007
राजस्थान 4780
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVAΝΑ 16 , 1932
(1)
(3)
(4)
टोस्या
सांगोद
टोल्या
सांगोद
सांगोद
केशोली
सांगोद
बाछीहेड़ा
सारोला
सांगोद
सांगोद
मांडूहेड़ा
सांगोद
हिंगोनियां
सांगोद
खेड़ी
सांगोद
बिशनपुरा
सांगोद
गोपालपुरा
आँवा
सांगोद
सांगोद
राजपुरा मय चक
सांगोद
पिसाहेड़ा
ढीकोली
सांगोद
सांगोद
खड़ीपुर
सांगोद
खजूरी
बन्दा
सांगोद
सांगोद
कुराड़
सांगोद
बृजनगर
5. 2919-28-07-2006
सांगोद
धूलेट
आंवा
सांगोद
सांगोद
खड़ीपुर
सांगोद
खजूरी
सांगोद
कुराड़
6. 15-03-01-2007
सांगोद
माण्डूहेड़ा
सांगोद
खजूरी
बंदा
सांगोद
सांगोद
कुराड
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (5)
(6)
(7) कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
31-03-2007
राजस्थान
कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007
राजस्थान
कोटा
31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
31-03-2007
राजस्थान
कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
31-03-2007
राजस्थान
कोटा
31-03-2007
राजस्थान स्थान
कोरा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
31-03-2007 राजस्थान
कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 कोटा
राजस्थान 31-03-2007 [ फा. सं. आर- 31015/5/2009- ओ आर-11 ]
ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 2nd August , 2010
S.O. 1942. Whereas , by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas , S.O. Nos . and dates as mentioned in the Schedule below issued under sub - section ( i) of Section ( 6 ) , Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government acquired the Right of User in the said lands specified in the schedule appended to those notification.
And whereas , in exercise of powers conferred by sub - section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government vested the right of user in the lands free from all encumbrances in the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited .
And whereas , the Competent Authority has made a report to the Central Government that the pipeline for the purpose of transportation of motor sprit , Superior Kerosene Oil and High Speed Diesel from Manglya in the State of Madhya Pradesh to Bijwasan in the state of Delhi has been laid in the said lands and hence the operations may be terminated in District Kota in the state of Rajasthan in respect of the said lands which in brief are specified in the Schedule annexed to this Notification .
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4781 Now, therefore , as acquired under explanation 1 of Rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Rules 1963 , the Central Government hereby declares the dates mentioned in column 7 of the said schedule as the dates of termination in District Kota the State of Rajasthan .
SCHEDULE
Terasil
Name of village Sr. No.
S. O.No. and date
(4)
(3)
(1)
(2)
Galana
4643 Dated 8-12-2005
1.
Ladpura
Kadiheda
Ladpura
Jakhoda
Ladpura
Kishanpura ( kethun ) Ladpura
Ladpura
Godaliya hedi
Morpa
Ladpura
Arniya
Ladpura
Ladpura
Rasulpur
Tathed
Ladpura
Ladpura
Brajeshpura
Ladpura
Pipalda Shekhan
Ramkhedli
Ladpura
Notana
Ladpura
Chandresal Ladpura
Ladpura
Devlimachhiyan
Ladpura
Kishanpura urf Naya
GaonGavdi Ladpura
Jakhoda
2.
2917 Dated 26-7-2006
Ladpura
Ladpura
Godaliya hedi
Notana
3.
4827 Dated 12-12-2006
Ladpura
Ladpura
Brajeshpura
Dhulet
4.
Sangod 4432Dated 24-11-2005
Charchadiya urf Sangod
Kashipura
Lodhaheda
Sangod
Sangod
Tosya
Sangod
Tolya
Kesholi
Sangod
-Bachhiheda Sangod
Sarola
Sangod
Manduheda Sangod
Sangod
Hingoniya
Khedi
Sangod
Sangod
Bishanpura
Sangod
Gopalpura
Aanwa
Sangod
Sangod
Rajpura may chak
Pisaheda
Sangod
Dhikoli
Sangod
Sangod
Khadipur
District
State
Date of Termination
(6)
(7) (5)
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajastha
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007
Rajasthan 4782
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
(2)
(3)
(4) (1)
Sangod
Khajuri
Banda
Sangod
Kurad
Sangod
Sangod
Brijnagar
2919-28-07-2006
5.
Dhulet
Sangod
Aanwa
Sangod
Sangod
Khadipur
Khajuri
Sangod
Kurad
Sangod 6.
15-03-01-2007
Manduheda Sangod
Khajuri
Sangod
Banda
Sangod
Kurad
Sangod
[PART II -SFC . 3 ( ii) ]
(7)
(6)
(5)
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
Kota
Rajasthan 31-03-2007 Kota
31-03-2007 Rasthan
Kota
31-03-2007 Rajasthan
IF.NR- 316155 /2009 / OR - II ] A. GOSWAMI. Under Secy .
नई दिल्ली , 2 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 1943.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग कोन ) अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्रकामै मंत्रालय की नीचे दी गई अधिसूची में यथा उल्लिखित तारीखों की संख्या का. आ. द्वारा उन अधिसूचनाओं से संग्लन अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट अभि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया था।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उक्त भूमियों में , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त उपयोग का अधिकार भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित किया था।
और जबकि सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दी है कि मोटर स्प्रिट , उच्च कोटि का मिट्टी का तेल और वेग डीजल के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड के मध्य प्रदेश राज्य स्थित मांग्लया संस्थापन से दिल्ली राज्य स्थित बिजवासन संस्थापन तक उपर्युक्त भूमियों में पाइपलाइन बिछाई जा चुकी है । चूंकि राजस्थान राज्य के जिला बूंदी में पाइपलाइन बिछाई जा चुकी है , अतः ऐसी भूमि के बारे में जिसका विवरण इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची से विनिर्दिष्ट है प्रचालन समाप्त किया जाए:
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1963 के नियम 4 के स्पष्टीकरण -1 के अधीन अपेक्षानुसार उक्त अनुसूची के स्तंभ 7 में उल्लिखित तारीखों को जिला बूंदी , राजस्थान राज्य में प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख के रूप में घोषित करती है ।
अनुसूची
ग्राम का नाम
तहसील सं. का.आ.नं. व तारीख
क्र. सं.
(1)
(3)
(2)
(4) जिला
राज्य प्रचालन समाप्ति कीतारीख (5)
(6)
(7)
31-05-2007
केशवरायपाटन
पटालियः
1.
32-04-01-2000
ईश्वरनगर
राजस्थान
बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-05-2007
केशवरायपाटन
बूंदी
केशवरायपाटन
कस्बा कंशवराय
पाटन
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
बूंदी
केशवरायपाटन
राजस्थान 31-05-2007 बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-05-2007
केशवरायपाटन
हथनापुर
भीया
बूंदी
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
केशवरायपाटन
बूंदी
31-05-2007
केशवरायपाटन
रंगराजपुरा
अरनेठा
राजस्थान
बूंदी
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
केशवरायपाटन
बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-05-2007
केशवरायपाटन
श्रीपुरा
बूंदी भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
(1)
(4) (2)
(3)
सारसला
केशवरायपाटन
केशवरायपाटन
भावपुरा
अडीला केशवरायपाटन
कापरेन केशवरायपाटन
केशवरायपाटन
हीरापुर
गरजनी केशवरायपाटन
केशवरायपाटन
बालापुरा
केशवरायपाटन
अरनिया
अरडाना केशवरायपाटन
कोडक्या केशवरायपाटन
केशवरायपाटन
आजन्दा
2.
केशवरायपाटन 3488-29-08-2006
बालापुरा
पटोलिया केशवरायपाटन 387-05-02-2007
3.
4.
2668-28-7-2005
लबान
इन्द्रगढ़
इन्द्रगढ़
पापड़ी
बड़गाँव
इन्द्रगढ़
सखावदा
इन्द्रगढ़
इन्द्रगढ़
बिशनपुरा
इन्द्रगढ़
कँवरपुरा
इन्द्रगढ़
देवपुरा
इन्द्रगढ़
धाकड़खेड़ी
हरदेव गंज
इन्द्रगढ़
अंघोरा
इन्द्रगढ़
इन्द्रगढ़
सुनारी
नया गाँव
इन्द्रगढ़
इन्द्रगढ़
टोकसपुरा
रामनगर
इन्द्रगढ़
रामपुरिया
इन्द्रगढ़
इन्द्रगढ़
गुढ़ा
इन्द्रगढ़
बड़ाखेड़ा
रामनगर
इन्द्रगढ़ 1484-14-04-2006
5.
भाण्डगंवार
इन्द्रगढ़
इन्द्रगढ़
जाड़ला
6.
386-05-02-2007
अंघोरा
इन्द्रगढ़
हरदेव गंज
इन्द्रगढ़
भाण्डगंवार
इन्द्रगढ़
लबान
7.
2624-15-09-2008
इन्द्रगढ़ 8.
256-17-01-2006
इन्द्रगढ़
कोटा खुर्द
लबान
इन्द्रगढ़
इन्द्रगढ़
सुनारी
4783
(6)
(5)
(7)
राजस्थान 31-05-2007 बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-05-2007 बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-05-2007 बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-05-2007 बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-05-2007 बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-05-2007 बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-05-2007 बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-05-2007 बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-05-2007 बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-05-2007 बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-05-2007 बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-05-2007 बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-05-2007 बूंदी
राजस्थान 15-12-2008 बूंदी
राजस्थान 15-12-2008 बूंदी
15-12-2008 राजस्थान
बूंदी
15-12-2008 राजस्थान
बूंदी
15-12-2008 राजस्थान
बूंदी
15-12-2008 राजस्थान
बूंदी
15-12-2008 राजस्थान
बूंदी
15-12-2008 राजस्थान
बूंदी
राजस्थान 15-12-2008 बूंदी
राजस्थान 15-12-2008 बूंदी
15-12-2008 राजस्थान
बूंदी
15-12-2008 राजस्थान
बूंदी
राजस्थान 15-12-2008 बूंदी
15-12-2008 राजस्थान
बूंदी
15-12-2008 राजस्थान
बूंदी
15-12-2008 राजस्थान
बूंदी
राजस्थान 15-12-2008 बूंदी
राजस्थान 15-12-2008 बूंदी
15-12-2008 राजस्थान
बूंदी
राजस्थान 15-12-2008 बूंदी
राजस्थान 15-12-2008 बूंदी
राजस्थान 15-12-2008 बूंदी
15-12-2008 राजस्थान
बूंदी
15-12-2008 राजस्थान
बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-12-2006 बूंदी
31-12-2006 राजस्थान
बूंदी
31-12-2006 राजस्थान
बूंदी 4784
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16, 1932
(2)
(3)
(4) (1)
इन्द्रगढ़
जाड़ला
इन्द्रगढ़
बडाखेड़ा
9.
25717-01-2006
इन्द्रगढ़
बलदेवपुर
इन्द्रगढ़
कोटड़ी
घाट का बराना
इन्द्रगढ़
झपायता
इन्द्रगढ़
इन्द्रगढ़
देही खेड़ा
10.
3816-20-09-2006
घाट का बराना
इन्द्रगढ़
[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )] (5)
(6)
(7)
31-12-2006
राजस्थान
बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-12-2006 बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-12-2006 बूंदी
31-12-2006
राजस्थान
बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-12-2006 बूंदी
राजस्थान 31-12-2006 बूंदी
31-12-2006 बूंदी
राजस्थान
राजस्थान 31-12-2006 बूंदी
[फा. सं. आर- 31015/5/2009- ओ आर- II ]
ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 2nd August, 2010
S.O. 1943. Whereas , by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas , S.O. Nos . and dates as mentioned in the Schedule below issued under Sub- section ( i ) of Section ( 6) , Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government acquired the Right of User in the said lands specified in the schedule appended to those notification .
And whereas , in exercise of powers conferred by Sub - section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government vested the right of user in the lands free from all encumbrances in the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited.
And whereas , the Competent Authority has made a report to the Central Government that the pipeline for the purpose of transportation of motor sprit , Superior Kerosene Oil and High Speed Diesel from Manglya in the State of Madhya Pradesh to Bijwasan in the state of Delhi has been laid in the said lands and hence the operation may be terminated in District Bundi in the state of Rajasthan in respect of the said lands which in brief are specified in the Schedule annexed to this Notification .
Now, therefore , as required under explanation 1 of Rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Rules 1963 , the Central Government hereby declares the dates mentioned in coloumn 7 of the said schedule as the dates of termination in District Bundi the State of Rajasthan .
SCHEDULE
Tehsil
Name ofvillage Sr. No.
S. O.No. and date
(2)
(3)
(4) (1)
32 Dated 04-01-2006
District
State
Date of Termination (5)
(6)
(7)
Keshavrai Patan
1.
Patoliya
Bundi
Rajasthan 31-05-2007 Bundi
31-05-2007
Keshavrai Patan
Ishwar. Nagar
Kasba
Rajasthan
Keshavrai Patan
Keshavrai
Patan
Bundi
Rajasthan 31-05-2007 Bundi
Keshavrai Patan
Hathnapur
Rajasthan 31-05-2007 Bundi
Keshavrai Patan
31-05-2007 Rajasthan
Bundi
Keshavrai Patan
Bhiya
Rangrajpura
Rajasthan 31-05-2007 Bundi
31-05-2007 Rajasthan
Keshavrai Patan
Bundi
Keshavrai Patan
Arnetha
Rajasthan 31-05-2007
Keshavrai Patan
Shripura
Bundi
31-05-2007 Rajasthan
Bundi
Keshavrai Patan
Sarsala
31-05-2007 Rajasthan
Bundi
Keshavrai Patan
Bhavpura
Adila
Rajasthan 31-05-2007 Bundi
Keshavrai Patan
31-05-2007 Rajasthan भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
(4) (1)
(3)
Keshavrai Patan 1.
32Dated 04-01-2006
Kapren
Keshavrai Patan
Hirapur
(Contd.)
Keshavrai Patan
Garjani
Keshavrai Patan
Balapura
Keshavrai Patan
Arniya
Ardana
Keshavrai Patan
Keshavrai Patan
Kodkya
Keshavrai Patan
Ajanda
2.
3488 Dated 29-08-2006
Keshavrai Patan
Balapura
3.
Keshavrai Patan 387 Dated 05-02-2007
Patoliya
4.
Laban
2668 Dated 28-7-2005
Indragarh
Papdi
Indragarh
Badgaon Indragarh
Sakhavada Indragarh
Bishanpura Indragarh
Indragarh
Kanwarpura
Devpura
Indragarh
Dhakadkhedi Indragarh
Hardevganj Indragarh
Anghora
Indragarh
Sunari
Indragarh
Naya Gaon Indragarh
Tokaspura Indragarh
Ramnagar Indragarh
Indragarh
Rampuriya
Gudha
Indragarh
Badakheda Indragarh 5.
1484 Dated 14-04-2006 Bhandganwar Indragarh
Jadla
Indragarh 386 Dated 05-02-2007
6.
Anghora
Indragarh
HardevGanj Indragarh
Bhandganwar Indragarh
Laban
7.
2624 Dated 15-09-2008
Indragarh
Kota khurd 256 Dated 17-01-2006
8.
Indragarh
Laban
Indragarh
Sunari
Indragarh
Jadla
Indragarh
Badakheda Indragarh 257 Dated 17-01-2006
Indragarh 9 .
Baldevpura
Kotdi
Indragarh
Indragarh
Ghat ka Barana
4785 (5)
(6)
(7) Bundi
31-05-2007 Rajasthan
Bundi
31-05-2007 Rajasthan
Bundi
31-05-2007 Rajasthan
Bundi
31-05-2007 Rajasthan
Bundi
31-05-2007 Rajasthan
Bundi
31-05-2007 Rajasthan
Bundi
Rajasthan 31-05-2007 Bundi
Rajasthan 31-05-2007 Bundi
31-05-2007 Rajasthan
Bundi
31-05-2007 Rajasthan
Bundi
15-12-2008 Rajasthan
15-12-2008 Bundi
Rajasthan
15-12-2008 Bundi
Rajasthan
Bundi
15-12-2008 Rajasthan
Bundi
Rajasthan 15-12-2008 Bundi
15-12-2008 Rajasthan
Bundi
Rajasthan 15-12-2008 Bundi
15-12-2008 Rajasthan
Bundi
Rajasthan 15-12-2008
15-12-2008 Bundi
Rajasthan
Bundi
Rajasthan 15-12-2008 Bundi
15-12-2008 Rajasthan
Bundi
Rajasthan 15-12-2008 Bundi
Rajasthan 15-12-2008 Bundi
Rajasthan 15-12-2008
15-12-2008 Bundi
Rajasthan
15-12-2008 Bundi
Rajasthan
15-12-2008 Bundi
Rajasthan
15-12-2008 Bundi
Rajasthan
15-12-2008 Bundi
Rajasthan
15-12-2008 Bundi
Rajasthan
Bundi
15-12-2008 Rajasthan
Bundi
15-12-2008 Rajasthan
Bundi
31-12-2006 Rajasthan
Bundi
31-12-2006 Rajasthan
Bundi
31-12-2006 Rajasthan
Bundi
31-12-2006 Rajasthan
Bundi
31-12-2006 Rajasthan
Bundi
31-12-2006 Rajasthan
Bundi
31-12-2006 Rajasthan
Bundi
31-12-2006 Rajasthan 4786
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVAΝΑ 16 , 1932
(3)
(1)
(2)
(4) 257 Dated 17-01-2006
Jhapayata Indragarh
Dehi Kheda Indragarh 10.
3816 Dated 20-09-2006 Ghat ka Barana Indragarh
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
(6)
(5)
(7) Bundi
Rajasthan 31-12-2006 Bundi
Rajasthan 31-12-2006 Bundi
Rajasthan 31-12-2006 [ F. No. R- 31015/ 5 /2009 - OR - II ] A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy .
नई दिल्ली , 3 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 1944, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की नीचे दी गई अधिसूची में यथा उल्लिखित तारीखों की संख्या का. आ. द्वारा उन अधिसूचनाओं से संग्लन अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया था ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उक्त भूमियों में , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त उपयोग का अधिकार भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित किया था ।
और जबकि सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दी है कि मोटर स्प्रिट , उच्च कोटि का मिट्टी का तेल और वेग डीजल के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड के मध्य प्रदेश राज्य स्थित मांग्लया संस्थापन से दिल्ली राज्य स्थित बिजवासन संस्थापन तक उपर्युक्त भूमियों में पाईपलाईन बिछाई जा चुकी है। चूंकि राजस्थान राज्य के जिला करौली में पाईपलाईन बिछाई जा चुकी है , अतः ऐसी भूमि के बारे में जिसका विवरण इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची से विनिर्दिष्ट है , प्रचालन समाप्त किया जाए ;
अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1963 के नियम 4 के स्पष्टीकरण -1 के अधीन अपेक्षानुसार उक्त अनुसूची के स्तंभ 7 में उल्लिखित तारीखों को जिला करौली , राजस्थान राज्य में प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख के रूप में घोषित करती है ।
अनुसूची का.आ.सं. व तारीख
क्र. सं.
ग्राम का नाम
तहसील (2)
(3)
(1)
(4) 1 .
259712-07-2005
नीमोदा
सपोटरा
सपोटरा
एदलपुर
मांडा
सपोटरा
सपोटरा
खेड़ला
सपोटरा 2. 30-03-01-2006
एदलपुर
मांडा
सपोटरा
सपोटरा
खेड़ला
सपोटरा
नीमोदा
3. 447624-11-2006
सपोटरा
खेड़ला
4. 956-02-04-2007
नीमोदा
सपोटरा
सपोटरा
खेड़ला
सपोटरा
मांडा
सनेट
हिण्डौन 5. 3229-07-09-2005
हिण्डौन
कुतकपुर
हिण्डौन
जमालपुर
जिला
राज्य प्रचालन समाप्ति की तारीख (5)
(6)
(7) करौली
राजस्थान 31-7-2007 करौली
राजस्थान 31-7-2007 करौली
राजस्थान 31-7-2007 करौली
राजस्थान 31-7-2007 करौली
राजस्थान 31-7-2007 करौली
राजस्थान 31-7-2007
राजस्थान 31-7-2007 करौली
करौली
राजस्थान 31-7-2007 करौली
राजस्थान 31-7-2007 करौली
31-7-2007
राजस्थान
करौली
राजस्थान 31-7-2007 करौली
राजस्थान 31-7-2007 करौली
राजस्थान 30-4-2008 करौली
राजस्थान 30-4-2008 करौली
राजस्थान 30-4-2008 [ भाग 11 - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4787
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7, 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
(2)
(1)
(4)
(3)
3229-07-09-2005
हिण्डौन
खेड़ा
पाटोंदा
(-जारी )
हिण्डौन
काचरोली हिण्डौन
हिण्डौन
फुलवाड़ा
हिण्डौन
सिकरोदा मीना
हिण्डौन
हिण्डौन
हिण्डौन
मुकंदपुरा
हिण्डौन
बहादुरपुर
हिण्डौन
जटनगला
हिण्डौन
मिल्कीपुरा
ढिंढोरा
हिण्डौन
हिण्डौन
खिजूरी
धंधावली
हिण्डौन
हिण्डौन
सूरोठ
हिण्डौन
भुकरावली
6. 33-04-01-2006
हिण्डौन
सनेट
हिण्डौन
कुतकपुर
हिण्डौन
हिण्डौन
ढिंढोरा
हिण्डौन
हिण्डौन
भुकरावली
हिण्डौन
हिण्डौन 7. 955-02-04-2007
8. 212-31-01-2008
सनेट
हिण्डौन
हिण्डौन
हिण्डौन (5)
(6)
(7) करौली
राजस्थान 30-4-2008 करौली
राजस्थान 30-4-2008 करौली
30-4-2008
राजस्थान
करौली
राजस्थान 30-4-2008 करौली
राजस्थान 30-4-2008 करौली
राजस्थान 30-4-2008 करौली
राजस्थान 30-4-2008 करौली
राजस्थान 30-4-2008 करौली
राजस्थान 30-4-2008
राजस्थान
करौली
30-4-2008 करौली
राजस्थान 30-4-2008 करौली
राजस्थान 30-4-2008
30-4-2008 करौली
राजस्थान
करौली
30-4-2008
राजस्थान
करौली
30-4-2008
राजस्थान
करौली
30-4-2008
राजस्थान
करौली
30-4-2008
राजस्थान
30-4-2008 करौली
राजस्थान
30-4-2008 करौली
राजस्थान
30-4-2008 करौली
राजस्थान
करौली
30-4-2008
राजस्थान
करौली
30-4-2008
राजस्थान
करौली
30-4-2008
राजस्थान
[फा. सं. आर- 31015/6/2009-ओ आर- II ]
ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 3rd August , 2010
S.O. 1944. Whereas, by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas , S.O. Nos . and dates as mentioned in the Schedule below issued under Sub - Section ( i ) of Section ( 6 ) , Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962) , the Central Government acquired the Right of User in the said lands specified in the Schedule appended to those notification .
And whereas , in exercise of powers conferred by Sub- Section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government vested the right of user in the lands free from all encumbrances in the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited .
And whereas , the Competent Authority has made a report to the Central Government that the pipeline for the purpose of transportation of motor sprit , Superior Kerosene Oil and High Speed Diesel from Manglya in the State of Madhya Pradesh to Bijwasan in the State of Delhi has been laid in the said lands and hence the operation may be terminated in District Karauli in the State of Rajasthan in respect of the said lands which in brief are specified in the Schedule annexed to this Notification .
Now, therefore , as required under explanation 1 of Rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Rules 1963 , the Central Government hereby declares the dates mentioned in Column 7 of the said Schedule as the dates of termination in District Karauli in the State of Rajasthan .
2904 G1/ 2010-14 4788
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010SHRAVASA 10.19 : 2
::
Name of village Sr. No.
S. O.No. and date
(2)
( 1)
2597-12-07-2005
1.
Nimoda
Aidalpur
Manda
Chedia 2.
30-03-01-2006
Aidalpur
Manda 3.
Nimoda 4476-24-11-2006
Khedia 4.
956-02-04-2007
Nimoda
Khedla 5.
3229-07-09-2005
Patouda
Kachcroli
Fulwada
Sikroda Meena
Hindaun
Mukandpura
Bahadurpur
Jatnagla
MMilkipura
Dhindhora
Khijuri
Dhandhawali
Suroth
Bhukrayali 6.
Sanet 33-04-01-2006
Kutakpur
Hindaun
Dhindhora
Bhukravali 7. 955-02-04-2007
Hindaun 8. 212-31-01-2008
Sanet
Hindaun
SCHEDULE
Tehsil
District
(4)
ka
Sapoira
Karadi
Na esin
Sapotra
Karaal
Sapotra
Sapotra
Sapona
Sapotra
Sapotra
Sapoura
Spotra
Sapotra
Raja Thes
Sapotra
Sapora
Hindaun
isarauli
Rajasthan
Hindaun
Karculi
Rajastha
Karaut
Hindaun
Rajastha
Hindaun
Rajastha
Karauli
Hindaun
Rapistne
1405 Hindaun
Rajastha
Karauli
2008 Hindaun
Rajasthan
Karauli
Hindaun
Rajasthan
Karauli
Hindaun
Rajasthan
Karauli
Hindaun
Rajasthan
Karauli
Hindaun
Rajasiden
Karauli
Hindaun
Rajasthan
Karauli
Hindaun
Rajasthen
Karauli
Hindaun
Rajasthan
Karauli
Hindaun
Rajastiran
Karauli
Hindaun
Rajasthan
Karaul
Hindaun
Rajasthan
1-1-2008 Karauli
Hindaun
Rajasthan
Karauli
Hindaun
Rajasthan
Karauli
Hindaun
Rajasthan
Hindaun
Karauli
Rajastha
Hindaun
Karauli
Rajasthan.
Karauli
Hindaun
Kajastan
Karauli
Hindaun
Rajasthan
Koreul
Hindaun
Karauli
Hindaun
Kajasinar
3G-OR- I
[F. No. R- 31017 4789 सल का राजपत्र अगस्त 2010/15 , 1932
नई दिल्ली , 3 अगस्त , 2010
५०.ना. 1945, कोदी सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाईन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 की 5 को उप - उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की नीचे दी अंगसूची में यथा उल्लिखित तारोखों की संख्या का.आ. द्वारा उन अधिसूचनाओं से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार अर्जन किया था ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप- धारा (4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उक्त भूमियों में सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त उपयोग का अधिकार भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित किया था।
और जबकि सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दी है कि मोटर स्प्रिंट , उच्च कोटि का मिट्टी का तेल और वेग डीजल के "परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड के मध्य प्रदेश राज्य स्थित मांग्लया संस्थापन से दिल्ली राज्य स्थित बिजवासन संस्थापन तक उपर्युक्त भूमियों में पाईपलाईन बिछाई जा चुकी है। चूंकि राजस्थान राज्य के जिला टोंक में पाईपलाईन बिछाई जा चुकी है , अतः ऐसी भूमि के बारे में जिसका विवरण इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची से विनिर्दिष्ट है प्रचालन समाप्त किया जाए।
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम पाईपलाईन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1963 के नियम 4 के स्पष्टीकरण-1 के अधीन अपक्षानुसार उक्त अनुसूची के स्तंभ 7 में उल्लिखित तारीखों को जिला टोंक, राजस्थान राज्य में प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख के रूप में घोषित करती है ।
अनुसूची
ग्राम का नाम
तहसील
जिला
राज्य
प्रा. सं. का.आनं. व तारीख
प्रचालन सम्पति कीतारीख
(6)
(7) (2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1)
राजस्थान 20-9-2006
टोंक
उनियारा
1 . 1356-3-4-2006
मोहम्मदपुरा
[फा. सं. आर -31015/6/2009 - ओआर -11 ]
ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 3rd August , 2010
S.O. 1945. Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , S.O. Nos . and dates as mentioned in the Schedule below issued under Sub - Section ( i ) of Section ( 6 ) , Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government acquired the Right of User in the said lands specified in the schedule appended to those notification .
And whereas , in exercise of powers conferred by Sub- Section (4 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government vested the right of user in the lands free from all encumbrances in the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited.
And whereas , the Competent Authority has made a report to the Central Government that the pipcline for the purpose of transportation of motor sprit , Superior Kerosene Oil and High Speed Diesel from Manglya in the State of Madhya Pradesh to Bijwasan in the state of Delhi has been laid in the said lands and hence the operation may be terminated Districi Tonk in the State of Rajasthan in respect of the said lands which in brief are specified in the Schedule annexed to this Notification .
Now , therefore , as required under explanationl of Rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Rules 1963 , the Central Government hereby declares the dates mentioned in Column 7 of the said schedule as the dates of termination in District Tonk the State of Rajasthan .
SCHEDULE
District
Tehsil
State
S.No S.O. No. and Date
Name ofVillage
Date of Termination
(7)
(5)
(5)
(4)
(2)
(3)
(1)
20-9-2006
Tonk
1.
1356-3-4-2006
Rajasthan Mohammadpura Uniyara
[ F. No. R -31015 / 6 / 2009 - OR - II ]
A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy .
4790
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
[ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]
नई दिल्ली, 3 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 1946.-केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाईन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 6 की उप - उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की नीचे दी गई अधिसूची में यथा उल्लिखित तारीखों की संख्या का.आ. द्वारा उन अधिसूचनाओं से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया था ।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उक्त भूमियों में सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त उपयोग का अधिकार भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित किया था।
और जबकि सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दी है कि मोटर स्प्रिट , उच्च कोटि का मिट्टी का तेल और वेग डीजल के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड के मध्य प्रदेश राज्य स्थित मांग्लया संस्थापन से दिल्ली राज्य स्थित बिजवासन संस्थापन तक उपर्युक्त भूमियों में पाईपलाईन बिछाई जा चुकी है । चूंकि राजस्थान राज्य के जिला सवाई माधोपुर में पाईपलाईन बिछाई जा चुकी है, अतः ऐसी भूमि के बारे में जिसका विवरण इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची से विनिर्दिष्ट है प्रचालन समाप्त किया जाए।
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम पाईपलाईन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1963 के नियम 4 क स्पष्टीकरण । के अधीन अपेक्षानुसार उक्त अनुसूची के स्तंभ 7 में उल्लिखित तारीखों को जिला सवाई माधोपुर , राजस्थान राज्य में प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख के रूप में घोषित करती है। क्र.सं. का.आ.नं. व तारीख ग्राम का नाम (2)
( 1)
(3)
पाँचोलास 1. 2665-28.07.2005
अनुसूची
जिला
राज्य
तहसील
प्रचालन समाप्ति कीतारीख (5)
(6)
(7) (4)
राजस्थान
30-09-2007 सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
रवांजना डूंगर
राजस्थान
30-09-2007
सवाई माधोपुर
जुवाड सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
30-09-2007
सवाई माधोपुर
नीमली कलां सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
30-09-2007
सवाई माधोपुर
बोरीफ सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
30-09-2007 सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
गम्भीरा
राजस्थान
30-09-2007 सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
जीनापुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
बम्बोरी
राजस्थान
30-09-2007 सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
खेरदा
राजस्थान
30-09-2007 सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
जटवाड़ा खुर्द
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
ठींगला
राजस्थान
30-09-2007 सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
करमोदा
राजस्थान
30-09-2007 सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
लोधीपुरा
राजस्थान
30-09-2007 सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
सूरवाल
राजस्थान
30-09-2007
सवाई माधोपुर
घनौली सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
30-09-2007
सवाई माधोपुर
मखोली सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
30-09-2007
सवाई माधोपुर
चकेरी सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
30-09-2007 सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
रइथा कलां
राजस्थान
30-09-2007 सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
(1)
(2)
(3) 2665-28-7-2005
1
रइथा खुर्द
नीनोनी
रवांजना चौड़
कुस्तला
पंचीपल्या
फुसोदा
कानसीर
बाडोलास
कीरपुरा
पॉचोलास 2 578-08-02-2006
खेरदा
जटवाडा खुर्द
चकेरी
पंचीपल्या
दूंदरी
फुसोदा
कानसीर
लक्ष्मीपुरा 3 579-08-02-2006
दूंदरी 4 1576-18-04-2006
वोरीफ 5 4924-19-12-2006
सूरवाल
जटवाडा खुर्द
रईथा खुर्द
खांजना चौड़
कुस्तला
पंचीपल्या
फुसोदा
कीरपुरा
कुस्तला 6 1798-21-06-2007
चकेरी
फूसोदा
नीमली कलां
4791
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
(6)
(7) (4)
(5)
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाईमाधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
30-09-2007 सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर
30-09-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
सवाई माधोपुर THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 15 , 1932
(3)
(4)
पीलवा नदी
2005-08-2005
(5)
राजस्थान
संवाई गाधोपुर
मलारना डूंगर
बाढ पोतवा नद।
या अस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
मलारना डूंगर
चक बिलोली
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
मलारना डूंगर
कोशाली
M
राजस्थान
मलारना डूंगर
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
मलारना डूंगर
-46449-12-2005
राजस्थान
मलारना डूंगर
मकसूदनपुरा
25-04-01-2007 मकसूदनपुरा
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
मलारना डूंगर
पीलवा नदी
1801-21-06-2007
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
मलारना डूंगर
टटवाडा
5-08-2005
गंगापुर
बाढ रटवाडा
गंगापुर
गंगापुर
नारायणपुर
गंगापुर
बाढ मिलकपुर
गंगापुर
हीरापुर
गंगापुर
जयसिंहपुरा
टूटोलाई
गंगापुर
ढाय
गंगापुर
गंगापुर
बूचोलाई
ऊमरी
गंगापुर
गंगापुर
लालपुर
गंगापुर
सलेमपुर
चूली
गंगापुर
मऊकलां
गंगापुर
गंगापुर
मऊ खुर्द
चक छावा
गंगापुर
गंगापुर
खानपुर बड़ोदा
बडोदा जाट
गंगापुर
टोक्सी
गंगापुर
डोब
गंगापुर
विनेगां
गंगापुर
छान
गंगापुर
गंगापुर
उदई खुर्द
सेवा
गंगापुर
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
गजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
3505-2008 सवाई माधोपुर
31-08-3008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
31-06-2008 सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2003 सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2008 सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2008 सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2008 सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2008 सवाई माधोपुर भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( it ) ]
1) (2)
(3)
(4) 2940-18-8-2005
गंगापुर
शेखपुर बुजुर्ग
गंगापुर
वजीरपुर
गंगापुर
खरेड़ा
गंगापुर
किशोरपुर
खंडीय
गंगापुर 12-38-05-01-2006
गंगापुर
किशोरपुर
भालपुर
गंगापुर
बाढ़ टटवाडा
गंगापुर
खंडीप
गंगापुर 13- 3818-21-9-2006 चूली
गंगापुर
टोक्सी
गंगापुर
गंगापुर
सलेमपुर
खरेडा
गंगापुर
खानपुर बड़ोदा
गंगापुर
श्यारोली
14- 3819-21-9-2006
गंगापुर
गंगापुर
वजीरपुर
गंगापुर
भालपुर
चुली
गंगापुर
छान
गंगापुर
खंडीप
गंगापुर 15-101-11-1-2007
गंगापुर
बाढ़ टटवाड़ा
ढाय
गंगापुर
उमरी
गंगापुर
गंगापुर
खाानपुर बड़ोदा
बिनेगा
गंगापुर
सेवा
गंगापुर
गंगापुर
किशोरपुर
गंगापुर
भालपुर
खंडीप
गंगापुर
टटवाडा
गंगापुर
गंगापुर
हीरापुर
चूली
गंगापुर
4793
(6)
(7) (5)
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2008 सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2008 सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2008 सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2008 सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2008 सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2008 सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2008 सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2008 सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2008 सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2008 सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2008 सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2008 सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
31-05-2008
राजस्थान
सवाई माधोपुर
[फा. सं. आर-31015/6/2009-ओ. आर- II ]
ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव 4794
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVAΝΑ 16 , 1932
[ PART II - SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
New Delhi , the 3rd August , 2010
S.O. 1946. Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas , S.O. Nos . and dates as mentioned in the Schedule below issued under Sub- Section ( i) of Section ( 6) , Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government acquired the Right of User in the said lands specified in the schedule appended to those notification.
And whereas , in exercise of powers conferred by Sub- Section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government vested the right of user in the iands free from all encumbrances in the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited .
And whereas , the Competent Authority has made a report to the Central Government that the pipeline for the purpose of transportation of motor sprit , Superior Kerosene Oil and High Speed Diesel from Manglya in the State of Madhya Pradesh to Bijwasan in the state of Delhi has been laid in the said lands and hence the operation may be terminated in District Sawai Madhopur in the State of Rajasthan in respect of the said lands which in brief are specified in the Schedule annexed to this Notification .
Now , therefore , as required under explanation 1 of Rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Rules 1963 , the Central Government hereby declares the dates mentioned in Column 7 of the said schedule as the dates of termination in District Sawai Madhopur the State of Rajasthan .
SCHEDULE
S.No.S.O. No , and Date
Tehsil
Name ofVillage
( 1)
(2)
(3)
(4) 1. 2665-28-07-2005 Pancholas
District
State
Date of Termination (5)
(6)
(7)
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Rawanjana Dungar Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Juwad
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Nimli Kalan
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Borif
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Gambhira
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Jinapur
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Bambori
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Kherda
Sawai Madhopur . Rajasthan
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Jatwada Khurd
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Thingla
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Karmoda
Sawai Madhopur Kajasthan
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Lodhipura
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Soorwal
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Dhanoli
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Makholi
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Chakeri
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30,09-2007
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
Reitha Kalan
Sawai Madhopur
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Reitha Khurd
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Ninoni
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Rawanjana Chod
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madh , ) pur
Sawai Madhopur
Kushtala
Rajasthan
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan 4795
भारत का राजपत्र: अगस्त 7 , 2010/श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]
(1)
(4)
Panchipalya
(5)
(6)
(7)
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur
Fusoda
Sawai Madhopur
Kansir
Sawai Madhopur
Badolas
Sawai Madhopur
Kirpura
Sawai Madhopur
2 578-08-02-2006 Pancholas
Sawai Madhopur
Kherda
Sawai Madhopur
Jatwada Khurd Sawai Madhopur
Chakeri
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007
Sawai Madhopur Sawai Madhopur
Panchipalya
Sawai Madhopur
Dundari
Sawai Madhopur
Fusoda
Sawai Madhopur
Kansir
Sawai Madhopur
3 579-08-02-2006 Lakshmipura
Sawai Madhopur
Dundari
4 1576-18-04-2006
Sawai Madhopur
Borif
5 4924-19-12-2006
Sawai Madhopur
Soorwal
Sawai Madhopur
Jatwada Khurd Sawai Madhopur
Reitha Khurd
Sawai Madhopur
Rawanjana Chod Sawai Madhopur
Kushtala
Sawai Madhopur
Panchipalya
Sawai Madhopur
Fusoda
Sawai Madhopur
Kirpura
Sawai Madhopur
6 1798-21-06-2007 Kushtala
Sawai Madhopur
Chakeri
Sawai Madhopur
Phausoda
Sawai Madhopur
Nimli Kalan
Sawai Madhopur
Pilwanadi
7 2764-5-08-2005
Malarna Dunger
Badh Pilwnaadi Malarna Dunger
ChakBiloli
MalarnaDunger
Kothali
Malarna Dunger
Abra
Malarna Dunger
8. 4644-9-12-2005 Maksudanpura Malarna Dunger
9. 25-04-01-2007
Malarna Dunger
Maksudanpura
Pilwa nadi
10. 1804-21-06-2007
Malarna Dunger
2904 GI/2010-15
Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajastt : an
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
30-09-2007
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
30-09-2007
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
30-09-2007
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
30-09-2007
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
30-09-2007
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
30-09-2007
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
30-09-2007
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
30-09-2007
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur 4796
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVAΝΑ 16 , 1932
(1)
(2)
(4)
(3)
Tatwada
11. 2940-18-08-2005
[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] (5)
(6)
(7)
31-05-2008
Gangapur
Badh Tatwada
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008 Sawai M3dhopur Rajasthan
Gangapur
Narayanpur
31-05-2008
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
Gangapur
31-05-2008
Gangapur
Badh Milakpur
Hirapur
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008
Gangapur
Jai Singhpura
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
31-05-2008
Gangapur
Tutolai
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008
Gangapur
Dhay
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008
Gangapur
Bucholai
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
31-05-2008
Gangapur
Umri
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008
Gangapur
Lalpur
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008
Gangapur
Salem pur
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008
Gangapur
Chuli
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-06-2008
Gangapur
Mau Kalan
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008
Gangapur
Mau Khurd
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008
Gangapur
Chak Chava
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008
Gangapur
Khanpur Badoda
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008
Gangapur
Badoda Jat
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
Gangapur
Toksi
31-05-2003
Gangapur
Dob
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008
Gangapur
Binega
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
31-05-2008
Gangapur
Chhan
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthar
Gangapur
Uday Khurd
-31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
Gangapur
Seva
31-05-2008
Gangapur
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008
Gangapur
Shekhpur Bujurg
Vazirpur
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
Gangapur
Khareda
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
Gangapur
Kishorpur
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
Gangapur
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
Gangapur
Khandip
12-38-05-01-2006 Toksi
31-05-20013
Gangapur
Binega
Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
Gangapur
Chhan
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
Gangapur
Uday Khurd
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
Gangapur
Seva
31-05-2008
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
Gangapur
Chuli
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthm ,
Gangapur
Khareda
31-05-2008
Rajasthan
Sawai MadhoplJr
Gangapur
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010 / श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
(4) (1)
Gangapur
Kishorpur
Bhalpur
Gangapur
Badh Tatwada Gangapur
Khandip
Gangapur
Chuli
13. 381821-9-2006
Gangapur
Toksi
Gangapur
Gangapur
Salempur
Khareda
Gangapur
Khanpur Badoda Gangapur 14. 381921-9-2006 Shyaroli
Gangapur
Vazirpur
Gangapur
Bhalpur
Gangapur
Chuli
Gangapur
Chhan
Gangapur
Khandip
Gangapur
Badh Tatwada
15- 101 11-1-2007
Gangapur
Dhay
Gangapur
Umri
Gangapur
Khanpur Badoda Gangapur
Binega
Gangapur
Seva
Gangapur
Gangapur
Kishorpar
Gangapur
Bhalpur
Gangapur
Khandip
Tatwada
Gangapur
Gangapur
Hirapur
Chuli
Gangapur
4797 (5)
(6)
31-05-2008
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008 Sav : ai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-200 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
31-05-2008
Rajasthan-
Sawai Madhopur
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
31-05-2008
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
31-05-2008
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhpul ' Rajasthan
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008 Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan
31-05-2008
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
31-05-2008
Rajasthan
Sawai Madhopur
[F. No. R- 31015 / 6/2009 - OR - II ]
A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली , 3 अगस्त, 2010
का.आ. 1947. केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाईन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की नीचे दी गई अधिसूची में यथा उल्लिखित तारीखों की संख्या का. आ. द्वारा उन अधिसूचनाओं से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधि कार का अर्जन किया था।
और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उक्त भूमियों में सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त उपयोग का अधिकार भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित किया था। 4798
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
[PART II -SEC. 3 ( ii) ] और जबकि सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दी है कि मोटर स्प्रिट , उच्च कोटि का मिट्टी का तेल और वेग डीजल के परिवहन के लिए भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड के मध्य प्रदेश राज्य स्थित मांग्लया संस्थापन से दिल्ली राज्य स्थित बिजवासन संस्थापन तक उपर्युक्त भूमियों में पाईपलाईन बिछाई जा चुकी है । चूंकि राजस्थान राज्य के जिला भरतपुर में पाईपलाईन बिछाई जा चुकी है , अतः ऐसी भूमि के बारे में जिसका विवरण इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची से विनिर्दिष्ट है प्रचालन समाप्त किया जाए ।
अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम पाईपलाईन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1963 के नियम 4 के स्पष्टीकरण -1 के अधीन अपेक्षानुसार उक्त अनुसूची के स्तंभ 7 में उल्लिखित तारीखों को जिला भरतपुर , राजस्थान राज्य में प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख के रूप में घोषित करती है ।
अनुसूची क्र. सं. का.आ.नं. व तारीख ग्राम का नाम
तहसील (2)
(1)
(3)
(4) 1.
2674 28-07-2005 रीछोली
बयाना
बयाना
पीलुपुरा
बयाना
नगला कुरवारिया
नगला खटका
बयाना
बयाना
लहचोरा कलां
नारोली
बयाना
बयाना
मिलकपुर
बयाना
भाग ब्रह्मवाद
बयाना
चहल
कारवारी
बयाना
बयाना
धाधूरेन
बयाना
सराय भम्बू
बयाना
सिंघाड़ा
सेवला
बयाना
बयाना
सिंघान खेड़ा
समोगर
बयाना
नहरोली
बयाना
बयाना
कोठी खेड़ा
बयाना
शेरगढ़
2. 4642 08-12-2005
बयाना
संतोकपुरा
बयाना
सिकंदरा
बांसरोली
बयाना 3. 1360 05-04-2006
बयाना
डुमरिया
रीछोली
बयाना
राज्य
जिला
प्रचालन समाप्ति की तारीख
(7) (5)
(6)
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010 / श्रावण 16 , 1932
'[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
(3)
(4) (1)
बयाना
नगला कुरवारिया
बयाना
नगला खटका
बयाना
मिलकपुर
बयाना
लहचोरा कलां
बयाना
भाग ब्रह्मवाद
चहल
बयाना
बयाना
कारवारी
धाधरेन
बयाना
बयाना
सिंघाडा
बयाना
सेवला
बयाना
सिंघारन खेड़ा
बयाना
समोगर
नहरोली
बयाना
बयाना
कोठी खेड़ा
बयाना
शेरगढ़
बयाना 4. 1361-05-04-2006 डुमरिया
बयाना
रीछोली
बयाना
नगला कुरवारिया
बयाना
मिलकपुर
बयाना
चहल
बयाना
कारवारी
धाधरेन
बयाना
बयाना
सिधाडा
बयाना
सिंधान खेड़ा
बयाना
समोगर
बयाना
नहरोली
बयाना
कोठी खेड़ा
बयाना
शेरगढ़
बयाना 5. 396-08-02-2007 शेरगढ़
बयाना
सिकंदरा
बयाना
नहरोली
बयाना
नगला खटका
बयाना
कारवारी
4799 (5)
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर 4800
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVAΝΑ 16 , 1932
(3)
(4) (1)
शहना
7.
रूपबास 2856-10-08-2005
जयचौली
रूपबास
रूपबास
तेहरा ब्रह्मण
रूपबास
कुन्देर
अंधियारी
रूपबास
रूपबास
नेकपुर
चकशहना
रूपबास
कैमासी
रूपबास
रूपबास
रहीमपुर
शेरीकलां
रूपबास
रूपबास
तुहिया पट्टी
8. 742-24-02-2006
शहना
रूपबास
जयचौली
रूपबास
पना
रूपबास
तेहरा ब्रह्मण
रूपबास
रूपबास
कुन्देर
अंधियारी
रूपबास
रूपबास
नेकपुर
कैमासी
रूपब्रास
रूपबास
रहीमपुर
शेरी कलां
रूपबास
रूपबास
तुहिया पट्टी
ककरौआ
9. 743-24-02-2006
रूपबास
शहना
10. 2065-22-05-2006
रूपबास
जयचौली
रूपबास
तेहरा ब्रह्मण
रूपबास
रूपबास
कुन्देर
अंधियारी
रूपबास
रूपबास
नेकपुर
कैमासी
रूपबास
रूपबास
रहीमपुर
रूपबास
तुहियापट्टी
[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (5)
(6)
(7)
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
30-06-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
30-06-2007 भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
30-06-2007 भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
30-06-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
30-06-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
30-06-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
30-06-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
30-06-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
30-06-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
30-06-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
30-06-2007 भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
30-06-2007 भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
30-06-2007 भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
30-06-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
30-06-2007 भरतपुर [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र: अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
(2)
(1)
(4)
(3)
जयचौली
रूपबास 10. 17-03-01-2007
अंधियारी
रूपबास
रूपबास
कुन्देर
11. 2938-18-08-2005
भरतपुर
अचलपुरा
अड्डी
भरतपुर
बगधारी
भरतपुर
बमनपुरा
भरतपुर
गोलपुरा
भरतपुर
भरतपुर
तुहिया
विलौठी
भरतपुर
भरतपुर
अड्डा
भरतपुर
धौरमुई
भरतपुर
गुंडवा
पार
भरतपुर
अठेरा
भरतपुर
मुरवारा
भरतपुर
टोंटपुर
भरतपुर
नगला बन्ध
13. 450-01-02-2006
भरतपुर
नगला विलौठी भरतपुर
बगधारी
14. 451-01-02-2006
भरतपुर
कस्बा भरतपुर चक भरतपुर
नं. 2
जघीना 1
भरतपुर
विलौठी
भरतपुर
पार
भरतपुर
अठेरा
भरतपुर
भरतपुर
बमनपुरा
15. 1574-17-04-2006 कस्बा भरतपुर चक भरतपुर
नं. - 2
जधीना 1
भरतपुर
सेवर कलां
भरतपुर
विलौठी
भरतपुर 16. 1575-17-04-2006
4801 (5)
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
30-06-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर 4802
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
(3)
(4) 17. 385-05-02-2007
भरतपुर
टोंटपुर
तुहिया
भरतपुर
गुंडवा
भरतपुर
सेवर कलां
भरतपुर
धौरमुई
भरतपुर
कस्बा भरतपुर
भरतपुर
चक नं. - 2
विलौठी
भरतपुर
जघीना ।
भरतपुर
अड्डी
भरतपुर
पार
भरतपुर 18. 2510-07-07-2005 बुरावई
कुम्हेर
उबार
कुम्हेर
सान्तरुक
कुम्हेर 19. 1357-04-04-2006
कुम्हेर
बुरावई
उबार
कुम्हेर
सान्तरुक
कुम्हेर 20. 1358-4-4-2006
कुम्हेर
बुरावई
उबार
कुम्हेर
सान्तरुक
कुम्हेर 21. 3633-7-9-2006
सान्तरुक
कुम्हेर
[PART II SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (5)
(7)
(6)
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
31-05-2007
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
31-05-2007 भरतपुर
10-12-2006
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
10-12-2006
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
10-12-2006 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
10-12-2006 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
10-12-2006 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
10-12-2006 भरतपुर
10-12-2006
राजस्थान
भरतपुर
राजस्थान
10-12-2006 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
10-12-2006 भरतपुर
राजस्थान
10-12-2006 भरतपुर
[फा. सं. आर-31015/6/2009- ओ आर- II ]
ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव
New Delhi , the 3rd August , 2010
S.O. 1947. Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas , S.O. Nos . and dates as mentioned in the Schedule below issued under Sub - Section ( i ) of Section ( 6 ) , Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government acquired the Right of User in the said lands specified in the schedule appended to those notification .
And whereas , in exercise of powers conferred by Sub - Section ( 4) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government vested the right of user in the lands free from all encumbrances in the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited.
And whereas , the Competent Authority has made a report to the Central Government that the pipeline for the purpose of transportation of motor sprit , Superior Kerosene Oil and High Speed Diesel from Manglya in the State of Madhya Pradesh to Bijwasan in the state of Delhi has been laid in the said lands and hence the operation may be terminated in District Bharatpur in the State of Rajasthan in respect of the said lands which in brief are specified in the Schedule anexed to this Notification .
Now , therefore , as required under explanation 1 of Rule 4 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Rules 1963 , the Central Government hereby declares the dates mentioned in Column 7 of the said schedule as the dates of termination in District Bharatpur the State of Rajasthan .
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
Tehsil S.No. S.O. No. and Date NameofVillage
(2)
(1)
(3)
(4) 2674-28-07-2005 Richholi
1.
Bayana
Pilupura
Bayana
Nagla Kurvariya Bayana
Nagla Khatka Bayana
Lahchora Kalan Bayana
Naroli
Bayana
Milakpur
Bayana
Bhag Brahmavad Bayana
Chahal
Bayana
Karvari
Bayana
Dhadhren
Bayana
Sarai Bhambu Bayana
Bayana
Singhada
Sewla
Bayana
Bayana
Singhan Kheda
Bayana
Samogarh
Nahroli
Bayana
Kothi Kheda Bayana
Bayana
Shergarh
2. 4642-08-12-2005
Bayana
Santokpura
Sikandra
Bayana
Bansroli
Bayana 3. 1360-05-04-2006
Bayana
Dumariya
Richholi
Bayana
Nagla Kurvariya Bayana
Nagla Khatka Bayana
Bayana
Milakpur
Lahchora Kalan Bayana
Bhag Brahmavad Bayana
Chahal
Bayana
Karvari
Bayana
Dhadhren
Bayana
Bayana
Singhada
2904 GI/2010-16
4803
SCHEDULE
State
District
Date of Termination (5)
(6)
(7)
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
31-05-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Rajasthan 31-05-2007 Bharatpur
Bharatpur Rajasthan 31-05-2007
31-05-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
31-05-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
31-05-2007 Bharatpur
Rajasthan
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
31-05-2007 Bharatpur
Rajasthan
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
31-05-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
31-05-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
31-05-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Rajasthan 31-05-2007 Bharatpur
31-05-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
31-05-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
31-05-2007 Bharatour
Rajasthan
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
31-05-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
31-05-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
31-05-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur '4804
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
(1)
(3)
(4) 3. 1360-05-04-2006 Sewla
[PART 11 -- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (5)
(6)
(7)
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bayana
Bharatpur
31-05-2007
Bayana
Singhan Kheda
Samogarh
Bharatpur Rajasthan
31-05-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
Bayana
Nahroli
31-05-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
Bayana
Kothi Kheda
31-05-2007 Bharatpur
Rajasthan
Bayana
Shergarh
31-05-2007 Bharatpur
Rajasthan
Bayana
4. 1361-05-04-2006 Dumariya
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bayana
Richholi
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bayana
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bayana
Nagla Kurvariya
Milakpur
Bharatpur
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bayana
Chahal
31-05-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
Bayana
Karvari
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bayana
Dhadhren
Bharatpur
31-05-2007 Bharatpur
Rajasthan
Bayana
31-05-2007
Bayana
Singhada
Singhan Kheda
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
31-05-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
Bayana
Samogarh
31-05-2007
Bayana
Nahroli
Bharatpur
Rajasthan
31-05-2007 Bharatpur
Bayana
Kothi Kheda
Rajasthan
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bayana
Shergarh
Bharatpur
31-05-2007 Bharatpur
Bayana
5. 396-08-02-2007 Shergarh
Rajasthan
31-05-2007 Bharatpur
Bayana
Sikandra
Rajasthan
31-05-2007 Bharatpur
Rajasthan
Bayana
Nahroli
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bayana
Nagla Khatka
31-05-2007 Bharatpur
Bayana
Karvari
Rajasthan
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bayana
6. 2856-10-08-2005 Shahna
Bharatpur
30-06-2007
Roopbas
Jaichauli
Bharatpur
Rajasthan
30-06-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
Roopbas
Tehra Brahman
30-06-2007
Roopbas
Kunder
Bharatpur Rajasthan
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Roopbas
Andhiyari
30-06-2007 Bharatpur
Roopbas
Rajasthan
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Roopbas
Nekpur
Chakshahna
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Roopbas
Kaimasi
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Roopbas
30-06-2007 Bharatpur
Rajasthan
Roopbas
Rahimpur
Sheri Kalan
30-06-2007
Roopbas
Tuhia Patti
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Roopbas
Kanjoli
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Roopbas
Bharatpur 4805
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7, 2010/श्रावण 16 , 1932
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
7. 742-24-02-2006 Shahna
(7)
(6)
(5)
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Roopbas
Jaichauli
Bharatpur
30-06-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
Roopbas
Pana
30-06-2007 Bharatpur
Rajasthan
Roopbas
Tehra Brahman
30-06-2007
Roopbas
Kunder
Bharatpur Rajasthan
30-06-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
Roopbas
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Roopbas
Andhiyari
Nekpur
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Roopbas
Kaimasi
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Roopbas
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Roopbas
Rahimpur
Sheri Kalan
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Roopbas
Tuhia Patti
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Roopbas
Kakroua
8. 743-24-02-2006
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Roopbas
Shahna
9. 2065-22-05-2006
30-06-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
Roopbas
Jaichauli
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Roopbas
Tehra Brahman
Bharatpur
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Roopbas
Kunder
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Bhasatpur
Roopbas
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Roopbas
Andhiyari
30-06-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
Roopbas
Nekpur
Kaimasi
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Roopbas
Rahimpur
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Roopbas
Tuhia Patti
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Roopbas
Jaichauli
10. 17-03-01-2007
30-06-2007
Roopbas
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
30-06-2007
Rajasthan
Roopbas
Andhiyari
Kunder
Bharatpur
30-06-2007 Bharatpur
Rajasthan
Roopbas
11. 2938-18-08-2005
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bharatpur
Achalpura
Addi
31-05-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
Bharatpur
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bagdhfari
Bhararpur
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bamanpura
Bharatpur
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bharatpur
Golpura
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bharatpur
Tuhiya
Vilothi
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bharatpur
Adda
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bharatpur
Dhormuei
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bharatpur
Gundva
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bharatpur
Par
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bharatpur
Athera
31-05-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Murvara
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bharatpur
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bharatpur
Tontpur 4806
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
(1)
(3)
(4) (2)
12. 450-01-02-2006 Nagla Bandh
[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] (5)
(6)
(7)
31-05-2007 Bharatpur Rajasthan
Bharatpur
31-05-2007
Bharatpur
Nagla Vilothi
13. 451-01-02-2006
Bharatpur Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bharatpur
Bagdhari
Kasba Bharatpur
Rajasthan 31-05-2007
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bharatpur
Chak No. 2
31-05-2007
Bharatpur
Jaghina I
Vilothi
Bharatpur
Rajasthan
31-05-2007
Bharatpur
Par
Bharatpur Rajasthan
31-05-2007 Bharatpur
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Athera
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bharatpur
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bharatpur
Bamanpura
14. 1574-17-04-2006 Kasba Bharatpur
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bharatpur
Chak No. 2
Jaghina 1
31-05-2007
Bharatpur
Sewarkalan
Bharatpur Rajasthan
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Vilothi
151575-17-04-2006
Bharatpur
31-05-2007
Bharatpur
16. 385--05-02-2007 Tontpur
Bharatpur
Rajasthan
31-05-2007
Bharatpur
Tuhiya
Bharatpur Rajasthan
31-05-2007 Bharatpur
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Gundva
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Sewar Kalan
Bharatpur
31-05-207 Bharatpur
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Dhormuei
31-05-2007 Bharatpur
Bharatpur
Kasba Bharatpur
Rajasthan
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bharatpur
Chak No. 2
Vilothi
17. 385 - Contd .
31-05-2007 Bharatpur
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Jaghina I
31-05-2007 Bharatpur
Bharatpur
Addi
Rajasthan
31-05-2007 Bharatpur
Bharatpur
Par
Rajasthan
31-05-2007
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
Bharatpur
Buravai
Kumher 18. 2510-07-07-2005
Ubar
10-12-2006 Bharatpur
Rajasthan
Kumher
Santruk
Kumher
Buravai
Kumher 19. 1357-04-04-2006
Ubar
10-12-2006
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
10-12-2006 Bharatpur
Rajasthan
10-12-2006 Bharatpur Rajasthan
Kumher
Santruk
Kumher
Buravai
Kumher - 20. 1358-4-4-2006
Ubar
10-12-2'006
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
10-12-2006
Rajasthan
Bharatpur
10-12-2006 Bharatpur Rajasthan
10-12-2006
Kumher
Santruk
Kumher
Kumher
Santruk
21. 3633-7-9-2006
Bharatpur
Rajasthan
10-12-2006 Bharatpur
Rajasthan
10-12-2006 Bharatpur Rajasthan
[F. No. R - 31015 / 6 /2009 - OR - II ]
A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy ..
4807 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
शुद्धि-पत्र
नई दिल्ली , 3 अगस्त , 2010
का.आ. 1948.- क्योंकि , भारत सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईपलाईन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) ( जिसे इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण में , भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की दिनांक 15-9-2007 को प्रकाशित अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 2596 दिनांक 10-9-2007 के साथ पठित दिनांक 11-4-2009 को प्रकाशित अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 868 दिनांक6-4-2009 ( जिसे इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिसूचना कहा गया है ) के द्वारा उसके अन्तर्गत दी गई सारिणी में वर्णित 3 ( तीन ) व्यक्तियों को , उड़ीसा राज्य के सभी जिलों में विभिन्न उपभोक्ताओं को वितरण करने के लिए , मैसर्स रिलोजिसटिक्स इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर लिमिटेड ( रिलॉग ) , जिसका रजिस्ट्रीकृत कार्यालय भूतल , ' चित्रकूट , ' श्रीराम मिल्स परिसर , गणपतराव कदम मार्ग , वोर्ली , मुम्बई ( महाराष्ट्र) में हैं , के द्वारा प्राकृतिक गैस के परिवहन के लिए काकीनाडा- बासुदेवपुर- हावड़ा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन सक्षम प्राधिकारियों के कृत्यों का पालन करने के लिए नियुक्त किया था;
है; और क्योंकि उक्त अधिसूचना में , श्री ब्रज किशोर पाण्डा, प्राधिकृत सक्षम अधिकारी का नाम गलती से श्री ब्रज सुन्दर पाण्डा कहा गया अतः अब , भारत सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण में , निर्देश देती है कि उक्त अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 868 दिनांक 6-4-2009 में निम्नांकित संशोधन किया जाता है : -
पढ़ा जाए । अधिसूचना में दी गई सारिणी में कॉलम ( 1 ) के नीचे आइटम 3 में " श्री ब्रज सुन्दर पाण्डा " के स्थान पर " श्री ब्रज किशोर पाण्डा "
[फा. सं. एल. - 14014/24/2008-जी.पी. ] के. के. शर्मा , अवर सचिव
CORRIGENDUM
New Delhi , the 3rd, August , 2010
S.O. 1948. Whereas in pursuance of clause ( a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , ( hereinafter called the said Act ) , the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas Notification No. S.O. 868 dated 06.04.2009 ( published on 11-04-2009 ) read with their Notification No. S.O. 2596 dated 10-09-2007 ( published on 15-09-2007 ) , authorized 03 ( Three ) persons mentioned in column ( 1 ) of the Table given there under to perform the functions of the Competent Authorities under the said Act for laying of Kakinada - Basudebpur Howrah Pipeline by M / s . Relogistics Infrastructure Limited ( RELOG ) , having its Registered Office at Ground Floor , ' Chitrakoot ' , Sriram Mills Premises , Ganpat Rao Kadam Marg , Worli , Mumbai -400013 ( Maharashtra ) for transportation of natural gas for distribution to various consumers in respect of the areas in all the districts of Orissa State;
And whereas , the name of Shri Braja Kishore Panda , thereby appointed as a Competent Authority , has been erroneously stated as Shri Braja Sunder Panda by typographical mistake in the aforesaid Gazette notification ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause (a) of Section 2 of the said Act , the Government of India hereby directs that the notification No. S.O. 868 dated 06-04-2009 may be amended in the manner specified hereunder :-- Read " Shri Braja Kishore Panda " for " Shri Braja Sunder Panda " against item 3 under column ( 1 ) of Table below the notification .
[ F. No. R- 14014/24/2008 -GP]
K. K. SHARMA , Under Secy .
4808
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 5 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1949.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एच पी सी एल बोटलिंग पलांट , पुणे के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , पुणे के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 5/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-7-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -30012/ 3/2007 - आईआर ( एम ) ] कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT New Delhi , the 5th July , 2010
S.O. 1949. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 5/2007 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal , Pune now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of H PCL Bottling Plant , Pune and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 5-7-2010 .
[No. L - 30012/3 /2007 - IR ( M ) ]
KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI SHRIKANT K. DESHPANDE, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL MAHARASHTRAAT PUNE Reference ( IT ) No. 5 of 2007
M/ s . HPCL Bottling Plant ,
Village- Mahalunge Ingale , Chakan ,
Talegaon Road , Chakan - 410 501
FirstParty
AND
Shri K.P. Shingade ,
Jaiprakash Apt . Jai Malanagar ,
Old Sanghvi , Pune - 411 027
Second Party In the matter of reinstatement CORAM : Shri Shrikant K. Deshpande , Member
APPEARANCES
Shri A. K. Gupte , Advocate for first party
Shri M. 1. Pathan ,Advocate for Second party
AWARD
Delivered on 22-4-2010
This is a Reference made by the Ministry of Labour , Government of India , New Delhi vide its order dtd 1-6-07,
[PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] in exercise of powers under Section - 10 Sub- Sec . 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 and referred the dispute in relation to the reinstatement between HPCL Bottling Plant, Chakan , Pune ( first party ) and K. P. Shingade ( second party) in respect of demand specified in Schedule to the Reference.
2.According to the second party he was appointed as a Filler at Loni Kalbhor plant of the first party on 20-1-87 , transferred on request in June 2004 to HPCL Bottling Plant at Chakan , Pune and worked as a Plant operator with the first party. He was served with the charge sheet dtd. 17-3-04 for the misconduct of remaining absent from duty for 203 days during January 2001 to 2003 , domestic enquiry was initiated against him for the charges levelled in the charge sheet . The second party added that , period of absence of 2002 to 2003 was regularized by letters dtd . 28-7-03 & 19-11-03 and 46 days he was admitted in the hospital and though he was warned and cautioned for absenteeism of 99 days still that period was also considered for punishment & thereby subjected to double punishment for minor lapses .
The second party further added that , though the first party conducted the enquiry for the charges levelled in the charge sheet however during enquiry he was not paid subsistence allowance , there was no reference of any documents nor witnesses of management and witnesses were not examined by the management during enquiry . The enquiry report was in English language and not language known to second party , the whole enquiry was conducted in violation of the principles of natural justice . The findings drawn by the enquiry officer is not based on the material available on record therefore perverse . The second party also added that , the first party has not taken into consideration the total length of service and awarded the punishment of discharge however such punishment shocks to the conscious of court and the same is not justified . Lastly the second party urged that enquiry proceedings suffered from several infirmities and punishment imposed is not commensurate with the gravity of the guilt thus the second party prays for reinstatement with continuity of service with back wages by answering the reference in the affirmative .
3. The first party resisted the claim of the second party by reply Exh.C - 9 . The first party contended that the government has referred the dispute regarding termination of services of second party dtd . 1-6-2000 however there is no termination of the second party on 1-6-2000 and the services of the second party are terminated w.e.f. 8-12-05 . As the termination dtd . 8-12-05 is not under challenge hence the present reference is not tenable under law .
In the aternative the first party contended that, the second party remained absent for 203 days during 2001 to 2003 therefore he was served with the charge sheet dtd . 17- 3-04 , the charges were denied by reply dtd . 20-3-04 hence [भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
4809
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7, 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
regular domestic enquiry was conducted for the charges levelled in the charge sheet by appointing independent enquiry officer . During the course of enquiry the second party admitted the charges levelled against him and through desired to produce the document but failed . Thereafter the enquiry officer submitted his findings on 15-10-05 holding the second party guilty for the misconduct . The copy of enquiry officer's report was served alongwith letter dtd. 21-10-05 but no comments were offered and considering the past service record it was not desirable to continue the second party in the employment hence his services were came to be discharged by order dtd . 8-12-05 . Lastly the first party urged that , during enquiry full opportunity was given to the second party and enquiry conducted against the second party is fair & proper and there was no double punishment as alleged by the second party , thus the discharge is legal & justified and the second party is not entitled for any relief as prayed and requested that reference be answered in the negative .
4. I have framed the following issues at Exh.6-
ISSUES
(1 ) Whether the present Reference is tenable under law?
(2) Does the second party proves that the enquiry conducted against him on the charge sheet dtd . 17-3-04 is in utter disregard to the principles of natural justice .
(3) Whether the findings of the enquiry officer is perverse?
(4) If yes , whether the first party proves the misconduct of second party before the court ?
(5) Whether the awarded punishment is shockingly disproportionate?
(6) Whether the order of discharge is legal & justified ?
(7) Whether the second party is entitled for relief as prayed?
(8) In what manner the reference is answered ?
My findings to the above issues are as below :-
FINDINGS
(1) Yes
(2) No
(3) No
(4) Does not survive
(5) No
(6) Yes
(7) No
(8) As per following award .
The above findings is for the following reasons :
REASONS
5. Issue Nos . 1. 2 & 3 : On request of both the parties these issues are taken for decision as preliminary issues and after hearing the parties , this court vide its order dtd . 10-11-09 observed that the Reference is tenable under law , the enquiry conducted against the second party is not in utter disregard to the principles of natural justice and the findings of the enquiry officer is not perverse , hence I answer these Issues accordingly .
6. Issue No. 4 : As I answered the Issues No.2 & 3 regarding procedural aspect of enquiry and finding in the negative this Issue does not survive , hence I answer this Issue accordingly .
7. Issue Nos . 5 & 6 : Both these isues are pertaining to the punishment therefore are answered together . Both the parties have not adduced any oral evidence on these issues before the court and filed pursis to that effect Exh . U -13 & C - 12 respectively .
It has sufficiently come on record that during January 2001 to November 2001 the second party remained absent for 58 days i.e. 14 days in January , 5 days in February , 6 days in March , 4 days in April , 5 days in May , 4 days in June, 3 days in July , 4 days each in August , September & October and 5 days in November . Similarly the second party remained absent for 58 days in 2002 i.e. one day in January, 6 days in March , 8 days in April , 5 days in June , 4 days in July and 14 days in November . The second party also remained absent for 107 days during January 2003 to December 2003 i.e. one day in January , 6 days in March , 7 days in April , 8 days in June , 5 days in July , 7 days in September , 30 days in October , 26 days in November and 17 days in December 2003. From the above description it seems that , during 2001 to 2003 , the second party remained absent in almost every month and duration of absence was ranging from 4 days to 30 days . This fact has been fairly admitted by the second party during enquiry which was conducted against him therefore there is no hitch to accept that the absenteeism of the second party was habitual in nature and if we considered the period of absence of the second party in November and December 2008 then it is certainly absence without leave for more than 21 consecutive days . In such circumstances the nature of proved misconduct of second party cannot be said to be minor in nature and for such misdonduct the awarded punishment of discharge is certainly not disproportionate .
8. It further reveals that , even after issuance of charge sheet also the second party remained absent unauthorizedly for 153 days during June 2004 to October 2005 without any just and sufficient explanation . True it is that for those misconducts the second party was not served with the charge sheet therefore no punishment can be 4810
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
awarded for that period of absenteeism however this aspect of remaining absent from duties is certainly relevant and necessary for deciding the quantum of punishment awarded to the second party .
9. Though it is contended on behalf of the second party that during this period the second party was hospitalized for medical treatment, therefore he could not attend the duties regularly however the second party could notjustify the same before court , Moreover it reveals from the copy of medical certificate available on record that the second party was hospitalized only during 5-10-03 to 10-11-03 therefore it will be unsafe to say that the second party remained absent from duties due to medical ground or reasons .
10. Much is argued on behalf of the second party that, during that period the mental condition of the second party was disturbed as there was an incidence of outaging the modesty of his wife by gunda and due to that he was irregular in attending the duties , however it seems that the so called incident was occurred in the year 1997 and the alleged absenteeism was of2001 to 2003 therefore I do not think that the absenteeism is because of the mental condition of the second party . Even otherwise also the period of absenteeism was not continuous but it was frequent . It means during the period other than absenteeism the second party was fit to perform the duty and he could have sought necessary permission for leave but unfortunately it was not done there is no explanation much less sufficient for not seeking permission to remain absent, therefore it cannot be said that the absence of the second party is due to mental condition and the same is for justified reasons .
11. It is also contended on behalf of the second party that, for the similar misconducts the second party was already punished and his salary was also deducted therefore awarding punishment of discharge for the same misconduct amounts to double punishment . As against that it is contended on behalf of the first party that , previously the second party was never punished for said misconduct and the second party was not present for duties inthose days therefore he was not given salary and it does not amounts to double punishment .
I have given anxious consideration to the oral submissions of the parties in the light of various copies of documents available on record . On careful perusal of the letters dtd . 28-7-03 and 19-11-03 it reveals that by these letters the second party was cautioned about his absenteeism and he was also warned that he should not remain absent from duties in future , however it does not amount to punishment . I may be giving warning for action in case of absenteeism in future but not punishment . Similarly as the second party did not report for duty nor obtained necessary permission for that absence therefore he was not entitled for salary/wages for that period thus
[PART II --SEC. 3 (ii)] the deduction of wages does not amounts to punishment and it cannot be said that , the second party was punished double for the same misconduct . The contention of the second party about double punishment is baseless and cannot be accepted.
From the above discussion it is certain that the nature ofproved misconduct is not minor and technical in nature . There are no sufficient and justified reasons for remaining absent from duties for 203 days during 2001 to 2003 and considering the nature of proved misconduct and also coupled with subsequent absenteeism , which was nowhere denied by the second party and in absence of double punishment as alleged by the second party , Ido not think that, the awarded punishment of discharge is shockingly disproportionate or unjustified but the order of discharge appears to be justified , hence I answer these issues in the negative & affirmative respectively.
12. Issue No. 7 : I have observed earlier that , the Reference as framed is tenable under law , however the enquiry conducted against the second party on the charge sheet dtd . 17-3-04 is not in utter disregard to the principles ofnaturaljustice , the findings of enquiry officer is not at all perverse and the awarded punishment of discharge is not shockingly disproportionate nor unjustified, moreover the order of discharge is justified , therefore the second party isnot entitled for relief as prayed .
I have also gone through the various decision of Supreme Court & Bombay High Court in Life Insurance Corporation of India V/s . R. Dhandapani , 2006 - I - CLR- 32- (SC) ; M/s . L & T Kornatsu Ltd. V/ s . N. Udaykumar , 2008- LIC-415 ; and NRCLtd. V/s . NRC Employees Union , 2001- III-CLR- 286-(BHC) . All these decisions are under Sec - 11 -A ofthe I.D. Act , in which the employee was punished for the misconduct of absenteeism and the Lower Court intervened in the order of punishment , however by setting aside the orders of the Lower Court it has been observed that, the exercise ofdiscretion by the Labour Court U/s.11 -A was not judicious proper and Lower Courts erred in interfering the punishment of dismissal and thereby the orders of Lower Court are unjustified . In the instant case also I have observed earlier that the order of discharge awarded to the second party is justified and not at all unjustified or disproportionate , therefore considering the proved misconduct coupled with the decisions discussed above I am not inclined to interfere in the order of discharge awarded by the first party , therefore the second party is not entitled for relief as prayed, hence I answer this Issue inthe negative .
In the result I proceed to pass the following Award . AWARD 1. The Reference is rejected with no order as to costs.
[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
2. The second party is not entitled for any relief as prayed.
3. Copies be sent to the appropriate authorities.
Pune: Date: 22-4-2010
SHRIKANT K. DESHPANDE , Industrial Tribunal नई दिल्ली , 5 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1950.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार अंकुर माईनिंग प्रा. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय जयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 32/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 5-7-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-29012/47/2006- आईआर ( एम) ] कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 5th July, 2010
S.O. 1950.- In Pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 32/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Jaipur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Ankur Mining Pvt . Ltd. , and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 5-7-2010 .
[No. L -29012/47/2006- IR (M) ] KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM -LABOUR COURT JAIPUR
PRESENT
N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer
I.D. 32/2007
Reference No. L-29012/47 /2006- IR (M ) dated: 14-5-2007
BETWEEN
Shri Puranmal , S/ o Shri Kanhaiya Lal ,
R/o Falodi Quari , Q.No.239/400 , Tehsil Khandar, Sawai Madhopur ( Rajasthan)
2904 GI/2010-17
4811
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 7, 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
AND
TheManager
Ankur Mining Pvt. Ltd. , Gehlot Bhawan, New Colony Near Panch Batti , Jaipur
AWARD 31-5-2010
1. The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under clause D of Sub Section 1 & 2 ( A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 has referred the following Industrial dispute to this tribunal for adjudication which is as under:-
"Whether the action of the management of M/ s Ankur Mining Pvt . Ltd. , Jaipur in terminating the services of Sh . Puranmal , Driver , at Sonu Mines , Jaisalmer w.e.f. 4-2-2005 is legal andjustified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date?"
2. Pursuant to the receipt of the reference the registered notices were issued to both the parties and on behalf of the non - applicant its representative put her appearance before the tribunal . The A.D. of the registered notice issued to the workman has been returned after personal service upon the workman Puranmal . On careful perusal , it is found that the address written on the copy of notice is similar to that of address mentioned in the reference . Even the Central Government has issued the notice to the workman with a direction to the claimant to file the statement of claim along with relevant documents , list ofwitness with the tribunal within 15 days of the receipt ofthe order of reference . But the workman has not appeared to file his statement of claim . It shows that the workman is not willing to plead his claim.
3. in reference under adjudication the question unde consideration is whether the alleged action of the management in terminating the services of the workman is not valid & justified. Initial burden to prove this was on the claimant but he has neither appeared nor filed any claim despite service of notice upon him.
4. It is well settled that if a party challenges the legality of an order or action of the management , the burden lies upon him to prove the illegality of the order or alleged action & if no evidence is produced , the party invoking jurisdiction ofthe court must fail . Since the industrial dispute was raised by the workman , it was incumbent for the workman to have appear & file his statement of claim for alleged unjustified action of the opposite party in compliance ofthe direction given in reference order . But he has not adduced any material on record on the basis of which it can be said that alleged action of the opposite party was unjustified or illegal .
THE GAZETTE OF IDA AUGUST 1 2010 / SHRAVANA 16, 1932
..
Resultantly, the reference under sipalication is Med in negative against the wor'n in and in favour the opposite party . The alleged actiesect the management neposre party cannot be said tapastified or ward as above .
1 a copy of the award he sent to Central jor publication under Section 1 ) of the
N. K. PUROHIT, Presioag Officer नई दिल्ली , 5 जुलाई , 2010
अ. 1951, औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , कचय सरकार गेई दाट के प्रबंधतंत्र संबद्ध नियोजनों और उनके रोच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विद में केन्द्रीय गिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सुम्बई के प्रचार ( संदर्भ 10001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो चोली प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-31011/2/ 2000 आई कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी ( एम) ] New Delhi , the Sth July, 2010
1951. in pursuance of Section 17 of the Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central at hereby publishes the award ( Ret . No 27/2001) alGoverinent Industrial Tribunal our Court Ja now as shown in the Annexure in the Dispute between the employers in relation to Tet of Mumbai Port Itust and their workman , received by the Central Government
[No. L -31011 /27G JA ( M)] KAMAL BAKHRUAR: Officer
ANNEXURL ORETHLCENTRAL.GOVERNMAH INDRETRIALTRIBUN .Nc.2MMBAI
PRESEV
A. A. LAD, residing Of
REFERENCENO CGIT
DAWPS OYERS IN RELATION TOTTESANAGEMENT ORUMBAI PORT TRUST
The Choreo れ 、 Mumbou Trust , Mumbet 100038 .
First Party Mumbai Port Trust Dock and Geni . Employees Union . The Secretary, Kamgar Sadan . Mazagon, Mumbai- Prontod Gangaram Khot
Por the imployer : Mr. B. Alche
For the Workmen: Mr. Sam
Date ofres.rving the Award 23-4 201
Date of passing La : Award 76.2010
AWARD PART - 1
The matrix of the facts as coiled cut them the proceedings are as under :
1. The Government of India , Miniserachy its OrderNo. L -31011 / 27 / 2000 - TL ( M ) date Pin 2001 in exercise of the power conferred by clause ( d) sub- section ( 1 ) and sub -section 2 (A) of Sectione sẽ of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication
"Whether the action of the management of Muniba Port Trust, Mumbai in testninating the service of Promod Gangaram Khot , Tally Chet way of removal from service w.e f . 8-3-99 is 'egal and justified? If not , what relief the work is entitled to?
2. Claim Statement is filed by the conceme iWorkmea at Exhibit 7 stating and contending that t Falls Clerk in the Docks Department of Moraba : Fod Des It is his case that , due to some unavoidable Groansances he unable to report on duty between 26-10-1996 to 31-3- 1998 and remained absent becily fou and tavs continuously . According to làm he informed the woon ef sickness to concerned authority of his mother ,
his own sickness for when he able to
He contends that, though ne informed Isu Provost ackness and sukaus of lús hunily caetphrs
his mother , wife and himself, said was unt
charge sheet dated 8-7 1998 was served
said absenteeism . It is his case that , he reput the end charge sheet giving the reason of he
charge of absenteeism was not tomomi
Management decided to proceed gest ed workman about his said absenteeistett was not informed about his right to ịch tới th ry It is his case that , due to sickness of his toother site and even of his own sickness , he was not cortadend by the Management and in fact Management ought a bave considered it and ought to have discharged the concerned भागखण्ड 36)
भारत का राजपत्र अग 7, 2010 / श्रावण 16 , 1932
winan from the charge of absenceism . According to 5. the gecision taken by the Management on the report The Enquiry Officer and the action taken by the Mirangement be quashed and set aside with directions to Perty to reinstate him with benefits of back wages and muity of service with effect from 8-3-1999.
(3) This is disputed by the 1st Party by filing Written Prement at Exhibit 8 stating and contending that , the cerned workman is in the habit of remaining absent equently It is stated that , he remained absent thorisedly for 271 days during the period from 10-1996 to 3-5-1998 . It is case of the 1st Party that , the concerned workman was convicted earlier also on same dround of absenteeism during the course of his employment withthe 1st Party. It is stated that , he was absent for 217 May from 26-10-1996 to 3-5-1998 . and again remained rosent for 79 days from 14-2-1998 to 3-5-98 It is case of the Sanagement that , on 28 occasions the concerned rkman remained absent on the above dates and in the roove pcriod which affected on the working of the Vianagernent . It is stated that , charge sheet was served , pertunity was given to the concerned workman . It is stated that, even he admitted the charge of absentecism and he not justified his absenterism. It is stated that , the Arvion taken by the Management on the said proved charge absenteeism permit the Management to take action of dismissal which does not require any interference .
(4) Rejoinder is filed by the 2nd Party at Exhibit 9 duying the case of the Management requesting that , he be reinstated with benefits of back wages and continuity of service .
(5 ) In view of the above , Issues were framed at Exhibit Out of those Issues Nos . 1 and 2 , were decided by passing Award on 4-7-2008 holding enquiry fair and proper and finding not perverse .
(6) No Issues remain i.e. issue of quantum of punishment and in that regard i.e. Issue No. 3 and 4 are framed which I answer as follows :
Issues
Findings
Yes
3. Whether the action of the Management of Mumbai Port Trust Mumbai in terminating the service of Promod Gangaram Khot , Tally Clerk by way of removal from service w.e.f. 8-3-99 is legal and justified?
As per the order passed below.
4. What relief the workman is entitled to?
REASONS :
ISSUE NO . 3 :
(7) To challenge termination 2nd Party placed reliance on his affidavit filed at Exhibit 27 , in lieu si examination - in- chief, where he states thar , decision Management to terminate his service is harsh rac account of charge of absenteeism. In the cam that, he was removed froin service on accname of a unauthorized absenteeism . He admit that , even previous he was punished on the same ground of absenteeism Even he admit that , he was absent unauthorisedly for 78 days during 14-2-1998 to 2-5-1998 . He admit that , he did not complaint to anybody when he tried to produce medical certificates in the domestic enquiry. He admit that , he did not complaint when he was not permitted to keep ais certificates on record . On that 2nd party closed his evi dence by filing closing purshis at Exhibit 28. On that no evidence is led by the Management .
(8 ) Written arguments are filed by 2nd Party Exhibit 30 which are replied by the Management by filmg written arguments at Exhibit 31 .
( 9) Perused the written arguments and the evidenc led by the parties . Case of the Management is that , 2nd Party remined absent for 557 days on 55 occasions between 18-9-1993 to 4-10-1996 . 2nd party admit that , car- lier also he was punished on ground of absenteeism . It reveals that , there is no improvement in the concerned workman in his attendance and he again remained abs. for 271 days from 26-10-1996 to 3-5-1998 . That means he admit that he remained absent unauthorisedly . Even case of the Management is that , 2nd Party did not jusufy bus absenteeism and for that enquiry was initiated . Though enquiry was initiated , record and proceedings reveal that , 2nd Party did not place on record the medical certificates of sickness of his mother , wife or of his own sickness to justify his absenteeism . His case is that heimamed absent because of sickness of his mother , his wife and bis own sickness . However , nothing is shown on the record show that , he was having reason to remain absent on account of sickness of his mother , wife and his own sickness . When nothing is on record and when 2nd Party admit that , there is nothing on record to show thay why be was absent . Besides he admit that , previously also he was punished on the charge of absenteeism which shows that he has not taken any hint of earlier punishment and w show any improvement in his attendance vhich lead me to conclude that , the employee of this type does not deserve any leniency and sympathetic approach . When such type ofemployee is remaining absent unauthorisedly for such a long time, in my considered view, this type of behaviours does not qualify him to seek any leniency.
(10) On the ground of absenteeism 2nd Party was convicted . It is not case of the 2nd party that , on such a ground action of conviction of this typ : cannot be taken . Action of the Management on count or absenteeisti is not challenged saying that. Management charo terminate him. Case if the 2nd Partyis that, punishmcIE O 4814
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
termination on ground of absenteeism is harsh one . Service record of the concerned workman reveals that he has no regard to his employment punctuality and duties as he appears interested in remaining absent .
( 11 ) If we consider all this coupled with the case made out by both I am of the view that , the concerned workman is not entitied for any reliefs and does not permit me to interfere in the order of punishment issued by the 1st Party, So I answer this issue to that effect and pass the following order:
ORDER
Reference is rejected with no order as to its costs .
Mumbai,
7th June , 2010 .
A. A. LAD , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 9 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1952.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.पी.डब्ल्यू. ही. के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण न. 1. दिल्ली के पंचाट ( शिकायत नम्बर 40/2006 धारा २१ ए के अंतर्गत ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 7-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-22013/1/2010- आईआ ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 9th July , 2010
S.O. 1952.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, No. 1 , New Delhi (filed under Section 33 - A in the matter of ref. No.40/ 2009) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of CPWD and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 9-7-2010 .
[No. L - 22013 / 1 /2010 - IR (C - II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT NO. L KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI I.D.NO 40/2009 ( Application 33 -A)
The General Secretary , CPWD Workers Union , M/86-88 , Aliganj ,
New Delhi - 110003
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]
Versus
CPWD, East Block,
The S.E ( Co-ordination Circle) (Electrical) R.K. Puram ,
New Delhi - 110066
Management
AWARD
Munni Devi , Suresh Chand , Smt . Sudesh and Ram Raj Sharma are working with Central Public Works Department (hereinafter referred to as the management) as casual beldars since 30-5-92 , 13-2-87 , 28-2-92 and 21-7-86 respectively . They were granted temporary status by the management w.e.f. 1st of September , 1993. Their services were not regularised against group ' D ' posts . They raised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer and on failure of the conciliation proceedings , the appropriate Government referred a dispute to this Tribunal , vide order No. L - 42012 /186 / 2005 - IR ( CM - II ) , New Delhi dated 31-7-2006 , raising a proposition as to whether action of the management in not regularizing their services was legal and justified. The said dispute was pending adjudication before this Tribunal . During pendency of the said dispute for adjudication , the management stopped deduction towards G.P.F. from their salaries w.e.f. July , 2008. The claimants project that action of the management in stopping deduction towards G.P.F. from July, 2008 amounts to change in their service conditions . Hence a complaint was moved before this Tribunal on 19th of August , 2009 under section 33 -A of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( in short the Act ) with a prayer that the management be commanded to make deductions towards G.P.F. and to refund the G.P.F. so deducted with full interest thereon .
2. This complaint , so moved , was registered as an industrial dispute and the management was commanded to present its stand on it .
3. The Management resisted the claim pleading that it is not part of their service conditions to getG.P.F. deducted out of their salaries . There was no industrial dispute pending before this Tribunal , when claimants allege that their service conditions were altered to their detriment . Since they were accorded temporary status , G.P.F. was deducted as per policy of the Government of India upto 30-4-2004 . TheG.P.F. amount so deducted besides interest upto 30-4-2004 have been paid to the claimants vide order dated 15-7-2008 . They are not entitled for deduction of G.P.F. in violation of the policy of the Government of India and interest after 30-4-2004 . Their claim petition is liable to be dismissed .
4. Shri D. Sharma testified facts on behalf of the claimants . Shri V. K. Jain entered the witness box on behalf of the management . No other witness was examined by either of the parties .
Workman
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
5. Arguments were heard at the bar . Shri D. Sharma authorized representative , advanced arguments on behalf of the claimants . Ms. Meenakshi Aggarwal , authorized representative , raised her submissions on behalf of the management . I have given my careful considerations to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record . My findings on issues involved in the controversy are as follows :
6. Shri Sharma has testified that Munni Devi , Suresh Chand Joshi and Ram Raj were entitled to all privileges , available to a permanent employee w.e.f. 1-9-93 , the date when temporary status was granted to them . They were not regularised against a group ' D ' post , hence a dispute was raised , which dispute was referred and pending before this Tribunal for adjudication. During pendency of that dispute the management stopped P. F. deductions w.e.f. August , 2008 , on advent of new pension scheme . He disputes that the management was competent to stop provident fund deduction in pursuance of circular Ex. MW1 / 1 .
7. Shri V. K. Jain does not dispute that the claimants raised a industrial dispute in respect of their regularization against group ' D ' post , which dispute was pending adjudication before this Tribunal . He presents that provident fund deductions of the claimants were stopped in pursuance of circular Ex.MW1 / 1 . No P. F. deductions were made after July, 2008. Entire P. F. deductions and interest accrued on the same upto 30-4-2004 has been paid to the claimants .
8. As projected by Shri Sharma and not disputed by the management , Smt . Munni Devi , Suresh Chand and Ram Raj Sharma were appointed as beldar on 30-5-92 , 13-2-87 and 21-7-86 respectively. They were granted temporary status w.e.f. 1st of september , 93 , on completion of 240 days of continuous service . Under the scheme for grant of temporary status , all casual labours who have rendered one year continuous service are to be given temporary status . Despite grant of temporary status , they are not to be brought on permanent establishment unless they are selected through regular selection process for group ' D ' post . 50% of service rendered by an employee who have been conferred temporary status was to be counted for the purpose of retirement benefits , after regularization of his service . On rendering three years continuous service , after conferment of temporary status , casual labour was to be treated at par with temporary group 'D' employee for the purpose of contribution to General Provident Fund . On regularization of casual labour with temporary status , no substitute in his place was to be appointed . Therefore , the claim for conferring temporary status makes it clear that the said status has been conferred on an employee with a view to grant him financial and retrial benefits , on his being regularized to a substantive post . Till he is regularized on a substantive post , he is
4815
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
deemed not to hold any post on the establishment of the management .
9.G.P.F. Rules 1960 ( in short the Rules) are applicable to all temporary Government servants after continuous service of one years , all re - employed pensioners and all permanent government servants . For applicability of those rules , it is incumbent upon the claimant to show that they were temporary employees working under the management. Aperson on whom a temporary status has been conferred under the scheme of 1993 , is not holding any post under the management . Therefore , an employee with temporary status is not eligible to subscribe under the Rules . Therefore , the Rules are not applicable to an employee on whom a temporary status has been conferred.
10. A new defined contribution pension scheme has been implemented by the government on 1-1-2004 , in place of defined benefit pension scheme . The said scheme is applicable to a government servant joining services on or after 1-1-2004 . To such an employee provisions ofdefined benefit pension scheme and the Rules would not be applicable . When the said new pension scheme came into existence , the Government issued instructions to stop deduction towards G.P.F. from the wages of all casual labour with temporary status w.e.f. 1-1-04 . In continuance ofOM No.22 / 14/ 2008 - ECX , New Delhi dated 15-7-08 the management stopped deduction ofG.P.F. subscription from the wages of the claimants . However , deduction made upto May , 2008 including interest upto 30-4-04 have been refunded to the claimants .
11. Office memorandum dated 15-7-08 makes it clear that interest on G.P.F. deductions from the salary of casual employee , on whom temporary status has been conferred , would be paid upto 30-4-04 only . It is not disputed that interest on G.P.F. deductions were paid to the claimants upto 30-4-04 . Since the Rules are not applicable to the claimants , they cannot claim interest on G.P.F. deductions under the Rules . No existing right was there in favour of the claimants to claim deductions of G. P. F. or in alternative interest on deductions made upto May , 2008. Concession granted to the claimants never ripened into a service condition.
12. Defined contribution pension scheme is more advantageous to the claimants than the old scheme . Hence applicability ofthat scheme grants better service conditions to them. Hence it can not be said that their service conditions were changed to their detriment by the management . The complaint is not maintainable. The same is , accordingly dismissed . An award is passed , in terms referred above .
Dated: 30-6-2010
Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer 4816
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
नई दिल्ली , 9 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1953 , औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.पी.डब्ल्यू.डी के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नं. 1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 26/2006) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-7-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -42012/186/ 2005- आईआर ( सीएम- II ) ]
अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 9th July , 2010
S.O. 1953. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 26/2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- Cum- Labour Court No. 1 , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of CPWD and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 9-7-2010 .
[No. L-42012/ 186 /2005 - IR ( CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT NO . 1 , KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX, DELHI
I.D. No. 26/2006
The General Secretary, CPWD Workers Union , M/86-88 , Aliganj , New Delhi - 110003 .
...Workman
Versus
The S.E. ( Co - ordination Circle ) ( Electrical ) , CPWD , East Block , R. K. Puram ,
New Delhi - 110066 .
...Management
AWARD
Central Public Works Department ( hereinafter referred to as the management ) employees casual labours to carry out casual jobs . On 10th of September , 93 guidelines were issued for grant of temporary status to casual employees , as well as for their regularization against group ' D ' post . Casual employees , who were employed prior to 19th of November , 85 were regularized in pursuance of the aforesaid policy . Shri Ram Raj Sharma was appointed as casual beldar on 21st of July , 86 , Suresh Chand Joshi was appointed on 3-4-87 while Smt . Munni Devi was appointed as casual beldar on 30th of May , 92 by the Management . Smt . Sudesh was appointed as casual beldar on 28-2-1994 .
[PART 3 ]
::
They were granted temporary status in pumice of the policy referred above , but were not considered for regularization against group ' D ' post . They raised dumand with the management for their regularizacon aganstyrm 'D' posts, which demand was not accepted Thursda dispute before the Conciliation Officer . SUOM proceedings failed , the appropriate Governmed the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudicatio..
No.L - 42012 /186 / 2005 - IR ( CM - II ) , New
31-7-2006, with the following terms :
" Whether the action of the managen
New Delhi in not regularizing
Smt . Munni Devi and 3 others ( as pr
Casual Labour Beldar in temporar
and justified ? If not, to what relicf 13 are entitled to and from which date
2. Claim statement was filed on best pleading therein that Smt . Munni Devi casual beldar on 30-5-92 . Suresh Chand Joru on 3-4-87 and Ran Raj Sharına was appr beldar on 21-7-86 . It has been presented thon was not interested in presenting her claim . are working from last many years and have b temporary status w.e.f. 1-9-94 by the mar rendering 3 years services in temporary stat employee is treated at par with a regular emploслода the pensionary benefits . Superintending Coordination Circle ( Electrical ) of the inanatA is responsible for maintaining seniority list of cas their regularization on group ' D ' post raher promotions . From the last 10 years various beldes Ve been promoted to skilled category such anders , Mason , Carpenter and Painter etc. and there are abou : 600 vacancies lying vacant in group ' D ' posts . Management is not taking any steps in regularizing servic claimants despite various vacancies lying vacant for appointment of group ' D ' post . It has been claimsed that the aforesaid claimants may be regularized w.e.f 1.9.96 . the date when they completed three years continuous services , on grant of temporary status. the 3. The management resisted the claim, put forward by the claimants , pleading that they have been granted temporary status w.e.f. 1st of September , 1993. No sanctioned post exists in the category of beldar , hence they cannot be regularized . It is admitted that as per office memorandum No.51016 / 2/ 90 -Estt . ( C ) dated 10th of September , 93 , two out of three vacancies in group D' cadre , irrespective of office were the casual labour employees have been working , would be filled as per existing recruitment rules in accordance with the instructions issued by department of Personnel and Training from amongst casual workers with temporary status . It has been projected that a ban has been imposed by Ministry of Finance vide its order dated 5-8-99 for creation of new posts . Since ban is in existence , no vacancy [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
is available for regularization of the claimants . It is prayed that the claim petition may be dismissed .
4. Suresh Chand Joshi , ( WWI ) , Ram Raj Sharma (WW2 ) and Smt . Munni Devi ( WW3 ) were examined on 23-10-09, The claimants had closed their evidence on that day Since none appeared no opportunity could be accorded to the management to cross examine the aforesaid witnesses .
5. Laxman Singh , Head Clerk appeared before the Tribunal on 23-10-09 in post lunch Session and requested for an opportunity to cross examined the aforesaid witnesses . He projected that the management would take steps in that regard by way of moving an application . Accordingly application , moved by the management , was granted. Subsequently the witnesses , referred above , did not produce themselves for cross examination . It resulted that no opportunity was according to the management to purify testimony of the aforesaid witnesses by an ordeal of cross examination . Hence depositions of the aforesaid witresses cannot be read in evidence against the management .
6. Shri V.K.Jain was examined on behalf of the management . Besides his testimony Shri V.K. Jain produced documents , which were not disputed on behalf of the claimants . Those documents were exhibited as Ex . Wl to Ex . W4 . No other witness was examined on behalf of the management .
7. None came forward on behalf of the claimants to advance arguments . No one raised submissions on behalf of the management too . I have considered pleadings of the parties and evidence produced over the record . My findings on issues involved in the controversy are as foliows
8. Shri V. Jain swears in his testimony that claimants were gracted temporary status w.e.f. 1-9-1993 . He presents that beldar , in excess of sanctioned strength are employed by the management . As per existing policy issued by the Department of Personnel and Training vide OM No.51016/ 2/90 - Est dated 10-9-93 , two out of three vacancies in proup 'D' cadre , irrespective of offices where casual labours have been working , would be filled as per extent ecruitment rules and in accordance with the instructions issued by the Department of Personnel and Training from armongst casual workers with temporary status . Since names of the claimants are not ripe for seniority for recruitment to group ' D ' post , they cannot be considered for regularisation . There is no question of granting gratuity and pension to them. Dispute referred by the appropriate Government is without application of mind . During the course of his cross - examination , he concedes that on 10-7-2009 Government of India had issued a policy for regularization of casual workers , copy of which policy is Ex . MWI/ 3 . In pursuance of the said policy name of workers have been sent for regularization, which list is Ex.MW1/4 .
4817
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010 / श्रावण 16 , 1932
He further concedes that there are 504 vacant posts as detailed in Ex.MWI/W2 .
9. It is not a matter of dispute that all the four claimants were accorded temporary status w.e.f. Ist of September , 1993. There is no dispute that since then they are in continuous service of the management . It is also not a matter of dispute that two out of every three vacancies in group ' D ' cadre would be filled from amongst the casual workers with temporary status . Shri Jain concedes that a policy for regularization has been issued by Government of India on 10th of July , 09 , which is Ex.MWI/ 3 . Therefore , outof the facts projected by Shri Jain , it emerges over the record that Government of India has circulated a policy on 10-7-09 for regularization of casual workers .
10. List Ex.MW1/ 4 was prepared , in which list names of Suresh Chand , Smt . Sudesh and Smt . Munni Devi do appear , for regularization against group ' D ' posts . Shri Jain further concedes that name of Ram Raj Sharma was also sent for regularization in pursuance of the policy referred above . Shri Jain concedes that 504 vacant posts exist as on 1-12-2009 . Consequently it is evident that vacant posts are available and claimants are senior enough to be covered for regularization against those vacant posts . Policy Ex.MWI /I creates a claim in favour of these claimants for their regularization against Group ' D ' post . That claim stands fortified by policy dated 10-7-2009 copy of which is Ex.MW1 /3 , issued subsequently . Hence I have no hesitation to commend the claimants are entitled for regularization against group ' D ' post . Management is , therefore , commanded to regularise the services of all the four claimants against group ' D ' post from the dates when vacancies were available , but in any case w.e.f. 1-12-2009 .
11. Circular No. 29 / 77 /2000 - ECX , New Delhi , dated 26-6-2006 was issued by the Director General ( Works) , CPWD , in respect of payment of gratuity to its casual , hand receipt and muster roll workers under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 ( in short the Act) . The said circular makes it clear that the matter was examined in consultation with the Ministry of Urban Development and Ministry of Labour and it was clarified that the Act is applicable to casual , muster roll , hand receipt and daily rated workers of the CPWD . Consequently all ADVs , CS , SCS , S.C. Coordination , Executive Engineer Directorate of Horticulture , Additional Directorate of Horticulture , Deputy Director of Horticulture , All Deputy Welfare Labour Commissioners and Assistant Labour Welfare Commissioners were requested to make payment ofgratuity to casual muster roll , hand receipt and daily rated workers of CPWD as admissible under the Act . It was further mentioned therein that the current / pending court cases on the similar issue may be defended or got settled accordingly. Therefore , it is evident that the management admits the claim of all casual muster roll , hand receipt or daily rated workers of the CPWD for payment of gratuity under the Act .
4818
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVAΝΑ 16 , 1932
12. Whether service rendered by the workman , which was paid from contingency, can be counted towards pension ? For an answer , provisions of CCS Pension Rules , 1972 ( in short the Rules) are to be considered . Rule 14 of the said Rules makes provision in that regard. It emerge out ofthe provisions of rule 14 that periods of service paid from contingencies do not count as qualifying service for pension . However Govt . of India took a decision in May , 1968 and an office memorandum was issued on 14-5-1968 , wherein it is detailed that in some cases , employees paid from contingencies , employed in types of work requiring services of whole- time workers and are paid on monthly rates of pay or daily rates computed and paid on monthly basis and on being found fit brought on to regular establishment . The question whether in such cases service paid from contingencies should be allowed to count for pension and if so to what extent has been considered in the National Council and in pursuance of the recommendation of the Council , it has been decided that half the service paid from contingencies will be allowed to count toward pension at the time of absorption in regular employment subject to the following conditions , viz.- (a) Service paid from contingencies should have been , in ajob involving whole- time employment (and not part - time for a portion of the day) .
(b) Service paid from contingencies should be in a type ofwork or job for which regular posts could have been sanctioned , e.g. , malis , chowkidars , khalasis, etc.
(c) The service should have been one for which the payment is made either on monthly or daily rates computed and paid on a monthly basis , which though not analogous to the regular scale of pay should bear some relation in the matter of pay to those being paid for similar jobs being performed by staffs in regular establishments .
(d) The service paid from contingencies should have been continuous and followed by absorption in regular employment without a break.
(e) Subject to the above conditions being fulfilled , the weightage for past service paid from contingencies will be limited to the period after 1st January , 1961 for which authentic records of service may be available , Reference can be made to office memorandum No.G.I. , M.F. , O.M.No.12 ( 1 ) -EV/ 68 , dated the 14th May , 1968 .
13. Here in this case it is not a matter of dispute that the workmen , who were paid from contingencies , were performing whole time job with the management since 30-5-92, 3-4-87 , 31-7-86 and 28-2-94 respectively . Their services are ordered to be regularized at detailed in precceding sections of this award . They performed functions analogue to regular employees till the date
[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] their regularization , as ordered . Their services with the management were continuous without any break . They satisfied all the conditions laid down in the aforesaid office memorandum issued by the Govt . of India . Hence , the management is under an obligation to comply the said office memorandum and count service of the workmen for the purpose of pension .
14. In view of the facts detailed above it is expedient to command the management to record services rendered by Smt . Munni Devi , Shri Ram Raj Sharma , Smt . Sudesh and Mr.Suresh Chand Joshi as muster roll employee in their service books , which services would be taken into account for payment of gratuity under the Act ,at the time of their superannuation or death , as the contingency arise as well as for calculation of qualifying service for pension under the Pension Rules 1972 , and regularize their services from the dates when vacancies were available for them or in any case from 1-12-2009 . An award is accordingly passed. It may be sent to the appropriate Government for publication. Dated: 30-6-2010
Dr. R. K. YADAV , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 9 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1954.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार विजया बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय एरनाकुलम के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 12/2010 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-7-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -12012/ 223/ 1994- आईआर ( बी- II ) ] अनिल कुमार शर्मा , अनुभाग अधिकारी New Delhi , the 9th July, 2010
S.O. 1954. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 12/2010 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- Cum - Labour Court , Ernakulam now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Vijay Bank and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 8-7-2010 .
[No. L - 12012/223 / 1994 - IR (B - II ) ! ANIL KUMARK SHARMA , Section Officer ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : Shri P. L. Norbert, B.A. , LL. B., Presiding Officer
Wednesday the 30th day of June , 2010/ 9th Ashadain , 1932 ) L.D. 12/2010 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
4819
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/श्रावण 16 , 1932
(I. D. 21/1994 of Industrial Tribunal , Kollam) Union : The Joint Secretary , Vijaya Bank Worker's Organisation, Triplicane, Madras -05.
By Adv . Shri Ashok B. Shenoy.
Management : The General Manager (PAS) ,
Vijaya Bank , Personnel Department, HeadOffice, Bangalore 560001 By Adv . Shri R. S. Kalkura .
This case coming up for hearing on 30-6-2010 , this Tribunal - cum-Labour Court on the same day passed thefollowing.
AWARD
This is a reference made under Section 10 ( 1 )( d) of Industrial Disputes Act challenging the disciplinary action taken against the workman Sri T. S. Ashok Kumar , a bank clerk . by a preliminary order dated 16-6-2010 the enquiry was found to be invalid on account of violation of the principles of natural justice and denial of reasonable opportunity to the employee . Thereafter the case was posted for further steps by the management to 24-6-2010. Both sides remained absent on that day and the case was adjourned to this day for further steps by the management. Again the management as well as the union are absent . There is a direction by Hon'ble High Court to dispose of the ID within a period of six months . The file was pending in the Industrial Tribunal Kollam and was received by this court only on 14-12-2009. The management does not appear to be interested in the dispute. Since the enquiry to be invalid there is no material on record to prove the charges levelled against the workman. In the circumstances I hold that the discilinary action is unsustainable and the order of punishment cannot stand.
In the result an award is passed finding that the action of the management in imposing the punishment of stoppage of three increments permanently on Sri T. S. Ashok Kumar , the workman is not legal and justified. He is entitled to increments that were stopped and salary and other benefits withheld on account of punishment .
The award will come into force one month after its publication in the official gazette .
Dictated to the Personnel Assistant, transcribed and typed by her , corrected and passed by me on this the 30th day ofJune , 2010.
P. L. NORBERT, Presiding Officer
Appendix
Nil .
Witness for the Union
Nil .
Witness for the Management
Nil
Exhibit for the Union
Exhibit for the management
M1 Enquiry File.
2904 G1/2010-18
नई दिल्ली , 12 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1955.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार विजया बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय बंगलौर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 47/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-7-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल. - 12012/65 /2001- आई आर ( बी- II ) ] अनिल कुमार शर्मा, अनुभाग अधिकारी New Delhi , the 12th July, 2010
S.O. 1955. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 47/2001 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-Cum- Labour Court, Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Vijaya Bank and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 12-7-2010 .
[No. L- 12012/65/2001 - IR (B- II) ] ANIL KUMAR SHARMA , Section Officer ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE
Dated the, 30th June , 2010
PRESENT : Shri S.N. NAVALGUND , Presiding Officer C.R. No. 47/2001
:
Shri Ramesh , S/o Basappa, Near Anjanay Temple , Torangallu , PO, Sandur TQ, Reilary
1Party The Att. Regional Manager,
Vijaya Bank , ist Floor, Post Box No. 17, Lamington Road ,
:
HUBLI -580020
IIParty
AWARD
1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2A ofSection 10 ofthe Industriai Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) has referred this dispute vide order No. L- 12012/ 65/ 2001- IR(B - II) dated 10/16-07-2001 for adjudication on the following Schedule:
"Whether the action of the respondent management bank M/ s . Vijaya Bank is justified in terminating the services of the workman Shri K. Ramesh w.e.f. 3-1-2001 ? If not what relief the workmen is entitled to?"
2. After receiving the Claim Statement of the first party and the counter statement of the second party and THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANΝΑ 16 , 1932
Seading their evidence and at the instance of the conc party , the proceeding was reopened for further 2011-06-2010 the learned counsel appearing for my filed a memo to the effect that the first as been apointed as a Probationary Peon in the staff cadre at the Regional Office , Bangalore dat accordingly the first party has reported on thons with the copy of his joining report dated On 11-06-2010 since the first party and his pot present , it was posted for their say to dandon that date the Junior Advocate for Naik appearing for the first party submitted to matter as per the memo filed by the Second Party 2010 Thus in view of the settlement between the od the first party being appointed as Probationary Sabordinate Staff Cadre at the Regional Office , Pigallush of the second party and also reporting to he reference is liable to be rejected as settled out of b . De result , I pass the following Award :
AWARD
reference is rejected in view of the settlement De the parties outside the tribunal . No costs .
taed to PA transcribed by her corrected and 0030-06-2010 ) .
S. N. NAVALGUND , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 13 जुलाई , 2010
भा.38 1956. - औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार चीफ पोस्ट ल मोटर सर्विसेस के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों कारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में ओद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सी/ आर/ 45 /98 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो 7/2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल 40012/26/ 96- आईआर ( डीयू) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 13th July , 2010
Enspire Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Bereny publishes the award ( Ref . No. CGIT/ 956. -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Roothe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- out Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure in Dispute between the employers in relation nent of Chief Post Master General . Mail torices and their workm .. , which was received mallovemment on 13-07-2010 .
[No. 1-40012/26/ 96 - IR ( DU ) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
CHORETHE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT OFSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
No.CGIT /LC / R/ 45 / 98
dime Officer : Shri Mohd . Shakir Hasan
st Divisional Secretary,
[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] Railway Mail Service Karamchari Sangh ,
M.P. Circle,
Workman/Union Bhopal-462001
Versus
Chief Post Master General , M.P. Circle , Dak Seva Bhawan , Hoshangabad Road , Bhopal
Management
AWARD
Passed on this 3rd day of May , 2010 1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L -40012 /26 / 96 - IR ( DU ) dated 2-3-98 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :-
"Whether the action of the management of Chief PostMaster General , Mail Motor Services , Bhopal in not paying the overtime allowance and also changing the service condition of Mail Peon to Chowkidar in respect of Shri Attar Sing Malviya w.e.f. 7-7-91 to 7-8-93 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief these workmen is entitled for ? "
2. The Workman/ Union did not appear inspite of proper notice . Lastly the then Tribunal proceeded the reference exparate against the Workman / Union on 10-1-2006.
3. The management appeared and filed his written statement . The case of the management is that the claim of the workman was with regard to non - payment of off duty salary/ payment for 44 days . It is stated that subsequently the workman filed an application on 2-9-2005 and the copy of the said application was also served to the management which is marked as Annexure R - 1 wherein it is admitted that he had received payment of 22 days and 22 days were adjusted in leave and now there is no grievances against the department . It is submitted that no dispute award be passed .
4. Onpersual of the record , it appears that the case is proceding exparte against the Workman / Union . The copy of the application is filed by the management which is marked as Annexure R - 1 that the workman had admitted that he had received all his claim . This shows that there is no dispute left between the parties . This is a case of no dispute. Accordingly the reference is answered .
5. In the result , no dispute award is passed without any order to costs .
6. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules .
MOHD . SHAKIR HASAN , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 13 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1957.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत संचार भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
निगम लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय , जोधपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या.......... को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-7-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-40012 / 78/2006- आई आर ( डीयू) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 13th July , 2010
S.O. 1957. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Jodhpur as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 13-7-2010 .
[No. L -40012/ 78 / 2006 - IR ( DU) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy.
अनुबन्ध
औद्योगिक विवाद अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय , जोधपुर पीठासीन अधिकारी श्री एच. आर. नागौरी , आर.एच.जे.एस. औद्योगिक विवाद ( केन्द्रीय ) संख्या : 1 सन् 2007
श्री दिनेश कुमार पुत्र श्री मांगीलाल हरिजन , हरिजन बस्ती, झोंपड़ी रोड , सिरोही । ...प्रार्थी
बनाम
दी जनरल मैनेजर टेलीकॉम , भारत संचार निगम लि. सिरोही (राज. ) ... अप्रार्थी उपस्थिति : -
( 1 ) प्रार्थी के प्रतिनिधि- श्री गिरीश सांखला उपस्थित ( 2 ) अप्रार्थी के प्रतिनिधि- श्री ललित व्यास उपस्थित
अधिनिर्णय
दिनांक , 22 मार्च , 2010
1. भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय ने अपनी अधिसूचना क्रमांक एल. - 40012 /78/2006 - आई आर ( डीयू) नई दिल्ली दिनांक 9-1-2007 के द्वारा निम्न विवाद अधिनिर्णय हेतु इस न्यायालय को प्रेषित किया गया है :-
"Whether the action of the management of the General Manager , Telecom , BSNL , in terminating the services of their workman Shri Dinesh Kumar S/o Shri Mangi Lal w.e.f. 3-3-97 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief these workman is entitled to ? " 2. प्रार्थी ने अपने मांग पत्र में यह उल्लेख किया कि उसकी नियुक्ति अप्रार्थी नियोजक के अधीन दिनांक 18-11-1989 को अंशकालीन श्रमिक के रूप में फराश/सफाई कर्मचारी के रूप में हुई थी । प्रार्थी ने अपनी नियुक्ति तिथि से लेकर उक्त पद पर दिनांक 3-3-1997 तक अप्रार्थी के अधीन कार्य किया । उसका सन्तोषपूर्ण रही , लेकिन अप्रार्थी नियोजक ने विना किसा दिनांक 3-3-1997 को प्रार्थी की सेवाएं मौखिक आदेशश कर दी । प्रार्थी ने अप्रार्थी नियोजक के कार्यालय एक का श्रमिक के रूप में प्रतिदिन लगभग चार घण्टे फराश/ सफाइवाला का रूप में कार्य किया । प्रार्थी श्रमिक प्रतिदिन लगभग चार घण्टे इस पद पर कार्य करने के पश्चात् अपनी सेवाएं अप्रार्थी नियोजक के निर्देशानुसार टेलीग्राम वितरण के लिए देता था । प्रार्थी ने यह उल्लेख किया है कि वह पढ़ा - लिखा नवयुवक होने के कारण अप्रार्थी नियोजक के आदेशानुसार उक्त चार घण्टे का कार्य करने के पश्चात् टेलीग्राभ वितरण का काम करता था और इसके बदले प्रार्थी नियोजक द्वारा प्रार्थी को नियमित वेतन भुगतान किया जाता था । इस प्रकार प्रार्थी नं यह उल्लेख किया है कि उसके द्वारा लगभग आठ घण्टे पूरा कार्य किया जाता था । प्रार्थी ने यह उल्लेख किया है कि दिनांक 3-3-1997 को उसकी सेवाएं समाप्त करने के पूर्व उसे किसी प्रकार का कोई आरोप- पत्र नोटिस अथवा नोटिस के बदले मुआवजा आदि अदा नहीं किया गया ।
3. प्रार्थी ने अपने प्रार्थना- पत्र में आगे यह उल्लेख किया है कि उसने अपनी सेवा समाप्ति के आदेश दिनांक 3-3-1997 के विरुद्ध एक प्रार्थना- पत्र ओ . ए. नं. 115/97 केन्द्रीय प्रशासनिक अधिकर जोधपुर बैंच जोधपुर के समक्ष प्रस्तुत किया था वह प्रार्थना - पत्र भ नम्बर पर दिनेश कुमार बनाम भारत सरकार तथा अन्य के नाम में ५० हुआ था । इसका निस्तारण उक्त अधिकरण ने दिनांवः 23-3-190 को इस निर्देश के साथ किया कि अप्रार्थी नियोजक प्राथों को नियुक्ति देने हेतु प्रकरण पर चार माह के भीतर नियमानुसार करत करे । प्रार्थी ने यह उल्लेख किया है कि उसने उक्त आदेश दि 23-3-1997 की अनुपालना में अप्रार्थी नियोजक के समक्ष कारभार प्रार्थना- पत्र प्रस्तुत किये तथा प्रार्थना की कि उसम मजदूरी वेतन पर नियुक्ति प्रदान की जाय । अप्रार्थी निवारक उ आश्वासन देते रहे कि विभाग के मुख्यालय से पार्टटाईम मजदू फुलटाईम दैनिक मजदूर बनाने की अनुमति प्राप्त होते ही उसे नियु प्रदान कर दी जायेगी ।
4. प्रार्थी ने अपने प्रार्थना- पत्र में आगं यह भी उल्लेख किया कि अप्रार्थी नियोजक द्वारा दिनांक 2-7-1990 को प्राथी के कावाद नवम्बर 1989 से जुलाई 1990 तक का एक प्रमाण पत्र जारी कि अप्रार्थी नियोजक ने एक पत्र दिनांक 21-6-1996 को भी जगी क था जिसमें अप्रार्थी ने यह स्वीकार किया था कि अप्रार्थी नियोजक अधीन दो पद रिक्त हैं तथा प्रार्थी श्रमिक ने दिनांक 18-11-1979 लगातार फराश/सफाई वाला के पद पर कार्य किया इराक गाथको वितरण का कार्य भी प्रार्थी द्वारा किया जाता था । यह भी अनुनाि किया गया कि अप्रार्थी कार्यालय में प्रार्थी श्रमिकको स्थायी ₹ १२ तार मैसेन्जर के रूप में कार्य करने हेतु आवश्यकता है।अर नियोजक ने दिनांक 15-7-2002 तथा दिनांक 132 1097 गये पत्रों में प्रार्थी श्रमिक के सेत्र, भिलेख के सन्दर्भ में स्वीकृ कथन का उल्लेख है । अप्रार्थी नियोजक ने दिनांक 9-9-193 एक प्रमाण - पत्र जारी किया जिसमें प्रार्थी श्रमिक अप्रार्थी विभाग प 4822
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVAΝΑ 16 , 1932
[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] दिनांक 9-11-1989 से प्रतिदिन तीन घण्टा सफाई/फराश कार्य हेतु कार्यरतू था । प्रार्थी श्रमिक ने पूर्णकालीन कर्मचारी के रूप में नियुक्ति हेतु दिनांक 22-9-2005 को महाप्रबंधक भारत संचार निगम सिरोही को पत्र लिखकर निवेदन किया कि विभागीय पत्र संख्या हैं 57/पीटी/2002/85 दिनांक 13-8-2002 के अंतर्गत प्रार्थी श्रामक के प्रकरण पर कोई कार्यवाही नहीं की गई । प्रार्थी श्रमिक ने यह उल्लेख किया है कि उसने वर्षभर में 1095 घण्टे से अधिक कार्य किया । इस सन्दर्भ में अप्राथर्थी नियोजक ने जत्र दिनांक 14-5-2004 , पत्र दिनांक 15-9-2004 , पत्र दिनांक 6-8-2004 तथा पत्र दिनांक 30-9-2003 के जरिए सभी अंशकालीन कर्मचारियों को पूर्णकालीन कर्मचारी बनाने के लिए अनुमोदन किया था ।
5. प्रार्थी ने अपने मांग पत्र में आगे यह उल्लेख किया है कि प्रार्थी श्रमिक ने 13-2-2001 को अप्रार्थी नियोजक के समक्ष एक प्रतिवेदन प्रस्तुत कर स्वंय को पूर्णकालीन कर्मचारी के पद पर स्थापित करने हेतु निवेदन किया था । दिनांक 12-7-2004 को भी उसने इस हंतु पत्र लिखा था । प्रार्थी ने यह भी उल्लेख किया है कि इसके उपरान्त भी अप्रार्थी नियोजक ने उसे सेवा में नहीं लिया । प्रार्थी ने यह भी उल्लेख किया है कि अप्रार्थी नियोजक द्वारा प्रार्थी से कई कनिष्ठ अंशकालीन कर्मचारियों को पूर्णकालीन कर्मचारी बना दिया गया , एकिन प्राथी को सेवा में पुर्नस्थापित नहीं किया तथा उसे पूर्णकालीन कर्मचारी नहीं बनाया । प्रार्थी ने यह भी उल्लेख किया है कि उसकी समाप्ति के पूर्व अप्रार्थी नियोजक ने औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम की धारा 25 एफ की पालना नहीं की । प्राथी ने यह भी उल्लेख किया है कि अप्रार्थी नियोजक ने उसकी सेवा समाप्ति के पश्चात् अन्य नये श्रमिकों की भर्ती की है , लेकिन प्रार्थी श्रमिक को पुनः सेवा का अवसर प्रदान नहीं किया गया । अप्रार्थी नियोजक ने कोई वरिष्ठता सूचि का प्रकाशन भी नहीं किया । इस प्रकार प्रार्थी ने यह उल्लेख किया है कि अप्रार्थी नियोजक ने औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम की धारा 25 जी तथा 25 एच एवं नियम -77 के प्रावधानों का उल्लंघन किया है । पार्टटाईम भजदूर को फुलटाईम मजदूर बनाने के सम्बन्ध में जारी पत्र दिनांक 30-9-2003 तथा 21-10-2003 का परिलाभ प्रार्थी को नहीं दिया है । यह सभी तथ्य श्रम शोषण तथा भेदभावपूर्ण नीति के परिचायक हैं । प्रार्थी अपनी सेवा समाप्ति के बाद से ही बेरोजगार बैठा है । उक्त आधारों पर प्रार्थी ने यह प्रार्थना की है कि उसे सेवा में पुर्नस्थापित किया जावे तथा उसकी सेवाएं पूर्णकालीन कर्मचारी के पद पर नियमित करते हुए पिछला समस्त बकाया वेतन तथा परिलाभ दिलाये जावें।
6. अप्रार्थी ने अपने प्रतिउत्तर में यह उल्लेख किया है कि अप्रार्थी भारत संचार निगम लि. का गठन भारत सरकार के नोटिफिकेशन के अर्न्तगत वर्ष 2000 में हुआ है और इस प्रकार प्रार्थी को सेवा से पृथक करने की तारीख 1-4-1997 को अप्रार्थी भारत संचार निगम लि. का कोई अस्तित्व नहीं था । अप्रार्थी ने यह भी उल्लेख किया है कि इस आधार पर प्रार्थी अप्रार्थी निगम से कोई अनुतोष प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी नहीं है । अप्रार्थी ने यह भी उल्लेख किया है कि प्रार्थी ने जिला महाप्रबन्धक भारत संचार निगम लि. को पक्षकार बनाया है , लेकिन जिला महाप्रबंधक नियोक्ता की परिभाषा में नहीं आता है ।
अप्रार्थी ने यह उल्लेख किया है कि भारत संचार निगम लि. में सफाई कर्मचारी के रूप में नियुक्ति देने हेतु निर्धारित नियम एवं प्रक्रिया है उन्हीं नियमों तथा निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के अंतर्गत किसी भी व्यक्ति को सफाई कर्मचारी अथवा अन्य किसी पद पर नियुक्ति दी जा सकती है । स्वयं प्रार्थी के अनुसार प्रार्थी को नियुक्ति देने से पूर्व नियमानुसार निर्धारित प्रक्रिया नहीं अपनाई गई । प्रार्थी की नियुक्ति निर्धारित प्रक्रिया एवं नियमों के विपरीत होने के कारण पुनः सेवा में लिये जाने का अधिकारी नहीं है । प्रार्थी ने यह विवाद असाधारण विलम्ब से उठाया है और इस कारण भी प्रार्थी कोई अनुतोष प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी नहीं है । अप्रार्थी ने यह तथ्य अस्वीकार किया है कि प्रार्थी को अप्रार्थी विभाग में दिनांक 8-11-1989 को अंशकालीन श्रमिक के रूप में फराश/सफाई कर्मचारी के पद पर नियुक्ति दी तथा उसके बाद से प्रार्थी ने लगातार कार्य किया । अप्रार्थी ने यह उल्लेख किया है कि वास्तविक तथ्य यह है कि अप्रार्थी विभाग ने प्रार्थी को पूर्णतया अस्थायी तौर पर आकस्मिक मजदूर के रूप में पार्टटाईम प्रतिदिन दो घण्टे के लिए सफाई कार्य करने के लिए दिनांक 18-11-1989 को सुमेरपुर कार्यालय में रखा गया था । प्रार्थी को कभी भी श्रमिक के रूप में नियुक्ति नहीं दी गई । प्रार्थी को कभी नियुक्ति नहीं दी गई और इस कारण यह तथ्य गलत बताया है कि प्रार्थी की सेवाएं दिनांक 3-3-1997 को समाप्त कर दी । यह तथ्य भी अस्वीकार किया है कि प्रार्थी द्वारा अंशकालीन श्रमिक के रूप में चार घण्टे प्रतिदिन फराश /सफाई कर्मचारी के पद पर सेवाएं दी गई । यह तथ्य भी गलत बताया कि उक्त चार घण्टे की सेवाएं देने के पश्चात् प्रार्थी ने टेलीग्राम वितरण का कार्य भी चार घन्टे तक करके उसके द्वारा कुल आठ घण्टे कार्य किया जाता था । यह तथ्य भी अस्वीकार किया है कि अप्रार्थी विभाग द्वारा प्रार्थी को नियमित रूप से वेतन का भुगतान किया जाता था । अप्रार्थी ने यह भी उल्लेख किया है कि प्रार्थी को सुमेरपुर में सफाई के कार्य हेतु प्रारम्भ में प्रतिदिन दो घण्टे के लिए अंशकालीन मजदूर के रूप में अस्थायी तौर पर रखा गया था । जब - जब सफाई के कार्य की आवश्यकता होती तब - तब प्रार्थी से सफाई का कार्य करवाया जाता तथा इसके अलावा स्वयं प्रार्थी भी अपनी इच्छा से कभी कार्य पर आता व कभी नहीं आता था । प्रार्थी को दी गई मजदूरी का भुगतान किसी कदर मासिक वेतन की परिभाषा में नहीं आता है । प्रार्थी को प्रतिदिन किये गये कार्यों के घण्टों के हिसाब से प्रति घण्टे की दर से मजदूरी का भुगतान किया गया था । दिनांक 3-3-1997 को विभाग में कार्य की आवश्यकता नहीं होने के कारण प्रार्थी को कार्य हेतु नहीं बुलवाया गया । प्रार्थी के कार्य की प्रकृति को देखते हुए इसे सेवा समाप्ति की परिभाषा में नहीं माना जा सकता । अप्रार्थी ने यह उल्लेख किया है कि इस कारण प्रार्थी को छंटनी का मुआवजा अथवा एक माह का नोटिस देने की आवश्यकता नहीं थी । अप्रार्थी निगम ने यह भी उल्लेख किया है कि केंद्रीय प्रशासनिक अधिकरण , जोधपुर के निर्देशों की पालना में अप्रार्थी निगम ने नियमों के तहत यह पाया है कि प्रार्थी द्वारा पूर्णतया अंशकालीन मजदूर के रूप में किसी भी वर्ष में 19 से 20 घण्टे तक कार्य नहीं किया गया और इस कारण नियमों के अंर्तगत प्रार्थी अस्थायी मजदूर का दर्जा प्राप्त करने की पात्रता नहीं रखता है । इसकी सूचना अप्रार्थी निगम ने दिनांक 12-1-1998 को पत्र के जरिये प्रार्थी को दे दी थी , उसमें यह भी लिखा गया था कि 4823 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
अधिकरण , जोधपुर का निर्णय दिनांक 23-9-1997 , प्रदर्श-2 पत्र दिनांक 14-5-2004 , प्रदर्श -3 पत्र दिनांक 15-9-2004 , प्रदर्श-4 पत्र दिनांक 6-8-2004 , प्रदर्श -5 पत्र दिनांक10-9-2003 , प्रदर्श-6 पत्र दिनांक 15-7-2002 , प्रदर्श-7 पत्र दिनांक 13-2-1997 , प्रदर्श-8 पत्र दिनांक 13-2-1997 , प्रदर्श-9 पत्र दिनांक 21-6-1996 , प्रदर्श-10 पत्र दिनांक 9-9-1993 , प्रदर्श -11 प्रार्थी द्वारा अप्रार्थी को प्रेषित प्रार्थना- पत्र दिनांक 13-2-2001 , प्रदर्श-12 प्रार्थी द्वारा अप्रार्थी को प्रेषित प्रार्थना- पत्र दिनांक 12-7-2004 तथा प्रदर्श -13 प्रार्थी द्वारा अप्रार्थी को लिखा गया पत्र दिनांक 22-9-2005 प्रस्तुत कर प्रदर्श करवाये गये । अप्रार्थी की ओर से मुकेश चन्द नवाल का शपथ - पत्र प्रस्तुत किया । प्रार्थी ने उससे जिरह की । प्रलेखीय साक्ष्य में अप्रार्थी की ओर से प्रदर्श एम -1 प्रार्थी द्वारा किये गये कार्य का विवरण दिनांक 2-7-1990 प्रदर्श एम-2 अप्रार्थी द्वारा प्रार्थी को प्रेषित पत्र दिनांक 12-1-1998 , प्रदर्श एम -3 अप्रार्थी द्वारा प्रार्थी को प्रेषित पत्र दिनांक 29-9-2005 तथा प्रदर्श एम -4 अप्रार्थी द्वारा प्रार्थी को प्रेषित पत्र दिनांक 14-12-2004 प्रस्तुत कर प्रदर्श करवाये ।
गया । 8. बहस उभय - पक्ष सुनी गई । पत्रावली का अवलोन किया
9. प्रार्थी ने अपने प्रार्थना - पत्र तथा शपथ- पत्र में स्वंय की अप्रार्थी नियोजक के यहां अंशकालीन श्रमिक के रूप में नियुक्त होने का तथ्य उल्लेख किया है । अप्रार्थी ने भी अपने प्रति उत्तर में यह तथ्य स्वीकार किया है कि प्रार्थी की नियुक्ति अंशकालीन श्रमिक के रूप में की गई थी । अतः पत्रावली पर उपलब्ध तथ्यों तथा साक्ष्य से यह तथ्य प्रमाणित है कि अप्रार्थी नियोजक ने प्रार्थी की नियुक्ति अंशकालीन श्रमिक के रूप में की थी । विद्वान प्रतिनिधि प्रार्थी ने . हमारे समक्ष निम्न दो विधिक दृष्टांत प्रस्तुत किये हैं ।
1. यशवन्तसिंह यादव बनाम राजस्थान राज्य आर.एल.आर. 1989 ( 1 ) पेज 156 माननीय न्यायालय ने इस विधिक दृष्टांत में निम्न सिद्धांत प्रतिपादित किया है : -
" Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , S.2 ( s ) -Whether " part time " employee is " workman " as defined u/ s 2(s ) - Held , yes- Definition of workman as given in S.2 (s ) is wide enough to include even a part time employee- AIR 1960AP 371 dissented from . "
2. डिवीजनल मैनेजर , न्यू इंडिया एश्योरेन्स कम्पनी लि. बनाम ए. शंकरालिंगम ( 2009 ) 1 सुप्रीम कोर्ट कैसेज ( एल.एण्ड. एस ) 55 माननीय न्यायालय ने इस विधिक दृष्टांत में निम्न सिद्धांत प्रतिपादित किया है :-
प्रार्थी अंशकालीन मजदूर से अस्थायी मजदूर का दर्जा प्राप्त करने की पात्रता नहीं रखता । अप्रार्थी ने यह उल्लेख किया है कि दिनांक 2-7-1990 के प्रमाण- पत्र में मात्र इस बात को दर्शित किया था कि प्रार्थी ने 245 दिन उपस्थिति दी थी तथा इन दिवसों में प्रार्थी द्वारा अंशकालीन सफाई कर्मचारी के रूप में कुल 803 घण्टे ही कार्य किया गया था । इस तथ्य को अस्वीकार किया गया है कि प्रार्थी द्वारा तार वितरण का कार्य भी किया गया हो । यह भी उल्लेख किया गया है कि अप्रार्थी विभाग में कोई पद रिक्त होने मात्र से ही प्रार्थी रिक्त पद पर नियुक्ति का अधिकारी नहीं होता । प्रार्थी द्वारा कभी भी नियमित रूप से तार वितरण का कार्य नहीं किया गया । तार वितरण के कार्य पर कार्यरत कर्मचारी के अवकाश पर रहने के दौरान कभी कभार प्रार्थी से तार वितरण का कार्य भी करवाया जाता था । अप्रार्थी ने अपने पत्र दिनांक 13-2-1997 में केवल यह तथ्य वर्णित किया था कि प्रार्थी ने अंशकालीन मजदूर के रूप में सफाई का कार्य तीन घण्टे के लिए किया है । अप्रार्थी निगम ने यह उल्लेख किया है कि पत्र दिनांक 15-7-2002 में प्रार्थी के उपस्थिति दिवसों का वर्णन किया गया है , लेकिन इसका यह अभिप्राय नहीं है कि प्रार्थी ने उपस्थिति के दिवसों के दौरान आठ घण्टे कार्य किया हो । पत्र दिनांक 9-9-1993 से यह स्पष्ट है कि प्रार्थी ने अंशकालीन मज़दूर के रूप में प्रति घण्टे के हिसाब से तीन घण्टे की अवधि हेतु अप्रार्थी विभाग में कार्य किया था । इस तथ्य को अस्वीकार किया है कि प्रार्थी ने वर्ष भर में 1095 घण्टे से अधिक कार्य किया हो । अप्रार्थी विभाग के किसी भी पत्र में अंशकालीन कर्मचारी को पूर्णकालीन कर्मचारी बनाने हेतु अनुमोदन नहीं किया गया है । प्रार्थी के पत्रों का जवाब अप्रार्थी विभाग द्वारा प्रार्थी को दिया जाता था । यह भी तथ्य अस्वीकार किया गया है कि प्रार्थी से कनिष्ठ अंशकालीन कर्मचारियों को अप्रार्थी विभाग ने पूर्णकालीन कर्मचारी बना दिया हो । अप्रार्थी विभाग द्वारा केवल उन अंशकालीन कर्मचारियों को पूर्णकालीन कर्मचारी का दर्जा दिया जा सकता है जो नियमों के तहत पात्रता रखते हों । प्रार्थी ने अंशकालीन कर्मचारी के रूप में प्रतिदिन चार घण्टे से भी कम समय तक कार्य किया था और इस कारण प्रार्थी पूर्णकालीन मजदूर का दर्जा प्राप्त करने की पात्रता नहीं रखता है । इस प्रकरण में औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम की धारा 25 - एफ के प्रावधान लागू नहीं होते हैं । क्योंकि प्रार्थी द्वारा पूर्णतया अंशकालीन मजदूर के रूप में प्रतिदिन चार घण्टे से भी कम अवधि तक घण्टों के हिसाब से मजदूरी का कार्य किया गया है । प्रार्थी की सेवामुक्तिकिसी भी कदर छंटनी की परिभाषा में नहीं आती है । प्रार्थी ने पूर्णतया अंशकालीन आकस्मिक मजदूर के रूप में कार्य किया और ऐसे व्यक्तियों के संबंध में वरिष्ठता सूची बनाने तथा प्रकाशन करवाना कानूनन अनिवार्य नहीं है । अप्रार्थी विभाग ने औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम की धारा 25 जी तथा 25 - एच तथा नियम 77 के प्रावधानों का उल्लंघन नहीं किया है । प्रार्थी द्वारा संदर्भित प्रपत्र इस प्रकरण पर लागू नहीं होते हैं । उक्त आधारों पर अप्रार्थी ने प्रार्थी के मांग - पत्र को निरस्त करने की प्रार्थना की ।
" Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 - Ss2 ( s ) , 25 - B and 25 - F . Applicability " Workman " - " Continuous Service " . Applicability to part time workers Consequent availability of S.25 - F safeguards -Held , a bare perusal of the two definitions reveals that their applicability is not limited to only full -time employees but requirement is that the workman claiming continuous service must fulfil the specific 7. प्रार्थी ने अपने मांग पत्र में उल्लेख किये गये तथ्यों की पुष्टि में स्वंय का शपथ- पत्र प्रस्तुत किया । अप्रार्थी ने प्रार्थी से प्रतिपरीक्षा की । प्रलेखीय साक्ष्य में प्रार्थी ने प्रदर्श-1 केन्द्रीय प्रशासनिक 4824
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
conditions amongst others laid down in the two provisions so as to seek the shelter of S.25 - F -A workman employed on a part - time basis but under the control and supervision of an employer is a workman in terms of S.2( s) of the Act , and is entitled to claim the protection of S.25 - F - Preponderance of judicial opinion is that a workman working even on a part time basis would be entitled to benefit of S.25 - F of the Act . "
10. हमने उक्त विधिक दृष्टांतों का अध्ययन किया । उक्त विधिक दृष्टांतों में प्रतिपादित सिद्धांतों के परिप्रेक्ष्य में हमारी राय है कि एक अंशकालीन श्रमिक भी औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 की धारा 2 ( एस ) की परिभाषा के अंर्तगत कामगार की परिभाषा में आता है । अतः प्रार्थी भी उक्त धारा के अंर्तगत कामगार की परिभाषा में आता है । उक्त विधिक दृष्टांतों में प्रतिपादित सिद्धांतों के परिप्रेक्ष्य में हमारी यह भी राय है कि ऐसे कामगारों पर औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम की धारा 25 - एफ के प्रावधान लागू होते हैं तथा उन्हें भी इस धारा के अंतर्गत उल्लेख किये गये सुरक्षा उपाय उपलब्ध हैं । 11. प्रार्थी ने अपने प्रार्थना - पत्र में स्पष्ट रूप से यह उल्लेख किया है कि अप्रार्थी नियोजक ने उसे दिनांक 18-11-1989 को नियुक्त किया था तथा उसने लगातार 3-3-1997 तक अप्रार्थी नियोजक के यहां कार्य किया था । अप्रार्थी ने मांग पत्र के प्रतिउत्तर की चरण संख्या -2 में स्पष्ट रूप से यह उल्लेख किया है कि अप्रार्थी नियोजक ने प्रार्थी को दिनांक 18-11-1989 को अपने सुमेरपुर कार्यालय के अंशकालीन आकस्मिक श्रमिक के रूप में नियुक्त किया था । अपने प्रतिउत्तर की चरण संख्या -4 में स्पष्ट रूप से यह उल्लेख किया है कि अप्रार्थी के विभाग में कार्य की आवश्यकता नहीं होने से प्रार्थी को दिनांक 3-3-1997 को कार्य हेतु नहीं बुलाया गया । प्रार्थी ने अपने साक्ष्य में भी स्पष्ट रूप से यह उल्लेख किया है कि उसने दिनांक 18-11-1989 से दिनांक 3-3-1997 तक अप्रार्थी नियोजक के यहां कार्य किया था । अप्रार्थी की साक्ष्य में इस तथ्य का कोई खण्डन नहीं हुआ है । अप्रार्थी की ओर से एक दस्तावेज प्रदर्श एम -1 प्रस्तुत किया गया है । यह अप्रार्थी विभाग द्वारा जारी एक प्रमाण- पत्र है , इसमें प्रार्थी की नवम्बर 1989 से 21 जुलाई , 1990 तक की उपस्थिति को प्रमाणित किया गया है । प्रार्थी को 18 नवम्बर 1989 से ही नियुक्त किया गया था । इस पत्र को देखते हुए भी यही निष्कर्ष निकलता है कि प्रार्थी अपने कार्यालय से कभी भी अनुपस्थित नहीं रहा । अतः पत्रावली पर उपलब्ध साक्ष्य से यह तथ्य भी प्रमाणित होता है कि प्रार्थी ने अप्रार्थी नियोजक के यहां दिनांक 18-11-1989 से दिनांक 3-3-1997 तक लगातार कार्य किया ।
12. प्रार्थी की ओर से अप्रार्थी विभाग का एक पत्र प्रदर्श -7 भी प्रदर्श करवाया गया है । यह पत्र सन् 1994 में जारी हुआ है । इसके अनुसार प्रार्थी ने अप्रार्थी के कार्यालय में प्रतिदिन 3 घण्टे + 1 घण्टा कुल 4 घण्टे कार्य किया । अप्रार्थी के पत्र प्रदर्श-8 तथा पत्र प्रदर्श -9 से यह भी प्रमाणित होता है कि अप्रार्थी के कार्यालय में तार मैसेन्जर के दो पद रिक्त थे तथा तार मैसेन्जर के अवकाश के समय प्रार्थी तार वितरण का कार्य भी करता था । अतः समस्त परिस्थितियों पर
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] सावधानीपूर्वक विचार करने के पश्चात् यह तथ्य प्रमाणित होता है कि प्रार्थी ने अप्रार्थी के कार्यालय में उसकी सेवा समाप्ति की तिथि दिनांक 3-3-1997 तक उसकी नियुक्ति दिनांक 18-11-1989 से लगातार कार्य किया । अतः समस्त परिस्थितियों पर सावधानीपूर्वक विचार करने के पश्चात् हमारी राय में प्रार्थी की छंटनी औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम की धारा 25- एफ के प्रावधानों के अनुरूप ही की जा सकती थी । पत्रावली पर कोई साक्ष्य नहीं है जिसके आधार पर यह माना जा सके कि अप्रार्थी नियोजक ने प्रार्थी की दिनांक 3-3-1997 को सेवा समाप्ति औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम की धारा 25 - एफ के प्रावधानों के अनुसार की । अतः समस्त परिस्थितियों पर सावधानीपूर्वक विचार करने के पश्चात् हमारी राय में अप्रार्थी द्वारा प्रार्थी की दिनांक 3-3-1997 से की गई सेवा समाप्ति वैद्य तथा उचित प्रमाणित नहीं होती है ।
13. विद्वान प्रतिनिधि प्रार्थी का यह तर्क रहा है कि प्रार्थी का सेवा में चयन नियमित प्रक्रिया के अंतर्गत नहीं हुआ था । विद्वान प्रतिनिधि अप्रार्थी का यह मानना है कि यदि ऐसे व्यक्ति की सेवाएं नियमित की जाती हैं तो अन्य योग्य व्यक्तियों के अधिकारों का हनन होता है । विद्वान प्रतिनिधि अप्रार्थी का यह मानना है कि यदि प्रार्थी की सेवाएं नियमित की जाती हैं तो यह भारतीय संविधान के अनुच्छेद 14 तथा 16 का उल्लंघन होगा । विद्वान प्रतिनिधि अप्रार्थी का यह भी तर्क है कि प्रार्थी को केवल आकस्मिक तथा अस्थायी कार्य के लिए ही अंशकालीन श्रमिक के रूप में नियुक्त किया गया था तथा उसकी सेवाएं नियमित नहीं थीं । विद्वान प्रतिनिधि अप्रार्थी का यह मानना है कि प्रार्थी को केवल आकस्मिक तथा अस्थायी कार्य के लिए ही अंशकालीन श्रमिक के रूप में नियुक्त किया गया था । विद्वान प्रतिनिधि अप्रार्थी का यह तर्क है कि प्रार्थी ने अपनी सेवा समाप्ति के विरूद्ध सहायक रिजनल श्रम आयुक्त ( केंद्रीय ) को शिकायत अत्यन्त विलम्ब से दिनांक 11-11-2005 को की थी तथा इसके संबंध में रेफरेन्स भी अत्यंत विलम्ब से दिनांक 9-1-2007 को हुआ था । इन परिस्थितियों में विद्वान प्रतिनिधि अप्रार्थी का यह तर्क है कि अब 13 साल बाद प्रार्थी को सेवा में पुर्नस्थापित करने का आदेश दिया जाना उचित नहीं होगा । विद्वान प्रतिनिधि अप्रार्थी ने अपने इन तर्कों की पुष्टिमें निम्न विधिक दृष्टांत प्रस्तुत किये हैं-
1. विकास अधिकारी तथा अन्य बनाम लेबर कोर्ट बीकानेर तथा अन्य 2007 ( 1 ) डब्ल्यू.एल.सी. ( राजस्थान ) पेज 474 माननीय न्यायालय ने इस विधिक दृष्टांत में निम्न सिद्धांत प्रतिपादित किया है : -
" Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 S.25F - Award of reinstatement without back wages - Respondent engaged in Famine Relief Work and required to work one or two days in a week- Case of retrenchment of more than twenty years back- No evidence led by employer-Lump sum compensation of Rs . 50,000 awarded to respondent . "
"Relief of lump sum compensation in lieu of reinstatement may be awarded ( i ) when the nature of appointment of the workman is only casual and [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
temporary and such appointment was not made by following due process of law , ( ii ) when there had been delay in making of reference , ( iii ) when a long time has otherwise elapsed from the date of alleged retrenchment till passing of the award and subsequently till deciding the matter by the Court , (iv) when length of service of the workman has been much ( v) when the workman was engaged in a temporary project or scheme which has come to end , (vi) when the management does not have any post or means to accommodate and continue the workman in there services . Normal rule of reinstatement can be departed in favour of the payment of lump sum compensation is any appropriate case where the matter falls in any of these broad categories . " 2. म्युनिसिपल कोसिल सुजानपुर बनाम सुरिन्द्र कुमार ( 2006 ) 5 सुप्रीम कोर्ट केसेज पेज 173 माननीय न्यायालय ने इस विधिक दृष्टांत में निम्न सिद्धांत प्रतिपादित किया है : - "Labour Law-Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 - Ss.11- A, 25 - F and 25- B - Relief under S. 11 - A - Nature of, and preconditions for grant of reinstatement----Relief under S.11 - A , held, discretionary--Hence , should be granted not automatically but after considering the peculiar facts of each case including the nature and purpose of the appointment , the duration/ tenure of the work and the question whether the post was a sanctioned one- That it is lawful to grant reinstatement with back wages does not mean that the same should be granted automatically . In the present case , the appointment of the respondent workman was not in a sanctioned post and was made at the instance of a Minister dehors the rules and in violation of Arts . 14 and 16 while the employer Municipal Council was a " State " within the meaning of Art . 12 - Hence , the said appointment , held , void- Therefore , for termination of his service without complying with S.25 - F , held , the appropriate relief was grant of monetary compensation ( Rs.50,000 in this case ) and not reinstatement with back wages . " 3. सेक्रेटरी स्टेंट ऑफ कर्नाटका तथा अन्य बनाम उमादेवी (2006 ) 4 एस.सी.सी. पेज 1
14. हमने उक्त विधिक दृष्टांतों का अध्ययन किया तथा विद्वान प्रतिनिधि अप्रार्थी के उक्त तकों पर भी विचार किया । यह एक तथ्य है कि प्रार्थी की नियुक्ति Due process of law के अनुसार नहीं की गई थी । प्रार्थी को केवल अंशकालीन श्रमिक के रूप में नियुक्त किया गया था । प्रार्थी का कार्य नियमित प्रकृति का नहीं था । प्रार्थी ने अपनी सेवा समाप्ति दिनांक 3-3-1997 के संबंध में सहायक रिजनल श्रम आयुक्त ( केन्द्रीय ) को शिकायत अत्यंत विलम्ब से दिनांक 11-11-2005 को की थी । रेफरेन्स भी अत्यन्त विलम्ब से प्राप्त हुआ है । सेवा समाप्ति से आज तक करीब 13 वर्ष की अवधि व्यतीत हो चुकी है । अतः समस्त परिस्थितियों पर सावधानीपूर्वक विचार करने के पश्चात् हमारी राय में प्रार्थी को सेवा में पुर्नस्थापित करने के स्थान
4825
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
पर उसे समुचित क्षतिपूर्ति दिलाया जाना समीचीन है । समस्त परिस्थितियों पर सावधानीपूर्वक विचार करने के पश्चात् मारी राय में प्रार्थी को 1,50,000 रुपये क्षतिपूर्ति दिलाया जाना उचित प्रतीत होता है ।
आदेश
15. अतः यह अधिनिर्णित किया जाता है कि :-
( 1 ) अप्रार्थी जनरल मैनेजर टेलीकॉम , बी.एस.एन.एल. द्वारा प्रार्थी श्री दिनेश कुमार पुत्र श्री मांगीलाल को दिनांक 3-3-1997 को सेवा से पृथक करना अनुचित एवं अवैध है । (2 ) प्रार्थी को सेवा में पुर्नस्थापित करना अपेक्षित नहीं है । अतः प्रार्थी को सेवा में पुर्नस्थापित करने के बजाए एकमुश्त क्षतिपूर्ति की राशि 1,50,000 ( एक लाख पचास हजार रुपए ) अप्रार्थी नियोजक से प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी घोषित किया जाता है ।
(3) अप्रार्थी नियोजक इस आदेश की तिथि दिनांक 22-3-2010 से तीन माह की अवधि में उक्त क्षतिपूर्ति का भुगतान प्रार्थी को करे ।
16. इस अधिनिर्णय को प्रकाशनार्थ भारत सरकार के श्रम मंत्रालय को प्रेषित किया जावे । 17. यह अधिनिर्णय आज दिनांक 22-3-2010 को खुले न्यायालय में हस्ताक्षर कर सुनाया गया ।
एच. आर. नागौरी , न्यायाधीश नई दिल्ली , 13 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1958. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार दूर संचार विभाग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय नं II , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 99/2005 , 390/2005 , 100/2005 एवं 101/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-7-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -40012 / 172 से 175/ 2004- आई आर ( डीयू) ]
जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 13th July , 2010
S.O. 1958. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. Nos . 99/ 2005 , 390/2005 , 100/2005 and 101/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- Cum - Labour Court No. II , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Department of Telecom and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 13-7-2010 .
[No. L -40012 / 172 to 175 / 2004 - IR (DU) ] JOHN TOPNO , Under Secy .
4826
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT- IL, CHANDIGARH PRESENT : Shri A. K. Rastogi , Presiding Officer 1. Case No. I. D. 99/2K5
Shri Thakur Das S/ o Shri Nek Singh , R/ o Village & P.O. Thana , Tehsil Thunag, District Mandi (H.P. )
Versus
The Telecom Distt . Manager , Telecom , BSNL . , Place Colony, Distt . Mandi ( H.P. ) and another
2. Case No. I. D. 390/ 2K5
Shri Geeta Nand S/ o Shri Hardev Ram , R/ o Village & P.O. Gohar , District Mandi (H.P. )
Versus
The S.D.O. Telecom . BSNL Sunder Nagar , Distt . Mandi (H.P.) & another .
3. Case No. I. D. 100/2K5
Shri Chattar Singh S/ o Shri Manglu Ram , R/ o Village Sohil , P.O. Baggachanogi , Tehsil Thunag , Distt . Mandi ( H.P. ) Manglu R/ o Vill . & P.O. Shikawari Tehsil Thunag , Mandi (H.P.)
Versus
The Telecom Distt . Manager , Telecom , BSNL . , Place Colony, Distt . Mandi ( H.P. ) & another .
4. Case No. I. D. 101 /2K5
Shri Chura Mani S / o Shri Manglu , R/ o Village & P.O. Shikawari , Tehsil Thunag , Mandi (H.P. )
Versus
The Telecom Distt . Manager , Telecom , BSNL . , Place Colony, Distt . Mandi ( H.P.) & another .
APPEARANCES
For the Workman : Sh . D. R. Sharma , Advocate .
For the Management : Sh . Sanjeev Sharma , Advocate .
AWARD
Passed on 29th June , 2010
In all the above four references common questions of law and facts are involved , hence they are being adjudicated upon by this common award.
In ID No. 99 /2K5 the Central Government vide order No. L -40012 / 175 /2004 - IR( DU) ) Dated 4-5-2005 has referred the following dispute for adjudication: --
" Whether the action of the management of Distt . Manager Telecom , Mandi in terminating the services of Sh . Thakur Dass w.e.f. 23-8-96 without any notice and payment of retrenchment compensation is illegal and unjustified ? If so , ' to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date ? " In iD No. 390/ 2K5 the Central Government h referred the following dispute vide order No. L - 40012 /1
[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] 2004 - IR (DU) Dated 27-06-2005 has referred the following dispute for adjudication :-
"Whether the action of the management of District Manager Telecom , Mandi in terminating the services ofSh . Geeta Nand w.e.f. 24-8-96 without any notice and payment of retrenchment compensation is illegal and unjustified? If so , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date ? " In I.D. No. 100/ 2K5 the Central Government has referred the following dispute vide order No.L -40012/173/ 2004 - IR ( DU) Dated 4-5-2005 has referred the following dispute for adjudication :--
"Whether the action of the management of Distt . Manager Telecom , Mandi in terminating the services ofSh . Chattar Singh w.e.f. 24-8-96 without any notice and payment of retrenchment compensation is illegal and unjustified ? If so , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date ? " In I.D. No. 101 /2K5 the Central Government has referred the following dispute vide order No.1 . - 40012/174/ 2004 - IR ( DU ) Dated 4-5-2005 has referred the following dispute for adjudication :-
"Whether the action of the management of Distt . Manager Telecom , Mandi in terminating the services of Sh . Chura Mani w.e. f. 24-8-96 without any notice and payment of retrenchment compensation is illegal and unjustified ? If so , to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date ? " Asper claim statements the claimants / workmen were engaged as Daily wage mazdoors by the management in October/November 2005. Thakur Dass of I.D. No. 99/ 2K5 on 08-11-1995 Geeta Nand of I.D. No. 390 / 2K5 on 15-11-1995 , Chattar Singh of 1.D. No. 100 / 2K5 on 19-10-1995 and Chura Mani of ID No. 101 / 2K5 on 19-10-1995 were engaged . The services of Thakur Dass , the claimant in ID No. 99 / 2K5 on 23-08-99 and of other claimants on 24-08-1996 were terminated . The workmen challenged their termination before the Central Administrative Tribunal , Chandigarh Bench , Chandigarh in O.A. No. 83 1 / HP/ 1997 in which they were held entitled for the benefits of 1999 Policy vide order dated 18-10-2001 , but inspite of the order of the Hon'ble Tribunal , the management rejected the claim of the workmen on the ground that they were not entitled to the benefit of the scheme as they were not on the roll on 01-08-1908 . According to them the termination of their servicit violation of the provisions of industrial Disye no notice whatsoever or retrenchment benefit under Sector 25 was given to them . The management has made fresh appointments from January to March 1996 by ignoring the claims of the workmen . They have claimed reinstatement and other consequential benefits.
The claims were contested by the respondents . They have referred another matter of OA No. 1146 / HP / 96 titled [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
as Union of India & Others Vs Bhuri Singh & another decided by the Central Administrative Tribunal and has further stated that In CWP No. 1531 of 2002 , the Hon'ble High Court of H.P. has stayed the operation of the order of the aforesaid Tribunal and the matter is still pending before the Hon'ble High Court . According to the respondents , the claim is time barred . The workmen were engaged on day to day basis purely for casual nature of work . The managernent had requisitioned a list of eligible candidates fromthe Employment Exchange to fill up some sanctioned posts of daily rated mazdoors . The names of the claimants/ workmen Thakur Dass , Chura Mani and Geeta Nand were sponsored by the Employment Exchange but Thakur Dass and Chura Mani of ID No. 99 /2K5 and ID No. 101 /2K5 respectively did not qualify the screening test . The name ofChattar Singh of ID No. 100/ 2K5 had not been sponsored by the Employment Exchange . On availability of selected DRMs from the selection process services of the claimants / workmen were not required and hence , they were asked not to come further . Casual labour had no right to claim civil posts . Their claim is devoid ofmerits .
The claimants filed rejoinder also. It is denied that the claim is time barred . According to them the management intentionally has not shown the number of working days ofthe month ofJanuary 1996 and the off days of December , February , March and May 1996 in which the workmen had been paid the wages . If the off days are included , the workmen completed more than 240 days service . The claim for the benefit of the Scheme of 1999 had been rejected only on the ground that they were not in service on 1-8-1998 and not on the ground that they had not worked for240 days .
In each reference the concerned workman filed bis affidavit in evidence . While on behalf of the Management S.D.O. Telecom Raj Kumar filed his affidavit . Besides this the parties filed certain papers also , which will be referred to at relevant and proper place . The parties have filed their written arguments which are on record of ID No. 99 /2K5 . 1 have gone through the evidence of the parties and their written arguments . The dispute about the entitlement of the claimants to the 1999 Scheme is out of the purview of these references . Also the matter is pending before the Hon'ble High Court . In the references the following points arise for consideration :
(i) Whether the termination of the services of the workmen is in violation of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act ?
(ii) Whether the fresh appointments were made by the respondents ignoring the claim ofthe workmen in violation of Section 25H of the industrial Disputes Act?
( iii) To what relief the claimants are entitled?
2904 G1/2010-19
4827
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7, 2010 / श्रावण 16 , 1932
Point No. 1
To decide the issue whether the claimants are entitled to the benefit of Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act or not, it is necessary to see whether they worked for the Management continuously for one year before termination of their services ? In each reference the evidence has been led by the parties separately , hence , they are being taken up one by one .
1. I.D. 99 /2K5
The claimant oLthe case Thakur Dass in his affidavit has stated that he was entitied for the benefit of temporary status scheme and the Management had admitted before the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 832/HP / 1997 that he had completed more than 240 days service . He has relied on experience Certificate Ex. W-2 , wherein it has been certified that he worked from 08-11-1995 to 23-08- 1996 for more than 90 days . In a management paper Annexure R- 5 , the details of working days have been given and according to it during his employment , the claimant worked only for 228 days . In his affidavit the workman has stated that if the engagement of November and days of January are taken into consideration he would have completed 258 days .
As stated above , in the Management paper Annexure R - 5 of the written statement of the Management , the working days of the claimant has been shown to be 228 days . The statement contains the details of the working days month -wise and against the month of January 1996 it is written N/ A . The witness of the Management Raj Kumar , S.D.O. in his cross - examination has stated that the numbers ofworking days of January 1996 have not been shown for want of record and if the days of January 1996 are counted , the total number of working days shall come about 240 days.
2. I.D. No. 390 /2K5
In this reference the claimant Geeta Nand in his affidavit has stated that provisions of Act were not complied with despite the fact that he had completed more than 240 days and a certificate to that effect was issued by the management a copy whereof is W - 2 . He has also stated thatbefore the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 831 /HP / 1997 the management has admitted that the claimant had worked for more than 240 days . A copy of certificate annexed with the claim statement shows that the claimant worked for more than 90 days from 15-11-1995 to 23-08- 1996. In Annexure R- 5 filed along with written statement by the Management the working days of the workman / claimant are 215. Against the month of January 1996 N / A is written.
The management witness Raj Kumar during his cross - examination has stated that it is incorrect to say that the workman worked continuously from November 1995 to August 1996 and if the record for the month of January 1996 could be available , the workman could be shown to 4828
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
have worked more than 240 days . During the cross- examination of the witness the original copy of the certificate W-2was produced .
3. I.D. No. 100 / 2K5
In this reference the workman Chattar Singh stated that while disengaging him the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act were not complied despite the fact that he worked for more than 240 days and a certificate to that effect has been issued by the management . A copy of the certificate is W - 1 annexed with the claim statement . It is dated 11-07-1996 and it has been certified in it that the workman worked for more than 90 days from November 1995 till the issuance of certificate i.e. till 11-07-1996 . The claimant further deposed in his affidavit that in OA No. 830 / HP/ 1997 before the Central Administrative Tribunal , the management admitted that he had completed more than 240 days . In an Annexure R- 5 of the written statement working days of the claimant has been shown as 210 days . Against the month of January and February 1996 N/ A is written .
The management witness Raj Kumar during cross- examination stated that record of that period is not available and if the days of these months are considered , the number of working days shall go above 240 days .
The claimant in his affidavit has also stated that before Assistant Labour Commissioner also the management admitted that the workman/ claimant worked for more than 240 days . He has filed a copy of the letter of Assistant Labour Commissioner ( C ) , Chandigarh to the Secretary Government of India , Ministry of Labour . It is Ex . W- 5 and it is mentioned in this letter that it is admitted position that he (Chattar Singh ) has completed more than 240 days from the date of appointment till the date of oral termination in August 1996 .
4. I.D. No. 101 / 2K5
The claimant Chura Mani filed his affidavit to say that while disengaging him the provisions of industrial Disputes Act were no complied with despite the fact that he had worked for more than 240 days and a certificate to that effect is Annexure - 2 . W-2 is the original certificate issued by S.D.O. Telegraph and it certifies that the workman worked from 9-11-1995 to 23-08-1996 for more than 90 days . He also referred the admission of the management before the Central Administrative Tribunal in OA No. 830 / HP/ 1997 that he had completed more than 240 working days service . In R - l annexure of the affidavit of Raj Kumar S.D.O. the working days of the claimant has been shown as 227 days . Against the month of January 1996 N / A is written . Workman stated in his affidavit that if the days of October 1995 and January 1996 are included , he has completed 240 days . During cross- examination he however , admitted his engagement from November 1995 against his averment in the claim statement that he had been engaged or 19-10-1995 .
During cross - examination the mi 1. the Raj Kumar stated that numbers of w month of January 1996 are not shows for wey of coord and if the days of the month are counted , the lotu namber ofworking days shall be more than 240 days
Fisheries Terminal Division Versus Bhilaubha , seyrajicha Chavda 2010 ( 1 ) SCT 820 wherein regarde
The learned counsel for workmer pes elted tumector 240 days service it was held that blender is on workman to prove thar he completed 210 da, kul service . Butit shifts to employer when workman pas cepsed rom the witness box in support of bis claim.
The learned counsel for the workmen atse eчeб LD . Singh Versus Reserve Bank of India and owners . 85 ( 2 ) AISLJ 457 wherein no record of attendance was procuced by the Bank and it was in the affidavit of the pellamur that he worked 202 days in the year and if 52 S. holidays are added , it comes to 271 days 17 he was entitled to the benefit of Section 25. tic bener's case that he worked more than 240 days wasс гол Thakur Dass of ID No. 99 of 22 Quets NandAD No. Inthe present case it will be seen that are R- 1 of the affidavit of maragement witness in 10 No ! 2K5 , the claimant Chura Mani has been sower to have worked 227 days . While according to A kur 215 he and er written statements in other references the claimant Dass worked 228 days , claimant Geeta Nand days and claimant Chattar Singh 210 days days of January 1996 have nor been shown in Annexure on the grounds that the record in wat weinble It is strange that the record of previous and attent months to January 1996 is available was the and only the record of January 926 is that too of all the workmen . It app har t has not come up before the Tribuoni with cigar again important to note that the ciam of the we their affidavit that they worked for pronou inspite of that they were not give the tensions ofIndustrial Disputes Act and that if the worn January 1996 are considered then they have war ανό προτε than 240 days , the management did not cammeratc.c . in the affidavit ofhis witness Raj Kumar This funtsuse was not controverted that the paid days of t December 1995 , January , February, March 1990 has not been shown in the Annexures of the wo The workmen in their rejoinder to the weitten stats . the management have stated this fact.It will mason that it the 31 days of January 1996 ure , included days shown in the aforesaid Annexures ofthe imena ment, the claim of the workmen that they worked for 240 days becomes acceptable , I , therefore , hold that we workmen 390/2K5 , Chattar Singh of ID 100/2K5 sard Cua Mani ofID No. 101 /2K5 worked 24 days with the management .
Admittedly their services were terminate shout any notice and paying retrenchuneur compassion is 4829 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
provided under Section 25F of the industrial Disputes Act. Their termination is illegal omd unjustified . Point No.1 is decided in isvour of the workmen and against the management .
Point No. 2
reinstatement with full back wages and benefit of continuity of service was upheld by the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh . A copy of the certified copy of the judgment has been filed . The judgment , however , does not fully support the case of the workmen regarding the reinstatement and entitlements to the wages with continuity ofservice. The Hon'ble High Court in para 8 has observed that after order of reinstatement extent of back wages. depends upon facts and circumstances of each case. It cannot be said as a proposition of law that in no case a workman is not entitled to full back wages after reinstatement . Simultaneously it cannot also be said after reinstatement in every case , the workman is entitled to full backwages .
On the other hand the management has cited Secretary State of Karnataka & others Versus Uma Devi & others 2006 ( 2 ) SCT 462 wherein the Apex Court observed that the poverty , unemployment and lack of quality of bargaining power is not grounds to regularize and absorb adhoc , temporary and casual employees in regular service ... If such concessions are to prevail , they also come in employment in violation to the fundamental right of others to equal opportunity to compete and will lead to depriving a large number of other aspirants of an opportunity .......... Adhoc , temporary and daily wage employees cannot claim regularization . However , they should be given preference on the basis of their experience at the time the same posts are filled on regular basis by open selection and condition of age bar should be waived off for them .
it is thus clear that the reinstatement , continuity of service and back wages cannot be claimed as a matter of right . Considering the fact that the services of the workmen were only of few months and they being Daily Rated Mazdoors would not have remained unemployed after the termination, I am of the view that in lieu of reinstatement and back wages a compensation of Rs . 25,000/- each will be sufficient and proper .
According to the workmen the management has made fresh appointments from January to March 1996 by ignoring their claims . The management in their written statement has stated that it had requisitioned a list of eligible candidates from the Employment Exchange to full up some sanctioned posts of Daily Rated Mazdoors and on availability of selected D.R.Ms from the selection process ; services of the claimants / workmen were dispensed with . The managernent's witness Raj Kumar in the last paragraph of his affidavit has stated that the names ofthe workmen were not sponsored by the management . Though in the written statement the version of the management was that the name of Thakur Dass , Chura Mani and Geeta Nand had been sponsored by the Employment Exchange but Thakur Dass and Chara Mani did not qualify the screening test . The witness of fhe management was , however , not confronted with the said discrepancy. It is not the case of the workmen that the vacancies of Daily Rated Mazdoors were not filled through the Employment Exchange and the averment of the management in this regard is false. If the vacancies are filled up following the selection process the workman cannot claim the benefit of Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act . It is also important to note that the Telecom Department has imposed a ban on recruitment/ engagement of casual labourers vide letter No. 269-4/93 -STN - II dated 12-02-99 . The Office Memo . Dated 12-02-1996 , Annexure R - 6 of the written statement on the record of ID No. 99 of 2KS has a mention of it . A copy of Office Momo is available on the record of other references also According to it the powers of D.O.T. Officers to engage casual labourers either on daily or monthly wages direct or through contractors as well as the authority of the Accounts Officers for making payment to the labourers engaged on daily/monthly basis either direct or through contractors were withdrawn from immediate effect . I am , therefore , of the view that the provisions of Section 25 H of the Industrial Disputes Act cannot be made applicable in the cases of workmen . Issue No.2 is decided against the workmen .
Point No. 3
In ID No. 99 /2K5 Thakur Dass Vs Telecom District Manager & another , in Case ID No. 390 / 2K5 Geeta Nand VsTelecom District Manager & another , ID No. 100 / 2K5 Chattar Singh Vs Telecom District Manager & another and in ID No. 101 / 2K5 Chura Mani Vs Telecom District Mianager & another the termination of the services of the respective workmen without notice and payment of retrenchment compensation is held illegal , unjustified and each of the workmen is entitled to get Rs . 25,000/ -from the respondents in lieu of the reinstatement and back wages . The references are , answered accordingly. Let a copy of the award be sent to the Central Government for further necessary action and record be consigned after due compliance .
After hoiding that the termination , of the workmen was against the provisions of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act , the question arises as to what reliefs are the workmen entitled to ? The counsel for the workmen argued that in the case of Director Fisheries Terminal Division (supra ) the Hon'ble Apex Court reinstated the workman with 20 per cent back wages and in the Telecom District Manager Telecommunication District Hamirpur Versus Shashi Kumar and another the award of the Tribunal for
ASHOK KUMAR RASTOGI , Presiding Officer 4850
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16, 1932
नई दिल्ली, 19 जुलाई , 2010
वा. आ. 1959.--औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के सबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निदिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , एरनाकुलम के पंत्चाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 2/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-7-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [सं. एल -12011/107/2007- आई आर( बी- II ) ] अनिल कुमार शर्मा , अनुभाग अधिकारी New Delhi , the 19th July, 2010
S. O. 1959.in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 2/2008 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal Labour Court , Ernakulam now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employees in relation to the management of Canara Bank and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 13-7-2010.
No. L - 12011.107 /2007 - IR( B - II ) ] ANIL KUMAR SHARMA , Section Officer
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT , ERNAKULAM Shri P.L. Norbert . B.A. LL.B. , Presiding Officer e Ist day of July , 2010 / 10th Ashadam , 1932 )
1. D. 2/2008
The Secretary, Canara Bank Workers ' Organisation , C / o . Canara Bank , Cantonment , Trivandrum- 695039 .
By Adv . Smt . IH . Subhalekshmi .
Management : The General Manager , Canara Bank , Circic Office , Mahatma Gandhi Road . Trivandrum- 695039 .
By Adv . Sri P. Gopinath Menon.
Ihis case coming up for hearing on 28-6-2010 , this 1 ribunal - cum - Labour Court on 1-7-2010 passed the following:
AWARD
This is a reference made under Section 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) of Industrial Disputes Act. The reference is :
"Whether the transfer of Smt . Syamala Kumari , Clerk working in Ernakulam South Branch of the Canara Bank falling in Trivandrum . Circle to Calicut Circle vide orders dated 11th June, 2007 by the ..... nagement of Canara . Bank is a routine transfer as pe Bank's Transfer Policy or to accommodat , back in Trivandrum Circle , Senior employees deployed to
[PART 11 -SFC . 3 ( ii ) ] Calicut Circle during 2006 and 2007 ? " If it is for later purpose , how the employee can be compensated for her wrongful transfer ?" .
2. The facts of the case in brief are as follows: Smt. T. Syamala Kumari while working as Clert im Ernakulam South Branch of Canara Bank was transferred to Manjeri ofMalappuram District . of Calicut circle on 11-06-2007 . She made a representation to the management against the transfer . But that was not considered favourably by the bank . The worker has not joined duty in Manjeri so far .
3. According to the union which has espoused the cause of the worker the transfer is in violation of the provisions of settlement between management and the union as well as transfer norms of the management . She along with a few others were . transferred to Calicut Circle in June 2007 for the purpose of retransferring some of the remembers of majority union from Calicut to Trivandrum Circle . Hence the union alleges mala fides the transfer . It isalso alleged that there is discrimination in choosing ladies alone for transfer to Calicut Circle . It is contented that the family problems of the worker prevents her from staying away from home .
4. The management contends that at the time of reorganisation of circles in August 2006 when Calicut circle was formed a few staff were required in Calicut Circle and thus transfers were effected. The management has ordered transfer of employees strictly in accordance with the transfer policy of the bank and as per the settlement between management and majority union . The worker was employed in and around Ernakulam for the last 27 years . She was working for about 5 yearsars in the bank at South Branch when she was transferred to Calicut circle . The management has acted fairly and justly in the matter of transfer of the worker . The worker had raised the dispute before Assistant Labour Commissioner and had also filed WritO.P. before High court . The Writ Petition was dismissed , against which she filed a Writ Appeal . It also ended in dismissal . Since the issue raised in the reference is already considered and answered by the High Court the present proceeding is barred by principles of constructive res judicata . It is due to administrative exigency that transfers were effected in 2007. The worker is not entitled to any relief.
5. In the light of the above contentions the following points arise for consideration :
1. Is the transfer illegal ?
2. Is the transfer actuated by mala fides ?
3. Reliefs , if any ?
6. The evidence consists of the oral testinory of WW1 & 2 and documentary evidence of Exts . WI to 4 on the side of the union and MWI and Ext.Ml on the side of the management and Court Exts . XI to X6 ( summoned from the management at the request of unlon after the evidence wasclosed) .
4831 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7, 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
7. Point Nos.1 & 2 : The first allegation of the union is that the transfer is actuated by mala fides . In November 2006 some of the employees were transferred to Calicut . Most of them were members of majority union ( CBEU ) . The union prevailed upon the management and got them retransferred . In substitution the worker and a few others were transferred from Trivandrum circle to Calicut circle in June 2007. It is submitted that Ext. W4 circular of union would support this contention . Ext . W4 shows that the union had promised to get its members retransferred from Calicut circle within a period of 2 years . The 2nd contention of the union is that the transfer is in violation of Settlement dated 02-06-2005 . As per Clause ( ii ) of schedule - VI of the settlement an employee can be deployed outside the district only within a distance of 100 kms . from his present place of posting . The worker was in Ernakulam South branch at the time of transfer . The distance from Ernakulam to Manjeri exceeds 100 kms . and hence it is in violation of the settlement . It is also alleged that she was about to complete 50 years when the transfer was effected. As per transfer policy , Ext . M ! an employee who is 50 years of age is not be disturbed from her present place . It was lastly contended by the union that the worker had lot of family problems in living away from her home . She belongs to Thripunithura. Her husband who is employed is an acute diabetic patient . Her parents are aged and she is the only child of her parents . She had even given up promotion to avoid transfer .
8. Ext.X - 1 is a list of 15 employees transferred to Calicut circle from Trivandrum circle in November 2006 . Out of them the transfer order of nine persons was withdrawn by the management as per Ext. X - 2 list of November 2006. Hence in effect only six employees out of Ext . X - l list were retained in Calicut circle . Again in January 2007 as per Ext.X 3 list 14 staff were transferred from Trivandrum circle to Calicut circle . Thus altogether 20 staff were transferred from Trivandrum circle to Calicut circle by January 2007. Ext . X4 is 2007 general transfer list of staff. In June 2007 as per Ext . X5 list 19 staff were transferred from Calicut circle to Trivandrum circle . On a perusal of Exts . X- 1 to X - 3 lists it is seen that the persons who were transferred as per Ext.X - 5 list to Trivandrum circle include 6 persons retained in . Calicut circle out of Ext . X - 1 list and 13 persons out of 14 as per Ext.X - 3 list . Thus ali the employees transferred to Calicut circle in November 2006 as per Ext . X - 1 list were retransferred to Trivandrum circle in June 2007. Ext . X -6 which is same as Ext . W - 1 is a list of 19 employees transferred to Calicut circle in June 2007 including the worker .
9. However it is to be noted that the worker as well as some of other employees who were aggrieved by the transfer had approached the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala inWrit Petition 24661/2007 and 8 other O.Ps. Subsequently worker also filed O.P. 25882/2007 which was considered separately and nine writ O.Ps. were considered together and a common judgment was passed on 21-08-2007 . All the contentions raised before this court were raised in O.Ps.
10. Regarding violation of the provisions of Bipartite settlement it was held by the Hon'ble High Court that what ismentioned in Clause ( ii ) of Schedule VI of settlement dated 02-06-2005 is deployment of staff outside the district and not transfer of staff. It is observed that both deployment and transfer are different and it is more clear from Clause (xiii ) of the schedule VI which says that provisions on deployment are without prejudice to the provisions of paras 535 and 536 of Sasthry Award relating to transfer of workmen. Hence it is found that transfer effected from one district to another exceeding a distance of100 kms, is not in violation of the provisions of settlement . High Court also found that there is no discrimination in selecting a few including the worker based on transfer norms. They are employees who had completed five years ' service in respective places and were below the age of 50 years . It was observed that personal problems of aggrieved employees could be taken up before General Manager of the bank . The Writ Petitions were thus dismissed . On 23-08-2007 the Writ Petition filed by the worker was taken up and disposed off observing that the issues raised by the worker were substantially covered against her in the common judgment dated 21-08-2007 in nine Writ O.Ps. referred supra . In view of the further allegation of the workman that the transfer was to accommodate members of majority union it was observed by the Hon'ble High Court that since dispute was raised before conciliation officer this issue could be raised before adjudicatory authority and thus the Writ Petition was dismissed . The worker was not satisfied with the observation in O.P. She filed writ Appeal as WA 2297/2007 specifically taking up the plea of mala fides in the transfer . She submitted in appeal that it was for retransferring the members of majority union that worker and a few others were transferred to Calicut. In the light of the counter affidavit of the bank it was found in appeal that the transfer was effected on account of administrative exigencies since a new circle was formed in Calicut in the year 2006. It was also observed that the worker was in service in and around Ernakulam for the last 27 years and all the employees except the worker had joined the places to which they were transferred . If the worker has got any further grievance her remedy is to approach higher authorities of the bank . The appeal was therefore dismissed. Thus both in OP as well as in appeal all the contentions of the worker including the allegation of mala fides in the transfer were considered and answered by the Hon'ble High Court . The same issue cannot once again be reopened and raised before this court . The contention of the learned counsel for the union that the observation in the judgment in O. P. that the issue with regard to mala fides in transfer could be raised before adjudicatory authority is still available to the worker , is without merits . Had the union or the worker was satisfied with that observation of the High Court in O.P. no appeal would have been filed . In the appeal the specific contention was that the transfer was tainted with mala fides . This contention did not find favour with the division bench in WritAppeal . Thus all the contentions raised by the union THE GAZETTE OF INDIADAUGUST 7, 2010 / SHRAVANA 16, 1932
were adored and decided on merits by the Hon'ble High Сошт в О.P. as well as in writ appeal . Therefore none of these aspects can be re - opened and determined by this cour
i. Point No.3 :-(See Award portion) .
in the result an award is passed finding that the transfer of Sent . 7. Syamala Kumari from Ernakulam South Branch of Canara Bank of Trivandrum Circle to Calicut Circle as per order dated 11-06-2007 of the management is a routine transfer as per Banks Transfer Policy and it is legal and justified and is not actuated by maja fides Hence the worker is not entitled for any relief .
The award will come into force one month after its publication in the official gazette .
Dicrated to the Personal Assistant , transcribed and typed by her , corrected and passed by me on this the Ist day of July, 2010.
P.L NORBERT, Presiding Officer Appendix
Witnesses for the Union
WW
Ganesh H. , Union secretary
Syamala Kumari T. , Worker.
Witness for the Management
MWI
A. P. Janardhanan , Sr. Manager .
Exhibits for the Union
W!
List of employees to be referred to Calicut circle . dt: 11-6-2007 ,
W
Representation of workman to manage- ment dt : 14-6-2007
W3
Reply ofmanagement dr . 30-07-2007 .
W4
Circular of Canara Bank Employees ' Uniondt . 13-6-2007 .
Exhibit Ar the management
M1 Minutes of Joint Conference of management and Canara Bank Employees ' Union hela on 11-6-1980 .
Court Exhibits
XJ List of employees transferred to Circle Office, Calicut during November , 2006 .
X
List of employees whose transfers were withdrawn.
X
Listof employees transferred to Calicut Circle during January , 2007.
X4
List of employees included in 2007 General Transfer .
XS
List of employees transferred from Calicut Circle to Trivandrum Circle during June , 2007.
XE
List of employees transferred to Calicut Circleduring June , 2007 .
P.L. NORBERT , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 14 जुलाई , 201
का. आ. 1960. औद्योगिक विवाद भनिया 34711947 बैंक कार के का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में कंन्द्रीय सरकारद्रोनिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ सख्श 24/2007) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो कंन्द्रीय सरकार को 13-7-3310 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल -12011/ 143/2006 - आई अनिल कुमार शर्मा , अनुभाग अधिकारी New Delhi , the 14th July , 2010
S. O. 1960.In pursuance of Section 7 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Contrat Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref . No. 28.3407 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court . Jaipur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Disoute between the employees in relation to managemension Bank of India and their workmen , which was a rad by the Central Government on 13-7-2010 .
[ No. L - 12011143/2006- / 8-1 ANIL KUMAR SHARMA , Seconom ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIA TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT JAPUR PRESENT : N. K. PUROHIT. Presiding Officer 1. D. 28/37
Reference No. L - 12011 / 143 /2006 - IR ( B -11 ) dated The General Secretary Union Bank Employees Union 49, Raghu Vihar , Maharani i'arm , Durgapura
V/ s The Regional Head Union Bank of India
Regional Office , B - 100 , University Marg Bapu Nagar, Jaipur AWARD 29-06-2010
1. The Central Government in exercis powers conferred under clause ( d ) of Sub Section a ofSection 10 of the Industrial Dispures Act 1947 at the following Industrial Dispute to this tribunel for adjudication which is as under.
"Whether the action of the management of th Bank of India through Chief Manager , Isipur awarding the punishment for reduction ree stages in the pay scale and reduction by one stage in the pay scale and warning to Shri Dinesh Chandra Rawat , Peonvide order No. ROJ : STT: 2-171 /9498-03 dated [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
28-10-2003 is just and fair ? If not , what relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ?
2. Pursuant to the receipt of the reference , the registered notices were issued to both the parties . On perusal of the record , it appears that the applicant union has spoused the case of the workman Dinesh Chandra Rawat , but despite service of registered notice none has appeared on behalf of the applicant union .
3. An application was moved on behalf of non- applicant bank on 7-6-2010 , wherein it has been mentioned that the said union on having the matter settled amicably with the bank has written a letter to this tribunal endorsing the copy of the same to the bank . Since the union is not pressing the dispute anymore , the award may be passed accordingly . In this regard the copy of the letter written by General Secretary , Union Bank Employees Union (Raj .) dated 21-4-2010 addressed to this tribunal has also been submitted . Subsequently , on 14-6-2010 an another application was submitted on behalf of the non - applicant stating therein that workman Dinesh Chandra has been pronoted w.e.f. 7-6-2007 . Therefore , there remained no dispute between the parties .
4. Heard the learned representative on behalf of the non applicant bank and perused the record .
5. Upon perusal of the copy of letter dated 21-4-2010 written by General Secretary , Union Bank Employees Union , it appears that the above letter was written in reference to this Tribunal notice dated 5-4-2010 wherein the Union has submitted as under:
" It is brought to the kind notice of Hon'ble Court that the matter was amicable settled . The present Regional Head of the Bank ( Narmely Mr. Ashok Jain ) is a man of reasonable approach and kind enough to workmen Staff in redressing their genuine grievances with mutual discussions or at this own level ( if the grievance is brought in his knowledge even by the workman himself. In such circumstances , the workman has no grievances and Union is withdrawing this particular dispute .
Your good- self is therefore , requested to allow this matter to rest for ever by closing it . "
6. It is evident from the above letter written by the applicant union that no dispute remained between the parties and grievances of the workman stand redressed and there is no grievance left with the workman Shri Dinesh Chandra . Moreover , the applicant union has not filed any claim . It appears that applicant union is not willing to contest the case . Thus , under these circumstances there is no material on record before the Tribunal to adjudicate the reference on its merit . Resultantly no relief is required to be given to workman concerned and no claim award is passed in this matter . The reference under adjudication is answered accordingly.
7. Award as above .
N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer
4833
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
नई दिल्ली , 16 जुलाई , 2010
का. आ. 1961. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार राज कुमारी अमृत कौर कॉलेज ऑफ नर्सिंग के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नं 1 नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 1/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-7-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[ सं. एल -42011/81/2006 - आई आर( डीयू) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 16th July , 2010
S. O. 1961. -In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 1/2007 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cuin - Labour Court , No. 1 New Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to management of Raj Kumari Amrit Kaur College of Nursing and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 16-7-2010 .
[No. L - 42011 / 81 /2006 - IR (DU ) ]
JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy .
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 1 , KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX, DELHI
I. D. 1/2007
Shri Ram Chander S / o Shri Khem Chand , R / o Qtr . No. 1/10 , Raj Kumari Amrit Kaur College ofNursing , Andrews Ganj , New Delhi
..Claimant
Versus
The Principal ,
Raj Kumari Amrit Kaur College ofNursing , Andrews Ganj , New Delhi
.Management
AWARD
Raj Kumari Amrit Kaur College of Nursing (hereinafter referred to as the College ) imparts training to students of Masters of Nursing and Diploma of Nursing and Administration . Students from abroad and various parts of the country get nursing education in the College . They live in a hostel . The College authorities made an arrangement for a washerman to get clothes of the students washed . Washing charges are collected by the College and paid to the washerman , so engaged Shri Ram Chander was engaged by the College , vide letter dated 11-8-1988 for washing of clothes of students of nursing faculty , besides students in Administration . His services were disengaged 4834
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
by the Collegefrom 15th of July, 2004 , without assigning any reason . He was again given work by the College but w.e.f. 12-12-2004 his services were again disengaged , since it were no more required . He raised a disputes before the Conciliation Officer . When conciliation proceedings failed, the Government of N.C.T. of Delhi referred that dispute for adjudication to a Labour Court . The Labour Court came to a conclusion that Government of N.C.T. of Delhi was not the appropriate Government to make a reference ofdispute to it . When Labour Court declined to adjudicate the disputes for want ofjurisdiction, the claimant filed a claim before the Conciliation Officer ( Central) . Since conciliation proceedings failed, the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , vide Order No.1-42011 / 81/ 2006 - IR ( DU ) , New Delhi , dated 9-1-2007, with following terms :
"Whether the action ofthe Principal , Raj Kumari Amrit Kaur College of Nursing , New Delhi in terminating the services of their workman Shri Ram Chander S / o Shri Khem Chand, w.e.f. 12-12-04 is legal and justified ? If not , to what reliefthe workmann is entitled to ?"
2. Claim statement was filed by the claimant pleading there in that the College is an Industry within the meaning i clause (j ) of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( in short the Act ) . He was appointed as a Dhobi by the College , vide appointment letter dated 11-8-1988 . Не was working with the College since then with sincerity and diligently . The College has no complaint of whatsoever nature against him . His services were terminated by the College on 15th of July , 2004 without any reason and complying the mandatory provisions of the Act. After termination ofhis services , he made a complaint before the Assistant iLabour Commissioner , who issued notice to the College and the latter a started giving work to the workman . His servi were again terminated by the College we f. 12--2004 . He was getting salary @ ervices were terminated without any payment of retrenchment compensation . No weet was served upon him , not to talk of conducting domestic enquiry . He was not given facilities like overtime, leave sacashment , bonus , payment for work on holidays and other legal benefits . When he demanded these thefir itis services were terminated . Facilities like prwident fund and E.S.I. coverage were also not provided tohim. Work of Dhobi still exist with the College and after termination of his services some other person has been engaged . A legal notice was served upon the College on 2-8-2005 . Despite service of the notice neither the College reinstated him nor any reply was sent . He claims reinstatement in services with continuity and full back wages.
3. Claim was demurred by the College pleading that there was no relationship of employer and employee between the parties . Claimant has no cause of action against the College since he was never been engaged as
[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] an employee , for no post of Dhobi exists with the College , He was not paid out of the contingency fund , nor he was appointed against the post of Dhobi . By virtue or his position and status , the claimant did not answer the description of the " workman " as defined in clause ( s ) of Sec . 2 of the Act . It has been further pleaded that claim is barred by res -judicata , since the claimant approached the Central Administrative Tribunal with similar prayer , which application resulted in dismissal . It has further been projected that the College , being an educational institution imparts trainingto Nurses , hence it is not an industry within the meaning of clause (j ) of Section 2 of the Act . It has been projected that the claimant was just washing private (personal) clothes of some students , who came from all the states and foreign nations . Principal of the college , with a view to help the students , engaged local washerman for washing their clothes on monthly contribution by the students. Arrangement for getting clothes of 60-65 students washed was made and in pursuance of that arrangement the claimant was engaged . This was a voluntary arrangement of the College . It has been denied that the claimant was paid Rs.2200 PM . as his wages . His engagement does not amount to appointment on the post of Dhobi . Since he was never appointed by the college , there was no question of terminating his services . There is no merit in his claim and it may be dismissed .
4. Claimant had examined himself in suppot of his claim . Shri Harish Maheshwari , Administrative Officer was examined on behalf of the College , No other Witness was examined by either of the parties ,
5. Arguments wele heard at the bar , Shri Rajesh Kumar , authorised representative , advaneed arguments on behalf of the claimant . Shri Atul Bhardwaj , authorised representative , advanced arguments on behalf of the College I have given my careful consideration to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record. My findings on issues involved in the controversy are as follows :
6. First and foremost contention advanced by the College is that it is not an industry within the meaning of clause (j ) of Section 2 of the Act . It has been acerted that the Coilege imparts training to students of Master of Nursing and Diploma of Nursing education , besides students of Administration faculty . The claimant disputes that the College is not an industry , as defined by the Act . To appreciate submissions of rival parties , it is expedient to have a glance on definition of word " industry " , provided in clause (j ) of Section 2 of the Act , which definition is extracted thus :
" Industry" means any business , trade , undertaking . manufacture or calling of employers and includes any calling , service , employment , handicraft , or industrial occupation or avocation of workmen " 7. The definition of " industry " is both exhaustive and inclusive . It is in two parts . The first part says that it [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
"means any business , trade , undertaking, manufacture or calling ofemployers " and then goes to say that it " includes any calling , service , employment , handicraft or industrial occupation or avocation of workman. " Thus one part defined it from the stand point of the employer , and the other part from the stand point of the employees . The first part of the definition gives the statutory meaning of the industry, whereas the second part deliberately refers to several other items of industry and bring them in the definition in an inclusive way. The first part of the definition determines any industry by reference to occupation of employers in respect of certain activities viz. , business , trade , undertaking , manufacture or calling . The second part views the matter from the angle of employees and is designed to include something more in what the term primarily denotes . By this part of the definition any calling , employment , handicraft , industrial occupation or avocation of workmen is included in the concept of industry . This part gives extended connotation,
8. Gloss was puton the definition of word " industry " by the High Courts and the Apex Court time and again . The question as to what is " industry " has continuously baffled and perplexed the courts . A graph of the cases decided by the Apex Court , if plotted on the background of the expression used in two parts of the definition of "Industry " , would represent rather a zig zag curve. There have been various judicial ventures in this rather volatile area of law . The decided cases show that the efforts were made to evolve test by reference to characteristics regarded as essential for constituting an activity as an " Industry ". Various cases would show that the Apex Court has been guided more by empirical rather than a strictly analytical approach. Most of the decision have centered around the expression " undertaking " used in the definition . In Bangalore . Water Supply and Sewerage Board ( 1978 Lab . I.C. 778 ) the Apex Court reviewed the earlier decisions on interpretation of the wide words encompassed in the definition and formulated positive and negative principles for identifying " industry " as enacted by clause (i ) of Section 2 of the Act.It would be expedient to reproduce the authoritative pronouncement of the Court, in the very words set out in the majority decision , handed down by justice Krishna lyer , which are extracted thus:
1. " Industry " as defined in S.2 (j ) and explained in Banerji ( AIR 1953 S.C.58 ) has a wide irnport.
( a) Where ( i ) systematic activity, ( ii ) organized by Co - operation betweer employer and employee (thedirect and substantial element is chimerical ) ( iii) for the production and /or distribution of goods and services calculated to satisfy human wants and wishes ( not spiritual or religious but inclusive , of material things or services geared to celestial bliss i.e. making , on a large scale prasad 2904GI/2010-20
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7, 2010/श्रावण 16 , 1932
or foods) prima facie, there is an " industry " in thatenterprise .
(b) Absence of profit motive or gainful objective is irrelevant , be the venture in the public, joint, private or other sector.
(c) The true focus is functional and the decisive test is the nature of the activity with special emphasis on the employer - employee relations .
(d) If the organization is a trade or business it does not cease to be one because of philanthropy animating the undertaking.
II . Although Section 2 (j ) uses words of the widest amplitude in its two limbs , the remeaning cannot be magnified to overreach itself.
(a) " Undertaking " must suffer a contextual and associational shrinkage as explained in Banerjee and in this judgement , so also , service, calling and the like. This yields the inference that all organized activity possessing the triple elements in 1 (supra) , although not trade or business , may still be ' industry ' provided the nature of activity , viz . the employer -employee basis , bears resemblance to what we find in trade or business . This takes into the fold ' industry ' undertaking, calling and services , adventures , " analogous to the carrying on the trade or business " . All features , other than the methodology ofcarrying on the activity viz in organizing the co - operation between employer and employee , may be dissimilar . It does matter, if on the employment terms there is analogy.
III . Application of these guidelines should not short oftheir logical reach by invocation of creeds , cults or inner sense of incongruity or outer sense of motivation for or resultant of the economic operations . The ideology of the Act being industrial peace, regulation and resolution of industrial disputes between employer and workmen, the range of their statutory ideology must inform the reach of the statutory definition. Nothing less, nothing more .
(a) The consequences are (1 ) profession. (ii ) clans (iii) education institutions , cooperatives (v) research institutes , (vi ) charitable projects and (vii) other kindered adventures , if the full the triple tests listed in 1 ( supra) , cannot be capted from the scope of Section 2 (j ) ,
(b) A restricted category of professions , clubs , co - operatives and even gurukulas and litle research labs may qualify for exemption ' if in simple ventures, substantially, and going by the dominant nature criterion , substantively no employees are entertained but in menial matters , marginai employees are hired without destroying the non- employee character of the unit .
4836
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA AUGUST 7 , 2010SHP WALLE
As an educationa , instit
students are prese
other arm
that in
not f
therefore, the acess
of washerm
ambit mauar
10. The quest
educatonal instit
an "ir de
pocation o
Corporatio
affinnative me ...
was as ف when
( c) if , in a pious or altruistic mission many employ themselves , free or for small honoraria or like return . mainly drawn by sharing in the purpose or cause , such as lawyers volunteering to run a fier legal services clinic or doctors serving in the spare hours in a free medical centre or ashramites working atthe bidding of the holiness , divinity like sanuzi personality , and the services are supplied free or at nominal cost and those who serve are not engaged for remuneration or on the basis of master and servant relationship , then , the institution is not industry even if stray servants , manual or technical are hired . Such eleemosynary or like andertakings alone are exempt not other generosity , compassion . developmental passion or project
private person
Apex Court
IV . The dominant nature test:
"industry"
workinen , ( d
assimilated to
' calling or se
section 2 of the DATO
Sewerage Board
held that the
employees enmties son
true test is the prade
case of the Univerin
nature of the au
being a service to me ( a ) Where a complex of activities , some of which qualify for exemption , other not , involves employces on the total undertaking , some of whom are not "workmen " as in the University of Delid case ( AIR 1963 S.C.1873 ) or some departments are not productive of goods and services if isolated . even then , the predominant nature of the services and the integrated nature of the departments as explained in the Corporation of Nagpur ( AIR 1960 8.0.657 ) willbe the true test . The whole undertaking wilt be industry although those who are not " workmen " by definition may not benefit by the status .
there may be any nunh
institution , such as a pri
and clerical and meei
from the teach
operations viewers.p (b ) Notwithstanding the previous cults , sovereign functions , strictly understood ( ulone qualify for exemption , not the welfare activitie... et comic ady entures undertaking by govt or share Bodies .
:
may be treated
Apex Court ob
wrongly decide
and
( c ) Even in department discharging functions , if there are units which they are substantially severable , then thes considered to come within S.2 (1 ) . greiga
the Apex
not be truis
within the s
( d ) Constitutional and competen . arted legislative provisions ; may remove then the scope of the Al categories which otherwisemnyoseoul thereby.
undertaking of ba munt , q V We overrule Safdarjung ( AIR 1970 S
concept of indust
The court reit
regarded as andJa
would fall within the ar
section 2 of the ves
Court relied precedent .
sauraj Solicitors' case ( AIR 1962 S.C. 1080 ) , Gymkha S.C. 554 ) . Delhi University ( AIR 1963 S.C.187 Cinji Honal ( AIR 1975 SC 2032 ) and others whose retio ru's counter to the principles enunciated there and the Hospitol Mazdoor Sabha ( AIR 1960 Stereos rehabilitat.d. "
in would be sufficio . the
analogous to the win
involves compr
employees . This Beach Ma
meaning of the rap
adventures not strictly
similar . Reference.com als
Club Employ.c
Principles laid down in Bangalore Watappl Sewerage Board ( supra ) holds ground lingine, the controvers , raised in the present matter willt : Teheued in sans of the law laid by the Apes Court in the above precedent. Shri Harish Maheshwari project that the college imparts at ang to Masters of Nursing and Diploma Narsing at Sudents basic nanagemeta's students .
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7, 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
खण्ड 3 ( i ) ]
en raandard institute [ 1966 ( 1 ) LL.J 33 ] the ested that order to be recognized as an
4837 He details that he was paid @ Rs . 2200 PM . sometimes @Rs . 2300 PM and sometimes Rs . 2400 PM.
business , the activity
that it i
ty in the
نباسيأنه t paterial services
wenge Boord
the
its astmaucalls
the employer and employee for he ttaker the production or distribution of alices to the community at chave : anity with det elp ofemployees Ma said velve human needs bit not for
tment cac that the curvit is conducted for amaterial difference .
profit moive will not inte industry if other th
stard.
nerge o
15. Shri Maheshwari testified that claimant was thes and his wages were being paid out of the Fand marwained by the students . There was no relationship of master and servant between the parties . However , he concedes that the claimant had never received washing charges directly from the students . The College used to collect washing charges from these students and pay to the claimant monthly. Since claimant was not an employe of the College , there was no question of granting facilities of P.F. and E.S.I. to him . There was no post of Dhobi available with the Coliege . hence there was no question of terminating his services .
16. For appreciation of rival facts unfolded by the parties it would be scanned in the light of the documents proved by the parties . Cleimant had croved letter dated ith Magest , & as Ex. WW1/ 1 and asseted that on the strength of that letter he was appointed as a Dhobi by the College. Therefore , it is expedient to peruse the contents of this letter, which are extracted thus :
th: facts tested by
Mari the college ap professional education eget eb- cati... for post graduate and Mefield of Nursing . Education in the field Aureuse is abo imparted to the students in e. By impartin akataon to the students , the We provides material services to the ommunity at large . is being provided to the students and those we organized by cooperation between faculty hes of the college and its employees and those ng corried on in a manner in which trade / my organized . Therefore , all attributes of an are answered . Mere fact that there was no profit Factivity would not take out those activities out of de et industry as defined in clause ( J) of section 2 onstituently it is concluded that the college is and contention advanced by the College ate dad aside.
14. Gaimant has testified that he was appointed as the College , ide appointment letter dated 88 She then he was working with the College red Jingently . His services were terminated we f. without any reason . He made a complaint to the Esens Comis toner and thereafter the College After 12th December , 2004 the ravoppaving work to him and terminated ervices During the course of his cross examination . teseers that Principa of the College had appointed me post of Dhobi . His name was not sponsored by Nemes H. was appointed directly, when is brother let the rens of inc College . Ilis brother ' , Joel Cai Dhobi vs a regular employee of the College.
Shri Ram Chander So Shri Khem Chand has been engaged for washing the private clothes of M N. and Diploma in Nursing Education and Administration students in place of Shri Hari . Dhobi who is going abroad , with effect from 9th August , 1988 until further order . There will be ne other change in the work of other Dhobies . "
Sd
(Mrs Bandana Bhattacharya) Principal , RAK College of Nursing . New Delhi .
Contents ofEx . WW1 / 1 makes it clear that Shri Ram Chander was engaged for washing private clothes of Masters of Nursing and Diploma in Nursing Education students , in place of Hari dhobi who was going abroad . Work of other dhobis , who were engaged by the college , remained unchanged. Neither emoluments of Shri Ram Chander nor other terms and conditions , under which services of Shri Ram Chander were engaged, are detailed in this letter. Much stress has been laid by the claimant on Ex . WWI/ 1 to project that he was appointed on the post of Dhobi , on the strength of this document. Consequently it is expedient to construe the word " engaged " , which is key word of Ex . WW1 / 1 .
17. Dictionary meaning of word " engage " is to attract or involve , employ or hire , enter in to a contract to do, participate or become involved , enter in to combat with , morally committed to a particular cause , pledge to be married , betrothed, occupied or busy . In Benninga ( 1946 K.Β.58 ) word engaged was defined . It was announced therein that word " engaged " is a deplorably ambiguous . An employer engages a servant when he makes an agreement with him 4838
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16,1932
=
for his services . A workman is engaged on work when he is actually carrying it out . In fact , " engage " of a master has an entirely different meaning from " engaged" in of a workman. When it is said that a person is engaged in any business . it usually means he is engaged mainly or principally in that business , and the same would be the position , when relevant clauses refers to an establishment engaged in the specified industry ' . That is , common sense view which is consistent with the current and expected denotations of the words " engaged in " . Reference can be made to National Projects Construction Corporation Ltd. [ 1969 ( 74 ) ITR 465 ] .
18. A person acting under the direction of another is obviously employed by the personrson under whose directions he is performing the job . Legal connotation of word " employed " is well known . It connotes existence of relationship of master and servant between the employer and the employee . In other words , it involves the concept of employment under a contract of service . The word "employed " does not necessarily mean employed in casual work . It may merely mean " keeping ( him) in the service " Where A agreed with B that he , as solicitor of the company, should receive and accept a salary at Rs . 1200 per annum , instead of sending him the annual till of costs , and would act for the company for that salary , in all matters connected with the company , with certain exceptions , it may be pertinent to determine what are the obligations upon the parties to such an agreement . It appears that for a year , at least , the attorney would be bound to transact the general business of the company for that salary only , and A would be bound for the same period at least to keep him in his retainer and employment as an attorney and solicitor ; though A might have no work todo . Similarly , medical advisers may be employed at a salary to be ready in case of illness , members of theatrical establishments in case their labours should be needed ; household servants in performance of their duty when their masters wish ; in these and other similar cases , the requirements of actual service is distinct from the employment by the party employing . The test which has to be applied in determining the question as to whether a person is employed in a commercial establishment is whether he is wholly or principally employed in connection with the business of the said establislinvent As soon as it is shown that the employment of the person is either wholly or principally connected with the busmess of the establishment , he falls within the definition of an employee . Reference can be made to T. Devdasan | 1972 ( 25 ) F.L.R. 226 ] .
19. A person will be an employee , if he is employed for wages in or in connection with the work of an , establishment or if he is directly employed by the principal employer on any work of or incidental or preliminary to or connected with the work of the establishment or if he is employed by or through an immediate employer on the premises of the establishment or if his services are
Pa . fi Sti temporarily lent or let on hire to the principal camplo , erby the person with whom the person whose services de so lent or let on hire has entered into contract of ser ice The term also includes any person employed for ages connected with the administration of the establisluncat or any part , department or branch there of with the puchas of raw material for or the distribution or sorg of the products of the establishment . Reference can be made to Gnanambikai Mills Limited [ 1974 ( 2 ) LL1530 ] . The word " employee " takes within its sweep any person wholly or mainly employed on wages by an employer in on in connection with any trade , business or manuredite carried on by him . Existence of a jural relationship of master and servant is the main attribute of the word " employee " . It involves the concept of employment under a contract of service ; in contradiction to contact for service .
20. In Food Corporation of India [ 1985 1111 ) ( 4 the Apex Court ruled that the expression " employed" has at least two known connotations , viz . relationship brought by express or implied contract of service in which the employee renders service for which he is engaged by the employer and the latter agrees to pay him in cash or kind , as agreed between them. It discloses a relationship of command and obedience as essential condition for a person being an , employee and that there should be , in other words , a relationship between the employee and him as that of master and servant . Where a contractor employs a workman to do work which is connected with a thad person . the workman of the contractor would not , sabot something more , become the workman of the third person .
21. In the light of the definition of the word " e : gaged " and " employed " , it would be ascertained as to whether Ex . WW1 / 1 brings it over the record that Shri Ram Chander was engaged by the College in its services . As detailed above , the letter speaks that the College proposed to engage Shri Ram Chander " for washing of private clothes of students , in place of Shri Hari Dhobi w.e.f. 9-8-1988 " , Now it is to be ascertained as to whether the word " engaged" makes it clear that Ram Chander was employed by the College in its service . As detailed above , wages and terms and conditions of service are not detailed in letter Ex.WWW . Ex . WW 1 / A ' Vacuum as to wages and terms and conditions of service relegates Ex . W W 1/1 to a pedestral lower than that of an appointment letter . Even otherwise documents Ex . WWI / 7 to Ex . WW1/ 31 throw light on the factum of reletationship brought into existence by the parties . Ex . WW1 / 7 highlight that for September , 1998 a sum of Rs.2010 was paid to the claimant . in October . 1998 , a sum of Rs . 960 was paid to the claimant . In the like marnes , he was paid a sum of Rs.2640 for November , 1998. 1 sum of Rs. 2280 for December , 1998 , a sum of Rs . 1000 for January , 1999 , a sum of Rs . 1800 for February , 99 , sum of Rs.2340 for March , 99 , a sum of Rs . 2040 for April , 1999 , for May 99 a sum of Rs . 1200 , for July , 99 a sum of Rs . 4580 , for [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
September , 99 , a sum of Rs . 3600 , for October , 99 a sum of Rs . 1800 , November , 99 , a sum of Rs.4020 , for December , 99 , a sum of Rs. 2990 , for January , 2000 , a sum of Rs . 960 , for February, 2000 , a sum of Rs . 4020 , for March , 2000 , a sum of Rs . 2520 , for April , 2000 , a sum of Rs . 3540 , for May , 2000 , a sum of Rs . 2520 , for July to August , 2000, a sum of Rs . 2970 , a sum of Rs . 2220 for September , 2000 , a sum of Rs . 1200 , for October 2000 , a sum of Rs.3240 for November , 2000.a sum of Rs . 2340 for December , 2000. Facts detailed in above documents make it clear that Shri Ram Chander was paid for number of clothes washed by him in a particular month . He was paid as per number of clothes washed, which proposition gives meaning to the word " engaged" as used in Ex . WW 1/1 .
22. A distinction has always been drawn between " contract for service " and " contract of service " . In one case the master can order or require what is to be done , while in the other case he cannot only order or require what isto be done, but how it shall be done . The distinction is under a contract of service , a man is employed as a part of the business and work is done as an integral part of the business , while under contract for service , his work , although done for the business , is not integrated into it but is only assessory to it . But the test of being a servant does not rest now a days on submissions to orders . It depends on whether person is part and parcel of the organization .
23. Mere existence for a contract of service would not confer a relationship of employer and employee until the employer is in a position to control the work of the employee . A master is one who not only prescribes to the workman the end of his work , but directs or at any moment may direct the means also , or , as it has been put , " retains the power of controlling the work " . An independent contractor is one who undertakes to produce a given result but so that in the actual execution of the work he is not under the order or control of the person for whom he does it , and may use his own discretion in things not specified before hand .
24. Identification mark of servant is that he should be under the control or supervision of the employer in respect of details of his work . It is element of control of work , that distinguishes the relationship of master and servant . But that relationship may have a bearing on the result . Who is the pay master , who can dismiss , how long the service lasts , all have to be kept in mind , to adjudicate relationship of employer and employee between the parties . Here in the case claimant was engaged for washing of private clothes of the students and paid as per number of cloth washed by him in a particular month . The College required of him to wash clothes of the students , but never required as to how and when those clothes were to be washed . No working hours or place of work were prescribed . There was no restriction on him to wash clothes personally. He was free to get it washed from some one. All these facts
4839
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7, 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
make it clear that he was engaged for contract for service and not for contract of service . He was an independent contractor and not an employee of the College .
25. There is other facet of the coin . Shri Harsih Maheshwari unfolds that the college used to collect washing expenses from the students , which fact is depicted by documents Ex.MW1 / 3 to Ex.MW1 / 67 . When these documents are perused , it surfaced over the record that different amount of washing charges were collected from different students . In some months no washing charges were collected from some of the students . These aspects substantiate theory that the students , who got clothes washed, were made to pay charges as per number of clothes got washed . Even otherwise , claimant projects that at one point of time his services were terminated and he made a complaint to Assistant Labour Commissioner . When Assistant Lasbour Commissioner initiated action , he was again given work by the management . He now here claims that his services were reinstated . Therefore , the claimant agitates that work was given to him by the management . There is no dispute that the claimant used to perform that work at the place of his choice , without any restriction of engaging someone to perform the work on his behalf. Consequently these aspects also highlight that work was assigned to the claimant as an independent contractor and not as an employee . His engagement as a washerman on the strength of Ex. WW1 / 1 was not as an employee . it was a relationship of contract for service . Consequently u is evident that the claimant has not been able to establish that he was an employee of the management .
26. When relationship of employer and employee between the parties has not been established, claimant cannot invoke the jurisdiction of this tribunal for adjudication of his dispute , when the contract was snapped . He was not entitled for notice or pay in lieu thereof and retrenchment compensation . His disengagement does amount to retrenchment as defined in clause ( oo ) of Section 2 of the Act . No relief is available to the claimant . His claim statement is liable to be dismissed . Hence his statement is dismissed and an Award is , accordingly, passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication.
Dated : 28-6-2010
नई Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer दिल्ली , 20 जुलाई, 2010
का. आ. 1962. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार आई.ओ.सी.एल. एल.पी.जी. बौटलिंग पलांट एवं ठेकेदार मैसर्स विजय इंजीनियरिंग वर्क्स के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय , नं 1 , दिल्ली कडकडडूमा के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 73/2007 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 12-7-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-30011 /54/2007- आई आर ( एम ) ] कमल बाखरू, डेस्क अधिकार 4840
P THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16. 1932
New Delhi, the 20th July , 2010
"Whether termination of the work mize Yadav w.e.f. 16-8-2006 by M / s . Vila : Works, Contractor of IOCL is just , not, to what relief the workman conc . to and from which dar S. O. 1962. -in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 73/2007) ofthe Central Government Industriai Tribunal /Labour Court , No 1 , Karkardooma Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of IOCL LPG Bottling Plant and Ms. Vijay Engineering Works and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 12-7-2010 .
[No. L -30011 /54/2007- IR (M ) ]
KAMAL BAKIIRU , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 1 , KARKARDOOMA COURTS COMPLEX , DELHI
I. D. No. 73/2007
2. Claim statement was filed by Shri kov pleading therein that he was working as a he management. He was doing his job under of Sr. Plant Manager of the Management . under his control and supervision. On 9-8- could not report for his duries . On 10-8-20 joinhis duties , but was not allowed to ent ofthe management . On 16-8-2006 he wa his job has come to an end Management wa... employer while the contractor was interp contractor , who was having no license . was engaged with view to deprive the genuine and legal rights . He is unemploy termination of his services . He claims rete A. services of the management with continu!! wages.
3.Management 3 demurred the lai Sprivadar Yadav, Through Delhi State Kamgar Union , Raimond Khand . Giri Nagar . Kalkaji. NowDelio
Workman
Versus
1. The Sr. Plant Manager ,
IOCI.. LPG Bottling Plant, Madanpur Khadar , New Delhi - 110078 .
the claimant was enged by Mrs. Works , the contractor, from lune , 2000 was never engaged by the managemem . privity of contract between the cla management . It has been denied tha, t' interposed with a view tu den; beneftin has been pleaded that reference by the appropriate os pe ....... Lable : to any reficfan .
4. No written statener a filee
contractor .
2 M's. Vijay Engineering Works . 348-4 . Gos indpuri , Kalkaji , New Delhi- 110019.
Menement
AWARD
5. Claimant bai , bunser claim . Shri N.K.Manala We and Shri were examined on behalf of he manage witness was examine , sith the partt.
6. Arguments were heard the bay Kaushik , authorised representative , adv.an on behalf of the cla imant. Shri Rajat Ar representative , advanced on behalf of the m have given my careful considerations to advanced at the bar and cautiourdy pens My findings on issues involved in the cor follows:
7. In his affidavax.WWIA .
Ravinder Yadav was employed as a helper by Shri Vitayan, convictor ofVijay Engineering Works. ( hereinafter referred to the contractor) . Contract of maintenance work was awarded by Indian Oil Corporation , Madanpur Khadar Plant. NewDelhi ( hereinafter referred to as the management) to the contractor . The contractor had engaged Shri Ravinder Yadav in the year 2000. Shri Yadav worked with the contractor upto mid of August , 2006. When work was not awarded to the contractor by the management in the month of October and November.2006 . services of Shri Yadav were disengaged by the contractor . Shri Yadav raised a dispute before the Conciliation Officer , who served a notice to the management as well as the contractor . Since conciliation proceedings failed, the appropriate Governinent referred the dispute to this tribunal for adjudication , vide Order No. 1. 3001154.2007 - IR( M ) . New Delhi dated 24-10- 2007 , with the following terms:
hewas working as a help er at the prang on the since 2000. His last draw n wages were Rs was performing his duties unde supervision of Sr.Plant Manager De When he reported for his duties test 1 allowed to enter the premises . services were termmated. The im ona de employer , while a contactor अखण्ड ( 1) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
his legal dues . During the course of his cross anation claimant concedes that his wages were paid to troy in com . He hastens to add that management ted to ay wages of four persons to contractor , who in 19. dsed to pay his wages along with others . Piant Manager contractor terminated services on 16-3-06 . He admits to appontment letter was issued in his favour by the managennem . He further admits that M/ s . Vijay Engineering a used to deduct his contribution towards provident ite cuncedes that register kept by Vijay Engineering Works bears his signatures in token of the fact that his es were paid to him by the contractor . Photo copy of tewage register Ex . WWI/ MI to Ex . WWJ / M63 bear his ate and signatures . Ex . WW /M64 is the copy of his ESI * Shri N K.Mangla , Manager ( Plants ) , testified that Engineering Works was awarded contract for pielaissaille work at Madanpur Khadar Plant of the Paragrument. The claimant was working with the contractor , ere used to pay his wages . During the course of his cross camination , he projects that the claimant used to remain rescut inside the plant alongwith the contractor . For certain ks contract was awarded as per exigencies to M / s . Vijay reering Works . Identity Card Ex.MW1 /W20 and Ex. 21 chich were earlier marked as X - 1 and X - 2 ) Is the claimant .
P Sar : Vijayan hau testified that claimant was hem as a helper . He used to assign and peise work of the claimant, this wages were paid by Be used to pay provident lund and E.S.I. the claimant . He made contribution towards det fund , vide documents Ex.MW1 / 1 to Ex.MW1 / 8 ty of Si card of the claimant is Ex.MW2 /W10 . ry of wage register are F : WWI /Ml to Ex . WWI/ Dunng the course of cross examination , he unfolds when hat work decreased he disengaged services of primant . When work again increased he sent a message tra Jaimam to come and resume his job . He projects a he is ready to give job to the claimant . :
10 Ont of facts detailed by the claimant , N.K.Mangla , Shri Vijayan and documents proved by nem, it emerge over the record that the claimant was an ployee of the contractor . Identity card Ex.MW1 / W20 Ex.MWI W21 bring it over the record that the claimant was working with M/ s Vijayan Engineering Works and in that capacity he was permitted to enter the premises of Madanpur Khadar Plant of the management . Photo copies ef wage register Ex.WWI /MI to Ex . WW1 / M63 go to abhsh that the claimant was an employee of the Contractor Provident fund documents Ex . MW2 / 1 to MW2/ 8 and ESI Card Ex . MW2 / 10 give reaffirmation to that fact. Therefore , it is emerging over the record that the claimant was engaged by M / s . Vijay Engineering Works , to whom plant maintenance work was awarded by the management . Claimant used to work as helper with Vijay
4841 Engineering Works , to carry out the work awarded to the contractor . When work decreased Shri Vijayan disengaged services of the claimant . Consequently it stands established that the claimant was an employee of M/ s . Vijay Engineering and there existed no relationship of employer and employee between the claimant and the management .
11. In the reference order , the appropriate Government has referred a proposition as to whether termination of the claimant by M/ s Vijay Engineering Works contractor of I.O.C.L. is just , fair and legal . M/ s . Vijay Engineering , a private contractor , carries out maintenance work awarded to it by the management . Question for consideration comes as to whether the Central Government is the appropriate Government for making a reference of the aforesaid dispute to this Tribunal . For an answer provisions of clause ( a ) ( i) of Section 2 of the I.D. Act , 1947 (inshort the Act ) shall be taken into consideration, which provisions are extracted thus :
"( a) appropriate Governmentt means
(1) in relation to any industrial dispute concerning any industry carried on by or under the authority of the Central Government or by a railway company or concerning any such controlled industry as may be specified in this behalf by the Central Government or in relation to an industrial dispute concerning a Dock Labour Board established under Section 5A of the Dock Workers ( Regulation of Employment ) Act , 1948( 9 of 1948 ) , or the Industrial Finance Corporation of India Limited formed and registered under the Companies Act, 1956 ( 1 of 1956 ) or the Employees ' State Insurance Corporation established under section 3 of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) , or the Board of Trustees constituted under section 3A of the Coal Mines Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act , 1948 (46 of 1948 ) , or the Central Board of Trustees and the State Boards of Trustees constituted under section 3 A of the Coal Mines Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1948 ( 46 of 1948 ) , or the Central Board of Trustees and the State Boards of Trustees constituted under section 5A and section SB , respectively , of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act , 1952 (19 of 1952 ) , or the Life Insurance Corporation ofIndia established under section 3 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act . 1956 ( 31 of 1956 ), or the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited registered under the Companies Act, 1956 ( 1 of 1956 ) , or the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation established under section 3 of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act , 1961 (47 of 1961 ) , THE GAZETTE OF ONMA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
[ PAR 11 Sic. 3 ( ii ) ]
.:
Lt. Governor in exercise of his functions in relation of the matters with respect to which the Legislative Assembly has power to make laws . In case difference of opinion between Lt. Governor and his ministers on any matter , the Lt. Governor shall refer it to the President for decision and act according to the decision given theicon by the President and pending such decision the 1.1 . Governor is competent to take action in urgent matters . The Chief Minister shall be appointed by the President and Ministers shall be appointed by the President on the advise of the Chief Minister . Therefore , it is evident that though a Legislative Assembly is there in National Capital territory of Delhi , yet it is a union territory administered by the President through the Administrator appointed by him. In case of difference of opinion between the Administrator and the Ministers . it is the decision of the President that prevails . Consequently the State Government merges with the Centre when Lt. Governor administer the Union Territroy or in case of difference of opinion where the President decides the issue .
or the Central WarehousingCorporation established under section 3 of the housing Corporations Act . 1962 (58 of ", or the Unit Trust of India established inder section 3 of the Unit Trust of India Act , 1963 ( 52 of 1963 ) , or the Food Corporation of India established under section 3. or a Board of Management established for two or more contiguous States under section 16 , of the Food Corporations Act , 1964 ( 37 of 1964 ) , or De Airports Authority of India constituted under section 3 of the Airports Authority of trila Act, 1994 ( 55 of 1994 ) , or a Regional Rural Dank established under section 3 of the Regional Rural Banks Act , 1976( 21 of 1976 ) , or The Export Credit and Guarantee Corporation imited or the industrial Reconstraction Bank t India Limited , the National Housing Bank established under section 3 of the National Housing Bank Act , 1987 ( 53 of 1987 ) or an air usport service , or a banking or an insurance company, a mine , an oil field, a Cantonment Isoard , or a major port , the Central Government
relation to any other mouser dispute , the Some Government ; "
13. State Government has been defined in clause ( 60 ) of section 3 of the General Clauses Act . 1897 , in respect of anything done or to be done after commencement of the Constitution ( 7th Amendment ) Act , 1956 in a case of State , the Governor and in a Union Territory, the f'entral Government . Therefore , it is evident that for a Union Territory , no distinction has been made between the State and the Central Government . The President administers the Union Territory , through an Administrator appointed by him . In case of National Capital Territory of Delhi , it is being administered by the President though the Lieutenant Governor . Though there is a legislative Assembly and Council of Ministers , yet in case of difference of opinion between the Lieutenant Governor and Council of Ministers . the decision of the President shall prevail , which fact make it clear that for the purpose of administration of the union territory , the Central and the State Government merges over certain matter .
34 corfory with respect to the matters enumerated in
the sta fist or the Concurrent List except the matters
14. High Court of Delhi was confronted with sach a proposition in M.K. Jain ( 1981 Lab . 1.C.62 ) wherein it was laid as follows : " The award was sought to be voided , inter alia, on the ground that by virtue of the constitution and composition of the Corporation , Central Government was the only authority competent to make a reference of the dispute to the Industrial Court and that the reference by the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi was , therefore , in excess of powers . Even otherwise no exception could be taken te the order of reference , even if it be assumed that Central Government was the appropriate Government , in as much as the distinction between the Central and the State Government in relation to the Union Territory in our constitutional framework is rendered illusory , Union Territory is administeredby the President of India under Article 239 of the Constitution of India , acting to such shall be the appropriate Government for the oute? Answer has been provided in clause ( a) ( ii) ow of the Act, which contemplates that in relation ntner industrial dispute than those referred in clause wee Government is the appropriate Government Hos Tribunal is not oblivious of the proposition territory of Delhi enjoins a special status under thestar . Delhi is a Union Territory having some sious with respect to its administration . he Constitution speaks that every union administered by the President acting ,to thinks it , through an admin'strator to be JasJam with such designation as he may specify . A makes specind provisions with respect to bong therein thue the umon territory of Delhi the National Capital Territory of Delhi and Puitusin for thereor appointed in Article 239 shall be wel as the Lieutenant Guverner . There shall be sembly, and provisions of Articles 324 to adlpply in relation the Legistative Assembly the Capital Territory of Delhi as they apply in te State . The Legislative Assanbly shall have Jamise laws for the whole or any part of the National to entries 1. 2 and 18 of the State List and Ne Da Wed 66 of thor tist , in so for they relate to the 18. The Council of Ministers shall be 4 : Chief Minister to aid and advise the [ भाग II- खखष्ष्ठ 3 ( ii) ]
extent as he thinks fit . Therefore the Administrator , to be appointed by him , in the case of Union territory , there is an amalgamation of the constitutional classification of legislative and executive powers between the Centre and the States . According to section 3 (60 ) of the General Clauses Act , the " Central Government " in relation to the administration of Union Territory means the Administrator acting within the scope of authority given to him under Article 239 of the Constitution of India and in terms of section 3 ( 60 ) of the General Clauses Act , " State Government " as respects anything done or to be done in the Union Territory means the Central Government. In the case of Union Territory , therefore , the Central and State Governments merge and it is immaterial whether an order ofreference is made by one or the other . This contention must , therefore, fail" .
15. Again in Mahavir [97 (2002) DL T 922 ] the High Court was confronted with the same proposition . Relying the precedent in M. K. Jain (supra ) with profit it was ruled that reference made by the Government of NCT of Delhi was not bad despite the fact that appropriate Government was the Central Government . Difference of State Government and Central Government goes to the brink of abolition when State Government has been defined as the Central Government by clause (60 ) of section 3 of the General Clauses Act and Delhi is being administered by the President through the Administrator appointed by him. Therefore , the aforesaid precedents make it clear that astatus of union territory of Delhi can be termed as Central Government in certain matters .
16. Whether the Central Government can be termed as State Government for any purpose ? Article 53 of the Constitution provides that the executive power of the Union shall vest in the President and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with the Constitution . Article 73 defines extent ofexecutive power of the Centre , that is , on matters which shall be controlled and administered by the Central executive . It has been detailed therein that the executive power of the union shall extend ( a) to the matters with respect to which Parliament has power to make laws and (b) to the exercise of such rights , authority and jurisdiction as are exercisable by the Government of India by virtue of any treaty or agreement . The extent of the State executive power is set out in Article 161 of the Constitution . Administrative relations between the union and the states is to be dealt in accordance with the provisions of Articles 256,257,258,258A, 260 and 261 of the Constitution . Article 258A was added by 7th Amendment Act , 1956 to make a matching provision - to clause ( 1 ) of Article 258 of the Constitution . While exercising powers contained in clause (1) of Article 258 , the President is empowered to entrust union functions to a State Government or its officers . There was no provisions enabling the Governor of a State to 2904 GF / 10-21
4843
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7, 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
entrust state functions to the Central Government or its officers . That lacuna was found to be of practicable difficulty and provisions of Article 258 A were inserted in the Constitution . Thus it is evident that arena of union executive powers and the state executive powers are well defined.
17. Clause (8 ) of section 3 of the General Clauses Act defines the Central Government in relation to administration ofUnion Territory , the Administrator thereof acting within the scope of authority given to him under Article 239 of the Constitution . Therefore, it is evident that Administrator of Government of N.C.T. Delhi has been defined to mean as Central Government to administer the Union Territory of Delhi . Hence for the limited purposes , provided in the Constitution , executive functions of the Central Government can be entrusted to Government of a State or itsOfficers . However the Central Government would not be termed as the State Government, when those functions are being executed by the State Government or its officers . So executive power ofthe Union can be exercised, in certain matters by the State Government or its officers but in that situation too the Central Government would not be termed as the State Government . The special provisions referred above would not make the reference , made by the Central Government as the reference made by Government of N.C.T. ofDelhi .
18. There is other facet of the coin . This Tribunal was constituted vide notification No.A - 11020/ 33 / 75 - CLT dated 30-9-76 . It was provided in the notification that the Tribunal has been constituted under the powers provided in sub - section ( 1 ) of section 7 - A of the Act , with its head quarter at New Delhi . Another notification was issued on that very date empowering the Tribunal to adjudicate applications moved in sub- section (2 ) of section 33 - C of the Act, in relation to the workman employed in any industry in the Union Territory of Delhi in respect ofwhich the Central Government is the appropriate Government. Therefore, the Tribunal has been empowered to adjudicate industrial disputes , in respect ofwhich Central Government is the appropriate Government . As pointed out above, the appropriate Government in this case is the State Govemas Under these circumstances this Tribunal cannot entertain the present dispute for adjudication , in respect of which appropriate Government is the State Government .
19. Since this Tribunal cannot invoke its jacLION to adjodicate the reference hence the Tribunal retains it hands from entering into the merits of the matter . The Central Government was not competent to make a reference of this dispute to this Tribunal . The parties should seck redressal at the appropriate forum . With these observations an award is passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication .
Dated: 25-6-2010
Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer 4844
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 /SHRAVANA 16, 1932
नई दिल्ली , 21 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1963.-- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार इन्डियन ऑयल कारपोरेशन के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नई दिल्ली के पंच्चार (संदर्भ संख्या 20/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-7-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-30011/112/2003- आईआर ( एम ) ] कमल बाखरू, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 21st July , 2010
S.O. 1963.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.20 /2004 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 16-7-2010 .
[No. L - 30011 / 112 / 2003 - IR ( M) ] KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR . R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER , CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No.1 , KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX , DELHI .
I.D. No. 20/2004
The General Secretary , Bhartiya Shramjivi Sangh , 240 , Lawyers ' Chamber Western Wing, Tis Hazari Court , Delhi -110054
Claimant
Versus
1. The General Manager , Indian Oil Corporation YusufSarai , New Delhi - 110029 .
2. The General Manager , Indian Oil Corporation I.O.C.L. Bottling Plant , Tikri Kalan , New Delhi
[PART II--SFC. 3 ( ii ) ] notification No. 734 ( E) dated 21st October 100 % Prohibiting employment of contract labour on works siz. loading , unloading , removal of liquified petrol gas , putting seal cap , preparation of soap solution , testing of cylinders , sorting out ofdefective and five year old cylinders , peon in office , plants , depots and terminals , supply of mobile container and loading /unloading of lube oils on trucks etc. The Management filed a writ petition CWP No. 5775/ 1998 wherein application CM No 6012/1999 was moved seeking stay of opperation of the aforesaid notification . Though prosecution of the management for non compliance of the provisions of the said notification was stayed , yet operation of the notification remained in force . Claimants raised a demand for their absorption in service of the management , which demand was not conceded to Bharatiya Shramjivi Sangh was approached by the claimants , who raised an industrial dispute on their behalf before the Conciliation Officer . Since conciliation proceedings failed , the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , vide order No. L- 30011 / 112/ 2003 - IR ( M) New Delhi , dated 25-2-2004, with the following terms :
"Whether the demand of the contract labourers ( as per annexure ' A' ) engaged by M / s . Gupta Paradise . New Delhi , in relation to absorption / regularization of their services in the establishment of Airport Authority of India , New Delhi , is just , fair and legal ? Ifyes , to what relief these workmen are entitled and from which date ? "
2. Subsequently a corrigendum was issued by the appropriate Government vide order No.F. L - 30011 / 112 /2003- IR(Misc . ) , New Delhi , dated 22-9-2004 , wherein terms of reference were modified as follows: -
"Whether the demand of the Bhartiya Shramjivi Sangh for absorption / regularızation of ine services of Contract Laboureres ( as per list enclosed ) employed through contractors in the establishment of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Delhi Bottling Pla: New Delhi is just , fair and legal ? If yes , what relie ! these workmen are entitled to and from which date ? יי List of 17 workmen was also enclosed with the said corrigendom , which was facsimile of annexure appended to the terms of reference.
Management
AWARD
Haulage contract at L.P.G. Bottling Plan : kri Kalan , Delhi , was awarded by the Indian Oil Corphet Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Management ) to a contractor , who employed claimants to carry out the job. Inmily the bottling plant was located at Shakur Bastı Terminal , which was later on shifted to Tikri Kalan , Delhi . Various contractors changed but the claimants continued to wor's the management since 1993. Governmnet of india issued 3. Claim statement was filed by the claimants pleading therein that they are working with the management since 1993 and some of them even prior to that year , till They have worked continuously with out any break in service . They are working with the manangement and doing jobs ofpermanent nature . Vasudevan Committee has opined that the management should not deploy any one in the plant , who does not has exeprience to work in the plant . The committee further details that no contract labour can be appointed / deployed by the management inside the [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
plant except for the purposes of loading and unloading of cylinders for private vehicles , that too in 15 meters area from the plant . The claimants are entitled to be designated or treated as regular employee of the management . There is a vast difference between wages paid by the management to their regular employees and those paid to the claimants . On21st of October , 1997 ,Goverament of India issued a notification prohibiting the management deploy contract labours at 8 places . A writ petition was filed by the management assailing the notification before the High Court of Delhi , wherein the High Court stayed proescution of the officers of the management but operation of tee notification was left uncontrolled . Since the notification is in force , the management cannot treat them as contract labours .
4. Sometime back , on the complaint effect amants , the authorities from the office of the regional Labour Commissioner visited Tikri Kalan Bottling Fiant of the management and found contract labours werking on 8 places where deployment of contract labour was prohibited . Though the claimants were engaged by the management , yet they were illegally shown as employees of the contractor . It has been claimed that the management may be commmanded to treat them as their regular employees since the date of their employment and pay them wages equivalent to regular employees , with consequential benefits .
5. Contest was given to the claim by the management pleading that the Contract Labour ( Regulation and Abolition ) Act , 1970 ( in short the Contract Labour Act ) is a self contained code . An employee of a contractor has no right to approach the authorities under the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( in short the Act ) without exhausting remedies available under the Contract Labour Act . As per information gathered from the contractors Ajay Singh , Naval Kishore , Suresh Kumar , and Bhushan Pandey are working with M / s Jain Brothers , while Ranbir Singh , Virender Kumar , Rajesh Gaur and Anil Kumar are working with M / s Chirag & Co. and Mahipal Singh , Jagdamba Pal . Chander Bhushan , Kuldeep Singh , Kartar Singh , Bhirn Singh , Rajesh Kumar and Bhim Singh ( Master ) are working withM / s Sidhi Vinayak , haulage contractor . None of them was an employee of the management . Dispute raised by them cannot be termed as an industrial dispute within the meaning of definition provided in clause ( k ) of Section 2 of the act . Bharatia Shramjivi Sangh has no locus standi to espouse their claim . Claim petition is , therefore , incompetent .
6. The management pleads further that haulage contractors were appointed by it at Tikri Kalan L.P.G. Bottling Plant for certain jobs , which are not essential or permanent . Contracts were awarded to the contractors in terms of the provisions of the Contract Labour Act . The management is registered as a principal employer while
4845
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7, 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
contractors , namely , M/ s Sidhi Vinayak , Jain Brothers and Chirag & Co. are having licenses under the provisions of Contract Labour Act . None of the claimants were ever engaged by the management . Vasudevan Committee was appointed for a different purpose to examine facts after fire broke out incident at Shakur Basti Terminal . No recommendation was given by that committee to treat the claimant as employees of the management . Issuance of notification dated 21-10-1997 is not a matter of dispute . However , management claims that the said notification is under challenge before High Court of Delhi . High Court has granted a stay order in favour of the management , which has been made absolute . There is no merit in the claim for absorption of the claimants in services of the management . Their claim, being devoid of merits , is liable to be dismissed .
7. On pleadings of the parties following issues were settled by my Ld . predecessor : -
1. Whether the claimants are direct employees of the management ?
2. Whether an industrial dispute , in terms of Section 2 (k) of Industrial Disputes Act, has arisen between the parties ?
3. Whether the workmen are covered under the provisions of Contract Labour ( Regulation and Abolition ) act , 1970 ? If so its effect ?
4. Whether the claim petition is maintainable ?
5. In terms of reference .
6. Relief .
8. Shri Brij Bhushan Pandey tendered his affidavit in support of the claim . He was cross - examined at length on behalf of the management . Shri Vishal , Deputy Manager , was examined on behalf of the management . No other witness was examined by either of the parties .
9. Arguments were heard at the bar . Shri A.K. Sakhuja assisted by Shri Punit Sehgal , authorized representative , advanced arguments on behalf of the claimant . Shri Rajat Arora , authorized representative , raised his submissions on behalf of the management . I have given my careful consideration to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record. My findings on above issues are as follows : -
Issuse No. 1 .
11 ) . Facts unfolded by Shri Brij Bhushan Pandey in his affidavit Ex . WW1 / A are sufficient to record a finding on this issue . For sake of convenience those facts are extracted hereto . He swears in his affidavit that the claimants raised a dispute before the Conciliation Officer detailing therein that they be treated as regular employees of the management , since they have been working there since 4846
[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
M/ s . Sidhi Vinayak , haulage contractors . The management never paid wages to them . Claimants were paid their wages by the contractors . Management used to pay contractors for the work executed by them . Management issues appointment letters to its employees . Identity Cards Ex . WW1 / 7 , Ex . WW1 / 9 , Ex . WW1 / 11 , Ex . WW1 / 14 to Ex . WW1 / 16 , Ex. WW1 / 19 , Ex. WW1 / 20 , Ex . WW1 / 23 , Ex. WW1 /25 to Ex . WW1 /31 , Ex . WW1 / 33 to Ex . WW1 /48 , Ex. WW1/53 to Ex . WW1 / 55 , Ex . WW1 / 58 , Ex. WW1 / 66 to Ex . WW1 / 72 , Ex . WW1 / 78 , and Ex . WW1 / 79 were not issued by the management to the claimants . These cards were issued to the contractors for being given to the claimants , on account of security reasons . Aforesaid 17 claimants were working at Tikri Kalan site of the management with different contractors since 1993. Не concedes that since 1993 some of the claimants are continuously working , though the contractors have changed at an interval of two years , who performed their duties in the premises of the management .
1993 or even prior to that date and doing job of regular employees without any break in their services . Since conciliation proceedings failed, the appropriate Government had referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication . Outof these facts it is evident that a dispute was raised by the claimant before the Conciliation Officer claiming that they be treated as regular employees of the management , since they are working with the management for a very long period without any break . In these facts it was not asserted that they were appointed by the management and as such a relationship of employer and employee was created between the parties . It is implicit , out of these facts , that the claimants want to assert that they be treated as regular employees of the management , though they were engaged by the contractor ( later portion of the sentence has been supplied by the undersigned while no such fact were highlighted by the affiant . ) . He further unfolds that the claimants are working with the management since 1993 and some of them are working prior to that date continuously without any break , but they have not been treated as regular employees . The claimants are doing the job which is of permanent nature and not a temporary one . Hewent on to narrate that Vasudevan Committee report has observed that no contract labour can be appointed / deployed by the management inside the plant except for the purposes of loading and unloading of cylinders for private vehicles that too out side the plant . Government of India had issued notification dated 21-10-97 whereby it has prohibited the management to deploy contract labour at 8 places and inspite ofthat notification the management is treating the claimants as contractual labours / temporary labours , who are working at 8 places where their development is prohibited . Implementation of the said notification is still in operation . Claimants project that they have been shown as contractual labours , yet in fact they have not been appointed by any of the contractors . They are entitled to get themselves designated or treated as regular employees of the corporation. It has been conceded by Shri Pandey that photo copy of Identity Cards Ex . WW1 /7 , Ex . WW1 / 9 , Ex . WW1 / 11 , Ex . WW1 / 14 to Ex. WW1 / 16 , Ex . WW1 / 19 , Ex . WW1 /20 , Ex . WW1 /23 , Ex . WW1 /25 to Ex . WW1 / 31 , Ex . WW1 / 33 to Ex. WW1/48 , Ex . WW1 / 53 to Ex . WW1 / 55 , Ex . WW1 / 58 , Ex . WW1 / 66 to Ex. WW1 / 72 , Ex . WW1 / 78 , and Ex . WW1 / 79 . Ex . WW1 / 79 relate to the claimants . He admits that no appointment letter was issued to him or other claimants by the management. However , it is not disputed that the appointment letters and Identity Cards are issued by the management to its regular employees .
12. Out of facts projected by Shri Brij Bhushan Pandey and Shri Vishal , the Deputy Manager , it came to light that claimants were never appointed by the management in its employment . No appointment letter was ever issued by the management to the claimants . Their wages were never paid by the management . Security passes were issued to the claimants which are Ex . WW1 / 7 , Ex . WW1 / 9 , Ex . WW1 / 11 , Ex . WW1 / 14 to Ex . WW1 / 16 , Ex . WW1 / 19 , Ex . WW1 /20 , Ex . WW1 / 23 , Ex . WW1 /25 to Ex . WW1 /31 , Ex. WW1 /33 to Ex . WW1 / 48 , Ex. WW1 / 53 to Ex . WW1 / 55 , Ex . WW1 / 58 , Ex . WW1 / 66 to Ex . WW1 / 72 , Ex . WW1 / 78 , and Ex . WW1 / 79 . When these security passes are perused , it came to light that these security passes were issued to the claimants for having entry inside the premises of the management , being employees of the contractor . These security passes project that claimants were engaged by the contractor , for doing the work which was awarded to the latter. These security passes are relied and proved by the claimants themselves . Therefore , these documents coupled with testimony unfolded by Brij Bhushan Pandey make it clear that no case was projected by the claimants that they were direct employees of the management . Claimants claimed that since they have been working with the management since 1993 or prior to that date and performing jobs , which are prohibited by the notification dated 21-10-97 . Hence they be designated / treated as regular employees of the management . Consequently , it is crystal clear that the claimants were not directly engaged by the management in its employment . In such a situation it cannot be said that the claimants were direct employees of the management . Issue is , therefore , answered in favour of the management and against the calimants .
Issuse Nos . 2 , 3 am 4
11. Shri Vishal deposed that the claimants , namely , Ajay Singh , Rajbir Singh , Virender Kumar , Rajesh Gaur , Nawal Kishore , Abal Singh , Suresh Kumar , Brij Bhushan Pandey , Mahipal Singh , Jagdamba Pershad , Chander Bhushan, Kuldeep Singh , Kattar Singh , Bhim Singh , Rajesh Kumar , Bhim Singh , and Anil Kumar were the employees of M / s . Chirag and Company , M/ s . Jain Brothers and
13. Shri Brij Bhushan Pandey swears in his affidavit Ex. WW1 / A that the claimants were performing job of the भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
management continuously since 1993 or even prior to that date . Government of India issued notification dated 21-10-97 prohibiting management to deploy contractual labour at 8 places . Inspite of the notification , they were appointed by the management at 8 places . Though a writ petition was preferred by the management but operation of the notification has not been stayed . Since the claimants are working with the management at those places where contract labour is prohibited , they may be treated as regular employees of the management for all intents and purposes . Shri Vishal deposed that the management challenged notification dated 21-10-97 before High Court of Delhi and operation of the notification was stayed . However, in subsequent breath he corrects his mistake and concedes that the operation of the notification has not been stayed by the High Court . He further concedes that aforesaid 17 workmen are working at Tikri Kalan site of the management , with different contracts , namely , M / s . Jain Brothers , M/s . Chirag & Comany and M/ s . Sidhi Vinayak, haulage contractors . He admits that claimants are working continuously with the management since 1993 though the contractors have changed at an interval of two years . He does not dispute that the claimants performed their duties in the premises of the management .
14. Rival facts presented by Shri Pandey and Vishal bring it over the record that the claimants are working in the premises of the management since 1993 , under different contractors . Though the contractors have changed at different intervals yet the claimant continued to work with the management . Notification dated 21-10-97 was issued by the Government of India , prohibiting deployment of contract labours for loading , unloading , removal of liquefied petrol gas , putting seal cap , preparation of soap solution , testing of cylinders , sorting out of defective and five year old cylinders , peon in office , plants , depots and terminals , supply of mobile container and loading/ unloading of lube oils on trucks etc. The said notification has been assailed by the management before High Court of Delhi by way of writ petition , which pends adjudication . Operation of the said notification has not been stayed . Therefore , it is emerging over the record that despite prohibition of deployment of contract labours for the aforesaid jobs , the claimants were deployed for those jobs by the management through the agency of the contractors .
15. The Contract Labour Act was enacted by Parliament to deal with abuses of contract labour system . It appears that Parliament adopted twin measure to correct continuation of employment of contract labour-the first is to regulate employment of contract labour suitably and the second is to abolish it in certain circumstances . This approach is clearly discermible from the provisions of the Contract Labour Act which came into force on 10-2-71 . Perusal of the statement of objects and reasons of the Act shows that in respect of such categories , as may be notified by the appropriate Government , in the light of the
4847 prescribed criteria , the contract labour will be abolished and inrespect of the other categories the service conditions ofthe contract labour will be regulated .
16. Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act provides for prohibition of employment of Contract Labour in any process , operation or other work in an establishment . The words " process , operation or other work " need not to be interpreted to mean only the core activity and not peripherial activity . In sub section (2 ) of Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act , certain guidelines have been provided for the Government , before the issue of any notification to find out whether the " process , operation , or other work " is incidental or necessary for the ' industry ' , trade , business , manufacture or occupation that is carried on in the establishment . The expression used therein is wide in ambit to cover other activity arising in industry and not merely the actual manufacture . Otherwise to understand the expression " process , operation , or other work " other than the meaning given in clause ( a) of sub - section (ii ) of Section 10 would be to narrow down the meaning thereto . The question whether contract labour should be abolished or not in a given situation is totally left to the Government after consultation with the Central Board or the State Board , as the case may be . Before taking a decision under sub- section ( 2 ) of Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act , the Government must also specify other relevant factors as provided in clauses ( a ) to ( d ) thereof.
17. When contract labour working in an establishment are of the opinion that their job is of perennial in nature , they will have to approach the appropriate Government , which on arriving at a satisfaction and upon compliance ofthe formalities laid down in sub - section (2 ) of Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act , including clause (d) of thereof , may issue an appropriate notification in that regard . Such proposition of law was laid by Calcutta High Court in Sujan Banerji [ 2001 ( 2) LLJ 470 ] . Here in the case a notification was issued by the appropriate Government on 27-10-97 , prohibiting deployment of contract labour by the management for the jobs referred above . Operation of the said notification is still in force , though the management has assailed it before High Court ofDelhi . Despite operation of the said notification , claimants are being deployed by the management through contractors . In such a situation the claimants have approached this Tribunal seeking a relief that either they may be designated or treated as regular employees of the Corporation. When a notification under Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act is issued , it becomes duty of the employer to find out whether all contract labours working in the establishment could be dully absorbed in regular employment or should be allowed to continue as contract labours as before . In the later case they should be absorbed in regular employment as and when vacancies arise . This is so for the reason that the Contract Labour Act is intended to provide not only absorption of contract labour in certain 4848
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
[PART 1 SEC. 3 circumstances but also regulation of the employmnet of the contract labour . In such a situation it cannot be said that the contract labour have no right to resort to proceedings under the provisions of the Act , against the principal employer when there is total or partial denial of existing employment subsequent to abolition of contract labour . Such proposition of law was laid by Kerala High Court in T. Chander Mohan Nayyar ( 1994 LLR 626 ) .
The Apex Court ruled that these cases fall in class ( 3 ) mentioned above . Judgment in Hussain Bhai ( supra ) was considered by the Apex Court in the said preceden and it was ruled therein that the said precedent falls in class ( 2 ) , referred above . The Apex Court concluded that on issuance of prohibitive notification under Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act prohibiting employment of contract labour or otherwise , in an industrial dispute brought before it by the contract labour in regard to conditions of service , the Industrial Adjudicator will have to consider the question whether the contractor has been interposed either on the ground of having undertaken to produce any given result for the establishment or for supply of contract labour for work of the establishment under a genuine contract or is a mere ruse / camouflage to evade compliance of various beneficial legislation so as to deprive the workers of the benefit there under . If the contract is found to be not genuine but a mere camouflage , the so called contract labour will have to be treated as employees of the principal employer who shall be directed to regularize the services of the contract labour in the establishment concerned subject to the conditions as may be specified by it for that purpose .
19. It is not possible to perceive in Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act any implicit requirement of automatic absoruption of contract labour by the principal employer in his establishment on issuance of a notification by the appropriate Government , under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act . prohibiting employment of contract labour in that establishment Consequently the principal employer cannot be required to order absorption of the contract labour working in his establishment. Therefore , the contract labour had to approach a Labour Court or a Tribunal constituted under the Act for redressal of his grievance . Since decision of the industrial adjudicator / court , who can order aboliuon of contract labour or declare a contract to be sham and nominal and contract labour working in the establishment ofthe principal employer as an employee of the principal employer himself. Such jurisdiction vests with this tribunal , as laid by the Apex Court in Steel Authority of India Ltd. ( supra) . Therefore , despite the fact that the claimants claim themselves to be contract labours , to whom the provisions of Contract Labour Act Applies , yet the issue which they have raised in the petition is an industrial dispute within the meaning of clause ( k ) of Section 2 of the Act . The claim petition cannot be thrown away as not maintainable . On reasons , detailed above , the aforesaid issues are answered in favour of the claimants and against the management .
Issuse No. 5
20. Shri Vishal concedes that the aforesaid 17 claimants are working at Tikri Kalan site of thte management withdifferent contractors since 1993. He further concedes 18. The Apex Court was confronted with the proposition as to whether automatic absorption of contract labour , working in an establishmnet of the principal employer , as regular employees follows on issuance of a valid notification under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act prohibiting the contract labour in the establishment concerned , in Steel Authority of India Limited [ 2001 ( 7 ) S. C.C.1 ] . Catena of decisions were considered by the Apex Court and it was laid therein that the contract labours fall in three classes viz , ( 1 ) where contract labour is engaged in or in connection with the work of an establishment and employment of contract labour is prohibited either because the industrial adjudicator / court ordered abolition of contract labour or because the appropriate Government issued notification under section 10( 1 ) of the Contract Labour Act , no automatic absorption of contract labour working in the establishment was ordered , ( 2 ) where contract was found to be a sham and nominal , rather a camouflage , in which case contract labour working in the establishment of the principal employer were held , and in fact and in reality to be the employees of the principal employer himself . Indeed such cases do not relate to the abolition of contract labour but present instances wherein the court pierces the veil and declares the correct position and as a fact at the stage after employment of contract labour stood prohibited , (3 ) wherein discharge of statutory obligation of maintaining a canteen in an establishment the principal employer availed the services of the contractor . The courts have held that the contract labour would indeed be employees of the principal employer . The Court ruled that neither Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act nor any other provision in that Act , whether expressly or by necessary implication , provides for automatic absorption of contract labour on issuance of notification by the appropriate Governemnt under sub section ( 1 ) of Section 10 , prohibiting employment of contract labour , in any process , operation or other work in any establishment . Consequently the principal employer cannot be required to order absorption of the contract labour working in the establishment concerned . It was further ruled therein that in Saraspur Mills case [ 1974 ( 3 ) SCC 66 ) , the workman engaged for working in the canteen run by the Cooperative Society for the appellant were the employees of the appellant mills . In Basti Sugar Mills (AIR 1964 S.C. 35.5 ) a canteen was run in the factory by the Cooperative Society and as such the workers working in the canteen were held to be employees of the establishment .
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
that though the contractors have been changed at an interval of two years , yet the claimants are continuously working with the management since 1993. They perform their duties in the premises of the management . Therefore , out of facts conceded by shri Vishal , it is emerging over the record that work , performed by the claimants , is of perennial nature and sufficient duration . For an answer to the proposition referred , this Tribunal is under an obligation to consider the nature of work , duties performed by the claimants , duration of work and permissibility of contract labour for such nature of work . Work of putting seals on L.P.G. cylinders , preparation of soap solution , testing of cylinders , sorting out of defective and five year old cylinders , peon in office , plants , depots and terminals , supply of mobile container , for sufficient duration is available with the management .
21. Though the contractors have changed time to time , yet the claimants continued to work with the management . It emerges over the record that the contractors were interposed by the management . It has not been projected by the management that how different contractors used to engage the claimants for the very jobs , which were being performed by them since 1993. There is vaccum of evidence over that issue . All inference emerge over the record that contracts executed by the management with various contractors in reality appear to be facade of paper arrangement . Claimants were engaged by the management under the garb of contracts entered into with diffferent contractors . With vested interest , the management put a veil on reality and engaged the claimnats through various contractors , who were only the name lenders . I have perused Ex . MW1 / 2 to Ex . MW1 / 17 , which are contract documents on the strength of which haulage work was awarded to various contractors , On perusal of these documents it came to light that rates of various haulage activities were to be in accordance with work and rate schedule attached to the documents Those works , rates and schedules have not been brought to the notice of this Tribunal . It seems that those works and rate schedules would have brought some inconvenient situations over the record , which led the management to conceal it . Since material facts were concealed by the management , this situation persuades me to conclude that there is no substance in these documents , to find out that these contracts were genuine .
4849
भारत का राजपत्र : अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
the supervision of a well trained supervisor . In absence of any supervisor from the contractor , it is emerging over the record that the work of the claimants was being supervised by the management .
23. Work of haulage activities , within the premises ofthe management , has been prohibited by the appropriate Government on the strength of notification dated 27-10-97 . Though there cannot be automatic absorption of the claimants in the service of the management , yet it is evident that jobs , performed by the claimants , were of perennial in nature and for sufficient duration . No steps were taken by the management to absorb the claimants in their services . It has emerged over the record that the claimants were being paid minimum wages , while regular employees ofthe management were paid better salary . That fact highlights that despite perennial work and that for sufficient duration , services of the claimants were not regularized by the claimant with a view to deprive them their benefits available under labour laws . Consequently , I find that the contracts entered into by the management with various contractors were drapped with legal formalities with a view to evade compliance of various labour laws . The claimants could show that their demand for absorption in the services of the management is just, fair and legal . Therefore , the management is to be commanded to abolish contract labour at its premises at Tikri Kalan and absorb the claimant in its services , within a period of one month from the date when award becomes operative . Issue is , therefore , answered in favour of the claimants and against the management .
Relief
24. As held above , the management has employed contract labours , despite prohibition by the appropriate Government in that regard , for works , which are of perennial nature and of sufficient duration . It was so done with a view to avoid compliance of various labour laws , in the matter ofthe claimants . Consequently , this Tribunal thinks it expedient to command the management to abolish the contract labour system in its L.P.G. Bottling Plant , Tikri Kalan , Delhi and absorb the claimants in their services within one month from the date when this award comes into operation . An award is , accordingly , passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication .
Dr. R. K. YADAV , Presiding Officer Dated : 25-6-2010
22. There is other facet of the coin . Security passes were issued to the claimnats to enter the premises of the management to carry out the work assigned . No case has been projected by the management that besides the claimant , there was some other employee of the contractor who used to supervise and assign work to the claimants . Admittedly the claimants were working in the premises of the management job performed by them was of such a nature to be carried out by an experienced person , under नई दिल्ली , 21 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1964.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार इन्डियन आयल कारपोरेशन मार्केटिंग डिवीजन एवं केयरवेल मै -टीनेन्स इन्टरप्राइजेज, के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार 4850
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16, 1932
औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 32/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-7-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।
[सं. एल-30011/37/2004 - आईआर ( एम ) ] कमल बाखरू , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 21st July , 2010
S.O. 1964. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No.32/2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of IOCL & Carewell Maintenance Enterprises and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 16-7-2010 .
[No. L - 30011 /37/2004 - IR (M ) ]
KAMAL BAKHRU , Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL No. 1 , KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHL
I.D. No. 32/2004
The General Secretary, All India Gen. Mazdoor Trade Union , 170 Balmukund Khand , Giri Nagar , Kalkaji , New Delhi - 110019
[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ] their services , which petition could not bring the required results . Ultimately , they raised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer . Management as well as the contractor were made party to the conciliation proceedings . Since conciliation proceedings failed , the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , vide order No. L - 30011 / 37 /2004 - IR ( M) New Delhi , dated 10th of June , 2004 , with the following terms :
"Whether the demand of All India General Mazdoor Trade Union ( Regd .) , 170 , Balmukund Khand, Giri Nagar , Kalkaji , New Delhi against the management ofI.O.C.L. ( Marketing division ) , Northern Region , New Delhi , for regularization of services of 20 workmen as in the list attached , engaged in the work of house keeping and maintenance which is a continuous and regular nature of work , is just , valid and legal ? If so , to what benefits the workmen are entitled for and what directions are necessary in the matter ? "
Claimant
Versus
1. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. ( Marketing Divn . ) , Northern Region , World Trade Centre , Barakhamba Road , NewDelhi
2.M/ s . Carewell Maintenance Enterprises , 404 , Sector 37 , Noida ( UP)
....Management
AWARD
Contract Labours were engaged by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the management ) at its World Trade Centre Office through M/ s . Carewell Maintenance Enterprises ( hereinafter referred to as the contractor ) . The management is registered under the provisions of Contract Labour ( Regulation & Abolition ) Act, 1970 in short the contract Labour Act and the contractor was also having a license under the provisions of the said Act . The contract labours belaboured under misconception that since they were working at the premises of the management from a long period , they were entitled to be regularized in the service of the later . They filed a writ petition before High Court of Delhi for regularization of 2. Claim statement was filed by the workmen pleading therein that Shri Braja Bandhu Parida was working asplumber while other workmen were working as sweepers , with the management since long . They were being paid only a sum of Rs . 2592 each as then wages , while regular employees were paid a sum of Rs . 7645 per month . They were entitled to equal pay and equal benefits to that regular employees of the management under sub - section (5) of Section 25 of the Contract Labour Act . A sham agreement was executed between the management and the contract while the contractor used to come to collect his commission only . They were supervised and assigned work by the officers of the management . They are entitled for regularization of their services with the management.
3. Claim was resisted by the management pleading that the claimants were employees of the contractor and were not entitled to aproach the authorities under the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( in short the Act) without exhausting remedies available to them under the contract Labour Act . It has been denied that the claimants were ever engaged by the management . It has been further denied that they were working continuously from last two decades in the service of the management. It is also disputed that work performed by them was regular and perennial in nature . The management has appointed Haulage contractor in terms of the provisions of the Contract Labour Act . M/ s . Carewell Maintenance Enterprises was awarded contract , who is having license under the provisions of Contract Labour Act . Management is registered with the authorities . It has been denied that provisions of sub- section ( 5) of Section 25 of the Contract Labour Act were ever violated by the management . It has beenpleaded that claim put forward for regularization of services of the claimants with the management is devoid of merits and liable to be dismissed .
[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]
4. The contractor opted not to file any written statement in the matter.
5. Out of pleadings , following issues were settled by my Ld . predecessor : -
1. Whether the dispute raised is an industrial dispute within the meaning of Section 2(k) ofthe I.D. Act ?
2. Whether the claimants are workmen within the meaning of section 2(s) of I. D. Act ?
3. Whether the reference is barred under the provisions of Contract Labour ( Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 ?
4. Whether the contract awarded by Indian Oil Corporation to the contractor is within the ambit of provisions of Contract Labour ( Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 ?
5. As per terms of reference .
6. Relief.
6. Naresh Kumar (WW1 ) , Dhan Kumar (WW2 ), Narinder Kumar (WW3 ) and Shri Tej Bahadur (WW4 ) were examined on behalf of the claimants . Affidavits of Shri Khazan Singh , Satyavir Kanchid , Paras Ram , Kiran Pal , Bhagwat , Tejbir , Baleshwar , Dalip Kumar , Arwind Kumar , Harjinder Singh, Prem Pal , Surender, Faqir Chand Braja Bandhu , Parida, Tara Chand and Ram Kumar were also tendered in evidence on behalf of the claimants . However, they opted not to enter the witness box to face ordeal of cross examination. Since no opportunity could be accorded to the management to purify facts sworn by the aforesaid claimants in their affidavits , hence contents ofthose affidavits cannot be read in support of their claim .
7. Shri Vishal Deputy Manager ( Employee relations ) was examined on behalf of the management.
8. Arguments were heard at the bar . Shri B. Κ . Prasad , authorized representative , advanced arguments on behalf of the claimant . Shri Rajat Arora , authorized representative , raised his submissions on behalf of the management . I have given my careful consideration to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record . My findings on above issues involved in the controversy are as follows : -
Issues No. 1 to 3
9. Neresh Kumar swears in his affidavit Ex. WW1 / Athat he was initially enıployed on 8th of May , 87 through M/ s . Carewell Maintenance Enterprises for a work of sweeper under the directions and control of Subhash Arora, O.P. Chhabra and Suresh Arora , Assistant Administration , Assistant and Administrative Officers respectively of the management. He was performing his duties continuously upto 11-5-2004. During the pendency ofhis dispute before 2904 47 / 10-22
4851
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7, 2010/श्रावण 16 , 1932
the appropriate Government his services were terminated w.e.f. 12-05-04 without taking any prior permission from Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central ) cum -Conciliation Officer. His complaint pends before the Conciliation Officer against the action of termination of his services . Pay of July, 1993 was given directly to him by the management Duties performed by him were of perennial in nature and contract labour cannot be employed against the said work. No proper registration was procured by the management and contractor was also having no license under the provisions of Contract Labour Act . The work on which he was employed is still in existence. The contract between the management and the contractor was sham and camouflage . During the course ofhis cross examination he concedes that his P.F. subscriptions were deducted by M/s . Carewell Maintenance Enterprises . He further presents that one month wages was paid by the Indian Oil Corporation, under the directions of the authorities of Labour Department. He could not explain as what was the meaning of word " contract was sham and camouflage " .
10. Affidavits of Shri Dhan Kumar and Naresh Kumar were on similar lines . In their cross examination they concede that they were employed by M /s . Carewell Maintenance Enterprises. they further concede that their wages were being paid by M/ s . Carewell Maintenance Enterprises . Shri Tej Bahadur , Labour Enforcement Officer , swears that the management was registered in their office under the provisions of Contract Labour Act . He further presents that no registration is required for sweeping job .
11. Shri Vishal , Deputy Manager , deposed that the claimants , were employees of the Contractor , namely , M/ s. Carewell Maintenance Enterprises , to whom contract was awarded in early 1990s . contract was extended from time to time, which came to an end in the year 1997. In the subsequent breath he presents that the contract was terminated in the year 2004 and not in 1997. He went on to depose that Indian Oil Corporation is registered under the provisions of Contract Labour Act and the contractor was having a license under the said Act , which license is Ex . MW1 /W1 . Contractor was making payment of we .. to the contract labours , who used to pay contributio towards provident fund and ESI facility for the claimants. Management used to ensure payments made by the contractor towards contribution of provident fund and ESI facility. When conciliation proceedings faited, the management terminated contract of contractor . He concedes that Ex. WW1 / 1 to Ex . WW1 / W10 , Ex.MWI /W2 , Ex.MW ! /W3, Ex.MW1 /W4 , Ex.MW1 /W5 , Ex.MWI /W6 Ex.MW1 / W7 , Ex.MW1 /W8 , Ex.MW1 / W9 , Ex.MW1 / W10 to Ex . MW1 /W30 are gate passes/entry passes issued to the claimant by the management . Ex. MW1 /W31 to Ex . MW1 /W36 are letters written by the management to the contractor. Ex. MW1 /W37 is a letter written by Government of India to the Management . Ex . MW1 /W39 projects 4852
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010 / SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
payment made by the manageemnt to the claimant on behalf ofthe contractor , before the Conciliation Officer .
12. When facts testified by the aforesaid witnesses were closely scanned, it came to light that the claimants were engaged by M/ s Carewell Maintenanee Enterprises and deputed with the management to carry out job in pursuance of the contract awarded to it . Gate Passes / entry passes were issued by the management to the claimants . These gate passes make it evident that the claimants were permitted entry inside premises of the management to carry out the work assigned to the contractor . These gate passes clearly spell that the claimants were employees of the contract and not of the management. The facts projected by the witnesses referred above make it clear that there is no dispute to the proposition that the claimants were employees of the contractor . Their case is that since they are performingjobs of permanent in nature . they are entitled to be regularized in the services of the management.
13. The Contract Labour Act was enacted by Parliament to deal with abuses of contract labour system . It appears that Parliament adopted twin measure to correct abuses of employment of contract labour - the first is to regulate employment of contract labour suitably and the second is to abolish it in certain circumstances . This approach is clearly discernible from the provisions of the Contract Labour Act which came into force on 10-2-71 . Perusal of the statement of objects and reasons of the Act shows that in respect of such categories , as may be notified by the appropriate Government , in the light of the preseribed criteria , the contract labour will be abolished and in respect of the other categories the service conditions of the contract labour will be regulated.
14. Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act provides for prohibition of employment of Contract Labour in any process , operation or other work in an establishment . The words " Process , operation or other work " need not to be interpreted to mean only the core activity and not peripherial activity . In sub section ( 2 ) of Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act , certain guidelines have been provided for the Government , before the issue of any notification to find out whether the " process , operation , or other work " is incidental or necessary for the ' industry ' , trade , besiness , manufacture or occupation that is carried on the establishment . The expression used therein is wide in ambit to cover other activity arising in industry and not merely the actual manaufacture . Otherwise to understand the expression " process , operation , or other work " other than the meaning given in clause (a ) of sub section (2 ) of section 10 would be to narrow down the meaning thereto . The question whether contract labour should be abolished or not in a given situation is totally left to the Government after consultation with the Central Board or the State Board , as the case may be . Before taking a decision under
[ PARI II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] sub section ( 2 ) of Section 10 of the contract Labour Act , the Government must also specification other relevant factors as provided in clauses ( a) to ( d ) thereof.
15. When contract labour working in an establishment are of the opinion that their job is of perennial in nature , they will have to approach the appropriate Government, which on arriving at a satisfaction and upon compliance of the formalities laid down in sub section ( 2) of Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act , including clause (d) thereof , may issue an appropriate notification in that regard . Such proposition of law was laid by Calcutta High Court in Sujan Banerji (2001 ( 2 ) LLJ 470 ) . When a notification under section 10 of the Contract Labour Act , is issued, it becomes duty of the employer to find out whether alll contract labours working in the establishment could be duly absorbed in regular employment or should be allowed to continue as contract labours as before . In the later case they should be absorbed in regular employment as and when vacancies arise . This is so for the reason that the Contract Labour Act is intended to provide not only absorption of contract labour in certain circumstances but also regulation of the employment of the contract labour . In such a situation it cannot be said that the contract labour have no rightto resort to proceedings under the provisions of the Act , against the principal employer when there is total or partial denial of existing employment subsequent to abolition of contract labour . Such proposition of law was laid by Kerala High Court in T. Chander Mohan Nayyar ( 1994 LIR 626 ).
16. The Apex Court was confronted with the proposition as to whether automatic absorption contract labour , working in an establishment of the principal employer , as regular employees follows on issuance of a valid notification under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act, prohibiting the contract labour in the establishment concerned , in Steel Authority of India Limited ( 2001 ( 7 ) S.C.C. 1 ) . Catena of decisions were considered by the Apex Court and it was laid therein that the contract labours fall in three classes viz . ( 1 ) where contract labour is engaged in or in connection with the work of an establishment and employment of contract labour isprohibited either because the industrial adjudication/ court ordered abolition of contract labour or because the appropriate Government issued notification under Section 10 ( 1 ) of the Contract Labour Act , no automatic absorption of contract labour working in the establishment was ordered . (2) where contract was found to be a sham and nominal , rather a camouflage , in which case contract labour working in the establishment of the principal employer were held , and in fact and in reality to be the employers of the principal employer himself. Indeed such cases do not relate to the abolition of contract labour but present instances wherein the court pierces the veil and declares the correct 4853 भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]
=
establishment . Therefore , the contract labour had to approach a Labour Court or a Tribunal constituted under the Act for redressal of his grievance . Since decision of the industrial adjudicator / court , who can order abolition of contract labour or declare a contract to be sham and nominal and contract labour working in the establishment of the principal employer as an employee of the principal employer himself, would decide relationship between the parties , jurisdiction vests with this tribunal , as laid by the Apex Court in Steel Authority of India Ltd. ( supra ) . Therefore , despite the fact that the claimants claim themselves to be contract labour , to whom the provisions of Contract Labour Act applies , yet the issues raised in the petition answer all aspects of an industrial dispute defined in clause ( k ) of Section 2 of the act and it cannot be thrown away as not maintainable . On reasons , detailed above , the aforesaid issues are answered in favour of the claimants and against the management .
Issuse No. 4 to 5
18. Provisions of Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act empowers appropriate Government to prohibit by notification in the Official Gazette , employment of contract labour in any process , operation or other works in any establishment . Sub- section ( 1 ) of section 10 of the said Act commmences with a non obstante clause and over- rides other provisions of the act . The appropriate Government may after consultation with Central Advisory Board or State Advisory Board , as the case may be , prohibit employment of contract labour in any process , operation or other work in any establishment . Before issuance of the notification , the appropriate Government shall have regard to the conditions of work and benefits provided, for the contract labour in that establishment and other relevant factors such as : -
(a) whether the process , operation or other work is incidental to , or necessary for the industry , trade , business , manufacture or occupation that is carried on in the establishment ;
(b) whether it is of perennial nature , that is to say , it is of sufficient duration having regard to the nature of industry , trade , business , manufacture or occupation carried on in that establishment ;
position and as a fact at the stage after employment of contract labour stood prohibited , (3 ) wherein discharge of statutory obligation of maintaining a canteen in an establishment the principal employer availed the services of the contractor . The courts have held that the contract labour would indeed be employees of the principal employer . The Court ruled that neither Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act nor any other provision in that Act , whether expressly or by necessary implication , provides for automatic absorption of contract labour on issuance of notification by the appropriate Government under sub section ( 1 ) of Section 10 , prohibiting employment of contract labour , in any process , operation or other work in any establishment. Consequently the principal employer cannot be required to order absorption of the con'ract labour working in the establishment concerned . It was further ruled therein that in Saraspur Mills case (1974 ( 3 ) SCC 66 ) , the workman engaged for working in the canteen run by the Cooperative society for the appellant were the employees of the appellant mills . In Basti Sugar Mills ( A.IR 1964 S.C. 355 ) a canteen was run in the factory by the Cooperative Society and as such the workers working in the canteen were held to be employees of the establishment . The Apex Court ruled that these cases fall in class ( 3 ) mentioned above . Judgment in Hussain Bhai ( 1978 ( 2 ) LLJ 397) was considered by the Apex Court in the said precedent and it was ruled therein that the said precedent falls in class (2) , referred above . The Apex Court concluded that on issuance of prohibitive notification under section 10 of the Contract Labour Act prohibiting employment of contract labour or otherwise , in an industrial dispute brought before it by the contract labour in regard to conditions of service , the Industrial Adjudicator will hav e to consider the question whether the contractor has bee n interposed either on the ground of having undertaken to produce any given result for the establishment or for supply of contract labour for work of the establishment under aa genuine contract or is a mere ruse / camouflage to evade : compliance of various beneficial legislation so as to deprive the workers of the benefit there under . If the contract is found to be not genuine but a mere camouflage , the so called contract labour will have to be treated as employees ofthe principal employer who shall be directed to regularize the services of the contract labour in the establishment concerned , subject to the conditions as may be specified by it for that purpose.
( c) whether it is done ordinarily through regular workmen in that establishment or an establishment similar thereto ;
(d) whether it is sufficient to employ considerable number of whole - time workmen .
19. When a contract labours feel that job performed by them are of perennial in nature they may approach the appropriate Government for issuance of a notification under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act , 17. It is not possible to perceive in section 10 of the Contract Labour Act any implicit requirement of automatic absoruption of contract labour by the principal employer in his establishment on issuance of a notification by the appropriate Government, under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 10 of the Contract Labour Act , prohibiting employment of contract labour in that establishment . Consequently the principal employer cannot be required to order absorption of contract labour working in his 4854
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
[PART II--SEC . 3 (ii) ]
whether as a consequence of non compliance with the provisions of section 7 and 12 of Contract Labour Act , by th principal employer and the licensee respectively , the contract labour employed by the principal employer would become his employee . Observing the precedent in Standard Vaccum Case [ 1960 ( 3 ) SCR 466] and pointing out guidelines enumerated in sub section (2) of section 10 of the Contract Labour Act, the Apex Court ruled that in such a situation only consequences would ensue that penal priovisions contained in section 23 and 25 of the Contract Labour Act would apply and merely because the contractor and the employer had violated the provisions of the said Act or the rules , no command would be issued to the effect that the contract labour deemed to have become an employee of the principal employer . It was made clear by the Apex Court that neither the provisions of the Contract Labour Act nor the rules framed thereunder by the Central Government provide that upon abolition of the contract labour the labours would be directly absorbed by the principal employer . Hence it is evident that even non compliance of the provisions of the Act would not ipso facto have a result of absorption of contract labour in the ser vice of the principal employer .
or in alternative may approach the authorities under the Act for redressal of their grievance , as laid by the Apex Court in SteelAuthority of India ( supra) . It was concluded therein that on issuance of prohibitive notification under Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act, prohibiting employment of contract labour or otherwise , in an industrial dispute brought before it by the contract labour in regard to conditions of service the Industrial Adjudicator will have to consider the question whether the contractor has been interposed either on the ground of having undertaken to produce any given result for the establishment or for supply of contract labour for work of the establishment under a genuine contract or is a mere ruse/ camouflage to evade compliance ofvarious beneficial legislation so as to deprive the workers of the benefit there under . If the contract is found to be not genuine but a mere camouflage , the so called contract labour will have to be treated as employees ofthe principal employer who shall be directed to regularize the services of the contract labour in the establishment concerned, subject to the conditions as may be specified by itfor that purpose . Law laid by the Apex Court recognize a right in favour of contract labour either to approach the appropriate Government or a Tribunal under the act for redressal of his grievances .
20. Claimants have approached this Tribunal for redressal of their grievance when the present dispute was referred to it for adjudication . This tribunal can commance the management to abolish the contract labour system or reach a conclusion that the contract entered into between the management and the contractor was sham and nominal and the claimants in reality were the employees of the principal employer . Therefore to exercise the said jurisdiction the Tribunal has to consider the material produced before it . As detailed above a contract can be awarded by the principal employer when it is registered under the provisions of contract labour Act , to a contractor who has a license under the provisions of the said Act . Shri Vishal projects that the management is registered under the provisions of Contract Labour Act and the contractor was having license , which is Ex.MW1 / W1 . Facts projected by Shri Vishal get support from events unfolded by Shri Tej Bahadur , the witness examined on behalf of the claimants . Tej Bahadur presents that the management was registered under the privisions of Contract Labour Act, despite the fact that no registration was required for awarding a sweeping job to a contractor . He has proved documents Ex.WW4/ 1 Ex.WW1/3 in that regard . Therefore , it is emerging over the record that the management was registered under the provisions of Contract Labour Act and the contractor was having a license to supply contract labour for sweeping job . Claimants could not point out that while awarding the contract to M / s Carewell Maintenance Enterprises management has violated the privisions of the Contract Labour Act .
22. Shri Vishal unfolds that fetters Ex .MW1/ 31 and Ex.MW1 / 32 and Ex.MW1 /33 to Ex.MW1 / 36 were written by the management to the contractor . When perused it came to light that vide Ex.MW1 / W32 the management has accepted the offer of the contractor for providing him upkeep and other maintenance services at the office of the management located in New Delhi House , as are being provided at their office at World Trade Centre Building . When contents of Ex.MW1 / W32 were closely perused it came to light that in para ( 1) jobs which are to be carried out, daily, in para (2 ) job which are to be carried out weekly and para ( 3 ) job which are to be carried out monthly has been enlisted . Ex.MW1 / W35 makes it clear that a total sum ofRs . 36800 PM was to be paid to the contractor for house keeping and maintenance work on first second and fourth floor of the office premises located at World Trade Centre . Schedule of work with quality , rate and amount , besides terms and conditions of the contract and other special conditions were annexed there with . Special terms and conditions enjoin a duty on the contractor to make arrangement to identify each of his worker at security point while entering the premises for resuming work and at the time ofdeparture on completion of the work . Log book of every day work was to be kept by the contractor or his representative with a right to location in charge or officer in- charge to check entries therein on day to day basis . Sweeping, cleaning and other house keeping services were to be completed by 9.30 AM and work force of 5-6 persons were to be deployed every day for satisfactory completion ofwork . Contractor was to make arrangement for articles required for sweeping purposes . He was to make adequate arrangements for the manpower , including their 21. There is other facet of the coin . In Dina Nath [ 1992 ( 1 ) S.C.C. 69 ] Apex Court construed the question , भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010 / श्रावण 16, 1932
[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
transportation . He ( contractor ) was under an obligation to ensure that his representative is always available for appropriate administration and supervision of work during office hours . He was to ensure that his workmen wear uniform while on duty and display identity cards . These facts make it clear that it was the contractor who used to assign and supervise the work of the claimants .
23. Contractor was under an obligation to make regular and full payment of labour charges , salaries and other payments to the claimants as per labour laws , specially under the Minimum Wages Act and Payment Wages Act. He was commanded to comply provisions of the Minimum Wages Act, Workmen compensation Act , Payment of wages Act, Payment of Bonus Act , Employees Provident and Miscellanceous Provident Fund Act , E.S.I. Act , the Act and Contract Labour Act . He was supposed to furnish provident fund number to the principal employer . These facts make it clear that a duty was cast on the contractor to make compliance ofall labour laws in respect of employment of the claimants . He was under an obligation to make payment under the provisions of Minimum Wages Act , which fact further highlights that the management had not attempted to deprive the claimant of their benefits , by resorting to the award of contract for house keeping job to M/ sCarewell Maintemance Enterprises .
4855 enterprises and the claimants were deployed by the contractor at the premises of the management since 1986. It is not the case that the work , so awarded , was prohibited bythe appropriate Government by isssuance of notification under sub - section ( 1 ) of section 10 of the Contract Labour Act. The Contract Labour Act prohibits as well as regulates deployment of contract labour in certain services . Contract Labour has not been prohibited in maintenanace services by the appropriate Government . Therefore , that fact that the claimants were deployed as contract labour would not persuade this Tribunal to order abolition of the contract labour , specially in the circumstances when the contractor is not found to be an agent of the principal employer . Therefore , I do not find it to be a case for issuance of a command to the management to abolish contract labour system in jobs of house keeping. Therefore , demand ofAll India General Karamchari Trade Union for regularisation ofthe services of the claimants with the management cannot be found to be just , valid and legal . Issues are , therefore , answered in favour of management and against the claimants .
Relief
26. In view of the findings recorded on issue No. 4 and 5 , claimants are not entitled to relief of regularization of their services with the management . Their claim is liable to be dismissed , hence the same is dismissed . An award is , accordingly , passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication .
Dated: 25-6-2010
24. Contractor was saddled with an obligation to deploy one supervisor to control and manage his employees at the premises of the management . In case of failure to maintain house keeping services on day to day basis or in part or full , contractor was liable to be penalized at the rate of Rs . 1000 per day . In case claimants were to be found on duty without uniform a penalty of Rs . 25 for every such occasion was to be imposed , which was personal responsibility of the contractor . In case carpenter and plumber were absent from duty then a penalty of Rs 1000 was to be imposed , which was to be recovered from bill of the contractor . All these facts make it clear that there were penalty clauses to enforce discipline on the contractor. The management had not taken disciplinary control over the claimants . These facts make it clear that administrative , financial and disciplinary control over the claimants vested with the contractor . The contract between the management and the contractor had not violated the provisions of any labour laws and in such a situation it cannot be said that the agreement entered into between the management and the contractor was sham and nominal . One cannot conclude that the contract was interposed with a view to avoid benefits available to the claimants under the labour laws.
25. Thrust of contention of the claimants has been that they are working with the management since long and jobs performed by them were of perennial in nature . It is not disputed on behalf of the management that work of house keeping was awarded to M /s Carewell Maintenance
DR . R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 21 जुलाई , 2010
का.आ. 1965. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय स्टेट बैंक , भुवेनश्वर के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 1/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-7-2010 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[ सं. एल- 12012/ 236/ 2002 - आईआर ( बी- I ) ] जोहन टोपनो , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st July , 2010
S.O. 1965. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Case . No. 1 / 2003 ) as shown in the annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India , L.H.O. , Bhubaneswar and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 21-7-2010 .
[No. L- 12012/ 236/ 2002 - IR ( B - I) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secy .
4856
[ PART 11--SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR -COURT, BHUBANESWAR
AND
Present :
Shri J. Srivastava , Presiding Officer , C.G.I.T. -cum -Labour Court , Bhubaneswar .
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO . 1/2003
Date of Passing Award 9th July 2010
Between:
1. The Chief General Manager , State Bank of India , L.H.O. , Jawaharlal Nehru Marg , Bhubaneswar- 751001 .
2. The Dy . General Manager , State Bank of India , Zonal Office , Bhubaneswar ( Orissa ) -751002 .
1st Party Managements
AND
The President , State Bank of India Employees Union , C/ o . State Bank of India Zonal Office , Bhubaneswar ( Orissa) -751009
2nd Party - Union
APPEARANCES :
The case of the 2nd Party - workman in brief is that he has been working as Lift Operator on temporary roll under the 1st Party - Management since 5-10-1993 in their Local Head Office at Bhubaneswar starting with a consolidated pay of Rs . 900 per month being enhanced from time to time to Rs . 2500 with effect from 1-4-1999 . His appointment along with an other workman namely Shri Sunil Kumar Nayak was made against two permanent sanctioned posts ofLift Man . After the death of Shri Sunil Kumar Nayak on 23-7-1998 the disputant - workman has been operating both the lifts alternatively . The disputant- workman is a matriculate with I.T.I certificate in eletrical trade having experience in operation of lift . He was engaged after due process of selection by the 1st Party - Management . He has been performing his duties assigned to him efficiently and diligently and there is no adverse remark of any kind against him. He has now rendered more than seventeen years of continuous unblemished service and in the process has lost his upper - age limit for employment elsewhere . But his services are not being regularized by the 1st Party- Management . The action of the 1st Party - Management by not allowing him appropriate pay scale and other service benefits at par with other employees of the bank is discriminatory and amounts to unfair labour practice prohibited under the Constitution . The disputant workman has the required qualification for holding the post of Lift Man and having been selected and even working against a regular sanctioned post he is not being considered for regular appointment . The disputant- workman with all force is entitled to regular appointment against the sanctioned post of Lift Man and for payment of regular pay scale and other service benefits from the date of his initial engagement in the said post .
For the 1st Party Managements .
M/ s . H.K. Mohanty, Advocate
For the 2nd Party Union
M/s. B.C. Bastia & Associates , Advocate
AWARD
The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 ( A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred an industrial dispute existing between the employers in relation to the Management of State Bank of India , L.H.O. , Bhubaneswar and their workman vide their letter No. L - 12012/236/ 2002- IR(B - I ) dated 23-12-2002 to the following effect .
"Whether the action of the Management of State Bank of India , Bhubaneswar for not regularizing the service of Shri Bijay Kumar Panda , Lift Operator who has rendered more than nine years of continuous service without any break against sanctioned regular post of Lift Operator and also not paying on the basis of scale of wages for the sub- staff w.e.f. 5-10-1993 is justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled and from which date ? "
The 1st Party - Management while denying the averments made in the statement of claim by the disputant- workman have stated that Shri B.K. Panda had never been engaged as Lift Operator on temporary roll in its Local Head Office at Bhubaneswar . He was engaged as an independent contractor on retainer basis for lift operation at its Zonal Office . His engagement was valid till the need of the 1st Party - Management . He was being paid by the bank a fixed consolidated amount agreed by him . There was no relationship of employer and employee between the Ist Party -Management and the disputant - workman . His pay was increased from time to time with the increase of price index of essential commodities and labour charges . It is false to allege that Shri Panda was appointed as a Lift Man through due process of selection against the permanent sanctioned post . Shri Panda admittedly being a matriculate and over qualified is not eligible for any such post in the subordinate cadre under the service of the bank . The allegation regarding recommending the name of the disputant-workman for regularization is false and denied. The case of Shri G.C. Sahu is not similar to the case of Shri Panda. As such Shri Panda is not entitled for any relief whatsoever.
4857 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]
भारत का राजपत्र अगस्त 7 , 2010/ श्रावण 16 , 1932
1993 " . M.W. - 1 has further stated that till date the Inhis rejoinder the disputant - workman has reiterated same allegations as made in his statement of claim and further added that for operation and maintenance of electrical lift I.T.I Trade in electrical line is essential and obviously a person without matric qualification cannot possess I.T.I certificate . Apart from operation of lift he also performs the duties of electrical maintenance of the bank as and when required . The disputant- workman is performing his duties himself during normal banking hours under the control and supervision of the 1st Party- Management and being paid his wages by the 1st Party- Management . Therefore , he is an employee / workman under the 1st Party- Management and he cannot be termed as an independent contractor under any canon of law.
On the aforesaid pleadings of the parties the following issues were settled .
ISSUES
1. Whether this Tribunal has jurisdiction to try this case?
2. Whether the services of the workman Shri Bijay Kumar Panda , Lift Operator can be regularized?
3. Whether Shri Bijay Kumar Panda , workman has got necessary qualification to be regularized against a permanent post ?
4. If not , to what relief he is entitled to ?
The 2nd Party - workman , Shri Bijay Kumar Panda has examined himself as W.W. - I and has also exhibited documents from Ext . - l to Ext . - 11 . The 1st Party Management, on the other hand , has examined two witnesses namely Shri G.L. Narasingham as M.W. - I and Shri Bed Prasad Satpathy as M. W. - 2 and have not exhibited any documents in support of their case.
FINDINGS
ISSUE NO. I
This issue relates to the jurisdiction of this Tribunal to try the case . On perusal of the averments in the written statement it is no where gathered that the 1st Party Management has any challenge to the jurisdiction of this Tribunal . Therefore till issue seems to be redundant and is struck off and answered accordingly .
ISSUE NO . П
Management has not been able to recruit suitable persons to fill up the post of Lift Operator . The witness has admitted thatsince December , 2004 the bank is paying him the basic salary of a Lift Operator plus D.A. Except this he is not enjoying other service benefits of a regular post . In his cross - examination he has further admitted that the disputant-workman has been paid his arrears from November 2002 to June 2005 in respect of D.A. , HRA . , CCA etc. Ext . - 10 is the copy of such arrear bill . It is also a fact that, the workman was allowed by the 1st Party- Management to avail Leave Travel Concession which is clearly evident from Ext - 11 . Although the 1st Party Management's stand as to the nature of employment of the disputant -workman is not static but it is clear that he has been working on temporary basis uninterruptedly without any break since the period of his engagement and he is being paid by the bank itself. The Management Witness No.2 . Shri Beda Prakash Satpathy , Manager ( Fire Safety) when asked about the engagement of the disputant- workman against vacant post, he stated that since he was simply a duty detailer he cannot say whether his engagement was against a vacant post or not . Whatever may be the position , the disputant- workman , continuing on the post of Lift Man for several years when there is a sanctioned regular post cannot be denied his claim for regularization . The disputant workman has also deposed before this Tribunal that he was appointed on the basis of an interview but no appointment letter was issued to him . Ext. -3 shows that he was engaged on retainer basis and he is now getting basic salary with D.A. , HRA , & CCA since December 2005. Ext . - 1 , 2 & 3 go to shows that the posts of Lift Man were sanctioned prior to the engagement of the disputant-workman as Lift Man . The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bhagwati Prasad -Versus- Delhi State Mineral Development Corporation [ LLJ - 1990- ( I ) S.C. 320 ] has held that" once appointments were made as daily rated workers and they were allowed to work for a considerable length of time, it would be hard and harsh to deny them conformation in the respective posts on the ground that they lack the prescribed educational qualification. But here in the present case it is stated to be a case of over qualification . In the case ofMineral Exploration Corporation Employees Union- Versus - Mineral Exploration Corporation Ltd. & Another [ LLJ 2006 ( III ) S.C. 482 ] the Hon'ble Supreme Court ruled out that the workman who had worked from 8 to 20 years could not be termed as temporary or casuals and directed their regularization after enquiry regarding genuineness of their claim for regularization . In view of the above , the disputant -workman Shri B.K. Panda can be regularized against the sanctioned post of Lift Operator . This issue is answered accordingly in favour of the disputant- workman.
ISSUE NO . Ш
The 1st Party - Management have averred in their written statement that assuming there is a post of It isan undisputed fact that the disputant - workman was engaged by the 1st Party - Management as Lift Operator ontemporary roll with effect from 5-10-1993 and has been continuing in the post without any break . But his services were not regularized inspite of the fact that he was engaged against sanctioned posts of Lift Man . M.W. - I Shri G.L. Narasingham has clearly stated in his deposition that "he has been engaged against a vacant post of a Lift Operator . In the month of Sept. 1993 two posts of Lift Operator were created and pending recruitment the workman was engaged on daily rated basis in the year 4858
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7 , 2010/ SHRAVANA 16 , 1932
Lift Operator the same being of subordinate cadre for which the eligibility is under - matriculate , having passed Class - VIII , Shri Panda being admittedly a matriculate and over qualitied is not eligible for any such post in the subordinate cadre under the services of the bank . This contention of the 1st Party - Management does not hold good , firstly because over qualification was not looked into and considered at the time of his initial engagement on the post of Lift Man and secondly, over qualification cannot become a disqualification subsequently . Ext . - 3 shows that the 1st Party - Management had proposed to engage two temporary Lift Men with minimum I.T.I qualification and the I.T.I qualification cannot be held without passing matriculate examination as has been averred by the disputant- workman . Management Witness No. 1 Shri G.L. Narsingham has admitted in his cross - examination that " the workman has necessary qualification to be appointed as Lift Operator " . Therefore , it cannot be said that the disputant - workman Shri B.K. Panda has not got necessary qualification to be regularized in the post of Lift Man against sanctioned permanent post . He having necessary qualification is entitled for regularization of his services as Lift Man . This issue is answered accordingly in favour of the disputant- workman.
ISSUE NO . IV
From the foregoing discussions it is to be concluded that the disputant - workman Shri B.K. Panda is entitled for regularization of his services against a regular sanctioned post of Lift Man . Now the question arises as to from which
[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ] date this benefit is to be accorded to him . The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held in the case of N. Birendra Singh - Versus- L. Priyokumar Singh & Others [ 2006 ( 110 ) FLR 226 SC] that regularization of service is to be made with effect from the date on which the petitioner - appellants were appointed on adhoc basis . The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Bank of India- Versus - C.G.I.T. , Bombay [LLJ ( 1 ) 2006 ( Bom . 244 ] while making the terms more clear has held that regularization of service is required to be made from the date of availability of vacancies and if the concerned workmen had worked for years and put in 240 days service prior to such date , their regularization must be made from the date of availability of vacancies . In the instant case the disputant - workman has been continuing on the post of Lift Man since 5-10-1993 . The regular posts of Lift Men were sanctioned prior to his engagement on 5-10-1993 . Therefore his services are to be regularized with effect from his initial engagement i.e. with effect from 5-10-1993 . In the result the disputant - workman is entitled to get his services regularized against the sanctioned regular post of Lift Man with effect from 5-10-1993 with all consequential service benefits including pay scale and other allowances .
The 1st Party - Management is accordingly directed to comply with the dictates of this Award within a period of three months .
Reference is answered accordingly . Dictated & Corrected by me .
J. SRIVASTAVA , Presiding Officer Printed by the Manager , Government of India Press , Ring Road , Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 .